[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We2PPwe
'll3MDwill
hear4VVhear
argument5NNargument
this6DTthis
morning7NNmorning
in8INin
Case9NPCase
18-96610CD@card@
,11,,
the12DTthe
Department13NPDepartment
of14INof
Commerce15NPCommerce
versus16CCversus
New17NPNew
York18NPYork
.19SENT.
General20NPGeneral
Francisco21NPFrancisco
.22SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]23LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Mr24NPMr
.25SENT.
Chief26NPChief
Justice27NPJustice
,28,,
and29CCand
may30MDmay
it31PPit
please32VVplease
the33DTthe
Court34NPCourt
:35::
In36INin
March37NPMarch
201838CD@card@
,39,,
Secretary40NPSecretary
Ross41NPRoss
reinstated42VVDreinstate
a43DTa
citizenship44NNcitizenship
question45NNquestion
that46WDTthat
has47VHZhave
been48VBNbe
asked49VVNask
as50INas
part51NNpart
of52INof
the53DTthe
census54NNcensus
in55INin
one56CDone
form57NNform
or58CCor
another59DTanother
for60INfor
nearly61RBnearly
20062CD@card@
years63NNSyear
.64SENT.
The65DTthe
district66NNdistrict
court67NNcourt
's68POS's
invalidation69NNinvalidation
...70:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]71LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I72PPI
'm73VBPbe
sorry74JJsorry
.75SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]76LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...77:...
of78INof
that79DTthat
decision80NNdecision
was81VBDbe
wrong82JJwrong
for83INfor
...84:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]85LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I86PPI
'm87VBPbe
sorry88JJsorry
,89,,
it90PPit
's91VHZhave
not92RBnot
been93VBNbe
a94DTa
part95NNpart
of96INof
the97DTthe
survey98NNsurvey
,99,,
which100WDTwhich
is101VBZbe
where102WRBwhere
he103PPhe
reinstated104VVDreinstate
it105PPit
,106,,
since107INsince
1950108CD@card@
.109SENT.
And110CCand
for111INfor
65112CD@card@
years113NNSyear
,114,,
every115DTevery
Secretary116NPSecretary
of117INof
the118DTthe
Department119NPDepartment
of120INof
Commerce121NPCommerce
,122,,
every123DTevery
statistician124NNstatistician
,125,,
including126VVGinclude
this127DTthis
Secretary128NPSecretary
's129POS's
statistician130NNstatistician
,131,,
recommended132VVNrecommend
against133INagainst
adding134VVGadd
the135DTthe
question136NNquestion
.137SENT.
So138RBso
it139PPit
may140MDmay
be141VBbe
that142DTthat
200143CD@card@
years144NNSyear
of145INof
asking146VVGask
a147DTa
citizenship148NNcitizenship
question149NNquestion
in150INin
other151JJother
forms152NNSform
may153MDmay
be154VBbe
true155JJtrue
,156,,
but157CCbut
not158RBnot
on159INon
the160DTthe
short161JJshort
survey162NNsurvey
.163SENT.
That164DTthat
's165VBZbe
what166WPwhat
's167VBZbe
at168INat
issue169NNissue
here170RBhere
.171SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]172LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Well173UHWell
,174,,
but175RBbut
,176,,
Your177PP$your
Honor178NPHonor
,179,,
it180PPit
has181VHZhave
been182VBNbe
part183NNpart
of184INof
the185DTthe
census186NNcensus
for187INfor
the188DTthe
better189JJRgood
part190NNpart
of191INof
200192CD@card@
years193NNSyear
,194,,
initially195RBinitially
as196INas
part197NNpart
of198INof
the199DTthe
overall200JJoverall
census201NNcensus
itself202PPitself
...203:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]204LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But205CCbut
do206VVPdo
n't207RBn't
we208PPwe
put209VVDput
...210:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]211LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...212:...
that213WDTthat
went214VVDgo
to215TOto
all216DTall
individuals217NNSindividual
.218SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]219LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...220:...
do221VVPdo
n't222RBn't
we223PPwe
ask224VVPask
the225DTthe
question226NNquestion
in227INin
context228NNcontext
?229SENT?
And230CCand
for231INfor
65-odd-plus232JJ65-odd-plus
years233NNSyear
,234,,
everybody235NNeverybody
said236VVDsay
do237VVdo
n't238RBn't
add239VVadd
it240PPit
?241SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]242LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
No243NPNo
,244,,
Your245PP$your
Honor246NPHonor
,247,,
because248RBbecause
,249,,
in250INin
fact251NNfact
,252,,
it253PPit
was254VBDbe
included255VVNinclude
in256INin
the257DTthe
long-form258NNlong-form
census259NNcensus
until260INuntil
the261DTthe
year262NNyear
2000263CD@card@
.264SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]265LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That266DTthat
is267VBZbe
a268DTa
different269JJdifferent
...270:...
that271WDTthat
's272VBZbe
the273DTthe
whole274JJwhole
issue275NNissue
.276SENT.
It277PPit
could278MDcould
have279VHhave
been280VBNbe
...281:...
it282PPit
's283VBZbe
still284RBstill
included285VVNinclude
...286:...
or287CCor
it288PPit
could289MDcould
have290VHhave
been291VBNbe
included292VVNinclude
in293INin
the294DTthe
ACS295NPACS
form296NNform
,297,,
which298WDTwhich
is299VBZbe
still300RBstill
being301VBGbe
done302VVNdo
.303SENT.
And304CCand
that305DTthat
's306VBZbe
being307VBGbe
done308VVNdo
every309DTevery
first310JJfirst
,311,,
third312JJthird
,313,,
and314CCand
fifth315JJfifth
year316NNyear
.317SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]318LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yes319NPYes
,320,,
Your321PP$your
Honor322NPHonor
,323,,
but324CCbut
it325PPit
has326VHZhave
been327VBNbe
part328NNpart
of329INof
the330DTthe
census331NNcensus
in332INin
one333CDone
form334NNform
or335CCor
another336DTanother
for337INfor
a338DTa
very339RBvery
long340JJlong
period341NNperiod
of342INof
time343NNtime
.344SENT.
It345PPit
has346VHZhave
a347DTa
long348JJlong
pedigree349NNpedigree
.350SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]351LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So352INso
the353DTthe
question354NNquestion
now355RBnow
before356INbefore
us357PPus
is358VBZbe
...359:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]360LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
The361DTthe
question362NNquestion
,363,,
therefore364RBtherefore
,365,,
is366VBZbe
two367CDtwo
things368NNSthing
.369SENT.
First370RBfirst
,371,,
we372PPwe
think373VVPthink
that374IN/thatthat
the375DTthe
Respondents376NNSrespondent
'377POS'
claims378NNSclaim
are379VBPbe
not380RBnot
justiciable381JJjusticiable
because382INbecause
their383PP$their
injuries384NNSinjury
are385VBPbe
n't386RBn't
fairly387RBfairly
attributable388JJattributable
to389TOto
the390DTthe
government391NNgovernment
or392CCor
subject393NNsubject
to394TOto
APA395NPAPA
review396NNreview
.397SENT.
And398CCand
,399,,
secondly400RBsecondly
,401,,
the402DTthe
Secretary403NPSecretary
acted404VVDact
well405RBwell
within406INwithin
his407PP$his
discretion408NNdiscretion
when409WRBwhen
he410PPhe
determined411VVDdetermine
that412IN/thatthat
reinstating413VVGreinstate
the414DTthe
citizenship415NNcitizenship
question416NNquestion
would417MDwould
provide418VVprovide
the419DTthe
best420JJSgood
evidence421NNevidence
of422INof
citizenship423NNcitizenship
.424SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]425LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Can426MDcan
we427PPwe
just428RBjust
go429VVPgo
back430RBback
a431DTa
bit432NNbit
to433TOto
your434PP$your
opening435NNopening
?436SENT?
Why437WRBwhy
was438VBDbe
the439DTthe
citizenship440NNcitizenship
question441NNquestion
dropped442VVDdrop
in443INin
1960444CD@card@
and445CCand
remained446VVDremain
off447RPoff
for448INfor
all449PDTall
the450DTthe
decades451NNSdecade
after452INafter
that453DTthat
?454SENT?
What455WPWhat
was456VBDbe
the457DTthe
reason458NNreason
for459INfor
dropping460VVGdrop
it461PPit
?462SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]463LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Your464PP$your
Honor465NPHonor
,466,,
in467INin
1960468CD@card@
,469,,
it470PPit
did471VVDdo
n't472RBn't
appear473VVappear
in474INin
anything475NNanything
,476,,
and477CCand
it478PPit
was479VBDbe
moved480VVNmove
on481INon
to482TOto
the483DTthe
American484NPAmerican
Community485NPCommunity
Survey486NPSurvey
.487SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]488LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But489CCbut
...490:...
but491CCbut
why492RBwhy
...493:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]494LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
That495DTthat
was496VBDbe
part497NNpart
of498INof
an499DTan
overall500JJoverall
movement501NNmovement
of502INof
most503JJSmost
of504INof
the505DTthe
demographic506JJdemographic
...507:...
I508PPI
'm509VBPbe
sorry510JJsorry
,511,,
onto512INonto
the513DTthe
long-form514NNlong-form
census515NNcensus
,516,,
not517RBnot
the518DTthe
American519NPAmerican
Community520NPCommunity
Survey521NPSurvey
.522SENT.
And523CCand
that524DTthat
was525VBDbe
part526NNpart
of527INof
a528DTa
larger529JJRlarge
process530NNprocess
that531WDTthat
moved532VVDmove
a533DTa
large534JJlarge
number535NNnumber
of536INof
demographic537JJdemographic
questions538NNSquestion
off539RBoff
of540INof
the541DTthe
short542JJshort
form543NNform
and544CCand
onto545INonto
the546DTthe
long547JJlong
form548NNform
.549SENT.
We550PPwe
no551RBno
longer552RBRlonger
have553VHhave
a554DTa
long555JJlong
form556NNform
,557,,
so558RBso
then559RBthen
the560DTthe
question561NNquestion
is562VBZbe
do563VVdo
you564PPyou
reinstate565VVreinstate
the566DTthe
long567JJlong
form568NNform
or569CCor
do570VVdo
you571PPyou
,572,,
in573INin
fact574NNfact
,575,,
move576VVmove
it577PPit
back578RBback
onto579INonto
the580DTthe
short-form581NNshort-form
census582NNcensus
.583SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]584LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But585CCbut
did586VVDdo
n't587RBn't
...588:...
did589VVDdo
n't590RBn't
...591:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]592LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
It593PPit
was594VBDbe
eminently595RBeminently
...596:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]597LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...598:...
did599VVDdo
n't600RBn't
the601DTthe
Census602NPCensus
Bureau603NPBureau
give604VVgive
a605DTa
reason606NNreason
why607WRBwhy
it608PPit
was609VBDbe
dropped610VVNdrop
?611SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]612LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Well613UHwell
,614,,
they615PPthey
generally616RBgenerally
wanted617VVDwant
to618TOto
move619VVmove
all620DTall
of621INof
the622DTthe
demographic623JJdemographic
questions624NNSquestion
onto625INonto
the626DTthe
long627JJlong
form628NNform
.629SENT.
We630PPwe
no631RBno
longer632RBRlonger
have633VHhave
a634DTa
long635JJlong
form636NNform
.637SENT.
And638CCand
the639DTthe
problems640NNSproblem
with641INwith
using642VVGuse
the643DTthe
American644NPAmerican
Community645NPCommunity
Survey646NPSurvey
are647VBPbe
well648RBwell
known649VVNknow
.650SENT.
So651RBso
you652PPyou
basically653RBbasically
...654:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]655LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But656CCbut
there657EXthere
was658VBDbe
nothing659NNnothing
...660:...
there661EXthere
was662VBDbe
nothing663NNnothing
in664INin
1960665CD@card@
to666TOto
the667DTthe
effect668NNeffect
that669IN/thatthat
the670DTthe
Census671NPCensus
Bureau672NPBureau
found673VVDfind
that674IN/thatthat
putting675VVGput
it676PPit
on677INon
the678DTthe
short679JJshort
form680NNform
would681MDwould
depress682VVdepress
the683DTthe
count684NNcount
of685INof
non-citizens686NNSnon-citizens
?687SENT?
Nothing688NNnothing
like689INlike
that690DTthat
?691SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]692LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Well693UHwell
...694:...
well695RBwell
,696,,
sure697RBsure
,698,,
Your699PP$your
Honor700NPHonor
,701,,
but702CCbut
that703DTthat
's704VBZbe
because705INbecause
they706PPthey
thought707VVDthink
that708IN/thatthat
,709,,
along710INalong
with711INwith
all712DTall
of713INof
the714DTthe
other715JJother
demographic716JJdemographic
questions717NNSquestion
in718INin
the719DTthe
census720NNcensus
,721,,
had722VHDhave
an723DTan
overall724JJoverall
impact725NNimpact
of726INof
...727:...
on728INon
...729:...
on730INon
...731:...
on732INon
overall733JJoverall
census734NNcensus
accuracy735NNaccuracy
.736SENT.
And737CCand
that738DTthat
underscores739VVZunderscore
why740WRBwhy
we741PPwe
do742VVPdo
n't743RBn't
think744VVthink
this745DTthis
is746VBZbe
really747RBreally
subject748JJsubject
to749TOto
judicial750JJjudicial
review751NNreview
,752,,
because753RBbecause
,754,,
really755RBreally
,756,,
what757WPwhat
you758PPyou
're759VBPbe
saying760VVGsay
is761VBZbe
that762IN/thatthat
Congress763NPCongress
...764:...
courts765NNScourt
would766MDwould
have767VHhave
to768TOto
review769VVreview
every770DTevery
question771NNquestion
on772INon
the773DTthe
long774JJlong
form775NNform
to776TOto
determine777VVdetermine
if778INif
the779DTthe
informational780JJinformational
value781NNvalue
of782INof
the783DTthe
question784NNquestion
outweighed785VVDoutweigh
the786DTthe
impact787NNimpact
on788INon
census789NNcensus
accuracy790NNaccuracy
,791,,
because792RBbecause
,793,,
at794INat
the795DTthe
end796NNend
of797INof
the798DTthe
day799NNday
,800,,
if801INif
you802PPyou
add803VVPadd
any804DTany
particular805JJparticular
question806NNquestion
onto807INonto
the808DTthe
census809NNcensus
,810,,
you811PPyou
're812VBPbe
always813RBalways
trading814VVGtrade
off815RPoff
information816NNinformation
and817CCand
accuracy818NNaccuracy
.819SENT.
And820CCand
141821CD@card@
(822((
a823DTa
)824))
does825VVZdo
n't826RBn't
provide827VVprovide
courts828NNScourt
with829INwith
a830DTa
basis831NNbasis
for832INfor
evaluating833VVGevaluate
that834DTthat
determination835NNdetermination
.836SENT.
So837RBso
that838DTthat
's839VBZbe
why840WRBwhy
we841PPwe
think842VVPthink
this843DTthis
is844VBZbe
n't845RBn't
subject846JJsubject
to847TOto
APA848NPAPA
review849NNreview
at850INat
all851DTall
.852SENT.
But853CCbut
we854PPwe
also855RBalso
think856VVPthink
that857IN/thatthat
the858DTthe
Respondents859NNSrespondent
do860VVPdo
n't861RBn't
have862VHhave
standing863NNstanding
here864RBhere
,865,,
because866INbecause
they867PPthey
're868VBPbe
injured869VVNinjure
if870INif
and871CCand
only872RBonly
if873INif
,874,,
first875RBfirst
,876,,
you877PPyou
have878VHPhave
third-party879JJthird-party
action880NNaction
;881:;
secondly882RBsecondly
,883,,
you884PPyou
have885VHPhave
third-party886JJthird-party
action887NNaction
that888WDTthat
's889VBZbe
illegal890JJillegal
;891:;
and892CCand
,893,,
third894JJthird
,895,,
that896DTthat
third-party897JJthird-party
action898NNaction
is899VBZbe
based900VVNbase
on901INon
speculation902NNspeculation
that903IN/thatthat
the904DTthe
government905NNgovernment
will906MDwill
itself907PPitself
violate908VVviolate
the909DTthe
law910NNlaw
.911SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]912LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
On913INon
the914DTthe
...915:...
on916INon
the917DTthe
illegality918NNillegality
,919,,
is920VBZbe
...921:...
is922VBZbe
that923IN/thatthat
a924DTa
...925:...
a926DTa
predictive927JJpredictive
factor928NNfactor
?929SENT?
In930INin
other931JJother
words932NNSword
,933,,
do934VVPdo
we935PPwe
,936,,
as937INas
our938PP$our
cases939NNScase
have940VHPhave
often941RBoften
said942VVNsay
,943,,
do944VVPdo
not945RBnot
assume946VVassume
illegal947JJillegal
behavior948NNbehavior
in949INin
establishing950VVGestablish
standing951NNstanding
,952,,
but953CCbut
is954VBZbe
that955IN/thatthat
simply956RBsimply
predictive957JJpredictive
?958SENT?
In959INin
other960JJother
words961NNSword
,962,,
we963PPwe
doubt964VVPdoubt
people965NNSpeople
are966VBPbe
going967VVGgo
to968TOto
engage969VVengage
on970INon
a971DTa
regular972JJregular
basis973NNbasis
in974INin
illegal975JJillegal
behavior976NNbehavior
,977,,
and978CCand
,979,,
therefore980RBtherefore
,981,,
we982PPwe
do983VVPdo
n't984RBn't
think985VVthink
their986PP$their
injury987NNinjury
is988VBZbe
...989:...
is990VBZbe
tangible991JJtangible
or992CCor
likely993JJlikely
,994,,
or995CCor
is996VBZbe
there997RBthere
something998NNsomething
special999JJspecial
about1000INabout
the1001DTthe
fact1002NNfact
that1003IN/thatthat
it1004PPit
's1005VBZbe
illegal1006JJillegal
activity1007NNactivity
?1008SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1009LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Well1010UHwell
,1011,,
I1012PPI
think1013VVPthink
,1014,,
Your1015PP$your
Honor1016NPHonor
,1017,,
in1018RBin
...1019:...
in1020INin
the1021DTthe
Court1022NPCourt
's1023POS's
past1024JJpast
cases1025NNScase
,1026,,
it1027PPit
has1028VHZhave
often1029RBoften
been1030VBNbe
used1031VVNuse
as1032INas
a1033DTa
predictive1034JJpredictive
factor1035NNfactor
,1036,,
but1037CCbut
I1038PPI
also1039RBalso
think1040VVPthink
that1041IN/thatthat
when1042WRBwhen
you1043PPyou
put1044VVPput
it1045PPit
all1046RBall
together1047RBtogether
,1048,,
it1049PPit
breaks1050VVZbreak
the1051DTthe
chain1052NNchain
of1053INof
causation1054NNcausation
for1055INfor
Article1056NPArticle
III1057NPIII
causation1058NNcausation
purposes1059NNSpurpose
.1060SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1061LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I1062PPI
mean1063VVPmean
,1064,,
it1065PPit
is1066VBZbe
true1067JJtrue
that1068IN/thatthat
if1069INif
people1070NNSpeople
go1071VVPgo
601072CD@card@
miles1073NNSmile
an1074DTan
hour1075NNhour
in1076INin
a1077DTa
55-mile-an-hour1078JJ55-mile-an-hour
zone1079NNzone
,1080,,
that1081WDTthat
's1082VBZbe
unlawful1083JJunlawful
.1084SENT.
But1085CCbut
you1086PPyou
would1087MDwould
n't1088RBn't
say1089VVsay
that1090IN/thatthat
they1091PPthey
're1092VBPbe
not1093RBnot
going1094VVGgo
to1095TOto
do1096VVdo
that1097IN/thatthat
in1098INin
forming1099VVGform
public1100JJpublic
policy1101NNpolicy
...1102:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1103LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
And1104CCand
...1105:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1106LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
...1107:...
or1108CCor
considering1109VVGconsider
standing1110NNstanding
.1111SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1112LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...1113:...
I1114PPI
...1115:...
I1116PPI
agree1117VVPagree
,1118,,
Your1119PP$your
Honor1120NPHonor
,1121,,
and1122CCand
that1123DTthat
's1124VBZbe
not1125RBnot
our1126PP$our
argument1127NNargument
here1128RBhere
.1129SENT.
I1130PPI
think1131VVPthink
that1132IN/thatthat
Clapper1133NPClapper
is1134VBZbe
a1135DTa
good1136JJgood
analogy1137NNanalogy
.1138SENT.
In1139INin
Clapper1140NPClapper
,1141,,
it1142PPit
was1143VBDbe
quite1144RBquite
clear1145JJclear
that1146IN/thatthat
the1147DTthe
plaintiffs1148NNSplaintiff
in1149INin
that1150DTthat
case1151NNcase
suffered1152VVDsuffer
an1153DTan
injury1154NNinjury
in1155INin
fact1156NNfact
,1157,,
because1158INbecause
they1159PPthey
declined1160VVDdecline
to1161TOto
use1162VVuse
their1163PP$their
cell1164NNcell
phones1165NNSphone
to1166TOto
communicate1167VVcommunicate
with1168INwith
their1169PP$their
clients1170NNSclient
and1171CCand
their1172PP$their
clients1173NNSclient
declined1174VVDdecline
to1175TOto
use1176VVuse
their1177PP$their
cell1178NNcell
phones1179NNSphone
to1180TOto
communicate1181VVcommunicate
with1182INwith
them1183PPthem
out1184INout
of1185INof
a1186DTa
fear1187NNfear
that1188IN/thatthat
their1189PP$their
phone1190NNphone
calls1191NNScall
would1192MDwould
be1193VBbe
intercepted1194VVNintercept
.1195SENT.
No1196DTno
question1197NNquestion
that1198IN/thatthat
there1199EXthere
was1200VBDbe
an1201DTan
injury1202NNinjury
in1203INin
fact1204NNfact
.1205SENT.
But1206CCbut
what1207WPwhat
the1208DTthe
Court1209NPCourt
held1210VVDhold
was1211VBDbe
that1212IN/thatthat
that1213DTthat
injury1214NNinjury
was1215VBDbe
n't1216RBn't
fairly1217RBfairly
attributable1218JJattributable
to1219TOto
the1220DTthe
government1221NNgovernment
because1222INbecause
it1223PPit
was1224VBDbe
caused1225VVNcause
by1226INby
the1227DTthe
plaintiffs1228NNSplaintiff
'1229POS'
fear1230NNfear
...1231:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1232LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I1233PPI
...1234:...
I1235PPI
...1236:...
I1237PPI
'm1238VBPbe
sorry1239JJsorry
,1240,,
you1241PPyou
're1242VBPbe
talking1243VVGtalk
...1244:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1245LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...1246:...
that1247IN/thatthat
the1248DTthe
government1249NNgovernment
would1250MDwould
intercept1251VVintercept
their1252PP$their
calls1253NNScall
.1254SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1255LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
You1256PPyou
're1257VBPbe
talking1258VVGtalk
proximate1259JJproximate
cause1260NNcause
,1261,,
which1262WDTwhich
we1263PPwe
've1264VHPhave
never1265RBnever
used1266VVNuse
.1267SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1268LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
No1269NPNo
,1270,,
Your1271PP$your
Honor1272NPHonor
.1273SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1274LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
We1275PPwe
've1276VHPhave
used1277VVNuse
determinate1278JJdeterminate
or1279CCor
coercive1280JJcoercive
effect1281NNeffect
.1282SENT.
In1283INin
Wayfair1284NPWayfair
,1285,,
one1286CDone
of1287INof
the1288DTthe
reasons1289NNSreason
we1290PPwe
found1291VVDfind
the1292DTthe
stores1293NNSstore
,1294,,
not1295RBnot
the1296DTthe
states1297NNSstate
,1298,,
to1299TOto
be1300VBbe
injured1301VVNinjure
is1302VBZbe
because1303INbecause
consumers1304NNSconsumer
fail1305VVPfail
to1306TOto
pay1307VVpay
taxes1308NNStaxis
,1309,,
an1310DTan
illegality1311NNillegality
under1312INunder
the1313DTthe
law1314NNlaw
.1315SENT.
And1316CCand
we1317PPwe
said1318VVDsay
that1319WDTthat
's1320VBZbe
why1321WRBwhy
the1322DTthe
states1323NNSstate
were1324VBDbe
being1325VBGbe
harmed1326VVNharm
.1327SENT.
In1328INin
NAACP1329NPNAACP
versus1330CCversus
Alabama1331NPAlabama
,1332,,
we1333PPwe
held1334VVDhold
the1335DTthe
NAACP1336NPNAACP
had1337VHDhave
standing1338NNstanding
,1339,,
even1340RBeven
though1341INthough
it1342PPit
was1343VBDbe
their1344PP$their
members1345NNSmember
who1346WPwho
would1347MDwould
be1348VBbe
injured1349VVNinjure
by1350INby
other1351JJother
people1352NNSpeople
,1353,,
an1354DTan
illegality1355NNillegality
,1356,,
harassment1357NNharassment
,1358,,
but1359CCbut
as1360INas
the1361DTthe
just1362RBjust
...1363:...
as1364INas
Chief1365NPChief
Justice1366NPJustice
Roberts1367NPRoberts
said1368VVDsay
,1369,,
it1370PPit
's1371VBZbe
predictable1372JJpredictable
.1373SENT.
There1374EXthere
's1375VBZbe
no1376DTno
doubt1377NNdoubt
that1378IN/thatthat
people1379NNSpeople
will1380MDwill
respond1381VVrespond
less1382RBRless
...1383:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1384LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Uh-huh1385NPUh-huh
.1386SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1387LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...1388:...
because1389INbecause
of1390INof
the1391DTthe
census1392NNcensus
.1393SENT.
That1394DTthat
has1395VHZhave
been1396VBNbe
proven1397VVNprove
in1398INin
study1399NNstudy
after1400INafter
study1401NNstudy
.1402SENT.
One1403CDOne
census1404NNcensus
surveyor1405NNsurveyor
described1406VVDdescribe
an1407DTan
incident1408NNincident
where1409WRBwhere
he1410PPhe
walked1411VVDwalk
into1412INinto
a1413DTa
home1414NNhome
,1415,,
started1416VVDstart
asking1417VVGask
citizenship1418NNcitizenship
,1419,,
and1420CCand
the1421DTthe
person1422NNperson
stopped1423VVDstop
and1424CCand
left1425VVDleave
his1426PP$his
home1427NNhome
,1428,,
leaving1429VVGleave
the1430DTthe
census1431NNcensus
surveyor1432NNsurveyor
sitting1433VVGsit
there1434RBthere
.1435SENT.
So1436RBso
,1437,,
if1438INif
you1439PPyou
're1440VBPbe
talking1441VVGtalk
about1442INabout
prediction1443NNprediction
,1444,,
this1445DTthis
is1446VBZbe
about1447RBabout
1001448CD@card@
percent1449NNpercent
that1450IN/thatthat
people1451NNSpeople
will1452MDwill
answer1453VVanswer
less1454RBRless
,1455,,
so1456RBso
...1457:...
but1458CCbut
I1459PPI
do1460VVPdo
n't1461RBn't
know1462VVknow
that1463IN/thatthat
it1464PPit
's1465VBZbe
prediction1466NNprediction
.1467SENT.
It1468PPit
's1469VBZbe
an1470DTan
action1471NNaction
by1472INby
the1473DTthe
government1474NNgovernment
will1475MDwill
be1476VBbe
a1477DTa
...1478:...
will1479MDwill
be1480VBbe
a1481DTa
cause1482NNcause
of1483INof
this1484DTthis
,1485,,
not1486RBnot
proximate1487JJproximate
necessarily1488RBnecessarily
,1489,,
but1490CCbut
that1491IN/thatthat
cause1492NNcause
will1493MDwill
cause1494VVcause
harm1495NNharm
.1496SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1497LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right1498NPRight
,1499,,
two1500CDtwo
responses1501NNSresponse
,1502,,
Your1503PP$your
Honor1504NPHonor
.1505SENT.
First1506RBfirst
,1507,,
we1508PPwe
're1509VBPbe
not1510RBnot
talking1511VVGtalk
about1512INabout
proximate1513JJproximate
cause1514NNcause
.1515SENT.
We1516PPwe
're1517VBPbe
talking1518VVGtalk
about1519INabout
an1520DTan
analysis1521NNanalysis
that1522WDTthat
was1523VBDbe
similar1524JJsimilar
to1525TOto
what1526WPwhat
this1527DTthis
Court1528NNcourt
used1529VVNuse
in1530INin
the1531DTthe
Clapper1532NPClapper
case1533NNcase
,1534,,
where1535WRBwhere
the1536DTthe
Clappers1537NNSclapper
said1538VVDsay
that1539IN/thatthat
even1540RBeven
though1541INthough
there1542EXthere
was1543VBDbe
injury1544NNinjury
in1545INin
fact1546NNfact
,1547,,
even1548RBeven
though1549INthough
the1550DTthe
government1551NNgovernment
's1552POS's
actions1553NNSaction
were1554VBDbe
in1555INin
a1556DTa
very1557RBvery
real1558JJreal
sense1559NNsense
a1560DTa
but-for1561NNbut-for
cause1562NNcause
of1563INof
that1564DTthat
injury1565NNinjury
in1566INin
fact1567NNfact
,1568,,
it1569PPit
was1570VBDbe
n't1571RBn't
fair1572JJfair
to1573TOto
attribute1574VVattribute
that1575IN/thatthat
to1576TOto
the1577DTthe
government1578NNgovernment
because1579INbecause
it1580PPit
was1581VBDbe
based1582VVNbase
on1583INon
the1584DTthe
plaintiffs1585NNSplaintiff
'1586POS'
speculation1587NNspeculation
that1588IN/thatthat
the1589DTthe
government1590NNgovernment
would1591MDwould
intercept1592VVintercept
their1593PP$their
telephone1594NNtelephone
calls1595NNScall
.1596SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1597LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But1598CCbut
this1599DTthis
is1600VBZbe
not1601RBnot
...1602:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1603LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
You1604PPyou
...1605:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1606LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...1607:...
the1608DTthe
plaintiff1609NNplaintiff
acting1610VVGact
;1611:;
this1612DTthis
is1613VBZbe
third1614JJthird
parties1615NNSparty
acting1616VVGact
.1617SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1618LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yes1619NPYes
,1620,,
and1621CCand
that1622WDTthat
makes1623VVZmake
it1624PPit
,1625,,
we1626PPwe
think1627VVPthink
,1628,,
even1629RBeven
worse1630JJRbad
because1631INbecause
the1632DTthe
Court1633NPCourt
's1634POS's
cases1635NNScase
have1636VHPhave
generally1637RBgenerally
said1638VVNsay
you1639PPyou
do1640VVPdo
n't1641RBn't
rely1642VVrely
on1643INon
third-party1644JJthird-party
standing1645NNstanding
.1646SENT.
But1647CCbut
...1648:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1649LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
You1650PPyou
...1651:...
you1652PPyou
said1653VVDsay
you1654PPyou
had1655VHDhave
two1656CDtwo
responses1657NNSresponse
?1658SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1659LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yeah1660NPYeah
.1661SENT.
The1662DTthe
second1663NNsecond
is1664VBZbe
that1665IN/thatthat
on1666INon
NAACP1667NPNAACP
against1668INagainst
Alabama1669NPAlabama
,1670,,
that1671WDTthat
was1672VBDbe
a1673DTa
case1674NNcase
where1675WRBwhere
the1676DTthe
NAACP1677NPNAACP
was1678VBDbe
being1679VBGbe
directly1680RBdirectly
regulated1681VVNregulate
by1682INby
the1683DTthe
statute1684NNstatute
that1685IN/thatthat
they1686PPthey
were1687VBDbe
challenging1688VVGchallenge
.1689SENT.
They1690PPthey
were1691VBDbe
forced1692VVNforce
to1693TOto
disclose1694VVdisclose
their1695PP$their
private1696JJprivate
membership1697NNmembership
lists1698NNSlist
,1699,,
and1700CCand
that1701DTthat
was1702VBDbe
their1703PP$their
injury1704NNinjury
.1705SENT.
There1706EXthere
was1707VBDbe
nobody1708NNnobody
that1709WDTthat
stood1710VVDstand
in1711INin
between1712INbetween
them1713PPthem
and1714CCand
the1715DTthe
disclosure1716NNdisclosure
of1717INof
their1718PP$their
private1719JJprivate
injury1720NNinjury
...1721:...
private1722JJprivate
membership1723NNmembership
list1724NNlist
.1725SENT.
But1726CCbut
turning1727VVGturn
to1728TOto
the1729DTthe
agency1730NNagency
reviewability1731NNreviewability
argument1732NNargument
,1733,,
there1734EXthere
really1735RBreally
is1736VBZbe
nothing1737NNnothing
in1738INin
1411739CD@card@
(1740((
a1741DTa
)1742))
that1743WDTthat
provides1744VVZprovide
courts1745NNScourt
with1746INwith
a1747DTa
basis1748NNbasis
to1749TOto
review1750VVreview
this1751DTthis
decision1752NNdecision
.1753SENT.
The1754DTthe
language1755NNlanguage
is1756VBZbe
quite1757RBquite
similar1758JJsimilar
to1759TOto
what1760WPwhat
the1761DTthe
Court1762NNcourt
addressed1763VVNaddress
in1764INin
Webster1765NPWebster
.1766SENT.
Every1767DTevery
...1768:...
the1769DTthe
addition1770NNaddition
of1771INof
any1772DTany
particular1773JJparticular
demographic1774JJdemographic
question1775NNquestion
is1776VBZbe
always1777RBalways
going1778VVGgo
to1779TOto
be1780VBbe
a1781DTa
tradeoff1782NNtradeoff
between1783INbetween
information1784NNinformation
and1785CCand
accuracy1786NNaccuracy
.1787SENT.
And1788CCand
I'd1789NNSI'd
...1790:...
I'd1791NNSI'd
...1792:...
I1793PPI
'd1794MDwould
urge1795VVurge
you1796PPyou
to1797TOto
look1798VVlook
to1799TOto
the1800DTthe
20001801CD@card@
long-form1802NNlong-form
census1803NNcensus
that1804WDTthat
had1805VHDhave
highly1806RBhighly
detailed1807VVNdetail
questions1808NNSquestion
about1809RBabout
not1810RBnot
just1811RBjust
citizenship1812NNcitizenship
but1813CCbut
things1814NNSthing
like1815INlike
your1816PP$your
commuting1817VVGcommute
time1818NNtime
,1819,,
how1820WRBhow
many1821JJmany
bedrooms1822NNSbedroom
you1823PPyou
had1824VHDhave
in1825INin
your1826PP$your
house1827NNhouse
,1828,,
whether1829INwhether
you1830PPyou
suffered1831VVDsuffer
from1832INfrom
certain1833JJcertain
health1834NNhealth
conditions1835NNScondition
.1836SENT.
Under1837INunder
Respondents1838NNSrespondent
'1839POS'
position1840NNposition
,1841,,
courts1842NNScourt
would1843MDwould
have1844VHhave
to1845TOto
review1846VVreview
each1847DTeach
one1848CDone
of1849INof
those1850DTthose
questions1851NNSquestion
to1852TOto
determine1853VVdetermine
whether1854INwhether
the1855DTthe
informational1856JJinformational
value1857NNvalue
of1858INof
that1859DTthat
question1860NNquestion
outweighed1861VVDoutweigh
any1862DTany
potential1863JJpotential
impact1864NNimpact
...1865:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]1866LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
On1867INon
the1868DTthe
main1869JJmain
form1870NNform
...1871:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1872LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...1873:...
on1874INon
census1875NNcensus
accuracy1876NNaccuracy
.1877SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]1878LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...1879:...
on1880INon
the1881DTthe
main1882JJmain
form1883NNform
...1884:...
on1885INon
the1886DTthe
main1887JJmain
form1888NNform
,1889,,
suppose1890VVPsuppose
the1891DTthe
Secretary1892NPSecretary
puts1893VVZput
in1894INin
a1895DTa
question1896NNquestion
about1897INabout
sexual1898JJsexual
orientation1899NNorientation
.1900SENT.
Suppose1901VVsuppose
he1902PPhe
puts1903VVZput
a1904DTa
question1905NNquestion
in1906INin
about1907INabout
arrest1908NNarrest
record1909NNrecord
.1910SENT.
Suppose1911VVsuppose
he1912PPhe
says1913VVZsay
,1914,,
I1915PPI
'm1916VBPbe
going1917VVGgo
to1918TOto
have1919VHhave
the1920DTthe
whole1921JJwhole
survey1922NNsurvey
in1923INin
French1924NPFrench
.1925SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1926LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Uh-huh1927NPUh-huh
.1928SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]1929LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
In1930INin
other1931JJother
words1932NNSword
,1933,,
we1934PPwe
have1935VHPhave
no1936DTno
role1937NNrole
to1938TOto
play1939VVplay
no1940DTno
matter1941NNmatter
how1942WRBhow
extreme1943JJextreme
?1944SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1945LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Your1946PP$your
Honor1947NPHonor
,1948,,
you1949PPyou
certainly1950RBcertainly
do1951VVPdo
have1952VHhave
a1953DTa
role1954NNrole
to1955TOto
play1956VVplay
,1957,,
and1958CCand
I1959PPI
think1960VVPthink
...1961:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]1962LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
All1963DTall
right1964NNright
.1965SENT.
Well1966UHwell
,1967,,
then1968RBthen
that1969DTthat
's1970VBZbe
the1971DTthe
question1972NNquestion
.1973SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1974LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...1975:...
and1976CCand
I1977PPI
think1978VVPthink
your1979PP$your
examples1980NNSexample
...1981:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]1982LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
That1983DTthat
's1984VBZbe
the1985DTthe
question1986NNquestion
.1987SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]1988LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yeah1989NPYeah
.1990SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]1991LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
That1992DTthat
's1993VBZbe
the1994DTthe
question1995NNquestion
.1996SENT.
And1997CCand
in1998INin
this1999DTthis
case2000NNcase
,2001,,
there2002EXthere
's2003VBZbe
a2004DTa
statute2005NNstatute
,2006,,
and2007CCand
the2008DTthe
statute2009NNstatute
says2010VVZsay
that2011IN/thatthat
the2012DTthe
Secretary2013NPSecretary
...2014:...
at2015INat
least2016JJSleast
on2017INon
this2018DTthis
form2019NNform
,2020,,
the2021DTthe
main2022JJmain
form2023NNform
,2024,,
he2025PPhe
shall2026MDshall
use2027VVuse
administrative2028JJadministrative
records2029NNSrecord
,2030,,
unless2031INunless
...2032:...
it2033PPit
says2034VVZsay
to2035TOto
the2036DTthe
maximum2037JJmaximum
extent2038NNextent
possible2039JJpossible
.2040SENT.
Do2041VVPdo
n't2042RBn't
ask2043VVask
direct2044JJdirect
questions2045NNSquestion
.2046SENT.
Use2047VVuse
administrative2048JJadministrative
records2049NNSrecord
,2050,,
because2051INbecause
they2052PPthey
want2053VVPwant
to2054TOto
keep2055VVkeep
it2056PPit
short2057JJshort
.2058SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2059LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right2060NPRight
.2061SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2062LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
To2063TOTo
the2064DTthe
maximum2065JJmaximum
extent2066NNextent
possible2067JJpossible
.2068SENT.
So2069RBso
I2070PPI
have2071VHPhave
two2072CDtwo
rather2073RBrather
technical2074JJtechnical
questions2075NNSquestion
in2076INin
what2077WPwhat
I2078PPI
think2079VVPthink
is2080VBZbe
the2081DTthe
heart2082NNheart
of2083INof
this2084DTthis
case2085NNcase
.2086SENT.
It2087PPit
's2088VBZbe
a2089DTa
technical2090JJtechnical
case2091NNcase
.2092SENT.
All2093DTall
right2094NNright
.2095SENT.
The2096DTthe
first2097JJfirst
question2098NNquestion
is2099VBZbe
the2100DTthe
Secretary2101NPSecretary
,2102,,
I2103PPI
gather2104VVPgather
from2105INfrom
the2106DTthe
record2107NNrecord
...2108:...
and2109CCand
we2110PPwe
've2111VHPhave
looked2112VVNlook
at2113INat
it2114PPit
,2115,,
my2116PP$my
office2117NNoffice
,2118,,
pretty2119RBpretty
carefully2120RBcarefully
...2121:...
is2122VBZbe
told2123VVNtell
by2124INby
the2125DTthe
Census2126NPCensus
Bureau2127NPBureau
in2128INin
three2129CDthree
studies2130NNSstudy
that2131IN/thatthat
if2132INif
you2133PPyou
ask2134VVPask
this2135DTthis
question2136NNquestion
on2137INon
the2138DTthe
regular2139JJregular
form2140NNform
,2141,,
you2142PPyou
will2143MDwill
get2144VVget
back2145RBback
fewer2146JJRfew
answers2147NNSanswer
.2148SENT.
And2149CCand
they2150PPthey
extrapolated2151VVDextrapolate
to2152TOto
do2153VVdo
that2154IN/thatthat
from2155INfrom
the2156DTthe
other2157JJother
surveys2158NNSsurvey
and2159CCand
so2160RBso
forth2161RBforth
,2162,,
and2163CCand
those2164DTthose
extrapolations2165NNSextrapolation
,2166,,
you2167PPyou
know2168VVPknow
,2169,,
holding2170VVGhold
for2171INfor
everything2172NNeverything
constant2173JJconstant
,2174,,
showed2175VVDshow
that2176IN/thatthat
the2177DTthe
non-citizens2178NNSnon-citizens
often2179RBoften
did2180VVDdo
n't2181RBn't
say2182VVsay
they2183PPthey
were2184VBDbe
non-citizens2185JJnon-citizens
.2186SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2187LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Uh-huh2188NPUh-huh
.2189SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2190LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And2191CCand
some2192DTsome
did2193VVDdo
n't2194RBn't
return2195VVreturn
it2196PPit
at2197INat
all2198DTall
.2199SENT.
Now2200RBnow
I2201PPI
have2202VHPhave
n't2203RBn't
seen2204VVNsee
any2205DTany
evidence2206NNevidence
to2207TOto
the2208DTthe
contrary2209NNcontrary
.2210SENT.
So2211RBso
I2212PPI
'm2213VBPbe
asking2214VVGask
you2215PPyou
where2216WRBwhere
the2217DTthe
evidence2218NNevidence
is2219VBZbe
on2220INon
that2221DTthat
.2222SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2223LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure2224NPSure
.2225SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2226LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And2227CCand
as2228RBas
to2229TOto
the2230DTthe
second2231JJsecond
,2232,,
same2233JJsame
question2234NNquestion
,2235,,
the2236DTthe
second2237NNsecond
is2238VBZbe
that2239IN/thatthat
several2240JJseveral
surveys2241NNSsurvey
,2242,,
including2243VVGinclude
Dr2244NPDr
.2245SENT.
Abowd2246NNAbowd
,2247,,
told2248VVDtell
the2249DTthe
Secretary2250NPSecretary
:2251::
Mr2252NPMr
.2253SENT.
Secretary2254NPSecretary
,2255,,
if2256INif
you2257PPyou
add2258VVPadd
the2259DTthe
question2260NNquestion
to2261TOto
the2262DTthe
census2263NNcensus
,2264,,
the2265DTthe
short2266JJshort
form2267NNform
,2268,,
the2269DTthe
direct2270JJdirect
form2271NNform
,2272,,
you2273PPyou
will2274MDwill
discover2275VVdiscover
that2276IN/thatthat
even2277RBeven
the2278DTthe
information2279NNinformation
you2280PPyou
want2281VVPwant
about2282INabout
citizenship2283NNcitizenship
is2284VBZbe
worse2285JJRbad
than2286INthan
if2287INif
you2288PPyou
just2289RBjust
look2290VVPlook
at2291INat
the2292DTthe
administrative2293JJadministrative
record2294NNrecord
.2295SENT.
Now2296RBnow
how2297WRBhow
can2298MDcan
that2299RBthat
be2300VBbe
?2301SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2302LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure2303NPSure
.2304SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2305LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Well2306UHWell
,2307,,
A2308NPA
,2309,,
they2310PPthey
say2311VVPsay
132312CD@card@
million2313CDmillion
people2314NNSpeople
,2315,,
it2316PPit
'll2317MDwill
be2318VBbe
a2319DTa
wash2320NNwash
because2321INbecause
you2322PPyou
won2323MDwill
't2324RB't
get2325VVget
information2326NNinformation
either2327CCeither
way2328NNway
.2329SENT.
They2330PPthey
won2331MDwill
't2332RB't
return2333VVreturn
it2334PPit
and2335CCand
you2336PPyou
do2337VVPdo
n't2338RBn't
have2339VHhave
it2340PPit
over2341RPover
on2342INon
the2343DTthe
administrative2344JJadministrative
part2345NNpart
.2346SENT.
But2347CCbut
,2348,,
as2349INas
to2350TOto
222351CD@card@
million2352CDmillion
,2353,,
which2354WDTwhich
you2355PPyou
highlight2356VVPhighlight
in2357INin
your2358PP$your
brief2359NNbrief
...2360:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2361LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yeah2362NPYeah
.2363SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2364LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...2365:...
what2366WPwhat
about2367INabout
them2368PPthem
?2369SENT?
And2370CCand
as2371INas
to2372TOto
them2373PPthem
,2374,,
what2375WPwhat
Dr2376NNDr
.2377SENT.
Abowd2378NNAbowd
says2379VVZsay
he2380PPhe
says2381VVZsay
,2382,,
and2383CCand
I2384PPI
saw2385VVDsee
it2386PPit
in2387INin
the2388DTthe
record2389NNrecord
,2390,,
he2391PPhe
says2392VVZsay
,2393,,
as2394RBas
to2395TOto
those2396DTthose
222397CD@card@
million2398CDmillion
,2399,,
I2400PPI
'll2401MDwill
tell2402VVtell
you2403PPyou
what2404WPwhat
,2405,,
you2406PPyou
just2407RBjust
look2408VVPlook
to2409TOto
the2410DTthe
census2411NNcensus
returns2412NNSreturn
and2413CCand
you2414PPyou
're2415VBPbe
going2416VVGgo
to2417TOto
find2418VVfind
it2419PPit
not2420RBnot
that2421IN/thatthat
accurate2422JJaccurate
because2423INbecause
some2424DTsome
are2425VBPbe
not2426RBnot
going2427VVGgo
to2428TOto
tell2429VVtell
the2430DTthe
truth2431NNtruth
.2432SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2433LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right2434NPRight
.2435SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2436LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
So2437RBso
go2438VVPgo
look2439NNlook
at2440INat
the2441DTthe
administrative2442JJadministrative
returns2443NNSreturn
,2444,,
and2445CCand
they2446PPthey
won2447MDwill
't2448RB't
be2449VBbe
there2450RBthere
,2451,,
but2452CCbut
we2453PPwe
'll2454MDwill
model2455VVmodel
them2456PPthem
.2457SENT.
Now2458RBnow
the2459DTthe
question2460NNquestion
is2461VBZbe
,2462,,
which2463WDTwhich
is2464VBZbe
more2465RBRmore
accurate2466JJaccurate
as2467RBas
to2468TOto
citizenship2469NNcitizenship
?2470SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2471LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure2472NPSure
.2473SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2474LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
The2475DTthe
models2476NNSmodel
over2477INover
here2478RBhere
on2479INon
the2480DTthe
administrative2481JJadministrative
part2482NNpart
or2483CCor
the2484DTthe
answer2485NNanswer
to2486TOto
the2487DTthe
questions2488NNSquestion
on2489INon
the2490DTthe
census2491NNcensus
part2492NNpart
?2493SENT?
And2494CCand
here2495RBhere
is2496VBZbe
what2497WPwhat
Dr2498NNDr
.2499SENT.
Abowd2500NNAbowd
says2501VVZsay
:2502::
222503CD@card@
million2504CDmillion
,2505,,
he2506PPhe
's2507VBZbe
asked2508VVNask
,2509,,
if2510INif
you2511PPyou
follow2512VVPfollow
your2513PP$your
practice2514NNpractice
,2515,,
you2516PPyou
'd2517MDwould
use2518VVuse
a2519DTa
survey2520NNsurvey
response2521NNresponse
,2522,,
not2523RBnot
model2524VVmodel
it2525PPit
;2526:;
is2527VBZbe
that2528DTthat
right2529NNright
?2530SENT?
That2531DTthat
's2532VBZbe
right2533JJright
.2534SENT.
And2535CCand
in2536INin
your2537PP$your
opinion2538NNopinion
,2539,,
that2540WDTthat
would2541MDwould
be2542VBbe
less2543RBRless
accurate2544JJaccurate
than2545INthan
if2546INif
you2547PPyou
just2548RBjust
went2549VVDgo
with2550INwith
modeling2551VVGmodel
over2552RPover
on2553INon
the2554DTthe
administrative2555JJadministrative
part2556NNpart
?2557SENT?
That2558DTthat
's2559VBZbe
correct2560JJcorrect
.2561SENT.
And2562CCand
the2563DTthe
conclusion2564NNconclusion
of2565INof
the2566DTthe
Census2567NPCensus
Bureau2568NPBureau
remains2569VVZremain
that2570IN/thatthat
adding2571VVGadd
the2572DTthe
question2573NNquestion
over2574INover
here2575RBhere
,2576,,
even2577RBeven
if2578INif
you2579PPyou
use2580VVPuse
the2581DTthe
administrative2582JJadministrative
part2583NNpart
too2584RBtoo
,2585,,
produces2586VVZproduce
worse2587JJRbad
citizen2588NNcitizen
...2589:...
worse2590JJRbad
data2591NNSdatum
on2592INon
citizenship2593NNcitizenship
than2594INthan
just2595RBjust
using2596VVGuse
the2597DTthe
administrative2598JJadministrative
data2599NNSdatum
alone2600RBalone
?2601SENT?
That2602DTthat
's2603VBZbe
the2604DTthe
question2605NNquestion
.2606SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2607LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yep2608NPYep
.2609SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2610LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Answer2611NNanswer
from2612INfrom
the2613DTthe
expert2614NNexpert
:2615::
"2616``"
That2617DTthat
's2618VBZbe
correct2619JJcorrect
.2620SENT.
"2621``"
So2622RBso
I2623PPI
read2624VVPread
that2625IN/thatthat
,2626,,
and2627CCand
,2628,,
you2629PPyou
know2630VVPknow
,2631,,
the2632DTthe
judges2633NNSjudge
below2634RBbelow
have2635VHPhave
listed2636VVNlist
142637CD@card@
other2638JJother
examples2639NNSexample
or2640CCor
other2641JJother
examples2642NNSexample
,2643,,
many2644JJmany
other2645JJother
examples2646NNSexample
,2647,,
and2648CCand
...2649:...
and2650CCand
...2651:...
but2652CCbut
that2653DTthat
's2654VBZbe
the2655DTthe
most2656RBSmost
direct2657JJdirect
.2658SENT.
So2659RBso
where2660WRBwhere
in2661INin
the2662DTthe
decision2663NNdecision
memo2664NNmemo
did2665VVDdo
the2666DTthe
Secretary2667NPSecretary
address2668VVaddress
that2669DTthat
problem2670NNproblem
?2671SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2672LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
So2673RBso
,2674,,
sure2675RBsure
,2676,,
Your2677PP$your
Honor2678NPHonor
.2679SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2680LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Both2681CCboth
problems2682NNSproblem
.2683SENT.
There2684EXthere
are2685VBPbe
two2686CDtwo
problems2687NNSproblem
.2688SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2689LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yes2690UHyes
,2691,,
yes2692UHyes
.2693SENT.
And2694CCand
I2695PPI
'd2696MDwould
like2697VVlike
to2698TOto
address2699VVaddress
that2700DTthat
evidentiary2701JJevidentiary
issue2702NNissue
first2703RBfirst
and2704CCand
then2705RBthen
I2706PPI
would2707MDwould
like2708VVlike
to2709TOto
come2710VVcome
back2711RBback
to2712TOto
your2713PP$your
question2714NNquestion
about2715INabout
Section2716NPSection
62717CD6
(2718((
c2719LSc
)2720))
of2721INof
the2722DTthe
statute2723NNstatute
as2724INas
well2725RBwell
.2726SENT.
If2727INif
you2728PPyou
look2729VVPlook
at2730INat
the2731DTthe
Joint2732NPJoint
Appendix2733NPAppendix
page2734NNpage
1482735CD@card@
,2736,,
the2737DTthe
...2738:...
the2739DTthe
Census2740NPCensus
Bureau2741NPBureau
staff2742NNstaff
specifically2743RBspecifically
told2744VVDtell
the2745DTthe
Secretary2746NPSecretary
...2747:...
and2748CCand
here2749RBhere
I2750PPI
'm2751VBPbe
quoting2752VVGquote
from2753INfrom
it2754PPit
...2755:...
that2756IN/thatthat
it2757PPit
"2758``"
cannot2759MDcan
quantify2760VVquantify
the2761DTthe
relative2762JJrelative
magnitude2763NNmagnitude
of2764INof
the2765DTthe
errors2766NNSerror
across2767INacross
alternatives2768NNSalternative
"2769''"
...2770:...
and2771CCand
he2772PPhe
's2773VBZbe
talking2774VVGtalk
about2775INabout
Alternatives2776NNSalternative
C2777NPC
and2778CCand
D2779NPD
...2780:...
"2781``"
at2782INat
this2783DTthis
time2784NNtime
.2785SENT.
"2786''"
So2787RBso
what2788WPwhat
he2789PPhe
was2790VBDbe
saying2791VVGsay
was2792VBDbe
that2793IN/thatthat
I2794PPI
do2795VVPdo
n't2796RBn't
know2797VVknow
if2798INif
the2799DTthe
response2800NNresponse
error2801NNerror
from2802INfrom
asking2803VVGask
the2804DTthe
question2805NNquestion
is2806VBZbe
going2807VVGgo
to2808TOto
be2809VBbe
more2810JJRmore
or2811CCor
less2812JJRless
than2813INthan
the2814DTthe
prediction2815NNprediction
error2816NNerror
if2817INif
I2818PPI
use2819VVPuse
...2820:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]2821LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No2822RBno
,2823,,
he2824PPhe
said2825VVDsay
just2826RBjust
what2827WPwhat
you2828PPyou
said2829VVDsay
.2830SENT.
He2831PPhe
said2832VVDsay
,2833,,
I2834PPI
cannot2835MDcan
quantify2836VVquantify
it2837PPit
.2838SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2839LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure2840NPSure
.2841SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2842LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And2843CCand
that2844WDTthat
means2845VVZmean
he2846PPhe
can2847MDcan
't2848RB't
put2849VVDput
scientific2850JJscientific
numbers2851NNSnumber
.2852SENT.
Of2853INof
course2854NNcourse
,2855,,
they2856PPthey
said2857VVDsay
that2858IN/thatthat
they2859PPthey
wanted2860VVDwant
two2861CDtwo
years2862NNSyear
to2863TOto
test2864VVtest
it2865PPit
,2866,,
but2867CCbut
they2868PPthey
can2869MDcan
't2870RB't
quantify2871VVquantify
it2872PPit
.2873SENT.
But2874CCbut
we2875PPwe
do2876VVPdo
have2877VHhave
three2878CDthree
studies2879NNSstudy
,2880,,
and2881CCand
those2882DTthose
studies2883NNSstudy
look2884VVPlook
at2885INat
what2886WPwhat
happened2887VVDhappen
when2888WRBwhen
you2889PPyou
asked2890VVDask
this2891DTthis
question2892NNquestion
before2893RBbefore
,2894,,
and2895CCand
what2896WPwhat
happened2897VVDhappen
when2898WRBwhen
you2899PPyou
asked2900VVDask
this2901DTthis
question2902NNquestion
before2903RBbefore
...2904:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2905LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right2906RBright
.2907SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2908LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...2909:...
is2910VBZbe
the2911DTthe
response2912NNresponse
rate2913NNrate
fell2914VVDfall
.2915SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2916LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
And2917CCand
so2918RBso
,2919,,
if2920INif
I2921PPI
could2922MDcould
complete2923VVcomplete
my2924PP$my
answer2925NNanswer
,2926,,
what2927WPwhat
the2928DTthe
Bureau2929NPBureau
staff2930NNstaff
told2931VVDtell
him2932PPhim
was2933VBDbe
that2934IN/thatthat
they2935PPthey
did2936VVDdo
n't2937RBn't
know2938VVknow
which2939WDTwhich
one2940CDone
would2941MDwould
be2942VBbe
better2943JJRgood
or2944CCor
worse2945JJRbad
.2946SENT.
So2947RBso
what2948WPwhat
the2949DTthe
Secretary2950NPSecretary
...2951:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2952LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I2953PPI
'm2954VBPbe
sorry2955JJsorry
.2956SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]2957LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Where2958WRBwhere
does2959VVZdo
it2960PPit
say2961VVPsay
that2962RBthat
?2963SENT?
Where2964WRBwhere
does2965VVZdo
it2966PPit
say2967VVPsay
that2968RBthat
?2969SENT?
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2970LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Maybe2971RBmaybe
you2972PPyou
could2973MDcould
,2974,,
if2975INif
you2976PPyou
do2977VVPdo
n't2978RBn't
mind2979VVmind
,2980,,
maybe2981RBmaybe
you2982PPyou
could2983MDcould
complete2984VVcomplete
your2985PP$your
answer2986NNanswer
.2987SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]2988LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure2989NPSure
.2990SENT.
That2991DTthat
is2992VBZbe
specifically2993RBspecifically
,2994,,
Your2995PP$your
Honor2996NPHonor
,2997,,
at2998INat
page2999NNpage
1483000CD@card@
of3001INof
the3002DTthe
Joint3003NPJoint
Appendix3004NPAppendix
,3005,,
where3006WRBwhere
it3007PPit
specifically3008RBspecifically
says3009VVZsay
and3010CCand
explains3011VVZexplain
that3012IN/thatthat
it3013PPit
cannot3014MDcan
quantify3015VVquantify
the3016DTthe
relative3017JJrelative
magnitude3018NNmagnitude
of3019INof
the3020DTthe
errors3021NNSerror
across3022INacross
the3023DTthe
alternatives3024NNSalternative
,3025,,
Alternatives3026NNSalternative
C3027NPC
and3028CCand
D3029NPD
,3030,,
at3031INat
this3032DTthis
time3033NNtime
because3034INbecause
it3035PPit
did3036VVDdo
n't3037RBn't
know3038VVknow
if3039INif
the3040DTthe
response3041NNresponse
errors3042NNSerror
from3043INfrom
asking3044VVGask
the3045DTthe
question3046NNquestion
would3047MDwould
be3048VBbe
more3049JJRmore
or3050CCor
less3051JJRless
than3052INthan
the3053DTthe
prediction3054NNprediction
errors3055NNSerror
from3056INfrom
the3057DTthe
model3058NNmodel
.3059SENT.
So3060RBso
what3061WPwhat
the3062DTthe
Secretary3063NPSecretary
knew3064VVDknow
was3065VBDbe
two3066CDtwo
basic3067JJbasic
things3068NNSthing
...3069:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3070LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I3071PPI
'm3072VBPbe
sorry3073JJsorry
.3074SENT.
They3075PPthey
...3076:...
they3077PPthey
have3078VHPhave
prediction3079NNprediction
models3080NNSmodel
.3081SENT.
They3082PPthey
say3083VVPsay
multiple3084JJmultiple
times3085NNStime
,3086,,
at3087INat
least3088JJSleast
three3089CDthree
,3090,,
if3091INif
not3092RBnot
more3093JJRmore
,3094,,
that3095DTthat
Alternative3096NPAlternative
D3097NPD
,3098,,
which3099WDTwhich
was3100VBDbe
the3101DTthe
Secretary3102NPSecretary
's3103POS's
alternative3104NNalternative
,3105,,
and3106CCand
their3107PP$their
Alternative3108NPAlternative
C3109NPC
,3110,,
so3111RBso
everybody3112NNeverybody
's3113VBZbe
clear3114JJclear
,3115,,
C3116NPC
was3117VBDbe
simply3118RBsimply
to3119TOto
use3120VVuse
administrative3121JJadministrative
records3122NNSrecord
,3123,,
D3124NPD
was3125VBDbe
the3126DTthe
Secretary3127NPSecretary
's3128POS's
idea3129NNidea
of3130INof
adding3131VVGadd
the3132DTthe
question3133NNquestion
to3134TOto
the3135DTthe
survey3136NNsurvey
plus3137CCplus
administrative3138JJadministrative
records3139NNSrecord
.3140SENT.
And3141CCand
on3142INon
the3143DTthe
prediction3144NNprediction
models3145NNSmodel
,3146,,
which3147WDTwhich
is3148VBZbe
what3149WPwhat
scientists3150NNSscientist
can3151MDcan
do3152VVdo
,3153,,
each3154DTeach
and3155CCand
every3156DTevery
time3157NNtime
they3158PPthey
said3159VVDsay
D3160NPD
would3161MDwould
be3162VBbe
less3163RBRless
accurate3164JJaccurate
than3165INthan
C3166NPC
.3167SENT.
Now3168RBnow
you3169PPyou
're3170VBPbe
asking3171VVGask
...3172:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3173LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Except3174INexcept
for3175INfor
the3176DTthe
one3177CDone
time3178NNtime
where3179WRBwhere
it3180PPit
mattered3181VVDmatter
,3182,,
Your3183PP$your
Honor3184NPHonor
,3185,,
in3186INin
the3187DTthe
key3188JJkey
differences3189NNSdifference
...3190:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3191LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But3192CCbut
comparative3193JJcomparative
...3194:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3195LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...3196:...
memo3197NNmemo
,3198,,
where3199WRBwhere
they3200PPthey
specifically3201RBspecifically
said3202VVDsay
that3203IN/thatthat
they3204PPthey
did3205VVDdo
not3206RBnot
know3207VVknow
if3208INif
C3209NPC
was3210VBDbe
better3211JJRgood
than3212INthan
D3213NPD
.3214SENT.
And3215CCand
so3216INso
what3217WPwhat
the3218DTthe
Secretary3219NPSecretary
knew3220VVDknow
...3221:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3222LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
No3223UHNo
,3224,,
no3225UHno
,3226,,
no3227UHno
,3228,,
no3229UHno
,3230,,
that3231WDTthat
's3232VBZbe
not3233RBnot
what3234WPwhat
he3235PPhe
said3236VVDsay
.3237SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3238LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
That3239DTthat
is3240VBZbe
exactly3241RBexactly
what3242WPwhat
he3243PPhe
said3244VVDsay
.3245SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3246LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
He3247PPhe
said3248VVDsay
you3249PPyou
can3250MDcan
't3251RB't
...3252:...
you3253PPyou
're3254VBPbe
...3255:...
the3256DTthe
words3257NNSword
"3258``"
comparative3259JJcomparative
errors3260NNSerror
"3261``"
have3262VHPhave
a3263DTa
different3264JJdifferent
meaning3265NNmeaning
than3266INthan
you3267PPyou
're3268VBPbe
giving3269VVGgive
it3270PPit
.3271SENT.
Comparative3272JJcomparative
errors3273NNSerror
are3274VBPbe
I3275PPI
'm3276VBPbe
comparing3277VVGcompare
this3278DTthis
type3279NNtype
of3280INof
error3281NNerror
to3282TOto
that3283DTthat
type3284NNtype
of3285INof
error3286NNerror
and3287CCand
what3288WPwhat
they3289PPthey
compare3290VVPcompare
each3291DTeach
other3292JJother
to3293TOto
.3294SENT.
You3295PPyou
can3296MDcan
't3297RB't
do3298VVPdo
that3299IN/thatthat
to3300TOto
a3301DTa
scientific3302JJscientific
certainty3303NNcertainty
.3304SENT.
But3305CCbut
you3306PPyou
can3307MDcan
have3308VHhave
predictive3309JJpredictive
models3310NNSmodel
,3311,,
which3312WDTwhich
is3313VBZbe
what3314WPwhat
they3315PPthey
did3316VVDdo
,3317,,
and3318CCand
they3319PPthey
...3320:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3321LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right3322RBright
.3323SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3324LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...3325:...
showed3326VVDshow
you3327PPyou
,3328,,
time3329NNtime
and3330CCand
again3331RBagain
they3332PPthey
told3333VVDtell
you3334PPyou
,3335,,
you3336PPyou
add3337VVPadd
the3338DTthe
survey3339NNsurvey
question3340NNquestion
,3341,,
it3342PPit
's3343VBZbe
going3344VVGgo
to3345TOto
be3346VBbe
less3347RBRless
accurate3348JJaccurate
than3349INthan
just3350RBjust
relying3351VVGrely
on3352INon
administrative3353JJadministrative
records3354NNSrecord
.3355SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3356LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Your3357PP$your
Honor3358NPHonor
,3359,,
I3360PPI
...3361:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3362LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So3363RBso
how3364WRBhow
do3365VVPdo
you3366PPyou
...3367:...
how3368WRBhow
do3369VVPdo
you3370PPyou
take3371VVtake
or3372CCor
pluck3373VVpluck
out3374RPout
of3375INof
what3376WPwhat
they3377PPthey
say3378VVPsay
in3379INin
one3380CDone
sentence3381NNsentence
,3382,,
if3383INif
you3384PPyou
're3385VBPbe
the3386DTthe
Secretary3387NPSecretary
,3388,,
and3389CCand
rely3390VVrely
on3391INon
that3392DTthat
one3393CDone
sentence3394NNsentence
and3395CCand
ignore3396VVignore
the3397DTthe
wealth3398NNwealth
of3399INof
statistics3400NNSstatistic
,3401,,
graphs3402NNSgraph
,3403,,
testimony3404NNtestimony
,3405,,
proof3406NNproof
,3407,,
control3408NNcontrol
studies3409NNSstudy
of3410INof
how3411WRBhow
...3412:...
how3413WRBhow
these3414DTthese
response3415NNresponse
rates3416NNSrate
came3417VVDcome
about3418RBabout
and3419CCand
decide3420VVPdecide
that3421IN/thatthat
that3422DTthat
one3423CDone
sentence3424NNsentence
is3425VBZbe
enough3426JJenough
to3427TOto
justify3428VVjustify
ignoring3429VVGignore
everything3430NNeverything
else3431RBelse
?3432SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3433LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Because3434INbecause
,3435,,
Your3436PP$your
Honor3437NPHonor
,3438,,
I3439PPI
respectfully3440RBrespectfully
disagree3441VVPdisagree
with3442INwith
your3443PP$your
reading3444NNreading
of3445INof
the3446DTthe
administrative3447JJadministrative
record3448NNrecord
.3449SENT.
If3450INif
you3451PPyou
read3452VVPread
through3453INthrough
the3454DTthe
key3455JJkey
differences3456NNSdifference
memo3457NNmemo
,3458,,
what3459WPwhat
the3460DTthe
Bureau3461NPBureau
staff3462NNstaff
is3463VBZbe
telling3464VVGtell
to3465TOto
the3466DTthe
Secretary3467NPSecretary
...3468:...
and3469CCand
,3470,,
look3471VVPlook
,3472,,
there3473EXthere
's3474VBZbe
no3475DTno
question3476NNquestion
that3477IN/thatthat
the3478DTthe
Bureau3479NPBureau
staff3480NNstaff
preferred3481VVDprefer
not3482RBnot
to3483TOto
have3484VHhave
this3485DTthis
question3486NNquestion
on3487INon
the3488DTthe
census3489NNcensus
...3490:...
but3491CCbut
what3492WPwhat
they3493PPthey
were3494VBDbe
telling3495VVGtell
the3496DTthe
Secretary3497NPSecretary
was3498VBDbe
that3499IN/thatthat
they3500PPthey
could3501MDcould
n't3502RBn't
tell3503VVtell
which3504WDTwhich
model3505NNmodel
would3506MDwould
be3507VBbe
more3508JJRmore
or3509CCor
less3510RBRless
accurate3511JJaccurate
.3512SENT.
But3513CCbut
they3514PPthey
did3515VVDdo
give3516VVgive
him3517PPhim
specific3518JJspecific
information3519NNinformation
.3520SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3521LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But3522CCbut
,3523,,
General3524NPGeneral
...3525:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3526LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
They3527PPthey
told3528VVDtell
him3529PPhim
that3530RBthat
...3531:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3532LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Please3533VVplease
finish3534NNfinish
.3535SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3536LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
They3537PPthey
told3538VVDtell
him3539PPhim
that3540IN/thatthat
if3541INif
he3542PPhe
actually3543RBactually
asked3544VVDask
the3545DTthe
question3546NNquestion
for3547INfor
303548CD@card@
...3549:...
for3550INfor
223551CD@card@
.3552SENT.
23553CD2
million3554CDmillion
people3555NNSpeople
for3556INfor
whom3557WPwhom
no3558DTno
administrative3559JJadministrative
records3560NNSrecord
existed3561VVDexist
,3562,,
he3563PPhe
would3564MDwould
have3565VHhave
got3566VVNget
actual3567JJactual
answers3568NNSanswer
at3569INat
983570CD@card@
percent3571NNpercent
accuracy3572NNaccuracy
.3573SENT.
And3574CCand
that3575IN/thatthat
the3576DTthe
alternative3577NNalternative
,3578,,
their3579PP$their
preferred3580JJpreferred
alternative3581NNalternative
,3582,,
was3583VBDbe
to3584TOto
use3585VVuse
a3586DTa
statistical3587JJstatistical
model3588NNmodel
to3589TOto
estimate3590VVestimate
citizenship3591NNcitizenship
,3592,,
not3593RBnot
just3594RBjust
for3595INfor
the3596DTthe
223597CD@card@
.3598SENT.
23599CD2
million3600CDmillion
but3601CCbut
for3602INfor
353603CD@card@
million3604CDmillion
,3605,,
but3606CCbut
they3607PPthey
had3608VHDhave
not3609RBnot
yet3610RByet
constructed3611VVNconstruct
that3612IN/thatthat
model3613NNmodel
and3614CCand
did3615VVDdo
n't3616RBn't
know3617VVknow
what3618WPwhat
the3619DTthe
error3620NNerror
rate3621NNrate
in3622INin
that3623DTthat
model3624NNmodel
would3625MDwould
be3626VBbe
.3627SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3628LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But3629CCbut
I3630PPI
...3631:...
I3632PPI
...3633:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3634LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
And3635CCand
so3636RBso
the3637DTthe
...3638:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3639LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...3640:...
I3641PPI
think3642VVPthink
,3643,,
General3644NPGeneral
,3645,,
I3646PPI
mean3647VVPmean
,3648,,
983649CD@card@
percent3650NNpercent
sounds3651VVZsound
awfully3652RBawfully
high3653JJhigh
,3654,,
but3655CCbut
it3656PPit
's3657VBZbe
kind3658NNkind
of3659INof
irrelevant3660JJirrelevant
too3661RBtoo
.3662SENT.
The3663DTthe
question3664NNquestion
is3665VBZbe
whether3666INwhether
,3667,,
if3668INif
you3669PPyou
used3670VVDuse
the3671DTthe
model3672NNmodel
,3673,,
it3674PPit
would3675MDwould
be3676VBbe
greater3677JJRgreat
than3678INthan
983679CD@card@
percent3680NNpercent
.3681SENT.
It3682PPit
would3683MDwould
be3684VBbe
993685CD@card@
.3686SENT.
53687CD5
percent3688NNpercent
.3689SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3690LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right3691NPRight
.3692SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3693LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Because3694INbecause
then3695RBthen
the3696DTthe
Secretary3697NPSecretary
would3698MDwould
have3699VHhave
no3700DTno
basis3701NNbasis
for3702INfor
saying3703VVGsay
that3704IN/thatthat
you3705PPyou
should3706MDshould
use3707VVuse
the3708DTthe
question3709NNquestion
rather3710RBrather
than3711INthan
the3712DTthe
model3713NNmodel
.3714SENT.
And3715CCand
as3716RBas
to3717TOto
that3718WDTthat
,3719,,
as3720INas
I3721PPI
think3722VVPthink
my3723PP$my
colleagues3724NNScolleague
are3725VBPbe
suggesting3726VVGsuggest
,3727,,
there3728EXthere
is3729VBZbe
a3730DTa
bottom-line3731JJbottom-line
conclusion3732NNconclusion
from3733INfrom
the3734DTthe
Census3735NPCensus
Bureau3736NPBureau
,3737,,
and3738CCand
the3739DTthe
bottom-line3740JJbottom-line
conclusion3741NNconclusion
is3742VBZbe
that3743IN/thatthat
Alternative3744NPAlternative
D3745NPD
,3746,,
which3747WDTwhich
is3748VBZbe
the3749DTthe
proposal3750NNproposal
that3751IN/thatthat
the3752DTthe
Secretary3753NPSecretary
eventually3754RBeventually
took3755VVDtake
,3756,,
would3757MDwould
still3758RBstill
have3759VHhave
all3760PDTall
the3761DTthe
negative3762JJnegative
cost3763NNcost
and3764CCand
quality3765NNquality
implications3766NNSimplication
of3767INof
Alternative3768NPAlternative
B3769NPB
,3770,,
which3771WDTwhich
was3772VBDbe
simply3773RBsimply
adding3774VVGadd
the3775DTthe
question3776NNquestion
alone3777RBalone
,3778,,
and3779CCand
would3780MDwould
result3781VVresult
in3782INin
poorer3783JJRpoor
quality3784NNquality
citizenship3785NNcitizenship
data3786NNSdatum
than3787INthan
Alternative3788NPAlternative
C3789NPC
,3790,,
which3791WDTwhich
is3792VBZbe
just3793RBjust
using3794VVGuse
the3795DTthe
administrative3796JJadministrative
records3797NNSrecord
plus3798CCplus
the3799DTthe
modeling3800NNmodeling
.3801SENT.
So3802RBso
there3803EXthere
is3804VBZbe
a3805DTa
bottom-line3806JJbottom-line
conclusion3807NNconclusion
from3808INfrom
the3809DTthe
Census3810NPCensus
Bureau3811NPBureau
.3812SENT.
And3813CCand
it3814PPit
seems3815VVZseem
as3816RBas
though3817INthough
what3818WPwhat
the3819DTthe
Secretary3820NPSecretary
needs3821VVZneed
is3822VBZbe
some3823DTsome
...3824:...
I3825PPI
mean3826VVPmean
,3827,,
a3828DTa
Secretary3829NPSecretary
can3830MDcan
deviate3831VVdeviate
...3832:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3833LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Uh-huh3834NPUh-huh
.3835SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3836LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...3837:...
from3838INfrom
his3839PP$his
experts3840NNSexpert
'3841POS'
recommendations3842NNSrecommendation
and3843CCand
from3844INfrom
his3845PP$his
experts3846NNSexpert
'3847POS'
bottom-line3848JJbottom-line
conclusions3849NNSconclusion
.3850SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3851LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right3852NPRight
.3853SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3854LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But3855CCbut
the3856DTthe
Secretary3857NPSecretary
needs3858VVZneed
reasons3859NNSreason
to3860TOto
do3861VVdo
that3862IN/thatthat
,3863,,
and3864CCand
I3865PPI
searched3866VVDsearch
the3867DTthe
record3868NNrecord
and3869CCand
I3870PPI
do3871VVPdo
n't3872RBn't
see3873VVsee
any3874DTany
reason3875NNreason
.3876SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]3877LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure3878NPSure
.3879SENT.
And3880CCand
,3881,,
Your3882PP$your
Honor3883NPHonor
,3884,,
so3885RBso
I3886PPI
want3887VVPwant
to3888TOto
just3889RBjust
finish3890VVfinish
what3891WPwhat
I3892PPI
was3893VBDbe
saying3894VVGsay
instantly3895RBinstantly
before3896RBbefore
because3897INbecause
I3898PPI
think3899VVPthink
it3900PPit
...3901:...
it3902PPit
responds3903VVZrespond
to3904TOto
your3905PP$your
question3906NNquestion
,3907,,
and3908CCand
then3909RBthen
I3910PPI
'd3911MDwould
like3912VVlike
to3913TOto
expand3914VVexpand
directly3915RBdirectly
in3916INin
response3917NNresponse
to3918TOto
your3919PP$your
question3920NNquestion
.3921SENT.
What3922WPWhat
the3923DTthe
Secretary3924NPSecretary
concluded3925VVDconclude
was3926VBDbe
,3927,,
in3928INin
the3929DTthe
face3930NNface
of3931INof
uncertainty3932NNuncertainty
,3933,,
he3934PPhe
'd3935MDwould
rather3936RBrather
go3937VVgo
with3938INwith
the3939DTthe
bird3940NNbird
in3941INin
a3942DTa
hand3943NNhand
and3944CCand
ask3945VVask
the3946DTthe
question3947NNquestion
at3948INat
percent3949NNpercent
accuracy3950NNaccuracy
than3951INthan
an3952DTan
unknown3953JJunknown
and3954CCand
untested3955JJuntested
statistical3956JJstatistical
model3957NNmodel
.3958SENT.
And3959CCand
that3960DTthat
's3961VBZbe
,3962,,
after3963INafter
all3964DTall
,3965,,
the3966DTthe
same3967JJsame
preference3968NNpreference
that3969IN/thatthat
the3970DTthe
Enumeration3971NNenumeration
Clause3972NNclause
itself3973PPitself
makes3974VVZmake
,3975,,
a3976DTa
prefer3977VVPprefer
...3978:...
preference3979NNpreference
for3980INfor
actual3981JJactual
counting3982NNcounting
over3983INover
estimation3984NNestimation
,3985,,
because3986INbecause
actual3987JJactual
counting3988NNcounting
is3989VBZbe
less3990RBRless
efficient3991JJefficient
.3992SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3993LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But3994CCbut
not3995RBnot
census3996NNcensus
...3997:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3998LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well3999UHWell
,4000,,
if4001INif
I4002PPI
can4003MDcan
just4004RBjust
add4005VVadd
to4006TOto
the4007DTthe
question4008NNquestion
,4009,,
and4010CCand
...4011:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4012LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
But4013CCbut
to4014TOto
go4015VVgo
...4016:...
to4017TOto
go4018VVgo
to4019TOto
your4020PP$your
question4021NNquestion
...4022:...
yes4023UHyes
.4024SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4025LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...4026:...
and4027CCand
let4028VVlet
me4029PPme
just4030RBjust
add4031VVPadd
to4032TOto
it4033PPit
a4034DTa
bit4035NNbit
because4036INbecause
you4037PPyou
said4038VVDsay
,4039,,
you4040PPyou
know4041VVPknow
,4042,,
an4043DTan
unknown4044JJunknown
and4045CCand
untested4046JJuntested
statistical4047JJstatistical
model4048NNmodel
,4049,,
but4050CCbut
here4051RBhere
are4052VBPbe
his4053PP$his
experts4054NNSexpert
in4055INin
the4056DTthe
Census4057NPCensus
Bureau4058NPBureau
saying4059VVGsay
we4060PPwe
are4061VBPbe
confident4062JJconfident
that4063IN/thatthat
we4064PPwe
can4065MDcan
produce4066VVproduce
a4067DTa
statistical4068JJstatistical
model4069NNmodel
that4070WDTthat
will4071MDwill
produce4072VVproduce
more4073RBRmore
accurate4074JJaccurate
bottom-line4075JJbottom-line
results4076NNSresult
,4077,,
and4078CCand
...4079:...
and4080CCand
,4081,,
again4082RBagain
,4083,,
this4084DTthis
bottom-line4085JJbottom-line
conclusion4086NNconclusion
is4087VBZbe
the4088DTthe
same4089JJsame
.4090SENT.
They4091PPthey
know4092VVPknow
what4093WPwhat
kind4094NNkind
of4095INof
statistical4096JJstatistical
models4097NNSmodel
they4098PPthey
can4099MDcan
build4100VVbuild
.4101SENT.
And4102CCand
this4103DTthis
is4104VBZbe
the4105DTthe
bottom-line4106JJbottom-line
conclusion4107NNconclusion
.4108SENT.
And4109CCand
where4110WRBwhere
is4111VBZbe
the4112DTthe
reason4113NNreason
that4114IN/thatthat
the4115DTthe
Secretary4116NPSecretary
gives4117VVZgive
as4118INas
to4119TOto
why4120WRBwhy
he4121PPhe
rejects4122VVZreject
that4123DTthat
?4124SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4125LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
So4126INso
there4127EXthere
are4128VBPbe
a4129DTa
couple4130NNcouple
of4131INof
reasons4132NNSreason
,4133,,
Your4134PP$your
Honor4135NPHonor
.4136SENT.
First4137JJfirst
of4138INof
all4139DTall
,4140,,
although4141INalthough
they4142PPthey
had4143VHDhave
a4144DTa
high4145JJhigh
confidence4146NNconfidence
that4147IN/thatthat
they4148PPthey
could4149MDcould
create4150VVcreate
a4151DTa
good4152JJgood
statistical4153JJstatistical
model4154NNmodel
,4155,,
they4156PPthey
were4157VBDbe
not4158RBnot
able4159JJable
to4160TOto
tell4161VVtell
him4162PPhim
that4163IN/thatthat
they4164PPthey
thought4165VVDthink
that4166IN/thatthat
that4167DTthat
model4168NNmodel
would4169MDwould
be4170VBbe
any4171DTany
better4172JJRgood
or4173CCor
worse4174RBRworse
an4175DTan
estimation4176NNestimation
.4177SENT.
They4178PPthey
never4179RBnever
were4180VBDbe
able4181JJable
to4182TOto
say4183VVsay
that4184WDTthat
would4185MDwould
...4186:...
it4187PPit
would4188MDwould
beat4189VVbeat
that4190IN/thatthat
984191CD@card@
percent4192NNpercent
number4193NNnumber
.4194SENT.
So4195RBso
,4196,,
in4197INin
the4198DTthe
face4199NNface
of4200INof
that4201DTthat
uncertainty4202NNuncertainty
,4203,,
he4204PPhe
reasonably4205RBreasonably
chose4206VVDchoose
...4207:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4208LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
I4209PPI
think4210VVPthink
what4211WPwhat
I4212PPI
read4213VVPread
you4214PPyou
is4215VBZbe
them4216PPthem
saying4217VVGsay
that4218IN/thatthat
they4219PPthey
could4220MDcould
beat4221VVbeat
the4222DTthe
percent4223NNpercent
number4224NNnumber
.4225SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4226LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
No4227NPNo
,4228,,
Your4229PP$your
Honor4230NPHonor
,4231,,
I4232PPI
do4233VVPdo
n't4234RBn't
think4235VVthink
that4236DTthat
's4237VBZbe
what4238WPwhat
they4239PPthey
're4240VBPbe
saying4241VVGsay
there4242RBthere
.4243SENT.
I4244PPI
think4245VVPthink
what4246WPwhat
they4247PPthey
're4248VBPbe
saying4249VVGsay
there4250EXthere
is4251VBZbe
that4252DTthat
if4253INif
you4254PPyou
ask4255VVPask
the4256DTthe
citizenship4257NNcitizenship
question4258NNquestion
,4259,,
it4260PPit
will4261MDwill
make4262VVmake
the4263DTthe
model4264NNmodel
a4265DTa
little4266JJlittle
bit4267NNbit
less4268RBRless
accurate4269JJaccurate
because4270INbecause
you4271PPyou
're4272VBPbe
going4273VVGgo
to4274TOto
have4275VHhave
fewer4276JJRfew
people4277NNSpeople
for4278INfor
whom4279WPwhom
there4280RBthere
are4281VBPbe
administrative4282JJadministrative
records4283NNSrecord
,4284,,
but4285CCbut
you4286PPyou
actually4287RBactually
have4288VHhave
to4289TOto
use4290VVuse
that4291DTthat
model4292NNmodel
for4293INfor
a4294DTa
much4295RBmuch
smaller4296JJRsmall
number4297NNnumber
of4298INof
people4299NNSpeople
because4300INbecause
you4301PPyou
have4302VHPhave
actual4303JJactual
answers4304NNSanswer
from4305INfrom
224306CD@card@
.4307SENT.
24308CD2
million4309CDmillion
at4310INat
984311CD@card@
percent4312NNpercent
accuracy4313NNaccuracy
.4314SENT.
So4315RBso
that4316DTthat
's4317VBZbe
what4318WPwhat
they4319PPthey
're4320VBPbe
saying4321VVGsay
.4322SENT.
But4323CCbut
what4324WPwhat
they4325PPthey
could4326MDcould
n't4327RBn't
come4328VVcome
down4329RPdown
with4330INwith
a4331DTa
conclusion4332NNconclusion
on4333RBon
is4334VBZbe
whether4335INwhether
it4336PPit
would4337MDwould
be4338VBbe
more4339JJRmore
or4340CCor
less4341RBRless
accurate4342JJaccurate
to4343TOto
ask4344VVask
the4345DTthe
question4346NNquestion
...4347:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4348LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
All4349DTall
right4350NNright
.4351SENT.
When4352WRBwhen
you4353PPyou
answer4354VVPanswer
this4355DTthis
question4356NNquestion
...4357:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4358LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...4359:...
or4360CCor
use4361VVuse
the4362DTthe
model4363NNmodel
.4364SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4365LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So4366RBso
can4367MDcan
I4368PPI
just4369RBjust
ask4370VVPask
...4371:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4372LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Would4373MDwould
you4374PPyou
answer4375VVanswer
this4376DTthis
question4377NNquestion
?4378SENT?
Wait4379VVwait
.4380SENT.
I4381PPI
am4382VBPbe
trying4383VVGtry
,4384,,
go4385VVgo
back4386RBback
to4387TOto
my4388PP$my
question4389NNquestion
,4390,,
to4391TOto
write4392VVwrite
down4393RPdown
the4394DTthe
pages4395NNSpage
.4396SENT.
I4397PPI
'm4398VBPbe
not4399RBnot
going4400VVGgo
to4401TOto
,4402,,
you4403PPyou
know4404VVPknow
,4405,,
resolve4406VVresolve
this4407DTthis
right4408NNright
now4409RBnow
.4410SENT.
So4411RBso
,4412,,
when4413WRBwhen
Justice4414NPJustice
Kagan4415NPKagan
asked4416VVDask
the4417DTthe
question4418NNquestion
or4419CCor
I4420PPI
do4421VVPdo
,4422,,
you4423PPyou
've4424VHPhave
mentioned4425VVNmention
page4426NNpage
1484427CD@card@
.4428SENT.
Insofar4429RBinsofar
in4430INin
answer4431NNanswer
to4432TOto
her4433PP$her
question4434NNquestion
or4435CCor
to4436TOto
mine4437NNmine
,4438,,
if4439INif
you4440PPyou
could4441MDcould
give4442VVgive
me4443PPme
a4444DTa
few4445JJfew
things4446NNSthing
to4447TOto
read4448VVread
to4449TOto
show4450VVshow
that4451IN/thatthat
he4452PPhe
did4453VVDdo
consider4454VVconsider
it4455PPit
,4456,,
to4457TOto
show4458VVshow
that4459IN/thatthat
he4460PPhe
did4461VVDdo
give4462VVgive
a4463DTa
reason4464NNreason
for4465INfor
rejecting4466VVGreject
it4467PPit
,4468,,
that4469WDTthat
would4470MDwould
be4471VBbe
helpful4472JJhelpful
to4473TOto
me4474PPme
.4475SENT.
Sorry4476RBsorry
.4477SENT.
Go4478VVgo
back4479RBback
to4480TOto
you4481PPyou
.4482SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4483LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
So4484RBso
,4485,,
Your4486PP$your
Honor4487NPHonor
,4488,,
if4489INif
you4490PPyou
look4491VVPlook
at4492INat
Secretary4493NPSecretary
Ross4494NPRoss
's4495POS's
decision4496NNdecision
memo4497NNmemo
,4498,,
the4499DTthe
pre-4500NNpre-
...4501:...
the4502DTthe
decision4503NNdecision
memo4504NNmemo
in4505INin
the4506DTthe
Petitioners4507NNSpetitioner
'4508POS'
appendix4509NNappendix
,4510,,
I4511PPI
would4512MDwould
look4513VVlook
to4514TOto
a4515DTa
couple4516NNcouple
of4517INof
things4518NNSthing
.4519SENT.
First4520JJfirst
of4521INof
all4522DTall
,4523,,
I4524PPI
would4525MDwould
look4526VVlook
to4527TOto
his4528PP$his
discussion4529NNdiscussion
on4530INon
pages4531NNSpage
555a4532NN555a
with4533INwith
the4534DTthe
problems4535NNSproblem
with4536INwith
administrative4537JJadministrative
records4538NNSrecord
.4539SENT.
The4540DTthe
bureau4541NNbureau
is4542VBZbe
still4543RBstill
evolving4544VVGevolve
its4545PP$its
use4546NNuse
of4547INof
administrative4548JJadministrative
records4549NNSrecord
,4550,,
and4551CCand
the4552DTthe
bureau4553NNbureau
does4554VVZdo
not4555RBnot
yet4556RByet
have4557VHhave
complete4558JJcomplete
administrative4559JJadministrative
records4560NNSrecord
data4561NNSdatum
set4562VVNset
for4563INfor
the4564DTthe
entire4565JJentire
population4566NNpopulation
.4567SENT.
And4568CCand
that4569DTthat
points4570NNSpoint
out4571INout
why4572WRBwhy
he4573PPhe
preferred4574VVDprefer
asking4575VVGask
the4576DTthe
question4577NNquestion
and4578CCand
getting4579VVGget
actual4580JJactual
answers4581NNSanswer
from4582INfrom
224583CD@card@
.4584SENT.
24585CD2
million4586CDmillion
people4587NNSpeople
at4588INat
984589CD@card@
percent4590NNpercent
accuracy4591NNaccuracy
,4592,,
because4593INbecause
you4594PPyou
simply4595RBsimply
did4596VVDdo
n't4597RBn't
have4598VHhave
administrative4599JJadministrative
records4600NNSrecord
for4601INfor
354602CD@card@
million4603CDmillion
people4604NNSpeople
,4605,,
and4606CCand
the4607DTthe
bureau4608NNbureau
had4609VHDhave
not4610RBnot
yet4611RByet
figured4612VVNfigure
out4613INout
how4614WRBhow
to4615TOto
do4616VVdo
that4617DTthat
estimation4618NNestimation
.4619SENT.
He4620PPhe
then4621RBthen
goes4622VVZgo
on4623RPon
to4624TOto
say4625VVsay
on4626INon
that4627DTthat
same4628JJsame
page4629NNpage
,4630,,
more4631JJRmore
than4632INthan
104633CD@card@
percent4634NNpercent
of4635INof
the4636DTthe
American4637JJAmerican
population4638NNpopulation
,4639,,
some4640DTsome
254641CD@card@
million4642CDmillion
voting-age4643NNvoting-age
people4644NNSpeople
,4645,,
would4646MDwould
need4647VVneed
to4648TOto
have4649VHhave
their4650PP$their
citizen4651NNcitizen
age4652NNage
imputed4653VVNimpute
by4654INby
the4655DTthe
Census4656NPCensus
Bureau4657NPBureau
.4658SENT.
And4659CCand
so4660RBso
he4661PPhe
was4662VBDbe
making4663VVGmake
clear4664JJclear
that4665IN/thatthat
he4666PPhe
'd4667MDwould
rather4668RBrather
go4669VVgo
with4670INwith
actual4671JJactual
counting4672NNcounting
than4673INthan
imputation4674NNimputation
.4675SENT.
And4676CCand
he4677PPhe
pointed4678VVDpoint
out4679RPout
that4680IN/thatthat
by4681INby
proceeding4682VVGproceed
with4683INwith
his4684PP$his
preferred4685JJpreferred
course4686NNcourse
...4687:...
this4688DTthis
is4689VBZbe
at4690INat
page4691NNpage
556a4692NN556a
of4693INof
the4694DTthe
Petitioners4695NNSpetitioner
'4696POS'
appendix4697NNappendix
...4698:...
this4699DTthis
may4700MDmay
eliminate4701VVeliminate
the4702DTthe
need4703NNneed
for4704INfor
the4705DTthe
Census4706NPCensus
Bureau4707NPBureau
to4708TOto
have4709VHhave
to4710TOto
impute4711VVimpute
an4712DTan
answer4713NNanswer
for4714INfor
millions4715NNSmillion
of4716INof
people4717NNSpeople
,4718,,
specifically4719RBspecifically
about4720INabout
224721CD@card@
.4722SENT.
24723CD2
million4724CDmillion
people4725NNSpeople
for4726INfor
whom4727WPwhom
the4728DTthe
bureau4729NNbureau
...4730:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4731LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But4732CCbut
...4733:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4734LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...4735:...
told4736VVDtell
him4737PPhim
he4738PPhe
would4739MDwould
get4740VVget
actual4741JJactual
answers4742NNSanswer
at4743INat
984744CD@card@
percent4745NNpercent
accuracy4746NNaccuracy
.4747SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4748LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...4749:...
if4750INif
I4751PPI
may4752MDmay
say4753VVsay
,4754,,
General4755NPGeneral
,4756,,
when4757WRBwhen
you4758PPyou
think4759VVPthink
about4760INabout
those4761DTthose
statements4762NNSstatement
,4763,,
I4764PPI
mean4765VVPmean
,4766,,
it4767PPit
's4768VBZbe
just4769RBjust
conclusory4770JJconclusory
.4771SENT.
It4772PPit
's4773VBZbe
just4774RBjust
like4775JJlike
,4776,,
well4777RBwell
,4778,,
this4779DTthis
would4780MDwould
eliminate4781VVeliminate
the4782DTthe
...4783:...
the4784DTthe
...4785:...
the4786DTthe
need4787NNneed
for4788INfor
modeling4789VVGmodel
because4790INbecause
we4791PPwe
could4792MDcould
ask4793VVask
a4794DTa
question4795NNquestion
.4796SENT.
But4797CCbut
the4798DTthe
question4799NNquestion
is4800VBZbe
,4801,,
why4802WRBwhy
is4803VBZbe
asking4804VVGask
a4805DTa
question4806NNquestion
better4807RBRwell
when4808WRBwhen
you4809PPyou
know4810VVPknow
that4811IN/thatthat
asking4812VVGask
a4813DTa
question4814NNquestion
is4815VBZbe
going4816VVGgo
to4817TOto
result4818VVresult
in4819INin
lots4820NNSlot
of4821INof
non-responses4822NNSnon-responses
and4823CCand
in4824INin
lots4825NNSlot
of4826INof
false4827JJfalse
reporting4828NNreporting
?4829SENT?
And4830CCand
so4831RBso
you4832PPyou
can4833MDcan
't4834RB't
just4835RBjust
go4836VVgo
back4837RBback
to4838TOto
I4839PPI
'd4840MDwould
rather4841RBrather
ask4842VVask
a4843DTa
question4844NNquestion
.4845SENT.
You4846PPyou
have4847VHPhave
to4848TOto
say4849VVsay
why4850WRBwhy
you4851PPyou
'd4852MDwould
rather4853RBrather
ask4854VVask
a4855DTa
question4856NNquestion
and4857CCand
what4858WPwhat
benefits4859VVZbenefit
it4860PPit
has4861VHZhave
to4862TOto
ask4863VVask
a4864DTa
question4865NNquestion
.4866SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4867LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right4868NPRight
.4869SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4870LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
And4871CCand
if4872INif
I4873PPI
may4874MDmay
say4875VVsay
...4876:...
I4877PPI
'll4878MDwill
just4879RBjust
finish4880VVfinish
here4881RBhere
,4882,,
General4883NPGeneral
...4884:...
I4885PPI
mean4886VVPmean
,4887,,
a4888DTa
lot4889NNlot
of4890INof
your4891PP$your
argument4892NNargument
...4893:...
your4894PP$your
briefs4895NNSbrief
are4896VBPbe
extremely4897RBextremely
well4898RBwell
done4899VVNdo
.4900SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4901LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Thank4902VVthank
you4903PPyou
.4904SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4905LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But4906CCbut
a4907DTa
lot4908NNlot
of4909INof
your4910PP$your
argument4911NNargument
just4912RBjust
do4913VVPdo
not4914RBnot
appear4915VVappear
in4916INin
the4917DTthe
Secretary4918NPSecretary
's4919POS's
decision4920NNdecision
memo4921NNmemo
.4922SENT.
And4923CCand
...4924:...
and4925CCand
the4926DTthe
fact4927NNfact
that4928IN/thatthat
SG4929NPSG
lawyers4930NNSlawyer
can4931MDcan
come4932VVcome
up4933RPup
with4934INwith
604935CD@card@
pages4936NNSpage
of4937INof
explanation4938NNexplanation
for4939INfor
a4940DTa
decision4941NNdecision
,4942,,
that4943WDTthat
's4944VBZbe
all4945DTall
post4946NNpost
hoc4947FWhoc
rationalization4948NNrationalization
.4949SENT.
The4950DTthe
question4951NNquestion
is4952VBZbe
,4953,,
what4954WPwhat
did4955VVDdo
the4956DTthe
Secretary4957NPSecretary
say4958VVPsay
?4959SENT?
Where4960WRBwhere
did4961VVDdo
he4962PPhe
say4963VVPsay
it4964PPit
?4965SENT?
When4966WRBwhen
did4967VVDdo
he4968PPhe
say4969VVPsay
it4970PPit
?4971SENT?
What4972WPWhat
does4973VVZdo
it4974PPit
mean4975VVPmean
,4976,,
other4977JJother
than4978INthan
just4979RBjust
ipse4980JJipse
dixit4981NNdixit
and4982CCand
conclusions4983NNSconclusion
?4984SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]4985LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure4986NPSure
.4987SENT.
Your4988PP$your
...4989:...
Your4990PP$your
Honor4991NPHonor
,4992,,
I4993PPI
...4994:...
I4995PPI
'm4996VBPbe
tempted4997VVNtempt
to4998TOto
pocket4999VVpocket
the5000DTthe
compliment5001NNcompliment
and5002CCand
sit5003VVsit
down5004RPdown
,5005,,
but5006CCbut
I5007PPI
won5008MDwill
't5009RB't
do5010VVdo
that5011DTthat
.5012SENT.
[5013SYM[
LAUGHTER5014NNlaughter
]5015SYM]
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5016LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
I5017PPI
think5018VVPthink
the5019DTthe
Secretary5020NPSecretary
fully5021RBfully
acknowledged5022VVDacknowledge
that5023IN/thatthat
there5024EXthere
was5025VBDbe
an5026DTan
upside5027NNupside
to5028TOto
the5029DTthe
request5030NNrequest
,5031,,
and5032CCand
the5033DTthe
upside5034NNupside
was5035VBDbe
the5036DTthe
one5037CDone
that5038IN/thatthat
the5039DTthe
Department5040NPDepartment
of5041INof
Justice5042NPJustice
set5043VVDset
forth5044RBforth
in5045INin
its5046PP$its
letter5047NNletter
,5048,,
that5049IN/thatthat
having5050VHGhave
citizenship5051NNcitizenship
data5052NNSdatum
would5053MDwould
help5054VVhelp
improve5055VVimprove
Voting5056NPVoting
Rights5057NPSRights
Act5058NPAct
enforcement5059NNenforcement
.5060SENT.
He5061PPhe
fully5062RBfully
understood5063VVDunderstand
there5064EXthere
was5065VBDbe
an5066DTan
alternative5067NNalternative
,5068,,
using5069VVGuse
administrative5070JJadministrative
records5071NNSrecord
,5072,,
and5073CCand
he5074PPhe
analyzed5075VVDanalyze
that5076DTthat
alternative5077NNalternative
in5078INin
the5079DTthe
language5080NNlanguage
that5081IN/thatthat
I5082PPI
just5083RBjust
read5084VVPread
to5085TOto
Justice5086NPJustice
Breyer5087NPBreyer
,5088,,
and5089CCand
he5090PPhe
understood5091VVDunderstand
there5092EXthere
was5093VBDbe
a5094DTa
downside5095NNdownside
,5096,,
that5097IN/thatthat
adding5098VVGadd
the5099DTthe
citizenship5100NNcitizenship
question5101NNquestion
would5102MDwould
potentially5103RBpotentially
increase5104VVincrease
self-response5105NNself-response
...5106:...
decrease5107NNdecrease
...5108:...
increase5109VVincrease
the5110DTthe
number5111NNnumber
of5112INof
...5113:...
decrease5114VVdecrease
the5115DTthe
number5116NNnumber
of5117INof
self-response5118JJself-response
rates5119NNSrate
.5120SENT.
But5121CCbut
he5122PPhe
found5123VVDfind
two5124CDtwo
things5125NNSthing
with5126INwith
respect5127NNrespect
to5128TOto
that5129DTthat
.5130SENT.
First5131RBfirst
,5132,,
he5133PPhe
found5134VVDfind
...5135:...
and5136CCand
all5137DTall
of5138INof
this5139DTthis
is5140VBZbe
in5141INin
his5142PP$his
letter5143NNletter
...5144:...
that5145IN/thatthat
he5146PPhe
could5147MDcould
mitigate5148VVmitigate
that5149IN/thatthat
to5150TOto
at5151INat
least5152JJSleast
a5153DTa
certain5154JJcertain
extent5155NNextent
with5156INwith
follow-up5157NNfollow-up
operations5158NNSoperation
,5159,,
perhaps5160RBperhaps
not5161RBnot
entirely5162RBentirely
but5163CCbut
at5164INat
least5165JJSleast
to5166TOto
a5167DTa
certain5168JJcertain
extent5169NNextent
,5170,,
and5171CCand
,5172,,
secondly5173RBsecondly
,5174,,
to5175TOto
the5176DTthe
extent5177NNextent
that5178WDTthat
materialized5179VVDmaterialize
,5180,,
it5181PPit
was5182VBDbe
the5183DTthe
product5184NNproduct
of5185INof
illegal5186JJillegal
activity5187NNactivity
.5188SENT.
So5189RBso
he5190PPhe
considered5191VVDconsider
the5192DTthe
benefits5193NNSbenefit
.5194SENT.
He5195PPhe
considered5196VVDconsider
the5197DTthe
alternatives5198NNSalternative
.5199SENT.
He5200PPhe
considered5201VVDconsider
the5202DTthe
costs5203NNScost
...5204:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5205LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Which5206WDTwhich
...5207:...
which5208WDTwhich
letter5209NNletter
...5210:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5211LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...5212:...
and5213CCand
he5214PPhe
concluded5215VVDconclude
that5216IN/thatthat
the5217DTthe
benefits5218NNSbenefit
outweighed5219VVDoutweigh
the5220DTthe
costs5221NNScost
.5222SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5223LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
General5224NPGeneral
,5225,,
which5226WDTwhich
letter5227NNletter
are5228VBPbe
we5229PPwe
talking5230VVGtalk
about5231RBabout
?5232SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5233LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Secretary5234NPSecretary
Ross5235NPRoss
's5236POS's
decision5237NNdecision
memo5238NNmemo
in5239INin
March5240NPMarch
20185241CD@card@
,5242,,
Your5243PP$your
Honor5244NPHonor
.5245SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5246LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
The5247DTthe
memo5248NNmemo
,5249,,
not5250RBnot
...5251:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5252LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
The5253DTthe
memo5254NNmemo
,5255,,
yes5256UHyes
,5257,,
Your5258PP$your
Honor5259NPHonor
.5260SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5261LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...5262:...
not5263RBnot
the5264DTthe
letter5265NNletter
from5266INfrom
...5267:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5268LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yeah5269NPYeah
.5270SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5271LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...5272:...
Department5273NPDepartment
of5274INof
Justice5275NPJustice
.5276SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5277LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yes5278NPYes
,5279,,
Your5280PP$your
Honor5281NPHonor
,5282,,
the5283DTthe
memo5284NNmemo
.5285SENT.
But5286CCbut
the5287DTthe
Department5288NPDepartment
of5289INof
Justice5290NPJustice
's5291POS's
letter5292NNletter
is5293VBZbe
the5294DTthe
one5295CDone
that5296WDTthat
articulated5297VVDarticulate
the5298DTthe
Voting5299NPVoting
Rights5300NPSRights
Act5301NPAct
rationale5302NNrationale
that5303WDTthat
formed5304VVDform
...5305:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5306LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Can5307MDcan
you5308PPyou
explain5309VVexplain
...5310:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5311LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...5312:...
the5313DTthe
principal5314JJprincipal
benefit5315NNbenefit
.5316SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5317LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...5318:...
can5319MDcan
you5320PPyou
explain5321VVexplain
how5322WRBhow
it5323PPit
would5324MDwould
improve5325VVimprove
Voting5326NPVoting
Rights5327NPSRights
Act5328NPAct
enforcement5329NNenforcement
?5330SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5331LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yes5332NPYes
,5333,,
Your5334PP$your
Honor5335NPHonor
.5336SENT.
One5337CDOne
of5338INof
the5339DTthe
critical5340JJcritical
elements5341NNSelement
of5342INof
Voting5343NPVoting
Rights5344NPSRights
Act5345NPAct
enforcement5346NNenforcement
is5347VBZbe
something5348NNsomething
called5349VVNcall
Citizen5350NPCitizen
Voting5351NPVoting
Age5352NPAge
Population5353NPPopulation
,5354,,
or5355CCor
CVAP5356NPCVAP
.5357SENT.
Right5358RBright
now5359RBnow
,5360,,
everything5361NNeverything
for5362INfor
CVAP5363NPCVAP
comes5364VVZcome
from5365INfrom
the5366DTthe
census5367NNcensus
,5368,,
with5369INwith
the5370DTthe
exception5371NNexception
of5372INof
citizenship5373NNcitizenship
.5374SENT.
So5375INso
population5376NNpopulation
,5377,,
age5378NNage
,5379,,
race5380NNrace
,5381,,
all5382DTall
of5383INof
that5384WDTthat
comes5385VVZcome
from5386INfrom
the5387DTthe
census5388NNcensus
,5389,,
except5390INexcept
for5391INfor
citizenship5392NNcitizenship
,5393,,
the5394DTthe
C5395NPC
in5396INin
CVAP5397NPCVAP
.5398SENT.
So5399INso
a5400DTa
large5401JJlarge
amount5402NNamount
of5403INof
voting5404NNvoting
rights5405NNSright
litigation5406NNlitigation
focuses5407VVZfocus
on5408INon
expert5409NNexpert
witnesses5410NNSwitness
who5411WPwho
try5412VVPtry
to5413TOto
fill5414VVfill
in5415INin
that5416DTthat
missing5417VVGmiss
C5418NPC
and5419CCand
try5420VVtry
to5421TOto
estimate5422VVestimate
that5423IN/thatthat
missing5424VVGmiss
C5425NPC
through5426INthrough
imputation5427NNimputation
based5428VVNbase
on5429INon
the5430DTthe
American5431NPAmerican
Community5432NPCommunity
Survey5433NPSurvey
,5434,,
which5435WDTwhich
goes5436VVZgo
to5437TOto
just5438RBjust
one5439CDone
in5440INin
385441CD@card@
households5442NNShousehold
.5443SENT.
And5444CCand
the5445DTthe
Department5446NPDepartment
of5447INof
Justice5448NPJustice
wanted5449VVDwant
to5450TOto
get5451VVget
all5452DTall
of5453INof
the5454DTthe
same5455JJsame
information5456NNinformation
from5457INfrom
the5458DTthe
same5459JJsame
database5460NNdatabase
so5461INso
that5462DTthat
critical5463JJcritical
feature5464NNfeature
of5465INof
voting5466NNvoting
rights5467NNSright
litigation5468NNlitigation
,5469,,
CVAP5470NPCVAP
,5471,,
all5472DTall
came5473VVDcome
from5474INfrom
the5475DTthe
same5476JJsame
place5477NNplace
.5478SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5479LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
General5480NPGeneral
...5481:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]5482LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
And5483CCand
to5484TOto
just5485RBjust
...5486:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5487LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...5488:...
how5489WRBhow
do5490VVPdo
we5491PPwe
know5492VVPknow
that5493IN/thatthat
DOJ5494NPDOJ
could5495MDcould
n't5496RBn't
do5497VVdo
Alternative5498NPAlternative
C5499NPC
,5500,,
rely5501VVPrely
on5502INon
the5503DTthe
administrative5504JJadministrative
records5505NNSrecord
?5506SENT?
The5507DTthe
one5508CDone
thing5509NNthing
that5510IN/thatthat
we5511PPwe
do5512VVPdo
know5513VVknow
is5514VBZbe
that5515IN/thatthat
the5516DTthe
Secretary5517NPSecretary
went5518VVDgo
to5519TOto
the5520DTthe
Department5521NPDepartment
...5522:...
went5523VVDgo
to5524TOto
DOJ5525NPDOJ
at5526INat
the5527DTthe
beginning5528NNbeginning
and5529CCand
asked5530VVDask
them5531PPthem
for5532INfor
help5533NNhelp
in5534INin
adding5535VVGadd
the5536DTthe
citizenship5537NNcitizenship
question5538NNquestion
.5539SENT.
They5540PPthey
initially5541RBinitially
said5542VVDsay
no5543UHno
.5544SENT.
At5545INat
least5546JJSleast
their5547PP$their
lower-level5548JJlower-level
people5549NNSpeople
said5550VVDsay
no5551RBno
,5552,,
told5553VVDtell
them5554PPthem
to5555TOto
shop5556VVshop
it5557PPit
to5558TOto
DHS5559NPDHS
and5560CCand
see5561VVsee
if5562INif
DHS5563NPDHS
wanted5564VVDwant
the5565DTthe
citizenship5566NNcitizenship
question5567NNquestion
.5568SENT.
DHS5569NNSDHS
said5570VVDsay
not5571RBnot
our5572PP$our
work5573NNwork
...5574:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5575LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Uh-huh5576NPUh-huh
.5577SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5578LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...5579:...
go5580VVgo
back5581RBback
to5582TOto
DOJ5583NPDOJ
.5584SENT.
They5585PPthey
go5586VVPgo
back5587RBback
to5588TOto
DOJ5589NPDOJ
,5590,,
the5591DTthe
people5592NNSpeople
they5593PPthey
're5594VBPbe
in5595INin
touch5596NNtouch
with5597INwith
,5598,,
that5599WDTthat
are5600VBPbe
not5601RBnot
low-level5602JJlow-level
,5603,,
but5604CCbut
they5605PPthey
're5606VBPbe
not5607RBnot
the5608DTthe
highest5609JJShigh
level5610NNlevel
,5611,,
say5612VVPsay
no5613RBno
.5614SENT.
And5615CCand
Secretary5616NPSecretary
of5617INof
Commerce5618NPCommerce
speaks5619VVZspeak
to5620TOto
the5621DTthe
head5622NNhead
of5623INof
DOJ5624NPDOJ
at5625INat
the5626DTthe
time5627NNtime
...5628:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5629LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Uh-huh5630NPUh-huh
.5631SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5632LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...5633:...
and5634CCand
the5635DTthe
head5636NNhead
of5637INof
the5638DTthe
DOJ5639NPDOJ
says5640VVZsay
:5641::
We5642PPwe
'll5643MDwill
give5644VVgive
you5645PPyou
anything5646NNanything
you5647PPyou
need5648VVPneed
.5649SENT.
They5650PPthey
do5651VVPdo
a5652DTa
letter5653NNletter
,5654,,
the5655DTthe
letter5656NNletter
says5657VVZsay
the5658DTthe
ACS5659NPACS
is5660VBZbe
not5661RBnot
enough5662JJenough
.5663SENT.
What5664WPWhat
the5665DTthe
letter5666NNletter
does5667VVZdo
n't5668RBn't
say5669VVsay
is5670VBZbe
,5671,,
ah5672NNah
,5673,,
if5674INif
you5675PPyou
supplemented5676VVDsupplement
with5677INwith
administrative5678JJadministrative
records5679NNSrecord
,5680,,
which5681WDTwhich
65682CD6
(5683((
c5684LSc
)5685))
lets5686VVZlet
you5687PPyou
do5688VVPdo
and5689CCand
tells5690VVZtell
you5691PPyou
you5692PPyou
should5693MDshould
do5694VVdo
to5695TOto
maximize5696VVmaximize
the5697DTthe
extent5698NNextent
possible5699JJpossible
that5700IN/thatthat
the5701DTthe
actual5702JJactual
count5703NNcount
is5704VBZbe
accurate5705JJaccurate
,5706,,
and5707CCand
we5708PPwe
do5709VVPdo
know5710VVknow
that5711IN/thatthat
there5712EXthere
will5713MDwill
be5714VBbe
less5715JJRless
people5716NNSpeople
being5717VBGbe
reported5718VVNreport
,5719,,
which5720WDTwhich
is5721VBZbe
the5722DTthe
whole5723JJwhole
purpose5724NNpurpose
of5725INof
the5726DTthe
survey5727NNsurvey
...5728:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5729LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Uh-huh5730NPUh-huh
.5731SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5732LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...5733:...
how5734WRBhow
many5735JJmany
people5736NNSpeople
there5737EXthere
are5738VBPbe
,5739,,
and5740CCand
nobody5741NNnobody
doubts5742VVZdoubt
that5743IN/thatthat
there5744EXthere
will5745MDwill
be5746VBbe
less5747JJRless
people5748NNSpeople
reported5749VVDreport
.5750SENT.
That5751DTthat
's5752VBZbe
a5753DTa
maximum5754JJmaximum
need5755NNneed
of5756INof
the5757DTthe
census5758NNcensus
survey5759NNsurvey
report5760NNreport
,5761,,
not5762RBnot
citizenship5763NNcitizenship
.5764SENT.
Let5765NPLet
's5766POS's
not5767RBnot
confuse5768VVconfuse
the5769DTthe
two5770CDtwo
things5771NNSthing
.5772SENT.
The5773DTthe
enumeration5774NNenumeration
is5775VBZbe
how5776WRBhow
many5777JJmany
people5778NNSpeople
reside5779VVPreside
here5780RBhere
,5781,,
not5782RBnot
how5783WRBhow
many5784JJmany
are5785VBPbe
citizens5786NNScitizen
.5787SENT.
That5788DTthat
's5789VBZbe
what5790WPwhat
the5791DTthe
census5792NNcensus
survey5793NNsurvey
is5794VBZbe
supposed5795VVNsuppose
to5796TOto
figure5797VVfigure
out5798RPout
.5799SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5800LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Uh-huh5801NPUh-huh
.5802SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5803LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
DOJ5804NPDOJ
needs5805VVZneed
citizenship5806NNcitizenship
.5807SENT.
But5808CCbut
,5809,,
when5810WRBwhen
the5811DTthe
Bureau5812NPBureau
asks5813VVZask
DOJ5814NPDOJ
,5815,,
not5816RBnot
the5817DTthe
Secretary5818NPSecretary
,5819,,
to5820TOto
meet5821VVmeet
so5822INso
they5823PPthey
can5824MDcan
discuss5825VVdiscuss
why5826WRBwhy
the5827DTthe
administrative5828JJadministrative
records5829NNSrecord
are5830VBPbe
not5831RBnot
good5832JJgood
enough5833RBenough
,5834,,
they5835PPthey
say5836VVPsay
,5837,,
we5838PPwe
do5839VVPdo
n't5840RBn't
need5841VVneed
to5842TOto
.5843SENT.
So5844RBso
tell5845VVtell
me5846PPme
,5847,,
in5848INin
that5849DTthat
sequence5850NNsequence
,5851,,
how5852WRBhow
does5853VVZdo
the5854DTthe
Secretary5855NPSecretary
know5856VVPknow
the5857DTthe
answer5858NNanswer
...5859:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5860LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure5861NPSure
.5862SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5863LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...5864:...
to5865TOto
that5866DTthat
question5867NNquestion
?5868SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]5869LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure5870NPSure
.5871SENT.
So5872INso
a5873DTa
couple5874NNcouple
of5875INof
responses5876NNSresponse
to5877TOto
that5878DTthat
,5879,,
Your5880PP$your
Honor5881NPHonor
.5882SENT.
I5883PPI
'm5884VBPbe
going5885VVGgo
to5886TOto
start5887VVstart
with5888INwith
the5889DTthe
65890CD6
(5891((
c5892LSc
)5893))
issue5894VVissue
because5895INbecause
I5896PPI
know5897VVPknow
that5898WDTthat
was5899VBDbe
of5900INof
interest5901NNinterest
to5902TOto
Justice5903NPJustice
Breyer5904NPBreyer
as5905RBas
well5906RBwell
.5907SENT.
And5908CCand
under5909INunder
65910CD6
(5911((
c5912LSc
)5913))
,5914,,
under5915INunder
my5916PP$my
...5917:...
my5918PP$my
friend5919NNfriend
's5920VBZbe
on5921INon
the5922DTthe
other5923JJother
side5924NNside
's5925POS's
position5926NNposition
,5927,,
you5928PPyou
actually5929RBactually
could5930MDcould
n't5931RBn't
even5932RBeven
ask5933VVask
the5934DTthe
citizenship5935NNcitizenship
question5936NNquestion
on5937INon
the5938DTthe
American5939NPAmerican
Community5940NPCommunity
Survey5941NPSurvey
.5942SENT.
And5943CCand
you5944PPyou
also5945RBalso
could5946MDcould
n't5947RBn't
ask5948VVask
about5949INabout
sex5950NNsex
and5951CCand
age5952NNage
on5953INon
the5954DTthe
census5955NNcensus
itself5956PPitself
since5957INsince
all5958DTall
of5959INof
that5960DTthat
information5961NNinformation
is5962VBZbe
all5963DTall
also5964RBalso
available5965JJavailable
in5966INin
administrative5967JJadministrative
records5968NNSrecord
.5969SENT.
But5970CCbut
the5971DTthe
reason5972NNreason
why5973WRBwhy
administrative5974JJadministrative
records5975NNSrecord
are5976VBPbe
insufficient5977JJinsufficient
under5978INunder
65979CD6
(5980((
c5981LSc
)5982))
for5983INfor
any5984DTany
of5985INof
these5986DTthese
purposes5987NNSpurpose
is5988VBZbe
for5989INfor
the5990DTthe
simple5991JJsimple
reason5992NNreason
that5993IN/thatthat
you5994PPyou
do5995VVPdo
n't5996RBn't
have5997VHhave
them5998PPthem
for5999INfor
356000CD@card@
million6001CDmillion
people6002NNSpeople
.6003SENT.
In6004INin
terms6005NNSterm
of6006INof
the6007DTthe
Department6008NPDepartment
of6009INof
Justice6010NPJustice
's6011POS's
request6012NNrequest
and6013CCand
the6014DTthe
Census6015NPCensus
Bureau6016NPBureau
's6017POS's
alternative6018JJalternative
proposal6019NNproposal
,6020,,
it6021PPit
simply6022RBsimply
was6023VBDbe
n't6024RBn't
responsive6025JJresponsive
to6026TOto
the6027DTthe
Department6028NPDepartment
of6029INof
Justice6030NPJustice
's6031POS's
request6032NNrequest
for6033INfor
two6034CDtwo
reasons6035NNSreason
.6036SENT.
First6037RBfirst
,6038,,
administrative6039JJadministrative
records6040NNSrecord
did6041VVDdo
n't6042RBn't
solve6043VVsolve
the6044DTthe
problem6045NNproblem
that6046IN/thatthat
the6047DTthe
Department6048NPDepartment
of6049INof
Justice6050NPJustice
was6051VBDbe
trying6052VVGtry
to6053TOto
solve6054VVsolve
,6055,,
which6056WDTwhich
was6057VBDbe
getting6058VVGget
all6059DTall
of6060INof
their6061PP$their
CVAP6062NPCVAP
data6063NNSdatum
from6064INfrom
the6065DTthe
same6066JJsame
source6067NNsource
and6068CCand
covering6069VVGcover
the6070DTthe
same6071JJsame
time6072NNtime
period6073NNperiod
.6074SENT.
Administrative6075JJadministrative
records6076NNSrecord
come6077VVNcome
from6078INfrom
a6079DTa
different6080JJdifferent
database6081NNdatabase
and6082CCand
cover6083VVcover
a6084DTa
different6085JJdifferent
time6086NNtime
period6087NNperiod
than6088INthan
all6089DTall
of6090INof
the6091DTthe
other6092JJother
information6093NNinformation
used6094VVNuse
to6095TOto
construct6096VVconstruct
Citizen6097NPCitizen
Voting6098NPVoting
Age6099NPAge
Population6100NPPopulation
.6101SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6102LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That6103DTthat
does6104VVZdo
n't6105RBn't
tell6106VVtell
you6107PPyou
why6108WRBwhy
it6109PPit
's6110VBZbe
not6111RBnot
good6112JJgood
enough6113RBenough
.6114SENT.
They6115PPthey
may6116MDmay
have6117VHhave
wanted6118VVNwant
something6119NNsomething
.6120SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6121LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Sure6122NPSure
.6123SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6124LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But6125CCbut
they6126PPthey
would6127MDwould
then6128RBthen
be6129VBbe
introduced6130VVNintroduce
with6131INwith
one6132CDone
database6133NNdatabase
that6134WDTthat
has6135VHZhave
been6136VBNbe
,6137,,
according6138VVGaccord
to6139TOto
the6140DTthe
chief6141JJchief
statistician6142NNstatistician
of6143INof
the6144DTthe
Bureau6145NPBureau
,6146,,
introducing6147VVGintroduce
multiple6148JJmultiple
layers6149NNSlayer
of6150INof
uncertainty6151NNuncertainty
.6152SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6153LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right6154NPRight
.6155SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6156LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Uncertainty6157NNuncertainty
about6158INabout
or6159CCor
an6160DTan
undercount6161NNundercount
of6162INof
people6163NNSpeople
because6164INbecause
they6165PPthey
already6166RBalready
say6167VVPsay
that6168IN/thatthat
undercount6169NNundercount
's6170VBZbe
going6171VVGgo
to6172TOto
be6173VBbe
at6174INat
a6175DTa
minimum6176JJminimum
56177CD5
.6178SENT.
86179CD8
,6180,,
less6181JJRless
people6182NNSpeople
are6183VBPbe
going6184VVGgo
to6185TOto
respond6186VVrespond
.6187SENT.
You6188PPyou
're6189VBPbe
going6190VVGgo
to6191TOto
have6192VHhave
a6193DTa
lesser6194JJRlesser
number6195NNnumber
that6196WDTthat
are6197VBPbe
going6198VVGgo
to6199TOto
group6200NNgroup
with6201INwith
the6202DTthe
administrative6203JJadministrative
record6204NNrecord
.6205SENT.
You6206PPyou
're6207VBPbe
going6208VVGgo
to6209TOto
have6210VHhave
96211CD9
.6212SENT.
56213CD5
million6214CDmillion
that6215DTthat
conflict6216NNconflict
between6217INbetween
their6218PP$their
answer6219NNanswer
and6220CCand
the6221DTthe
administrative6222JJadministrative
records6223NNSrecord
.6224SENT.
And6225CCand
we6226PPwe
have6227VHPhave
to6228TOto
change6229VVchange
the6230DTthe
bureau6231NNbureau
's6232POS's
use6233NNuse
of6234INof
that6235DTthat
information6236NNinformation
to6237TOto
be6238VBbe
able6239JJable
to6240TOto
use6241VVuse
the6242DTthe
administrative6243JJadministrative
record6244NNrecord
.6245SENT.
And6246CCand
the6247DTthe
Secretary6248NPSecretary
does6249VVZdo
n't6250RBn't
ask6251VVask
,6252,,
if6253INif
we6254PPwe
change6255VVPchange
that6256IN/thatthat
,6257,,
what6258WPwhat
else6259RBelse
will6260MDwill
it6261PPit
affect6262VVaffect
?6263SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6264LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right6265NPRight
.6266SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6267LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So6268INso
he6269PPhe
does6270VVZdo
n't6271RBn't
know6272VVknow
that6273DTthat
.6274SENT.
And6275CCand
we6276PPwe
now6277RBnow
have6278VHPhave
error6279NNerror
in6280INin
the6281DTthe
unreporting6282JJunreporting
population6283NNpopulation
of6284INof
at6285INat
least6286JJSleast
500,0006287CD@card@
.6288SENT.
So6289INso
something6290NNsomething
the6291DTthe
chief6292JJchief
statistician6293NNstatistician
of6294INof
the6295DTthe
bureau6296NNbureau
tells6297VVZtell
us6298PPus
is6299VBZbe
,6300,,
unlike6301INunlike
our6302PP$our
simpler6303JJRsimple
prior6304JJprior
models6305NNSmodel
,6306,,
this6307DTthis
introduces6308VVZintroduce
more6309JJRmore
uncertainty6310NNuncertainty
at6311INat
every6312DTevery
single6313JJsingle
level6314NNlevel
of6315INof
the6316DTthe
calculus6317NNcalculus
.6318SENT.
And6319CCand
so6320RBso
that6321DTthat
data6322NNdata
is6323VBZbe
going6324VVGgo
to6325TOto
be6326VBbe
more6327RBRmore
suspect6328JJsuspect
,6329,,
more6330RBRmore
prone6331JJprone
to6332TOto
cross6333VVcross
...6334:...
to6335TOto
less6336JJRless
reliability6337NNreliability
,6338,,
and6339CCand
less6340RBRless
accurate6341JJaccurate
.6342SENT.
And6343CCand
so6344RBso
,6345,,
if6346INif
the6347DTthe
bureau6348NNbureau
...6349:...
if6350INif
the6351DTthe
Department6352NPDepartment
of6353INof
Justice6354NPJustice
refused6355VVDrefuse
to6356TOto
listen6357VVlisten
to6358TOto
that6359DTthat
,6360,,
how6361WRBhow
can6362MDcan
the6363DTthe
Secretary6364NPSecretary
conclude6365VVPconclude
that6366IN/thatthat
he6367PPhe
's6368VBZbe
complying6369VVGcomply
with6370INwith
66371CD6
(6372((
c6373LSc
)6374))
fully6375RBfully
?6376SENT?
Because6377INbecause
it6378PPit
says6379VVZsay
to6380TOto
the6381DTthe
maximum6382JJmaximum
extent6383NNextent
possible6384JJpossible
,6385,,
and6386CCand
how6387WRBhow
can6388MDcan
you6389PPyou
be6390VBbe
possible6391JJpossible
if6392INif
you6393PPyou
do6394VVPdo
n't6395RBn't
even6396RBeven
ask6397VVask
why6398WRBwhy
?6399SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6400LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
So6401RBso
...6402:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6403LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
This6404DTthis
seems6405VVZseem
like6406INlike
he6407PPhe
thought6408VVDthink
of6409INof
something6410NNsomething
,6411,,
I6412PPI
want6413VVPwant
to6414TOto
add6415VVadd
a6416DTa
citizenship6417NNcitizenship
question6418NNquestion
,6419,,
I6420PPI
do6421VVPdo
n't6422RBn't
know6423VVknow
why6424WRBwhy
,6425,,
but6426CCbut
this6427DTthis
is6428VBZbe
a6429DTa
solution6430NNsolution
in6431INin
search6432NNsearch
of6433INof
a6434DTa
problem6435NNproblem
.6436SENT.
I6437PPI
've6438VHPhave
got6439VVNget
to6440TOto
find6441VVfind
a6442DTa
problem6443NNproblem
that6444WDTthat
fits6445VVZfit
what6446WPwhat
I6447PPI
want6448VVPwant
to6449TOto
do6450VVdo
.6451SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6452LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
So6453RBso
,6454,,
Your6455PP$your
Honor6456NPHonor
,6457,,
there6458EXthere
's6459VBZbe
a6460DTa
whole6461JJwhole
lot6462NNlot
in6463INin
that6464DTthat
question6465NNquestion
,6466,,
but6467CCbut
I6468PPI
think6469VVPthink
I6470PPI
will6471MDwill
start6472VVstart
with6473INwith
where6474WRBwhere
you6475PPyou
ended6476VVDend
.6477SENT.
And6478CCand
if6479INif
you6480PPyou
really6481RBreally
think6482VVPthink
66483CD6
(6484((
c6485LSc
)6486))
is6487VBZbe
a6488DTa
problem6489NNproblem
,6490,,
then6491RBthen
we6492PPwe
really6493RBreally
cannot6494MDcan
ask6495VVask
the6496DTthe
citizenship6497NNcitizenship
question6498NNquestion
on6499INon
the6500DTthe
American6501NPAmerican
Community6502NPCommunity
Survey6503NPSurvey
since6504INsince
that6505WDTthat
is6506VBZbe
just6507RBjust
as6508RBas
subject6509JJsubject
to6510TOto
66511CD6
(6512((
c6513LSc
)6514))
as6515INas
the6516DTthe
census6517NNcensus
is6518VBZbe
.6519SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6520LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
No6521NPNo
,6522,,
what6523WPwhat
it6524PPit
says6525VVZsay
...6526:...
what6527WPwhat
it6528PPit
says6529VVZsay
is6530VBZbe
to6531TOto
the6532DTthe
maximum6533JJmaximum
extent6534NNextent
possible6535JJpossible
.6536SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6537LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
And6538CCand
here6539RBhere
the6540DTthe
Secretary6541NPSecretary
is6542VBZbe
using6543VVGuse
the6544DTthe
administrative6545JJadministrative
records6546NNSrecord
to6547TOto
the6548DTthe
maximum6549JJmaximum
extent6550NNextent
possible6551JJpossible
because6552INbecause
he6553PPhe
's6554VBZbe
combining6555VVGcombine
them6556PPthem
.6557SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6558LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But6559CCbut
the6560DTthe
ACS6561NPACS
is6562VBZbe
not6563RBnot
the6564DTthe
survey6565NNsurvey
.6566SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6567LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
He6568PPhe
's6569VBZbe
combining6570VVGcombine
them6571PPthem
with6572INwith
the6573DTthe
administrative6574JJadministrative
records6575NNSrecord
and6576CCand
the6577DTthe
self-responses6578NNSself-responses
and6579CCand
using6580VVGuse
administrative6581JJadministrative
records6582NNSrecord
where6583WRBwhere
they6584PPthey
're6585VBPbe
available6586JJavailable
,6587,,
using6588VVGuse
self-responses6589NNSself-responses
at6590INat
986591CD@card@
percent6592NNpercent
accuracy6593NNaccuracy
...6594:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6595LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But6596CCbut
the6597DTthe
problem6598NNproblem
...6599:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6600LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...6601:...
where6602WRBwhere
administrative6603JJadministrative
records6604NNSrecord
are6605VBPbe
not6606RBnot
available6607JJavailable
.6608SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6609LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...6610:...
but6611CCbut
the6612DTthe
problem6613NNproblem
is6614VBZbe
you6615PPyou
can6616MDcan
't6617RB't
confuse6618VVconfuse
the6619DTthe
survey6620NNsurvey
,6621,,
which6622WDTwhich
is6623VBZbe
really6624RBreally
the6625DTthe
question6626NNquestion
of6627INof
66628CD6
(6629((
c6630LSc
)6631))
...6632:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6633LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
No6634NPNo
.6635SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6636LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...6637:...
or6638CCor
the6639DTthe
focus6640NNfocus
.6641SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6642LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
It6643PPit
's6644VBZbe
not6645RBnot
.6646SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6647LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Because6648INbecause
...6649:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6650LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
66651CD6
(6652((
c6653LSc
)6654))
applies6655VVZapply
to6656TOto
all6657DTall
census6658NNcensus
instruments6659NNSinstrument
,6660,,
not6661RBnot
just6662RBjust
the6663DTthe
census6664NNcensus
.6665SENT.
It6666PPit
fully6667RBfully
applies6668VVZapply
to6669TOto
the6670DTthe
American6671NPAmerican
Community6672NPCommunity
Survey6673NPSurvey
.6674SENT.
And6675CCand
it6676PPit
likewise6677RBlikewise
applies6678VVZapply
...6679:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6680LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But6681CCbut
the6682DTthe
ACS6683NPACS
is6684VBZbe
not6685RBnot
used6686VVNuse
...6687:...
the6688DTthe
ACS6689NPACS
is6690VBZbe
not6691RBnot
used6692VVNuse
for6693INfor
the6694DTthe
citizenship6695NNcitizenship
purpose6696NNpurpose
.6697SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6698LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
But6699CCbut
,6700,,
Your6701PP$your
Honor6702NPHonor
,6703,,
your6704PP$your
question6705NNquestion
...6706:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6707LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
You6708PPyou
already6709RBalready
said6710VVDsay
why6711WRBwhy
it6712PPit
was6713VBDbe
n't6714RBn't
.6715SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6716LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...6717:...
your6718PP$your
question6719NNquestion
is6720VBZbe
about6721INabout
66722CD6
(6723((
c6724LSc
)6725))
.6726SENT.
66727CD6
(6728((
c6729LSc
)6730))
applies6731VVZapply
to6732TOto
the6733DTthe
ACS6734NPACS
and6735CCand
it6736PPit
applies6737VVZapply
to6738TOto
the6739DTthe
census6740NNcensus
.6741SENT.
And6742CCand
sex6743NNsex
and6744CCand
age6745NNage
information6746NNinformation
,6747,,
which6748WDTwhich
we6749PPwe
ask6750VVPask
on6751INon
the6752DTthe
census6753NNcensus
,6754,,
is6755VBZbe
also6756RBalso
available6757JJavailable
in6758INin
administrative6759JJadministrative
records6760NNSrecord
.6761SENT.
Indeed6762RBindeed
,6763,,
administrative6764JJadministrative
records6765NNSrecord
are6766VBPbe
more6767RBRmore
accurate6768JJaccurate
with6769INwith
respect6770NNrespect
to6771TOto
sex6772NNsex
and6773CCand
age6774NNage
because6775INbecause
,6776,,
presumably6777RBpresumably
,6778,,
your6779PP$your
birth6780NNbirth
date6781NNdate
and6782CCand
your6783PP$your
sex6784NNsex
do6785VVPdo
n't6786RBn't
change6787VVchange
over6788INover
the6789DTthe
course6790NNcourse
of6791INof
time6792NNtime
,6793,,
whereas6794INwhereas
your6795PP$your
citizenship6796NNcitizenship
status6797NNstatus
does6798VVZdo
.6799SENT.
So6800RBso
,6801,,
if6802INif
you6803PPyou
really6804RBreally
think6805VVPthink
that6806DTthat
66807CD6
(6808((
c6809LSc
)6810))
is6811VBZbe
a6812DTa
problem6813NNproblem
,6814,,
we6815PPwe
can6816MDcan
't6817RB't
ask6818VVask
it6819PPit
on6820INon
the6821DTthe
ACS6822NPACS
and6823CCand
we6824PPwe
can6825MDcan
't6826RB't
ask6827VVask
sex6828NNsex
and6829CCand
age6830NNage
on6831INon
the6832DTthe
census6833NNcensus
,6834,,
so6835RBso
that6836DTthat
's6837VBZbe
why6838WRBwhy
I6839PPI
think6840VVPthink
that6841WDTthat
is6842VBZbe
plainly6843RBplainly
wrong6844JJwrong
.6845SENT.
It6846PPit
really6847RBreally
does6848VVZdo
boil6849VVboil
down6850RPdown
to6851TOto
whether6852INwhether
the6853DTthe
Secretary6854NPSecretary
's6855POS's
judgment6856NNjudgment
here6857RBhere
is6858VBZbe
a6859DTa
reasonable6860JJreasonable
one6861CDone
.6862SENT.
And6863CCand
in6864INin
the6865DTthe
face6866NNface
of6867INof
two6868CDtwo
competing6869VVGcompete
possibilities6870NNSpossibility
,6871,,
either6872CCeither
asking6873VVGask
the6874DTthe
question6875NNquestion
,6876,,
getting6877VVGget
answers6878NNSanswer
for6879INfor
two-thirds6880NNStwo-third
of6881INof
the6882DTthe
people6883NNSpeople
for6884INfor
whom6885WPwhom
no6886DTno
administrative6887JJadministrative
records6888NNSrecord
existed6889VVDexist
,6890,,
at6891INat
percent6892NNpercent
accuracy6893NNaccuracy
,6894,,
or6895CCor
using6896VVGuse
an6897DTan
estimation6898NNestimation
model6899NNmodel
that6900WDTthat
had6901VHDhave
not6902RBnot
yet6903RByet
been6904VBNbe
created6905VVNcreate
and6906CCand
had6907VHDhave
an6908DTan
unknown6909JJunknown
error6910NNerror
rate6911NNrate
,6912,,
the6913DTthe
Secretary6914NPSecretary
reasonably6915RBreasonably
chose6916VVDchoose
to6917TOto
go6918VVgo
...6919:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6920LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But6921CCbut
just6922RBjust
...6923:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]6924LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...6925:...
with6926INwith
the6927DTthe
bird6928NNbird
in6929INin
the6930DTthe
hand6931NNhand
.6932SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6933LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...6934:...
General6935NPGeneral
,6936,,
just6937RBjust
going6938VVGgo
back6939RBback
to6940TOto
Justice6941NPJustice
Kavanaugh6942NPKavanaugh
's6943POS's
simple6944JJsimple
question6945NNquestion
about6946INabout
why6947WRBwhy
the6948DTthe
Secretary6949NPSecretary
thought6950VVDthink
that6951IN/thatthat
there6952EXthere
was6953VBDbe
a6954DTa
need6955NNneed
for6956INfor
this6957DTthis
data6958NNSdatum
,6959,,
and6960CCand
then6961RBthen
part6962NNpart
of6963INof
what6964WPwhat
Justice6965NPJustice
Sotomayor6966NPSotomayor
was6967VBDbe
talking6968VVGtalk
about6969RBabout
was6970VBDbe
that6971IN/thatthat
it6972PPit
did6973VVDdo
really6974RBreally
seem6975VVseem
like6976INlike
the6977DTthe
Secretary6978NPSecretary
was6979VBDbe
shopping6980VVGshop
for6981INfor
a6982DTa
need6983NNneed
.6984SENT.
Goes6985VVZgo
to6986TOto
the6987DTthe
Justice6988NPJustice
Department6989NPDepartment
.6990SENT.
Justice6991NPJustice
Department6992NPDepartment
says6993VVZsay
,6994,,
we6995PPwe
do6996VVPdo
n't6997RBn't
need6998VVneed
anything6999NNanything
.7000SENT.
Goes7001VVZgo
to7002TOto
DHS7003NPDHS
.7004SENT.
DHS7005NPDHS
says7006VVZsay
they7007PPthey
do7008VVPdo
n't7009RBn't
need7010VVneed
anything7011NNanything
.7012SENT.
Goes7013VVZgo
back7014RBback
to7015TOto
the7016DTthe
Justice7017NPJustice
Department7018NPDepartment
,7019,,
makes7020VVZmake
it7021PPit
clear7022JJclear
that7023IN/thatthat
he7024PPhe
's7025VBZbe
going7026VVGgo
to7027TOto
put7028VVput
in7029INin
a7030DTa
call7031NNcall
to7032TOto
the7033DTthe
Attorney7034NPAttorney
General7035NPGeneral
.7036SENT.
Finally7037RBfinally
,7038,,
the7039DTthe
Justice7040NPJustice
Department7041NPDepartment
comes7042VVZcome
back7043RBback
to7044TOto
him7045PPhim
and7046CCand
says7047VVZsay
:7048::
Okay7049JJokay
,7050,,
we7051PPwe
can7052MDcan
give7053VVgive
you7054PPyou
what7055WPwhat
you7056PPyou
want7057VVPwant
.7058SENT.
So7059RBso
you7060PPyou
can7061MDcan
't7062RB't
read7063VVDread
this7064DTthis
record7065NNrecord
without7066INwithout
sensing7067VVGsense
that7068IN/thatthat
this7069DTthis
...7070:...
this7071DTthis
need7072NNneed
is7073VBZbe
a7074DTa
contrived7075JJcontrived
one7076CDone
.7077SENT.
Nobody7078NNnobody
had7079VHDhave
...7080:...
there7081EXthere
have7082VHPhave
been7083VBNbe
lots7084NNSlot
of7085INof
assistant7086JJassistant
attorney7087NNattorney
general7088NNgeneral
in7089INin
the7090DTthe
Civil7091NPCivil
Rights7092NPSRights
Division7093NPDivision
that7094WDTthat
have7095VHPhave
never7096RBnever
made7097VVNmake
a7098DTa
plea7099NNplea
for7100INfor
this7101DTthis
kind7102NNkind
of7103INof
data7104NNSdatum
.7105SENT.
And7106CCand
...7107:...
and7108CCand
just7109RBjust
the7110DTthe
way7111NNway
this7112DTthis
went7113VVDgo
back7114RBback
and7115CCand
forth7116RBforth
,7117,,
I7118PPI
guess7119VVPguess
I7120PPI
'd7121MDwould
like7122VVlike
an7123DTan
answer7124NNanswer
to7125TOto
that7126DTthat
simple7127NNsimple
...7128:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]7129LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Yeah7130NPYeah
.7131SENT.
Sure7132JJsure
.7133SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7134LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...7135:...
question7136NNquestion
.7137SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]7138LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
And7139CCand
I7140PPI
have7141VHPhave
two7142CDtwo
responses7143NNSresponse
,7144,,
Your7145PP$your
Honor7146NPHonor
.7147SENT.
And7148CCand
then7149RBthen
,7150,,
if7151INif
I7152PPI
may7153MDmay
,7154,,
I7155PPI
'd7156MDwould
like7157VVlike
to7158TOto
reserve7159VVreserve
the7160DTthe
remainder7161NNremainder
of7162INof
my7163PP$my
time7164NNtime
for7165INfor
rebuttal7166NNrebuttal
.7167SENT.
First7168RBfirst
,7169,,
I7170PPI
think7171VVPthink
it7172PPit
is7173VBZbe
quite7174RBquite
common7175JJcommon
for7176INfor
cabinet7177NNcabinet
Secretaries7178NNSsecretary
to7179TOto
come7180VVcome
into7181INinto
office7182NNoffice
with7183INwith
ideas7184NNSidea
and7185CCand
inclinations7186NNSinclination
to7187TOto
discuss7188VVdiscuss
with7189INwith
their7190PP$their
staff7191NNstaff
and7192CCand
discuss7193VVdiscuss
with7194INwith
their7195PP$their
colleagues7196NNScolleague
whether7197INwhether
there7198EXthere
is7199VBZbe
a7200DTa
legal7201JJlegal
and7202CCand
policy7203NNpolicy
basis7204NNbasis
for7205INfor
that7206DTthat
inclination7207NNinclination
.7208SENT.
Secondly7209RBsecondly
,7210,,
there7211EXthere
's7212VBZbe
no7213DTno
evidence7214NNevidence
in7215INin
this7216DTthis
record7217NNrecord
that7218IN/thatthat
the7219DTthe
Secretary7220NPSecretary
would7221MDwould
have7222VHhave
asked7223VVNask
this7224DTthis
question7225NNquestion
had7226VHDhave
the7227DTthe
Department7228NPDepartment
of7229INof
Justice7230NPJustice
not7231RBnot
requested7232VVDrequest
it7233PPit
.7234SENT.
And7235CCand
there7236EXthere
's7237VBZbe
no7238DTno
evidence7239NNevidence
in7240INin
this7241DTthis
record7242NNrecord
that7243IN/thatthat
the7244DTthe
Secretary7245NPSecretary
did7246VVDdo
n't7247RBn't
believe7248VVbelieve
that7249IN/thatthat
the7250DTthe
Department7251NPDepartment
of7252INof
Justice7253NPJustice
actually7254RBactually
wanted7255VVDwant
this7256DTthis
information7257NNinformation
to7258TOto
improve7259VVimprove
Voting7260NPVoting
Rights7261NPSRights
Act7262NPAct
enforcement7263NNenforcement
.7264SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7265LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank7266VVthank
you7267PPyou
,7268,,
General7269NPGeneral
.7270SENT.
General7271NPGeneral
Underwood7272NPUnderwood
.7273SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]7274LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Mr7275NPMr
.7276SENT.
Chief7277NPChief
Justice7278NPJustice
,7279,,
and7280CCand
may7281MDmay
it7282PPit
please7283VVplease
the7284DTthe
Court7285NPCourt
:7286::
The7287DTthe
Secretary7288NPSecretary
decided7289VVDdecide
to7290TOto
add7291VVadd
this7292DTthis
question7293NNquestion
about7294INabout
citizenship7295NNcitizenship
to7296TOto
the7297DTthe
20207298CD@card@
census7299NNcensus
although7300INalthough
the7301DTthe
record7302NNrecord
before7303INbefore
him7304PPhim
contained7305VVDcontain
uncontradicted7306JJuncontradicted
and7307CCand
strong7308JJstrong
evidence7309NNevidence
that7310IN/thatthat
it7311PPit
will7312MDwill
cause7313VVcause
a7314DTa
decline7315NNdecline
in7316INin
the7317DTthe
response7318NNresponse
rate7319NNrate
of7320INof
non-citizens7321NNSnon-citizens
and7322CCand
Hispanics7323NNSHispanic
,7324,,
to7325TOto
the7326DTthe
detriment7327NNdetriment
of7328INof
the7329DTthe
states7330NNSstate
and7331CCand
localities7332NNSlocality
where7333WRBwhere
they7334PPthey
live7335VVPlive
.7336SENT.
He7337PPhe
gave7338VVDgive
three7339CDthree
reasons7340NNSreason
for7341INfor
the7342DTthe
decision7343NNdecision
,7344,,
and7345CCand
none7346NNnone
of7347INof
them7348PPthem
can7349MDcan
survive7350VVsurvive
APA7351NPAPA
review7352NNreview
.7353SENT.
One7354CDOne
,7355,,
he7356PPhe
said7357VVDsay
there7358EXthere
was7359VBDbe
inadequate7360JJinadequate
evidence7361NNevidence
of7362INof
an7363DTan
effect7364NNeffect
on7365INon
the7366DTthe
response7367NNresponse
rate7368NNrate
.7369SENT.
But7370CCbut
that7371DTthat
is7372VBZbe
flatly7373RBflatly
contrary7374JJcontrary
to7375TOto
the7376DTthe
record7377NNrecord
.7378SENT.
He7379PPhe
said7380VVDsay
he7381PPhe
could7382MDcould
dismiss7383VVdismiss
or7384CCor
discount7385VVdiscount
any7386DTany
such7387JJsuch
effect7388NNeffect
because7389INbecause
non-response7390NNnon-response
is7391VBZbe
an7392DTan
illegal7393JJillegal
act7394NNact
.7395SENT.
But7396CCbut
that7397DTthat
is7398VBZbe
an7399DTan
irrational7400JJirrational
and7401CCand
impermissible7402JJimpermissible
factor7403NNfactor
to7404TOto
consider7405VVconsider
on7406INon
this7407DTthis
question7408NNquestion
.7409SENT.
And7410CCand
he7411PPhe
said7412VVDsay
that7413IN/thatthat
adding7414VVGadd
the7415DTthe
question7416NNquestion
would7417MDwould
help7418VVhelp
voting7419NNvoting
rights7420NNSright
enforcement7421NNenforcement
.7422SENT.
But7423CCbut
that7424DTthat
claim7425NNclaim
is7426VBZbe
unsupported7427JJunsupported
by7428INby
the7429DTthe
record7430NNrecord
as7431INas
well7432RBwell
.7433SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7434LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Do7435VVPdo
you7436PPyou
...7437:...
do7438VVPdo
you7439PPyou
think7440VVPthink
it7441PPit
would7442MDwould
n't7443RBn't
help7444VVhelp
voting7445NNvoting
rights7446NNSright
enforcement7447NNenforcement
?7448SENT?
The7449DTthe
CVAP7450NPCVAP
,7451,,
Citizen7452NPCitizen
Voting7453NPVoting
Age7454NPAge
Population7455NPPopulation
,7456,,
is7457VBZbe
the7458DTthe
critical7459JJcritical
element7460NNelement
in7461INin
voting7462NNvoting
rights7463NNSright
enforcement7464NNenforcement
,7465,,
and7466CCand
this7467DTthis
is7468VBZbe
getting7469VVGget
citizen7470NNcitizen
information7471NNinformation
.7472SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]7473LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well7474UHWell
,7475,,
as7476INas
we7477PPwe
have7478VHPhave
...7479:...
as7480RBas
has7481VHZhave
been7482VBNbe
discussed7483VVNdiscuss
at7484INat
length7485NNlength
in7486INin
the7487DTthe
...7488:...
during7489INduring
the7490DTthe
previous7491JJprevious
argument7492NNargument
,7493,,
the7494DTthe
evidence7495NNevidence
before7496INbefore
him7497PPhim
was7498VBDbe
that7499IN/thatthat
it7500PPit
would7501MDwould
not7502RBnot
give7503VVgive
better7504JJRgood
citizenship7505NNcitizenship
information7506NNinformation
than7507INthan
...7508:...
that7509IN/thatthat
it7510PPit
's7511VBZbe
the7512DTthe
227513CD@card@
million7514CDmillion
that7515IN/thatthat
the7516DTthe
government7517NNgovernment
points7518VVZpoint
to7519TOto
,7520,,
the7521DTthe
227522CD@card@
million7523CDmillion
whose7524WP$whose
citizenship7525NNcitizenship
information7526NNinformation
will7527MDwill
be7528VBbe
either7529RBeither
modeled7530VVNmodel
or7531CCor
the7532DTthe
result7533NNresult
of7534INof
the7535DTthe
answer7536NNanswer
to7537TOto
a7538DTa
census7539NNcensus
question7540NNquestion
.7541SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]7542LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Was7543VBDbe
there7544RBthere
anything7545NNanything
that7546WDTthat
showed7547VVDshow
that7548IN/thatthat
the7549DTthe
Department7550NPDepartment
would7551MDwould
have7552VHhave
been7553VBNbe
aided7554VVNaid
in7555INin
either7556DTeither
past7557JJpast
cases7558NNScase
or7559CCor
cases7560NNScase
on7561INon
the7562DTthe
drawing7563NNdrawing
board7564NNboard
?7565SENT?
Any7566DTany
case7567NNcase
?7568SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]7569LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
There7570EXthere
was7571VBDbe
not7572RBnot
.7573SENT.
And7574CCand
what7575WPwhat
I7576PPI
'd7577MDwould
like7578VVlike
to7579TOto
point7580VVpoint
out7581RPout
is7582VBZbe
that7583IN/thatthat
the7584DTthe
comparison7585NNcomparison
should7586MDshould
be7587VBbe
to7588TOto
using7589VVGuse
administrative7590JJadministrative
records7591NNSrecord
.7592SENT.
27593LS2
The7594DTthe
Department7595NPDepartment
of7596INof
Justice7597NPJustice
letter7598NNletter
,7599,,
taken7600VVNtake
at7601INat
face7602NNface
value7603NNvalue
,7604,,
says7605VVZsay
the7606DTthe
old7607JJold
ACS7608NPACS
survey7609NNsurvey
data7610NNSdatum
that7611IN/thatthat
we7612PPwe
've7613VHPhave
been7614VBNbe
using7615VVGuse
is7616VBZbe
inadequate7617JJinadequate
and7618CCand
we7619PPwe
need7620VVPneed
an7621DTan
improvement7622NNimprovement
over7623INover
that7624DTthat
.7625SENT.
The7626DTthe
Census7627NPCensus
Bureau7628NPBureau
produced7629VVDproduce
this7630DTthis
answer7631NNanswer
,7632,,
which7633WDTwhich
is7634VBZbe
we7635PPwe
can7636MDcan
do7637VVdo
this7638DTthis
by7639INby
linking7640VVGlink
the7641DTthe
existing7642JJexisting
census7643NNcensus
information7644NNinformation
to7645TOto
administrative7646JJadministrative
records7647NNSrecord
.7648SENT.
The7649DTthe
Department7650NPDepartment
of7651INof
Justice7652NPJustice
never7653RBnever
commented7654VVDcomment
on7655INon
that7656DTthat
.7657SENT.
The7658DTthe
Department7659NPDepartment
of7660INof
Justice7661NPJustice
actually7662RBactually
declined7663VVDdecline
to7664TOto
meet7665VVmeet
with7666INwith
the7667DTthe
Census7668NPCensus
Bureau7669NPBureau
people7670NNSpeople
who7671WPwho
wanted7672VVDwant
to7673TOto
meet7674VVmeet
about7675INabout
it7676PPit
.7677SENT.
So7678RBso
there7679EXthere
was7680VBDbe
nothing7681NNnothing
before7682INbefore
the7683DTthe
Secretary7684NPSecretary
to7685TOto
say7686VVsay
that7687IN/thatthat
this7688DTthis
survey7689NNsurvey
...7690:...
this7691DTthis
census7692NNcensus
information7693NNinformation
would7694MDwould
be7695VBbe
an7696DTan
improvement7697NNimprovement
...7698:...
there7699EXthere
was7700VBDbe
no7701DTno
comparison7702NNcomparison
at7703INat
all7704DTall
from7705INfrom
the7706DTthe
Department7707NPDepartment
of7708INof
Justice7709NPJustice
about7710RBabout
whether7711INwhether
this7712DTthis
would7713MDwould
be7714VBbe
an7715DTan
improvement7716NNimprovement
or7717CCor
not7718RBnot
.7719SENT.
It7720PPit
seems7721VVZseem
to7722TOto
me7723PPme
that7724IN/thatthat
at7725INat
least7726JJSleast
with7727INwith
so7728RBso
much7729JJmuch
question7730NNquestion
about7731RBabout
whether7732INwhether
this7733DTthis
information7734NNinformation
would7735MDwould
be7736VBbe
better7737JJRgood
or7738CCor
worse7739JJRbad
than7740INthan
the7741DTthe
...7742:...
the7743DTthe
use7744NNuse
of7745INof
modeling7746VVGmodel
from7747INfrom
administrative7748JJadministrative
records7749NNSrecord
,7750,,
the7751DTthe
Secretary7752NPSecretary
had7753VHDhave
an7754DTan
obligation7755NNobligation
to7756TOto
find7757VVfind
out7758RPout
the7759DTthe
answer7760NNanswer
to7761TOto
that7762DTthat
question7763NNquestion
.7764SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7765LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
What7766WPWhat
if7767INif
the7768DTthe
answer7769NNanswer
was7770VBDbe
uncertain7771JJuncertain
?7772SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]7773LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well7774UHWell
,7775,,
if7776INif
the7777DTthe
answer7778NNanswer
is7779VBZbe
uncertain7780JJuncertain
,7781,,
then7782RBthen
it7783PPit
is7784VBZbe
hard7785JJhard
to7786TOto
invoke7787VVinvoke
that7788IN/thatthat
as7789INas
a7790DTa
reason7791NNreason
.7792SENT.
Now7793RBnow
we7794PPwe
get7795VVPget
back7796RBback
to7797TOto
the7798DTthe
cost7799NNcost
in7800INin
the7801DTthe
enumeration7802NNenumeration
.7803SENT.
That7804DTthat
is7805VBZbe
,7806,,
if7807INif
the7808DTthe
...7809:...
if7810INif
it7811PPit
's7812VBZbe
unclear7813JJunclear
...7814:...
we7815PPwe
think7816VVPthink
it7817PPit
's7818VBZbe
worse7819JJRbad
.7820SENT.
But7821CCbut
,7822,,
if7823INif
it7824PPit
's7825VBZbe
just7826RBjust
unclear7827JJunclear
whether7828INwhether
this7829DTthis
question7830NNquestion
will7831MDwill
improve7832VVimprove
voting7833NNvoting
rights7834NNSright
enforcement7835NNenforcement
,7836,,
that7837WDTthat
is7838VBZbe
not7839RBnot
sufficient7840JJsufficient
to7841TOto
pay7842VVpay
the7843DTthe
cost7844NNcost
of7845INof
the7846DTthe
steep7847JJsteep
decline7848NNdecline
in7849INin
the7850DTthe
enumeration7851NNenumeration
because7852INbecause
the7853DTthe
enumeration7854NNenumeration
is7855VBZbe
,7856,,
after7857INafter
all7858DTall
,7859,,
the7860DTthe
primary7861JJprimary
purpose7862NNpurpose
of7863INof
the7864DTthe
census7865NNcensus
.7866SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]7867LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well7868UHWell
,7869,,
on7870INon
the7871DTthe
modeling7872NNmodeling
...7873:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7874LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well7875UHWell
,7876,,
is7877VBZbe
that7878DTthat
...7879:...
go7880VVgo
ahead7881RBahead
.7882SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]7883LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
On7884INon
the7885DTthe
modeling7886NNmodeling
,7887,,
there7888EXthere
was7889VBDbe
a7890DTa
lot7891NNlot
of7892INof
talk7893NNtalk
during7894INduring
the7895DTthe
first7896JJfirst
part7897NNpart
of7898INof
the7899DTthe
argument7900NNargument
about7901RBabout
...7902:...
I7903PPI
think7904VVPthink
it7905PPit
's7906VBZbe
227907CD@card@
.7908SENT.
67909CD6
million7910CDmillion
people7911NNSpeople
who7912WPwho
it7913PPit
would7914MDwould
...7915:...
it7916PPit
is7917VBZbe
predicted7918VVNpredict
would7919MDwould
answer7920VVanswer
the7921DTthe
citizenship7922NNcitizenship
question7923NNquestion
and7924CCand
as7925INas
to7926TOto
whom7927WPwhom
there7928RBthere
is7929VBZbe
not7930RBnot
administrative7931JJadministrative
data7932NNSdatum
.7933SENT.
And7934CCand
there7935EXthere
was7936VBDbe
an7937DTan
estimate7938NNestimate
that7939IN/thatthat
those7940DTthose
answers7941NNSanswer
would7942MDwould
be7943VBbe
987944CD@card@
percent7945NNpercent
accurate7946JJaccurate
.7947SENT.
And7948CCand
the7949DTthe
comparison7950NNcomparison
then7951RBthen
has7952VHZhave
to7953TOto
be7954VBbe
between7955INbetween
that7956DTthat
percent7957NNpercent
predicted7958VVDpredict
accuracy7959NNaccuracy
rate7960NNrate
and7961CCand
whatever7962WDTwhatever
the7963DTthe
accuracy7964NNaccuracy
rate7965NNrate
would7966MDwould
be7967VBbe
for7968INfor
the7969DTthe
model7970NNmodel
.7971SENT.
And7972CCand
is7973VBZbe
there7974RBthere
anything7975NNanything
in7976INin
the7977DTthe
administrative7978JJadministrative
record7979NNrecord
that7980WDTthat
shows7981VVZshow
that7982IN/thatthat
the7983DTthe
model7984NNmodel
was7985VBDbe
tested7986VVNtest
and7987CCand
that7988IN/thatthat
it7989PPit
was7990VBDbe
possible7991JJpossible
to7992TOto
extract7993VVextract
a7994DTa
...7995:...
a7996DTa
predicted7997VVNpredict
error7998NNerror
rate7999NNrate
for8000INfor
the8001DTthe
model8002NNmodel
?8003SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8004LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
What8005WPWhat
we8006PPwe
have8007VHPhave
...8008:...
what8009WPwhat
we8010PPwe
have8011VHPhave
is8012VBZbe
that8013IN/thatthat
this8014DTthis
...8015:...
the8016DTthe
model8017NNmodel
had8018VHDhave
n't8019RBn't
been8020VBNbe
generated8021VVNgenerate
,8022,,
but8023CCbut
what8024WPwhat
we8025PPwe
have8026VHPhave
is8027VBZbe
the8028DTthe
Census8029NPCensus
Bureau8030NPBureau
saying8031VVGsay
this8032DTthis
is8033VBZbe
like8034INlike
other8035JJother
modeling8036NNmodeling
that8037IN/thatthat
we8038PPwe
routinely8039RBroutinely
do8040VVPdo
.8041SENT.
We8042PPwe
're8043VBPbe
confident8044JJconfident
that8045IN/thatthat
we8046PPwe
can8047MDcan
do8048VVdo
it8049PPit
.8050SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]8051LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
So8052RBso
,8053,,
if8054INif
the8055DTthe
Secretary8056NPSecretary
said8057VVDsay
...8058:...
has8059VHZhave
to8060TOto
choose8061VVchoose
between8062INbetween
two8063CDtwo
things8064NNSthing
,8065,,
and8066CCand
,8067,,
on8068INon
one8069CDone
,8070,,
the8071DTthe
Secretary8072NPSecretary
knows8073VVZknow
there8074EXthere
's8075VBZbe
a8076DTa
percent8077NNpercent
accuracy8078NNaccuracy
rate8079NNrate
,8080,,
and8081CCand
as8082RBas
to8083TOto
the8084DTthe
other8085JJother
,8086,,
the8087DTthe
Census8088NPCensus
Bureau8089NPBureau
says8090VVZsay
,8091,,
we8092PPwe
're8093VBPbe
going8094VVGgo
to8095TOto
create8096VVcreate
a8097DTa
model8098NNmodel
,8099,,
and8100CCand
we8101PPwe
do8102VVPdo
n't8103RBn't
know8104VVknow
how8105WRBhow
...8106:...
we8107PPwe
can8108MDcan
't8109RB't
give8110VVgive
you8111PPyou
any8112DTany
statistics8113NNSstatistic
,8114,,
but8115CCbut
trust8116VVtrust
us8117PPus
,8118,,
it8119PPit
's8120VBZbe
going8121VVGgo
to8122TOto
be8123VBbe
more8124RBRmore
accurate8125JJaccurate
than8126INthan
988127CD@card@
percent8128NNpercent
,8129,,
is8130VBZbe
it8131PPit
arbitrary8132JJarbitrary
and8133CCand
capricious8134JJcapricious
for8135INfor
the8136DTthe
Secretary8137NPSecretary
to8138TOto
say8139VVsay
,8140,,
I8141PPI
'll8142MDwill
go8143VVgo
with8144INwith
the8145DTthe
988146CD@card@
percent8147NNpercent
because8148INbecause
that8149WDTthat
's8150VBZbe
a8151DTa
known8152JJknown
quantity8153NNquantity
?8154SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8155LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
If8156INif
there8157EXthere
were8158VBDbe
no8159DTno
cost8160NNcost
to8161TOto
the8162DTthe
enumeration8163NNenumeration
,8164,,
that8165WDTthat
would8166MDwould
be8167VBbe
a8168DTa
different8169JJdifferent
question8170NNquestion
.8171SENT.
But8172CCbut
,8173,,
when8174WRBwhen
there8175EXthere
is8176VBZbe
this8177DTthis
much8178JJmuch
uncertainty8179NNuncertainty
,8180,,
then8181RBthen
it8182PPit
is8183VBZbe
arbitrary8184JJarbitrary
and8185CCand
capricious8186JJcapricious
to8187TOto
take8188VVtake
that8189DTthat
kind8190NNkind
of8191INof
risk8192NNrisk
...8193:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]8194LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I8195PPI
do8196VVPdo
n't8197RBn't
understand8198VVunderstand
...8199:...
sorry8200JJsorry
.8201SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8202LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
...8203:...
with8204INwith
the8205DTthe
enumeration8206NNenumeration
.8207SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8208LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I8209PPI
do8210VVPdo
n't8211RBn't
understand8212VVunderstand
uncertainty8213NNuncertainty
.8214SENT.
I8215PPI
thought8216VVDthink
the8217DTthe
988218CD@card@
percent8219NNpercent
...8220:...
of8221INof
course8222NNcourse
,8223,,
it8224PPit
's8225VBZbe
988226CD@card@
percent8227NNpercent
.8228SENT.
Most8229JJSmost
people8230NNSpeople
are8231VBPbe
citizens8232NNScitizen
.8233SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8234LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Right8235NPRight
.8236SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8237LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
The8238DTthe
people8239NNSpeople
who8240WPwho
are8241VBPbe
citizens8242NNScitizen
are8243VBPbe
not8244RBnot
going8245VVGgo
to8246TOto
...8247:...
you8248PPyou
know8249VVPknow
,8250,,
they8251PPthey
'll8252MDwill
say8253VVsay
they8254PPthey
're8255VBPbe
citizens8256NNScitizen
.8257SENT.
All8258RBall
you8259PPyou
'd8260MDwould
ever8261RBever
expect8262VVexpect
are8263VBPbe
a8264DTa
few8265JJfew
percent8266NNpercent
who8267WPwho
are8268VBPbe
not8269RBnot
citizens8270NNScitizen
.8271SENT.
Then8272RBthen
I8273PPI
have8274VHPhave
on8275INon
pages8276NNSpage
J8277NNJ
...8278:...
Joint8279JJjoint
Appendix8280NPAppendix
8828281CD@card@
through8282INthrough
8848283CD@card@
Mr8284NNMr
.8285SENT.
Abowd8286NNAbowd
's8287POS's
testimony8288NNtestimony
,8289,,
where8290WRBwhere
he8291PPhe
unequivocally8292RBunequivocally
says8293VVZsay
three8294CDthree
times8295NNStime
that8296IN/thatthat
in8297INin
...8298:...
in8299INin
...8300:...
not8301RBnot
988302CD@card@
percent8303NNpercent
...8304:...
in8305INin
respect8306NNrespect
to8307TOto
those8308DTthose
people8309NNSpeople
who8310WPwho
are8311VBPbe
not8312RBnot
citizens8313NNScitizen
,8314,,
the8315DTthe
administrative8316JJadministrative
model8317NNmodel
will8318MDwill
be8319VBbe
more8320RBRmore
accurate8321JJaccurate
than8322INthan
just8323RBjust
asking8324VVGask
the8325DTthe
census8326NNcensus
question8327NNquestion
,8328,,
and8329CCand
,8330,,
if8331INif
you8332PPyou
add8333VVPadd
the8334DTthe
census8335NNcensus
question8336NNquestion
,8337,,
then8338RBthen
you8339PPyou
look8340VVPlook
to8341TOto
it8342PPit
for8343INfor
the8344DTthe
answer8345NNanswer
,8346,,
you8347PPyou
will8348MDwill
discover8349VVdiscover
that8350IN/thatthat
you8351PPyou
are8352VBPbe
less8353RBRless
accurate8354JJaccurate
in8355INin
respect8356NNrespect
to8357TOto
non-citizens8358NNSnon-citizens
.8359SENT.
Now8360RBnow
he8361PPhe
says8362VVZsay
that8363DTthat
.8364SENT.
That8365DTthat
's8366VBZbe
why8367WRBwhy
I8368PPI
asked8369VVDask
the8370DTthe
Solicitor8371NPSolicitor
General8372NPGeneral
what8373WPwhat
is8374VBZbe
their8375PP$their
contrary8376NNcontrary
to8377TOto
that8378DTthat
,8379,,
and8380CCand
he8381PPhe
gave8382VVDgive
me8383PPme
things8384NNSthing
to8385TOto
look8386VVlook
at8387INat
.8388SENT.
And8389CCand
I8390PPI
would8391MDwould
say8392VVsay
the8393DTthe
most8394RBSmost
contrary8395JJcontrary
thing8396NNthing
,8397,,
which8398WDTwhich
I8399PPI
want8400VVPwant
to8401TOto
ask8402VVask
you8403PPyou
about8404RBabout
,8405,,
is8406VBZbe
Dr8407NNDr
.8408SENT.
Abowd8409RBAbowd
,8410,,
at8411INat
the8412DTthe
trial8413NNtrial
,8414,,
said8415VVDsay
,8416,,
"8417``"
There8418EXthere
's8419VBZbe
no8420DTno
credible8421JJcredible
quantitative8422JJquantitative
evidence8423NNevidence
that8424IN/thatthat
the8425DTthe
addition8426NNaddition
of8427INof
a8428DTa
citizenship8429NNcitizenship
question8430NNquestion
will8431MDwill
affect8432VVaffect
the8433DTthe
accuracy8434NNaccuracy
of8435INof
the8436DTthe
count8437NNcount
.8438SENT.
"8439''"
All8440DTall
right8441NNright
?8442SENT?
That8443DTthat
's8444VBZbe
what8445WPwhat
he8446PPhe
said8447VVDsay
.8448SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8449LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Yes8450NPYes
.8451SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8452LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Now8453RBnow
I8454PPI
'm8455VBPbe
sure8456JJsure
in8457INin
their8458PP$their
reply8459NNreply
brief8460NNbrief
they8461PPthey
pointed8462VVDpoint
right8463RBright
to8464TOto
that8465DTthat
.8466SENT.
You8467PPyou
can8468MDcan
't8469RB't
simply8470RBsimply
ignore8471VVignore
it8472PPit
.8473SENT.
And8474CCand
so8475RBso
I8476PPI
want8477VVPwant
to8478TOto
hear8479VVhear
what8480WPwhat
your8481PP$your
answer8482NNanswer
is8483VBZbe
to8484TOto
that8485WDTthat
,8486,,
which8487WDTwhich
the8488DTthe
government8489NNgovernment
says8490VVZsay
is8491VBZbe
contrary8492JJcontrary
evidence8493NNevidence
.8494SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8495LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
If8496INif
you8497PPyou
look8498VVPlook
at8499INat
that8500DTthat
testimony8501NNtestimony
in8502INin
context8503NNcontext
,8504,,
it8505PPit
is8506VBZbe
perfectly8507RBperfectly
clear8508JJclear
that8509IN/thatthat
what8510WPwhat
he8511PPhe
is8512VBZbe
saying8513VVGsay
is8514VBZbe
that8515IN/thatthat
he8516PPhe
did8517VVDdo
n't8518RBn't
have8519VHhave
enough8520JJenough
evidence8521NNevidence
for8522INfor
a8523DTa
firm8524JJfirm
quantitative8525JJquantitative
statement8526NNstatement
,8527,,
meeting8528VVGmeet
scientific8529JJscientific
standards8530NNSstandard
.8531SENT.
He8532PPhe
actually8533RBactually
defined8534VVDdefine
the8535DTthe
term8536NNterm
"8537``"
credible8538JJcredible
quantitative8539JJquantitative
evidence8540NNevidence
.8541SENT.
"8542''"
And8543CCand
if8544INif
you8545PPyou
'll8546MDwill
bear8547VVbear
with8548INwith
me8549PPme
,8550,,
he8551PPhe
...8552:...
he8553PPhe
said8554VVDsay
it8555PPit
's8556VBZbe
evidence8557NNevidence
that8558WDTthat
is8559VBZbe
specifically8560RBspecifically
related8561VVNrelate
to8562TOto
the8563DTthe
insertion8564NNinsertion
of8565INof
a8566DTa
citizenship8567NNcitizenship
question8568NNquestion
into8569INinto
the8570DTthe
otherwise8571RBotherwise
planned8572VVNplan
20208573CD@card@
census8574NNcensus
that8575WDTthat
identifies8576VVZidentify
the8577DTthe
citizenship8578NNcitizenship
question8579VVPquestion
itself8580PPitself
as8581INas
the8582DTthe
likely8583JJlikely
or8584CCor
one8585CDone
of8586INof
the8587DTthe
causal8588JJcausal
elements8589NNSelement
associated8590VVNassociate
with8591INwith
changes8592NNSchange
in8593INin
the8594DTthe
outcomes8595NNSoutcome
and8596CCand
that8597WDTthat
would8598MDwould
stand8599VVstand
up8600RPup
to8601TOto
extensive8602JJextensive
peer8603NNpeer
review8604NNreview
within8605INwithin
the8606DTthe
Census8607NPCensus
Bureau8608NPBureau
and8609CCand
with8610INwith
the8611DTthe
scientific8612JJscientific
community8613NNcommunity
.8614SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]8615LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
That8616DTthat
...8617:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8618LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
And8619CCand
...8620:...
and8621CCand
the8622DTthe
...8623:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]8624LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
...8625:...
that8626WDTthat
's8627VBZbe
the8628DTthe
evidence8629NNevidence
that8630IN/thatthat
he8631PPhe
found8632VVDfind
was8633VBDbe
not8634RBnot
available8635JJavailable
?8636SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8637LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Yes8638NPYes
,8639,,
that8640WDTthat
's8641VBZbe
right8642JJright
.8643SENT.
He8644PPhe
said8645VVDsay
he8646PPhe
did8647VVDdo
n't8648RBn't
have8649VHhave
enough8650JJenough
to8651TOto
quantify8652VVquantify
accord8653NNaccord
...8654:...
in8655INin
accordance8656NNaccordance
with8657INwith
peer-reviewed8658JJpeer-reviewed
standards8659NNSstandard
.8660SENT.
He8661PPhe
did8662VVDdo
n't8663RBn't
say8664VVsay
there8665EXthere
would8666MDwould
be8667VBbe
no8668DTno
effect8669NNeffect
.8670SENT.
He8671PPhe
said8672VVDsay
,8673,,
I8674PPI
do8675VVPdo
n't8676RBn't
have8677VHhave
enough8678JJenough
to8679TOto
give8680VVgive
what8681WPwhat
I8682PPI
...8683:...
what8684WPwhat
I8685PPI
believe8686VVPbelieve
as8687INas
a8688DTa
scientist8689NNscientist
to8690TOto
be8691VBbe
this8692DTthis
term8693NNterm
,8694,,
"8695''"
credible8696JJcredible
quantitative8697JJquantitative
"8698''"
...8699:...
to8700TOto
make8701VVmake
credible8702JJcredible
quantitative8703JJquantitative
evidence8704NNevidence
.8705SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8706LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Can8707MDcan
...8708:...
can8709MDcan
I8710PPI
ask8711VVask
...8712:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8713LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
So8714INso
he8715PPhe
is8716VBZbe
...8717:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8718LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I8719PPI
'm8720VBPbe
sorry8721JJsorry
,8722,,
please8723VVplease
finish8724NNfinish
.8725SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8726LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
And8727CCand
...8728:...
and8729CCand
my8730PP$my
point8731NNpoint
is8732VBZbe
that8733IN/thatthat
,8734,,
at8735INat
the8736DTthe
same8737JJsame
trial8738NNtrial
,8739,,
if8740INif
we8741PPwe
're8742VBPbe
going8743VVGgo
to8744TOto
look8745VVlook
at8746INat
the8747DTthe
trial8748NNtrial
testimony8749NNtestimony
,8750,,
at8751INat
the8752DTthe
same8753JJsame
trial8754NNtrial
,8755,,
other8756JJother
experts8757NNSexpert
said8758VVDsay
:8759::
Maybe8760RBmaybe
so8761RBso
,8762,,
but8763CCbut
there8764EXthere
is8765VBZbe
enough8766RBenough
evidence8767NNevidence
to8768TOto
make8769VVmake
a8770DTa
different8771JJdifferent
kind8772NNkind
of8773INof
judgment8774NNjudgment
,8775,,
not8776RBnot
a8777DTa
firm8778NNfirm
scientific8779JJscientific
,8780,,
quantified8781VVNquantify
judgment8782NNjudgment
,8783,,
but8784CCbut
a8785DTa
judgment8786NNjudgment
.8787SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]8788LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Do8789VVPdo
you8790PPyou
think8791VVPthink
it8792PPit
's8793VBZbe
proper8794JJproper
to8795TOto
look8796VVlook
at8797INat
the8798DTthe
trial8799NNtrial
record8800NNrecord
on8801INon
this8802DTthis
issue8803NNissue
?8804SENT?
There8805EXthere
's8806VBZbe
a8807DTa
lot8808NNlot
of8809INof
citation8810NNcitation
in8811INin
the8812DTthe
Respondents8813NNSrespondent
'8814POS'
brief8815NNbrief
to8816TOto
trial8817NNtrial
testimony8818NNtestimony
.8819SENT.
Are8820VBPbe
n't8821RBn't
we8822PPwe
reviewing8823VVGreview
the8824DTthe
administrative8825JJadministrative
record8826NNrecord
?8827SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8828LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
We8829PPwe
are8830VBPbe
.8831SENT.
Well8832UHwell
,8833,,
as8834RBas
for8835INfor
standing8836NNstanding
,8837,,
we8838PPwe
're8839VBPbe
reviewing8840VVGreview
the8841DTthe
whole8842JJwhole
record8843NNrecord
.8844SENT.
And8845CCand
as8846RBas
...8847:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]8848LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
That8849DTthat
's8850VBZbe
correct8851JJcorrect
.8852SENT.
But8853CCbut
as8854INas
to8855TOto
the8856DTthe
arbitrary8857JJarbitrary
and8858CCand
capricious8859JJcapricious
review8860NNreview
...8861:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8862LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Correct8863JJcorrect
.8864SENT.
That's8865NNSThat's
...8866:...
that8867DTthat
...8868:...
that8869WDTthat
is8870VBZbe
correct8871JJcorrect
,8872,,
but8873CCbut
that8874WDTthat
would8875MDwould
make8876VVmake
this8877DTthis
statement8878NNstatement
also8879RBalso
of8880INof
Dr8881NPDr
.8882SENT.
Abowd8883NNSAbowd
off8884INoff
the8885DTthe
record8886NNrecord
,8887,,
off8888INoff
the8889DTthe
administrative8890JJadministrative
record8891NNrecord
.8892SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8893LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Can8894MDcan
I8895PPI
...8896:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8897LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
But8898CCbut
what8899WPwhat
I8900PPI
...8901:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8902LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...8903:...
can8904MDcan
I8905PPI
ask8906VVask
a8907DTa
...8908:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8909LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Yes8910NPYes
.8911SENT.
Please8912UHPlease
.8913SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8914LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Please8915RBplease
finish8916VVfinish
.8917SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8918LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
No8919NPNo
,8920,,
going8921VVGgo
...8922:...
going8923VVGgo
...8924:...
going8925VVGgo
back8926RBback
to8927TOto
your8928PP$your
question8929NNquestion
...8930:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]8931LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Wait8932VVwait
a8933DTa
minute8934NNminute
,8935,,
Justice8936NPJustice
Kavanaugh8937NPKavanaugh
.8938SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]8939LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
...8940:...
while8941INwhile
I8942PPI
think8943VVPthink
there8944EXthere
is8945VBZbe
good8946JJgood
evidence8947NNevidence
,8948,,
and8949CCand
nothing8950NNnothing
contrary8951NNcontrary
,8952,,
that8953IN/thatthat
this8954DTthis
228955CD@card@
million8956CDmillion
would8957MDwould
be8958VBbe
more8959RBRmore
accurately8960RBaccurately
identified8961VVNidentify
by8962INby
the8963DTthe
modeling8964NNmodeling
than8965INthan
by8966INby
the8967DTthe
census8968NNcensus
,8969,,
I8970PPI
think8971VVPthink
it8972PPit
is8973VBZbe
sufficient8974JJsufficient
for8975INfor
this8976DTthis
purpose8977NNpurpose
to8978TOto
treat8979VVtreat
it8980PPit
as8981INas
somewhat8982RBsomewhat
uncertain8983JJuncertain
,8984,,
because8985INbecause
it8986PPit
is8987VBZbe
uncertainty8988NNuncertainty
with8989INwith
respect8990NNrespect
to8991TOto
the8992DTthe
discretionary8993JJdiscretionary
part8994NNpart
of8995INof
what8996WPwhat
the8997DTthe
Census8998NPCensus
Bureau8999NPBureau
does9000VVZdo
;9001:;
namely9002RBnamely
,9003,,
collect9004VVPcollect
extra9005JJextra
information9006NNinformation
.9007SENT.
The9008DTthe
core9009JJcore
function9010NNfunction
of9011INof
the9012DTthe
census9013NNcensus
,9014,,
not9015RBnot
of9016INof
the9017DTthe
Census9018NPCensus
Bureau9019NPBureau
in9020INin
all9021PDTall
its9022PP$its
actions9023NNSaction
,9024,,
but9025CCbut
of9026INof
...9027:...
on9028INon
the9029DTthe
census9030NNcensus
form9031NNform
...9032:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9033LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But9034CCbut
the9035DTthe
...9036:...
the9037DTthe
United9038NPUnited
Nations9039NPSNations
recommends9040VVZrecommend
that9041IN/thatthat
countries9042NNScountry
ask9043VVPask
a9044DTa
citizenship9045NNcitizenship
question9046NNquestion
on9047INon
the9048DTthe
census9049NNcensus
.9050SENT.
And9051CCand
a9052DTa
number9053NNnumber
of9054INof
other9055JJother
countries9056NNScountry
do9057VVPdo
it9058PPit
.9059SENT.
Spain9060NPSpain
,9061,,
Germany9062NPGermany
,9063,,
Canada9064NPCanada
,9065,,
Australia9066NPAustralia
,9067,,
Ireland9068NPIreland
,9069,,
Mexico9070NPMexico
ask9071VVPask
a9072DTa
citizenship9073NNcitizenship
question9074NNquestion
.9075SENT.
And9076CCand
the9077DTthe
United9078NPUnited
States9079NPSStates
has9080VHZhave
asked9081VVNask
a9082DTa
citizenship9083NNcitizenship
question9084NNquestion
,9085,,
as9086INas
you9087PPyou
know9088VVPknow
,9089,,
in9090INin
one9091CDone
form9092NNform
or9093CCor
another9094DTanother
since9095INsince
18209096CD@card@
,9097,,
excluding9098VVGexclude
18409099CD@card@
,9100,,
and9101CCand
,9102,,
again9103RBagain
,9104,,
long9105JJlong
form9106NNform
at9107INat
times9108NNStime
,9109,,
in9110INin
more9111JJRmore
recent9112JJrecent
times9113NNStime
,9114,,
and9115CCand
then9116RBthen
on9117INon
the9118DTthe
ACS9119NPACS
since9120INsince
20059121CD@card@
.9122SENT.
The9123DTthe
question9124NNquestion
is9125VBZbe
,9126,,
does9127VVZdo
that9128IN/thatthat
international9129JJinternational
practice9130NNpractice
,9131,,
that9132DTthat
U9133NPU
.9134SENT.
N9135NPN
.9136SENT.
recommendation9137NNrecommendation
,9138,,
that9139DTthat
historical9140JJhistorical
practice9141NNpractice
in9142INin
the9143DTthe
United9144NPUnited
States9145NPStates
,9146,,
affect9147VVPaffect
how9148WRBhow
we9149PPwe
should9150MDshould
look9151VVlook
at9152INat
the9153DTthe
inclusion9154NNinclusion
of9155INof
a9156DTa
citizenship9157NNcitizenship
question9158NNquestion
in9159INin
this9160DTthis
case9161NNcase
?9162SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9163LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
The9164DTthe
same9165JJsame
guidance9166NNguidance
from9167INfrom
the9168DTthe
U9169NPU
.9170SENT.
N9171NPN
.9172SENT.
also9173RBalso
says9174VVZsay
to9175TOto
be9176VBbe
careful9177JJcareful
to9178TOto
test9179VVtest
questions9180NNSquestion
to9181TOto
make9182VVmake
sure9183JJsure
they9184PPthey
do9185VVPdo
n't9186RBn't
interfere9187VVinterfere
with9188INwith
the9189DTthe
enumeration9190NNenumeration
.9191SENT.
It9192PPit
says9193VVZsay
you9194PPyou
need9195VVPneed
to9196TOto
make9197VVmake
a9198DTa
judgment9199NNjudgment
in9200INin
context9201NNcontext
.9202SENT.
It9203PPit
may9204MDmay
be9205VBbe
that9206IN/thatthat
those9207DTthose
countries9208NNScountry
either9209RBeither
have9210VHPhave
n't9211RBn't
examined9212VVNexamine
or9213CCor
do9214VVPdo
n't9215RBn't
have9216VHhave
the9217DTthe
problem9218NNproblem
that9219WDTthat
has9220VHZhave
been9221VBNbe
identified9222VVNidentify
...9223:...
the9224DTthe
problem9225NNproblem
of9226INof
depressing9227VVGdepress
the9228DTthe
enumeration9229NNenumeration
that9230IN/thatthat
the9231DTthe
United9232NPUnited
States9233NPSStates
has9234VHZhave
.9235SENT.
It9236PPit
's9237VBZbe
certainly9238RBcertainly
something9239NNsomething
to9240TOto
look9241VVlook
at9242INat
,9243,,
but9244CCbut
...9245:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9246LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But9247CCbut
you9248PPyou
agree9249VVPagree
it9250PPit
's9251VBZbe
very9252RBvery
...9253:...
it9254PPit
's9255VBZbe
a9256DTa
very9257RBvery
common9258JJcommon
question9259NNquestion
internationally9260RBinternationally
?9261SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9262LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well9263UHwell
,9264,,
it9265PPit
is9266VBZbe
certainly9267RBcertainly
useful9268JJuseful
information9269NNinformation
for9270INfor
a9271DTa
country9272NNcountry
to9273TOto
have9274VHhave
.9275SENT.
And9276CCand
I9277PPI
'm9278VBPbe
not9279RBnot
suggesting9280VVGsuggest
at9281INat
all9282PDTall
that9283IN/thatthat
that9284DTthat
information9285NNinformation
should9286MDshould
n't9287RBn't
be9288VBbe
collected9289VVNcollect
.9290SENT.
The9291DTthe
question9292NNquestion
is9293VBZbe
whether9294INwhether
it9295PPit
should9296MDshould
be9297VBbe
collected9298VVNcollect
on9299INon
the9300DTthe
very9301JJvery
instrument9302NNinstrument
that9303WDTthat
is9304VBZbe
...9305:...
whose9306WP$whose
principal9307JJprincipal
function9308NNfunction
is9309VBZbe
to9310TOto
count9311VVcount
the9312DTthe
population9313NNpopulation
,9314,,
when9315WRBwhen
we9316PPwe
have9317VHPhave
such9318JJsuch
strong9319JJstrong
evidence9320NNevidence
that9321IN/thatthat
it9322PPit
will9323MDwill
depress9324VVdepress
that9325DTthat
count9326NNcount
,9327,,
make9328VVmake
it9329PPit
less9330RBRless
accurate9331JJaccurate
,9332,,
and9333CCand
make9334VVmake
it9335PPit
less9336RBRless
accurate9337JJaccurate
in9338INin
a9339DTa
...9340:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9341LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well9342UHWell
,9343,,
the9344DTthe
principal9345JJprincipal
purpose9346NNpurpose
...9347:...
you9348PPyou
're9349VBPbe
...9350:...
you9351PPyou
're9352VBPbe
right9353JJright
,9354,,
the9355DTthe
principal9356JJprincipal
purpose9357NNpurpose
is9358VBZbe
to9359TOto
count9360VVcount
the9361DTthe
population9362NNpopulation
,9363,,
but9364CCbut
we9365PPwe
've9366VHPhave
had9367VHDhave
demographic9368JJdemographic
questions9369NNSquestion
on9370INon
the9371DTthe
census9372NNcensus
...9373:...
I9374PPI
do9375VVPdo
n't9376RBn't
know9377VVknow
how9378WRBhow
far9379RBfar
back9380RBback
,9381,,
but9382CCbut
,9383,,
certainly9384RBcertainly
,9385,,
it9386PPit
's9387VBZbe
quite9388RBquite
common9389JJcommon
.9390SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9391LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
That's9392NPThat's
...9393:...
that9394WDTthat
's9395VBZbe
correct9396JJcorrect
,9397,,
but9398CCbut
we9399PPwe
have9400VHPhave
no9401DTno
evidence9402NNevidence
about9403RBabout
...9404:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9405LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Sex9406NNsex
,9407,,
age9408NNage
,9409,,
things9410NNSthing
like9411INlike
that9412DTthat
.9413SENT.
You9414PPyou
go9415VVPgo
back9416RBback
and9417CCand
it9418PPit
looks9419VVZlook
...9420:...
you9421PPyou
know9422VVPknow
,9423,,
do9424VVPdo
you9425PPyou
...9426:...
do9427VVPdo
you9428PPyou
own9429VVPown
your9430PP$your
house9431NNhouse
?9432SENT?
Do9433VVdo
you9434PPyou
own9435VVown
a9436DTa
radio9437NNradio
?9438SENT?
I9439PPI
mean9440VVPmean
,9441,,
the9442DTthe
questions9443NNSquestion
go9444VVPgo
quite9445RBquite
beyond9446INbeyond
how9447WRBhow
many9448JJmany
people9449NNSpeople
there9450RBthere
are9451VBPbe
.9452SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9453LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well9454UHwell
,9455,,
I9456PPI
'd9457MDwould
like9458VVlike
to9459TOto
say9460VVsay
two9461CDtwo
things9462NNSthing
about9463INabout
that9464DTthat
.9465SENT.
We9466PPwe
have9467VHPhave
no9468DTno
comparable9469JJcomparable
evidence9470NNevidence
about9471INabout
any9472DTany
of9473INof
those9474DTthose
other9475JJother
questions9476NNSquestion
that9477IN/thatthat
they9478PPthey
depress9479VVPdepress
the9480DTthe
count9481NNcount
in9482INin
this9483DTthis
substantial9484JJsubstantial
a9485DTa
way9486NNway
and9487CCand
in9488INin
this9489DTthis
disproportionate9490JJdisproportionate
a9491DTa
way9492NNway
because9493INbecause
,9494,,
as9495INas
this9496DTthis
Court9497NPCourt
said9498VVDsay
in9499INin
Wisconsin9500NPWisconsin
,9501,,
distributive9502JJdistributive
accuracy9503NNaccuracy
is9504VBZbe
even9505RBeven
more9506RBRmore
important9507JJimportant
for9508INfor
the9509DTthe
census9510NNcensus
.9511SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]9512LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well9513UHWell
,9514,,
the9515DTthe
...9516:...
the9517DTthe
...9518:...
the9519DTthe
response9520NNresponse
rate9521NNrate
is9522VBZbe
very9523RBvery
important9524JJimportant
,9525,,
so9526RBso
can9527MDcan
I9528PPI
ask9529VVask
you9530PPyou
a9531DTa
question9532NNquestion
about9533INabout
that9534DTthat
?9535SENT?
A9536DTa
lot9537NNlot
of9538INof
your9539PP$your
argument9540NNargument
and9541CCand
a9542DTa
lot9543NNlot
of9544INof
the9545DTthe
district9546NNdistrict
court9547NNcourt
's9548POS's
argument9549NNargument
seems9550VVZseem
to9551TOto
hinge9552VVhinge
on9553INon
this9554DTthis
prediction9555NNprediction
that9556IN/thatthat
there9557EXthere
will9558MDwill
be9559VBbe
59560CD5
.9561SENT.
19562CD1
percent9563NNpercent
fewer9564JJRfew
responses9565NNSresponse
if9566INif
the9567DTthe
citizenship9568NNcitizenship
question9569NNquestion
is9570VBZbe
included9571VVNinclude
on9572INon
the9573DTthe
census9574NNcensus
.9575SENT.
But9576CCbut
that9577DTthat
seems9578VVZseem
...9579:...
that9580WDTthat
is9581VBZbe
based9582VVNbase
,9583,,
as9584INas
I9585PPI
understand9586VVPunderstand
it9587PPit
,9588,,
on9589INon
the9590DTthe
fact9591NNfact
that9592IN/thatthat
non-citizens9593NNSnon-citizens
are9594VBPbe
somewhat9595RBsomewhat
less9596RBRless
likely9597JJlikely
to9598TOto
complete9599VVcomplete
the9600DTthe
ACS9601NPACS
,9602,,
which9603WDTwhich
includes9604VVZinclude
the9605DTthe
citizenship9606NNcitizenship
question9607NNquestion
,9608,,
than9609INthan
are9610VBPbe
citizens9611NNScitizen
.9612SENT.
Am9613VBPbe
I9614PPI
right9615JJright
in9616INin
understanding9617VVGunderstand
that9618DTthat
?9619SENT?
That9620DTthat
's9621VBZbe
fundamentally9622RBfundamentally
where9623WRBwhere
that9624DTthat
comes9625VVZcome
from9626INfrom
?9627SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9628LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
It9629PPit
's9630VBZbe
not9631RBnot
about9632RBabout
not9633RBnot
completing9634VVGcomplete
.9635SENT.
It9636PPit
's9637VBZbe
about9638RBabout
not9639RBnot
...9640:...
I9641PPI
mean9642VVPmean
,9643,,
it9644PPit
's9645VBZbe
not9646RBnot
about9647RBabout
skipping9648VVGskip
questions9649NNSquestion
on9650INon
a9651DTa
form9652NNform
.9653SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]9654LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Not9655RBnot
...9656:...
not9657RBnot
responding9658VVGrespond
.9659SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9660LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
It9661PPit
's9662VBZbe
about9663RBabout
not9664RBnot
...9665:...
not9666RBnot
responding9667VVGrespond
.9668SENT.
Yes9669UHyes
.9670SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]9671LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
That9672DTthat
's9673VBZbe
correct9674JJcorrect
.9675SENT.
Okay9676JJokay
.9677SENT.
They9678PPthey
're9679VBPbe
somewhat9680RBsomewhat
less9681RBRless
likely9682JJlikely
to9683TOto
respond9684VVrespond
to9685TOto
the9686DTthe
ACS9687NPACS
than9688INthan
are9689NNare
...9690:...
than9691INthan
are9692VBPbe
...9693:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9694LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
It9695PPit
's9696VBZbe
the9697DTthe
ACS9698NPACS
in9699INin
one9700CDone
study9701NNstudy
and9702CCand
the9703DTthe
long9704JJlong
form9705NNform
in9706INin
another9707DTanother
.9708SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]9709LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Okay9710NPOkay
.9711SENT.
But9712CCbut
what9713WPwhat
jumps9714VVZjump
out9715RBout
is9716VBZbe
the9717DTthe
fact9718NNfact
that9719IN/thatthat
citizens9720NNScitizen
and9721CCand
non-citizens9722NNSnon-citizens
differ9723VVPdiffer
in9724INin
a9725DTa
lot9726NNlot
of9727INof
respects9728NNSrespect
other9729JJother
than9730INthan
citizenship9731NNcitizenship
.9732SENT.
They9733PPthey
differ9734VVPdiffer
in9735INin
socioeconomic9736JJsocioeconomic
status9737NNstatus
.9738SENT.
They9739PPthey
differ9740VVPdiffer
in9741INin
education9742NNeducation
.9743SENT.
They9744PPthey
differ9745VVPdiffer
in9746INin
language9747NNlanguage
ability9748NNability
.9749SENT.
So9750RBso
I9751PPI
do9752VVPdo
n't9753RBn't
think9754VVthink
you9755PPyou
have9756VHPhave
to9757TOto
be9758VBbe
much9759JJmuch
of9760INof
a9761DTa
statistician9762NNstatistician
to9763TOto
wonder9764VVwonder
about9765INabout
the9766DTthe
legitimacy9767NNlegitimacy
of9768INof
concluding9769VVGconclude
that9770IN/thatthat
there9771EXthere
's9772VBZbe
going9773VVGgo
to9774TOto
be9775VBbe
a9776DTa
59777CD5
.9778SENT.
19779CD1
percent9780NNpercent
lower9781JJRlow
response9782NNresponse
rate9783NNrate
because9784INbecause
of9785INof
this9786DTthis
one9787CDone
factor9788NNfactor
.9789SENT.
But9790CCbut
maybe9791RBmaybe
there9792EXthere
's9793VBZbe
something9794RBsomething
more9795RBRmore
there9796RBthere
.9797SENT.
So9798RBso
what9799WPwhat
...9800:...
what9801WPwhat
does9802VVZdo
that9803IN/thatthat
analysis9804NNanalysis
miss9805NNmiss
?9806SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9807LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
The9808DTthe
strong9809JJstrong
...9810:...
well9811RBwell
,9812,,
a9813DTa
couple9814NNcouple
of9815INof
things9816NNSthing
.9817SENT.
The9818DTthe
strong9819JJstrong
empirical9820JJempirical
evidence9821NNevidence
that9822WDTthat
is9823VBZbe
the9824DTthe
basis9825NNbasis
for9826INfor
that9827DTthat
judgment9828NNjudgment
,9829,,
which9830WDTwhich
,9831,,
by9832INby
the9833DTthe
way9834NNway
,9835,,
has9836VHZhave
not9837RBnot
been9838VBNbe
contested9839VVNcontest
by9840INby
the9841DTthe
government9842NNgovernment
,9843,,
the9844DTthe
government9845NNgovernment
has9846VHZhave
other9847JJother
things9848NNSthing
to9849TOto
say9850VVsay
but9851CCbut
does9852VVZdo
not9853RBnot
contest9854VVcontest
this9855DTthis
decline9856NNdecline
...9857:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]9858LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
I9859PPI
thought9860VVDthink
they9861PPthey
did9862VVDdo
,9863,,
but9864CCbut
,9865,,
in9866INin
any9867DTany
event9868NNevent
,9869,,
go9870VVgo
ahead9871RBahead
.9872SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]9873LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
I9874PPI
'll9875MDwill
come9876VVcome
back9877RBback
to9878TOto
that9879DTthat
...9880:...
is9881VBZbe
a9882DTa
...9883:...
is9884VBZbe
a9885DTa
retrospective9886JJretrospective
review9887NNreview
of9888INof
comparing9889VVGcompare
in9890INin
one9891CDone
case9892NNcase
for9893INfor
20109894CD@card@
the9895DTthe
short-form9896NNshort-form
census9897NNcensus
and9898CCand
the9899DTthe
ACS9900NPACS
,9901,,
and9902CCand
in9903INin
20009904CD@card@
,9905,,
it9906PPit
was9907VBDbe
to9908TOto
compare9909VVcompare
the9910DTthe
short9911JJshort
form9912NNform
and9913CCand
the9914DTthe
long-form9915NNlong-form
census9916NNcensus
.9917SENT.
It9918PPit
's9919VBZbe
a9920DTa
comparable9921JJcomparable
comparison9922NNcomparison
.9923SENT.
In9924INin
each9925DTeach
case9926NNcase
,9927,,
the9928DTthe
longer9929RBRlonger
one9930PPone
had9931VHDhave
a9932DTa
citizenship9933NNcitizenship
question9934NNquestion
on9935INon
it9936PPit
.9937SENT.
In9938INin
each9939DTeach
case9940NNcase
,9941,,
everyone9942NNeveryone
,9943,,
population9944NNpopulation
groups9945NNSgroup
notwithstanding9946RBnotwithstanding
,9947,,
there9948EXthere
was9949VBDbe
a9950DTa
decline9951NNdecline
from9952INfrom
the9953DTthe
short9954JJshort
form9955NNform
to9956TOto
the9957DTthe
long9958JJlong
form9959NNform
.9960SENT.
But9961CCbut
there9962EXthere
was9963VBDbe
a9964DTa
much9965RBmuch
greater9966JJRgreat
decline9967NNdecline
among9968INamong
Hispanics9969NNSHispanic
and9970CCand
non-citizens9971NNSnon-citizens
.9972SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9973LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
But9974NPBut
,9975,,
counsel9976NNcounsel
,9977,,
is9978VBZbe
n't9979RBn't
...9980:...
does9981VVZdo
n't9982RBn't
Justice9983NPJustice
Alito9984NPAlito
have9985VHPhave
a9986DTa
point9987NNpoint
to9988TOto
the9989DTthe
extent9990NNextent
that9991IN/thatthat
there9992EXthere
could9993MDcould
be9994VBbe
multiple9995JJmultiple
reasons9996NNSreason
why9997WRBwhy
individuals9998NNSindividual
do9999VVPdo
n't10000RBn't
complete10001VVcomplete
the10002DTthe
form10003NNform
?10004SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10005LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well10006UHWell
,10007,,
the10008DTthe
lay10009NNlay
...10010:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10011LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
And10012CCand
we10013PPwe
have10014VHPhave
n't10015RBn't
...10016:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10017LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
I10018PPI
'm10019VBPbe
sorry10020JJsorry
,10021,,
go10022VVgo
ahead10023RBahead
.10024SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10025LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Plenty10026NPPlenty
of10027INof
interrupting10028VVGinterrupt
.10029SENT.
But10030CCbut
we10031PPwe
do10032VVPdo
n't10033RBn't
have10034VHhave
any10035DTany
evidence10036NNevidence
disaggregating10037VVGdisaggregating
the10038DTthe
reasons10039NNSreason
why10040WRBwhy
the10041DTthe
forms10042NNSform
are10043VBPbe
left10044RBleft
uncompleted10045JJuncompleted
.10046SENT.
What10047WPWhat
do10048VVPdo
we10049PPwe
do10050VVPdo
with10051INwith
that10052DTthat
?10053SENT?
I10054PPI
mean10055VVPmean
,10056,,
normally10057RBnormally
,10058,,
we10059PPwe
'd10060MDwould
have10061VHhave
a10062DTa
regression10063NNregression
analysis10064NNanalysis
that10065WDTthat
would10066MDwould
disaggregate10067VVdisaggregate
the10068DTthe
potential10069JJpotential
causes10070NNScause
and10071CCand
identify10072VVidentify
to10073TOto
a10074DTa
95th10075JJ95th
percentile10076NNpercentile
degree10077NNdegree
of10078INof
certainty10079NNcertainty
what10080WPwhat
the10081DTthe
reason10082NNreason
is10083VBZbe
that10084IN/thatthat
persons10085NNSperson
are10086VBPbe
not10087RBnot
filling10088VVGfill
out10089RPout
this10090DTthis
form10091NNform
and10092CCand
we10093PPwe
could10094MDcould
attribute10095VVattribute
it10096PPit
to10097TOto
this10098DTthis
question10099NNquestion
.10100SENT.
We10101PPwe
do10102VVPdo
n't10103RBn't
have10104VHhave
anything10105NNanything
like10106INlike
that10107DTthat
here10108RBhere
.10109SENT.
So10110RBso
what10111WPwhat
are10112VBPbe
we10113PPwe
supposed10114VVNsuppose
to10115TOto
do10116VVdo
about10117INabout
that10118DTthat
?10119SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10120LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well10121UHwell
,10122,,
I10123PPI
think10124VVPthink
...10125:...
I10126PPI
think10127VVPthink
there10128EXthere
are10129VBPbe
a10130DTa
few10131JJfew
things10132NNSthing
to10133TOto
say10134VVsay
.10135SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10136LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
And10137CCand
...10138:...
and10139CCand
...10140:...
and10141CCand
...10142:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10143LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well10144UHWell
...10145:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10146LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...10147:...
and10148CCand
let10149VVlet
me10150PPme
just10151RBjust
throw10152VVPthrow
in10153INin
one10154CDone
other10155JJother
question10156NNquestion
.10157SENT.
I10158PPI
know10159VVPknow
your10160PP$your
light10161NNlight
's10162VBZbe
on10163INon
,10164,,
but10165CCbut
I10166PPI
really10167RBreally
wanted10168VVDwant
to10169TOto
get10170VVget
it10171PPit
to10172TOto
you10173PPyou
and10174CCand
I10175PPI
'm10176VBPbe
sorry10177JJsorry
we10178PPwe
have10179VHPhave
n't10180RBn't
gotten10181VVNget
there10182RBthere
.10183SENT.
And10184CCand
that10185DTthat
is10186VBZbe
,10187,,
what10188WPwhat
do10189VVPdo
we10190PPwe
do10191VVPdo
also10192RBalso
...10193:...
and10194CCand
it10195PPit
's10196VBZbe
totally10197RBtotally
different10198JJdifferent
,10199,,
so10200RBso
I10201PPI
'm10202VBPbe
really10203RBreally
sorry10204RBsorry
...10205:...
what10206WPwhat
do10207VVPdo
we10208PPwe
do10209VVPdo
with10210INwith
the10211DTthe
fact10212NNfact
that10213IN/thatthat
,10214,,
as10215INas
I10216PPI
understand10217VVPunderstand
it10218PPit
,10219,,
some10220DTsome
of10221INof
the10222DTthe
Respondents10223NNSrespondent
and10224CCand
other10225JJother
people10226NNSpeople
in10227INin
litigation10228NNlitigation
have10229VHPhave
complained10230VVNcomplain
when10231WRBwhen
...10232:...
when10233WRBwhen
folks10234NNSfolk
have10235VHPhave
relied10236VVNrely
on10237INon
the10238DTthe
ACS10239NPACS
to10240TOto
extrapolate10241VVextrapolate
citizenship10242NNcitizenship
for10243INfor
purposes10244NNSpurpose
of10245INof
redistricting10246VVGredistrict
and10247CCand
,10248,,
in10249INin
fact10250NNfact
,10251,,
argued10252VVDargue
that10253IN/thatthat
we10254PPwe
should10255MDshould
rely10256VVrely
only10257RBonly
on10258INon
actual10259JJactual
census10260NNcensus
data10261NNSdatum
?10262SENT?
And10263CCand
I10264PPI
understand10265VVPunderstand
Respondents10266NNSrespondent
have10267VHPhave
made10268VVNmake
that10269DTthat
argument10270NNargument
in10271INin
litigation10272NNlitigation
.10273SENT.
So10274RBso
what10275WPwhat
do10276VVPdo
we10277PPwe
do10278VVPdo
with10279INwith
that10280DTthat
?10281SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10282LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
There10283EXthere
are10284VBPbe
a10285DTa
lot10286NNlot
of10287INof
complaints10288NNScomplaint
about10289INabout
the10290DTthe
ACS10291NPACS
.10292SENT.
The10293DTthe
Census10294NPCensus
Bureau10295NPBureau
's10296POS's
proposal10297NNproposal
to10298TOto
use10299VVuse
administrative10300JJadministrative
records10301NNSrecord
solves10302VVZsolve
most10303JJSmost
of10304INof
them10305PPthem
.10306SENT.
It10307PPit
's10308VBZbe
not10309RBnot
a10310DTa
question10311NNquestion
of10312INof
just10313RBjust
the10314DTthe
ACS10315NPACS
,10316,,
which10317WDTwhich
is10318VBZbe
a10319DTa
survey10320NNsurvey
about10321INabout
which10322WDTwhich
there10323EXthere
have10324VHPhave
been10325VBNbe
many10326JJmany
complaints10327NNScomplaint
,10328,,
and10329CCand
the10330DTthe
...10331:...
putting10332VVGput
the10333DTthe
question10334NNquestion
on10335INon
the10336DTthe
census10337NNcensus
.10338SENT.
The10339DTthe
Census10340NPCensus
Bureau10341NPBureau
is10342VBZbe
...10343:...
they10344PPthey
are10345VBPbe
data10346NNdata
experts10347NNSexpert
.10348SENT.
There10349EXthere
are10350VBPbe
many10351JJmany
ways10352NNSway
of10353INof
trying10354VVGtry
to10355TOto
collect10356VVcollect
data10357NNSdatum
.10358SENT.
The10359DTthe
question10360NNquestion
in10361INin
this10362DTthis
case10363NNcase
is10364VBZbe
whether10365INwhether
doing10366VVGdo
it10367PPit
on10368INon
the10369DTthe
census10370NNcensus
form10371NNform
is10372VBZbe
warranted10373VVNwarrant
,10374,,
even10375RBeven
though10376INthough
it10377PPit
causes10378VVZcause
such10379PDTsuch
a10380DTa
harm10381NNharm
to10382TOto
the10383DTthe
count10384NNcount
.10385SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10386LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I10387PPI
thought10388VVDthink
that10389DTthat
...10390:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10391LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Now10392RBnow
that10393RBthat
brings10394VVZbring
us10395PPus
back10396RBback
...10397:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10398LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...10399:...
Dr10400NNDr
.10401SENT.
Abowd10402NNAbowd
's10403POS's
testimony10404NNtestimony
,10405,,
or10406CCor
at10407INat
least10408JJSleast
the10409DTthe
letter10410NNletter
,10411,,
somewhere10412RBsomewhere
I10413PPI
read10414VVPread
,10415,,
that10416IN/thatthat
they10417PPthey
controlled10418VVDcontrol
for10419INfor
the10420DTthe
...10421:...
for10422INfor
all10423DTall
of10424INof
the10425DTthe
other10426JJother
reasons10427NNSreason
that10428IN/thatthat
Justice10429NPJustice
Gorsuch10430NPGorsuch
was10431VBDbe
mentioning10432VVGmention
as10433INas
reasons10434NNSreason
why10435WRBwhy
people10436NNSpeople
would10437MDwould
not10438RBnot
complete10439VVcomplete
?10440SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10441LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well10442UHwell
,10443,,
they10444PPthey
certainly10445RBcertainly
controlled10446VVDcontrol
for10447INfor
the10448DTthe
length10449NNlength
of10450INof
the10451DTthe
form10452NNform
.10453SENT.
That10454DTthat
was10455VBDbe
the10456DTthe
...10457:...
that10458WDTthat
was10459VBDbe
the10460DTthe
...10461:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]10462LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Well10463UHWell
,10464,,
not10465RBnot
just10466RBjust
that10467RBthat
.10468SENT.
On10469INon
page10470NNpage
11010471CD@card@
...10472:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10473LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Yes10474NPYes
.10475SENT.
Yes10476UHyes
.10477SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]10478LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...10479:...
of10480INof
the10481DTthe
Joint10482NPJoint
Appendix10483NPAppendix
,10484,,
it10485PPit
says10486VVZsay
whether10487INwhether
the10488DTthe
response10489NNresponse
...10490:...
dah-dah-dah10491NNdah-dah-dah
...10492:...
that10493IN/thatthat
they10494PPthey
're10495VBPbe
much10496RBmuch
greater10497JJRgreat
.10498SENT.
It10499PPit
says10500VVZsay
in10501INin
comparable10502JJcomparable
rates10503NNSrate
for10504INfor
other10505JJother
demographic10506JJdemographic
variables10507NNSvariable
,10508,,
like10509INlike
sex10510NNsex
,10511,,
birth10512NNbirth
date10513NNdate
...10514:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10515LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Yes10516NPYes
.10517SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]10518LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...10519:...
age10520NNage
,10521,,
race10522NNrace
,10523,,
ethnicity10524NNethnicity
.10525SENT.
So10526RBso
I10527PPI
thought10528VVDthink
that10529IN/thatthat
that10530DTthat
was10531VBDbe
an10532DTan
effort10533NNeffort
to10534TOto
control10535VVcontrol
for10536INfor
the10537DTthe
things10538NNSthing
that10539IN/thatthat
Justice10540NPJustice
Alito10541NPAlito
...10542:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10543LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
It10544PPit
...10545:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]10546LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...10547:...
mentioned10548VVNmention
insofar10549RBinsofar
as10550INas
their10551PP$their
relevance10552NNrelevance
.10553SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10554LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
It10555PPit
was10556VBDbe
.10557SENT.
The10558DTthe
...10559:...
the10560DTthe
only10561JJonly
limitation10562NNlimitation
on10563INon
it10564PPit
was10565VBDbe
that10566IN/thatthat
they10567PPthey
had10568VHDhave
to10569TOto
deal10570VVdeal
with10571INwith
data10572NNSdatum
that10573WDTthat
already10574RBalready
existed10575VVDexist
.10576SENT.
Dr10577NPDr
.10578SENT.
Abowd10579NNSAbowd
wanted10580VVDwant
to10581TOto
do10582VVdo
a10583DTa
random10584JJrandom
controlled10585JJcontrolled
test10586NNtest
of10587INof
this10588DTthis
question10589NNquestion
and10590CCand
was10591VBDbe
n't10592RBn't
permitted10593VVNpermit
to10594TOto
do10595VVdo
so10596RBso
.10597SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]10598LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But10599CCbut
that10600DTthat
's10601VBZbe
not10602RBnot
...10603:...
that10604WDTthat
's10605VBZbe
a10606DTa
...10607:...
that10608WDTthat
's10609VBZbe
a10610DTa
different10611JJdifferent
issue10612NNissue
,10613,,
is10614VBZbe
n't10615RBn't
it10616PPit
,10617,,
what10618WPwhat
Justice10619NPJustice
Breyer10620NPBreyer
mentioned10621VVDmention
?10622SENT?
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10623LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Yeah10624NPYeah
.10625SENT.
It10626PPit
's10627VBZbe
totally10628RBtotally
different10629JJdifferent
,10630,,
yeah10631RByeah
.10632SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]10633LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
It's10634NPIt's
...10635:...
it10636PPit
's10637VBZbe
...10638:...
it10639PPit
's10640VBZbe
the10641DTthe
decline10642NNdecline
in10643INin
the10644DTthe
response10645NNresponse
rate10646NNrate
based10647VVNbase
on10648INon
those10649DTthose
variables10650NNSvariable
,10651,,
but10652CCbut
not10653RBnot
...10654:...
it10655PPit
does10656VVZdo
n't10657RBn't
...10658:...
it10659PPit
does10660VVZdo
n't10661RBn't
,10662,,
as10663INas
Justice10664NPJustice
Gorsuch10665NPGorsuch
says10666VVZsay
,10667,,
disaggregate10668VVGdisaggregate
the10669DTthe
many10670JJmany
factors10671NNSfactor
that10672WDTthat
could10673MDcould
explain10674VVexplain
a10675DTa
decline10676NNdecline
when10677WRBwhen
you10678PPyou
're10679VBPbe
distinguishing10680VVGdistinguish
between10681INbetween
citizens10682NNScitizen
and10683CCand
non-citizens10684NNSnon-citizens
.10685SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10686LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Well10687UHwell
,10688,,
it10689PPit
did10690VVDdo
try10691VVtry
to10692TOto
control10693VVcontrol
for10694INfor
other10695JJother
properties10696NNSproperty
that10697IN/thatthat
citizens10698NNScitizen
have10699VHPhave
...10700:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10701LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
But10702CCbut
we10703PPwe
do10704VVPdo
n't10705RBn't
...10706:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10707LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
...10708:...
and10709CCand
non-citizens10710NNSnon-citizens
...10711:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10712LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Am10713NPAm
...10714:...
am10715VBPbe
I10716PPI
right10717JJright
...10718:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10719LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
...10720:...
have10721VHPhave
...10722:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10723LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...10724:...
that10725IN/thatthat
there10726RBthere
...10727:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10728LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
It10729PPit
's10730VBZbe
fair10731JJfair
to10732TOto
say10733VVsay
we10734PPwe
do10735VVPdo
n't10736RBn't
have10737VHhave
this10738DTthis
isolated10739JJisolated
,10740,,
though10741RBthough
,10742,,
is10743VBZbe
n't10744RBn't
it10745PPit
?10746SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10747LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
They10748PPthey
did10749VVDdo
their10750PP$their
best10751JJSgood
.10752SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]10753LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
They10754PPthey
did10755VVDdo
their10756PP$their
best10757JJSgood
.10758SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10759LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
There10760EXthere
is10761VBZbe
some10762DTsome
degree10763NNdegree
of10764INof
isolation10765NNisolation
,10766,,
enough10767RBenough
to10768TOto
enable10769VVenable
them10770PPthem
to10771TOto
believe10772VVbelieve
that10773IN/thatthat
they10774PPthey
had10775VHDhave
isolated10776VVNisolate
the10777DTthe
factors10778NNSfactor
that10779IN/thatthat
people10780NNSpeople
thought10781VVDthink
of10782INof
as10783RBas
plausible10784JJplausible
.10785SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]10786LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah10787UHYeah
,10788,,
I10789PPI
mean10790VVPmean
...10791:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10792LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Would10793MDwould
it10794PPit
be10795VBbe
right10796JJright
to10797TOto
say10798VVsay
...10799:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]10800LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...10801:...
there10802EXthere
are10803VBPbe
a10804DTa
million10805CDmillion
factors10806NNSfactor
.10807SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10808LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Yes10809NPYes
.10810SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]10811LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
There10812RBthere
's10813POS's
pet10814JJpet
dogs10815NNSdog
,10816,,
you10817PPyou
know10818VVPknow
.10819SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10820LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Yes10821NPYes
.10822SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]10823LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I10824PPI
mean10825VVPmean
,10826,,
there10827EXthere
are10828VBPbe
cats10829NNScat
.10830SENT.
And10831CCand
...10832:...
and10833CCand
so10834RBso
,10835,,
if10836INif
,10837,,
in10838INin
fact10839NNfact
,10840,,
there10841EXthere
were10842VBDbe
some10843DTsome
factors10844NNSfactor
that10845WDTthat
are10846VBPbe
relevant10847JJrelevant
which10848WDTwhich
were10849VBDbe
not10850RBnot
in10851INin
the10852DTthe
data10853NNSdatum
because10854INbecause
they10855PPthey
only10856RBonly
controlled10857VVDcontrol
for10858INfor
six10859CDsix
other10860JJother
factors10861NNSfactor
instead10862RBinstead
of10863INof
60010864CD@card@
,10865,,
I10866PPI
would10867MDwould
expect10868VVexpect
somewhere10869RBsomewhere
in10870INin
this10871DTthis
record10872NNrecord
someone10873NNsomeone
to10874TOto
have10875VHhave
written10876VVNwrite
that10877IN/thatthat
there10878EXthere
were10879VBDbe
these10880DTthese
other10881JJother
factors10882NNSfactor
that10883WDTthat
also10884RBalso
should10885MDshould
have10886VHhave
been10887VBNbe
controlled10888VVNcontrol
for10889INfor
.10890SENT.
I10891PPI
know10892VVPknow
what10893WPwhat
you10894PPyou
're10895VBPbe
going10896VVGgo
to10897TOto
say10898VVsay
,10899,,
unless10900INunless
I10901PPI
'm10902VBPbe
wrong10903JJwrong
,10904,,
you10905PPyou
better10906VVPbetter
not10907RBnot
tell10908VVtell
me10909PPme
that10910IN/thatthat
I10911PPI
am10912VBPbe
right10913RBright
if10914INif
I10915PPI
'm10916VBPbe
not10917RBnot
.10918SENT.
But10919CCbut
I10920PPI
could10921MDcould
not10922RBnot
...10923:...
[10924SYM[
LAUGHTER10925NNlaughter
]10926SYM]
[JUSTICE BREYER]10927LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...10928:...
find10929VVfind
any10930DTany
such10931JJsuch
place10932NNplace
in10933INin
the10934DTthe
record10935NNrecord
.10936SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10937LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Nobody10938NNnobody
proposed10939VVNpropose
,10940,,
that10941IN/thatthat
I10942PPI
know10943VVPknow
of10944INof
,10945,,
proposed10946VVNpropose
factors10947NNSfactor
that10948WDTthat
might10949MDmight
be10950VBbe
alternative10951JJalternative
explanations10952NNSexplanation
that10953WDTthat
should10954MDshould
have10955VHhave
been10956VBNbe
tested10957VVNtest
for10958INfor
.10959SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10960LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
And10961CCand
...10962:...
and10963CCand
would10964MDwould
it10965PPit
be10966VBbe
right10967JJright
to10968TOto
say10969VVsay
,10970,,
General10971NPGeneral
,10972,,
that10973WDTthat
it10974PPit
was10975VBDbe
the10976DTthe
Census10977NPCensus
Bureau10978NPBureau
's10979POS's
conclusion10980NNconclusion
,10981,,
a10982DTa
bureau10983NNbureau
full10984JJfull
of10985INof
statisticians10986NNSstatistician
...10987:...
[MS. UNDERWOOD]10988LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Yes10989NPYes
.10990SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10991LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...10992:...
that10993IN/thatthat
it10994PPit
was10995VBDbe
the10996DTthe
citizen10997NNcitizen
...10998:...
citizenship10999NNcitizenship
question11000NNquestion
that11001WDTthat
was11002VBDbe
driving11003VVGdrive
the11004DTthe
differential11005JJdifferential
response11006NNresponse
rates11007NNSrate
?11008SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]11009LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
That11010DTthat
is11011VBZbe
...11012:...
that11013WDTthat
is11014VBZbe
correct11015JJcorrect
.11016SENT.
I11017PPI
do11018VVPdo
want11019VVwant
to11020TOto
make11021VVmake
...11022:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11023LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Are11024VBPbe
there11025RBthere
other11026JJother
...11027:...
are11028VBPbe
there11029RBthere
other11030JJother
questions11031NNSquestion
on11032INon
the11033DTthe
census11034NNcensus
for11035INfor
which11036WDTwhich
the11037DTthe
administrative11038JJadministrative
records11039NNSrecord
provide11040VVPprovide
more11041RBRmore
accurate11042JJaccurate
information11043NNinformation
?11044SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]11045LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
There11046EXthere
is11047VBZbe
nothing11048NNnothing
in11049INin
the11050DTthe
record11051NNrecord
about11052INabout
that11053DTthat
.11054SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11055LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well11056UHWell
,11057,,
then11058RBthen
I11059PPI
do11060VVPdo
n't11061RBn't
want11062VVwant
to11063TOto
hear11064VVhear
about11065INabout
it11066PPit
.11067SENT.
[MS. UNDERWOOD]11068LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
Okay11069NPOkay
.11070SENT.
Okay11071JJokay
.11072SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]11073LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Could11074MDcould
you11075PPyou
answer11076VVanswer
the11077DTthe
General11078NPGeneral
's11079POS's
point11080NNpoint
that11081IN/thatthat
,11082,,
if11083INif
you11084PPyou
rely11085VVPrely
on11086INon
611087CD6
(11088((
c11089LSc
)11090))
,11091,,
then11092RBthen
you11093PPyou
should11094MDshould
n't11095RBn't
be11096VBbe
even11097RBeven
asking11098VVGask
this11099DTthis
on11100INon
the11101DTthe
ACS11102NPACS
form11103NNform
?11104SENT?
[MS. UNDERWOOD]11105LOC[MS. UNDERWOOD]
No11106NPNo
.11107SENT.
The11108DTthe
...11109:...
for11110INfor
one11111CDone
thing11112NNthing
,11113,,
in11114INin
order11115NNorder
to11116TOto
do11117VVdo
modeling11118NNmodeling
,11119,,
in11120INin
order11121NNorder
to11122TOto
do11123VVdo
sampling11124NNsampling
,11125,,
they11126PPthey
need11127VVPneed
some11128DTsome
survey11129NNsurvey
data11130NNSdatum
to11131TOto
compare11132VVcompare
it11133PPit
to11134TOto
.11135SENT.
And11136CCand
so11137RBso
some11138DTsome
judgments11139NNSjudgment
can11140MDcan
be11141VBbe
made11142VVNmake
,11143,,
and11144CCand
the11145DTthe
judgment11146NNjudgment
might11147MDmight
be11148VBbe
made11149VVNmake
that11150IN/thatthat
the11151DTthe
ACS11152NPACS
or11153CCor
some11154DTsome
questionnaire11155NNquestionnaire
that11156WDTthat
does11157VVZdo
n't11158RBn't
involve11159VVinvolve
harm11160NNharm
to11161TOto
the11162DTthe
count11163NNcount
that11164WDTthat
is11165VBZbe
sampling11166NNsampling
or11167CCor
...11168:...
or11169CCor
some11170DTsome
other11171JJother
form11172NNform
of11173INof
...11174:...
less11175RBRless
...11176:...
less11177RBRless
than11178INthan
universal11179JJuniversal
questioning11180VVGquestion
,11181,,
that11182IN/thatthat
testing11183NNtesting
questions11184NNSquestion
on11185INon
that11186DTthat
kind11187NNkind
of11188INof
instrument11189NNinstrument
is11190VBZbe
the11191DTthe
way11192NNway
to11193TOto
do11194VVdo
it11195PPit
.11196SENT.
But11197CCbut
...11198:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11199LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank11200VVthank
you11201PPyou
.11202SENT.
Thank11203VVthank
you11204PPyou
,11205,,
General11206NPGeneral
.11207SENT.
Mr11208NPMr
.11209SENT.
Ho11210NPHo
.11211SENT.
[MR. HO]11212LOC[MR. HO]
Mr11213NPMr
.11214SENT.
Chief11215NPChief
Justice11216NPJustice
,11217,,
and11218CCand
may11219MDmay
it11220PPit
please11221VVplease
the11222DTthe
Court11223NPCourt
:11224::
The11225DTthe
Secretary11226NPSecretary
's11227POS's
decision11228NNdecision
rested11229VVDrest
primarily11230RBprimarily
on11231INon
one11232CDone
assertion11233NNassertion
,11234,,
that11235WDTthat
it11236PPit
would11237MDwould
improve11238VVimprove
the11239DTthe
accuracy11240NNaccuracy
of11241INof
citizenship11242NNcitizenship
data11243NNSdatum
provided11244VVDprovide
to11245TOto
the11246DTthe
Department11247NPDepartment
of11248INof
Justice11249NPJustice
.11250SENT.
But11251CCbut
the11252DTthe
administrative11253JJadministrative
record11254NNrecord
revealed11255VVDreveal
precisely11256RBprecisely
the11257DTthe
opposite11258NNopposite
,11259,,
that11260WDTthat
it11261PPit
would11262MDwould
make11263VVmake
that11264DTthat
data11265NNSdatum
less11266RBRless
accurate11267JJaccurate
and11268CCand
,11269,,
thus11270RBthus
,11271,,
harm11272VVPharm
the11273DTthe
Secretary11274NPSecretary
's11275POS's
stated11276JJstated
purpose11277NNpurpose
of11278INof
Voting11279NPVoting
Rights11280NPSRights
Act11281NPAct
enforcement11282NNenforcement
.11283SENT.
And11284CCand
the11285DTthe
Secretary11286NPSecretary
's11287POS's
explanation11288NNexplanation
for11289INfor
his11290PP$his
decision11291NNdecision
misstated11292VVDmisstate
the11293DTthe
evidence11294NNevidence
in11295INin
the11296DTthe
record11297NNrecord
in11298INin
three11299CDthree
critical11300JJcritical
respects11301NNSrespect
.11302SENT.
First11303RBfirst
,11304,,
the11305DTthe
Secretary11306NPSecretary
asserted11307VVDassert
that11308IN/thatthat
adding11309VVGadd
the11310DTthe
question11311NNquestion
would11312MDwould
maximize11313VVmaximize
the11314DTthe
Census11315NPCensus
Bureau11316NPBureau
's11317POS's
ability11318NNability
to11319TOto
use11320VVuse
administrative11321JJadministrative
records11322NNSrecord
on11323INon
citizenship11324NNcitizenship
.11325SENT.
But11326CCbut
the11327DTthe
government11328NNgovernment
has11329VHZhave
conceded11330VVNconcede
that11331IN/thatthat
that11332DTthat
was11333VBDbe
not11334RBnot
true11335JJtrue
.11336SENT.
At11337INat
page11338NNpage
3211339CD@card@
of11340INof
their11341PP$their
brief11342NNbrief
,11343,,
they11344PPthey
acknowledge11345VVPacknowledge
that11346IN/thatthat
,11347,,
if11348INif
the11349DTthe
question11350NNquestion
is11351VBZbe
added11352VVNadd
,11353,,
the11354DTthe
number11355NNnumber
of11356INof
people11357NNSpeople
who11358WPwho
can11359MDcan
be11360VBbe
matched11361VVNmatch
to11362TOto
these11363DTthese
administrative11364JJadministrative
records11365NNSrecord
,11366,,
the11367DTthe
most11368RBSmost
accurate11369JJaccurate
information11370NNinformation
that11371IN/thatthat
we11372PPwe
have11373VHPhave
on11374INon
citizenship11375NNcitizenship
,11376,,
will11377MDwill
fall11378VVfall
by11379INby
one11380CDone
million11381CDmillion
.11382SENT.
Second11383RBsecond
,11384,,
the11385DTthe
Secretary11386NPSecretary
asserted11387VVDassert
that11388IN/thatthat
adding11389VVGadd
the11390DTthe
question11391NNquestion
would11392MDwould
improve11393VVimprove
the11394DTthe
bureau11395NNbureau
's11396POS's
imputation11397NNimputation
of11398INof
citizenship11399NNcitizenship
for11400INfor
people11401NNSpeople
who11402WPwho
lack11403VVPlack
...11404:...
for11405INfor
people11406NNSpeople
for11407INfor
whom11408WPwhom
the11409DTthe
government11410NNgovernment
lacks11411VVZlack
any11412DTany
such11413JJsuch
records11414NNSrecord
.11415SENT.
But11416CCbut
the11417DTthe
government11418NNgovernment
has11419VHZhave
conceded11420VVNconcede
that11421IN/thatthat
that11422DTthat
was11423VBDbe
not11424RBnot
true11425JJtrue
either11426RBeither
.11427SENT.
At11428INat
page11429NNpage
3411430CD@card@
of11431INof
their11432PP$their
opening11433NNopening
brief11434NNbrief
,11435,,
they11436PPthey
acknowledge11437VVPacknowledge
that11438IN/thatthat
the11439DTthe
Census11440NPCensus
Bureau11441NPBureau
determined11442VVDdetermine
that11443IN/thatthat
if11444INif
the11445DTthe
question11446NNquestion
is11447VBZbe
added11448VVNadd
,11449,,
the11450DTthe
imputation11451NNimputation
process11452NNprocess
will11453MDwill
become11454VVbecome
less11455RBRless
accurate11456JJaccurate
.11457SENT.
And11458CCand
here11459RBhere
's11460VBZbe
why11461WRBwhy
:11462::
The11463DTthe
accuracy11464NNaccuracy
of11465INof
imputation11466NNimputation
depends11467VVZdepend
upon11468INupon
the11469DTthe
accuracy11470NNaccuracy
of11471INof
existing11472VVGexist
data11473NNSdatum
.11474SENT.
Federal11475JJFederal
administrative11476JJadministrative
records11477NNSrecord
are11478VBPbe
based11479VVNbase
on11480INon
a11481DTa
person11482NNperson
's11483POS's
legal11484JJlegal
documents11485NNSdocument
of11486INof
their11487PP$their
citizenship11488NNcitizenship
and11489CCand
,11490,,
thus11491RBthus
,11492,,
are11493VBPbe
quite11494RBquite
accurate11495JJaccurate
and11496CCand
reliable11497JJreliable
for11498INfor
this11499DTthis
purpose11500NNpurpose
.11501SENT.
But11502CCbut
the11503DTthe
citizenship11504NNcitizenship
question11505NNquestion
is11506VBZbe
not11507RBnot
.11508SENT.
The11509DTthe
evidence11510NNevidence
shows11511VVZshow
that11512IN/thatthat
non-citizens11513NNSnon-citizens
respond11514VVrespond
to11515TOto
the11516DTthe
question11517NNquestion
inaccurately11518RBinaccurately
one-third11519JJone-third
of11520INof
the11521DTthe
time11522NNtime
.11523SENT.
So11524RBso
,11525,,
if11526INif
the11527DTthe
question11528NNquestion
is11529VBZbe
used11530VVNuse
,11531,,
the11532DTthe
data11533NNdata
that11534WDTthat
's11535VBZbe
used11536VVNuse
for11537INfor
imputation11538NNimputation
will11539MDwill
be11540VBbe
contaminated11541VVNcontaminate
by11542INby
those11543DTthose
incorrect11544JJincorrect
responses11545NNSresponse
,11546,,
making11547VVGmake
the11548DTthe
output11549NNoutput
of11550INof
the11551DTthe
imputation11552NNimputation
process11553NNprocess
less11554RBRless
accurate11555JJaccurate
,11556,,
making11557VVGmake
the11558DTthe
data11559NNSdatum
less11560RBRless
accurate11561JJaccurate
,11562,,
and11563CCand
,11564,,
again11565RBagain
,11566,,
harming11567VVGharm
the11568DTthe
Secretary11569NPSecretary
's11570POS's
stated11571JJstated
purpose11572NNpurpose
of11573INof
improving11574VVGimprove
the11575DTthe
accuracy11576NNaccuracy
of11577INof
citizenship11578NNcitizenship
information11579NNinformation
.11580SENT.
The11581DTthe
Secretary11582NPSecretary
misstated11583VVDmisstate
the11584DTthe
evidence11585NNevidence
in11586INin
a11587DTa
third11588JJthird
respect11589NNrespect
.11590SENT.
He11591PPhe
asserted11592VVDassert
that11593IN/thatthat
adding11594VVGadd
the11595DTthe
question11596NNquestion
would11597MDwould
fill11598VVfill
in11599INin
the11600DTthe
gaps11601NNSgap
in11602INin
2211603CD@card@
million11604CDmillion
...11605:...
for11606INfor
2211607CD@card@
million11608CDmillion
people11609NNSpeople
in11610INin
administrative11611JJadministrative
records11612NNSrecord
on11613INon
citizenship11614NNcitizenship
.11615SENT.
But11616CCbut
the11617DTthe
Census11618NPCensus
Bureau11619NPBureau
concluded11620VVDconclude
specifically11621RBspecifically
,11622,,
on11623INon
the11624DTthe
last11625JJlast
page11626NNpage
of11627INof
their11628PP$their
March11629NPMarch
111630CD1
memo11631NNmemo
in11632INin
the11633DTthe
administrative11634JJadministrative
record11635NNrecord
,11636,,
that11637IN/thatthat
the11638DTthe
Secretary11639NPSecretary
's11640POS's
decision11641NNdecision
will11642MDwill
not11643RBnot
solve11644VVsolve
that11645DTthat
problem11646NNproblem
.11647SENT.
And11648CCand
the11649DTthe
reason11650NNreason
is11651VBZbe
,11652,,
again11653RBagain
,11654,,
because11655INbecause
responses11656NNSresponse
to11657TOto
the11658DTthe
question11659NNquestion
are11660VBPbe
highly11661RBhighly
inaccurate11662JJinaccurate
,11663,,
whereas11664INwhereas
the11665DTthe
imputation11666NNimputation
process11667NNprocess
,11668,,
based11669VVNbase
solely11670RBsolely
on11671INon
...11672:...
on11673INon
administrative11674JJadministrative
records11675NNSrecord
,11676,,
would11677MDwould
be11678VBbe
more11679RBRmore
accurate11680JJaccurate
.11681SENT.
That11682DTthat
's11683VBZbe
reflected11684VVNreflect
in11685INin
the11686DTthe
Census11687NPCensus
Bureau11688NPBureau
's11689POS's
bottom-line11690JJbottom-line
conclusion11691NNconclusion
in11692INin
its11693PP$its
March11694NPMarch
111695CD1
memo11696NNmemo
,11697,,
and11698CCand
it11699PPit
's11700VBZbe
reflected11701VVNreflect
in11702INin
the11703DTthe
testimony11704NNtestimony
of11705INof
Dr11706NPDr
.11707SENT.
Abowd11708NNSAbowd
on11709INon
that11710DTthat
trial11711NNtrial
.11712SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]11713LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But11714CCbut
this11715DTthis
takes11716VVZtake
us11717PPus
back11718RBback
,11719,,
does11720VVZdo
it11721PPit
not11722RBnot
,11723,,
if11724INif
I11725PPI
'm11726VBPbe
following11727VVGfollow
your11728PP$your
argument11729NNargument
,11730,,
to11731TOto
the11732DTthe
2211733CD@card@
.11734SENT.
611735CD6
million11736CDmillion
people11737NNSpeople
who11738WPwho
will11739MDwill
answer11740VVanswer
the11741DTthe
citizenship11742NNcitizenship
question11743NNquestion
but11744CCbut
as11745INas
to11746TOto
whom11747WPwhom
there11748RBthere
are11749VBPbe
n't11750RBn't
administrative11751JJadministrative
records11752NNSrecord
?11753SENT?
That11754DTthat
's11755VBZbe
what11756WPwhat
you11757PPyou
're11758VBPbe
talking11759VVGtalk
about11760RBabout
?11761SENT?
[MR. HO]11762LOC[MR. HO]
Yes11763NPYes
,11764,,
Justice11765NPJustice
Alito11766NPAlito
.11767SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]11768LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Okay11769NPOkay
.11770SENT.
And11771CCand
so11772RBso
then11773RBthen
this11774DTthis
is11775VBZbe
territory11776NNterritory
that11777DTthat
we've11778NNwe've
...11779:...
we11780PPwe
've11781VHPhave
covered11782VVNcover
,11783,,
but11784CCbut
,11785,,
if11786INif
the11787DTthe
Secretary11788NPSecretary
is11789VBZbe
told11790VVNtell
here11791RBhere
's11792VBZbe
the11793DTthe
error11794NNerror
rate11795NNrate
that11796IN/thatthat
we11797PPwe
can11798MDcan
expect11799VVexpect
for11800INfor
those11801DTthose
who11802WPwho
answer11803VVPanswer
the11804DTthe
citizenship11805NNcitizenship
question11806NNquestion
,11807,,
and11808CCand
on11809INon
the11810DTthe
other11811JJother
hand11812NNhand
,11813,,
we11814PPwe
have11815VHPhave
this11816DTthis
model11817NNmodel
and11818CCand
we11819PPwe
can11820MDcan
't11821RB't
tell11822VVtell
you11823PPyou
how11824WRBhow
accurate11825JJaccurate
it11826PPit
is11827VBZbe
,11828,,
but11829CCbut
trust11830VVtrust
us11831PPus
,11832,,
it11833PPit
's11834VBZbe
going11835VVGgo
to11836TOto
be11837VBbe
better11838JJRgood
,11839,,
is11840VBZbe
it11841PPit
arbitrary11842JJarbitrary
and11843CCand
capricious11844JJcapricious
for11845INfor
the11846DTthe
Secretary11847NPSecretary
to11848TOto
say11849VVsay
,11850,,
I11851PPI
do11852VVPdo
n't11853RBn't
want11854VVwant
to11855TOto
go11856VVgo
with11857INwith
this11858DTthis
model11859NNmodel
because11860INbecause
I11861PPI
do11862VVPdo
n't11863RBn't
know11864VVknow
what11865WPwhat
the11866DTthe
accuracy11867NNaccuracy
of11868INof
that11869WDTthat
is11870VBZbe
?11871SENT?
[MR. HO]11872LOC[MR. HO]
Justice11873NPJustice
Alito11874NPAlito
,11875,,
respectfully11876RBrespectfully
,11877,,
I11878PPI
think11879VVPthink
the11880DTthe
Census11881NPCensus
Bureau11882NPBureau
said11883VVDsay
a11884DTa
little11885JJlittle
bit11886NNbit
more11887RBRmore
than11888INthan
trust11889VVtrust
us11890PPus
.11891SENT.
What11892WPWhat
the11893DTthe
Census11894NPCensus
Bureau11895NPBureau
said11896VVDsay
was11897VBDbe
we11898PPwe
can11899MDcan
develop11900VVdevelop
a11901DTa
highly11902RBhighly
accurate11903JJaccurate
model11904NNmodel
for11905INfor
this11906DTthis
that11907WDTthat
's11908VBZbe
going11909VVGgo
to11910TOto
be11911VBbe
better11912JJRgood
than11913INthan
getting11914VVGget
the11915DTthe
question11916NNquestion
wrong11917JJwrong
one-third11918NNone-third
of11919INof
the11920DTthe
time11921NNtime
,11922,,
which11923WDTwhich
is11924VBZbe
what11925WPwhat
...11926:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]11927LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Yeah11928UHYeah
,11929,,
well11930UHwell
,11931,,
they11932PPthey
said11933VVDsay
,11934,,
in11935INin
our11936PP$our
opinion11937NNopinion
,11938,,
this11939DTthis
would11940MDwould
be11941VBbe
better11942JJRgood
,11943,,
but11944CCbut
they11945PPthey
can11946MDcan
't11947RB't
quantify11948VVquantify
it11949PPit
.11950SENT.
They11951PPthey
...11952:...
they11953PPthey
do11954VVPdo
n't11955RBn't
provide11956VVprovide
a11957DTa
specific11958JJspecific
number11959NNnumber
;11960:;
they11961PPthey
do11962VVPdo
n't11963RBn't
even11964RBeven
provide11965VVprovide
a11966DTa
range11967NNrange
.11968SENT.
Am11969VBPbe
I11970PPI
right11971JJright
on11972INon
that11973DTthat
?11974SENT?
[MR. HO]11975LOC[MR. HO]
They11976PPthey
do11977VVPdo
say11978VVsay
that11979IN/thatthat
it11980PPit
would11981MDwould
be11982VBbe
more11983RBRmore
accurate11984JJaccurate
than11985INthan
responses11986NNSresponse
to11987TOto
the11988DTthe
citizenship11989NNcitizenship
question11990NNquestion
,11991,,
which11992WDTwhich
they11993PPthey
do11994VVPdo
quantify11995VVquantify
as11996INas
being11997VBGbe
incorrect11998JJincorrect
one-third11999NNone-third
of12000INof
the12001DTthe
time12002NNtime
for12003INfor
non-citizens12004NNSnon-citizens
.12005SENT.
And12006CCand
if12007INif
I12008PPI
could12009MDcould
get12010VVget
back12011RBback
to12012TOto
...12013:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12014LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
But12015CCbut
it12016PPit
is12017VBZbe
a12018DTa
...12019:...
[MR. HO]12020LOC[MR. HO]
...12021:...
Justice12022NPJustice
Kavanaugh's12023NPKavanaugh's
...12024:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12025LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Go12026NPGo
...12027:...
go12028VVPgo
ahead12029RBahead
.12030SENT.
[MR. HO]12031LOC[MR. HO]
Oh12032UHoh
,12033,,
I12034PPI
'm12035VBPbe
sorry12036JJsorry
.12037SENT.
Justice12038NPJustice
Kavanaugh12039NPKavanaugh
's12040POS's
question12041NNquestion
earlier12042RBRearlier
about12043RBabout
whether12044INwhether
or12045CCor
not12046RBnot
that12047WDTthat
can12048MDcan
help12049VVhelp
with12050INwith
Voting12051NPVoting
Rights12052NPSRights
Act12053NPAct
enforcement12054NNenforcement
,12055,,
it12056PPit
can12057MDcan
't12058RB't
.12059SENT.
And12060CCand
...12061:...
and12062CCand
here12063RBhere
's12064VBZbe
why12065NNwhy
:12066::
Citizenship12067NNcitizenship
data12068NNSdatum
matters12069NNSmatter
in12070INin
the12071DTthe
Voting12072NPVoting
Rights12073NPSRights
Act12074NPAct
.12075SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12076LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I12077PPI
'm12078VBPbe
sorry12079JJsorry
,12080,,
just12081RBjust
to12082TOto
...12083:...
what12084WPwhat
can12085MDcan
't12086RB't
?12087SENT?
[MR. HO]12088LOC[MR. HO]
I12089PPI
'm12090VBPbe
sorry12091JJsorry
.12092SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12093LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I12094PPI
lost12095VVDlose
sight12096NNsight
of12097INof
the12098DTthe
"12099``"
it12100PPit
"12101''"
in12102INin
your12103PP$your
answer12104NNanswer
.12105SENT.
[MR. HO]12106LOC[MR. HO]
The12107NPThe
Secretary12108NPSecretary
's12109POS's
question12110NNquestion
,12111,,
Mr12112NPMr
.12113SENT.
Chief12114NNchief
...12115:...
the12116DTthe
Secretary12117NPSecretary
's12118POS's
decision12119NNdecision
,12120,,
Mr12121NPMr
.12122SENT.
Chief12123NPChief
Justice12124NPJustice
.12125SENT.
And12126CCand
responses12127NNSresponse
...12128:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12129LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I12130PPI
thought12131VVDthink
you12132PPyou
were12133VBDbe
talking12134VVGtalk
about12135RBabout
whether12136INwhether
it12137PPit
's12138VBZbe
helpful12139JJhelpful
with12140INwith
respect12141NNrespect
to12142TOto
the12143DTthe
voting12144NNvoting
rights12145NNSright
information12146NNinformation
.12147SENT.
[MR. HO]12148LOC[MR. HO]
That12149DTthat
's12150VBZbe
right12151JJright
.12152SENT.
Adding12153VVGadd
a12154DTa
citizenship12155NNcitizenship
question12156NNquestion
to12157TOto
the12158DTthe
census12159NNcensus
,12160,,
I12161PPI
'm12162VBPbe
sorry12163JJsorry
,12164,,
is12165VBZbe
not12166RBnot
helpful12167JJhelpful
for12168INfor
Voting12169NPVoting
Rights12170NPSRights
Act12171NPAct
purposes12172NNSpurpose
because12173INbecause
responses12174NNSresponse
to12175TOto
the12176DTthe
question12177NNquestion
are12178VBPbe
inaccurate12179JJinaccurate
so12180RBso
frequently12181RBfrequently
for12182INfor
non-citizens12183NNSnon-citizens
.12184SENT.
Citizenship12185NNcitizenship
matters12186NNSmatter
in12187INin
the12188DTthe
Voting12189NPVoting
Rights12190NPSRights
Act12191NPAct
context12192NNcontext
when12193WRBwhen
you12194PPyou
're12195VBPbe
dealing12196VVGdeal
with12197INwith
a12198DTa
population12199NNpopulation
in12200INin
which12201WDTwhich
there12202EXthere
's12203VBZbe
a12204DTa
large12205JJlarge
number12206NNnumber
of12207INof
non-citizens12208NNSnon-citizens
.12209SENT.
The12210DTthe
VRA12211NPVRA
requires12212VVZrequire
the12213DTthe
drawing12214NNdrawing
of12215INof
districts12216NNSdistrict
in12217INin
which12218WDTwhich
minority12219NNminority
voters12220NNSvoter
constitute12221VVPconstitute
a12222DTa
majority12223NNmajority
sometimes12224RBsometimes
under12225INunder
some12226DTsome
circumstances12227NNScircumstance
.12228SENT.
Now12229RBnow
,12230,,
under12231INunder
normal12232JJnormal
circumstances12233NNScircumstance
,12234,,
voting12235VVGvote
age12236NNage
population12237NNpopulation
data12238NNSdatum
will12239MDwill
be12240VBbe
sufficient12241JJsufficient
for12242INfor
that12243DTthat
purpose12244NNpurpose
if12245INif
citizenship12246NNcitizenship
rates12247NNSrate
are12248VBPbe
high12249JJhigh
.12250SENT.
But12251CCbut
,12252,,
if12253INif
the12254DTthe
minority12255NNminority
group12256NNgroup
has12257VHZhave
relatively12258RBrelatively
low12259JJlow
citizenship12260NNcitizenship
rates12261NNSrate
,12262,,
for12263INfor
example12264NNexample
,12265,,
as12266INas
is12267VBZbe
the12268DTthe
case12269NNcase
with12270INwith
Hispanic12271JJHispanic
populations12272NNSpopulation
in12273INin
some12274DTsome
circumstances12275NNScircumstance
,12276,,
then12277RBthen
you12278PPyou
need12279VVPneed
citizenship12280NNcitizenship
data12281NNSdatum
to12282TOto
make12283VVmake
sure12284JJsure
that12285IN/thatthat
you12286PPyou
're12287VBPbe
drawing12288VVGdraw
a12289DTa
district12290NNdistrict
in12291INin
which12292WDTwhich
minority12293NNminority
voters12294NNSvoter
are12295VBPbe
,12296,,
in12297INin
fact12298NNfact
,12299,,
a12300DTa
majority12301NNmajority
of12302INof
the12303DTthe
population12304NNpopulation
.12305SENT.
And12306CCand
data12307NNSdatum
that12308WDTthat
's12309VBZbe
wrong12310JJwrong
one-third12311NNone-third
of12312INof
the12313DTthe
...12314:...
the12315DTthe
time12316NNtime
with12317INwith
respect12318NNrespect
to12319TOto
non-citizens12320NNnon-citizens
just12321RBjust
does12322VVZdo
n't12323RBn't
help12324VVhelp
you12325PPyou
draw12326VVdraw
districts12327NNSdistrict
...12328:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12329LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well12330UHWell
,12331,,
when12332WRBwhen
we12333PPwe
...12334:...
[MR. HO]12335LOC[MR. HO]
...12336:...
at12337INat
that12338DTthat
granular12339JJgranular
block-by-block12340NNblock-by-block
level12341NNlevel
.12342SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12343LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well12344UHWell
,12345,,
when12346WRBwhen
we12347PPwe
talk12348VVPtalk
about12349INabout
the12350DTthe
block-by-block12351NNblock-by-block
level12352NNlevel
,12353,,
one12354CDone
of12355INof
the12356DTthe
complaints12357NNScomplaint
that12358IN/thatthat
we12359PPwe
've12360VHPhave
heard12361VVNhear
from12362INfrom
the12363DTthe
other12364JJother
side12365NNside
is12366VBZbe
that12367IN/thatthat
the12368DTthe
data12369NNdata
that12370IN/thatthat
we12371PPwe
rely12372VVPrely
on12373INon
from12374INfrom
the12375DTthe
ACS12376NPACS
is12377VBZbe
at12378INat
too12379RBtoo
high12380JJhigh
a12381DTa
level12382NNlevel
and12383CCand
that12384IN/thatthat
the12385DTthe
census12386NNcensus
goes12387VVZgo
down12388RPdown
to12389TOto
a12390DTa
more12391RBRmore
granular12392JJgranular
level12393NNlevel
.12394SENT.
And12395CCand
,12396,,
in12397INin
fact12398NNfact
,12399,,
some12400DTsome
of12401INof
the12402DTthe
states12403NNSstate
who12404WPwho
are12405VBPbe
now12406RBnow
Respondents12407NNSrespondent
before12408INbefore
us12409PPus
have12410VHPhave
in12411INin
litigation12412NNlitigation
,12413,,
including12414VVGinclude
in12415INin
this12416DTthis
Court12417NPCourt
,12418,,
argued12419VVDargue
that12420IN/thatthat
ACS12421NPACS
data12422NNSdatum
should12423MDshould
not12424RBnot
be12425VBbe
relied12426VVNrely
upon12427RPupon
for12428INfor
purposes12429NNSpurpose
of12430INof
citizenship12431NNcitizenship
or12432CCor
other12433JJother
purposes12434NNSpurpose
,12435,,
that12436IN/thatthat
the12437DTthe
census12438NNcensus
data12439NNdata
is12440VBZbe
more12441RBRmore
accurate12442JJaccurate
.12443SENT.
What12444WPWhat
do12445VVPdo
we12446PPwe
do12447VVPdo
about12448RBabout
that12449RBthat
?12450SENT?
It12451PPit
seems12452VVZseem
to12453TOto
me12454PPme
like12455INlike
you12456PPyou
kind12457RBkind
of12458INof
put12459VVput
the12460DTthe
government12461NNgovernment
in12462INin
a12463DTa
bit12464NNbit
of12465INof
a12466DTa
Catch12467NNcatch
2212468CD@card@
.12469SENT.
You12470PPyou
say12471VVPsay
they12472PPthey
should12473MDshould
n't12474RBn't
use12475VVuse
the12476DTthe
census12477NNcensus
,12478,,
except12479INexcept
for12480INfor
in12481INin
later12482JJRlate
litigation12483NNlitigation
when12484WRBwhen
they12485PPthey
have12486VHPhave
to12487TOto
use12488VVuse
the12489DTthe
census12490NNcensus
.12491SENT.
[MR. HO]12492LOC[MR. HO]
Justice12493NPJustice
Gorsuch12494NPGorsuch
,12495,,
let12496VVDlet
me12497PPme
say12498VVPsay
two12499CDtwo
things12500NNSthing
in12501INin
response12502NNresponse
to12503TOto
that12504DTthat
.12505SENT.
The12506DTthe
first12507JJfirst
is12508VBZbe
that12509IN/thatthat
,12510,,
to12511TOto
the12512DTthe
extent12513NNextent
that12514IN/thatthat
more12515RBRmore
granular12516JJgranular
citizenship12517NNcitizenship
data12518NNSdatum
were12519VBDbe
,12520,,
in12521INin
fact12522NNfact
,12523,,
necessary12524JJnecessary
for12525INfor
Voting12526NPVoting
Rights12527NPSRights
Act12528NPAct
enforcement12529NNenforcement
purposes12530NNSpurpose
,12531,,
and12532CCand
we12533PPwe
,12534,,
I12535PPI
think12536VVPthink
,12537,,
set12538VVPset
forth12539RBforth
a12540DTa
number12541NNnumber
of12542INof
reasons12543NNSreason
in12544INin
our12545PP$our
brief12546NNbrief
why12547WRBwhy
that12548DTthat
's12549VBZbe
not12550RBnot
,12551,,
in12552INin
fact12553NNfact
,12554,,
the12555DTthe
case12556NNcase
,12557,,
but12558CCbut
just12559RBjust
assuming12560VVGassume
that12561IN/thatthat
it12562PPit
is12563VBZbe
,12564,,
the12565DTthe
...12566:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12567LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Well12568UHwell
,12569,,
we12570PPwe
...12571:...
we12572PPwe
know12573VVPknow
states12574NNSstate
have12575VHPhave
argued12576VVNargue
this12577DTthis
,12578,,
including12579VVGinclude
some12580DTsome
of12581INof
the12582DTthe
Respondents12583NNSrespondent
before12584INbefore
us12585PPus
.12586SENT.
So12587RBso
I'm12588NPI'm
...12589:...
you12590PPyou
know12591VVPknow
,12592,,
it12593PPit
is12594VBZbe
a12595DTa
thing12596NNthing
.12597SENT.
[MR. HO]12598LOC[MR. HO]
Okay12599NPOkay
,12600,,
that12601WDTthat
...12602:...
that12603WDTthat
's12604VBZbe
fair12605JJfair
.12606SENT.
But12607CCbut
what12608WPwhat
the12609DTthe
Census12610NPCensus
Bureau12611NPBureau
recommended12612VVDrecommend
was12613VBDbe
that12614IN/thatthat
it12615PPit
could12616MDcould
develop12617VVdevelop
that12618IN/thatthat
block-level12619JJblock-level
data12620NNSdatum
either12621CCeither
with12622INwith
existing12623VVGexist
ACS12624NPACS
data12625NNSdatum
or12626CCor
using12627VVGuse
administrative12628JJadministrative
records12629NNSrecord
and12630CCand
that12631DTthat
that12632WDTthat
would12633MDwould
be12634VBbe
,12635,,
in12636INin
fact12637NNfact
,12638,,
the12639DTthe
best12640JJSgood
and12641CCand
most12642RBSmost
accurate12643JJaccurate
way12644NNway
to12645TOto
do12646VVdo
that12647DTthat
.12648SENT.
And12649CCand
...12650:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12651LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
So12652RBso
...12653:...
so12654RBso
the12655DTthe
states12656NNSstate
that12657WDTthat
said12658VVDsay
previously12659RBpreviously
that12660DTthat
was12661VBDbe
n't12662RBn't
enough12663RBenough
now12664RBnow
are12665VBPbe
going12666VVGgo
in12667INin
all12668DTall
future12669JJfuture
litigation12670NNlitigation
to12671TOto
bind12672VVbind
themselves12673PPthemselves
to12674TOto
accept12675VVaccept
that12676IN/thatthat
it12677PPit
is12678VBZbe
enough12679JJenough
?12680SENT?
[MR. HO]12681LOC[MR. HO]
Well12682UHWell
...12683:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12684LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Are12685VBPbe
you12686PPyou
prepared12687VVNprepare
to12688TOto
say12689VVsay
that12690DTthat
?12691SENT?
[MR. HO]12692LOC[MR. HO]
...12693:...
Justice12694NPJustice
Gorsuch12695NPGorsuch
,12696,,
we12697PPwe
've12698VHPhave
never12699RBnever
taken12700VVNtake
...12701:...
our12702PP$our
clients12703NNSclient
have12704VHPhave
never12705RBnever
taken12706VVNtake
that12707DTthat
position12708NNposition
,12709,,
and12710CCand
I12711PPI
...12712:...
I12713PPI
'm12714VBPbe
not12715RBnot
aware12716JJaware
of12717INof
my12718PP$my
organization12719NNorganization
ever12720RBever
taking12721VVGtake
that12722DTthat
position12723NNposition
in12724INin
litigation12725NNlitigation
.12726SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12727LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
And12728CCand
how12729JJhow
...12730:...
how12731WRBhow
about12732RBabout
the12733DTthe
underreporting12734VVGunderreport
or12735CCor
the12736DTthe
folks12737NNSfolk
who12738WPwho
stop12739VVstop
and12740CCand
break12741VVbreak
off12742RPoff
answering12743VVGanswer
the12744DTthe
long12745JJlong
form12746NNform
and12747CCand
...12748:...
and12749CCand
we12750PPwe
're12751VBPbe
asked12752VVNask
to12753TOto
believe12754VVbelieve
that12755IN/thatthat
that12756DTthat
's12757VBZbe
solely12758RBsolely
attributable12759JJattributable
to12760TOto
this12761DTthis
question12762NNquestion
?12763SENT?
We12764PPwe
have12765VHPhave
a12766DTa
whole12767JJwhole
bunch12768NNbunch
of12769INof
states12770NNSstate
that12771WDTthat
say12772VVPsay
that12773IN/thatthat
,12774,,
in12775INin
fact12776NNfact
,12777,,
the12778DTthe
break-off12779NNbreak-off
rate12780NNrate
because12781INbecause
of12782INof
that12783DTthat
question12784NNquestion
,12785,,
at12786INat
that12787DTthat
question12788NNquestion
,12789,,
is12790VBZbe
something12791NNsomething
like12792INlike
012793CD0
.12794SENT.
3612795CD@card@
percent12796NNpercent
.12797SENT.
[MR. HO]12798LOC[MR. HO]
Well12799UHWell
...12800:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12801LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
So12802RBso
that12803IN/thatthat
it12804PPit
's12805VBZbe
very12806RBvery
difficult12807JJdifficult
to12808TOto
understand12809VVunderstand
why12810WRBwhy
that12811DTthat
question12812NNquestion
would12813MDwould
be12814VBbe
the12815DTthe
cause12816NNcause
of12817INof
people12818NNSpeople
stopping12819VVGstop
answering12820NNanswering
,12821,,
whereas12822INwhereas
another12823DTanother
possible12824JJpossible
explanation12825NNexplanation
that12826WDTthat
has12827VHZhave
n't12828RBn't
been12829VBNbe
explored12830VVNexplore
,12831,,
as12832INas
I12833PPI
understand12834VVPunderstand
it12835PPit
at12836INat
least12837JJSleast
,12838,,
is12839VBZbe
the12840DTthe
length12841NNlength
of12842INof
the12843DTthe
form12844NNform
itself12845PPitself
may12846MDmay
deter12847VVdeter
those12848DTthose
with12849INwith
less12850JJRless
means12851NNSmean
and12852CCand
less12853JJRless
time12854NNtime
to12855TOto
fill12856VVfill
them12857PPthem
out12858RPout
,12859,,
just12860RBjust
as12861RBas
simple12862JJsimple
as12863INas
that12864DTthat
,12865,,
and12866CCand
we12867PPwe
do12868VVPdo
n't12869RBn't
know12870VVknow
.12871SENT.
And12872CCand
what12873WPwhat
do12874VVPdo
we12875PPwe
do12876VVPdo
with12877INwith
the12878DTthe
fact12879NNfact
that12880IN/thatthat
we12881PPwe
do12882VVPdo
n't12883RBn't
know12884VVknow
?12885SENT?
[MR. HO]12886LOC[MR. HO]
Justice12887NPJustice
Gorsuch12888NPGorsuch
,12889,,
the12890DTthe
Census12891NPCensus
Bureau12892NPBureau
's12893POS's
conclusion12894NNconclusion
was12895VBDbe
that12896IN/thatthat
the12897DTthe
most12898RBSmost
likely12899JJlikely
explanation12900NNexplanation
was12901VBDbe
the12902DTthe
citizenship12903NNcitizenship
question12904NNquestion
.12905SENT.
The12906DTthe
only12907JJonly
difference12908NNdifference
in12909INin
that12910DTthat
comparative12911JJcomparative
estimate12912NNestimate
was12913VBDbe
the12914DTthe
presence12915NNpresence
of12916INof
a12917DTa
non-citizen12918NNnon-citizen
in12919INin
a12920DTa
household12921NNhousehold
,12922,,
and12923CCand
citizenship12924NNcitizenship
is12925VBZbe
obviously12926RBobviously
the12927DTthe
most12928RBSmost
salient12929JJsalient
question12930NNquestion
that12931WDTthat
goes12932VVZgo
to12933TOto
the12934DTthe
difference12935NNdifference
between12936INbetween
those12937DTthose
two12938CDtwo
populations12939NNSpopulation
.12940SENT.
And12941CCand
the12942DTthe
number12943NNnumber
on12944INon
the12945DTthe
break-off12946NNbreak-off
rates12947NNSrate
for12948INfor
the12949DTthe
Internet12950NPInternet
ACS12951NPACS
survey12952NNsurvey
,12953,,
which12954WDTwhich
I12955PPI
believe12956VVPbelieve
Your12957PP$your
Honor12958NPHonor
was12959VBDbe
referring12960VVGrefer
to12961TOto
,12962,,
they12963PPthey
showed12964VVDshow
that12965IN/thatthat
Hispanics12966NNSHispanic
were12967VBDbe
actually12968RBactually
eight12969CDeight
times12970NNStime
as12971RBas
likely12972JJlikely
to12973TOto
break12974VVbreak
off12975RPoff
in12976INin
responding12977VVGrespond
to12978TOto
the12979DTthe
ACS12980NPACS
upon12981INupon
encountering12982VVGencounter
the12983DTthe
citizenship12984NNcitizenship
question12985NNquestion
.12986SENT.
Now12987RBnow
,12988,,
by12989INby
contrast12990NNcontrast
,12991,,
there12992EXthere
is12993VBZbe
n't12994RBn't
a12995DTa
shred12996NNshred
of12997INof
evidence12998NNevidence
in12999INin
the13000DTthe
administrative13001JJadministrative
record13002NNrecord
that13003WDTthat
suggests13004VVZsuggest
that13005IN/thatthat
this13006DTthis
question13007NNquestion
will13008MDwill
not13009RBnot
have13010VHhave
the13011DTthe
effect13012NNeffect
of13013INof
harming13014VVGharm
response13015NNresponse
rates13016NNSrate
or13017CCor
will13018MDwill
actually13019RBactually
improve13020VVimprove
the13021DTthe
citizenship13022NNcitizenship
data13023NNSdatum
provided13024VVDprovide
to13025TOto
the13026DTthe
Department13027NPDepartment
of13028INof
Justice13029NPJustice
.13030SENT.
But13031CCbut
if13032INif
I13033PPI
could13034MDcould
make13035VVmake
one13036CDone
other13037JJother
point13038NNpoint
in13039INin
response13040NNresponse
to13041TOto
your13042PP$your
earlier13043JJRearly
question13044NNquestion
,13045,,
Justice13046NPJustice
Gorsuch13047NPGorsuch
,13048,,
adding13049VVGadd
the13050DTthe
citizenship13051NNcitizenship
question13052NNquestion
does13053VVZdo
n't13054RBn't
even13055RBeven
solve13056VVsolve
that13057DTthat
granularity13058NNgranularity
problem13059NNproblem
that13060IN/thatthat
you13061PPyou
referenced13062VVDreference
,13063,,
and13064CCand
here13065RBhere
's13066VBZbe
why13067WRBwhy
:13068::
Because13069INbecause
the13070DTthe
Census13071NPCensus
Bureau13072NPBureau
can13073MDcan
only13074RBonly
produce13075VVproduce
estimates13076NNSestimate
of13077INof
citizenship13078NNcitizenship
at13079INat
the13080DTthe
block13081NNblock
level13082NNlevel
.13083SENT.
The13084DTthe
government13085NNgovernment
has13086VHZhave
now13087RBnow
conceded13088VVNconcede
that13089IN/thatthat
on13090INon
page13091NNpage
1813092CD@card@
of13093INof
their13094PP$their
reply13095NNreply
brief13096NNbrief
,13097,,
which13098WDTwhich
is13099VBZbe
quite13100RBquite
remarkable13101JJremarkable
,13102,,
because13103INbecause
the13104DTthe
government13105NNgovernment
's13106POS's
rationale13107NNrationale
for13108INfor
asking13109VVGask
this13110DTthis
question13111NNquestion
has13112VHZhave
been13113VBNbe
to13114TOto
provide13115VVprovide
a13116DTa
full13117JJfull
count13118NNcount
of13119INof
citizenship13120NNcitizenship
.13121SENT.
And13122CCand
because13123INbecause
of13124INof
the13125DTthe
Census13126NPCensus
Bureau13127NPBureau
's13128POS's
disclosure13129NNdisclosure
avoidance13130NNavoidance
protocols13131NNSprotocol
,13132,,
it13133PPit
actually13134RBactually
can13135MDcan
't13136RB't
do13137VVPdo
that13138IN/thatthat
at13139INat
the13140DTthe
block13141NNblock
level13142NNlevel
.13143SENT.
It13144PPit
undermines13145VVZundermine
the13146DTthe
whole13147JJwhole
rationale13148NNrationale
for13149INfor
adding13150VVGadd
this13151DTthis
question13152NNquestion
,13153,,
and13154CCand
the13155DTthe
Secretary13156NPSecretary
did13157VVDdo
n't13158RBn't
even13159RBeven
address13160VVaddress
it13161PPit
in13162INin
his13163PP$his
decisional13164JJdecisional
memo13165NNmemo
,13166,,
which13167WDTwhich
renders13168VVZrender
his13169PP$his
decision13170NNdecision
arbitrary13171JJarbitrary
and13172CCand
capricious13173JJcapricious
under13174INunder
State13175NPState
Farm13176NPFarm
.13177SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13178LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
It13179PPit
seems13180VVZseem
to13181TOto
me13182PPme
...13183:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]13184LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So13185RBso
...13186:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13187LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Go13188VVgo
ahead13189RBahead
.13190SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]13191LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...13192:...
I13193PPI
was13194VBDbe
just13195RBjust
...13196:...
what13197WPwhat
is13198VBZbe
the13199DTthe
"13200``"
it13201PPit
"13202''"
in13203INin
that13204DTthat
sentence13205NNsentence
?13206SENT?
What13207WPWhat
did13208VVDdo
the13209DTthe
Secretary13210NPSecretary
not13211RBnot
address13212VVaddress
?13213SENT?
[MR. HO]13214LOC[MR. HO]
He13215PPhe
did13216VVDdo
not13217RBnot
address13218VVaddress
the13219DTthe
fact13220NNfact
that13221IN/thatthat
because13222INbecause
of13223INof
the13224DTthe
bureau13225NNbureau
's13226POS's
disclosure13227NNdisclosure
avoidance13228NNavoidance
protocols13229NNSprotocol
,13230,,
it13231PPit
can13232MDcan
only13233RBonly
provide13234VVprovide
estimates13235NNSestimate
of13236INof
citizenship13237NNcitizenship
at13238INat
the13239DTthe
block13240NNblock
level13241NNlevel
.13242SENT.
If13243INif
I13244PPI
could13245MDcould
,13246,,
let13247VVlet
me13248PPme
explain13249VVexplain
why13250WRBwhy
.13251SENT.
The13252DTthe
statute13253NNstatute
requires13254VVZrequire
the13255DTthe
Census13256NPCensus
Bureau13257NPBureau
not13258RBnot
to13259TOto
disclose13260VVdisclose
information13261NNinformation
that13262WDTthat
could13263MDcould
result13264VVresult
in13265INin
the13266DTthe
identification13267NNidentification
of13268INof
a13269DTa
person13270NNperson
's13271POS's
census13272NNcensus
responses13273NNSresponse
.13274SENT.
If13275INif
you13276PPyou
have13277VHPhave
10013278CD@card@
people13279NNSpeople
living13280VVGlive
on13281INon
a13282DTa
block13283NNblock
and13284CCand
the13285DTthe
Census13286NPCensus
Bureau13287NPBureau
says13288VVZsay
,13289,,
well13290RBwell
,13291,,
there13292EXthere
are13293VBPbe
10013294CD@card@
citizens13295NNScitizen
there13296RBthere
,13297,,
you13298PPyou
will13299MDwill
have13300VHhave
necessarily13301RBnecessarily
identified13302VVNidentify
all13303DTall
of13304INof
their13305PP$their
census13306NNcensus
responses13307NNSresponse
.13308SENT.
So13309RBso
what13310WPwhat
the13311DTthe
bureau13312NNbureau
does13313VVZdo
is13314VBZbe
it13315PPit
alters13316VVZalter
demographic13317JJdemographic
totals13318NNStotal
for13319INfor
census13320NNcensus
blocks13321NNSblock
before13322INbefore
publishing13323VVGpublish
them13324PPthem
.13325SENT.
That13326DTthat
means13327VVZmean
that13328IN/thatthat
that13329DTthat
data13330NNdata
is13331VBZbe
an13332DTan
approximation13333NNapproximation
,13334,,
it13335PPit
's13336VBZbe
an13337DTan
estimate13338NNestimate
,13339,,
just13340RBjust
like13341INlike
the13342DTthe
ACS13343NPACS
data13344NNSdatum
that13345IN/thatthat
the13346DTthe
Department13347NPDepartment
of13348INof
Justice13349NPJustice
currently13350RBcurrently
relies13351VVZrely
on13352INon
.13353SENT.
And13354CCand
here13355RBhere
's13356VBZbe
what13357WPwhat
's13358VBZbe
critical13359JJcritical
.13360SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]13361LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well13362UHWell
,13363,,
this13364DTthis
is13365VBZbe
...13366:...
this13367DTthis
gets13368VVZget
really13369RBreally
,13370,,
really13371RBreally
technical13372JJtechnical
,13373,,
but13374CCbut
...13375:...
well13376RBwell
,13377,,
and13378CCand
your13379PP$your
...13380:...
I13381PPI
'm13382VBPbe
sorry13383JJsorry
.13384SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13385LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
No13386NPNo
,13387,,
go13388VVPgo
ahead13389RBahead
.13390SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]13391LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
That's13392NPThat's
...13393:...
that13394WDTthat
's13395VBZbe
fine13396JJfine
.13397SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13398LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Okay13399NPOkay
.13400SENT.
Thank13401VVthank
you13402PPyou
,13403,,
counsel13404NNcounsel
.13405SENT.
[MR. HO]13406LOC[MR. HO]
Thank13407VVthank
you13408PPyou
,13409,,
Your13410PP$your
Honors13411NNShonors
.13412SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13413LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Mr13414NPMr
.13415SENT.
Letter13416NNletter
.13417SENT.
[MR. LETTER]13418LOC[MR. LETTER]
Mr13419NPMr
.13420SENT.
Chief13421NPChief
Justice13422NPJustice
,13423,,
and13424CCand
may13425MDmay
it13426PPit
please13427VVplease
the13428DTthe
Court13429NPCourt
:13430::
I13431PPI
just13432RBjust
want13433VVPwant
to13434TOto
say13435VVsay
right13436JJright
upfront13437NNupfront
the13438DTthe
Speaker13439NPSpeaker
of13440INof
the13441DTthe
House13442NPHouse
wishes13443VVZwish
to13444TOto
thank13445VVthank
the13446DTthe
Justices13447NPSJustices
for13448INfor
their13449PP$their
courtesy13450NNcourtesy
in13451INin
hearing13452NNhearing
from13453INfrom
the13454DTthe
House13455NPHouse
today13456NNtoday
.13457SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13458LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Tell13459VVtell
her13460PPher
she13461PPshe
's13462VBZbe
welcome13463JJwelcome
.13464SENT.
[13465SYM[
LAUGHTER13466NNlaughter
]13467SYM]
[MR. LETTER]13468LOC[MR. LETTER]
Thank13469VVthank
you13470PPyou
.13471SENT.
I13472PPI
'll13473MDwill
pass13474VVpass
that13475IN/thatthat
along13476INalong
to13477TOto
her13478PPher
,13479,,
Mr13480NPMr
.13481SENT.
Chief13482NPChief
Justice13483NPJustice
.13484SENT.
I13485PPI
want13486VVPwant
to13487TOto
hit13488VVhit
just13489RBjust
a13490DTa
couple13491NNcouple
of13492INof
points13493NNSpoint
,13494,,
but13495CCbut
one13496CDone
of13497INof
the13498DTthe
ones13499NNSone
I13500PPI
want13501VVPwant
to13502TOto
hit13503VVhit
right13504JJright
upfront13505NNupfront
is13506VBZbe
something13507NNsomething
that13508WDTthat
...13509:...
that13510IN/thatthat
General13511NPGeneral
Underwood13512NPUnderwood
said13513VVDsay
and13514CCand
I13515PPI
think13516VVPthink
bears13517VVZbear
some13518DTsome
emphasis13519NNemphasis
,13520,,
which13521WDTwhich
is13522VBZbe
the13523DTthe
...13524:...
remember13525VVPremember
that13526IN/thatthat
the13527DTthe
...13528:...
the13529DTthe
census13530NNcensus
that13531IN/thatthat
we13532PPwe
're13533VBPbe
talking13534VVGtalk
about13535RBabout
here13536RBhere
is13537VBZbe
the13538DTthe
decennial13539JJdecennial
census13540NNcensus
provided13541VVNprovide
for13542INfor
in13543INin
the13544DTthe
Constitution13545NPConstitution
,13546,,
of13547INof
utmost13548JJutmost
importance13549NNimportance
to13550TOto
the13551DTthe
House13552NPHouse
of13553INof
Representatives13554NPSRepresentatives
.13555SENT.
That13556DTthat
provision13557NNprovision
obviously13558RBobviously
is13559VBZbe
the13560DTthe
ground13561NNground
...13562:...
has13563VHZhave
to13564TOto
be13565VBbe
the13566DTthe
grounding13567NNgrounding
for13568INfor
the13569DTthe
statute13570NNstatute
that13571WDTthat
is13572VBZbe
being13573VBGbe
applied13574VVNapply
here13575RBhere
.13576SENT.
And13577CCand
so13578INso
anything13579NNanything
that13580WDTthat
undermines13581VVZundermine
the13582DTthe
accuracy13583NNaccuracy
of13584INof
the13585DTthe
actual13586JJactual
enumeration13587NNenumeration
is13588VBZbe
immediately13589RBimmediately
a13590DTa
problem13591NNproblem
.13592SENT.
So13593RBso
there13594EXthere
's13595VHZhave
been13596VBNbe
a13597DTa
lot13598NNlot
of13599INof
discussion13600NNdiscussion
here13601RBhere
,13602,,
quite13603RBquite
properly13604RBproperly
,13605,,
because13606INbecause
of13607INof
the13608DTthe
way13609NNway
this13610DTthis
case13611NNcase
has13612VHZhave
been13613VBNbe
briefed13614VVNbrief
,13615,,
about13616RBabout
will13617MDwill
this13618RBthis
help13619VVhelp
the13620DTthe
Justice13621NPJustice
Department13622NPDepartment
and13623CCand
the13624DTthe
Voting13625NPVoting
Rights13626NPSRights
Act13627NPAct
,13628,,
et13629NPet
cetera13630NPcetera
.13631SENT.
And13632CCand
that13633WDTthat
may13634MDmay
be13635VBbe
a13636DTa
very13637RBvery
important13638JJimportant
point13639NNpoint
,13640,,
but13641CCbut
it13642PPit
is13643VBZbe
not13644RBnot
why13645WRBwhy
the13646DTthe
Census13647NPCensus
Bureau13648NPBureau
carries13649VVZcarry
out13650RPout
an13651DTan
actual13652JJactual
enumeration13653NNenumeration
,13654,,
which13655WDTwhich
goes13656VVZgo
to13657TOto
the13658DTthe
apportionment13659NNapportionment
of13660INof
representatives13661NNSrepresentative
among13662INamong
the13663DTthe
states13664NNSstate
and13665CCand
then13666RBthen
distribution13667NNdistribution
within13668INwithin
the13669DTthe
states13670NNSstate
.13671SENT.
So13672RBso
,13673,,
if13674INif
there13675EXthere
is13676VBZbe
something13677NNsomething
that13678WDTthat
undermines13679VVZundermine
the13680DTthe
accuracy13681NNaccuracy
of13682INof
that13683DTthat
count13684NNcount
,13685,,
even13686RBeven
if13687INif
it13688PPit
's13689VBZbe
important13690JJimportant
for13691INfor
other13692JJother
reasons13693NNSreason
,13694,,
that13695WDTthat
is13696VBZbe
both13697CCboth
a13698DTa
statutory13699JJstatutory
violation13700NNviolation
and13701CCand
,13702,,
therefore13703RBtherefore
,13704,,
a13705DTa
violation13706NNviolation
of13707INof
the13708DTthe
Administrative13709NPAdministrative
Procedure13710NPProcedure
Act13711NPAct
,13712,,
and13713CCand
a13714DTa
constitutional13715JJconstitutional
violation13716NNviolation
.13717SENT.
Now13718RBnow
this13719DTthis
Court13720NPCourt
does13721VVZdo
not13722RBnot
have13723VHhave
to13724TOto
reach13725VVreach
the13726DTthe
constitutional13727JJconstitutional
question13728NNquestion
because13729INbecause
it13730PPit
is13731VBZbe
a13732DTa
statutory13733JJstatutory
violation13734NNviolation
.13735SENT.
I13736PPI
...13737:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]13738LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But13739CCbut
do13740VVPdo
you13741PPyou
think13742VVPthink
that13743IN/thatthat
any13744DTany
decrease13745NNdecrease
in13746INin
the13747DTthe
actual13748JJactual
count13749NNcount
,13750,,
if13751INif
...13752:...
if13753INif
you13754PPyou
add13755VVPadd
any13756DTany
question13757NNquestion
beyond13758INbeyond
counting13759VVGcount
people13760NNSpeople
,13761,,
and13762CCand
that13763WDTthat
decreases13764VVZdecrease
the13765DTthe
actual13766JJactual
count13767NNcount
to13768TOto
any13769DTany
degree13770NNdegree
,13771,,
then13772RBthen
that13773DTthat
additional13774JJadditional
question13775NNquestion
is13776VBZbe
improper13777JJimproper
?13778SENT?
[MR. LETTER]13779LOC[MR. LETTER]
Justice13780NPJustice
Alito13781NPAlito
,13782,,
I13783PPI
...13784:...
I13785PPI
'm13786VBPbe
sure13787RBsure
that13788RBthat
...13789:...
that13790IN/thatthat
the13791DTthe
Court13792NPCourt
would13793MDwould
find13794VVfind
there13795EXthere
's13796VBZbe
a13797DTa
de13798NPde
minimis13799NPminimis
exception13800NNexception
.13801SENT.
There13802EXthere
's13803VBZbe
no13804DTno
...13805:...
no13806DTno
doubt13807NNdoubt
about13808INabout
that13809DTthat
.13810SENT.
So13811RBso
where13812WRBwhere
this13813DTthis
Court13814NPCourt
would13815MDwould
draw13816VVdraw
that13817DTthat
line13818NNline
,13819,,
I13820PPI
do13821VVPdo
n't13822RBn't
know13823VVknow
.13824SENT.
What13825WPWhat
I13826PPI
...13827:...
I13828PPI
can13829MDcan
tell13830VVtell
you13831PPyou
,13832,,
and13833CCand
I'm13834NPI'm
...13835:...
I13836PPI
'm13837VBPbe
sure13838JJsure
you13839PPyou
know13840VVPknow
this13841DTthis
,13842,,
but13843CCbut
I13844PPI
'll13845MDwill
just13846RBjust
...13847:...
from13848INfrom
the13849DTthe
...13850:...
this13851DTthis
Court13852NPCourt
said13853VVDsay
in13854INin
the13855DTthe
Wisconsin13856NPWisconsin
case13857NNcase
that13858WDTthat
...13859:...
a13860DTa
question13861NNquestion
there13862EXthere
was13863VBDbe
could13864MDcould
a13865DTa
statistical13866JJstatistical
adjustment13867NNadjustment
be13868VBbe
made13869VVNmake
,13870,,
and13871CCand
this13872DTthis
Court13873NPCourt
set13874VVDset
the13875DTthe
standard13876NNstandard
of13877INof
what13878WPwhat
actual13879JJactual
enumeration13880NNenumeration
means13881NNSmean
and13882CCand
it13883PPit
says13884VVZsay
"13885``"
a13886DTa
reasonable13887JJreasonable
relationship13888NNrelationship
to13889TOto
the13890DTthe
accomplishment13891NNaccomplishment
of13892INof
an13893DTan
actual13894JJactual
enumeration13895NNenumeration
.13896SENT.
"13897''"
And13898CCand
this13899DTthis
discussion13900NNdiscussion
about13901INabout
the13902DTthe
importance13903NNimportance
of13904INof
voting13905VVGvote
rights13906NNSright
data13907NNSdatum
obviously13908RBobviously
does13909VVZdo
not13910RBnot
bear13911VVbear
a13912DTa
reasonable13913JJreasonable
relationship13914NNrelationship
to13915TOto
the13916DTthe
accomplishment13917NNaccomplishment
of13918INof
an13919DTan
actual13920JJactual
...13921:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]13922LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Mr13923NNMr
.13924SENT.
Letter13925NNletter
,13926,,
I13927PPI
'm13928VBPbe
sure13929JJsure
you13930PPyou
've13931VHPhave
given13932VVNgive
this13933DTthis
some13934RBsome
thought13935VVNthink
,13936,,
but13937CCbut
...13938:...
I13939PPI
know13940VVPknow
you13941PPyou
have13942VHPhave
.13943SENT.
In13944INin
terms13945NNSterm
of13946INof
assessing13947VVGassess
what13948WPwhat
a13949DTa
reasonable13950JJreasonable
relationship13951NNrelationship
is13952VBZbe
,13953,,
what13954WPwhat
do13955VVPdo
we13956PPwe
do13957VVPdo
with13958INwith
the13959DTthe
history13960NNhistory
and13961CCand
the13962DTthe
fact13963NNfact
that13964IN/thatthat
this13965DTthis
question13966NNquestion
has13967VHZhave
been13968VBNbe
on13969INon
for13970INfor
what13971WPwhat
a13972DTa
long13973JJlong
time13974NNtime
was13975VBDbe
the13976DTthe
only13977JJonly
form13978NNform
in13979INin
the13980DTthe
census13981NNcensus
through13982INthrough
almost13983RBalmost
all13984DTall
of13985INof
our13986PP$our
history13987NNhistory
,13988,,
and13989CCand
it13990PPit
continues13991VVZcontinue
to13992TOto
be13993VBbe
asked13994VVNask
today13995NNtoday
in13996INin
the13997DTthe
long13998JJlong
form13999NNform
or14000CCor
in14001INin
the14002DTthe
ACS14003NPACS
.14004SENT.
It14005PPit
's14006VBZbe
not14007RBnot
like14008INlike
this14009DTthis
question14010NNquestion
or14011CCor
anybody14012NNanybody
in14013INin
the14014DTthe
room14015NNroom
is14016VBZbe
suggesting14017VVGsuggest
that14018IN/thatthat
the14019DTthe
question14020NNquestion
is14021VBZbe
improper14022JJimproper
to14023TOto
ask14024VVask
in14025INin
some14026DTsome
way14027NNway
,14028,,
shape14029NNshape
,14030,,
or14031CCor
form14032NNform
.14033SENT.
And14034CCand
what14035WPwhat
we14036PPwe
do14037VVPdo
as14038RBas
well14039RBwell
with14040INwith
the14041DTthe
evidence14042NNevidence
of14043INof
practice14044NNpractice
around14045INaround
the14046DTthe
world14047NNworld
and14048CCand
virtually14049RBvirtually
every14050DTevery
English-speaking14051JJEnglish-speaking
country14052NNcountry
and14053CCand
a14054DTa
great14055JJgreat
many14056JJmany
others14057NNSother
besides14058RBbesides
ask14059VVPask
this14060DTthis
question14061NNquestion
in14062INin
their14063PP$their
censuses14064NNScensus
?14065SENT?
So14066RBso
I14067PPI
'm14068VBPbe
sure14069JJsure
you14070PPyou
've14071VHPhave
given14072VVNgive
consideration14073NNconsideration
...14074:...
thought14075NNthought
...14076:...
thoughtful14077JJthoughtful
consideration14078NNconsideration
to14079TOto
those14080DTthose
questions14081NNSquestion
.14082SENT.
[MR. LETTER]14083LOC[MR. LETTER]
Absolutely14084RBabsolutely
,14085,,
Your14086PP$your
Honor14087NPHonor
,14088,,
although14089INalthough
I14090PPI
can14091MDcan
tell14092VVtell
that14093IN/thatthat
you14094PPyou
also14095RBalso
have14096VHPhave
.14097SENT.
First14098JJfirst
of14099INof
all14100DTall
,14101,,
I14102PPI
do14103VVPdo
n't14104RBn't
know14105VVknow
if14106INif
the14107DTthe
other14108JJother
countries14109NNScountry
that14110WDTthat
are14111VBPbe
listed14112VVNlist
,14113,,
for14114INfor
instance14115NNinstance
,14116,,
in14117INin
the14118DTthe
...14119:...
the14120DTthe
U14121NPU
.14122SENT.
N14123NPN
.14124SENT.
recommendations14125NNSrecommendation
have14126VHPhave
an14127DTan
actual14128JJactual
Enumeration14129NNenumeration
Clause14130NNclause
written14131VVNwrite
into14132INinto
their14133PP$their
constitution14134NNconstitution
that14135WDTthat
is14136VBZbe
of14137INof
paramount14138JJparamount
importance14139NNimportance
.14140SENT.
So14141RBso
I14142PPI
'm14143VBPbe
not14144RBnot
sure14145JJsure
that14146IN/thatthat
,14147,,
when14148WRBwhen
...14149:...
when14150WRBwhen
the14151DTthe
U14152NPU
.14153SENT.
N14154NPN
.14155SENT.
made14156VVNmake
that14157DTthat
recommendation14158NNrecommendation
,14159,,
that14160IN/thatthat
that14161DTthat
matters14162NNSmatter
for14163INfor
the14164DTthe
United14165NPUnited
States14166NPSStates
.14167SENT.
Second14168RBsecond
,14169,,
Your14170PP$your
Honor14171NPHonor
,14172,,
the14173DTthe
...14174:...
if14175INif
...14176:...
there14177RBthere
...14178:...
there14179EXthere
are14180VBPbe
other14181JJother
factors14182NNSfactor
that14183WDTthat
would14184MDwould
undermine14185VVundermine
actual14186JJactual
enumeration14187NNenumeration
.14188SENT.
There14189EXthere
is14190VBZbe
no14191DTno
evidence14192NNevidence
in14193INin
the14194DTthe
record14195NNrecord
here14196RBhere
.14197SENT.
As14198INas
the14199DTthe
Chief14200NPChief
Justice14201NPJustice
pointed14202VVDpoint
out14203RPout
,14204,,
we14205PPwe
're14206VBPbe
dealing14207VVGdeal
with14208INwith
a14209DTa
record14210NNrecord
here14211RBhere
.14212SENT.
It14213PPit
may14214MDmay
be14215VBbe
that14216IN/thatthat
some14217DTsome
people14218NNSpeople
find14219VVPfind
questions14220NNSquestion
about14221RBabout
gender14222VVPgender
now14223RBnow
offensive14224JJoffensive
or14225CCor
maybe14226RBmaybe
in14227INin
the14228DTthe
future14229NNfuture
that14230WDTthat
will14231MDwill
be14232VBbe
deemed14233VVNdeem
offensive14234JJoffensive
and14235CCand
that14236WDTthat
would14237MDwould
undermine14238VVundermine
the14239DTthe
accuracy14240NNaccuracy
of14241INof
the14242DTthe
...14243:...
of14244INof
the14245DTthe
actual14246JJactual
enumeration14247NNenumeration
.14248SENT.
We14249PPwe
do14250VVPdo
n't14251RBn't
have14252VHhave
any14253DTany
evidence14254NNevidence
on14255INon
that14256DTthat
.14257SENT.
What14258WPWhat
we14259PPwe
do14260VVPdo
know14261VVknow
,14262,,
Your14263PP$your
Honor14264NPHonor
,14265,,
as14266INas
you14267PPyou
've14268VHPhave
quite14269RBquite
correctly14270RBcorrectly
pointed14271VVNpoint
out14272RPout
,14273,,
we14274PPwe
have14275VHPhave
a14276DTa
history14277NNhistory
of14278INof
this14279DTthis
,14280,,
but14281CCbut
what14282WPwhat
we14283PPwe
do14284VVPdo
know14285VVknow
now14286RBnow
is14287VBZbe
the14288DTthe
experts14289NNSexpert
right14290RBright
now14291RBnow
say14292VVPsay
that14293IN/thatthat
this14294DTthis
question14295NNquestion
,14296,,
if14297INif
it14298PPit
is14299VBZbe
put14300VVNput
on14301INon
the14302DTthe
...14303:...
the14304DTthe
form14305NNform
,14306,,
which14307WDTwhich
,14308,,
remember14309VVPremember
,14310,,
is14311VBZbe
the14312DTthe
only14313JJonly
form14314NNform
right14315RBright
now14316RBnow
for14317INfor
the14318DTthe
actual14319JJactual
enumeration14320NNenumeration
,14321,,
that14322WDTthat
will14323MDwill
cause14324VVcause
...14325:...
that14326WDTthat
will14327MDwill
make14328VVmake
the14329DTthe
undercount14330NNundercount
worse14331RBRworse
.14332SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]14333LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Mr14334NPMr
.14335SENT.
Letter14336NNletter
,14337,,
the14338NPthe
...14339:...
Congress14340NPCongress
has14341VHZhave
the14342DTthe
primary14343JJprimary
control14344NNcontrol
over14345INover
what14346WPwhat
the14347DTthe
census14348NNcensus
will14349MDwill
be14350VBbe
,14351,,
not14352RBnot
the14353DTthe
executive14354NNexecutive
,14355,,
and14356CCand
Congress14357NPCongress
has14358VHZhave
been14359VBNbe
alerted14360VVNalert
to14361TOto
this14362DTthis
citizenship14363NNcitizenship
question14364NNquestion
for14365INfor
some14366DTsome
time14367NNtime
,14368,,
and14369CCand
it14370PPit
has14371VHZhave
done14372VVNdo
nothing14373NNnothing
about14374INabout
it14375PPit
.14376SENT.
So14377RBso
one14378CDone
question14379NNquestion
is14380VBZbe
,14381,,
who14382WPwho
should14383MDshould
decide14384VVdecide
?14385SENT?
Congress14386NPCongress
is14387VBZbe
silent14388JJsilent
.14389SENT.
Should14390MDshould
the14391DTthe
Court14392NPCourt
then14393RBthen
step14394VVstep
in14395INin
?14396SENT?
[MR. LETTER]14397LOC[MR. LETTER]
It14398PPit
's14399VBZbe
a14400DTa
very14401RBvery
fair14402JJfair
question14403NNquestion
,14404,,
Your14405PP$your
Honor14406NPHonor
.14407SENT.
Two14408CDTwo
responses14409NNSresponse
.14410SENT.
One14411CDOne
,14412,,
I14413PPI
think14414VVPthink
that14415IN/thatthat
this14416DTthis
is14417VBZbe
a14418DTa
very14419RBvery
ironic14420JJironic
point14421NNpoint
for14422INfor
General14423NPGeneral
Francisco14424NPFrancisco
to14425TOto
be14426VBbe
making14427VVGmake
.14428SENT.
He14429PPhe
has14430VHZhave
said14431VVNsay
...14432:...
he14433PPhe
's14434VBZbe
emphasized14435VVNemphasize
in14436INin
his14437PP$his
brief14438JJbrief
Congress14439NPCongress
knows14440VVZknow
about14441INabout
this14442DTthis
,14443,,
Congress14444NPCongress
should14445MDshould
do14446VVdo
something14447NNsomething
.14448SENT.
This14449DTthis
...14450:...
the14451DTthe
Court14452NPCourt
can14453MDcan
take14454VVtake
judicial14455JJjudicial
notice14456NNnotice
of14457INof
this14458DTthis
because14459INbecause
it14460PPit
's14461VBZbe
in14462INin
the14463DTthe
public14464JJpublic
record14465NNrecord
.14466SENT.
The14467DTthe
Secretary14468NPSecretary
of14469INof
Commerce14470NPCommerce
has14471VHZhave
been14472VBNbe
called14473VVNcall
before14474INbefore
Congress14475NPCongress
to14476TOto
explain14477VVexplain
what14478WPwhat
he14479PPhe
did14480VVDdo
here14481RBhere
,14482,,
and14483CCand
Assistant14484NPAssistant
Attorney14485NPAttorney
General14486NPGeneral
Gore14487NPGore
,14488,,
the14489DTthe
one14490CDone
,14491,,
you14492PPyou
know14493VVPknow
,14494,,
about14495INabout
the14496DTthe
...14497:...
the14498DTthe
author14499NNauthor
of14500INof
the14501DTthe
...14502:...
the14503DTthe
request14504NNrequest
by14505INby
the14506DTthe
Justice14507NPJustice
Department14508NPDepartment
,14509,,
has14510VHZhave
been14511VBNbe
called14512VVNcall
to14513TOto
Congress14514NPCongress
.14515SENT.
They14516PPthey
have14517VHPhave
been14518VBNbe
declining14519VVGdecline
to14520TOto
answer14521VVanswer
.14522SENT.
They14523PPthey
're14524VBPbe
not14525RBnot
giving14526VVGgive
Congress14527NPCongress
the14528DTthe
information14529NNinformation
it14530PPit
requests14531VVZrequest
because14532INbecause
they14533PPthey
say14534VVPsay
there14535EXthere
's14536VBZbe
litigation14537NNlitigation
going14538VVGgo
on14539INon
.14540SENT.
And14541CCand
,14542,,
I14543PPI
repeat14544VVPrepeat
,14545,,
this14546DTthis
is14547VBZbe
a14548DTa
matter14549NNmatter
of14550INof
public14551JJpublic
record14552NNrecord
.14553SENT.
So14554RBso
it14555PPit
's14556VBZbe
ironic14557JJironic
for14558INfor
General14559NPGeneral
Francisco14560NPFrancisco
to14561TOto
be14562VBbe
saying14563VVGsay
:14564::
This14565DTthis
is14566VBZbe
for14567INfor
Congress14568NPCongress
.14569SENT.
Well14570UHwell
,14571,,
if14572INif
that14573WDTthat
's14574VBZbe
for14575INfor
Congress14576NPCongress
,14577,,
obviously14578RBobviously
,14579,,
the14580DTthe
House14581NPHouse
needs14582VVZneed
the14583DTthe
information14584NNinformation
.14585SENT.
And14586CCand
yet14587RByet
we14588PPwe
're14589VBPbe
being14590VBGbe
told14591VVNtell
we14592PPwe
can14593MDcan
't14594RB't
have14595VHhave
the14596DTthe
information14597NNinformation
because14598INbecause
it14599PPit
's14600VBZbe
...14601:...
because14602INbecause
it14603PPit
's14604VBZbe
only14605RBonly
for14606INfor
you14607PPyou
.14608SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]14609LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I14610PPI
thought14611VVDthink
all14612PDTall
the14613DTthe
information14614NNinformation
available14615JJavailable
,14616,,
as14617INas
I14618PPI
understand14619VVPunderstand
it14620PPit
,14621,,
leads14622VVZlead
to14623TOto
only14624RBonly
one14625CDone
answer14626NNanswer
,14627,,
and14628CCand
so14629RBso
why14630WRBwhy
is14631VBZbe
n't14632RBn't
that14633DTthat
answer14634NNanswer
sufficient14635JJsufficient
for14636INfor
them14637PPthem
to14638TOto
take14639VVtake
whatever14640WDTwhatever
action14641NNaction
they14642PPthey
consider14643VVPconsider
appropriate14644JJappropriate
?14645SENT?
[MR. LETTER]14646LOC[MR. LETTER]
The14647NPThe
...14648:...
I14649PPI
'm14650VBPbe
sorry14651JJsorry
,14652,,
Chief14653NPChief
Justice14654NPJustice
.14655SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]14656LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well14657UHwell
,14658,,
we14659PPwe
've14660VHPhave
been14661VBNbe
told14662VVNtell
there14663EXthere
was14664VBDbe
no14665DTno
basis14666NNbasis
for14667INfor
the14668DTthe
Secretary14669NPSecretary
to14670TOto
make14671VVmake
any14672DTany
decision14673NNdecision
,14674,,
other14675JJother
than14676INthan
the14677DTthe
recommendation14678NNrecommendation
that14679WDTthat
was14680VBDbe
submitted14681VVNsubmit
to14682TOto
him14683PPhim
by14684INby
the14685DTthe
bureau14686NNbureau
,14687,,
because14688INbecause
that14689WDTthat
's14690VBZbe
the14691DTthe
evidence14692NNevidence
.14693SENT.
That14694DTthat
's14695VBZbe
the14696DTthe
scientific14697JJscientific
evidence14698NNevidence
.14699SENT.
And14700CCand
so14701RBso
there14702EXthere
's14703VBZbe
no14704DTno
room14705NNroom
for14706INfor
the14707DTthe
exercise14708NNexercise
of14709INof
any14710DTany
discretion14711NNdiscretion
.14712SENT.
So14713RBso
what14714WPwhat
information14715NNinformation
...14716:...
what14717WPwhat
more14718JJRmore
information14719NNinformation
does14720VVZdo
the14721DTthe
Congress14722NPCongress
need14723VVPneed
to14724TOto
address14725VVaddress
the14726DTthe
problem14727NNproblem
?14728SENT?
[MR. LETTER]14729LOC[MR. LETTER]
We14730PPwe
want14731VVPwant
to14732TOto
know14733VVknow
what14734WPwhat
...14735:...
you14736PPyou
...14737:...
you14738PPyou
decided14739VVDdecide
otherwise14740RBotherwise
.14741SENT.
Why14742WRBwhy
did14743VVDdo
you14744PPyou
decide14745VVPdecide
?14746SENT?
As14747INas
we14748PPwe
know14749VVPknow
,14750,,
his14751PP$his
...14752:...
his14753PP$his
...14754:...
his14755PP$his
letter14756NNletter
provides14757VVZprovide
not14758RBnot
...14759:...
his14760PP$his
memo14761NNmemo
provides14762VVZprovide
not14763RBnot
much14764JJmuch
information14765NNinformation
.14766SENT.
This14767DTthis
...14768:...
the14769DTthe
Justices14770NPSJustices
here14771RBhere
today14772NNtoday
have14773VHPhave
been14774VBNbe
asking14775VVGask
these14776DTthese
key14777JJkey
questions14778NNSquestion
.14779SENT.
So14780RBso
we14781PPwe
want14782VVPwant
to14783TOto
know14784VVknow
,14785,,
what14786WPwhat
made14787VVDmake
you14788PPyou
do14789VVPdo
...14790:...
what14791WPwhat
made14792VVDmake
you14793PPyou
decide14794VVPdecide
this14795DTthis
?14796SENT?
Was14797VBDbe
this14798DTthis
just14799RBjust
a14800DTa
political14801JJpolitical
decision14802NNdecision
?14803SENT?
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]14804LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well14805UHwell
,14806,,
I14807PPI
thought14808VVDthink
Justice14809NPJustice
Ginsburg14810NPGinsburg
's14811POS's
question14812NNquestion
went14813VVDgo
more14814RBRmore
to14815TOto
why14816WRBwhy
does14817VVZdo
n't14818RBn't
Congress14819NPCongress
prohibit14820VVPprohibit
the14821DTthe
asking14822NNasking
of14823INof
a14824DTa
citizenship14825NNcitizenship
question14826NNquestion
in14827INin
the14828DTthe
same14829JJsame
way14830NNway
that14831IN/thatthat
Congress14832NPCongress
has14833VHZhave
explicitly14834RBexplicitly
provided14835VVNprovide
that14836IN/thatthat
no14837DTno
one14838CDone
can14839MDcan
be14840VBbe
compelled14841VVNcompel
to14842TOto
provide14843VVprovide
religious14844JJreligious
information14845NNinformation
?14846SENT?
[MR. LETTER]14847LOC[MR. LETTER]
Right14848RBright
.14849SENT.
And14850CCand
so14851RBso
that14852WDTthat
is14853VBZbe
something14854NNsomething
that14855IN/thatthat
Congress14856NPCongress
could14857MDcould
attempt14858VVattempt
to14859TOto
do14860VVdo
,14861,,
yes14862UHyes
,14863,,
and14864CCand
that14865DTthat
is14866VBZbe
one14867CDone
of14868INof
the14869DTthe
things14870NNSthing
that14871WDTthat
would14872MDwould
be14873VBbe
...14874:...
would14875MDwould
be14876VBbe
asked14877VVNask
about14878RBabout
.14879SENT.
But14880CCbut
,14881,,
as14882INas
we14883PPwe
know14884VVPknow
,14885,,
that14886WDTthat
does14887VVZdo
n't14888RBn't
stop14889VVstop
this14890DTthis
Court14891NPCourt
from14892INfrom
interpreting14893VVGinterpret
the14894DTthe
statute14895NNstatute
and14896CCand
the14897DTthe
Constitution14898NPConstitution
.14899SENT.
As14900INas
we14901PPwe
know14902VVPknow
,14903,,
this14904DTthis
Court14905NPCourt
is14906VBZbe
the14907DTthe
final14908JJfinal
word14909NNword
on14910INon
the14911DTthe
Constitution14912NPConstitution
.14913SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]14914LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
On14915INon
the14916DTthe
...14917:...
on14918INon
the14919DTthe
statute14920NNstatute
,14921,,
I14922PPI
had14923VHDhave
one14924CDone
question14925NNquestion
,14926,,
which14927WDTwhich
is14928VBZbe
you14929PPyou
make14930VVPmake
a14931DTa
good14932JJgood
first14933JJfirst
principles14934NNSprinciple
point14935NNpoint
about14936INabout
enumeration14937NNenumeration
being14938VBGbe
the14939DTthe
purpose14940NNpurpose
of14941INof
the14942DTthe
census14943NNcensus
.14944SENT.
But14945CCbut
it14946PPit
turns14947VVZturn
out14948RPout
that14949IN/thatthat
the14950DTthe
census14951NNcensus
,14952,,
as14953INas
you14954PPyou
know14955VVPknow
,14956,,
has14957VHZhave
been14958VBNbe
used14959VVNuse
for14960INfor
lots14961NNSlot
of14962INof
other14963JJother
statistical14964JJstatistical
and14965CCand
demographic14966JJdemographic
collection14967NNcollection
purposes14968NNSpurpose
throughout14969INthroughout
...14970:...
throughout14971INthroughout
our14972PP$our
history14973NNhistory
.14974SENT.
So14975RBso
it14976PPit
's14977VBZbe
not14978RBnot
just14979RBjust
for14980INfor
enumeration14981NNenumeration
.14982SENT.
And14983CCand
the14984DTthe
statute14985NNstatute
that14986IN/thatthat
Congress14987NPCongress
has14988VHZhave
passed14989VVNpass
gives14990VVZgive
huge14991JJhuge
discretion14992NNdiscretion
to14993TOto
the14994DTthe
Secretary14995NPSecretary
how14996WRBhow
to14997TOto
fill14998VVfill
out14999RPout
the15000DTthe
form15001NNform
,15002,,
what15003WPwhat
to15004TOto
put15005VVput
on15006INon
the15007DTthe
form15008NNform
.15009SENT.
So15010RBso
how15011WRBhow
are15012VBPbe
we15013PPwe
to15014TOto
think15015VVthink
about15016INabout
enumeration15017NNenumeration
when15018WRBwhen
the15019DTthe
history15020NNhistory
and15021CCand
the15022DTthe
statute15023NNstatute
suggests15024VVZsuggest
that15025IN/thatthat
there15026EXthere
is15027VBZbe
more15028JJRmore
than15029INthan
just15030RBjust
enumeration15031NNenumeration
that15032WDTthat
's15033VBZbe
at15034INat
stake15035NNstake
here15036RBhere
?15037SENT?
[MR. LETTER]15038LOC[MR. LETTER]
Your15039PP$your
Honor15040NPHonor
is15041VBZbe
exactly15042RBexactly
right15043JJright
.15044SENT.
The15045DTthe
...15046:...
the15047DTthe
census15048NNcensus
information15049NNinformation
,15050,,
the15051DTthe
census15052NNcensus
data15053NNSdatum
,15054,,
are15055VBPbe
used15056VVNuse
for15057INfor
all15058DTall
sorts15059NNSsort
of15060INof
things15061NNSthing
that15062WDTthat
are15063VBPbe
very15064RBvery
important15065JJimportant
.15066SENT.
Remember15067VVremember
,15068,,
the15069DTthe
Census15070NPCensus
Bureau15071NPBureau
does15072VVZdo
things15073NNSthing
way15074NNway
beyond15075INbeyond
just15076RBjust
the15077DTthe
decennial15078JJdecennial
census15079NNcensus
actual15080JJactual
enumeration15081NNenumeration
.15082SENT.
But15083CCbut
,15084,,
again15085RBagain
,15086,,
this15087DTthis
Court15088NPCourt
was15089VBDbe
very15090RBvery
clear15091JJclear
,15092,,
and15093CCand
...15094:...
and15095CCand
,15096,,
by15097INby
the15098DTthe
way15099NNway
,15100,,
the15101DTthe
other15102JJother
thing15103NNthing
is15104VBZbe
General15105NPGeneral
Francisco15106NPFrancisco
has15107VHZhave
argued15108VVNargue
no15109DTno
review15110NNreview
.15111SENT.
This15112DTthis
Court15113NPCourt
has15114VHZhave
reviewed15115VVNreview
how15116WRBhow
the15117DTthe
actual15118JJactual
enumeration15119NNenumeration
has15120VHZhave
taken15121VVNtake
place15122NNplace
,15123,,
I15124PPI
think15125VVPthink
,15126,,
about15127RBabout
five15128CDfive
times15129NNStime
.15130SENT.
So15131RBso
there15132EXthere
's15133VBZbe
clearly15134RBclearly
judicial15135JJjudicial
review15136NNreview
here15137RBhere
.15138SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15139LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well15140UHWell
,15141,,
assuming15142VVGassume
there15143EXthere
is15144VBZbe
review15145NNreview
and15146CCand
assuming15147VVGassume
it15148PPit
's15149VBZbe
arbitrary15150JJarbitrary
and15151CCand
capricious15152JJcapricious
,15153,,
as15154INas
you15155PPyou
know15156VVPknow
,15157,,
it15158PPit
's15159VBZbe
deferential15160JJdeferential
.15161SENT.
[MR. LETTER]15162LOC[MR. LETTER]
Yes15163NPYes
.15164SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15165LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And15166CCand
the15167DTthe
question15168NNquestion
I15169PPI
think15170VVPthink
here15171RBhere
is15172VBZbe
a15173DTa
policy15174NNpolicy
judgment15175NNjudgment
that15176IN/thatthat
it15177PPit
's15178VBZbe
more15179RBRmore
important15180JJimportant
to15181TOto
get15182VVget
accurate15183JJaccurate
citizenship15184NNcitizenship
information15185NNinformation
even15186RBeven
at15187INat
the15188DTthe
expense15189NNexpense
,15190,,
potentially15191RBpotentially
,15192,,
of15193INof
a15194DTa
slight15195JJslight
decrease15196NNdecrease
,15197,,
potentially15198RBpotentially
,15199,,
in15200INin
response15201NNresponse
rates15202NNSrate
.15203SENT.
And15204CCand
the15205DTthe
question15206NNquestion
is15207VBZbe
:15208::
Given15209VVNgive
the15210DTthe
statutes15211NNSstatute
,15212,,
why15213WRBwhy
does15214VVZdo
that15215IN/thatthat
judgment15216NNjudgment
fall15217NNfall
below15218INbelow
the15219DTthe
standard15220NNstandard
of15221INof
reasonableness15222NNreasonableness
in15223INin
assessing15224VVGassess
the15225DTthe
different15226JJdifferent
policy15227NNpolicy
considerations15228NNSconsideration
?15229SENT?
[MR. LETTER]15230LOC[MR. LETTER]
Our15231PP$our
position15232NNposition
is15233VBZbe
that15234IN/thatthat
,15235,,
one15236CDone
,15237,,
the15238DTthe
Justice15239NPJustice
Department15240NPDepartment
can15241MDcan
get15242VVget
this15243DTthis
information15244NNinformation
elsewhere15245RBelsewhere
,15246,,
as15247INas
we15248PPwe
know15249VVPknow
.15250SENT.
But15251CCbut
,15252,,
two15253CDtwo
,15254,,
you15255PPyou
can15256MDcan
't15257RB't
undermine15258VVundermine
the15259DTthe
accuracy15260NNaccuracy
of15261INof
the15262DTthe
actual15263JJactual
enumeration15264NNenumeration
in15265INin
order15266NNorder
to15267TOto
get15268VVget
information15269NNinformation
...15270:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15271LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
So15272RBso
...15273:...
[MR. LETTER]15274LOC[MR. LETTER]
...15275:...
for15276INfor
the15277DTthe
Voting15278NPVoting
Rights15279NPSRights
Act15280NPAct
.15281SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15282LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...15283:...
the15284DTthe
constitutional15285JJconstitutional
backdrop15286NNbackdrop
,15287,,
I15288PPI
think15289VVPthink
,15290,,
if15291INif
I15292PPI
'm15293VBPbe
translating15294VVGtranslate
your15295PP$your
argument15296NNargument
,15297,,
means15298VVZmean
that15299IN/thatthat
anything15300NNanything
that15301WDTthat
would15302MDwould
undermine15303VVundermine
the15304DTthe
enumeration15305NNenumeration
is15306VBZbe
impermissible15307JJimpermissible
and15308CCand
unreasonable15309JJunreasonable
?15310SENT?
[MR. LETTER]15311LOC[MR. LETTER]
I15312PPI
believe15313VVPbelieve
so15314RBso
,15315,,
Your15316PP$your
Honor15317NPHonor
.15318SENT.
And15319CCand
the15320DTthe
only15321JJonly
thing15322NNthing
...15323:...
the15324DTthe
only15325JJonly
addition15326NNaddition
I15327PPI
would15328MDwould
make15329VVmake
to15330TOto
that15331DTthat
is15332VBZbe
,15333,,
as15334INas
I15335PPI
said15336VVDsay
to15337TOto
Justice15338NPJustice
Alito15339NPAlito
,15340,,
undoubtedly15341RBundoubtedly
,15342,,
there15343EXthere
's15344VBZbe
a15345DTa
de15346NPde
minimis15347NPminimis
determination15348NNdetermination
.15349SENT.
But15350CCbut
,15351,,
again15352RBagain
,15353,,
this15354DTthis
Court15355NNcourt
is15356VBZbe
...15357:...
this15358DTthis
Court15359NPCourt
is15360VBZbe
the15361DTthe
expert15362NNexpert
on15363INon
the15364DTthe
Constitution15365NPConstitution
.15366SENT.
Thank15367VVthank
you15368PPyou
,15369,,
Your15370PP$your
Honor15371NPHonor
.15372SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]15373LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank15374VVthank
you15375PPyou
,15376,,
counsel15377NNcounsel
.15378SENT.
Four15379CDFour
minutes15380NNSminute
,15381,,
General15382NPGeneral
Francisco15383NPFrancisco
.15384SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]15385LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Mr15386NPMr
.15387SENT.
Chief15388NPChief
Justice15389NPJustice
,15390,,
thank15391VVPthank
you15392PPyou
.15393SENT.
I15394PPI
'd15395MDwould
like15396VVlike
to15397TOto
make15398VVmake
four15399CDfour
points15400NNSpoint
:15401::
First15402RBfirst
,15403,,
on15404INon
the15405DTthe
disclosure15406NNdisclosure
avoidance15407NNavoidance
protocols15408NNSprotocol
,15409,,
we15410PPwe
discussed15411VVDdiscuss
those15412DTthose
at15413INat
our15414PP$our
reply15415NNreply
brief15416NNbrief
at15417INat
page15418NNpage
1715419CD@card@
.15420SENT.
The15421DTthe
bottom15422JJbottom
line15423NNline
is15424VBZbe
that15425IN/thatthat
those15426DTthose
protocols15427NNSprotocol
apply15428VVPapply
to15429TOto
all15430DTall
census15431NNcensus
data15432NNSdatum
,15433,,
including15434VVGinclude
on15435INon
sex15436NNsex
,15437,,
on15438INon
age15439NNage
,15440,,
on15441INon
race15442NNrace
,15443,,
that15444IN/thatthat
the15445DTthe
Department15446NPDepartment
of15447INof
Justice15448NPJustice
uses15449VVZuse
to15450TOto
construct15451VVconstruct
citizen15452NNcitizen
voting15453NNvoting
age15454NNage
population15455NNpopulation
.15456SENT.
It15457PPit
's15458VHZhave
never15459RBnever
been15460VBNbe
a15461DTa
problem15462NNproblem
before15463RBbefore
.15464SENT.
There15465EXthere
's15466VBZbe
no15467DTno
reason15468NNreason
to15469TOto
think15470VVthink
it15471PPit
'll15472MDwill
be15473VBbe
a15474DTa
problem15475NNproblem
now15476RBnow
.15477SENT.
And15478CCand
I15479PPI
...15480:...
in15481INin
fact15482NNfact
,15483,,
I15484PPI
think15485VVPthink
in15486INin
the15487DTthe
trial15488NNtrial
record15489NNrecord
,15490,,
Dr15491NPDr
.15492SENT.
Abowd15493NNSAbowd
testified15494VVDtestify
how15495WRBhow
it15496PPit
would15497MDwould
not15498RBnot
be15499VBbe
a15500DTa
problem15501NNproblem
.15502SENT.
Second15503RBsecond
,15504,,
I15505PPI
'd15506MDwould
like15507VVlike
to15508TOto
point15509VVpoint
Your15510PP$your
Honors15511NNShonors
to15512TOto
the15513DTthe
key15514JJkey
differences15515NNSdifference
memo15516NNmemo
at15517INat
page15518NNpage
14815519CD@card@
of15520INof
the15521DTthe
Joint15522NPJoint
Appendix15523NPAppendix
,15524,,
the15525DTthe
very15526RBvery
...15527:...
the15528DTthe
one15529CDone
full15530JJfull
paragraph15531NNparagraph
,15532,,
the15533DTthe
first15534JJfirst
sentence15535NNsentence
says15536VVZsay
,15537,,
"15538``"
The15539DTthe
relative15540JJrelative
quality15541NNquality
of15542INof
Alternative15543NPAlternative
C15544NPC
versus15545CCversus
Alternative15546NPAlternative
D15547NPD
will15548MDwill
depend15549VVdepend
on15550INon
the15551DTthe
relative15552JJrelative
importance15553NNimportance
of15554INof
the15555DTthe
errors15556NNSerror
in15557INin
the15558DTthe
administrative15559JJadministrative
data15560NNSdatum
,15561,,
response15562NNresponse
data15563NNSdatum
,15564,,
and15565CCand
imputations15566NNSimputation
.15567SENT.
"15568``"
It15569PPit
then15570RBthen
goes15571VVZgo
through15572INthrough
and15573CCand
discusses15574VVZdiscuss
the15575DTthe
various15576JJvarious
types15577NNStype
of15578INof
errors15579NNSerror
.15580SENT.
And15581CCand
its15582PP$its
final15583JJfinal
conclusion15584NNconclusion
is15585VBZbe
,15586,,
"15587''"
Unfortunately15588RBunfortunately
,15589,,
the15590DTthe
Census15591NPCensus
Bureau15592NPBureau
cannot15593MDcan
quantify15594VVquantify
the15595DTthe
relative15596JJrelative
magnitude15597NNmagnitude
of15598INof
the15599DTthe
errors15600NNSerror
across15601INacross
the15602DTthe
alternatives15603NNSalternative
.15604SENT.
"15605``"
Third15606JJthird
,15607,,
in15608INin
terms15609NNSterm
of15610INof
response15611NNresponse
rates15612NNSrate
,15613,,
the15614DTthe
administrative15615JJadministrative
record15616NNrecord
shows15617VVZshow
that15618IN/thatthat
the15619DTthe
Census15620NPCensus
Bureau15621NPBureau
staff15622NNstaff
believed15623VVDbelieve
that15624IN/thatthat
there15625EXthere
would15626MDwould
be15627VBbe
a15628DTa
515629CD5
.15630SENT.
115631CD1
percent15632NNpercent
decrease15633NNdecrease
in15634INin
the15635DTthe
initial15636JJinitial
response15637NNresponse
rates15638NNSrate
from15639INfrom
adding15640VVGadd
the15641DTthe
citizenship15642NNcitizenship
question15643NNquestion
.15644SENT.
But15645CCbut
,15646,,
as15647INas
Secretary15648NPSecretary
Ross15649NPRoss
points15650VVZpoint
out15651RPout
in15652INin
his15653PP$his
memorandum15654NNmemorandum
,15655,,
that15656WDTthat
does15657VVZdo
n't15658RBn't
take15659VVtake
into15660INinto
account15661NNaccount
follow-up15662NNfollow-up
operations15663NNSoperation
.15664SENT.
That15665DTthat
's15666VBZbe
the15667DTthe
response15668NNresponse
rate15669NNrate
drop15670NNdrop
before15671INbefore
follow-up15672NNfollow-up
operations15673NNSoperation
.15674SENT.
And15675CCand
it15676PPit
does15677VVZdo
n't15678RBn't
disaggregate15679JJdisaggregate
between15680INbetween
those15681DTthose
who15682WPwho
are15683VBPbe
going15684VVGgo
to15685TOto
be15686VBbe
put15687VVNput
off15688RPoff
by15689INby
the15690DTthe
citizenship15691NNcitizenship
question15692NNquestion
itself15693PPitself
,15694,,
as15695RBas
opposed15696VVNoppose
to15697TOto
those15698DTthose
who15699WPwho
are15700VBPbe
put15701VVNput
off15702RPoff
by15703INby
the15704DTthe
larger15705JJRlarge
macro15706NNmacro
environment15707NNenvironment
because15708INbecause
they15709PPthey
do15710VVPdo
n't15711RBn't
trust15712VVtrust
the15713DTthe
government15714NNgovernment
or15715CCor
do15716VVPdo
n't15717RBn't
like15718VVlike
this15719DTthis
particular15720JJparticular
administration15721NNadministration
.15722SENT.
And15723CCand
that15724WDTthat
,15725,,
I15726PPI
think15727VVPthink
,15728,,
is15729VBZbe
one15730CDone
of15731INof
the15732DTthe
reasons15733NNSreason
why15734WRBwhy
Dr15735NNDr
.15736SENT.
Abowd15737NNSAbowd
concluded15738VVDconclude
in15739INin
the15740DTthe
testimony15741NNtestimony
that15742IN/thatthat
Justice15743NPJustice
Breyer15744NPBreyer
cited15745VVDcite
that15746IN/thatthat
"15747``"
there15748EXthere
's15749VBZbe
no15750DTno
credible15751JJcredible
quantitative15752JJquantitative
evidence15753NNevidence
that15754IN/thatthat
the15755DTthe
addition15756NNaddition
of15757INof
a15758DTa
citizenship15759NNcitizenship
question15760NNquestion
"15761''"
...15762:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15763LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I15764PPI
...15765:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]15766LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...15767:...
"15768``"
will15769MDwill
affect15770VVaffect
the15771DTthe
accuracy15772NNaccuracy
of15773INof
the15774DTthe
count15775NNcount
.15776SENT.
"15777''"
And15778CCand
...15779:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15780LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...15781:...
I15782PPI
thought15783VVDthink
that15784DTthat
Dr15785NNDr
.15786SENT.
Abowd15787NNSAbowd
stated15788VVDstate
and15789CCand
the15790DTthe
district15791NNdistrict
court15792NNcourt
found15793VVDfind
that15794IN/thatthat
the15795DTthe
follow-up15796NNfollow-up
process15797NNprocess
was15798VBDbe
,15799,,
at15800INat
best15801JJSgood
,15802,,
riddled15803VVNriddle
with15804INwith
a15805DTa
number15806NNnumber
of15807INof
...15808:...
of15809INof
...15810:...
of15811INof
inadequacies15812NNSinadequacy
and15813CCand
that15814IN/thatthat
it15815PPit
would15816MDwould
n't15817RBn't
be15818VBbe
adequate15819JJadequate
enough15820RBenough
to15821TOto
take15822VVtake
care15823NNcare
of15824INof
the15825DTthe
shortfall15826NNshortfall
.15827SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]15828LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Well15829UHwell
,15830,,
we15831PPwe
can15832MDcan
debate15833VVdebate
about15834RBabout
whether15835INwhether
it15836PPit
would15837MDwould
be15838VBbe
adequate15839JJadequate
enough15840RBenough
,15841,,
but15842CCbut
in15843INin
order15844NNorder
to15845TOto
say15846VVsay
that15847IN/thatthat
the15848DTthe
final15849JJfinal
self-response15850NNself-response
rate15851NNrate
would15852MDwould
drop15853VVdrop
by15854INby
515855CD5
.15856SENT.
115857CD1
percent15858NNpercent
,15859,,
you15860PPyou
have15861VHPhave
to15862TOto
conclude15863VVconclude
that15864IN/thatthat
it15865PPit
's15866VBZbe
zero15867CDzero
percent15868NNpercent
accurate15869JJaccurate
.15870SENT.
And15871CCand
I15872PPI
do15873VVPdo
n't15874RBn't
think15875VVthink
that15876IN/thatthat
there15877EXthere
's15878VBZbe
any15879DTany
basis15880NNbasis
in15881INin
the15882DTthe
record15883NNrecord
to15884TOto
conclude15885VVconclude
that15886IN/thatthat
it15887PPit
's15888VBZbe
...15889:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15890LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So15891RBso
how15892WRBhow
much15893JJmuch
accuracy15894NNaccuracy
...15895:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]15896LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...15897:...
zero15898CDzero
percent15899NNpercent
accurate15900JJaccurate
.15901SENT.
So15902RBso
...15903:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15904LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...15905:...
would15906MDwould
be15907VBbe
...15908:...
let15909VVlet
's15910VBZbe
assume15911VVassume
it15912PPit
were15913VBDbe
515914CD5
.15915SENT.
815916CD8
or15917CCor
something15918NNsomething
close15919NNclose
to15920TOto
it15921PPit
.15922SENT.
Is15923VBZbe
that15924IN/thatthat
de15925NPde
minimis15926NPminimis
to15927TOto
you15928PPyou
?15929SENT?
Is15930VBZbe
that15931DTthat
...15932:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]15933LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Your15934PP$your
Honor15935NPHonor
,15936,,
I15937PPI
think15938VVPthink
...15939:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]15940LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...15941:...
inconsequential15942JJinconsequential
?15943SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]15944LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...15945:...
I15946PPI
think15947VVPthink
that15948IN/thatthat
that15949DTthat
is15950VBZbe
largely15951RBlargely
an15952DTan
impossible15953JJimpossible
question15954NNquestion
to15955TOto
answer15956VVanswer
.15957SENT.
That15958DTthat
is15959VBZbe
not15960RBnot
built15961VVNbuild
into15962INinto
the15963DTthe
Constitution15964NPConstitution
itself15965PPitself
.15966SENT.
There15967EXthere
's15968VBZbe
always15969RBalways
going15970VVGgo
to15971TOto
be15972VBbe
a15973DTa
tradeoff15974NNtradeoff
.15975SENT.
The15976DTthe
long-form15977NNlong-form
census15978NNcensus
,15979,,
for15980INfor
example15981NNexample
,15982,,
caused15983VVDcause
a15984DTa
drop15985NNdrop
in15986INin
self-response15987JJself-response
rates15988NNSrate
relative15989JJrelative
to15990TOto
...15991:...
to15992TOto
the15993DTthe
short15994JJshort
form15995NNform
by15996INby
,15997,,
I15998PPI
believe15999VVPbelieve
,16000,,
around16001INaround
percent16002NNpercent
.16003SENT.
But16004CCbut
my16005PP$my
final16006JJfinal
point16007NNpoint
is16008VBZbe
one16009CDone
that16010IN/thatthat
Mr16011NPMr
.16012SENT.
Letter16013NNletter
alluded16014VVNallude
to16015TOto
,16016,,
and16017CCand
that16018DTthat
is16019VBZbe
under16020INunder
...16021:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16022LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That16023DTthat
's16024VBZbe
why16025WRBwhy
you16026PPyou
keep16027VVPkeep
...16028:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16029LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...16030:...
my16031PP$my
friend's16032NNSfriend's
...16033:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16034LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...16035:...
the16036DTthe
short16037JJshort
form16038NNform
.16039SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16040LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Right16041NPRight
,16042,,
Your16043PP$your
Honor16044NPHonor
.16045SENT.
And16046CCand
under16047INunder
my16048PP$my
friend16049NNfriend
's16050VBZbe
on16051INon
the16052DTthe
other16053JJother
side16054NNside
's16055POS's
position16056NNposition
,16057,,
you16058PPyou
are16059VBPbe
effectively16060RBeffectively
empowering16061VVGempower
any16062DTany
group16063NNgroup
in16064INin
the16065DTthe
country16066NNcountry
to16067TOto
knock16068VVknock
off16069RPoff
any16070DTany
question16071NNquestion
on16072INon
the16073DTthe
census16074NNcensus
if16075INif
they16076PPthey
simply16077RBsimply
get16078VVPget
together16079RBtogether
and16080CCand
boycott16081VVboycott
it16082PPit
.16083SENT.
There16084EXthere
are16085VBPbe
many16086JJmany
people16087NNSpeople
in16088INin
this16089DTthis
country16090NNcountry
who16091WPwho
might16092MDmight
find16093VVfind
the16094DTthe
sex16095NNsex
question16096NNquestion
objectionable16097JJobjectionable
because16098INbecause
it16099PPit
limits16100VVZlimit
individuals16101NNSindividual
to16102TOto
a16103DTa
binary16104JJbinary
choice16105NNchoice
.16106SENT.
If16107INif
a16108DTa
large16109JJlarge
number16110NNnumber
of16111INof
people16112NNSpeople
got16113VVDget
together16114RBtogether
in16115INin
one16116CDone
state16117NNstate
and16118CCand
said16119VVDsay
we16120PPwe
're16121VBPbe
going16122VVGgo
to16123TOto
boycott16124VVboycott
the16125DTthe
census16126NNcensus
...16127:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16128LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
General16129NPGeneral
...16130:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16131LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...16132:...
as16133RBas
long16134RBlong
as16135INas
you16136PPyou
include16137VVPinclude
...16138:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16139LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
General16140NPGeneral
...16141:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16142LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...16143:...
that16144DTthat
sex16145NNsex
question16146NNquestion
,16147,,
you16148PPyou
're16149VBPbe
effectively16150RBeffectively
empowering16151VVGempower
...16152:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16153LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
General16154NPGeneral
,16155,,
are16156VBPbe
you16157PPyou
...16158:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16159LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...16160:...
them16161PPthem
to16162TOto
knock16163VVknock
that16164IN/thatthat
off16165RBoff
...16166:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16167LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...16168:...
suggesting16169VVGsuggest
...16170:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16171LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Justice16172NPJustice
Sotomayor16173NPSotomayor
.16174SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16175LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Are16176VBPbe
you16177PPyou
suggesting16178VVGsuggest
...16179:...
are16180VBPbe
you16181PPyou
suggesting16182VVGsuggest
that16183IN/thatthat
Hispanics16184NNSHispanic
are16185VBPbe
boycotting16186VVGboycott
the16187DTthe
census16188NNcensus
,16189,,
that16190WDTthat
they16191PPthey
...16192:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16193LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Not16194RBnot
...16195:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16196LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Are16197VBPbe
you16198PPyou
suggesting16199VVGsuggest
they16200PPthey
do16201VVPdo
n't16202RBn't
have16203VHhave
,16204,,
whether16205INwhether
it16206PPit
's16207VBZbe
rational16208JJrational
or16209CCor
not16210RBnot
,16211,,
that16212IN/thatthat
they16213PPthey
do16214VVPdo
n't16215RBn't
have16216VHhave
a16217DTa
legitimate16218JJlegitimate
fear16219NNfear
?16220SENT?
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16221LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Not16222RBnot
in16223INin
the16224DTthe
slightest16225JJSslight
,16226,,
Your16227PP$your
Honor16228NPHonor
.16229SENT.
I16230PPI
am16231VBPbe
suggesting16232VVGsuggest
that16233IN/thatthat
the16234DTthe
risk16235NNrisk
...16236:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]16237LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So16238RBso
...16239:...
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16240LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
...16241:...
of16242INof
my16243PP$my
friend16244NNfriend
's16245POS's
theory16246NNtheory
on16247INon
the16248DTthe
other16249JJother
side16250NNside
is16251VBZbe
that16252IN/thatthat
it16253PPit
countenances16254VVZcountenance
precisely16255RBprecisely
that16256DTthat
type16257NNtype
of16258INof
coordinated16259VVNcoordinate
behavior16260NNbehavior
that16261WDTthat
would16262MDwould
empower16263VVempower
groups16264NNSgroup
to16265TOto
knock16266VVknock
off16267RPoff
any16268DTany
question16269NNquestion
of16270INof
the16271DTthe
census16272NNcensus
that16273IN/thatthat
they16274PPthey
found16275VVDfind
to16276TOto
be16277VBbe
particularly16278RBparticularly
objectionable16279JJobjectionable
.16280SENT.
Mr16281NPMr
.16282SENT.
Chief16283NPChief
Justice16284NPJustice
,16285,,
unless16286INunless
the16287DTthe
Court16288NPCourt
has16289VHZhave
further16290JJRfurther
questions16291NNSquestion
?16292SENT?
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16293LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We16294PPwe
're16295VBPbe
all16296RBall
done16297VVNdo
.16298SENT.
[GENERAL FRANCISCO]16299LOC[GENERAL FRANCISCO]
Thank16300VVthank
you16301PPyou
,16302,,
Your16303PP$your
Honor16304NPHonor
.16305SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16306LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank16307VVthank
you16308PPyou
,16309,,
General16310NPGeneral
.16311SENT.
The16312DTthe
case16313NNcase
is16314VBZbe
submitted16315VVNsubmit
.16316SENT.