<s> /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/ptreetagger/DepartmentOfCommerce.xml-src.tt /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/treetagger/DepartmentOfCommerce.xml-out.tt pos tagset built from model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par en lemma of the model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par - [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We2PPwe 'll3MDwill hear4VVhear argument5NNargument this6DTthis morning7NNmorning in8INin Case9NPCase 18-96610CD@card@ ,11,, the12DTthe Department13NPDepartment of14INof Commerce15NPCommerce versus16CCversus New17NPNew York18NPYork .19SENT. General20NPGeneral Francisco21NPFrancisco .22SENT.

[GENERAL FRANCISCO]23LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Mr24NPMr .25SENT. Chief26NPChief Justice27NPJustice ,28,, and29CCand may30MDmay it31PPit please32VVplease the33DTthe Court34NPCourt :35:: In36INin March37NPMarch 201838CD@card@ ,39,, Secretary40NPSecretary Ross41NPRoss reinstated42VVDreinstate a43DTa citizenship44NNcitizenship question45NNquestion that46WDTthat has47VHZhave been48VBNbe asked49VVNask as50INas part51NNpart of52INof the53DTthe census54NNcensus in55INin one56CDone form57NNform or58CCor another59DTanother for60INfor nearly61RBnearly 20062CD@card@ years63NNSyear .64SENT. The65DTthe district66NNdistrict court67NNcourt 's68POS's invalidation69NNinvalidation ...70:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]71LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I72PPI 'm73VBPbe sorry74JJsorry .75SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]76LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...77:... of78INof that79DTthat decision80NNdecision was81VBDbe wrong82JJwrong for83INfor ...84:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]85LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I86PPI 'm87VBPbe sorry88JJsorry ,89,, it90PPit 's91VHZhave not92RBnot been93VBNbe a94DTa part95NNpart of96INof the97DTthe survey98NNsurvey ,99,, which100WDTwhich is101VBZbe where102WRBwhere he103PPhe reinstated104VVDreinstate it105PPit ,106,, since107INsince 1950108CD@card@ .109SENT. And110CCand for111INfor 65112CD@card@ years113NNSyear ,114,, every115DTevery Secretary116NPSecretary of117INof the118DTthe Department119NPDepartment of120INof Commerce121NPCommerce ,122,, every123DTevery statistician124NNstatistician ,125,, including126VVGinclude this127DTthis Secretary128NPSecretary 's129POS's statistician130NNstatistician ,131,, recommended132VVNrecommend against133INagainst adding134VVGadd the135DTthe question136NNquestion .137SENT. So138RBso it139PPit may140MDmay be141VBbe that142DTthat 200143CD@card@ years144NNSyear of145INof asking146VVGask a147DTa citizenship148NNcitizenship question149NNquestion in150INin other151JJother forms152NNSform may153MDmay be154VBbe true155JJtrue ,156,, but157CCbut not158RBnot on159INon the160DTthe short161JJshort survey162NNsurvey .163SENT. That164DTthat 's165VBZbe what166WPwhat 's167VBZbe at168INat issue169NNissue here170RBhere .171SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]172LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Well173UHWell ,174,, but175RBbut ,176,, Your177PP$your Honor178NPHonor ,179,, it180PPit has181VHZhave been182VBNbe part183NNpart of184INof the185DTthe census186NNcensus for187INfor the188DTthe better189JJRgood part190NNpart of191INof 200192CD@card@ years193NNSyear ,194,, initially195RBinitially as196INas part197NNpart of198INof the199DTthe overall200JJoverall census201NNcensus itself202PPitself ...203:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]204LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But205CCbut do206VVPdo n't207RBn't we208PPwe put209VVDput ...210:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]211LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...212:... that213WDTthat went214VVDgo to215TOto all216DTall individuals217NNSindividual .218SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]219LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...220:... do221VVPdo n't222RBn't we223PPwe ask224VVPask the225DTthe question226NNquestion in227INin context228NNcontext ?229SENT? And230CCand for231INfor 65-odd-plus232JJ65-odd-plus years233NNSyear ,234,, everybody235NNeverybody said236VVDsay do237VVdo n't238RBn't add239VVadd it240PPit ?241SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]242LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] No243NPNo ,244,, Your245PP$your Honor246NPHonor ,247,, because248RBbecause ,249,, in250INin fact251NNfact ,252,, it253PPit was254VBDbe included255VVNinclude in256INin the257DTthe long-form258NNlong-form census259NNcensus until260INuntil the261DTthe year262NNyear 2000263CD@card@ .264SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]265LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That266DTthat is267VBZbe a268DTa different269JJdifferent ...270:... that271WDTthat 's272VBZbe the273DTthe whole274JJwhole issue275NNissue .276SENT. It277PPit could278MDcould have279VHhave been280VBNbe ...281:... it282PPit 's283VBZbe still284RBstill included285VVNinclude ...286:... or287CCor it288PPit could289MDcould have290VHhave been291VBNbe included292VVNinclude in293INin the294DTthe ACS295NPACS form296NNform ,297,, which298WDTwhich is299VBZbe still300RBstill being301VBGbe done302VVNdo .303SENT. And304CCand that305DTthat 's306VBZbe being307VBGbe done308VVNdo every309DTevery first310JJfirst ,311,, third312JJthird ,313,, and314CCand fifth315JJfifth year316NNyear .317SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]318LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yes319NPYes ,320,, Your321PP$your Honor322NPHonor ,323,, but324CCbut it325PPit has326VHZhave been327VBNbe part328NNpart of329INof the330DTthe census331NNcensus in332INin one333CDone form334NNform or335CCor another336DTanother for337INfor a338DTa very339RBvery long340JJlong period341NNperiod of342INof time343NNtime .344SENT. It345PPit has346VHZhave a347DTa long348JJlong pedigree349NNpedigree .350SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]351LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So352INso the353DTthe question354NNquestion now355RBnow before356INbefore us357PPus is358VBZbe ...359:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]360LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] The361DTthe question362NNquestion ,363,, therefore364RBtherefore ,365,, is366VBZbe two367CDtwo things368NNSthing .369SENT. First370RBfirst ,371,, we372PPwe think373VVPthink that374IN/thatthat the375DTthe Respondents376NNSrespondent '377POS' claims378NNSclaim are379VBPbe not380RBnot justiciable381JJjusticiable because382INbecause their383PP$their injuries384NNSinjury are385VBPbe n't386RBn't fairly387RBfairly attributable388JJattributable to389TOto the390DTthe government391NNgovernment or392CCor subject393NNsubject to394TOto APA395NPAPA review396NNreview .397SENT. And398CCand ,399,, secondly400RBsecondly ,401,, the402DTthe Secretary403NPSecretary acted404VVDact well405RBwell within406INwithin his407PP$his discretion408NNdiscretion when409WRBwhen he410PPhe determined411VVDdetermine that412IN/thatthat reinstating413VVGreinstate the414DTthe citizenship415NNcitizenship question416NNquestion would417MDwould provide418VVprovide the419DTthe best420JJSgood evidence421NNevidence of422INof citizenship423NNcitizenship .424SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]425LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Can426MDcan we427PPwe just428RBjust go429VVPgo back430RBback a431DTa bit432NNbit to433TOto your434PP$your opening435NNopening ?436SENT? Why437WRBwhy was438VBDbe the439DTthe citizenship440NNcitizenship question441NNquestion dropped442VVDdrop in443INin 1960444CD@card@ and445CCand remained446VVDremain off447RPoff for448INfor all449PDTall the450DTthe decades451NNSdecade after452INafter that453DTthat ?454SENT? What455WPWhat was456VBDbe the457DTthe reason458NNreason for459INfor dropping460VVGdrop it461PPit ?462SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]463LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Your464PP$your Honor465NPHonor ,466,, in467INin 1960468CD@card@ ,469,, it470PPit did471VVDdo n't472RBn't appear473VVappear in474INin anything475NNanything ,476,, and477CCand it478PPit was479VBDbe moved480VVNmove on481INon to482TOto the483DTthe American484NPAmerican Community485NPCommunity Survey486NPSurvey .487SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]488LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But489CCbut ...490:... but491CCbut why492RBwhy ...493:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]494LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] That495DTthat was496VBDbe part497NNpart of498INof an499DTan overall500JJoverall movement501NNmovement of502INof most503JJSmost of504INof the505DTthe demographic506JJdemographic ...507:... I508PPI 'm509VBPbe sorry510JJsorry ,511,, onto512INonto the513DTthe long-form514NNlong-form census515NNcensus ,516,, not517RBnot the518DTthe American519NPAmerican Community520NPCommunity Survey521NPSurvey .522SENT. And523CCand that524DTthat was525VBDbe part526NNpart of527INof a528DTa larger529JJRlarge process530NNprocess that531WDTthat moved532VVDmove a533DTa large534JJlarge number535NNnumber of536INof demographic537JJdemographic questions538NNSquestion off539RBoff of540INof the541DTthe short542JJshort form543NNform and544CCand onto545INonto the546DTthe long547JJlong form548NNform .549SENT. We550PPwe no551RBno longer552RBRlonger have553VHhave a554DTa long555JJlong form556NNform ,557,, so558RBso then559RBthen the560DTthe question561NNquestion is562VBZbe do563VVdo you564PPyou reinstate565VVreinstate the566DTthe long567JJlong form568NNform or569CCor do570VVdo you571PPyou ,572,, in573INin fact574NNfact ,575,, move576VVmove it577PPit back578RBback onto579INonto the580DTthe short-form581NNshort-form census582NNcensus .583SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]584LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But585CCbut did586VVDdo n't587RBn't ...588:... did589VVDdo n't590RBn't ...591:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]592LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] It593PPit was594VBDbe eminently595RBeminently ...596:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]597LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...598:... did599VVDdo n't600RBn't the601DTthe Census602NPCensus Bureau603NPBureau give604VVgive a605DTa reason606NNreason why607WRBwhy it608PPit was609VBDbe dropped610VVNdrop ?611SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]612LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Well613UHwell ,614,, they615PPthey generally616RBgenerally wanted617VVDwant to618TOto move619VVmove all620DTall of621INof the622DTthe demographic623JJdemographic questions624NNSquestion onto625INonto the626DTthe long627JJlong form628NNform .629SENT. We630PPwe no631RBno longer632RBRlonger have633VHhave a634DTa long635JJlong form636NNform .637SENT. And638CCand the639DTthe problems640NNSproblem with641INwith using642VVGuse the643DTthe American644NPAmerican Community645NPCommunity Survey646NPSurvey are647VBPbe well648RBwell known649VVNknow .650SENT. So651RBso you652PPyou basically653RBbasically ...654:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]655LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But656CCbut there657EXthere was658VBDbe nothing659NNnothing ...660:... there661EXthere was662VBDbe nothing663NNnothing in664INin 1960665CD@card@ to666TOto the667DTthe effect668NNeffect that669IN/thatthat the670DTthe Census671NPCensus Bureau672NPBureau found673VVDfind that674IN/thatthat putting675VVGput it676PPit on677INon the678DTthe short679JJshort form680NNform would681MDwould depress682VVdepress the683DTthe count684NNcount of685INof non-citizens686NNSnon-citizens ?687SENT? Nothing688NNnothing like689INlike that690DTthat ?691SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]692LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Well693UHwell ...694:... well695RBwell ,696,, sure697RBsure ,698,, Your699PP$your Honor700NPHonor ,701,, but702CCbut that703DTthat 's704VBZbe because705INbecause they706PPthey thought707VVDthink that708IN/thatthat ,709,, along710INalong with711INwith all712DTall of713INof the714DTthe other715JJother demographic716JJdemographic questions717NNSquestion in718INin the719DTthe census720NNcensus ,721,, had722VHDhave an723DTan overall724JJoverall impact725NNimpact of726INof ...727:... on728INon ...729:... on730INon ...731:... on732INon overall733JJoverall census734NNcensus accuracy735NNaccuracy .736SENT. And737CCand that738DTthat underscores739VVZunderscore why740WRBwhy we741PPwe do742VVPdo n't743RBn't think744VVthink this745DTthis is746VBZbe really747RBreally subject748JJsubject to749TOto judicial750JJjudicial review751NNreview ,752,, because753RBbecause ,754,, really755RBreally ,756,, what757WPwhat you758PPyou 're759VBPbe saying760VVGsay is761VBZbe that762IN/thatthat Congress763NPCongress ...764:... courts765NNScourt would766MDwould have767VHhave to768TOto review769VVreview every770DTevery question771NNquestion on772INon the773DTthe long774JJlong form775NNform to776TOto determine777VVdetermine if778INif the779DTthe informational780JJinformational value781NNvalue of782INof the783DTthe question784NNquestion outweighed785VVDoutweigh the786DTthe impact787NNimpact on788INon census789NNcensus accuracy790NNaccuracy ,791,, because792RBbecause ,793,, at794INat the795DTthe end796NNend of797INof the798DTthe day799NNday ,800,, if801INif you802PPyou add803VVPadd any804DTany particular805JJparticular question806NNquestion onto807INonto the808DTthe census809NNcensus ,810,, you811PPyou 're812VBPbe always813RBalways trading814VVGtrade off815RPoff information816NNinformation and817CCand accuracy818NNaccuracy .819SENT. And820CCand 141821CD@card@ (822(( a823DTa )824)) does825VVZdo n't826RBn't provide827VVprovide courts828NNScourt with829INwith a830DTa basis831NNbasis for832INfor evaluating833VVGevaluate that834DTthat determination835NNdetermination .836SENT. So837RBso that838DTthat 's839VBZbe why840WRBwhy we841PPwe think842VVPthink this843DTthis is844VBZbe n't845RBn't subject846JJsubject to847TOto APA848NPAPA review849NNreview at850INat all851DTall .852SENT. But853CCbut we854PPwe also855RBalso think856VVPthink that857IN/thatthat the858DTthe Respondents859NNSrespondent do860VVPdo n't861RBn't have862VHhave standing863NNstanding here864RBhere ,865,, because866INbecause they867PPthey 're868VBPbe injured869VVNinjure if870INif and871CCand only872RBonly if873INif ,874,, first875RBfirst ,876,, you877PPyou have878VHPhave third-party879JJthird-party action880NNaction ;881:; secondly882RBsecondly ,883,, you884PPyou have885VHPhave third-party886JJthird-party action887NNaction that888WDTthat 's889VBZbe illegal890JJillegal ;891:; and892CCand ,893,, third894JJthird ,895,, that896DTthat third-party897JJthird-party action898NNaction is899VBZbe based900VVNbase on901INon speculation902NNspeculation that903IN/thatthat the904DTthe government905NNgovernment will906MDwill itself907PPitself violate908VVviolate the909DTthe law910NNlaw .911SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]912LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] On913INon the914DTthe ...915:... on916INon the917DTthe illegality918NNillegality ,919,, is920VBZbe ...921:... is922VBZbe that923IN/thatthat a924DTa ...925:... a926DTa predictive927JJpredictive factor928NNfactor ?929SENT? In930INin other931JJother words932NNSword ,933,, do934VVPdo we935PPwe ,936,, as937INas our938PP$our cases939NNScase have940VHPhave often941RBoften said942VVNsay ,943,, do944VVPdo not945RBnot assume946VVassume illegal947JJillegal behavior948NNbehavior in949INin establishing950VVGestablish standing951NNstanding ,952,, but953CCbut is954VBZbe that955IN/thatthat simply956RBsimply predictive957JJpredictive ?958SENT? In959INin other960JJother words961NNSword ,962,, we963PPwe doubt964VVPdoubt people965NNSpeople are966VBPbe going967VVGgo to968TOto engage969VVengage on970INon a971DTa regular972JJregular basis973NNbasis in974INin illegal975JJillegal behavior976NNbehavior ,977,, and978CCand ,979,, therefore980RBtherefore ,981,, we982PPwe do983VVPdo n't984RBn't think985VVthink their986PP$their injury987NNinjury is988VBZbe ...989:... is990VBZbe tangible991JJtangible or992CCor likely993JJlikely ,994,, or995CCor is996VBZbe there997RBthere something998NNsomething special999JJspecial about1000INabout the1001DTthe fact1002NNfact that1003IN/thatthat it1004PPit 's1005VBZbe illegal1006JJillegal activity1007NNactivity ?1008SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1009LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Well1010UHwell ,1011,, I1012PPI think1013VVPthink ,1014,, Your1015PP$your Honor1016NPHonor ,1017,, in1018RBin ...1019:... in1020INin the1021DTthe Court1022NPCourt 's1023POS's past1024JJpast cases1025NNScase ,1026,, it1027PPit has1028VHZhave often1029RBoften been1030VBNbe used1031VVNuse as1032INas a1033DTa predictive1034JJpredictive factor1035NNfactor ,1036,, but1037CCbut I1038PPI also1039RBalso think1040VVPthink that1041IN/thatthat when1042WRBwhen you1043PPyou put1044VVPput it1045PPit all1046RBall together1047RBtogether ,1048,, it1049PPit breaks1050VVZbreak the1051DTthe chain1052NNchain of1053INof causation1054NNcausation for1055INfor Article1056NPArticle III1057NPIII causation1058NNcausation purposes1059NNSpurpose .1060SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1061LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I1062PPI mean1063VVPmean ,1064,, it1065PPit is1066VBZbe true1067JJtrue that1068IN/thatthat if1069INif people1070NNSpeople go1071VVPgo 601072CD@card@ miles1073NNSmile an1074DTan hour1075NNhour in1076INin a1077DTa 55-mile-an-hour1078JJ55-mile-an-hour zone1079NNzone ,1080,, that1081WDTthat 's1082VBZbe unlawful1083JJunlawful .1084SENT. But1085CCbut you1086PPyou would1087MDwould n't1088RBn't say1089VVsay that1090IN/thatthat they1091PPthey 're1092VBPbe not1093RBnot going1094VVGgo to1095TOto do1096VVdo that1097IN/thatthat in1098INin forming1099VVGform public1100JJpublic policy1101NNpolicy ...1102:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1103LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] And1104CCand ...1105:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1106LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] ...1107:... or1108CCor considering1109VVGconsider standing1110NNstanding .1111SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1112LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...1113:... I1114PPI ...1115:... I1116PPI agree1117VVPagree ,1118,, Your1119PP$your Honor1120NPHonor ,1121,, and1122CCand that1123DTthat 's1124VBZbe not1125RBnot our1126PP$our argument1127NNargument here1128RBhere .1129SENT. I1130PPI think1131VVPthink that1132IN/thatthat Clapper1133NPClapper is1134VBZbe a1135DTa good1136JJgood analogy1137NNanalogy .1138SENT. In1139INin Clapper1140NPClapper ,1141,, it1142PPit was1143VBDbe quite1144RBquite clear1145JJclear that1146IN/thatthat the1147DTthe plaintiffs1148NNSplaintiff in1149INin that1150DTthat case1151NNcase suffered1152VVDsuffer an1153DTan injury1154NNinjury in1155INin fact1156NNfact ,1157,, because1158INbecause they1159PPthey declined1160VVDdecline to1161TOto use1162VVuse their1163PP$their cell1164NNcell phones1165NNSphone to1166TOto communicate1167VVcommunicate with1168INwith their1169PP$their clients1170NNSclient and1171CCand their1172PP$their clients1173NNSclient declined1174VVDdecline to1175TOto use1176VVuse their1177PP$their cell1178NNcell phones1179NNSphone to1180TOto communicate1181VVcommunicate with1182INwith them1183PPthem out1184INout of1185INof a1186DTa fear1187NNfear that1188IN/thatthat their1189PP$their phone1190NNphone calls1191NNScall would1192MDwould be1193VBbe intercepted1194VVNintercept .1195SENT. No1196DTno question1197NNquestion that1198IN/thatthat there1199EXthere was1200VBDbe an1201DTan injury1202NNinjury in1203INin fact1204NNfact .1205SENT. But1206CCbut what1207WPwhat the1208DTthe Court1209NPCourt held1210VVDhold was1211VBDbe that1212IN/thatthat that1213DTthat injury1214NNinjury was1215VBDbe n't1216RBn't fairly1217RBfairly attributable1218JJattributable to1219TOto the1220DTthe government1221NNgovernment because1222INbecause it1223PPit was1224VBDbe caused1225VVNcause by1226INby the1227DTthe plaintiffs1228NNSplaintiff '1229POS' fear1230NNfear ...1231:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1232LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I1233PPI ...1234:... I1235PPI ...1236:... I1237PPI 'm1238VBPbe sorry1239JJsorry ,1240,, you1241PPyou 're1242VBPbe talking1243VVGtalk ...1244:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1245LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...1246:... that1247IN/thatthat the1248DTthe government1249NNgovernment would1250MDwould intercept1251VVintercept their1252PP$their calls1253NNScall .1254SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1255LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] You1256PPyou 're1257VBPbe talking1258VVGtalk proximate1259JJproximate cause1260NNcause ,1261,, which1262WDTwhich we1263PPwe 've1264VHPhave never1265RBnever used1266VVNuse .1267SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1268LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] No1269NPNo ,1270,, Your1271PP$your Honor1272NPHonor .1273SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1274LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] We1275PPwe 've1276VHPhave used1277VVNuse determinate1278JJdeterminate or1279CCor coercive1280JJcoercive effect1281NNeffect .1282SENT. In1283INin Wayfair1284NPWayfair ,1285,, one1286CDone of1287INof the1288DTthe reasons1289NNSreason we1290PPwe found1291VVDfind the1292DTthe stores1293NNSstore ,1294,, not1295RBnot the1296DTthe states1297NNSstate ,1298,, to1299TOto be1300VBbe injured1301VVNinjure is1302VBZbe because1303INbecause consumers1304NNSconsumer fail1305VVPfail to1306TOto pay1307VVpay taxes1308NNStaxis ,1309,, an1310DTan illegality1311NNillegality under1312INunder the1313DTthe law1314NNlaw .1315SENT. And1316CCand we1317PPwe said1318VVDsay that1319WDTthat 's1320VBZbe why1321WRBwhy the1322DTthe states1323NNSstate were1324VBDbe being1325VBGbe harmed1326VVNharm .1327SENT. In1328INin NAACP1329NPNAACP versus1330CCversus Alabama1331NPAlabama ,1332,, we1333PPwe held1334VVDhold the1335DTthe NAACP1336NPNAACP had1337VHDhave standing1338NNstanding ,1339,, even1340RBeven though1341INthough it1342PPit was1343VBDbe their1344PP$their members1345NNSmember who1346WPwho would1347MDwould be1348VBbe injured1349VVNinjure by1350INby other1351JJother people1352NNSpeople ,1353,, an1354DTan illegality1355NNillegality ,1356,, harassment1357NNharassment ,1358,, but1359CCbut as1360INas the1361DTthe just1362RBjust ...1363:... as1364INas Chief1365NPChief Justice1366NPJustice Roberts1367NPRoberts said1368VVDsay ,1369,, it1370PPit 's1371VBZbe predictable1372JJpredictable .1373SENT. There1374EXthere 's1375VBZbe no1376DTno doubt1377NNdoubt that1378IN/thatthat people1379NNSpeople will1380MDwill respond1381VVrespond less1382RBRless ...1383:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1384LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Uh-huh1385NPUh-huh .1386SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1387LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...1388:... because1389INbecause of1390INof the1391DTthe census1392NNcensus .1393SENT. That1394DTthat has1395VHZhave been1396VBNbe proven1397VVNprove in1398INin study1399NNstudy after1400INafter study1401NNstudy .1402SENT. One1403CDOne census1404NNcensus surveyor1405NNsurveyor described1406VVDdescribe an1407DTan incident1408NNincident where1409WRBwhere he1410PPhe walked1411VVDwalk into1412INinto a1413DTa home1414NNhome ,1415,, started1416VVDstart asking1417VVGask citizenship1418NNcitizenship ,1419,, and1420CCand the1421DTthe person1422NNperson stopped1423VVDstop and1424CCand left1425VVDleave his1426PP$his home1427NNhome ,1428,, leaving1429VVGleave the1430DTthe census1431NNcensus surveyor1432NNsurveyor sitting1433VVGsit there1434RBthere .1435SENT. So1436RBso ,1437,, if1438INif you1439PPyou 're1440VBPbe talking1441VVGtalk about1442INabout prediction1443NNprediction ,1444,, this1445DTthis is1446VBZbe about1447RBabout 1001448CD@card@ percent1449NNpercent that1450IN/thatthat people1451NNSpeople will1452MDwill answer1453VVanswer less1454RBRless ,1455,, so1456RBso ...1457:... but1458CCbut I1459PPI do1460VVPdo n't1461RBn't know1462VVknow that1463IN/thatthat it1464PPit 's1465VBZbe prediction1466NNprediction .1467SENT. It1468PPit 's1469VBZbe an1470DTan action1471NNaction by1472INby the1473DTthe government1474NNgovernment will1475MDwill be1476VBbe a1477DTa ...1478:... will1479MDwill be1480VBbe a1481DTa cause1482NNcause of1483INof this1484DTthis ,1485,, not1486RBnot proximate1487JJproximate necessarily1488RBnecessarily ,1489,, but1490CCbut that1491IN/thatthat cause1492NNcause will1493MDwill cause1494VVcause harm1495NNharm .1496SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1497LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right1498NPRight ,1499,, two1500CDtwo responses1501NNSresponse ,1502,, Your1503PP$your Honor1504NPHonor .1505SENT. First1506RBfirst ,1507,, we1508PPwe 're1509VBPbe not1510RBnot talking1511VVGtalk about1512INabout proximate1513JJproximate cause1514NNcause .1515SENT. We1516PPwe 're1517VBPbe talking1518VVGtalk about1519INabout an1520DTan analysis1521NNanalysis that1522WDTthat was1523VBDbe similar1524JJsimilar to1525TOto what1526WPwhat this1527DTthis Court1528NNcourt used1529VVNuse in1530INin the1531DTthe Clapper1532NPClapper case1533NNcase ,1534,, where1535WRBwhere the1536DTthe Clappers1537NNSclapper said1538VVDsay that1539IN/thatthat even1540RBeven though1541INthough there1542EXthere was1543VBDbe injury1544NNinjury in1545INin fact1546NNfact ,1547,, even1548RBeven though1549INthough the1550DTthe government1551NNgovernment 's1552POS's actions1553NNSaction were1554VBDbe in1555INin a1556DTa very1557RBvery real1558JJreal sense1559NNsense a1560DTa but-for1561NNbut-for cause1562NNcause of1563INof that1564DTthat injury1565NNinjury in1566INin fact1567NNfact ,1568,, it1569PPit was1570VBDbe n't1571RBn't fair1572JJfair to1573TOto attribute1574VVattribute that1575IN/thatthat to1576TOto the1577DTthe government1578NNgovernment because1579INbecause it1580PPit was1581VBDbe based1582VVNbase on1583INon the1584DTthe plaintiffs1585NNSplaintiff '1586POS' speculation1587NNspeculation that1588IN/thatthat the1589DTthe government1590NNgovernment would1591MDwould intercept1592VVintercept their1593PP$their telephone1594NNtelephone calls1595NNScall .1596SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1597LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But1598CCbut this1599DTthis is1600VBZbe not1601RBnot ...1602:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1603LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] You1604PPyou ...1605:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1606LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...1607:... the1608DTthe plaintiff1609NNplaintiff acting1610VVGact ;1611:; this1612DTthis is1613VBZbe third1614JJthird parties1615NNSparty acting1616VVGact .1617SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1618LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yes1619NPYes ,1620,, and1621CCand that1622WDTthat makes1623VVZmake it1624PPit ,1625,, we1626PPwe think1627VVPthink ,1628,, even1629RBeven worse1630JJRbad because1631INbecause the1632DTthe Court1633NPCourt 's1634POS's cases1635NNScase have1636VHPhave generally1637RBgenerally said1638VVNsay you1639PPyou do1640VVPdo n't1641RBn't rely1642VVrely on1643INon third-party1644JJthird-party standing1645NNstanding .1646SENT. But1647CCbut ...1648:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1649LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] You1650PPyou ...1651:... you1652PPyou said1653VVDsay you1654PPyou had1655VHDhave two1656CDtwo responses1657NNSresponse ?1658SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1659LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yeah1660NPYeah .1661SENT. The1662DTthe second1663NNsecond is1664VBZbe that1665IN/thatthat on1666INon NAACP1667NPNAACP against1668INagainst Alabama1669NPAlabama ,1670,, that1671WDTthat was1672VBDbe a1673DTa case1674NNcase where1675WRBwhere the1676DTthe NAACP1677NPNAACP was1678VBDbe being1679VBGbe directly1680RBdirectly regulated1681VVNregulate by1682INby the1683DTthe statute1684NNstatute that1685IN/thatthat they1686PPthey were1687VBDbe challenging1688VVGchallenge .1689SENT. They1690PPthey were1691VBDbe forced1692VVNforce to1693TOto disclose1694VVdisclose their1695PP$their private1696JJprivate membership1697NNmembership lists1698NNSlist ,1699,, and1700CCand that1701DTthat was1702VBDbe their1703PP$their injury1704NNinjury .1705SENT. There1706EXthere was1707VBDbe nobody1708NNnobody that1709WDTthat stood1710VVDstand in1711INin between1712INbetween them1713PPthem and1714CCand the1715DTthe disclosure1716NNdisclosure of1717INof their1718PP$their private1719JJprivate injury1720NNinjury ...1721:... private1722JJprivate membership1723NNmembership list1724NNlist .1725SENT. But1726CCbut turning1727VVGturn to1728TOto the1729DTthe agency1730NNagency reviewability1731NNreviewability argument1732NNargument ,1733,, there1734EXthere really1735RBreally is1736VBZbe nothing1737NNnothing in1738INin 1411739CD@card@ (1740(( a1741DTa )1742)) that1743WDTthat provides1744VVZprovide courts1745NNScourt with1746INwith a1747DTa basis1748NNbasis to1749TOto review1750VVreview this1751DTthis decision1752NNdecision .1753SENT. The1754DTthe language1755NNlanguage is1756VBZbe quite1757RBquite similar1758JJsimilar to1759TOto what1760WPwhat the1761DTthe Court1762NNcourt addressed1763VVNaddress in1764INin Webster1765NPWebster .1766SENT. Every1767DTevery ...1768:... the1769DTthe addition1770NNaddition of1771INof any1772DTany particular1773JJparticular demographic1774JJdemographic question1775NNquestion is1776VBZbe always1777RBalways going1778VVGgo to1779TOto be1780VBbe a1781DTa tradeoff1782NNtradeoff between1783INbetween information1784NNinformation and1785CCand accuracy1786NNaccuracy .1787SENT. And1788CCand I'd1789NNSI'd ...1790:... I'd1791NNSI'd ...1792:... I1793PPI 'd1794MDwould urge1795VVurge you1796PPyou to1797TOto look1798VVlook to1799TOto the1800DTthe 20001801CD@card@ long-form1802NNlong-form census1803NNcensus that1804WDTthat had1805VHDhave highly1806RBhighly detailed1807VVNdetail questions1808NNSquestion about1809RBabout not1810RBnot just1811RBjust citizenship1812NNcitizenship but1813CCbut things1814NNSthing like1815INlike your1816PP$your commuting1817VVGcommute time1818NNtime ,1819,, how1820WRBhow many1821JJmany bedrooms1822NNSbedroom you1823PPyou had1824VHDhave in1825INin your1826PP$your house1827NNhouse ,1828,, whether1829INwhether you1830PPyou suffered1831VVDsuffer from1832INfrom certain1833JJcertain health1834NNhealth conditions1835NNScondition .1836SENT. Under1837INunder Respondents1838NNSrespondent '1839POS' position1840NNposition ,1841,, courts1842NNScourt would1843MDwould have1844VHhave to1845TOto review1846VVreview each1847DTeach one1848CDone of1849INof those1850DTthose questions1851NNSquestion to1852TOto determine1853VVdetermine whether1854INwhether the1855DTthe informational1856JJinformational value1857NNvalue of1858INof that1859DTthat question1860NNquestion outweighed1861VVDoutweigh any1862DTany potential1863JJpotential impact1864NNimpact ...1865:... [JUSTICE BREYER]1866LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] On1867INon the1868DTthe main1869JJmain form1870NNform ...1871:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1872LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...1873:... on1874INon census1875NNcensus accuracy1876NNaccuracy .1877SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]1878LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...1879:... on1880INon the1881DTthe main1882JJmain form1883NNform ...1884:... on1885INon the1886DTthe main1887JJmain form1888NNform ,1889,, suppose1890VVPsuppose the1891DTthe Secretary1892NPSecretary puts1893VVZput in1894INin a1895DTa question1896NNquestion about1897INabout sexual1898JJsexual orientation1899NNorientation .1900SENT. Suppose1901VVsuppose he1902PPhe puts1903VVZput a1904DTa question1905NNquestion in1906INin about1907INabout arrest1908NNarrest record1909NNrecord .1910SENT. Suppose1911VVsuppose he1912PPhe says1913VVZsay ,1914,, I1915PPI 'm1916VBPbe going1917VVGgo to1918TOto have1919VHhave the1920DTthe whole1921JJwhole survey1922NNsurvey in1923INin French1924NPFrench .1925SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1926LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Uh-huh1927NPUh-huh .1928SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]1929LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] In1930INin other1931JJother words1932NNSword ,1933,, we1934PPwe have1935VHPhave no1936DTno role1937NNrole to1938TOto play1939VVplay no1940DTno matter1941NNmatter how1942WRBhow extreme1943JJextreme ?1944SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1945LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Your1946PP$your Honor1947NPHonor ,1948,, you1949PPyou certainly1950RBcertainly do1951VVPdo have1952VHhave a1953DTa role1954NNrole to1955TOto play1956VVplay ,1957,, and1958CCand I1959PPI think1960VVPthink ...1961:... [JUSTICE BREYER]1962LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] All1963DTall right1964NNright .1965SENT. Well1966UHwell ,1967,, then1968RBthen that1969DTthat 's1970VBZbe the1971DTthe question1972NNquestion .1973SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1974LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...1975:... and1976CCand I1977PPI think1978VVPthink your1979PP$your examples1980NNSexample ...1981:... [JUSTICE BREYER]1982LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] That1983DTthat 's1984VBZbe the1985DTthe question1986NNquestion .1987SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]1988LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yeah1989NPYeah .1990SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]1991LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] That1992DTthat 's1993VBZbe the1994DTthe question1995NNquestion .1996SENT. And1997CCand in1998INin this1999DTthis case2000NNcase ,2001,, there2002EXthere 's2003VBZbe a2004DTa statute2005NNstatute ,2006,, and2007CCand the2008DTthe statute2009NNstatute says2010VVZsay that2011IN/thatthat the2012DTthe Secretary2013NPSecretary ...2014:... at2015INat least2016JJSleast on2017INon this2018DTthis form2019NNform ,2020,, the2021DTthe main2022JJmain form2023NNform ,2024,, he2025PPhe shall2026MDshall use2027VVuse administrative2028JJadministrative records2029NNSrecord ,2030,, unless2031INunless ...2032:... it2033PPit says2034VVZsay to2035TOto the2036DTthe maximum2037JJmaximum extent2038NNextent possible2039JJpossible .2040SENT. Do2041VVPdo n't2042RBn't ask2043VVask direct2044JJdirect questions2045NNSquestion .2046SENT. Use2047VVuse administrative2048JJadministrative records2049NNSrecord ,2050,, because2051INbecause they2052PPthey want2053VVPwant to2054TOto keep2055VVkeep it2056PPit short2057JJshort .2058SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2059LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right2060NPRight .2061SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2062LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] To2063TOTo the2064DTthe maximum2065JJmaximum extent2066NNextent possible2067JJpossible .2068SENT. So2069RBso I2070PPI have2071VHPhave two2072CDtwo rather2073RBrather technical2074JJtechnical questions2075NNSquestion in2076INin what2077WPwhat I2078PPI think2079VVPthink is2080VBZbe the2081DTthe heart2082NNheart of2083INof this2084DTthis case2085NNcase .2086SENT. It2087PPit 's2088VBZbe a2089DTa technical2090JJtechnical case2091NNcase .2092SENT. All2093DTall right2094NNright .2095SENT. The2096DTthe first2097JJfirst question2098NNquestion is2099VBZbe the2100DTthe Secretary2101NPSecretary ,2102,, I2103PPI gather2104VVPgather from2105INfrom the2106DTthe record2107NNrecord ...2108:... and2109CCand we2110PPwe 've2111VHPhave looked2112VVNlook at2113INat it2114PPit ,2115,, my2116PP$my office2117NNoffice ,2118,, pretty2119RBpretty carefully2120RBcarefully ...2121:... is2122VBZbe told2123VVNtell by2124INby the2125DTthe Census2126NPCensus Bureau2127NPBureau in2128INin three2129CDthree studies2130NNSstudy that2131IN/thatthat if2132INif you2133PPyou ask2134VVPask this2135DTthis question2136NNquestion on2137INon the2138DTthe regular2139JJregular form2140NNform ,2141,, you2142PPyou will2143MDwill get2144VVget back2145RBback fewer2146JJRfew answers2147NNSanswer .2148SENT. And2149CCand they2150PPthey extrapolated2151VVDextrapolate to2152TOto do2153VVdo that2154IN/thatthat from2155INfrom the2156DTthe other2157JJother surveys2158NNSsurvey and2159CCand so2160RBso forth2161RBforth ,2162,, and2163CCand those2164DTthose extrapolations2165NNSextrapolation ,2166,, you2167PPyou know2168VVPknow ,2169,, holding2170VVGhold for2171INfor everything2172NNeverything constant2173JJconstant ,2174,, showed2175VVDshow that2176IN/thatthat the2177DTthe non-citizens2178NNSnon-citizens often2179RBoften did2180VVDdo n't2181RBn't say2182VVsay they2183PPthey were2184VBDbe non-citizens2185JJnon-citizens .2186SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2187LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Uh-huh2188NPUh-huh .2189SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2190LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And2191CCand some2192DTsome did2193VVDdo n't2194RBn't return2195VVreturn it2196PPit at2197INat all2198DTall .2199SENT. Now2200RBnow I2201PPI have2202VHPhave n't2203RBn't seen2204VVNsee any2205DTany evidence2206NNevidence to2207TOto the2208DTthe contrary2209NNcontrary .2210SENT. So2211RBso I2212PPI 'm2213VBPbe asking2214VVGask you2215PPyou where2216WRBwhere the2217DTthe evidence2218NNevidence is2219VBZbe on2220INon that2221DTthat .2222SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2223LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure2224NPSure .2225SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2226LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And2227CCand as2228RBas to2229TOto the2230DTthe second2231JJsecond ,2232,, same2233JJsame question2234NNquestion ,2235,, the2236DTthe second2237NNsecond is2238VBZbe that2239IN/thatthat several2240JJseveral surveys2241NNSsurvey ,2242,, including2243VVGinclude Dr2244NPDr .2245SENT. Abowd2246NNAbowd ,2247,, told2248VVDtell the2249DTthe Secretary2250NPSecretary :2251:: Mr2252NPMr .2253SENT. Secretary2254NPSecretary ,2255,, if2256INif you2257PPyou add2258VVPadd the2259DTthe question2260NNquestion to2261TOto the2262DTthe census2263NNcensus ,2264,, the2265DTthe short2266JJshort form2267NNform ,2268,, the2269DTthe direct2270JJdirect form2271NNform ,2272,, you2273PPyou will2274MDwill discover2275VVdiscover that2276IN/thatthat even2277RBeven the2278DTthe information2279NNinformation you2280PPyou want2281VVPwant about2282INabout citizenship2283NNcitizenship is2284VBZbe worse2285JJRbad than2286INthan if2287INif you2288PPyou just2289RBjust look2290VVPlook at2291INat the2292DTthe administrative2293JJadministrative record2294NNrecord .2295SENT. Now2296RBnow how2297WRBhow can2298MDcan that2299RBthat be2300VBbe ?2301SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2302LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure2303NPSure .2304SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2305LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Well2306UHWell ,2307,, A2308NPA ,2309,, they2310PPthey say2311VVPsay 132312CD@card@ million2313CDmillion people2314NNSpeople ,2315,, it2316PPit 'll2317MDwill be2318VBbe a2319DTa wash2320NNwash because2321INbecause you2322PPyou won2323MDwill 't2324RB't get2325VVget information2326NNinformation either2327CCeither way2328NNway .2329SENT. They2330PPthey won2331MDwill 't2332RB't return2333VVreturn it2334PPit and2335CCand you2336PPyou do2337VVPdo n't2338RBn't have2339VHhave it2340PPit over2341RPover on2342INon the2343DTthe administrative2344JJadministrative part2345NNpart .2346SENT. But2347CCbut ,2348,, as2349INas to2350TOto 222351CD@card@ million2352CDmillion ,2353,, which2354WDTwhich you2355PPyou highlight2356VVPhighlight in2357INin your2358PP$your brief2359NNbrief ...2360:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2361LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yeah2362NPYeah .2363SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2364LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...2365:... what2366WPwhat about2367INabout them2368PPthem ?2369SENT? And2370CCand as2371INas to2372TOto them2373PPthem ,2374,, what2375WPwhat Dr2376NNDr .2377SENT. Abowd2378NNAbowd says2379VVZsay he2380PPhe says2381VVZsay ,2382,, and2383CCand I2384PPI saw2385VVDsee it2386PPit in2387INin the2388DTthe record2389NNrecord ,2390,, he2391PPhe says2392VVZsay ,2393,, as2394RBas to2395TOto those2396DTthose 222397CD@card@ million2398CDmillion ,2399,, I2400PPI 'll2401MDwill tell2402VVtell you2403PPyou what2404WPwhat ,2405,, you2406PPyou just2407RBjust look2408VVPlook to2409TOto the2410DTthe census2411NNcensus returns2412NNSreturn and2413CCand you2414PPyou 're2415VBPbe going2416VVGgo to2417TOto find2418VVfind it2419PPit not2420RBnot that2421IN/thatthat accurate2422JJaccurate because2423INbecause some2424DTsome are2425VBPbe not2426RBnot going2427VVGgo to2428TOto tell2429VVtell the2430DTthe truth2431NNtruth .2432SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2433LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right2434NPRight .2435SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2436LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] So2437RBso go2438VVPgo look2439NNlook at2440INat the2441DTthe administrative2442JJadministrative returns2443NNSreturn ,2444,, and2445CCand they2446PPthey won2447MDwill 't2448RB't be2449VBbe there2450RBthere ,2451,, but2452CCbut we2453PPwe 'll2454MDwill model2455VVmodel them2456PPthem .2457SENT. Now2458RBnow the2459DTthe question2460NNquestion is2461VBZbe ,2462,, which2463WDTwhich is2464VBZbe more2465RBRmore accurate2466JJaccurate as2467RBas to2468TOto citizenship2469NNcitizenship ?2470SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2471LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure2472NPSure .2473SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2474LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] The2475DTthe models2476NNSmodel over2477INover here2478RBhere on2479INon the2480DTthe administrative2481JJadministrative part2482NNpart or2483CCor the2484DTthe answer2485NNanswer to2486TOto the2487DTthe questions2488NNSquestion on2489INon the2490DTthe census2491NNcensus part2492NNpart ?2493SENT? And2494CCand here2495RBhere is2496VBZbe what2497WPwhat Dr2498NNDr .2499SENT. Abowd2500NNAbowd says2501VVZsay :2502:: 222503CD@card@ million2504CDmillion ,2505,, he2506PPhe 's2507VBZbe asked2508VVNask ,2509,, if2510INif you2511PPyou follow2512VVPfollow your2513PP$your practice2514NNpractice ,2515,, you2516PPyou 'd2517MDwould use2518VVuse a2519DTa survey2520NNsurvey response2521NNresponse ,2522,, not2523RBnot model2524VVmodel it2525PPit ;2526:; is2527VBZbe that2528DTthat right2529NNright ?2530SENT? That2531DTthat 's2532VBZbe right2533JJright .2534SENT. And2535CCand in2536INin your2537PP$your opinion2538NNopinion ,2539,, that2540WDTthat would2541MDwould be2542VBbe less2543RBRless accurate2544JJaccurate than2545INthan if2546INif you2547PPyou just2548RBjust went2549VVDgo with2550INwith modeling2551VVGmodel over2552RPover on2553INon the2554DTthe administrative2555JJadministrative part2556NNpart ?2557SENT? That2558DTthat 's2559VBZbe correct2560JJcorrect .2561SENT. And2562CCand the2563DTthe conclusion2564NNconclusion of2565INof the2566DTthe Census2567NPCensus Bureau2568NPBureau remains2569VVZremain that2570IN/thatthat adding2571VVGadd the2572DTthe question2573NNquestion over2574INover here2575RBhere ,2576,, even2577RBeven if2578INif you2579PPyou use2580VVPuse the2581DTthe administrative2582JJadministrative part2583NNpart too2584RBtoo ,2585,, produces2586VVZproduce worse2587JJRbad citizen2588NNcitizen ...2589:... worse2590JJRbad data2591NNSdatum on2592INon citizenship2593NNcitizenship than2594INthan just2595RBjust using2596VVGuse the2597DTthe administrative2598JJadministrative data2599NNSdatum alone2600RBalone ?2601SENT? That2602DTthat 's2603VBZbe the2604DTthe question2605NNquestion .2606SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2607LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yep2608NPYep .2609SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2610LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Answer2611NNanswer from2612INfrom the2613DTthe expert2614NNexpert :2615:: "2616``" That2617DTthat 's2618VBZbe correct2619JJcorrect .2620SENT. "2621``" So2622RBso I2623PPI read2624VVPread that2625IN/thatthat ,2626,, and2627CCand ,2628,, you2629PPyou know2630VVPknow ,2631,, the2632DTthe judges2633NNSjudge below2634RBbelow have2635VHPhave listed2636VVNlist 142637CD@card@ other2638JJother examples2639NNSexample or2640CCor other2641JJother examples2642NNSexample ,2643,, many2644JJmany other2645JJother examples2646NNSexample ,2647,, and2648CCand ...2649:... and2650CCand ...2651:... but2652CCbut that2653DTthat 's2654VBZbe the2655DTthe most2656RBSmost direct2657JJdirect .2658SENT. So2659RBso where2660WRBwhere in2661INin the2662DTthe decision2663NNdecision memo2664NNmemo did2665VVDdo the2666DTthe Secretary2667NPSecretary address2668VVaddress that2669DTthat problem2670NNproblem ?2671SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2672LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] So2673RBso ,2674,, sure2675RBsure ,2676,, Your2677PP$your Honor2678NPHonor .2679SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2680LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Both2681CCboth problems2682NNSproblem .2683SENT. There2684EXthere are2685VBPbe two2686CDtwo problems2687NNSproblem .2688SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2689LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yes2690UHyes ,2691,, yes2692UHyes .2693SENT. And2694CCand I2695PPI 'd2696MDwould like2697VVlike to2698TOto address2699VVaddress that2700DTthat evidentiary2701JJevidentiary issue2702NNissue first2703RBfirst and2704CCand then2705RBthen I2706PPI would2707MDwould like2708VVlike to2709TOto come2710VVcome back2711RBback to2712TOto your2713PP$your question2714NNquestion about2715INabout Section2716NPSection 62717CD6 (2718(( c2719LSc )2720)) of2721INof the2722DTthe statute2723NNstatute as2724INas well2725RBwell .2726SENT. If2727INif you2728PPyou look2729VVPlook at2730INat the2731DTthe Joint2732NPJoint Appendix2733NPAppendix page2734NNpage 1482735CD@card@ ,2736,, the2737DTthe ...2738:... the2739DTthe Census2740NPCensus Bureau2741NPBureau staff2742NNstaff specifically2743RBspecifically told2744VVDtell the2745DTthe Secretary2746NPSecretary ...2747:... and2748CCand here2749RBhere I2750PPI 'm2751VBPbe quoting2752VVGquote from2753INfrom it2754PPit ...2755:... that2756IN/thatthat it2757PPit "2758``" cannot2759MDcan quantify2760VVquantify the2761DTthe relative2762JJrelative magnitude2763NNmagnitude of2764INof the2765DTthe errors2766NNSerror across2767INacross alternatives2768NNSalternative "2769''" ...2770:... and2771CCand he2772PPhe 's2773VBZbe talking2774VVGtalk about2775INabout Alternatives2776NNSalternative C2777NPC and2778CCand D2779NPD ...2780:... "2781``" at2782INat this2783DTthis time2784NNtime .2785SENT. "2786''" So2787RBso what2788WPwhat he2789PPhe was2790VBDbe saying2791VVGsay was2792VBDbe that2793IN/thatthat I2794PPI do2795VVPdo n't2796RBn't know2797VVknow if2798INif the2799DTthe response2800NNresponse error2801NNerror from2802INfrom asking2803VVGask the2804DTthe question2805NNquestion is2806VBZbe going2807VVGgo to2808TOto be2809VBbe more2810JJRmore or2811CCor less2812JJRless than2813INthan the2814DTthe prediction2815NNprediction error2816NNerror if2817INif I2818PPI use2819VVPuse ...2820:... [JUSTICE BREYER]2821LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No2822RBno ,2823,, he2824PPhe said2825VVDsay just2826RBjust what2827WPwhat you2828PPyou said2829VVDsay .2830SENT. He2831PPhe said2832VVDsay ,2833,, I2834PPI cannot2835MDcan quantify2836VVquantify it2837PPit .2838SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2839LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure2840NPSure .2841SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2842LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And2843CCand that2844WDTthat means2845VVZmean he2846PPhe can2847MDcan 't2848RB't put2849VVDput scientific2850JJscientific numbers2851NNSnumber .2852SENT. Of2853INof course2854NNcourse ,2855,, they2856PPthey said2857VVDsay that2858IN/thatthat they2859PPthey wanted2860VVDwant two2861CDtwo years2862NNSyear to2863TOto test2864VVtest it2865PPit ,2866,, but2867CCbut they2868PPthey can2869MDcan 't2870RB't quantify2871VVquantify it2872PPit .2873SENT. But2874CCbut we2875PPwe do2876VVPdo have2877VHhave three2878CDthree studies2879NNSstudy ,2880,, and2881CCand those2882DTthose studies2883NNSstudy look2884VVPlook at2885INat what2886WPwhat happened2887VVDhappen when2888WRBwhen you2889PPyou asked2890VVDask this2891DTthis question2892NNquestion before2893RBbefore ,2894,, and2895CCand what2896WPwhat happened2897VVDhappen when2898WRBwhen you2899PPyou asked2900VVDask this2901DTthis question2902NNquestion before2903RBbefore ...2904:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2905LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right2906RBright .2907SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2908LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...2909:... is2910VBZbe the2911DTthe response2912NNresponse rate2913NNrate fell2914VVDfall .2915SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2916LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] And2917CCand so2918RBso ,2919,, if2920INif I2921PPI could2922MDcould complete2923VVcomplete my2924PP$my answer2925NNanswer ,2926,, what2927WPwhat the2928DTthe Bureau2929NPBureau staff2930NNstaff told2931VVDtell him2932PPhim was2933VBDbe that2934IN/thatthat they2935PPthey did2936VVDdo n't2937RBn't know2938VVknow which2939WDTwhich one2940CDone would2941MDwould be2942VBbe better2943JJRgood or2944CCor worse2945JJRbad .2946SENT. So2947RBso what2948WPwhat the2949DTthe Secretary2950NPSecretary ...2951:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2952LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I2953PPI 'm2954VBPbe sorry2955JJsorry .2956SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]2957LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Where2958WRBwhere does2959VVZdo it2960PPit say2961VVPsay that2962RBthat ?2963SENT? Where2964WRBwhere does2965VVZdo it2966PPit say2967VVPsay that2968RBthat ?2969SENT? [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2970LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Maybe2971RBmaybe you2972PPyou could2973MDcould ,2974,, if2975INif you2976PPyou do2977VVPdo n't2978RBn't mind2979VVmind ,2980,, maybe2981RBmaybe you2982PPyou could2983MDcould complete2984VVcomplete your2985PP$your answer2986NNanswer .2987SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]2988LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure2989NPSure .2990SENT. That2991DTthat is2992VBZbe specifically2993RBspecifically ,2994,, Your2995PP$your Honor2996NPHonor ,2997,, at2998INat page2999NNpage 1483000CD@card@ of3001INof the3002DTthe Joint3003NPJoint Appendix3004NPAppendix ,3005,, where3006WRBwhere it3007PPit specifically3008RBspecifically says3009VVZsay and3010CCand explains3011VVZexplain that3012IN/thatthat it3013PPit cannot3014MDcan quantify3015VVquantify the3016DTthe relative3017JJrelative magnitude3018NNmagnitude of3019INof the3020DTthe errors3021NNSerror across3022INacross the3023DTthe alternatives3024NNSalternative ,3025,, Alternatives3026NNSalternative C3027NPC and3028CCand D3029NPD ,3030,, at3031INat this3032DTthis time3033NNtime because3034INbecause it3035PPit did3036VVDdo n't3037RBn't know3038VVknow if3039INif the3040DTthe response3041NNresponse errors3042NNSerror from3043INfrom asking3044VVGask the3045DTthe question3046NNquestion would3047MDwould be3048VBbe more3049JJRmore or3050CCor less3051JJRless than3052INthan the3053DTthe prediction3054NNprediction errors3055NNSerror from3056INfrom the3057DTthe model3058NNmodel .3059SENT. So3060RBso what3061WPwhat the3062DTthe Secretary3063NPSecretary knew3064VVDknow was3065VBDbe two3066CDtwo basic3067JJbasic things3068NNSthing ...3069:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3070LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I3071PPI 'm3072VBPbe sorry3073JJsorry .3074SENT. They3075PPthey ...3076:... they3077PPthey have3078VHPhave prediction3079NNprediction models3080NNSmodel .3081SENT. They3082PPthey say3083VVPsay multiple3084JJmultiple times3085NNStime ,3086,, at3087INat least3088JJSleast three3089CDthree ,3090,, if3091INif not3092RBnot more3093JJRmore ,3094,, that3095DTthat Alternative3096NPAlternative D3097NPD ,3098,, which3099WDTwhich was3100VBDbe the3101DTthe Secretary3102NPSecretary 's3103POS's alternative3104NNalternative ,3105,, and3106CCand their3107PP$their Alternative3108NPAlternative C3109NPC ,3110,, so3111RBso everybody3112NNeverybody 's3113VBZbe clear3114JJclear ,3115,, C3116NPC was3117VBDbe simply3118RBsimply to3119TOto use3120VVuse administrative3121JJadministrative records3122NNSrecord ,3123,, D3124NPD was3125VBDbe the3126DTthe Secretary3127NPSecretary 's3128POS's idea3129NNidea of3130INof adding3131VVGadd the3132DTthe question3133NNquestion to3134TOto the3135DTthe survey3136NNsurvey plus3137CCplus administrative3138JJadministrative records3139NNSrecord .3140SENT. And3141CCand on3142INon the3143DTthe prediction3144NNprediction models3145NNSmodel ,3146,, which3147WDTwhich is3148VBZbe what3149WPwhat scientists3150NNSscientist can3151MDcan do3152VVdo ,3153,, each3154DTeach and3155CCand every3156DTevery time3157NNtime they3158PPthey said3159VVDsay D3160NPD would3161MDwould be3162VBbe less3163RBRless accurate3164JJaccurate than3165INthan C3166NPC .3167SENT. Now3168RBnow you3169PPyou 're3170VBPbe asking3171VVGask ...3172:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3173LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Except3174INexcept for3175INfor the3176DTthe one3177CDone time3178NNtime where3179WRBwhere it3180PPit mattered3181VVDmatter ,3182,, Your3183PP$your Honor3184NPHonor ,3185,, in3186INin the3187DTthe key3188JJkey differences3189NNSdifference ...3190:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3191LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But3192CCbut comparative3193JJcomparative ...3194:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3195LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...3196:... memo3197NNmemo ,3198,, where3199WRBwhere they3200PPthey specifically3201RBspecifically said3202VVDsay that3203IN/thatthat they3204PPthey did3205VVDdo not3206RBnot know3207VVknow if3208INif C3209NPC was3210VBDbe better3211JJRgood than3212INthan D3213NPD .3214SENT. And3215CCand so3216INso what3217WPwhat the3218DTthe Secretary3219NPSecretary knew3220VVDknow ...3221:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3222LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] No3223UHNo ,3224,, no3225UHno ,3226,, no3227UHno ,3228,, no3229UHno ,3230,, that3231WDTthat 's3232VBZbe not3233RBnot what3234WPwhat he3235PPhe said3236VVDsay .3237SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3238LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] That3239DTthat is3240VBZbe exactly3241RBexactly what3242WPwhat he3243PPhe said3244VVDsay .3245SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3246LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] He3247PPhe said3248VVDsay you3249PPyou can3250MDcan 't3251RB't ...3252:... you3253PPyou 're3254VBPbe ...3255:... the3256DTthe words3257NNSword "3258``" comparative3259JJcomparative errors3260NNSerror "3261``" have3262VHPhave a3263DTa different3264JJdifferent meaning3265NNmeaning than3266INthan you3267PPyou 're3268VBPbe giving3269VVGgive it3270PPit .3271SENT. Comparative3272JJcomparative errors3273NNSerror are3274VBPbe I3275PPI 'm3276VBPbe comparing3277VVGcompare this3278DTthis type3279NNtype of3280INof error3281NNerror to3282TOto that3283DTthat type3284NNtype of3285INof error3286NNerror and3287CCand what3288WPwhat they3289PPthey compare3290VVPcompare each3291DTeach other3292JJother to3293TOto .3294SENT. You3295PPyou can3296MDcan 't3297RB't do3298VVPdo that3299IN/thatthat to3300TOto a3301DTa scientific3302JJscientific certainty3303NNcertainty .3304SENT. But3305CCbut you3306PPyou can3307MDcan have3308VHhave predictive3309JJpredictive models3310NNSmodel ,3311,, which3312WDTwhich is3313VBZbe what3314WPwhat they3315PPthey did3316VVDdo ,3317,, and3318CCand they3319PPthey ...3320:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3321LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right3322RBright .3323SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3324LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...3325:... showed3326VVDshow you3327PPyou ,3328,, time3329NNtime and3330CCand again3331RBagain they3332PPthey told3333VVDtell you3334PPyou ,3335,, you3336PPyou add3337VVPadd the3338DTthe survey3339NNsurvey question3340NNquestion ,3341,, it3342PPit 's3343VBZbe going3344VVGgo to3345TOto be3346VBbe less3347RBRless accurate3348JJaccurate than3349INthan just3350RBjust relying3351VVGrely on3352INon administrative3353JJadministrative records3354NNSrecord .3355SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3356LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Your3357PP$your Honor3358NPHonor ,3359,, I3360PPI ...3361:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3362LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So3363RBso how3364WRBhow do3365VVPdo you3366PPyou ...3367:... how3368WRBhow do3369VVPdo you3370PPyou take3371VVtake or3372CCor pluck3373VVpluck out3374RPout of3375INof what3376WPwhat they3377PPthey say3378VVPsay in3379INin one3380CDone sentence3381NNsentence ,3382,, if3383INif you3384PPyou 're3385VBPbe the3386DTthe Secretary3387NPSecretary ,3388,, and3389CCand rely3390VVrely on3391INon that3392DTthat one3393CDone sentence3394NNsentence and3395CCand ignore3396VVignore the3397DTthe wealth3398NNwealth of3399INof statistics3400NNSstatistic ,3401,, graphs3402NNSgraph ,3403,, testimony3404NNtestimony ,3405,, proof3406NNproof ,3407,, control3408NNcontrol studies3409NNSstudy of3410INof how3411WRBhow ...3412:... how3413WRBhow these3414DTthese response3415NNresponse rates3416NNSrate came3417VVDcome about3418RBabout and3419CCand decide3420VVPdecide that3421IN/thatthat that3422DTthat one3423CDone sentence3424NNsentence is3425VBZbe enough3426JJenough to3427TOto justify3428VVjustify ignoring3429VVGignore everything3430NNeverything else3431RBelse ?3432SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3433LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Because3434INbecause ,3435,, Your3436PP$your Honor3437NPHonor ,3438,, I3439PPI respectfully3440RBrespectfully disagree3441VVPdisagree with3442INwith your3443PP$your reading3444NNreading of3445INof the3446DTthe administrative3447JJadministrative record3448NNrecord .3449SENT. If3450INif you3451PPyou read3452VVPread through3453INthrough the3454DTthe key3455JJkey differences3456NNSdifference memo3457NNmemo ,3458,, what3459WPwhat the3460DTthe Bureau3461NPBureau staff3462NNstaff is3463VBZbe telling3464VVGtell to3465TOto the3466DTthe Secretary3467NPSecretary ...3468:... and3469CCand ,3470,, look3471VVPlook ,3472,, there3473EXthere 's3474VBZbe no3475DTno question3476NNquestion that3477IN/thatthat the3478DTthe Bureau3479NPBureau staff3480NNstaff preferred3481VVDprefer not3482RBnot to3483TOto have3484VHhave this3485DTthis question3486NNquestion on3487INon the3488DTthe census3489NNcensus ...3490:... but3491CCbut what3492WPwhat they3493PPthey were3494VBDbe telling3495VVGtell the3496DTthe Secretary3497NPSecretary was3498VBDbe that3499IN/thatthat they3500PPthey could3501MDcould n't3502RBn't tell3503VVtell which3504WDTwhich model3505NNmodel would3506MDwould be3507VBbe more3508JJRmore or3509CCor less3510RBRless accurate3511JJaccurate .3512SENT. But3513CCbut they3514PPthey did3515VVDdo give3516VVgive him3517PPhim specific3518JJspecific information3519NNinformation .3520SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]3521LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But3522CCbut ,3523,, General3524NPGeneral ...3525:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3526LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] They3527PPthey told3528VVDtell him3529PPhim that3530RBthat ...3531:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]3532LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Please3533VVplease finish3534NNfinish .3535SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3536LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] They3537PPthey told3538VVDtell him3539PPhim that3540IN/thatthat if3541INif he3542PPhe actually3543RBactually asked3544VVDask the3545DTthe question3546NNquestion for3547INfor 303548CD@card@ ...3549:... for3550INfor 223551CD@card@ .3552SENT. 23553CD2 million3554CDmillion people3555NNSpeople for3556INfor whom3557WPwhom no3558DTno administrative3559JJadministrative records3560NNSrecord existed3561VVDexist ,3562,, he3563PPhe would3564MDwould have3565VHhave got3566VVNget actual3567JJactual answers3568NNSanswer at3569INat 983570CD@card@ percent3571NNpercent accuracy3572NNaccuracy .3573SENT. And3574CCand that3575IN/thatthat the3576DTthe alternative3577NNalternative ,3578,, their3579PP$their preferred3580JJpreferred alternative3581NNalternative ,3582,, was3583VBDbe to3584TOto use3585VVuse a3586DTa statistical3587JJstatistical model3588NNmodel to3589TOto estimate3590VVestimate citizenship3591NNcitizenship ,3592,, not3593RBnot just3594RBjust for3595INfor the3596DTthe 223597CD@card@ .3598SENT. 23599CD2 million3600CDmillion but3601CCbut for3602INfor 353603CD@card@ million3604CDmillion ,3605,, but3606CCbut they3607PPthey had3608VHDhave not3609RBnot yet3610RByet constructed3611VVNconstruct that3612IN/thatthat model3613NNmodel and3614CCand did3615VVDdo n't3616RBn't know3617VVknow what3618WPwhat the3619DTthe error3620NNerror rate3621NNrate in3622INin that3623DTthat model3624NNmodel would3625MDwould be3626VBbe .3627SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]3628LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But3629CCbut I3630PPI ...3631:... I3632PPI ...3633:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3634LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] And3635CCand so3636RBso the3637DTthe ...3638:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]3639LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...3640:... I3641PPI think3642VVPthink ,3643,, General3644NPGeneral ,3645,, I3646PPI mean3647VVPmean ,3648,, 983649CD@card@ percent3650NNpercent sounds3651VVZsound awfully3652RBawfully high3653JJhigh ,3654,, but3655CCbut it3656PPit 's3657VBZbe kind3658NNkind of3659INof irrelevant3660JJirrelevant too3661RBtoo .3662SENT. The3663DTthe question3664NNquestion is3665VBZbe whether3666INwhether ,3667,, if3668INif you3669PPyou used3670VVDuse the3671DTthe model3672NNmodel ,3673,, it3674PPit would3675MDwould be3676VBbe greater3677JJRgreat than3678INthan 983679CD@card@ percent3680NNpercent .3681SENT. It3682PPit would3683MDwould be3684VBbe 993685CD@card@ .3686SENT. 53687CD5 percent3688NNpercent .3689SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3690LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right3691NPRight .3692SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]3693LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Because3694INbecause then3695RBthen the3696DTthe Secretary3697NPSecretary would3698MDwould have3699VHhave no3700DTno basis3701NNbasis for3702INfor saying3703VVGsay that3704IN/thatthat you3705PPyou should3706MDshould use3707VVuse the3708DTthe question3709NNquestion rather3710RBrather than3711INthan the3712DTthe model3713NNmodel .3714SENT. And3715CCand as3716RBas to3717TOto that3718WDTthat ,3719,, as3720INas I3721PPI think3722VVPthink my3723PP$my colleagues3724NNScolleague are3725VBPbe suggesting3726VVGsuggest ,3727,, there3728EXthere is3729VBZbe a3730DTa bottom-line3731JJbottom-line conclusion3732NNconclusion from3733INfrom the3734DTthe Census3735NPCensus Bureau3736NPBureau ,3737,, and3738CCand the3739DTthe bottom-line3740JJbottom-line conclusion3741NNconclusion is3742VBZbe that3743IN/thatthat Alternative3744NPAlternative D3745NPD ,3746,, which3747WDTwhich is3748VBZbe the3749DTthe proposal3750NNproposal that3751IN/thatthat the3752DTthe Secretary3753NPSecretary eventually3754RBeventually took3755VVDtake ,3756,, would3757MDwould still3758RBstill have3759VHhave all3760PDTall the3761DTthe negative3762JJnegative cost3763NNcost and3764CCand quality3765NNquality implications3766NNSimplication of3767INof Alternative3768NPAlternative B3769NPB ,3770,, which3771WDTwhich was3772VBDbe simply3773RBsimply adding3774VVGadd the3775DTthe question3776NNquestion alone3777RBalone ,3778,, and3779CCand would3780MDwould result3781VVresult in3782INin poorer3783JJRpoor quality3784NNquality citizenship3785NNcitizenship data3786NNSdatum than3787INthan Alternative3788NPAlternative C3789NPC ,3790,, which3791WDTwhich is3792VBZbe just3793RBjust using3794VVGuse the3795DTthe administrative3796JJadministrative records3797NNSrecord plus3798CCplus the3799DTthe modeling3800NNmodeling .3801SENT. So3802RBso there3803EXthere is3804VBZbe a3805DTa bottom-line3806JJbottom-line conclusion3807NNconclusion from3808INfrom the3809DTthe Census3810NPCensus Bureau3811NPBureau .3812SENT. And3813CCand it3814PPit seems3815VVZseem as3816RBas though3817INthough what3818WPwhat the3819DTthe Secretary3820NPSecretary needs3821VVZneed is3822VBZbe some3823DTsome ...3824:... I3825PPI mean3826VVPmean ,3827,, a3828DTa Secretary3829NPSecretary can3830MDcan deviate3831VVdeviate ...3832:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3833LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Uh-huh3834NPUh-huh .3835SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]3836LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...3837:... from3838INfrom his3839PP$his experts3840NNSexpert '3841POS' recommendations3842NNSrecommendation and3843CCand from3844INfrom his3845PP$his experts3846NNSexpert '3847POS' bottom-line3848JJbottom-line conclusions3849NNSconclusion .3850SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3851LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right3852NPRight .3853SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]3854LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But3855CCbut the3856DTthe Secretary3857NPSecretary needs3858VVZneed reasons3859NNSreason to3860TOto do3861VVdo that3862IN/thatthat ,3863,, and3864CCand I3865PPI searched3866VVDsearch the3867DTthe record3868NNrecord and3869CCand I3870PPI do3871VVPdo n't3872RBn't see3873VVsee any3874DTany reason3875NNreason .3876SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]3877LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure3878NPSure .3879SENT. And3880CCand ,3881,, Your3882PP$your Honor3883NPHonor ,3884,, so3885RBso I3886PPI want3887VVPwant to3888TOto just3889RBjust finish3890VVfinish what3891WPwhat I3892PPI was3893VBDbe saying3894VVGsay instantly3895RBinstantly before3896RBbefore because3897INbecause I3898PPI think3899VVPthink it3900PPit ...3901:... it3902PPit responds3903VVZrespond to3904TOto your3905PP$your question3906NNquestion ,3907,, and3908CCand then3909RBthen I3910PPI 'd3911MDwould like3912VVlike to3913TOto expand3914VVexpand directly3915RBdirectly in3916INin response3917NNresponse to3918TOto your3919PP$your question3920NNquestion .3921SENT. What3922WPWhat the3923DTthe Secretary3924NPSecretary concluded3925VVDconclude was3926VBDbe ,3927,, in3928INin the3929DTthe face3930NNface of3931INof uncertainty3932NNuncertainty ,3933,, he3934PPhe 'd3935MDwould rather3936RBrather go3937VVgo with3938INwith the3939DTthe bird3940NNbird in3941INin a3942DTa hand3943NNhand and3944CCand ask3945VVask the3946DTthe question3947NNquestion at3948INat percent3949NNpercent accuracy3950NNaccuracy than3951INthan an3952DTan unknown3953JJunknown and3954CCand untested3955JJuntested statistical3956JJstatistical model3957NNmodel .3958SENT. And3959CCand that3960DTthat 's3961VBZbe ,3962,, after3963INafter all3964DTall ,3965,, the3966DTthe same3967JJsame preference3968NNpreference that3969IN/thatthat the3970DTthe Enumeration3971NNenumeration Clause3972NNclause itself3973PPitself makes3974VVZmake ,3975,, a3976DTa prefer3977VVPprefer ...3978:... preference3979NNpreference for3980INfor actual3981JJactual counting3982NNcounting over3983INover estimation3984NNestimation ,3985,, because3986INbecause actual3987JJactual counting3988NNcounting is3989VBZbe less3990RBRless efficient3991JJefficient .3992SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3993LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But3994CCbut not3995RBnot census3996NNcensus ...3997:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]3998LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well3999UHWell ,4000,, if4001INif I4002PPI can4003MDcan just4004RBjust add4005VVadd to4006TOto the4007DTthe question4008NNquestion ,4009,, and4010CCand ...4011:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4012LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] But4013CCbut to4014TOto go4015VVgo ...4016:... to4017TOto go4018VVgo to4019TOto your4020PP$your question4021NNquestion ...4022:... yes4023UHyes .4024SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4025LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...4026:... and4027CCand let4028VVlet me4029PPme just4030RBjust add4031VVPadd to4032TOto it4033PPit a4034DTa bit4035NNbit because4036INbecause you4037PPyou said4038VVDsay ,4039,, you4040PPyou know4041VVPknow ,4042,, an4043DTan unknown4044JJunknown and4045CCand untested4046JJuntested statistical4047JJstatistical model4048NNmodel ,4049,, but4050CCbut here4051RBhere are4052VBPbe his4053PP$his experts4054NNSexpert in4055INin the4056DTthe Census4057NPCensus Bureau4058NPBureau saying4059VVGsay we4060PPwe are4061VBPbe confident4062JJconfident that4063IN/thatthat we4064PPwe can4065MDcan produce4066VVproduce a4067DTa statistical4068JJstatistical model4069NNmodel that4070WDTthat will4071MDwill produce4072VVproduce more4073RBRmore accurate4074JJaccurate bottom-line4075JJbottom-line results4076NNSresult ,4077,, and4078CCand ...4079:... and4080CCand ,4081,, again4082RBagain ,4083,, this4084DTthis bottom-line4085JJbottom-line conclusion4086NNconclusion is4087VBZbe the4088DTthe same4089JJsame .4090SENT. They4091PPthey know4092VVPknow what4093WPwhat kind4094NNkind of4095INof statistical4096JJstatistical models4097NNSmodel they4098PPthey can4099MDcan build4100VVbuild .4101SENT. And4102CCand this4103DTthis is4104VBZbe the4105DTthe bottom-line4106JJbottom-line conclusion4107NNconclusion .4108SENT. And4109CCand where4110WRBwhere is4111VBZbe the4112DTthe reason4113NNreason that4114IN/thatthat the4115DTthe Secretary4116NPSecretary gives4117VVZgive as4118INas to4119TOto why4120WRBwhy he4121PPhe rejects4122VVZreject that4123DTthat ?4124SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4125LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] So4126INso there4127EXthere are4128VBPbe a4129DTa couple4130NNcouple of4131INof reasons4132NNSreason ,4133,, Your4134PP$your Honor4135NPHonor .4136SENT. First4137JJfirst of4138INof all4139DTall ,4140,, although4141INalthough they4142PPthey had4143VHDhave a4144DTa high4145JJhigh confidence4146NNconfidence that4147IN/thatthat they4148PPthey could4149MDcould create4150VVcreate a4151DTa good4152JJgood statistical4153JJstatistical model4154NNmodel ,4155,, they4156PPthey were4157VBDbe not4158RBnot able4159JJable to4160TOto tell4161VVtell him4162PPhim that4163IN/thatthat they4164PPthey thought4165VVDthink that4166IN/thatthat that4167DTthat model4168NNmodel would4169MDwould be4170VBbe any4171DTany better4172JJRgood or4173CCor worse4174RBRworse an4175DTan estimation4176NNestimation .4177SENT. They4178PPthey never4179RBnever were4180VBDbe able4181JJable to4182TOto say4183VVsay that4184WDTthat would4185MDwould ...4186:... it4187PPit would4188MDwould beat4189VVbeat that4190IN/thatthat 984191CD@card@ percent4192NNpercent number4193NNnumber .4194SENT. So4195RBso ,4196,, in4197INin the4198DTthe face4199NNface of4200INof that4201DTthat uncertainty4202NNuncertainty ,4203,, he4204PPhe reasonably4205RBreasonably chose4206VVDchoose ...4207:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4208LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] I4209PPI think4210VVPthink what4211WPwhat I4212PPI read4213VVPread you4214PPyou is4215VBZbe them4216PPthem saying4217VVGsay that4218IN/thatthat they4219PPthey could4220MDcould beat4221VVbeat the4222DTthe percent4223NNpercent number4224NNnumber .4225SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4226LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] No4227NPNo ,4228,, Your4229PP$your Honor4230NPHonor ,4231,, I4232PPI do4233VVPdo n't4234RBn't think4235VVthink that4236DTthat 's4237VBZbe what4238WPwhat they4239PPthey 're4240VBPbe saying4241VVGsay there4242RBthere .4243SENT. I4244PPI think4245VVPthink what4246WPwhat they4247PPthey 're4248VBPbe saying4249VVGsay there4250EXthere is4251VBZbe that4252DTthat if4253INif you4254PPyou ask4255VVPask the4256DTthe citizenship4257NNcitizenship question4258NNquestion ,4259,, it4260PPit will4261MDwill make4262VVmake the4263DTthe model4264NNmodel a4265DTa little4266JJlittle bit4267NNbit less4268RBRless accurate4269JJaccurate because4270INbecause you4271PPyou 're4272VBPbe going4273VVGgo to4274TOto have4275VHhave fewer4276JJRfew people4277NNSpeople for4278INfor whom4279WPwhom there4280RBthere are4281VBPbe administrative4282JJadministrative records4283NNSrecord ,4284,, but4285CCbut you4286PPyou actually4287RBactually have4288VHhave to4289TOto use4290VVuse that4291DTthat model4292NNmodel for4293INfor a4294DTa much4295RBmuch smaller4296JJRsmall number4297NNnumber of4298INof people4299NNSpeople because4300INbecause you4301PPyou have4302VHPhave actual4303JJactual answers4304NNSanswer from4305INfrom 224306CD@card@ .4307SENT. 24308CD2 million4309CDmillion at4310INat 984311CD@card@ percent4312NNpercent accuracy4313NNaccuracy .4314SENT. So4315RBso that4316DTthat 's4317VBZbe what4318WPwhat they4319PPthey 're4320VBPbe saying4321VVGsay .4322SENT. But4323CCbut what4324WPwhat they4325PPthey could4326MDcould n't4327RBn't come4328VVcome down4329RPdown with4330INwith a4331DTa conclusion4332NNconclusion on4333RBon is4334VBZbe whether4335INwhether it4336PPit would4337MDwould be4338VBbe more4339JJRmore or4340CCor less4341RBRless accurate4342JJaccurate to4343TOto ask4344VVask the4345DTthe question4346NNquestion ...4347:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4348LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] All4349DTall right4350NNright .4351SENT. When4352WRBwhen you4353PPyou answer4354VVPanswer this4355DTthis question4356NNquestion ...4357:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4358LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...4359:... or4360CCor use4361VVuse the4362DTthe model4363NNmodel .4364SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4365LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So4366RBso can4367MDcan I4368PPI just4369RBjust ask4370VVPask ...4371:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4372LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Would4373MDwould you4374PPyou answer4375VVanswer this4376DTthis question4377NNquestion ?4378SENT? Wait4379VVwait .4380SENT. I4381PPI am4382VBPbe trying4383VVGtry ,4384,, go4385VVgo back4386RBback to4387TOto my4388PP$my question4389NNquestion ,4390,, to4391TOto write4392VVwrite down4393RPdown the4394DTthe pages4395NNSpage .4396SENT. I4397PPI 'm4398VBPbe not4399RBnot going4400VVGgo to4401TOto ,4402,, you4403PPyou know4404VVPknow ,4405,, resolve4406VVresolve this4407DTthis right4408NNright now4409RBnow .4410SENT. So4411RBso ,4412,, when4413WRBwhen Justice4414NPJustice Kagan4415NPKagan asked4416VVDask the4417DTthe question4418NNquestion or4419CCor I4420PPI do4421VVPdo ,4422,, you4423PPyou 've4424VHPhave mentioned4425VVNmention page4426NNpage 1484427CD@card@ .4428SENT. Insofar4429RBinsofar in4430INin answer4431NNanswer to4432TOto her4433PP$her question4434NNquestion or4435CCor to4436TOto mine4437NNmine ,4438,, if4439INif you4440PPyou could4441MDcould give4442VVgive me4443PPme a4444DTa few4445JJfew things4446NNSthing to4447TOto read4448VVread to4449TOto show4450VVshow that4451IN/thatthat he4452PPhe did4453VVDdo consider4454VVconsider it4455PPit ,4456,, to4457TOto show4458VVshow that4459IN/thatthat he4460PPhe did4461VVDdo give4462VVgive a4463DTa reason4464NNreason for4465INfor rejecting4466VVGreject it4467PPit ,4468,, that4469WDTthat would4470MDwould be4471VBbe helpful4472JJhelpful to4473TOto me4474PPme .4475SENT. Sorry4476RBsorry .4477SENT. Go4478VVgo back4479RBback to4480TOto you4481PPyou .4482SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4483LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] So4484RBso ,4485,, Your4486PP$your Honor4487NPHonor ,4488,, if4489INif you4490PPyou look4491VVPlook at4492INat Secretary4493NPSecretary Ross4494NPRoss 's4495POS's decision4496NNdecision memo4497NNmemo ,4498,, the4499DTthe pre-4500NNpre- ...4501:... the4502DTthe decision4503NNdecision memo4504NNmemo in4505INin the4506DTthe Petitioners4507NNSpetitioner '4508POS' appendix4509NNappendix ,4510,, I4511PPI would4512MDwould look4513VVlook to4514TOto a4515DTa couple4516NNcouple of4517INof things4518NNSthing .4519SENT. First4520JJfirst of4521INof all4522DTall ,4523,, I4524PPI would4525MDwould look4526VVlook to4527TOto his4528PP$his discussion4529NNdiscussion on4530INon pages4531NNSpage 555a4532NN555a with4533INwith the4534DTthe problems4535NNSproblem with4536INwith administrative4537JJadministrative records4538NNSrecord .4539SENT. The4540DTthe bureau4541NNbureau is4542VBZbe still4543RBstill evolving4544VVGevolve its4545PP$its use4546NNuse of4547INof administrative4548JJadministrative records4549NNSrecord ,4550,, and4551CCand the4552DTthe bureau4553NNbureau does4554VVZdo not4555RBnot yet4556RByet have4557VHhave complete4558JJcomplete administrative4559JJadministrative records4560NNSrecord data4561NNSdatum set4562VVNset for4563INfor the4564DTthe entire4565JJentire population4566NNpopulation .4567SENT. And4568CCand that4569DTthat points4570NNSpoint out4571INout why4572WRBwhy he4573PPhe preferred4574VVDprefer asking4575VVGask the4576DTthe question4577NNquestion and4578CCand getting4579VVGget actual4580JJactual answers4581NNSanswer from4582INfrom 224583CD@card@ .4584SENT. 24585CD2 million4586CDmillion people4587NNSpeople at4588INat 984589CD@card@ percent4590NNpercent accuracy4591NNaccuracy ,4592,, because4593INbecause you4594PPyou simply4595RBsimply did4596VVDdo n't4597RBn't have4598VHhave administrative4599JJadministrative records4600NNSrecord for4601INfor 354602CD@card@ million4603CDmillion people4604NNSpeople ,4605,, and4606CCand the4607DTthe bureau4608NNbureau had4609VHDhave not4610RBnot yet4611RByet figured4612VVNfigure out4613INout how4614WRBhow to4615TOto do4616VVdo that4617DTthat estimation4618NNestimation .4619SENT. He4620PPhe then4621RBthen goes4622VVZgo on4623RPon to4624TOto say4625VVsay on4626INon that4627DTthat same4628JJsame page4629NNpage ,4630,, more4631JJRmore than4632INthan 104633CD@card@ percent4634NNpercent of4635INof the4636DTthe American4637JJAmerican population4638NNpopulation ,4639,, some4640DTsome 254641CD@card@ million4642CDmillion voting-age4643NNvoting-age people4644NNSpeople ,4645,, would4646MDwould need4647VVneed to4648TOto have4649VHhave their4650PP$their citizen4651NNcitizen age4652NNage imputed4653VVNimpute by4654INby the4655DTthe Census4656NPCensus Bureau4657NPBureau .4658SENT. And4659CCand so4660RBso he4661PPhe was4662VBDbe making4663VVGmake clear4664JJclear that4665IN/thatthat he4666PPhe 'd4667MDwould rather4668RBrather go4669VVgo with4670INwith actual4671JJactual counting4672NNcounting than4673INthan imputation4674NNimputation .4675SENT. And4676CCand he4677PPhe pointed4678VVDpoint out4679RPout that4680IN/thatthat by4681INby proceeding4682VVGproceed with4683INwith his4684PP$his preferred4685JJpreferred course4686NNcourse ...4687:... this4688DTthis is4689VBZbe at4690INat page4691NNpage 556a4692NN556a of4693INof the4694DTthe Petitioners4695NNSpetitioner '4696POS' appendix4697NNappendix ...4698:... this4699DTthis may4700MDmay eliminate4701VVeliminate the4702DTthe need4703NNneed for4704INfor the4705DTthe Census4706NPCensus Bureau4707NPBureau to4708TOto have4709VHhave to4710TOto impute4711VVimpute an4712DTan answer4713NNanswer for4714INfor millions4715NNSmillion of4716INof people4717NNSpeople ,4718,, specifically4719RBspecifically about4720INabout 224721CD@card@ .4722SENT. 24723CD2 million4724CDmillion people4725NNSpeople for4726INfor whom4727WPwhom the4728DTthe bureau4729NNbureau ...4730:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4731LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But4732CCbut ...4733:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4734LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...4735:... told4736VVDtell him4737PPhim he4738PPhe would4739MDwould get4740VVget actual4741JJactual answers4742NNSanswer at4743INat 984744CD@card@ percent4745NNpercent accuracy4746NNaccuracy .4747SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4748LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...4749:... if4750INif I4751PPI may4752MDmay say4753VVsay ,4754,, General4755NPGeneral ,4756,, when4757WRBwhen you4758PPyou think4759VVPthink about4760INabout those4761DTthose statements4762NNSstatement ,4763,, I4764PPI mean4765VVPmean ,4766,, it4767PPit 's4768VBZbe just4769RBjust conclusory4770JJconclusory .4771SENT. It4772PPit 's4773VBZbe just4774RBjust like4775JJlike ,4776,, well4777RBwell ,4778,, this4779DTthis would4780MDwould eliminate4781VVeliminate the4782DTthe ...4783:... the4784DTthe ...4785:... the4786DTthe need4787NNneed for4788INfor modeling4789VVGmodel because4790INbecause we4791PPwe could4792MDcould ask4793VVask a4794DTa question4795NNquestion .4796SENT. But4797CCbut the4798DTthe question4799NNquestion is4800VBZbe ,4801,, why4802WRBwhy is4803VBZbe asking4804VVGask a4805DTa question4806NNquestion better4807RBRwell when4808WRBwhen you4809PPyou know4810VVPknow that4811IN/thatthat asking4812VVGask a4813DTa question4814NNquestion is4815VBZbe going4816VVGgo to4817TOto result4818VVresult in4819INin lots4820NNSlot of4821INof non-responses4822NNSnon-responses and4823CCand in4824INin lots4825NNSlot of4826INof false4827JJfalse reporting4828NNreporting ?4829SENT? And4830CCand so4831RBso you4832PPyou can4833MDcan 't4834RB't just4835RBjust go4836VVgo back4837RBback to4838TOto I4839PPI 'd4840MDwould rather4841RBrather ask4842VVask a4843DTa question4844NNquestion .4845SENT. You4846PPyou have4847VHPhave to4848TOto say4849VVsay why4850WRBwhy you4851PPyou 'd4852MDwould rather4853RBrather ask4854VVask a4855DTa question4856NNquestion and4857CCand what4858WPwhat benefits4859VVZbenefit it4860PPit has4861VHZhave to4862TOto ask4863VVask a4864DTa question4865NNquestion .4866SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4867LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right4868NPRight .4869SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4870LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] And4871CCand if4872INif I4873PPI may4874MDmay say4875VVsay ...4876:... I4877PPI 'll4878MDwill just4879RBjust finish4880VVfinish here4881RBhere ,4882,, General4883NPGeneral ...4884:... I4885PPI mean4886VVPmean ,4887,, a4888DTa lot4889NNlot of4890INof your4891PP$your argument4892NNargument ...4893:... your4894PP$your briefs4895NNSbrief are4896VBPbe extremely4897RBextremely well4898RBwell done4899VVNdo .4900SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4901LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Thank4902VVthank you4903PPyou .4904SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4905LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But4906CCbut a4907DTa lot4908NNlot of4909INof your4910PP$your argument4911NNargument just4912RBjust do4913VVPdo not4914RBnot appear4915VVappear in4916INin the4917DTthe Secretary4918NPSecretary 's4919POS's decision4920NNdecision memo4921NNmemo .4922SENT. And4923CCand ...4924:... and4925CCand the4926DTthe fact4927NNfact that4928IN/thatthat SG4929NPSG lawyers4930NNSlawyer can4931MDcan come4932VVcome up4933RPup with4934INwith 604935CD@card@ pages4936NNSpage of4937INof explanation4938NNexplanation for4939INfor a4940DTa decision4941NNdecision ,4942,, that4943WDTthat 's4944VBZbe all4945DTall post4946NNpost hoc4947FWhoc rationalization4948NNrationalization .4949SENT. The4950DTthe question4951NNquestion is4952VBZbe ,4953,, what4954WPwhat did4955VVDdo the4956DTthe Secretary4957NPSecretary say4958VVPsay ?4959SENT? Where4960WRBwhere did4961VVDdo he4962PPhe say4963VVPsay it4964PPit ?4965SENT? When4966WRBwhen did4967VVDdo he4968PPhe say4969VVPsay it4970PPit ?4971SENT? What4972WPWhat does4973VVZdo it4974PPit mean4975VVPmean ,4976,, other4977JJother than4978INthan just4979RBjust ipse4980JJipse dixit4981NNdixit and4982CCand conclusions4983NNSconclusion ?4984SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]4985LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure4986NPSure .4987SENT. Your4988PP$your ...4989:... Your4990PP$your Honor4991NPHonor ,4992,, I4993PPI ...4994:... I4995PPI 'm4996VBPbe tempted4997VVNtempt to4998TOto pocket4999VVpocket the5000DTthe compliment5001NNcompliment and5002CCand sit5003VVsit down5004RPdown ,5005,, but5006CCbut I5007PPI won5008MDwill 't5009RB't do5010VVdo that5011DTthat .5012SENT. [5013SYM[ LAUGHTER5014NNlaughter ]5015SYM] [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5016LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] I5017PPI think5018VVPthink the5019DTthe Secretary5020NPSecretary fully5021RBfully acknowledged5022VVDacknowledge that5023IN/thatthat there5024EXthere was5025VBDbe an5026DTan upside5027NNupside to5028TOto the5029DTthe request5030NNrequest ,5031,, and5032CCand the5033DTthe upside5034NNupside was5035VBDbe the5036DTthe one5037CDone that5038IN/thatthat the5039DTthe Department5040NPDepartment of5041INof Justice5042NPJustice set5043VVDset forth5044RBforth in5045INin its5046PP$its letter5047NNletter ,5048,, that5049IN/thatthat having5050VHGhave citizenship5051NNcitizenship data5052NNSdatum would5053MDwould help5054VVhelp improve5055VVimprove Voting5056NPVoting Rights5057NPSRights Act5058NPAct enforcement5059NNenforcement .5060SENT. He5061PPhe fully5062RBfully understood5063VVDunderstand there5064EXthere was5065VBDbe an5066DTan alternative5067NNalternative ,5068,, using5069VVGuse administrative5070JJadministrative records5071NNSrecord ,5072,, and5073CCand he5074PPhe analyzed5075VVDanalyze that5076DTthat alternative5077NNalternative in5078INin the5079DTthe language5080NNlanguage that5081IN/thatthat I5082PPI just5083RBjust read5084VVPread to5085TOto Justice5086NPJustice Breyer5087NPBreyer ,5088,, and5089CCand he5090PPhe understood5091VVDunderstand there5092EXthere was5093VBDbe a5094DTa downside5095NNdownside ,5096,, that5097IN/thatthat adding5098VVGadd the5099DTthe citizenship5100NNcitizenship question5101NNquestion would5102MDwould potentially5103RBpotentially increase5104VVincrease self-response5105NNself-response ...5106:... decrease5107NNdecrease ...5108:... increase5109VVincrease the5110DTthe number5111NNnumber of5112INof ...5113:... decrease5114VVdecrease the5115DTthe number5116NNnumber of5117INof self-response5118JJself-response rates5119NNSrate .5120SENT. But5121CCbut he5122PPhe found5123VVDfind two5124CDtwo things5125NNSthing with5126INwith respect5127NNrespect to5128TOto that5129DTthat .5130SENT. First5131RBfirst ,5132,, he5133PPhe found5134VVDfind ...5135:... and5136CCand all5137DTall of5138INof this5139DTthis is5140VBZbe in5141INin his5142PP$his letter5143NNletter ...5144:... that5145IN/thatthat he5146PPhe could5147MDcould mitigate5148VVmitigate that5149IN/thatthat to5150TOto at5151INat least5152JJSleast a5153DTa certain5154JJcertain extent5155NNextent with5156INwith follow-up5157NNfollow-up operations5158NNSoperation ,5159,, perhaps5160RBperhaps not5161RBnot entirely5162RBentirely but5163CCbut at5164INat least5165JJSleast to5166TOto a5167DTa certain5168JJcertain extent5169NNextent ,5170,, and5171CCand ,5172,, secondly5173RBsecondly ,5174,, to5175TOto the5176DTthe extent5177NNextent that5178WDTthat materialized5179VVDmaterialize ,5180,, it5181PPit was5182VBDbe the5183DTthe product5184NNproduct of5185INof illegal5186JJillegal activity5187NNactivity .5188SENT. So5189RBso he5190PPhe considered5191VVDconsider the5192DTthe benefits5193NNSbenefit .5194SENT. He5195PPhe considered5196VVDconsider the5197DTthe alternatives5198NNSalternative .5199SENT. He5200PPhe considered5201VVDconsider the5202DTthe costs5203NNScost ...5204:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5205LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Which5206WDTwhich ...5207:... which5208WDTwhich letter5209NNletter ...5210:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5211LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...5212:... and5213CCand he5214PPhe concluded5215VVDconclude that5216IN/thatthat the5217DTthe benefits5218NNSbenefit outweighed5219VVDoutweigh the5220DTthe costs5221NNScost .5222SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5223LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] General5224NPGeneral ,5225,, which5226WDTwhich letter5227NNletter are5228VBPbe we5229PPwe talking5230VVGtalk about5231RBabout ?5232SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5233LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Secretary5234NPSecretary Ross5235NPRoss 's5236POS's decision5237NNdecision memo5238NNmemo in5239INin March5240NPMarch 20185241CD@card@ ,5242,, Your5243PP$your Honor5244NPHonor .5245SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5246LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] The5247DTthe memo5248NNmemo ,5249,, not5250RBnot ...5251:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5252LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] The5253DTthe memo5254NNmemo ,5255,, yes5256UHyes ,5257,, Your5258PP$your Honor5259NPHonor .5260SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5261LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...5262:... not5263RBnot the5264DTthe letter5265NNletter from5266INfrom ...5267:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5268LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yeah5269NPYeah .5270SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5271LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...5272:... Department5273NPDepartment of5274INof Justice5275NPJustice .5276SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5277LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yes5278NPYes ,5279,, Your5280PP$your Honor5281NPHonor ,5282,, the5283DTthe memo5284NNmemo .5285SENT. But5286CCbut the5287DTthe Department5288NPDepartment of5289INof Justice5290NPJustice 's5291POS's letter5292NNletter is5293VBZbe the5294DTthe one5295CDone that5296WDTthat articulated5297VVDarticulate the5298DTthe Voting5299NPVoting Rights5300NPSRights Act5301NPAct rationale5302NNrationale that5303WDTthat formed5304VVDform ...5305:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5306LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Can5307MDcan you5308PPyou explain5309VVexplain ...5310:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5311LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...5312:... the5313DTthe principal5314JJprincipal benefit5315NNbenefit .5316SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5317LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...5318:... can5319MDcan you5320PPyou explain5321VVexplain how5322WRBhow it5323PPit would5324MDwould improve5325VVimprove Voting5326NPVoting Rights5327NPSRights Act5328NPAct enforcement5329NNenforcement ?5330SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5331LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yes5332NPYes ,5333,, Your5334PP$your Honor5335NPHonor .5336SENT. One5337CDOne of5338INof the5339DTthe critical5340JJcritical elements5341NNSelement of5342INof Voting5343NPVoting Rights5344NPSRights Act5345NPAct enforcement5346NNenforcement is5347VBZbe something5348NNsomething called5349VVNcall Citizen5350NPCitizen Voting5351NPVoting Age5352NPAge Population5353NPPopulation ,5354,, or5355CCor CVAP5356NPCVAP .5357SENT. Right5358RBright now5359RBnow ,5360,, everything5361NNeverything for5362INfor CVAP5363NPCVAP comes5364VVZcome from5365INfrom the5366DTthe census5367NNcensus ,5368,, with5369INwith the5370DTthe exception5371NNexception of5372INof citizenship5373NNcitizenship .5374SENT. So5375INso population5376NNpopulation ,5377,, age5378NNage ,5379,, race5380NNrace ,5381,, all5382DTall of5383INof that5384WDTthat comes5385VVZcome from5386INfrom the5387DTthe census5388NNcensus ,5389,, except5390INexcept for5391INfor citizenship5392NNcitizenship ,5393,, the5394DTthe C5395NPC in5396INin CVAP5397NPCVAP .5398SENT. So5399INso a5400DTa large5401JJlarge amount5402NNamount of5403INof voting5404NNvoting rights5405NNSright litigation5406NNlitigation focuses5407VVZfocus on5408INon expert5409NNexpert witnesses5410NNSwitness who5411WPwho try5412VVPtry to5413TOto fill5414VVfill in5415INin that5416DTthat missing5417VVGmiss C5418NPC and5419CCand try5420VVtry to5421TOto estimate5422VVestimate that5423IN/thatthat missing5424VVGmiss C5425NPC through5426INthrough imputation5427NNimputation based5428VVNbase on5429INon the5430DTthe American5431NPAmerican Community5432NPCommunity Survey5433NPSurvey ,5434,, which5435WDTwhich goes5436VVZgo to5437TOto just5438RBjust one5439CDone in5440INin 385441CD@card@ households5442NNShousehold .5443SENT. And5444CCand the5445DTthe Department5446NPDepartment of5447INof Justice5448NPJustice wanted5449VVDwant to5450TOto get5451VVget all5452DTall of5453INof the5454DTthe same5455JJsame information5456NNinformation from5457INfrom the5458DTthe same5459JJsame database5460NNdatabase so5461INso that5462DTthat critical5463JJcritical feature5464NNfeature of5465INof voting5466NNvoting rights5467NNSright litigation5468NNlitigation ,5469,, CVAP5470NPCVAP ,5471,, all5472DTall came5473VVDcome from5474INfrom the5475DTthe same5476JJsame place5477NNplace .5478SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5479LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] General5480NPGeneral ...5481:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]5482LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] And5483CCand to5484TOto just5485RBjust ...5486:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5487LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...5488:... how5489WRBhow do5490VVPdo we5491PPwe know5492VVPknow that5493IN/thatthat DOJ5494NPDOJ could5495MDcould n't5496RBn't do5497VVdo Alternative5498NPAlternative C5499NPC ,5500,, rely5501VVPrely on5502INon the5503DTthe administrative5504JJadministrative records5505NNSrecord ?5506SENT? The5507DTthe one5508CDone thing5509NNthing that5510IN/thatthat we5511PPwe do5512VVPdo know5513VVknow is5514VBZbe that5515IN/thatthat the5516DTthe Secretary5517NPSecretary went5518VVDgo to5519TOto the5520DTthe Department5521NPDepartment ...5522:... went5523VVDgo to5524TOto DOJ5525NPDOJ at5526INat the5527DTthe beginning5528NNbeginning and5529CCand asked5530VVDask them5531PPthem for5532INfor help5533NNhelp in5534INin adding5535VVGadd the5536DTthe citizenship5537NNcitizenship question5538NNquestion .5539SENT. They5540PPthey initially5541RBinitially said5542VVDsay no5543UHno .5544SENT. At5545INat least5546JJSleast their5547PP$their lower-level5548JJlower-level people5549NNSpeople said5550VVDsay no5551RBno ,5552,, told5553VVDtell them5554PPthem to5555TOto shop5556VVshop it5557PPit to5558TOto DHS5559NPDHS and5560CCand see5561VVsee if5562INif DHS5563NPDHS wanted5564VVDwant the5565DTthe citizenship5566NNcitizenship question5567NNquestion .5568SENT. DHS5569NNSDHS said5570VVDsay not5571RBnot our5572PP$our work5573NNwork ...5574:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5575LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Uh-huh5576NPUh-huh .5577SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5578LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...5579:... go5580VVgo back5581RBback to5582TOto DOJ5583NPDOJ .5584SENT. They5585PPthey go5586VVPgo back5587RBback to5588TOto DOJ5589NPDOJ ,5590,, the5591DTthe people5592NNSpeople they5593PPthey 're5594VBPbe in5595INin touch5596NNtouch with5597INwith ,5598,, that5599WDTthat are5600VBPbe not5601RBnot low-level5602JJlow-level ,5603,, but5604CCbut they5605PPthey 're5606VBPbe not5607RBnot the5608DTthe highest5609JJShigh level5610NNlevel ,5611,, say5612VVPsay no5613RBno .5614SENT. And5615CCand Secretary5616NPSecretary of5617INof Commerce5618NPCommerce speaks5619VVZspeak to5620TOto the5621DTthe head5622NNhead of5623INof DOJ5624NPDOJ at5625INat the5626DTthe time5627NNtime ...5628:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5629LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Uh-huh5630NPUh-huh .5631SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5632LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...5633:... and5634CCand the5635DTthe head5636NNhead of5637INof the5638DTthe DOJ5639NPDOJ says5640VVZsay :5641:: We5642PPwe 'll5643MDwill give5644VVgive you5645PPyou anything5646NNanything you5647PPyou need5648VVPneed .5649SENT. They5650PPthey do5651VVPdo a5652DTa letter5653NNletter ,5654,, the5655DTthe letter5656NNletter says5657VVZsay the5658DTthe ACS5659NPACS is5660VBZbe not5661RBnot enough5662JJenough .5663SENT. What5664WPWhat the5665DTthe letter5666NNletter does5667VVZdo n't5668RBn't say5669VVsay is5670VBZbe ,5671,, ah5672NNah ,5673,, if5674INif you5675PPyou supplemented5676VVDsupplement with5677INwith administrative5678JJadministrative records5679NNSrecord ,5680,, which5681WDTwhich 65682CD6 (5683(( c5684LSc )5685)) lets5686VVZlet you5687PPyou do5688VVPdo and5689CCand tells5690VVZtell you5691PPyou you5692PPyou should5693MDshould do5694VVdo to5695TOto maximize5696VVmaximize the5697DTthe extent5698NNextent possible5699JJpossible that5700IN/thatthat the5701DTthe actual5702JJactual count5703NNcount is5704VBZbe accurate5705JJaccurate ,5706,, and5707CCand we5708PPwe do5709VVPdo know5710VVknow that5711IN/thatthat there5712EXthere will5713MDwill be5714VBbe less5715JJRless people5716NNSpeople being5717VBGbe reported5718VVNreport ,5719,, which5720WDTwhich is5721VBZbe the5722DTthe whole5723JJwhole purpose5724NNpurpose of5725INof the5726DTthe survey5727NNsurvey ...5728:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5729LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Uh-huh5730NPUh-huh .5731SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5732LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...5733:... how5734WRBhow many5735JJmany people5736NNSpeople there5737EXthere are5738VBPbe ,5739,, and5740CCand nobody5741NNnobody doubts5742VVZdoubt that5743IN/thatthat there5744EXthere will5745MDwill be5746VBbe less5747JJRless people5748NNSpeople reported5749VVDreport .5750SENT. That5751DTthat 's5752VBZbe a5753DTa maximum5754JJmaximum need5755NNneed of5756INof the5757DTthe census5758NNcensus survey5759NNsurvey report5760NNreport ,5761,, not5762RBnot citizenship5763NNcitizenship .5764SENT. Let5765NPLet 's5766POS's not5767RBnot confuse5768VVconfuse the5769DTthe two5770CDtwo things5771NNSthing .5772SENT. The5773DTthe enumeration5774NNenumeration is5775VBZbe how5776WRBhow many5777JJmany people5778NNSpeople reside5779VVPreside here5780RBhere ,5781,, not5782RBnot how5783WRBhow many5784JJmany are5785VBPbe citizens5786NNScitizen .5787SENT. That5788DTthat 's5789VBZbe what5790WPwhat the5791DTthe census5792NNcensus survey5793NNsurvey is5794VBZbe supposed5795VVNsuppose to5796TOto figure5797VVfigure out5798RPout .5799SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5800LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Uh-huh5801NPUh-huh .5802SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5803LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] DOJ5804NPDOJ needs5805VVZneed citizenship5806NNcitizenship .5807SENT. But5808CCbut ,5809,, when5810WRBwhen the5811DTthe Bureau5812NPBureau asks5813VVZask DOJ5814NPDOJ ,5815,, not5816RBnot the5817DTthe Secretary5818NPSecretary ,5819,, to5820TOto meet5821VVmeet so5822INso they5823PPthey can5824MDcan discuss5825VVdiscuss why5826WRBwhy the5827DTthe administrative5828JJadministrative records5829NNSrecord are5830VBPbe not5831RBnot good5832JJgood enough5833RBenough ,5834,, they5835PPthey say5836VVPsay ,5837,, we5838PPwe do5839VVPdo n't5840RBn't need5841VVneed to5842TOto .5843SENT. So5844RBso tell5845VVtell me5846PPme ,5847,, in5848INin that5849DTthat sequence5850NNsequence ,5851,, how5852WRBhow does5853VVZdo the5854DTthe Secretary5855NPSecretary know5856VVPknow the5857DTthe answer5858NNanswer ...5859:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5860LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure5861NPSure .5862SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5863LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...5864:... to5865TOto that5866DTthat question5867NNquestion ?5868SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]5869LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure5870NPSure .5871SENT. So5872INso a5873DTa couple5874NNcouple of5875INof responses5876NNSresponse to5877TOto that5878DTthat ,5879,, Your5880PP$your Honor5881NPHonor .5882SENT. I5883PPI 'm5884VBPbe going5885VVGgo to5886TOto start5887VVstart with5888INwith the5889DTthe 65890CD6 (5891(( c5892LSc )5893)) issue5894VVissue because5895INbecause I5896PPI know5897VVPknow that5898WDTthat was5899VBDbe of5900INof interest5901NNinterest to5902TOto Justice5903NPJustice Breyer5904NPBreyer as5905RBas well5906RBwell .5907SENT. And5908CCand under5909INunder 65910CD6 (5911(( c5912LSc )5913)) ,5914,, under5915INunder my5916PP$my ...5917:... my5918PP$my friend5919NNfriend 's5920VBZbe on5921INon the5922DTthe other5923JJother side5924NNside 's5925POS's position5926NNposition ,5927,, you5928PPyou actually5929RBactually could5930MDcould n't5931RBn't even5932RBeven ask5933VVask the5934DTthe citizenship5935NNcitizenship question5936NNquestion on5937INon the5938DTthe American5939NPAmerican Community5940NPCommunity Survey5941NPSurvey .5942SENT. And5943CCand you5944PPyou also5945RBalso could5946MDcould n't5947RBn't ask5948VVask about5949INabout sex5950NNsex and5951CCand age5952NNage on5953INon the5954DTthe census5955NNcensus itself5956PPitself since5957INsince all5958DTall of5959INof that5960DTthat information5961NNinformation is5962VBZbe all5963DTall also5964RBalso available5965JJavailable in5966INin administrative5967JJadministrative records5968NNSrecord .5969SENT. But5970CCbut the5971DTthe reason5972NNreason why5973WRBwhy administrative5974JJadministrative records5975NNSrecord are5976VBPbe insufficient5977JJinsufficient under5978INunder 65979CD6 (5980(( c5981LSc )5982)) for5983INfor any5984DTany of5985INof these5986DTthese purposes5987NNSpurpose is5988VBZbe for5989INfor the5990DTthe simple5991JJsimple reason5992NNreason that5993IN/thatthat you5994PPyou do5995VVPdo n't5996RBn't have5997VHhave them5998PPthem for5999INfor 356000CD@card@ million6001CDmillion people6002NNSpeople .6003SENT. In6004INin terms6005NNSterm of6006INof the6007DTthe Department6008NPDepartment of6009INof Justice6010NPJustice 's6011POS's request6012NNrequest and6013CCand the6014DTthe Census6015NPCensus Bureau6016NPBureau 's6017POS's alternative6018JJalternative proposal6019NNproposal ,6020,, it6021PPit simply6022RBsimply was6023VBDbe n't6024RBn't responsive6025JJresponsive to6026TOto the6027DTthe Department6028NPDepartment of6029INof Justice6030NPJustice 's6031POS's request6032NNrequest for6033INfor two6034CDtwo reasons6035NNSreason .6036SENT. First6037RBfirst ,6038,, administrative6039JJadministrative records6040NNSrecord did6041VVDdo n't6042RBn't solve6043VVsolve the6044DTthe problem6045NNproblem that6046IN/thatthat the6047DTthe Department6048NPDepartment of6049INof Justice6050NPJustice was6051VBDbe trying6052VVGtry to6053TOto solve6054VVsolve ,6055,, which6056WDTwhich was6057VBDbe getting6058VVGget all6059DTall of6060INof their6061PP$their CVAP6062NPCVAP data6063NNSdatum from6064INfrom the6065DTthe same6066JJsame source6067NNsource and6068CCand covering6069VVGcover the6070DTthe same6071JJsame time6072NNtime period6073NNperiod .6074SENT. Administrative6075JJadministrative records6076NNSrecord come6077VVNcome from6078INfrom a6079DTa different6080JJdifferent database6081NNdatabase and6082CCand cover6083VVcover a6084DTa different6085JJdifferent time6086NNtime period6087NNperiod than6088INthan all6089DTall of6090INof the6091DTthe other6092JJother information6093NNinformation used6094VVNuse to6095TOto construct6096VVconstruct Citizen6097NPCitizen Voting6098NPVoting Age6099NPAge Population6100NPPopulation .6101SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6102LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That6103DTthat does6104VVZdo n't6105RBn't tell6106VVtell you6107PPyou why6108WRBwhy it6109PPit 's6110VBZbe not6111RBnot good6112JJgood enough6113RBenough .6114SENT. They6115PPthey may6116MDmay have6117VHhave wanted6118VVNwant something6119NNsomething .6120SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6121LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Sure6122NPSure .6123SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6124LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But6125CCbut they6126PPthey would6127MDwould then6128RBthen be6129VBbe introduced6130VVNintroduce with6131INwith one6132CDone database6133NNdatabase that6134WDTthat has6135VHZhave been6136VBNbe ,6137,, according6138VVGaccord to6139TOto the6140DTthe chief6141JJchief statistician6142NNstatistician of6143INof the6144DTthe Bureau6145NPBureau ,6146,, introducing6147VVGintroduce multiple6148JJmultiple layers6149NNSlayer of6150INof uncertainty6151NNuncertainty .6152SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6153LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right6154NPRight .6155SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6156LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Uncertainty6157NNuncertainty about6158INabout or6159CCor an6160DTan undercount6161NNundercount of6162INof people6163NNSpeople because6164INbecause they6165PPthey already6166RBalready say6167VVPsay that6168IN/thatthat undercount6169NNundercount 's6170VBZbe going6171VVGgo to6172TOto be6173VBbe at6174INat a6175DTa minimum6176JJminimum 56177CD5 .6178SENT. 86179CD8 ,6180,, less6181JJRless people6182NNSpeople are6183VBPbe going6184VVGgo to6185TOto respond6186VVrespond .6187SENT. You6188PPyou 're6189VBPbe going6190VVGgo to6191TOto have6192VHhave a6193DTa lesser6194JJRlesser number6195NNnumber that6196WDTthat are6197VBPbe going6198VVGgo to6199TOto group6200NNgroup with6201INwith the6202DTthe administrative6203JJadministrative record6204NNrecord .6205SENT. You6206PPyou 're6207VBPbe going6208VVGgo to6209TOto have6210VHhave 96211CD9 .6212SENT. 56213CD5 million6214CDmillion that6215DTthat conflict6216NNconflict between6217INbetween their6218PP$their answer6219NNanswer and6220CCand the6221DTthe administrative6222JJadministrative records6223NNSrecord .6224SENT. And6225CCand we6226PPwe have6227VHPhave to6228TOto change6229VVchange the6230DTthe bureau6231NNbureau 's6232POS's use6233NNuse of6234INof that6235DTthat information6236NNinformation to6237TOto be6238VBbe able6239JJable to6240TOto use6241VVuse the6242DTthe administrative6243JJadministrative record6244NNrecord .6245SENT. And6246CCand the6247DTthe Secretary6248NPSecretary does6249VVZdo n't6250RBn't ask6251VVask ,6252,, if6253INif we6254PPwe change6255VVPchange that6256IN/thatthat ,6257,, what6258WPwhat else6259RBelse will6260MDwill it6261PPit affect6262VVaffect ?6263SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6264LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right6265NPRight .6266SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6267LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So6268INso he6269PPhe does6270VVZdo n't6271RBn't know6272VVknow that6273DTthat .6274SENT. And6275CCand we6276PPwe now6277RBnow have6278VHPhave error6279NNerror in6280INin the6281DTthe unreporting6282JJunreporting population6283NNpopulation of6284INof at6285INat least6286JJSleast 500,0006287CD@card@ .6288SENT. So6289INso something6290NNsomething the6291DTthe chief6292JJchief statistician6293NNstatistician of6294INof the6295DTthe bureau6296NNbureau tells6297VVZtell us6298PPus is6299VBZbe ,6300,, unlike6301INunlike our6302PP$our simpler6303JJRsimple prior6304JJprior models6305NNSmodel ,6306,, this6307DTthis introduces6308VVZintroduce more6309JJRmore uncertainty6310NNuncertainty at6311INat every6312DTevery single6313JJsingle level6314NNlevel of6315INof the6316DTthe calculus6317NNcalculus .6318SENT. And6319CCand so6320RBso that6321DTthat data6322NNdata is6323VBZbe going6324VVGgo to6325TOto be6326VBbe more6327RBRmore suspect6328JJsuspect ,6329,, more6330RBRmore prone6331JJprone to6332TOto cross6333VVcross ...6334:... to6335TOto less6336JJRless reliability6337NNreliability ,6338,, and6339CCand less6340RBRless accurate6341JJaccurate .6342SENT. And6343CCand so6344RBso ,6345,, if6346INif the6347DTthe bureau6348NNbureau ...6349:... if6350INif the6351DTthe Department6352NPDepartment of6353INof Justice6354NPJustice refused6355VVDrefuse to6356TOto listen6357VVlisten to6358TOto that6359DTthat ,6360,, how6361WRBhow can6362MDcan the6363DTthe Secretary6364NPSecretary conclude6365VVPconclude that6366IN/thatthat he6367PPhe 's6368VBZbe complying6369VVGcomply with6370INwith 66371CD6 (6372(( c6373LSc )6374)) fully6375RBfully ?6376SENT? Because6377INbecause it6378PPit says6379VVZsay to6380TOto the6381DTthe maximum6382JJmaximum extent6383NNextent possible6384JJpossible ,6385,, and6386CCand how6387WRBhow can6388MDcan you6389PPyou be6390VBbe possible6391JJpossible if6392INif you6393PPyou do6394VVPdo n't6395RBn't even6396RBeven ask6397VVask why6398WRBwhy ?6399SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6400LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] So6401RBso ...6402:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6403LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] This6404DTthis seems6405VVZseem like6406INlike he6407PPhe thought6408VVDthink of6409INof something6410NNsomething ,6411,, I6412PPI want6413VVPwant to6414TOto add6415VVadd a6416DTa citizenship6417NNcitizenship question6418NNquestion ,6419,, I6420PPI do6421VVPdo n't6422RBn't know6423VVknow why6424WRBwhy ,6425,, but6426CCbut this6427DTthis is6428VBZbe a6429DTa solution6430NNsolution in6431INin search6432NNsearch of6433INof a6434DTa problem6435NNproblem .6436SENT. I6437PPI 've6438VHPhave got6439VVNget to6440TOto find6441VVfind a6442DTa problem6443NNproblem that6444WDTthat fits6445VVZfit what6446WPwhat I6447PPI want6448VVPwant to6449TOto do6450VVdo .6451SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6452LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] So6453RBso ,6454,, Your6455PP$your Honor6456NPHonor ,6457,, there6458EXthere 's6459VBZbe a6460DTa whole6461JJwhole lot6462NNlot in6463INin that6464DTthat question6465NNquestion ,6466,, but6467CCbut I6468PPI think6469VVPthink I6470PPI will6471MDwill start6472VVstart with6473INwith where6474WRBwhere you6475PPyou ended6476VVDend .6477SENT. And6478CCand if6479INif you6480PPyou really6481RBreally think6482VVPthink 66483CD6 (6484(( c6485LSc )6486)) is6487VBZbe a6488DTa problem6489NNproblem ,6490,, then6491RBthen we6492PPwe really6493RBreally cannot6494MDcan ask6495VVask the6496DTthe citizenship6497NNcitizenship question6498NNquestion on6499INon the6500DTthe American6501NPAmerican Community6502NPCommunity Survey6503NPSurvey since6504INsince that6505WDTthat is6506VBZbe just6507RBjust as6508RBas subject6509JJsubject to6510TOto 66511CD6 (6512(( c6513LSc )6514)) as6515INas the6516DTthe census6517NNcensus is6518VBZbe .6519SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6520LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] No6521NPNo ,6522,, what6523WPwhat it6524PPit says6525VVZsay ...6526:... what6527WPwhat it6528PPit says6529VVZsay is6530VBZbe to6531TOto the6532DTthe maximum6533JJmaximum extent6534NNextent possible6535JJpossible .6536SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6537LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] And6538CCand here6539RBhere the6540DTthe Secretary6541NPSecretary is6542VBZbe using6543VVGuse the6544DTthe administrative6545JJadministrative records6546NNSrecord to6547TOto the6548DTthe maximum6549JJmaximum extent6550NNextent possible6551JJpossible because6552INbecause he6553PPhe 's6554VBZbe combining6555VVGcombine them6556PPthem .6557SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6558LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But6559CCbut the6560DTthe ACS6561NPACS is6562VBZbe not6563RBnot the6564DTthe survey6565NNsurvey .6566SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6567LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] He6568PPhe 's6569VBZbe combining6570VVGcombine them6571PPthem with6572INwith the6573DTthe administrative6574JJadministrative records6575NNSrecord and6576CCand the6577DTthe self-responses6578NNSself-responses and6579CCand using6580VVGuse administrative6581JJadministrative records6582NNSrecord where6583WRBwhere they6584PPthey 're6585VBPbe available6586JJavailable ,6587,, using6588VVGuse self-responses6589NNSself-responses at6590INat 986591CD@card@ percent6592NNpercent accuracy6593NNaccuracy ...6594:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6595LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But6596CCbut the6597DTthe problem6598NNproblem ...6599:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6600LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...6601:... where6602WRBwhere administrative6603JJadministrative records6604NNSrecord are6605VBPbe not6606RBnot available6607JJavailable .6608SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6609LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...6610:... but6611CCbut the6612DTthe problem6613NNproblem is6614VBZbe you6615PPyou can6616MDcan 't6617RB't confuse6618VVconfuse the6619DTthe survey6620NNsurvey ,6621,, which6622WDTwhich is6623VBZbe really6624RBreally the6625DTthe question6626NNquestion of6627INof 66628CD6 (6629(( c6630LSc )6631)) ...6632:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6633LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] No6634NPNo .6635SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6636LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...6637:... or6638CCor the6639DTthe focus6640NNfocus .6641SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6642LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] It6643PPit 's6644VBZbe not6645RBnot .6646SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6647LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Because6648INbecause ...6649:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6650LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] 66651CD6 (6652(( c6653LSc )6654)) applies6655VVZapply to6656TOto all6657DTall census6658NNcensus instruments6659NNSinstrument ,6660,, not6661RBnot just6662RBjust the6663DTthe census6664NNcensus .6665SENT. It6666PPit fully6667RBfully applies6668VVZapply to6669TOto the6670DTthe American6671NPAmerican Community6672NPCommunity Survey6673NPSurvey .6674SENT. And6675CCand it6676PPit likewise6677RBlikewise applies6678VVZapply ...6679:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6680LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But6681CCbut the6682DTthe ACS6683NPACS is6684VBZbe not6685RBnot used6686VVNuse ...6687:... the6688DTthe ACS6689NPACS is6690VBZbe not6691RBnot used6692VVNuse for6693INfor the6694DTthe citizenship6695NNcitizenship purpose6696NNpurpose .6697SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6698LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] But6699CCbut ,6700,, Your6701PP$your Honor6702NPHonor ,6703,, your6704PP$your question6705NNquestion ...6706:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6707LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] You6708PPyou already6709RBalready said6710VVDsay why6711WRBwhy it6712PPit was6713VBDbe n't6714RBn't .6715SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6716LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...6717:... your6718PP$your question6719NNquestion is6720VBZbe about6721INabout 66722CD6 (6723(( c6724LSc )6725)) .6726SENT. 66727CD6 (6728(( c6729LSc )6730)) applies6731VVZapply to6732TOto the6733DTthe ACS6734NPACS and6735CCand it6736PPit applies6737VVZapply to6738TOto the6739DTthe census6740NNcensus .6741SENT. And6742CCand sex6743NNsex and6744CCand age6745NNage information6746NNinformation ,6747,, which6748WDTwhich we6749PPwe ask6750VVPask on6751INon the6752DTthe census6753NNcensus ,6754,, is6755VBZbe also6756RBalso available6757JJavailable in6758INin administrative6759JJadministrative records6760NNSrecord .6761SENT. Indeed6762RBindeed ,6763,, administrative6764JJadministrative records6765NNSrecord are6766VBPbe more6767RBRmore accurate6768JJaccurate with6769INwith respect6770NNrespect to6771TOto sex6772NNsex and6773CCand age6774NNage because6775INbecause ,6776,, presumably6777RBpresumably ,6778,, your6779PP$your birth6780NNbirth date6781NNdate and6782CCand your6783PP$your sex6784NNsex do6785VVPdo n't6786RBn't change6787VVchange over6788INover the6789DTthe course6790NNcourse of6791INof time6792NNtime ,6793,, whereas6794INwhereas your6795PP$your citizenship6796NNcitizenship status6797NNstatus does6798VVZdo .6799SENT. So6800RBso ,6801,, if6802INif you6803PPyou really6804RBreally think6805VVPthink that6806DTthat 66807CD6 (6808(( c6809LSc )6810)) is6811VBZbe a6812DTa problem6813NNproblem ,6814,, we6815PPwe can6816MDcan 't6817RB't ask6818VVask it6819PPit on6820INon the6821DTthe ACS6822NPACS and6823CCand we6824PPwe can6825MDcan 't6826RB't ask6827VVask sex6828NNsex and6829CCand age6830NNage on6831INon the6832DTthe census6833NNcensus ,6834,, so6835RBso that6836DTthat 's6837VBZbe why6838WRBwhy I6839PPI think6840VVPthink that6841WDTthat is6842VBZbe plainly6843RBplainly wrong6844JJwrong .6845SENT. It6846PPit really6847RBreally does6848VVZdo boil6849VVboil down6850RPdown to6851TOto whether6852INwhether the6853DTthe Secretary6854NPSecretary 's6855POS's judgment6856NNjudgment here6857RBhere is6858VBZbe a6859DTa reasonable6860JJreasonable one6861CDone .6862SENT. And6863CCand in6864INin the6865DTthe face6866NNface of6867INof two6868CDtwo competing6869VVGcompete possibilities6870NNSpossibility ,6871,, either6872CCeither asking6873VVGask the6874DTthe question6875NNquestion ,6876,, getting6877VVGget answers6878NNSanswer for6879INfor two-thirds6880NNStwo-third of6881INof the6882DTthe people6883NNSpeople for6884INfor whom6885WPwhom no6886DTno administrative6887JJadministrative records6888NNSrecord existed6889VVDexist ,6890,, at6891INat percent6892NNpercent accuracy6893NNaccuracy ,6894,, or6895CCor using6896VVGuse an6897DTan estimation6898NNestimation model6899NNmodel that6900WDTthat had6901VHDhave not6902RBnot yet6903RByet been6904VBNbe created6905VVNcreate and6906CCand had6907VHDhave an6908DTan unknown6909JJunknown error6910NNerror rate6911NNrate ,6912,, the6913DTthe Secretary6914NPSecretary reasonably6915RBreasonably chose6916VVDchoose to6917TOto go6918VVgo ...6919:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]6920LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But6921CCbut just6922RBjust ...6923:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]6924LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...6925:... with6926INwith the6927DTthe bird6928NNbird in6929INin the6930DTthe hand6931NNhand .6932SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]6933LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...6934:... General6935NPGeneral ,6936,, just6937RBjust going6938VVGgo back6939RBback to6940TOto Justice6941NPJustice Kavanaugh6942NPKavanaugh 's6943POS's simple6944JJsimple question6945NNquestion about6946INabout why6947WRBwhy the6948DTthe Secretary6949NPSecretary thought6950VVDthink that6951IN/thatthat there6952EXthere was6953VBDbe a6954DTa need6955NNneed for6956INfor this6957DTthis data6958NNSdatum ,6959,, and6960CCand then6961RBthen part6962NNpart of6963INof what6964WPwhat Justice6965NPJustice Sotomayor6966NPSotomayor was6967VBDbe talking6968VVGtalk about6969RBabout was6970VBDbe that6971IN/thatthat it6972PPit did6973VVDdo really6974RBreally seem6975VVseem like6976INlike the6977DTthe Secretary6978NPSecretary was6979VBDbe shopping6980VVGshop for6981INfor a6982DTa need6983NNneed .6984SENT. Goes6985VVZgo to6986TOto the6987DTthe Justice6988NPJustice Department6989NPDepartment .6990SENT. Justice6991NPJustice Department6992NPDepartment says6993VVZsay ,6994,, we6995PPwe do6996VVPdo n't6997RBn't need6998VVneed anything6999NNanything .7000SENT. Goes7001VVZgo to7002TOto DHS7003NPDHS .7004SENT. DHS7005NPDHS says7006VVZsay they7007PPthey do7008VVPdo n't7009RBn't need7010VVneed anything7011NNanything .7012SENT. Goes7013VVZgo back7014RBback to7015TOto the7016DTthe Justice7017NPJustice Department7018NPDepartment ,7019,, makes7020VVZmake it7021PPit clear7022JJclear that7023IN/thatthat he7024PPhe 's7025VBZbe going7026VVGgo to7027TOto put7028VVput in7029INin a7030DTa call7031NNcall to7032TOto the7033DTthe Attorney7034NPAttorney General7035NPGeneral .7036SENT. Finally7037RBfinally ,7038,, the7039DTthe Justice7040NPJustice Department7041NPDepartment comes7042VVZcome back7043RBback to7044TOto him7045PPhim and7046CCand says7047VVZsay :7048:: Okay7049JJokay ,7050,, we7051PPwe can7052MDcan give7053VVgive you7054PPyou what7055WPwhat you7056PPyou want7057VVPwant .7058SENT. So7059RBso you7060PPyou can7061MDcan 't7062RB't read7063VVDread this7064DTthis record7065NNrecord without7066INwithout sensing7067VVGsense that7068IN/thatthat this7069DTthis ...7070:... this7071DTthis need7072NNneed is7073VBZbe a7074DTa contrived7075JJcontrived one7076CDone .7077SENT. Nobody7078NNnobody had7079VHDhave ...7080:... there7081EXthere have7082VHPhave been7083VBNbe lots7084NNSlot of7085INof assistant7086JJassistant attorney7087NNattorney general7088NNgeneral in7089INin the7090DTthe Civil7091NPCivil Rights7092NPSRights Division7093NPDivision that7094WDTthat have7095VHPhave never7096RBnever made7097VVNmake a7098DTa plea7099NNplea for7100INfor this7101DTthis kind7102NNkind of7103INof data7104NNSdatum .7105SENT. And7106CCand ...7107:... and7108CCand just7109RBjust the7110DTthe way7111NNway this7112DTthis went7113VVDgo back7114RBback and7115CCand forth7116RBforth ,7117,, I7118PPI guess7119VVPguess I7120PPI 'd7121MDwould like7122VVlike an7123DTan answer7124NNanswer to7125TOto that7126DTthat simple7127NNsimple ...7128:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]7129LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Yeah7130NPYeah .7131SENT. Sure7132JJsure .7133SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7134LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...7135:... question7136NNquestion .7137SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]7138LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] And7139CCand I7140PPI have7141VHPhave two7142CDtwo responses7143NNSresponse ,7144,, Your7145PP$your Honor7146NPHonor .7147SENT. And7148CCand then7149RBthen ,7150,, if7151INif I7152PPI may7153MDmay ,7154,, I7155PPI 'd7156MDwould like7157VVlike to7158TOto reserve7159VVreserve the7160DTthe remainder7161NNremainder of7162INof my7163PP$my time7164NNtime for7165INfor rebuttal7166NNrebuttal .7167SENT. First7168RBfirst ,7169,, I7170PPI think7171VVPthink it7172PPit is7173VBZbe quite7174RBquite common7175JJcommon for7176INfor cabinet7177NNcabinet Secretaries7178NNSsecretary to7179TOto come7180VVcome into7181INinto office7182NNoffice with7183INwith ideas7184NNSidea and7185CCand inclinations7186NNSinclination to7187TOto discuss7188VVdiscuss with7189INwith their7190PP$their staff7191NNstaff and7192CCand discuss7193VVdiscuss with7194INwith their7195PP$their colleagues7196NNScolleague whether7197INwhether there7198EXthere is7199VBZbe a7200DTa legal7201JJlegal and7202CCand policy7203NNpolicy basis7204NNbasis for7205INfor that7206DTthat inclination7207NNinclination .7208SENT. Secondly7209RBsecondly ,7210,, there7211EXthere 's7212VBZbe no7213DTno evidence7214NNevidence in7215INin this7216DTthis record7217NNrecord that7218IN/thatthat the7219DTthe Secretary7220NPSecretary would7221MDwould have7222VHhave asked7223VVNask this7224DTthis question7225NNquestion had7226VHDhave the7227DTthe Department7228NPDepartment of7229INof Justice7230NPJustice not7231RBnot requested7232VVDrequest it7233PPit .7234SENT. And7235CCand there7236EXthere 's7237VBZbe no7238DTno evidence7239NNevidence in7240INin this7241DTthis record7242NNrecord that7243IN/thatthat the7244DTthe Secretary7245NPSecretary did7246VVDdo n't7247RBn't believe7248VVbelieve that7249IN/thatthat the7250DTthe Department7251NPDepartment of7252INof Justice7253NPJustice actually7254RBactually wanted7255VVDwant this7256DTthis information7257NNinformation to7258TOto improve7259VVimprove Voting7260NPVoting Rights7261NPSRights Act7262NPAct enforcement7263NNenforcement .7264SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7265LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank7266VVthank you7267PPyou ,7268,, General7269NPGeneral .7270SENT. General7271NPGeneral Underwood7272NPUnderwood .7273SENT.

[MS. UNDERWOOD]7274LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Mr7275NPMr .7276SENT. Chief7277NPChief Justice7278NPJustice ,7279,, and7280CCand may7281MDmay it7282PPit please7283VVplease the7284DTthe Court7285NPCourt :7286:: The7287DTthe Secretary7288NPSecretary decided7289VVDdecide to7290TOto add7291VVadd this7292DTthis question7293NNquestion about7294INabout citizenship7295NNcitizenship to7296TOto the7297DTthe 20207298CD@card@ census7299NNcensus although7300INalthough the7301DTthe record7302NNrecord before7303INbefore him7304PPhim contained7305VVDcontain uncontradicted7306JJuncontradicted and7307CCand strong7308JJstrong evidence7309NNevidence that7310IN/thatthat it7311PPit will7312MDwill cause7313VVcause a7314DTa decline7315NNdecline in7316INin the7317DTthe response7318NNresponse rate7319NNrate of7320INof non-citizens7321NNSnon-citizens and7322CCand Hispanics7323NNSHispanic ,7324,, to7325TOto the7326DTthe detriment7327NNdetriment of7328INof the7329DTthe states7330NNSstate and7331CCand localities7332NNSlocality where7333WRBwhere they7334PPthey live7335VVPlive .7336SENT. He7337PPhe gave7338VVDgive three7339CDthree reasons7340NNSreason for7341INfor the7342DTthe decision7343NNdecision ,7344,, and7345CCand none7346NNnone of7347INof them7348PPthem can7349MDcan survive7350VVsurvive APA7351NPAPA review7352NNreview .7353SENT. One7354CDOne ,7355,, he7356PPhe said7357VVDsay there7358EXthere was7359VBDbe inadequate7360JJinadequate evidence7361NNevidence of7362INof an7363DTan effect7364NNeffect on7365INon the7366DTthe response7367NNresponse rate7368NNrate .7369SENT. But7370CCbut that7371DTthat is7372VBZbe flatly7373RBflatly contrary7374JJcontrary to7375TOto the7376DTthe record7377NNrecord .7378SENT. He7379PPhe said7380VVDsay he7381PPhe could7382MDcould dismiss7383VVdismiss or7384CCor discount7385VVdiscount any7386DTany such7387JJsuch effect7388NNeffect because7389INbecause non-response7390NNnon-response is7391VBZbe an7392DTan illegal7393JJillegal act7394NNact .7395SENT. But7396CCbut that7397DTthat is7398VBZbe an7399DTan irrational7400JJirrational and7401CCand impermissible7402JJimpermissible factor7403NNfactor to7404TOto consider7405VVconsider on7406INon this7407DTthis question7408NNquestion .7409SENT. And7410CCand he7411PPhe said7412VVDsay that7413IN/thatthat adding7414VVGadd the7415DTthe question7416NNquestion would7417MDwould help7418VVhelp voting7419NNvoting rights7420NNSright enforcement7421NNenforcement .7422SENT. But7423CCbut that7424DTthat claim7425NNclaim is7426VBZbe unsupported7427JJunsupported by7428INby the7429DTthe record7430NNrecord as7431INas well7432RBwell .7433SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7434LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Do7435VVPdo you7436PPyou ...7437:... do7438VVPdo you7439PPyou think7440VVPthink it7441PPit would7442MDwould n't7443RBn't help7444VVhelp voting7445NNvoting rights7446NNSright enforcement7447NNenforcement ?7448SENT? The7449DTthe CVAP7450NPCVAP ,7451,, Citizen7452NPCitizen Voting7453NPVoting Age7454NPAge Population7455NPPopulation ,7456,, is7457VBZbe the7458DTthe critical7459JJcritical element7460NNelement in7461INin voting7462NNvoting rights7463NNSright enforcement7464NNenforcement ,7465,, and7466CCand this7467DTthis is7468VBZbe getting7469VVGget citizen7470NNcitizen information7471NNinformation .7472SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]7473LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well7474UHWell ,7475,, as7476INas we7477PPwe have7478VHPhave ...7479:... as7480RBas has7481VHZhave been7482VBNbe discussed7483VVNdiscuss at7484INat length7485NNlength in7486INin the7487DTthe ...7488:... during7489INduring the7490DTthe previous7491JJprevious argument7492NNargument ,7493,, the7494DTthe evidence7495NNevidence before7496INbefore him7497PPhim was7498VBDbe that7499IN/thatthat it7500PPit would7501MDwould not7502RBnot give7503VVgive better7504JJRgood citizenship7505NNcitizenship information7506NNinformation than7507INthan ...7508:... that7509IN/thatthat it7510PPit 's7511VBZbe the7512DTthe 227513CD@card@ million7514CDmillion that7515IN/thatthat the7516DTthe government7517NNgovernment points7518VVZpoint to7519TOto ,7520,, the7521DTthe 227522CD@card@ million7523CDmillion whose7524WP$whose citizenship7525NNcitizenship information7526NNinformation will7527MDwill be7528VBbe either7529RBeither modeled7530VVNmodel or7531CCor the7532DTthe result7533NNresult of7534INof the7535DTthe answer7536NNanswer to7537TOto a7538DTa census7539NNcensus question7540NNquestion .7541SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]7542LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Was7543VBDbe there7544RBthere anything7545NNanything that7546WDTthat showed7547VVDshow that7548IN/thatthat the7549DTthe Department7550NPDepartment would7551MDwould have7552VHhave been7553VBNbe aided7554VVNaid in7555INin either7556DTeither past7557JJpast cases7558NNScase or7559CCor cases7560NNScase on7561INon the7562DTthe drawing7563NNdrawing board7564NNboard ?7565SENT? Any7566DTany case7567NNcase ?7568SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]7569LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] There7570EXthere was7571VBDbe not7572RBnot .7573SENT. And7574CCand what7575WPwhat I7576PPI 'd7577MDwould like7578VVlike to7579TOto point7580VVpoint out7581RPout is7582VBZbe that7583IN/thatthat the7584DTthe comparison7585NNcomparison should7586MDshould be7587VBbe to7588TOto using7589VVGuse administrative7590JJadministrative records7591NNSrecord .7592SENT. 27593LS2 The7594DTthe Department7595NPDepartment of7596INof Justice7597NPJustice letter7598NNletter ,7599,, taken7600VVNtake at7601INat face7602NNface value7603NNvalue ,7604,, says7605VVZsay the7606DTthe old7607JJold ACS7608NPACS survey7609NNsurvey data7610NNSdatum that7611IN/thatthat we7612PPwe 've7613VHPhave been7614VBNbe using7615VVGuse is7616VBZbe inadequate7617JJinadequate and7618CCand we7619PPwe need7620VVPneed an7621DTan improvement7622NNimprovement over7623INover that7624DTthat .7625SENT. The7626DTthe Census7627NPCensus Bureau7628NPBureau produced7629VVDproduce this7630DTthis answer7631NNanswer ,7632,, which7633WDTwhich is7634VBZbe we7635PPwe can7636MDcan do7637VVdo this7638DTthis by7639INby linking7640VVGlink the7641DTthe existing7642JJexisting census7643NNcensus information7644NNinformation to7645TOto administrative7646JJadministrative records7647NNSrecord .7648SENT. The7649DTthe Department7650NPDepartment of7651INof Justice7652NPJustice never7653RBnever commented7654VVDcomment on7655INon that7656DTthat .7657SENT. The7658DTthe Department7659NPDepartment of7660INof Justice7661NPJustice actually7662RBactually declined7663VVDdecline to7664TOto meet7665VVmeet with7666INwith the7667DTthe Census7668NPCensus Bureau7669NPBureau people7670NNSpeople who7671WPwho wanted7672VVDwant to7673TOto meet7674VVmeet about7675INabout it7676PPit .7677SENT. So7678RBso there7679EXthere was7680VBDbe nothing7681NNnothing before7682INbefore the7683DTthe Secretary7684NPSecretary to7685TOto say7686VVsay that7687IN/thatthat this7688DTthis survey7689NNsurvey ...7690:... this7691DTthis census7692NNcensus information7693NNinformation would7694MDwould be7695VBbe an7696DTan improvement7697NNimprovement ...7698:... there7699EXthere was7700VBDbe no7701DTno comparison7702NNcomparison at7703INat all7704DTall from7705INfrom the7706DTthe Department7707NPDepartment of7708INof Justice7709NPJustice about7710RBabout whether7711INwhether this7712DTthis would7713MDwould be7714VBbe an7715DTan improvement7716NNimprovement or7717CCor not7718RBnot .7719SENT. It7720PPit seems7721VVZseem to7722TOto me7723PPme that7724IN/thatthat at7725INat least7726JJSleast with7727INwith so7728RBso much7729JJmuch question7730NNquestion about7731RBabout whether7732INwhether this7733DTthis information7734NNinformation would7735MDwould be7736VBbe better7737JJRgood or7738CCor worse7739JJRbad than7740INthan the7741DTthe ...7742:... the7743DTthe use7744NNuse of7745INof modeling7746VVGmodel from7747INfrom administrative7748JJadministrative records7749NNSrecord ,7750,, the7751DTthe Secretary7752NPSecretary had7753VHDhave an7754DTan obligation7755NNobligation to7756TOto find7757VVfind out7758RPout the7759DTthe answer7760NNanswer to7761TOto that7762DTthat question7763NNquestion .7764SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7765LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] What7766WPWhat if7767INif the7768DTthe answer7769NNanswer was7770VBDbe uncertain7771JJuncertain ?7772SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]7773LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well7774UHWell ,7775,, if7776INif the7777DTthe answer7778NNanswer is7779VBZbe uncertain7780JJuncertain ,7781,, then7782RBthen it7783PPit is7784VBZbe hard7785JJhard to7786TOto invoke7787VVinvoke that7788IN/thatthat as7789INas a7790DTa reason7791NNreason .7792SENT. Now7793RBnow we7794PPwe get7795VVPget back7796RBback to7797TOto the7798DTthe cost7799NNcost in7800INin the7801DTthe enumeration7802NNenumeration .7803SENT. That7804DTthat is7805VBZbe ,7806,, if7807INif the7808DTthe ...7809:... if7810INif it7811PPit 's7812VBZbe unclear7813JJunclear ...7814:... we7815PPwe think7816VVPthink it7817PPit 's7818VBZbe worse7819JJRbad .7820SENT. But7821CCbut ,7822,, if7823INif it7824PPit 's7825VBZbe just7826RBjust unclear7827JJunclear whether7828INwhether this7829DTthis question7830NNquestion will7831MDwill improve7832VVimprove voting7833NNvoting rights7834NNSright enforcement7835NNenforcement ,7836,, that7837WDTthat is7838VBZbe not7839RBnot sufficient7840JJsufficient to7841TOto pay7842VVpay the7843DTthe cost7844NNcost of7845INof the7846DTthe steep7847JJsteep decline7848NNdecline in7849INin the7850DTthe enumeration7851NNenumeration because7852INbecause the7853DTthe enumeration7854NNenumeration is7855VBZbe ,7856,, after7857INafter all7858DTall ,7859,, the7860DTthe primary7861JJprimary purpose7862NNpurpose of7863INof the7864DTthe census7865NNcensus .7866SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]7867LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well7868UHWell ,7869,, on7870INon the7871DTthe modeling7872NNmodeling ...7873:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7874LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well7875UHWell ,7876,, is7877VBZbe that7878DTthat ...7879:... go7880VVgo ahead7881RBahead .7882SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]7883LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] On7884INon the7885DTthe modeling7886NNmodeling ,7887,, there7888EXthere was7889VBDbe a7890DTa lot7891NNlot of7892INof talk7893NNtalk during7894INduring the7895DTthe first7896JJfirst part7897NNpart of7898INof the7899DTthe argument7900NNargument about7901RBabout ...7902:... I7903PPI think7904VVPthink it7905PPit 's7906VBZbe 227907CD@card@ .7908SENT. 67909CD6 million7910CDmillion people7911NNSpeople who7912WPwho it7913PPit would7914MDwould ...7915:... it7916PPit is7917VBZbe predicted7918VVNpredict would7919MDwould answer7920VVanswer the7921DTthe citizenship7922NNcitizenship question7923NNquestion and7924CCand as7925INas to7926TOto whom7927WPwhom there7928RBthere is7929VBZbe not7930RBnot administrative7931JJadministrative data7932NNSdatum .7933SENT. And7934CCand there7935EXthere was7936VBDbe an7937DTan estimate7938NNestimate that7939IN/thatthat those7940DTthose answers7941NNSanswer would7942MDwould be7943VBbe 987944CD@card@ percent7945NNpercent accurate7946JJaccurate .7947SENT. And7948CCand the7949DTthe comparison7950NNcomparison then7951RBthen has7952VHZhave to7953TOto be7954VBbe between7955INbetween that7956DTthat percent7957NNpercent predicted7958VVDpredict accuracy7959NNaccuracy rate7960NNrate and7961CCand whatever7962WDTwhatever the7963DTthe accuracy7964NNaccuracy rate7965NNrate would7966MDwould be7967VBbe for7968INfor the7969DTthe model7970NNmodel .7971SENT. And7972CCand is7973VBZbe there7974RBthere anything7975NNanything in7976INin the7977DTthe administrative7978JJadministrative record7979NNrecord that7980WDTthat shows7981VVZshow that7982IN/thatthat the7983DTthe model7984NNmodel was7985VBDbe tested7986VVNtest and7987CCand that7988IN/thatthat it7989PPit was7990VBDbe possible7991JJpossible to7992TOto extract7993VVextract a7994DTa ...7995:... a7996DTa predicted7997VVNpredict error7998NNerror rate7999NNrate for8000INfor the8001DTthe model8002NNmodel ?8003SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]8004LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] What8005WPWhat we8006PPwe have8007VHPhave ...8008:... what8009WPwhat we8010PPwe have8011VHPhave is8012VBZbe that8013IN/thatthat this8014DTthis ...8015:... the8016DTthe model8017NNmodel had8018VHDhave n't8019RBn't been8020VBNbe generated8021VVNgenerate ,8022,, but8023CCbut what8024WPwhat we8025PPwe have8026VHPhave is8027VBZbe the8028DTthe Census8029NPCensus Bureau8030NPBureau saying8031VVGsay this8032DTthis is8033VBZbe like8034INlike other8035JJother modeling8036NNmodeling that8037IN/thatthat we8038PPwe routinely8039RBroutinely do8040VVPdo .8041SENT. We8042PPwe 're8043VBPbe confident8044JJconfident that8045IN/thatthat we8046PPwe can8047MDcan do8048VVdo it8049PPit .8050SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]8051LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] So8052RBso ,8053,, if8054INif the8055DTthe Secretary8056NPSecretary said8057VVDsay ...8058:... has8059VHZhave to8060TOto choose8061VVchoose between8062INbetween two8063CDtwo things8064NNSthing ,8065,, and8066CCand ,8067,, on8068INon one8069CDone ,8070,, the8071DTthe Secretary8072NPSecretary knows8073VVZknow there8074EXthere 's8075VBZbe a8076DTa percent8077NNpercent accuracy8078NNaccuracy rate8079NNrate ,8080,, and8081CCand as8082RBas to8083TOto the8084DTthe other8085JJother ,8086,, the8087DTthe Census8088NPCensus Bureau8089NPBureau says8090VVZsay ,8091,, we8092PPwe 're8093VBPbe going8094VVGgo to8095TOto create8096VVcreate a8097DTa model8098NNmodel ,8099,, and8100CCand we8101PPwe do8102VVPdo n't8103RBn't know8104VVknow how8105WRBhow ...8106:... we8107PPwe can8108MDcan 't8109RB't give8110VVgive you8111PPyou any8112DTany statistics8113NNSstatistic ,8114,, but8115CCbut trust8116VVtrust us8117PPus ,8118,, it8119PPit 's8120VBZbe going8121VVGgo to8122TOto be8123VBbe more8124RBRmore accurate8125JJaccurate than8126INthan 988127CD@card@ percent8128NNpercent ,8129,, is8130VBZbe it8131PPit arbitrary8132JJarbitrary and8133CCand capricious8134JJcapricious for8135INfor the8136DTthe Secretary8137NPSecretary to8138TOto say8139VVsay ,8140,, I8141PPI 'll8142MDwill go8143VVgo with8144INwith the8145DTthe 988146CD@card@ percent8147NNpercent because8148INbecause that8149WDTthat 's8150VBZbe a8151DTa known8152JJknown quantity8153NNquantity ?8154SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]8155LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] If8156INif there8157EXthere were8158VBDbe no8159DTno cost8160NNcost to8161TOto the8162DTthe enumeration8163NNenumeration ,8164,, that8165WDTthat would8166MDwould be8167VBbe a8168DTa different8169JJdifferent question8170NNquestion .8171SENT. But8172CCbut ,8173,, when8174WRBwhen there8175EXthere is8176VBZbe this8177DTthis much8178JJmuch uncertainty8179NNuncertainty ,8180,, then8181RBthen it8182PPit is8183VBZbe arbitrary8184JJarbitrary and8185CCand capricious8186JJcapricious to8187TOto take8188VVtake that8189DTthat kind8190NNkind of8191INof risk8192NNrisk ...8193:... [JUSTICE BREYER]8194LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I8195PPI do8196VVPdo n't8197RBn't understand8198VVunderstand ...8199:... sorry8200JJsorry .8201SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]8202LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] ...8203:... with8204INwith the8205DTthe enumeration8206NNenumeration .8207SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8208LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I8209PPI do8210VVPdo n't8211RBn't understand8212VVunderstand uncertainty8213NNuncertainty .8214SENT. I8215PPI thought8216VVDthink the8217DTthe 988218CD@card@ percent8219NNpercent ...8220:... of8221INof course8222NNcourse ,8223,, it8224PPit 's8225VBZbe 988226CD@card@ percent8227NNpercent .8228SENT. Most8229JJSmost people8230NNSpeople are8231VBPbe citizens8232NNScitizen .8233SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]8234LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Right8235NPRight .8236SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8237LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] The8238DTthe people8239NNSpeople who8240WPwho are8241VBPbe citizens8242NNScitizen are8243VBPbe not8244RBnot going8245VVGgo to8246TOto ...8247:... you8248PPyou know8249VVPknow ,8250,, they8251PPthey 'll8252MDwill say8253VVsay they8254PPthey 're8255VBPbe citizens8256NNScitizen .8257SENT. All8258RBall you8259PPyou 'd8260MDwould ever8261RBever expect8262VVexpect are8263VBPbe a8264DTa few8265JJfew percent8266NNpercent who8267WPwho are8268VBPbe not8269RBnot citizens8270NNScitizen .8271SENT. Then8272RBthen I8273PPI have8274VHPhave on8275INon pages8276NNSpage J8277NNJ ...8278:... Joint8279JJjoint Appendix8280NPAppendix 8828281CD@card@ through8282INthrough 8848283CD@card@ Mr8284NNMr .8285SENT. Abowd8286NNAbowd 's8287POS's testimony8288NNtestimony ,8289,, where8290WRBwhere he8291PPhe unequivocally8292RBunequivocally says8293VVZsay three8294CDthree times8295NNStime that8296IN/thatthat in8297INin ...8298:... in8299INin ...8300:... not8301RBnot 988302CD@card@ percent8303NNpercent ...8304:... in8305INin respect8306NNrespect to8307TOto those8308DTthose people8309NNSpeople who8310WPwho are8311VBPbe not8312RBnot citizens8313NNScitizen ,8314,, the8315DTthe administrative8316JJadministrative model8317NNmodel will8318MDwill be8319VBbe more8320RBRmore accurate8321JJaccurate than8322INthan just8323RBjust asking8324VVGask the8325DTthe census8326NNcensus question8327NNquestion ,8328,, and8329CCand ,8330,, if8331INif you8332PPyou add8333VVPadd the8334DTthe census8335NNcensus question8336NNquestion ,8337,, then8338RBthen you8339PPyou look8340VVPlook to8341TOto it8342PPit for8343INfor the8344DTthe answer8345NNanswer ,8346,, you8347PPyou will8348MDwill discover8349VVdiscover that8350IN/thatthat you8351PPyou are8352VBPbe less8353RBRless accurate8354JJaccurate in8355INin respect8356NNrespect to8357TOto non-citizens8358NNSnon-citizens .8359SENT. Now8360RBnow he8361PPhe says8362VVZsay that8363DTthat .8364SENT. That8365DTthat 's8366VBZbe why8367WRBwhy I8368PPI asked8369VVDask the8370DTthe Solicitor8371NPSolicitor General8372NPGeneral what8373WPwhat is8374VBZbe their8375PP$their contrary8376NNcontrary to8377TOto that8378DTthat ,8379,, and8380CCand he8381PPhe gave8382VVDgive me8383PPme things8384NNSthing to8385TOto look8386VVlook at8387INat .8388SENT. And8389CCand I8390PPI would8391MDwould say8392VVsay the8393DTthe most8394RBSmost contrary8395JJcontrary thing8396NNthing ,8397,, which8398WDTwhich I8399PPI want8400VVPwant to8401TOto ask8402VVask you8403PPyou about8404RBabout ,8405,, is8406VBZbe Dr8407NNDr .8408SENT. Abowd8409RBAbowd ,8410,, at8411INat the8412DTthe trial8413NNtrial ,8414,, said8415VVDsay ,8416,, "8417``" There8418EXthere 's8419VBZbe no8420DTno credible8421JJcredible quantitative8422JJquantitative evidence8423NNevidence that8424IN/thatthat the8425DTthe addition8426NNaddition of8427INof a8428DTa citizenship8429NNcitizenship question8430NNquestion will8431MDwill affect8432VVaffect the8433DTthe accuracy8434NNaccuracy of8435INof the8436DTthe count8437NNcount .8438SENT. "8439''" All8440DTall right8441NNright ?8442SENT? That8443DTthat 's8444VBZbe what8445WPwhat he8446PPhe said8447VVDsay .8448SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]8449LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Yes8450NPYes .8451SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8452LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Now8453RBnow I8454PPI 'm8455VBPbe sure8456JJsure in8457INin their8458PP$their reply8459NNreply brief8460NNbrief they8461PPthey pointed8462VVDpoint right8463RBright to8464TOto that8465DTthat .8466SENT. You8467PPyou can8468MDcan 't8469RB't simply8470RBsimply ignore8471VVignore it8472PPit .8473SENT. And8474CCand so8475RBso I8476PPI want8477VVPwant to8478TOto hear8479VVhear what8480WPwhat your8481PP$your answer8482NNanswer is8483VBZbe to8484TOto that8485WDTthat ,8486,, which8487WDTwhich the8488DTthe government8489NNgovernment says8490VVZsay is8491VBZbe contrary8492JJcontrary evidence8493NNevidence .8494SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]8495LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] If8496INif you8497PPyou look8498VVPlook at8499INat that8500DTthat testimony8501NNtestimony in8502INin context8503NNcontext ,8504,, it8505PPit is8506VBZbe perfectly8507RBperfectly clear8508JJclear that8509IN/thatthat what8510WPwhat he8511PPhe is8512VBZbe saying8513VVGsay is8514VBZbe that8515IN/thatthat he8516PPhe did8517VVDdo n't8518RBn't have8519VHhave enough8520JJenough evidence8521NNevidence for8522INfor a8523DTa firm8524JJfirm quantitative8525JJquantitative statement8526NNstatement ,8527,, meeting8528VVGmeet scientific8529JJscientific standards8530NNSstandard .8531SENT. He8532PPhe actually8533RBactually defined8534VVDdefine the8535DTthe term8536NNterm "8537``" credible8538JJcredible quantitative8539JJquantitative evidence8540NNevidence .8541SENT. "8542''" And8543CCand if8544INif you8545PPyou 'll8546MDwill bear8547VVbear with8548INwith me8549PPme ,8550,, he8551PPhe ...8552:... he8553PPhe said8554VVDsay it8555PPit 's8556VBZbe evidence8557NNevidence that8558WDTthat is8559VBZbe specifically8560RBspecifically related8561VVNrelate to8562TOto the8563DTthe insertion8564NNinsertion of8565INof a8566DTa citizenship8567NNcitizenship question8568NNquestion into8569INinto the8570DTthe otherwise8571RBotherwise planned8572VVNplan 20208573CD@card@ census8574NNcensus that8575WDTthat identifies8576VVZidentify the8577DTthe citizenship8578NNcitizenship question8579VVPquestion itself8580PPitself as8581INas the8582DTthe likely8583JJlikely or8584CCor one8585CDone of8586INof the8587DTthe causal8588JJcausal elements8589NNSelement associated8590VVNassociate with8591INwith changes8592NNSchange in8593INin the8594DTthe outcomes8595NNSoutcome and8596CCand that8597WDTthat would8598MDwould stand8599VVstand up8600RPup to8601TOto extensive8602JJextensive peer8603NNpeer review8604NNreview within8605INwithin the8606DTthe Census8607NPCensus Bureau8608NPBureau and8609CCand with8610INwith the8611DTthe scientific8612JJscientific community8613NNcommunity .8614SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]8615LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] That8616DTthat ...8617:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]8618LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] And8619CCand ...8620:... and8621CCand the8622DTthe ...8623:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]8624LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] ...8625:... that8626WDTthat 's8627VBZbe the8628DTthe evidence8629NNevidence that8630IN/thatthat he8631PPhe found8632VVDfind was8633VBDbe not8634RBnot available8635JJavailable ?8636SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]8637LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Yes8638NPYes ,8639,, that8640WDTthat 's8641VBZbe right8642JJright .8643SENT. He8644PPhe said8645VVDsay he8646PPhe did8647VVDdo n't8648RBn't have8649VHhave enough8650JJenough to8651TOto quantify8652VVquantify accord8653NNaccord ...8654:... in8655INin accordance8656NNaccordance with8657INwith peer-reviewed8658JJpeer-reviewed standards8659NNSstandard .8660SENT. He8661PPhe did8662VVDdo n't8663RBn't say8664VVsay there8665EXthere would8666MDwould be8667VBbe no8668DTno effect8669NNeffect .8670SENT. He8671PPhe said8672VVDsay ,8673,, I8674PPI do8675VVPdo n't8676RBn't have8677VHhave enough8678JJenough to8679TOto give8680VVgive what8681WPwhat I8682PPI ...8683:... what8684WPwhat I8685PPI believe8686VVPbelieve as8687INas a8688DTa scientist8689NNscientist to8690TOto be8691VBbe this8692DTthis term8693NNterm ,8694,, "8695''" credible8696JJcredible quantitative8697JJquantitative "8698''" ...8699:... to8700TOto make8701VVmake credible8702JJcredible quantitative8703JJquantitative evidence8704NNevidence .8705SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8706LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Can8707MDcan ...8708:... can8709MDcan I8710PPI ask8711VVask ...8712:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]8713LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] So8714INso he8715PPhe is8716VBZbe ...8717:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8718LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I8719PPI 'm8720VBPbe sorry8721JJsorry ,8722,, please8723VVplease finish8724NNfinish .8725SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]8726LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] And8727CCand ...8728:... and8729CCand my8730PP$my point8731NNpoint is8732VBZbe that8733IN/thatthat ,8734,, at8735INat the8736DTthe same8737JJsame trial8738NNtrial ,8739,, if8740INif we8741PPwe 're8742VBPbe going8743VVGgo to8744TOto look8745VVlook at8746INat the8747DTthe trial8748NNtrial testimony8749NNtestimony ,8750,, at8751INat the8752DTthe same8753JJsame trial8754NNtrial ,8755,, other8756JJother experts8757NNSexpert said8758VVDsay :8759:: Maybe8760RBmaybe so8761RBso ,8762,, but8763CCbut there8764EXthere is8765VBZbe enough8766RBenough evidence8767NNevidence to8768TOto make8769VVmake a8770DTa different8771JJdifferent kind8772NNkind of8773INof judgment8774NNjudgment ,8775,, not8776RBnot a8777DTa firm8778NNfirm scientific8779JJscientific ,8780,, quantified8781VVNquantify judgment8782NNjudgment ,8783,, but8784CCbut a8785DTa judgment8786NNjudgment .8787SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]8788LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Do8789VVPdo you8790PPyou think8791VVPthink it8792PPit 's8793VBZbe proper8794JJproper to8795TOto look8796VVlook at8797INat the8798DTthe trial8799NNtrial record8800NNrecord on8801INon this8802DTthis issue8803NNissue ?8804SENT? There8805EXthere 's8806VBZbe a8807DTa lot8808NNlot of8809INof citation8810NNcitation in8811INin the8812DTthe Respondents8813NNSrespondent '8814POS' brief8815NNbrief to8816TOto trial8817NNtrial testimony8818NNtestimony .8819SENT. Are8820VBPbe n't8821RBn't we8822PPwe reviewing8823VVGreview the8824DTthe administrative8825JJadministrative record8826NNrecord ?8827SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]8828LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] We8829PPwe are8830VBPbe .8831SENT. Well8832UHwell ,8833,, as8834RBas for8835INfor standing8836NNstanding ,8837,, we8838PPwe 're8839VBPbe reviewing8840VVGreview the8841DTthe whole8842JJwhole record8843NNrecord .8844SENT. And8845CCand as8846RBas ...8847:... [JUSTICE ALITO]8848LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] That8849DTthat 's8850VBZbe correct8851JJcorrect .8852SENT. But8853CCbut as8854INas to8855TOto the8856DTthe arbitrary8857JJarbitrary and8858CCand capricious8859JJcapricious review8860NNreview ...8861:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]8862LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Correct8863JJcorrect .8864SENT. That's8865NNSThat's ...8866:... that8867DTthat ...8868:... that8869WDTthat is8870VBZbe correct8871JJcorrect ,8872,, but8873CCbut that8874WDTthat would8875MDwould make8876VVmake this8877DTthis statement8878NNstatement also8879RBalso of8880INof Dr8881NPDr .8882SENT. Abowd8883NNSAbowd off8884INoff the8885DTthe record8886NNrecord ,8887,, off8888INoff the8889DTthe administrative8890JJadministrative record8891NNrecord .8892SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8893LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Can8894MDcan I8895PPI ...8896:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]8897LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] But8898CCbut what8899WPwhat I8900PPI ...8901:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8902LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...8903:... can8904MDcan I8905PPI ask8906VVask a8907DTa ...8908:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]8909LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Yes8910NPYes .8911SENT. Please8912UHPlease .8913SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8914LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Please8915RBplease finish8916VVfinish .8917SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]8918LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] No8919NPNo ,8920,, going8921VVGgo ...8922:... going8923VVGgo ...8924:... going8925VVGgo back8926RBback to8927TOto your8928PP$your question8929NNquestion ...8930:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]8931LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Wait8932VVwait a8933DTa minute8934NNminute ,8935,, Justice8936NPJustice Kavanaugh8937NPKavanaugh .8938SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]8939LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] ...8940:... while8941INwhile I8942PPI think8943VVPthink there8944EXthere is8945VBZbe good8946JJgood evidence8947NNevidence ,8948,, and8949CCand nothing8950NNnothing contrary8951NNcontrary ,8952,, that8953IN/thatthat this8954DTthis 228955CD@card@ million8956CDmillion would8957MDwould be8958VBbe more8959RBRmore accurately8960RBaccurately identified8961VVNidentify by8962INby the8963DTthe modeling8964NNmodeling than8965INthan by8966INby the8967DTthe census8968NNcensus ,8969,, I8970PPI think8971VVPthink it8972PPit is8973VBZbe sufficient8974JJsufficient for8975INfor this8976DTthis purpose8977NNpurpose to8978TOto treat8979VVtreat it8980PPit as8981INas somewhat8982RBsomewhat uncertain8983JJuncertain ,8984,, because8985INbecause it8986PPit is8987VBZbe uncertainty8988NNuncertainty with8989INwith respect8990NNrespect to8991TOto the8992DTthe discretionary8993JJdiscretionary part8994NNpart of8995INof what8996WPwhat the8997DTthe Census8998NPCensus Bureau8999NPBureau does9000VVZdo ;9001:; namely9002RBnamely ,9003,, collect9004VVPcollect extra9005JJextra information9006NNinformation .9007SENT. The9008DTthe core9009JJcore function9010NNfunction of9011INof the9012DTthe census9013NNcensus ,9014,, not9015RBnot of9016INof the9017DTthe Census9018NPCensus Bureau9019NPBureau in9020INin all9021PDTall its9022PP$its actions9023NNSaction ,9024,, but9025CCbut of9026INof ...9027:... on9028INon the9029DTthe census9030NNcensus form9031NNform ...9032:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9033LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But9034CCbut the9035DTthe ...9036:... the9037DTthe United9038NPUnited Nations9039NPSNations recommends9040VVZrecommend that9041IN/thatthat countries9042NNScountry ask9043VVPask a9044DTa citizenship9045NNcitizenship question9046NNquestion on9047INon the9048DTthe census9049NNcensus .9050SENT. And9051CCand a9052DTa number9053NNnumber of9054INof other9055JJother countries9056NNScountry do9057VVPdo it9058PPit .9059SENT. Spain9060NPSpain ,9061,, Germany9062NPGermany ,9063,, Canada9064NPCanada ,9065,, Australia9066NPAustralia ,9067,, Ireland9068NPIreland ,9069,, Mexico9070NPMexico ask9071VVPask a9072DTa citizenship9073NNcitizenship question9074NNquestion .9075SENT. And9076CCand the9077DTthe United9078NPUnited States9079NPSStates has9080VHZhave asked9081VVNask a9082DTa citizenship9083NNcitizenship question9084NNquestion ,9085,, as9086INas you9087PPyou know9088VVPknow ,9089,, in9090INin one9091CDone form9092NNform or9093CCor another9094DTanother since9095INsince 18209096CD@card@ ,9097,, excluding9098VVGexclude 18409099CD@card@ ,9100,, and9101CCand ,9102,, again9103RBagain ,9104,, long9105JJlong form9106NNform at9107INat times9108NNStime ,9109,, in9110INin more9111JJRmore recent9112JJrecent times9113NNStime ,9114,, and9115CCand then9116RBthen on9117INon the9118DTthe ACS9119NPACS since9120INsince 20059121CD@card@ .9122SENT. The9123DTthe question9124NNquestion is9125VBZbe ,9126,, does9127VVZdo that9128IN/thatthat international9129JJinternational practice9130NNpractice ,9131,, that9132DTthat U9133NPU .9134SENT. N9135NPN .9136SENT. recommendation9137NNrecommendation ,9138,, that9139DTthat historical9140JJhistorical practice9141NNpractice in9142INin the9143DTthe United9144NPUnited States9145NPStates ,9146,, affect9147VVPaffect how9148WRBhow we9149PPwe should9150MDshould look9151VVlook at9152INat the9153DTthe inclusion9154NNinclusion of9155INof a9156DTa citizenship9157NNcitizenship question9158NNquestion in9159INin this9160DTthis case9161NNcase ?9162SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]9163LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] The9164DTthe same9165JJsame guidance9166NNguidance from9167INfrom the9168DTthe U9169NPU .9170SENT. N9171NPN .9172SENT. also9173RBalso says9174VVZsay to9175TOto be9176VBbe careful9177JJcareful to9178TOto test9179VVtest questions9180NNSquestion to9181TOto make9182VVmake sure9183JJsure they9184PPthey do9185VVPdo n't9186RBn't interfere9187VVinterfere with9188INwith the9189DTthe enumeration9190NNenumeration .9191SENT. It9192PPit says9193VVZsay you9194PPyou need9195VVPneed to9196TOto make9197VVmake a9198DTa judgment9199NNjudgment in9200INin context9201NNcontext .9202SENT. It9203PPit may9204MDmay be9205VBbe that9206IN/thatthat those9207DTthose countries9208NNScountry either9209RBeither have9210VHPhave n't9211RBn't examined9212VVNexamine or9213CCor do9214VVPdo n't9215RBn't have9216VHhave the9217DTthe problem9218NNproblem that9219WDTthat has9220VHZhave been9221VBNbe identified9222VVNidentify ...9223:... the9224DTthe problem9225NNproblem of9226INof depressing9227VVGdepress the9228DTthe enumeration9229NNenumeration that9230IN/thatthat the9231DTthe United9232NPUnited States9233NPSStates has9234VHZhave .9235SENT. It9236PPit 's9237VBZbe certainly9238RBcertainly something9239NNsomething to9240TOto look9241VVlook at9242INat ,9243,, but9244CCbut ...9245:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9246LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But9247CCbut you9248PPyou agree9249VVPagree it9250PPit 's9251VBZbe very9252RBvery ...9253:... it9254PPit 's9255VBZbe a9256DTa very9257RBvery common9258JJcommon question9259NNquestion internationally9260RBinternationally ?9261SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]9262LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well9263UHwell ,9264,, it9265PPit is9266VBZbe certainly9267RBcertainly useful9268JJuseful information9269NNinformation for9270INfor a9271DTa country9272NNcountry to9273TOto have9274VHhave .9275SENT. And9276CCand I9277PPI 'm9278VBPbe not9279RBnot suggesting9280VVGsuggest at9281INat all9282PDTall that9283IN/thatthat that9284DTthat information9285NNinformation should9286MDshould n't9287RBn't be9288VBbe collected9289VVNcollect .9290SENT. The9291DTthe question9292NNquestion is9293VBZbe whether9294INwhether it9295PPit should9296MDshould be9297VBbe collected9298VVNcollect on9299INon the9300DTthe very9301JJvery instrument9302NNinstrument that9303WDTthat is9304VBZbe ...9305:... whose9306WP$whose principal9307JJprincipal function9308NNfunction is9309VBZbe to9310TOto count9311VVcount the9312DTthe population9313NNpopulation ,9314,, when9315WRBwhen we9316PPwe have9317VHPhave such9318JJsuch strong9319JJstrong evidence9320NNevidence that9321IN/thatthat it9322PPit will9323MDwill depress9324VVdepress that9325DTthat count9326NNcount ,9327,, make9328VVmake it9329PPit less9330RBRless accurate9331JJaccurate ,9332,, and9333CCand make9334VVmake it9335PPit less9336RBRless accurate9337JJaccurate in9338INin a9339DTa ...9340:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9341LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well9342UHWell ,9343,, the9344DTthe principal9345JJprincipal purpose9346NNpurpose ...9347:... you9348PPyou 're9349VBPbe ...9350:... you9351PPyou 're9352VBPbe right9353JJright ,9354,, the9355DTthe principal9356JJprincipal purpose9357NNpurpose is9358VBZbe to9359TOto count9360VVcount the9361DTthe population9362NNpopulation ,9363,, but9364CCbut we9365PPwe 've9366VHPhave had9367VHDhave demographic9368JJdemographic questions9369NNSquestion on9370INon the9371DTthe census9372NNcensus ...9373:... I9374PPI do9375VVPdo n't9376RBn't know9377VVknow how9378WRBhow far9379RBfar back9380RBback ,9381,, but9382CCbut ,9383,, certainly9384RBcertainly ,9385,, it9386PPit 's9387VBZbe quite9388RBquite common9389JJcommon .9390SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]9391LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] That's9392NPThat's ...9393:... that9394WDTthat 's9395VBZbe correct9396JJcorrect ,9397,, but9398CCbut we9399PPwe have9400VHPhave no9401DTno evidence9402NNevidence about9403RBabout ...9404:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9405LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Sex9406NNsex ,9407,, age9408NNage ,9409,, things9410NNSthing like9411INlike that9412DTthat .9413SENT. You9414PPyou go9415VVPgo back9416RBback and9417CCand it9418PPit looks9419VVZlook ...9420:... you9421PPyou know9422VVPknow ,9423,, do9424VVPdo you9425PPyou ...9426:... do9427VVPdo you9428PPyou own9429VVPown your9430PP$your house9431NNhouse ?9432SENT? Do9433VVdo you9434PPyou own9435VVown a9436DTa radio9437NNradio ?9438SENT? I9439PPI mean9440VVPmean ,9441,, the9442DTthe questions9443NNSquestion go9444VVPgo quite9445RBquite beyond9446INbeyond how9447WRBhow many9448JJmany people9449NNSpeople there9450RBthere are9451VBPbe .9452SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]9453LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well9454UHwell ,9455,, I9456PPI 'd9457MDwould like9458VVlike to9459TOto say9460VVsay two9461CDtwo things9462NNSthing about9463INabout that9464DTthat .9465SENT. We9466PPwe have9467VHPhave no9468DTno comparable9469JJcomparable evidence9470NNevidence about9471INabout any9472DTany of9473INof those9474DTthose other9475JJother questions9476NNSquestion that9477IN/thatthat they9478PPthey depress9479VVPdepress the9480DTthe count9481NNcount in9482INin this9483DTthis substantial9484JJsubstantial a9485DTa way9486NNway and9487CCand in9488INin this9489DTthis disproportionate9490JJdisproportionate a9491DTa way9492NNway because9493INbecause ,9494,, as9495INas this9496DTthis Court9497NPCourt said9498VVDsay in9499INin Wisconsin9500NPWisconsin ,9501,, distributive9502JJdistributive accuracy9503NNaccuracy is9504VBZbe even9505RBeven more9506RBRmore important9507JJimportant for9508INfor the9509DTthe census9510NNcensus .9511SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]9512LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well9513UHWell ,9514,, the9515DTthe ...9516:... the9517DTthe ...9518:... the9519DTthe response9520NNresponse rate9521NNrate is9522VBZbe very9523RBvery important9524JJimportant ,9525,, so9526RBso can9527MDcan I9528PPI ask9529VVask you9530PPyou a9531DTa question9532NNquestion about9533INabout that9534DTthat ?9535SENT? A9536DTa lot9537NNlot of9538INof your9539PP$your argument9540NNargument and9541CCand a9542DTa lot9543NNlot of9544INof the9545DTthe district9546NNdistrict court9547NNcourt 's9548POS's argument9549NNargument seems9550VVZseem to9551TOto hinge9552VVhinge on9553INon this9554DTthis prediction9555NNprediction that9556IN/thatthat there9557EXthere will9558MDwill be9559VBbe 59560CD5 .9561SENT. 19562CD1 percent9563NNpercent fewer9564JJRfew responses9565NNSresponse if9566INif the9567DTthe citizenship9568NNcitizenship question9569NNquestion is9570VBZbe included9571VVNinclude on9572INon the9573DTthe census9574NNcensus .9575SENT. But9576CCbut that9577DTthat seems9578VVZseem ...9579:... that9580WDTthat is9581VBZbe based9582VVNbase ,9583,, as9584INas I9585PPI understand9586VVPunderstand it9587PPit ,9588,, on9589INon the9590DTthe fact9591NNfact that9592IN/thatthat non-citizens9593NNSnon-citizens are9594VBPbe somewhat9595RBsomewhat less9596RBRless likely9597JJlikely to9598TOto complete9599VVcomplete the9600DTthe ACS9601NPACS ,9602,, which9603WDTwhich includes9604VVZinclude the9605DTthe citizenship9606NNcitizenship question9607NNquestion ,9608,, than9609INthan are9610VBPbe citizens9611NNScitizen .9612SENT. Am9613VBPbe I9614PPI right9615JJright in9616INin understanding9617VVGunderstand that9618DTthat ?9619SENT? That9620DTthat 's9621VBZbe fundamentally9622RBfundamentally where9623WRBwhere that9624DTthat comes9625VVZcome from9626INfrom ?9627SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]9628LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] It9629PPit 's9630VBZbe not9631RBnot about9632RBabout not9633RBnot completing9634VVGcomplete .9635SENT. It9636PPit 's9637VBZbe about9638RBabout not9639RBnot ...9640:... I9641PPI mean9642VVPmean ,9643,, it9644PPit 's9645VBZbe not9646RBnot about9647RBabout skipping9648VVGskip questions9649NNSquestion on9650INon a9651DTa form9652NNform .9653SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]9654LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Not9655RBnot ...9656:... not9657RBnot responding9658VVGrespond .9659SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]9660LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] It9661PPit 's9662VBZbe about9663RBabout not9664RBnot ...9665:... not9666RBnot responding9667VVGrespond .9668SENT. Yes9669UHyes .9670SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]9671LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] That9672DTthat 's9673VBZbe correct9674JJcorrect .9675SENT. Okay9676JJokay .9677SENT. They9678PPthey 're9679VBPbe somewhat9680RBsomewhat less9681RBRless likely9682JJlikely to9683TOto respond9684VVrespond to9685TOto the9686DTthe ACS9687NPACS than9688INthan are9689NNare ...9690:... than9691INthan are9692VBPbe ...9693:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]9694LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] It9695PPit 's9696VBZbe the9697DTthe ACS9698NPACS in9699INin one9700CDone study9701NNstudy and9702CCand the9703DTthe long9704JJlong form9705NNform in9706INin another9707DTanother .9708SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]9709LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Okay9710NPOkay .9711SENT. But9712CCbut what9713WPwhat jumps9714VVZjump out9715RBout is9716VBZbe the9717DTthe fact9718NNfact that9719IN/thatthat citizens9720NNScitizen and9721CCand non-citizens9722NNSnon-citizens differ9723VVPdiffer in9724INin a9725DTa lot9726NNlot of9727INof respects9728NNSrespect other9729JJother than9730INthan citizenship9731NNcitizenship .9732SENT. They9733PPthey differ9734VVPdiffer in9735INin socioeconomic9736JJsocioeconomic status9737NNstatus .9738SENT. They9739PPthey differ9740VVPdiffer in9741INin education9742NNeducation .9743SENT. They9744PPthey differ9745VVPdiffer in9746INin language9747NNlanguage ability9748NNability .9749SENT. So9750RBso I9751PPI do9752VVPdo n't9753RBn't think9754VVthink you9755PPyou have9756VHPhave to9757TOto be9758VBbe much9759JJmuch of9760INof a9761DTa statistician9762NNstatistician to9763TOto wonder9764VVwonder about9765INabout the9766DTthe legitimacy9767NNlegitimacy of9768INof concluding9769VVGconclude that9770IN/thatthat there9771EXthere 's9772VBZbe going9773VVGgo to9774TOto be9775VBbe a9776DTa 59777CD5 .9778SENT. 19779CD1 percent9780NNpercent lower9781JJRlow response9782NNresponse rate9783NNrate because9784INbecause of9785INof this9786DTthis one9787CDone factor9788NNfactor .9789SENT. But9790CCbut maybe9791RBmaybe there9792EXthere 's9793VBZbe something9794RBsomething more9795RBRmore there9796RBthere .9797SENT. So9798RBso what9799WPwhat ...9800:... what9801WPwhat does9802VVZdo that9803IN/thatthat analysis9804NNanalysis miss9805NNmiss ?9806SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]9807LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] The9808DTthe strong9809JJstrong ...9810:... well9811RBwell ,9812,, a9813DTa couple9814NNcouple of9815INof things9816NNSthing .9817SENT. The9818DTthe strong9819JJstrong empirical9820JJempirical evidence9821NNevidence that9822WDTthat is9823VBZbe the9824DTthe basis9825NNbasis for9826INfor that9827DTthat judgment9828NNjudgment ,9829,, which9830WDTwhich ,9831,, by9832INby the9833DTthe way9834NNway ,9835,, has9836VHZhave not9837RBnot been9838VBNbe contested9839VVNcontest by9840INby the9841DTthe government9842NNgovernment ,9843,, the9844DTthe government9845NNgovernment has9846VHZhave other9847JJother things9848NNSthing to9849TOto say9850VVsay but9851CCbut does9852VVZdo not9853RBnot contest9854VVcontest this9855DTthis decline9856NNdecline ...9857:... [JUSTICE ALITO]9858LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] I9859PPI thought9860VVDthink they9861PPthey did9862VVDdo ,9863,, but9864CCbut ,9865,, in9866INin any9867DTany event9868NNevent ,9869,, go9870VVgo ahead9871RBahead .9872SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]9873LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] I9874PPI 'll9875MDwill come9876VVcome back9877RBback to9878TOto that9879DTthat ...9880:... is9881VBZbe a9882DTa ...9883:... is9884VBZbe a9885DTa retrospective9886JJretrospective review9887NNreview of9888INof comparing9889VVGcompare in9890INin one9891CDone case9892NNcase for9893INfor 20109894CD@card@ the9895DTthe short-form9896NNshort-form census9897NNcensus and9898CCand the9899DTthe ACS9900NPACS ,9901,, and9902CCand in9903INin 20009904CD@card@ ,9905,, it9906PPit was9907VBDbe to9908TOto compare9909VVcompare the9910DTthe short9911JJshort form9912NNform and9913CCand the9914DTthe long-form9915NNlong-form census9916NNcensus .9917SENT. It9918PPit 's9919VBZbe a9920DTa comparable9921JJcomparable comparison9922NNcomparison .9923SENT. In9924INin each9925DTeach case9926NNcase ,9927,, the9928DTthe longer9929RBRlonger one9930PPone had9931VHDhave a9932DTa citizenship9933NNcitizenship question9934NNquestion on9935INon it9936PPit .9937SENT. In9938INin each9939DTeach case9940NNcase ,9941,, everyone9942NNeveryone ,9943,, population9944NNpopulation groups9945NNSgroup notwithstanding9946RBnotwithstanding ,9947,, there9948EXthere was9949VBDbe a9950DTa decline9951NNdecline from9952INfrom the9953DTthe short9954JJshort form9955NNform to9956TOto the9957DTthe long9958JJlong form9959NNform .9960SENT. But9961CCbut there9962EXthere was9963VBDbe a9964DTa much9965RBmuch greater9966JJRgreat decline9967NNdecline among9968INamong Hispanics9969NNSHispanic and9970CCand non-citizens9971NNSnon-citizens .9972SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9973LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] But9974NPBut ,9975,, counsel9976NNcounsel ,9977,, is9978VBZbe n't9979RBn't ...9980:... does9981VVZdo n't9982RBn't Justice9983NPJustice Alito9984NPAlito have9985VHPhave a9986DTa point9987NNpoint to9988TOto the9989DTthe extent9990NNextent that9991IN/thatthat there9992EXthere could9993MDcould be9994VBbe multiple9995JJmultiple reasons9996NNSreason why9997WRBwhy individuals9998NNSindividual do9999VVPdo n't10000RBn't complete10001VVcomplete the10002DTthe form10003NNform ?10004SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]10005LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well10006UHWell ,10007,, the10008DTthe lay10009NNlay ...10010:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10011LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] And10012CCand we10013PPwe have10014VHPhave n't10015RBn't ...10016:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10017LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] I10018PPI 'm10019VBPbe sorry10020JJsorry ,10021,, go10022VVgo ahead10023RBahead .10024SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10025LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Plenty10026NPPlenty of10027INof interrupting10028VVGinterrupt .10029SENT. But10030CCbut we10031PPwe do10032VVPdo n't10033RBn't have10034VHhave any10035DTany evidence10036NNevidence disaggregating10037VVGdisaggregating the10038DTthe reasons10039NNSreason why10040WRBwhy the10041DTthe forms10042NNSform are10043VBPbe left10044RBleft uncompleted10045JJuncompleted .10046SENT. What10047WPWhat do10048VVPdo we10049PPwe do10050VVPdo with10051INwith that10052DTthat ?10053SENT? I10054PPI mean10055VVPmean ,10056,, normally10057RBnormally ,10058,, we10059PPwe 'd10060MDwould have10061VHhave a10062DTa regression10063NNregression analysis10064NNanalysis that10065WDTthat would10066MDwould disaggregate10067VVdisaggregate the10068DTthe potential10069JJpotential causes10070NNScause and10071CCand identify10072VVidentify to10073TOto a10074DTa 95th10075JJ95th percentile10076NNpercentile degree10077NNdegree of10078INof certainty10079NNcertainty what10080WPwhat the10081DTthe reason10082NNreason is10083VBZbe that10084IN/thatthat persons10085NNSperson are10086VBPbe not10087RBnot filling10088VVGfill out10089RPout this10090DTthis form10091NNform and10092CCand we10093PPwe could10094MDcould attribute10095VVattribute it10096PPit to10097TOto this10098DTthis question10099NNquestion .10100SENT. We10101PPwe do10102VVPdo n't10103RBn't have10104VHhave anything10105NNanything like10106INlike that10107DTthat here10108RBhere .10109SENT. So10110RBso what10111WPwhat are10112VBPbe we10113PPwe supposed10114VVNsuppose to10115TOto do10116VVdo about10117INabout that10118DTthat ?10119SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]10120LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well10121UHwell ,10122,, I10123PPI think10124VVPthink ...10125:... I10126PPI think10127VVPthink there10128EXthere are10129VBPbe a10130DTa few10131JJfew things10132NNSthing to10133TOto say10134VVsay .10135SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10136LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] And10137CCand ...10138:... and10139CCand ...10140:... and10141CCand ...10142:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10143LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well10144UHWell ...10145:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10146LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...10147:... and10148CCand let10149VVlet me10150PPme just10151RBjust throw10152VVPthrow in10153INin one10154CDone other10155JJother question10156NNquestion .10157SENT. I10158PPI know10159VVPknow your10160PP$your light10161NNlight 's10162VBZbe on10163INon ,10164,, but10165CCbut I10166PPI really10167RBreally wanted10168VVDwant to10169TOto get10170VVget it10171PPit to10172TOto you10173PPyou and10174CCand I10175PPI 'm10176VBPbe sorry10177JJsorry we10178PPwe have10179VHPhave n't10180RBn't gotten10181VVNget there10182RBthere .10183SENT. And10184CCand that10185DTthat is10186VBZbe ,10187,, what10188WPwhat do10189VVPdo we10190PPwe do10191VVPdo also10192RBalso ...10193:... and10194CCand it10195PPit 's10196VBZbe totally10197RBtotally different10198JJdifferent ,10199,, so10200RBso I10201PPI 'm10202VBPbe really10203RBreally sorry10204RBsorry ...10205:... what10206WPwhat do10207VVPdo we10208PPwe do10209VVPdo with10210INwith the10211DTthe fact10212NNfact that10213IN/thatthat ,10214,, as10215INas I10216PPI understand10217VVPunderstand it10218PPit ,10219,, some10220DTsome of10221INof the10222DTthe Respondents10223NNSrespondent and10224CCand other10225JJother people10226NNSpeople in10227INin litigation10228NNlitigation have10229VHPhave complained10230VVNcomplain when10231WRBwhen ...10232:... when10233WRBwhen folks10234NNSfolk have10235VHPhave relied10236VVNrely on10237INon the10238DTthe ACS10239NPACS to10240TOto extrapolate10241VVextrapolate citizenship10242NNcitizenship for10243INfor purposes10244NNSpurpose of10245INof redistricting10246VVGredistrict and10247CCand ,10248,, in10249INin fact10250NNfact ,10251,, argued10252VVDargue that10253IN/thatthat we10254PPwe should10255MDshould rely10256VVrely only10257RBonly on10258INon actual10259JJactual census10260NNcensus data10261NNSdatum ?10262SENT? And10263CCand I10264PPI understand10265VVPunderstand Respondents10266NNSrespondent have10267VHPhave made10268VVNmake that10269DTthat argument10270NNargument in10271INin litigation10272NNlitigation .10273SENT. So10274RBso what10275WPwhat do10276VVPdo we10277PPwe do10278VVPdo with10279INwith that10280DTthat ?10281SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]10282LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] There10283EXthere are10284VBPbe a10285DTa lot10286NNlot of10287INof complaints10288NNScomplaint about10289INabout the10290DTthe ACS10291NPACS .10292SENT. The10293DTthe Census10294NPCensus Bureau10295NPBureau 's10296POS's proposal10297NNproposal to10298TOto use10299VVuse administrative10300JJadministrative records10301NNSrecord solves10302VVZsolve most10303JJSmost of10304INof them10305PPthem .10306SENT. It10307PPit 's10308VBZbe not10309RBnot a10310DTa question10311NNquestion of10312INof just10313RBjust the10314DTthe ACS10315NPACS ,10316,, which10317WDTwhich is10318VBZbe a10319DTa survey10320NNsurvey about10321INabout which10322WDTwhich there10323EXthere have10324VHPhave been10325VBNbe many10326JJmany complaints10327NNScomplaint ,10328,, and10329CCand the10330DTthe ...10331:... putting10332VVGput the10333DTthe question10334NNquestion on10335INon the10336DTthe census10337NNcensus .10338SENT. The10339DTthe Census10340NPCensus Bureau10341NPBureau is10342VBZbe ...10343:... they10344PPthey are10345VBPbe data10346NNdata experts10347NNSexpert .10348SENT. There10349EXthere are10350VBPbe many10351JJmany ways10352NNSway of10353INof trying10354VVGtry to10355TOto collect10356VVcollect data10357NNSdatum .10358SENT. The10359DTthe question10360NNquestion in10361INin this10362DTthis case10363NNcase is10364VBZbe whether10365INwhether doing10366VVGdo it10367PPit on10368INon the10369DTthe census10370NNcensus form10371NNform is10372VBZbe warranted10373VVNwarrant ,10374,, even10375RBeven though10376INthough it10377PPit causes10378VVZcause such10379PDTsuch a10380DTa harm10381NNharm to10382TOto the10383DTthe count10384NNcount .10385SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10386LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I10387PPI thought10388VVDthink that10389DTthat ...10390:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10391LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Now10392RBnow that10393RBthat brings10394VVZbring us10395PPus back10396RBback ...10397:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10398LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...10399:... Dr10400NNDr .10401SENT. Abowd10402NNAbowd 's10403POS's testimony10404NNtestimony ,10405,, or10406CCor at10407INat least10408JJSleast the10409DTthe letter10410NNletter ,10411,, somewhere10412RBsomewhere I10413PPI read10414VVPread ,10415,, that10416IN/thatthat they10417PPthey controlled10418VVDcontrol for10419INfor the10420DTthe ...10421:... for10422INfor all10423DTall of10424INof the10425DTthe other10426JJother reasons10427NNSreason that10428IN/thatthat Justice10429NPJustice Gorsuch10430NPGorsuch was10431VBDbe mentioning10432VVGmention as10433INas reasons10434NNSreason why10435WRBwhy people10436NNSpeople would10437MDwould not10438RBnot complete10439VVcomplete ?10440SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]10441LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well10442UHwell ,10443,, they10444PPthey certainly10445RBcertainly controlled10446VVDcontrol for10447INfor the10448DTthe length10449NNlength of10450INof the10451DTthe form10452NNform .10453SENT. That10454DTthat was10455VBDbe the10456DTthe ...10457:... that10458WDTthat was10459VBDbe the10460DTthe ...10461:... [JUSTICE BREYER]10462LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Well10463UHWell ,10464,, not10465RBnot just10466RBjust that10467RBthat .10468SENT. On10469INon page10470NNpage 11010471CD@card@ ...10472:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10473LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Yes10474NPYes .10475SENT. Yes10476UHyes .10477SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]10478LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...10479:... of10480INof the10481DTthe Joint10482NPJoint Appendix10483NPAppendix ,10484,, it10485PPit says10486VVZsay whether10487INwhether the10488DTthe response10489NNresponse ...10490:... dah-dah-dah10491NNdah-dah-dah ...10492:... that10493IN/thatthat they10494PPthey 're10495VBPbe much10496RBmuch greater10497JJRgreat .10498SENT. It10499PPit says10500VVZsay in10501INin comparable10502JJcomparable rates10503NNSrate for10504INfor other10505JJother demographic10506JJdemographic variables10507NNSvariable ,10508,, like10509INlike sex10510NNsex ,10511,, birth10512NNbirth date10513NNdate ...10514:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10515LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Yes10516NPYes .10517SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]10518LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...10519:... age10520NNage ,10521,, race10522NNrace ,10523,, ethnicity10524NNethnicity .10525SENT. So10526RBso I10527PPI thought10528VVDthink that10529IN/thatthat that10530DTthat was10531VBDbe an10532DTan effort10533NNeffort to10534TOto control10535VVcontrol for10536INfor the10537DTthe things10538NNSthing that10539IN/thatthat Justice10540NPJustice Alito10541NPAlito ...10542:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10543LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] It10544PPit ...10545:... [JUSTICE BREYER]10546LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...10547:... mentioned10548VVNmention insofar10549RBinsofar as10550INas their10551PP$their relevance10552NNrelevance .10553SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]10554LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] It10555PPit was10556VBDbe .10557SENT. The10558DTthe ...10559:... the10560DTthe only10561JJonly limitation10562NNlimitation on10563INon it10564PPit was10565VBDbe that10566IN/thatthat they10567PPthey had10568VHDhave to10569TOto deal10570VVdeal with10571INwith data10572NNSdatum that10573WDTthat already10574RBalready existed10575VVDexist .10576SENT. Dr10577NPDr .10578SENT. Abowd10579NNSAbowd wanted10580VVDwant to10581TOto do10582VVdo a10583DTa random10584JJrandom controlled10585JJcontrolled test10586NNtest of10587INof this10588DTthis question10589NNquestion and10590CCand was10591VBDbe n't10592RBn't permitted10593VVNpermit to10594TOto do10595VVdo so10596RBso .10597SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]10598LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But10599CCbut that10600DTthat 's10601VBZbe not10602RBnot ...10603:... that10604WDTthat 's10605VBZbe a10606DTa ...10607:... that10608WDTthat 's10609VBZbe a10610DTa different10611JJdifferent issue10612NNissue ,10613,, is10614VBZbe n't10615RBn't it10616PPit ,10617,, what10618WPwhat Justice10619NPJustice Breyer10620NPBreyer mentioned10621VVDmention ?10622SENT? [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10623LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Yeah10624NPYeah .10625SENT. It10626PPit 's10627VBZbe totally10628RBtotally different10629JJdifferent ,10630,, yeah10631RByeah .10632SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]10633LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] It's10634NPIt's ...10635:... it10636PPit 's10637VBZbe ...10638:... it10639PPit 's10640VBZbe the10641DTthe decline10642NNdecline in10643INin the10644DTthe response10645NNresponse rate10646NNrate based10647VVNbase on10648INon those10649DTthose variables10650NNSvariable ,10651,, but10652CCbut not10653RBnot ...10654:... it10655PPit does10656VVZdo n't10657RBn't ...10658:... it10659PPit does10660VVZdo n't10661RBn't ,10662,, as10663INas Justice10664NPJustice Gorsuch10665NPGorsuch says10666VVZsay ,10667,, disaggregate10668VVGdisaggregate the10669DTthe many10670JJmany factors10671NNSfactor that10672WDTthat could10673MDcould explain10674VVexplain a10675DTa decline10676NNdecline when10677WRBwhen you10678PPyou 're10679VBPbe distinguishing10680VVGdistinguish between10681INbetween citizens10682NNScitizen and10683CCand non-citizens10684NNSnon-citizens .10685SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]10686LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Well10687UHwell ,10688,, it10689PPit did10690VVDdo try10691VVtry to10692TOto control10693VVcontrol for10694INfor other10695JJother properties10696NNSproperty that10697IN/thatthat citizens10698NNScitizen have10699VHPhave ...10700:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10701LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] But10702CCbut we10703PPwe do10704VVPdo n't10705RBn't ...10706:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10707LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] ...10708:... and10709CCand non-citizens10710NNSnon-citizens ...10711:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]10712LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Am10713NPAm ...10714:... am10715VBPbe I10716PPI right10717JJright ...10718:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10719LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] ...10720:... have10721VHPhave ...10722:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]10723LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...10724:... that10725IN/thatthat there10726RBthere ...10727:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10728LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] It10729PPit 's10730VBZbe fair10731JJfair to10732TOto say10733VVsay we10734PPwe do10735VVPdo n't10736RBn't have10737VHhave this10738DTthis isolated10739JJisolated ,10740,, though10741RBthough ,10742,, is10743VBZbe n't10744RBn't it10745PPit ?10746SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]10747LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] They10748PPthey did10749VVDdo their10750PP$their best10751JJSgood .10752SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]10753LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] They10754PPthey did10755VVDdo their10756PP$their best10757JJSgood .10758SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]10759LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] There10760EXthere is10761VBZbe some10762DTsome degree10763NNdegree of10764INof isolation10765NNisolation ,10766,, enough10767RBenough to10768TOto enable10769VVenable them10770PPthem to10771TOto believe10772VVbelieve that10773IN/thatthat they10774PPthey had10775VHDhave isolated10776VVNisolate the10777DTthe factors10778NNSfactor that10779IN/thatthat people10780NNSpeople thought10781VVDthink of10782INof as10783RBas plausible10784JJplausible .10785SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]10786LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah10787UHYeah ,10788,, I10789PPI mean10790VVPmean ...10791:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]10792LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Would10793MDwould it10794PPit be10795VBbe right10796JJright to10797TOto say10798VVsay ...10799:... [JUSTICE BREYER]10800LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...10801:... there10802EXthere are10803VBPbe a10804DTa million10805CDmillion factors10806NNSfactor .10807SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]10808LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Yes10809NPYes .10810SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]10811LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] There10812RBthere 's10813POS's pet10814JJpet dogs10815NNSdog ,10816,, you10817PPyou know10818VVPknow .10819SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]10820LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Yes10821NPYes .10822SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]10823LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I10824PPI mean10825VVPmean ,10826,, there10827EXthere are10828VBPbe cats10829NNScat .10830SENT. And10831CCand ...10832:... and10833CCand so10834RBso ,10835,, if10836INif ,10837,, in10838INin fact10839NNfact ,10840,, there10841EXthere were10842VBDbe some10843DTsome factors10844NNSfactor that10845WDTthat are10846VBPbe relevant10847JJrelevant which10848WDTwhich were10849VBDbe not10850RBnot in10851INin the10852DTthe data10853NNSdatum because10854INbecause they10855PPthey only10856RBonly controlled10857VVDcontrol for10858INfor six10859CDsix other10860JJother factors10861NNSfactor instead10862RBinstead of10863INof 60010864CD@card@ ,10865,, I10866PPI would10867MDwould expect10868VVexpect somewhere10869RBsomewhere in10870INin this10871DTthis record10872NNrecord someone10873NNsomeone to10874TOto have10875VHhave written10876VVNwrite that10877IN/thatthat there10878EXthere were10879VBDbe these10880DTthese other10881JJother factors10882NNSfactor that10883WDTthat also10884RBalso should10885MDshould have10886VHhave been10887VBNbe controlled10888VVNcontrol for10889INfor .10890SENT. I10891PPI know10892VVPknow what10893WPwhat you10894PPyou 're10895VBPbe going10896VVGgo to10897TOto say10898VVsay ,10899,, unless10900INunless I10901PPI 'm10902VBPbe wrong10903JJwrong ,10904,, you10905PPyou better10906VVPbetter not10907RBnot tell10908VVtell me10909PPme that10910IN/thatthat I10911PPI am10912VBPbe right10913RBright if10914INif I10915PPI 'm10916VBPbe not10917RBnot .10918SENT. But10919CCbut I10920PPI could10921MDcould not10922RBnot ...10923:... [10924SYM[ LAUGHTER10925NNlaughter ]10926SYM] [JUSTICE BREYER]10927LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...10928:... find10929VVfind any10930DTany such10931JJsuch place10932NNplace in10933INin the10934DTthe record10935NNrecord .10936SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]10937LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Nobody10938NNnobody proposed10939VVNpropose ,10940,, that10941IN/thatthat I10942PPI know10943VVPknow of10944INof ,10945,, proposed10946VVNpropose factors10947NNSfactor that10948WDTthat might10949MDmight be10950VBbe alternative10951JJalternative explanations10952NNSexplanation that10953WDTthat should10954MDshould have10955VHhave been10956VBNbe tested10957VVNtest for10958INfor .10959SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]10960LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] And10961CCand ...10962:... and10963CCand would10964MDwould it10965PPit be10966VBbe right10967JJright to10968TOto say10969VVsay ,10970,, General10971NPGeneral ,10972,, that10973WDTthat it10974PPit was10975VBDbe the10976DTthe Census10977NPCensus Bureau10978NPBureau 's10979POS's conclusion10980NNconclusion ,10981,, a10982DTa bureau10983NNbureau full10984JJfull of10985INof statisticians10986NNSstatistician ...10987:... [MS. UNDERWOOD]10988LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Yes10989NPYes .10990SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]10991LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...10992:... that10993IN/thatthat it10994PPit was10995VBDbe the10996DTthe citizen10997NNcitizen ...10998:... citizenship10999NNcitizenship question11000NNquestion that11001WDTthat was11002VBDbe driving11003VVGdrive the11004DTthe differential11005JJdifferential response11006NNresponse rates11007NNSrate ?11008SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]11009LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] That11010DTthat is11011VBZbe ...11012:... that11013WDTthat is11014VBZbe correct11015JJcorrect .11016SENT. I11017PPI do11018VVPdo want11019VVwant to11020TOto make11021VVmake ...11022:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11023LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Are11024VBPbe there11025RBthere other11026JJother ...11027:... are11028VBPbe there11029RBthere other11030JJother questions11031NNSquestion on11032INon the11033DTthe census11034NNcensus for11035INfor which11036WDTwhich the11037DTthe administrative11038JJadministrative records11039NNSrecord provide11040VVPprovide more11041RBRmore accurate11042JJaccurate information11043NNinformation ?11044SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]11045LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] There11046EXthere is11047VBZbe nothing11048NNnothing in11049INin the11050DTthe record11051NNrecord about11052INabout that11053DTthat .11054SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11055LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well11056UHWell ,11057,, then11058RBthen I11059PPI do11060VVPdo n't11061RBn't want11062VVwant to11063TOto hear11064VVhear about11065INabout it11066PPit .11067SENT. [MS. UNDERWOOD]11068LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] Okay11069NPOkay .11070SENT. Okay11071JJokay .11072SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]11073LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Could11074MDcould you11075PPyou answer11076VVanswer the11077DTthe General11078NPGeneral 's11079POS's point11080NNpoint that11081IN/thatthat ,11082,, if11083INif you11084PPyou rely11085VVPrely on11086INon 611087CD6 (11088(( c11089LSc )11090)) ,11091,, then11092RBthen you11093PPyou should11094MDshould n't11095RBn't be11096VBbe even11097RBeven asking11098VVGask this11099DTthis on11100INon the11101DTthe ACS11102NPACS form11103NNform ?11104SENT? [MS. UNDERWOOD]11105LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD] No11106NPNo .11107SENT. The11108DTthe ...11109:... for11110INfor one11111CDone thing11112NNthing ,11113,, in11114INin order11115NNorder to11116TOto do11117VVdo modeling11118NNmodeling ,11119,, in11120INin order11121NNorder to11122TOto do11123VVdo sampling11124NNsampling ,11125,, they11126PPthey need11127VVPneed some11128DTsome survey11129NNsurvey data11130NNSdatum to11131TOto compare11132VVcompare it11133PPit to11134TOto .11135SENT. And11136CCand so11137RBso some11138DTsome judgments11139NNSjudgment can11140MDcan be11141VBbe made11142VVNmake ,11143,, and11144CCand the11145DTthe judgment11146NNjudgment might11147MDmight be11148VBbe made11149VVNmake that11150IN/thatthat the11151DTthe ACS11152NPACS or11153CCor some11154DTsome questionnaire11155NNquestionnaire that11156WDTthat does11157VVZdo n't11158RBn't involve11159VVinvolve harm11160NNharm to11161TOto the11162DTthe count11163NNcount that11164WDTthat is11165VBZbe sampling11166NNsampling or11167CCor ...11168:... or11169CCor some11170DTsome other11171JJother form11172NNform of11173INof ...11174:... less11175RBRless ...11176:... less11177RBRless than11178INthan universal11179JJuniversal questioning11180VVGquestion ,11181,, that11182IN/thatthat testing11183NNtesting questions11184NNSquestion on11185INon that11186DTthat kind11187NNkind of11188INof instrument11189NNinstrument is11190VBZbe the11191DTthe way11192NNway to11193TOto do11194VVdo it11195PPit .11196SENT. But11197CCbut ...11198:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11199LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank11200VVthank you11201PPyou .11202SENT. Thank11203VVthank you11204PPyou ,11205,, General11206NPGeneral .11207SENT. Mr11208NPMr .11209SENT. Ho11210NPHo .11211SENT.

[MR. HO]11212LOC[MR. HO] Mr11213NPMr .11214SENT. Chief11215NPChief Justice11216NPJustice ,11217,, and11218CCand may11219MDmay it11220PPit please11221VVplease the11222DTthe Court11223NPCourt :11224:: The11225DTthe Secretary11226NPSecretary 's11227POS's decision11228NNdecision rested11229VVDrest primarily11230RBprimarily on11231INon one11232CDone assertion11233NNassertion ,11234,, that11235WDTthat it11236PPit would11237MDwould improve11238VVimprove the11239DTthe accuracy11240NNaccuracy of11241INof citizenship11242NNcitizenship data11243NNSdatum provided11244VVDprovide to11245TOto the11246DTthe Department11247NPDepartment of11248INof Justice11249NPJustice .11250SENT. But11251CCbut the11252DTthe administrative11253JJadministrative record11254NNrecord revealed11255VVDreveal precisely11256RBprecisely the11257DTthe opposite11258NNopposite ,11259,, that11260WDTthat it11261PPit would11262MDwould make11263VVmake that11264DTthat data11265NNSdatum less11266RBRless accurate11267JJaccurate and11268CCand ,11269,, thus11270RBthus ,11271,, harm11272VVPharm the11273DTthe Secretary11274NPSecretary 's11275POS's stated11276JJstated purpose11277NNpurpose of11278INof Voting11279NPVoting Rights11280NPSRights Act11281NPAct enforcement11282NNenforcement .11283SENT. And11284CCand the11285DTthe Secretary11286NPSecretary 's11287POS's explanation11288NNexplanation for11289INfor his11290PP$his decision11291NNdecision misstated11292VVDmisstate the11293DTthe evidence11294NNevidence in11295INin the11296DTthe record11297NNrecord in11298INin three11299CDthree critical11300JJcritical respects11301NNSrespect .11302SENT. First11303RBfirst ,11304,, the11305DTthe Secretary11306NPSecretary asserted11307VVDassert that11308IN/thatthat adding11309VVGadd the11310DTthe question11311NNquestion would11312MDwould maximize11313VVmaximize the11314DTthe Census11315NPCensus Bureau11316NPBureau 's11317POS's ability11318NNability to11319TOto use11320VVuse administrative11321JJadministrative records11322NNSrecord on11323INon citizenship11324NNcitizenship .11325SENT. But11326CCbut the11327DTthe government11328NNgovernment has11329VHZhave conceded11330VVNconcede that11331IN/thatthat that11332DTthat was11333VBDbe not11334RBnot true11335JJtrue .11336SENT. At11337INat page11338NNpage 3211339CD@card@ of11340INof their11341PP$their brief11342NNbrief ,11343,, they11344PPthey acknowledge11345VVPacknowledge that11346IN/thatthat ,11347,, if11348INif the11349DTthe question11350NNquestion is11351VBZbe added11352VVNadd ,11353,, the11354DTthe number11355NNnumber of11356INof people11357NNSpeople who11358WPwho can11359MDcan be11360VBbe matched11361VVNmatch to11362TOto these11363DTthese administrative11364JJadministrative records11365NNSrecord ,11366,, the11367DTthe most11368RBSmost accurate11369JJaccurate information11370NNinformation that11371IN/thatthat we11372PPwe have11373VHPhave on11374INon citizenship11375NNcitizenship ,11376,, will11377MDwill fall11378VVfall by11379INby one11380CDone million11381CDmillion .11382SENT. Second11383RBsecond ,11384,, the11385DTthe Secretary11386NPSecretary asserted11387VVDassert that11388IN/thatthat adding11389VVGadd the11390DTthe question11391NNquestion would11392MDwould improve11393VVimprove the11394DTthe bureau11395NNbureau 's11396POS's imputation11397NNimputation of11398INof citizenship11399NNcitizenship for11400INfor people11401NNSpeople who11402WPwho lack11403VVPlack ...11404:... for11405INfor people11406NNSpeople for11407INfor whom11408WPwhom the11409DTthe government11410NNgovernment lacks11411VVZlack any11412DTany such11413JJsuch records11414NNSrecord .11415SENT. But11416CCbut the11417DTthe government11418NNgovernment has11419VHZhave conceded11420VVNconcede that11421IN/thatthat that11422DTthat was11423VBDbe not11424RBnot true11425JJtrue either11426RBeither .11427SENT. At11428INat page11429NNpage 3411430CD@card@ of11431INof their11432PP$their opening11433NNopening brief11434NNbrief ,11435,, they11436PPthey acknowledge11437VVPacknowledge that11438IN/thatthat the11439DTthe Census11440NPCensus Bureau11441NPBureau determined11442VVDdetermine that11443IN/thatthat if11444INif the11445DTthe question11446NNquestion is11447VBZbe added11448VVNadd ,11449,, the11450DTthe imputation11451NNimputation process11452NNprocess will11453MDwill become11454VVbecome less11455RBRless accurate11456JJaccurate .11457SENT. And11458CCand here11459RBhere 's11460VBZbe why11461WRBwhy :11462:: The11463DTthe accuracy11464NNaccuracy of11465INof imputation11466NNimputation depends11467VVZdepend upon11468INupon the11469DTthe accuracy11470NNaccuracy of11471INof existing11472VVGexist data11473NNSdatum .11474SENT. Federal11475JJFederal administrative11476JJadministrative records11477NNSrecord are11478VBPbe based11479VVNbase on11480INon a11481DTa person11482NNperson 's11483POS's legal11484JJlegal documents11485NNSdocument of11486INof their11487PP$their citizenship11488NNcitizenship and11489CCand ,11490,, thus11491RBthus ,11492,, are11493VBPbe quite11494RBquite accurate11495JJaccurate and11496CCand reliable11497JJreliable for11498INfor this11499DTthis purpose11500NNpurpose .11501SENT. But11502CCbut the11503DTthe citizenship11504NNcitizenship question11505NNquestion is11506VBZbe not11507RBnot .11508SENT. The11509DTthe evidence11510NNevidence shows11511VVZshow that11512IN/thatthat non-citizens11513NNSnon-citizens respond11514VVrespond to11515TOto the11516DTthe question11517NNquestion inaccurately11518RBinaccurately one-third11519JJone-third of11520INof the11521DTthe time11522NNtime .11523SENT. So11524RBso ,11525,, if11526INif the11527DTthe question11528NNquestion is11529VBZbe used11530VVNuse ,11531,, the11532DTthe data11533NNdata that11534WDTthat 's11535VBZbe used11536VVNuse for11537INfor imputation11538NNimputation will11539MDwill be11540VBbe contaminated11541VVNcontaminate by11542INby those11543DTthose incorrect11544JJincorrect responses11545NNSresponse ,11546,, making11547VVGmake the11548DTthe output11549NNoutput of11550INof the11551DTthe imputation11552NNimputation process11553NNprocess less11554RBRless accurate11555JJaccurate ,11556,, making11557VVGmake the11558DTthe data11559NNSdatum less11560RBRless accurate11561JJaccurate ,11562,, and11563CCand ,11564,, again11565RBagain ,11566,, harming11567VVGharm the11568DTthe Secretary11569NPSecretary 's11570POS's stated11571JJstated purpose11572NNpurpose of11573INof improving11574VVGimprove the11575DTthe accuracy11576NNaccuracy of11577INof citizenship11578NNcitizenship information11579NNinformation .11580SENT. The11581DTthe Secretary11582NPSecretary misstated11583VVDmisstate the11584DTthe evidence11585NNevidence in11586INin a11587DTa third11588JJthird respect11589NNrespect .11590SENT. He11591PPhe asserted11592VVDassert that11593IN/thatthat adding11594VVGadd the11595DTthe question11596NNquestion would11597MDwould fill11598VVfill in11599INin the11600DTthe gaps11601NNSgap in11602INin 2211603CD@card@ million11604CDmillion ...11605:... for11606INfor 2211607CD@card@ million11608CDmillion people11609NNSpeople in11610INin administrative11611JJadministrative records11612NNSrecord on11613INon citizenship11614NNcitizenship .11615SENT. But11616CCbut the11617DTthe Census11618NPCensus Bureau11619NPBureau concluded11620VVDconclude specifically11621RBspecifically ,11622,, on11623INon the11624DTthe last11625JJlast page11626NNpage of11627INof their11628PP$their March11629NPMarch 111630CD1 memo11631NNmemo in11632INin the11633DTthe administrative11634JJadministrative record11635NNrecord ,11636,, that11637IN/thatthat the11638DTthe Secretary11639NPSecretary 's11640POS's decision11641NNdecision will11642MDwill not11643RBnot solve11644VVsolve that11645DTthat problem11646NNproblem .11647SENT. And11648CCand the11649DTthe reason11650NNreason is11651VBZbe ,11652,, again11653RBagain ,11654,, because11655INbecause responses11656NNSresponse to11657TOto the11658DTthe question11659NNquestion are11660VBPbe highly11661RBhighly inaccurate11662JJinaccurate ,11663,, whereas11664INwhereas the11665DTthe imputation11666NNimputation process11667NNprocess ,11668,, based11669VVNbase solely11670RBsolely on11671INon ...11672:... on11673INon administrative11674JJadministrative records11675NNSrecord ,11676,, would11677MDwould be11678VBbe more11679RBRmore accurate11680JJaccurate .11681SENT. That11682DTthat 's11683VBZbe reflected11684VVNreflect in11685INin the11686DTthe Census11687NPCensus Bureau11688NPBureau 's11689POS's bottom-line11690JJbottom-line conclusion11691NNconclusion in11692INin its11693PP$its March11694NPMarch 111695CD1 memo11696NNmemo ,11697,, and11698CCand it11699PPit 's11700VBZbe reflected11701VVNreflect in11702INin the11703DTthe testimony11704NNtestimony of11705INof Dr11706NPDr .11707SENT. Abowd11708NNSAbowd on11709INon that11710DTthat trial11711NNtrial .11712SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]11713LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But11714CCbut this11715DTthis takes11716VVZtake us11717PPus back11718RBback ,11719,, does11720VVZdo it11721PPit not11722RBnot ,11723,, if11724INif I11725PPI 'm11726VBPbe following11727VVGfollow your11728PP$your argument11729NNargument ,11730,, to11731TOto the11732DTthe 2211733CD@card@ .11734SENT. 611735CD6 million11736CDmillion people11737NNSpeople who11738WPwho will11739MDwill answer11740VVanswer the11741DTthe citizenship11742NNcitizenship question11743NNquestion but11744CCbut as11745INas to11746TOto whom11747WPwhom there11748RBthere are11749VBPbe n't11750RBn't administrative11751JJadministrative records11752NNSrecord ?11753SENT? That11754DTthat 's11755VBZbe what11756WPwhat you11757PPyou 're11758VBPbe talking11759VVGtalk about11760RBabout ?11761SENT? [MR. HO]11762LOC[MR. HO] Yes11763NPYes ,11764,, Justice11765NPJustice Alito11766NPAlito .11767SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]11768LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Okay11769NPOkay .11770SENT. And11771CCand so11772RBso then11773RBthen this11774DTthis is11775VBZbe territory11776NNterritory that11777DTthat we've11778NNwe've ...11779:... we11780PPwe 've11781VHPhave covered11782VVNcover ,11783,, but11784CCbut ,11785,, if11786INif the11787DTthe Secretary11788NPSecretary is11789VBZbe told11790VVNtell here11791RBhere 's11792VBZbe the11793DTthe error11794NNerror rate11795NNrate that11796IN/thatthat we11797PPwe can11798MDcan expect11799VVexpect for11800INfor those11801DTthose who11802WPwho answer11803VVPanswer the11804DTthe citizenship11805NNcitizenship question11806NNquestion ,11807,, and11808CCand on11809INon the11810DTthe other11811JJother hand11812NNhand ,11813,, we11814PPwe have11815VHPhave this11816DTthis model11817NNmodel and11818CCand we11819PPwe can11820MDcan 't11821RB't tell11822VVtell you11823PPyou how11824WRBhow accurate11825JJaccurate it11826PPit is11827VBZbe ,11828,, but11829CCbut trust11830VVtrust us11831PPus ,11832,, it11833PPit 's11834VBZbe going11835VVGgo to11836TOto be11837VBbe better11838JJRgood ,11839,, is11840VBZbe it11841PPit arbitrary11842JJarbitrary and11843CCand capricious11844JJcapricious for11845INfor the11846DTthe Secretary11847NPSecretary to11848TOto say11849VVsay ,11850,, I11851PPI do11852VVPdo n't11853RBn't want11854VVwant to11855TOto go11856VVgo with11857INwith this11858DTthis model11859NNmodel because11860INbecause I11861PPI do11862VVPdo n't11863RBn't know11864VVknow what11865WPwhat the11866DTthe accuracy11867NNaccuracy of11868INof that11869WDTthat is11870VBZbe ?11871SENT? [MR. HO]11872LOC[MR. HO] Justice11873NPJustice Alito11874NPAlito ,11875,, respectfully11876RBrespectfully ,11877,, I11878PPI think11879VVPthink the11880DTthe Census11881NPCensus Bureau11882NPBureau said11883VVDsay a11884DTa little11885JJlittle bit11886NNbit more11887RBRmore than11888INthan trust11889VVtrust us11890PPus .11891SENT. What11892WPWhat the11893DTthe Census11894NPCensus Bureau11895NPBureau said11896VVDsay was11897VBDbe we11898PPwe can11899MDcan develop11900VVdevelop a11901DTa highly11902RBhighly accurate11903JJaccurate model11904NNmodel for11905INfor this11906DTthis that11907WDTthat 's11908VBZbe going11909VVGgo to11910TOto be11911VBbe better11912JJRgood than11913INthan getting11914VVGget the11915DTthe question11916NNquestion wrong11917JJwrong one-third11918NNone-third of11919INof the11920DTthe time11921NNtime ,11922,, which11923WDTwhich is11924VBZbe what11925WPwhat ...11926:... [JUSTICE ALITO]11927LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Yeah11928UHYeah ,11929,, well11930UHwell ,11931,, they11932PPthey said11933VVDsay ,11934,, in11935INin our11936PP$our opinion11937NNopinion ,11938,, this11939DTthis would11940MDwould be11941VBbe better11942JJRgood ,11943,, but11944CCbut they11945PPthey can11946MDcan 't11947RB't quantify11948VVquantify it11949PPit .11950SENT. They11951PPthey ...11952:... they11953PPthey do11954VVPdo n't11955RBn't provide11956VVprovide a11957DTa specific11958JJspecific number11959NNnumber ;11960:; they11961PPthey do11962VVPdo n't11963RBn't even11964RBeven provide11965VVprovide a11966DTa range11967NNrange .11968SENT. Am11969VBPbe I11970PPI right11971JJright on11972INon that11973DTthat ?11974SENT? [MR. HO]11975LOC[MR. HO] They11976PPthey do11977VVPdo say11978VVsay that11979IN/thatthat it11980PPit would11981MDwould be11982VBbe more11983RBRmore accurate11984JJaccurate than11985INthan responses11986NNSresponse to11987TOto the11988DTthe citizenship11989NNcitizenship question11990NNquestion ,11991,, which11992WDTwhich they11993PPthey do11994VVPdo quantify11995VVquantify as11996INas being11997VBGbe incorrect11998JJincorrect one-third11999NNone-third of12000INof the12001DTthe time12002NNtime for12003INfor non-citizens12004NNSnon-citizens .12005SENT. And12006CCand if12007INif I12008PPI could12009MDcould get12010VVget back12011RBback to12012TOto ...12013:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12014LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] But12015CCbut it12016PPit is12017VBZbe a12018DTa ...12019:... [MR. HO]12020LOC[MR. HO] ...12021:... Justice12022NPJustice Kavanaugh's12023NPKavanaugh's ...12024:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12025LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Go12026NPGo ...12027:... go12028VVPgo ahead12029RBahead .12030SENT. [MR. HO]12031LOC[MR. HO] Oh12032UHoh ,12033,, I12034PPI 'm12035VBPbe sorry12036JJsorry .12037SENT. Justice12038NPJustice Kavanaugh12039NPKavanaugh 's12040POS's question12041NNquestion earlier12042RBRearlier about12043RBabout whether12044INwhether or12045CCor not12046RBnot that12047WDTthat can12048MDcan help12049VVhelp with12050INwith Voting12051NPVoting Rights12052NPSRights Act12053NPAct enforcement12054NNenforcement ,12055,, it12056PPit can12057MDcan 't12058RB't .12059SENT. And12060CCand ...12061:... and12062CCand here12063RBhere 's12064VBZbe why12065NNwhy :12066:: Citizenship12067NNcitizenship data12068NNSdatum matters12069NNSmatter in12070INin the12071DTthe Voting12072NPVoting Rights12073NPSRights Act12074NPAct .12075SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12076LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I12077PPI 'm12078VBPbe sorry12079JJsorry ,12080,, just12081RBjust to12082TOto ...12083:... what12084WPwhat can12085MDcan 't12086RB't ?12087SENT? [MR. HO]12088LOC[MR. HO] I12089PPI 'm12090VBPbe sorry12091JJsorry .12092SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12093LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I12094PPI lost12095VVDlose sight12096NNsight of12097INof the12098DTthe "12099``" it12100PPit "12101''" in12102INin your12103PP$your answer12104NNanswer .12105SENT. [MR. HO]12106LOC[MR. HO] The12107NPThe Secretary12108NPSecretary 's12109POS's question12110NNquestion ,12111,, Mr12112NPMr .12113SENT. Chief12114NNchief ...12115:... the12116DTthe Secretary12117NPSecretary 's12118POS's decision12119NNdecision ,12120,, Mr12121NPMr .12122SENT. Chief12123NPChief Justice12124NPJustice .12125SENT. And12126CCand responses12127NNSresponse ...12128:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12129LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I12130PPI thought12131VVDthink you12132PPyou were12133VBDbe talking12134VVGtalk about12135RBabout whether12136INwhether it12137PPit 's12138VBZbe helpful12139JJhelpful with12140INwith respect12141NNrespect to12142TOto the12143DTthe voting12144NNvoting rights12145NNSright information12146NNinformation .12147SENT. [MR. HO]12148LOC[MR. HO] That12149DTthat 's12150VBZbe right12151JJright .12152SENT. Adding12153VVGadd a12154DTa citizenship12155NNcitizenship question12156NNquestion to12157TOto the12158DTthe census12159NNcensus ,12160,, I12161PPI 'm12162VBPbe sorry12163JJsorry ,12164,, is12165VBZbe not12166RBnot helpful12167JJhelpful for12168INfor Voting12169NPVoting Rights12170NPSRights Act12171NPAct purposes12172NNSpurpose because12173INbecause responses12174NNSresponse to12175TOto the12176DTthe question12177NNquestion are12178VBPbe inaccurate12179JJinaccurate so12180RBso frequently12181RBfrequently for12182INfor non-citizens12183NNSnon-citizens .12184SENT. Citizenship12185NNcitizenship matters12186NNSmatter in12187INin the12188DTthe Voting12189NPVoting Rights12190NPSRights Act12191NPAct context12192NNcontext when12193WRBwhen you12194PPyou 're12195VBPbe dealing12196VVGdeal with12197INwith a12198DTa population12199NNpopulation in12200INin which12201WDTwhich there12202EXthere 's12203VBZbe a12204DTa large12205JJlarge number12206NNnumber of12207INof non-citizens12208NNSnon-citizens .12209SENT. The12210DTthe VRA12211NPVRA requires12212VVZrequire the12213DTthe drawing12214NNdrawing of12215INof districts12216NNSdistrict in12217INin which12218WDTwhich minority12219NNminority voters12220NNSvoter constitute12221VVPconstitute a12222DTa majority12223NNmajority sometimes12224RBsometimes under12225INunder some12226DTsome circumstances12227NNScircumstance .12228SENT. Now12229RBnow ,12230,, under12231INunder normal12232JJnormal circumstances12233NNScircumstance ,12234,, voting12235VVGvote age12236NNage population12237NNpopulation data12238NNSdatum will12239MDwill be12240VBbe sufficient12241JJsufficient for12242INfor that12243DTthat purpose12244NNpurpose if12245INif citizenship12246NNcitizenship rates12247NNSrate are12248VBPbe high12249JJhigh .12250SENT. But12251CCbut ,12252,, if12253INif the12254DTthe minority12255NNminority group12256NNgroup has12257VHZhave relatively12258RBrelatively low12259JJlow citizenship12260NNcitizenship rates12261NNSrate ,12262,, for12263INfor example12264NNexample ,12265,, as12266INas is12267VBZbe the12268DTthe case12269NNcase with12270INwith Hispanic12271JJHispanic populations12272NNSpopulation in12273INin some12274DTsome circumstances12275NNScircumstance ,12276,, then12277RBthen you12278PPyou need12279VVPneed citizenship12280NNcitizenship data12281NNSdatum to12282TOto make12283VVmake sure12284JJsure that12285IN/thatthat you12286PPyou 're12287VBPbe drawing12288VVGdraw a12289DTa district12290NNdistrict in12291INin which12292WDTwhich minority12293NNminority voters12294NNSvoter are12295VBPbe ,12296,, in12297INin fact12298NNfact ,12299,, a12300DTa majority12301NNmajority of12302INof the12303DTthe population12304NNpopulation .12305SENT. And12306CCand data12307NNSdatum that12308WDTthat 's12309VBZbe wrong12310JJwrong one-third12311NNone-third of12312INof the12313DTthe ...12314:... the12315DTthe time12316NNtime with12317INwith respect12318NNrespect to12319TOto non-citizens12320NNnon-citizens just12321RBjust does12322VVZdo n't12323RBn't help12324VVhelp you12325PPyou draw12326VVdraw districts12327NNSdistrict ...12328:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12329LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well12330UHWell ,12331,, when12332WRBwhen we12333PPwe ...12334:... [MR. HO]12335LOC[MR. HO] ...12336:... at12337INat that12338DTthat granular12339JJgranular block-by-block12340NNblock-by-block level12341NNlevel .12342SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12343LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well12344UHWell ,12345,, when12346WRBwhen we12347PPwe talk12348VVPtalk about12349INabout the12350DTthe block-by-block12351NNblock-by-block level12352NNlevel ,12353,, one12354CDone of12355INof the12356DTthe complaints12357NNScomplaint that12358IN/thatthat we12359PPwe 've12360VHPhave heard12361VVNhear from12362INfrom the12363DTthe other12364JJother side12365NNside is12366VBZbe that12367IN/thatthat the12368DTthe data12369NNdata that12370IN/thatthat we12371PPwe rely12372VVPrely on12373INon from12374INfrom the12375DTthe ACS12376NPACS is12377VBZbe at12378INat too12379RBtoo high12380JJhigh a12381DTa level12382NNlevel and12383CCand that12384IN/thatthat the12385DTthe census12386NNcensus goes12387VVZgo down12388RPdown to12389TOto a12390DTa more12391RBRmore granular12392JJgranular level12393NNlevel .12394SENT. And12395CCand ,12396,, in12397INin fact12398NNfact ,12399,, some12400DTsome of12401INof the12402DTthe states12403NNSstate who12404WPwho are12405VBPbe now12406RBnow Respondents12407NNSrespondent before12408INbefore us12409PPus have12410VHPhave in12411INin litigation12412NNlitigation ,12413,, including12414VVGinclude in12415INin this12416DTthis Court12417NPCourt ,12418,, argued12419VVDargue that12420IN/thatthat ACS12421NPACS data12422NNSdatum should12423MDshould not12424RBnot be12425VBbe relied12426VVNrely upon12427RPupon for12428INfor purposes12429NNSpurpose of12430INof citizenship12431NNcitizenship or12432CCor other12433JJother purposes12434NNSpurpose ,12435,, that12436IN/thatthat the12437DTthe census12438NNcensus data12439NNdata is12440VBZbe more12441RBRmore accurate12442JJaccurate .12443SENT. What12444WPWhat do12445VVPdo we12446PPwe do12447VVPdo about12448RBabout that12449RBthat ?12450SENT? It12451PPit seems12452VVZseem to12453TOto me12454PPme like12455INlike you12456PPyou kind12457RBkind of12458INof put12459VVput the12460DTthe government12461NNgovernment in12462INin a12463DTa bit12464NNbit of12465INof a12466DTa Catch12467NNcatch 2212468CD@card@ .12469SENT. You12470PPyou say12471VVPsay they12472PPthey should12473MDshould n't12474RBn't use12475VVuse the12476DTthe census12477NNcensus ,12478,, except12479INexcept for12480INfor in12481INin later12482JJRlate litigation12483NNlitigation when12484WRBwhen they12485PPthey have12486VHPhave to12487TOto use12488VVuse the12489DTthe census12490NNcensus .12491SENT. [MR. HO]12492LOC[MR. HO] Justice12493NPJustice Gorsuch12494NPGorsuch ,12495,, let12496VVDlet me12497PPme say12498VVPsay two12499CDtwo things12500NNSthing in12501INin response12502NNresponse to12503TOto that12504DTthat .12505SENT. The12506DTthe first12507JJfirst is12508VBZbe that12509IN/thatthat ,12510,, to12511TOto the12512DTthe extent12513NNextent that12514IN/thatthat more12515RBRmore granular12516JJgranular citizenship12517NNcitizenship data12518NNSdatum were12519VBDbe ,12520,, in12521INin fact12522NNfact ,12523,, necessary12524JJnecessary for12525INfor Voting12526NPVoting Rights12527NPSRights Act12528NPAct enforcement12529NNenforcement purposes12530NNSpurpose ,12531,, and12532CCand we12533PPwe ,12534,, I12535PPI think12536VVPthink ,12537,, set12538VVPset forth12539RBforth a12540DTa number12541NNnumber of12542INof reasons12543NNSreason in12544INin our12545PP$our brief12546NNbrief why12547WRBwhy that12548DTthat 's12549VBZbe not12550RBnot ,12551,, in12552INin fact12553NNfact ,12554,, the12555DTthe case12556NNcase ,12557,, but12558CCbut just12559RBjust assuming12560VVGassume that12561IN/thatthat it12562PPit is12563VBZbe ,12564,, the12565DTthe ...12566:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12567LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Well12568UHwell ,12569,, we12570PPwe ...12571:... we12572PPwe know12573VVPknow states12574NNSstate have12575VHPhave argued12576VVNargue this12577DTthis ,12578,, including12579VVGinclude some12580DTsome of12581INof the12582DTthe Respondents12583NNSrespondent before12584INbefore us12585PPus .12586SENT. So12587RBso I'm12588NPI'm ...12589:... you12590PPyou know12591VVPknow ,12592,, it12593PPit is12594VBZbe a12595DTa thing12596NNthing .12597SENT. [MR. HO]12598LOC[MR. HO] Okay12599NPOkay ,12600,, that12601WDTthat ...12602:... that12603WDTthat 's12604VBZbe fair12605JJfair .12606SENT. But12607CCbut what12608WPwhat the12609DTthe Census12610NPCensus Bureau12611NPBureau recommended12612VVDrecommend was12613VBDbe that12614IN/thatthat it12615PPit could12616MDcould develop12617VVdevelop that12618IN/thatthat block-level12619JJblock-level data12620NNSdatum either12621CCeither with12622INwith existing12623VVGexist ACS12624NPACS data12625NNSdatum or12626CCor using12627VVGuse administrative12628JJadministrative records12629NNSrecord and12630CCand that12631DTthat that12632WDTthat would12633MDwould be12634VBbe ,12635,, in12636INin fact12637NNfact ,12638,, the12639DTthe best12640JJSgood and12641CCand most12642RBSmost accurate12643JJaccurate way12644NNway to12645TOto do12646VVdo that12647DTthat .12648SENT. And12649CCand ...12650:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12651LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] So12652RBso ...12653:... so12654RBso the12655DTthe states12656NNSstate that12657WDTthat said12658VVDsay previously12659RBpreviously that12660DTthat was12661VBDbe n't12662RBn't enough12663RBenough now12664RBnow are12665VBPbe going12666VVGgo in12667INin all12668DTall future12669JJfuture litigation12670NNlitigation to12671TOto bind12672VVbind themselves12673PPthemselves to12674TOto accept12675VVaccept that12676IN/thatthat it12677PPit is12678VBZbe enough12679JJenough ?12680SENT? [MR. HO]12681LOC[MR. HO] Well12682UHWell ...12683:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12684LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Are12685VBPbe you12686PPyou prepared12687VVNprepare to12688TOto say12689VVsay that12690DTthat ?12691SENT? [MR. HO]12692LOC[MR. HO] ...12693:... Justice12694NPJustice Gorsuch12695NPGorsuch ,12696,, we12697PPwe 've12698VHPhave never12699RBnever taken12700VVNtake ...12701:... our12702PP$our clients12703NNSclient have12704VHPhave never12705RBnever taken12706VVNtake that12707DTthat position12708NNposition ,12709,, and12710CCand I12711PPI ...12712:... I12713PPI 'm12714VBPbe not12715RBnot aware12716JJaware of12717INof my12718PP$my organization12719NNorganization ever12720RBever taking12721VVGtake that12722DTthat position12723NNposition in12724INin litigation12725NNlitigation .12726SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12727LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] And12728CCand how12729JJhow ...12730:... how12731WRBhow about12732RBabout the12733DTthe underreporting12734VVGunderreport or12735CCor the12736DTthe folks12737NNSfolk who12738WPwho stop12739VVstop and12740CCand break12741VVbreak off12742RPoff answering12743VVGanswer the12744DTthe long12745JJlong form12746NNform and12747CCand ...12748:... and12749CCand we12750PPwe 're12751VBPbe asked12752VVNask to12753TOto believe12754VVbelieve that12755IN/thatthat that12756DTthat 's12757VBZbe solely12758RBsolely attributable12759JJattributable to12760TOto this12761DTthis question12762NNquestion ?12763SENT? We12764PPwe have12765VHPhave a12766DTa whole12767JJwhole bunch12768NNbunch of12769INof states12770NNSstate that12771WDTthat say12772VVPsay that12773IN/thatthat ,12774,, in12775INin fact12776NNfact ,12777,, the12778DTthe break-off12779NNbreak-off rate12780NNrate because12781INbecause of12782INof that12783DTthat question12784NNquestion ,12785,, at12786INat that12787DTthat question12788NNquestion ,12789,, is12790VBZbe something12791NNsomething like12792INlike 012793CD0 .12794SENT. 3612795CD@card@ percent12796NNpercent .12797SENT. [MR. HO]12798LOC[MR. HO] Well12799UHWell ...12800:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12801LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] So12802RBso that12803IN/thatthat it12804PPit 's12805VBZbe very12806RBvery difficult12807JJdifficult to12808TOto understand12809VVunderstand why12810WRBwhy that12811DTthat question12812NNquestion would12813MDwould be12814VBbe the12815DTthe cause12816NNcause of12817INof people12818NNSpeople stopping12819VVGstop answering12820NNanswering ,12821,, whereas12822INwhereas another12823DTanother possible12824JJpossible explanation12825NNexplanation that12826WDTthat has12827VHZhave n't12828RBn't been12829VBNbe explored12830VVNexplore ,12831,, as12832INas I12833PPI understand12834VVPunderstand it12835PPit at12836INat least12837JJSleast ,12838,, is12839VBZbe the12840DTthe length12841NNlength of12842INof the12843DTthe form12844NNform itself12845PPitself may12846MDmay deter12847VVdeter those12848DTthose with12849INwith less12850JJRless means12851NNSmean and12852CCand less12853JJRless time12854NNtime to12855TOto fill12856VVfill them12857PPthem out12858RPout ,12859,, just12860RBjust as12861RBas simple12862JJsimple as12863INas that12864DTthat ,12865,, and12866CCand we12867PPwe do12868VVPdo n't12869RBn't know12870VVknow .12871SENT. And12872CCand what12873WPwhat do12874VVPdo we12875PPwe do12876VVPdo with12877INwith the12878DTthe fact12879NNfact that12880IN/thatthat we12881PPwe do12882VVPdo n't12883RBn't know12884VVknow ?12885SENT? [MR. HO]12886LOC[MR. HO] Justice12887NPJustice Gorsuch12888NPGorsuch ,12889,, the12890DTthe Census12891NPCensus Bureau12892NPBureau 's12893POS's conclusion12894NNconclusion was12895VBDbe that12896IN/thatthat the12897DTthe most12898RBSmost likely12899JJlikely explanation12900NNexplanation was12901VBDbe the12902DTthe citizenship12903NNcitizenship question12904NNquestion .12905SENT. The12906DTthe only12907JJonly difference12908NNdifference in12909INin that12910DTthat comparative12911JJcomparative estimate12912NNestimate was12913VBDbe the12914DTthe presence12915NNpresence of12916INof a12917DTa non-citizen12918NNnon-citizen in12919INin a12920DTa household12921NNhousehold ,12922,, and12923CCand citizenship12924NNcitizenship is12925VBZbe obviously12926RBobviously the12927DTthe most12928RBSmost salient12929JJsalient question12930NNquestion that12931WDTthat goes12932VVZgo to12933TOto the12934DTthe difference12935NNdifference between12936INbetween those12937DTthose two12938CDtwo populations12939NNSpopulation .12940SENT. And12941CCand the12942DTthe number12943NNnumber on12944INon the12945DTthe break-off12946NNbreak-off rates12947NNSrate for12948INfor the12949DTthe Internet12950NPInternet ACS12951NPACS survey12952NNsurvey ,12953,, which12954WDTwhich I12955PPI believe12956VVPbelieve Your12957PP$your Honor12958NPHonor was12959VBDbe referring12960VVGrefer to12961TOto ,12962,, they12963PPthey showed12964VVDshow that12965IN/thatthat Hispanics12966NNSHispanic were12967VBDbe actually12968RBactually eight12969CDeight times12970NNStime as12971RBas likely12972JJlikely to12973TOto break12974VVbreak off12975RPoff in12976INin responding12977VVGrespond to12978TOto the12979DTthe ACS12980NPACS upon12981INupon encountering12982VVGencounter the12983DTthe citizenship12984NNcitizenship question12985NNquestion .12986SENT. Now12987RBnow ,12988,, by12989INby contrast12990NNcontrast ,12991,, there12992EXthere is12993VBZbe n't12994RBn't a12995DTa shred12996NNshred of12997INof evidence12998NNevidence in12999INin the13000DTthe administrative13001JJadministrative record13002NNrecord that13003WDTthat suggests13004VVZsuggest that13005IN/thatthat this13006DTthis question13007NNquestion will13008MDwill not13009RBnot have13010VHhave the13011DTthe effect13012NNeffect of13013INof harming13014VVGharm response13015NNresponse rates13016NNSrate or13017CCor will13018MDwill actually13019RBactually improve13020VVimprove the13021DTthe citizenship13022NNcitizenship data13023NNSdatum provided13024VVDprovide to13025TOto the13026DTthe Department13027NPDepartment of13028INof Justice13029NPJustice .13030SENT. But13031CCbut if13032INif I13033PPI could13034MDcould make13035VVmake one13036CDone other13037JJother point13038NNpoint in13039INin response13040NNresponse to13041TOto your13042PP$your earlier13043JJRearly question13044NNquestion ,13045,, Justice13046NPJustice Gorsuch13047NPGorsuch ,13048,, adding13049VVGadd the13050DTthe citizenship13051NNcitizenship question13052NNquestion does13053VVZdo n't13054RBn't even13055RBeven solve13056VVsolve that13057DTthat granularity13058NNgranularity problem13059NNproblem that13060IN/thatthat you13061PPyou referenced13062VVDreference ,13063,, and13064CCand here13065RBhere 's13066VBZbe why13067WRBwhy :13068:: Because13069INbecause the13070DTthe Census13071NPCensus Bureau13072NPBureau can13073MDcan only13074RBonly produce13075VVproduce estimates13076NNSestimate of13077INof citizenship13078NNcitizenship at13079INat the13080DTthe block13081NNblock level13082NNlevel .13083SENT. The13084DTthe government13085NNgovernment has13086VHZhave now13087RBnow conceded13088VVNconcede that13089IN/thatthat on13090INon page13091NNpage 1813092CD@card@ of13093INof their13094PP$their reply13095NNreply brief13096NNbrief ,13097,, which13098WDTwhich is13099VBZbe quite13100RBquite remarkable13101JJremarkable ,13102,, because13103INbecause the13104DTthe government13105NNgovernment 's13106POS's rationale13107NNrationale for13108INfor asking13109VVGask this13110DTthis question13111NNquestion has13112VHZhave been13113VBNbe to13114TOto provide13115VVprovide a13116DTa full13117JJfull count13118NNcount of13119INof citizenship13120NNcitizenship .13121SENT. And13122CCand because13123INbecause of13124INof the13125DTthe Census13126NPCensus Bureau13127NPBureau 's13128POS's disclosure13129NNdisclosure avoidance13130NNavoidance protocols13131NNSprotocol ,13132,, it13133PPit actually13134RBactually can13135MDcan 't13136RB't do13137VVPdo that13138IN/thatthat at13139INat the13140DTthe block13141NNblock level13142NNlevel .13143SENT. It13144PPit undermines13145VVZundermine the13146DTthe whole13147JJwhole rationale13148NNrationale for13149INfor adding13150VVGadd this13151DTthis question13152NNquestion ,13153,, and13154CCand the13155DTthe Secretary13156NPSecretary did13157VVDdo n't13158RBn't even13159RBeven address13160VVaddress it13161PPit in13162INin his13163PP$his decisional13164JJdecisional memo13165NNmemo ,13166,, which13167WDTwhich renders13168VVZrender his13169PP$his decision13170NNdecision arbitrary13171JJarbitrary and13172CCand capricious13173JJcapricious under13174INunder State13175NPState Farm13176NPFarm .13177SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13178LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] It13179PPit seems13180VVZseem to13181TOto me13182PPme ...13183:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]13184LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So13185RBso ...13186:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13187LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Go13188VVgo ahead13189RBahead .13190SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]13191LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...13192:... I13193PPI was13194VBDbe just13195RBjust ...13196:... what13197WPwhat is13198VBZbe the13199DTthe "13200``" it13201PPit "13202''" in13203INin that13204DTthat sentence13205NNsentence ?13206SENT? What13207WPWhat did13208VVDdo the13209DTthe Secretary13210NPSecretary not13211RBnot address13212VVaddress ?13213SENT? [MR. HO]13214LOC[MR. HO] He13215PPhe did13216VVDdo not13217RBnot address13218VVaddress the13219DTthe fact13220NNfact that13221IN/thatthat because13222INbecause of13223INof the13224DTthe bureau13225NNbureau 's13226POS's disclosure13227NNdisclosure avoidance13228NNavoidance protocols13229NNSprotocol ,13230,, it13231PPit can13232MDcan only13233RBonly provide13234VVprovide estimates13235NNSestimate of13236INof citizenship13237NNcitizenship at13238INat the13239DTthe block13240NNblock level13241NNlevel .13242SENT. If13243INif I13244PPI could13245MDcould ,13246,, let13247VVlet me13248PPme explain13249VVexplain why13250WRBwhy .13251SENT. The13252DTthe statute13253NNstatute requires13254VVZrequire the13255DTthe Census13256NPCensus Bureau13257NPBureau not13258RBnot to13259TOto disclose13260VVdisclose information13261NNinformation that13262WDTthat could13263MDcould result13264VVresult in13265INin the13266DTthe identification13267NNidentification of13268INof a13269DTa person13270NNperson 's13271POS's census13272NNcensus responses13273NNSresponse .13274SENT. If13275INif you13276PPyou have13277VHPhave 10013278CD@card@ people13279NNSpeople living13280VVGlive on13281INon a13282DTa block13283NNblock and13284CCand the13285DTthe Census13286NPCensus Bureau13287NPBureau says13288VVZsay ,13289,, well13290RBwell ,13291,, there13292EXthere are13293VBPbe 10013294CD@card@ citizens13295NNScitizen there13296RBthere ,13297,, you13298PPyou will13299MDwill have13300VHhave necessarily13301RBnecessarily identified13302VVNidentify all13303DTall of13304INof their13305PP$their census13306NNcensus responses13307NNSresponse .13308SENT. So13309RBso what13310WPwhat the13311DTthe bureau13312NNbureau does13313VVZdo is13314VBZbe it13315PPit alters13316VVZalter demographic13317JJdemographic totals13318NNStotal for13319INfor census13320NNcensus blocks13321NNSblock before13322INbefore publishing13323VVGpublish them13324PPthem .13325SENT. That13326DTthat means13327VVZmean that13328IN/thatthat that13329DTthat data13330NNdata is13331VBZbe an13332DTan approximation13333NNapproximation ,13334,, it13335PPit 's13336VBZbe an13337DTan estimate13338NNestimate ,13339,, just13340RBjust like13341INlike the13342DTthe ACS13343NPACS data13344NNSdatum that13345IN/thatthat the13346DTthe Department13347NPDepartment of13348INof Justice13349NPJustice currently13350RBcurrently relies13351VVZrely on13352INon .13353SENT. And13354CCand here13355RBhere 's13356VBZbe what13357WPwhat 's13358VBZbe critical13359JJcritical .13360SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]13361LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well13362UHWell ,13363,, this13364DTthis is13365VBZbe ...13366:... this13367DTthis gets13368VVZget really13369RBreally ,13370,, really13371RBreally technical13372JJtechnical ,13373,, but13374CCbut ...13375:... well13376RBwell ,13377,, and13378CCand your13379PP$your ...13380:... I13381PPI 'm13382VBPbe sorry13383JJsorry .13384SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13385LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] No13386NPNo ,13387,, go13388VVPgo ahead13389RBahead .13390SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]13391LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] That's13392NPThat's ...13393:... that13394WDTthat 's13395VBZbe fine13396JJfine .13397SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13398LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Okay13399NPOkay .13400SENT. Thank13401VVthank you13402PPyou ,13403,, counsel13404NNcounsel .13405SENT. [MR. HO]13406LOC[MR. HO] Thank13407VVthank you13408PPyou ,13409,, Your13410PP$your Honors13411NNShonors .13412SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13413LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Mr13414NPMr .13415SENT. Letter13416NNletter .13417SENT.

[MR. LETTER]13418LOC[MR. LETTER] Mr13419NPMr .13420SENT. Chief13421NPChief Justice13422NPJustice ,13423,, and13424CCand may13425MDmay it13426PPit please13427VVplease the13428DTthe Court13429NPCourt :13430:: I13431PPI just13432RBjust want13433VVPwant to13434TOto say13435VVsay right13436JJright upfront13437NNupfront the13438DTthe Speaker13439NPSpeaker of13440INof the13441DTthe House13442NPHouse wishes13443VVZwish to13444TOto thank13445VVthank the13446DTthe Justices13447NPSJustices for13448INfor their13449PP$their courtesy13450NNcourtesy in13451INin hearing13452NNhearing from13453INfrom the13454DTthe House13455NPHouse today13456NNtoday .13457SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13458LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Tell13459VVtell her13460PPher she13461PPshe 's13462VBZbe welcome13463JJwelcome .13464SENT. [13465SYM[ LAUGHTER13466NNlaughter ]13467SYM] [MR. LETTER]13468LOC[MR. LETTER] Thank13469VVthank you13470PPyou .13471SENT. I13472PPI 'll13473MDwill pass13474VVpass that13475IN/thatthat along13476INalong to13477TOto her13478PPher ,13479,, Mr13480NPMr .13481SENT. Chief13482NPChief Justice13483NPJustice .13484SENT. I13485PPI want13486VVPwant to13487TOto hit13488VVhit just13489RBjust a13490DTa couple13491NNcouple of13492INof points13493NNSpoint ,13494,, but13495CCbut one13496CDone of13497INof the13498DTthe ones13499NNSone I13500PPI want13501VVPwant to13502TOto hit13503VVhit right13504JJright upfront13505NNupfront is13506VBZbe something13507NNsomething that13508WDTthat ...13509:... that13510IN/thatthat General13511NPGeneral Underwood13512NPUnderwood said13513VVDsay and13514CCand I13515PPI think13516VVPthink bears13517VVZbear some13518DTsome emphasis13519NNemphasis ,13520,, which13521WDTwhich is13522VBZbe the13523DTthe ...13524:... remember13525VVPremember that13526IN/thatthat the13527DTthe ...13528:... the13529DTthe census13530NNcensus that13531IN/thatthat we13532PPwe 're13533VBPbe talking13534VVGtalk about13535RBabout here13536RBhere is13537VBZbe the13538DTthe decennial13539JJdecennial census13540NNcensus provided13541VVNprovide for13542INfor in13543INin the13544DTthe Constitution13545NPConstitution ,13546,, of13547INof utmost13548JJutmost importance13549NNimportance to13550TOto the13551DTthe House13552NPHouse of13553INof Representatives13554NPSRepresentatives .13555SENT. That13556DTthat provision13557NNprovision obviously13558RBobviously is13559VBZbe the13560DTthe ground13561NNground ...13562:... has13563VHZhave to13564TOto be13565VBbe the13566DTthe grounding13567NNgrounding for13568INfor the13569DTthe statute13570NNstatute that13571WDTthat is13572VBZbe being13573VBGbe applied13574VVNapply here13575RBhere .13576SENT. And13577CCand so13578INso anything13579NNanything that13580WDTthat undermines13581VVZundermine the13582DTthe accuracy13583NNaccuracy of13584INof the13585DTthe actual13586JJactual enumeration13587NNenumeration is13588VBZbe immediately13589RBimmediately a13590DTa problem13591NNproblem .13592SENT. So13593RBso there13594EXthere 's13595VHZhave been13596VBNbe a13597DTa lot13598NNlot of13599INof discussion13600NNdiscussion here13601RBhere ,13602,, quite13603RBquite properly13604RBproperly ,13605,, because13606INbecause of13607INof the13608DTthe way13609NNway this13610DTthis case13611NNcase has13612VHZhave been13613VBNbe briefed13614VVNbrief ,13615,, about13616RBabout will13617MDwill this13618RBthis help13619VVhelp the13620DTthe Justice13621NPJustice Department13622NPDepartment and13623CCand the13624DTthe Voting13625NPVoting Rights13626NPSRights Act13627NPAct ,13628,, et13629NPet cetera13630NPcetera .13631SENT. And13632CCand that13633WDTthat may13634MDmay be13635VBbe a13636DTa very13637RBvery important13638JJimportant point13639NNpoint ,13640,, but13641CCbut it13642PPit is13643VBZbe not13644RBnot why13645WRBwhy the13646DTthe Census13647NPCensus Bureau13648NPBureau carries13649VVZcarry out13650RPout an13651DTan actual13652JJactual enumeration13653NNenumeration ,13654,, which13655WDTwhich goes13656VVZgo to13657TOto the13658DTthe apportionment13659NNapportionment of13660INof representatives13661NNSrepresentative among13662INamong the13663DTthe states13664NNSstate and13665CCand then13666RBthen distribution13667NNdistribution within13668INwithin the13669DTthe states13670NNSstate .13671SENT. So13672RBso ,13673,, if13674INif there13675EXthere is13676VBZbe something13677NNsomething that13678WDTthat undermines13679VVZundermine the13680DTthe accuracy13681NNaccuracy of13682INof that13683DTthat count13684NNcount ,13685,, even13686RBeven if13687INif it13688PPit 's13689VBZbe important13690JJimportant for13691INfor other13692JJother reasons13693NNSreason ,13694,, that13695WDTthat is13696VBZbe both13697CCboth a13698DTa statutory13699JJstatutory violation13700NNviolation and13701CCand ,13702,, therefore13703RBtherefore ,13704,, a13705DTa violation13706NNviolation of13707INof the13708DTthe Administrative13709NPAdministrative Procedure13710NPProcedure Act13711NPAct ,13712,, and13713CCand a13714DTa constitutional13715JJconstitutional violation13716NNviolation .13717SENT. Now13718RBnow this13719DTthis Court13720NPCourt does13721VVZdo not13722RBnot have13723VHhave to13724TOto reach13725VVreach the13726DTthe constitutional13727JJconstitutional question13728NNquestion because13729INbecause it13730PPit is13731VBZbe a13732DTa statutory13733JJstatutory violation13734NNviolation .13735SENT. I13736PPI ...13737:... [JUSTICE ALITO]13738LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But13739CCbut do13740VVPdo you13741PPyou think13742VVPthink that13743IN/thatthat any13744DTany decrease13745NNdecrease in13746INin the13747DTthe actual13748JJactual count13749NNcount ,13750,, if13751INif ...13752:... if13753INif you13754PPyou add13755VVPadd any13756DTany question13757NNquestion beyond13758INbeyond counting13759VVGcount people13760NNSpeople ,13761,, and13762CCand that13763WDTthat decreases13764VVZdecrease the13765DTthe actual13766JJactual count13767NNcount to13768TOto any13769DTany degree13770NNdegree ,13771,, then13772RBthen that13773DTthat additional13774JJadditional question13775NNquestion is13776VBZbe improper13777JJimproper ?13778SENT? [MR. LETTER]13779LOC[MR. LETTER] Justice13780NPJustice Alito13781NPAlito ,13782,, I13783PPI ...13784:... I13785PPI 'm13786VBPbe sure13787RBsure that13788RBthat ...13789:... that13790IN/thatthat the13791DTthe Court13792NPCourt would13793MDwould find13794VVfind there13795EXthere 's13796VBZbe a13797DTa de13798NPde minimis13799NPminimis exception13800NNexception .13801SENT. There13802EXthere 's13803VBZbe no13804DTno ...13805:... no13806DTno doubt13807NNdoubt about13808INabout that13809DTthat .13810SENT. So13811RBso where13812WRBwhere this13813DTthis Court13814NPCourt would13815MDwould draw13816VVdraw that13817DTthat line13818NNline ,13819,, I13820PPI do13821VVPdo n't13822RBn't know13823VVknow .13824SENT. What13825WPWhat I13826PPI ...13827:... I13828PPI can13829MDcan tell13830VVtell you13831PPyou ,13832,, and13833CCand I'm13834NPI'm ...13835:... I13836PPI 'm13837VBPbe sure13838JJsure you13839PPyou know13840VVPknow this13841DTthis ,13842,, but13843CCbut I13844PPI 'll13845MDwill just13846RBjust ...13847:... from13848INfrom the13849DTthe ...13850:... this13851DTthis Court13852NPCourt said13853VVDsay in13854INin the13855DTthe Wisconsin13856NPWisconsin case13857NNcase that13858WDTthat ...13859:... a13860DTa question13861NNquestion there13862EXthere was13863VBDbe could13864MDcould a13865DTa statistical13866JJstatistical adjustment13867NNadjustment be13868VBbe made13869VVNmake ,13870,, and13871CCand this13872DTthis Court13873NPCourt set13874VVDset the13875DTthe standard13876NNstandard of13877INof what13878WPwhat actual13879JJactual enumeration13880NNenumeration means13881NNSmean and13882CCand it13883PPit says13884VVZsay "13885``" a13886DTa reasonable13887JJreasonable relationship13888NNrelationship to13889TOto the13890DTthe accomplishment13891NNaccomplishment of13892INof an13893DTan actual13894JJactual enumeration13895NNenumeration .13896SENT. "13897''" And13898CCand this13899DTthis discussion13900NNdiscussion about13901INabout the13902DTthe importance13903NNimportance of13904INof voting13905VVGvote rights13906NNSright data13907NNSdatum obviously13908RBobviously does13909VVZdo not13910RBnot bear13911VVbear a13912DTa reasonable13913JJreasonable relationship13914NNrelationship to13915TOto the13916DTthe accomplishment13917NNaccomplishment of13918INof an13919DTan actual13920JJactual ...13921:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]13922LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Mr13923NNMr .13924SENT. Letter13925NNletter ,13926,, I13927PPI 'm13928VBPbe sure13929JJsure you13930PPyou 've13931VHPhave given13932VVNgive this13933DTthis some13934RBsome thought13935VVNthink ,13936,, but13937CCbut ...13938:... I13939PPI know13940VVPknow you13941PPyou have13942VHPhave .13943SENT. In13944INin terms13945NNSterm of13946INof assessing13947VVGassess what13948WPwhat a13949DTa reasonable13950JJreasonable relationship13951NNrelationship is13952VBZbe ,13953,, what13954WPwhat do13955VVPdo we13956PPwe do13957VVPdo with13958INwith the13959DTthe history13960NNhistory and13961CCand the13962DTthe fact13963NNfact that13964IN/thatthat this13965DTthis question13966NNquestion has13967VHZhave been13968VBNbe on13969INon for13970INfor what13971WPwhat a13972DTa long13973JJlong time13974NNtime was13975VBDbe the13976DTthe only13977JJonly form13978NNform in13979INin the13980DTthe census13981NNcensus through13982INthrough almost13983RBalmost all13984DTall of13985INof our13986PP$our history13987NNhistory ,13988,, and13989CCand it13990PPit continues13991VVZcontinue to13992TOto be13993VBbe asked13994VVNask today13995NNtoday in13996INin the13997DTthe long13998JJlong form13999NNform or14000CCor in14001INin the14002DTthe ACS14003NPACS .14004SENT. It14005PPit 's14006VBZbe not14007RBnot like14008INlike this14009DTthis question14010NNquestion or14011CCor anybody14012NNanybody in14013INin the14014DTthe room14015NNroom is14016VBZbe suggesting14017VVGsuggest that14018IN/thatthat the14019DTthe question14020NNquestion is14021VBZbe improper14022JJimproper to14023TOto ask14024VVask in14025INin some14026DTsome way14027NNway ,14028,, shape14029NNshape ,14030,, or14031CCor form14032NNform .14033SENT. And14034CCand what14035WPwhat we14036PPwe do14037VVPdo as14038RBas well14039RBwell with14040INwith the14041DTthe evidence14042NNevidence of14043INof practice14044NNpractice around14045INaround the14046DTthe world14047NNworld and14048CCand virtually14049RBvirtually every14050DTevery English-speaking14051JJEnglish-speaking country14052NNcountry and14053CCand a14054DTa great14055JJgreat many14056JJmany others14057NNSother besides14058RBbesides ask14059VVPask this14060DTthis question14061NNquestion in14062INin their14063PP$their censuses14064NNScensus ?14065SENT? So14066RBso I14067PPI 'm14068VBPbe sure14069JJsure you14070PPyou 've14071VHPhave given14072VVNgive consideration14073NNconsideration ...14074:... thought14075NNthought ...14076:... thoughtful14077JJthoughtful consideration14078NNconsideration to14079TOto those14080DTthose questions14081NNSquestion .14082SENT. [MR. LETTER]14083LOC[MR. LETTER] Absolutely14084RBabsolutely ,14085,, Your14086PP$your Honor14087NPHonor ,14088,, although14089INalthough I14090PPI can14091MDcan tell14092VVtell that14093IN/thatthat you14094PPyou also14095RBalso have14096VHPhave .14097SENT. First14098JJfirst of14099INof all14100DTall ,14101,, I14102PPI do14103VVPdo n't14104RBn't know14105VVknow if14106INif the14107DTthe other14108JJother countries14109NNScountry that14110WDTthat are14111VBPbe listed14112VVNlist ,14113,, for14114INfor instance14115NNinstance ,14116,, in14117INin the14118DTthe ...14119:... the14120DTthe U14121NPU .14122SENT. N14123NPN .14124SENT. recommendations14125NNSrecommendation have14126VHPhave an14127DTan actual14128JJactual Enumeration14129NNenumeration Clause14130NNclause written14131VVNwrite into14132INinto their14133PP$their constitution14134NNconstitution that14135WDTthat is14136VBZbe of14137INof paramount14138JJparamount importance14139NNimportance .14140SENT. So14141RBso I14142PPI 'm14143VBPbe not14144RBnot sure14145JJsure that14146IN/thatthat ,14147,, when14148WRBwhen ...14149:... when14150WRBwhen the14151DTthe U14152NPU .14153SENT. N14154NPN .14155SENT. made14156VVNmake that14157DTthat recommendation14158NNrecommendation ,14159,, that14160IN/thatthat that14161DTthat matters14162NNSmatter for14163INfor the14164DTthe United14165NPUnited States14166NPSStates .14167SENT. Second14168RBsecond ,14169,, Your14170PP$your Honor14171NPHonor ,14172,, the14173DTthe ...14174:... if14175INif ...14176:... there14177RBthere ...14178:... there14179EXthere are14180VBPbe other14181JJother factors14182NNSfactor that14183WDTthat would14184MDwould undermine14185VVundermine actual14186JJactual enumeration14187NNenumeration .14188SENT. There14189EXthere is14190VBZbe no14191DTno evidence14192NNevidence in14193INin the14194DTthe record14195NNrecord here14196RBhere .14197SENT. As14198INas the14199DTthe Chief14200NPChief Justice14201NPJustice pointed14202VVDpoint out14203RPout ,14204,, we14205PPwe 're14206VBPbe dealing14207VVGdeal with14208INwith a14209DTa record14210NNrecord here14211RBhere .14212SENT. It14213PPit may14214MDmay be14215VBbe that14216IN/thatthat some14217DTsome people14218NNSpeople find14219VVPfind questions14220NNSquestion about14221RBabout gender14222VVPgender now14223RBnow offensive14224JJoffensive or14225CCor maybe14226RBmaybe in14227INin the14228DTthe future14229NNfuture that14230WDTthat will14231MDwill be14232VBbe deemed14233VVNdeem offensive14234JJoffensive and14235CCand that14236WDTthat would14237MDwould undermine14238VVundermine the14239DTthe accuracy14240NNaccuracy of14241INof the14242DTthe ...14243:... of14244INof the14245DTthe actual14246JJactual enumeration14247NNenumeration .14248SENT. We14249PPwe do14250VVPdo n't14251RBn't have14252VHhave any14253DTany evidence14254NNevidence on14255INon that14256DTthat .14257SENT. What14258WPWhat we14259PPwe do14260VVPdo know14261VVknow ,14262,, Your14263PP$your Honor14264NPHonor ,14265,, as14266INas you14267PPyou 've14268VHPhave quite14269RBquite correctly14270RBcorrectly pointed14271VVNpoint out14272RPout ,14273,, we14274PPwe have14275VHPhave a14276DTa history14277NNhistory of14278INof this14279DTthis ,14280,, but14281CCbut what14282WPwhat we14283PPwe do14284VVPdo know14285VVknow now14286RBnow is14287VBZbe the14288DTthe experts14289NNSexpert right14290RBright now14291RBnow say14292VVPsay that14293IN/thatthat this14294DTthis question14295NNquestion ,14296,, if14297INif it14298PPit is14299VBZbe put14300VVNput on14301INon the14302DTthe ...14303:... the14304DTthe form14305NNform ,14306,, which14307WDTwhich ,14308,, remember14309VVPremember ,14310,, is14311VBZbe the14312DTthe only14313JJonly form14314NNform right14315RBright now14316RBnow for14317INfor the14318DTthe actual14319JJactual enumeration14320NNenumeration ,14321,, that14322WDTthat will14323MDwill cause14324VVcause ...14325:... that14326WDTthat will14327MDwill make14328VVmake the14329DTthe undercount14330NNundercount worse14331RBRworse .14332SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]14333LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Mr14334NPMr .14335SENT. Letter14336NNletter ,14337,, the14338NPthe ...14339:... Congress14340NPCongress has14341VHZhave the14342DTthe primary14343JJprimary control14344NNcontrol over14345INover what14346WPwhat the14347DTthe census14348NNcensus will14349MDwill be14350VBbe ,14351,, not14352RBnot the14353DTthe executive14354NNexecutive ,14355,, and14356CCand Congress14357NPCongress has14358VHZhave been14359VBNbe alerted14360VVNalert to14361TOto this14362DTthis citizenship14363NNcitizenship question14364NNquestion for14365INfor some14366DTsome time14367NNtime ,14368,, and14369CCand it14370PPit has14371VHZhave done14372VVNdo nothing14373NNnothing about14374INabout it14375PPit .14376SENT. So14377RBso one14378CDone question14379NNquestion is14380VBZbe ,14381,, who14382WPwho should14383MDshould decide14384VVdecide ?14385SENT? Congress14386NPCongress is14387VBZbe silent14388JJsilent .14389SENT. Should14390MDshould the14391DTthe Court14392NPCourt then14393RBthen step14394VVstep in14395INin ?14396SENT? [MR. LETTER]14397LOC[MR. LETTER] It14398PPit 's14399VBZbe a14400DTa very14401RBvery fair14402JJfair question14403NNquestion ,14404,, Your14405PP$your Honor14406NPHonor .14407SENT. Two14408CDTwo responses14409NNSresponse .14410SENT. One14411CDOne ,14412,, I14413PPI think14414VVPthink that14415IN/thatthat this14416DTthis is14417VBZbe a14418DTa very14419RBvery ironic14420JJironic point14421NNpoint for14422INfor General14423NPGeneral Francisco14424NPFrancisco to14425TOto be14426VBbe making14427VVGmake .14428SENT. He14429PPhe has14430VHZhave said14431VVNsay ...14432:... he14433PPhe 's14434VBZbe emphasized14435VVNemphasize in14436INin his14437PP$his brief14438JJbrief Congress14439NPCongress knows14440VVZknow about14441INabout this14442DTthis ,14443,, Congress14444NPCongress should14445MDshould do14446VVdo something14447NNsomething .14448SENT. This14449DTthis ...14450:... the14451DTthe Court14452NPCourt can14453MDcan take14454VVtake judicial14455JJjudicial notice14456NNnotice of14457INof this14458DTthis because14459INbecause it14460PPit 's14461VBZbe in14462INin the14463DTthe public14464JJpublic record14465NNrecord .14466SENT. The14467DTthe Secretary14468NPSecretary of14469INof Commerce14470NPCommerce has14471VHZhave been14472VBNbe called14473VVNcall before14474INbefore Congress14475NPCongress to14476TOto explain14477VVexplain what14478WPwhat he14479PPhe did14480VVDdo here14481RBhere ,14482,, and14483CCand Assistant14484NPAssistant Attorney14485NPAttorney General14486NPGeneral Gore14487NPGore ,14488,, the14489DTthe one14490CDone ,14491,, you14492PPyou know14493VVPknow ,14494,, about14495INabout the14496DTthe ...14497:... the14498DTthe author14499NNauthor of14500INof the14501DTthe ...14502:... the14503DTthe request14504NNrequest by14505INby the14506DTthe Justice14507NPJustice Department14508NPDepartment ,14509,, has14510VHZhave been14511VBNbe called14512VVNcall to14513TOto Congress14514NPCongress .14515SENT. They14516PPthey have14517VHPhave been14518VBNbe declining14519VVGdecline to14520TOto answer14521VVanswer .14522SENT. They14523PPthey 're14524VBPbe not14525RBnot giving14526VVGgive Congress14527NPCongress the14528DTthe information14529NNinformation it14530PPit requests14531VVZrequest because14532INbecause they14533PPthey say14534VVPsay there14535EXthere 's14536VBZbe litigation14537NNlitigation going14538VVGgo on14539INon .14540SENT. And14541CCand ,14542,, I14543PPI repeat14544VVPrepeat ,14545,, this14546DTthis is14547VBZbe a14548DTa matter14549NNmatter of14550INof public14551JJpublic record14552NNrecord .14553SENT. So14554RBso it14555PPit 's14556VBZbe ironic14557JJironic for14558INfor General14559NPGeneral Francisco14560NPFrancisco to14561TOto be14562VBbe saying14563VVGsay :14564:: This14565DTthis is14566VBZbe for14567INfor Congress14568NPCongress .14569SENT. Well14570UHwell ,14571,, if14572INif that14573WDTthat 's14574VBZbe for14575INfor Congress14576NPCongress ,14577,, obviously14578RBobviously ,14579,, the14580DTthe House14581NPHouse needs14582VVZneed the14583DTthe information14584NNinformation .14585SENT. And14586CCand yet14587RByet we14588PPwe 're14589VBPbe being14590VBGbe told14591VVNtell we14592PPwe can14593MDcan 't14594RB't have14595VHhave the14596DTthe information14597NNinformation because14598INbecause it14599PPit 's14600VBZbe ...14601:... because14602INbecause it14603PPit 's14604VBZbe only14605RBonly for14606INfor you14607PPyou .14608SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]14609LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I14610PPI thought14611VVDthink all14612PDTall the14613DTthe information14614NNinformation available14615JJavailable ,14616,, as14617INas I14618PPI understand14619VVPunderstand it14620PPit ,14621,, leads14622VVZlead to14623TOto only14624RBonly one14625CDone answer14626NNanswer ,14627,, and14628CCand so14629RBso why14630WRBwhy is14631VBZbe n't14632RBn't that14633DTthat answer14634NNanswer sufficient14635JJsufficient for14636INfor them14637PPthem to14638TOto take14639VVtake whatever14640WDTwhatever action14641NNaction they14642PPthey consider14643VVPconsider appropriate14644JJappropriate ?14645SENT? [MR. LETTER]14646LOC[MR. LETTER] The14647NPThe ...14648:... I14649PPI 'm14650VBPbe sorry14651JJsorry ,14652,, Chief14653NPChief Justice14654NPJustice .14655SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]14656LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well14657UHwell ,14658,, we14659PPwe 've14660VHPhave been14661VBNbe told14662VVNtell there14663EXthere was14664VBDbe no14665DTno basis14666NNbasis for14667INfor the14668DTthe Secretary14669NPSecretary to14670TOto make14671VVmake any14672DTany decision14673NNdecision ,14674,, other14675JJother than14676INthan the14677DTthe recommendation14678NNrecommendation that14679WDTthat was14680VBDbe submitted14681VVNsubmit to14682TOto him14683PPhim by14684INby the14685DTthe bureau14686NNbureau ,14687,, because14688INbecause that14689WDTthat 's14690VBZbe the14691DTthe evidence14692NNevidence .14693SENT. That14694DTthat 's14695VBZbe the14696DTthe scientific14697JJscientific evidence14698NNevidence .14699SENT. And14700CCand so14701RBso there14702EXthere 's14703VBZbe no14704DTno room14705NNroom for14706INfor the14707DTthe exercise14708NNexercise of14709INof any14710DTany discretion14711NNdiscretion .14712SENT. So14713RBso what14714WPwhat information14715NNinformation ...14716:... what14717WPwhat more14718JJRmore information14719NNinformation does14720VVZdo the14721DTthe Congress14722NPCongress need14723VVPneed to14724TOto address14725VVaddress the14726DTthe problem14727NNproblem ?14728SENT? [MR. LETTER]14729LOC[MR. LETTER] We14730PPwe want14731VVPwant to14732TOto know14733VVknow what14734WPwhat ...14735:... you14736PPyou ...14737:... you14738PPyou decided14739VVDdecide otherwise14740RBotherwise .14741SENT. Why14742WRBwhy did14743VVDdo you14744PPyou decide14745VVPdecide ?14746SENT? As14747INas we14748PPwe know14749VVPknow ,14750,, his14751PP$his ...14752:... his14753PP$his ...14754:... his14755PP$his letter14756NNletter provides14757VVZprovide not14758RBnot ...14759:... his14760PP$his memo14761NNmemo provides14762VVZprovide not14763RBnot much14764JJmuch information14765NNinformation .14766SENT. This14767DTthis ...14768:... the14769DTthe Justices14770NPSJustices here14771RBhere today14772NNtoday have14773VHPhave been14774VBNbe asking14775VVGask these14776DTthese key14777JJkey questions14778NNSquestion .14779SENT. So14780RBso we14781PPwe want14782VVPwant to14783TOto know14784VVknow ,14785,, what14786WPwhat made14787VVDmake you14788PPyou do14789VVPdo ...14790:... what14791WPwhat made14792VVDmake you14793PPyou decide14794VVPdecide this14795DTthis ?14796SENT? Was14797VBDbe this14798DTthis just14799RBjust a14800DTa political14801JJpolitical decision14802NNdecision ?14803SENT? [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]14804LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well14805UHwell ,14806,, I14807PPI thought14808VVDthink Justice14809NPJustice Ginsburg14810NPGinsburg 's14811POS's question14812NNquestion went14813VVDgo more14814RBRmore to14815TOto why14816WRBwhy does14817VVZdo n't14818RBn't Congress14819NPCongress prohibit14820VVPprohibit the14821DTthe asking14822NNasking of14823INof a14824DTa citizenship14825NNcitizenship question14826NNquestion in14827INin the14828DTthe same14829JJsame way14830NNway that14831IN/thatthat Congress14832NPCongress has14833VHZhave explicitly14834RBexplicitly provided14835VVNprovide that14836IN/thatthat no14837DTno one14838CDone can14839MDcan be14840VBbe compelled14841VVNcompel to14842TOto provide14843VVprovide religious14844JJreligious information14845NNinformation ?14846SENT? [MR. LETTER]14847LOC[MR. LETTER] Right14848RBright .14849SENT. And14850CCand so14851RBso that14852WDTthat is14853VBZbe something14854NNsomething that14855IN/thatthat Congress14856NPCongress could14857MDcould attempt14858VVattempt to14859TOto do14860VVdo ,14861,, yes14862UHyes ,14863,, and14864CCand that14865DTthat is14866VBZbe one14867CDone of14868INof the14869DTthe things14870NNSthing that14871WDTthat would14872MDwould be14873VBbe ...14874:... would14875MDwould be14876VBbe asked14877VVNask about14878RBabout .14879SENT. But14880CCbut ,14881,, as14882INas we14883PPwe know14884VVPknow ,14885,, that14886WDTthat does14887VVZdo n't14888RBn't stop14889VVstop this14890DTthis Court14891NPCourt from14892INfrom interpreting14893VVGinterpret the14894DTthe statute14895NNstatute and14896CCand the14897DTthe Constitution14898NPConstitution .14899SENT. As14900INas we14901PPwe know14902VVPknow ,14903,, this14904DTthis Court14905NPCourt is14906VBZbe the14907DTthe final14908JJfinal word14909NNword on14910INon the14911DTthe Constitution14912NPConstitution .14913SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]14914LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] On14915INon the14916DTthe ...14917:... on14918INon the14919DTthe statute14920NNstatute ,14921,, I14922PPI had14923VHDhave one14924CDone question14925NNquestion ,14926,, which14927WDTwhich is14928VBZbe you14929PPyou make14930VVPmake a14931DTa good14932JJgood first14933JJfirst principles14934NNSprinciple point14935NNpoint about14936INabout enumeration14937NNenumeration being14938VBGbe the14939DTthe purpose14940NNpurpose of14941INof the14942DTthe census14943NNcensus .14944SENT. But14945CCbut it14946PPit turns14947VVZturn out14948RPout that14949IN/thatthat the14950DTthe census14951NNcensus ,14952,, as14953INas you14954PPyou know14955VVPknow ,14956,, has14957VHZhave been14958VBNbe used14959VVNuse for14960INfor lots14961NNSlot of14962INof other14963JJother statistical14964JJstatistical and14965CCand demographic14966JJdemographic collection14967NNcollection purposes14968NNSpurpose throughout14969INthroughout ...14970:... throughout14971INthroughout our14972PP$our history14973NNhistory .14974SENT. So14975RBso it14976PPit 's14977VBZbe not14978RBnot just14979RBjust for14980INfor enumeration14981NNenumeration .14982SENT. And14983CCand the14984DTthe statute14985NNstatute that14986IN/thatthat Congress14987NPCongress has14988VHZhave passed14989VVNpass gives14990VVZgive huge14991JJhuge discretion14992NNdiscretion to14993TOto the14994DTthe Secretary14995NPSecretary how14996WRBhow to14997TOto fill14998VVfill out14999RPout the15000DTthe form15001NNform ,15002,, what15003WPwhat to15004TOto put15005VVput on15006INon the15007DTthe form15008NNform .15009SENT. So15010RBso how15011WRBhow are15012VBPbe we15013PPwe to15014TOto think15015VVthink about15016INabout enumeration15017NNenumeration when15018WRBwhen the15019DTthe history15020NNhistory and15021CCand the15022DTthe statute15023NNstatute suggests15024VVZsuggest that15025IN/thatthat there15026EXthere is15027VBZbe more15028JJRmore than15029INthan just15030RBjust enumeration15031NNenumeration that15032WDTthat 's15033VBZbe at15034INat stake15035NNstake here15036RBhere ?15037SENT? [MR. LETTER]15038LOC[MR. LETTER] Your15039PP$your Honor15040NPHonor is15041VBZbe exactly15042RBexactly right15043JJright .15044SENT. The15045DTthe ...15046:... the15047DTthe census15048NNcensus information15049NNinformation ,15050,, the15051DTthe census15052NNcensus data15053NNSdatum ,15054,, are15055VBPbe used15056VVNuse for15057INfor all15058DTall sorts15059NNSsort of15060INof things15061NNSthing that15062WDTthat are15063VBPbe very15064RBvery important15065JJimportant .15066SENT. Remember15067VVremember ,15068,, the15069DTthe Census15070NPCensus Bureau15071NPBureau does15072VVZdo things15073NNSthing way15074NNway beyond15075INbeyond just15076RBjust the15077DTthe decennial15078JJdecennial census15079NNcensus actual15080JJactual enumeration15081NNenumeration .15082SENT. But15083CCbut ,15084,, again15085RBagain ,15086,, this15087DTthis Court15088NPCourt was15089VBDbe very15090RBvery clear15091JJclear ,15092,, and15093CCand ...15094:... and15095CCand ,15096,, by15097INby the15098DTthe way15099NNway ,15100,, the15101DTthe other15102JJother thing15103NNthing is15104VBZbe General15105NPGeneral Francisco15106NPFrancisco has15107VHZhave argued15108VVNargue no15109DTno review15110NNreview .15111SENT. This15112DTthis Court15113NPCourt has15114VHZhave reviewed15115VVNreview how15116WRBhow the15117DTthe actual15118JJactual enumeration15119NNenumeration has15120VHZhave taken15121VVNtake place15122NNplace ,15123,, I15124PPI think15125VVPthink ,15126,, about15127RBabout five15128CDfive times15129NNStime .15130SENT. So15131RBso there15132EXthere 's15133VBZbe clearly15134RBclearly judicial15135JJjudicial review15136NNreview here15137RBhere .15138SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15139LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well15140UHWell ,15141,, assuming15142VVGassume there15143EXthere is15144VBZbe review15145NNreview and15146CCand assuming15147VVGassume it15148PPit 's15149VBZbe arbitrary15150JJarbitrary and15151CCand capricious15152JJcapricious ,15153,, as15154INas you15155PPyou know15156VVPknow ,15157,, it15158PPit 's15159VBZbe deferential15160JJdeferential .15161SENT. [MR. LETTER]15162LOC[MR. LETTER] Yes15163NPYes .15164SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15165LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And15166CCand the15167DTthe question15168NNquestion I15169PPI think15170VVPthink here15171RBhere is15172VBZbe a15173DTa policy15174NNpolicy judgment15175NNjudgment that15176IN/thatthat it15177PPit 's15178VBZbe more15179RBRmore important15180JJimportant to15181TOto get15182VVget accurate15183JJaccurate citizenship15184NNcitizenship information15185NNinformation even15186RBeven at15187INat the15188DTthe expense15189NNexpense ,15190,, potentially15191RBpotentially ,15192,, of15193INof a15194DTa slight15195JJslight decrease15196NNdecrease ,15197,, potentially15198RBpotentially ,15199,, in15200INin response15201NNresponse rates15202NNSrate .15203SENT. And15204CCand the15205DTthe question15206NNquestion is15207VBZbe :15208:: Given15209VVNgive the15210DTthe statutes15211NNSstatute ,15212,, why15213WRBwhy does15214VVZdo that15215IN/thatthat judgment15216NNjudgment fall15217NNfall below15218INbelow the15219DTthe standard15220NNstandard of15221INof reasonableness15222NNreasonableness in15223INin assessing15224VVGassess the15225DTthe different15226JJdifferent policy15227NNpolicy considerations15228NNSconsideration ?15229SENT? [MR. LETTER]15230LOC[MR. LETTER] Our15231PP$our position15232NNposition is15233VBZbe that15234IN/thatthat ,15235,, one15236CDone ,15237,, the15238DTthe Justice15239NPJustice Department15240NPDepartment can15241MDcan get15242VVget this15243DTthis information15244NNinformation elsewhere15245RBelsewhere ,15246,, as15247INas we15248PPwe know15249VVPknow .15250SENT. But15251CCbut ,15252,, two15253CDtwo ,15254,, you15255PPyou can15256MDcan 't15257RB't undermine15258VVundermine the15259DTthe accuracy15260NNaccuracy of15261INof the15262DTthe actual15263JJactual enumeration15264NNenumeration in15265INin order15266NNorder to15267TOto get15268VVget information15269NNinformation ...15270:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15271LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] So15272RBso ...15273:... [MR. LETTER]15274LOC[MR. LETTER] ...15275:... for15276INfor the15277DTthe Voting15278NPVoting Rights15279NPSRights Act15280NPAct .15281SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15282LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...15283:... the15284DTthe constitutional15285JJconstitutional backdrop15286NNbackdrop ,15287,, I15288PPI think15289VVPthink ,15290,, if15291INif I15292PPI 'm15293VBPbe translating15294VVGtranslate your15295PP$your argument15296NNargument ,15297,, means15298VVZmean that15299IN/thatthat anything15300NNanything that15301WDTthat would15302MDwould undermine15303VVundermine the15304DTthe enumeration15305NNenumeration is15306VBZbe impermissible15307JJimpermissible and15308CCand unreasonable15309JJunreasonable ?15310SENT? [MR. LETTER]15311LOC[MR. LETTER] I15312PPI believe15313VVPbelieve so15314RBso ,15315,, Your15316PP$your Honor15317NPHonor .15318SENT. And15319CCand the15320DTthe only15321JJonly thing15322NNthing ...15323:... the15324DTthe only15325JJonly addition15326NNaddition I15327PPI would15328MDwould make15329VVmake to15330TOto that15331DTthat is15332VBZbe ,15333,, as15334INas I15335PPI said15336VVDsay to15337TOto Justice15338NPJustice Alito15339NPAlito ,15340,, undoubtedly15341RBundoubtedly ,15342,, there15343EXthere 's15344VBZbe a15345DTa de15346NPde minimis15347NPminimis determination15348NNdetermination .15349SENT. But15350CCbut ,15351,, again15352RBagain ,15353,, this15354DTthis Court15355NNcourt is15356VBZbe ...15357:... this15358DTthis Court15359NPCourt is15360VBZbe the15361DTthe expert15362NNexpert on15363INon the15364DTthe Constitution15365NPConstitution .15366SENT. Thank15367VVthank you15368PPyou ,15369,, Your15370PP$your Honor15371NPHonor .15372SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]15373LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank15374VVthank you15375PPyou ,15376,, counsel15377NNcounsel .15378SENT. Four15379CDFour minutes15380NNSminute ,15381,, General15382NPGeneral Francisco15383NPFrancisco .15384SENT.

[GENERAL FRANCISCO]15385LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Mr15386NPMr .15387SENT. Chief15388NPChief Justice15389NPJustice ,15390,, thank15391VVPthank you15392PPyou .15393SENT. I15394PPI 'd15395MDwould like15396VVlike to15397TOto make15398VVmake four15399CDfour points15400NNSpoint :15401:: First15402RBfirst ,15403,, on15404INon the15405DTthe disclosure15406NNdisclosure avoidance15407NNavoidance protocols15408NNSprotocol ,15409,, we15410PPwe discussed15411VVDdiscuss those15412DTthose at15413INat our15414PP$our reply15415NNreply brief15416NNbrief at15417INat page15418NNpage 1715419CD@card@ .15420SENT. The15421DTthe bottom15422JJbottom line15423NNline is15424VBZbe that15425IN/thatthat those15426DTthose protocols15427NNSprotocol apply15428VVPapply to15429TOto all15430DTall census15431NNcensus data15432NNSdatum ,15433,, including15434VVGinclude on15435INon sex15436NNsex ,15437,, on15438INon age15439NNage ,15440,, on15441INon race15442NNrace ,15443,, that15444IN/thatthat the15445DTthe Department15446NPDepartment of15447INof Justice15448NPJustice uses15449VVZuse to15450TOto construct15451VVconstruct citizen15452NNcitizen voting15453NNvoting age15454NNage population15455NNpopulation .15456SENT. It15457PPit 's15458VHZhave never15459RBnever been15460VBNbe a15461DTa problem15462NNproblem before15463RBbefore .15464SENT. There15465EXthere 's15466VBZbe no15467DTno reason15468NNreason to15469TOto think15470VVthink it15471PPit 'll15472MDwill be15473VBbe a15474DTa problem15475NNproblem now15476RBnow .15477SENT. And15478CCand I15479PPI ...15480:... in15481INin fact15482NNfact ,15483,, I15484PPI think15485VVPthink in15486INin the15487DTthe trial15488NNtrial record15489NNrecord ,15490,, Dr15491NPDr .15492SENT. Abowd15493NNSAbowd testified15494VVDtestify how15495WRBhow it15496PPit would15497MDwould not15498RBnot be15499VBbe a15500DTa problem15501NNproblem .15502SENT. Second15503RBsecond ,15504,, I15505PPI 'd15506MDwould like15507VVlike to15508TOto point15509VVpoint Your15510PP$your Honors15511NNShonors to15512TOto the15513DTthe key15514JJkey differences15515NNSdifference memo15516NNmemo at15517INat page15518NNpage 14815519CD@card@ of15520INof the15521DTthe Joint15522NPJoint Appendix15523NPAppendix ,15524,, the15525DTthe very15526RBvery ...15527:... the15528DTthe one15529CDone full15530JJfull paragraph15531NNparagraph ,15532,, the15533DTthe first15534JJfirst sentence15535NNsentence says15536VVZsay ,15537,, "15538``" The15539DTthe relative15540JJrelative quality15541NNquality of15542INof Alternative15543NPAlternative C15544NPC versus15545CCversus Alternative15546NPAlternative D15547NPD will15548MDwill depend15549VVdepend on15550INon the15551DTthe relative15552JJrelative importance15553NNimportance of15554INof the15555DTthe errors15556NNSerror in15557INin the15558DTthe administrative15559JJadministrative data15560NNSdatum ,15561,, response15562NNresponse data15563NNSdatum ,15564,, and15565CCand imputations15566NNSimputation .15567SENT. "15568``" It15569PPit then15570RBthen goes15571VVZgo through15572INthrough and15573CCand discusses15574VVZdiscuss the15575DTthe various15576JJvarious types15577NNStype of15578INof errors15579NNSerror .15580SENT. And15581CCand its15582PP$its final15583JJfinal conclusion15584NNconclusion is15585VBZbe ,15586,, "15587''" Unfortunately15588RBunfortunately ,15589,, the15590DTthe Census15591NPCensus Bureau15592NPBureau cannot15593MDcan quantify15594VVquantify the15595DTthe relative15596JJrelative magnitude15597NNmagnitude of15598INof the15599DTthe errors15600NNSerror across15601INacross the15602DTthe alternatives15603NNSalternative .15604SENT. "15605``" Third15606JJthird ,15607,, in15608INin terms15609NNSterm of15610INof response15611NNresponse rates15612NNSrate ,15613,, the15614DTthe administrative15615JJadministrative record15616NNrecord shows15617VVZshow that15618IN/thatthat the15619DTthe Census15620NPCensus Bureau15621NPBureau staff15622NNstaff believed15623VVDbelieve that15624IN/thatthat there15625EXthere would15626MDwould be15627VBbe a15628DTa 515629CD5 .15630SENT. 115631CD1 percent15632NNpercent decrease15633NNdecrease in15634INin the15635DTthe initial15636JJinitial response15637NNresponse rates15638NNSrate from15639INfrom adding15640VVGadd the15641DTthe citizenship15642NNcitizenship question15643NNquestion .15644SENT. But15645CCbut ,15646,, as15647INas Secretary15648NPSecretary Ross15649NPRoss points15650VVZpoint out15651RPout in15652INin his15653PP$his memorandum15654NNmemorandum ,15655,, that15656WDTthat does15657VVZdo n't15658RBn't take15659VVtake into15660INinto account15661NNaccount follow-up15662NNfollow-up operations15663NNSoperation .15664SENT. That15665DTthat 's15666VBZbe the15667DTthe response15668NNresponse rate15669NNrate drop15670NNdrop before15671INbefore follow-up15672NNfollow-up operations15673NNSoperation .15674SENT. And15675CCand it15676PPit does15677VVZdo n't15678RBn't disaggregate15679JJdisaggregate between15680INbetween those15681DTthose who15682WPwho are15683VBPbe going15684VVGgo to15685TOto be15686VBbe put15687VVNput off15688RPoff by15689INby the15690DTthe citizenship15691NNcitizenship question15692NNquestion itself15693PPitself ,15694,, as15695RBas opposed15696VVNoppose to15697TOto those15698DTthose who15699WPwho are15700VBPbe put15701VVNput off15702RPoff by15703INby the15704DTthe larger15705JJRlarge macro15706NNmacro environment15707NNenvironment because15708INbecause they15709PPthey do15710VVPdo n't15711RBn't trust15712VVtrust the15713DTthe government15714NNgovernment or15715CCor do15716VVPdo n't15717RBn't like15718VVlike this15719DTthis particular15720JJparticular administration15721NNadministration .15722SENT. And15723CCand that15724WDTthat ,15725,, I15726PPI think15727VVPthink ,15728,, is15729VBZbe one15730CDone of15731INof the15732DTthe reasons15733NNSreason why15734WRBwhy Dr15735NNDr .15736SENT. Abowd15737NNSAbowd concluded15738VVDconclude in15739INin the15740DTthe testimony15741NNtestimony that15742IN/thatthat Justice15743NPJustice Breyer15744NPBreyer cited15745VVDcite that15746IN/thatthat "15747``" there15748EXthere 's15749VBZbe no15750DTno credible15751JJcredible quantitative15752JJquantitative evidence15753NNevidence that15754IN/thatthat the15755DTthe addition15756NNaddition of15757INof a15758DTa citizenship15759NNcitizenship question15760NNquestion "15761''" ...15762:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15763LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I15764PPI ...15765:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]15766LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...15767:... "15768``" will15769MDwill affect15770VVaffect the15771DTthe accuracy15772NNaccuracy of15773INof the15774DTthe count15775NNcount .15776SENT. "15777''" And15778CCand ...15779:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15780LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...15781:... I15782PPI thought15783VVDthink that15784DTthat Dr15785NNDr .15786SENT. Abowd15787NNSAbowd stated15788VVDstate and15789CCand the15790DTthe district15791NNdistrict court15792NNcourt found15793VVDfind that15794IN/thatthat the15795DTthe follow-up15796NNfollow-up process15797NNprocess was15798VBDbe ,15799,, at15800INat best15801JJSgood ,15802,, riddled15803VVNriddle with15804INwith a15805DTa number15806NNnumber of15807INof ...15808:... of15809INof ...15810:... of15811INof inadequacies15812NNSinadequacy and15813CCand that15814IN/thatthat it15815PPit would15816MDwould n't15817RBn't be15818VBbe adequate15819JJadequate enough15820RBenough to15821TOto take15822VVtake care15823NNcare of15824INof the15825DTthe shortfall15826NNshortfall .15827SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]15828LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Well15829UHwell ,15830,, we15831PPwe can15832MDcan debate15833VVdebate about15834RBabout whether15835INwhether it15836PPit would15837MDwould be15838VBbe adequate15839JJadequate enough15840RBenough ,15841,, but15842CCbut in15843INin order15844NNorder to15845TOto say15846VVsay that15847IN/thatthat the15848DTthe final15849JJfinal self-response15850NNself-response rate15851NNrate would15852MDwould drop15853VVdrop by15854INby 515855CD5 .15856SENT. 115857CD1 percent15858NNpercent ,15859,, you15860PPyou have15861VHPhave to15862TOto conclude15863VVconclude that15864IN/thatthat it15865PPit 's15866VBZbe zero15867CDzero percent15868NNpercent accurate15869JJaccurate .15870SENT. And15871CCand I15872PPI do15873VVPdo n't15874RBn't think15875VVthink that15876IN/thatthat there15877EXthere 's15878VBZbe any15879DTany basis15880NNbasis in15881INin the15882DTthe record15883NNrecord to15884TOto conclude15885VVconclude that15886IN/thatthat it15887PPit 's15888VBZbe ...15889:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15890LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So15891RBso how15892WRBhow much15893JJmuch accuracy15894NNaccuracy ...15895:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]15896LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...15897:... zero15898CDzero percent15899NNpercent accurate15900JJaccurate .15901SENT. So15902RBso ...15903:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15904LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...15905:... would15906MDwould be15907VBbe ...15908:... let15909VVlet 's15910VBZbe assume15911VVassume it15912PPit were15913VBDbe 515914CD5 .15915SENT. 815916CD8 or15917CCor something15918NNsomething close15919NNclose to15920TOto it15921PPit .15922SENT. Is15923VBZbe that15924IN/thatthat de15925NPde minimis15926NPminimis to15927TOto you15928PPyou ?15929SENT? Is15930VBZbe that15931DTthat ...15932:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]15933LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Your15934PP$your Honor15935NPHonor ,15936,, I15937PPI think15938VVPthink ...15939:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15940LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...15941:... inconsequential15942JJinconsequential ?15943SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]15944LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...15945:... I15946PPI think15947VVPthink that15948IN/thatthat that15949DTthat is15950VBZbe largely15951RBlargely an15952DTan impossible15953JJimpossible question15954NNquestion to15955TOto answer15956VVanswer .15957SENT. That15958DTthat is15959VBZbe not15960RBnot built15961VVNbuild into15962INinto the15963DTthe Constitution15964NPConstitution itself15965PPitself .15966SENT. There15967EXthere 's15968VBZbe always15969RBalways going15970VVGgo to15971TOto be15972VBbe a15973DTa tradeoff15974NNtradeoff .15975SENT. The15976DTthe long-form15977NNlong-form census15978NNcensus ,15979,, for15980INfor example15981NNexample ,15982,, caused15983VVDcause a15984DTa drop15985NNdrop in15986INin self-response15987JJself-response rates15988NNSrate relative15989JJrelative to15990TOto ...15991:... to15992TOto the15993DTthe short15994JJshort form15995NNform by15996INby ,15997,, I15998PPI believe15999VVPbelieve ,16000,, around16001INaround percent16002NNpercent .16003SENT. But16004CCbut my16005PP$my final16006JJfinal point16007NNpoint is16008VBZbe one16009CDone that16010IN/thatthat Mr16011NPMr .16012SENT. Letter16013NNletter alluded16014VVNallude to16015TOto ,16016,, and16017CCand that16018DTthat is16019VBZbe under16020INunder ...16021:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16022LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That16023DTthat 's16024VBZbe why16025WRBwhy you16026PPyou keep16027VVPkeep ...16028:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16029LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...16030:... my16031PP$my friend's16032NNSfriend's ...16033:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16034LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...16035:... the16036DTthe short16037JJshort form16038NNform .16039SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16040LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Right16041NPRight ,16042,, Your16043PP$your Honor16044NPHonor .16045SENT. And16046CCand under16047INunder my16048PP$my friend16049NNfriend 's16050VBZbe on16051INon the16052DTthe other16053JJother side16054NNside 's16055POS's position16056NNposition ,16057,, you16058PPyou are16059VBPbe effectively16060RBeffectively empowering16061VVGempower any16062DTany group16063NNgroup in16064INin the16065DTthe country16066NNcountry to16067TOto knock16068VVknock off16069RPoff any16070DTany question16071NNquestion on16072INon the16073DTthe census16074NNcensus if16075INif they16076PPthey simply16077RBsimply get16078VVPget together16079RBtogether and16080CCand boycott16081VVboycott it16082PPit .16083SENT. There16084EXthere are16085VBPbe many16086JJmany people16087NNSpeople in16088INin this16089DTthis country16090NNcountry who16091WPwho might16092MDmight find16093VVfind the16094DTthe sex16095NNsex question16096NNquestion objectionable16097JJobjectionable because16098INbecause it16099PPit limits16100VVZlimit individuals16101NNSindividual to16102TOto a16103DTa binary16104JJbinary choice16105NNchoice .16106SENT. If16107INif a16108DTa large16109JJlarge number16110NNnumber of16111INof people16112NNSpeople got16113VVDget together16114RBtogether in16115INin one16116CDone state16117NNstate and16118CCand said16119VVDsay we16120PPwe 're16121VBPbe going16122VVGgo to16123TOto boycott16124VVboycott the16125DTthe census16126NNcensus ...16127:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16128LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] General16129NPGeneral ...16130:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16131LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...16132:... as16133RBas long16134RBlong as16135INas you16136PPyou include16137VVPinclude ...16138:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16139LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] General16140NPGeneral ...16141:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16142LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...16143:... that16144DTthat sex16145NNsex question16146NNquestion ,16147,, you16148PPyou 're16149VBPbe effectively16150RBeffectively empowering16151VVGempower ...16152:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16153LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] General16154NPGeneral ,16155,, are16156VBPbe you16157PPyou ...16158:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16159LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...16160:... them16161PPthem to16162TOto knock16163VVknock that16164IN/thatthat off16165RBoff ...16166:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16167LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...16168:... suggesting16169VVGsuggest ...16170:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16171LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Justice16172NPJustice Sotomayor16173NPSotomayor .16174SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16175LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Are16176VBPbe you16177PPyou suggesting16178VVGsuggest ...16179:... are16180VBPbe you16181PPyou suggesting16182VVGsuggest that16183IN/thatthat Hispanics16184NNSHispanic are16185VBPbe boycotting16186VVGboycott the16187DTthe census16188NNcensus ,16189,, that16190WDTthat they16191PPthey ...16192:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16193LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Not16194RBnot ...16195:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16196LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Are16197VBPbe you16198PPyou suggesting16199VVGsuggest they16200PPthey do16201VVPdo n't16202RBn't have16203VHhave ,16204,, whether16205INwhether it16206PPit 's16207VBZbe rational16208JJrational or16209CCor not16210RBnot ,16211,, that16212IN/thatthat they16213PPthey do16214VVPdo n't16215RBn't have16216VHhave a16217DTa legitimate16218JJlegitimate fear16219NNfear ?16220SENT? [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16221LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Not16222RBnot in16223INin the16224DTthe slightest16225JJSslight ,16226,, Your16227PP$your Honor16228NPHonor .16229SENT. I16230PPI am16231VBPbe suggesting16232VVGsuggest that16233IN/thatthat the16234DTthe risk16235NNrisk ...16236:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16237LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So16238RBso ...16239:... [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16240LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] ...16241:... of16242INof my16243PP$my friend16244NNfriend 's16245POS's theory16246NNtheory on16247INon the16248DTthe other16249JJother side16250NNside is16251VBZbe that16252IN/thatthat it16253PPit countenances16254VVZcountenance precisely16255RBprecisely that16256DTthat type16257NNtype of16258INof coordinated16259VVNcoordinate behavior16260NNbehavior that16261WDTthat would16262MDwould empower16263VVempower groups16264NNSgroup to16265TOto knock16266VVknock off16267RPoff any16268DTany question16269NNquestion of16270INof the16271DTthe census16272NNcensus that16273IN/thatthat they16274PPthey found16275VVDfind to16276TOto be16277VBbe particularly16278RBparticularly objectionable16279JJobjectionable .16280SENT. Mr16281NPMr .16282SENT. Chief16283NPChief Justice16284NPJustice ,16285,, unless16286INunless the16287DTthe Court16288NPCourt has16289VHZhave further16290JJRfurther questions16291NNSquestion ?16292SENT? [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16293LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We16294PPwe 're16295VBPbe all16296RBall done16297VVNdo .16298SENT. [GENERAL FRANCISCO]16299LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO] Thank16300VVthank you16301PPyou ,16302,, Your16303PP$your Honor16304NPHonor .16305SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16306LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank16307VVthank you16308PPyou ,16309,, General16310NPGeneral .16311SENT. The16312DTthe case16313NNcase is16314VBZbe submitted16315VVNsubmit .16316SENT.