[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We2PPwe
'll3MDwill
hear4VVhear
argument5NNargument
next6JJnext
in7INin
Case8NPCase
17-14989CD@card@
,10,,
Atlantic11NPAtlantic
Richfield12NPRichfield
versus13CCversus
Christian14NPChristian
.15SENT.
Ms16NNMs
.17SENT.
Blatt18NPBlatt
.19SENT.
[MS. BLATT]20LOC[MS. BLATT]
Thank21VVthank
you22PPyou
,23,,
Mr24NPMr
.25SENT.
Chief26NPChief
Justice27NPJustice
,28,,
and29CCand
may30MDmay
it31PPit
please32VVplease
the33DTthe
Court34NPCourt
:35::
This36DTthis
case37NNcase
involves38VVZinvolve
whether39INwhether
the40DTthe
hundreds41NNShundred
of42INof
thousands43NNSthousand
of44INof
landowners45NNSlandowner
on46INon
Superfund47NPSuperfund
sites48NNSsite
can49MDcan
bring50VVbring
state51NNstate
lawsuits52NNSlawsuit
to53TOto
implement54VVimplement
their55PP$their
own56JJown
piecemeal57JJpiecemeal
hazardous58JJhazardous
waste59NNwaste
cleanups60NNScleanup
.61SENT.
The62DTthe
answer63NNanswer
should64MDshould
be65VBbe
no66RBno
.67SENT.
CERCLA68NPCERCLA
entrusts69VVZentrust
EPA70NPEPA
to71TOto
protect72VVprotect
human73JJhuman
health74NNhealth
and75CCand
the76DTthe
environment77NNenvironment
by78INby
developing79VVGdevelop
a80DTa
remedial81JJremedial
plan82NNplan
that83WDTthat
protects84VVZprotect
the85DTthe
whole86JJwhole
community87NNcommunity
.88SENT.
Respondents89NNSrespondent
are90VBPbe
profoundly91RBprofoundly
wrong92JJwrong
that93IN/thatthat
removing94VVGremove
waste95NNwaste
is96VBZbe
always97RBalways
better98RBRwell
than99INthan
leaving100VVGleave
it101PPit
in102INin
place103NNplace
.104SENT.
Superfund105NPSuperfund
sites106NNSsite
contain107VVPcontain
extremely108RBextremely
hazardous109JJhazardous
substances110NNSsubstance
,111,,
lead112NNlead
,113,,
mercury114NNmercury
,115,,
plutonium116NNplutonium
,117,,
to118TOto
name119VVname
a120DTa
few121JJfew
.122SENT.
Excavation123NNexcavation
,124,,
transportation125NNtransportation
,126,,
and127CCand
disposal128NNdisposal
of129INof
these130DTthese
substances131NNSsubstance
is132VBZbe
risky133JJrisky
not134RBnot
only135RBonly
to136TOto
neighbors137NNSneighbor
but138CCbut
the139DTthe
millions140NNSmillion
of141INof
people142NNSpeople
who143WPwho
live144VVPlive
next145JJnext
door146NNdoor
to147TOto
Superfund148NPSuperfund
sites149NNSsite
.150SENT.
Whether151INwhether
these152DTthese
risks153NNSrisk
are154VBPbe
worth155JJworth
any156DTany
benefits157NNSbenefit
should158MDshould
be159VBbe
evaluated160VVNevaluate
by161INby
EPA162NPEPA
,163,,
not164RBnot
juries165NNSjury
on166INon
an167DTan
ad168FWad
hoc169FWhoc
basis170NNbasis
.171SENT.
Since172INsince
2013173CD@card@
,174,,
EPA175NPEPA
has176VHZhave
objected177VVNobject
that178IN/thatthat
Respondents179NNSrespondent
'180POS'
restoration181NNrestoration
remedy182NNremedy
would183MDwould
thwart184VVthwart
more185JJRmore
than186INthan
three187CDthree
decades188NNSdecade
of189INof
efforts190NNSeffort
...191:...
of192INof
its193PP$its
efforts194NNSeffort
at195INat
the196DTthe
Anaconda197NNanaconda
site198NNsite
,199,,
including200VVGinclude
by201INby
digging202VVGdig
up203RPup
soil204NNsoil
that205IN/thatthat
EPA206NPEPA
wants207VVZwant
left208RBleft
undisturbed209JJundisturbed
and210CCand
by211INby
building212VVGbuild
miles213NNSmile
of214INof
underground215JJunderground
trenches216NNStrench
that217WDTthat
would218MDwould
affect219VVaffect
an220DTan
entire221JJentire
community222NNcommunity
's223POS's
groundwater224NNgroundwater
.225SENT.
This226DTthis
Court227NPCourt
should228MDshould
reverse229VVreverse
for230INfor
three231CDthree
reasons232NNSreason
.233SENT.
First234RBfirst
,235,,
Section236NNsection
113237CD@card@
bars238NNSbar
Respondents239NNSrespondent
'240POS'
challenge241NNchallenge
to242TOto
EPA243NPEPA
's244POS's
remedy245NNremedy
.246SENT.
Second247RBsecond
,248,,
Section249NNsection
122250CD@card@
bars251NNSbar
Respondents252NNSrespondent
from253INfrom
undertaking254VVGundertake
any255DTany
remedial256JJremedial
actions257NNSaction
absent258VVPabsent
EPA259NPEPA
's260POS's
authorization261NNauthorization
.262SENT.
And263CCand
,264,,
third265JJthird
,266,,
a267DTa
restoration268NNrestoration
remedy269NNremedy
is270VBZbe
preempted271VVNpreempt
because272INbecause
it273PPit
would274MDwould
require275VVrequire
Atlantic276NPAtlantic
Richfield277NPRichfield
to278TOto
effectuate279VVeffectuate
the280DTthe
very281JJvery
cleanup282NNcleanup
that283IN/thatthat
federal284JJfederal
law285NNlaw
prohibits286VVZprohibit
the287DTthe
company288NNcompany
from289INfrom
doing290VVGdo
on291INon
its292PP$its
own293JJown
,294,,
and295CCand
a296DTa
restoration297NNrestoration
remedy298NNremedy
would299MDwould
prevent300VVprevent
EPA301NPEPA
from302INfrom
carrying303VVGcarry
out304RPout
its305PP$its
statutory306JJstatutory
mandate307NNmandate
to308TOto
implement309VVimplement
comprehensive310JJcomprehensive
cleanups311NNScleanup
.312SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]313LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Ms314NNMs
.315SENT.
Blatt316NPBlatt
,317,,
I318PPI
've319VHPhave
been320VBNbe
trying321VVGtry
to322TOto
unpackage323VVunpackage
this324DTthis
case325NNcase
in326INin
my327PP$my
own328JJown
mind329NNmind
,330,,
and331CCand
I332PPI
start333VVPstart
with334INwith
the335DTthe
language336NNlanguage
of337INof
the338DTthe
statute339NNstatute
.340SENT.
I341PPI
'm342VBPbe
sorry343JJsorry
.344SENT.
I345PPI
interrupted346VVDinterrupt
you347PPyou
.348SENT.
Finish349NNfinish
.350SENT.
[MS. BLATT]351LOC[MS. BLATT]
No352NPNo
,353,,
we354PPwe
're355VBPbe
good356JJgood
.357SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]358LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Okay359NPOkay
.360SENT.
[361SYM[
LAUGHTER362NNlaughter
]363SYM]
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]364LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I365PPI
'm366VBPbe
sorry367JJsorry
.368SENT.
[MS. BLATT]369LOC[MS. BLATT]
No370NPNo
.371SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]372LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I373PPI
am374VBPbe
trying375VVGtry
to376TOto
figure377VVfigure
out378RPout
...379:...
let380VVlet
's381VBZbe
assume382VVassume
for383INfor
the384DTthe
sake385NNsake
of386INof
argument387NNargument
that388IN/thatthat
the389DTthe
remedial390JJremedial
plan391NNplan
that392IN/thatthat
the393DTthe
state394NNstate
court395NNcourt
orders396NNSorder
supplements397NNSsupplement
,398,,
rather399RBrather
than400INthan
contradicts401VVZcontradict
,402,,
the403DTthe
EPA404NPEPA
plan405NNplan
,406,,
that407IN/thatthat
it408PPit
was409VBDbe
something410NNsomething
in411INin
top412JJtop
of413INof
.414SENT.
I415PPI
read416VVPread
the417DTthe
savings418NNSsaving
clauses419NNSclause
to420TOto
permit421VVpermit
that422DTthat
.423SENT.
It424PPit
...425:...
the426DTthe
savings427NNSsaving
clauses428NNSclause
are429VBPbe
very430RBvery
explicit431JJexplicit
that432IN/thatthat
it433PPit
's434VBZbe
not435RBnot
displacing436VVGdisplace
or437CCor
intending438VVGintend
to439TOto
displace440VVdisplace
state441NNstate
law442NNlaw
remedies443NNSremedy
for444INfor
liability445NNliability
or446CCor
for447INfor
anything448NNanything
else449RBelse
.450SENT.
So451RBso
,452,,
if453INif
these454DTthese
plans455NNSplan
supplement456NNsupplement
,457,,
why458WRBwhy
would459MDwould
this460DTthis
part461NNpart
of462INof
Montana463NPMontana
law464NNlaw
be465VBbe
preempted466VVNpreempt
?467SENT?
[MS. BLATT]468LOC[MS. BLATT]
So469RBso
,470,,
in471INin
terms472NNSterm
of473INof
preemption474NNpreemption
,475,,
so476RBso
it477PPit
's478VBZbe
quite479RBquite
emphatic480JJemphatic
to481TOto
understand482VVunderstand
that483DTthat
Section484NNsection
122485CD@card@
(486((
e487LSe
)488))
(489((
6490CD6
)491))
and492CCand
the493DTthe
over494INover
20495CD@card@
administrative496JJadministrative
orders497NNSorder
impose498VVimpose
both499CCboth
a500DTa
floor501NNfloor
and502CCand
a503DTa
ceiling504NNceiling
on505INon
the506DTthe
type507NNtype
of508INof
cleanup509NNcleanup
...510:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]511LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
If512INif
I513PPI
disagree514VVPdisagree
that515IN/thatthat
it516PPit
's517VBZbe
a518DTa
ceiling519NNceiling
...520:...
[MS. BLATT]521LOC[MS. BLATT]
Well522UHWell
...523:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]524LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...525:...
if526INif
I527PPI
think528VVPthink
it529PPit
's530VBZbe
just531RBjust
a532DTa
flaw533NNflaw
...534:...
a535DTa
floor536NNfloor
...537:...
[MS. BLATT]538LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure539NPSure
.540SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]541LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...542:...
and543CCand
that544IN/thatthat
the545DTthe
EPA546NPEPA
has547VHZhave
the548DTthe
power549NNpower
to550TOto
decide551VVdecide
whether552INwhether
any553DTany
plan554NNplan
can555MDcan
supplement556VVsupplement
its557PP$its
own558JJown
...559:...
[MS. BLATT]560LOC[MS. BLATT]
Of561INof
course562NNcourse
.563SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]564LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...565:...
where566WRBwhere
does567VVZdo
that568RBthat
leave569VVleave
this570DTthis
argument571NNargument
?572SENT?
[MS. BLATT]573LOC[MS. BLATT]
So574INso
you575PPyou
...576:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]577LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
If578INif
...579:...
if580INif
...581:...
if582INif
...583:...
if584INif
I585PPI
believe586VVPbelieve
...587:...
[MS. BLATT]588LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure589NPSure
.590SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]591LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...592:...
that593IN/thatthat
it594PPit
's595VBZbe
a596DTa
...597:...
it598PPit
's599VBZbe
a600DTa
floor601NNfloor
only602RBonly
,603,,
not604RBnot
a605DTa
ceiling606NNceiling
...607:...
[MS. BLATT]608LOC[MS. BLATT]
Uh-huh609NPUh-huh
.610SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]611LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...612:...
that613IN/thatthat
the614DTthe
EPA615NPEPA
has616VHZhave
the617DTthe
right618NNright
to619TOto
establish620VVestablish
when621WRBwhen
a622DTa
plan623NNplan
will624MDwill
be625VBbe
a626DTa
ceiling627NNceiling
,628,,
where629WRBwhere
does630VVZdo
that631RBthat
leave632VVleave
this633DTthis
case634NNcase
?635SENT?
[MS. BLATT]636LOC[MS. BLATT]
Okay637NPOkay
.638SENT.
So639RBso
,640,,
in641INin
terms642NNSterm
of643INof
conflict644NNconflict
preemption645NNpreemption
,646,,
so647RBso
we648PPwe
know649VVPknow
that650IN/thatthat
EPA651NPEPA
would652MDwould
absolutely653RBabsolutely
have654VHhave
to655TOto
change656VVchange
federal657JJfederal
law658NNlaw
,659,,
which660WDTwhich
it661PPit
could662MDcould
,663,,
to664TOto
approve665VVapprove
their666PP$their
plan667NNplan
.668SENT.
So669RBso
you670PPyou
're671VBPbe
absolutely672RBabsolutely
correct673JJcorrect
.674SENT.
The675DTthe
EP676NPEP
...677:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]678LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I679PPI
'm680VBPbe
sorry681JJsorry
.682SENT.
[MS. BLATT]683LOC[MS. BLATT]
EP684NPEP
...685:...
federal686JJfederal
law687NNlaw
requires688VVZrequire
a689DTa
specific690JJspecific
action691NNaction
level692NNlevel
and693CCand
a694DTa
specific695JJspecific
amount696NNamount
of697INof
dirt698NNdirt
that699WDTthat
can700MDcan
be701VBbe
dug702VVNdug
and703CCand
that704IN/thatthat
no705DTno
wall706NNwall
could707MDcould
be708VBbe
built709VVNbuild
.710SENT.
If711INif
that712DTthat
happens713VVZhappen
,714,,
EPA715NPEPA
...716:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]717LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
At718INat
the719DTthe
moment720NNmoment
?721SENT?
[MS. BLATT]722LOC[MS. BLATT]
Yes723NPYes
.724SENT.
And725CCand
EPA726NPEPA
can727MDcan
change728VVchange
it729PPit
.730SENT.
And731CCand
this732DTthis
Court733NPCourt
in734INin
Mensing735NPMensing
said736VVDsay
that737IN/thatthat
courts738NNScourt
do739VVPdo
not740RBnot
withhold741VVwithhold
preemption742NNpreemption
based743VVNbase
on744INon
the745DTthe
speculation746NNspeculation
that747IN/thatthat
federal748JJfederal
government749NNgovernment
may750MDmay
change751VVchange
the752DTthe
law753NNlaw
.754SENT.
And755CCand
the756DTthe
law757NNlaw
would758MDwould
have759VHhave
to760TOto
be761VBbe
...762:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]763LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But764CCbut
it765PPit
is766VBZbe
n't767RBn't
the768DTthe
law769NNlaw
,770,,
Ms771NNMs
.772SENT.
Blatt773NPBlatt
.774SENT.
It's775NPIt's
...776:...
it777PPit
's778VBZbe
the779DTthe
EPA780NPEPA
Superfund781NPSuperfund
plan782NNplan
for783INfor
this784DTthis
site785NNsite
.786SENT.
The787DTthe
specific788JJspecific
things789NNSthing
that790IN/thatthat
you791PPyou
mention792VVPmention
are793VBPbe
not794RBnot
in795INin
the796DTthe
law797NNlaw
.798SENT.
They799PPthey
are800VBPbe
in801INin
the802DTthe
EPA803NPEPA
's804POS's
plan805NNplan
.806SENT.
And807CCand
if808INif
the809DTthe
EPA810NPEPA
said811VVDsay
we812PPwe
permit813VVPpermit
what814WPwhat
the815DTthe
landowners816NNSlandowner
...817:...
the818DTthe
...819:...
the820DTthe
further821JJRfurther
cleanup822NNcleanup
the823DTthe
landowners824NNSlandowner
want825VVPwant
,826,,
we827PPwe
permit828VVPpermit
it829PPit
or830CCor
we831PPwe
permit832VVPpermit
what833WPwhat
they834PPthey
want835VVPwant
with836INwith
certain837JJcertain
modifications838NNSmodification
,839,,
if840INif
EPA841NPEPA
says842VVZsay
yes843UHyes
,844,,
then845RBthen
there846EXthere
's847VBZbe
no848DTno
preemption849NNpreemption
that850IN/thatthat
I851PPI
could852MDcould
see853VVsee
that854WDTthat
would855MDwould
be856VBbe
involved857VVNinvolve
in858INin
this859DTthis
case860NNcase
.861SENT.
[MS. BLATT]862LOC[MS. BLATT]
So863INso
that864WDTthat
's865VBZbe
not866RBnot
correct867JJcorrect
because868INbecause
,869,,
when870WRBwhen
you871PPyou
said872VVDsay
plan873NNplan
...874:...
and875CCand
maybe876RBmaybe
I877PPI
misspoke878VVZmisspoke
...879:...
the880DTthe
law881NNlaw
is882VBZbe
not883RBnot
a884DTa
U885NPU
.886SENT.
S887NPS
.888SENT.
code889NNcode
law890NNlaw
.891SENT.
It892PPit
's893VBZbe
a894DTa
binding895JJbinding
administrative896JJadministrative
order897NNorder
where898WRBwhere
Atlantic899NPAtlantic
Richfield900NPRichfield
would901MDwould
incur902VVincur
massive903JJmassive
penalties904NNSpenalty
every905DTevery
day906NNday
if907INif
it908PPit
violated909VVDviolate
.910SENT.
It911PPit
's912VBZbe
a913DTa
law914NNlaw
in915INin
terms916NNSterm
of917INof
an918DTan
administrative919JJadministrative
order920NNorder
that921WDTthat
sets922VVZset
forth923RBforth
the924DTthe
plan925NNplan
.926SENT.
Now927RBnow
Atlantic928NPAtlantic
Richfield929NPRichfield
cannot930MDcan
carry931VVcarry
out932RPout
that933DTthat
plan934NNplan
without935INwithout
massive936JJmassive
fines937NNSfine
and938CCand
violating939VVGviolate
law940NNlaw
.941SENT.
In942INin
the943DTthe
order944NNorder
,945,,
it946PPit
says947VVZsay
undertaking948VVGundertake
any949DTany
action950NNaction
without951INwithout
EPA952NPEPA
's953POS's
approval954NNapproval
violates955VVZviolate
the956DTthe
order957NNorder
.958SENT.
And959CCand
under960INunder
ordinary961JJordinary
...962:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]963LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But964CCbut
suppose965VVsuppose
the966DTthe
EPA967NPEPA
approves968VVZapprove
.969SENT.
The970DTthe
EPA971NPEPA
says972VVZsay
what973WPwhat
you974PPyou
want975VVPwant
to976TOto
do977VVdo
is978VBZbe
okay979JJokay
with980INwith
us981PPus
,982,,
or983CCor
at984INat
least985JJSleast
,986,,
as987RBas
was988VBDbe
suggested989VVNsuggest
in990INin
the991DTthe
briefing992NNbriefing
,993,,
part994NNpart
of995INof
what996WPwhat
the997DTthe
landowners998NNSlandowner
want999VVPwant
is1000VBZbe
okay1001JJokay
with1002INwith
EPA1003NPEPA
.1004SENT.
[MS. BLATT]1005LOC[MS. BLATT]
So1006INso
all1007DTall
of1008INof
the1009DTthe
pillars1010NNSpillar
of1011INof
their1012PP$their
plan1013NNplan
violate1014VVviolate
EPA1015NPEPA
's1016POS's
order1017NNorder
.1018SENT.
And1019CCand
your1020PP$your
supposition1021NNsupposition
that1022IN/thatthat
EPA1023NPEPA
could1024MDcould
approve1025VVapprove
it1026PPit
is1027VBZbe
just1028RBjust
not1029RBnot
the1030DTthe
test1031NNtest
under1032INunder
preemption1033NNpreemption
.1034SENT.
The1035DTthe
test1036NNtest
under1037INunder
preemption1038NNpreemption
is1039VBZbe
whether1040INwhether
a1041DTa
party1042NNparty
today1043NNtoday
could1044MDcould
independently1045RBindependently
do1046VVdo
under1047INunder
federal1048JJfederal
law1049NNlaw
what1050WPwhat
state1051VVPstate
law1052NNlaw
requires1053VVZrequire
.1054SENT.
And1055CCand
I1056PPI
mean1057VVPmean
by1058INby
that1059DTthat
,1060,,
and1061CCand
what1062WPwhat
this1063DTthis
Court1064NPCourt
in1065INin
Mensing1066NPMensing
and1067CCand
Bartlett1068NPBartlett
said1069VVDsay
,1070,,
that1071WDTthat
means1072VVZmean
complying1073VVGcomply
with1074INwith
state1075NNstate
law1076NNlaw
duties1077NNSduty
without1078INwithout
the1079DTthe
government1080NNgovernment
's1081POS's
assistance1082NNassistance
and1083CCand
permission1084NNpermission
.1085SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1086LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well1087UHWell
,1088,,
Ms1089NNMs
.1090SENT.
Blatt1091NPBlatt
,1092,,
same1093JJsame
kind1094NNkind
of1095INof
question1096NNquestion
,1097,,
and1098CCand
maybe1099RBmaybe
it1100PPit
goes1101VVZgo
to1102TOto
a1103DTa
bunch1104NNbunch
of1105INof
your1106PP$your
arguments1107NNSargument
.1108SENT.
I1109PPI
mean1110VVPmean
,1111,,
look1112VVPlook
,1113,,
if1114INif
I1115PPI
were1116VBDbe
writing1117VVGwrite
this1118DTthis
statute1119NNstatute
,1120,,
I1121PPI
would1122MDwould
say1123VVsay
it1124PPit
all1125RBall
goes1126VVZgo
to1127TOto
the1128DTthe
EPA1129NPEPA
.1130SENT.
It1131PPit
's1132VBZbe
just1133RBjust
...1134:...
you1135PPyou
know1136VVPknow
,1137,,
that1138WDTthat
's1139VBZbe
the1140DTthe
sensible1141JJsensible
solution1142NNsolution
to1143TOto
have1144VHhave
one1145CDone
party1146NNparty
that1147WDTthat
makes1148VVZmake
all1149PDTall
the1150DTthe
rules1151NNSrule
in1152INin
this1153DTthis
.1154SENT.
But1155CCbut
I1156PPI
'm1157VBPbe
not1158RBnot
writing1159VVGwrite
the1160DTthe
statute1161NNstatute
.1162SENT.
And1163CCand
the1164DTthe
statute1165NNstatute
has1166VHZhave
three1167CDthree
savings1168NNSsaving
clauses1169NNSclause
in1170INin
it1171PPit
,1172,,
which1173WDTwhich
...1174:...
which1175WDTwhich
suggests1176VVZsuggest
that1177IN/thatthat
the1178DTthe
states1179NNSstate
have1180VHPhave
a1181DTa
significant1182JJsignificant
role1183NNrole
in1184INin
this1185DTthis
.1186SENT.
And1187CCand
,1188,,
in1189INin
particular1190JJparticular
,1191,,
one1192CDone
that1193WDTthat
says1194VVZsay
that1195IN/thatthat
the1196DTthe
states1197NNSstate
get1198VVPget
to1199TOto
impose1200VVimpose
additional1201JJadditional
liability1202NNliability
or1203CCor
requirements1204NNSrequirement
with1205INwith
respect1206NNrespect
to1207TOto
the1208DTthe
release1209NNrelease
of1210INof
hazardous1211JJhazardous
substances1212NNSsubstance
.1213SENT.
And1214CCand
I1215PPI
guess1216VVPguess
,1217,,
you1218PPyou
know1219VVPknow
,1220,,
one1221CDone
way1222NNway
into1223INinto
this1224DTthis
is1225VBZbe
if1226INif
I1227PPI
...1228:...
if1229INif
...1230:...
if1231INif
...1232:...
if1233INif
we1234PPwe
imagine1235VVPimagine
that1236IN/thatthat
this1237DTthis
was1238VBDbe
done1239VVNdo
not1240RBnot
with1241INwith
a1242DTa
damages1243NNSdamage
rule1244NNrule
,1245,,
but1246CCbut
suppose1247VVPsuppose
the1248DTthe
Montana1249NPMontana
legislature1250NNlegislature
just1251RBjust
said1252VVDsay
,1253,,
you1254PPyou
know1255VVPknow
what1256WPwhat
,1257,,
this1258DTthis
plan1259NNplan
that1260IN/thatthat
the1261DTthe
EPA1262NPEPA
has1263VHZhave
put1264VVNput
in1265INin
place1266NNplace
,1267,,
it1268PPit
requires1269VVZrequire
arsenic1270NNarsenic
at1271INat
a1272DTa
certain1273JJcertain
level1274NNlevel
,1275,,
and1276CCand
we1277PPwe
think1278VVPthink
it1279PPit
would1280MDwould
be1281VBbe
better1282JJRgood
to1283TOto
lower1284VVlower
that1285IN/thatthat
,1286,,
and1287CCand
we1288PPwe
do1289VVPdo
n't1290RBn't
really1291RBreally
care1292VVcare
that1293IN/thatthat
the1294DTthe
EPA1295NPEPA
thinks1296VVZthink
that1297IN/thatthat
that1298DTthat
would1299MDwould
not1300RBnot
be1301VBbe
a1302DTa
good1303JJgood
idea1304NNidea
for1305INfor
health1306NNhealth
purposes1307NNSpurpose
,1308,,
as1309RBas
well1310RBwell
as1311INas
for1312INfor
economic1313JJeconomic
purposes1314NNSpurpose
;1315:;
we1316PPwe
think1317VVPthink
that1318IN/thatthat
that1319DTthat
arsenic1320JJarsenic
level1321NNlevel
should1322MDshould
be1323VBbe
lowered1324VVNlower
.1325SENT.
Do1326VVPdo
you1327PPyou
think1328VVPthink
that1329IN/thatthat
the1330DTthe
state1331NNstate
gets1332VVZget
to1333TOto
do1334VVdo
that1335DTthat
?1336SENT?
[MS. BLATT]1337LOC[MS. BLATT]
No1338NPNo
,1339,,
and1340CCand
Section1341NPSection
1211342CD@card@
deals1343NNSdeal
with1344INwith
this1345DTthis
directly1346RBdirectly
.1347SENT.
It1348PPit
spells1349VVZspell
out1350RPout
in1351INin
like1352INlike
over1353RBover
3,0001354CD@card@
words1355NNSword
how1356WRBhow
states1357NNSstate
can1358MDcan
incorporate1359VVincorporate
into1360INinto
EPA's1361NPEPA's
,1362,,
their1363PP$their
plans1364NNSplan
,1365,,
and1366CCand
EPA1367NPEPA
can1368MDcan
override1369VVoverride
that1370DTthat
state1371NNstate
standard1372NNstandard
.1373SENT.
And1374CCand
it1375PPit
goes1376VVZgo
...1377:...
then1378RBthen
states1379NNSstate
have1380VHPhave
the1381DTthe
remedy1382NNremedy
to1383TOto
sue1384VVsue
.1385SENT.
It1386PPit
's1387VBZbe
one1388CDone
of1389INof
the1390DTthe
exceptions1391NNSexception
under1392INunder
1131393CD@card@
.1394SENT.
And1395CCand
so1396RBso
...1397:...
and1398CCand
I1399PPI
think1400VVPthink
you1401PPyou
're1402VBPbe
right1403JJright
that1404IN/thatthat
their1405PP$their
position1406NNposition
under1407INunder
the1408DTthe
savings1409NNSsaving
clause1410NNclause
is1411VBZbe
that1412IN/thatthat
not1413RBnot
only1414RBonly
could1415MDcould
state1416VVstate
law1417NNlaw
say1418VVPsay
do1419VVPdo
n't1420RBn't
enact1421VVenact
EPA1422NPEPA
's1423POS's
remedy1424NNremedy
because1425INbecause
we1426PPwe
hate1427VVPhate
it1428PPit
and1429CCand
do1430VVPdo
a1431DTa
different1432JJdifferent
remedy1433NNremedy
,1434,,
but1435CCbut
state1436NNstate
courts1437NNScourt
could1438MDcould
order1439VVorder
independent1440JJindependent
warring1441VVGwar
cleanups1442NNScleanup
,1443,,
you1444PPyou
know1445VVPknow
,1446,,
case1447NNcase
by1448INby
case1449NNcase
,1450,,
block1451NNblock
by1452INby
block1453NNblock
,1454,,
house1455NNhouse
by1456INby
house1457NNhouse
.1458SENT.
And1459CCand
this1460DTthis
Court1461NPCourt
,1462,,
in1463INin
the1464DTthe
Abilene1465NPAbilene
Cotton1466NPCotton
case1467NNcase
and1468CCand
in1469INin
the1470DTthe
AT1471INat
&1472CC&
T1473NNT
case1474NNcase
,1475,,
interpreted1476VVDinterpret
almost1477RBalmost
an1478DTan
identically1479RBidentically
worded1480VVNword
savings1481NNSsaving
clause1482NNclause
and1483CCand
said1484VVDsay
you1485PPyou
can1486MDcan
't1487RB't
interpret1488VVinterpret
those1489DTthose
clauses1490NNSclause
to1491TOto
completely1492RBcompletely
destroy1493VVdestroy
other1494JJother
parts1495NNSpart
of1496INof
the1497DTthe
Act1498NPAct
.1499SENT.
And1500CCand
this1501DTthis
would1502MDwould
utterly1503RButterly
destroy1504VVdestroy
EPA1505NPEPA
's1506POS's
whole1507JJwhole
design1508NNdesign
under1509INunder
CERCLA1510NPCERCLA
.1511SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]1512LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
So1513RBso
...1514:...
so1515RBso
what1516WPwhat
...1517:...
what1518WPwhat
do1519VVPdo
they1520PPthey
save1521VVsave
then1522RBthen
?1523SENT?
I1524PPI
mean1525VVPmean
,1526,,
the1527DTthe
savings1528NNsavings
is1529VBZbe
all1530RBall
over1531INover
this1532DTthis
statute1533NNstatute
.1534SENT.
They1535PPthey
have1536VHPhave
to1537TOto
save1538VVsave
something1539NNsomething
.1540SENT.
What1541WPWhat
do1542VVPdo
they1543PPthey
save1544VVsave
that1545DTthat
...1546:...
that1547IN/thatthat
states1548NNSstate
can1549MDcan
do1550VVdo
independently1551RBindependently
?1552SENT?
[MS. BLATT]1553LOC[MS. BLATT]
So1554RBso
let1555VVlet
...1556:...
let1557VVlet
me1558PPme
be1559VBbe
very1560RBvery
clear1561JJclear
how1562WRBhow
narrow1563JJnarrow
our1564PP$our
argument1565NNargument
is1566VBZbe
.1567SENT.
They1568PPthey
have1569VHPhave
four1570CDfour
...1571:...
four1572CDfour
claims1573NNSclaim
of1574INof
compensatory1575JJcompensatory
damages1576NNSdamage
and1577CCand
punitive1578JJpunitive
damages1579NNSdamage
.1580SENT.
So1581INso
typical1582JJtypical
state1583NNstate
law1584NNlaw
claims1585NNSclaim
for1586INfor
nuisance1587JJnuisance
and1588CCand
whatever1589WDTwhatever
else1590NNelse
they1591PPthey
want1592VVPwant
to1593TOto
claim1594VVclaim
for1595INfor
damages1596NNSdamage
is1597VBZbe
fine1598JJfine
.1599SENT.
The1600DTthe
objection1601NNobjection
here1602RBhere
is1603VBZbe
that1604IN/thatthat
the1605DTthe
actual1606JJactual
remedy1607NNremedy
orders1608NNSorder
Atlantic1609NPAtlantic
Richfield1610NPRichfield
to1611TOto
pay1612VVpay
Respondents1613NNSrespondent
to1614TOto
carry1615VVcarry
out1616RPout
their1617PP$their
contrary1618JJcontrary
plan1619NNplan
and1620CCand
that1621IN/thatthat
Respondents1622NNSrespondent
under1623INunder
state1624NNstate
law1625NNlaw
must1626MDmust
actually1627RBactually
implement1628VVimplement
the1629DTthe
very1630JJvery
plan1631NNplan
that1632IN/thatthat
Atlantic1633NPAtlantic
Richfield1634NPRichfield
would1635MDwould
violate1636VVviolate
federal1637JJfederal
law1638NNlaw
.1639SENT.
So1640RBso
this1641DTthis
is1642VBZbe
a1643DTa
...1644:...
not1645RBnot
only1646RBonly
a1647DTa
challenge1648NNchallenge
and1649CCand
not1650RBnot
only1651RBonly
its1652PP$its
direct1653JJdirect
remedial1654JJremedial
action1655NNaction
that1656WDTthat
has1657VHZhave
to1658TOto
be1659VBbe
taken1660VVNtake
in1661INin
violation1662NNviolation
of1663INof
1221664CD@card@
,1665,,
but1666CCbut
it1667PPit
's1668VBZbe
the1669DTthe
only1670JJonly
claim1671NNclaim
that1672WDTthat
would1673MDwould
meet1674VVmeet
our1675PP$our
standard1676NNstandard
of1677INof
conflict1678NNconflict
preemption1679NNpreemption
because1680INbecause
it1681PPit
requires1682VVZrequire
Atlantic1683NPAtlantic
Richfield1684NPRichfield
to1685TOto
effectuate1686VVeffectuate
a1687DTa
violation1688NNviolation
of1689INof
federal1690JJfederal
law1691NNlaw
,1692,,
either1693CCeither
whether1694INwhether
they1695PPthey
hire1696VVPhire
their1697PP$their
own1698JJown
employees1699NNSemployee
or1700CCor
whether1701INwhether
they1702PPthey
hire1703VVPhire
the1704DTthe
plaintiff1705NNplaintiff
's1706POS's
employees1707NNSemployee
and1708CCand
put1709VVput
a1710DTa
different1711JJdifferent
hard1712JJhard
hat1713NNhat
or1714CCor
give1715VVgive
them1716PPthem
a1717DTa
different1718JJdifferent
...1719:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1720LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Ms1721NNMs
.1722SENT.
Blatt1723NPBlatt
...1724:...
[MS. BLATT]1725LOC[MS. BLATT]
...1726:...
shovel1727NNshovel
.1728SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1729LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...1730:...
if1731INif
...1732:...
if1733INif
I1734PPI
have1735VHPhave
questions1736NNSquestion
about1737INabout
what1738WPwhat
state1739NNstate
law1740NNlaw
requires1741VVZrequire
,1742,,
because1743INbecause
I1744PPI
...1745:...
I1746PPI
can1747MDcan
't1748RB't
find1749VVfind
anything1750NNanything
in1751INin
the1752DTthe
state1753NNstate
law1754NNlaw
that1755WDTthat
requires1756VVZrequire
a1757DTa
damages1758NNSdamage
remedy1759VVPremedy
to1760TOto
be1761VBbe
put1762VVNput
in1763INin
trust1764NNtrust
for1765INfor
the1766DTthe
remediation1767NNremediation
,1768,,
that1769WDTthat
's1770VBZbe
what1771WPwhat
the1772DTthe
court1773NNcourt
below1774RBbelow
said1775VVDsay
.1776SENT.
I1777PPI
know1778VVPknow
that1779DTthat
's1780VBZbe
what1781WPwhat
it1782PPit
said1783VVDsay
.1784SENT.
But1785CCbut
I1786PPI
can1787MDcan
't1788RB't
find1789VVfind
any1790DTany
law1791NNlaw
that1792WDTthat
says1793VVZsay
that1794DTthat
's1795VBZbe
what1796WPwhat
has1797VHZhave
to1798TOto
happen1799VVhappen
...1800:...
[MS. BLATT]1801LOC[MS. BLATT]
Uh-huh1802NPUh-huh
.1803SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1804LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...1805:...
number1806NNnumber
one1807CDone
.1808SENT.
Number1809NNnumber
two1810CDtwo
,1811,,
I1812PPI
can1813MDcan
't1814RB't
find1815VVfind
any1816DTany
state1817NNstate
law1818NNlaw
requirement1819NNrequirement
that1820IN/thatthat
the1821DTthe
Petitioner1822NNpetitioner
has1823VHZhave
to1824TOto
prove1825VVprove
that1826IN/thatthat
they1827PPthey
're1828VBPbe
going1829VVGgo
to1830TOto
actually1831RBactually
use1832VVuse
the1833DTthe
money1834NNmoney
they1835PPthey
're1836VBPbe
awarded1837VVNaward
for1838INfor
the1839DTthe
purposes1840NNSpurpose
that1841WDTthat
they1842PPthey
claim1843VVPclaim
.1844SENT.
So1845RBso
I1846PPI
'm1847VBPbe
very1848RBvery
confused1849VVNconfuse
about1850INabout
the1851DTthe
state1852NNstate
law1853NNlaw
question1854NNquestion
.1855SENT.
[MS. BLATT]1856LOC[MS. BLATT]
Yeah1857NPYeah
.1858SENT.
And1859CCand
I1860PPI
think1861VVPthink
that1862WDTthat
's1863VBZbe
all1864PDTall
a1865DTa
fair1866JJfair
question1867NNquestion
.1868SENT.
And1869CCand
...1870:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1871LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
If1872INif
it1873PPit
is1874VBZbe
a1875DTa
fair1876JJfair
question1877NNquestion
...1878:...
[MS. BLATT]1879LOC[MS. BLATT]
Yeah1880UHYeah
,1881,,
I1882PPI
was1883VBDbe
going1884VVGgo
to1885TOto
answer1886VVanswer
it1887PPit
.1888SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1889LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...1890:...
why1891WRBwhy
is1892VBZbe
it1893PPit
preempted1894VVDpreempt
,1895,,
meaning1896VVGmean
why1897WRBwhy
would1898MDwould
n't1899RBn't
I1900PPI
just1901RBjust
remand1902VVPremand
this1903DTthis
case1904NNcase
and1905CCand
say1906VVPsay
you1907PPyou
can1908MDcan
't1909RB't
make1910VVmake
...1911:...
you1912PPyou
can1913MDcan
't1914RB't
award1915NNaward
damages1916NNSdamage
unless1917INunless
the1918DTthe
other1919JJother
side1920NNside
proves1921VVZprove
or1922CCor
the1923DTthe
side1924NNside
claiming1925VVGclaim
these1926DTthese
damages1927NNSdamage
proves1928VVZprove
that1929IN/thatthat
it1930PPit
can1931MDcan
get1932VVget
EPA1933NPEPA
approval1934NNapproval
of1935INof
whatever1936WDTwhatever
it1937PPit
wants1938VVZwant
to1939TOto
do1940VVdo
,1941,,
and1942CCand
that1943IN/thatthat
it1944PPit
will1945MDwill
,1946,,
in1947INin
fact1948NNfact
,1949,,
only1950RBonly
use1951VVuse
that1952DTthat
award1953NNaward
for1954INfor
those1955DTthose
purposes1956NNSpurpose
?1957SENT?
[MS. BLATT]1958LOC[MS. BLATT]
Right1959RBright
.1960SENT.
So1961RBso
...1962:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1963LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
What1964WPWhat
's1965VBZbe
wrong1966JJwrong
with1967INwith
a1968DTa
ruling1969NNruling
that1970WDTthat
's1971VBZbe
just1972RBjust
that1973DTthat
basic1974NNbasic
that1975WDTthat
says1976VVZsay
you1977PPyou
can1978MDcan
get1979VVget
more1980JJRmore
if1981INif
you1982PPyou
can1983MDcan
prove1984VVprove
the1985DTthe
EPA1986NPEPA
will1987MDwill
give1988VVgive
you1989PPyou
more1990JJRmore
,1991,,
as1992RBas
simple1993JJsimple
as1994INas
that1995DTthat
?1996SENT?
[MS. BLATT]1997LOC[MS. BLATT]
So1998INso
you1999PPyou
know2000VVPknow
...2001:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2002LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
What2003WPWhat
's2004VBZbe
wrong2005JJwrong
with2006INwith
that2007DTthat
...2008:...
[MS. BLATT]2009LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure2010NPSure
.2011SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2012LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...2013:...
kind2014NNkind
of2015INof
opinion2016NNopinion
?2017SENT?
[MS. BLATT]2018LOC[MS. BLATT]
So2019INso
you2020PPyou
took2021VVDtake
this2022DTthis
case2023NNcase
on2024INon
the2025DTthe
assumption2026NNassumption
...2027:...
and2028CCand
we2029PPwe
cite2030VVPcite
it2031PPit
on2032INon
page2033NNpage
162034CD@card@
of2035INof
our2036PP$our
reply2037NNreply
brief2038NNbrief
...2039:...
all2040PDTall
the2041DTthe
places2042NNSplace
where2043WRBwhere
the2044DTthe
Respondent2045NNrespondent
concedes2046VVZconcede
,2047,,
and2048CCand
the2049DTthe
Montana2050NPMontana
Supreme2051NPSupreme
Court2052NPCourt
expressly2053RBexpressly
said2054VVDsay
,2055,,
that2056IN/thatthat
this2057DTthis
money2058NNmoney
has2059VHZhave
to2060TOto
be2061VBbe
used2062VVNuse
to2063TOto
carry2064VVcarry
out2065RPout
the2066DTthe
remedy2067NNremedy
.2068SENT.
And2069CCand
that2070DTthat
's2071VBZbe
the2072DTthe
way2073NNway
this2074DTthis
case2075NNcase
comes2076VVZcome
up2077RPup
.2078SENT.
If2079INif
you2080PPyou
want2081VVPwant
to2082TOto
know2083VVknow
the2084DTthe
reason2085NNreason
for2086INfor
Sunburst2087NNsunburst
,2088,,
it2089PPit
's2090VBZbe
because2091INbecause
of2092INof
the2093DTthe
reason2094NNreason
is2095VBZbe
personal2096JJpersonal
.2097SENT.
So2098RBso
,2099,,
if2100INif
you2101PPyou
own2102VVPown
a2103DTa
property2104NNproperty
and2105CCand
love2106VVlove
it2107PPit
so2108RBso
much2109RBmuch
and2110CCand
you2111PPyou
do2112VVPdo
n't2113RBn't
have2114VHhave
any2115DTany
damages2116NNSdamage
,2117,,
the2118DTthe
whole2119JJwhole
point2120NNpoint
of2121INof
the2122DTthe
restoration2123NNrestoration
remedy2124NNremedy
to2125TOto
avoid2126VVavoid
the2127DTthe
windfall2128NNwindfall
is2129VBZbe
you2130PPyou
have2131VHPhave
to2132TOto
spend2133VVspend
the2134DTthe
money2135NNmoney
.2136SENT.
So2137RBso
I2138PPI
'm2139VBPbe
quite2140RBquite
confident2141JJconfident
that2142IN/thatthat
I2143PPI
'm2144VBPbe
accurately2145RBaccurately
stating2146VVGstate
Montana2147NPMontana
law2148NNlaw
and2149CCand
that2150IN/thatthat
Respondents2151NNSrespondent
never2152RBnever
argued2153VVDargue
to2154TOto
the2155DTthe
contrary2156NNcontrary
.2157SENT.
And2158CCand
in2159INin
our2160PP$our
reply2161NNreply
brief2162NNbrief
,2163,,
again2164RBagain
,2165,,
we2166PPwe
cite2167VVPcite
all2168PDTall
the2169DTthe
concessions2170NNSconcession
,2171,,
including2172VVGinclude
,2173,,
I2174PPI
think2175VVPthink
,2176,,
the2177DTthe
opinion2178NNopinion
below2179INbelow
in2180INin
three2181CDthree
places2182NNSplace
says2183VVZsay
the2184DTthe
money2185NNmoney
has2186VHZhave
to2187TOto
go2188VVgo
to2189TOto
a2190DTa
trustee2191NNtrustee
and2192CCand
that2193IN/thatthat
money2194NNmoney
has2195VHZhave
to2196TOto
be2197VBbe
spent2198VVNspend
on2199INon
the2200DTthe
cleanup2201NNcleanup
.2202SENT.
And2203CCand
I2204PPI
'm2205VBPbe
agreeing2206VVGagree
with2207INwith
you2208PPyou
that2209IN/thatthat
key2210JJkey
to2211TOto
the2212DTthe
preemption2213NNpreemption
argument2214NNargument
is2215VBZbe
that2216IN/thatthat
under2217INunder
state2218NNstate
law2219NNlaw
,2220,,
they2221PPthey
will2222MDwill
be2223VBbe
forced2224VVNforce
to2225TOto
carry2226VVcarry
out2227RPout
a2228DTa
remedy2229NNremedy
that2230WDTthat
would2231MDwould
violate2232VVviolate
EPA2233NPEPA
's2234POS's
orders2235NNSorder
,2236,,
these2237DTthese
administrative2238JJadministrative
orders2239NNSorder
,2240,,
if2241INif
we2242PPwe
carried2243VVDcarry
it2244PPit
out2245INout
itself2246PPitself
.2247SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2248LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So2249INso
what2250WPwhat
's2251VBZbe
wrong2252JJwrong
with2253INwith
an2254DTan
opinion2255NNopinion
that2256IN/thatthat
we2257PPwe
write2258VVPwrite
that2259DTthat
says2260VVZsay
what2261WPwhat
you2262PPyou
're2263VBPbe
missing2264VVGmiss
is2265VBZbe
the2266DTthe
next2267JJnext
step2268NNstep
.2269SENT.
You2270PPyou
have2271VHPhave
to2272TOto
be2273VBbe
able2274JJable
to2275TOto
show2276VVshow
that2277IN/thatthat
that2278DTthat
remediation2279NNremediation
will2280MDwill
be2281VBbe
approved2282VVNapprove
.2283SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2284LOC[MS. BLATT]
Yeah2285NPYeah
.2286SENT.
So2287RBso
...2288:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2289LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So2290RBso
,2291,,
if2292INif
...2293:...
if2294INif
that2295WDTthat
's2296VBZbe
their2297PP$their
burden2298NNburden
,2299,,
why2300WRBwhy
do2301VVPdo
we2302PPwe
need2303VVPneed
to2304TOto
go2305VVgo
any2306DTany
further2307RBRfurther
?2308SENT?
[MS. BLATT]2309LOC[MS. BLATT]
So2310INso
I2311PPI
...2312:...
two2313CDtwo
responses2314NNSresponse
.2315SENT.
So2316RBso
,2317,,
right2318RBright
now2319RBnow
,2320,,
they2321PPthey
do2322VVPdo
n't2323RBn't
have2324VHhave
federal2325JJfederal
permission2326NNpermission
.2327SENT.
And2328CCand
under2329INunder
Section2330NPSection
1222331CD@card@
,2332,,
you2333PPyou
have2334VHPhave
to2335TOto
take2336VVtake
federal2337JJfederal
...2338:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2339LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I2340PPI
did2341VVDdo
n't2342RBn't
say2343VVsay
...2344:...
[MS. BLATT]2345LOC[MS. BLATT]
We2346PPwe
're2347VBPbe
talking2348VVGtalk
about2349RBabout
...2350:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2351LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...2352:...
they2353PPthey
have2354VHPhave
to2355TOto
show2356VVshow
that2357IN/thatthat
they2358PPthey
will2359MDwill
get2360VVget
EPA2361NPEPA
approval2362NNapproval
.2363SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2364LOC[MS. BLATT]
And2365CCand
all2366RBall
I2367PPI
'm2368VBPbe
saying2369VVGsay
is2370VBZbe
you2371PPyou
know2372VVPknow
today2373NNtoday
.2374SENT.
Let2375VVlet
me2376PPme
just2377RBjust
make2378VVPmake
one2379CDone
other2380JJother
point2381NNpoint
as2382INas
a2383DTa
practical2384JJpractical
matter2385NNmatter
.2386SENT.
This2387DTthis
is2388VBZbe
not2389RBnot
a2390DTa
case2391NNcase
in2392INin
its2393PP$its
infancy2394NNinfancy
.2395SENT.
It2396PPit
was2397VBDbe
cooked2398VVNcook
.2399SENT.
It2400PPit
was2401VBDbe
about2402RBabout
to2403TOto
go2404VVgo
to2405TOto
trial2406NNtrial
.2407SENT.
It2408PPit
was2409VBDbe
three2410CDthree
weeks2411NNSweek
away2412RBaway
from2413INfrom
jury2414NNjury
selection2415NNselection
when2416WRBwhen
the2417DTthe
court2418NNcourt
got2419VVDget
stayed2420VVNstay
.2421SENT.
We2422PPwe
know2423VVPknow
they2424PPthey
're2425VBPbe
going2426VVGgo
to2427TOto
trial2428NNtrial
and2429CCand
the2430DTthe
whole2431JJwhole
case2432NNcase
is2433VBZbe
about2434RBabout
whether2435INwhether
a2436DTa
different2437JJdifferent
remedy2438NNremedy
should2439MDshould
be2440VBbe
put2441VVNput
on2442RPon
.2443SENT.
And2444CCand
we2445PPwe
know2446VVPknow
under2447INunder
state2448NNstate
law2449NNlaw
,2450,,
because2451INbecause
they2452PPthey
've2453VHPhave
conceded2454VVNconcede
it2455PPit
,2456,,
that2457IN/thatthat
they2458PPthey
have2459VHPhave
to2460TOto
carry2461VVcarry
out2462RPout
that2463DTthat
remedy2464NNremedy
.2465SENT.
And2466CCand
we2467PPwe
know2468VVPknow
they2469PPthey
do2470VVPdo
n't2471RBn't
have2472VHhave
EPA2473NPEPA
's2474POS's
permission2475NNpermission
.2476SENT.
So2477RBso
you2478PPyou
not2479RBnot
only2480RBonly
know2481VVknow
two2482CDtwo
things2483NNSthing
.2484SENT.
You2485PPyou
know2486VVPknow
,2487,,
again2488RBagain
,2489,,
it2490PPit
's2491VBZbe
conceded2492VVNconcede
that2493IN/thatthat
the2494DTthe
remedy2495NNremedy
seeks2496VVZseek
something2497NNsomething
different2498JJdifferent
,2499,,
and2500CCand
it2501PPit
would2502MDwould
require2503VVrequire
a2504DTa
change2505NNchange
in2506INin
federal2507JJfederal
law2508NNlaw
.2509SENT.
And2510CCand
you2511PPyou
know2512VVPknow
they2513PPthey
never2514RBnever
got2515VVDget
EPA2516NPEPA
's2517POS's
permission2518NNpermission
.2519SENT.
And2520CCand
I2521PPI
guess2522VVPguess
this2523DTthis
is2524VBZbe
assuming2525VVGassume
we2526PPwe
're2527VBPbe
not2528RBnot
even2529RBeven
getting2530VVGget
...2531:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]2532LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
The2533DTthe
answer2534NNanswer
...2535:...
the2536DTthe
answer2537NNanswer
,2538,,
I2539PPI
think2540VVPthink
,2541,,
is2542VBZbe
this2543DTthis
right2544NNright
,2545,,
to2546TOto
the2547DTthe
question2548NNquestion
,2549,,
which2550WDTwhich
is2551VBZbe
a2552DTa
question2553NNquestion
I2554PPI
had2555VHDhave
,2556,,
too2557RBtoo
,2558,,
is2559VBZbe
that2560IN/thatthat
in2561INin
order2562NNorder
to2563TOto
bring2564VVbring
an2565DTan
action2566NNaction
where2567WRBwhere
the2568DTthe
result2569NNresult
will2570MDwill
be2571VBbe
an2572DTan
order2573NNorder
to2574TOto
do2575VVdo
certain2576JJcertain
things2577NNSthing
,2578,,
dig2579NNdig
dirt2580NNdirt
or2581CCor
do2582VVdo
physical2583JJphysical
things2584NNSthing
,2585,,
if2586INif
they2587PPthey
are2588VBPbe
a2589DTa
potentially2590RBpotentially
responsible2591JJresponsible
party2592NNparty
,2593,,
they2594PPthey
have2595VHPhave
to2596TOto
show2597VVshow
not2598RBnot
that2599IN/thatthat
EPA2600NPEPA
might2601MDmight
approve2602VVapprove
it2603PPit
,2604,,
but2605CCbut
what2606WPwhat
it2607PPit
says2608VVZsay
is2609VBZbe
unless2610INunless
such2611JJsuch
remedial2612JJremedial
action2613NNaction
,2614,,
which2615WDTwhich
is2616VBZbe
the2617DTthe
reaction2618NNreaction
they2619PPthey
're2620VBPbe
seeking2621VVGseek
,2622,,
has2623VHZhave
been2624VBNbe
authorized2625VVNauthorize
by2626INby
EPA2627NPEPA
.2628SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2629LOC[MS. BLATT]
And2630CCand
you2631PPyou
know2632VVPknow
today2633NNtoday
that2634WDTthat
...2635:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]2636LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
It2637PPit
has2638VHZhave
not2639RBnot
.2640SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2641LOC[MS. BLATT]
...2642:...
not2643RBnot
only2644RBonly
has2645VHZhave
it2646PPit
not2647RBnot
been2648VBNbe
,2649,,
they2650PPthey
never2651RBnever
ask2652VVPask
EPA2653NPEPA
.2654SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2655LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And2656CCand
,2657,,
therefore2658RBtherefore
,2659,,
what2660WPwhat
we2661PPwe
should2662MDshould
do2663VVdo
if2664INif
you2665PPyou
are2666VBPbe
right2667RBright
on2668INon
the2669DTthe
potentially2670RBpotentially
responsible2671JJresponsible
party2672NNparty
is2673VBZbe
we2674PPwe
should2675MDshould
send2676VVsend
it2677PPit
back2678RBback
and2679CCand
say2680VVPsay
they2681PPthey
have2682VHPhave
to2683TOto
get2684VVget
that2685DTthat
permission2686NNpermission
from2687INfrom
EPA2688NPEPA
.2689SENT.
And2690CCand
there2691EXthere
is2692VBZbe
no2693DTno
need2694NNneed
to2695TOto
answer2696VVanswer
the2697DTthe
other2698JJother
questions2699NNSquestion
.2700SENT.
Is2701VBZbe
that2702IN/thatthat
right2703JJright
or2704CCor
wrong2705JJwrong
?2706SENT?
[MS. BLATT]2707LOC[MS. BLATT]
That2708DTthat
's2709VBZbe
wrong2710JJwrong
and2711CCand
I2712PPI
disagree2713VVPdisagree
.2714SENT.
You2715PPyou
already2716RBalready
know2717VVPknow
today2718NNtoday
they2719PPthey
do2720VVPdo
n't2721RBn't
have2722VHhave
it2723PPit
.2724SENT.
And2725CCand
just2726RBjust
as2727INas
the2728DTthe
case2729NNcase
sits2730VVZsit
today2731NNtoday
,2732,,
whether2733INwhether
they2734PPthey
could2735MDcould
have2736VHhave
brought2737VVNbring
some2738DTsome
separate2739JJseparate
federal2740JJfederal
lawsuit2741NNlawsuit
after2742INafter
they2743PPthey
asked2744VVDask
EPA2745NPEPA
...2746:...
excuse2747VVexcuse
me2748PPme
,2749,,
state2750NNstate
lawsuit2751NNlawsuit
,2752,,
but2753CCbut
you2754PPyou
already2755RBalready
know2756VVPknow
today2757NNtoday
that2758IN/thatthat
they2759PPthey
never2760RBnever
asked2761VVDask
for2762INfor
it2763PPit
.2764SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2765LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah2766NPYeah
.2767SENT.
That2768DTthat
's2769VBZbe
why2770WRBwhy
I2771PPI
say2772VVPsay
we2773PPwe
'd2774MDwould
send2775VVsend
it2776PPit
back2777RBback
,2778,,
they2779PPthey
do2780VVPdo
not2781RBnot
meet2782VVmeet
that2783DTthat
requirement2784NNrequirement
if2785INif
they2786PPthey
are2787VBPbe
potentially2788RBpotentially
responsible2789JJresponsible
parties2790NNSparty
,2791,,
so2792RBso
dismiss2793VVdismiss
the2794DTthe
case2795NNcase
.2796SENT.
Now2797RBnow
,2798,,
if2799INif
that2800DTthat
...2801:...
if2802INif
you2803PPyou
win2804VVPwin
in2805INin
that2806DTthat
respect2807NNrespect
,2808,,
I2809PPI
'm2810VBPbe
asking2811VVGask
if2812INif
there2813EXthere
is2814VBZbe
a2815DTa
need2816NNneed
to2817TOto
reach2818VVreach
the2819DTthe
other2820JJother
two2821CDtwo
questions2822NNSquestion
.2823SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2824LOC[MS. BLATT]
Okay2825NPOkay
.2826SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2827LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I2828PPI
suspect2829VVPsuspect
there2830EXthere
is2831VBZbe
n't2832RBn't
,2833,,
but2834CCbut
am2835VBPbe
I2836PPI
right2837JJright
?2838SENT?
[MS. BLATT]2839LOC[MS. BLATT]
Yes2840NPYes
.2841SENT.
If2842INif
you2843PPyou
rule2844VVPrule
for2845INfor
us2846PPus
under2847INunder
Section2848NPSection
1222849CD@card@
that2850IN/thatthat
they2851PPthey
can2852MDcan
't2853RB't
carry2854VVcarry
out2855RPout
their2856PP$their
restoration2857NNrestoration
remedy2858NNremedy
because2859INbecause
they2860PPthey
do2861VVPdo
n't2862RBn't
have2863VHhave
EPA2864NPEPA
's2865POS's
permission2866NNpermission
,2867,,
then2868RBthen
that2869DTthat
's2870VBZbe
sufficient2871JJsufficient
to2872TOto
resolve2873VVresolve
the2874DTthe
case2875NNcase
.2876SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2877LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Fine2878NPFine
.2879SENT.
Now2880RBnow
they2881PPthey
say2882VVPsay
they2883PPthey
are2884VBPbe
not2885RBnot
potentially2886RBpotentially
responsible2887JJresponsible
parties2888NNSparty
,2889,,
but2890CCbut
you2891PPyou
say2892VVPsay
they2893PPthey
are2894VBPbe
.2895SENT.
Why2896WRBwhy
?2897SENT?
[MS. BLATT]2898LOC[MS. BLATT]
Because2899INbecause
in2900INin
three2901CDthree
...2902:...
because2903INbecause
they2904PPthey
are2905VBPbe
landowners2906NNSlandowner
with2907INwith
...2908:...
with2909INwith
hazardous2910JJhazardous
waste2911NNwaste
on2912INon
a2913DTa
Superfund2914NPSuperfund
site2915NNsite
.2916SENT.
And2917CCand
three2918CDthree
provisions2919NNSprovision
textually2920RBtextually
equate2921VVPequate
all2922DTall
persons2923NNSperson
who2924WPwho
are2925VBPbe
owners2926NNSowner
and2927CCand
operators2928NNSoperator
under2929INunder
1072930CD@card@
because2931INbecause
they2932PPthey
own2933VVPown
land2934NNland
on2935INon
a2936DTa
Superfund2937NPSuperfund
site2938NNsite
.2939SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2940LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But2941CCbut
they2942PPthey
say2943VVPsay
they2944PPthey
are2945VBPbe
not2946RBnot
potentially2947RBpotentially
responsible2948JJresponsible
.2949SENT.
Perhaps2950RBperhaps
they2951PPthey
were2952VBDbe
potentially2953RBpotentially
responsible2954JJresponsible
,2955,,
but2956CCbut
they2957PPthey
are2958VBPbe
not2959RBnot
potentially2960RBpotentially
responsible2961JJresponsible
because2962INbecause
EPA2963NPEPA
and2964CCand
everybody2965NNeverybody
else2966RBelse
has2967VHZhave
told2968VVNtell
them2969PPthem
they2970PPthey
're2971VBPbe
not2972RBnot
responsible2973JJresponsible
.2974SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2975LOC[MS. BLATT]
So2976RBso
no2977RBno
,2978,,
and2979CCand
here2980RBhere
is2981VBZbe
why2982WRBwhy
:2983::
Potentially2984RBpotentially
responsible2985JJresponsible
parties2986NNSparty
has2987VHZhave
always2988RBalways
been2989VBNbe
understood2990VVNunderstand
by2991INby
this2992DTthis
Court2993NPCourt
and2994CCand
everyone2995NNeveryone
else2996RBelse
as2997INas
a2998DTa
status2999NNstatus
,3000,,
not3001RBnot
whether3002INwhether
you3003PPyou
could3004MDcould
be3005VBbe
liable3006JJliable
.3007SENT.
And3008CCand
their3009PP$their
rule3010NNrule
that3011WDTthat
says3012VVZsay
could3013MDcould
you3014PPyou
be3015VBbe
liable3016JJliable
at3017INat
any3018DTany
given3019VVNgive
point3020NNpoint
in3021INin
time3022NNtime
is3023VBZbe
not3024RBnot
only3025RBonly
unheard3026JJunheard
of3027INof
,3028,,
it3029PPit
's3030VBZbe
unworkable3031JJunworkable
,3032,,
because3033INbecause
you3034PPyou
would3035MDwould
never3036RBnever
know3037VVknow
whether3038INwhether
a3039DTa
court3040NNcourt
would3041MDwould
accept3042VVaccept
a3043DTa
defense3044NNdefense
,3045,,
including3046VVGinclude
...3047:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3048LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Whether3049INwhether
they3050PPthey
were3051VBDbe
or3052CCor
they3053PPthey
were3054VBDbe
n't3055RBn't
potentially3056RBpotentially
responsible3057JJresponsible
parties3058NNSparty
,3059,,
they3060PPthey
are3061VBPbe
landowners3062NNSlandowner
,3063,,
correct3064JJcorrect
?3065SENT?
And3066CCand
do3067VVPdo
I3068PPI
understand3069VVPunderstand
correctly3070RBcorrectly
,3071,,
whether3072INwhether
they3073PPthey
're3074VBPbe
PRPs3075NNSPRPs
or3076CCor
not3077RBnot
,3078,,
if3079INif
they3080PPthey
're3081VBPbe
landowners3082NNSlandowner
,3083,,
they3084PPthey
can3085MDcan
't3086RB't
take3087VVtake
any3088DTany
...3089:...
they3090PPthey
can3091MDcan
't3092RB't
make3093VVmake
any3094DTany
change3095NNchange
without3096INwithout
EPA3097NPEPA
approval3098NNapproval
?3099SENT?
[MS. BLATT]3100LOC[MS. BLATT]
They3101PPthey
can3102MDcan
't3103RB't
take3104VVtake
a3105DTa
statutorily3106RBstatutorily
defined3107VVNdefine
term3108NNterm
called3109VVDcall
remedial3110JJremedial
action3111NNaction
that3112WDTthat
's3113VBZbe
defined3114VVNdefine
in3115INin
1013116CD@card@
/3117SYM/
243118CD@card@
,3119,,
and3120CCand
it3121PPit
defines3122VVZdefine
what3123WPwhat
a3124DTa
remedial3125JJremedial
action3126NNaction
is3127VBZbe
.3128SENT.
So3129RBso
they3130PPthey
can3131MDcan
do3132VVdo
ordinary3133JJordinary
things3134NNSthing
to3135TOto
their3136PP$their
property3137NNproperty
.3138SENT.
They3139PPthey
can3140MDcan
't3141RB't
do3142VVPdo
the3143DTthe
major3144JJmajor
upheaval3145NNupheaval
of3146INof
500,0003147CD@card@
tons3148NNSton
and3149CCand
...3150:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3151LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Whether3152INwhether
the3153DTthe
PRP3154NPPRP
is3155VBZbe
responsible3156JJresponsible
to3157TOto
someone3158NNsomeone
else3159RBelse
or3160CCor
to3161TOto
the3162DTthe
EPA3163NPEPA
,3164,,
whether3165INwhether
they3166PPthey
're3167VBPbe
continuous3168JJcontinuous
landowners3169NNSlandowner
or3170CCor
something3171NNsomething
else3172NNelse
that3173WDTthat
exempts3174VVZexempt
them3175PPthem
,3176,,
that3177WDTthat
...3178:...
that3179WDTthat
's3180VBZbe
my3181PP$my
bottom3182JJbottom
line3183NNline
,3184,,
which3185WDTwhich
is3186VBZbe
the3187DTthe
mere3188JJmere
fact3189NNfact
that3190IN/thatthat
they3191PPthey
want3192VVPwant
to3193TOto
take3194VVtake
some3195DTsome
action3196NNaction
on3197INon
their3198PP$their
land3199NNland
that3200WDTthat
's3201VBZbe
remedial3202JJremedial
,3203,,
they3204PPthey
would3205MDwould
have3206VHhave
to3207TOto
get3208VVget
EPA3209NPEPA
approval3210NNapproval
?3211SENT?
[MS. BLATT]3212LOC[MS. BLATT]
Absolutely3213RBabsolutely
.3214SENT.
And3215CCand
PRP3216NPPRP
status3217NNstatus
,3218,,
it3219PPit
does3220VVZdo
n't3221RBn't
...3222:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3223LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Can3224MDcan
you3225PPyou
point3226VVpoint
me3227PPme
to3228TOto
the3229DTthe
provision3230NNprovision
that3231WDTthat
says3232VVZsay
that3233IN/thatthat
,3234,,
that3235WDTthat
says3236VVZsay
whether3237INwhether
they3238PPthey
're3239VBPbe
PRPs3240NNSPRPs
or3241CCor
not3242RBnot
,3243,,
as3244RBas
long3245RBlong
as3246INas
they3247PPthey
're3248VBPbe
landowners3249NNSlandowner
,3250,,
if3251INif
they3252PPthey
're3253VBPbe
going3254VVGgo
to3255TOto
take3256VVtake
any3257DTany
remedial3258JJremedial
action3259NNaction
on3260INon
their3261PP$their
property3262NNproperty
?3263SENT?
[MS. BLATT]3264LOC[MS. BLATT]
So3265INso
1223266CD@card@
(3267((
e3268LSe
)3269))
(3270((
63271CD6
)3272))
is3273VBZbe
the3274DTthe
one3275CDone
that3276WDTthat
says3277VVZsay
PRPs3278NNSPRPs
have3279VHPhave
to3280TOto
have3281VHhave
EPA3282NPEPA
's3283POS's
permission3284NNpermission
for3285INfor
any3286DTany
remedial3287JJremedial
action3288NNaction
.3289SENT.
And3290CCand
then3291RBthen
the3292DTthe
1073293CD@card@
,3294,,
1223295CD@card@
(3296((
a3297DTa
)3298))
,3299,,
63300CD6
1223301CD@card@
(3302((
e3303LSe
)3304))
(3305((
13306LS1
)3307))
and3308CCand
1053309CD@card@
(3310((
h3311NNh
)3312))
(3313((
43314LS4
)3315))
...3316:...
(3317((
h3318NNh
)3319))
...3320:...
excuse3321VVexcuse
me3322PPme
,3323,,
(3324((
h3325NNh
)3326))
(3327((
43328LS4
)3329))
(3330((
A3331NPA
)3332))
is3333VBZbe
the3334DTthe
one3335CDone
that3336WDTthat
defines3337VVZdefine
or3338CCor
equates3339VVZequate
owners3340NNSowner
and3341CCand
operators3342NNSoperator
under3343INunder
1073344CD@card@
with3345INwith
PRP3346NPPRP
status3347NNstatus
.3348SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3349LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank3350VVthank
you3351PPyou
,3352,,
counsel3353NNcounsel
.3354SENT.
Mr3355NPMr
.3356SENT.
Michel3357NPMichel
.3358SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]3359LOC[MR. MICHEL]
Thank3360VVthank
you3361PPyou
,3362,,
Mr3363NPMr
.3364SENT.
Chief3365NPChief
Justice3366NPJustice
,3367,,
and3368CCand
may3369MDmay
it3370PPit
please3371VVplease
the3372DTthe
Court3373NPCourt
:3374::
The3375DTthe
United3376NPUnited
States3377NPSStates
is3378VBZbe
here3379RBhere
because3380INbecause
the3381DTthe
narrow3382JJnarrow
aspect3383NNaspect
of3384INof
Respondents3385NNSrespondent
'3386POS'
suit3387NNsuit
that3388WDTthat
is3389VBZbe
before3390INbefore
this3391DTthis
Court3392NPCourt
,3393,,
namely3394RBnamely
the3395DTthe
request3396NNrequest
for3397INfor
a3398DTa
distinctive3399JJdistinctive
state3400NNstate
law3401NNlaw
remedy3402NNremedy
under3403INunder
which3404WDTwhich
a3405DTa
jury3406NNjury
may3407MDmay
authorize3408VVauthorize
a3409DTa
plan3410NNplan
to3411TOto
clean3412VVclean
up3413RPup
toxic3414JJtoxic
contamination3415NNcontamination
at3416INat
a3417DTa
Superfund3418NPSuperfund
site3419NNsite
in3420INin
a3421DTa
way3422NNway
that3423IN/thatthat
conflicts3424NNSconflict
with3425INwith
and3426CCand
in3427INin
many3428JJmany
respects3429NNSrespect
physically3430RBphysically
destroys3431VVZdestroy
the3432DTthe
EPA3433NPEPA
plan3434NNplan
selected3435VVNselect
under3436INunder
CERCLA3437NPCERCLA
,3438,,
squarely3439RBsquarely
conflicts3440NNSconflict
with3441INwith
CERCLA3442NPCERCLA
and3443CCand
would3444MDwould
jeopardize3445VVjeopardize
EPA3446NPEPA
's3447POS's
cleanups3448NNScleanup
at3449INat
this3450DTthis
Superfund3451NPSuperfund
site3452NNsite
and3453CCand
other3454JJother
Superfund3455NPSuperfund
sites3456NNSsite
across3457INacross
the3458DTthe
nation3459NNnation
.3460SENT.
Now3461RBnow
,3462,,
to3463TOto
go3464VVgo
to3465TOto
some3466DTsome
of3467INof
the3468DTthe
questions3469NNSquestion
that3470WDTthat
have3471VHPhave
...3472:...
have3473VHPhave
been3474VBNbe
raised3475VVNraise
already3476RBalready
,3477,,
this3478DTthis
is3479VBZbe
a3480DTa
narrow3481JJnarrow
...3482:...
our3483PP$our
argument3484NNargument
here3485RBhere
is3486VBZbe
narrow3487JJnarrow
.3488SENT.
The3489DTthe
...3490:...
the3491DTthe
statute3492NNstatute
does3493VVZdo
have3494VHhave
savings3495NNSsaving
clauses3496NNSclause
,3497,,
and3498CCand
we3499PPwe
do3500VVPdo
n't3501RBn't
dispute3502VVdispute
that3503IN/thatthat
Respondents3504NNSrespondent
can3505MDcan
move3506VVmove
forward3507RBforward
with3508INwith
their3509PP$their
claims3510NNSclaim
for3511INfor
money3512NNmoney
damages3513NNSdamage
under3514INunder
state3515NNstate
law3516NNlaw
and3517CCand
nuisance3518NNnuisance
and3519CCand
tort3520NNtort
and3521CCand
other3522JJother
related3523JJrelated
theories3524NNStheory
that3525WDTthat
do3526VVPdo
n't3527RBn't
call3528VVcall
into3529INinto
question3530NNquestion
the3531DTthe
EPA3532NPEPA
remedy3533NNremedy
.3534SENT.
And3535CCand
,3536,,
likewise3537RBlikewise
,3538,,
as3539INas
Justice3540NPJustice
Kagan3541NPKagan
pointed3542VVDpoint
out3543RPout
,3544,,
there3545EXthere
are3546VBPbe
a3547DTa
number3548NNnumber
of3549INof
mechanisms3550NNSmechanism
in3551INin
the3552DTthe
statute3553NNstatute
for3554INfor
states3555NNSstate
to3556TOto
adopt3557VVadopt
what3558WPwhat
are3559VBPbe
called3560VVNcall
ARARs3561NPARARs
,3562,,
Applicable3563JJapplicable
and3564CCand
/3565SYM/
or3566CCor
Relevant3567JJrelevant
and3568CCand
Appropriate3569JJappropriate
Standards3570NPSStandards
,3571,,
that3572WDTthat
could3573MDcould
be3574VBbe
implemented3575VVNimplement
as3576INas
part3577NNpart
of3578INof
...3579:...
of3580INof
the3581DTthe
EPA3582NPEPA
cleanup3583NNcleanup
plan3584NNplan
.3585SENT.
And3586CCand
I3587PPI
think3588VVPthink
that3589WDTthat
goes3590VVZgo
to3591TOto
a3592DTa
broader3593JJRbroad
point3594NNpoint
,3595,,
which3596WDTwhich
is3597VBZbe
that3598IN/thatthat
CERCLA3599NPCERCLA
really3600RBreally
lays3601VVZlay
out3602RPout
a3603DTa
two-step3604JJtwo-step
process3605NNprocess
.3606SENT.
At3607INat
the3608DTthe
first3609JJfirst
step3610NNstep
,3611,,
EPA3612NPEPA
,3613,,
or3614CCor
whatever3615WDTwhatever
federal3616JJfederal
agency3617NNagency
is3618VBZbe
conducting3619VVGconduct
the3620DTthe
plan3621NNplan
,3622,,
goes3623VVZgo
through3624INthrough
a3625DTa
very3626RBvery
reticulated3627VVNreticulate
process3628NNprocess
of3629INof
getting3630VVGget
public3631JJpublic
comment3632NNcomment
,3633,,
meeting3634VVGmeet
with3635INwith
...3636:...
meeting3637VVGmeet
with3638INwith
landowners3639NNSlandowner
,3640,,
meeting3641NNmeeting
with3642INwith
the3643DTthe
state3644NNstate
,3645,,
and3646CCand
selects3647VVZselect
a3648DTa
cleanup3649NNcleanup
plan3650NNplan
in3651INin
...3652:...
in3653INin
compliance3654NNcompliance
with3655INwith
those3656DTthose
procedural3657JJprocedural
and3658CCand
the3659DTthe
substantive3660JJsubstantive
requirement3661NNrequirement
that3662IN/thatthat
they3663PPthey
protect3664VVprotect
human3665JJhuman
health3666NNhealth
.3667SENT.
Then3668RBthen
,3669,,
at3670INat
the3671DTthe
second3672JJsecond
stage3673NNstage
,3674,,
CERCLA3675NPCERCLA
says3676VVZsay
go3677VVgo
and3678CCand
carry3679VVcarry
out3680RPout
the3681DTthe
cleanup3682NNcleanup
plan3683NNplan
and3684CCand
CERCLA3685NPCERCLA
erects3686VVZerect
a3687DTa
number3688NNnumber
of3689INof
protections3690NNSprotection
...3691:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3692LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Sorry3693JJsorry
,3694,,
are3695VBPbe
you3696PPyou
agreeing3697VVGagree
with3698INwith
Ms3699NNMs
.3700SENT.
Blatt3701NPBlatt
that3702IN/thatthat
your3703PP$your
plan3704NNplan
is3705VBZbe
both3706CCboth
the3707DTthe
floor3708NNfloor
and3709CCand
the3710DTthe
ceiling3711NNceiling
?3712SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]3713LOC[MR. MICHEL]
So3714INso
I3715PPI
think3716VVPthink
it3717PPit
...3718:...
not3719RBnot
necessarily3720RBnecessarily
in3721INin
every3722DTevery
respect3723NNrespect
,3724,,
but3725CCbut
I3726PPI
think3727VVPthink
in3728INin
the3729DTthe
respect3730NNrespect
that3731WDTthat
matters3732VVZmatter
in3733INin
this3734DTthis
case3735NNcase
,3736,,
it3737PPit
is3738VBZbe
.3739SENT.
And3740CCand
123741CD@card@
I3742PPI
...3743:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3744LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
No3745UHNo
,3746,,
no3747UHno
,3748,,
no3749UHno
,3750,,
let3751VVlet
me3752PPme
...3753:...
let3754VVlet
me3755PPme
go3756VVgo
back3757RBback
.3758SENT.
Is3759VBZbe
it3760PPit
always3761RBalways
the3762DTthe
ceiling3763NNceiling
?3764SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]3765LOC[MR. MICHEL]
I3766PPI
mean3767VVPmean
,3768,,
an3769DTan
EPA3770NPEPA
...3771:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3772LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
An3773DTan
owner3774NNowner
can3775MDcan
come3776VVcome
to3777TOto
you3778PPyou
and3779CCand
say3780VVPsay
I3781PPI
want3782VVPwant
to3783TOto
do3784VVdo
more3785JJRmore
,3786,,
and3787CCand
you3788PPyou
can3789MDcan
decide3790VVdecide
yes3791RByes
or3792CCor
no3793RBno
,3794,,
right3795RBright
?3796SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]3797LOC[MR. MICHEL]
Yes3798NPYes
,3799,,
absolutely3800RBabsolutely
.3801SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3802LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So3803INso
it3804PPit
's3805VBZbe
not3806RBnot
always3807RBalways
the3808DTthe
ceiling3809NNceiling
.3810SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]3811LOC[MR. MICHEL]
I3812PPI
mean3813VVPmean
...3814:...
yes3815UHyes
.3816SENT.
And3817CCand
,3818,,
in3819INin
fact3820NNfact
,3821,,
the3822DTthe
statute3823NNstatute
...3824:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3825LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
All3826DTall
right3827NNright
.3828SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]3829LOC[MR. MICHEL]
...3830:...
as3831INas
we3832PPwe
discussed3833VVDdiscuss
,3834,,
as3835RBas
...3836:...
as3837INas
Ms3838NNMs
.3839SENT.
Blatt3840NPBlatt
discussed3841VVDdiscuss
at3842INat
length3843NNlength
...3844:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3845LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So3846CCso
are3847VBPbe
you3848PPyou
reading3849VVGread
their3850PP$their
state3851NNstate
...3852:...
are3853VBPbe
you3854PPyou
reading3855VVGread
this3856DTthis
remedy3857NNremedy
as3858INas
requiring3859VVGrequire
the3860DTthe
remediation3861NNremediation
that3862WDTthat
's3863VHZhave
awarded3864VVNaward
no3865DTno
matter3866NNmatter
what3867WPwhat
?3868SENT?
With3869INwith
or3870CCor
without3871INwithout
EPA3872NPEPA
approval3873NNapproval
?3874SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]3875LOC[MR. MICHEL]
I3876PPI
...3877:...
I3878PPI
think3879VVPthink
the3880DTthe
Montana3881NPMontana
Supreme3882NPSupreme
Court3883NPCourt
decision3884NNdecision
implies3885VVZimply
that3886IN/thatthat
Respondents3887NNSrespondent
could3888MDcould
move3889VVmove
forward3890RBforward
with3891INwith
their3892PP$their
claim3893NNclaim
as3894INas
it3895PPit
now3896RBnow
exists3897VVZexist
even3898RBeven
if3899INif
they3900PPthey
did3901VVDdo
n't3902RBn't
have3903VHhave
EPA3904NPEPA
approval3905NNapproval
.3906SENT.
And3907CCand
we3908PPwe
think3909VVPthink
that3910WDTthat
is3911VBZbe
...3912:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3913LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
How3914WRBHow
about3915RBabout
if3916INif
they3917PPthey
did3918VVDdo
,3919,,
if3920INif
they3921PPthey
could3922MDcould
get3923VVget
your3924PP$your
approval3925NNapproval
,3926,,
if3927INif
they3928PPthey
could3929MDcould
show3930VVshow
that3931IN/thatthat
they3932PPthey
could3933MDcould
get3934VVget
your3935PP$your
approval3936NNapproval
?3937SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]3938LOC[MR. MICHEL]
I3939PPI
mean3940VVPmean
,3941,,
if3942INif
they3943PPthey
could3944MDcould
get3945VVget
our3946PP$our
approval3947NNapproval
under3948INunder
1223949CD@card@
(3950((
e3951LSe
)3952))
(3953((
63954CD6
)3955))
,3956,,
then3957RBthen
we3958PPwe
would3959MDwould
n't3960RBn't
have3961VHhave
a3962DTa
problem3963NNproblem
with3964INwith
...3965:...
with3966INwith
the3967DTthe
suit3968NNsuit
,3969,,
but3970CCbut
I3971PPI
think3972VVPthink
that3973DTthat
...3974:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3975LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
All3976DTall
right3977NNright
.3978SENT.
How3979WRBHow
about3980RBabout
if3981INif
they3982PPthey
're3983VBPbe
not3984RBnot
a3985DTa
PRP3986NPPRP
?3987SENT?
Let3988VVlet
's3989VBZbe
assume3990VVassume
they3991PPthey
're3992VBPbe
a3993DTa
contiguous3994JJcontiguous
...3995:...
there3996EXthere
's3997VBZbe
a3998DTa
whole3999JJwhole
set4000NNset
of4001INof
arguments4002NNSargument
in4003INin
these4004DTthese
briefs4005NNSbrief
by4006INby
some4007DTsome
of4008INof
them4009PPthem
,4010,,
putting4011VVGput
aside4012RBaside
whether4013INwhether
they4014PPthey
're4015VBPbe
a4016DTa
PRP4017NPPRP
because4018INbecause
of4019INof
...4020:...
of4021INof
the4022DTthe
statute4023NNstatute
of4024INof
limitations4025NNSlimitation
,4026,,
which4027WDTwhich
,4028,,
you4029PPyou
know4030VVPknow
,4031,,
is4032VBZbe
not4033RBnot
very4034RBvery
compelling4035JJcompelling
to4036TOto
me4037PPme
,4038,,
okay4039JJokay
?4040SENT?
But4041CCbut
putting4042VVGput
that4043IN/thatthat
aside4044RBaside
,4045,,
let4046VVlet
's4047VBZbe
assume4048VVassume
that4049IN/thatthat
by4050INby
definition4051NNdefinition
they4052PPthey
are4053VBPbe
a4054DTa
PRP4055NPPRP
.4056SENT.
Or4057CCor
they4058PPthey
're4059VBPbe
not4060RBnot
a4061DTa
PRP4062NPPRP
;4063:;
they4064PPthey
're4065VBPbe
a4066DTa
continuous4067JJcontinuous
landowner4068NNlandowner
.4069SENT.
They4070PPthey
are4071VBPbe
not4072RBnot
a4073DTa
PRP4074NPPRP
.4075SENT.
What4076WPWhat
about4077INabout
those4078DTthose
people4079NNSpeople
?4080SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]4081LOC[MR. MICHEL]
So4082INso
I4083PPI
think4084VVPthink
an4085DTan
important4086JJimportant
distinction4087NNdistinction
is4088VBZbe
that4089IN/thatthat
if4090INif
they4091PPthey
were4092VBDbe
found4093VVNfind
to4094TOto
be4095VBbe
a4096DTa
contiguous4097JJcontiguous
landowner4098NNlandowner
,4099,,
that4100WDTthat
would4101MDwould
not4102RBnot
take4103VVtake
them4104PPthem
out4105RPout
of4106INof
the4107DTthe
status4108NNstatus
of4109INof
being4110VBGbe
a4111DTa
PRP4112NPPRP
.4113SENT.
That4114DTthat
would4115MDwould
imply4116VVimply
that4117IN/thatthat
they4118PPthey
're4119VBPbe
not4120RBnot
liable4121JJliable
,4122,,
as4123RBas
...4124:...
as4125INas
you4126PPyou
pointed4127VVDpoint
out4128RPout
...4129:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]4130LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
All4131DTall
right4132NNright
.4133SENT.
So4134RBso
what4135WPwhat
you4136PPyou
're4137VBPbe
saying4138VVGsay
is4139VBZbe
if4140INif
you4141PPyou
're4142VBPbe
a4143DTa
landowner4144NNlandowner
,4145,,
you4146PPyou
might4147MDmight
not4148RBnot
be4149VBbe
liable4150JJliable
because4151INbecause
some4152DTsome
justices4153NNSjustice
might4154MDmight
have4155VHhave
a4156DTa
problem4157NNproblem
with4158INwith
the4159DTthe
concept4160NNconcept
that4161IN/thatthat
someone4162NNsomeone
who4163WPwho
did4164VVDdo
n't4165RBn't
pollute4166VVpollute
and4167CCand
does4168VVZdo
n't4169RBn't
encourage4170VVencourage
the4171DTthe
polluting4172VVGpollute
would4173MDwould
be4174VBbe
financially4175RBfinancially
liable4176JJliable
.4177SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]4178LOC[MR. MICHEL]
And4179CCand
that4180DTthat
's4181VBZbe
an4182DTan
instinct4183NNinstinct
that4184IN/thatthat
EPA4185NPEPA
shares4186NNSshare
as4187INas
we4188PPwe
quote4189VVPquote
in4190INin
our4191PP$our
brief4192NNbrief
.4193SENT.
EPA4194NPEPA
has4195VHZhave
had4196VHNhave
a4197DTa
policy4198NNpolicy
since4199INsince
19914200CD@card@
of4201INof
not4202RBnot
imposing4203VVGimpose
liability4204NNliability
on4205INon
residential4206JJresidential
landowners4207NNSlandowner
on4208INon
Superfund4209NPSuperfund
sites4210NNSsite
.4211SENT.
But4212CCbut
...4213:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4214LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So4215RBso
,4216,,
Mr4217NPMr
.4218SENT.
Michel4219NPMichel
,4220,,
if4221INif
I4222PPI
could4223MDcould
ask4224VVask
about4225INabout
the4226DTthe
PRP4227NPPRP
status4228NNstatus
,4229,,
because4230INbecause
there4231EXthere
are4232VBPbe
obvious4233JJobvious
consequences4234NNSconsequence
of4235INof
labeling4236VVGlabel
somebody4237NNsomebody
a4238DTa
PRP4239NPPRP
in4240INin
the4241DTthe
way4242NNway
that4243IN/thatthat
you4244PPyou
suggest4245VVPsuggest
,4246,,
that4247IN/thatthat
these4248DTthese
sites4249NNSsite
...4250:...
and4251CCand
they4252PPthey
can4253MDcan
be4254VBbe
sites4255NNSsite
for4256INfor
decades4257NNSdecade
and4258CCand
decade4259NNdecade
and4260CCand
...4261:...
and4262CCand
deprive4263VVdeprive
people4264NNSpeople
of4265INof
doing4266VVGdo
some4267DTsome
significant4268JJsignificant
things4269NNSthing
that4270IN/thatthat
they4271PPthey
want4272VVPwant
to4273TOto
do4274VVdo
to4275TOto
their4276PP$their
land4277NNland
.4278SENT.
And4279CCand
the4280DTthe
question4281NNquestion
,4282,,
I4283PPI
guess4284VVPguess
,4285,,
is4286VBZbe
why4287WRBwhy
do4288VVPdo
you4289PPyou
...4290:...
why4291WRBwhy
do4292VVPdo
we4293PPwe
think4294VVPthink
the4295DTthe
statute4296NNstatute
requires4297VVZrequire
those4298DTthose
consequences4299NNSconsequence
as4300RBas
to4301TOto
a4302DTa
person4303NNperson
whom4304WPwhom
has4305VHZhave
...4306:...
who4307WPwho
has4308VHZhave
never4309RBnever
been4310VBNbe
treated4311VVNtreat
as4312INas
a4313DTa
PRP4314NPPRP
by4315INby
the4316DTthe
government4317NNgovernment
,4318,,
who4319WPwho
has4320VHZhave
never4321RBnever
been4322VBNbe
involved4323VVNinvolve
in4324INin
settlement4325NNsettlement
negotiations4326NNSnegotiation
,4327,,
who4328WPwho
,4329,,
under4330INunder
reigning4331VVGreign
law4332NNlaw
,4333,,
including4334VVGinclude
the4335DTthe
statute4336NNstatute
of4337INof
limitations4338NNSlimitation
,4339,,
has4340VHZhave
no4341DTno
liability4342NNliability
exposure4343NNexposure
?4344SENT?
I4345PPI
mean4346VVPmean
,4347,,
it4348PPit
would4349MDwould
seem4350VVseem
a4351DTa
big4352JJbig
deal4353NNdeal
to4354TOto
take4355VVtake
a4356DTa
person4357NNperson
like4358INlike
that4359DTthat
and4360CCand
say4361VVPsay
you4362PPyou
've4363VHPhave
lost4364VVNlose
some4365DTsome
significant4366JJsignificant
property4367NNproperty
rights4368NNSright
.4369SENT.
Why4370WRBwhy
?4371SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]4372LOC[MR. MICHEL]
So4373INso
I4374PPI
think4375VVPthink
two4376CDtwo
responses4377NNSresponse
.4378SENT.
First4379RBfirst
,4380,,
I4381PPI
do4382VVPdo
want4383VVwant
to4384TOto
make4385VVmake
clear4386JJclear
that4387IN/thatthat
1224388CD@card@
(4389((
e4390LSe
)4391))
(4392((
64393CD6
)4394))
,4395,,
the4396DTthe
PRP4397NPPRP
provision4398NNprovision
that4399IN/thatthat
we4400PPwe
're4401VBPbe
talking4402VVGtalk
about4403RBabout
here4404RBhere
,4405,,
only4406RBonly
applies4407VVZapply
to4408TOto
remedial4409JJremedial
action4410NNaction
.4411SENT.
And4412CCand
that4413WDTthat
has4414VHZhave
a4415DTa
defined4416VVNdefine
statutory4417JJstatutory
definition4418NNdefinition
.4419SENT.
It4420PPit
's4421VBZbe
in4422INin
204423CD@card@
96014424CD@card@
(4425((
a4426DTa
)4427))
(4428((
44429LS4
)4430))
.4431SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4432LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But4433CCbut
I4434PPI
said4435VVDsay
some4436DTsome
significant4437JJsignificant
things4438NNSthing
.4439SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]4440LOC[MR. MICHEL]
So4441RBso
...4442:...
so4443RBso
...4444:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4445LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So4446RBso
,4447,,
you4448PPyou
know4449VVPknow
,4450,,
look4451VVPlook
,4452,,
that4453IN/thatthat
you4454PPyou
can4455MDcan
still4456RBstill
,4457,,
you4458PPyou
know4459VVPknow
,4460,,
make4461VVPmake
a4462DTa
garden4463NNgarden
.4464SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]4465LOC[MR. MICHEL]
Absolutely4466RBabsolutely
,4467,,
you4468PPyou
can4469MDcan
still4470RBstill
make4471VVmake
a4472DTa
garden4473NNgarden
.4474SENT.
Now4475RBnow
,4476,,
as4477RBas
to4478TOto
significant4479JJsignificant
things4480NNSthing
,4481,,
I4482PPI
think4483VVPthink
it4484PPit
does4485VVZdo
make4486VVmake
perfect4487JJperfect
sense4488NNsense
that4489IN/thatthat
you4490PPyou
would4491MDwould
n't4492RBn't
want4493VVwant
somebody4494NNsomebody
who4495WPwho
lives4496VVZlive
on4497INon
a4498DTa
Superfund4499NPSuperfund
site4500NNsite
doing4501VVGdo
things4502NNSthing
in4503INin
the4504DTthe
earth4505NNearth
that4506WDTthat
will4507MDwill
interfere4508VVinterfere
with4509INwith
the4510DTthe
EPA4511NPEPA
remedy4512NNremedy
.4513SENT.
Of4514INof
course4515NNcourse
,4516,,
you4517PPyou
know4518VVPknow
,4519,,
there4520EXthere
's4521VBZbe
...4522:...
there4523EXthere
is4524VBZbe
,4525,,
on4526INon
a4527DTa
Superfund4528NPSuperfund
site4529NNsite
,4530,,
a4531DTa
sort4532NNsort
of4533INof
butterfly4534NNbutterfly
flaps4535VVZflap
its4536PP$its
wings4537NNSwing
problem4538NNproblem
where4539WRBwhere
,4540,,
if4541INif
you4542PPyou
dig4543VVPdig
up4544RPup
two4545CDtwo
feet4546NNSfoot
of4547INof
soil4548NNsoil
on4549INon
your4550PP$your
land4551NNland
,4552,,
you4553PPyou
can4554MDcan
kick4555VVkick
up4556RPup
arsenic4557NNarsenic
into4558INinto
the4559DTthe
air4560NNair
,4561,,
or4562CCor
if4563INif
you4564PPyou
dig4565VVPdig
a4566DTa
trench4567NNtrench
on4568INon
your4569PP$your
land4570NNland
...4571:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4572LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So4573INso
I4574PPI
guess4575VVPguess
I4576PPI
...4577:...
I4578PPI
...4579:...
I4580PPI
completely4581RBcompletely
take4582VVPtake
the4583DTthe
point4584NNpoint
that4585IN/thatthat
that4586WDTthat
might4587MDmight
have4588VHhave
been4589VBNbe
a4590DTa
sensible4591JJsensible
policy4592NNpolicy
decision4593NNdecision
for4594INfor
Congress4595NPCongress
to4596TOto
make4597VVmake
,4598,,
but4599CCbut
,4600,,
as4601INas
I4602PPI
look4603VVPlook
at4604INat
these4605DTthese
provisions4606NNSprovision
,4607,,
the4608DTthe
only4609JJonly
...4610:...
the4611DTthe
...4612:...
the4613DTthe
...4614:...
where4615WRBwhere
this4616DTthis
PRP4617NPPRP
comes4618VVZcome
from4619INfrom
is4620VBZbe
...4621:...
is4622VBZbe
...4623:...
is4624VBZbe
in4625INin
a4626DTa
section4627NNsection
that4628IN/thatthat
deals4629NNSdeal
with4630INwith
settlement4631NNsettlement
negotiations4632NNSnegotiation
.4633SENT.
And4634CCand
these4635DTthese
people4636NNSpeople
were4637VBDbe
not4638RBnot
ever4639RBever
involved4640VVNinvolve
in4641INin
settlement4642NNsettlement
negotiations4643NNSnegotiation
.4644SENT.
Nobody4645NNnobody
for4646INfor
a4647DTa
moment4648NNmoment
considered4649VVDconsider
that4650IN/thatthat
they4651PPthey
should4652MDshould
be4653VBbe
involved4654VVNinvolve
in4655INin
settlement4656NNsettlement
negotiations4657NNSnegotiation
.4658SENT.
So4659RBso
to4660TOto
apply4661VVapply
that4662DTthat
section4663NNsection
to4664TOto
these4665DTthese
people4666NNSpeople
seems4667VVZseem
,4668,,
you4669PPyou
know4670VVPknow
,4671,,
a4672DTa
stretch4673NNstretch
.4674SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]4675LOC[MR. MICHEL]
So4676INso
I4677PPI
...4678:...
I4679PPI
do4680VVPdo
n't4681RBn't
think4682VVthink
so4683RBso
,4684,,
Justice4685NPJustice
Kagan4686NPKagan
.4687SENT.
I4688PPI
...4689:...
PRP4690NPPRP
is4691VBZbe
used4692VVNuse
in4693INin
the4694DTthe
statute4695NNstatute
a4696DTa
lot4697NNlot
of4698INof
different4699JJdifferent
times4700NNStime
,4701,,
not4702RBnot
just4703RBjust
in4704INin
the4705DTthe
settlement4706NNsettlement
.4707SENT.
You4708PPyou
're4709VBPbe
right4710JJright
that4711IN/thatthat
(4712((
e4713LSe
)4714))
(4715((
64716CD6
)4717))
is4718VBZbe
under4719INunder
the4720DTthe
settlement4721NNsettlement
provision4722NNprovision
,4723,,
but4724CCbut
if4725INif
you4726PPyou
look4727VVPlook
at4728INat
(4729((
e4730LSe
)4731))
(4732((
14733LS1
)4734))
,4735,,
it4736PPit
's4737VBZbe
...4738:...
it4739PPit
...4740:...
it4741PPit
equates4742VVZequate
owners4743NNSowner
on4744INon
the4745DTthe
site4746NNsite
with4747INwith
PRPs4748NPPRPs
.4749SENT.
And4750CCand
so4751INso
the4752DTthe
Court4753NPCourt
could4754MDcould
leave4755VVleave
for4756INfor
another4757DTanother
day4758NNday
whether4759INwhether
PRP4760NPPRP
is4761VBZbe
coterminous4762JJcoterminous
with4763INwith
covered4764JJcovered
persons4765NNSperson
under4766INunder
Section4767NPSection
1074768CD@card@
and4769CCand
simply4770RBsimply
decide4771VVdecide
that4772IN/thatthat
owners4773NNSowner
on4774INon
Superfund4775NPSuperfund
sites4776NNSsite
are4777VBPbe
PRPs4778NPPRPs
.4779SENT.
And4780CCand
,4781,,
again4782RBagain
,4783,,
we4784PPwe
think4785VVPthink
that4786WDTthat
makes4787VVZmake
perfect4788JJperfect
sense4789NNsense
because4790INbecause
,4791,,
by4792INby
definition4793NNdefinition
,4794,,
when4795WRBwhen
you4796PPyou
have4797VHPhave
a4798DTa
cleanup4799NNcleanup
plan4800NNplan
that4801WDTthat
takes4802VVZtake
into4803INinto
account4804NNaccount
an4805DTan
entire4806JJentire
Superfund4807NPSuperfund
site4808NNsite
,4809,,
as4810INas
this4811DTthis
one4812CDone
does4813VVZdo
,4814,,
and4815CCand
one4816CDone
landowner4817NNlandowner
does4818VVZdo
something4819NNsomething
that4820WDTthat
affects4821VVZaffect
the4822DTthe
earth4823NNearth
or4824CCor
affects4825VVZaffect
the4826DTthe
environment4827NNenvironment
,4828,,
it4829PPit
's4830VBZbe
going4831VVGgo
to4832TOto
spread4833VVspread
across4834RPacross
onto4835INonto
other4836JJother
parts4837NNSpart
of4838INof
the4839DTthe
Superfund4840NPSuperfund
site4841NNsite
.4842SENT.
And4843CCand
the4844DTthe
water4845NNwater
barriers4846NNSbarrier
that4847IN/thatthat
we4848PPwe
've4849VHPhave
discussed4850VVNdiscuss
in4851INin
this4852DTthis
case4853NNcase
are4854VBPbe
a4855DTa
good4856JJgood
example4857NNexample
,4858,,
where4859WRBwhere
EPA4860NPEPA
has4861VHZhave
a4862DTa
considered4863VVNconsider
plan4864NNplan
to4865TOto
treat4866VVtreat
the4867DTthe
water4868NNwater
in4869INin
a4870DTa
certain4871JJcertain
way4872NNway
,4873,,
and4874CCand
Respondents4875NNSrespondent
want4876VVPwant
to4877TOto
dig4878VVdig
...4879:...
I4880PPI
think4881VVPthink
it4882PPit
's4883VBZbe
an4884DTan
8,0004885CD@card@
-foot4886NN-foot
trench4887NNtrench
that4888WDTthat
would4889MDwould
change4890VVchange
the4891DTthe
gradient4892NNgradient
and4893CCand
would4894MDwould
physically4895RBphysically
change4896VVchange
the4897DTthe
land4898NNland
in4899INin
a4900DTa
way4901NNway
that4902WDTthat
could4903MDcould
endanger4904VVendanger
the4905DTthe
whole4906JJwhole
Superfund4907NPSuperfund
site4908NNsite
off4909RBoff
of4910INof
their4911PP$their
own4912JJown
property4913NNproperty
.4914SENT.
So4915RBso
it4916PPit
is4917VBZbe
true4918JJtrue
that4919IN/thatthat
when4920WRBwhen
you4921PPyou
live4922VVPlive
on4923INon
a4924DTa
Superfund4925NPSuperfund
site4926NNsite
and4927CCand
you4928PPyou
have4929VHPhave
large4930JJlarge
amounts4931NNSamount
of4932INof
toxic4933JJtoxic
chemicals4934NNSchemical
,4935,,
you4936PPyou
are4937VBPbe
more4938RBRmore
restricted4939VVNrestrict
in4940INin
the4941DTthe
kind4942NNkind
of4943INof
land4944NNland
use4945NNuse
that4946WDTthat
you4947PPyou
...4948:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4949LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But4950CCbut
it4951PPit
seems4952VVZseem
a4953DTa
very4954RBvery
indirect4955JJindirect
way4956NNway
for4957INfor
Congress4958NPCongress
to4959TOto
have4960VHhave
gone4961VVNgo
about4962INabout
this4963DTthis
,4964,,
as4965INas
Justice4966NPJustice
Kagan4967NPKagan
says4968VVZsay
,4969,,
to4970TOto
,4971,,
in4972INin
essence4973NNessence
,4974,,
hinder4975VVhinder
a4976DTa
landowner4977NNlandowner
from4978INfrom
doing4979VVGdo
any4980DTany
significant4981JJsignificant
action4982NNaction
for4983INfor
decades4984NNSdecade
.4985SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]4986LOC[MR. MICHEL]
I4987PPI
mean4988VVPmean
,4989,,
I4990PPI
think4991VVPthink
on4992INon
...4993:...
it4994PPit
's4995VBZbe
not4996RBnot
that4997IN/thatthat
strange4998JJstrange
to4999TOto
see5000VVsee
that5001IN/thatthat
an5002DTan
owner5003NNowner
of5004INof
a5005DTa
Superfund5006NPSuperfund
site5007NNsite
,5008,,
somebody5009NNsomebody
who5010WPwho
lives5011VVZlive
on5012INon
a5013DTa
contaminated5014JJcontaminated
property5015NNproperty
,5016,,
is5017VBZbe
hindered5018VVNhinder
from5019INfrom
taking5020VVGtake
remedial5021JJremedial
action5022NNaction
,5023,,
which5024WDTwhich
is5025VBZbe
a5026DTa
fairly5027RBfairly
significant5028JJsignificant
action5029NNaction
,5030,,
without5031INwithout
EPA5032NPEPA
approval5033NNapproval
.5034SENT.
Of5035INof
course5036NNcourse
,5037,,
EPA5038NPEPA
can5039MDcan
grant5040VVgrant
approval5041NNapproval
,5042,,
and5043CCand
EPA5044NPEPA
has5045VHZhave
in5046INin
other5047JJother
cases5048NNScase
granted5049VVDgrant
approval5050NNapproval
for5051INfor
remedial5052JJremedial
actions5053NNSaction
on5054INon
Superfund5055NPSuperfund
sites5056NNSsite
.5057SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5058LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
So5059INso
your5060PP$your
two5061CDtwo
answers5062NNSanswer
are5063VBPbe
,5064,,
one5065CDone
,5066,,
it5067PPit
's5068VBZbe
only5069RBonly
significant5070JJsignificant
action5071NNaction
and5072CCand
,5073,,
two5074CDtwo
,5075,,
EPA5076NPEPA
could5077MDcould
grant5078VVgrant
approval5079NNapproval
?5080SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]5081LOC[MR. MICHEL]
Absolutely5082RBabsolutely
.5083SENT.
It5084PPit
's5085VBZbe
a5086DTa
...5087:...
so5088RBso
it5089PPit
's5090VBZbe
a5091DTa
limited5092JJlimited
incursion5093NNincursion
to5094TOto
the5095DTthe
degree5096NNdegree
that5097IN/thatthat
it5098PPit
restricts5099VVZrestrict
property5100NNproperty
rights5101NNSright
.5102SENT.
That5103DTthat
's5104VBZbe
what5105WPwhat
comes5106VVZcome
with5107INwith
living5108VVGlive
on5109RPon
...5110:...
on5111INon
a5112DTa
Superfund5113NPSuperfund
site5114NNsite
,5115,,
and5116CCand
that5117DTthat
's5118VBZbe
what5119WPwhat
's5120VBZbe
necessary5121JJnecessary
to5122TOto
protect5123VVprotect
...5124:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5125LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Then5126RBthen
...5127:...
then5128RBthen
what5129WPwhat
is5130VBZbe
your5131PP$your
answer5132NNanswer
to5133TOto
the5134DTthe
question5135NNquestion
Ms5136NNMs
.5137SENT.
Blatt5138NPBlatt
was5139VBDbe
asked5140VVNask
?5141SENT?
If5142INif
we5143PPwe
say5144VVPsay
the5145DTthe
landowners5146NNSlandowner
are5147VBPbe
PRPs5148NPPRPs
and5149CCand
they5150PPthey
have5151VHPhave
to5152TOto
get5153VVget
EPA5154NPEPA
permission5155NNpermission
for5156INfor
any5157DTany
restoration5158NNrestoration
that5159IN/thatthat
they5160PPthey
want5161VVPwant
to5162TOto
do5163VVdo
,5164,,
if5165INif
the5166DTthe
Court5167NPCourt
said5168VVDsay
that5169IN/thatthat
,5170,,
then5171RBthen
I5172PPI
do5173VVPdo
n't5174RBn't
see5175VVsee
that5176IN/thatthat
the5177DTthe
further5178JJRfurther
questions5179NNSquestion
in5180INin
this5181DTthis
case5182NNcase
need5183VVPneed
to5184TOto
be5185VBbe
answered5186VVNanswer
.5187SENT.
And5188CCand
I5189PPI
do5190VVPdo
n't5191RBn't
see5192VVsee
any5193DTany
reason5194NNreason
to5195TOto
get5196VVget
into5197INinto
preemption5198NNpreemption
.5199SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]5200LOC[MR. MICHEL]
I5201PPI
agree5202VVPagree
with5203INwith
you5204PPyou
,5205,,
Justice5206NPJustice
Ginsburg5207NPGinsburg
.5208SENT.
You5209PPyou
could5210MDcould
resolve5211VVresolve
the5212DTthe
case5213NNcase
by5214INby
...5215:...
by5216INby
saying5217VVGsay
that5218IN/thatthat
Respondents5219NNSrespondent
are5220VBPbe
PRPs5221NNSPRPs
who5222WPwho
need5223VVPneed
EPA5224NPEPA
authorization5225NNauthorization
...5226:...
authorization5227NNauthorization
and5228CCand
do5229VVPdo
n't5230RBn't
have5231VHhave
it5232PPit
and5233CCand
,5234,,
therefore5235RBtherefore
,5236,,
their5237PP$their
...5238:...
their5239PP$their
claim5240NNclaim
fails5241VVZfail
.5242SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]5243LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
What5244WPWhat
do5245VVPdo
we5246PPwe
do5247VVPdo
about5248INabout
the5249DTthe
government5250NNgovernment
's5251POS's
prior5252JJprior
representations5253NNSrepresentation
that5254IN/thatthat
permission5255NNpermission
might5256MDmight
be5257VBbe
granted5258VVNgrant
for5259INfor
something5260NNsomething
like5261INlike
this5262DTthis
?5263SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]5264LOC[MR. MICHEL]
Well5265UHwell
,5266,,
I5267PPI
mean5268VVPmean
,5269,,
the5270DTthe
government5271NNgovernment
stands5272VVZstand
ready5273JJready
to5274TOto
listen5275VVlisten
to5276TOto
EPA5277NPEPA
...5278:...
to5279TOto
any5280DTany
proposals5281NNSproposal
from5282INfrom
the5283DTthe
landowners5284NNSlandowner
.5285SENT.
They5286PPthey
have5287VHPhave
not5288RBnot
formally5289RBformally
presented5290VVNpresent
us5291PPus
with5292INwith
any5293DTany
proposals5294NNSproposal
,5295,,
so5296RBso
we5297PPwe
're5298VBPbe
working5299VVGwork
off5300RPoff
of5301INof
the5302DTthe
best5303RBSwell
available5304JJavailable
information5305NNinformation
,5306,,
which5307WDTwhich
is5308VBZbe
the5309DTthe
expert5310NNexpert
reports5311VVZreport
that5312IN/thatthat
they5313PPthey
have5314VHPhave
introduced5315VVNintroduce
in5316INin
the5317DTthe
state5318NNstate
litigation5319NNlitigation
.5320SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]5321LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
So5322INso
it5323PPit
's5324VBZbe
still5325RBstill
at5326INat
least5327JJSleast
possible5328JJpossible
that5329IN/thatthat
the5330DTthe
government5331NNgovernment
might5332MDmight
approve5333VVapprove
something5334NNsomething
like5335INlike
this5336DTthis
?5337SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]5338LOC[MR. MICHEL]
I5339PPI
mean5340VVPmean
,5341,,
based5342VVNbase
on5343INon
what5344WPwhat
we5345PPwe
know5346VVPknow
,5347,,
we5348PPwe
've5349VHPhave
made5350VVNmake
very5351RBvery
clear5352JJclear
,5353,,
we5354PPwe
're5355VBPbe
now5356RBnow
in5357INin
the5358DTthe
Supreme5359NPSupreme
Court5360NPCourt
litigating5361VVGlitigate
this5362DTthis
case5363NNcase
,5364,,
that5365WDTthat
we5366PPwe
would5367MDwould
not5368RBnot
approve5369VVapprove
what5370WPwhat
we5371PPwe
understand5372VVPunderstand
their5373PP$their
plan5374NNplan
to5375TOto
be5376VBbe
,5377,,
but5378CCbut
we5379PPwe
're5380VBPbe
not5381RBnot
saying5382VVGsay
never5383RBnever
.5384SENT.
Of5385INof
course5386NNcourse
,5387,,
they5388PPthey
could5389MDcould
present5390VVpresent
something5391NNsomething
and5392CCand
we5393PPwe
would5394MDwould
listen5395VVlisten
to5396TOto
it5397PPit
.5398SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]5399LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
And5400CCand
I5401PPI
might5402MDmight
...5403:...
might5404MDmight
have5405VHhave
missed5406VVNmiss
it5407PPit
,5408,,
but5409CCbut
just5410RBjust
when5411WRBwhen
is5412VBZbe
the5413DTthe
government5414NNgovernment
's5415POS's
role5416NNrole
here5417RBhere
likely5418JJlikely
to5419TOto
finish5420VVfinish
in5421INin
this5422DTthis
particular5423JJparticular
site5424NNsite
?5425SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]5426LOC[MR. MICHEL]
So5427INso
I5428PPI
think5429VVPthink
the5430DTthe
government5431NNgovernment
...5432:...
the5433DTthe
ongoing5434JJongoing
remediation5435NNremediation
will5436MDwill
continue5437VVcontinue
through5438INthrough
20255439CD@card@
,5440,,
is5441VBZbe
the5442DTthe
latest5443JJSlate
...5444:...
is5445VBZbe
the5446DTthe
latest5447JJSlate
projection5448NNprojection
.5449SENT.
It5450PPit
may5451MDmay
be5452VBbe
that5453DTthat
,5454,,
you5455PPyou
know5456VVPknow
,5457,,
there5458EXthere
are5459VBPbe
continuing5460VVGcontinue
operations5461NNSoperation
beyond5462INbeyond
that5463DTthat
,5464,,
but5465CCbut
the5466DTthe
active5467JJactive
site5468NNsite
remediation5469NNremediation
we5470PPwe
expect5471VVPexpect
to5472TOto
continue5473VVcontinue
through5474INthrough
about5475RBabout
205476CD@card@
20255477CD@card@
.5478SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]5479LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Is5480VBZbe
there5481RBthere
...5482:...
is5483VBZbe
there5484RBthere
a5485DTa
takings5486NNStaking
claim5487VVPclaim
,5488,,
do5489VVPdo
you5490PPyou
think5491VVPthink
,5492,,
that5493WDTthat
arises5494VVZarise
from5495INfrom
the5496DTthe
government5497NNgovernment
's5498POS's
position5499NNposition
that5500IN/thatthat
any5501DTany
remediation5502NNremediation
efforts5503NNSeffort
for5504INfor
a5505DTa
period5506NNperiod
of5507INof
,5508,,
I5509PPI
guess5510VVPguess
,5511,,
455512CD@card@
years5513NNSyear
is5514VBZbe
prohibited5515VVNprohibit
by5516INby
landowners5517NNSlandowner
?5518SENT?
[MR. MICHEL]5519LOC[MR. MICHEL]
I5520PPI
mean5521VVPmean
,5522,,
in5523INin
the5524DTthe
literal5525JJliteral
sense5526NNsense
,5527,,
there5528EXthere
's5529VBZbe
no5530DTno
takings5531NNStaking
claim5532VVPclaim
because5533INbecause
they5534PPthey
have5535VHPhave
n't5536RBn't
raised5537VVNraise
one5538CDone
in5539INin
this5540DTthis
case5541NNcase
.5542SENT.
I5543PPI
think5544VVPthink
more5545JJRmore
...5546:...
more5547RBRmore
broadly5548RBbroadly
...5549:...
of5550INof
course5551NNcourse
,5552,,
one5553PPone
could5554MDcould
raise5555VVraise
a5556DTa
takings5557NNStaking
claim5558VVPclaim
,5559,,
but5560CCbut
I5561PPI
think5562VVPthink
it5563PPit
would5564MDwould
be5565VBbe
a5566DTa
very5567RBvery
weak5568JJweak
claim5569NNclaim
given5570VVNgive
that5571IN/thatthat
,5572,,
in5573INin
fact5574NNfact
,5575,,
EPA5576NPEPA
's5577POS's
remedy5578NNremedy
has5579VHZhave
improved5580VVNimprove
the5581DTthe
value5582NNvalue
of5583INof
the5584DTthe
property5585NNproperty
and5586CCand
that5587IN/thatthat
you5588PPyou
have5589VHPhave
to5590TOto
start5591VVstart
from5592INfrom
the5593DTthe
premise5594NNpremise
that5595IN/thatthat
the5596DTthe
property5597NNproperty
is5598VBZbe
...5599:...
is5600VBZbe
covered5601VVNcover
with5602INwith
arsenic5603NNarsenic
.5604SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]5605LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well5606UHwell
,5607,,
it5608PPit
's5609VBZbe
...5610:...
it5611PPit
's5612VBZbe
...5613:...
it5614PPit
's5615VHZhave
improved5616VVNimprove
the5617DTthe
value5618NNvalue
of5619INof
the5620DTthe
property5621NNproperty
from5622INfrom
its5623PP$its
prior5624JJprior
state5625NNstate
but5626CCbut
not5627RBnot
...5628:...
not5629RBnot
to5630TOto
a5631DTa
level5632NNlevel
that5633IN/thatthat
state5634NNstate
law5635NNlaw
would5636MDwould
allow5637VVallow
.5638SENT.
[MR. MICHEL]5639LOC[MR. MICHEL]
Well5640UHWell
,5641,,
I5642PPI
...5643:...
I5644PPI
do5645VVPdo
think5646VVthink
that5647IN/thatthat
that5648DTthat
's5649VBZbe
an5650DTan
important5651JJimportant
point5652NNpoint
,5653,,
Justice5654NPJustice
Gorsuch5655NPGorsuch
,5656,,
is5657VBZbe
that5658IN/thatthat
the5659DTthe
EPA5660NPEPA
plan5661NNplan
fully5662RBfully
complies5663VVZcomply
with5664INwith
the5665DTthe
state5666NNstate
environmental5667JJenvironmental
laws5668NNSlaw
.5669SENT.
Those5670DTthose
are5671VBPbe
the5672DTthe
ARARs5673NNSARARs
that5674IN/thatthat
I5675PPI
mentioned5676VVDmention
earlier5677RBRearlier
.5678SENT.
This5679DTthis
is5680VBZbe
a5681DTa
separate5682JJseparate
private5683JJprivate
plan5684NNplan
that5685IN/thatthat
a5686DTa
jury5687NNjury
would5688MDwould
have5689VHhave
to5690TOto
approve5691VVapprove
.5692SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5693LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank5694VVthank
you5695PPyou
,5696,,
counsel5697NNcounsel
.5698SENT.
Mr5699NPMr
.5700SENT.
Palmore5701NPPalmore
.5702SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]5703LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Thank5704VVthank
you5705PPyou
,5706,,
Mr5707NPMr
.5708SENT.
Chief5709NPChief
Justice5710NPJustice
,5711,,
and5712CCand
may5713MDmay
it5714PPit
please5715VVplease
the5716DTthe
Court5717NPCourt
:5718::
This5719DTthis
Court5720NPCourt
lacks5721VVZlack
jurisdiction5722NNjurisdiction
,5723,,
but5724CCbut
,5725,,
if5726INif
it5727PPit
finds5728VVZfind
it5729PPit
has5730VHZhave
jurisdiction5731NNjurisdiction
,5732,,
it5733PPit
should5734MDshould
affirm5735VVaffirm
.5736SENT.
Briefly5737RBbriefly
on5738INon
jurisdiction5739NNjurisdiction
:5740::
The5741DTthe
decision5742NNdecision
below5743INbelow
affirming5744VVGaffirm
denial5745NNdenial
of5746INof
summary5747NNsummary
judgment5748NNjudgment
on5749INon
one5750CDone
damages5751NNSdamage
theory5752NNtheory
and5753CCand
remanding5754VVGremand
for5755INfor
trial5756NNtrial
is5757VBZbe
non-final5758JJnon-final
.5759SENT.
This5760DTthis
Court5761NPCourt
has5762VHZhave
exercised5763VVNexercise
review5764NNreview
over5765INover
Montana5766NPMontana
's5767POS's
supervisory5768JJsupervisory
writ5769NNwrit
decisions5770NNSdecision
only5771RBonly
where5772WRBwhere
reversal5773NNreversal
by5774INby
this5775DTthis
Court5776NPCourt
would5777MDwould
end5778VVend
the5779DTthe
case5780NNcase
entirely5781RBentirely
.5782SENT.
That5783DTthat
critical5784JJcritical
condition5785NNcondition
is5786VBZbe
absent5787JJabsent
here5788RBhere
.5789SENT.
On5790INon
the5791DTthe
merits5792NNSmerit
:5793::
This5794DTthis
Court5795NPCourt
held5796VVNhold
and5797CCand
explained5798VVNexplain
in5799INin
CTS5800NPCTS
versus5801CCversus
Waldburger5802NPWaldburger
...5803:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5804LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
If5805INif
we5806PPwe
...5807:...
I5808PPI
'm5809VBPbe
sorry5810JJsorry
,5811,,
go5812VVgo
ahead5813RBahead
.5814SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]5815LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...5816:...
that5817WDTthat
CERCLA5818NPCERCLA
does5819VVZdo
not5820RBnot
establish5821VVestablish
a5822DTa
comprehensive5823JJcomprehensive
remedial5824JJremedial
framework5825NNframework
;5826:;
instead5827RBinstead
,5828,,
it5829PPit
leaves5830VVZleave
untouched5831JJuntouched
state5832NNstate
judgments5833NNSjudgment
about5834INabout
causes5835NNScause
of5836INof
action5837NNaction
and5838CCand
the5839DTthe
scope5840NNscope
of5841INof
liability5842NNliability
for5843INfor
property5844NNproperty
damage5845NNdamage
.5846SENT.
Montana5847NPMontana
,5848,,
like5849INlike
many5850JJmany
other5851JJother
states5852NNSstate
,5853,,
has5854VHZhave
made5855VVNmake
the5856DTthe
judgment5857NNjudgment
that5858DTthat
one5859CDone
who5860WPwho
puts5861VVZput
toxic5862JJtoxic
materials5863NNSmaterial
on5864INon
another5865DTanother
person5866NNperson
's5867POS's
property5868NNproperty
is5869VBZbe
liable5870JJliable
for5871INfor
trespass5872NNtrespass
and5873CCand
nuisance5874JJnuisance
and5875CCand
that5876IN/thatthat
a5877DTa
measure5878NNmeasure
of5879INof
recovery5880NNrecovery
is5881VBZbe
the5882DTthe
cost5883NNcost
of5884INof
removal5885NNremoval
.5886SENT.
Nothing5887NNnothing
in5888INin
CERCLA5889NPCERCLA
bars5890VVZbar
that5891IN/thatthat
core5892JJcore
exercise5893NNexercise
of5894INof
state5895NNstate
authority5896NNauthority
to5897TOto
vindicate5898VVvindicate
private5899JJprivate
property5900NNproperty
rights5901NNSright
.5902SENT.
ARCO5903NPARCO
's5904POS's
invocation5905NNinvocation
of5906INof
Section5907NPSection
1135908CD@card@
(5909((
h5910NNh
)5911))
fails5912VVZfail
...5913:...
that5914WDTthat
's5915VBZbe
the5916DTthe
challenge5917NNchallenge
provision5918NNprovision
...5919:...
because5920INbecause
it5921PPit
does5922VVZdo
n't5923RBn't
apply5924VVapply
in5925INin
federal5926JJfederal
court5927NNcourt
and5928CCand
even5929RBeven
in5930INin
federal5931JJfederal
court5932NNcourt
,5933,,
it5934PPit
does5935VVZdo
n't5936RBn't
apply5937VVapply
to5938TOto
state5939VVstate
law5940NNlaw
claims5941NNSclaim
.5942SENT.
ARCO5943NPARCO
fares5944VVZfare
no5945RBno
better5946JJRgood
on5947INon
Section5948NPSection
1225949CD@card@
(5950((
e5951LSe
)5952))
(5953((
65954CD6
)5955))
,5956,,
the5957DTthe
PRP5958NPPRP
provision5959NNprovision
,5960,,
because5961INbecause
the5962DTthe
landowners5963NNSlandowner
here5964RBhere
are5965VBPbe
not5966RBnot
potentially5967RBpotentially
responsible5968JJresponsible
for5969INfor
anything5970NNanything
because5971INbecause
they5972PPthey
face5973VVPface
no5974DTno
possible5975JJpossible
liability5976NNliability
.5977SENT.
And5978CCand
that5979DTthat
provision5980NNprovision
certainly5981RBcertainly
cannot5982MDcan
be5983VBbe
read5984VVNread
to5985TOto
give5986VVgive
EPA5987NPEPA
the5988DTthe
vast5989JJvast
power5990NNpower
that5991IN/thatthat
it5992PPit
seeks5993VVZseek
,5994,,
the5995DTthe
ability5996NNability
to5997TOto
control5998VVcontrol
forever5999RBforever
the6000DTthe
removal6001NNremoval
of6002INof
a6003DTa
shovelful6004NNshovelful
of6005INof
dirt6006NNdirt
from6007INfrom
a6008DTa
private6009JJprivate
landowner6010NNlandowner
's6011POS's
backyard6012NNbackyard
.6013SENT.
There6014EXthere
's6015VBZbe
no6016DTno
basis6017NNbasis
for6018INfor
preemption6019NNpreemption
either6020RBeither
.6021SENT.
CERCLA6022NPCERCLA
establishes6023VVZestablish
a6024DTa
floor6025NNfloor
,6026,,
not6027RBnot
a6028DTa
ceiling6029NNceiling
,6030,,
on6031INon
environmental6032JJenvironmental
remediation6033NNremediation
,6034,,
and6035CCand
in6036INin
several6037JJseveral
provisions6038NNSprovision
makes6039VVZmake
clear6040JJclear
that6041IN/thatthat
Congress6042NPCongress
wanted6043VVDwant
to6044TOto
leave6045VVleave
state6046NNstate
law6047NNlaw
in6048INin
place6049NNplace
.6050SENT.
Nor6051CCnor
is6052VBZbe
there6053RBthere
any6054DTany
impossibility6055NNimpossibility
.6056SENT.
The6057DTthe
duty6058NNduty
that6059IN/thatthat
ARCO6060NPARCO
breached6061VVDbreach
was6062VBDbe
the6063DTthe
duty6064NNduty
not6065RBnot
to6066TOto
pollute6067VVpollute
.6068SENT.
Nothing6069NNnothing
in6070INin
federal6071JJfederal
law6072NNlaw
required6073VVDrequire
it6074PPit
to6075TOto
do6076VVdo
so6077RBso
.6078SENT.
Justice6079NPJustice
Sotomayor6080NPSotomayor
?6081SENT?
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6082LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I6083PPI
...6084:...
I6085PPI
still6086RBstill
have6087VHPhave
a6088DTa
problem6089NNproblem
,6090,,
which6091WDTwhich
is6092VBZbe
it6093PPit
seems6094VVZseem
to6095TOto
me6096PPme
that6097IN/thatthat
if6098INif
you6099PPyou
go6100VVPgo
on6101INon
a6102DTa
piece6103NNpiece
of6104INof
...6105:...
if6106INif
you6107PPyou
own6108VVPown
a6109DTa
piece6110NNpiece
of6111INof
land6112NNland
and6113CCand
you6114PPyou
know6115VVPknow
the6116DTthe
EPA6117NPEPA
has6118VHZhave
been6119VBNbe
fixing6120VVGfix
it6121PPit
up6122RPup
,6123,,
that6124IN/thatthat
whether6125INwhether
you6126PPyou
're6127VBPbe
responsible6128JJresponsible
financially6129RBfinancially
for6130INfor
the6131DTthe
cleanup6132NNcleanup
,6133,,
that6134WDTthat
you6135PPyou
should6136MDshould
n't6137RBn't
be6138VBbe
able6139JJable
to6140TOto
interfere6141VVinterfere
with6142INwith
the6143DTthe
EPA6144NPEPA
's6145POS's
efforts6146NNSeffort
,6147,,
meaning6148VVGmean
you6149PPyou
might6150MDmight
have6151VHhave
a6152DTa
takings6153NNStaking
claim6154VVPclaim
,6155,,
as6156INas
Justice6157NPJustice
Gorsuch6158NPGorsuch
claims6159VVZclaim
,6160,,
you6161PPyou
might6162MDmight
have6163VHhave
some6164DTsome
other6165JJother
claims6166NNSclaim
,6167,,
but6168CCbut
I6169PPI
do6170VVPdo
n't6171RBn't
know6172VVknow
how6173WRBhow
you6174PPyou
can6175MDcan
go6176VVgo
about6177INabout
instituting6178VVGinstitute
a6179DTa
plan6180NNplan
without6181INwithout
conflict6182NNconflict
preemption6183NNpreemption
,6184,,
instituting6185VVGinstitute
a6186DTa
plan6187NNplan
that6188WDTthat
interferes6189VVZinterfere
with6190INwith
what6191WPwhat
the6192DTthe
EPA6193NPEPA
is6194VBZbe
doing6195VVGdo
.6196SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]6197LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Your6198PP$your
Honor6199NPHonor
,6200,,
first6201JJfirst
of6202INof
all6203DTall
,6204,,
and6205CCand
this6206DTthis
is6207VBZbe
critical6208JJcritical
,6209,,
there6210EXthere
is6211VBZbe
no6212DTno
interference6213NNinterference
here6214RBhere
.6215SENT.
The6216DTthe
vast6217JJvast
majority6218NNmajority
of6219INof
my6220PP$my
clients6221NNSclient
have6222VHPhave
had6223VHNhave
zero6224CDzero
work6225NNwork
done6226VVNdo
on6227INon
their6228PP$their
land6229NNland
.6230SENT.
And6231CCand
if6232INif
you6233PPyou
put6234VVPput
all6235PDTall
their6236PP$their
land6237NNland
together6238RBtogether
,6239,,
the6240DTthe
work6241NNwork
has6242VHZhave
been6243VBNbe
done6244VVNdo
on6245INon
only6246JJonly
percent6247NNpercent
,6248,,
okay6249JJokay
?6250SENT?
So6251RBso
,6252,,
on6253INon
956254CD@card@
percent6255NNpercent
of6256INof
the6257DTthe
land6258NNland
,6259,,
literally6260RBliterally
nothing6261NNnothing
has6262VHZhave
been6263VBNbe
done6264VVNdo
.6265SENT.
So6266RBso
there6267EXthere
's6268VBZbe
no6269DTno
undoing6270NNundoing
there6271RBthere
.6272SENT.
On6273INon
groundwater6274NNgroundwater
,6275,,
EPA6276NPEPA
made6277VVDmake
the6278DTthe
decision6279NNdecision
to6280TOto
do6281VVdo
nothing6282NNnothing
to6283TOto
clean6284VVclean
the6285DTthe
groundwater6286NNgroundwater
in6287INin
Opportunity6288NPOpportunity
,6289,,
so6290RBso
we6291PPwe
're6292VBPbe
not6293RBnot
undoing6294VVGundo
a6295DTa
remedy6296NNremedy
.6297SENT.
We6298PPwe
're6299VBPbe
doing6300VVGdo
something6301NNsomething
that6302IN/thatthat
EPA6303NPEPA
...6304:...
where6305WRBwhere
EPA6306NPEPA
has6307VHZhave
done6308VVNdo
nothing6309NNnothing
.6310SENT.
And6311CCand
what6312WPwhat
's6313VBZbe
the6314DTthe
56315CD5
percent6316NNpercent
?6317SENT?
They6318PPthey
dug6319VVDdig
down6320RBdown
186321CD@card@
inches6322NNSinch
,6323,,
they6324PPthey
put6325VVDput
in6326INin
clean6327JJclean
soil6328NNsoil
,6329,,
and6330CCand
they6331PPthey
planted6332VVDplant
grass6333NNgrass
.6334SENT.
All6335RBall
we6336PPwe
want6337VVPwant
to6338TOto
do6339VVdo
...6340:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]6341LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well6342UHWell
,6343,,
on6344INon
the6345DTthe
ground6346NNground
...6347:...
on6348INon
the6349DTthe
groundwater6350NNgroundwater
,6351,,
I6352PPI
understand6353VVPunderstand
their6354PP$their
position6355NNposition
to6356TOto
be6357VBbe
that6358IN/thatthat
if6359INif
they6360PPthey
did6361VVDdo
do6362VVdo
something6363NNsomething
along6364INalong
the6365DTthe
lines6366NNSline
that6367IN/thatthat
you6368PPyou
're6369VBPbe
proposing6370VVGpropose
,6371,,
it6372PPit
would6373MDwould
have6374VHhave
very6375RBvery
significant6376JJsignificant
adverse6377JJadverse
impacts6378NNSimpact
.6379SENT.
So6380INso
the6381DTthe
fact6382NNfact
that6383IN/thatthat
they6384PPthey
have6385VHPhave
n't6386RBn't
done6387VVNdo
anything6388NNanything
,6389,,
that6390WDTthat
's6391VBZbe
what6392WPwhat
they6393PPthey
want6394VVPwant
you6395PPyou
...6396:...
they6397PPthey
do6398VVPdo
n't6399RBn't
want6400VVwant
you6401PPyou
to6402TOto
do6403VVdo
anything6404NNanything
.6405SENT.
So6406RBso
you6407PPyou
can6408MDcan
't6409RB't
say6410VVsay
having6411VHGhave
...6412:...
having6413VHGhave
done6414VVNdo
nothing6415NNnothing
represents6416VVZrepresent
that6417IN/thatthat
there6418EXthere
's6419VBZbe
no6420DTno
...6421:...
there6422EXthere
would6423MDwould
be6424VBbe
no6425DTno
adverse6426JJadverse
impact6427NNimpact
from6428INfrom
what6429WPwhat
you6430PPyou
plan6431VVPplan
to6432TOto
do6433VVdo
.6434SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]6435LOC[MR. PALMORE]
A6436DTa
couple6437NNcouple
answers6438VVZanswer
on6439INon
that6440DTthat
,6441,,
Chief6442NPChief
Justice6443NPJustice
Roberts6444NPRoberts
.6445SENT.
First6446JJfirst
of6447INof
all6448DTall
,6449,,
they6450PPthey
decided6451VVDdecide
,6452,,
and6453CCand
if6454INif
you6455PPyou
look6456VVPlook
at6457INat
the6458DTthe
actual6459JJactual
regulatory6460JJregulatory
materials6461NNSmaterial
,6462,,
and6463CCand
that6464DTthat
...6465:...
the6466DTthe
EPA6467NPEPA
makes6468VVZmake
decisions6469NNSdecision
in6470INin
this6471DTthis
area6472NNarea
through6473INthrough
records6474NNSrecord
of6475INof
decision6476NNdecision
,6477,,
which6478WDTwhich
are6479VBPbe
official6480JJofficial
documents6481NNSdocument
,6482,,
they6483PPthey
say6484VVPsay
they6485PPthey
did6486VVDdo
n't6487RBn't
want6488VVwant
to6489TOto
do6490VVdo
the6491DTthe
groundwater6492NNgroundwater
remedy6493NNremedy
,6494,,
it6495PPit
was6496VBDbe
a6497DTa
different6498JJdifferent
wall6499NNwall
,6500,,
it6501PPit
was6502VBDbe
a6503DTa
different6504JJdifferent
one6505CDone
,6506,,
because6507INbecause
it6508PPit
was6509VBDbe
technically6510RBtechnically
impracticable6511JJimpracticable
,6512,,
which6513WDTwhich
is6514VBZbe
a6515DTa
term6516NNterm
of6517INof
art6518NNart
under6519INunder
CERCLA6520NPCERCLA
for6521INfor
too6522RBtoo
expensive6523JJexpensive
.6524SENT.
In6525INin
the6526DTthe
regulatory6527JJregulatory
materials6528NNSmaterial
,6529,,
there6530EXthere
is6531VBZbe
absolutely6532RBabsolutely
no6533DTno
finding6534NNfinding
that6535IN/thatthat
that6536DTthat
wall6537NNwall
,6538,,
much6539RBmuch
less6540JJRless
the6541DTthe
one6542CDone
that6543IN/thatthat
we6544PPwe
've6545VHPhave
proposed6546VVNpropose
which6547WDTwhich
is6548VBZbe
different6549JJdifferent
,6550,,
would6551MDwould
call6552VVcall
any6553DTany
environmental6554JJenvironmental
harm6555NNharm
.6556SENT.
If6557INif
you6558PPyou
look6559VVPlook
to6560TOto
what6561WPwhat
the6562DTthe
government6563NNgovernment
cites6564VVZcite
here6565RBhere
for6566INfor
that6567DTthat
proposition6568NNproposition
,6569,,
if6570INif
you6571PPyou
trace6572VVPtrace
it6573PPit
through6574RPthrough
,6575,,
it6576PPit
's6577VBZbe
citing6578VVGcite
its6579PP$its
own6580JJown
amicus6581NNamicus
brief6582NNbrief
in6583INin
the6584DTthe
Montana6585NPMontana
Supreme6586NPSupreme
Court6587NPCourt
.6588SENT.
If6589INif
you6590PPyou
look6591VVPlook
at6592INat
the6593DTthe
Montana6594NPMontana
Supreme6595NPSupreme
Court6596NPCourt
amicus6597NNamicus
brief6598NNbrief
,6599,,
the6600DTthe
government6601NNgovernment
cites6602VVZcite
literally6603RBliterally
nothing6604NNnothing
.6605SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]6606LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
So6607INso
you6608PPyou
're6609VBPbe
talking6610VVGtalk
about6611INabout
the6612DTthe
particular6613JJparticular
specifics6614NNSspecific
in6615INin
your6616PP$your
case6617NNcase
.6618SENT.
But6619CCbut
,6620,,
as6621INas
a6622DTa
general6623JJgeneral
matter6624NNmatter
,6625,,
for6626INfor
example6627NNexample
,6628,,
you6629PPyou
can6630MDcan
understand6631VVunderstand
that6632IN/thatthat
the6633DTthe
EPA6634NPEPA
looking6635VVGlook
at6636INat
this6637DTthis
might6638MDmight
say6639VVsay
,6640,,
okay6641RBokay
,6642,,
we6643PPwe
're6644VBPbe
going6645VVGgo
to6646TOto
do6647VVdo
this6648DTthis
,6649,,
we6650PPwe
're6651VBPbe
going6652VVGgo
to6653TOto
do6654VVdo
this6655DTthis
,6656,,
we6657PPwe
're6658VBPbe
going6659VVGgo
to6660TOto
do6661VVdo
this6662DTthis
,6663,,
and6664CCand
we6665PPwe
're6666VBPbe
going6667VVGgo
to6668TOto
get6669VVget
to6670TOto
that6671DTthat
as6672RBas
soon6673RBsoon
as6674INas
we6675PPwe
're6676VBPbe
done6677VVNdo
doing6678VVGdo
this6679DTthis
other6680JJother
stuff6681NNstuff
.6682SENT.
And6683CCand
yet6684RByet
someone6685NNsomeone
else6686RBelse
in6687INin
your6688PP$your
position6689NNposition
would6690MDwould
come6691VVcome
in6692RPin
and6693CCand
say6694VVsay
:6695::
Well6696UHWell
,6697,,
you6698PPyou
're6699VBPbe
not6700RBnot
doing6701VVGdo
anything6702NNanything
here6703RBhere
,6704,,
and6705CCand
so6706RBso
we6707PPwe
're6708VBPbe
going6709VVGgo
to6710TOto
go6711VVgo
ahead6712RBahead
and6713CCand
do6714VVdo
this6715DTthis
,6716,,
when6717WRBwhen
the6718DTthe
EPA6719NPEPA
's6720POS's
answer6721NNanswer
might6722MDmight
simply6723RBsimply
be6724VBbe
that6725IN/thatthat
well6726RBwell
,6727,,
we6728PPwe
have6729VHPhave
n't6730RBn't
gotten6731VVNget
to6732TOto
it6733PPit
yet6734RByet
,6735,,
but6736CCbut
we6737PPwe
want6738VVPwant
to6739TOto
be6740VBbe
the6741DTthe
ones6742NNSone
to6743TOto
decide6744VVdecide
what6745WPwhat
to6746TOto
do6747VVdo
,6748,,
rather6749RBrather
than6750INthan
the6751DTthe
particular6752JJparticular
landowners6753NNSlandowner
there6754RBthere
,6755,,
because6756INbecause
we6757PPwe
have6758VHPhave
a6759DTa
broader6760JJRbroad
perspective6761NNperspective
affecting6762VVGaffect
the6763DTthe
whole6764JJwhole
site6765NNsite
,6766,,
rather6767RBrather
than6768INthan
individual6769JJindividual
sites6770NNSsite
where6771WRBwhere
the6772DTthe
people6773NNSpeople
may6774MDmay
reasonably6775RBreasonably
want6776VVwant
something6777NNsomething
to6778TOto
be6779VBbe
done6780VVNdo
but6781CCbut
still6782RBstill
may6783MDmay
be6784VBbe
inconsistent6785JJinconsistent
with6786INwith
EPA6787NPEPA
's6788POS's
plan6789NNplan
.6790SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]6791LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Well6792UHWell
,6793,,
here6794RBhere
,6795,,
Mr6796NPMr
.6797SENT.
Chief6798NPChief
Justice6799NPJustice
,6800,,
the6801DTthe
issue6802NNissue
is6803VBZbe
n't6804RBn't
we6805PPwe
'll6806MDwill
get6807VVget
to6808TOto
that6809DTthat
later6810RBRlater
.6811SENT.
They6812PPthey
're6813VBPbe
done6814VVNdo
.6815SENT.
All6816PDTAll
the6817DTthe
remedial6818JJremedial
work6819NNwork
such6820JJsuch
as6821INas
it6822PPit
was6823VBDbe
on6824INon
our6825PP$our
property6826NNproperty
has6827VHZhave
been6828VBNbe
over6829INover
for6830INfor
several6831JJseveral
years6832NNSyear
.6833SENT.
They6834PPthey
are6835VBPbe
completely6836RBcompletely
done6837VVNdo
.6838SENT.
And6839CCand
that6840DTthat
's6841VBZbe
another6842DTanother
reason6843NNreason
why6844WRBwhy
there6845EXthere
's6846VBZbe
no6847DTno
interference6848NNinterference
with6849INwith
anything6850NNanything
they6851PPthey
're6852VBPbe
doing6853VVGdo
.6854SENT.
They6855PPthey
're6856VBPbe
finished6857VVNfinish
.6858SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]6859LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I6860PPI
'm6861VBPbe
trying6862VVGtry
to6863TOto
move6864VVmove
beyond6865INbeyond
your6866PP$your
particular6867NNparticular
...6868:...
[MR. PALMORE]6869LOC[MR. PALMORE]
And6870CCand
I6871PPI
understand6872VVPunderstand
that6873RBthat
.6874SENT.
So6875RBso
one6876PPone
can6877MDcan
imagine6878VVimagine
a6879DTa
different6880JJdifferent
case6881NNcase
involving6882VVGinvolve
a6883DTa
conflict6884NNconflict
preemption6885NNpreemption
claim6886NNclaim
with6887INwith
respect6888NNrespect
to6889TOto
the6890DTthe
EPA6891NPEPA
remedial6892JJremedial
orders6893NNSorder
.6894SENT.
That6895DTthat
's6896VBZbe
not6897RBnot
this6898DTthis
case6899NNcase
.6900SENT.
ARCO6901NPARCO
's6902POS's
argument6903NNargument
here6904RBhere
,6905,,
which6906WDTwhich
...6907:...
which6908WDTwhich
Ms6909NNMs
.6910SENT.
Blatt6911NPBlatt
articulated6912VVDarticulate
,6913,,
is6914VBZbe
that6915IN/thatthat
CERCLA6916NPCERCLA
itself6917PPitself
establishes6918VVZestablish
a6919DTa
floor6920NNfloor
and6921CCand
a6922DTa
ceiling6923NNceiling
,6924,,
such6925JJsuch
that6926IN/thatthat
any6927DTany
state6928NNstate
law6929NNlaw
remedy6930NNremedy
that6931WDTthat
goes6932VVZgo
beyond6933INbeyond
even6934RBeven
one6935CDone
inch6936NNinch
beyond6937INbeyond
what6938WPwhat
CERC6939NPCERC
...6940:...
what6941WPwhat
a6942DTa
remedial6943JJremedial
order6944NNorder
required6945VVNrequire
is6946VBZbe
preempted6947VVNpreempt
.6948SENT.
They6949PPthey
are6950VBPbe
not6951RBnot
making6952VVGmake
a6953DTa
very6954RBvery
different6955JJdifferent
argument6956NNargument
that6957IN/thatthat
in6958INin
...6959:...
perhaps6960RBperhaps
in6961INin
a6962DTa
case6963NNcase
like6964INlike
Your6965PP$your
Honor6966NPHonor
is6967VBZbe
referring6968VVGrefer
to6969TOto
could6970MDcould
be6971VBbe
made6972VVNmake
,6973,,
which6974WDTwhich
there6975RBthere
could6976MDcould
be6977VBbe
an6978DTan
argument6979NNargument
made6980VVDmake
that6981IN/thatthat
there6982EXthere
is6983VBZbe
obstacle6984NNobstacle
preemption6985NNpreemption
with6986INwith
respect6987NNrespect
to6988TOto
an6989DTan
actual6990JJactual
remedial6991JJremedial
order6992NNorder
.6993SENT.
That6994DTthat
case6995NNcase
might6996MDmight
look6997VVlook
a6998DTa
lot6999NNlot
like7000INlike
Geier7001NPGeier
,7002,,
right7003RBright
?7004SENT?
So7005RBso
if7006INif
in7007INin
a7008DTa
...7009:...
in7010INin
a7011DTa
case7012NNcase
EPA7013NPEPA
had7014VHDhave
evaluated7015VVNevaluate
various7016JJvarious
remedies7017NNSremedy
and7018CCand
it7019PPit
had7020VHDhave
rejected7021VVNreject
a7022DTa
remedy7023NNremedy
because7024INbecause
it7025PPit
said7026VVDsay
that7027IN/thatthat
remedy7028NNremedy
will7029MDwill
cause7030VVcause
environmental7031JJenvironmental
harm7032NNharm
,7033,,
so7034RBso
we7035PPwe
choose7036VVPchoose
not7037RBnot
to7038TOto
adopt7039VVadopt
it7040PPit
...7041:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]7042LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No7043NPNo
,7044,,
the7045DTthe
problem7046NNproblem
is7047VBZbe
n't7048RBn't
...7049:...
I7050PPI
do7051VVPdo
n't7052RBn't
think7053VVthink
the7054DTthe
problem7055NNproblem
we7056PPwe
're7057VBPbe
stating7058VVGstate
is7059VBZbe
anything7060NNanything
to7061TOto
do7062VVdo
with7063INwith
preemption7064NNpreemption
or7065CCor
anything7066NNanything
.7067SENT.
It7068PPit
's7069VBZbe
just7070RBjust
whether7071INwhether
someone7072NNsomeone
in7073INin
your7074PP$your
position7075NNposition
should7076MDshould
first7077RBfirst
have7078VHhave
to7079TOto
go7080VVgo
and7081CCand
get7082VVget
the7083DTthe
EPA7084NPEPA
's7085POS's
permission7086NNpermission
.7087SENT.
And7088CCand
you7089PPyou
're7090VBPbe
talking7091VVGtalk
about7092INabout
a7093DTa
shovel7094NNshovel
of7095INof
dirt7096NNdirt
or7097CCor
something7098NNsomething
.7099SENT.
Suppose7100VVsuppose
they7101PPthey
did7102VVDdo
do7103VVdo
something7104NNsomething
like7105INlike
that7106DTthat
.7107SENT.
Is7108VBZbe
n't7109RBn't
there7110RBthere
a7111DTa
remedy7112NNremedy
?7113SENT?
It7114PPit
's7115VHZhave
called7116VVNcall
the7117DTthe
Administrative7118NPAdministrative
Procedures7119NPSProcedures
Act7120NPAct
.7121SENT.
And7122CCand
you7123PPyou
say7124VVPsay
here7125RBhere
they7126PPthey
've7127VHPhave
made7128VVNmake
an7129DTan
administrative7130JJadministrative
procedure7131NNprocedure
,7132,,
and7133CCand
it7134PPit
was7135VBDbe
arbitrary7136JJarbitrary
,7137,,
capricious7138JJcapricious
,7139,,
and7140CCand
abuse7141NNabuse
of7142INof
discretion7143NNdiscretion
.7144SENT.
That7145DTthat
way7146NNway
,7147,,
as7148INas
the7149DTthe
Chief7150NPChief
said7151VVDsay
,7152,,
as7153INas
others7154NNSother
say7155VVPsay
,7156,,
we7157PPwe
channel7158VVPchannel
all7159PDTall
this7160DTthis
through7161INthrough
the7162DTthe
EPA7163NPEPA
and7164CCand
the7165DTthe
courts7166NNScourt
reviewing7167VVGreview
the7168DTthe
EPA7169NPEPA
.7170SENT.
And7171CCand
what7172WPwhat
we7173PPwe
do7174VVPdo
n't7175RBn't
have7176VHhave
is7177VBZbe
10,0007178CD@card@
juries7179NNSjury
or7180CCor
...7181:...
or7182CCor
507183CD@card@
states7184NNSstate
or7185CCor
whatever7186WDTwhatever
it7187PPit
is7188VBZbe
imposing7189VVGimpose
sometimes7190RBsometimes
conflicting7191JJconflicting
duties7192NNSduty
and7193CCand
leaving7194VVGleave
it7195PPit
up7196RPup
to7197TOto
hundreds7198NNShundred
of7199INof
different7200JJdifferent
judges7201NNSjudge
to7202TOto
decide7203VVdecide
.7204SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]7205LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Your7206PP$your
Honor7207NPHonor
,7208,,
a7209DTa
couple7210NNcouple
answers7211NNSanswer
.7212SENT.
One7213PPone
is7214VBZbe
EPA7215NPEPA
does7216VVZdo
n't7217RBn't
need7218VVneed
this7219DTthis
1227220CD@card@
(7221((
e7222LSe
)7223))
(7224((
67225CD6
)7226))
,7227,,
which7228WDTwhich
is7229VBZbe
what7230WPwhat
you7231PPyou
're7232VBPbe
referring7233VVGrefer
to7234TOto
,7235,,
to7236TOto
prevent7237VVprevent
harm7238NNharm
at7239INat
a7240DTa
Superfund7241NPSuperfund
site7242NNsite
or7243CCor
protect7244VVprotect
the7245DTthe
integrity7246NNintegrity
of7247INof
its7248PP$its
remedy7249NNremedy
.7250SENT.
The7251DTthe
government7252NNgovernment
made7253VVDmake
that7254DTthat
point7255NNpoint
at7256INat
page7257NNpage
177258CD@card@
of7259INof
its7260PP$its
invitation7261NNinvitation
brief7262NNbrief
.7263SENT.
It7264PPit
said7265VVDsay
we7266PPwe
have7267VHPhave
plenty7268NNplenty
of7269INof
tools7270NNStool
.7271SENT.
We7272PPwe
can7273MDcan
get7274VVget
administrative7275JJadministrative
orders7276NNSorder
.7277SENT.
We7278PPwe
can7279MDcan
get7280VVget
injunctions7281NNSinjunction
.7282SENT.
There7283EXthere
's7284VBZbe
no7285DTno
problem7286NNproblem
here7287RBhere
.7288SENT.
We7289PPwe
can7290MDcan
use7291VVuse
those7292DTthose
tools7293NNStool
to7294TOto
protect7295VVprotect
the7296DTthe
integrity7297NNintegrity
of7298INof
our7299PP$our
...7300:...
of7301INof
our7302PP$our
remedy7303NNremedy
.7304SENT.
1227305CD@card@
(7306((
e7307LSe
)7308))
(7309((
67310CD6
)7311))
applies7312VVZapply
only7313RBonly
to7314TOto
potentially7315RBpotentially
responsible7316JJresponsible
parties7317NNSparty
.7318SENT.
What7319WPWhat
is7320VBZbe
a7321DTa
potentially7322RBpotentially
responsible7323JJresponsible
party7324NNparty
?7325SENT?
It7326PPit
is7327VBZbe
not7328RBnot
defined7329VVNdefine
in7330INin
the7331DTthe
statute7332NNstatute
.7333SENT.
So7334RBso
,7335,,
under7336INunder
normal7337JJnormal
rules7338NNSrule
of7339INof
statutory7340JJstatutory
construction7341NNconstruction
,7342,,
this7343DTthis
Court7344NPCourt
looks7345VVZlook
to7346TOto
what7347WPwhat
does7348VVZdo
that7349DTthat
mean7350NNmean
.7351SENT.
Is7352VBZbe
someone7353NNsomeone
potentially7354RBpotentially
responsible7355JJresponsible
if7356INif
they7357PPthey
face7358VVPface
no7359DTno
prospect7360NNprospect
of7361INof
liability7362NNliability
?7363SENT?
No7364UHNo
,7365,,
they7366PPthey
're7367VBPbe
not7368RBnot
potentially7369RBpotentially
responsible7370JJresponsible
.7371SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]7372LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I7373PPI
...7374:...
I7375PPI
...7376:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]7377LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
It7378PPit
's7379VHZhave
been7380VBNbe
said7381VVNsay
they7382PPthey
are7383VBPbe
covered7384VVNcover
parties7385NNSparty
.7386SENT.
And7387CCand
who7388WPwho
is7389VBZbe
a7390DTa
covered7391JJcovered
party7392NNparty
that7393WDTthat
is7394VBZbe
not7395RBnot
a7396DTa
potentially7397RBpotentially
responsible7398JJresponsible
party7399NNparty
?7400SENT?
The7401DTthe
...7402:...
the7403DTthe
...7404:...
we7405PPwe
are7406VBPbe
told7407VVNtell
that7408IN/thatthat
this7409DTthis
Court7410NPCourt
has7411VHZhave
equated7412VVNequate
the7413DTthe
term7414NNterm
"7415``"
covered7416JJcovered
party7417NNparty
"7418''"
with7419INwith
personally7420RBpersonally
responsible7421JJresponsible
party7422NNparty
,7423,,
that7424IN/thatthat
a7425DTa
covered7426VVNcover
party7427NNparty
is7428VBZbe
a7429DTa
potentially7430RBpotentially
responsible7431JJresponsible
party7432NNparty
.7433SENT.
And7434CCand
you7435PPyou
say7436VVPsay
that7437WDTthat
's7438VBZbe
not7439RBnot
right7440RBright
,7441,,
they7442PPthey
're7443VBPbe
not7444RBnot
one7445CDone
and7446CCand
the7447DTthe
same7448JJsame
thing7449NNthing
.7450SENT.
So7451RBso
who7452WPwho
is7453VBZbe
a7454DTa
covered7455JJcovered
party7456NNparty
but7457CCbut
would7458MDwould
not7459RBnot
be7460VBbe
a7461DTa
potentially7462RBpotentially
responsible7463JJresponsible
party7464NNparty
?7465SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]7466LOC[MR. PALMORE]
There7467EXthere
could7468MDcould
be7469VBbe
a7470DTa
number7471NNnumber
of7472INof
ways7473NNSway
.7474SENT.
And7475CCand
you7476PPyou
're7477VBPbe
right7478RBright
,7479,,
Justice7480NPJustice
Ginsburg7481NPGinsburg
,7482,,
that7483IN/thatthat
this7484DTthis
Court7485NPCourt
has7486VHZhave
,7487,,
as7488INas
shorthand7489NNshorthand
,7490,,
used7491VVDuse
the7492DTthe
two7493CDtwo
,7494,,
linked7495VVDlink
the7496DTthe
two7497CDtwo
.7498SENT.
And7499CCand
the7500DTthe
concepts7501NNSconcept
are7502VBPbe
clearly7503RBclearly
linked7504VVNlink
.7505SENT.
All7506DTall
potentially7507RBpotentially
responsible7508JJresponsible
parties7509NNSparty
have7510VHPhave
to7511TOto
at7512INat
one7513CDone
point7514NNpoint
been7515VBNbe
covered7516VVNcover
persons7517NNSperson
.7518SENT.
But7519CCbut
a7520DTa
covered7521VVNcover
person7522NNperson
would7523MDwould
include7524VVinclude
a7525DTa
residential7526JJresidential
landowner7527NNlandowner
with7528INwith
certain7529JJcertain
exceptions7530NNSexception
.7531SENT.
Justice7532NPJustice
Sotomayor7533NPSotomayor
,7534,,
you7535PPyou
asked7536VVDask
about7537INabout
the7538DTthe
contiguous7539JJcontiguous
landowner7540NNlandowner
defense7541NNdefense
.7542SENT.
If7543INif
you7544PPyou
look7545VVPlook
at7546INat
that7547IN/thatthat
,7548,,
that7549WDTthat
is7550VBZbe
a7551DTa
carveout7552NNcarveout
from7553INfrom
the7554DTthe
definition7555NNdefinition
of7556INof
owner7557NNowner
,7558,,
so7559INso
someone7560NNsomeone
who7561WPwho
establishes7562VVZestablish
the7563DTthe
requirements7564NNSrequirement
that7565IN/thatthat
that7566DTthat
carveout7567NNcarveout
is7568VBZbe
not7569RBnot
even7570RBeven
an7571DTan
owner7572NNowner
,7573,,
so7574RBso
,7575,,
under7576INunder
ARCO7577NPARCO
's7578POS's
view7579NNview
,7580,,
where7581WRBwhere
all7582DTall
owners7583NNSowner
under7584INunder
Section7585NPSection
1077586CD@card@
are7587VBPbe
potentially7588RBpotentially
responsible7589JJresponsible
parties7590NNSparty
,7591,,
those7592DTthose
who7593WPwho
satisfy7594VVPsatisfy
that7595IN/thatthat
defense7596NNdefense
and7597CCand
the7598DTthe
bona7599NNbona
fide7600NNfide
purchaser7601NNpurchaser
defense7602NNdefense
are7603VBPbe
n't7604RBn't
even7605RBeven
owners7606NNSowner
.7607SENT.
But7608CCbut
,7609,,
more7610RBRmore
importantly7611RBimportantly
,7612,,
Congress7613NPCongress
could7614MDcould
have7615VHhave
said7616VVNsay
in7617INin
1227618CD@card@
(7619((
e7620LSe
)7621))
(7622((
67623CD6
)7624))
all7625DTall
1077626CD@card@
covered7627JJcovered
parties7628NNSparty
have7629VHPhave
to7630TOto
get7631VVget
EPA7632NPEPA
permission7633NNpermission
in7634INin
order7635NNorder
to7636TOto
remove7637VVremove
toxic7638JJtoxic
waste7639NNwaste
for7640INfor
...7641:...
or7642CCor
arsenic7643NNarsenic
from7644INfrom
their7645PP$their
land7646NNland
.7647SENT.
It7648PPit
did7649VVDdo
n't7650RBn't
say7651VVsay
that7652DTthat
.7653SENT.
It7654PPit
said7655VVDsay
potentially7656RBpotentially
responsible7657JJresponsible
parties7658NNSparty
.7659SENT.
It7660PPit
used7661VVDuse
a7662DTa
different7663JJdifferent
term7664NNterm
.7665SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7666LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well7667UHwell
,7668,,
it7669PPit
did7670VVDdo
...7671:...
it7672PPit
did7673VVDdo
,7674,,
Mr7675NPMr
.7676SENT.
Palmore7677NPPalmore
,7678,,
but7679CCbut
,7680,,
under7681INunder
your7682PP$your
theory7683NNtheory
,7684,,
how7685WRBhow
would7686MDwould
you7687PPyou
decide7688VVdecide
whether7689INwhether
somebody7690NNsomebody
is7691VBZbe
a7692DTa
potentially7693RBpotentially
responsible7694JJresponsible
party7695NNparty
?7696SENT?
It7697PPit
sounds7698VVZsound
like7699INlike
you7700PPyou
would7701MDwould
need7702VVneed
a7703DTa
court7704NNcourt
adjudication7705NNadjudication
to7706TOto
do7707VVdo
that7708DTthat
.7709SENT.
And7710CCand
that7711WDTthat
seems7712VVZseem
unlikely7713JJunlikely
that7714IN/thatthat
Congress7715NPCongress
meant7716VVDmean
for7717INfor
that7718IN/thatthat
to7719TOto
happen7720VVhappen
.7721SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]7722LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Well7723UHWell
,7724,,
Your7725PP$your
Honor7726NPHonor
,7727,,
I7728PPI
do7729VVPdo
n't7730RBn't
think7731VVthink
it7732PPit
would7733MDwould
necessarily7734RBnecessarily
need7735VVneed
a7736DTa
court7737NNcourt
adjudication7738NNadjudication
.7739SENT.
And7740CCand
,7741,,
in7742INin
fact7743NNfact
,7744,,
the7745DTthe
statute7746NNstatute
puts7747VVZput
the7748DTthe
onus7749NNonus
on7750INon
EPA7751NPEPA
.7752SENT.
This7753DTthis
is7754VBZbe
Section7755NNsection
1137756CD@card@
(7757((
k7758NNk
)7759))
(7760((
27761LS2
)7762))
(7763((
D7764NPD
)7765))
to7766TOto
notify7767VVnotify
,7768,,
identify7769VVidentify
and7770CCand
notify7771VVnotify
all7772DTall
potentially7773RBpotentially
responsible7774JJresponsible
parties7775NNSparty
as7776INas
early7777JJearly
as7778INas
it7779PPit
can7780MDcan
before7781INbefore
taking7782VVGtake
any7783DTany
removal7784NNremoval
action7785NNaction
.7786SENT.
So7787RBso
,7788,,
here7789RBhere
,7790,,
we7791PPwe
're7792VBPbe
talking7793VVGtalk
about7794RBabout
in7795INin
the7796DTthe
1980s7797NNS1980s
.7798SENT.
It7799PPit
's7800VBZbe
on7801INon
them7802PPthem
to7803TOto
identify7804VVidentify
potentially7805RBpotentially
responsible7806JJresponsible
parties7807NNSparty
and7808CCand
send7809VVsend
them7810PPthem
a7811DTa
letter7812NNletter
.7813SENT.
And7814CCand
when7815WRBwhen
there7816EXthere
's7817VBZbe
settlement7818NNsettlement
negotiations7819NNSnegotiation
and7820CCand
you7821PPyou
referred7822VVDrefer
to7823TOto
this7824DTthis
in7825INin
Section7826NPSection
1227827CD@card@
,7828,,
they7829PPthey
have7830VHPhave
to7831TOto
identify7832VVidentify
all7833DTall
potentially7834RBpotentially
responsible7835JJresponsible
parties7836NNSparty
and7837CCand
include7838VVinclude
them7839PPthem
.7840SENT.
They7841PPthey
never7842RBnever
...7843:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7844LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So7845INso
you7846PPyou
're7847VBPbe
saying7848VVGsay
that7849IN/thatthat
even7850RBeven
in7851INin
the7852DTthe
absence7853NNabsence
of7854INof
the7855DTthe
statute7856NNstatute
of7857INof
limitations7858NNSlimitation
issue7859NNissue
,7860,,
these7861DTthese
would7862MDwould
not7863RBnot
be7864VBbe
potentially7865RBpotentially
responsible7866JJresponsible
parties7867NNSparty
because7868INbecause
the7869DTthe
government7870NNgovernment
is7871VBZbe
subject7872JJsubject
to7873TOto
a7874DTa
kind7875NNkind
of7876INof
estoppel7877NNestoppel
principle7878NNprinciple
?7879SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]7880LOC[MR. PALMORE]
I7881PPI
'm7882VBPbe
saying7883VVGsay
that7884IN/thatthat
if7885INif
there7886EXthere
is7887VBZbe
some7888DTsome
concern7889NNconcern
about7890RBabout
how7891WRBhow
will7892MDwill
we7893PPwe
know7894VVknow
who7895WPwho
a7896DTa
potentially7897RBpotentially
responsible7898JJresponsible
party7899NNparty
is7900VBZbe
,7901,,
the7902DTthe
government7903NNgovernment
has7904VHZhave
tools7905NNStool
to7906TOto
at7907INat
least7908JJSleast
put7909VVput
people7910NNSpeople
on7911INon
notice7912NNnotice
that7913IN/thatthat
it7914PPit
thinks7915VVZthink
they7916PPthey
are7917VBPbe
potentially7918RBpotentially
responsible7919JJresponsible
parties7920NNSparty
.7921SENT.
Now7922RBnow
,7923,,
of7924INof
course7925NNcourse
,7926,,
it7927PPit
might7928MDmight
be7929VBbe
wrong7930JJwrong
.7931SENT.
But7932CCbut
,7933,,
in7934RBin
...7935:...
in7936INin
this7937DTthis
case7938NNcase
,7939,,
though7940RBthough
,7941,,
we7942PPwe
never7943RBnever
got7944VVDget
any7945DTany
of7946INof
those7947DTthose
kinds7948NNSkind
of7949INof
notices7950NNSnotice
.7951SENT.
In7952INin
the7953DTthe
district7954NNdistrict
court7955NNcourt
in7956INin
this7957DTthis
case7958NNcase
,7959,,
the7960DTthe
government7961NNgovernment
's7962POS's
brief7963NNbrief
said7964VVDsay
we7965PPwe
take7966VVtake
no7967DTno
position7968NNposition
on7969INon
whether7970INwhether
these7971DTthese
landowners7972NNSlandowner
are7973VBPbe
potentially7974RBpotentially
responsible7975JJresponsible
parties7976NNSparty
.7977SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]7978LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
They7979PPthey
are7980VBPbe
...7981:...
they7982PPthey
...7983:...
they7984PPthey
own7985VVPown
land7986NNland
that7987WDTthat
contains7988VVZcontain
hazardous7989JJhazardous
substances7990NNSsubstance
.7991SENT.
I7992PPI
thought7993VVDthink
that7994IN/thatthat
potentially7995RBpotentially
responsible7996JJresponsible
parties7997NNSparty
are7998VBPbe
people7999NNSpeople
who8000WPwho
own8001VVPown
land8002NNland
,8003,,
whether8004INwhether
they8005PPthey
have8006VHPhave
any8007DTany
fault8008NNfault
or8009CCor
not8010RBnot
,8011,,
but8012CCbut
their8013PP$their
land8014NNland
does8015VVZdo
contain8016VVcontain
hazardous8017JJhazardous
substances8018NNSsubstance
.8019SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]8020LOC[MR. PALMORE]
It8021PPit
does8022VVZdo
,8023,,
Justice8024NPJustice
Ginsburg8025NPGinsburg
.8026SENT.
And8027CCand
that8028DTthat
makes8029VVZmake
them8030PPthem
owners8031NNSowner
under8032INunder
Section8033NPSection
1078034CD@card@
,8035,,
unless8036INunless
they8037PPthey
are8038VBPbe
carved8039VVNcarve
out8040RPout
from8041INfrom
that8042DTthat
definition8043NNdefinition
by8044INby
one8045CDone
of8046INof
the8047DTthe
defenses8048NNSdefense
that8049IN/thatthat
we8050PPwe
were8051VBDbe
talking8052VVGtalk
about8053RBabout
.8054SENT.
That8055DTthat
makes8056VVZmake
them8057PPthem
owners8058NNSowner
,8059,,
but8060CCbut
does8061VVZdo
not8062RBnot
use8063VVuse
the8064DTthe
phrase8065NNphrase
"8066``"
potentially8067RBpotentially
responsible8068JJresponsible
party8069NNparty
.8070SENT.
"8071``"
And8072CCand
I8073PPI
think8074VVPthink
there8075EXthere
's8076VBZbe
a8077DTa
...8078:...
there8079EXthere
's8080VBZbe
a8081DTa
critical8082JJcritical
kind8083NNkind
of8084INof
elephants8085NNSelephant
in8086INin
a8087DTa
mouse8088NNmouse
hole8089NNhole
aspect8090NNaspect
to8091TOto
this8092DTthis
argument8093NNargument
.8094SENT.
Section8095NNsection
1228096CD@card@
...8097:...
and8098CCand
we8099PPwe
reproduce8100VVPreproduce
all8101DTall
of8102INof
it8103PPit
in8104INin
the8105DTthe
appendix8106NNappendix
to8107TOto
our8108PP$our
brief8109NNbrief
at8110INat
50a8111NP50a
through8112INthrough
80a8113NP80a
...8114:...
is8115VBZbe
all8116RBall
about8117INabout
settlement8118NNsettlement
.8119SENT.
If8120INif
you8121PPyou
read8122VVPread
it8123PPit
front8124JJfront
to8125TOto
back8126VVback
,8127,,
it8128PPit
's8129VBZbe
all8130RBall
about8131INabout
settlement8132NNsettlement
.8133SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]8134LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
I8135PPI
understood8136VVDunderstand
...8137:...
[MR. PALMORE]8138LOC[MR. PALMORE]
And8139CCand
if8140INif
that8141DTthat
...8142:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]8143LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...8144:...
Ms8145NNMs
.8146SENT.
Blatt8147NPBlatt
,8148,,
as8149INas
I8150PPI
...8151:...
because8152INbecause
I8153PPI
made8154VVDmake
that8155DTthat
point8156NNpoint
to8157TOto
her8158PPher
,8159,,
and8160CCand
I8161PPI
thought8162VVDthink
that8163IN/thatthat
she8164PPshe
said8165VVDsay
to8166TOto
me8167PPme
that8168IN/thatthat
there8169EXthere
are8170VBPbe
other8171JJother
places8172NNSplace
in8173INin
the8174DTthe
statute8175NNstatute
which8176WDTwhich
use8177VVPuse
the8178DTthe
term8179NNterm
"8180``"
potentially8181RBpotentially
responsible8182JJresponsible
parties8183NNSparty
,8184,,
"8185``"
so8186RBso
that8187IN/thatthat
it8188PPit
's8189VBZbe
not8190RBnot
all8191RBall
about8192INabout
settlement8193NNsettlement
.8194SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]8195LOC[MR. PALMORE]
There8196EXthere
are8197VBPbe
a8198DTa
few8199JJfew
others8200NNSother
,8201,,
most8202JJSmost
of8203INof
them8204PPthem
refer8205VVPrefer
back8206RBback
to8207TOto
the8208DTthe
settlement8209NNsettlement
provision8210NNprovision
,8211,,
but8212CCbut
I8213PPI
think8214VVPthink
that8215WDTthat
explains8216VVZexplain
the8217DTthe
purpose8218NNpurpose
of8219INof
1228220CD@card@
(8221((
e8222LSe
)8223))
(8224((
68225CD6
)8226))
and8227CCand
also8228RBalso
explains8229VVZexplain
why8230WRBwhy
it8231PPit
should8232MDshould
be8233VBbe
read8234VVNread
according8235VVGaccord
to8236TOto
its8237PP$its
ordinary8238JJordinary
plain8239JJplain
terms8240NNSterm
,8241,,
which8242WDTwhich
"8243``"
potentially8244RBpotentially
responsible8245JJresponsible
"8246''"
means8247VVZmean
...8248:...
"8249``"
potentially8250RBpotentially
responsible8251JJresponsible
"8252''"
means8253NNSmean
like8254INlike
someone8255NNsomeone
who8256WPwho
could8257MDcould
be8258VBbe
liable8259JJliable
,8260,,
which8261WDTwhich
is8262VBZbe
that8263IN/thatthat
when8264WRBwhen
there8265EXthere
are8266VBPbe
settlement8267NNsettlement
negotiations8268NNSnegotiation
and8269CCand
EPA8270NPEPA
has8271VHZhave
notified8272VVNnotify
all8273PDTall
the8274DTthe
PRPs8275NNSPRPs
of8276INof
the8277DTthe
settlement8278NNsettlement
negotiations8279NNSnegotiation
and8280CCand
included8281VVDinclude
them8282PPthem
...8283:...
something8284NNsomething
they8285PPthey
've8286VHPhave
never8287RBnever
done8288VVNdo
here8289RBhere
,8290,,
we8291PPwe
've8292VHPhave
been8293VBNbe
excluded8294VVNexclude
...8295:...
then8296RBthen
they8297PPthey
do8298VVPdo
n't8299RBn't
want8300VVwant
these8301DTthese
...8302:...
these8303DTthese
parties8304NNSparty
who8305WPwho
face8306VVPface
possible8307JJpossible
liability8308NNliability
and8309CCand
,8310,,
therefore8311RBtherefore
,8312,,
are8313VBPbe
in8314INin
settlement8315NNsettlement
negotiations8316NNSnegotiation
to8317TOto
go8318VVgo
off8319RPoff
and8320CCand
do8321VVdo
their8322PP$their
own8323JJown
remedial8324JJremedial
plan8325NNplan
.8326SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]8327LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But8328CCbut
you8329PPyou
think8330VVPthink
a8331DTa
party8332NNparty
could8333MDcould
be8334VBbe
potentially8335RBpotentially
responsible8336JJresponsible
at8337INat
one8338CDone
point8339NNpoint
but8340CCbut
then8341RBthen
at8342INat
a8343DTa
later8344JJRlate
point8345NNpoint
cease8346VVPcease
to8347TOto
be8348VBbe
potentially8349RBpotentially
responsible8350JJresponsible
?8351SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]8352LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Absolutely8353RBabsolutely
,8354,,
Your8355PP$your
Honor8356NPHonor
,8357,,
I8358PPI
do8359VVPdo
think8360VVthink
that8361DTthat
.8362SENT.
That's8363NNSThat's
...8364:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]8365LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
And8366CCand
what8367WPwhat
sense8368NNsense
...8369:...
[MR. PALMORE]8370LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...8371:...
that8372WDTthat
's8373VBZbe
inherent8374JJinherent
in8375INin
the8376DTthe
...8377:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]8378LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
...8379:...
would8380MDwould
...8381:...
what8382WPwhat
sense8383NNsense
would8384MDwould
that8385RBthat
make8386VVmake
with8387INwith
respect8388NNrespect
to8389TOto
a8390DTa
rule8391NNrule
limiting8392VVGlimit
the8393DTthe
ability8394NNability
of8395INof
that8396DTthat
party8397NNparty
to8398TOto
engage8399VVengage
in8400INin
remediation8401NNremediation
?8402SENT?
It8403PPit
's8404VBZbe
not8405RBnot
consistent8406JJconsistent
with8407INwith
the8408DTthe
EPA8409NPEPA
plan8410NNplan
.8411SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]8412LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Because8413INbecause
,8414,,
Your8415PP$your
Honor8416NPHonor
,8417,,
first8418JJfirst
of8419INof
all8420DTall
,8421,,
that8422WDTthat
's8423VBZbe
the8424DTthe
way8425NNway
statute8426NNstatute
of8427INof
limitations8428NNSlimitation
work8429VVPwork
.8430SENT.
Right8431RBright
?8432SENT?
Parties8433NNSparty
get8434VVPget
repose8435VVrepose
when8436WRBwhen
the8437DTthe
statute8438NNstatute
has8439VHZhave
passed8440VVNpass
.8441SENT.
And8442CCand
I8443PPI
think8444VVPthink
you8445PPyou
have8446VHPhave
to8447TOto
understand8448VVunderstand
the8449DTthe
implications8450NNSimplication
of8451INof
the8452DTthe
contrary8453JJcontrary
position8454NNposition
,8455,,
which8456WDTwhich
is8457VBZbe
...8458:...
you8459PPyou
asked8460VVDask
...8461:...
someone8462NNsomeone
asked8463VVDask
the8464DTthe
question8465NNquestion
,8466,,
when8467WRBwhen
will8468MDwill
this8469DTthis
plan8470NNplan
be8471VBbe
over8472RPover
?8473SENT?
It8474PPit
's8475VBZbe
already8476RBalready
over8477RBover
on8478INon
our8479PP$our
land8480NNland
.8481SENT.
The8482DTthe
plan8483NNplan
overall8484RBoverall
is8485VBZbe
targeted8486VVNtarget
to8487TOto
be8488VBbe
completed8489VVNcomplete
in8490INin
20258491CD@card@
.8492SENT.
But8493CCbut
it8494PPit
's8495VBZbe
never8496RBnever
over8497RBover
because8498INbecause
all8499DTall
of8500INof
the8501DTthe
arsenic8502NNarsenic
and8503CCand
other8504JJother
contaminants8505NNScontaminant
will8506MDwill
not8507RBnot
be8508VBbe
removed8509VVNremove
.8510SENT.
There8511EXthere
is8512VBZbe
a8513DTa
five-year8514JJfive-year
review8515NNreview
process8516NNprocess
where8517WRBwhere
more8518JJRmore
remedial8519JJremedial
action8520NNaction
could8521MDcould
be8522VBbe
taken8523VVNtake
.8524SENT.
ARCO8525NPARCO
could8526MDcould
be8527VBbe
required8528VVNrequire
to8529TOto
do8530VVdo
it8531PPit
.8532SENT.
And8533CCand
that8534WDTthat
will8535MDwill
go8536VVgo
on8537INon
literally8538RBliterally
forever8539RBforever
.8540SENT.
So8541INso
the8542DTthe
argument8543NNargument
on8544INon
the8545DTthe
other8546JJother
side8547NNside
is8548VBZbe
that8549IN/thatthat
EPA8550NPEPA
has8551VHZhave
a8552DTa
permanent8553JJpermanent
easement8554NNeasement
on8555INon
my8556PP$my
client8557NNclient
's8558POS's
property8559NNproperty
requiring8560VVGrequire
them8561PPthem
to8562TOto
store8563VVstore
ARCO8564NPARCO
's8565POS's
arsenic8566NNarsenic
and8567CCand
lead8568VVlead
forever8569RBforever
unless8570INunless
we8571PPwe
get8572VVPget
EPA8573NPEPA
permission8574NNpermission
to8575TOto
remove8576VVremove
it8577PPit
.8578SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8579LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Can8580MDcan
I8581PPI
go8582VVgo
back8583RBback
to8584TOto
Justice8585NPJustice
Kagan8586NPKagan
's8587POS's
question8588NNquestion
for8589INfor
a8590DTa
second8591NNsecond
?8592SENT?
If8593INif
EPA8594NPEPA
notified8595VVDnotify
landowners8596NNSlandowner
early8597RBearly
on8598INon
that8599IN/thatthat
they8600PPthey
were8601VBDbe
all8602DTall
PRPs8603NNSPRPs
,8604,,
and8605CCand
you8606PPyou
disagreed8607VVDdisagree
,8608,,
how8609WRBhow
would8610MDwould
that8611RBthat
be8612VBbe
resolved8613VVNresolve
?8614SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]8615LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Well8616UHwell
,8617,,
I8618PPI
think8619VVPthink
we8620PPwe
...8621:...
we8622PPwe
would8623MDwould
then8624RBthen
...8625:...
I8626PPI
think8627VVPthink
it8628PPit
kind8629NNkind
of8630INof
depends8631VVZdepend
on8632INon
how8633WRBhow
it8634PPit
comes8635VVZcome
up8636RPup
here8637RBhere
.8638SENT.
This8639DTthis
PRP8640NPPRP
issue8641NNissue
is8642VBZbe
coming8643VVGcome
up8644RPup
in8645INin
an8646DTan
odd8647JJodd
posture8648NNposture
in8649INin
this8650DTthis
case8651NNcase
because8652INbecause
I8653PPI
think8654VVPthink
it8655PPit
's8656VBZbe
critical8657JJcritical
to8658TOto
point8659VVpoint
out8660RPout
that8661IN/thatthat
what8662WPwhat
we8663PPwe
're8664VBPbe
talking8665VVGtalk
about8666RBabout
here8667RBhere
is8668VBZbe
,8669,,
one8670CDone
,8671,,
a8672DTa
measure8673NNmeasure
of8674INof
damages8675NNSdamage
.8676SENT.
Right8677RBright
?8678SENT?
These8679DTthese
are8680VBPbe
trespass8681NNtrespass
and8682CCand
nuisance8683JJnuisance
claims8684NNSclaim
.8685SENT.
And8686CCand
under8687INunder
Montana8688NPMontana
law8689NNlaw
,8690,,
we8691PPwe
have8692VHPhave
...8693:...
the8694DTthe
default8695NNdefault
is8696VBZbe
diminution8697NNdiminution
of8698INof
value8699NNvalue
.8700SENT.
But8701CCbut
,8702,,
if8703INif
we8704PPwe
can8705MDcan
establish8706VVestablish
that8707IN/thatthat
we8708PPwe
have8709VHPhave
personal8710JJpersonal
reasons8711NNSreason
for8712INfor
wanting8713VVGwant
to8714TOto
stay8715VVstay
on8716INon
our8717PP$our
property8718NNproperty
and8719CCand
...8720:...
and8721CCand
remove8722VVremove
the8723DTthe
arsenic8724NNarsenic
,8725,,
then8726RBthen
we8727PPwe
can8728MDcan
get8729VVget
this8730DTthis
other8731JJother
measure8732NNmeasure
of8733INof
damages8734NNSdamage
,8735,,
restoration8736NNrestoration
damages8737NNSdamage
.8738SENT.
And8739CCand
then8740RBthen
it8741PPit
comes8742VVZcome
in8743INin
,8744,,
ARCO8745NPARCO
has8746VHZhave
argued8747VVNargue
that8748IN/thatthat
as8749RBas
like8750INlike
a8751DTa
defense8752NNdefense
to8753TOto
...8754:...
to8755TOto
that8756DTthat
.8757SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8758LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I8759PPI
think8760VVPthink
her8761PP$her
question8762NNquestion
went8763VVDgo
to8764TOto
it8765PPit
would8766MDwould
be8767VBbe
odd8768JJodd
to8769TOto
think8770VVthink
that8771IN/thatthat
the8772DTthe
statute8773NNstatute
creates8774VVZcreate
uncertainty8775NNuncertainty
about8776INabout
who8777WPwho
is8778VBZbe
subject8779NNsubject
...8780:...
who8781WPwho
is8782VBZbe
a8783DTa
PRP8784NPPRP
and8785CCand
who8786WPwho
is8787VBZbe
n't8788RBn't
,8789,,
given8790VVNgive
who8791WPwho
needs8792VVZneed
to8793TOto
get8794VVget
approval8795NNapproval
from8796INfrom
EPA8797NPEPA
to8798TOto
do8799VVdo
improvements8800NNSimprovement
on8801INon
the8802DTthe
land8803NNland
.8804SENT.
You8805PPyou
would8806MDwould
want8807VVwant
certainty8808NNcertainty
at8809INat
the8810DTthe
front8811JJfront
end8812NNend
.8813SENT.
And8814CCand
if8815INif
you8816PPyou
can8817MDcan
disagree8818VVdisagree
and8819CCand
she8820PPshe
said8821VVDsay
go8822VVgo
to8823TOto
court8824NNcourt
,8825,,
that8826WDTthat
seems8827VVZseem
unusual8828JJunusual
for8829INfor
this8830DTthis
statutory8831JJstatutory
structure8832NNstructure
.8833SENT.
Do8834VVPdo
you8835PPyou
want8836VVPwant
to8837TOto
respond8838VVrespond
to8839TOto
that8840DTthat
?8841SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]8842LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Well8843UHWell
,8844,,
Your8845PP$your
Honor8846NPHonor
,8847,,
of8848INof
course8849NNcourse
,8850,,
EPA8851NPEPA
has8852VHZhave
the8853DTthe
ability8854NNability
to8855TOto
provide8856VVprovide
some8857DTsome
measure8858NNmeasure
of8859INof
certainty8860NNcertainty
.8861SENT.
At8862INat
least8863JJSleast
it8864PPit
can8865MDcan
put8866VVput
people8867NNSpeople
on8868INon
notice8869NNnotice
that8870IN/thatthat
it8871PPit
believes8872VVZbelieve
they8873PPthey
are8874VBPbe
PRPs8875NNSPRPs
.8876SENT.
It8877PPit
's8878VBZbe
actually8879RBactually
obligated8880VVNobligate
to8881TOto
do8882VVdo
that8883IN/thatthat
under8884INunder
the8885DTthe
statute8886NNstatute
.8887SENT.
And8888CCand
it8889PPit
did8890VVDdo
n't8891RBn't
do8892VVdo
that8893IN/thatthat
here8894RBhere
.8895SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8896LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Right8897RBright
.8898SENT.
But8899CCbut
even8900RBeven
if8901INif
they8902PPthey
do8903VVPdo
,8904,,
there8905EXthere
's8906VBZbe
disagreement8907NNdisagreement
,8908,,
that8909WDTthat
would8910MDwould
have8911VHhave
to8912TOto
be8913VBbe
resolved8914VVNresolve
somehow8915RBsomehow
with8916INwith
satellite8917JJsatellite
collateral8918NNcollateral
litigation8919NNlitigation
,8920,,
I8921PPI
think8922VVPthink
,8923,,
or8924CCor
else8925RBelse
we8926PPwe
'd8927MDwould
be8928VBbe
back8929RBback
in8930INin
the8931DTthe
same8932JJsame
spot8933NNspot
decades8934NNSdecade
later8935RBRlater
.8936SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]8937LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Perhaps8938RBperhaps
,8939,,
Your8940PP$your
Honor8941NPHonor
.8942SENT.
But8943CCbut
I8944PPI
think8945VVPthink
that8946IN/thatthat
the8947DTthe
assumption8948NNassumption
behind8949INbehind
those8950DTthose
kinds8951NNSkind
of8952INof
questions8953NNSquestion
is8954VBZbe
that8955IN/thatthat
EPA8956NPEPA
critically8957RBcritically
needs8958VVZneed
1228959CD@card@
(8960((
e8961LSe
)8962))
(8963((
68964CD6
)8965))
in8966INin
order8967NNorder
to8968TOto
effectuate8969VVeffectuate
its8970PP$its
goals8971NNSgoal
...8972:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]8973LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Would8974MDwould
...8975:...
would8976MDwould
you8977PPyou
...8978:...
[MR. PALMORE]8979LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...8980:...
on8981INon
a8982DTa
CERCLA8983NPCERCLA
run8984NNrun
...8985:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]8986LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...8987:...
think8988VVPthink
it8989PPit
would8990MDwould
be8991VBbe
a8992DTa
...8993:...
[MR. PALMORE]8994LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...8995:...
site8996NNsite
,8997,,
and8998CCand
that8999DTthat
's9000VBZbe
not9001RBnot
correct9002JJcorrect
.9003SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]9004LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...9005:...
would9006MDwould
you9007PPyou
think9008VVPthink
it9009PPit
would9010MDwould
be9011VBbe
an9012DTan
appropriate9013JJappropriate
rule9014NNrule
if9015INif
basically9016RBbasically
it9017PPit
were9018VBDbe
up9019RPup
to9020TOto
EPA9021NPEPA
to9022TOto
designate9023VVdesignate
potentially9024RBpotentially
responsible9025JJresponsible
parties9026NNSparty
or9027CCor
at9028INat
least9029JJSleast
that9030IN/thatthat
there9031EXthere
were9032VBDbe
a9033DTa
strong9034JJstrong
presumption9035NNpresumption
that9036IN/thatthat
,9037,,
if9038INif
EPA9039NPEPA
designated9040VVNdesignate
somebody9041NNsomebody
as9042INas
a9043DTa
potentially9044RBpotentially
responsible9045JJresponsible
party9046NNparty
,9047,,
they9048PPthey
were9049VBDbe
one9050CDone
?9051SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]9052LOC[MR. PALMORE]
I9053PPI
...9054:...
I9055PPI
...9056:...
I9057PPI
do9058VVPdo
n't9059RBn't
...9060:...
they9061PPthey
certainly9062RBcertainly
do9063VVPdo
n't9064RBn't
have9065VHhave
the9066DTthe
...9067:...
the9068DTthe
power9069NNpower
to9070TOto
do9071VVdo
it9072PPit
unquestionably9073RBunquestionably
,9074,,
because9075INbecause
it9076PPit
's9077VBZbe
...9078:...
it9079PPit
's9080VBZbe
a9081DTa
defined9082VVNdefine
term9083NNterm
under9084INunder
the9085DTthe
statute9086NNstatute
.9087SENT.
So9088RBso
they9089PPthey
did9090VVDdo
send9091VVsend
us9092PPus
such9093JJsuch
a9094DTa
letter9095NNletter
as9096INas
a9097DTa
litigation9098NNlitigation
filing9099NNfiling
,9100,,
as9101INas
a9102DTa
letter9103NNletter
to9104TOto
counsel9105NNcounsel
,9106,,
right9107RBright
before9108INbefore
the9109DTthe
cert9110NNcert
petition9111NNpetition
in9112INin
this9113DTthis
case9114NNcase
was9115VBDbe
filed9116VVNfile
.9117SENT.
And9118CCand
so9119RBso
I9120PPI
do9121VVPdo
n't9122RBn't
think9123VVthink
that9124DTthat
...9125:...
that9126WDTthat
's9127VBZbe
not9128RBnot
binding9129VVGbind
because9130INbecause
they9131PPthey
're9132VBPbe
wrong9133JJwrong
.9134SENT.
We9135PPwe
're9136VBPbe
not9137RBnot
potentially9138RBpotentially
responsible9139JJresponsible
parties9140NNSparty
.9141SENT.
And9142CCand
it9143PPit
also9144RBalso
came9145VVDcome
decades9146NNSdecade
after9147INafter
they9148PPthey
were9149VBDbe
supposed9150VVNsuppose
to9151TOto
do9152VVdo
that9153DTthat
.9154SENT.
And9155CCand
they9156PPthey
've9157VHPhave
never9158RBnever
treated9159VVNtreat
us9160PPus
as9161INas
potentially9162RBpotentially
responsible9163JJresponsible
parties9164NNSparty
.9165SENT.
But9166CCbut
at9167INat
least9168JJSleast
that9169DTthat
would9170MDwould
define9171VVdefine
a9172DTa
universe9173NNuniverse
,9174,,
if9175INif
done9176VVNdo
properly9177RBproperly
,9178,,
according9179VVGaccord
to9180TOto
the9181DTthe
statute9182NNstatute
...9183:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]9184LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Yeah9185NPYeah
,9186,,
I9187PPI
...9188:...
[MR. PALMORE]9189LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...9190:...
of9191INof
people9192NNSpeople
...9193:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]9194LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...9195:...
actually9196RBactually
...9197:...
you9198PPyou
're9199VBPbe
quite9200RBquite
right9201JJright
.9202SENT.
I9203PPI
was9204VBDbe
not9205RBnot
clear9206JJclear
enough9207RBenough
in9208INin
my9209PP$my
question9210NNquestion
.9211SENT.
I9212PPI
actually9213RBactually
meant9214VVDmean
as9215RBas
...9216:...
that9217IN/thatthat
they9218PPthey
would9219MDwould
designate9220VVdesignate
somebody9221NNsomebody
as9222INas
part9223NNpart
of9224INof
putting9225VVGput
together9226RBtogether
the9227DTthe
settlement9228NNsettlement
negotiations9229NNSnegotiation
that9230IN/thatthat
1369231CD@card@
is9232VBZbe
all9233RBall
about9234RBabout
.9235SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]9236LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Absolutely9237RBabsolutely
.9238SENT.
That9239DTthat
would9240MDwould
at9241INat
least9242JJSleast
allow9243VVallow
them9244PPthem
to9245TOto
identify9246VVidentify
the9247DTthe
universe9248NNuniverse
and9249CCand
put9250VVput
people9251NNSpeople
on9252INon
notice9253NNnotice
that9254IN/thatthat
EPA9255NPEPA
...9256:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9257LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
The9258DTthe
problem9259NNproblem
,9260,,
knowing9261VVGknow
your9262PP$your
land9263NNland
...9264:...
your9265PP$your
clients9266NNSclient
are9267VBPbe
landowners9268NNSlandowner
of9269INof
land9270NNland
that9271WDTthat
is9272VBZbe
polluted9273JJpolluted
,9274,,
and9275CCand
it9276PPit
's9277VBZbe
a9278DTa
Superfund9279NPSuperfund
site9280NNsite
.9281SENT.
Now9282RBnow
they9283PPthey
know9284VVPknow
that9285RBthat
.9286SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]9287LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Yes9288NPYes
.9289SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9290LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
You9291PPyou
're9292VBPbe
a9293DTa
good9294JJgood
lawyer9295NNlawyer
.9296SENT.
I9297PPI
would9298MDwould
n't9299RBn't
think9300VVthink
there9301EXthere
was9302VBDbe
actually9303RBactually
a9304DTa
problem9305NNproblem
of9306INof
their9307PP$their
being9308VBGbe
ignorant9309JJignorant
.9310SENT.
Maybe9311RBmaybe
there9312EXthere
is9313VBZbe
.9314SENT.
I9315PPI
do9316VVPdo
n't9317RBn't
know9318VVknow
what9319WPwhat
it9320PPit
is9321VBZbe
.9322SENT.
I9323PPI
have9324VHPhave
n't9325RBn't
seen9326VVNsee
it9327PPit
.9328SENT.
So9329RBso
does9330VVZdo
it9331PPit
boil9332VVboil
down9333RPdown
to9334TOto
...9335:...
and9336CCand
you9337PPyou
said9338VVDsay
this9339DTthis
,9340,,
but9341CCbut
I9342PPI
do9343VVPdo
n't9344RBn't
think9345VVthink
you9346PPyou
're9347VBPbe
right9348RBright
...9349:...
that9350DTthat
...9351:...
that9352IN/thatthat
,9353,,
on9354INon
the9355DTthe
one9356CDone
hand9357NNhand
,9358,,
you9359PPyou
said9360VVDsay
EPA9361NPEPA
gets9362VVZget
some9363DTsome
kind9364NNkind
of9365INof
permanent9366JJpermanent
easement9367NNeasement
on9368INon
their9369PP$their
property9370NNproperty
to9371TOto
tell9372VVtell
them9373PPthem
what9374WPwhat
to9375TOto
do9376VVdo
.9377SENT.
But9378CCbut
is9379VBZbe
n't9380RBn't
that9381IN/thatthat
an9382DTan
overstatement9383NNoverstatement
?9384SENT?
What9385WPWhat
EPA9386NPEPA
can9387MDcan
do9388VVdo
is9389VBZbe
they9390PPthey
can9391MDcan
say9392VVsay
we9393PPwe
do9394VVPdo
n't9395RBn't
want9396VVwant
you9397PPyou
physically9398RBphysically
to9399TOto
change9400VVchange
this9401DTthis
land9402NNland
.9403SENT.
And9404CCand
if9405INif
you9406PPyou
think9407VVPthink
that9408IN/thatthat
they9409PPthey
are9410VBPbe
unreasonable9411JJunreasonable
,9412,,
you9413PPyou
go9414VVPgo
to9415TOto
court9416VVcourt
.9417SENT.
That9418DTthat
's9419VBZbe
their9420PP$their
side9421NNside
of9422INof
it9423PPit
.9424SENT.
And9425CCand
you9426PPyou
say9427VVPsay
they9428PPthey
're9429VBPbe
unreasonable9430JJunreasonable
.9431SENT.
Okay9432JJokay
?9433SENT?
That9434DTthat
's9435VBZbe
simple9436JJsimple
.9437SENT.
And9438CCand
most9439JJSmost
people9440NNSpeople
can9441MDcan
do9442VVdo
that9443DTthat
.9444SENT.
And9445CCand
if9446INif
you9447PPyou
win9448VVPwin
,9449,,
then9450RBthen
it9451PPit
's9452VBZbe
really9453RBreally
about9454INabout
the9455DTthe
same9456JJsame
thing9457NNthing
.9458SENT.
You9459PPyou
can9460MDcan
go9461VVgo
and9462CCand
say9463VVsay
,9464,,
look9465VVlook
,9466,,
we9467PPwe
under9468INunder
our9469PP$our
Montana9470NPMontana
statute9471NNstatute
believe9472VVPbelieve
that9473IN/thatthat
we9474PPwe
should9475MDshould
not9476RBnot
just9477RBjust
get9478VVget
money9479NNmoney
,9480,,
but9481CCbut
we9482PPwe
should9483MDshould
get9484VVget
money9485NNmoney
that9486WDTthat
is9487VBZbe
earmarked9488VVNearmark
and9489CCand
must9490MDmust
be9491VBbe
used9492VVNuse
to9493TOto
make9494VVmake
physical9495JJphysical
changes9496NNSchange
in9497INin
the9498DTthe
property9499NNproperty
.9500SENT.
That9501DTthat
's9502VBZbe
the9503DTthe
problem9504NNproblem
.9505SENT.
And9506CCand
if9507INif
you9508PPyou
can9509MDcan
do9510VVdo
that9511IN/thatthat
,9512,,
it9513PPit
may9514MDmay
be9515VBbe
easier9516JJReasy
to9517TOto
get9518VVget
.9519SENT.
But9520CCbut
the9521DTthe
problem9522NNproblem
is9523VBZbe
that9524IN/thatthat
there9525EXthere
could9526MDcould
be9527VBbe
many9528JJmany
states9529NNSstate
that9530WDTthat
have9531VHPhave
that9532DTthat
,9533,,
and9534CCand
you9535PPyou
can9536MDcan
't9537RB't
run9538VVrun
it9539PPit
in9540INin
a9541DTa
central9542JJcentral
way9543NNway
.9544SENT.
Have9545VHPhave
I9546PPI
stated9547VVNstate
correctly9548RBcorrectly
what9549WPwhat
the9550DTthe
issue9551NNissue
is9552VBZbe
?9553SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]9554LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Perhaps9555RBperhaps
,9556,,
Your9557PP$your
Honor9558NPHonor
.9559SENT.
First9560JJfirst
of9561INof
all9562DTall
,9563,,
a9564DTa
couple9565NNcouple
answers9566NNSanswer
.9567SENT.
One9568PPone
is9569VBZbe
Congress9570NPCongress
wanted9571VVDwant
to9572TOto
allow9573VVallow
state9574NNstate
law9575NNlaw
to9576TOto
...9577:...
to9578TOto
proceed9579VVproceed
...9580:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9581LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
They9582PPthey
did9583VVDdo
for9584INfor
damages9585NNSdamage
.9586SENT.
There9587EXthere
is9588VBZbe
no9589DTno
doubt9590NNdoubt
.9591SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]9592LOC[MR. PALMORE]
And9593CCand
for9594INfor
what9595WPwhat
...9596:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9597LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But9598CCbut
is9599VBZbe
there9600RBthere
...9601:...
[MR. PALMORE]9602LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...9603:...
and9604CCand
...9605:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9606LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...9607:...
any9608DTany
indication9609NNindication
they9610PPthey
wanted9611VVDwant
physical9612JJphysical
changes9613NNSchange
to9614TOto
be9615VBbe
made9616VVNmake
by9617INby
409618CD@card@
different9619JJdifferent
entities9620NNSentity
?9621SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]9622LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Yes9623NPYes
,9624,,
Your9625PP$your
Honor9626NPHonor
.9627SENT.
If9628INif
you9629PPyou
look9630VVPlook
at9631INat
Section9632NPSection
1149633CD@card@
(9634((
b9635LSb
)9636))
,9637,,
which9638WDTwhich
is9639VBZbe
a9640DTa
no9641RBno
double9642JJdouble
recovery9643NNrecovery
provision9644NNprovision
,9645,,
Congress9646NPCongress
contemplated9647VVDcontemplate
that9648IN/thatthat
there9649EXthere
would9650MDwould
be9651VBbe
state9652NNstate
law9653NNlaw
recovery9654NNrecovery
for9655INfor
removal9656NNremoval
,9657,,
and9658CCand
the9659DTthe
only9660JJonly
limit9661NNlimit
it9662PPit
put9663VVPput
on9664INon
it9665PPit
was9666VBDbe
that9667IN/thatthat
there9668EXthere
be9669VBbe
no9670DTno
double9671JJdouble
recovery9672NNrecovery
.9673SENT.
Congress9674NPCongress
knew9675VVDknow
that9676IN/thatthat
there9677EXthere
could9678MDcould
be9679VBbe
state9680NNstate
law9681NNlaw
...9682:...
state9683NNstate
law9684NNlaw
recovery9685NNrecovery
for9686INfor
removal9687NNremoval
and9688CCand
it9689PPit
allowed9690VVDallow
it9691PPit
to9692TOto
continue9693VVcontinue
.9694SENT.
And9695CCand
also9696RBalso
I9697PPI
think9698VVPthink
that9699IN/thatthat
the9700DTthe
...9701:...
the9702DTthe
...9703:...
the9704DTthe
...9705:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9706LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But9707CCbut
what9708WPwhat
,9709,,
Mr9710NPMr
.9711SENT.
Palmore9712NPPalmore
,9713,,
of9714INof
the9715DTthe
argument9716NNargument
that9717IN/thatthat
what9718WPwhat
the9719DTthe
state9720NNstate
court9721NNcourt
might9722MDmight
order9723VVorder
conflicts9724NNSconflict
with9725INwith
what9726WPwhat
EEOC9727NPEEOC
...9728:...
that9729IN/thatthat
what9730WPwhat
the9731DTthe
EPA9732NPEPA
,9733,,
for9734INfor
...9735:...
one9736CDone
example9737NNexample
was9738VBDbe
given9739VVNgive
here9740RBhere
.9741SENT.
You9742PPyou
want9743VVPwant
more9744JJRmore
arsenic9745NNarsenic
removed9746VVDremove
.9747SENT.
EPA9748NPEPA
said9749VVDsay
that9750IN/thatthat
that9751WDTthat
would9752MDwould
involve9753VVinvolve
danger9754NNdanger
.9755SENT.
There9756EXthere
would9757MDwould
be9758VBbe
additional9759JJadditional
hazards9760NNShazard
.9761SENT.
The9762DTthe
...9763:...
the9764DTthe
problem9765NNproblem
with9766INwith
not9767RBnot
having9768VHGhave
EPA9769NPEPA
as9770INas
the9771DTthe
overall9772JJoverall
supervisor9773NNsupervisor
means9774VVZmean
that9775IN/thatthat
there9776RBthere
...9777:...
that9778IN/thatthat
there9779EXthere
can9780MDcan
be9781VBbe
clashes9782NNSclash
between9783INbetween
what9784WPwhat
state9785NNstate
law9786NNlaw
says9787VVZsay
is9788VBZbe
okay9789JJokay
and9790CCand
what9791WPwhat
EPA9792NPEPA
says9793VVZsay
should9794MDshould
be9795VBbe
the9796DTthe
proper9797JJproper
treatment9798NNtreatment
.9799SENT.
So9800RBso
...9801:...
[MR. PALMORE]9802LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Justice9803NPJustice
Ginsburg9804NPGinsburg
,9805,,
of9806INof
course9807NNcourse
,9808,,
if9809INif
EPA9810NPEPA
thinks9811VVZthink
that9812IN/thatthat
a9813DTa
remedy9814NNremedy
is9815VBZbe
going9816VVGgo
to9817TOto
cause9818VVcause
harm9819NNharm
,9820,,
as9821INas
it9822PPit
said9823VVDsay
in9824INin
its9825PP$its
invitation9826NNinvitation
,9827,,
we9828PPwe
believe9829VVPbelieve
it9830PPit
has9831VHZhave
ample9832JJample
tools9833NNStool
to9834TOto
stop9835VVstop
it9836PPit
.9837SENT.
Second9838JJsecond
of9839INof
all9840DTall
,9841,,
there9842EXthere
is9843VBZbe
simply9844RBsimply
in9845INin
this9846DTthis
case9847NNcase
...9848:...
that9849WDTthat
might9850MDmight
be9851VBbe
an9852DTan
issue9853NNissue
in9854INin
another9855DTanother
case9856NNcase
.9857SENT.
In9858INin
this9859DTthis
case9860NNcase
,9861,,
there9862EXthere
is9863VBZbe
no9864DTno
such9865JJsuch
finding9866NNfinding
in9867INin
any9868DTany
of9869INof
the9870DTthe
regulatory9871JJregulatory
documents9872NNSdocument
of9873INof
...9874:...
of9875INof
environmental9876JJenvironmental
harm9877NNharm
.9878SENT.
They9879PPthey
just9880RBjust
said9881VVDsay
we9882PPwe
're9883VBPbe
going9884VVGgo
to9885TOto
go9886VVgo
this9887DTthis
far9888RBfar
and9889CCand
no9890RBno
further9891RBRfurther
.9892SENT.
They9893PPthey
did9894VVDdo
n't9895RBn't
reject9896VVreject
any9897DTany
...9898:...
they9899PPthey
did9900VVDdo
n't9901RBn't
reject9902VVreject
our9903PP$our
permeable9904JJpermeable
wall9905NNwall
to9906TOto
clean9907VVclean
the9908DTthe
groundwater9909NNgroundwater
.9910SENT.
They9911PPthey
did9912VVDdo
n't9913RBn't
say9914VVsay
we9915PPwe
can9916MDcan
't9917RB't
do9918VVPdo
249919CD@card@
inches9920NNSinch
,9921,,
much9922RBmuch
less9923RBRless
did9924VVDdo
they9925PPthey
say9926VVPsay
that9927IN/thatthat
any9928DTany
of9929INof
those9930DTthose
things9931NNSthing
would9932MDwould
cause9933VVcause
environmental9934JJenvironmental
harm9935NNharm
.9936SENT.
So9937RBso
in9938INin
a9939DTa
...9940:...
in9941INin
...9942:...
one9943PPone
can9944MDcan
imagine9945VVimagine
...9946:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]9947LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Maybe9948RBmaybe
it9949PPit
was9950VBDbe
a9951DTa
moot9952JJmoot
question9953NNquestion
if9954INif
it9955PPit
's9956VBZbe
your9957PP$your
obligation9958NNobligation
to9959TOto
ask9960VVask
them9961PPthem
,9962,,
meaning9963VVGmean
,9964,,
if9965INif
you9966PPyou
are9967VBPbe
a9968DTa
PRP9969NPPRP
and9970CCand
that9971DTthat
's9972VBZbe
what9973WPwhat
we9974PPwe
conclude9975VVPconclude
,9976,,
it9977PPit
would9978MDwould
be9979VBbe
your9980PP$your
obligation9981NNobligation
to9982TOto
ask9983VVask
them9984PPthem
for9985INfor
permission9986NNpermission
.9987SENT.
So9988RBso
,9989,,
if9990INif
Ms9991NNMs
.9992SENT.
Blatt9993NPBlatt
is9994VBZbe
right9995JJright
that9996IN/thatthat
the9997DTthe
award9998NNaward
here9999RBhere
,10000,,
assuming10001VVGassume
you10002PPyou
were10003VBDbe
to10004TOto
get10005VVget
one10006CDone
,10007,,
were10008VBDbe
conditioned10009VVNcondition
on10010INon
you10011PPyou
being10012VBGbe
a10013DTa
PRP10014NPPRP
and10015CCand
any10016DTany
action10017NNaction
you10018PPyou
took10019VVDtake
had10020VHDhave
to10021TOto
be10022VBbe
approved10023VVNapprove
by10024INby
the10025DTthe
EPA10026NPEPA
,10027,,
what10028WPwhat
damage10029NNdamage
does10030VVZdo
this10031DTthis
do10032VVPdo
to10033TOto
you10034PPyou
?10035SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]10036LOC[MR. PALMORE]
That10037DTthat
would10038MDwould
be10039VBbe
a10040DTa
question10041NNquestion
...10042:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10043LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
You10044PPyou
...10045:...
you10046PPyou
would10047MDwould
have10048VHhave
administrative10049JJadministrative
remedies10050NNSremedy
to10051TOto
challenge10052VVchallenge
their10053PP$their
denial10054NNdenial
of10055INof
any10056DTany
activity10057NNactivity
you10058PPyou
wanted10059VVDwant
to10060TOto
take10061VVtake
.10062SENT.
That10063DTthat
would10064MDwould
be10065VBbe
litigated10066VVNlitigate
by10067INby
a10068DTa
court10069NNcourt
.10070SENT.
But10071CCbut
at10072INat
least10073JJSleast
there10074EXthere
would10075MDwould
be10076VBbe
clarity10077NNclarity
.10078SENT.
Landowners10079NNSlandowner
on10080INon
super10081JJsuper
site10082NNsite
funds10083NNSfund
,10084,,
before10085INbefore
you10086PPyou
interfere10087VVPinterfere
with10088INwith
the10089DTthe
EPA10090NPEPA
,10091,,
get10092VVPget
their10093PP$their
approval10094NNapproval
or10095CCor
before10096RBbefore
you10097PPyou
attempt10098VVattempt
to10099TOto
or10100CCor
before10101INbefore
you10102PPyou
attempt10103VVPattempt
to10104TOto
do10105VVdo
anything10106NNanything
,10107,,
get10108VVget
their10109PP$their
approval10110NNapproval
.10111SENT.
What10112WPWhat
's10113VBZbe
wrong10114JJwrong
with10115INwith
such10116PDTsuch
a10117DTa
ruling10118NNruling
?10119SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]10120LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Well10121UHWell
,10122,,
Your10123PP$your
Honor10124NPHonor
,10125,,
of10126INof
course10127NNcourse
,10128,,
our10129PP$our
position10130NNposition
is10131VBZbe
we10132PPwe
're10133VBPbe
not10134RBnot
required10135VVNrequire
to10136TOto
get10137VVget
approval10138NNapproval
because10139INbecause
we10140PPwe
're10141VBPbe
not10142RBnot
PRPs10143NNSPRPs
.10144SENT.
If10145INif
we10146PPwe
lose10147VVPlose
on10148INon
that10149DTthat
and10150CCand
if10151INif
you10152PPyou
conclude10153VVPconclude
we10154PPwe
...10155:...
we10156PPwe
also10157RBalso
are10158VBPbe
not10159RBnot
contiguous10160JJcontiguous
landowners10161NNSlandowner
,10162,,
which10163WDTwhich
carves10164VVZcarve
us10165PPus
out10166RPout
...10167:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10168LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I10169PPI
do10170VVPdo
n't10171RBn't
have10172VHhave
to10173TOto
decide10174VVdecide
that10175DTthat
.10176SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]10177LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...10178:...
of10179INof
the10180DTthe
definition10181NNdefinition
of10182INof
owner10183NNowner
...10184:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10185LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That10186DTthat
...10187:...
the10188DTthe
Court10189NPCourt
...10190:...
[MR. PALMORE]10191LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Well10192UHWell
,10193,,
their10194PP$their
argument10195NNargument
is10196VBZbe
all10197DTall
owners10198NNSowner
are10199VBPbe
PRPs10200NPPRPs
.10201SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10202LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Whether10203NPWhether
...10204:...
[MR. PALMORE]10205LOC[MR. PALMORE]
If10206INif
we10207PPwe
're10208VBPbe
not10209RBnot
owners10210NNSowner
...10211:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10212LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...10213:...
whether10214INwhether
...10215:...
[MR. PALMORE]10216LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...10217:...
we10218PPwe
're10219VBPbe
not10220RBnot
a10221DTa
PRP10222NPPRP
.10223SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10224LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...10225:...
just10226RBjust
assume10227VVassume
...10228:...
[MR. PALMORE]10229LOC[MR. PALMORE]
If10230INif
you10231PPyou
...10232:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10233LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...10234:...
that10235IN/thatthat
we10236PPwe
rule10237VVPrule
that10238IN/thatthat
you10239PPyou
're10240VBPbe
...10241:...
[MR. PALMORE]10242LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...10243:...
assume10244VVassume
away10245RPaway
all10246DTall
of10247INof
that10248WDTthat
,10249,,
then10250RBthen
it10251PPit
's10252VBZbe
really10253RBreally
a10254DTa
state10255NNstate
law10256NNlaw
question10257NNquestion
.10258SENT.
This10259DTthis
is10260VBZbe
a10261DTa
state10262NNstate
law10263NNlaw
question10264NNquestion
.10265SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10266LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
No10267NPNo
,10268,,
it10269PPit
's10270VBZbe
not10271RBnot
a10272DTa
state10273NNstate
law10274NNlaw
question10275NNquestion
.10276SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]10277LOC[MR. PALMORE]
It10278PPit
...10279:...
it10280PPit
...10281:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10282LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
We10283PPwe
would10284MDwould
hold10285VVhold
that10286IN/thatthat
it10287PPit
would10288MDwould
...10289:...
it10290PPit
would10291MDwould
conflict10292VVconflict
with10293INwith
federal10294JJfederal
law10295NNlaw
,10296,,
with10297INwith
federal10298JJfederal
rules10299NNSrule
,10300,,
if10301INif
you10302PPyou
go10303VVPgo
ahead10304RBahead
with10305INwith
that10306DTthat
...10307:...
with10308INwith
remediation10309NNremediation
without10310INwithout
EPA10311NPEPA
approval10312NNapproval
.10313SENT.
You10314PPyou
are10315VBPbe
a10316DTa
PRP10317NPPRP
.10318SENT.
And10319CCand
conflict10320NNconflict
preemption10321NNpreemption
stops10322VVZstop
you10323PPyou
from10324INfrom
taking10325VVGtake
any10326DTany
actions10327NNSaction
that10328WDTthat
are10329VBPbe
not10330RBnot
approved10331VVNapprove
by10332INby
the10333DTthe
EPA10334NPEPA
,10335,,
period10336NNperiod
,10337,,
end10338NNend
of10339INof
case10340NNcase
.10341SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]10342LOC[MR. PALMORE]
The10343DTthe
reason10344NNreason
that10345WDTthat
would10346MDwould
be10347VBbe
a10348DTa
remand10349NNremand
question10350NNquestion
,10351,,
Justice10352NPJustice
Sotomayor10353NPSotomayor
,10354,,
is10355VBZbe
because10356INbecause
we10357PPwe
have10358VHPhave
n't10359RBn't
asked10360VVNask
the10361DTthe
EPA10362NPEPA
for10363INfor
that10364DTthat
permission10365NNpermission
because10366INbecause
we've10367NNwe've
...10368:...
we10369PPwe
do10370VVPdo
n't10371RBn't
believe10372VVbelieve
we10373PPwe
are10374VBPbe
PRPs10375NNSPRPs
.10376SENT.
And10377CCand
,10378,,
in10379INin
fact10380NNfact
,10381,,
EPA10382NPEPA
itself10383PPitself
took10384VVDtake
no10385DTno
position10386NNposition
on10387INon
whether10388INwhether
we10389PPwe
are10390VBPbe
PRPs10391NNSPRPs
in10392INin
this10393DTthis
very10394JJvery
case10395NNcase
.10396SENT.
So10397RBso
we10398PPwe
might10399MDmight
be10400VBbe
able10401JJable
to10402TOto
get10403VVget
in10404INin
the10405DTthe
district10406NNdistrict
court10407NNcourt
in10408INin
Montana10409NPMontana
...10410:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10411LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I10412PPI
thought10413VVDthink
their10414PP$their
whole10415JJwhole
brief10416NNbrief
said10417VVDsay
you10418PPyou
were10419VBDbe
...10420:...
[MR. PALMORE]10421LOC[MR. PALMORE]
In10422INin
the10423DTthe
district10424NNdistrict
court10425NNcourt
in10426INin
Montana10427NPMontana
,10428,,
the10429DTthe
U10430NPU
.10431SENT.
S10432NPS
.10433SENT.
Government10434NNgovernment
said10435VVDsay
we10436PPwe
take10437VVtake
no10438DTno
position10439NNposition
on10440INon
whether10441INwhether
landowners10442NNSlandowner
here10443RBhere
are10444VBPbe
PRPs10445NNSPRPs
.10446SENT.
Their10447PP$their
position10448NNposition
has10449VHZhave
changed10450VVNchange
dramatically10451RBdramatically
over10452INover
time10453NNtime
.10454SENT.
What10455WPWhat
I10456PPI
'm10457VBPbe
saying10458VVGsay
is10459VBZbe
we10460PPwe
never10461RBnever
had10462VHDhave
any10463DTany
reason10464NNreason
to10465TOto
seek10466VVseek
their10467PP$their
permission10468NNpermission
.10469SENT.
If10470INif
you10471PPyou
were10472VBDbe
to10473TOto
hold10474VVhold
that10475IN/thatthat
we10476PPwe
need10477VVPneed
their10478PP$their
permission10479NNpermission
,10480,,
then10481RBthen
we10482PPwe
...10483:...
A10484DTa
,10485,,
we10486PPwe
might10487MDmight
get10488VVget
it10489PPit
,10490,,
they10491PPthey
've10492VHPhave
said10493VVNsay
before10494RBbefore
that10495IN/thatthat
there10496EXthere
are10497VBPbe
aspects10498NNSaspect
of10499INof
our10500PP$our
plan10501NNplan
they10502PPthey
could10503MDcould
approve10504VVapprove
;10505:;
and10506CCand
,10507,,
B10508NPB
,10509,,
to10510TOto
the10511DTthe
extent10512NNextent
that10513IN/thatthat
there10514EXthere
's10515VBZbe
uncertainty10516NNuncertainty
about10517INabout
that10518DTthat
,10519,,
that10520WDTthat
is10521VBZbe
a10522DTa
state10523NNstate
law10524NNlaw
question10525NNquestion
because10526INbecause
,10527,,
again10528RBagain
,10529,,
all10530RBall
we10531PPwe
're10532VBPbe
talking10533VVGtalk
about10534RBabout
here10535RBhere
is10536VBZbe
whether10537INwhether
...10538:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10539LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
No10540RBno
,10541,,
it10542PPit
's10543VBZbe
not10544RBnot
a10545DTa
state10546NNstate
law10547NNlaw
question10548NNquestion
.10549SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]10550LOC[MR. PALMORE]
It10551PPit
's10552VBZbe
embedded10553VVNembed
...10554:...
it10555PPit
's10556VBZbe
a10557DTa
federal10558JJfederal
question10559NNquestion
...10560:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10561LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
We10562PPwe
have10563VHPhave
said10564VVNsay
there10565EXthere
's10566VBZbe
a10567DTa
conflict10568NNconflict
,10569,,
it10570PPit
's10571VBZbe
a10572DTa
federal10573JJfederal
question10574NNquestion
...10575:...
[MR. PALMORE]10576LOC[MR. PALMORE]
It10577PPit
's10578VBZbe
a10579DTa
federal10580JJfederal
question10581NNquestion
embedded10582VVNembed
in10583INin
a10584DTa
state10585NNstate
law10586NNlaw
question10587NNquestion
because10588INbecause
the10589DTthe
state10590NNstate
law10591NNlaw
question10592NNquestion
is10593VBZbe
:10594::
Do10595VVPdo
we10596PPwe
intend10597VVPintend
to10598TOto
use10599VVuse
this10600DTthis
money10601NNmoney
to10602TOto
clean10603VVclean
up10604RPup
our10605PP$our
land10606NNland
?10607SENT?
And10608CCand
that10609WDTthat
prevents10610VVZprevent
windfalls10611NNSwindfall
.10612SENT.
That10613DTthat
's10614VBZbe
the10615DTthe
Montana10616NPMontana
Supreme10617NPSupreme
Court10618NPCourt
's10619POS's
decision10620NNdecision
in10621INin
Sunburst10622NNsunburst
.10623SENT.
What10624WPWhat
they10625PPthey
're10626VBPbe
saying10627VVGsay
is10628VBZbe
,10629,,
well10630UHwell
,10631,,
you10632PPyou
may10633MDmay
not10634RBnot
get10635VVget
EPA10636NPEPA
approval10637NNapproval
to10638TOto
clean10639VVclean
your10640PP$your
land10641NNland
,10642,,
so10643RBso
you10644PPyou
would10645MDwould
n't10646RBn't
actually10647RBactually
be10648VBbe
able10649JJable
to10650TOto
do10651VVdo
it10652PPit
.10653SENT.
How10654WRBHow
that10655DTthat
uncertainty10656NNuncertainty
,10657,,
that10658DTthat
possibility10659NNpossibility
of10660INof
need10661NNneed
for10662INfor
EPA10663NPEPA
approval10664NNapproval
would10665MDwould
be10666VBbe
factored10667VVNfactor
into10668INinto
the10669DTthe
damages10670NNSdamage
calculation10671NNcalculation
is10672VBZbe
a10673DTa
state10674NNstate
law10675NNlaw
question10676NNquestion
.10677SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10678LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Can10679MDcan
...10680:...
[MR. PALMORE]10681LOC[MR. PALMORE]
If10682INif
I10683PPI
could10684MDcould
return10685VVreturn
to10686TOto
Justice10687NPJustice
Breyer10688NPBreyer
's10689POS's
question10690NNquestion
.10691SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10692LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well10693UHWell
,10694,,
okay10695JJokay
,10696,,
before10697INbefore
you10698PPyou
do10699VVPdo
that10700IN/thatthat
,10701,,
I10702PPI
just10703RBjust
was10704VBDbe
hoping10705VVGhope
you10706PPyou
might10707MDmight
return10708VVreturn
to10709TOto
Justice10710NPJustice
Ginsburg10711NPGinsburg
's10712POS's
question10713NNquestion
.10714SENT.
And10715CCand
let10716VVlet
...10717:...
let10718VVlet
's10719VBZbe
suppose10720VVsuppose
for10721INfor
the10722DTthe
purposes10723NNSpurpose
of10724INof
this10725DTthis
hypothetical10726JJhypothetical
that10727IN/thatthat
you10728PPyou
're10729VBPbe
...10730:...
you10731PPyou
're10732VBPbe
not10733RBnot
a10734DTa
PRP10735NPPRP
but10736CCbut
that10737IN/thatthat
EPA10738NPEPA
thinks10739VVZthink
that10740IN/thatthat
some10741DTsome
aspects10742NNSaspect
of10743INof
your10744PP$your
plan10745NNplan
would10746MDwould
interfere10747VVinterfere
with10748INwith
its10749PP$its
interests10750NNSinterest
.10751SENT.
You10752PPyou
said10753VVDsay
that10754IN/thatthat
the10755DTthe
EPA10756NPEPA
has10757VHZhave
plenty10758NNplenty
of10759INof
tools10760NNStool
available10761JJavailable
to10762TOto
it10763PPit
in10764INin
that10765DTthat
scenario10766NNscenario
to10767TOto
address10768VVaddress
any10769DTany
conflicts10770NNSconflict
.10771SENT.
Can10772MDcan
you10773PPyou
be10774VBbe
specific10775JJspecific
about10776INabout
what10777WPwhat
EPA10778NPEPA
could10779MDcould
do10780VVdo
to10781TOto
take10782VVtake
care10783NNcare
of10784INof
its10785PP$its
interests10786NNSinterest
in10787INin
that10788DTthat
scenario10789NNscenario
?10790SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]10791LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Yes10792NPYes
,10793,,
Your10794PP$your
Honor10795NPHonor
.10796SENT.
And10797CCand
I10798PPI
...10799:...
I10800PPI
...10801:...
you10802PPyou
do10803VVPdo
n't10804RBn't
have10805VHhave
to10806TOto
take10807VVtake
my10808PP$my
...10809:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10810LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Because10811INbecause
12210812CD@card@
won10813MDwill
't10814RB't
work10815NNwork
,10816,,
right10817RBright
?10818SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]10819LOC[MR. PALMORE]
You10820PPyou
do10821VVPdo
n't10822RBn't
have10823VHhave
to10824TOto
take10825VVtake
my10826PP$my
word10827NNword
for10828INfor
it10829PPit
.10830SENT.
You10831PPyou
can10832MDcan
look10833VVlook
at10834INat
page10835NNpage
1710836CD@card@
of10837INof
the10838DTthe
government10839NNgovernment
's10840POS's
invitation10841NNinvitation
brief10842NNbrief
in10843INin
this10844DTthis
case10845NNcase
,10846,,
where10847WRBwhere
it10848PPit
said10849VVDsay
you10850PPyou
do10851VVPdo
n't10852RBn't
need10853VVneed
to10854TOto
take10855VVtake
cert10856NNcert
on10857INon
this10858DTthis
PRP10859NPPRP
issue10860NNissue
because10861INbecause
we10862PPwe
have10863VHPhave
plenty10864NNplenty
of10865INof
tools10866NNStool
in10867INin
order10868NNorder
to10869TOto
safeguard10870VVsafeguard
the10871DTthe
integrity10872NNintegrity
of10873INof
our10874PP$our
remedial10875JJremedial
plan10876NNplan
.10877SENT.
Those10878DTthose
are10879VBPbe
under10880INunder
Section10881NPSection
10610882CD@card@
.10883SENT.
It10884PPit
can10885MDcan
seek10886VVseek
administrative10887JJadministrative
orders10888NNSorder
.10889SENT.
It10890PPit
can10891MDcan
seek10892VVseek
injunctions10893NNSinjunction
.10894SENT.
There10895EXthere
are10896VBPbe
plenty10897NNplenty
of10898INof
tools10899NNStool
it10900PPit
can10901MDcan
...10902:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10903LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Can10904MDcan
it10905PPit
do10906VVdo
that10907IN/thatthat
even10908RBeven
with10909INwith
respect10910NNrespect
to10911TOto
somebody10912NNsomebody
who10913WPwho
's10914VBZbe
not10915RBnot
a10916DTa
PRP10917NPPRP
?10918SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]10919LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Absolutely10920RBabsolutely
.10921SENT.
If10922INif
...10923:...
if10924INif
someone10925NNsomeone
is10926VBZbe
going10927VVGgo
to10928TOto
do10929VVdo
something10930NNsomething
that10931WDTthat
's10932VBZbe
going10933VVGgo
to10934TOto
release10935VVrelease
toxic10936JJtoxic
substances10937NNSsubstance
into10938INinto
the10939DTthe
...10940:...
onto10941INonto
their10942PP$their
neighbors10943NNSneighbor
'10944POS'
property10945NNproperty
or10946CCor
into10947INinto
a10948DTa
creek10949NNcreek
or10950CCor
something10951NNsomething
,10952,,
then10953RBthen
they10954PPthey
have10955VHPhave
plenty10956NNplenty
of10957INof
tools10958NNStool
to10959TOto
address10960VVaddress
that10961DTthat
.10962SENT.
They10963PPthey
do10964VVPdo
n't10965RBn't
need10966VVneed
this10967DTthis
...10968:...
this10969DTthis
ongoing10970JJongoing
supervision10971NNsupervision
.10972SENT.
And10973CCand
that10974DTthat
ties10975NNSty
into10976INinto
a10977DTa
part10978NNpart
of10979INof
Justice10980NPJustice
Breyer10981NPBreyer
's10982POS's
question10983NNquestion
,10984,,
which10985WDTwhich
I10986PPI
did10987VVDdo
n't10988RBn't
ask10989VVask
yet10990RByet
.10991SENT.
I10992PPI
think10993VVPthink
...10994:...
answer10995VVanswer
yet10996RByet
,10997,,
which10998WDTwhich
is10999VBZbe
you11000PPyou
were11001VBDbe
asking11002VVGask
about11003RBabout
well11004RBwell
,11005,,
could11006MDcould
n't11007RBn't
they11008PPthey
get11009VVPget
approval11010NNapproval
and11011CCand
why11012WRBwhy
is11013VBZbe
this11014DTthis
...11015:...
why11016WRBwhy
might11017MDmight
this11018RBthis
be11019VBbe
a11020DTa
taking11021NNtaking
.11022SENT.
It11023PPit
depends11024VVZdepend
on11025INon
what11026WPwhat
the11027DTthe
default11028NNdefault
rule11029NNrule
is11030VBZbe
,11031,,
right11032RBright
?11033SENT?
Where11034WRBwhere
does11035VVZdo
the11036DTthe
property11037NNproperty
right11038NNright
lie11039NNlie
?11040SENT?
Does11041VVZdo
it11042PPit
lie11043VVPlie
with11044INwith
...11045:...
lie11046VVlie
with11047INwith
EPA11048NPEPA
?11049SENT?
Or11050CCor
does11051VVZdo
it11052PPit
lie11053VVPlie
with11054INwith
the11055DTthe
landowners11056NNSlandowner
?11057SENT?
Under11058INunder
Montana11059NPMontana
law11060NNlaw
,11061,,
we11062PPwe
have11063VHPhave
a11064DTa
right11065NNright
,11066,,
a11067DTa
wrongdoer11068NNwrongdoer
has11069VHZhave
put11070VVNput
arsenic11071NNarsenic
on11072INon
our11073PP$our
land11074NNland
,11075,,
and11076CCand
we11077PPwe
have11078VHPhave
a11079DTa
state11080NNstate
law11081NNlaw
right11082RBright
to11083TOto
get11084VVget
a11085DTa
judgment11086NNjudgment
sufficient11087JJsufficient
to11088TOto
remove11089VVremove
it11090PPit
.11091SENT.
It11092PPit
's11093VBZbe
not11094RBnot
...11095:...
that11096WDTthat
's11097VBZbe
not11098RBnot
applying11099VVGapply
the11100DTthe
CERCLA11101NPCERCLA
health11102NNhealth
standard11103NNstandard
.11104SENT.
That11105DTthat
's11106VBZbe
applying11107VVGapply
bread-and-butter11108JJbread-and-butter
Montana11109NPMontana
property11110NNproperty
law11111NNlaw
.11112SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11113LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Am11114VBPbe
I11115PPI
right11116JJright
that11117IN/thatthat
your11118PP$your
answer11119NNanswer
to11120TOto
Justice11121NPJustice
Gorsuch11122NPGorsuch
's11123POS's
question11124NNquestion
really11125RBreally
just11126RBjust
turns11127VVZturn
on11128INon
who11129WPwho
has11130VHZhave
the11131DTthe
burden11132NNburden
?11133SENT?
Under11134INunder
your11135PP$your
theory11136NNtheory
,11137,,
EPA11138NPEPA
has11139VHZhave
the11140DTthe
burden11141NNburden
to11142TOto
initiate11143VVinitiate
proceedings11144NNSproceeding
;11145:;
under11146INunder
the11147DTthe
other11148JJother
side11149NNside
's11150POS's
argument11151NNargument
,11152,,
the11153DTthe
landowner11154NNlandowner
has11155VHZhave
the11156DTthe
burden11157NNburden
to11158TOto
go11159VVgo
to11160TOto
EPA11161NPEPA
first11162JJfirst
?11163SENT?
Is11164VBZbe
that11165IN/thatthat
an11166DTan
accurate11167JJaccurate
way11168NNway
of11169INof
looking11170VVGlook
at11171INat
it11172PPit
?11173SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]11174LOC[MR. PALMORE]
That11175DTthat
is11176VBZbe
,11177,,
Your11178PP$your
Honor11179NPHonor
.11180SENT.
So11181INso
they11182PPthey
...11183:...
the11184DTthe
presumption11185NNpresumption
is11186VBZbe
we11187PPwe
are11188VBPbe
private11189JJprivate
property11190NNproperty
owners11191NNSowner
,11192,,
that11193WDTthat
we11194PPwe
have11195VHPhave
control11196NNcontrol
of11197INof
our11198PP$our
own11199JJown
property11200NNproperty
,11201,,
and11202CCand
we11203PPwe
can11204MDcan
remove11205VVremove
arsenic11206NNarsenic
on11207INon
our11208PP$our
own11209JJown
property11210NNproperty
if11211INif
we11212PPwe
want11213VVPwant
to11214TOto
.11215SENT.
Nothing11216NNnothing
in11217INin
their11218PP$their
1711219CD@card@
12211220CD@card@
(11221((
e11222LSe
)11223))
(11224((
611225CD6
)11226))
argument11227NNargument
...11228:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11229LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
The11230DTthe
question11231NNquestion
is11232VBZbe
whether11233INwhether
CERCLA11234NPCERCLA
displaces11235VVZdisplace
that11236DTthat
presumption11237NNpresumption
.11238SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]11239LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Whether11240NPWhether
CERCLA11241NPCERCLA
displaces11242VVZdisplace
that11243IN/thatthat
forever11244RBforever
...11245:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11246LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Right11247NPRight
.11248SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]11249LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Right11250NPRight
?11251SENT?
A11252DTa
thousand11253CDthousand
years11254NNSyear
from11255INfrom
now11256RBnow
,11257,,
under11258INunder
their11259PP$their
view11260NNview
,11261,,
we11262PPwe
would11263MDwould
...11264:...
if11265INif
we11266PPwe
wanted11267VVDwant
to11268TOto
remove11269VVremove
a11270DTa
shovelful11271NNshovelful
...11272:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11273LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But11274CCbut
either11275RBeither
...11276:...
[MR. PALMORE]11277LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...11278:...
of11279INof
dirt11280NNdirt
...11281:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11282LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...11283:...
way11284NNway
...11285:...
sorry11286RBsorry
to11287TOto
interrupt11288VVinterrupt
.11289SENT.
Either11290DTeither
way11291NNway
,11292,,
EPA11293NPEPA
would11294MDwould
have11295VHhave
the11296DTthe
say11297NNsay
.11298SENT.
It11299PPit
's11300VBZbe
just11301RBjust
whether11302INwhether
EPA11303NPEPA
initiates11304NNSinitiate
or11305CCor
you11306PPyou
go11307VVPgo
to11308TOto
EPA11309NPEPA
.11310SENT.
I11311PPI
think11312VVPthink
you11313PPyou
just11314RBjust
said11315VVDsay
that11316DTthat
.11317SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]11318LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Yeah11319NPYeah
,11320,,
but11321CCbut
I11322PPI
think11323VVPthink
the11324DTthe
default11325NNdefault
rule11326NNrule
is11327VBZbe
critical11328JJcritical
,11329,,
right11330RBright
?11331SENT?
I11332PPI
mean11333VVPmean
,11334,,
we11335PPwe
have11336VHPhave
the11337DTthe
bundle11338NNbundle
of11339INof
property11340NNproperty
rights11341NNSright
...11342:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11343LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Yeah11344NPYeah
.11345SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]11346LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...11347:...
and11348CCand
if11349INif
we11350PPwe
,11351,,
you11352PPyou
know11353VVPknow
,11354,,
commit11355VVPcommit
an11356DTan
environmental11357JJenvironmental
offense11358NNoffense
,11359,,
then11360RBthen
EPA11361NPEPA
as11362INas
a11363DTa
regulator11364NNregulator
can11365MDcan
use11366VVuse
its11367PP$its
power11368NNpower
...11369:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]11370LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
What11371WPWhat
would11372MDwould
the11373DTthe
...11374:...
[MR. PALMORE]11375LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...11376:...
to11377TOto
go11378VVgo
after11379INafter
us11380PPus
.11381SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]11382LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...11383:...
government11384NNgovernment
have11385VHPhave
to11386TOto
show11387VVshow
?11388SENT?
What11389WPWhat
's11390VBZbe
the11391DTthe
...11392:...
what11393WPwhat
would11394MDwould
...11395:...
what11396WPwhat
would11397MDwould
the11398DTthe
test11399NNtest
be11400VBbe
?11401SENT?
What11402WPWhat
would11403MDwould
the11404DTthe
legal11405JJlegal
standard11406NNstandard
be11407VBbe
?11408SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]11409LOC[MR. PALMORE]
If11410INif
...11411:...
if11412INif
they11413PPthey
went11414VVDgo
after11415INafter
us11416PPus
,11417,,
it11418PPit
would11419MDwould
be11420VBbe
a11421DTa
violation11422NNviolation
of11423INof
...11424:...
of11425INof
CERCLA11426NPCERCLA
.11427SENT.
These11428DTthese
are11429VBPbe
the11430DTthe
...11431:...
this11432DTthis
is11433VBZbe
what11434WPwhat
...11435:...
and11436CCand
the11437DTthe
government11438NNgovernment
itself11439PPitself
took11440VVDtake
the11441DTthe
position11442NNposition
that11443IN/thatthat
those11444DTthose
tools11445NNStool
are11446VBPbe
fully11447RBfully
adequate11448JJadequate
here11449RBhere
to11450TOto
protect11451VVprotect
the11452DTthe
integrity11453NNintegrity
of11454INof
the11455DTthe
remedy11456NNremedy
.11457SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]11458LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
These11459DTthese
things11460NNSthing
are11461VBPbe
likely11462JJlikely
to11463TOto
be11464VBbe
pretty11465RBpretty
complicated11466VVNcomplicate
.11467SENT.
And11468CCand
if11469INif
we11470PPwe
...11471:...
one11472CDone
way11473NNway
,11474,,
it11475PPit
's11476VBZbe
central11477JJcentral
,11478,,
everyone11479NNeveryone
goes11480VVZgo
to11481TOto
EPA11482NPEPA
,11483,,
and11484CCand
there11485EXthere
's11486VBZbe
a11487DTa
central11488JJcentral
review11489NNreview
in11490INin
court11491NNcourt
.11492SENT.
The11493DTthe
other11494JJother
way11495NNway
,11496,,
you11497PPyou
want11498VVPwant
EPA11499NPEPA
to11500TOto
go11501VVgo
to11502TOto
any11503DTany
place11504NNplace
where11505WRBwhere
a11506DTa
landowner11507NNlandowner
has11508VHZhave
a11509DTa
law11510NNlaw
in11511INin
...11512:...
in11513INin
his11514PP$his
favor11515NNfavor
that11516WDTthat
lets11517VVZlet
him11518PPhim
do11519VVPdo
some11520DTsome
things11521NNSthing
,11522,,
and11523CCand
EPA11524NPEPA
is11525VBZbe
going11526VVGgo
to11527TOto
have11528VHhave
to11529TOto
prove11530VVprove
that11531IN/thatthat
this11532DTthis
particular11533JJparticular
thing11534NNthing
in11535INin
each11536DTeach
of11537INof
these11538DTthese
cases11539NNScase
is11540VBZbe
a11541DTa
CERCLA11542NPCERCLA
violation11543NNviolation
,11544,,
which11545WDTwhich
is11546VBZbe
already11547RBalready
a11548DTa
standard11549NNstandard
that11550WDTthat
's11551VBZbe
...11552:...
it11553PPit
might11554MDmight
not11555RBnot
,11556,,
it11557PPit
might11558MDmight
just11559RBjust
be11560VBbe
an11561DTan
interference11562NNinterference
with11563INwith
their11564PP$their
plan11565NNplan
.11566SENT.
It11567PPit
might11568MDmight
just11569RBjust
be11570VBbe
raising11571VVGraise
the11572DTthe
cost11573NNcost
of11574INof
their11575PP$their
plan11576NNplan
.11577SENT.
It11578PPit
might11579MDmight
be11580VBbe
who11581WPwho
knows11582VVZknow
.11583SENT.
I11584PPI
'm11585VBPbe
not11586RBnot
an11587DTan
expert11588NNexpert
in11589INin
this11590DTthis
.11591SENT.
But11592CCbut
that11593WDTthat
's11594VBZbe
...11595:...
that11596WDTthat
's11597VBZbe
the11598DTthe
question11599NNquestion
:11600::
How11601WRBHow
did11602VVDdo
Congress11603NPCongress
want11604VVPwant
this11605DTthis
to11606TOto
work11607VVwork
?11608SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]11609LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Right11610RBright
.11611SENT.
And11612CCand
one11613PPone
can11614MDcan
imagine11615VVimagine
Congress11616NPCongress
writing11617VVGwrite
a11618DTa
statute11619NNstatute
to11620TOto
give11621VVgive
EPA11622NPEPA
complete11623JJcomplete
control11624NNcontrol
,11625,,
but11626CCbut
it11627PPit
did11628VVDdo
n't11629RBn't
...11630:...
it11631PPit
did11632VVDdo
n't11633RBn't
do11634VVdo
that11635DTthat
.11636SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]11637LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And11638CCand
it11639PPit
might11640MDmight
have11641VHhave
used11642VVNuse
the11643DTthe
words11644NNSword
potentially11645RBpotentially
responsible11646JJresponsible
person11647NNperson
has11648VHZhave
to11649TOto
go11650VVgo
to11651TOto
EPA11652NPEPA
and11653CCand
,11654,,
by11655INby
that11656IN/thatthat
,11657,,
meant11658VVDmean
that11659IN/thatthat
those11660DTthose
people11661NNSpeople
who11662WPwho
live11663VVPlive
or11664CCor
own11665VVPown
property11666NNproperty
on11667INon
a11668DTa
toxic11669JJtoxic
waste11670NNwaste
center11671NNcenter
.11672SENT.
That11673DTthat
's11674VBZbe
what11675WPwhat
they11676PPthey
argue11677VVPargue
.11678SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]11679LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Right11680NPRight
,11681,,
Your11682PP$your
Honor11683NPHonor
,11684,,
their11685PP$their
position11686NNposition
is11687VBZbe
that11688IN/thatthat
every11689DTevery
single11690JJsingle
private11691JJprivate
property11692NNproperty
landowner11693NNlandowner
...11694:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]11695LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah11696NPYeah
.11697SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]11698LOC[MR. PALMORE]
...11699:...
in11700INin
this11701DTthis
vast11702JJvast
300-square-mile11703JJ300-square-mile
Superfund11704NPSuperfund
site11705NNsite
has11706VHZhave
to11707TOto
get11708VVget
their11709PP$their
permission11710NNpermission
to11711TOto
remove11712VVremove
even11713RBeven
a11714DTa
shovelful11715NNshovelful
of11716INof
dirt11717NNdirt
from11718INfrom
their11719PP$their
own11720JJown
backyard11721NNbackyard
.11722SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]11723LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No11724NPNo
,11725,,
I11726PPI
do11727VVPdo
n't11728RBn't
know11729VVknow
that11730WDTthat
they11731PPthey
...11732:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11733LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well11734UHWell
,11735,,
but11736CCbut
that11737DTthat
's11738VBZbe
the11739DTthe
reason11740NNreason
,11741,,
though11742RBthough
...11743:...
[MR. PALMORE]11744LOC[MR. PALMORE]
That11745DTthat
is11746VBZbe
page11747NNpage
3411748CD@card@
of11749INof
the11750DTthe
Blue11751NPBlue
Brief11752NPBrief
.11753SENT.
ARCO11754NPARCO
says11755VVZsay
remedial11756JJremedial
action11757NNaction
covers11758VVZcover
virtually11759RBvirtually
any11760DTany
physical11761JJphysical
action11762NNaction
with11763INwith
respect11764NNrespect
to11765TOto
hazardous11766JJhazardous
waste11767NNwaste
at11768INat
the11769DTthe
site11770NNsite
,11771,,
including11772VVGinclude
storage11773NNstorage
,11774,,
excavation11775NNexcavation
.11776SENT.
It11777PPit
has11778VHZhave
a11779DTa
list11780NNlist
there11781RBthere
.11782SENT.
It11783PPit
's11784VBZbe
virtually11785RBvirtually
anything11786NNanything
.11787SENT.
They11788PPthey
're11789VBPbe
saying11790VVGsay
that11791IN/thatthat
our11792PP$our
...11793:...
my11794PP$my
clients11795NNSclient
in11796INin
Opportunity11797NPOpportunity
,11798,,
Montana11799NPMontana
,11800,,
have11801VHPhave
to11802TOto
get11803VVget
permission11804NNpermission
from11805INfrom
EPA11806NPEPA
in11807INin
Washington11808NPWashington
if11809INif
they11810PPthey
want11811VVPwant
to11812TOto
dig11813VVdig
out11814RPout
part11815NNpart
of11816INof
their11817PP$their
backyard11818NNbackyard
to11819TOto
put11820VVput
in11821INin
a11822DTa
sandbox11823NNsandbox
for11824INfor
their11825PP$their
grandchildren11826NNSgrandchild
and11827CCand
...11828:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]11829LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And11830CCand
are11831VBPbe
you11832PPyou
saying11833VVGsay
also11834RBalso
it11835PPit
's11836VBZbe
an11837DTan
...11838:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11839LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well11840UHwell
,11841,,
you11842PPyou
can11843MDcan
say11844VVsay
dig11845NNdig
out11846RPout
...11847:...
you11848PPyou
can11849MDcan
say11850VVsay
dig11851VVdig
out11852RPout
part11853NNpart
of11854INof
their11855PP$their
backyard11856NNbackyard
.11857SENT.
EPA11858NPEPA
would11859MDwould
say11860VVsay
if11861INif
you11862PPyou
want11863VVPwant
to11864TOto
disturb11865VVdisturb
arsenic-infected11866JJarsenic-infected
land11867NNland
,11868,,
dirt11869NNdirt
in11870INin
a11871DTa
way11872NNway
that11873WDTthat
would11874MDwould
not11875RBnot
only11876RBonly
harm11877VVharm
your11878PP$your
neighbors11879NNSneighbor
but11880CCbut
could11881MDcould
harm11882VVharm
people11883NNSpeople
many11884JJmany
...11885:...
many11886JJmany
miles11887NNSmile
away11888RBaway
.11889SENT.
I11890PPI
mean11891VVPmean
,11892,,
yes11893UHyes
,11894,,
you11895PPyou
want11896VVPwant
to11897TOto
just11898RBjust
do11899VVdo
things11900NNSthing
...11901:...
[MR. PALMORE]11902LOC[MR. PALMORE]
And11903CCand
if11904INif
...11905:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11906LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
...11907:...
on11908INon
your11909PP$your
land11910NNland
,11911,,
but11912CCbut
you11913PPyou
can11914MDcan
't11915RB't
overlook11916VVPoverlook
the11917DTthe
fact11918NNfact
that11919IN/thatthat
that11920DTthat
is11921VBZbe
going11922VVGgo
to11923TOto
have11924VHhave
harmful11925JJharmful
effects11926NNSeffect
on11927INon
everybody11928NNeverybody
else11929RBelse
around11930INaround
you11931PPyou
.11932SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]11933LOC[MR. PALMORE]
And11934CCand
if11935INif
you11936PPyou
assume11937VVPassume
that11938DTthat
harm11939NNharm
that11940WDTthat
's11941VBZbe
assumed11942VVNassume
,11943,,
embedded11944VVNembed
,11945,,
in11946INin
your11947PP$your
question11948NNquestion
,11949,,
they11950PPthey
have11951VHPhave
the11952DTthe
tools11953NNStool
to11954TOto
go11955VVgo
after11956INafter
that11957DTthat
.11958SENT.
What11959WPWhat
I11960PPI
'm11961VBPbe
talking11962VVGtalk
about11963RBabout
is11964VBZbe
when11965WRBwhen
there11966EXthere
's11967VBZbe
no11968RBno
showing11969VVGshow
of11970INof
harm11971NNharm
.11972SENT.
Their11973PP$their
argument11974NNargument
is11975VBZbe
whether11976INwhether
there11977EXthere
's11978VBZbe
harm11979NNharm
or11980CCor
not11981RBnot
,11982,,
we11983PPwe
have11984VHPhave
to11985TOto
get11986VVget
their11987PP$their
permission11988NNpermission
.11989SENT.
And11990CCand
if11991INif
I11992PPI
can11993MDcan
...11994:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]11995LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
I11996PPI
guess11997VVPguess
the11998DTthe
...11999:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12000LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Just12001RBjust
...12002:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]12003LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...12004:...
question12005NNquestion
,12006,,
though12007RBthough
,12008,,
is12009VBZbe
...12010:...
and12011CCand
,12012,,
you12013PPyou
know12014VVPknow
,12015,,
you12016PPyou
might12017MDmight
say12018VVsay
,12019,,
look12020VVlook
,12021,,
this12022DTthis
is12023VBZbe
a12024DTa
policy12025NNpolicy
matter12026NNmatter
and12027CCand
Congress12028NPCongress
decided12029VVDdecide
it12030PPit
.12031SENT.
But12032CCbut
I12033PPI
guess12034VVPguess
the12035DTthe
question12036NNquestion
is12037VBZbe
it12038PPit
...12039:...
it12040PPit
's12041VBZbe
hard12042JJhard
for12043INfor
EPA12044NPEPA
to12045TOto
go12046VVgo
around12047RParound
and12048CCand
try12049VVtry
to12050TOto
figure12051VVfigure
out12052RPout
who12053WPwho
's12054VBZbe
creating12055VVGcreate
sandboxes12056NNSsandbox
.12057SENT.
And12058CCand
so12059RBso
why12060WRBwhy
should12061MDshould
the12062DTthe
onus12063NNonus
be12064VBbe
on12065INon
EPA12066NPEPA
to12067TOto
figure12068VVfigure
out12069RPout
who12070WPwho
's12071VBZbe
creating12072VVGcreate
sandboxes12073NNSsandbox
?12074SENT?
[MR. PALMORE]12075LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Well12076UHWell
,12077,,
EPA12078NPEPA
is12079VBZbe
,12080,,
of12081INof
course12082NNcourse
,12083,,
all12084RBall
over12085INover
this12086DTthis
site12087NNsite
,12088,,
and12089CCand
it12090PPit
can12091MDcan
enforce12092VVenforce
the12093DTthe
law12094NNlaw
here12095RBhere
.12096SENT.
The12097DTthe
question12098NNquestion
is12099VBZbe
whether12100INwhether
we12101PPwe
are12102VBPbe
...12103:...
should12104MDshould
be12105VBbe
similarly12106RBsimilarly
situated12107VVNsituate
to12108TOto
just12109RBjust
you12110PPyou
and12111CCand
me12112PPme
and12113CCand
any12114DTany
American12115JJAmerican
who12116WPwho
,12117,,
if12118INif
we12119PPwe
violate12120VVPviolate
the12121DTthe
law12122NNlaw
,12123,,
the12124DTthe
regulator12125NNregulator
,12126,,
the12127DTthe
law12128NNlaw
enforcement12129NNenforcement
,12130,,
can12131MDcan
come12132VVcome
after12133INafter
us12134PPus
,12135,,
or12136CCor
whether12137INwhether
we12138PPwe
have12139VHPhave
this12140DTthis
kind12141NNkind
of12142INof
superintending12143VVGsuperintend
presence12144NNpresence
of12145INof
agency12146NNagency
authority12147NNauthority
over12148INover
us12149PPus
and12150CCand
our12151PP$our
private12152JJprivate
property12153NNproperty
for12154INfor
the12155DTthe
rest12156NNrest
of12157INof
our12158PP$our
lives12159NNSlife
.12160SENT.
And12161CCand
that12162DTthat
's12163VBZbe
not12164RBnot
what12165WPwhat
...12166:...
that12167WDTthat
's12168VBZbe
not12169RBnot
the12170DTthe
scheme12171NNscheme
that12172IN/thatthat
Congress12173NPCongress
created12174VVDcreate
.12175SENT.
It12176PPit
went12177VVDgo
out12178RPout
of12179INof
its12180PP$its
way12181NNway
to12182TOto
allow12183VVallow
state12184NNstate
law12185NNlaw
over12186INover
these12187DTthese
traditionally12188RBtraditionally
state12189NNstate
law12190NNlaw
subjects12191NNSsubject
to12192TOto
continue12193VVcontinue
.12194SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12195LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But12196CCbut
your12197PP$your
...12198:...
your12199PP$your
...12200:...
your12201PP$your
parade12202NNparade
of12203INof
horribles12204NNShorrible
can12205MDcan
still12206RBstill
come12207VVcome
true12208JJtrue
with12209INwith
EPA12210NPEPA
being12211VBGbe
aggressive12212JJaggressive
in12213INin
getting12214VVGget
to12215TOto
all12216PDTall
those12217DTthose
places12218NNSplace
.12219SENT.
So12220RBso
really12221RBreally
the12222DTthe
question12223NNquestion
that12224WDTthat
...12225:...
[MR. PALMORE]12226LOC[MR. PALMORE]
If12227INif
...12228:...
if12229INif
they12230PPthey
want12231VVPwant
to12232TOto
come12233VVcome
out12234RPout
...12235:...
you12236PPyou
're12237VBPbe
right12238JJright
.12239SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12240LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...12241:...
the12242DTthe
question12243NNquestion
Justice12244NPJustice
Breyer12245NPBreyer
asked12246VVNask
is12247VBZbe
does12248VVZdo
it12249PPit
make12250VVmake
sense12251NNsense
to12252TOto
have12253VHhave
you12254PPyou
go12255VVgo
to12256TOto
EPA12257NPEPA
first12258RBfirst
so12259RBso
that12260IN/thatthat
they12261PPthey
can12262MDcan
maintain12263VVmaintain
control12264NNcontrol
?12265SENT?
"12266``"
Comprehensive12267NPComprehensive
"12268''"
is12269VBZbe
the12270DTthe
word12271NNword
in12272INin
the12273DTthe
statute12274NNstatute
after12275INafter
all12276DTall
.12277SENT.
[MR. PALMORE]12278LOC[MR. PALMORE]
Your12279PP$your
Honor12280NPHonor
,12281,,
there12282EXthere
's12283VBZbe
no12284DTno
evidence12285NNevidence
that12286IN/thatthat
Congress12287NPCongress
intended12288VVDintend
this12289DTthis
obscure12290JJobscure
corner12291NNcorner
of12292INof
Section12293NPSection
12212294CD@card@
about12295INabout
settlements12296NNSsettlement
to12297TOto
give12298VVgive
EPA12299NPEPA
that12300DTthat
kind12301NNkind
of12302INof
vast12303JJvast
control12304NNcontrol
forever12305RBforever
over12306INover
private12307JJprivate
property12308NNproperty
.12309SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12310LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank12311VVthank
you12312PPyou
,12313,,
counsel12314NNcounsel
.12315SENT.
Three12316CDThree
minutes12317NNSminute
,12318,,
Ms12319NNMs
.12320SENT.
Blatt12321NPBlatt
.12322SENT.
[MS. BLATT]12323LOC[MS. BLATT]
Thank12324VVthank
you12325PPyou
,12326,,
Mr12327NPMr
.12328SENT.
Chief12329NPChief
Justice12330NPJustice
.12331SENT.
Justice12332NPJustice
Sotomayor12333NPSotomayor
,12334,,
I12335PPI
answered12336VVDanswer
one12337CDone
of12338INof
your12339PP$your
questions12340NNSquestion
incorrectly12341RBincorrectly
on12342INon
a12343DTa
cite12344VVPcite
,12345,,
and12346CCand
I12347PPI
...12348:...
I12349PPI
need12350VVPneed
to12351TOto
correct12352VVcorrect
it12353PPit
.12354SENT.
Section12355NNsection
10712356CD@card@
(12357((
q12358NNq
)12359))
(12360((
112361LS1
)12362))
(12363((
A12364NPA
)12365))
312366CD3
through12367INthrough
512368CD5
is12369VBZbe
the12370DTthe
contiguous12371JJcontiguous
landowner12372NNlandowner
provision12373NNprovision
that12374WDTthat
says12375VVZsay
if12376INif
you12377PPyou
live12378VVPlive
on12379INon
a12380DTa
Superfund12381NPSuperfund
site12382NNsite
,12383,,
no12384DTno
matter12385NNmatter
what12386WPwhat
,12387,,
you12388PPyou
have12389VHPhave
to12390TOto
make12391VVmake
sure12392RBsure
you12393PPyou
comply12394VVcomply
and12395CCand
not12396RBnot
interfere12397VVinterfere
with12398INwith
EPA12399NPEPA
.12400SENT.
So12401RBso
there12402EXthere
's12403VBZbe
provisions12404NNSprovision
throughout12405INthroughout
CERCLA12406NPCERCLA
that12407WDTthat
say12408VVPsay
no12409RBno
matter12410VVmatter
what12411WPwhat
your12412PP$your
defenses12413NNSdefense
may12414MDmay
be12415VBbe
,12416,,
you12417PPyou
always12418RBalways
are12419VBPbe
on12420INon
the12421DTthe
hook12422NNhook
to12423TOto
not12424RBnot
do12425VVdo
anything12426NNanything
to12427TOto
interfere12428VVinterfere
with12429INwith
EPA12430NPEPA
's12431POS's
remedy12432NNremedy
.12433SENT.
And12434CCand
I12435PPI
just12436RBjust
gave12437VVDgive
you12438PPyou
different12439JJdifferent
cites12440VVZcite
.12441SENT.
So12442RBso
,12443,,
on12444INon
PRPs12445NPPRPs
,12446,,
in12447INin
terms12448NNSterm
of12449INof
this12450DTthis
is12451VBZbe
a12452DTa
status12453NNstatus
and12454CCand
not12455RBnot
a12456DTa
financial12457JJfinancial
liability12458NNliability
,12459,,
EPA12460NPEPA
,12461,,
they12462PPthey
're12463VBPbe
always12464RBalways
liable12465JJliable
under12466INunder
10612467CD@card@
for12468INfor
abatement12469NNabatement
.12470SENT.
And12471CCand
they12472PPthey
're12473VBPbe
always12474RBalways
liable12475JJliable
in12476INin
a12477DTa
suit12478NNsuit
by12479INby
Atlantic12480NPAtlantic
Richfield12481NPRichfield
when12482WRBwhen
the12483DTthe
cleanup12484NNcleanup
ends12485VVZend
under12486INunder
Section12487NPSection
11312488CD@card@
(12489((
g12490NNg
)12491))
(12492((
212493LS2
)12494))
(12495((
A12496NPA
)12497))
.12498SENT.
We12499PPwe
might12500MDmight
not12501RBnot
get12502VVget
much12503JJmuch
money12504NNmoney
,12505,,
but12506CCbut
they12507PPthey
're12508VBPbe
...12509:...
they12510PPthey
're12511VBPbe
definitely12512RBdefinitely
on12513INon
the12514DTthe
hook12515NNhook
.12516SENT.
But12517CCbut
the12518DTthe
real12519JJreal
question12520NNquestion
is12521VBZbe
one12522CDone
of12523INof
status12524NNstatus
.12525SENT.
And12526CCand
it12527PPit
's12528VBZbe
...12529:...
Justice12530NPJustice
Gorsuch12531NPGorsuch
and12532CCand
Justice12533NPJustice
Kavanaugh12534NPKavanaugh
,12535,,
you12536PPyou
were12537VBDbe
wrong12538JJwrong
on12539INon
this12540DTthis
as12541INas
being12542VBGbe
a12543DTa
question12544NNquestion
of12545INof
who12546WPwho
has12547VHZhave
to12548TOto
sue12549VVsue
and12550CCand
a12551DTa
burden12552NNburden
.12553SENT.
EPA12554NPEPA
would12555MDwould
have12556VHhave
no12557DTno
way12558NNway
of12559INof
knowing12560VVGknow
what12561WPwhat
...12562:...
they12563PPthey
only12564RBonly
know12565VVPknow
in12566INin
this12567DTthis
case12568NNcase
and12569CCand
wrote12570VVDwrite
them12571PPthem
a12572DTa
letter12573NNletter
because12574INbecause
there12575EXthere
's12576VBZbe
a12577DTa
lawsuit12578NNlawsuit
and12579CCand
a12580DTa
Supreme12581NPSupreme
Court12582NPCourt
case12583NNcase
in12584INin
the12585DTthe
state12586NNstate
of12587INof
Montana12588NPMontana
,12589,,
but12590CCbut
there12591EXthere
are12592VBPbe
hundreds12593NNShundred
of12594INof
thousands12595NNSthousand
of12596INof
people12597NNSpeople
who12598WPwho
live12599VVPlive
on12600INon
...12601:...
live12602VVlive
on12603INon
Superfund12604NPSuperfund
sites12605NNSsite
with12606INwith
uranium12607NNuranium
and12608CCand
God12609NPGod
knows12610VVZknow
what12611WPwhat
else12612RBelse
,12613,,
and12614CCand
how12615WRBhow
is12616VBZbe
EPA12617NPEPA
exactly12618RBexactly
supposed12619VVDsuppose
to12620TOto
know12621VVknow
when12622WRBwhen
someone12623NNsomeone
is12624VBZbe
removing12625VVGremove
uranium12626NNuranium
?12627SENT?
It12628PPit
has12629VHZhave
a12630DTa
half-life12631NNhalf-life
of12632INof
412633CD4
.12634SENT.
712635CD7
billion12636CDbillion
years12637NNSyear
.12638SENT.
Arsenic12639NNarsenic
has12640VHZhave
no12641DTno
half-life12642NNhalf-life
.12643SENT.
It12644PPit
always12645RBalways
is12646VBZbe
there12647RBthere
.12648SENT.
It12649PPit
cannot12650MDcan
be12651VBbe
destroyed12652VVNdestroy
.12653SENT.
It12654PPit
does12655VVZdo
n't12656RBn't
evaporate12657VVevaporate
.12658SENT.
So12659RBso
,12660,,
yeah12661RByeah
,12662,,
they12663PPthey
have12664VHPhave
some12665DTsome
restrictions12666NNSrestriction
before12667INbefore
they12668PPthey
move12669VVPmove
hazardous12670JJhazardous
waste12671NNwaste
.12672SENT.
The12673DTthe
other12674JJother
thing12675NNthing
is12676VBZbe
in12677INin
terms12678NNSterm
of12679INof
who12680WPwho
you12681PPyou
'd12682MDwould
have12683VHhave
to12684TOto
sue12685VVsue
,12686,,
I12687PPI
would12688MDwould
freak12689VVfreak
out12690RPout
if12691INif
I12692PPI
got12693VVDget
a12694DTa
...12695:...
a12696DTa
...12697:...
a12698DTa
letter12699NNletter
.12700SENT.
Their12701PP$their
view12702NNview
is12703VBZbe
you12704PPyou
have12705VHPhave
to12706TOto
sue12707VVsue
these12708DTthese
poor12709JJpoor
innocent12710JJinnocent
landowners12711NNSlandowner
and12712CCand
say12713VVPsay
you12714PPyou
're12715VBPbe
liable12716JJliable
under12717INunder
CERCLA12718NPCERCLA
.12719SENT.
Just12720RBjust
so12721RBso
you12722PPyou
know12723VVPknow
,12724,,
that12725WDTthat
's12726VBZbe
the12727DTthe
only12728JJonly
way12729NNway
we12730PPwe
can12731MDcan
keep12732VVkeep
control12733NNcontrol
of12734INof
the12735DTthe
site12736NNsite
.12737SENT.
That12738DTthat
's12739VBZbe
the12740DTthe
only12741JJonly
way12742NNway
we12743PPwe
're12744VBPbe
going12745VVGgo
to12746TOto
know12747VVknow
and12748CCand
then12749RBthen
,12750,,
you12751PPyou
know12752VVPknow
,12753,,
now12754RBnow
they12755PPthey
're12756VBPbe
on12757INon
notice12758NNnotice
because12759INbecause
,12760,,
otherwise12761RBotherwise
,12762,,
you12763PPyou
would12764MDwould
have12765VHhave
this12766DTthis
metaphysical12767JJmetaphysical
thing12768NNthing
of12769INof
who12770WPwho
knows12771VVZknow
who12772WPwho
's12773VBZbe
liable12774JJliable
?12775SENT?
In12776INin
terms12777NNSterm
of12778INof
the12779DTthe
taking12780VVGtake
issue12781NNissue
,12782,,
and12783CCand
I12784PPI
think12785VVPthink
that12786IN/thatthat
Justice12787NPJustice
...12788:...
I12789PPI
mean12790VVPmean
,12791,,
you12792PPyou
guys12793VVZguy
already12794RBalready
answered12795VVNanswer
this12796DTthis
,12797,,
but12798CCbut
this12799DTthis
is12800VBZbe
really12801RBreally
a12802DTa
question12803NNquestion
of12804INof
do12805VVdo
you12806PPyou
have12807VHPhave
to12808TOto
go12809VVgo
to12810TOto
EPA12811NPEPA
.12812SENT.
If12813INif
EPA12814NPEPA
denies12815VVZdeny
permission12816NNpermission
and12817CCand
they12818PPthey
want12819VVPwant
to12820TOto
bring12821VVbring
a12822DTa
takings12823NNStaking
claim12824VVPclaim
,12825,,
go12826VVPgo
sue12827VVsue
EPA12828NPEPA
.12829SENT.
There12830EXthere
's12831VBZbe
also12832RBalso
a12833DTa
citizen12834NNcitizen
suit12835NNsuit
provision12836NNprovision
that12837IN/thatthat
in12838INin
202512839CD@card@
,12840,,
they12841PPthey
can12842MDcan
bring12843VVbring
a12844DTa
lawsuit12845NNlawsuit
and12846CCand
say12847VVPsay
:12848::
EPA12849NPEPA
,12850,,
your12851PP$your
remedy12852NNremedy
was12853VBDbe
terrible12854JJterrible
,12855,,
we12856PPwe
do12857VVPdo
n't12858RBn't
like12859VVlike
it12860PPit
,12861,,
it12862PPit
violated12863VVDviolate
CERCLA12864NPCERCLA
,12865,,
come12866VVNcome
up12867RPup
with12868INwith
a12869DTa
new12870JJnew
one12871CDone
.12872SENT.
That12873DTthat
...12874:...
that12875WDTthat
's12876VBZbe
what12877WPwhat
the12878DTthe
citizen12879NNcitizen
suit12880NNsuit
provision12881NNprovision
is12882VBZbe
before12883RBbefore
...12884:...
for12885INfor
.12886SENT.
On12887INon
the12888DTthe
mouse12889NNmouse
hole12890NNhole
point12891NNpoint
,12892,,
I12893PPI
do12894VVPdo
n't12895RBn't
think12896VVthink
it12897PPit
's12898VBZbe
a12899DTa
mouse12900NNmouse
hole12901NNhole
.12902SENT.
So12903RBso
it12904PPit
has12905VHZhave
mouses12906VVZmouse
or12907CCor
elephants12908NNSelephant
,12909,,
I12910PPI
guess12911VVPguess
,12912,,
all12913PDTall
the12914DTthe
way12915NNway
in12916INin
the12917DTthe
statute12918NNstatute
.12919SENT.
There12920EXthere
are12921VBPbe
provision12922NNprovision
after12923INafter
provision12924NNprovision
in12925INin
the12926DTthe
contiguous12927JJcontiguous
landowner12928NNlandowner
,12929,,
in12930INin
the12931DTthe
demicrominimus12932NNdemicrominimus
...12933:...
or12934CCor
whatever12935WDTwhatever
that12936DTthat
word12937NNword
is12938VBZbe
...12939:...
in12940INin
the12941DTthe
bona12942NNbona
fide12943NNfide
landowner12944NNlandowner
that12945WDTthat
says12946VVZsay
at12947INat
all12948DTall
times12949NNStime
you12950PPyou
have12951VHPhave
to12952TOto
make12953VVmake
sure12954JJsure
you12955PPyou
do12956VVPdo
n't12957RBn't
interfere12958VVinterfere
with12959INwith
EPA12960NPEPA
's12961POS's
remedy12962NNremedy
.12963SENT.
Thank12964VVthank
you12965PPyou
.12966SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12967LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank12968VVthank
you12969PPyou
,12970,,
counsel12971NNcounsel
.12972SENT.
The12973DTthe
case12974NNcase
is12975VBZbe
submitted12976VVNsubmit
.12977SENT.