[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We2PPwe
'll3MDwill
hear4VVhear
argument5NNargument
this6DTthis
morning7NNmorning
in8INin
Case9NPCase
18-119510CD@card@
,11,,
Espinoza12NPEspinoza
versus13CCversus
the14DTthe
Montana15NPMontana
Department16NPDepartment
of17INof
Revenue18NPRevenue
.19SENT.
Mr20NPMr
.21SENT.
Komer22NPKomer
.23SENT.
[MR. KOMER]24LOC[MR. KOMER]
Mr25NPMr
.26SENT.
Chief27NPChief
Justice28NPJustice
,29,,
and30CCand
may31MDmay
it32PPit
please33VVplease
the34DTthe
Court35NPCourt
:36::
This37DTthis
case38NNcase
asks39VVZask
whether40INwhether
the41DTthe
Federal42NPFederal
Constitution43NPConstitution
allows44VVZallow
the45DTthe
wholesale46JJwholesale
exclusion47NNexclusion
of48INof
religious49JJreligious
schools50NNSschool
from51INfrom
scholarship52NNscholarship
programs53NNSprogram
.54SENT.
It55PPit
does56VVZdo
not57RBnot
.58SENT.
Yet59RByet
,60,,
Montana61NPMontana
's62POS's
Blaine63NPBlaine
Amendment64NPAmendment
requires65VVZrequire
that66DTthat
exclusion67NNexclusion
.68SENT.
As69INas
a70DTa
result71NNresult
,72,,
the73DTthe
Blaine74NPBlaine
Amendment75NPAmendment
discriminates76VVZdiscriminate
against77INagainst
religious78JJreligious
conduct79NNconduct
,80,,
beliefs81NNSbelief
,82,,
and83CCand
status84NNstatus
in85INin
violation86NNviolation
of87INof
the88DTthe
free-exercise89NNfree-exercise
clause90NNclause
under91INunder
Trinity92NPTrinity
Lutheran93NPLutheran
.94SENT.
The95DTthe
Montana96NPMontana
Supreme97NPSupreme
Court98NPCourt
disagreed99VVDdisagree
.100SENT.
That101DTthat
court102NNcourt
held103VVDhold
that104IN/thatthat
barring105VVGbar
religious106JJreligious
schools107NNSschool
from108INfrom
the109DTthe
program110NNprogram
did111VVDdo
not112RBnot
violate113VVviolate
the114DTthe
Federal115NPFederal
Constitution116NPConstitution
.117SENT.
This118DTthis
Court119NPCourt
should120MDshould
reverse121VVreverse
that122DTthat
judgment123NNjudgment
.124SENT.
Even125RBeven
Respondents126NNSrespondent
now127RBnow
concede128VVPconcede
that129IN/thatthat
excluding130VVGexclude
religious131JJreligious
schools132NNSschool
from133INfrom
the134DTthe
program135NNprogram
is136VBZbe
unconstitutional137JJunconstitutional
,138,,
but139CCbut
they140PPthey
argue141VVPargue
that142IN/thatthat
the143DTthe
court144NNcourt
avoided145VVDavoid
this146DTthis
discrimination147NNdiscrimination
by148INby
invalidating149VVGinvalidate
the150DTthe
entire151JJentire
program152NNprogram
.153SENT.
This154DTthis
is155VBZbe
wrong156JJwrong
.157SENT.
The158DTthe
only159JJonly
reason160NNreason
the161DTthe
court162NNcourt
invalidated163VVDinvalidate
the164DTthe
program165NNprogram
was166VBDbe
because167INbecause
it168PPit
included169VVDinclude
religious170JJreligious
schools171NNSschool
.172SENT.
And173CCand
the174DTthe
court175NNcourt
's176POS's
remedy177NNremedy
did178VVDdo
not179RBnot
cure180VVcure
its181PP$its
discriminatory182JJdiscriminatory
judgment183NNjudgment
,184,,
nor185CCnor
should186MDshould
the187DTthe
remedy188NNremedy
shield189VVshield
the190DTthe
judgment191NNjudgment
from192INfrom
review193NNreview
.194SENT.
Petitioners195NNSpetitioner
brought196VVDbring
this197DTthis
lawsuit198NNlawsuit
because199INbecause
they200PPthey
were201VBDbe
denied202VVNdeny
scholarships203NNSscholarship
based204VVNbase
on205INon
religion206NNreligion
,207,,
and208CCand
they209PPthey
are210VBPbe
still211RBstill
being212VBGbe
denied213VVNdeny
scholarships214NNSscholarship
based215VVNbase
on216INon
religion217NNreligion
.218SENT.
If219INif
the220DTthe
court221NNcourt
had222VHDhave
shut223VVNshut
down224RPdown
the225DTthe
program226NNprogram
because227INbecause
it228PPit
included229VVDinclude
Muslim230JJMuslim
schools231NNSschool
or232CCor
African-American233NPAfrican-American
schools234NNSschool
,235,,
there236EXthere
's237VBZbe
no238DTno
question239NNquestion
that240WDTthat
would241MDwould
be242VBbe
unconstitutional243JJunconstitutional
.244SENT.
We245PPwe
ask246VVPask
you247PPyou
to248TOto
reverse249VVreverse
.250SENT.
Respondents251NNSrespondent
argue252VVPargue
in253INin
the254DTthe
alternative255NNalternative
that256IN/thatthat
Locke257NPLocke
allows258VVZallow
them259PPthem
to260TOto
exclude261VVexclude
the262DTthe
religious263JJreligious
schools264NNSschool
and265CCand
that266IN/thatthat
this267DTthis
case268NNcase
falls269VVZfall
within270INwithin
the271DTthe
play272NNplay
in273INin
the274DTthe
joints275NNSjoint
.276SENT.
But277CCbut
that278WDTthat
would279MDwould
allow280VVallow
the281DTthe
exception282NNexception
to283TOto
swallow284VVswallow
the285DTthe
rule286NNrule
.287SENT.
As288INas
Trinity289NPTrinity
Lutheran290NPLutheran
made291VVDmake
clear292JJclear
,293,,
the294DTthe
rule295NNrule
is296VBZbe
religious297JJreligious
neutrality298NNneutrality
and299CCand
Locke300NPLocke
only301RBonly
a302DTa
narrow303JJnarrow
exception304NNexception
.305SENT.
We306PPwe
argue307VVPargue
that308IN/thatthat
Locke309NPLocke
is310VBZbe
the311DTthe
exception312NNexception
that313WDTthat
proves314VVZprove
the315DTthe
rule316NNrule
.317SENT.
2318CD2
In319INin
Trinity320NPTrinity
Lutheran321NPLutheran
...322:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]323LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
May324NPmay
...325:...
may326MDmay
I327PPI
ask328VVask
you329PPyou
some330DTsome
threshold331NNthreshold
questions332NNSquestion
about333INabout
Article334NPArticle
III335NPIII
standing336NNstanding
?337SENT?
Under338INunder
the339DTthe
Montana340NPMontana
judgment341NNjudgment
,342,,
these343DTthese
parents344NNSparent
are345VBPbe
treated346VVNtreat
no347RBno
differently348RBdifferently
than349INthan
parents350NNSparent
of351INof
children352NNSchild
who353WPwho
are354VBPbe
going355VVGgo
to356TOto
secular357JJsecular
private358JJprivate
schools359NNSschool
,360,,
so361RBso
where362WRBwhere
is363VBZbe
the364DTthe
harm365NNharm
?366SENT?
When367WRBwhen
a368DTa
differential369NNdifferential
is370VBZbe
challenged371VVNchallenge
,372,,
the373DTthe
court374NNcourt
inspecting375VVGinspect
the376DTthe
state377NNstate
law378NNlaw
can379MDcan
level380VVlevel
up381RPup
or382CCor
level383VVlevel
down384RPdown
.385SENT.
And386CCand
here387RBhere
it388PPit
leveled389VVDlevel
down390RPdown
.391SENT.
So392RBso
these393DTthese
would394MDwould
be395VBbe
parents396NNSparent
of397INof
children398NNSchild
going399VVGgo
to400TOto
secular401JJsecular
private402JJprivate
schools403NNSschool
.404SENT.
How405WRBHow
are406VBPbe
you407PPyou
harmed408VVNharm
?409SENT?
[MR. KOMER]410LOC[MR. KOMER]
Your411PP$your
Honor412NPHonor
,413,,
the414DTthe
Montana415NPMontana
Supreme416NPSupreme
Court417NPCourt
lacked418VVDlack
the419DTthe
necessary420JJnecessary
predicate421NNpredicate
for422INfor
leveling423VVGlevel
up424RPup
or425CCor
for426INfor
leveling427VVGlevel
down428RPdown
because429INbecause
they430PPthey
got431VVDget
the432DTthe
federal433JJfederal
Supreme434NPSupreme
Court435NPCourt
question436NNquestion
wrong437JJwrong
.438SENT.
But439CCbut
for440INfor
getting441VVGget
that442DTthat
question443NNquestion
wrong444JJwrong
,445,,
we446PPwe
would447MDwould
never448RBnever
have449VHhave
moved450VVNmove
on451RPon
to452TOto
the453DTthe
issue454NNissue
of455INof
remedying456VVGremedy
that457DTthat
problem458NNproblem
because459INbecause
it460PPit
is461VBZbe
n't462RBn't
a463DTa
constitutional464JJconstitutional
problem465NNproblem
.466SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]467LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But468CCbut
there469EXthere
's470VBZbe
another471DTanother
serious472JJserious
problem473NNproblem
,474,,
and475CCand
that476DTthat
's477VBZbe
the478DTthe
parents479NNSparent
are480VBPbe
not481RBnot
taxpayers482NNStaxpayer
.483SENT.
Taxpayers484NNStaxpayer
are485VBPbe
the486DTthe
people487NNSpeople
who488WPwho
contribute489VVPcontribute
to490TOto
these491DTthese
student492NNstudent
scholarship493NNscholarship
organizations494NNSorganization
.495SENT.
And496CCand
this497DTthis
Court498NPCourt
has499VHZhave
held500VVNhold
that501IN/thatthat
there502EXthere
is503VBZbe
no504DTno
standing505NNstanding
to506TOto
challenge507VVchallenge
somebody508NNsomebody
else509RBelse
's510POS's
tax511NNtax
status512NNstatus
.513SENT.
It514PPit
seems515VVZseem
to516TOto
me517PPme
that518IN/thatthat
the519DTthe
Court520NPCourt
's521POS's
decision522NNdecision
in523INin
Eastern524NPEastern
Kentucky525NPKentucky
is526VBZbe
very527RBvery
close528JJclose
to529TOto
this530DTthis
one531CDone
,532,,
and533CCand
the534DTthe
Court535NPCourt
said536VVDsay
you537PPyou
say538VVPsay
you539PPyou
're540VBPbe
injured541VVNinjure
because542INbecause
these543DTthese
hospitals544NNShospital
are545VBPbe
not546RBnot
providing547VVGprovide
...548:...
providing549VVGprovide
services550NNSservice
to551TOto
you552PPyou
,553,,
but554CCbut
you555PPyou
are556VBPbe
not557RBnot
the558DTthe
taxpayer559NNtaxpayer
and560CCand
you561PPyou
can562MDcan
't563RB't
complain564VVPcomplain
about565INabout
the566DTthe
tax567NNtax
treatment568NNtreatment
of569INof
someone570NNsomeone
else571RBelse
.572SENT.
So573RBso
how574WRBhow
do575VVPdo
you576PPyou
distinguish577VVdistinguish
Eastern578NPEastern
Kentucky579NPKentucky
?580SENT?
[MR. KOMER]581LOC[MR. KOMER]
Well582UHWell
,583,,
Your584PP$your
Honor585NPHonor
,586,,
here587RBhere
what588WPwhat
's589VBZbe
involved590VVNinvolve
is591VBZbe
a592DTa
scholarship593NNscholarship
program594NNprogram
,595,,
and596CCand
the597DTthe
scholarship598NNscholarship
program599NNprogram
's600POS's
intended601JJintended
beneficiaries602NNSbeneficiary
are603VBPbe
the604DTthe
parents605NNSparent
,606,,
like607INlike
our608PP$our
clients609NNSclient
,610,,
who611WPwho
are612VBPbe
enabled613VVNenable
to614TOto
exercise615VVexercise
their616PP$their
constitutional617JJconstitutional
right618NNright
to619TOto
choose620VVchoose
...621:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]622LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
They623PPthey
're624VBPbe
challenging625VVGchallenge
the626DTthe
tax627NNtax
status628NNstatus
of629INof
someone630NNsomeone
else631RBelse
,632,,
not633RBnot
themselves634PPthemselves
.635SENT.
[MR. KOMER]636LOC[MR. KOMER]
No637NPNo
...638:...
no639UHno
,640,,
Your641PP$your
Honor642NPHonor
,643,,
it644PPit
's645VBZbe
because646INbecause
the647DTthe
Montana648NPMontana
Supreme649NPSupreme
Court650NPCourt
has651VHZhave
extended652VVNextend
their653PP$their
Blaine654NPBlaine
Amendment655NPAmendment
to656TOto
include657VVinclude
scholarships658NNSscholarship
that659WDTthat
are660VBPbe
generated661VVNgenerate
by662INby
the663DTthe
giving664NNgiving
of665INof
tax666NNtax
credits667NNScredit
...668:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]669LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I670PPI
'm671VBPbe
sorry672JJsorry
.673SENT.
Is674VBZbe
there675RBthere
any676DTany
case677NNcase
we678PPwe
've679VHPhave
ever680RBever
had681VHNhave
where682WRBwhere
we683PPwe
've684VHPhave
recognized685VVNrecognize
a686DTa
tax687NNtax
...688:...
a689DTa
...690:...
a691DTa
party692NNparty
who693WPwho
was694VBDbe
n't695RBn't
either696RBeither
the697DTthe
taxpayer698NNtaxpayer
or699CCor
the700DTthe
direct701JJdirect
recipient702NNrecipient
of703INof
the704DTthe
taxes705NNStaxis
,706,,
benefits707NNSbenefit
of708INof
the709DTthe
taxes710NNStaxis
?711SENT?
So712RBso
here713RBhere
the714DTthe
parents715NNSparent
not716RBnot
just717RBjust
are718VBPbe
n't719RBn't
the720DTthe
taxpayer721NNtaxpayer
;722:;
they723PPthey
're724VBPbe
not725RBnot
the726DTthe
schools727NNSschool
that728WDTthat
receive729VVPreceive
the730DTthe
money731NNmoney
.732SENT.
Neither733CCneither
are734VBPbe
they735PPthey
guaranteed736VVNguarantee
receipt737NNreceipt
of738INof
the739DTthe
money740NNmoney
.741SENT.
We742PPwe
're743VBPbe
told744VVNtell
that745IN/thatthat
there746EXthere
's747VBZbe
less748JJRless
money749NNmoney
than750INthan
applicants751NNSapplicant
.752SENT.
So753RBso
they754PPthey
're755VBPbe
like756INlike
three757CDthree
levels758NNSlevel
removed759VVNremove
.760SENT.
In761INin
what762WPwhat
other763JJother
case764NNcase
can765MDcan
you766PPyou
cite767VVcite
for768INfor
me769PPme
have770VHPhave
we771PPwe
permitted772VVDpermit
such773PDTsuch
a774DTa
removed775VVNremove
party776NNparty
to777TOto
have778VHhave
standing779NNstanding
?780SENT?
[MR. KOMER]781LOC[MR. KOMER]
I782PPI
...783:...
Your784PP$your
Honor785NPHonor
,786,,
I787PPI
do788VVPdo
n't789RBn't
think790VVthink
that791IN/thatthat
we792PPwe
've793VHPhave
had794VHDhave
a795DTa
state796NNstate
constitutional797JJconstitutional
provision798NNprovision
ever799RBever
be800VBbe
applied801VVNapply
in802INin
such803PDTsuch
a804DTa
...805:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]806LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
It807PPit
does808VVZdo
n't809RBn't
matter810VVmatter
that811DTthat
...812:...
[MR. KOMER]813LOC[MR. KOMER]
...814:...
extended815JJextended
fashion816NNfashion
.817SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]818LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...819:...
we820PPwe
've821VHPhave
had822VHDhave
...823:...
we824PPwe
've825VHPhave
had826VHDhave
a827DTa
case828NNcase
involving829VVGinvolve
schools830NNSschool
that831WDTthat
discriminate832VVPdiscriminate
,833,,
and834CCand
we835PPwe
've836VHPhave
said837VVNsay
that838IN/thatthat
those839DTthose
schools840NNSschool
...841:...
that842DTthat
taxpayers843NNStaxpayer
...844:...
not845RBnot
taxpayers846NNStaxpayer
...847:...
that848IN/thatthat
individuals849NNSindividual
who850WPwho
feel851VVPfeel
affected852VVNaffect
by853INby
that854DTthat
discrimination855NNdiscrimination
do856VVPdo
n't857RBn't
have858VHhave
standing859NNstanding
because860INbecause
they861PPthey
're862VBPbe
not863RBnot
the864DTthe
people865NNSpeople
...866:...
they867PPthey
're868VBPbe
not869RBnot
the870DTthe
taxpayer871NNtaxpayer
and872CCand
they873PPthey
're874VBPbe
not875RBnot
the876DTthe
recipient877NNrecipient
of878INof
the879DTthe
discrimination880NNdiscrimination
directly881RBdirectly
,882,,
so883RBso
...884:...
and885CCand
I'm886NPI'm
...887:...
I888PPI
'm889VBPbe
having890VHGhave
a891DTa
problem892NNproblem
understanding893NNunderstanding
how894WRBhow
you895PPyou
have896VHPhave
standing897NNstanding
either898CCeither
for899INfor
the900DTthe
taxpayer901NNtaxpayer
or902CCor
for903INfor
the904DTthe
school905NNschool
who906WPwho
receives907VVZreceive
the908DTthe
money909NNmoney
.910SENT.
[MR. KOMER]911LOC[MR. KOMER]
Well912UHWell
...913:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]914LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
And915CCand
why916NNwhy
...917:...
you918PPyou
have919VHPhave
a920DTa
lot921NNlot
of922INof
contingencies923NNScontingency
.924SENT.
Other925JJother
...926:...
that927IN/thatthat
taxpayers928NNStaxpayer
won929MDwill
't930RB't
give931VVgive
the932DTthe
$933$$
150934CD@card@
without935INwithout
the936DTthe
tax937NNtax
credit938NNcredit
,939,,
that940IN/thatthat
the941DTthe
school942NNschool
will943MDwill
actually944RBactually
pick945VVpick
them946PPthem
,947,,
and948CCand
that949IN/thatthat
even950RBeven
if951INif
picked952VVNpick
in953INin
the954DTthe
past955NNpast
,956,,
that957WDTthat
they958PPthey
'll959MDwill
be960VBbe
picked961VVNpick
in962INin
the963DTthe
future964NNfuture
.965SENT.
It966PPit
seems967VVZseem
a968DTa
high969JJhigh
level970NNlevel
of971INof
contingencies972NNScontingency
.973SENT.
So974RBso
mention975VVmention
one976CDone
case977NNcase
that978WDTthat
comes979VVZcome
close980NNclose
to981TOto
that982DTthat
.983SENT.
[MR. KOMER]984LOC[MR. KOMER]
Any985DTany
case986NNcase
that987WDTthat
involves988VVZinvolve
Article989NPArticle
III990NPIII
standing991NNstanding
where992WRBwhere
the993DTthe
intended994VVNintend
beneficiaries995NNSbeneficiary
of996INof
the997DTthe
program998NNprogram
are999VBPbe
...1000:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1001LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
The1002DTthe
school1003NNschool
's1004VBZbe
the1005DTthe
intended1006JJintended
beneficiary1007NNbeneficiary
.1008SENT.
[MR. KOMER]1009LOC[MR. KOMER]
I1010PPI
...1011:...
I1012PPI
...1013:...
respectfully1014RBrespectfully
,1015,,
Your1016PP$your
Honor1017NPHonor
,1018,,
I1019PPI
disagree1020VVPdisagree
.1021SENT.
The1022DTthe
financial1023JJfinancial
benefit1024NNbenefit
from1025INfrom
a1026DTa
scholarship1027NNscholarship
program1028NNprogram
is1029VBZbe
to1030TOto
the1031DTthe
families1032NNSfamily
.1033SENT.
The1034DTthe
families1035NNSfamily
receive1036VVPreceive
the1037DTthe
benefit1038NNbenefit
of1039INof
the1040DTthe
scholarship1041NNscholarship
.1042SENT.
The1043DTthe
scholarship1044NNscholarship
is1045VBZbe
used1046VVNuse
by1047INby
the1048DTthe
families1049NNSfamily
to1050TOto
buy1051VVbuy
the1052DTthe
education1053NNeducation
...1054:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1055LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Counsel1056NPCounsel
...1057:...
[MR. KOMER]1058LOC[MR. KOMER]
...1059:...
at1060INat
the1061DTthe
school1062NNschool
.1063SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1064LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...1065:...
the1066DTthe
financial1067JJfinancial
benefit1068NNbenefit
is1069VBZbe
to1070TOto
the1071DTthe
taxpayer1072NNtaxpayer
who1073WPwho
gets1074VVZget
a1075DTa
tax1076NNtax
credit1077NNcredit
.1078SENT.
[MR. KOMER]1079LOC[MR. KOMER]
Actually1080RBactually
...1081:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1082LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That1083DTthat
's1084VBZbe
the1085DTthe
intent1086NNintent
.1087SENT.
It1088PPit
's1089VBZbe
an1090DTan
incentive1091NNincentive
for1092INfor
the1093DTthe
taxpayer1094NNtaxpayer
to1095TOto
give1096VVgive
money1097NNmoney
,1098,,
but1099CCbut
there1100EXthere
are1101VBPbe
many1102JJmany
incentives1103NNSincentive
that1104WDTthat
incentivize1105VVPincentivize
people1106NNSpeople
to1107TOto
give1108VVgive
money1109NNmoney
.1110SENT.
[MR. KOMER]1111LOC[MR. KOMER]
Yes1112NPYes
,1113,,
Your1114PP$your
Honor1115NPHonor
,1116,,
it1117PPit
does1118VVZdo
incentivize1119VVincentivize
donations1120NNSdonation
.1121SENT.
That1122DTthat
's1123VBZbe
its1124PP$its
purpose1125NNpurpose
.1126SENT.
And1127CCand
it1128PPit
actually1129RBactually
succeeded1130VVDsucceed
,1131,,
while1132INwhile
the1133DTthe
program1134NNprogram
was1135VBDbe
going1136VVGgo
,1137,,
in1138INin
awarding1139VVGaward
scholarships1140NNSscholarship
to1141TOto
two1142CDtwo
of1143INof
our1144PP$our
three1145CDthree
client1146NNclient
families1147NNSfamily
.1148SENT.
And1149CCand
...1150:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]1151LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
How1152WRBHow
do1153VVPdo
you1154PPyou
know1155VVPknow
that1156IN/thatthat
they1157PPthey
would1158MDwould
n't1159RBn't
have1160VHhave
been1161VBNbe
in1162INin
the1163DTthe
same1164JJsame
situation1165NNsituation
?1166SENT?
After1167INafter
all1168PDTall
this1169DTthis
is1170VBZbe
a1171DTa
small1172JJsmall
credit1173NNcredit
.1174SENT.
It1175PPit
's1176VBZbe
$1177$$
1501178CD@card@
.1179SENT.
And1180CCand
if1181INif
they1182PPthey
do1183VVPdo
n't1184RBn't
get1185VVget
the1186DTthe
credit1187NNcredit
,1188,,
if1189INif
the1190DTthe
donors1191NNSdonor
to1192TOto
the1193DTthe
organizations1194NNSorganization
do1195VVPdo
n't1196RBn't
get1197VVget
the1198DTthe
credit1199NNcredit
,1200,,
they1201PPthey
still1202RBstill
get1203VVPget
a1204DTa
tax1205NNtax
deduction1206NNdeduction
.1207SENT.
And1208CCand
that1209DTthat
tax1210NNtax
deduction1211NNdeduction
is1212VBZbe
uncapped1213VVNuncap
.1214SENT.
So1215RBso
how1216WRBhow
can1217MDcan
we1218PPwe
even1219RBeven
assume1220VVPassume
that1221IN/thatthat
there1222EXthere
's1223VBZbe
going1224VVGgo
to1225TOto
be1226VBbe
less1227JJRless
money1228NNmoney
in1229INin
the1230DTthe
kitty1231NNkitty
if1232INif
the1233DTthe
credit1234NNcredit
is1235VBZbe
removed1236VVNremove
but1237CCbut
the1238DTthe
tax1239NNtax
deduction1240NNdeduction
remains1241VVZremain
untouched1242JJuntouched
?1243SENT?
And1244CCand
I1245PPI
'm1246VBPbe
looking1247VVGlook
at1248INat
Wright1249NPWright
against1250INagainst
Allen1251NPAllen
in1252INin
Eastern1253NPEastern
Kentucky1254NPKentucky
and1255CCand
I1256PPI
just1257RBjust
do1258VVPdo
n't1259RBn't
understand1260VVunderstand
how1261WRBhow
this1262DTthis
case1263NNcase
passes1264VVZpass
the1265DTthe
standing1266NNstanding
bar1267NNbar
when1268WRBwhen
those1269DTthose
did1270VVDdo
n't1271RBn't
.1272SENT.
[MR. KOMER]1273LOC[MR. KOMER]
Well1274UHWell
,1275,,
Your1276PP$your
Honor1277NPHonor
,1278,,
the1279DTthe
simple1280JJsimple
fact1281NNfact
of1282INof
the1283DTthe
matter1284NNmatter
is1285VBZbe
that1286IN/thatthat
our1287PP$our
clients1288NNSclient
received1289VVDreceive
scholarships1290NNSscholarship
under1291INunder
this1292DTthis
program1293NNprogram
,1294,,
which1295WDTwhich
was1296VBDbe
a1297DTa
financial1298JJfinancial
benefit1299NNbenefit
to1300TOto
them1301PPthem
.1302SENT.
The1303DTthe
...1304:...
the1305DTthe
...1306:...
the1307DTthe
tax1308NNtax
deductions1309NNSdeduction
are1310VBPbe
not1311RBnot
a1312DTa
financial1313JJfinancial
benefit1314NNbenefit
to1315TOto
the1316DTthe
taxpayer1317NNtaxpayer
because1318INbecause
they1319PPthey
are1320VBPbe
out1321RBout
$1322$$
1501323CD@card@
,1324,,
whether1325INwhether
they1326PPthey
pay1327VVPpay
their1328PP$their
tax1329NNtax
to1330TOto
the1331DTthe
state1332NNstate
or1333CCor
they1334PPthey
donate1335VVPdonate
$1336$$
1501337CD@card@
to1338TOto
the1339DTthe
scholarship1340NNscholarship
organization1341NNorganization
.1342SENT.
There1343EXthere
's1344VBZbe
no1345DTno
financial1346JJfinancial
benefit1347NNbenefit
to1348TOto
them1349PPthem
.1350SENT.
It1351PPit
's1352VBZbe
kind1353NNkind
of1354INof
a1355DTa
psychic1356JJpsychic
benefit1357NNbenefit
.1358SENT.
But1359CCbut
it1360PPit
creates1361VVZcreate
scholarships1362NNSscholarship
.1363SENT.
It1364PPit
really1365RBreally
created1366VVDcreate
scholarships1367NNSscholarship
.1368SENT.
And1369CCand
...1370:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1371LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Mr1372NPMr
.1373SENT.
Komer1374NPKomer
,1375,,
can1376MDcan
I1377PPI
go1378VVgo
back1379RBback
to1380TOto
Justice1381NPJustice
Ginsburg1382NPGinsburg
's1383POS's
first1384JJfirst
question1385NNquestion
?1386SENT?
And1387CCand
I1388PPI
do1389VVPdo
n't1390RBn't
know1391VVknow
whether1392INwhether
to1393TOto
call1394VVcall
it1395PPit
standing1396NNstanding
or1397CCor
mootness1398NNmootness
or1399CCor
anything1400NNanything
else1401RBelse
,1402,,
but1403CCbut
I1404PPI
guess1405VVPguess
I1406PPI
am1407VBPbe
having1408VHGhave
trouble1409JJtrouble
seeing1410VVGsee
where1411WRBwhere
the1412DTthe
harm1413NNharm
in1414INin
this1415DTthis
case1416NNcase
is1417VBZbe
at1418INat
this1419DTthis
point1420NNpoint
.1421SENT.
It1422PPit
's1423VBZbe
a1424DTa
strange1425JJstrange
kind1426NNkind
of1427INof
posture1428NNposture
wherein1429RBwherein
,1430,,
but1431CCbut
if1432INif
you1433PPyou
would1434MDwould
describe1435VVdescribe
to1436TOto
me1437PPme
what1438WPwhat
is1439VBZbe
the1440DTthe
harm1441NNharm
that1442IN/thatthat
the1443DTthe
parents1444NNSparent
are1445VBPbe
suffering1446VVGsuffer
right1447RBright
now1448RBnow
currently1449RBcurrently
?1450SENT?
[MR. KOMER]1451LOC[MR. KOMER]
Well1452UHWell
,1453,,
right1454RBright
now1455RBnow
,1456,,
their1457PP$their
students1458NNSstudent
...1459:...
two1460CDtwo
of1461INof
the1462DTthe
families1463NNSfamily
'1464POS'
students1465NNSstudent
are1466VBPbe
on1467INon
scholarships1468NNSscholarship
and1469CCand
next1470JJnext
year1471NNyear
they1472PPthey
won1473MDwill
't1474RB't
be1475VBbe
...1476:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1477LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Right1478RBright
.1479SENT.
But1480CCbut
I1481PPI
guess1482VVPguess
...1483:...
[MR. KOMER]1484LOC[MR. KOMER]
...1485:...
generated1486VVNgenerate
by1487INby
the1488DTthe
program1489NNprogram
.1490SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1491LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
I1492PPI
'm1493VBPbe
sorry1494JJsorry
to1495TOto
interrupt1496VVinterrupt
.1497SENT.
I1498PPI
guess1499VVPguess
what1500WPwhat
I'm1501NNI'm
...1502:...
I1503PPI
'm1504VBPbe
saying1505VVGsay
is1506VBZbe
that1507IN/thatthat
because1508INbecause
of1509INof
the1510DTthe
supreme1511JJsupreme
court1512NNcourt
's1513POS's
ruling1514NNruling
,1515,,
whether1516INwhether
you1517PPyou
go1518VVPgo
to1519TOto
a1520DTa
religious1521JJreligious
school1522NNschool
or1523CCor
you1524PPyou
go1525VVPgo
to1526TOto
a1527DTa
secular1528JJsecular
private1529JJprivate
school1530NNschool
,1531,,
you1532PPyou
're1533VBPbe
in1534INin
the1535DTthe
same1536JJsame
boat1537NNboat
at1538INat
this1539DTthis
point1540NNpoint
.1541SENT.
So1542RBso
I1543PPI
've1544VHPhave
always1545RBalways
understood1546VVNunderstand
in1547INin
these1548DTthese
kinds1549NNSkind
of1550INof
cases1551NNScase
that1552IN/thatthat
the1553DTthe
harm1554NNharm
is1555VBZbe
the1556DTthe
perceived1557VVNperceive
or1558CCor
alleged1559VVNallege
or1560CCor
actual1561JJactual
...1562:...
whatever1563WDTwhatever
you1564PPyou
want1565VVPwant
to1566TOto
call1567VVcall
it1568PPit
...1569:...
discrimination1570NNdiscrimination
.1571SENT.
But1572CCbut
there1573EXthere
is1574VBZbe
no1575DTno
discrimination1576NNdiscrimination
at1577INat
this1578DTthis
point1579NNpoint
going1580VVGgo
on1581INon
,1582,,
is1583VBZbe
there1584RBthere
?1585SENT?
[MR. KOMER]1586LOC[MR. KOMER]
Yes1587NPYes
,1588,,
there1589EXthere
is1590VBZbe
.1591SENT.
Because1592INbecause
the1593DTthe
discrimination1594NNdiscrimination
occurred1595VVDoccur
in1596INin
the1597DTthe
judgment1598NNjudgment
of1599INof
the1600DTthe
Montana1601NPMontana
Supreme1602NPSupreme
Court1603NPCourt
which1604WDTwhich
considered1605VVDconsider
a1606DTa
federal1607JJfederal
question1608NNquestion
,1609,,
which1610WDTwhich
led1611VVDlead
to1612TOto
the1613DTthe
invalidation1614NNinvalidation
of1615INof
the1616DTthe
program1617NNprogram
.1618SENT.
And1619CCand
they1620PPthey
...1621:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1622LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But1623CCbut
it1624PPit
led1625VVDlead
to1626TOto
the1627DTthe
invalidation1628NNinvalidation
of1629INof
the1630DTthe
entire1631JJentire
program1632NNprogram
as1633INas
it1634PPit
related1635VVDrelate
both1636DTboth
to1637TOto
private1638JJprivate
secular1639JJsecular
schools1640NNSschool
and1641CCand
private1642JJprivate
religious1643JJreligious
schools1644NNSschool
.1645SENT.
So1646RBso
a1647DTa
...1648:...
a1649DTa
...1650:...
a1651DTa
...1652:...
a1653DTa
...1654:...
the1655DTthe
parents1656NNSparent
of1657INof
both1658CCboth
are1659VBPbe
affected1660VVNaffect
in1661INin
the1662DTthe
exact1663JJexact
same1664JJsame
way1665NNway
.1666SENT.
[MR. KOMER]1667LOC[MR. KOMER]
That1668DTthat
's1669VBZbe
because1670INbecause
the1671DTthe
remedy1672NNremedy
...1673:...
you1674PPyou
can1675MDcan
't1676RB't
let1677VVlet
the1678DTthe
remedy1679NNremedy
shield1680VVshield
the1681DTthe
discriminatory1682JJdiscriminatory
judgment1683NNjudgment
.1684SENT.
The1685DTthe
discriminatory1686JJdiscriminatory
judgment1687NNjudgment
is1688VBZbe
in1689INin
mistakenly1690RBmistakenly
believing1691VVGbelieve
that1692IN/thatthat
this1693DTthis
Blaine1694NPBlaine
Amendment1695NPAmendment
and1696CCand
the1697DTthe
application1698NNapplication
of1699INof
it1700PPit
did1701VVDdo
not1702RBnot
violate1703VVviolate
the1704DTthe
Federal1705NPFederal
Constitution1706NPConstitution
.1707SENT.
If1708INif
they1709PPthey
got1710VVDget
that1711IN/thatthat
question1712NNquestion
right1713NNright
,1714,,
we1715PPwe
would1716MDwould
n't1717RBn't
be1718VBbe
here1719RBhere
.1720SENT.
Because1721INbecause
the1722DTthe
program1723NNprogram
would1724MDwould
still1725RBstill
be1726VBbe
going1727VVGgo
on1728INon
and1729CCand
our1730PP$our
parents1731NNSparent
would1732MDwould
be1733VBbe
...1734:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1735LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I1736PPI
'm1737VBPbe
sorry1738JJsorry
,1739,,
how1740WRBhow
could1741MDcould
that1742RBthat
be1743VBbe
?1744SENT?
Meaning1745NNmeaning
,1746,,
do1747VVdo
you1748PPyou
...1749:...
are1750VBPbe
you1751PPyou
taking1752VVGtake
the1753DTthe
position1754NNposition
that1755IN/thatthat
as1756INas
a1757DTa
matter1758NNmatter
of1759INof
constitutional1760JJconstitutional
law1761NNlaw
,1762,,
the1763DTthe
Montana1764NPMontana
Supreme1765NPSupreme
Court1766NPCourt
constitutional1767JJconstitutional
provision1768NNprovision
is1769VBZbe
unconstitutional1770JJunconstitutional
?1771SENT?
That1772DTthat
...1773:...
that1774IN/thatthat
states1775NNSstate
are1776VBPbe
forced1777VVNforce
to1778TOto
give1779VVgive
money1780NNmoney
,1781,,
tax1782NNtax
credits1783NNScredit
,1784,,
to1785TOto
religious1786JJreligious
institutions1787NNSinstitution
and1788CCand
secular1789JJsecular
institutions1790NNSinstitution
?1791SENT?
Are1792VBPbe
they1793PPthey
required1794VVNrequire
always1795RBalways
to1796TOto
give1797VVgive
money1798NNmoney
out1799RBout
,1800,,
scholarships1801NNSscholarship
?1802SENT?
[MR. KOMER]1803LOC[MR. KOMER]
No1804NPNo
.1805SENT.
No1806UHNo
,1807,,
Your1808PP$your
Honor1809NPHonor
.1810SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1811LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
All1812DTall
right1813NNright
.1814SENT.
So1815RBso
let1816VVlet
's1817VBZbe
start1818VVstart
there1819RBthere
.1820SENT.
Are1821VBPbe
you1822PPyou
saying1823VVGsay
that1824IN/thatthat
the1825DTthe
constitutional1826JJconstitutional
...1827:...
the1828DTthe
constitution1829NNconstitution
is1830VBZbe
unconstitutional1831JJunconstitutional
?1832SENT?
Meaning1833VVGmean
that1834IN/thatthat
the1835DTthe
constitutional1836JJconstitutional
...1837:...
Montana1838NPMontana
's1839POS's
constitutional1840JJconstitutional
provision1841NNprovision
is1842VBZbe
unconstitutional1843JJunconstitutional
.1844SENT.
[MR. KOMER]1845LOC[MR. KOMER]
Montana1846NPMontana
's1847POS's
constitutional1848JJconstitutional
provision1849NNprovision
violates1850VVZviolate
the1851DTthe
free-exercise1852NNfree-exercise
clause1853NNclause
on1854INon
its1855PP$its
face1856NNface
.1857SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1858LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
On1859INon
its1860PP$its
face1861NNface
.1862SENT.
[MR. KOMER]1863LOC[MR. KOMER]
And1864CCand
as1865RBas
applied1866VVNapply
to1867TOto
this1868DTthis
program1869NNprogram
.1870SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1871LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So1872INso
you1873PPyou
are1874VBPbe
saying1875VVGsay
that1876IN/thatthat
states1877NNSstate
are1878VBPbe
forced1879VVNforce
to1880TOto
give1881VVgive
money1882NNmoney
both1883CCboth
to1884TOto
secular1885JJsecular
and1886CCand
religious1887JJreligious
schools1888NNSschool
?1889SENT?
[MR. KOMER]1890LOC[MR. KOMER]
It1891PPit
...1892:...
not1893RBnot
to1894TOto
the1895DTthe
schools1896NNSschool
.1897SENT.
This1898DTthis
is1899VBZbe
a1900DTa
case1901NNcase
about1902INabout
giving1903VVGgive
the1904DTthe
money1905NNmoney
to1906TOto
the1907DTthe
families1908NNSfamily
.1909SENT.
It1910PPit
's1911VBZbe
not1912RBnot
a1913DTa
case1914NNcase
about1915RBabout
...1916:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1917LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I1918PPI
do1919VVPdo
n't1920RBn't
...1921:...
[MR. KOMER]1922LOC[MR. KOMER]
...1923:...
giving1924VVGgive
money1925NNmoney
to1926TOto
the1927DTthe
schools1928NNSschool
.1929SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1930LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Secular1931JJsecular
and1932CCand
religious1933JJreligious
families1934NNSfamily
?1935SENT?
[MR. KOMER]1936LOC[MR. KOMER]
Yes1937NPYes
,1938,,
if1939INif
they1940PPthey
give1941VVPgive
to1942TOto
one1943CDone
,1944,,
they1945PPthey
must1946MDmust
give1947VVgive
to1948TOto
the1949DTthe
other1950JJother
.1951SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1952LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But1953CCbut
can1954MDcan
the1955DTthe
state1956NNstate
choose1957VVchoose
not1958RBnot
to1959TOto
give1960VVgive
at1961INat
all1962DTall
?1963SENT?
[MR. KOMER]1964LOC[MR. KOMER]
Yes1965NPYes
.1966SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1967LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
All1968DTall
right1969NNright
.1970SENT.
So1971RBso
let1972VVNlet
's1973VBZbe
...1974:...
if1975INif
you1976PPyou
start1977VVPstart
from1978INfrom
that1979DTthat
proposition1980NNproposition
,1981,,
the1982DTthe
Montana1983NPMontana
court1984NNcourt
said1985VVDsay
we1986PPwe
do1987VVPdo
n't1988RBn't
have1989VHhave
a1990DTa
law1991NNlaw
now1992RBnow
,1993,,
do1994VVPdo
n't1995RBn't
give1996VVgive
to1997TOto
any1998DTany
.1999SENT.
So2000RBso
let2001VVlet
's2002VBZbe
assume2003VVassume
that2004IN/thatthat
the2005DTthe
Montana2006NPMontana
court2007NNcourt
did2008VVDdo
what2009WPwhat
you2010PPyou
wanted2011VVDwant
it2012PPit
to2013TOto
do2014VVdo
and2015CCand
said2016VVDsay
:2017::
This2018DTthis
is2019VBZbe
unconstitutional2020JJunconstitutional
under2021INunder
the2022DTthe
Federal2023NPFederal
Constitution2024NPConstitution
,2025,,
and2026CCand
it2027PPit
's2028VBZbe
unconstitutional2029JJunconstitutional
under2030INunder
the2031DTthe
Montana2032NPMontana
Constitution2033NPConstitution
,2034,,
which2035WDTwhich
is2036VBZbe
what2037WPwhat
I2038PPI
think2039VVPthink
it2040PPit
did2041VVDdo
,2042,,
by2043INby
the2044DTthe
way2045NNway
.2046SENT.
It2047PPit
said2048VVDsay
it2049PPit
's2050VBZbe
unconstitutional2051JJunconstitutional
under2052INunder
both2053DTboth
,2054,,
even2055RBeven
if2056INif
it2057PPit
did2058VVDdo
n't2059RBn't
say2060VVsay
it2061PPit
,2062,,
but2063CCbut
let2064VVlet
's2065VBZbe
assume2066VVassume
it2067PPit
.2068SENT.
Let2069VVlet
's2070VBZbe
assume2071VVassume
it2072PPit
says2073VVZsay
it2074PPit
's2075VBZbe
unconstitutional2076JJunconstitutional
under2077INunder
the2078DTthe
federal2079JJfederal
constitution2080NNconstitution
.2081SENT.
You2082PPyou
're2083VBPbe
saying2084VVGsay
they2085PPthey
can2086MDcan
't2087RB't
say2088VVPsay
separately2089RBseparately
it2090PPit
's2091VBZbe
unconstitutional2092JJunconstitutional
under2093INunder
the2094DTthe
Montana2095NPMontana
Constitution2096NPConstitution
?2097SENT?
They2098PPthey
have2099VHPhave
to2100TOto
keep2101VVkeep
the2102DTthe
program2103NNprogram
alive2104RBalive
?2105SENT?
[MR. KOMER]2106LOC[MR. KOMER]
In2107INin
the2108DTthe
circumstances2109NNScircumstance
we2110PPwe
're2111VBPbe
dealing2112VVGdeal
with2113INwith
,2114,,
Your2115PP$your
Honor2116NPHonor
,2117,,
they2118PPthey
terminated2119VVDterminate
the2120DTthe
program2121NNprogram
.2122SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2123LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I2124PPI
'm2125VBPbe
not2126RBnot
talking2127VVGtalk
about2128INabout
the2129DTthe
circumstances2130NNScircumstance
.2131SENT.
Let2132VVlet
's2133VBZbe
assume2134VVassume
their2135PP$their
opinion2136NNopinion
was2137VBDbe
written2138VVNwrite
exactly2139RBexactly
the2140DTthe
way2141NNway
you2142PPyou
want2143VVPwant
it2144PPit
to2145TOto
be2146VBbe
,2147,,
and2148CCand
they2149PPthey
had2150VHDhave
said2151VVNsay
,2152,,
this2153DTthis
violates2154VVZviolate
the2155DTthe
Federal2156NPFederal
Constitution2157NPConstitution
,2158,,
but2159CCbut
it2160PPit
also2161RBalso
violates2162VVZviolate
the2163DTthe
Montana2164NPMontana
Constitution2165NPConstitution
.2166SENT.
So2167RBso
instead2168RBinstead
of2169INof
leveling2170VVGlevel
up2171RPup
the2172DTthe
way2173NNway
Justice2174NPJustice
Ginsburg2175NPGinsburg
said2176VVDsay
,2177,,
we2178PPwe
're2179VBPbe
going2180VVGgo
to2181TOto
level2182VVlevel
down2183RPdown
.2184SENT.
That2185DTthat
way2186NNway
it2187PPit
does2188VVZdo
n't2189RBn't
violate2190VVviolate
either2191RBeither
of2192INof
them2193PPthem
.2194SENT.
It2195PPit
...2196:...
we2197PPwe
stopped2198VVDstop
the2199DTthe
federal2200JJfederal
violation2201NNviolation
because2202INbecause
we2203PPwe
're2204VBPbe
not2205RBnot
discriminating2206VVGdiscriminate
against2207INagainst
the2208DTthe
school2209NNschool
...2210:...
any2211DTany
school2212NNschool
.2213SENT.
And2214CCand
we2215PPwe
've2216VHPhave
now2217RBnow
...2218:...
not2219RBnot
violating2220VVGviolate
the2221DTthe
Colorado2222NPColorado
Constitution2223NPConstitution
.2224SENT.
Can2225MDcan
they2226PPthey
do2227VVdo
that2228DTthat
?2229SENT?
[MR. KOMER]2230LOC[MR. KOMER]
Are2231VBPbe
we2232PPwe
talking2233VVGtalk
about2234INabout
the2235DTthe
court2236NNcourt
doing2237VVGdo
this2238DTthis
or2239CCor
...2240:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2241LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
To2242TOTo
the2243DTthe
court2244NNcourt
doing2245VVGdo
this2246DTthis
.2247SENT.
[MR. KOMER]2248LOC[MR. KOMER]
Can2249MDcan
the2250DTthe
court2251NNcourt
do2252VVPdo
it2253PPit
,2254,,
no2255UHno
?2256SENT?
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2257LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Why2258NPWhy
?2259SENT?
[MR. KOMER]2260LOC[MR. KOMER]
Because2261INbecause
when2262WRBwhen
you2263PPyou
have2264VHPhave
a2265DTa
constitutional2266JJconstitutional
conflict2267NNconflict
between2268INbetween
the2269DTthe
two2270CDtwo
constitutions2271NNSconstitution
,2272,,
the2273DTthe
Federal2274NPFederal
Constitution2275NPConstitution
trumps2276NNStrump
...2277:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2278LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But2279CCbut
you2280PPyou
just2281RBjust
told2282VVDtell
me2283PPme
the2284DTthe
Federal2285NPFederal
Constitution2286NPConstitution
does2287VVZdo
n't2288RBn't
stop2289VVstop
the2290DTthe
state2291NNstate
from2292INfrom
choosing2293VVGchoose
not2294RBnot
to2295TOto
give2296VVgive
aid2297NNaid
.2298SENT.
[MR. KOMER]2299LOC[MR. KOMER]
That2300DTthat
's2301VBZbe
right2302JJright
.2303SENT.
But2304CCbut
here2305RBhere
the2306DTthe
state2307NNstate
chose2308VVDchoose
to2309TOto
give2310VVgive
aid2311NNaid
and2312CCand
it2313PPit
has2314VHZhave
been2315VBNbe
stopped2316VVNstop
from2317INfrom
giving2318VVGgive
aid2319NNaid
to2320TOto
our2321PP$our
clients2322NNSclient
.2323SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]2324LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well2325UHwell
,2326,,
it2327PPit
chose2328VVDchoose
to2329TOto
give2330VVgive
aid2331NNaid
consistent2332JJconsistent
with2333INwith
the2334DTthe
constitutional2335JJconstitutional
amendment2336NNamendment
.2337SENT.
And2338CCand
...2339:...
and2340CCand
...2341:...
and2342CCand
the2343DTthe
constitutional2344JJconstitutional
amendment2345NNamendment
sets2346VVZset
restrictions2347NNSrestriction
on2348INon
funds2349NNSfund
.2350SENT.
And2351CCand
,2352,,
as2353INas
a2354DTa
result2355NNresult
of2356INof
the2357DTthe
restrictions2358NNSrestriction
on2359INon
funds2360NNSfund
that2361IN/thatthat
the2362DTthe
constitutional2363JJconstitutional
amendment2364NNamendment
set2365NNset
,2366,,
in2367INin
this2368DTthis
case2369NNcase
,2370,,
which2371WDTwhich
I2372PPI
have2373VHPhave
always2374RBalways
understood2375VVNunderstand
to2376TOto
be2377VBbe
a2378DTa
challenge2379NNchallenge
to2380TOto
the2381DTthe
way2382NNway
that2383IN/thatthat
the2384DTthe
constitutional2385JJconstitutional
amendment2386NNamendment
operated2387VVNoperate
on2388INon
a2389DTa
particular2390JJparticular
program2391NNprogram
,2392,,
as2393INas
a2394DTa
result2395NNresult
of2396INof
this2397DTthis
challenge2398NNchallenge
,2399,,
what2400WPwhat
has2401VHZhave
happened2402VVNhappen
is2403VBZbe
that2404IN/thatthat
neither2405CCneither
the2406DTthe
parents2407NNSparent
who2408WPwho
want2409VVPwant
to2410TOto
send2411VVsend
their2412PP$their
children2413NNSchild
to2414TOto
religious2415JJreligious
schools2416NNSschool
nor2417CCnor
the2418DTthe
parents2419NNSparent
who2420WPwho
want2421VVPwant
to2422TOto
send2423VVsend
their2424PP$their
children2425NNSchild
to2426TOto
secular2427JJsecular
schools2428NNSschool
get2429VVPget
what2430WPwhat
they2431PPthey
would2432MDwould
like2433VVlike
to2434TOto
get2435VVget
.2436SENT.
So2437RBso
they2438PPthey
're2439VBPbe
both2440CCboth
being2441VBGbe
treated2442VVNtreat
the2443DTthe
same2444JJsame
way2445NNway
.2446SENT.
[MR. KOMER]2447LOC[MR. KOMER]
Only2448RBonly
as2449INas
a2450DTa
result2451NNresult
of2452INof
a2453DTa
mistaken2454JJmistaken
understanding2455NNunderstanding
of2456INof
the2457DTthe
free-exercise2458NNfree-exercise
clause2459NNclause
,2460,,
Your2461PP$your
Honor2462NPHonor
.2463SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]2464LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Under2465INunder
...2466:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]2467LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But2468CCbut
we2469PPwe
do2470VVPdo
n't2471RBn't
usually2472RBusually
...2473:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]2474LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
...2475:...
under2476INunder
...2477:...
go2478VVgo
ahead2479RBahead
.2480SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]2481LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
I2482PPI
mean2483VVPmean
,2484,,
we2485PPwe
do2486VVPdo
n't2487RBn't
usually2488RBusually
sort2489VVsort
of2490INof
grade2491NNgrade
every2492DTevery
line2493NNline
of2494INof
an2495DTan
opinion2496NNopinion
.2497SENT.
Usually2498RBusually
we2499PPwe
look2500VVPlook
to2501TOto
an2502DTan
opinion2503NNopinion
,2504,,
and2505CCand
...2506:...
and2507CCand
...2508:...
and2509CCand
...2510:...
and2511CCand
there2512EXthere
's2513VBZbe
a2514DTa
decision2515NNdecision
below2516RBbelow
,2517,,
and2518CCand
it2519PPit
's2520VHZhave
had2521VHNhave
a2522DTa
consequence2523NNconsequence
in2524INin
the2525DTthe
world2526NNworld
.2527SENT.
And2528CCand
the2529DTthe
consequence2530NNconsequence
of2531INof
this2532DTthis
decision2533NNdecision
is2534VBZbe
that2535IN/thatthat
there2536EXthere
is2537VBZbe
no2538DTno
discrimination2539NNdiscrimination
,2540,,
that2541IN/thatthat
neither2542DTneither
...2543:...
that2544IN/thatthat
neither2545DTneither
set2546NNset
of2547INof
parents2548NNSparent
is2549VBZbe
getting2550VVGget
what2551WPwhat
it2552PPit
...2553:...
they2554PPthey
want2555VVPwant
.2556SENT.
Now2557RBnow
,2558,,
you2559PPyou
might2560MDmight
say2561VVsay
,2562,,
well2563RBwell
,2564,,
both2565CCboth
should2566MDshould
get2567VVget
what2568WPwhat
they2569PPthey
want2570VVPwant
,2571,,
and2572CCand
maybe2573RBmaybe
that2574WDTthat
would2575MDwould
be2576VBbe
a2577DTa
better2578JJRgood
world2579NNworld
.2580SENT.
Maybe2581RBmaybe
.2582SENT.
But2583CCbut
the2584DTthe
constitutional2585JJconstitutional
harm2586NNharm
that2587IN/thatthat
it2588PPit
seems2589VVZseem
that2590IN/thatthat
you2591PPyou
have2592VHPhave
to2593TOto
allege2594VVallege
here2595RBhere
is2596VBZbe
the2597DTthe
discrimination2598NNdiscrimination
.2599SENT.
And2600CCand
there2601EXthere
is2602VBZbe
no2603DTno
discrimination2604NNdiscrimination
.2605SENT.
[MR. KOMER]2606LOC[MR. KOMER]
Your2607PP$your
Honor2608NPHonor
,2609,,
there2610EXthere
is2611VBZbe
no2612DTno
discrimination2613NNdiscrimination
because2614INbecause
the2615DTthe
Montana2616NPMontana
constitutional2617JJconstitutional
provision2618NNprovision
requires2619VVZrequire
discrimination2620NNdiscrimination
on2621INon
its2622PP$its
face2623NNface
and2624CCand
as2625RBas
applied2626VVNapply
to2627TOto
our2628PP$our
clients2629NNSclient
.2630SENT.
And2631CCand
,2632,,
if2633INif
I2634PPI
can2635MDcan
point2636VVpoint
out2637RPout
,2638,,
this2639DTthis
is2640VBZbe
n't2641RBn't
a2642DTa
decision2643NNdecision
about2644INabout
harmonizing2645VVGharmonize
the2646DTthe
two2647CDtwo
constitutions2648NNSconstitution
because2649INbecause
the2650DTthe
Montana2651NPMontana
Supreme2652NPSupreme
Court2653NPCourt
did2654VVDdo
not2655RBnot
recognize2656VVrecognize
there2657EXthere
was2658VBDbe
any2659DTany
conflict2660NNconflict
between2661INbetween
them2662PPthem
that2663WDTthat
had2664VHDhave
to2665TOto
be2666VBbe
harmonized2667VVNharmonize
at2668INat
all2669DTall
.2670SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2671LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Justice2672NPJustice
Alito2673NPAlito
?2674SENT?
[JUSTICE ALITO]2675LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Yeah2676UHYeah
,2677,,
I2678PPI
just2679RBjust
wanted2680VVDwant
to2681TOto
ask2682VVask
this2683DTthis
simple2684JJsimple
question2685NNquestion
:2686::
Under2687INunder
our2688PP$our
decision2689NNdecision
in2690INin
Village2691NPVillage
of2692INof
Arlington2693NPArlington
Heights2694NPHeights
,2695,,
is2696VBZbe
it2697PPit
constitutional2698JJconstitutional
for2699INfor
a2700DTa
unit2701NNunit
of2702INof
state2703NNstate
government2704NNgovernment
to2705TOto
do2706VVdo
something2707NNsomething
that2708IN/thatthat
it2709PPit
could2710MDcould
do2711VVdo
,2712,,
but2713CCbut
if2714INif
it2715PPit
does2716VVZdo
it2717PPit
for2718INfor
an2719DTan
unconstitutional2720JJunconstitutional
discriminatory2721JJdiscriminatory
reason2722NNreason
,2723,,
is2724VBZbe
it2725PPit
then2726RBthen
unconstitutional2727JJunconstitutional
?2728SENT?
[MR. KOMER]2729LOC[MR. KOMER]
Yes2730NPYes
,2731,,
it2732PPit
is2733VBZbe
,2734,,
Your2735PP$your
Honor2736NPHonor
.2737SENT.
I2738PPI
see2739VVPsee
the2740DTthe
light2741NNlight
is2742VBZbe
on2743INon
.2744SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2745LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank2746VVthank
you2747PPyou
,2748,,
counsel2749NNcounsel
.2750SENT.
Mr2751NPMr
.2752SENT.
Wall2753NPWall
.2754SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]2755LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Mr2756NPMr
.2757SENT.
Chief2758NPChief
Justice2759NPJustice
and2760CCand
may2761MDmay
it2762PPit
please2763VVplease
the2764DTthe
Court2765NPCourt
:2766::
The2767DTthe
Montana2768NPMontana
Supreme2769NPSupreme
Court2770NPCourt
held2771VVDhold
that2772IN/thatthat
the2773DTthe
Montana2774NPMontana
constitution2775NNconstitution
requires2776VVZrequire
religious2777JJreligious
discrimination2778NNdiscrimination
that2779IN/thatthat
the2780DTthe
federal2781JJfederal
constitution2782NNconstitution
forbids2783VVZforbid
.2784SENT.
Parents2785NNSparent
may2786MDmay
not2787RBnot
direct2788VVdirect
scholarships2789NNSscholarship
to2790TOto
schools2791NNSschool
solely2792RBsolely
because2793INbecause
those2794DTthose
schools2795NNSschool
are2796VBPbe
religiously2797RBreligiously
affiliated2798VVNaffiliate
.2799SENT.
Now2800RBnow
,2801,,
the2802DTthe
state2803NNstate
does2804VVZdo
n't2805RBn't
defend2806VVdefend
that2807DTthat
error2808NNerror
of2809INof
federal2810JJfederal
law2811NNlaw
,2812,,
but2813CCbut
says2814VVZsay
it2815PPit
was2816VBDbe
washed2817VVNwash
away2818RBaway
when2819WRBwhen
the2820DTthe
court2821NNcourt
invalidated2822VVDinvalidate
the2823DTthe
entire2824JJentire
program2825NNprogram
and2826CCand
left2827VVDleave
everyone2828NNeveryone
empty-handed2829JJempty-handed
.2830SENT.
The2831DTthe
Montana2832NPMontana
Supreme2833NPSupreme
Court2834NPCourt
had2835VHDhave
no2836DTno
power2837NNpower
under2838INunder
federal2839JJfederal
law2840NNlaw
to2841TOto
invalidate2842VVinvalidate
anything2843NNanything
.2844SENT.
It2845PPit
relied2846VVDrely
on2847INon
a2848DTa
state2849NNstate
constitutional2850JJconstitutional
provision2851NNprovision
that2852WDTthat
is2853VBZbe
inconsistent2854JJinconsistent
with2855INwith
and2856CCand
preempted2857VVNpreempt
by2858INby
the2859DTthe
federal2860JJfederal
free-exercise2861NNfree-exercise
clause2862NNclause
,2863,,
and2864CCand
,2865,,
crucially2866RBcrucially
,2867,,
Petitioners2868NNSpetitioner
continue2869VVPcontinue
to2870TOto
suffer2871VVsuffer
from2872INfrom
that2873DTthat
federal2874JJfederal
free2875JJfree
exercise2876NNexercise
violation2877NNviolation
regardless2878RBregardless
of2879INof
whether2880INwhether
any2881DTany
parents2882NNSparent
received2883VVDreceive
scholarships2884NNSscholarship
or2885CCor
also2886RBalso
suffer2887VVsuffer
as2888INas
collateral2889NNcollateral
damage2890NNdamage
.2891SENT.
If2892INif
the2893DTthe
Montana2894NPMontana
Supreme2895NPSupreme
Court2896NPCourt
had2897VHDhave
invalidated2898VVNinvalidate
this2899DTthis
program2900NNprogram
because2901INbecause
it2902PPit
included2903VVDinclude
historically2904RBhistorically
African-American2905NPAfrican-American
schools2906NNSschool
or2907CCor
all-girl2908NNall-girl
schools2909NNSschool
,2910,,
that2911WDTthat
would2912MDwould
be2913VBbe
a2914DTa
straightforward2915JJstraightforward
equal-protection2916NNequal-protection
violation2917NNviolation
.2918SENT.
Nothing2919NNnothing
about2920INabout
it2921PPit
would2922MDwould
be2923VBbe
cured2924VVNcure
by2925INby
the2926DTthe
fact2927NNfact
that2928IN/thatthat
other2929JJother
parents2930NNSparent
had2931VHDhave
been2932VBNbe
denied2933VVNdeny
funding2934VVGfund
as2935RBas
well2936RBwell
.2937SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2938LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
So2939INso
your2940PP$your
...2941:...
your2942PP$your
...2943:...
I2944PPI
'm2945VBPbe
sorry2946JJsorry
.2947SENT.
Oh2948UHoh
,2949,,
you2950PPyou
're2951VBPbe
good2952JJgood
.2953SENT.
The2954DTthe
injury2955NNinjury
flows2956VVZflow
through2957INthrough
the2958DTthe
schools2959NNSschool
,2960,,
right2961RBright
?2962SENT?
I2963PPI
mean2964VVPmean
,2965,,
the2966DTthe
money2967NNmoney
would2968MDwould
go2969VVgo
to2970TOto
the2971DTthe
schools2972NNSschool
,2973,,
not2974RBnot
to2975TOto
the2976DTthe
parents2977NNSparent
.2978SENT.
And2979CCand
we2980PPwe
do2981VVPdo
n't2982RBn't
have2983VHhave
a2984DTa
school2985NNschool
in2986INin
this2987DTthis
case2988NNcase
.2989SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]2990LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Well2991UHWell
,2992,,
but2993CCbut
I2994PPI
think2995VVPthink
that2996WDTthat
's2997VBZbe
really2998RBreally
getting2999VVGget
at3000INat
the3001DTthe
standing3002NNstanding
issue3003NNissue
,3004,,
Mr3005NPMr
.3006SENT.
Chief3007NPChief
Justice3008NPJustice
.3009SENT.
And3010CCand
they3011PPthey
're3012VBPbe
losing3013VVGlose
their3014PP$their
scholarships3015NNSscholarship
at3016INat
the3017DTthe
end3018NNend
of3019INof
the3020DTthe
school3021NNschool
year3022NNyear
,3023,,
as3024INas
I3025PPI
understand3026VVPunderstand
it3027PPit
.3028SENT.
They3029PPthey
've3030VHPhave
had3031VHDhave
them3032PPthem
for3033INfor
years3034NNSyear
,3035,,
and3036CCand
under3037INunder
the3038DTthe
court3039NNcourt
's3040POS's
decision3041NNdecision
,3042,,
they3043PPthey
lose3044VVPlose
them3045PPthem
at3046INat
the3047DTthe
end3048NNend
of3049INof
this3050DTthis
school3051NNschool
year3052NNyear
.3053SENT.
So3054RBso
even3055RBeven
I3056PPI
do3057VVPdo
n't3058RBn't
take3059VVtake
the3060DTthe
state3061NNstate
to3062TOto
be3063VBbe
challenging3064VVGchallenge
Article3065NPArticle
III3066NPIII
injury3067NNinjury
.3068SENT.
And3069CCand
so3070RBso
then3071RBthen
it3072PPit
's3073VBZbe
just3074RBjust
a3075DTa
question3076NNquestion
of3077INof
whether3078INwhether
they3079PPthey
're3080VBPbe
raising3081VVGraise
their3082PP$their
own3083JJown
rights3084NNSright
and3085CCand
they3086PPthey
are3087VBPbe
because3088INbecause
the3089DTthe
reason3090NNreason
they3091PPthey
're3092VBPbe
being3093VBGbe
excluded3094VVNexclude
from3095INfrom
the3096DTthe
program3097NNprogram
,3098,,
everybody3099NNeverybody
would3100MDwould
say3101VVsay
,3102,,
the3103DTthe
answer3104NNanswer
to3105TOto
the3106DTthe
question3107NNquestion
,3108,,
why3109WRBwhy
do3110VVPdo
n't3111RBn't
these3112DTthese
parents3113NNSparent
get3114VVPget
their3115PP$their
scholarships3116NNSscholarship
,3117,,
because3118INbecause
they3119PPthey
want3120VVPwant
to3121TOto
direct3122VVdirect
the3123DTthe
scholarships3124NNSscholarship
to3125TOto
religious3126JJreligious
schools3127NNSschool
.3128SENT.
Their3129PP$their
free3130JJfree
exercise3131NNexercise
is3132VBZbe
being3133VBGbe
penalized3134VVNpenalize
.3135SENT.
They3136PPthey
're3137VBPbe
not3138RBnot
raising3139VVGraise
a3140DTa
right3141NNright
on3142INon
behalf3143NNbehalf
of3144INof
the3145DTthe
state3146NNstate
.3147SENT.
Everybody3148NNEverybody
concedes3149VVZconcede
that3150IN/thatthat
if3151INif
all3152PDTall
the3153DTthe
parents3154NNSparent
in3155INin
this3156DTthis
program3157NNprogram
had3158VHDhave
wanted3159VVNwant
to3160TOto
choose3161VVchoose
secular3162JJsecular
schools3163NNSschool
,3164,,
there3165EXthere
'd3166MDwould
be3167VBbe
no3168DTno
basis3169NNbasis
for3170INfor
the3171DTthe
state3172NNstate
's3173POS's
court3174NNcourt
ruling3175NNruling
.3176SENT.
The3177DTthe
scholarship3178NNscholarship
program3179NNprogram
would3180MDwould
still3181RBstill
exist3182VVexist
.3183SENT.
It3184PPit
's3185VBZbe
only3186RBonly
because3187INbecause
some3188DTsome
parents3189NNSparent
said3190VVDsay
I3191PPI
want3192VVPwant
to3193TOto
send3194VVsend
my3195PP$my
kids3196NNSkid
to3197TOto
schools3198NNSschool
like3199INlike
Stillwater3200NPStillwater
,3201,,
and3202CCand
at3203INat
that3204DTthat
point3205NNpoint
,3206,,
at3207INat
page3208NNpage
303209CD@card@
of3210INof
the3211DTthe
Petition3212NNpetition
Appendix3213NNAppendix|appendix
,3214,,
the3215DTthe
state3216NNstate
supreme3217NNsupreme
court3218NNcourt
says3219VVZsay
we3220PPwe
have3221VHhave
a3222DTa
state3223NNstate
constitutional3224JJconstitutional
guarantee3225NNguarantee
,3226,,
no3227DTno
state3228NNstate
funds3229NNSfund
to3230TOto
religious3231JJreligious
schools3232NNSschool
.3233SENT.
That3234DTthat
's3235VBZbe
what3236WPwhat
it3237PPit
says3238VVZsay
.3239SENT.
And3240CCand
that3241DTthat
's3242VBZbe
a3243DTa
straightforward3244JJstraightforward
violation3245NNviolation
73246CD7
of3247INof
...3248:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3249LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Mr3250NPMr
.3251SENT.
Wall3252NPWall
...3253:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]3254LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
...3255:...
federal3256JJfederal
law3257NNlaw
.3258SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3259LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...3260:...
are3261VBPbe
you3262PPyou
claiming3263VVGclaim
that3264DTthat
...3265:...
what3266WPwhat
you3267PPyou
're3268VBPbe
calling3269VVGcall
Blaine3270NPBlaine
amendments3271NNSamendment
,3272,,
but3273CCbut
that3274IN/thatthat
the3275DTthe
Montana3276NPMontana
provision3277NNprovision
and3278CCand
all3279PDTall
the3280DTthe
other3281JJother
states3282NNSstate
that3283WDTthat
have3284VHPhave
one3285CDone
,3286,,
that3287WDTthat
as3288INas
a3289DTa
matter3290NNmatter
of3291INof
federal3292JJfederal
constitutional3293JJconstitutional
law3294NNlaw
,3295,,
all3296RBall
of3297INof
those3298DTthose
constitutional3299JJconstitutional
...3300:...
state3301NNstate
constitutional3302JJconstitutional
provisions3303NNSprovision
must3304MDmust
be3305VBbe
struck3306VVNstrike
?3307SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]3308LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Well3309UHWell
,3310,,
not3311RBnot
the3312DTthe
entire3313JJentire
category3314NNcategory
because3315INbecause
I3316PPI
actually3317RBactually
think3318VVPthink
it3319PPit
's3320VBZbe
a3321DTa
little3322RBlittle
more3323RBRmore
nuanced3324JJnuanced
than3325INthan
that3326DTthat
,3327,,
but3328CCbut
I3329PPI
am3330VBPbe
saying3331VVGsay
what3332WPwhat
the3333DTthe
Court3334NPCourt
said3335VVDsay
in3336INin
Trinity3337NPTrinity
Lutheran3338NPLutheran
.3339SENT.
Seven3340CDSeven
members3341NNSmember
of3342INof
the3343DTthe
Court3344NPCourt
said3345VVDsay
the3346DTthe
free-exercise3347NNfree-exercise
clause3348NNclause
there3349RBthere
compelled3350VVNcompel
what3351WPwhat
two3352CDtwo
members3353NNSmember
of3354INof
the3355DTthe
Court3356NPCourt
said3357VVDsay
in3358INin
your3359PP$your
dissent3360NNdissent
,3361,,
Justice3362NPJustice
Sotomayor3363NPSotomayor
,3364,,
the3365DTthe
Establishment3366NNestablishment
Clause3367NNclause
forbade3368VVDforbid
.3369SENT.
Yes3370UHyes
,3371,,
we3372PPwe
think3373VVPthink
the3374DTthe
same3375JJsame
is3376VBZbe
true3377JJtrue
here3378RBhere
.3379SENT.
There3380EXthere
are3381VBPbe
...3382:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3383LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That3384DTthat
's3385VBZbe
a3386DTa
radical3387JJradical
decision3388NNdecision
.3389SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]3390LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
I3391PPI
...3392:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3393LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
We3394PPwe
have3395VHPhave
...3396:...
we3397PPwe
have3398VHPhave
a3399DTa
founding3400JJfounding
father3401NNfather
,3402,,
Madison3403NPMadison
,3404,,
lobbying3405VVGlobby
heavily3406RBheavily
for3407INfor
the3408DTthe
free-exercise3409NNfree-exercise
clause3410NNclause
and3411CCand
equally3412RBequally
to3413TOto
stop3414VVstop
states3415NNSstate
from3416INfrom
both3417DTboth
establishing3418VVGestablish
religions3419NNSreligion
or3420CCor
using3421VVGuse
public3422JJpublic
funds3423NNSfund
to3424TOto
support3425VVsupport
them3426PPthem
.3427SENT.
There3428EXthere
's3429VHZhave
been3430VBNbe
over3431INover
...3432:...
since3433INsince
the3434DTthe
founding3435JJfounding
fathers3436NNSfather
,3437,,
a3438DTa
long3439JJlong
history3440NNhistory
of3441INof
people3442NNSpeople
who3443WPwho
for3444INfor
non-discriminatory3445JJnon-discriminatory
reasons3446NNSreason
,3447,,
but3448CCbut
for3449INfor
reasons3450NNSreason
related3451VVNrelate
to3452TOto
their3453PP$their
belief3454NNbelief
in3455INin
the3456DTthe
separation3457NNseparation
of3458INof
church3459NNchurch
and3460CCand
state3461NNstate
,3462,,
that3463WDTthat
have3464VHPhave
taken3465VVNtake
the3466DTthe
position3467NNposition
that3468IN/thatthat
the3469DTthe
state3470NNstate
should3471MDshould
not3472RBnot
give3473VVgive
money3474NNmoney
to3475TOto
religious3476JJreligious
institutions3477NNSinstitution
.3478SENT.
You3479PPyou
are3480VBPbe
suggesting3481VVGsuggest
now3482RBnow
that3483IN/thatthat
Montana3484NPMontana
in3485RBin
went3486VVDgo
through3487INthrough
an3488DTan
empty3489JJempty
exercise3490NNexercise
,3491,,
they3492PPthey
looked3493VVDlook
at3494INat
the3495DTthe
history3496NNhistory
of3497INof
this3498DTthis
amendment3499NNamendment
or3500CCor
one3501CDone
like3502INlike
it3503PPit
,3504,,
said3505VVDsay
it3506PPit
was3507VBDbe
odious3508JJodious
,3509,,
admitted3510VVDadmit
...3511:...
some3512DTsome
of3513INof
its3514PP$its
people3515NNSpeople
who3516WPwho
voted3517VVDvote
for3518INfor
this3519DTthis
bill3520NNbill
in3521INin
'3522'''
723523NP@card@
said3524VVDsay
it3525PPit
was3526VBDbe
a3527DTa
despicable3528JJdespicable
history3529NNhistory
,3530,,
but3531CCbut
they3532PPthey
then3533RBthen
looked3534VVDlook
at3535INat
the3536DTthe
founding3537JJfounding
fathers3538NNSfather
'3539POS'
writings3540NNSwriting
,3541,,
they3542PPthey
looked3543VVDlook
at3544INat
the3545DTthe
State3546NPState
of3547INof
Montana3548NPMontana
's3549POS's
religious3550JJreligious
tolerance3551NNtolerance
,3552,,
which3553WDTwhich
had3554VHDhave
changed3555VVNchange
dramatically3556RBdramatically
from3557INfrom
the3558DTthe
Blaine3559NPBlaine
Amendment3560NPAmendment
era3561NNera
,3562,,
and3563CCand
decided3564VVDdecide
that3565IN/thatthat
they3566PPthey
were3567VBDbe
going3568VVGgo
to3569TOto
side3570NNside
with3571INwith
James3572NPJames
Madison3573NPMadison
,3574,,
one3575CDone
of3576INof
the3577DTthe
fathers3578NNSfather
of3579INof
our3580PP$our
Constitution3581NPConstitution
,3582,,
and3583CCand
continue3584VVPcontinue
to3585TOto
say3586VVsay
we3587PPwe
do3588VVPdo
n't3589RBn't
want3590VVwant
aid3591NNaid
to3592TOto
churches3593NNSchurch
.3594SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]3595LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So3596RBso
...3597:...
so3598RBso
...3599:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3600LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Now3601RBnow
...3602:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3603LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Perhaps3604RBperhaps
you3605PPyou
could3606MDcould
comment3607VVcomment
,3608,,
counsel3609NNcounsel
.3610SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]3611LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So3612RBso
,3613,,
Justice3614NPJustice
Sotomayor3615NPSotomayor
,3616,,
that3617WDTthat
was3618VBDbe
one3619CDone
of3620INof
two3621CDtwo
points3622NNSpoint
I3623PPI
was3624VBDbe
hoping3625VVGhope
to3626TOto
make3627VVmake
on3628INon
the3629DTthe
merits3630NNSmerit
before3631INbefore
I3632PPI
sat3633VVDsit
down3634RPdown
.3635SENT.
Every3636DTevery
time3637NNtime
that3638IN/thatthat
the3639DTthe
state3640NNstate
points3641NNSpoint
to3642TOto
that3643DTthat
in3644INin
its3645PP$its
brief3646NNbrief
,3647,,
and3648CCand
I3649PPI
think3650VVPthink
most3651RBSmost
notably3652RBnotably
at3653INat
pages3654NNSpage
303655CD@card@
and3656CCand
313657CD@card@
,3658,,
and3659CCand
what3660WPwhat
Madison3661NPMadison
was3662VBDbe
talking3663VVGtalk
about3664RBabout
in3665INin
the3666DTthe
Remonstrance3667NNremonstrance
were3668VBDbe
compelled3669VVNcompel
support3670NNsupport
laws3671NNSlaw
,3672,,
preferential3673JJpreferential
aid3674NNaid
to3675TOto
the3676DTthe
church3677NNchurch
.3678SENT.
Even3679RBeven
the3680DTthe
state3681NNstate
admits3682VVZadmit
at3683INat
page3684NNpage
303685CD@card@
of3686INof
their3687PP$their
brief3688NNbrief
,3689,,
and3690CCand
these3691DTthese
are3692VBPbe
the3693DTthe
state3694NNstate
's3695POS's
words3696NNSword
:3697::
There3698EXthere
is3699VBZbe
zero3700CDzero
founding3701NNfounding
era3702NNera
evidence3703NNevidence
that3704IN/thatthat
there3705RBthere
...3706:...
that3707IN/thatthat
you3708PPyou
could3709MDcould
have3710VHhave
a3711DTa
generally3712RBgenerally
available3713JJavailable
benefit3714NNbenefit
and3715CCand
deny3716VVdeny
it3717PPit
to3718TOto
an3719DTan
institution3720NNinstitution
based3721VVNbase
on3722INon
its3723PP$its
religious3724JJreligious
character3725NNcharacter
...3726:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3727LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
What3728WPWhat
about3729RBabout
...3730:...
what3731WPwhat
about3732RBabout
...3733:...
MR3734NPMr
.3735SENT.
WALL3736NNwall
...3737:...
and3738CCand
Justice3739NPJustice
Thomas3740NPThomas
,3741,,
I3742PPI
think3743VVPthink
,3744,,
walks3745VVZwalk
through3746INthrough
the3747DTthe
history3748NNhistory
of3749INof
the3750DTthe
opposite3751NNopposite
in3752INin
his3753PP$his
Rosenberger3754NPRosenberger
concurrence3755NNconcurrence
,3756,,
that3757WDTthat
at3758INat
the3759DTthe
time3760NNtime
of3761INof
the3762DTthe
founding3763NNfounding
,3764,,
when3765WRBwhen
they3766PPthey
gave3767VVDgive
out3768RPout
land3769NNland
in3770INin
the3771DTthe
Northwest3772NPNorthwest
Territory3773NPTerritory
and3774CCand
other3775JJother
statutes3776NNSstatute
for3777INfor
...3778:...
to3779TOto
schools3780NNSschool
,3781,,
they3782PPthey
included3783VVDinclude
religiously3784RBreligiously
affiliated3785JJaffiliated
schools3786NNSschool
.3787SENT.
I3788PPI
think3789VVPthink
actually3790RBactually
the3791DTthe
tradition3792NNtradition
that3793WDTthat
dates3794VVZdate
to3795TOto
the3796DTthe
founding3797NNfounding
is3798VBZbe
...3799:...
is3800VBZbe
sort3801NNsort
of3802INof
the3803DTthe
opposite3804NNopposite
,3805,,
that3806WDTthat
you3807PPyou
can3808MDcan
't3809RB't
disqualify3810VVdisqualify
them3811PPthem
just3812RBjust
based3813VVNbase
on3814INon
their3815PP$their
religious3816JJreligious
character3817NNcharacter
,3818,,
but3819CCbut
you3820PPyou
can3821MDcan
have3822VHhave
no3823DTno
compelled3824VVNcompel
support3825NNsupport
,3826,,
no3827DTno
preferential3828JJpreferential
aid3829NNaid
to3830TOto
the3831DTthe
church3832NNchurch
.3833SENT.
And3834CCand
that3835DTthat
's3836VBZbe
very3837RBvery
different3838JJdifferent
from3839INfrom
what3840WPwhat
...3841:...
what3842WPwhat
's3843VBZbe
going3844VVGgo
on3845INon
here3846RBhere
.3847SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]3848LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But3849CCbut
what3850WPwhat
...3851:...
what3852WPwhat
did3853VVDdo
you3854PPyou
think3855VVPthink
of3856INof
this3857DTthis
?3858SENT?
I3859PPI
...3860:...
I3861PPI
'm3862VBPbe
having3863VHGhave
trouble3864NNtrouble
,3865,,
and3866CCand
I3867PPI
want3868VVPwant
you3869PPyou
to3870TOto
tell3871VVtell
me3872PPme
what3873WPwhat
you3874PPyou
really3875RBreally
think3876VVPthink
about3877INabout
this3878DTthis
problem3879NNproblem
which3880WDTwhich
has3881VHZhave
probably3882RBprobably
an3883DTan
answer3884NNanswer
that3885IN/thatthat
you3886PPyou
will3887MDwill
have3888VHhave
thought3889VVNthink
about3890RBabout
.3891SENT.
Okay3892JJokay
.3893SENT.
Say3894VVsay
in3895INin
San3896NPSan
Francisco3897NPFrancisco
or3898CCor
Boston3899NPBoston
or3900CCor
take3901VVtake
any3902DTany
city3903NNcity
or3904CCor
state3905NNstate
,3906,,
and3907CCand
they3908PPthey
give3909VVPgive
many3910JJmany
,3911,,
many3912JJmany
,3913,,
many3914JJmany
millions3915NNSmillion
of3916INof
dollars3917NNSdollar
to3918TOto
the3919DTthe
public3920JJpublic
school3921NNschool
system3922NNsystem
.3923SENT.
And3924CCand
a3925DTa
lot3926NNlot
of3927INof
them3928PPthem
give3929VVPgive
a3930DTa
lot3931NNlot
of3932INof
money3933NNmoney
to3934TOto
charter3935NNcharter
schools3936NNSschool
.3937SENT.
Now3938RBnow
,3939,,
they3940PPthey
do3941VVPdo
n't3942RBn't
give3943VVgive
money3944NNmoney
to3945TOto
Catholic3946JJCatholic
schools3947NNSschool
.3948SENT.
All3949DTall
right3950NNright
?3951SENT?
Now3952RBnow
,3953,,
if3954INif
...3955:...
if3956INif
we3957PPwe
decide3958VVPdecide
you3959PPyou
're3960VBPbe
right3961JJright
,3962,,
does3963VVZdo
that3964IN/thatthat
all3965DTall
change3966NNchange
?3967SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]3968LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Well3969UHWell
,3970,,
no3971UHno
,3972,,
in3973INin
certain3974JJcertain
respects3975NNSrespect
it3976PPit
does3977VVZdo
n't3978RBn't
change3979VVchange
,3980,,
Justice3981NPJustice
Breyer3982NPBreyer
.3983SENT.
They3984PPthey
do3985VVPdo
n't3986RBn't
...3987:...
if3988INif
they3989PPthey
want3990VVPwant
to3991TOto
open3992VVopen
up3993RPup
the3994DTthe
funding3995NNfunding
,3996,,
they3997PPthey
can3998MDcan
put3999VVput
limits4000NNSlimit
,4001,,
secular4002JJsecular
limits4003NNSlimit
,4004,,
on4005INon
the4006DTthe
program4007NNprogram
.4008SENT.
We4009PPwe
're4010VBPbe
going4011VVGgo
to4012TOto
give4013VVgive
math4014NNmath
scholarships4015NNSscholarship
or4016CCor
engineering4017NNengineering
scholarships4018NNSscholarship
...4019:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4020LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
There's4021NPThere's
...4022:...
I4023PPI
'm4024VBPbe
not4025RBnot
talking4026VVGtalk
about4027INabout
scholarships4028NNSscholarship
.4029SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]4030LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
But4031CCbut
if4032INif
...4033:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4034LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I4035PPI
'm4036VBPbe
talking4037VVGtalk
about4038INabout
the4039DTthe
X4040NPX
billion4041CDbillion
dollars4042NNSdollar
that4043IN/thatthat
the4044DTthe
State4045NNstate
of4046INof
New4047NPNew
York4048NPYork
spends4049VVZspend
on4050INon
the4051DTthe
public4052JJpublic
school4053NNschool
system4054NNsystem
,4055,,
and4056CCand
I4057PPI
do4058VVPdo
n't4059RBn't
know4060VVknow
how4061WRBhow
much4062JJmuch
,4063,,
but4064CCbut
I4065PPI
suspect4066VVPsuspect
they4067PPthey
might4068MDmight
spend4069VVspend
money4070NNmoney
on4071INon
charter4072NNcharter
schools4073NNSschool
.4074SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]4075LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Yes4076NPYes
.4077SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]4078LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Let4079NPLet
's4080POS's
call4081VVPcall
it4082PPit
another4083DTanother
million4084CDmillion
.4085SENT.
They4086PPthey
do4087VVPdo
not4088RBnot
...4089:...
I4090PPI
'm4091VBPbe
just4092RBjust
repeating4093VVGrepeat
myself4094PPmyself
...4095:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]4096LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Yes4097NPYes
.4098SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]4099LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...4100:...
spend4101VVspend
money4102NNmoney
on4103INon
the4104DTthe
Catholic4105JJCatholic
school4106NNschool
system4107NNsystem
.4108SENT.
Now4109RBnow
,4110,,
there4111EXthere
's4112VBZbe
nothing4113NNnothing
immoral4114JJimmoral
about4115INabout
that4116DTthat
.4117SENT.
That4118DTthat
's4119VBZbe
just4120RBjust
the4121DTthe
...4122:...
the4123DTthe
...4124:...
what4125WPwhat
they4126PPthey
do4127VVPdo
.4128SENT.
And4129CCand
...4130:...
and4131CCand
that4132WDTthat
's4133VBZbe
...4134:...
comes4135VVZcome
from4136INfrom
the4137DTthe
Constitution4138NPConstitution
.4139SENT.
All4140DTall
right4141NNright
.4142SENT.
If4143INif
I4144PPI
decide4145VVPdecide
...4146:...
it4147PPit
's4148VBZbe
the4149DTthe
same4150JJsame
question4151NNquestion
.4152SENT.
If4153INif
I4154PPI
decide4155VVPdecide
for4156INfor
you4157PPyou
,4158,,
am4159VBPbe
I4160PPI
saying4161VVGsay
that4162IN/thatthat
they4163PPthey
have4164VHPhave
to4165TOto
give4166VVgive
money4167NNmoney
to4168TOto
the4169DTthe
...4170:...
same4171JJsame
amounts4172NNSamount
proportionate4173VVPproportionate
to4174TOto
...4175:...
to4176TOto
the4177DTthe
parochial4178JJparochial
school4179NNschool
?4180SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]4181LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
I4182PPI
think4183VVPthink
if4184INif
they4185PPthey
structure4186VVPstructure
the4187DTthe
benefit4188NNbenefit
program4189NNprogram
the4190DTthe
way4191NNway
they4192PPthey
did4193VVDdo
here4194RBhere
or4195CCor
the4196DTthe
way4197NNway
they4198PPthey
did4199VVDdo
in4200INin
Trinity4201NPTrinity
Lutheran4202NPLutheran
...4203:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4204LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No4205NPNo
,4206,,
no4207RBno
.4208SENT.
I4209PPI
'm4210VBPbe
saying4211VVGsay
the4212DTthe
way4213NNway
...4214:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]4215LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
If4216INif
...4217:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4218LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...4219:...
they4220PPthey
do4221VVPdo
do4222VVdo
it4223PPit
,4224,,
not4225RBnot
the4226DTthe
way4227NNway
that4228IN/thatthat
they4229PPthey
did4230VVDdo
it4231PPit
here4232RBhere
and4233CCand
so4234RBso
forth4235RBforth
.4236SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]4237LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
If4238INif
they4239PPthey
are4240VBPbe
giving4241VVGgive
out4242RPout
generally4243RBgenerally
available4244JJavailable
public4245JJpublic
benefits4246NNSbenefit
for4247INfor
people4248NNSpeople
to4249TOto
go4250VVgo
to4251TOto
private4252JJprivate
schools4253NNSschool
...4254:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4255LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Oh4256UHoh
,4257,,
oh4258UHoh
,4259,,
what4260WPwhat
's4261VBZbe
the4262DTthe
private4263JJprivate
?4264SENT?
Why4265WRBwhy
is4266VBZbe
it4267PPit
that4268IN/thatthat
they4269PPthey
have4270VHPhave
to4271TOto
be4272VBbe
equal4273JJequal
with4274INwith
private4275JJprivate
but4276CCbut
they4277PPthey
do4278VVPdo
n't4279RBn't
have4280VHhave
to4281TOto
be4282VBbe
equal4283JJequal
with4284INwith
public4285NNpublic
?4286SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]4287LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
No4288NPNo
,4289,,
when4290WRBwhen
you4291PPyou
said4292VVDsay
charter4293NNcharter
schools4294NNSschool
,4295,,
I4296PPI
took4297VVDtake
those4298DTthose
to4299TOto
be4300VBbe
private4301JJprivate
schools4302NNSschool
.4303SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]4304LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Forget4305VVforget
the4306DTthe
charter4307NNcharter
schools4308NNSschool
.4309SENT.
Same4310JJsame
...4311:...
same4312JJsame
question4313NNquestion
.4314SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]4315LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
If4316INif
...4317:...
if4318INif
a4319DTa
city4320NNcity
or4321CCor
state4322NNstate
gives4323VVZgive
out4324RPout
funds4325NNSfund
for4326INfor
private4327JJprivate
education4328NNeducation
,4329,,
which4330WDTwhich
it4331PPit
's4332VBZbe
not4333RBnot
required4334VVNrequire
to4335TOto
do4336VVdo
,4337,,
it4338PPit
can4339MDcan
limit4340VVlimit
its4341PP$its
funding4342NNfunding
to4343TOto
public4344JJpublic
schools4345NNSschool
,4346,,
but4347CCbut
if4348INif
it4349PPit
gives4350VVZgive
it4351PPit
out4352RPout
and4353CCand
it4354PPit
gives4355VVZgive
it4356PPit
out4357RPout
just4358RBjust
for4359INfor
scholarships4360NNSscholarship
for4361INfor
private4362JJprivate
schools4363NNSschool
...4364:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4365LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
My4366PP$my
hypothetical4367JJhypothetical
was4368VBDbe
they4369PPthey
give4370VVPgive
it4371PPit
out4372RPout
in4373INin
...4374:...
it4375PPit
's4376VHZhave
called4377VVNcall
the4378DTthe
Public4379NPPublic
School4380NPSchool
System4381NPSystem
of4382INof
the4383DTthe
United4384NPUnited
States4385NPSStates
.4386SENT.
I4387PPI
'm4388VBPbe
saying4389VVGsay
that4390DTthat
's4391VBZbe
what4392WPwhat
I4393PPI
'm4394VBPbe
talking4395VVGtalk
about4396RBabout
.4397SENT.
Now4398RBnow
,4399,,
what4400WPwhat
's4401VHZhave
your4402PP$your
response4403NNresponse
?4404SENT?
What4405WPWhat
's4406VBZbe
the4407DTthe
difference4408NNdifference
between4409INbetween
this4410DTthis
case4411NNcase
,4412,,
you4413PPyou
win4414VVPwin
,4415,,
and4416CCand
the4417DTthe
same4418JJsame
with4419INwith
the4420DTthe
public4421JJpublic
schools4422NNSschool
,4423,,
they4424PPthey
have4425VHPhave
to4426TOto
give4427VVgive
it4428PPit
to4429TOto
parochial4430JJparochial
schools4431NNSschool
too4432RBtoo
.4433SENT.
What4434WPWhat
's4435VBZbe
the4436DTthe
difference4437NNdifference
?4438SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]4439LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Justice4440NPJustice
Breyer4441NPBreyer
,4442,,
what4443WPwhat
I4444PPI
'm4445VBPbe
saying4446VVGsay
in4447INin
the4448DTthe
last4449JJlast
paragraph4450NNparagraph
of4451INof
Trinity4452NPTrinity
Lutheran4453NPLutheran
,4454,,
when4455WRBwhen
the4456DTthe
Court4457NPCourt
said4458VVDsay
you4459PPyou
can4460MDcan
't4461RB't
deny4462VVdeny
a4463DTa
generally4464RBgenerally
available4465JJavailable
public4466JJpublic
benefit4467NNbenefit
to4468TOto
an4469DTan
entity4470NNentity
that4471WDTthat
's4472VBZbe
otherwise4473RBotherwise
qualified4474VVNqualify
based4475VVNbase
solely4476RBsolely
on4477INon
its4478PP$its
religious4479JJreligious
character4480NNcharacter
or4481CCor
nature4482NNnature
...4483:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4484LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So4485INso
Mr4486NPMr
.4487SENT.
Wall4488NPWall
,4489,,
do4490VVPdo
n't4491RBn't
you4492PPyou
...4493:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]4494LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
...4495:...
that4496DTthat
rule4497NNrule
applies4498VVZapply
equally4499RBequally
to4500TOto
schools4501NNSschool
as4502RBas
to4503TOto
playgrounds4504NNSplayground
.4505SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4506LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Mr4507NPMr
.4508SENT.
Wall4509NPWall
,4510,,
I4511PPI
mean4512VVPmean
,4513,,
there4514EXthere
seems4515VVZseem
...4516:...
I4517PPI
was4518VBDbe
one4519CDone
of4520INof
the4521DTthe
seven4522CDseven
in4523INin
Trinity4524NPTrinity
Lutheran4525NPLutheran
,4526,,
but4527CCbut
there4528EXthere
seems4529VVZseem
to4530TOto
me4531PPme
a4532DTa
real4533JJreal
difference4534NNdifference
in4535INin
this4536DTthis
case4537NNcase
.4538SENT.
In4539INin
Trinity4540NPTrinity
Lutheran4541NPLutheran
,4542,,
the4543DTthe
...4544:...
a4545DTa
state4546NNstate
was4547VBDbe
using4548VVGuse
the4549DTthe
religious4550JJreligious
status4551NNstatus
of4552INof
various4553JJvarious
people4554NNSpeople
or4555CCor
entities4556NNSentity
to4557TOto
limit4558VVlimit
access4559NNaccess
to4560TOto
a4561DTa
unrelated4562JJunrelated
public4563JJpublic
benefit4564NNbenefit
,4565,,
to4566TOto
a4567DTa
completely4568RBcompletely
secular4569JJsecular
public4570JJpublic
benefit4571NNbenefit
.4572SENT.
Now4573RBnow
,4574,,
here4575RBhere
,4576,,
it4577PPit
seems4578VVZseem
to4579TOto
me4580PPme
,4581,,
that4582IN/thatthat
what4583WPwhat
the4584DTthe
state4585NNstate
is4586VBZbe
doing4587VVGdo
with4588INwith
respect4589NNrespect
to4590TOto
these4591DTthese
educational4592JJeducational
programs4593NNSprogram
is4594VBZbe
to4595TOto
say4596VVsay
:4597::
We4598PPwe
do4599VVPdo
n't4600RBn't
want4601VVwant
to4602TOto
subsidize4603VVsubsidize
religious4604JJreligious
activity4605NNactivity
.4606SENT.
We4607PPwe
do4608VVPdo
n't4609RBn't
want4610VVwant
to4611TOto
subsidize4612VVsubsidize
religious4613JJreligious
education4614NNeducation
.4615SENT.
And4616CCand
,4617,,
further4618RBRfurther
,4619,,
because4620INbecause
of4621INof
the4622DTthe
way4623NNway
that4624IN/thatthat
the4625DTthe
supreme4626JJsupreme
court4627NNcourt
issued4628VVDissue
its4629PP$its
decision4630NNdecision
,4631,,
that4632WDTthat
will4633MDwill
mean4634VVmean
that4635IN/thatthat
we4636PPwe
do4637VVPdo
n't4638RBn't
want4639VVwant
to4640TOto
subsidize4641VVsubsidize
any4642DTany
private4643JJprivate
education4644NNeducation
.4645SENT.
So4646RBso
you4647PPyou
have4648VHPhave
both4649PDTboth
the4650DTthe
non-discrimination4651NNnon-discrimination
as4652RBas
to4653TOto
that4654DTthat
,4655,,
but4656CCbut
even4657RBeven
put4658VVDput
that4659IN/thatthat
aside4660RBaside
,4661,,
what4662WPwhat
this4663DTthis
is4664VBZbe
is4665VBZbe
essentially4666RBessentially
a4667DTa
state4668NNstate
saying4669VVGsay
,4670,,
for4671INfor
many4672JJmany
reasons4673NNSreason
that4674WDTthat
have4675VHPhave
been4676VBNbe
viewed4677VVNview
as4678INas
legitimate4679JJlegitimate
,4680,,
even4681RBeven
though4682INthough
not4683RBnot
shared4684VVNshare
by4685INby
everybody4686NNeverybody
,4687,,
but4688CCbut
have4689VHPhave
been4690VBNbe
viewed4691VVNview
as4692RBas
legitimate4693JJlegitimate
for4694INfor
many4695JJmany
years4696NNSyear
,4697,,
we4698PPwe
do4699VVPdo
n't4700RBn't
want4701VVwant
to4702TOto
subsidize4703VVsubsidize
religious4704JJreligious
activity4705NNactivity
,4706,,
in4707INin
particular4708JJparticular
religious4709JJreligious
education4710NNeducation
.4711SENT.
That4712DTthat
's4713VBZbe
a4714DTa
far4715JJfar
cry4716NNcry
from4717INfrom
Trinity4718NPTrinity
Lutheran4719NPLutheran
.4720SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]4721LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So4722INso
your4723PP$your
question4724NNquestion
gets4725VVZget
at4726INat
the4727DTthe
two4728CDtwo
things4729NNSthing
I4730PPI
was4731VBDbe
hoping4732VVGhope
to4733TOto
say4734VVsay
before4735INbefore
I4736PPI
sat4737VVDsit
down4738RPdown
.4739SENT.
24740CD2
The4741DTthe
...4742:...
the4743DTthe
first4744JJfirst
is4745VBZbe
all4746DTall
we4747PPwe
're4748VBPbe
asking4749VVGask
and4750CCand
the4751DTthe
Petitioners4752NNSpetitioner
are4753VBPbe
asking4754VVGask
is4755VBZbe
that4756IN/thatthat
you4757PPyou
do4758VVPdo
what4759WPwhat
you4760PPyou
normally4761RBnormally
do4762VVPdo
when4763WRBwhen
you4764PPyou
review4765VVPreview
a4766DTa
state4767NNstate
supreme4768JJsupreme
court4769NNcourt
decision4770NNdecision
.4771SENT.
At4772INat
page4773NNpage
324774CD@card@
of4775INof
the4776DTthe
Pet4777NPPet
.4778SENT.
App4779NPApp
.4780SENT.
,4781,,
it4782PPit
said4783VVDsay
no4784DTno
problem4785NNproblem
with4786INwith
federal4787JJfederal
law4788NNlaw
.4789SENT.
It4790PPit
got4791VVDget
federal4792JJfederal
law4793NNlaw
wrong4794JJwrong
.4795SENT.
If4796INif
it4797PPit
had4798VHDhave
come4799VVNcome
out4800RPout
correctly4801RBcorrectly
on4802INon
the4803DTthe
federal4804JJfederal
law4805NNlaw
question4806NNquestion
,4807,,
nothing4808NNnothing
else4809RBelse
in4810INin
the4811DTthe
decision4812NNdecision
would4813MDwould
have4814VHhave
flowed4815VVNflow
.4816SENT.
The4817DTthe
trial4818NNtrial
court4819NNcourt
would4820MDwould
have4821VHhave
been4822VBNbe
affirmed4823VVNaffirm
and4824CCand
everybody4825NNeverybody
would4826MDwould
have4827VHhave
gotten4828VVNget
the4829DTthe
scholarships4830NNSscholarship
.4831SENT.
That4832DTthat
...4833:...
with4834INwith
the4835DTthe
application4836NNapplication
of4837INof
the4838DTthe
state4839NNstate
constitutional4840JJconstitutional
provision4841NNprovision
,4842,,
which4843WDTwhich
was4844VBDbe
preempted4845VVNpreempt
under4846INunder
Trinity4847NPTrinity
Lutheran4848NPLutheran
,4849,,
was4850VBDbe
the4851DTthe
only4852JJonly
basis4853NNbasis
to4854TOto
impugn4855VVimpugn
the4856DTthe
state4857NNstate
law4858NNlaw
.4859SENT.
So4860RBso
you4861PPyou
should4862MDshould
reverse4863VVreverse
the4864DTthe
federal4865JJfederal
error4866NNerror
and4867CCand
send4868VVsend
it4869PPit
back4870RBback
.4871SENT.
On4872INon
the4873DTthe
merits4874NNSmerit
of4875INof
your4876PP$your
question4877NNquestion
,4878,,
look4879VVlook
,4880,,
I4881PPI
get4882VVPget
that4883IN/thatthat
you4884PPyou
can4885MDcan
say4886VVsay
it4887PPit
's4888VBZbe
a4889DTa
harder4890JJRhard
case4891NNcase
because4892INbecause
it4893PPit
's4894VBZbe
...4895:...
it4896PPit
's4897POS's
education4898NNeducation
and4899CCand
it4900PPit
's4901VBZbe
not4902RBnot
a4903DTa
playground4904NNplayground
.4905SENT.
And4906CCand
in4907INin
that4908DTthat
sense4909NNsense
,4910,,
it4911PPit
may4912MDmay
be4913VBbe
a4914DTa
harder4915JJRhard
question4916NNquestion
,4917,,
but4918CCbut
the4919DTthe
Montana4920NPMontana
Supreme4921NPSupreme
Court4922NPCourt
did4923VVDdo
n't4924RBn't
take4925VVtake
it4926PPit
as4927INas
a4928DTa
case4929NNcase
about4930INabout
use4931NNuse
,4932,,
did4933VVDdo
n't4934RBn't
try4935VVtry
to4936TOto
say4937VVsay
this4938DTthis
was4939VBDbe
covered4940VVNcover
by4941INby
Davey4942NPDavey
or4943CCor
any4944DTany
of4945INof
the4946DTthe
rest4947NNrest
.4948SENT.
It4949PPit
said4950VVDsay
religiously-affiliated4951JJreligiously-affiliated
schools4952NNSschool
.4953SENT.
That4954DTthat
's4955VBZbe
a4956DTa
status-based4957JJstatus-based
distinction4958NNdistinction
.4959SENT.
And4960CCand
I4961PPI
do4962VVPdo
n't4963RBn't
think4964VVthink
we4965PPwe
can4966MDcan
distinguish4967VVdistinguish
that4968IN/thatthat
from4969INfrom
Trinity4970NPTrinity
Lutheran4971NPLutheran
.4972SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4973LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank4974VVthank
you4975PPyou
,4976,,
counsel4977NNcounsel
.4978SENT.
Mr4979NPMr
.4980SENT.
Unikowsky4981NPUnikowsky
.4982SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]4983LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Mr4984NPMr
.4985SENT.
Chief4986NPChief
Justice4987NPJustice
,4988,,
and4989CCand
may4990MDmay
it4991PPit
please4992VVplease
the4993DTthe
Court4994NPCourt
:4995::
The4996DTthe
Constitution4997NPConstitution
does4998VVZdo
not4999RBnot
bar5000VVbar
the5001DTthe
State5002NNstate
of5003INof
Montana5004NPMontana
from5005INfrom
enacting5006VVGenact
and5007CCand
applying5008VVGapply
a5009DTa
state5010NNstate
constitutional5011JJconstitutional
provision5012NNprovision
that5013WDTthat
keeps5014VVZkeep
its5015PP$its
own5016JJown
state5017NNstate
legislature5018NNlegislature
out5019INout
of5020INof
the5021DTthe
business5022NNbusiness
of5023INof
funding5024NNfunding
of5025INof
religious5026JJreligious
schools5027NNSschool
.5028SENT.
The5029DTthe
no-aid5030NNno-aid
clause5031NNclause
does5032VVZdo
not5033RBnot
prohibit5034VVprohibit
anyone5035NNanyone
's5036POS's
free5037JJfree
exercise5038NNexercise
of5039INof
religion5040NNreligion
.5041SENT.
To5042TOTo
the5043DTthe
contrary5044NNcontrary
,5045,,
it5046PPit
protects5047VVZprotect
religious5048JJreligious
freedom5049NNfreedom
by5050INby
protecting5051VVGprotect
religious5052JJreligious
schools5053NNSschool
from5054INfrom
government5055NNgovernment
influence5056NNinfluence
and5057CCand
ensuring5058VVGensure
that5059DTthat
government5060NNgovernment
cannot5061MDcan
use5062VVuse
aid5063NNaid
as5064INas
leverage5065NNleverage
to5066TOto
influence5067VVinfluence
the5068DTthe
content5069NNcontent
of5070INof
religious5071JJreligious
education5072NNeducation
.5073SENT.
Petitioners5074NNSpetitioner
attempt5075VVPattempt
to5076TOto
analogize5077VVanalogize
this5078DTthis
case5079NNcase
to5080TOto
Trinity5081NPTrinity
Lutheran5082NPLutheran
but5083CCbut
the5084DTthe
analogy5085NNanalogy
is5086VBZbe
inapt5087JJinapt
for5088INfor
two5089CDtwo
reasons5090NNSreason
:5091::
The5092DTthe
first5093JJfirst
reason5094NNreason
is5095VBZbe
that5096IN/thatthat
the5097DTthe
coercion5098NNcoercion
aspect5099NNaspect
of5100INof
Trinity5101NPTrinity
Lutheran5102NPLutheran
,5103,,
which5104WDTwhich
was5105VBDbe
crucial5106JJcrucial
to5107TOto
the5108DTthe
Court5109NPCourt
's5110POS's
decision5111NNdecision
,5112,,
was5113VBDbe
absent5114JJabsent
here5115RBhere
.5116SENT.
In5117INin
Trinity5118NPTrinity
Lutheran5119NPLutheran
,5120,,
the5121DTthe
church5122NNchurch
put5123VVDput
to5124TOto
a5125DTa
stark5126JJstark
choice5127NNchoice
:5128::
Either5129CCeither
abandon5130VVabandon
your5131PP$your
religious5132JJreligious
faith5133NNfaith
and5134CCand
become5135VVbecome
a5136DTa
nice5137JJnice
secular5138JJsecular
stone5139NNstone
building5140NNbuilding
with5141INwith
a5142DTa
daycare5143NNdaycare
facility5144NNfacility
and5145CCand
you5146PPyou
're5147VBPbe
going5148VVGgo
to5149TOto
get5150VVget
the5151DTthe
money5152NNmoney
or5153CCor
stick5154VVstick
to5155TOto
your5156PP$your
religious5157JJreligious
faith5158NNfaith
and5159CCand
you5160PPyou
won5161MDwill
't5162RB't
get5163VVget
...5164:...
you5165PPyou
won5166MDwill
't5167RB't
get5168VVget
the5169DTthe
money5170NNmoney
.5171SENT.
And5172CCand
that5173DTthat
coercion5174NNcoercion
was5175VBDbe
the5176DTthe
premise5177NNpremise
of5178INof
the5179DTthe
Court5180NPCourt
's5181POS's
decision5182NNdecision
that5183IN/thatthat
there5184EXthere
is5185VBZbe
a5186DTa
penalty5187NNpenalty
on5188INon
free5189JJfree
exercise5190NNexercise
.5191SENT.
That5192DTthat
's5193VBZbe
not5194RBnot
happening5195VVGhappen
in5196INin
this5197DTthis
case5198NNcase
where5199WRBwhere
the5200DTthe
state5201NNstate
court5202NNcourt
held5203VVDhold
that5204IN/thatthat
Montana5205NPMontana
was5206VBDbe
n't5207RBn't
even5208RBeven
capable5209JJcapable
of5210INof
knowing5211VVGknow
whether5212INwhether
a5213DTa
particular5214JJparticular
parent5215NNparent
would5216MDwould
use5217VVuse
money5218NNmoney
for5219INfor
a5220DTa
religious5221JJreligious
and5222CCand
non-religious5223JJnon-religious
school5224NNschool
,5225,,
and5226CCand
it5227PPit
therefore5228RBtherefore
held5229VVDhold
that5230IN/thatthat
regardless5231RBregardless
of5232INof
how5233WRBhow
the5234DTthe
money5235NNmoney
was5236VBDbe
spent5237VVNspend
,5238,,
there5239EXthere
would5240MDwould
n't5241RBn't
be5242VBbe
a5243DTa
tax5244NNtax
credit5245NNcredit
.5246SENT.
The5247DTthe
second5248JJsecond
distinction5249NNdistinction
from5250INfrom
Trinity5251NPTrinity
Lutheran5252NPLutheran
is5253VBZbe
that5254IN/thatthat
Trinity5255NPTrinity
Lutheran5256NPLutheran
involved5257VVDinvolve
the5258DTthe
refusal5259NNrefusal
to5260TOto
give5261VVgive
money5262NNmoney
to5263TOto
a5264DTa
church5265NNchurch
for5266INfor
a5267DTa
completely5268RBcompletely
non-religious5269JJnon-religious
purpose5270NNpurpose
,5271,,
merely5272RBmerely
because5273INbecause
it5274PPit
was5275VBDbe
a5276DTa
church5277NNchurch
.5278SENT.
This5279DTthis
case5280NNcase
is5281VBZbe
different5282JJdifferent
in5283INin
that5284IN/thatthat
the5285DTthe
state5286NNstate
is5287VBZbe
simply5288RBsimply
declining5289VVGdecline
to5290TOto
fund5291VVfund
religious5292JJreligious
education5293NNeducation
.5294SENT.
The5295DTthe
state5296NNstate
court5297NNcourt
did5298VVDdo
not5299RBnot
hold5300VVhold
that5301IN/thatthat
under5302INunder
the5303DTthe
no-aid5304NNno-aid
clause5305NNclause
,5306,,
religious5307JJreligious
schools5308NNSschool
would5309MDwould
be5310VBbe
denied5311VVNdeny
funding5312NNfunding
for5313INfor
non-religious5314JJnon-religious
purposes5315NNSpurpose
.5316SENT.
So5317RBso
let5318VVlet
me5319PPme
start5320VVstart
with5321INwith
the5322DTthe
standing5323NNstanding
point5324NNpoint
which5325WDTwhich
came5326VVDcome
up5327RPup
during5328INduring
the5329DTthe
first5330JJfirst
half5331NNhalf
hour5332NNhour
.5333SENT.
So5334RBso
we5335PPwe
did5336VVDdo
n't5337RBn't
,5338,,
as5339INas
the5340DTthe
Court5341NPCourt
knows5342VVZknow
,5343,,
it5344PPit
's5345VBZbe
in5346INin
an5347DTan
amicus5348NNamicus
brief5349NNbrief
,5350,,
but5351CCbut
we5352PPwe
did5353VVDdo
n't5354RBn't
make5355VVmake
the5356DTthe
argument5357NNargument
in5358INin
our5359PP$our
brief5360NNbrief
because5361INbecause
we5362PPwe
concluded5363VVDconclude
that5364IN/thatthat
the5365DTthe
arguments5366NNSargument
really5367RBreally
went5368VVDgo
more5369RBRmore
to5370TOto
the5371DTthe
merits5372NNSmerit
rather5373RBrather
than5374INthan
standing5375NNstanding
.5376SENT.
We5377PPwe
...5378:...
I5379PPI
...5380:...
I5381PPI
mean5382VVPmean
,5383,,
we5384PPwe
believe5385VVPbelieve
there5386EXthere
's5387VBZbe
an5388DTan
attenuated5389JJattenuated
connection5390NNconnection
between5391INbetween
the5392DTthe
state5393NNstate
action5394NNaction
here5395RBhere
and5396CCand
Petitioners5397NNSpetitioner
'5398POS'
free5399JJfree
exercise5400NNexercise
of5401INof
religion5402NNreligion
but5403CCbut
Petitioners5404NNSpetitioner
are5405VBPbe
alleging5406VVGallege
in5407INin
their5408PP$their
brief5409NNbrief
that5410IN/thatthat
they5411PPthey
personally5412RBpersonally
are5413VBPbe
the5414DTthe
victims5415NNSvictim
of5416INof
status5417NNstatus
discrimination5418NNdiscrimination
because5419INbecause
they5420PPthey
are5421VBPbe
Christians5422NNSChristian
.5423SENT.
We5424PPwe
think5425VVPthink
that5426WDTthat
's5427VBZbe
wrong5428RBwrong
based5429VVNbase
on5430INon
what5431WPwhat
the5432DTthe
state5433NNstate
court5434NNcourt
actually5435RBactually
did5436VVDdo
,5437,,
but5438CCbut
historically5439RBhistorically
the5440DTthe
courthouse5441NNcourthouse
doors5442NNSdoor
have5443VHPhave
been5444VBNbe
open5445JJopen
to5446TOto
make5447VVmake
that5448DTthat
kind5449NNkind
of5450INof
argument5451NNargument
.5452SENT.
But5453CCbut
we5454PPwe
think5455VVPthink
on5456INon
the5457DTthe
merits5458NNSmerit
,5459,,
there5460EXthere
simply5461RBsimply
is5462VBZbe
n't5463RBn't
a5464DTa
prohibition5465NNprohibition
on5466INon
the5467DTthe
free5468JJfree
exercise5469NNexercise
.5470SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5471LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I5472PPI
...5473:...
I5474PPI
'd5475MDwould
like5476VVlike
to5477TOto
get5478VVget
back5479RBback
to5480TOto
Justice5481NPJustice
Breyer5482NPBreyer
's5483POS's
question5484NNquestion
and5485CCand
get5486VVget
your5487PP$your
view5488NNview
you5489PPyou
on5490INon
it5491PPit
which5492WDTwhich
I5493PPI
understand5494VVPunderstand
it5495PPit
to5496TOto
be5497VBbe
that5498IN/thatthat
why5499WRBwhy
does5500VVZdo
n't5501RBn't
...5502:...
do5503VVPdo
you5504PPyou
think5505VVPthink
the5506DTthe
other5507JJother
side5508NNside
's5509POS's
theory5510NNtheory
leads5511VVZlead
to5512TOto
a5513DTa
situation5514NNsituation
where5515WRBwhere
the5516DTthe
funding5517NNfunding
that5518WDTthat
goes5519VVZgo
to5520TOto
public5521JJpublic
schools5522NNSschool
,5523,,
a5524DTa
...5525:...
a5526DTa
...5527:...
if5528INif
...5529:...
if5530INif
they5531PPthey
prevail5532VVPprevail
,5533,,
would5534MDwould
n't5535RBn't
have5536VHhave
to5537TOto
go5538VVgo
to5539TOto
religious5540JJreligious
schools5541NNSschool
?5542SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]5543LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Well5544UHwell
,5545,,
I5546PPI
mean5547VVPmean
,5548,,
I5549PPI
'm5550VBPbe
not5551RBnot
sure5552JJsure
of5553INof
the5554DTthe
breadth5555NNbreadth
of5556INof
their5557PP$their
theory5558NNtheory
.5559SENT.
I5560PPI
mean5561VVPmean
,5562,,
there5563EXthere
's5564VBZbe
a5565DTa
number5566NNnumber
of5567INof
amicus5568NNamicus
briefs5569NNSbrief
that5570RBthat
...5571:...
that5572WDTthat
make5573VVPmake
that5574DTthat
exact5575JJexact
point5576NNpoint
.5577SENT.
I5578PPI
mean5579VVPmean
...5580:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5581LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well5582UHwell
,5583,,
let5584VVlet
's5585VBZbe
take5586VVtake
it5587PPit
to5588TOto
be5589VBbe
just5590RBjust
that5591RBthat
,5592,,
I5593PPI
mean5594VVPmean
,5595,,
this5596DTthis
is5597VBZbe
a5598DTa
case5599NNcase
about5600INabout
money5601NNmoney
and5602CCand
the5603DTthe
question5604NNquestion
whether5605INwhether
or5606CCor
not5607RBnot
it5608PPit
must5609MDmust
go5610VVgo
to5611TOto
religious5612JJreligious
schools5613NNSschool
.5614SENT.
And5615CCand
I5616PPI
am5617VBPbe
wondering5618VVGwonder
if5619INif
the5620DTthe
public5621NNpublic
...5622:...
the5623DTthe
funding5624NNfunding
of5625INof
public5626JJpublic
schools5627NNSschool
is5628VBZbe
the5629DTthe
same5630JJsame
as5631INas
the5632DTthe
situation5633NNsituation
involved5634VVNinvolve
here5635RBhere
in5636INin
your5637PP$your
...5638:...
in5639INin
your5640PP$your
view5641NNview
?5642SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]5643LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I5644PPI
guess5645VVPguess
I5646PPI
do5647VVPdo
n't5648RBn't
understand5649VVunderstand
Petitioners5650NNSpetitioner
to5651TOto
be5652VBbe
making5653VVGmake
that5654DTthat
argument5655NNargument
in5656INin
this5657DTthis
particular5658JJparticular
case5659NNcase
.5660SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]5661LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
They5662PPthey
're5663VBPbe
not5664RBnot
,5665,,
but5666CCbut
that5667DTthat
's5668VBZbe
what's5669NNwhat's
...5670:...
but5671CCbut
it5672PPit
still5673RBstill
can5674MDcan
bother5675VVbother
me5676PPme
.5677SENT.
I5678PPI
'd5679MDwould
like5680VVlike
to5681TOto
know5682VVknow
if5683INif
in5684INin
deciding5685VVGdecide
it5686PPit
for5687INfor
them5688PPthem
,5689,,
if5690INif
I5691PPI
do5692VVPdo
,5693,,
that5694IN/thatthat
I5695PPI
have5696VHPhave
made5697VVNmake
a5698DTa
major5699JJmajor
change5700NNchange
in5701INin
the5702DTthe
public5703JJpublic
school5704NNschool
system5705NNsystem
.5706SENT.
I5707PPI
understand5708VVPunderstand
one5709PPone
's5710VBZbe
private5711JJprivate
and5712CCand
the5713DTthe
other5714JJother
's5715POS's
public5716NNpublic
.5717SENT.
And5718CCand
what5719WPwhat
I5720PPI
'm5721VBPbe
asking5722VVGask
for5723INfor
,5724,,
you5725PPyou
or5726CCor
them5727PPthem
,5728,,
why5729WRBwhy
would5730MDwould
that5731DTthat
matter5732NNmatter
?5733SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]5734LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Well5735UHWell
...5736:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]5737LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
That5738DTthat
is5739VBZbe
,5740,,
why5741WRBwhy
...5742:...
why5743WRBwhy
would5744MDwould
it5745PPit
make5746VVmake
a5747DTa
difference5748NNdifference
,5749,,
if5750INif
you5751PPyou
have5752VHPhave
to5753TOto
give5754VVgive
...5755:...
I5756PPI
mean5757VVPmean
,5758,,
now5759RBnow
do5760VVPdo
n't5761RBn't
jump5762VVjump
on5763INon
to5764TOto
my5765PP$my
argument5766NNargument
and5767CCand
say5768VVPsay
,5769,,
great5770JJgreat
,5771,,
it5772PPit
supports5773VVZsupport
you5774PPyou
.5775SENT.
I5776PPI
'm5777VBPbe
not5778RBnot
making5779VVGmake
an5780DTan
argument5781NNargument
to5782TOto
support5783VVsupport
you5784PPyou
.5785SENT.
[5786SYM[
LAUGHTER5787NNlaughter
]5788SYM]
[JUSTICE BREYER]5789LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I5790PPI
'm5791VBPbe
asking5792VVGask
a5793DTa
question5794NNquestion
to5795TOto
find5796VVfind
out5797RPout
the5798DTthe
answer5799NNanswer
.5800SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]5801LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Well5802UHWell
,5803,,
I5804PPI
...5805:...
I5806PPI
...5807:...
I5808PPI
'm5809VBPbe
not5810RBnot
sure5811JJsure
exactly5812RBexactly
how5813WRBhow
far5814RBfar
Petitioners5815NNSpetitioner
'5816POS'
argument5817NNargument
would5818MDwould
lead5819VVlead
,5820,,
but5821CCbut
I5822PPI
...5823:...
I5824PPI
do5825VVPdo
think5826VVthink
that5827IN/thatthat
one5828CDone
important5829JJimportant
point5830NNpoint
of5831INof
this5832DTthis
...5833:...
in5834INin
this5835DTthis
case5836NNcase
is5837VBZbe
that5838IN/thatthat
states5839NNSstate
generally5840RBgenerally
have5841VHPhave
had5842VHNhave
power5843NNpower
over5844INover
education5845NNeducation
,5846,,
and5847CCand
to5848TOto
decide5849VVdecide
that5850IN/thatthat
they5851PPthey
're5852VBPbe
only5853RBonly
going5854VVGgo
to5855TOto
fund5856VVfund
the5857DTthe
public5858JJpublic
school5859NNschool
system5860NNsystem
,5861,,
and5862CCand
that5863DTthat
is5864VBZbe
the5865DTthe
ultimate5866JJultimate
effect5867NNeffect
of5868INof
the5869DTthe
state5870NNstate
court5871NNcourt
's5872POS's
judgment5873NNjudgment
in5874INin
this5875DTthis
case5876NNcase
.5877SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5878LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
But5879CCbut
,5880,,
I5881PPI
wonder5882VVPwonder
if5883INif
...5884:...
if5885INif
there5886EXthere
's5887VBZbe
a5888DTa
difference5889NNdifference
in5890INin
the5891DTthe
sense5892NNsense
that5893WDTthat
...5894:...
that5895DTthat
...5896:...
between5897INbetween
general5898JJgeneral
funding5899NNfunding
of5900INof
the5901DTthe
public5902JJpublic
schools5903NNSschool
and5904CCand
the5905DTthe
decision5906NNdecision
to5907TOto
provide5908VVprovide
aid5909NNaid
to5910TOto
private5911JJprivate
schools5912NNSschool
,5913,,
except5914INexcept
not5915RBnot
religious5916JJreligious
schools5917NNSschool
.5918SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]5919LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Well5920UHWell
,5921,,
so5922RBso
I5923PPI
think5924VVPthink
that5925IN/thatthat
,5926,,
you5927PPyou
know5928VVPknow
,5929,,
the5930DTthe
question5931NNquestion
in5932INin
this5933DTthis
case5934NNcase
ultimately5935RBultimately
boils5936VVZboil
down5937RPdown
to5938TOto
,5939,,
whether5940INwhether
the5941DTthe
striking5942VVGstrike
down5943RPdown
of5944INof
the5945DTthe
program5946NNprogram
because5947INbecause
of5948INof
the5949DTthe
no-aid5950NNno-aid
clause5951NNclause
just5952RBjust
in5953INin
and5954CCand
of5955INof
itself5956PPitself
is5957VBZbe
a5958DTa
violation5959NNviolation
of5960INof
the5961DTthe
free5962JJfree
exercise5963NNexercise
right5964NNright
of5965INof
Petitioners5966NNSpetitioner
.5967SENT.
And5968CCand
,5969,,
you5970PPyou
know5971VVPknow
,5972,,
the5973DTthe
first5974JJfirst
half5975NNhalf
of5976INof
the5977DTthe
argument5978NNargument
involved5979VVDinvolve
a5980DTa
number5981NNnumber
of5982INof
questions5983NNSquestion
about5984INabout
how5985WRBhow
Petitioners5986NNSpetitioner
are5987VBPbe
really5988RBreally
harmed5989VVNharm
if5990INif
the5991DTthe
program5992NNprogram
as5993INas
a5994DTa
whole5995NNwhole
is5996VBZbe
struck5997VVNstrike
down5998RPdown
.5999SENT.
And6000CCand
I6001PPI
think6002VVPthink
I6003PPI
heard6004VVDhear
two6005CDtwo
sets6006NNSset
of6007INof
arguments6008NNSargument
from6009INfrom
the6010DTthe
other6011JJother
side6012NNside
,6013,,
from6014INfrom
Petitioners6015NNSpetitioner
,6016,,
both6017CCboth
of6018INof
which6019WDTwhich
I6020PPI
would6021MDwould
like6022VVlike
to6023TOto
address6024VVaddress
.6025SENT.
One6026CDOne
argument6027NNargument
is6028VBZbe
the6029DTthe
sort6030NNsort
of6031INof
broader6032JJRbroad
argument6033NNargument
that6034IN/thatthat
just6035RBjust
,6036,,
the6037DTthe
no-aid6038NNno-aid
clause6039NNclause
is6040VBZbe
just6041RBjust
constitutionally6042RBconstitutionally
defective6043JJdefective
,6044,,
like6045VVlike
,6046,,
by6047INby
its6048PP$its
very6049JJvery
nature6050NNnature
,6051,,
because6052INbecause
it6053PPit
is6054VBZbe
discriminatory6055JJdiscriminatory
,6056,,
is6057VBZbe
not6058RBnot
capable6059JJcapable
of6060INof
being6061VBGbe
applied6062VVNapply
,6063,,
and6064CCand
,6065,,
therefore6066RBtherefore
,6067,,
the6068DTthe
court6069NNcourt
should6070MDshould
just6071RBjust
remand6072VVremand
and6073CCand
tell6074VVtell
the6075DTthe
court6076NNcourt
you6077PPyou
just6078RBjust
can6079MDcan
't6080RB't
apply6081VVapply
this6082DTthis
illegal6083JJillegal
rule6084NNrule
.6085SENT.
And6086CCand
the6087DTthe
second6088JJsecond
argument6089NNargument
I6090PPI
heard6091VVNhear
is6092VBZbe
this6093DTthis
somewhat6094RBsomewhat
narrower6095JJRnarrow
argument6096NNargument
that6097IN/thatthat
as6098RBas
applied6099VVNapply
,6100,,
the6101DTthe
problem6102NNproblem
here6103RBhere
is6104VBZbe
that6105IN/thatthat
the6106DTthe
court6107NNcourt
excluded6108VVDexclude
religious6109JJreligious
schools6110NNSschool
from6111INfrom
a6112DTa
general6113JJgeneral
program6114NNprogram
as6115INas
in6116INin
Trinity6117NPTrinity
Lutheran6118NPLutheran
.6119SENT.
So6120RBso
if6121INif
I6122PPI
could6123MDcould
just6124RBjust
address6125VVaddress
those6126DTthose
...6127:...
those6128DTthose
two6129CDtwo
theories6130NNStheory
of6131INof
the6132DTthe
case6133NNcase
by6134INby
Petitioners6135NNSpetitioner
.6136SENT.
So6137RBso
I6138PPI
think6139VVPthink
the6140DTthe
first6141JJfirst
argument6142NNargument
really6143RBreally
is6144VBZbe
tantamount6145JJtantamount
to6146TOto
an6147DTan
argument6148NNargument
that6149IN/thatthat
the6150DTthe
no-aid6151NNno-aid
clause6152NNclause
is6153VBZbe
facially6154RBfacially
unconstitutional6155JJunconstitutional
,6156,,
because6157INbecause
like6158INlike
every6159DTevery
single6160JJsingle
time6161NNtime
you6162PPyou
applied6163VVDapply
the6164DTthe
no-aid6165NNno-aid
clause6166NNclause
,6167,,
the6168DTthe
rule6169NNrule
it6170PPit
recites6171VVZrecite
is6172VBZbe
that6173IN/thatthat
religious6174JJreligious
schools6175NNSschool
do6176VVPdo
n't6177RBn't
get6178VVget
money6179NNmoney
because6180INbecause
...6181:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]6182LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well6183UHwell
,6184,,
I6185PPI
thought6186VVDthink
they6187PPthey
were6188VBDbe
quite6189RBquite
clear6190JJclear
,6191,,
that6192IN/thatthat
they6193PPthey
were6194VBDbe
not6195RBnot
arguing6196VVGargue
...6197:...
they6198PPthey
were6199VBDbe
not6200RBnot
making6201VVGmake
a6202DTa
facial6203JJfacial
challenge6204NNchallenge
.6205SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6206LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Right6207NPRight
.6208SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]6209LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
It6210PPit
was6211VBDbe
a6212DTa
challenge6213NNchallenge
as6214RBas
applied6215VVDapply
to6216TOto
the6217DTthe
particular6218JJparticular
situation6219NNsituation
here6220RBhere
.6221SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6222LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Right6223RBright
.6224SENT.
So6225RBso
if6226INif
...6227:...
if6228INif
that6229WDTthat
's6230VBZbe
the6231DTthe
case6232NNcase
,6233,,
and6234CCand
I6235PPI
...6236:...
I6237PPI
agree6238VVPagree
that6239IN/thatthat
that6240DTthat
's6241VBZbe
the6242DTthe
tenor6243NNtenor
of6244INof
Petitioners6245NNSpetitioner
'6246POS'
argument6247NNargument
.6248SENT.
I6249PPI
think6250VVPthink
the6251DTthe
government6252NNgovernment
was6253VBDbe
making6254VVGmake
a6255DTa
broader6256JJRbroad
argument6257NNargument
but6258CCbut
I6259PPI
think6260VVPthink
Petitioners6261NNSpetitioner
'6262POS'
argument6263NNargument
is6264VBZbe
more6265RBRmore
limited6266JJlimited
.6267SENT.
So6268RBso
if6269INif
...6270:...
if6271INif
it6272PPit
is6273VBZbe
the6274DTthe
case6275NNcase
that6276IN/thatthat
in6277INin
general6278NNgeneral
the6279DTthe
Court6280NPCourt
...6281:...
the6282DTthe
state6283NNstate
court6284NNcourt
can6285MDcan
apply6286VVapply
the6287DTthe
no-aid6288NNno-aid
clause6289NNclause
,6290,,
in6291INin
other6292JJother
words6293NNSword
,6294,,
it6295PPit
's6296VBZbe
not6297RBnot
just6298RBjust
facially6299RBfacially
discriminatory6300JJdiscriminatory
to6301TOto
say6302VVsay
because6303INbecause
something6304NNsomething
is6305VBZbe
religious6306JJreligious
...6307:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]6308LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well6309UHwell
,6310,,
they6311PPthey
're6312VBPbe
not6313RBnot
...6314:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6315LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
...6316:...
we6317PPwe
're6318VBPbe
not6319RBnot
...6320:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]6321LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
...6322:...
conceding6323VVGconcede
that6324DTthat
.6325SENT.
They6326PPthey
're6327VBPbe
just6328RBjust
saying6329VVGsay
you6330PPyou
have6331VHPhave
to6332TOto
consider6333VVconsider
it6334PPit
as6335RBas
applied6336VVDapply
here6337RBhere
.6338SENT.
Look6339VVlook
,6340,,
I6341PPI
...6342:...
I6343PPI
...6344:...
I6345PPI
like6346VVPlike
your6347PP$your
reaction6348NNreaction
to6349TOto
this6350DTthis
way6351NNway
of6352INof
looking6353VVGlook
at6354INat
the6355DTthe
case6356NNcase
.6357SENT.
Maybe6358RBmaybe
it6359PPit
's6360VBZbe
right6361JJright
;6362:;
maybe6363RBmaybe
it6364PPit
's6365VBZbe
wrong6366JJwrong
.6367SENT.
A6368DTa
...6369:...
it6370PPit
is6371VBZbe
a6372DTa
violation6373NNviolation
of6374INof
the6375DTthe
Federal6376NPFederal
Constitution6377NPConstitution
if6378INif
a6379DTa
state6380NNstate
Supreme6381NPSupreme
Court6382NPCourt
bases6383VVZbase
a6384DTa
decision6385NNdecision
on6386INon
a6387DTa
ground6388NNground
that6389WDTthat
discriminates6390VVZdiscriminate
in6391INin
violation6392NNviolation
of6393INof
the6394DTthe
constitution6395NNconstitution
.6396SENT.
Do6397VVdo
you6398PPyou
agree6399VVagree
with6400INwith
that6401DTthat
?6402SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6403LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I6404PPI
would6405MDwould
agree6406VVagree
with6407INwith
that6408DTthat
,6409,,
but6410CCbut
obviously6411RBobviously
the6412DTthe
question6413NNquestion
is6414VBZbe
whether6415INwhether
it6416PPit
discriminates6417VVZdiscriminate
in6418INin
violation6419NNviolation
of6420INof
the6421DTthe
Constitution6422NPConstitution
...6423:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]6424LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Okay6425NPOkay
.6426SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6427LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
...6428:...
the6429DTthe
last6430JJlast
part6431NNpart
of6432INof
that6433DTthat
.6434SENT.
Look6435NNlook
...6436:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]6437LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
All6438DTall
right6439NNright
.6440SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6441LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
...6442:...
I6443PPI
'm6444VBPbe
not6445RBnot
...6446:...
I6447PPI
'm6448VBPbe
not6449RBnot
objecting6450VVGobject
...6451:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]6452LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
The6453DTthe
argument6454NNargument
is6455VBZbe
if6456INif
they6457PPthey
...6458:...
they6459PPthey
do6460VVPdo
n't6461RBn't
have6462VHhave
to6463TOto
fund6464VVfund
private6465JJprivate
education6466NNeducation
at6467INat
all6468DTall
,6469,,
but6470CCbut
if6471INif
they6472PPthey
choose6473VVPchoose
to6474TOto
provide6475VVprovide
scholarships6476NNSscholarship
that6477WDTthat
are6478VBPbe
available6479JJavailable
to6480TOto
students6481NNSstudent
who6482WPwho
attend6483VVPattend
private6484JJprivate
schools6485NNSschool
,6486,,
they6487PPthey
can6488MDcan
't6489RB't
discriminate6490JJdiscriminate
against6491INagainst
parents6492NNSparent
who6493WPwho
want6494VVPwant
to6495TOto
send6496VVsend
their6497PP$their
children6498NNSchild
to6499TOto
schools6500NNSschool
that6501WDTthat
are6502VBPbe
affiliated6503VVNaffiliate
in6504INin
some6505DTsome
way6506NNway
with6507INwith
a6508DTa
church6509NNchurch
.6510SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6511LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So6512INso
I6513PPI
...6514:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]6515LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
That6516DTthat
's6517VBZbe
the6518DTthe
simple6519JJsimple
argument6520NNargument
.6521SENT.
And6522CCand
it6523PPit
's6524VBZbe
hard6525JJhard
to6526TOto
see6527VVsee
that6528IN/thatthat
that6529DTthat
's6530VBZbe
much6531RBmuch
different6532JJdifferent
from6533INfrom
Trinity6534NPTrinity
Lutheran6535NPLutheran
.6536SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6537LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No6538NPNo
,6539,,
I6540PPI
think6541VVPthink
it6542PPit
is6543VBZbe
completely6544RBcompletely
different6545JJdifferent
from6546INfrom
Trinity6547NPTrinity
Lutheran6548NPLutheran
.6549SENT.
So6550RBso
look6551VVlook
,6552,,
I6553PPI
'm6554VBPbe
not6555RBnot
going6556VVGgo
to6557TOto
object6558VVobject
to6559TOto
the6560DTthe
general6561JJgeneral
premise6562NNpremise
that6563IN/thatthat
Your6564PP$your
Honor6565NPHonor
offered6566VVNoffer
,6567,,
that6568IN/thatthat
if6569INif
there6570EXthere
's6571VBZbe
like6572INlike
a6573DTa
...6574:...
a6575DTa
...6576:...
a6577DTa
legal6578JJlegal
rule6579NNrule
,6580,,
just6581RBjust
the6582DTthe
very6583JJvery
application6584NNapplication
of6585INof
the6586DTthe
rule6587NNrule
is6588VBZbe
constitutionally6589RBconstitutionally
defective6590JJdefective
,6591,,
then6592RBthen
you6593PPyou
can6594MDcan
reverse6595VVreverse
the6596DTthe
state6597NNstate
court6598NNcourt
decision6599NNdecision
.6600SENT.
I'm6601NNI'm
...6602:...
I6603PPI
'm6604VBPbe
not6605RBnot
going6606VVGgo
to6607TOto
fight6608VVfight
that6609DTthat
proposition6610NNproposition
as6611INas
a6612DTa
general6613JJgeneral
matter6614NNmatter
.6615SENT.
But6616CCbut
that6617DTthat
's6618VBZbe
not6619RBnot
the6620DTthe
question6621NNquestion
here6622RBhere
.6623SENT.
I6624PPI
think6625VVPthink
the6626DTthe
question6627NNquestion
here6628RBhere
is6629VBZbe
whether6630INwhether
the6631DTthe
state6632NNstate
may6633MDmay
apply6634VVapply
a6635DTa
no-aid6636NNno-aid
clause6637NNclause
.6638SENT.
And6639CCand
I6640PPI
think6641VVPthink
that6642IN/thatthat
the6643DTthe
answer6644NNanswer
is6645VBZbe
yes6646UHyes
.6647SENT.
Because6648INbecause
if6649INif
you6650PPyou
accept6651VVPaccept
the6652DTthe
premise6653NNpremise
that6654IN/thatthat
the6655DTthe
...6656:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6657LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Counsel6658NPCounsel
,6659,,
would6660MDwould
n't6661RBn't
you6662PPyou
...6663:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6664LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yes6665NPYes
.6666SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6667LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
In6668INin
terms6669NNSterm
of6670INof
what6671WPwhat
you6672PPyou
're6673VBPbe
agreeing6674VVGagree
with6675INwith
Justice6676NPJustice
Alito6677NPAlito
,6678,,
I6679PPI
just6680RBjust
want6681VVPwant
to6682TOto
press6683VVpress
you6684PPyou
a6685DTa
little6686JJlittle
bit6687NNbit
further6688RBRfurther
.6689SENT.
Let6690VVlet
's6691VBZbe
say6692VVsay
a6693DTa
state6694NNstate
court6695NNcourt
decision6696NNdecision
could6697MDcould
be6698VBbe
consistent6699JJconsistent
with6700INwith
the6701DTthe
constitution6702NNconstitution
or6703CCor
not6704RBnot
consistent6705JJconsistent
with6706INwith
the6707DTthe
constitution6708NNconstitution
,6709,,
right6710RBright
?6711SENT?
The6712DTthe
outcome6713NNoutcome
may6714MDmay
or6715CCor
may6716MDmay
not6717RBnot
be6718VBbe
.6719SENT.
If6720INif
the6721DTthe
...6722:...
if6723INif
...6724:...
if6725INif
the6726DTthe
decision6727NNdecision
rests6728VVZrest
on6729INon
an6730DTan
erroneous6731JJerroneous
interpretation6732NNinterpretation
of6733INof
federal6734JJfederal
law6735NNlaw
and6736CCand
remedying6737VVGremedy
that6738DTthat
error6739NNerror
could6740MDcould
provide6741VVprovide
relief6742NNrelief
,6743,,
we6744PPwe
have6745VHPhave
a6746DTa
case6747NNcase
,6748,,
do6749VVPdo
n't6750RBn't
we6751PPwe
?6752SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6753LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I6754PPI
mean6755VVPmean
,6756,,
in6757INin
principle6758NNprinciple
,6759,,
if6760INif
we6761PPwe
assume6762VVPassume
there6763EXthere
's6764VBZbe
an6765DTan
error6766NNerror
of6767INof
federal6768JJfederal
law6769NNlaw
in6770INin
...6771:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6772LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Yes6773NPYes
.6774SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6775LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
...6776:...
the6777DTthe
court6778NNcourt
's6779POS's
decision6780NNdecision
...6781:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6782LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Assuming6783VVGassume
there6784EXthere
's6785VBZbe
an6786DTan
error6787NNerror
of6788INof
federal6789JJfederal
...6790:...
in6791INin
federal6792JJfederal
law6793NNlaw
and6794CCand
that6795IN/thatthat
remedying6796VVGremedy
it6797PPit
here6798RBhere
might6799MDmight
provide6800VVprovide
relief6801NNrelief
to6802TOto
plaintiffs6803NNSplaintiff
,6804,,
we6805PPwe
have6806VHPhave
a6807DTa
case6808NNcase
.6809SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6810LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I6811PPI
...6812:...
I6813PPI
...6814:...
so6815RBso
,6816,,
I6817PPI
think6818VVPthink
that6819IN/thatthat
,6820,,
yes6821UHyes
,6822,,
as6823INas
a6824DTa
general6825JJgeneral
matter6826NNmatter
,6827,,
at6828INat
a6829DTa
high6830JJhigh
level6831NNlevel
of6832INof
generality6833NNgenerality
,6834,,
if6835INif
Petitioners6836NNSpetitioner
identify6837VVPidentify
an6838DTan
error6839NNerror
of6840INof
federal6841JJfederal
law6842NNlaw
in6843INin
a6844DTa
lower6845JJRlow
court6846NNcourt
decision6847NNdecision
,6848,,
I6849PPI
think6850VVPthink
the6851DTthe
Court6852NPCourt
can6853MDcan
adjudicate6854VVadjudicate
the6855DTthe
error6856NNerror
federally6857RBfederally
.6858SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6859LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Okay6860NPOkay
.6861SENT.
So6862INso
the6863DTthe
question6864NNquestion
really6865RBreally
becomes6866VVZbecome
do6867VVdo
we6868PPwe
have6869VHPhave
an6870DTan
error6871NNerror
of6872INof
federal6873JJfederal
law6874NNlaw
here6875RBhere
?6876SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6877LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Right6878RBright
.6879SENT.
But6880CCbut
the6881DTthe
question6882NNquestion
is6883VBZbe
what6884WPwhat
becomes6885VVZbecome
an6886DTan
error6887NNerror
of6888INof
federal6889JJfederal
law6890NNlaw
.6891SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]6892LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Suppose6893VVPsuppose
...6894:...
suppose6895VVPsuppose
the6896DTthe
state6897NNstate
said6898VVDsay
we6899PPwe
're6900VBPbe
going6901VVGgo
to6902TOto
allow6903VVallow
the6904DTthe
scholarship6905NNscholarship
funds6906NNSfund
to6907TOto
be6908VBbe
used6909VVNuse
for6910INfor
secular6911JJsecular
schools6912NNSschool
or6913CCor
Protestant6914JJProtestant
schools6915NNSschool
but6916CCbut
not6917RBnot
for6918INfor
Jewish6919JJJewish
schools6920NNSschool
or6921CCor
Catholic6922JJCatholic
schools6923NNSschool
.6924SENT.
Unconstitutional6925JJunconstitutional
?6926SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6927LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yes6928NPYes
,6929,,
so6930RBso
I6931PPI
think6932VVPthink
that6933DTthat
...6934:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]6935LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Is6936VBZbe
that6937IN/thatthat
a6938DTa
yes6939NNyes
?6940SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6941LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yes6942NPYes
.6943SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]6944LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Okay6945NPOkay
.6946SENT.
So6947RBso
what6948WPwhat
's6949VBZbe
different6950JJdifferent
when6951WRBwhen
you6952PPyou
say6953VVPsay
the6954DTthe
scholarship6955NNscholarship
funds6956NNSfund
can6957MDcan
be6958VBbe
used6959VVNuse
for6960INfor
secular6961JJsecular
schools6962NNSschool
but6963CCbut
not6964RBnot
for6965INfor
Protestant6966JJProtestant
,6967,,
Jewish6968JJJewish
,6969,,
Catholic6970JJCatholic
or6971CCor
other6972JJother
religious6973JJreligious
schools6974NNSschool
because6975INbecause
of6976INof
the6977DTthe
religious6978JJreligious
status6979NNstatus
?6980SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]6981LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So6982RBso
,6983,,
I6984PPI
think6985VVPthink
the6986DTthe
right6987JJright
lens6988NNlens
to6989TOto
look6990VVlook
at6991INat
that6992DTthat
hypothetical6993JJhypothetical
is6994VBZbe
the6995DTthe
Establishment6996NNestablishment
Clause6997NNclause
,6998,,
which6999WDTwhich
prohibits7000VVZprohibit
the7001DTthe
state7002NNstate
...7003:...
regardless7004RBregardless
of7005INof
whether7006INwhether
there7007EXthere
's7008VBZbe
an7009DTan
infringement7010NNinfringement
on7011INon
any7012DTany
individual7013JJindividual
liberty7014NNliberty
,7015,,
I7016PPI
think7017VVPthink
the7018DTthe
Establishment7019NNestablishment
Clause7020NNclause
prohibits7021VVZprohibit
the7022DTthe
state7023NNstate
from7024INfrom
distinguishing7025VVGdistinguish
between7026INbetween
one7027CDone
religion7028NNreligion
versus7029INversus
a7030DTa
different7031JJdifferent
religion7032NNreligion
.7033SENT.
And7034CCand
I7035PPI
think7036VVPthink
that7037DTthat
's7038VBZbe
an7039DTan
example7040NNexample
...7041:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7042LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But7043CCbut
a7044DTa
lot7045NNlot
of7046INof
the7047DTthe
free-exercise7048NNfree-exercise
equal-treatment7049NNequal-treatment
cases7050NNScase
,7051,,
going7052VVGgo
back7053RBback
to7054TOto
Everson7055NPEverson
,7056,,
McDaniel7057NPMcDaniel
,7058,,
say7059VVPsay
you7060PPyou
can7061MDcan
't7062RB't
exclude7063VVPexclude
religious7064JJreligious
people7065NNSpeople
,7066,,
religious7067JJreligious
institutions7068NNSinstitution
,7069,,
religious7070JJreligious
speech7071NNspeech
because7072INbecause
it7073PPit
's7074VBZbe
religious7075JJreligious
from7076INfrom
a7077DTa
generally7078RBgenerally
applicable7079JJapplicable
program7080NNprogram
...7081:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7082LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Right7083RBright
.7084SENT.
So7085RBso
...7086:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7087LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...7088:...
the7089DTthe
fact7090NNfact
that7091IN/thatthat
it7092PPit
's7093VBZbe
odious7094JJodious
to7095TOto
the7096DTthe
Constitution7097NPConstitution
to7098TOto
quote7099VVquote
the7100DTthe
words7101NNSword
of7102INof
Trinity7103NPTrinity
Lutheran7104NPLutheran
.7105SENT.
So7106RBso
why7107WRBwhy
is7108VBZbe
n't7109RBn't
this7110DTthis
excluding7111VVGexclude
religious7112JJreligious
people7113NNSpeople
,7114,,
telling7115VVGtell
them7116PPthem
that7117IN/thatthat
they7118PPthey
're7119VBPbe
not7120RBnot
entitled7121VVNentitle
to7122TOto
equal7123VVequal
treatment7124NNtreatment
under7125INunder
the7126DTthe
Constitution7127NPConstitution
,7128,,
why7129WRBwhy
is7130VBZbe
n't7131RBn't
that7132IN/thatthat
a7133DTa
violation7134NNviolation
of7135INof
...7136:...
a7137DTa
straight7138JJstraight
violation7139NNviolation
of7140INof
the7141DTthe
Trinity7142NPTrinity
Lutheran7143NPLutheran
principle7144NNprinciple
which7145WDTwhich
goes7146VVZgo
back7147RBback
to7148TOto
Everson7149NPEverson
...7150:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7151LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Because7152INbecause
I7153PPI
think7154VVPthink
...7155:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7156LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And7157CCand
why7158WRBwhy
is7159VBZbe
it7160PPit
different7161JJdifferent
from7162INfrom
other7163JJother
hypothetical7164JJhypothetical
?7165SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7166LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I7167PPI
think7168VVPthink
the7169DTthe
state7170NNstate
has7171VHZhave
a7172DTa
choice7173NNchoice
,7174,,
right7175RBright
?7176SENT?
It7177PPit
's7178VBZbe
not7179RBnot
allowed7180VVNallow
to7181TOto
tell7182VVtell
people7183NNSpeople
we7184PPwe
are7185VBPbe
going7186VVGgo
to7187TOto
penalize7188VVpenalize
you7189PPyou
for7190INfor
exercising7191VVGexercise
your7192PP$your
religion7193NNreligion
.7194SENT.
That7195DTthat
's7196VBZbe
a7197DTa
prohibition7198NNprohibition
.7199SENT.
I7200PPI
think7201VVPthink
that7202IN/thatthat
the7203DTthe
core7204JJcore
insight7205NNinsight
of7206INof
a7207DTa
case7208NNcase
like7209INlike
Trinity7210NPTrinity
Lutheran7211NPLutheran
is7212VBZbe
that7213IN/thatthat
there7214EXthere
's7215VBZbe
no7216DTno
difference7217NNdifference
between7218INbetween
the7219DTthe
denial7220NNdenial
of7221INof
a7222DTa
benefit7223NNbenefit
and7224CCand
a7225DTa
fine7226NNfine
.7227SENT.
That7228DTthat
's7229VBZbe
a7230DTa
prohibition7231NNprohibition
because7232INbecause
you7233PPyou
're7234VBPbe
actually7235RBactually
penalizing7236VVGpenalize
the7237DTthe
decision7238NNdecision
to7239TOto
exercise7240VVexercise
religion7241NNreligion
.7242SENT.
That7243DTthat
does7244VVZdo
n't7245RBn't
mean7246VVmean
that7247IN/thatthat
the7248DTthe
state7249NNstate
has7250VHZhave
to7251TOto
fund7252VVfund
religious7253JJreligious
schools7254NNSschool
and7255CCand
it7256PPit
also7257RBalso
does7258VVZdo
n't7259RBn't
mean7260VVmean
the7261DTthe
state7262NNstate
can7263MDcan
't7264RB't
just7265RBjust
apply7266VVapply
a7267DTa
principled7268JJprincipled
view7269NNview
that7270IN/thatthat
it7271PPit
does7272VVZdo
n't7273RBn't
want7274VVwant
...7275:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7276LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But7277CCbut
if7278INif
you7279PPyou
're7280VBPbe
a7281DTa
...7282:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7283LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
...7284:...
to7285TOto
get7286VVget
involved7287VVNinvolve
in7288INin
religious7289JJreligious
education7290NNeducation
.7291SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7292LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
If7293INif
you7294PPyou
're7295VBPbe
running7296VVGrun
a7297DTa
scholarship7298NNscholarship
fund7299NNfund
and7300CCand
there7301EXthere
's7302VBZbe
a7303DTa
group7304NNgroup
of7305INof
people7306NNSpeople
lining7307VVGline
up7308RPup
for7309INfor
the7310DTthe
scholarships7311NNSscholarship
,7312,,
are7313VBPbe
you7314PPyou
secular7315JJsecular
?7316SENT?
Okay7317RBokay
,7318,,
you7319PPyou
can7320MDcan
get7321VVget
it7322PPit
?7323SENT?
Are7324VBPbe
you7325PPyou
Catholic7326JJCatholic
?7327SENT?
No7328UHNo
,7329,,
you7330PPyou
're7331VBPbe
out7332RBout
because7333INbecause
you7334PPyou
're7335VBPbe
Catholic7336JJCatholic
.7337SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7338LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yeah7339NPYeah
,7340,,
that7341WDTthat
's7342VBZbe
exactly7343RBexactly
what7344WPwhat
the7345DTthe
state7346NNstate
...7347:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7348LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
How7349WRBHow
is7350VBZbe
that7351DTthat
...7352:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7353LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
...7354:...
court7355NNcourt
is7356VBZbe
not7357RBnot
doing7358VVGdo
in7359INin
this7360DTthis
case7361NNcase
.7362SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7363LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
How7364NPHow
is7365VBZbe
that7366DTthat
...7367:...
how7368WRBhow
is7369VBZbe
that7370IN/thatthat
consistent7371JJconsistent
with7372INwith
the7373DTthe
principle7374NNprinciple
set7375VVDset
forth7376RBforth
in7377INin
Trinity7378NPTrinity
Lutheran7379NPLutheran
or7380CCor
McDaniel7381NPMcDaniel
,7382,,
Justice7383NPJustice
Brennan7384NPBrennan
's7385POS's
concurrence7386NNconcurrence
in7387INin
McDaniel7388NPMcDaniel
?7389SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7390LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I7391PPI
think7392VVPthink
that7393WDTthat
's7394VBZbe
exactly7395RBexactly
what7396WPwhat
the7397DTthe
state7398NNstate
court7399NNcourt
ensured7400VVNensure
would7401MDwould
n't7402RBn't
happen7403VVhappen
.7404SENT.
It7405PPit
's7406VBZbe
not7407RBnot
just7408RBjust
a7409DTa
matter7410NNmatter
of7411INof
like7412JJlike
...7413:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7414LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
The7415DTthe
predicate7416NNpredicate
...7417:...
the7418DTthe
predicate7419NNpredicate
was7420VBDbe
that7421IN/thatthat
that7422DTthat
kind7423NNkind
of7424INof
discrimination7425NNdiscrimination
is7426VBZbe
...7427:...
does7428VVZdo
not7429RBnot
violate7430VVviolate
the7431DTthe
Federal7432NPFederal
Constitution7433NPConstitution
.7434SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7435LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No7436NPNo
,7437,,
I7438PPI
...7439:...
I7440PPI
...7441:...
I7442PPI
think7443VVPthink
that7444IN/thatthat
the7445DTthe
state7446NNstate
court7447NNcourt
can7448MDcan
say7449VVsay
,7450,,
look7451VVlook
,7452,,
as7453INas
a7454DTa
state7455NNstate
,7456,,
we7457PPwe
have7458VHPhave
a7459DTa
no-aid7460NNno-aid
clause7461NNclause
clause7462NNclause
.7463SENT.
We7464PPwe
have7465VHPhave
a7466DTa
principled7467JJprincipled
objection7468NNobjection
to7469TOto
funding7470NNfunding
of7471INof
religious7472JJreligious
institutions7473NNSinstitution
,7474,,
but7475CCbut
we7476PPwe
understand7477VVPunderstand
that7478IN/thatthat
this7479DTthis
sort7480NNsort
of7481INof
classification7482NNclassification
of7483INof
coercing7484VVGcoerce
people7485NNSpeople
on7486INon
to7487TOto
being7488JJbeing
secular7489NNsecular
is7490VBZbe
a7491DTa
penalty7492NNpenalty
on7493INon
religion7494NNreligion
.7495SENT.
So7496RBso
to7497TOto
balance7498VVbalance
those7499DTthose
two7500CDtwo
interests7501NNSinterest
,7502,,
we7503PPwe
're7504VBPbe
going7505VVGgo
to7506TOto
simply7507RBsimply
level7508VVlevel
down7509RPdown
.7510SENT.
And7511CCand
I7512PPI
just7513RBjust
want7514VVPwant
to7515TOto
be7516VBbe
clear7517JJclear
,7518,,
we7519PPwe
're7520VBPbe
not7521RBnot
defending7522VVGdefend
religious7523JJreligious
bigotry7524NNbigotry
here7525RBhere
,7526,,
okay7527JJokay
?7528SENT?
I7529PPI
think7530VVPthink
no-aid7531NNno-aid
clauses7532NNSclause
have7533VHPhave
a7534DTa
principal7535JJprincipal
justification7536NNjustification
,7537,,
especially7538RBespecially
in7539INin
Montana7540NPMontana
.7541SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7542LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well7543UHwell
,7544,,
they7545PPthey
're7546VBPbe
...7547:...
they7548PPthey
're7549VBPbe
certainly7550RBcertainly
rooted7551VVNroot
in7552INin
...7553:...
in7554INin
grotesque7555JJgrotesque
religious7556JJreligious
bigotry7557NNbigotry
against7558INagainst
Catholics7559NPSCatholics
.7560SENT.
You7561PPyou
agree7562VVPagree
with7563INwith
that7564DTthat
?7565SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7566LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I7567PPI
mean7568VVPmean
,7569,,
I7570PPI
think7571VVPthink
that7572IN/thatthat
in7573INin
the7574DTthe
1880s7575JJ1880s
,7576,,
there7577EXthere
was7578VBDbe
undoubtedly7579RBundoubtedly
grotesque7580JJgrotesque
religious7581JJreligious
bigotry7582NNbigotry
against7583INagainst
...7584:...
against7585INagainst
Catholics7586NPSCatholics
.7587SENT.
I7588PPI
do7589VVPdo
n't7590RBn't
think7591VVthink
that7592WDTthat
's7593VBZbe
...7594:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7595LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
That7596DTthat
was7597VBDbe
the7598DTthe
...7599:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7600LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
...7601:...
comes7602VVZcome
out7603RPout
in7604INin
the7605DTthe
...7606:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7607LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...7608:...
clear7609JJclear
motivation7610NNmotivation
for7611INfor
this7612DTthis
.7613SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7614LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No7615NPNo
,7616,,
not7617RBnot
...7618:...
that7619WDTthat
's7620VBZbe
not7621RBnot
true7622JJtrue
.7623SENT.
In7624INin
the7625DTthe
19727626CD@card@
Constitution7627NPConstitution
,7628,,
which7629WDTwhich
is7630VBZbe
where7631WRBwhere
this7632DTthis
provision7633NNprovision
was7634VBDbe
enacted7635VVNenact
,7636,,
I7637PPI
do7638VVPdo
n't7639RBn't
think7640VVthink
there7641EXthere
's7642VBZbe
any7643DTany
evidence7644NNevidence
whatsoever7645RBwhatsoever
of7646INof
any7647DTany
anti-religious7648JJanti-religious
bigotry7649NNbigotry
.7650SENT.
I7651PPI
think7652VVPthink
the7653DTthe
...7654:...
yes7655UHyes
,7656,,
Your7657PP$your
Honor7658NPHonor
?7659SENT?
I7660PPI
'm7661VBPbe
sorry7662JJsorry
.7663SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]7664LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
No7665NPNo
,7666,,
I7667PPI
...7668:...
I7669PPI
want7670VVPwant
to7671TOto
...7672:...
to7673TOto
see7674VVsee
if7675INif
there7676EXthere
's7677VBZbe
any7678DTany
real7679JJreal
difference7680NNdifference
between7681INbetween
this7682DTthis
and7683CCand
Trinity7684NPTrinity
Lutheran7685NPLutheran
.7686SENT.
So7687RBso
what7688WPwhat
the7689DTthe
...7690:...
excuse7691VVexcuse
me7692PPme
...7693:...
what7694WPwhat
Article7695NPArticle
X7696NPX
,7697,,
Section7698NPSection
67699CD6
of7700INof
the7701DTthe
Montana7702NPMontana
Constitution7703NPConstitution
says7704VVZsay
that7705IN/thatthat
there7706EXthere
can7707MDcan
't7708RB't
be7709VBbe
any7710DTany
aid7711NNaid
,7712,,
indirect7713JJindirect
or7714CCor
direct7715JJdirect
,7716,,
to7717TOto
any7718DTany
institution7719NNinstitution
,7720,,
school7721NNschool
,7722,,
or7723CCor
other7724JJother
institution7725NNinstitution
controlled7726VVNcontrol
in7727INin
whole7728JJwhole
or7729CCor
in7730INin
part7731NNpart
by7732INby
any7733DTany
church7734NNchurch
,7735,,
sect7736NNsect
,7737,,
or7738CCor
denomination7739NNdenomination
.7740SENT.
So7741RBso
if7742INif
you7743PPyou
have7744VHPhave
a7745DTa
school7746NNschool
that7747WDTthat
has7748VHZhave
a7749DTa
board7750NNboard
of7751INof
trustees7752NNStrustee
and7753CCand
one7754CDone
or7755CCor
more7756JJRmore
of7757INof
the7758DTthe
board7759NNboard
...7760:...
members7761NNSmember
of7762INof
the7763DTthe
board7764NNboard
of7765INof
trustees7766NNStrustee
ex7767JJex
officio7768NNofficio
are7769VBPbe
members7770NNSmember
of7771INof
a7772DTa
religious7773JJreligious
body7774NNbody
,7775,,
that7776WDTthat
would7777MDwould
seem7778VVseem
to7779TOto
provide7780VVprovide
control7781NNcontrol
,7782,,
in7783INin
part7784NNpart
.7785SENT.
Would7786MDwould
that7787RBthat
be7788VBbe
sufficient7789JJsufficient
under7790INunder
the7791DTthe
Montana7792NPMontana
Constitution7793NPConstitution
,7794,,
without7795INwithout
looking7796VVGlook
at7797INat
all7798DTall
at7799INat
the7800DTthe
nature7801NNnature
of7802INof
the7803DTthe
education7804NNeducation
provided7805VVNprovide
by7806INby
the7807DTthe
school7808NNschool
?7809SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7810LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No7811NPNo
,7812,,
I7813PPI
do7814VVPdo
n't7815RBn't
think7816VVthink
so7817RBso
.7818SENT.
That7819DTthat
's7820VBZbe
not7821RBnot
how7822WRBhow
the7823DTthe
state7824NNstate
court7825NNcourt
has7826VHZhave
construed7827VVNconstrue
the7828DTthe
Constitution7829NPConstitution
...7830:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]7831LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Where7832WRBwhere
has7833VHZhave
it7834PPit
said7835VVNsay
...7836:...
where7837WRBwhere
has7838VHZhave
it7839PPit
said7840VVDsay
that7841IN/thatthat
that7842DTthat
's7843VBZbe
not7844RBnot
how7845WRBhow
it7846PPit
's7847VBZbe
construed7848VVNconstrue
?7849SENT?
That7850DTthat
's7851VBZbe
control7852NNcontrol
in7853INin
...7854:...
in7855INin
part7856NNpart
.7857SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7858LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So7859RBso
if7860INif
you7861PPyou
read7862VVPread
the7863DTthe
lower7864JJRlow
court7865NNcourt
opinion7866NNopinion
,7867,,
there7868EXthere
's7869VBZbe
all7870PDTall
this7871DTthis
language7872NNlanguage
about7873INabout
how7874WRBhow
the7875DTthe
real7876JJreal
problem7877NNproblem
here7878RBhere
is7879VBZbe
that7880IN/thatthat
the7881DTthe
money7882NNmoney
is7883VBZbe
going7884VVGgo
to7885TOto
the7886DTthe
school7887NNschool
,7888,,
which7889WDTwhich
is7890VBZbe
going7891VVGgo
to7892TOto
spend7893VVspend
it7894PPit
on7895INon
religious7896JJreligious
education7897NNeducation
.7898SENT.
The7899DTthe
language7900NNlanguage
...7901:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]7902LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well7903UHwell
,7904,,
they7905PPthey
're7906VBPbe
talking7907VVGtalk
about7908INabout
schools7909NNSschool
in7910INin
general7911NNgeneral
.7912SENT.
How7913WRBHow
do7914VVPdo
they7915PPthey
know7916VVPknow
what7917WPwhat
schools7918NNSschool
they7919PPthey
're7920VBPbe
talking7921VVGtalk
about7922RBabout
?7923SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]7924LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No7925NPNo
,7926,,
they7927PPthey
're7928VBPbe
...7929:...
they7930PPthey
're7931VBPbe
saying7932VVGsay
...7933:...
they7934PPthey
're7935VBPbe
not7936RBnot
talking7937VVGtalk
about7938INabout
schools7939NNSschool
in7940INin
general7941NNgeneral
.7942SENT.
There7943EXthere
's7944VBZbe
all7945PDTall
this7946DTthis
language7947NNlanguage
saying7948VVGsay
that7949IN/thatthat
money7950NNmoney
is7951VBZbe
going7952VVGgo
to7953TOto
go7954VVgo
to7955TOto
a7956DTa
school7957NNschool
and7958CCand
,7959,,
therefore7960RBtherefore
,7961,,
the7962DTthe
money7963NNmoney
...7964:...
the7965DTthe
school7966NNschool
is7967VBZbe
going7968VVGgo
to7969TOto
spend7970VVspend
that7971DTthat
money7972NNmoney
on7973INon
explicitly7974RBexplicitly
religious7975JJreligious
education7976NNeducation
.7977SENT.
If7978INif
I7979PPI
could7980MDcould
just7981RBjust
step7982VVstep
back7983RBback
,7984,,
look7985VVlook
,7986,,
I7987PPI
'm7988VBPbe
agreeing7989VVGagree
...7990:...
I7991PPI
agree7992VVPagree
that7993IN/thatthat
the7994DTthe
...7995:...
the7996DTthe
lower7997JJRlow
court7998NNcourt
opinion7999NNopinion
is8000VBZbe
not8001RBnot
completely8002RBcompletely
clear8003JJclear
on8004INon
this8005DTthis
.8006SENT.
I8007PPI
mean8008VVPmean
,8009,,
part8010NNpart
of8011INof
the8012DTthe
problem8013NNproblem
is8014VBZbe
I8015PPI
think8016VVPthink
that8017IN/thatthat
this8018DTthis
...8019:...
this8020DTthis
challenge8021NNchallenge
has8022VHZhave
really8023RBreally
changed8024VVNchange
in8025INin
this8026DTthis
Court8027NPCourt
.8028SENT.
In8029INin
the8030DTthe
lower8031JJRlow
court8032NNcourt
,8033,,
it8034PPit
was8035VBDbe
n't8036RBn't
the8037DTthe
no-aid8038NNno-aid
clause8039NNclause
that8040WDTthat
was8041VBDbe
really8042RBreally
being8043VBGbe
challenged8044VVNchallenge
;8045:;
it8046PPit
was8047VBDbe
the8048DTthe
rule8049NNrule
.8050SENT.
And8051CCand
so8052RBso
I8053PPI
do8054VVPdo
n't8055RBn't
think8056VVthink
...8057:...
I8058PPI
mean8059VVPmean
,8060,,
I8061PPI
think8062VVPthink
the8063DTthe
state8064NNstate
courts8065NNScourt
in8066INin
general8067NNgeneral
should8068MDshould
be8069VBbe
entitled8070VVNentitle
to8071TOto
adopt8072VVadopt
limiting8073VVGlimit
constructions8074NNSconstruction
of8075INof
their8076PP$their
own8077JJown
state8078NNstate
constitutions8079NNSconstitution
.8080SENT.
I8081PPI
just8082RBjust
do8083VVPdo
n't8084RBn't
think8085VVthink
the8086DTthe
state8087NNstate
court8088NNcourt
had8089VHDhave
the8090DTthe
chance8091NNchance
to8092TOto
do8093VVdo
that8094IN/thatthat
here8095RBhere
because8096INbecause
the8097DTthe
argument8098NNargument
was8099VBDbe
n't8100RBn't
really8101RBreally
raised8102VVNraise
.8103SENT.
And8104CCand
I8105PPI
think8106VVPthink
it8107PPit
would8108MDwould
be8109VBbe
a8110DTa
little8111RBlittle
unfair8112JJunfair
in8113INin
this8114DTthis
Court8115NPCourt
to8116TOto
sort8117VVsort
of8118INof
assume8119VVassume
the8120DTthe
broadest8121JJSbroad
possible8122JJpossible
interpretation8123NNinterpretation
of8124INof
the8125DTthe
state8126NNstate
constitution8127NNconstitution
just8128RBjust
for8129INfor
purposes8130NNSpurpose
of8131INof
...8132:...
of8133INof
like8134INlike
invalidating8135VVGinvalidate
it8136PPit
.8137SENT.
At8138INat
minimum8139NNminimum
...8140:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8141LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
May8142MDmay
I8143PPI
ask8144VVask
you8145PPyou
a8146DTa
question8147NNquestion
?8148SENT?
Let8149VVlet
's8150VBZbe
go8151VVgo
back8152RBback
to8153TOto
the8154DTthe
basic8155JJbasic
,8156,,
okay8157JJokay
?8158SENT?
Let8159VVlet
's8160VBZbe
take8161VVtake
the8162DTthe
proposition8163NNproposition
here8164RBhere
that8165IN/thatthat
the8166DTthe
law8167NNlaw
as8168INas
written8169JJwritten
giving8170VVGgive
aid8171NNaid
discriminated8172VVDdiscriminate
.8173SENT.
I8174PPI
know8175VVPknow
you8176PPyou
're8177VBPbe
challenge8178NNchallenge
that8179IN/thatthat
,8180,,
okay8181JJokay
?8182SENT?
But8183CCbut
that8184IN/thatthat
it8185PPit
violates8186VVZviolate
the8187DTthe
U8188NPU
.8189SENT.
S8190NPS
.8191SENT.
Constitution8192NPConstitution
...8193:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8194LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yes8195NPYes
.8196SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8197LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...8198:...
because8199INbecause
...8200:...
Rule8201NNrule
does8202VVZdo
because8203INbecause
it8204PPit
permits8205VVZpermit
secular8206JJsecular
schools8207NNSschool
but8208CCbut
not8209RBnot
religious8210JJreligious
schools8211NNSschool
from8212INfrom
receiving8213VVGreceive
the8214DTthe
scholarship8215NNscholarship
.8216SENT.
I8217PPI
know8218VVPknow
you8219PPyou
take8220VVtake
as8221INas
a8222DTa
defense8223NNdefense
position8224NNposition
that8225IN/thatthat
they8226PPthey
can8227MDcan
do8228VVdo
that8229DTthat
.8230SENT.
Putting8231VVGput
that8232IN/thatthat
aside8233RBaside
,8234,,
you8235PPyou
're8236VBPbe
wrong8237JJwrong
.8238SENT.
Assume8239VVassume
that8240DTthat
.8241SENT.
Okay8242JJokay
?8243SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8244LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I8245PPI
accept8246VVPaccept
I8247PPI
'm8248VBPbe
wrong8249JJwrong
,8250,,
yes8251UHyes
.8252SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8253LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
All8254DTall
right8255NNright
.8256SENT.
Now8257RBnow
,8258,,
there8259EXthere
was8260VBDbe
a8261DTa
suggestion8262NNsuggestion
in8263INin
an8264DTan
earlier8265JJRearly
question8266NNquestion
that8267IN/thatthat
if8268INif
you8269PPyou
were8270VBDbe
wrong8271JJwrong
,8272,,
and8273CCand
the8274DTthe
Montana8275NPMontana
Supreme8276NPSupreme
Court8277NPCourt
in8278INin
turn8279NNturn
uses8280VVZuse
the8281DTthe
Montana8282NPMontana
Constitution8283NPConstitution
to8284TOto
level8285VVlevel
down8286RBdown
,8287,,
that8288IN/thatthat
it8289PPit
is8290VBZbe
unconstitutionally8291RBunconstitutionally
acting8292VVGact
,8293,,
that8294IN/thatthat
it8295PPit
is8296VBZbe
using8297VVGuse
religion8298NNreligion
to8299TOto
level8300VVlevel
down8301RPdown
.8302SENT.
How8303WRBHow
do8304VVPdo
you8305PPyou
answer8306VVanswer
that8307DTthat
argument8308NNargument
?8309SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8310LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Because8311INbecause
...8312:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8313LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Because8314INbecause
that8315WDTthat
's8316VBZbe
exactly8317RBexactly
what8318WPwhat
we8319PPwe
were8320VBDbe
told8321VVNtell
in8322INin
a8323DTa
question8324NNquestion
,8325,,
which8326WDTwhich
is8327VBZbe
they8328PPthey
are8329VBPbe
basing8330VVGbase
the8331DTthe
leveling8332NNleveling
down8333RBdown
on8334INon
the8335DTthe
basis8336NNbasis
of8337INof
discriminating8338VVGdiscriminate
against8339INagainst
religion8340NNreligion
.8341SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8342LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So8343INso
I8344PPI
think8345VVPthink
that8346IN/thatthat
the8347DTthe
answering8348NNanswering
of8349INof
that8350DTthat
question8351NNquestion
requires8352VVZrequire
a8353DTa
kind8354NNkind
of8355INof
focused8356VVNfocus
analysis8357NNanalysis
of8358INof
exactly8359RBexactly
what8360WPwhat
the8361DTthe
Constitution8362NPConstitution
allows8363VVZallow
and8364CCand
does8365VVZdo
n't8366RBn't
allow8367VVallow
,8368,,
all8369DTall
right8370NNright
?8371SENT?
So8372RBso
if8373INif
you8374PPyou
accept8375VVPaccept
the8376DTthe
premise8377NNpremise
that8378IN/thatthat
Rule8379NPRule
is8380VBZbe
unconstitutional8381JJunconstitutional
because8382INbecause
it8383PPit
discriminates8384VVZdiscriminate
,8385,,
it8386PPit
says8387VVZsay
secular8388JJsecular
schools8389NNSschool
in8390INin
and8391CCand
religious8392JJreligious
schools8393NNSschool
out8394RBout
,8395,,
that8396WDTthat
does8397VVZdo
n't8398RBn't
answer8399VVanswer
the8400DTthe
question8401NNquestion
of8402INof
whether8403INwhether
the8404DTthe
mere8405JJmere
application8406NNapplication
of8407INof
a8408DTa
no-aid8409NNno-aid
clause8410NNclause
that8411WDTthat
does8412VVZdo
not8413RBnot
lead8414VVlead
to8415TOto
a8416DTa
judgment8417NNjudgment
with8418INwith
that8419DTthat
effect8420NNeffect
is8421VBZbe
also8422RBalso
unconstitutional8423JJunconstitutional
.8424SENT.
So8425RBso
I8426PPI
think8427VVPthink
the8428DTthe
crucial8429JJcrucial
point8430NNpoint
in8431INin
this8432DTthis
case8433NNcase
is8434VBZbe
to8435TOto
look8436VVlook
at8437INat
what8438WPwhat
the8439DTthe
state8440NNstate
court8441NNcourt
did8442VVDdo
when8443WRBwhen
it8444PPit
applied8445VVDapply
the8446DTthe
no-aid8447NNno-aid
clause8448NNclause
.8449SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]8450LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
No8451NPNo
,8452,,
is8453VBZbe
n't8454RBn't
the8455DTthe
crucial8456JJcrucial
question8457NNquestion
why8458WRBwhy
the8459DTthe
state8460NNstate
court8461NNcourt
did8462VVDdo
what8463WPwhat
it8464PPit
did8465VVDdo
?8466SENT?
If8467INif
it8468PPit
did8469VVDdo
what8470WPwhat
it8471PPit
did8472VVDdo
for8473INfor
an8474DTan
unconstitutionally8475RBunconstitutionally
discriminatory8476JJdiscriminatory
reason8477NNreason
,8478,,
then8479RBthen
there8480EXthere
's8481VBZbe
a8482DTa
problem8483NNproblem
under8484INunder
Village8485NPVillage
of8486INof
Arlington8487NPArlington
Heights8488NPHeights
.8489SENT.
So8490RBso
I8491PPI
'll8492MDwill
give8493VVgive
you8494PPyou
an8495DTan
example8496NNexample
.8497SENT.
The8498DTthe
state8499NNstate
legislature8500NNlegislature
sets8501VVZset
up8502RPup
a8503DTa
scholarship8504NNscholarship
fund8505NNfund
,8506,,
and8507CCand
after8508INafter
a8509DTa
while8510NNwhile
,8511,,
people8512NNSpeople
look8513VVPlook
at8514INat
the8515DTthe
...8516:...
the8517DTthe
recipients8518NNSrecipient
of8519INof
the8520DTthe
scholarships8521NNSscholarship
,8522,,
and8523CCand
some8524DTsome
people8525NNSpeople
say8526VVPsay
:8527::
Wow8528NNwow
,8529,,
these8530DTthese
are8531VBPbe
mostly8532RBmostly
going8533VVGgo
to8534TOto
blacks8535NNSblack
and8536CCand
we8537PPwe
do8538VVPdo
n't8539RBn't
like8540VVlike
that8541IN/thatthat
and8542CCand
that8543DTthat
's8544VBZbe
contrary8545JJcontrary
to8546TOto
state8547NNstate
law8548NNlaw
.8549SENT.
So8550INso
the8551DTthe
state8552NNstate
supreme8553NNsupreme
court8554NNcourt
says8555VVZsay
:8556::
Okay8557JJokay
,8558,,
that8559DTthat
discrimination8560NNdiscrimination
is8561VBZbe
...8562:...
we8563PPwe
're8564VBPbe
going8565VVGgo
to8566TOto
strike8567VVstrike
down8568RPdown
the8569DTthe
whole8570JJwhole
thing8571NNthing
.8572SENT.
Is8573VBZbe
that8574IN/thatthat
constitutional8575JJconstitutional
?8576SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8577LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No8578NPNo
,8579,,
so8580RBso
we8581PPwe
do8582VVPdo
n't8583RBn't
think8584VVthink
the8585DTthe
race8586NNrace
analogy8587NNanalogy
is8588VBZbe
apt8589JJapt
.8590SENT.
I8591PPI
do8592VVPdo
n't8593RBn't
think8594VVthink
that8595WDTthat
's8596VBZbe
constitutional8597JJconstitutional
,8598,,
and8599CCand
we8600PPwe
just8601RBjust
do8602VVPdo
n't8603RBn't
think8604VVthink
that8605DTthat
race8606NNrace
and8607CCand
religion8608NNreligion
are8609VBPbe
identical8610JJidentical
for8611INfor
all8612DTall
constitutional8613JJconstitutional
...8614:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]8615LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
What8616WPWhat
they8617PPthey
're8618VBPbe
...8619:...
what8620WPwhat
he8621PPhe
's8622VBZbe
saying8623VVGsay
is8624VBZbe
that8625IN/thatthat
,8626,,
look8627VVlook
,8628,,
the8629DTthe
Court8630NPCourt
took8631VVDtake
the8632DTthe
case8633NNcase
in8634INin
the8635DTthe
Prince8636NPPrince
...8637:...
Prince8638NPPrince
Edward8639NPEdward
County8640NPCounty
thing8641NNthing
...8642:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8643LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yes8644NPYes
.8645SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8646LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...8647:...
or8648CCor
the8649DTthe
equivalent8650NNequivalent
and8651CCand
said8652VVDsay
they8653PPthey
could8654MDcould
n't8655RBn't
do8656VVdo
that8657DTthat
.8658SENT.
They8659PPthey
can8660MDcan
't8661RB't
shut8662VVDshut
down8663RBdown
all8664PDTall
the8665DTthe
schools8666NNSschool
,8667,,
even8668RBeven
though8669INthough
the8670DTthe
Constitution8671NPConstitution
they8672PPthey
did8673VVDdo
n't8674RBn't
say8675VVPsay
had8676VHDhave
a8677DTa
right8678NNright
and8679CCand
so8680RBso
that8681WDTthat
's8682VBZbe
the8683DTthe
similarity8684NNsimilarity
.8685SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8686LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So8687INso
I8688PPI
...8689:...
I8690PPI
assume8691VVPassume
the8692DTthe
...8693:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]8694LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I8695PPI
think8696VVPthink
,8697,,
Justice8698NPJustice
...8699:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8700LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I8701PPI
have8702VHPhave
an8703DTan
answer8704NNanswer
...8705:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]8706LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But8707CCbut
I8708PPI
have8709VHPhave
...8710:...
I8711PPI
'd8712MDwould
like8713VVlike
you8714PPyou
to8715TOto
think8716VVthink
about8717INabout
that8718DTthat
...8719:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8720LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Look8721NNlook
...8722:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]8723LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...8724:...
but8725CCbut
I8726PPI
have8727VHPhave
a8728DTa
more8729RBRmore
direct8730JJdirect
question8731NNquestion
on8732INon
the8733DTthe
merits8734NNSmerit
.8735SENT.
Sorry8736RBsorry
.8737SENT.
Look8738NNlook
,8739,,
the8740DTthe
state8741NNstate
says8742VVZsay
Catholic8743JJCatholic
schools8744NNSschool
get8745VVPget
some8746DTsome
money8747NNmoney
;8748:;
Jewish8749JJJewish
schools8750NNSschool
do8751VVPdo
n't8752RBn't
.8753SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8754LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yeah8755NPYeah
.8756SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8757LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
All8758DTall
right8759NNright
?8760SENT?
No8761DTno
problem8762NNproblem
,8763,,
unconstitutional8764JJunconstitutional
,8765,,
free8766JJfree
exercise8767NNexercise
,8768,,
right8769RBright
?8770SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8771LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
And8772CCand
establishment8773NNestablishment
,8774,,
yes8775UHyes
.8776SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8777LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Okay8778NPOkay
.8779SENT.
The8780DTthe
...8781:...
the8782DTthe
state8783NNstate
says8784VVZsay
:8785::
We8786PPwe
'll8787MDwill
give8788VVgive
police8789NNpolice
protection8790NNprotection
to8791TOto
all8792DTall
schools8793NNSschool
,8794,,
all8795DTall
people8796NNSpeople
,8797,,
but8798CCbut
no8799DTno
religious8800JJreligious
institution8801NNinstitution
.8802SENT.
That's8803NNSThat's
...8804:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8805LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
That8806DTthat
...8807:...
that8808DTthat
...8809:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]8810LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...8811:...
unconstitutional8812JJunconstitutional
.8813SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8814LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
That8815DTthat
's8816VBZbe
Trinity8817NPTrinity
Lutheran8818NPLutheran
.8819SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8820LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Clearly8821RBclearly
.8822SENT.
Okay8823JJokay
.8824SENT.
Yeah8825UHYeah
.8826SENT.
Correct8827JJcorrect
.8828SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8829LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yeah8830NPYeah
.8831SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8832LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Now8833RBnow
,8834,,
why8835WRBwhy
is8836VBZbe
it8837PPit
different8838JJdifferent
?8839SENT?
And8840CCand
I8841PPI
'm8842VBPbe
not8843RBnot
saying8844VVGsay
it8845PPit
is8846VBZbe
n't8847RBn't
.8848SENT.
I8849PPI
want8850VVPwant
to8851TOto
know8852VVknow
your8853PP$your
reason8854NNreason
why8855WRBwhy
is8856VBZbe
it8857PPit
different8858JJdifferent
?8859SENT?
Oh8860UHoh
,8861,,
try8862VVtry
it8863PPit
the8864DTthe
opposite8865JJopposite
extreme8866NNextreme
.8867SENT.
The8868DTthe
state8869NNstate
says8870VVZsay
:8871::
We8872PPwe
will8873MDwill
pay8874VVpay
for8875INfor
the8876DTthe
salaries8877NNSsalary
of8878INof
priests8879NNSpriest
if8880INif
they8881PPthey
're8882VBPbe
Mohammedan8883JJMohammedan
but8884CCbut
not8885RBnot
if8886INif
they8887PPthey
're8888VBPbe
Buddhist8889NNBuddhist
.8890SENT.
Unconstitutional8891JJunconstitutional
,8892,,
right8893RBright
?8894SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8895LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yeah8896NPYeah
.8897SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8898LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Okay8899NPOkay
.8900SENT.
So8901RBso
why8902WRBwhy
does8903VVZdo
n't8904RBn't
it8905PPit
also8906RBalso
violate8907VVPviolate
the8908DTthe
Constitution8909NPConstitution
were8910VBDbe
the8911DTthe
state8912NNstate
to8913TOto
say8914VVsay
we8915PPwe
won8916MDwill
't8917RB't
pay8918VVpay
the8919DTthe
salaries8920NNSsalary
of8921INof
any8922DTany
priests8923NNSpriest
but8924CCbut
we8925PPwe
will8926MDwill
pay8927VVpay
the8928DTthe
head8929NNhead
of8930INof
every8931DTevery
other8932JJother
organization8933NNorganization
?8934SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8935LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Well8936UHwell
,8937,,
I8938PPI
think8939VVPthink
that8940DTthat
...8941:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]8942LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I8943PPI
mean8944VVPmean
,8945,,
you8946PPyou
see8947VVPsee
where8948WRBwhere
I'm8949NPI'm
...8950:...
you8951PPyou
see8952VVPsee
...8953:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8954LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yes8955NPYes
.8956SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8957LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...8958:...
how8959WRBhow
I8960PPI
'm8961VBPbe
doing8962VVGdo
that8963RBthat
?8964SENT?
You8965PPyou
see8966VVPsee
the8967DTthe
point8968NNpoint
?8969SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]8970LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So8971RBso
let8972VVDlet
me8973PPme
...8974:...
let8975VVlet
me8976PPme
answer8977VVanswer
that8978DTthat
question8979NNquestion
and8980CCand
then8981RBthen
go8982VVgo
back8983RBback
to8984TOto
the8985DTthe
race8986NNrace
question8987NNquestion
I8988PPI
would8989MDwould
like8990VVlike
to8991TOto
address8992VVaddress
.8993SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]8994LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Okay8995NPOkay
.8996SENT.
You8997PPyou
do8998VVPdo
n't8999RBn't
have9000VHhave
to9001TOto
answer9002VVanswer
if9003INif
you9004PPyou
do9005VVPdo
n't9006RBn't
want9007VVwant
to9008TOto
.9009SENT.
[9010SYM[
LAUGHTER9011NNlaughter
]9012SYM]
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9013LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Well9014UHWell
,9015,,
I'll9016NPI'll
...9017:...
I9018PPI
'll9019MDwill
give9020VVgive
a9021DTa
...9022:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9023LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I9024PPI
recommend9025VVPrecommend
it9026PPit
,9027,,
though9028RBthough
.9029SENT.
[9030SYM[
LAUGHTER9031NNlaughter
]9032SYM]
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9033LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I9034PPI
'll9035MDwill
give9036VVgive
a9037DTa
brief9038JJbrief
answer9039NNanswer
.9040SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9041LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah9042NPYeah
.9043SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9044LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So9045INso
I9046PPI
think9047VVPthink
that9048IN/thatthat
there9049EXthere
's9050VBZbe
a9051DTa
constitutional9052JJconstitutional
difference9053NNdifference
between9054INbetween
distinguishing9055VVGdistinguish
among9056INamong
religions9057NNSreligion
and9058CCand
saying9059VVGsay
the9060DTthe
Court9061NNcourt
is9062VBZbe
...9063:...
the9064DTthe
government9065NNgovernment
is9066VBZbe
just9067RBjust
going9068VVGgo
to9069TOto
stay9070VVstay
out9071RPout
of9072INof
religion9073NNreligion
altogether9074RBaltogether
.9075SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9076LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
That9077DTthat
's9078VBZbe
correct9079JJcorrect
.9080SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9081LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
There9082RBthere
's9083POS's
many9084JJmany
Establishment9085NNestablishment
Clause9086NNclause
cases9087NNScase
saying9088VVGsay
that9089IN/thatthat
regardless9090RBregardless
of9091INof
whether9092INwhether
there9093EXthere
's9094VBZbe
a9095DTa
civil9096JJcivil
liberties9097NNSliberty
violation9098NNviolation
,9099,,
it9100PPit
's9101VBZbe
just9102RBjust
contrary9103JJcontrary
to9104TOto
...9105:...
to9106TOto
disestablishment9107NNdisestablishment
principles9108NNSprinciple
to9109TOto
say9110VVsay
that9111IN/thatthat
we9112PPwe
're9113VBPbe
going9114VVGgo
to9115TOto
treat9116VVtreat
one9117CDone
religion9118NNreligion
...9119:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9120LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Okay9121NPOkay
,9122,,
I9123PPI
got9124VVDget
that9125RBthat
.9126SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9127LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
...9128:...
totally9129RBtotally
different9130JJdifferent
from9131INfrom
another9132DTanother
one9133CDone
.9134SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9135LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
So9136INso
what9137WPwhat
about9138INabout
the9139DTthe
other9140JJother
part9141NNpart
,9142,,
where9143WRBwhere
we9144PPwe
said9145VVDsay
,9146,,
look9147VVPlook
,9148,,
you9149PPyou
can9150MDcan
't9151RB't
discriminate9152JJdiscriminate
against9153INagainst
all9154DTall
religions9155NNSreligion
by9156INby
not9157RBnot
giving9158VVGgive
them9159PPthem
playgrounds9160NNSplayground
or9161CCor
you9162PPyou
can9163MDcan
't9164RB't
discriminate9165JJdiscriminate
against9166INagainst
all9167DTall
religions9168NNSreligion
by9169INby
refusing9170VVGrefuse
to9171TOto
give9172VVgive
them9173PPthem
police9174VVpolice
protection9175NNprotection
or9176CCor
fire9177NNfire
protection9178NNprotection
?9179SENT?
What9180WPWhat
about9181INabout
that9182DTthat
part9183NNpart
?9184SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9185LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
All9186DTall
right9187NNright
.9188SENT.
So9189RBso
there9190RBthere
...9191:...
there9192EXthere
's9193VBZbe
two9194CDtwo
differences9195NNSdifference
between9196INbetween
that9197DTthat
case9198NNcase
and9199CCand
this9200DTthis
one9201CDone
.9202SENT.
One9203PPone
is9204VBZbe
the9205DTthe
striking9206VVGstrike
down9207RPdown
of9208INof
the9209DTthe
whole9210JJwhole
program9211NNprogram
,9212,,
which9213WDTwhich
we9214PPwe
've9215VHPhave
talked9216VVNtalk
about9217RBabout
throughout9218INthroughout
the9219DTthe
argument9220NNargument
today9221NNtoday
,9222,,
and9223CCand
then9224RBthen
there9225EXthere
's9226VBZbe
a9227DTa
second9228JJsecond
point9229NNpoint
which9230WDTwhich
has9231VHZhave
n't9232RBn't
really9233RBreally
come9234VVcome
up9235RPup
,9236,,
which9237WDTwhich
is9238VBZbe
sort9239NNsort
of9240INof
the9241DTthe
Locke9242NPLocke
v9243NNv
.9244SENT.
Davey9245NPDavey
distinction9246NNdistinction
between9247INbetween
a9248DTa
declination9249NNdeclination
to9250TOto
fund9251VVfund
religious9252JJreligious
education9253NNeducation
and9254CCand
refusing9255VVGrefuse
funding9256NNfunding
merely9257RBmerely
because9258INbecause
someone9259NNsomeone
happens9260VVZhappen
to9261TOto
be9262VBbe
religious9263JJreligious
for9264INfor
a9265DTa
completely9266RBcompletely
non-religious9267JJnon-religious
purpose9268NNpurpose
.9269SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9270LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Does9271VVZdo
...9272:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9273LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
And9274CCand
I9275PPI
think9276VVPthink
that9277DTthat
...9278:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9279LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Does9280VVZdo
...9281:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]9282LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Can9283MDcan
I9284PPI
take9285VVtake
you9286PPyou
back9287RBback
,9288,,
Mr9289NPMr
.9290SENT.
Unikowsky9291NPUnikowsky
,9292,,
to9293TOto
the9294DTthe
striking9295VVGstrike
down9296RPdown
the9297DTthe
whole9298JJwhole
program9299NNprogram
?9300SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9301LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yes9302NPYes
.9303SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]9304LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Because9305INbecause
a9306DTa
number9307NNnumber
of9308INof
people9309NNSpeople
have9310VHPhave
suggested9311VVNsuggest
that9312IN/thatthat
that9313WDTthat
must9314MDmust
be9315VBbe
motivated9316VVNmotivate
by9317INby
animus9318NNanimus
towards9319INtowards
religion9320NNreligion
.9321SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9322LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Right9323NPRight
.9324SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]9325LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
And9326CCand
I9327PPI
can9328MDcan
think9329VVthink
of9330INof
many9331JJmany
reasons9332NNSreason
why9333WRBwhy
you9334PPyou
would9335MDwould
strike9336VVstrike
down9337RPdown
the9338DTthe
whole9339JJwhole
program9340NNprogram
that9341WDTthat
have9342VHPhave
nothing9343NNnothing
to9344TOto
do9345VVdo
with9346INwith
animus9347NNanimus
toward9348INtoward
religion9349NNreligion
.9350SENT.
You9351PPyou
might9352MDmight
actually9353RBactually
think9354VVthink
that9355DTthat
funding9356NNfunding
religion9357NNreligion
imposes9358VVZimpose
costs9359NNScost
and9360CCand
burdens9361NNSburden
on9362INon
religious9363JJreligious
institutions9364NNSinstitution
themselves9365PPthemselves
.9366SENT.
You9367PPyou
might9368MDmight
think9369VVthink
that9370IN/thatthat
taxpayers9371NNStaxpayer
have9372VHPhave
conscientious9373JJconscientious
objections9374NNSobjection
to9375TOto
funding9376NNfunding
religion9377NNreligion
.9378SENT.
You9379PPyou
might9380MDmight
think9381VVthink
that9382DTthat
funding9383NNfunding
religion9384NNreligion
creates9385VVZcreate
divisiveness9386NNdivisiveness
and9387CCand
conflict9388NNconflict
within9389INwithin
a9390DTa
society9391NNsociety
,9392,,
and9393CCand
that9394IN/thatthat
for9395INfor
all9396PDTall
those9397DTthose
reasons9398NNSreason
,9399,,
funding9400VVGfund
religious9401JJreligious
activity9402NNactivity
is9403VBZbe
not9404RBnot
a9405DTa
good9406JJgood
idea9407NNidea
and9408CCand
that9409IN/thatthat
you9410PPyou
would9411MDwould
rather9412RBrather
level9413VVlevel
down9414RPdown
and9415CCand
fund9416VVfund
no9417DTno
comparable9418JJcomparable
activity9419NNactivity
,9420,,
whether9421INwhether
religious9422JJreligious
or9423CCor
otherwise9424RBotherwise
,9425,,
than9426INthan
fund9427NNfund
both9428DTboth
.9429SENT.
Now9430RBnow
,9431,,
none9432NNnone
of9433INof
those9434DTthose
things9435NNSthing
have9436VHPhave
anything9437NNanything
to9438TOto
do9439VVdo
with9440INwith
animus9441NNanimus
towards9442INtowards
religion9443NNreligion
,9444,,
and9445CCand
219446CD@card@
I9447PPI
...9448:...
I9449PPI
...9450:...
I9451PPI
...9452:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9453LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So9454INso
I9455PPI
think9456VVPthink
that9457WDTthat
's9458VBZbe
right9459JJright
,9460,,
and9461CCand
I9462PPI
think9463VVPthink
that9464DTthat
's9465VBZbe
why9466WRBwhy
we9467PPwe
do9468VVPdo
n't9469RBn't
think9470VVthink
the9471DTthe
race9472NNrace
analogy9473NNanalogy
is9474VBZbe
apt9475JJapt
.9476SENT.
And9477CCand
I9478PPI
think9479VVPthink
it9480PPit
's9481VBZbe
useful9482JJuseful
to9483TOto
talk9484VVtalk
about9485RBabout
why9486WRBwhy
the9487DTthe
no-aid9488NNno-aid
clause9489NNclause
was9490VBDbe
enacted9491VVNenact
based9492VVNbase
on9493INon
the9494DTthe
convention9495NNconvention
's9496POS's
discussions9497NNSdiscussion
in9498INin
19729499CD@card@
and9500CCand
why9501WRBwhy
it9502PPit
makes9503VVZmake
sense9504NNsense
that9505IN/thatthat
those9506DTthose
justifications9507NNSjustification
would9508MDwould
result9509VVresult
in9510INin
...9511:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9512LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Why9513WRBwhy
...9514:...
why9515WRBwhy
does9516VVZdo
that9517RBthat
explain9518VVexplain
why9519WRBwhy
the9520DTthe
race9521NNrace
analogy9522NNanalogy
is9523VBZbe
inapt9524JJinapt
?9525SENT?
I9526PPI
mean9527VVPmean
,9528,,
the9529DTthe
legislature9530NNlegislature
may9531MDmay
say9532VVsay
they9533PPthey
built9534VVNbuild
parks9535NNSpark
and9536CCand
pools9537NNSpool
,9538,,
and9539CCand
they9540PPthey
say9541VVPsay
funding9542VVGfund
those9543DTthose
,9544,,
but9545CCbut
if9546INif
a9547DTa
higher9548JJRhigh
percentage9549NNpercentage
of9550INof
African9551JJAfrican
Americans9552NPSAmericans
come9553VVPcome
and9554CCand
use9555VVPuse
the9556DTthe
pools9557NNSpool
,9558,,
then9559RBthen
we9560PPwe
're9561VBPbe
going9562VVGgo
to9563TOto
shut9564VVshut
down9565RPdown
the9566DTthe
whole9567JJwhole
program9568NNprogram
.9569SENT.
And9570CCand
you9571PPyou
would9572MDwould
n't9573RBn't
defend9574VVdefend
that9575IN/thatthat
on9576INon
saying9577VVGsay
they9578PPthey
could9579MDcould
have9580VHhave
a9581DTa
judgment9582NNjudgment
that9583IN/thatthat
it9584PPit
decreases9585VVZdecrease
tensions9586NNStension
among9587INamong
the9588DTthe
different9589JJdifferent
races9590NNSrace
to9591TOto
keep9592VVkeep
them9593PPthem
...9594:...
no9595UHno
,9596,,
you9597PPyou
would9598MDwould
just9599RBjust
look9600VVlook
at9601INat
the9602DTthe
facial9603JJfacial
discrimination9604NNdiscrimination
,9605,,
right9606RBright
,9607,,
and9608CCand
conclude9609VVconclude
the9610DTthe
fact9611NNfact
that9612WDTthat
...9613:...
that9614WDTthat
would9615MDwould
n't9616RBn't
be9617VBbe
good9618JJgood
under9619INunder
your9620PP$your
view9621NNview
,9622,,
would9623MDwould
it9624PPit
?9625SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9626LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Of9627INof
course9628NNcourse
not9629RBnot
...9630:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9631LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Because9632INbecause
they9633PPthey
're9634VBPbe
shutting9635VVGshut
down9636RPdown
the9637DTthe
whole9638NNwhole
...9639:...
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9640LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No9641NPNo
.9642SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9643LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
...9644:...
program9645NNprogram
?9646SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9647LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No9648NPNo
.9649SENT.
Of9650INof
course9651NNcourse
not9652RBnot
.9653SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9654LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
How9655WRBHow
is9656VBZbe
that9657IN/thatthat
different9658JJdifferent
than9659INthan
religion9660NNreligion
,9661,,
which9662WDTwhich
is9663VBZbe
also9664RBalso
protected9665VVNprotect
under9666INunder
...9667:...
under9668INunder
the9669DTthe
First9670NPFirst
Amendment9671NPAmendment
?9672SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9673LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Because9674INbecause
I9675PPI
do9676VVPdo
n't9677RBn't
think9678VVthink
that9679DTthat
race9680NNrace
and9681CCand
religion9682NNreligion
are9683VBPbe
identical9684JJidentical
for9685INfor
all9686DTall
constitutional9687JJconstitutional
purposes9688NNSpurpose
,9689,,
right9690RBright
?9691SENT?
Look9692NNlook
...9693:...
look9694VVlook
,9695,,
if9696INif
a9697DTa
state9698NNstate
constitution9699NNconstitution
had9700VHDhave
a9701DTa
provision9702NNprovision
saying9703VVGsay
that9704IN/thatthat
like9705INlike
historically9706RBhistorically
black9707JJblack
colleges9708NNScollege
are9709VBPbe
n't9710RBn't
entitled9711VVNentitle
to9712TOto
any9713DTany
aid9714NNaid
at9715INat
all9716DTall
,9717,,
that9718WDTthat
would9719MDwould
obviously9720RBobviously
be9721VBbe
facially9722RBfacially
unconstitutional9723JJunconstitutional
.9724SENT.
You9725PPyou
would9726MDwould
n't9727RBn't
even9728RBeven
need9729VVPneed
to9730TOto
get9731VVget
to9732TOto
these9733DTthese
as-applied9734JJas-applied
challenges9735NNSchallenge
at9736INat
all9737DTall
because9738INbecause
I9739PPI
think9740VVPthink
the9741DTthe
equal-protection9742NNequal-protection
clause9743NNclause
embodies9744VVZembody
a9745DTa
judgment9746NNjudgment
that9747IN/thatthat
race9748NNrace
is9749VBZbe
never9750RBnever
,9751,,
ever9752RBever
a9753DTa
permissible9754JJpermissible
criterion9755NNcriterion
in9756INin
any9757DTany
government9758NNgovernment
decision9759NNdecision
making9760VVGmake
at9761INat
all9762DTall
,9763,,
regardless9764RBregardless
...9765:...
unless9766INunless
strict9767JJstrict
scrutiny9768NNscrutiny
is9769VBZbe
satisfied9770VVNsatisfy
,9771,,
which9772WDTwhich
is9773VBZbe
very9774RBvery
,9775,,
very9776RBvery
difficult9777JJdifficult
.9778SENT.
And9779CCand
...9780:...
and9781CCand
I9782PPI
do9783VVPdo
n't9784RBn't
think9785VVthink
the9786DTthe
rule9787NNrule
is9788VBZbe
the9789DTthe
same9790JJsame
in9791INin
religion9792NNreligion
.9793SENT.
But9794CCbut
later9795RBRlater
this9796DTthis
term9797NNterm
,9798,,
this9799DTthis
Court9800NPCourt
's9801VBZbe
about9802RBabout
to9803TOto
hear9804VVhear
a9805DTa
case9806NNcase
involving9807VVGinvolve
exemptions9808NNSexemption
of9809INof
religious9810JJreligious
schools9811NNSschool
from9812INfrom
anti-9813NNanti-
discrimination9814NNdiscrimination
laws9815NNSlaw
.9816SENT.
That9817DTthat
distinguishes9818VVZdistinguish
between9819INbetween
...9820:...
that9821DTthat
...9822:...
that9823WDTthat
creates9824VVZcreate
a9825DTa
sort9826NNsort
of9827INof
religious9828JJreligious
classification9829NNclassification
but9830CCbut
that9831DTthat
does9832VVZdo
...9833:...
that9834WDTthat
's9835VBZbe
not9836RBnot
intrinsically9837RBintrinsically
unconstitutional9838JJunconstitutional
.9839SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9840LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Was9841VBDbe
that9842DTthat
...9843:...
was9844VBDbe
that9845IN/thatthat
your9846PP$your
answer9847NNanswer
to9848TOto
Justice9849NPJustice
Kagan9850NPKagan
's9851POS's
question9852NNquestion
?9853SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9854LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
No9855NPNo
,9856,,
so9857RBso
...9858:...
well9859RBwell
...9860:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9861LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well9862UHWell
,9863,,
I9864PPI
...9865:...
go9866VVPgo
ahead9867RBahead
.9868SENT.
I9869PPI
'd9870MDwould
like9871VVlike
to9872TOto
give9873VVgive
you9874PPyou
the9875DTthe
chance9876NNchance
to9877TOto
do9878VVdo
that9879DTthat
.9880SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]9881LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
The9882DTthe
answer9883NNanswer
is9884VBZbe
,9885,,
I9886PPI
think9887VVPthink
if9888INif
you9889PPyou
accept9890VVPaccept
that9891IN/thatthat
no-aid9892NNno-aid
clauses9893NNSclause
are9894VBPbe
not9895RBnot
facially9896RBfacially
unconstitutional9897JJunconstitutional
,9898,,
and9899CCand
I9900PPI
think9901VVPthink
it9902PPit
's9903VBZbe
a9904DTa
hard9905JJhard
argument9906NNargument
to9907TOto
make9908VVmake
for9909INfor
all9910PDTall
the9911DTthe
historical9912JJhistorical
reasons9913NNSreason
,9914,,
they9915PPthey
've9916VHPhave
existed9917VVNexist
for9918INfor
such9919PDTsuch
a9920DTa
long9921JJlong
time9922NNtime
,9923,,
then9924RBthen
you9925PPyou
have9926VHPhave
to9927TOto
accept9928VVaccept
that9929IN/thatthat
it9930PPit
's9931VBZbe
at9932INat
least9933JJSleast
permissible9934JJpermissible
for9935INfor
a9936DTa
state9937NNstate
to9938TOto
say9939VVsay
,9940,,
for9941INfor
principled9942JJprincipled
reasons9943NNSreason
deeply9944RBdeeply
rooted9945VVNroot
in9946INin
national9947JJnational
tradition9948NNtradition
dating9949VVGdate
back9950RBback
to9951TOto
Madison9952NPMadison
,9953,,
we9954PPwe
have9955VHPhave
a9956DTa
preference9957NNpreference
to9958TOto
not9959RBnot
fund9960VVfund
religious9961JJreligious
activities9962NNSactivity
,9963,,
not9964RBnot
prohibit9965VVprohibit
it9966PPit
but9967CCbut
not9968RBnot
fund9969VVfund
it9970PPit
.9971SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]9972LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
But9973CCbut
there9974EXthere
's9975VBZbe
a9976DTa
difference9977NNdifference
between9978INbetween
saying9979VVGsay
we9980PPwe
're9981VBPbe
not9982RBnot
going9983VVGgo
to9984TOto
fund9985VVfund
religious9986JJreligious
activities9987NNSactivity
and9988CCand
saying9989VVGsay
we9990PPwe
're9991VBPbe
going9992VVGgo
to9993TOto
discriminate9994VVdiscriminate
based9995VVNbase
on9996INon
religion9997NNreligion
.9998SENT.
That9999DTthat
's10000VBZbe
the10001DTthe
point10002NNpoint
.10003SENT.
They10004PPthey
...10005:...
the10006DTthe
state10007NNstate
...10008:...
nobody10009NNnobody
's10010VBZbe
claiming10011VVGclaim
the10012DTthe
state10013NNstate
has10014VHZhave
an10015DTan
obligation10016NNobligation
to10017TOto
make10018VVmake
particular10019JJparticular
grants10020NNSgrant
to10021TOto
religious10022JJreligious
institutions10023NNSinstitution
or10024CCor
to10025TOto
provide10026VVprovide
any10027DTany
funding10028NNfunding
for10029INfor
private10030JJprivate
education10031NNeducation
at10032INat
all10033DTall
.10034SENT.
The10035DTthe
question10036NNquestion
is10037VBZbe
,10038,,
can10039MDcan
they10040PPthey
...10041:...
if10042INif
...10043:...
if10044INif
...10045:...
if10046INif
there10047EXthere
is10048VBZbe
a10049DTa
program10050NNprogram
that10051WDTthat
is10052VBZbe
...10053:...
that10054WDTthat
's10055VBZbe
...10056:...
is10057VBZbe
designed10058VVNdesign
to10059TOto
serve10060VVserve
certain10061JJcertain
purposes10062NNSpurpose
,10063,,
can10064MDcan
they10065PPthey
discriminate10066VVdiscriminate
in10067INin
the10068DTthe
application10069NNapplication
of10070INof
the10071DTthe
...10072:...
in10073INin
the10074DTthe
...10075:...
in10076INin
the10077DTthe
...10078:...
deciding10079VVGdecide
who10080WPwho
's10081VBZbe
going10082VVGgo
to10083TOto
get10084VVget
the10085DTthe
benefit10086NNbenefit
of10087INof
it10088PPit
on10089INon
the10090DTthe
basis10091NNbasis
of10092INof
religious10093JJreligious
affiliation10094NNaffiliation
?10095SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]10096LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I10097PPI
think10098VVPthink
what10099WPwhat
...10100:...
so10101INso
that10102WDTthat
sounds10103VVZsound
more10104JJRmore
like10105INlike
the10106DTthe
Trinity10107NPTrinity
Lutheran10108NPLutheran
hypothetical10109JJhypothetical
.10110SENT.
I10111PPI
think10112VVPthink
what10113WPwhat
state10114NNstate
...10115:...
there10116EXthere
are10117VBPbe
certain10118JJcertain
things10119NNSthing
a10120DTa
state10121NNstate
can10122MDcan
't10123RB't
do10124VVdo
and10125CCand
certain10126JJcertain
things10127NNSthing
a10128DTa
state10129NNstate
can10130MDcan
do10131VVdo
.10132SENT.
What10133WPWhat
I10134PPI
think10135VVPthink
a10136DTa
state10137NNstate
can10138MDcan
do10139VVdo
is10140VBZbe
say10141VVsay
,10142,,
look10143VVlook
,10144,,
we10145PPwe
have10146VHPhave
a10147DTa
no-aid10148NNno-aid
clause10149NNclause
which10150WDTwhich
has10151VHZhave
existed10152VVNexist
for10153INfor
a10154DTa
very10155RBvery
long10156JJlong
time10157NNtime
and10158CCand
that10159WDTthat
says10160VVZsay
on10161INon
its10162PP$its
face10163NNface
that10164IN/thatthat
we10165PPwe
prefer10166VVPprefer
not10167RBnot
to10168TOto
fund10169VVfund
religious10170JJreligious
activities10171NNSactivity
for10172INfor
good10173JJgood
reasons10174NNSreason
I10175PPI
'd10176MDwould
like10177VVlike
to10178TOto
explain10179VVexplain
in10180INin
just10181RBjust
a10182DTa
second10183JJsecond
,10184,,
okay10185JJokay
?10186SENT?
Now10187RBnow
,10188,,
we10189PPwe
're10190VBPbe
constrained10191VVNconstrain
by10192INby
anti-discrimination10193JJanti-discrimination
principles10194NNSprinciple
from10195INfrom
coercing10196VVGcoerce
people10197NNSpeople
into10198INinto
abandoning10199VVGabandon
their10200PP$their
religion10201NNreligion
.10202SENT.
So10203RBso
if10204INif
we10205PPwe
have10206VHPhave
these10207DTthese
two10208CDtwo
principles10209NNSprinciple
,10210,,
these10211DTthese
principled10212JJprincipled
non-bigoted10213JJnon-bigoted
and10214CCand
historically10215RBhistorically
rooted10216VVNroot
views10217NNSview
that10218IN/thatthat
we10219PPwe
do10220VVPdo
n't10221RBn't
want10222VVwant
to10223TOto
fund10224VVfund
religious10225JJreligious
activity10226NNactivity
on10227INon
the10228DTthe
one10229CDone
hand10230NNhand
,10231,,
and10232CCand
the10233DTthe
First10234NPFirst
Amendment10235NPAmendment
,10236,,
which10237WDTwhich
clearly10238RBclearly
guards10239VVZguard
against10240INagainst
coercion10241NNcoercion
and10242CCand
penalizing10243VVGpenalize
religious10244JJreligious
faith10245NNfaith
on10246INon
the10247DTthe
other10248JJother
,10249,,
the10250DTthe
way10251NNway
we10252PPwe
're10253VBPbe
going10254VVGgo
to10255TOto
balance10256VVbalance
it10257PPit
is10258VBZbe
to10259TOto
do10260VVdo
what10261WPwhat
the10262DTthe
state10263NNstate
court10264NNcourt
did10265VVDdo
.10266SENT.
And10267CCand
I10268PPI
just10269RBjust
want10270VVPwant
to10271TOto
say10272VVsay
one10273CDone
thing10274NNthing
about10275INabout
that10276DTthat
.10277SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10278LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
To10279TOTo
do10280VVdo
what10281WPwhat
the10282DTthe
state10283NNstate
court10284NNcourt
did10285VVDdo
,10286,,
meaning10287VVGmean
?10288SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]10289LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yes10290NPYes
,10291,,
invalidate10292VVPinvalidate
the10293DTthe
program10294NNprogram
.10295SENT.
And10296CCand
I10297PPI
just10298RBjust
...10299:...
I10300PPI
mean10301VVPmean
,10302,,
if10303INif
you10304PPyou
look10305VVPlook
at10306INat
the10307DTthe
reasons10308NNSreason
the10309DTthe
no-aid10310NNno-aid
clause10311NNclause
was10312VBDbe
enacted10313VVNenact
which10314WDTwhich
I10315PPI
think10316VVPthink
are10317VBPbe
similar10318JJsimilar
to10319TOto
the10320DTthe
reasons10321NNSreason
James10322NPJames
Madison10323NPMadison
gave10324VVDgive
,10325,,
it10326PPit
's10327VBZbe
just10328RBjust
hard10329JJhard
to10330TOto
say10331VVsay
that10332IN/thatthat
James10333NPJames
Madison10334NPMadison
disabled10335VVDdisable
future10336JJfuture
states10337NNSstate
from10338INfrom
enacting10339VVGenact
no-aid10340NNno-aid
clauses10341NNSclause
based10342VVNbase
on10343INon
essentially10344RBessentially
similar10345JJsimilar
arguments10346NNSargument
to10347TOto
the10348DTthe
ones10349NNSone
he10350PPhe
made10351VVDmake
.10352SENT.
And10353CCand
in10354INin
197210355CD@card@
,10356,,
what10357WPwhat
the10358DTthe
delegates10359NNSdelegate
basically10360RBbasically
said10361VVDsay
was10362VBDbe
that10363IN/thatthat
they10364PPthey
conceived10365VVDconceive
of10366INof
the10367DTthe
no-aid10368NNno-aid
clause10369NNclause
as10370INas
a10371DTa
mechanism10372NNmechanism
of10373INof
protecting10374VVGprotect
religious10375JJreligious
schools10376NNSschool
from10377INfrom
political10378JJpolitical
influence10379NNinfluence
.10380SENT.
So10381RBso
,10382,,
to10383TOto
prevent10384VVprevent
government10385NNgovernment
from10386INfrom
using10387VVGuse
its10388PP$its
leverage10389NNleverage
to10390TOto
...10391:...
to10392TOto
influence10393VVinfluence
the10394DTthe
content10395NNcontent
of10396INof
religious10397JJreligious
education10398NNeducation
.10399SENT.
There10400EXthere
's10401VBZbe
like10402INlike
a10403DTa
lot10404NNlot
of10405INof
leaders10406NNSleader
of10407INof
religious10408JJreligious
denominations10409NNSdenomination
who10410WPwho
came10411VVDcome
forward10412RBforward
and10413CCand
testified10414VVDtestify
in10415INin
favor10416NNfavor
of10417INof
the10418DTthe
no-aid10419NNno-aid
clause10420NNclause
for10421INfor
that10422DTthat
exact10423JJexact
reason10424NNreason
.10425SENT.
And10426CCand
I10427PPI
think10428VVPthink
it10429PPit
's10430VBZbe
very10431RBvery
clear10432JJclear
why10433WRBwhy
that10434DTthat
justification10435NNjustification
applies10436VVZapply
with10437INwith
complete10438JJcomplete
force10439NNforce
with10440INwith
respect10441NNrespect
to10442TOto
this10443DTthis
program10444NNprogram
,10445,,
right10446RBright
?10447SENT?
Because10448INbecause
it10449PPit
's10450VBZbe
...10451:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]10452LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Basically10453RBbasically
what10454WPwhat
you10455PPyou
're10456VBPbe
saying10457VVGsay
is10458VBZbe
,10459,,
the10460DTthe
difference10461NNdifference
between10462INbetween
this10463DTthis
and10464CCand
race10465NNrace
is10466VBZbe
,10467,,
it10468PPit
's10469VBZbe
permissible10470JJpermissible
to10471TOto
discriminate10472VVdiscriminate
on10473INon
the10474DTthe
basis10475NNbasis
of10476INof
religion10477NNreligion
.10478SENT.
It10479PPit
's10480VBZbe
not10481RBnot
permissible10482JJpermissible
,10483,,
ever10484RBever
,10485,,
to10486TOto
discriminate10487VVdiscriminate
on10488INon
the10489DTthe
basis10490NNbasis
of10491INof
...10492:...
of10493INof
race10494NNrace
.10495SENT.
That10496DTthat
's10497VBZbe
what10498WPwhat
you10499PPyou
're10500VBPbe
saying10501VVGsay
.10502SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]10503LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I10504PPI
mean10505VVPmean
,10506,,
look10507VVPlook
,10508,,
it10509PPit
...10510:...
it10511PPit
seems10512VVZseem
to10513TOto
me10514PPme
that10515IN/thatthat
when10516WRBwhen
you10517PPyou
talk10518VVPtalk
about10519INabout
discrimination10520NNdiscrimination
,10521,,
we10522PPwe
can10523MDcan
mean10524VVmean
two10525CDtwo
different10526JJdifferent
things10527NNSthing
,10528,,
all10529DTall
right10530NNright
?10531SENT?
One10532CDOne
way10533NNway
of10534INof
looking10535VVGlook
at10536INat
discrimination10537NNdiscrimination
is10538VBZbe
to10539TOto
say10540VVsay
that10541IN/thatthat
just10542RBjust
...10543:...
you10544PPyou
can10545MDcan
't10546RB't
have10547VHhave
a10548DTa
rule10549NNrule
that10550WDTthat
treats10551VVZtreat
religion10552NNreligion
differently10553RBdifferently
from10554INfrom
other10555JJother
subjects10556NNSsubject
,10557,,
which10558WDTwhich
is10559VBZbe
I10560PPI
think10561VVPthink
is10562VBZbe
the10563DTthe
core10564NNcore
of10565INof
Petitioners10566NNSpetitioner
'10567POS'
argument10568NNargument
.10569SENT.
And10570CCand
they10571PPthey
say10572VVPsay
,10573,,
look10574VVPlook
at10575INat
the10576DTthe
no-aid10577NNno-aid
clause10578NNclause
.10579SENT.
It10580PPit
says10581VVZsay
religious10582JJreligious
schools10583NNSschool
are10584VBPbe
ineligible10585JJineligible
and10586CCand
it10587PPit
imposes10588VVZimpose
no10589DTno
comparable10590JJcomparable
restriction10591NNrestriction
on10592INon
anyone10593NNanyone
else10594RBelse
,10595,,
and10596CCand
therefore10597RBtherefore
that10598WDTthat
's10599VBZbe
just10600RBjust
discrimination10601NNdiscrimination
and10602CCand
it10603PPit
should10604MDshould
be10605VBbe
wiped10606VVNwipe
out10607RPout
of10608INof
the10609DTthe
state10610NNstate
constitution10611NNconstitution
.10612SENT.
So10613RBso
if10614INif
...10615:...
if10616INif
...10617:...
if10618INif
you10619PPyou
buy10620VVPbuy
that10621DTthat
argument10622NNargument
,10623,,
then10624RBthen
you10625PPyou
're10626VBPbe
basically10627RBbasically
saying10628VVGsay
that10629IN/thatthat
like10630INlike
every10631DTevery
no-aid10632NNno-aid
clause10633NNclause
since10634INsince
183510635CD@card@
is10636VBZbe
unconstitutional10637JJunconstitutional
,10638,,
even10639RBeven
at10640INat
the10641DTthe
founding10642NNfounding
.10643SENT.
Look10644NNlook
,10645,,
all10646PDTall
the10647DTthe
state10648NNstate
constitutions10649NNSconstitution
said10650VVDsay
things10651NNSthing
like10652INlike
,10653,,
a10654DTa
tax10655NNtax
won10656MDwill
't10657RB't
be10658VBbe
levied10659VVNlevy
to10660TOto
build10661VVbuild
a10662DTa
church10663NNchurch
.10664SENT.
That10665DTthat
is10666VBZbe
a10667DTa
form10668NNform
of10669INof
discrimination10670NNdiscrimination
,10671,,
right10672RBright
?10673SENT?
Like10674INlike
you10675PPyou
can10676MDcan
levy10677VVlevy
a10678DTa
tax10679NNtax
to10680TOto
build10681VVbuild
a10682DTa
bridge10683NNbridge
but10684CCbut
not10685RBnot
a10686DTa
church10687NNchurch
.10688SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]10689LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well10690UHWell
,10691,,
I10692PPI
...10693:...
I10694PPI
mean10695VVPmean
,10696,,
I10697PPI
do10698VVPdo
n't10699RBn't
know10700VVknow
about10701INabout
every10702DTevery
...10703:...
every10704DTevery
no-aid10705NNno-aid
clause10706NNclause
in10707INin
the10708DTthe
country10709NNcountry
.10710SENT.
They10711PPthey
'd10712MDwould
all10713RBall
have10714VHhave
to10715TOto
be10716VBbe
examined10717VVNexamine
separately10718RBseparately
if10719INif
in10720INin
...10721:...
if10722INif
,10723,,
in10724INin
fact10725NNfact
,10726,,
they10727PPthey
are10728VBPbe
challenged10729VVNchallenge
.10730SENT.
A10731DTa
lot10732NNlot
of10733INof
them10734PPthem
...10735:...
look10736VVlook
,10737,,
you10738PPyou
...10739:...
I10740PPI
'm10741VBPbe
not10742RBnot
going10743VVGgo
to10744TOto
get10745VVget
into10746INinto
an10747DTan
argument10748NNargument
with10749INwith
you10750PPyou
about10751INabout
what10752WPwhat
happened10753VVDhappen
in10754INin
197210755CD@card@
,10756,,
but10757CCbut
do10758VVPdo
you10759PPyou
really10760RBreally
want10761VVPwant
to10762TOto
argue10763VVargue
that10764IN/thatthat
the10765DTthe
reason10766NNreason
why10767WRBwhy
a10768DTa
lot10769NNlot
of10770INof
this10771DTthis
popped10772VVNpop
up10773RPup
beginning10774NNbeginning
,10775,,
coincidentally10776RBcoincidentally
,10777,,
in10778INin
the10779DTthe
1840s10780JJ1840s
,10781,,
at10782INat
the10783DTthe
time10784NNtime
of10785INof
the10786DTthe
Irish10787JJIrish
potato10788NNpotato
famine10789NNfamine
,10790,,
that10791WDTthat
had10792VHDhave
nothing10793NNnothing
to10794TOto
do10795VVdo
with10796INwith
discrimination10797NNdiscrimination
based10798VVNbase
on10799INon
religion10800NNreligion
?10801SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]10802LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I10803PPI
'm10804VBPbe
not10805RBnot
saying10806VVGsay
that10807IN/thatthat
they10808PPthey
...10809:...
no10810UHno
,10811,,
I10812PPI
'm10813VBPbe
not10814RBnot
saying10815VVGsay
that10816IN/thatthat
at10817INat
all10818DTall
.10819SENT.
I10820PPI
think10821VVPthink
that10822IN/thatthat
the10823DTthe
history10824NNhistory
in10825INin
the10826DTthe
19th10827JJ19th
century10828NNcentury
is10829VBZbe
very10830RBvery
complex10831JJcomplex
,10832,,
like10833INlike
there10834EXthere
's10835VBZbe
a10836DTa
Professor10837NPProfessor
Green10838NPGreen
,10839,,
who10840WPwho
is10841VBZbe
a10842DTa
leading10843VVGlead
scholar10844NNscholar
on10845INon
this10846DTthis
,10847,,
wrote10848VVDwrite
a10849DTa
book10850NNbook
that10851IN/thatthat
both10852DTboth
parties10853NNSparty
cite10854VVcite
which10855WDTwhich
basically10856RBbasically
says10857VVZsay
it10858PPit
's10859VBZbe
a10860DTa
complex10861JJcomplex
history10862NNhistory
and10863CCand
there10864EXthere
's10865VBZbe
good10866JJgood
reasons10867VVZreason
and10868CCand
there10869EXthere
's10870VBZbe
bad10871JJbad
reasons10872NNSreason
and10873CCand
it10874PPit
depends10875VVZdepend
on10876INon
the10877DTthe
state10878NNstate
.10879SENT.
And10880CCand
,10881,,
look10882VVPlook
,10883,,
I10884PPI
...10885:...
I10886PPI
do10887VVPdo
n't10888RBn't
see10889VVsee
how10890WRBhow
Montana10891NPMontana
could10892MDcould
...10893:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]10894LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But10895CCbut
are10896VBPbe
n't10897RBn't
you10898PPyou
saying10899VVGsay
...10900:...
are10901VBPbe
you10902PPyou
...10903:...
I10904PPI
do10905VVPdo
n't10906RBn't
know10907VVknow
,10908,,
can10909MDcan
we10910PPwe
...10911:...
can10912MDcan
you10913PPyou
or10914CCor
could10915MDcould
I10916PPI
say10917VVsay
this10918DTthis
:10919::
Yes10920UHyes
,10921,,
race10922NNrace
is10923VBZbe
different10924JJdifferent
from10925INfrom
religion10926NNreligion
.10927SENT.
Why10928WRBwhy
?10929SENT?
There10930EXthere
is10931VBZbe
no10932DTno
Establishment10933NNestablishment
Clause10934NNclause
in10935INin
regard10936NNregard
to10937TOto
race10938NNrace
.10939SENT.
What10940WPWhat
is10941VBZbe
the10942DTthe
Establishment10943NNestablishment
Clause10944NNclause
?10945SENT?
Well10946UHwell
,10947,,
it10948PPit
has10949VHZhave
something10950NNsomething
to10951TOto
do10952VVdo
with10953INwith
not10954RBnot
supporting10955VVGsupport
religion10956NNreligion
.10957SENT.
And10958CCand
there10959EXthere
is10960VBZbe
nothing10961RBnothing
more10962RBRmore
religious10963JJreligious
except10964INexcept
perhaps10965RBperhaps
for10966INfor
the10967DTthe
service10968NNservice
in10969INin
the10970DTthe
church10971NNchurch
itself10972PPitself
than10973INthan
religious10974JJreligious
education10975NNeducation
.10976SENT.
That10977DTthat
's10978VBZbe
how10979WRBhow
we10980PPwe
create10981VVPcreate
a10982DTa
future10983NNfuture
for10984INfor
our10985PP$our
religion10986NNreligion
.10987SENT.
Now10988RBnow
,10989,,
there10990EXthere
's10991VBZbe
some10992DTsome
line10993NNline
there10994RBthere
,10995,,
and10996CCand
that10997IN/thatthat
line10998NNline
may10999MDmay
be11000VBbe
what11001WPwhat
I11002PPI
have11003VHPhave
just11004RBjust
suggested11005VVNsuggest
,11006,,
impermissible11007JJimpermissible
under11008INunder
case11009NNcase
law11010NNlaw
of11011INof
this11012DTthis
Court11013NPCourt
or11014CCor
it11015PPit
may11016MDmay
be11017VBbe
permissible11018JJpermissible
but11019CCbut
unwise11020JJunwise
.11021SENT.
You11022PPyou
'd11023MDwould
like11024VVlike
to11025TOto
draw11026VVdraw
the11027DTthe
line11028NNline
.11029SENT.
Explain11030VVexplain
it11031PPit
.11032SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]11033LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Okay11034NPOkay
.11035SENT.
So11036RBso
I11037PPI
think11038VVPthink
that11039IN/thatthat
,11040,,
you11041PPyou
know11042VVPknow
,11043,,
we11044PPwe
have11045VHPhave
n't11046RBn't
talked11047VVNtalk
about11048INabout
the11049DTthe
analogies11050NNSanalogy
to11051TOto
Locke11052NPLocke
at11053INat
all11054DTall
.11055SENT.
I11056PPI
'd11057MDwould
just11058RBjust
like11059VVlike
to11060TOto
say11061VVsay
a11062DTa
few11063JJfew
words11064NNSword
about11065RBabout
that11066IN/thatthat
,11067,,
with11068INwith
I11069PPI
...11070:...
which11071WDTwhich
I11072PPI
think11073VVPthink
are11074VBPbe
consistent11075JJconsistent
to11076TOto
your11077PP$your
question11078NNquestion
.11079SENT.
So11080RBso
it11081PPit
's11082VBZbe
true11083JJtrue
that11084IN/thatthat
there11085EXthere
are11086VBPbe
factual11087JJfactual
distinctions11088NNSdistinction
between11089INbetween
this11090DTthis
case11091NNcase
and11092CCand
Locke11093NPLocke
,11094,,
right11095RBright
?11096SENT?
Locke11097NPLocke
involved11098VVDinvolve
training11099NNtraining
for11100INfor
the11101DTthe
ministry11102NNministry
and11103CCand
this11104DTthis
case11105NNcase
involves11106VVZinvolve
secondary11107JJsecondary
education11108NNeducation
.11109SENT.
So11110RBso
I'm11111NPI'm
...11112:...
I11113PPI
'm11114VBPbe
not11115RBnot
denying11116VVGdeny
...11117:...
I11118PPI
'm11119VBPbe
not11120RBnot
saying11121VVGsay
they11122PPthey
're11123VBPbe
on11124INon
all11125DTall
fours11126NNSfour
with11127INwith
each11128DTeach
other11129JJother
,11130,,
but11131CCbut
the11132DTthe
question11133NNquestion
is11134VBZbe
whether11135INwhether
that11136DTthat
distinction11137NNdistinction
can11138MDcan
be11139VBbe
located11140VVNlocate
in11141INin
the11142DTthe
free-exercise11143NNfree-exercise
clause11144NNclause
.11145SENT.
Because11146RBbecause
,11147,,
really11148RBreally
,11149,,
you11150PPyou
know11151VVPknow
,11152,,
it11153PPit
's11154VBZbe
true11155JJtrue
that11156IN/thatthat
Locke11157NPLocke
involved11158VVDinvolve
funding11159NNfunding
of11160INof
the11161DTthe
ministry11162NNministry
but11163CCbut
I11164PPI
think11165VVPthink
this11166DTthis
case11167NNcase
does11168VVZdo
too11169RBtoo
,11170,,
right11171RBright
,11172,,
the11173DTthe
ministry11174NNministry
of11175INof
teachers11176NNSteacher
towards11177INtowards
their11178PP$their
students11179NNSstudent
.11180SENT.
And11181CCand
I11182PPI
think11183VVPthink
Petitioners11184NNSpetitioner
have11185VHPhave
a11186DTa
somewhat11187RBsomewhat
revealing11188JJrevealing
statement11189NNstatement
...11190:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11191LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But11192CCbut
this11193DTthis
is11194VBZbe
a11195DTa
...11196:...
this11197DTthis
is11198VBZbe
a11199DTa
school11200NNschool
,11201,,
in11202INin
education11203NNeducation
,11204,,
there11205EXthere
satisfies11206VVZsatisfy
the11207DTthe
compulsory11208JJcompulsory
education11209NNeducation
laws11210NNSlaw
of11211INof
the11212DTthe
state11213NNstate
,11214,,
correct11215JJcorrect
?11216SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]11217LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
That11218DTthat
's11219VBZbe
true11220JJtrue
.11221SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11222LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And11223CCand
so11224RBso
that11225WDTthat
's11226VBZbe
different11227JJdifferent
from11228INfrom
Locke11229NPLocke
,11230,,
as11231INas
Professor11232NPProfessor
Laycock11233NPLaycock
's11234POS's
amicus11235NNamicus
brief11236NNbrief
points11237VVZpoint
out11238RPout
in11239INin
a11240DTa
very11241RBvery
narrow11242JJnarrow
decision11243NNdecision
about11244INabout
training11245NNtraining
of11246INof
the11247DTthe
clergy11248NNclergy
.11249SENT.
And11250CCand
it11251PPit
seems11252VVZseem
to11253TOto
me11254PPme
there11255EXthere
are11256VBPbe
two11257CDtwo
different11258JJdifferent
things11259NNSthing
going11260VVGgo
on11261INon
here11262RBhere
,11263,,
it11264PPit
seems11265VVZseem
to11266TOto
me11267PPme
.11268SENT.
One11269PPone
is11270VBZbe
to11271TOto
Justice11272NPJustice
Breyer11273NPBreyer
's11274POS's
question11275NNquestion
,11276,,
just11277RBjust
funding11278VVGfund
religion11279NNreligion
,11280,,
funding11281VVGfund
religious11282JJreligious
schools11283NNSschool
generally11284RBgenerally
or11285CCor
training11286VVGtrain
of11287INof
clergy11288NNclergy
is11289VBZbe
...11290:...
is11291VBZbe
an11292DTan
establishment11293NNestablishment
clause11294NNclause
concern11295NNconcern
,11296,,
but11297CCbut
this11298DTthis
...11299:...
it11300PPit
's11301VBZbe
a11302DTa
separate11303JJseparate
issue11304NNissue
when11305WRBwhen
you11306PPyou
set11307VVDset
up11308RPup
a11309DTa
neutral11310JJneutral
benefit11311NNbenefit
program11312NNprogram
...11313:...
police11314NNSpolice
,11315,,
fire11316NNfire
,11317,,
or11318CCor
scholarships11319NNSscholarship
...11320:...
and11321CCand
allow11322VVallow
people11323NNSpeople
to11324TOto
use11325VVuse
those11326DTthose
things11327NNSthing
,11328,,
allow11329VVallow
religious11330JJreligious
institutions11331NNSinstitution
to11332TOto
obtain11333VVobtain
the11334DTthe
benefits11335NNSbenefit
of11336INof
those11337DTthose
things11338NNSthing
on11339INon
a11340DTa
non-discriminatory11341JJnon-discriminatory
basis11342NNbasis
.11343SENT.
And11344CCand
the11345DTthe
question11346NNquestion
in11347INin
this11348DTthis
case11349NNcase
,11350,,
it11351PPit
seems11352VVZseem
to11353TOto
me11354PPme
,11355,,
is11356VBZbe
which11357WDTwhich
side11358NNside
of11359INof
that11360WDTthat
line11361NNline
this11362DTthis
comes11363VVZcome
on11364INon
.11365SENT.
Is11366VBZbe
that11367IN/thatthat
the11368DTthe
...11369:...
a11370DTa
proper11371JJproper
way11372NNway
to11373TOto
look11374VVlook
at11375INat
it11376PPit
?11377SENT?
And11378CCand
if11379INif
so11380RBso
,11381,,
why11382WRBwhy
does11383VVZdo
it11384PPit
come11385VVcome
on11386INon
the11387DTthe
funding11388NNfunding
side11389NNside
?11390SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]11391LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I11392PPI
...11393:...
I11394PPI
guess11395VVPguess
I11396PPI
'm11397VBPbe
not11398RBnot
really11399RBreally
sure11400JJsure
that11401WDTthat
's11402VBZbe
the11403DTthe
right11404JJright
way11405NNway
to11406TOto
look11407VVlook
at11408INat
it11409PPit
.11410SENT.
I11411PPI
think11412VVPthink
that11413IN/thatthat
it11414PPit
's11415VBZbe
important11416JJimportant
to11417TOto
just11418RBjust
look11419VVlook
at11420INat
the11421DTthe
interest11422NNinterest
the11423DTthe
no-aid11424NNno-aid
clause11425NNclause
protects11426VVZprotect
,11427,,
understand11428VVPunderstand
whether11429INwhether
those11430DTthose
are11431VBPbe
just11432RBjust
unconstitutional11433JJunconstitutional
and11434CCand
whether11435INwhether
they11436PPthey
apply11437VVPapply
to11438TOto
this11439DTthis
case11440NNcase
.11441SENT.
So11442RBso
as11443INas
I11444PPI
said11445VVDsay
,11446,,
the11447DTthe
no-aid11448NNno-aid
clause11449NNclause
was11450VBDbe
concerned11451VVNconcern
about11452INabout
using11453VVGuse
government11454NNgovernment
leverage11455NNleverage
to11456TOto
influence11457VVinfluence
religious11458JJreligious
education11459NNeducation
.11460SENT.
And11461CCand
it11462PPit
's11463VBZbe
very11464RBvery
easy11465JJeasy
how11466WRBhow
...11467:...
to11468TOto
see11469VVsee
how11470WRBhow
that11471DTthat
can11472MDcan
happen11473VVhappen
in11474INin
the11475DTthe
context11476NNcontext
of11477INof
even11478RBeven
a11479DTa
neutral11480JJneutral
program11481NNprogram
like11482INlike
this11483DTthis
one11484CDone
.11485SENT.
The11486DTthe
state11487NNstate
can11488MDcan
just11489RBjust
have11490VHhave
a11491DTa
condition11492NNcondition
...11493:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11494LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
You11495PPyou
think11496VVPthink
that11497WDTthat
was11498VBDbe
the11499DTthe
design11500NNdesign
of11501INof
the11502DTthe
no-aid11503NNno-aid
clause11504NNclause
,11505,,
to11506TOto
...11507:...
to11508TOto
help11509VVhelp
religious11510JJreligious
institutions11511NNSinstitution
?11512SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]11513LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yeah11514NPYeah
.11515SENT.
If11516INif
you11517PPyou
look11518VVPlook
at11519INat
the11520DTthe
transcripts11521NNStranscript
of11522INof
197211523CD@card@
,11524,,
that11525WDTthat
's11526VBZbe
...11527:...
is11528VBZbe
...11529:...
what11530WPwhat
it11531PPit
's11532VBZbe
all11533RBall
about11534RBabout
.11535SENT.
There11536RBthere
...11537:...
there11538EXthere
is11539VBZbe
numerous11540JJnumerous
religious11541JJreligious
leaders11542NNSleader
who11543WPwho
came11544VVDcome
forward11545RBforward
and11546CCand
testified11547VVDtestify
that11548IN/thatthat
that11549DTthat
's11550VBZbe
the11551DTthe
reason11552NNreason
they11553PPthey
wanted11554VVDwant
it11555PPit
.11556SENT.
On11557INon
the11558DTthe
floor11559NNfloor
of11560INof
the11561DTthe
convention11562NNconvention
in11563INin
197211564CD@card@
,11565,,
the11566DTthe
strongest11567JJSstrong
proponent11568NNproponent
was11569VBDbe
Delegate11570NNdelegate
Harper11571NPHarper
who11572WPwho
was11573VBDbe
not11574RBnot
an11575DTan
anti-religious11576JJanti-religious
bigot11577NNbigot
.11578SENT.
He11579PPhe
was11580VBDbe
the11581DTthe
pastor11582NNpastor
of11583INof
a11584DTa
church11585NNchurch
in11586INin
Helena11587NPHelena
and11588CCand
he11589PPhe
told11590VVDtell
his11591PP$his
colleagues11592NNScolleague
,11593,,
drawing11594VVGdraw
on11595INon
his11596PP$his
own11597JJown
religious11598JJreligious
faith11599NNfaith
,11600,,
that11601IN/thatthat
the11602DTthe
no-aid11603NNno-aid
clause11604NNclause
was11605VBDbe
necessary11606JJnecessary
to11607TOto
ensure11608VVensure
that11609IN/thatthat
religious11610JJreligious
schools11611NNSschool
were11612VBDbe
independent11613JJindependent
from11614INfrom
government11615NNgovernment
.11616SENT.
So11617RBso
I11618PPI
just11619RBjust
do11620VVPdo
n't11621RBn't
...11622:...
and11623CCand
there11624EXthere
's11625VBZbe
a11626DTa
committee11627NNcommittee
report11628NNreport
...11629:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11630LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well11631UHWell
,11632,,
no11633DTno
one11634CDone
's11635VBZbe
compelling11636VVGcompel
the11637DTthe
religious11638JJreligious
schools11639NNSschool
to11640TOto
participate11641VVparticipate
in11642INin
a11643DTa
program11644NNprogram
in11645INin
order11646NNorder
to11647TOto
accept11648VVaccept
funds11649NNSfund
from11650INfrom
the11651DTthe
program11652NNprogram
,11653,,
correct11654JJcorrect
?11655SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]11656LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
That11657DTthat
is11658VBZbe
certainly11659RBcertainly
true11660JJtrue
.11661SENT.
But11662CCbut
...11663:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11664LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
So11665INso
a11666DTa
religious11667JJreligious
school11668NNschool
that11669WDTthat
does11670VVZdo
n't11671RBn't
want11672VVwant
to11673TOto
be11674VBbe
part11675NNpart
of11676INof
a11677DTa
neutral11678JJneutral
program11679NNprogram
does11680VVZdo
n't11681RBn't
have11682VHhave
to11683TOto
be11684VBbe
.11685SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]11686LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
Yeah11687NPYeah
,11688,,
that11689WDTthat
's11690VBZbe
true11691JJtrue
.11692SENT.
But11693CCbut
I11694PPI
mean11695VVPmean
,11696,,
there11697EXthere
's11698VBZbe
still11699RBstill
a11700DTa
concern11701NNconcern
that11702IN/thatthat
ultimately11703RBultimately
the11704DTthe
inevitable11705JJinevitable
effect11706NNeffect
of11707INof
these11708DTthese
programs11709NNSprogram
is11710VBZbe
that11711IN/thatthat
the11712DTthe
government11713NNgovernment
would11714MDwould
exercise11715VVexercise
its11716PP$its
leverage11717NNleverage
over11718INover
schools11719NNSschool
.11720SENT.
And11721CCand
,11722,,
look11723VVPlook
,11724,,
this11725DTthis
is11726VBZbe
what11727WPwhat
people11728NNSpeople
were11729VBDbe
saying11730VVGsay
at11731INat
the11732DTthe
hearing11733NNhearing
,11734,,
and11735CCand
I11736PPI
think11737VVPthink
that11738IN/thatthat
may11739MDmay
be11740VBbe
a11741DTa
little11742RBlittle
paternalistic11743JJpaternalistic
,11744,,
but11745CCbut
I11746PPI
think11747VVPthink
the11748DTthe
state11749NNstate
is11750VBZbe
allowed11751VVNallow
to11752TOto
have11753VHhave
a11754DTa
structural11755JJstructural
provision11756NNprovision
being11757VBGbe
arguably11758RBarguably
paternalistic11759JJpaternalistic
in11760INin
its11761PP$its
own11762JJown
state11763NNstate
constitution11764NNconstitution
.11765SENT.
There11766EXthere
's11767VBZbe
no11768DTno
bigotry11769NNbigotry
whatsoever11770RBwhatsoever
in11771INin
evidence11772NNevidence
from11773INfrom
the11774DTthe
actual11775JJactual
convention11776NNconvention
at11777INat
which11778WDTwhich
this11779DTthis
is11780VBZbe
enacted11781VVNenact
.11782SENT.
I11783PPI
just11784RBjust
do11785VVPdo
n't11786RBn't
understand11787VVunderstand
how11788WRBhow
Montana11789NPMontana
could11790MDcould
have11791VHhave
done11792VVNdo
any11793DTany
better11794JJRgood
than11795INthan
it11796PPit
did11797VVDdo
,11798,,
to11799TOto
wipe11800VVwipe
out11801RPout
its11802PP$its
entire11803JJentire
state11804NNstate
constitution11805NNconstitution
,11806,,
start11807VVstart
all11808RBall
over11809INover
again11810RBagain
,11811,,
have11812VHPhave
committee11813NNcommittee
hearings11814NNShearing
...11815:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11816LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I11817PPI
think11818VVPthink
the11819DTthe
other11820JJother
side11821NNside
's11822POS's
argument11823NNargument
is11824VBZbe
the11825DTthe
way11826NNway
you11827PPyou
can11828MDcan
do11829VVdo
better11830JJRgood
is11831VBZbe
to11832TOto
say11833VVsay
:11834::
If11835INif
we11836PPwe
're11837VBPbe
going11838VVGgo
to11839TOto
give11840VVgive
benefits11841NNSbenefit
to11842TOto
private11843JJprivate
schools11844NNSschool
,11845,,
which11846WDTwhich
you11847PPyou
do11848VVPdo
n't11849RBn't
have11850VHhave
to11851TOto
do11852VVdo
...11853:...
to11854TOto
Justice11855NPJustice
Breyer11856NPBreyer
's11857POS's
question11858NNquestion
,11859,,
you11860PPyou
do11861VVPdo
not11862RBnot
have11863VHhave
to11864TOto
give11865VVgive
benefits11866NNSbenefit
to11867TOto
private11868JJprivate
schools11869NNSschool
or11870CCor
funds11871NNSfund
or11872CCor
tax11873NNtax
credits11874NNScredit
,11875,,
but11876CCbut
if11877INif
you11878PPyou
do11879VVPdo
,11880,,
do11881VVPdo
n't11882RBn't
tell11883VVtell
someone11884NNsomeone
they11885PPthey
can11886MDcan
't11887RB't
participate11888VVparticipate
because11889INbecause
they11890PPthey
're11891VBPbe
Jewish11892JJJewish
or11893CCor
Protestant11894JJProtestant
or11895CCor
Catholic11896JJCatholic
.11897SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]11898LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
I11899PPI
guess11900VVPguess
the11901DTthe
...11902:...
the11903DTthe
concern11904NNconcern
of11905INof
the11906DTthe
delegates11907NNSdelegate
was11908VBDbe
that11909IN/thatthat
if11910INif
you11911PPyou
have11912VHPhave
money11913NNmoney
going11914VVGgo
to11915TOto
religious11916JJreligious
schools11917NNSschool
,11918,,
that11919WDTthat
's11920VBZbe
going11921VVGgo
to11922TOto
lead11923VVlead
to11924TOto
entanglement11925NNentanglement
problems11926NNSproblem
.11927SENT.
And11928CCand
the11929DTthe
way11930NNway
to11931TOto
solve11932VVsolve
that11933DTthat
problem11934NNproblem
is11935VBZbe
to11936TOto
have11937VHhave
a11938DTa
structural11939JJstructural
provision11940NNprovision
saying11941VVGsay
,11942,,
we11943PPwe
're11944VBPbe
not11945RBnot
going11946VVGgo
to11947TOto
do11948VVdo
it11949PPit
.11950SENT.
And11951CCand
that11952DTthat
's11953VBZbe
not11954RBnot
prohibiting11955VVGprohibit
anyone11956NNanyone
from11957INfrom
exercising11958VVGexercise
their11959PP$their
religion11960NNreligion
.11961SENT.
It11962PPit
's11963VBZbe
simply11964RBsimply
separating11965VVGseparate
the11966DTthe
church11967NNchurch
from11968INfrom
the11969DTthe
state11970NNstate
without11971INwithout
,11972,,
again11973RBagain
,11974,,
preventing11975VVGprevent
anyone11976NNanyone
from11977INfrom
going11978VVGgo
to11979TOto
any11980DTany
of11981INof
these11982DTthese
schools11983NNSschool
if11984INif
they11985PPthey
do11986VVPdo
n't11987RBn't
want11988VVwant
to11989TOto
.11990SENT.
And11991CCand
it11992PPit
's11993VBZbe
true11994JJtrue
that11995IN/thatthat
there11996EXthere
's11997VBZbe
a11998DTa
constraint11999NNconstraint
in12000INin
the12001DTthe
Federal12002NPFederal
Constitution12003NPConstitution
that12004WDTthat
says12005VVZsay
that12006IN/thatthat
you12007PPyou
can12008MDcan
't12009RB't
coerce12010VVcoerce
people12011NNSpeople
,12012,,
you12013PPyou
can12014MDcan
't12015RB't
tell12016VVtell
people12017NNSpeople
we12018PPwe
're12019VBPbe
going12020VVGgo
to12021TOto
penalize12022VVpenalize
you12023PPyou
for12024INfor
being12025VBGbe
religious12026JJreligious
.12027SENT.
But12028CCbut
if12029INif
a12030DTa
state12031NNstate
has12032VHZhave
two12033CDtwo
principles12034NNSprinciple
it12035PPit
wants12036VVZwant
to12037TOto
stick12038VVstick
to12039TOto
at12040INat
the12041DTthe
same12042JJsame
time12043NNtime
then12044RBthen
we12045PPwe
think12046VVPthink
that12047IN/thatthat
it12048PPit
should12049MDshould
be12050VBbe
able12051JJable
to12052TOto
balance12053VVbalance
those12054DTthose
principles12055NNSprinciple
by12056INby
invalidating12057VVGinvalidate
the12058DTthe
program12059NNprogram
.12060SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]12061LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Mr12062NPMr
.12063SENT.
Unikowsky12064NPUnikowsky
,12065,,
if12066INif
we12067PPwe
can12068MDcan
just12069RBjust
go12070VVgo
back12071RBback
to12072TOto
the12073DTthe
standing12074NNstanding
question12075NNquestion
.12076SENT.
You12077PPyou
are12078VBPbe
not12079RBnot
at12080INat
liberty12081NNliberty
to12082TOto
waive12083VVwaive
Article12084NPArticle
III12085NPIII
,12086,,
so12087RBso
why12088WRBwhy
do12089VVPdo
you12090PPyou
think12091VVPthink
this12092DTthis
case12093NNcase
does12094VVZdo
n't12095RBn't
fit12096VVfit
under12097INunder
Eastern12098NPEastern
Kentucky12099NPKentucky
?12100SENT?
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]12101LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So12102INso
I'll12103NPI'll
...12104:...
I12105PPI
'll12106MDwill
just12107RBjust
answer12108VVanswer
briefly12109RBbriefly
,12110,,
Your12111PP$your
Honor12112NPHonor
.12113SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12114LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Sure12115NPSure
.12116SENT.
[MR. UNIKOWSKY]12117LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY]
So12118INso
Petitioners12119NNSpetitioner
are12120VBPbe
claiming12121VVGclaim
they12122PPthey
personally12123RBpersonally
are12124VBPbe
the12125DTthe
victims12126NNSvictim
of12127INof
status12128NNstatus
discrimination12129NNdiscrimination
,12130,,
which12131WDTwhich
is12132VBZbe
the12133DTthe
argument12134NNargument
that12135WDTthat
was12136VBDbe
n't12137RBn't
made12138VVNmake
in12139INin
that12140DTthat
case12141NNcase
.12142SENT.
So12143RBso
we12144PPwe
think12145VVPthink
that12146IN/thatthat
they12147PPthey
're12148VBPbe
allowed12149VVNallow
to12150TOto
make12151VVmake
that12152DTthat
argument12153NNargument
,12154,,
it12155PPit
is12156VBZbe
just12157RBjust
incorrect12158JJincorrect
on12159INon
its12160PP$its
merits12161NNSmerit
.12162SENT.
But12163CCbut
,12164,,
of12165INof
course12166NNcourse
,12167,,
this12168DTthis
argument12169NNargument
is12170VBZbe
made12171VVNmake
in12172INin
amicus12173NNamicus
brief12174NNbrief
.12175SENT.
And12176CCand
,12177,,
as12178INas
you12179PPyou
say12180VVPsay
,12181,,
we12182PPwe
're12183VBPbe
not12184RBnot
able12185JJable
to12186TOto
waive12187VVwaive
it12188PPit
.12189SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12190LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank12191VVthank
you12192PPyou
,12193,,
counsel12194NNcounsel
.12195SENT.
Mr12196NPMr
.12197SENT.
Komer12198NPKomer
,12199,,
two12200CDtwo
minutes12201NNSminute
remaining12202VVGremain
.12203SENT.
[MR. KOMER]12204LOC[MR. KOMER]
Thank12205VVthank
you12206PPyou
.12207SENT.
What12208WPWhat
we12209PPwe
're12210VBPbe
saying12211VVGsay
here12212RBhere
is12213VBZbe
that12214DTthat
...12215:...
what12216WPwhat
Trinity12217NPTrinity
Lutheran12218NPLutheran
says12219VVZsay
,12220,,
the12221DTthe
state12222NNstate
can12223MDcan
't12224RB't
discriminate12225JJdiscriminate
on12226INon
the12227DTthe
basis12228NNbasis
of12229INof
religion12230NNreligion
.12231SENT.
The12232DTthe
decision12233NNdecision
is12234VBZbe
crystal12235JJcrystal
clear12236VVclear
when12237WRBwhen
you12238PPyou
read12239VVPread
it12240PPit
that12241IN/thatthat
that12242DTthat
is12243VBZbe
what12244WPwhat
they12245PPthey
are12246VBPbe
doing12247VVGdo
in12248INin
this12249DTthis
case12250NNcase
.12251SENT.
They12252PPthey
focus12253VVPfocus
on12254INon
the12255DTthe
religious12256JJreligious
affiliation12257NNaffiliation
or12258CCor
religious12259JJreligious
nature12260NNnature
of12261INof
the12262DTthe
schools12263NNSschool
.12264SENT.
They12265PPthey
are12266VBPbe
not12267RBnot
talking12268VVGtalk
about12269INabout
what12270WPwhat
the12271DTthe
schools12272NNSschool
do12273VVPdo
.12274SENT.
They12275PPthey
are12276VBPbe
talking12277VVGtalk
about12278INabout
what12279WPwhat
the12280DTthe
schools12281NNSschool
are12282VBPbe
.12283SENT.
Second12284RBsecond
,12285,,
Zelman12286NPZelman
has12287VHZhave
already12288RBalready
answered12289VVNanswer
the12290DTthe
question12291NNquestion
about12292INabout
who12293WPwho
this12294DTthis
program12295NNprogram
is12296VBZbe
aiding12297VVGaid
.12298SENT.
It12299PPit
's12300VBZbe
not12301RBnot
aiding12302VVGaid
the12303DTthe
schools12304NNSschool
.12305SENT.
It12306PPit
is12307VBZbe
aiding12308VVGaid
the12309DTthe
parents12310NNSparent
.12311SENT.
You12312PPyou
have12313VHPhave
a12314DTa
choice12315NNchoice
to12316TOto
make12317VVmake
about12318INabout
the12319DTthe
parents12320NNSparent
here12321RBhere
.12322SENT.
You12323PPyou
can12324MDcan
either12325RBeither
view12326VVview
them12327PPthem
as12328INas
mere12329JJmere
inconsequential12330JJinconsequential
conduits12331NNSconduit
through12332INthrough
which12333WDTwhich
public12334JJpublic
funds12335NNSfund
flow12336NNflow
to12337TOto
the12338DTthe
religious12339JJreligious
schools12340NNSschool
they12341PPthey
choose12342VVPchoose
or12343CCor
you12344PPyou
can12345MDcan
regard12346VVregard
them12347PPthem
,12348,,
as12349INas
you12350PPyou
did12351VVDdo
in12352INin
Zelman12353NPZelman
,12354,,
as12355INas
free12356JJfree
and12357CCand
independent12358JJindependent
decision-makers12359NNSdecision-maker
who12360WPwho
are12361VBPbe
being12362VBGbe
given12363VVNgive
the12364DTthe
power12365NNpower
to12366TOto
choose12367VVchoose
a12368DTa
religious12369JJreligious
education12370NNeducation
or12371CCor
a12372DTa
secular12373JJsecular
education12374NNeducation
in12375INin
private12376JJprivate
schools12377NNSschool
.12378SENT.
We12379PPwe
are12380VBPbe
not12381RBnot
arguing12382VVGargue
that12383IN/thatthat
the12384DTthe
state12385NNstate
could12386MDcould
n't12387RBn't
just12388RBjust
fund12389VVfund
public12390JJpublic
schools12391NNSschool
.12392SENT.
We12393PPwe
are12394VBPbe
saying12395VVGsay
that12396IN/thatthat
when12397WRBwhen
the12398DTthe
legislature12399NNlegislature
,12400,,
when12401WRBwhen
the12402DTthe
state12403NNstate
makes12404VVZmake
the12405DTthe
decision12406NNdecision
to12407TOto
empower12408VVempower
parents12409NNSparent
to12410TOto
exercise12411VVexercise
their12412PP$their
right12413NNright
to12414TOto
choose12415VVchoose
and12416CCand
direct12417VVdirect
their12418PP$their
children12419NNSchild
's12420POS's
education12421NNeducation
,12422,,
that12423IN/thatthat
the12424DTthe
state12425NNstate
cannot12426MDcan
distinguish12427VVdistinguish
between12428INbetween
parents12429NNSparent
who12430WPwho
want12431VVPwant
a12432DTa
religious12433JJreligious
education12434NNeducation
for12435INfor
their12436PP$their
children12437NNSchild
and12438CCand
parents12439NNSparent
who12440WPwho
want12441VVPwant
a12442DTa
secular12443JJsecular
private12444JJprivate
education12445NNeducation
for12446INfor
their12447PP$their
parents12448NNSparent
.12449SENT.
We12450PPwe
are12451VBPbe
only12452RBonly
in12453INin
that12454DTthat
area12455NNarea
because12456INbecause
the12457DTthe
state12458NNstate
legislature12459NNlegislature
has12460VHZhave
made12461VVNmake
,12462,,
like12463INlike
Montana12464NPMontana
did12465VVDdo
,12466,,
the12467DTthe
decision12468NNdecision
to12469TOto
open12470VVopen
it12471PPit
up12472RPup
beyond12473INbeyond
the12474DTthe
public12475JJpublic
schools12476NNSschool
.12477SENT.
We12478PPwe
do12479VVPdo
n't12480RBn't
question12481VVquestion
that12482IN/thatthat
the12483DTthe
public12484JJpublic
schools12485NNSschool
must12486MDmust
be12487VBbe
secular12488JJsecular
.12489SENT.
This12490DTthis
Court12491NPCourt
recognized12492VVDrecognize
that12493IN/thatthat
in12494INin
Schempp12495NPSchempp
.12496SENT.
And12497CCand
,12498,,
as12499INas
a12500DTa
result12501NNresult
,12502,,
the12503DTthe
public12504JJpublic
schools12505NNSschool
now12506RBnow
must12507MDmust
be12508VBbe
secular12509JJsecular
.12510SENT.
But12511CCbut
at12512INat
the12513DTthe
time12514NNtime
these12515DTthese
provisions12516NNSprovision
were12517VBDbe
passed12518VVNpass
,12519,,
the12520DTthe
public12521JJpublic
schools12522NNSschool
were12523VBDbe
not12524RBnot
secular12525JJsecular
.12526SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12527LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
It12528PPit
's12529VBZbe
almost12530RBalmost
...12531:...
[MR. KOMER]12532LOC[MR. KOMER]
That12533DTthat
is12534VBZbe
why12535WRBwhy
...12536:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12537LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
It12538PPit
's12539VBZbe
almost12540RBalmost
sort12541NNsort
of12542INof
a12543DTa
illusory12544JJillusory
state12545NNstate
,12546,,
is12547VBZbe
n't12548RBn't
it12549PPit
?12550SENT?
The12551DTthe
legislatures12552NNSlegislature
can12553MDcan
choose12554VVchoose
to12555TOto
give12556VVgive
money12557NNmoney
or12558CCor
not12559RBnot
.12560SENT.
If12561INif
they12562PPthey
choose12563VVPchoose
,12564,,
they12565PPthey
have12566VHPhave
to12567TOto
do12568VVdo
it12569PPit
this12570DTthis
way12571NNway
.12572SENT.
But12573CCbut
the12574DTthe
court12575NNcourt
system12576NNsystem
is12577VBZbe
out12578RPout
of12579INof
it12580PPit
because12581INbecause
it12582PPit
can12583MDcan
't12584RB't
force12585VVforce
the12586DTthe
legislatures12587NNSlegislature
to12588TOto
act12589VVact
constitutionally12590RBconstitutionally
under12591INunder
their12592PP$their
own12593JJown
constitution12594NNconstitution
.12595SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12596LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
You12597PPyou
may12598MDmay
...12599:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12600LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That12601DTthat
's12602VBZbe
basically12603RBbasically
what12604WPwhat
you12605PPyou
're12606VBPbe
saying12607VVGsay
,12608,,
is12609VBZbe
n't12610RBn't
it12611PPit
?12612SENT?
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12613LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
You12614PPyou
may12615MDmay
answer12616VVanswer
briefly12617RBbriefly
.12618SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12619LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
And12620CCand
not12621RBnot
fund12622NNfund
.12623SENT.
[MR. KOMER]12624LOC[MR. KOMER]
We12625PPwe
're12626VBPbe
saying12627VVGsay
the12628DTthe
legislature12629NNlegislature
ab12630NPab
initio12631NPInitio
might12632MDmight
be12633VBbe
able12634JJable
to12635TOto
do12636VVdo
more12637JJRmore
than12638INthan
what12639WPwhat
the12640DTthe
court12641NNcourt
should12642MDshould
have12643VHhave
done12644VVNdo
here12645RBhere
.12646SENT.
They12647PPthey
should12648MDshould
have12649VHhave
answered12650VVNanswer
the12651DTthe
federal12652JJfederal
question12653NNquestion
.12654SENT.
They12655PPthey
should12656MDshould
have12657VHhave
recognized12658VVNrecognize
that12659IN/thatthat
Trinity12660NPTrinity
Lutheran12661NPLutheran
is12662VBZbe
applicable12663JJapplicable
.12664SENT.
They12665PPthey
should12666MDshould
have12667VHhave
recognized12668VVNrecognize
they12669PPthey
were12670VBDbe
applying12671VVGapply
Locke12672NPLocke
exactly12673RBexactly
the12674DTthe
way12675NNway
Missouri12676NPMissouri
tried12677VVDtry
to12678TOto
.12679SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12680LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank12681VVthank
you12682PPyou
,12683,,
counsel12684NNcounsel
.12685SENT.
The12686DTthe
case12687NNcase
is12688VBZbe
submitted12689VVNsubmit
.12690SENT.