<s> /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/ptreetagger/Atlantic.xml-src.tt /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/treetagger/Atlantic.xml-out.tt pos tagset built from model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par en lemma of the model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par - [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We2PPwe 'll3MDwill hear4VVhear argument5NNargument next6JJnext in7INin Case8NPCase 17-14989CD@card@ ,10,, Atlantic11NPAtlantic Richfield12NPRichfield versus13CCversus Christian14NPChristian .15SENT. Ms16NNMs .17SENT. Blatt18NPBlatt .19SENT.

[MS. BLATT]20LOC[MS. BLATT] Thank21VVthank you22PPyou ,23,, Mr24NPMr .25SENT. Chief26NPChief Justice27NPJustice ,28,, and29CCand may30MDmay it31PPit please32VVplease the33DTthe Court34NPCourt :35:: This36DTthis case37NNcase involves38VVZinvolve whether39INwhether the40DTthe hundreds41NNShundred of42INof thousands43NNSthousand of44INof landowners45NNSlandowner on46INon Superfund47NPSuperfund sites48NNSsite can49MDcan bring50VVbring state51NNstate lawsuits52NNSlawsuit to53TOto implement54VVimplement their55PP$their own56JJown piecemeal57JJpiecemeal hazardous58JJhazardous waste59NNwaste cleanups60NNScleanup .61SENT. The62DTthe answer63NNanswer should64MDshould be65VBbe no66RBno .67SENT. CERCLA68NPCERCLA entrusts69VVZentrust EPA70NPEPA to71TOto protect72VVprotect human73JJhuman health74NNhealth and75CCand the76DTthe environment77NNenvironment by78INby developing79VVGdevelop a80DTa remedial81JJremedial plan82NNplan that83WDTthat protects84VVZprotect the85DTthe whole86JJwhole community87NNcommunity .88SENT. Respondents89NNSrespondent are90VBPbe profoundly91RBprofoundly wrong92JJwrong that93IN/thatthat removing94VVGremove waste95NNwaste is96VBZbe always97RBalways better98RBRwell than99INthan leaving100VVGleave it101PPit in102INin place103NNplace .104SENT. Superfund105NPSuperfund sites106NNSsite contain107VVPcontain extremely108RBextremely hazardous109JJhazardous substances110NNSsubstance ,111,, lead112NNlead ,113,, mercury114NNmercury ,115,, plutonium116NNplutonium ,117,, to118TOto name119VVname a120DTa few121JJfew .122SENT. Excavation123NNexcavation ,124,, transportation125NNtransportation ,126,, and127CCand disposal128NNdisposal of129INof these130DTthese substances131NNSsubstance is132VBZbe risky133JJrisky not134RBnot only135RBonly to136TOto neighbors137NNSneighbor but138CCbut the139DTthe millions140NNSmillion of141INof people142NNSpeople who143WPwho live144VVPlive next145JJnext door146NNdoor to147TOto Superfund148NPSuperfund sites149NNSsite .150SENT. Whether151INwhether these152DTthese risks153NNSrisk are154VBPbe worth155JJworth any156DTany benefits157NNSbenefit should158MDshould be159VBbe evaluated160VVNevaluate by161INby EPA162NPEPA ,163,, not164RBnot juries165NNSjury on166INon an167DTan ad168FWad hoc169FWhoc basis170NNbasis .171SENT. Since172INsince 2013173CD@card@ ,174,, EPA175NPEPA has176VHZhave objected177VVNobject that178IN/thatthat Respondents179NNSrespondent '180POS' restoration181NNrestoration remedy182NNremedy would183MDwould thwart184VVthwart more185JJRmore than186INthan three187CDthree decades188NNSdecade of189INof efforts190NNSeffort ...191:... of192INof its193PP$its efforts194NNSeffort at195INat the196DTthe Anaconda197NNanaconda site198NNsite ,199,, including200VVGinclude by201INby digging202VVGdig up203RPup soil204NNsoil that205IN/thatthat EPA206NPEPA wants207VVZwant left208RBleft undisturbed209JJundisturbed and210CCand by211INby building212VVGbuild miles213NNSmile of214INof underground215JJunderground trenches216NNStrench that217WDTthat would218MDwould affect219VVaffect an220DTan entire221JJentire community222NNcommunity 's223POS's groundwater224NNgroundwater .225SENT. This226DTthis Court227NPCourt should228MDshould reverse229VVreverse for230INfor three231CDthree reasons232NNSreason .233SENT. First234RBfirst ,235,, Section236NNsection 113237CD@card@ bars238NNSbar Respondents239NNSrespondent '240POS' challenge241NNchallenge to242TOto EPA243NPEPA 's244POS's remedy245NNremedy .246SENT. Second247RBsecond ,248,, Section249NNsection 122250CD@card@ bars251NNSbar Respondents252NNSrespondent from253INfrom undertaking254VVGundertake any255DTany remedial256JJremedial actions257NNSaction absent258VVPabsent EPA259NPEPA 's260POS's authorization261NNauthorization .262SENT. And263CCand ,264,, third265JJthird ,266,, a267DTa restoration268NNrestoration remedy269NNremedy is270VBZbe preempted271VVNpreempt because272INbecause it273PPit would274MDwould require275VVrequire Atlantic276NPAtlantic Richfield277NPRichfield to278TOto effectuate279VVeffectuate the280DTthe very281JJvery cleanup282NNcleanup that283IN/thatthat federal284JJfederal law285NNlaw prohibits286VVZprohibit the287DTthe company288NNcompany from289INfrom doing290VVGdo on291INon its292PP$its own293JJown ,294,, and295CCand a296DTa restoration297NNrestoration remedy298NNremedy would299MDwould prevent300VVprevent EPA301NPEPA from302INfrom carrying303VVGcarry out304RPout its305PP$its statutory306JJstatutory mandate307NNmandate to308TOto implement309VVimplement comprehensive310JJcomprehensive cleanups311NNScleanup .312SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]313LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Ms314NNMs .315SENT. Blatt316NPBlatt ,317,, I318PPI 've319VHPhave been320VBNbe trying321VVGtry to322TOto unpackage323VVunpackage this324DTthis case325NNcase in326INin my327PP$my own328JJown mind329NNmind ,330,, and331CCand I332PPI start333VVPstart with334INwith the335DTthe language336NNlanguage of337INof the338DTthe statute339NNstatute .340SENT. I341PPI 'm342VBPbe sorry343JJsorry .344SENT. I345PPI interrupted346VVDinterrupt you347PPyou .348SENT. Finish349NNfinish .350SENT. [MS. BLATT]351LOC[MS. BLATT] No352NPNo ,353,, we354PPwe 're355VBPbe good356JJgood .357SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]358LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Okay359NPOkay .360SENT. [361SYM[ LAUGHTER362NNlaughter ]363SYM] [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]364LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I365PPI 'm366VBPbe sorry367JJsorry .368SENT. [MS. BLATT]369LOC[MS. BLATT] No370NPNo .371SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]372LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I373PPI am374VBPbe trying375VVGtry to376TOto figure377VVfigure out378RPout ...379:... let380VVlet 's381VBZbe assume382VVassume for383INfor the384DTthe sake385NNsake of386INof argument387NNargument that388IN/thatthat the389DTthe remedial390JJremedial plan391NNplan that392IN/thatthat the393DTthe state394NNstate court395NNcourt orders396NNSorder supplements397NNSsupplement ,398,, rather399RBrather than400INthan contradicts401VVZcontradict ,402,, the403DTthe EPA404NPEPA plan405NNplan ,406,, that407IN/thatthat it408PPit was409VBDbe something410NNsomething in411INin top412JJtop of413INof .414SENT. I415PPI read416VVPread the417DTthe savings418NNSsaving clauses419NNSclause to420TOto permit421VVpermit that422DTthat .423SENT. It424PPit ...425:... the426DTthe savings427NNSsaving clauses428NNSclause are429VBPbe very430RBvery explicit431JJexplicit that432IN/thatthat it433PPit 's434VBZbe not435RBnot displacing436VVGdisplace or437CCor intending438VVGintend to439TOto displace440VVdisplace state441NNstate law442NNlaw remedies443NNSremedy for444INfor liability445NNliability or446CCor for447INfor anything448NNanything else449RBelse .450SENT. So451RBso ,452,, if453INif these454DTthese plans455NNSplan supplement456NNsupplement ,457,, why458WRBwhy would459MDwould this460DTthis part461NNpart of462INof Montana463NPMontana law464NNlaw be465VBbe preempted466VVNpreempt ?467SENT? [MS. BLATT]468LOC[MS. BLATT] So469RBso ,470,, in471INin terms472NNSterm of473INof preemption474NNpreemption ,475,, so476RBso it477PPit 's478VBZbe quite479RBquite emphatic480JJemphatic to481TOto understand482VVunderstand that483DTthat Section484NNsection 122485CD@card@ (486(( e487LSe )488)) (489(( 6490CD6 )491)) and492CCand the493DTthe over494INover 20495CD@card@ administrative496JJadministrative orders497NNSorder impose498VVimpose both499CCboth a500DTa floor501NNfloor and502CCand a503DTa ceiling504NNceiling on505INon the506DTthe type507NNtype of508INof cleanup509NNcleanup ...510:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]511LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] If512INif I513PPI disagree514VVPdisagree that515IN/thatthat it516PPit 's517VBZbe a518DTa ceiling519NNceiling ...520:... [MS. BLATT]521LOC[MS. BLATT] Well522UHWell ...523:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]524LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...525:... if526INif I527PPI think528VVPthink it529PPit 's530VBZbe just531RBjust a532DTa flaw533NNflaw ...534:... a535DTa floor536NNfloor ...537:... [MS. BLATT]538LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure539NPSure .540SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]541LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...542:... and543CCand that544IN/thatthat the545DTthe EPA546NPEPA has547VHZhave the548DTthe power549NNpower to550TOto decide551VVdecide whether552INwhether any553DTany plan554NNplan can555MDcan supplement556VVsupplement its557PP$its own558JJown ...559:... [MS. BLATT]560LOC[MS. BLATT] Of561INof course562NNcourse .563SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]564LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...565:... where566WRBwhere does567VVZdo that568RBthat leave569VVleave this570DTthis argument571NNargument ?572SENT? [MS. BLATT]573LOC[MS. BLATT] So574INso you575PPyou ...576:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]577LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] If578INif ...579:... if580INif ...581:... if582INif ...583:... if584INif I585PPI believe586VVPbelieve ...587:... [MS. BLATT]588LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure589NPSure .590SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]591LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...592:... that593IN/thatthat it594PPit 's595VBZbe a596DTa ...597:... it598PPit 's599VBZbe a600DTa floor601NNfloor only602RBonly ,603,, not604RBnot a605DTa ceiling606NNceiling ...607:... [MS. BLATT]608LOC[MS. BLATT] Uh-huh609NPUh-huh .610SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]611LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...612:... that613IN/thatthat the614DTthe EPA615NPEPA has616VHZhave the617DTthe right618NNright to619TOto establish620VVestablish when621WRBwhen a622DTa plan623NNplan will624MDwill be625VBbe a626DTa ceiling627NNceiling ,628,, where629WRBwhere does630VVZdo that631RBthat leave632VVleave this633DTthis case634NNcase ?635SENT? [MS. BLATT]636LOC[MS. BLATT] Okay637NPOkay .638SENT. So639RBso ,640,, in641INin terms642NNSterm of643INof conflict644NNconflict preemption645NNpreemption ,646,, so647RBso we648PPwe know649VVPknow that650IN/thatthat EPA651NPEPA would652MDwould absolutely653RBabsolutely have654VHhave to655TOto change656VVchange federal657JJfederal law658NNlaw ,659,, which660WDTwhich it661PPit could662MDcould ,663,, to664TOto approve665VVapprove their666PP$their plan667NNplan .668SENT. So669RBso you670PPyou 're671VBPbe absolutely672RBabsolutely correct673JJcorrect .674SENT. The675DTthe EP676NPEP ...677:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]678LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I679PPI 'm680VBPbe sorry681JJsorry .682SENT. [MS. BLATT]683LOC[MS. BLATT] EP684NPEP ...685:... federal686JJfederal law687NNlaw requires688VVZrequire a689DTa specific690JJspecific action691NNaction level692NNlevel and693CCand a694DTa specific695JJspecific amount696NNamount of697INof dirt698NNdirt that699WDTthat can700MDcan be701VBbe dug702VVNdug and703CCand that704IN/thatthat no705DTno wall706NNwall could707MDcould be708VBbe built709VVNbuild .710SENT. If711INif that712DTthat happens713VVZhappen ,714,, EPA715NPEPA ...716:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]717LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] At718INat the719DTthe moment720NNmoment ?721SENT? [MS. BLATT]722LOC[MS. BLATT] Yes723NPYes .724SENT. And725CCand EPA726NPEPA can727MDcan change728VVchange it729PPit .730SENT. And731CCand this732DTthis Court733NPCourt in734INin Mensing735NPMensing said736VVDsay that737IN/thatthat courts738NNScourt do739VVPdo not740RBnot withhold741VVwithhold preemption742NNpreemption based743VVNbase on744INon the745DTthe speculation746NNspeculation that747IN/thatthat federal748JJfederal government749NNgovernment may750MDmay change751VVchange the752DTthe law753NNlaw .754SENT. And755CCand the756DTthe law757NNlaw would758MDwould have759VHhave to760TOto be761VBbe ...762:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]763LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But764CCbut it765PPit is766VBZbe n't767RBn't the768DTthe law769NNlaw ,770,, Ms771NNMs .772SENT. Blatt773NPBlatt .774SENT. It's775NPIt's ...776:... it777PPit 's778VBZbe the779DTthe EPA780NPEPA Superfund781NPSuperfund plan782NNplan for783INfor this784DTthis site785NNsite .786SENT. The787DTthe specific788JJspecific things789NNSthing that790IN/thatthat you791PPyou mention792VVPmention are793VBPbe not794RBnot in795INin the796DTthe law797NNlaw .798SENT. They799PPthey are800VBPbe in801INin the802DTthe EPA803NPEPA 's804POS's plan805NNplan .806SENT. And807CCand if808INif the809DTthe EPA810NPEPA said811VVDsay we812PPwe permit813VVPpermit what814WPwhat the815DTthe landowners816NNSlandowner ...817:... the818DTthe ...819:... the820DTthe further821JJRfurther cleanup822NNcleanup the823DTthe landowners824NNSlandowner want825VVPwant ,826,, we827PPwe permit828VVPpermit it829PPit or830CCor we831PPwe permit832VVPpermit what833WPwhat they834PPthey want835VVPwant with836INwith certain837JJcertain modifications838NNSmodification ,839,, if840INif EPA841NPEPA says842VVZsay yes843UHyes ,844,, then845RBthen there846EXthere 's847VBZbe no848DTno preemption849NNpreemption that850IN/thatthat I851PPI could852MDcould see853VVsee that854WDTthat would855MDwould be856VBbe involved857VVNinvolve in858INin this859DTthis case860NNcase .861SENT. [MS. BLATT]862LOC[MS. BLATT] So863INso that864WDTthat 's865VBZbe not866RBnot correct867JJcorrect because868INbecause ,869,, when870WRBwhen you871PPyou said872VVDsay plan873NNplan ...874:... and875CCand maybe876RBmaybe I877PPI misspoke878VVZmisspoke ...879:... the880DTthe law881NNlaw is882VBZbe not883RBnot a884DTa U885NPU .886SENT. S887NPS .888SENT. code889NNcode law890NNlaw .891SENT. It892PPit 's893VBZbe a894DTa binding895JJbinding administrative896JJadministrative order897NNorder where898WRBwhere Atlantic899NPAtlantic Richfield900NPRichfield would901MDwould incur902VVincur massive903JJmassive penalties904NNSpenalty every905DTevery day906NNday if907INif it908PPit violated909VVDviolate .910SENT. It911PPit 's912VBZbe a913DTa law914NNlaw in915INin terms916NNSterm of917INof an918DTan administrative919JJadministrative order920NNorder that921WDTthat sets922VVZset forth923RBforth the924DTthe plan925NNplan .926SENT. Now927RBnow Atlantic928NPAtlantic Richfield929NPRichfield cannot930MDcan carry931VVcarry out932RPout that933DTthat plan934NNplan without935INwithout massive936JJmassive fines937NNSfine and938CCand violating939VVGviolate law940NNlaw .941SENT. In942INin the943DTthe order944NNorder ,945,, it946PPit says947VVZsay undertaking948VVGundertake any949DTany action950NNaction without951INwithout EPA952NPEPA 's953POS's approval954NNapproval violates955VVZviolate the956DTthe order957NNorder .958SENT. And959CCand under960INunder ordinary961JJordinary ...962:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]963LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But964CCbut suppose965VVsuppose the966DTthe EPA967NPEPA approves968VVZapprove .969SENT. The970DTthe EPA971NPEPA says972VVZsay what973WPwhat you974PPyou want975VVPwant to976TOto do977VVdo is978VBZbe okay979JJokay with980INwith us981PPus ,982,, or983CCor at984INat least985JJSleast ,986,, as987RBas was988VBDbe suggested989VVNsuggest in990INin the991DTthe briefing992NNbriefing ,993,, part994NNpart of995INof what996WPwhat the997DTthe landowners998NNSlandowner want999VVPwant is1000VBZbe okay1001JJokay with1002INwith EPA1003NPEPA .1004SENT. [MS. BLATT]1005LOC[MS. BLATT] So1006INso all1007DTall of1008INof the1009DTthe pillars1010NNSpillar of1011INof their1012PP$their plan1013NNplan violate1014VVviolate EPA1015NPEPA 's1016POS's order1017NNorder .1018SENT. And1019CCand your1020PP$your supposition1021NNsupposition that1022IN/thatthat EPA1023NPEPA could1024MDcould approve1025VVapprove it1026PPit is1027VBZbe just1028RBjust not1029RBnot the1030DTthe test1031NNtest under1032INunder preemption1033NNpreemption .1034SENT. The1035DTthe test1036NNtest under1037INunder preemption1038NNpreemption is1039VBZbe whether1040INwhether a1041DTa party1042NNparty today1043NNtoday could1044MDcould independently1045RBindependently do1046VVdo under1047INunder federal1048JJfederal law1049NNlaw what1050WPwhat state1051VVPstate law1052NNlaw requires1053VVZrequire .1054SENT. And1055CCand I1056PPI mean1057VVPmean by1058INby that1059DTthat ,1060,, and1061CCand what1062WPwhat this1063DTthis Court1064NPCourt in1065INin Mensing1066NPMensing and1067CCand Bartlett1068NPBartlett said1069VVDsay ,1070,, that1071WDTthat means1072VVZmean complying1073VVGcomply with1074INwith state1075NNstate law1076NNlaw duties1077NNSduty without1078INwithout the1079DTthe government1080NNgovernment 's1081POS's assistance1082NNassistance and1083CCand permission1084NNpermission .1085SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]1086LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well1087UHWell ,1088,, Ms1089NNMs .1090SENT. Blatt1091NPBlatt ,1092,, same1093JJsame kind1094NNkind of1095INof question1096NNquestion ,1097,, and1098CCand maybe1099RBmaybe it1100PPit goes1101VVZgo to1102TOto a1103DTa bunch1104NNbunch of1105INof your1106PP$your arguments1107NNSargument .1108SENT. I1109PPI mean1110VVPmean ,1111,, look1112VVPlook ,1113,, if1114INif I1115PPI were1116VBDbe writing1117VVGwrite this1118DTthis statute1119NNstatute ,1120,, I1121PPI would1122MDwould say1123VVsay it1124PPit all1125RBall goes1126VVZgo to1127TOto the1128DTthe EPA1129NPEPA .1130SENT. It1131PPit 's1132VBZbe just1133RBjust ...1134:... you1135PPyou know1136VVPknow ,1137,, that1138WDTthat 's1139VBZbe the1140DTthe sensible1141JJsensible solution1142NNsolution to1143TOto have1144VHhave one1145CDone party1146NNparty that1147WDTthat makes1148VVZmake all1149PDTall the1150DTthe rules1151NNSrule in1152INin this1153DTthis .1154SENT. But1155CCbut I1156PPI 'm1157VBPbe not1158RBnot writing1159VVGwrite the1160DTthe statute1161NNstatute .1162SENT. And1163CCand the1164DTthe statute1165NNstatute has1166VHZhave three1167CDthree savings1168NNSsaving clauses1169NNSclause in1170INin it1171PPit ,1172,, which1173WDTwhich ...1174:... which1175WDTwhich suggests1176VVZsuggest that1177IN/thatthat the1178DTthe states1179NNSstate have1180VHPhave a1181DTa significant1182JJsignificant role1183NNrole in1184INin this1185DTthis .1186SENT. And1187CCand ,1188,, in1189INin particular1190JJparticular ,1191,, one1192CDone that1193WDTthat says1194VVZsay that1195IN/thatthat the1196DTthe states1197NNSstate get1198VVPget to1199TOto impose1200VVimpose additional1201JJadditional liability1202NNliability or1203CCor requirements1204NNSrequirement with1205INwith respect1206NNrespect to1207TOto the1208DTthe release1209NNrelease of1210INof hazardous1211JJhazardous substances1212NNSsubstance .1213SENT. And1214CCand I1215PPI guess1216VVPguess ,1217,, you1218PPyou know1219VVPknow ,1220,, one1221CDone way1222NNway into1223INinto this1224DTthis is1225VBZbe if1226INif I1227PPI ...1228:... if1229INif ...1230:... if1231INif ...1232:... if1233INif we1234PPwe imagine1235VVPimagine that1236IN/thatthat this1237DTthis was1238VBDbe done1239VVNdo not1240RBnot with1241INwith a1242DTa damages1243NNSdamage rule1244NNrule ,1245,, but1246CCbut suppose1247VVPsuppose the1248DTthe Montana1249NPMontana legislature1250NNlegislature just1251RBjust said1252VVDsay ,1253,, you1254PPyou know1255VVPknow what1256WPwhat ,1257,, this1258DTthis plan1259NNplan that1260IN/thatthat the1261DTthe EPA1262NPEPA has1263VHZhave put1264VVNput in1265INin place1266NNplace ,1267,, it1268PPit requires1269VVZrequire arsenic1270NNarsenic at1271INat a1272DTa certain1273JJcertain level1274NNlevel ,1275,, and1276CCand we1277PPwe think1278VVPthink it1279PPit would1280MDwould be1281VBbe better1282JJRgood to1283TOto lower1284VVlower that1285IN/thatthat ,1286,, and1287CCand we1288PPwe do1289VVPdo n't1290RBn't really1291RBreally care1292VVcare that1293IN/thatthat the1294DTthe EPA1295NPEPA thinks1296VVZthink that1297IN/thatthat that1298DTthat would1299MDwould not1300RBnot be1301VBbe a1302DTa good1303JJgood idea1304NNidea for1305INfor health1306NNhealth purposes1307NNSpurpose ,1308,, as1309RBas well1310RBwell as1311INas for1312INfor economic1313JJeconomic purposes1314NNSpurpose ;1315:; we1316PPwe think1317VVPthink that1318IN/thatthat that1319DTthat arsenic1320JJarsenic level1321NNlevel should1322MDshould be1323VBbe lowered1324VVNlower .1325SENT. Do1326VVPdo you1327PPyou think1328VVPthink that1329IN/thatthat the1330DTthe state1331NNstate gets1332VVZget to1333TOto do1334VVdo that1335DTthat ?1336SENT? [MS. BLATT]1337LOC[MS. BLATT] No1338NPNo ,1339,, and1340CCand Section1341NPSection 1211342CD@card@ deals1343NNSdeal with1344INwith this1345DTthis directly1346RBdirectly .1347SENT. It1348PPit spells1349VVZspell out1350RPout in1351INin like1352INlike over1353RBover 3,0001354CD@card@ words1355NNSword how1356WRBhow states1357NNSstate can1358MDcan incorporate1359VVincorporate into1360INinto EPA's1361NPEPA's ,1362,, their1363PP$their plans1364NNSplan ,1365,, and1366CCand EPA1367NPEPA can1368MDcan override1369VVoverride that1370DTthat state1371NNstate standard1372NNstandard .1373SENT. And1374CCand it1375PPit goes1376VVZgo ...1377:... then1378RBthen states1379NNSstate have1380VHPhave the1381DTthe remedy1382NNremedy to1383TOto sue1384VVsue .1385SENT. It1386PPit 's1387VBZbe one1388CDone of1389INof the1390DTthe exceptions1391NNSexception under1392INunder 1131393CD@card@ .1394SENT. And1395CCand so1396RBso ...1397:... and1398CCand I1399PPI think1400VVPthink you1401PPyou 're1402VBPbe right1403JJright that1404IN/thatthat their1405PP$their position1406NNposition under1407INunder the1408DTthe savings1409NNSsaving clause1410NNclause is1411VBZbe that1412IN/thatthat not1413RBnot only1414RBonly could1415MDcould state1416VVstate law1417NNlaw say1418VVPsay do1419VVPdo n't1420RBn't enact1421VVenact EPA1422NPEPA 's1423POS's remedy1424NNremedy because1425INbecause we1426PPwe hate1427VVPhate it1428PPit and1429CCand do1430VVPdo a1431DTa different1432JJdifferent remedy1433NNremedy ,1434,, but1435CCbut state1436NNstate courts1437NNScourt could1438MDcould order1439VVorder independent1440JJindependent warring1441VVGwar cleanups1442NNScleanup ,1443,, you1444PPyou know1445VVPknow ,1446,, case1447NNcase by1448INby case1449NNcase ,1450,, block1451NNblock by1452INby block1453NNblock ,1454,, house1455NNhouse by1456INby house1457NNhouse .1458SENT. And1459CCand this1460DTthis Court1461NPCourt ,1462,, in1463INin the1464DTthe Abilene1465NPAbilene Cotton1466NPCotton case1467NNcase and1468CCand in1469INin the1470DTthe AT1471INat &1472CC& T1473NNT case1474NNcase ,1475,, interpreted1476VVDinterpret almost1477RBalmost an1478DTan identically1479RBidentically worded1480VVNword savings1481NNSsaving clause1482NNclause and1483CCand said1484VVDsay you1485PPyou can1486MDcan 't1487RB't interpret1488VVinterpret those1489DTthose clauses1490NNSclause to1491TOto completely1492RBcompletely destroy1493VVdestroy other1494JJother parts1495NNSpart of1496INof the1497DTthe Act1498NPAct .1499SENT. And1500CCand this1501DTthis would1502MDwould utterly1503RButterly destroy1504VVdestroy EPA1505NPEPA 's1506POS's whole1507JJwhole design1508NNdesign under1509INunder CERCLA1510NPCERCLA .1511SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]1512LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] So1513RBso ...1514:... so1515RBso what1516WPwhat ...1517:... what1518WPwhat do1519VVPdo they1520PPthey save1521VVsave then1522RBthen ?1523SENT? I1524PPI mean1525VVPmean ,1526,, the1527DTthe savings1528NNsavings is1529VBZbe all1530RBall over1531INover this1532DTthis statute1533NNstatute .1534SENT. They1535PPthey have1536VHPhave to1537TOto save1538VVsave something1539NNsomething .1540SENT. What1541WPWhat do1542VVPdo they1543PPthey save1544VVsave that1545DTthat ...1546:... that1547IN/thatthat states1548NNSstate can1549MDcan do1550VVdo independently1551RBindependently ?1552SENT? [MS. BLATT]1553LOC[MS. BLATT] So1554RBso let1555VVlet ...1556:... let1557VVlet me1558PPme be1559VBbe very1560RBvery clear1561JJclear how1562WRBhow narrow1563JJnarrow our1564PP$our argument1565NNargument is1566VBZbe .1567SENT. They1568PPthey have1569VHPhave four1570CDfour ...1571:... four1572CDfour claims1573NNSclaim of1574INof compensatory1575JJcompensatory damages1576NNSdamage and1577CCand punitive1578JJpunitive damages1579NNSdamage .1580SENT. So1581INso typical1582JJtypical state1583NNstate law1584NNlaw claims1585NNSclaim for1586INfor nuisance1587JJnuisance and1588CCand whatever1589WDTwhatever else1590NNelse they1591PPthey want1592VVPwant to1593TOto claim1594VVclaim for1595INfor damages1596NNSdamage is1597VBZbe fine1598JJfine .1599SENT. The1600DTthe objection1601NNobjection here1602RBhere is1603VBZbe that1604IN/thatthat the1605DTthe actual1606JJactual remedy1607NNremedy orders1608NNSorder Atlantic1609NPAtlantic Richfield1610NPRichfield to1611TOto pay1612VVpay Respondents1613NNSrespondent to1614TOto carry1615VVcarry out1616RPout their1617PP$their contrary1618JJcontrary plan1619NNplan and1620CCand that1621IN/thatthat Respondents1622NNSrespondent under1623INunder state1624NNstate law1625NNlaw must1626MDmust actually1627RBactually implement1628VVimplement the1629DTthe very1630JJvery plan1631NNplan that1632IN/thatthat Atlantic1633NPAtlantic Richfield1634NPRichfield would1635MDwould violate1636VVviolate federal1637JJfederal law1638NNlaw .1639SENT. So1640RBso this1641DTthis is1642VBZbe a1643DTa ...1644:... not1645RBnot only1646RBonly a1647DTa challenge1648NNchallenge and1649CCand not1650RBnot only1651RBonly its1652PP$its direct1653JJdirect remedial1654JJremedial action1655NNaction that1656WDTthat has1657VHZhave to1658TOto be1659VBbe taken1660VVNtake in1661INin violation1662NNviolation of1663INof 1221664CD@card@ ,1665,, but1666CCbut it1667PPit 's1668VBZbe the1669DTthe only1670JJonly claim1671NNclaim that1672WDTthat would1673MDwould meet1674VVmeet our1675PP$our standard1676NNstandard of1677INof conflict1678NNconflict preemption1679NNpreemption because1680INbecause it1681PPit requires1682VVZrequire Atlantic1683NPAtlantic Richfield1684NPRichfield to1685TOto effectuate1686VVeffectuate a1687DTa violation1688NNviolation of1689INof federal1690JJfederal law1691NNlaw ,1692,, either1693CCeither whether1694INwhether they1695PPthey hire1696VVPhire their1697PP$their own1698JJown employees1699NNSemployee or1700CCor whether1701INwhether they1702PPthey hire1703VVPhire the1704DTthe plaintiff1705NNplaintiff 's1706POS's employees1707NNSemployee and1708CCand put1709VVput a1710DTa different1711JJdifferent hard1712JJhard hat1713NNhat or1714CCor give1715VVgive them1716PPthem a1717DTa different1718JJdifferent ...1719:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1720LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Ms1721NNMs .1722SENT. Blatt1723NPBlatt ...1724:... [MS. BLATT]1725LOC[MS. BLATT] ...1726:... shovel1727NNshovel .1728SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1729LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...1730:... if1731INif ...1732:... if1733INif I1734PPI have1735VHPhave questions1736NNSquestion about1737INabout what1738WPwhat state1739NNstate law1740NNlaw requires1741VVZrequire ,1742,, because1743INbecause I1744PPI ...1745:... I1746PPI can1747MDcan 't1748RB't find1749VVfind anything1750NNanything in1751INin the1752DTthe state1753NNstate law1754NNlaw that1755WDTthat requires1756VVZrequire a1757DTa damages1758NNSdamage remedy1759VVPremedy to1760TOto be1761VBbe put1762VVNput in1763INin trust1764NNtrust for1765INfor the1766DTthe remediation1767NNremediation ,1768,, that1769WDTthat 's1770VBZbe what1771WPwhat the1772DTthe court1773NNcourt below1774RBbelow said1775VVDsay .1776SENT. I1777PPI know1778VVPknow that1779DTthat 's1780VBZbe what1781WPwhat it1782PPit said1783VVDsay .1784SENT. But1785CCbut I1786PPI can1787MDcan 't1788RB't find1789VVfind any1790DTany law1791NNlaw that1792WDTthat says1793VVZsay that1794DTthat 's1795VBZbe what1796WPwhat has1797VHZhave to1798TOto happen1799VVhappen ...1800:... [MS. BLATT]1801LOC[MS. BLATT] Uh-huh1802NPUh-huh .1803SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1804LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...1805:... number1806NNnumber one1807CDone .1808SENT. Number1809NNnumber two1810CDtwo ,1811,, I1812PPI can1813MDcan 't1814RB't find1815VVfind any1816DTany state1817NNstate law1818NNlaw requirement1819NNrequirement that1820IN/thatthat the1821DTthe Petitioner1822NNpetitioner has1823VHZhave to1824TOto prove1825VVprove that1826IN/thatthat they1827PPthey 're1828VBPbe going1829VVGgo to1830TOto actually1831RBactually use1832VVuse the1833DTthe money1834NNmoney they1835PPthey 're1836VBPbe awarded1837VVNaward for1838INfor the1839DTthe purposes1840NNSpurpose that1841WDTthat they1842PPthey claim1843VVPclaim .1844SENT. So1845RBso I1846PPI 'm1847VBPbe very1848RBvery confused1849VVNconfuse about1850INabout the1851DTthe state1852NNstate law1853NNlaw question1854NNquestion .1855SENT. [MS. BLATT]1856LOC[MS. BLATT] Yeah1857NPYeah .1858SENT. And1859CCand I1860PPI think1861VVPthink that1862WDTthat 's1863VBZbe all1864PDTall a1865DTa fair1866JJfair question1867NNquestion .1868SENT. And1869CCand ...1870:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1871LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] If1872INif it1873PPit is1874VBZbe a1875DTa fair1876JJfair question1877NNquestion ...1878:... [MS. BLATT]1879LOC[MS. BLATT] Yeah1880UHYeah ,1881,, I1882PPI was1883VBDbe going1884VVGgo to1885TOto answer1886VVanswer it1887PPit .1888SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1889LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...1890:... why1891WRBwhy is1892VBZbe it1893PPit preempted1894VVDpreempt ,1895,, meaning1896VVGmean why1897WRBwhy would1898MDwould n't1899RBn't I1900PPI just1901RBjust remand1902VVPremand this1903DTthis case1904NNcase and1905CCand say1906VVPsay you1907PPyou can1908MDcan 't1909RB't make1910VVmake ...1911:... you1912PPyou can1913MDcan 't1914RB't award1915NNaward damages1916NNSdamage unless1917INunless the1918DTthe other1919JJother side1920NNside proves1921VVZprove or1922CCor the1923DTthe side1924NNside claiming1925VVGclaim these1926DTthese damages1927NNSdamage proves1928VVZprove that1929IN/thatthat it1930PPit can1931MDcan get1932VVget EPA1933NPEPA approval1934NNapproval of1935INof whatever1936WDTwhatever it1937PPit wants1938VVZwant to1939TOto do1940VVdo ,1941,, and1942CCand that1943IN/thatthat it1944PPit will1945MDwill ,1946,, in1947INin fact1948NNfact ,1949,, only1950RBonly use1951VVuse that1952DTthat award1953NNaward for1954INfor those1955DTthose purposes1956NNSpurpose ?1957SENT? [MS. BLATT]1958LOC[MS. BLATT] Right1959RBright .1960SENT. So1961RBso ...1962:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1963LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] What1964WPWhat 's1965VBZbe wrong1966JJwrong with1967INwith a1968DTa ruling1969NNruling that1970WDTthat 's1971VBZbe just1972RBjust that1973DTthat basic1974NNbasic that1975WDTthat says1976VVZsay you1977PPyou can1978MDcan get1979VVget more1980JJRmore if1981INif you1982PPyou can1983MDcan prove1984VVprove the1985DTthe EPA1986NPEPA will1987MDwill give1988VVgive you1989PPyou more1990JJRmore ,1991,, as1992RBas simple1993JJsimple as1994INas that1995DTthat ?1996SENT? [MS. BLATT]1997LOC[MS. BLATT] So1998INso you1999PPyou know2000VVPknow ...2001:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2002LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] What2003WPWhat 's2004VBZbe wrong2005JJwrong with2006INwith that2007DTthat ...2008:... [MS. BLATT]2009LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure2010NPSure .2011SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2012LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...2013:... kind2014NNkind of2015INof opinion2016NNopinion ?2017SENT? [MS. BLATT]2018LOC[MS. BLATT] So2019INso you2020PPyou took2021VVDtake this2022DTthis case2023NNcase on2024INon the2025DTthe assumption2026NNassumption ...2027:... and2028CCand we2029PPwe cite2030VVPcite it2031PPit on2032INon page2033NNpage 162034CD@card@ of2035INof our2036PP$our reply2037NNreply brief2038NNbrief ...2039:... all2040PDTall the2041DTthe places2042NNSplace where2043WRBwhere the2044DTthe Respondent2045NNrespondent concedes2046VVZconcede ,2047,, and2048CCand the2049DTthe Montana2050NPMontana Supreme2051NPSupreme Court2052NPCourt expressly2053RBexpressly said2054VVDsay ,2055,, that2056IN/thatthat this2057DTthis money2058NNmoney has2059VHZhave to2060TOto be2061VBbe used2062VVNuse to2063TOto carry2064VVcarry out2065RPout the2066DTthe remedy2067NNremedy .2068SENT. And2069CCand that2070DTthat 's2071VBZbe the2072DTthe way2073NNway this2074DTthis case2075NNcase comes2076VVZcome up2077RPup .2078SENT. If2079INif you2080PPyou want2081VVPwant to2082TOto know2083VVknow the2084DTthe reason2085NNreason for2086INfor Sunburst2087NNsunburst ,2088,, it2089PPit 's2090VBZbe because2091INbecause of2092INof the2093DTthe reason2094NNreason is2095VBZbe personal2096JJpersonal .2097SENT. So2098RBso ,2099,, if2100INif you2101PPyou own2102VVPown a2103DTa property2104NNproperty and2105CCand love2106VVlove it2107PPit so2108RBso much2109RBmuch and2110CCand you2111PPyou do2112VVPdo n't2113RBn't have2114VHhave any2115DTany damages2116NNSdamage ,2117,, the2118DTthe whole2119JJwhole point2120NNpoint of2121INof the2122DTthe restoration2123NNrestoration remedy2124NNremedy to2125TOto avoid2126VVavoid the2127DTthe windfall2128NNwindfall is2129VBZbe you2130PPyou have2131VHPhave to2132TOto spend2133VVspend the2134DTthe money2135NNmoney .2136SENT. So2137RBso I2138PPI 'm2139VBPbe quite2140RBquite confident2141JJconfident that2142IN/thatthat I2143PPI 'm2144VBPbe accurately2145RBaccurately stating2146VVGstate Montana2147NPMontana law2148NNlaw and2149CCand that2150IN/thatthat Respondents2151NNSrespondent never2152RBnever argued2153VVDargue to2154TOto the2155DTthe contrary2156NNcontrary .2157SENT. And2158CCand in2159INin our2160PP$our reply2161NNreply brief2162NNbrief ,2163,, again2164RBagain ,2165,, we2166PPwe cite2167VVPcite all2168PDTall the2169DTthe concessions2170NNSconcession ,2171,, including2172VVGinclude ,2173,, I2174PPI think2175VVPthink ,2176,, the2177DTthe opinion2178NNopinion below2179INbelow in2180INin three2181CDthree places2182NNSplace says2183VVZsay the2184DTthe money2185NNmoney has2186VHZhave to2187TOto go2188VVgo to2189TOto a2190DTa trustee2191NNtrustee and2192CCand that2193IN/thatthat money2194NNmoney has2195VHZhave to2196TOto be2197VBbe spent2198VVNspend on2199INon the2200DTthe cleanup2201NNcleanup .2202SENT. And2203CCand I2204PPI 'm2205VBPbe agreeing2206VVGagree with2207INwith you2208PPyou that2209IN/thatthat key2210JJkey to2211TOto the2212DTthe preemption2213NNpreemption argument2214NNargument is2215VBZbe that2216IN/thatthat under2217INunder state2218NNstate law2219NNlaw ,2220,, they2221PPthey will2222MDwill be2223VBbe forced2224VVNforce to2225TOto carry2226VVcarry out2227RPout a2228DTa remedy2229NNremedy that2230WDTthat would2231MDwould violate2232VVviolate EPA2233NPEPA 's2234POS's orders2235NNSorder ,2236,, these2237DTthese administrative2238JJadministrative orders2239NNSorder ,2240,, if2241INif we2242PPwe carried2243VVDcarry it2244PPit out2245INout itself2246PPitself .2247SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2248LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So2249INso what2250WPwhat 's2251VBZbe wrong2252JJwrong with2253INwith an2254DTan opinion2255NNopinion that2256IN/thatthat we2257PPwe write2258VVPwrite that2259DTthat says2260VVZsay what2261WPwhat you2262PPyou 're2263VBPbe missing2264VVGmiss is2265VBZbe the2266DTthe next2267JJnext step2268NNstep .2269SENT. You2270PPyou have2271VHPhave to2272TOto be2273VBbe able2274JJable to2275TOto show2276VVshow that2277IN/thatthat that2278DTthat remediation2279NNremediation will2280MDwill be2281VBbe approved2282VVNapprove .2283SENT. [MS. BLATT]2284LOC[MS. BLATT] Yeah2285NPYeah .2286SENT. So2287RBso ...2288:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2289LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So2290RBso ,2291,, if2292INif ...2293:... if2294INif that2295WDTthat 's2296VBZbe their2297PP$their burden2298NNburden ,2299,, why2300WRBwhy do2301VVPdo we2302PPwe need2303VVPneed to2304TOto go2305VVgo any2306DTany further2307RBRfurther ?2308SENT? [MS. BLATT]2309LOC[MS. BLATT] So2310INso I2311PPI ...2312:... two2313CDtwo responses2314NNSresponse .2315SENT. So2316RBso ,2317,, right2318RBright now2319RBnow ,2320,, they2321PPthey do2322VVPdo n't2323RBn't have2324VHhave federal2325JJfederal permission2326NNpermission .2327SENT. And2328CCand under2329INunder Section2330NPSection 1222331CD@card@ ,2332,, you2333PPyou have2334VHPhave to2335TOto take2336VVtake federal2337JJfederal ...2338:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2339LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I2340PPI did2341VVDdo n't2342RBn't say2343VVsay ...2344:... [MS. BLATT]2345LOC[MS. BLATT] We2346PPwe 're2347VBPbe talking2348VVGtalk about2349RBabout ...2350:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2351LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...2352:... they2353PPthey have2354VHPhave to2355TOto show2356VVshow that2357IN/thatthat they2358PPthey will2359MDwill get2360VVget EPA2361NPEPA approval2362NNapproval .2363SENT. [MS. BLATT]2364LOC[MS. BLATT] And2365CCand all2366RBall I2367PPI 'm2368VBPbe saying2369VVGsay is2370VBZbe you2371PPyou know2372VVPknow today2373NNtoday .2374SENT. Let2375VVlet me2376PPme just2377RBjust make2378VVPmake one2379CDone other2380JJother point2381NNpoint as2382INas a2383DTa practical2384JJpractical matter2385NNmatter .2386SENT. This2387DTthis is2388VBZbe not2389RBnot a2390DTa case2391NNcase in2392INin its2393PP$its infancy2394NNinfancy .2395SENT. It2396PPit was2397VBDbe cooked2398VVNcook .2399SENT. It2400PPit was2401VBDbe about2402RBabout to2403TOto go2404VVgo to2405TOto trial2406NNtrial .2407SENT. It2408PPit was2409VBDbe three2410CDthree weeks2411NNSweek away2412RBaway from2413INfrom jury2414NNjury selection2415NNselection when2416WRBwhen the2417DTthe court2418NNcourt got2419VVDget stayed2420VVNstay .2421SENT. We2422PPwe know2423VVPknow they2424PPthey 're2425VBPbe going2426VVGgo to2427TOto trial2428NNtrial and2429CCand the2430DTthe whole2431JJwhole case2432NNcase is2433VBZbe about2434RBabout whether2435INwhether a2436DTa different2437JJdifferent remedy2438NNremedy should2439MDshould be2440VBbe put2441VVNput on2442RPon .2443SENT. And2444CCand we2445PPwe know2446VVPknow under2447INunder state2448NNstate law2449NNlaw ,2450,, because2451INbecause they2452PPthey 've2453VHPhave conceded2454VVNconcede it2455PPit ,2456,, that2457IN/thatthat they2458PPthey have2459VHPhave to2460TOto carry2461VVcarry out2462RPout that2463DTthat remedy2464NNremedy .2465SENT. And2466CCand we2467PPwe know2468VVPknow they2469PPthey do2470VVPdo n't2471RBn't have2472VHhave EPA2473NPEPA 's2474POS's permission2475NNpermission .2476SENT. So2477RBso you2478PPyou not2479RBnot only2480RBonly know2481VVknow two2482CDtwo things2483NNSthing .2484SENT. You2485PPyou know2486VVPknow ,2487,, again2488RBagain ,2489,, it2490PPit 's2491VBZbe conceded2492VVNconcede that2493IN/thatthat the2494DTthe remedy2495NNremedy seeks2496VVZseek something2497NNsomething different2498JJdifferent ,2499,, and2500CCand it2501PPit would2502MDwould require2503VVrequire a2504DTa change2505NNchange in2506INin federal2507JJfederal law2508NNlaw .2509SENT. And2510CCand you2511PPyou know2512VVPknow they2513PPthey never2514RBnever got2515VVDget EPA2516NPEPA 's2517POS's permission2518NNpermission .2519SENT. And2520CCand I2521PPI guess2522VVPguess this2523DTthis is2524VBZbe assuming2525VVGassume we2526PPwe 're2527VBPbe not2528RBnot even2529RBeven getting2530VVGget ...2531:... [JUSTICE BREYER]2532LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] The2533DTthe answer2534NNanswer ...2535:... the2536DTthe answer2537NNanswer ,2538,, I2539PPI think2540VVPthink ,2541,, is2542VBZbe this2543DTthis right2544NNright ,2545,, to2546TOto the2547DTthe question2548NNquestion ,2549,, which2550WDTwhich is2551VBZbe a2552DTa question2553NNquestion I2554PPI had2555VHDhave ,2556,, too2557RBtoo ,2558,, is2559VBZbe that2560IN/thatthat in2561INin order2562NNorder to2563TOto bring2564VVbring an2565DTan action2566NNaction where2567WRBwhere the2568DTthe result2569NNresult will2570MDwill be2571VBbe an2572DTan order2573NNorder to2574TOto do2575VVdo certain2576JJcertain things2577NNSthing ,2578,, dig2579NNdig dirt2580NNdirt or2581CCor do2582VVdo physical2583JJphysical things2584NNSthing ,2585,, if2586INif they2587PPthey are2588VBPbe a2589DTa potentially2590RBpotentially responsible2591JJresponsible party2592NNparty ,2593,, they2594PPthey have2595VHPhave to2596TOto show2597VVshow not2598RBnot that2599IN/thatthat EPA2600NPEPA might2601MDmight approve2602VVapprove it2603PPit ,2604,, but2605CCbut what2606WPwhat it2607PPit says2608VVZsay is2609VBZbe unless2610INunless such2611JJsuch remedial2612JJremedial action2613NNaction ,2614,, which2615WDTwhich is2616VBZbe the2617DTthe reaction2618NNreaction they2619PPthey 're2620VBPbe seeking2621VVGseek ,2622,, has2623VHZhave been2624VBNbe authorized2625VVNauthorize by2626INby EPA2627NPEPA .2628SENT. [MS. BLATT]2629LOC[MS. BLATT] And2630CCand you2631PPyou know2632VVPknow today2633NNtoday that2634WDTthat ...2635:... [JUSTICE BREYER]2636LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] It2637PPit has2638VHZhave not2639RBnot .2640SENT. [MS. BLATT]2641LOC[MS. BLATT] ...2642:... not2643RBnot only2644RBonly has2645VHZhave it2646PPit not2647RBnot been2648VBNbe ,2649,, they2650PPthey never2651RBnever ask2652VVPask EPA2653NPEPA .2654SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2655LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And2656CCand ,2657,, therefore2658RBtherefore ,2659,, what2660WPwhat we2661PPwe should2662MDshould do2663VVdo if2664INif you2665PPyou are2666VBPbe right2667RBright on2668INon the2669DTthe potentially2670RBpotentially responsible2671JJresponsible party2672NNparty is2673VBZbe we2674PPwe should2675MDshould send2676VVsend it2677PPit back2678RBback and2679CCand say2680VVPsay they2681PPthey have2682VHPhave to2683TOto get2684VVget that2685DTthat permission2686NNpermission from2687INfrom EPA2688NPEPA .2689SENT. And2690CCand there2691EXthere is2692VBZbe no2693DTno need2694NNneed to2695TOto answer2696VVanswer the2697DTthe other2698JJother questions2699NNSquestion .2700SENT. Is2701VBZbe that2702IN/thatthat right2703JJright or2704CCor wrong2705JJwrong ?2706SENT? [MS. BLATT]2707LOC[MS. BLATT] That2708DTthat 's2709VBZbe wrong2710JJwrong and2711CCand I2712PPI disagree2713VVPdisagree .2714SENT. You2715PPyou already2716RBalready know2717VVPknow today2718NNtoday they2719PPthey do2720VVPdo n't2721RBn't have2722VHhave it2723PPit .2724SENT. And2725CCand just2726RBjust as2727INas the2728DTthe case2729NNcase sits2730VVZsit today2731NNtoday ,2732,, whether2733INwhether they2734PPthey could2735MDcould have2736VHhave brought2737VVNbring some2738DTsome separate2739JJseparate federal2740JJfederal lawsuit2741NNlawsuit after2742INafter they2743PPthey asked2744VVDask EPA2745NPEPA ...2746:... excuse2747VVexcuse me2748PPme ,2749,, state2750NNstate lawsuit2751NNlawsuit ,2752,, but2753CCbut you2754PPyou already2755RBalready know2756VVPknow today2757NNtoday that2758IN/thatthat they2759PPthey never2760RBnever asked2761VVDask for2762INfor it2763PPit .2764SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2765LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah2766NPYeah .2767SENT. That2768DTthat 's2769VBZbe why2770WRBwhy I2771PPI say2772VVPsay we2773PPwe 'd2774MDwould send2775VVsend it2776PPit back2777RBback ,2778,, they2779PPthey do2780VVPdo not2781RBnot meet2782VVmeet that2783DTthat requirement2784NNrequirement if2785INif they2786PPthey are2787VBPbe potentially2788RBpotentially responsible2789JJresponsible parties2790NNSparty ,2791,, so2792RBso dismiss2793VVdismiss the2794DTthe case2795NNcase .2796SENT. Now2797RBnow ,2798,, if2799INif that2800DTthat ...2801:... if2802INif you2803PPyou win2804VVPwin in2805INin that2806DTthat respect2807NNrespect ,2808,, I2809PPI 'm2810VBPbe asking2811VVGask if2812INif there2813EXthere is2814VBZbe a2815DTa need2816NNneed to2817TOto reach2818VVreach the2819DTthe other2820JJother two2821CDtwo questions2822NNSquestion .2823SENT. [MS. BLATT]2824LOC[MS. BLATT] Okay2825NPOkay .2826SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2827LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I2828PPI suspect2829VVPsuspect there2830EXthere is2831VBZbe n't2832RBn't ,2833,, but2834CCbut am2835VBPbe I2836PPI right2837JJright ?2838SENT? [MS. BLATT]2839LOC[MS. BLATT] Yes2840NPYes .2841SENT. If2842INif you2843PPyou rule2844VVPrule for2845INfor us2846PPus under2847INunder Section2848NPSection 1222849CD@card@ that2850IN/thatthat they2851PPthey can2852MDcan 't2853RB't carry2854VVcarry out2855RPout their2856PP$their restoration2857NNrestoration remedy2858NNremedy because2859INbecause they2860PPthey do2861VVPdo n't2862RBn't have2863VHhave EPA2864NPEPA 's2865POS's permission2866NNpermission ,2867,, then2868RBthen that2869DTthat 's2870VBZbe sufficient2871JJsufficient to2872TOto resolve2873VVresolve the2874DTthe case2875NNcase .2876SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2877LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Fine2878NPFine .2879SENT. Now2880RBnow they2881PPthey say2882VVPsay they2883PPthey are2884VBPbe not2885RBnot potentially2886RBpotentially responsible2887JJresponsible parties2888NNSparty ,2889,, but2890CCbut you2891PPyou say2892VVPsay they2893PPthey are2894VBPbe .2895SENT. Why2896WRBwhy ?2897SENT? [MS. BLATT]2898LOC[MS. BLATT] Because2899INbecause in2900INin three2901CDthree ...2902:... because2903INbecause they2904PPthey are2905VBPbe landowners2906NNSlandowner with2907INwith ...2908:... with2909INwith hazardous2910JJhazardous waste2911NNwaste on2912INon a2913DTa Superfund2914NPSuperfund site2915NNsite .2916SENT. And2917CCand three2918CDthree provisions2919NNSprovision textually2920RBtextually equate2921VVPequate all2922DTall persons2923NNSperson who2924WPwho are2925VBPbe owners2926NNSowner and2927CCand operators2928NNSoperator under2929INunder 1072930CD@card@ because2931INbecause they2932PPthey own2933VVPown land2934NNland on2935INon a2936DTa Superfund2937NPSuperfund site2938NNsite .2939SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2940LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But2941CCbut they2942PPthey say2943VVPsay they2944PPthey are2945VBPbe not2946RBnot potentially2947RBpotentially responsible2948JJresponsible .2949SENT. Perhaps2950RBperhaps they2951PPthey were2952VBDbe potentially2953RBpotentially responsible2954JJresponsible ,2955,, but2956CCbut they2957PPthey are2958VBPbe not2959RBnot potentially2960RBpotentially responsible2961JJresponsible because2962INbecause EPA2963NPEPA and2964CCand everybody2965NNeverybody else2966RBelse has2967VHZhave told2968VVNtell them2969PPthem they2970PPthey 're2971VBPbe not2972RBnot responsible2973JJresponsible .2974SENT. [MS. BLATT]2975LOC[MS. BLATT] So2976RBso no2977RBno ,2978,, and2979CCand here2980RBhere is2981VBZbe why2982WRBwhy :2983:: Potentially2984RBpotentially responsible2985JJresponsible parties2986NNSparty has2987VHZhave always2988RBalways been2989VBNbe understood2990VVNunderstand by2991INby this2992DTthis Court2993NPCourt and2994CCand everyone2995NNeveryone else2996RBelse as2997INas a2998DTa status2999NNstatus ,3000,, not3001RBnot whether3002INwhether you3003PPyou could3004MDcould be3005VBbe liable3006JJliable .3007SENT. And3008CCand their3009PP$their rule3010NNrule that3011WDTthat says3012VVZsay could3013MDcould you3014PPyou be3015VBbe liable3016JJliable at3017INat any3018DTany given3019VVNgive point3020NNpoint in3021INin time3022NNtime is3023VBZbe not3024RBnot only3025RBonly unheard3026JJunheard of3027INof ,3028,, it3029PPit 's3030VBZbe unworkable3031JJunworkable ,3032,, because3033INbecause you3034PPyou would3035MDwould never3036RBnever know3037VVknow whether3038INwhether a3039DTa court3040NNcourt would3041MDwould accept3042VVaccept a3043DTa defense3044NNdefense ,3045,, including3046VVGinclude ...3047:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3048LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Whether3049INwhether they3050PPthey were3051VBDbe or3052CCor they3053PPthey were3054VBDbe n't3055RBn't potentially3056RBpotentially responsible3057JJresponsible parties3058NNSparty ,3059,, they3060PPthey are3061VBPbe landowners3062NNSlandowner ,3063,, correct3064JJcorrect ?3065SENT? And3066CCand do3067VVPdo I3068PPI understand3069VVPunderstand correctly3070RBcorrectly ,3071,, whether3072INwhether they3073PPthey 're3074VBPbe PRPs3075NNSPRPs or3076CCor not3077RBnot ,3078,, if3079INif they3080PPthey 're3081VBPbe landowners3082NNSlandowner ,3083,, they3084PPthey can3085MDcan 't3086RB't take3087VVtake any3088DTany ...3089:... they3090PPthey can3091MDcan 't3092RB't make3093VVmake any3094DTany change3095NNchange without3096INwithout EPA3097NPEPA approval3098NNapproval ?3099SENT? [MS. BLATT]3100LOC[MS. BLATT] They3101PPthey can3102MDcan 't3103RB't take3104VVtake a3105DTa statutorily3106RBstatutorily defined3107VVNdefine term3108NNterm called3109VVDcall remedial3110JJremedial action3111NNaction that3112WDTthat 's3113VBZbe defined3114VVNdefine in3115INin 1013116CD@card@ /3117SYM/ 243118CD@card@ ,3119,, and3120CCand it3121PPit defines3122VVZdefine what3123WPwhat a3124DTa remedial3125JJremedial action3126NNaction is3127VBZbe .3128SENT. So3129RBso they3130PPthey can3131MDcan do3132VVdo ordinary3133JJordinary things3134NNSthing to3135TOto their3136PP$their property3137NNproperty .3138SENT. They3139PPthey can3140MDcan 't3141RB't do3142VVPdo the3143DTthe major3144JJmajor upheaval3145NNupheaval of3146INof 500,0003147CD@card@ tons3148NNSton and3149CCand ...3150:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3151LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Whether3152INwhether the3153DTthe PRP3154NPPRP is3155VBZbe responsible3156JJresponsible to3157TOto someone3158NNsomeone else3159RBelse or3160CCor to3161TOto the3162DTthe EPA3163NPEPA ,3164,, whether3165INwhether they3166PPthey 're3167VBPbe continuous3168JJcontinuous landowners3169NNSlandowner or3170CCor something3171NNsomething else3172NNelse that3173WDTthat exempts3174VVZexempt them3175PPthem ,3176,, that3177WDTthat ...3178:... that3179WDTthat 's3180VBZbe my3181PP$my bottom3182JJbottom line3183NNline ,3184,, which3185WDTwhich is3186VBZbe the3187DTthe mere3188JJmere fact3189NNfact that3190IN/thatthat they3191PPthey want3192VVPwant to3193TOto take3194VVtake some3195DTsome action3196NNaction on3197INon their3198PP$their land3199NNland that3200WDTthat 's3201VBZbe remedial3202JJremedial ,3203,, they3204PPthey would3205MDwould have3206VHhave to3207TOto get3208VVget EPA3209NPEPA approval3210NNapproval ?3211SENT? [MS. BLATT]3212LOC[MS. BLATT] Absolutely3213RBabsolutely .3214SENT. And3215CCand PRP3216NPPRP status3217NNstatus ,3218,, it3219PPit does3220VVZdo n't3221RBn't ...3222:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3223LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Can3224MDcan you3225PPyou point3226VVpoint me3227PPme to3228TOto the3229DTthe provision3230NNprovision that3231WDTthat says3232VVZsay that3233IN/thatthat ,3234,, that3235WDTthat says3236VVZsay whether3237INwhether they3238PPthey 're3239VBPbe PRPs3240NNSPRPs or3241CCor not3242RBnot ,3243,, as3244RBas long3245RBlong as3246INas they3247PPthey 're3248VBPbe landowners3249NNSlandowner ,3250,, if3251INif they3252PPthey 're3253VBPbe going3254VVGgo to3255TOto take3256VVtake any3257DTany remedial3258JJremedial action3259NNaction on3260INon their3261PP$their property3262NNproperty ?3263SENT? [MS. BLATT]3264LOC[MS. BLATT] So3265INso 1223266CD@card@ (3267(( e3268LSe )3269)) (3270(( 63271CD6 )3272)) is3273VBZbe the3274DTthe one3275CDone that3276WDTthat says3277VVZsay PRPs3278NNSPRPs have3279VHPhave to3280TOto have3281VHhave EPA3282NPEPA 's3283POS's permission3284NNpermission for3285INfor any3286DTany remedial3287JJremedial action3288NNaction .3289SENT. And3290CCand then3291RBthen the3292DTthe 1073293CD@card@ ,3294,, 1223295CD@card@ (3296(( a3297DTa )3298)) ,3299,, 63300CD6 1223301CD@card@ (3302(( e3303LSe )3304)) (3305(( 13306LS1 )3307)) and3308CCand 1053309CD@card@ (3310(( h3311NNh )3312)) (3313(( 43314LS4 )3315)) ...3316:... (3317(( h3318NNh )3319)) ...3320:... excuse3321VVexcuse me3322PPme ,3323,, (3324(( h3325NNh )3326)) (3327(( 43328LS4 )3329)) (3330(( A3331NPA )3332)) is3333VBZbe the3334DTthe one3335CDone that3336WDTthat defines3337VVZdefine or3338CCor equates3339VVZequate owners3340NNSowner and3341CCand operators3342NNSoperator under3343INunder 1073344CD@card@ with3345INwith PRP3346NPPRP status3347NNstatus .3348SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3349LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank3350VVthank you3351PPyou ,3352,, counsel3353NNcounsel .3354SENT. Mr3355NPMr .3356SENT. Michel3357NPMichel .3358SENT.

[MR. MICHEL]3359LOC[MR. MICHEL] Thank3360VVthank you3361PPyou ,3362,, Mr3363NPMr .3364SENT. Chief3365NPChief Justice3366NPJustice ,3367,, and3368CCand may3369MDmay it3370PPit please3371VVplease the3372DTthe Court3373NPCourt :3374:: The3375DTthe United3376NPUnited States3377NPSStates is3378VBZbe here3379RBhere because3380INbecause the3381DTthe narrow3382JJnarrow aspect3383NNaspect of3384INof Respondents3385NNSrespondent '3386POS' suit3387NNsuit that3388WDTthat is3389VBZbe before3390INbefore this3391DTthis Court3392NPCourt ,3393,, namely3394RBnamely the3395DTthe request3396NNrequest for3397INfor a3398DTa distinctive3399JJdistinctive state3400NNstate law3401NNlaw remedy3402NNremedy under3403INunder which3404WDTwhich a3405DTa jury3406NNjury may3407MDmay authorize3408VVauthorize a3409DTa plan3410NNplan to3411TOto clean3412VVclean up3413RPup toxic3414JJtoxic contamination3415NNcontamination at3416INat a3417DTa Superfund3418NPSuperfund site3419NNsite in3420INin a3421DTa way3422NNway that3423IN/thatthat conflicts3424NNSconflict with3425INwith and3426CCand in3427INin many3428JJmany respects3429NNSrespect physically3430RBphysically destroys3431VVZdestroy the3432DTthe EPA3433NPEPA plan3434NNplan selected3435VVNselect under3436INunder CERCLA3437NPCERCLA ,3438,, squarely3439RBsquarely conflicts3440NNSconflict with3441INwith CERCLA3442NPCERCLA and3443CCand would3444MDwould jeopardize3445VVjeopardize EPA3446NPEPA 's3447POS's cleanups3448NNScleanup at3449INat this3450DTthis Superfund3451NPSuperfund site3452NNsite and3453CCand other3454JJother Superfund3455NPSuperfund sites3456NNSsite across3457INacross the3458DTthe nation3459NNnation .3460SENT. Now3461RBnow ,3462,, to3463TOto go3464VVgo to3465TOto some3466DTsome of3467INof the3468DTthe questions3469NNSquestion that3470WDTthat have3471VHPhave ...3472:... have3473VHPhave been3474VBNbe raised3475VVNraise already3476RBalready ,3477,, this3478DTthis is3479VBZbe a3480DTa narrow3481JJnarrow ...3482:... our3483PP$our argument3484NNargument here3485RBhere is3486VBZbe narrow3487JJnarrow .3488SENT. The3489DTthe ...3490:... the3491DTthe statute3492NNstatute does3493VVZdo have3494VHhave savings3495NNSsaving clauses3496NNSclause ,3497,, and3498CCand we3499PPwe do3500VVPdo n't3501RBn't dispute3502VVdispute that3503IN/thatthat Respondents3504NNSrespondent can3505MDcan move3506VVmove forward3507RBforward with3508INwith their3509PP$their claims3510NNSclaim for3511INfor money3512NNmoney damages3513NNSdamage under3514INunder state3515NNstate law3516NNlaw and3517CCand nuisance3518NNnuisance and3519CCand tort3520NNtort and3521CCand other3522JJother related3523JJrelated theories3524NNStheory that3525WDTthat do3526VVPdo n't3527RBn't call3528VVcall into3529INinto question3530NNquestion the3531DTthe EPA3532NPEPA remedy3533NNremedy .3534SENT. And3535CCand ,3536,, likewise3537RBlikewise ,3538,, as3539INas Justice3540NPJustice Kagan3541NPKagan pointed3542VVDpoint out3543RPout ,3544,, there3545EXthere are3546VBPbe a3547DTa number3548NNnumber of3549INof mechanisms3550NNSmechanism in3551INin the3552DTthe statute3553NNstatute for3554INfor states3555NNSstate to3556TOto adopt3557VVadopt what3558WPwhat are3559VBPbe called3560VVNcall ARARs3561NPARARs ,3562,, Applicable3563JJapplicable and3564CCand /3565SYM/ or3566CCor Relevant3567JJrelevant and3568CCand Appropriate3569JJappropriate Standards3570NPSStandards ,3571,, that3572WDTthat could3573MDcould be3574VBbe implemented3575VVNimplement as3576INas part3577NNpart of3578INof ...3579:... of3580INof the3581DTthe EPA3582NPEPA cleanup3583NNcleanup plan3584NNplan .3585SENT. And3586CCand I3587PPI think3588VVPthink that3589WDTthat goes3590VVZgo to3591TOto a3592DTa broader3593JJRbroad point3594NNpoint ,3595,, which3596WDTwhich is3597VBZbe that3598IN/thatthat CERCLA3599NPCERCLA really3600RBreally lays3601VVZlay out3602RPout a3603DTa two-step3604JJtwo-step process3605NNprocess .3606SENT. At3607INat the3608DTthe first3609JJfirst step3610NNstep ,3611,, EPA3612NPEPA ,3613,, or3614CCor whatever3615WDTwhatever federal3616JJfederal agency3617NNagency is3618VBZbe conducting3619VVGconduct the3620DTthe plan3621NNplan ,3622,, goes3623VVZgo through3624INthrough a3625DTa very3626RBvery reticulated3627VVNreticulate process3628NNprocess of3629INof getting3630VVGget public3631JJpublic comment3632NNcomment ,3633,, meeting3634VVGmeet with3635INwith ...3636:... meeting3637VVGmeet with3638INwith landowners3639NNSlandowner ,3640,, meeting3641NNmeeting with3642INwith the3643DTthe state3644NNstate ,3645,, and3646CCand selects3647VVZselect a3648DTa cleanup3649NNcleanup plan3650NNplan in3651INin ...3652:... in3653INin compliance3654NNcompliance with3655INwith those3656DTthose procedural3657JJprocedural and3658CCand the3659DTthe substantive3660JJsubstantive requirement3661NNrequirement that3662IN/thatthat they3663PPthey protect3664VVprotect human3665JJhuman health3666NNhealth .3667SENT. Then3668RBthen ,3669,, at3670INat the3671DTthe second3672JJsecond stage3673NNstage ,3674,, CERCLA3675NPCERCLA says3676VVZsay go3677VVgo and3678CCand carry3679VVcarry out3680RPout the3681DTthe cleanup3682NNcleanup plan3683NNplan and3684CCand CERCLA3685NPCERCLA erects3686VVZerect a3687DTa number3688NNnumber of3689INof protections3690NNSprotection ...3691:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3692LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Sorry3693JJsorry ,3694,, are3695VBPbe you3696PPyou agreeing3697VVGagree with3698INwith Ms3699NNMs .3700SENT. Blatt3701NPBlatt that3702IN/thatthat your3703PP$your plan3704NNplan is3705VBZbe both3706CCboth the3707DTthe floor3708NNfloor and3709CCand the3710DTthe ceiling3711NNceiling ?3712SENT? [MR. MICHEL]3713LOC[MR. MICHEL] So3714INso I3715PPI think3716VVPthink it3717PPit ...3718:... not3719RBnot necessarily3720RBnecessarily in3721INin every3722DTevery respect3723NNrespect ,3724,, but3725CCbut I3726PPI think3727VVPthink in3728INin the3729DTthe respect3730NNrespect that3731WDTthat matters3732VVZmatter in3733INin this3734DTthis case3735NNcase ,3736,, it3737PPit is3738VBZbe .3739SENT. And3740CCand 123741CD@card@ I3742PPI ...3743:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3744LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] No3745UHNo ,3746,, no3747UHno ,3748,, no3749UHno ,3750,, let3751VVlet me3752PPme ...3753:... let3754VVlet me3755PPme go3756VVgo back3757RBback .3758SENT. Is3759VBZbe it3760PPit always3761RBalways the3762DTthe ceiling3763NNceiling ?3764SENT? [MR. MICHEL]3765LOC[MR. MICHEL] I3766PPI mean3767VVPmean ,3768,, an3769DTan EPA3770NPEPA ...3771:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3772LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] An3773DTan owner3774NNowner can3775MDcan come3776VVcome to3777TOto you3778PPyou and3779CCand say3780VVPsay I3781PPI want3782VVPwant to3783TOto do3784VVdo more3785JJRmore ,3786,, and3787CCand you3788PPyou can3789MDcan decide3790VVdecide yes3791RByes or3792CCor no3793RBno ,3794,, right3795RBright ?3796SENT? [MR. MICHEL]3797LOC[MR. MICHEL] Yes3798NPYes ,3799,, absolutely3800RBabsolutely .3801SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3802LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So3803INso it3804PPit 's3805VBZbe not3806RBnot always3807RBalways the3808DTthe ceiling3809NNceiling .3810SENT. [MR. MICHEL]3811LOC[MR. MICHEL] I3812PPI mean3813VVPmean ...3814:... yes3815UHyes .3816SENT. And3817CCand ,3818,, in3819INin fact3820NNfact ,3821,, the3822DTthe statute3823NNstatute ...3824:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3825LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] All3826DTall right3827NNright .3828SENT. [MR. MICHEL]3829LOC[MR. MICHEL] ...3830:... as3831INas we3832PPwe discussed3833VVDdiscuss ,3834,, as3835RBas ...3836:... as3837INas Ms3838NNMs .3839SENT. Blatt3840NPBlatt discussed3841VVDdiscuss at3842INat length3843NNlength ...3844:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3845LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So3846CCso are3847VBPbe you3848PPyou reading3849VVGread their3850PP$their state3851NNstate ...3852:... are3853VBPbe you3854PPyou reading3855VVGread this3856DTthis remedy3857NNremedy as3858INas requiring3859VVGrequire the3860DTthe remediation3861NNremediation that3862WDTthat 's3863VHZhave awarded3864VVNaward no3865DTno matter3866NNmatter what3867WPwhat ?3868SENT? With3869INwith or3870CCor without3871INwithout EPA3872NPEPA approval3873NNapproval ?3874SENT? [MR. MICHEL]3875LOC[MR. MICHEL] I3876PPI ...3877:... I3878PPI think3879VVPthink the3880DTthe Montana3881NPMontana Supreme3882NPSupreme Court3883NPCourt decision3884NNdecision implies3885VVZimply that3886IN/thatthat Respondents3887NNSrespondent could3888MDcould move3889VVmove forward3890RBforward with3891INwith their3892PP$their claim3893NNclaim as3894INas it3895PPit now3896RBnow exists3897VVZexist even3898RBeven if3899INif they3900PPthey did3901VVDdo n't3902RBn't have3903VHhave EPA3904NPEPA approval3905NNapproval .3906SENT. And3907CCand we3908PPwe think3909VVPthink that3910WDTthat is3911VBZbe ...3912:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3913LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] How3914WRBHow about3915RBabout if3916INif they3917PPthey did3918VVDdo ,3919,, if3920INif they3921PPthey could3922MDcould get3923VVget your3924PP$your approval3925NNapproval ,3926,, if3927INif they3928PPthey could3929MDcould show3930VVshow that3931IN/thatthat they3932PPthey could3933MDcould get3934VVget your3935PP$your approval3936NNapproval ?3937SENT? [MR. MICHEL]3938LOC[MR. MICHEL] I3939PPI mean3940VVPmean ,3941,, if3942INif they3943PPthey could3944MDcould get3945VVget our3946PP$our approval3947NNapproval under3948INunder 1223949CD@card@ (3950(( e3951LSe )3952)) (3953(( 63954CD6 )3955)) ,3956,, then3957RBthen we3958PPwe would3959MDwould n't3960RBn't have3961VHhave a3962DTa problem3963NNproblem with3964INwith ...3965:... with3966INwith the3967DTthe suit3968NNsuit ,3969,, but3970CCbut I3971PPI think3972VVPthink that3973DTthat ...3974:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3975LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] All3976DTall right3977NNright .3978SENT. How3979WRBHow about3980RBabout if3981INif they3982PPthey 're3983VBPbe not3984RBnot a3985DTa PRP3986NPPRP ?3987SENT? Let3988VVlet 's3989VBZbe assume3990VVassume they3991PPthey 're3992VBPbe a3993DTa contiguous3994JJcontiguous ...3995:... there3996EXthere 's3997VBZbe a3998DTa whole3999JJwhole set4000NNset of4001INof arguments4002NNSargument in4003INin these4004DTthese briefs4005NNSbrief by4006INby some4007DTsome of4008INof them4009PPthem ,4010,, putting4011VVGput aside4012RBaside whether4013INwhether they4014PPthey 're4015VBPbe a4016DTa PRP4017NPPRP because4018INbecause of4019INof ...4020:... of4021INof the4022DTthe statute4023NNstatute of4024INof limitations4025NNSlimitation ,4026,, which4027WDTwhich ,4028,, you4029PPyou know4030VVPknow ,4031,, is4032VBZbe not4033RBnot very4034RBvery compelling4035JJcompelling to4036TOto me4037PPme ,4038,, okay4039JJokay ?4040SENT? But4041CCbut putting4042VVGput that4043IN/thatthat aside4044RBaside ,4045,, let4046VVlet 's4047VBZbe assume4048VVassume that4049IN/thatthat by4050INby definition4051NNdefinition they4052PPthey are4053VBPbe a4054DTa PRP4055NPPRP .4056SENT. Or4057CCor they4058PPthey 're4059VBPbe not4060RBnot a4061DTa PRP4062NPPRP ;4063:; they4064PPthey 're4065VBPbe a4066DTa continuous4067JJcontinuous landowner4068NNlandowner .4069SENT. They4070PPthey are4071VBPbe not4072RBnot a4073DTa PRP4074NPPRP .4075SENT. What4076WPWhat about4077INabout those4078DTthose people4079NNSpeople ?4080SENT? [MR. MICHEL]4081LOC[MR. MICHEL] So4082INso I4083PPI think4084VVPthink an4085DTan important4086JJimportant distinction4087NNdistinction is4088VBZbe that4089IN/thatthat if4090INif they4091PPthey were4092VBDbe found4093VVNfind to4094TOto be4095VBbe a4096DTa contiguous4097JJcontiguous landowner4098NNlandowner ,4099,, that4100WDTthat would4101MDwould not4102RBnot take4103VVtake them4104PPthem out4105RPout of4106INof the4107DTthe status4108NNstatus of4109INof being4110VBGbe a4111DTa PRP4112NPPRP .4113SENT. That4114DTthat would4115MDwould imply4116VVimply that4117IN/thatthat they4118PPthey 're4119VBPbe not4120RBnot liable4121JJliable ,4122,, as4123RBas ...4124:... as4125INas you4126PPyou pointed4127VVDpoint out4128RPout ...4129:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]4130LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] All4131DTall right4132NNright .4133SENT. So4134RBso what4135WPwhat you4136PPyou 're4137VBPbe saying4138VVGsay is4139VBZbe if4140INif you4141PPyou 're4142VBPbe a4143DTa landowner4144NNlandowner ,4145,, you4146PPyou might4147MDmight not4148RBnot be4149VBbe liable4150JJliable because4151INbecause some4152DTsome justices4153NNSjustice might4154MDmight have4155VHhave a4156DTa problem4157NNproblem with4158INwith the4159DTthe concept4160NNconcept that4161IN/thatthat someone4162NNsomeone who4163WPwho did4164VVDdo n't4165RBn't pollute4166VVpollute and4167CCand does4168VVZdo n't4169RBn't encourage4170VVencourage the4171DTthe polluting4172VVGpollute would4173MDwould be4174VBbe financially4175RBfinancially liable4176JJliable .4177SENT. [MR. MICHEL]4178LOC[MR. MICHEL] And4179CCand that4180DTthat 's4181VBZbe an4182DTan instinct4183NNinstinct that4184IN/thatthat EPA4185NPEPA shares4186NNSshare as4187INas we4188PPwe quote4189VVPquote in4190INin our4191PP$our brief4192NNbrief .4193SENT. EPA4194NPEPA has4195VHZhave had4196VHNhave a4197DTa policy4198NNpolicy since4199INsince 19914200CD@card@ of4201INof not4202RBnot imposing4203VVGimpose liability4204NNliability on4205INon residential4206JJresidential landowners4207NNSlandowner on4208INon Superfund4209NPSuperfund sites4210NNSsite .4211SENT. But4212CCbut ...4213:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4214LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So4215RBso ,4216,, Mr4217NPMr .4218SENT. Michel4219NPMichel ,4220,, if4221INif I4222PPI could4223MDcould ask4224VVask about4225INabout the4226DTthe PRP4227NPPRP status4228NNstatus ,4229,, because4230INbecause there4231EXthere are4232VBPbe obvious4233JJobvious consequences4234NNSconsequence of4235INof labeling4236VVGlabel somebody4237NNsomebody a4238DTa PRP4239NPPRP in4240INin the4241DTthe way4242NNway that4243IN/thatthat you4244PPyou suggest4245VVPsuggest ,4246,, that4247IN/thatthat these4248DTthese sites4249NNSsite ...4250:... and4251CCand they4252PPthey can4253MDcan be4254VBbe sites4255NNSsite for4256INfor decades4257NNSdecade and4258CCand decade4259NNdecade and4260CCand ...4261:... and4262CCand deprive4263VVdeprive people4264NNSpeople of4265INof doing4266VVGdo some4267DTsome significant4268JJsignificant things4269NNSthing that4270IN/thatthat they4271PPthey want4272VVPwant to4273TOto do4274VVdo to4275TOto their4276PP$their land4277NNland .4278SENT. And4279CCand the4280DTthe question4281NNquestion ,4282,, I4283PPI guess4284VVPguess ,4285,, is4286VBZbe why4287WRBwhy do4288VVPdo you4289PPyou ...4290:... why4291WRBwhy do4292VVPdo we4293PPwe think4294VVPthink the4295DTthe statute4296NNstatute requires4297VVZrequire those4298DTthose consequences4299NNSconsequence as4300RBas to4301TOto a4302DTa person4303NNperson whom4304WPwhom has4305VHZhave ...4306:... who4307WPwho has4308VHZhave never4309RBnever been4310VBNbe treated4311VVNtreat as4312INas a4313DTa PRP4314NPPRP by4315INby the4316DTthe government4317NNgovernment ,4318,, who4319WPwho has4320VHZhave never4321RBnever been4322VBNbe involved4323VVNinvolve in4324INin settlement4325NNsettlement negotiations4326NNSnegotiation ,4327,, who4328WPwho ,4329,, under4330INunder reigning4331VVGreign law4332NNlaw ,4333,, including4334VVGinclude the4335DTthe statute4336NNstatute of4337INof limitations4338NNSlimitation ,4339,, has4340VHZhave no4341DTno liability4342NNliability exposure4343NNexposure ?4344SENT? I4345PPI mean4346VVPmean ,4347,, it4348PPit would4349MDwould seem4350VVseem a4351DTa big4352JJbig deal4353NNdeal to4354TOto take4355VVtake a4356DTa person4357NNperson like4358INlike that4359DTthat and4360CCand say4361VVPsay you4362PPyou 've4363VHPhave lost4364VVNlose some4365DTsome significant4366JJsignificant property4367NNproperty rights4368NNSright .4369SENT. Why4370WRBwhy ?4371SENT? [MR. MICHEL]4372LOC[MR. MICHEL] So4373INso I4374PPI think4375VVPthink two4376CDtwo responses4377NNSresponse .4378SENT. First4379RBfirst ,4380,, I4381PPI do4382VVPdo want4383VVwant to4384TOto make4385VVmake clear4386JJclear that4387IN/thatthat 1224388CD@card@ (4389(( e4390LSe )4391)) (4392(( 64393CD6 )4394)) ,4395,, the4396DTthe PRP4397NPPRP provision4398NNprovision that4399IN/thatthat we4400PPwe 're4401VBPbe talking4402VVGtalk about4403RBabout here4404RBhere ,4405,, only4406RBonly applies4407VVZapply to4408TOto remedial4409JJremedial action4410NNaction .4411SENT. And4412CCand that4413WDTthat has4414VHZhave a4415DTa defined4416VVNdefine statutory4417JJstatutory definition4418NNdefinition .4419SENT. It4420PPit 's4421VBZbe in4422INin 204423CD@card@ 96014424CD@card@ (4425(( a4426DTa )4427)) (4428(( 44429LS4 )4430)) .4431SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4432LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But4433CCbut I4434PPI said4435VVDsay some4436DTsome significant4437JJsignificant things4438NNSthing .4439SENT. [MR. MICHEL]4440LOC[MR. MICHEL] So4441RBso ...4442:... so4443RBso ...4444:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4445LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So4446RBso ,4447,, you4448PPyou know4449VVPknow ,4450,, look4451VVPlook ,4452,, that4453IN/thatthat you4454PPyou can4455MDcan still4456RBstill ,4457,, you4458PPyou know4459VVPknow ,4460,, make4461VVPmake a4462DTa garden4463NNgarden .4464SENT. [MR. MICHEL]4465LOC[MR. MICHEL] Absolutely4466RBabsolutely ,4467,, you4468PPyou can4469MDcan still4470RBstill make4471VVmake a4472DTa garden4473NNgarden .4474SENT. Now4475RBnow ,4476,, as4477RBas to4478TOto significant4479JJsignificant things4480NNSthing ,4481,, I4482PPI think4483VVPthink it4484PPit does4485VVZdo make4486VVmake perfect4487JJperfect sense4488NNsense that4489IN/thatthat you4490PPyou would4491MDwould n't4492RBn't want4493VVwant somebody4494NNsomebody who4495WPwho lives4496VVZlive on4497INon a4498DTa Superfund4499NPSuperfund site4500NNsite doing4501VVGdo things4502NNSthing in4503INin the4504DTthe earth4505NNearth that4506WDTthat will4507MDwill interfere4508VVinterfere with4509INwith the4510DTthe EPA4511NPEPA remedy4512NNremedy .4513SENT. Of4514INof course4515NNcourse ,4516,, you4517PPyou know4518VVPknow ,4519,, there4520EXthere 's4521VBZbe ...4522:... there4523EXthere is4524VBZbe ,4525,, on4526INon a4527DTa Superfund4528NPSuperfund site4529NNsite ,4530,, a4531DTa sort4532NNsort of4533INof butterfly4534NNbutterfly flaps4535VVZflap its4536PP$its wings4537NNSwing problem4538NNproblem where4539WRBwhere ,4540,, if4541INif you4542PPyou dig4543VVPdig up4544RPup two4545CDtwo feet4546NNSfoot of4547INof soil4548NNsoil on4549INon your4550PP$your land4551NNland ,4552,, you4553PPyou can4554MDcan kick4555VVkick up4556RPup arsenic4557NNarsenic into4558INinto the4559DTthe air4560NNair ,4561,, or4562CCor if4563INif you4564PPyou dig4565VVPdig a4566DTa trench4567NNtrench on4568INon your4569PP$your land4570NNland ...4571:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4572LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So4573INso I4574PPI guess4575VVPguess I4576PPI ...4577:... I4578PPI ...4579:... I4580PPI completely4581RBcompletely take4582VVPtake the4583DTthe point4584NNpoint that4585IN/thatthat that4586WDTthat might4587MDmight have4588VHhave been4589VBNbe a4590DTa sensible4591JJsensible policy4592NNpolicy decision4593NNdecision for4594INfor Congress4595NPCongress to4596TOto make4597VVmake ,4598,, but4599CCbut ,4600,, as4601INas I4602PPI look4603VVPlook at4604INat these4605DTthese provisions4606NNSprovision ,4607,, the4608DTthe only4609JJonly ...4610:... the4611DTthe ...4612:... the4613DTthe ...4614:... where4615WRBwhere this4616DTthis PRP4617NPPRP comes4618VVZcome from4619INfrom is4620VBZbe ...4621:... is4622VBZbe ...4623:... is4624VBZbe in4625INin a4626DTa section4627NNsection that4628IN/thatthat deals4629NNSdeal with4630INwith settlement4631NNsettlement negotiations4632NNSnegotiation .4633SENT. And4634CCand these4635DTthese people4636NNSpeople were4637VBDbe not4638RBnot ever4639RBever involved4640VVNinvolve in4641INin settlement4642NNsettlement negotiations4643NNSnegotiation .4644SENT. Nobody4645NNnobody for4646INfor a4647DTa moment4648NNmoment considered4649VVDconsider that4650IN/thatthat they4651PPthey should4652MDshould be4653VBbe involved4654VVNinvolve in4655INin settlement4656NNsettlement negotiations4657NNSnegotiation .4658SENT. So4659RBso to4660TOto apply4661VVapply that4662DTthat section4663NNsection to4664TOto these4665DTthese people4666NNSpeople seems4667VVZseem ,4668,, you4669PPyou know4670VVPknow ,4671,, a4672DTa stretch4673NNstretch .4674SENT. [MR. MICHEL]4675LOC[MR. MICHEL] So4676INso I4677PPI ...4678:... I4679PPI do4680VVPdo n't4681RBn't think4682VVthink so4683RBso ,4684,, Justice4685NPJustice Kagan4686NPKagan .4687SENT. I4688PPI ...4689:... PRP4690NPPRP is4691VBZbe used4692VVNuse in4693INin the4694DTthe statute4695NNstatute a4696DTa lot4697NNlot of4698INof different4699JJdifferent times4700NNStime ,4701,, not4702RBnot just4703RBjust in4704INin the4705DTthe settlement4706NNsettlement .4707SENT. You4708PPyou 're4709VBPbe right4710JJright that4711IN/thatthat (4712(( e4713LSe )4714)) (4715(( 64716CD6 )4717)) is4718VBZbe under4719INunder the4720DTthe settlement4721NNsettlement provision4722NNprovision ,4723,, but4724CCbut if4725INif you4726PPyou look4727VVPlook at4728INat (4729(( e4730LSe )4731)) (4732(( 14733LS1 )4734)) ,4735,, it4736PPit 's4737VBZbe ...4738:... it4739PPit ...4740:... it4741PPit equates4742VVZequate owners4743NNSowner on4744INon the4745DTthe site4746NNsite with4747INwith PRPs4748NPPRPs .4749SENT. And4750CCand so4751INso the4752DTthe Court4753NPCourt could4754MDcould leave4755VVleave for4756INfor another4757DTanother day4758NNday whether4759INwhether PRP4760NPPRP is4761VBZbe coterminous4762JJcoterminous with4763INwith covered4764JJcovered persons4765NNSperson under4766INunder Section4767NPSection 1074768CD@card@ and4769CCand simply4770RBsimply decide4771VVdecide that4772IN/thatthat owners4773NNSowner on4774INon Superfund4775NPSuperfund sites4776NNSsite are4777VBPbe PRPs4778NPPRPs .4779SENT. And4780CCand ,4781,, again4782RBagain ,4783,, we4784PPwe think4785VVPthink that4786WDTthat makes4787VVZmake perfect4788JJperfect sense4789NNsense because4790INbecause ,4791,, by4792INby definition4793NNdefinition ,4794,, when4795WRBwhen you4796PPyou have4797VHPhave a4798DTa cleanup4799NNcleanup plan4800NNplan that4801WDTthat takes4802VVZtake into4803INinto account4804NNaccount an4805DTan entire4806JJentire Superfund4807NPSuperfund site4808NNsite ,4809,, as4810INas this4811DTthis one4812CDone does4813VVZdo ,4814,, and4815CCand one4816CDone landowner4817NNlandowner does4818VVZdo something4819NNsomething that4820WDTthat affects4821VVZaffect the4822DTthe earth4823NNearth or4824CCor affects4825VVZaffect the4826DTthe environment4827NNenvironment ,4828,, it4829PPit 's4830VBZbe going4831VVGgo to4832TOto spread4833VVspread across4834RPacross onto4835INonto other4836JJother parts4837NNSpart of4838INof the4839DTthe Superfund4840NPSuperfund site4841NNsite .4842SENT. And4843CCand the4844DTthe water4845NNwater barriers4846NNSbarrier that4847IN/thatthat we4848PPwe 've4849VHPhave discussed4850VVNdiscuss in4851INin this4852DTthis case4853NNcase are4854VBPbe a4855DTa good4856JJgood example4857NNexample ,4858,, where4859WRBwhere EPA4860NPEPA has4861VHZhave a4862DTa considered4863VVNconsider plan4864NNplan to4865TOto treat4866VVtreat the4867DTthe water4868NNwater in4869INin a4870DTa certain4871JJcertain way4872NNway ,4873,, and4874CCand Respondents4875NNSrespondent want4876VVPwant to4877TOto dig4878VVdig ...4879:... I4880PPI think4881VVPthink it4882PPit 's4883VBZbe an4884DTan 8,0004885CD@card@ -foot4886NN-foot trench4887NNtrench that4888WDTthat would4889MDwould change4890VVchange the4891DTthe gradient4892NNgradient and4893CCand would4894MDwould physically4895RBphysically change4896VVchange the4897DTthe land4898NNland in4899INin a4900DTa way4901NNway that4902WDTthat could4903MDcould endanger4904VVendanger the4905DTthe whole4906JJwhole Superfund4907NPSuperfund site4908NNsite off4909RBoff of4910INof their4911PP$their own4912JJown property4913NNproperty .4914SENT. So4915RBso it4916PPit is4917VBZbe true4918JJtrue that4919IN/thatthat when4920WRBwhen you4921PPyou live4922VVPlive on4923INon a4924DTa Superfund4925NPSuperfund site4926NNsite and4927CCand you4928PPyou have4929VHPhave large4930JJlarge amounts4931NNSamount of4932INof toxic4933JJtoxic chemicals4934NNSchemical ,4935,, you4936PPyou are4937VBPbe more4938RBRmore restricted4939VVNrestrict in4940INin the4941DTthe kind4942NNkind of4943INof land4944NNland use4945NNuse that4946WDTthat you4947PPyou ...4948:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4949LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But4950CCbut it4951PPit seems4952VVZseem a4953DTa very4954RBvery indirect4955JJindirect way4956NNway for4957INfor Congress4958NPCongress to4959TOto have4960VHhave gone4961VVNgo about4962INabout this4963DTthis ,4964,, as4965INas Justice4966NPJustice Kagan4967NPKagan says4968VVZsay ,4969,, to4970TOto ,4971,, in4972INin essence4973NNessence ,4974,, hinder4975VVhinder a4976DTa landowner4977NNlandowner from4978INfrom doing4979VVGdo any4980DTany significant4981JJsignificant action4982NNaction for4983INfor decades4984NNSdecade .4985SENT. [MR. MICHEL]4986LOC[MR. MICHEL] I4987PPI mean4988VVPmean ,4989,, I4990PPI think4991VVPthink on4992INon ...4993:... it4994PPit 's4995VBZbe not4996RBnot that4997IN/thatthat strange4998JJstrange to4999TOto see5000VVsee that5001IN/thatthat an5002DTan owner5003NNowner of5004INof a5005DTa Superfund5006NPSuperfund site5007NNsite ,5008,, somebody5009NNsomebody who5010WPwho lives5011VVZlive on5012INon a5013DTa contaminated5014JJcontaminated property5015NNproperty ,5016,, is5017VBZbe hindered5018VVNhinder from5019INfrom taking5020VVGtake remedial5021JJremedial action5022NNaction ,5023,, which5024WDTwhich is5025VBZbe a5026DTa fairly5027RBfairly significant5028JJsignificant action5029NNaction ,5030,, without5031INwithout EPA5032NPEPA approval5033NNapproval .5034SENT. Of5035INof course5036NNcourse ,5037,, EPA5038NPEPA can5039MDcan grant5040VVgrant approval5041NNapproval ,5042,, and5043CCand EPA5044NPEPA has5045VHZhave in5046INin other5047JJother cases5048NNScase granted5049VVDgrant approval5050NNapproval for5051INfor remedial5052JJremedial actions5053NNSaction on5054INon Superfund5055NPSuperfund sites5056NNSsite .5057SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5058LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] So5059INso your5060PP$your two5061CDtwo answers5062NNSanswer are5063VBPbe ,5064,, one5065CDone ,5066,, it5067PPit 's5068VBZbe only5069RBonly significant5070JJsignificant action5071NNaction and5072CCand ,5073,, two5074CDtwo ,5075,, EPA5076NPEPA could5077MDcould grant5078VVgrant approval5079NNapproval ?5080SENT? [MR. MICHEL]5081LOC[MR. MICHEL] Absolutely5082RBabsolutely .5083SENT. It5084PPit 's5085VBZbe a5086DTa ...5087:... so5088RBso it5089PPit 's5090VBZbe a5091DTa limited5092JJlimited incursion5093NNincursion to5094TOto the5095DTthe degree5096NNdegree that5097IN/thatthat it5098PPit restricts5099VVZrestrict property5100NNproperty rights5101NNSright .5102SENT. That5103DTthat 's5104VBZbe what5105WPwhat comes5106VVZcome with5107INwith living5108VVGlive on5109RPon ...5110:... on5111INon a5112DTa Superfund5113NPSuperfund site5114NNsite ,5115,, and5116CCand that5117DTthat 's5118VBZbe what5119WPwhat 's5120VBZbe necessary5121JJnecessary to5122TOto protect5123VVprotect ...5124:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5125LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Then5126RBthen ...5127:... then5128RBthen what5129WPwhat is5130VBZbe your5131PP$your answer5132NNanswer to5133TOto the5134DTthe question5135NNquestion Ms5136NNMs .5137SENT. Blatt5138NPBlatt was5139VBDbe asked5140VVNask ?5141SENT? If5142INif we5143PPwe say5144VVPsay the5145DTthe landowners5146NNSlandowner are5147VBPbe PRPs5148NPPRPs and5149CCand they5150PPthey have5151VHPhave to5152TOto get5153VVget EPA5154NPEPA permission5155NNpermission for5156INfor any5157DTany restoration5158NNrestoration that5159IN/thatthat they5160PPthey want5161VVPwant to5162TOto do5163VVdo ,5164,, if5165INif the5166DTthe Court5167NPCourt said5168VVDsay that5169IN/thatthat ,5170,, then5171RBthen I5172PPI do5173VVPdo n't5174RBn't see5175VVsee that5176IN/thatthat the5177DTthe further5178JJRfurther questions5179NNSquestion in5180INin this5181DTthis case5182NNcase need5183VVPneed to5184TOto be5185VBbe answered5186VVNanswer .5187SENT. And5188CCand I5189PPI do5190VVPdo n't5191RBn't see5192VVsee any5193DTany reason5194NNreason to5195TOto get5196VVget into5197INinto preemption5198NNpreemption .5199SENT. [MR. MICHEL]5200LOC[MR. MICHEL] I5201PPI agree5202VVPagree with5203INwith you5204PPyou ,5205,, Justice5206NPJustice Ginsburg5207NPGinsburg .5208SENT. You5209PPyou could5210MDcould resolve5211VVresolve the5212DTthe case5213NNcase by5214INby ...5215:... by5216INby saying5217VVGsay that5218IN/thatthat Respondents5219NNSrespondent are5220VBPbe PRPs5221NNSPRPs who5222WPwho need5223VVPneed EPA5224NPEPA authorization5225NNauthorization ...5226:... authorization5227NNauthorization and5228CCand do5229VVPdo n't5230RBn't have5231VHhave it5232PPit and5233CCand ,5234,, therefore5235RBtherefore ,5236,, their5237PP$their ...5238:... their5239PP$their claim5240NNclaim fails5241VVZfail .5242SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]5243LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] What5244WPWhat do5245VVPdo we5246PPwe do5247VVPdo about5248INabout the5249DTthe government5250NNgovernment 's5251POS's prior5252JJprior representations5253NNSrepresentation that5254IN/thatthat permission5255NNpermission might5256MDmight be5257VBbe granted5258VVNgrant for5259INfor something5260NNsomething like5261INlike this5262DTthis ?5263SENT? [MR. MICHEL]5264LOC[MR. MICHEL] Well5265UHwell ,5266,, I5267PPI mean5268VVPmean ,5269,, the5270DTthe government5271NNgovernment stands5272VVZstand ready5273JJready to5274TOto listen5275VVlisten to5276TOto EPA5277NPEPA ...5278:... to5279TOto any5280DTany proposals5281NNSproposal from5282INfrom the5283DTthe landowners5284NNSlandowner .5285SENT. They5286PPthey have5287VHPhave not5288RBnot formally5289RBformally presented5290VVNpresent us5291PPus with5292INwith any5293DTany proposals5294NNSproposal ,5295,, so5296RBso we5297PPwe 're5298VBPbe working5299VVGwork off5300RPoff of5301INof the5302DTthe best5303RBSwell available5304JJavailable information5305NNinformation ,5306,, which5307WDTwhich is5308VBZbe the5309DTthe expert5310NNexpert reports5311VVZreport that5312IN/thatthat they5313PPthey have5314VHPhave introduced5315VVNintroduce in5316INin the5317DTthe state5318NNstate litigation5319NNlitigation .5320SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]5321LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] So5322INso it5323PPit 's5324VBZbe still5325RBstill at5326INat least5327JJSleast possible5328JJpossible that5329IN/thatthat the5330DTthe government5331NNgovernment might5332MDmight approve5333VVapprove something5334NNsomething like5335INlike this5336DTthis ?5337SENT? [MR. MICHEL]5338LOC[MR. MICHEL] I5339PPI mean5340VVPmean ,5341,, based5342VVNbase on5343INon what5344WPwhat we5345PPwe know5346VVPknow ,5347,, we5348PPwe 've5349VHPhave made5350VVNmake very5351RBvery clear5352JJclear ,5353,, we5354PPwe 're5355VBPbe now5356RBnow in5357INin the5358DTthe Supreme5359NPSupreme Court5360NPCourt litigating5361VVGlitigate this5362DTthis case5363NNcase ,5364,, that5365WDTthat we5366PPwe would5367MDwould not5368RBnot approve5369VVapprove what5370WPwhat we5371PPwe understand5372VVPunderstand their5373PP$their plan5374NNplan to5375TOto be5376VBbe ,5377,, but5378CCbut we5379PPwe 're5380VBPbe not5381RBnot saying5382VVGsay never5383RBnever .5384SENT. Of5385INof course5386NNcourse ,5387,, they5388PPthey could5389MDcould present5390VVpresent something5391NNsomething and5392CCand we5393PPwe would5394MDwould listen5395VVlisten to5396TOto it5397PPit .5398SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]5399LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] And5400CCand I5401PPI might5402MDmight ...5403:... might5404MDmight have5405VHhave missed5406VVNmiss it5407PPit ,5408,, but5409CCbut just5410RBjust when5411WRBwhen is5412VBZbe the5413DTthe government5414NNgovernment 's5415POS's role5416NNrole here5417RBhere likely5418JJlikely to5419TOto finish5420VVfinish in5421INin this5422DTthis particular5423JJparticular site5424NNsite ?5425SENT? [MR. MICHEL]5426LOC[MR. MICHEL] So5427INso I5428PPI think5429VVPthink the5430DTthe government5431NNgovernment ...5432:... the5433DTthe ongoing5434JJongoing remediation5435NNremediation will5436MDwill continue5437VVcontinue through5438INthrough 20255439CD@card@ ,5440,, is5441VBZbe the5442DTthe latest5443JJSlate ...5444:... is5445VBZbe the5446DTthe latest5447JJSlate projection5448NNprojection .5449SENT. It5450PPit may5451MDmay be5452VBbe that5453DTthat ,5454,, you5455PPyou know5456VVPknow ,5457,, there5458EXthere are5459VBPbe continuing5460VVGcontinue operations5461NNSoperation beyond5462INbeyond that5463DTthat ,5464,, but5465CCbut the5466DTthe active5467JJactive site5468NNsite remediation5469NNremediation we5470PPwe expect5471VVPexpect to5472TOto continue5473VVcontinue through5474INthrough about5475RBabout 205476CD@card@ 20255477CD@card@ .5478SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]5479LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Is5480VBZbe there5481RBthere ...5482:... is5483VBZbe there5484RBthere a5485DTa takings5486NNStaking claim5487VVPclaim ,5488,, do5489VVPdo you5490PPyou think5491VVPthink ,5492,, that5493WDTthat arises5494VVZarise from5495INfrom the5496DTthe government5497NNgovernment 's5498POS's position5499NNposition that5500IN/thatthat any5501DTany remediation5502NNremediation efforts5503NNSeffort for5504INfor a5505DTa period5506NNperiod of5507INof ,5508,, I5509PPI guess5510VVPguess ,5511,, 455512CD@card@ years5513NNSyear is5514VBZbe prohibited5515VVNprohibit by5516INby landowners5517NNSlandowner ?5518SENT? [MR. MICHEL]5519LOC[MR. MICHEL] I5520PPI mean5521VVPmean ,5522,, in5523INin the5524DTthe literal5525JJliteral sense5526NNsense ,5527,, there5528EXthere 's5529VBZbe no5530DTno takings5531NNStaking claim5532VVPclaim because5533INbecause they5534PPthey have5535VHPhave n't5536RBn't raised5537VVNraise one5538CDone in5539INin this5540DTthis case5541NNcase .5542SENT. I5543PPI think5544VVPthink more5545JJRmore ...5546:... more5547RBRmore broadly5548RBbroadly ...5549:... of5550INof course5551NNcourse ,5552,, one5553PPone could5554MDcould raise5555VVraise a5556DTa takings5557NNStaking claim5558VVPclaim ,5559,, but5560CCbut I5561PPI think5562VVPthink it5563PPit would5564MDwould be5565VBbe a5566DTa very5567RBvery weak5568JJweak claim5569NNclaim given5570VVNgive that5571IN/thatthat ,5572,, in5573INin fact5574NNfact ,5575,, EPA5576NPEPA 's5577POS's remedy5578NNremedy has5579VHZhave improved5580VVNimprove the5581DTthe value5582NNvalue of5583INof the5584DTthe property5585NNproperty and5586CCand that5587IN/thatthat you5588PPyou have5589VHPhave to5590TOto start5591VVstart from5592INfrom the5593DTthe premise5594NNpremise that5595IN/thatthat the5596DTthe property5597NNproperty is5598VBZbe ...5599:... is5600VBZbe covered5601VVNcover with5602INwith arsenic5603NNarsenic .5604SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]5605LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well5606UHwell ,5607,, it5608PPit 's5609VBZbe ...5610:... it5611PPit 's5612VBZbe ...5613:... it5614PPit 's5615VHZhave improved5616VVNimprove the5617DTthe value5618NNvalue of5619INof the5620DTthe property5621NNproperty from5622INfrom its5623PP$its prior5624JJprior state5625NNstate but5626CCbut not5627RBnot ...5628:... not5629RBnot to5630TOto a5631DTa level5632NNlevel that5633IN/thatthat state5634NNstate law5635NNlaw would5636MDwould allow5637VVallow .5638SENT. [MR. MICHEL]5639LOC[MR. MICHEL] Well5640UHWell ,5641,, I5642PPI ...5643:... I5644PPI do5645VVPdo think5646VVthink that5647IN/thatthat that5648DTthat 's5649VBZbe an5650DTan important5651JJimportant point5652NNpoint ,5653,, Justice5654NPJustice Gorsuch5655NPGorsuch ,5656,, is5657VBZbe that5658IN/thatthat the5659DTthe EPA5660NPEPA plan5661NNplan fully5662RBfully complies5663VVZcomply with5664INwith the5665DTthe state5666NNstate environmental5667JJenvironmental laws5668NNSlaw .5669SENT. Those5670DTthose are5671VBPbe the5672DTthe ARARs5673NNSARARs that5674IN/thatthat I5675PPI mentioned5676VVDmention earlier5677RBRearlier .5678SENT. This5679DTthis is5680VBZbe a5681DTa separate5682JJseparate private5683JJprivate plan5684NNplan that5685IN/thatthat a5686DTa jury5687NNjury would5688MDwould have5689VHhave to5690TOto approve5691VVapprove .5692SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5693LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank5694VVthank you5695PPyou ,5696,, counsel5697NNcounsel .5698SENT. Mr5699NPMr .5700SENT. Palmore5701NPPalmore .5702SENT.

[MR. PALMORE]5703LOC[MR. PALMORE] Thank5704VVthank you5705PPyou ,5706,, Mr5707NPMr .5708SENT. Chief5709NPChief Justice5710NPJustice ,5711,, and5712CCand may5713MDmay it5714PPit please5715VVplease the5716DTthe Court5717NPCourt :5718:: This5719DTthis Court5720NPCourt lacks5721VVZlack jurisdiction5722NNjurisdiction ,5723,, but5724CCbut ,5725,, if5726INif it5727PPit finds5728VVZfind it5729PPit has5730VHZhave jurisdiction5731NNjurisdiction ,5732,, it5733PPit should5734MDshould affirm5735VVaffirm .5736SENT. Briefly5737RBbriefly on5738INon jurisdiction5739NNjurisdiction :5740:: The5741DTthe decision5742NNdecision below5743INbelow affirming5744VVGaffirm denial5745NNdenial of5746INof summary5747NNsummary judgment5748NNjudgment on5749INon one5750CDone damages5751NNSdamage theory5752NNtheory and5753CCand remanding5754VVGremand for5755INfor trial5756NNtrial is5757VBZbe non-final5758JJnon-final .5759SENT. This5760DTthis Court5761NPCourt has5762VHZhave exercised5763VVNexercise review5764NNreview over5765INover Montana5766NPMontana 's5767POS's supervisory5768JJsupervisory writ5769NNwrit decisions5770NNSdecision only5771RBonly where5772WRBwhere reversal5773NNreversal by5774INby this5775DTthis Court5776NPCourt would5777MDwould end5778VVend the5779DTthe case5780NNcase entirely5781RBentirely .5782SENT. That5783DTthat critical5784JJcritical condition5785NNcondition is5786VBZbe absent5787JJabsent here5788RBhere .5789SENT. On5790INon the5791DTthe merits5792NNSmerit :5793:: This5794DTthis Court5795NPCourt held5796VVNhold and5797CCand explained5798VVNexplain in5799INin CTS5800NPCTS versus5801CCversus Waldburger5802NPWaldburger ...5803:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5804LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] If5805INif we5806PPwe ...5807:... I5808PPI 'm5809VBPbe sorry5810JJsorry ,5811,, go5812VVgo ahead5813RBahead .5814SENT. [MR. PALMORE]5815LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...5816:... that5817WDTthat CERCLA5818NPCERCLA does5819VVZdo not5820RBnot establish5821VVestablish a5822DTa comprehensive5823JJcomprehensive remedial5824JJremedial framework5825NNframework ;5826:; instead5827RBinstead ,5828,, it5829PPit leaves5830VVZleave untouched5831JJuntouched state5832NNstate judgments5833NNSjudgment about5834INabout causes5835NNScause of5836INof action5837NNaction and5838CCand the5839DTthe scope5840NNscope of5841INof liability5842NNliability for5843INfor property5844NNproperty damage5845NNdamage .5846SENT. Montana5847NPMontana ,5848,, like5849INlike many5850JJmany other5851JJother states5852NNSstate ,5853,, has5854VHZhave made5855VVNmake the5856DTthe judgment5857NNjudgment that5858DTthat one5859CDone who5860WPwho puts5861VVZput toxic5862JJtoxic materials5863NNSmaterial on5864INon another5865DTanother person5866NNperson 's5867POS's property5868NNproperty is5869VBZbe liable5870JJliable for5871INfor trespass5872NNtrespass and5873CCand nuisance5874JJnuisance and5875CCand that5876IN/thatthat a5877DTa measure5878NNmeasure of5879INof recovery5880NNrecovery is5881VBZbe the5882DTthe cost5883NNcost of5884INof removal5885NNremoval .5886SENT. Nothing5887NNnothing in5888INin CERCLA5889NPCERCLA bars5890VVZbar that5891IN/thatthat core5892JJcore exercise5893NNexercise of5894INof state5895NNstate authority5896NNauthority to5897TOto vindicate5898VVvindicate private5899JJprivate property5900NNproperty rights5901NNSright .5902SENT. ARCO5903NPARCO 's5904POS's invocation5905NNinvocation of5906INof Section5907NPSection 1135908CD@card@ (5909(( h5910NNh )5911)) fails5912VVZfail ...5913:... that5914WDTthat 's5915VBZbe the5916DTthe challenge5917NNchallenge provision5918NNprovision ...5919:... because5920INbecause it5921PPit does5922VVZdo n't5923RBn't apply5924VVapply in5925INin federal5926JJfederal court5927NNcourt and5928CCand even5929RBeven in5930INin federal5931JJfederal court5932NNcourt ,5933,, it5934PPit does5935VVZdo n't5936RBn't apply5937VVapply to5938TOto state5939VVstate law5940NNlaw claims5941NNSclaim .5942SENT. ARCO5943NPARCO fares5944VVZfare no5945RBno better5946JJRgood on5947INon Section5948NPSection 1225949CD@card@ (5950(( e5951LSe )5952)) (5953(( 65954CD6 )5955)) ,5956,, the5957DTthe PRP5958NPPRP provision5959NNprovision ,5960,, because5961INbecause the5962DTthe landowners5963NNSlandowner here5964RBhere are5965VBPbe not5966RBnot potentially5967RBpotentially responsible5968JJresponsible for5969INfor anything5970NNanything because5971INbecause they5972PPthey face5973VVPface no5974DTno possible5975JJpossible liability5976NNliability .5977SENT. And5978CCand that5979DTthat provision5980NNprovision certainly5981RBcertainly cannot5982MDcan be5983VBbe read5984VVNread to5985TOto give5986VVgive EPA5987NPEPA the5988DTthe vast5989JJvast power5990NNpower that5991IN/thatthat it5992PPit seeks5993VVZseek ,5994,, the5995DTthe ability5996NNability to5997TOto control5998VVcontrol forever5999RBforever the6000DTthe removal6001NNremoval of6002INof a6003DTa shovelful6004NNshovelful of6005INof dirt6006NNdirt from6007INfrom a6008DTa private6009JJprivate landowner6010NNlandowner 's6011POS's backyard6012NNbackyard .6013SENT. There6014EXthere 's6015VBZbe no6016DTno basis6017NNbasis for6018INfor preemption6019NNpreemption either6020RBeither .6021SENT. CERCLA6022NPCERCLA establishes6023VVZestablish a6024DTa floor6025NNfloor ,6026,, not6027RBnot a6028DTa ceiling6029NNceiling ,6030,, on6031INon environmental6032JJenvironmental remediation6033NNremediation ,6034,, and6035CCand in6036INin several6037JJseveral provisions6038NNSprovision makes6039VVZmake clear6040JJclear that6041IN/thatthat Congress6042NPCongress wanted6043VVDwant to6044TOto leave6045VVleave state6046NNstate law6047NNlaw in6048INin place6049NNplace .6050SENT. Nor6051CCnor is6052VBZbe there6053RBthere any6054DTany impossibility6055NNimpossibility .6056SENT. The6057DTthe duty6058NNduty that6059IN/thatthat ARCO6060NPARCO breached6061VVDbreach was6062VBDbe the6063DTthe duty6064NNduty not6065RBnot to6066TOto pollute6067VVpollute .6068SENT. Nothing6069NNnothing in6070INin federal6071JJfederal law6072NNlaw required6073VVDrequire it6074PPit to6075TOto do6076VVdo so6077RBso .6078SENT. Justice6079NPJustice Sotomayor6080NPSotomayor ?6081SENT? [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6082LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I6083PPI ...6084:... I6085PPI still6086RBstill have6087VHPhave a6088DTa problem6089NNproblem ,6090,, which6091WDTwhich is6092VBZbe it6093PPit seems6094VVZseem to6095TOto me6096PPme that6097IN/thatthat if6098INif you6099PPyou go6100VVPgo on6101INon a6102DTa piece6103NNpiece of6104INof ...6105:... if6106INif you6107PPyou own6108VVPown a6109DTa piece6110NNpiece of6111INof land6112NNland and6113CCand you6114PPyou know6115VVPknow the6116DTthe EPA6117NPEPA has6118VHZhave been6119VBNbe fixing6120VVGfix it6121PPit up6122RPup ,6123,, that6124IN/thatthat whether6125INwhether you6126PPyou 're6127VBPbe responsible6128JJresponsible financially6129RBfinancially for6130INfor the6131DTthe cleanup6132NNcleanup ,6133,, that6134WDTthat you6135PPyou should6136MDshould n't6137RBn't be6138VBbe able6139JJable to6140TOto interfere6141VVinterfere with6142INwith the6143DTthe EPA6144NPEPA 's6145POS's efforts6146NNSeffort ,6147,, meaning6148VVGmean you6149PPyou might6150MDmight have6151VHhave a6152DTa takings6153NNStaking claim6154VVPclaim ,6155,, as6156INas Justice6157NPJustice Gorsuch6158NPGorsuch claims6159VVZclaim ,6160,, you6161PPyou might6162MDmight have6163VHhave some6164DTsome other6165JJother claims6166NNSclaim ,6167,, but6168CCbut I6169PPI do6170VVPdo n't6171RBn't know6172VVknow how6173WRBhow you6174PPyou can6175MDcan go6176VVgo about6177INabout instituting6178VVGinstitute a6179DTa plan6180NNplan without6181INwithout conflict6182NNconflict preemption6183NNpreemption ,6184,, instituting6185VVGinstitute a6186DTa plan6187NNplan that6188WDTthat interferes6189VVZinterfere with6190INwith what6191WPwhat the6192DTthe EPA6193NPEPA is6194VBZbe doing6195VVGdo .6196SENT. [MR. PALMORE]6197LOC[MR. PALMORE] Your6198PP$your Honor6199NPHonor ,6200,, first6201JJfirst of6202INof all6203DTall ,6204,, and6205CCand this6206DTthis is6207VBZbe critical6208JJcritical ,6209,, there6210EXthere is6211VBZbe no6212DTno interference6213NNinterference here6214RBhere .6215SENT. The6216DTthe vast6217JJvast majority6218NNmajority of6219INof my6220PP$my clients6221NNSclient have6222VHPhave had6223VHNhave zero6224CDzero work6225NNwork done6226VVNdo on6227INon their6228PP$their land6229NNland .6230SENT. And6231CCand if6232INif you6233PPyou put6234VVPput all6235PDTall their6236PP$their land6237NNland together6238RBtogether ,6239,, the6240DTthe work6241NNwork has6242VHZhave been6243VBNbe done6244VVNdo on6245INon only6246JJonly percent6247NNpercent ,6248,, okay6249JJokay ?6250SENT? So6251RBso ,6252,, on6253INon 956254CD@card@ percent6255NNpercent of6256INof the6257DTthe land6258NNland ,6259,, literally6260RBliterally nothing6261NNnothing has6262VHZhave been6263VBNbe done6264VVNdo .6265SENT. So6266RBso there6267EXthere 's6268VBZbe no6269DTno undoing6270NNundoing there6271RBthere .6272SENT. On6273INon groundwater6274NNgroundwater ,6275,, EPA6276NPEPA made6277VVDmake the6278DTthe decision6279NNdecision to6280TOto do6281VVdo nothing6282NNnothing to6283TOto clean6284VVclean the6285DTthe groundwater6286NNgroundwater in6287INin Opportunity6288NPOpportunity ,6289,, so6290RBso we6291PPwe 're6292VBPbe not6293RBnot undoing6294VVGundo a6295DTa remedy6296NNremedy .6297SENT. We6298PPwe 're6299VBPbe doing6300VVGdo something6301NNsomething that6302IN/thatthat EPA6303NPEPA ...6304:... where6305WRBwhere EPA6306NPEPA has6307VHZhave done6308VVNdo nothing6309NNnothing .6310SENT. And6311CCand what6312WPwhat 's6313VBZbe the6314DTthe 56315CD5 percent6316NNpercent ?6317SENT? They6318PPthey dug6319VVDdig down6320RBdown 186321CD@card@ inches6322NNSinch ,6323,, they6324PPthey put6325VVDput in6326INin clean6327JJclean soil6328NNsoil ,6329,, and6330CCand they6331PPthey planted6332VVDplant grass6333NNgrass .6334SENT. All6335RBall we6336PPwe want6337VVPwant to6338TOto do6339VVdo ...6340:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]6341LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well6342UHWell ,6343,, on6344INon the6345DTthe ground6346NNground ...6347:... on6348INon the6349DTthe groundwater6350NNgroundwater ,6351,, I6352PPI understand6353VVPunderstand their6354PP$their position6355NNposition to6356TOto be6357VBbe that6358IN/thatthat if6359INif they6360PPthey did6361VVDdo do6362VVdo something6363NNsomething along6364INalong the6365DTthe lines6366NNSline that6367IN/thatthat you6368PPyou 're6369VBPbe proposing6370VVGpropose ,6371,, it6372PPit would6373MDwould have6374VHhave very6375RBvery significant6376JJsignificant adverse6377JJadverse impacts6378NNSimpact .6379SENT. So6380INso the6381DTthe fact6382NNfact that6383IN/thatthat they6384PPthey have6385VHPhave n't6386RBn't done6387VVNdo anything6388NNanything ,6389,, that6390WDTthat 's6391VBZbe what6392WPwhat they6393PPthey want6394VVPwant you6395PPyou ...6396:... they6397PPthey do6398VVPdo n't6399RBn't want6400VVwant you6401PPyou to6402TOto do6403VVdo anything6404NNanything .6405SENT. So6406RBso you6407PPyou can6408MDcan 't6409RB't say6410VVsay having6411VHGhave ...6412:... having6413VHGhave done6414VVNdo nothing6415NNnothing represents6416VVZrepresent that6417IN/thatthat there6418EXthere 's6419VBZbe no6420DTno ...6421:... there6422EXthere would6423MDwould be6424VBbe no6425DTno adverse6426JJadverse impact6427NNimpact from6428INfrom what6429WPwhat you6430PPyou plan6431VVPplan to6432TOto do6433VVdo .6434SENT. [MR. PALMORE]6435LOC[MR. PALMORE] A6436DTa couple6437NNcouple answers6438VVZanswer on6439INon that6440DTthat ,6441,, Chief6442NPChief Justice6443NPJustice Roberts6444NPRoberts .6445SENT. First6446JJfirst of6447INof all6448DTall ,6449,, they6450PPthey decided6451VVDdecide ,6452,, and6453CCand if6454INif you6455PPyou look6456VVPlook at6457INat the6458DTthe actual6459JJactual regulatory6460JJregulatory materials6461NNSmaterial ,6462,, and6463CCand that6464DTthat ...6465:... the6466DTthe EPA6467NPEPA makes6468VVZmake decisions6469NNSdecision in6470INin this6471DTthis area6472NNarea through6473INthrough records6474NNSrecord of6475INof decision6476NNdecision ,6477,, which6478WDTwhich are6479VBPbe official6480JJofficial documents6481NNSdocument ,6482,, they6483PPthey say6484VVPsay they6485PPthey did6486VVDdo n't6487RBn't want6488VVwant to6489TOto do6490VVdo the6491DTthe groundwater6492NNgroundwater remedy6493NNremedy ,6494,, it6495PPit was6496VBDbe a6497DTa different6498JJdifferent wall6499NNwall ,6500,, it6501PPit was6502VBDbe a6503DTa different6504JJdifferent one6505CDone ,6506,, because6507INbecause it6508PPit was6509VBDbe technically6510RBtechnically impracticable6511JJimpracticable ,6512,, which6513WDTwhich is6514VBZbe a6515DTa term6516NNterm of6517INof art6518NNart under6519INunder CERCLA6520NPCERCLA for6521INfor too6522RBtoo expensive6523JJexpensive .6524SENT. In6525INin the6526DTthe regulatory6527JJregulatory materials6528NNSmaterial ,6529,, there6530EXthere is6531VBZbe absolutely6532RBabsolutely no6533DTno finding6534NNfinding that6535IN/thatthat that6536DTthat wall6537NNwall ,6538,, much6539RBmuch less6540JJRless the6541DTthe one6542CDone that6543IN/thatthat we6544PPwe 've6545VHPhave proposed6546VVNpropose which6547WDTwhich is6548VBZbe different6549JJdifferent ,6550,, would6551MDwould call6552VVcall any6553DTany environmental6554JJenvironmental harm6555NNharm .6556SENT. If6557INif you6558PPyou look6559VVPlook to6560TOto what6561WPwhat the6562DTthe government6563NNgovernment cites6564VVZcite here6565RBhere for6566INfor that6567DTthat proposition6568NNproposition ,6569,, if6570INif you6571PPyou trace6572VVPtrace it6573PPit through6574RPthrough ,6575,, it6576PPit 's6577VBZbe citing6578VVGcite its6579PP$its own6580JJown amicus6581NNamicus brief6582NNbrief in6583INin the6584DTthe Montana6585NPMontana Supreme6586NPSupreme Court6587NPCourt .6588SENT. If6589INif you6590PPyou look6591VVPlook at6592INat the6593DTthe Montana6594NPMontana Supreme6595NPSupreme Court6596NPCourt amicus6597NNamicus brief6598NNbrief ,6599,, the6600DTthe government6601NNgovernment cites6602VVZcite literally6603RBliterally nothing6604NNnothing .6605SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]6606LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] So6607INso you6608PPyou 're6609VBPbe talking6610VVGtalk about6611INabout the6612DTthe particular6613JJparticular specifics6614NNSspecific in6615INin your6616PP$your case6617NNcase .6618SENT. But6619CCbut ,6620,, as6621INas a6622DTa general6623JJgeneral matter6624NNmatter ,6625,, for6626INfor example6627NNexample ,6628,, you6629PPyou can6630MDcan understand6631VVunderstand that6632IN/thatthat the6633DTthe EPA6634NPEPA looking6635VVGlook at6636INat this6637DTthis might6638MDmight say6639VVsay ,6640,, okay6641RBokay ,6642,, we6643PPwe 're6644VBPbe going6645VVGgo to6646TOto do6647VVdo this6648DTthis ,6649,, we6650PPwe 're6651VBPbe going6652VVGgo to6653TOto do6654VVdo this6655DTthis ,6656,, we6657PPwe 're6658VBPbe going6659VVGgo to6660TOto do6661VVdo this6662DTthis ,6663,, and6664CCand we6665PPwe 're6666VBPbe going6667VVGgo to6668TOto get6669VVget to6670TOto that6671DTthat as6672RBas soon6673RBsoon as6674INas we6675PPwe 're6676VBPbe done6677VVNdo doing6678VVGdo this6679DTthis other6680JJother stuff6681NNstuff .6682SENT. And6683CCand yet6684RByet someone6685NNsomeone else6686RBelse in6687INin your6688PP$your position6689NNposition would6690MDwould come6691VVcome in6692RPin and6693CCand say6694VVsay :6695:: Well6696UHWell ,6697,, you6698PPyou 're6699VBPbe not6700RBnot doing6701VVGdo anything6702NNanything here6703RBhere ,6704,, and6705CCand so6706RBso we6707PPwe 're6708VBPbe going6709VVGgo to6710TOto go6711VVgo ahead6712RBahead and6713CCand do6714VVdo this6715DTthis ,6716,, when6717WRBwhen the6718DTthe EPA6719NPEPA 's6720POS's answer6721NNanswer might6722MDmight simply6723RBsimply be6724VBbe that6725IN/thatthat well6726RBwell ,6727,, we6728PPwe have6729VHPhave n't6730RBn't gotten6731VVNget to6732TOto it6733PPit yet6734RByet ,6735,, but6736CCbut we6737PPwe want6738VVPwant to6739TOto be6740VBbe the6741DTthe ones6742NNSone to6743TOto decide6744VVdecide what6745WPwhat to6746TOto do6747VVdo ,6748,, rather6749RBrather than6750INthan the6751DTthe particular6752JJparticular landowners6753NNSlandowner there6754RBthere ,6755,, because6756INbecause we6757PPwe have6758VHPhave a6759DTa broader6760JJRbroad perspective6761NNperspective affecting6762VVGaffect the6763DTthe whole6764JJwhole site6765NNsite ,6766,, rather6767RBrather than6768INthan individual6769JJindividual sites6770NNSsite where6771WRBwhere the6772DTthe people6773NNSpeople may6774MDmay reasonably6775RBreasonably want6776VVwant something6777NNsomething to6778TOto be6779VBbe done6780VVNdo but6781CCbut still6782RBstill may6783MDmay be6784VBbe inconsistent6785JJinconsistent with6786INwith EPA6787NPEPA 's6788POS's plan6789NNplan .6790SENT. [MR. PALMORE]6791LOC[MR. PALMORE] Well6792UHWell ,6793,, here6794RBhere ,6795,, Mr6796NPMr .6797SENT. Chief6798NPChief Justice6799NPJustice ,6800,, the6801DTthe issue6802NNissue is6803VBZbe n't6804RBn't we6805PPwe 'll6806MDwill get6807VVget to6808TOto that6809DTthat later6810RBRlater .6811SENT. They6812PPthey 're6813VBPbe done6814VVNdo .6815SENT. All6816PDTAll the6817DTthe remedial6818JJremedial work6819NNwork such6820JJsuch as6821INas it6822PPit was6823VBDbe on6824INon our6825PP$our property6826NNproperty has6827VHZhave been6828VBNbe over6829INover for6830INfor several6831JJseveral years6832NNSyear .6833SENT. They6834PPthey are6835VBPbe completely6836RBcompletely done6837VVNdo .6838SENT. And6839CCand that6840DTthat 's6841VBZbe another6842DTanother reason6843NNreason why6844WRBwhy there6845EXthere 's6846VBZbe no6847DTno interference6848NNinterference with6849INwith anything6850NNanything they6851PPthey 're6852VBPbe doing6853VVGdo .6854SENT. They6855PPthey 're6856VBPbe finished6857VVNfinish .6858SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]6859LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I6860PPI 'm6861VBPbe trying6862VVGtry to6863TOto move6864VVmove beyond6865INbeyond your6866PP$your particular6867NNparticular ...6868:... [MR. PALMORE]6869LOC[MR. PALMORE] And6870CCand I6871PPI understand6872VVPunderstand that6873RBthat .6874SENT. So6875RBso one6876PPone can6877MDcan imagine6878VVimagine a6879DTa different6880JJdifferent case6881NNcase involving6882VVGinvolve a6883DTa conflict6884NNconflict preemption6885NNpreemption claim6886NNclaim with6887INwith respect6888NNrespect to6889TOto the6890DTthe EPA6891NPEPA remedial6892JJremedial orders6893NNSorder .6894SENT. That6895DTthat 's6896VBZbe not6897RBnot this6898DTthis case6899NNcase .6900SENT. ARCO6901NPARCO 's6902POS's argument6903NNargument here6904RBhere ,6905,, which6906WDTwhich ...6907:... which6908WDTwhich Ms6909NNMs .6910SENT. Blatt6911NPBlatt articulated6912VVDarticulate ,6913,, is6914VBZbe that6915IN/thatthat CERCLA6916NPCERCLA itself6917PPitself establishes6918VVZestablish a6919DTa floor6920NNfloor and6921CCand a6922DTa ceiling6923NNceiling ,6924,, such6925JJsuch that6926IN/thatthat any6927DTany state6928NNstate law6929NNlaw remedy6930NNremedy that6931WDTthat goes6932VVZgo beyond6933INbeyond even6934RBeven one6935CDone inch6936NNinch beyond6937INbeyond what6938WPwhat CERC6939NPCERC ...6940:... what6941WPwhat a6942DTa remedial6943JJremedial order6944NNorder required6945VVNrequire is6946VBZbe preempted6947VVNpreempt .6948SENT. They6949PPthey are6950VBPbe not6951RBnot making6952VVGmake a6953DTa very6954RBvery different6955JJdifferent argument6956NNargument that6957IN/thatthat in6958INin ...6959:... perhaps6960RBperhaps in6961INin a6962DTa case6963NNcase like6964INlike Your6965PP$your Honor6966NPHonor is6967VBZbe referring6968VVGrefer to6969TOto could6970MDcould be6971VBbe made6972VVNmake ,6973,, which6974WDTwhich there6975RBthere could6976MDcould be6977VBbe an6978DTan argument6979NNargument made6980VVDmake that6981IN/thatthat there6982EXthere is6983VBZbe obstacle6984NNobstacle preemption6985NNpreemption with6986INwith respect6987NNrespect to6988TOto an6989DTan actual6990JJactual remedial6991JJremedial order6992NNorder .6993SENT. That6994DTthat case6995NNcase might6996MDmight look6997VVlook a6998DTa lot6999NNlot like7000INlike Geier7001NPGeier ,7002,, right7003RBright ?7004SENT? So7005RBso if7006INif in7007INin a7008DTa ...7009:... in7010INin a7011DTa case7012NNcase EPA7013NPEPA had7014VHDhave evaluated7015VVNevaluate various7016JJvarious remedies7017NNSremedy and7018CCand it7019PPit had7020VHDhave rejected7021VVNreject a7022DTa remedy7023NNremedy because7024INbecause it7025PPit said7026VVDsay that7027IN/thatthat remedy7028NNremedy will7029MDwill cause7030VVcause environmental7031JJenvironmental harm7032NNharm ,7033,, so7034RBso we7035PPwe choose7036VVPchoose not7037RBnot to7038TOto adopt7039VVadopt it7040PPit ...7041:... [JUSTICE BREYER]7042LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No7043NPNo ,7044,, the7045DTthe problem7046NNproblem is7047VBZbe n't7048RBn't ...7049:... I7050PPI do7051VVPdo n't7052RBn't think7053VVthink the7054DTthe problem7055NNproblem we7056PPwe 're7057VBPbe stating7058VVGstate is7059VBZbe anything7060NNanything to7061TOto do7062VVdo with7063INwith preemption7064NNpreemption or7065CCor anything7066NNanything .7067SENT. It7068PPit 's7069VBZbe just7070RBjust whether7071INwhether someone7072NNsomeone in7073INin your7074PP$your position7075NNposition should7076MDshould first7077RBfirst have7078VHhave to7079TOto go7080VVgo and7081CCand get7082VVget the7083DTthe EPA7084NPEPA 's7085POS's permission7086NNpermission .7087SENT. And7088CCand you7089PPyou 're7090VBPbe talking7091VVGtalk about7092INabout a7093DTa shovel7094NNshovel of7095INof dirt7096NNdirt or7097CCor something7098NNsomething .7099SENT. Suppose7100VVsuppose they7101PPthey did7102VVDdo do7103VVdo something7104NNsomething like7105INlike that7106DTthat .7107SENT. Is7108VBZbe n't7109RBn't there7110RBthere a7111DTa remedy7112NNremedy ?7113SENT? It7114PPit 's7115VHZhave called7116VVNcall the7117DTthe Administrative7118NPAdministrative Procedures7119NPSProcedures Act7120NPAct .7121SENT. And7122CCand you7123PPyou say7124VVPsay here7125RBhere they7126PPthey 've7127VHPhave made7128VVNmake an7129DTan administrative7130JJadministrative procedure7131NNprocedure ,7132,, and7133CCand it7134PPit was7135VBDbe arbitrary7136JJarbitrary ,7137,, capricious7138JJcapricious ,7139,, and7140CCand abuse7141NNabuse of7142INof discretion7143NNdiscretion .7144SENT. That7145DTthat way7146NNway ,7147,, as7148INas the7149DTthe Chief7150NPChief said7151VVDsay ,7152,, as7153INas others7154NNSother say7155VVPsay ,7156,, we7157PPwe channel7158VVPchannel all7159PDTall this7160DTthis through7161INthrough the7162DTthe EPA7163NPEPA and7164CCand the7165DTthe courts7166NNScourt reviewing7167VVGreview the7168DTthe EPA7169NPEPA .7170SENT. And7171CCand what7172WPwhat we7173PPwe do7174VVPdo n't7175RBn't have7176VHhave is7177VBZbe 10,0007178CD@card@ juries7179NNSjury or7180CCor ...7181:... or7182CCor 507183CD@card@ states7184NNSstate or7185CCor whatever7186WDTwhatever it7187PPit is7188VBZbe imposing7189VVGimpose sometimes7190RBsometimes conflicting7191JJconflicting duties7192NNSduty and7193CCand leaving7194VVGleave it7195PPit up7196RPup to7197TOto hundreds7198NNShundred of7199INof different7200JJdifferent judges7201NNSjudge to7202TOto decide7203VVdecide .7204SENT. [MR. PALMORE]7205LOC[MR. PALMORE] Your7206PP$your Honor7207NPHonor ,7208,, a7209DTa couple7210NNcouple answers7211NNSanswer .7212SENT. One7213PPone is7214VBZbe EPA7215NPEPA does7216VVZdo n't7217RBn't need7218VVneed this7219DTthis 1227220CD@card@ (7221(( e7222LSe )7223)) (7224(( 67225CD6 )7226)) ,7227,, which7228WDTwhich is7229VBZbe what7230WPwhat you7231PPyou 're7232VBPbe referring7233VVGrefer to7234TOto ,7235,, to7236TOto prevent7237VVprevent harm7238NNharm at7239INat a7240DTa Superfund7241NPSuperfund site7242NNsite or7243CCor protect7244VVprotect the7245DTthe integrity7246NNintegrity of7247INof its7248PP$its remedy7249NNremedy .7250SENT. The7251DTthe government7252NNgovernment made7253VVDmake that7254DTthat point7255NNpoint at7256INat page7257NNpage 177258CD@card@ of7259INof its7260PP$its invitation7261NNinvitation brief7262NNbrief .7263SENT. It7264PPit said7265VVDsay we7266PPwe have7267VHPhave plenty7268NNplenty of7269INof tools7270NNStool .7271SENT. We7272PPwe can7273MDcan get7274VVget administrative7275JJadministrative orders7276NNSorder .7277SENT. We7278PPwe can7279MDcan get7280VVget injunctions7281NNSinjunction .7282SENT. There7283EXthere 's7284VBZbe no7285DTno problem7286NNproblem here7287RBhere .7288SENT. We7289PPwe can7290MDcan use7291VVuse those7292DTthose tools7293NNStool to7294TOto protect7295VVprotect the7296DTthe integrity7297NNintegrity of7298INof our7299PP$our ...7300:... of7301INof our7302PP$our remedy7303NNremedy .7304SENT. 1227305CD@card@ (7306(( e7307LSe )7308)) (7309(( 67310CD6 )7311)) applies7312VVZapply only7313RBonly to7314TOto potentially7315RBpotentially responsible7316JJresponsible parties7317NNSparty .7318SENT. What7319WPWhat is7320VBZbe a7321DTa potentially7322RBpotentially responsible7323JJresponsible party7324NNparty ?7325SENT? It7326PPit is7327VBZbe not7328RBnot defined7329VVNdefine in7330INin the7331DTthe statute7332NNstatute .7333SENT. So7334RBso ,7335,, under7336INunder normal7337JJnormal rules7338NNSrule of7339INof statutory7340JJstatutory construction7341NNconstruction ,7342,, this7343DTthis Court7344NPCourt looks7345VVZlook to7346TOto what7347WPwhat does7348VVZdo that7349DTthat mean7350NNmean .7351SENT. Is7352VBZbe someone7353NNsomeone potentially7354RBpotentially responsible7355JJresponsible if7356INif they7357PPthey face7358VVPface no7359DTno prospect7360NNprospect of7361INof liability7362NNliability ?7363SENT? No7364UHNo ,7365,, they7366PPthey 're7367VBPbe not7368RBnot potentially7369RBpotentially responsible7370JJresponsible .7371SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]7372LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I7373PPI ...7374:... I7375PPI ...7376:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]7377LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] It7378PPit 's7379VHZhave been7380VBNbe said7381VVNsay they7382PPthey are7383VBPbe covered7384VVNcover parties7385NNSparty .7386SENT. And7387CCand who7388WPwho is7389VBZbe a7390DTa covered7391JJcovered party7392NNparty that7393WDTthat is7394VBZbe not7395RBnot a7396DTa potentially7397RBpotentially responsible7398JJresponsible party7399NNparty ?7400SENT? The7401DTthe ...7402:... the7403DTthe ...7404:... we7405PPwe are7406VBPbe told7407VVNtell that7408IN/thatthat this7409DTthis Court7410NPCourt has7411VHZhave equated7412VVNequate the7413DTthe term7414NNterm "7415``" covered7416JJcovered party7417NNparty "7418''" with7419INwith personally7420RBpersonally responsible7421JJresponsible party7422NNparty ,7423,, that7424IN/thatthat a7425DTa covered7426VVNcover party7427NNparty is7428VBZbe a7429DTa potentially7430RBpotentially responsible7431JJresponsible party7432NNparty .7433SENT. And7434CCand you7435PPyou say7436VVPsay that7437WDTthat 's7438VBZbe not7439RBnot right7440RBright ,7441,, they7442PPthey 're7443VBPbe not7444RBnot one7445CDone and7446CCand the7447DTthe same7448JJsame thing7449NNthing .7450SENT. So7451RBso who7452WPwho is7453VBZbe a7454DTa covered7455JJcovered party7456NNparty but7457CCbut would7458MDwould not7459RBnot be7460VBbe a7461DTa potentially7462RBpotentially responsible7463JJresponsible party7464NNparty ?7465SENT? [MR. PALMORE]7466LOC[MR. PALMORE] There7467EXthere could7468MDcould be7469VBbe a7470DTa number7471NNnumber of7472INof ways7473NNSway .7474SENT. And7475CCand you7476PPyou 're7477VBPbe right7478RBright ,7479,, Justice7480NPJustice Ginsburg7481NPGinsburg ,7482,, that7483IN/thatthat this7484DTthis Court7485NPCourt has7486VHZhave ,7487,, as7488INas shorthand7489NNshorthand ,7490,, used7491VVDuse the7492DTthe two7493CDtwo ,7494,, linked7495VVDlink the7496DTthe two7497CDtwo .7498SENT. And7499CCand the7500DTthe concepts7501NNSconcept are7502VBPbe clearly7503RBclearly linked7504VVNlink .7505SENT. All7506DTall potentially7507RBpotentially responsible7508JJresponsible parties7509NNSparty have7510VHPhave to7511TOto at7512INat one7513CDone point7514NNpoint been7515VBNbe covered7516VVNcover persons7517NNSperson .7518SENT. But7519CCbut a7520DTa covered7521VVNcover person7522NNperson would7523MDwould include7524VVinclude a7525DTa residential7526JJresidential landowner7527NNlandowner with7528INwith certain7529JJcertain exceptions7530NNSexception .7531SENT. Justice7532NPJustice Sotomayor7533NPSotomayor ,7534,, you7535PPyou asked7536VVDask about7537INabout the7538DTthe contiguous7539JJcontiguous landowner7540NNlandowner defense7541NNdefense .7542SENT. If7543INif you7544PPyou look7545VVPlook at7546INat that7547IN/thatthat ,7548,, that7549WDTthat is7550VBZbe a7551DTa carveout7552NNcarveout from7553INfrom the7554DTthe definition7555NNdefinition of7556INof owner7557NNowner ,7558,, so7559INso someone7560NNsomeone who7561WPwho establishes7562VVZestablish the7563DTthe requirements7564NNSrequirement that7565IN/thatthat that7566DTthat carveout7567NNcarveout is7568VBZbe not7569RBnot even7570RBeven an7571DTan owner7572NNowner ,7573,, so7574RBso ,7575,, under7576INunder ARCO7577NPARCO 's7578POS's view7579NNview ,7580,, where7581WRBwhere all7582DTall owners7583NNSowner under7584INunder Section7585NPSection 1077586CD@card@ are7587VBPbe potentially7588RBpotentially responsible7589JJresponsible parties7590NNSparty ,7591,, those7592DTthose who7593WPwho satisfy7594VVPsatisfy that7595IN/thatthat defense7596NNdefense and7597CCand the7598DTthe bona7599NNbona fide7600NNfide purchaser7601NNpurchaser defense7602NNdefense are7603VBPbe n't7604RBn't even7605RBeven owners7606NNSowner .7607SENT. But7608CCbut ,7609,, more7610RBRmore importantly7611RBimportantly ,7612,, Congress7613NPCongress could7614MDcould have7615VHhave said7616VVNsay in7617INin 1227618CD@card@ (7619(( e7620LSe )7621)) (7622(( 67623CD6 )7624)) all7625DTall 1077626CD@card@ covered7627JJcovered parties7628NNSparty have7629VHPhave to7630TOto get7631VVget EPA7632NPEPA permission7633NNpermission in7634INin order7635NNorder to7636TOto remove7637VVremove toxic7638JJtoxic waste7639NNwaste for7640INfor ...7641:... or7642CCor arsenic7643NNarsenic from7644INfrom their7645PP$their land7646NNland .7647SENT. It7648PPit did7649VVDdo n't7650RBn't say7651VVsay that7652DTthat .7653SENT. It7654PPit said7655VVDsay potentially7656RBpotentially responsible7657JJresponsible parties7658NNSparty .7659SENT. It7660PPit used7661VVDuse a7662DTa different7663JJdifferent term7664NNterm .7665SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7666LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well7667UHwell ,7668,, it7669PPit did7670VVDdo ...7671:... it7672PPit did7673VVDdo ,7674,, Mr7675NPMr .7676SENT. Palmore7677NPPalmore ,7678,, but7679CCbut ,7680,, under7681INunder your7682PP$your theory7683NNtheory ,7684,, how7685WRBhow would7686MDwould you7687PPyou decide7688VVdecide whether7689INwhether somebody7690NNsomebody is7691VBZbe a7692DTa potentially7693RBpotentially responsible7694JJresponsible party7695NNparty ?7696SENT? It7697PPit sounds7698VVZsound like7699INlike you7700PPyou would7701MDwould need7702VVneed a7703DTa court7704NNcourt adjudication7705NNadjudication to7706TOto do7707VVdo that7708DTthat .7709SENT. And7710CCand that7711WDTthat seems7712VVZseem unlikely7713JJunlikely that7714IN/thatthat Congress7715NPCongress meant7716VVDmean for7717INfor that7718IN/thatthat to7719TOto happen7720VVhappen .7721SENT. [MR. PALMORE]7722LOC[MR. PALMORE] Well7723UHWell ,7724,, Your7725PP$your Honor7726NPHonor ,7727,, I7728PPI do7729VVPdo n't7730RBn't think7731VVthink it7732PPit would7733MDwould necessarily7734RBnecessarily need7735VVneed a7736DTa court7737NNcourt adjudication7738NNadjudication .7739SENT. And7740CCand ,7741,, in7742INin fact7743NNfact ,7744,, the7745DTthe statute7746NNstatute puts7747VVZput the7748DTthe onus7749NNonus on7750INon EPA7751NPEPA .7752SENT. This7753DTthis is7754VBZbe Section7755NNsection 1137756CD@card@ (7757(( k7758NNk )7759)) (7760(( 27761LS2 )7762)) (7763(( D7764NPD )7765)) to7766TOto notify7767VVnotify ,7768,, identify7769VVidentify and7770CCand notify7771VVnotify all7772DTall potentially7773RBpotentially responsible7774JJresponsible parties7775NNSparty as7776INas early7777JJearly as7778INas it7779PPit can7780MDcan before7781INbefore taking7782VVGtake any7783DTany removal7784NNremoval action7785NNaction .7786SENT. So7787RBso ,7788,, here7789RBhere ,7790,, we7791PPwe 're7792VBPbe talking7793VVGtalk about7794RBabout in7795INin the7796DTthe 1980s7797NNS1980s .7798SENT. It7799PPit 's7800VBZbe on7801INon them7802PPthem to7803TOto identify7804VVidentify potentially7805RBpotentially responsible7806JJresponsible parties7807NNSparty and7808CCand send7809VVsend them7810PPthem a7811DTa letter7812NNletter .7813SENT. And7814CCand when7815WRBwhen there7816EXthere 's7817VBZbe settlement7818NNsettlement negotiations7819NNSnegotiation and7820CCand you7821PPyou referred7822VVDrefer to7823TOto this7824DTthis in7825INin Section7826NPSection 1227827CD@card@ ,7828,, they7829PPthey have7830VHPhave to7831TOto identify7832VVidentify all7833DTall potentially7834RBpotentially responsible7835JJresponsible parties7836NNSparty and7837CCand include7838VVinclude them7839PPthem .7840SENT. They7841PPthey never7842RBnever ...7843:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]7844LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So7845INso you7846PPyou 're7847VBPbe saying7848VVGsay that7849IN/thatthat even7850RBeven in7851INin the7852DTthe absence7853NNabsence of7854INof the7855DTthe statute7856NNstatute of7857INof limitations7858NNSlimitation issue7859NNissue ,7860,, these7861DTthese would7862MDwould not7863RBnot be7864VBbe potentially7865RBpotentially responsible7866JJresponsible parties7867NNSparty because7868INbecause the7869DTthe government7870NNgovernment is7871VBZbe subject7872JJsubject to7873TOto a7874DTa kind7875NNkind of7876INof estoppel7877NNestoppel principle7878NNprinciple ?7879SENT? [MR. PALMORE]7880LOC[MR. PALMORE] I7881PPI 'm7882VBPbe saying7883VVGsay that7884IN/thatthat if7885INif there7886EXthere is7887VBZbe some7888DTsome concern7889NNconcern about7890RBabout how7891WRBhow will7892MDwill we7893PPwe know7894VVknow who7895WPwho a7896DTa potentially7897RBpotentially responsible7898JJresponsible party7899NNparty is7900VBZbe ,7901,, the7902DTthe government7903NNgovernment has7904VHZhave tools7905NNStool to7906TOto at7907INat least7908JJSleast put7909VVput people7910NNSpeople on7911INon notice7912NNnotice that7913IN/thatthat it7914PPit thinks7915VVZthink they7916PPthey are7917VBPbe potentially7918RBpotentially responsible7919JJresponsible parties7920NNSparty .7921SENT. Now7922RBnow ,7923,, of7924INof course7925NNcourse ,7926,, it7927PPit might7928MDmight be7929VBbe wrong7930JJwrong .7931SENT. But7932CCbut ,7933,, in7934RBin ...7935:... in7936INin this7937DTthis case7938NNcase ,7939,, though7940RBthough ,7941,, we7942PPwe never7943RBnever got7944VVDget any7945DTany of7946INof those7947DTthose kinds7948NNSkind of7949INof notices7950NNSnotice .7951SENT. In7952INin the7953DTthe district7954NNdistrict court7955NNcourt in7956INin this7957DTthis case7958NNcase ,7959,, the7960DTthe government7961NNgovernment 's7962POS's brief7963NNbrief said7964VVDsay we7965PPwe take7966VVtake no7967DTno position7968NNposition on7969INon whether7970INwhether these7971DTthese landowners7972NNSlandowner are7973VBPbe potentially7974RBpotentially responsible7975JJresponsible parties7976NNSparty .7977SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]7978LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] They7979PPthey are7980VBPbe ...7981:... they7982PPthey ...7983:... they7984PPthey own7985VVPown land7986NNland that7987WDTthat contains7988VVZcontain hazardous7989JJhazardous substances7990NNSsubstance .7991SENT. I7992PPI thought7993VVDthink that7994IN/thatthat potentially7995RBpotentially responsible7996JJresponsible parties7997NNSparty are7998VBPbe people7999NNSpeople who8000WPwho own8001VVPown land8002NNland ,8003,, whether8004INwhether they8005PPthey have8006VHPhave any8007DTany fault8008NNfault or8009CCor not8010RBnot ,8011,, but8012CCbut their8013PP$their land8014NNland does8015VVZdo contain8016VVcontain hazardous8017JJhazardous substances8018NNSsubstance .8019SENT. [MR. PALMORE]8020LOC[MR. PALMORE] It8021PPit does8022VVZdo ,8023,, Justice8024NPJustice Ginsburg8025NPGinsburg .8026SENT. And8027CCand that8028DTthat makes8029VVZmake them8030PPthem owners8031NNSowner under8032INunder Section8033NPSection 1078034CD@card@ ,8035,, unless8036INunless they8037PPthey are8038VBPbe carved8039VVNcarve out8040RPout from8041INfrom that8042DTthat definition8043NNdefinition by8044INby one8045CDone of8046INof the8047DTthe defenses8048NNSdefense that8049IN/thatthat we8050PPwe were8051VBDbe talking8052VVGtalk about8053RBabout .8054SENT. That8055DTthat makes8056VVZmake them8057PPthem owners8058NNSowner ,8059,, but8060CCbut does8061VVZdo not8062RBnot use8063VVuse the8064DTthe phrase8065NNphrase "8066``" potentially8067RBpotentially responsible8068JJresponsible party8069NNparty .8070SENT. "8071``" And8072CCand I8073PPI think8074VVPthink there8075EXthere 's8076VBZbe a8077DTa ...8078:... there8079EXthere 's8080VBZbe a8081DTa critical8082JJcritical kind8083NNkind of8084INof elephants8085NNSelephant in8086INin a8087DTa mouse8088NNmouse hole8089NNhole aspect8090NNaspect to8091TOto this8092DTthis argument8093NNargument .8094SENT. Section8095NNsection 1228096CD@card@ ...8097:... and8098CCand we8099PPwe reproduce8100VVPreproduce all8101DTall of8102INof it8103PPit in8104INin the8105DTthe appendix8106NNappendix to8107TOto our8108PP$our brief8109NNbrief at8110INat 50a8111NP50a through8112INthrough 80a8113NP80a ...8114:... is8115VBZbe all8116RBall about8117INabout settlement8118NNsettlement .8119SENT. If8120INif you8121PPyou read8122VVPread it8123PPit front8124JJfront to8125TOto back8126VVback ,8127,, it8128PPit 's8129VBZbe all8130RBall about8131INabout settlement8132NNsettlement .8133SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]8134LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] I8135PPI understood8136VVDunderstand ...8137:... [MR. PALMORE]8138LOC[MR. PALMORE] And8139CCand if8140INif that8141DTthat ...8142:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]8143LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...8144:... Ms8145NNMs .8146SENT. Blatt8147NPBlatt ,8148,, as8149INas I8150PPI ...8151:... because8152INbecause I8153PPI made8154VVDmake that8155DTthat point8156NNpoint to8157TOto her8158PPher ,8159,, and8160CCand I8161PPI thought8162VVDthink that8163IN/thatthat she8164PPshe said8165VVDsay to8166TOto me8167PPme that8168IN/thatthat there8169EXthere are8170VBPbe other8171JJother places8172NNSplace in8173INin the8174DTthe statute8175NNstatute which8176WDTwhich use8177VVPuse the8178DTthe term8179NNterm "8180``" potentially8181RBpotentially responsible8182JJresponsible parties8183NNSparty ,8184,, "8185``" so8186RBso that8187IN/thatthat it8188PPit 's8189VBZbe not8190RBnot all8191RBall about8192INabout settlement8193NNsettlement .8194SENT. [MR. PALMORE]8195LOC[MR. PALMORE] There8196EXthere are8197VBPbe a8198DTa few8199JJfew others8200NNSother ,8201,, most8202JJSmost of8203INof them8204PPthem refer8205VVPrefer back8206RBback to8207TOto the8208DTthe settlement8209NNsettlement provision8210NNprovision ,8211,, but8212CCbut I8213PPI think8214VVPthink that8215WDTthat explains8216VVZexplain the8217DTthe purpose8218NNpurpose of8219INof 1228220CD@card@ (8221(( e8222LSe )8223)) (8224(( 68225CD6 )8226)) and8227CCand also8228RBalso explains8229VVZexplain why8230WRBwhy it8231PPit should8232MDshould be8233VBbe read8234VVNread according8235VVGaccord to8236TOto its8237PP$its ordinary8238JJordinary plain8239JJplain terms8240NNSterm ,8241,, which8242WDTwhich "8243``" potentially8244RBpotentially responsible8245JJresponsible "8246''" means8247VVZmean ...8248:... "8249``" potentially8250RBpotentially responsible8251JJresponsible "8252''" means8253NNSmean like8254INlike someone8255NNsomeone who8256WPwho could8257MDcould be8258VBbe liable8259JJliable ,8260,, which8261WDTwhich is8262VBZbe that8263IN/thatthat when8264WRBwhen there8265EXthere are8266VBPbe settlement8267NNsettlement negotiations8268NNSnegotiation and8269CCand EPA8270NPEPA has8271VHZhave notified8272VVNnotify all8273PDTall the8274DTthe PRPs8275NNSPRPs of8276INof the8277DTthe settlement8278NNsettlement negotiations8279NNSnegotiation and8280CCand included8281VVDinclude them8282PPthem ...8283:... something8284NNsomething they8285PPthey 've8286VHPhave never8287RBnever done8288VVNdo here8289RBhere ,8290,, we8291PPwe 've8292VHPhave been8293VBNbe excluded8294VVNexclude ...8295:... then8296RBthen they8297PPthey do8298VVPdo n't8299RBn't want8300VVwant these8301DTthese ...8302:... these8303DTthese parties8304NNSparty who8305WPwho face8306VVPface possible8307JJpossible liability8308NNliability and8309CCand ,8310,, therefore8311RBtherefore ,8312,, are8313VBPbe in8314INin settlement8315NNsettlement negotiations8316NNSnegotiation to8317TOto go8318VVgo off8319RPoff and8320CCand do8321VVdo their8322PP$their own8323JJown remedial8324JJremedial plan8325NNplan .8326SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]8327LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But8328CCbut you8329PPyou think8330VVPthink a8331DTa party8332NNparty could8333MDcould be8334VBbe potentially8335RBpotentially responsible8336JJresponsible at8337INat one8338CDone point8339NNpoint but8340CCbut then8341RBthen at8342INat a8343DTa later8344JJRlate point8345NNpoint cease8346VVPcease to8347TOto be8348VBbe potentially8349RBpotentially responsible8350JJresponsible ?8351SENT? [MR. PALMORE]8352LOC[MR. PALMORE] Absolutely8353RBabsolutely ,8354,, Your8355PP$your Honor8356NPHonor ,8357,, I8358PPI do8359VVPdo think8360VVthink that8361DTthat .8362SENT. That's8363NNSThat's ...8364:... [JUSTICE ALITO]8365LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] And8366CCand what8367WPwhat sense8368NNsense ...8369:... [MR. PALMORE]8370LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...8371:... that8372WDTthat 's8373VBZbe inherent8374JJinherent in8375INin the8376DTthe ...8377:... [JUSTICE ALITO]8378LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] ...8379:... would8380MDwould ...8381:... what8382WPwhat sense8383NNsense would8384MDwould that8385RBthat make8386VVmake with8387INwith respect8388NNrespect to8389TOto a8390DTa rule8391NNrule limiting8392VVGlimit the8393DTthe ability8394NNability of8395INof that8396DTthat party8397NNparty to8398TOto engage8399VVengage in8400INin remediation8401NNremediation ?8402SENT? It8403PPit 's8404VBZbe not8405RBnot consistent8406JJconsistent with8407INwith the8408DTthe EPA8409NPEPA plan8410NNplan .8411SENT. [MR. PALMORE]8412LOC[MR. PALMORE] Because8413INbecause ,8414,, Your8415PP$your Honor8416NPHonor ,8417,, first8418JJfirst of8419INof all8420DTall ,8421,, that8422WDTthat 's8423VBZbe the8424DTthe way8425NNway statute8426NNstatute of8427INof limitations8428NNSlimitation work8429VVPwork .8430SENT. Right8431RBright ?8432SENT? Parties8433NNSparty get8434VVPget repose8435VVrepose when8436WRBwhen the8437DTthe statute8438NNstatute has8439VHZhave passed8440VVNpass .8441SENT. And8442CCand I8443PPI think8444VVPthink you8445PPyou have8446VHPhave to8447TOto understand8448VVunderstand the8449DTthe implications8450NNSimplication of8451INof the8452DTthe contrary8453JJcontrary position8454NNposition ,8455,, which8456WDTwhich is8457VBZbe ...8458:... you8459PPyou asked8460VVDask ...8461:... someone8462NNsomeone asked8463VVDask the8464DTthe question8465NNquestion ,8466,, when8467WRBwhen will8468MDwill this8469DTthis plan8470NNplan be8471VBbe over8472RPover ?8473SENT? It8474PPit 's8475VBZbe already8476RBalready over8477RBover on8478INon our8479PP$our land8480NNland .8481SENT. The8482DTthe plan8483NNplan overall8484RBoverall is8485VBZbe targeted8486VVNtarget to8487TOto be8488VBbe completed8489VVNcomplete in8490INin 20258491CD@card@ .8492SENT. But8493CCbut it8494PPit 's8495VBZbe never8496RBnever over8497RBover because8498INbecause all8499DTall of8500INof the8501DTthe arsenic8502NNarsenic and8503CCand other8504JJother contaminants8505NNScontaminant will8506MDwill not8507RBnot be8508VBbe removed8509VVNremove .8510SENT. There8511EXthere is8512VBZbe a8513DTa five-year8514JJfive-year review8515NNreview process8516NNprocess where8517WRBwhere more8518JJRmore remedial8519JJremedial action8520NNaction could8521MDcould be8522VBbe taken8523VVNtake .8524SENT. ARCO8525NPARCO could8526MDcould be8527VBbe required8528VVNrequire to8529TOto do8530VVdo it8531PPit .8532SENT. And8533CCand that8534WDTthat will8535MDwill go8536VVgo on8537INon literally8538RBliterally forever8539RBforever .8540SENT. So8541INso the8542DTthe argument8543NNargument on8544INon the8545DTthe other8546JJother side8547NNside is8548VBZbe that8549IN/thatthat EPA8550NPEPA has8551VHZhave a8552DTa permanent8553JJpermanent easement8554NNeasement on8555INon my8556PP$my client8557NNclient 's8558POS's property8559NNproperty requiring8560VVGrequire them8561PPthem to8562TOto store8563VVstore ARCO8564NPARCO 's8565POS's arsenic8566NNarsenic and8567CCand lead8568VVlead forever8569RBforever unless8570INunless we8571PPwe get8572VVPget EPA8573NPEPA permission8574NNpermission to8575TOto remove8576VVremove it8577PPit .8578SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8579LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Can8580MDcan I8581PPI go8582VVgo back8583RBback to8584TOto Justice8585NPJustice Kagan8586NPKagan 's8587POS's question8588NNquestion for8589INfor a8590DTa second8591NNsecond ?8592SENT? If8593INif EPA8594NPEPA notified8595VVDnotify landowners8596NNSlandowner early8597RBearly on8598INon that8599IN/thatthat they8600PPthey were8601VBDbe all8602DTall PRPs8603NNSPRPs ,8604,, and8605CCand you8606PPyou disagreed8607VVDdisagree ,8608,, how8609WRBhow would8610MDwould that8611RBthat be8612VBbe resolved8613VVNresolve ?8614SENT? [MR. PALMORE]8615LOC[MR. PALMORE] Well8616UHwell ,8617,, I8618PPI think8619VVPthink we8620PPwe ...8621:... we8622PPwe would8623MDwould then8624RBthen ...8625:... I8626PPI think8627VVPthink it8628PPit kind8629NNkind of8630INof depends8631VVZdepend on8632INon how8633WRBhow it8634PPit comes8635VVZcome up8636RPup here8637RBhere .8638SENT. This8639DTthis PRP8640NPPRP issue8641NNissue is8642VBZbe coming8643VVGcome up8644RPup in8645INin an8646DTan odd8647JJodd posture8648NNposture in8649INin this8650DTthis case8651NNcase because8652INbecause I8653PPI think8654VVPthink it8655PPit 's8656VBZbe critical8657JJcritical to8658TOto point8659VVpoint out8660RPout that8661IN/thatthat what8662WPwhat we8663PPwe 're8664VBPbe talking8665VVGtalk about8666RBabout here8667RBhere is8668VBZbe ,8669,, one8670CDone ,8671,, a8672DTa measure8673NNmeasure of8674INof damages8675NNSdamage .8676SENT. Right8677RBright ?8678SENT? These8679DTthese are8680VBPbe trespass8681NNtrespass and8682CCand nuisance8683JJnuisance claims8684NNSclaim .8685SENT. And8686CCand under8687INunder Montana8688NPMontana law8689NNlaw ,8690,, we8691PPwe have8692VHPhave ...8693:... the8694DTthe default8695NNdefault is8696VBZbe diminution8697NNdiminution of8698INof value8699NNvalue .8700SENT. But8701CCbut ,8702,, if8703INif we8704PPwe can8705MDcan establish8706VVestablish that8707IN/thatthat we8708PPwe have8709VHPhave personal8710JJpersonal reasons8711NNSreason for8712INfor wanting8713VVGwant to8714TOto stay8715VVstay on8716INon our8717PP$our property8718NNproperty and8719CCand ...8720:... and8721CCand remove8722VVremove the8723DTthe arsenic8724NNarsenic ,8725,, then8726RBthen we8727PPwe can8728MDcan get8729VVget this8730DTthis other8731JJother measure8732NNmeasure of8733INof damages8734NNSdamage ,8735,, restoration8736NNrestoration damages8737NNSdamage .8738SENT. And8739CCand then8740RBthen it8741PPit comes8742VVZcome in8743INin ,8744,, ARCO8745NPARCO has8746VHZhave argued8747VVNargue that8748IN/thatthat as8749RBas like8750INlike a8751DTa defense8752NNdefense to8753TOto ...8754:... to8755TOto that8756DTthat .8757SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8758LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I8759PPI think8760VVPthink her8761PP$her question8762NNquestion went8763VVDgo to8764TOto it8765PPit would8766MDwould be8767VBbe odd8768JJodd to8769TOto think8770VVthink that8771IN/thatthat the8772DTthe statute8773NNstatute creates8774VVZcreate uncertainty8775NNuncertainty about8776INabout who8777WPwho is8778VBZbe subject8779NNsubject ...8780:... who8781WPwho is8782VBZbe a8783DTa PRP8784NPPRP and8785CCand who8786WPwho is8787VBZbe n't8788RBn't ,8789,, given8790VVNgive who8791WPwho needs8792VVZneed to8793TOto get8794VVget approval8795NNapproval from8796INfrom EPA8797NPEPA to8798TOto do8799VVdo improvements8800NNSimprovement on8801INon the8802DTthe land8803NNland .8804SENT. You8805PPyou would8806MDwould want8807VVwant certainty8808NNcertainty at8809INat the8810DTthe front8811JJfront end8812NNend .8813SENT. And8814CCand if8815INif you8816PPyou can8817MDcan disagree8818VVdisagree and8819CCand she8820PPshe said8821VVDsay go8822VVgo to8823TOto court8824NNcourt ,8825,, that8826WDTthat seems8827VVZseem unusual8828JJunusual for8829INfor this8830DTthis statutory8831JJstatutory structure8832NNstructure .8833SENT. Do8834VVPdo you8835PPyou want8836VVPwant to8837TOto respond8838VVrespond to8839TOto that8840DTthat ?8841SENT? [MR. PALMORE]8842LOC[MR. PALMORE] Well8843UHWell ,8844,, Your8845PP$your Honor8846NPHonor ,8847,, of8848INof course8849NNcourse ,8850,, EPA8851NPEPA has8852VHZhave the8853DTthe ability8854NNability to8855TOto provide8856VVprovide some8857DTsome measure8858NNmeasure of8859INof certainty8860NNcertainty .8861SENT. At8862INat least8863JJSleast it8864PPit can8865MDcan put8866VVput people8867NNSpeople on8868INon notice8869NNnotice that8870IN/thatthat it8871PPit believes8872VVZbelieve they8873PPthey are8874VBPbe PRPs8875NNSPRPs .8876SENT. It8877PPit 's8878VBZbe actually8879RBactually obligated8880VVNobligate to8881TOto do8882VVdo that8883IN/thatthat under8884INunder the8885DTthe statute8886NNstatute .8887SENT. And8888CCand it8889PPit did8890VVDdo n't8891RBn't do8892VVdo that8893IN/thatthat here8894RBhere .8895SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8896LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Right8897RBright .8898SENT. But8899CCbut even8900RBeven if8901INif they8902PPthey do8903VVPdo ,8904,, there8905EXthere 's8906VBZbe disagreement8907NNdisagreement ,8908,, that8909WDTthat would8910MDwould have8911VHhave to8912TOto be8913VBbe resolved8914VVNresolve somehow8915RBsomehow with8916INwith satellite8917JJsatellite collateral8918NNcollateral litigation8919NNlitigation ,8920,, I8921PPI think8922VVPthink ,8923,, or8924CCor else8925RBelse we8926PPwe 'd8927MDwould be8928VBbe back8929RBback in8930INin the8931DTthe same8932JJsame spot8933NNspot decades8934NNSdecade later8935RBRlater .8936SENT. [MR. PALMORE]8937LOC[MR. PALMORE] Perhaps8938RBperhaps ,8939,, Your8940PP$your Honor8941NPHonor .8942SENT. But8943CCbut I8944PPI think8945VVPthink that8946IN/thatthat the8947DTthe assumption8948NNassumption behind8949INbehind those8950DTthose kinds8951NNSkind of8952INof questions8953NNSquestion is8954VBZbe that8955IN/thatthat EPA8956NPEPA critically8957RBcritically needs8958VVZneed 1228959CD@card@ (8960(( e8961LSe )8962)) (8963(( 68964CD6 )8965)) in8966INin order8967NNorder to8968TOto effectuate8969VVeffectuate its8970PP$its goals8971NNSgoal ...8972:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]8973LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Would8974MDwould ...8975:... would8976MDwould you8977PPyou ...8978:... [MR. PALMORE]8979LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...8980:... on8981INon a8982DTa CERCLA8983NPCERCLA run8984NNrun ...8985:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]8986LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...8987:... think8988VVPthink it8989PPit would8990MDwould be8991VBbe a8992DTa ...8993:... [MR. PALMORE]8994LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...8995:... site8996NNsite ,8997,, and8998CCand that8999DTthat 's9000VBZbe not9001RBnot correct9002JJcorrect .9003SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]9004LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...9005:... would9006MDwould you9007PPyou think9008VVPthink it9009PPit would9010MDwould be9011VBbe an9012DTan appropriate9013JJappropriate rule9014NNrule if9015INif basically9016RBbasically it9017PPit were9018VBDbe up9019RPup to9020TOto EPA9021NPEPA to9022TOto designate9023VVdesignate potentially9024RBpotentially responsible9025JJresponsible parties9026NNSparty or9027CCor at9028INat least9029JJSleast that9030IN/thatthat there9031EXthere were9032VBDbe a9033DTa strong9034JJstrong presumption9035NNpresumption that9036IN/thatthat ,9037,, if9038INif EPA9039NPEPA designated9040VVNdesignate somebody9041NNsomebody as9042INas a9043DTa potentially9044RBpotentially responsible9045JJresponsible party9046NNparty ,9047,, they9048PPthey were9049VBDbe one9050CDone ?9051SENT? [MR. PALMORE]9052LOC[MR. PALMORE] I9053PPI ...9054:... I9055PPI ...9056:... I9057PPI do9058VVPdo n't9059RBn't ...9060:... they9061PPthey certainly9062RBcertainly do9063VVPdo n't9064RBn't have9065VHhave the9066DTthe ...9067:... the9068DTthe power9069NNpower to9070TOto do9071VVdo it9072PPit unquestionably9073RBunquestionably ,9074,, because9075INbecause it9076PPit 's9077VBZbe ...9078:... it9079PPit 's9080VBZbe a9081DTa defined9082VVNdefine term9083NNterm under9084INunder the9085DTthe statute9086NNstatute .9087SENT. So9088RBso they9089PPthey did9090VVDdo send9091VVsend us9092PPus such9093JJsuch a9094DTa letter9095NNletter as9096INas a9097DTa litigation9098NNlitigation filing9099NNfiling ,9100,, as9101INas a9102DTa letter9103NNletter to9104TOto counsel9105NNcounsel ,9106,, right9107RBright before9108INbefore the9109DTthe cert9110NNcert petition9111NNpetition in9112INin this9113DTthis case9114NNcase was9115VBDbe filed9116VVNfile .9117SENT. And9118CCand so9119RBso I9120PPI do9121VVPdo n't9122RBn't think9123VVthink that9124DTthat ...9125:... that9126WDTthat 's9127VBZbe not9128RBnot binding9129VVGbind because9130INbecause they9131PPthey 're9132VBPbe wrong9133JJwrong .9134SENT. We9135PPwe 're9136VBPbe not9137RBnot potentially9138RBpotentially responsible9139JJresponsible parties9140NNSparty .9141SENT. And9142CCand it9143PPit also9144RBalso came9145VVDcome decades9146NNSdecade after9147INafter they9148PPthey were9149VBDbe supposed9150VVNsuppose to9151TOto do9152VVdo that9153DTthat .9154SENT. And9155CCand they9156PPthey 've9157VHPhave never9158RBnever treated9159VVNtreat us9160PPus as9161INas potentially9162RBpotentially responsible9163JJresponsible parties9164NNSparty .9165SENT. But9166CCbut at9167INat least9168JJSleast that9169DTthat would9170MDwould define9171VVdefine a9172DTa universe9173NNuniverse ,9174,, if9175INif done9176VVNdo properly9177RBproperly ,9178,, according9179VVGaccord to9180TOto the9181DTthe statute9182NNstatute ...9183:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]9184LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Yeah9185NPYeah ,9186,, I9187PPI ...9188:... [MR. PALMORE]9189LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...9190:... of9191INof people9192NNSpeople ...9193:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]9194LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...9195:... actually9196RBactually ...9197:... you9198PPyou 're9199VBPbe quite9200RBquite right9201JJright .9202SENT. I9203PPI was9204VBDbe not9205RBnot clear9206JJclear enough9207RBenough in9208INin my9209PP$my question9210NNquestion .9211SENT. I9212PPI actually9213RBactually meant9214VVDmean as9215RBas ...9216:... that9217IN/thatthat they9218PPthey would9219MDwould designate9220VVdesignate somebody9221NNsomebody as9222INas part9223NNpart of9224INof putting9225VVGput together9226RBtogether the9227DTthe settlement9228NNsettlement negotiations9229NNSnegotiation that9230IN/thatthat 1369231CD@card@ is9232VBZbe all9233RBall about9234RBabout .9235SENT. [MR. PALMORE]9236LOC[MR. PALMORE] Absolutely9237RBabsolutely .9238SENT. That9239DTthat would9240MDwould at9241INat least9242JJSleast allow9243VVallow them9244PPthem to9245TOto identify9246VVidentify the9247DTthe universe9248NNuniverse and9249CCand put9250VVput people9251NNSpeople on9252INon notice9253NNnotice that9254IN/thatthat EPA9255NPEPA ...9256:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9257LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] The9258DTthe problem9259NNproblem ,9260,, knowing9261VVGknow your9262PP$your land9263NNland ...9264:... your9265PP$your clients9266NNSclient are9267VBPbe landowners9268NNSlandowner of9269INof land9270NNland that9271WDTthat is9272VBZbe polluted9273JJpolluted ,9274,, and9275CCand it9276PPit 's9277VBZbe a9278DTa Superfund9279NPSuperfund site9280NNsite .9281SENT. Now9282RBnow they9283PPthey know9284VVPknow that9285RBthat .9286SENT. [MR. PALMORE]9287LOC[MR. PALMORE] Yes9288NPYes .9289SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9290LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] You9291PPyou 're9292VBPbe a9293DTa good9294JJgood lawyer9295NNlawyer .9296SENT. I9297PPI would9298MDwould n't9299RBn't think9300VVthink there9301EXthere was9302VBDbe actually9303RBactually a9304DTa problem9305NNproblem of9306INof their9307PP$their being9308VBGbe ignorant9309JJignorant .9310SENT. Maybe9311RBmaybe there9312EXthere is9313VBZbe .9314SENT. I9315PPI do9316VVPdo n't9317RBn't know9318VVknow what9319WPwhat it9320PPit is9321VBZbe .9322SENT. I9323PPI have9324VHPhave n't9325RBn't seen9326VVNsee it9327PPit .9328SENT. So9329RBso does9330VVZdo it9331PPit boil9332VVboil down9333RPdown to9334TOto ...9335:... and9336CCand you9337PPyou said9338VVDsay this9339DTthis ,9340,, but9341CCbut I9342PPI do9343VVPdo n't9344RBn't think9345VVthink you9346PPyou 're9347VBPbe right9348RBright ...9349:... that9350DTthat ...9351:... that9352IN/thatthat ,9353,, on9354INon the9355DTthe one9356CDone hand9357NNhand ,9358,, you9359PPyou said9360VVDsay EPA9361NPEPA gets9362VVZget some9363DTsome kind9364NNkind of9365INof permanent9366JJpermanent easement9367NNeasement on9368INon their9369PP$their property9370NNproperty to9371TOto tell9372VVtell them9373PPthem what9374WPwhat to9375TOto do9376VVdo .9377SENT. But9378CCbut is9379VBZbe n't9380RBn't that9381IN/thatthat an9382DTan overstatement9383NNoverstatement ?9384SENT? What9385WPWhat EPA9386NPEPA can9387MDcan do9388VVdo is9389VBZbe they9390PPthey can9391MDcan say9392VVsay we9393PPwe do9394VVPdo n't9395RBn't want9396VVwant you9397PPyou physically9398RBphysically to9399TOto change9400VVchange this9401DTthis land9402NNland .9403SENT. And9404CCand if9405INif you9406PPyou think9407VVPthink that9408IN/thatthat they9409PPthey are9410VBPbe unreasonable9411JJunreasonable ,9412,, you9413PPyou go9414VVPgo to9415TOto court9416VVcourt .9417SENT. That9418DTthat 's9419VBZbe their9420PP$their side9421NNside of9422INof it9423PPit .9424SENT. And9425CCand you9426PPyou say9427VVPsay they9428PPthey 're9429VBPbe unreasonable9430JJunreasonable .9431SENT. Okay9432JJokay ?9433SENT? That9434DTthat 's9435VBZbe simple9436JJsimple .9437SENT. And9438CCand most9439JJSmost people9440NNSpeople can9441MDcan do9442VVdo that9443DTthat .9444SENT. And9445CCand if9446INif you9447PPyou win9448VVPwin ,9449,, then9450RBthen it9451PPit 's9452VBZbe really9453RBreally about9454INabout the9455DTthe same9456JJsame thing9457NNthing .9458SENT. You9459PPyou can9460MDcan go9461VVgo and9462CCand say9463VVsay ,9464,, look9465VVlook ,9466,, we9467PPwe under9468INunder our9469PP$our Montana9470NPMontana statute9471NNstatute believe9472VVPbelieve that9473IN/thatthat we9474PPwe should9475MDshould not9476RBnot just9477RBjust get9478VVget money9479NNmoney ,9480,, but9481CCbut we9482PPwe should9483MDshould get9484VVget money9485NNmoney that9486WDTthat is9487VBZbe earmarked9488VVNearmark and9489CCand must9490MDmust be9491VBbe used9492VVNuse to9493TOto make9494VVmake physical9495JJphysical changes9496NNSchange in9497INin the9498DTthe property9499NNproperty .9500SENT. That9501DTthat 's9502VBZbe the9503DTthe problem9504NNproblem .9505SENT. And9506CCand if9507INif you9508PPyou can9509MDcan do9510VVdo that9511IN/thatthat ,9512,, it9513PPit may9514MDmay be9515VBbe easier9516JJReasy to9517TOto get9518VVget .9519SENT. But9520CCbut the9521DTthe problem9522NNproblem is9523VBZbe that9524IN/thatthat there9525EXthere could9526MDcould be9527VBbe many9528JJmany states9529NNSstate that9530WDTthat have9531VHPhave that9532DTthat ,9533,, and9534CCand you9535PPyou can9536MDcan 't9537RB't run9538VVrun it9539PPit in9540INin a9541DTa central9542JJcentral way9543NNway .9544SENT. Have9545VHPhave I9546PPI stated9547VVNstate correctly9548RBcorrectly what9549WPwhat the9550DTthe issue9551NNissue is9552VBZbe ?9553SENT? [MR. PALMORE]9554LOC[MR. PALMORE] Perhaps9555RBperhaps ,9556,, Your9557PP$your Honor9558NPHonor .9559SENT. First9560JJfirst of9561INof all9562DTall ,9563,, a9564DTa couple9565NNcouple answers9566NNSanswer .9567SENT. One9568PPone is9569VBZbe Congress9570NPCongress wanted9571VVDwant to9572TOto allow9573VVallow state9574NNstate law9575NNlaw to9576TOto ...9577:... to9578TOto proceed9579VVproceed ...9580:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9581LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] They9582PPthey did9583VVDdo for9584INfor damages9585NNSdamage .9586SENT. There9587EXthere is9588VBZbe no9589DTno doubt9590NNdoubt .9591SENT. [MR. PALMORE]9592LOC[MR. PALMORE] And9593CCand for9594INfor what9595WPwhat ...9596:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9597LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But9598CCbut is9599VBZbe there9600RBthere ...9601:... [MR. PALMORE]9602LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...9603:... and9604CCand ...9605:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9606LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...9607:... any9608DTany indication9609NNindication they9610PPthey wanted9611VVDwant physical9612JJphysical changes9613NNSchange to9614TOto be9615VBbe made9616VVNmake by9617INby 409618CD@card@ different9619JJdifferent entities9620NNSentity ?9621SENT? [MR. PALMORE]9622LOC[MR. PALMORE] Yes9623NPYes ,9624,, Your9625PP$your Honor9626NPHonor .9627SENT. If9628INif you9629PPyou look9630VVPlook at9631INat Section9632NPSection 1149633CD@card@ (9634(( b9635LSb )9636)) ,9637,, which9638WDTwhich is9639VBZbe a9640DTa no9641RBno double9642JJdouble recovery9643NNrecovery provision9644NNprovision ,9645,, Congress9646NPCongress contemplated9647VVDcontemplate that9648IN/thatthat there9649EXthere would9650MDwould be9651VBbe state9652NNstate law9653NNlaw recovery9654NNrecovery for9655INfor removal9656NNremoval ,9657,, and9658CCand the9659DTthe only9660JJonly limit9661NNlimit it9662PPit put9663VVPput on9664INon it9665PPit was9666VBDbe that9667IN/thatthat there9668EXthere be9669VBbe no9670DTno double9671JJdouble recovery9672NNrecovery .9673SENT. Congress9674NPCongress knew9675VVDknow that9676IN/thatthat there9677EXthere could9678MDcould be9679VBbe state9680NNstate law9681NNlaw ...9682:... state9683NNstate law9684NNlaw recovery9685NNrecovery for9686INfor removal9687NNremoval and9688CCand it9689PPit allowed9690VVDallow it9691PPit to9692TOto continue9693VVcontinue .9694SENT. And9695CCand also9696RBalso I9697PPI think9698VVPthink that9699IN/thatthat the9700DTthe ...9701:... the9702DTthe ...9703:... the9704DTthe ...9705:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9706LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But9707CCbut what9708WPwhat ,9709,, Mr9710NPMr .9711SENT. Palmore9712NPPalmore ,9713,, of9714INof the9715DTthe argument9716NNargument that9717IN/thatthat what9718WPwhat the9719DTthe state9720NNstate court9721NNcourt might9722MDmight order9723VVorder conflicts9724NNSconflict with9725INwith what9726WPwhat EEOC9727NPEEOC ...9728:... that9729IN/thatthat what9730WPwhat the9731DTthe EPA9732NPEPA ,9733,, for9734INfor ...9735:... one9736CDone example9737NNexample was9738VBDbe given9739VVNgive here9740RBhere .9741SENT. You9742PPyou want9743VVPwant more9744JJRmore arsenic9745NNarsenic removed9746VVDremove .9747SENT. EPA9748NPEPA said9749VVDsay that9750IN/thatthat that9751WDTthat would9752MDwould involve9753VVinvolve danger9754NNdanger .9755SENT. There9756EXthere would9757MDwould be9758VBbe additional9759JJadditional hazards9760NNShazard .9761SENT. The9762DTthe ...9763:... the9764DTthe problem9765NNproblem with9766INwith not9767RBnot having9768VHGhave EPA9769NPEPA as9770INas the9771DTthe overall9772JJoverall supervisor9773NNsupervisor means9774VVZmean that9775IN/thatthat there9776RBthere ...9777:... that9778IN/thatthat there9779EXthere can9780MDcan be9781VBbe clashes9782NNSclash between9783INbetween what9784WPwhat state9785NNstate law9786NNlaw says9787VVZsay is9788VBZbe okay9789JJokay and9790CCand what9791WPwhat EPA9792NPEPA says9793VVZsay should9794MDshould be9795VBbe the9796DTthe proper9797JJproper treatment9798NNtreatment .9799SENT. So9800RBso ...9801:... [MR. PALMORE]9802LOC[MR. PALMORE] Justice9803NPJustice Ginsburg9804NPGinsburg ,9805,, of9806INof course9807NNcourse ,9808,, if9809INif EPA9810NPEPA thinks9811VVZthink that9812IN/thatthat a9813DTa remedy9814NNremedy is9815VBZbe going9816VVGgo to9817TOto cause9818VVcause harm9819NNharm ,9820,, as9821INas it9822PPit said9823VVDsay in9824INin its9825PP$its invitation9826NNinvitation ,9827,, we9828PPwe believe9829VVPbelieve it9830PPit has9831VHZhave ample9832JJample tools9833NNStool to9834TOto stop9835VVstop it9836PPit .9837SENT. Second9838JJsecond of9839INof all9840DTall ,9841,, there9842EXthere is9843VBZbe simply9844RBsimply in9845INin this9846DTthis case9847NNcase ...9848:... that9849WDTthat might9850MDmight be9851VBbe an9852DTan issue9853NNissue in9854INin another9855DTanother case9856NNcase .9857SENT. In9858INin this9859DTthis case9860NNcase ,9861,, there9862EXthere is9863VBZbe no9864DTno such9865JJsuch finding9866NNfinding in9867INin any9868DTany of9869INof the9870DTthe regulatory9871JJregulatory documents9872NNSdocument of9873INof ...9874:... of9875INof environmental9876JJenvironmental harm9877NNharm .9878SENT. They9879PPthey just9880RBjust said9881VVDsay we9882PPwe 're9883VBPbe going9884VVGgo to9885TOto go9886VVgo this9887DTthis far9888RBfar and9889CCand no9890RBno further9891RBRfurther .9892SENT. They9893PPthey did9894VVDdo n't9895RBn't reject9896VVreject any9897DTany ...9898:... they9899PPthey did9900VVDdo n't9901RBn't reject9902VVreject our9903PP$our permeable9904JJpermeable wall9905NNwall to9906TOto clean9907VVclean the9908DTthe groundwater9909NNgroundwater .9910SENT. They9911PPthey did9912VVDdo n't9913RBn't say9914VVsay we9915PPwe can9916MDcan 't9917RB't do9918VVPdo 249919CD@card@ inches9920NNSinch ,9921,, much9922RBmuch less9923RBRless did9924VVDdo they9925PPthey say9926VVPsay that9927IN/thatthat any9928DTany of9929INof those9930DTthose things9931NNSthing would9932MDwould cause9933VVcause environmental9934JJenvironmental harm9935NNharm .9936SENT. So9937RBso in9938INin a9939DTa ...9940:... in9941INin ...9942:... one9943PPone can9944MDcan imagine9945VVimagine ...9946:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]9947LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Maybe9948RBmaybe it9949PPit was9950VBDbe a9951DTa moot9952JJmoot question9953NNquestion if9954INif it9955PPit 's9956VBZbe your9957PP$your obligation9958NNobligation to9959TOto ask9960VVask them9961PPthem ,9962,, meaning9963VVGmean ,9964,, if9965INif you9966PPyou are9967VBPbe a9968DTa PRP9969NPPRP and9970CCand that9971DTthat 's9972VBZbe what9973WPwhat we9974PPwe conclude9975VVPconclude ,9976,, it9977PPit would9978MDwould be9979VBbe your9980PP$your obligation9981NNobligation to9982TOto ask9983VVask them9984PPthem for9985INfor permission9986NNpermission .9987SENT. So9988RBso ,9989,, if9990INif Ms9991NNMs .9992SENT. Blatt9993NPBlatt is9994VBZbe right9995JJright that9996IN/thatthat the9997DTthe award9998NNaward here9999RBhere ,10000,, assuming10001VVGassume you10002PPyou were10003VBDbe to10004TOto get10005VVget one10006CDone ,10007,, were10008VBDbe conditioned10009VVNcondition on10010INon you10011PPyou being10012VBGbe a10013DTa PRP10014NPPRP and10015CCand any10016DTany action10017NNaction you10018PPyou took10019VVDtake had10020VHDhave to10021TOto be10022VBbe approved10023VVNapprove by10024INby the10025DTthe EPA10026NPEPA ,10027,, what10028WPwhat damage10029NNdamage does10030VVZdo this10031DTthis do10032VVPdo to10033TOto you10034PPyou ?10035SENT? [MR. PALMORE]10036LOC[MR. PALMORE] That10037DTthat would10038MDwould be10039VBbe a10040DTa question10041NNquestion ...10042:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10043LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] You10044PPyou ...10045:... you10046PPyou would10047MDwould have10048VHhave administrative10049JJadministrative remedies10050NNSremedy to10051TOto challenge10052VVchallenge their10053PP$their denial10054NNdenial of10055INof any10056DTany activity10057NNactivity you10058PPyou wanted10059VVDwant to10060TOto take10061VVtake .10062SENT. That10063DTthat would10064MDwould be10065VBbe litigated10066VVNlitigate by10067INby a10068DTa court10069NNcourt .10070SENT. But10071CCbut at10072INat least10073JJSleast there10074EXthere would10075MDwould be10076VBbe clarity10077NNclarity .10078SENT. Landowners10079NNSlandowner on10080INon super10081JJsuper site10082NNsite funds10083NNSfund ,10084,, before10085INbefore you10086PPyou interfere10087VVPinterfere with10088INwith the10089DTthe EPA10090NPEPA ,10091,, get10092VVPget their10093PP$their approval10094NNapproval or10095CCor before10096RBbefore you10097PPyou attempt10098VVattempt to10099TOto or10100CCor before10101INbefore you10102PPyou attempt10103VVPattempt to10104TOto do10105VVdo anything10106NNanything ,10107,, get10108VVget their10109PP$their approval10110NNapproval .10111SENT. What10112WPWhat 's10113VBZbe wrong10114JJwrong with10115INwith such10116PDTsuch a10117DTa ruling10118NNruling ?10119SENT? [MR. PALMORE]10120LOC[MR. PALMORE] Well10121UHWell ,10122,, Your10123PP$your Honor10124NPHonor ,10125,, of10126INof course10127NNcourse ,10128,, our10129PP$our position10130NNposition is10131VBZbe we10132PPwe 're10133VBPbe not10134RBnot required10135VVNrequire to10136TOto get10137VVget approval10138NNapproval because10139INbecause we10140PPwe 're10141VBPbe not10142RBnot PRPs10143NNSPRPs .10144SENT. If10145INif we10146PPwe lose10147VVPlose on10148INon that10149DTthat and10150CCand if10151INif you10152PPyou conclude10153VVPconclude we10154PPwe ...10155:... we10156PPwe also10157RBalso are10158VBPbe not10159RBnot contiguous10160JJcontiguous landowners10161NNSlandowner ,10162,, which10163WDTwhich carves10164VVZcarve us10165PPus out10166RPout ...10167:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10168LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I10169PPI do10170VVPdo n't10171RBn't have10172VHhave to10173TOto decide10174VVdecide that10175DTthat .10176SENT. [MR. PALMORE]10177LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...10178:... of10179INof the10180DTthe definition10181NNdefinition of10182INof owner10183NNowner ...10184:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10185LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That10186DTthat ...10187:... the10188DTthe Court10189NPCourt ...10190:... [MR. PALMORE]10191LOC[MR. PALMORE] Well10192UHWell ,10193,, their10194PP$their argument10195NNargument is10196VBZbe all10197DTall owners10198NNSowner are10199VBPbe PRPs10200NPPRPs .10201SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10202LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Whether10203NPWhether ...10204:... [MR. PALMORE]10205LOC[MR. PALMORE] If10206INif we10207PPwe 're10208VBPbe not10209RBnot owners10210NNSowner ...10211:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10212LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...10213:... whether10214INwhether ...10215:... [MR. PALMORE]10216LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...10217:... we10218PPwe 're10219VBPbe not10220RBnot a10221DTa PRP10222NPPRP .10223SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10224LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...10225:... just10226RBjust assume10227VVassume ...10228:... [MR. PALMORE]10229LOC[MR. PALMORE] If10230INif you10231PPyou ...10232:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10233LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...10234:... that10235IN/thatthat we10236PPwe rule10237VVPrule that10238IN/thatthat you10239PPyou 're10240VBPbe ...10241:... [MR. PALMORE]10242LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...10243:... assume10244VVassume away10245RPaway all10246DTall of10247INof that10248WDTthat ,10249,, then10250RBthen it10251PPit 's10252VBZbe really10253RBreally a10254DTa state10255NNstate law10256NNlaw question10257NNquestion .10258SENT. This10259DTthis is10260VBZbe a10261DTa state10262NNstate law10263NNlaw question10264NNquestion .10265SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10266LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] No10267NPNo ,10268,, it10269PPit 's10270VBZbe not10271RBnot a10272DTa state10273NNstate law10274NNlaw question10275NNquestion .10276SENT. [MR. PALMORE]10277LOC[MR. PALMORE] It10278PPit ...10279:... it10280PPit ...10281:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10282LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] We10283PPwe would10284MDwould hold10285VVhold that10286IN/thatthat it10287PPit would10288MDwould ...10289:... it10290PPit would10291MDwould conflict10292VVconflict with10293INwith federal10294JJfederal law10295NNlaw ,10296,, with10297INwith federal10298JJfederal rules10299NNSrule ,10300,, if10301INif you10302PPyou go10303VVPgo ahead10304RBahead with10305INwith that10306DTthat ...10307:... with10308INwith remediation10309NNremediation without10310INwithout EPA10311NPEPA approval10312NNapproval .10313SENT. You10314PPyou are10315VBPbe a10316DTa PRP10317NPPRP .10318SENT. And10319CCand conflict10320NNconflict preemption10321NNpreemption stops10322VVZstop you10323PPyou from10324INfrom taking10325VVGtake any10326DTany actions10327NNSaction that10328WDTthat are10329VBPbe not10330RBnot approved10331VVNapprove by10332INby the10333DTthe EPA10334NPEPA ,10335,, period10336NNperiod ,10337,, end10338NNend of10339INof case10340NNcase .10341SENT. [MR. PALMORE]10342LOC[MR. PALMORE] The10343DTthe reason10344NNreason that10345WDTthat would10346MDwould be10347VBbe a10348DTa remand10349NNremand question10350NNquestion ,10351,, Justice10352NPJustice Sotomayor10353NPSotomayor ,10354,, is10355VBZbe because10356INbecause we10357PPwe have10358VHPhave n't10359RBn't asked10360VVNask the10361DTthe EPA10362NPEPA for10363INfor that10364DTthat permission10365NNpermission because10366INbecause we've10367NNwe've ...10368:... we10369PPwe do10370VVPdo n't10371RBn't believe10372VVbelieve we10373PPwe are10374VBPbe PRPs10375NNSPRPs .10376SENT. And10377CCand ,10378,, in10379INin fact10380NNfact ,10381,, EPA10382NPEPA itself10383PPitself took10384VVDtake no10385DTno position10386NNposition on10387INon whether10388INwhether we10389PPwe are10390VBPbe PRPs10391NNSPRPs in10392INin this10393DTthis very10394JJvery case10395NNcase .10396SENT. So10397RBso we10398PPwe might10399MDmight be10400VBbe able10401JJable to10402TOto get10403VVget in10404INin the10405DTthe district10406NNdistrict court10407NNcourt in10408INin Montana10409NPMontana ...10410:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10411LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I10412PPI thought10413VVDthink their10414PP$their whole10415JJwhole brief10416NNbrief said10417VVDsay you10418PPyou were10419VBDbe ...10420:... [MR. PALMORE]10421LOC[MR. PALMORE] In10422INin the10423DTthe district10424NNdistrict court10425NNcourt in10426INin Montana10427NPMontana ,10428,, the10429DTthe U10430NPU .10431SENT. S10432NPS .10433SENT. Government10434NNgovernment said10435VVDsay we10436PPwe take10437VVtake no10438DTno position10439NNposition on10440INon whether10441INwhether landowners10442NNSlandowner here10443RBhere are10444VBPbe PRPs10445NNSPRPs .10446SENT. Their10447PP$their position10448NNposition has10449VHZhave changed10450VVNchange dramatically10451RBdramatically over10452INover time10453NNtime .10454SENT. What10455WPWhat I10456PPI 'm10457VBPbe saying10458VVGsay is10459VBZbe we10460PPwe never10461RBnever had10462VHDhave any10463DTany reason10464NNreason to10465TOto seek10466VVseek their10467PP$their permission10468NNpermission .10469SENT. If10470INif you10471PPyou were10472VBDbe to10473TOto hold10474VVhold that10475IN/thatthat we10476PPwe need10477VVPneed their10478PP$their permission10479NNpermission ,10480,, then10481RBthen we10482PPwe ...10483:... A10484DTa ,10485,, we10486PPwe might10487MDmight get10488VVget it10489PPit ,10490,, they10491PPthey 've10492VHPhave said10493VVNsay before10494RBbefore that10495IN/thatthat there10496EXthere are10497VBPbe aspects10498NNSaspect of10499INof our10500PP$our plan10501NNplan they10502PPthey could10503MDcould approve10504VVapprove ;10505:; and10506CCand ,10507,, B10508NPB ,10509,, to10510TOto the10511DTthe extent10512NNextent that10513IN/thatthat there10514EXthere 's10515VBZbe uncertainty10516NNuncertainty about10517INabout that10518DTthat ,10519,, that10520WDTthat is10521VBZbe a10522DTa state10523NNstate law10524NNlaw question10525NNquestion because10526INbecause ,10527,, again10528RBagain ,10529,, all10530RBall we10531PPwe 're10532VBPbe talking10533VVGtalk about10534RBabout here10535RBhere is10536VBZbe whether10537INwhether ...10538:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10539LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] No10540RBno ,10541,, it10542PPit 's10543VBZbe not10544RBnot a10545DTa state10546NNstate law10547NNlaw question10548NNquestion .10549SENT. [MR. PALMORE]10550LOC[MR. PALMORE] It10551PPit 's10552VBZbe embedded10553VVNembed ...10554:... it10555PPit 's10556VBZbe a10557DTa federal10558JJfederal question10559NNquestion ...10560:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10561LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] We10562PPwe have10563VHPhave said10564VVNsay there10565EXthere 's10566VBZbe a10567DTa conflict10568NNconflict ,10569,, it10570PPit 's10571VBZbe a10572DTa federal10573JJfederal question10574NNquestion ...10575:... [MR. PALMORE]10576LOC[MR. PALMORE] It10577PPit 's10578VBZbe a10579DTa federal10580JJfederal question10581NNquestion embedded10582VVNembed in10583INin a10584DTa state10585NNstate law10586NNlaw question10587NNquestion because10588INbecause the10589DTthe state10590NNstate law10591NNlaw question10592NNquestion is10593VBZbe :10594:: Do10595VVPdo we10596PPwe intend10597VVPintend to10598TOto use10599VVuse this10600DTthis money10601NNmoney to10602TOto clean10603VVclean up10604RPup our10605PP$our land10606NNland ?10607SENT? And10608CCand that10609WDTthat prevents10610VVZprevent windfalls10611NNSwindfall .10612SENT. That10613DTthat 's10614VBZbe the10615DTthe Montana10616NPMontana Supreme10617NPSupreme Court10618NPCourt 's10619POS's decision10620NNdecision in10621INin Sunburst10622NNsunburst .10623SENT. What10624WPWhat they10625PPthey 're10626VBPbe saying10627VVGsay is10628VBZbe ,10629,, well10630UHwell ,10631,, you10632PPyou may10633MDmay not10634RBnot get10635VVget EPA10636NPEPA approval10637NNapproval to10638TOto clean10639VVclean your10640PP$your land10641NNland ,10642,, so10643RBso you10644PPyou would10645MDwould n't10646RBn't actually10647RBactually be10648VBbe able10649JJable to10650TOto do10651VVdo it10652PPit .10653SENT. How10654WRBHow that10655DTthat uncertainty10656NNuncertainty ,10657,, that10658DTthat possibility10659NNpossibility of10660INof need10661NNneed for10662INfor EPA10663NPEPA approval10664NNapproval would10665MDwould be10666VBbe factored10667VVNfactor into10668INinto the10669DTthe damages10670NNSdamage calculation10671NNcalculation is10672VBZbe a10673DTa state10674NNstate law10675NNlaw question10676NNquestion .10677SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10678LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Can10679MDcan ...10680:... [MR. PALMORE]10681LOC[MR. PALMORE] If10682INif I10683PPI could10684MDcould return10685VVreturn to10686TOto Justice10687NPJustice Breyer10688NPBreyer 's10689POS's question10690NNquestion .10691SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10692LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well10693UHWell ,10694,, okay10695JJokay ,10696,, before10697INbefore you10698PPyou do10699VVPdo that10700IN/thatthat ,10701,, I10702PPI just10703RBjust was10704VBDbe hoping10705VVGhope you10706PPyou might10707MDmight return10708VVreturn to10709TOto Justice10710NPJustice Ginsburg10711NPGinsburg 's10712POS's question10713NNquestion .10714SENT. And10715CCand let10716VVlet ...10717:... let10718VVlet 's10719VBZbe suppose10720VVsuppose for10721INfor the10722DTthe purposes10723NNSpurpose of10724INof this10725DTthis hypothetical10726JJhypothetical that10727IN/thatthat you10728PPyou 're10729VBPbe ...10730:... you10731PPyou 're10732VBPbe not10733RBnot a10734DTa PRP10735NPPRP but10736CCbut that10737IN/thatthat EPA10738NPEPA thinks10739VVZthink that10740IN/thatthat some10741DTsome aspects10742NNSaspect of10743INof your10744PP$your plan10745NNplan would10746MDwould interfere10747VVinterfere with10748INwith its10749PP$its interests10750NNSinterest .10751SENT. You10752PPyou said10753VVDsay that10754IN/thatthat the10755DTthe EPA10756NPEPA has10757VHZhave plenty10758NNplenty of10759INof tools10760NNStool available10761JJavailable to10762TOto it10763PPit in10764INin that10765DTthat scenario10766NNscenario to10767TOto address10768VVaddress any10769DTany conflicts10770NNSconflict .10771SENT. Can10772MDcan you10773PPyou be10774VBbe specific10775JJspecific about10776INabout what10777WPwhat EPA10778NPEPA could10779MDcould do10780VVdo to10781TOto take10782VVtake care10783NNcare of10784INof its10785PP$its interests10786NNSinterest in10787INin that10788DTthat scenario10789NNscenario ?10790SENT? [MR. PALMORE]10791LOC[MR. PALMORE] Yes10792NPYes ,10793,, Your10794PP$your Honor10795NPHonor .10796SENT. And10797CCand I10798PPI ...10799:... I10800PPI ...10801:... you10802PPyou do10803VVPdo n't10804RBn't have10805VHhave to10806TOto take10807VVtake my10808PP$my ...10809:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10810LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Because10811INbecause 12210812CD@card@ won10813MDwill 't10814RB't work10815NNwork ,10816,, right10817RBright ?10818SENT? [MR. PALMORE]10819LOC[MR. PALMORE] You10820PPyou do10821VVPdo n't10822RBn't have10823VHhave to10824TOto take10825VVtake my10826PP$my word10827NNword for10828INfor it10829PPit .10830SENT. You10831PPyou can10832MDcan look10833VVlook at10834INat page10835NNpage 1710836CD@card@ of10837INof the10838DTthe government10839NNgovernment 's10840POS's invitation10841NNinvitation brief10842NNbrief in10843INin this10844DTthis case10845NNcase ,10846,, where10847WRBwhere it10848PPit said10849VVDsay you10850PPyou do10851VVPdo n't10852RBn't need10853VVneed to10854TOto take10855VVtake cert10856NNcert on10857INon this10858DTthis PRP10859NPPRP issue10860NNissue because10861INbecause we10862PPwe have10863VHPhave plenty10864NNplenty of10865INof tools10866NNStool in10867INin order10868NNorder to10869TOto safeguard10870VVsafeguard the10871DTthe integrity10872NNintegrity of10873INof our10874PP$our remedial10875JJremedial plan10876NNplan .10877SENT. Those10878DTthose are10879VBPbe under10880INunder Section10881NPSection 10610882CD@card@ .10883SENT. It10884PPit can10885MDcan seek10886VVseek administrative10887JJadministrative orders10888NNSorder .10889SENT. It10890PPit can10891MDcan seek10892VVseek injunctions10893NNSinjunction .10894SENT. There10895EXthere are10896VBPbe plenty10897NNplenty of10898INof tools10899NNStool it10900PPit can10901MDcan ...10902:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10903LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Can10904MDcan it10905PPit do10906VVdo that10907IN/thatthat even10908RBeven with10909INwith respect10910NNrespect to10911TOto somebody10912NNsomebody who10913WPwho 's10914VBZbe not10915RBnot a10916DTa PRP10917NPPRP ?10918SENT? [MR. PALMORE]10919LOC[MR. PALMORE] Absolutely10920RBabsolutely .10921SENT. If10922INif ...10923:... if10924INif someone10925NNsomeone is10926VBZbe going10927VVGgo to10928TOto do10929VVdo something10930NNsomething that10931WDTthat 's10932VBZbe going10933VVGgo to10934TOto release10935VVrelease toxic10936JJtoxic substances10937NNSsubstance into10938INinto the10939DTthe ...10940:... onto10941INonto their10942PP$their neighbors10943NNSneighbor '10944POS' property10945NNproperty or10946CCor into10947INinto a10948DTa creek10949NNcreek or10950CCor something10951NNsomething ,10952,, then10953RBthen they10954PPthey have10955VHPhave plenty10956NNplenty of10957INof tools10958NNStool to10959TOto address10960VVaddress that10961DTthat .10962SENT. They10963PPthey do10964VVPdo n't10965RBn't need10966VVneed this10967DTthis ...10968:... this10969DTthis ongoing10970JJongoing supervision10971NNsupervision .10972SENT. And10973CCand that10974DTthat ties10975NNSty into10976INinto a10977DTa part10978NNpart of10979INof Justice10980NPJustice Breyer10981NPBreyer 's10982POS's question10983NNquestion ,10984,, which10985WDTwhich I10986PPI did10987VVDdo n't10988RBn't ask10989VVask yet10990RByet .10991SENT. I10992PPI think10993VVPthink ...10994:... answer10995VVanswer yet10996RByet ,10997,, which10998WDTwhich is10999VBZbe you11000PPyou were11001VBDbe asking11002VVGask about11003RBabout well11004RBwell ,11005,, could11006MDcould n't11007RBn't they11008PPthey get11009VVPget approval11010NNapproval and11011CCand why11012WRBwhy is11013VBZbe this11014DTthis ...11015:... why11016WRBwhy might11017MDmight this11018RBthis be11019VBbe a11020DTa taking11021NNtaking .11022SENT. It11023PPit depends11024VVZdepend on11025INon what11026WPwhat the11027DTthe default11028NNdefault rule11029NNrule is11030VBZbe ,11031,, right11032RBright ?11033SENT? Where11034WRBwhere does11035VVZdo the11036DTthe property11037NNproperty right11038NNright lie11039NNlie ?11040SENT? Does11041VVZdo it11042PPit lie11043VVPlie with11044INwith ...11045:... lie11046VVlie with11047INwith EPA11048NPEPA ?11049SENT? Or11050CCor does11051VVZdo it11052PPit lie11053VVPlie with11054INwith the11055DTthe landowners11056NNSlandowner ?11057SENT? Under11058INunder Montana11059NPMontana law11060NNlaw ,11061,, we11062PPwe have11063VHPhave a11064DTa right11065NNright ,11066,, a11067DTa wrongdoer11068NNwrongdoer has11069VHZhave put11070VVNput arsenic11071NNarsenic on11072INon our11073PP$our land11074NNland ,11075,, and11076CCand we11077PPwe have11078VHPhave a11079DTa state11080NNstate law11081NNlaw right11082RBright to11083TOto get11084VVget a11085DTa judgment11086NNjudgment sufficient11087JJsufficient to11088TOto remove11089VVremove it11090PPit .11091SENT. It11092PPit 's11093VBZbe not11094RBnot ...11095:... that11096WDTthat 's11097VBZbe not11098RBnot applying11099VVGapply the11100DTthe CERCLA11101NPCERCLA health11102NNhealth standard11103NNstandard .11104SENT. That11105DTthat 's11106VBZbe applying11107VVGapply bread-and-butter11108JJbread-and-butter Montana11109NPMontana property11110NNproperty law11111NNlaw .11112SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11113LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Am11114VBPbe I11115PPI right11116JJright that11117IN/thatthat your11118PP$your answer11119NNanswer to11120TOto Justice11121NPJustice Gorsuch11122NPGorsuch 's11123POS's question11124NNquestion really11125RBreally just11126RBjust turns11127VVZturn on11128INon who11129WPwho has11130VHZhave the11131DTthe burden11132NNburden ?11133SENT? Under11134INunder your11135PP$your theory11136NNtheory ,11137,, EPA11138NPEPA has11139VHZhave the11140DTthe burden11141NNburden to11142TOto initiate11143VVinitiate proceedings11144NNSproceeding ;11145:; under11146INunder the11147DTthe other11148JJother side11149NNside 's11150POS's argument11151NNargument ,11152,, the11153DTthe landowner11154NNlandowner has11155VHZhave the11156DTthe burden11157NNburden to11158TOto go11159VVgo to11160TOto EPA11161NPEPA first11162JJfirst ?11163SENT? Is11164VBZbe that11165IN/thatthat an11166DTan accurate11167JJaccurate way11168NNway of11169INof looking11170VVGlook at11171INat it11172PPit ?11173SENT? [MR. PALMORE]11174LOC[MR. PALMORE] That11175DTthat is11176VBZbe ,11177,, Your11178PP$your Honor11179NPHonor .11180SENT. So11181INso they11182PPthey ...11183:... the11184DTthe presumption11185NNpresumption is11186VBZbe we11187PPwe are11188VBPbe private11189JJprivate property11190NNproperty owners11191NNSowner ,11192,, that11193WDTthat we11194PPwe have11195VHPhave control11196NNcontrol of11197INof our11198PP$our own11199JJown property11200NNproperty ,11201,, and11202CCand we11203PPwe can11204MDcan remove11205VVremove arsenic11206NNarsenic on11207INon our11208PP$our own11209JJown property11210NNproperty if11211INif we11212PPwe want11213VVPwant to11214TOto .11215SENT. Nothing11216NNnothing in11217INin their11218PP$their 1711219CD@card@ 12211220CD@card@ (11221(( e11222LSe )11223)) (11224(( 611225CD6 )11226)) argument11227NNargument ...11228:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11229LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] The11230DTthe question11231NNquestion is11232VBZbe whether11233INwhether CERCLA11234NPCERCLA displaces11235VVZdisplace that11236DTthat presumption11237NNpresumption .11238SENT. [MR. PALMORE]11239LOC[MR. PALMORE] Whether11240NPWhether CERCLA11241NPCERCLA displaces11242VVZdisplace that11243IN/thatthat forever11244RBforever ...11245:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11246LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Right11247NPRight .11248SENT. [MR. PALMORE]11249LOC[MR. PALMORE] Right11250NPRight ?11251SENT? A11252DTa thousand11253CDthousand years11254NNSyear from11255INfrom now11256RBnow ,11257,, under11258INunder their11259PP$their view11260NNview ,11261,, we11262PPwe would11263MDwould ...11264:... if11265INif we11266PPwe wanted11267VVDwant to11268TOto remove11269VVremove a11270DTa shovelful11271NNshovelful ...11272:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11273LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But11274CCbut either11275RBeither ...11276:... [MR. PALMORE]11277LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...11278:... of11279INof dirt11280NNdirt ...11281:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11282LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...11283:... way11284NNway ...11285:... sorry11286RBsorry to11287TOto interrupt11288VVinterrupt .11289SENT. Either11290DTeither way11291NNway ,11292,, EPA11293NPEPA would11294MDwould have11295VHhave the11296DTthe say11297NNsay .11298SENT. It11299PPit 's11300VBZbe just11301RBjust whether11302INwhether EPA11303NPEPA initiates11304NNSinitiate or11305CCor you11306PPyou go11307VVPgo to11308TOto EPA11309NPEPA .11310SENT. I11311PPI think11312VVPthink you11313PPyou just11314RBjust said11315VVDsay that11316DTthat .11317SENT. [MR. PALMORE]11318LOC[MR. PALMORE] Yeah11319NPYeah ,11320,, but11321CCbut I11322PPI think11323VVPthink the11324DTthe default11325NNdefault rule11326NNrule is11327VBZbe critical11328JJcritical ,11329,, right11330RBright ?11331SENT? I11332PPI mean11333VVPmean ,11334,, we11335PPwe have11336VHPhave the11337DTthe bundle11338NNbundle of11339INof property11340NNproperty rights11341NNSright ...11342:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11343LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Yeah11344NPYeah .11345SENT. [MR. PALMORE]11346LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...11347:... and11348CCand if11349INif we11350PPwe ,11351,, you11352PPyou know11353VVPknow ,11354,, commit11355VVPcommit an11356DTan environmental11357JJenvironmental offense11358NNoffense ,11359,, then11360RBthen EPA11361NPEPA as11362INas a11363DTa regulator11364NNregulator can11365MDcan use11366VVuse its11367PP$its power11368NNpower ...11369:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]11370LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] What11371WPWhat would11372MDwould the11373DTthe ...11374:... [MR. PALMORE]11375LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...11376:... to11377TOto go11378VVgo after11379INafter us11380PPus .11381SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]11382LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...11383:... government11384NNgovernment have11385VHPhave to11386TOto show11387VVshow ?11388SENT? What11389WPWhat 's11390VBZbe the11391DTthe ...11392:... what11393WPwhat would11394MDwould ...11395:... what11396WPwhat would11397MDwould the11398DTthe test11399NNtest be11400VBbe ?11401SENT? What11402WPWhat would11403MDwould the11404DTthe legal11405JJlegal standard11406NNstandard be11407VBbe ?11408SENT? [MR. PALMORE]11409LOC[MR. PALMORE] If11410INif ...11411:... if11412INif they11413PPthey went11414VVDgo after11415INafter us11416PPus ,11417,, it11418PPit would11419MDwould be11420VBbe a11421DTa violation11422NNviolation of11423INof ...11424:... of11425INof CERCLA11426NPCERCLA .11427SENT. These11428DTthese are11429VBPbe the11430DTthe ...11431:... this11432DTthis is11433VBZbe what11434WPwhat ...11435:... and11436CCand the11437DTthe government11438NNgovernment itself11439PPitself took11440VVDtake the11441DTthe position11442NNposition that11443IN/thatthat those11444DTthose tools11445NNStool are11446VBPbe fully11447RBfully adequate11448JJadequate here11449RBhere to11450TOto protect11451VVprotect the11452DTthe integrity11453NNintegrity of11454INof the11455DTthe remedy11456NNremedy .11457SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]11458LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] These11459DTthese things11460NNSthing are11461VBPbe likely11462JJlikely to11463TOto be11464VBbe pretty11465RBpretty complicated11466VVNcomplicate .11467SENT. And11468CCand if11469INif we11470PPwe ...11471:... one11472CDone way11473NNway ,11474,, it11475PPit 's11476VBZbe central11477JJcentral ,11478,, everyone11479NNeveryone goes11480VVZgo to11481TOto EPA11482NPEPA ,11483,, and11484CCand there11485EXthere 's11486VBZbe a11487DTa central11488JJcentral review11489NNreview in11490INin court11491NNcourt .11492SENT. The11493DTthe other11494JJother way11495NNway ,11496,, you11497PPyou want11498VVPwant EPA11499NPEPA to11500TOto go11501VVgo to11502TOto any11503DTany place11504NNplace where11505WRBwhere a11506DTa landowner11507NNlandowner has11508VHZhave a11509DTa law11510NNlaw in11511INin ...11512:... in11513INin his11514PP$his favor11515NNfavor that11516WDTthat lets11517VVZlet him11518PPhim do11519VVPdo some11520DTsome things11521NNSthing ,11522,, and11523CCand EPA11524NPEPA is11525VBZbe going11526VVGgo to11527TOto have11528VHhave to11529TOto prove11530VVprove that11531IN/thatthat this11532DTthis particular11533JJparticular thing11534NNthing in11535INin each11536DTeach of11537INof these11538DTthese cases11539NNScase is11540VBZbe a11541DTa CERCLA11542NPCERCLA violation11543NNviolation ,11544,, which11545WDTwhich is11546VBZbe already11547RBalready a11548DTa standard11549NNstandard that11550WDTthat 's11551VBZbe ...11552:... it11553PPit might11554MDmight not11555RBnot ,11556,, it11557PPit might11558MDmight just11559RBjust be11560VBbe an11561DTan interference11562NNinterference with11563INwith their11564PP$their plan11565NNplan .11566SENT. It11567PPit might11568MDmight just11569RBjust be11570VBbe raising11571VVGraise the11572DTthe cost11573NNcost of11574INof their11575PP$their plan11576NNplan .11577SENT. It11578PPit might11579MDmight be11580VBbe who11581WPwho knows11582VVZknow .11583SENT. I11584PPI 'm11585VBPbe not11586RBnot an11587DTan expert11588NNexpert in11589INin this11590DTthis .11591SENT. But11592CCbut that11593WDTthat 's11594VBZbe ...11595:... that11596WDTthat 's11597VBZbe the11598DTthe question11599NNquestion :11600:: How11601WRBHow did11602VVDdo Congress11603NPCongress want11604VVPwant this11605DTthis to11606TOto work11607VVwork ?11608SENT? [MR. PALMORE]11609LOC[MR. PALMORE] Right11610RBright .11611SENT. And11612CCand one11613PPone can11614MDcan imagine11615VVimagine Congress11616NPCongress writing11617VVGwrite a11618DTa statute11619NNstatute to11620TOto give11621VVgive EPA11622NPEPA complete11623JJcomplete control11624NNcontrol ,11625,, but11626CCbut it11627PPit did11628VVDdo n't11629RBn't ...11630:... it11631PPit did11632VVDdo n't11633RBn't do11634VVdo that11635DTthat .11636SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]11637LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And11638CCand it11639PPit might11640MDmight have11641VHhave used11642VVNuse the11643DTthe words11644NNSword potentially11645RBpotentially responsible11646JJresponsible person11647NNperson has11648VHZhave to11649TOto go11650VVgo to11651TOto EPA11652NPEPA and11653CCand ,11654,, by11655INby that11656IN/thatthat ,11657,, meant11658VVDmean that11659IN/thatthat those11660DTthose people11661NNSpeople who11662WPwho live11663VVPlive or11664CCor own11665VVPown property11666NNproperty on11667INon a11668DTa toxic11669JJtoxic waste11670NNwaste center11671NNcenter .11672SENT. That11673DTthat 's11674VBZbe what11675WPwhat they11676PPthey argue11677VVPargue .11678SENT. [MR. PALMORE]11679LOC[MR. PALMORE] Right11680NPRight ,11681,, Your11682PP$your Honor11683NPHonor ,11684,, their11685PP$their position11686NNposition is11687VBZbe that11688IN/thatthat every11689DTevery single11690JJsingle private11691JJprivate property11692NNproperty landowner11693NNlandowner ...11694:... [JUSTICE BREYER]11695LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah11696NPYeah .11697SENT. [MR. PALMORE]11698LOC[MR. PALMORE] ...11699:... in11700INin this11701DTthis vast11702JJvast 300-square-mile11703JJ300-square-mile Superfund11704NPSuperfund site11705NNsite has11706VHZhave to11707TOto get11708VVget their11709PP$their permission11710NNpermission to11711TOto remove11712VVremove even11713RBeven a11714DTa shovelful11715NNshovelful of11716INof dirt11717NNdirt from11718INfrom their11719PP$their own11720JJown backyard11721NNbackyard .11722SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]11723LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No11724NPNo ,11725,, I11726PPI do11727VVPdo n't11728RBn't know11729VVknow that11730WDTthat they11731PPthey ...11732:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11733LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well11734UHWell ,11735,, but11736CCbut that11737DTthat 's11738VBZbe the11739DTthe reason11740NNreason ,11741,, though11742RBthough ...11743:... [MR. PALMORE]11744LOC[MR. PALMORE] That11745DTthat is11746VBZbe page11747NNpage 3411748CD@card@ of11749INof the11750DTthe Blue11751NPBlue Brief11752NPBrief .11753SENT. ARCO11754NPARCO says11755VVZsay remedial11756JJremedial action11757NNaction covers11758VVZcover virtually11759RBvirtually any11760DTany physical11761JJphysical action11762NNaction with11763INwith respect11764NNrespect to11765TOto hazardous11766JJhazardous waste11767NNwaste at11768INat the11769DTthe site11770NNsite ,11771,, including11772VVGinclude storage11773NNstorage ,11774,, excavation11775NNexcavation .11776SENT. It11777PPit has11778VHZhave a11779DTa list11780NNlist there11781RBthere .11782SENT. It11783PPit 's11784VBZbe virtually11785RBvirtually anything11786NNanything .11787SENT. They11788PPthey 're11789VBPbe saying11790VVGsay that11791IN/thatthat our11792PP$our ...11793:... my11794PP$my clients11795NNSclient in11796INin Opportunity11797NPOpportunity ,11798,, Montana11799NPMontana ,11800,, have11801VHPhave to11802TOto get11803VVget permission11804NNpermission from11805INfrom EPA11806NPEPA in11807INin Washington11808NPWashington if11809INif they11810PPthey want11811VVPwant to11812TOto dig11813VVdig out11814RPout part11815NNpart of11816INof their11817PP$their backyard11818NNbackyard to11819TOto put11820VVput in11821INin a11822DTa sandbox11823NNsandbox for11824INfor their11825PP$their grandchildren11826NNSgrandchild and11827CCand ...11828:... [JUSTICE BREYER]11829LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And11830CCand are11831VBPbe you11832PPyou saying11833VVGsay also11834RBalso it11835PPit 's11836VBZbe an11837DTan ...11838:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11839LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well11840UHwell ,11841,, you11842PPyou can11843MDcan say11844VVsay dig11845NNdig out11846RPout ...11847:... you11848PPyou can11849MDcan say11850VVsay dig11851VVdig out11852RPout part11853NNpart of11854INof their11855PP$their backyard11856NNbackyard .11857SENT. EPA11858NPEPA would11859MDwould say11860VVsay if11861INif you11862PPyou want11863VVPwant to11864TOto disturb11865VVdisturb arsenic-infected11866JJarsenic-infected land11867NNland ,11868,, dirt11869NNdirt in11870INin a11871DTa way11872NNway that11873WDTthat would11874MDwould not11875RBnot only11876RBonly harm11877VVharm your11878PP$your neighbors11879NNSneighbor but11880CCbut could11881MDcould harm11882VVharm people11883NNSpeople many11884JJmany ...11885:... many11886JJmany miles11887NNSmile away11888RBaway .11889SENT. I11890PPI mean11891VVPmean ,11892,, yes11893UHyes ,11894,, you11895PPyou want11896VVPwant to11897TOto just11898RBjust do11899VVdo things11900NNSthing ...11901:... [MR. PALMORE]11902LOC[MR. PALMORE] And11903CCand if11904INif ...11905:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11906LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] ...11907:... on11908INon your11909PP$your land11910NNland ,11911,, but11912CCbut you11913PPyou can11914MDcan 't11915RB't overlook11916VVPoverlook the11917DTthe fact11918NNfact that11919IN/thatthat that11920DTthat is11921VBZbe going11922VVGgo to11923TOto have11924VHhave harmful11925JJharmful effects11926NNSeffect on11927INon everybody11928NNeverybody else11929RBelse around11930INaround you11931PPyou .11932SENT. [MR. PALMORE]11933LOC[MR. PALMORE] And11934CCand if11935INif you11936PPyou assume11937VVPassume that11938DTthat harm11939NNharm that11940WDTthat 's11941VBZbe assumed11942VVNassume ,11943,, embedded11944VVNembed ,11945,, in11946INin your11947PP$your question11948NNquestion ,11949,, they11950PPthey have11951VHPhave the11952DTthe tools11953NNStool to11954TOto go11955VVgo after11956INafter that11957DTthat .11958SENT. What11959WPWhat I11960PPI 'm11961VBPbe talking11962VVGtalk about11963RBabout is11964VBZbe when11965WRBwhen there11966EXthere 's11967VBZbe no11968RBno showing11969VVGshow of11970INof harm11971NNharm .11972SENT. Their11973PP$their argument11974NNargument is11975VBZbe whether11976INwhether there11977EXthere 's11978VBZbe harm11979NNharm or11980CCor not11981RBnot ,11982,, we11983PPwe have11984VHPhave to11985TOto get11986VVget their11987PP$their permission11988NNpermission .11989SENT. And11990CCand if11991INif I11992PPI can11993MDcan ...11994:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]11995LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] I11996PPI guess11997VVPguess the11998DTthe ...11999:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12000LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Just12001RBjust ...12002:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]12003LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...12004:... question12005NNquestion ,12006,, though12007RBthough ,12008,, is12009VBZbe ...12010:... and12011CCand ,12012,, you12013PPyou know12014VVPknow ,12015,, you12016PPyou might12017MDmight say12018VVsay ,12019,, look12020VVlook ,12021,, this12022DTthis is12023VBZbe a12024DTa policy12025NNpolicy matter12026NNmatter and12027CCand Congress12028NPCongress decided12029VVDdecide it12030PPit .12031SENT. But12032CCbut I12033PPI guess12034VVPguess the12035DTthe question12036NNquestion is12037VBZbe it12038PPit ...12039:... it12040PPit 's12041VBZbe hard12042JJhard for12043INfor EPA12044NPEPA to12045TOto go12046VVgo around12047RParound and12048CCand try12049VVtry to12050TOto figure12051VVfigure out12052RPout who12053WPwho 's12054VBZbe creating12055VVGcreate sandboxes12056NNSsandbox .12057SENT. And12058CCand so12059RBso why12060WRBwhy should12061MDshould the12062DTthe onus12063NNonus be12064VBbe on12065INon EPA12066NPEPA to12067TOto figure12068VVfigure out12069RPout who12070WPwho 's12071VBZbe creating12072VVGcreate sandboxes12073NNSsandbox ?12074SENT? [MR. PALMORE]12075LOC[MR. PALMORE] Well12076UHWell ,12077,, EPA12078NPEPA is12079VBZbe ,12080,, of12081INof course12082NNcourse ,12083,, all12084RBall over12085INover this12086DTthis site12087NNsite ,12088,, and12089CCand it12090PPit can12091MDcan enforce12092VVenforce the12093DTthe law12094NNlaw here12095RBhere .12096SENT. The12097DTthe question12098NNquestion is12099VBZbe whether12100INwhether we12101PPwe are12102VBPbe ...12103:... should12104MDshould be12105VBbe similarly12106RBsimilarly situated12107VVNsituate to12108TOto just12109RBjust you12110PPyou and12111CCand me12112PPme and12113CCand any12114DTany American12115JJAmerican who12116WPwho ,12117,, if12118INif we12119PPwe violate12120VVPviolate the12121DTthe law12122NNlaw ,12123,, the12124DTthe regulator12125NNregulator ,12126,, the12127DTthe law12128NNlaw enforcement12129NNenforcement ,12130,, can12131MDcan come12132VVcome after12133INafter us12134PPus ,12135,, or12136CCor whether12137INwhether we12138PPwe have12139VHPhave this12140DTthis kind12141NNkind of12142INof superintending12143VVGsuperintend presence12144NNpresence of12145INof agency12146NNagency authority12147NNauthority over12148INover us12149PPus and12150CCand our12151PP$our private12152JJprivate property12153NNproperty for12154INfor the12155DTthe rest12156NNrest of12157INof our12158PP$our lives12159NNSlife .12160SENT. And12161CCand that12162DTthat 's12163VBZbe not12164RBnot what12165WPwhat ...12166:... that12167WDTthat 's12168VBZbe not12169RBnot the12170DTthe scheme12171NNscheme that12172IN/thatthat Congress12173NPCongress created12174VVDcreate .12175SENT. It12176PPit went12177VVDgo out12178RPout of12179INof its12180PP$its way12181NNway to12182TOto allow12183VVallow state12184NNstate law12185NNlaw over12186INover these12187DTthese traditionally12188RBtraditionally state12189NNstate law12190NNlaw subjects12191NNSsubject to12192TOto continue12193VVcontinue .12194SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12195LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But12196CCbut your12197PP$your ...12198:... your12199PP$your ...12200:... your12201PP$your parade12202NNparade of12203INof horribles12204NNShorrible can12205MDcan still12206RBstill come12207VVcome true12208JJtrue with12209INwith EPA12210NPEPA being12211VBGbe aggressive12212JJaggressive in12213INin getting12214VVGget to12215TOto all12216PDTall those12217DTthose places12218NNSplace .12219SENT. So12220RBso really12221RBreally the12222DTthe question12223NNquestion that12224WDTthat ...12225:... [MR. PALMORE]12226LOC[MR. PALMORE] If12227INif ...12228:... if12229INif they12230PPthey want12231VVPwant to12232TOto come12233VVcome out12234RPout ...12235:... you12236PPyou 're12237VBPbe right12238JJright .12239SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12240LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...12241:... the12242DTthe question12243NNquestion Justice12244NPJustice Breyer12245NPBreyer asked12246VVNask is12247VBZbe does12248VVZdo it12249PPit make12250VVmake sense12251NNsense to12252TOto have12253VHhave you12254PPyou go12255VVgo to12256TOto EPA12257NPEPA first12258RBfirst so12259RBso that12260IN/thatthat they12261PPthey can12262MDcan maintain12263VVmaintain control12264NNcontrol ?12265SENT? "12266``" Comprehensive12267NPComprehensive "12268''" is12269VBZbe the12270DTthe word12271NNword in12272INin the12273DTthe statute12274NNstatute after12275INafter all12276DTall .12277SENT. [MR. PALMORE]12278LOC[MR. PALMORE] Your12279PP$your Honor12280NPHonor ,12281,, there12282EXthere 's12283VBZbe no12284DTno evidence12285NNevidence that12286IN/thatthat Congress12287NPCongress intended12288VVDintend this12289DTthis obscure12290JJobscure corner12291NNcorner of12292INof Section12293NPSection 12212294CD@card@ about12295INabout settlements12296NNSsettlement to12297TOto give12298VVgive EPA12299NPEPA that12300DTthat kind12301NNkind of12302INof vast12303JJvast control12304NNcontrol forever12305RBforever over12306INover private12307JJprivate property12308NNproperty .12309SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12310LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank12311VVthank you12312PPyou ,12313,, counsel12314NNcounsel .12315SENT. Three12316CDThree minutes12317NNSminute ,12318,, Ms12319NNMs .12320SENT. Blatt12321NPBlatt .12322SENT.

[MS. BLATT]12323LOC[MS. BLATT] Thank12324VVthank you12325PPyou ,12326,, Mr12327NPMr .12328SENT. Chief12329NPChief Justice12330NPJustice .12331SENT. Justice12332NPJustice Sotomayor12333NPSotomayor ,12334,, I12335PPI answered12336VVDanswer one12337CDone of12338INof your12339PP$your questions12340NNSquestion incorrectly12341RBincorrectly on12342INon a12343DTa cite12344VVPcite ,12345,, and12346CCand I12347PPI ...12348:... I12349PPI need12350VVPneed to12351TOto correct12352VVcorrect it12353PPit .12354SENT. Section12355NNsection 10712356CD@card@ (12357(( q12358NNq )12359)) (12360(( 112361LS1 )12362)) (12363(( A12364NPA )12365)) 312366CD3 through12367INthrough 512368CD5 is12369VBZbe the12370DTthe contiguous12371JJcontiguous landowner12372NNlandowner provision12373NNprovision that12374WDTthat says12375VVZsay if12376INif you12377PPyou live12378VVPlive on12379INon a12380DTa Superfund12381NPSuperfund site12382NNsite ,12383,, no12384DTno matter12385NNmatter what12386WPwhat ,12387,, you12388PPyou have12389VHPhave to12390TOto make12391VVmake sure12392RBsure you12393PPyou comply12394VVcomply and12395CCand not12396RBnot interfere12397VVinterfere with12398INwith EPA12399NPEPA .12400SENT. So12401RBso there12402EXthere 's12403VBZbe provisions12404NNSprovision throughout12405INthroughout CERCLA12406NPCERCLA that12407WDTthat say12408VVPsay no12409RBno matter12410VVmatter what12411WPwhat your12412PP$your defenses12413NNSdefense may12414MDmay be12415VBbe ,12416,, you12417PPyou always12418RBalways are12419VBPbe on12420INon the12421DTthe hook12422NNhook to12423TOto not12424RBnot do12425VVdo anything12426NNanything to12427TOto interfere12428VVinterfere with12429INwith EPA12430NPEPA 's12431POS's remedy12432NNremedy .12433SENT. And12434CCand I12435PPI just12436RBjust gave12437VVDgive you12438PPyou different12439JJdifferent cites12440VVZcite .12441SENT. So12442RBso ,12443,, on12444INon PRPs12445NPPRPs ,12446,, in12447INin terms12448NNSterm of12449INof this12450DTthis is12451VBZbe a12452DTa status12453NNstatus and12454CCand not12455RBnot a12456DTa financial12457JJfinancial liability12458NNliability ,12459,, EPA12460NPEPA ,12461,, they12462PPthey 're12463VBPbe always12464RBalways liable12465JJliable under12466INunder 10612467CD@card@ for12468INfor abatement12469NNabatement .12470SENT. And12471CCand they12472PPthey 're12473VBPbe always12474RBalways liable12475JJliable in12476INin a12477DTa suit12478NNsuit by12479INby Atlantic12480NPAtlantic Richfield12481NPRichfield when12482WRBwhen the12483DTthe cleanup12484NNcleanup ends12485VVZend under12486INunder Section12487NPSection 11312488CD@card@ (12489(( g12490NNg )12491)) (12492(( 212493LS2 )12494)) (12495(( A12496NPA )12497)) .12498SENT. We12499PPwe might12500MDmight not12501RBnot get12502VVget much12503JJmuch money12504NNmoney ,12505,, but12506CCbut they12507PPthey 're12508VBPbe ...12509:... they12510PPthey 're12511VBPbe definitely12512RBdefinitely on12513INon the12514DTthe hook12515NNhook .12516SENT. But12517CCbut the12518DTthe real12519JJreal question12520NNquestion is12521VBZbe one12522CDone of12523INof status12524NNstatus .12525SENT. And12526CCand it12527PPit 's12528VBZbe ...12529:... Justice12530NPJustice Gorsuch12531NPGorsuch and12532CCand Justice12533NPJustice Kavanaugh12534NPKavanaugh ,12535,, you12536PPyou were12537VBDbe wrong12538JJwrong on12539INon this12540DTthis as12541INas being12542VBGbe a12543DTa question12544NNquestion of12545INof who12546WPwho has12547VHZhave to12548TOto sue12549VVsue and12550CCand a12551DTa burden12552NNburden .12553SENT. EPA12554NPEPA would12555MDwould have12556VHhave no12557DTno way12558NNway of12559INof knowing12560VVGknow what12561WPwhat ...12562:... they12563PPthey only12564RBonly know12565VVPknow in12566INin this12567DTthis case12568NNcase and12569CCand wrote12570VVDwrite them12571PPthem a12572DTa letter12573NNletter because12574INbecause there12575EXthere 's12576VBZbe a12577DTa lawsuit12578NNlawsuit and12579CCand a12580DTa Supreme12581NPSupreme Court12582NPCourt case12583NNcase in12584INin the12585DTthe state12586NNstate of12587INof Montana12588NPMontana ,12589,, but12590CCbut there12591EXthere are12592VBPbe hundreds12593NNShundred of12594INof thousands12595NNSthousand of12596INof people12597NNSpeople who12598WPwho live12599VVPlive on12600INon ...12601:... live12602VVlive on12603INon Superfund12604NPSuperfund sites12605NNSsite with12606INwith uranium12607NNuranium and12608CCand God12609NPGod knows12610VVZknow what12611WPwhat else12612RBelse ,12613,, and12614CCand how12615WRBhow is12616VBZbe EPA12617NPEPA exactly12618RBexactly supposed12619VVDsuppose to12620TOto know12621VVknow when12622WRBwhen someone12623NNsomeone is12624VBZbe removing12625VVGremove uranium12626NNuranium ?12627SENT? It12628PPit has12629VHZhave a12630DTa half-life12631NNhalf-life of12632INof 412633CD4 .12634SENT. 712635CD7 billion12636CDbillion years12637NNSyear .12638SENT. Arsenic12639NNarsenic has12640VHZhave no12641DTno half-life12642NNhalf-life .12643SENT. It12644PPit always12645RBalways is12646VBZbe there12647RBthere .12648SENT. It12649PPit cannot12650MDcan be12651VBbe destroyed12652VVNdestroy .12653SENT. It12654PPit does12655VVZdo n't12656RBn't evaporate12657VVevaporate .12658SENT. So12659RBso ,12660,, yeah12661RByeah ,12662,, they12663PPthey have12664VHPhave some12665DTsome restrictions12666NNSrestriction before12667INbefore they12668PPthey move12669VVPmove hazardous12670JJhazardous waste12671NNwaste .12672SENT. The12673DTthe other12674JJother thing12675NNthing is12676VBZbe in12677INin terms12678NNSterm of12679INof who12680WPwho you12681PPyou 'd12682MDwould have12683VHhave to12684TOto sue12685VVsue ,12686,, I12687PPI would12688MDwould freak12689VVfreak out12690RPout if12691INif I12692PPI got12693VVDget a12694DTa ...12695:... a12696DTa ...12697:... a12698DTa letter12699NNletter .12700SENT. Their12701PP$their view12702NNview is12703VBZbe you12704PPyou have12705VHPhave to12706TOto sue12707VVsue these12708DTthese poor12709JJpoor innocent12710JJinnocent landowners12711NNSlandowner and12712CCand say12713VVPsay you12714PPyou 're12715VBPbe liable12716JJliable under12717INunder CERCLA12718NPCERCLA .12719SENT. Just12720RBjust so12721RBso you12722PPyou know12723VVPknow ,12724,, that12725WDTthat 's12726VBZbe the12727DTthe only12728JJonly way12729NNway we12730PPwe can12731MDcan keep12732VVkeep control12733NNcontrol of12734INof the12735DTthe site12736NNsite .12737SENT. That12738DTthat 's12739VBZbe the12740DTthe only12741JJonly way12742NNway we12743PPwe 're12744VBPbe going12745VVGgo to12746TOto know12747VVknow and12748CCand then12749RBthen ,12750,, you12751PPyou know12752VVPknow ,12753,, now12754RBnow they12755PPthey 're12756VBPbe on12757INon notice12758NNnotice because12759INbecause ,12760,, otherwise12761RBotherwise ,12762,, you12763PPyou would12764MDwould have12765VHhave this12766DTthis metaphysical12767JJmetaphysical thing12768NNthing of12769INof who12770WPwho knows12771VVZknow who12772WPwho 's12773VBZbe liable12774JJliable ?12775SENT? In12776INin terms12777NNSterm of12778INof the12779DTthe taking12780VVGtake issue12781NNissue ,12782,, and12783CCand I12784PPI think12785VVPthink that12786IN/thatthat Justice12787NPJustice ...12788:... I12789PPI mean12790VVPmean ,12791,, you12792PPyou guys12793VVZguy already12794RBalready answered12795VVNanswer this12796DTthis ,12797,, but12798CCbut this12799DTthis is12800VBZbe really12801RBreally a12802DTa question12803NNquestion of12804INof do12805VVdo you12806PPyou have12807VHPhave to12808TOto go12809VVgo to12810TOto EPA12811NPEPA .12812SENT. If12813INif EPA12814NPEPA denies12815VVZdeny permission12816NNpermission and12817CCand they12818PPthey want12819VVPwant to12820TOto bring12821VVbring a12822DTa takings12823NNStaking claim12824VVPclaim ,12825,, go12826VVPgo sue12827VVsue EPA12828NPEPA .12829SENT. There12830EXthere 's12831VBZbe also12832RBalso a12833DTa citizen12834NNcitizen suit12835NNsuit provision12836NNprovision that12837IN/thatthat in12838INin 202512839CD@card@ ,12840,, they12841PPthey can12842MDcan bring12843VVbring a12844DTa lawsuit12845NNlawsuit and12846CCand say12847VVPsay :12848:: EPA12849NPEPA ,12850,, your12851PP$your remedy12852NNremedy was12853VBDbe terrible12854JJterrible ,12855,, we12856PPwe do12857VVPdo n't12858RBn't like12859VVlike it12860PPit ,12861,, it12862PPit violated12863VVDviolate CERCLA12864NPCERCLA ,12865,, come12866VVNcome up12867RPup with12868INwith a12869DTa new12870JJnew one12871CDone .12872SENT. That12873DTthat ...12874:... that12875WDTthat 's12876VBZbe what12877WPwhat the12878DTthe citizen12879NNcitizen suit12880NNsuit provision12881NNprovision is12882VBZbe before12883RBbefore ...12884:... for12885INfor .12886SENT. On12887INon the12888DTthe mouse12889NNmouse hole12890NNhole point12891NNpoint ,12892,, I12893PPI do12894VVPdo n't12895RBn't think12896VVthink it12897PPit 's12898VBZbe a12899DTa mouse12900NNmouse hole12901NNhole .12902SENT. So12903RBso it12904PPit has12905VHZhave mouses12906VVZmouse or12907CCor elephants12908NNSelephant ,12909,, I12910PPI guess12911VVPguess ,12912,, all12913PDTall the12914DTthe way12915NNway in12916INin the12917DTthe statute12918NNstatute .12919SENT. There12920EXthere are12921VBPbe provision12922NNprovision after12923INafter provision12924NNprovision in12925INin the12926DTthe contiguous12927JJcontiguous landowner12928NNlandowner ,12929,, in12930INin the12931DTthe demicrominimus12932NNdemicrominimus ...12933:... or12934CCor whatever12935WDTwhatever that12936DTthat word12937NNword is12938VBZbe ...12939:... in12940INin the12941DTthe bona12942NNbona fide12943NNfide landowner12944NNlandowner that12945WDTthat says12946VVZsay at12947INat all12948DTall times12949NNStime you12950PPyou have12951VHPhave to12952TOto make12953VVmake sure12954JJsure you12955PPyou do12956VVPdo n't12957RBn't interfere12958VVinterfere with12959INwith EPA12960NPEPA 's12961POS's remedy12962NNremedy .12963SENT. Thank12964VVthank you12965PPyou .12966SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12967LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank12968VVthank you12969PPyou ,12970,, counsel12971NNcounsel .12972SENT. The12973DTthe case12974NNcase is12975VBZbe submitted12976VVNsubmit .12977SENT.