Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Classification
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
Tags:
medical
License:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,41 +1,96 @@
|
|
1 |
-
---
|
2 |
-
dataset_info:
|
3 |
-
- config_name: default
|
4 |
-
features:
|
5 |
-
- name: condition_label
|
6 |
-
dtype: int64
|
7 |
-
- name: medical_abstract
|
8 |
-
dtype: string
|
9 |
-
splits:
|
10 |
-
- name: train
|
11 |
-
num_bytes: 14334753
|
12 |
-
num_examples: 11550
|
13 |
-
- name: test
|
14 |
-
num_bytes: 3606846
|
15 |
-
num_examples: 2888
|
16 |
-
download_size: 9606491
|
17 |
-
dataset_size: 17941599
|
18 |
-
- config_name: labels
|
19 |
-
features:
|
20 |
-
- name: condition_label
|
21 |
-
dtype: int64
|
22 |
-
- name: condition_name
|
23 |
-
dtype: string
|
24 |
-
splits:
|
25 |
-
- name: train
|
26 |
-
num_bytes: 171
|
27 |
-
num_examples: 5
|
28 |
-
download_size: 1611
|
29 |
-
dataset_size: 171
|
30 |
-
configs:
|
31 |
-
- config_name: default
|
32 |
-
data_files:
|
33 |
-
- split: train
|
34 |
-
path: data/train-*
|
35 |
-
- split: test
|
36 |
-
path: data/test-*
|
37 |
-
- config_name: labels
|
38 |
-
data_files:
|
39 |
-
- split: train
|
40 |
-
path: labels/train-*
|
41 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
dataset_info:
|
3 |
+
- config_name: default
|
4 |
+
features:
|
5 |
+
- name: condition_label
|
6 |
+
dtype: int64
|
7 |
+
- name: medical_abstract
|
8 |
+
dtype: string
|
9 |
+
splits:
|
10 |
+
- name: train
|
11 |
+
num_bytes: 14334753
|
12 |
+
num_examples: 11550
|
13 |
+
- name: test
|
14 |
+
num_bytes: 3606846
|
15 |
+
num_examples: 2888
|
16 |
+
download_size: 9606491
|
17 |
+
dataset_size: 17941599
|
18 |
+
- config_name: labels
|
19 |
+
features:
|
20 |
+
- name: condition_label
|
21 |
+
dtype: int64
|
22 |
+
- name: condition_name
|
23 |
+
dtype: string
|
24 |
+
splits:
|
25 |
+
- name: train
|
26 |
+
num_bytes: 171
|
27 |
+
num_examples: 5
|
28 |
+
download_size: 1611
|
29 |
+
dataset_size: 171
|
30 |
+
configs:
|
31 |
+
- config_name: default
|
32 |
+
data_files:
|
33 |
+
- split: train
|
34 |
+
path: data/train-*
|
35 |
+
- split: test
|
36 |
+
path: data/test-*
|
37 |
+
- config_name: labels
|
38 |
+
data_files:
|
39 |
+
- split: train
|
40 |
+
path: labels/train-*
|
41 |
+
license: cc-by-sa-3.0
|
42 |
+
task_categories:
|
43 |
+
- text-classification
|
44 |
+
language:
|
45 |
+
- en
|
46 |
+
pretty_name: Medical Abstracts Text Classification Dataset
|
47 |
+
size_categories:
|
48 |
+
- 10K<n<100K
|
49 |
+
---
|
50 |
+
|
51 |
+
# Medical-Abstracts-TC-Corpus
|
52 |
+
This repository contains a medical abstracts dataset, describing 5 different classes of patient conditions. The dataset can be used for text classification.
|
53 |
+
|
54 |
+
|
55 |
+
📄 Paper: [Evaluating Unsupervised Text Classification: Zero-shot and Similarity-based Approaches (NLPIR 2022)](https://doi.org/10.1145/3582768.3582795).
|
56 |
+
|
57 |
+
💻 GitHub: [https://github.com/sebischair/Medical-Abstracts-TC-Corpus](https://github.com/sebischair/Medical-Abstracts-TC-Corpus)
|
58 |
+
|
59 |
+
Summary of the medical abstracts dataset:
|
60 |
+
|
61 |
+
* The `default` subset contains the train and test splits with numerical class labels.
|
62 |
+
* The `labels` subset contains the textual names of the numerical class labels.
|
63 |
+
|
64 |
+
| **Class name** | **#training** | **#test** | **Total** |
|
65 |
+
|---------------------------------|---------------|-----------|-----------|
|
66 |
+
| Neoplasms | 2530 | 633 | 3163 |
|
67 |
+
| Digestive system diseases | 1195 | 299 | 1494 |
|
68 |
+
| Nervous system diseases | 1540 | 385 | 1925 |
|
69 |
+
| Cardiovascular diseases | 2441 | 610 | 3051 |
|
70 |
+
| General pathological conditions | 3844 | 961 | 4805 |
|
71 |
+
| **Total** | **11550** | **2888** | **14438** |
|
72 |
+
|
73 |
+
## Citation information
|
74 |
+
|
75 |
+
This dataset was created during the writing of our paper titled [Evaluating Unsupervised Text Classification: Zero-shot and Similarity-based Approaches](https://doi.org/10.1145/3582768.3582795).
|
76 |
+
|
77 |
+
When citing this medical abstracts dataset in academic papers and theses, please use the following BibTeX entry:
|
78 |
+
```
|
79 |
+
@inproceedings{10.1145/3582768.3582795,
|
80 |
+
author = {Schopf, Tim and Braun, Daniel and Matthes, Florian},
|
81 |
+
title = {Evaluating Unsupervised Text Classification: Zero-Shot and Similarity-Based Approaches},
|
82 |
+
year = {2023},
|
83 |
+
isbn = {9781450397629},
|
84 |
+
publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
|
85 |
+
address = {New York, NY, USA},
|
86 |
+
url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3582768.3582795},
|
87 |
+
doi = {10.1145/3582768.3582795},
|
88 |
+
abstract = {Text classification of unseen classes is a challenging Natural Language Processing task and is mainly attempted using two different types of approaches. Similarity-based approaches attempt to classify instances based on similarities between text document representations and class description representations. Zero-shot text classification approaches aim to generalize knowledge gained from a training task by assigning appropriate labels of unknown classes to text documents. Although existing studies have already investigated individual approaches to these categories, the experiments in literature do not provide a consistent comparison. This paper addresses this gap by conducting a systematic evaluation of different similarity-based and zero-shot approaches for text classification of unseen classes. Different state-of-the-art approaches are benchmarked on four text classification datasets, including a new dataset from the medical domain. Additionally, novel SimCSE [7] and SBERT-based [26] baselines are proposed, as other baselines used in existing work yield weak classification results and are easily outperformed. Finally, the novel similarity-based Lbl2TransformerVec approach is presented, which outperforms previous state-of-the-art approaches in unsupervised text classification. Our experiments show that similarity-based approaches significantly outperform zero-shot approaches in most cases. Additionally, using SimCSE or SBERT embeddings instead of simpler text representations increases similarity-based classification results even further.},
|
89 |
+
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval},
|
90 |
+
pages = {6–15},
|
91 |
+
numpages = {10},
|
92 |
+
keywords = {Zero-shot Text Classification, Natural Language Processing, Unsupervised Text Classification},
|
93 |
+
location = {Bangkok, Thailand},
|
94 |
+
series = {NLPIR '22}
|
95 |
+
}
|
96 |
+
```
|