<s> /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/ptreetagger/Bostock.xml-src.tt /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/treetagger/Bostock.xml-out.tt pos tagset built from model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par en lemma of the model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par - [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We2PPwe 'll3MDwill hear4VVhear argument5NNargument first6RBfirst this7DTthis morning8NNmorning in9INin Case10NPCase 17-161811CD@card@ ,12,, Bostock13NPBostock versus14CCversus Clayton15NPClayton County16NPCounty ,17,, and18CCand the19DTthe consolidated20JJconsolidated case21NNcase .22SENT. Ms23NNMs .24SENT. Karlan25NPKarlan .26SENT.

[MS. KARLAN]27LOC[MS. KARLAN] Thank28VVthank you29PPyou ,30,, Mr31NPMr .32SENT. Chief33NPChief Justice34NPJustice ,35,, and36CCand may37MDmay it38PPit please39VVplease the40DTthe Court41NPCourt :42:: When43WRBwhen a44DTa employer45NNemployer fires46VVZfire a47DTa male48JJmale employee49NNemployee for50INfor dating51VVGdate men52NNSman but53CCbut does54VVZdo not55RBnot fire56VVfire female57JJfemale employees58NNSemployee who59WPwho date60VVPdate men61NNSman ,62,, he63PPhe violates64VVZviolate Title65NPTitle VII66NPVII .67SENT. The68DTthe employer69NNemployer has70VHZhave ,71,, in72INin the73DTthe words74NNSword of75INof Section76NPSection 70377CD@card@ (78(( a79DTa )80)) ,81,, discriminated82VVNdiscriminate against83INagainst the84DTthe man85NNman because86INbecause he87PPhe treats88VVZtreat that89DTthat man90NNman worse91JJRbad than92INthan women93NNSwoman who94WPwho want95VVPwant to96TOto do97VVdo the98DTthe same99JJsame thing100NNthing .101SENT. And102CCand that103DTthat discrimination104NNdiscrimination is105VBZbe because106INbecause of107INof sex108NNsex ,109,, again110RBagain in111INin the112DTthe words113NNSword of114INof Section115NPSection 703116CD@card@ (117(( a118DTa )119)) ,120,, because121INbecause the122DTthe adverse123JJadverse employment124NNemployment action125NNaction is126VBZbe based127VVNbase on128INon the129DTthe male130JJmale employee131NNemployee 's132POS's failure133NNfailure to134TOto conform135VVconform to136TOto a137DTa particular138JJparticular expectation139NNexpectation about140INabout how141WRBhow men142NNSman should143MDshould behave144VVbehave ;145:; namely146RBnamely ,147,, that148IN/thatthat men149NNSman should150MDshould be151VBbe attracted152VVNattract only153RBonly to154TOto women155NNSwoman and156CCand not157RBnot to158TOto men159NNSman .160SENT. There161EXthere is162VBZbe no163DTno analytic164JJanalytic difference165NNdifference between166INbetween this167DTthis kind168NNkind of169INof discrimination170NNdiscrimination and171CCand forms172NNSform of173INof discrimination174NNdiscrimination that175WDTthat have176VHPhave been177VBNbe already178RBalready recognized179VVNrecognize by180INby every181DTevery court182NNcourt to183TOto have184VHhave addressed185VVNaddress them186PPthem .187SENT. For188INfor example189NNexample ,190,, discrimination191NNdiscrimination against192INagainst men193NNSman who194WPwho are195VBPbe effeminate196JJeffeminate rather197RBrather than198INthan macho199NNmacho .200SENT. Like201INlike the202DTthe discrimination203NNdiscrimination here204RBhere ,205,, that206IN/thatthat discrimination207NNdiscrimination is208VBZbe because209INbecause of210INof non-conformity211NNnon-conformity with212INwith an213DTan expectation214NNexpectation about215INabout how216WRBhow men217NNSman should218MDshould behave219VVbehave .220SENT. The221DTthe attempt222NNattempt to223TOto carve224VVcarve out225RPout discrimination226NNdiscrimination against227INagainst men228NNSman for229INfor being230VBGbe gay231JJgay from232INfrom Title233NPTitle VII234NPVII cannot235MDcan be236VBbe administered237VVNadminister with238INwith either239DTeither consistency240NNconsistency or241CCor integrity242NNintegrity .243SENT. In244INin the245DTthe words246NNSword of247INof the248DTthe en249NNen banc250NNbanc Second251NPSecond Circuit252NPCircuit ,253,, it254PPit forces255VVZforce judges256NNSjudge to257TOto result258VVresult ...259:... resort260NNresort to261TOto lexical262JJlexical bean263NNbean counting264NNcounting where265WRBwhere they266PPthey count267VVPcount up268RPup the269DTthe frequency270NNfrequency of271INof epithets272NNSepithet ,273,, such274JJsuch as275INas "276``" fag277NNfag ,278,, "279''" "280``" gay281JJgay ,282,, "283''" "284``" queer285JJqueer ,286,, "287''" "288``" real289JJreal man290NNman ,291,, "292''" and293CCand "294``" fem295NNfem ,296,, "297''" to298TOto determine299VVdetermine whether300INwhether or301CCor not302RBnot discrimination303NNdiscrimination is304VBZbe based305VVNbase on306INon sex307NNsex or308CCor sexual309JJsexual orientation310NNorientation .311SENT. That312DTthat attempt313NNattempt is314VBZbe futile315JJfutile because316INbecause when317WRBwhen a318DTa man319NNman is320VBZbe discriminated321VVNdiscriminate against322INagainst for323INfor being324VBGbe gay325JJgay ,326,, he327PPhe is328VBZbe discriminated329VVNdiscriminate against330INagainst for331INfor not332RBnot conforming333VVGconform to334TOto an335DTan expectation336NNexpectation about337INabout how338WRBhow men339NNSman should340MDshould behave341VVbehave .342SENT. Finally343RBfinally ,344,, the345DTthe possibility346NNpossibility that347IN/thatthat some348DTsome employers349NNSemployer ,350,, but351CCbut not352RBnot the353DTthe employers354NNSemployer here355RBhere ,356,, may357MDmay have358VHhave policies359NNSpolicy of360INof denying361VVGdeny employment362NNemployment opportunities363NNSopportunity both364CCboth to365TOto gay366JJgay men367NNSman and368CCand to369TOto lesbians370NNSlesbian does371VVZdo not372RBnot change373VVchange the374DTthe unlawfulness375NNunlawfulness of376INof what377WPwhat was378VBDbe alleged379VVNallege by380INby the381DTthe employees382NNSemployee here383RBhere .384SENT. Labeling385VVGlabel those386DTthose policies387NNSpolicy under388INunder an389DTan umbrella390NNumbrella phrase391NNphrase like392INlike "393``" sexual394JJsexual orientation395NNorientation discrimination396NNdiscrimination "397``" cannot398MDcan hide399VVhide the400DTthe fact401NNfact that402IN/thatthat such403PDTsuch an404DTan employer405NNemployer is406VBZbe a407DTa double408JJdouble discriminator409NNdiscriminator .410SENT. It411PPit discriminates412VVZdiscriminate against413INagainst men414NNSman who415WPwho do416VVPdo not417RBnot conform418VVconform to419TOto a420DTa male421JJmale stereotype422NNstereotype ,423,, and424CCand it425PPit discriminates426VVZdiscriminate against427INagainst women428NNSwoman who429WPwho do430VVPdo not431RBnot conform432VVconform to433TOto an434DTan expectation435NNexpectation about436INabout female437JJfemale ...438:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]439LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Ms440NNMs .441SENT. Karlan442NPKarlan ...443:... Ms444NNMs .445SENT. Karlan446NPKarlan ,447,, how448WRBhow do449VVPdo you450PPyou answer451VVanswer the452DTthe argument453NNargument that454IN/thatthat back455RBback in456INin 1964457CD@card@ ,458,, this459DTthis could460MDcould not461RBnot have462VHhave been463VBNbe in464INin Congress465NPCongress 's466POS's mind467NNmind because468INbecause in469INin ...470:... in471INin many472JJmany states473NNSstate male474JJmale same-sex475NNsame-sex relations476NNSrelation was477VBDbe a478DTa criminal479JJcriminal offense480NNoffense ;481:; the482DTthe American483JJAmerican Psychiatric484JJpsychiatric Association485NNassociation labeled486VVDlabel homosexuality487NNhomosexuality a488DTa ...489:... a490DTa mental491JJmental illness492NNillness ?493SENT? [MS. KARLAN]494LOC[MS. KARLAN] Well495UHwell ,496,, I497PPI think498VVPthink you499PPyou read500VVPread the501DTthe words502NNSword of503INof the504DTthe statute505NNstatute .506SENT. And507CCand this508DTthis Court509NPCourt has510VHZhave recognized511VVNrecognize again512RBagain and513CCand again514RBagain forms515NNSform of516INof sex517NNsex discrimination518NNdiscrimination that519WDTthat were520VBDbe not521RBnot in522INin Congress523NPCongress 's524POS's contemplation525NNcontemplation in526INin 1964527CD@card@ .528SENT. In529INin 1964530CD@card@ ,531,, those532DTthose were533VBDbe the534DTthe days535NNSday of536INof Mad537JJmad Men538NNSman ,539,, so540RBso the541DTthe idea542NNidea that543IN/thatthat sexual544JJsexual harassment545NNharassment would546MDwould have547VHhave been548VBNbe reached549VVNreach ,550,, most551JJSmost courts552NNScourt did553VVDdo n't554RBn't find555VVfind sexual556JJsexual harassment557NNharassment to558TOto be559VBbe actionable560JJactionable until561INuntil this562DTthis Court563NPCourt did564VVDdo .565SENT. In566INin Price567NPPrice Waterhouse568NPWaterhouse ,569,, this570DTthis Court571NPCourt recognized572VVDrecognize that573DTthat discrimination574NNdiscrimination against575INagainst a576DTa woman577NNwoman who578WPwho cursed579VVDcurse like580INlike a581DTa sailor582NNsailor ,583,, walked584VVDwalk like585INlike a586DTa man587NNman ,588,, and589CCand did590VVDdo n't591RBn't wear592VVwear makeup593NNmakeup was594VBDbe reachable595JJreachable under596INunder Title597NPTitle VII598NPVII .599SENT. If600INif you601PPyou had602VHDhave asked603VVNask members604NNSmember of605INof Congress606NPCongress then607RBthen what608WPwhat they609PPthey had610VHDhave thought611VVNthink ,612,, they613PPthey would614MDwould not615RBnot have616VHhave been617VBNbe thinking618VVGthink about619INabout women620NNSwoman like621INlike Ann622NPAnn Hopkins623NPHopkins .624SENT. They625PPthey ...626:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]627LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] How628WRBHow do629VVPdo you630PPyou ...631:... do632VVPdo you633PPyou agree634VVPagree or635CCor disagree636VVPdisagree with637INwith Judge638NPJudge Posner639NPPosner 's640POS's statement641NNstatement that642IN/thatthat the643DTthe statute644NNstatute should645MDshould be646VBbe read647VVNread to648TOto encompass649VVencompass sexual650JJsexual orientation651NNorientation discrimination652NNdiscrimination to653TOto "654``" avoid655VVavoid placing656VVGplace the657DTthe entire658JJentire burden659NNburden of660INof updating661VVGupdate old662JJold statutes663NNSstatute on664INon the665DTthe legislative666JJlegislative branch667NNbranch "668''" ?669SENT? [MS. KARLAN]670LOC[MS. KARLAN] I671PPI disagree672VVPdisagree with673INwith Judge674NPJudge Posner675NPPosner .676SENT. I677PPI do678VVPdo n't679RBn't think680VVthink you681PPyou need682VVPneed to683TOto do684VVdo any685DTany updating686VVGupdate here687RBhere .688SENT. I689PPI think690VVPthink you691PPyou should692MDshould read693VVread the694DTthe words695NNSword as696INas they697PPthey were698VBDbe understood699VVNunderstand then700RBthen ,701,, which702WDTwhich is703VBZbe men704NNSman and705CCand women706NNSwoman .707SENT. Title708NPTitle VII709NPVII was710VBDbe intended711VVNintend to712TOto make713VVmake sure714JJsure that715IN/thatthat men716NNSman were717VBDbe not718RBnot disadvantaged719VVNdisadvantage relative720JJrelative to721TOto women722NNSwoman and723CCand women724NNSwoman were725VBDbe not726RBnot disadvantaged727VVNdisadvantage relative728JJrelative to729TOto men730NNSman .731SENT. And732CCand when733WRBwhen you734PPyou tell735VVPtell two736CDtwo employees737NNSemployee who738WPwho come739VVPcome in740INin ,741,, both742CCboth of743INof whom744WPwhom tell745VVPtell you746PPyou they747PPthey married748VVDmarry their749PP$their partner750NNpartner Bill751NPBill last752JJlast weekend753NNweekend ,754,, when755WRBwhen you756PPyou fire757VVfire the758DTthe male759JJmale employee760NNemployee who761WPwho married762VVDmarry Bill763NPBill and764CCand you765PPyou give766VVPgive the767DTthe female768JJfemale employee769NNemployee who770WPwho married771VVDmarry Bill772NPBill a773DTa couple774NNcouple of775INof days776NNSday off777INoff so778RBso she779PPshe can780MDcan celebrate781VVcelebrate the782DTthe joyous783JJjoyous event784NNevent ,785,, that786WDTthat 's787VBZbe discrimination788NNdiscrimination because789INbecause of790INof sex791NNsex .792SENT. Well793UHwell ,794,, if795INif no796DTno one797CDone has798VHZhave any799DTany further800JJRfurther questions801NNSquestion ,802,, I803PPI 'll804MDwill reserve805VVreserve the806DTthe remainder807NNremainder of808INof my809PP$my time810NNtime for811INfor rebuttal812NNrebuttal .813SENT. [814SYM[ LAUGHTER815NNlaughter ]816SYM] [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]817LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well818UHwell ,819,, I820PPI think821VVPthink we822PPwe 'll823MDwill have824VHhave further825JJRfurther questions826NNSquestion .827SENT. [828SYM[ LAUGHTER829NNlaughter ]830SYM] [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]831LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] What832WPWhat do833VVPdo you834PPyou do835VVPdo with836INwith the837DTthe argument838NNargument that839IN/thatthat this840DTthis is841VBZbe a842DTa non-discriminatory843JJnon-discriminatory policy844NNpolicy because845INbecause it846PPit applies847VVZapply equally848RBequally to849TOto relationships850NNSrelationship between851INbetween women852NNSwoman and853CCand relationships854NNSrelationship between855INbetween men856NNSman ?857SENT? In858INin other859JJother words860NNSword ,861,, your862PP$your friends863NNSfriend on864INon the865DTthe ...866:... or867CCor ...868:... or869CCor you870PPyou emphasize871VVPemphasize that872IN/thatthat you873PPyou need874VVPneed to875TOto know876VVknow the877DTthe sex878NNsex of879INof the880DTthe individuals881NNSindividual involved882VVNinvolve before883INbefore you884PPyou can885MDcan determine886VVdetermine whether887INwhether or888CCor not889RBnot there890EXthere 's891VBZbe a892DTa violation893NNviolation and894CCand that895DTthat that896WDTthat brings897VVZbring it898PPit within899INwithin Title900NPTitle VII901NPVII .902SENT. But903CCbut what904WPwhat about905INabout the906DTthe response907NNresponse that908IN/thatthat you909PPyou do910VVPdo not911RBnot need912VVneed to913TOto know914VVknow the915DTthe sex916NNsex of917INof the918DTthe people919NNSpeople involved920VVNinvolve ;921:; you922PPyou just923RBjust can924MDcan have925VHhave a926DTa policy927NNpolicy against928INagainst same929JJsame sex930NNsex ?931SENT? So932RBso you933PPyou do934VVPdo n't935RBn't care936VVcare whether937INwhether the938DTthe participants939NNSparticipant are940VBPbe women941NNSwoman or942CCor men943NNSman .944SENT. If945INif they946PPthey 're947VBPbe the948DTthe same949JJsame ,950,, then951RBthen that952DTthat 's953VBZbe covered954VVNcover by955INby the956DTthe policy957NNpolicy .958SENT. [MS. KARLAN]959LOC[MS. KARLAN] I960PPI think961VVPthink that962WDTthat 's963VBZbe no964RBno different965JJdifferent than966INthan having967VHGhave a968DTa policy969NNpolicy that970WDTthat says971VVZsay everyone972NNeveryone should973MDshould comply974VVcomply with975INwith the976DTthe stereotype977NNstereotype applicable978JJapplicable to979TOto their980PP$their sex981NNsex .982SENT. And983CCand if984INif I985PPI can986MDcan use987VVuse an988DTan example989NNexample from990INfrom the991DTthe Court992NPCourt 's993POS's prior994JJprior cases995NNScase ,996,, for997INfor example998NNexample ,999,, in1000INin Dothard1001NPDothard against1002INagainst Rawlinson1003NPRawlinson ,1004,, the1005DTthe policy1006NNpolicy on1007INon its1008PP$its face1009NNface said1010VVDsay you1011PPyou cannot1012MDcan guard1013VVguard someone1014NNsomeone of1015INof the1016DTthe opposite1017JJopposite sex1018NNsex .1019SENT. So1020INso a1021DTa woman1022NNwoman who1023WPwho seeks1024VVZseek to1025TOto guard1026VVguard a1027DTa man1028NNman is1029VBZbe barred1030VVNbar from1031INfrom that1032DTthat job1033NNjob ;1034:; a1035DTa man1036NNman who1037WPwho seeks1038VVZseek to1039TOto guard1040VVguard a1041DTa woman1042NNwoman is1043VBZbe barred1044VVNbar from1045INfrom that1046DTthat job1047NNjob .1048SENT. Just1049RBjust put1050VVNput in1051INin ,1052,, instead1053RBinstead of1054INof the1055DTthe word1056NNword "1057``" guard1058NNguard ,1059,, "1060''" "1061``" date1062NNdate "1063''" and1064CCand you1065PPyou get1066VVPget the1067DTthe same1068JJsame kind1069NNkind of1070INof rule1071NNrule here1072RBhere ,1073,, which1074WDTwhich is1075VBZbe a1076DTa man1077NNman who1078WPwho wants1079VVZwant to1080TOto date1081VVdate a1082DTa man1083NNman can1084MDcan 't1085RB't do1086VVdo it1087PPit but1088CCbut a1089DTa woman1090NNwoman can1091MDcan ,1092,, and1093CCand a1094DTa woman1095NNwoman who1096WPwho wants1097VVZwant to1098TOto date1099VVdate a1100DTa woman1101NNwoman can1102MDcan 't1103RB't do1104VVdo it1105PPit ...1106:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]1107LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But1108CCbut there1109EXthere 's1110VBZbe ,1111,, Ms1112NNMs ...1113:... .1114SENT. [MS. KARLAN]1115LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...1116:... but1117CCbut a1118DTa man1119NNman can1120MDcan .1121SENT. They1122PPthey are1123VBPbe two1124CDtwo forms1125NNSform of1126INof discrimination1127NNdiscrimination .1128SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]1129LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Ms1130NNMs .1131SENT. Karlan1132NPKarlan ,1133,, there1134EXthere 's1135VBZbe quite1136RBquite a1137DTa difference1138NNdifference .1139SENT. In1140INin the1141DTthe Dothard1142NPDothard case1143NNcase ,1144,, it1145PPit was1146VBDbe the1147DTthe disparate1148JJdisparate impact1149NNimpact .1150SENT. There1151EXthere are1152VBPbe many1153JJmany more1154JJRmore male1155JJmale prisoners1156NNSprisoner to1157TOto guard1158VVguard than1159INthan females1160NNSfemale .1161SENT. So1162INso that1163DTthat policy1164NNpolicy ,1165,, even1166RBeven though1167INthough it1168PPit applied1169VVDapply to1170TOto men1171NNSman guarding1172VVGguard women1173NNSwoman ,1174,, it1175PPit had1176VHDhave a1177DTa disproportionate1178JJdisproportionate effect1179NNeffect on1180INon women1181NNSwoman who1182WPwho wanted1183VVDwant to1184TOto be1185VBbe guards1186NNSguard because1187INbecause there1188EXthere were1189VBDbe many1190JJmany more1191JJRmore jobs1192NNSjob guarding1193VVGguard male1194JJmale prisoners1195NNSprisoner than1196INthan female1197JJfemale prisoners1198NNSprisoner .1199SENT. [MS. KARLAN]1200LOC[MS. KARLAN] Justice1201NPJustice Ginsburg1202NPGinsburg ,1203,, the1204DTthe part1205NNpart of1206INof Dothard1207NPDothard against1208INagainst Rawlinson1209NPRawlinson that1210WDTthat rested1211VVDrest on1212INon disparate1213JJdisparate impact1214NNimpact was1215VBDbe the1216DTthe height1217NNheight and1218CCand weight1219NNweight requirements1220NNSrequirement .1221SENT. The1222DTthe requirement1223NNrequirement about1224INabout guarding1225VVGguard the1226DTthe opposite1227JJopposite sex1228NNsex was1229VBDbe not1230RBnot a1231DTa disparate1232JJdisparate impact1233NNimpact .1234SENT. At1235INat most1236JJSmost ,1237,, the1238DTthe Court1239NPCourt noted1240VVDnote in1241INin a1242DTa footnote1243NNfootnote along1244INalong the1245DTthe way1246NNway that1247IN/thatthat there1248EXthere were1249VBDbe more1250JJRmore guard1251NNguard positions1252NNSposition available1253JJavailable to1254TOto men1255NNSman ,1256,, but1257CCbut it1258PPit was1259VBDbe not1260RBnot a1261DTa disparate1262JJdisparate impact1263NNimpact case1264NNcase .1265SENT. It1266PPit was1267VBDbe a1268DTa disparate1269JJdisparate treatment1270NNtreatment case1271NNcase .1272SENT. And1273CCand so1274RBso a1275DTa male1276JJmale person1277NNperson who1278WPwho had1279VHDhave wanted1280VVNwant to1281TOto guard1282VVguard someone1283NNsomeone at1284INat the1285DTthe Julia1286NPJulia Tutwiler1287NPTutwiler prison1288NNprison ,1289,, the1290DTthe prison1291NNprison for1292INfor women1293NNSwoman in1294INin Alabama1295NPAlabama ,1296,, would1297MDwould have1298VHhave had1299VHNhave a1300DTa claim1301NNclaim that1302IN/thatthat he1303PPhe had1304VHDhave been1305VBNbe discriminated1306VVNdiscriminate against1307INagainst because1308INbecause of1309INof sex1310NNsex .1311SENT. Now1312RBnow ,1313,, he1314PPhe would1315MDwould have1316VHhave lost1317VVNlose that1318DTthat claim1319NNclaim but1320CCbut on1321INon BFOQ1322NPBFOQ grounds1323NNSground ,1324,, not1325RBnot on1326INon because1327INbecause of1328INof sex1329NNsex grounds1330NNSground .1331SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]1332LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] What1333WPWhat do1334VVPdo you1335PPyou do1336VVPdo with1337INwith the1338DTthe ...1339:... the1340DTthe example1341NNexample that1342WDTthat was1343VBDbe brought1344VVNbring up1345RPup that1346IN/thatthat ,1347,, unlike1348INunlike race1349NNrace ,1350,, there1351EXthere are1352VBPbe certain1353JJcertain distinctions1354NNSdistinction that1355WDTthat are1356VBPbe not1357RBnot only1358RBonly permitted1359VVNpermit but1360CCbut maybe1361RBmaybe even1362RBeven required1363VVNrequire between1364INbetween males1365NNSmale and1366CCand females1367NNSfemale ,1368,, like1369INlike physical1370JJphysical fitness1371NNfitness tests1372NNStest ?1373SENT? [MS. KARLAN]1374LOC[MS. KARLAN] So1375INso those1376DTthose ...1377:... I1378PPI want1379VVPwant to1380TOto answer1381VVanswer that1382DTthat question1383NNquestion in1384INin two1385CDtwo parts1386NNSpart .1387SENT. The1388DTthe first1389JJfirst is1390VBZbe to1391TOto notice1392VVnotice that1393IN/thatthat in1394INin those1395DTthose cases1396NNScase ,1397,, there1398EXthere is1399VBZbe no1400DTno question1401NNquestion there1402EXthere 's1403VBZbe a1404DTa differential1405NNdifferential between1406INbetween men1407NNSman and1408CCand women1409NNSwoman ;1410:; that1411WDTthat is1412VBZbe ,1413,, men1414NNSman and1415CCand women1416NNSwoman are1417VBPbe being1418VBGbe treated1419VVNtreat differently1420RBdifferently .1421SENT. What1422WPWhat is1423VBZbe at1424INat issue1425NNissue there1426EXthere is1427VBZbe whether1428INwhether that1429DTthat differential1430JJdifferential treatment1431NNtreatment constitutes1432VVZconstitute unlawful1433JJunlawful discrimination1434NNdiscrimination under1435INunder Title1436NPTitle VII1437NPVII .1438SENT. So1439RBso ,1440,, for1441INfor example1442NNexample ,1443,, in1444INin Johnson1445NPJohnson against1446INagainst Santa1447NPSanta Clara1448NPClara County1449NPCounty Transportation1450NPTransportation Agency1451NPAgency ,1452,, everyone1453NNeveryone recognized1454VVDrecognize Paul1455NPPaul Johnson1456NPJohnson was1457VBDbe denied1458VVNdeny the1459DTthe job1460NNjob because1461INbecause of1462INof his1463PP$his sex1464NNsex ,1465,, but1466CCbut because1467INbecause it1468PPit was1469VBDbe a1470DTa permissible1471JJpermissible affirmative1472JJaffirmative action1473NNaction program1474NNprogram ,1475,, that1476WDTthat was1477VBDbe okay1478JJokay .1479SENT. In1480INin Dothard1481NPDothard against1482INagainst Rawlinson1483NPRawlinson ,1484,, this1485DTthis Court1486NPCourt said1487VVDsay Ms1488NNMs .1489SENT. Rawlinson1490NPRawlinson is1491VBZbe discriminated1492VVNdiscriminate against1493INagainst because1494INbecause of1495INof sex1496NNsex ,1497,, but1498CCbut there1499EXthere 's1500VBZbe a1501DTa BFOQ1502NPBFOQ .1503SENT. So1504RBso if1505INif Congress1506NPCongress writes1507VVZwrite an1508DTan exemption1509NNexemption into1510INinto the1511DTthe statute1512NNstatute ,1513,, that1514WDTthat 's1515VBZbe one1516CDone thing1517NNthing .1518SENT. But1519CCbut this1520DTthis Court1521NPCourt really1522RBreally should1523MDshould n't1524RBn't be1525VBbe writing1526VVGwrite in1527INin an1528DTan exemption1529NNexemption for1530INfor those1531DTthose purposes1532NNSpurpose .1533SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1534LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Do1535VVPdo you1536PPyou think1537VVPthink we1538PPwe need1539VVPneed exemptions1540NNSexemption for1541INfor those1542DTthose BFOQs1543NPBFOQs ?1544SENT? It1545PPit 's1546VBZbe not1547RBnot just1548RBjust the1549DTthe ...1550:... physical1551JJphysical fitness1552NNfitness standards1553NNSstandard for1554INfor different1555JJdifferent sports1556NNSsport ,1557,, but1558CCbut big1559JJbig issue1560NNissue right1561RBright now1562RBnow raging1563VVGrage the1564DTthe country1565NNcountry is1566VBZbe bathroom1567NNbathroom usage1568NNusage .1569SENT. Same-sex1570NPSame-sex bathroom1571NNbathroom usage1572NNusage .1573SENT. How1574WRBHow are1575VBPbe those1576DTthose cases1577NNScase going1578VVGgo to1579TOto be1580VBbe dealt1581VVNdeal with1582INwith absent1583JJabsent a1584DTa congressional1585JJcongressional exemption1586NNexemption other1587JJother than1588INthan BFOQ1589NPBFOQ ?1590SENT? [MS. KARLAN]1591LOC[MS. KARLAN] Well1592UHwell ,1593,, I1594PPI think1595VVPthink the1596DTthe way1597NNway that1598IN/thatthat they1599PPthey get1600VVPget dealt1601VVNdeal with1602INwith is1603VBZbe everybody1604NNeverybody agrees1605VVZagree if1606INif you1607PPyou have1608VHPhave men1609NNSman 's1610POS's bathrooms1611NNSbathroom and1612CCand women1613NNSwoman 's1614POS's bathrooms1615NNSbathroom ,1616,, that1617WDTthat 's1618VBZbe because1619INbecause of1620INof sex1621NNsex .1622SENT. It1623PPit treats1624VVZtreat men1625NNSman one1626CDone way1627NNway ,1628,, it1629PPit says1630VVZsay go1631VVgo to1632TOto this1633DTthis bathroom1634NNbathroom .1635SENT. It1636PPit treats1637VVZtreat women1638NNSwoman another1639DTanother way1640NNway ,1641,, it1642PPit says1643VVZsay go1644VVgo to1645TOto this1646DTthis bathroom1647NNbathroom .1648SENT. Then1649RBthen the1650DTthe question1651NNquestion becomes1652VVZbecome is1653VBZbe that1654IN/thatthat permissible1655JJpermissible to1656TOto do1657VVdo ?1658SENT? And1659CCand if1660INif I1661PPI could1662MDcould just1663RBjust begin1664VVbegin with1665INwith an1666DTan example1667NNexample that1668IN/thatthat I1669PPI think1670VVPthink will1671MDwill show1672VVshow why1673WRBwhy this1674DTthis is1675VBZbe so1676RBso .1677SENT. When1678WRBwhen I1679PPI got1680VVDget up1681RPup ,1682,, the1683DTthe Chief1684NPChief Justice1685NPJustice said1686VVDsay to1687TOto me1688PPme ,1689,, "1690''" Ms1691NNMs .1692SENT. "1693''" Karlan1694NPKarlan ,1695,, I1696PPI am1697VBPbe willing1698JJwilling to1699TOto bet1700VVbet any1701DTany amount1702NNamount of1703INof money1704NNmoney I1705PPI have1706VHPhave that1707DTthat when1708WRBwhen Mr1709NPMr .1710SENT. Harris1711NPHarris gets1712VVZget up1713RPup ,1714,, he1715PPhe is1716VBZbe going1717VVGgo to1718TOto say1719VVsay "1720``" Mr1721NPMr .1722SENT. "1723``" Harris1724NPHarris .1725SENT. He1726PPhe has1727VHZhave treated1728VVNtreat us1729PPus differently1730RBdifferently because1731INbecause of1732INof sex1733NNsex .1734SENT. But1735CCbut that1736DTthat 's1737VBZbe not1738RBnot discriminatory1739JJdiscriminatory because1740INbecause neither1741CCneither of1742INof us1743PPus has1744VHZhave been1745VBNbe subjected1746VVNsubject to1747TOto a1748DTa disadvantage1749NNdisadvantage .1750SENT. And1751CCand as1752INas this1753DTthis Court1754NPCourt said1755VVDsay in1756INin Burlington1757NPBurlington White1758NPWhite against1759INagainst North1760NPNorth ...1761:... Burlington1762NPBurlington Northern1763NPNorthern against1764INagainst White1765NPWhite ,1766,, what1767WPwhat the1768DTthe statute1769NNstatute means1770VVZmean when1771WRBwhen it1772PPit says1773VVZsay "1774``" discriminate1775JJdiscriminate against1776INagainst "1777``" is1778VBZbe to1779TOto cause1780VVcause an1781DTan injury1782NNinjury and1783CCand requiring1784VVGrequire people1785NNSpeople generally1786RBgenerally to1787TOto use1788VVuse separate1789JJseparate bathrooms1790NNSbathroom is1791VBZbe not1792RBnot an1793DTan injury1794NNinjury .1795SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1796LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well1797UHWell ,1798,, I'm1799NPI'm ...1800:... I1801PPI 'm1802VBPbe not1803RBnot sure1804JJsure that1805IN/thatthat maybe1806RBmaybe how1807WRBhow they1808PPthey would1809MDwould see1810VVsee it1811PPit .1812SENT. And1813CCand to1814TOto what1815WPwhat ...1816:... to1817TOto what1818WPwhat extent1819NNextent should1820MDshould we1821PPwe take1822VVtake that1823IN/thatthat into1824INinto account1825NNaccount ?1826SENT? And1827CCand same1828JJsame thing1829NNthing with1830INwith a1831DTa gender-specific1832JJgender-specific uniform1833NNuniform requirements1834NNSrequirement .1835SENT. [MS. KARLAN]1836LOC[MS. KARLAN] Sure1837NPSure .1838SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1839LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] How1840WRBHow would1841MDwould you1842PPyou deal1843VVdeal with1844INwith those1845DTthose ,1846,, given1847VVNgive that1848DTthat ...1849:... that1850IN/thatthat at1851INat least1852JJSleast those1853DTthose affected1854VVNaffect might1855MDmight think1856VVthink that1857IN/thatthat they1858PPthey 're1859VBPbe suffering1860VVGsuffer a1861DTa harm1862NNharm ?1863SENT? [MS. KARLAN]1864LOC[MS. KARLAN] So1865INso there1866EXthere 's1867VBZbe no1868DTno categorical1869JJcategorical rule1870NNrule about1871INabout these1872DTthese .1873SENT. For1874INfor example1875NNexample ,1876,, the1877DTthe fact1878NNfact that1879IN/thatthat all1880DTall of1881INof the1882DTthe men1883NNSman sitting1884VVGsit at1885INat counsel1886NNcounsel table1887NNtable knew1888VVDknow that1889IN/thatthat they1890PPthey had1891VHDhave to1892TOto wear1893VVwear ties1894NNSty today1895NNtoday and1896CCand I1897PPI was1898VBDbe free1899JJfree not1900RBnot to1901TOto did1902VVDdo n't1903RBn't cause1904VVcause an1905DTan injury1906NNinjury .1907SENT. On1908INon the1909DTthe other1910JJother hand1911NNhand ,1912,, even1913RBeven the1914DTthe dissenters1915NNSdissenter in1916INin the1917DTthe Second1918NPSecond Circuit1919NPCircuit said1920VVDsay ,1921,, if1922INif the1923DTthe Court1924NPCourt said1925VVDsay women1926NNSwoman who1927WPwho come1928VVPcome to1929TOto argue1930VVargue should1931MDshould argue1932VVargue in1933INin Hooters1934NNShooter outfits1935NNSoutfit and1936CCand the1937DTthe men1938NNSman should1939MDshould wear1940VVwear ...1941:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1942LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] No1943NPNo ...1944:... [MS. KARLAN]1945LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...1946:... ties1947NNSty ...1948:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1949LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...1950:... we1951PPwe 're1952VBPbe not1953RBnot ...1954:... we1955PPwe 're1956VBPbe not1957RBnot ...1958:... I1959PPI mean1960VVPmean ...1961:... [MS. KARLAN]1962LOC[MS. KARLAN] I1963PPI know1964VVPknow .1965SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1966LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...1967:... we1968PPwe can1969MDcan talk1970VVtalk absurd1971JJabsurd examples1972NNSexample ...1973:... [MS. KARLAN]1974LOC[MS. KARLAN] No1975NPNo ,1976,, but1977CCbut I1978PPI can1979MDcan ...1980:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]1981LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...1982:... or1983CCor we1984PPwe can1985MDcan talk1986VVtalk real1987JJreal world1988NNworld examples1989NNSexample .1990SENT. [MS. KARLAN]1991LOC[MS. KARLAN] I1992PPI will1993MDwill give1994VVgive you1995PPyou a1996DTa real1997JJreal world1998NNworld example1999NNexample ,2000,, which2001WDTwhich is2002VBZbe ,2003,, it2004PPit probably2005RBprobably does2006VVZdo n't2007RBn't violate2008VVviolate dress2009NNdress code2010NNcode to2011TOto require2012VVrequire men2013NNSman and2014CCand women2015NNSwoman in2016INin business2017NNbusiness events2018NNSevent for2019INfor the2020DTthe women2021NNSwoman to2022TOto wear2023VVwear skirts2024NNSskirt ,2025,, but2026CCbut if2027INif you2028PPyou required2029VVDrequire a2030DTa telephone2031NNtelephone lineman2032NNlineman to2033TOto wear2034VVwear a2035DTa skirt2036NNskirt ...2037:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2038LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] No2039NPNo ,2040,, no2041RBno ...2042:... [MS. KARLAN]2043LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...2044:... while2045INwhile she2046PPshe 's2047VBZbe still2048RBstill ...2049:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2050LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I2051PPI understand2052VVPunderstand that2053RBthat .2054SENT. That2055DTthat 's2056VBZbe not2057RBnot what2058WPwhat I2059PPI 'm2060VBPbe getting2061VVGget at2062INat .2063SENT. And2064CCand you2065PPyou know2066VVPknow what2067WPwhat I2068PPI 'm2069VBPbe getting2070VVGget at2071INat .2072SENT. The2073DTthe funeral2074JJfuneral homes2075NNShome example2076NNexample 's2077VBZbe not2078RBnot a2079DTa bad2080JJbad ...2081:... the2082DTthe case2083NNcase that2084IN/thatthat we2085PPwe 're2086VBPbe about2087RBabout to2088TOto take2089VVtake up2090RPup is2091VBZbe ...2092:... is2093VBZbe ...2094:... is2095VBZbe more2096JJRmore in2097INin the2098DTthe ...2099:... in2100INin the2101DTthe realm2102NNrealm of2103INof my2104PP$my question2105NNquestion .2106SENT. [MS. KARLAN]2107LOC[MS. KARLAN] Okay2108NPOkay .2109SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2110LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] You2111PPyou can2112MDcan offer2113VVoffer me2114PPme help2115VVhelp if2116INif you2117PPyou want2118VVPwant to2119TOto .2120SENT. [MS. KARLAN]2121LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yes2122UHyes ,2123,, yes2124UHyes .2125SENT. No2126UHNo ,2127,, I2128PPI 'm2129VBPbe trying2130VVGtry to2131TOto offer2132VVoffer you2133PPyou help2134VVhelp .2135SENT. What2136WPWhat I2137PPI 'm2138VBPbe trying2139VVGtry to2140TOto say2141VVsay ...2142:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2143LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] All2144DTall right2145NNright .2146SENT. What2147WPWhat I'm2148NPI'm ...2149:... what2150WPwhat I2151PPI 'm2152VBPbe suggesting2153VVGsuggest ,2154,, counsel2155NNcounsel ,2156,, is2157VBZbe that2158IN/thatthat there2159EXthere are2160VBPbe male2161JJmale and2162CCand female2163JJfemale bathrooms2164NNSbathroom ,2165,, there2166EXthere are2167VBPbe dress2168NNdress codes2169NNScode that2170WDTthat are2171VBPbe otherwise2172RBotherwise innocuous2173JJinnocuous ,2174,, right2175RBright ,2176,, most2177JJSmost ...2178:... most2179JJSmost people2180NNSpeople would2181MDwould find2182VVfind them2183PPthem innocuous2184JJinnocuous .2185SENT. But2186CCbut the2187DTthe affected2188JJaffected communities2189NNScommunity will2190MDwill not2191RBnot .2192SENT. And2193CCand they2194PPthey will2195MDwill find2196VVfind harm2197NNharm .2198SENT. And2199CCand how2200WRBhow does2201VVZdo your2202PP$your test2203NNtest deal2204NNdeal with2205INwith that2206DTthat one2207CDone way2208NNway or2209CCor the2210DTthe other2211JJother ?2212SENT? That2213DTthat 's2214VBZbe what2215WPwhat I2216PPI 'm2217VBPbe asking2218VVGask you2219PPyou to2220TOto address2221VVaddress ,2222,, if2223INif you2224PPyou 'd2225MDwould like2226VVlike to2227TOto .2228SENT. [MS. KARLAN]2229LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yes2230NPYes .2231SENT. My2232PP$my test2233NNtest says2234VVZsay that2235IN/thatthat you2236PPyou have2237VHPhave treated2238VVNtreat the2239DTthe people2240NNSpeople differently2241RBdifferently because2242INbecause of2243INof sex2244NNsex ,2245,, which2246WDTwhich is2247VBZbe what2248WPwhat we2249PPwe are2250VBPbe asking2251VVGask you2252PPyou to2253TOto hold2254VVhold here2255RBhere .2256SENT. When2257WRBwhen you2258PPyou treat2259VVPtreat a2260DTa gay2261JJgay man2262NNman who2263WPwho wants2264VVZwant to2265TOto date2266VVdate a2267DTa woman2268NNwoman differently2269RBdifferently than2270INthan a2271DTa man2272NNman ...2273:... woman2274NNwoman who2275WPwho wants2276VVZwant to2277TOto date2278VVdate a2279DTa woman2280NNwoman ,2281,, that2282WDTthat ...2283:... that2284WDTthat 's2285VBZbe discrimination2286NNdiscrimination .2287SENT. Then2288RBthen you2289PPyou get2290VVPget to2291TOto what2292WPwhat I2293PPI 've2294VHPhave said2295VVNsay ,2296,, which2297WDTwhich is2298VBZbe you2299PPyou have2300VHPhave to2301TOto ask2302VVask whether2303INwhether a2304DTa reasonable2305JJreasonable person2306NNperson under2307INunder these2308DTthese circumstances2309NNScircumstance would2310MDwould be2311VBbe injured2312VVNinjure by2313INby the2314DTthe imposition2315NNimposition of2316INof the2317DTthe particular2318JJparticular sex-specific2319JJsex-specific world2320NNworld .2321SENT. So2322RBso when2323WRBwhen the2324DTthe Chief2325NPChief Justice2326NPJustice calls2327VVZcall me2328PPme Ms2329NNMs .2330SENT. ,2331,, I2332PPI am2333VBPbe not2334RBnot injured2335VVNinjure .2336SENT. When2337WRBwhen I2338PPI go2339VVPgo to2340TOto a2341DTa ...2342:... when2343WRBwhen I2344PPI ...2345:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2346LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] You2347PPyou are2348VBPbe not2349RBnot ,2350,, but2351CCbut another2352DTanother ...2353:... [MS. KARLAN]2354LOC[MS. KARLAN] It2355PPit ...2356:... it2357PPit ...2358:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2359LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...2360:... person2361NNperson might2362MDmight be2363VBbe .2364SENT. [MS. KARLAN]2365LOC[MS. KARLAN] Right2366RBright .2367SENT. And2368CCand the2369DTthe question2370NNquestion ...2371:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2372LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Are2373VBPbe they2374PPthey reasonable2375JJreasonable or2376CCor not2377RBnot ?2378SENT? And2379CCand ...2380:... and2381CCand I'm2382NPI'm ...2383:... I'm2384NNI'm ...2385:... I2386PPI 'm2387VBPbe just2388RBjust ...2389:... I2390PPI 'm2391VBPbe wondering2392VVGwonder ,2393,, how2394WRBhow do2395VVPdo you2396PPyou decide2397VVdecide those2398DTthose cases2399NNScase ?2400SENT? [MS. KARLAN]2401LOC[MS. KARLAN] An2402DTan idiosyncratic2403JJidiosyncratic preference2404NNpreference does2405VVZdo not2406RBnot void2407VVvoid an2408DTan otherwise2409RBotherwise valid2410JJvalid dress2411NNdress code2412NNcode or2413CCor bathroom2414NNbathroom rule2415NNrule .2416SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2417LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] So2418RBso is2419VBZbe it2420PPit ...2421:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2422LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Ms2423NNMs .2424SENT. Karlan2425NPKarlan ...2426:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2427LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I2428PPI 'm2429VBPbe sorry2430JJsorry .2431SENT. I2432PPI ...2433:... I2434PPI ...2435:... I2436PPI ...2437:... and2438CCand I2439PPI apologize2440VVPapologize .2441SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2442LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Go2443NPGo ahead2444RBahead and2445CCand finish2446VVfinish it2447PPit .2448SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2449LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Is2450VBZbe it2451PPit idiosyncratic2452JJidiosyncratic for2453INfor a2454DTa transgender2455NNtransgender person2456NNperson to2457TOto prefer2458VVprefer a2459DTa bathroom2460NNbathroom that2461WDTthat 's2462VBZbe different2463JJdifferent than2464INthan the2465DTthe ...2466:... the2467DTthe one2468CDone of2469INof their2470PP$their biological2471JJbiological sex2472NNsex ?2473SENT? Is2474VBZbe it2475PPit idiosyncratic2476JJidiosyncratic for2477INfor a2478DTa transsexual2479NNtranssexual person2480NNperson to2481TOto wish2482VVwish to2483TOto dress2484VVdress in2485INin a2486DTa different2487JJdifferent style2488NNstyle of2489INof dress2490NNdress than2491INthan his2492PP$his or2493CCor her2494PP$her biological2495NNbiological ...2496:... [MS. KARLAN]2497LOC[MS. KARLAN] No2498NPNo .2499SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]2500LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Sex2501NNsex ?2502SENT? Okay2503JJokay .2504SENT. So2505INso the2506DTthe answer2507NNanswer to2508TOto your2509PP$your question2510NNquestion is2511VBZbe ...2512:... the2513DTthe question2514NNquestion then2515RBthen ,2516,, at2517INat the2518DTthe end2519NNend of2520INof the2521DTthe day2522NNday ,2523,, if2524INif I2525PPI understand2526VVPunderstand it2527PPit ,2528,, is2529VBZbe that2530IN/thatthat those2531DTthose are2532VBPbe acts2533NNSact of2534INof discrimination2535NNdiscrimination under2536INunder Title2537NPTitle VII2538NPVII as2539INas you2540PPyou understand2541VVPunderstand it2542PPit ?2543SENT? [MS. KARLAN]2544LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yes2545NPYes ,2546,, although2547INalthough I2548PPI think2549VVPthink you'd2550NNyou'd ...2551:... you2552PPyou 'd2553MDwould be2554VBbe better2555RBRwell advised2556VVNadvise to2557TOto ask2558VVask the2559DTthe question2560NNquestion to2561TOto someone2562NNsomeone who2563WPwho ...2564:... who2565WPwho is2566VBZbe representing2567VVGrepresent someone2568NNsomeone who2569WPwho is2570VBZbe transgender2571NNtransgender .2572SENT. I2573PPI am2574VBPbe representing2575VVGrepresent someone2576NNsomeone who2577WPwho is2578VBZbe gay2579JJgay .2580SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2581LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Ms2582NNMs .2583SENT. Karlan2584NPKarlan .2585SENT. [MS. KARLAN]2586LOC[MS. KARLAN] And2587CCand ...2588:... yeah2589RByeah .2590SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2591LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But2592CCbut you2593PPyou 're2594VBPbe begging2595VVGbeg Justice2596NPJustice Gorsuch2597NPGorsuch 's2598POS's question2599NNquestion .2600SENT. We2601PPwe were2602VBDbe following2603VVGfollow up2604RPup on2605INon the2606DTthe same2607JJsame thing2608NNthing ...2609:... [MS. KARLAN]2610LOC[MS. KARLAN] I2611PPI truly2612RBtruly am2613VBPbe not2614RBnot trying2615VVGtry to2616TOto ...2617:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2618LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...2619:... which2620WDTwhich is2621VBZbe ...2622:... [MS. KARLAN]2623LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...2624:... beg2625VVbeg the2626DTthe question2627NNquestion .2628SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2629LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...2630:... how2631WRBhow do2632VVPdo we2633PPwe differentiate2634VVdifferentiate the2635DTthe two2636CDtwo ?2637SENT? What2638WPWhat is2639VBZbe the2640DTthe legal2641JJlegal test2642NNtest that2643IN/thatthat you2644PPyou propose2645VVPpropose to2646TOto say2647VVsay this2648DTthis is2649VBZbe discrimination2650NNdiscrimination because2651INbecause of2652INof sex2653NNsex ,2654,, as2655INas you2656PPyou said2657VVDsay ,2658,, calling2659VVGcall you2660PPyou one2661CDone thing2662NNthing and2663CCand your2664PP$your friend2665NNfriend another2666DTanother is2667VBZbe discriminatory2668JJdiscriminatory ,2669,, but2670CCbut it2671PPit 's2672VBZbe okay2673JJokay because2674INbecause there2675EXthere 's2676VBZbe no2677DTno harm2678NNharm .2679SENT. So2680RBso what2681WPwhat 's2682VBZbe the2683DTthe test2684NNtest we2685PPwe apply2686VVPapply to2687TOto ,2688,, say2689VVsay ,2690,, when2691WRBwhen it2692PPit is2693VBZbe harm2694NNharm and2695CCand when2696WRBwhen it2697PPit is2698VBZbe n't2699RBn't ?2700SENT? [MS. KARLAN]2701LOC[MS. KARLAN] Let2702VVlet ...2703:... let2704VVlet me2705PPme try2706VVtry to2707TOto be2708VBbe clear2709JJclear .2710SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2711LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Let2712NPLet 's2713POS's be2714VBbe ...2715:... [MS. KARLAN]2716LOC[MS. KARLAN] It2717PPit 's2718VBZbe not2719RBnot discrimination2720NNdiscrimination to2721TOto call2722VVcall me2723PPme Ms2724NNMs .2725SENT. Karlan2726NPKarlan and2727CCand to2728TOto call2729VVcall Mr2730NPMr .2731SENT. Harris2732NPHarris ,2733,, Mr2734NPMr .2735SENT. Harris2736NPHarris .2737SENT. It2738PPit is2739VBZbe ...2740:... it2741PPit is2742VBZbe because2743INbecause of2744INof sex2745NNsex that2746IN/thatthat we2747PPwe were2748VBDbe treated2749VVNtreat differently2750RBdifferently .2751SENT. But2752CCbut as2753INas this2754DTthis Court2755NPCourt has2756VHZhave made2757VVNmake it2758PPit clear2759JJclear several2760JJseveral times2761NNStime ,2762,, discrimination2763NNdiscrimination consists2764VVZconsist in2765INin an2766DTan injury2767NNinjury that2768IN/thatthat the2769DTthe law2770NNlaw is2771VBZbe prepared2772VVNprepare to2773TOto recognize2774VVrecognize .2775SENT. And2776CCand generally2777RBgenerally across2778INacross all2779DTall statutes2780NNSstatute ,2781,, this2782DTthis is2783VBZbe n't2784RBn't a2785DTa Title2786NPTitle VII2787NPVII ,2788,, and2789CCand this2790DTthis is2791VBZbe why2792WRBwhy I2793PPI 'm2794VBPbe really2795RBreally not2796RBnot begging2797VVGbeg the2798DTthe question2799NNquestion here2800RBhere ,2801,, the2802DTthe Court2803NPCourt has2804VHZhave said2805VVNsay de2806NPde minimis2807NPminimis effects2808NNSeffect are2809VBPbe exempted2810VVNexempt from2811INfrom statutes2812NNSstatute presumptively2813RBpresumptively .2814SENT. So2815RBso if2816INif this2817DTthis Court2818NPCourt thinks2819VVZthink or2820CCor if2821INif another2822DTanother court2823NNcourt ...2824:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2825LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So2826INso why2827NNwhy ...2828:... [MS. KARLAN]2829LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...2830:... thinks2831VVZthink ...2832:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2833LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...2834:... is2835VBZbe a2836DTa dress2837NNdress code2838NNcode for2839INfor Hooters2840NNShooter that2841WDTthat requires2842VVZrequire all2843DTall women2844NNSwoman to2845TOto wear2846VVwear a2847DTa scantily2848RBscantily ...2849:... a2850DTa scant2851JJscant dress2852NNdress ,2853,, is2854VBZbe that2855IN/thatthat discriminatory2856JJdiscriminatory ?2857SENT? [MS. KARLAN]2858LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yes2859NPYes ,2860,, it2861PPit is2862VBZbe .2863SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2864LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Is2865VBZbe it2866PPit discriminatory2867JJdiscriminatory for2868INfor the2869DTthe woman2870NNwoman who2871WPwho just2872RBjust does2873VVZdo n't2874RBn't want2875VVwant to2876TOto wear2877VVwear it2878PPit because2879INbecause it2880PPit 's2881VBZbe demeaning2882VVGdemean ?2883SENT? [MS. KARLAN]2884LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yes2885NPYes ,2886,, it2887PPit is2888VBZbe .2889SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2890LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So2891INso how2892WRBhow about2893RBabout ,2894,, is2895VBZbe it2896PPit discriminatory2897JJdiscriminatory for2898INfor the2899DTthe restaurant2900NNrestaurant not2901RBnot to2902TOto hire2903VVhire a2904DTa transgender2905NNtransgender man2906NNman who2907WPwho wants2908VVZwant to2909TOto wear2910VVwear the2911DTthe uniform2912NNuniform ?2913SENT? [MS. KARLAN]2914LOC[MS. KARLAN] Well2915UHwell ,2916,, you2917PPyou 're2918VBPbe going2919VVGgo to2920TOto get2921VVget ...2922:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2923LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] The2924DTthe scant2925JJscant uniform2926NNuniform .2927SENT. [MS. KARLAN]2928LOC[MS. KARLAN] I2929PPI ...2930:... I2931PPI mean2932VVPmean ,2933,, I2934PPI do2935VVPdo want2936VVwant to2937TOto get2938VVget to2939TOto the2940DTthe question2941NNquestion of2942INof sexual2943JJsexual orientation2944NNorientation ...2945:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2946LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] No2947UHNo ,2948,, no2949UHno ,2950,, no2951UHno ...2952:... [MS. KARLAN]2953LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...2954:... here2955RBhere ,2956,, but2957CCbut I2958PPI understand2959VVPunderstand ...2960:... I2961PPI understand2962VVPunderstand .2963SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2964LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But2965CCbut I2966PPI think2967VVPthink what2968WPwhat you2969PPyou 're2970VBPbe alluding2971VVGallude is2972VBZbe ,2973,, and2974CCand I2975PPI still2976RBstill have2977VHPhave n't2978RBn't heard2979VVNhear ...2980:... [MS. KARLAN]2981LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yeah2982NPYeah .2983SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2984LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...2985:... the2986DTthe explanation2987NNexplanation ,2988,, which2989WDTwhich is2990VBZbe the2991DTthe question2992NNquestion of2993INof how2994WRBhow do2995VVPdo we2996PPwe tell2997VVtell what2998WPwhat 's2999VBZbe actionable3000JJactionable and3001CCand not3002RBnot ?3003SENT? [MS. KARLAN]3004LOC[MS. KARLAN] Well3005UHWell ,3006,, if3007INif ...3008:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3009LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] At3010INat what3011WPwhat ...3012:... when3013WRBwhen does3014VVZdo that3015DTthat discrimination3016NNdiscrimination become3017VVbecome an3018DTan issue3019NNissue ?3020SENT? [MS. KARLAN]3021LOC[MS. KARLAN] I'll3022NPI'll ...3023:... I3024PPI 'll3025MDwill give3026VVgive an3027DTan analogy3028NNanalogy from3029INfrom the3030DTthe race3031NNrace area3032NNarea that3033WDTthat may3034MDmay be3035VBbe helpful3036JJhelpful to3037TOto the3038DTthe Court3039NPCourt ,3040,, which3041WDTwhich is3042VBZbe ,3043,, for3044INfor many3045JJmany years3046NNSyear ,3047,, there3048EXthere was3049VBDbe an3050DTan argument3051NNargument that3052IN/thatthat separate3053JJseparate but3054CCbut equal3055JJequal was3056VBDbe acceptable3057JJacceptable .3058SENT. And3059CCand ultimately3060RBultimately this3061DTthis Court3062NPCourt concluded3063VVDconclude that3064IN/thatthat when3065WRBwhen it3066PPit came3067VVDcome to3068TOto race3069NNrace ,3070,, separate3071JJseparate but3072CCbut equal3073JJequal was3074VBDbe not3075RBnot permissible3076JJpermissible .3077SENT. I3078PPI do3079VVPdo n't3080RBn't think3081VVthink the3082DTthe Court3083NPCourt has3084VHZhave held3085VVNhold anything3086NNanything like3087INlike that3088IN/thatthat with3089INwith regard3090NNregard to3091TOto sex3092NNsex ,3093,, but3094CCbut you3095PPyou 're3096VBPbe going3097VVGgo to3098TOto have3099VHhave to3100TOto answer3101VVanswer that3102DTthat question3103NNquestion about3104INabout dress3105NNdress codes3106NNScode regardless3107RBregardless of3108INof how3109WRBhow you3110PPyou rule3111VVPrule in3112INin either3113CCeither my3114PP$my case3115NNcase or3116CCor in3117INin Ms3118NNMs .3119SENT. Stephens3120NPStephens '3121POS' case3122NNcase because3123INbecause ...3124:... [JUSTICE ALITO]3125LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Can3126MDcan I3127PPI ask3128VVask ...3129:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]3130LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Would3131MDwould you3132PPyou say3133VVsay the3134DTthe test3135NNtest is3136VBZbe is3137VBZbe the3138DTthe person3139NNperson injured3140VVNinjure ?3141SENT? Yes3142UHyes ,3143,, it3144PPit 's3145VBZbe a3146DTa differential3147NNdifferential based3148VVNbase on3149INon gender3150NNgender ,3151,, but3152CCbut most3153JJSmost people3154NNSpeople are3155VBPbe not3156RBnot injured3157VVNinjure by3158INby having3159VHGhave separate3160JJseparate bathrooms3161NNSbathroom .3162SENT. In3163INin fact3164NNfact ,3165,, they3166PPthey ...3167:... most3168JJSmost people3169NNSpeople would3170MDwould prefer3171VVprefer it3172PPit .3173SENT. So3174RBso are3175VBPbe you3176PPyou saying3177VVGsay that3178IN/thatthat we3179PPwe have3180VHPhave to3181TOto wait3182VVwait for3183INfor the3184DTthe testing3185NNtesting case3186NNcase for3187INfor the3188DTthe person3189NNperson who3190WPwho might3191MDmight be3192VBbe injured3193VVNinjure by3194INby not3195RBnot being3196VBGbe allowed3197VVNallow to3198TOto use3199VVuse the3200DTthe bathroom3201NNbathroom of3202INof the3203DTthe other3204JJother sex3205NNsex ?3206SENT? [MS. KARLAN]3207LOC[MS. KARLAN] I3208PPI think3209VVPthink it3210PPit highly3211RBhighly unlikely3212JJunlikely you3213PPyou 're3214VBPbe going3215VVGgo to3216TOto see3217VVsee cases3218NNScase like3219INlike that3220DTthat .3221SENT. The3222DTthe bathroom3223NNbathroom issue3224NNissue has3225VHZhave been3226VBNbe around3227RBaround since3228INsince the3229DTthe beginning3230NNbeginning of3231INof Title3232NPTitle VII3233NPVII .3234SENT. Title3235NPTitle VII3236NPVII has3237VHZhave a3238DTa special3239JJspecial provision3240NNprovision in3241INin 7033242CD@card@ (3243(( a3244DTa )3245)) (3246(( ii3247NNii )3248)) that3249WDTthat says3250VVZsay ,3251,, when3252WRBwhen you3253PPyou segregate3254VVPsegregate people3255NNSpeople ,3256,, the3257DTthe question3258NNquestion is3259VBZbe whether3260INwhether that3261DTthat segregation3262NNsegregation denies3263VVZdeny them3264PPthem employment3265NNemployment opportunities3266NNSopportunity .3267SENT. And3268CCand it3269PPit is3270VBZbe hard3271JJhard to3272TOto see3273VVsee ,3274,, quite3275RBquite honestly3276RBhonestly ,3277,, how3278WRBhow requiring3279VVGrequire men3280NNSman to3281TOto use3282VVuse a3283DTa men3284NNSman 's3285POS's room3286NNroom and3287CCand women3288NNSwoman to3289TOto use3290VVuse a3291DTa women3292NNSwoman 's3293POS's room3294NNroom denies3295VVZdeny them3296PPthem employment3297NNemployment opportunities3298NNSopportunity .3299SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]3300LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] May3301MDmay I3302PPI ask3303VVask you3304PPyou to3305TOto ...3306:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3307LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Are3308VBPbe these3309DTthese ...3310:... Justice3311NPJustice Alito3312NPAlito .3313SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]3314LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] May3315MDmay I3316PPI ask3317VVask you3318PPyou to3319TOto respond3320VVrespond to3321TOto what3322WPwhat some3323DTsome people3324NNSpeople will3325MDwill say3326VVsay about3327INabout this3328DTthis Court3329NPCourt if3330INif we3331PPwe rule3332VVPrule in3333INin your3334PP$your favor3335NNfavor ?3336SENT? And3337CCand what3338WPwhat they3339PPthey will3340MDwill say3341VVsay is3342VBZbe that3343IN/thatthat whether3344INwhether Title3345NPTitle VII3346NPVII should3347MDshould prohibit3348VVprohibit discrimination3349NNdiscrimination on3350INon the3351DTthe basis3352NNbasis of3353INof sexual3354JJsexual orientation3355NNorientation is3356VBZbe a3357DTa big3358JJbig policy3359NNpolicy issue3360NNissue ,3361,, and3362CCand it3363PPit is3364VBZbe a3365DTa different3366JJdifferent policy3367NNpolicy issue3368NNissue from3369INfrom the3370DTthe one3371CDone that3372IN/thatthat Congress3373NPCongress thought3374VVDthink it3375PPit was3376VBDbe addressing3377VVGaddress 243378CD@card@ in3379INin 19643380CD@card@ .3381SENT. And3382CCand Congress3383NPCongress has3384VHZhave been3385VBNbe asked3386VVNask repeatedly3387RBrepeatedly in3388INin the3389DTthe years3390NNSyear since3391INsince 19643392CD@card@ to3393TOto address3394VVaddress this3395DTthis question3396NNquestion .3397SENT. The3398DTthe Equality3399NNequality Act3400NNact is3401VBZbe before3402INbefore Congress3403NPCongress right3404RBright now3405RBnow .3406SENT. Congress3407NPCongress has3408VHZhave declined3409VVNdecline or3410CCor failed3411VVNfail to3412TOto act3413VVact on3414INon these3415DTthese requests3416NNSrequest .3417SENT. And3418CCand if3419INif the3420DTthe Court3421NPCourt takes3422VVZtake this3423DTthis up3424RBup and3425CCand interprets3426VVZinterpret this3427DTthis 19643428CD@card@ statute3429NNstatute to3430TOto prohibit3431VVprohibit discrimination3432NNdiscrimination based3433VVNbase on3434INon sexual3435JJsexual orientation3436NNorientation ,3437,, we3438PPwe will3439MDwill be3440VBbe acting3441VVGact exactly3442RBexactly like3443INlike a3444DTa legislature3445NNlegislature .3446SENT. We3447PPwe might3448MDmight as3449RBas well3450RBwell just3451RBjust take3452VVtake the3453DTthe Equality3454NNequality Act3455NNact and3456CCand issue3457NNissue that3458IN/thatthat as3459INas our3460PP$our opinion3461NNopinion and3462CCand say3463VVsay ,3464,, as3465INas Judge3466NPJudge Posner3467NPPosner said3468VVDsay ,3469,, that3470IN/thatthat the3471DTthe courts3472NNScourt need3473VVPneed to3474TOto intervene3475VVintervene on3476INon questions3477NNSquestion like3478VVPlike this3479DTthis when3480WRBwhen the3481DTthe legislative3482JJlegislative branch3483NNbranch simply3484RBsimply will3485MDwill not3486RBnot do3487VVdo so3488RBso .3489SENT. What3490WPWhat would3491MDwould we3492PPwe ...3493:... how3494WRBhow would3495MDwould we3496PPwe respond3497VVrespond to3498TOto that3499DTthat question3500NNquestion ?3501SENT? [MS. KARLAN]3502LOC[MS. KARLAN] Well3503UHWell ,3504,, the3505DTthe fact3506NNfact that3507IN/thatthat a3508DTa loose3509JJloose cannon3510NNcannon like3511INlike Judge3512NPJudge Posner3513NPPosner says3514VVZsay ,3515,, "3516``" do3517VVPdo whatever3518WDTwhatever you3519PPyou feel3520VVPfeel like3521INlike "3522``" is3523VBZbe not3524RBnot what3525WPwhat we3526PPwe 're3527VBPbe asking3528VVGask for3529INfor .3530SENT. We3531PPwe 're3532VBPbe saying3533VVGsay ,3534,, if3535INif you3536PPyou read3537VVPread the3538DTthe words3539NNSword "3540''" because3541INbecause of3542INof sex3543NNsex "3544''" and3545CCand you3546PPyou ask3547VVPask ,3548,, in3549INin 19643550CD@card@ ,3551,, what3552WPwhat did3553VVDdo those3554DTthose words3555NNSword mean3556VVPmean ?3557SENT? They3558PPthey meant3559VVDmean treating3560VVGtreat men3561NNSman differently3562RBdifferently from3563INfrom women3564NNSwoman .3565SENT. So3566RBso if3567INif in3568INin 19643569CD@card@ it3570PPit would3571MDwould be3572VBbe discrimination3573NNdiscrimination to3574TOto fire3575VVfire a3576DTa woman3577NNwoman who3578WPwho wanted3579VVDwant to3580TOto ...3581:... you3582PPyou know3583VVPknow ,3584,, a3585DTa woman3586NNwoman who3587WPwho enjoyed3588VVDenjoy sewing3589NNsewing ,3590,, and3591CCand there3592EXthere 's3593VBZbe a3594DTa famous3595JJfamous case3596NNcase ,3597,, it3598PPit 's3599VBZbe the3600DTthe foundational3601JJfoundational case3602NNcase on3603INon sexual3604JJsexual orientation3605NNorientation where3606WRBwhere they3607PPthey fired3608VVDfire a3609DTa man3610NNman who3611WPwho said3612VVDsay ...3613:... [JUSTICE ALITO]3614LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] We3615PPwe will3616MDwill ...3617:... [MS. KARLAN]3618LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...3619:... his3620PP$his body3621NNbody was3622VBDbe ...3623:... [JUSTICE ALITO]3624LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] We3625PPwe would3626MDwould not3627RBnot be3628VBbe deciding3629VVGdecide a3630DTa major3631JJmajor policy3632NNpolicy question3633NNquestion that3634WDTthat was3635VBDbe not3636RBnot in3637INin Congress3638NPCongress 's3639POS's mind3640NNmind in3641INin 19643642CD@card@ ,3643,, and3644CCand then3645RBthen Congress3646NPCongress has3647VHZhave repeatedly3648RBrepeatedly failed3649VVNfail to3650TOto address3651VVaddress in3652INin the3653DTthe years3654NNSyear since3655INsince then3656RBthen ?3657SENT? [MS. KARLAN]3658LOC[MS. KARLAN] No3659RBno more3660JJRmore than3661INthan what3662WPwhat you3663PPyou did3664VVDdo in3665INin Oncale3666NPOncale .3667SENT. No3668DTno more3669JJRmore than3670INthan what3671WPwhat you3672PPyou did3673VVDdo in3674INin Price3675NPPrice Waterhouse3676NPWaterhouse .3677SENT. No3678DTno more3679JJRmore than3680INthan what3681WPwhat you3682PPyou did3683VVDdo in3684RPin ...3685:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3686LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] All3687DTall right3688NNright .3689SENT. [MS. KARLAN]3690LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...3691:... Newport3692NPNewport News3693NPNews .3694SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]3695LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Is3696VBZbe there3697RBthere ...3698:... is3699VBZbe there3700RBthere ...3701:... in3702INin my3703PP$my mind3704NNmind ,3705,, there3706EXthere are3707VBPbe three3708CDthree basic3709JJbasic parts3710NNSpart to3711TOto this3712DTthis case3713NNcase on3714INon the3715DTthe other3716JJother side3717NNside ,3718,, to3719TOto language3720NNlanguage .3721SENT. You3722PPyou 've3723VHPhave dealt3724VVNdeal with3725INwith that3726DTthat .3727SENT. The3728DTthe parade3729NNparade of3730INof horribles3731NNShorrible ,3732,, you3733PPyou 've3734VHPhave dealt3735VVNdeal with3736INwith that3737DTthat .3738SENT. And3739CCand the3740DTthe third3741JJthird one3742CDone is3743VBZbe the3744DTthe one3745CDone that3746IN/thatthat Alito3747NPAlito is3748VBZbe bringing3749VVGbring up3750RPup in3751INin one3752CDone form3753NNform ,3754,, as3755INas it3756PPit comes3757VVZcome out3758RPout of3759INof the3760DTthe ...3761:... out3762RBout of3763INof the3764DTthe briefs3765NNSbrief ,3766,, as3767INas I3768PPI read3769VVPread it3770PPit in3771INin your3772PP$your opponent3773NNopponent 's3774POS's brief3775NNbrief .3776SENT. I3777PPI would3778MDwould put3779VVput it3780PPit in3781INin these3782DTthese terms3783NNSterm .3784SENT. Imagine3785VVimagine a3786DTa statute3787NNstatute that3788WDTthat says3789VVZsay policemen3790NNSpoliceman ,3791,, dah3792NNdah ,3793,, dah3794NNdah ,3795,, dah3796NNdah ,3797,, must3798MDmust pay3799VVpay damages3800NNSdamage .3801SENT. Passed3802VVNpass a3803DTa long3804JJlong time3805NNtime ago3806RBago .3807SENT. That3808DTthat does3809VVZdo n't3810RBn't apply3811VVapply to3812TOto German3813JJGerman policemen3814NNSpoliceman .3815SENT. [MS. KARLAN]3816LOC[MS. KARLAN] Does3817VVZdo n't3818RBn't apply3819VVapply to3820TOto what3821WPwhat kind3822NNkind of3823INof ...3824:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3825LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] To3826TOTo German3827JJGerman policemen3828NNSpoliceman .3829SENT. The3830DTthe meaning3831NNmeaning is3832VBZbe the3833DTthe same3834JJsame .3835SENT. German3836JJGerman policemen3837NNSpoliceman are3838VBPbe policemen3839NNSpoliceman .3840SENT. But3841CCbut the3842DTthe statute3843NNstatute does3844VVZdo n't3845RBn't apply3846VVapply to3847TOto them3848PPthem .3849SENT. How3850WRBHow do3851VVPdo we3852PPwe know3853VVPknow ?3854SENT? Well3855UHwell ,3856,, we3857PPwe know3858VVPknow through3859INthrough a3860DTa lot3861NNlot of3862INof history3863NNhistory ,3864,, dah3865NNdah ,3866,, dah3867NNdah ,3868,, dah3869NNdah .3870SENT. Okay3871JJokay ?3872SENT? Now3873RBnow ,3874,, that3875WDTthat 's3876VBZbe the3877DTthe ...3878:... that3879WDTthat 's3880VBZbe the3881DTthe box3882NNbox in3883INin which3884WDTwhich I3885PPI put3886VVDput the3887DTthe argument3888NNargument that3889IN/thatthat Justice3890NPJustice Alito3891NPAlito made3892VVDmake .3893SENT. It3894PPit 's3895VBZbe a3896DTa serious3897JJserious legal3898JJlegal argument3899NNargument ,3900,, and3901CCand the3902DTthe argument3903NNargument is3904VBZbe that3905IN/thatthat at3906INat the3907DTthe time3908NNtime Congress3909NPCongress would3910MDwould n't3911RBn't have3912VHhave dreamt3913VVNdream of3914INof this3915DTthis .3916SENT. And3917CCand ,3918,, therefore3919RBtherefore ,3920,, the3921DTthe words3922NNSword ,3923,, though3924INthough they3925PPthey apply3926VVPapply ,3927,, they3928PPthey meant3929VVDmean to3930TOto exclude3931VVexclude the3932DTthe gays3933NNSgay and3934CCand transgender3935NNtransgender .3936SENT. Now3937RBnow ,3938,, what3939WPwhat I3940PPI need3941VVPneed to3942TOto hear3943VVhear is3944VBZbe a3945DTa clear3946JJclear answer3947NNanswer to3948TOto that3949DTthat question3950NNquestion .3951SENT. [MS. KARLAN]3952LOC[MS. KARLAN] I3953PPI think3954VVPthink the3955DTthe way3956NNway to3957TOto think3958VVthink about3959INabout this3960DTthis is3961VBZbe to3962TOto ask3963VVask about3964INabout the3965DTthe specific3966JJspecific behavior3967NNbehavior that3968WDTthat 's3969VBZbe at3970INat issue3971NNissue ,3972,, which3973WDTwhich is3974VBZbe a3975DTa man3976NNman dates3977VVZdate a3978DTa man3979NNman ,3980,, and3981CCand then3982RBthen ask3983VVask :3984:: How3985WRBHow does3986VVZdo that3987DTthat fit3988NNfit within3989INwithin the3990DTthe language3991NNlanguage ?3992SENT? And3993CCand the3994DTthe best3995JJSgood example3996NNexample I3997PPI can3998MDcan give3999VVgive ...4000:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4001LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] It4002PPit fits4003VVZfit .4004SENT. [MS. KARLAN]4005LOC[MS. KARLAN] No4006NPNo ,4007,, I'm4008NPI'm ...4009:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4010LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I4011PPI give4012VVPgive you4013PPyou it4014PPit fits4015VVZfit .4016SENT. [MS. KARLAN]4017LOC[MS. KARLAN] I'm4018NPI'm ...4019:... I4020PPI 'm4021VBPbe about4022RBabout to4023TOto explain4024VVexplain why4025NNwhy ...4026:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4027LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah4028NPYeah .4029SENT. [MS. KARLAN]4030LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...4031:... it4032PPit fits4033VVZfit .4034SENT. Which4035WDTwhich is4036VBZbe the4037DTthe idea4038NNidea was4039VBDbe that4040IN/thatthat people4041NNSpeople should4042MDshould not4043RBnot be4044VBbe denied4045VVNdeny jobs4046NNSjob that4047IN/thatthat they4048PPthey 're4049VBPbe qualified4050VVNqualify to4051TOto do4052VVdo ,4053,, award-winning4054JJaward-winning advocates4055NNSadvocate for4056INfor child4057NNchild services4058NNSservice like4059INlike Gerald4060NPGerald Bostock4061NPBostock should4062MDshould not4063RBnot be4064VBbe denied4065VVNdeny a4066DTa job4067NNjob ,4068,, because4069INbecause they4070PPthey are4071VBPbe a4072DTa man4073NNman who4074WPwho does4075VVZdo something4076NNsomething that4077IN/thatthat if4078INif they4079PPthey were4080VBDbe a4081DTa woman4082NNwoman ,4083,, would4084MDwould cause4085VVcause no4086DTno problems4087NNSproblem at4088INat all4089DTall .4090SENT. So4091RBso just4092RBjust to4093TOto give4094VVgive an4095DTan example4096NNexample from4097INfrom the4098DTthe first4099JJfirst sex4100NNsex discrimination4101NNdiscrimination case4102NNcase this4103DTthis Court4104NPCourt had4105VHDhave ,4106,, which4107WDTwhich was4108VBDbe the4109DTthe Phillips4110NPPhillips against4111INagainst Martin4112NPMartin Marietta4113NPMarietta case4114NNcase ,4115,, a4116DTa woman4117NNwoman who4118WPwho has4119VHZhave children4120NNSchild at4121INat home4122NNhome should4123MDshould not4124RBnot be4125VBbe denied4126VVNdeny a4127DTa job4128NNjob that4129IN/thatthat a4130DTa man4131NNman who4132WPwho has4133VHZhave children4134NNSchild at4135INat home4136NNhome .4137SENT. Now4138RBnow ,4139,, all4140RBall you4141PPyou have4142VHPhave to4143TOto do4144VVdo is4145VBZbe say4146VVsay those4147DTthose words4148NNSword apply4149VVPapply also4150RBalso if4151INif it4152PPit is4153VBZbe a4154DTa woman4155NNwoman who4156WPwho has4157VHZhave a4158DTa wife4159NNwife at4160INat home4161NNhome ...4162:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4163LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Counsel4164NPCounsel ,4165,, I4166PPI ...4167:... [MS. KARLAN]4168LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...4169:... rather4170RBrather than4171INthan children4172NNSchild .4173SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4174LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Several4175JJseveral ,4176,, I4177PPI think4178VVPthink about4179INabout 234180CD@card@ ,4181,, states4182NNSstate have4183VHPhave been4184VBNbe passing4185VVGpass laws4186NNSlaw to4187TOto address4188VVaddress these4189DTthese ...4190:... these4191DTthese issues4192NNSissue .4193SENT. And4194CCand I4195PPI do4196VVPdo n't4197RBn't know4198VVknow how4199WRBhow many4200JJmany of4201INof them4202PPthem ,4203,, but4204CCbut I4205PPI think4206VVPthink it4207PPit 's4208VBZbe a4209DTa big4210JJbig part4211NNpart of4212INof them4213PPthem ,4214,, when4215WRBwhen they4216PPthey do4217VVPdo extend4218VVextend the4219DTthe coverage4220NNcoverage against4221INagainst discrimination4222NNdiscrimination on4223INon the4224DTthe basis4225NNbasis of4226INof sex4227NNsex to4228TOto sexual4229JJsexual orientation4230NNorientation ,4231,, transgender4232NNtransgender ,4233,, they4234PPthey also4235RBalso include4236VVPinclude an4237DTan exemption4238NNexemption for4239INfor religious4240JJreligious organizations4241NNSorganization .4242SENT. Now4243RBnow ,4244,, if4245INif we4246PPwe 're4247VBPbe going4248VVGgo to4249TOto be4250VBbe extending4251VVGextend the4252DTthe ...4253:... the4254DTthe understanding4255NNunderstanding of4256INof what4257WPwhat sex4258NNsex encompasses4259VVZencompass ,4260,, and4261CCand I4262PPI know4263VVPknow your4264PP$your argument4265NNargument ...4266:... [MS. KARLAN]4267LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yeah4268NPYeah .4269SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4270LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] ...4271:... that4272IN/thatthat that4273DTthat 's4274VBZbe not4275RBnot doing4276VVGdo that4277IN/thatthat ,4278,, how4279WRBhow do4280VVPdo we4281PPwe address4282VVaddress that4283DTthat other4284JJother concern4285NNconcern ,4286,, that4287WDTthat at4288INat least4289JJSleast ,4290,, I4291PPI think4292VVPthink almost4293RBalmost every4294DTevery state4295NNstate legislature4296NNlegislature that4297WDTthat has4298VHZhave extended4299VVNextend it4300PPit has4301VHZhave felt4302VVNfeel compelled4303VVNcompel to4304TOto address4305VVaddress ?4306SENT? [MS. KARLAN]4307LOC[MS. KARLAN] Well4308UHWell ,4309,, I4310PPI ...4311:... I4312PPI ...4313:... I4314PPI would4315MDwould say4316VVsay three4317CDthree things4318NNSthing about4319INabout that4320DTthat :4321:: The4322DTthe first4323JJfirst is4324VBZbe this4325DTthis Court4326NPCourt has4327VHZhave already4328RBalready created4329VVNcreate an4330DTan exemption4331NNexemption for4332INfor sincere4333JJsincere religious4334JJreligious belief4335NNbelief for4336INfor a4337DTa large4338JJlarge category4339NNcategory of4340INof employers4341NNSemployer through4342INthrough the4343DTthe ministerial4344JJministerial exception4345NNexception .4346SENT. The4347DTthe second4348NNsecond is4349VBZbe that4350IN/thatthat Congress4351NPCongress balanced4352VVDbalance these4353DTthese issues4354NNSissue and4355CCand has4356VHZhave rebalanced4357VVNrebalance them4358PPthem several4359JJseveral times4360NNStime in4361INin the4362DTthe co-religionist4363NNco-religionist exception4364NNexception .4365SENT. The4366DTthe third4367JJthird thing4368NNthing I4369PPI would4370MDwould say4371VVsay is4372VBZbe to4373TOto understand4374VVunderstand this4375DTthis in4376INin context4377NNcontext ,4378,, which4379WDTwhich is4380VBZbe 854381CD@card@ percent4382NNpercent of4383INof American4384JJAmerican employers4385NNSemployer are4386VBPbe not4387RBnot covered4388VVNcover by4389INby Title4390NPTitle VII4391NPVII at4392INat all4393DTall .4394SENT. So4395RBso as4396RBas to4397TOto those4398DTthose employers4399NNSemployer ,4400,, if4401INif they4402PPthey have4403VHPhave religious4404JJreligious objections4405NNSobjection to4406TOto hiring4407VVGhire someone4408NNsomeone who4409WPwho is4410VBZbe gay4411JJgay ,4412,, they4413PPthey 're4414VBPbe free4415JJfree to4416TOto continue4417VVcontinue doing4418VVGdo that4419DTthat .4420SENT. And4421CCand the4422DTthe fourth4423JJfourth is4424VBZbe to4425TOto make4426VVmake it4427PPit very4428RBvery clear4429JJclear that4430IN/thatthat the4431DTthe question4432NNquestion is4433VBZbe not4434RBnot whether4435INwhether people4436NNSpeople have4437VHPhave religious4438JJreligious objections4439NNSobjection to4440TOto homosexuality4441NNhomosexuality ;4442:; it4443PPit 's4444VBZbe whether4445INwhether they4446PPthey have4447VHPhave religious4448JJreligious objections4449NNSobjection to4450TOto hiring4451VVGhire someone4452NNsomeone who4453WPwho is4454VBZbe gay4455JJgay or4456CCor lesbian4457JJlesbian .4458SENT. And4459CCand there4460EXthere are4461VBPbe many4462JJmany employers4463NNSemployer whose4464WP$whose own4465JJown religious4466JJreligious beliefs4467NNSbelief would4468MDwould tell4469VVtell them4470PPthem this4471DTthis would4472MDwould be4473VBbe immoral4474JJimmoral for4475INfor them4476PPthem ,4477,, who4478WPwho have4479VHPhave no4480DTno problem4481NNproblem hiring4482VVGhire gays4483NNSgay and4484CCand lesbians4485NNSlesbian who4486WPwho are4487VBPbe qualified4488VVNqualify to4489TOto do4490VVdo a4491DTa job4492NNjob .4493SENT. If4494INif I4495PPI could4496MDcould just4497RBjust ask4498VVask the4499DTthe Court4500NPCourt to4501TOto do4502VVdo one4503CDone thing4504NNthing in4505INin thinking4506VVGthink back4507RBback to4508TOto 19644509CD@card@ ,4510,, it4511PPit is4512VBZbe to4513TOto look4514VVlook at4515INat the4516DTthe two4517CDtwo foundational4518JJfoundational opinions4519NNSopinion on4520INon which4521WDTwhich everybody4522NNeverybody has4523VHZhave played4524VVNplay a4525DTa game4526NNgame of4527INof telephone4528NNtelephone ever4529RBever since4530RBsince .4531SENT. It4532PPit 's4533VBZbe like4534INlike your4535PP$your opinion4536NNopinion last4537JJlast term4538NNterm in4539INin Argus4540NPArgus Media4541NPMedia ,4542,, where4543WRBwhere you4544PPyou ask4545VVPask where4546WRBwhere did4547VVDdo the4548DTthe idea4549NNidea that4550IN/thatthat homosexuality4551NNhomosexuality was4552VBDbe n't4553RBn't covered4554VVNcover come4555VVNcome from4556INfrom ?4557SENT? It4558PPit came4559VVDcome from4560INfrom first4561RBfirst a4562DTa case4563NNcase where4564WRBwhere a4565DTa gay4566JJgay black4567JJblack man4568NNman said4569VVDsay he4570PPhe was4571VBDbe being4572VBGbe treated4573VVNtreat worse4574JJRbad than4575INthan gay4576JJgay white4577JJwhite men4578NNSman .4579SENT. It4580PPit was4581VBDbe n't4582RBn't even4583RBeven a4584DTa sexual4585JJsexual discrimination4586NNdiscrimination case4587NNcase .4588SENT. The4589DTthe second4590JJsecond one4591CDone came4592VVDcome from4593INfrom a4594DTa straight4595JJstraight man4596NNman who4597WPwho was4598VBDbe fired4599VVNfire because4600INbecause ...4601:... who4602WPwho was4603VBDbe denied4604VVNdeny a4605DTa job4606NNjob because4607INbecause he4608PPhe said4609VVDsay his4610PP$his hobby4611NNhobby was4612VBDbe sewing4613VVGsew .4614SENT. And4615CCand the4616DTthe employer4617NNemployer said4618VVDsay :4619:: That4620WDTthat 's4621VBZbe an4622DTan effeminate4623JJeffeminate hobby4624NNhobby ,4625,, so4626RBso I4627PPI bet4628VVPbet you4629PPyou 're4630VBPbe gay4631JJgay .4632SENT. If4633INif you4634PPyou look4635VVPlook at4636INat the4637DTthe reasoning4638NNreasoning in4639INin those4640DTthose cases4641NNScase ,4642,, you4643PPyou will4644MDwill realize4645VVrealize that4646IN/thatthat it4647PPit was4648VBDbe not4649RBnot until4650INuntil Hively4651NPHively that4652IN/thatthat any4653DTany court4654NNcourt did4655VVDdo a4656DTa careful4657JJcareful reading4658NNreading of4659INof the4660DTthe statute4661NNstatute using4662VVGuse contemporaneous4663JJcontemporaneous methods4664NNSmethod of4665INof textual4666JJtextual interpretation4667NNinterpretation ...4668:... [JUSTICE ALITO]4669LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But4670CCbut you4671PPyou gave4672VVDgive your4673PP$your ...4674:... [MS. KARLAN]4675LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...4676:... and4677CCand since4678INsince then4679RBthen a4680DTa majority4681NNmajority of4682INof justices4683NNSjustice ...4684:... I4685PPI mean4686VVPmean a4687DTa majority4688NNmajority of4689INof judges4690NNSjudge have4691VHPhave held4692VVNhold that4693IN/thatthat sexual4694JJsexual orientation4695NNorientation is4696VBZbe a4697DTa subset4698NNsubset of4699INof sex4700NNsex discrimination4701NNdiscrimination .4702SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]4703LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Justice4704NPJustice Breyer4705NPBreyer characterized4706VVNcharacterize what4707WPwhat I4708PPI said4709VVDsay earlier4710RBRearlier as4711INas conceding4712VVGconcede that4713DTthat sexual4714JJsexual orientation4715NNorientation discrimination4716NNdiscrimination fits4717VVZfit the4718DTthe words4719NNSword of4720INof Title4721NPTitle VII4722NPVII ,4723,, but4724CCbut that4725IN/thatthat we4726PPwe should4727MDshould take4728VVtake a4729DTa broader4730JJRbroad view4731NNview of4732INof what4733WPwhat Congress4734NPCongress had4735VHDhave in4736INin mind4737NNmind .4738SENT. But4739CCbut that4740DTthat was4741VBDbe not4742RBnot ...4743:... that4744WDTthat was4745VBDbe not4746RBnot the4747DTthe premise4748NNpremise of4749INof my4750PP$my argument4751NNargument .4752SENT. And4753CCand your4754PP$your core4755NNcore ...4756:... the4757DTthe ...4758:... the4759DTthe parties4760NNSparty have4761VHPhave in4762INin their4763PP$their briefs4764NNSbrief ,4765,, have4766VHPhave all4767DTall of4768INof these4769DTthese comparisons4770NNScomparison ,4771,, and4772CCand they4773PPthey will4774MDwill make4775VVmake your4776PP$your head4777NNhead spin4778NNspin if4779INif you4780PPyou ...4781:... if4782INif you4783PPyou try4784VVPtry to4785TOto figure4786VVfigure them4787PPthem all4788DTall out4789RPout .4790SENT. 24791LS2 But4792CCbut let4793VVlet me4794PPme just4795RBjust go4796VVPgo to4797TOto your4798PP$your core4799NNcore one4800CDone ,4801,, which4802WDTwhich you4803PPyou began4804VVDbegin with4805INwith today4806NNtoday .4807SENT. A4808DTa man4809NNman is4810VBZbe attracted4811VVNattract to4812TOto other4813JJother men4814NNSman .4815SENT. He4816PPhe 's4817VBZbe fired4818VVNfire ,4819,, let4820VVlet 's4821VBZbe say4822VVsay .4823SENT. A4824DTa woman4825NNwoman is4826VBZbe attracted4827VVNattract to4828TOto men4829NNSman ;4830:; she4831PPshe is4832VBZbe not4833RBnot fired4834VVNfire .4835SENT. You4836PPyou say4837VVPsay that4838DTthat 's4839VBZbe all4840DTall you4841PPyou need4842VVPneed to4843TOto look4844VVlook at4845INat .4846SENT. That4847DTthat 's4848VBZbe discrimination4849NNdiscrimination on4850INon the4851DTthe basis4852NNbasis of4853INof sex4854NNsex ,4855,, right4856RBright ?4857SENT? [MS. KARLAN]4858LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yes4859NPYes .4860SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]4861LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Okay4862NPOkay .4863SENT. That4864DTthat 's4865VBZbe not4866RBnot ...4867:... that4868WDTthat 's4869VBZbe not4870RBnot correct4871JJcorrect ,4872,, because4873INbecause there4874EXthere are4875VBPbe two4876CDtwo possible4877JJpossible explanations4878NNSexplanation for4879INfor what4880WPwhat happened4881VVDhappen there4882RBthere .4883SENT. It4884PPit could4885MDcould be4886VBbe based4887VVNbase on4888INon sexual4889JJsexual orientation4890NNorientation ,4891,, or4892CCor it4893PPit could4894MDcould just4895RBjust be4896VBbe based4897VVNbase on4898INon the4899DTthe fact4900NNfact that4901IN/thatthat the4902DTthe employer4903NNemployer wants4904VVZwant ...4905:... does4906VVZdo not4907RBnot want4908VVwant to4909TOto hire4910VVhire men4911NNSman .4912SENT. Now4913RBnow ,4914,, if4915INif you4916PPyou add4917VVPadd in4918INin two4919CDtwo other4920JJother cases4921NNScase ,4922,, that4923IN/thatthat a4924DTa man4925NNman who4926WPwho is4927VBZbe attracted4928VVNattract to4929TOto women4930NNSwoman ,4931,, not4932RBnot fired4933VVNfire ,4934,, a4935DTa woman4936NNwoman who4937WPwho 's4938VBZbe attracted4939VVNattract to4940TOto women4941NNSwoman ,4942,, is4943VBZbe fired4944VVNfire ,4945,, then4946RBthen you4947PPyou have4948VHPhave a4949DTa much4950RBmuch better4951JJRgood idea4952NNidea the4953DTthe basis4954NNbasis for4955INfor the4956DTthe discrimination4957NNdiscrimination .4958SENT. And4959CCand it4960PPit 's4961VBZbe sexual4962JJsexual orientation4963NNorientation .4964SENT. It4965PPit 's4966VBZbe not4967RBnot sex4968NNsex .4969SENT. [MS. KARLAN]4970LOC[MS. KARLAN] But4971CCbut in4972INin a4973DTa case4974NNcase like4975INlike the4976DTthe two4977CDtwo cases4978NNScase before4979INbefore this4980DTthis Court4981NPCourt where4982WRBwhere the4983DTthe employer4984NNemployer had4985VHDhave hired4986VVNhire these4987DTthese men4988NNSman and4989CCand they4990PPthey were4991VBDbe already4992RBalready there4993RBthere ,4994,, the4995DTthe supposition4996NNsupposition you4997PPyou made4998VVDmake in4999INin your5000PP$your question5001NNquestion does5002VVZdo n't5003RBn't apply5004VVapply ,5005,, which5006WDTwhich is5007VBZbe we5008PPwe know5009VVPknow this5010DTthis is5011VBZbe an5012DTan employer5013NNemployer who5014WPwho 's5015VBZbe willing5016JJwilling to5017TOto hire5018VVhire men5019NNSman .5020SENT. Indeed5021RBindeed ,5022,, the5023DTthe employer5024NNemployer in5025INin Gerald5026NPGerald ...5027:... I5028PPI mean5029VVPmean the5030DTthe employer5031NNemployer in5032INin Don5033NPDon Zarda5034NPZarda 's5035POS's case5036NNcase had5037VHDhave only5038JJonly men5039NNSman as5040INas skydiving5041VVGskydive instructors5042NNSinstructor .5043SENT. So5044RBso when5045WRBwhen he5046PPhe fires5047VVZfire a5048DTa man5049NNman who5050WPwho wants5051VVZwant to5052TOto date5053VVdate a5054DTa woman5055NNwoman and5056CCand he5057PPhe ...5058:... I5059PPI mean5060VVPmean a5061DTa man5062NNman who5063WPwho wants5064VVZwant to5065TOto date5066VVdate a5067DTa man5068NNman and5069CCand he5070PPhe does5071VVZdo not5072RBnot fire5073VVfire a5074DTa woman5075NNwoman who5076WPwho wants5077VVZwant to5078TOto date5079VVdate a5080DTa man5081NNman ...5082:... [JUSTICE ALITO]5083LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] The5084NPThe ...5085:... the5086DTthe point5087NNpoint is5088VBZbe that5089DTthat discrimination5090NNdiscrimination on5091INon the5092DTthe basis5093NNbasis of5094INof sex5095NNsex in5096INin the5097DTthe sense5098NNsense that5099IN/thatthat Congress5100NPCongress understood5101VVDunderstand it5102PPit in5103INin 19645104CD@card@ is5105VBZbe a5106DTa different5107JJdifferent concept5108NNconcept from5109INfrom discrimination5110NNdiscrimination on5111INon the5112DTthe basis5113NNbasis of5114INof ...5115:... [MS. KARLAN]5116LOC[MS. KARLAN] Well5117UHWell ,5118,, in5119RBin ...5120:... [JUSTICE ALITO]5121LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] ...5122:... sexual5123JJsexual orientation5124NNorientation .5125SENT. [MS. KARLAN]5126LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...5127:... in5128INin ...5129:... [JUSTICE ALITO]5130LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] And5131CCand that5132DTthat 's5133VBZbe what5134WPwhat you5135PPyou 're5136VBPbe fighting5137VVGfight .5138SENT. You5139PPyou 're5140VBPbe trying5141VVGtry to5142TOto change5143VVchange the5144DTthe meaning5145NNmeaning of5146INof what5147WPwhat Congress5148NPCongress understood5149VVDunderstand sex5150NNsex to5151TOto mean5152VVmean and5153CCand what5154WPwhat everybody5155NNeverybody understood5156VVDunderstand ...5157:... [MS. KARLAN]5158LOC[MS. KARLAN] I5159PPI ...5160:... I'm5161NNI'm ...5162:... [JUSTICE ALITO]5163LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] ...5164:... sex5165NNsex to5166TOto mean5167VVmean in5168INin 19645169CD@card@ .5170SENT. [MS. KARLAN]5171LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...5172:... not5173RBnot trying5174VVGtry to5175TOto change5176VVchange that5177IN/thatthat at5178INat all5179DTall .5180SENT. I5181PPI 'm5182VBPbe simply5183RBsimply saying5184VVGsay that5185IN/thatthat if5186INif a5187DTa man5188NNman and5189CCand a5190DTa woman5191NNwoman both5192CCboth wanted5193VVDwant to5194TOto sew5195VVsew and5196CCand you5197PPyou fire5198VVfire the5199DTthe man5200NNman who5201WPwho loves5202VVZlove sewing5203NNsewing and5204CCand you5205PPyou do5206VVPdo n't5207RBn't fire5208VVfire the5209DTthe woman5210NNwoman who5211WPwho loves5212VVZlove sewing5213NNsewing ,5214,, that5215WDTthat 's5216VBZbe discrimination5217NNdiscrimination pure5218JJpure and5219CCand simple5220JJsimple ,5221,, sex5222NNsex discrimination5223NNdiscrimination .5224SENT. If5225INif you5226PPyou fire5227VVfire a5228DTa ...5229:... if5230INif you5231PPyou fire5232VVfire the5233DTthe man5234NNman who5235WPwho ...5236:... thank5237VVthank you5238PPyou .5239SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5240LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank5241VVthank you5242PPyou ,5243,, counsel5244NNcounsel .5245SENT. Counsel5246NNcounsel .5247SENT. [5248SYM[ LAUGHTER5249NNlaughter ]5250SYM] [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5251LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Sorry5252RBsorry .5253SENT.

[MR. HARRIS]5254LOC[MR. HARRIS] Mr5255NPMr .5256SENT. Chief5257NPChief Justice5258NPJustice ,5259,, and5260CCand may5261MDmay it5262PPit please5263VVplease the5264DTthe Court5265NNcourt :5266:: [5267SYM[ LAUGHTER5268NNlaughter ]5269SYM] [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5270LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Touché5271NPTouché .5272SENT. [MR. HARRIS]5273LOC[MR. HARRIS] In5274INin ...5275:... in5276INin 19825277CD@card@ ,5278,, Wisconsin5279NPWisconsin became5280VVDbecome the5281DTthe first5282JJfirst state5283NNstate in5284INin the5285DTthe country5286NNcountry to5287TOto pass5288VVpass a5289DTa law5290NNlaw banning5291VVGban discrimination5292NNdiscrimination because5293INbecause of5294INof sexual5295JJsexual orientation5296NNorientation in5297INin private5298JJprivate employment5299NNemployment .5300SENT. The5301DTthe proponents5302NNSproponent of5303INof that5304DTthat law5305NNlaw celebrated5306VVDcelebrate its5307PP$its passage5308NNpassage as5309INas a5310DTa landmark5311JJlandmark achievement5312NNachievement for5313INfor gay5314JJgay rights5315NNSright .5316SENT. According5317VVGaccord to5318TOto the5319DTthe plaintiffs5320NNSplaintiff here5321RBhere ,5322,, however5323RBhowever ,5324,, Wisconsin5325NPWisconsin 's5326POS's landmark5327JJlandmark law5328NNlaw actually5329RBactually had5330VHDhave little5331JJlittle ,5332,, if5333INif any5334DTany ,5335,, practical5336JJpractical impact5337NNimpact because5338INbecause Congress5339NPCongress had5340VHDhave already5341RBalready banned5342VVNban sexual5343JJsexual orientation5344NNorientation discrimination5345NNdiscrimination nationwide5346JJnationwide ,5347,, 185348CD@card@ years5349NNSyear earlier5350RBRearlier in5351INin the5352DTthe Civil5353NPCivil Rights5354NPSRights Act5355NPAct of5356INof 19645357CD@card@ .5358SENT. To5359TOTo quote5360VVquote Judge5361NPJudge Lynch5362NPLynch 's5363POS's dissent5364NNdissent below5365RBbelow ,5366,, Congress5367NPCongress did5368VVDdo no5369DTno such5370JJsuch thing5371NNthing .5372SENT. Sex5373NNsex and5374CCand sexual5375JJsexual orientation5376NNorientation are5377VBPbe independent5378JJindependent and5379CCand distinct5380JJdistinct characteristics5381NNScharacteristic ,5382,, and5383CCand sexual5384JJsexual orientation5385NNorientation discrimination5386NNdiscrimination by5387INby itself5388PPitself does5389VVZdo not5390RBnot constitute5391VVconstitute discrimination5392NNdiscrimination because5393INbecause of5394INof sex5395NNsex under5396INunder Title5397NPTitle VII5398NPVII .5399SENT. That5400DTthat 's5401VBZbe just5402RBjust as5403INas true5404JJtrue today5405NNtoday as5406INas it5407PPit was5408VBDbe in5409INin 115410CD@card@ 19645411CD@card@ .5412SENT. The5413DTthe core5414JJcore error5415NNerror in5416INin the5417DTthe Second5418NPSecond Circu5419NPCircu it5420PPit 's5421VBZbe holding5422VVGhold is5423VBZbe actually5424RBactually quite5425RBquite similar5426JJsimilar to5427TOto the5428DTthe error5429NNerror that5430WDTthat led5431VVDlead this5432DTthis Court5433NPCourt to5434TOto reverse5435VVreverse in5436INin Oncale5437NPOncale .5438SENT. In5439INin Oncale5440NPOncale ,5441,, the5442DTthe Fifth5443NPFifth Circuit5444NPCircuit had5445VHDhave held5446VVNhold that5447IN/thatthat same-sex5448JJsame-sex harassment5449NNharassment claims5450NNSclaim were5451VBDbe categorically5452RBcategorically excluded5453VVNexclude from5454INfrom Title5455NPTitle VII5456NPVII .5457SENT. This5458DTthis Court5459NPCourt correctly5460RBcorrectly reversed5461VVDreverse and5462CCand held5463VVDhold that5464IN/thatthat such5465JJsuch claims5466NNSclaim may5467MDmay well5468RBwell be5469VBbe cognizable5470JJcognizable ,5471,, as5472RBas long5473RBlong as5474INas the5475DTthe plaintiff5476NNplaintiff meets5477VVZmeet all5478DTall requirements5479NNSrequirement of5480INof the5481DTthe statute5482NNstatute ,5483,, especially5484RBespecially what5485WPwhat this5486DTthis Court5487NPCourt called5488VVDcall the5489DTthe "5490``" critical5491JJcritical inquiry5492NNinquiry into5493INinto whether5494INwhether members5495NNSmember of5496INof one5497CDone sex5498NNsex were5499VBDbe being5500VBGbe treated5501VVNtreat worse5502JJRbad than5503INthan members5504NNSmember of5505INof the5506DTthe other5507JJother sex5508NNsex .5509SENT. "5510''" This5511DTthis case5512NNcase is5513VBZbe just5514RBjust the5515DTthe mirror5516NNmirror image5517NNimage of5518INof Oncale5519NPOncale .5520SENT. Whereas5521INwhereas the5522DTthe lower5523JJRlow courts5524NNScourt in5525INin Oncale5526NPOncale adopted5527VVDadopt a5528DTa categorical5529JJcategorical exclusion5530NNexclusion ,5531,, the5532DTthe Second5533NPSecond Circuit5534NPCircuit adopted5535VVDadopt a5536DTa rule5537NNrule of5538INof per5539FWper se5540FWse inclusion5541NNinclusion in5542INin which5543WDTwhich plaintiffs5544NNSplaintiff alleging5545VVGallege sexual5546JJsexual orientation5547NNorientation discrimination5548NNdiscrimination receive5549VVreceive a5550DTa free5551JJfree pass5552NNpass around5553INaround the5554DTthe critical5555JJcritical inquiry5556NNinquiry into5557INinto whether5558INwhether men5559NNSman and5560CCand women5561NNSwoman are5562VBPbe being5563VBGbe treated5564VVNtreat differently5565RBdifferently because5566INbecause of5567INof their5568PP$their sex5569NNsex .5570SENT. In5571INin short5572JJshort ,5573,, the5574DTthe Second5575NPSecond Circuit5576NPCircuit simply5577RBsimply changed5578VVDchange the5579DTthe ultimate5580JJultimate question5581NNquestion from5582INfrom sex5583NNsex to5584TOto sexual5585JJsexual orientation5586NNorientation .5587SENT. But5588CCbut because5589INbecause both5590DTboth men5591NNSman and5592CCand women5593NNSwoman may5594MDmay have5595VHhave same5596JJsame sex5597NNsex attractions5598NNSattraction or5599CCor partners5600NNSpartner ,5601,, a5602DTa stand-alone5603JJstand-alone allegation5604NNallegation of5605INof sexual5606JJsexual orientation5607NNorientation discrimination5608NNdiscrimination cannot5609MDcan ,5610,, without5611INwithout more5612RBRmore ,5613,, show5614VVshow discriminatory5615JJdiscriminatory treatment5616NNtreatment ...5617:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5618LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Excuse5619VVexcuse me5620PPme .5621SENT. Can5622MDcan I5623PPI understand5624VVunderstand your5625PP$your argument5626NNargument in5627INin context5628NNcontext ?5629SENT? Let5630VVlet 's5631VBZbe answer5632VVanswer the5633DTthe question5634NNquestion .5635SENT. Employer5636NNemployer looks5637VVZlook at5638INat a5639DTa man5640NNman who5641WPwho applies5642VVZapply and5643CCand says5644VVZsay :5645:: One5646CDOne of5647INof my5648PP$my hobbies5649NNShobby is5650VBZbe sewing5651VVGsew .5652SENT. And5653CCand the5654DTthe employer5655NNemployer says5656VVZsay :5657:: That5658WDTthat 's5659VBZbe an5660DTan effeminate5661JJeffeminate hobby5662NNhobby .5663SENT. You5664PPyou may5665MDmay be5666VBbe gay5667JJgay .5668SENT. You're5669NNYou're ...5670:... I5671PPI 'm5672VBPbe not5673RBnot hiring5674VVGhire you5675PPyou .5676SENT. So5677RBso is5678VBZbe that5679IN/thatthat a5680DTa mixed5681JJmixed motive5682NNmotive case5683NNcase ?5684SENT? And5685CCand ...5686:... and5687CCand are5688VBPbe we5689PPwe going5690VVGgo to5691TOto be5692VBbe trying5693VVGtry somehow5694RBsomehow to5695TOto parse5696VVparse that5697IN/thatthat there5698EXthere 's5699VBZbe some5700DTsome sort5701NNsort of5702INof substantial5703JJsubstantial legal5704JJlegal difference5705NNdifference between5706INbetween the5707DTthe belief5708NNbelief that5709IN/thatthat you5710PPyou 're5711VBPbe too5712RBtoo effeminate5713JJeffeminate or5714CCor that5715IN/thatthat a5716DTa lesbian5717NNlesbian is5718VBZbe too5719RBtoo macho5720JJmacho ,5721,, whichever5722WDTwhichever ,5723,, from5724INfrom you5725PPyou 're5726VBPbe attracted5727VVNattract to5728TOto the5729DTthe other5730JJother sex5731NNsex ?5732SENT? How5733WRBHow do5734VVPdo you5735PPyou tease5736VVPtease that5737IN/thatthat out5738RBout ?5739SENT? [MR. HARRIS]5740LOC[MR. HARRIS] Justice5741NPJustice Sotomayor5742NPSotomayor ,5743,, I5744PPI do5745VVPdo n't5746RBn't disagree5747VVdisagree that5748IN/thatthat there5749EXthere will5750MDwill be5751VBbe tough5752JJtough cases5753NNScase at5754INat the5755DTthe margins5756NNSmargin ,5757,, but5758CCbut the5759DTthe problem5760NNproblem with5761INwith what5762WPwhat the5763DTthe Second5764JJsecond Circuit5765NNcircuit did5766VVDdo is5767VBZbe they5768PPthey glossed5769VVDgloss over5770INover those5771DTthose hard5772JJhard questions5773NNSquestion and5774CCand said5775VVDsay :5776:: We5777PPwe 're5778VBPbe just5779RBjust going5780VVGgo to5781TOto adopt5782VVadopt ...5783:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5784LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Well5785UHWell ,5786,, are5787VBPbe n't5788RBn't you5789PPyou 105790CD@card@ ...5791:... MR5792NPMr .5793SENT. HARRIS5794NPHarris ...5795:... a5796DTa per5797FWper se5798FWse rule5799NNrule that5800IN/thatthat if5801INif you5802PPyou ...5803:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5804LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...5805:... are5806VBPbe n't5807RBn't you5808PPyou glossing5809VVGgloss over5810INover the5811DTthe BFOQ5812NPBFOQ ,5813,, meaning5814NNmeaning ,5815,, what5816WPwhat it5817PPit seems5818VVZseem like5819INlike you5820PPyou 're5821VBPbe confusing5822VVGconfuse is5823VBZbe three5824CDthree concepts5825NNSconcept ,5826,, Title5827NPTitle VII5828NPVII has5829VHZhave causation5830NNcausation and5831CCand injury5832NNinjury .5833SENT. Not5834RBnot hiring5835VVGhire ,5836,, not5837RBnot firing5838NNfiring ,5839,, that5840WDTthat 's5841VBZbe the5842DTthe injury5843NNinjury .5844SENT. Now5845RBnow the5846DTthe question5847NNquestion is5848VBZbe what5849WPwhat caused5850VVDcause that5851RBthat ?5852SENT? Being5853VBGbe too5854RBtoo effeminate5855JJeffeminate ,5856,, that5857WDTthat 's5858VBZbe a5859DTa sexual5860JJsexual trait5861NNtrait ;5862:; being5863VBGbe attracted5864VVNattract to5865TOto ,5866,, if5867INif you5868PPyou 're5869VBPbe a5870DTa man5871NNman ,5872,, to5873TOto another5874DTanother man5875NNman ,5876,, that5877WDTthat 's5878VBZbe a5879DTa sexual5880JJsexual trait5881NNtrait .5882SENT. It5883PPit 's5884VBZbe caused5885VVNcause by5886INby those5887DTthose two5888CDtwo things5889NNSthing .5890SENT. Are5891VBPbe n't5892RBn't then5893RBthen we5894PPwe moving5895VVGmove to5896TOto the5897DTthe third5898JJthird question5899NNquestion ,5900,, which5901WDTwhich is5902VBZbe :5903:: Is5904VBZbe there5905RBthere a5906DTa reason5907NNreason independent5908JJindependent of5909INof your5910PP$your religious5911JJreligious belief5912NNbelief or5913CCor your5914PP$your innate5915JJinnate hatred5916NNhatred and5917CCand invidious5918JJinvidious discrimination5919NNdiscrimination for5920INfor why5921WRBwhy you5922PPyou 're5923VBPbe treating5924VVGtreat this5925DTthis person5926NNperson differently5927RBdifferently ?5928SENT? And5929CCand if5930INif there5931EXthere is5932VBZbe ,5933,, you5934PPyou have5935VHPhave a5936DTa BFOQ5937NPBFOQ .5938SENT. You5939PPyou do5940VVPdo n't5941RBn't have5942VHhave to5943TOto hire5944VVhire them5945PPthem .5946SENT. You5947PPyou can5948MDcan fire5949VVfire them5950PPthem .5951SENT. But5952CCbut if5953INif there5954EXthere is5955VBZbe n't5956RBn't ,5957,, they5958PPthey 're5959VBPbe doing5960VVGdo their5961PP$their job5962NNjob ,5963,, and5964CCand they5965PPthey 're5966VBPbe not5967RBnot bothering5968VVGbother you5969PPyou ,5970,, and5971CCand they5972PPthey are5973VBPbe not5974RBnot bringing5975VVGbring their5976PP$their boyfriend5977NNboyfriend or5978CCor girlfriend5979NNgirlfriend ,5980,, if5981INif it5982PPit 's5983VBZbe the5984DTthe opposite5985JJopposite sex5986NNsex ,5987,, to5988TOto a5989DTa function5990NNfunction to5991TOto your5992PP$your private5993JJprivate home5994NNhome because5995INbecause you5996PPyou do5997VVPdo n't5998RBn't want5999VVwant them6000PPthem there6001RBthere or6002CCor whatever6003WDTwhatever else6004RBelse is6005VBZbe offensive6006JJoffensive to6007TOto you6008PPyou ,6009,, they6010PPthey 're6011VBPbe just6012RBjust working6013VVGwork .6014SENT. So6015RBso I6016PPI do6017VVPdo n't6018RBn't understand6019VVunderstand why6020WRBwhy those6021DTthose are6022VBPbe hard6023JJhard cases6024NNScase .6025SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6026LOC[MR. HARRIS] Well6027UHWell ...6028:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6029LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Any6030DTany harder6031JJRhard than6032INthan what6033WPwhat the6034DTthe law6035NNlaw applies6036VVZapply for6037INfor race6038NNrace discrimination6039NNdiscrimination ,6040,, for6041INfor religious6042JJreligious discrimination6043NNdiscrimination ,6044,, for6045INfor any6046DTany of6047INof the6048DTthe other6049JJother forms6050NNSform ,6051,, national6052JJnational origin6053NNorigin discrimination6054NNdiscrimination .6055SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6056LOC[MR. HARRIS] So6057RBso ,6058,, Your6059PP$your Honor6060NPHonor ,6061,, as6062INas this6063DTthis Court6064NPCourt has6065VHZhave emphasized6066VVNemphasize in6067INin cases6068NNScase such6069JJsuch as6070INas Johnson6071NPJohnson Controls6072NPControls ,6073,, the6074DTthe BFOQ6075NPBFOQ exception6076NNexception has6077VHZhave been6078VBNbe interpreted6079VVNinterpret extremely6080RBextremely narrowly6081RBnarrowly ,6082,, and6083CCand so6084RBso I6085PPI think6086VVPthink it6087PPit ...6088:... it6089PPit ...6090:... it6091PPit is6092VBZbe important6093JJimportant as6094INas this6095DTthis Court6096NPCourt emphasized6097VVDemphasize in6098INin Oncale6099NPOncale ,6100,, the6101DTthe Court6102NPCourt emphasized6103VVDemphasize several6104JJseveral times6105NNStime the6106DTthe need6107NNneed to6108TOto ensure6109VVensure strict6110JJstrict compliance6111NNcompliance with6112INwith all6113DTall requirements6114NNSrequirement of6115INof the6116DTthe statute6117NNstatute ,6118,, including6119VVGinclude the6120DTthe discrimination6121NNdiscrimination element6122NNelement ,6123,, because6124INbecause once6125RBonce you6126PPyou find6127VVPfind discrimination6128NNdiscrimination ,6129,, it6130PPit gets6131VVZget very6132RBvery hard6133JJhard to6134TOto make6135VVmake out6136RPout the6137DTthe BFOQ6138NPBFOQ .6139SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]6140LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Would6141MDwould Oncale6142NPOncale ...6143:... [MR. HARRIS]6144LOC[MR. HARRIS] So6145INso you6146PPyou do6147VVPdo n't6148RBn't ...6149:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]6150LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Would6151MDwould Oncale6152NPOncale have6153VHPhave come6154VVNcome out6155RPout differently6156RBdifferently if6157INif the6158DTthe employer6159NNemployer said6160VVDsay ,6161,, I6162PPI do6163VVPdo n't6164RBn't hire6165VVhire women6166NNSwoman to6167TOto work6168VVwork on6169INon platforms6170NNSplatform ,6171,, the6172DTthe only6173JJonly people6174NNSpeople I6175PPI hire6176VVPhire are6177VBPbe men6178NNSman ?6179SENT? [MR. HARRIS]6180LOC[MR. HARRIS] Well6181UHWell ,6182,, that6183WDTthat ...6184:... that6185WDTthat obviously6186RBobviously would6187MDwould have6188VHhave been6189VBNbe discriminatory6190JJdiscriminatory against6191INagainst the6192DTthe women6193NNSwoman seeking6194VVGseek ...6195:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]6196LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But6197CCbut it6198PPit 's6199VBZbe not6200RBnot ...6201:... [MR. HARRIS]6202LOC[MR. HARRIS] ...6203:... the6204DTthe job6205NNjob .6206SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]6207LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...6208:... the6209DTthe woman6210NNwoman who6211WPwho is6212VBZbe suing6213VVGsue ...6214:... [MR. HARRIS]6215LOC[MR. HARRIS] Right6216RBright .6217SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]6218LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...6219:... it6220PPit 's6221VBZbe the6222DTthe male6223NNmale who6224WPwho is6225VBZbe being6226VBGbe harassed6227VVNharass by6228INby other6229JJother men6230NNSman .6231SENT. And6232CCand the6233DTthe employer6234NNemployer 's6235POS's defense6236NNdefense is6237VBZbe ,6238,, you6239PPyou can6240MDcan 't6241RB't compare6242VVcompare what6243WPwhat I6244PPI 'm6245VBPbe doing6246VVGdo to6247TOto someone6248NNsomeone who6249WPwho discriminates6250VVZdiscriminate on6251INon the6252DTthe basis6253NNbasis of6254INof sex6255NNsex between6256INbetween men6257NNSman and6258CCand women6259NNSwoman because6260INbecause I6261PPI do6262VVPdo n't6263RBn't hire6264VVhire women6265NNSwoman at6266INat all6267DTall .6268SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6269LOC[MR. HARRIS] So6270INso it6271PPit 's6272VBZbe ,6273,, of6274INof course6275NNcourse ...6276:... it6277PPit 's6278VBZbe ...6279:... it6280PPit 's6281VBZbe not6282RBnot a6283DTa complete6284JJcomplete defense6285NNdefense or6286CCor even6287RBeven a6288DTa defense6289NNdefense to6290TOto say6291VVsay ,6292,, I6293PPI treat6294VVPtreat it6295PPit ...6296:... in6297INin cases6298NNScase like6299INlike Martin6300NPMartin ...6301:... like6302INlike Martin6303NPMartin Marietta6304NPMarietta ,6305,, it6306PPit was6307VBDbe not6308RBnot a6309DTa defense6310NNdefense for6311INfor that6312DTthat employer6313NNemployer to6314TOto say6315VVsay ,6316,, because6317INbecause I6318PPI hired6319VVDhire other6320JJother women6321NNSwoman ,6322,, it6323PPit excuses6324VVZexcuse this6325DTthis .6326SENT. So6327INso the6328DTthe answer6329NNanswer to6330TOto your6331PP$your question6332NNquestion is6333VBZbe that6334IN/thatthat would6335MDwould not6336RBnot be6337VBbe a6338DTa defense6339NNdefense .6340SENT. But6341CCbut ...6342:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]6343LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] That6344DTthat ...6345:... that6346WDTthat was6347VBDbe ...6348:... Martin6349NPMartin Marietta6350NPMarietta was6351VBDbe different6352JJdifferent because6353INbecause it6354PPit was6355VBDbe the6356DTthe plus6357NNplus .6358SENT. The6359DTthe plus6360NNplus applied6361VVNapply to6362TOto women6363NNSwoman and6364CCand did6365VVDdo n't6366RBn't apply6367VVapply to6368TOto men6369NNSman .6370SENT. So6371RBso you6372PPyou had6373VHDhave that6374DTthat distinction6375NNdistinction .6376SENT. Well6377UHwell ,6378,, take6379VVtake Price6380NPPrice Waterhouse6381NPWaterhouse .6382SENT. Suppose6383VVsuppose the6384DTthe employer6385NNemployer said6386VVDsay ,6387,, I6388PPI do6389VVPdo n't6390RBn't want6391VVwant any6392DTany men6393NNSman who6394WPwho are6395VBPbe not6396RBnot sufficiently6397RBsufficiently macho6398JJmacho ,6399,, and6400CCand I6401PPI do6402VVPdo n't6403RBn't want6404VVwant any6405DTany women6406NNSwoman who6407WPwho are6408VBPbe not6409RBnot sufficiently6410RBsufficiently feminine6411JJfeminine .6412SENT. If6413INif they6414PPthey ...6415:... the6416DTthe ...6417:... Price6418NPPrice Waterhouse6419NPWaterhouse said6420VVDsay we6421PPwe will6422MDwill treat6423VVtreat a6424DTa man6425NNman who6426WPwho is6427VBZbe n't6428RBn't sufficiently6429RBsufficiently macho6430JJmacho the6431DTthe same6432JJsame way6433NNway we6434PPwe treated6435VVDtreat Ann6436NPAnn Hopkins6437NPHopkins ,6438,, there6439EXthere would6440MDwould be6441VBbe ,6442,, as6443INas I6444PPI understand6445VVPunderstand your6446PP$your argument6447NNargument ,6448,, no6449DTno sex6450NNsex discrimination6451NNdiscrimination .6452SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6453LOC[MR. HARRIS] I6454PPI ...6455:... I6456PPI disagree6457VVPdisagree with6458INwith that6459DTthat ,6460,, Justice6461NPJustice Ginsburg6462NPGinsburg .6463SENT. The6464DTthe way6465NNway ...6466:... I6467PPI think6468VVPthink the6469DTthe best6470JJSgood way6471NNway to6472TOto think6473VVthink of6474INof Price6475NPPrice Waterhouse6476NPWaterhouse is6477VBZbe ,6478,, when6479WRBwhen an6480DTan employer6481NNemployer has6482VHZhave certain6483JJcertain traits6484NNStrait or6485CCor characteristics6486NNScharacteristic that6487IN/thatthat it6488PPit values6489VVZvalue in6490INin promotion6491NNpromotion and6492CCand hiring6493NNhiring and6494CCand discharge6495NNdischarge decisions6496NNSdecision ,6497,, there6498EXthere can6499MDcan 't6500RB't be6501VBbe a6502DTa list6503NNlist of6504INof criteria6505NNScriterion for6506INfor men6507NNSman and6508CCand a6509DTa list6510NNlist of6511INof criteria6512NNScriterion for6513INfor women6514NNSwoman .6515SENT. So6516INso the6517DTthe Solicitor6518NPSolicitor General6519NPGeneral offered6520VVDoffer the6521DTthe hypothetical6522JJhypothetical that6523IN/thatthat Your6524PP$your Honor6525NPHonor said6526VVDsay .6527SENT. And6528CCand ...6529:... and6530CCand in6531INin that6532DTthat situation6533NNsituation ,6534,, there6535EXthere would6536MDwould be6537VBbe two6538CDtwo sets6539NNSset of6540INof criteria6541NNScriterion .6542SENT. And6543CCand so6544RBso maybe6545RBmaybe both6546CCboth a6547DTa man6548NNman who6549WPwho does6550VVZdo n't6551RBn't meet6552VVmeet the6553DTthe women6554NNSwoman 's6555POS's criteria6556NNScriterion and6557CCand a6558DTa woman6559NNwoman who6560WPwho does6561VVZdo n't6562RBn't meet6563VVmeet the6564DTthe men6565NNSman 's6566POS's criteria6567NNScriterion would6568MDwould have6569VHhave a6570DTa claim6571NNclaim there6572RBthere .6573SENT. But6574CCbut ...6575:... but6576CCbut it6577PPit would6578MDwould n't6579RBn't be6580VBbe ...6581:... it6582PPit would6583MDwould not6584RBnot excuse6585VVexcuse it6586PPit just6587RBjust to6588TOto say6589VVsay that6590IN/thatthat there6591EXthere are6592VBPbe different6593JJdifferent criteria6594NNScriterion for6595INfor each6596DTeach set6597NNset .6598SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]6599LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Well6600UHWell ...6601:... [JUSTICE BREYER]6602LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Suppose6603VVsuppose ...6604:... suppose6605VVPsuppose a6606DTa Catholic6607NPCatholic ,6608,, Jew6609NPJew ,6610,, want6611VVPwant to6612TOto get6613VVget married6614JJmarried .6615SENT. Employer6616NNemployer fires6617VVZfire the6618DTthe Catholic6619NPCatholic .6620SENT. Why6621WRBwhy ?6622SENT? He6623PPhe 's6624VBZbe not6625RBnot against6626INagainst Catholics6627NPSCatholics .6628SENT. He6629PPhe 's6630VBZbe against6631INagainst intermarriage6632NNintermarriage .6633SENT. And6634CCand obviously6635RBobviously I6636PPI can6637MDcan use6638VVuse the6639DTthe same6640JJsame example6641NNexample with6642INwith race6643NNrace ,6644,, which6645WDTwhich is6646VBZbe famous6647JJfamous .6648SENT. I6649PPI take6650VVPtake it6651PPit from6652INfrom your6653PP$your argument6654NNargument that6655IN/thatthat there6656EXthere would6657MDwould be6658VBbe no6659DTno claim6660NNclaim ?6661SENT? [MR. HARRIS]6662LOC[MR. HARRIS] There6663RBthere would6664MDwould ,6665,, in6666INin fact6667NNfact ,6668,, be6669VBbe a6670DTa claim6671NNclaim ,6672,, in6673INin both6674DTboth ...6675:... [JUSTICE BREYER]6676LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Why6677WRBwhy ?6678SENT? [MR. HARRIS]6679LOC[MR. HARRIS] ...6680:... situations6681NNSsituation .6682SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]6683LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Why6684NPWhy ?6685SENT? Why6686WRBwhy ?6687SENT? All6688DTall right6689NNright .6690SENT. If6691INif there6692EXthere is6693VBZbe a6694DTa claim6695NNclaim there6696RBthere ,6697,, why6698WRBwhy is6699VBZbe n't6700RBn't there6701RBthere here6702RBhere ?6703SENT? [MR. HARRIS]6704LOC[MR. HARRIS] So6705RBso in6706INin the6707DTthe race6708NNrace context6709NNcontext ,6710,, the6711DTthe only6712JJonly difference6713NNdifference between6714INbetween ...6715:... [JUSTICE BREYER]6716LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I6717PPI did6718VVDdo n't6719RBn't say6720VVsay race6721NNrace .6722SENT. I6723PPI said6724VVDsay religion6725NNreligion .6726SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6727LOC[MR. HARRIS] Right6728RBright .6729SENT. In6730RBin ...6731:... in6732INin the6733DTthe ...6734:... in6735INin the6736DTthe context6737NNcontext of6738INof religion6739NNreligion ,6740,, which6741WDTwhich first6742JJfirst of6743INof all6744DTall religion6745NNreligion is6746VBZbe defined6747VVNdefine ...6748:... is6749VBZbe the6750DTthe only6751JJonly one6752CDone other6753JJother than6754INthan pregnancy6755NNpregnancy which6756WDTwhich has6757VHZhave an6758DTan expansive6759JJexpansive definition6760NNdefinition .6761SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]6762LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No6763NPNo ...6764:... [MR. HARRIS]6765LOC[MR. HARRIS] Yes6766NPYes ,6767,, it6768PPit would6769MDwould be6770VBbe religious6771JJreligious discrimination6772NNdiscrimination because6773INbecause between6774INbetween a6775DTa couple6776NNcouple that6777WDTthat is6778VBZbe Catholic6779JJCatholic and6780CCand Jewish6781JJJewish and6782CCand two6783CDtwo Catholics6784NPSCatholics ,6785,, the6786DTthe only6787JJonly difference6788NNdifference between6789INbetween those6790DTthose couples6791NNScouple is6792VBZbe their6793PP$their religion6794NNreligion .6795SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]6796LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And6797CCand the6798DTthe only6799JJonly difference6800NNdifference between6801INbetween the6802DTthe two6803CDtwo couples6804NNScouple here6805RBhere is6806VBZbe that6807IN/thatthat one6808PPone is6809VBZbe a6810DTa man6811NNman rather6812RBrather than6813INthan the6814DTthe woman6815NNwoman .6816SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6817LOC[MR. HARRIS] Except6818INexcept that6819WDTthat it6820PPit also6821RBalso introduces6822VVZintroduce an6823DTan independent6824JJindependent characteristic6825NNcharacteristic ,6826,, which6827WDTwhich can6828MDcan be6829VBbe completely6830RBcompletely ...6831:... [JUSTICE BREYER]6832LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] All6833DTall right6834NNright .6835SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6836LOC[MR. HARRIS] ...6837:... neutral6838JJneutral to6839TOto men6840NNSman ...6841:... [JUSTICE BREYER]6842LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] So6843RBso does6844VVZdo it6845PPit there6846RBthere ...6847:... why6848WRBwhy I6849PPI 'm6850VBPbe not6851RBnot against6852INagainst Catholics6853NPSCatholics ,6854,, I6855PPI am6856VBPbe not6857RBnot against6858INagainst Jews6859NNSJew ,6860,, I6861PPI am6862VBPbe against6863INagainst inter-marriage6864NNinter-marriage ?6865SENT? [MR. HARRIS]6866LOC[MR. HARRIS] I6867PPI ...6868:... if6869INif ...6870:... if6871INif that6872DTthat person6873NNperson or6874CCor actor6875NNactor exists6876VVZexist ,6877,, I6878PPI think6879VVPthink it6880PPit 's6881VBZbe foreign6882JJforeign to6883TOto our6884PP$our ...6885:... [JUSTICE BREYER]6886LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Oh6887UHoh ,6888,, it6889PPit exists6890VVZexist .6891SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6892LOC[MR. HARRIS] ...6893:... case6894NNcase law6895NNlaw .6896SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]6897LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I6898PPI promise6899VVPpromise you6900PPyou .6901SENT. There6902EXthere are6903VBPbe many6904JJmany people6905NNSpeople ,6906,, at6907INat least6908JJSleast in6909INin the6910DTthe religious6911JJreligious context6912NNcontext ,6913,, who6914WPwho are6915VBPbe against6916INagainst inter-marriage6917NNinter-marriage and6918CCand are6919VBPbe not6920RBnot against6921INagainst Catholics6922NPSCatholics or6923CCor Jews6924NPSJews .6925SENT. That6926DTthat 's6927VBZbe not6928RBnot an6929DTan unrealistic6930JJunrealistic example6931NNexample .6932SENT. And6933CCand all6934RBall I6935PPI find6936VVPfind in6937INin that6938DTthat example6939NNexample is6940VBZbe an6941DTan identical6942JJidentical case6943NNcase to6944TOto this6945DTthis one6946CDone .6947SENT. [MR. HARRIS]6948LOC[MR. HARRIS] And6949CCand I6950PPI ...6951:... I6952PPI think6953VVPthink that6954DTthat ...6955:... I6956PPI do6957VVPdo think6958VVthink that6959IN/thatthat most6960JJSmost of6961INof the6962DTthe ...6963:... most6964JJSmost people6965NNSpeople who6966WPwho would6967MDwould oppose6968VVoppose any6969DTany sort6970NNsort of6971INof interreligious6972JJinterreligious marriage6973NNmarriage would6974MDwould do6975VVdo so6976RBso for6977INfor religious6978JJreligious reasons6979NNSreason .6980SENT. And6981CCand I6982PPI would6983MDwould also6984RBalso note6985VVnote in6986INin the6987DTthe ...6988:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]6989LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Mr6990NPMr .6991SENT. Harris6992NPHarris ,6993,, I6994PPI think6995VVPthink ...6996:... I6997PPI think6998VVPthink what6999WPwhat all7000DTall of7001INof these7002DTthese hypotheticals7003NNShypotheticals are7004VBPbe about7005RBabout is7006VBZbe that7007IN/thatthat in7008INin many7009JJmany of7010INof our7011PP$our cases7012NNScase ,7013,, what7014WPwhat you7015PPyou find7016VVPfind is7017VBZbe what7018WPwhat you7019PPyou said7020VVDsay ,7021,, what7022WPwhat did7023VVDdo you7024PPyou say7025VVPsay ,7026,, independent7027JJindependent characteristics7028NNScharacteristic ?7029SENT? They7030PPthey 're7031VBPbe all7032RBall over7033INover our7034PP$our cases7035NNScase .7036SENT. If7037INif you7038PPyou take7039VVPtake Manhart7040NPManhart ,7041,, which7042WDTwhich is7043VBZbe the7044DTthe seminal7045JJseminal case7046NNcase ,7047,, Manhart7048NPManhart was7049VBDbe all7050RBall about7051INabout an7052DTan independent7053JJindependent characteristic7054NNcharacteristic .7055SENT. It7056PPit was7057VBDbe about7058INabout life7059NNlife expectancy7060NNexpectancy .7061SENT. But7062CCbut we7063PPwe did7064VVDdo n't7065RBn't say7066VVsay ,7067,, oh7068UHoh ,7069,, we7070PPwe 're7071VBPbe going7072VVGgo into7073INinto some7074DTsome different7075JJdifferent sort7076NNsort of7077INof analysis7078NNanalysis where7079WRBwhere we7080PPwe do7081VVPdo n't7082RBn't just7083RBjust say7084VVPsay would7085MDwould the7086DTthe same7087JJsame thing7088NNthing have7089VHPhave happened7090VVNhappen to7091TOto you7092PPyou if7093INif you7094PPyou were7095VBDbe a7096DTa man7097NNman or7098CCor would7099MDwould the7100DTthe same7101JJsame thing7102NNthing have7103VHPhave happened7104VVNhappen to7105TOto you7106PPyou if7107INif you7108PPyou were7109VBDbe a7110DTa woman7111NNwoman ,7112,, because7113INbecause we7114PPwe had7115VHDhave an7116DTan independent7117JJindependent characteristic7118NNcharacteristic ,7119,, which7120WDTwhich was7121VBDbe life7122NNlife expectancy7123NNexpectancy .7124SENT. [MR. HARRIS]7125LOC[MR. HARRIS] Right7126NPRight .7127SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7128LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] And7129CCand ...7130:... and7131CCand so7132RBso the7133DTthe same7134JJsame thing7135NNthing here7136RBhere .7137SENT. So7138RBso all7139RBall of7140INof these7141DTthese hypotheticals7142NNShypotheticals are7143VBPbe really7144RBreally about7145INabout the7146DTthe same7147JJsame thing7148NNthing ,7149,, which7150WDTwhich is7151VBZbe that7152IN/thatthat Manhart7153NPManhart gave7154VVDgive us7155PPus a7156DTa very7157RBvery simple7158JJsimple test7159NNtest ,7160,, and7161CCand Manhart7162NPManhart said7163VVDsay ,7164,, what7165WPwhat you7166PPyou do7167VVPdo when7168WRBwhen you7169PPyou look7170VVPlook to7171TOto see7172VVsee whether7173INwhether there7174EXthere is7175VBZbe discrimination7176NNdiscrimination under7177INunder Title7178NPTitle VII7179NPVII is7180VBZbe ,7181,, you7182PPyou say7183VVPsay ,7184,, would7185MDwould the7186DTthe same7187JJsame thing7188NNthing have7189VHPhave happened7190VVNhappen to7191TOto you7192PPyou if7193INif you7194PPyou were7195VBDbe of7196INof a7197DTa different7198JJdifferent sex7199NNsex ?7200SENT? And7201CCand ,7202,, Ms7203NNMs .7204SENT. Karlan7205NPKarlan made7206VVDmake all7207PDTall the7208DTthe ...7209:... you7210PPyou know7211VVPknow ,7212,, went7213VVDgo through7214INthrough all7215PDTall the7216DTthe ways7217NNSway in7218INin which7219WDTwhich ,7220,, obviously7221RBobviously ,7222,, the7223DTthe ...7224:... the7225DTthe same7226JJsame thing7227NNthing would7228MDwould not7229RBnot have7230VHhave happened7231VVNhappen to7232TOto you7233PPyou if7234INif you7235PPyou were7236VBDbe a7237DTa different7238JJdifferent sex7239NNsex ,7240,, you7241PPyou being7242VBGbe her7243PP$her client7244NNclient .7245SENT. So7246RBso ,7247,, I7248PPI mean7249VVPmean ,7250,, that7251WDTthat 's7252VBZbe the7253DTthe question7254NNquestion .7255SENT. There7256EXthere are7257VBPbe independent7258JJindependent characteristics7259NNScharacteristic in7260INin all7261PDTall these7262DTthese cases7263NNScase .7264SENT. We7265PPwe have7266VHPhave insisted7267VVNinsist on7268INon this7269DTthis extremely7270RBextremely simple7271JJsimple test7272NNtest .7273SENT. If7274INif you7275PPyou apply7276VVPapply that7277DTthat test7278NNtest ,7279,, I7280PPI guess7281VVPguess it7282PPit seems7283VVZseem to7284TOto come7285VVcome out7286RPout against7287INagainst you7288PPyou .7289SENT. [MR. HARRIS]7290LOC[MR. HARRIS] A7291DTa couple7292NNcouple things7293NNSthing .7294SENT. First7295RBfirst ,7296,, let7297VVlet me7298PPme address7299VVaddress Manhart7300NPManhart and7301CCand then7302RBthen address7303VVaddress ...7304:... address7305VVaddress the7306DTthe test7307NNtest more7308RBRmore generally7309RBgenerally .7310SENT. So7311RBso in7312INin Manhart7313NPManhart ,7314,, this7315DTthis Court7316NPCourt noted7317VVDnote that7318IN/thatthat the7319DTthe ...7320:... the7321DTthe policy7322NNpolicy was7323VBDbe n't7324RBn't just7325RBjust about7326INabout longevity7327NNlongevity .7328SENT. That7329DTthat ...7330:... that7331DTthat employer7332NNemployer made7333VVDmake no7334DTno attempt7335NNattempt to7336TOto do7337VVdo any7338DTany sort7339NNsort of7340INof bona7341NNbona fide7342NNfide underwriting7343NNunderwriting or7344CCor life7345NNlife expectancy7346NNexpectancy estimates7347NNSestimate .7348SENT. It7349PPit simply7350RBsimply charged7351VVDcharge the7352DTthe women7353NNSwoman more7354RBRmore .7355SENT. So7356RBso even7357RBeven a7358DTa woman7359NNwoman and7360CCand a7361DTa man7362NNman ,7363,, if7364INif they7365PPthey each7366RBeach had7367VHDhave a7368DTa 75-year7369JJ75-year life7370NNlife expectancy7371NNexpectancy ,7372,, they7373PPthey would7374MDwould be7375VBbe charged7376VVNcharge different7377JJdifferent rates7378NNSrate ,7379,, even7380RBeven though7381INthough they7382PPthey were7383VBDbe totally7384RBtotally ,7385,, similarly7386RBsimilarly situated7387VVNsituate with7388INwith respect7389NNrespect to7390TOto that7391DTthat .7392SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7393LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Yes7394NPYes ,7395,, but7396CCbut Manhart7397NPManhart was7398VBDbe very7399RBvery clear7400JJclear that7401IN/thatthat women7402NNSwoman in7403INin the7404DTthe aggregate7405NNaggregate were7406VBDbe probably7407RBprobably going7408VVGgo to7409TOto be7410VBbe fine7411JJfine under7412INunder this7413DTthis policy7414NNpolicy ,7415,, because7416INbecause women7417NNSwoman in7418INin the7419DTthe aggregate7420NNaggregate do7421VVPdo have7422VHhave a7423DTa higher7424JJRhigh life7425NNlife expectancy7426NNexpectancy .7427SENT. I7428PPI mean7429VVPmean ,7430,, I7431PPI think7432VVPthink actually7433RBactually Manhart7434NPManhart makes7435VVZmake clear7436JJclear why7437WRBwhy another7438DTanother aspect7439NNaspect of7440INof your7441PP$your argument7442NNargument is7443VBZbe ...7444:... is7445VBZbe wrong7446JJwrong ,7447,, because7448INbecause you7449PPyou say7450VVPsay ,7451,, well7452RBwell ,7453,, we7454PPwe have7455VHPhave to7456TOto look7457VVlook at7458INat these7459DTthese big7460JJbig classes7461NNSclass .7462SENT. Well7463UHwell ,7464,, there7465EXthere was7466VBDbe nothing7467NNnothing wrong7468JJwrong in7469INin Manhart7470NPManhart when7471WRBwhen you7472PPyou looked7473VVDlook at7474INat big7475JJbig classes7476NNSclass .7477SENT. What7478WPWhat became7479VVDbecome wrong7480JJwrong in7481INin Manhart7482NPManhart was7483VBDbe when7484WRBwhen you7485PPyou looked7486VVDlook at7487INat individuals7488NNSindividual .7489SENT. And7490CCand when7491WRBwhen you7492PPyou look7493VVPlook at7494INat individuals7495NNSindividual ,7496,, which7497WDTwhich Manhart7498NPManhart insisted7499VVDinsist one7500PPone do7501VVPdo ,7502,, one7503PPone should7504MDshould do7505VVdo ,7506,, and7507CCand when7508WRBwhen you7509PPyou apply7510VVPapply the7511DTthe test7512NNtest that7513IN/thatthat Manhart7514NPManhart insisted7515VVDinsist you7516PPyou apply7517VVPapply ,7518,, would7519MDwould this7520DTthis woman7521NNwoman have7522VHPhave been7523VBNbe treated7524VVNtreat differently7525RBdifferently if7526INif she7527PPshe were7528VBDbe a7529DTa man7530NNman ?7531SENT? The7532DTthe answer7533NNanswer was7534VBDbe yes7535RByes .7536SENT. And7537CCand ,7538,, similarly7539RBsimilarly ,7540,, I7541PPI guess7542VVPguess I7543PPI 'm7544VBPbe just7545RBjust going7546VVGgo to7547TOto ask7548VVask you7549PPyou again7550RBagain ,7551,, if7552INif you7553PPyou applied7554VVDapply that7555DTthat test7556NNtest ,7557,, do7558VVPdo n't7559RBn't you7560PPyou lose7561VVPlose ?7562SENT? And7563CCand if7564INif you7565PPyou do7566VVPdo lose7567VVlose ,7568,, why7569WRBwhy should7570MDshould we7571PPwe not7572RBnot apply7573VVPapply that7574DTthat test7575NNtest ?7576SENT? [MR. HARRIS]7577LOC[MR. HARRIS] Here7578RBhere 's7579VBZbe the7580DTthe problem7581NNproblem with7582INwith the7583DTthe test7584NNtest .7585SENT. In7586INin Manhart7587NPManhart ,7588,, in7589INin Newport7590NPNewport News7591NPNews ,7592,, in7593INin Martin7594NPMartin Marietta7595NPMarietta ,7596,, the7597DTthe comparator7598NNcomparator test7599NNtest makes7600VVZmake perfect7601JJperfect sense7602NNsense because7603INbecause you7604PPyou know7605VVPknow exactly7606RBexactly what7607WPwhat you7608PPyou 're7609VBPbe testing7610VVGtest for7611INfor ,7612,, so7613RBso the7614DTthe comparator7615NNcomparator helps7616VVZhelp you7617PPyou draw7618VVdraw inferences7619NNSinference from7620INfrom the7621DTthe evidence7622NNevidence .7623SENT. The7624DTthe problem7625NNproblem here7626RBhere is7627VBZbe ,7628,, unless7629INunless the7630DTthe Plaintiffs7631NNSplaintiff can7632MDcan point7633VVpoint to7634TOto something7635NNsomething outside7636INoutside the7637DTthe comparator7638NNcomparator to7639TOto tell7640VVtell us7641PPus why7642WRBwhy we7643PPwe need7644VVPneed to7645TOto hold7646VVhold sexual7647JJsexual orientation7648NNorientation ...7649:... to7650TOto ...7651:... to7652TOto tell7653VVtell us7654PPus why7655WRBwhy that7656DTthat is7657VBZbe irrelevant7658JJirrelevant ,7659,, they7660PPthey 're7661VBPbe ...7662:... they7663PPthey 're7664VBPbe just7665RBjust assuming7666VVGassume their7667PP$their conclusion7668NNconclusion .7669SENT. So7670INso their7671PP$their comparator7672NNcomparator would7673MDwould say7674VVsay ,7675,, you7676PPyou would7677MDwould ask7678VVask if7679INif a7680DTa gay7681JJgay man7682NNman has7683VHZhave suffered7684VVNsuffer sex7685NNsex discrimination7686NNdiscrimination by7687INby comparing7688VVGcompare him7689PPhim to7690TOto a7691DTa heterosexual7692JJheterosexual woman7693NNwoman ,7694,, which7695WDTwhich that7696DTthat version7697NNversion of7698INof the7699DTthe comparator7700NNcomparator can7701MDcan 't7702RB't isolate7703NNisolate if7704INif it7705PPit 's7706VBZbe the7707DTthe sex7708NNsex or7709CCor the7710DTthe sexual7711JJsexual orientation7712NNorientation .7713SENT. And7714CCand so7715RBso I7716PPI do7717VVPdo think7718VVthink ,7719,, unless7720INunless they7721PPthey can7722MDcan point7723VVpoint to7724TOto something7725NNsomething outside7726INoutside the7727DTthe comparator7728NNcomparator ,7729,, to7730TOto justify7731VVjustify putting7732VVGput sexual7733JJsexual orientation7734NNorientation off7735INoff limits7736NNSlimit ...7737:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]7738LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well7739UHWell ...7740:... [MR. HARRIS]7741LOC[MR. HARRIS] ...7742:... the7743DTthe comparator7744NNcomparator does7745VVZdo n't7746RBn't ...7747:... does7748VVZdo n't7749RBn't answer7750VVanswer the7751DTthe ultimate7752JJultimate question7753NNquestion .7754SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]7755LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well7756UHwell ,7757,, it7758PPit certainly7759RBcertainly may7760MDmay not7761RBnot answer7762VVanswer ...7763:... isolate7764VVisolate the7765DTthe sole7766JJsole or7767CCor proximate7768JJproximate cause7769NNcause ,7770,, but7771CCbut I7772PPI ...7773:... I7774PPI think7775VVPthink the7776DTthe ...7777:... the7778DTthe argument7779NNargument on7780INon the7781DTthe other7782JJother side7783NNside is7784VBZbe the7785DTthe language7786NNlanguage of7787INof the7788DTthe statute7789NNstatute has7790VHZhave a7791DTa but-for7792NNbut-for causation7793NNcausation standard7794NNstandard ,7795,, a7796DTa more7797RBRmore generous7798JJgenerous causation7799NNcausation standard7800NNstandard .7801SENT. So7802RBso perhaps7803RBperhaps there7804EXthere are7805VBPbe two7806CDtwo causal7807JJcausal factors7808NNSfactor at7809INat work7810NNwork here7811RBhere .7812SENT. But7813CCbut is7814VBZbe n't7815RBn't one7816CDone of7817INof them7818PPthem sex7819NNsex in7820INin the7821DTthe narrow7822JJnarrow sense7823NNsense of7824INof ...7825:... of7826INof ...7827:... of7828INof biological7829JJbiological gender7830NNgender ?7831SENT? What's7832NNSWhat's ...7833:... what7834WPwhat 's7835VBZbe your7836PP$your response7837NNresponse to7838TOto that7839DTthat ?7840SENT? [MR. HARRIS]7841LOC[MR. HARRIS] Yeah7842NPYeah .7843SENT. So7844RBso in7845INin the7846DTthe ...7847:... what7848WPwhat I7849PPI 'm7850VBPbe arguing7851VVGargue is7852VBZbe simply7853RBsimply that7854DTthat sexual7855JJsexual orientation7856NNorientation standing7857NNstanding alone7858RBalone is7859VBZbe not7860RBnot ,7861,, without7862INwithout more7863JJRmore ,7864,, sex7865NNsex discrimination7866NNdiscrimination .7867SENT. And7868CCand so7869RBso the7870DTthe ...7871:... I7872PPI 'm7873VBPbe sorry7874JJsorry ,7875,, remind7876VVremind me7877PPme of7878INof the7879DTthe question7880NNquestion one7881CDone more7882JJRmore time7883NNtime ?7884SENT? [JUSTICE GORSUCH]7885LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Sure7886NPSure .7887SENT. So7888INso the7889DTthe ...7890:... [MR. HARRIS]7891LOC[MR. HARRIS] Right7892RBright .7893SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]7894LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Your7895PP$your ...7896:... your7897PP$your response7898NNresponse to7899TOto Justice7900NPJustice Kagan7901NPKagan was7902VBDbe ,7903,, I7904PPI need7905VVPneed to7906TOto focus7907VVfocus on7908INon sexual7909JJsexual orientation7910NNorientation because7911INbecause that7912WDTthat 's7913VBZbe the7914DTthe sole7915JJsole or7916CCor primary7917JJprimary causal7918JJcausal factor7919NNfactor here7920RBhere for7921INfor the7922DTthe firing7923NNfiring .7924SENT. And7925CCand I7926PPI think7927VVPthink the7928DTthe response7929NNresponse from7930INfrom the7931DTthe other7932JJother side7933NNside is7934VBZbe :7935:: But7936CCbut the7937DTthe statute7938NNstatute has7939VHZhave a7940DTa more7941RBRmore generous7942JJgenerous causal7943JJcausal ...7944:... [MR. HARRIS]7945LOC[MR. HARRIS] Okay7946NPOkay .7947SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]7948LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...7949:... formulation7950NNformulation ,7951,, a7952DTa but-for7953NNbut-for causal7954JJcausal formulation7955NNformulation ,7956,, so7957RBso perhaps7958RBperhaps you7959PPyou 're7960VBPbe right7961JJright that7962IN/thatthat ,7963,, at7964INat some7965DTsome level7966NNlevel ,7967,, sexual7968JJsexual orientation7969NNorientation is7970VBZbe surely7971RBsurely in7972INin ...7973:... in7974INin play7975NNplay here7976RBhere .7977SENT. But7978CCbut is7979VBZbe n't7980RBn't sex7981NNsex also7982RBalso in7983INin play7984VVplay here7985RBhere because7986INbecause of7987INof the7988DTthe change7989NNchange of7990INof the7991DTthe first7992JJfirst variable7993NNvariable ?7994SENT? [MR. HARRIS]7995LOC[MR. HARRIS] Right7996RBright .7997SENT. So7998RBso I7999PPI think8000VVPthink ...8001:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]8002LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] And8003CCand is8004VBZbe n't8005RBn't that8006DTthat enough8007NNenough ?8008SENT? It8009PPit ...8010:... you8011PPyou know8012VVPknow ,8013,, the8014DTthe statute8015NNstatute talks8016NNStalk about8017INabout a8018DTa material8019JJmaterial causal8020JJcausal factor8021NNfactor or8022CCor some8023DTsome formulation8024NNformulation like8025INlike that8026DTthat ,8027,, not8028RBnot the8029DTthe sole8030JJsole cause8031NNcause ,8032,, not8033RBnot the8034DTthe proximate8035JJproximate cause8036NNcause ,8037,, but8038CCbut a8039DTa cause8040NNcause .8041SENT. And8042CCand one8043PPone ...8044:... one8045PPone would8046MDwould ...8047:... in8048INin what8049WPwhat ...8050:... in8051INin what8052WPwhat linguistic8053JJlinguistic formulation8054NNformulation would8055MDwould one8056CDone ...8057:... would8058MDwould one8059PPone say8060VVsay that8061DTthat sex8062NNsex ,8063,, biological8064JJbiological gender8065NNgender ,8066,, has8067VHZhave nothing8068NNnothing to8069TOto do8070VVdo with8071INwith what8072WPwhat happened8073VVDhappen in8074INin this8075DTthis case8076NNcase ?8077SENT? [MR. HARRIS]8078LOC[MR. HARRIS] Yes8079NPYes ,8080,, Your8081PP$your Honor8082NPHonor .8083SENT. So8084RBso what8085WPwhat you8086PPyou 're8087VBPbe referring8088VVGrefer to8089TOto ,8090,, I8091PPI believe8092VVPbelieve ,8093,, is8094VBZbe the8095DTthe motivating8096VVGmotivate factor8097NNfactor language8098NNlanguage .8099SENT. And8100CCand so8101RBso ,8102,, in8103INin what8104WPwhat I8105PPI just8106RBjust referred8107VVDrefer to8108TOto as8109INas the8110DTthe sort8111NNsort of8112INof benchmark8113JJbenchmark scenario8114NNscenario ,8115,, sex8116NNsex would8117MDwould not8118RBnot be8119VBbe a8120DTa motivating8121VVGmotivate factor8122NNfactor there8123RBthere .8124SENT. If8125INif you8126PPyou look8127VVPlook at8128INat Mr8129NPMr .8130SENT. Bostock8131NPBostock 's8132POS's complaint8133NNcomplaint ,8134,, for8135INfor example8136NNexample ,8137,, and8138CCand you8139PPyou strip8140VVstrip out8141RPout any8142DTany mention8143NNmention of8144INof his8145PP$his sex8146NNsex as8147INas being8148VBGbe a8149DTa man8150NNman ,8151,, again8152RBagain ,8153,, we8154PPwe ...8155:... we8156PPwe dispute8157VVPdispute the8158DTthe allegations8159NNSallegation ,8160,, of8161INof course8162NNcourse ,8163,, but8164CCbut it8165PPit would8166MDwould still8167RBstill make8168VVmake perfect8169JJperfect sense8170NNsense .8171SENT. But8172CCbut if8173INif you8174PPyou stripped8175VVDstrip out8176RPout any8177DTany reference8178NNreference to8179TOto his8180PP$his sexual8181JJsexual orientation8182NNorientation ,8183,, it8184PPit would8185MDwould make8186VVmake little8187RBlittle ,8188,, if8189INif any8190DTany ,8191,, sense8192NNsense .8193SENT. And8194CCand so8195RBso in8196INin Price8197NPPrice Waterhouse8198NPWaterhouse ,8199,, this8200DTthis Court8201NPCourt helped8202VVDhelp give8203VVgive guidance8204NNguidance about8205INabout how8206WRBhow to8207TOto do8208VVdo the8209DTthe motivating8210VVGmotivate factor8211NNfactor analysis8212NNanalysis and8213CCand said8214VVDsay imagine8215VVimagine you8216PPyou gave8217VVDgive the8218DTthe employer8219NNemployer truth8220NNtruth serum8221NNserum and8222CCand said8223VVDsay what8224WPwhat were8225VBDbe your8226PP$your true8227JJtrue reasons8228NNSreason for8229INfor doing8230VVGdo this8231DTthis ?8232SENT? Would8233MDwould one8234PPone of8235INof them8236PPthem be8237VBbe the8238DTthe characteristic8239NNcharacteristic ?8240SENT? And8241CCand what8242WPwhat I8243PPI would8244MDwould call8245VVcall that8246DTthat ...8247:... that8248DTthat benchmark8249JJbenchmark scenario8250NNscenario ...8251:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]8252LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] All8253DTall right8254NNright ,8255,, let8256VVNlet 's8257POS's ...8258:... [MR. HARRIS]8259LOC[MR. HARRIS] ...8260:... sex8261NNsex would8262MDwould not8263RBnot be8264VBbe ...8265:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]8266LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Let8267VVlet 's8268VBZbe do8269VVdo truth8270NNtruth serum8271NNserum ,8272,, okay8273JJokay ?8274SENT? Wouldn't8275NNWouldn't ...8276:... would8277MDwould n't8278RBn't the8279DTthe employer8280NNemployer maybe8281RBmaybe say8282VVPsay it8283PPit 's8284VBZbe because8285INbecause this8286DTthis was8287VBDbe ...8288:... this8289DTthis person8290NNperson was8291VBDbe a8292DTa man8293NNman who8294WPwho liked8295VVDlike other8296JJother men8297NNSman ?8298SENT? And8299CCand is8300VBZbe n't8301RBn't that8302DTthat first8303JJfirst part8304NNpart sex8305NNsex ?8306SENT? [MR. HARRIS]8307LOC[MR. HARRIS] Your8308PP$your Honor8309NPHonor ,8310,, I8311PPI think8312VVPthink in8313INin common8314JJcommon parlance8315NNparlance ,8316,, we8317PPwe would8318MDwould call8319VVcall that8320IN/thatthat a8321DTa same-sex8322NNsame-sex attraction8323NNattraction .8324SENT. And8325CCand I8326PPI want8327VVPwant to8328TOto be8329VBbe clear8330JJclear ,8331,, if8332INif there8333EXthere is8334VBZbe some8335DTsome reason8336NNreason to8337TOto think8338VVthink that8339DTthat employer8340NNemployer ...8341:... and8342CCand some8343DTsome of8344INof the8345DTthe amicus8346NNamicus briefs8347NNSbrief say8348VVPsay that8349IN/thatthat much8350JJmuch discrimination8351NNdiscrimination against8352INagainst gay8353JJgay and8354CCand lesbian8355JJlesbian people8356NNSpeople is8357VBZbe ...8358:... is8359VBZbe based8360VVNbase on8361INon sort8362NNsort of8363INof animus8364NNanimus against8365INagainst gay8366JJgay men8367NNSman or8368CCor lesbian8369JJlesbian women8370NNSwoman .8371SENT. If8372INif there8373EXthere 's8374VBZbe some8375DTsome reason8376NNreason to8377TOto believe8378VVbelieve that8379IN/thatthat in8380INin that8381DTthat scenario8382NNscenario ,8383,, then8384RBthen that8385DTthat may8386MDmay well8387RBwell be8388VBbe a8389DTa motivating8390VVGmotivate factor8391NNfactor ,8392,, but8393CCbut when8394WRBwhen you8395PPyou simply8396RBsimply have8397VHPhave an8398DTan employee8399NNemployee saying8400VVGsay I8401PPI was8402VBDbe fired8403VVNfire because8404INbecause of8405INof my8406PP$my sexual8407JJsexual orientation8408NNorientation ,8409,, that8410WDTthat alone8411RBalone does8412VVZdo not8413RBnot show8414VVshow that8415DTthat ...8416:... what8417WPwhat ...8418:... what8419WPwhat this8420DTthis Court8421NPCourt called8422VVDcall in8423INin Oncale8424NPOncale the8425DTthe critical8426JJcritical ...8427:... critical8428JJcritical issue8429NNissue of8430INof distinguishing8431VVGdistinguish between8432INbetween men8433NNSman and8434CCand women8435NNSwoman .8436SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8437LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Are8438VBPbe you8439PPyou drawing8440VVGdraw a8441DTa distinction8442NNdistinction between8443INbetween the8444DTthe literal8445JJliteral meaning8446NNmeaning of8447INof "8448``" because8449INbecause of8450INof sex8451NNsex "8452''" and8453CCand the8454DTthe ordinary8455JJordinary meaning8456NNmeaning of8457INof "8458``" because8459INbecause of8460INof sex8461NNsex "8462''" ?8463SENT? And8464CCand ,8465,, if8466INif so8467RBso ,8468,, how8469WRBhow are8470VBPbe we8471PPwe supposed8472VVNsuppose to8473TOto think8474VVthink about8475INabout ordinary8476JJordinary meaning8477NNmeaning in8478INin this8479DTthis case8480NNcase ?8481SENT? [MR. HARRIS]8482LOC[MR. HARRIS] I8483PPI do8484VVPdo n't8485RBn't see8486VVsee a8487DTa difference8488NNdifference between8489INbetween the8490DTthe two8491CDtwo as8492RBas far8493RBfar as8494RBas ...8495:... and8496CCand ...8497:... and8498CCand the8499DTthe last8500JJlast point8501NNpoint ,8502,, running8503VVGrun out8504RPout of8505INof time8506NNtime ,8507,, I8508PPI think8509VVPthink to8510TOto go8511VVgo back8512RBback to8513TOto some8514DTsome of8515INof the8516DTthe questions8517NNSquestion about8518INabout bathrooms8519NNSbathroom and8520CCand fitness8521NNfitness standards8522NNSstandard ,8523,, I8524PPI want8525VVPwant to8526TOto be8527VBbe clear8528JJclear ,8529,, under8530INunder the8531DTthe Plaintiff8532NNplaintiff 's8533POS's simple8534JJsimple but-for8535NNbut-for test8536NNtest ,8537,, if8538INif you8539PPyou truly8540RBtruly simply8541RBsimply apply8542VVapply the8543DTthe Manhart8544NPManhart test8545NNtest or8546CCor ...8547:... in8548INin the8549DTthe way8550NNway they8551PPthey want8552VVPwant to8553TOto do8554VVdo it8555PPit ,8556,, I8557PPI do8558VVPdo n't8559RBn't see8560VVsee any8561DTany way8562NNway that8563IN/thatthat single-sex8564NNsingle-sex bathrooms8565NNSbathroom or8566CCor showering8567VVGshower facilities8568NNSfacility ...8569:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]8570LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] You8571PPyou have8572VHPhave to8573TOto have8574VHhave someone8575NNsomeone who8576WPwho 's8577VBZbe injured8578VVNinjure .8579SENT. You8580PPyou have8581VHPhave to8582TOto have8583VHhave someone8584NNsomeone who8585WPwho 's8586VBZbe injured8587VVNinjure .8588SENT. And8589CCand the8590DTthe response8591NNresponse to8592TOto the8593DTthe bathrooms8594NNSbathroom is8595VBZbe who8596WPwho is8597VBZbe the8598DTthe complaining8599VVGcomplain plaintiff8600NNplaintiff ?8601SENT? And8602CCand for8603INfor most8604JJSmost people8605NNSpeople ,8606,, they8607PPthey would8608MDwould not8609RBnot be8610VBbe complaining8611VVGcomplain plaintiff8612NNplaintiff .8613SENT. They8614PPthey would8615MDwould not8616RBnot be8617VBbe eligible8618JJeligible because8619INbecause they8620PPthey 're8621VBPbe not8622RBnot injured8623VVNinjure by8624INby the8625DTthe separate8626JJseparate bathrooms8627NNSbathroom .8628SENT. In8629INin fact8630NNfact ,8631,, they8632PPthey like8633VVPlike it8634PPit .8635SENT. [MR. HARRIS]8636LOC[MR. HARRIS] Yes8637NPYes ,8638,, Your8639PP$your Honor8640NPHonor ,8641,, although8642INalthough ,8643,, of8644INof course8645NNcourse ,8646,, if8647INif someone8648NNsomeone ,8649,, for8650INfor example8651NNexample ,8652,, is8653VBZbe fired8654VVNfire ,8655,, imagine8656VVimagine a8657DTa factory8658NNfactory with8659INwith hazardous8660JJhazardous materials8661NNSmaterial where8662WRBwhere people8663NNSpeople shower8664VVPshower after8665INafter work8666NNwork and8667CCand to8668TOto ...8669:... to8670TOto clean8671VVclean up8672RPup ,8673,, and8674CCand a8675DTa ...8676:... a8677DTa man8678NNman used8679VVDuse the8680DTthe women8681NNSwoman 's8682POS's bathroom8683NNbathroom and8684CCand is8685VBZbe fired8686VVNfire .8687SENT. That8688DTthat person8689NNperson would8690MDwould certainly8691RBcertainly be8692VBbe injured8693VVNinjure .8694SENT. And8695CCand I8696PPI think8697VVPthink ,8698,, under8699INunder my8700PP$my friend8701NNfriend 's8702POS's test8703NNtest ,8704,, they8705PPthey would8706MDwould say8707VVsay just8708RBjust change8709VVchange the8710DTthe sex8711NNsex and8712CCand that8713DTthat person8714NNperson would8715MDwould n't8716RBn't have8717VHhave been8718VBNbe fired8719VVNfire .8720SENT. But8721CCbut here8722RBhere 's8723VBZbe the8724DTthe problem8725NNproblem :8726:: That8727WDTthat 's8728VBZbe not8729RBnot a8730DTa similarly8731RBsimilarly situated8732VVNsituate person8733NNperson .8734SENT. The8735DTthe proper8736JJproper analysis8737NNanalysis would8738MDwould say8739VVsay that8740IN/thatthat a8741DTa neutral8742JJneutral policy8743NNpolicy ,8744,, such8745JJsuch as8746INas use8747NNuse the8748DTthe showering8749VVGshower facility8750NNfacility that8751WDTthat corresponds8752VVZcorrespond to8753TOto your8754PP$your biological8755JJbiological sex8756NNsex ,8757,, the8758DTthe man8759NNman who8760WPwho uses8761VVZuse the8762DTthe women8763NNSwoman 's8764POS's shower8765NNshower ,8766,, the8767DTthe ...8768:... the8769DTthe comparator8770NNcomparator is8771VBZbe not8772RBnot a8773DTa woman8774NNwoman who8775WPwho uses8776VVZuse the8777DTthe woman8778NNwoman 's8779POS's shower8780NNshower .8781SENT. It8782PPit 's8783VBZbe a8784DTa woman8785NNwoman who8786WPwho uses8787VVZuse the8788DTthe men8789NNSman 's8790POS's shower8791NNshower ,8792,, because8793INbecause otherwise8794RBotherwise you8795PPyou 're8796VBPbe not8797RBnot ...8798:... otherwise8799RBotherwise you8800PPyou 're8801VBPbe ...8802:... you8803PPyou 're8804VBPbe loading8805VVGload the8806DTthe dice8807NNdice or8808CCor you8809PPyou 're8810VBPbe not8811RBnot looking8812VVGlook at8813INat similarly8814RBsimilarly situated8815VVNsituate people8816NNSpeople .8817SENT. And8818CCand the8819DTthe last8820JJlast thing8821NNthing I8822PPI 'd8823MDwould like8824VVlike to8825TOto get8826VVget into8827INinto is8828VBZbe this8829DTthis Court8830NPCourt ,8831,, in8832INin Espinoza8833NPEspinoza ,8834,, Footnote8835NNfootnote 28836CD2 ...8837:... I8838PPI think8839VVPthink there8840EXthere was8841VBDbe some8842DTsome discussion8843NNdiscussion of8844INof the8845DTthe states8846NNSstate early8847RBearly on8848INon .8849SENT. In8850INin Espinoza8851NPEspinoza ,8852,, in8853INin interpreting8854VVGinterpret national8855JJnational origin8856NNorigin discrimination8857NNdiscrimination ,8858,, this8859DTthis Court8860NPCourt said8861VVDsay the8862DTthe state8863NNstate practice8864NNpractice interpreting8865VVGinterpret parallel8866JJparallel laws8867NNSlaw is8868VBZbe highly8869RBhighly instructive8870JJinstructive .8871SENT. And8872CCand so8873INso I8874PPI ...8875:... I8876PPI think8877VVPthink the8878DTthe fact8879NNfact that8880IN/thatthat or8881CCor 238882CD@card@ states8883NNSstate have8884VHPhave done8885VVNdo this8886DTthis by8887INby legislation8888NNlegislation and8889CCand zero8890CDzero have8891VHPhave done8892VVNdo it8893PPit by8894INby judicial8895JJjudicial interpretation8896NNinterpretation ,8897,, just8898RBjust shows8899VVZshow that8900IN/thatthat this8901DTthis is8902VBZbe n't8903RBn't belt8904NNbelt and8905CCand suspenders8906NNSsuspender .8907SENT. It8908PPit 's8909VBZbe not8910RBnot redundancy8911NNredundancy ,8912,, that8913DTthat sex8914NNsex and8915CCand sexual8916JJsexual orientation8917NNorientation both8918CCboth in8919INin 19648920CD@card@ and8921CCand today8922NNtoday are8923VBPbe different8924JJdifferent concepts8925NNSconcept that8926WDTthat mean8927VVPmean different8928JJdifferent things8929NNSthing ,8930,, and8931CCand common8932JJcommon users8933NNSuser of8934INof ...8935:... of8936INof language8937NNlanguage both8938CCboth today8939NNtoday and8940CCand in8941INin 19648942CD@card@ would8943MDwould have8944VHhave recognized8945VVNrecognize that8946DTthat .8947SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8948LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Can8949MDcan they8950PPthey ever8951RBever be8952VBbe ?8953SENT? [MR. HARRIS]8954LOC[MR. HARRIS] I8955PPI 'm8956VBPbe sorry8957JJsorry ?8958SENT? [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8959LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I8960PPI know8961VVPknow ...8962:... can8963MDcan they8964PPthey ever8965RBever be8966VBbe ?8967SENT? Justice8968NPJustice ...8969:... justice8970NNjustice ...8971:... Judge8972NPJudge Lynch8973NPLynch below8974RBbelow said8975VVDsay that8976IN/thatthat homophobic8977JJhomophobic stereotypes8978NNSstereotype are8979VBPbe unrelated8980JJunrelated to8981TOto sexual8982JJsexual orientation8983NNorientation .8984SENT. The8985DTthe very8986RBvery first8987JJfirst case8988NNcase before8989INbefore us8990PPus shows8991VVZshow that8992IN/thatthat that8993DTthat 's8994VBZbe just8995RBjust not8996RBnot true8997JJtrue ,8998,, that8999DTthat homosexual9000JJhomosexual orientation9001NNorientation is9002VBZbe highly9003RBhighly correlated9004VVNcorrelate to9005TOto people9006NNSpeople 's9007POS's stereotypes9008NNSstereotype .9009SENT. If9010INif you9011PPyou 're9012VBPbe too9013RBtoo effeminate9014JJeffeminate a9015DTa man9016NNman ,9017,, you9018PPyou 're9019VBPbe a9020DTa homosexual9021NNhomosexual .9022SENT. If9023INif you9024PPyou 're9025VBPbe too9026RBtoo macho9027JJmacho a9028DTa woman9029NNwoman ,9030,, you9031PPyou 're9032VBPbe a9033DTa lesbian9034NNlesbian .9035SENT. Happens9036VVZhappen all9037PDTall the9038DTthe time9039NNtime .9040SENT. So9041RBso I9042PPI find9043VVPfind it9044PPit somewhat9045RBsomewhat difficult9046JJdifficult to9047TOto unwind9048VVunwind the9049DTthe two9050CDtwo .9051SENT. If9052INif not9053RBnot difficult9054JJdifficult ,9055,, nearly9056RBnearly impossible9057JJimpossible .9058SENT. [MR. HARRIS]9059LOC[MR. HARRIS] It9060PPit often9061RBoften is9062VBZbe ,9063,, Your9064PP$your Honor9065NPHonor ,9066,, and9067CCand it9068PPit 's9069VBZbe a9070DTa sad9071JJsad reality9072NNreality that9073IN/thatthat homophobic9074JJhomophobic slurs9075NNSslur are9076VBPbe often9077RBoften directed9078VVNdirect at9079INat heterosexual9080JJheterosexual or9081CCor homosexual9082JJhomosexual people9083NNSpeople to9084TOto ...9085:... to9086TOto criticize9087VVcriticize ...9088:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]9089LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] And9090CCand that9091WDTthat 's9092VBZbe okay9093JJokay under9094INunder your9095PP$your theory9096NNtheory ?9097SENT? [MR. HARRIS]9098LOC[MR. HARRIS] It9099PPit is9100VBZbe absolutely9101RBabsolutely not9102RBnot ,9103,, Your9104PP$your Honor9105NPHonor ,9106,, if9107INif that9108WDTthat person9109NNperson can9110MDcan show9111VVshow discrimination9112NNdiscrimination because9113INbecause of9114INof sex9115NNsex ,9116,, but9117CCbut what9118WPwhat ...9119:... what9120WPwhat the9121DTthe courts9122NNScourt can9123MDcan 't9124RB't do9125VVPdo is9126VBZbe what9127WPwhat the9128DTthe Second9129NPSecond Circuit9130NPCircuit did9131VVDdo and9132CCand the9133DTthe Seventh9134NPSeventh Circuit9135NPCircuit did9136VVDdo in9137INin Hively9138NPHively .9139SENT. Footnote9140NNfootnote 119141CD@card@ of9142INof the9143DTthe Zarda9144NPZarda opinion9145NNopinion is9146VBZbe very9147RBvery candid9148JJcandid about9149RBabout this9150DTthis where9151WRBwhere it9152PPit talks9153VVZtalk about9154INabout operationalizing9155VVGoperationalizing its9156PP$its holding9157NNholding .9158SENT. The9159DTthe Second9160NPSecond Circuit9161NPCircuit is9162VBZbe just9163RBjust going9164VVGgo to9165TOto change9166VVchange the9167DTthe jury9168NNjury instructions9169NNSinstruction to9170TOto tell9171VVtell juries9172NNSjury that9173IN/thatthat if9174INif they9175PPthey find9176VVPfind sexual9177JJsexual orientation9178NNorientation discrimination9179NNdiscrimination ,9180,, they9181PPthey 've9182VHPhave now9183RBnow found9184VVNfind sex9185NNsex discrimination9186NNdiscrimination .9187SENT. So9188RBso ,9189,, Justice9190NPJustice Sotomayor9191NPSotomayor ,9192,, I9193PPI do9194VVPdo n't9195RBn't disagree9196VVdisagree that9197IN/thatthat there9198EXthere will9199MDwill be9200VBbe difficult9201JJdifficult cases9202NNScase at9203INat the9204DTthe margins9205NNSmargin ,9206,, but9207CCbut the9208DTthe answer9209NNanswer is9210VBZbe not9211RBnot to9212TOto change9213VVchange the9214DTthe ultimate9215JJultimate inquiry9216NNinquiry and9217CCand replace9218VVreplace it9219PPit with9220INwith something9221NNsomething that9222IN/thatthat Congress9223NPCongress never9224RBnever could9225MDcould have9226VHhave intended9227VVNintend .9228SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]9229LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well9230UHWell ,9231,, if9232INif you9233PPyou have9234VHPhave a9235DTa minute9236NNminute ,9237,, let9238VVlet me9239PPme ask9240VVask you9241PPyou this9242DTthis :9243:: Let9244VVlet 's9245VBZbe imagine9246VVimagine that9247IN/thatthat the9248DTthe decisionmaker9249NNdecisionmaker in9250INin a9251DTa particular9252JJparticular case9253NNcase is9254VBZbe behind9255INbehind the9256DTthe veil9257NNveil of9258INof ignorance9259NNignorance and9260CCand the9261DTthe subordinate9262NNsubordinate who9263WPwho has9264VHZhave reviewed9265VVNreview the9266DTthe candidates9267NNScandidate for9268INfor a9269DTa position9270NNposition says9271VVZsay :9272:: I9273PPI 'm9274VBPbe going9275VVGgo to9276TOto tell9277VVtell you9278PPyou two9279CDtwo things9280NNSthing about9281INabout this9282DTthis candidate9283NNcandidate .9284SENT. This9285DTthis is9286VBZbe the9287DTthe very9288RBvery best9289JJSgood candidate9290NNcandidate for9291INfor the9292DTthe job9293NNjob ,9294,, and9295CCand this9296DTthis candidate9297NNcandidate is9298VBZbe attracted9299VVNattract to9300TOto members9301NNSmember of9302INof the9303DTthe same9304JJsame sex9305NNsex .9306SENT. And9307CCand the9308DTthe employer9309NNemployer says9310VVZsay :9311:: Okay9312JJokay ,9313,, I9314PPI 'm9315VBPbe going9316VVGgo ...9317:... I9318PPI 'm9319VBPbe not9320RBnot going9321VVGgo to9322TOto hire9323VVhire this9324DTthis person9325NNperson for9326INfor that9327DTthat reason9328NNreason .9329SENT. Is9330VBZbe that9331DTthat discrimination9332NNdiscrimination on9333INon the9334DTthe basis9335NNbasis of9336INof sex9337NNsex ,9338,, where9339WRBwhere the9340DTthe employer9341NNemployer does9342VVZdo n't9343RBn't even9344RBeven know9345VVknow the9346DTthe sex9347NNsex of9348INof the9349DTthe individual9350NNindividual involved9351VVDinvolve ?9352SENT? [MR. HARRIS]9353LOC[MR. HARRIS] May9354NPmay I9355PPI ?9356SENT? [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9357LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Please9358RBplease .9359SENT. [MR. HARRIS]9360LOC[MR. HARRIS] That9361DTthat would9362MDwould not9363RBnot be9364VBbe discrimination9365NNdiscrimination on9366INon the9367DTthe basis9368NNbasis of9369INof sex9370NNsex .9371SENT. And9372CCand I9373PPI think9374VVPthink that9375WDTthat 's9376VBZbe exactly9377RBexactly right9378JJright .9379SENT. If9380INif you9381PPyou get9382VVPget a9383DTa resume9384NNresume that9385WDTthat ...9386:... that9387WDTthat has9388VHZhave a9389DTa name9390NNname that9391WDTthat could9392MDcould be9393VBbe male9394JJmale or9395CCor female9396JJfemale ,9397,, and9398CCand there9399EXthere 's9400VBZbe something9401NNsomething on9402INon there9403RBthere suggesting9404VVGsuggest that9405IN/thatthat the9406DTthe person9407NNperson is9408VBZbe gay9409JJgay and9410CCand they9411PPthey 're9412VBPbe not9413RBnot hired9414VVNhire for9415INfor that9416DTthat reason9417NNreason ,9418,, that9419WDTthat would9420MDwould be9421VBbe sexual9422JJsexual orientation9423NNorientation discrimination9424NNdiscrimination .9425SENT. That9426DTthat has9427VHZhave absolutely9428RBabsolutely nothing9429NNnothing whatsoever9430RBwhatsoever to9431TOto do9432VVdo with9433INwith sex9434NNsex discrimination9435NNdiscrimination .9436SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9437LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank9438VVthank you9439PPyou ,9440,, counsel9441NNcounsel .9442SENT. General9443NPGeneral Francisco9444NPFrancisco .9445SENT.

[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9446LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Mr9447NPMr .9448SENT. Chief9449NPChief Justice9450NPJustice ,9451,, and9452CCand may9453MDmay it9454PPit please9455VVplease the9456DTthe Court9457NPCourt :9458:: The9459DTthe issue9460NNissue is9461VBZbe not9462RBnot whether9463INwhether Congress9464NPCongress can9465MDcan or9466CCor should9467MDshould prohibit9468VVprohibit employment9469NNemployment discrimination9470NNdiscrimination because9471INbecause of9472INof sexual9473JJsexual orientation9474NNorientation .9475SENT. The9476DTthe issue9477NNissue ,9478,, rather9479RBrather ,9480,, is9481VBZbe whether9482INwhether it9483PPit did9484VVDdo so9485RBso when9486WRBwhen it9487PPit prohibited9488VVDprohibit discrimination9489NNdiscrimination because9490INbecause of9491INof sex9492NNsex .9493SENT. It9494PPit did9495VVDdo not9496RBnot for9497INfor two9498CDtwo reasons9499NNSreason .9500SENT. First9501RBfirst ,9502,, sex9503NNsex means9504VVZmean whether9505INwhether you9506PPyou 're9507VBPbe male9508JJmale or9509CCor female9510JJfemale ,9511,, not9512RBnot whether9513INwhether you9514PPyou 're9515VBPbe gay9516JJgay or9517CCor straight9518JJstraight .9519SENT. So9520RBso if9521INif you9522PPyou treat9523VVPtreat all9524DTall gay9525JJgay and9526CCand men9527NNSman ...9528:... gay9529JJgay men9530NNSman and9531CCand women9532NNSwoman exactly9533RBexactly the9534DTthe same9535JJsame regardless9536RBregardless of9537INof their9538PP$their sex9539NNsex ,9540,, you9541PPyou 're9542VBPbe not9543RBnot discriminating9544VVGdiscriminate against9545INagainst them9546PPthem because9547INbecause of9548INof their9549PP$their sex9550NNsex .9551SENT. Second9552RBsecond ,9553,, any9554DTany doubt9555NNdoubt is9556VBZbe removed9557VVNremove by9558INby the9559DTthe history9560NNhistory of9561INof Title9562NPTitle VII9563NPVII and9564CCand related9565JJrelated statutes9566NNSstatute since9567INsince ,9568,, in9569INin the9570DTthe face9571NNface of9572INof unanimous9573JJunanimous interpretation9574NNinterpretation by9575INby the9576DTthe courts9577NNScourt and9578CCand the9579DTthe executive9580JJexecutive branch9581NNbranch that9582WDTthat persisted9583VVDpersist for9584INfor decades9585NNSdecade ,9586,, Congress9587NPCongress has9588VHZhave repeatedly9589RBrepeatedly extended9590VVNextend other9591JJother statutes9592NNSstatute to9593TOto specifically9594RBspecifically cover9595VVcover sexual9596JJsexual orientation9597NNorientation ,9598,, yet9599RByet has9600VHZhave refused9601VVNrefuse to9602TOto do9603VVdo so9604RBso with9605INwith respect9606NNrespect to9607TOto Title9608NPTitle VII9609NPVII .9610SENT. The9611DTthe employee9612NNemployee 's9613POS's position9614NNposition would9615MDwould nullify9616VVnullify that9617DTthat conscious9618JJconscious choice9619NNchoice .9620SENT. And9621CCand Justice9622NPJustice Gorsuch9623NPGorsuch ,9624,, if9625INif I9626PPI could9627MDcould first9628RBfirst address9629VVaddress your9630PP$your question9631NNquestion about9632INabout our9633PP$our ...9634:... my9635PP$my friend9636NNfriend on9637INon the9638DTthe other9639JJother side9640NNside 's9641POS's argument9642NNargument about9643INabout the9644DTthe literal9645JJliteral meaning9646NNmeaning of9647INof the9648DTthe statute9649NNstatute ,9650,, well9651RBwell ,9652,, there9653EXthere are9654VBPbe essentially9655RBessentially two9656CDtwo responses9657NNSresponse to9658TOto that9659DTthat argument9660NNargument .9661SENT. And9662CCand they9663PPthey 're9664VBPbe related9665VVNrelate .9666SENT. The9667DTthe first9668JJfirst is9669VBZbe that9670IN/thatthat under9671INunder that9672DTthat interpretation9673NNinterpretation ,9674,, you9675PPyou actually9676RBactually could9677MDcould n't9678RBn't fire9679VVfire a9680DTa man9681NNman for9682INfor using9683VVGuse the9684DTthe woman9685NNwoman 's9686POS's restroom9687NNrestroom because9688INbecause in9689INin some9690DTsome metaphysical9691JJmetaphysical sense9692NNsense ,9693,, that9694DTthat man9695NNman 's9696POS's sex9697NNsex is9698VBZbe a9699DTa but-for9700NNbut-for cause9701NNcause for9702INfor his9703PP$his firing9704NNfiring .9705SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9706LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But9707CCbut he9708PPhe 's9709VBZbe not9710RBnot ...9711:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]9712LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] The9713DTthe reason9714NNreason ...9715:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9716LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...9717:... injured9718VVNinjure .9719SENT. He9720PPhe 's9721VBZbe not9722RBnot injured9723VVNinjure .9724SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]9725LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Well9726UHwell ,9727,, he9728PPhe 's9729VBZbe fired9730VVNfire ,9731,, Your9732PP$your Honor9733NPHonor ,9734,, in9735INin my9736PP$my hypothetical9737JJhypothetical .9738SENT. And9739CCand the9740DTthe reason9741NNreason why9742WRBwhy that9743DTthat is9744VBZbe permitted9745VVNpermit ...9746:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9747LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I9748PPI think9749VVPthink counsel9750NNcounsel acknowledged9751VVDacknowledge all9752RBall of9753INof that9754DTthat .9755SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]9756LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yeah9757NPYeah .9758SENT. And9759CCand the9760DTthe reason9761NNreason why9762WRBwhy that9763DTthat 's9764VBZbe permitted9765VVNpermit ,9766,, though9767RBthough ,9768,, to9769TOto do9770VVdo that9771IN/thatthat ,9772,, is9773VBZbe because9774INbecause you9775PPyou 're9776VBPbe treating9777VVGtreat ...9778:... and9779CCand this9780DTthis is9781VBZbe my9782PP$my second9783JJsecond point9784NNpoint ...9785:... you9786PPyou 're9787VBPbe treating9788VVGtreat him9789PPhim the9790DTthe ...9791:... the9792DTthe same9793JJsame as9794INas a9795DTa similarly9796RBsimilarly situated9797VVNsituate woman9798NNwoman ;9799:; that9800WDTthat is9801VBZbe ,9802,, a9803DTa woman9804NNwoman who9805WPwho uses9806VVZuse the9807DTthe men9808NNSman 's9809POS's room9810NNroom .9811SENT. And9812CCand that9813DTthat 's9814VBZbe always9815RBalways the9816DTthe critical9817JJcritical analysis9818NNanalysis when9819WRBwhen you9820PPyou 're9821VBPbe trying9822VVGtry to9823TOto determine9824VVdetermine if9825INif somebody9826NNsomebody is9827VBZbe being9828JJbeing ...9829:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9830LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Is9831VBZbe it9832PPit ...9833:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]9834LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...9835:... discriminated9836VVNdiscriminate against9837INagainst because9838INbecause ...9839:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9840LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Is9841VBZbe it9842PPit ...9843:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]9844LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...9845:... of9846INof their9847PP$their sex9848NNsex .9849SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9850LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Is9851VBZbe it9852PPit ...9853:... let9854VVlet me9855PPme give9856VVgive you9857PPyou a9858DTa not-hypothetical9859JJnot-hypothetical case9860NNcase .9861SENT. An9862DTan airline9863NNairline hires9864VVZhire only9865JJonly women9866NNSwoman as9867INas cabin9868NNcabin attendants9869NNSattendant ,9870,, but9871CCbut it9872PPit fires9873VVZfire them9874PPthem if9875INif they9876PPthey marry9877VVPmarry .9878SENT. The9879DTthe airline9880NNairline 's9881POS's defense9882NNdefense is9883VBZbe whatever9884WDTwhatever we9885PPwe 're9886VBPbe doing9887VVGdo ,9888,, it9889PPit 's9890VBZbe not9891RBnot sex9892NNsex discrimination9893NNdiscrimination against9894INagainst women9895NNSwoman because9896INbecause we9897PPwe do9898VVPdo n't9899RBn't hire9900VVhire any9901DTany men9902NNSman at9903INat all9904DTall ,9905,, married9906JJmarried or9907CCor unmarried9908JJunmarried .9909SENT. That9910DTthat case9911NNcase ,9912,, I9913PPI take9914VVPtake it9915PPit from9916INfrom your9917PP$your brief9918NNbrief ,9919,, you9920PPyou would9921MDwould say9922VVsay there9923EXthere 's9924VBZbe no9925DTno sex9926NNsex ...9927:... no9928DTno violation9929NNviolation of9930INof Title9931NPTitle VII9932NPVII ?9933SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]9934LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Well9935UHwell ...9936:... well9937UHwell ,9938,, no9939UHno ,9940,, Your9941PP$your Honor9942NPHonor ,9943,, because9944INbecause I9945PPI think9946VVPthink the9947DTthe problem9948NNproblem is9949VBZbe that9950IN/thatthat the9951DTthe prohibition9952NNprohibition on9953INon hiring9954VVGhire any9955DTany male9956JJmale flight9957NNflight attendants9958NNSattendant would9959MDwould in9960INin and9961CCand of9962INof itself9963PPitself violate9964VVPviolate ...9965:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9966LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] That9967DTthat ...9968:... but9969RBbut ...9970:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]9971LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...9972:... Title9973NPTitle VII9974NPVII .9975SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9976LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But9977CCbut the9978DTthe male9979NNmale is9980VBZbe not9981RBnot complaining9982VVGcomplain .9983SENT. The9984DTthe complainant9985NNcomplainant is9986VBZbe the9987DTthe woman9988NNwoman who9989WPwho was9990VBDbe fired9991VVNfire because9992INbecause she9993PPshe married9994VVDmarry .9995SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]9996LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Okay9997NPOkay .9998SENT. So9999RBso then10000RBthen ...10001:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10002LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] The10003DTthe male10004JJmale complainant10005NNcomplainant might10006MDmight have10007VHhave a10008DTa very10009RBvery good10010JJgood case10011NNcase ,10012,, but10013CCbut my10014PP$my case10015NNcase ...10016:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10017LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right10018NPRight ,10019,, and10020CCand my10021PP$my ...10022:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10023LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...10024:... is10025VBZbe the10026DTthe woman10027NNwoman .10028SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10029LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] And10030CCand my10031PP$my problem10032NNproblem with10033INwith the10034DTthe hypothetical10035JJhypothetical is10036VBZbe that10037IN/thatthat the10038DTthe way10039NNway it10040PPit is10041VBZbe constructed10042VVNconstruct ,10043,, there10044EXthere is10045VBZbe ,10046,, you10047PPyou know10048VVPknow ,10049,, presumably10050RBpresumably no10051DTno men10052NNSman that10053WDTthat have10054VHPhave the10055DTthe job10056NNjob in10057INin the10058DTthe first10059JJfirst place10060NNplace .10061SENT. Now10062RBnow ,10063,, if10064INif you10065PPyou say10066VVPsay that10067IN/thatthat in10068INin theory10069NNtheory men10070NNSman should10071MDshould be10072VBbe able10073JJable to10074TOto have10075VHhave the10076DTthe job10077NNjob ,10078,, then10079RBthen the10080DTthe question10081NNquestion would10082MDwould be10083VBbe would10084MDwould you10085PPyou also10086RBalso have10087VHPhave fired10088VVNfire men10089NNSman who10090WPwho were10091VBDbe married10092VVNmarry ?10093SENT? And10094CCand if10095INif you10096PPyou only10097RBonly fired10098VVDfire women10099NNSwoman who10100WPwho were10101VBDbe married10102VVNmarry but10103CCbut not10104RBnot men10105NNSman who10106WPwho married10107VVDmarry ,10108,, that10109WDTthat would10110MDwould plainly10111RBplainly be10112VBbe a10113DTa violation10114NNviolation of10115INof Title10116NPTitle VII10117NPVII because10118INbecause you10119PPyou 're10120VBPbe treating10121VVGtreat similarly10122RBsimilarly situated10123VVNsituate people10124NNSpeople differently10125RBdifferently .10126SENT. But10127CCbut to10128TOto finish10129VVfinish ...10130:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10131LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] General10132NPGeneral ,10133,, that10134WDTthat ...10135:... that10136WDTthat 's10137VBZbe an10138DTan ...10139:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10140LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...10141:... my10142PP$my answer10143NNanswer to10144TOto Justice10145NPJustice ...10146:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10147LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...10148:... an10149DTan impossible10150JJimpossible idea10151NNidea to10152TOto ...10153:... to10154TOto put10155VVput into10156INinto practice10157NNpractice by10158INby taking10159VVGtake out10160RPout the10161DTthe sex10162NNsex .10163SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10164LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] May10165NPmay I10166PPI just10167RBjust continue10168VVPcontinue with10169INwith it10170PPit ?10171SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10172LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yes10173NPYes ,10174,, Your10175PP$your Honor10176NPHonor .10177SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10178LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] The10179DTthe hypothetical10180JJhypothetical is10181VBZbe not10182RBnot a10183DTa hypothetical10184JJhypothetical .10185SENT. Its10186PP$its Sprogis10187NPSprogis against10188INagainst United10189NPUnited Airlines10190NPSAirlines .10191SENT. And10192CCand it10193PPit was10194VBDbe given10195VVNgive ,10196,, and10197CCand not10198RBnot challenged10199VVNchallenge ,10200,, that10201IN/thatthat they10202PPthey did10203VVDdo n't10204RBn't hire10205VVhire men10206NNSman as10207INas cabin10208NNcabin attendants10209NNSattendant .10210SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10211LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right10212NPRight .10213SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10214LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But10215CCbut they10216PPthey fired10217VVDfire this10218DTthis woman10219NNwoman because10220INbecause she10221PPshe married10222VVDmarry ,10223,, she10224PPshe did10225VVDdo n't10226RBn't look10227VVlook like10228INlike Cheryl10229NPCheryl "10230''" Fly10231NPFly Me10232NPMe .10233SENT. "10234''" [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10235LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right10236NPRight .10237SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10238LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Once10239INonce she10240PPshe married10241VVDmarry ,10242,, she10243PPshe would10244MDwould n't10245RBn't be10246VBbe attracted10247VVNattract to10248TOto the10249DTthe male10250JJmale passengers10251NNSpassenger .10252SENT. The10253DTthe court10254NNcourt of10255INof appeals10256NNSappeal said10257VVDsay ,10258,, Title10259NPTitle VII10260NPVII was10261VBDbe meant10262VVNmean to10263TOto strike10264VVstrike out10265RPout the10266DTthe entire10267JJentire spectrum10268NNspectrum of10269INof sex10270NNsex stereotyping10271VVGstereotype ,10272,, so10273RBso if10274INif this10275DTthis woman10276NNwoman was10277VBDbe fired10278VVNfire because10279INbecause she10280PPshe was10281VBDbe n't10282RBn't ...10283:... she10284PPshe would10285MDwould no10286RBno longer10287RBRlonger be10288VBbe so10289RBso attractive10290JJattractive to10291TOto men10292NNSman if10293INif she10294PPshe is10295VBZbe married10296JJmarried ,10297,, that10298WDTthat 's10299VBZbe sex10300NNsex discrimination10301NNdiscrimination .10302SENT. And10303CCand we10304PPwe do10305VVPdo n't10306RBn't have10307VHhave to10308TOto have10309VHhave a10310DTa ...10311:... a10312DTa ...10313:... a10314DTa male10315NNmale involved10316VVDinvolve .10317SENT. This10318DTthis is10319VBZbe a10320DTa woman10321NNwoman who10322WPwho was10323VBDbe treated10324VVNtreat in10325INin a10326DTa very10327RBvery stereotypical10328JJstereotypical way10329NNway .10330SENT. She10331PPshe is10332VBZbe no10333RBno longer10334RBRlonger young10335JJyoung and10336CCand attractive10337JJattractive when10338WRBwhen she10339PPshe married10340VVDmarry .10341SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10342LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Your10343PP$your Honor10344NPHonor ,10345,, I10346PPI ...10347:... I10348PPI ...10349:... I10350PPI do10351VVPdo think10352VVthink that10353IN/thatthat the10354DTthe question10355NNquestion is10356VBZbe always10357RBalways ,10358,, are10359VBPbe you10360PPyou treating10361VVGtreat similarly10362RBsimilarly situated10363VVNsituate men10364NNSman and10365CCand women10366NNSwoman differently10367RBdifferently .10368SENT. There10369EXthere are10370VBPbe times10371NNStime where10372WRBwhere issues10373NNSissue of10374INof proof10375NNproof are10376VBPbe very10377RBvery difficult10378JJdifficult .10379SENT. For10380INfor example10381NNexample ,10382,, in10383INin the10384DTthe Price10385NPPrice Waterhouse10386NPWaterhouse case10387NNcase ,10388,, Ann10389NPAnn Hopkins10390NPHopkins was10391VBDbe fired10392VVNfire because10393INbecause she10394PPshe was10395VBDbe aggressive10396JJaggressive ...10397:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10398LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But10399CCbut this10400DTthis was10401VBDbe ...10402:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10403LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...10404:... because10405INbecause she10406PPshe was10407VBDbe rude10408JJrude to10409TOto staff10410NNstaff ...10411:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10412LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...10413:... this10414DTthis was10415VBDbe an10416DTan actual10417JJactual case10418NNcase .10419SENT. This10420DTthis was10421VBDbe an10422DTan actual10423JJactual case10424NNcase and10425CCand it10426PPit was10427VBDbe given10428VVNgive that10429IN/thatthat no10430DTno males10431NNSmale are10432VBPbe hiring10433VVGhire and10434CCand no10435DTno male10436NNmale is10437VBZbe complaining10438VVGcomplain .10439SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10440LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] But10441CCbut ,10442,, Your10443PP$your Honor10444NPHonor ,10445,, the10446DTthe way10447NNway that10448IN/thatthat actual10449JJactual case10450NNcase was10451VBDbe resolved10452VVNresolve was10453VBDbe because10454INbecause the10455DTthe woman10456NNwoman had10457VHDhave not10458RBnot brought10459VVNbring her10460PP$her claim10461NNclaim in10462INin a10463DTa timely10464JJtimely fashion10465NNfashion on10466INon the10467DTthe sex10468NNsex discrimination10469NNdiscrimination piece10470NNpiece .10471SENT. And10472CCand so10473RBso the10474DTthe way10475NNway this10476DTthis Court10477NPCourt resolved10478VVDresolve that10479IN/thatthat decision10480NNdecision was10481VBDbe it10482PPit said10483VVDsay ,10484,, all10485DTall right10486NNright ...10487:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10488LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] The10489DTthe ...10490:... no10491UHno .10492SENT. This10493DTthis case10494NNcase ...10495:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10496LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...10497:... she10498PPshe is10499VBZbe being10500VBGbe treated10501VVNtreat the10502DTthe same10503JJsame ...10504:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10505LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...10506:... never10507RBnever came10508VVDcome to10509TOto this10510DTthis case10511NNcase ,10512,, never10513RBnever came10514VVDcome to10515TOto this10516DTthis Court10517NPCourt .10518SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10519LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] So10520INso I10521PPI guess10522VVPguess I10523PPI 'm10524VBPbe thinking10525VVGthink of10526INof the10527DTthe wrong10528JJwrong case10529NNcase .10530SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10531LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Sprogis10532NPSprogis against10533INagainst United10534NPUnited Airlines10535NPSAirlines ,10536,, Seventh10537NPSeventh Circuit10538NPCircuit .10539SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]10540LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] General10541NPGeneral ,10542,, could10543MDcould I10544PPI go10545VVgo back10546RBback to10547TOto your10548PP$your opening10549NNopening statement10550NNstatement and10551CCand particularly10552RBparticularly to10553TOto the10554DTthe second10555JJsecond part10556NNpart of10557INof it10558PPit ?10559SENT? You10560PPyou talked10561VVDtalk about10562INabout the10563DTthe history10564NNhistory of10565INof ...10566:... of10567INof Title10568NPTitle VII10569NPVII and10570CCand some10571DTsome of10572INof the10573DTthe subsequent10574JJsubsequent legislative10575JJlegislative history10576NNhistory ,10577,, and10578CCand I10579PPI guess10580VVPguess what10581WPwhat strikes10582VVZstrike me10583PPme ,10584,, and10585CCand I10586PPI was10587VBDbe struck10588VVNstrike in10589INin reading10590VVGread your10591PP$your briefs10592NNSbrief too10593RBtoo ,10594,, is10595VBZbe that10596IN/thatthat the10597DTthe arguments10598NNSargument you10599PPyou 're10600VBPbe making10601VVGmake ,10602,, I10603PPI would10604MDwould say10605VVsay ,10606,, are10607VBPbe not10608RBnot ones10609NNSone we10610PPwe typically10611RBtypically would10612MDwould accept10613VVaccept .10614SENT. For10615INfor many10616JJmany years10617NNSyear ,10618,, the10619DTthe lodestar10620NNlodestar of10621INof this10622DTthis Court10623NPCourt 's10624POS's statutory10625JJstatutory interpretation10626NNinterpretation has10627VHZhave been10628VBNbe the10629DTthe text10630NNtext of10631INof a10632DTa statute10633NNstatute ,10634,, not10635RBnot the10636DTthe legislative10637JJlegislative history10638NNhistory ,10639,, and10640CCand certainly10641RBcertainly not10642RBnot the10643DTthe subsequent10644JJsubsequent legislative10645JJlegislative history10646NNhistory .10647SENT. And10648CCand the10649DTthe text10650NNtext of10651INof the10652DTthe statute10653NNstatute appears10654VVZappear to10655TOto be10656VBbe pretty10657RBpretty firmly10658RBfirmly in10659INin Ms10660NNMs .10661SENT. Karlan10662NPKarlan 's10663POS's corner10664NNcorner .10665SENT. Did10666VVDdo you10667PPyou discriminate10668JJdiscriminate against10669INagainst somebody10670NNsomebody ,10671,, against10672INagainst her10673PP$her client10674NNclient ,10675,, because10676INbecause of10677INof sex10678NNsex ?10679SENT? Yes10680UHyes ,10681,, you10682PPyou did10683VVDdo .10684SENT. Because10685INbecause you10686PPyou fired10687VVDfire the10688DTthe person10689NNperson because10690INbecause this10691DTthis was10692VBDbe a10693DTa man10694NNman who10695WPwho loved10696VVDlove other10697JJother men10698NNSman .10699SENT. And10700CCand part10701NNpart of10702INof that10703DTthat ...10704:... and10705CCand it10706PPit only10707RBonly has10708VHZhave to10709TOto be10710VBbe part10711NNpart ,10712,, we10713PPwe 've10714VHPhave made10715VVNmake very10716RBvery clear10717VVclear there10718EXthere 's10719VBZbe no10720DTno search10721NNsearch for10722INfor sole10723JJsole cause10724NNcause in10725INin Title10726NPTitle VII10727NPVII ...10728:... part10729NNpart of10730INof that10731WDTthat is10732VBZbe you10733PPyou fired10734VVDfire the10735DTthe person10736NNperson because10737INbecause he10738PPhe was10739VBDbe a10740DTa man10741NNman .10742SENT. If10743INif he10744PPhe were10745VBDbe a10746DTa woman10747NNwoman ,10748,, he10749PPhe would10750MDwould n't10751RBn't have10752VHhave been10753VBNbe fired10754VVNfire .10755SENT. This10756DTthis is10757VBZbe the10758DTthe usual10759JJusual kind10760NNkind of10761INof way10762NNway in10763INin which10764WDTwhich we10765PPwe interpret10766VVPinterpret statutes10767NNSstatute now10768RBnow .10769SENT. We10770PPwe look10771VVPlook to10772TOto laws10773NNSlaw .10774SENT. We10775PPwe do10776VVPdo n't10777RBn't look10778VVlook ...10779:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10780LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right10781RBright .10782SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]10783LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...10784:... to10785TOto predictions10786NNSprediction .10787SENT. We10788PPwe do10789VVPdo n't10790RBn't look10791VVlook to10792TOto desires10793NNSdesire .10794SENT. We10795PPwe do10796VVPdo n't10797RBn't look10798VVlook to10799TOto wishes10800NNSwish .10801SENT. We10802PPwe look10803VVPlook to10804TOto laws10805NNSlaw .10806SENT. Why10807WRBwhy does10808VVZdo n't10809RBn't that10810WDTthat mean10811VVPmean your10812PP$your argument10813NNargument failed10814VVDfail ?10815SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10816LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Because10817INbecause ,10818,, Your10819PP$your Honor10820NPHonor ,10821,, I10822PPI think10823VVPthink that10824IN/thatthat what10825WPwhat our10826PP$our brief10827JJbrief attempts10828NNSattempt to10829TOto do10830VVdo ,10831,, at10832INat least10833JJSleast ,10834,, is10835VBZbe make10836VVmake a10837DTa straightforward10838JJstraightforward textual10839JJtextual argument10840NNargument .10841SENT. The10842DTthe law10843NNlaw distinguishes10844VVZdistinguish between10845INbetween sex10846NNsex and10847CCand sexual10848JJsexual orientation10849NNorientation .10850SENT. Those10851DTthose are10852VBPbe two10853CDtwo different10854JJdifferent traits10855NNStrait .10856SENT. And10857CCand that10858DTthat 's10859VBZbe precisely10860RBprecisely why10861WRBwhy when10862WRBwhen Congress10863NPCongress wants10864VVZwant to10865TOto prohibit10866VVprohibit discrimination10867NNdiscrimination based10868VVNbase on10869INon sexual10870JJsexual orientation10871NNorientation ,10872,, it10873PPit does10874VVZdo n't10875RBn't define10876VVdefine sex10877NNsex as10878INas including10879VVGinclude sexual10880JJsexual orientation10881NNorientation .10882SENT. It10883PPit lists10884VVZlist it10885PPit as10886INas a10887DTa different10888JJdifferent trait10889NNtrait .10890SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10891LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] What10892WDTwhat ...10893:... what10894WPwhat is10895VBZbe ...10896:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10897LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] And10898CCand so10899RBso under10900INunder Title10901NPTitle ...10902:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10903LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] What10904WPWhat is10905VBZbe your10906PP$your response10907NNresponse to10908TOto the10909DTthe two-comparator10910NNtwo-comparator problem10911NNproblem we10912PPwe 've10913VHPhave been10914VBNbe discussing10915VVGdiscuss and10916CCand the10917DTthe fact10918NNfact that10919IN/thatthat at10920INat least10921JJSleast one10922CDone contributing10923VVGcontribute cause10924NNcause appears10925VVZappear to10926TOto be10927VBbe sex10928NNsex ?10929SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]10930LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Well10931UHWell ,10932,, Your10933PP$your Honor10934NPHonor ,10935,, a10936DTa couple10937NNcouple of10938INof responses10939NNSresponse .10940SENT. First10941RBfirst ,10942,, I10943PPI do10944VVPdo n't10945RBn't think10946VVthink that10947IN/thatthat one10948CDone contributing10949JJcontributing cause10950NNcause is10951VBZbe sex10952NNsex .10953SENT. I10954PPI think10955VVPthink that10956IN/thatthat as10957RBas long10958RBlong as10959INas you10960PPyou 're10961VBPbe treating10962VVGtreat gay10963JJgay men10964NNSman and10965CCand women10966NNSwoman exactly10967RBexactly the10968DTthe same10969JJsame regardless10970RBregardless of10971INof their10972PP$their sex10973NNsex ,10974,, the10975DTthe contributing10976VVGcontribute cause10977NNcause is10978VBZbe sexual10979JJsexual orientation10980NNorientation ,10981,, not10982RBnot sex10983NNsex .10984SENT. And10985CCand ,10986,, two10987CDtwo ,10988,, I10989PPI think10990VVPthink it10991PPit reflects10992VVZreflect the10993DTthe fact10994NNfact that10995IN/thatthat sex10996NNsex and10997CCand sexual10998JJsexual orientation10999NNorientation are11000VBPbe different11001JJdifferent traits11002NNStrait .11003SENT. And11004CCand if11005INif you11006PPyou do11007VVPdo the11008DTthe analysis11009NNanalysis the11010DTthe way11011NNway my11012PP$my friends11013NNSfriend on11014INon the11015DTthe other11016JJother side11017NNside suggested11018VVDsuggest ,11019,, you11020PPyou 've11021VHPhave completely11022RBcompletely eliminated11023VVNeliminate the11024DTthe distinction11025NNdistinction between11026INbetween two11027CDtwo very11028RBvery different11029JJdifferent traits11030NNStrait and11031CCand you11032PPyou 've11033VHPhave ...11034:... and11035CCand you11036PPyou 've11037VHPhave essentially11038RBessentially rendered11039VVNrender ...11040:... you11041PPyou nullified11042VVDnullify Congress11043NPCongress 's11044POS's careful11045JJcareful ...11046:... very11047RBvery careful11048JJcareful decisions11049NNSdecision in11050INin numerous11051JJnumerous other11052JJother statutes11053NNSstatute to11054TOto specifically11055RBspecifically protect11056VVprotect sexual11057JJsexual orientation11058NNorientation and11059CCand gender11060NNgender identities11061NNSidentity ,11062,, we'll11063NNwe'll ...11064:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]11065LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Is11066VBZbe there11067RBthere ...11068:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11069LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Is11070VBZbe there11071RBthere anything11072NNanything ...11073:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]11074LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...11075:... get11076VVget to11077TOto in11078INin the11079DTthe next11080JJnext case11081NNcase .11082SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11083LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...11084:... in11085INin this11086DTthis record11087NNrecord showing11088VVGshow that11089IN/thatthat the11090DTthe employers11091NNSemployer would11092MDwould not11093RBnot employ11094VVemploy lesbian11095JJlesbian women11096NNSwoman ?11097SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]11098LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] You11099PPyou know11100VVPknow ,11101,, Your11102PP$your Honor11103NPHonor ,11104,, in11105INin these11106DTthese cases11107NNScase ,11108,, and11109CCand this11110DTthis may11111MDmay have11112VHhave been11113VBNbe a11114DTa better11115JJRgood question11116NNquestion for11117INfor my11118PP$my colleague11119NNcolleague ,11120,, but11121CCbut I11122PPI think11123VVPthink in11124INin these11125DTthese cases11126NNScase ,11127,, the11128DTthe employers11129NNSemployer have11130VHPhave ...11131:... in11132INin the11133DTthe cases11134NNScase ...11135:... the11136DTthe sexual11137JJsexual orientation11138NNorientation cases11139NNScase ,11140,, the11141DTthe employers11142NNSemployer have11143VHPhave generally11144RBgenerally denied11145VVNdeny that11146IN/thatthat they11147PPthey discriminate11148VVPdiscriminate based11149VVNbase on11150INon ...11151:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11152LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But11153CCbut all11154RBall we11155PPwe know11156VVPknow on11157INon ...11158:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]11159LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...11160:... their11161PP$their sexual11162JJsexual orientation11163NNorientation .11164SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11165LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Did11166VVDdo this11167DTthis go11168NNgo ...11169:... the11170DTthe ...11171:... the11172DTthe ...11173:... the11174DTthe allegation11175NNallegation is11176VBZbe that11177IN/thatthat the11178DTthe person11179NNperson was11180VBDbe discharged11181VVNdischarge when11182WRBwhen he11183PPhe announced11184VVDannounce that11185IN/thatthat he11186PPhe was11187VBDbe gay11188JJgay .11189SENT. There11190EXthere 's11191VBZbe nothing11192NNnothing in11193INin the11194DTthe record11195NNrecord as11196RBas far11197RBfar as11198INas I11199PPI can11200MDcan see11201VVsee that11202IN/thatthat there11203EXthere was11204VBDbe a11205DTa policy11206NNpolicy on11207INon the11208DTthe employer11209NNemployer 's11210POS's part11211NNpart of11212INof discharging11213VVGdischarge or11214CCor not11215RBnot ...11216:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]11217LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right11218RBright .11219SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11220LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...11221:... discharging11222VVGdischarge lesbian11223JJlesbian women11224NNSwoman .11225SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]11226LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] I11227PPI think11228VVPthink that11229WDTthat 's11230VBZbe right11231JJright .11232SENT. I11233PPI think11234VVPthink basically11235RBbasically the11236DTthe employer11237NNemployer 's11238POS's defenses11239NNSdefense here11240RBhere were11241VBDbe ,11242,, one11243CDone ,11244,, I11245PPI did11246VVDdo n't11247RBn't fire11248VVfire him11249PPhim because11250INbecause he11251PPhe was11252VBDbe gay11253JJgay ,11254,, but11255CCbut ,11256,, two11257CDtwo ,11258,, if11259INif you11260PPyou think11261VVPthink I11262PPI did11263VVDdo ,11264,, Title11265NPTitle VII11266NPVII does11267VVZdo n't11268RBn't prohibit11269VVprohibit discrimination11270NNdiscrimination based11271VVNbase on11272INon sexual11273JJsexual orientation11274NNorientation .11275SENT. And11276CCand if11277INif I11278PPI could11279MDcould address11280VVaddress lastly11281RBlastly the11282DTthe point11283NNpoint that11284IN/thatthat the11285DTthe Chief11286NPChief Justice11287NPJustice and11288CCand Justice11289NPJustice Alito11290NPAlito were11291VBDbe raising11292VVGraise about11293INabout so-called11294JJso-called legislative11295JJlegislative updating11296VVGupdate that11297IN/thatthat Judge11298NPJudge Posner11299NPPosner suggested11300VVDsuggest ,11301,, here11302RBhere I11303PPI think11304VVPthink that11305IN/thatthat a11306DTa judicial11307JJjudicial ruling11308NNruling would11309MDwould be11310VBbe particularly11311RBparticularly pernicious11312JJpernicious because11313INbecause when11314WRBwhen Congress11315NPCongress seeks11316VVZseek to11317TOto expand11318VVexpand the11319DTthe scope11320NNscope of11321INof Title11322NPTitle VII11323NPVII 's11324POS's liability11325NNliability provisions11326NNSprovision ,11327,, it11328PPit typically11329RBtypically couples11330VVZcouple that11331IN/thatthat itself11332PPitself with11333INwith an11334DTan expansion11335NNexpansion of11336INof the11337DTthe religious11338JJreligious employers11339NNSemployer exemption11340NNexemption to11341TOto Title11342NPTitle VII11343NPVII ,11344,, precisely11345RBprecisely because11346INbecause issues11347NNSissue of11348INof sexual11349JJsexual orientation11350NNorientation like11351INlike issues11352NNSissue of11353INof gender11354NNgender identity11355NNidentity raise11356VVraise different11357JJdifferent issues11358NNSissue from11359INfrom a11360DTa religious11361JJreligious liberty11362NNliberty perspective11363NNperspective .11364SENT. The11365DTthe employee11366NNemployee 's11367POS's position11368NNposition here11369RBhere would11370MDwould only11371RBonly do11372VVdo half11373NNhalf of11374INof that11375DTthat work11376NNwork .11377SENT. It11378PPit would11379MDwould expand11380VVexpand the11381DTthe scope11382NNscope of11383INof liability11384NNliability without11385INwithout giving11386VVGgive any11387DTany consideration11388NNconsideration to11389TOto those11390DTthose religious11391JJreligious liberty11392NNliberty interests11393NNSinterest on11394INon the11395DTthe other11396JJother side11397NNside of11398INof the11399DTthe balance11400NNbalance ,11401,, and11402CCand that11403DTthat is11404VBZbe precisely11405RBprecisely why11406WRBwhy this11407DTthis is11408VBZbe the11409DTthe type11410NNtype of11411INof issue11412NNissue that11413WDTthat is11414VBZbe better11415RBRwell left11416VVNleave to11417TOto Congress11418NPCongress than11419INthan the11420DTthe courts11421NNScourt .11422SENT. Justice11423NPJustice Gorsuch11424NPGorsuch ,11425,, I11426PPI want11427VVPwant to11428TOto make11429VVmake sure11430JJsure that11431IN/thatthat I11432PPI fully11433RBfully addressed11434VVDaddress your11435PP$your ...11436:... your11437PP$your textual11438JJtextual considerations11439NNSconsideration ,11440,, though11441RBthough ,11442,, because11443INbecause I11444PPI really11445RBreally do11446VVPdo think11447VVPthink it11448PPit boils11449VVZboil down11450RPdown to11451TOto the11452DTthe fact11453NNfact that11454IN/thatthat sex11455NNsex and11456CCand sexual11457JJsexual orientation11458NNorientation are11459VBPbe different11460JJdifferent traits11461NNStrait .11462SENT. May11463MDmay I11464PPI finish11465VVfinish my11466PP$my answer11467NNanswer ?11468SENT? [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11469LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Sure11470NPSure .11471SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]11472LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Title11473NPTitle VII11474NPVII prohibits11475VVZprohibit discrimination11476NNdiscrimination based11477VVNbase on11478INon one11479CDone of11480INof those11481DTthose traits11482NNStrait ,11483,, as11484RBas long11485RBlong as11486INas you11487PPyou treat11488VVPtreat men11489NNSman and11490CCand women11491NNSwoman who11492WPwho are11493VBPbe similarly11494RBsimilarly situated11495VVNsituate with11496INwith respect11497NNrespect to11498TOto the11499DTthe other11500JJother trait11501NNtrait exactly11502RBexactly the11503DTthe same11504JJsame ,11505,, you11506PPyou 're11507VBPbe not11508RBnot "11509``" discriminating11510VVGdiscriminate "11511''" under11512INunder ...11513:... within11514INwithin the11515DTthe meaning11516NNmeaning of11517INof Title11518NPTitle VII11519NPVII .11520SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11521LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank11522VVthank you11523PPyou ,11524,, counsel11525NNcounsel .11526SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]11527LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Thank11528VVthank you11529PPyou .11530SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11531LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Five11532CDFive minutes11533NNSminute ,11534,, Ms11535NNMs .11536SENT. Karlan11537NPKarlan .11538SENT.

[MS. KARLAN]11539LOC[MS. KARLAN] Thank11540VVthank you11541PPyou .11542SENT. Let11543VVlet me11544PPme start11545VVstart with11546INwith the11547DTthe question11548NNquestion that11549IN/thatthat Justice11550NPJustice Ginsburg11551NPGinsburg asked11552VVDask because11553INbecause I11554PPI think11555VVPthink it11556PPit 's11557VBZbe illustrative11558JJillustrative of11559INof contemporary11560JJcontemporary sexual11561JJsexual orientation11562NNorientation discrimination11563NNdiscrimination cases11564NNScase .11565SENT. Virtually11566RBvirtually none11567NNnone of11568INof them11569PPthem involve11570VVPinvolve an11571DTan employer11572NNemployer ,11573,, and11574CCand neither11575RBneither of11576INof the11577DTthe cases11578NNScase before11579INbefore you11580PPyou does11581VVZdo ,11582,, who11583WPwho claims11584VVZclaim to11585TOto have11586VHhave an11587DTan across-the-board11588JJacross-the-board policy11589NNpolicy of11590INof firing11591NNfiring both11592CCboth all11593DTall gay11594JJgay men11595NNSman and11596CCand all11597DTall lesbians11598NNSlesbian .11599SENT. What11600WPWhat tends11601VVZtend to11602TOto happen11603VVhappen ,11604,, and11605CCand this11606DTthis case11607NNcase is11608VBZbe illustrative11609JJillustrative of11610INof this11611DTthis ,11612,, is11613VBZbe a11614DTa man11615NNman who11616WPwho also11617RBalso does11618VVZdo n't11619RBn't conform11620VVconform with11621INwith some11622DTsome other11623JJother gender-based11624JJgender-based stereotypes11625NNSstereotype and11626CCand who11627WPwho is11628VBZbe gay11629JJgay gets11630VVZget fired11631VVNfire ,11632,, which11633WDTwhich puts11634VVZput them11635PPthem in11636INin exactly11637RBexactly the11638DTthe position11639NNposition that11640IN/thatthat Justice11641NPJustice Sotomayor11642NPSotomayor mentioned11643VVDmention ,11644,, which11645WDTwhich is11646VBZbe really11647RBreally devilishly11648RBdevilishly hard11649JJhard to11650TOto figure11651VVfigure out11652RPout what11653WPwhat 's11654VBZbe going11655VVGgo on11656INon here11657RBhere .11658SENT. The11659DTthe second11660JJsecond point11661NNpoint I11662PPI just11663RBjust want11664VVPwant to11665TOto leave11666VVleave the11667DTthe Court11668NNcourt with11669INwith is11670VBZbe ,11671,, the11672DTthe entire11673JJentire argument11674NNargument on11675INon the11676DTthe other11677JJother side11678NNside depends11679VVZdepend on11680INon the11681DTthe idea11682NNidea that11683IN/thatthat men11684NNSman who11685WPwho are11686VBPbe gay11687JJgay and11688CCand women11689NNSwoman who11690WPwho are11691VBPbe lesbians11692NNSlesbian are11693VBPbe being11694VBGbe treated11695VVNtreat the11696DTthe same11697JJsame .11698SENT. And11699CCand that11700DTthat 's11701VBZbe just11702RBjust not11703RBnot so11704RBso .11705SENT. Because11706INbecause if11707INif you11708PPyou look11709VVPlook at11710INat what11711WPwhat actually11712RBactually causes11713VVZcause the11714DTthe problem11715NNproblem ,11716,, it11717PPit 's11718VBZbe the11719DTthe man11720NNman who11721WPwho says11722VVZsay ,11723,, I11724PPI married11725VVDmarry my11726PP$my partner11727NNpartner ,11728,, Bill11729NPBill .11730SENT. If11731INif any11732DTany woman11733NNwoman who11734WPwho worked11735VVDwork there11736EXthere had11737VHDhave married11738VVNmarry Bill11739NPBill ,11740,, he11741PPhe would11742MDwould n't11743RBn't ...11744:... she11745PPshe would11746MDwould not11747RBnot have11748VHhave been11749VBNbe fired11750VVNfire .11751SENT. And11752CCand he11753PPhe is11754VBZbe .11755SENT. And11756CCand you11757PPyou have11758VHPhave to11759TOto look11760VVlook ,11761,, because11762INbecause the11763DTthe textual11764JJtextual language11765NNlanguage tells11766VVZtell you11767PPyou to11768TOto ,11769,, at11770INat such11771JJsuch individual11772JJindividual and11773CCand not11774RBnot at11775INat the11776DTthe overall11777JJoverall class11778NNclass .11779SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]11780LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Ms11781NNMs .11782SENT. Karlan11783NPKarlan ,11784,, would11785MDwould you11786PPyou address11787VVaddress these11788DTthese ...11789:... General11790NPGeneral 's11791POS's statement11792NNstatement at11793INat the11794DTthe end11795NNend ?11796SENT? He11797PPhe ...11798:... he11799PPhe goes11800VVZgo back11801RBback to11802TOto the11803DTthe comparator11804NNcomparator should11805MDshould be11806VBbe a11807DTa woman11808NNwoman who11809WPwho ...11810:... a11811DTa ...11812:... a11813DTa man11814NNman who11815WPwho likes11816VVZlike a11817DTa man11818NNman and11819CCand a11820DTa woman11821NNwoman who11822WPwho likes11823VVZlike a11824DTa woman11825NNwoman .11826SENT. You11827PPyou 're11828VBPbe trying11829VVGtry to11830TOto get11831VVget to11832TOto that11833DTthat .11834SENT. [MS. KARLAN]11835LOC[MS. KARLAN] Yes11836NPYes .11837SENT. I11838PPI think11839VVPthink he11840PPhe ...11841:... he11842PPhe is11843VBZbe varying11844VVGvary two11845CDtwo things11846NNSthing there11847RBthere .11848SENT. One11849CDOne ,11850,, he11851PPhe is11852VBZbe varying11853VVGvary the11854DTthe sex11855NNsex of11856INof the11857DTthe employee11858NNemployee and11859CCand ,11860,, second11861RBsecond ,11862,, he11863PPhe 's11864VBZbe varying11865VVGvary the11866DTthe sex11867NNsex of11868INof the11869DTthe person11870NNperson to11871TOto whom11872WPwhom the11873DTthe employee11874NNemployee is11875VBZbe interested11876JJinterested .11877SENT. And11878CCand if11879INif two11880CDtwo things11881NNSthing that11882RBthat ...11883:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]11884LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So11885CCso give11886VVgive us11887PPus an11888DTan example11889NNexample from11890INfrom a11891DTa case11892NNcase how11893WRBhow you11894PPyou can11895MDcan 't11896RB't do11897VVPdo that11898DTthat .11899SENT. [MS. KARLAN]11900LOC[MS. KARLAN] I11901PPI 'm11902VBPbe not11903RBnot sure11904JJsure ...11905:... of11906INof course11907NNcourse you11908PPyou can11909MDcan do11910VVdo it11911PPit but11912CCbut you11913PPyou do11914VVPdo n't11915RBn't have11916VHhave to11917TOto .11918SENT. Because11919INbecause all11920DTall you11921PPyou need11922VVPneed to11923TOto do11924VVdo is11925VBZbe show11926VVshow that11927DTthat sex11928NNsex played11929VVDplay a11930DTa role11931NNrole here11932RBhere .11933SENT. And11934CCand if11935INif the11936DTthe answer11937NNanswer is11938VBZbe if11939INif a11940DTa man11941NNman had11942VHDhave ...11943:... if11944INif a11945DTa woman11946NNwoman had11947VHDhave come11948VVNcome in11949RPin and11950CCand said11951VVDsay ,11952,, I11953PPI like11954VVPlike to11955TOto date11956VVdate men11957NNSman ,11958,, you11959PPyou would11960MDwould n't11961RBn't have11962VHhave fired11963VVNfire her11964PPher ,11965,, and11966CCand when11967WRBwhen a11968DTa man11969NNman says11970VVZsay ,11971,, I11972PPI like11973VVPlike to11974TOto date11975VVdate men11976NNSman ,11977,, you11978PPyou did11979VVDdo ,11980,, that11981WDTthat 's11982VBZbe enough11983JJenough to11984TOto show11985VVshow sex11986NNsex discrimination11987NNdiscrimination .11988SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]11989LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But11990CCbut what11991WPwhat if11992INif the11993DTthe decisionmaker11994NNdecisionmaker makes11995VVZmake a11996DTa decision11997NNdecision based11998VVNbase on11999INon sexual12000JJsexual orientation12001NNorientation but12002CCbut does12003VVZdo not12004RBnot know12005VVknow the12006DTthe biological12007JJbiological sex12008NNsex of12009INof the12010DTthe person12011NNperson involved12012VVDinvolve ?12013SENT? [MS. KARLAN]12014LOC[MS. KARLAN] Well12015UHwell ,12016,, there12017EXthere is12018VBZbe no12019DTno reported12020JJreported case12021NNcase that12022WDTthat does12023VVZdo that12024DTthat .12025SENT. And12026CCand I12027PPI ...12028:... [JUSTICE ALITO]12029LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] All12030DTall right12031NNright .12032SENT. [MS. KARLAN]12033LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...12034:... think12035VVPthink the12036DTthe Court12037NPCourt ...12038:... [JUSTICE ALITO]12039LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But12040CCbut what12041WPwhat if12042INif ...12043:... [MS. KARLAN]12044LOC[MS. KARLAN] ...12045:... can12046MDcan wrestle12047VVwrestle with12048INwith ...12049:... [JUSTICE ALITO]12050LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] What12051WPWhat if12052INif it12053PPit happened12054VVDhappen ?12055SENT? We12056PPwe have12057VHPhave had12058VHDhave a12059DTa lot12060NNlot of12061INof hypotheticals12062NNShypotheticals of12063INof things12064NNSthing that12065WDTthat may12066MDmay or12067CCor may12068MDmay not12069RBnot have12070VHhave happened12071VVNhappen .12072SENT. What12073WPWhat if12074INif that12075DTthat happens12076VVZhappen ?12077SENT? Is12078VBZbe that12079DTthat discrimination12080NNdiscrimination on12081INon the12082DTthe basis12083NNbasis of12084INof sex12085NNsex where12086WRBwhere the12087DTthe decisionmaker12088NNdecisionmaker does12089VVZdo n't12090RBn't even12091RBeven know12092VVknow the12093DTthe person12094NNperson 's12095POS's sex12096NNsex ?12097SENT? [MS. KARLAN]12098LOC[MS. KARLAN] And12099CCand ...12100:... and12101CCand how12102WRBhow do12103VVPdo they12104PPthey know12105VVPknow the12106DTthe person12107NNperson 's12108POS's sexual12109JJsexual orientation12110NNorientation ?12111SENT? [JUSTICE ALITO]12112LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Because12113INbecause somebody12114NNsomebody who12115WPwho interviewed12116VVDinterview the12117DTthe candidates12118NNScandidate tells12119VVZtell them12120PPthem that12121DTthat .12122SENT. [MS. KARLAN]12123LOC[MS. KARLAN] And12124CCand they12125PPthey are12126VBPbe unable12127JJunable to12128TOto tell12129VVtell anything12130NNanything about12131INabout the12132DTthe person12133NNperson 's12134POS's sex12135NNsex ?12136SENT? [JUSTICE ALITO]12137LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] No12138NPNo .12139SENT. [MS. KARLAN]12140LOC[MS. KARLAN] So12141INso this12142DTthis is12143VBZbe Saturday12144NPSaturday Night12145NPNight Live12146NPLive Pat12147NPPat ,12148,, as12149RBas ...12150:... as12151INas an12152DTan example12153NNexample ,12154,, right12155RBright ?12156SENT? [12157SYM[ LAUGHTER12158NNlaughter ]12159SYM] [JUSTICE ALITO]12160LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well12161UHwell ,12162,, I12163PPI 'm12164VBPbe not12165RBnot familiar12166JJfamiliar with12167INwith that12168DTthat .12169SENT. [MS. KARLAN]12170LOC[MS. KARLAN] Okay12171NPOkay .12172SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]12173LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But12174CCbut ...12175:... [MS. KARLAN]12176LOC[MS. KARLAN] Which12177WDTwhich is12178VBZbe the12179DTthe person12180NNperson named12181VVNname Pat12182NPPat ,12183,, and12184CCand you12185PPyou can12186MDcan never12187RBnever tell12188VVtell whether12189INwhether Pat12190NPPat is12191VBZbe a12192DTa man12193NNman or12194CCor a12195DTa woman12196NNwoman .12197SENT. I12198PPI mean12199VVPmean ,12200,, theoretically12201RBtheoretically that12202DTthat person12203NNperson might12204MDmight be12205VBbe out12206RBout there12207RBthere .12208SENT. But12209CCbut here12210RBhere is12211VBZbe the12212DTthe key12213JJkey ...12214:... [JUSTICE ALITO]12215LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Theoretically12216RBtheoretically what12217WPwhat ?12218SENT? [MS. KARLAN]12219LOC[MS. KARLAN] Theoretically12220RBtheoretically that12221IN/thatthat person12222NNperson might12223MDmight be12224VBbe out12225RBout there12226RBthere .12227SENT. But12228CCbut here12229RBhere is12230VBZbe the12231DTthe key12232NNkey :12233:: The12234DTthe ...12235:... the12236DTthe cases12237NNScase that12238WDTthat are12239VBPbe brought12240VVNbring are12241VBPbe almost12242RBalmost all12243RBall brought12244VVNbring by12245INby somebody12246NNsomebody who12247WPwho says12248VVZsay my12249PP$my employer12250NNemployer knew12251VVDknow who12252WPwho I12253PPI was12254VBDbe and12255CCand fired12256VVNfire me12257PPme because12258INbecause I12259PPI was12260VBDbe a12261DTa man12262NNman or12263CCor fired12264VVDfire me12265PPme because12266INbecause I12267PPI was12268VBDbe a12269DTa woman12270NNwoman .12271SENT. Somebody12272NNsomebody who12273WPwho comes12274VVZcome in12275INin and12276CCand says12277VVZsay I12278PPI 'm12279VBPbe not12280RBnot going12281VVGgo to12282TOto tell12283VVtell you12284PPyou what12285WPwhat my12286PP$my sex12287NNsex is12288VBZbe ,12289,, but12290CCbut ,12291,, believe12292VVPbelieve me12293PPme ,12294,, I12295PPI was12296VBDbe fired12297VVNfire for12298INfor my12299PP$my sexual12300JJsexual orientation12301NNorientation ,12302,, that12303DTthat person12304NNperson will12305MDwill lose12306VVlose .12307SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]12308LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well12309UHWell ,12310,, if12311INif that12312WDTthat 's12313VBZbe the12314DTthe case12315NNcase ,12316,, then12317RBthen I12318PPI think12319VVPthink your12320PP$your whole12321JJwhole argument12322NNargument collapses12323NNScollapse because12324INbecause sexual12325JJsexual orientation12326NNorientation then12327RBthen is12328VBZbe a12329DTa different12330JJdifferent thing12331NNthing from12332INfrom sex12333NNsex .12334SENT. [MS. KARLAN]12335LOC[MS. KARLAN] Of12336INof course12337NNcourse it12338PPit is12339VBZbe .12340SENT. No12341DTno one12342CDone has12343VHZhave claimed12344VVNclaim that12345DTthat sexual12346JJsexual orientation12347NNorientation is12348VBZbe the12349DTthe same12350JJsame thing12351NNthing as12352INas sex12353NNsex .12354SENT. What12355WPWhat we12356PPwe are12357VBPbe saying12358VVGsay is12359VBZbe when12360WRBwhen somebody12361NNsomebody is12362VBZbe fired12363VVNfire ...12364:... [JUSTICE ALITO]12365LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well12366UHwell ,12367,, let12368VVlet me12369PPme amend12370VVamend it12371PPit .12372SENT. Your12373PP$your argument12374NNargument is12375VBZbe that12376DTthat sex12377NNsex ...12378:... discrimination12379NNdiscrimination based12380VVNbase on12381INon sexual12382JJsexual orientation12383NNorientation necessarily12384RBnecessarily entails12385VVZentail discrimination12386NNdiscrimination based12387VVNbase on12388INon sex12389NNsex .12390SENT. But12391CCbut if12392INif it12393PPit 's12394VBZbe the12395DTthe case12396NNcase that12397IN/thatthat there12398EXthere would12399MDwould be12400VBbe no12401DTno liability12402NNliability in12403INin the12404DTthe situation12405NNsituation where12406WRBwhere the12407DTthe decisionmaker12408NNdecisionmaker has12409VHZhave no12410DTno knowledge12411NNknowledge of12412INof sex12413NNsex ,12414,, then12415RBthen that12416DTthat can12417MDcan 't12418RB't possibly12419RBpossibly be12420VBbe true12421JJtrue .12422SENT. [MS. KARLAN]12423LOC[MS. KARLAN] If12424INif there12425EXthere was12426VBDbe that12427DTthat case12428NNcase ,12429,, it12430PPit might12431MDmight be12432VBbe the12433DTthe rare12434JJrare case12435NNcase in12436INin which12437WDTwhich sexual12438JJsexual orientation12439NNorientation discrimination12440NNdiscrimination is12441VBZbe not12442RBnot a12443DTa subset12444NNsubset of12445INof sex12446NNsex .12447SENT. But12448CCbut in12449INin the12450DTthe case12451NNcase where12452WRBwhere the12453DTthe person12454NNperson knows12455VVZknow the12456DTthe sex12457NNsex of12458INof the12459DTthe person12460NNperson that12461IN/thatthat they12462PPthey 're12463VBPbe firing12464VVGfire or12465CCor refusing12466VVGrefuse to12467TOto hire12468VVhire ,12469,, and12470CCand knows12471VVZknow the12472DTthe sex12473NNsex of12474INof the12475DTthe people12476NNSpeople to12477TOto whom12478WPwhom that12479DTthat person12480NNperson is12481VBZbe attracted12482VVNattract ,12483,, that12484WDTthat is12485VBZbe sex12486NNsex discrimination12487NNdiscrimination ,12488,, pure12489JJpure and12490CCand simple12491JJsimple .12492SENT. And12493CCand it12494PPit 's12495VBZbe important12496JJimportant to12497TOto understand12498VVunderstand that12499DTthat ...12500:... and12501CCand ...12502:... and12503CCand this12504DTthis goes12505VVZgo back12506RBback to12507TOto something12508NNsomething that12509IN/thatthat Justice12510NPJustice Ginsburg12511NPGinsburg asked12512VVDask during12513INduring the12514DTthe opening12515NNopening argument12516NNargument ,12517,, that12518DTthat discrimination12519NNdiscrimination against12520INagainst gay12521JJgay men12522NNSman and12523CCand discrimination12524NNdiscrimination against12525INagainst lesbians12526NNSlesbian is12527VBZbe not12528RBnot one12529CDone thing12530NNthing .12531SENT. And12532CCand in12533INin 196412534CD@card@ ,12535,, if12536INif you12537PPyou look12538VVPlook at12539INat the12540DTthe members12541NNSmember of12542INof Congress12543NPCongress 's12544POS's brief12545NNbrief ,12546,, they12547PPthey will12548MDwill tell12549VVtell you12550PPyou if12551INif you12552PPyou looked12553VVDlook in12554INin the12555DTthe dictionary12556NNdictionary there12557EXthere was12558VBDbe no12559DTno phrase12560NNphrase "12561``" sexual12562JJsexual orientation12563NNorientation .12564SENT. "12565``" That12566DTthat is12567VBZbe a12568DTa modern12569JJmodern way12570NNway of12571INof combining12572VVGcombine two12573CDtwo kinds12574NNSkind of12575INof discrimination12576NNdiscrimination :12577:: Discrimination12578NNdiscrimination against12579INagainst gay12580JJgay men12581NNSman ,12582,, which12583WDTwhich goes12584VVZgo back12585RBback to12586TOto Leviticus12587NPLeviticus and12588CCand the12589DTthe common12590JJcommon law12591NNlaw ,12592,, and12593CCand discrimination12594NNdiscrimination against12595INagainst lesbians12596NNSlesbian ,12597,, which12598WDTwhich was12599VBDbe not12600RBnot part12601NNpart of12602INof Leviticus12603NPLeviticus and12604CCand was12605VBDbe not12606RBnot part12607NNpart of12608INof the12609DTthe common12610JJcommon law12611NNlaw .12612SENT. Indeed12613RBindeed ,12614,, in12615INin 196412616CD@card@ ,12617,, there12618EXthere were12619VBDbe only12620RBonly 1612621CD@card@ states12622NNSstate in12623INin the12624DTthe United12625NPUnited States12626NPStates that12627IN/thatthat clearly12628RBclearly forbid12629VVNforbid some12630DTsome act12631NNact in12632INin which12633WDTwhich lesbians12634NNSlesbian could12635MDcould engage12636VVengage .12637SENT. So12638INso the12639DTthe idea12640NNidea that12641IN/thatthat this12642DTthis is12643VBZbe one12644CDone large12645JJlarge idea12646NNidea about12647INabout sexual12648JJsexual orientation12649NNorientation discrimination12650NNdiscrimination in12651INin the12652DTthe abstract12653JJabstract ,12654,, without12655INwithout reference12656NNreference to12657TOto sex12658NNsex ,12659,, simply12660RBsimply burkes12661VVZburke the12662DTthe history12663NNhistory and12664CCand burkes12665VVZburke the12666DTthe understanding12667NNunderstanding .12668SENT. And12669CCand if12670INif you12671PPyou look12672VVPlook at12673INat the12674DTthe harassment12675NNharassment cases12676NNScase ,12677,, you12678PPyou will12679MDwill see12680VVsee why12681WRBwhy this12682DTthis is12683VBZbe true12684JJtrue .12685SENT. Gay12686JJgay men12687NNSman are12688VBPbe harassed12689VVNharass in12690INin a12691DTa different12692JJdifferent way12693NNway than12694INthan lesbians12695NNSlesbian .12696SENT. Thank12697VVthank you12698PPyou .12699SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12700LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank12701VVthank you12702PPyou ,12703,, counsel12704NNcounsel .12705SENT. The12706DTthe case12707NNcase is12708VBZbe submitted12709VVNsubmit .12710SENT.