[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We2PPwe
'll3MDwill
hear4VVhear
argument5NNargument
next6JJnext
in7INin
Case8NPCase
17-10429CD@card@
,10,,
BNSF11NPBNSF
Railway12NPRailway
Company13NPCompany
versus14CCversus
Loos15NPLoos
.16SENT.
Ms17NNMs
.18SENT.
Blatt19NPBlatt
.20SENT.
[MS. BLATT]21LOC[MS. BLATT]
Justice22NPJustice
Breyer's23NPBreyer's
...24:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]25LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
He26PPhe
'll27MDwill
be28VBbe
back29RBback
.30SENT.
[MS. BLATT]31LOC[MS. BLATT]
Okay32NPOkay
.33SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]34LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank35VVthank
you36PPyou
,37,,
though38RBthough
.39SENT.
[40SYM[
LAUGHTER41NNlaughter
]42SYM]
[MS. BLATT]43LOC[MS. BLATT]
Thank44VVthank
you45PPyou
,46,,
Mr47NPMr
.48SENT.
Chief49NPChief
Justice50NPJustice
,51,,
and52CCand
may53MDmay
it54PPit
please55VVplease
the56DTthe
Court57NPCourt
:58::
For59INfor
three60CDthree
reasons61NNSreason
,62,,
payment63NNpayment
by64INby
an65DTan
employer66NNemployer
to67TOto
an68DTan
employee69NNemployee
for70INfor
lost71VVNlose
wages72NNSwage
under73INunder
FELA74NPFela
is75VBZbe
compensation76NNcompensation
under77INunder
Section78NPSection
323179CD@card@
(80((
e81LSe
)82))
(83((
184LS1
)85))
of86INof
the87DTthe
Railroad88NPRailroad
Retirement89NPRetirement
Tax90NPTax
Act91NPAct
,92,,
or93CCor
RRTA94NPRRTA
.95SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]96LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Ms97NNMs
.98SENT.
Blatt99NPBlatt
,100,,
before101INbefore
you102PPyou
launch103VVlaunch
into104INinto
that105DTthat
,106,,
can107MDcan
you108PPyou
tell109VVtell
us110PPus
why111WRBwhy
the112DTthe
railroad113NNrailroad
cares114VVZcare
?115SENT?
I116PPI
mean117VVPmean
,118,,
if119INif
he120PPhe
does121VVZdo
n't122RBn't
...123:...
if124INif
it125PPit
's126VBZbe
not127RBnot
...128:...
he129PPhe
's130VBZbe
not131RBnot
subject132JJsubject
to133TOto
the134DTthe
tax135NNtax
,136,,
neither137CCneither
is138VBZbe
the139DTthe
employer140NNemployer
.141SENT.
So142RBso
what143WPwhat
...144:...
what145WPwhat
is146VBZbe
the147DTthe
stake148NNstake
that149IN/thatthat
you150PPyou
have151VHPhave
in152INin
this153DTthis
?154SENT?
[MS. BLATT]155LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure156NPSure
.157SENT.
I158PPI
mean159VVPmean
,160,,
although161INalthough
the162DTthe
...163:...
the164DTthe
Respondent165NNrespondent
argues166VVZargue
that167IN/thatthat
the168DTthe
employer169NNemployer
is170VBZbe
subject171JJsubject
on172INon
his173PP$his
fallback174NNfallback
,175,,
but176CCbut
generally177RBgenerally
to178TOto
answer179VVanswer
your180PP$your
question181NNquestion
,182,,
the183DTthe
employer184NNemployer
cares185VVZcare
because186INbecause
under187INunder
a188DTa
system189NNsystem
that190WDTthat
would191MDwould
credit192VVcredit
all193DTall
lost194JJlost
wage195NNwage
FELA196NPFela
awards197VVZaward
to198TOto
retirement199NNretirement
benefits200NNSbenefit
but201CCbut
without202INwithout
any203DTany
...204:...
any205DTany
tax206NNtax
burden207NNburden
has208VHZhave
a209DTa
long-term210JJlong-term
risk211NNrisk
of212INof
insolvency213NNinsolvency
or214CCor
instability215NNinstability
to216TOto
the217DTthe
system218NNsystem
.219SENT.
So220RBso
there221EXthere
's222VBZbe
a223DTa
short-term224JJshort-term
savings225NNSsaving
to226TOto
be227VBbe
sure228JJsure
,229,,
and230CCand
,231,,
generally232RBgenerally
,233,,
people234NNSpeople
do235VVPdo
n't236RBn't
like237VVlike
to238TOto
pay239VVpay
taxes240NNStaxis
for241INfor
the242DTthe
sake243NNsake
of244INof
taxes245NNStaxis
,246,,
but247CCbut
the248DTthe
entire249JJentire
purpose250NNpurpose
of251INof
this252DTthis
Tax253NPTax
Act254NPAct
is255VBZbe
to256TOto
fund257VVfund
the258DTthe
retirement259NNretirement
benefits260NNSbenefit
for261INfor
railroad262NNrailroad
employees263NNSemployee
,264,,
and265CCand
pensions266NNSpension
are267VBPbe
good268JJgood
for269INfor
the270DTthe
railroads271NNSrailroad
.272SENT.
So273RBso
that274DTthat
's275VBZbe
the276DTthe
answer277NNanswer
.278SENT.
If279INif
I280PPI
could281MDcould
get282VVget
to283TOto
the284DTthe
...285:...
the286DTthe
three287CDthree
reasons288NNSreason
.289SENT.
First290NPFirst
...291:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]292LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But293CCbut
there294EXthere
's295VBZbe
no296RBno
personal297JJpersonal
...298:...
[MS. BLATT]299LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure300RBsure
.301SENT.
Sorry302RBsorry
.303SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]304LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
There305EXthere
's306VBZbe
no307DTno
personal308JJpersonal
interest309NNinterest
in310INin
the311DTthe
sense312NNsense
of313INof
,314,,
if315INif
we316PPwe
say317VVPsay
that318IN/thatthat
it319PPit
's320VBZbe
not321RBnot
,322,,
then323RBthen
the324DTthe
railroad325NNrailroad
does326VVZdo
n't327RBn't
withhold328VVwithhold
and329CCand
pay330VVpay
the331DTthe
state332NNstate
.333SENT.
Did334VVDdo
you335PPyou
in336INin
this337DTthis
case338NNcase
?339SENT?
You340PPyou
wanted341VVDwant
a342DTa
credit343NNcredit
against344INagainst
the345DTthe
award346NNaward
,347,,
but348CCbut
did349VVDdo
you350PPyou
,351,,
in352INin
fact353NNfact
,354,,
pay355NNpay
anything356NNanything
,357,,
any358DTany
federal359JJfederal
taxes360NNStaxis
beforehand361RBbeforehand
?362SENT?
[MS. BLATT]363LOC[MS. BLATT]
Yes364NPYes
.365SENT.
So366INso
all367DTall
$368$$
9,000369CD@card@
has370VHZhave
been371VBNbe
paid372VVNpay
.373SENT.
The374DTthe
$375$$
6,000376CD@card@
portion377NNportion
of378INof
the379DTthe
employer380NNemployer
share381NNshare
was382VBDbe
paid383VVNpay
,384,,
and385CCand
$386$$
3,000387CD@card@
was388VBDbe
withheld389VVNwithhold
from390INfrom
the391DTthe
payment392NNpayment
of393INof
the394DTthe
FELA395NPFela
award396NNaward
to397TOto
account398VVaccount
for399INfor
the400DTthe
employee401NNemployee
's402POS's
share403NNshare
.404SENT.
And405CCand
the406DTthe
railroad407NNrailroad
...408:...
and409CCand
the410DTthe
reason411NNreason
why412WRBwhy
the413DTthe
dispute414NNdispute
came415VVDcome
up416RPup
is417VBZbe
the418DTthe
railroad419NNrailroad
wants420VVZwant
an421DTan
offset422VVNoffset
for423INfor
the424DTthe
$425$$
3,000426CD@card@
that427WDTthat
should428MDshould
have429VHhave
been430VBNbe
withheld431VVNwithhold
from432INfrom
the433DTthe
railroad434NNrailroad
employee435NNemployee
.436SENT.
So437RBso
...438:...
get439VVget
to440TOto
the441DTthe
statutory442JJstatutory
text443NNtext
and444CCand
the445DTthe
first446JJfirst
reason447NNreason
is448VBZbe
the449DTthe
statutory450JJstatutory
text451NNtext
and452CCand
structure453NNstructure
make454VVPmake
clear455JJclear
that456IN/thatthat
such457PDTsuch
a458DTa
payment459NNpayment
is460VBZbe
for461INfor
services462NNSservice
rendered463VVNrender
and464CCand
that465IN/thatthat
employees466NNSemployee
need467MDneed
not468RBnot
be469VBbe
in470INin
active471JJactive
service472NNservice
to473TOto
pay474VVpay
for475INfor
services476NNSservice
rendered477VVNrender
.478SENT.
Second479RBsecond
,480,,
a481DTa
payment482NNpayment
for483INfor
lost484VVNlose
wages485NNSwage
under486INunder
FELA487NPFela
is488VBZbe
no489RBno
different490JJdifferent
from491INfrom
the492DTthe
worker493NNworker
's494POS's
compensation495NNcompensation
,496,,
sickness497NNsickness
,498,,
and499CCand
disability500NNdisability
pay501VVPpay
that502IN/thatthat
Respondent503NNrespondent
agrees504VVZagree
count505NNcount
as506INas
compensation507NNcompensation
.508SENT.
And509CCand
,510,,
third511JJthird
,512,,
taxing513VVGtax
a514DTa
payment515NNpayment
for516INfor
lost517VVNlose
wages518NNSwage
under519INunder
FELA520NPFela
furthers521VVZfurther
the522DTthe
RRTA523NPRRTA
's524POS's
purpose525NNpurpose
to526TOto
fund527VVfund
benefits528NNSbenefit
under529INunder
the530DTthe
Railroad531NPRailroad
Retirement532NPRetirement
Act533NPAct
,534,,
or535CCor
RRA536NPRRA
.537SENT.
First538RBfirst
,539,,
a540DTa
payment541NNpayment
for542INfor
lost543VVNlose
wages544NNSwage
under545INunder
FELA546NPFela
is547VBZbe
remuneration548NNremuneration
paid549VVNpay
for550INfor
services551NNSservice
rendered552VVNrender
as553INas
an554DTan
employee555NNemployee
under556INunder
subsection557NNsubsection
(558((
e559NNe
)560))
-1561CD@card@
.562SENT.
A563DTa
payment564NNpayment
for565INfor
lost566VVNlose
wages567NNSwage
under568INunder
FELA569NPFela
compensates570VVZcompensate
the571DTthe
employee572NNemployee
because573INbecause
he574PPhe
rendered575VVDrender
services576NNSservice
up577RPup
and578CCand
until579INuntil
the580DTthe
time581NNtime
of582INof
injury583NNinjury
.584SENT.
Indeed585RBindeed
,586,,
by587INby
definition588NNdefinition
,589,,
an590DTan
employee591NNemployee
cannot592MDcan
recover593VVrecover
lost594VVNlose
wages595NNSwage
under596INunder
FELA597NPFela
unless598INunless
he599PPhe
had600VHDhave
been601VBNbe
rendering602VVGrender
services603NNSservice
at604INat
the605DTthe
time606NNtime
of607INof
injury608NNinjury
.609SENT.
Additionally610RBadditionally
,611,,
this612DTthis
Court613NPCourt
in614INin
Nierotko615NPNierotko
and616CCand
Quality617NPQuality
Stores618NPSStores
interpreted619VVDinterpret
virtually620RBvirtually
identical621JJidentical
language622NNlanguage
under623INunder
the624DTthe
Social625NPSocial
Security626NPSecurity
Act627NPAct
and628CCand
FICA629NPFICA
.630SENT.
There631RBthere
,632,,
this633DTthis
Court634NPCourt
interpreted635VVDinterpret
the636DTthe
phrase637NNphrase
which638WDTwhich
defined639VVDdefine
wages640NNSwage
for641INfor
services642NNSservice
performed643VVNperform
includes644VVZinclude
all645DTall
compensation646NNcompensation
paid647VVNpay
for648INfor
the649DTthe
employment650NNemployment
relationship651NNrelationship
.652SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]653LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Your654PP$your
opposing655JJopposing
counsel656NNcounsel
argues657VVZargue
that658IN/thatthat
Nierotko659NPNierotko
is660VBZbe
discredited661VVNdiscredit
,662,,
that663IN/thatthat
that664DTthat
case665NNcase
did666VVDdo
n't667RBn't
follow668VVfollow
the669DTthe
text670NNtext
;671:;
we672PPwe
should673MDshould
n't674RBn't
follow675VVfollow
that676DTthat
methodology677NNmethodology
here678RBhere
.679SENT.
Can680MDcan
you681PPyou
respond682VVrespond
to683TOto
that684DTthat
?685SENT?
[MS. BLATT]686LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure687NPSure
.688SENT.
Respondent689NNrespondent
argues690VVZargue
that691IN/thatthat
it692PPit
's693VBZbe
discredited694VVNdiscredit
under695INunder
Cleveland696NPCleveland
Indians697NPSIndians
for698INfor
the699DTthe
very700RBvery
last701JJlast
portion702NNportion
of703INof
Nierotko704NPNierotko
,705,,
which706WDTwhich
has707VHZhave
nothing708NNnothing
to709TOto
do710VVdo
with711INwith
the712DTthe
question713NNquestion
here714RBhere
.715SENT.
So716RBso
the717DTthe
very718RBvery
last719JJlast
two720CDtwo
paragraphs721NNSparagraph
of722INof
Nierotko723NPNierotko
said724VVDsay
that725IN/thatthat
you726PPyou
credit727VVPcredit
the728DTthe
amount729NNamount
of730INof
lost731VVNlose
wages732NNSwage
in733INin
the734DTthe
...735:...
in736INin
the737DTthe
period738NNperiod
for739INfor
which740WDTwhich
they741PPthey
're742VBPbe
earned743VVNearn
.744SENT.
And745CCand
then746RBthen
Cleveland747NPCleveland
Indians748NPSIndians
came749VVDcome
along750INalong
and751CCand
the752DTthe
IRS753NPIRS
said754VVDsay
,755,,
yeah756RByeah
,757,,
we758PPwe
know759VVPknow
that760IN/thatthat
,761,,
but762CCbut
we763PPwe
want764VVPwant
to765TOto
credit766VVcredit
FICA767NPFICA
in768INin
the769DTthe
period770NNperiod
paid771VVDpay
.772SENT.
And773CCand
so774RBso
,775,,
in776INin
the777DTthe
opinion778NNopinion
for779INfor
the780DTthe
Court781NPCourt
,782,,
Cleveland783NPCleveland
Indians784NPSIndians
said785VVDsay
we786PPwe
recognize787VVPrecognize
that788IN/thatthat
the789DTthe
two790CDtwo
should791MDshould
go792VVgo
in793INin
tandem794NNtandem
,795,,
but796CCbut
we797PPwe
're798VBPbe
going799VVGgo
to800TOto
defer801VVdefer
to802TOto
the803DTthe
IRS804NPIRS
,805,,
IRS806NPIRS
's807POS's
allocation808NNallocation
.809SENT.
And810CCand
,811,,
here812RBhere
,813,,
there814EXthere
's815VBZbe
a816DTa
much817RBmuch
more818RBRmore
substantive819JJsubstantive
distinction820NNdistinction
because821INbecause
the822DTthe
employee823NNemployee
wants824VVZwant
all825PDTall
the826DTthe
benefits827NNSbenefit
under828INunder
the829DTthe
benefits830NNSbenefit
statute831NNstatute
but832CCbut
none833NNnone
of834INof
the835DTthe
ability836NNability
.837SENT.
But838CCbut
I839PPI
think840VVPthink
your841PP$your
other842JJother
question843NNquestion
went844VVDgo
to845TOto
the846DTthe
discreditedness847NNdiscreditedness
.848SENT.
I849PPI
think850VVPthink
you851PPyou
mean852VVPmean
somehow853RBsomehow
in854INin
1946855CD@card@
the856DTthe
Court857NNcourt
was858VBDbe
n't859RBn't
reading860VVGread
the861DTthe
text862NNtext
.863SENT.
I864PPI
think865VVPthink
that866DTthat
...867:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]868LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
That869DTthat
's870VBZbe
their871PP$their
argument872NNargument
.873SENT.
[MS. BLATT]874LOC[MS. BLATT]
I875PPI
think876VVPthink
that877DTthat
's878VBZbe
their879PP$their
argument880NNargument
and881CCand
I882PPI
think883VVPthink
it884PPit
's885VBZbe
certainly886RBcertainly
wrong887JJwrong
.888SENT.
We889PPwe
fit890VVPfit
the891DTthe
plain892JJplain
language893NNlanguage
because894INbecause
the895DTthe
employee896NNemployee
rendered897VVDrender
services898NNSservice
,899,,
and900CCand
nothing901NNnothing
in902INin
the903DTthe
text904NNtext
says905VVZsay
that906IN/thatthat
you907PPyou
can908MDcan
't909RB't
be910VBbe
paid911VVNpay
for912INfor
periods913NNSperiod
of914INof
time915NNtime
when916WRBwhen
you917PPyou
're918VBPbe
not919RBnot
in920INin
active921JJactive
services922NNSservice
because923INbecause
you924PPyou
rendered925VVDrender
services926NNSservice
.927SENT.
But928CCbut
the929DTthe
Court930NPCourt
purported931VVDpurport
to932TOto
be933VBbe
interpreting934VVGinterpret
the935DTthe
phrase936NNphrase
"937''"
services938NNSservice
performed939VVDperform
,940,,
"941``"
and942CCand
you943PPyou
can944MDcan
say945VVsay
pragmatically946RBpragmatically
,947,,
but948CCbut
I949PPI
think950VVPthink
it951PPit
's952VBZbe
also953RBalso
textually954RBtextually
,955,,
that956IN/thatthat
when957WRBwhen
you958PPyou
have959VHPhave
an960DTan
employment961NNemployment
relationship962NNrelationship
and963CCand
you964PPyou
compensate965VVPcompensate
the966DTthe
employee967NNemployee
,968,,
that969WDTthat
's970VBZbe
generally971RBgenerally
for972INfor
services973NNSservice
performed974VVNperform
.975SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]976LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well977UHWell
,978,,
counsel979NNcounsel
,980,,
when981WRBwhen
I982PPI
think983VVPthink
of984INof
wages985NNSwage
for986INfor
services987NNSservice
performed988VVNperform
...989:...
and990CCand
maybe991RBmaybe
it992PPit
's993VBZbe
too994RBtoo
simplistic995JJsimplistic
...996:...
but997CCbut
I998PPI
...999:...
[MS. BLATT]1000LOC[MS. BLATT]
I1001PPI
doubt1002VVPdoubt
it1003PPit
.1004SENT.
[1005SYM[
LAUGHTER1006NNlaughter
]1007SYM]
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1008LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
We1009PPwe
'll1010MDwill
see1011VVsee
.1012SENT.
I1013PPI
...1014:...
I1015PPI
...1016:...
I1017PPI
think1018VVPthink
of1019INof
it1020PPit
as1021INas
the1022DTthe
compensation1023NNcompensation
that1024IN/thatthat
an1025DTan
...1026:...
an1027DTan
employer1028NNemployer
voluntarily1029RBvoluntarily
gives1030VVZgive
the1031DTthe
employee1032NNemployee
.1033SENT.
So1034RBso
not1035RBnot
just1036RBjust
the1037DTthe
hourly1038JJhourly
wage1039NNwage
,1040,,
but1041CCbut
the1042DTthe
sick1043JJsick
time1044NNtime
,1045,,
the1046DTthe
vacation1047NNvacation
time1048NNtime
might1049MDmight
be1050VBbe
included1051VVNinclude
as1052INas
part1053NNpart
of1054INof
the1055DTthe
package1056NNpackage
.1057SENT.
For1058INfor
the1059DTthe
services1060NNSservice
when1061WRBwhen
you1062PPyou
are1063VBPbe
present1064JJpresent
,1065,,
I1066PPI
include1067VVPinclude
that1068DTthat
payment1069NNpayment
.1070SENT.
I1071PPI
think1072VVPthink
of1073INof
a1074DTa
judgment1075NNjudgment
of1076INof
a1077DTa
court1078NNcourt
for1079INfor
negligence1080NNnegligence
get1081VVPget
...1082:...
awarded1083VVDaward
involuntarily1084RBinvoluntarily
against1085INagainst
the1086DTthe
employer1087NNemployer
's1088POS's
consent1089NNconsent
as1090INas
something1091NNsomething
very1092RBvery
different1093JJdifferent
.1094SENT.
What1095WPWhat
's1096VBZbe
wrong1097JJwrong
with1098INwith
that1099DTthat
?1100SENT?
[MS. BLATT]1101LOC[MS. BLATT]
Okay1102NPOkay
.1103SENT.
I1104PPI
do1105VVPdo
n't1106RBn't
want1107VVwant
to1108TOto
call1109VVcall
it1110PPit
simplistic1111JJsimplistic
,1112,,
but1113CCbut
I1114PPI
do1115VVPdo
think1116VVthink
it1117PPit
's1118VBZbe
wrong1119JJwrong
.1120SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1121LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Go1122NPGo
ahead1123RBahead
.1124SENT.
[MS. BLATT]1125LOC[MS. BLATT]
Okay1126NPOkay
.1127SENT.
Here1128RBhere
's1129VBZbe
why1130WRBwhy
.1131SENT.
I1132PPI
mean1133VVPmean
,1134,,
there1135EXthere
's1136VBZbe
absolutely1137RBabsolutely
nothing1138NNnothing
in1139INin
the1140DTthe
statute1141NNstatute
that1142WDTthat
makes1143VVZmake
anything1144NNanything
that1145IN/thatthat
you1146PPyou
said1147VVDsay
relevant1148JJrelevant
.1149SENT.
It1150PPit
just1151RBjust
has1152VHZhave
to1153TOto
be1154VBbe
a1155DTa
payment1156NNpayment
for1157INfor
services1158NNSservice
rendered1159VVNrender
.1160SENT.
And1161CCand
nothing1162NNnothing
in1163INin
the1164DTthe
statute1165NNstatute
distinguishes1166VVZdistinguish
between1167INbetween
a1168DTa
legal1169JJlegal
obligation1170NNobligation
arising1171VVGarise
under1172INunder
your1173PP$your
contract1174NNcontract
...1175:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1176LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well1177UHWell
,1178,,
but1179RBbut
,1180,,
see1181VVsee
,1182,,
that1183WDTthat
's1184VBZbe
not1185RBnot
services1186NNSservice
rendered1187VVDrender
,1188,,
is1189VBZbe
it1190PPit
?1191SENT?
It1192PPit
's1193VBZbe
payment1194NNpayment
for1195INfor
a1196DTa
judgment1197NNjudgment
of1198INof
a1199DTa
court1200NNcourt
.1201SENT.
[MS. BLATT]1202LOC[MS. BLATT]
Right1203RBright
.1204SENT.
And1205CCand
you1206PPyou
can1207MDcan
have1208VHhave
a1209DTa
disability1210NNdisability
payment1211NNpayment
that1212WDTthat
comes1213VVZcome
in1214INin
the1215DTthe
form1216NNform
of1217INof
judgment1218NNjudgment
.1219SENT.
He1220PPhe
concedes1221VVZconcede
that1222IN/thatthat
workers1223NNSworker
'1224POS'
compensation1225NNcompensation
is1226VBZbe
covered1227VVNcover
.1228SENT.
The1229DTthe
judgment1230NNjudgment
or1231CCor
back1232RBback
pay1233VVpay
award1234NNaward
in1235INin
Nierotko1236NPNierotko
was1237VBDbe
a1238DTa
judgment1239NNjudgment
based1240VVNbase
on1241INon
a1242DTa
wrongful1243JJwrongful
discharge1244NNdischarge
by1245INby
violation1246NNviolation
of1247INof
a1248DTa
statute1249NNstatute
.1250SENT.
But1251CCbut
there1252EXthere
's1253VBZbe
just1254RBjust
nothing1255NNnothing
in1256INin
the1257DTthe
...1258:...
in1259INin
the1260DTthe
sense1261NNsense
of1262INof
the1263DTthe
payment1264NNpayment
that1265IN/thatthat
it1266PPit
says1267VVZsay
it1268PPit
has1269VHZhave
to1270TOto
be1271VBbe
either1272RBeither
from1273INfrom
...1274:...
I1275PPI
think1276VVPthink
he1277PPhe
concedes1278VVZconcede
settlements1279NNSsettlement
count1280VVcount
.1281SENT.
So1282RBso
I1283PPI
do1284VVPdo
n't1285RBn't
know1286VVknow
why1287WRBwhy
it1288PPit
's1289VBZbe
different1290JJdifferent
that1291IN/thatthat
a1292DTa
court1293NNcourt
ordered1294VVDorder
the1295DTthe
payment1296NNpayment
.1297SENT.
I1298PPI
mean1299VVPmean
,1300,,
there1301EXthere
's1302VBZbe
...1303:...
there1304EXthere
's1305VBZbe
really1306RBreally
no1307DTno
basis1308NNbasis
for1309INfor
...1310:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1311LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I1312PPI
...1313:...
I1314PPI
get1315VVPget
that1316IN/thatthat
there1317EXthere
's1318VBZbe
a1319DTa
tough1320JJtough
line-drawing1321VVGline-draw
problem1322NNproblem
here1323RBhere
,1324,,
and1325CCand
I1326PPI
have1327VHPhave
some1328DTsome
questions1329NNSquestion
for1330INfor
the1331DTthe
other1332JJother
side1333NNside
on1334INon
that1335DTthat
,1336,,
but1337CCbut
if1338INif
you1339PPyou
just1340RBjust
in1341INin
isolation1342NNisolation
deal1343NNdeal
with1344INwith
the1345DTthe
FELA1346NPFela
judgment1347NNjudgment
compared1348VVNcompare
with1349INwith
,1350,,
say1351VVsay
,1352,,
sick1353JJsick
and1354CCand
vacation1355NNvacation
time1356NNtime
.1357SENT.
[MS. BLATT]1358LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure1359NPSure
.1360SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1361LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
What1362WPWhat
about1363RBabout
...1364:...
[MS. BLATT]1365LOC[MS. BLATT]
I1366PPI
think1367VVPthink
maybe1368RBmaybe
you1369PPyou
're1370VBPbe
going1371VVGgo
to1372TOto
fault1373VVfault
versus1374INversus
a1375DTa
no1376DTno
fault1377NNfault
scheme1378NNscheme
,1379,,
and1380CCand
nothing1381NNnothing
in1382INin
the1383DTthe
statute1384NNstatute
says1385VVZsay
there1386EXthere
has1387VHZhave
to1388TOto
be1389VBbe
fault1390NNfault
or1391CCor
no1392DTno
fault1393NNfault
.1394SENT.
It1395PPit
's1396VBZbe
just1397RBjust
like1398INlike
worker1399NNworker
's1400POS's
compensation1401NNcompensation
is1402VBZbe
...1403:...
he1404PPhe
concedes1405VVZconcede
is1406VBZbe
payment1407NNpayment
for1408INfor
services1409NNSservice
rendered1410VVNrender
.1411SENT.
You1412PPyou
just1413RBjust
do1414VVPdo
n't1415RBn't
have1416VHhave
to1417TOto
prove1418VVprove
negligence1419NNnegligence
.1420SENT.
But1421CCbut
if1422INif
you1423PPyou
...1424:...
suing1425VVGsue
to1426TOto
get1427VVget
maternity1428NNmaternity
leave1429NNleave
,1430,,
you1431PPyou
have1432VHPhave
to1433TOto
prove1434VVprove
you1435PPyou
're1436VBPbe
pregnant1437JJpregnant
.1438SENT.
If1439INif
you1440PPyou
're1441VBPbe
suing1442VVGsue
to1443TOto
get1444VVget
disability1445NNdisability
leave1446NNleave
,1447,,
you1448PPyou
have1449VHPhave
to1450TOto
prove1451VVprove
that1452IN/thatthat
you1453PPyou
're1454VBPbe
disabled1455JJdisabled
.1456SENT.
If1457INif
you1458PPyou
're1459VBPbe
suing1460VVGsue
for1461INfor
workers1462NNSworker
'1463POS'
compensation1464NNcompensation
,1465,,
you1466PPyou
have1467VHPhave
to1468TOto
prove1469VVprove
that1470IN/thatthat
it1471PPit
was1472VBDbe
service-connected1473VVNservice-connect
and1474CCand
that1475DTthat
...1476:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1477LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Can1478MDcan
...1479:...
[MS. BLATT]1480LOC[MS. BLATT]
...1481:...
you1482PPyou
had1483VHDhave
injuries1484NNSinjury
.1485SENT.
I1486PPI
think1487VVPthink
what1488WPwhat
you1489PPyou
're1490VBPbe
saying1491VVGsay
is1492VBZbe
,1493,,
if1494INif
you1495PPyou
have1496VHPhave
to1497TOto
sue1498VVsue
,1499,,
you1500PPyou
can1501MDcan
't1502RB't
be1503VBbe
paid1504VVNpay
for1505INfor
services1506NNSservice
rendered1507VVNrender
,1508,,
but1509CCbut
if1510INif
the1511DTthe
employer1512NNemployer
pays1513VVZpay
it1514PPit
voluntarily1515RBvoluntarily
,1516,,
that1517WDTthat
definitely1518RBdefinitely
is1519VBZbe
atextual1520JJatextual
.1521SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1522LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
As1523INas
a1524DTa
practical1525JJpractical
matter1526NNmatter
,1527,,
going1528VVGgo
back1529RBback
to1530TOto
a1531DTa
part1532NNpart
of1533INof
Justice1534NPJustice
Gorsuch1535NPGorsuch
's1536POS's
question1537NNquestion
,1538,,
in1539INin
most1540JJSmost
state1541NNstate
law1542NNlaw
verdicts1543NNSverdict
,1544,,
there1545EXthere
is1546VBZbe
just1547RBjust
a1548DTa
payment1549NNpayment
.1550SENT.
It1551PPit
's1552VBZbe
a1553DTa
general1554JJgeneral
verdict1555NNverdict
.1556SENT.
How1557WRBHow
are1558VBPbe
you1559PPyou
going1560VVGgo
to1561TOto
figure1562VVfigure
out1563INout
which1564WDTwhich
part1565NNpart
of1566INof
the1567DTthe
award1568NNaward
is1569VBZbe
subject1570JJsubject
to1571TOto
the1572DTthe
deduction1573NNdeduction
?1574SENT?
And1575CCand
...1576:...
and1577CCand
Justice1578NPJustice
Gorsuch1579NPGorsuch
mentioned1580VVDmention
...1581:...
mentioned1582VVNmention
a1583DTa
negligence1584NNnegligence
judgment1585NNjudgment
.1586SENT.
What1587WPWhat
are1588VBPbe
we1589PPwe
going1590VVGgo
to1591TOto
do1592VVdo
with1593INwith
those1594DTthose
?1595SENT?
Here1596RBhere
,1597,,
that1598WDTthat
's1599VBZbe
not1600RBnot
at1601INat
issue1602NNissue
because1603INbecause
there1604EXthere
's1605VHZhave
been1606VBNbe
a1607DTa
concession1608NNconcession
from1609INfrom
the1610DTthe
beginning1611NNbeginning
that1612IN/thatthat
this1613DTthis
award1614NNaward
had1615VHDhave
to1616TOto
do1617VVdo
with1618INwith
past1619JJpast
pay1620NNpay
and1621CCand
medical1622JJmedical
expenses1623NNSexpense
.1624SENT.
So1625RBso
we1626PPwe
know1627VVPknow
the1628DTthe
amounts1629NNSamount
under1630INunder
FELA1631NPFela
,1632,,
but1633CCbut
we1634PPwe
may1635MDmay
not1636RBnot
know1637VVknow
them1638PPthem
in1639INin
a1640DTa
general1641JJgeneral
verdict1642NNverdict
.1643SENT.
So1644RBso
...1645:...
[MS. BLATT]1646LOC[MS. BLATT]
Of1647INof
course1648NNcourse
.1649SENT.
Let1650VVlet
me1651PPme
...1652:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1653LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...1654:...
does1655VVZdo
his1656PP$his
argument1657NNargument
have1658VHPhave
more1659JJRmore
purchase1660NNpurchase
in1661INin
those1662DTthose
situations1663NNSsituation
?1664SENT?
[MS. BLATT]1665LOC[MS. BLATT]
No1666NPNo
,1667,,
because1668RBbecause
,1669,,
under1670INunder
the1671DTthe
Railroad1672NPRailroad
Retirement1673NPRetirement
Act1674NPAct
in1675INin
Section1676NPSection
231h1677NP231h
(1678((
21679CD2
)1680))
...1681:...
this1682DTthis
has1683VHZhave
been1684VBNbe
around1685RBaround
since1686INsince
19461687CD@card@
...1688:...
there1689EXthere
's1690VBZbe
a1691DTa
presumption1692NNpresumption
that1693IN/thatthat
a1694DTa
personal1695JJpersonal
injury1696NNinjury
award1697NNaward
,1698,,
the1699DTthe
entire1700JJentire
amount1701NNamount
,1702,,
is1703VBZbe
treated1704VVNtreat
for1705INfor
lost1706JJlost
time1707NNtime
.1708SENT.
And1709CCand
let1710VVlet
me1711PPme
just1712RBjust
point1713VVPpoint
you1714PPyou
to1715TOto
the1716DTthe
JA1717NPJa
on1718INon
78a1719NP78a
,1720,,
the1721DTthe
Railroad1722NPRailroad
Retirement1723NPRetirement
Board1724NPBoard
gives1725VVZgive
you1726PPyou
sort1727NNsort
of1728INof
the1729DTthe
...1730:...
the1731DTthe
current1732JJcurrent
...1733:...
the1734DTthe
way1735NNway
they1736PPthey
treat1737VVPtreat
this1738DTthis
.1739SENT.
But1740CCbut
let1741VVlet
me1742PPme
go1743VVgo
back1744RBback
to1745TOto
the1746DTthe
statute1747NNstatute
.1748SENT.
The1749DTthe
statute1750NNstatute
says1751VVZsay
all1752DTall
of1753INof
it1754PPit
counts1755VVZcount
for1756INfor
lost1757VVNlose
time1758NNtime
.1759SENT.
However1760RBhowever
,1761,,
the1762DTthe
parties1763NNSparty
can1764MDcan
take1765VVtake
out1766RPout
any1767DTany
amount1768NNamount
that1769IN/thatthat
they1770PPthey
want1771VVPwant
to1772TOto
allocate1773VVallocate
for1774INfor
reasons1775NNSreason
other1776JJother
than1777INthan
lost1778JJlost
time1779NNtime
.1780SENT.
So1781INso
the1782DTthe
parties1783NNSparty
are1784VBPbe
free1785JJfree
to1786TOto
say1787VVsay
whatever1788WDTwhatever
they1789PPthey
want1790VVPwant
.1791SENT.
They1792PPthey
can1793MDcan
say1794VVsay
that1795DTthat
$1796$$
101797CD@card@
was1798VBDbe
lost1799VVNlose
time1800NNtime
.1801SENT.
They1802PPthey
can1803MDcan
say1804VVsay
all1805DTall
of1806INof
it1807PPit
was1808VBDbe
lost1809VVNlose
time1810NNtime
.1811SENT.
So1812RBso
,1813,,
in1814INin
a1815DTa
general1816JJgeneral
verdict1817NNverdict
situation1818NNsituation
,1819,,
you1820PPyou
know1821VVPknow
,1822,,
I1823PPI
think1824VVPthink
what1825WPwhat
the1826DTthe
RRB1827NPRRB
would1828MDwould
say1829VVsay
is1830VBZbe
we1831PPwe
're1832VBPbe
going1833VVGgo
to1834TOto
count1835VVcount
it1836PPit
all1837DTall
as1838RBas
lost1839VVNlose
time1840NNtime
unless1841INunless
there1842EXthere
's1843VBZbe
an1844DTan
allocation1845NNallocation
made1846VVDmake
.1847SENT.
Now1848RBnow
what1849WPwhat
Respondent1850NNrespondent
tries1851VVZtry
to1852TOto
say1853VVsay
is1854VBZbe
,1855,,
well1856RBwell
,1857,,
somehow1858RBsomehow
there1859EXthere
are1860VBPbe
some1861DTsome
shenanigans1862NNSshenanigan
going1863VVGgo
on1864INon
because1865INbecause
,1866,,
you1867PPyou
know1868VVPknow
,1869,,
there1870EXthere
might1871MDmight
be1872VBbe
a1873DTa
reason1874NNreason
to1875TOto
attribute1876VVattribute
it1877PPit
less1878JJRless
to1879TOto
lost1880VVNlose
time1881NNtime
on1882INon
the1883DTthe
taxing1884VVGtax
side1885NNside
,1886,,
but1887CCbut
let1888VVlet
me1889PPme
tell1890VVtell
you1891PPyou
what1892WPwhat
's1893VBZbe
going1894VVGgo
to1895TOto
happen1896VVhappen
if1897INif
we1898PPwe
lose1899VVPlose
because1900INbecause
of1901INof
h1902NNh
(1903((
21904CD2
)1905))
.1906SENT.
If1907INif
we1908PPwe
lose1909VVPlose
,1910,,
a1911DTa
employee1912NNemployee
can1913MDcan
take1914VVtake
an1915DTan
entire1916JJentire
judgment1917NNjudgment
,1918,,
no1919DTno
matter1920NNmatter
what1921WPwhat
was1922VBDbe
devoted1923VVNdevote
to1924TOto
lost1925VVNlose
time1926NNtime
,1927,,
and1928CCand
get1929VVget
full1930JJfull
credit1931NNcredit
and1932CCand
pay1933VVpay
zero1934CDzero
tax1935NNtax
.1936SENT.
And1937CCand
the1938DTthe
incentive1939NNincentive
will1940MDwill
be1941VBbe
...1942:...
there1943EXthere
's1944VBZbe
just1945RBjust
no1946DTno
downside1947NNdownside
to1948TOto
doing1949VVGdo
that1950DTthat
.1951SENT.
So1952RBso
you1953PPyou
would1954MDwould
take1955VVtake
all1956DTall
of1957INof
it1958PPit
and1959CCand
get1960VVget
your1961PP$your
credit1962NNcredit
,1963,,
and1964CCand
pay1965VVpay
absolutely1966RBabsolutely
no1967DTno
taxes1968NNStaxis
.1969SENT.
And1970CCand
that1971DTthat
's1972VBZbe
just1973RBjust
h1974NNh
(1975((
21976CD2
)1977))
.1978SENT.
In1979INin
the1980DTthe
statute1981NNstatute
,1982,,
there1983EXthere
's1984VBZbe
the1985DTthe
RRB1986NPRRB
guidance1987NNguidance
on1988INon
it1989PPit
.1990SENT.
The1991DTthe
SG1992NPSG
's1993POS's
office1994NNoffice
can1995MDcan
...1996:...
can1997MDcan
vouch1998VVvouch
,1999,,
you2000PPyou
know2001VVPknow
,2002,,
confirm2003VVPconfirm
all2004DTall
this2005NNthis
,2006,,
but2007CCbut
that2008DTthat
's2009VBZbe
just2010RBjust
the2011DTthe
way2012NNway
this2013DTthis
has2014VHZhave
been2015VBNbe
treated2016VVNtreat
.2017SENT.
Now2018RBnow
,2019,,
in2020RBin
...2021:...
the2022DTthe
state2023NNstate
cases2024NNScase
that2025WDTthat
have2026VHPhave
addressed2027VVNaddress
the2028DTthe
issue2029NNissue
have2030VHPhave
said2031VVNsay
that2032IN/thatthat
we2033PPwe
'll2034MDwill
use2035VVuse
the2036DTthe
same2037JJsame
allocation2038NNallocation
scheme2039NNscheme
on2040INon
the2041DTthe
taxing2042VVGtax
side2043NNside
.2044SENT.
So2045INso
all2046DTall
three2047CDthree
at2048INat
least2049JJSleast
state2050NNstate
supreme2051NNsupreme
courts2052NNScourt
who2053WPwho
addressed2054VVDaddress
it2055PPit
have2056VHPhave
decided2057VVNdecide
that2058DTthat
issue2059NNissue
.2060SENT.
And2061CCand
,2062,,
Justice2063NPJustice
Gorsuch2064NPGorsuch
,2065,,
I2066PPI
do2067VVPdo
want2068VVwant
to2069TOto
say2070VVsay
Nierotko2071NPNierotko
involved2072VVDinvolve
a2073DTa
judgment2074NNjudgment
,2075,,
although2076INalthough
it2077PPit
was2078VBDbe
by2079INby
the2080DTthe
NLRB2081NPNLRB
,2082,,
so2083RBso
an2084DTan
agency2085NNagency
judgment2086NNjudgment
.2087SENT.
And2088CCand
,2089,,
Justice2090NPJustice
Kavanaugh2091NPKavanaugh
,2092,,
let2093VVDlet
me2094PPme
just2095RBjust
say2096VVPsay
,2097,,
although2098INalthough
I2099PPI
think2100VVPthink
there2101EXthere
's2102VBZbe
these2103DTthese
textual2104JJtextual
and2105CCand
the2106DTthe
pragmatic2107JJpragmatic
definition2108NNdefinition
the2109DTthe
Court2110NPCourt
gave2111VVDgive
,2112,,
I2113PPI
do2114VVPdo
think2115VVthink
it2116PPit
's2117VBZbe
worth2118JJworth
just2119RBjust
noting2120VVGnote
the2121DTthe
concurrence2122NNconcurrence
of2123INof
Justice2124NPJustice
Frankfurter2125NNfrankfurter
,2126,,
who2127WPwho
said2128VVDsay
sort2129NNsort
of2130INof
that2131DTthat
,2132,,
you2133PPyou
know2134VVPknow
,2135,,
we2136PPwe
're2137VBPbe
going2138VVGgo
to2139TOto
deem2140VVdeem
employees2141NNSemployee
to2142TOto
be2143VBbe
in2144INin
the2145DTthe
service2146NNservice
of2147INof
the2148DTthe
employer2149NNemployer
if2150INif
they2151PPthey
were2152VBDbe
forced2153VVNforce
into2154INinto
idleness2155NNidleness
because2156INbecause
of2157INof
the2158DTthe
employer2159NNemployer
's2160POS's
wrongdoing2161NNwrongdoing
.2162SENT.
I2163PPI
mean2164VVPmean
,2165,,
that2166WDTthat
's2167VBZbe
just2168RBjust
an2169DTan
alternative2170JJalternative
way2171NNway
of2172INof
looking2173VVGlook
at2174INat
it2175PPit
.2176SENT.
You2177PPyou
do2178VVPdo
n't2179RBn't
have2180VHhave
to2181TOto
look2182VVlook
at2183INat
it2184PPit
that2185WDTthat
way2186NNway
,2187,,
but2188CCbut
...2189:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]2190LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
If2191INif
...2192:...
if2193INif
you2194PPyou
're2195VBPbe
right2196RBright
about2197RBabout
that2198DTthat
theory2199NNtheory
,2200,,
why2201WRBwhy
would2202MDwould
n't2203RBn't
the2204DTthe
pain2205NNpain
and2206CCand
suffering2207VVGsuffer
component2208NNcomponent
also2209RBalso
count2210VVcount
?2211SENT?
[MS. BLATT]2212LOC[MS. BLATT]
Well2213UHWell
,2214,,
because2215INbecause
the2216DTthe
pain2217NNpain
and2218CCand
suffering2219NNsuffering
is2220VBZbe
not2221RBnot
payment2222NNpayment
for2223INfor
services2224NNSservice
rendered2225VVNrender
in2226INin
the2227DTthe
same2228JJsame
way2229NNway
a2230DTa
lost2231VVNlose
wage2232NNwage
award2233NNaward
is2234VBZbe
.2235SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]2236LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well2237UHWell
,2238,,
if2239INif
I2240PPI
understood2241VVDunderstand
your2242PP$your
theory2243NNtheory
,2244,,
it2245PPit
was2246VBDbe
something2247NNsomething
like2248INlike
it2249PPit
happened2250VVDhappen
while2251INwhile
he2252PPhe
was2253VBDbe
on2254INon
the2255DTthe
job2256NNjob
,2257,,
and2258CCand
,2259,,
therefore2260RBtherefore
,2261,,
what2262WPwhat
follows2263VVZfollow
is2264VBZbe
...2265:...
is2266VBZbe
...2267:...
is2268VBZbe
...2269:...
can2270MDcan
be2271VBbe
understood2272VVNunderstand
as2273INas
services2274NNSservice
rendered2275VVNrender
.2276SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2277LOC[MS. BLATT]
No2278NPNo
.2279SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]2280LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
And2281CCand
the2282DTthe
pain2283NNpain
and2284CCand
suffering2285VVGsuffer
as2286RBas
well2287RBwell
.2288SENT.
It2289PPit
's2290VBZbe
like2291JJlike
,2292,,
well2293RBwell
,2294,,
you2295PPyou
were2296VBDbe
injured2297VVNinjure
on2298INon
the2299DTthe
job2300NNjob
and2301CCand
that2302DTthat
's2303VBZbe
why2304WRBwhy
you2305PPyou
had2306VHDhave
this2307DTthis
pain2308NNpain
and2309CCand
suffering2310NNsuffering
.2311SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2312LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure2313NPSure
.2314SENT.
It2315PPit
's2316VBZbe
not2317RBnot
payment2318NNpayment
for2319INfor
services2320NNSservice
rendered2321VVNrender
in2322INin
the2323DTthe
same2324JJsame
way2325NNway
because2326INbecause
the2327DTthe
amount2328NNamount
of2329INof
lost2330VVNlose
wages2331NNSwage
is2332VBZbe
directly2333RBdirectly
tied2334VVNtie
to2335TOto
the2336DTthe
salary2337NNsalary
for2338INfor
services2339NNSservice
rendered2340VVNrender
.2341SENT.
And2342CCand
the2343DTthe
pain2344NNpain
and2345CCand
suffering2346NNsuffering
amount2347NNamount
has2348VHZhave
nothing2349NNnothing
to2350TOto
do2351VVdo
with2352INwith
your2353PP$your
salary2354NNsalary
,2355,,
your2356PP$your
employment2357NNemployment
,2358,,
or2359CCor
anything2360NNanything
else2361RBelse
about2362INabout
the2363DTthe
employment2364NNemployment
relationship2365NNrelationship
.2366SENT.
Plus2367RBplus
,2368,,
there2369EXthere
's2370VBZbe
a2371DTa
strong2372JJstrong
textual2373JJtextual
argument2374NNargument
.2375SENT.
You2376PPyou
do2377VVPdo
n't2378RBn't
have2379VHhave
to2380TOto
take2381VVtake
my2382PP$my
analysis2383NNanalysis
.2384SENT.
Congress2385NPCongress
has2386VHZhave
already2387RBalready
distinguished2388VVNdistinguish
between2389INbetween
lost2390JJlost
time2391NNtime
pay2392NNpay
and2393CCand
other2394JJother
factors2395NNSfactor
associated2396VVNassociate
with2397INwith
a2398DTa
personal2399JJpersonal
injury2400NNinjury
award2401NNaward
.2402SENT.
So2403RBso
Congress2404NPCongress
has2405VHZhave
said2406VVNsay
the2407DTthe
parties2408NNSparty
are2409VBPbe
free2410JJfree
to2411TOto
only2412RBonly
count2413VVcount
as2414INas
a2415DTa
personal2416JJpersonal
injury2417NNinjury
award2418NNaward
just2419RBjust
the2420DTthe
lost2421VVNlose
wages2422NNSwage
.2423SENT.
So2424INso
Congress2425NPCongress
was2426VBDbe
debating2427VVGdebate
this2428DTthis
back2429NNback
in2430INin
19462431CD@card@
,2432,,
all2433PDTall
these2434DTthese
issues2435NNSissue
about2436INabout
what2437WPwhat
to2438TOto
do2439VVdo
with2440INwith
things2441NNSthing
that2442WDTthat
were2443VBDbe
associated2444VVNassociate
with2445INwith
other2446JJother
lost2447JJlost
time2448NNtime
,2449,,
and2450CCand
they2451PPthey
settled2452VVDsettle
on2453INon
this2454DTthis
we2455PPwe
're2456VBPbe
going2457VVGgo
to2458TOto
presume2459VVpresume
it2460PPit
's2461VBZbe
all2462RBall
counted2463VVNcount
,2464,,
but2465CCbut
we2466PPwe
'll2467MDwill
let2468VVlet
you2469PPyou
take2470VVtake
out2471RPout
anything2472NNanything
that2473WDTthat
's2474VBZbe
not2475RBnot
related2476VVNrelate
to2477TOto
lost2478VVNlose
wages2479NNSwage
.2480SENT.
So2481RBso
...2482:...
a2483DTa
question2484NNquestion
?2485SENT?
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2486LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
The2487DTthe
court2488NNcourt
...2489:...
court2490NNcourt
of2491INof
appeals2492NNSappeal
relied2493VVNrely
heavily2494RBheavily
on2495INon
the2496DTthe
fact2497NNfact
that2498IN/thatthat
Congress2499NPCongress
in2500RBin
'2501POS'
752502CD@card@
and2503NPand
'2504POS'
832505CD@card@
took2506VVDtake
out2507RPout
the2508DTthe
reference2509NNreference
to2510TOto
payment2511NNpayment
for2512INfor
time2513NNtime
lost2514VVDlose
.2515SENT.
[MS. BLATT]2516LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure2517NPSure
.2518SENT.
So2519RBso
,2520,,
I2521PPI
mean2522VVPmean
,2523,,
let2524VVPlet
's2525POS's
start2526NNstart
again2527RBagain
with2528INwith
...2529:...
with2530INwith
first2531JJfirst
principles2532NNSprinciple
.2533SENT.
Under2534INunder
that2535DTthat
view2536NNview
,2537,,
that2538WDTthat
takes2539VVZtake
out2540RPout
,2541,,
I2542PPI
mean2543VVPmean
,2544,,
everything2545NNeverything
,2546,,
the2547DTthe
vacation2548NNvacation
,2549,,
the2550DTthe
holiday2551NNholiday
,2552,,
everything2553NNeverything
.2554SENT.
So2555RBso
that2556DTthat
's2557VBZbe
fine2558JJfine
.2559SENT.
And2560CCand
I2561PPI
think2562VVPthink
that2563IN/thatthat
Respondent2564NNrespondent
does2565VVZdo
n't2566RBn't
...2567:...
concedes2568VVZconcede
that2569IN/thatthat
away2570RBaway
and2571CCand
does2572VVZdo
n't2573RBn't
defend2574VVdefend
it2575PPit
for2576INfor
good2577JJgood
reason2578NNreason
.2579SENT.
And2580CCand
that2581DTthat
's2582VBZbe
because2583INbecause
the2584DTthe
...2585:...
the2586DTthe
rule2587NNrule
against2588INagainst
superfluity2589NNsuperfluity
has2590VHZhave
the2591DTthe
provisions2592NNSprovision
in2593INin
(2594((
e2595LSe
)2596))
(2597((
12598LS1
)2599))
and2600CCand
(2601((
e2602LSe
)2603))
(2604((
42605LS4
)2606))
that2607WDTthat
are2608VBPbe
time2609NNtime
lost2610VVDlose
payments2611NNSpayment
for2612INfor
worker2613NNworker
's2614POS's
compensation2615NNcompensation
,2616,,
sickness2617NNsickness
,2618,,
and2619CCand
disability2620NNdisability
.2621SENT.
And2622CCand
those2623DTthose
exceptions2624NNSexception
would2625MDwould
n't2626RBn't
be2627VBbe
in2628INin
there2629RBthere
unless2630INunless
they2631PPthey
were2632VBDbe
otherwise2633RBotherwise
included2634VVNinclude
within2635INwithin
the2636DTthe
operative2637JJoperative
definition2638NNdefinition
.2639SENT.
But2640CCbut
,2641,,
Justice2642NPJustice
Kavanaugh2643NPKavanaugh
,2644,,
let2645VVNlet
's2646POS's
look2647NNlook
at2648INat
the2649DTthe
timing2650NNtiming
,2651,,
and2652CCand
I2653PPI
think2654VVPthink
that2655IN/thatthat
this2656DTthis
is2657VBZbe
pretty2658RBpretty
dispositive2659JJdispositive
as2660INas
well2661RBwell
.2662SENT.
Congress2663NPCongress
added2664VVDadd
the2665DTthe
sickness2666NNsickness
,2667,,
worker2668NNworker
's2669POS's
compensation2670NNcompensation
,2671,,
and2672CCand
disability2673NNdisability
payments2674NNSpayment
in2675INin
19772676CD@card@
and2677CCand
then2678RBthen
amended2679VVDamend
them2680PPthem
in2681INin
19812682CD@card@
.2683SENT.
So2684RBso
that2685DTthat
was2686VBDbe
after2687INafter
Congress2688NPCongress
took2689VVDtake
out2690RPout
the2691DTthe
including2692VVGinclude
remuneration2693NNremuneration
paid2694VVNpay
for2695INfor
services2696NNSservice
rendered2697VVNrender
in2698INin
'2699'''
752700CD@card@
.2701SENT.
And2702CCand
then2703RBthen
when2704WRBwhen
Congress2705NPCongress
took2706VVDtake
out2707RPout
in2708INin
...2709:...
I2710PPI
'm2711VBPbe
sorry2712JJsorry
,2713,,
in2714INin
'2715POS'
752716CD@card@
,2717,,
when2718WRBwhen
Congress2719NPCongress
took2720VVDtake
out2721RPout
the2722DTthe
phrase2723NNphrase
,2724,,
then2725RBthen
they2726PPthey
added2727VVDadd
the2728DTthe
exceptions2729NNSexception
later2730RBRlater
,2731,,
they2732PPthey
also2733RBalso
left2734VVDleave
in2735INin
seven2736CDseven
references2737NNSreference
to2738TOto
time2739VVtime
lost2740JJlost
and2741CCand
personal2742JJpersonal
injury2743NNinjury
in2744INin
(2745((
e2746LSe
)2747))
(2748((
22749LS2
)2750))
.2751SENT.
So2752RBso
we2753PPwe
know2754VVPknow
that2755IN/thatthat
Congress2756NPCongress
continued2757VVDcontinue
to2758TOto
think2759VVthink
that2760DTthat
time2761NNtime
lost2762VVDlose
payments2763NNSpayment
were2764VBDbe
covered2765VVNcover
.2766SENT.
Now2767RBnow
comes2768VVZcome
19832769CD@card@
and2770CCand
Congress2771NPCongress
takes2772VVZtake
out2773INout
(2774((
e2775LSe
)2776))
(2777((
22778LS2
)2779))
,2780,,
but2781CCbut
it2782PPit
did2783VVDdo
n't2784RBn't
change2785VVchange
the2786DTthe
operative2787JJoperative
definition2788NNdefinition
in2789INin
(2790((
e2791LSe
)2792))
(2793((
12794LS1
)2795))
,2796,,
and2797CCand
it2798PPit
left2799VVDleave
in2800INin
all2801PDTall
the2802DTthe
exceptions2803NNSexception
for2804INfor
worker2805NNworker
's2806POS's
compensation2807NNcompensation
,2808,,
sickness2809NNsickness
and2810CCand
disability2811NNdisability
,2812,,
that2813WDTthat
presupposed2814VVDpresuppose
time2815NNtime
lost2816VVNlose
is2817VBZbe
covered2818VVNcover
.2819SENT.
So2820RBso
I2821PPI
do2822VVPdo
think2823VVthink
that2824WDTthat
,2825,,
you2826PPyou
know2827VVPknow
,2828,,
the2829DTthe
including2830VVGinclude
remuneration2831NNremuneration
paid2832VVNpay
for2833INfor
time2834NNtime
...2835:...
time2836NNtime
lost2837VVDlose
,2838,,
you2839PPyou
know2840VVPknow
,2841,,
is2842VBZbe
fairly2843RBfairly
read2844VVNread
as2845INas
an2846DTan
illustrative2847JJillustrative
example2848NNexample
of2849INof
the2850DTthe
broader2851JJRbroad
definition2852NNdefinition
.2853SENT.
I2854PPI
'm2855VBPbe
going2856VVGgo
to2857TOto
briefly2858RBbriefly
go2859VVgo
over2860INover
the2861DTthe
1042862CD@card@
argument2863NNargument
if2864INif
I2865PPI
could2866MDcould
.2867SENT.
Just2868RBjust
putting2869VVGput
...2870:...
this2871DTthis
is2872VBZbe
the2873DTthe
argument2874NNargument
that2875IN/thatthat
Respondent2876NNrespondent
makes2877VVZmake
as2878INas
a2879DTa
backup2880NNbackup
that2881IN/thatthat
,2882,,
because2883INbecause
personal2884JJpersonal
injury2885NNinjury
awards2886NNSaward
are2887VBPbe
excluded2888VVNexclude
from2889INfrom
gross2890JJgross
income2891NNincome
under2892INunder
1042893CD@card@
,2894,,
and2895CCand
an2896DTan
employee2897NNemployee
is2898VBZbe
taxed2899VVNtax
on2900INon
his2901PP$his
or2902CCor
her2903PP$her
income2904NNincome
,2905,,
you2906PPyou
should2907MDshould
take2908VVtake
out2909RPout
gross2910JJgross
income2911NNincome
.2912SENT.
And2913CCand
I2914PPI
'm2915VBPbe
not2916RBnot
going2917VVGgo
to2918TOto
be2919VBbe
able2920JJable
to2921TOto
explain2922VVexplain
it2923PPit
past2924JJpast
that2925IN/thatthat
point2926NNpoint
,2927,,
but2928CCbut
that2929DTthat
's2930VBZbe
the2931DTthe
beginning2932NNbeginning
of2933INof
his2934PP$his
argument2935NNargument
.2936SENT.
The2937DTthe
problem2938NNproblem
with2939INwith
it2940PPit
is2941VBZbe
,2942,,
first2943JJfirst
of2944INof
all2945DTall
,2946,,
32012947CD@card@
,2948,,
the2949DTthe
tax2950NNtax
...2951:...
the2952DTthe
statute2953NNstatute
that2954IN/thatthat
taxes2955NNStaxis
on2956INon
income2957NNincome
does2958VVZdo
not2959RBnot
use2960VVuse
the2961DTthe
word2962NNword
gross2963JJgross
income2964NNincome
.2965SENT.
It2966PPit
just2967RBjust
says2968VVZsay
income2969NNincome
.2970SENT.
And2971CCand
no2972DTno
matter2973NNmatter
what2974WPwhat
word2975VVPword
it2976PPit
used2977VVDuse
,2978,,
we2979PPwe
think2980VVPthink
it2981PPit
just2982RBjust
describes2983VVZdescribe
the2984DTthe
source2985NNsource
of2986INof
the2987DTthe
tax2988NNtax
.2989SENT.
And2990CCand
if2991INif
you2992PPyou
just2993RBjust
look2994VVPlook
at2995INat
the2996DTthe
language2997NNlanguage
,2998,,
the2999DTthe
employee3000NNemployee
's3001POS's
income3002NNincome
has3003VHZhave
no3004DTno
bearing3005NNbearing
on3006INon
either3007CCeither
the3008DTthe
tax3009NNtax
base3010NNbase
or3011CCor
the3012DTthe
amount3013NNamount
of3014INof
tax3015NNtax
owed3016VVNowe
.3017SENT.
It3018PPit
's3019VBZbe
just3020RBjust
describing3021VVGdescribe
the3022DTthe
source3023NNsource
.3024SENT.
And3025CCand
that3026DTthat
tax3027NNtax
base3028NNbase
is3029VBZbe
identically3030RBidentically
defined3031VVNdefine
for3032INfor
the3033DTthe
employer3034NNemployer
in3035INin
Section3036NPSection
32213037CD@card@
,3038,,
so3039RBso
as3040INas
a3041DTa
textual3042JJtextual
matter3043NNmatter
,3044,,
it3045PPit
can3046MDcan
't3047RB't
be3048VBbe
different3049JJdifferent
.3050SENT.
And3051CCand
,3052,,
finally3053RBfinally
,3054,,
Congress3055NPCongress
incorporated3056VVDincorporate
nine3057CDnine
express3058JJexpress
exclusions3059NNSexclusion
from3060INfrom
gross3061JJgross
income3062NNincome
into3063INinto
the3064DTthe
definition3065NNdefinition
of3066INof
compensation3067NNcompensation
,3068,,
showing3069VVGshow
Congress3070NPCongress
knew3071VVDknow
how3072WRBhow
to3073TOto
incorporate3074VVincorporate
gross3075JJgross
exclusions3076NNSexclusion
when3077WRBwhen
they3078PPthey
wanted3079VVDwant
to3080TOto
,3081,,
and3082CCand
Section3083NPSection
1043084CD@card@
is3085VBZbe
not3086RBnot
one3087CDone
of3088INof
them3089PPthem
.3090SENT.
And3091CCand
if3092INif
I3093PPI
could3094MDcould
reserve3095VVreserve
the3096DTthe
remainder3097NNremainder
of3098INof
my3099PP$my
time3100NNtime
.3101SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3102LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank3103VVthank
you3104PPyou
,3105,,
counsel3106NNcounsel
.3107SENT.
Ms3108NNMs
.3109SENT.
Kovner3110NPKovner
.3111SENT.
[MS. KOVNER]3112LOC[MS. KOVNER]
Mr3113NPMr
.3114SENT.
Chief3115NPChief
Justice3116NPJustice
,3117,,
and3118CCand
may3119MDmay
it3120PPit
please3121VVplease
the3122DTthe
Court3123NPCourt
:3124::
As3125INas
Respondent3126NNrespondent
now3127RBnow
concedes3128VVZconcede
,3129,,
the3130DTthe
Eighth3131JJeighth
Circuit3132NNcircuit
misconstrued3133VVDmisconstrue
the3134DTthe
RRTA3135NPRRTA
when3136WRBwhen
it3137PPit
held3138VVDhold
that3139IN/thatthat
compensation3140NNcompensation
includes3141VVZinclude
only3142JJonly
payments3143NNSpayment
for3144INfor
hours3145NNShour
when3146WRBwhen
the3147DTthe
employee3148NNemployee
is3149VBZbe
an3150DTan
active3151JJactive
server3152NNserver
to3153TOto
the3154DTthe
employer3155NNemployer
,3156,,
a3157DTa
holding3158NNholding
that3159WDTthat
would3160MDwould
exclude3161VVexclude
sick3162JJsick
leave3163NNleave
,3164,,
vacation3165NNvacation
pay3166NNpay
,3167,,
and3168CCand
severance3169NNseverance
.3170SENT.
There3171EXthere
are3172VBPbe
three3173CDthree
main3174JJmain
sources3175NNSsource
that3176IN/thatthat
each3177DTeach
establish3178VVestablish
that3179IN/thatthat
,3180,,
instead3181RBinstead
,3182,,
compensation3183NNcompensation
includes3184VVZinclude
employer3185NNemployer
payments3186NNSpayment
for3187INfor
hours3188NNShour
when3189WRBwhen
an3190DTan
employee3191NNemployee
is3192VBZbe
absent3193JJabsent
from3194INfrom
active3195JJactive
service3196NNservice
,3197,,
including3198VVGinclude
time3199NNtime
lost3200VVDlose
.3201SENT.
Starting3202VVGstart
with3203INwith
text3204NNtext
,3205,,
the3206DTthe
RRTA3207NPRRTA
contains3208VVZcontain
limited3209JJlimited
exclusions3210NNSexclusion
for3211INfor
worker3212NNworker
's3213POS's
compensation3214NNcompensation
benefits3215NNSbenefit
and3216CCand
for3217INfor
certain3218JJcertain
types3219NNStype
of3220INof
sickness3221NNsickness
and3222CCand
disability3223NNdisability
benefits3224NNSbenefit
.3225SENT.
Those3226DTthose
exclusions3227NNSexclusion
would3228MDwould
be3229VBbe
superfluous3230JJsuperfluous
if3231INif
the3232DTthe
term3233NNterm
"3234``"
compensation3235NNcompensation
"3236''"
only3237RBonly
reached3238VVNreach
payments3239NNSpayment
for3240INfor
periods3241NNSperiod
of3242INof
active3243JJactive
service3244NNservice
.3245SENT.
As3246RBas
to3247TOto
precedent3248NNprecedent
,3249,,
since3250INsince
19463251CD@card@
,3252,,
this3253DTthis
Court3254NPCourt
has3255VHZhave
construed3256VVNconstrue
parallel3257JJparallel
language3258NNlanguage
in3259INin
the3260DTthe
Social3261NPSocial
Security3262NPSecurity
Act3263NPAct
to3264TOto
reach3265VVreach
all3266DTall
payments3267NNSpayment
arising3268VVGarise
out3269RPout
of3270INof
the3271DTthe
employer3272NNemployer
/3273SYM/
employee3274NNemployee
relationship3275NNrelationship
,3276,,
including3277VVGinclude
time3278NNtime
lost3279VVDlose
.3280SENT.
And3281CCand
,3282,,
Justice3283NPJustice
Kavanaugh3284NPKavanaugh
,3285,,
to3286TOto
your3287PP$your
question3288NNquestion
about3289RBabout
whether3290INwhether
that3291DTthat
continues3292VVZcontinue
to3293TOto
be3294VBbe
good3295JJgood
law3296NNlaw
,3297,,
this3298DTthis
Court3299NPCourt
reaffirmed3300VVDreaffirm
that3301DTthat
precedent3302NNprecedent
.3303SENT.
It3304PPit
applied3305VVDapply
it3306PPit
in3307INin
Quality3308NPQuality
Stores3309NPSStores
just3310RBjust
in3311INin
20143312CD@card@
.3313SENT.
And3314CCand
those3315DTthose
decisions3316NNSdecision
support3317VVPsupport
also3318RBalso
construing3319VVGconstrue
the3320DTthe
RRTA3321NPRRTA
to3322TOto
reach3323VVreach
time3324NNtime
lost3325VVNlose
.3326SENT.
And3327CCand
,3328,,
third3329JJthird
,3330,,
this3331DTthis
interpretation3332NNinterpretation
appropriately3333RBappropriately
reflects3334VVZreflect
the3335DTthe
interlocking3336VVGinterlock
structure3337NNstructure
of3338INof
the3339DTthe
RRTA3340NPRRTA
and3341CCand
the3342DTthe
parallel3343JJparallel
benefits3344NNSbenefit
statute3345NNstatute
known3346VVNknow
as3347INas
the3348DTthe
RRA3349NPRRA
.3350SENT.
Time3351NNtime
lost3352VVDlose
payments3353NNSpayment
count3354VVcount
as3355INas
compensation3356NNcompensation
under3357INunder
the3358DTthe
RRA3359NPRRA
,3360,,
and3361CCand
are3362VBPbe
credited3363VVNcredit
towards3364INtowards
an3365DTan
employee3366NNemployee
's3367POS's
retirement3368NNretirement
benefits3369NNSbenefit
.3370SENT.
Interpreting3371VVGinterpret
the3372DTthe
RRTA3373NPRRTA
's3374POS's
definition3375NNdefinition
to3376TOto
cover3377VVcover
those3378DTthose
payments3379NNSpayment
creates3380VVZcreate
symmetry3381NNsymmetry
between3382INbetween
interrelated3383VVNinterrelate
tax3384NNtax
and3385CCand
benefit3386NNbenefit
provisions3387NNSprovision
.3388SENT.
And3389CCand
if3390INif
I3391PPI
could3392MDcould
start3393VVstart
by3394INby
just3395RBjust
turning3396VVGturn
to3397TOto
Justice3398NPJustice
Gorsuch3399NPGorsuch
's3400POS's
question3401NNquestion
about3402INabout
why3403WRBwhy
it3404PPit
's3405VBZbe
not3406RBnot
different3407JJdifferent
,3408,,
that3409IN/thatthat
this3410DTthis
payment3411NNpayment
is3412VBZbe
essentially3413RBessentially
a3414DTa
statutorily-mandated3415JJstatutorily-mandated
payment3416NNpayment
that3417IN/thatthat
results3418NNSresult
from3419INfrom
a3420DTa
judgment3421NNjudgment
at3422INat
the3423DTthe
end3424NNend
of3425INof
the3426DTthe
day3427NNday
.3428SENT.
We3429PPwe
think3430VVPthink
there3431EXthere
are3432VBPbe
two3433CDtwo
main3434JJmain
sources3435NNSsource
that3436WDTthat
show3437VVPshow
that3438IN/thatthat
the3439DTthe
fact3440NNfact
that3441IN/thatthat
it3442PPit
's3443VBZbe
a3444DTa
legal3445JJlegal
obligation3446NNobligation
does3447VVZdo
n't3448RBn't
make3449VVmake
a3450DTa
difference3451NNdifference
.3452SENT.
The3453DTthe
first3454JJfirst
is3455VBZbe
in3456INin
the3457DTthe
statutory3458JJstatutory
text3459NNtext
,3460,,
the3461DTthe
worker3462NNworker
's3463POS's
compensation3464NNcompensation
carveout3465NNcarveout
is3466VBZbe
really3467RBreally
appropriate3468JJappropriate
...3469:...
is3470VBZbe
really3471RBreally
important3472JJimportant
,3473,,
because3474INbecause
it3475PPit
shows3476VVZshow
that3477IN/thatthat
it3478PPit
can3479MDcan
be3480VBbe
...3481:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]3482LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
That3483DTthat
's3484VBZbe
where3485WRBwhere
I3486PPI
get3487VVPget
stuck3488VVNstick
too3489RBtoo
.3490SENT.
I3491PPI
've3492VHPhave
got3493VVNget
some3494DTsome
questions3495NNSquestion
about3496INabout
that3497DTthat
for3498INfor
your3499PP$your
friend3500NNfriend
on3501INon
the3502DTthe
other3503JJother
side3504NNside
.3505SENT.
What3506WPWhat
's3507VBZbe
your3508PP$your
other3509JJother
one3510CDone
?3511SENT?
[MS. KOVNER]3512LOC[MS. KOVNER]
The3513DTthe
other3514JJother
one3515CDone
is3516VBZbe
Nierotko3517NPNierotko
,3518,,
which3519WDTwhich
also3520RBalso
involves3521VVZinvolve
essentially3522RBessentially
a3523DTa
judgment3524NNjudgment
.3525SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3526LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Could3527MDcould
you3528PPyou
tell3529VVtell
me3530PPme
what3531WPwhat
...3532:...
what3533WPwhat
we3534PPwe
should3535MDshould
make3536VVmake
of3537INof
the3538DTthe
fact3539NNfact
that3540IN/thatthat
the3541DTthe
IRS3542NPIRS
does3543VVZdo
n't3544RBn't
appear3545VVappear
...3546:...
you3547PPyou
might3548MDmight
correct3549VVcorrect
me3550PPme
...3551:...
since3552INsince
19803553CD@card@
at3554INat
least3555JJSleast
,3556,,
to3557TOto
bring3558VVbring
enforcement3559NNenforcement
actions3560NNSaction
to3561TOto
assess3562VVassess
penalties3563NNSpenalty
or3564CCor
back-taxes3565NNSback-taxes
to3566TOto
a3567DTa
railroad3568NNrailroad
employee3569NNemployee
who3570WPwho
has3571VHZhave
...3572:...
who3573WPwho
did3574VVDdo
not3575RBnot
withhold3576VVwithhold
a3577DTa
portion3578NNportion
of3579INof
the3580DTthe
FELA3581NPFela
judgment3582NNjudgment
?3583SENT?
[MS. KOVNER]3584LOC[MS. KOVNER]
So3585INso
we3586PPwe
do3587VVPdo
n't3588RBn't
think3589VVthink
that3590WDTthat
's3591VBZbe
exactly3592RBexactly
correct3593JJcorrect
,3594,,
Justice3595NPJustice
Sotomayor3596NPSotomayor
.3597SENT.
So3598RBso
I3599PPI
think3600VVPthink
,3601,,
to3602TOto
understand3603VVunderstand
the3604DTthe
IRS3605NPIRS
's3606POS's
position3607NNposition
,3608,,
the3609DTthe
most3610RBSmost
relevant3611JJrelevant
indicators3612NNSindicator
are3613VBPbe
,3614,,
first3615RBfirst
,3616,,
the3617DTthe
regulations3618NNSregulation
,3619,,
which3620WDTwhich
have3621VHPhave
continuously3622RBcontinuously
said3623VVNsay
,3624,,
you3625PPyou
know3626VVPknow
,3627,,
time3628NNtime
lost3629VVDlose
payments3630NNSpayment
are3631VBPbe
covered3632VVNcover
,3633,,
since3634INsince
19373635CD@card@
,3636,,
and3637CCand
continues3638VVZcontinue
to3639TOto
the3640DTthe
present3641NNpresent
.3642SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3643LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
You3644PPyou
said3645VVDsay
it3646PPit
,3647,,
but3648CCbut
you3649PPyou
have3650VHPhave
n't3651RBn't
appeared3652VVNappear
to3653TOto
do3654VVdo
much3655RBmuch
about3656INabout
it3657PPit
.3658SENT.
[MS. KOVNER]3659LOC[MS. KOVNER]
So3660INso
I3661PPI
do3662VVPdo
n't3663RBn't
think3664VVthink
that3665WDTthat
's3666VBZbe
the3667DTthe
case3668NNcase
.3669SENT.
I3670PPI
mean3671VVPmean
,3672,,
whenever3673WRBwhenever
we3674PPwe
've3675VHPhave
been3676VBNbe
asked3677VVNask
,3678,,
there3679EXthere
's3680VBZbe
a3681DTa
Technical3682NPTechnical
Advice3683NPAdvice
Memorandum3684NPMemorandum
from3685INfrom
19803686CD@card@
dealing3687VVGdeal
specifically3688RBspecifically
with3689INwith
FELA3690NPFela
judgments3691NNSjudgment
saying3692VVGsay
,3693,,
again3694RBagain
,3695,,
they3696PPthey
have3697VHPhave
to3698TOto
be3699VBbe
paid3700VVNpay
.3701SENT.
I3702PPI
think3703VVPthink
the3704DTthe
difficulty3705NNdifficulty
that3706WDTthat
may3707MDmay
arise3708VVarise
is3709VBZbe
these3710DTthese
are3711VBPbe
suits3712NNSsuit
that3713WDTthat
occur3714VVPoccur
between3715INbetween
not3716RBnot
the3717DTthe
IRS3718NPIRS
but3719CCbut
between3720INbetween
a3721DTa
railroad3722NNrailroad
employee3723NNemployee
and3724CCand
an3725DTan
employer3726NNemployer
.3727SENT.
And3728CCand
I3729PPI
think3730VVPthink
what3731WPwhat
the3732DTthe
affidavit3733NNaffidavit
on3734INon
the3735DTthe
other3736JJother
side3737NNside
is3738VBZbe
asserting3739VVGassert
is3740VBZbe
that3741IN/thatthat
railroads3742NNSrailroad
may3743MDmay
essentially3744RBessentially
not3745RBnot
have3746VHPhave
been3747VBNbe
complying3748VVGcomply
in3749INin
some3750DTsome
cases3751NNScase
,3752,,
I3753PPI
do3754VVPdo
n't3755RBn't
know3756VVknow
how3757WRBhow
many3758JJmany
cases3759NNScase
,3760,,
with3761INwith
the3762DTthe
IRS3763NPIRS
's3764POS's
regulations3765NNSregulation
.3766SENT.
And3767CCand
if3768INif
that3769DTthat
...3770:...
if3771INif
that3772WDTthat
has3773VHZhave
happened3774VVNhappen
,3775,,
it3776PPit
's3777VBZbe
contrary3778JJcontrary
to3779TOto
our3780PP$our
regulations3781NNSregulation
.3782SENT.
It3783PPit
's3784VBZbe
not3785RBnot
something3786NNsomething
we3787PPwe
've3788VHPhave
necessarily3789RBnecessarily
known3790VVNknow
about3791RBabout
because3792INbecause
it3793PPit
's3794VBZbe
a3795DTa
suit3796NNsuit
between3797INbetween
a3798DTa
taxpayer3799NNtaxpayer
and3800CCand
a3801DTa
railroad3802NNrailroad
,3803,,
and3804CCand
if3805INif
neither3806CCneither
of3807INof
them3808PPthem
reports3809VVZreport
it3810PPit
,3811,,
it3812PPit
may3813MDmay
be3814VBbe
that3815IN/thatthat
there3816EXthere
are3817VBPbe
cases3818NNScase
where3819WRBwhere
,3820,,
you3821PPyou
know3822VVPknow
,3823,,
the3824DTthe
IRS3825NPIRS
has3826VHZhave
n't3827RBn't
been3828VBNbe
aware3829JJaware
of3830INof
,3831,,
has3832VHZhave
n't3833RBn't
gone3834VVNgo
after3835INafter
that3836DTthat
money3837NNmoney
.3838SENT.
But3839CCbut
the3840DTthe
IRS3841NPIRS
...3842:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]3843LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
The3844NPThe
...3845:...
the3846DTthe
...3847:...
the3848DTthe
railroad3849NNrailroad
pays3850VVZpay
...3851:...
pays3852VVZpay
the3853DTthe
full3854JJfull
tax3855NNtax
but3856CCbut
charges3857VVZcharge
the3858DTthe
...3859:...
the3860DTthe
railroad3861NNrailroad
worker3862NNworker
for3863INfor
his3864PP$his
or3865CCor
her3866PP$her
share3867NNshare
?3868SENT?
Is3869VBZbe
that3870IN/thatthat
how3871WRBhow
it3872PPit
works3873VVZwork
?3874SENT?
[MS. KOVNER]3875LOC[MS. KOVNER]
That3876DTthat
's3877VBZbe
right3878JJright
.3879SENT.
The3880DTthe
IRS3881NPIRS
...3882:...
the3883DTthe
railroad3884NNrailroad
is3885VBZbe
required3886VVNrequire
to3887TOto
withhold3888VVwithhold
both3889DTboth
...3890:...
to3891TOto
withhold3892VVwithhold
from3893INfrom
the3894DTthe
employee3895NNemployee
's3896POS's
pay3897NNpay
the3898DTthe
employee3899NNemployee
's3900POS's
share3901NNshare
,3902,,
and3903CCand
then3904RBthen
it3905PPit
pays3906VVZpay
both3907DTboth
shares3908NNSshare
.3909SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]3910LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I3911PPI
would3912MDwould
be3913VBbe
curious3914JJcurious
,3915,,
your3916PP$your
answer3917NNanswer
to3918TOto
Justice3919NPJustice
Sotomayor3920NPSotomayor
and3921CCand
Justice3922NPJustice
Kagan3923NPKagan
's3924POS's
questions3925NNSquestion
earlier3926RBRearlier
.3927SENT.
So3928RBso
what3929WPwhat
do3930VVPdo
we3931PPwe
do3932VVPdo
about3933INabout
a3934DTa
general3935JJgeneral
verdict3936NNverdict
where3937WRBwhere
there3938EXthere
's3939VBZbe
no3940DTno
allocation3941NNallocation
between3942INbetween
what3943WPwhat
might3944MDmight
be3945VBbe
later3946RBRlater
thought3947VVNthink
by3948INby
some3949DTsome
to3950TOto
be3951VBbe
compensation3952NNcompensation
for3953INfor
lost3954JJlost
services3955NNSservice
and3956CCand
other3957JJother
...3958:...
other3959JJother
things3960NNSthing
?3961SENT?
What3962WPWhat
do3963VVPdo
we3964PPwe
do3965VVPdo
about3966INabout
pain3967NNpain
and3968CCand
suffering3969NNsuffering
,3970,,
which3971WDTwhich
might3972MDmight
be3973VBbe
classified3974VVNclassify
as3975INas
compensation3976NNcompensation
for3977INfor
lost3978VVNlose
time3979NNtime
as3980INas
well3981RBwell
?3982SENT?
What3983WPWhat
's3984VBZbe
the3985DTthe
government3986NNgovernment
's3987POS's
view3988NNview
on3989INon
those3990DTthose
complications3991NNScomplication
?3992SENT?
[MS. KOVNER]3993LOC[MS. KOVNER]
Yeah3994NPYeah
.3995SENT.
So3996RBso
,3997,,
I3998PPI
mean3999VVPmean
,4000,,
taking4001VVGtake
the4002DTthe
...4003:...
the4004DTthe
first4005JJfirst
question4006NNquestion
first4007RBfirst
,4008,,
the4009DTthe
what4010WPwhat
if4011INif
there4012EXthere
's4013VBZbe
no4014DTno
allocation4015NNallocation
,4016,,
I4017PPI
...4018:...
I4019PPI
agree4020VVPagree
with4021INwith
the4022DTthe
articulation4023NNarticulation
by4024INby
my4025PP$my
friend4026NNfriend
on4027INon
the4028DTthe
railroad4029NNrailroad
side4030NNside
that4031IN/thatthat
if4032INif
there4033EXthere
's4034VBZbe
no4035DTno
allocation4036NNallocation
at4037INat
all4038DTall
...4039:...
and4040CCand
there4041EXthere
's4042VBZbe
some4043DTsome
material4044NNmaterial
that4045WDTthat
is4046VBZbe
in4047INin
the4048DTthe
JA4049NPJa
,4050,,
there4051EXthere
's4052VBZbe
sort4053NNsort
of4054INof
detailed4055JJdetailed
guidance4056NNguidance
on4057INon
allocation4058NNallocation
from4059INfrom
the4060DTthe
RRB4061NPRRB
...4062:...
but4063CCbut
I4064PPI
think4065VVPthink
if4066INif
there4067EXthere
is4068VBZbe
no4069DTno
allocation4070NNallocation
,4071,,
the4072DTthe
presumption4073NNpresumption
is4074VBZbe
it4075PPit
's4076VBZbe
going4077VVGgo
to4078TOto
be4079VBbe
treated4080VVNtreat
as4081INas
time4082NNtime
lost4083VVDlose
.4084SENT.
I4085PPI
think4086VVPthink
the4087DTthe
RRB4088NPRRB
says4089VVZsay
,4090,,
nonetheless4091RBnonetheless
,4092,,
the4093DTthe
employer4094NNemployer
and4095CCand
the4096DTthe
employee4097NNemployee
are4098VBPbe
allowed4099VVNallow
to4100TOto
come4101VVcome
in4102INin
even4103RBeven
after4104INafter
the4105DTthe
judgment4106NNjudgment
and4107CCand
allocate4108VVallocate
it4109PPit
between4110INbetween
time4111NNtime
lost4112VVDlose
and4113CCand
...4114:...
and4115CCand
other4116JJother
sources4117NNSsource
.4118SENT.
And4119CCand
we4120PPwe
think4121VVPthink
,4122,,
you4123PPyou
know4124VVPknow
,4125,,
that4126WDTthat
's4127VBZbe
...4128:...
that4129WDTthat
's4130VBZbe
what's4131JJwhat's
...4132:...
h4133NNh
(4134((
24135CD2
)4136))
,4137,,
which4138WDTwhich
is4139VBZbe
still4140RBstill
in4141INin
the4142DTthe
RRA4143NPRRA
,4144,,
suggests4145VVZsuggest
is4146VBZbe
the4147DTthe
appropriate4148JJappropriate
way4149NNway
to4150TOto
handle4151VVhandle
this4152DTthis
.4153SENT.
And4154CCand
I4155PPI
think4156VVPthink
h4157NNh
(4158((
24159CD2
)4160))
is4161VBZbe
also4162RBalso
the4163DTthe
part4164NNpart
of4165INof
the4166DTthe
answer4167NNanswer
on4168INon
pain4169NNpain
and4170CCand
suffering4171NNsuffering
.4172SENT.
h4173NNh
(4174((
24175CD2
)4176))
clearly4177RBclearly
contemplates4178VVZcontemplate
that4179IN/thatthat
when4180WRBwhen
you4181PPyou
have4182VHPhave
a4183DTa
judgment4184NNjudgment
,4185,,
it4186PPit
's4187VBZbe
going4188VVGgo
to4189TOto
contain4190VVcontain
in4191INin
part4192NNpart
taxable4193JJtaxable
payments4194NNSpayment
for4195INfor
time4196NNtime
lost4197VVNlose
and4198CCand
also4199RBalso
other4200JJother
kinds4201NNSkind
of4202INof
damages4203NNSdamage
and4204CCand
that4205IN/thatthat
you4206PPyou
're4207VBPbe
going4208VVGgo
to4209TOto
need4210VVneed
to4211TOto
divide4212VVdivide
these4213DTthese
two4214CDtwo
things4215NNSthing
up4216RBup
to4217TOto
figure4218VVfigure
out4219RPout
,4220,,
you4221PPyou
know4222VVPknow
,4223,,
what4224WPwhat
's4225VBZbe
compensation4226NNcompensation
.4227SENT.
And4228CCand
we4229PPwe
think4230VVPthink
there4231EXthere
's4232VBZbe
a4233DTa
common-sense4234JJcommon-sense
reason4235NNreason
for4236INfor
treating4237VVGtreat
pain4238NNpain
and4239CCand
suffering4240NNsuffering
as4241INas
different4242JJdifferent
,4243,,
which4244WDTwhich
is4245VBZbe
lost4246VVNlose
...4247:...
lost4248VVNlose
time4249NNtime
payments4250NNSpayment
are4251VBPbe
a4252DTa
substitute4253NNsubstitute
for4254INfor
something4255NNsomething
that4256WDTthat
's4257VBZbe
taxable4258JJtaxable
.4259SENT.
They4260PPthey
're4261VBPbe
a4262DTa
substitute4263NNsubstitute
for4264INfor
wages4265NNSwage
that4266WDTthat
...4267:...
that4268IN/thatthat
the4269DTthe
employee4270NNemployee
would4271MDwould
have4272VHhave
been4273VBNbe
taxed4274VVNtax
on4275RPon
.4276SENT.
And4277CCand
they4278PPthey
're4279VBPbe
getting4280VVGget
credited4281VVNcredit
to4282TOto
your4283PP$your
benefits4284NNSbenefit
on4285INon
the4286DTthe
RRB4287NPRRB
side4288NNside
.4289SENT.
In4290INin
contrast4291NNcontrast
,4292,,
a4293DTa
pain4294NNpain
and4295CCand
suffering4296NNsuffering
judgment4297NNjudgment
is4298VBZbe
essentially4299RBessentially
putting4300VVGput
you4301PPyou
in4302INin
the4303DTthe
place4304NNplace
you4305PPyou
would4306MDwould
be4307VBbe
if4308INif
you4309PPyou
had4310VHDhave
n't4311RBn't
lost4312VVNlose
some4313DTsome
sort4314NNsort
of4315INof
psychic4316JJpsychic
or4317CCor
physical4318JJphysical
well-being4319NNwell-being
that4320WDTthat
would4321MDwould
n't4322RBn't
have4323VHhave
been4324VBNbe
taxed4325VVNtax
.4326SENT.
So4327RBso
we4328PPwe
think4329VVPthink
it4330PPit
's4331VBZbe
understandable4332JJunderstandable
that4333IN/thatthat
Congress4334NPCongress
,4335,,
in4336INin
making4337VVGmake
those4338DTthose
sort4339NNsort
of4340INof
changes4341NNSchange
that4342WDTthat
make4343VVPmake
clear4344JJclear
that4345IN/thatthat
time4346NNtime
lost4347VVDlose
and4348CCand
pain4349NNpain
and4350CCand
suffering4351NNsuffering
are4352VBPbe
treated4353VVNtreat
differently4354RBdifferently
in4355INin
19464356CD@card@
,4357,,
we4358PPwe
think4359VVPthink
it4360PPit
's4361VBZbe
...4362:...
it4363PPit
makes4364VVZmake
sense4365NNsense
that4366IN/thatthat
Congress4367NPCongress
thought4368VVDthink
of4369INof
these4370DTthese
two4371CDtwo
things4372NNSthing
as4373INas
different4374JJdifferent
as4375INas
one4376PPone
is4377VBZbe
taxable4378JJtaxable
and4379CCand
one4380PPone
is4381VBZbe
not4382RBnot
.4383SENT.
And4384CCand
if4385INif
you4386PPyou
look4387VVPlook
at4388INat
the4389DTthe
history4390NNhistory
of4391INof
those4392DTthose
19464393CD@card@
changes4394NNSchange
,4395,,
I4396PPI
think4397VVPthink
that4398WDTthat
's4399VBZbe
...4400:...
that4401WDTthat
's4402VBZbe
sort4403NNsort
of4404INof
the4405DTthe
...4406:...
the4407DTthe
distinction4408NNdistinction
that4409WDTthat
's4410VBZbe
being4411VBGbe
reflected4412VVNreflect
in4413INin
the4414DTthe
history4415NNhistory
too4416RBtoo
.4417SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4418LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Ms4419NNMs
.4420SENT.
Kovner4421NPKovner
,4422,,
one4423CDone
of4424INof
the4425DTthe
things4426NNSthing
that4427WDTthat
strikes4428VVZstrike
me4429PPme
as4430INas
a4431DTa
little4432JJlittle
bit4433NNbit
odd4434JJodd
about4435INabout
an4436DTan
award4437NNaward
like4438INlike
this4439DTthis
fitting4440NNfitting
into4441INinto
the4442DTthe
"4443``"
services4444NNSservice
rendered4445VVDrender
"4446``"
language4447NNlanguage
is4448VBZbe
that4449IN/thatthat
,4450,,
unlike4451INunlike
most4452JJSmost
kinds4453NNSkind
of4454INof
compensation4455NNcompensation
that4456IN/thatthat
you4457PPyou
can4458MDcan
think4459VVthink
of4460INof
,4461,,
you4462PPyou
could4463MDcould
get4464VVget
this4465DTthis
if4466INif
you4467PPyou
were4468VBDbe
injured4469VVNinjure
your4470PP$your
first4471JJfirst
hour4472NNhour
on4473INon
the4474DTthe
job4475NNjob
without4476INwithout
having4477VHGhave
worked4478VVNwork
at4479INat
all4480DTall
,4481,,
without4482INwithout
having4483VHGhave
rendered4484VVNrender
any4485DTany
services4486NNSservice
at4487INat
all4488DTall
.4489SENT.
[MS. KOVNER]4490LOC[MS. KOVNER]
Yeah4491NPYeah
.4492SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4493LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So4494INso
what4495WPwhat
about4496INabout
that4497DTthat
?4498SENT?
[MS. KOVNER]4499LOC[MS. KOVNER]
Well4500UHwell
,4501,,
I4502PPI
think4503VVPthink
there4504EXthere
are4505VBPbe
a4506DTa
number4507NNnumber
of4508INof
forms4509NNSform
of4510INof
compensation4511NNcompensation
that4512WDTthat
operate4513VVPoperate
like4514INlike
that4515DTthat
.4516SENT.
You4517PPyou
know4518VVPknow
,4519,,
so4520RBso
...4521:...
so4522RBso
one4523CDone
example4524NNexample
that4525IN/thatthat
Nierotko4526NPNierotko
gave4527VVDgive
is4528VBZbe
something4529NNsomething
that4530WDTthat
would4531MDwould
be4532VBbe
compensation4533NNcompensation
in4534INin
that4535WDTthat
it4536PPit
was4537VBDbe
thinking4538VVGthink
of4539INof
is4540VBZbe
like4541INlike
payment4542NNpayment
for4543INfor
when4544WRBwhen
you4545PPyou
're4546VBPbe
required4547VVNrequire
to4548TOto
be4549VBbe
paid4550VVNpay
for4551INfor
jury4552NNjury
service4553NNservice
.4554SENT.
I4555PPI
mean4556VVPmean
,4557,,
that4558WDTthat
's4559VBZbe
a4560DTa
benefit4561NNbenefit
you4562PPyou
would4563MDwould
be4564VBbe
entitled4565VVNentitle
to4566TOto
on4567INon
day4568NNday
one4569CDone
.4570SENT.
It4571PPit
does4572VVZdo
n't4573RBn't
necessarily4574RBnecessarily
correlate4575VVPcorrelate
to4576TOto
hours4577NNShour
you4578PPyou
work4579VVPwork
,4580,,
but4581CCbut
it4582PPit
's4583VBZbe
a4584DTa
benefit4585NNbenefit
you4586PPyou
get4587VVPget
as4588INas
an4589DTan
employee4590NNemployee
.4591SENT.
Another4592DTanother
example4593NNexample
would4594MDwould
be4595VBbe
like4596INlike
maternity4597NNmaternity
leave4598NNleave
,4599,,
sick4600JJsick
leave4601NNleave
in4602INin
certain4603JJcertain
kinds4604NNSkind
of4605INof
circumstances4606NNScircumstance
.4607SENT.
I4608PPI
think4609VVPthink
there4610EXthere
are4611VBPbe
a4612DTa
whole4613JJwhole
bunch4614NNbunch
of4615INof
benefits4616NNSbenefit
that4617IN/thatthat
you4618PPyou
get4619VVPget
as4620INas
part4621NNpart
of4622INof
your4623PP$your
sort4624NNsort
of4625INof
employee4626NNemployee
compensation4627NNcompensation
that4628WDTthat
do4629VVPdo
n't4630RBn't
exactly4631RBexactly
correlate4632JJcorrelate
to4633TOto
individual4634JJindividual
hours4635NNShour
that4636IN/thatthat
you4637PPyou
work4638VVPwork
.4639SENT.
And4640CCand
even4641RBeven
setting4642VVGset
aside4643RPaside
all4644PDTall
these4645DTthese
,4646,,
you4647PPyou
know4648VVPknow
,4649,,
textual4650JJtextual
and4651CCand
...4652:...
and4653CCand
precedential4654JJprecedential
indicators4655NNSindicator
,4656,,
you4657PPyou
know4658VVPknow
,4659,,
we4660PPwe
would4661MDwould
note4662VVnote
that4663IN/thatthat
this4664DTthis
has4665VHZhave
been4666VBNbe
the4667DTthe
position4668NNposition
of4669INof
the4670DTthe
agency4671NNagency
since4672INsince
the4673DTthe
statute4674NNstatute
was4675VBDbe
enacted4676VVNenact
in4677INin
19374678CD@card@
.4679SENT.
Congress4680NPCongress
amend4681VVPamend
...4682:...
has4683VHZhave
amended4684VVNamend
this4685DTthis
statute4686NNstatute
many4687JJmany
times4688NNStime
against4689INagainst
that4690DTthat
backdrop4691NNbackdrop
,4692,,
and4693CCand
it4694PPit
has4695VHZhave
n't4696RBn't
chosen4697VVNchoose
to4698TOto
change4699VVchange
that4700DTthat
agency4701NNagency
interpretation4702NNinterpretation
.4703SENT.
So4704RBso
we4705PPwe
think4706VVPthink
this4707DTthis
is4708VBZbe
a4709DTa
...4710:...
you4711PPyou
know4712VVPknow
,4713,,
an4714DTan
interpretation4715NNinterpretation
that4716WDTthat
's4717VHZhave
informed4718VVNinform
what4719WPwhat
Congress4720NPCongress
has4721VHZhave
done4722VVNdo
.4723SENT.
It4724PPit
's4725VHZhave
added4726VVNadd
exclusions4727NNSexclusion
that4728WDTthat
do4729VVPdo
n't4730RBn't
really4731RBreally
make4732VVmake
sense4733NNsense
unless4734INunless
time4735NNtime
lost4736VVNlose
is4737VBZbe
covered4738VVNcover
without4739INwithout
changing4740VVGchange
the4741DTthe
agency4742NNagency
's4743POS's
interpretation4744NNinterpretation
.4745SENT.
So4746RBso
,4747,,
under4748INunder
principles4749NNSprinciple
of4750INof
acquiescence4751NNacquiescence
and4752CCand
Chevron4753NPChevron
deference4754NNdeference
,4755,,
if4756INif
there4757EXthere
were4758VBDbe
ambiguity4759NNambiguity
,4760,,
we4761PPwe
think4762VVPthink
the4763DTthe
agency4764NNagency
's4765POS's
interpretation4766NNinterpretation
would4767MDwould
control4768VVcontrol
.4769SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4770LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
But4771CCbut
you4772PPyou
actually4773RBactually
do4774VVPdo
n't4775RBn't
think4776VVthink
there4777EXthere
's4778VBZbe
ambiguity4779NNambiguity
?4780SENT?
[MS. KOVNER]4781LOC[MS. KOVNER]
We4782PPwe
do4783VVPdo
n't4784RBn't
.4785SENT.
We4786PPwe
think4787VVPthink
this4788DTthis
is4789VBZbe
a4790DTa
clear4791JJclear
case4792NNcase
.4793SENT.
If4794INif
there4795EXthere
are4796VBPbe
no4797RBno
further4798JJRfurther
questions4799NNSquestion
,4800,,
we4801PPwe
would4802MDwould
ask4803VVask
the4804DTthe
judgment4805NNjudgment
below4806RBbelow
be4807VBbe
reversed4808VVNreverse
.4809SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4810LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank4811VVthank
you4812PPyou
,4813,,
counsel4814NNcounsel
.4815SENT.
Mr4816NPMr
.4817SENT.
Frederick4818NPFrederick
.4819SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]4820LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Thank4821VVthank
you4822PPyou
,4823,,
Mr4824NPMr
.4825SENT.
Chief4826NPChief
Justice4827NPJustice
,4828,,
and4829CCand
may4830MDmay
it4831PPit
please4832VVplease
the4833DTthe
Court4834NPCourt
:4835::
At4836INat
issue4837NNissue
in4838INin
this4839DTthis
case4840NNcase
is4841VBZbe
whether4842INwhether
the4843DTthe
Court4844NPCourt
construes4845VVZconstrue
the4846DTthe
statute4847NNstatute
as4848INas
it4849PPit
's4850VBZbe
currently4851RBcurrently
written4852VVNwrite
or4853CCor
whether4854INwhether
you4855PPyou
construe4856VVPconstrue
it4857PPit
the4858DTthe
way4859NNway
the4860DTthe
other4861JJother
side4862NNside
would4863MDwould
like4864VVlike
it4865PPit
to4866TOto
read4867VVread
.4868SENT.
Our4869PP$our
position4870NNposition
is4871VBZbe
that4872IN/thatthat
the4873DTthe
plain4874JJplain
language4875NNlanguage
controls4876NNScontrol
and4877CCand
that4878IN/thatthat
the4879DTthe
statute4880NNstatute
now4881RBnow
in4882INin
effect4883NNeffect
does4884VVZdo
not4885RBnot
contain4886VVcontain
all4887PDTall
the4888DTthe
words4889NNSword
and4890CCand
extra4891JJextra
provisions4892NNSprovision
that4893WDTthat
get4894VVPget
you4895PPyou
to4896TOto
a4897DTa
place4898NNplace
where4899WRBwhere
"4900``"
services4901NNSservice
rendered4902VVDrender
"4903``"
means4904VVZmean
not4905RBnot
services4906NNSservice
rendered4907VVNrender
,4908,,
which4909WDTwhich
is4910VBZbe
the4911DTthe
core4912NNcore
of4913INof
the4914DTthe
other4915JJother
side4916NNside
's4917POS's
position4918NNposition
.4919SENT.
"4920''"
Services4921NNSservice
rendered4922VVDrender
"4923``"
has4924VHZhave
a4925DTa
very4926RBvery
plain4927JJplain
meaning4928NNmeaning
.4929SENT.
It4930PPit
is4931VBZbe
providing4932VVGprovide
work4933NNwork
under4934INunder
the4935DTthe
supervision4936NNsupervision
of4937INof
another4938DTanother
person4939NNperson
.4940SENT.
When4941WRBwhen
Mr4942NPMr
.4943SENT.
Loos4944NNSloo
was4945VBDbe
injured4946VVNinjure
here4947RBhere
,4948,,
he4949PPhe
was4950VBDbe
unable4951JJunable
to4952TOto
provide4953VVprovide
services4954NNSservice
.4955SENT.
That4956DTthat
was4957VBDbe
the4958DTthe
whole4959JJwhole
point4960NNpoint
of4961INof
him4962PPhim
bringing4963VVGbring
his4964PP$his
FELA4965NPFela
claim4966NNclaim
.4967SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4968LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well4969UHWell
,4970,,
but4971CCbut
he4972PPhe
had4973VHDhave
provide4974VVprovide
serve4975VVserve
...4976:...
provided4977VVNprovide
services4978NNSservice
,4979,,
and4980CCand
that4981DTthat
is4982VBZbe
what4983WPwhat
entitled4984VVDentitle
him4985PPhim
to4986TOto
the4987DTthe
payments4988NNSpayment
that4989IN/thatthat
he4990PPhe
received4991VVDreceive
.4992SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]4993LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Incorrect4994JJincorrect
,4995,,
Mr4996NPMr
.4997SENT.
Chief4998NPChief
Justice4999NPJustice
.5000SENT.
What5001WPWhat
entitled5002VVDentitle
him5003PPhim
to5004TOto
the5005DTthe
payments5006NNSpayment
that5007IN/thatthat
he5008PPhe
received5009VVDreceive
was5010VBDbe
that5011IN/thatthat
he5012PPhe
could5013MDcould
n't5014RBn't
work5015VVwork
.5016SENT.
And5017CCand
it5018PPit
was5019VBDbe
the5020DTthe
railroad5021NNrailroad
's5022POS's
negligence5023NNnegligence
...5024:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5025LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well5026UHwell
,5027,,
it5028PPit
's5029VBZbe
not5030RBnot
just5031RBjust
somebody5032NNsomebody
off5033INoff
the5034DTthe
street5035NNstreet
who5036WPwho
could5037MDcould
n't5038RBn't
work5039VVwork
.5040SENT.
It5041PPit
was5042VBDbe
an5043DTan
employee5044NNemployee
who5045WPwho
could5046MDcould
n't5047RBn't
work5048VVwork
,5049,,
and5050CCand
he5051PPhe
was5052VBDbe
an5053DTan
employee5054NNemployee
because5055INbecause
he5056PPhe
had5057VHDhave
rendered5058VVNrender
services5059NNSservice
.5060SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]5061LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Right5062RBright
.5063SENT.
But5064CCbut
he5065PPhe
had5066VHDhave
n't5067RBn't
rendered5068VVNrender
the5069DTthe
services5070NNSservice
.5071SENT.
That5072DTthat
's5073VBZbe
the5074DTthe
whole5075JJwhole
point5076NNpoint
.5077SENT.
He5078PPhe
was5079VBDbe
unable5080JJunable
to5081TOto
render5082VVrender
the5083DTthe
services5084NNSservice
because5085INbecause
he5086PPhe
was5087VBDbe
hurt5088VVNhurt
.5089SENT.
So5090RBso
let5091VVlet
me5092PPme
explain5093VVexplain
a5094DTa
little5095JJlittle
bit5096NNbit
about5097INabout
how5098WRBhow
day5099NNday
call5100NNcall
works5101VVZwork
in5102INin
a5103DTa
union5104NNunion
hall5105NNhall
.5106SENT.
Here5107RBhere
,5108,,
Mr5109NPMr
.5110SENT.
Loos5111NNSloo
was5112VBDbe
subject5113JJsubject
under5114INunder
the5115DTthe
union5116NNunion
terms5117NNSterm
to5118TOto
be5119VBbe
in5120INin
a5121DTa
union5122NNunion
hall5123NNhall
,5124,,
and5125CCand
if5126INif
he5127PPhe
's5128VBZbe
called5129VVNcall
in5130INin
to5131TOto
a5132DTa
crew5133NNcrew
,5134,,
he5135PPhe
makes5136VVZmake
money5137NNmoney
.5138SENT.
He5139PPhe
gets5140VVZget
paid5141VVNpay
for5142INfor
that5143DTthat
day5144NNday
.5145SENT.
If5146INif
he5147PPhe
's5148VBZbe
unable5149JJunable
to5150TOto
make5151VVmake
it5152PPit
to5153TOto
the5154DTthe
union5155NNunion
hall5156NNhall
because5157INbecause
he5158PPhe
's5159VBZbe
injured5160VVNinjure
,5161,,
it5162PPit
's5163VHZhave
considered5164VVNconsider
nothing5165NNnothing
.5166SENT.
He5167PPhe
does5168VVZdo
n't5169RBn't
get5170VVget
paid5171VVNpay
for5172INfor
that5173DTthat
,5174,,
he5175PPhe
does5176VVZdo
n't5177RBn't
accrue5178VVaccrue
any5179DTany
vacation5180NNvacation
pay5181NNpay
for5182INfor
that5183DTthat
.5184SENT.
And5185CCand
the5186DTthe
whole5187JJwhole
point5188NNpoint
of5189INof
the5190DTthe
FELA5191NPFela
judgment5192NNjudgment
here5193RBhere
was5194VBDbe
that5195IN/thatthat
because5196INbecause
he5197PPhe
was5198VBDbe
injured5199VVNinjure
,5200,,
he5201PPhe
was5202VBDbe
n't5203RBn't
able5204JJable
to5205TOto
be5206VBbe
in5207INin
the5208DTthe
union5209NNunion
hall5210NNhall
at5211INat
the5212DTthe
time5213NNtime
the5214DTthe
railroad5215NNrailroad
called5216VVNcall
for5217INfor
people5218NNSpeople
to5219TOto
serve5220VVserve
on5221INon
their5222PP$their
crews5223NNScrew
.5224SENT.
So5225RBso
,5226,,
if5227INif
you5228PPyou
were5229VBDbe
to5230TOto
suppose5231VVsuppose
that5232DTthat
Mr5233NNMr
.5234SENT.
Loos5235NNSloo
was5236VBDbe
walking5237VVGwalk
along5238RPalong
at5239INat
the5240DTthe
time5241NNtime
he5242PPhe
was5243VBDbe
injured5244VVNinjure
and5245CCand
he5246PPhe
was5247VBDbe
with5248INwith
a5249DTa
non-railroad5250NNnon-railroad
employee5251NNemployee
,5252,,
and5253CCand
suppose5254VVPsuppose
that5255IN/thatthat
non-railroad5256NNnon-railroad
employee5257NNemployee
was5258VBDbe
with5259INwith
a5260DTa
coal5261NNcoal
company5262NNcompany
and5263CCand
they5264PPthey
both5265CCboth
fell5266VVDfall
into5267INinto
the5268DTthe
drainage5269NNdrainage
part5270NNpart
...5271:...
pit5272NNpit
because5273INbecause
of5274INof
the5275DTthe
negligence5276NNnegligence
of5277INof
the5278DTthe
railroad5279NNrailroad
,5280,,
you5281PPyou
would5282MDwould
n't5283RBn't
say5284VVsay
that5285IN/thatthat
the5286DTthe
past5287JJpast
wages5288NNSwage
or5289CCor
the5290DTthe
lost5291VVNlose
wages5292NNSwage
that5293IN/thatthat
the5294DTthe
coal5295NNcoal
company5296NNcompany
employee5297NNemployee
suffered5298VVNsuffer
by5299INby
the5300DTthe
railroad5301NNrailroad
's5302POS's
negligence5303NNnegligence
was5304VBDbe
"5305``"
for5306INfor
services5307NNSservice
rendered5308VVNrender
.5309SENT.
"5310``"
You5311PPyou
would5312MDwould
n't5313RBn't
say5314VVsay
that5315IN/thatthat
at5316INat
all5317DTall
.5318SENT.
There5319EXthere
would5320MDwould
be5321VBbe
no5322DTno
basis5323NNbasis
for5324INfor
saying5325VVGsay
that5326DTthat
.5327SENT.
And5328CCand
so5329RBso
it5330PPit
's5331VBZbe
odd5332JJodd
to5333TOto
suppose5334VVsuppose
that5335IN/thatthat
simply5336RBsimply
because5337INbecause
Mr5338NPMr
.5339SENT.
Loos5340NPLoos
is5341VBZbe
capable5342JJcapable
or5343CCor
subject5344JJsubject
to5345TOto
being5346VBGbe
called5347VVNcall
into5348INinto
a5349DTa
duty5350NNduty
status5351NNstatus
for5352INfor
the5353DTthe
crew5354NNcrew
that5355IN/thatthat
you5356PPyou
...5357:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5358LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But5359CCbut
a5360DTa
lot5361NNlot
of5362INof
these5363DTthese
...5364:...
[MR. FREDERICK]5365LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
...5366:...
that5367IN/thatthat
you5368PPyou
would5369MDwould
treat5370VVtreat
him5371PPhim
any5372DTany
differently5373RBdifferently
.5374SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5375LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...5376:...
kind5377NNkind
of5378INof
arguments5379NNSargument
were5380VBDbe
made5381VVNmake
in5382INin
Nierotko5383NPNierotko
,5384,,
and5385CCand
the5386DTthe
Court5387NPCourt
rejected5388VVDreject
those5389DTthose
in5390INin
the5391DTthe
...5392:...
admittedly5393RBadmittedly
,5394,,
in5395INin
the5396DTthe
context5397NNcontext
of5398INof
the5399DTthe
Social5400NPSocial
Security5401NPSecurity
Act5402NPAct
,5403,,
but5404CCbut
why5405WRBwhy
not5406RBnot
follow5407VVfollow
the5408DTthe
same5409JJsame
interpretation5410NNinterpretation
here5411RBhere
?5412SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]5413LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Well5414UHWell
,5415,,
what5416WPwhat
the5417DTthe
Court5418NPCourt
in5419INin
Nierotko5420NPNierotko
did5421VVDdo
was5422VBDbe
it5423PPit
construed5424VVDconstrue
the5425DTthe
benefits5426NNSbenefit
statute5427NNstatute
.5428SENT.
And5429CCand
what5430WPwhat
Cleveland5431NPCleveland
Indians5432NPSIndians
says5433VVZsay
and5434CCand
is5435VBZbe
absolutely5436RBabsolutely
clear5437JJclear
is5438VBZbe
that5439IN/thatthat
you5440PPyou
do5441VVPdo
not5442RBnot
construe5443VVconstrue
the5444DTthe
tax5445NNtax
statute5446NNstatute
the5447DTthe
same5448JJsame
as5449INas
the5450DTthe
benefits5451NNSbenefit
statute5452NNstatute
.5453SENT.
The5454DTthe
...5455:...
the5456DTthe
case5457NNcase
of5458INof
Hisquierdo5459NNHisquierdo
...5460:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5461LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
The5462DTthe
Cleveland5463NPCleveland
Indians5464NPSIndians
was5465VBDbe
about5466RBabout
the5467DTthe
allocation5468NNallocation
time5469NNtime
period5470NNperiod
.5471SENT.
It5472PPit
was5473VBDbe
n't5474RBn't
about5475INabout
the5476DTthe
main5477JJmain
holding5478NNholding
of5479INof
Nierotko5480NPNierotko
in5481INin
terms5482NNSterm
of5483INof
how5484WRBhow
it5485PPit
departed5486VVDdepart
from5487INfrom
Nierotko5488NPNierotko
.5489SENT.
Is5490VBZbe
that5491DTthat
...5492:...
[MR. FREDERICK]5493LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Right5494RBright
.5495SENT.
But5496CCbut
the5497DTthe
interpretive5498JJinterpretive
method5499NNmethod
that5500IN/thatthat
the5501DTthe
Court5502NNcourt
employed5503VVNemploy
was5504VBDbe
different5505JJdifferent
in5506INin
the5507DTthe
sense5508NNsense
...5509:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5510LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
True5511NPTrue
.5512SENT.
But5513CCbut
the5514DTthe
precedent5515NNprecedent
on5516INon
point5517NNpoint
interprets5518VVZinterpret
...5519:...
says5520VVZsay
that5521IN/thatthat
time5522NNtime
lost5523VVNlose
is5524VBZbe
part5525NNpart
of5526INof
services5527NNSservice
rendered5528VVNrender
or5529CCor
services5530NNSservice
performed5531VVNperform
in5532INin
the5533DTthe
context5534NNcontext
of5535INof
the5536DTthe
Social5537NPSocial
Security5538NPSecurity
Act5539NPAct
.5540SENT.
So5541RBso
why5542WRBwhy
not5543RBnot
adhere5544VVadhere
to5545TOto
that5546DTthat
same5547JJsame
interpretation5548NNinterpretation
in5549INin
this5550DTthis
context5551NNcontext
at5552INat
this5553DTthis
point5554NNpoint
?5555SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]5556LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Because5557INbecause
this5558DTthis
Court5559NPCourt
,5560,,
to5561TOto
my5562PP$my
knowledge5563NNknowledge
,5564,,
has5565VHZhave
not5566RBnot
ever5567RBever
said5568VVDsay
that5569IN/thatthat
you5570PPyou
construe5571VVPconstrue
taxing5572VVGtax
statutes5573NNSstatute
by5574INby
looking5575VVGlook
at5576INat
benefits5577NNSbenefit
statutes5578NNSstatute
.5579SENT.
And5580CCand
that5581DTthat
is5582VBZbe
what5583WPwhat
...5584:...
exactly5585RBexactly
what5586WPwhat
Cleveland5587NPCleveland
Indians5588NPSIndians
holds5589VVZhold
.5590SENT.
That5591DTthat
's5592VBZbe
also5593RBalso
what5594WPwhat
the5595DTthe
case5596NNcase
of5597INof
Hisquierdo5598NPHisquierdo
holds5599VVZhold
.5600SENT.
Hisquierdo5601NNHisquierdo
is5602VBZbe
directly5603RBdirectly
on5604INon
point5605NNpoint
for5606INfor
the5607DTthe
Railroad5608NPRailroad
Retirement5609NPRetirement
Tax5610NPTax
Act5611NPAct
.5612SENT.
The5613DTthe
other5614JJother
side5615NNside
has5616VHZhave
no5617DTno
discussion5618NNdiscussion
about5619INabout
the5620DTthe
language5621NNlanguage
in5622INin
that5623DTthat
opinion5624NNopinion
,5625,,
which5626WDTwhich
says5627VVZsay
that5628IN/thatthat
RRTA5629NPRRTA
taxes5630NNStaxis
are5631VBPbe
to5632TOto
be5633VBbe
construed5634VVNconstrue
differently5635RBdifferently
than5636INthan
the5637DTthe
Railroad5638NPRailroad
Retirement5639NPRetirement
Board5640NPBoard
benefits5641NNSbenefit
.5642SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5643LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Mr5644NPMr
.5645SENT.
Frederick5646NPFrederick
,5647,,
your5648PP$your
argument5649NNargument
would5650MDwould
go5651VVgo
for5652INfor
the5653DTthe
railroad5654NNrailroad
as5655RBas
well5656RBwell
as5657INas
the5658DTthe
employee5659NNemployee
,5660,,
right5661RBright
?5662SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]5663LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Yes5664NPYes
.5665SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5666LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
So5667INso
this5668DTthis
...5669:...
this5670DTthis
railroad5671NNrailroad
paid5672VVDpay
a5673DTa
tax5674NNtax
that5675IN/thatthat
it5676PPit
was5677VBDbe
n't5678RBn't
required5679VVNrequire
to5680TOto
pay5681VVpay
,5682,,
could5683MDcould
it5684PPit
seek5685VVseek
a5686DTa
refund5687NNrefund
?5688SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]5689LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Yes5690NPYes
.5691SENT.
And5692CCand
,5693,,
in5694INin
fact5695NNfact
,5696,,
the5697DTthe
railroad5698NNrailroad
did5699VVDdo
n't5700RBn't
pay5701VVpay
the5702DTthe
tax5703NNtax
until5704INuntil
the5705DTthe
case5706NNcase
was5707VBDbe
on5708INon
appeal5709NNappeal
in5710INin
the5711DTthe
Eighth5712JJeighth
Circuit5713NNcircuit
.5714SENT.
It5715PPit
did5716VVDdo
not5717RBnot
pay5718VVpay
the5719DTthe
tax5720NNtax
,5721,,
you5722PPyou
know5723VVPknow
,5724,,
at5725INat
the5726DTthe
time5727NNtime
of5728INof
the5729DTthe
judgment5730NNjudgment
.5731SENT.
It5732PPit
waited5733VVDwait
as5734INas
a5735DTa
means5736NNSmean
,5737,,
presumably5738RBpresumably
,5739,,
to5740TOto
enhance5741VVenhance
the5742DTthe
persuasiveness5743NNpersuasiveness
of5744INof
its5745PP$its
argument5746NNargument
on5747INon
appeal5748NNappeal
.5749SENT.
Now5750RBnow
,5751,,
Justice5752NPJustice
Gorsuch5753NPGorsuch
,5754,,
I5755PPI
do5756VVPdo
want5757VVwant
to5758TOto
address5759VVaddress
your5760PP$your
workers5761NNSworker
'5762POS'
compensation5763NNcompensation
issue5764NNissue
.5765SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]5766LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I5767PPI
was5768VBDbe
...5769:...
I5770PPI
was5771VBDbe
going5772VVGgo
to5773TOto
ask5774VVask
you5775PPyou
if5776INif
you5777PPyou
'd5778MDwould
volunteer5779VVvolunteer
.5780SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]5781LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
And5782CCand
...5783:...
yes5784UHyes
.5785SENT.
There5786RBthere
...5787:...
there5788RBthere
...5789:...
let5790VVlet
me5791PPme
begin5792VVbegin
by5793INby
giving5794VVGgive
a5795DTa
little5796JJlittle
bit5797NNbit
of5798INof
history5799NNhistory
if5800INif
I5801PPI
could5802MDcould
.5803SENT.
The5804DTthe
FELA5805NPFela
was5806VBDbe
enacted5807VVNenact
prior5808RBprior
to5809TOto
most5810JJSmost
states5811NNSstate
enacting5812VVGenact
workers5813NNSworker
'5814POS'
compensation5815NNcompensation
statutes5816NNSstatute
,5817,,
and5818CCand
it5819PPit
has5820VHZhave
been5821VBNbe
held5822VVNhold
by5823INby
this5824DTthis
Court5825NPCourt
to5826TOto
preempt5827VVpreempt
the5828DTthe
FELA5829NPFela
,5830,,
to5831TOto
preempt5832VVpreempt
workers5833NNSworker
'5834POS'
compensation5835NNcompensation
statutes5836NNSstatute
.5837SENT.
So5838INso
the5839DTthe
only5840JJonly
time5841NNtime
where5842WRBwhere
there5843EXthere
's5844VBZbe
actually5845RBactually
an5846DTan
overlap5847VVPoverlap
is5848VBZbe
where5849WRBwhere
you5850PPyou
have5851VHPhave
a5852DTa
purely5853RBpurely
...5854:...
purely5855RBpurely
intra-state5856JJintra-state
railroad5857NNrailroad
.5858SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]5859LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
No5860NPNo
,5861,,
I5862PPI
follow5863VVPfollow
all5864DTall
of5865INof
that5866DTthat
.5867SENT.
And5868CCand
your5869PP$your
Footnote5870NNfootnote
95871CD9
was5872VBDbe
excellent5873JJexcellent
in5874INin
explaining5875VVGexplain
that5876DTthat
.5877SENT.
But5878CCbut
my5879PP$my
question5880NNquestion
still5881RBstill
remains5882VVZremain
,5883,,
if5884INif
a5885DTa
judgment5886NNjudgment
of5887INof
an5888DTan
administrative5889JJadministrative
agency5890NNagency
in5891INin
a5892DTa
state5893NNstate
setting5894NNsetting
,5895,,
in5896INin
an5897DTan
admittedly5898RBadmittedly
intra-state5899JJintra-state
accident5900NNaccident
is5901VBZbe
,5902,,
you5903PPyou
would5904MDwould
concede5905VVconcede
,5906,,
I5907PPI
believe5908VVPbelieve
,5909,,
compensation5910NNcompensation
for5911INfor
wages5912NNSwage
,5913,,
then5914RBthen
why5915RBwhy
...5916:...
why5917WRBwhy
would5918MDwould
n't5919RBn't
a5920DTa
federal5921JJfederal
inter-state5922NNinter-state
FELA5923NPFela
judgment5924NNjudgment
?5925SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]5926LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Worker5927NPWorker
's5928POS's
compensation5929NNcompensation
has5930VHZhave
always5931RBalways
been5932VBNbe
treated5933VVNtreat
differently5934RBdifferently
in5935INin
the5936DTthe
sense5937NNsense
that5938WDTthat
insure5939VVPinsure
...5940:...
the5941DTthe
employee5942NNemployee
and5943CCand
the5944DTthe
employer5945NNemployer
contributes5946VVZcontribute
to5947TOto
an5948DTan
insurance5949NNinsurance
fund5950NNfund
.5951SENT.
It5952PPit
's5953VBZbe
no5954DTno
fault5955NNfault
insurance5956NNinsurance
.5957SENT.
And5958CCand
for5959INfor
that5960DTthat
reason5961NNreason
,5962,,
it5963PPit
is5964VBZbe
more5965JJRmore
,5966,,
I5967PPI
think5968VVPthink
,5969,,
appropriately5970RBappropriately
deemed5971VVNdeem
to5972TOto
be5973VBbe
an5974DTan
additional5975JJadditional
payment5976NNpayment
that5977WDTthat
is5978VBZbe
for5979INfor
services5980NNSservice
rendered5981VVNrender
,5982,,
in5983INin
the5984DTthe
same5985JJsame
way5986NNway
that5987IN/thatthat
sick5988JJsick
pay5989NNpay
accumulates5990VVZaccumulate
over5991INover
time5992NNtime
in5993INin
...5994:...
in5995INin
the5996DTthe
appropriate5997JJappropriate
circumstances5998NNScircumstance
.5999SENT.
It6000PPit
did6001VVDdo
n't6002RBn't
for6003INfor
Mr6004NPMr
.6005SENT.
Loos6006NPLoos
.6007SENT.
But6008CCbut
,6009,,
for6010INfor
vacation6011NNvacation
pay6012NNpay
,6013,,
if6014INif
you6015PPyou
're6016VBPbe
a6017DTa
federal6018JJfederal
employee6019NNemployee
and6020CCand
you6021PPyou
have6022VHPhave
a6023DTa
40-hour6024JJ40-hour
pay6025NNpay
stub6026NNstub
and6027CCand
it6028PPit
shows6029VVZshow
a6030DTa
certain6031JJcertain
number6032NNnumber
of6033INof
hours6034NNShour
that6035IN/thatthat
you6036PPyou
've6037VHPhave
accrued6038VVNaccrue
for6039INfor
vacation6040NNvacation
pay6041NNpay
,6042,,
those6043DTthose
are6044VBPbe
all6045RBall
for6046INfor
the6047DTthe
services6048NNSservice
that6049IN/thatthat
you6050PPyou
rendered6051VVDrender
as6052INas
an6053DTan
employee6054NNemployee
.6055SENT.
Now6056RBnow
,6057,,
with6058INwith
respect6059NNrespect
to6060TOto
worker6061NNworker
's6062POS's
compensation6063NNcompensation
,6064,,
because6065INbecause
it6066PPit
's6067VBZbe
an6068DTan
insurance6069NNinsurance
scheme6070NNscheme
that6071WDTthat
is6072VBZbe
no6073DTno
fault6074NNfault
,6075,,
it6076PPit
operates6077VVZoperate
in6078INin
a6079DTa
very6080RBvery
different6081JJdifferent
way6082NNway
in6083INin
terms6084NNSterm
of6085INof
how6086WRBhow
it6087PPit
is6088VBZbe
funded6089VVNfund
.6090SENT.
There6091EXthere
's6092VBZbe
no6093RBno
pre-funding6094VVGpre-fund
on6095INon
the6096DTthe
part6097NNpart
of6098INof
the6099DTthe
railroad6100NNrailroad
for6101INfor
FELA6102NPFela
damages6103NNSdamage
.6104SENT.
The6105DTthe
whole6106JJwhole
point6107NNpoint
of6108INof
the6109DTthe
FELA6110NPFela
is6111VBZbe
to6112TOto
impose6113VVimpose
a6114DTa
duty6115NNduty
of6116INof
due6117JJdue
care6118NNcare
on6119INon
the6120DTthe
industry6121NNindustry
so6122INso
that6123DTthat
workers6124NNSworker
are6125VBPbe
not6126RBnot
being6127VBGbe
injured6128VVNinjure
as6129INas
a6130DTa
result6131NNresult
of6132INof
the6133DTthe
railroad6134NNrailroad
's6135POS's
negligence6136NNnegligence
.6137SENT.
And6138CCand
that6139DTthat
's6140VBZbe
why6141WRBwhy
Justice6142NPJustice
Brandeis6143NPBrandeis
in6144INin
the6145DTthe
Winfield6146NPWinfield
case6147NNcase
in6148INin
the6149DTthe
early6150JJearly
1920s6151NNS1920s
made6152VVDmake
very6153RBvery
clear6154VVclear
that6155IN/thatthat
an6156DTan
FELA6157NPFela
judgment6158NNjudgment
is6159VBZbe
a6160DTa
penalty6161NNpenalty
for6162INfor
the6163DTthe
breach6164NNbreach
of6165INof
a6166DTa
duty6167NNduty
of6168INof
due6169JJdue
care6170NNcare
.6171SENT.
And6172CCand
Justice6173NPJustice
Scalia6174NPScalia
,6175,,
in6176INin
his6177PP$his
separate6178JJseparate
writing6179NNwriting
in6180INin
Cleveland6181NPCleveland
Indians6182NPSIndians
,6183,,
said6184VVDsay
,6185,,
in6186INin
his6187PP$his
view6188NNview
,6189,,
the6190DTthe
question6191NNquestion
is6192VBZbe
different6193JJdifferent
as6194RBas
to6195TOto
whether6196INwhether
or6197CCor
not6198RBnot
it6199PPit
is6200VBZbe
a6201DTa
court-ordered6202JJcourt-ordered
judgment6203NNjudgment
that6204WDTthat
is6205VBZbe
not6206RBnot
the6207DTthe
way6208NNway
you6209PPyou
ordinarily6210RBordinarily
think6211VVPthink
of6212INof
wages6213NNSwage
paid6214VVNpay
,6215,,
which6216WDTwhich
is6217VBZbe
the6218DTthe
way6219NNway
that6220IN/thatthat
the6221DTthe
phrase6222NNphrase
is6223VBZbe
used6224VVNuse
under6225INunder
FICA6226NPFICA
.6227SENT.
So6228RBso
,6229,,
if6230INif
you6231PPyou
look6232VVPlook
at6233INat
these6234DTthese
textual6235JJtextual
differences6236NNSdifference
,6237,,
the6238DTthe
line-drawing6239VVGline-draw
,6240,,
I6241PPI
think6242VVPthink
,6243,,
Justice6244NPJustice
Gorsuch6245NPGorsuch
,6246,,
is6247VBZbe
actually6248RBactually
pretty6249RBpretty
straightforward6250JJstraightforward
.6251SENT.
You6252PPyou
ask6253VVPask
the6254DTthe
question6255NNquestion
:6256::
Is6257VBZbe
the6258DTthe
work6259NNwork
and6260CCand
the6261DTthe
pay6262NNpay
here6263RBhere
,6264,,
the6265DTthe
compensation6266NNcompensation
,6267,,
for6268INfor
services6269NNSservice
rendered6270VVNrender
?6271SENT?
And6272CCand
if6273INif
it6274PPit
's6275VBZbe
not6276RBnot
,6277,,
which6278WDTwhich
,6279,,
clearly6280RBclearly
,6281,,
it6282PPit
could6283MDcould
n't6284RBn't
be6285VBbe
here6286RBhere
because6287INbecause
Mr6288NPMr
.6289SENT.
Loos6290NNSloo
was6291VBDbe
unable6292JJunable
to6293TOto
render6294VVrender
services6295NNSservice
,6296,,
then6297RBthen
it6298PPit
is6299VBZbe
outside6300INoutside
the6301DTthe
realm6302NNrealm
of6303INof
the6304DTthe
RRTA6305NPRRTA
.6306SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]6307LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Well6308UHwell
,6309,,
you6310PPyou
put6311VVDput
an6312DTan
awful6313JJawful
lot6314NNlot
of6315INof
weight6316NNweight
on6317INon
that6318DTthat
,6319,,
but6320CCbut
I6321PPI
can6322MDcan
easily6323RBeasily
imagine6324VVimagine
an6325DTan
employer6326NNemployer
explaining6327VVGexplain
how6328WRBhow
we6329PPwe
work6330VVPwork
in6331INin
this6332DTthis
company6333NNcompany
.6334SENT.
We6335PPwe
work6336VVPwork
in6337INin
this6338DTthis
company6339NNcompany
is6340VBZbe
that6341IN/thatthat
we6342PPwe
pay6343VVPpay
you6344PPyou
for6345INfor
services6346NNSservice
rendered6347VVNrender
.6348SENT.
By6349INby
the6350DTthe
way6351NNway
,6352,,
services6353NNSservice
rendered6354VVNrender
includes6355VVZinclude
Christmas6356NPChristmas
Day6357NPDay
,6358,,
though6359INthough
you6360PPyou
're6361VBPbe
not6362RBnot
here6363RBhere
.6364SENT.
By6365INby
the6366DTthe
way6367NNway
,6368,,
it6369PPit
includes6370VVZinclude
when6371WRBwhen
you6372PPyou
have6373VHPhave
a6374DTa
cold6375JJcold
or6376CCor
sick6377JJsick
for6378INfor
a6379DTa
few6380JJfew
days6381NNSday
.6382SENT.
That6383WDTthat
we6384PPwe
...6385:...
that6386IN/thatthat
we6387PPwe
count6388VVPcount
all6389RBall
that6390IN/thatthat
as6391INas
payment6392NNpayment
for6393INfor
services6394NNSservice
rendered6395VVNrender
.6396SENT.
That6397DTthat
person6398NNperson
is6399VBZbe
speaking6400VVGspeak
English6401JJEnglish
.6402SENT.
So6403INso
their6404PP$their
first6405JJfirst
argument6406NNargument
is6407VBZbe
,6408,,
at6409INat
the6410DTthe
least6411JJSleast
,6412,,
it6413PPit
's6414VBZbe
ambiguous6415JJambiguous
.6416SENT.
Their6417PP$their
second6418JJsecond
argument6419NNargument
is6420VBZbe
go6421VVgo
and6422CCand
look6423VVlook
at6424INat
all6425PDTall
these6426DTthese
changes6427NNSchange
that6428WDTthat
happened6429VVDhappen
in6430INin
the6431DTthe
statute6432NNstatute
over6433INover
those6434DTthose
years6435NNSyear
.6436SENT.
You6437PPyou
know6438VVPknow
what6439WPwhat
they6440PPthey
were6441VBDbe
arguing6442VVGargue
about6443RBabout
?6444SENT?
They6445PPthey
were6446VBDbe
arguing6447VVGargue
about6448RBabout
whether6449INwhether
you6450PPyou
tax6451VVPtax
it6452PPit
at6453INat
the6454DTthe
time6455NNtime
you6456PPyou
would6457MDwould
have6458VHhave
worked6459VVNwork
or6460CCor
you6461PPyou
tax6462VVPtax
it6463PPit
when6464WRBwhen
you6465PPyou
get6466VVPget
it6467PPit
after6468INafter
the6469DTthe
judgment6470NNjudgment
now6471RBnow
.6472SENT.
They6473PPthey
never6474RBnever
thought6475VVDthink
you6476PPyou
did6477VVDdo
n't6478RBn't
get6479VVget
it6480PPit
at6481INat
all6482DTall
.6483SENT.
And6484CCand
their6485PP$their
argument6486NNargument
about6487INabout
the6488DTthe
two6489CDtwo
statutes6490NNSstatute
is6491VBZbe
it6492PPit
's6493VBZbe
a6494DTa
plus6495NNplus
.6496SENT.
We6497PPwe
're6498VBPbe
not6499RBnot
saying6500VVGsay
it6501PPit
's6502VBZbe
necessary6503JJnecessary
,6504,,
but6505CCbut
it6506PPit
's6507VBZbe
a6508DTa
plus6509NNplus
to6510TOto
treat6511VVtreat
the6512DTthe
taxing6513VVGtax
statute6514NNstatute
symmetrical6515JJsymmetrical
with6516INwith
.6517SENT.
And6518CCand
their6519PP$their
final6520JJfinal
argument6521NNargument
is6522VBZbe
that6523IN/thatthat
,6524,,
hey6525UHhey
,6526,,
806527CD@card@
years6528NNSyear
is6529VBZbe
a6530DTa
long6531JJlong
time6532NNtime
.6533SENT.
Justice6534NPJustice
Blackmun6535NPBlackmun
used6536VVDuse
to6537TOto
complain6538VVcomplain
about6539INabout
all6540PDTall
these6541DTthese
changes6542NNSchange
.6543SENT.
And6544CCand
,6545,,
indeed6546RBindeed
,6547,,
806548CD@card@
years6549NNSyear
,6550,,
Congress6551NPCongress
has6552VHZhave
done6553VVNdo
nothing6554NNnothing
,6555,,
okay6556JJokay
.6557SENT.
Now6558RBnow
you6559PPyou
've6560VHPhave
responded6561VVNrespond
to6562TOto
some6563DTsome
.6564SENT.
I6565PPI
just6566RBjust
want6567VVPwant
to6568TOto
be6569VBbe
sure6570RBsure
you6571PPyou
get6572VVPget
a6573DTa
chance6574NNchance
to6575TOto
respond6576VVrespond
to6577TOto
all6578DTall
.6579SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]6580LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Well6581UHWell
,6582,,
if6583INif
I6584PPI
do6585VVPdo
n't6586RBn't
get6587VVget
them6588PPthem
all6589RBall
in6590INin
this6591DTthis
response6592NNresponse
,6593,,
Justice6594NPJustice
Breyer6595NPBreyer
,6596,,
please6597RBplease
feel6598VVPfeel
free6599JJfree
to6600TOto
interrupt6601VVinterrupt
me6602PPme
.6603SENT.
But6604CCbut
,6605,,
on6606INon
the6607DTthe
history6608NNhistory
point6609NNpoint
,6610,,
the6611DTthe
other6612JJother
side6613NNside
,6614,,
notwithstanding6615INnotwithstanding
our6616PP$our
challenge6617NNchallenge
,6618,,
cannot6619MDcan
give6620VVgive
you6621PPyou
one6622CDone
instance6623NNinstance
,6624,,
not6625RBnot
one6626CDone
,6627,,
where6628WRBwhere
the6629DTthe
IRS6630NPIRS
issued6631VVDissue
a6632DTa
deficiency6633NNdeficiency
notice6634NNnotice
because6635INbecause
there6636EXthere
had6637VHDhave
been6638VBNbe
a6639DTa
failure6640NNfailure
to6641TOto
pay6642VVpay
RRTA6643NPRRTA
taxes6644NNStaxis
for6645INfor
an6646DTan
FELA6647NPFela
judgment6648NNjudgment
.6649SENT.
If6650INif
you6651PPyou
look6652VVPlook
at6653INat
the6654DTthe
Federal6655NPFederal
Judicial6656NPJudicial
Center6657NPCenter
's6658POS's
website6659NNwebsite
,6660,,
there6661EXthere
have6662VHPhave
been6663VBNbe
something6664NNsomething
like6665INlike
71,0006666CD@card@
FELA6667NPFela
suits6668NNSsuit
filed6669VVDfile
just6670RBjust
since6671INsince
19706672CD@card@
.6673SENT.
Now6674RBnow
,6675,,
surely6676RBsurely
,6677,,
if6678INif
this6679DTthis
had6680VHDhave
been6681VBNbe
the6682DTthe
way6683NNway
the6684DTthe
taxing6685VVGtax
service6686NNservice
had6687VHDhave
been6688VBNbe
construing6689VVGconstrue
this6690DTthis
statute6691NNstatute
,6692,,
there6693EXthere
would6694MDwould
be6695VBbe
at6696INat
least6697JJSleast
$6698$$
16699CD1
deposited6700VVNdeposit
from6701INfrom
the6702DTthe
Treasury6703NNtreasury
as6704INas
a6705DTa
result6706NNresult
of6707INof
an6708DTan
FELA6709NPFela
judgment6710NNjudgment
and6711CCand
a6712DTa
deficiency6713NNdeficiency
notice6714NNnotice
for6715INfor
a6716DTa
failure6717NNfailure
to6718TOto
do6719VVdo
that6720DTthat
.6721SENT.
This6722DTthis
is6723VBZbe
all6724PDTall
a6725DTa
new6726JJnew
argument6727NNargument
.6728SENT.
And6729CCand
the6730DTthe
reason6731NNreason
why6732WRBwhy
the6733DTthe
railroad6734NNrailroad
has6735VHZhave
come6736VVNcome
up6737RPup
with6738INwith
this6739DTthis
new6740JJnew
argument6741NNargument
is6742VBZbe
simply6743RBsimply
to6744TOto
change6745VVchange
the6746DTthe
settlement6747NNsettlement
dynamics6748NNSdynamics
that6749WDTthat
are6750VBPbe
going6751VVGgo
on6752INon
.6753SENT.
And6754CCand
by6755INby
changing6756VVGchange
those6757DTthose
settlement6758NNsettlement
dynamics6759NNSdynamics
,6760,,
they6761PPthey
are6762VBPbe
seeking6763VVGseek
to6764TOto
impose6765VVimpose
the6766DTthe
in6767INin
terrorem6768NNterrorem
threat6769NNthreat
of6770INof
a6771DTa
taxation6772NNtaxation
on6773INon
the6774DTthe
employee6775NNemployee
at6776INat
the6777DTthe
time6778NNtime
when6779WRBwhen
there6780EXthere
's6781VBZbe
a6782DTa
negotiation6783NNnegotiation
.6784SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6785LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I6786PPI
'm6787VBPbe
sorry6788JJsorry
.6789SENT.
Explain6790VVexplain
that6791IN/thatthat
to6792TOto
me6793PPme
.6794SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]6795LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Sure6796NPSure
.6797SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6798LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
What6799WDTwhat
...6800:...
what6801WPwhat
are6802VBPbe
they6803PPthey
going6804VVGgo
to6805TOto
do6806VVdo
?6807SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]6808LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
What6809WPWhat
they6810PPthey
...6811:...
when6812WRBwhen
there6813EXthere
's6814VBZbe
a6815DTa
settlement6816NNsettlement
negotiation6817NNnegotiation
,6818,,
Justice6819NPJustice
Sotomayor6820NPSotomayor
,6821,,
the6822DTthe
question6823NNquestion
is6824VBZbe
will6825MDwill
you6826PPyou
...6827:...
will6828MDwill
we6829PPwe
pay6830VVpay
you6831PPyou
now6832RBnow
for6833INfor
your6834PP$your
range6835NNrange
of6836INof
damages6837NNSdamage
or6838CCor
will6839MDwill
you6840PPyou
run6841VVrun
the6842DTthe
risk6843NNrisk
of6844INof
going6845VVGgo
to6846TOto
court6847NNcourt
.6848SENT.
And6849CCand
as6850INas
part6851NNpart
of6852INof
that6853DTthat
calculus6854NNcalculus
,6855,,
the6856DTthe
question6857NNquestion
is6858VBZbe
whether6859INwhether
or6860CCor
not6861RBnot
taxes6862NNStaxis
would6863MDwould
be6864VBbe
owed6865VVNowe
and6866CCand
owing6867VVGowe
on6868INon
that6869DTthat
.6870SENT.
And6871CCand
if6872INif
the6873DTthe
taxes6874NNStaxis
are6875VBPbe
not6876RBnot
owed6877VVNowe
and6878CCand
owing6879VVGowe
because6880INbecause
it6881PPit
is6882VBZbe
a6883DTa
judgment6884NNjudgment
,6885,,
then6886RBthen
that6887DTthat
is6888VBZbe
for6889INfor
the6890DTthe
workers6891NNSworker
'6892POS'
favor6893NNfavor
in6894INin
terms6895NNSterm
of6896INof
considering6897VVGconsider
whether6898INwhether
...6899:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6900LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I6901PPI
'm6902VBPbe
sorry6903JJsorry
...6904:...
[MR. FREDERICK]6905LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
...6906:...
or6907CCor
not6908RBnot
to6909TOto
settle6910VVsettle
the6911DTthe
case6912NNcase
.6913SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6914LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I6915PPI
'm6916VBPbe
sorry6917JJsorry
.6918SENT.
There6919EXthere
's6920VBZbe
a6921DTa
settlement6922NNsettlement
under6923INunder
a6924DTa
FELA6925NPFela
action6926NNaction
,6927,,
X6928NNX
amount6929NNamount
of6930INof
money6931NNmoney
.6932SENT.
It6933PPit
has6934VHZhave
to6935TOto
be6936VBbe
attributed6937VVNattribute
to6938TOto
something6939NNsomething
,6940,,
correct6941JJcorrect
?6942SENT?
Are6943VBPbe
you6944PPyou
saying6945VVGsay
...6946:...
[MR. FREDERICK]6947LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
No6948RBno
,6949,,
it6950PPit
does6951VVZdo
n't6952RBn't
,6953,,
actually6954RBactually
.6955SENT.
There6956RBthere
...6957:...
there6958RBthere
,6959,,
I6960PPI
do6961VVPdo
n't6962RBn't
understand6963VVunderstand
their6964PP$their
textual6965JJtextual
argument6966NNargument
for6967INfor
that6968DTthat
at6969INat
all6970DTall
because6971INbecause
what6972WPwhat
they6973PPthey
're6974VBPbe
asking6975VVGask
for6976INfor
you6977PPyou
to6978TOto
do6979VVdo
is6980VBZbe
to6981TOto
accept6982VVaccept
the6983DTthe
idea6984NNidea
that6985IN/thatthat
the6986DTthe
Railroad6987NPRailroad
Retirement6988NPRetirement
Board6989NPBoard
somehow6990RBsomehow
has6991VHZhave
the6992DTthe
administrative6993JJadministrative
authority6994NNauthority
to6995TOto
construe6996VVconstrue
a6997DTa
taxing6998VVGtax
statute6999NNstatute
.7000SENT.
And7001CCand
that7002DTthat
's7003VBZbe
never7004RBnever
been7005VBNbe
the7006DTthe
case7007NNcase
where7008WRBwhere
you7009PPyou
have7010VHPhave
a7011DTa
benefit7012NNbenefit
agency7013NNagency
construing7014VVGconstrue
the7015DTthe
taxing7016VVGtax
statute7017NNstatute
.7018SENT.
The7019DTthe
taxing7020VVGtax
statute7021NNstatute
is7022VBZbe
construed7023VVNconstrue
by7024INby
the7025DTthe
IRS7026NPIRS
.7027SENT.
Now7028RBnow
,7029,,
if7030INif
you7031PPyou
look7032VVPlook
at7033INat
the7034DTthe
sources7035NNSsource
in7036INin
our7037PP$our
Footnotes7038NNSfootnote
27039CD2
,7040,,
37041CD3
,7042,,
and7043CCand
47044CD4
in7045INin
our7046PP$our
brief7047NNbrief
,7048,,
they7049PPthey
make7050VVPmake
very7051RBvery
clear7052VVclear
that7053IN/thatthat
the7054DTthe
IRS7055NPIRS
in7056INin
...7057:...
in7058INin
...7059:...
in7060INin
interpretations7061NNSinterpretation
that7062WDTthat
post-date7063NNpost-date
the7064DTthe
sources7065NNSsource
that7066IN/thatthat
they7067PPthey
're7068VBPbe
talking7069VVGtalk
about7070RBabout
here7071RBhere
say7072VVPsay
that7073IN/thatthat
when7074WRBwhen
there7075EXthere
's7076VBZbe
a7077DTa
personal7078JJpersonal
injury7079NNinjury
award7080NNaward
,7081,,
it7082PPit
is7083VBZbe
not7084RBnot
subject7085JJsubject
to7086TOto
income7087NNincome
tax7088NNtax
.7089SENT.
And7090CCand
in7091INin
the7092DTthe
first7093JJfirst
one7094CDone
,7095,,
the7096DTthe
citation7097NNcitation
that7098WDTthat
is7099VBZbe
on7100INon
Footnote7101NNfootnote
27102CD2
of7103INof
our7104PP$our
brief7105NNbrief
,7106,,
the7107DTthe
IRS7108NPIRS
specifically7109RBspecifically
mentions7110VVZmention
that7111IN/thatthat
this7112DTthis
would7113MDwould
apply7114VVapply
in7115INin
the7116DTthe
Railroad7117NPRailroad
Retirement7118NPRetirement
Tax7119NPTax
Act7120NPAct
concept7121NNconcept
...7122:...
context7123NNcontext
as7124INas
well7125RBwell
.7126SENT.
That7127RBthat
,7128,,
I7129PPI
think7130VVPthink
,7131,,
is7132VBZbe
on7133INon
page7134NNpage
137135CD@card@
or7136CCor
147137CD@card@
of7138INof
that7139DTthat
particular7140JJparticular
reference7141NNreference
.7142SENT.
They7143PPthey
hang7144VVPhang
their7145PP$their
hat7146NNhat
on7147INon
this7148DTthis
19807149CD@card@
advisory7150JJadvisory
opinion7151NNopinion
...7152:...
memo7153NNmemo
,7154,,
but7155CCbut
I7156PPI
'd7157MDwould
like7158VVlike
...7159:...
the7160DTthe
...7161:...
the7162DTthe
so-called7163JJso-called
TAM7164NNtam
,7165,,
but7166CCbut
I7167PPI
'd7168MDwould
like7169VVlike
to7170TOto
point7171VVpoint
out7172RPout
that7173IN/thatthat
the7174DTthe
...7175:...
under7176INunder
the7177DTthe
code7178NNcode
,7179,,
Section7180NPSection
61107181CD@card@
(7182((
k7183NNk
)7184))
(7185((
37186LS3
)7187))
of7188INof
Title7189NPTitle
267190CD@card@
,7191,,
Congress7192NPCongress
has7193VHZhave
said7194VVNsay
,7195,,
unless7196INunless
the7197DTthe
Secretary7198NPSecretary
otherwise7199RBotherwise
establishes7200VVZestablish
by7201INby
regulations7202NNSregulation
,7203,,
a7204DTa
written7205JJwritten
determination7206NNdetermination
may7207MDmay
not7208RBnot
be7209VBbe
used7210VVNuse
or7211CCor
cited7212VVNcite
as7213INas
precedent7214NNprecedent
,7215,,
which7216WDTwhich
is7217VBZbe
probably7218RBprobably
why7219WRBwhy
that7220DTthat
Technical7221NPTechnical
Advice7222NPAdvice
Memorandum7223NPMemorandum
is7224VBZbe
n't7225RBn't
cited7226VVNcite
in7227INin
the7228DTthe
Solicitor7229NPSolicitor
General7230NPGeneral
's7231POS's
brief7232NNbrief
,7233,,
although7234INalthough
counsel7235NNcounsel
today7236NNtoday
has7237VHZhave
invoked7238VVNinvoke
that7239IN/thatthat
as7240INas
supposed7241VVNsuppose
authority7242NNauthority
.7243SENT.
But7244CCbut
I7245PPI
would7246MDwould
point7247VVpoint
out7248RPout
,7249,,
secondly7250RBsecondly
,7251,,
that7252IN/thatthat
this7253DTthis
TAM7254NNtam
,7255,,
this7256DTthis
19807257CD@card@
reference7258NNreference
,7259,,
concerns7260VVZconcern
a7261DTa
version7262NNversion
of7263INof
the7264DTthe
statute7265NNstatute
that7266IN/thatthat
no7267DTno
longer7268RBRlonger
exists7269VVZexist
.7270SENT.
It7271PPit
was7272VBDbe
part7273NNpart
of7274INof
the7275DTthe
statute7276NNstatute
...7277:...
it7278PPit
was7279VBDbe
construing7280VVGconstrue
a7281DTa
statute7282NNstatute
that7283WDTthat
was7284VBDbe
in7285INin
effect7286NNeffect
up7287RPup
until7288INuntil
19757289CD@card@
.7290SENT.
And7291CCand
,7292,,
Justice7293NPJustice
Kavanaugh7294NPKavanaugh
,7295,,
you7296PPyou
're7297VBPbe
correct7298JJcorrect
,7299,,
at7300INat
that7301DTthat
time7302NNtime
,7303,,
that7304WDTthat
's7305VBZbe
when7306WRBwhen
the7307DTthe
time7308NNtime
lost7309VVDlose
language7310NNlanguage
was7311VBDbe
taken7312VVNtake
out7313RPout
of7314INof
the7315DTthe
statute7316NNstatute
.7317SENT.
That7318DTthat
19807319CD@card@
TAM7320NNtam
was7321VBDbe
construing7322VVGconstrue
the7323DTthe
previous7324JJprevious
version7325NNversion
of7326INof
the7327DTthe
statute7328NNstatute
that7329WDTthat
does7330VVZdo
n't7331RBn't
exist7332VVexist
anymore7333RBanymore
.7334SENT.
So7335RBso
,7336,,
for7337INfor
purposes7338NNSpurpose
of7339INof
understanding7340VVGunderstand
where7341WRBwhere
there7342EXthere
has7343VHZhave
been7344VBNbe
consistency7345NNconsistency
or7346CCor
inconsistency7347NNinconsistency
,7348,,
there7349EXthere
's7350VHZhave
been7351VBNbe
rank7352JJrank
inconsistency7353NNinconsistency
because7354INbecause
the7355DTthe
IRS7356NPIRS
has7357VHZhave
...7358:...
has7359VHZhave
said7360VVNsay
different7361JJdifferent
things7362NNSthing
in7363INin
different7364JJdifferent
means7365NNSmean
that7366WDTthat
are7367VBPbe
entitled7368VVNentitle
to7369TOto
different7370JJdifferent
levels7371NNSlevel
of7372INof
respect7373NNrespect
.7374SENT.
And7375CCand
so7376RBso
...7377:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]7378LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Why7379WRBwhy
...7380:...
why7381WRBwhy
do7382VVPdo
you7383PPyou
think7384VVPthink
the7385DTthe
language7386NNlanguage
was7387VBDbe
taken7388VVNtake
out7389RPout
?7390SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]7391LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
I7392PPI
think7393VVPthink
it7394PPit
...7395:...
there7396RBthere
...7397:...
it7398PPit
's7399VBZbe
actually7400RBactually
a7401DTa
good7402JJgood
question7403NNquestion
,7404,,
Justice7405NPJustice
Ginsburg7406NPGinsburg
.7407SENT.
The7408DTthe
intimation7409NNintimation
in7410INin
the7411DTthe
railroad7412NNrailroad
's7413POS's
brief7414NNbrief
here7415RBhere
is7416VBZbe
that7417IN/thatthat
the7418DTthe
railroad7419NNrailroad
thought7420VVDthink
it7421PPit
would7422MDwould
be7423VBbe
easier7424JJReasy
to7425TOto
administer7426VVadminister
without7427INwithout
having7428VHGhave
that7429DTthat
language7430NNlanguage
.7431SENT.
But7432CCbut
there7433EXthere
is7434VBZbe
no7435DTno
...7436:...
there7437EXthere
are7438VBPbe
no7439DTno
statements7440NNSstatement
of7441INof
or7442CCor
legislative7443JJlegislative
history7444NNhistory
that7445WDTthat
would7446MDwould
suggest7447VVsuggest
exactly7448RBexactly
why7449WRBwhy
.7450SENT.
One7451CDOne
theory7452NNtheory
could7453MDcould
be7454VBbe
that7455IN/thatthat
the7456DTthe
reason7457NNreason
why7458WRBwhy
the7459DTthe
time7460NNtime
lost7461VVNlose
language7462NNlanguage
had7463VHDhave
been7464VBNbe
added7465VVNadd
was7466VBDbe
to7467TOto
implement7468VVimplement
what7469WPwhat
was7470VBDbe
called7471VVNcall
the7472DTthe
Washington7473NPWashington
agreement7474NNagreement
in7475INin
the7476DTthe
late7477JJlate
'7478POS'
30s7479NNS30s
.7480SENT.
And7481CCand
the7482DTthe
Washington7483NPWashington
agreement7484NNagreement
was7485VBDbe
a7486DTa
deal7487NNdeal
struck7488VVDstrike
between7489INbetween
rail7490NNrail
labor7491NNlabor
and7492CCand
the7493DTthe
railroads7494NNSrailroad
with7495INwith
the7496DTthe
idea7497NNidea
of7498INof
treating7499VVGtreat
what7500WPwhat
was7501VBDbe
going7502VVGgo
on7503INon
at7504INat
the7505DTthe
time7506NNtime
in7507INin
the7508DTthe
industry7509NNindustry
of7510INof
a7511DTa
lot7512NNlot
of7513INof
unsettle7514VVunsettle
...7515:...
unsettlement7516NNunsettlement
,7517,,
where7518WRBwhere
workers7519NNSworker
who7520WPwho
had7521VHDhave
been7522VBNbe
working7523VVGwork
for7524INfor
one7525CDone
railroad7526NNrailroad
were7527VBDbe
part7528NNpart
of7529INof
...7530:...
got7531VVDget
caught7532VVNcatch
up7533RPup
in7534INin
the7535DTthe
mergers7536NNSmerger
.7537SENT.
They7538PPthey
lost7539VVDlose
the7540DTthe
ability7541NNability
to7542TOto
maintain7543VVmaintain
higher-paying7544JJhigher-paying
jobs7545NNSjob
.7546SENT.
And7547CCand
the7548DTthe
Washington7549NPWashington
agreement7550NNagreement
was7551VBDbe
to7552TOto
deal7553VVdeal
with7554INwith
what7555WPwhat
were7556VBDbe
called7557VVNcall
displacement7558NNdisplacement
allowances7559NNSallowance
.7560SENT.
These7561DTthese
displacement7562NNdisplacement
allowances7563NNSallowance
were7564VBDbe
defined7565VVNdefine
to7566TOto
be7567VBbe
time7568NNtime
lost7569VVNlose
in7570INin
that7571DTthat
era7572NNera
.7573SENT.
And7574CCand
it7575PPit
could7576MDcould
very7577RBvery
well7578RBwell
have7579VHPhave
been7580VBNbe
that7581IN/thatthat
,7582,,
by7583INby
the7584DTthe
1970s7585NNS1970s
,7586,,
this7587DTthis
whole7588JJwhole
reason7589NNreason
for7590INfor
that7591DTthat
concept7592NNconcept
had7593VHDhave
...7594:...
was7595VBDbe
no7596RBno
longer7597RBRlonger
in7598INin
effect7599NNeffect
.7600SENT.
Now7601RBnow
the7602DTthe
issue7603NNissue
in7604INin
that7605DTthat
19807606CD@card@
technical7607JJtechnical
advice7608NNadvice
memorandum7609NNmemorandum
...7610:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7611LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well7612UHwell
,7613,,
it7614PPit
's7615VBZbe
because7616INbecause
the7617DTthe
time7618NNtime
allocation7619NNallocation
was7620VBDbe
changed7621VVNchange
.7622SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]7623LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Well7624UHwell
,7625,,
you7626PPyou
're7627VBPbe
talking7628VVGtalk
about7629RBabout
...7630:...
you7631PPyou
're7632VBPbe
...7633:...
I7634PPI
think7635VVPthink
you7636PPyou
're7637VBPbe
making7638VVGmake
reference7639NNreference
,7640,,
Your7641PP$your
Honor7642NPHonor
,7643,,
to7644TOto
the7645DTthe
paid7646VVNpay
versus7647CCversus
earned7648VVNearn
...7649:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7650LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Yes7651NPYes
.7652SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]7653LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
...7654:...
distinction7655NNdistinction
?7656SENT?
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7657LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Yes7658NPYes
.7659SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]7660LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
But7661CCbut
that7662DTthat
...7663:...
whether7664INwhether
the7665DTthe
timing7666NNtiming
thing7667NNthing
had7668VHDhave
happened7669VVNhappen
as7670INas
a7671DTa
change7672NNchange
did7673VVDdo
n't7674RBn't
affect7675VVaffect
what7676WPwhat
was7677VBDbe
being7678VBGbe
taxed7679VVNtax
,7680,,
which7681WDTwhich
was7682VBDbe
services7683NNSservice
rendered7684VVDrender
.7685SENT.
So7686RBso
whether7687INwhether
you7688PPyou
tax7689NNtax
...7690:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7691LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I7692PPI
understand7693VVPunderstand
that7694RBthat
.7695SENT.
But7696CCbut
it7697PPit
changed7698VVDchange
...7699:...
you7700PPyou
did7701VVDdo
n't7702RBn't
need7703VVneed
the7704DTthe
language7705NNlanguage
anymore7706RBanymore
,7707,,
is7708VBZbe
...7709:...
is7710VBZbe
the7711DTthe
argument7712NNargument
,7713,,
right7714RBright
?7715SENT?
The7716DTthe
"7717``"
time7718NNtime
lost7719VVNlose
"7720``"
language7721NNlanguage
anymore7722RBanymore
...7723:...
because7724INbecause
the7725DTthe
...7726:...
the7727DTthe
allocation7728NNallocation
had7729VHDhave
changed7730VVNchange
?7731SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]7732LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Well7733UHWell
...7734:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7735LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
At7736INat
least7737JJSleast
that7738DTthat
's7739VBZbe
the7740DTthe
argument7741NNargument
.7742SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]7743LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
...7744:...
their7745PP$their
argument7746NNargument
goes7747VVZgo
beyond7748INbeyond
that7749DTthat
,7750,,
Justice7751NPJustice
Kavanaugh7752NPKavanaugh
,7753,,
and7754CCand
that7755DTthat
's7756VBZbe
when7757WRBwhen
they7758PPthey
are7759VBPbe
saying7760VVGsay
that7761IN/thatthat
the7762DTthe
words7763NNSword
"7764``"
including7765VVGinclude
time7766NNtime
lost7767VVNlose
"7768``"
somehow7769RBsomehow
make7770VVmake
"7771``"
services7772NNSservice
rendered7773VVDrender
"7774``"
mean7775VVmean
not7776RBnot
services7777NNSservice
rendered7778VVNrender
because7779INbecause
time7780NNtime
lost7781VVNlose
is7782VBZbe
somehow7783RBsomehow
an7784DTan
example7785NNexample
or7786CCor
an7787DTan
illustration7788NNillustration
of7789INof
the7790DTthe
concept7791NNconcept
of7792INof
services7793NNSservice
rendered7794VVNrender
.7795SENT.
As7796INas
a7797DTa
matter7798NNmatter
of7799INof
plain7800JJplain
English7801NPEnglish
,7802,,
that7803WDTthat
makes7804VVZmake
absolutely7805RBabsolutely
no7806DTno
sense7807NNsense
.7808SENT.
And7809CCand
we7810PPwe
've7811VHPhave
given7812VVNgive
a7813DTa
bunch7814NNbunch
of7815INof
statutory7816JJstatutory
examples7817NNSexample
in7818INin
our7819PP$our
brief7820NNbrief
of7821INof
where7822WRBwhere
Congress7823NPCongress
would7824MDwould
use7825VVuse
the7826DTthe
word7827NNword
"7828``"
including7829VVGinclude
"7830''"
to7831TOto
be7832VBbe
additive7833JJadditive
,7834,,
like7835INlike
in7836INin
the7837DTthe
Longshore7838NPLongshore
Act7839NPAct
,7840,,
where7841WRBwhere
the7842DTthe
situs7843NNsitus
requirement7844NNrequirement
is7845VBZbe
imposed7846VVNimpose
on7847INon
the7848DTthe
navigable7849JJnavigable
waters7850NNSwater
,7851,,
including7852VVGinclude
piers7853NNSpier
.7854SENT.
Now7855RBnow
I7856PPI
do7857VVPdo
n't7858RBn't
think7859VVthink
anybody7860NNanybody
in7861INin
this7862DTthis
room7863NNroom
today7864NNtoday
would7865MDwould
think7866VVthink
that7867IN/thatthat
a7868DTa
pier7869NNpier
is7870VBZbe
a7871DTa
navigable7872JJnavigable
water7873NNwater
,7874,,
but7875CCbut
yet7876RByet
that7877DTthat
's7878VBZbe
how7879WRBhow
Congress7880NPCongress
chose7881VVDchoose
to7882TOto
express7883VVexpress
itself7884PPitself
.7885SENT.
And7886CCand
it7887PPit
...7888:...
and7889CCand
I7890PPI
would7891MDwould
submit7892VVsubmit
that7893IN/thatthat
the7894DTthe
idea7895NNidea
of7896INof
time7897NNtime
lost7898VVNlose
under7899INunder
no7900DTno
reasonable7901JJreasonable
understanding7902NNunderstanding
of7903INof
the7904DTthe
English7905JJEnglish
language7906NNlanguage
would7907MDwould
be7908VBbe
services7909NNSservice
rendered7910VVNrender
either7911RBeither
.7912SENT.
So7913RBso
what7914WPwhat
you7915PPyou
're7916VBPbe
left7917VVNleave
with7918INwith
here7919RBhere
is7920VBZbe
what7921WPwhat
the7922DTthe
Eighth7923JJeighth
Circuit7924NNcircuit
deemed7925VVNdeem
to7926TOto
be7927VBbe
a7928DTa
very7929RBvery
clear7930JJclear
statute7931NNstatute
where7932WRBwhere
the7933DTthe
taxation7934NNtaxation
that7935WDTthat
was7936VBDbe
sought7937VVNseek
to7938TOto
be7939VBbe
imposed7940VVNimpose
here7941RBhere
was7942VBDbe
on7943INon
a7944DTa
...7945:...
an7946DTan
FELA7947NPFela
judgment7948NNjudgment
rather7949RBrather
than7950INthan
on7951INon
what7952WPwhat
services7953NNSservice
were7954VBDbe
rendered7955VVNrender
.7956SENT.
And7957CCand
one7958CDone
other7959JJother
note7960NNnote
about7961INabout
the7962DTthe
Eighth7963JJeighth
Circuit7964NNcircuit
panel7965NNpanel
.7966SENT.
This7967DTthis
Court7968NPCourt
,7969,,
in7970INin
Wisconsin7971NPWisconsin
Central7972NPCentral
just7973RBjust
last7974JJlast
term7975NNterm
,7976,,
construed7977VVDconstrue
the7978DTthe
earlier7979JJRearly
part7980NNpart
of7981INof
that7982DTthat
provision7983NNprovision
,7984,,
the7985DTthe
money7986NNmoney
remuneration7987NNremuneration
.7988SENT.
The7989DTthe
Eighth7990JJeighth
Circuit7991NNcircuit
panel7992NNpanel
that7993WDTthat
decided7994VVDdecide
this7995DTthis
case7996NNcase
also7997RBalso
had7998VHDhave
decided7999VVNdecide
a8000DTa
case8001NNcase
called8002VVDcall
Union8003NPUnion
Pacific8004NPPacific
,8005,,
which8006WDTwhich
handled8007VVDhandle
the8008DTthe
exact8009JJexact
question8010NNquestion
at8011INat
issue8012NNissue
in8013INin
Wisconsin8014NPWisconsin
Central8015NPCentral
,8016,,
and8017CCand
decided8018VVDdecide
it8019PPit
correctly8020RBcorrectly
,8021,,
as8022INas
this8023DTthis
Court8024NPCourt
opined8025VVDopine
.8026SENT.
It8027PPit
was8028VBDbe
the8029DTthe
same8030JJsame
panel8031NNpanel
that8032WDTthat
handled8033VVDhandle
both8034DTboth
issues8035NNSissue
.8036SENT.
And8037CCand
this8038DTthis
Court8039NPCourt
cited8040VVDcite
with8041INwith
approval8042NNapproval
the8043DTthe
Union8044NPUnion
Pacific8045NPPacific
decision8046NNdecision
.8047SENT.
Now8048RBnow
we8049PPwe
...8050:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8051LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I8052PPI
thought8053VVDthink
a8054DTa
key8055JJkey
move8056NNmove
in8057INin
the8058DTthe
Eighth8059JJeighth
Circuit8060NPCircuit
decision8061NNdecision
was8062VBDbe
interpreting8063VVGinterpret
Nierotko8064NPNierotko
,8065,,
and8066CCand
then8067RBthen
it8068PPit
said8069VVDsay
we8070PPwe
recently8071RBrecently
determined8072VVDdetermine
that8073IN/thatthat
that8074DTthat
definition8075NNdefinition
can8076MDcan
't8077RB't
be8078VBbe
imported8079VVNimport
into8080INinto
the8081DTthe
RRTA8082NPRRTA
because8083INbecause
the8084DTthe
FICA8085NPFICA
tax8086NNtax
is8087VBZbe
payment8088NNpayment
for8089INfor
employment8090NNemployment
,8091,,
which8092WDTwhich
is8093VBZbe
defined8094VVNdefine
broadly8095RBbroadly
.8096SENT.
But8097CCbut
,8098,,
in8099INin
fact8100NNfact
,8101,,
Nierotko8102NPNierotko
does8103VVZdo
go8104VVgo
to8105TOto
services8106NNSservice
performed8107VVNperform
,8108,,
which8109WDTwhich
is8110VBZbe
equivalent8111JJequivalent
,8112,,
the8113DTthe
argument8114NNargument
is8115VBZbe
,8116,,
to8117TOto
services8118NNSservice
rendered8119VVNrender
.8120SENT.
So8121RBso
how8122WRBhow
do8123VVPdo
you8124PPyou
respond8125VVrespond
to8126TOto
that8127DTthat
part8128NNpart
when8129WRBwhen
you8130PPyou
rely8131VVPrely
on8132INon
the8133DTthe
Eighth8134JJeighth
Circuit8135NNcircuit
so8136RBso
specifically8137RBspecifically
?8138SENT?
That8139DTthat
sentence8140NNsentence
jumps8141VVZjump
out8142RPout
at8143INat
me8144PPme
.8145SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]8146LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Well8147UHWell
,8148,,
again8149RBagain
,8150,,
it8151PPit
goes8152VVZgo
to8153TOto
the8154DTthe
difference8155NNdifference
between8156INbetween
benefits8157NNSbenefit
and8158CCand
taxes8159NNStaxis
and8160CCand
the8161DTthe
asymmetry8162NNasymmetry
there8163RBthere
.8164SENT.
If8165INif
you8166PPyou
were8167VBDbe
to8168TOto
take8169VVtake
...8170:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8171LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
That8172DTthat
's8173VBZbe
not8174RBnot
what8175WPwhat
they8176PPthey
were8177VBDbe
relying8178VVGrely
on8179INon
.8180SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]8181LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Well8182UHWell
,8183,,
no8184UHno
,8185,,
but8186CCbut
what8187WPwhat
they8188PPthey
were8189VBDbe
...8190:...
what8191WPwhat
...8192:...
I8193PPI
think8194VVPthink
that8195IN/thatthat
what8196WPwhat
...8197:...
they8198PPthey
were8199VBDbe
actually8200RBactually
relying8201VVGrely
on8202INon
the8203DTthe
fact8204NNfact
that8205IN/thatthat
there8206EXthere
is8207VBZbe
an8208DTan
asymmetry8209NNasymmetry
between8210INbetween
benefits8211NNSbenefit
and8212CCand
taxation8213NNtaxation
.8214SENT.
And8215CCand
if8216INif
you8217PPyou
take8218VVPtake
that8219DTthat
asymmetry8220NNasymmetry
...8221:...
let8222NNlet
's8223VBZbe
...8224:...
let8225VVlet
's8226VBZbe
just8227RBjust
play8228VVplay
this8229DTthis
out8230INout
a8231DTa
little8232JJlittle
bit8233NNbit
.8234SENT.
If8235INif
you8236PPyou
're8237VBPbe
a8238DTa
rail8239NNrail
worker8240NNworker
and8241CCand
you8242PPyou
work8243VVPwork
for8244INfor
four8245CDfour
years8246NNSyear
and8247CCand
118248CD@card@
months8249NNSmonth
,8250,,
you8251PPyou
paid8252VVDpay
your8253PP$your
RRTA8254NPRRTA
taxes8255NNStaxis
,8256,,
you8257PPyou
do8258VVPdo
not8259RBnot
qualify8260VVqualify
for8261INfor
benefits8262NNSbenefit
under8263INunder
the8264DTthe
Railroad8265NPRailroad
Retirement8266NPRetirement
Act8267NPAct
because8268INbecause
you8269PPyou
have8270VHPhave
n't8271RBn't
hit8272VVNhit
the8273DTthe
first8274JJfirst
five-year8275JJfive-year
threshold8276NNthreshold
.8277SENT.
So8278RBso
it8279PPit
is8280VBZbe
clear8281JJclear
from8282INfrom
that8283DTthat
example8284NNexample
that8285IN/thatthat
there8286EXthere
's8287VBZbe
an8288DTan
asymmetry8289NNasymmetry
between8290INbetween
the8291DTthe
taxing8292VVGtax
provision8293NNprovision
on8294INon
the8295DTthe
one8296CDone
hand8297NNhand
and8298CCand
the8299DTthe
benefits8300NNSbenefit
provision8301NNprovision
on8302INon
the8303DTthe
other8304JJother
hand8305NNhand
.8306SENT.
Justice8307NPJustice
Kagan8308NPKagan
,8309,,
you8310PPyou
mentioned8311VVDmention
the8312DTthe
idea8313NNidea
of8314INof
just8315RBjust
starting8316VVGstart
out8317RPout
.8318SENT.
Imagine8319VVimagine
the8320DTthe
system8321NNsystem
as8322INas
it8323PPit
was8324VBDbe
...8325:...
existed8326VVNexist
in8327INin
19378328CD@card@
,8329,,
where8330WRBwhere
you8331PPyou
had8332VHDhave
literally8333RBliterally
thousands8334NNSthousand
of8335INof
railmen8336NNSrailmen
who8337WPwho
were8338VBDbe
retiring8339VVGretire
or8340CCor
unable8341JJunable
to8342TOto
work8343VVwork
and8344CCand
they8345PPthey
were8346VBDbe
now8347RBnow
all8348RBall
of8349INof
a8350DTa
sudden8351JJsudden
getting8352VVGget
benefits8353NNSbenefit
,8354,,
but8355CCbut
there8356EXthere
were8357VBDbe
no8358DTno
tax8359NNtax
revenues8360NNSrevenue
at8361INat
that8362DTthat
time8363NNtime
that8364WDTthat
was8365VBDbe
sufficient8366JJsufficient
to8367TOto
pay8368VVpay
the8369DTthe
benefits8370NNSbenefit
.8371SENT.
So8372RBso
there8373EXthere
's8374VBZbe
always8375RBalways
been8376VBNbe
an8377DTan
asymmetry8378NNasymmetry
between8379INbetween
the8380DTthe
taxing8381VVGtax
provision8382NNprovision
and8383CCand
the8384DTthe
benefits8385NNSbenefit
provision8386NNprovision
.8387SENT.
And8388CCand
what8389WPwhat
they8390PPthey
're8391VBPbe
seeking8392VVGseek
to8393TOto
do8394VVdo
is8395VBZbe
to8396TOto
bootstrap8397NNbootstrap
the8398DTthe
words8399NNSword
that8400WDTthat
are8401VBPbe
in8402INin
the8403DTthe
benefits8404NNSbenefit
provision8405NNprovision
that8406IN/thatthat
no8407DTno
longer8408RBRlonger
exist8409VVexist
in8410INin
the8411DTthe
taxing8412VVGtax
provision8413NNprovision
and8414CCand
to8415TOto
give8416VVgive
those8417DTthose
words8418NNSword
meaning8419VVGmean
where8420WRBwhere
Congress8421NPCongress
intentionally8422RBintentionally
deleted8423VVDdelete
those8424DTthose
words8425NNSword
.8426SENT.
Now8427RBnow
,8428,,
if8429INif
I8430PPI
could8431MDcould
talk8432VVtalk
for8433INfor
a8434DTa
moment8435NNmoment
,8436,,
Justice8437NPJustice
Sotomayor8438NPSotomayor
,8439,,
about8440INabout
your8441PP$your
administrability8442NNadministrability
problem8443NNproblem
.8444SENT.
There8445EXthere
absolutely8446RBabsolutely
is8447VBZbe
a8448DTa
problem8449NNproblem
with8450INwith
a8451DTa
general8452JJgeneral
verdict8453NNverdict
because8454INbecause
,8455,,
in8456INin
many8457JJmany
states8458NNSstate
,8459,,
there8460EXthere
are8461VBPbe
general8462JJgeneral
verdict8463NNverdict
forms8464NNSform
and8465CCand
this8466DTthis
award8467NNaward
would8468MDwould
be8469VBbe
for8470INfor
all8471DTall
manner8472NNmanner
of8473INof
things8474NNSthing
.8475SENT.
But8476CCbut
the8477DTthe
administrability8478NNadministrability
problems8479NNSproblem
actually8480RBactually
go8481VVPgo
a8482DTa
little8483JJlittle
bit8484NNbit
further8485RBRfurther
than8486INthan
that8487DTthat
,8488,,
because8489RBbecause
,8490,,
in8491INin
the8492DTthe
case8493NNcase
of8494INof
Norfolk8495NPNorfolk
and8496CCand
Western8497NPWestern
versus8498CCversus
Liepelt8499NPLiepelt
,8500,,
which8501WDTwhich
we8502PPwe
cite8503VVPcite
in8504INin
our8505PP$our
brief8506NNbrief
but8507CCbut
the8508DTthe
other8509JJother
side8510NNside
does8511VVZdo
not8512RBnot
,8513,,
this8514DTthis
Court8515NPCourt
held8516VVDhold
that8517IN/thatthat
juries8518NNSjury
are8519VBPbe
required8520VVNrequire
to8521TOto
give8522VVgive
...8523:...
be8524VBbe
given8525VVNgive
instructions8526NNSinstruction
that8527IN/thatthat
the8528DTthe
awards8529NNSaward
that8530WDTthat
they8531PPthey
give8532VVPgive
under8533INunder
the8534DTthe
FELA8535NPFela
are8536VBPbe
not8537RBnot
subject8538JJsubject
to8539TOto
income8540NNincome
tax8541NNtax
.8542SENT.
Why8543WRBwhy
is8544VBZbe
that8545IN/thatthat
important8546JJimportant
?8547SENT?
The8548DTthe
railroad8549NNrailroad
asked8550VVDask
for8551INfor
that8552DTthat
instruction8553NNinstruction
in8554INin
the8555DTthe
Liepelt8556NPLiepelt
case8557NNcase
because8558INbecause
it8559PPit
did8560VVDdo
n't8561RBn't
want8562VVwant
juries8563NNSjury
inflating8564VVGinflate
awards8565NNSaward
because8566INbecause
the8567DTthe
jury8568NNjury
would8569MDwould
understand8570VVunderstand
that8571IN/thatthat
if8572INif
a8573DTa
...8574:...
a8575DTa
cache8576NNcache
of8577INof
money8578NNmoney
is8579VBZbe
being8580VBGbe
paid8581VVNpay
out8582RPout
to8583TOto
the8584DTthe
worker8585NNworker
,8586,,
it8587PPit
would8588MDwould
be8589VBbe
subject8590JJsubject
to8591TOto
tax8592NNtax
.8593SENT.
And8594CCand
that8595WDTthat
was8596VBDbe
leading8597VVGlead
the8598DTthe
railroad8599NNrailroad
to8600TOto
assert8601VVassert
that8602IN/thatthat
these8603DTthese
awards8604NNSaward
are8605VBPbe
being8606VBGbe
inflated8607VVNinflate
improperly8608RBimproperly
because8609INbecause
juries8610NNSjury
thought8611VVDthink
that8612IN/thatthat
these8613DTthese
were8614VBDbe
going8615VVGgo
to8616TOto
be8617VBbe
taxable8618JJtaxable
awards8619NNSaward
.8620SENT.
So8621INso
this8622DTthis
instruction8623NNinstruction
is8624VBZbe
given8625VVNgive
in8626INin
every8627DTevery
...8628:...
in8629INin
most8630JJSmost
every8631DTevery
FELA8632NPFela
case8633NNcase
that8634IN/thatthat
I8635PPI
'm8636VBPbe
aware8637JJaware
of8638INof
.8639SENT.
And8640CCand
it8641PPit
was8642VBDbe
given8643VVNgive
in8644INin
this8645DTthis
one8646CDone
.8647SENT.
It8648PPit
's8649VBZbe
in8650INin
the8651DTthe
Joint8652NPJoint
Appendix8653NPAppendix
at8654INat
page8655NNpage
918656CD@card@
.8657SENT.
That8658DTthat
instruction8659NNinstruction
given8660VVNgive
to8661TOto
the8662DTthe
jury8663NNjury
is8664VBZbe
that8665IN/thatthat
the8666DTthe
FELA8667NPFela
award8668NNaward
here8669RBhere
is8670VBZbe
not8671RBnot
going8672VVGgo
to8673TOto
be8674VBbe
subject8675JJsubject
to8676TOto
income8677NNincome
tax8678NNtax
.8679SENT.
So8680RBso
you8681PPyou
want8682VVPwant
to8683TOto
talk8684VVtalk
about8685INabout
administrability8686NNadministrability
problems8687NNSproblem
,8688,,
not8689RBnot
only8690RBonly
do8691VVPdo
you8692PPyou
have8693VHPhave
a8694DTa
problem8695NNproblem
with8696INwith
the8697DTthe
general8698JJgeneral
verdict8699NNverdict
,8700,,
but8701CCbut
you8702PPyou
have8703VHPhave
a8704DTa
problem8705NNproblem
with8706INwith
what8707WPwhat
would8708MDwould
be8709VBbe
colliding8710VVGcollide
opinions8711NNSopinion
of8712INof
this8713DTthis
Court8714NPCourt
if8715INif
you8716PPyou
were8717VBDbe
to8718TOto
accept8719VVaccept
what8720WPwhat
the8721DTthe
railroad8722NNrailroad
is8723VBZbe
arguing8724VVGargue
for8725INfor
here8726RBhere
.8727SENT.
On8728INon
the8729DTthe
one8730CDone
hand8731NNhand
,8732,,
the8733DTthe
jury8734NNjury
is8735VBZbe
told8736VVNtell
your8737PP$your
damages8738NNSdamage
verdict8739NNverdict
is8740VBZbe
not8741RBnot
going8742VVGgo
to8743TOto
be8744VBbe
subject8745JJsubject
to8746TOto
income8747NNincome
tax8748NNtax
,8749,,
but8750CCbut
if8751INif
you8752PPyou
award8753VVPaward
some8754DTsome
part8755NNpart
for8756INfor
past8757JJpast
earnings8758NNSearning
loss8759NNloss
,8760,,
that8761WDTthat
will8762MDwill
be8763VBbe
subject8764JJsubject
to8765TOto
the8766DTthe
RRTA8767NPRRTA
tax8768NNtax
.8769SENT.
So8770INso
the8771DTthe
jury8772NNjury
is8773VBZbe
somehow8774RBsomehow
supposed8775VVNsuppose
to8776TOto
figure8777VVfigure
out8778RPout
,8779,,
on8780INon
the8781DTthe
basis8782NNbasis
of8783INof
these8784DTthese
conflicting8785JJconflicting
instructions8786NNSinstruction
,8787,,
how8788WRBhow
much8789JJmuch
to8790TOto
inflate8791VVinflate
the8792DTthe
award8793NNaward
to8794TOto
cover8795VVcover
the8796DTthe
retirement8797NNretirement
tax8798NNtax
part8799NNpart
of8800INof
it8801PPit
.8802SENT.
But8803CCbut
,8804,,
wait8805VVPwait
,8806,,
it8807PPit
gets8808VVZget
more8809RBRmore
complicated8810JJcomplicated
than8811INthan
that8812IN/thatthat
because8813INbecause
there8814EXthere
are8815VBPbe
two8816CDtwo
different8817JJdifferent
tax8818NNtax
rates8819NNSrate
for8820INfor
the8821DTthe
railroad8822NNrailroad
retirement8823NNretirement
tax8824NNtax
.8825SENT.
There8826EXthere
's8827VBZbe
Tier8828NPTier
18829CD1
,8830,,
which8831WDTwhich
are8832VBPbe
more8833JJRmore
or8834CCor
less8835RBRless
equivalent8836JJequivalent
to8837TOto
the8838DTthe
kind8839NNkind
of8840INof
Social8841NPSocial
Security8842NPSecurity
taxes8843NNStaxis
that8844IN/thatthat
we8845PPwe
're8846VBPbe
familiar8847JJfamiliar
with8848INwith
under8849INunder
FICA8850NPFICA
.8851SENT.
But8852CCbut
there8853EXthere
's8854VBZbe
Tier8855NPTier
28856CD2
.8857SENT.
Tier8858NPTier
28859CD2
are8860VBPbe
more8861JJRmore
like8862INlike
private8863JJprivate
pensions8864NNSpension
,8865,,
and8866CCand
the8867DTthe
rate8868NNrate
of8869INof
tax8870NNtax
changes8871NNSchange
on8872INon
that8873WDTthat
every8874DTevery
year8875NNyear
based8876VVNbase
on8877INon
the8878DTthe
assets8879NNSasset
that8880WDTthat
have8881VHPhave
accumulated8882VVNaccumulate
under8883INunder
the8884DTthe
control8885NNcontrol
of8886INof
the8887DTthe
Railroad8888NPRailroad
Retirement8889NPRetirement
Board8890NPBoard
.8891SENT.
So8892RBso
not8893RBnot
only8894RBonly
are8895VBPbe
you8896PPyou
going8897VVGgo
to8898TOto
be8899VBbe
asking8900VVGask
juries8901NNSjury
to8902TOto
try8903VVtry
to8904TOto
figure8905VVfigure
out8906RPout
somehow8907RBsomehow
what8908WPwhat
tax8909NNtax
rate8910NNrate
to8911TOto
apply8912VVapply
to8913TOto
cover8914VVcover
this8915DTthis
little8916JJlittle
sliver8917NNsliver
of8918INof
lost8919VVNlose
wage8920NNwage
earnings8921NNSearning
,8922,,
but8923CCbut
you8924PPyou
're8925VBPbe
going8926VVGgo
to8927TOto
have8928VHhave
to8929TOto
impose8930VVimpose
on8931INon
courts8932NNScourt
the8933DTthe
duty8934NNduty
of8935INof
keeping8936VVGkeep
track8937NNtrack
every8938DTevery
year8939NNyear
,8940,,
as8941RBas
soon8942RBsoon
as8943INas
the8944DTthe
Railroad8945NPRailroad
Retirement8946NPRetirement
Board8947NPBoard
resets8948VVZreset
the8949DTthe
rate8950NNrate
for8951INfor
the8952DTthe
Tier8953NPTier
28954CD2
tax8955NNtax
because8956INbecause
...8957:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]8958LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
You8959PPyou
're8960VBPbe
speculating8961VVGspeculate
that8962IN/thatthat
juries8963NNSjury
are8964VBPbe
aware8965JJaware
of8966INof
railroad8967NNrailroad
retirement8968NNretirement
benefits8969NNSbenefit
and8970CCand
taxation8971NNtaxation
.8972SENT.
The8973DTthe
...8974:...
I8975PPI
think8976VVPthink
you8977PPyou
're8978VBPbe
quite8979RBquite
right8980JJright
when8981WRBwhen
you8982PPyou
say8983VVPsay
you8984PPyou
did8985VVDdo
n't8986RBn't
want8987VVwant
to8988TOto
inflate8989VVinflate
verdicts8990NNSverdict
to8991TOto
account8992VVaccount
for8993INfor
income8994NNincome
tax8995NNtax
.8996SENT.
But8997CCbut
what8998WPwhat
is8999VBZbe
the9000DTthe
likelihood9001NNlikelihood
that9002IN/thatthat
a9003DTa
jury9004NNjury
is9005VBZbe
going9006VVGgo
to9007TOto
think9008VVthink
of9009INof
railroad9010NNrailroad
retirement9011NNretirement
benefits9012NNSbenefit
?9013SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]9014LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
The9015DTthe
point9016NNpoint
,9017,,
Justice9018NPJustice
Ginsburg9019NPGinsburg
,9020,,
and9021CCand
...9022:...
and9023CCand
this9024DTthis
is9025VBZbe
where9026WRBwhere
I9027PPI
think9028VVPthink
looking9029VVGlook
again9030RBagain
at9031INat
this9032DTthis
Court9033NPCourt
's9034POS's
decision9035NNdecision
in9036INin
Norfolk9037NPNorfolk
and9038CCand
Western9039NPWestern
versus9040CCversus
Liepelt9041NPLiepelt
is9042VBZbe
instructive9043JJinstructive
,9044,,
because9045RBbecause
,9046,,
there9047EXthere
,9048,,
if9049INif
the9050DTthe
...9051:...
if9052INif
this9053DTthis
is9054VBZbe
fair9055JJfair
game9056NNgame
,9057,,
then9058RBthen
why9059WRBwhy
would9060MDwould
n't9061RBn't
it9062PPit
be9063VBbe
possible9064JJpossible
for9065INfor
the9066DTthe
worker9067NNworker
's9068POS's
lawyer9069NNlawyer
to9070TOto
say9071VVsay
,9072,,
now9073RBnow
this9074DTthis
...9075:...
one9076CDone
part9077NNpart
of9078INof
it9079PPit
's9080VBZbe
going9081VVGgo
to9082TOto
be9083VBbe
subject9084JJsubject
to9085TOto
tax9086NNtax
,9087,,
and9088CCand
ask9089VVask
for9090INfor
an9091DTan
instruction9092NNinstruction
that9093IN/thatthat
the9094DTthe
jury9095NNjury
give9096VVgive
the9097DTthe
after-tax9098JJafter-tax
amount9099NNamount
that9100WDTthat
would9101MDwould
equate9102VVequate
to9103TOto
the9104DTthe
lost9105VVNlose
earnings9106NNSearning
portion9107NNportion
of9108INof
the9109DTthe
judgment9110NNjudgment
.9111SENT.
And9112CCand
therein9113RBtherein
lies9114VVZlie
the9115DTthe
rub9116NNrub
,9117,,
Justice9118NPJustice
Ginsburg9119NPGinsburg
,9120,,
because9121RBbecause
,9122,,
if9123INif
the9124DTthe
lawyers9125NNSlawyer
are9126VBPbe
going9127VVGgo
to9128TOto
be9129VBbe
debating9130VVGdebate
about9131RBabout
how9132WRBhow
the9133DTthe
jury9134NNjury
is9135VBZbe
instructed9136VVNinstruct
,9137,,
it9138PPit
surely9139RBsurely
is9140VBZbe
fair9141JJfair
game9142NNgame
for9143INfor
the9144DTthe
jury9145NNjury
to9146TOto
understand9147VVunderstand
exactly9148RBexactly
what9149WPwhat
the9150DTthe
law9151NNlaw
is9152VBZbe
.9153SENT.
And9154CCand
...9155:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9156LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
And9157CCand
has9158VHZhave
any9159DTany
jury9160NNjury
ever9161RBever
been9162VBNbe
instructed9163VVNinstruct
...9164:...
has9165VHZhave
any9166DTany
railroad9167NNrailroad
attorney9168NNattorney
asked9169VVNask
for9170INfor
a9171DTa
jury9172NNjury
instruction9173NNinstruction
about9174INabout
railroad9175NNrailroad
retirement9176NNretirement
tax9177NNtax
?9178SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]9179LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
No9180NPNo
,9181,,
because9182INbecause
it9183PPit
's9184VHZhave
never9185RBnever
been9186VBNbe
taxed9187VVNtax
before9188RBbefore
.9189SENT.
That9190DTthat
's9191VBZbe
the9192DTthe
whole9193JJwhole
point9194NNpoint
.9195SENT.
This9196DTthis
whole9197JJwhole
idea9198NNidea
came9199VVDcome
up9200RBup
five9201CDfive
years9202NNSyear
ago9203RBago
when9204WRBwhen
the9205DTthe
BNSF9206NPBNSF
Railroad9207NPRailroad
asked9208VVDask
the9209DTthe
Railroad9210NPRailroad
Retirement9211NPRetirement
Board9212NPBoard
for9213INfor
gratuitous9214JJgratuitous
advice9215NNadvice
about9216RBabout
whether9217INwhether
or9218CCor
not9219RBnot
these9220DTthese
awards9221NNSaward
could9222MDcould
be9223VBbe
taxed9224VVNtax
.9225SENT.
And9226CCand
then9227RBthen
they9228PPthey
started9229VVDstart
up9230RPup
a9231DTa
process9232NNprocess
of9233INof
litigating9234VVGlitigate
this9235DTthis
issue9236NNissue
.9237SENT.
If9238INif
you9239PPyou
look9240VVPlook
at9241INat
all9242PDTall
the9243DTthe
reported9244VVNreport
decisions9245NNSdecision
,9246,,
they9247PPthey
all9248RBall
arise9249VVParise
in9250INin
the9251DTthe
last9252JJlast
couple9253NNcouple
of9254INof
years9255NNSyear
,9256,,
notwithstanding9257INnotwithstanding
the9258DTthe
fact9259NNfact
that9260IN/thatthat
,9261,,
for9262INfor
759263CD@card@
years9264NNSyear
,9265,,
from9266INfrom
the9267DTthe
inception9268NNinception
of9269INof
the9270DTthe
railroad9271NNrailroad
retirement9272NNretirement
system9273NNsystem
,9274,,
there9275EXthere
were9276VBDbe
...9277:...
this9278DTthis
was9279VBDbe
not9280RBnot
an9281DTan
issue9282NNissue
.9283SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9284LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Well9285UHWell
,9286,,
because9287INbecause
it9288PPit
was9289VBDbe
n't9290RBn't
a9291DTa
...9292:...
look9293VVlook
,9294,,
the9295DTthe
way9296NNway
I9297PPI
'm9298VBPbe
thinking9299VVGthink
about9300INabout
it9301PPit
,9302,,
and9303CCand
perhaps9304RBperhaps
you9305PPyou
'll9306MDwill
tell9307VVtell
me9308PPme
my9309PP$my
...9310:...
that9311IN/thatthat
I9312PPI
'm9313VBPbe
wrong9314JJwrong
,9315,,
but9316CCbut
very9317RBvery
...9318:...
very9319RBvery
simply9320RBsimply
,9321,,
Congress9322NPCongress
has9323VHZhave
loads9324NNSload
of9325INof
statutes9326NNSstatute
spending9327VVGspend
money9328NNmoney
.9329SENT.
And9330CCand
I9331PPI
sort9332VVPsort
of9333INof
think9334NNthink
,9335,,
a9336DTa
lot9337NNlot
of9338INof
people9339NNSpeople
think9340VVPthink
,9341,,
what9342WPwhat
they9343PPthey
spend9344VVPspend
money9345NNmoney
on9346RBon
has9347VHZhave
to9348TOto
be9349VBbe
paid9350VVNpay
for9351INfor
.9352SENT.
And9353CCand
many9354JJmany
people9355NNSpeople
think9356VVPthink
that9357IN/thatthat
taxes9358NNStaxis
is9359VBZbe
a9360DTa
good9361JJgood
way9362NNway
to9363TOto
do9364VVdo
it9365PPit
.9366SENT.
So9367RBso
,9368,,
other9369JJother
things9370NNSthing
being9371VBGbe
equal9372JJequal
...9373:...
and9374CCand
there9375EXthere
are9376VBPbe
a9377DTa
lot9378NNlot
of9379INof
other9380JJother
things9381NNSthing
...9382:...
to9383TOto
make9384VVmake
these9385DTthese
statutes9386NNSstatute
work9387VVPwork
in9388INin
harmony9389NNharmony
,9390,,
so9391RBso
you9392PPyou
tax9393VVPtax
what9394WPwhat
you9395PPyou
're9396VBPbe
going9397VVGgo
to9398TOto
get9399VVget
later9400RBRlater
paid9401JJpaid
for9402INfor
is9403VBZbe
a9404DTa
virtue9405NNvirtue
.9406SENT.
Now9407RBnow
Congress9408NPCongress
suddenly9409RBsuddenly
changed9410VVDchange
the9411DTthe
practice9412NNpractice
,9413,,
in9414INin
your9415PP$your
view9416NNview
,9417,,
because9418INbecause
it9419PPit
had9420VHDhave
been9421VBNbe
there9422RBthere
since9423INsince
19379424CD@card@
,9425,,
by9426INby
amending9427VVGamend
these9428DTthese
statutes9429NNSstatute
.9430SENT.
So9431RBso
we9432PPwe
have9433VHPhave
a9434DTa
slight9435JJslight
virtue9436NNvirtue
on9437INon
one9438CDone
side9439NNside
which9440WDTwhich
raises9441VVZraise
a9442DTa
question9443NNquestion
.9444SENT.
Why9445WRBwhy
?9446SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]9447LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Justice9448NPJustice
Breyer9449NPBreyer
,9450,,
let9451VVDlet
me9452PPme
answer9453VVanswer
your9454PP$your
question9455NNquestion
in9456INin
this9457DTthis
way9458NNway
:9459::
We9460PPwe
're9461VBPbe
not9462RBnot
here9463RBhere
saying9464VVGsay
that9465DTthat
Mr9466NPMr
.9467SENT.
Loos9468NPLoos
is9469VBZbe
entitled9470VVNentitle
to9471TOto
benefits9472NNSbenefit
that9473IN/thatthat
he9474PPhe
has9475VHZhave
n't9476RBn't
paid9477VVNpay
for9478INfor
.9479SENT.
He9480PPhe
does9481VVZdo
n't9482RBn't
want9483VVwant
the9484DTthe
...9485:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9486LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No9487RBno
,9488,,
I9489PPI
understand9490VVPunderstand
that9491RBthat
.9492SENT.
But9493CCbut
you9494PPyou
also9495RBalso
understand9496VVPunderstand
the9497DTthe
asymmetry9498NNasymmetry
argument9499NNargument
.9500SENT.
And9501CCand
there9502EXthere
are9503VBPbe
other9504JJother
asymmetries9505NNSasymmetry
,9506,,
of9507INof
course9508NNcourse
.9509SENT.
I9510PPI
'm9511VBPbe
just9512RBjust
saying9513VVGsay
...9514:...
I9515PPI
do9516VVPdo
n't9517RBn't
want9518VVwant
to9519TOto
repeat9520VVrepeat
myself9521PPmyself
.9522SENT.
I9523PPI
'm9524VBPbe
just9525RBjust
saying9526VVGsay
my9527PP$my
real9528JJreal
question9529NNquestion
here9530RBhere
...9531:...
and9532CCand
I9533PPI
...9534:...
I9535PPI
wanted9536VVDwant
you9537PPyou
to9538TOto
get9539VVget
narrow9540JJnarrow
on9541INon
it9542PPit
and9543CCand
that9544DTthat
's9545VBZbe
why9546WRBwhy
I9547PPI
asked9548VVDask
it9549PPit
...9550:...
why9551WRBwhy
?9552SENT?
Why9553WRBwhy
would9554MDwould
Congress9555NPCongress
...9556:...
did9557VVDdo
Congress9558NPCongress
want9559VVPwant
to9560TOto
change9561VVchange
it9562PPit
?9563SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]9564LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
I9565PPI
think9566VVPthink
that9567DTthat
...9568:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9569LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
In9570INin
your9571PP$your
view9572NNview
.9573SENT.
[MR. FREDERICK]9574LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
In9575INin
my9576PP$my
view9577NNview
,9578,,
the9579DTthe
reason9580NNreason
...9581:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9582LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
We9583PPwe
've9584VHPhave
been9585VBNbe
quiet9586JJquiet
about9587INabout
it9588PPit
,9589,,
by9590INby
the9591DTthe
way9592NNway
,9593,,
nobody9594NNnobody
saying9595VVGsay
a9596DTa
word9597NNword
...9598:...
[MR. FREDERICK]9599LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
Right9600NPRight
.9601SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9602LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But9603CCbut
...9604:...
and9605CCand
it9606PPit
being9607VBGbe
nearly9608RBnearly
years9609NNSyear
and9610CCand
years9611NNSyear
and9612CCand
years9613NNSyear
of9614INof
the9615DTthe
other9616JJother
thing9617NNthing
,9618,,
and9619CCand
then9620RBthen
they9621PPthey
suddenly9622RBsuddenly
changed9623VVDchange
it9624PPit
,9625,,
and9626CCand
in9627INin
your9628PP$your
view9629NNview
,9630,,
why9631WRBwhy
?9632SENT?
[MR. FREDERICK]9633LOC[MR. FREDERICK]
I9634PPI
think9635VVPthink
the9636DTthe
reason9637NNreason
is9638VBZbe
that9639IN/thatthat
it9640PPit
had9641VHDhave
very9642RBvery
little9643RBlittle
practical9644JJpractical
effect9645NNeffect
because9646INbecause
taxes9647NNStaxis
were9648VBDbe
not9649RBnot
being9650VBGbe
generated9651VVNgenerate
on9652INon
these9653DTthese
awards9654NNSaward
,9655,,
and9656CCand
there9657EXthere
was9658VBDbe
no9659DTno
real9660JJreal
question9661NNquestion
about9662INabout
the9663DTthe
benefits9664NNSbenefit
that9665WDTthat
were9666VBDbe
...9667:...
that9668WDTthat
were9669VBDbe
accruing9670VVGaccrue
.9671SENT.
In9672INin
most9673JJSmost
instances9674NNSinstance
,9675,,
the9676DTthe
only9677JJonly
time9678NNtime
when9679WRBwhen
the9680DTthe
benefits9681NNSbenefit
side9682NNside
actually9683RBactually
matters9684VVZmatter
for9685INfor
these9686DTthese
awards9687NNSaward
is9688VBZbe
when9689WRBwhen
you9690PPyou
can9691MDcan
allocate9692VVallocate
dollars9693NNSdollar
for9694INfor
a9695DTa
few9696JJfew
months9697NNSmonth
in9698INin
order9699NNorder
to9700TOto
get9701VVget
beyond9702INbeyond
the9703DTthe
20-year9704JJ20-year
threshold9705NNthreshold
or9706CCor
the9707DTthe
30-year9708JJ30-year
threshold9709NNthreshold
.9710SENT.
It9711PPit
does9712VVZdo
n't9713RBn't
happen9714VVhappen
very9715RBvery
often9716RBoften
.9717SENT.
And9718CCand
it9719PPit
...9720:...
when9721WRBwhen
it9722PPit
does9723VVZdo
happen9724VVhappen
,9725,,
a9726DTa
practice9727NNpractice
has9728VHZhave
developed9729VVNdevelop
where9730WRBwhere
the9731DTthe
worker9732NNworker
actually9733RBactually
pays9734VVZpay
for9735INfor
those9736DTthose
topped-up9737JJtopped-up
months9738NNSmonth
.9739SENT.
So9740RBso
take9741VVtake
,9742,,
for9743INfor
instance9744NNinstance
,9745,,
a9746DTa
worker9747NNworker
who9748WPwho
's9749VHZhave
got9750VVNget
199751CD@card@
years9752NNSyear
and9753CCand
109754CD@card@
months9755NNSmonth
of9756INof
service9757NNservice
.9758SENT.
He9759PPhe
gets9760VVZget
hurt9761VVNhurt
on9762INon
the9763DTthe
job9764NNjob
.9765SENT.
It9766PPit
's9767VBZbe
the9768DTthe
railroad9769NNrailroad
's9770POS's
fault9771NNfault
.9772SENT.
He9773PPhe
gets9774VVZget
his9775PP$his
FA9776NNfa
...9777:...
FELA9778NNFELA
judgment9779NNjudgment
.9780SENT.
What9781WPWhat
that9782DTthat
19809783CD@card@
tax9784NNtax
memorandum9785NNmemorandum
was9786VBDbe
talking9787VVGtalk
about9788RBabout
,9789,,
the9790DTthe
employee9791NNemployee
went9792VVDgo
forward9793RBforward
and9794CCand
said9795VVDsay
:9796::
I9797PPI
'm9798VBPbe
willing9799JJwilling
to9800TOto
pay9801VVpay
my9802PP$my
taxes9803NNStaxis
.9804SENT.
I9805PPI
'd9806MDwould
like9807VVlike
to9808TOto
get9809VVget
credit9810NNcredit
for9811INfor
two9812CDtwo
months9813NNSmonth
so9814RBso
that9815IN/thatthat
I9816PPI
can9817MDcan
get9818VVget
my9819PP$my
209820CD@card@
years9821NNSyear
for9822INfor
my9823PP$my
service9824NNservice
.9825SENT.
And9826CCand
the9827DTthe
IRS9828NPIRS
said9829VVDsay
:9830::
That9831WDTthat
's9832VBZbe
okay9833JJokay
.9834SENT.
And9835CCand
that9836WDTthat
had9837VHDhave
been9838VBNbe
the9839DTthe
way9840NNway
the9841DTthe
statute9842NNstatute
was9843VBDbe
worded9844VVNword
between9845INbetween
19469846CD@card@
and9847CCand
19759848CD@card@
.9849SENT.
Now9850RBnow
I9851PPI
understand9852VVPunderstand
that9853IN/thatthat
,9854,,
since9855INsince
19759856CD@card@
,9857,,
this9858DTthis
informal9859JJinformal
practice9860NNpractice
has9861VHZhave
continued9862VVNcontinue
.9863SENT.
It9864PPit
's9865VBZbe
not9866RBnot
used9867VVNuse
very9868RBvery
often9869RBoften
.9870SENT.
But9871CCbut
we9872PPwe
're9873VBPbe
not9874RBnot
talking9875VVGtalk
about9876INabout
a9877DTa
situation9878NNsituation
where9879WRBwhere
you9880PPyou
've9881VHPhave
got9882VVNget
workers9883NNSworker
that9884WDTthat
are9885VBPbe
out9886RBout
there9887RBthere
getting9888VVGget
benefits9889NNSbenefit
based9890VVNbase
on9891INon
these9892DTthese
judgments9893NNSjudgment
because9894INbecause
the9895DTthe
judgments9896NNSjudgment
typically9897RBtypically
do9898VVPdo
n't9899RBn't
allocate9900VVallocate
to9901TOto
particular9902JJparticular
months9903NNSmonth
.9904SENT.
And9905CCand
if9906INif
you9907PPyou
do9908VVPdo
not9909RBnot
allocate9910VVallocate
the9911DTthe
back-pay9912NNback-pay
award9913NNaward
to9914TOto
particular9915JJparticular
months9916NNSmonth
,9917,,
then9918RBthen
the9919DTthe
Railroad9920NPRailroad
Retirement9921NPRetirement
Board9922NPBoard
does9923VVZdo
n't9924RBn't
have9925VHhave
a9926DTa
basis9927NNbasis
for9928INfor
saying9929VVGsay
how9930WRBhow
you9931PPyou
count9932VVPcount
it9933PPit
up9934RPup
toward9935INtoward
the9936DTthe
...9937:...
the9938DTthe
creditable9939JJcreditable
service9940NNservice
.9941SENT.
And9942CCand
because9943INbecause
the9944DTthe
way9945NNway
the9946DTthe
benefits9947NNSbenefit
work9948VVPwork
,9949,,
it9950PPit
does9951VVZdo
n't9952RBn't
typically9953RBtypically
benefit9954VVbenefit
you9955PPyou
to9956TOto
have9957VHhave
189958CD@card@
years9959NNSyear
of9960INof
service9961NNservice
or9962CCor
179963CD@card@
years9964NNSyear
of9965INof
service9966NNservice
.9967SENT.
You9968PPyou
've9969VHPhave
got9970VVNget
to9971TOto
get9972VVget
to9973TOto
209974CD@card@
years9975NNSyear
now9976RBnow
in9977INin
order9978NNorder
to9979TOto
get9980VVget
to9981TOto
a9982DTa
new9983JJnew
threshold9984NNthreshold
.9985SENT.
This9986DTthis
matter9987NNmatter
as9988INas
a9989DTa
practical9990JJpractical
thing9991NNthing
,9992,,
Justice9993NPJustice
Breyer9994NPBreyer
,9995,,
simply9996RBsimply
was9997VBDbe
not9998RBnot
deemed9999VVNdeem
to10000TOto
be10001VBbe
so10002RBso
significant10003JJsignificant
as10004RBas
to10005TOto
affect10006VVaffect
things10007NNSthing
.10008SENT.
I10009PPI
would10010MDwould
further10011RBRfurther
point10012VVpoint
out10013RPout
,10014,,
as10015INas
the10016DTthe
Board10017NPBoard
,10018,,
the10019DTthe
Railroad10020NPRailroad
Retirement10021NPRetirement
Board10022NPBoard
's10023POS's
latest10024JJSlate
annual10025JJannual
report10026NNreport
indicates10027VVZindicate
,10028,,
the10029DTthe
retirement10030NNretirement
system10031NNsystem
is10032VBZbe
going10033VVGgo
to10034TOto
be10035VBbe
solvent10036JJsolvent
for10037INfor
the10038DTthe
next10039JJnext
2910040CD@card@
years10041NNSyear
.10042SENT.
You10043PPyou
've10044VHPhave
got10045VVNget
to10046TOto
ask10047VVask
the10048DTthe
question10049NNquestion
:10050::
What10051WPWhat
difference10052NNdifference
does10053VVZdo
it10054PPit
make10055VVmake
whether10056INwhether
or10057CCor
not10058RBnot
you10059PPyou
impose10060VVimpose
the10061DTthe
tax10062NNtax
,10063,,
except10064INexcept
as10065INas
a10066DTa
means10067NNmeans
of10068INof
altering10069VVGalter
the10070DTthe
bargaining10071NNbargaining
leverage10072NNleverage
between10073INbetween
the10074DTthe
railroads10075NNSrailroad
and10076CCand
their10077PP$their
workers10078NNSworker
,10079,,
when10080WRBwhen
the10081DTthe
railroads10082NNSrailroad
have10083VHPhave
breached10084VVNbreach
the10085DTthe
duty10086NNduty
of10087INof
due10088JJdue
care10089NNcare
and10090CCand
caused10091VVNcause
injury10092NNinjury
to10093TOto
their10094PP$their
workers10095NNSworker
.10096SENT.
If10097INif
the10098DTthe
Court10099NPCourt
has10100VHZhave
nothing10101NNnothing
further10102RBRfurther
,10103,,
we10104PPwe
'll10105MDwill
submit10106VVsubmit
.10107SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]10108LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank10109VVthank
you10110PPyou
,10111,,
counsel10112NNcounsel
.10113SENT.
Five10114CDFive
minutes10115NNSminute
,10116,,
Ms10117NNMs
.10118SENT.
Blatt10119NPBlatt
.10120SENT.
[MS. BLATT]10121LOC[MS. BLATT]
Thank10122VVthank
you10123PPyou
,10124,,
Mr10125NPMr
.10126SENT.
Chief10127NPChief
Justice10128NPJustice
,10129,,
and10130CCand
may10131MDmay
it10132PPit
please10133VVplease
the10134DTthe
Court10135NPCourt
:10136::
Justice10137NPJustice
Ginsburg10138NPGinsburg
,10139,,
on10140INon
your10141PP$your
jury10142NNjury
instruction10143NNinstruction
point10144NNpoint
,10145,,
I10146PPI
...10147:...
I10148PPI
do10149VVPdo
n't10150RBn't
think10151VVthink
there10152EXthere
's10153VBZbe
anything10154NNanything
in10155INin
the10156DTthe
history10157NNhistory
of10158INof
American10159JJAmerican
jurisprudence10160NNjurisprudence
that10161IN/thatthat
you10162PPyou
get10163VVPget
a10164DTa
instruction10165NNinstruction
under10166INunder
FICA10167NPFICA
that10168IN/thatthat
you10169PPyou
get10170VVPget
to10171TOto
tell10172VVtell
the10173DTthe
jury10174NNjury
to10175TOto
gross-up10176NNgross-up
.10177SENT.
So10178RBso
I10179PPI
just10180RBjust
do10181VVPdo
n't10182RBn't
know10183VVknow
where10184WRBwhere
in10185INin
law10186NNlaw
they10187PPthey
think10188VVPthink
you10189PPyou
'd10190MDwould
be10191VBbe
even10192RBeven
entitled10193VVNentitle
to10194TOto
that10195DTthat
instruction10196NNinstruction
.10197SENT.
Second10198RBsecond
,10199,,
Justice10200NPJustice
Kavanaugh10201NPKavanaugh
,10202,,
in10203INin
terms10204NNSterm
of10205INof
the10206DTthe
Nierotko10207NPNierotko
,10208,,
Quality10209NPQuality
Stores10210NPSStores
was10211VBDbe
a10212DTa
...10213:...
was10214VBDbe
the10215DTthe
FICA10216NPFICA
side10217NNside
.10218SENT.
And10219CCand
,10220,,
also10221RBalso
,10222,,
Justice10223NPJustice
...10224:...
Justice10225NPJustice
...10226:...
Justice10227NPJustice
Scalia10228NPScalia
signed10229VVDsign
Quality10230NPQuality
Stores10231NPSStores
.10232SENT.
So10233RBso
I10234PPI
do10235VVPdo
think10236VVthink
that10237IN/thatthat
that10238DTthat
relates10239VVZrelate
to10240TOto
...10241:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10242LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well10243UHWell
,10244,,
what10245WPwhat
do10246VVPdo
we10247PPwe
do10248VVPdo
...10249:...
you10250PPyou
say10251VVPsay
that10252IN/thatthat
there10253EXthere
's10254VBZbe
no10255DTno
basis10256NNbasis
for10257INfor
a10258DTa
jury10259NNjury
instruction10260NNinstruction
to10261TOto
gross-up10262NNgross-up
,10263,,
but10264CCbut
it10265PPit
...10266:...
it10267PPit
sounds10268VVZsound
like10269INlike
there10270EXthere
's10271VBZbe
for10272INfor
a10273DTa
long10274JJlong
time10275NNtime
been10276VBNbe
a10277DTa
jury10278NNjury
instruction10279NNinstruction
requiring10280VVGrequire
the10281DTthe
jury10282NNjury
to10283TOto
...10284:...
to10285TOto
net-down10286NNnet-down
.10287SENT.
[MS. BLATT]10288LOC[MS. BLATT]
Right10289NPRight
,10290,,
and10291CCand
...10292:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10293LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Is10294VBZbe
n't10295RBn't
what10296WPwhat
's10297VBZbe
good10298JJgood
for10299INfor
the10300DTthe
goose10301NNgoose
good10302JJgood
for10303INfor
the10304DTthe
gander10305NNgander
on10306INon
this10307DTthis
?10308SENT?
[MS. BLATT]10309LOC[MS. BLATT]
Sure10310NPSure
,10311,,
if10312INif
someone10313NNsomeone
wants10314VVZwant
to10315TOto
argue10316VVargue
it10317PPit
.10318SENT.
No10319DTno
court10320NNcourt
has10321VHZhave
bought10322VVNbuy
it10323PPit
.10324SENT.
But10325CCbut
I10326PPI
think10327VVPthink
the10328DTthe
reason10329NNreason
why10330WRBwhy
in10331INin
Liepelt10332NPLiepelt
is10333VBZbe
because10334INbecause
there10335EXthere
was10336VBDbe
like10337INlike
a10338DTa
,10339,,
I10340PPI
do10341VVPdo
n't10342RBn't
know10343VVknow
,10344,,
percent10345NNpercent
increase10346NNincrease
for10347INfor
inflation10348NNinflation
because10349INbecause
taxes10350NNStaxis
make10351VVPmake
up10352RPup
,10353,,
like10354VVlike
,10355,,
3010356CD@card@
,10357,,
4010358CD@card@
percent10359NNpercent
,10360,,
and10361CCand
so10362RBso
the10363DTthe
Court10364NPCourt
said10365VVDsay
you10366PPyou
're10367VBPbe
entitled10368VVNentitle
to10369TOto
this10370DTthis
instruction10371NNinstruction
.10372SENT.
But10373CCbut
just10374RBjust
remember10375VVremember
there10376EXthere
are10377VBPbe
jury10378NNjury
verdicts10379NNSverdict
every10380DTevery
day10381NNday
that10382WDTthat
are10383VBPbe
subject10384JJsubject
to10385TOto
both10386DTboth
income10387NNincome
taxes10388NNStaxis
and10389CCand
FICA10390NPFICA
taxes10391NNStaxis
.10392SENT.
And10393CCand
I10394PPI
just10395RBjust
have10396VHPhave
never10397RBnever
seen10398VVNsee
a10399DTa
case10400NNcase
where10401WRBwhere
you10402PPyou
're10403VBPbe
entitled10404VVNentitle
to10405TOto
...10406:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10407LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
What10408WPWhat
...10409:...
what10410WPwhat
do10411VVPdo
you10412PPyou
say10413VVPsay
to10414TOto
Mr10415NPMr
.10416SENT.
Frederick10417NPFrederick
's10418POS's
point10419NNpoint
that10420IN/thatthat
the10421DTthe
reason10422NNreason
why10423WRBwhy
the10424DTthe
...10425:...
the10426DTthe
railroad10427NNrailroad
's10428VBZbe
so10429RBso
interested10430JJinterested
in10431INin
this10432DTthis
is10433VBZbe
to10434TOto
increase10435VVincrease
its10436PP$its
leverage10437NNleverage
in10438INin
settlement10439NNsettlement
negotiations10440NNSnegotiation
,10441,,
where10442WRBwhere
the10443DTthe
parties10444NNSparty
can10445MDcan
allocate10446VVallocate
awards10447NNSaward
,10448,,
and10449CCand
...10450:...
and10451CCand
here10452RBhere
you10453PPyou
're10454VBPbe
arguing10455VVGargue
pretty10456RBpretty
strenuously10457RBstrenuously
that10458IN/thatthat
they10459PPthey
should10460MDshould
n't10461RBn't
be10462VBbe
able10463JJable
to10464TOto
...10465:...
to10466TOto
...10467:...
to10468TOto
...10469:...
to10470TOto
be10471VBbe
...10472:...
to10473TOto
take10474VVtake
into10475INinto
cognizance10476NNcognizance
the10477DTthe
tax10478NNtax
issue10479NNissue
on10480INon
...10481:...
in10482INin
...10483:...
in10484INin
a10485DTa
jury10486NNjury
judgment10487NNjudgment
?10488SENT?
[MS. BLATT]10489LOC[MS. BLATT]
Right10490NPRight
.10491SENT.
I10492PPI
...10493:...
I10494PPI
mean10495VVPmean
,10496,,
I10497PPI
...10498:...
I10499PPI
told10500VVDtell
you10501PPyou
why10502WRBwhy
we10503PPwe
're10504VBPbe
here10505RBhere
.10506SENT.
It10507PPit
is10508VBZbe
not10509RBnot
to10510TOto
gain10511VVgain
leverage10512NNleverage
.10513SENT.
The10514DTthe
one10515CDone
thing10516NNthing
I10517PPI
did10518VVDdo
n't10519RBn't
say10520VVsay
,10521,,
or10522CCor
I10523PPI
thought10524VVDthink
I10525PPI
said10526VVDsay
,10527,,
but10528CCbut
apparently10529RBapparently
I10530PPI
did10531VVDdo
n't10532RBn't
,10533,,
was10534VBDbe
that10535IN/thatthat
the10536DTthe
railroads10537NNSrailroad
are10538VBPbe
very10539RBvery
concerned10540VVNconcern
that10541IN/thatthat
the10542DTthe
rates10543NNSrate
are10544VBPbe
going10545VVGgo
to10546TOto
go10547VVgo
up10548RPup
.10549SENT.
If10550INif
there10551EXthere
's10552VBZbe
a10553DTa
mismatch10554NNmismatch
,10555,,
they10556PPthey
're10557VBPbe
directly10558RBdirectly
...10559:...
you10560PPyou
know10561VVPknow
,10562,,
they10563PPthey
pay10564VVPpay
two-thirds10565NNStwo-third
of10566INof
any10567DTany
rate10568NNrate
increase10569NNincrease
.10570SENT.
But10571CCbut
,10572,,
on10573INon
the10574DTthe
settlement10575NNsettlement
leverage10576NNleverage
,10577,,
whatever10578WDTwhatever
you10579PPyou
think10580VVPthink
happens10581VVZhappen
about10582INabout
allocation10583NNallocation
...10584:...
and10585CCand
this10586DTthis
goes10587VVZgo
to10588TOto
you10589PPyou
,10590,,
Justice10591NPJustice
Sotomayor10592NPSotomayor
...10593:...
regardless10594RBregardless
of10595INof
what10596WPwhat
you10597PPyou
do10598VVPdo
in10599INin
this10600DTthis
case10601NNcase
,10602,,
23110603CD@card@
for10604INfor
the10605DTthe
benefits10606NNSbenefit
side10607NNside
requires10608VVZrequire
allocation10609NNallocation
in10610INin
every10611DTevery
case10612NNcase
for10613INfor
personal10614JJpersonal
injury10615NNinjury
judgment10616NNjudgment
.10617SENT.
Now10618RBnow
,10619,,
if10620INif
we10621PPwe
prevail10622VVPprevail
,10623,,
whatever10624WDTwhatever
happens10625VVZhappen
in10626INin
terms10627NNSterm
of10628INof
allocation10629NNallocation
on10630INon
the10631DTthe
taxing10632VVGtax
side10633NNside
,10634,,
it10635PPit
is10636VBZbe
treated10637VVNtreat
with10638INwith
parity10639NNparity
on10640INon
the10641DTthe
benefits10642NNSbenefit
side10643NNside
.10644SENT.
And10645CCand
that10646WDTthat
is10647VBZbe
to10648TOto
say10649VVsay
,10650,,
if10651INif
employees10652NNSemployee
are10653VBPbe
underreporting10654VVGunderreport
their10655PP$their
taxes10656NNStaxis
,10657,,
they10658PPthey
're10659VBPbe
going10660VVGgo
to10661TOto
get10662VVget
an10663DTan
underreporting10664VVGunderreport
in10665INin
benefits10666NNSbenefit
.10667SENT.
If10668INif
they10669PPthey
win10670VVPwin
,10671,,
there10672EXthere
is10673VBZbe
no10674DTno
downside10675NNdownside
,10676,,
and10677CCand
the10678DTthe
law10679NNlaw
allows10680VVZallow
them10681PPthem
to10682TOto
allocate10683VVallocate
an10684DTan
entire10685JJentire
award10686NNaward
to10687TOto
the10688DTthe
benefits10689NNSbenefit
side10690NNside
,10691,,
without10692INwithout
any10693DTany
tax10694NNtax
burden10695NNburden
.10696SENT.
So10697RBso
I10698PPI
think10699VVPthink
we10700PPwe
win10701VVwin
in10702INin
terms10703NNSterm
of10704INof
the10705DTthe
dynamic10706NNdynamic
to10707TOto
the10708DTthe
net10709JJnet
benefit10710NNbenefit
on10711INon
Treasury10712NPTreasury
.10713SENT.
If10714INif
you10715PPyou
're10716VBPbe
worried10717VVNworry
about10718INabout
settlement10719NNsettlement
dynamics10720NNSdynamics
,10721,,
I10722PPI
mean10723VVPmean
,10724,,
that10725WDTthat
is10726VBZbe
because10727INbecause
of10728INof
the10729DTthe
h10730NNh
...10731:...
h10732NNh
(10733((
210734CD2
)10735))
,10736,,
h10737NNh
(10738((
210739CD2
)10740))
,10741,,
yes10742UHyes
,10743,,
in10744INin
23110745CD@card@
allows10746VVZallow
employees10747NNSemployee
to10748TOto
allocate10749VVallocate
.10750SENT.
The10751DTthe
third10752JJthird
thing10753NNthing
,10754,,
I10755PPI
do10756VVPdo
want10757VVwant
to10758TOto
defend10759VVdefend
the10760DTthe
government10761NNgovernment
here10762RBhere
,10763,,
because10764RBbecause
...10765:...
about10766INabout
this10767DTthis
198110768CD@card@
TAM10769NNtam
.10770SENT.
The10771DTthe
reason10772NNreason
probably10773RBprobably
the10774DTthe
government10775NNgovernment
did10776VVDdo
n't10777RBn't
cite10778VVcite
it10779PPit
is10780VBZbe
because10781INbecause
it10782PPit
was10783VBDbe
n't10784RBn't
until10785INuntil
the10786DTthe
red10787JJred
brief10788NNbrief
that10789WDTthat
made10790VVDmake
all10791PDTall
this10792DTthis
huge10793JJhuge
thing10794NNthing
about10795RBabout
,10796,,
oh10797UHoh
,10798,,
years10799NNSyear
and10800CCand
8010801CD@card@
years10802NNSyear
,10803,,
so10804RBso
,10805,,
I10806PPI
mean10807VVPmean
,10808,,
the10809DTthe
government10810NNgovernment
was10811VBDbe
n't10812RBn't
aware10813JJaware
it10814PPit
was10815VBDbe
going10816VVGgo
to10817TOto
be10818VBbe
accused10819VVNaccuse
of10820INof
any10821DTany
of10822INof
this10823RBthis
when10824WRBwhen
they10825PPthey
had10826VHDhave
a10827DTa
regulation10828NNregulation
on10829INon
point10830NNpoint
that10831WDTthat
said10832VVDsay
any10833DTany
amounts10834NNSamount
paid10835VVNpay
for10836INfor
time10837NNtime
lost10838VVDlose
.10839SENT.
So10840RBso
we10841PPwe
cited10842VVDcite
it10843PPit
in10844INin
our10845PP$our
brief10846NNbrief
.10847SENT.
And10848CCand
also10849RBalso
,10850,,
on10851INon
the10852DTthe
time10853NNtime
lost10854VVDlose
,10855,,
the10856DTthe
bottom10857JJbottom
line10858NNline
of10859INof
where10860WRBwhere
I10861PPI
want10862VVPwant
to10863TOto
end10864VVend
,10865,,
I10866PPI
mean10867VVPmean
,10868,,
the10869DTthe
problem10870NNproblem
for10871INfor
the10872DTthe
other10873JJother
side10874NNside
,10875,,
whatever10876WDTwhatever
he10877PPhe
wants10878VVZwant
to10879TOto
say10880VVsay
about10881INabout
the10882DTthe
language10883NNlanguage
,10884,,
he10885PPhe
concedes10886VVZconcede
time10887NNtime
lost10888VVDlose
payments10889NNSpayment
are10890VBPbe
covered10891VVNcover
.10892SENT.
I10893PPI
mean10894VVPmean
,10895,,
one10896CDone
part10897NNpart
of10898INof
his10899PP$his
argument10900NNargument
,10901,,
he10902PPhe
fought10903VVDfight
it10904PPit
.10905SENT.
In10906INin
another10907DTanother
part10908NNpart
of10909INof
the10910DTthe
argument10911NNargument
,10912,,
he10913PPhe
has10914VHZhave
to10915TOto
concede10916VVconcede
it10917PPit
because10918INbecause
he10919PPhe
concedes10920VVZconcede
that10921IN/thatthat
vacation10922NNvacation
pay10923NNpay
,10924,,
sickness10925NNsickness
,10926,,
I10927PPI
mean10928VVPmean
,10929,,
whether10930INwhether
or10931CCor
not10932RBnot
he10933PPhe
wants10934VVZwant
to10935TOto
admit10936VVadmit
it10937PPit
,10938,,
you10939PPyou
do10940VVPdo
n't10941RBn't
work10942VVwork
on10943INon
Christmas10944NPChristmas
Day10945NPDay
,10946,,
and10947CCand
that10948WDTthat
's10949VBZbe
considered10950VVNconsider
time10951NNtime
lost10952VVDlose
,10953,,
and10954CCand
you10955PPyou
...10956:...
that10957WDTthat
's10958VBZbe
for10959INfor
services10960NNSservice
rendered10961VVNrender
.10962SENT.
So10963INso
the10964DTthe
only10965JJonly
thing10966NNthing
,10967,,
what10968WDTwhat
his10969PP$his
case10970NNcase
comes10971VVZcome
down10972RPdown
to10973TOto
is10974VBZbe
whether10975INwhether
a10976DTa
negligence10977NNnegligence
judgment10978NNjudgment
is10979VBZbe
somehow10980RBsomehow
different10981JJdifferent
from10982INfrom
the10983DTthe
type10984NNtype
of10985INof
payments10986NNSpayment
that10987IN/thatthat
he10988PPhe
concedes10989VVZconcede
.10990SENT.
And10991CCand
we10992PPwe
do10993VVPdo
n't10994RBn't
think10995VVthink
there10996EXthere
's10997VBZbe
any10998DTany
textual10999JJtextual
or11000CCor
purposeful11001JJpurposeful
and11002CCand
,11003,,
you11004PPyou
know11005VVPknow
,11006,,
in11007INin
any11008DTany
event11009NNevent
,11010,,
I11011PPI
hate11012VVPhate
to11013TOto
cite11014VVcite
it11015PPit
,11016,,
but11017CCbut
I11018PPI
will11019MDwill
end11020VVend
with11021INwith
Chevron11022NPChevron
.11023SENT.
I11024PPI
mean11025VVPmean
,11026,,
he11027PPhe
has11028VHZhave
to11029TOto
win11030VVwin
under11031INunder
the11032DTthe
plain11033JJplain
language11034NNlanguage
for11035INfor
you11036PPyou
to11037TOto
affirm11038VVaffirm
.11039SENT.
Thank11040VVthank
you11041PPyou
.11042SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11043LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank11044VVthank
you11045PPyou
,11046,,
Ms11047NNMs
.11048SENT.
Blatt11049NPBlatt
.11050SENT.
Counsel11051NNcounsel
,11052,,
the11053DTthe
case11054NNcase
is11055VBZbe
submitted11056VVNsubmit
.11057SENT.