<s> /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/ptreetagger/BNSF.xml-src.tt /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/treetagger/BNSF.xml-out.tt pos tagset built from model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par en lemma of the model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par - [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We2PPwe 'll3MDwill hear4VVhear argument5NNargument next6JJnext in7INin Case8NPCase 17-10429CD@card@ ,10,, BNSF11NPBNSF Railway12NPRailway Company13NPCompany versus14CCversus Loos15NPLoos .16SENT. Ms17NNMs .18SENT. Blatt19NPBlatt .20SENT. [MS. BLATT]21LOC[MS. BLATT] Justice22NPJustice Breyer's23NPBreyer's ...24:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]25LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] He26PPhe 'll27MDwill be28VBbe back29RBback .30SENT. [MS. BLATT]31LOC[MS. BLATT] Okay32NPOkay .33SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]34LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank35VVthank you36PPyou ,37,, though38RBthough .39SENT. [40SYM[ LAUGHTER41NNlaughter ]42SYM]

[MS. BLATT]43LOC[MS. BLATT] Thank44VVthank you45PPyou ,46,, Mr47NPMr .48SENT. Chief49NPChief Justice50NPJustice ,51,, and52CCand may53MDmay it54PPit please55VVplease the56DTthe Court57NPCourt :58:: For59INfor three60CDthree reasons61NNSreason ,62,, payment63NNpayment by64INby an65DTan employer66NNemployer to67TOto an68DTan employee69NNemployee for70INfor lost71VVNlose wages72NNSwage under73INunder FELA74NPFela is75VBZbe compensation76NNcompensation under77INunder Section78NPSection 323179CD@card@ (80(( e81LSe )82)) (83(( 184LS1 )85)) of86INof the87DTthe Railroad88NPRailroad Retirement89NPRetirement Tax90NPTax Act91NPAct ,92,, or93CCor RRTA94NPRRTA .95SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]96LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Ms97NNMs .98SENT. Blatt99NPBlatt ,100,, before101INbefore you102PPyou launch103VVlaunch into104INinto that105DTthat ,106,, can107MDcan you108PPyou tell109VVtell us110PPus why111WRBwhy the112DTthe railroad113NNrailroad cares114VVZcare ?115SENT? I116PPI mean117VVPmean ,118,, if119INif he120PPhe does121VVZdo n't122RBn't ...123:... if124INif it125PPit 's126VBZbe not127RBnot ...128:... he129PPhe 's130VBZbe not131RBnot subject132JJsubject to133TOto the134DTthe tax135NNtax ,136,, neither137CCneither is138VBZbe the139DTthe employer140NNemployer .141SENT. So142RBso what143WPwhat ...144:... what145WPwhat is146VBZbe the147DTthe stake148NNstake that149IN/thatthat you150PPyou have151VHPhave in152INin this153DTthis ?154SENT? [MS. BLATT]155LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure156NPSure .157SENT. I158PPI mean159VVPmean ,160,, although161INalthough the162DTthe ...163:... the164DTthe Respondent165NNrespondent argues166VVZargue that167IN/thatthat the168DTthe employer169NNemployer is170VBZbe subject171JJsubject on172INon his173PP$his fallback174NNfallback ,175,, but176CCbut generally177RBgenerally to178TOto answer179VVanswer your180PP$your question181NNquestion ,182,, the183DTthe employer184NNemployer cares185VVZcare because186INbecause under187INunder a188DTa system189NNsystem that190WDTthat would191MDwould credit192VVcredit all193DTall lost194JJlost wage195NNwage FELA196NPFela awards197VVZaward to198TOto retirement199NNretirement benefits200NNSbenefit but201CCbut without202INwithout any203DTany ...204:... any205DTany tax206NNtax burden207NNburden has208VHZhave a209DTa long-term210JJlong-term risk211NNrisk of212INof insolvency213NNinsolvency or214CCor instability215NNinstability to216TOto the217DTthe system218NNsystem .219SENT. So220RBso there221EXthere 's222VBZbe a223DTa short-term224JJshort-term savings225NNSsaving to226TOto be227VBbe sure228JJsure ,229,, and230CCand ,231,, generally232RBgenerally ,233,, people234NNSpeople do235VVPdo n't236RBn't like237VVlike to238TOto pay239VVpay taxes240NNStaxis for241INfor the242DTthe sake243NNsake of244INof taxes245NNStaxis ,246,, but247CCbut the248DTthe entire249JJentire purpose250NNpurpose of251INof this252DTthis Tax253NPTax Act254NPAct is255VBZbe to256TOto fund257VVfund the258DTthe retirement259NNretirement benefits260NNSbenefit for261INfor railroad262NNrailroad employees263NNSemployee ,264,, and265CCand pensions266NNSpension are267VBPbe good268JJgood for269INfor the270DTthe railroads271NNSrailroad .272SENT. So273RBso that274DTthat 's275VBZbe the276DTthe answer277NNanswer .278SENT. If279INif I280PPI could281MDcould get282VVget to283TOto the284DTthe ...285:... the286DTthe three287CDthree reasons288NNSreason .289SENT. First290NPFirst ...291:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]292LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But293CCbut there294EXthere 's295VBZbe no296RBno personal297JJpersonal ...298:... [MS. BLATT]299LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure300RBsure .301SENT. Sorry302RBsorry .303SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]304LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] There305EXthere 's306VBZbe no307DTno personal308JJpersonal interest309NNinterest in310INin the311DTthe sense312NNsense of313INof ,314,, if315INif we316PPwe say317VVPsay that318IN/thatthat it319PPit 's320VBZbe not321RBnot ,322,, then323RBthen the324DTthe railroad325NNrailroad does326VVZdo n't327RBn't withhold328VVwithhold and329CCand pay330VVpay the331DTthe state332NNstate .333SENT. Did334VVDdo you335PPyou in336INin this337DTthis case338NNcase ?339SENT? You340PPyou wanted341VVDwant a342DTa credit343NNcredit against344INagainst the345DTthe award346NNaward ,347,, but348CCbut did349VVDdo you350PPyou ,351,, in352INin fact353NNfact ,354,, pay355NNpay anything356NNanything ,357,, any358DTany federal359JJfederal taxes360NNStaxis beforehand361RBbeforehand ?362SENT? [MS. BLATT]363LOC[MS. BLATT] Yes364NPYes .365SENT. So366INso all367DTall $368$$ 9,000369CD@card@ has370VHZhave been371VBNbe paid372VVNpay .373SENT. The374DTthe $375$$ 6,000376CD@card@ portion377NNportion of378INof the379DTthe employer380NNemployer share381NNshare was382VBDbe paid383VVNpay ,384,, and385CCand $386$$ 3,000387CD@card@ was388VBDbe withheld389VVNwithhold from390INfrom the391DTthe payment392NNpayment of393INof the394DTthe FELA395NPFela award396NNaward to397TOto account398VVaccount for399INfor the400DTthe employee401NNemployee 's402POS's share403NNshare .404SENT. And405CCand the406DTthe railroad407NNrailroad ...408:... and409CCand the410DTthe reason411NNreason why412WRBwhy the413DTthe dispute414NNdispute came415VVDcome up416RPup is417VBZbe the418DTthe railroad419NNrailroad wants420VVZwant an421DTan offset422VVNoffset for423INfor the424DTthe $425$$ 3,000426CD@card@ that427WDTthat should428MDshould have429VHhave been430VBNbe withheld431VVNwithhold from432INfrom the433DTthe railroad434NNrailroad employee435NNemployee .436SENT. So437RBso ...438:... get439VVget to440TOto the441DTthe statutory442JJstatutory text443NNtext and444CCand the445DTthe first446JJfirst reason447NNreason is448VBZbe the449DTthe statutory450JJstatutory text451NNtext and452CCand structure453NNstructure make454VVPmake clear455JJclear that456IN/thatthat such457PDTsuch a458DTa payment459NNpayment is460VBZbe for461INfor services462NNSservice rendered463VVNrender and464CCand that465IN/thatthat employees466NNSemployee need467MDneed not468RBnot be469VBbe in470INin active471JJactive service472NNservice to473TOto pay474VVpay for475INfor services476NNSservice rendered477VVNrender .478SENT. Second479RBsecond ,480,, a481DTa payment482NNpayment for483INfor lost484VVNlose wages485NNSwage under486INunder FELA487NPFela is488VBZbe no489RBno different490JJdifferent from491INfrom the492DTthe worker493NNworker 's494POS's compensation495NNcompensation ,496,, sickness497NNsickness ,498,, and499CCand disability500NNdisability pay501VVPpay that502IN/thatthat Respondent503NNrespondent agrees504VVZagree count505NNcount as506INas compensation507NNcompensation .508SENT. And509CCand ,510,, third511JJthird ,512,, taxing513VVGtax a514DTa payment515NNpayment for516INfor lost517VVNlose wages518NNSwage under519INunder FELA520NPFela furthers521VVZfurther the522DTthe RRTA523NPRRTA 's524POS's purpose525NNpurpose to526TOto fund527VVfund benefits528NNSbenefit under529INunder the530DTthe Railroad531NPRailroad Retirement532NPRetirement Act533NPAct ,534,, or535CCor RRA536NPRRA .537SENT. First538RBfirst ,539,, a540DTa payment541NNpayment for542INfor lost543VVNlose wages544NNSwage under545INunder FELA546NPFela is547VBZbe remuneration548NNremuneration paid549VVNpay for550INfor services551NNSservice rendered552VVNrender as553INas an554DTan employee555NNemployee under556INunder subsection557NNsubsection (558(( e559NNe )560)) -1561CD@card@ .562SENT. A563DTa payment564NNpayment for565INfor lost566VVNlose wages567NNSwage under568INunder FELA569NPFela compensates570VVZcompensate the571DTthe employee572NNemployee because573INbecause he574PPhe rendered575VVDrender services576NNSservice up577RPup and578CCand until579INuntil the580DTthe time581NNtime of582INof injury583NNinjury .584SENT. Indeed585RBindeed ,586,, by587INby definition588NNdefinition ,589,, an590DTan employee591NNemployee cannot592MDcan recover593VVrecover lost594VVNlose wages595NNSwage under596INunder FELA597NPFela unless598INunless he599PPhe had600VHDhave been601VBNbe rendering602VVGrender services603NNSservice at604INat the605DTthe time606NNtime of607INof injury608NNinjury .609SENT. Additionally610RBadditionally ,611,, this612DTthis Court613NPCourt in614INin Nierotko615NPNierotko and616CCand Quality617NPQuality Stores618NPSStores interpreted619VVDinterpret virtually620RBvirtually identical621JJidentical language622NNlanguage under623INunder the624DTthe Social625NPSocial Security626NPSecurity Act627NPAct and628CCand FICA629NPFICA .630SENT. There631RBthere ,632,, this633DTthis Court634NPCourt interpreted635VVDinterpret the636DTthe phrase637NNphrase which638WDTwhich defined639VVDdefine wages640NNSwage for641INfor services642NNSservice performed643VVNperform includes644VVZinclude all645DTall compensation646NNcompensation paid647VVNpay for648INfor the649DTthe employment650NNemployment relationship651NNrelationship .652SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]653LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Your654PP$your opposing655JJopposing counsel656NNcounsel argues657VVZargue that658IN/thatthat Nierotko659NPNierotko is660VBZbe discredited661VVNdiscredit ,662,, that663IN/thatthat that664DTthat case665NNcase did666VVDdo n't667RBn't follow668VVfollow the669DTthe text670NNtext ;671:; we672PPwe should673MDshould n't674RBn't follow675VVfollow that676DTthat methodology677NNmethodology here678RBhere .679SENT. Can680MDcan you681PPyou respond682VVrespond to683TOto that684DTthat ?685SENT? [MS. BLATT]686LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure687NPSure .688SENT. Respondent689NNrespondent argues690VVZargue that691IN/thatthat it692PPit 's693VBZbe discredited694VVNdiscredit under695INunder Cleveland696NPCleveland Indians697NPSIndians for698INfor the699DTthe very700RBvery last701JJlast portion702NNportion of703INof Nierotko704NPNierotko ,705,, which706WDTwhich has707VHZhave nothing708NNnothing to709TOto do710VVdo with711INwith the712DTthe question713NNquestion here714RBhere .715SENT. So716RBso the717DTthe very718RBvery last719JJlast two720CDtwo paragraphs721NNSparagraph of722INof Nierotko723NPNierotko said724VVDsay that725IN/thatthat you726PPyou credit727VVPcredit the728DTthe amount729NNamount of730INof lost731VVNlose wages732NNSwage in733INin the734DTthe ...735:... in736INin the737DTthe period738NNperiod for739INfor which740WDTwhich they741PPthey 're742VBPbe earned743VVNearn .744SENT. And745CCand then746RBthen Cleveland747NPCleveland Indians748NPSIndians came749VVDcome along750INalong and751CCand the752DTthe IRS753NPIRS said754VVDsay ,755,, yeah756RByeah ,757,, we758PPwe know759VVPknow that760IN/thatthat ,761,, but762CCbut we763PPwe want764VVPwant to765TOto credit766VVcredit FICA767NPFICA in768INin the769DTthe period770NNperiod paid771VVDpay .772SENT. And773CCand so774RBso ,775,, in776INin the777DTthe opinion778NNopinion for779INfor the780DTthe Court781NPCourt ,782,, Cleveland783NPCleveland Indians784NPSIndians said785VVDsay we786PPwe recognize787VVPrecognize that788IN/thatthat the789DTthe two790CDtwo should791MDshould go792VVgo in793INin tandem794NNtandem ,795,, but796CCbut we797PPwe 're798VBPbe going799VVGgo to800TOto defer801VVdefer to802TOto the803DTthe IRS804NPIRS ,805,, IRS806NPIRS 's807POS's allocation808NNallocation .809SENT. And810CCand ,811,, here812RBhere ,813,, there814EXthere 's815VBZbe a816DTa much817RBmuch more818RBRmore substantive819JJsubstantive distinction820NNdistinction because821INbecause the822DTthe employee823NNemployee wants824VVZwant all825PDTall the826DTthe benefits827NNSbenefit under828INunder the829DTthe benefits830NNSbenefit statute831NNstatute but832CCbut none833NNnone of834INof the835DTthe ability836NNability .837SENT. But838CCbut I839PPI think840VVPthink your841PP$your other842JJother question843NNquestion went844VVDgo to845TOto the846DTthe discreditedness847NNdiscreditedness .848SENT. I849PPI think850VVPthink you851PPyou mean852VVPmean somehow853RBsomehow in854INin 1946855CD@card@ the856DTthe Court857NNcourt was858VBDbe n't859RBn't reading860VVGread the861DTthe text862NNtext .863SENT. I864PPI think865VVPthink that866DTthat ...867:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]868LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] That869DTthat 's870VBZbe their871PP$their argument872NNargument .873SENT. [MS. BLATT]874LOC[MS. BLATT] I875PPI think876VVPthink that877DTthat 's878VBZbe their879PP$their argument880NNargument and881CCand I882PPI think883VVPthink it884PPit 's885VBZbe certainly886RBcertainly wrong887JJwrong .888SENT. We889PPwe fit890VVPfit the891DTthe plain892JJplain language893NNlanguage because894INbecause the895DTthe employee896NNemployee rendered897VVDrender services898NNSservice ,899,, and900CCand nothing901NNnothing in902INin the903DTthe text904NNtext says905VVZsay that906IN/thatthat you907PPyou can908MDcan 't909RB't be910VBbe paid911VVNpay for912INfor periods913NNSperiod of914INof time915NNtime when916WRBwhen you917PPyou 're918VBPbe not919RBnot in920INin active921JJactive services922NNSservice because923INbecause you924PPyou rendered925VVDrender services926NNSservice .927SENT. But928CCbut the929DTthe Court930NPCourt purported931VVDpurport to932TOto be933VBbe interpreting934VVGinterpret the935DTthe phrase936NNphrase "937''" services938NNSservice performed939VVDperform ,940,, "941``" and942CCand you943PPyou can944MDcan say945VVsay pragmatically946RBpragmatically ,947,, but948CCbut I949PPI think950VVPthink it951PPit 's952VBZbe also953RBalso textually954RBtextually ,955,, that956IN/thatthat when957WRBwhen you958PPyou have959VHPhave an960DTan employment961NNemployment relationship962NNrelationship and963CCand you964PPyou compensate965VVPcompensate the966DTthe employee967NNemployee ,968,, that969WDTthat 's970VBZbe generally971RBgenerally for972INfor services973NNSservice performed974VVNperform .975SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]976LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well977UHWell ,978,, counsel979NNcounsel ,980,, when981WRBwhen I982PPI think983VVPthink of984INof wages985NNSwage for986INfor services987NNSservice performed988VVNperform ...989:... and990CCand maybe991RBmaybe it992PPit 's993VBZbe too994RBtoo simplistic995JJsimplistic ...996:... but997CCbut I998PPI ...999:... [MS. BLATT]1000LOC[MS. BLATT] I1001PPI doubt1002VVPdoubt it1003PPit .1004SENT. [1005SYM[ LAUGHTER1006NNlaughter ]1007SYM] [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1008LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] We1009PPwe 'll1010MDwill see1011VVsee .1012SENT. I1013PPI ...1014:... I1015PPI ...1016:... I1017PPI think1018VVPthink of1019INof it1020PPit as1021INas the1022DTthe compensation1023NNcompensation that1024IN/thatthat an1025DTan ...1026:... an1027DTan employer1028NNemployer voluntarily1029RBvoluntarily gives1030VVZgive the1031DTthe employee1032NNemployee .1033SENT. So1034RBso not1035RBnot just1036RBjust the1037DTthe hourly1038JJhourly wage1039NNwage ,1040,, but1041CCbut the1042DTthe sick1043JJsick time1044NNtime ,1045,, the1046DTthe vacation1047NNvacation time1048NNtime might1049MDmight be1050VBbe included1051VVNinclude as1052INas part1053NNpart of1054INof the1055DTthe package1056NNpackage .1057SENT. For1058INfor the1059DTthe services1060NNSservice when1061WRBwhen you1062PPyou are1063VBPbe present1064JJpresent ,1065,, I1066PPI include1067VVPinclude that1068DTthat payment1069NNpayment .1070SENT. I1071PPI think1072VVPthink of1073INof a1074DTa judgment1075NNjudgment of1076INof a1077DTa court1078NNcourt for1079INfor negligence1080NNnegligence get1081VVPget ...1082:... awarded1083VVDaward involuntarily1084RBinvoluntarily against1085INagainst the1086DTthe employer1087NNemployer 's1088POS's consent1089NNconsent as1090INas something1091NNsomething very1092RBvery different1093JJdifferent .1094SENT. What1095WPWhat 's1096VBZbe wrong1097JJwrong with1098INwith that1099DTthat ?1100SENT? [MS. BLATT]1101LOC[MS. BLATT] Okay1102NPOkay .1103SENT. I1104PPI do1105VVPdo n't1106RBn't want1107VVwant to1108TOto call1109VVcall it1110PPit simplistic1111JJsimplistic ,1112,, but1113CCbut I1114PPI do1115VVPdo think1116VVthink it1117PPit 's1118VBZbe wrong1119JJwrong .1120SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1121LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Go1122NPGo ahead1123RBahead .1124SENT. [MS. BLATT]1125LOC[MS. BLATT] Okay1126NPOkay .1127SENT. Here1128RBhere 's1129VBZbe why1130WRBwhy .1131SENT. I1132PPI mean1133VVPmean ,1134,, there1135EXthere 's1136VBZbe absolutely1137RBabsolutely nothing1138NNnothing in1139INin the1140DTthe statute1141NNstatute that1142WDTthat makes1143VVZmake anything1144NNanything that1145IN/thatthat you1146PPyou said1147VVDsay relevant1148JJrelevant .1149SENT. It1150PPit just1151RBjust has1152VHZhave to1153TOto be1154VBbe a1155DTa payment1156NNpayment for1157INfor services1158NNSservice rendered1159VVNrender .1160SENT. And1161CCand nothing1162NNnothing in1163INin the1164DTthe statute1165NNstatute distinguishes1166VVZdistinguish between1167INbetween a1168DTa legal1169JJlegal obligation1170NNobligation arising1171VVGarise under1172INunder your1173PP$your contract1174NNcontract ...1175:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1176LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well1177UHWell ,1178,, but1179RBbut ,1180,, see1181VVsee ,1182,, that1183WDTthat 's1184VBZbe not1185RBnot services1186NNSservice rendered1187VVDrender ,1188,, is1189VBZbe it1190PPit ?1191SENT? It1192PPit 's1193VBZbe payment1194NNpayment for1195INfor a1196DTa judgment1197NNjudgment of1198INof a1199DTa court1200NNcourt .1201SENT. [MS. BLATT]1202LOC[MS. BLATT] Right1203RBright .1204SENT. And1205CCand you1206PPyou can1207MDcan have1208VHhave a1209DTa disability1210NNdisability payment1211NNpayment that1212WDTthat comes1213VVZcome in1214INin the1215DTthe form1216NNform of1217INof judgment1218NNjudgment .1219SENT. He1220PPhe concedes1221VVZconcede that1222IN/thatthat workers1223NNSworker '1224POS' compensation1225NNcompensation is1226VBZbe covered1227VVNcover .1228SENT. The1229DTthe judgment1230NNjudgment or1231CCor back1232RBback pay1233VVpay award1234NNaward in1235INin Nierotko1236NPNierotko was1237VBDbe a1238DTa judgment1239NNjudgment based1240VVNbase on1241INon a1242DTa wrongful1243JJwrongful discharge1244NNdischarge by1245INby violation1246NNviolation of1247INof a1248DTa statute1249NNstatute .1250SENT. But1251CCbut there1252EXthere 's1253VBZbe just1254RBjust nothing1255NNnothing in1256INin the1257DTthe ...1258:... in1259INin the1260DTthe sense1261NNsense of1262INof the1263DTthe payment1264NNpayment that1265IN/thatthat it1266PPit says1267VVZsay it1268PPit has1269VHZhave to1270TOto be1271VBbe either1272RBeither from1273INfrom ...1274:... I1275PPI think1276VVPthink he1277PPhe concedes1278VVZconcede settlements1279NNSsettlement count1280VVcount .1281SENT. So1282RBso I1283PPI do1284VVPdo n't1285RBn't know1286VVknow why1287WRBwhy it1288PPit 's1289VBZbe different1290JJdifferent that1291IN/thatthat a1292DTa court1293NNcourt ordered1294VVDorder the1295DTthe payment1296NNpayment .1297SENT. I1298PPI mean1299VVPmean ,1300,, there1301EXthere 's1302VBZbe ...1303:... there1304EXthere 's1305VBZbe really1306RBreally no1307DTno basis1308NNbasis for1309INfor ...1310:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1311LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I1312PPI ...1313:... I1314PPI get1315VVPget that1316IN/thatthat there1317EXthere 's1318VBZbe a1319DTa tough1320JJtough line-drawing1321VVGline-draw problem1322NNproblem here1323RBhere ,1324,, and1325CCand I1326PPI have1327VHPhave some1328DTsome questions1329NNSquestion for1330INfor the1331DTthe other1332JJother side1333NNside on1334INon that1335DTthat ,1336,, but1337CCbut if1338INif you1339PPyou just1340RBjust in1341INin isolation1342NNisolation deal1343NNdeal with1344INwith the1345DTthe FELA1346NPFela judgment1347NNjudgment compared1348VVNcompare with1349INwith ,1350,, say1351VVsay ,1352,, sick1353JJsick and1354CCand vacation1355NNvacation time1356NNtime .1357SENT. [MS. BLATT]1358LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure1359NPSure .1360SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1361LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] What1362WPWhat about1363RBabout ...1364:... [MS. BLATT]1365LOC[MS. BLATT] I1366PPI think1367VVPthink maybe1368RBmaybe you1369PPyou 're1370VBPbe going1371VVGgo to1372TOto fault1373VVfault versus1374INversus a1375DTa no1376DTno fault1377NNfault scheme1378NNscheme ,1379,, and1380CCand nothing1381NNnothing in1382INin the1383DTthe statute1384NNstatute says1385VVZsay there1386EXthere has1387VHZhave to1388TOto be1389VBbe fault1390NNfault or1391CCor no1392DTno fault1393NNfault .1394SENT. It1395PPit 's1396VBZbe just1397RBjust like1398INlike worker1399NNworker 's1400POS's compensation1401NNcompensation is1402VBZbe ...1403:... he1404PPhe concedes1405VVZconcede is1406VBZbe payment1407NNpayment for1408INfor services1409NNSservice rendered1410VVNrender .1411SENT. You1412PPyou just1413RBjust do1414VVPdo n't1415RBn't have1416VHhave to1417TOto prove1418VVprove negligence1419NNnegligence .1420SENT. But1421CCbut if1422INif you1423PPyou ...1424:... suing1425VVGsue to1426TOto get1427VVget maternity1428NNmaternity leave1429NNleave ,1430,, you1431PPyou have1432VHPhave to1433TOto prove1434VVprove you1435PPyou 're1436VBPbe pregnant1437JJpregnant .1438SENT. If1439INif you1440PPyou 're1441VBPbe suing1442VVGsue to1443TOto get1444VVget disability1445NNdisability leave1446NNleave ,1447,, you1448PPyou have1449VHPhave to1450TOto prove1451VVprove that1452IN/thatthat you1453PPyou 're1454VBPbe disabled1455JJdisabled .1456SENT. If1457INif you1458PPyou 're1459VBPbe suing1460VVGsue for1461INfor workers1462NNSworker '1463POS' compensation1464NNcompensation ,1465,, you1466PPyou have1467VHPhave to1468TOto prove1469VVprove that1470IN/thatthat it1471PPit was1472VBDbe service-connected1473VVNservice-connect and1474CCand that1475DTthat ...1476:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1477LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Can1478MDcan ...1479:... [MS. BLATT]1480LOC[MS. BLATT] ...1481:... you1482PPyou had1483VHDhave injuries1484NNSinjury .1485SENT. I1486PPI think1487VVPthink what1488WPwhat you1489PPyou 're1490VBPbe saying1491VVGsay is1492VBZbe ,1493,, if1494INif you1495PPyou have1496VHPhave to1497TOto sue1498VVsue ,1499,, you1500PPyou can1501MDcan 't1502RB't be1503VBbe paid1504VVNpay for1505INfor services1506NNSservice rendered1507VVNrender ,1508,, but1509CCbut if1510INif the1511DTthe employer1512NNemployer pays1513VVZpay it1514PPit voluntarily1515RBvoluntarily ,1516,, that1517WDTthat definitely1518RBdefinitely is1519VBZbe atextual1520JJatextual .1521SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1522LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] As1523INas a1524DTa practical1525JJpractical matter1526NNmatter ,1527,, going1528VVGgo back1529RBback to1530TOto a1531DTa part1532NNpart of1533INof Justice1534NPJustice Gorsuch1535NPGorsuch 's1536POS's question1537NNquestion ,1538,, in1539INin most1540JJSmost state1541NNstate law1542NNlaw verdicts1543NNSverdict ,1544,, there1545EXthere is1546VBZbe just1547RBjust a1548DTa payment1549NNpayment .1550SENT. It1551PPit 's1552VBZbe a1553DTa general1554JJgeneral verdict1555NNverdict .1556SENT. How1557WRBHow are1558VBPbe you1559PPyou going1560VVGgo to1561TOto figure1562VVfigure out1563INout which1564WDTwhich part1565NNpart of1566INof the1567DTthe award1568NNaward is1569VBZbe subject1570JJsubject to1571TOto the1572DTthe deduction1573NNdeduction ?1574SENT? And1575CCand ...1576:... and1577CCand Justice1578NPJustice Gorsuch1579NPGorsuch mentioned1580VVDmention ...1581:... mentioned1582VVNmention a1583DTa negligence1584NNnegligence judgment1585NNjudgment .1586SENT. What1587WPWhat are1588VBPbe we1589PPwe going1590VVGgo to1591TOto do1592VVdo with1593INwith those1594DTthose ?1595SENT? Here1596RBhere ,1597,, that1598WDTthat 's1599VBZbe not1600RBnot at1601INat issue1602NNissue because1603INbecause there1604EXthere 's1605VHZhave been1606VBNbe a1607DTa concession1608NNconcession from1609INfrom the1610DTthe beginning1611NNbeginning that1612IN/thatthat this1613DTthis award1614NNaward had1615VHDhave to1616TOto do1617VVdo with1618INwith past1619JJpast pay1620NNpay and1621CCand medical1622JJmedical expenses1623NNSexpense .1624SENT. So1625RBso we1626PPwe know1627VVPknow the1628DTthe amounts1629NNSamount under1630INunder FELA1631NPFela ,1632,, but1633CCbut we1634PPwe may1635MDmay not1636RBnot know1637VVknow them1638PPthem in1639INin a1640DTa general1641JJgeneral verdict1642NNverdict .1643SENT. So1644RBso ...1645:... [MS. BLATT]1646LOC[MS. BLATT] Of1647INof course1648NNcourse .1649SENT. Let1650VVlet me1651PPme ...1652:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1653LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...1654:... does1655VVZdo his1656PP$his argument1657NNargument have1658VHPhave more1659JJRmore purchase1660NNpurchase in1661INin those1662DTthose situations1663NNSsituation ?1664SENT? [MS. BLATT]1665LOC[MS. BLATT] No1666NPNo ,1667,, because1668RBbecause ,1669,, under1670INunder the1671DTthe Railroad1672NPRailroad Retirement1673NPRetirement Act1674NPAct in1675INin Section1676NPSection 231h1677NP231h (1678(( 21679CD2 )1680)) ...1681:... this1682DTthis has1683VHZhave been1684VBNbe around1685RBaround since1686INsince 19461687CD@card@ ...1688:... there1689EXthere 's1690VBZbe a1691DTa presumption1692NNpresumption that1693IN/thatthat a1694DTa personal1695JJpersonal injury1696NNinjury award1697NNaward ,1698,, the1699DTthe entire1700JJentire amount1701NNamount ,1702,, is1703VBZbe treated1704VVNtreat for1705INfor lost1706JJlost time1707NNtime .1708SENT. And1709CCand let1710VVlet me1711PPme just1712RBjust point1713VVPpoint you1714PPyou to1715TOto the1716DTthe JA1717NPJa on1718INon 78a1719NP78a ,1720,, the1721DTthe Railroad1722NPRailroad Retirement1723NPRetirement Board1724NPBoard gives1725VVZgive you1726PPyou sort1727NNsort of1728INof the1729DTthe ...1730:... the1731DTthe current1732JJcurrent ...1733:... the1734DTthe way1735NNway they1736PPthey treat1737VVPtreat this1738DTthis .1739SENT. But1740CCbut let1741VVlet me1742PPme go1743VVgo back1744RBback to1745TOto the1746DTthe statute1747NNstatute .1748SENT. The1749DTthe statute1750NNstatute says1751VVZsay all1752DTall of1753INof it1754PPit counts1755VVZcount for1756INfor lost1757VVNlose time1758NNtime .1759SENT. However1760RBhowever ,1761,, the1762DTthe parties1763NNSparty can1764MDcan take1765VVtake out1766RPout any1767DTany amount1768NNamount that1769IN/thatthat they1770PPthey want1771VVPwant to1772TOto allocate1773VVallocate for1774INfor reasons1775NNSreason other1776JJother than1777INthan lost1778JJlost time1779NNtime .1780SENT. So1781INso the1782DTthe parties1783NNSparty are1784VBPbe free1785JJfree to1786TOto say1787VVsay whatever1788WDTwhatever they1789PPthey want1790VVPwant .1791SENT. They1792PPthey can1793MDcan say1794VVsay that1795DTthat $1796$$ 101797CD@card@ was1798VBDbe lost1799VVNlose time1800NNtime .1801SENT. They1802PPthey can1803MDcan say1804VVsay all1805DTall of1806INof it1807PPit was1808VBDbe lost1809VVNlose time1810NNtime .1811SENT. So1812RBso ,1813,, in1814INin a1815DTa general1816JJgeneral verdict1817NNverdict situation1818NNsituation ,1819,, you1820PPyou know1821VVPknow ,1822,, I1823PPI think1824VVPthink what1825WPwhat the1826DTthe RRB1827NPRRB would1828MDwould say1829VVsay is1830VBZbe we1831PPwe 're1832VBPbe going1833VVGgo to1834TOto count1835VVcount it1836PPit all1837DTall as1838RBas lost1839VVNlose time1840NNtime unless1841INunless there1842EXthere 's1843VBZbe an1844DTan allocation1845NNallocation made1846VVDmake .1847SENT. Now1848RBnow what1849WPwhat Respondent1850NNrespondent tries1851VVZtry to1852TOto say1853VVsay is1854VBZbe ,1855,, well1856RBwell ,1857,, somehow1858RBsomehow there1859EXthere are1860VBPbe some1861DTsome shenanigans1862NNSshenanigan going1863VVGgo on1864INon because1865INbecause ,1866,, you1867PPyou know1868VVPknow ,1869,, there1870EXthere might1871MDmight be1872VBbe a1873DTa reason1874NNreason to1875TOto attribute1876VVattribute it1877PPit less1878JJRless to1879TOto lost1880VVNlose time1881NNtime on1882INon the1883DTthe taxing1884VVGtax side1885NNside ,1886,, but1887CCbut let1888VVlet me1889PPme tell1890VVtell you1891PPyou what1892WPwhat 's1893VBZbe going1894VVGgo to1895TOto happen1896VVhappen if1897INif we1898PPwe lose1899VVPlose because1900INbecause of1901INof h1902NNh (1903(( 21904CD2 )1905)) .1906SENT. If1907INif we1908PPwe lose1909VVPlose ,1910,, a1911DTa employee1912NNemployee can1913MDcan take1914VVtake an1915DTan entire1916JJentire judgment1917NNjudgment ,1918,, no1919DTno matter1920NNmatter what1921WPwhat was1922VBDbe devoted1923VVNdevote to1924TOto lost1925VVNlose time1926NNtime ,1927,, and1928CCand get1929VVget full1930JJfull credit1931NNcredit and1932CCand pay1933VVpay zero1934CDzero tax1935NNtax .1936SENT. And1937CCand the1938DTthe incentive1939NNincentive will1940MDwill be1941VBbe ...1942:... there1943EXthere 's1944VBZbe just1945RBjust no1946DTno downside1947NNdownside to1948TOto doing1949VVGdo that1950DTthat .1951SENT. So1952RBso you1953PPyou would1954MDwould take1955VVtake all1956DTall of1957INof it1958PPit and1959CCand get1960VVget your1961PP$your credit1962NNcredit ,1963,, and1964CCand pay1965VVpay absolutely1966RBabsolutely no1967DTno taxes1968NNStaxis .1969SENT. And1970CCand that1971DTthat 's1972VBZbe just1973RBjust h1974NNh (1975(( 21976CD2 )1977)) .1978SENT. In1979INin the1980DTthe statute1981NNstatute ,1982,, there1983EXthere 's1984VBZbe the1985DTthe RRB1986NPRRB guidance1987NNguidance on1988INon it1989PPit .1990SENT. The1991DTthe SG1992NPSG 's1993POS's office1994NNoffice can1995MDcan ...1996:... can1997MDcan vouch1998VVvouch ,1999,, you2000PPyou know2001VVPknow ,2002,, confirm2003VVPconfirm all2004DTall this2005NNthis ,2006,, but2007CCbut that2008DTthat 's2009VBZbe just2010RBjust the2011DTthe way2012NNway this2013DTthis has2014VHZhave been2015VBNbe treated2016VVNtreat .2017SENT. Now2018RBnow ,2019,, in2020RBin ...2021:... the2022DTthe state2023NNstate cases2024NNScase that2025WDTthat have2026VHPhave addressed2027VVNaddress the2028DTthe issue2029NNissue have2030VHPhave said2031VVNsay that2032IN/thatthat we2033PPwe 'll2034MDwill use2035VVuse the2036DTthe same2037JJsame allocation2038NNallocation scheme2039NNscheme on2040INon the2041DTthe taxing2042VVGtax side2043NNside .2044SENT. So2045INso all2046DTall three2047CDthree at2048INat least2049JJSleast state2050NNstate supreme2051NNsupreme courts2052NNScourt who2053WPwho addressed2054VVDaddress it2055PPit have2056VHPhave decided2057VVNdecide that2058DTthat issue2059NNissue .2060SENT. And2061CCand ,2062,, Justice2063NPJustice Gorsuch2064NPGorsuch ,2065,, I2066PPI do2067VVPdo want2068VVwant to2069TOto say2070VVsay Nierotko2071NPNierotko involved2072VVDinvolve a2073DTa judgment2074NNjudgment ,2075,, although2076INalthough it2077PPit was2078VBDbe by2079INby the2080DTthe NLRB2081NPNLRB ,2082,, so2083RBso an2084DTan agency2085NNagency judgment2086NNjudgment .2087SENT. And2088CCand ,2089,, Justice2090NPJustice Kavanaugh2091NPKavanaugh ,2092,, let2093VVDlet me2094PPme just2095RBjust say2096VVPsay ,2097,, although2098INalthough I2099PPI think2100VVPthink there2101EXthere 's2102VBZbe these2103DTthese textual2104JJtextual and2105CCand the2106DTthe pragmatic2107JJpragmatic definition2108NNdefinition the2109DTthe Court2110NPCourt gave2111VVDgive ,2112,, I2113PPI do2114VVPdo think2115VVthink it2116PPit 's2117VBZbe worth2118JJworth just2119RBjust noting2120VVGnote the2121DTthe concurrence2122NNconcurrence of2123INof Justice2124NPJustice Frankfurter2125NNfrankfurter ,2126,, who2127WPwho said2128VVDsay sort2129NNsort of2130INof that2131DTthat ,2132,, you2133PPyou know2134VVPknow ,2135,, we2136PPwe 're2137VBPbe going2138VVGgo to2139TOto deem2140VVdeem employees2141NNSemployee to2142TOto be2143VBbe in2144INin the2145DTthe service2146NNservice of2147INof the2148DTthe employer2149NNemployer if2150INif they2151PPthey were2152VBDbe forced2153VVNforce into2154INinto idleness2155NNidleness because2156INbecause of2157INof the2158DTthe employer2159NNemployer 's2160POS's wrongdoing2161NNwrongdoing .2162SENT. I2163PPI mean2164VVPmean ,2165,, that2166WDTthat 's2167VBZbe just2168RBjust an2169DTan alternative2170JJalternative way2171NNway of2172INof looking2173VVGlook at2174INat it2175PPit .2176SENT. You2177PPyou do2178VVPdo n't2179RBn't have2180VHhave to2181TOto look2182VVlook at2183INat it2184PPit that2185WDTthat way2186NNway ,2187,, but2188CCbut ...2189:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]2190LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] If2191INif ...2192:... if2193INif you2194PPyou 're2195VBPbe right2196RBright about2197RBabout that2198DTthat theory2199NNtheory ,2200,, why2201WRBwhy would2202MDwould n't2203RBn't the2204DTthe pain2205NNpain and2206CCand suffering2207VVGsuffer component2208NNcomponent also2209RBalso count2210VVcount ?2211SENT? [MS. BLATT]2212LOC[MS. BLATT] Well2213UHWell ,2214,, because2215INbecause the2216DTthe pain2217NNpain and2218CCand suffering2219NNsuffering is2220VBZbe not2221RBnot payment2222NNpayment for2223INfor services2224NNSservice rendered2225VVNrender in2226INin the2227DTthe same2228JJsame way2229NNway a2230DTa lost2231VVNlose wage2232NNwage award2233NNaward is2234VBZbe .2235SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]2236LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well2237UHWell ,2238,, if2239INif I2240PPI understood2241VVDunderstand your2242PP$your theory2243NNtheory ,2244,, it2245PPit was2246VBDbe something2247NNsomething like2248INlike it2249PPit happened2250VVDhappen while2251INwhile he2252PPhe was2253VBDbe on2254INon the2255DTthe job2256NNjob ,2257,, and2258CCand ,2259,, therefore2260RBtherefore ,2261,, what2262WPwhat follows2263VVZfollow is2264VBZbe ...2265:... is2266VBZbe ...2267:... is2268VBZbe ...2269:... can2270MDcan be2271VBbe understood2272VVNunderstand as2273INas services2274NNSservice rendered2275VVNrender .2276SENT. [MS. BLATT]2277LOC[MS. BLATT] No2278NPNo .2279SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]2280LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] And2281CCand the2282DTthe pain2283NNpain and2284CCand suffering2285VVGsuffer as2286RBas well2287RBwell .2288SENT. It2289PPit 's2290VBZbe like2291JJlike ,2292,, well2293RBwell ,2294,, you2295PPyou were2296VBDbe injured2297VVNinjure on2298INon the2299DTthe job2300NNjob and2301CCand that2302DTthat 's2303VBZbe why2304WRBwhy you2305PPyou had2306VHDhave this2307DTthis pain2308NNpain and2309CCand suffering2310NNsuffering .2311SENT. [MS. BLATT]2312LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure2313NPSure .2314SENT. It2315PPit 's2316VBZbe not2317RBnot payment2318NNpayment for2319INfor services2320NNSservice rendered2321VVNrender in2322INin the2323DTthe same2324JJsame way2325NNway because2326INbecause the2327DTthe amount2328NNamount of2329INof lost2330VVNlose wages2331NNSwage is2332VBZbe directly2333RBdirectly tied2334VVNtie to2335TOto the2336DTthe salary2337NNsalary for2338INfor services2339NNSservice rendered2340VVNrender .2341SENT. And2342CCand the2343DTthe pain2344NNpain and2345CCand suffering2346NNsuffering amount2347NNamount has2348VHZhave nothing2349NNnothing to2350TOto do2351VVdo with2352INwith your2353PP$your salary2354NNsalary ,2355,, your2356PP$your employment2357NNemployment ,2358,, or2359CCor anything2360NNanything else2361RBelse about2362INabout the2363DTthe employment2364NNemployment relationship2365NNrelationship .2366SENT. Plus2367RBplus ,2368,, there2369EXthere 's2370VBZbe a2371DTa strong2372JJstrong textual2373JJtextual argument2374NNargument .2375SENT. You2376PPyou do2377VVPdo n't2378RBn't have2379VHhave to2380TOto take2381VVtake my2382PP$my analysis2383NNanalysis .2384SENT. Congress2385NPCongress has2386VHZhave already2387RBalready distinguished2388VVNdistinguish between2389INbetween lost2390JJlost time2391NNtime pay2392NNpay and2393CCand other2394JJother factors2395NNSfactor associated2396VVNassociate with2397INwith a2398DTa personal2399JJpersonal injury2400NNinjury award2401NNaward .2402SENT. So2403RBso Congress2404NPCongress has2405VHZhave said2406VVNsay the2407DTthe parties2408NNSparty are2409VBPbe free2410JJfree to2411TOto only2412RBonly count2413VVcount as2414INas a2415DTa personal2416JJpersonal injury2417NNinjury award2418NNaward just2419RBjust the2420DTthe lost2421VVNlose wages2422NNSwage .2423SENT. So2424INso Congress2425NPCongress was2426VBDbe debating2427VVGdebate this2428DTthis back2429NNback in2430INin 19462431CD@card@ ,2432,, all2433PDTall these2434DTthese issues2435NNSissue about2436INabout what2437WPwhat to2438TOto do2439VVdo with2440INwith things2441NNSthing that2442WDTthat were2443VBDbe associated2444VVNassociate with2445INwith other2446JJother lost2447JJlost time2448NNtime ,2449,, and2450CCand they2451PPthey settled2452VVDsettle on2453INon this2454DTthis we2455PPwe 're2456VBPbe going2457VVGgo to2458TOto presume2459VVpresume it2460PPit 's2461VBZbe all2462RBall counted2463VVNcount ,2464,, but2465CCbut we2466PPwe 'll2467MDwill let2468VVlet you2469PPyou take2470VVtake out2471RPout anything2472NNanything that2473WDTthat 's2474VBZbe not2475RBnot related2476VVNrelate to2477TOto lost2478VVNlose wages2479NNSwage .2480SENT. So2481RBso ...2482:... a2483DTa question2484NNquestion ?2485SENT? [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2486LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] The2487DTthe court2488NNcourt ...2489:... court2490NNcourt of2491INof appeals2492NNSappeal relied2493VVNrely heavily2494RBheavily on2495INon the2496DTthe fact2497NNfact that2498IN/thatthat Congress2499NPCongress in2500RBin '2501POS' 752502CD@card@ and2503NPand '2504POS' 832505CD@card@ took2506VVDtake out2507RPout the2508DTthe reference2509NNreference to2510TOto payment2511NNpayment for2512INfor time2513NNtime lost2514VVDlose .2515SENT. [MS. BLATT]2516LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure2517NPSure .2518SENT. So2519RBso ,2520,, I2521PPI mean2522VVPmean ,2523,, let2524VVPlet 's2525POS's start2526NNstart again2527RBagain with2528INwith ...2529:... with2530INwith first2531JJfirst principles2532NNSprinciple .2533SENT. Under2534INunder that2535DTthat view2536NNview ,2537,, that2538WDTthat takes2539VVZtake out2540RPout ,2541,, I2542PPI mean2543VVPmean ,2544,, everything2545NNeverything ,2546,, the2547DTthe vacation2548NNvacation ,2549,, the2550DTthe holiday2551NNholiday ,2552,, everything2553NNeverything .2554SENT. So2555RBso that2556DTthat 's2557VBZbe fine2558JJfine .2559SENT. And2560CCand I2561PPI think2562VVPthink that2563IN/thatthat Respondent2564NNrespondent does2565VVZdo n't2566RBn't ...2567:... concedes2568VVZconcede that2569IN/thatthat away2570RBaway and2571CCand does2572VVZdo n't2573RBn't defend2574VVdefend it2575PPit for2576INfor good2577JJgood reason2578NNreason .2579SENT. And2580CCand that2581DTthat 's2582VBZbe because2583INbecause the2584DTthe ...2585:... the2586DTthe rule2587NNrule against2588INagainst superfluity2589NNsuperfluity has2590VHZhave the2591DTthe provisions2592NNSprovision in2593INin (2594(( e2595LSe )2596)) (2597(( 12598LS1 )2599)) and2600CCand (2601(( e2602LSe )2603)) (2604(( 42605LS4 )2606)) that2607WDTthat are2608VBPbe time2609NNtime lost2610VVDlose payments2611NNSpayment for2612INfor worker2613NNworker 's2614POS's compensation2615NNcompensation ,2616,, sickness2617NNsickness ,2618,, and2619CCand disability2620NNdisability .2621SENT. And2622CCand those2623DTthose exceptions2624NNSexception would2625MDwould n't2626RBn't be2627VBbe in2628INin there2629RBthere unless2630INunless they2631PPthey were2632VBDbe otherwise2633RBotherwise included2634VVNinclude within2635INwithin the2636DTthe operative2637JJoperative definition2638NNdefinition .2639SENT. But2640CCbut ,2641,, Justice2642NPJustice Kavanaugh2643NPKavanaugh ,2644,, let2645VVNlet 's2646POS's look2647NNlook at2648INat the2649DTthe timing2650NNtiming ,2651,, and2652CCand I2653PPI think2654VVPthink that2655IN/thatthat this2656DTthis is2657VBZbe pretty2658RBpretty dispositive2659JJdispositive as2660INas well2661RBwell .2662SENT. Congress2663NPCongress added2664VVDadd the2665DTthe sickness2666NNsickness ,2667,, worker2668NNworker 's2669POS's compensation2670NNcompensation ,2671,, and2672CCand disability2673NNdisability payments2674NNSpayment in2675INin 19772676CD@card@ and2677CCand then2678RBthen amended2679VVDamend them2680PPthem in2681INin 19812682CD@card@ .2683SENT. So2684RBso that2685DTthat was2686VBDbe after2687INafter Congress2688NPCongress took2689VVDtake out2690RPout the2691DTthe including2692VVGinclude remuneration2693NNremuneration paid2694VVNpay for2695INfor services2696NNSservice rendered2697VVNrender in2698INin '2699''' 752700CD@card@ .2701SENT. And2702CCand then2703RBthen when2704WRBwhen Congress2705NPCongress took2706VVDtake out2707RPout in2708INin ...2709:... I2710PPI 'm2711VBPbe sorry2712JJsorry ,2713,, in2714INin '2715POS' 752716CD@card@ ,2717,, when2718WRBwhen Congress2719NPCongress took2720VVDtake out2721RPout the2722DTthe phrase2723NNphrase ,2724,, then2725RBthen they2726PPthey added2727VVDadd the2728DTthe exceptions2729NNSexception later2730RBRlater ,2731,, they2732PPthey also2733RBalso left2734VVDleave in2735INin seven2736CDseven references2737NNSreference to2738TOto time2739VVtime lost2740JJlost and2741CCand personal2742JJpersonal injury2743NNinjury in2744INin (2745(( e2746LSe )2747)) (2748(( 22749LS2 )2750)) .2751SENT. So2752RBso we2753PPwe know2754VVPknow that2755IN/thatthat Congress2756NPCongress continued2757VVDcontinue to2758TOto think2759VVthink that2760DTthat time2761NNtime lost2762VVDlose payments2763NNSpayment were2764VBDbe covered2765VVNcover .2766SENT. Now2767RBnow comes2768VVZcome 19832769CD@card@ and2770CCand Congress2771NPCongress takes2772VVZtake out2773INout (2774(( e2775LSe )2776)) (2777(( 22778LS2 )2779)) ,2780,, but2781CCbut it2782PPit did2783VVDdo n't2784RBn't change2785VVchange the2786DTthe operative2787JJoperative definition2788NNdefinition in2789INin (2790(( e2791LSe )2792)) (2793(( 12794LS1 )2795)) ,2796,, and2797CCand it2798PPit left2799VVDleave in2800INin all2801PDTall the2802DTthe exceptions2803NNSexception for2804INfor worker2805NNworker 's2806POS's compensation2807NNcompensation ,2808,, sickness2809NNsickness and2810CCand disability2811NNdisability ,2812,, that2813WDTthat presupposed2814VVDpresuppose time2815NNtime lost2816VVNlose is2817VBZbe covered2818VVNcover .2819SENT. So2820RBso I2821PPI do2822VVPdo think2823VVthink that2824WDTthat ,2825,, you2826PPyou know2827VVPknow ,2828,, the2829DTthe including2830VVGinclude remuneration2831NNremuneration paid2832VVNpay for2833INfor time2834NNtime ...2835:... time2836NNtime lost2837VVDlose ,2838,, you2839PPyou know2840VVPknow ,2841,, is2842VBZbe fairly2843RBfairly read2844VVNread as2845INas an2846DTan illustrative2847JJillustrative example2848NNexample of2849INof the2850DTthe broader2851JJRbroad definition2852NNdefinition .2853SENT. I2854PPI 'm2855VBPbe going2856VVGgo to2857TOto briefly2858RBbriefly go2859VVgo over2860INover the2861DTthe 1042862CD@card@ argument2863NNargument if2864INif I2865PPI could2866MDcould .2867SENT. Just2868RBjust putting2869VVGput ...2870:... this2871DTthis is2872VBZbe the2873DTthe argument2874NNargument that2875IN/thatthat Respondent2876NNrespondent makes2877VVZmake as2878INas a2879DTa backup2880NNbackup that2881IN/thatthat ,2882,, because2883INbecause personal2884JJpersonal injury2885NNinjury awards2886NNSaward are2887VBPbe excluded2888VVNexclude from2889INfrom gross2890JJgross income2891NNincome under2892INunder 1042893CD@card@ ,2894,, and2895CCand an2896DTan employee2897NNemployee is2898VBZbe taxed2899VVNtax on2900INon his2901PP$his or2902CCor her2903PP$her income2904NNincome ,2905,, you2906PPyou should2907MDshould take2908VVtake out2909RPout gross2910JJgross income2911NNincome .2912SENT. And2913CCand I2914PPI 'm2915VBPbe not2916RBnot going2917VVGgo to2918TOto be2919VBbe able2920JJable to2921TOto explain2922VVexplain it2923PPit past2924JJpast that2925IN/thatthat point2926NNpoint ,2927,, but2928CCbut that2929DTthat 's2930VBZbe the2931DTthe beginning2932NNbeginning of2933INof his2934PP$his argument2935NNargument .2936SENT. The2937DTthe problem2938NNproblem with2939INwith it2940PPit is2941VBZbe ,2942,, first2943JJfirst of2944INof all2945DTall ,2946,, 32012947CD@card@ ,2948,, the2949DTthe tax2950NNtax ...2951:... the2952DTthe statute2953NNstatute that2954IN/thatthat taxes2955NNStaxis on2956INon income2957NNincome does2958VVZdo not2959RBnot use2960VVuse the2961DTthe word2962NNword gross2963JJgross income2964NNincome .2965SENT. It2966PPit just2967RBjust says2968VVZsay income2969NNincome .2970SENT. And2971CCand no2972DTno matter2973NNmatter what2974WPwhat word2975VVPword it2976PPit used2977VVDuse ,2978,, we2979PPwe think2980VVPthink it2981PPit just2982RBjust describes2983VVZdescribe the2984DTthe source2985NNsource of2986INof the2987DTthe tax2988NNtax .2989SENT. And2990CCand if2991INif you2992PPyou just2993RBjust look2994VVPlook at2995INat the2996DTthe language2997NNlanguage ,2998,, the2999DTthe employee3000NNemployee 's3001POS's income3002NNincome has3003VHZhave no3004DTno bearing3005NNbearing on3006INon either3007CCeither the3008DTthe tax3009NNtax base3010NNbase or3011CCor the3012DTthe amount3013NNamount of3014INof tax3015NNtax owed3016VVNowe .3017SENT. It3018PPit 's3019VBZbe just3020RBjust describing3021VVGdescribe the3022DTthe source3023NNsource .3024SENT. And3025CCand that3026DTthat tax3027NNtax base3028NNbase is3029VBZbe identically3030RBidentically defined3031VVNdefine for3032INfor the3033DTthe employer3034NNemployer in3035INin Section3036NPSection 32213037CD@card@ ,3038,, so3039RBso as3040INas a3041DTa textual3042JJtextual matter3043NNmatter ,3044,, it3045PPit can3046MDcan 't3047RB't be3048VBbe different3049JJdifferent .3050SENT. And3051CCand ,3052,, finally3053RBfinally ,3054,, Congress3055NPCongress incorporated3056VVDincorporate nine3057CDnine express3058JJexpress exclusions3059NNSexclusion from3060INfrom gross3061JJgross income3062NNincome into3063INinto the3064DTthe definition3065NNdefinition of3066INof compensation3067NNcompensation ,3068,, showing3069VVGshow Congress3070NPCongress knew3071VVDknow how3072WRBhow to3073TOto incorporate3074VVincorporate gross3075JJgross exclusions3076NNSexclusion when3077WRBwhen they3078PPthey wanted3079VVDwant to3080TOto ,3081,, and3082CCand Section3083NPSection 1043084CD@card@ is3085VBZbe not3086RBnot one3087CDone of3088INof them3089PPthem .3090SENT. And3091CCand if3092INif I3093PPI could3094MDcould reserve3095VVreserve the3096DTthe remainder3097NNremainder of3098INof my3099PP$my time3100NNtime .3101SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3102LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank3103VVthank you3104PPyou ,3105,, counsel3106NNcounsel .3107SENT. Ms3108NNMs .3109SENT. Kovner3110NPKovner .3111SENT.

[MS. KOVNER]3112LOC[MS. KOVNER] Mr3113NPMr .3114SENT. Chief3115NPChief Justice3116NPJustice ,3117,, and3118CCand may3119MDmay it3120PPit please3121VVplease the3122DTthe Court3123NPCourt :3124:: As3125INas Respondent3126NNrespondent now3127RBnow concedes3128VVZconcede ,3129,, the3130DTthe Eighth3131JJeighth Circuit3132NNcircuit misconstrued3133VVDmisconstrue the3134DTthe RRTA3135NPRRTA when3136WRBwhen it3137PPit held3138VVDhold that3139IN/thatthat compensation3140NNcompensation includes3141VVZinclude only3142JJonly payments3143NNSpayment for3144INfor hours3145NNShour when3146WRBwhen the3147DTthe employee3148NNemployee is3149VBZbe an3150DTan active3151JJactive server3152NNserver to3153TOto the3154DTthe employer3155NNemployer ,3156,, a3157DTa holding3158NNholding that3159WDTthat would3160MDwould exclude3161VVexclude sick3162JJsick leave3163NNleave ,3164,, vacation3165NNvacation pay3166NNpay ,3167,, and3168CCand severance3169NNseverance .3170SENT. There3171EXthere are3172VBPbe three3173CDthree main3174JJmain sources3175NNSsource that3176IN/thatthat each3177DTeach establish3178VVestablish that3179IN/thatthat ,3180,, instead3181RBinstead ,3182,, compensation3183NNcompensation includes3184VVZinclude employer3185NNemployer payments3186NNSpayment for3187INfor hours3188NNShour when3189WRBwhen an3190DTan employee3191NNemployee is3192VBZbe absent3193JJabsent from3194INfrom active3195JJactive service3196NNservice ,3197,, including3198VVGinclude time3199NNtime lost3200VVDlose .3201SENT. Starting3202VVGstart with3203INwith text3204NNtext ,3205,, the3206DTthe RRTA3207NPRRTA contains3208VVZcontain limited3209JJlimited exclusions3210NNSexclusion for3211INfor worker3212NNworker 's3213POS's compensation3214NNcompensation benefits3215NNSbenefit and3216CCand for3217INfor certain3218JJcertain types3219NNStype of3220INof sickness3221NNsickness and3222CCand disability3223NNdisability benefits3224NNSbenefit .3225SENT. Those3226DTthose exclusions3227NNSexclusion would3228MDwould be3229VBbe superfluous3230JJsuperfluous if3231INif the3232DTthe term3233NNterm "3234``" compensation3235NNcompensation "3236''" only3237RBonly reached3238VVNreach payments3239NNSpayment for3240INfor periods3241NNSperiod of3242INof active3243JJactive service3244NNservice .3245SENT. As3246RBas to3247TOto precedent3248NNprecedent ,3249,, since3250INsince 19463251CD@card@ ,3252,, this3253DTthis Court3254NPCourt has3255VHZhave construed3256VVNconstrue parallel3257JJparallel language3258NNlanguage in3259INin the3260DTthe Social3261NPSocial Security3262NPSecurity Act3263NPAct to3264TOto reach3265VVreach all3266DTall payments3267NNSpayment arising3268VVGarise out3269RPout of3270INof the3271DTthe employer3272NNemployer /3273SYM/ employee3274NNemployee relationship3275NNrelationship ,3276,, including3277VVGinclude time3278NNtime lost3279VVDlose .3280SENT. And3281CCand ,3282,, Justice3283NPJustice Kavanaugh3284NPKavanaugh ,3285,, to3286TOto your3287PP$your question3288NNquestion about3289RBabout whether3290INwhether that3291DTthat continues3292VVZcontinue to3293TOto be3294VBbe good3295JJgood law3296NNlaw ,3297,, this3298DTthis Court3299NPCourt reaffirmed3300VVDreaffirm that3301DTthat precedent3302NNprecedent .3303SENT. It3304PPit applied3305VVDapply it3306PPit in3307INin Quality3308NPQuality Stores3309NPSStores just3310RBjust in3311INin 20143312CD@card@ .3313SENT. And3314CCand those3315DTthose decisions3316NNSdecision support3317VVPsupport also3318RBalso construing3319VVGconstrue the3320DTthe RRTA3321NPRRTA to3322TOto reach3323VVreach time3324NNtime lost3325VVNlose .3326SENT. And3327CCand ,3328,, third3329JJthird ,3330,, this3331DTthis interpretation3332NNinterpretation appropriately3333RBappropriately reflects3334VVZreflect the3335DTthe interlocking3336VVGinterlock structure3337NNstructure of3338INof the3339DTthe RRTA3340NPRRTA and3341CCand the3342DTthe parallel3343JJparallel benefits3344NNSbenefit statute3345NNstatute known3346VVNknow as3347INas the3348DTthe RRA3349NPRRA .3350SENT. Time3351NNtime lost3352VVDlose payments3353NNSpayment count3354VVcount as3355INas compensation3356NNcompensation under3357INunder the3358DTthe RRA3359NPRRA ,3360,, and3361CCand are3362VBPbe credited3363VVNcredit towards3364INtowards an3365DTan employee3366NNemployee 's3367POS's retirement3368NNretirement benefits3369NNSbenefit .3370SENT. Interpreting3371VVGinterpret the3372DTthe RRTA3373NPRRTA 's3374POS's definition3375NNdefinition to3376TOto cover3377VVcover those3378DTthose payments3379NNSpayment creates3380VVZcreate symmetry3381NNsymmetry between3382INbetween interrelated3383VVNinterrelate tax3384NNtax and3385CCand benefit3386NNbenefit provisions3387NNSprovision .3388SENT. And3389CCand if3390INif I3391PPI could3392MDcould start3393VVstart by3394INby just3395RBjust turning3396VVGturn to3397TOto Justice3398NPJustice Gorsuch3399NPGorsuch 's3400POS's question3401NNquestion about3402INabout why3403WRBwhy it3404PPit 's3405VBZbe not3406RBnot different3407JJdifferent ,3408,, that3409IN/thatthat this3410DTthis payment3411NNpayment is3412VBZbe essentially3413RBessentially a3414DTa statutorily-mandated3415JJstatutorily-mandated payment3416NNpayment that3417IN/thatthat results3418NNSresult from3419INfrom a3420DTa judgment3421NNjudgment at3422INat the3423DTthe end3424NNend of3425INof the3426DTthe day3427NNday .3428SENT. We3429PPwe think3430VVPthink there3431EXthere are3432VBPbe two3433CDtwo main3434JJmain sources3435NNSsource that3436WDTthat show3437VVPshow that3438IN/thatthat the3439DTthe fact3440NNfact that3441IN/thatthat it3442PPit 's3443VBZbe a3444DTa legal3445JJlegal obligation3446NNobligation does3447VVZdo n't3448RBn't make3449VVmake a3450DTa difference3451NNdifference .3452SENT. The3453DTthe first3454JJfirst is3455VBZbe in3456INin the3457DTthe statutory3458JJstatutory text3459NNtext ,3460,, the3461DTthe worker3462NNworker 's3463POS's compensation3464NNcompensation carveout3465NNcarveout is3466VBZbe really3467RBreally appropriate3468JJappropriate ...3469:... is3470VBZbe really3471RBreally important3472JJimportant ,3473,, because3474INbecause it3475PPit shows3476VVZshow that3477IN/thatthat it3478PPit can3479MDcan be3480VBbe ...3481:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]3482LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] That3483DTthat 's3484VBZbe where3485WRBwhere I3486PPI get3487VVPget stuck3488VVNstick too3489RBtoo .3490SENT. I3491PPI 've3492VHPhave got3493VVNget some3494DTsome questions3495NNSquestion about3496INabout that3497DTthat for3498INfor your3499PP$your friend3500NNfriend on3501INon the3502DTthe other3503JJother side3504NNside .3505SENT. What3506WPWhat 's3507VBZbe your3508PP$your other3509JJother one3510CDone ?3511SENT? [MS. KOVNER]3512LOC[MS. KOVNER] The3513DTthe other3514JJother one3515CDone is3516VBZbe Nierotko3517NPNierotko ,3518,, which3519WDTwhich also3520RBalso involves3521VVZinvolve essentially3522RBessentially a3523DTa judgment3524NNjudgment .3525SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3526LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Could3527MDcould you3528PPyou tell3529VVtell me3530PPme what3531WPwhat ...3532:... what3533WPwhat we3534PPwe should3535MDshould make3536VVmake of3537INof the3538DTthe fact3539NNfact that3540IN/thatthat the3541DTthe IRS3542NPIRS does3543VVZdo n't3544RBn't appear3545VVappear ...3546:... you3547PPyou might3548MDmight correct3549VVcorrect me3550PPme ...3551:... since3552INsince 19803553CD@card@ at3554INat least3555JJSleast ,3556,, to3557TOto bring3558VVbring enforcement3559NNenforcement actions3560NNSaction to3561TOto assess3562VVassess penalties3563NNSpenalty or3564CCor back-taxes3565NNSback-taxes to3566TOto a3567DTa railroad3568NNrailroad employee3569NNemployee who3570WPwho has3571VHZhave ...3572:... who3573WPwho did3574VVDdo not3575RBnot withhold3576VVwithhold a3577DTa portion3578NNportion of3579INof the3580DTthe FELA3581NPFela judgment3582NNjudgment ?3583SENT? [MS. KOVNER]3584LOC[MS. KOVNER] So3585INso we3586PPwe do3587VVPdo n't3588RBn't think3589VVthink that3590WDTthat 's3591VBZbe exactly3592RBexactly correct3593JJcorrect ,3594,, Justice3595NPJustice Sotomayor3596NPSotomayor .3597SENT. So3598RBso I3599PPI think3600VVPthink ,3601,, to3602TOto understand3603VVunderstand the3604DTthe IRS3605NPIRS 's3606POS's position3607NNposition ,3608,, the3609DTthe most3610RBSmost relevant3611JJrelevant indicators3612NNSindicator are3613VBPbe ,3614,, first3615RBfirst ,3616,, the3617DTthe regulations3618NNSregulation ,3619,, which3620WDTwhich have3621VHPhave continuously3622RBcontinuously said3623VVNsay ,3624,, you3625PPyou know3626VVPknow ,3627,, time3628NNtime lost3629VVDlose payments3630NNSpayment are3631VBPbe covered3632VVNcover ,3633,, since3634INsince 19373635CD@card@ ,3636,, and3637CCand continues3638VVZcontinue to3639TOto the3640DTthe present3641NNpresent .3642SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3643LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] You3644PPyou said3645VVDsay it3646PPit ,3647,, but3648CCbut you3649PPyou have3650VHPhave n't3651RBn't appeared3652VVNappear to3653TOto do3654VVdo much3655RBmuch about3656INabout it3657PPit .3658SENT. [MS. KOVNER]3659LOC[MS. KOVNER] So3660INso I3661PPI do3662VVPdo n't3663RBn't think3664VVthink that3665WDTthat 's3666VBZbe the3667DTthe case3668NNcase .3669SENT. I3670PPI mean3671VVPmean ,3672,, whenever3673WRBwhenever we3674PPwe 've3675VHPhave been3676VBNbe asked3677VVNask ,3678,, there3679EXthere 's3680VBZbe a3681DTa Technical3682NPTechnical Advice3683NPAdvice Memorandum3684NPMemorandum from3685INfrom 19803686CD@card@ dealing3687VVGdeal specifically3688RBspecifically with3689INwith FELA3690NPFela judgments3691NNSjudgment saying3692VVGsay ,3693,, again3694RBagain ,3695,, they3696PPthey have3697VHPhave to3698TOto be3699VBbe paid3700VVNpay .3701SENT. I3702PPI think3703VVPthink the3704DTthe difficulty3705NNdifficulty that3706WDTthat may3707MDmay arise3708VVarise is3709VBZbe these3710DTthese are3711VBPbe suits3712NNSsuit that3713WDTthat occur3714VVPoccur between3715INbetween not3716RBnot the3717DTthe IRS3718NPIRS but3719CCbut between3720INbetween a3721DTa railroad3722NNrailroad employee3723NNemployee and3724CCand an3725DTan employer3726NNemployer .3727SENT. And3728CCand I3729PPI think3730VVPthink what3731WPwhat the3732DTthe affidavit3733NNaffidavit on3734INon the3735DTthe other3736JJother side3737NNside is3738VBZbe asserting3739VVGassert is3740VBZbe that3741IN/thatthat railroads3742NNSrailroad may3743MDmay essentially3744RBessentially not3745RBnot have3746VHPhave been3747VBNbe complying3748VVGcomply in3749INin some3750DTsome cases3751NNScase ,3752,, I3753PPI do3754VVPdo n't3755RBn't know3756VVknow how3757WRBhow many3758JJmany cases3759NNScase ,3760,, with3761INwith the3762DTthe IRS3763NPIRS 's3764POS's regulations3765NNSregulation .3766SENT. And3767CCand if3768INif that3769DTthat ...3770:... if3771INif that3772WDTthat has3773VHZhave happened3774VVNhappen ,3775,, it3776PPit 's3777VBZbe contrary3778JJcontrary to3779TOto our3780PP$our regulations3781NNSregulation .3782SENT. It3783PPit 's3784VBZbe not3785RBnot something3786NNsomething we3787PPwe 've3788VHPhave necessarily3789RBnecessarily known3790VVNknow about3791RBabout because3792INbecause it3793PPit 's3794VBZbe a3795DTa suit3796NNsuit between3797INbetween a3798DTa taxpayer3799NNtaxpayer and3800CCand a3801DTa railroad3802NNrailroad ,3803,, and3804CCand if3805INif neither3806CCneither of3807INof them3808PPthem reports3809VVZreport it3810PPit ,3811,, it3812PPit may3813MDmay be3814VBbe that3815IN/thatthat there3816EXthere are3817VBPbe cases3818NNScase where3819WRBwhere ,3820,, you3821PPyou know3822VVPknow ,3823,, the3824DTthe IRS3825NPIRS has3826VHZhave n't3827RBn't been3828VBNbe aware3829JJaware of3830INof ,3831,, has3832VHZhave n't3833RBn't gone3834VVNgo after3835INafter that3836DTthat money3837NNmoney .3838SENT. But3839CCbut the3840DTthe IRS3841NPIRS ...3842:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]3843LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] The3844NPThe ...3845:... the3846DTthe ...3847:... the3848DTthe railroad3849NNrailroad pays3850VVZpay ...3851:... pays3852VVZpay the3853DTthe full3854JJfull tax3855NNtax but3856CCbut charges3857VVZcharge the3858DTthe ...3859:... the3860DTthe railroad3861NNrailroad worker3862NNworker for3863INfor his3864PP$his or3865CCor her3866PP$her share3867NNshare ?3868SENT? Is3869VBZbe that3870IN/thatthat how3871WRBhow it3872PPit works3873VVZwork ?3874SENT? [MS. KOVNER]3875LOC[MS. KOVNER] That3876DTthat 's3877VBZbe right3878JJright .3879SENT. The3880DTthe IRS3881NPIRS ...3882:... the3883DTthe railroad3884NNrailroad is3885VBZbe required3886VVNrequire to3887TOto withhold3888VVwithhold both3889DTboth ...3890:... to3891TOto withhold3892VVwithhold from3893INfrom the3894DTthe employee3895NNemployee 's3896POS's pay3897NNpay the3898DTthe employee3899NNemployee 's3900POS's share3901NNshare ,3902,, and3903CCand then3904RBthen it3905PPit pays3906VVZpay both3907DTboth shares3908NNSshare .3909SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]3910LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I3911PPI would3912MDwould be3913VBbe curious3914JJcurious ,3915,, your3916PP$your answer3917NNanswer to3918TOto Justice3919NPJustice Sotomayor3920NPSotomayor and3921CCand Justice3922NPJustice Kagan3923NPKagan 's3924POS's questions3925NNSquestion earlier3926RBRearlier .3927SENT. So3928RBso what3929WPwhat do3930VVPdo we3931PPwe do3932VVPdo about3933INabout a3934DTa general3935JJgeneral verdict3936NNverdict where3937WRBwhere there3938EXthere 's3939VBZbe no3940DTno allocation3941NNallocation between3942INbetween what3943WPwhat might3944MDmight be3945VBbe later3946RBRlater thought3947VVNthink by3948INby some3949DTsome to3950TOto be3951VBbe compensation3952NNcompensation for3953INfor lost3954JJlost services3955NNSservice and3956CCand other3957JJother ...3958:... other3959JJother things3960NNSthing ?3961SENT? What3962WPWhat do3963VVPdo we3964PPwe do3965VVPdo about3966INabout pain3967NNpain and3968CCand suffering3969NNsuffering ,3970,, which3971WDTwhich might3972MDmight be3973VBbe classified3974VVNclassify as3975INas compensation3976NNcompensation for3977INfor lost3978VVNlose time3979NNtime as3980INas well3981RBwell ?3982SENT? What3983WPWhat 's3984VBZbe the3985DTthe government3986NNgovernment 's3987POS's view3988NNview on3989INon those3990DTthose complications3991NNScomplication ?3992SENT? [MS. KOVNER]3993LOC[MS. KOVNER] Yeah3994NPYeah .3995SENT. So3996RBso ,3997,, I3998PPI mean3999VVPmean ,4000,, taking4001VVGtake the4002DTthe ...4003:... the4004DTthe first4005JJfirst question4006NNquestion first4007RBfirst ,4008,, the4009DTthe what4010WPwhat if4011INif there4012EXthere 's4013VBZbe no4014DTno allocation4015NNallocation ,4016,, I4017PPI ...4018:... I4019PPI agree4020VVPagree with4021INwith the4022DTthe articulation4023NNarticulation by4024INby my4025PP$my friend4026NNfriend on4027INon the4028DTthe railroad4029NNrailroad side4030NNside that4031IN/thatthat if4032INif there4033EXthere 's4034VBZbe no4035DTno allocation4036NNallocation at4037INat all4038DTall ...4039:... and4040CCand there4041EXthere 's4042VBZbe some4043DTsome material4044NNmaterial that4045WDTthat is4046VBZbe in4047INin the4048DTthe JA4049NPJa ,4050,, there4051EXthere 's4052VBZbe sort4053NNsort of4054INof detailed4055JJdetailed guidance4056NNguidance on4057INon allocation4058NNallocation from4059INfrom the4060DTthe RRB4061NPRRB ...4062:... but4063CCbut I4064PPI think4065VVPthink if4066INif there4067EXthere is4068VBZbe no4069DTno allocation4070NNallocation ,4071,, the4072DTthe presumption4073NNpresumption is4074VBZbe it4075PPit 's4076VBZbe going4077VVGgo to4078TOto be4079VBbe treated4080VVNtreat as4081INas time4082NNtime lost4083VVDlose .4084SENT. I4085PPI think4086VVPthink the4087DTthe RRB4088NPRRB says4089VVZsay ,4090,, nonetheless4091RBnonetheless ,4092,, the4093DTthe employer4094NNemployer and4095CCand the4096DTthe employee4097NNemployee are4098VBPbe allowed4099VVNallow to4100TOto come4101VVcome in4102INin even4103RBeven after4104INafter the4105DTthe judgment4106NNjudgment and4107CCand allocate4108VVallocate it4109PPit between4110INbetween time4111NNtime lost4112VVDlose and4113CCand ...4114:... and4115CCand other4116JJother sources4117NNSsource .4118SENT. And4119CCand we4120PPwe think4121VVPthink ,4122,, you4123PPyou know4124VVPknow ,4125,, that4126WDTthat 's4127VBZbe ...4128:... that4129WDTthat 's4130VBZbe what's4131JJwhat's ...4132:... h4133NNh (4134(( 24135CD2 )4136)) ,4137,, which4138WDTwhich is4139VBZbe still4140RBstill in4141INin the4142DTthe RRA4143NPRRA ,4144,, suggests4145VVZsuggest is4146VBZbe the4147DTthe appropriate4148JJappropriate way4149NNway to4150TOto handle4151VVhandle this4152DTthis .4153SENT. And4154CCand I4155PPI think4156VVPthink h4157NNh (4158(( 24159CD2 )4160)) is4161VBZbe also4162RBalso the4163DTthe part4164NNpart of4165INof the4166DTthe answer4167NNanswer on4168INon pain4169NNpain and4170CCand suffering4171NNsuffering .4172SENT. h4173NNh (4174(( 24175CD2 )4176)) clearly4177RBclearly contemplates4178VVZcontemplate that4179IN/thatthat when4180WRBwhen you4181PPyou have4182VHPhave a4183DTa judgment4184NNjudgment ,4185,, it4186PPit 's4187VBZbe going4188VVGgo to4189TOto contain4190VVcontain in4191INin part4192NNpart taxable4193JJtaxable payments4194NNSpayment for4195INfor time4196NNtime lost4197VVNlose and4198CCand also4199RBalso other4200JJother kinds4201NNSkind of4202INof damages4203NNSdamage and4204CCand that4205IN/thatthat you4206PPyou 're4207VBPbe going4208VVGgo to4209TOto need4210VVneed to4211TOto divide4212VVdivide these4213DTthese two4214CDtwo things4215NNSthing up4216RBup to4217TOto figure4218VVfigure out4219RPout ,4220,, you4221PPyou know4222VVPknow ,4223,, what4224WPwhat 's4225VBZbe compensation4226NNcompensation .4227SENT. And4228CCand we4229PPwe think4230VVPthink there4231EXthere 's4232VBZbe a4233DTa common-sense4234JJcommon-sense reason4235NNreason for4236INfor treating4237VVGtreat pain4238NNpain and4239CCand suffering4240NNsuffering as4241INas different4242JJdifferent ,4243,, which4244WDTwhich is4245VBZbe lost4246VVNlose ...4247:... lost4248VVNlose time4249NNtime payments4250NNSpayment are4251VBPbe a4252DTa substitute4253NNsubstitute for4254INfor something4255NNsomething that4256WDTthat 's4257VBZbe taxable4258JJtaxable .4259SENT. They4260PPthey 're4261VBPbe a4262DTa substitute4263NNsubstitute for4264INfor wages4265NNSwage that4266WDTthat ...4267:... that4268IN/thatthat the4269DTthe employee4270NNemployee would4271MDwould have4272VHhave been4273VBNbe taxed4274VVNtax on4275RPon .4276SENT. And4277CCand they4278PPthey 're4279VBPbe getting4280VVGget credited4281VVNcredit to4282TOto your4283PP$your benefits4284NNSbenefit on4285INon the4286DTthe RRB4287NPRRB side4288NNside .4289SENT. In4290INin contrast4291NNcontrast ,4292,, a4293DTa pain4294NNpain and4295CCand suffering4296NNsuffering judgment4297NNjudgment is4298VBZbe essentially4299RBessentially putting4300VVGput you4301PPyou in4302INin the4303DTthe place4304NNplace you4305PPyou would4306MDwould be4307VBbe if4308INif you4309PPyou had4310VHDhave n't4311RBn't lost4312VVNlose some4313DTsome sort4314NNsort of4315INof psychic4316JJpsychic or4317CCor physical4318JJphysical well-being4319NNwell-being that4320WDTthat would4321MDwould n't4322RBn't have4323VHhave been4324VBNbe taxed4325VVNtax .4326SENT. So4327RBso we4328PPwe think4329VVPthink it4330PPit 's4331VBZbe understandable4332JJunderstandable that4333IN/thatthat Congress4334NPCongress ,4335,, in4336INin making4337VVGmake those4338DTthose sort4339NNsort of4340INof changes4341NNSchange that4342WDTthat make4343VVPmake clear4344JJclear that4345IN/thatthat time4346NNtime lost4347VVDlose and4348CCand pain4349NNpain and4350CCand suffering4351NNsuffering are4352VBPbe treated4353VVNtreat differently4354RBdifferently in4355INin 19464356CD@card@ ,4357,, we4358PPwe think4359VVPthink it4360PPit 's4361VBZbe ...4362:... it4363PPit makes4364VVZmake sense4365NNsense that4366IN/thatthat Congress4367NPCongress thought4368VVDthink of4369INof these4370DTthese two4371CDtwo things4372NNSthing as4373INas different4374JJdifferent as4375INas one4376PPone is4377VBZbe taxable4378JJtaxable and4379CCand one4380PPone is4381VBZbe not4382RBnot .4383SENT. And4384CCand if4385INif you4386PPyou look4387VVPlook at4388INat the4389DTthe history4390NNhistory of4391INof those4392DTthose 19464393CD@card@ changes4394NNSchange ,4395,, I4396PPI think4397VVPthink that4398WDTthat 's4399VBZbe ...4400:... that4401WDTthat 's4402VBZbe sort4403NNsort of4404INof the4405DTthe ...4406:... the4407DTthe distinction4408NNdistinction that4409WDTthat 's4410VBZbe being4411VBGbe reflected4412VVNreflect in4413INin the4414DTthe history4415NNhistory too4416RBtoo .4417SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4418LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Ms4419NNMs .4420SENT. Kovner4421NPKovner ,4422,, one4423CDone of4424INof the4425DTthe things4426NNSthing that4427WDTthat strikes4428VVZstrike me4429PPme as4430INas a4431DTa little4432JJlittle bit4433NNbit odd4434JJodd about4435INabout an4436DTan award4437NNaward like4438INlike this4439DTthis fitting4440NNfitting into4441INinto the4442DTthe "4443``" services4444NNSservice rendered4445VVDrender "4446``" language4447NNlanguage is4448VBZbe that4449IN/thatthat ,4450,, unlike4451INunlike most4452JJSmost kinds4453NNSkind of4454INof compensation4455NNcompensation that4456IN/thatthat you4457PPyou can4458MDcan think4459VVthink of4460INof ,4461,, you4462PPyou could4463MDcould get4464VVget this4465DTthis if4466INif you4467PPyou were4468VBDbe injured4469VVNinjure your4470PP$your first4471JJfirst hour4472NNhour on4473INon the4474DTthe job4475NNjob without4476INwithout having4477VHGhave worked4478VVNwork at4479INat all4480DTall ,4481,, without4482INwithout having4483VHGhave rendered4484VVNrender any4485DTany services4486NNSservice at4487INat all4488DTall .4489SENT. [MS. KOVNER]4490LOC[MS. KOVNER] Yeah4491NPYeah .4492SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4493LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So4494INso what4495WPwhat about4496INabout that4497DTthat ?4498SENT? [MS. KOVNER]4499LOC[MS. KOVNER] Well4500UHwell ,4501,, I4502PPI think4503VVPthink there4504EXthere are4505VBPbe a4506DTa number4507NNnumber of4508INof forms4509NNSform of4510INof compensation4511NNcompensation that4512WDTthat operate4513VVPoperate like4514INlike that4515DTthat .4516SENT. You4517PPyou know4518VVPknow ,4519,, so4520RBso ...4521:... so4522RBso one4523CDone example4524NNexample that4525IN/thatthat Nierotko4526NPNierotko gave4527VVDgive is4528VBZbe something4529NNsomething that4530WDTthat would4531MDwould be4532VBbe compensation4533NNcompensation in4534INin that4535WDTthat it4536PPit was4537VBDbe thinking4538VVGthink of4539INof is4540VBZbe like4541INlike payment4542NNpayment for4543INfor when4544WRBwhen you4545PPyou 're4546VBPbe required4547VVNrequire to4548TOto be4549VBbe paid4550VVNpay for4551INfor jury4552NNjury service4553NNservice .4554SENT. I4555PPI mean4556VVPmean ,4557,, that4558WDTthat 's4559VBZbe a4560DTa benefit4561NNbenefit you4562PPyou would4563MDwould be4564VBbe entitled4565VVNentitle to4566TOto on4567INon day4568NNday one4569CDone .4570SENT. It4571PPit does4572VVZdo n't4573RBn't necessarily4574RBnecessarily correlate4575VVPcorrelate to4576TOto hours4577NNShour you4578PPyou work4579VVPwork ,4580,, but4581CCbut it4582PPit 's4583VBZbe a4584DTa benefit4585NNbenefit you4586PPyou get4587VVPget as4588INas an4589DTan employee4590NNemployee .4591SENT. Another4592DTanother example4593NNexample would4594MDwould be4595VBbe like4596INlike maternity4597NNmaternity leave4598NNleave ,4599,, sick4600JJsick leave4601NNleave in4602INin certain4603JJcertain kinds4604NNSkind of4605INof circumstances4606NNScircumstance .4607SENT. I4608PPI think4609VVPthink there4610EXthere are4611VBPbe a4612DTa whole4613JJwhole bunch4614NNbunch of4615INof benefits4616NNSbenefit that4617IN/thatthat you4618PPyou get4619VVPget as4620INas part4621NNpart of4622INof your4623PP$your sort4624NNsort of4625INof employee4626NNemployee compensation4627NNcompensation that4628WDTthat do4629VVPdo n't4630RBn't exactly4631RBexactly correlate4632JJcorrelate to4633TOto individual4634JJindividual hours4635NNShour that4636IN/thatthat you4637PPyou work4638VVPwork .4639SENT. And4640CCand even4641RBeven setting4642VVGset aside4643RPaside all4644PDTall these4645DTthese ,4646,, you4647PPyou know4648VVPknow ,4649,, textual4650JJtextual and4651CCand ...4652:... and4653CCand precedential4654JJprecedential indicators4655NNSindicator ,4656,, you4657PPyou know4658VVPknow ,4659,, we4660PPwe would4661MDwould note4662VVnote that4663IN/thatthat this4664DTthis has4665VHZhave been4666VBNbe the4667DTthe position4668NNposition of4669INof the4670DTthe agency4671NNagency since4672INsince the4673DTthe statute4674NNstatute was4675VBDbe enacted4676VVNenact in4677INin 19374678CD@card@ .4679SENT. Congress4680NPCongress amend4681VVPamend ...4682:... has4683VHZhave amended4684VVNamend this4685DTthis statute4686NNstatute many4687JJmany times4688NNStime against4689INagainst that4690DTthat backdrop4691NNbackdrop ,4692,, and4693CCand it4694PPit has4695VHZhave n't4696RBn't chosen4697VVNchoose to4698TOto change4699VVchange that4700DTthat agency4701NNagency interpretation4702NNinterpretation .4703SENT. So4704RBso we4705PPwe think4706VVPthink this4707DTthis is4708VBZbe a4709DTa ...4710:... you4711PPyou know4712VVPknow ,4713,, an4714DTan interpretation4715NNinterpretation that4716WDTthat 's4717VHZhave informed4718VVNinform what4719WPwhat Congress4720NPCongress has4721VHZhave done4722VVNdo .4723SENT. It4724PPit 's4725VHZhave added4726VVNadd exclusions4727NNSexclusion that4728WDTthat do4729VVPdo n't4730RBn't really4731RBreally make4732VVmake sense4733NNsense unless4734INunless time4735NNtime lost4736VVNlose is4737VBZbe covered4738VVNcover without4739INwithout changing4740VVGchange the4741DTthe agency4742NNagency 's4743POS's interpretation4744NNinterpretation .4745SENT. So4746RBso ,4747,, under4748INunder principles4749NNSprinciple of4750INof acquiescence4751NNacquiescence and4752CCand Chevron4753NPChevron deference4754NNdeference ,4755,, if4756INif there4757EXthere were4758VBDbe ambiguity4759NNambiguity ,4760,, we4761PPwe think4762VVPthink the4763DTthe agency4764NNagency 's4765POS's interpretation4766NNinterpretation would4767MDwould control4768VVcontrol .4769SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4770LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] But4771CCbut you4772PPyou actually4773RBactually do4774VVPdo n't4775RBn't think4776VVthink there4777EXthere 's4778VBZbe ambiguity4779NNambiguity ?4780SENT? [MS. KOVNER]4781LOC[MS. KOVNER] We4782PPwe do4783VVPdo n't4784RBn't .4785SENT. We4786PPwe think4787VVPthink this4788DTthis is4789VBZbe a4790DTa clear4791JJclear case4792NNcase .4793SENT. If4794INif there4795EXthere are4796VBPbe no4797RBno further4798JJRfurther questions4799NNSquestion ,4800,, we4801PPwe would4802MDwould ask4803VVask the4804DTthe judgment4805NNjudgment below4806RBbelow be4807VBbe reversed4808VVNreverse .4809SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4810LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank4811VVthank you4812PPyou ,4813,, counsel4814NNcounsel .4815SENT. Mr4816NPMr .4817SENT. Frederick4818NPFrederick .4819SENT.

[MR. FREDERICK]4820LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Thank4821VVthank you4822PPyou ,4823,, Mr4824NPMr .4825SENT. Chief4826NPChief Justice4827NPJustice ,4828,, and4829CCand may4830MDmay it4831PPit please4832VVplease the4833DTthe Court4834NPCourt :4835:: At4836INat issue4837NNissue in4838INin this4839DTthis case4840NNcase is4841VBZbe whether4842INwhether the4843DTthe Court4844NPCourt construes4845VVZconstrue the4846DTthe statute4847NNstatute as4848INas it4849PPit 's4850VBZbe currently4851RBcurrently written4852VVNwrite or4853CCor whether4854INwhether you4855PPyou construe4856VVPconstrue it4857PPit the4858DTthe way4859NNway the4860DTthe other4861JJother side4862NNside would4863MDwould like4864VVlike it4865PPit to4866TOto read4867VVread .4868SENT. Our4869PP$our position4870NNposition is4871VBZbe that4872IN/thatthat the4873DTthe plain4874JJplain language4875NNlanguage controls4876NNScontrol and4877CCand that4878IN/thatthat the4879DTthe statute4880NNstatute now4881RBnow in4882INin effect4883NNeffect does4884VVZdo not4885RBnot contain4886VVcontain all4887PDTall the4888DTthe words4889NNSword and4890CCand extra4891JJextra provisions4892NNSprovision that4893WDTthat get4894VVPget you4895PPyou to4896TOto a4897DTa place4898NNplace where4899WRBwhere "4900``" services4901NNSservice rendered4902VVDrender "4903``" means4904VVZmean not4905RBnot services4906NNSservice rendered4907VVNrender ,4908,, which4909WDTwhich is4910VBZbe the4911DTthe core4912NNcore of4913INof the4914DTthe other4915JJother side4916NNside 's4917POS's position4918NNposition .4919SENT. "4920''" Services4921NNSservice rendered4922VVDrender "4923``" has4924VHZhave a4925DTa very4926RBvery plain4927JJplain meaning4928NNmeaning .4929SENT. It4930PPit is4931VBZbe providing4932VVGprovide work4933NNwork under4934INunder the4935DTthe supervision4936NNsupervision of4937INof another4938DTanother person4939NNperson .4940SENT. When4941WRBwhen Mr4942NPMr .4943SENT. Loos4944NNSloo was4945VBDbe injured4946VVNinjure here4947RBhere ,4948,, he4949PPhe was4950VBDbe unable4951JJunable to4952TOto provide4953VVprovide services4954NNSservice .4955SENT. That4956DTthat was4957VBDbe the4958DTthe whole4959JJwhole point4960NNpoint of4961INof him4962PPhim bringing4963VVGbring his4964PP$his FELA4965NPFela claim4966NNclaim .4967SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4968LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well4969UHWell ,4970,, but4971CCbut he4972PPhe had4973VHDhave provide4974VVprovide serve4975VVserve ...4976:... provided4977VVNprovide services4978NNSservice ,4979,, and4980CCand that4981DTthat is4982VBZbe what4983WPwhat entitled4984VVDentitle him4985PPhim to4986TOto the4987DTthe payments4988NNSpayment that4989IN/thatthat he4990PPhe received4991VVDreceive .4992SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]4993LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Incorrect4994JJincorrect ,4995,, Mr4996NPMr .4997SENT. Chief4998NPChief Justice4999NPJustice .5000SENT. What5001WPWhat entitled5002VVDentitle him5003PPhim to5004TOto the5005DTthe payments5006NNSpayment that5007IN/thatthat he5008PPhe received5009VVDreceive was5010VBDbe that5011IN/thatthat he5012PPhe could5013MDcould n't5014RBn't work5015VVwork .5016SENT. And5017CCand it5018PPit was5019VBDbe the5020DTthe railroad5021NNrailroad 's5022POS's negligence5023NNnegligence ...5024:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5025LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well5026UHwell ,5027,, it5028PPit 's5029VBZbe not5030RBnot just5031RBjust somebody5032NNsomebody off5033INoff the5034DTthe street5035NNstreet who5036WPwho could5037MDcould n't5038RBn't work5039VVwork .5040SENT. It5041PPit was5042VBDbe an5043DTan employee5044NNemployee who5045WPwho could5046MDcould n't5047RBn't work5048VVwork ,5049,, and5050CCand he5051PPhe was5052VBDbe an5053DTan employee5054NNemployee because5055INbecause he5056PPhe had5057VHDhave rendered5058VVNrender services5059NNSservice .5060SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]5061LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Right5062RBright .5063SENT. But5064CCbut he5065PPhe had5066VHDhave n't5067RBn't rendered5068VVNrender the5069DTthe services5070NNSservice .5071SENT. That5072DTthat 's5073VBZbe the5074DTthe whole5075JJwhole point5076NNpoint .5077SENT. He5078PPhe was5079VBDbe unable5080JJunable to5081TOto render5082VVrender the5083DTthe services5084NNSservice because5085INbecause he5086PPhe was5087VBDbe hurt5088VVNhurt .5089SENT. So5090RBso let5091VVlet me5092PPme explain5093VVexplain a5094DTa little5095JJlittle bit5096NNbit about5097INabout how5098WRBhow day5099NNday call5100NNcall works5101VVZwork in5102INin a5103DTa union5104NNunion hall5105NNhall .5106SENT. Here5107RBhere ,5108,, Mr5109NPMr .5110SENT. Loos5111NNSloo was5112VBDbe subject5113JJsubject under5114INunder the5115DTthe union5116NNunion terms5117NNSterm to5118TOto be5119VBbe in5120INin a5121DTa union5122NNunion hall5123NNhall ,5124,, and5125CCand if5126INif he5127PPhe 's5128VBZbe called5129VVNcall in5130INin to5131TOto a5132DTa crew5133NNcrew ,5134,, he5135PPhe makes5136VVZmake money5137NNmoney .5138SENT. He5139PPhe gets5140VVZget paid5141VVNpay for5142INfor that5143DTthat day5144NNday .5145SENT. If5146INif he5147PPhe 's5148VBZbe unable5149JJunable to5150TOto make5151VVmake it5152PPit to5153TOto the5154DTthe union5155NNunion hall5156NNhall because5157INbecause he5158PPhe 's5159VBZbe injured5160VVNinjure ,5161,, it5162PPit 's5163VHZhave considered5164VVNconsider nothing5165NNnothing .5166SENT. He5167PPhe does5168VVZdo n't5169RBn't get5170VVget paid5171VVNpay for5172INfor that5173DTthat ,5174,, he5175PPhe does5176VVZdo n't5177RBn't accrue5178VVaccrue any5179DTany vacation5180NNvacation pay5181NNpay for5182INfor that5183DTthat .5184SENT. And5185CCand the5186DTthe whole5187JJwhole point5188NNpoint of5189INof the5190DTthe FELA5191NPFela judgment5192NNjudgment here5193RBhere was5194VBDbe that5195IN/thatthat because5196INbecause he5197PPhe was5198VBDbe injured5199VVNinjure ,5200,, he5201PPhe was5202VBDbe n't5203RBn't able5204JJable to5205TOto be5206VBbe in5207INin the5208DTthe union5209NNunion hall5210NNhall at5211INat the5212DTthe time5213NNtime the5214DTthe railroad5215NNrailroad called5216VVNcall for5217INfor people5218NNSpeople to5219TOto serve5220VVserve on5221INon their5222PP$their crews5223NNScrew .5224SENT. So5225RBso ,5226,, if5227INif you5228PPyou were5229VBDbe to5230TOto suppose5231VVsuppose that5232DTthat Mr5233NNMr .5234SENT. Loos5235NNSloo was5236VBDbe walking5237VVGwalk along5238RPalong at5239INat the5240DTthe time5241NNtime he5242PPhe was5243VBDbe injured5244VVNinjure and5245CCand he5246PPhe was5247VBDbe with5248INwith a5249DTa non-railroad5250NNnon-railroad employee5251NNemployee ,5252,, and5253CCand suppose5254VVPsuppose that5255IN/thatthat non-railroad5256NNnon-railroad employee5257NNemployee was5258VBDbe with5259INwith a5260DTa coal5261NNcoal company5262NNcompany and5263CCand they5264PPthey both5265CCboth fell5266VVDfall into5267INinto the5268DTthe drainage5269NNdrainage part5270NNpart ...5271:... pit5272NNpit because5273INbecause of5274INof the5275DTthe negligence5276NNnegligence of5277INof the5278DTthe railroad5279NNrailroad ,5280,, you5281PPyou would5282MDwould n't5283RBn't say5284VVsay that5285IN/thatthat the5286DTthe past5287JJpast wages5288NNSwage or5289CCor the5290DTthe lost5291VVNlose wages5292NNSwage that5293IN/thatthat the5294DTthe coal5295NNcoal company5296NNcompany employee5297NNemployee suffered5298VVNsuffer by5299INby the5300DTthe railroad5301NNrailroad 's5302POS's negligence5303NNnegligence was5304VBDbe "5305``" for5306INfor services5307NNSservice rendered5308VVNrender .5309SENT. "5310``" You5311PPyou would5312MDwould n't5313RBn't say5314VVsay that5315IN/thatthat at5316INat all5317DTall .5318SENT. There5319EXthere would5320MDwould be5321VBbe no5322DTno basis5323NNbasis for5324INfor saying5325VVGsay that5326DTthat .5327SENT. And5328CCand so5329RBso it5330PPit 's5331VBZbe odd5332JJodd to5333TOto suppose5334VVsuppose that5335IN/thatthat simply5336RBsimply because5337INbecause Mr5338NPMr .5339SENT. Loos5340NPLoos is5341VBZbe capable5342JJcapable or5343CCor subject5344JJsubject to5345TOto being5346VBGbe called5347VVNcall into5348INinto a5349DTa duty5350NNduty status5351NNstatus for5352INfor the5353DTthe crew5354NNcrew that5355IN/thatthat you5356PPyou ...5357:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5358LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But5359CCbut a5360DTa lot5361NNlot of5362INof these5363DTthese ...5364:... [MR. FREDERICK]5365LOC[MR. FREDERICK] ...5366:... that5367IN/thatthat you5368PPyou would5369MDwould treat5370VVtreat him5371PPhim any5372DTany differently5373RBdifferently .5374SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5375LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...5376:... kind5377NNkind of5378INof arguments5379NNSargument were5380VBDbe made5381VVNmake in5382INin Nierotko5383NPNierotko ,5384,, and5385CCand the5386DTthe Court5387NPCourt rejected5388VVDreject those5389DTthose in5390INin the5391DTthe ...5392:... admittedly5393RBadmittedly ,5394,, in5395INin the5396DTthe context5397NNcontext of5398INof the5399DTthe Social5400NPSocial Security5401NPSecurity Act5402NPAct ,5403,, but5404CCbut why5405WRBwhy not5406RBnot follow5407VVfollow the5408DTthe same5409JJsame interpretation5410NNinterpretation here5411RBhere ?5412SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]5413LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Well5414UHWell ,5415,, what5416WPwhat the5417DTthe Court5418NPCourt in5419INin Nierotko5420NPNierotko did5421VVDdo was5422VBDbe it5423PPit construed5424VVDconstrue the5425DTthe benefits5426NNSbenefit statute5427NNstatute .5428SENT. And5429CCand what5430WPwhat Cleveland5431NPCleveland Indians5432NPSIndians says5433VVZsay and5434CCand is5435VBZbe absolutely5436RBabsolutely clear5437JJclear is5438VBZbe that5439IN/thatthat you5440PPyou do5441VVPdo not5442RBnot construe5443VVconstrue the5444DTthe tax5445NNtax statute5446NNstatute the5447DTthe same5448JJsame as5449INas the5450DTthe benefits5451NNSbenefit statute5452NNstatute .5453SENT. The5454DTthe ...5455:... the5456DTthe case5457NNcase of5458INof Hisquierdo5459NNHisquierdo ...5460:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5461LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] The5462DTthe Cleveland5463NPCleveland Indians5464NPSIndians was5465VBDbe about5466RBabout the5467DTthe allocation5468NNallocation time5469NNtime period5470NNperiod .5471SENT. It5472PPit was5473VBDbe n't5474RBn't about5475INabout the5476DTthe main5477JJmain holding5478NNholding of5479INof Nierotko5480NPNierotko in5481INin terms5482NNSterm of5483INof how5484WRBhow it5485PPit departed5486VVDdepart from5487INfrom Nierotko5488NPNierotko .5489SENT. Is5490VBZbe that5491DTthat ...5492:... [MR. FREDERICK]5493LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Right5494RBright .5495SENT. But5496CCbut the5497DTthe interpretive5498JJinterpretive method5499NNmethod that5500IN/thatthat the5501DTthe Court5502NNcourt employed5503VVNemploy was5504VBDbe different5505JJdifferent in5506INin the5507DTthe sense5508NNsense ...5509:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5510LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] True5511NPTrue .5512SENT. But5513CCbut the5514DTthe precedent5515NNprecedent on5516INon point5517NNpoint interprets5518VVZinterpret ...5519:... says5520VVZsay that5521IN/thatthat time5522NNtime lost5523VVNlose is5524VBZbe part5525NNpart of5526INof services5527NNSservice rendered5528VVNrender or5529CCor services5530NNSservice performed5531VVNperform in5532INin the5533DTthe context5534NNcontext of5535INof the5536DTthe Social5537NPSocial Security5538NPSecurity Act5539NPAct .5540SENT. So5541RBso why5542WRBwhy not5543RBnot adhere5544VVadhere to5545TOto that5546DTthat same5547JJsame interpretation5548NNinterpretation in5549INin this5550DTthis context5551NNcontext at5552INat this5553DTthis point5554NNpoint ?5555SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]5556LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Because5557INbecause this5558DTthis Court5559NPCourt ,5560,, to5561TOto my5562PP$my knowledge5563NNknowledge ,5564,, has5565VHZhave not5566RBnot ever5567RBever said5568VVDsay that5569IN/thatthat you5570PPyou construe5571VVPconstrue taxing5572VVGtax statutes5573NNSstatute by5574INby looking5575VVGlook at5576INat benefits5577NNSbenefit statutes5578NNSstatute .5579SENT. And5580CCand that5581DTthat is5582VBZbe what5583WPwhat ...5584:... exactly5585RBexactly what5586WPwhat Cleveland5587NPCleveland Indians5588NPSIndians holds5589VVZhold .5590SENT. That5591DTthat 's5592VBZbe also5593RBalso what5594WPwhat the5595DTthe case5596NNcase of5597INof Hisquierdo5598NPHisquierdo holds5599VVZhold .5600SENT. Hisquierdo5601NNHisquierdo is5602VBZbe directly5603RBdirectly on5604INon point5605NNpoint for5606INfor the5607DTthe Railroad5608NPRailroad Retirement5609NPRetirement Tax5610NPTax Act5611NPAct .5612SENT. The5613DTthe other5614JJother side5615NNside has5616VHZhave no5617DTno discussion5618NNdiscussion about5619INabout the5620DTthe language5621NNlanguage in5622INin that5623DTthat opinion5624NNopinion ,5625,, which5626WDTwhich says5627VVZsay that5628IN/thatthat RRTA5629NPRRTA taxes5630NNStaxis are5631VBPbe to5632TOto be5633VBbe construed5634VVNconstrue differently5635RBdifferently than5636INthan the5637DTthe Railroad5638NPRailroad Retirement5639NPRetirement Board5640NPBoard benefits5641NNSbenefit .5642SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5643LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Mr5644NPMr .5645SENT. Frederick5646NPFrederick ,5647,, your5648PP$your argument5649NNargument would5650MDwould go5651VVgo for5652INfor the5653DTthe railroad5654NNrailroad as5655RBas well5656RBwell as5657INas the5658DTthe employee5659NNemployee ,5660,, right5661RBright ?5662SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]5663LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Yes5664NPYes .5665SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5666LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] So5667INso this5668DTthis ...5669:... this5670DTthis railroad5671NNrailroad paid5672VVDpay a5673DTa tax5674NNtax that5675IN/thatthat it5676PPit was5677VBDbe n't5678RBn't required5679VVNrequire to5680TOto pay5681VVpay ,5682,, could5683MDcould it5684PPit seek5685VVseek a5686DTa refund5687NNrefund ?5688SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]5689LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Yes5690NPYes .5691SENT. And5692CCand ,5693,, in5694INin fact5695NNfact ,5696,, the5697DTthe railroad5698NNrailroad did5699VVDdo n't5700RBn't pay5701VVpay the5702DTthe tax5703NNtax until5704INuntil the5705DTthe case5706NNcase was5707VBDbe on5708INon appeal5709NNappeal in5710INin the5711DTthe Eighth5712JJeighth Circuit5713NNcircuit .5714SENT. It5715PPit did5716VVDdo not5717RBnot pay5718VVpay the5719DTthe tax5720NNtax ,5721,, you5722PPyou know5723VVPknow ,5724,, at5725INat the5726DTthe time5727NNtime of5728INof the5729DTthe judgment5730NNjudgment .5731SENT. It5732PPit waited5733VVDwait as5734INas a5735DTa means5736NNSmean ,5737,, presumably5738RBpresumably ,5739,, to5740TOto enhance5741VVenhance the5742DTthe persuasiveness5743NNpersuasiveness of5744INof its5745PP$its argument5746NNargument on5747INon appeal5748NNappeal .5749SENT. Now5750RBnow ,5751,, Justice5752NPJustice Gorsuch5753NPGorsuch ,5754,, I5755PPI do5756VVPdo want5757VVwant to5758TOto address5759VVaddress your5760PP$your workers5761NNSworker '5762POS' compensation5763NNcompensation issue5764NNissue .5765SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]5766LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I5767PPI was5768VBDbe ...5769:... I5770PPI was5771VBDbe going5772VVGgo to5773TOto ask5774VVask you5775PPyou if5776INif you5777PPyou 'd5778MDwould volunteer5779VVvolunteer .5780SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]5781LOC[MR. FREDERICK] And5782CCand ...5783:... yes5784UHyes .5785SENT. There5786RBthere ...5787:... there5788RBthere ...5789:... let5790VVlet me5791PPme begin5792VVbegin by5793INby giving5794VVGgive a5795DTa little5796JJlittle bit5797NNbit of5798INof history5799NNhistory if5800INif I5801PPI could5802MDcould .5803SENT. The5804DTthe FELA5805NPFela was5806VBDbe enacted5807VVNenact prior5808RBprior to5809TOto most5810JJSmost states5811NNSstate enacting5812VVGenact workers5813NNSworker '5814POS' compensation5815NNcompensation statutes5816NNSstatute ,5817,, and5818CCand it5819PPit has5820VHZhave been5821VBNbe held5822VVNhold by5823INby this5824DTthis Court5825NPCourt to5826TOto preempt5827VVpreempt the5828DTthe FELA5829NPFela ,5830,, to5831TOto preempt5832VVpreempt workers5833NNSworker '5834POS' compensation5835NNcompensation statutes5836NNSstatute .5837SENT. So5838INso the5839DTthe only5840JJonly time5841NNtime where5842WRBwhere there5843EXthere 's5844VBZbe actually5845RBactually an5846DTan overlap5847VVPoverlap is5848VBZbe where5849WRBwhere you5850PPyou have5851VHPhave a5852DTa purely5853RBpurely ...5854:... purely5855RBpurely intra-state5856JJintra-state railroad5857NNrailroad .5858SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]5859LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] No5860NPNo ,5861,, I5862PPI follow5863VVPfollow all5864DTall of5865INof that5866DTthat .5867SENT. And5868CCand your5869PP$your Footnote5870NNfootnote 95871CD9 was5872VBDbe excellent5873JJexcellent in5874INin explaining5875VVGexplain that5876DTthat .5877SENT. But5878CCbut my5879PP$my question5880NNquestion still5881RBstill remains5882VVZremain ,5883,, if5884INif a5885DTa judgment5886NNjudgment of5887INof an5888DTan administrative5889JJadministrative agency5890NNagency in5891INin a5892DTa state5893NNstate setting5894NNsetting ,5895,, in5896INin an5897DTan admittedly5898RBadmittedly intra-state5899JJintra-state accident5900NNaccident is5901VBZbe ,5902,, you5903PPyou would5904MDwould concede5905VVconcede ,5906,, I5907PPI believe5908VVPbelieve ,5909,, compensation5910NNcompensation for5911INfor wages5912NNSwage ,5913,, then5914RBthen why5915RBwhy ...5916:... why5917WRBwhy would5918MDwould n't5919RBn't a5920DTa federal5921JJfederal inter-state5922NNinter-state FELA5923NPFela judgment5924NNjudgment ?5925SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]5926LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Worker5927NPWorker 's5928POS's compensation5929NNcompensation has5930VHZhave always5931RBalways been5932VBNbe treated5933VVNtreat differently5934RBdifferently in5935INin the5936DTthe sense5937NNsense that5938WDTthat insure5939VVPinsure ...5940:... the5941DTthe employee5942NNemployee and5943CCand the5944DTthe employer5945NNemployer contributes5946VVZcontribute to5947TOto an5948DTan insurance5949NNinsurance fund5950NNfund .5951SENT. It5952PPit 's5953VBZbe no5954DTno fault5955NNfault insurance5956NNinsurance .5957SENT. And5958CCand for5959INfor that5960DTthat reason5961NNreason ,5962,, it5963PPit is5964VBZbe more5965JJRmore ,5966,, I5967PPI think5968VVPthink ,5969,, appropriately5970RBappropriately deemed5971VVNdeem to5972TOto be5973VBbe an5974DTan additional5975JJadditional payment5976NNpayment that5977WDTthat is5978VBZbe for5979INfor services5980NNSservice rendered5981VVNrender ,5982,, in5983INin the5984DTthe same5985JJsame way5986NNway that5987IN/thatthat sick5988JJsick pay5989NNpay accumulates5990VVZaccumulate over5991INover time5992NNtime in5993INin ...5994:... in5995INin the5996DTthe appropriate5997JJappropriate circumstances5998NNScircumstance .5999SENT. It6000PPit did6001VVDdo n't6002RBn't for6003INfor Mr6004NPMr .6005SENT. Loos6006NPLoos .6007SENT. But6008CCbut ,6009,, for6010INfor vacation6011NNvacation pay6012NNpay ,6013,, if6014INif you6015PPyou 're6016VBPbe a6017DTa federal6018JJfederal employee6019NNemployee and6020CCand you6021PPyou have6022VHPhave a6023DTa 40-hour6024JJ40-hour pay6025NNpay stub6026NNstub and6027CCand it6028PPit shows6029VVZshow a6030DTa certain6031JJcertain number6032NNnumber of6033INof hours6034NNShour that6035IN/thatthat you6036PPyou 've6037VHPhave accrued6038VVNaccrue for6039INfor vacation6040NNvacation pay6041NNpay ,6042,, those6043DTthose are6044VBPbe all6045RBall for6046INfor the6047DTthe services6048NNSservice that6049IN/thatthat you6050PPyou rendered6051VVDrender as6052INas an6053DTan employee6054NNemployee .6055SENT. Now6056RBnow ,6057,, with6058INwith respect6059NNrespect to6060TOto worker6061NNworker 's6062POS's compensation6063NNcompensation ,6064,, because6065INbecause it6066PPit 's6067VBZbe an6068DTan insurance6069NNinsurance scheme6070NNscheme that6071WDTthat is6072VBZbe no6073DTno fault6074NNfault ,6075,, it6076PPit operates6077VVZoperate in6078INin a6079DTa very6080RBvery different6081JJdifferent way6082NNway in6083INin terms6084NNSterm of6085INof how6086WRBhow it6087PPit is6088VBZbe funded6089VVNfund .6090SENT. There6091EXthere 's6092VBZbe no6093RBno pre-funding6094VVGpre-fund on6095INon the6096DTthe part6097NNpart of6098INof the6099DTthe railroad6100NNrailroad for6101INfor FELA6102NPFela damages6103NNSdamage .6104SENT. The6105DTthe whole6106JJwhole point6107NNpoint of6108INof the6109DTthe FELA6110NPFela is6111VBZbe to6112TOto impose6113VVimpose a6114DTa duty6115NNduty of6116INof due6117JJdue care6118NNcare on6119INon the6120DTthe industry6121NNindustry so6122INso that6123DTthat workers6124NNSworker are6125VBPbe not6126RBnot being6127VBGbe injured6128VVNinjure as6129INas a6130DTa result6131NNresult of6132INof the6133DTthe railroad6134NNrailroad 's6135POS's negligence6136NNnegligence .6137SENT. And6138CCand that6139DTthat 's6140VBZbe why6141WRBwhy Justice6142NPJustice Brandeis6143NPBrandeis in6144INin the6145DTthe Winfield6146NPWinfield case6147NNcase in6148INin the6149DTthe early6150JJearly 1920s6151NNS1920s made6152VVDmake very6153RBvery clear6154VVclear that6155IN/thatthat an6156DTan FELA6157NPFela judgment6158NNjudgment is6159VBZbe a6160DTa penalty6161NNpenalty for6162INfor the6163DTthe breach6164NNbreach of6165INof a6166DTa duty6167NNduty of6168INof due6169JJdue care6170NNcare .6171SENT. And6172CCand Justice6173NPJustice Scalia6174NPScalia ,6175,, in6176INin his6177PP$his separate6178JJseparate writing6179NNwriting in6180INin Cleveland6181NPCleveland Indians6182NPSIndians ,6183,, said6184VVDsay ,6185,, in6186INin his6187PP$his view6188NNview ,6189,, the6190DTthe question6191NNquestion is6192VBZbe different6193JJdifferent as6194RBas to6195TOto whether6196INwhether or6197CCor not6198RBnot it6199PPit is6200VBZbe a6201DTa court-ordered6202JJcourt-ordered judgment6203NNjudgment that6204WDTthat is6205VBZbe not6206RBnot the6207DTthe way6208NNway you6209PPyou ordinarily6210RBordinarily think6211VVPthink of6212INof wages6213NNSwage paid6214VVNpay ,6215,, which6216WDTwhich is6217VBZbe the6218DTthe way6219NNway that6220IN/thatthat the6221DTthe phrase6222NNphrase is6223VBZbe used6224VVNuse under6225INunder FICA6226NPFICA .6227SENT. So6228RBso ,6229,, if6230INif you6231PPyou look6232VVPlook at6233INat these6234DTthese textual6235JJtextual differences6236NNSdifference ,6237,, the6238DTthe line-drawing6239VVGline-draw ,6240,, I6241PPI think6242VVPthink ,6243,, Justice6244NPJustice Gorsuch6245NPGorsuch ,6246,, is6247VBZbe actually6248RBactually pretty6249RBpretty straightforward6250JJstraightforward .6251SENT. You6252PPyou ask6253VVPask the6254DTthe question6255NNquestion :6256:: Is6257VBZbe the6258DTthe work6259NNwork and6260CCand the6261DTthe pay6262NNpay here6263RBhere ,6264,, the6265DTthe compensation6266NNcompensation ,6267,, for6268INfor services6269NNSservice rendered6270VVNrender ?6271SENT? And6272CCand if6273INif it6274PPit 's6275VBZbe not6276RBnot ,6277,, which6278WDTwhich ,6279,, clearly6280RBclearly ,6281,, it6282PPit could6283MDcould n't6284RBn't be6285VBbe here6286RBhere because6287INbecause Mr6288NPMr .6289SENT. Loos6290NNSloo was6291VBDbe unable6292JJunable to6293TOto render6294VVrender services6295NNSservice ,6296,, then6297RBthen it6298PPit is6299VBZbe outside6300INoutside the6301DTthe realm6302NNrealm of6303INof the6304DTthe RRTA6305NPRRTA .6306SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]6307LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Well6308UHwell ,6309,, you6310PPyou put6311VVDput an6312DTan awful6313JJawful lot6314NNlot of6315INof weight6316NNweight on6317INon that6318DTthat ,6319,, but6320CCbut I6321PPI can6322MDcan easily6323RBeasily imagine6324VVimagine an6325DTan employer6326NNemployer explaining6327VVGexplain how6328WRBhow we6329PPwe work6330VVPwork in6331INin this6332DTthis company6333NNcompany .6334SENT. We6335PPwe work6336VVPwork in6337INin this6338DTthis company6339NNcompany is6340VBZbe that6341IN/thatthat we6342PPwe pay6343VVPpay you6344PPyou for6345INfor services6346NNSservice rendered6347VVNrender .6348SENT. By6349INby the6350DTthe way6351NNway ,6352,, services6353NNSservice rendered6354VVNrender includes6355VVZinclude Christmas6356NPChristmas Day6357NPDay ,6358,, though6359INthough you6360PPyou 're6361VBPbe not6362RBnot here6363RBhere .6364SENT. By6365INby the6366DTthe way6367NNway ,6368,, it6369PPit includes6370VVZinclude when6371WRBwhen you6372PPyou have6373VHPhave a6374DTa cold6375JJcold or6376CCor sick6377JJsick for6378INfor a6379DTa few6380JJfew days6381NNSday .6382SENT. That6383WDTthat we6384PPwe ...6385:... that6386IN/thatthat we6387PPwe count6388VVPcount all6389RBall that6390IN/thatthat as6391INas payment6392NNpayment for6393INfor services6394NNSservice rendered6395VVNrender .6396SENT. That6397DTthat person6398NNperson is6399VBZbe speaking6400VVGspeak English6401JJEnglish .6402SENT. So6403INso their6404PP$their first6405JJfirst argument6406NNargument is6407VBZbe ,6408,, at6409INat the6410DTthe least6411JJSleast ,6412,, it6413PPit 's6414VBZbe ambiguous6415JJambiguous .6416SENT. Their6417PP$their second6418JJsecond argument6419NNargument is6420VBZbe go6421VVgo and6422CCand look6423VVlook at6424INat all6425PDTall these6426DTthese changes6427NNSchange that6428WDTthat happened6429VVDhappen in6430INin the6431DTthe statute6432NNstatute over6433INover those6434DTthose years6435NNSyear .6436SENT. You6437PPyou know6438VVPknow what6439WPwhat they6440PPthey were6441VBDbe arguing6442VVGargue about6443RBabout ?6444SENT? They6445PPthey were6446VBDbe arguing6447VVGargue about6448RBabout whether6449INwhether you6450PPyou tax6451VVPtax it6452PPit at6453INat the6454DTthe time6455NNtime you6456PPyou would6457MDwould have6458VHhave worked6459VVNwork or6460CCor you6461PPyou tax6462VVPtax it6463PPit when6464WRBwhen you6465PPyou get6466VVPget it6467PPit after6468INafter the6469DTthe judgment6470NNjudgment now6471RBnow .6472SENT. They6473PPthey never6474RBnever thought6475VVDthink you6476PPyou did6477VVDdo n't6478RBn't get6479VVget it6480PPit at6481INat all6482DTall .6483SENT. And6484CCand their6485PP$their argument6486NNargument about6487INabout the6488DTthe two6489CDtwo statutes6490NNSstatute is6491VBZbe it6492PPit 's6493VBZbe a6494DTa plus6495NNplus .6496SENT. We6497PPwe 're6498VBPbe not6499RBnot saying6500VVGsay it6501PPit 's6502VBZbe necessary6503JJnecessary ,6504,, but6505CCbut it6506PPit 's6507VBZbe a6508DTa plus6509NNplus to6510TOto treat6511VVtreat the6512DTthe taxing6513VVGtax statute6514NNstatute symmetrical6515JJsymmetrical with6516INwith .6517SENT. And6518CCand their6519PP$their final6520JJfinal argument6521NNargument is6522VBZbe that6523IN/thatthat ,6524,, hey6525UHhey ,6526,, 806527CD@card@ years6528NNSyear is6529VBZbe a6530DTa long6531JJlong time6532NNtime .6533SENT. Justice6534NPJustice Blackmun6535NPBlackmun used6536VVDuse to6537TOto complain6538VVcomplain about6539INabout all6540PDTall these6541DTthese changes6542NNSchange .6543SENT. And6544CCand ,6545,, indeed6546RBindeed ,6547,, 806548CD@card@ years6549NNSyear ,6550,, Congress6551NPCongress has6552VHZhave done6553VVNdo nothing6554NNnothing ,6555,, okay6556JJokay .6557SENT. Now6558RBnow you6559PPyou 've6560VHPhave responded6561VVNrespond to6562TOto some6563DTsome .6564SENT. I6565PPI just6566RBjust want6567VVPwant to6568TOto be6569VBbe sure6570RBsure you6571PPyou get6572VVPget a6573DTa chance6574NNchance to6575TOto respond6576VVrespond to6577TOto all6578DTall .6579SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]6580LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Well6581UHWell ,6582,, if6583INif I6584PPI do6585VVPdo n't6586RBn't get6587VVget them6588PPthem all6589RBall in6590INin this6591DTthis response6592NNresponse ,6593,, Justice6594NPJustice Breyer6595NPBreyer ,6596,, please6597RBplease feel6598VVPfeel free6599JJfree to6600TOto interrupt6601VVinterrupt me6602PPme .6603SENT. But6604CCbut ,6605,, on6606INon the6607DTthe history6608NNhistory point6609NNpoint ,6610,, the6611DTthe other6612JJother side6613NNside ,6614,, notwithstanding6615INnotwithstanding our6616PP$our challenge6617NNchallenge ,6618,, cannot6619MDcan give6620VVgive you6621PPyou one6622CDone instance6623NNinstance ,6624,, not6625RBnot one6626CDone ,6627,, where6628WRBwhere the6629DTthe IRS6630NPIRS issued6631VVDissue a6632DTa deficiency6633NNdeficiency notice6634NNnotice because6635INbecause there6636EXthere had6637VHDhave been6638VBNbe a6639DTa failure6640NNfailure to6641TOto pay6642VVpay RRTA6643NPRRTA taxes6644NNStaxis for6645INfor an6646DTan FELA6647NPFela judgment6648NNjudgment .6649SENT. If6650INif you6651PPyou look6652VVPlook at6653INat the6654DTthe Federal6655NPFederal Judicial6656NPJudicial Center6657NPCenter 's6658POS's website6659NNwebsite ,6660,, there6661EXthere have6662VHPhave been6663VBNbe something6664NNsomething like6665INlike 71,0006666CD@card@ FELA6667NPFela suits6668NNSsuit filed6669VVDfile just6670RBjust since6671INsince 19706672CD@card@ .6673SENT. Now6674RBnow ,6675,, surely6676RBsurely ,6677,, if6678INif this6679DTthis had6680VHDhave been6681VBNbe the6682DTthe way6683NNway the6684DTthe taxing6685VVGtax service6686NNservice had6687VHDhave been6688VBNbe construing6689VVGconstrue this6690DTthis statute6691NNstatute ,6692,, there6693EXthere would6694MDwould be6695VBbe at6696INat least6697JJSleast $6698$$ 16699CD1 deposited6700VVNdeposit from6701INfrom the6702DTthe Treasury6703NNtreasury as6704INas a6705DTa result6706NNresult of6707INof an6708DTan FELA6709NPFela judgment6710NNjudgment and6711CCand a6712DTa deficiency6713NNdeficiency notice6714NNnotice for6715INfor a6716DTa failure6717NNfailure to6718TOto do6719VVdo that6720DTthat .6721SENT. This6722DTthis is6723VBZbe all6724PDTall a6725DTa new6726JJnew argument6727NNargument .6728SENT. And6729CCand the6730DTthe reason6731NNreason why6732WRBwhy the6733DTthe railroad6734NNrailroad has6735VHZhave come6736VVNcome up6737RPup with6738INwith this6739DTthis new6740JJnew argument6741NNargument is6742VBZbe simply6743RBsimply to6744TOto change6745VVchange the6746DTthe settlement6747NNsettlement dynamics6748NNSdynamics that6749WDTthat are6750VBPbe going6751VVGgo on6752INon .6753SENT. And6754CCand by6755INby changing6756VVGchange those6757DTthose settlement6758NNsettlement dynamics6759NNSdynamics ,6760,, they6761PPthey are6762VBPbe seeking6763VVGseek to6764TOto impose6765VVimpose the6766DTthe in6767INin terrorem6768NNterrorem threat6769NNthreat of6770INof a6771DTa taxation6772NNtaxation on6773INon the6774DTthe employee6775NNemployee at6776INat the6777DTthe time6778NNtime when6779WRBwhen there6780EXthere 's6781VBZbe a6782DTa negotiation6783NNnegotiation .6784SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6785LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I6786PPI 'm6787VBPbe sorry6788JJsorry .6789SENT. Explain6790VVexplain that6791IN/thatthat to6792TOto me6793PPme .6794SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]6795LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Sure6796NPSure .6797SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6798LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] What6799WDTwhat ...6800:... what6801WPwhat are6802VBPbe they6803PPthey going6804VVGgo to6805TOto do6806VVdo ?6807SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]6808LOC[MR. FREDERICK] What6809WPWhat they6810PPthey ...6811:... when6812WRBwhen there6813EXthere 's6814VBZbe a6815DTa settlement6816NNsettlement negotiation6817NNnegotiation ,6818,, Justice6819NPJustice Sotomayor6820NPSotomayor ,6821,, the6822DTthe question6823NNquestion is6824VBZbe will6825MDwill you6826PPyou ...6827:... will6828MDwill we6829PPwe pay6830VVpay you6831PPyou now6832RBnow for6833INfor your6834PP$your range6835NNrange of6836INof damages6837NNSdamage or6838CCor will6839MDwill you6840PPyou run6841VVrun the6842DTthe risk6843NNrisk of6844INof going6845VVGgo to6846TOto court6847NNcourt .6848SENT. And6849CCand as6850INas part6851NNpart of6852INof that6853DTthat calculus6854NNcalculus ,6855,, the6856DTthe question6857NNquestion is6858VBZbe whether6859INwhether or6860CCor not6861RBnot taxes6862NNStaxis would6863MDwould be6864VBbe owed6865VVNowe and6866CCand owing6867VVGowe on6868INon that6869DTthat .6870SENT. And6871CCand if6872INif the6873DTthe taxes6874NNStaxis are6875VBPbe not6876RBnot owed6877VVNowe and6878CCand owing6879VVGowe because6880INbecause it6881PPit is6882VBZbe a6883DTa judgment6884NNjudgment ,6885,, then6886RBthen that6887DTthat is6888VBZbe for6889INfor the6890DTthe workers6891NNSworker '6892POS' favor6893NNfavor in6894INin terms6895NNSterm of6896INof considering6897VVGconsider whether6898INwhether ...6899:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6900LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I6901PPI 'm6902VBPbe sorry6903JJsorry ...6904:... [MR. FREDERICK]6905LOC[MR. FREDERICK] ...6906:... or6907CCor not6908RBnot to6909TOto settle6910VVsettle the6911DTthe case6912NNcase .6913SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6914LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I6915PPI 'm6916VBPbe sorry6917JJsorry .6918SENT. There6919EXthere 's6920VBZbe a6921DTa settlement6922NNsettlement under6923INunder a6924DTa FELA6925NPFela action6926NNaction ,6927,, X6928NNX amount6929NNamount of6930INof money6931NNmoney .6932SENT. It6933PPit has6934VHZhave to6935TOto be6936VBbe attributed6937VVNattribute to6938TOto something6939NNsomething ,6940,, correct6941JJcorrect ?6942SENT? Are6943VBPbe you6944PPyou saying6945VVGsay ...6946:... [MR. FREDERICK]6947LOC[MR. FREDERICK] No6948RBno ,6949,, it6950PPit does6951VVZdo n't6952RBn't ,6953,, actually6954RBactually .6955SENT. There6956RBthere ...6957:... there6958RBthere ,6959,, I6960PPI do6961VVPdo n't6962RBn't understand6963VVunderstand their6964PP$their textual6965JJtextual argument6966NNargument for6967INfor that6968DTthat at6969INat all6970DTall because6971INbecause what6972WPwhat they6973PPthey 're6974VBPbe asking6975VVGask for6976INfor you6977PPyou to6978TOto do6979VVdo is6980VBZbe to6981TOto accept6982VVaccept the6983DTthe idea6984NNidea that6985IN/thatthat the6986DTthe Railroad6987NPRailroad Retirement6988NPRetirement Board6989NPBoard somehow6990RBsomehow has6991VHZhave the6992DTthe administrative6993JJadministrative authority6994NNauthority to6995TOto construe6996VVconstrue a6997DTa taxing6998VVGtax statute6999NNstatute .7000SENT. And7001CCand that7002DTthat 's7003VBZbe never7004RBnever been7005VBNbe the7006DTthe case7007NNcase where7008WRBwhere you7009PPyou have7010VHPhave a7011DTa benefit7012NNbenefit agency7013NNagency construing7014VVGconstrue the7015DTthe taxing7016VVGtax statute7017NNstatute .7018SENT. The7019DTthe taxing7020VVGtax statute7021NNstatute is7022VBZbe construed7023VVNconstrue by7024INby the7025DTthe IRS7026NPIRS .7027SENT. Now7028RBnow ,7029,, if7030INif you7031PPyou look7032VVPlook at7033INat the7034DTthe sources7035NNSsource in7036INin our7037PP$our Footnotes7038NNSfootnote 27039CD2 ,7040,, 37041CD3 ,7042,, and7043CCand 47044CD4 in7045INin our7046PP$our brief7047NNbrief ,7048,, they7049PPthey make7050VVPmake very7051RBvery clear7052VVclear that7053IN/thatthat the7054DTthe IRS7055NPIRS in7056INin ...7057:... in7058INin ...7059:... in7060INin interpretations7061NNSinterpretation that7062WDTthat post-date7063NNpost-date the7064DTthe sources7065NNSsource that7066IN/thatthat they7067PPthey 're7068VBPbe talking7069VVGtalk about7070RBabout here7071RBhere say7072VVPsay that7073IN/thatthat when7074WRBwhen there7075EXthere 's7076VBZbe a7077DTa personal7078JJpersonal injury7079NNinjury award7080NNaward ,7081,, it7082PPit is7083VBZbe not7084RBnot subject7085JJsubject to7086TOto income7087NNincome tax7088NNtax .7089SENT. And7090CCand in7091INin the7092DTthe first7093JJfirst one7094CDone ,7095,, the7096DTthe citation7097NNcitation that7098WDTthat is7099VBZbe on7100INon Footnote7101NNfootnote 27102CD2 of7103INof our7104PP$our brief7105NNbrief ,7106,, the7107DTthe IRS7108NPIRS specifically7109RBspecifically mentions7110VVZmention that7111IN/thatthat this7112DTthis would7113MDwould apply7114VVapply in7115INin the7116DTthe Railroad7117NPRailroad Retirement7118NPRetirement Tax7119NPTax Act7120NPAct concept7121NNconcept ...7122:... context7123NNcontext as7124INas well7125RBwell .7126SENT. That7127RBthat ,7128,, I7129PPI think7130VVPthink ,7131,, is7132VBZbe on7133INon page7134NNpage 137135CD@card@ or7136CCor 147137CD@card@ of7138INof that7139DTthat particular7140JJparticular reference7141NNreference .7142SENT. They7143PPthey hang7144VVPhang their7145PP$their hat7146NNhat on7147INon this7148DTthis 19807149CD@card@ advisory7150JJadvisory opinion7151NNopinion ...7152:... memo7153NNmemo ,7154,, but7155CCbut I7156PPI 'd7157MDwould like7158VVlike ...7159:... the7160DTthe ...7161:... the7162DTthe so-called7163JJso-called TAM7164NNtam ,7165,, but7166CCbut I7167PPI 'd7168MDwould like7169VVlike to7170TOto point7171VVpoint out7172RPout that7173IN/thatthat the7174DTthe ...7175:... under7176INunder the7177DTthe code7178NNcode ,7179,, Section7180NPSection 61107181CD@card@ (7182(( k7183NNk )7184)) (7185(( 37186LS3 )7187)) of7188INof Title7189NPTitle 267190CD@card@ ,7191,, Congress7192NPCongress has7193VHZhave said7194VVNsay ,7195,, unless7196INunless the7197DTthe Secretary7198NPSecretary otherwise7199RBotherwise establishes7200VVZestablish by7201INby regulations7202NNSregulation ,7203,, a7204DTa written7205JJwritten determination7206NNdetermination may7207MDmay not7208RBnot be7209VBbe used7210VVNuse or7211CCor cited7212VVNcite as7213INas precedent7214NNprecedent ,7215,, which7216WDTwhich is7217VBZbe probably7218RBprobably why7219WRBwhy that7220DTthat Technical7221NPTechnical Advice7222NPAdvice Memorandum7223NPMemorandum is7224VBZbe n't7225RBn't cited7226VVNcite in7227INin the7228DTthe Solicitor7229NPSolicitor General7230NPGeneral 's7231POS's brief7232NNbrief ,7233,, although7234INalthough counsel7235NNcounsel today7236NNtoday has7237VHZhave invoked7238VVNinvoke that7239IN/thatthat as7240INas supposed7241VVNsuppose authority7242NNauthority .7243SENT. But7244CCbut I7245PPI would7246MDwould point7247VVpoint out7248RPout ,7249,, secondly7250RBsecondly ,7251,, that7252IN/thatthat this7253DTthis TAM7254NNtam ,7255,, this7256DTthis 19807257CD@card@ reference7258NNreference ,7259,, concerns7260VVZconcern a7261DTa version7262NNversion of7263INof the7264DTthe statute7265NNstatute that7266IN/thatthat no7267DTno longer7268RBRlonger exists7269VVZexist .7270SENT. It7271PPit was7272VBDbe part7273NNpart of7274INof the7275DTthe statute7276NNstatute ...7277:... it7278PPit was7279VBDbe construing7280VVGconstrue a7281DTa statute7282NNstatute that7283WDTthat was7284VBDbe in7285INin effect7286NNeffect up7287RPup until7288INuntil 19757289CD@card@ .7290SENT. And7291CCand ,7292,, Justice7293NPJustice Kavanaugh7294NPKavanaugh ,7295,, you7296PPyou 're7297VBPbe correct7298JJcorrect ,7299,, at7300INat that7301DTthat time7302NNtime ,7303,, that7304WDTthat 's7305VBZbe when7306WRBwhen the7307DTthe time7308NNtime lost7309VVDlose language7310NNlanguage was7311VBDbe taken7312VVNtake out7313RPout of7314INof the7315DTthe statute7316NNstatute .7317SENT. That7318DTthat 19807319CD@card@ TAM7320NNtam was7321VBDbe construing7322VVGconstrue the7323DTthe previous7324JJprevious version7325NNversion of7326INof the7327DTthe statute7328NNstatute that7329WDTthat does7330VVZdo n't7331RBn't exist7332VVexist anymore7333RBanymore .7334SENT. So7335RBso ,7336,, for7337INfor purposes7338NNSpurpose of7339INof understanding7340VVGunderstand where7341WRBwhere there7342EXthere has7343VHZhave been7344VBNbe consistency7345NNconsistency or7346CCor inconsistency7347NNinconsistency ,7348,, there7349EXthere 's7350VHZhave been7351VBNbe rank7352JJrank inconsistency7353NNinconsistency because7354INbecause the7355DTthe IRS7356NPIRS has7357VHZhave ...7358:... has7359VHZhave said7360VVNsay different7361JJdifferent things7362NNSthing in7363INin different7364JJdifferent means7365NNSmean that7366WDTthat are7367VBPbe entitled7368VVNentitle to7369TOto different7370JJdifferent levels7371NNSlevel of7372INof respect7373NNrespect .7374SENT. And7375CCand so7376RBso ...7377:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]7378LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Why7379WRBwhy ...7380:... why7381WRBwhy do7382VVPdo you7383PPyou think7384VVPthink the7385DTthe language7386NNlanguage was7387VBDbe taken7388VVNtake out7389RPout ?7390SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]7391LOC[MR. FREDERICK] I7392PPI think7393VVPthink it7394PPit ...7395:... there7396RBthere ...7397:... it7398PPit 's7399VBZbe actually7400RBactually a7401DTa good7402JJgood question7403NNquestion ,7404,, Justice7405NPJustice Ginsburg7406NPGinsburg .7407SENT. The7408DTthe intimation7409NNintimation in7410INin the7411DTthe railroad7412NNrailroad 's7413POS's brief7414NNbrief here7415RBhere is7416VBZbe that7417IN/thatthat the7418DTthe railroad7419NNrailroad thought7420VVDthink it7421PPit would7422MDwould be7423VBbe easier7424JJReasy to7425TOto administer7426VVadminister without7427INwithout having7428VHGhave that7429DTthat language7430NNlanguage .7431SENT. But7432CCbut there7433EXthere is7434VBZbe no7435DTno ...7436:... there7437EXthere are7438VBPbe no7439DTno statements7440NNSstatement of7441INof or7442CCor legislative7443JJlegislative history7444NNhistory that7445WDTthat would7446MDwould suggest7447VVsuggest exactly7448RBexactly why7449WRBwhy .7450SENT. One7451CDOne theory7452NNtheory could7453MDcould be7454VBbe that7455IN/thatthat the7456DTthe reason7457NNreason why7458WRBwhy the7459DTthe time7460NNtime lost7461VVNlose language7462NNlanguage had7463VHDhave been7464VBNbe added7465VVNadd was7466VBDbe to7467TOto implement7468VVimplement what7469WPwhat was7470VBDbe called7471VVNcall the7472DTthe Washington7473NPWashington agreement7474NNagreement in7475INin the7476DTthe late7477JJlate '7478POS' 30s7479NNS30s .7480SENT. And7481CCand the7482DTthe Washington7483NPWashington agreement7484NNagreement was7485VBDbe a7486DTa deal7487NNdeal struck7488VVDstrike between7489INbetween rail7490NNrail labor7491NNlabor and7492CCand the7493DTthe railroads7494NNSrailroad with7495INwith the7496DTthe idea7497NNidea of7498INof treating7499VVGtreat what7500WPwhat was7501VBDbe going7502VVGgo on7503INon at7504INat the7505DTthe time7506NNtime in7507INin the7508DTthe industry7509NNindustry of7510INof a7511DTa lot7512NNlot of7513INof unsettle7514VVunsettle ...7515:... unsettlement7516NNunsettlement ,7517,, where7518WRBwhere workers7519NNSworker who7520WPwho had7521VHDhave been7522VBNbe working7523VVGwork for7524INfor one7525CDone railroad7526NNrailroad were7527VBDbe part7528NNpart of7529INof ...7530:... got7531VVDget caught7532VVNcatch up7533RPup in7534INin the7535DTthe mergers7536NNSmerger .7537SENT. They7538PPthey lost7539VVDlose the7540DTthe ability7541NNability to7542TOto maintain7543VVmaintain higher-paying7544JJhigher-paying jobs7545NNSjob .7546SENT. And7547CCand the7548DTthe Washington7549NPWashington agreement7550NNagreement was7551VBDbe to7552TOto deal7553VVdeal with7554INwith what7555WPwhat were7556VBDbe called7557VVNcall displacement7558NNdisplacement allowances7559NNSallowance .7560SENT. These7561DTthese displacement7562NNdisplacement allowances7563NNSallowance were7564VBDbe defined7565VVNdefine to7566TOto be7567VBbe time7568NNtime lost7569VVNlose in7570INin that7571DTthat era7572NNera .7573SENT. And7574CCand it7575PPit could7576MDcould very7577RBvery well7578RBwell have7579VHPhave been7580VBNbe that7581IN/thatthat ,7582,, by7583INby the7584DTthe 1970s7585NNS1970s ,7586,, this7587DTthis whole7588JJwhole reason7589NNreason for7590INfor that7591DTthat concept7592NNconcept had7593VHDhave ...7594:... was7595VBDbe no7596RBno longer7597RBRlonger in7598INin effect7599NNeffect .7600SENT. Now7601RBnow the7602DTthe issue7603NNissue in7604INin that7605DTthat 19807606CD@card@ technical7607JJtechnical advice7608NNadvice memorandum7609NNmemorandum ...7610:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7611LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well7612UHwell ,7613,, it7614PPit 's7615VBZbe because7616INbecause the7617DTthe time7618NNtime allocation7619NNallocation was7620VBDbe changed7621VVNchange .7622SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]7623LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Well7624UHwell ,7625,, you7626PPyou 're7627VBPbe talking7628VVGtalk about7629RBabout ...7630:... you7631PPyou 're7632VBPbe ...7633:... I7634PPI think7635VVPthink you7636PPyou 're7637VBPbe making7638VVGmake reference7639NNreference ,7640,, Your7641PP$your Honor7642NPHonor ,7643,, to7644TOto the7645DTthe paid7646VVNpay versus7647CCversus earned7648VVNearn ...7649:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7650LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Yes7651NPYes .7652SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]7653LOC[MR. FREDERICK] ...7654:... distinction7655NNdistinction ?7656SENT? [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7657LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Yes7658NPYes .7659SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]7660LOC[MR. FREDERICK] But7661CCbut that7662DTthat ...7663:... whether7664INwhether the7665DTthe timing7666NNtiming thing7667NNthing had7668VHDhave happened7669VVNhappen as7670INas a7671DTa change7672NNchange did7673VVDdo n't7674RBn't affect7675VVaffect what7676WPwhat was7677VBDbe being7678VBGbe taxed7679VVNtax ,7680,, which7681WDTwhich was7682VBDbe services7683NNSservice rendered7684VVDrender .7685SENT. So7686RBso whether7687INwhether you7688PPyou tax7689NNtax ...7690:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7691LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I7692PPI understand7693VVPunderstand that7694RBthat .7695SENT. But7696CCbut it7697PPit changed7698VVDchange ...7699:... you7700PPyou did7701VVDdo n't7702RBn't need7703VVneed the7704DTthe language7705NNlanguage anymore7706RBanymore ,7707,, is7708VBZbe ...7709:... is7710VBZbe the7711DTthe argument7712NNargument ,7713,, right7714RBright ?7715SENT? The7716DTthe "7717``" time7718NNtime lost7719VVNlose "7720``" language7721NNlanguage anymore7722RBanymore ...7723:... because7724INbecause the7725DTthe ...7726:... the7727DTthe allocation7728NNallocation had7729VHDhave changed7730VVNchange ?7731SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]7732LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Well7733UHWell ...7734:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7735LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] At7736INat least7737JJSleast that7738DTthat 's7739VBZbe the7740DTthe argument7741NNargument .7742SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]7743LOC[MR. FREDERICK] ...7744:... their7745PP$their argument7746NNargument goes7747VVZgo beyond7748INbeyond that7749DTthat ,7750,, Justice7751NPJustice Kavanaugh7752NPKavanaugh ,7753,, and7754CCand that7755DTthat 's7756VBZbe when7757WRBwhen they7758PPthey are7759VBPbe saying7760VVGsay that7761IN/thatthat the7762DTthe words7763NNSword "7764``" including7765VVGinclude time7766NNtime lost7767VVNlose "7768``" somehow7769RBsomehow make7770VVmake "7771``" services7772NNSservice rendered7773VVDrender "7774``" mean7775VVmean not7776RBnot services7777NNSservice rendered7778VVNrender because7779INbecause time7780NNtime lost7781VVNlose is7782VBZbe somehow7783RBsomehow an7784DTan example7785NNexample or7786CCor an7787DTan illustration7788NNillustration of7789INof the7790DTthe concept7791NNconcept of7792INof services7793NNSservice rendered7794VVNrender .7795SENT. As7796INas a7797DTa matter7798NNmatter of7799INof plain7800JJplain English7801NPEnglish ,7802,, that7803WDTthat makes7804VVZmake absolutely7805RBabsolutely no7806DTno sense7807NNsense .7808SENT. And7809CCand we7810PPwe 've7811VHPhave given7812VVNgive a7813DTa bunch7814NNbunch of7815INof statutory7816JJstatutory examples7817NNSexample in7818INin our7819PP$our brief7820NNbrief of7821INof where7822WRBwhere Congress7823NPCongress would7824MDwould use7825VVuse the7826DTthe word7827NNword "7828``" including7829VVGinclude "7830''" to7831TOto be7832VBbe additive7833JJadditive ,7834,, like7835INlike in7836INin the7837DTthe Longshore7838NPLongshore Act7839NPAct ,7840,, where7841WRBwhere the7842DTthe situs7843NNsitus requirement7844NNrequirement is7845VBZbe imposed7846VVNimpose on7847INon the7848DTthe navigable7849JJnavigable waters7850NNSwater ,7851,, including7852VVGinclude piers7853NNSpier .7854SENT. Now7855RBnow I7856PPI do7857VVPdo n't7858RBn't think7859VVthink anybody7860NNanybody in7861INin this7862DTthis room7863NNroom today7864NNtoday would7865MDwould think7866VVthink that7867IN/thatthat a7868DTa pier7869NNpier is7870VBZbe a7871DTa navigable7872JJnavigable water7873NNwater ,7874,, but7875CCbut yet7876RByet that7877DTthat 's7878VBZbe how7879WRBhow Congress7880NPCongress chose7881VVDchoose to7882TOto express7883VVexpress itself7884PPitself .7885SENT. And7886CCand it7887PPit ...7888:... and7889CCand I7890PPI would7891MDwould submit7892VVsubmit that7893IN/thatthat the7894DTthe idea7895NNidea of7896INof time7897NNtime lost7898VVNlose under7899INunder no7900DTno reasonable7901JJreasonable understanding7902NNunderstanding of7903INof the7904DTthe English7905JJEnglish language7906NNlanguage would7907MDwould be7908VBbe services7909NNSservice rendered7910VVNrender either7911RBeither .7912SENT. So7913RBso what7914WPwhat you7915PPyou 're7916VBPbe left7917VVNleave with7918INwith here7919RBhere is7920VBZbe what7921WPwhat the7922DTthe Eighth7923JJeighth Circuit7924NNcircuit deemed7925VVNdeem to7926TOto be7927VBbe a7928DTa very7929RBvery clear7930JJclear statute7931NNstatute where7932WRBwhere the7933DTthe taxation7934NNtaxation that7935WDTthat was7936VBDbe sought7937VVNseek to7938TOto be7939VBbe imposed7940VVNimpose here7941RBhere was7942VBDbe on7943INon a7944DTa ...7945:... an7946DTan FELA7947NPFela judgment7948NNjudgment rather7949RBrather than7950INthan on7951INon what7952WPwhat services7953NNSservice were7954VBDbe rendered7955VVNrender .7956SENT. And7957CCand one7958CDone other7959JJother note7960NNnote about7961INabout the7962DTthe Eighth7963JJeighth Circuit7964NNcircuit panel7965NNpanel .7966SENT. This7967DTthis Court7968NPCourt ,7969,, in7970INin Wisconsin7971NPWisconsin Central7972NPCentral just7973RBjust last7974JJlast term7975NNterm ,7976,, construed7977VVDconstrue the7978DTthe earlier7979JJRearly part7980NNpart of7981INof that7982DTthat provision7983NNprovision ,7984,, the7985DTthe money7986NNmoney remuneration7987NNremuneration .7988SENT. The7989DTthe Eighth7990JJeighth Circuit7991NNcircuit panel7992NNpanel that7993WDTthat decided7994VVDdecide this7995DTthis case7996NNcase also7997RBalso had7998VHDhave decided7999VVNdecide a8000DTa case8001NNcase called8002VVDcall Union8003NPUnion Pacific8004NPPacific ,8005,, which8006WDTwhich handled8007VVDhandle the8008DTthe exact8009JJexact question8010NNquestion at8011INat issue8012NNissue in8013INin Wisconsin8014NPWisconsin Central8015NPCentral ,8016,, and8017CCand decided8018VVDdecide it8019PPit correctly8020RBcorrectly ,8021,, as8022INas this8023DTthis Court8024NPCourt opined8025VVDopine .8026SENT. It8027PPit was8028VBDbe the8029DTthe same8030JJsame panel8031NNpanel that8032WDTthat handled8033VVDhandle both8034DTboth issues8035NNSissue .8036SENT. And8037CCand this8038DTthis Court8039NPCourt cited8040VVDcite with8041INwith approval8042NNapproval the8043DTthe Union8044NPUnion Pacific8045NPPacific decision8046NNdecision .8047SENT. Now8048RBnow we8049PPwe ...8050:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8051LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I8052PPI thought8053VVDthink a8054DTa key8055JJkey move8056NNmove in8057INin the8058DTthe Eighth8059JJeighth Circuit8060NPCircuit decision8061NNdecision was8062VBDbe interpreting8063VVGinterpret Nierotko8064NPNierotko ,8065,, and8066CCand then8067RBthen it8068PPit said8069VVDsay we8070PPwe recently8071RBrecently determined8072VVDdetermine that8073IN/thatthat that8074DTthat definition8075NNdefinition can8076MDcan 't8077RB't be8078VBbe imported8079VVNimport into8080INinto the8081DTthe RRTA8082NPRRTA because8083INbecause the8084DTthe FICA8085NPFICA tax8086NNtax is8087VBZbe payment8088NNpayment for8089INfor employment8090NNemployment ,8091,, which8092WDTwhich is8093VBZbe defined8094VVNdefine broadly8095RBbroadly .8096SENT. But8097CCbut ,8098,, in8099INin fact8100NNfact ,8101,, Nierotko8102NPNierotko does8103VVZdo go8104VVgo to8105TOto services8106NNSservice performed8107VVNperform ,8108,, which8109WDTwhich is8110VBZbe equivalent8111JJequivalent ,8112,, the8113DTthe argument8114NNargument is8115VBZbe ,8116,, to8117TOto services8118NNSservice rendered8119VVNrender .8120SENT. So8121RBso how8122WRBhow do8123VVPdo you8124PPyou respond8125VVrespond to8126TOto that8127DTthat part8128NNpart when8129WRBwhen you8130PPyou rely8131VVPrely on8132INon the8133DTthe Eighth8134JJeighth Circuit8135NNcircuit so8136RBso specifically8137RBspecifically ?8138SENT? That8139DTthat sentence8140NNsentence jumps8141VVZjump out8142RPout at8143INat me8144PPme .8145SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]8146LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Well8147UHWell ,8148,, again8149RBagain ,8150,, it8151PPit goes8152VVZgo to8153TOto the8154DTthe difference8155NNdifference between8156INbetween benefits8157NNSbenefit and8158CCand taxes8159NNStaxis and8160CCand the8161DTthe asymmetry8162NNasymmetry there8163RBthere .8164SENT. If8165INif you8166PPyou were8167VBDbe to8168TOto take8169VVtake ...8170:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8171LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] That8172DTthat 's8173VBZbe not8174RBnot what8175WPwhat they8176PPthey were8177VBDbe relying8178VVGrely on8179INon .8180SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]8181LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Well8182UHWell ,8183,, no8184UHno ,8185,, but8186CCbut what8187WPwhat they8188PPthey were8189VBDbe ...8190:... what8191WPwhat ...8192:... I8193PPI think8194VVPthink that8195IN/thatthat what8196WPwhat ...8197:... they8198PPthey were8199VBDbe actually8200RBactually relying8201VVGrely on8202INon the8203DTthe fact8204NNfact that8205IN/thatthat there8206EXthere is8207VBZbe an8208DTan asymmetry8209NNasymmetry between8210INbetween benefits8211NNSbenefit and8212CCand taxation8213NNtaxation .8214SENT. And8215CCand if8216INif you8217PPyou take8218VVPtake that8219DTthat asymmetry8220NNasymmetry ...8221:... let8222NNlet 's8223VBZbe ...8224:... let8225VVlet 's8226VBZbe just8227RBjust play8228VVplay this8229DTthis out8230INout a8231DTa little8232JJlittle bit8233NNbit .8234SENT. If8235INif you8236PPyou 're8237VBPbe a8238DTa rail8239NNrail worker8240NNworker and8241CCand you8242PPyou work8243VVPwork for8244INfor four8245CDfour years8246NNSyear and8247CCand 118248CD@card@ months8249NNSmonth ,8250,, you8251PPyou paid8252VVDpay your8253PP$your RRTA8254NPRRTA taxes8255NNStaxis ,8256,, you8257PPyou do8258VVPdo not8259RBnot qualify8260VVqualify for8261INfor benefits8262NNSbenefit under8263INunder the8264DTthe Railroad8265NPRailroad Retirement8266NPRetirement Act8267NPAct because8268INbecause you8269PPyou have8270VHPhave n't8271RBn't hit8272VVNhit the8273DTthe first8274JJfirst five-year8275JJfive-year threshold8276NNthreshold .8277SENT. So8278RBso it8279PPit is8280VBZbe clear8281JJclear from8282INfrom that8283DTthat example8284NNexample that8285IN/thatthat there8286EXthere 's8287VBZbe an8288DTan asymmetry8289NNasymmetry between8290INbetween the8291DTthe taxing8292VVGtax provision8293NNprovision on8294INon the8295DTthe one8296CDone hand8297NNhand and8298CCand the8299DTthe benefits8300NNSbenefit provision8301NNprovision on8302INon the8303DTthe other8304JJother hand8305NNhand .8306SENT. Justice8307NPJustice Kagan8308NPKagan ,8309,, you8310PPyou mentioned8311VVDmention the8312DTthe idea8313NNidea of8314INof just8315RBjust starting8316VVGstart out8317RPout .8318SENT. Imagine8319VVimagine the8320DTthe system8321NNsystem as8322INas it8323PPit was8324VBDbe ...8325:... existed8326VVNexist in8327INin 19378328CD@card@ ,8329,, where8330WRBwhere you8331PPyou had8332VHDhave literally8333RBliterally thousands8334NNSthousand of8335INof railmen8336NNSrailmen who8337WPwho were8338VBDbe retiring8339VVGretire or8340CCor unable8341JJunable to8342TOto work8343VVwork and8344CCand they8345PPthey were8346VBDbe now8347RBnow all8348RBall of8349INof a8350DTa sudden8351JJsudden getting8352VVGget benefits8353NNSbenefit ,8354,, but8355CCbut there8356EXthere were8357VBDbe no8358DTno tax8359NNtax revenues8360NNSrevenue at8361INat that8362DTthat time8363NNtime that8364WDTthat was8365VBDbe sufficient8366JJsufficient to8367TOto pay8368VVpay the8369DTthe benefits8370NNSbenefit .8371SENT. So8372RBso there8373EXthere 's8374VBZbe always8375RBalways been8376VBNbe an8377DTan asymmetry8378NNasymmetry between8379INbetween the8380DTthe taxing8381VVGtax provision8382NNprovision and8383CCand the8384DTthe benefits8385NNSbenefit provision8386NNprovision .8387SENT. And8388CCand what8389WPwhat they8390PPthey 're8391VBPbe seeking8392VVGseek to8393TOto do8394VVdo is8395VBZbe to8396TOto bootstrap8397NNbootstrap the8398DTthe words8399NNSword that8400WDTthat are8401VBPbe in8402INin the8403DTthe benefits8404NNSbenefit provision8405NNprovision that8406IN/thatthat no8407DTno longer8408RBRlonger exist8409VVexist in8410INin the8411DTthe taxing8412VVGtax provision8413NNprovision and8414CCand to8415TOto give8416VVgive those8417DTthose words8418NNSword meaning8419VVGmean where8420WRBwhere Congress8421NPCongress intentionally8422RBintentionally deleted8423VVDdelete those8424DTthose words8425NNSword .8426SENT. Now8427RBnow ,8428,, if8429INif I8430PPI could8431MDcould talk8432VVtalk for8433INfor a8434DTa moment8435NNmoment ,8436,, Justice8437NPJustice Sotomayor8438NPSotomayor ,8439,, about8440INabout your8441PP$your administrability8442NNadministrability problem8443NNproblem .8444SENT. There8445EXthere absolutely8446RBabsolutely is8447VBZbe a8448DTa problem8449NNproblem with8450INwith a8451DTa general8452JJgeneral verdict8453NNverdict because8454INbecause ,8455,, in8456INin many8457JJmany states8458NNSstate ,8459,, there8460EXthere are8461VBPbe general8462JJgeneral verdict8463NNverdict forms8464NNSform and8465CCand this8466DTthis award8467NNaward would8468MDwould be8469VBbe for8470INfor all8471DTall manner8472NNmanner of8473INof things8474NNSthing .8475SENT. But8476CCbut the8477DTthe administrability8478NNadministrability problems8479NNSproblem actually8480RBactually go8481VVPgo a8482DTa little8483JJlittle bit8484NNbit further8485RBRfurther than8486INthan that8487DTthat ,8488,, because8489RBbecause ,8490,, in8491INin the8492DTthe case8493NNcase of8494INof Norfolk8495NPNorfolk and8496CCand Western8497NPWestern versus8498CCversus Liepelt8499NPLiepelt ,8500,, which8501WDTwhich we8502PPwe cite8503VVPcite in8504INin our8505PP$our brief8506NNbrief but8507CCbut the8508DTthe other8509JJother side8510NNside does8511VVZdo not8512RBnot ,8513,, this8514DTthis Court8515NPCourt held8516VVDhold that8517IN/thatthat juries8518NNSjury are8519VBPbe required8520VVNrequire to8521TOto give8522VVgive ...8523:... be8524VBbe given8525VVNgive instructions8526NNSinstruction that8527IN/thatthat the8528DTthe awards8529NNSaward that8530WDTthat they8531PPthey give8532VVPgive under8533INunder the8534DTthe FELA8535NPFela are8536VBPbe not8537RBnot subject8538JJsubject to8539TOto income8540NNincome tax8541NNtax .8542SENT. Why8543WRBwhy is8544VBZbe that8545IN/thatthat important8546JJimportant ?8547SENT? The8548DTthe railroad8549NNrailroad asked8550VVDask for8551INfor that8552DTthat instruction8553NNinstruction in8554INin the8555DTthe Liepelt8556NPLiepelt case8557NNcase because8558INbecause it8559PPit did8560VVDdo n't8561RBn't want8562VVwant juries8563NNSjury inflating8564VVGinflate awards8565NNSaward because8566INbecause the8567DTthe jury8568NNjury would8569MDwould understand8570VVunderstand that8571IN/thatthat if8572INif a8573DTa ...8574:... a8575DTa cache8576NNcache of8577INof money8578NNmoney is8579VBZbe being8580VBGbe paid8581VVNpay out8582RPout to8583TOto the8584DTthe worker8585NNworker ,8586,, it8587PPit would8588MDwould be8589VBbe subject8590JJsubject to8591TOto tax8592NNtax .8593SENT. And8594CCand that8595WDTthat was8596VBDbe leading8597VVGlead the8598DTthe railroad8599NNrailroad to8600TOto assert8601VVassert that8602IN/thatthat these8603DTthese awards8604NNSaward are8605VBPbe being8606VBGbe inflated8607VVNinflate improperly8608RBimproperly because8609INbecause juries8610NNSjury thought8611VVDthink that8612IN/thatthat these8613DTthese were8614VBDbe going8615VVGgo to8616TOto be8617VBbe taxable8618JJtaxable awards8619NNSaward .8620SENT. So8621INso this8622DTthis instruction8623NNinstruction is8624VBZbe given8625VVNgive in8626INin every8627DTevery ...8628:... in8629INin most8630JJSmost every8631DTevery FELA8632NPFela case8633NNcase that8634IN/thatthat I8635PPI 'm8636VBPbe aware8637JJaware of8638INof .8639SENT. And8640CCand it8641PPit was8642VBDbe given8643VVNgive in8644INin this8645DTthis one8646CDone .8647SENT. It8648PPit 's8649VBZbe in8650INin the8651DTthe Joint8652NPJoint Appendix8653NPAppendix at8654INat page8655NNpage 918656CD@card@ .8657SENT. That8658DTthat instruction8659NNinstruction given8660VVNgive to8661TOto the8662DTthe jury8663NNjury is8664VBZbe that8665IN/thatthat the8666DTthe FELA8667NPFela award8668NNaward here8669RBhere is8670VBZbe not8671RBnot going8672VVGgo to8673TOto be8674VBbe subject8675JJsubject to8676TOto income8677NNincome tax8678NNtax .8679SENT. So8680RBso you8681PPyou want8682VVPwant to8683TOto talk8684VVtalk about8685INabout administrability8686NNadministrability problems8687NNSproblem ,8688,, not8689RBnot only8690RBonly do8691VVPdo you8692PPyou have8693VHPhave a8694DTa problem8695NNproblem with8696INwith the8697DTthe general8698JJgeneral verdict8699NNverdict ,8700,, but8701CCbut you8702PPyou have8703VHPhave a8704DTa problem8705NNproblem with8706INwith what8707WPwhat would8708MDwould be8709VBbe colliding8710VVGcollide opinions8711NNSopinion of8712INof this8713DTthis Court8714NPCourt if8715INif you8716PPyou were8717VBDbe to8718TOto accept8719VVaccept what8720WPwhat the8721DTthe railroad8722NNrailroad is8723VBZbe arguing8724VVGargue for8725INfor here8726RBhere .8727SENT. On8728INon the8729DTthe one8730CDone hand8731NNhand ,8732,, the8733DTthe jury8734NNjury is8735VBZbe told8736VVNtell your8737PP$your damages8738NNSdamage verdict8739NNverdict is8740VBZbe not8741RBnot going8742VVGgo to8743TOto be8744VBbe subject8745JJsubject to8746TOto income8747NNincome tax8748NNtax ,8749,, but8750CCbut if8751INif you8752PPyou award8753VVPaward some8754DTsome part8755NNpart for8756INfor past8757JJpast earnings8758NNSearning loss8759NNloss ,8760,, that8761WDTthat will8762MDwill be8763VBbe subject8764JJsubject to8765TOto the8766DTthe RRTA8767NPRRTA tax8768NNtax .8769SENT. So8770INso the8771DTthe jury8772NNjury is8773VBZbe somehow8774RBsomehow supposed8775VVNsuppose to8776TOto figure8777VVfigure out8778RPout ,8779,, on8780INon the8781DTthe basis8782NNbasis of8783INof these8784DTthese conflicting8785JJconflicting instructions8786NNSinstruction ,8787,, how8788WRBhow much8789JJmuch to8790TOto inflate8791VVinflate the8792DTthe award8793NNaward to8794TOto cover8795VVcover the8796DTthe retirement8797NNretirement tax8798NNtax part8799NNpart of8800INof it8801PPit .8802SENT. But8803CCbut ,8804,, wait8805VVPwait ,8806,, it8807PPit gets8808VVZget more8809RBRmore complicated8810JJcomplicated than8811INthan that8812IN/thatthat because8813INbecause there8814EXthere are8815VBPbe two8816CDtwo different8817JJdifferent tax8818NNtax rates8819NNSrate for8820INfor the8821DTthe railroad8822NNrailroad retirement8823NNretirement tax8824NNtax .8825SENT. There8826EXthere 's8827VBZbe Tier8828NPTier 18829CD1 ,8830,, which8831WDTwhich are8832VBPbe more8833JJRmore or8834CCor less8835RBRless equivalent8836JJequivalent to8837TOto the8838DTthe kind8839NNkind of8840INof Social8841NPSocial Security8842NPSecurity taxes8843NNStaxis that8844IN/thatthat we8845PPwe 're8846VBPbe familiar8847JJfamiliar with8848INwith under8849INunder FICA8850NPFICA .8851SENT. But8852CCbut there8853EXthere 's8854VBZbe Tier8855NPTier 28856CD2 .8857SENT. Tier8858NPTier 28859CD2 are8860VBPbe more8861JJRmore like8862INlike private8863JJprivate pensions8864NNSpension ,8865,, and8866CCand the8867DTthe rate8868NNrate of8869INof tax8870NNtax changes8871NNSchange on8872INon that8873WDTthat every8874DTevery year8875NNyear based8876VVNbase on8877INon the8878DTthe assets8879NNSasset that8880WDTthat have8881VHPhave accumulated8882VVNaccumulate under8883INunder the8884DTthe control8885NNcontrol of8886INof the8887DTthe Railroad8888NPRailroad Retirement8889NPRetirement Board8890NPBoard .8891SENT. So8892RBso not8893RBnot only8894RBonly are8895VBPbe you8896PPyou going8897VVGgo to8898TOto be8899VBbe asking8900VVGask juries8901NNSjury to8902TOto try8903VVtry to8904TOto figure8905VVfigure out8906RPout somehow8907RBsomehow what8908WPwhat tax8909NNtax rate8910NNrate to8911TOto apply8912VVapply to8913TOto cover8914VVcover this8915DTthis little8916JJlittle sliver8917NNsliver of8918INof lost8919VVNlose wage8920NNwage earnings8921NNSearning ,8922,, but8923CCbut you8924PPyou 're8925VBPbe going8926VVGgo to8927TOto have8928VHhave to8929TOto impose8930VVimpose on8931INon courts8932NNScourt the8933DTthe duty8934NNduty of8935INof keeping8936VVGkeep track8937NNtrack every8938DTevery year8939NNyear ,8940,, as8941RBas soon8942RBsoon as8943INas the8944DTthe Railroad8945NPRailroad Retirement8946NPRetirement Board8947NPBoard resets8948VVZreset the8949DTthe rate8950NNrate for8951INfor the8952DTthe Tier8953NPTier 28954CD2 tax8955NNtax because8956INbecause ...8957:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]8958LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] You8959PPyou 're8960VBPbe speculating8961VVGspeculate that8962IN/thatthat juries8963NNSjury are8964VBPbe aware8965JJaware of8966INof railroad8967NNrailroad retirement8968NNretirement benefits8969NNSbenefit and8970CCand taxation8971NNtaxation .8972SENT. The8973DTthe ...8974:... I8975PPI think8976VVPthink you8977PPyou 're8978VBPbe quite8979RBquite right8980JJright when8981WRBwhen you8982PPyou say8983VVPsay you8984PPyou did8985VVDdo n't8986RBn't want8987VVwant to8988TOto inflate8989VVinflate verdicts8990NNSverdict to8991TOto account8992VVaccount for8993INfor income8994NNincome tax8995NNtax .8996SENT. But8997CCbut what8998WPwhat is8999VBZbe the9000DTthe likelihood9001NNlikelihood that9002IN/thatthat a9003DTa jury9004NNjury is9005VBZbe going9006VVGgo to9007TOto think9008VVthink of9009INof railroad9010NNrailroad retirement9011NNretirement benefits9012NNSbenefit ?9013SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]9014LOC[MR. FREDERICK] The9015DTthe point9016NNpoint ,9017,, Justice9018NPJustice Ginsburg9019NPGinsburg ,9020,, and9021CCand ...9022:... and9023CCand this9024DTthis is9025VBZbe where9026WRBwhere I9027PPI think9028VVPthink looking9029VVGlook again9030RBagain at9031INat this9032DTthis Court9033NPCourt 's9034POS's decision9035NNdecision in9036INin Norfolk9037NPNorfolk and9038CCand Western9039NPWestern versus9040CCversus Liepelt9041NPLiepelt is9042VBZbe instructive9043JJinstructive ,9044,, because9045RBbecause ,9046,, there9047EXthere ,9048,, if9049INif the9050DTthe ...9051:... if9052INif this9053DTthis is9054VBZbe fair9055JJfair game9056NNgame ,9057,, then9058RBthen why9059WRBwhy would9060MDwould n't9061RBn't it9062PPit be9063VBbe possible9064JJpossible for9065INfor the9066DTthe worker9067NNworker 's9068POS's lawyer9069NNlawyer to9070TOto say9071VVsay ,9072,, now9073RBnow this9074DTthis ...9075:... one9076CDone part9077NNpart of9078INof it9079PPit 's9080VBZbe going9081VVGgo to9082TOto be9083VBbe subject9084JJsubject to9085TOto tax9086NNtax ,9087,, and9088CCand ask9089VVask for9090INfor an9091DTan instruction9092NNinstruction that9093IN/thatthat the9094DTthe jury9095NNjury give9096VVgive the9097DTthe after-tax9098JJafter-tax amount9099NNamount that9100WDTthat would9101MDwould equate9102VVequate to9103TOto the9104DTthe lost9105VVNlose earnings9106NNSearning portion9107NNportion of9108INof the9109DTthe judgment9110NNjudgment .9111SENT. And9112CCand therein9113RBtherein lies9114VVZlie the9115DTthe rub9116NNrub ,9117,, Justice9118NPJustice Ginsburg9119NPGinsburg ,9120,, because9121RBbecause ,9122,, if9123INif the9124DTthe lawyers9125NNSlawyer are9126VBPbe going9127VVGgo to9128TOto be9129VBbe debating9130VVGdebate about9131RBabout how9132WRBhow the9133DTthe jury9134NNjury is9135VBZbe instructed9136VVNinstruct ,9137,, it9138PPit surely9139RBsurely is9140VBZbe fair9141JJfair game9142NNgame for9143INfor the9144DTthe jury9145NNjury to9146TOto understand9147VVunderstand exactly9148RBexactly what9149WPwhat the9150DTthe law9151NNlaw is9152VBZbe .9153SENT. And9154CCand ...9155:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9156LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] And9157CCand has9158VHZhave any9159DTany jury9160NNjury ever9161RBever been9162VBNbe instructed9163VVNinstruct ...9164:... has9165VHZhave any9166DTany railroad9167NNrailroad attorney9168NNattorney asked9169VVNask for9170INfor a9171DTa jury9172NNjury instruction9173NNinstruction about9174INabout railroad9175NNrailroad retirement9176NNretirement tax9177NNtax ?9178SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]9179LOC[MR. FREDERICK] No9180NPNo ,9181,, because9182INbecause it9183PPit 's9184VHZhave never9185RBnever been9186VBNbe taxed9187VVNtax before9188RBbefore .9189SENT. That9190DTthat 's9191VBZbe the9192DTthe whole9193JJwhole point9194NNpoint .9195SENT. This9196DTthis whole9197JJwhole idea9198NNidea came9199VVDcome up9200RBup five9201CDfive years9202NNSyear ago9203RBago when9204WRBwhen the9205DTthe BNSF9206NPBNSF Railroad9207NPRailroad asked9208VVDask the9209DTthe Railroad9210NPRailroad Retirement9211NPRetirement Board9212NPBoard for9213INfor gratuitous9214JJgratuitous advice9215NNadvice about9216RBabout whether9217INwhether or9218CCor not9219RBnot these9220DTthese awards9221NNSaward could9222MDcould be9223VBbe taxed9224VVNtax .9225SENT. And9226CCand then9227RBthen they9228PPthey started9229VVDstart up9230RPup a9231DTa process9232NNprocess of9233INof litigating9234VVGlitigate this9235DTthis issue9236NNissue .9237SENT. If9238INif you9239PPyou look9240VVPlook at9241INat all9242PDTall the9243DTthe reported9244VVNreport decisions9245NNSdecision ,9246,, they9247PPthey all9248RBall arise9249VVParise in9250INin the9251DTthe last9252JJlast couple9253NNcouple of9254INof years9255NNSyear ,9256,, notwithstanding9257INnotwithstanding the9258DTthe fact9259NNfact that9260IN/thatthat ,9261,, for9262INfor 759263CD@card@ years9264NNSyear ,9265,, from9266INfrom the9267DTthe inception9268NNinception of9269INof the9270DTthe railroad9271NNrailroad retirement9272NNretirement system9273NNsystem ,9274,, there9275EXthere were9276VBDbe ...9277:... this9278DTthis was9279VBDbe not9280RBnot an9281DTan issue9282NNissue .9283SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9284LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Well9285UHWell ,9286,, because9287INbecause it9288PPit was9289VBDbe n't9290RBn't a9291DTa ...9292:... look9293VVlook ,9294,, the9295DTthe way9296NNway I9297PPI 'm9298VBPbe thinking9299VVGthink about9300INabout it9301PPit ,9302,, and9303CCand perhaps9304RBperhaps you9305PPyou 'll9306MDwill tell9307VVtell me9308PPme my9309PP$my ...9310:... that9311IN/thatthat I9312PPI 'm9313VBPbe wrong9314JJwrong ,9315,, but9316CCbut very9317RBvery ...9318:... very9319RBvery simply9320RBsimply ,9321,, Congress9322NPCongress has9323VHZhave loads9324NNSload of9325INof statutes9326NNSstatute spending9327VVGspend money9328NNmoney .9329SENT. And9330CCand I9331PPI sort9332VVPsort of9333INof think9334NNthink ,9335,, a9336DTa lot9337NNlot of9338INof people9339NNSpeople think9340VVPthink ,9341,, what9342WPwhat they9343PPthey spend9344VVPspend money9345NNmoney on9346RBon has9347VHZhave to9348TOto be9349VBbe paid9350VVNpay for9351INfor .9352SENT. And9353CCand many9354JJmany people9355NNSpeople think9356VVPthink that9357IN/thatthat taxes9358NNStaxis is9359VBZbe a9360DTa good9361JJgood way9362NNway to9363TOto do9364VVdo it9365PPit .9366SENT. So9367RBso ,9368,, other9369JJother things9370NNSthing being9371VBGbe equal9372JJequal ...9373:... and9374CCand there9375EXthere are9376VBPbe a9377DTa lot9378NNlot of9379INof other9380JJother things9381NNSthing ...9382:... to9383TOto make9384VVmake these9385DTthese statutes9386NNSstatute work9387VVPwork in9388INin harmony9389NNharmony ,9390,, so9391RBso you9392PPyou tax9393VVPtax what9394WPwhat you9395PPyou 're9396VBPbe going9397VVGgo to9398TOto get9399VVget later9400RBRlater paid9401JJpaid for9402INfor is9403VBZbe a9404DTa virtue9405NNvirtue .9406SENT. Now9407RBnow Congress9408NPCongress suddenly9409RBsuddenly changed9410VVDchange the9411DTthe practice9412NNpractice ,9413,, in9414INin your9415PP$your view9416NNview ,9417,, because9418INbecause it9419PPit had9420VHDhave been9421VBNbe there9422RBthere since9423INsince 19379424CD@card@ ,9425,, by9426INby amending9427VVGamend these9428DTthese statutes9429NNSstatute .9430SENT. So9431RBso we9432PPwe have9433VHPhave a9434DTa slight9435JJslight virtue9436NNvirtue on9437INon one9438CDone side9439NNside which9440WDTwhich raises9441VVZraise a9442DTa question9443NNquestion .9444SENT. Why9445WRBwhy ?9446SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]9447LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Justice9448NPJustice Breyer9449NPBreyer ,9450,, let9451VVDlet me9452PPme answer9453VVanswer your9454PP$your question9455NNquestion in9456INin this9457DTthis way9458NNway :9459:: We9460PPwe 're9461VBPbe not9462RBnot here9463RBhere saying9464VVGsay that9465DTthat Mr9466NPMr .9467SENT. Loos9468NPLoos is9469VBZbe entitled9470VVNentitle to9471TOto benefits9472NNSbenefit that9473IN/thatthat he9474PPhe has9475VHZhave n't9476RBn't paid9477VVNpay for9478INfor .9479SENT. He9480PPhe does9481VVZdo n't9482RBn't want9483VVwant the9484DTthe ...9485:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9486LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No9487RBno ,9488,, I9489PPI understand9490VVPunderstand that9491RBthat .9492SENT. But9493CCbut you9494PPyou also9495RBalso understand9496VVPunderstand the9497DTthe asymmetry9498NNasymmetry argument9499NNargument .9500SENT. And9501CCand there9502EXthere are9503VBPbe other9504JJother asymmetries9505NNSasymmetry ,9506,, of9507INof course9508NNcourse .9509SENT. I9510PPI 'm9511VBPbe just9512RBjust saying9513VVGsay ...9514:... I9515PPI do9516VVPdo n't9517RBn't want9518VVwant to9519TOto repeat9520VVrepeat myself9521PPmyself .9522SENT. I9523PPI 'm9524VBPbe just9525RBjust saying9526VVGsay my9527PP$my real9528JJreal question9529NNquestion here9530RBhere ...9531:... and9532CCand I9533PPI ...9534:... I9535PPI wanted9536VVDwant you9537PPyou to9538TOto get9539VVget narrow9540JJnarrow on9541INon it9542PPit and9543CCand that9544DTthat 's9545VBZbe why9546WRBwhy I9547PPI asked9548VVDask it9549PPit ...9550:... why9551WRBwhy ?9552SENT? Why9553WRBwhy would9554MDwould Congress9555NPCongress ...9556:... did9557VVDdo Congress9558NPCongress want9559VVPwant to9560TOto change9561VVchange it9562PPit ?9563SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]9564LOC[MR. FREDERICK] I9565PPI think9566VVPthink that9567DTthat ...9568:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9569LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] In9570INin your9571PP$your view9572NNview .9573SENT. [MR. FREDERICK]9574LOC[MR. FREDERICK] In9575INin my9576PP$my view9577NNview ,9578,, the9579DTthe reason9580NNreason ...9581:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9582LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] We9583PPwe 've9584VHPhave been9585VBNbe quiet9586JJquiet about9587INabout it9588PPit ,9589,, by9590INby the9591DTthe way9592NNway ,9593,, nobody9594NNnobody saying9595VVGsay a9596DTa word9597NNword ...9598:... [MR. FREDERICK]9599LOC[MR. FREDERICK] Right9600NPRight .9601SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9602LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But9603CCbut ...9604:... and9605CCand it9606PPit being9607VBGbe nearly9608RBnearly years9609NNSyear and9610CCand years9611NNSyear and9612CCand years9613NNSyear of9614INof the9615DTthe other9616JJother thing9617NNthing ,9618,, and9619CCand then9620RBthen they9621PPthey suddenly9622RBsuddenly changed9623VVDchange it9624PPit ,9625,, and9626CCand in9627INin your9628PP$your view9629NNview ,9630,, why9631WRBwhy ?9632SENT? [MR. FREDERICK]9633LOC[MR. FREDERICK] I9634PPI think9635VVPthink the9636DTthe reason9637NNreason is9638VBZbe that9639IN/thatthat it9640PPit had9641VHDhave very9642RBvery little9643RBlittle practical9644JJpractical effect9645NNeffect because9646INbecause taxes9647NNStaxis were9648VBDbe not9649RBnot being9650VBGbe generated9651VVNgenerate on9652INon these9653DTthese awards9654NNSaward ,9655,, and9656CCand there9657EXthere was9658VBDbe no9659DTno real9660JJreal question9661NNquestion about9662INabout the9663DTthe benefits9664NNSbenefit that9665WDTthat were9666VBDbe ...9667:... that9668WDTthat were9669VBDbe accruing9670VVGaccrue .9671SENT. In9672INin most9673JJSmost instances9674NNSinstance ,9675,, the9676DTthe only9677JJonly time9678NNtime when9679WRBwhen the9680DTthe benefits9681NNSbenefit side9682NNside actually9683RBactually matters9684VVZmatter for9685INfor these9686DTthese awards9687NNSaward is9688VBZbe when9689WRBwhen you9690PPyou can9691MDcan allocate9692VVallocate dollars9693NNSdollar for9694INfor a9695DTa few9696JJfew months9697NNSmonth in9698INin order9699NNorder to9700TOto get9701VVget beyond9702INbeyond the9703DTthe 20-year9704JJ20-year threshold9705NNthreshold or9706CCor the9707DTthe 30-year9708JJ30-year threshold9709NNthreshold .9710SENT. It9711PPit does9712VVZdo n't9713RBn't happen9714VVhappen very9715RBvery often9716RBoften .9717SENT. And9718CCand it9719PPit ...9720:... when9721WRBwhen it9722PPit does9723VVZdo happen9724VVhappen ,9725,, a9726DTa practice9727NNpractice has9728VHZhave developed9729VVNdevelop where9730WRBwhere the9731DTthe worker9732NNworker actually9733RBactually pays9734VVZpay for9735INfor those9736DTthose topped-up9737JJtopped-up months9738NNSmonth .9739SENT. So9740RBso take9741VVtake ,9742,, for9743INfor instance9744NNinstance ,9745,, a9746DTa worker9747NNworker who9748WPwho 's9749VHZhave got9750VVNget 199751CD@card@ years9752NNSyear and9753CCand 109754CD@card@ months9755NNSmonth of9756INof service9757NNservice .9758SENT. He9759PPhe gets9760VVZget hurt9761VVNhurt on9762INon the9763DTthe job9764NNjob .9765SENT. It9766PPit 's9767VBZbe the9768DTthe railroad9769NNrailroad 's9770POS's fault9771NNfault .9772SENT. He9773PPhe gets9774VVZget his9775PP$his FA9776NNfa ...9777:... FELA9778NNFELA judgment9779NNjudgment .9780SENT. What9781WPWhat that9782DTthat 19809783CD@card@ tax9784NNtax memorandum9785NNmemorandum was9786VBDbe talking9787VVGtalk about9788RBabout ,9789,, the9790DTthe employee9791NNemployee went9792VVDgo forward9793RBforward and9794CCand said9795VVDsay :9796:: I9797PPI 'm9798VBPbe willing9799JJwilling to9800TOto pay9801VVpay my9802PP$my taxes9803NNStaxis .9804SENT. I9805PPI 'd9806MDwould like9807VVlike to9808TOto get9809VVget credit9810NNcredit for9811INfor two9812CDtwo months9813NNSmonth so9814RBso that9815IN/thatthat I9816PPI can9817MDcan get9818VVget my9819PP$my 209820CD@card@ years9821NNSyear for9822INfor my9823PP$my service9824NNservice .9825SENT. And9826CCand the9827DTthe IRS9828NPIRS said9829VVDsay :9830:: That9831WDTthat 's9832VBZbe okay9833JJokay .9834SENT. And9835CCand that9836WDTthat had9837VHDhave been9838VBNbe the9839DTthe way9840NNway the9841DTthe statute9842NNstatute was9843VBDbe worded9844VVNword between9845INbetween 19469846CD@card@ and9847CCand 19759848CD@card@ .9849SENT. Now9850RBnow I9851PPI understand9852VVPunderstand that9853IN/thatthat ,9854,, since9855INsince 19759856CD@card@ ,9857,, this9858DTthis informal9859JJinformal practice9860NNpractice has9861VHZhave continued9862VVNcontinue .9863SENT. It9864PPit 's9865VBZbe not9866RBnot used9867VVNuse very9868RBvery often9869RBoften .9870SENT. But9871CCbut we9872PPwe 're9873VBPbe not9874RBnot talking9875VVGtalk about9876INabout a9877DTa situation9878NNsituation where9879WRBwhere you9880PPyou 've9881VHPhave got9882VVNget workers9883NNSworker that9884WDTthat are9885VBPbe out9886RBout there9887RBthere getting9888VVGget benefits9889NNSbenefit based9890VVNbase on9891INon these9892DTthese judgments9893NNSjudgment because9894INbecause the9895DTthe judgments9896NNSjudgment typically9897RBtypically do9898VVPdo n't9899RBn't allocate9900VVallocate to9901TOto particular9902JJparticular months9903NNSmonth .9904SENT. And9905CCand if9906INif you9907PPyou do9908VVPdo not9909RBnot allocate9910VVallocate the9911DTthe back-pay9912NNback-pay award9913NNaward to9914TOto particular9915JJparticular months9916NNSmonth ,9917,, then9918RBthen the9919DTthe Railroad9920NPRailroad Retirement9921NPRetirement Board9922NPBoard does9923VVZdo n't9924RBn't have9925VHhave a9926DTa basis9927NNbasis for9928INfor saying9929VVGsay how9930WRBhow you9931PPyou count9932VVPcount it9933PPit up9934RPup toward9935INtoward the9936DTthe ...9937:... the9938DTthe creditable9939JJcreditable service9940NNservice .9941SENT. And9942CCand because9943INbecause the9944DTthe way9945NNway the9946DTthe benefits9947NNSbenefit work9948VVPwork ,9949,, it9950PPit does9951VVZdo n't9952RBn't typically9953RBtypically benefit9954VVbenefit you9955PPyou to9956TOto have9957VHhave 189958CD@card@ years9959NNSyear of9960INof service9961NNservice or9962CCor 179963CD@card@ years9964NNSyear of9965INof service9966NNservice .9967SENT. You9968PPyou 've9969VHPhave got9970VVNget to9971TOto get9972VVget to9973TOto 209974CD@card@ years9975NNSyear now9976RBnow in9977INin order9978NNorder to9979TOto get9980VVget to9981TOto a9982DTa new9983JJnew threshold9984NNthreshold .9985SENT. This9986DTthis matter9987NNmatter as9988INas a9989DTa practical9990JJpractical thing9991NNthing ,9992,, Justice9993NPJustice Breyer9994NPBreyer ,9995,, simply9996RBsimply was9997VBDbe not9998RBnot deemed9999VVNdeem to10000TOto be10001VBbe so10002RBso significant10003JJsignificant as10004RBas to10005TOto affect10006VVaffect things10007NNSthing .10008SENT. I10009PPI would10010MDwould further10011RBRfurther point10012VVpoint out10013RPout ,10014,, as10015INas the10016DTthe Board10017NPBoard ,10018,, the10019DTthe Railroad10020NPRailroad Retirement10021NPRetirement Board10022NPBoard 's10023POS's latest10024JJSlate annual10025JJannual report10026NNreport indicates10027VVZindicate ,10028,, the10029DTthe retirement10030NNretirement system10031NNsystem is10032VBZbe going10033VVGgo to10034TOto be10035VBbe solvent10036JJsolvent for10037INfor the10038DTthe next10039JJnext 2910040CD@card@ years10041NNSyear .10042SENT. You10043PPyou 've10044VHPhave got10045VVNget to10046TOto ask10047VVask the10048DTthe question10049NNquestion :10050:: What10051WPWhat difference10052NNdifference does10053VVZdo it10054PPit make10055VVmake whether10056INwhether or10057CCor not10058RBnot you10059PPyou impose10060VVimpose the10061DTthe tax10062NNtax ,10063,, except10064INexcept as10065INas a10066DTa means10067NNmeans of10068INof altering10069VVGalter the10070DTthe bargaining10071NNbargaining leverage10072NNleverage between10073INbetween the10074DTthe railroads10075NNSrailroad and10076CCand their10077PP$their workers10078NNSworker ,10079,, when10080WRBwhen the10081DTthe railroads10082NNSrailroad have10083VHPhave breached10084VVNbreach the10085DTthe duty10086NNduty of10087INof due10088JJdue care10089NNcare and10090CCand caused10091VVNcause injury10092NNinjury to10093TOto their10094PP$their workers10095NNSworker .10096SENT. If10097INif the10098DTthe Court10099NPCourt has10100VHZhave nothing10101NNnothing further10102RBRfurther ,10103,, we10104PPwe 'll10105MDwill submit10106VVsubmit .10107SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]10108LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank10109VVthank you10110PPyou ,10111,, counsel10112NNcounsel .10113SENT. Five10114CDFive minutes10115NNSminute ,10116,, Ms10117NNMs .10118SENT. Blatt10119NPBlatt .10120SENT.

[MS. BLATT]10121LOC[MS. BLATT] Thank10122VVthank you10123PPyou ,10124,, Mr10125NPMr .10126SENT. Chief10127NPChief Justice10128NPJustice ,10129,, and10130CCand may10131MDmay it10132PPit please10133VVplease the10134DTthe Court10135NPCourt :10136:: Justice10137NPJustice Ginsburg10138NPGinsburg ,10139,, on10140INon your10141PP$your jury10142NNjury instruction10143NNinstruction point10144NNpoint ,10145,, I10146PPI ...10147:... I10148PPI do10149VVPdo n't10150RBn't think10151VVthink there10152EXthere 's10153VBZbe anything10154NNanything in10155INin the10156DTthe history10157NNhistory of10158INof American10159JJAmerican jurisprudence10160NNjurisprudence that10161IN/thatthat you10162PPyou get10163VVPget a10164DTa instruction10165NNinstruction under10166INunder FICA10167NPFICA that10168IN/thatthat you10169PPyou get10170VVPget to10171TOto tell10172VVtell the10173DTthe jury10174NNjury to10175TOto gross-up10176NNgross-up .10177SENT. So10178RBso I10179PPI just10180RBjust do10181VVPdo n't10182RBn't know10183VVknow where10184WRBwhere in10185INin law10186NNlaw they10187PPthey think10188VVPthink you10189PPyou 'd10190MDwould be10191VBbe even10192RBeven entitled10193VVNentitle to10194TOto that10195DTthat instruction10196NNinstruction .10197SENT. Second10198RBsecond ,10199,, Justice10200NPJustice Kavanaugh10201NPKavanaugh ,10202,, in10203INin terms10204NNSterm of10205INof the10206DTthe Nierotko10207NPNierotko ,10208,, Quality10209NPQuality Stores10210NPSStores was10211VBDbe a10212DTa ...10213:... was10214VBDbe the10215DTthe FICA10216NPFICA side10217NNside .10218SENT. And10219CCand ,10220,, also10221RBalso ,10222,, Justice10223NPJustice ...10224:... Justice10225NPJustice ...10226:... Justice10227NPJustice Scalia10228NPScalia signed10229VVDsign Quality10230NPQuality Stores10231NPSStores .10232SENT. So10233RBso I10234PPI do10235VVPdo think10236VVthink that10237IN/thatthat that10238DTthat relates10239VVZrelate to10240TOto ...10241:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10242LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well10243UHWell ,10244,, what10245WPwhat do10246VVPdo we10247PPwe do10248VVPdo ...10249:... you10250PPyou say10251VVPsay that10252IN/thatthat there10253EXthere 's10254VBZbe no10255DTno basis10256NNbasis for10257INfor a10258DTa jury10259NNjury instruction10260NNinstruction to10261TOto gross-up10262NNgross-up ,10263,, but10264CCbut it10265PPit ...10266:... it10267PPit sounds10268VVZsound like10269INlike there10270EXthere 's10271VBZbe for10272INfor a10273DTa long10274JJlong time10275NNtime been10276VBNbe a10277DTa jury10278NNjury instruction10279NNinstruction requiring10280VVGrequire the10281DTthe jury10282NNjury to10283TOto ...10284:... to10285TOto net-down10286NNnet-down .10287SENT. [MS. BLATT]10288LOC[MS. BLATT] Right10289NPRight ,10290,, and10291CCand ...10292:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10293LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Is10294VBZbe n't10295RBn't what10296WPwhat 's10297VBZbe good10298JJgood for10299INfor the10300DTthe goose10301NNgoose good10302JJgood for10303INfor the10304DTthe gander10305NNgander on10306INon this10307DTthis ?10308SENT? [MS. BLATT]10309LOC[MS. BLATT] Sure10310NPSure ,10311,, if10312INif someone10313NNsomeone wants10314VVZwant to10315TOto argue10316VVargue it10317PPit .10318SENT. No10319DTno court10320NNcourt has10321VHZhave bought10322VVNbuy it10323PPit .10324SENT. But10325CCbut I10326PPI think10327VVPthink the10328DTthe reason10329NNreason why10330WRBwhy in10331INin Liepelt10332NPLiepelt is10333VBZbe because10334INbecause there10335EXthere was10336VBDbe like10337INlike a10338DTa ,10339,, I10340PPI do10341VVPdo n't10342RBn't know10343VVknow ,10344,, percent10345NNpercent increase10346NNincrease for10347INfor inflation10348NNinflation because10349INbecause taxes10350NNStaxis make10351VVPmake up10352RPup ,10353,, like10354VVlike ,10355,, 3010356CD@card@ ,10357,, 4010358CD@card@ percent10359NNpercent ,10360,, and10361CCand so10362RBso the10363DTthe Court10364NPCourt said10365VVDsay you10366PPyou 're10367VBPbe entitled10368VVNentitle to10369TOto this10370DTthis instruction10371NNinstruction .10372SENT. But10373CCbut just10374RBjust remember10375VVremember there10376EXthere are10377VBPbe jury10378NNjury verdicts10379NNSverdict every10380DTevery day10381NNday that10382WDTthat are10383VBPbe subject10384JJsubject to10385TOto both10386DTboth income10387NNincome taxes10388NNStaxis and10389CCand FICA10390NPFICA taxes10391NNStaxis .10392SENT. And10393CCand I10394PPI just10395RBjust have10396VHPhave never10397RBnever seen10398VVNsee a10399DTa case10400NNcase where10401WRBwhere you10402PPyou 're10403VBPbe entitled10404VVNentitle to10405TOto ...10406:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10407LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] What10408WPWhat ...10409:... what10410WPwhat do10411VVPdo you10412PPyou say10413VVPsay to10414TOto Mr10415NPMr .10416SENT. Frederick10417NPFrederick 's10418POS's point10419NNpoint that10420IN/thatthat the10421DTthe reason10422NNreason why10423WRBwhy the10424DTthe ...10425:... the10426DTthe railroad10427NNrailroad 's10428VBZbe so10429RBso interested10430JJinterested in10431INin this10432DTthis is10433VBZbe to10434TOto increase10435VVincrease its10436PP$its leverage10437NNleverage in10438INin settlement10439NNsettlement negotiations10440NNSnegotiation ,10441,, where10442WRBwhere the10443DTthe parties10444NNSparty can10445MDcan allocate10446VVallocate awards10447NNSaward ,10448,, and10449CCand ...10450:... and10451CCand here10452RBhere you10453PPyou 're10454VBPbe arguing10455VVGargue pretty10456RBpretty strenuously10457RBstrenuously that10458IN/thatthat they10459PPthey should10460MDshould n't10461RBn't be10462VBbe able10463JJable to10464TOto ...10465:... to10466TOto ...10467:... to10468TOto ...10469:... to10470TOto be10471VBbe ...10472:... to10473TOto take10474VVtake into10475INinto cognizance10476NNcognizance the10477DTthe tax10478NNtax issue10479NNissue on10480INon ...10481:... in10482INin ...10483:... in10484INin a10485DTa jury10486NNjury judgment10487NNjudgment ?10488SENT? [MS. BLATT]10489LOC[MS. BLATT] Right10490NPRight .10491SENT. I10492PPI ...10493:... I10494PPI mean10495VVPmean ,10496,, I10497PPI ...10498:... I10499PPI told10500VVDtell you10501PPyou why10502WRBwhy we10503PPwe 're10504VBPbe here10505RBhere .10506SENT. It10507PPit is10508VBZbe not10509RBnot to10510TOto gain10511VVgain leverage10512NNleverage .10513SENT. The10514DTthe one10515CDone thing10516NNthing I10517PPI did10518VVDdo n't10519RBn't say10520VVsay ,10521,, or10522CCor I10523PPI thought10524VVDthink I10525PPI said10526VVDsay ,10527,, but10528CCbut apparently10529RBapparently I10530PPI did10531VVDdo n't10532RBn't ,10533,, was10534VBDbe that10535IN/thatthat the10536DTthe railroads10537NNSrailroad are10538VBPbe very10539RBvery concerned10540VVNconcern that10541IN/thatthat the10542DTthe rates10543NNSrate are10544VBPbe going10545VVGgo to10546TOto go10547VVgo up10548RPup .10549SENT. If10550INif there10551EXthere 's10552VBZbe a10553DTa mismatch10554NNmismatch ,10555,, they10556PPthey 're10557VBPbe directly10558RBdirectly ...10559:... you10560PPyou know10561VVPknow ,10562,, they10563PPthey pay10564VVPpay two-thirds10565NNStwo-third of10566INof any10567DTany rate10568NNrate increase10569NNincrease .10570SENT. But10571CCbut ,10572,, on10573INon the10574DTthe settlement10575NNsettlement leverage10576NNleverage ,10577,, whatever10578WDTwhatever you10579PPyou think10580VVPthink happens10581VVZhappen about10582INabout allocation10583NNallocation ...10584:... and10585CCand this10586DTthis goes10587VVZgo to10588TOto you10589PPyou ,10590,, Justice10591NPJustice Sotomayor10592NPSotomayor ...10593:... regardless10594RBregardless of10595INof what10596WPwhat you10597PPyou do10598VVPdo in10599INin this10600DTthis case10601NNcase ,10602,, 23110603CD@card@ for10604INfor the10605DTthe benefits10606NNSbenefit side10607NNside requires10608VVZrequire allocation10609NNallocation in10610INin every10611DTevery case10612NNcase for10613INfor personal10614JJpersonal injury10615NNinjury judgment10616NNjudgment .10617SENT. Now10618RBnow ,10619,, if10620INif we10621PPwe prevail10622VVPprevail ,10623,, whatever10624WDTwhatever happens10625VVZhappen in10626INin terms10627NNSterm of10628INof allocation10629NNallocation on10630INon the10631DTthe taxing10632VVGtax side10633NNside ,10634,, it10635PPit is10636VBZbe treated10637VVNtreat with10638INwith parity10639NNparity on10640INon the10641DTthe benefits10642NNSbenefit side10643NNside .10644SENT. And10645CCand that10646WDTthat is10647VBZbe to10648TOto say10649VVsay ,10650,, if10651INif employees10652NNSemployee are10653VBPbe underreporting10654VVGunderreport their10655PP$their taxes10656NNStaxis ,10657,, they10658PPthey 're10659VBPbe going10660VVGgo to10661TOto get10662VVget an10663DTan underreporting10664VVGunderreport in10665INin benefits10666NNSbenefit .10667SENT. If10668INif they10669PPthey win10670VVPwin ,10671,, there10672EXthere is10673VBZbe no10674DTno downside10675NNdownside ,10676,, and10677CCand the10678DTthe law10679NNlaw allows10680VVZallow them10681PPthem to10682TOto allocate10683VVallocate an10684DTan entire10685JJentire award10686NNaward to10687TOto the10688DTthe benefits10689NNSbenefit side10690NNside ,10691,, without10692INwithout any10693DTany tax10694NNtax burden10695NNburden .10696SENT. So10697RBso I10698PPI think10699VVPthink we10700PPwe win10701VVwin in10702INin terms10703NNSterm of10704INof the10705DTthe dynamic10706NNdynamic to10707TOto the10708DTthe net10709JJnet benefit10710NNbenefit on10711INon Treasury10712NPTreasury .10713SENT. If10714INif you10715PPyou 're10716VBPbe worried10717VVNworry about10718INabout settlement10719NNsettlement dynamics10720NNSdynamics ,10721,, I10722PPI mean10723VVPmean ,10724,, that10725WDTthat is10726VBZbe because10727INbecause of10728INof the10729DTthe h10730NNh ...10731:... h10732NNh (10733(( 210734CD2 )10735)) ,10736,, h10737NNh (10738(( 210739CD2 )10740)) ,10741,, yes10742UHyes ,10743,, in10744INin 23110745CD@card@ allows10746VVZallow employees10747NNSemployee to10748TOto allocate10749VVallocate .10750SENT. The10751DTthe third10752JJthird thing10753NNthing ,10754,, I10755PPI do10756VVPdo want10757VVwant to10758TOto defend10759VVdefend the10760DTthe government10761NNgovernment here10762RBhere ,10763,, because10764RBbecause ...10765:... about10766INabout this10767DTthis 198110768CD@card@ TAM10769NNtam .10770SENT. The10771DTthe reason10772NNreason probably10773RBprobably the10774DTthe government10775NNgovernment did10776VVDdo n't10777RBn't cite10778VVcite it10779PPit is10780VBZbe because10781INbecause it10782PPit was10783VBDbe n't10784RBn't until10785INuntil the10786DTthe red10787JJred brief10788NNbrief that10789WDTthat made10790VVDmake all10791PDTall this10792DTthis huge10793JJhuge thing10794NNthing about10795RBabout ,10796,, oh10797UHoh ,10798,, years10799NNSyear and10800CCand 8010801CD@card@ years10802NNSyear ,10803,, so10804RBso ,10805,, I10806PPI mean10807VVPmean ,10808,, the10809DTthe government10810NNgovernment was10811VBDbe n't10812RBn't aware10813JJaware it10814PPit was10815VBDbe going10816VVGgo to10817TOto be10818VBbe accused10819VVNaccuse of10820INof any10821DTany of10822INof this10823RBthis when10824WRBwhen they10825PPthey had10826VHDhave a10827DTa regulation10828NNregulation on10829INon point10830NNpoint that10831WDTthat said10832VVDsay any10833DTany amounts10834NNSamount paid10835VVNpay for10836INfor time10837NNtime lost10838VVDlose .10839SENT. So10840RBso we10841PPwe cited10842VVDcite it10843PPit in10844INin our10845PP$our brief10846NNbrief .10847SENT. And10848CCand also10849RBalso ,10850,, on10851INon the10852DTthe time10853NNtime lost10854VVDlose ,10855,, the10856DTthe bottom10857JJbottom line10858NNline of10859INof where10860WRBwhere I10861PPI want10862VVPwant to10863TOto end10864VVend ,10865,, I10866PPI mean10867VVPmean ,10868,, the10869DTthe problem10870NNproblem for10871INfor the10872DTthe other10873JJother side10874NNside ,10875,, whatever10876WDTwhatever he10877PPhe wants10878VVZwant to10879TOto say10880VVsay about10881INabout the10882DTthe language10883NNlanguage ,10884,, he10885PPhe concedes10886VVZconcede time10887NNtime lost10888VVDlose payments10889NNSpayment are10890VBPbe covered10891VVNcover .10892SENT. I10893PPI mean10894VVPmean ,10895,, one10896CDone part10897NNpart of10898INof his10899PP$his argument10900NNargument ,10901,, he10902PPhe fought10903VVDfight it10904PPit .10905SENT. In10906INin another10907DTanother part10908NNpart of10909INof the10910DTthe argument10911NNargument ,10912,, he10913PPhe has10914VHZhave to10915TOto concede10916VVconcede it10917PPit because10918INbecause he10919PPhe concedes10920VVZconcede that10921IN/thatthat vacation10922NNvacation pay10923NNpay ,10924,, sickness10925NNsickness ,10926,, I10927PPI mean10928VVPmean ,10929,, whether10930INwhether or10931CCor not10932RBnot he10933PPhe wants10934VVZwant to10935TOto admit10936VVadmit it10937PPit ,10938,, you10939PPyou do10940VVPdo n't10941RBn't work10942VVwork on10943INon Christmas10944NPChristmas Day10945NPDay ,10946,, and10947CCand that10948WDTthat 's10949VBZbe considered10950VVNconsider time10951NNtime lost10952VVDlose ,10953,, and10954CCand you10955PPyou ...10956:... that10957WDTthat 's10958VBZbe for10959INfor services10960NNSservice rendered10961VVNrender .10962SENT. So10963INso the10964DTthe only10965JJonly thing10966NNthing ,10967,, what10968WDTwhat his10969PP$his case10970NNcase comes10971VVZcome down10972RPdown to10973TOto is10974VBZbe whether10975INwhether a10976DTa negligence10977NNnegligence judgment10978NNjudgment is10979VBZbe somehow10980RBsomehow different10981JJdifferent from10982INfrom the10983DTthe type10984NNtype of10985INof payments10986NNSpayment that10987IN/thatthat he10988PPhe concedes10989VVZconcede .10990SENT. And10991CCand we10992PPwe do10993VVPdo n't10994RBn't think10995VVthink there10996EXthere 's10997VBZbe any10998DTany textual10999JJtextual or11000CCor purposeful11001JJpurposeful and11002CCand ,11003,, you11004PPyou know11005VVPknow ,11006,, in11007INin any11008DTany event11009NNevent ,11010,, I11011PPI hate11012VVPhate to11013TOto cite11014VVcite it11015PPit ,11016,, but11017CCbut I11018PPI will11019MDwill end11020VVend with11021INwith Chevron11022NPChevron .11023SENT. I11024PPI mean11025VVPmean ,11026,, he11027PPhe has11028VHZhave to11029TOto win11030VVwin under11031INunder the11032DTthe plain11033JJplain language11034NNlanguage for11035INfor you11036PPyou to11037TOto affirm11038VVaffirm .11039SENT. Thank11040VVthank you11041PPyou .11042SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11043LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank11044VVthank you11045PPyou ,11046,, Ms11047NNMs .11048SENT. Blatt11049NPBlatt .11050SENT. Counsel11051NNcounsel ,11052,, the11053DTthe case11054NNcase is11055VBZbe submitted11056VVNsubmit .11057SENT.