[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We2PPwe
'll3MDwill
hear4VVhear
argument5NNargument
first6RBfirst
this7DTthis
morning8NNmorning
in9INin
Case10NPCase
17-161811CD@card@
,12,,
Bostock13NPBostock
versus14CCversus
Clayton15NPClayton
County16NPCounty
,17,,
and18CCand
the19DTthe
consolidated20JJconsolidated
case21NNcase
.22SENT.
Ms23NNMs
.24SENT.
Karlan25NPKarlan
.26SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]27LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Thank28VVthank
you29PPyou
,30,,
Mr31NPMr
.32SENT.
Chief33NPChief
Justice34NPJustice
,35,,
and36CCand
may37MDmay
it38PPit
please39VVplease
the40DTthe
Court41NPCourt
:42::
When43WRBwhen
a44DTa
employer45NNemployer
fires46VVZfire
a47DTa
male48JJmale
employee49NNemployee
for50INfor
dating51VVGdate
men52NNSman
but53CCbut
does54VVZdo
not55RBnot
fire56VVfire
female57JJfemale
employees58NNSemployee
who59WPwho
date60VVPdate
men61NNSman
,62,,
he63PPhe
violates64VVZviolate
Title65NPTitle
VII66NPVII
.67SENT.
The68DTthe
employer69NNemployer
has70VHZhave
,71,,
in72INin
the73DTthe
words74NNSword
of75INof
Section76NPSection
70377CD@card@
(78((
a79DTa
)80))
,81,,
discriminated82VVNdiscriminate
against83INagainst
the84DTthe
man85NNman
because86INbecause
he87PPhe
treats88VVZtreat
that89DTthat
man90NNman
worse91JJRbad
than92INthan
women93NNSwoman
who94WPwho
want95VVPwant
to96TOto
do97VVdo
the98DTthe
same99JJsame
thing100NNthing
.101SENT.
And102CCand
that103DTthat
discrimination104NNdiscrimination
is105VBZbe
because106INbecause
of107INof
sex108NNsex
,109,,
again110RBagain
in111INin
the112DTthe
words113NNSword
of114INof
Section115NPSection
703116CD@card@
(117((
a118DTa
)119))
,120,,
because121INbecause
the122DTthe
adverse123JJadverse
employment124NNemployment
action125NNaction
is126VBZbe
based127VVNbase
on128INon
the129DTthe
male130JJmale
employee131NNemployee
's132POS's
failure133NNfailure
to134TOto
conform135VVconform
to136TOto
a137DTa
particular138JJparticular
expectation139NNexpectation
about140INabout
how141WRBhow
men142NNSman
should143MDshould
behave144VVbehave
;145:;
namely146RBnamely
,147,,
that148IN/thatthat
men149NNSman
should150MDshould
be151VBbe
attracted152VVNattract
only153RBonly
to154TOto
women155NNSwoman
and156CCand
not157RBnot
to158TOto
men159NNSman
.160SENT.
There161EXthere
is162VBZbe
no163DTno
analytic164JJanalytic
difference165NNdifference
between166INbetween
this167DTthis
kind168NNkind
of169INof
discrimination170NNdiscrimination
and171CCand
forms172NNSform
of173INof
discrimination174NNdiscrimination
that175WDTthat
have176VHPhave
been177VBNbe
already178RBalready
recognized179VVNrecognize
by180INby
every181DTevery
court182NNcourt
to183TOto
have184VHhave
addressed185VVNaddress
them186PPthem
.187SENT.
For188INfor
example189NNexample
,190,,
discrimination191NNdiscrimination
against192INagainst
men193NNSman
who194WPwho
are195VBPbe
effeminate196JJeffeminate
rather197RBrather
than198INthan
macho199NNmacho
.200SENT.
Like201INlike
the202DTthe
discrimination203NNdiscrimination
here204RBhere
,205,,
that206IN/thatthat
discrimination207NNdiscrimination
is208VBZbe
because209INbecause
of210INof
non-conformity211NNnon-conformity
with212INwith
an213DTan
expectation214NNexpectation
about215INabout
how216WRBhow
men217NNSman
should218MDshould
behave219VVbehave
.220SENT.
The221DTthe
attempt222NNattempt
to223TOto
carve224VVcarve
out225RPout
discrimination226NNdiscrimination
against227INagainst
men228NNSman
for229INfor
being230VBGbe
gay231JJgay
from232INfrom
Title233NPTitle
VII234NPVII
cannot235MDcan
be236VBbe
administered237VVNadminister
with238INwith
either239DTeither
consistency240NNconsistency
or241CCor
integrity242NNintegrity
.243SENT.
In244INin
the245DTthe
words246NNSword
of247INof
the248DTthe
en249NNen
banc250NNbanc
Second251NPSecond
Circuit252NPCircuit
,253,,
it254PPit
forces255VVZforce
judges256NNSjudge
to257TOto
result258VVresult
...259:...
resort260NNresort
to261TOto
lexical262JJlexical
bean263NNbean
counting264NNcounting
where265WRBwhere
they266PPthey
count267VVPcount
up268RPup
the269DTthe
frequency270NNfrequency
of271INof
epithets272NNSepithet
,273,,
such274JJsuch
as275INas
"276``"
fag277NNfag
,278,,
"279''"
"280``"
gay281JJgay
,282,,
"283''"
"284``"
queer285JJqueer
,286,,
"287''"
"288``"
real289JJreal
man290NNman
,291,,
"292''"
and293CCand
"294``"
fem295NNfem
,296,,
"297''"
to298TOto
determine299VVdetermine
whether300INwhether
or301CCor
not302RBnot
discrimination303NNdiscrimination
is304VBZbe
based305VVNbase
on306INon
sex307NNsex
or308CCor
sexual309JJsexual
orientation310NNorientation
.311SENT.
That312DTthat
attempt313NNattempt
is314VBZbe
futile315JJfutile
because316INbecause
when317WRBwhen
a318DTa
man319NNman
is320VBZbe
discriminated321VVNdiscriminate
against322INagainst
for323INfor
being324VBGbe
gay325JJgay
,326,,
he327PPhe
is328VBZbe
discriminated329VVNdiscriminate
against330INagainst
for331INfor
not332RBnot
conforming333VVGconform
to334TOto
an335DTan
expectation336NNexpectation
about337INabout
how338WRBhow
men339NNSman
should340MDshould
behave341VVbehave
.342SENT.
Finally343RBfinally
,344,,
the345DTthe
possibility346NNpossibility
that347IN/thatthat
some348DTsome
employers349NNSemployer
,350,,
but351CCbut
not352RBnot
the353DTthe
employers354NNSemployer
here355RBhere
,356,,
may357MDmay
have358VHhave
policies359NNSpolicy
of360INof
denying361VVGdeny
employment362NNemployment
opportunities363NNSopportunity
both364CCboth
to365TOto
gay366JJgay
men367NNSman
and368CCand
to369TOto
lesbians370NNSlesbian
does371VVZdo
not372RBnot
change373VVchange
the374DTthe
unlawfulness375NNunlawfulness
of376INof
what377WPwhat
was378VBDbe
alleged379VVNallege
by380INby
the381DTthe
employees382NNSemployee
here383RBhere
.384SENT.
Labeling385VVGlabel
those386DTthose
policies387NNSpolicy
under388INunder
an389DTan
umbrella390NNumbrella
phrase391NNphrase
like392INlike
"393``"
sexual394JJsexual
orientation395NNorientation
discrimination396NNdiscrimination
"397``"
cannot398MDcan
hide399VVhide
the400DTthe
fact401NNfact
that402IN/thatthat
such403PDTsuch
an404DTan
employer405NNemployer
is406VBZbe
a407DTa
double408JJdouble
discriminator409NNdiscriminator
.410SENT.
It411PPit
discriminates412VVZdiscriminate
against413INagainst
men414NNSman
who415WPwho
do416VVPdo
not417RBnot
conform418VVconform
to419TOto
a420DTa
male421JJmale
stereotype422NNstereotype
,423,,
and424CCand
it425PPit
discriminates426VVZdiscriminate
against427INagainst
women428NNSwoman
who429WPwho
do430VVPdo
not431RBnot
conform432VVconform
to433TOto
an434DTan
expectation435NNexpectation
about436INabout
female437JJfemale
...438:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]439LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Ms440NNMs
.441SENT.
Karlan442NPKarlan
...443:...
Ms444NNMs
.445SENT.
Karlan446NPKarlan
,447,,
how448WRBhow
do449VVPdo
you450PPyou
answer451VVanswer
the452DTthe
argument453NNargument
that454IN/thatthat
back455RBback
in456INin
1964457CD@card@
,458,,
this459DTthis
could460MDcould
not461RBnot
have462VHhave
been463VBNbe
in464INin
Congress465NPCongress
's466POS's
mind467NNmind
because468INbecause
in469INin
...470:...
in471INin
many472JJmany
states473NNSstate
male474JJmale
same-sex475NNsame-sex
relations476NNSrelation
was477VBDbe
a478DTa
criminal479JJcriminal
offense480NNoffense
;481:;
the482DTthe
American483JJAmerican
Psychiatric484JJpsychiatric
Association485NNassociation
labeled486VVDlabel
homosexuality487NNhomosexuality
a488DTa
...489:...
a490DTa
mental491JJmental
illness492NNillness
?493SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]494LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Well495UHwell
,496,,
I497PPI
think498VVPthink
you499PPyou
read500VVPread
the501DTthe
words502NNSword
of503INof
the504DTthe
statute505NNstatute
.506SENT.
And507CCand
this508DTthis
Court509NPCourt
has510VHZhave
recognized511VVNrecognize
again512RBagain
and513CCand
again514RBagain
forms515NNSform
of516INof
sex517NNsex
discrimination518NNdiscrimination
that519WDTthat
were520VBDbe
not521RBnot
in522INin
Congress523NPCongress
's524POS's
contemplation525NNcontemplation
in526INin
1964527CD@card@
.528SENT.
In529INin
1964530CD@card@
,531,,
those532DTthose
were533VBDbe
the534DTthe
days535NNSday
of536INof
Mad537JJmad
Men538NNSman
,539,,
so540RBso
the541DTthe
idea542NNidea
that543IN/thatthat
sexual544JJsexual
harassment545NNharassment
would546MDwould
have547VHhave
been548VBNbe
reached549VVNreach
,550,,
most551JJSmost
courts552NNScourt
did553VVDdo
n't554RBn't
find555VVfind
sexual556JJsexual
harassment557NNharassment
to558TOto
be559VBbe
actionable560JJactionable
until561INuntil
this562DTthis
Court563NPCourt
did564VVDdo
.565SENT.
In566INin
Price567NPPrice
Waterhouse568NPWaterhouse
,569,,
this570DTthis
Court571NPCourt
recognized572VVDrecognize
that573DTthat
discrimination574NNdiscrimination
against575INagainst
a576DTa
woman577NNwoman
who578WPwho
cursed579VVDcurse
like580INlike
a581DTa
sailor582NNsailor
,583,,
walked584VVDwalk
like585INlike
a586DTa
man587NNman
,588,,
and589CCand
did590VVDdo
n't591RBn't
wear592VVwear
makeup593NNmakeup
was594VBDbe
reachable595JJreachable
under596INunder
Title597NPTitle
VII598NPVII
.599SENT.
If600INif
you601PPyou
had602VHDhave
asked603VVNask
members604NNSmember
of605INof
Congress606NPCongress
then607RBthen
what608WPwhat
they609PPthey
had610VHDhave
thought611VVNthink
,612,,
they613PPthey
would614MDwould
not615RBnot
have616VHhave
been617VBNbe
thinking618VVGthink
about619INabout
women620NNSwoman
like621INlike
Ann622NPAnn
Hopkins623NPHopkins
.624SENT.
They625PPthey
...626:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]627LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
How628WRBHow
do629VVPdo
you630PPyou
...631:...
do632VVPdo
you633PPyou
agree634VVPagree
or635CCor
disagree636VVPdisagree
with637INwith
Judge638NPJudge
Posner639NPPosner
's640POS's
statement641NNstatement
that642IN/thatthat
the643DTthe
statute644NNstatute
should645MDshould
be646VBbe
read647VVNread
to648TOto
encompass649VVencompass
sexual650JJsexual
orientation651NNorientation
discrimination652NNdiscrimination
to653TOto
"654``"
avoid655VVavoid
placing656VVGplace
the657DTthe
entire658JJentire
burden659NNburden
of660INof
updating661VVGupdate
old662JJold
statutes663NNSstatute
on664INon
the665DTthe
legislative666JJlegislative
branch667NNbranch
"668''"
?669SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]670LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I671PPI
disagree672VVPdisagree
with673INwith
Judge674NPJudge
Posner675NPPosner
.676SENT.
I677PPI
do678VVPdo
n't679RBn't
think680VVthink
you681PPyou
need682VVPneed
to683TOto
do684VVdo
any685DTany
updating686VVGupdate
here687RBhere
.688SENT.
I689PPI
think690VVPthink
you691PPyou
should692MDshould
read693VVread
the694DTthe
words695NNSword
as696INas
they697PPthey
were698VBDbe
understood699VVNunderstand
then700RBthen
,701,,
which702WDTwhich
is703VBZbe
men704NNSman
and705CCand
women706NNSwoman
.707SENT.
Title708NPTitle
VII709NPVII
was710VBDbe
intended711VVNintend
to712TOto
make713VVmake
sure714JJsure
that715IN/thatthat
men716NNSman
were717VBDbe
not718RBnot
disadvantaged719VVNdisadvantage
relative720JJrelative
to721TOto
women722NNSwoman
and723CCand
women724NNSwoman
were725VBDbe
not726RBnot
disadvantaged727VVNdisadvantage
relative728JJrelative
to729TOto
men730NNSman
.731SENT.
And732CCand
when733WRBwhen
you734PPyou
tell735VVPtell
two736CDtwo
employees737NNSemployee
who738WPwho
come739VVPcome
in740INin
,741,,
both742CCboth
of743INof
whom744WPwhom
tell745VVPtell
you746PPyou
they747PPthey
married748VVDmarry
their749PP$their
partner750NNpartner
Bill751NPBill
last752JJlast
weekend753NNweekend
,754,,
when755WRBwhen
you756PPyou
fire757VVfire
the758DTthe
male759JJmale
employee760NNemployee
who761WPwho
married762VVDmarry
Bill763NPBill
and764CCand
you765PPyou
give766VVPgive
the767DTthe
female768JJfemale
employee769NNemployee
who770WPwho
married771VVDmarry
Bill772NPBill
a773DTa
couple774NNcouple
of775INof
days776NNSday
off777INoff
so778RBso
she779PPshe
can780MDcan
celebrate781VVcelebrate
the782DTthe
joyous783JJjoyous
event784NNevent
,785,,
that786WDTthat
's787VBZbe
discrimination788NNdiscrimination
because789INbecause
of790INof
sex791NNsex
.792SENT.
Well793UHwell
,794,,
if795INif
no796DTno
one797CDone
has798VHZhave
any799DTany
further800JJRfurther
questions801NNSquestion
,802,,
I803PPI
'll804MDwill
reserve805VVreserve
the806DTthe
remainder807NNremainder
of808INof
my809PP$my
time810NNtime
for811INfor
rebuttal812NNrebuttal
.813SENT.
[814SYM[
LAUGHTER815NNlaughter
]816SYM]
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]817LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well818UHwell
,819,,
I820PPI
think821VVPthink
we822PPwe
'll823MDwill
have824VHhave
further825JJRfurther
questions826NNSquestion
.827SENT.
[828SYM[
LAUGHTER829NNlaughter
]830SYM]
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]831LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
What832WPWhat
do833VVPdo
you834PPyou
do835VVPdo
with836INwith
the837DTthe
argument838NNargument
that839IN/thatthat
this840DTthis
is841VBZbe
a842DTa
non-discriminatory843JJnon-discriminatory
policy844NNpolicy
because845INbecause
it846PPit
applies847VVZapply
equally848RBequally
to849TOto
relationships850NNSrelationship
between851INbetween
women852NNSwoman
and853CCand
relationships854NNSrelationship
between855INbetween
men856NNSman
?857SENT?
In858INin
other859JJother
words860NNSword
,861,,
your862PP$your
friends863NNSfriend
on864INon
the865DTthe
...866:...
or867CCor
...868:...
or869CCor
you870PPyou
emphasize871VVPemphasize
that872IN/thatthat
you873PPyou
need874VVPneed
to875TOto
know876VVknow
the877DTthe
sex878NNsex
of879INof
the880DTthe
individuals881NNSindividual
involved882VVNinvolve
before883INbefore
you884PPyou
can885MDcan
determine886VVdetermine
whether887INwhether
or888CCor
not889RBnot
there890EXthere
's891VBZbe
a892DTa
violation893NNviolation
and894CCand
that895DTthat
that896WDTthat
brings897VVZbring
it898PPit
within899INwithin
Title900NPTitle
VII901NPVII
.902SENT.
But903CCbut
what904WPwhat
about905INabout
the906DTthe
response907NNresponse
that908IN/thatthat
you909PPyou
do910VVPdo
not911RBnot
need912VVneed
to913TOto
know914VVknow
the915DTthe
sex916NNsex
of917INof
the918DTthe
people919NNSpeople
involved920VVNinvolve
;921:;
you922PPyou
just923RBjust
can924MDcan
have925VHhave
a926DTa
policy927NNpolicy
against928INagainst
same929JJsame
sex930NNsex
?931SENT?
So932RBso
you933PPyou
do934VVPdo
n't935RBn't
care936VVcare
whether937INwhether
the938DTthe
participants939NNSparticipant
are940VBPbe
women941NNSwoman
or942CCor
men943NNSman
.944SENT.
If945INif
they946PPthey
're947VBPbe
the948DTthe
same949JJsame
,950,,
then951RBthen
that952DTthat
's953VBZbe
covered954VVNcover
by955INby
the956DTthe
policy957NNpolicy
.958SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]959LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I960PPI
think961VVPthink
that962WDTthat
's963VBZbe
no964RBno
different965JJdifferent
than966INthan
having967VHGhave
a968DTa
policy969NNpolicy
that970WDTthat
says971VVZsay
everyone972NNeveryone
should973MDshould
comply974VVcomply
with975INwith
the976DTthe
stereotype977NNstereotype
applicable978JJapplicable
to979TOto
their980PP$their
sex981NNsex
.982SENT.
And983CCand
if984INif
I985PPI
can986MDcan
use987VVuse
an988DTan
example989NNexample
from990INfrom
the991DTthe
Court992NPCourt
's993POS's
prior994JJprior
cases995NNScase
,996,,
for997INfor
example998NNexample
,999,,
in1000INin
Dothard1001NPDothard
against1002INagainst
Rawlinson1003NPRawlinson
,1004,,
the1005DTthe
policy1006NNpolicy
on1007INon
its1008PP$its
face1009NNface
said1010VVDsay
you1011PPyou
cannot1012MDcan
guard1013VVguard
someone1014NNsomeone
of1015INof
the1016DTthe
opposite1017JJopposite
sex1018NNsex
.1019SENT.
So1020INso
a1021DTa
woman1022NNwoman
who1023WPwho
seeks1024VVZseek
to1025TOto
guard1026VVguard
a1027DTa
man1028NNman
is1029VBZbe
barred1030VVNbar
from1031INfrom
that1032DTthat
job1033NNjob
;1034:;
a1035DTa
man1036NNman
who1037WPwho
seeks1038VVZseek
to1039TOto
guard1040VVguard
a1041DTa
woman1042NNwoman
is1043VBZbe
barred1044VVNbar
from1045INfrom
that1046DTthat
job1047NNjob
.1048SENT.
Just1049RBjust
put1050VVNput
in1051INin
,1052,,
instead1053RBinstead
of1054INof
the1055DTthe
word1056NNword
"1057``"
guard1058NNguard
,1059,,
"1060''"
"1061``"
date1062NNdate
"1063''"
and1064CCand
you1065PPyou
get1066VVPget
the1067DTthe
same1068JJsame
kind1069NNkind
of1070INof
rule1071NNrule
here1072RBhere
,1073,,
which1074WDTwhich
is1075VBZbe
a1076DTa
man1077NNman
who1078WPwho
wants1079VVZwant
to1080TOto
date1081VVdate
a1082DTa
man1083NNman
can1084MDcan
't1085RB't
do1086VVdo
it1087PPit
but1088CCbut
a1089DTa
woman1090NNwoman
can1091MDcan
,1092,,
and1093CCand
a1094DTa
woman1095NNwoman
who1096WPwho
wants1097VVZwant
to1098TOto
date1099VVdate
a1100DTa
woman1101NNwoman
can1102MDcan
't1103RB't
do1104VVdo
it1105PPit
...1106:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]1107LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But1108CCbut
there1109EXthere
's1110VBZbe
,1111,,
Ms1112NNMs
...1113:...
.1114SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]1115LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...1116:...
but1117CCbut
a1118DTa
man1119NNman
can1120MDcan
.1121SENT.
They1122PPthey
are1123VBPbe
two1124CDtwo
forms1125NNSform
of1126INof
discrimination1127NNdiscrimination
.1128SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]1129LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Ms1130NNMs
.1131SENT.
Karlan1132NPKarlan
,1133,,
there1134EXthere
's1135VBZbe
quite1136RBquite
a1137DTa
difference1138NNdifference
.1139SENT.
In1140INin
the1141DTthe
Dothard1142NPDothard
case1143NNcase
,1144,,
it1145PPit
was1146VBDbe
the1147DTthe
disparate1148JJdisparate
impact1149NNimpact
.1150SENT.
There1151EXthere
are1152VBPbe
many1153JJmany
more1154JJRmore
male1155JJmale
prisoners1156NNSprisoner
to1157TOto
guard1158VVguard
than1159INthan
females1160NNSfemale
.1161SENT.
So1162INso
that1163DTthat
policy1164NNpolicy
,1165,,
even1166RBeven
though1167INthough
it1168PPit
applied1169VVDapply
to1170TOto
men1171NNSman
guarding1172VVGguard
women1173NNSwoman
,1174,,
it1175PPit
had1176VHDhave
a1177DTa
disproportionate1178JJdisproportionate
effect1179NNeffect
on1180INon
women1181NNSwoman
who1182WPwho
wanted1183VVDwant
to1184TOto
be1185VBbe
guards1186NNSguard
because1187INbecause
there1188EXthere
were1189VBDbe
many1190JJmany
more1191JJRmore
jobs1192NNSjob
guarding1193VVGguard
male1194JJmale
prisoners1195NNSprisoner
than1196INthan
female1197JJfemale
prisoners1198NNSprisoner
.1199SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]1200LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Justice1201NPJustice
Ginsburg1202NPGinsburg
,1203,,
the1204DTthe
part1205NNpart
of1206INof
Dothard1207NPDothard
against1208INagainst
Rawlinson1209NPRawlinson
that1210WDTthat
rested1211VVDrest
on1212INon
disparate1213JJdisparate
impact1214NNimpact
was1215VBDbe
the1216DTthe
height1217NNheight
and1218CCand
weight1219NNweight
requirements1220NNSrequirement
.1221SENT.
The1222DTthe
requirement1223NNrequirement
about1224INabout
guarding1225VVGguard
the1226DTthe
opposite1227JJopposite
sex1228NNsex
was1229VBDbe
not1230RBnot
a1231DTa
disparate1232JJdisparate
impact1233NNimpact
.1234SENT.
At1235INat
most1236JJSmost
,1237,,
the1238DTthe
Court1239NPCourt
noted1240VVDnote
in1241INin
a1242DTa
footnote1243NNfootnote
along1244INalong
the1245DTthe
way1246NNway
that1247IN/thatthat
there1248EXthere
were1249VBDbe
more1250JJRmore
guard1251NNguard
positions1252NNSposition
available1253JJavailable
to1254TOto
men1255NNSman
,1256,,
but1257CCbut
it1258PPit
was1259VBDbe
not1260RBnot
a1261DTa
disparate1262JJdisparate
impact1263NNimpact
case1264NNcase
.1265SENT.
It1266PPit
was1267VBDbe
a1268DTa
disparate1269JJdisparate
treatment1270NNtreatment
case1271NNcase
.1272SENT.
And1273CCand
so1274RBso
a1275DTa
male1276JJmale
person1277NNperson
who1278WPwho
had1279VHDhave
wanted1280VVNwant
to1281TOto
guard1282VVguard
someone1283NNsomeone
at1284INat
the1285DTthe
Julia1286NPJulia
Tutwiler1287NPTutwiler
prison1288NNprison
,1289,,
the1290DTthe
prison1291NNprison
for1292INfor
women1293NNSwoman
in1294INin
Alabama1295NPAlabama
,1296,,
would1297MDwould
have1298VHhave
had1299VHNhave
a1300DTa
claim1301NNclaim
that1302IN/thatthat
he1303PPhe
had1304VHDhave
been1305VBNbe
discriminated1306VVNdiscriminate
against1307INagainst
because1308INbecause
of1309INof
sex1310NNsex
.1311SENT.
Now1312RBnow
,1313,,
he1314PPhe
would1315MDwould
have1316VHhave
lost1317VVNlose
that1318DTthat
claim1319NNclaim
but1320CCbut
on1321INon
BFOQ1322NPBFOQ
grounds1323NNSground
,1324,,
not1325RBnot
on1326INon
because1327INbecause
of1328INof
sex1329NNsex
grounds1330NNSground
.1331SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]1332LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
What1333WPWhat
do1334VVPdo
you1335PPyou
do1336VVPdo
with1337INwith
the1338DTthe
...1339:...
the1340DTthe
example1341NNexample
that1342WDTthat
was1343VBDbe
brought1344VVNbring
up1345RPup
that1346IN/thatthat
,1347,,
unlike1348INunlike
race1349NNrace
,1350,,
there1351EXthere
are1352VBPbe
certain1353JJcertain
distinctions1354NNSdistinction
that1355WDTthat
are1356VBPbe
not1357RBnot
only1358RBonly
permitted1359VVNpermit
but1360CCbut
maybe1361RBmaybe
even1362RBeven
required1363VVNrequire
between1364INbetween
males1365NNSmale
and1366CCand
females1367NNSfemale
,1368,,
like1369INlike
physical1370JJphysical
fitness1371NNfitness
tests1372NNStest
?1373SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]1374LOC[MS. KARLAN]
So1375INso
those1376DTthose
...1377:...
I1378PPI
want1379VVPwant
to1380TOto
answer1381VVanswer
that1382DTthat
question1383NNquestion
in1384INin
two1385CDtwo
parts1386NNSpart
.1387SENT.
The1388DTthe
first1389JJfirst
is1390VBZbe
to1391TOto
notice1392VVnotice
that1393IN/thatthat
in1394INin
those1395DTthose
cases1396NNScase
,1397,,
there1398EXthere
is1399VBZbe
no1400DTno
question1401NNquestion
there1402EXthere
's1403VBZbe
a1404DTa
differential1405NNdifferential
between1406INbetween
men1407NNSman
and1408CCand
women1409NNSwoman
;1410:;
that1411WDTthat
is1412VBZbe
,1413,,
men1414NNSman
and1415CCand
women1416NNSwoman
are1417VBPbe
being1418VBGbe
treated1419VVNtreat
differently1420RBdifferently
.1421SENT.
What1422WPWhat
is1423VBZbe
at1424INat
issue1425NNissue
there1426EXthere
is1427VBZbe
whether1428INwhether
that1429DTthat
differential1430JJdifferential
treatment1431NNtreatment
constitutes1432VVZconstitute
unlawful1433JJunlawful
discrimination1434NNdiscrimination
under1435INunder
Title1436NPTitle
VII1437NPVII
.1438SENT.
So1439RBso
,1440,,
for1441INfor
example1442NNexample
,1443,,
in1444INin
Johnson1445NPJohnson
against1446INagainst
Santa1447NPSanta
Clara1448NPClara
County1449NPCounty
Transportation1450NPTransportation
Agency1451NPAgency
,1452,,
everyone1453NNeveryone
recognized1454VVDrecognize
Paul1455NPPaul
Johnson1456NPJohnson
was1457VBDbe
denied1458VVNdeny
the1459DTthe
job1460NNjob
because1461INbecause
of1462INof
his1463PP$his
sex1464NNsex
,1465,,
but1466CCbut
because1467INbecause
it1468PPit
was1469VBDbe
a1470DTa
permissible1471JJpermissible
affirmative1472JJaffirmative
action1473NNaction
program1474NNprogram
,1475,,
that1476WDTthat
was1477VBDbe
okay1478JJokay
.1479SENT.
In1480INin
Dothard1481NPDothard
against1482INagainst
Rawlinson1483NPRawlinson
,1484,,
this1485DTthis
Court1486NPCourt
said1487VVDsay
Ms1488NNMs
.1489SENT.
Rawlinson1490NPRawlinson
is1491VBZbe
discriminated1492VVNdiscriminate
against1493INagainst
because1494INbecause
of1495INof
sex1496NNsex
,1497,,
but1498CCbut
there1499EXthere
's1500VBZbe
a1501DTa
BFOQ1502NPBFOQ
.1503SENT.
So1504RBso
if1505INif
Congress1506NPCongress
writes1507VVZwrite
an1508DTan
exemption1509NNexemption
into1510INinto
the1511DTthe
statute1512NNstatute
,1513,,
that1514WDTthat
's1515VBZbe
one1516CDone
thing1517NNthing
.1518SENT.
But1519CCbut
this1520DTthis
Court1521NPCourt
really1522RBreally
should1523MDshould
n't1524RBn't
be1525VBbe
writing1526VVGwrite
in1527INin
an1528DTan
exemption1529NNexemption
for1530INfor
those1531DTthose
purposes1532NNSpurpose
.1533SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1534LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Do1535VVPdo
you1536PPyou
think1537VVPthink
we1538PPwe
need1539VVPneed
exemptions1540NNSexemption
for1541INfor
those1542DTthose
BFOQs1543NPBFOQs
?1544SENT?
It1545PPit
's1546VBZbe
not1547RBnot
just1548RBjust
the1549DTthe
...1550:...
physical1551JJphysical
fitness1552NNfitness
standards1553NNSstandard
for1554INfor
different1555JJdifferent
sports1556NNSsport
,1557,,
but1558CCbut
big1559JJbig
issue1560NNissue
right1561RBright
now1562RBnow
raging1563VVGrage
the1564DTthe
country1565NNcountry
is1566VBZbe
bathroom1567NNbathroom
usage1568NNusage
.1569SENT.
Same-sex1570NPSame-sex
bathroom1571NNbathroom
usage1572NNusage
.1573SENT.
How1574WRBHow
are1575VBPbe
those1576DTthose
cases1577NNScase
going1578VVGgo
to1579TOto
be1580VBbe
dealt1581VVNdeal
with1582INwith
absent1583JJabsent
a1584DTa
congressional1585JJcongressional
exemption1586NNexemption
other1587JJother
than1588INthan
BFOQ1589NPBFOQ
?1590SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]1591LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Well1592UHwell
,1593,,
I1594PPI
think1595VVPthink
the1596DTthe
way1597NNway
that1598IN/thatthat
they1599PPthey
get1600VVPget
dealt1601VVNdeal
with1602INwith
is1603VBZbe
everybody1604NNeverybody
agrees1605VVZagree
if1606INif
you1607PPyou
have1608VHPhave
men1609NNSman
's1610POS's
bathrooms1611NNSbathroom
and1612CCand
women1613NNSwoman
's1614POS's
bathrooms1615NNSbathroom
,1616,,
that1617WDTthat
's1618VBZbe
because1619INbecause
of1620INof
sex1621NNsex
.1622SENT.
It1623PPit
treats1624VVZtreat
men1625NNSman
one1626CDone
way1627NNway
,1628,,
it1629PPit
says1630VVZsay
go1631VVgo
to1632TOto
this1633DTthis
bathroom1634NNbathroom
.1635SENT.
It1636PPit
treats1637VVZtreat
women1638NNSwoman
another1639DTanother
way1640NNway
,1641,,
it1642PPit
says1643VVZsay
go1644VVgo
to1645TOto
this1646DTthis
bathroom1647NNbathroom
.1648SENT.
Then1649RBthen
the1650DTthe
question1651NNquestion
becomes1652VVZbecome
is1653VBZbe
that1654IN/thatthat
permissible1655JJpermissible
to1656TOto
do1657VVdo
?1658SENT?
And1659CCand
if1660INif
I1661PPI
could1662MDcould
just1663RBjust
begin1664VVbegin
with1665INwith
an1666DTan
example1667NNexample
that1668IN/thatthat
I1669PPI
think1670VVPthink
will1671MDwill
show1672VVshow
why1673WRBwhy
this1674DTthis
is1675VBZbe
so1676RBso
.1677SENT.
When1678WRBwhen
I1679PPI
got1680VVDget
up1681RPup
,1682,,
the1683DTthe
Chief1684NPChief
Justice1685NPJustice
said1686VVDsay
to1687TOto
me1688PPme
,1689,,
"1690''"
Ms1691NNMs
.1692SENT.
"1693''"
Karlan1694NPKarlan
,1695,,
I1696PPI
am1697VBPbe
willing1698JJwilling
to1699TOto
bet1700VVbet
any1701DTany
amount1702NNamount
of1703INof
money1704NNmoney
I1705PPI
have1706VHPhave
that1707DTthat
when1708WRBwhen
Mr1709NPMr
.1710SENT.
Harris1711NPHarris
gets1712VVZget
up1713RPup
,1714,,
he1715PPhe
is1716VBZbe
going1717VVGgo
to1718TOto
say1719VVsay
"1720``"
Mr1721NPMr
.1722SENT.
"1723``"
Harris1724NPHarris
.1725SENT.
He1726PPhe
has1727VHZhave
treated1728VVNtreat
us1729PPus
differently1730RBdifferently
because1731INbecause
of1732INof
sex1733NNsex
.1734SENT.
But1735CCbut
that1736DTthat
's1737VBZbe
not1738RBnot
discriminatory1739JJdiscriminatory
because1740INbecause
neither1741CCneither
of1742INof
us1743PPus
has1744VHZhave
been1745VBNbe
subjected1746VVNsubject
to1747TOto
a1748DTa
disadvantage1749NNdisadvantage
.1750SENT.
And1751CCand
as1752INas
this1753DTthis
Court1754NPCourt
said1755VVDsay
in1756INin
Burlington1757NPBurlington
White1758NPWhite
against1759INagainst
North1760NPNorth
...1761:...
Burlington1762NPBurlington
Northern1763NPNorthern
against1764INagainst
White1765NPWhite
,1766,,
what1767WPwhat
the1768DTthe
statute1769NNstatute
means1770VVZmean
when1771WRBwhen
it1772PPit
says1773VVZsay
"1774``"
discriminate1775JJdiscriminate
against1776INagainst
"1777``"
is1778VBZbe
to1779TOto
cause1780VVcause
an1781DTan
injury1782NNinjury
and1783CCand
requiring1784VVGrequire
people1785NNSpeople
generally1786RBgenerally
to1787TOto
use1788VVuse
separate1789JJseparate
bathrooms1790NNSbathroom
is1791VBZbe
not1792RBnot
an1793DTan
injury1794NNinjury
.1795SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1796LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well1797UHWell
,1798,,
I'm1799NPI'm
...1800:...
I1801PPI
'm1802VBPbe
not1803RBnot
sure1804JJsure
that1805IN/thatthat
maybe1806RBmaybe
how1807WRBhow
they1808PPthey
would1809MDwould
see1810VVsee
it1811PPit
.1812SENT.
And1813CCand
to1814TOto
what1815WPwhat
...1816:...
to1817TOto
what1818WPwhat
extent1819NNextent
should1820MDshould
we1821PPwe
take1822VVtake
that1823IN/thatthat
into1824INinto
account1825NNaccount
?1826SENT?
And1827CCand
same1828JJsame
thing1829NNthing
with1830INwith
a1831DTa
gender-specific1832JJgender-specific
uniform1833NNuniform
requirements1834NNSrequirement
.1835SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]1836LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Sure1837NPSure
.1838SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1839LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
How1840WRBHow
would1841MDwould
you1842PPyou
deal1843VVdeal
with1844INwith
those1845DTthose
,1846,,
given1847VVNgive
that1848DTthat
...1849:...
that1850IN/thatthat
at1851INat
least1852JJSleast
those1853DTthose
affected1854VVNaffect
might1855MDmight
think1856VVthink
that1857IN/thatthat
they1858PPthey
're1859VBPbe
suffering1860VVGsuffer
a1861DTa
harm1862NNharm
?1863SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]1864LOC[MS. KARLAN]
So1865INso
there1866EXthere
's1867VBZbe
no1868DTno
categorical1869JJcategorical
rule1870NNrule
about1871INabout
these1872DTthese
.1873SENT.
For1874INfor
example1875NNexample
,1876,,
the1877DTthe
fact1878NNfact
that1879IN/thatthat
all1880DTall
of1881INof
the1882DTthe
men1883NNSman
sitting1884VVGsit
at1885INat
counsel1886NNcounsel
table1887NNtable
knew1888VVDknow
that1889IN/thatthat
they1890PPthey
had1891VHDhave
to1892TOto
wear1893VVwear
ties1894NNSty
today1895NNtoday
and1896CCand
I1897PPI
was1898VBDbe
free1899JJfree
not1900RBnot
to1901TOto
did1902VVDdo
n't1903RBn't
cause1904VVcause
an1905DTan
injury1906NNinjury
.1907SENT.
On1908INon
the1909DTthe
other1910JJother
hand1911NNhand
,1912,,
even1913RBeven
the1914DTthe
dissenters1915NNSdissenter
in1916INin
the1917DTthe
Second1918NPSecond
Circuit1919NPCircuit
said1920VVDsay
,1921,,
if1922INif
the1923DTthe
Court1924NPCourt
said1925VVDsay
women1926NNSwoman
who1927WPwho
come1928VVPcome
to1929TOto
argue1930VVargue
should1931MDshould
argue1932VVargue
in1933INin
Hooters1934NNShooter
outfits1935NNSoutfit
and1936CCand
the1937DTthe
men1938NNSman
should1939MDshould
wear1940VVwear
...1941:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1942LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
No1943NPNo
...1944:...
[MS. KARLAN]1945LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...1946:...
ties1947NNSty
...1948:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1949LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...1950:...
we1951PPwe
're1952VBPbe
not1953RBnot
...1954:...
we1955PPwe
're1956VBPbe
not1957RBnot
...1958:...
I1959PPI
mean1960VVPmean
...1961:...
[MS. KARLAN]1962LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I1963PPI
know1964VVPknow
.1965SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1966LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...1967:...
we1968PPwe
can1969MDcan
talk1970VVtalk
absurd1971JJabsurd
examples1972NNSexample
...1973:...
[MS. KARLAN]1974LOC[MS. KARLAN]
No1975NPNo
,1976,,
but1977CCbut
I1978PPI
can1979MDcan
...1980:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]1981LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...1982:...
or1983CCor
we1984PPwe
can1985MDcan
talk1986VVtalk
real1987JJreal
world1988NNworld
examples1989NNSexample
.1990SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]1991LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I1992PPI
will1993MDwill
give1994VVgive
you1995PPyou
a1996DTa
real1997JJreal
world1998NNworld
example1999NNexample
,2000,,
which2001WDTwhich
is2002VBZbe
,2003,,
it2004PPit
probably2005RBprobably
does2006VVZdo
n't2007RBn't
violate2008VVviolate
dress2009NNdress
code2010NNcode
to2011TOto
require2012VVrequire
men2013NNSman
and2014CCand
women2015NNSwoman
in2016INin
business2017NNbusiness
events2018NNSevent
for2019INfor
the2020DTthe
women2021NNSwoman
to2022TOto
wear2023VVwear
skirts2024NNSskirt
,2025,,
but2026CCbut
if2027INif
you2028PPyou
required2029VVDrequire
a2030DTa
telephone2031NNtelephone
lineman2032NNlineman
to2033TOto
wear2034VVwear
a2035DTa
skirt2036NNskirt
...2037:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2038LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
No2039NPNo
,2040,,
no2041RBno
...2042:...
[MS. KARLAN]2043LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...2044:...
while2045INwhile
she2046PPshe
's2047VBZbe
still2048RBstill
...2049:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2050LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I2051PPI
understand2052VVPunderstand
that2053RBthat
.2054SENT.
That2055DTthat
's2056VBZbe
not2057RBnot
what2058WPwhat
I2059PPI
'm2060VBPbe
getting2061VVGget
at2062INat
.2063SENT.
And2064CCand
you2065PPyou
know2066VVPknow
what2067WPwhat
I2068PPI
'm2069VBPbe
getting2070VVGget
at2071INat
.2072SENT.
The2073DTthe
funeral2074JJfuneral
homes2075NNShome
example2076NNexample
's2077VBZbe
not2078RBnot
a2079DTa
bad2080JJbad
...2081:...
the2082DTthe
case2083NNcase
that2084IN/thatthat
we2085PPwe
're2086VBPbe
about2087RBabout
to2088TOto
take2089VVtake
up2090RPup
is2091VBZbe
...2092:...
is2093VBZbe
...2094:...
is2095VBZbe
more2096JJRmore
in2097INin
the2098DTthe
...2099:...
in2100INin
the2101DTthe
realm2102NNrealm
of2103INof
my2104PP$my
question2105NNquestion
.2106SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]2107LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Okay2108NPOkay
.2109SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2110LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
You2111PPyou
can2112MDcan
offer2113VVoffer
me2114PPme
help2115VVhelp
if2116INif
you2117PPyou
want2118VVPwant
to2119TOto
.2120SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]2121LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yes2122UHyes
,2123,,
yes2124UHyes
.2125SENT.
No2126UHNo
,2127,,
I2128PPI
'm2129VBPbe
trying2130VVGtry
to2131TOto
offer2132VVoffer
you2133PPyou
help2134VVhelp
.2135SENT.
What2136WPWhat
I2137PPI
'm2138VBPbe
trying2139VVGtry
to2140TOto
say2141VVsay
...2142:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2143LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
All2144DTall
right2145NNright
.2146SENT.
What2147WPWhat
I'm2148NPI'm
...2149:...
what2150WPwhat
I2151PPI
'm2152VBPbe
suggesting2153VVGsuggest
,2154,,
counsel2155NNcounsel
,2156,,
is2157VBZbe
that2158IN/thatthat
there2159EXthere
are2160VBPbe
male2161JJmale
and2162CCand
female2163JJfemale
bathrooms2164NNSbathroom
,2165,,
there2166EXthere
are2167VBPbe
dress2168NNdress
codes2169NNScode
that2170WDTthat
are2171VBPbe
otherwise2172RBotherwise
innocuous2173JJinnocuous
,2174,,
right2175RBright
,2176,,
most2177JJSmost
...2178:...
most2179JJSmost
people2180NNSpeople
would2181MDwould
find2182VVfind
them2183PPthem
innocuous2184JJinnocuous
.2185SENT.
But2186CCbut
the2187DTthe
affected2188JJaffected
communities2189NNScommunity
will2190MDwill
not2191RBnot
.2192SENT.
And2193CCand
they2194PPthey
will2195MDwill
find2196VVfind
harm2197NNharm
.2198SENT.
And2199CCand
how2200WRBhow
does2201VVZdo
your2202PP$your
test2203NNtest
deal2204NNdeal
with2205INwith
that2206DTthat
one2207CDone
way2208NNway
or2209CCor
the2210DTthe
other2211JJother
?2212SENT?
That2213DTthat
's2214VBZbe
what2215WPwhat
I2216PPI
'm2217VBPbe
asking2218VVGask
you2219PPyou
to2220TOto
address2221VVaddress
,2222,,
if2223INif
you2224PPyou
'd2225MDwould
like2226VVlike
to2227TOto
.2228SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]2229LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yes2230NPYes
.2231SENT.
My2232PP$my
test2233NNtest
says2234VVZsay
that2235IN/thatthat
you2236PPyou
have2237VHPhave
treated2238VVNtreat
the2239DTthe
people2240NNSpeople
differently2241RBdifferently
because2242INbecause
of2243INof
sex2244NNsex
,2245,,
which2246WDTwhich
is2247VBZbe
what2248WPwhat
we2249PPwe
are2250VBPbe
asking2251VVGask
you2252PPyou
to2253TOto
hold2254VVhold
here2255RBhere
.2256SENT.
When2257WRBwhen
you2258PPyou
treat2259VVPtreat
a2260DTa
gay2261JJgay
man2262NNman
who2263WPwho
wants2264VVZwant
to2265TOto
date2266VVdate
a2267DTa
woman2268NNwoman
differently2269RBdifferently
than2270INthan
a2271DTa
man2272NNman
...2273:...
woman2274NNwoman
who2275WPwho
wants2276VVZwant
to2277TOto
date2278VVdate
a2279DTa
woman2280NNwoman
,2281,,
that2282WDTthat
...2283:...
that2284WDTthat
's2285VBZbe
discrimination2286NNdiscrimination
.2287SENT.
Then2288RBthen
you2289PPyou
get2290VVPget
to2291TOto
what2292WPwhat
I2293PPI
've2294VHPhave
said2295VVNsay
,2296,,
which2297WDTwhich
is2298VBZbe
you2299PPyou
have2300VHPhave
to2301TOto
ask2302VVask
whether2303INwhether
a2304DTa
reasonable2305JJreasonable
person2306NNperson
under2307INunder
these2308DTthese
circumstances2309NNScircumstance
would2310MDwould
be2311VBbe
injured2312VVNinjure
by2313INby
the2314DTthe
imposition2315NNimposition
of2316INof
the2317DTthe
particular2318JJparticular
sex-specific2319JJsex-specific
world2320NNworld
.2321SENT.
So2322RBso
when2323WRBwhen
the2324DTthe
Chief2325NPChief
Justice2326NPJustice
calls2327VVZcall
me2328PPme
Ms2329NNMs
.2330SENT.
,2331,,
I2332PPI
am2333VBPbe
not2334RBnot
injured2335VVNinjure
.2336SENT.
When2337WRBwhen
I2338PPI
go2339VVPgo
to2340TOto
a2341DTa
...2342:...
when2343WRBwhen
I2344PPI
...2345:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2346LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
You2347PPyou
are2348VBPbe
not2349RBnot
,2350,,
but2351CCbut
another2352DTanother
...2353:...
[MS. KARLAN]2354LOC[MS. KARLAN]
It2355PPit
...2356:...
it2357PPit
...2358:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2359LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...2360:...
person2361NNperson
might2362MDmight
be2363VBbe
.2364SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]2365LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Right2366RBright
.2367SENT.
And2368CCand
the2369DTthe
question2370NNquestion
...2371:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2372LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Are2373VBPbe
they2374PPthey
reasonable2375JJreasonable
or2376CCor
not2377RBnot
?2378SENT?
And2379CCand
...2380:...
and2381CCand
I'm2382NPI'm
...2383:...
I'm2384NNI'm
...2385:...
I2386PPI
'm2387VBPbe
just2388RBjust
...2389:...
I2390PPI
'm2391VBPbe
wondering2392VVGwonder
,2393,,
how2394WRBhow
do2395VVPdo
you2396PPyou
decide2397VVdecide
those2398DTthose
cases2399NNScase
?2400SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]2401LOC[MS. KARLAN]
An2402DTan
idiosyncratic2403JJidiosyncratic
preference2404NNpreference
does2405VVZdo
not2406RBnot
void2407VVvoid
an2408DTan
otherwise2409RBotherwise
valid2410JJvalid
dress2411NNdress
code2412NNcode
or2413CCor
bathroom2414NNbathroom
rule2415NNrule
.2416SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2417LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
So2418RBso
is2419VBZbe
it2420PPit
...2421:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2422LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Ms2423NNMs
.2424SENT.
Karlan2425NPKarlan
...2426:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2427LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I2428PPI
'm2429VBPbe
sorry2430JJsorry
.2431SENT.
I2432PPI
...2433:...
I2434PPI
...2435:...
I2436PPI
...2437:...
and2438CCand
I2439PPI
apologize2440VVPapologize
.2441SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2442LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Go2443NPGo
ahead2444RBahead
and2445CCand
finish2446VVfinish
it2447PPit
.2448SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2449LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Is2450VBZbe
it2451PPit
idiosyncratic2452JJidiosyncratic
for2453INfor
a2454DTa
transgender2455NNtransgender
person2456NNperson
to2457TOto
prefer2458VVprefer
a2459DTa
bathroom2460NNbathroom
that2461WDTthat
's2462VBZbe
different2463JJdifferent
than2464INthan
the2465DTthe
...2466:...
the2467DTthe
one2468CDone
of2469INof
their2470PP$their
biological2471JJbiological
sex2472NNsex
?2473SENT?
Is2474VBZbe
it2475PPit
idiosyncratic2476JJidiosyncratic
for2477INfor
a2478DTa
transsexual2479NNtranssexual
person2480NNperson
to2481TOto
wish2482VVwish
to2483TOto
dress2484VVdress
in2485INin
a2486DTa
different2487JJdifferent
style2488NNstyle
of2489INof
dress2490NNdress
than2491INthan
his2492PP$his
or2493CCor
her2494PP$her
biological2495NNbiological
...2496:...
[MS. KARLAN]2497LOC[MS. KARLAN]
No2498NPNo
.2499SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]2500LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Sex2501NNsex
?2502SENT?
Okay2503JJokay
.2504SENT.
So2505INso
the2506DTthe
answer2507NNanswer
to2508TOto
your2509PP$your
question2510NNquestion
is2511VBZbe
...2512:...
the2513DTthe
question2514NNquestion
then2515RBthen
,2516,,
at2517INat
the2518DTthe
end2519NNend
of2520INof
the2521DTthe
day2522NNday
,2523,,
if2524INif
I2525PPI
understand2526VVPunderstand
it2527PPit
,2528,,
is2529VBZbe
that2530IN/thatthat
those2531DTthose
are2532VBPbe
acts2533NNSact
of2534INof
discrimination2535NNdiscrimination
under2536INunder
Title2537NPTitle
VII2538NPVII
as2539INas
you2540PPyou
understand2541VVPunderstand
it2542PPit
?2543SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]2544LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yes2545NPYes
,2546,,
although2547INalthough
I2548PPI
think2549VVPthink
you'd2550NNyou'd
...2551:...
you2552PPyou
'd2553MDwould
be2554VBbe
better2555RBRwell
advised2556VVNadvise
to2557TOto
ask2558VVask
the2559DTthe
question2560NNquestion
to2561TOto
someone2562NNsomeone
who2563WPwho
...2564:...
who2565WPwho
is2566VBZbe
representing2567VVGrepresent
someone2568NNsomeone
who2569WPwho
is2570VBZbe
transgender2571NNtransgender
.2572SENT.
I2573PPI
am2574VBPbe
representing2575VVGrepresent
someone2576NNsomeone
who2577WPwho
is2578VBZbe
gay2579JJgay
.2580SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2581LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Ms2582NNMs
.2583SENT.
Karlan2584NPKarlan
.2585SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]2586LOC[MS. KARLAN]
And2587CCand
...2588:...
yeah2589RByeah
.2590SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2591LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But2592CCbut
you2593PPyou
're2594VBPbe
begging2595VVGbeg
Justice2596NPJustice
Gorsuch2597NPGorsuch
's2598POS's
question2599NNquestion
.2600SENT.
We2601PPwe
were2602VBDbe
following2603VVGfollow
up2604RPup
on2605INon
the2606DTthe
same2607JJsame
thing2608NNthing
...2609:...
[MS. KARLAN]2610LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I2611PPI
truly2612RBtruly
am2613VBPbe
not2614RBnot
trying2615VVGtry
to2616TOto
...2617:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2618LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...2619:...
which2620WDTwhich
is2621VBZbe
...2622:...
[MS. KARLAN]2623LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...2624:...
beg2625VVbeg
the2626DTthe
question2627NNquestion
.2628SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2629LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...2630:...
how2631WRBhow
do2632VVPdo
we2633PPwe
differentiate2634VVdifferentiate
the2635DTthe
two2636CDtwo
?2637SENT?
What2638WPWhat
is2639VBZbe
the2640DTthe
legal2641JJlegal
test2642NNtest
that2643IN/thatthat
you2644PPyou
propose2645VVPpropose
to2646TOto
say2647VVsay
this2648DTthis
is2649VBZbe
discrimination2650NNdiscrimination
because2651INbecause
of2652INof
sex2653NNsex
,2654,,
as2655INas
you2656PPyou
said2657VVDsay
,2658,,
calling2659VVGcall
you2660PPyou
one2661CDone
thing2662NNthing
and2663CCand
your2664PP$your
friend2665NNfriend
another2666DTanother
is2667VBZbe
discriminatory2668JJdiscriminatory
,2669,,
but2670CCbut
it2671PPit
's2672VBZbe
okay2673JJokay
because2674INbecause
there2675EXthere
's2676VBZbe
no2677DTno
harm2678NNharm
.2679SENT.
So2680RBso
what2681WPwhat
's2682VBZbe
the2683DTthe
test2684NNtest
we2685PPwe
apply2686VVPapply
to2687TOto
,2688,,
say2689VVsay
,2690,,
when2691WRBwhen
it2692PPit
is2693VBZbe
harm2694NNharm
and2695CCand
when2696WRBwhen
it2697PPit
is2698VBZbe
n't2699RBn't
?2700SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]2701LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Let2702VVlet
...2703:...
let2704VVlet
me2705PPme
try2706VVtry
to2707TOto
be2708VBbe
clear2709JJclear
.2710SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2711LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Let2712NPLet
's2713POS's
be2714VBbe
...2715:...
[MS. KARLAN]2716LOC[MS. KARLAN]
It2717PPit
's2718VBZbe
not2719RBnot
discrimination2720NNdiscrimination
to2721TOto
call2722VVcall
me2723PPme
Ms2724NNMs
.2725SENT.
Karlan2726NPKarlan
and2727CCand
to2728TOto
call2729VVcall
Mr2730NPMr
.2731SENT.
Harris2732NPHarris
,2733,,
Mr2734NPMr
.2735SENT.
Harris2736NPHarris
.2737SENT.
It2738PPit
is2739VBZbe
...2740:...
it2741PPit
is2742VBZbe
because2743INbecause
of2744INof
sex2745NNsex
that2746IN/thatthat
we2747PPwe
were2748VBDbe
treated2749VVNtreat
differently2750RBdifferently
.2751SENT.
But2752CCbut
as2753INas
this2754DTthis
Court2755NPCourt
has2756VHZhave
made2757VVNmake
it2758PPit
clear2759JJclear
several2760JJseveral
times2761NNStime
,2762,,
discrimination2763NNdiscrimination
consists2764VVZconsist
in2765INin
an2766DTan
injury2767NNinjury
that2768IN/thatthat
the2769DTthe
law2770NNlaw
is2771VBZbe
prepared2772VVNprepare
to2773TOto
recognize2774VVrecognize
.2775SENT.
And2776CCand
generally2777RBgenerally
across2778INacross
all2779DTall
statutes2780NNSstatute
,2781,,
this2782DTthis
is2783VBZbe
n't2784RBn't
a2785DTa
Title2786NPTitle
VII2787NPVII
,2788,,
and2789CCand
this2790DTthis
is2791VBZbe
why2792WRBwhy
I2793PPI
'm2794VBPbe
really2795RBreally
not2796RBnot
begging2797VVGbeg
the2798DTthe
question2799NNquestion
here2800RBhere
,2801,,
the2802DTthe
Court2803NPCourt
has2804VHZhave
said2805VVNsay
de2806NPde
minimis2807NPminimis
effects2808NNSeffect
are2809VBPbe
exempted2810VVNexempt
from2811INfrom
statutes2812NNSstatute
presumptively2813RBpresumptively
.2814SENT.
So2815RBso
if2816INif
this2817DTthis
Court2818NPCourt
thinks2819VVZthink
or2820CCor
if2821INif
another2822DTanother
court2823NNcourt
...2824:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2825LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So2826INso
why2827NNwhy
...2828:...
[MS. KARLAN]2829LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...2830:...
thinks2831VVZthink
...2832:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2833LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...2834:...
is2835VBZbe
a2836DTa
dress2837NNdress
code2838NNcode
for2839INfor
Hooters2840NNShooter
that2841WDTthat
requires2842VVZrequire
all2843DTall
women2844NNSwoman
to2845TOto
wear2846VVwear
a2847DTa
scantily2848RBscantily
...2849:...
a2850DTa
scant2851JJscant
dress2852NNdress
,2853,,
is2854VBZbe
that2855IN/thatthat
discriminatory2856JJdiscriminatory
?2857SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]2858LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yes2859NPYes
,2860,,
it2861PPit
is2862VBZbe
.2863SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2864LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Is2865VBZbe
it2866PPit
discriminatory2867JJdiscriminatory
for2868INfor
the2869DTthe
woman2870NNwoman
who2871WPwho
just2872RBjust
does2873VVZdo
n't2874RBn't
want2875VVwant
to2876TOto
wear2877VVwear
it2878PPit
because2879INbecause
it2880PPit
's2881VBZbe
demeaning2882VVGdemean
?2883SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]2884LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yes2885NPYes
,2886,,
it2887PPit
is2888VBZbe
.2889SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2890LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So2891INso
how2892WRBhow
about2893RBabout
,2894,,
is2895VBZbe
it2896PPit
discriminatory2897JJdiscriminatory
for2898INfor
the2899DTthe
restaurant2900NNrestaurant
not2901RBnot
to2902TOto
hire2903VVhire
a2904DTa
transgender2905NNtransgender
man2906NNman
who2907WPwho
wants2908VVZwant
to2909TOto
wear2910VVwear
the2911DTthe
uniform2912NNuniform
?2913SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]2914LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Well2915UHwell
,2916,,
you2917PPyou
're2918VBPbe
going2919VVGgo
to2920TOto
get2921VVget
...2922:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2923LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
The2924DTthe
scant2925JJscant
uniform2926NNuniform
.2927SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]2928LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I2929PPI
...2930:...
I2931PPI
mean2932VVPmean
,2933,,
I2934PPI
do2935VVPdo
want2936VVwant
to2937TOto
get2938VVget
to2939TOto
the2940DTthe
question2941NNquestion
of2942INof
sexual2943JJsexual
orientation2944NNorientation
...2945:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2946LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
No2947UHNo
,2948,,
no2949UHno
,2950,,
no2951UHno
...2952:...
[MS. KARLAN]2953LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...2954:...
here2955RBhere
,2956,,
but2957CCbut
I2958PPI
understand2959VVPunderstand
...2960:...
I2961PPI
understand2962VVPunderstand
.2963SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2964LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But2965CCbut
I2966PPI
think2967VVPthink
what2968WPwhat
you2969PPyou
're2970VBPbe
alluding2971VVGallude
is2972VBZbe
,2973,,
and2974CCand
I2975PPI
still2976RBstill
have2977VHPhave
n't2978RBn't
heard2979VVNhear
...2980:...
[MS. KARLAN]2981LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yeah2982NPYeah
.2983SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2984LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...2985:...
the2986DTthe
explanation2987NNexplanation
,2988,,
which2989WDTwhich
is2990VBZbe
the2991DTthe
question2992NNquestion
of2993INof
how2994WRBhow
do2995VVPdo
we2996PPwe
tell2997VVtell
what2998WPwhat
's2999VBZbe
actionable3000JJactionable
and3001CCand
not3002RBnot
?3003SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]3004LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Well3005UHWell
,3006,,
if3007INif
...3008:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3009LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
At3010INat
what3011WPwhat
...3012:...
when3013WRBwhen
does3014VVZdo
that3015DTthat
discrimination3016NNdiscrimination
become3017VVbecome
an3018DTan
issue3019NNissue
?3020SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]3021LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I'll3022NPI'll
...3023:...
I3024PPI
'll3025MDwill
give3026VVgive
an3027DTan
analogy3028NNanalogy
from3029INfrom
the3030DTthe
race3031NNrace
area3032NNarea
that3033WDTthat
may3034MDmay
be3035VBbe
helpful3036JJhelpful
to3037TOto
the3038DTthe
Court3039NPCourt
,3040,,
which3041WDTwhich
is3042VBZbe
,3043,,
for3044INfor
many3045JJmany
years3046NNSyear
,3047,,
there3048EXthere
was3049VBDbe
an3050DTan
argument3051NNargument
that3052IN/thatthat
separate3053JJseparate
but3054CCbut
equal3055JJequal
was3056VBDbe
acceptable3057JJacceptable
.3058SENT.
And3059CCand
ultimately3060RBultimately
this3061DTthis
Court3062NPCourt
concluded3063VVDconclude
that3064IN/thatthat
when3065WRBwhen
it3066PPit
came3067VVDcome
to3068TOto
race3069NNrace
,3070,,
separate3071JJseparate
but3072CCbut
equal3073JJequal
was3074VBDbe
not3075RBnot
permissible3076JJpermissible
.3077SENT.
I3078PPI
do3079VVPdo
n't3080RBn't
think3081VVthink
the3082DTthe
Court3083NPCourt
has3084VHZhave
held3085VVNhold
anything3086NNanything
like3087INlike
that3088IN/thatthat
with3089INwith
regard3090NNregard
to3091TOto
sex3092NNsex
,3093,,
but3094CCbut
you3095PPyou
're3096VBPbe
going3097VVGgo
to3098TOto
have3099VHhave
to3100TOto
answer3101VVanswer
that3102DTthat
question3103NNquestion
about3104INabout
dress3105NNdress
codes3106NNScode
regardless3107RBregardless
of3108INof
how3109WRBhow
you3110PPyou
rule3111VVPrule
in3112INin
either3113CCeither
my3114PP$my
case3115NNcase
or3116CCor
in3117INin
Ms3118NNMs
.3119SENT.
Stephens3120NPStephens
'3121POS'
case3122NNcase
because3123INbecause
...3124:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]3125LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Can3126MDcan
I3127PPI
ask3128VVask
...3129:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]3130LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Would3131MDwould
you3132PPyou
say3133VVsay
the3134DTthe
test3135NNtest
is3136VBZbe
is3137VBZbe
the3138DTthe
person3139NNperson
injured3140VVNinjure
?3141SENT?
Yes3142UHyes
,3143,,
it3144PPit
's3145VBZbe
a3146DTa
differential3147NNdifferential
based3148VVNbase
on3149INon
gender3150NNgender
,3151,,
but3152CCbut
most3153JJSmost
people3154NNSpeople
are3155VBPbe
not3156RBnot
injured3157VVNinjure
by3158INby
having3159VHGhave
separate3160JJseparate
bathrooms3161NNSbathroom
.3162SENT.
In3163INin
fact3164NNfact
,3165,,
they3166PPthey
...3167:...
most3168JJSmost
people3169NNSpeople
would3170MDwould
prefer3171VVprefer
it3172PPit
.3173SENT.
So3174RBso
are3175VBPbe
you3176PPyou
saying3177VVGsay
that3178IN/thatthat
we3179PPwe
have3180VHPhave
to3181TOto
wait3182VVwait
for3183INfor
the3184DTthe
testing3185NNtesting
case3186NNcase
for3187INfor
the3188DTthe
person3189NNperson
who3190WPwho
might3191MDmight
be3192VBbe
injured3193VVNinjure
by3194INby
not3195RBnot
being3196VBGbe
allowed3197VVNallow
to3198TOto
use3199VVuse
the3200DTthe
bathroom3201NNbathroom
of3202INof
the3203DTthe
other3204JJother
sex3205NNsex
?3206SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]3207LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I3208PPI
think3209VVPthink
it3210PPit
highly3211RBhighly
unlikely3212JJunlikely
you3213PPyou
're3214VBPbe
going3215VVGgo
to3216TOto
see3217VVsee
cases3218NNScase
like3219INlike
that3220DTthat
.3221SENT.
The3222DTthe
bathroom3223NNbathroom
issue3224NNissue
has3225VHZhave
been3226VBNbe
around3227RBaround
since3228INsince
the3229DTthe
beginning3230NNbeginning
of3231INof
Title3232NPTitle
VII3233NPVII
.3234SENT.
Title3235NPTitle
VII3236NPVII
has3237VHZhave
a3238DTa
special3239JJspecial
provision3240NNprovision
in3241INin
7033242CD@card@
(3243((
a3244DTa
)3245))
(3246((
ii3247NNii
)3248))
that3249WDTthat
says3250VVZsay
,3251,,
when3252WRBwhen
you3253PPyou
segregate3254VVPsegregate
people3255NNSpeople
,3256,,
the3257DTthe
question3258NNquestion
is3259VBZbe
whether3260INwhether
that3261DTthat
segregation3262NNsegregation
denies3263VVZdeny
them3264PPthem
employment3265NNemployment
opportunities3266NNSopportunity
.3267SENT.
And3268CCand
it3269PPit
is3270VBZbe
hard3271JJhard
to3272TOto
see3273VVsee
,3274,,
quite3275RBquite
honestly3276RBhonestly
,3277,,
how3278WRBhow
requiring3279VVGrequire
men3280NNSman
to3281TOto
use3282VVuse
a3283DTa
men3284NNSman
's3285POS's
room3286NNroom
and3287CCand
women3288NNSwoman
to3289TOto
use3290VVuse
a3291DTa
women3292NNSwoman
's3293POS's
room3294NNroom
denies3295VVZdeny
them3296PPthem
employment3297NNemployment
opportunities3298NNSopportunity
.3299SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]3300LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
May3301MDmay
I3302PPI
ask3303VVask
you3304PPyou
to3305TOto
...3306:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3307LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Are3308VBPbe
these3309DTthese
...3310:...
Justice3311NPJustice
Alito3312NPAlito
.3313SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]3314LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
May3315MDmay
I3316PPI
ask3317VVask
you3318PPyou
to3319TOto
respond3320VVrespond
to3321TOto
what3322WPwhat
some3323DTsome
people3324NNSpeople
will3325MDwill
say3326VVsay
about3327INabout
this3328DTthis
Court3329NPCourt
if3330INif
we3331PPwe
rule3332VVPrule
in3333INin
your3334PP$your
favor3335NNfavor
?3336SENT?
And3337CCand
what3338WPwhat
they3339PPthey
will3340MDwill
say3341VVsay
is3342VBZbe
that3343IN/thatthat
whether3344INwhether
Title3345NPTitle
VII3346NPVII
should3347MDshould
prohibit3348VVprohibit
discrimination3349NNdiscrimination
on3350INon
the3351DTthe
basis3352NNbasis
of3353INof
sexual3354JJsexual
orientation3355NNorientation
is3356VBZbe
a3357DTa
big3358JJbig
policy3359NNpolicy
issue3360NNissue
,3361,,
and3362CCand
it3363PPit
is3364VBZbe
a3365DTa
different3366JJdifferent
policy3367NNpolicy
issue3368NNissue
from3369INfrom
the3370DTthe
one3371CDone
that3372IN/thatthat
Congress3373NPCongress
thought3374VVDthink
it3375PPit
was3376VBDbe
addressing3377VVGaddress
243378CD@card@
in3379INin
19643380CD@card@
.3381SENT.
And3382CCand
Congress3383NPCongress
has3384VHZhave
been3385VBNbe
asked3386VVNask
repeatedly3387RBrepeatedly
in3388INin
the3389DTthe
years3390NNSyear
since3391INsince
19643392CD@card@
to3393TOto
address3394VVaddress
this3395DTthis
question3396NNquestion
.3397SENT.
The3398DTthe
Equality3399NNequality
Act3400NNact
is3401VBZbe
before3402INbefore
Congress3403NPCongress
right3404RBright
now3405RBnow
.3406SENT.
Congress3407NPCongress
has3408VHZhave
declined3409VVNdecline
or3410CCor
failed3411VVNfail
to3412TOto
act3413VVact
on3414INon
these3415DTthese
requests3416NNSrequest
.3417SENT.
And3418CCand
if3419INif
the3420DTthe
Court3421NPCourt
takes3422VVZtake
this3423DTthis
up3424RBup
and3425CCand
interprets3426VVZinterpret
this3427DTthis
19643428CD@card@
statute3429NNstatute
to3430TOto
prohibit3431VVprohibit
discrimination3432NNdiscrimination
based3433VVNbase
on3434INon
sexual3435JJsexual
orientation3436NNorientation
,3437,,
we3438PPwe
will3439MDwill
be3440VBbe
acting3441VVGact
exactly3442RBexactly
like3443INlike
a3444DTa
legislature3445NNlegislature
.3446SENT.
We3447PPwe
might3448MDmight
as3449RBas
well3450RBwell
just3451RBjust
take3452VVtake
the3453DTthe
Equality3454NNequality
Act3455NNact
and3456CCand
issue3457NNissue
that3458IN/thatthat
as3459INas
our3460PP$our
opinion3461NNopinion
and3462CCand
say3463VVsay
,3464,,
as3465INas
Judge3466NPJudge
Posner3467NPPosner
said3468VVDsay
,3469,,
that3470IN/thatthat
the3471DTthe
courts3472NNScourt
need3473VVPneed
to3474TOto
intervene3475VVintervene
on3476INon
questions3477NNSquestion
like3478VVPlike
this3479DTthis
when3480WRBwhen
the3481DTthe
legislative3482JJlegislative
branch3483NNbranch
simply3484RBsimply
will3485MDwill
not3486RBnot
do3487VVdo
so3488RBso
.3489SENT.
What3490WPWhat
would3491MDwould
we3492PPwe
...3493:...
how3494WRBhow
would3495MDwould
we3496PPwe
respond3497VVrespond
to3498TOto
that3499DTthat
question3500NNquestion
?3501SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]3502LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Well3503UHWell
,3504,,
the3505DTthe
fact3506NNfact
that3507IN/thatthat
a3508DTa
loose3509JJloose
cannon3510NNcannon
like3511INlike
Judge3512NPJudge
Posner3513NPPosner
says3514VVZsay
,3515,,
"3516``"
do3517VVPdo
whatever3518WDTwhatever
you3519PPyou
feel3520VVPfeel
like3521INlike
"3522``"
is3523VBZbe
not3524RBnot
what3525WPwhat
we3526PPwe
're3527VBPbe
asking3528VVGask
for3529INfor
.3530SENT.
We3531PPwe
're3532VBPbe
saying3533VVGsay
,3534,,
if3535INif
you3536PPyou
read3537VVPread
the3538DTthe
words3539NNSword
"3540''"
because3541INbecause
of3542INof
sex3543NNsex
"3544''"
and3545CCand
you3546PPyou
ask3547VVPask
,3548,,
in3549INin
19643550CD@card@
,3551,,
what3552WPwhat
did3553VVDdo
those3554DTthose
words3555NNSword
mean3556VVPmean
?3557SENT?
They3558PPthey
meant3559VVDmean
treating3560VVGtreat
men3561NNSman
differently3562RBdifferently
from3563INfrom
women3564NNSwoman
.3565SENT.
So3566RBso
if3567INif
in3568INin
19643569CD@card@
it3570PPit
would3571MDwould
be3572VBbe
discrimination3573NNdiscrimination
to3574TOto
fire3575VVfire
a3576DTa
woman3577NNwoman
who3578WPwho
wanted3579VVDwant
to3580TOto
...3581:...
you3582PPyou
know3583VVPknow
,3584,,
a3585DTa
woman3586NNwoman
who3587WPwho
enjoyed3588VVDenjoy
sewing3589NNsewing
,3590,,
and3591CCand
there3592EXthere
's3593VBZbe
a3594DTa
famous3595JJfamous
case3596NNcase
,3597,,
it3598PPit
's3599VBZbe
the3600DTthe
foundational3601JJfoundational
case3602NNcase
on3603INon
sexual3604JJsexual
orientation3605NNorientation
where3606WRBwhere
they3607PPthey
fired3608VVDfire
a3609DTa
man3610NNman
who3611WPwho
said3612VVDsay
...3613:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]3614LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
We3615PPwe
will3616MDwill
...3617:...
[MS. KARLAN]3618LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...3619:...
his3620PP$his
body3621NNbody
was3622VBDbe
...3623:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]3624LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
We3625PPwe
would3626MDwould
not3627RBnot
be3628VBbe
deciding3629VVGdecide
a3630DTa
major3631JJmajor
policy3632NNpolicy
question3633NNquestion
that3634WDTthat
was3635VBDbe
not3636RBnot
in3637INin
Congress3638NPCongress
's3639POS's
mind3640NNmind
in3641INin
19643642CD@card@
,3643,,
and3644CCand
then3645RBthen
Congress3646NPCongress
has3647VHZhave
repeatedly3648RBrepeatedly
failed3649VVNfail
to3650TOto
address3651VVaddress
in3652INin
the3653DTthe
years3654NNSyear
since3655INsince
then3656RBthen
?3657SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]3658LOC[MS. KARLAN]
No3659RBno
more3660JJRmore
than3661INthan
what3662WPwhat
you3663PPyou
did3664VVDdo
in3665INin
Oncale3666NPOncale
.3667SENT.
No3668DTno
more3669JJRmore
than3670INthan
what3671WPwhat
you3672PPyou
did3673VVDdo
in3674INin
Price3675NPPrice
Waterhouse3676NPWaterhouse
.3677SENT.
No3678DTno
more3679JJRmore
than3680INthan
what3681WPwhat
you3682PPyou
did3683VVDdo
in3684RPin
...3685:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3686LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
All3687DTall
right3688NNright
.3689SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]3690LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...3691:...
Newport3692NPNewport
News3693NPNews
.3694SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]3695LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Is3696VBZbe
there3697RBthere
...3698:...
is3699VBZbe
there3700RBthere
...3701:...
in3702INin
my3703PP$my
mind3704NNmind
,3705,,
there3706EXthere
are3707VBPbe
three3708CDthree
basic3709JJbasic
parts3710NNSpart
to3711TOto
this3712DTthis
case3713NNcase
on3714INon
the3715DTthe
other3716JJother
side3717NNside
,3718,,
to3719TOto
language3720NNlanguage
.3721SENT.
You3722PPyou
've3723VHPhave
dealt3724VVNdeal
with3725INwith
that3726DTthat
.3727SENT.
The3728DTthe
parade3729NNparade
of3730INof
horribles3731NNShorrible
,3732,,
you3733PPyou
've3734VHPhave
dealt3735VVNdeal
with3736INwith
that3737DTthat
.3738SENT.
And3739CCand
the3740DTthe
third3741JJthird
one3742CDone
is3743VBZbe
the3744DTthe
one3745CDone
that3746IN/thatthat
Alito3747NPAlito
is3748VBZbe
bringing3749VVGbring
up3750RPup
in3751INin
one3752CDone
form3753NNform
,3754,,
as3755INas
it3756PPit
comes3757VVZcome
out3758RPout
of3759INof
the3760DTthe
...3761:...
out3762RBout
of3763INof
the3764DTthe
briefs3765NNSbrief
,3766,,
as3767INas
I3768PPI
read3769VVPread
it3770PPit
in3771INin
your3772PP$your
opponent3773NNopponent
's3774POS's
brief3775NNbrief
.3776SENT.
I3777PPI
would3778MDwould
put3779VVput
it3780PPit
in3781INin
these3782DTthese
terms3783NNSterm
.3784SENT.
Imagine3785VVimagine
a3786DTa
statute3787NNstatute
that3788WDTthat
says3789VVZsay
policemen3790NNSpoliceman
,3791,,
dah3792NNdah
,3793,,
dah3794NNdah
,3795,,
dah3796NNdah
,3797,,
must3798MDmust
pay3799VVpay
damages3800NNSdamage
.3801SENT.
Passed3802VVNpass
a3803DTa
long3804JJlong
time3805NNtime
ago3806RBago
.3807SENT.
That3808DTthat
does3809VVZdo
n't3810RBn't
apply3811VVapply
to3812TOto
German3813JJGerman
policemen3814NNSpoliceman
.3815SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]3816LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Does3817VVZdo
n't3818RBn't
apply3819VVapply
to3820TOto
what3821WPwhat
kind3822NNkind
of3823INof
...3824:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3825LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
To3826TOTo
German3827JJGerman
policemen3828NNSpoliceman
.3829SENT.
The3830DTthe
meaning3831NNmeaning
is3832VBZbe
the3833DTthe
same3834JJsame
.3835SENT.
German3836JJGerman
policemen3837NNSpoliceman
are3838VBPbe
policemen3839NNSpoliceman
.3840SENT.
But3841CCbut
the3842DTthe
statute3843NNstatute
does3844VVZdo
n't3845RBn't
apply3846VVapply
to3847TOto
them3848PPthem
.3849SENT.
How3850WRBHow
do3851VVPdo
we3852PPwe
know3853VVPknow
?3854SENT?
Well3855UHwell
,3856,,
we3857PPwe
know3858VVPknow
through3859INthrough
a3860DTa
lot3861NNlot
of3862INof
history3863NNhistory
,3864,,
dah3865NNdah
,3866,,
dah3867NNdah
,3868,,
dah3869NNdah
.3870SENT.
Okay3871JJokay
?3872SENT?
Now3873RBnow
,3874,,
that3875WDTthat
's3876VBZbe
the3877DTthe
...3878:...
that3879WDTthat
's3880VBZbe
the3881DTthe
box3882NNbox
in3883INin
which3884WDTwhich
I3885PPI
put3886VVDput
the3887DTthe
argument3888NNargument
that3889IN/thatthat
Justice3890NPJustice
Alito3891NPAlito
made3892VVDmake
.3893SENT.
It3894PPit
's3895VBZbe
a3896DTa
serious3897JJserious
legal3898JJlegal
argument3899NNargument
,3900,,
and3901CCand
the3902DTthe
argument3903NNargument
is3904VBZbe
that3905IN/thatthat
at3906INat
the3907DTthe
time3908NNtime
Congress3909NPCongress
would3910MDwould
n't3911RBn't
have3912VHhave
dreamt3913VVNdream
of3914INof
this3915DTthis
.3916SENT.
And3917CCand
,3918,,
therefore3919RBtherefore
,3920,,
the3921DTthe
words3922NNSword
,3923,,
though3924INthough
they3925PPthey
apply3926VVPapply
,3927,,
they3928PPthey
meant3929VVDmean
to3930TOto
exclude3931VVexclude
the3932DTthe
gays3933NNSgay
and3934CCand
transgender3935NNtransgender
.3936SENT.
Now3937RBnow
,3938,,
what3939WPwhat
I3940PPI
need3941VVPneed
to3942TOto
hear3943VVhear
is3944VBZbe
a3945DTa
clear3946JJclear
answer3947NNanswer
to3948TOto
that3949DTthat
question3950NNquestion
.3951SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]3952LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I3953PPI
think3954VVPthink
the3955DTthe
way3956NNway
to3957TOto
think3958VVthink
about3959INabout
this3960DTthis
is3961VBZbe
to3962TOto
ask3963VVask
about3964INabout
the3965DTthe
specific3966JJspecific
behavior3967NNbehavior
that3968WDTthat
's3969VBZbe
at3970INat
issue3971NNissue
,3972,,
which3973WDTwhich
is3974VBZbe
a3975DTa
man3976NNman
dates3977VVZdate
a3978DTa
man3979NNman
,3980,,
and3981CCand
then3982RBthen
ask3983VVask
:3984::
How3985WRBHow
does3986VVZdo
that3987DTthat
fit3988NNfit
within3989INwithin
the3990DTthe
language3991NNlanguage
?3992SENT?
And3993CCand
the3994DTthe
best3995JJSgood
example3996NNexample
I3997PPI
can3998MDcan
give3999VVgive
...4000:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4001LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
It4002PPit
fits4003VVZfit
.4004SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]4005LOC[MS. KARLAN]
No4006NPNo
,4007,,
I'm4008NPI'm
...4009:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4010LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I4011PPI
give4012VVPgive
you4013PPyou
it4014PPit
fits4015VVZfit
.4016SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]4017LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I'm4018NPI'm
...4019:...
I4020PPI
'm4021VBPbe
about4022RBabout
to4023TOto
explain4024VVexplain
why4025NNwhy
...4026:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4027LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah4028NPYeah
.4029SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]4030LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...4031:...
it4032PPit
fits4033VVZfit
.4034SENT.
Which4035WDTwhich
is4036VBZbe
the4037DTthe
idea4038NNidea
was4039VBDbe
that4040IN/thatthat
people4041NNSpeople
should4042MDshould
not4043RBnot
be4044VBbe
denied4045VVNdeny
jobs4046NNSjob
that4047IN/thatthat
they4048PPthey
're4049VBPbe
qualified4050VVNqualify
to4051TOto
do4052VVdo
,4053,,
award-winning4054JJaward-winning
advocates4055NNSadvocate
for4056INfor
child4057NNchild
services4058NNSservice
like4059INlike
Gerald4060NPGerald
Bostock4061NPBostock
should4062MDshould
not4063RBnot
be4064VBbe
denied4065VVNdeny
a4066DTa
job4067NNjob
,4068,,
because4069INbecause
they4070PPthey
are4071VBPbe
a4072DTa
man4073NNman
who4074WPwho
does4075VVZdo
something4076NNsomething
that4077IN/thatthat
if4078INif
they4079PPthey
were4080VBDbe
a4081DTa
woman4082NNwoman
,4083,,
would4084MDwould
cause4085VVcause
no4086DTno
problems4087NNSproblem
at4088INat
all4089DTall
.4090SENT.
So4091RBso
just4092RBjust
to4093TOto
give4094VVgive
an4095DTan
example4096NNexample
from4097INfrom
the4098DTthe
first4099JJfirst
sex4100NNsex
discrimination4101NNdiscrimination
case4102NNcase
this4103DTthis
Court4104NPCourt
had4105VHDhave
,4106,,
which4107WDTwhich
was4108VBDbe
the4109DTthe
Phillips4110NPPhillips
against4111INagainst
Martin4112NPMartin
Marietta4113NPMarietta
case4114NNcase
,4115,,
a4116DTa
woman4117NNwoman
who4118WPwho
has4119VHZhave
children4120NNSchild
at4121INat
home4122NNhome
should4123MDshould
not4124RBnot
be4125VBbe
denied4126VVNdeny
a4127DTa
job4128NNjob
that4129IN/thatthat
a4130DTa
man4131NNman
who4132WPwho
has4133VHZhave
children4134NNSchild
at4135INat
home4136NNhome
.4137SENT.
Now4138RBnow
,4139,,
all4140RBall
you4141PPyou
have4142VHPhave
to4143TOto
do4144VVdo
is4145VBZbe
say4146VVsay
those4147DTthose
words4148NNSword
apply4149VVPapply
also4150RBalso
if4151INif
it4152PPit
is4153VBZbe
a4154DTa
woman4155NNwoman
who4156WPwho
has4157VHZhave
a4158DTa
wife4159NNwife
at4160INat
home4161NNhome
...4162:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4163LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Counsel4164NPCounsel
,4165,,
I4166PPI
...4167:...
[MS. KARLAN]4168LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...4169:...
rather4170RBrather
than4171INthan
children4172NNSchild
.4173SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4174LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Several4175JJseveral
,4176,,
I4177PPI
think4178VVPthink
about4179INabout
234180CD@card@
,4181,,
states4182NNSstate
have4183VHPhave
been4184VBNbe
passing4185VVGpass
laws4186NNSlaw
to4187TOto
address4188VVaddress
these4189DTthese
...4190:...
these4191DTthese
issues4192NNSissue
.4193SENT.
And4194CCand
I4195PPI
do4196VVPdo
n't4197RBn't
know4198VVknow
how4199WRBhow
many4200JJmany
of4201INof
them4202PPthem
,4203,,
but4204CCbut
I4205PPI
think4206VVPthink
it4207PPit
's4208VBZbe
a4209DTa
big4210JJbig
part4211NNpart
of4212INof
them4213PPthem
,4214,,
when4215WRBwhen
they4216PPthey
do4217VVPdo
extend4218VVextend
the4219DTthe
coverage4220NNcoverage
against4221INagainst
discrimination4222NNdiscrimination
on4223INon
the4224DTthe
basis4225NNbasis
of4226INof
sex4227NNsex
to4228TOto
sexual4229JJsexual
orientation4230NNorientation
,4231,,
transgender4232NNtransgender
,4233,,
they4234PPthey
also4235RBalso
include4236VVPinclude
an4237DTan
exemption4238NNexemption
for4239INfor
religious4240JJreligious
organizations4241NNSorganization
.4242SENT.
Now4243RBnow
,4244,,
if4245INif
we4246PPwe
're4247VBPbe
going4248VVGgo
to4249TOto
be4250VBbe
extending4251VVGextend
the4252DTthe
...4253:...
the4254DTthe
understanding4255NNunderstanding
of4256INof
what4257WPwhat
sex4258NNsex
encompasses4259VVZencompass
,4260,,
and4261CCand
I4262PPI
know4263VVPknow
your4264PP$your
argument4265NNargument
...4266:...
[MS. KARLAN]4267LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yeah4268NPYeah
.4269SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4270LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
...4271:...
that4272IN/thatthat
that4273DTthat
's4274VBZbe
not4275RBnot
doing4276VVGdo
that4277IN/thatthat
,4278,,
how4279WRBhow
do4280VVPdo
we4281PPwe
address4282VVaddress
that4283DTthat
other4284JJother
concern4285NNconcern
,4286,,
that4287WDTthat
at4288INat
least4289JJSleast
,4290,,
I4291PPI
think4292VVPthink
almost4293RBalmost
every4294DTevery
state4295NNstate
legislature4296NNlegislature
that4297WDTthat
has4298VHZhave
extended4299VVNextend
it4300PPit
has4301VHZhave
felt4302VVNfeel
compelled4303VVNcompel
to4304TOto
address4305VVaddress
?4306SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]4307LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Well4308UHWell
,4309,,
I4310PPI
...4311:...
I4312PPI
...4313:...
I4314PPI
would4315MDwould
say4316VVsay
three4317CDthree
things4318NNSthing
about4319INabout
that4320DTthat
:4321::
The4322DTthe
first4323JJfirst
is4324VBZbe
this4325DTthis
Court4326NPCourt
has4327VHZhave
already4328RBalready
created4329VVNcreate
an4330DTan
exemption4331NNexemption
for4332INfor
sincere4333JJsincere
religious4334JJreligious
belief4335NNbelief
for4336INfor
a4337DTa
large4338JJlarge
category4339NNcategory
of4340INof
employers4341NNSemployer
through4342INthrough
the4343DTthe
ministerial4344JJministerial
exception4345NNexception
.4346SENT.
The4347DTthe
second4348NNsecond
is4349VBZbe
that4350IN/thatthat
Congress4351NPCongress
balanced4352VVDbalance
these4353DTthese
issues4354NNSissue
and4355CCand
has4356VHZhave
rebalanced4357VVNrebalance
them4358PPthem
several4359JJseveral
times4360NNStime
in4361INin
the4362DTthe
co-religionist4363NNco-religionist
exception4364NNexception
.4365SENT.
The4366DTthe
third4367JJthird
thing4368NNthing
I4369PPI
would4370MDwould
say4371VVsay
is4372VBZbe
to4373TOto
understand4374VVunderstand
this4375DTthis
in4376INin
context4377NNcontext
,4378,,
which4379WDTwhich
is4380VBZbe
854381CD@card@
percent4382NNpercent
of4383INof
American4384JJAmerican
employers4385NNSemployer
are4386VBPbe
not4387RBnot
covered4388VVNcover
by4389INby
Title4390NPTitle
VII4391NPVII
at4392INat
all4393DTall
.4394SENT.
So4395RBso
as4396RBas
to4397TOto
those4398DTthose
employers4399NNSemployer
,4400,,
if4401INif
they4402PPthey
have4403VHPhave
religious4404JJreligious
objections4405NNSobjection
to4406TOto
hiring4407VVGhire
someone4408NNsomeone
who4409WPwho
is4410VBZbe
gay4411JJgay
,4412,,
they4413PPthey
're4414VBPbe
free4415JJfree
to4416TOto
continue4417VVcontinue
doing4418VVGdo
that4419DTthat
.4420SENT.
And4421CCand
the4422DTthe
fourth4423JJfourth
is4424VBZbe
to4425TOto
make4426VVmake
it4427PPit
very4428RBvery
clear4429JJclear
that4430IN/thatthat
the4431DTthe
question4432NNquestion
is4433VBZbe
not4434RBnot
whether4435INwhether
people4436NNSpeople
have4437VHPhave
religious4438JJreligious
objections4439NNSobjection
to4440TOto
homosexuality4441NNhomosexuality
;4442:;
it4443PPit
's4444VBZbe
whether4445INwhether
they4446PPthey
have4447VHPhave
religious4448JJreligious
objections4449NNSobjection
to4450TOto
hiring4451VVGhire
someone4452NNsomeone
who4453WPwho
is4454VBZbe
gay4455JJgay
or4456CCor
lesbian4457JJlesbian
.4458SENT.
And4459CCand
there4460EXthere
are4461VBPbe
many4462JJmany
employers4463NNSemployer
whose4464WP$whose
own4465JJown
religious4466JJreligious
beliefs4467NNSbelief
would4468MDwould
tell4469VVtell
them4470PPthem
this4471DTthis
would4472MDwould
be4473VBbe
immoral4474JJimmoral
for4475INfor
them4476PPthem
,4477,,
who4478WPwho
have4479VHPhave
no4480DTno
problem4481NNproblem
hiring4482VVGhire
gays4483NNSgay
and4484CCand
lesbians4485NNSlesbian
who4486WPwho
are4487VBPbe
qualified4488VVNqualify
to4489TOto
do4490VVdo
a4491DTa
job4492NNjob
.4493SENT.
If4494INif
I4495PPI
could4496MDcould
just4497RBjust
ask4498VVask
the4499DTthe
Court4500NPCourt
to4501TOto
do4502VVdo
one4503CDone
thing4504NNthing
in4505INin
thinking4506VVGthink
back4507RBback
to4508TOto
19644509CD@card@
,4510,,
it4511PPit
is4512VBZbe
to4513TOto
look4514VVlook
at4515INat
the4516DTthe
two4517CDtwo
foundational4518JJfoundational
opinions4519NNSopinion
on4520INon
which4521WDTwhich
everybody4522NNeverybody
has4523VHZhave
played4524VVNplay
a4525DTa
game4526NNgame
of4527INof
telephone4528NNtelephone
ever4529RBever
since4530RBsince
.4531SENT.
It4532PPit
's4533VBZbe
like4534INlike
your4535PP$your
opinion4536NNopinion
last4537JJlast
term4538NNterm
in4539INin
Argus4540NPArgus
Media4541NPMedia
,4542,,
where4543WRBwhere
you4544PPyou
ask4545VVPask
where4546WRBwhere
did4547VVDdo
the4548DTthe
idea4549NNidea
that4550IN/thatthat
homosexuality4551NNhomosexuality
was4552VBDbe
n't4553RBn't
covered4554VVNcover
come4555VVNcome
from4556INfrom
?4557SENT?
It4558PPit
came4559VVDcome
from4560INfrom
first4561RBfirst
a4562DTa
case4563NNcase
where4564WRBwhere
a4565DTa
gay4566JJgay
black4567JJblack
man4568NNman
said4569VVDsay
he4570PPhe
was4571VBDbe
being4572VBGbe
treated4573VVNtreat
worse4574JJRbad
than4575INthan
gay4576JJgay
white4577JJwhite
men4578NNSman
.4579SENT.
It4580PPit
was4581VBDbe
n't4582RBn't
even4583RBeven
a4584DTa
sexual4585JJsexual
discrimination4586NNdiscrimination
case4587NNcase
.4588SENT.
The4589DTthe
second4590JJsecond
one4591CDone
came4592VVDcome
from4593INfrom
a4594DTa
straight4595JJstraight
man4596NNman
who4597WPwho
was4598VBDbe
fired4599VVNfire
because4600INbecause
...4601:...
who4602WPwho
was4603VBDbe
denied4604VVNdeny
a4605DTa
job4606NNjob
because4607INbecause
he4608PPhe
said4609VVDsay
his4610PP$his
hobby4611NNhobby
was4612VBDbe
sewing4613VVGsew
.4614SENT.
And4615CCand
the4616DTthe
employer4617NNemployer
said4618VVDsay
:4619::
That4620WDTthat
's4621VBZbe
an4622DTan
effeminate4623JJeffeminate
hobby4624NNhobby
,4625,,
so4626RBso
I4627PPI
bet4628VVPbet
you4629PPyou
're4630VBPbe
gay4631JJgay
.4632SENT.
If4633INif
you4634PPyou
look4635VVPlook
at4636INat
the4637DTthe
reasoning4638NNreasoning
in4639INin
those4640DTthose
cases4641NNScase
,4642,,
you4643PPyou
will4644MDwill
realize4645VVrealize
that4646IN/thatthat
it4647PPit
was4648VBDbe
not4649RBnot
until4650INuntil
Hively4651NPHively
that4652IN/thatthat
any4653DTany
court4654NNcourt
did4655VVDdo
a4656DTa
careful4657JJcareful
reading4658NNreading
of4659INof
the4660DTthe
statute4661NNstatute
using4662VVGuse
contemporaneous4663JJcontemporaneous
methods4664NNSmethod
of4665INof
textual4666JJtextual
interpretation4667NNinterpretation
...4668:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]4669LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But4670CCbut
you4671PPyou
gave4672VVDgive
your4673PP$your
...4674:...
[MS. KARLAN]4675LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...4676:...
and4677CCand
since4678INsince
then4679RBthen
a4680DTa
majority4681NNmajority
of4682INof
justices4683NNSjustice
...4684:...
I4685PPI
mean4686VVPmean
a4687DTa
majority4688NNmajority
of4689INof
judges4690NNSjudge
have4691VHPhave
held4692VVNhold
that4693IN/thatthat
sexual4694JJsexual
orientation4695NNorientation
is4696VBZbe
a4697DTa
subset4698NNsubset
of4699INof
sex4700NNsex
discrimination4701NNdiscrimination
.4702SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]4703LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Justice4704NPJustice
Breyer4705NPBreyer
characterized4706VVNcharacterize
what4707WPwhat
I4708PPI
said4709VVDsay
earlier4710RBRearlier
as4711INas
conceding4712VVGconcede
that4713DTthat
sexual4714JJsexual
orientation4715NNorientation
discrimination4716NNdiscrimination
fits4717VVZfit
the4718DTthe
words4719NNSword
of4720INof
Title4721NPTitle
VII4722NPVII
,4723,,
but4724CCbut
that4725IN/thatthat
we4726PPwe
should4727MDshould
take4728VVtake
a4729DTa
broader4730JJRbroad
view4731NNview
of4732INof
what4733WPwhat
Congress4734NPCongress
had4735VHDhave
in4736INin
mind4737NNmind
.4738SENT.
But4739CCbut
that4740DTthat
was4741VBDbe
not4742RBnot
...4743:...
that4744WDTthat
was4745VBDbe
not4746RBnot
the4747DTthe
premise4748NNpremise
of4749INof
my4750PP$my
argument4751NNargument
.4752SENT.
And4753CCand
your4754PP$your
core4755NNcore
...4756:...
the4757DTthe
...4758:...
the4759DTthe
parties4760NNSparty
have4761VHPhave
in4762INin
their4763PP$their
briefs4764NNSbrief
,4765,,
have4766VHPhave
all4767DTall
of4768INof
these4769DTthese
comparisons4770NNScomparison
,4771,,
and4772CCand
they4773PPthey
will4774MDwill
make4775VVmake
your4776PP$your
head4777NNhead
spin4778NNspin
if4779INif
you4780PPyou
...4781:...
if4782INif
you4783PPyou
try4784VVPtry
to4785TOto
figure4786VVfigure
them4787PPthem
all4788DTall
out4789RPout
.4790SENT.
24791LS2
But4792CCbut
let4793VVlet
me4794PPme
just4795RBjust
go4796VVPgo
to4797TOto
your4798PP$your
core4799NNcore
one4800CDone
,4801,,
which4802WDTwhich
you4803PPyou
began4804VVDbegin
with4805INwith
today4806NNtoday
.4807SENT.
A4808DTa
man4809NNman
is4810VBZbe
attracted4811VVNattract
to4812TOto
other4813JJother
men4814NNSman
.4815SENT.
He4816PPhe
's4817VBZbe
fired4818VVNfire
,4819,,
let4820VVlet
's4821VBZbe
say4822VVsay
.4823SENT.
A4824DTa
woman4825NNwoman
is4826VBZbe
attracted4827VVNattract
to4828TOto
men4829NNSman
;4830:;
she4831PPshe
is4832VBZbe
not4833RBnot
fired4834VVNfire
.4835SENT.
You4836PPyou
say4837VVPsay
that4838DTthat
's4839VBZbe
all4840DTall
you4841PPyou
need4842VVPneed
to4843TOto
look4844VVlook
at4845INat
.4846SENT.
That4847DTthat
's4848VBZbe
discrimination4849NNdiscrimination
on4850INon
the4851DTthe
basis4852NNbasis
of4853INof
sex4854NNsex
,4855,,
right4856RBright
?4857SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]4858LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yes4859NPYes
.4860SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]4861LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Okay4862NPOkay
.4863SENT.
That4864DTthat
's4865VBZbe
not4866RBnot
...4867:...
that4868WDTthat
's4869VBZbe
not4870RBnot
correct4871JJcorrect
,4872,,
because4873INbecause
there4874EXthere
are4875VBPbe
two4876CDtwo
possible4877JJpossible
explanations4878NNSexplanation
for4879INfor
what4880WPwhat
happened4881VVDhappen
there4882RBthere
.4883SENT.
It4884PPit
could4885MDcould
be4886VBbe
based4887VVNbase
on4888INon
sexual4889JJsexual
orientation4890NNorientation
,4891,,
or4892CCor
it4893PPit
could4894MDcould
just4895RBjust
be4896VBbe
based4897VVNbase
on4898INon
the4899DTthe
fact4900NNfact
that4901IN/thatthat
the4902DTthe
employer4903NNemployer
wants4904VVZwant
...4905:...
does4906VVZdo
not4907RBnot
want4908VVwant
to4909TOto
hire4910VVhire
men4911NNSman
.4912SENT.
Now4913RBnow
,4914,,
if4915INif
you4916PPyou
add4917VVPadd
in4918INin
two4919CDtwo
other4920JJother
cases4921NNScase
,4922,,
that4923IN/thatthat
a4924DTa
man4925NNman
who4926WPwho
is4927VBZbe
attracted4928VVNattract
to4929TOto
women4930NNSwoman
,4931,,
not4932RBnot
fired4933VVNfire
,4934,,
a4935DTa
woman4936NNwoman
who4937WPwho
's4938VBZbe
attracted4939VVNattract
to4940TOto
women4941NNSwoman
,4942,,
is4943VBZbe
fired4944VVNfire
,4945,,
then4946RBthen
you4947PPyou
have4948VHPhave
a4949DTa
much4950RBmuch
better4951JJRgood
idea4952NNidea
the4953DTthe
basis4954NNbasis
for4955INfor
the4956DTthe
discrimination4957NNdiscrimination
.4958SENT.
And4959CCand
it4960PPit
's4961VBZbe
sexual4962JJsexual
orientation4963NNorientation
.4964SENT.
It4965PPit
's4966VBZbe
not4967RBnot
sex4968NNsex
.4969SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]4970LOC[MS. KARLAN]
But4971CCbut
in4972INin
a4973DTa
case4974NNcase
like4975INlike
the4976DTthe
two4977CDtwo
cases4978NNScase
before4979INbefore
this4980DTthis
Court4981NPCourt
where4982WRBwhere
the4983DTthe
employer4984NNemployer
had4985VHDhave
hired4986VVNhire
these4987DTthese
men4988NNSman
and4989CCand
they4990PPthey
were4991VBDbe
already4992RBalready
there4993RBthere
,4994,,
the4995DTthe
supposition4996NNsupposition
you4997PPyou
made4998VVDmake
in4999INin
your5000PP$your
question5001NNquestion
does5002VVZdo
n't5003RBn't
apply5004VVapply
,5005,,
which5006WDTwhich
is5007VBZbe
we5008PPwe
know5009VVPknow
this5010DTthis
is5011VBZbe
an5012DTan
employer5013NNemployer
who5014WPwho
's5015VBZbe
willing5016JJwilling
to5017TOto
hire5018VVhire
men5019NNSman
.5020SENT.
Indeed5021RBindeed
,5022,,
the5023DTthe
employer5024NNemployer
in5025INin
Gerald5026NPGerald
...5027:...
I5028PPI
mean5029VVPmean
the5030DTthe
employer5031NNemployer
in5032INin
Don5033NPDon
Zarda5034NPZarda
's5035POS's
case5036NNcase
had5037VHDhave
only5038JJonly
men5039NNSman
as5040INas
skydiving5041VVGskydive
instructors5042NNSinstructor
.5043SENT.
So5044RBso
when5045WRBwhen
he5046PPhe
fires5047VVZfire
a5048DTa
man5049NNman
who5050WPwho
wants5051VVZwant
to5052TOto
date5053VVdate
a5054DTa
woman5055NNwoman
and5056CCand
he5057PPhe
...5058:...
I5059PPI
mean5060VVPmean
a5061DTa
man5062NNman
who5063WPwho
wants5064VVZwant
to5065TOto
date5066VVdate
a5067DTa
man5068NNman
and5069CCand
he5070PPhe
does5071VVZdo
not5072RBnot
fire5073VVfire
a5074DTa
woman5075NNwoman
who5076WPwho
wants5077VVZwant
to5078TOto
date5079VVdate
a5080DTa
man5081NNman
...5082:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]5083LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
The5084NPThe
...5085:...
the5086DTthe
point5087NNpoint
is5088VBZbe
that5089DTthat
discrimination5090NNdiscrimination
on5091INon
the5092DTthe
basis5093NNbasis
of5094INof
sex5095NNsex
in5096INin
the5097DTthe
sense5098NNsense
that5099IN/thatthat
Congress5100NPCongress
understood5101VVDunderstand
it5102PPit
in5103INin
19645104CD@card@
is5105VBZbe
a5106DTa
different5107JJdifferent
concept5108NNconcept
from5109INfrom
discrimination5110NNdiscrimination
on5111INon
the5112DTthe
basis5113NNbasis
of5114INof
...5115:...
[MS. KARLAN]5116LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Well5117UHWell
,5118,,
in5119RBin
...5120:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]5121LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
...5122:...
sexual5123JJsexual
orientation5124NNorientation
.5125SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]5126LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...5127:...
in5128INin
...5129:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]5130LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
And5131CCand
that5132DTthat
's5133VBZbe
what5134WPwhat
you5135PPyou
're5136VBPbe
fighting5137VVGfight
.5138SENT.
You5139PPyou
're5140VBPbe
trying5141VVGtry
to5142TOto
change5143VVchange
the5144DTthe
meaning5145NNmeaning
of5146INof
what5147WPwhat
Congress5148NPCongress
understood5149VVDunderstand
sex5150NNsex
to5151TOto
mean5152VVmean
and5153CCand
what5154WPwhat
everybody5155NNeverybody
understood5156VVDunderstand
...5157:...
[MS. KARLAN]5158LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I5159PPI
...5160:...
I'm5161NNI'm
...5162:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]5163LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
...5164:...
sex5165NNsex
to5166TOto
mean5167VVmean
in5168INin
19645169CD@card@
.5170SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]5171LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...5172:...
not5173RBnot
trying5174VVGtry
to5175TOto
change5176VVchange
that5177IN/thatthat
at5178INat
all5179DTall
.5180SENT.
I5181PPI
'm5182VBPbe
simply5183RBsimply
saying5184VVGsay
that5185IN/thatthat
if5186INif
a5187DTa
man5188NNman
and5189CCand
a5190DTa
woman5191NNwoman
both5192CCboth
wanted5193VVDwant
to5194TOto
sew5195VVsew
and5196CCand
you5197PPyou
fire5198VVfire
the5199DTthe
man5200NNman
who5201WPwho
loves5202VVZlove
sewing5203NNsewing
and5204CCand
you5205PPyou
do5206VVPdo
n't5207RBn't
fire5208VVfire
the5209DTthe
woman5210NNwoman
who5211WPwho
loves5212VVZlove
sewing5213NNsewing
,5214,,
that5215WDTthat
's5216VBZbe
discrimination5217NNdiscrimination
pure5218JJpure
and5219CCand
simple5220JJsimple
,5221,,
sex5222NNsex
discrimination5223NNdiscrimination
.5224SENT.
If5225INif
you5226PPyou
fire5227VVfire
a5228DTa
...5229:...
if5230INif
you5231PPyou
fire5232VVfire
the5233DTthe
man5234NNman
who5235WPwho
...5236:...
thank5237VVthank
you5238PPyou
.5239SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5240LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank5241VVthank
you5242PPyou
,5243,,
counsel5244NNcounsel
.5245SENT.
Counsel5246NNcounsel
.5247SENT.
[5248SYM[
LAUGHTER5249NNlaughter
]5250SYM]
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5251LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Sorry5252RBsorry
.5253SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]5254LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Mr5255NPMr
.5256SENT.
Chief5257NPChief
Justice5258NPJustice
,5259,,
and5260CCand
may5261MDmay
it5262PPit
please5263VVplease
the5264DTthe
Court5265NNcourt
:5266::
[5267SYM[
LAUGHTER5268NNlaughter
]5269SYM]
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5270LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Touché5271NPTouché
.5272SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]5273LOC[MR. HARRIS]
In5274INin
...5275:...
in5276INin
19825277CD@card@
,5278,,
Wisconsin5279NPWisconsin
became5280VVDbecome
the5281DTthe
first5282JJfirst
state5283NNstate
in5284INin
the5285DTthe
country5286NNcountry
to5287TOto
pass5288VVpass
a5289DTa
law5290NNlaw
banning5291VVGban
discrimination5292NNdiscrimination
because5293INbecause
of5294INof
sexual5295JJsexual
orientation5296NNorientation
in5297INin
private5298JJprivate
employment5299NNemployment
.5300SENT.
The5301DTthe
proponents5302NNSproponent
of5303INof
that5304DTthat
law5305NNlaw
celebrated5306VVDcelebrate
its5307PP$its
passage5308NNpassage
as5309INas
a5310DTa
landmark5311JJlandmark
achievement5312NNachievement
for5313INfor
gay5314JJgay
rights5315NNSright
.5316SENT.
According5317VVGaccord
to5318TOto
the5319DTthe
plaintiffs5320NNSplaintiff
here5321RBhere
,5322,,
however5323RBhowever
,5324,,
Wisconsin5325NPWisconsin
's5326POS's
landmark5327JJlandmark
law5328NNlaw
actually5329RBactually
had5330VHDhave
little5331JJlittle
,5332,,
if5333INif
any5334DTany
,5335,,
practical5336JJpractical
impact5337NNimpact
because5338INbecause
Congress5339NPCongress
had5340VHDhave
already5341RBalready
banned5342VVNban
sexual5343JJsexual
orientation5344NNorientation
discrimination5345NNdiscrimination
nationwide5346JJnationwide
,5347,,
185348CD@card@
years5349NNSyear
earlier5350RBRearlier
in5351INin
the5352DTthe
Civil5353NPCivil
Rights5354NPSRights
Act5355NPAct
of5356INof
19645357CD@card@
.5358SENT.
To5359TOTo
quote5360VVquote
Judge5361NPJudge
Lynch5362NPLynch
's5363POS's
dissent5364NNdissent
below5365RBbelow
,5366,,
Congress5367NPCongress
did5368VVDdo
no5369DTno
such5370JJsuch
thing5371NNthing
.5372SENT.
Sex5373NNsex
and5374CCand
sexual5375JJsexual
orientation5376NNorientation
are5377VBPbe
independent5378JJindependent
and5379CCand
distinct5380JJdistinct
characteristics5381NNScharacteristic
,5382,,
and5383CCand
sexual5384JJsexual
orientation5385NNorientation
discrimination5386NNdiscrimination
by5387INby
itself5388PPitself
does5389VVZdo
not5390RBnot
constitute5391VVconstitute
discrimination5392NNdiscrimination
because5393INbecause
of5394INof
sex5395NNsex
under5396INunder
Title5397NPTitle
VII5398NPVII
.5399SENT.
That5400DTthat
's5401VBZbe
just5402RBjust
as5403INas
true5404JJtrue
today5405NNtoday
as5406INas
it5407PPit
was5408VBDbe
in5409INin
115410CD@card@
19645411CD@card@
.5412SENT.
The5413DTthe
core5414JJcore
error5415NNerror
in5416INin
the5417DTthe
Second5418NPSecond
Circu5419NPCircu
it5420PPit
's5421VBZbe
holding5422VVGhold
is5423VBZbe
actually5424RBactually
quite5425RBquite
similar5426JJsimilar
to5427TOto
the5428DTthe
error5429NNerror
that5430WDTthat
led5431VVDlead
this5432DTthis
Court5433NPCourt
to5434TOto
reverse5435VVreverse
in5436INin
Oncale5437NPOncale
.5438SENT.
In5439INin
Oncale5440NPOncale
,5441,,
the5442DTthe
Fifth5443NPFifth
Circuit5444NPCircuit
had5445VHDhave
held5446VVNhold
that5447IN/thatthat
same-sex5448JJsame-sex
harassment5449NNharassment
claims5450NNSclaim
were5451VBDbe
categorically5452RBcategorically
excluded5453VVNexclude
from5454INfrom
Title5455NPTitle
VII5456NPVII
.5457SENT.
This5458DTthis
Court5459NPCourt
correctly5460RBcorrectly
reversed5461VVDreverse
and5462CCand
held5463VVDhold
that5464IN/thatthat
such5465JJsuch
claims5466NNSclaim
may5467MDmay
well5468RBwell
be5469VBbe
cognizable5470JJcognizable
,5471,,
as5472RBas
long5473RBlong
as5474INas
the5475DTthe
plaintiff5476NNplaintiff
meets5477VVZmeet
all5478DTall
requirements5479NNSrequirement
of5480INof
the5481DTthe
statute5482NNstatute
,5483,,
especially5484RBespecially
what5485WPwhat
this5486DTthis
Court5487NPCourt
called5488VVDcall
the5489DTthe
"5490``"
critical5491JJcritical
inquiry5492NNinquiry
into5493INinto
whether5494INwhether
members5495NNSmember
of5496INof
one5497CDone
sex5498NNsex
were5499VBDbe
being5500VBGbe
treated5501VVNtreat
worse5502JJRbad
than5503INthan
members5504NNSmember
of5505INof
the5506DTthe
other5507JJother
sex5508NNsex
.5509SENT.
"5510''"
This5511DTthis
case5512NNcase
is5513VBZbe
just5514RBjust
the5515DTthe
mirror5516NNmirror
image5517NNimage
of5518INof
Oncale5519NPOncale
.5520SENT.
Whereas5521INwhereas
the5522DTthe
lower5523JJRlow
courts5524NNScourt
in5525INin
Oncale5526NPOncale
adopted5527VVDadopt
a5528DTa
categorical5529JJcategorical
exclusion5530NNexclusion
,5531,,
the5532DTthe
Second5533NPSecond
Circuit5534NPCircuit
adopted5535VVDadopt
a5536DTa
rule5537NNrule
of5538INof
per5539FWper
se5540FWse
inclusion5541NNinclusion
in5542INin
which5543WDTwhich
plaintiffs5544NNSplaintiff
alleging5545VVGallege
sexual5546JJsexual
orientation5547NNorientation
discrimination5548NNdiscrimination
receive5549VVreceive
a5550DTa
free5551JJfree
pass5552NNpass
around5553INaround
the5554DTthe
critical5555JJcritical
inquiry5556NNinquiry
into5557INinto
whether5558INwhether
men5559NNSman
and5560CCand
women5561NNSwoman
are5562VBPbe
being5563VBGbe
treated5564VVNtreat
differently5565RBdifferently
because5566INbecause
of5567INof
their5568PP$their
sex5569NNsex
.5570SENT.
In5571INin
short5572JJshort
,5573,,
the5574DTthe
Second5575NPSecond
Circuit5576NPCircuit
simply5577RBsimply
changed5578VVDchange
the5579DTthe
ultimate5580JJultimate
question5581NNquestion
from5582INfrom
sex5583NNsex
to5584TOto
sexual5585JJsexual
orientation5586NNorientation
.5587SENT.
But5588CCbut
because5589INbecause
both5590DTboth
men5591NNSman
and5592CCand
women5593NNSwoman
may5594MDmay
have5595VHhave
same5596JJsame
sex5597NNsex
attractions5598NNSattraction
or5599CCor
partners5600NNSpartner
,5601,,
a5602DTa
stand-alone5603JJstand-alone
allegation5604NNallegation
of5605INof
sexual5606JJsexual
orientation5607NNorientation
discrimination5608NNdiscrimination
cannot5609MDcan
,5610,,
without5611INwithout
more5612RBRmore
,5613,,
show5614VVshow
discriminatory5615JJdiscriminatory
treatment5616NNtreatment
...5617:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5618LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Excuse5619VVexcuse
me5620PPme
.5621SENT.
Can5622MDcan
I5623PPI
understand5624VVunderstand
your5625PP$your
argument5626NNargument
in5627INin
context5628NNcontext
?5629SENT?
Let5630VVlet
's5631VBZbe
answer5632VVanswer
the5633DTthe
question5634NNquestion
.5635SENT.
Employer5636NNemployer
looks5637VVZlook
at5638INat
a5639DTa
man5640NNman
who5641WPwho
applies5642VVZapply
and5643CCand
says5644VVZsay
:5645::
One5646CDOne
of5647INof
my5648PP$my
hobbies5649NNShobby
is5650VBZbe
sewing5651VVGsew
.5652SENT.
And5653CCand
the5654DTthe
employer5655NNemployer
says5656VVZsay
:5657::
That5658WDTthat
's5659VBZbe
an5660DTan
effeminate5661JJeffeminate
hobby5662NNhobby
.5663SENT.
You5664PPyou
may5665MDmay
be5666VBbe
gay5667JJgay
.5668SENT.
You're5669NNYou're
...5670:...
I5671PPI
'm5672VBPbe
not5673RBnot
hiring5674VVGhire
you5675PPyou
.5676SENT.
So5677RBso
is5678VBZbe
that5679IN/thatthat
a5680DTa
mixed5681JJmixed
motive5682NNmotive
case5683NNcase
?5684SENT?
And5685CCand
...5686:...
and5687CCand
are5688VBPbe
we5689PPwe
going5690VVGgo
to5691TOto
be5692VBbe
trying5693VVGtry
somehow5694RBsomehow
to5695TOto
parse5696VVparse
that5697IN/thatthat
there5698EXthere
's5699VBZbe
some5700DTsome
sort5701NNsort
of5702INof
substantial5703JJsubstantial
legal5704JJlegal
difference5705NNdifference
between5706INbetween
the5707DTthe
belief5708NNbelief
that5709IN/thatthat
you5710PPyou
're5711VBPbe
too5712RBtoo
effeminate5713JJeffeminate
or5714CCor
that5715IN/thatthat
a5716DTa
lesbian5717NNlesbian
is5718VBZbe
too5719RBtoo
macho5720JJmacho
,5721,,
whichever5722WDTwhichever
,5723,,
from5724INfrom
you5725PPyou
're5726VBPbe
attracted5727VVNattract
to5728TOto
the5729DTthe
other5730JJother
sex5731NNsex
?5732SENT?
How5733WRBHow
do5734VVPdo
you5735PPyou
tease5736VVPtease
that5737IN/thatthat
out5738RBout
?5739SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]5740LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Justice5741NPJustice
Sotomayor5742NPSotomayor
,5743,,
I5744PPI
do5745VVPdo
n't5746RBn't
disagree5747VVdisagree
that5748IN/thatthat
there5749EXthere
will5750MDwill
be5751VBbe
tough5752JJtough
cases5753NNScase
at5754INat
the5755DTthe
margins5756NNSmargin
,5757,,
but5758CCbut
the5759DTthe
problem5760NNproblem
with5761INwith
what5762WPwhat
the5763DTthe
Second5764JJsecond
Circuit5765NNcircuit
did5766VVDdo
is5767VBZbe
they5768PPthey
glossed5769VVDgloss
over5770INover
those5771DTthose
hard5772JJhard
questions5773NNSquestion
and5774CCand
said5775VVDsay
:5776::
We5777PPwe
're5778VBPbe
just5779RBjust
going5780VVGgo
to5781TOto
adopt5782VVadopt
...5783:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5784LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Well5785UHWell
,5786,,
are5787VBPbe
n't5788RBn't
you5789PPyou
105790CD@card@
...5791:...
MR5792NPMr
.5793SENT.
HARRIS5794NPHarris
...5795:...
a5796DTa
per5797FWper
se5798FWse
rule5799NNrule
that5800IN/thatthat
if5801INif
you5802PPyou
...5803:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5804LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...5805:...
are5806VBPbe
n't5807RBn't
you5808PPyou
glossing5809VVGgloss
over5810INover
the5811DTthe
BFOQ5812NPBFOQ
,5813,,
meaning5814NNmeaning
,5815,,
what5816WPwhat
it5817PPit
seems5818VVZseem
like5819INlike
you5820PPyou
're5821VBPbe
confusing5822VVGconfuse
is5823VBZbe
three5824CDthree
concepts5825NNSconcept
,5826,,
Title5827NPTitle
VII5828NPVII
has5829VHZhave
causation5830NNcausation
and5831CCand
injury5832NNinjury
.5833SENT.
Not5834RBnot
hiring5835VVGhire
,5836,,
not5837RBnot
firing5838NNfiring
,5839,,
that5840WDTthat
's5841VBZbe
the5842DTthe
injury5843NNinjury
.5844SENT.
Now5845RBnow
the5846DTthe
question5847NNquestion
is5848VBZbe
what5849WPwhat
caused5850VVDcause
that5851RBthat
?5852SENT?
Being5853VBGbe
too5854RBtoo
effeminate5855JJeffeminate
,5856,,
that5857WDTthat
's5858VBZbe
a5859DTa
sexual5860JJsexual
trait5861NNtrait
;5862:;
being5863VBGbe
attracted5864VVNattract
to5865TOto
,5866,,
if5867INif
you5868PPyou
're5869VBPbe
a5870DTa
man5871NNman
,5872,,
to5873TOto
another5874DTanother
man5875NNman
,5876,,
that5877WDTthat
's5878VBZbe
a5879DTa
sexual5880JJsexual
trait5881NNtrait
.5882SENT.
It5883PPit
's5884VBZbe
caused5885VVNcause
by5886INby
those5887DTthose
two5888CDtwo
things5889NNSthing
.5890SENT.
Are5891VBPbe
n't5892RBn't
then5893RBthen
we5894PPwe
moving5895VVGmove
to5896TOto
the5897DTthe
third5898JJthird
question5899NNquestion
,5900,,
which5901WDTwhich
is5902VBZbe
:5903::
Is5904VBZbe
there5905RBthere
a5906DTa
reason5907NNreason
independent5908JJindependent
of5909INof
your5910PP$your
religious5911JJreligious
belief5912NNbelief
or5913CCor
your5914PP$your
innate5915JJinnate
hatred5916NNhatred
and5917CCand
invidious5918JJinvidious
discrimination5919NNdiscrimination
for5920INfor
why5921WRBwhy
you5922PPyou
're5923VBPbe
treating5924VVGtreat
this5925DTthis
person5926NNperson
differently5927RBdifferently
?5928SENT?
And5929CCand
if5930INif
there5931EXthere
is5932VBZbe
,5933,,
you5934PPyou
have5935VHPhave
a5936DTa
BFOQ5937NPBFOQ
.5938SENT.
You5939PPyou
do5940VVPdo
n't5941RBn't
have5942VHhave
to5943TOto
hire5944VVhire
them5945PPthem
.5946SENT.
You5947PPyou
can5948MDcan
fire5949VVfire
them5950PPthem
.5951SENT.
But5952CCbut
if5953INif
there5954EXthere
is5955VBZbe
n't5956RBn't
,5957,,
they5958PPthey
're5959VBPbe
doing5960VVGdo
their5961PP$their
job5962NNjob
,5963,,
and5964CCand
they5965PPthey
're5966VBPbe
not5967RBnot
bothering5968VVGbother
you5969PPyou
,5970,,
and5971CCand
they5972PPthey
are5973VBPbe
not5974RBnot
bringing5975VVGbring
their5976PP$their
boyfriend5977NNboyfriend
or5978CCor
girlfriend5979NNgirlfriend
,5980,,
if5981INif
it5982PPit
's5983VBZbe
the5984DTthe
opposite5985JJopposite
sex5986NNsex
,5987,,
to5988TOto
a5989DTa
function5990NNfunction
to5991TOto
your5992PP$your
private5993JJprivate
home5994NNhome
because5995INbecause
you5996PPyou
do5997VVPdo
n't5998RBn't
want5999VVwant
them6000PPthem
there6001RBthere
or6002CCor
whatever6003WDTwhatever
else6004RBelse
is6005VBZbe
offensive6006JJoffensive
to6007TOto
you6008PPyou
,6009,,
they6010PPthey
're6011VBPbe
just6012RBjust
working6013VVGwork
.6014SENT.
So6015RBso
I6016PPI
do6017VVPdo
n't6018RBn't
understand6019VVunderstand
why6020WRBwhy
those6021DTthose
are6022VBPbe
hard6023JJhard
cases6024NNScase
.6025SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6026LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Well6027UHWell
...6028:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6029LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Any6030DTany
harder6031JJRhard
than6032INthan
what6033WPwhat
the6034DTthe
law6035NNlaw
applies6036VVZapply
for6037INfor
race6038NNrace
discrimination6039NNdiscrimination
,6040,,
for6041INfor
religious6042JJreligious
discrimination6043NNdiscrimination
,6044,,
for6045INfor
any6046DTany
of6047INof
the6048DTthe
other6049JJother
forms6050NNSform
,6051,,
national6052JJnational
origin6053NNorigin
discrimination6054NNdiscrimination
.6055SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6056LOC[MR. HARRIS]
So6057RBso
,6058,,
Your6059PP$your
Honor6060NPHonor
,6061,,
as6062INas
this6063DTthis
Court6064NPCourt
has6065VHZhave
emphasized6066VVNemphasize
in6067INin
cases6068NNScase
such6069JJsuch
as6070INas
Johnson6071NPJohnson
Controls6072NPControls
,6073,,
the6074DTthe
BFOQ6075NPBFOQ
exception6076NNexception
has6077VHZhave
been6078VBNbe
interpreted6079VVNinterpret
extremely6080RBextremely
narrowly6081RBnarrowly
,6082,,
and6083CCand
so6084RBso
I6085PPI
think6086VVPthink
it6087PPit
...6088:...
it6089PPit
...6090:...
it6091PPit
is6092VBZbe
important6093JJimportant
as6094INas
this6095DTthis
Court6096NPCourt
emphasized6097VVDemphasize
in6098INin
Oncale6099NPOncale
,6100,,
the6101DTthe
Court6102NPCourt
emphasized6103VVDemphasize
several6104JJseveral
times6105NNStime
the6106DTthe
need6107NNneed
to6108TOto
ensure6109VVensure
strict6110JJstrict
compliance6111NNcompliance
with6112INwith
all6113DTall
requirements6114NNSrequirement
of6115INof
the6116DTthe
statute6117NNstatute
,6118,,
including6119VVGinclude
the6120DTthe
discrimination6121NNdiscrimination
element6122NNelement
,6123,,
because6124INbecause
once6125RBonce
you6126PPyou
find6127VVPfind
discrimination6128NNdiscrimination
,6129,,
it6130PPit
gets6131VVZget
very6132RBvery
hard6133JJhard
to6134TOto
make6135VVmake
out6136RPout
the6137DTthe
BFOQ6138NPBFOQ
.6139SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]6140LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Would6141MDwould
Oncale6142NPOncale
...6143:...
[MR. HARRIS]6144LOC[MR. HARRIS]
So6145INso
you6146PPyou
do6147VVPdo
n't6148RBn't
...6149:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]6150LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Would6151MDwould
Oncale6152NPOncale
have6153VHPhave
come6154VVNcome
out6155RPout
differently6156RBdifferently
if6157INif
the6158DTthe
employer6159NNemployer
said6160VVDsay
,6161,,
I6162PPI
do6163VVPdo
n't6164RBn't
hire6165VVhire
women6166NNSwoman
to6167TOto
work6168VVwork
on6169INon
platforms6170NNSplatform
,6171,,
the6172DTthe
only6173JJonly
people6174NNSpeople
I6175PPI
hire6176VVPhire
are6177VBPbe
men6178NNSman
?6179SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]6180LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Well6181UHWell
,6182,,
that6183WDTthat
...6184:...
that6185WDTthat
obviously6186RBobviously
would6187MDwould
have6188VHhave
been6189VBNbe
discriminatory6190JJdiscriminatory
against6191INagainst
the6192DTthe
women6193NNSwoman
seeking6194VVGseek
...6195:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]6196LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But6197CCbut
it6198PPit
's6199VBZbe
not6200RBnot
...6201:...
[MR. HARRIS]6202LOC[MR. HARRIS]
...6203:...
the6204DTthe
job6205NNjob
.6206SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]6207LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...6208:...
the6209DTthe
woman6210NNwoman
who6211WPwho
is6212VBZbe
suing6213VVGsue
...6214:...
[MR. HARRIS]6215LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Right6216RBright
.6217SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]6218LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...6219:...
it6220PPit
's6221VBZbe
the6222DTthe
male6223NNmale
who6224WPwho
is6225VBZbe
being6226VBGbe
harassed6227VVNharass
by6228INby
other6229JJother
men6230NNSman
.6231SENT.
And6232CCand
the6233DTthe
employer6234NNemployer
's6235POS's
defense6236NNdefense
is6237VBZbe
,6238,,
you6239PPyou
can6240MDcan
't6241RB't
compare6242VVcompare
what6243WPwhat
I6244PPI
'm6245VBPbe
doing6246VVGdo
to6247TOto
someone6248NNsomeone
who6249WPwho
discriminates6250VVZdiscriminate
on6251INon
the6252DTthe
basis6253NNbasis
of6254INof
sex6255NNsex
between6256INbetween
men6257NNSman
and6258CCand
women6259NNSwoman
because6260INbecause
I6261PPI
do6262VVPdo
n't6263RBn't
hire6264VVhire
women6265NNSwoman
at6266INat
all6267DTall
.6268SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6269LOC[MR. HARRIS]
So6270INso
it6271PPit
's6272VBZbe
,6273,,
of6274INof
course6275NNcourse
...6276:...
it6277PPit
's6278VBZbe
...6279:...
it6280PPit
's6281VBZbe
not6282RBnot
a6283DTa
complete6284JJcomplete
defense6285NNdefense
or6286CCor
even6287RBeven
a6288DTa
defense6289NNdefense
to6290TOto
say6291VVsay
,6292,,
I6293PPI
treat6294VVPtreat
it6295PPit
...6296:...
in6297INin
cases6298NNScase
like6299INlike
Martin6300NPMartin
...6301:...
like6302INlike
Martin6303NPMartin
Marietta6304NPMarietta
,6305,,
it6306PPit
was6307VBDbe
not6308RBnot
a6309DTa
defense6310NNdefense
for6311INfor
that6312DTthat
employer6313NNemployer
to6314TOto
say6315VVsay
,6316,,
because6317INbecause
I6318PPI
hired6319VVDhire
other6320JJother
women6321NNSwoman
,6322,,
it6323PPit
excuses6324VVZexcuse
this6325DTthis
.6326SENT.
So6327INso
the6328DTthe
answer6329NNanswer
to6330TOto
your6331PP$your
question6332NNquestion
is6333VBZbe
that6334IN/thatthat
would6335MDwould
not6336RBnot
be6337VBbe
a6338DTa
defense6339NNdefense
.6340SENT.
But6341CCbut
...6342:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]6343LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
That6344DTthat
...6345:...
that6346WDTthat
was6347VBDbe
...6348:...
Martin6349NPMartin
Marietta6350NPMarietta
was6351VBDbe
different6352JJdifferent
because6353INbecause
it6354PPit
was6355VBDbe
the6356DTthe
plus6357NNplus
.6358SENT.
The6359DTthe
plus6360NNplus
applied6361VVNapply
to6362TOto
women6363NNSwoman
and6364CCand
did6365VVDdo
n't6366RBn't
apply6367VVapply
to6368TOto
men6369NNSman
.6370SENT.
So6371RBso
you6372PPyou
had6373VHDhave
that6374DTthat
distinction6375NNdistinction
.6376SENT.
Well6377UHwell
,6378,,
take6379VVtake
Price6380NPPrice
Waterhouse6381NPWaterhouse
.6382SENT.
Suppose6383VVsuppose
the6384DTthe
employer6385NNemployer
said6386VVDsay
,6387,,
I6388PPI
do6389VVPdo
n't6390RBn't
want6391VVwant
any6392DTany
men6393NNSman
who6394WPwho
are6395VBPbe
not6396RBnot
sufficiently6397RBsufficiently
macho6398JJmacho
,6399,,
and6400CCand
I6401PPI
do6402VVPdo
n't6403RBn't
want6404VVwant
any6405DTany
women6406NNSwoman
who6407WPwho
are6408VBPbe
not6409RBnot
sufficiently6410RBsufficiently
feminine6411JJfeminine
.6412SENT.
If6413INif
they6414PPthey
...6415:...
the6416DTthe
...6417:...
Price6418NPPrice
Waterhouse6419NPWaterhouse
said6420VVDsay
we6421PPwe
will6422MDwill
treat6423VVtreat
a6424DTa
man6425NNman
who6426WPwho
is6427VBZbe
n't6428RBn't
sufficiently6429RBsufficiently
macho6430JJmacho
the6431DTthe
same6432JJsame
way6433NNway
we6434PPwe
treated6435VVDtreat
Ann6436NPAnn
Hopkins6437NPHopkins
,6438,,
there6439EXthere
would6440MDwould
be6441VBbe
,6442,,
as6443INas
I6444PPI
understand6445VVPunderstand
your6446PP$your
argument6447NNargument
,6448,,
no6449DTno
sex6450NNsex
discrimination6451NNdiscrimination
.6452SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6453LOC[MR. HARRIS]
I6454PPI
...6455:...
I6456PPI
disagree6457VVPdisagree
with6458INwith
that6459DTthat
,6460,,
Justice6461NPJustice
Ginsburg6462NPGinsburg
.6463SENT.
The6464DTthe
way6465NNway
...6466:...
I6467PPI
think6468VVPthink
the6469DTthe
best6470JJSgood
way6471NNway
to6472TOto
think6473VVthink
of6474INof
Price6475NPPrice
Waterhouse6476NPWaterhouse
is6477VBZbe
,6478,,
when6479WRBwhen
an6480DTan
employer6481NNemployer
has6482VHZhave
certain6483JJcertain
traits6484NNStrait
or6485CCor
characteristics6486NNScharacteristic
that6487IN/thatthat
it6488PPit
values6489VVZvalue
in6490INin
promotion6491NNpromotion
and6492CCand
hiring6493NNhiring
and6494CCand
discharge6495NNdischarge
decisions6496NNSdecision
,6497,,
there6498EXthere
can6499MDcan
't6500RB't
be6501VBbe
a6502DTa
list6503NNlist
of6504INof
criteria6505NNScriterion
for6506INfor
men6507NNSman
and6508CCand
a6509DTa
list6510NNlist
of6511INof
criteria6512NNScriterion
for6513INfor
women6514NNSwoman
.6515SENT.
So6516INso
the6517DTthe
Solicitor6518NPSolicitor
General6519NPGeneral
offered6520VVDoffer
the6521DTthe
hypothetical6522JJhypothetical
that6523IN/thatthat
Your6524PP$your
Honor6525NPHonor
said6526VVDsay
.6527SENT.
And6528CCand
...6529:...
and6530CCand
in6531INin
that6532DTthat
situation6533NNsituation
,6534,,
there6535EXthere
would6536MDwould
be6537VBbe
two6538CDtwo
sets6539NNSset
of6540INof
criteria6541NNScriterion
.6542SENT.
And6543CCand
so6544RBso
maybe6545RBmaybe
both6546CCboth
a6547DTa
man6548NNman
who6549WPwho
does6550VVZdo
n't6551RBn't
meet6552VVmeet
the6553DTthe
women6554NNSwoman
's6555POS's
criteria6556NNScriterion
and6557CCand
a6558DTa
woman6559NNwoman
who6560WPwho
does6561VVZdo
n't6562RBn't
meet6563VVmeet
the6564DTthe
men6565NNSman
's6566POS's
criteria6567NNScriterion
would6568MDwould
have6569VHhave
a6570DTa
claim6571NNclaim
there6572RBthere
.6573SENT.
But6574CCbut
...6575:...
but6576CCbut
it6577PPit
would6578MDwould
n't6579RBn't
be6580VBbe
...6581:...
it6582PPit
would6583MDwould
not6584RBnot
excuse6585VVexcuse
it6586PPit
just6587RBjust
to6588TOto
say6589VVsay
that6590IN/thatthat
there6591EXthere
are6592VBPbe
different6593JJdifferent
criteria6594NNScriterion
for6595INfor
each6596DTeach
set6597NNset
.6598SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]6599LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Well6600UHWell
...6601:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]6602LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Suppose6603VVsuppose
...6604:...
suppose6605VVPsuppose
a6606DTa
Catholic6607NPCatholic
,6608,,
Jew6609NPJew
,6610,,
want6611VVPwant
to6612TOto
get6613VVget
married6614JJmarried
.6615SENT.
Employer6616NNemployer
fires6617VVZfire
the6618DTthe
Catholic6619NPCatholic
.6620SENT.
Why6621WRBwhy
?6622SENT?
He6623PPhe
's6624VBZbe
not6625RBnot
against6626INagainst
Catholics6627NPSCatholics
.6628SENT.
He6629PPhe
's6630VBZbe
against6631INagainst
intermarriage6632NNintermarriage
.6633SENT.
And6634CCand
obviously6635RBobviously
I6636PPI
can6637MDcan
use6638VVuse
the6639DTthe
same6640JJsame
example6641NNexample
with6642INwith
race6643NNrace
,6644,,
which6645WDTwhich
is6646VBZbe
famous6647JJfamous
.6648SENT.
I6649PPI
take6650VVPtake
it6651PPit
from6652INfrom
your6653PP$your
argument6654NNargument
that6655IN/thatthat
there6656EXthere
would6657MDwould
be6658VBbe
no6659DTno
claim6660NNclaim
?6661SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]6662LOC[MR. HARRIS]
There6663RBthere
would6664MDwould
,6665,,
in6666INin
fact6667NNfact
,6668,,
be6669VBbe
a6670DTa
claim6671NNclaim
,6672,,
in6673INin
both6674DTboth
...6675:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]6676LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Why6677WRBwhy
?6678SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]6679LOC[MR. HARRIS]
...6680:...
situations6681NNSsituation
.6682SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]6683LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Why6684NPWhy
?6685SENT?
Why6686WRBwhy
?6687SENT?
All6688DTall
right6689NNright
.6690SENT.
If6691INif
there6692EXthere
is6693VBZbe
a6694DTa
claim6695NNclaim
there6696RBthere
,6697,,
why6698WRBwhy
is6699VBZbe
n't6700RBn't
there6701RBthere
here6702RBhere
?6703SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]6704LOC[MR. HARRIS]
So6705RBso
in6706INin
the6707DTthe
race6708NNrace
context6709NNcontext
,6710,,
the6711DTthe
only6712JJonly
difference6713NNdifference
between6714INbetween
...6715:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]6716LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I6717PPI
did6718VVDdo
n't6719RBn't
say6720VVsay
race6721NNrace
.6722SENT.
I6723PPI
said6724VVDsay
religion6725NNreligion
.6726SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6727LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Right6728RBright
.6729SENT.
In6730RBin
...6731:...
in6732INin
the6733DTthe
...6734:...
in6735INin
the6736DTthe
context6737NNcontext
of6738INof
religion6739NNreligion
,6740,,
which6741WDTwhich
first6742JJfirst
of6743INof
all6744DTall
religion6745NNreligion
is6746VBZbe
defined6747VVNdefine
...6748:...
is6749VBZbe
the6750DTthe
only6751JJonly
one6752CDone
other6753JJother
than6754INthan
pregnancy6755NNpregnancy
which6756WDTwhich
has6757VHZhave
an6758DTan
expansive6759JJexpansive
definition6760NNdefinition
.6761SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]6762LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No6763NPNo
...6764:...
[MR. HARRIS]6765LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Yes6766NPYes
,6767,,
it6768PPit
would6769MDwould
be6770VBbe
religious6771JJreligious
discrimination6772NNdiscrimination
because6773INbecause
between6774INbetween
a6775DTa
couple6776NNcouple
that6777WDTthat
is6778VBZbe
Catholic6779JJCatholic
and6780CCand
Jewish6781JJJewish
and6782CCand
two6783CDtwo
Catholics6784NPSCatholics
,6785,,
the6786DTthe
only6787JJonly
difference6788NNdifference
between6789INbetween
those6790DTthose
couples6791NNScouple
is6792VBZbe
their6793PP$their
religion6794NNreligion
.6795SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]6796LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And6797CCand
the6798DTthe
only6799JJonly
difference6800NNdifference
between6801INbetween
the6802DTthe
two6803CDtwo
couples6804NNScouple
here6805RBhere
is6806VBZbe
that6807IN/thatthat
one6808PPone
is6809VBZbe
a6810DTa
man6811NNman
rather6812RBrather
than6813INthan
the6814DTthe
woman6815NNwoman
.6816SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6817LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Except6818INexcept
that6819WDTthat
it6820PPit
also6821RBalso
introduces6822VVZintroduce
an6823DTan
independent6824JJindependent
characteristic6825NNcharacteristic
,6826,,
which6827WDTwhich
can6828MDcan
be6829VBbe
completely6830RBcompletely
...6831:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]6832LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
All6833DTall
right6834NNright
.6835SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6836LOC[MR. HARRIS]
...6837:...
neutral6838JJneutral
to6839TOto
men6840NNSman
...6841:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]6842LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
So6843RBso
does6844VVZdo
it6845PPit
there6846RBthere
...6847:...
why6848WRBwhy
I6849PPI
'm6850VBPbe
not6851RBnot
against6852INagainst
Catholics6853NPSCatholics
,6854,,
I6855PPI
am6856VBPbe
not6857RBnot
against6858INagainst
Jews6859NNSJew
,6860,,
I6861PPI
am6862VBPbe
against6863INagainst
inter-marriage6864NNinter-marriage
?6865SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]6866LOC[MR. HARRIS]
I6867PPI
...6868:...
if6869INif
...6870:...
if6871INif
that6872DTthat
person6873NNperson
or6874CCor
actor6875NNactor
exists6876VVZexist
,6877,,
I6878PPI
think6879VVPthink
it6880PPit
's6881VBZbe
foreign6882JJforeign
to6883TOto
our6884PP$our
...6885:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]6886LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Oh6887UHoh
,6888,,
it6889PPit
exists6890VVZexist
.6891SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6892LOC[MR. HARRIS]
...6893:...
case6894NNcase
law6895NNlaw
.6896SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]6897LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I6898PPI
promise6899VVPpromise
you6900PPyou
.6901SENT.
There6902EXthere
are6903VBPbe
many6904JJmany
people6905NNSpeople
,6906,,
at6907INat
least6908JJSleast
in6909INin
the6910DTthe
religious6911JJreligious
context6912NNcontext
,6913,,
who6914WPwho
are6915VBPbe
against6916INagainst
inter-marriage6917NNinter-marriage
and6918CCand
are6919VBPbe
not6920RBnot
against6921INagainst
Catholics6922NPSCatholics
or6923CCor
Jews6924NPSJews
.6925SENT.
That6926DTthat
's6927VBZbe
not6928RBnot
an6929DTan
unrealistic6930JJunrealistic
example6931NNexample
.6932SENT.
And6933CCand
all6934RBall
I6935PPI
find6936VVPfind
in6937INin
that6938DTthat
example6939NNexample
is6940VBZbe
an6941DTan
identical6942JJidentical
case6943NNcase
to6944TOto
this6945DTthis
one6946CDone
.6947SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]6948LOC[MR. HARRIS]
And6949CCand
I6950PPI
...6951:...
I6952PPI
think6953VVPthink
that6954DTthat
...6955:...
I6956PPI
do6957VVPdo
think6958VVthink
that6959IN/thatthat
most6960JJSmost
of6961INof
the6962DTthe
...6963:...
most6964JJSmost
people6965NNSpeople
who6966WPwho
would6967MDwould
oppose6968VVoppose
any6969DTany
sort6970NNsort
of6971INof
interreligious6972JJinterreligious
marriage6973NNmarriage
would6974MDwould
do6975VVdo
so6976RBso
for6977INfor
religious6978JJreligious
reasons6979NNSreason
.6980SENT.
And6981CCand
I6982PPI
would6983MDwould
also6984RBalso
note6985VVnote
in6986INin
the6987DTthe
...6988:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6989LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Mr6990NPMr
.6991SENT.
Harris6992NPHarris
,6993,,
I6994PPI
think6995VVPthink
...6996:...
I6997PPI
think6998VVPthink
what6999WPwhat
all7000DTall
of7001INof
these7002DTthese
hypotheticals7003NNShypotheticals
are7004VBPbe
about7005RBabout
is7006VBZbe
that7007IN/thatthat
in7008INin
many7009JJmany
of7010INof
our7011PP$our
cases7012NNScase
,7013,,
what7014WPwhat
you7015PPyou
find7016VVPfind
is7017VBZbe
what7018WPwhat
you7019PPyou
said7020VVDsay
,7021,,
what7022WPwhat
did7023VVDdo
you7024PPyou
say7025VVPsay
,7026,,
independent7027JJindependent
characteristics7028NNScharacteristic
?7029SENT?
They7030PPthey
're7031VBPbe
all7032RBall
over7033INover
our7034PP$our
cases7035NNScase
.7036SENT.
If7037INif
you7038PPyou
take7039VVPtake
Manhart7040NPManhart
,7041,,
which7042WDTwhich
is7043VBZbe
the7044DTthe
seminal7045JJseminal
case7046NNcase
,7047,,
Manhart7048NPManhart
was7049VBDbe
all7050RBall
about7051INabout
an7052DTan
independent7053JJindependent
characteristic7054NNcharacteristic
.7055SENT.
It7056PPit
was7057VBDbe
about7058INabout
life7059NNlife
expectancy7060NNexpectancy
.7061SENT.
But7062CCbut
we7063PPwe
did7064VVDdo
n't7065RBn't
say7066VVsay
,7067,,
oh7068UHoh
,7069,,
we7070PPwe
're7071VBPbe
going7072VVGgo
into7073INinto
some7074DTsome
different7075JJdifferent
sort7076NNsort
of7077INof
analysis7078NNanalysis
where7079WRBwhere
we7080PPwe
do7081VVPdo
n't7082RBn't
just7083RBjust
say7084VVPsay
would7085MDwould
the7086DTthe
same7087JJsame
thing7088NNthing
have7089VHPhave
happened7090VVNhappen
to7091TOto
you7092PPyou
if7093INif
you7094PPyou
were7095VBDbe
a7096DTa
man7097NNman
or7098CCor
would7099MDwould
the7100DTthe
same7101JJsame
thing7102NNthing
have7103VHPhave
happened7104VVNhappen
to7105TOto
you7106PPyou
if7107INif
you7108PPyou
were7109VBDbe
a7110DTa
woman7111NNwoman
,7112,,
because7113INbecause
we7114PPwe
had7115VHDhave
an7116DTan
independent7117JJindependent
characteristic7118NNcharacteristic
,7119,,
which7120WDTwhich
was7121VBDbe
life7122NNlife
expectancy7123NNexpectancy
.7124SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]7125LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Right7126NPRight
.7127SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7128LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
And7129CCand
...7130:...
and7131CCand
so7132RBso
the7133DTthe
same7134JJsame
thing7135NNthing
here7136RBhere
.7137SENT.
So7138RBso
all7139RBall
of7140INof
these7141DTthese
hypotheticals7142NNShypotheticals
are7143VBPbe
really7144RBreally
about7145INabout
the7146DTthe
same7147JJsame
thing7148NNthing
,7149,,
which7150WDTwhich
is7151VBZbe
that7152IN/thatthat
Manhart7153NPManhart
gave7154VVDgive
us7155PPus
a7156DTa
very7157RBvery
simple7158JJsimple
test7159NNtest
,7160,,
and7161CCand
Manhart7162NPManhart
said7163VVDsay
,7164,,
what7165WPwhat
you7166PPyou
do7167VVPdo
when7168WRBwhen
you7169PPyou
look7170VVPlook
to7171TOto
see7172VVsee
whether7173INwhether
there7174EXthere
is7175VBZbe
discrimination7176NNdiscrimination
under7177INunder
Title7178NPTitle
VII7179NPVII
is7180VBZbe
,7181,,
you7182PPyou
say7183VVPsay
,7184,,
would7185MDwould
the7186DTthe
same7187JJsame
thing7188NNthing
have7189VHPhave
happened7190VVNhappen
to7191TOto
you7192PPyou
if7193INif
you7194PPyou
were7195VBDbe
of7196INof
a7197DTa
different7198JJdifferent
sex7199NNsex
?7200SENT?
And7201CCand
,7202,,
Ms7203NNMs
.7204SENT.
Karlan7205NPKarlan
made7206VVDmake
all7207PDTall
the7208DTthe
...7209:...
you7210PPyou
know7211VVPknow
,7212,,
went7213VVDgo
through7214INthrough
all7215PDTall
the7216DTthe
ways7217NNSway
in7218INin
which7219WDTwhich
,7220,,
obviously7221RBobviously
,7222,,
the7223DTthe
...7224:...
the7225DTthe
same7226JJsame
thing7227NNthing
would7228MDwould
not7229RBnot
have7230VHhave
happened7231VVNhappen
to7232TOto
you7233PPyou
if7234INif
you7235PPyou
were7236VBDbe
a7237DTa
different7238JJdifferent
sex7239NNsex
,7240,,
you7241PPyou
being7242VBGbe
her7243PP$her
client7244NNclient
.7245SENT.
So7246RBso
,7247,,
I7248PPI
mean7249VVPmean
,7250,,
that7251WDTthat
's7252VBZbe
the7253DTthe
question7254NNquestion
.7255SENT.
There7256EXthere
are7257VBPbe
independent7258JJindependent
characteristics7259NNScharacteristic
in7260INin
all7261PDTall
these7262DTthese
cases7263NNScase
.7264SENT.
We7265PPwe
have7266VHPhave
insisted7267VVNinsist
on7268INon
this7269DTthis
extremely7270RBextremely
simple7271JJsimple
test7272NNtest
.7273SENT.
If7274INif
you7275PPyou
apply7276VVPapply
that7277DTthat
test7278NNtest
,7279,,
I7280PPI
guess7281VVPguess
it7282PPit
seems7283VVZseem
to7284TOto
come7285VVcome
out7286RPout
against7287INagainst
you7288PPyou
.7289SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]7290LOC[MR. HARRIS]
A7291DTa
couple7292NNcouple
things7293NNSthing
.7294SENT.
First7295RBfirst
,7296,,
let7297VVlet
me7298PPme
address7299VVaddress
Manhart7300NPManhart
and7301CCand
then7302RBthen
address7303VVaddress
...7304:...
address7305VVaddress
the7306DTthe
test7307NNtest
more7308RBRmore
generally7309RBgenerally
.7310SENT.
So7311RBso
in7312INin
Manhart7313NPManhart
,7314,,
this7315DTthis
Court7316NPCourt
noted7317VVDnote
that7318IN/thatthat
the7319DTthe
...7320:...
the7321DTthe
policy7322NNpolicy
was7323VBDbe
n't7324RBn't
just7325RBjust
about7326INabout
longevity7327NNlongevity
.7328SENT.
That7329DTthat
...7330:...
that7331DTthat
employer7332NNemployer
made7333VVDmake
no7334DTno
attempt7335NNattempt
to7336TOto
do7337VVdo
any7338DTany
sort7339NNsort
of7340INof
bona7341NNbona
fide7342NNfide
underwriting7343NNunderwriting
or7344CCor
life7345NNlife
expectancy7346NNexpectancy
estimates7347NNSestimate
.7348SENT.
It7349PPit
simply7350RBsimply
charged7351VVDcharge
the7352DTthe
women7353NNSwoman
more7354RBRmore
.7355SENT.
So7356RBso
even7357RBeven
a7358DTa
woman7359NNwoman
and7360CCand
a7361DTa
man7362NNman
,7363,,
if7364INif
they7365PPthey
each7366RBeach
had7367VHDhave
a7368DTa
75-year7369JJ75-year
life7370NNlife
expectancy7371NNexpectancy
,7372,,
they7373PPthey
would7374MDwould
be7375VBbe
charged7376VVNcharge
different7377JJdifferent
rates7378NNSrate
,7379,,
even7380RBeven
though7381INthough
they7382PPthey
were7383VBDbe
totally7384RBtotally
,7385,,
similarly7386RBsimilarly
situated7387VVNsituate
with7388INwith
respect7389NNrespect
to7390TOto
that7391DTthat
.7392SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7393LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Yes7394NPYes
,7395,,
but7396CCbut
Manhart7397NPManhart
was7398VBDbe
very7399RBvery
clear7400JJclear
that7401IN/thatthat
women7402NNSwoman
in7403INin
the7404DTthe
aggregate7405NNaggregate
were7406VBDbe
probably7407RBprobably
going7408VVGgo
to7409TOto
be7410VBbe
fine7411JJfine
under7412INunder
this7413DTthis
policy7414NNpolicy
,7415,,
because7416INbecause
women7417NNSwoman
in7418INin
the7419DTthe
aggregate7420NNaggregate
do7421VVPdo
have7422VHhave
a7423DTa
higher7424JJRhigh
life7425NNlife
expectancy7426NNexpectancy
.7427SENT.
I7428PPI
mean7429VVPmean
,7430,,
I7431PPI
think7432VVPthink
actually7433RBactually
Manhart7434NPManhart
makes7435VVZmake
clear7436JJclear
why7437WRBwhy
another7438DTanother
aspect7439NNaspect
of7440INof
your7441PP$your
argument7442NNargument
is7443VBZbe
...7444:...
is7445VBZbe
wrong7446JJwrong
,7447,,
because7448INbecause
you7449PPyou
say7450VVPsay
,7451,,
well7452RBwell
,7453,,
we7454PPwe
have7455VHPhave
to7456TOto
look7457VVlook
at7458INat
these7459DTthese
big7460JJbig
classes7461NNSclass
.7462SENT.
Well7463UHwell
,7464,,
there7465EXthere
was7466VBDbe
nothing7467NNnothing
wrong7468JJwrong
in7469INin
Manhart7470NPManhart
when7471WRBwhen
you7472PPyou
looked7473VVDlook
at7474INat
big7475JJbig
classes7476NNSclass
.7477SENT.
What7478WPWhat
became7479VVDbecome
wrong7480JJwrong
in7481INin
Manhart7482NPManhart
was7483VBDbe
when7484WRBwhen
you7485PPyou
looked7486VVDlook
at7487INat
individuals7488NNSindividual
.7489SENT.
And7490CCand
when7491WRBwhen
you7492PPyou
look7493VVPlook
at7494INat
individuals7495NNSindividual
,7496,,
which7497WDTwhich
Manhart7498NPManhart
insisted7499VVDinsist
one7500PPone
do7501VVPdo
,7502,,
one7503PPone
should7504MDshould
do7505VVdo
,7506,,
and7507CCand
when7508WRBwhen
you7509PPyou
apply7510VVPapply
the7511DTthe
test7512NNtest
that7513IN/thatthat
Manhart7514NPManhart
insisted7515VVDinsist
you7516PPyou
apply7517VVPapply
,7518,,
would7519MDwould
this7520DTthis
woman7521NNwoman
have7522VHPhave
been7523VBNbe
treated7524VVNtreat
differently7525RBdifferently
if7526INif
she7527PPshe
were7528VBDbe
a7529DTa
man7530NNman
?7531SENT?
The7532DTthe
answer7533NNanswer
was7534VBDbe
yes7535RByes
.7536SENT.
And7537CCand
,7538,,
similarly7539RBsimilarly
,7540,,
I7541PPI
guess7542VVPguess
I7543PPI
'm7544VBPbe
just7545RBjust
going7546VVGgo
to7547TOto
ask7548VVask
you7549PPyou
again7550RBagain
,7551,,
if7552INif
you7553PPyou
applied7554VVDapply
that7555DTthat
test7556NNtest
,7557,,
do7558VVPdo
n't7559RBn't
you7560PPyou
lose7561VVPlose
?7562SENT?
And7563CCand
if7564INif
you7565PPyou
do7566VVPdo
lose7567VVlose
,7568,,
why7569WRBwhy
should7570MDshould
we7571PPwe
not7572RBnot
apply7573VVPapply
that7574DTthat
test7575NNtest
?7576SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]7577LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Here7578RBhere
's7579VBZbe
the7580DTthe
problem7581NNproblem
with7582INwith
the7583DTthe
test7584NNtest
.7585SENT.
In7586INin
Manhart7587NPManhart
,7588,,
in7589INin
Newport7590NPNewport
News7591NPNews
,7592,,
in7593INin
Martin7594NPMartin
Marietta7595NPMarietta
,7596,,
the7597DTthe
comparator7598NNcomparator
test7599NNtest
makes7600VVZmake
perfect7601JJperfect
sense7602NNsense
because7603INbecause
you7604PPyou
know7605VVPknow
exactly7606RBexactly
what7607WPwhat
you7608PPyou
're7609VBPbe
testing7610VVGtest
for7611INfor
,7612,,
so7613RBso
the7614DTthe
comparator7615NNcomparator
helps7616VVZhelp
you7617PPyou
draw7618VVdraw
inferences7619NNSinference
from7620INfrom
the7621DTthe
evidence7622NNevidence
.7623SENT.
The7624DTthe
problem7625NNproblem
here7626RBhere
is7627VBZbe
,7628,,
unless7629INunless
the7630DTthe
Plaintiffs7631NNSplaintiff
can7632MDcan
point7633VVpoint
to7634TOto
something7635NNsomething
outside7636INoutside
the7637DTthe
comparator7638NNcomparator
to7639TOto
tell7640VVtell
us7641PPus
why7642WRBwhy
we7643PPwe
need7644VVPneed
to7645TOto
hold7646VVhold
sexual7647JJsexual
orientation7648NNorientation
...7649:...
to7650TOto
...7651:...
to7652TOto
tell7653VVtell
us7654PPus
why7655WRBwhy
that7656DTthat
is7657VBZbe
irrelevant7658JJirrelevant
,7659,,
they7660PPthey
're7661VBPbe
...7662:...
they7663PPthey
're7664VBPbe
just7665RBjust
assuming7666VVGassume
their7667PP$their
conclusion7668NNconclusion
.7669SENT.
So7670INso
their7671PP$their
comparator7672NNcomparator
would7673MDwould
say7674VVsay
,7675,,
you7676PPyou
would7677MDwould
ask7678VVask
if7679INif
a7680DTa
gay7681JJgay
man7682NNman
has7683VHZhave
suffered7684VVNsuffer
sex7685NNsex
discrimination7686NNdiscrimination
by7687INby
comparing7688VVGcompare
him7689PPhim
to7690TOto
a7691DTa
heterosexual7692JJheterosexual
woman7693NNwoman
,7694,,
which7695WDTwhich
that7696DTthat
version7697NNversion
of7698INof
the7699DTthe
comparator7700NNcomparator
can7701MDcan
't7702RB't
isolate7703NNisolate
if7704INif
it7705PPit
's7706VBZbe
the7707DTthe
sex7708NNsex
or7709CCor
the7710DTthe
sexual7711JJsexual
orientation7712NNorientation
.7713SENT.
And7714CCand
so7715RBso
I7716PPI
do7717VVPdo
think7718VVthink
,7719,,
unless7720INunless
they7721PPthey
can7722MDcan
point7723VVpoint
to7724TOto
something7725NNsomething
outside7726INoutside
the7727DTthe
comparator7728NNcomparator
,7729,,
to7730TOto
justify7731VVjustify
putting7732VVGput
sexual7733JJsexual
orientation7734NNorientation
off7735INoff
limits7736NNSlimit
...7737:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]7738LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well7739UHWell
...7740:...
[MR. HARRIS]7741LOC[MR. HARRIS]
...7742:...
the7743DTthe
comparator7744NNcomparator
does7745VVZdo
n't7746RBn't
...7747:...
does7748VVZdo
n't7749RBn't
answer7750VVanswer
the7751DTthe
ultimate7752JJultimate
question7753NNquestion
.7754SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]7755LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well7756UHwell
,7757,,
it7758PPit
certainly7759RBcertainly
may7760MDmay
not7761RBnot
answer7762VVanswer
...7763:...
isolate7764VVisolate
the7765DTthe
sole7766JJsole
or7767CCor
proximate7768JJproximate
cause7769NNcause
,7770,,
but7771CCbut
I7772PPI
...7773:...
I7774PPI
think7775VVPthink
the7776DTthe
...7777:...
the7778DTthe
argument7779NNargument
on7780INon
the7781DTthe
other7782JJother
side7783NNside
is7784VBZbe
the7785DTthe
language7786NNlanguage
of7787INof
the7788DTthe
statute7789NNstatute
has7790VHZhave
a7791DTa
but-for7792NNbut-for
causation7793NNcausation
standard7794NNstandard
,7795,,
a7796DTa
more7797RBRmore
generous7798JJgenerous
causation7799NNcausation
standard7800NNstandard
.7801SENT.
So7802RBso
perhaps7803RBperhaps
there7804EXthere
are7805VBPbe
two7806CDtwo
causal7807JJcausal
factors7808NNSfactor
at7809INat
work7810NNwork
here7811RBhere
.7812SENT.
But7813CCbut
is7814VBZbe
n't7815RBn't
one7816CDone
of7817INof
them7818PPthem
sex7819NNsex
in7820INin
the7821DTthe
narrow7822JJnarrow
sense7823NNsense
of7824INof
...7825:...
of7826INof
...7827:...
of7828INof
biological7829JJbiological
gender7830NNgender
?7831SENT?
What's7832NNSWhat's
...7833:...
what7834WPwhat
's7835VBZbe
your7836PP$your
response7837NNresponse
to7838TOto
that7839DTthat
?7840SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]7841LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Yeah7842NPYeah
.7843SENT.
So7844RBso
in7845INin
the7846DTthe
...7847:...
what7848WPwhat
I7849PPI
'm7850VBPbe
arguing7851VVGargue
is7852VBZbe
simply7853RBsimply
that7854DTthat
sexual7855JJsexual
orientation7856NNorientation
standing7857NNstanding
alone7858RBalone
is7859VBZbe
not7860RBnot
,7861,,
without7862INwithout
more7863JJRmore
,7864,,
sex7865NNsex
discrimination7866NNdiscrimination
.7867SENT.
And7868CCand
so7869RBso
the7870DTthe
...7871:...
I7872PPI
'm7873VBPbe
sorry7874JJsorry
,7875,,
remind7876VVremind
me7877PPme
of7878INof
the7879DTthe
question7880NNquestion
one7881CDone
more7882JJRmore
time7883NNtime
?7884SENT?
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]7885LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Sure7886NPSure
.7887SENT.
So7888INso
the7889DTthe
...7890:...
[MR. HARRIS]7891LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Right7892RBright
.7893SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]7894LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Your7895PP$your
...7896:...
your7897PP$your
response7898NNresponse
to7899TOto
Justice7900NPJustice
Kagan7901NPKagan
was7902VBDbe
,7903,,
I7904PPI
need7905VVPneed
to7906TOto
focus7907VVfocus
on7908INon
sexual7909JJsexual
orientation7910NNorientation
because7911INbecause
that7912WDTthat
's7913VBZbe
the7914DTthe
sole7915JJsole
or7916CCor
primary7917JJprimary
causal7918JJcausal
factor7919NNfactor
here7920RBhere
for7921INfor
the7922DTthe
firing7923NNfiring
.7924SENT.
And7925CCand
I7926PPI
think7927VVPthink
the7928DTthe
response7929NNresponse
from7930INfrom
the7931DTthe
other7932JJother
side7933NNside
is7934VBZbe
:7935::
But7936CCbut
the7937DTthe
statute7938NNstatute
has7939VHZhave
a7940DTa
more7941RBRmore
generous7942JJgenerous
causal7943JJcausal
...7944:...
[MR. HARRIS]7945LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Okay7946NPOkay
.7947SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]7948LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...7949:...
formulation7950NNformulation
,7951,,
a7952DTa
but-for7953NNbut-for
causal7954JJcausal
formulation7955NNformulation
,7956,,
so7957RBso
perhaps7958RBperhaps
you7959PPyou
're7960VBPbe
right7961JJright
that7962IN/thatthat
,7963,,
at7964INat
some7965DTsome
level7966NNlevel
,7967,,
sexual7968JJsexual
orientation7969NNorientation
is7970VBZbe
surely7971RBsurely
in7972INin
...7973:...
in7974INin
play7975NNplay
here7976RBhere
.7977SENT.
But7978CCbut
is7979VBZbe
n't7980RBn't
sex7981NNsex
also7982RBalso
in7983INin
play7984VVplay
here7985RBhere
because7986INbecause
of7987INof
the7988DTthe
change7989NNchange
of7990INof
the7991DTthe
first7992JJfirst
variable7993NNvariable
?7994SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]7995LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Right7996RBright
.7997SENT.
So7998RBso
I7999PPI
think8000VVPthink
...8001:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]8002LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
And8003CCand
is8004VBZbe
n't8005RBn't
that8006DTthat
enough8007NNenough
?8008SENT?
It8009PPit
...8010:...
you8011PPyou
know8012VVPknow
,8013,,
the8014DTthe
statute8015NNstatute
talks8016NNStalk
about8017INabout
a8018DTa
material8019JJmaterial
causal8020JJcausal
factor8021NNfactor
or8022CCor
some8023DTsome
formulation8024NNformulation
like8025INlike
that8026DTthat
,8027,,
not8028RBnot
the8029DTthe
sole8030JJsole
cause8031NNcause
,8032,,
not8033RBnot
the8034DTthe
proximate8035JJproximate
cause8036NNcause
,8037,,
but8038CCbut
a8039DTa
cause8040NNcause
.8041SENT.
And8042CCand
one8043PPone
...8044:...
one8045PPone
would8046MDwould
...8047:...
in8048INin
what8049WPwhat
...8050:...
in8051INin
what8052WPwhat
linguistic8053JJlinguistic
formulation8054NNformulation
would8055MDwould
one8056CDone
...8057:...
would8058MDwould
one8059PPone
say8060VVsay
that8061DTthat
sex8062NNsex
,8063,,
biological8064JJbiological
gender8065NNgender
,8066,,
has8067VHZhave
nothing8068NNnothing
to8069TOto
do8070VVdo
with8071INwith
what8072WPwhat
happened8073VVDhappen
in8074INin
this8075DTthis
case8076NNcase
?8077SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]8078LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Yes8079NPYes
,8080,,
Your8081PP$your
Honor8082NPHonor
.8083SENT.
So8084RBso
what8085WPwhat
you8086PPyou
're8087VBPbe
referring8088VVGrefer
to8089TOto
,8090,,
I8091PPI
believe8092VVPbelieve
,8093,,
is8094VBZbe
the8095DTthe
motivating8096VVGmotivate
factor8097NNfactor
language8098NNlanguage
.8099SENT.
And8100CCand
so8101RBso
,8102,,
in8103INin
what8104WPwhat
I8105PPI
just8106RBjust
referred8107VVDrefer
to8108TOto
as8109INas
the8110DTthe
sort8111NNsort
of8112INof
benchmark8113JJbenchmark
scenario8114NNscenario
,8115,,
sex8116NNsex
would8117MDwould
not8118RBnot
be8119VBbe
a8120DTa
motivating8121VVGmotivate
factor8122NNfactor
there8123RBthere
.8124SENT.
If8125INif
you8126PPyou
look8127VVPlook
at8128INat
Mr8129NPMr
.8130SENT.
Bostock8131NPBostock
's8132POS's
complaint8133NNcomplaint
,8134,,
for8135INfor
example8136NNexample
,8137,,
and8138CCand
you8139PPyou
strip8140VVstrip
out8141RPout
any8142DTany
mention8143NNmention
of8144INof
his8145PP$his
sex8146NNsex
as8147INas
being8148VBGbe
a8149DTa
man8150NNman
,8151,,
again8152RBagain
,8153,,
we8154PPwe
...8155:...
we8156PPwe
dispute8157VVPdispute
the8158DTthe
allegations8159NNSallegation
,8160,,
of8161INof
course8162NNcourse
,8163,,
but8164CCbut
it8165PPit
would8166MDwould
still8167RBstill
make8168VVmake
perfect8169JJperfect
sense8170NNsense
.8171SENT.
But8172CCbut
if8173INif
you8174PPyou
stripped8175VVDstrip
out8176RPout
any8177DTany
reference8178NNreference
to8179TOto
his8180PP$his
sexual8181JJsexual
orientation8182NNorientation
,8183,,
it8184PPit
would8185MDwould
make8186VVmake
little8187RBlittle
,8188,,
if8189INif
any8190DTany
,8191,,
sense8192NNsense
.8193SENT.
And8194CCand
so8195RBso
in8196INin
Price8197NPPrice
Waterhouse8198NPWaterhouse
,8199,,
this8200DTthis
Court8201NPCourt
helped8202VVDhelp
give8203VVgive
guidance8204NNguidance
about8205INabout
how8206WRBhow
to8207TOto
do8208VVdo
the8209DTthe
motivating8210VVGmotivate
factor8211NNfactor
analysis8212NNanalysis
and8213CCand
said8214VVDsay
imagine8215VVimagine
you8216PPyou
gave8217VVDgive
the8218DTthe
employer8219NNemployer
truth8220NNtruth
serum8221NNserum
and8222CCand
said8223VVDsay
what8224WPwhat
were8225VBDbe
your8226PP$your
true8227JJtrue
reasons8228NNSreason
for8229INfor
doing8230VVGdo
this8231DTthis
?8232SENT?
Would8233MDwould
one8234PPone
of8235INof
them8236PPthem
be8237VBbe
the8238DTthe
characteristic8239NNcharacteristic
?8240SENT?
And8241CCand
what8242WPwhat
I8243PPI
would8244MDwould
call8245VVcall
that8246DTthat
...8247:...
that8248DTthat
benchmark8249JJbenchmark
scenario8250NNscenario
...8251:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]8252LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
All8253DTall
right8254NNright
,8255,,
let8256VVNlet
's8257POS's
...8258:...
[MR. HARRIS]8259LOC[MR. HARRIS]
...8260:...
sex8261NNsex
would8262MDwould
not8263RBnot
be8264VBbe
...8265:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]8266LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Let8267VVlet
's8268VBZbe
do8269VVdo
truth8270NNtruth
serum8271NNserum
,8272,,
okay8273JJokay
?8274SENT?
Wouldn't8275NNWouldn't
...8276:...
would8277MDwould
n't8278RBn't
the8279DTthe
employer8280NNemployer
maybe8281RBmaybe
say8282VVPsay
it8283PPit
's8284VBZbe
because8285INbecause
this8286DTthis
was8287VBDbe
...8288:...
this8289DTthis
person8290NNperson
was8291VBDbe
a8292DTa
man8293NNman
who8294WPwho
liked8295VVDlike
other8296JJother
men8297NNSman
?8298SENT?
And8299CCand
is8300VBZbe
n't8301RBn't
that8302DTthat
first8303JJfirst
part8304NNpart
sex8305NNsex
?8306SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]8307LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Your8308PP$your
Honor8309NPHonor
,8310,,
I8311PPI
think8312VVPthink
in8313INin
common8314JJcommon
parlance8315NNparlance
,8316,,
we8317PPwe
would8318MDwould
call8319VVcall
that8320IN/thatthat
a8321DTa
same-sex8322NNsame-sex
attraction8323NNattraction
.8324SENT.
And8325CCand
I8326PPI
want8327VVPwant
to8328TOto
be8329VBbe
clear8330JJclear
,8331,,
if8332INif
there8333EXthere
is8334VBZbe
some8335DTsome
reason8336NNreason
to8337TOto
think8338VVthink
that8339DTthat
employer8340NNemployer
...8341:...
and8342CCand
some8343DTsome
of8344INof
the8345DTthe
amicus8346NNamicus
briefs8347NNSbrief
say8348VVPsay
that8349IN/thatthat
much8350JJmuch
discrimination8351NNdiscrimination
against8352INagainst
gay8353JJgay
and8354CCand
lesbian8355JJlesbian
people8356NNSpeople
is8357VBZbe
...8358:...
is8359VBZbe
based8360VVNbase
on8361INon
sort8362NNsort
of8363INof
animus8364NNanimus
against8365INagainst
gay8366JJgay
men8367NNSman
or8368CCor
lesbian8369JJlesbian
women8370NNSwoman
.8371SENT.
If8372INif
there8373EXthere
's8374VBZbe
some8375DTsome
reason8376NNreason
to8377TOto
believe8378VVbelieve
that8379IN/thatthat
in8380INin
that8381DTthat
scenario8382NNscenario
,8383,,
then8384RBthen
that8385DTthat
may8386MDmay
well8387RBwell
be8388VBbe
a8389DTa
motivating8390VVGmotivate
factor8391NNfactor
,8392,,
but8393CCbut
when8394WRBwhen
you8395PPyou
simply8396RBsimply
have8397VHPhave
an8398DTan
employee8399NNemployee
saying8400VVGsay
I8401PPI
was8402VBDbe
fired8403VVNfire
because8404INbecause
of8405INof
my8406PP$my
sexual8407JJsexual
orientation8408NNorientation
,8409,,
that8410WDTthat
alone8411RBalone
does8412VVZdo
not8413RBnot
show8414VVshow
that8415DTthat
...8416:...
what8417WPwhat
...8418:...
what8419WPwhat
this8420DTthis
Court8421NPCourt
called8422VVDcall
in8423INin
Oncale8424NPOncale
the8425DTthe
critical8426JJcritical
...8427:...
critical8428JJcritical
issue8429NNissue
of8430INof
distinguishing8431VVGdistinguish
between8432INbetween
men8433NNSman
and8434CCand
women8435NNSwoman
.8436SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8437LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Are8438VBPbe
you8439PPyou
drawing8440VVGdraw
a8441DTa
distinction8442NNdistinction
between8443INbetween
the8444DTthe
literal8445JJliteral
meaning8446NNmeaning
of8447INof
"8448``"
because8449INbecause
of8450INof
sex8451NNsex
"8452''"
and8453CCand
the8454DTthe
ordinary8455JJordinary
meaning8456NNmeaning
of8457INof
"8458``"
because8459INbecause
of8460INof
sex8461NNsex
"8462''"
?8463SENT?
And8464CCand
,8465,,
if8466INif
so8467RBso
,8468,,
how8469WRBhow
are8470VBPbe
we8471PPwe
supposed8472VVNsuppose
to8473TOto
think8474VVthink
about8475INabout
ordinary8476JJordinary
meaning8477NNmeaning
in8478INin
this8479DTthis
case8480NNcase
?8481SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]8482LOC[MR. HARRIS]
I8483PPI
do8484VVPdo
n't8485RBn't
see8486VVsee
a8487DTa
difference8488NNdifference
between8489INbetween
the8490DTthe
two8491CDtwo
as8492RBas
far8493RBfar
as8494RBas
...8495:...
and8496CCand
...8497:...
and8498CCand
the8499DTthe
last8500JJlast
point8501NNpoint
,8502,,
running8503VVGrun
out8504RPout
of8505INof
time8506NNtime
,8507,,
I8508PPI
think8509VVPthink
to8510TOto
go8511VVgo
back8512RBback
to8513TOto
some8514DTsome
of8515INof
the8516DTthe
questions8517NNSquestion
about8518INabout
bathrooms8519NNSbathroom
and8520CCand
fitness8521NNfitness
standards8522NNSstandard
,8523,,
I8524PPI
want8525VVPwant
to8526TOto
be8527VBbe
clear8528JJclear
,8529,,
under8530INunder
the8531DTthe
Plaintiff8532NNplaintiff
's8533POS's
simple8534JJsimple
but-for8535NNbut-for
test8536NNtest
,8537,,
if8538INif
you8539PPyou
truly8540RBtruly
simply8541RBsimply
apply8542VVapply
the8543DTthe
Manhart8544NPManhart
test8545NNtest
or8546CCor
...8547:...
in8548INin
the8549DTthe
way8550NNway
they8551PPthey
want8552VVPwant
to8553TOto
do8554VVdo
it8555PPit
,8556,,
I8557PPI
do8558VVPdo
n't8559RBn't
see8560VVsee
any8561DTany
way8562NNway
that8563IN/thatthat
single-sex8564NNsingle-sex
bathrooms8565NNSbathroom
or8566CCor
showering8567VVGshower
facilities8568NNSfacility
...8569:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]8570LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
You8571PPyou
have8572VHPhave
to8573TOto
have8574VHhave
someone8575NNsomeone
who8576WPwho
's8577VBZbe
injured8578VVNinjure
.8579SENT.
You8580PPyou
have8581VHPhave
to8582TOto
have8583VHhave
someone8584NNsomeone
who8585WPwho
's8586VBZbe
injured8587VVNinjure
.8588SENT.
And8589CCand
the8590DTthe
response8591NNresponse
to8592TOto
the8593DTthe
bathrooms8594NNSbathroom
is8595VBZbe
who8596WPwho
is8597VBZbe
the8598DTthe
complaining8599VVGcomplain
plaintiff8600NNplaintiff
?8601SENT?
And8602CCand
for8603INfor
most8604JJSmost
people8605NNSpeople
,8606,,
they8607PPthey
would8608MDwould
not8609RBnot
be8610VBbe
complaining8611VVGcomplain
plaintiff8612NNplaintiff
.8613SENT.
They8614PPthey
would8615MDwould
not8616RBnot
be8617VBbe
eligible8618JJeligible
because8619INbecause
they8620PPthey
're8621VBPbe
not8622RBnot
injured8623VVNinjure
by8624INby
the8625DTthe
separate8626JJseparate
bathrooms8627NNSbathroom
.8628SENT.
In8629INin
fact8630NNfact
,8631,,
they8632PPthey
like8633VVPlike
it8634PPit
.8635SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]8636LOC[MR. HARRIS]
Yes8637NPYes
,8638,,
Your8639PP$your
Honor8640NPHonor
,8641,,
although8642INalthough
,8643,,
of8644INof
course8645NNcourse
,8646,,
if8647INif
someone8648NNsomeone
,8649,,
for8650INfor
example8651NNexample
,8652,,
is8653VBZbe
fired8654VVNfire
,8655,,
imagine8656VVimagine
a8657DTa
factory8658NNfactory
with8659INwith
hazardous8660JJhazardous
materials8661NNSmaterial
where8662WRBwhere
people8663NNSpeople
shower8664VVPshower
after8665INafter
work8666NNwork
and8667CCand
to8668TOto
...8669:...
to8670TOto
clean8671VVclean
up8672RPup
,8673,,
and8674CCand
a8675DTa
...8676:...
a8677DTa
man8678NNman
used8679VVDuse
the8680DTthe
women8681NNSwoman
's8682POS's
bathroom8683NNbathroom
and8684CCand
is8685VBZbe
fired8686VVNfire
.8687SENT.
That8688DTthat
person8689NNperson
would8690MDwould
certainly8691RBcertainly
be8692VBbe
injured8693VVNinjure
.8694SENT.
And8695CCand
I8696PPI
think8697VVPthink
,8698,,
under8699INunder
my8700PP$my
friend8701NNfriend
's8702POS's
test8703NNtest
,8704,,
they8705PPthey
would8706MDwould
say8707VVsay
just8708RBjust
change8709VVchange
the8710DTthe
sex8711NNsex
and8712CCand
that8713DTthat
person8714NNperson
would8715MDwould
n't8716RBn't
have8717VHhave
been8718VBNbe
fired8719VVNfire
.8720SENT.
But8721CCbut
here8722RBhere
's8723VBZbe
the8724DTthe
problem8725NNproblem
:8726::
That8727WDTthat
's8728VBZbe
not8729RBnot
a8730DTa
similarly8731RBsimilarly
situated8732VVNsituate
person8733NNperson
.8734SENT.
The8735DTthe
proper8736JJproper
analysis8737NNanalysis
would8738MDwould
say8739VVsay
that8740IN/thatthat
a8741DTa
neutral8742JJneutral
policy8743NNpolicy
,8744,,
such8745JJsuch
as8746INas
use8747NNuse
the8748DTthe
showering8749VVGshower
facility8750NNfacility
that8751WDTthat
corresponds8752VVZcorrespond
to8753TOto
your8754PP$your
biological8755JJbiological
sex8756NNsex
,8757,,
the8758DTthe
man8759NNman
who8760WPwho
uses8761VVZuse
the8762DTthe
women8763NNSwoman
's8764POS's
shower8765NNshower
,8766,,
the8767DTthe
...8768:...
the8769DTthe
comparator8770NNcomparator
is8771VBZbe
not8772RBnot
a8773DTa
woman8774NNwoman
who8775WPwho
uses8776VVZuse
the8777DTthe
woman8778NNwoman
's8779POS's
shower8780NNshower
.8781SENT.
It8782PPit
's8783VBZbe
a8784DTa
woman8785NNwoman
who8786WPwho
uses8787VVZuse
the8788DTthe
men8789NNSman
's8790POS's
shower8791NNshower
,8792,,
because8793INbecause
otherwise8794RBotherwise
you8795PPyou
're8796VBPbe
not8797RBnot
...8798:...
otherwise8799RBotherwise
you8800PPyou
're8801VBPbe
...8802:...
you8803PPyou
're8804VBPbe
loading8805VVGload
the8806DTthe
dice8807NNdice
or8808CCor
you8809PPyou
're8810VBPbe
not8811RBnot
looking8812VVGlook
at8813INat
similarly8814RBsimilarly
situated8815VVNsituate
people8816NNSpeople
.8817SENT.
And8818CCand
the8819DTthe
last8820JJlast
thing8821NNthing
I8822PPI
'd8823MDwould
like8824VVlike
to8825TOto
get8826VVget
into8827INinto
is8828VBZbe
this8829DTthis
Court8830NPCourt
,8831,,
in8832INin
Espinoza8833NPEspinoza
,8834,,
Footnote8835NNfootnote
28836CD2
...8837:...
I8838PPI
think8839VVPthink
there8840EXthere
was8841VBDbe
some8842DTsome
discussion8843NNdiscussion
of8844INof
the8845DTthe
states8846NNSstate
early8847RBearly
on8848INon
.8849SENT.
In8850INin
Espinoza8851NPEspinoza
,8852,,
in8853INin
interpreting8854VVGinterpret
national8855JJnational
origin8856NNorigin
discrimination8857NNdiscrimination
,8858,,
this8859DTthis
Court8860NPCourt
said8861VVDsay
the8862DTthe
state8863NNstate
practice8864NNpractice
interpreting8865VVGinterpret
parallel8866JJparallel
laws8867NNSlaw
is8868VBZbe
highly8869RBhighly
instructive8870JJinstructive
.8871SENT.
And8872CCand
so8873INso
I8874PPI
...8875:...
I8876PPI
think8877VVPthink
the8878DTthe
fact8879NNfact
that8880IN/thatthat
or8881CCor
238882CD@card@
states8883NNSstate
have8884VHPhave
done8885VVNdo
this8886DTthis
by8887INby
legislation8888NNlegislation
and8889CCand
zero8890CDzero
have8891VHPhave
done8892VVNdo
it8893PPit
by8894INby
judicial8895JJjudicial
interpretation8896NNinterpretation
,8897,,
just8898RBjust
shows8899VVZshow
that8900IN/thatthat
this8901DTthis
is8902VBZbe
n't8903RBn't
belt8904NNbelt
and8905CCand
suspenders8906NNSsuspender
.8907SENT.
It8908PPit
's8909VBZbe
not8910RBnot
redundancy8911NNredundancy
,8912,,
that8913DTthat
sex8914NNsex
and8915CCand
sexual8916JJsexual
orientation8917NNorientation
both8918CCboth
in8919INin
19648920CD@card@
and8921CCand
today8922NNtoday
are8923VBPbe
different8924JJdifferent
concepts8925NNSconcept
that8926WDTthat
mean8927VVPmean
different8928JJdifferent
things8929NNSthing
,8930,,
and8931CCand
common8932JJcommon
users8933NNSuser
of8934INof
...8935:...
of8936INof
language8937NNlanguage
both8938CCboth
today8939NNtoday
and8940CCand
in8941INin
19648942CD@card@
would8943MDwould
have8944VHhave
recognized8945VVNrecognize
that8946DTthat
.8947SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8948LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Can8949MDcan
they8950PPthey
ever8951RBever
be8952VBbe
?8953SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]8954LOC[MR. HARRIS]
I8955PPI
'm8956VBPbe
sorry8957JJsorry
?8958SENT?
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8959LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I8960PPI
know8961VVPknow
...8962:...
can8963MDcan
they8964PPthey
ever8965RBever
be8966VBbe
?8967SENT?
Justice8968NPJustice
...8969:...
justice8970NNjustice
...8971:...
Judge8972NPJudge
Lynch8973NPLynch
below8974RBbelow
said8975VVDsay
that8976IN/thatthat
homophobic8977JJhomophobic
stereotypes8978NNSstereotype
are8979VBPbe
unrelated8980JJunrelated
to8981TOto
sexual8982JJsexual
orientation8983NNorientation
.8984SENT.
The8985DTthe
very8986RBvery
first8987JJfirst
case8988NNcase
before8989INbefore
us8990PPus
shows8991VVZshow
that8992IN/thatthat
that8993DTthat
's8994VBZbe
just8995RBjust
not8996RBnot
true8997JJtrue
,8998,,
that8999DTthat
homosexual9000JJhomosexual
orientation9001NNorientation
is9002VBZbe
highly9003RBhighly
correlated9004VVNcorrelate
to9005TOto
people9006NNSpeople
's9007POS's
stereotypes9008NNSstereotype
.9009SENT.
If9010INif
you9011PPyou
're9012VBPbe
too9013RBtoo
effeminate9014JJeffeminate
a9015DTa
man9016NNman
,9017,,
you9018PPyou
're9019VBPbe
a9020DTa
homosexual9021NNhomosexual
.9022SENT.
If9023INif
you9024PPyou
're9025VBPbe
too9026RBtoo
macho9027JJmacho
a9028DTa
woman9029NNwoman
,9030,,
you9031PPyou
're9032VBPbe
a9033DTa
lesbian9034NNlesbian
.9035SENT.
Happens9036VVZhappen
all9037PDTall
the9038DTthe
time9039NNtime
.9040SENT.
So9041RBso
I9042PPI
find9043VVPfind
it9044PPit
somewhat9045RBsomewhat
difficult9046JJdifficult
to9047TOto
unwind9048VVunwind
the9049DTthe
two9050CDtwo
.9051SENT.
If9052INif
not9053RBnot
difficult9054JJdifficult
,9055,,
nearly9056RBnearly
impossible9057JJimpossible
.9058SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]9059LOC[MR. HARRIS]
It9060PPit
often9061RBoften
is9062VBZbe
,9063,,
Your9064PP$your
Honor9065NPHonor
,9066,,
and9067CCand
it9068PPit
's9069VBZbe
a9070DTa
sad9071JJsad
reality9072NNreality
that9073IN/thatthat
homophobic9074JJhomophobic
slurs9075NNSslur
are9076VBPbe
often9077RBoften
directed9078VVNdirect
at9079INat
heterosexual9080JJheterosexual
or9081CCor
homosexual9082JJhomosexual
people9083NNSpeople
to9084TOto
...9085:...
to9086TOto
criticize9087VVcriticize
...9088:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]9089LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
And9090CCand
that9091WDTthat
's9092VBZbe
okay9093JJokay
under9094INunder
your9095PP$your
theory9096NNtheory
?9097SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]9098LOC[MR. HARRIS]
It9099PPit
is9100VBZbe
absolutely9101RBabsolutely
not9102RBnot
,9103,,
Your9104PP$your
Honor9105NPHonor
,9106,,
if9107INif
that9108WDTthat
person9109NNperson
can9110MDcan
show9111VVshow
discrimination9112NNdiscrimination
because9113INbecause
of9114INof
sex9115NNsex
,9116,,
but9117CCbut
what9118WPwhat
...9119:...
what9120WPwhat
the9121DTthe
courts9122NNScourt
can9123MDcan
't9124RB't
do9125VVPdo
is9126VBZbe
what9127WPwhat
the9128DTthe
Second9129NPSecond
Circuit9130NPCircuit
did9131VVDdo
and9132CCand
the9133DTthe
Seventh9134NPSeventh
Circuit9135NPCircuit
did9136VVDdo
in9137INin
Hively9138NPHively
.9139SENT.
Footnote9140NNfootnote
119141CD@card@
of9142INof
the9143DTthe
Zarda9144NPZarda
opinion9145NNopinion
is9146VBZbe
very9147RBvery
candid9148JJcandid
about9149RBabout
this9150DTthis
where9151WRBwhere
it9152PPit
talks9153VVZtalk
about9154INabout
operationalizing9155VVGoperationalizing
its9156PP$its
holding9157NNholding
.9158SENT.
The9159DTthe
Second9160NPSecond
Circuit9161NPCircuit
is9162VBZbe
just9163RBjust
going9164VVGgo
to9165TOto
change9166VVchange
the9167DTthe
jury9168NNjury
instructions9169NNSinstruction
to9170TOto
tell9171VVtell
juries9172NNSjury
that9173IN/thatthat
if9174INif
they9175PPthey
find9176VVPfind
sexual9177JJsexual
orientation9178NNorientation
discrimination9179NNdiscrimination
,9180,,
they9181PPthey
've9182VHPhave
now9183RBnow
found9184VVNfind
sex9185NNsex
discrimination9186NNdiscrimination
.9187SENT.
So9188RBso
,9189,,
Justice9190NPJustice
Sotomayor9191NPSotomayor
,9192,,
I9193PPI
do9194VVPdo
n't9195RBn't
disagree9196VVdisagree
that9197IN/thatthat
there9198EXthere
will9199MDwill
be9200VBbe
difficult9201JJdifficult
cases9202NNScase
at9203INat
the9204DTthe
margins9205NNSmargin
,9206,,
but9207CCbut
the9208DTthe
answer9209NNanswer
is9210VBZbe
not9211RBnot
to9212TOto
change9213VVchange
the9214DTthe
ultimate9215JJultimate
inquiry9216NNinquiry
and9217CCand
replace9218VVreplace
it9219PPit
with9220INwith
something9221NNsomething
that9222IN/thatthat
Congress9223NPCongress
never9224RBnever
could9225MDcould
have9226VHhave
intended9227VVNintend
.9228SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]9229LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well9230UHWell
,9231,,
if9232INif
you9233PPyou
have9234VHPhave
a9235DTa
minute9236NNminute
,9237,,
let9238VVlet
me9239PPme
ask9240VVask
you9241PPyou
this9242DTthis
:9243::
Let9244VVlet
's9245VBZbe
imagine9246VVimagine
that9247IN/thatthat
the9248DTthe
decisionmaker9249NNdecisionmaker
in9250INin
a9251DTa
particular9252JJparticular
case9253NNcase
is9254VBZbe
behind9255INbehind
the9256DTthe
veil9257NNveil
of9258INof
ignorance9259NNignorance
and9260CCand
the9261DTthe
subordinate9262NNsubordinate
who9263WPwho
has9264VHZhave
reviewed9265VVNreview
the9266DTthe
candidates9267NNScandidate
for9268INfor
a9269DTa
position9270NNposition
says9271VVZsay
:9272::
I9273PPI
'm9274VBPbe
going9275VVGgo
to9276TOto
tell9277VVtell
you9278PPyou
two9279CDtwo
things9280NNSthing
about9281INabout
this9282DTthis
candidate9283NNcandidate
.9284SENT.
This9285DTthis
is9286VBZbe
the9287DTthe
very9288RBvery
best9289JJSgood
candidate9290NNcandidate
for9291INfor
the9292DTthe
job9293NNjob
,9294,,
and9295CCand
this9296DTthis
candidate9297NNcandidate
is9298VBZbe
attracted9299VVNattract
to9300TOto
members9301NNSmember
of9302INof
the9303DTthe
same9304JJsame
sex9305NNsex
.9306SENT.
And9307CCand
the9308DTthe
employer9309NNemployer
says9310VVZsay
:9311::
Okay9312JJokay
,9313,,
I9314PPI
'm9315VBPbe
going9316VVGgo
...9317:...
I9318PPI
'm9319VBPbe
not9320RBnot
going9321VVGgo
to9322TOto
hire9323VVhire
this9324DTthis
person9325NNperson
for9326INfor
that9327DTthat
reason9328NNreason
.9329SENT.
Is9330VBZbe
that9331DTthat
discrimination9332NNdiscrimination
on9333INon
the9334DTthe
basis9335NNbasis
of9336INof
sex9337NNsex
,9338,,
where9339WRBwhere
the9340DTthe
employer9341NNemployer
does9342VVZdo
n't9343RBn't
even9344RBeven
know9345VVknow
the9346DTthe
sex9347NNsex
of9348INof
the9349DTthe
individual9350NNindividual
involved9351VVDinvolve
?9352SENT?
[MR. HARRIS]9353LOC[MR. HARRIS]
May9354NPmay
I9355PPI
?9356SENT?
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9357LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Please9358RBplease
.9359SENT.
[MR. HARRIS]9360LOC[MR. HARRIS]
That9361DTthat
would9362MDwould
not9363RBnot
be9364VBbe
discrimination9365NNdiscrimination
on9366INon
the9367DTthe
basis9368NNbasis
of9369INof
sex9370NNsex
.9371SENT.
And9372CCand
I9373PPI
think9374VVPthink
that9375WDTthat
's9376VBZbe
exactly9377RBexactly
right9378JJright
.9379SENT.
If9380INif
you9381PPyou
get9382VVPget
a9383DTa
resume9384NNresume
that9385WDTthat
...9386:...
that9387WDTthat
has9388VHZhave
a9389DTa
name9390NNname
that9391WDTthat
could9392MDcould
be9393VBbe
male9394JJmale
or9395CCor
female9396JJfemale
,9397,,
and9398CCand
there9399EXthere
's9400VBZbe
something9401NNsomething
on9402INon
there9403RBthere
suggesting9404VVGsuggest
that9405IN/thatthat
the9406DTthe
person9407NNperson
is9408VBZbe
gay9409JJgay
and9410CCand
they9411PPthey
're9412VBPbe
not9413RBnot
hired9414VVNhire
for9415INfor
that9416DTthat
reason9417NNreason
,9418,,
that9419WDTthat
would9420MDwould
be9421VBbe
sexual9422JJsexual
orientation9423NNorientation
discrimination9424NNdiscrimination
.9425SENT.
That9426DTthat
has9427VHZhave
absolutely9428RBabsolutely
nothing9429NNnothing
whatsoever9430RBwhatsoever
to9431TOto
do9432VVdo
with9433INwith
sex9434NNsex
discrimination9435NNdiscrimination
.9436SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9437LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank9438VVthank
you9439PPyou
,9440,,
counsel9441NNcounsel
.9442SENT.
General9443NPGeneral
Francisco9444NPFrancisco
.9445SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9446LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Mr9447NPMr
.9448SENT.
Chief9449NPChief
Justice9450NPJustice
,9451,,
and9452CCand
may9453MDmay
it9454PPit
please9455VVplease
the9456DTthe
Court9457NPCourt
:9458::
The9459DTthe
issue9460NNissue
is9461VBZbe
not9462RBnot
whether9463INwhether
Congress9464NPCongress
can9465MDcan
or9466CCor
should9467MDshould
prohibit9468VVprohibit
employment9469NNemployment
discrimination9470NNdiscrimination
because9471INbecause
of9472INof
sexual9473JJsexual
orientation9474NNorientation
.9475SENT.
The9476DTthe
issue9477NNissue
,9478,,
rather9479RBrather
,9480,,
is9481VBZbe
whether9482INwhether
it9483PPit
did9484VVDdo
so9485RBso
when9486WRBwhen
it9487PPit
prohibited9488VVDprohibit
discrimination9489NNdiscrimination
because9490INbecause
of9491INof
sex9492NNsex
.9493SENT.
It9494PPit
did9495VVDdo
not9496RBnot
for9497INfor
two9498CDtwo
reasons9499NNSreason
.9500SENT.
First9501RBfirst
,9502,,
sex9503NNsex
means9504VVZmean
whether9505INwhether
you9506PPyou
're9507VBPbe
male9508JJmale
or9509CCor
female9510JJfemale
,9511,,
not9512RBnot
whether9513INwhether
you9514PPyou
're9515VBPbe
gay9516JJgay
or9517CCor
straight9518JJstraight
.9519SENT.
So9520RBso
if9521INif
you9522PPyou
treat9523VVPtreat
all9524DTall
gay9525JJgay
and9526CCand
men9527NNSman
...9528:...
gay9529JJgay
men9530NNSman
and9531CCand
women9532NNSwoman
exactly9533RBexactly
the9534DTthe
same9535JJsame
regardless9536RBregardless
of9537INof
their9538PP$their
sex9539NNsex
,9540,,
you9541PPyou
're9542VBPbe
not9543RBnot
discriminating9544VVGdiscriminate
against9545INagainst
them9546PPthem
because9547INbecause
of9548INof
their9549PP$their
sex9550NNsex
.9551SENT.
Second9552RBsecond
,9553,,
any9554DTany
doubt9555NNdoubt
is9556VBZbe
removed9557VVNremove
by9558INby
the9559DTthe
history9560NNhistory
of9561INof
Title9562NPTitle
VII9563NPVII
and9564CCand
related9565JJrelated
statutes9566NNSstatute
since9567INsince
,9568,,
in9569INin
the9570DTthe
face9571NNface
of9572INof
unanimous9573JJunanimous
interpretation9574NNinterpretation
by9575INby
the9576DTthe
courts9577NNScourt
and9578CCand
the9579DTthe
executive9580JJexecutive
branch9581NNbranch
that9582WDTthat
persisted9583VVDpersist
for9584INfor
decades9585NNSdecade
,9586,,
Congress9587NPCongress
has9588VHZhave
repeatedly9589RBrepeatedly
extended9590VVNextend
other9591JJother
statutes9592NNSstatute
to9593TOto
specifically9594RBspecifically
cover9595VVcover
sexual9596JJsexual
orientation9597NNorientation
,9598,,
yet9599RByet
has9600VHZhave
refused9601VVNrefuse
to9602TOto
do9603VVdo
so9604RBso
with9605INwith
respect9606NNrespect
to9607TOto
Title9608NPTitle
VII9609NPVII
.9610SENT.
The9611DTthe
employee9612NNemployee
's9613POS's
position9614NNposition
would9615MDwould
nullify9616VVnullify
that9617DTthat
conscious9618JJconscious
choice9619NNchoice
.9620SENT.
And9621CCand
Justice9622NPJustice
Gorsuch9623NPGorsuch
,9624,,
if9625INif
I9626PPI
could9627MDcould
first9628RBfirst
address9629VVaddress
your9630PP$your
question9631NNquestion
about9632INabout
our9633PP$our
...9634:...
my9635PP$my
friend9636NNfriend
on9637INon
the9638DTthe
other9639JJother
side9640NNside
's9641POS's
argument9642NNargument
about9643INabout
the9644DTthe
literal9645JJliteral
meaning9646NNmeaning
of9647INof
the9648DTthe
statute9649NNstatute
,9650,,
well9651RBwell
,9652,,
there9653EXthere
are9654VBPbe
essentially9655RBessentially
two9656CDtwo
responses9657NNSresponse
to9658TOto
that9659DTthat
argument9660NNargument
.9661SENT.
And9662CCand
they9663PPthey
're9664VBPbe
related9665VVNrelate
.9666SENT.
The9667DTthe
first9668JJfirst
is9669VBZbe
that9670IN/thatthat
under9671INunder
that9672DTthat
interpretation9673NNinterpretation
,9674,,
you9675PPyou
actually9676RBactually
could9677MDcould
n't9678RBn't
fire9679VVfire
a9680DTa
man9681NNman
for9682INfor
using9683VVGuse
the9684DTthe
woman9685NNwoman
's9686POS's
restroom9687NNrestroom
because9688INbecause
in9689INin
some9690DTsome
metaphysical9691JJmetaphysical
sense9692NNsense
,9693,,
that9694DTthat
man9695NNman
's9696POS's
sex9697NNsex
is9698VBZbe
a9699DTa
but-for9700NNbut-for
cause9701NNcause
for9702INfor
his9703PP$his
firing9704NNfiring
.9705SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9706LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But9707CCbut
he9708PPhe
's9709VBZbe
not9710RBnot
...9711:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9712LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
The9713DTthe
reason9714NNreason
...9715:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9716LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...9717:...
injured9718VVNinjure
.9719SENT.
He9720PPhe
's9721VBZbe
not9722RBnot
injured9723VVNinjure
.9724SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9725LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Well9726UHwell
,9727,,
he9728PPhe
's9729VBZbe
fired9730VVNfire
,9731,,
Your9732PP$your
Honor9733NPHonor
,9734,,
in9735INin
my9736PP$my
hypothetical9737JJhypothetical
.9738SENT.
And9739CCand
the9740DTthe
reason9741NNreason
why9742WRBwhy
that9743DTthat
is9744VBZbe
permitted9745VVNpermit
...9746:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9747LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I9748PPI
think9749VVPthink
counsel9750NNcounsel
acknowledged9751VVDacknowledge
all9752RBall
of9753INof
that9754DTthat
.9755SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9756LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yeah9757NPYeah
.9758SENT.
And9759CCand
the9760DTthe
reason9761NNreason
why9762WRBwhy
that9763DTthat
's9764VBZbe
permitted9765VVNpermit
,9766,,
though9767RBthough
,9768,,
to9769TOto
do9770VVdo
that9771IN/thatthat
,9772,,
is9773VBZbe
because9774INbecause
you9775PPyou
're9776VBPbe
treating9777VVGtreat
...9778:...
and9779CCand
this9780DTthis
is9781VBZbe
my9782PP$my
second9783JJsecond
point9784NNpoint
...9785:...
you9786PPyou
're9787VBPbe
treating9788VVGtreat
him9789PPhim
the9790DTthe
...9791:...
the9792DTthe
same9793JJsame
as9794INas
a9795DTa
similarly9796RBsimilarly
situated9797VVNsituate
woman9798NNwoman
;9799:;
that9800WDTthat
is9801VBZbe
,9802,,
a9803DTa
woman9804NNwoman
who9805WPwho
uses9806VVZuse
the9807DTthe
men9808NNSman
's9809POS's
room9810NNroom
.9811SENT.
And9812CCand
that9813DTthat
's9814VBZbe
always9815RBalways
the9816DTthe
critical9817JJcritical
analysis9818NNanalysis
when9819WRBwhen
you9820PPyou
're9821VBPbe
trying9822VVGtry
to9823TOto
determine9824VVdetermine
if9825INif
somebody9826NNsomebody
is9827VBZbe
being9828JJbeing
...9829:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9830LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Is9831VBZbe
it9832PPit
...9833:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9834LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...9835:...
discriminated9836VVNdiscriminate
against9837INagainst
because9838INbecause
...9839:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9840LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Is9841VBZbe
it9842PPit
...9843:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9844LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...9845:...
of9846INof
their9847PP$their
sex9848NNsex
.9849SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9850LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Is9851VBZbe
it9852PPit
...9853:...
let9854VVlet
me9855PPme
give9856VVgive
you9857PPyou
a9858DTa
not-hypothetical9859JJnot-hypothetical
case9860NNcase
.9861SENT.
An9862DTan
airline9863NNairline
hires9864VVZhire
only9865JJonly
women9866NNSwoman
as9867INas
cabin9868NNcabin
attendants9869NNSattendant
,9870,,
but9871CCbut
it9872PPit
fires9873VVZfire
them9874PPthem
if9875INif
they9876PPthey
marry9877VVPmarry
.9878SENT.
The9879DTthe
airline9880NNairline
's9881POS's
defense9882NNdefense
is9883VBZbe
whatever9884WDTwhatever
we9885PPwe
're9886VBPbe
doing9887VVGdo
,9888,,
it9889PPit
's9890VBZbe
not9891RBnot
sex9892NNsex
discrimination9893NNdiscrimination
against9894INagainst
women9895NNSwoman
because9896INbecause
we9897PPwe
do9898VVPdo
n't9899RBn't
hire9900VVhire
any9901DTany
men9902NNSman
at9903INat
all9904DTall
,9905,,
married9906JJmarried
or9907CCor
unmarried9908JJunmarried
.9909SENT.
That9910DTthat
case9911NNcase
,9912,,
I9913PPI
take9914VVPtake
it9915PPit
from9916INfrom
your9917PP$your
brief9918NNbrief
,9919,,
you9920PPyou
would9921MDwould
say9922VVsay
there9923EXthere
's9924VBZbe
no9925DTno
sex9926NNsex
...9927:...
no9928DTno
violation9929NNviolation
of9930INof
Title9931NPTitle
VII9932NPVII
?9933SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9934LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Well9935UHwell
...9936:...
well9937UHwell
,9938,,
no9939UHno
,9940,,
Your9941PP$your
Honor9942NPHonor
,9943,,
because9944INbecause
I9945PPI
think9946VVPthink
the9947DTthe
problem9948NNproblem
is9949VBZbe
that9950IN/thatthat
the9951DTthe
prohibition9952NNprohibition
on9953INon
hiring9954VVGhire
any9955DTany
male9956JJmale
flight9957NNflight
attendants9958NNSattendant
would9959MDwould
in9960INin
and9961CCand
of9962INof
itself9963PPitself
violate9964VVPviolate
...9965:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9966LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
That9967DTthat
...9968:...
but9969RBbut
...9970:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9971LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...9972:...
Title9973NPTitle
VII9974NPVII
.9975SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9976LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But9977CCbut
the9978DTthe
male9979NNmale
is9980VBZbe
not9981RBnot
complaining9982VVGcomplain
.9983SENT.
The9984DTthe
complainant9985NNcomplainant
is9986VBZbe
the9987DTthe
woman9988NNwoman
who9989WPwho
was9990VBDbe
fired9991VVNfire
because9992INbecause
she9993PPshe
married9994VVDmarry
.9995SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]9996LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Okay9997NPOkay
.9998SENT.
So9999RBso
then10000RBthen
...10001:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10002LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
The10003DTthe
male10004JJmale
complainant10005NNcomplainant
might10006MDmight
have10007VHhave
a10008DTa
very10009RBvery
good10010JJgood
case10011NNcase
,10012,,
but10013CCbut
my10014PP$my
case10015NNcase
...10016:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10017LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right10018NPRight
,10019,,
and10020CCand
my10021PP$my
...10022:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10023LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...10024:...
is10025VBZbe
the10026DTthe
woman10027NNwoman
.10028SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10029LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
And10030CCand
my10031PP$my
problem10032NNproblem
with10033INwith
the10034DTthe
hypothetical10035JJhypothetical
is10036VBZbe
that10037IN/thatthat
the10038DTthe
way10039NNway
it10040PPit
is10041VBZbe
constructed10042VVNconstruct
,10043,,
there10044EXthere
is10045VBZbe
,10046,,
you10047PPyou
know10048VVPknow
,10049,,
presumably10050RBpresumably
no10051DTno
men10052NNSman
that10053WDTthat
have10054VHPhave
the10055DTthe
job10056NNjob
in10057INin
the10058DTthe
first10059JJfirst
place10060NNplace
.10061SENT.
Now10062RBnow
,10063,,
if10064INif
you10065PPyou
say10066VVPsay
that10067IN/thatthat
in10068INin
theory10069NNtheory
men10070NNSman
should10071MDshould
be10072VBbe
able10073JJable
to10074TOto
have10075VHhave
the10076DTthe
job10077NNjob
,10078,,
then10079RBthen
the10080DTthe
question10081NNquestion
would10082MDwould
be10083VBbe
would10084MDwould
you10085PPyou
also10086RBalso
have10087VHPhave
fired10088VVNfire
men10089NNSman
who10090WPwho
were10091VBDbe
married10092VVNmarry
?10093SENT?
And10094CCand
if10095INif
you10096PPyou
only10097RBonly
fired10098VVDfire
women10099NNSwoman
who10100WPwho
were10101VBDbe
married10102VVNmarry
but10103CCbut
not10104RBnot
men10105NNSman
who10106WPwho
married10107VVDmarry
,10108,,
that10109WDTthat
would10110MDwould
plainly10111RBplainly
be10112VBbe
a10113DTa
violation10114NNviolation
of10115INof
Title10116NPTitle
VII10117NPVII
because10118INbecause
you10119PPyou
're10120VBPbe
treating10121VVGtreat
similarly10122RBsimilarly
situated10123VVNsituate
people10124NNSpeople
differently10125RBdifferently
.10126SENT.
But10127CCbut
to10128TOto
finish10129VVfinish
...10130:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10131LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
General10132NPGeneral
,10133,,
that10134WDTthat
...10135:...
that10136WDTthat
's10137VBZbe
an10138DTan
...10139:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10140LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...10141:...
my10142PP$my
answer10143NNanswer
to10144TOto
Justice10145NPJustice
...10146:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10147LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...10148:...
an10149DTan
impossible10150JJimpossible
idea10151NNidea
to10152TOto
...10153:...
to10154TOto
put10155VVput
into10156INinto
practice10157NNpractice
by10158INby
taking10159VVGtake
out10160RPout
the10161DTthe
sex10162NNsex
.10163SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10164LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
May10165NPmay
I10166PPI
just10167RBjust
continue10168VVPcontinue
with10169INwith
it10170PPit
?10171SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10172LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yes10173NPYes
,10174,,
Your10175PP$your
Honor10176NPHonor
.10177SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10178LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
The10179DTthe
hypothetical10180JJhypothetical
is10181VBZbe
not10182RBnot
a10183DTa
hypothetical10184JJhypothetical
.10185SENT.
Its10186PP$its
Sprogis10187NPSprogis
against10188INagainst
United10189NPUnited
Airlines10190NPSAirlines
.10191SENT.
And10192CCand
it10193PPit
was10194VBDbe
given10195VVNgive
,10196,,
and10197CCand
not10198RBnot
challenged10199VVNchallenge
,10200,,
that10201IN/thatthat
they10202PPthey
did10203VVDdo
n't10204RBn't
hire10205VVhire
men10206NNSman
as10207INas
cabin10208NNcabin
attendants10209NNSattendant
.10210SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10211LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right10212NPRight
.10213SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10214LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But10215CCbut
they10216PPthey
fired10217VVDfire
this10218DTthis
woman10219NNwoman
because10220INbecause
she10221PPshe
married10222VVDmarry
,10223,,
she10224PPshe
did10225VVDdo
n't10226RBn't
look10227VVlook
like10228INlike
Cheryl10229NPCheryl
"10230''"
Fly10231NPFly
Me10232NPMe
.10233SENT.
"10234''"
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10235LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right10236NPRight
.10237SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10238LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Once10239INonce
she10240PPshe
married10241VVDmarry
,10242,,
she10243PPshe
would10244MDwould
n't10245RBn't
be10246VBbe
attracted10247VVNattract
to10248TOto
the10249DTthe
male10250JJmale
passengers10251NNSpassenger
.10252SENT.
The10253DTthe
court10254NNcourt
of10255INof
appeals10256NNSappeal
said10257VVDsay
,10258,,
Title10259NPTitle
VII10260NPVII
was10261VBDbe
meant10262VVNmean
to10263TOto
strike10264VVstrike
out10265RPout
the10266DTthe
entire10267JJentire
spectrum10268NNspectrum
of10269INof
sex10270NNsex
stereotyping10271VVGstereotype
,10272,,
so10273RBso
if10274INif
this10275DTthis
woman10276NNwoman
was10277VBDbe
fired10278VVNfire
because10279INbecause
she10280PPshe
was10281VBDbe
n't10282RBn't
...10283:...
she10284PPshe
would10285MDwould
no10286RBno
longer10287RBRlonger
be10288VBbe
so10289RBso
attractive10290JJattractive
to10291TOto
men10292NNSman
if10293INif
she10294PPshe
is10295VBZbe
married10296JJmarried
,10297,,
that10298WDTthat
's10299VBZbe
sex10300NNsex
discrimination10301NNdiscrimination
.10302SENT.
And10303CCand
we10304PPwe
do10305VVPdo
n't10306RBn't
have10307VHhave
to10308TOto
have10309VHhave
a10310DTa
...10311:...
a10312DTa
...10313:...
a10314DTa
male10315NNmale
involved10316VVDinvolve
.10317SENT.
This10318DTthis
is10319VBZbe
a10320DTa
woman10321NNwoman
who10322WPwho
was10323VBDbe
treated10324VVNtreat
in10325INin
a10326DTa
very10327RBvery
stereotypical10328JJstereotypical
way10329NNway
.10330SENT.
She10331PPshe
is10332VBZbe
no10333RBno
longer10334RBRlonger
young10335JJyoung
and10336CCand
attractive10337JJattractive
when10338WRBwhen
she10339PPshe
married10340VVDmarry
.10341SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10342LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Your10343PP$your
Honor10344NPHonor
,10345,,
I10346PPI
...10347:...
I10348PPI
...10349:...
I10350PPI
do10351VVPdo
think10352VVthink
that10353IN/thatthat
the10354DTthe
question10355NNquestion
is10356VBZbe
always10357RBalways
,10358,,
are10359VBPbe
you10360PPyou
treating10361VVGtreat
similarly10362RBsimilarly
situated10363VVNsituate
men10364NNSman
and10365CCand
women10366NNSwoman
differently10367RBdifferently
.10368SENT.
There10369EXthere
are10370VBPbe
times10371NNStime
where10372WRBwhere
issues10373NNSissue
of10374INof
proof10375NNproof
are10376VBPbe
very10377RBvery
difficult10378JJdifficult
.10379SENT.
For10380INfor
example10381NNexample
,10382,,
in10383INin
the10384DTthe
Price10385NPPrice
Waterhouse10386NPWaterhouse
case10387NNcase
,10388,,
Ann10389NPAnn
Hopkins10390NPHopkins
was10391VBDbe
fired10392VVNfire
because10393INbecause
she10394PPshe
was10395VBDbe
aggressive10396JJaggressive
...10397:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10398LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But10399CCbut
this10400DTthis
was10401VBDbe
...10402:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10403LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...10404:...
because10405INbecause
she10406PPshe
was10407VBDbe
rude10408JJrude
to10409TOto
staff10410NNstaff
...10411:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10412LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...10413:...
this10414DTthis
was10415VBDbe
an10416DTan
actual10417JJactual
case10418NNcase
.10419SENT.
This10420DTthis
was10421VBDbe
an10422DTan
actual10423JJactual
case10424NNcase
and10425CCand
it10426PPit
was10427VBDbe
given10428VVNgive
that10429IN/thatthat
no10430DTno
males10431NNSmale
are10432VBPbe
hiring10433VVGhire
and10434CCand
no10435DTno
male10436NNmale
is10437VBZbe
complaining10438VVGcomplain
.10439SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10440LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
But10441CCbut
,10442,,
Your10443PP$your
Honor10444NPHonor
,10445,,
the10446DTthe
way10447NNway
that10448IN/thatthat
actual10449JJactual
case10450NNcase
was10451VBDbe
resolved10452VVNresolve
was10453VBDbe
because10454INbecause
the10455DTthe
woman10456NNwoman
had10457VHDhave
not10458RBnot
brought10459VVNbring
her10460PP$her
claim10461NNclaim
in10462INin
a10463DTa
timely10464JJtimely
fashion10465NNfashion
on10466INon
the10467DTthe
sex10468NNsex
discrimination10469NNdiscrimination
piece10470NNpiece
.10471SENT.
And10472CCand
so10473RBso
the10474DTthe
way10475NNway
this10476DTthis
Court10477NPCourt
resolved10478VVDresolve
that10479IN/thatthat
decision10480NNdecision
was10481VBDbe
it10482PPit
said10483VVDsay
,10484,,
all10485DTall
right10486NNright
...10487:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10488LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
The10489DTthe
...10490:...
no10491UHno
.10492SENT.
This10493DTthis
case10494NNcase
...10495:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10496LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...10497:...
she10498PPshe
is10499VBZbe
being10500VBGbe
treated10501VVNtreat
the10502DTthe
same10503JJsame
...10504:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10505LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...10506:...
never10507RBnever
came10508VVDcome
to10509TOto
this10510DTthis
case10511NNcase
,10512,,
never10513RBnever
came10514VVDcome
to10515TOto
this10516DTthis
Court10517NPCourt
.10518SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10519LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
So10520INso
I10521PPI
guess10522VVPguess
I10523PPI
'm10524VBPbe
thinking10525VVGthink
of10526INof
the10527DTthe
wrong10528JJwrong
case10529NNcase
.10530SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10531LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Sprogis10532NPSprogis
against10533INagainst
United10534NPUnited
Airlines10535NPSAirlines
,10536,,
Seventh10537NPSeventh
Circuit10538NPCircuit
.10539SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10540LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
General10541NPGeneral
,10542,,
could10543MDcould
I10544PPI
go10545VVgo
back10546RBback
to10547TOto
your10548PP$your
opening10549NNopening
statement10550NNstatement
and10551CCand
particularly10552RBparticularly
to10553TOto
the10554DTthe
second10555JJsecond
part10556NNpart
of10557INof
it10558PPit
?10559SENT?
You10560PPyou
talked10561VVDtalk
about10562INabout
the10563DTthe
history10564NNhistory
of10565INof
...10566:...
of10567INof
Title10568NPTitle
VII10569NPVII
and10570CCand
some10571DTsome
of10572INof
the10573DTthe
subsequent10574JJsubsequent
legislative10575JJlegislative
history10576NNhistory
,10577,,
and10578CCand
I10579PPI
guess10580VVPguess
what10581WPwhat
strikes10582VVZstrike
me10583PPme
,10584,,
and10585CCand
I10586PPI
was10587VBDbe
struck10588VVNstrike
in10589INin
reading10590VVGread
your10591PP$your
briefs10592NNSbrief
too10593RBtoo
,10594,,
is10595VBZbe
that10596IN/thatthat
the10597DTthe
arguments10598NNSargument
you10599PPyou
're10600VBPbe
making10601VVGmake
,10602,,
I10603PPI
would10604MDwould
say10605VVsay
,10606,,
are10607VBPbe
not10608RBnot
ones10609NNSone
we10610PPwe
typically10611RBtypically
would10612MDwould
accept10613VVaccept
.10614SENT.
For10615INfor
many10616JJmany
years10617NNSyear
,10618,,
the10619DTthe
lodestar10620NNlodestar
of10621INof
this10622DTthis
Court10623NPCourt
's10624POS's
statutory10625JJstatutory
interpretation10626NNinterpretation
has10627VHZhave
been10628VBNbe
the10629DTthe
text10630NNtext
of10631INof
a10632DTa
statute10633NNstatute
,10634,,
not10635RBnot
the10636DTthe
legislative10637JJlegislative
history10638NNhistory
,10639,,
and10640CCand
certainly10641RBcertainly
not10642RBnot
the10643DTthe
subsequent10644JJsubsequent
legislative10645JJlegislative
history10646NNhistory
.10647SENT.
And10648CCand
the10649DTthe
text10650NNtext
of10651INof
the10652DTthe
statute10653NNstatute
appears10654VVZappear
to10655TOto
be10656VBbe
pretty10657RBpretty
firmly10658RBfirmly
in10659INin
Ms10660NNMs
.10661SENT.
Karlan10662NPKarlan
's10663POS's
corner10664NNcorner
.10665SENT.
Did10666VVDdo
you10667PPyou
discriminate10668JJdiscriminate
against10669INagainst
somebody10670NNsomebody
,10671,,
against10672INagainst
her10673PP$her
client10674NNclient
,10675,,
because10676INbecause
of10677INof
sex10678NNsex
?10679SENT?
Yes10680UHyes
,10681,,
you10682PPyou
did10683VVDdo
.10684SENT.
Because10685INbecause
you10686PPyou
fired10687VVDfire
the10688DTthe
person10689NNperson
because10690INbecause
this10691DTthis
was10692VBDbe
a10693DTa
man10694NNman
who10695WPwho
loved10696VVDlove
other10697JJother
men10698NNSman
.10699SENT.
And10700CCand
part10701NNpart
of10702INof
that10703DTthat
...10704:...
and10705CCand
it10706PPit
only10707RBonly
has10708VHZhave
to10709TOto
be10710VBbe
part10711NNpart
,10712,,
we10713PPwe
've10714VHPhave
made10715VVNmake
very10716RBvery
clear10717VVclear
there10718EXthere
's10719VBZbe
no10720DTno
search10721NNsearch
for10722INfor
sole10723JJsole
cause10724NNcause
in10725INin
Title10726NPTitle
VII10727NPVII
...10728:...
part10729NNpart
of10730INof
that10731WDTthat
is10732VBZbe
you10733PPyou
fired10734VVDfire
the10735DTthe
person10736NNperson
because10737INbecause
he10738PPhe
was10739VBDbe
a10740DTa
man10741NNman
.10742SENT.
If10743INif
he10744PPhe
were10745VBDbe
a10746DTa
woman10747NNwoman
,10748,,
he10749PPhe
would10750MDwould
n't10751RBn't
have10752VHhave
been10753VBNbe
fired10754VVNfire
.10755SENT.
This10756DTthis
is10757VBZbe
the10758DTthe
usual10759JJusual
kind10760NNkind
of10761INof
way10762NNway
in10763INin
which10764WDTwhich
we10765PPwe
interpret10766VVPinterpret
statutes10767NNSstatute
now10768RBnow
.10769SENT.
We10770PPwe
look10771VVPlook
to10772TOto
laws10773NNSlaw
.10774SENT.
We10775PPwe
do10776VVPdo
n't10777RBn't
look10778VVlook
...10779:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10780LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right10781RBright
.10782SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10783LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...10784:...
to10785TOto
predictions10786NNSprediction
.10787SENT.
We10788PPwe
do10789VVPdo
n't10790RBn't
look10791VVlook
to10792TOto
desires10793NNSdesire
.10794SENT.
We10795PPwe
do10796VVPdo
n't10797RBn't
look10798VVlook
to10799TOto
wishes10800NNSwish
.10801SENT.
We10802PPwe
look10803VVPlook
to10804TOto
laws10805NNSlaw
.10806SENT.
Why10807WRBwhy
does10808VVZdo
n't10809RBn't
that10810WDTthat
mean10811VVPmean
your10812PP$your
argument10813NNargument
failed10814VVDfail
?10815SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10816LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Because10817INbecause
,10818,,
Your10819PP$your
Honor10820NPHonor
,10821,,
I10822PPI
think10823VVPthink
that10824IN/thatthat
what10825WPwhat
our10826PP$our
brief10827JJbrief
attempts10828NNSattempt
to10829TOto
do10830VVdo
,10831,,
at10832INat
least10833JJSleast
,10834,,
is10835VBZbe
make10836VVmake
a10837DTa
straightforward10838JJstraightforward
textual10839JJtextual
argument10840NNargument
.10841SENT.
The10842DTthe
law10843NNlaw
distinguishes10844VVZdistinguish
between10845INbetween
sex10846NNsex
and10847CCand
sexual10848JJsexual
orientation10849NNorientation
.10850SENT.
Those10851DTthose
are10852VBPbe
two10853CDtwo
different10854JJdifferent
traits10855NNStrait
.10856SENT.
And10857CCand
that10858DTthat
's10859VBZbe
precisely10860RBprecisely
why10861WRBwhy
when10862WRBwhen
Congress10863NPCongress
wants10864VVZwant
to10865TOto
prohibit10866VVprohibit
discrimination10867NNdiscrimination
based10868VVNbase
on10869INon
sexual10870JJsexual
orientation10871NNorientation
,10872,,
it10873PPit
does10874VVZdo
n't10875RBn't
define10876VVdefine
sex10877NNsex
as10878INas
including10879VVGinclude
sexual10880JJsexual
orientation10881NNorientation
.10882SENT.
It10883PPit
lists10884VVZlist
it10885PPit
as10886INas
a10887DTa
different10888JJdifferent
trait10889NNtrait
.10890SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10891LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
What10892WDTwhat
...10893:...
what10894WPwhat
is10895VBZbe
...10896:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10897LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
And10898CCand
so10899RBso
under10900INunder
Title10901NPTitle
...10902:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10903LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
What10904WPWhat
is10905VBZbe
your10906PP$your
response10907NNresponse
to10908TOto
the10909DTthe
two-comparator10910NNtwo-comparator
problem10911NNproblem
we10912PPwe
've10913VHPhave
been10914VBNbe
discussing10915VVGdiscuss
and10916CCand
the10917DTthe
fact10918NNfact
that10919IN/thatthat
at10920INat
least10921JJSleast
one10922CDone
contributing10923VVGcontribute
cause10924NNcause
appears10925VVZappear
to10926TOto
be10927VBbe
sex10928NNsex
?10929SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]10930LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Well10931UHWell
,10932,,
Your10933PP$your
Honor10934NPHonor
,10935,,
a10936DTa
couple10937NNcouple
of10938INof
responses10939NNSresponse
.10940SENT.
First10941RBfirst
,10942,,
I10943PPI
do10944VVPdo
n't10945RBn't
think10946VVthink
that10947IN/thatthat
one10948CDone
contributing10949JJcontributing
cause10950NNcause
is10951VBZbe
sex10952NNsex
.10953SENT.
I10954PPI
think10955VVPthink
that10956IN/thatthat
as10957RBas
long10958RBlong
as10959INas
you10960PPyou
're10961VBPbe
treating10962VVGtreat
gay10963JJgay
men10964NNSman
and10965CCand
women10966NNSwoman
exactly10967RBexactly
the10968DTthe
same10969JJsame
regardless10970RBregardless
of10971INof
their10972PP$their
sex10973NNsex
,10974,,
the10975DTthe
contributing10976VVGcontribute
cause10977NNcause
is10978VBZbe
sexual10979JJsexual
orientation10980NNorientation
,10981,,
not10982RBnot
sex10983NNsex
.10984SENT.
And10985CCand
,10986,,
two10987CDtwo
,10988,,
I10989PPI
think10990VVPthink
it10991PPit
reflects10992VVZreflect
the10993DTthe
fact10994NNfact
that10995IN/thatthat
sex10996NNsex
and10997CCand
sexual10998JJsexual
orientation10999NNorientation
are11000VBPbe
different11001JJdifferent
traits11002NNStrait
.11003SENT.
And11004CCand
if11005INif
you11006PPyou
do11007VVPdo
the11008DTthe
analysis11009NNanalysis
the11010DTthe
way11011NNway
my11012PP$my
friends11013NNSfriend
on11014INon
the11015DTthe
other11016JJother
side11017NNside
suggested11018VVDsuggest
,11019,,
you11020PPyou
've11021VHPhave
completely11022RBcompletely
eliminated11023VVNeliminate
the11024DTthe
distinction11025NNdistinction
between11026INbetween
two11027CDtwo
very11028RBvery
different11029JJdifferent
traits11030NNStrait
and11031CCand
you11032PPyou
've11033VHPhave
...11034:...
and11035CCand
you11036PPyou
've11037VHPhave
essentially11038RBessentially
rendered11039VVNrender
...11040:...
you11041PPyou
nullified11042VVDnullify
Congress11043NPCongress
's11044POS's
careful11045JJcareful
...11046:...
very11047RBvery
careful11048JJcareful
decisions11049NNSdecision
in11050INin
numerous11051JJnumerous
other11052JJother
statutes11053NNSstatute
to11054TOto
specifically11055RBspecifically
protect11056VVprotect
sexual11057JJsexual
orientation11058NNorientation
and11059CCand
gender11060NNgender
identities11061NNSidentity
,11062,,
we'll11063NNwe'll
...11064:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]11065LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Is11066VBZbe
there11067RBthere
...11068:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11069LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Is11070VBZbe
there11071RBthere
anything11072NNanything
...11073:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]11074LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...11075:...
get11076VVget
to11077TOto
in11078INin
the11079DTthe
next11080JJnext
case11081NNcase
.11082SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11083LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...11084:...
in11085INin
this11086DTthis
record11087NNrecord
showing11088VVGshow
that11089IN/thatthat
the11090DTthe
employers11091NNSemployer
would11092MDwould
not11093RBnot
employ11094VVemploy
lesbian11095JJlesbian
women11096NNSwoman
?11097SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]11098LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
You11099PPyou
know11100VVPknow
,11101,,
Your11102PP$your
Honor11103NPHonor
,11104,,
in11105INin
these11106DTthese
cases11107NNScase
,11108,,
and11109CCand
this11110DTthis
may11111MDmay
have11112VHhave
been11113VBNbe
a11114DTa
better11115JJRgood
question11116NNquestion
for11117INfor
my11118PP$my
colleague11119NNcolleague
,11120,,
but11121CCbut
I11122PPI
think11123VVPthink
in11124INin
these11125DTthese
cases11126NNScase
,11127,,
the11128DTthe
employers11129NNSemployer
have11130VHPhave
...11131:...
in11132INin
the11133DTthe
cases11134NNScase
...11135:...
the11136DTthe
sexual11137JJsexual
orientation11138NNorientation
cases11139NNScase
,11140,,
the11141DTthe
employers11142NNSemployer
have11143VHPhave
generally11144RBgenerally
denied11145VVNdeny
that11146IN/thatthat
they11147PPthey
discriminate11148VVPdiscriminate
based11149VVNbase
on11150INon
...11151:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11152LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But11153CCbut
all11154RBall
we11155PPwe
know11156VVPknow
on11157INon
...11158:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]11159LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...11160:...
their11161PP$their
sexual11162JJsexual
orientation11163NNorientation
.11164SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11165LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Did11166VVDdo
this11167DTthis
go11168NNgo
...11169:...
the11170DTthe
...11171:...
the11172DTthe
...11173:...
the11174DTthe
allegation11175NNallegation
is11176VBZbe
that11177IN/thatthat
the11178DTthe
person11179NNperson
was11180VBDbe
discharged11181VVNdischarge
when11182WRBwhen
he11183PPhe
announced11184VVDannounce
that11185IN/thatthat
he11186PPhe
was11187VBDbe
gay11188JJgay
.11189SENT.
There11190EXthere
's11191VBZbe
nothing11192NNnothing
in11193INin
the11194DTthe
record11195NNrecord
as11196RBas
far11197RBfar
as11198INas
I11199PPI
can11200MDcan
see11201VVsee
that11202IN/thatthat
there11203EXthere
was11204VBDbe
a11205DTa
policy11206NNpolicy
on11207INon
the11208DTthe
employer11209NNemployer
's11210POS's
part11211NNpart
of11212INof
discharging11213VVGdischarge
or11214CCor
not11215RBnot
...11216:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]11217LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right11218RBright
.11219SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11220LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...11221:...
discharging11222VVGdischarge
lesbian11223JJlesbian
women11224NNSwoman
.11225SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]11226LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
I11227PPI
think11228VVPthink
that11229WDTthat
's11230VBZbe
right11231JJright
.11232SENT.
I11233PPI
think11234VVPthink
basically11235RBbasically
the11236DTthe
employer11237NNemployer
's11238POS's
defenses11239NNSdefense
here11240RBhere
were11241VBDbe
,11242,,
one11243CDone
,11244,,
I11245PPI
did11246VVDdo
n't11247RBn't
fire11248VVfire
him11249PPhim
because11250INbecause
he11251PPhe
was11252VBDbe
gay11253JJgay
,11254,,
but11255CCbut
,11256,,
two11257CDtwo
,11258,,
if11259INif
you11260PPyou
think11261VVPthink
I11262PPI
did11263VVDdo
,11264,,
Title11265NPTitle
VII11266NPVII
does11267VVZdo
n't11268RBn't
prohibit11269VVprohibit
discrimination11270NNdiscrimination
based11271VVNbase
on11272INon
sexual11273JJsexual
orientation11274NNorientation
.11275SENT.
And11276CCand
if11277INif
I11278PPI
could11279MDcould
address11280VVaddress
lastly11281RBlastly
the11282DTthe
point11283NNpoint
that11284IN/thatthat
the11285DTthe
Chief11286NPChief
Justice11287NPJustice
and11288CCand
Justice11289NPJustice
Alito11290NPAlito
were11291VBDbe
raising11292VVGraise
about11293INabout
so-called11294JJso-called
legislative11295JJlegislative
updating11296VVGupdate
that11297IN/thatthat
Judge11298NPJudge
Posner11299NPPosner
suggested11300VVDsuggest
,11301,,
here11302RBhere
I11303PPI
think11304VVPthink
that11305IN/thatthat
a11306DTa
judicial11307JJjudicial
ruling11308NNruling
would11309MDwould
be11310VBbe
particularly11311RBparticularly
pernicious11312JJpernicious
because11313INbecause
when11314WRBwhen
Congress11315NPCongress
seeks11316VVZseek
to11317TOto
expand11318VVexpand
the11319DTthe
scope11320NNscope
of11321INof
Title11322NPTitle
VII11323NPVII
's11324POS's
liability11325NNliability
provisions11326NNSprovision
,11327,,
it11328PPit
typically11329RBtypically
couples11330VVZcouple
that11331IN/thatthat
itself11332PPitself
with11333INwith
an11334DTan
expansion11335NNexpansion
of11336INof
the11337DTthe
religious11338JJreligious
employers11339NNSemployer
exemption11340NNexemption
to11341TOto
Title11342NPTitle
VII11343NPVII
,11344,,
precisely11345RBprecisely
because11346INbecause
issues11347NNSissue
of11348INof
sexual11349JJsexual
orientation11350NNorientation
like11351INlike
issues11352NNSissue
of11353INof
gender11354NNgender
identity11355NNidentity
raise11356VVraise
different11357JJdifferent
issues11358NNSissue
from11359INfrom
a11360DTa
religious11361JJreligious
liberty11362NNliberty
perspective11363NNperspective
.11364SENT.
The11365DTthe
employee11366NNemployee
's11367POS's
position11368NNposition
here11369RBhere
would11370MDwould
only11371RBonly
do11372VVdo
half11373NNhalf
of11374INof
that11375DTthat
work11376NNwork
.11377SENT.
It11378PPit
would11379MDwould
expand11380VVexpand
the11381DTthe
scope11382NNscope
of11383INof
liability11384NNliability
without11385INwithout
giving11386VVGgive
any11387DTany
consideration11388NNconsideration
to11389TOto
those11390DTthose
religious11391JJreligious
liberty11392NNliberty
interests11393NNSinterest
on11394INon
the11395DTthe
other11396JJother
side11397NNside
of11398INof
the11399DTthe
balance11400NNbalance
,11401,,
and11402CCand
that11403DTthat
is11404VBZbe
precisely11405RBprecisely
why11406WRBwhy
this11407DTthis
is11408VBZbe
the11409DTthe
type11410NNtype
of11411INof
issue11412NNissue
that11413WDTthat
is11414VBZbe
better11415RBRwell
left11416VVNleave
to11417TOto
Congress11418NPCongress
than11419INthan
the11420DTthe
courts11421NNScourt
.11422SENT.
Justice11423NPJustice
Gorsuch11424NPGorsuch
,11425,,
I11426PPI
want11427VVPwant
to11428TOto
make11429VVmake
sure11430JJsure
that11431IN/thatthat
I11432PPI
fully11433RBfully
addressed11434VVDaddress
your11435PP$your
...11436:...
your11437PP$your
textual11438JJtextual
considerations11439NNSconsideration
,11440,,
though11441RBthough
,11442,,
because11443INbecause
I11444PPI
really11445RBreally
do11446VVPdo
think11447VVPthink
it11448PPit
boils11449VVZboil
down11450RPdown
to11451TOto
the11452DTthe
fact11453NNfact
that11454IN/thatthat
sex11455NNsex
and11456CCand
sexual11457JJsexual
orientation11458NNorientation
are11459VBPbe
different11460JJdifferent
traits11461NNStrait
.11462SENT.
May11463MDmay
I11464PPI
finish11465VVfinish
my11466PP$my
answer11467NNanswer
?11468SENT?
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11469LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Sure11470NPSure
.11471SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]11472LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Title11473NPTitle
VII11474NPVII
prohibits11475VVZprohibit
discrimination11476NNdiscrimination
based11477VVNbase
on11478INon
one11479CDone
of11480INof
those11481DTthose
traits11482NNStrait
,11483,,
as11484RBas
long11485RBlong
as11486INas
you11487PPyou
treat11488VVPtreat
men11489NNSman
and11490CCand
women11491NNSwoman
who11492WPwho
are11493VBPbe
similarly11494RBsimilarly
situated11495VVNsituate
with11496INwith
respect11497NNrespect
to11498TOto
the11499DTthe
other11500JJother
trait11501NNtrait
exactly11502RBexactly
the11503DTthe
same11504JJsame
,11505,,
you11506PPyou
're11507VBPbe
not11508RBnot
"11509``"
discriminating11510VVGdiscriminate
"11511''"
under11512INunder
...11513:...
within11514INwithin
the11515DTthe
meaning11516NNmeaning
of11517INof
Title11518NPTitle
VII11519NPVII
.11520SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11521LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank11522VVthank
you11523PPyou
,11524,,
counsel11525NNcounsel
.11526SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]11527LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Thank11528VVthank
you11529PPyou
.11530SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11531LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Five11532CDFive
minutes11533NNSminute
,11534,,
Ms11535NNMs
.11536SENT.
Karlan11537NPKarlan
.11538SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]11539LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Thank11540VVthank
you11541PPyou
.11542SENT.
Let11543VVlet
me11544PPme
start11545VVstart
with11546INwith
the11547DTthe
question11548NNquestion
that11549IN/thatthat
Justice11550NPJustice
Ginsburg11551NPGinsburg
asked11552VVDask
because11553INbecause
I11554PPI
think11555VVPthink
it11556PPit
's11557VBZbe
illustrative11558JJillustrative
of11559INof
contemporary11560JJcontemporary
sexual11561JJsexual
orientation11562NNorientation
discrimination11563NNdiscrimination
cases11564NNScase
.11565SENT.
Virtually11566RBvirtually
none11567NNnone
of11568INof
them11569PPthem
involve11570VVPinvolve
an11571DTan
employer11572NNemployer
,11573,,
and11574CCand
neither11575RBneither
of11576INof
the11577DTthe
cases11578NNScase
before11579INbefore
you11580PPyou
does11581VVZdo
,11582,,
who11583WPwho
claims11584VVZclaim
to11585TOto
have11586VHhave
an11587DTan
across-the-board11588JJacross-the-board
policy11589NNpolicy
of11590INof
firing11591NNfiring
both11592CCboth
all11593DTall
gay11594JJgay
men11595NNSman
and11596CCand
all11597DTall
lesbians11598NNSlesbian
.11599SENT.
What11600WPWhat
tends11601VVZtend
to11602TOto
happen11603VVhappen
,11604,,
and11605CCand
this11606DTthis
case11607NNcase
is11608VBZbe
illustrative11609JJillustrative
of11610INof
this11611DTthis
,11612,,
is11613VBZbe
a11614DTa
man11615NNman
who11616WPwho
also11617RBalso
does11618VVZdo
n't11619RBn't
conform11620VVconform
with11621INwith
some11622DTsome
other11623JJother
gender-based11624JJgender-based
stereotypes11625NNSstereotype
and11626CCand
who11627WPwho
is11628VBZbe
gay11629JJgay
gets11630VVZget
fired11631VVNfire
,11632,,
which11633WDTwhich
puts11634VVZput
them11635PPthem
in11636INin
exactly11637RBexactly
the11638DTthe
position11639NNposition
that11640IN/thatthat
Justice11641NPJustice
Sotomayor11642NPSotomayor
mentioned11643VVDmention
,11644,,
which11645WDTwhich
is11646VBZbe
really11647RBreally
devilishly11648RBdevilishly
hard11649JJhard
to11650TOto
figure11651VVfigure
out11652RPout
what11653WPwhat
's11654VBZbe
going11655VVGgo
on11656INon
here11657RBhere
.11658SENT.
The11659DTthe
second11660JJsecond
point11661NNpoint
I11662PPI
just11663RBjust
want11664VVPwant
to11665TOto
leave11666VVleave
the11667DTthe
Court11668NNcourt
with11669INwith
is11670VBZbe
,11671,,
the11672DTthe
entire11673JJentire
argument11674NNargument
on11675INon
the11676DTthe
other11677JJother
side11678NNside
depends11679VVZdepend
on11680INon
the11681DTthe
idea11682NNidea
that11683IN/thatthat
men11684NNSman
who11685WPwho
are11686VBPbe
gay11687JJgay
and11688CCand
women11689NNSwoman
who11690WPwho
are11691VBPbe
lesbians11692NNSlesbian
are11693VBPbe
being11694VBGbe
treated11695VVNtreat
the11696DTthe
same11697JJsame
.11698SENT.
And11699CCand
that11700DTthat
's11701VBZbe
just11702RBjust
not11703RBnot
so11704RBso
.11705SENT.
Because11706INbecause
if11707INif
you11708PPyou
look11709VVPlook
at11710INat
what11711WPwhat
actually11712RBactually
causes11713VVZcause
the11714DTthe
problem11715NNproblem
,11716,,
it11717PPit
's11718VBZbe
the11719DTthe
man11720NNman
who11721WPwho
says11722VVZsay
,11723,,
I11724PPI
married11725VVDmarry
my11726PP$my
partner11727NNpartner
,11728,,
Bill11729NPBill
.11730SENT.
If11731INif
any11732DTany
woman11733NNwoman
who11734WPwho
worked11735VVDwork
there11736EXthere
had11737VHDhave
married11738VVNmarry
Bill11739NPBill
,11740,,
he11741PPhe
would11742MDwould
n't11743RBn't
...11744:...
she11745PPshe
would11746MDwould
not11747RBnot
have11748VHhave
been11749VBNbe
fired11750VVNfire
.11751SENT.
And11752CCand
he11753PPhe
is11754VBZbe
.11755SENT.
And11756CCand
you11757PPyou
have11758VHPhave
to11759TOto
look11760VVlook
,11761,,
because11762INbecause
the11763DTthe
textual11764JJtextual
language11765NNlanguage
tells11766VVZtell
you11767PPyou
to11768TOto
,11769,,
at11770INat
such11771JJsuch
individual11772JJindividual
and11773CCand
not11774RBnot
at11775INat
the11776DTthe
overall11777JJoverall
class11778NNclass
.11779SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]11780LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Ms11781NNMs
.11782SENT.
Karlan11783NPKarlan
,11784,,
would11785MDwould
you11786PPyou
address11787VVaddress
these11788DTthese
...11789:...
General11790NPGeneral
's11791POS's
statement11792NNstatement
at11793INat
the11794DTthe
end11795NNend
?11796SENT?
He11797PPhe
...11798:...
he11799PPhe
goes11800VVZgo
back11801RBback
to11802TOto
the11803DTthe
comparator11804NNcomparator
should11805MDshould
be11806VBbe
a11807DTa
woman11808NNwoman
who11809WPwho
...11810:...
a11811DTa
...11812:...
a11813DTa
man11814NNman
who11815WPwho
likes11816VVZlike
a11817DTa
man11818NNman
and11819CCand
a11820DTa
woman11821NNwoman
who11822WPwho
likes11823VVZlike
a11824DTa
woman11825NNwoman
.11826SENT.
You11827PPyou
're11828VBPbe
trying11829VVGtry
to11830TOto
get11831VVget
to11832TOto
that11833DTthat
.11834SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]11835LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Yes11836NPYes
.11837SENT.
I11838PPI
think11839VVPthink
he11840PPhe
...11841:...
he11842PPhe
is11843VBZbe
varying11844VVGvary
two11845CDtwo
things11846NNSthing
there11847RBthere
.11848SENT.
One11849CDOne
,11850,,
he11851PPhe
is11852VBZbe
varying11853VVGvary
the11854DTthe
sex11855NNsex
of11856INof
the11857DTthe
employee11858NNemployee
and11859CCand
,11860,,
second11861RBsecond
,11862,,
he11863PPhe
's11864VBZbe
varying11865VVGvary
the11866DTthe
sex11867NNsex
of11868INof
the11869DTthe
person11870NNperson
to11871TOto
whom11872WPwhom
the11873DTthe
employee11874NNemployee
is11875VBZbe
interested11876JJinterested
.11877SENT.
And11878CCand
if11879INif
two11880CDtwo
things11881NNSthing
that11882RBthat
...11883:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]11884LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So11885CCso
give11886VVgive
us11887PPus
an11888DTan
example11889NNexample
from11890INfrom
a11891DTa
case11892NNcase
how11893WRBhow
you11894PPyou
can11895MDcan
't11896RB't
do11897VVPdo
that11898DTthat
.11899SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]11900LOC[MS. KARLAN]
I11901PPI
'm11902VBPbe
not11903RBnot
sure11904JJsure
...11905:...
of11906INof
course11907NNcourse
you11908PPyou
can11909MDcan
do11910VVdo
it11911PPit
but11912CCbut
you11913PPyou
do11914VVPdo
n't11915RBn't
have11916VHhave
to11917TOto
.11918SENT.
Because11919INbecause
all11920DTall
you11921PPyou
need11922VVPneed
to11923TOto
do11924VVdo
is11925VBZbe
show11926VVshow
that11927DTthat
sex11928NNsex
played11929VVDplay
a11930DTa
role11931NNrole
here11932RBhere
.11933SENT.
And11934CCand
if11935INif
the11936DTthe
answer11937NNanswer
is11938VBZbe
if11939INif
a11940DTa
man11941NNman
had11942VHDhave
...11943:...
if11944INif
a11945DTa
woman11946NNwoman
had11947VHDhave
come11948VVNcome
in11949RPin
and11950CCand
said11951VVDsay
,11952,,
I11953PPI
like11954VVPlike
to11955TOto
date11956VVdate
men11957NNSman
,11958,,
you11959PPyou
would11960MDwould
n't11961RBn't
have11962VHhave
fired11963VVNfire
her11964PPher
,11965,,
and11966CCand
when11967WRBwhen
a11968DTa
man11969NNman
says11970VVZsay
,11971,,
I11972PPI
like11973VVPlike
to11974TOto
date11975VVdate
men11976NNSman
,11977,,
you11978PPyou
did11979VVDdo
,11980,,
that11981WDTthat
's11982VBZbe
enough11983JJenough
to11984TOto
show11985VVshow
sex11986NNsex
discrimination11987NNdiscrimination
.11988SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]11989LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But11990CCbut
what11991WPwhat
if11992INif
the11993DTthe
decisionmaker11994NNdecisionmaker
makes11995VVZmake
a11996DTa
decision11997NNdecision
based11998VVNbase
on11999INon
sexual12000JJsexual
orientation12001NNorientation
but12002CCbut
does12003VVZdo
not12004RBnot
know12005VVknow
the12006DTthe
biological12007JJbiological
sex12008NNsex
of12009INof
the12010DTthe
person12011NNperson
involved12012VVDinvolve
?12013SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]12014LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Well12015UHwell
,12016,,
there12017EXthere
is12018VBZbe
no12019DTno
reported12020JJreported
case12021NNcase
that12022WDTthat
does12023VVZdo
that12024DTthat
.12025SENT.
And12026CCand
I12027PPI
...12028:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]12029LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
All12030DTall
right12031NNright
.12032SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]12033LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...12034:...
think12035VVPthink
the12036DTthe
Court12037NPCourt
...12038:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]12039LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But12040CCbut
what12041WPwhat
if12042INif
...12043:...
[MS. KARLAN]12044LOC[MS. KARLAN]
...12045:...
can12046MDcan
wrestle12047VVwrestle
with12048INwith
...12049:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]12050LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
What12051WPWhat
if12052INif
it12053PPit
happened12054VVDhappen
?12055SENT?
We12056PPwe
have12057VHPhave
had12058VHDhave
a12059DTa
lot12060NNlot
of12061INof
hypotheticals12062NNShypotheticals
of12063INof
things12064NNSthing
that12065WDTthat
may12066MDmay
or12067CCor
may12068MDmay
not12069RBnot
have12070VHhave
happened12071VVNhappen
.12072SENT.
What12073WPWhat
if12074INif
that12075DTthat
happens12076VVZhappen
?12077SENT?
Is12078VBZbe
that12079DTthat
discrimination12080NNdiscrimination
on12081INon
the12082DTthe
basis12083NNbasis
of12084INof
sex12085NNsex
where12086WRBwhere
the12087DTthe
decisionmaker12088NNdecisionmaker
does12089VVZdo
n't12090RBn't
even12091RBeven
know12092VVknow
the12093DTthe
person12094NNperson
's12095POS's
sex12096NNsex
?12097SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]12098LOC[MS. KARLAN]
And12099CCand
...12100:...
and12101CCand
how12102WRBhow
do12103VVPdo
they12104PPthey
know12105VVPknow
the12106DTthe
person12107NNperson
's12108POS's
sexual12109JJsexual
orientation12110NNorientation
?12111SENT?
[JUSTICE ALITO]12112LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Because12113INbecause
somebody12114NNsomebody
who12115WPwho
interviewed12116VVDinterview
the12117DTthe
candidates12118NNScandidate
tells12119VVZtell
them12120PPthem
that12121DTthat
.12122SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]12123LOC[MS. KARLAN]
And12124CCand
they12125PPthey
are12126VBPbe
unable12127JJunable
to12128TOto
tell12129VVtell
anything12130NNanything
about12131INabout
the12132DTthe
person12133NNperson
's12134POS's
sex12135NNsex
?12136SENT?
[JUSTICE ALITO]12137LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
No12138NPNo
.12139SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]12140LOC[MS. KARLAN]
So12141INso
this12142DTthis
is12143VBZbe
Saturday12144NPSaturday
Night12145NPNight
Live12146NPLive
Pat12147NPPat
,12148,,
as12149RBas
...12150:...
as12151INas
an12152DTan
example12153NNexample
,12154,,
right12155RBright
?12156SENT?
[12157SYM[
LAUGHTER12158NNlaughter
]12159SYM]
[JUSTICE ALITO]12160LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well12161UHwell
,12162,,
I12163PPI
'm12164VBPbe
not12165RBnot
familiar12166JJfamiliar
with12167INwith
that12168DTthat
.12169SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]12170LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Okay12171NPOkay
.12172SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]12173LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But12174CCbut
...12175:...
[MS. KARLAN]12176LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Which12177WDTwhich
is12178VBZbe
the12179DTthe
person12180NNperson
named12181VVNname
Pat12182NPPat
,12183,,
and12184CCand
you12185PPyou
can12186MDcan
never12187RBnever
tell12188VVtell
whether12189INwhether
Pat12190NPPat
is12191VBZbe
a12192DTa
man12193NNman
or12194CCor
a12195DTa
woman12196NNwoman
.12197SENT.
I12198PPI
mean12199VVPmean
,12200,,
theoretically12201RBtheoretically
that12202DTthat
person12203NNperson
might12204MDmight
be12205VBbe
out12206RBout
there12207RBthere
.12208SENT.
But12209CCbut
here12210RBhere
is12211VBZbe
the12212DTthe
key12213JJkey
...12214:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]12215LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Theoretically12216RBtheoretically
what12217WPwhat
?12218SENT?
[MS. KARLAN]12219LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Theoretically12220RBtheoretically
that12221IN/thatthat
person12222NNperson
might12223MDmight
be12224VBbe
out12225RBout
there12226RBthere
.12227SENT.
But12228CCbut
here12229RBhere
is12230VBZbe
the12231DTthe
key12232NNkey
:12233::
The12234DTthe
...12235:...
the12236DTthe
cases12237NNScase
that12238WDTthat
are12239VBPbe
brought12240VVNbring
are12241VBPbe
almost12242RBalmost
all12243RBall
brought12244VVNbring
by12245INby
somebody12246NNsomebody
who12247WPwho
says12248VVZsay
my12249PP$my
employer12250NNemployer
knew12251VVDknow
who12252WPwho
I12253PPI
was12254VBDbe
and12255CCand
fired12256VVNfire
me12257PPme
because12258INbecause
I12259PPI
was12260VBDbe
a12261DTa
man12262NNman
or12263CCor
fired12264VVDfire
me12265PPme
because12266INbecause
I12267PPI
was12268VBDbe
a12269DTa
woman12270NNwoman
.12271SENT.
Somebody12272NNsomebody
who12273WPwho
comes12274VVZcome
in12275INin
and12276CCand
says12277VVZsay
I12278PPI
'm12279VBPbe
not12280RBnot
going12281VVGgo
to12282TOto
tell12283VVtell
you12284PPyou
what12285WPwhat
my12286PP$my
sex12287NNsex
is12288VBZbe
,12289,,
but12290CCbut
,12291,,
believe12292VVPbelieve
me12293PPme
,12294,,
I12295PPI
was12296VBDbe
fired12297VVNfire
for12298INfor
my12299PP$my
sexual12300JJsexual
orientation12301NNorientation
,12302,,
that12303DTthat
person12304NNperson
will12305MDwill
lose12306VVlose
.12307SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]12308LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well12309UHWell
,12310,,
if12311INif
that12312WDTthat
's12313VBZbe
the12314DTthe
case12315NNcase
,12316,,
then12317RBthen
I12318PPI
think12319VVPthink
your12320PP$your
whole12321JJwhole
argument12322NNargument
collapses12323NNScollapse
because12324INbecause
sexual12325JJsexual
orientation12326NNorientation
then12327RBthen
is12328VBZbe
a12329DTa
different12330JJdifferent
thing12331NNthing
from12332INfrom
sex12333NNsex
.12334SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]12335LOC[MS. KARLAN]
Of12336INof
course12337NNcourse
it12338PPit
is12339VBZbe
.12340SENT.
No12341DTno
one12342CDone
has12343VHZhave
claimed12344VVNclaim
that12345DTthat
sexual12346JJsexual
orientation12347NNorientation
is12348VBZbe
the12349DTthe
same12350JJsame
thing12351NNthing
as12352INas
sex12353NNsex
.12354SENT.
What12355WPWhat
we12356PPwe
are12357VBPbe
saying12358VVGsay
is12359VBZbe
when12360WRBwhen
somebody12361NNsomebody
is12362VBZbe
fired12363VVNfire
...12364:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]12365LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well12366UHwell
,12367,,
let12368VVlet
me12369PPme
amend12370VVamend
it12371PPit
.12372SENT.
Your12373PP$your
argument12374NNargument
is12375VBZbe
that12376DTthat
sex12377NNsex
...12378:...
discrimination12379NNdiscrimination
based12380VVNbase
on12381INon
sexual12382JJsexual
orientation12383NNorientation
necessarily12384RBnecessarily
entails12385VVZentail
discrimination12386NNdiscrimination
based12387VVNbase
on12388INon
sex12389NNsex
.12390SENT.
But12391CCbut
if12392INif
it12393PPit
's12394VBZbe
the12395DTthe
case12396NNcase
that12397IN/thatthat
there12398EXthere
would12399MDwould
be12400VBbe
no12401DTno
liability12402NNliability
in12403INin
the12404DTthe
situation12405NNsituation
where12406WRBwhere
the12407DTthe
decisionmaker12408NNdecisionmaker
has12409VHZhave
no12410DTno
knowledge12411NNknowledge
of12412INof
sex12413NNsex
,12414,,
then12415RBthen
that12416DTthat
can12417MDcan
't12418RB't
possibly12419RBpossibly
be12420VBbe
true12421JJtrue
.12422SENT.
[MS. KARLAN]12423LOC[MS. KARLAN]
If12424INif
there12425EXthere
was12426VBDbe
that12427DTthat
case12428NNcase
,12429,,
it12430PPit
might12431MDmight
be12432VBbe
the12433DTthe
rare12434JJrare
case12435NNcase
in12436INin
which12437WDTwhich
sexual12438JJsexual
orientation12439NNorientation
discrimination12440NNdiscrimination
is12441VBZbe
not12442RBnot
a12443DTa
subset12444NNsubset
of12445INof
sex12446NNsex
.12447SENT.
But12448CCbut
in12449INin
the12450DTthe
case12451NNcase
where12452WRBwhere
the12453DTthe
person12454NNperson
knows12455VVZknow
the12456DTthe
sex12457NNsex
of12458INof
the12459DTthe
person12460NNperson
that12461IN/thatthat
they12462PPthey
're12463VBPbe
firing12464VVGfire
or12465CCor
refusing12466VVGrefuse
to12467TOto
hire12468VVhire
,12469,,
and12470CCand
knows12471VVZknow
the12472DTthe
sex12473NNsex
of12474INof
the12475DTthe
people12476NNSpeople
to12477TOto
whom12478WPwhom
that12479DTthat
person12480NNperson
is12481VBZbe
attracted12482VVNattract
,12483,,
that12484WDTthat
is12485VBZbe
sex12486NNsex
discrimination12487NNdiscrimination
,12488,,
pure12489JJpure
and12490CCand
simple12491JJsimple
.12492SENT.
And12493CCand
it12494PPit
's12495VBZbe
important12496JJimportant
to12497TOto
understand12498VVunderstand
that12499DTthat
...12500:...
and12501CCand
...12502:...
and12503CCand
this12504DTthis
goes12505VVZgo
back12506RBback
to12507TOto
something12508NNsomething
that12509IN/thatthat
Justice12510NPJustice
Ginsburg12511NPGinsburg
asked12512VVDask
during12513INduring
the12514DTthe
opening12515NNopening
argument12516NNargument
,12517,,
that12518DTthat
discrimination12519NNdiscrimination
against12520INagainst
gay12521JJgay
men12522NNSman
and12523CCand
discrimination12524NNdiscrimination
against12525INagainst
lesbians12526NNSlesbian
is12527VBZbe
not12528RBnot
one12529CDone
thing12530NNthing
.12531SENT.
And12532CCand
in12533INin
196412534CD@card@
,12535,,
if12536INif
you12537PPyou
look12538VVPlook
at12539INat
the12540DTthe
members12541NNSmember
of12542INof
Congress12543NPCongress
's12544POS's
brief12545NNbrief
,12546,,
they12547PPthey
will12548MDwill
tell12549VVtell
you12550PPyou
if12551INif
you12552PPyou
looked12553VVDlook
in12554INin
the12555DTthe
dictionary12556NNdictionary
there12557EXthere
was12558VBDbe
no12559DTno
phrase12560NNphrase
"12561``"
sexual12562JJsexual
orientation12563NNorientation
.12564SENT.
"12565``"
That12566DTthat
is12567VBZbe
a12568DTa
modern12569JJmodern
way12570NNway
of12571INof
combining12572VVGcombine
two12573CDtwo
kinds12574NNSkind
of12575INof
discrimination12576NNdiscrimination
:12577::
Discrimination12578NNdiscrimination
against12579INagainst
gay12580JJgay
men12581NNSman
,12582,,
which12583WDTwhich
goes12584VVZgo
back12585RBback
to12586TOto
Leviticus12587NPLeviticus
and12588CCand
the12589DTthe
common12590JJcommon
law12591NNlaw
,12592,,
and12593CCand
discrimination12594NNdiscrimination
against12595INagainst
lesbians12596NNSlesbian
,12597,,
which12598WDTwhich
was12599VBDbe
not12600RBnot
part12601NNpart
of12602INof
Leviticus12603NPLeviticus
and12604CCand
was12605VBDbe
not12606RBnot
part12607NNpart
of12608INof
the12609DTthe
common12610JJcommon
law12611NNlaw
.12612SENT.
Indeed12613RBindeed
,12614,,
in12615INin
196412616CD@card@
,12617,,
there12618EXthere
were12619VBDbe
only12620RBonly
1612621CD@card@
states12622NNSstate
in12623INin
the12624DTthe
United12625NPUnited
States12626NPStates
that12627IN/thatthat
clearly12628RBclearly
forbid12629VVNforbid
some12630DTsome
act12631NNact
in12632INin
which12633WDTwhich
lesbians12634NNSlesbian
could12635MDcould
engage12636VVengage
.12637SENT.
So12638INso
the12639DTthe
idea12640NNidea
that12641IN/thatthat
this12642DTthis
is12643VBZbe
one12644CDone
large12645JJlarge
idea12646NNidea
about12647INabout
sexual12648JJsexual
orientation12649NNorientation
discrimination12650NNdiscrimination
in12651INin
the12652DTthe
abstract12653JJabstract
,12654,,
without12655INwithout
reference12656NNreference
to12657TOto
sex12658NNsex
,12659,,
simply12660RBsimply
burkes12661VVZburke
the12662DTthe
history12663NNhistory
and12664CCand
burkes12665VVZburke
the12666DTthe
understanding12667NNunderstanding
.12668SENT.
And12669CCand
if12670INif
you12671PPyou
look12672VVPlook
at12673INat
the12674DTthe
harassment12675NNharassment
cases12676NNScase
,12677,,
you12678PPyou
will12679MDwill
see12680VVsee
why12681WRBwhy
this12682DTthis
is12683VBZbe
true12684JJtrue
.12685SENT.
Gay12686JJgay
men12687NNSman
are12688VBPbe
harassed12689VVNharass
in12690INin
a12691DTa
different12692JJdifferent
way12693NNway
than12694INthan
lesbians12695NNSlesbian
.12696SENT.
Thank12697VVthank
you12698PPyou
.12699SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12700LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank12701VVthank
you12702PPyou
,12703,,
counsel12704NNcounsel
.12705SENT.
The12706DTthe
case12707NNcase
is12708VBZbe
submitted12709VVNsubmit
.12710SENT.