<s> /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/ptreetagger/Espinoza.xml-src.tt /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/treetagger/Espinoza.xml-out.tt pos tagset built from model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par en lemma of the model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par - [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We2PPwe 'll3MDwill hear4VVhear argument5NNargument this6DTthis morning7NNmorning in8INin Case9NPCase 18-119510CD@card@ ,11,, Espinoza12NPEspinoza versus13CCversus the14DTthe Montana15NPMontana Department16NPDepartment of17INof Revenue18NPRevenue .19SENT. Mr20NPMr .21SENT. Komer22NPKomer .23SENT.

[MR. KOMER]24LOC[MR. KOMER] Mr25NPMr .26SENT. Chief27NPChief Justice28NPJustice ,29,, and30CCand may31MDmay it32PPit please33VVplease the34DTthe Court35NPCourt :36:: This37DTthis case38NNcase asks39VVZask whether40INwhether the41DTthe Federal42NPFederal Constitution43NPConstitution allows44VVZallow the45DTthe wholesale46JJwholesale exclusion47NNexclusion of48INof religious49JJreligious schools50NNSschool from51INfrom scholarship52NNscholarship programs53NNSprogram .54SENT. It55PPit does56VVZdo not57RBnot .58SENT. Yet59RByet ,60,, Montana61NPMontana 's62POS's Blaine63NPBlaine Amendment64NPAmendment requires65VVZrequire that66DTthat exclusion67NNexclusion .68SENT. As69INas a70DTa result71NNresult ,72,, the73DTthe Blaine74NPBlaine Amendment75NPAmendment discriminates76VVZdiscriminate against77INagainst religious78JJreligious conduct79NNconduct ,80,, beliefs81NNSbelief ,82,, and83CCand status84NNstatus in85INin violation86NNviolation of87INof the88DTthe free-exercise89NNfree-exercise clause90NNclause under91INunder Trinity92NPTrinity Lutheran93NPLutheran .94SENT. The95DTthe Montana96NPMontana Supreme97NPSupreme Court98NPCourt disagreed99VVDdisagree .100SENT. That101DTthat court102NNcourt held103VVDhold that104IN/thatthat barring105VVGbar religious106JJreligious schools107NNSschool from108INfrom the109DTthe program110NNprogram did111VVDdo not112RBnot violate113VVviolate the114DTthe Federal115NPFederal Constitution116NPConstitution .117SENT. This118DTthis Court119NPCourt should120MDshould reverse121VVreverse that122DTthat judgment123NNjudgment .124SENT. Even125RBeven Respondents126NNSrespondent now127RBnow concede128VVPconcede that129IN/thatthat excluding130VVGexclude religious131JJreligious schools132NNSschool from133INfrom the134DTthe program135NNprogram is136VBZbe unconstitutional137JJunconstitutional ,138,, but139CCbut they140PPthey argue141VVPargue that142IN/thatthat the143DTthe court144NNcourt avoided145VVDavoid this146DTthis discrimination147NNdiscrimination by148INby invalidating149VVGinvalidate the150DTthe entire151JJentire program152NNprogram .153SENT. This154DTthis is155VBZbe wrong156JJwrong .157SENT. The158DTthe only159JJonly reason160NNreason the161DTthe court162NNcourt invalidated163VVDinvalidate the164DTthe program165NNprogram was166VBDbe because167INbecause it168PPit included169VVDinclude religious170JJreligious schools171NNSschool .172SENT. And173CCand the174DTthe court175NNcourt 's176POS's remedy177NNremedy did178VVDdo not179RBnot cure180VVcure its181PP$its discriminatory182JJdiscriminatory judgment183NNjudgment ,184,, nor185CCnor should186MDshould the187DTthe remedy188NNremedy shield189VVshield the190DTthe judgment191NNjudgment from192INfrom review193NNreview .194SENT. Petitioners195NNSpetitioner brought196VVDbring this197DTthis lawsuit198NNlawsuit because199INbecause they200PPthey were201VBDbe denied202VVNdeny scholarships203NNSscholarship based204VVNbase on205INon religion206NNreligion ,207,, and208CCand they209PPthey are210VBPbe still211RBstill being212VBGbe denied213VVNdeny scholarships214NNSscholarship based215VVNbase on216INon religion217NNreligion .218SENT. If219INif the220DTthe court221NNcourt had222VHDhave shut223VVNshut down224RPdown the225DTthe program226NNprogram because227INbecause it228PPit included229VVDinclude Muslim230JJMuslim schools231NNSschool or232CCor African-American233NPAfrican-American schools234NNSschool ,235,, there236EXthere 's237VBZbe no238DTno question239NNquestion that240WDTthat would241MDwould be242VBbe unconstitutional243JJunconstitutional .244SENT. We245PPwe ask246VVPask you247PPyou to248TOto reverse249VVreverse .250SENT. Respondents251NNSrespondent argue252VVPargue in253INin the254DTthe alternative255NNalternative that256IN/thatthat Locke257NPLocke allows258VVZallow them259PPthem to260TOto exclude261VVexclude the262DTthe religious263JJreligious schools264NNSschool and265CCand that266IN/thatthat this267DTthis case268NNcase falls269VVZfall within270INwithin the271DTthe play272NNplay in273INin the274DTthe joints275NNSjoint .276SENT. But277CCbut that278WDTthat would279MDwould allow280VVallow the281DTthe exception282NNexception to283TOto swallow284VVswallow the285DTthe rule286NNrule .287SENT. As288INas Trinity289NPTrinity Lutheran290NPLutheran made291VVDmake clear292JJclear ,293,, the294DTthe rule295NNrule is296VBZbe religious297JJreligious neutrality298NNneutrality and299CCand Locke300NPLocke only301RBonly a302DTa narrow303JJnarrow exception304NNexception .305SENT. We306PPwe argue307VVPargue that308IN/thatthat Locke309NPLocke is310VBZbe the311DTthe exception312NNexception that313WDTthat proves314VVZprove the315DTthe rule316NNrule .317SENT. 2318CD2 In319INin Trinity320NPTrinity Lutheran321NPLutheran ...322:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]323LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] May324NPmay ...325:... may326MDmay I327PPI ask328VVask you329PPyou some330DTsome threshold331NNthreshold questions332NNSquestion about333INabout Article334NPArticle III335NPIII standing336NNstanding ?337SENT? Under338INunder the339DTthe Montana340NPMontana judgment341NNjudgment ,342,, these343DTthese parents344NNSparent are345VBPbe treated346VVNtreat no347RBno differently348RBdifferently than349INthan parents350NNSparent of351INof children352NNSchild who353WPwho are354VBPbe going355VVGgo to356TOto secular357JJsecular private358JJprivate schools359NNSschool ,360,, so361RBso where362WRBwhere is363VBZbe the364DTthe harm365NNharm ?366SENT? When367WRBwhen a368DTa differential369NNdifferential is370VBZbe challenged371VVNchallenge ,372,, the373DTthe court374NNcourt inspecting375VVGinspect the376DTthe state377NNstate law378NNlaw can379MDcan level380VVlevel up381RPup or382CCor level383VVlevel down384RPdown .385SENT. And386CCand here387RBhere it388PPit leveled389VVDlevel down390RPdown .391SENT. So392RBso these393DTthese would394MDwould be395VBbe parents396NNSparent of397INof children398NNSchild going399VVGgo to400TOto secular401JJsecular private402JJprivate schools403NNSschool .404SENT. How405WRBHow are406VBPbe you407PPyou harmed408VVNharm ?409SENT? [MR. KOMER]410LOC[MR. KOMER] Your411PP$your Honor412NPHonor ,413,, the414DTthe Montana415NPMontana Supreme416NPSupreme Court417NPCourt lacked418VVDlack the419DTthe necessary420JJnecessary predicate421NNpredicate for422INfor leveling423VVGlevel up424RPup or425CCor for426INfor leveling427VVGlevel down428RPdown because429INbecause they430PPthey got431VVDget the432DTthe federal433JJfederal Supreme434NPSupreme Court435NPCourt question436NNquestion wrong437JJwrong .438SENT. But439CCbut for440INfor getting441VVGget that442DTthat question443NNquestion wrong444JJwrong ,445,, we446PPwe would447MDwould never448RBnever have449VHhave moved450VVNmove on451RPon to452TOto the453DTthe issue454NNissue of455INof remedying456VVGremedy that457DTthat problem458NNproblem because459INbecause it460PPit is461VBZbe n't462RBn't a463DTa constitutional464JJconstitutional problem465NNproblem .466SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]467LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But468CCbut there469EXthere 's470VBZbe another471DTanother serious472JJserious problem473NNproblem ,474,, and475CCand that476DTthat 's477VBZbe the478DTthe parents479NNSparent are480VBPbe not481RBnot taxpayers482NNStaxpayer .483SENT. Taxpayers484NNStaxpayer are485VBPbe the486DTthe people487NNSpeople who488WPwho contribute489VVPcontribute to490TOto these491DTthese student492NNstudent scholarship493NNscholarship organizations494NNSorganization .495SENT. And496CCand this497DTthis Court498NPCourt has499VHZhave held500VVNhold that501IN/thatthat there502EXthere is503VBZbe no504DTno standing505NNstanding to506TOto challenge507VVchallenge somebody508NNsomebody else509RBelse 's510POS's tax511NNtax status512NNstatus .513SENT. It514PPit seems515VVZseem to516TOto me517PPme that518IN/thatthat the519DTthe Court520NPCourt 's521POS's decision522NNdecision in523INin Eastern524NPEastern Kentucky525NPKentucky is526VBZbe very527RBvery close528JJclose to529TOto this530DTthis one531CDone ,532,, and533CCand the534DTthe Court535NPCourt said536VVDsay you537PPyou say538VVPsay you539PPyou 're540VBPbe injured541VVNinjure because542INbecause these543DTthese hospitals544NNShospital are545VBPbe not546RBnot providing547VVGprovide ...548:... providing549VVGprovide services550NNSservice to551TOto you552PPyou ,553,, but554CCbut you555PPyou are556VBPbe not557RBnot the558DTthe taxpayer559NNtaxpayer and560CCand you561PPyou can562MDcan 't563RB't complain564VVPcomplain about565INabout the566DTthe tax567NNtax treatment568NNtreatment of569INof someone570NNsomeone else571RBelse .572SENT. So573RBso how574WRBhow do575VVPdo you576PPyou distinguish577VVdistinguish Eastern578NPEastern Kentucky579NPKentucky ?580SENT? [MR. KOMER]581LOC[MR. KOMER] Well582UHWell ,583,, Your584PP$your Honor585NPHonor ,586,, here587RBhere what588WPwhat 's589VBZbe involved590VVNinvolve is591VBZbe a592DTa scholarship593NNscholarship program594NNprogram ,595,, and596CCand the597DTthe scholarship598NNscholarship program599NNprogram 's600POS's intended601JJintended beneficiaries602NNSbeneficiary are603VBPbe the604DTthe parents605NNSparent ,606,, like607INlike our608PP$our clients609NNSclient ,610,, who611WPwho are612VBPbe enabled613VVNenable to614TOto exercise615VVexercise their616PP$their constitutional617JJconstitutional right618NNright to619TOto choose620VVchoose ...621:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]622LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] They623PPthey 're624VBPbe challenging625VVGchallenge the626DTthe tax627NNtax status628NNstatus of629INof someone630NNsomeone else631RBelse ,632,, not633RBnot themselves634PPthemselves .635SENT. [MR. KOMER]636LOC[MR. KOMER] No637NPNo ...638:... no639UHno ,640,, Your641PP$your Honor642NPHonor ,643,, it644PPit 's645VBZbe because646INbecause the647DTthe Montana648NPMontana Supreme649NPSupreme Court650NPCourt has651VHZhave extended652VVNextend their653PP$their Blaine654NPBlaine Amendment655NPAmendment to656TOto include657VVinclude scholarships658NNSscholarship that659WDTthat are660VBPbe generated661VVNgenerate by662INby the663DTthe giving664NNgiving of665INof tax666NNtax credits667NNScredit ...668:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]669LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I670PPI 'm671VBPbe sorry672JJsorry .673SENT. Is674VBZbe there675RBthere any676DTany case677NNcase we678PPwe 've679VHPhave ever680RBever had681VHNhave where682WRBwhere we683PPwe 've684VHPhave recognized685VVNrecognize a686DTa tax687NNtax ...688:... a689DTa ...690:... a691DTa party692NNparty who693WPwho was694VBDbe n't695RBn't either696RBeither the697DTthe taxpayer698NNtaxpayer or699CCor the700DTthe direct701JJdirect recipient702NNrecipient of703INof the704DTthe taxes705NNStaxis ,706,, benefits707NNSbenefit of708INof the709DTthe taxes710NNStaxis ?711SENT? So712RBso here713RBhere the714DTthe parents715NNSparent not716RBnot just717RBjust are718VBPbe n't719RBn't the720DTthe taxpayer721NNtaxpayer ;722:; they723PPthey 're724VBPbe not725RBnot the726DTthe schools727NNSschool that728WDTthat receive729VVPreceive the730DTthe money731NNmoney .732SENT. Neither733CCneither are734VBPbe they735PPthey guaranteed736VVNguarantee receipt737NNreceipt of738INof the739DTthe money740NNmoney .741SENT. We742PPwe 're743VBPbe told744VVNtell that745IN/thatthat there746EXthere 's747VBZbe less748JJRless money749NNmoney than750INthan applicants751NNSapplicant .752SENT. So753RBso they754PPthey 're755VBPbe like756INlike three757CDthree levels758NNSlevel removed759VVNremove .760SENT. In761INin what762WPwhat other763JJother case764NNcase can765MDcan you766PPyou cite767VVcite for768INfor me769PPme have770VHPhave we771PPwe permitted772VVDpermit such773PDTsuch a774DTa removed775VVNremove party776NNparty to777TOto have778VHhave standing779NNstanding ?780SENT? [MR. KOMER]781LOC[MR. KOMER] I782PPI ...783:... Your784PP$your Honor785NPHonor ,786,, I787PPI do788VVPdo n't789RBn't think790VVthink that791IN/thatthat we792PPwe 've793VHPhave had794VHDhave a795DTa state796NNstate constitutional797JJconstitutional provision798NNprovision ever799RBever be800VBbe applied801VVNapply in802INin such803PDTsuch a804DTa ...805:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]806LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] It807PPit does808VVZdo n't809RBn't matter810VVmatter that811DTthat ...812:... [MR. KOMER]813LOC[MR. KOMER] ...814:... extended815JJextended fashion816NNfashion .817SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]818LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...819:... we820PPwe 've821VHPhave had822VHDhave ...823:... we824PPwe 've825VHPhave had826VHDhave a827DTa case828NNcase involving829VVGinvolve schools830NNSschool that831WDTthat discriminate832VVPdiscriminate ,833,, and834CCand we835PPwe 've836VHPhave said837VVNsay that838IN/thatthat those839DTthose schools840NNSschool ...841:... that842DTthat taxpayers843NNStaxpayer ...844:... not845RBnot taxpayers846NNStaxpayer ...847:... that848IN/thatthat individuals849NNSindividual who850WPwho feel851VVPfeel affected852VVNaffect by853INby that854DTthat discrimination855NNdiscrimination do856VVPdo n't857RBn't have858VHhave standing859NNstanding because860INbecause they861PPthey 're862VBPbe not863RBnot the864DTthe people865NNSpeople ...866:... they867PPthey 're868VBPbe not869RBnot the870DTthe taxpayer871NNtaxpayer and872CCand they873PPthey 're874VBPbe not875RBnot the876DTthe recipient877NNrecipient of878INof the879DTthe discrimination880NNdiscrimination directly881RBdirectly ,882,, so883RBso ...884:... and885CCand I'm886NPI'm ...887:... I888PPI 'm889VBPbe having890VHGhave a891DTa problem892NNproblem understanding893NNunderstanding how894WRBhow you895PPyou have896VHPhave standing897NNstanding either898CCeither for899INfor the900DTthe taxpayer901NNtaxpayer or902CCor for903INfor the904DTthe school905NNschool who906WPwho receives907VVZreceive the908DTthe money909NNmoney .910SENT. [MR. KOMER]911LOC[MR. KOMER] Well912UHWell ...913:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]914LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] And915CCand why916NNwhy ...917:... you918PPyou have919VHPhave a920DTa lot921NNlot of922INof contingencies923NNScontingency .924SENT. Other925JJother ...926:... that927IN/thatthat taxpayers928NNStaxpayer won929MDwill 't930RB't give931VVgive the932DTthe $933$$ 150934CD@card@ without935INwithout the936DTthe tax937NNtax credit938NNcredit ,939,, that940IN/thatthat the941DTthe school942NNschool will943MDwill actually944RBactually pick945VVpick them946PPthem ,947,, and948CCand that949IN/thatthat even950RBeven if951INif picked952VVNpick in953INin the954DTthe past955NNpast ,956,, that957WDTthat they958PPthey 'll959MDwill be960VBbe picked961VVNpick in962INin the963DTthe future964NNfuture .965SENT. It966PPit seems967VVZseem a968DTa high969JJhigh level970NNlevel of971INof contingencies972NNScontingency .973SENT. So974RBso mention975VVmention one976CDone case977NNcase that978WDTthat comes979VVZcome close980NNclose to981TOto that982DTthat .983SENT. [MR. KOMER]984LOC[MR. KOMER] Any985DTany case986NNcase that987WDTthat involves988VVZinvolve Article989NPArticle III990NPIII standing991NNstanding where992WRBwhere the993DTthe intended994VVNintend beneficiaries995NNSbeneficiary of996INof the997DTthe program998NNprogram are999VBPbe ...1000:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1001LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] The1002DTthe school1003NNschool 's1004VBZbe the1005DTthe intended1006JJintended beneficiary1007NNbeneficiary .1008SENT. [MR. KOMER]1009LOC[MR. KOMER] I1010PPI ...1011:... I1012PPI ...1013:... respectfully1014RBrespectfully ,1015,, Your1016PP$your Honor1017NPHonor ,1018,, I1019PPI disagree1020VVPdisagree .1021SENT. The1022DTthe financial1023JJfinancial benefit1024NNbenefit from1025INfrom a1026DTa scholarship1027NNscholarship program1028NNprogram is1029VBZbe to1030TOto the1031DTthe families1032NNSfamily .1033SENT. The1034DTthe families1035NNSfamily receive1036VVPreceive the1037DTthe benefit1038NNbenefit of1039INof the1040DTthe scholarship1041NNscholarship .1042SENT. The1043DTthe scholarship1044NNscholarship is1045VBZbe used1046VVNuse by1047INby the1048DTthe families1049NNSfamily to1050TOto buy1051VVbuy the1052DTthe education1053NNeducation ...1054:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1055LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Counsel1056NPCounsel ...1057:... [MR. KOMER]1058LOC[MR. KOMER] ...1059:... at1060INat the1061DTthe school1062NNschool .1063SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1064LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...1065:... the1066DTthe financial1067JJfinancial benefit1068NNbenefit is1069VBZbe to1070TOto the1071DTthe taxpayer1072NNtaxpayer who1073WPwho gets1074VVZget a1075DTa tax1076NNtax credit1077NNcredit .1078SENT. [MR. KOMER]1079LOC[MR. KOMER] Actually1080RBactually ...1081:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1082LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That1083DTthat 's1084VBZbe the1085DTthe intent1086NNintent .1087SENT. It1088PPit 's1089VBZbe an1090DTan incentive1091NNincentive for1092INfor the1093DTthe taxpayer1094NNtaxpayer to1095TOto give1096VVgive money1097NNmoney ,1098,, but1099CCbut there1100EXthere are1101VBPbe many1102JJmany incentives1103NNSincentive that1104WDTthat incentivize1105VVPincentivize people1106NNSpeople to1107TOto give1108VVgive money1109NNmoney .1110SENT. [MR. KOMER]1111LOC[MR. KOMER] Yes1112NPYes ,1113,, Your1114PP$your Honor1115NPHonor ,1116,, it1117PPit does1118VVZdo incentivize1119VVincentivize donations1120NNSdonation .1121SENT. That1122DTthat 's1123VBZbe its1124PP$its purpose1125NNpurpose .1126SENT. And1127CCand it1128PPit actually1129RBactually succeeded1130VVDsucceed ,1131,, while1132INwhile the1133DTthe program1134NNprogram was1135VBDbe going1136VVGgo ,1137,, in1138INin awarding1139VVGaward scholarships1140NNSscholarship to1141TOto two1142CDtwo of1143INof our1144PP$our three1145CDthree client1146NNclient families1147NNSfamily .1148SENT. And1149CCand ...1150:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]1151LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] How1152WRBHow do1153VVPdo you1154PPyou know1155VVPknow that1156IN/thatthat they1157PPthey would1158MDwould n't1159RBn't have1160VHhave been1161VBNbe in1162INin the1163DTthe same1164JJsame situation1165NNsituation ?1166SENT? After1167INafter all1168PDTall this1169DTthis is1170VBZbe a1171DTa small1172JJsmall credit1173NNcredit .1174SENT. It1175PPit 's1176VBZbe $1177$$ 1501178CD@card@ .1179SENT. And1180CCand if1181INif they1182PPthey do1183VVPdo n't1184RBn't get1185VVget the1186DTthe credit1187NNcredit ,1188,, if1189INif the1190DTthe donors1191NNSdonor to1192TOto the1193DTthe organizations1194NNSorganization do1195VVPdo n't1196RBn't get1197VVget the1198DTthe credit1199NNcredit ,1200,, they1201PPthey still1202RBstill get1203VVPget a1204DTa tax1205NNtax deduction1206NNdeduction .1207SENT. And1208CCand that1209DTthat tax1210NNtax deduction1211NNdeduction is1212VBZbe uncapped1213VVNuncap .1214SENT. So1215RBso how1216WRBhow can1217MDcan we1218PPwe even1219RBeven assume1220VVPassume that1221IN/thatthat there1222EXthere 's1223VBZbe going1224VVGgo to1225TOto be1226VBbe less1227JJRless money1228NNmoney in1229INin the1230DTthe kitty1231NNkitty if1232INif the1233DTthe credit1234NNcredit is1235VBZbe removed1236VVNremove but1237CCbut the1238DTthe tax1239NNtax deduction1240NNdeduction remains1241VVZremain untouched1242JJuntouched ?1243SENT? And1244CCand I1245PPI 'm1246VBPbe looking1247VVGlook at1248INat Wright1249NPWright against1250INagainst Allen1251NPAllen in1252INin Eastern1253NPEastern Kentucky1254NPKentucky and1255CCand I1256PPI just1257RBjust do1258VVPdo n't1259RBn't understand1260VVunderstand how1261WRBhow this1262DTthis case1263NNcase passes1264VVZpass the1265DTthe standing1266NNstanding bar1267NNbar when1268WRBwhen those1269DTthose did1270VVDdo n't1271RBn't .1272SENT. [MR. KOMER]1273LOC[MR. KOMER] Well1274UHWell ,1275,, Your1276PP$your Honor1277NPHonor ,1278,, the1279DTthe simple1280JJsimple fact1281NNfact of1282INof the1283DTthe matter1284NNmatter is1285VBZbe that1286IN/thatthat our1287PP$our clients1288NNSclient received1289VVDreceive scholarships1290NNSscholarship under1291INunder this1292DTthis program1293NNprogram ,1294,, which1295WDTwhich was1296VBDbe a1297DTa financial1298JJfinancial benefit1299NNbenefit to1300TOto them1301PPthem .1302SENT. The1303DTthe ...1304:... the1305DTthe ...1306:... the1307DTthe tax1308NNtax deductions1309NNSdeduction are1310VBPbe not1311RBnot a1312DTa financial1313JJfinancial benefit1314NNbenefit to1315TOto the1316DTthe taxpayer1317NNtaxpayer because1318INbecause they1319PPthey are1320VBPbe out1321RBout $1322$$ 1501323CD@card@ ,1324,, whether1325INwhether they1326PPthey pay1327VVPpay their1328PP$their tax1329NNtax to1330TOto the1331DTthe state1332NNstate or1333CCor they1334PPthey donate1335VVPdonate $1336$$ 1501337CD@card@ to1338TOto the1339DTthe scholarship1340NNscholarship organization1341NNorganization .1342SENT. There1343EXthere 's1344VBZbe no1345DTno financial1346JJfinancial benefit1347NNbenefit to1348TOto them1349PPthem .1350SENT. It1351PPit 's1352VBZbe kind1353NNkind of1354INof a1355DTa psychic1356JJpsychic benefit1357NNbenefit .1358SENT. But1359CCbut it1360PPit creates1361VVZcreate scholarships1362NNSscholarship .1363SENT. It1364PPit really1365RBreally created1366VVDcreate scholarships1367NNSscholarship .1368SENT. And1369CCand ...1370:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]1371LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Mr1372NPMr .1373SENT. Komer1374NPKomer ,1375,, can1376MDcan I1377PPI go1378VVgo back1379RBback to1380TOto Justice1381NPJustice Ginsburg1382NPGinsburg 's1383POS's first1384JJfirst question1385NNquestion ?1386SENT? And1387CCand I1388PPI do1389VVPdo n't1390RBn't know1391VVknow whether1392INwhether to1393TOto call1394VVcall it1395PPit standing1396NNstanding or1397CCor mootness1398NNmootness or1399CCor anything1400NNanything else1401RBelse ,1402,, but1403CCbut I1404PPI guess1405VVPguess I1406PPI am1407VBPbe having1408VHGhave trouble1409JJtrouble seeing1410VVGsee where1411WRBwhere the1412DTthe harm1413NNharm in1414INin this1415DTthis case1416NNcase is1417VBZbe at1418INat this1419DTthis point1420NNpoint .1421SENT. It1422PPit 's1423VBZbe a1424DTa strange1425JJstrange kind1426NNkind of1427INof posture1428NNposture wherein1429RBwherein ,1430,, but1431CCbut if1432INif you1433PPyou would1434MDwould describe1435VVdescribe to1436TOto me1437PPme what1438WPwhat is1439VBZbe the1440DTthe harm1441NNharm that1442IN/thatthat the1443DTthe parents1444NNSparent are1445VBPbe suffering1446VVGsuffer right1447RBright now1448RBnow currently1449RBcurrently ?1450SENT? [MR. KOMER]1451LOC[MR. KOMER] Well1452UHWell ,1453,, right1454RBright now1455RBnow ,1456,, their1457PP$their students1458NNSstudent ...1459:... two1460CDtwo of1461INof the1462DTthe families1463NNSfamily '1464POS' students1465NNSstudent are1466VBPbe on1467INon scholarships1468NNSscholarship and1469CCand next1470JJnext year1471NNyear they1472PPthey won1473MDwill 't1474RB't be1475VBbe ...1476:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]1477LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Right1478RBright .1479SENT. But1480CCbut I1481PPI guess1482VVPguess ...1483:... [MR. KOMER]1484LOC[MR. KOMER] ...1485:... generated1486VVNgenerate by1487INby the1488DTthe program1489NNprogram .1490SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]1491LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] I1492PPI 'm1493VBPbe sorry1494JJsorry to1495TOto interrupt1496VVinterrupt .1497SENT. I1498PPI guess1499VVPguess what1500WPwhat I'm1501NNI'm ...1502:... I1503PPI 'm1504VBPbe saying1505VVGsay is1506VBZbe that1507IN/thatthat because1508INbecause of1509INof the1510DTthe supreme1511JJsupreme court1512NNcourt 's1513POS's ruling1514NNruling ,1515,, whether1516INwhether you1517PPyou go1518VVPgo to1519TOto a1520DTa religious1521JJreligious school1522NNschool or1523CCor you1524PPyou go1525VVPgo to1526TOto a1527DTa secular1528JJsecular private1529JJprivate school1530NNschool ,1531,, you1532PPyou 're1533VBPbe in1534INin the1535DTthe same1536JJsame boat1537NNboat at1538INat this1539DTthis point1540NNpoint .1541SENT. So1542RBso I1543PPI 've1544VHPhave always1545RBalways understood1546VVNunderstand in1547INin these1548DTthese kinds1549NNSkind of1550INof cases1551NNScase that1552IN/thatthat the1553DTthe harm1554NNharm is1555VBZbe the1556DTthe perceived1557VVNperceive or1558CCor alleged1559VVNallege or1560CCor actual1561JJactual ...1562:... whatever1563WDTwhatever you1564PPyou want1565VVPwant to1566TOto call1567VVcall it1568PPit ...1569:... discrimination1570NNdiscrimination .1571SENT. But1572CCbut there1573EXthere is1574VBZbe no1575DTno discrimination1576NNdiscrimination at1577INat this1578DTthis point1579NNpoint going1580VVGgo on1581INon ,1582,, is1583VBZbe there1584RBthere ?1585SENT? [MR. KOMER]1586LOC[MR. KOMER] Yes1587NPYes ,1588,, there1589EXthere is1590VBZbe .1591SENT. Because1592INbecause the1593DTthe discrimination1594NNdiscrimination occurred1595VVDoccur in1596INin the1597DTthe judgment1598NNjudgment of1599INof the1600DTthe Montana1601NPMontana Supreme1602NPSupreme Court1603NPCourt which1604WDTwhich considered1605VVDconsider a1606DTa federal1607JJfederal question1608NNquestion ,1609,, which1610WDTwhich led1611VVDlead to1612TOto the1613DTthe invalidation1614NNinvalidation of1615INof the1616DTthe program1617NNprogram .1618SENT. And1619CCand they1620PPthey ...1621:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]1622LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But1623CCbut it1624PPit led1625VVDlead to1626TOto the1627DTthe invalidation1628NNinvalidation of1629INof the1630DTthe entire1631JJentire program1632NNprogram as1633INas it1634PPit related1635VVDrelate both1636DTboth to1637TOto private1638JJprivate secular1639JJsecular schools1640NNSschool and1641CCand private1642JJprivate religious1643JJreligious schools1644NNSschool .1645SENT. So1646RBso a1647DTa ...1648:... a1649DTa ...1650:... a1651DTa ...1652:... a1653DTa ...1654:... the1655DTthe parents1656NNSparent of1657INof both1658CCboth are1659VBPbe affected1660VVNaffect in1661INin the1662DTthe exact1663JJexact same1664JJsame way1665NNway .1666SENT. [MR. KOMER]1667LOC[MR. KOMER] That1668DTthat 's1669VBZbe because1670INbecause the1671DTthe remedy1672NNremedy ...1673:... you1674PPyou can1675MDcan 't1676RB't let1677VVlet the1678DTthe remedy1679NNremedy shield1680VVshield the1681DTthe discriminatory1682JJdiscriminatory judgment1683NNjudgment .1684SENT. The1685DTthe discriminatory1686JJdiscriminatory judgment1687NNjudgment is1688VBZbe in1689INin mistakenly1690RBmistakenly believing1691VVGbelieve that1692IN/thatthat this1693DTthis Blaine1694NPBlaine Amendment1695NPAmendment and1696CCand the1697DTthe application1698NNapplication of1699INof it1700PPit did1701VVDdo not1702RBnot violate1703VVviolate the1704DTthe Federal1705NPFederal Constitution1706NPConstitution .1707SENT. If1708INif they1709PPthey got1710VVDget that1711IN/thatthat question1712NNquestion right1713NNright ,1714,, we1715PPwe would1716MDwould n't1717RBn't be1718VBbe here1719RBhere .1720SENT. Because1721INbecause the1722DTthe program1723NNprogram would1724MDwould still1725RBstill be1726VBbe going1727VVGgo on1728INon and1729CCand our1730PP$our parents1731NNSparent would1732MDwould be1733VBbe ...1734:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1735LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I1736PPI 'm1737VBPbe sorry1738JJsorry ,1739,, how1740WRBhow could1741MDcould that1742RBthat be1743VBbe ?1744SENT? Meaning1745NNmeaning ,1746,, do1747VVdo you1748PPyou ...1749:... are1750VBPbe you1751PPyou taking1752VVGtake the1753DTthe position1754NNposition that1755IN/thatthat as1756INas a1757DTa matter1758NNmatter of1759INof constitutional1760JJconstitutional law1761NNlaw ,1762,, the1763DTthe Montana1764NPMontana Supreme1765NPSupreme Court1766NPCourt constitutional1767JJconstitutional provision1768NNprovision is1769VBZbe unconstitutional1770JJunconstitutional ?1771SENT? That1772DTthat ...1773:... that1774IN/thatthat states1775NNSstate are1776VBPbe forced1777VVNforce to1778TOto give1779VVgive money1780NNmoney ,1781,, tax1782NNtax credits1783NNScredit ,1784,, to1785TOto religious1786JJreligious institutions1787NNSinstitution and1788CCand secular1789JJsecular institutions1790NNSinstitution ?1791SENT? Are1792VBPbe they1793PPthey required1794VVNrequire always1795RBalways to1796TOto give1797VVgive money1798NNmoney out1799RBout ,1800,, scholarships1801NNSscholarship ?1802SENT? [MR. KOMER]1803LOC[MR. KOMER] No1804NPNo .1805SENT. No1806UHNo ,1807,, Your1808PP$your Honor1809NPHonor .1810SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1811LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] All1812DTall right1813NNright .1814SENT. So1815RBso let1816VVlet 's1817VBZbe start1818VVstart there1819RBthere .1820SENT. Are1821VBPbe you1822PPyou saying1823VVGsay that1824IN/thatthat the1825DTthe constitutional1826JJconstitutional ...1827:... the1828DTthe constitution1829NNconstitution is1830VBZbe unconstitutional1831JJunconstitutional ?1832SENT? Meaning1833VVGmean that1834IN/thatthat the1835DTthe constitutional1836JJconstitutional ...1837:... Montana1838NPMontana 's1839POS's constitutional1840JJconstitutional provision1841NNprovision is1842VBZbe unconstitutional1843JJunconstitutional .1844SENT. [MR. KOMER]1845LOC[MR. KOMER] Montana1846NPMontana 's1847POS's constitutional1848JJconstitutional provision1849NNprovision violates1850VVZviolate the1851DTthe free-exercise1852NNfree-exercise clause1853NNclause on1854INon its1855PP$its face1856NNface .1857SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1858LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] On1859INon its1860PP$its face1861NNface .1862SENT. [MR. KOMER]1863LOC[MR. KOMER] And1864CCand as1865RBas applied1866VVNapply to1867TOto this1868DTthis program1869NNprogram .1870SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1871LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So1872INso you1873PPyou are1874VBPbe saying1875VVGsay that1876IN/thatthat states1877NNSstate are1878VBPbe forced1879VVNforce to1880TOto give1881VVgive money1882NNmoney both1883CCboth to1884TOto secular1885JJsecular and1886CCand religious1887JJreligious schools1888NNSschool ?1889SENT? [MR. KOMER]1890LOC[MR. KOMER] It1891PPit ...1892:... not1893RBnot to1894TOto the1895DTthe schools1896NNSschool .1897SENT. This1898DTthis is1899VBZbe a1900DTa case1901NNcase about1902INabout giving1903VVGgive the1904DTthe money1905NNmoney to1906TOto the1907DTthe families1908NNSfamily .1909SENT. It1910PPit 's1911VBZbe not1912RBnot a1913DTa case1914NNcase about1915RBabout ...1916:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1917LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I1918PPI do1919VVPdo n't1920RBn't ...1921:... [MR. KOMER]1922LOC[MR. KOMER] ...1923:... giving1924VVGgive money1925NNmoney to1926TOto the1927DTthe schools1928NNSschool .1929SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1930LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Secular1931JJsecular and1932CCand religious1933JJreligious families1934NNSfamily ?1935SENT? [MR. KOMER]1936LOC[MR. KOMER] Yes1937NPYes ,1938,, if1939INif they1940PPthey give1941VVPgive to1942TOto one1943CDone ,1944,, they1945PPthey must1946MDmust give1947VVgive to1948TOto the1949DTthe other1950JJother .1951SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1952LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But1953CCbut can1954MDcan the1955DTthe state1956NNstate choose1957VVchoose not1958RBnot to1959TOto give1960VVgive at1961INat all1962DTall ?1963SENT? [MR. KOMER]1964LOC[MR. KOMER] Yes1965NPYes .1966SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1967LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] All1968DTall right1969NNright .1970SENT. So1971RBso let1972VVNlet 's1973VBZbe ...1974:... if1975INif you1976PPyou start1977VVPstart from1978INfrom that1979DTthat proposition1980NNproposition ,1981,, the1982DTthe Montana1983NPMontana court1984NNcourt said1985VVDsay we1986PPwe do1987VVPdo n't1988RBn't have1989VHhave a1990DTa law1991NNlaw now1992RBnow ,1993,, do1994VVPdo n't1995RBn't give1996VVgive to1997TOto any1998DTany .1999SENT. So2000RBso let2001VVlet 's2002VBZbe assume2003VVassume that2004IN/thatthat the2005DTthe Montana2006NPMontana court2007NNcourt did2008VVDdo what2009WPwhat you2010PPyou wanted2011VVDwant it2012PPit to2013TOto do2014VVdo and2015CCand said2016VVDsay :2017:: This2018DTthis is2019VBZbe unconstitutional2020JJunconstitutional under2021INunder the2022DTthe Federal2023NPFederal Constitution2024NPConstitution ,2025,, and2026CCand it2027PPit 's2028VBZbe unconstitutional2029JJunconstitutional under2030INunder the2031DTthe Montana2032NPMontana Constitution2033NPConstitution ,2034,, which2035WDTwhich is2036VBZbe what2037WPwhat I2038PPI think2039VVPthink it2040PPit did2041VVDdo ,2042,, by2043INby the2044DTthe way2045NNway .2046SENT. It2047PPit said2048VVDsay it2049PPit 's2050VBZbe unconstitutional2051JJunconstitutional under2052INunder both2053DTboth ,2054,, even2055RBeven if2056INif it2057PPit did2058VVDdo n't2059RBn't say2060VVsay it2061PPit ,2062,, but2063CCbut let2064VVlet 's2065VBZbe assume2066VVassume it2067PPit .2068SENT. Let2069VVlet 's2070VBZbe assume2071VVassume it2072PPit says2073VVZsay it2074PPit 's2075VBZbe unconstitutional2076JJunconstitutional under2077INunder the2078DTthe federal2079JJfederal constitution2080NNconstitution .2081SENT. You2082PPyou 're2083VBPbe saying2084VVGsay they2085PPthey can2086MDcan 't2087RB't say2088VVPsay separately2089RBseparately it2090PPit 's2091VBZbe unconstitutional2092JJunconstitutional under2093INunder the2094DTthe Montana2095NPMontana Constitution2096NPConstitution ?2097SENT? They2098PPthey have2099VHPhave to2100TOto keep2101VVkeep the2102DTthe program2103NNprogram alive2104RBalive ?2105SENT? [MR. KOMER]2106LOC[MR. KOMER] In2107INin the2108DTthe circumstances2109NNScircumstance we2110PPwe 're2111VBPbe dealing2112VVGdeal with2113INwith ,2114,, Your2115PP$your Honor2116NPHonor ,2117,, they2118PPthey terminated2119VVDterminate the2120DTthe program2121NNprogram .2122SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2123LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I2124PPI 'm2125VBPbe not2126RBnot talking2127VVGtalk about2128INabout the2129DTthe circumstances2130NNScircumstance .2131SENT. Let2132VVlet 's2133VBZbe assume2134VVassume their2135PP$their opinion2136NNopinion was2137VBDbe written2138VVNwrite exactly2139RBexactly the2140DTthe way2141NNway you2142PPyou want2143VVPwant it2144PPit to2145TOto be2146VBbe ,2147,, and2148CCand they2149PPthey had2150VHDhave said2151VVNsay ,2152,, this2153DTthis violates2154VVZviolate the2155DTthe Federal2156NPFederal Constitution2157NPConstitution ,2158,, but2159CCbut it2160PPit also2161RBalso violates2162VVZviolate the2163DTthe Montana2164NPMontana Constitution2165NPConstitution .2166SENT. So2167RBso instead2168RBinstead of2169INof leveling2170VVGlevel up2171RPup the2172DTthe way2173NNway Justice2174NPJustice Ginsburg2175NPGinsburg said2176VVDsay ,2177,, we2178PPwe 're2179VBPbe going2180VVGgo to2181TOto level2182VVlevel down2183RPdown .2184SENT. That2185DTthat way2186NNway it2187PPit does2188VVZdo n't2189RBn't violate2190VVviolate either2191RBeither of2192INof them2193PPthem .2194SENT. It2195PPit ...2196:... we2197PPwe stopped2198VVDstop the2199DTthe federal2200JJfederal violation2201NNviolation because2202INbecause we2203PPwe 're2204VBPbe not2205RBnot discriminating2206VVGdiscriminate against2207INagainst the2208DTthe school2209NNschool ...2210:... any2211DTany school2212NNschool .2213SENT. And2214CCand we2215PPwe 've2216VHPhave now2217RBnow ...2218:... not2219RBnot violating2220VVGviolate the2221DTthe Colorado2222NPColorado Constitution2223NPConstitution .2224SENT. Can2225MDcan they2226PPthey do2227VVdo that2228DTthat ?2229SENT? [MR. KOMER]2230LOC[MR. KOMER] Are2231VBPbe we2232PPwe talking2233VVGtalk about2234INabout the2235DTthe court2236NNcourt doing2237VVGdo this2238DTthis or2239CCor ...2240:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2241LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] To2242TOTo the2243DTthe court2244NNcourt doing2245VVGdo this2246DTthis .2247SENT. [MR. KOMER]2248LOC[MR. KOMER] Can2249MDcan the2250DTthe court2251NNcourt do2252VVPdo it2253PPit ,2254,, no2255UHno ?2256SENT? [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2257LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Why2258NPWhy ?2259SENT? [MR. KOMER]2260LOC[MR. KOMER] Because2261INbecause when2262WRBwhen you2263PPyou have2264VHPhave a2265DTa constitutional2266JJconstitutional conflict2267NNconflict between2268INbetween the2269DTthe two2270CDtwo constitutions2271NNSconstitution ,2272,, the2273DTthe Federal2274NPFederal Constitution2275NPConstitution trumps2276NNStrump ...2277:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2278LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But2279CCbut you2280PPyou just2281RBjust told2282VVDtell me2283PPme the2284DTthe Federal2285NPFederal Constitution2286NPConstitution does2287VVZdo n't2288RBn't stop2289VVstop the2290DTthe state2291NNstate from2292INfrom choosing2293VVGchoose not2294RBnot to2295TOto give2296VVgive aid2297NNaid .2298SENT. [MR. KOMER]2299LOC[MR. KOMER] That2300DTthat 's2301VBZbe right2302JJright .2303SENT. But2304CCbut here2305RBhere the2306DTthe state2307NNstate chose2308VVDchoose to2309TOto give2310VVgive aid2311NNaid and2312CCand it2313PPit has2314VHZhave been2315VBNbe stopped2316VVNstop from2317INfrom giving2318VVGgive aid2319NNaid to2320TOto our2321PP$our clients2322NNSclient .2323SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]2324LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well2325UHwell ,2326,, it2327PPit chose2328VVDchoose to2329TOto give2330VVgive aid2331NNaid consistent2332JJconsistent with2333INwith the2334DTthe constitutional2335JJconstitutional amendment2336NNamendment .2337SENT. And2338CCand ...2339:... and2340CCand ...2341:... and2342CCand the2343DTthe constitutional2344JJconstitutional amendment2345NNamendment sets2346VVZset restrictions2347NNSrestriction on2348INon funds2349NNSfund .2350SENT. And2351CCand ,2352,, as2353INas a2354DTa result2355NNresult of2356INof the2357DTthe restrictions2358NNSrestriction on2359INon funds2360NNSfund that2361IN/thatthat the2362DTthe constitutional2363JJconstitutional amendment2364NNamendment set2365NNset ,2366,, in2367INin this2368DTthis case2369NNcase ,2370,, which2371WDTwhich I2372PPI have2373VHPhave always2374RBalways understood2375VVNunderstand to2376TOto be2377VBbe a2378DTa challenge2379NNchallenge to2380TOto the2381DTthe way2382NNway that2383IN/thatthat the2384DTthe constitutional2385JJconstitutional amendment2386NNamendment operated2387VVNoperate on2388INon a2389DTa particular2390JJparticular program2391NNprogram ,2392,, as2393INas a2394DTa result2395NNresult of2396INof this2397DTthis challenge2398NNchallenge ,2399,, what2400WPwhat has2401VHZhave happened2402VVNhappen is2403VBZbe that2404IN/thatthat neither2405CCneither the2406DTthe parents2407NNSparent who2408WPwho want2409VVPwant to2410TOto send2411VVsend their2412PP$their children2413NNSchild to2414TOto religious2415JJreligious schools2416NNSschool nor2417CCnor the2418DTthe parents2419NNSparent who2420WPwho want2421VVPwant to2422TOto send2423VVsend their2424PP$their children2425NNSchild to2426TOto secular2427JJsecular schools2428NNSschool get2429VVPget what2430WPwhat they2431PPthey would2432MDwould like2433VVlike to2434TOto get2435VVget .2436SENT. So2437RBso they2438PPthey 're2439VBPbe both2440CCboth being2441VBGbe treated2442VVNtreat the2443DTthe same2444JJsame way2445NNway .2446SENT. [MR. KOMER]2447LOC[MR. KOMER] Only2448RBonly as2449INas a2450DTa result2451NNresult of2452INof a2453DTa mistaken2454JJmistaken understanding2455NNunderstanding of2456INof the2457DTthe free-exercise2458NNfree-exercise clause2459NNclause ,2460,, Your2461PP$your Honor2462NPHonor .2463SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]2464LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Under2465INunder ...2466:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]2467LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But2468CCbut we2469PPwe do2470VVPdo n't2471RBn't usually2472RBusually ...2473:... [JUSTICE ALITO]2474LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] ...2475:... under2476INunder ...2477:... go2478VVgo ahead2479RBahead .2480SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]2481LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] I2482PPI mean2483VVPmean ,2484,, we2485PPwe do2486VVPdo n't2487RBn't usually2488RBusually sort2489VVsort of2490INof grade2491NNgrade every2492DTevery line2493NNline of2494INof an2495DTan opinion2496NNopinion .2497SENT. Usually2498RBusually we2499PPwe look2500VVPlook to2501TOto an2502DTan opinion2503NNopinion ,2504,, and2505CCand ...2506:... and2507CCand ...2508:... and2509CCand ...2510:... and2511CCand there2512EXthere 's2513VBZbe a2514DTa decision2515NNdecision below2516RBbelow ,2517,, and2518CCand it2519PPit 's2520VHZhave had2521VHNhave a2522DTa consequence2523NNconsequence in2524INin the2525DTthe world2526NNworld .2527SENT. And2528CCand the2529DTthe consequence2530NNconsequence of2531INof this2532DTthis decision2533NNdecision is2534VBZbe that2535IN/thatthat there2536EXthere is2537VBZbe no2538DTno discrimination2539NNdiscrimination ,2540,, that2541IN/thatthat neither2542DTneither ...2543:... that2544IN/thatthat neither2545DTneither set2546NNset of2547INof parents2548NNSparent is2549VBZbe getting2550VVGget what2551WPwhat it2552PPit ...2553:... they2554PPthey want2555VVPwant .2556SENT. Now2557RBnow ,2558,, you2559PPyou might2560MDmight say2561VVsay ,2562,, well2563RBwell ,2564,, both2565CCboth should2566MDshould get2567VVget what2568WPwhat they2569PPthey want2570VVPwant ,2571,, and2572CCand maybe2573RBmaybe that2574WDTthat would2575MDwould be2576VBbe a2577DTa better2578JJRgood world2579NNworld .2580SENT. Maybe2581RBmaybe .2582SENT. But2583CCbut the2584DTthe constitutional2585JJconstitutional harm2586NNharm that2587IN/thatthat it2588PPit seems2589VVZseem that2590IN/thatthat you2591PPyou have2592VHPhave to2593TOto allege2594VVallege here2595RBhere is2596VBZbe the2597DTthe discrimination2598NNdiscrimination .2599SENT. And2600CCand there2601EXthere is2602VBZbe no2603DTno discrimination2604NNdiscrimination .2605SENT. [MR. KOMER]2606LOC[MR. KOMER] Your2607PP$your Honor2608NPHonor ,2609,, there2610EXthere is2611VBZbe no2612DTno discrimination2613NNdiscrimination because2614INbecause the2615DTthe Montana2616NPMontana constitutional2617JJconstitutional provision2618NNprovision requires2619VVZrequire discrimination2620NNdiscrimination on2621INon its2622PP$its face2623NNface and2624CCand as2625RBas applied2626VVNapply to2627TOto our2628PP$our clients2629NNSclient .2630SENT. And2631CCand ,2632,, if2633INif I2634PPI can2635MDcan point2636VVpoint out2637RPout ,2638,, this2639DTthis is2640VBZbe n't2641RBn't a2642DTa decision2643NNdecision about2644INabout harmonizing2645VVGharmonize the2646DTthe two2647CDtwo constitutions2648NNSconstitution because2649INbecause the2650DTthe Montana2651NPMontana Supreme2652NPSupreme Court2653NPCourt did2654VVDdo not2655RBnot recognize2656VVrecognize there2657EXthere was2658VBDbe any2659DTany conflict2660NNconflict between2661INbetween them2662PPthem that2663WDTthat had2664VHDhave to2665TOto be2666VBbe harmonized2667VVNharmonize at2668INat all2669DTall .2670SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2671LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Justice2672NPJustice Alito2673NPAlito ?2674SENT? [JUSTICE ALITO]2675LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Yeah2676UHYeah ,2677,, I2678PPI just2679RBjust wanted2680VVDwant to2681TOto ask2682VVask this2683DTthis simple2684JJsimple question2685NNquestion :2686:: Under2687INunder our2688PP$our decision2689NNdecision in2690INin Village2691NPVillage of2692INof Arlington2693NPArlington Heights2694NPHeights ,2695,, is2696VBZbe it2697PPit constitutional2698JJconstitutional for2699INfor a2700DTa unit2701NNunit of2702INof state2703NNstate government2704NNgovernment to2705TOto do2706VVdo something2707NNsomething that2708IN/thatthat it2709PPit could2710MDcould do2711VVdo ,2712,, but2713CCbut if2714INif it2715PPit does2716VVZdo it2717PPit for2718INfor an2719DTan unconstitutional2720JJunconstitutional discriminatory2721JJdiscriminatory reason2722NNreason ,2723,, is2724VBZbe it2725PPit then2726RBthen unconstitutional2727JJunconstitutional ?2728SENT? [MR. KOMER]2729LOC[MR. KOMER] Yes2730NPYes ,2731,, it2732PPit is2733VBZbe ,2734,, Your2735PP$your Honor2736NPHonor .2737SENT. I2738PPI see2739VVPsee the2740DTthe light2741NNlight is2742VBZbe on2743INon .2744SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2745LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank2746VVthank you2747PPyou ,2748,, counsel2749NNcounsel .2750SENT. Mr2751NPMr .2752SENT. Wall2753NPWall .2754SENT.

[MR. WALL J.B.]2755LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Mr2756NPMr .2757SENT. Chief2758NPChief Justice2759NPJustice and2760CCand may2761MDmay it2762PPit please2763VVplease the2764DTthe Court2765NPCourt :2766:: The2767DTthe Montana2768NPMontana Supreme2769NPSupreme Court2770NPCourt held2771VVDhold that2772IN/thatthat the2773DTthe Montana2774NPMontana constitution2775NNconstitution requires2776VVZrequire religious2777JJreligious discrimination2778NNdiscrimination that2779IN/thatthat the2780DTthe federal2781JJfederal constitution2782NNconstitution forbids2783VVZforbid .2784SENT. Parents2785NNSparent may2786MDmay not2787RBnot direct2788VVdirect scholarships2789NNSscholarship to2790TOto schools2791NNSschool solely2792RBsolely because2793INbecause those2794DTthose schools2795NNSschool are2796VBPbe religiously2797RBreligiously affiliated2798VVNaffiliate .2799SENT. Now2800RBnow ,2801,, the2802DTthe state2803NNstate does2804VVZdo n't2805RBn't defend2806VVdefend that2807DTthat error2808NNerror of2809INof federal2810JJfederal law2811NNlaw ,2812,, but2813CCbut says2814VVZsay it2815PPit was2816VBDbe washed2817VVNwash away2818RBaway when2819WRBwhen the2820DTthe court2821NNcourt invalidated2822VVDinvalidate the2823DTthe entire2824JJentire program2825NNprogram and2826CCand left2827VVDleave everyone2828NNeveryone empty-handed2829JJempty-handed .2830SENT. The2831DTthe Montana2832NPMontana Supreme2833NPSupreme Court2834NPCourt had2835VHDhave no2836DTno power2837NNpower under2838INunder federal2839JJfederal law2840NNlaw to2841TOto invalidate2842VVinvalidate anything2843NNanything .2844SENT. It2845PPit relied2846VVDrely on2847INon a2848DTa state2849NNstate constitutional2850JJconstitutional provision2851NNprovision that2852WDTthat is2853VBZbe inconsistent2854JJinconsistent with2855INwith and2856CCand preempted2857VVNpreempt by2858INby the2859DTthe federal2860JJfederal free-exercise2861NNfree-exercise clause2862NNclause ,2863,, and2864CCand ,2865,, crucially2866RBcrucially ,2867,, Petitioners2868NNSpetitioner continue2869VVPcontinue to2870TOto suffer2871VVsuffer from2872INfrom that2873DTthat federal2874JJfederal free2875JJfree exercise2876NNexercise violation2877NNviolation regardless2878RBregardless of2879INof whether2880INwhether any2881DTany parents2882NNSparent received2883VVDreceive scholarships2884NNSscholarship or2885CCor also2886RBalso suffer2887VVsuffer as2888INas collateral2889NNcollateral damage2890NNdamage .2891SENT. If2892INif the2893DTthe Montana2894NPMontana Supreme2895NPSupreme Court2896NPCourt had2897VHDhave invalidated2898VVNinvalidate this2899DTthis program2900NNprogram because2901INbecause it2902PPit included2903VVDinclude historically2904RBhistorically African-American2905NPAfrican-American schools2906NNSschool or2907CCor all-girl2908NNall-girl schools2909NNSschool ,2910,, that2911WDTthat would2912MDwould be2913VBbe a2914DTa straightforward2915JJstraightforward equal-protection2916NNequal-protection violation2917NNviolation .2918SENT. Nothing2919NNnothing about2920INabout it2921PPit would2922MDwould be2923VBbe cured2924VVNcure by2925INby the2926DTthe fact2927NNfact that2928IN/thatthat other2929JJother parents2930NNSparent had2931VHDhave been2932VBNbe denied2933VVNdeny funding2934VVGfund as2935RBas well2936RBwell .2937SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2938LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] So2939INso your2940PP$your ...2941:... your2942PP$your ...2943:... I2944PPI 'm2945VBPbe sorry2946JJsorry .2947SENT. Oh2948UHoh ,2949,, you2950PPyou 're2951VBPbe good2952JJgood .2953SENT. The2954DTthe injury2955NNinjury flows2956VVZflow through2957INthrough the2958DTthe schools2959NNSschool ,2960,, right2961RBright ?2962SENT? I2963PPI mean2964VVPmean ,2965,, the2966DTthe money2967NNmoney would2968MDwould go2969VVgo to2970TOto the2971DTthe schools2972NNSschool ,2973,, not2974RBnot to2975TOto the2976DTthe parents2977NNSparent .2978SENT. And2979CCand we2980PPwe do2981VVPdo n't2982RBn't have2983VHhave a2984DTa school2985NNschool in2986INin this2987DTthis case2988NNcase .2989SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]2990LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Well2991UHWell ,2992,, but2993CCbut I2994PPI think2995VVPthink that2996WDTthat 's2997VBZbe really2998RBreally getting2999VVGget at3000INat the3001DTthe standing3002NNstanding issue3003NNissue ,3004,, Mr3005NPMr .3006SENT. Chief3007NPChief Justice3008NPJustice .3009SENT. And3010CCand they3011PPthey 're3012VBPbe losing3013VVGlose their3014PP$their scholarships3015NNSscholarship at3016INat the3017DTthe end3018NNend of3019INof the3020DTthe school3021NNschool year3022NNyear ,3023,, as3024INas I3025PPI understand3026VVPunderstand it3027PPit .3028SENT. They3029PPthey 've3030VHPhave had3031VHDhave them3032PPthem for3033INfor years3034NNSyear ,3035,, and3036CCand under3037INunder the3038DTthe court3039NNcourt 's3040POS's decision3041NNdecision ,3042,, they3043PPthey lose3044VVPlose them3045PPthem at3046INat the3047DTthe end3048NNend of3049INof this3050DTthis school3051NNschool year3052NNyear .3053SENT. So3054RBso even3055RBeven I3056PPI do3057VVPdo n't3058RBn't take3059VVtake the3060DTthe state3061NNstate to3062TOto be3063VBbe challenging3064VVGchallenge Article3065NPArticle III3066NPIII injury3067NNinjury .3068SENT. And3069CCand so3070RBso then3071RBthen it3072PPit 's3073VBZbe just3074RBjust a3075DTa question3076NNquestion of3077INof whether3078INwhether they3079PPthey 're3080VBPbe raising3081VVGraise their3082PP$their own3083JJown rights3084NNSright and3085CCand they3086PPthey are3087VBPbe because3088INbecause the3089DTthe reason3090NNreason they3091PPthey 're3092VBPbe being3093VBGbe excluded3094VVNexclude from3095INfrom the3096DTthe program3097NNprogram ,3098,, everybody3099NNeverybody would3100MDwould say3101VVsay ,3102,, the3103DTthe answer3104NNanswer to3105TOto the3106DTthe question3107NNquestion ,3108,, why3109WRBwhy do3110VVPdo n't3111RBn't these3112DTthese parents3113NNSparent get3114VVPget their3115PP$their scholarships3116NNSscholarship ,3117,, because3118INbecause they3119PPthey want3120VVPwant to3121TOto direct3122VVdirect the3123DTthe scholarships3124NNSscholarship to3125TOto religious3126JJreligious schools3127NNSschool .3128SENT. Their3129PP$their free3130JJfree exercise3131NNexercise is3132VBZbe being3133VBGbe penalized3134VVNpenalize .3135SENT. They3136PPthey 're3137VBPbe not3138RBnot raising3139VVGraise a3140DTa right3141NNright on3142INon behalf3143NNbehalf of3144INof the3145DTthe state3146NNstate .3147SENT. Everybody3148NNEverybody concedes3149VVZconcede that3150IN/thatthat if3151INif all3152PDTall the3153DTthe parents3154NNSparent in3155INin this3156DTthis program3157NNprogram had3158VHDhave wanted3159VVNwant to3160TOto choose3161VVchoose secular3162JJsecular schools3163NNSschool ,3164,, there3165EXthere 'd3166MDwould be3167VBbe no3168DTno basis3169NNbasis for3170INfor the3171DTthe state3172NNstate 's3173POS's court3174NNcourt ruling3175NNruling .3176SENT. The3177DTthe scholarship3178NNscholarship program3179NNprogram would3180MDwould still3181RBstill exist3182VVexist .3183SENT. It3184PPit 's3185VBZbe only3186RBonly because3187INbecause some3188DTsome parents3189NNSparent said3190VVDsay I3191PPI want3192VVPwant to3193TOto send3194VVsend my3195PP$my kids3196NNSkid to3197TOto schools3198NNSschool like3199INlike Stillwater3200NPStillwater ,3201,, and3202CCand at3203INat that3204DTthat point3205NNpoint ,3206,, at3207INat page3208NNpage 303209CD@card@ of3210INof the3211DTthe Petition3212NNpetition Appendix3213NNAppendix|appendix ,3214,, the3215DTthe state3216NNstate supreme3217NNsupreme court3218NNcourt says3219VVZsay we3220PPwe have3221VHhave a3222DTa state3223NNstate constitutional3224JJconstitutional guarantee3225NNguarantee ,3226,, no3227DTno state3228NNstate funds3229NNSfund to3230TOto religious3231JJreligious schools3232NNSschool .3233SENT. That3234DTthat 's3235VBZbe what3236WPwhat it3237PPit says3238VVZsay .3239SENT. And3240CCand that3241DTthat 's3242VBZbe a3243DTa straightforward3244JJstraightforward violation3245NNviolation 73246CD7 of3247INof ...3248:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3249LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Mr3250NPMr .3251SENT. Wall3252NPWall ...3253:... [MR. WALL J.B.]3254LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] ...3255:... federal3256JJfederal law3257NNlaw .3258SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3259LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...3260:... are3261VBPbe you3262PPyou claiming3263VVGclaim that3264DTthat ...3265:... what3266WPwhat you3267PPyou 're3268VBPbe calling3269VVGcall Blaine3270NPBlaine amendments3271NNSamendment ,3272,, but3273CCbut that3274IN/thatthat the3275DTthe Montana3276NPMontana provision3277NNprovision and3278CCand all3279PDTall the3280DTthe other3281JJother states3282NNSstate that3283WDTthat have3284VHPhave one3285CDone ,3286,, that3287WDTthat as3288INas a3289DTa matter3290NNmatter of3291INof federal3292JJfederal constitutional3293JJconstitutional law3294NNlaw ,3295,, all3296RBall of3297INof those3298DTthose constitutional3299JJconstitutional ...3300:... state3301NNstate constitutional3302JJconstitutional provisions3303NNSprovision must3304MDmust be3305VBbe struck3306VVNstrike ?3307SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]3308LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Well3309UHWell ,3310,, not3311RBnot the3312DTthe entire3313JJentire category3314NNcategory because3315INbecause I3316PPI actually3317RBactually think3318VVPthink it3319PPit 's3320VBZbe a3321DTa little3322RBlittle more3323RBRmore nuanced3324JJnuanced than3325INthan that3326DTthat ,3327,, but3328CCbut I3329PPI am3330VBPbe saying3331VVGsay what3332WPwhat the3333DTthe Court3334NPCourt said3335VVDsay in3336INin Trinity3337NPTrinity Lutheran3338NPLutheran .3339SENT. Seven3340CDSeven members3341NNSmember of3342INof the3343DTthe Court3344NPCourt said3345VVDsay the3346DTthe free-exercise3347NNfree-exercise clause3348NNclause there3349RBthere compelled3350VVNcompel what3351WPwhat two3352CDtwo members3353NNSmember of3354INof the3355DTthe Court3356NPCourt said3357VVDsay in3358INin your3359PP$your dissent3360NNdissent ,3361,, Justice3362NPJustice Sotomayor3363NPSotomayor ,3364,, the3365DTthe Establishment3366NNestablishment Clause3367NNclause forbade3368VVDforbid .3369SENT. Yes3370UHyes ,3371,, we3372PPwe think3373VVPthink the3374DTthe same3375JJsame is3376VBZbe true3377JJtrue here3378RBhere .3379SENT. There3380EXthere are3381VBPbe ...3382:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3383LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That3384DTthat 's3385VBZbe a3386DTa radical3387JJradical decision3388NNdecision .3389SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]3390LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] I3391PPI ...3392:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3393LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] We3394PPwe have3395VHPhave ...3396:... we3397PPwe have3398VHPhave a3399DTa founding3400JJfounding father3401NNfather ,3402,, Madison3403NPMadison ,3404,, lobbying3405VVGlobby heavily3406RBheavily for3407INfor the3408DTthe free-exercise3409NNfree-exercise clause3410NNclause and3411CCand equally3412RBequally to3413TOto stop3414VVstop states3415NNSstate from3416INfrom both3417DTboth establishing3418VVGestablish religions3419NNSreligion or3420CCor using3421VVGuse public3422JJpublic funds3423NNSfund to3424TOto support3425VVsupport them3426PPthem .3427SENT. There3428EXthere 's3429VHZhave been3430VBNbe over3431INover ...3432:... since3433INsince the3434DTthe founding3435JJfounding fathers3436NNSfather ,3437,, a3438DTa long3439JJlong history3440NNhistory of3441INof people3442NNSpeople who3443WPwho for3444INfor non-discriminatory3445JJnon-discriminatory reasons3446NNSreason ,3447,, but3448CCbut for3449INfor reasons3450NNSreason related3451VVNrelate to3452TOto their3453PP$their belief3454NNbelief in3455INin the3456DTthe separation3457NNseparation of3458INof church3459NNchurch and3460CCand state3461NNstate ,3462,, that3463WDTthat have3464VHPhave taken3465VVNtake the3466DTthe position3467NNposition that3468IN/thatthat the3469DTthe state3470NNstate should3471MDshould not3472RBnot give3473VVgive money3474NNmoney to3475TOto religious3476JJreligious institutions3477NNSinstitution .3478SENT. You3479PPyou are3480VBPbe suggesting3481VVGsuggest now3482RBnow that3483IN/thatthat Montana3484NPMontana in3485RBin went3486VVDgo through3487INthrough an3488DTan empty3489JJempty exercise3490NNexercise ,3491,, they3492PPthey looked3493VVDlook at3494INat the3495DTthe history3496NNhistory of3497INof this3498DTthis amendment3499NNamendment or3500CCor one3501CDone like3502INlike it3503PPit ,3504,, said3505VVDsay it3506PPit was3507VBDbe odious3508JJodious ,3509,, admitted3510VVDadmit ...3511:... some3512DTsome of3513INof its3514PP$its people3515NNSpeople who3516WPwho voted3517VVDvote for3518INfor this3519DTthis bill3520NNbill in3521INin '3522''' 723523NP@card@ said3524VVDsay it3525PPit was3526VBDbe a3527DTa despicable3528JJdespicable history3529NNhistory ,3530,, but3531CCbut they3532PPthey then3533RBthen looked3534VVDlook at3535INat the3536DTthe founding3537JJfounding fathers3538NNSfather '3539POS' writings3540NNSwriting ,3541,, they3542PPthey looked3543VVDlook at3544INat the3545DTthe State3546NPState of3547INof Montana3548NPMontana 's3549POS's religious3550JJreligious tolerance3551NNtolerance ,3552,, which3553WDTwhich had3554VHDhave changed3555VVNchange dramatically3556RBdramatically from3557INfrom the3558DTthe Blaine3559NPBlaine Amendment3560NPAmendment era3561NNera ,3562,, and3563CCand decided3564VVDdecide that3565IN/thatthat they3566PPthey were3567VBDbe going3568VVGgo to3569TOto side3570NNside with3571INwith James3572NPJames Madison3573NPMadison ,3574,, one3575CDone of3576INof the3577DTthe fathers3578NNSfather of3579INof our3580PP$our Constitution3581NPConstitution ,3582,, and3583CCand continue3584VVPcontinue to3585TOto say3586VVsay we3587PPwe do3588VVPdo n't3589RBn't want3590VVwant aid3591NNaid to3592TOto churches3593NNSchurch .3594SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]3595LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So3596RBso ...3597:... so3598RBso ...3599:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3600LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Now3601RBnow ...3602:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3603LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Perhaps3604RBperhaps you3605PPyou could3606MDcould comment3607VVcomment ,3608,, counsel3609NNcounsel .3610SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]3611LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So3612RBso ,3613,, Justice3614NPJustice Sotomayor3615NPSotomayor ,3616,, that3617WDTthat was3618VBDbe one3619CDone of3620INof two3621CDtwo points3622NNSpoint I3623PPI was3624VBDbe hoping3625VVGhope to3626TOto make3627VVmake on3628INon the3629DTthe merits3630NNSmerit before3631INbefore I3632PPI sat3633VVDsit down3634RPdown .3635SENT. Every3636DTevery time3637NNtime that3638IN/thatthat the3639DTthe state3640NNstate points3641NNSpoint to3642TOto that3643DTthat in3644INin its3645PP$its brief3646NNbrief ,3647,, and3648CCand I3649PPI think3650VVPthink most3651RBSmost notably3652RBnotably at3653INat pages3654NNSpage 303655CD@card@ and3656CCand 313657CD@card@ ,3658,, and3659CCand what3660WPwhat Madison3661NPMadison was3662VBDbe talking3663VVGtalk about3664RBabout in3665INin the3666DTthe Remonstrance3667NNremonstrance were3668VBDbe compelled3669VVNcompel support3670NNsupport laws3671NNSlaw ,3672,, preferential3673JJpreferential aid3674NNaid to3675TOto the3676DTthe church3677NNchurch .3678SENT. Even3679RBeven the3680DTthe state3681NNstate admits3682VVZadmit at3683INat page3684NNpage 303685CD@card@ of3686INof their3687PP$their brief3688NNbrief ,3689,, and3690CCand these3691DTthese are3692VBPbe the3693DTthe state3694NNstate 's3695POS's words3696NNSword :3697:: There3698EXthere is3699VBZbe zero3700CDzero founding3701NNfounding era3702NNera evidence3703NNevidence that3704IN/thatthat there3705RBthere ...3706:... that3707IN/thatthat you3708PPyou could3709MDcould have3710VHhave a3711DTa generally3712RBgenerally available3713JJavailable benefit3714NNbenefit and3715CCand deny3716VVdeny it3717PPit to3718TOto an3719DTan institution3720NNinstitution based3721VVNbase on3722INon its3723PP$its religious3724JJreligious character3725NNcharacter ...3726:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3727LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] What3728WPWhat about3729RBabout ...3730:... what3731WPwhat about3732RBabout ...3733:... MR3734NPMr .3735SENT. WALL3736NNwall ...3737:... and3738CCand Justice3739NPJustice Thomas3740NPThomas ,3741,, I3742PPI think3743VVPthink ,3744,, walks3745VVZwalk through3746INthrough the3747DTthe history3748NNhistory of3749INof the3750DTthe opposite3751NNopposite in3752INin his3753PP$his Rosenberger3754NPRosenberger concurrence3755NNconcurrence ,3756,, that3757WDTthat at3758INat the3759DTthe time3760NNtime of3761INof the3762DTthe founding3763NNfounding ,3764,, when3765WRBwhen they3766PPthey gave3767VVDgive out3768RPout land3769NNland in3770INin the3771DTthe Northwest3772NPNorthwest Territory3773NPTerritory and3774CCand other3775JJother statutes3776NNSstatute for3777INfor ...3778:... to3779TOto schools3780NNSschool ,3781,, they3782PPthey included3783VVDinclude religiously3784RBreligiously affiliated3785JJaffiliated schools3786NNSschool .3787SENT. I3788PPI think3789VVPthink actually3790RBactually the3791DTthe tradition3792NNtradition that3793WDTthat dates3794VVZdate to3795TOto the3796DTthe founding3797NNfounding is3798VBZbe ...3799:... is3800VBZbe sort3801NNsort of3802INof the3803DTthe opposite3804NNopposite ,3805,, that3806WDTthat you3807PPyou can3808MDcan 't3809RB't disqualify3810VVdisqualify them3811PPthem just3812RBjust based3813VVNbase on3814INon their3815PP$their religious3816JJreligious character3817NNcharacter ,3818,, but3819CCbut you3820PPyou can3821MDcan have3822VHhave no3823DTno compelled3824VVNcompel support3825NNsupport ,3826,, no3827DTno preferential3828JJpreferential aid3829NNaid to3830TOto the3831DTthe church3832NNchurch .3833SENT. And3834CCand that3835DTthat 's3836VBZbe very3837RBvery different3838JJdifferent from3839INfrom what3840WPwhat ...3841:... what3842WPwhat 's3843VBZbe going3844VVGgo on3845INon here3846RBhere .3847SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]3848LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But3849CCbut what3850WPwhat ...3851:... what3852WPwhat did3853VVDdo you3854PPyou think3855VVPthink of3856INof this3857DTthis ?3858SENT? I3859PPI ...3860:... I3861PPI 'm3862VBPbe having3863VHGhave trouble3864NNtrouble ,3865,, and3866CCand I3867PPI want3868VVPwant you3869PPyou to3870TOto tell3871VVtell me3872PPme what3873WPwhat you3874PPyou really3875RBreally think3876VVPthink about3877INabout this3878DTthis problem3879NNproblem which3880WDTwhich has3881VHZhave probably3882RBprobably an3883DTan answer3884NNanswer that3885IN/thatthat you3886PPyou will3887MDwill have3888VHhave thought3889VVNthink about3890RBabout .3891SENT. Okay3892JJokay .3893SENT. Say3894VVsay in3895INin San3896NPSan Francisco3897NPFrancisco or3898CCor Boston3899NPBoston or3900CCor take3901VVtake any3902DTany city3903NNcity or3904CCor state3905NNstate ,3906,, and3907CCand they3908PPthey give3909VVPgive many3910JJmany ,3911,, many3912JJmany ,3913,, many3914JJmany millions3915NNSmillion of3916INof dollars3917NNSdollar to3918TOto the3919DTthe public3920JJpublic school3921NNschool system3922NNsystem .3923SENT. And3924CCand a3925DTa lot3926NNlot of3927INof them3928PPthem give3929VVPgive a3930DTa lot3931NNlot of3932INof money3933NNmoney to3934TOto charter3935NNcharter schools3936NNSschool .3937SENT. Now3938RBnow ,3939,, they3940PPthey do3941VVPdo n't3942RBn't give3943VVgive money3944NNmoney to3945TOto Catholic3946JJCatholic schools3947NNSschool .3948SENT. All3949DTall right3950NNright ?3951SENT? Now3952RBnow ,3953,, if3954INif ...3955:... if3956INif we3957PPwe decide3958VVPdecide you3959PPyou 're3960VBPbe right3961JJright ,3962,, does3963VVZdo that3964IN/thatthat all3965DTall change3966NNchange ?3967SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]3968LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Well3969UHWell ,3970,, no3971UHno ,3972,, in3973INin certain3974JJcertain respects3975NNSrespect it3976PPit does3977VVZdo n't3978RBn't change3979VVchange ,3980,, Justice3981NPJustice Breyer3982NPBreyer .3983SENT. They3984PPthey do3985VVPdo n't3986RBn't ...3987:... if3988INif they3989PPthey want3990VVPwant to3991TOto open3992VVopen up3993RPup the3994DTthe funding3995NNfunding ,3996,, they3997PPthey can3998MDcan put3999VVput limits4000NNSlimit ,4001,, secular4002JJsecular limits4003NNSlimit ,4004,, on4005INon the4006DTthe program4007NNprogram .4008SENT. We4009PPwe 're4010VBPbe going4011VVGgo to4012TOto give4013VVgive math4014NNmath scholarships4015NNSscholarship or4016CCor engineering4017NNengineering scholarships4018NNSscholarship ...4019:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4020LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] There's4021NPThere's ...4022:... I4023PPI 'm4024VBPbe not4025RBnot talking4026VVGtalk about4027INabout scholarships4028NNSscholarship .4029SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]4030LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] But4031CCbut if4032INif ...4033:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4034LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I4035PPI 'm4036VBPbe talking4037VVGtalk about4038INabout the4039DTthe X4040NPX billion4041CDbillion dollars4042NNSdollar that4043IN/thatthat the4044DTthe State4045NNstate of4046INof New4047NPNew York4048NPYork spends4049VVZspend on4050INon the4051DTthe public4052JJpublic school4053NNschool system4054NNsystem ,4055,, and4056CCand I4057PPI do4058VVPdo n't4059RBn't know4060VVknow how4061WRBhow much4062JJmuch ,4063,, but4064CCbut I4065PPI suspect4066VVPsuspect they4067PPthey might4068MDmight spend4069VVspend money4070NNmoney on4071INon charter4072NNcharter schools4073NNSschool .4074SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]4075LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Yes4076NPYes .4077SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]4078LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Let4079NPLet 's4080POS's call4081VVPcall it4082PPit another4083DTanother million4084CDmillion .4085SENT. They4086PPthey do4087VVPdo not4088RBnot ...4089:... I4090PPI 'm4091VBPbe just4092RBjust repeating4093VVGrepeat myself4094PPmyself ...4095:... [MR. WALL J.B.]4096LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Yes4097NPYes .4098SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]4099LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...4100:... spend4101VVspend money4102NNmoney on4103INon the4104DTthe Catholic4105JJCatholic school4106NNschool system4107NNsystem .4108SENT. Now4109RBnow ,4110,, there4111EXthere 's4112VBZbe nothing4113NNnothing immoral4114JJimmoral about4115INabout that4116DTthat .4117SENT. That4118DTthat 's4119VBZbe just4120RBjust the4121DTthe ...4122:... the4123DTthe ...4124:... what4125WPwhat they4126PPthey do4127VVPdo .4128SENT. And4129CCand ...4130:... and4131CCand that4132WDTthat 's4133VBZbe ...4134:... comes4135VVZcome from4136INfrom the4137DTthe Constitution4138NPConstitution .4139SENT. All4140DTall right4141NNright .4142SENT. If4143INif I4144PPI decide4145VVPdecide ...4146:... it4147PPit 's4148VBZbe the4149DTthe same4150JJsame question4151NNquestion .4152SENT. If4153INif I4154PPI decide4155VVPdecide for4156INfor you4157PPyou ,4158,, am4159VBPbe I4160PPI saying4161VVGsay that4162IN/thatthat they4163PPthey have4164VHPhave to4165TOto give4166VVgive money4167NNmoney to4168TOto the4169DTthe ...4170:... same4171JJsame amounts4172NNSamount proportionate4173VVPproportionate to4174TOto ...4175:... to4176TOto the4177DTthe parochial4178JJparochial school4179NNschool ?4180SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]4181LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] I4182PPI think4183VVPthink if4184INif they4185PPthey structure4186VVPstructure the4187DTthe benefit4188NNbenefit program4189NNprogram the4190DTthe way4191NNway they4192PPthey did4193VVDdo here4194RBhere or4195CCor the4196DTthe way4197NNway they4198PPthey did4199VVDdo in4200INin Trinity4201NPTrinity Lutheran4202NPLutheran ...4203:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4204LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No4205NPNo ,4206,, no4207RBno .4208SENT. I4209PPI 'm4210VBPbe saying4211VVGsay the4212DTthe way4213NNway ...4214:... [MR. WALL J.B.]4215LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] If4216INif ...4217:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4218LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...4219:... they4220PPthey do4221VVPdo do4222VVdo it4223PPit ,4224,, not4225RBnot the4226DTthe way4227NNway that4228IN/thatthat they4229PPthey did4230VVDdo it4231PPit here4232RBhere and4233CCand so4234RBso forth4235RBforth .4236SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]4237LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] If4238INif they4239PPthey are4240VBPbe giving4241VVGgive out4242RPout generally4243RBgenerally available4244JJavailable public4245JJpublic benefits4246NNSbenefit for4247INfor people4248NNSpeople to4249TOto go4250VVgo to4251TOto private4252JJprivate schools4253NNSschool ...4254:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4255LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Oh4256UHoh ,4257,, oh4258UHoh ,4259,, what4260WPwhat 's4261VBZbe the4262DTthe private4263JJprivate ?4264SENT? Why4265WRBwhy is4266VBZbe it4267PPit that4268IN/thatthat they4269PPthey have4270VHPhave to4271TOto be4272VBbe equal4273JJequal with4274INwith private4275JJprivate but4276CCbut they4277PPthey do4278VVPdo n't4279RBn't have4280VHhave to4281TOto be4282VBbe equal4283JJequal with4284INwith public4285NNpublic ?4286SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]4287LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] No4288NPNo ,4289,, when4290WRBwhen you4291PPyou said4292VVDsay charter4293NNcharter schools4294NNSschool ,4295,, I4296PPI took4297VVDtake those4298DTthose to4299TOto be4300VBbe private4301JJprivate schools4302NNSschool .4303SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]4304LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Forget4305VVforget the4306DTthe charter4307NNcharter schools4308NNSschool .4309SENT. Same4310JJsame ...4311:... same4312JJsame question4313NNquestion .4314SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]4315LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] If4316INif ...4317:... if4318INif a4319DTa city4320NNcity or4321CCor state4322NNstate gives4323VVZgive out4324RPout funds4325NNSfund for4326INfor private4327JJprivate education4328NNeducation ,4329,, which4330WDTwhich it4331PPit 's4332VBZbe not4333RBnot required4334VVNrequire to4335TOto do4336VVdo ,4337,, it4338PPit can4339MDcan limit4340VVlimit its4341PP$its funding4342NNfunding to4343TOto public4344JJpublic schools4345NNSschool ,4346,, but4347CCbut if4348INif it4349PPit gives4350VVZgive it4351PPit out4352RPout and4353CCand it4354PPit gives4355VVZgive it4356PPit out4357RPout just4358RBjust for4359INfor scholarships4360NNSscholarship for4361INfor private4362JJprivate schools4363NNSschool ...4364:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4365LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] My4366PP$my hypothetical4367JJhypothetical was4368VBDbe they4369PPthey give4370VVPgive it4371PPit out4372RPout in4373INin ...4374:... it4375PPit 's4376VHZhave called4377VVNcall the4378DTthe Public4379NPPublic School4380NPSchool System4381NPSystem of4382INof the4383DTthe United4384NPUnited States4385NPSStates .4386SENT. I4387PPI 'm4388VBPbe saying4389VVGsay that4390DTthat 's4391VBZbe what4392WPwhat I4393PPI 'm4394VBPbe talking4395VVGtalk about4396RBabout .4397SENT. Now4398RBnow ,4399,, what4400WPwhat 's4401VHZhave your4402PP$your response4403NNresponse ?4404SENT? What4405WPWhat 's4406VBZbe the4407DTthe difference4408NNdifference between4409INbetween this4410DTthis case4411NNcase ,4412,, you4413PPyou win4414VVPwin ,4415,, and4416CCand the4417DTthe same4418JJsame with4419INwith the4420DTthe public4421JJpublic schools4422NNSschool ,4423,, they4424PPthey have4425VHPhave to4426TOto give4427VVgive it4428PPit to4429TOto parochial4430JJparochial schools4431NNSschool too4432RBtoo .4433SENT. What4434WPWhat 's4435VBZbe the4436DTthe difference4437NNdifference ?4438SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]4439LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Justice4440NPJustice Breyer4441NPBreyer ,4442,, what4443WPwhat I4444PPI 'm4445VBPbe saying4446VVGsay in4447INin the4448DTthe last4449JJlast paragraph4450NNparagraph of4451INof Trinity4452NPTrinity Lutheran4453NPLutheran ,4454,, when4455WRBwhen the4456DTthe Court4457NPCourt said4458VVDsay you4459PPyou can4460MDcan 't4461RB't deny4462VVdeny a4463DTa generally4464RBgenerally available4465JJavailable public4466JJpublic benefit4467NNbenefit to4468TOto an4469DTan entity4470NNentity that4471WDTthat 's4472VBZbe otherwise4473RBotherwise qualified4474VVNqualify based4475VVNbase solely4476RBsolely on4477INon its4478PP$its religious4479JJreligious character4480NNcharacter or4481CCor nature4482NNnature ...4483:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4484LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So4485INso Mr4486NPMr .4487SENT. Wall4488NPWall ,4489,, do4490VVPdo n't4491RBn't you4492PPyou ...4493:... [MR. WALL J.B.]4494LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] ...4495:... that4496DTthat rule4497NNrule applies4498VVZapply equally4499RBequally to4500TOto schools4501NNSschool as4502RBas to4503TOto playgrounds4504NNSplayground .4505SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4506LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Mr4507NPMr .4508SENT. Wall4509NPWall ,4510,, I4511PPI mean4512VVPmean ,4513,, there4514EXthere seems4515VVZseem ...4516:... I4517PPI was4518VBDbe one4519CDone of4520INof the4521DTthe seven4522CDseven in4523INin Trinity4524NPTrinity Lutheran4525NPLutheran ,4526,, but4527CCbut there4528EXthere seems4529VVZseem to4530TOto me4531PPme a4532DTa real4533JJreal difference4534NNdifference in4535INin this4536DTthis case4537NNcase .4538SENT. In4539INin Trinity4540NPTrinity Lutheran4541NPLutheran ,4542,, the4543DTthe ...4544:... a4545DTa state4546NNstate was4547VBDbe using4548VVGuse the4549DTthe religious4550JJreligious status4551NNstatus of4552INof various4553JJvarious people4554NNSpeople or4555CCor entities4556NNSentity to4557TOto limit4558VVlimit access4559NNaccess to4560TOto a4561DTa unrelated4562JJunrelated public4563JJpublic benefit4564NNbenefit ,4565,, to4566TOto a4567DTa completely4568RBcompletely secular4569JJsecular public4570JJpublic benefit4571NNbenefit .4572SENT. Now4573RBnow ,4574,, here4575RBhere ,4576,, it4577PPit seems4578VVZseem to4579TOto me4580PPme ,4581,, that4582IN/thatthat what4583WPwhat the4584DTthe state4585NNstate is4586VBZbe doing4587VVGdo with4588INwith respect4589NNrespect to4590TOto these4591DTthese educational4592JJeducational programs4593NNSprogram is4594VBZbe to4595TOto say4596VVsay :4597:: We4598PPwe do4599VVPdo n't4600RBn't want4601VVwant to4602TOto subsidize4603VVsubsidize religious4604JJreligious activity4605NNactivity .4606SENT. We4607PPwe do4608VVPdo n't4609RBn't want4610VVwant to4611TOto subsidize4612VVsubsidize religious4613JJreligious education4614NNeducation .4615SENT. And4616CCand ,4617,, further4618RBRfurther ,4619,, because4620INbecause of4621INof the4622DTthe way4623NNway that4624IN/thatthat the4625DTthe supreme4626JJsupreme court4627NNcourt issued4628VVDissue its4629PP$its decision4630NNdecision ,4631,, that4632WDTthat will4633MDwill mean4634VVmean that4635IN/thatthat we4636PPwe do4637VVPdo n't4638RBn't want4639VVwant to4640TOto subsidize4641VVsubsidize any4642DTany private4643JJprivate education4644NNeducation .4645SENT. So4646RBso you4647PPyou have4648VHPhave both4649PDTboth the4650DTthe non-discrimination4651NNnon-discrimination as4652RBas to4653TOto that4654DTthat ,4655,, but4656CCbut even4657RBeven put4658VVDput that4659IN/thatthat aside4660RBaside ,4661,, what4662WPwhat this4663DTthis is4664VBZbe is4665VBZbe essentially4666RBessentially a4667DTa state4668NNstate saying4669VVGsay ,4670,, for4671INfor many4672JJmany reasons4673NNSreason that4674WDTthat have4675VHPhave been4676VBNbe viewed4677VVNview as4678INas legitimate4679JJlegitimate ,4680,, even4681RBeven though4682INthough not4683RBnot shared4684VVNshare by4685INby everybody4686NNeverybody ,4687,, but4688CCbut have4689VHPhave been4690VBNbe viewed4691VVNview as4692RBas legitimate4693JJlegitimate for4694INfor many4695JJmany years4696NNSyear ,4697,, we4698PPwe do4699VVPdo n't4700RBn't want4701VVwant to4702TOto subsidize4703VVsubsidize religious4704JJreligious activity4705NNactivity ,4706,, in4707INin particular4708JJparticular religious4709JJreligious education4710NNeducation .4711SENT. That4712DTthat 's4713VBZbe a4714DTa far4715JJfar cry4716NNcry from4717INfrom Trinity4718NPTrinity Lutheran4719NPLutheran .4720SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]4721LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So4722INso your4723PP$your question4724NNquestion gets4725VVZget at4726INat the4727DTthe two4728CDtwo things4729NNSthing I4730PPI was4731VBDbe hoping4732VVGhope to4733TOto say4734VVsay before4735INbefore I4736PPI sat4737VVDsit down4738RPdown .4739SENT. 24740CD2 The4741DTthe ...4742:... the4743DTthe first4744JJfirst is4745VBZbe all4746DTall we4747PPwe 're4748VBPbe asking4749VVGask and4750CCand the4751DTthe Petitioners4752NNSpetitioner are4753VBPbe asking4754VVGask is4755VBZbe that4756IN/thatthat you4757PPyou do4758VVPdo what4759WPwhat you4760PPyou normally4761RBnormally do4762VVPdo when4763WRBwhen you4764PPyou review4765VVPreview a4766DTa state4767NNstate supreme4768JJsupreme court4769NNcourt decision4770NNdecision .4771SENT. At4772INat page4773NNpage 324774CD@card@ of4775INof the4776DTthe Pet4777NPPet .4778SENT. App4779NPApp .4780SENT. ,4781,, it4782PPit said4783VVDsay no4784DTno problem4785NNproblem with4786INwith federal4787JJfederal law4788NNlaw .4789SENT. It4790PPit got4791VVDget federal4792JJfederal law4793NNlaw wrong4794JJwrong .4795SENT. If4796INif it4797PPit had4798VHDhave come4799VVNcome out4800RPout correctly4801RBcorrectly on4802INon the4803DTthe federal4804JJfederal law4805NNlaw question4806NNquestion ,4807,, nothing4808NNnothing else4809RBelse in4810INin the4811DTthe decision4812NNdecision would4813MDwould have4814VHhave flowed4815VVNflow .4816SENT. The4817DTthe trial4818NNtrial court4819NNcourt would4820MDwould have4821VHhave been4822VBNbe affirmed4823VVNaffirm and4824CCand everybody4825NNeverybody would4826MDwould have4827VHhave gotten4828VVNget the4829DTthe scholarships4830NNSscholarship .4831SENT. That4832DTthat ...4833:... with4834INwith the4835DTthe application4836NNapplication of4837INof the4838DTthe state4839NNstate constitutional4840JJconstitutional provision4841NNprovision ,4842,, which4843WDTwhich was4844VBDbe preempted4845VVNpreempt under4846INunder Trinity4847NPTrinity Lutheran4848NPLutheran ,4849,, was4850VBDbe the4851DTthe only4852JJonly basis4853NNbasis to4854TOto impugn4855VVimpugn the4856DTthe state4857NNstate law4858NNlaw .4859SENT. So4860RBso you4861PPyou should4862MDshould reverse4863VVreverse the4864DTthe federal4865JJfederal error4866NNerror and4867CCand send4868VVsend it4869PPit back4870RBback .4871SENT. On4872INon the4873DTthe merits4874NNSmerit of4875INof your4876PP$your question4877NNquestion ,4878,, look4879VVlook ,4880,, I4881PPI get4882VVPget that4883IN/thatthat you4884PPyou can4885MDcan say4886VVsay it4887PPit 's4888VBZbe a4889DTa harder4890JJRhard case4891NNcase because4892INbecause it4893PPit 's4894VBZbe ...4895:... it4896PPit 's4897POS's education4898NNeducation and4899CCand it4900PPit 's4901VBZbe not4902RBnot a4903DTa playground4904NNplayground .4905SENT. And4906CCand in4907INin that4908DTthat sense4909NNsense ,4910,, it4911PPit may4912MDmay be4913VBbe a4914DTa harder4915JJRhard question4916NNquestion ,4917,, but4918CCbut the4919DTthe Montana4920NPMontana Supreme4921NPSupreme Court4922NPCourt did4923VVDdo n't4924RBn't take4925VVtake it4926PPit as4927INas a4928DTa case4929NNcase about4930INabout use4931NNuse ,4932,, did4933VVDdo n't4934RBn't try4935VVtry to4936TOto say4937VVsay this4938DTthis was4939VBDbe covered4940VVNcover by4941INby Davey4942NPDavey or4943CCor any4944DTany of4945INof the4946DTthe rest4947NNrest .4948SENT. It4949PPit said4950VVDsay religiously-affiliated4951JJreligiously-affiliated schools4952NNSschool .4953SENT. That4954DTthat 's4955VBZbe a4956DTa status-based4957JJstatus-based distinction4958NNdistinction .4959SENT. And4960CCand I4961PPI do4962VVPdo n't4963RBn't think4964VVthink we4965PPwe can4966MDcan distinguish4967VVdistinguish that4968IN/thatthat from4969INfrom Trinity4970NPTrinity Lutheran4971NPLutheran .4972SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4973LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank4974VVthank you4975PPyou ,4976,, counsel4977NNcounsel .4978SENT. Mr4979NPMr .4980SENT. Unikowsky4981NPUnikowsky .4982SENT.

[MR. UNIKOWSKY]4983LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Mr4984NPMr .4985SENT. Chief4986NPChief Justice4987NPJustice ,4988,, and4989CCand may4990MDmay it4991PPit please4992VVplease the4993DTthe Court4994NPCourt :4995:: The4996DTthe Constitution4997NPConstitution does4998VVZdo not4999RBnot bar5000VVbar the5001DTthe State5002NNstate of5003INof Montana5004NPMontana from5005INfrom enacting5006VVGenact and5007CCand applying5008VVGapply a5009DTa state5010NNstate constitutional5011JJconstitutional provision5012NNprovision that5013WDTthat keeps5014VVZkeep its5015PP$its own5016JJown state5017NNstate legislature5018NNlegislature out5019INout of5020INof the5021DTthe business5022NNbusiness of5023INof funding5024NNfunding of5025INof religious5026JJreligious schools5027NNSschool .5028SENT. The5029DTthe no-aid5030NNno-aid clause5031NNclause does5032VVZdo not5033RBnot prohibit5034VVprohibit anyone5035NNanyone 's5036POS's free5037JJfree exercise5038NNexercise of5039INof religion5040NNreligion .5041SENT. To5042TOTo the5043DTthe contrary5044NNcontrary ,5045,, it5046PPit protects5047VVZprotect religious5048JJreligious freedom5049NNfreedom by5050INby protecting5051VVGprotect religious5052JJreligious schools5053NNSschool from5054INfrom government5055NNgovernment influence5056NNinfluence and5057CCand ensuring5058VVGensure that5059DTthat government5060NNgovernment cannot5061MDcan use5062VVuse aid5063NNaid as5064INas leverage5065NNleverage to5066TOto influence5067VVinfluence the5068DTthe content5069NNcontent of5070INof religious5071JJreligious education5072NNeducation .5073SENT. Petitioners5074NNSpetitioner attempt5075VVPattempt to5076TOto analogize5077VVanalogize this5078DTthis case5079NNcase to5080TOto Trinity5081NPTrinity Lutheran5082NPLutheran but5083CCbut the5084DTthe analogy5085NNanalogy is5086VBZbe inapt5087JJinapt for5088INfor two5089CDtwo reasons5090NNSreason :5091:: The5092DTthe first5093JJfirst reason5094NNreason is5095VBZbe that5096IN/thatthat the5097DTthe coercion5098NNcoercion aspect5099NNaspect of5100INof Trinity5101NPTrinity Lutheran5102NPLutheran ,5103,, which5104WDTwhich was5105VBDbe crucial5106JJcrucial to5107TOto the5108DTthe Court5109NPCourt 's5110POS's decision5111NNdecision ,5112,, was5113VBDbe absent5114JJabsent here5115RBhere .5116SENT. In5117INin Trinity5118NPTrinity Lutheran5119NPLutheran ,5120,, the5121DTthe church5122NNchurch put5123VVDput to5124TOto a5125DTa stark5126JJstark choice5127NNchoice :5128:: Either5129CCeither abandon5130VVabandon your5131PP$your religious5132JJreligious faith5133NNfaith and5134CCand become5135VVbecome a5136DTa nice5137JJnice secular5138JJsecular stone5139NNstone building5140NNbuilding with5141INwith a5142DTa daycare5143NNdaycare facility5144NNfacility and5145CCand you5146PPyou 're5147VBPbe going5148VVGgo to5149TOto get5150VVget the5151DTthe money5152NNmoney or5153CCor stick5154VVstick to5155TOto your5156PP$your religious5157JJreligious faith5158NNfaith and5159CCand you5160PPyou won5161MDwill 't5162RB't get5163VVget ...5164:... you5165PPyou won5166MDwill 't5167RB't get5168VVget the5169DTthe money5170NNmoney .5171SENT. And5172CCand that5173DTthat coercion5174NNcoercion was5175VBDbe the5176DTthe premise5177NNpremise of5178INof the5179DTthe Court5180NPCourt 's5181POS's decision5182NNdecision that5183IN/thatthat there5184EXthere is5185VBZbe a5186DTa penalty5187NNpenalty on5188INon free5189JJfree exercise5190NNexercise .5191SENT. That5192DTthat 's5193VBZbe not5194RBnot happening5195VVGhappen in5196INin this5197DTthis case5198NNcase where5199WRBwhere the5200DTthe state5201NNstate court5202NNcourt held5203VVDhold that5204IN/thatthat Montana5205NPMontana was5206VBDbe n't5207RBn't even5208RBeven capable5209JJcapable of5210INof knowing5211VVGknow whether5212INwhether a5213DTa particular5214JJparticular parent5215NNparent would5216MDwould use5217VVuse money5218NNmoney for5219INfor a5220DTa religious5221JJreligious and5222CCand non-religious5223JJnon-religious school5224NNschool ,5225,, and5226CCand it5227PPit therefore5228RBtherefore held5229VVDhold that5230IN/thatthat regardless5231RBregardless of5232INof how5233WRBhow the5234DTthe money5235NNmoney was5236VBDbe spent5237VVNspend ,5238,, there5239EXthere would5240MDwould n't5241RBn't be5242VBbe a5243DTa tax5244NNtax credit5245NNcredit .5246SENT. The5247DTthe second5248JJsecond distinction5249NNdistinction from5250INfrom Trinity5251NPTrinity Lutheran5252NPLutheran is5253VBZbe that5254IN/thatthat Trinity5255NPTrinity Lutheran5256NPLutheran involved5257VVDinvolve the5258DTthe refusal5259NNrefusal to5260TOto give5261VVgive money5262NNmoney to5263TOto a5264DTa church5265NNchurch for5266INfor a5267DTa completely5268RBcompletely non-religious5269JJnon-religious purpose5270NNpurpose ,5271,, merely5272RBmerely because5273INbecause it5274PPit was5275VBDbe a5276DTa church5277NNchurch .5278SENT. This5279DTthis case5280NNcase is5281VBZbe different5282JJdifferent in5283INin that5284IN/thatthat the5285DTthe state5286NNstate is5287VBZbe simply5288RBsimply declining5289VVGdecline to5290TOto fund5291VVfund religious5292JJreligious education5293NNeducation .5294SENT. The5295DTthe state5296NNstate court5297NNcourt did5298VVDdo not5299RBnot hold5300VVhold that5301IN/thatthat under5302INunder the5303DTthe no-aid5304NNno-aid clause5305NNclause ,5306,, religious5307JJreligious schools5308NNSschool would5309MDwould be5310VBbe denied5311VVNdeny funding5312NNfunding for5313INfor non-religious5314JJnon-religious purposes5315NNSpurpose .5316SENT. So5317RBso let5318VVlet me5319PPme start5320VVstart with5321INwith the5322DTthe standing5323NNstanding point5324NNpoint which5325WDTwhich came5326VVDcome up5327RPup during5328INduring the5329DTthe first5330JJfirst half5331NNhalf hour5332NNhour .5333SENT. So5334RBso we5335PPwe did5336VVDdo n't5337RBn't ,5338,, as5339INas the5340DTthe Court5341NPCourt knows5342VVZknow ,5343,, it5344PPit 's5345VBZbe in5346INin an5347DTan amicus5348NNamicus brief5349NNbrief ,5350,, but5351CCbut we5352PPwe did5353VVDdo n't5354RBn't make5355VVmake the5356DTthe argument5357NNargument in5358INin our5359PP$our brief5360NNbrief because5361INbecause we5362PPwe concluded5363VVDconclude that5364IN/thatthat the5365DTthe arguments5366NNSargument really5367RBreally went5368VVDgo more5369RBRmore to5370TOto the5371DTthe merits5372NNSmerit rather5373RBrather than5374INthan standing5375NNstanding .5376SENT. We5377PPwe ...5378:... I5379PPI ...5380:... I5381PPI mean5382VVPmean ,5383,, we5384PPwe believe5385VVPbelieve there5386EXthere 's5387VBZbe an5388DTan attenuated5389JJattenuated connection5390NNconnection between5391INbetween the5392DTthe state5393NNstate action5394NNaction here5395RBhere and5396CCand Petitioners5397NNSpetitioner '5398POS' free5399JJfree exercise5400NNexercise of5401INof religion5402NNreligion but5403CCbut Petitioners5404NNSpetitioner are5405VBPbe alleging5406VVGallege in5407INin their5408PP$their brief5409NNbrief that5410IN/thatthat they5411PPthey personally5412RBpersonally are5413VBPbe the5414DTthe victims5415NNSvictim of5416INof status5417NNstatus discrimination5418NNdiscrimination because5419INbecause they5420PPthey are5421VBPbe Christians5422NNSChristian .5423SENT. We5424PPwe think5425VVPthink that5426WDTthat 's5427VBZbe wrong5428RBwrong based5429VVNbase on5430INon what5431WPwhat the5432DTthe state5433NNstate court5434NNcourt actually5435RBactually did5436VVDdo ,5437,, but5438CCbut historically5439RBhistorically the5440DTthe courthouse5441NNcourthouse doors5442NNSdoor have5443VHPhave been5444VBNbe open5445JJopen to5446TOto make5447VVmake that5448DTthat kind5449NNkind of5450INof argument5451NNargument .5452SENT. But5453CCbut we5454PPwe think5455VVPthink on5456INon the5457DTthe merits5458NNSmerit ,5459,, there5460EXthere simply5461RBsimply is5462VBZbe n't5463RBn't a5464DTa prohibition5465NNprohibition on5466INon the5467DTthe free5468JJfree exercise5469NNexercise .5470SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5471LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I5472PPI ...5473:... I5474PPI 'd5475MDwould like5476VVlike to5477TOto get5478VVget back5479RBback to5480TOto Justice5481NPJustice Breyer5482NPBreyer 's5483POS's question5484NNquestion and5485CCand get5486VVget your5487PP$your view5488NNview you5489PPyou on5490INon it5491PPit which5492WDTwhich I5493PPI understand5494VVPunderstand it5495PPit to5496TOto be5497VBbe that5498IN/thatthat why5499WRBwhy does5500VVZdo n't5501RBn't ...5502:... do5503VVPdo you5504PPyou think5505VVPthink the5506DTthe other5507JJother side5508NNside 's5509POS's theory5510NNtheory leads5511VVZlead to5512TOto a5513DTa situation5514NNsituation where5515WRBwhere the5516DTthe funding5517NNfunding that5518WDTthat goes5519VVZgo to5520TOto public5521JJpublic schools5522NNSschool ,5523,, a5524DTa ...5525:... a5526DTa ...5527:... if5528INif ...5529:... if5530INif they5531PPthey prevail5532VVPprevail ,5533,, would5534MDwould n't5535RBn't have5536VHhave to5537TOto go5538VVgo to5539TOto religious5540JJreligious schools5541NNSschool ?5542SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]5543LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Well5544UHwell ,5545,, I5546PPI mean5547VVPmean ,5548,, I5549PPI 'm5550VBPbe not5551RBnot sure5552JJsure of5553INof the5554DTthe breadth5555NNbreadth of5556INof their5557PP$their theory5558NNtheory .5559SENT. I5560PPI mean5561VVPmean ,5562,, there5563EXthere 's5564VBZbe a5565DTa number5566NNnumber of5567INof amicus5568NNamicus briefs5569NNSbrief that5570RBthat ...5571:... that5572WDTthat make5573VVPmake that5574DTthat exact5575JJexact point5576NNpoint .5577SENT. I5578PPI mean5579VVPmean ...5580:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5581LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well5582UHwell ,5583,, let5584VVlet 's5585VBZbe take5586VVtake it5587PPit to5588TOto be5589VBbe just5590RBjust that5591RBthat ,5592,, I5593PPI mean5594VVPmean ,5595,, this5596DTthis is5597VBZbe a5598DTa case5599NNcase about5600INabout money5601NNmoney and5602CCand the5603DTthe question5604NNquestion whether5605INwhether or5606CCor not5607RBnot it5608PPit must5609MDmust go5610VVgo to5611TOto religious5612JJreligious schools5613NNSschool .5614SENT. And5615CCand I5616PPI am5617VBPbe wondering5618VVGwonder if5619INif the5620DTthe public5621NNpublic ...5622:... the5623DTthe funding5624NNfunding of5625INof public5626JJpublic schools5627NNSschool is5628VBZbe the5629DTthe same5630JJsame as5631INas the5632DTthe situation5633NNsituation involved5634VVNinvolve here5635RBhere in5636INin your5637PP$your ...5638:... in5639INin your5640PP$your view5641NNview ?5642SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]5643LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I5644PPI guess5645VVPguess I5646PPI do5647VVPdo n't5648RBn't understand5649VVunderstand Petitioners5650NNSpetitioner to5651TOto be5652VBbe making5653VVGmake that5654DTthat argument5655NNargument in5656INin this5657DTthis particular5658JJparticular case5659NNcase .5660SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]5661LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] They5662PPthey 're5663VBPbe not5664RBnot ,5665,, but5666CCbut that5667DTthat 's5668VBZbe what's5669NNwhat's ...5670:... but5671CCbut it5672PPit still5673RBstill can5674MDcan bother5675VVbother me5676PPme .5677SENT. I5678PPI 'd5679MDwould like5680VVlike to5681TOto know5682VVknow if5683INif in5684INin deciding5685VVGdecide it5686PPit for5687INfor them5688PPthem ,5689,, if5690INif I5691PPI do5692VVPdo ,5693,, that5694IN/thatthat I5695PPI have5696VHPhave made5697VVNmake a5698DTa major5699JJmajor change5700NNchange in5701INin the5702DTthe public5703JJpublic school5704NNschool system5705NNsystem .5706SENT. I5707PPI understand5708VVPunderstand one5709PPone 's5710VBZbe private5711JJprivate and5712CCand the5713DTthe other5714JJother 's5715POS's public5716NNpublic .5717SENT. And5718CCand what5719WPwhat I5720PPI 'm5721VBPbe asking5722VVGask for5723INfor ,5724,, you5725PPyou or5726CCor them5727PPthem ,5728,, why5729WRBwhy would5730MDwould that5731DTthat matter5732NNmatter ?5733SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]5734LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Well5735UHWell ...5736:... [JUSTICE BREYER]5737LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] That5738DTthat is5739VBZbe ,5740,, why5741WRBwhy ...5742:... why5743WRBwhy would5744MDwould it5745PPit make5746VVmake a5747DTa difference5748NNdifference ,5749,, if5750INif you5751PPyou have5752VHPhave to5753TOto give5754VVgive ...5755:... I5756PPI mean5757VVPmean ,5758,, now5759RBnow do5760VVPdo n't5761RBn't jump5762VVjump on5763INon to5764TOto my5765PP$my argument5766NNargument and5767CCand say5768VVPsay ,5769,, great5770JJgreat ,5771,, it5772PPit supports5773VVZsupport you5774PPyou .5775SENT. I5776PPI 'm5777VBPbe not5778RBnot making5779VVGmake an5780DTan argument5781NNargument to5782TOto support5783VVsupport you5784PPyou .5785SENT. [5786SYM[ LAUGHTER5787NNlaughter ]5788SYM] [JUSTICE BREYER]5789LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I5790PPI 'm5791VBPbe asking5792VVGask a5793DTa question5794NNquestion to5795TOto find5796VVfind out5797RPout the5798DTthe answer5799NNanswer .5800SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]5801LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Well5802UHWell ,5803,, I5804PPI ...5805:... I5806PPI ...5807:... I5808PPI 'm5809VBPbe not5810RBnot sure5811JJsure exactly5812RBexactly how5813WRBhow far5814RBfar Petitioners5815NNSpetitioner '5816POS' argument5817NNargument would5818MDwould lead5819VVlead ,5820,, but5821CCbut I5822PPI ...5823:... I5824PPI do5825VVPdo think5826VVthink that5827IN/thatthat one5828CDone important5829JJimportant point5830NNpoint of5831INof this5832DTthis ...5833:... in5834INin this5835DTthis case5836NNcase is5837VBZbe that5838IN/thatthat states5839NNSstate generally5840RBgenerally have5841VHPhave had5842VHNhave power5843NNpower over5844INover education5845NNeducation ,5846,, and5847CCand to5848TOto decide5849VVdecide that5850IN/thatthat they5851PPthey 're5852VBPbe only5853RBonly going5854VVGgo to5855TOto fund5856VVfund the5857DTthe public5858JJpublic school5859NNschool system5860NNsystem ,5861,, and5862CCand that5863DTthat is5864VBZbe the5865DTthe ultimate5866JJultimate effect5867NNeffect of5868INof the5869DTthe state5870NNstate court5871NNcourt 's5872POS's judgment5873NNjudgment in5874INin this5875DTthis case5876NNcase .5877SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5878LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] But5879CCbut ,5880,, I5881PPI wonder5882VVPwonder if5883INif ...5884:... if5885INif there5886EXthere 's5887VBZbe a5888DTa difference5889NNdifference in5890INin the5891DTthe sense5892NNsense that5893WDTthat ...5894:... that5895DTthat ...5896:... between5897INbetween general5898JJgeneral funding5899NNfunding of5900INof the5901DTthe public5902JJpublic schools5903NNSschool and5904CCand the5905DTthe decision5906NNdecision to5907TOto provide5908VVprovide aid5909NNaid to5910TOto private5911JJprivate schools5912NNSschool ,5913,, except5914INexcept not5915RBnot religious5916JJreligious schools5917NNSschool .5918SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]5919LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Well5920UHWell ,5921,, so5922RBso I5923PPI think5924VVPthink that5925IN/thatthat ,5926,, you5927PPyou know5928VVPknow ,5929,, the5930DTthe question5931NNquestion in5932INin this5933DTthis case5934NNcase ultimately5935RBultimately boils5936VVZboil down5937RPdown to5938TOto ,5939,, whether5940INwhether the5941DTthe striking5942VVGstrike down5943RPdown of5944INof the5945DTthe program5946NNprogram because5947INbecause of5948INof the5949DTthe no-aid5950NNno-aid clause5951NNclause just5952RBjust in5953INin and5954CCand of5955INof itself5956PPitself is5957VBZbe a5958DTa violation5959NNviolation of5960INof the5961DTthe free5962JJfree exercise5963NNexercise right5964NNright of5965INof Petitioners5966NNSpetitioner .5967SENT. And5968CCand ,5969,, you5970PPyou know5971VVPknow ,5972,, the5973DTthe first5974JJfirst half5975NNhalf of5976INof the5977DTthe argument5978NNargument involved5979VVDinvolve a5980DTa number5981NNnumber of5982INof questions5983NNSquestion about5984INabout how5985WRBhow Petitioners5986NNSpetitioner are5987VBPbe really5988RBreally harmed5989VVNharm if5990INif the5991DTthe program5992NNprogram as5993INas a5994DTa whole5995NNwhole is5996VBZbe struck5997VVNstrike down5998RPdown .5999SENT. And6000CCand I6001PPI think6002VVPthink I6003PPI heard6004VVDhear two6005CDtwo sets6006NNSset of6007INof arguments6008NNSargument from6009INfrom the6010DTthe other6011JJother side6012NNside ,6013,, from6014INfrom Petitioners6015NNSpetitioner ,6016,, both6017CCboth of6018INof which6019WDTwhich I6020PPI would6021MDwould like6022VVlike to6023TOto address6024VVaddress .6025SENT. One6026CDOne argument6027NNargument is6028VBZbe the6029DTthe sort6030NNsort of6031INof broader6032JJRbroad argument6033NNargument that6034IN/thatthat just6035RBjust ,6036,, the6037DTthe no-aid6038NNno-aid clause6039NNclause is6040VBZbe just6041RBjust constitutionally6042RBconstitutionally defective6043JJdefective ,6044,, like6045VVlike ,6046,, by6047INby its6048PP$its very6049JJvery nature6050NNnature ,6051,, because6052INbecause it6053PPit is6054VBZbe discriminatory6055JJdiscriminatory ,6056,, is6057VBZbe not6058RBnot capable6059JJcapable of6060INof being6061VBGbe applied6062VVNapply ,6063,, and6064CCand ,6065,, therefore6066RBtherefore ,6067,, the6068DTthe court6069NNcourt should6070MDshould just6071RBjust remand6072VVremand and6073CCand tell6074VVtell the6075DTthe court6076NNcourt you6077PPyou just6078RBjust can6079MDcan 't6080RB't apply6081VVapply this6082DTthis illegal6083JJillegal rule6084NNrule .6085SENT. And6086CCand the6087DTthe second6088JJsecond argument6089NNargument I6090PPI heard6091VVNhear is6092VBZbe this6093DTthis somewhat6094RBsomewhat narrower6095JJRnarrow argument6096NNargument that6097IN/thatthat as6098RBas applied6099VVNapply ,6100,, the6101DTthe problem6102NNproblem here6103RBhere is6104VBZbe that6105IN/thatthat the6106DTthe court6107NNcourt excluded6108VVDexclude religious6109JJreligious schools6110NNSschool from6111INfrom a6112DTa general6113JJgeneral program6114NNprogram as6115INas in6116INin Trinity6117NPTrinity Lutheran6118NPLutheran .6119SENT. So6120RBso if6121INif I6122PPI could6123MDcould just6124RBjust address6125VVaddress those6126DTthose ...6127:... those6128DTthose two6129CDtwo theories6130NNStheory of6131INof the6132DTthe case6133NNcase by6134INby Petitioners6135NNSpetitioner .6136SENT. So6137RBso I6138PPI think6139VVPthink the6140DTthe first6141JJfirst argument6142NNargument really6143RBreally is6144VBZbe tantamount6145JJtantamount to6146TOto an6147DTan argument6148NNargument that6149IN/thatthat the6150DTthe no-aid6151NNno-aid clause6152NNclause is6153VBZbe facially6154RBfacially unconstitutional6155JJunconstitutional ,6156,, because6157INbecause like6158INlike every6159DTevery single6160JJsingle time6161NNtime you6162PPyou applied6163VVDapply the6164DTthe no-aid6165NNno-aid clause6166NNclause ,6167,, the6168DTthe rule6169NNrule it6170PPit recites6171VVZrecite is6172VBZbe that6173IN/thatthat religious6174JJreligious schools6175NNSschool do6176VVPdo n't6177RBn't get6178VVget money6179NNmoney because6180INbecause ...6181:... [JUSTICE ALITO]6182LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well6183UHwell ,6184,, I6185PPI thought6186VVDthink they6187PPthey were6188VBDbe quite6189RBquite clear6190JJclear ,6191,, that6192IN/thatthat they6193PPthey were6194VBDbe not6195RBnot arguing6196VVGargue ...6197:... they6198PPthey were6199VBDbe not6200RBnot making6201VVGmake a6202DTa facial6203JJfacial challenge6204NNchallenge .6205SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6206LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Right6207NPRight .6208SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]6209LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] It6210PPit was6211VBDbe a6212DTa challenge6213NNchallenge as6214RBas applied6215VVDapply to6216TOto the6217DTthe particular6218JJparticular situation6219NNsituation here6220RBhere .6221SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6222LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Right6223RBright .6224SENT. So6225RBso if6226INif ...6227:... if6228INif that6229WDTthat 's6230VBZbe the6231DTthe case6232NNcase ,6233,, and6234CCand I6235PPI ...6236:... I6237PPI agree6238VVPagree that6239IN/thatthat that6240DTthat 's6241VBZbe the6242DTthe tenor6243NNtenor of6244INof Petitioners6245NNSpetitioner '6246POS' argument6247NNargument .6248SENT. I6249PPI think6250VVPthink the6251DTthe government6252NNgovernment was6253VBDbe making6254VVGmake a6255DTa broader6256JJRbroad argument6257NNargument but6258CCbut I6259PPI think6260VVPthink Petitioners6261NNSpetitioner '6262POS' argument6263NNargument is6264VBZbe more6265RBRmore limited6266JJlimited .6267SENT. So6268RBso if6269INif ...6270:... if6271INif it6272PPit is6273VBZbe the6274DTthe case6275NNcase that6276IN/thatthat in6277INin general6278NNgeneral the6279DTthe Court6280NPCourt ...6281:... the6282DTthe state6283NNstate court6284NNcourt can6285MDcan apply6286VVapply the6287DTthe no-aid6288NNno-aid clause6289NNclause ,6290,, in6291INin other6292JJother words6293NNSword ,6294,, it6295PPit 's6296VBZbe not6297RBnot just6298RBjust facially6299RBfacially discriminatory6300JJdiscriminatory to6301TOto say6302VVsay because6303INbecause something6304NNsomething is6305VBZbe religious6306JJreligious ...6307:... [JUSTICE ALITO]6308LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well6309UHwell ,6310,, they6311PPthey 're6312VBPbe not6313RBnot ...6314:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6315LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] ...6316:... we6317PPwe 're6318VBPbe not6319RBnot ...6320:... [JUSTICE ALITO]6321LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] ...6322:... conceding6323VVGconcede that6324DTthat .6325SENT. They6326PPthey 're6327VBPbe just6328RBjust saying6329VVGsay you6330PPyou have6331VHPhave to6332TOto consider6333VVconsider it6334PPit as6335RBas applied6336VVDapply here6337RBhere .6338SENT. Look6339VVlook ,6340,, I6341PPI ...6342:... I6343PPI ...6344:... I6345PPI like6346VVPlike your6347PP$your reaction6348NNreaction to6349TOto this6350DTthis way6351NNway of6352INof looking6353VVGlook at6354INat the6355DTthe case6356NNcase .6357SENT. Maybe6358RBmaybe it6359PPit 's6360VBZbe right6361JJright ;6362:; maybe6363RBmaybe it6364PPit 's6365VBZbe wrong6366JJwrong .6367SENT. A6368DTa ...6369:... it6370PPit is6371VBZbe a6372DTa violation6373NNviolation of6374INof the6375DTthe Federal6376NPFederal Constitution6377NPConstitution if6378INif a6379DTa state6380NNstate Supreme6381NPSupreme Court6382NPCourt bases6383VVZbase a6384DTa decision6385NNdecision on6386INon a6387DTa ground6388NNground that6389WDTthat discriminates6390VVZdiscriminate in6391INin violation6392NNviolation of6393INof the6394DTthe constitution6395NNconstitution .6396SENT. Do6397VVdo you6398PPyou agree6399VVagree with6400INwith that6401DTthat ?6402SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6403LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I6404PPI would6405MDwould agree6406VVagree with6407INwith that6408DTthat ,6409,, but6410CCbut obviously6411RBobviously the6412DTthe question6413NNquestion is6414VBZbe whether6415INwhether it6416PPit discriminates6417VVZdiscriminate in6418INin violation6419NNviolation of6420INof the6421DTthe Constitution6422NPConstitution ...6423:... [JUSTICE ALITO]6424LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Okay6425NPOkay .6426SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6427LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] ...6428:... the6429DTthe last6430JJlast part6431NNpart of6432INof that6433DTthat .6434SENT. Look6435NNlook ...6436:... [JUSTICE ALITO]6437LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] All6438DTall right6439NNright .6440SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6441LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] ...6442:... I6443PPI 'm6444VBPbe not6445RBnot ...6446:... I6447PPI 'm6448VBPbe not6449RBnot objecting6450VVGobject ...6451:... [JUSTICE ALITO]6452LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] The6453DTthe argument6454NNargument is6455VBZbe if6456INif they6457PPthey ...6458:... they6459PPthey do6460VVPdo n't6461RBn't have6462VHhave to6463TOto fund6464VVfund private6465JJprivate education6466NNeducation at6467INat all6468DTall ,6469,, but6470CCbut if6471INif they6472PPthey choose6473VVPchoose to6474TOto provide6475VVprovide scholarships6476NNSscholarship that6477WDTthat are6478VBPbe available6479JJavailable to6480TOto students6481NNSstudent who6482WPwho attend6483VVPattend private6484JJprivate schools6485NNSschool ,6486,, they6487PPthey can6488MDcan 't6489RB't discriminate6490JJdiscriminate against6491INagainst parents6492NNSparent who6493WPwho want6494VVPwant to6495TOto send6496VVsend their6497PP$their children6498NNSchild to6499TOto schools6500NNSschool that6501WDTthat are6502VBPbe affiliated6503VVNaffiliate in6504INin some6505DTsome way6506NNway with6507INwith a6508DTa church6509NNchurch .6510SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6511LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So6512INso I6513PPI ...6514:... [JUSTICE ALITO]6515LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] That6516DTthat 's6517VBZbe the6518DTthe simple6519JJsimple argument6520NNargument .6521SENT. And6522CCand it6523PPit 's6524VBZbe hard6525JJhard to6526TOto see6527VVsee that6528IN/thatthat that6529DTthat 's6530VBZbe much6531RBmuch different6532JJdifferent from6533INfrom Trinity6534NPTrinity Lutheran6535NPLutheran .6536SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6537LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No6538NPNo ,6539,, I6540PPI think6541VVPthink it6542PPit is6543VBZbe completely6544RBcompletely different6545JJdifferent from6546INfrom Trinity6547NPTrinity Lutheran6548NPLutheran .6549SENT. So6550RBso look6551VVlook ,6552,, I6553PPI 'm6554VBPbe not6555RBnot going6556VVGgo to6557TOto object6558VVobject to6559TOto the6560DTthe general6561JJgeneral premise6562NNpremise that6563IN/thatthat Your6564PP$your Honor6565NPHonor offered6566VVNoffer ,6567,, that6568IN/thatthat if6569INif there6570EXthere 's6571VBZbe like6572INlike a6573DTa ...6574:... a6575DTa ...6576:... a6577DTa legal6578JJlegal rule6579NNrule ,6580,, just6581RBjust the6582DTthe very6583JJvery application6584NNapplication of6585INof the6586DTthe rule6587NNrule is6588VBZbe constitutionally6589RBconstitutionally defective6590JJdefective ,6591,, then6592RBthen you6593PPyou can6594MDcan reverse6595VVreverse the6596DTthe state6597NNstate court6598NNcourt decision6599NNdecision .6600SENT. I'm6601NNI'm ...6602:... I6603PPI 'm6604VBPbe not6605RBnot going6606VVGgo to6607TOto fight6608VVfight that6609DTthat proposition6610NNproposition as6611INas a6612DTa general6613JJgeneral matter6614NNmatter .6615SENT. But6616CCbut that6617DTthat 's6618VBZbe not6619RBnot the6620DTthe question6621NNquestion here6622RBhere .6623SENT. I6624PPI think6625VVPthink the6626DTthe question6627NNquestion here6628RBhere is6629VBZbe whether6630INwhether the6631DTthe state6632NNstate may6633MDmay apply6634VVapply a6635DTa no-aid6636NNno-aid clause6637NNclause .6638SENT. And6639CCand I6640PPI think6641VVPthink that6642IN/thatthat the6643DTthe answer6644NNanswer is6645VBZbe yes6646UHyes .6647SENT. Because6648INbecause if6649INif you6650PPyou accept6651VVPaccept the6652DTthe premise6653NNpremise that6654IN/thatthat the6655DTthe ...6656:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6657LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Counsel6658NPCounsel ,6659,, would6660MDwould n't6661RBn't you6662PPyou ...6663:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6664LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yes6665NPYes .6666SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6667LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] In6668INin terms6669NNSterm of6670INof what6671WPwhat you6672PPyou 're6673VBPbe agreeing6674VVGagree with6675INwith Justice6676NPJustice Alito6677NPAlito ,6678,, I6679PPI just6680RBjust want6681VVPwant to6682TOto press6683VVpress you6684PPyou a6685DTa little6686JJlittle bit6687NNbit further6688RBRfurther .6689SENT. Let6690VVlet 's6691VBZbe say6692VVsay a6693DTa state6694NNstate court6695NNcourt decision6696NNdecision could6697MDcould be6698VBbe consistent6699JJconsistent with6700INwith the6701DTthe constitution6702NNconstitution or6703CCor not6704RBnot consistent6705JJconsistent with6706INwith the6707DTthe constitution6708NNconstitution ,6709,, right6710RBright ?6711SENT? The6712DTthe outcome6713NNoutcome may6714MDmay or6715CCor may6716MDmay not6717RBnot be6718VBbe .6719SENT. If6720INif the6721DTthe ...6722:... if6723INif ...6724:... if6725INif the6726DTthe decision6727NNdecision rests6728VVZrest on6729INon an6730DTan erroneous6731JJerroneous interpretation6732NNinterpretation of6733INof federal6734JJfederal law6735NNlaw and6736CCand remedying6737VVGremedy that6738DTthat error6739NNerror could6740MDcould provide6741VVprovide relief6742NNrelief ,6743,, we6744PPwe have6745VHPhave a6746DTa case6747NNcase ,6748,, do6749VVPdo n't6750RBn't we6751PPwe ?6752SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6753LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I6754PPI mean6755VVPmean ,6756,, in6757INin principle6758NNprinciple ,6759,, if6760INif we6761PPwe assume6762VVPassume there6763EXthere 's6764VBZbe an6765DTan error6766NNerror of6767INof federal6768JJfederal law6769NNlaw in6770INin ...6771:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6772LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Yes6773NPYes .6774SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6775LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] ...6776:... the6777DTthe court6778NNcourt 's6779POS's decision6780NNdecision ...6781:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6782LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Assuming6783VVGassume there6784EXthere 's6785VBZbe an6786DTan error6787NNerror of6788INof federal6789JJfederal ...6790:... in6791INin federal6792JJfederal law6793NNlaw and6794CCand that6795IN/thatthat remedying6796VVGremedy it6797PPit here6798RBhere might6799MDmight provide6800VVprovide relief6801NNrelief to6802TOto plaintiffs6803NNSplaintiff ,6804,, we6805PPwe have6806VHPhave a6807DTa case6808NNcase .6809SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6810LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I6811PPI ...6812:... I6813PPI ...6814:... so6815RBso ,6816,, I6817PPI think6818VVPthink that6819IN/thatthat ,6820,, yes6821UHyes ,6822,, as6823INas a6824DTa general6825JJgeneral matter6826NNmatter ,6827,, at6828INat a6829DTa high6830JJhigh level6831NNlevel of6832INof generality6833NNgenerality ,6834,, if6835INif Petitioners6836NNSpetitioner identify6837VVPidentify an6838DTan error6839NNerror of6840INof federal6841JJfederal law6842NNlaw in6843INin a6844DTa lower6845JJRlow court6846NNcourt decision6847NNdecision ,6848,, I6849PPI think6850VVPthink the6851DTthe Court6852NPCourt can6853MDcan adjudicate6854VVadjudicate the6855DTthe error6856NNerror federally6857RBfederally .6858SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6859LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Okay6860NPOkay .6861SENT. So6862INso the6863DTthe question6864NNquestion really6865RBreally becomes6866VVZbecome do6867VVdo we6868PPwe have6869VHPhave an6870DTan error6871NNerror of6872INof federal6873JJfederal law6874NNlaw here6875RBhere ?6876SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6877LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Right6878RBright .6879SENT. But6880CCbut the6881DTthe question6882NNquestion is6883VBZbe what6884WPwhat becomes6885VVZbecome an6886DTan error6887NNerror of6888INof federal6889JJfederal law6890NNlaw .6891SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]6892LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Suppose6893VVPsuppose ...6894:... suppose6895VVPsuppose the6896DTthe state6897NNstate said6898VVDsay we6899PPwe 're6900VBPbe going6901VVGgo to6902TOto allow6903VVallow the6904DTthe scholarship6905NNscholarship funds6906NNSfund to6907TOto be6908VBbe used6909VVNuse for6910INfor secular6911JJsecular schools6912NNSschool or6913CCor Protestant6914JJProtestant schools6915NNSschool but6916CCbut not6917RBnot for6918INfor Jewish6919JJJewish schools6920NNSschool or6921CCor Catholic6922JJCatholic schools6923NNSschool .6924SENT. Unconstitutional6925JJunconstitutional ?6926SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6927LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yes6928NPYes ,6929,, so6930RBso I6931PPI think6932VVPthink that6933DTthat ...6934:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]6935LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Is6936VBZbe that6937IN/thatthat a6938DTa yes6939NNyes ?6940SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6941LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yes6942NPYes .6943SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]6944LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Okay6945NPOkay .6946SENT. So6947RBso what6948WPwhat 's6949VBZbe different6950JJdifferent when6951WRBwhen you6952PPyou say6953VVPsay the6954DTthe scholarship6955NNscholarship funds6956NNSfund can6957MDcan be6958VBbe used6959VVNuse for6960INfor secular6961JJsecular schools6962NNSschool but6963CCbut not6964RBnot for6965INfor Protestant6966JJProtestant ,6967,, Jewish6968JJJewish ,6969,, Catholic6970JJCatholic or6971CCor other6972JJother religious6973JJreligious schools6974NNSschool because6975INbecause of6976INof the6977DTthe religious6978JJreligious status6979NNstatus ?6980SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]6981LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So6982RBso ,6983,, I6984PPI think6985VVPthink the6986DTthe right6987JJright lens6988NNlens to6989TOto look6990VVlook at6991INat that6992DTthat hypothetical6993JJhypothetical is6994VBZbe the6995DTthe Establishment6996NNestablishment Clause6997NNclause ,6998,, which6999WDTwhich prohibits7000VVZprohibit the7001DTthe state7002NNstate ...7003:... regardless7004RBregardless of7005INof whether7006INwhether there7007EXthere 's7008VBZbe an7009DTan infringement7010NNinfringement on7011INon any7012DTany individual7013JJindividual liberty7014NNliberty ,7015,, I7016PPI think7017VVPthink the7018DTthe Establishment7019NNestablishment Clause7020NNclause prohibits7021VVZprohibit the7022DTthe state7023NNstate from7024INfrom distinguishing7025VVGdistinguish between7026INbetween one7027CDone religion7028NNreligion versus7029INversus a7030DTa different7031JJdifferent religion7032NNreligion .7033SENT. And7034CCand I7035PPI think7036VVPthink that7037DTthat 's7038VBZbe an7039DTan example7040NNexample ...7041:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7042LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But7043CCbut a7044DTa lot7045NNlot of7046INof the7047DTthe free-exercise7048NNfree-exercise equal-treatment7049NNequal-treatment cases7050NNScase ,7051,, going7052VVGgo back7053RBback to7054TOto Everson7055NPEverson ,7056,, McDaniel7057NPMcDaniel ,7058,, say7059VVPsay you7060PPyou can7061MDcan 't7062RB't exclude7063VVPexclude religious7064JJreligious people7065NNSpeople ,7066,, religious7067JJreligious institutions7068NNSinstitution ,7069,, religious7070JJreligious speech7071NNspeech because7072INbecause it7073PPit 's7074VBZbe religious7075JJreligious from7076INfrom a7077DTa generally7078RBgenerally applicable7079JJapplicable program7080NNprogram ...7081:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7082LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Right7083RBright .7084SENT. So7085RBso ...7086:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7087LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...7088:... the7089DTthe fact7090NNfact that7091IN/thatthat it7092PPit 's7093VBZbe odious7094JJodious to7095TOto the7096DTthe Constitution7097NPConstitution to7098TOto quote7099VVquote the7100DTthe words7101NNSword of7102INof Trinity7103NPTrinity Lutheran7104NPLutheran .7105SENT. So7106RBso why7107WRBwhy is7108VBZbe n't7109RBn't this7110DTthis excluding7111VVGexclude religious7112JJreligious people7113NNSpeople ,7114,, telling7115VVGtell them7116PPthem that7117IN/thatthat they7118PPthey 're7119VBPbe not7120RBnot entitled7121VVNentitle to7122TOto equal7123VVequal treatment7124NNtreatment under7125INunder the7126DTthe Constitution7127NPConstitution ,7128,, why7129WRBwhy is7130VBZbe n't7131RBn't that7132IN/thatthat a7133DTa violation7134NNviolation of7135INof ...7136:... a7137DTa straight7138JJstraight violation7139NNviolation of7140INof the7141DTthe Trinity7142NPTrinity Lutheran7143NPLutheran principle7144NNprinciple which7145WDTwhich goes7146VVZgo back7147RBback to7148TOto Everson7149NPEverson ...7150:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7151LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Because7152INbecause I7153PPI think7154VVPthink ...7155:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7156LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And7157CCand why7158WRBwhy is7159VBZbe it7160PPit different7161JJdifferent from7162INfrom other7163JJother hypothetical7164JJhypothetical ?7165SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7166LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I7167PPI think7168VVPthink the7169DTthe state7170NNstate has7171VHZhave a7172DTa choice7173NNchoice ,7174,, right7175RBright ?7176SENT? It7177PPit 's7178VBZbe not7179RBnot allowed7180VVNallow to7181TOto tell7182VVtell people7183NNSpeople we7184PPwe are7185VBPbe going7186VVGgo to7187TOto penalize7188VVpenalize you7189PPyou for7190INfor exercising7191VVGexercise your7192PP$your religion7193NNreligion .7194SENT. That7195DTthat 's7196VBZbe a7197DTa prohibition7198NNprohibition .7199SENT. I7200PPI think7201VVPthink that7202IN/thatthat the7203DTthe core7204JJcore insight7205NNinsight of7206INof a7207DTa case7208NNcase like7209INlike Trinity7210NPTrinity Lutheran7211NPLutheran is7212VBZbe that7213IN/thatthat there7214EXthere 's7215VBZbe no7216DTno difference7217NNdifference between7218INbetween the7219DTthe denial7220NNdenial of7221INof a7222DTa benefit7223NNbenefit and7224CCand a7225DTa fine7226NNfine .7227SENT. That7228DTthat 's7229VBZbe a7230DTa prohibition7231NNprohibition because7232INbecause you7233PPyou 're7234VBPbe actually7235RBactually penalizing7236VVGpenalize the7237DTthe decision7238NNdecision to7239TOto exercise7240VVexercise religion7241NNreligion .7242SENT. That7243DTthat does7244VVZdo n't7245RBn't mean7246VVmean that7247IN/thatthat the7248DTthe state7249NNstate has7250VHZhave to7251TOto fund7252VVfund religious7253JJreligious schools7254NNSschool and7255CCand it7256PPit also7257RBalso does7258VVZdo n't7259RBn't mean7260VVmean the7261DTthe state7262NNstate can7263MDcan 't7264RB't just7265RBjust apply7266VVapply a7267DTa principled7268JJprincipled view7269NNview that7270IN/thatthat it7271PPit does7272VVZdo n't7273RBn't want7274VVwant ...7275:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7276LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But7277CCbut if7278INif you7279PPyou 're7280VBPbe a7281DTa ...7282:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7283LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] ...7284:... to7285TOto get7286VVget involved7287VVNinvolve in7288INin religious7289JJreligious education7290NNeducation .7291SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7292LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] If7293INif you7294PPyou 're7295VBPbe running7296VVGrun a7297DTa scholarship7298NNscholarship fund7299NNfund and7300CCand there7301EXthere 's7302VBZbe a7303DTa group7304NNgroup of7305INof people7306NNSpeople lining7307VVGline up7308RPup for7309INfor the7310DTthe scholarships7311NNSscholarship ,7312,, are7313VBPbe you7314PPyou secular7315JJsecular ?7316SENT? Okay7317RBokay ,7318,, you7319PPyou can7320MDcan get7321VVget it7322PPit ?7323SENT? Are7324VBPbe you7325PPyou Catholic7326JJCatholic ?7327SENT? No7328UHNo ,7329,, you7330PPyou 're7331VBPbe out7332RBout because7333INbecause you7334PPyou 're7335VBPbe Catholic7336JJCatholic .7337SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7338LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yeah7339NPYeah ,7340,, that7341WDTthat 's7342VBZbe exactly7343RBexactly what7344WPwhat the7345DTthe state7346NNstate ...7347:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7348LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] How7349WRBHow is7350VBZbe that7351DTthat ...7352:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7353LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] ...7354:... court7355NNcourt is7356VBZbe not7357RBnot doing7358VVGdo in7359INin this7360DTthis case7361NNcase .7362SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7363LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] How7364NPHow is7365VBZbe that7366DTthat ...7367:... how7368WRBhow is7369VBZbe that7370IN/thatthat consistent7371JJconsistent with7372INwith the7373DTthe principle7374NNprinciple set7375VVDset forth7376RBforth in7377INin Trinity7378NPTrinity Lutheran7379NPLutheran or7380CCor McDaniel7381NPMcDaniel ,7382,, Justice7383NPJustice Brennan7384NPBrennan 's7385POS's concurrence7386NNconcurrence in7387INin McDaniel7388NPMcDaniel ?7389SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7390LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I7391PPI think7392VVPthink that7393WDTthat 's7394VBZbe exactly7395RBexactly what7396WPwhat the7397DTthe state7398NNstate court7399NNcourt ensured7400VVNensure would7401MDwould n't7402RBn't happen7403VVhappen .7404SENT. It7405PPit 's7406VBZbe not7407RBnot just7408RBjust a7409DTa matter7410NNmatter of7411INof like7412JJlike ...7413:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7414LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] The7415DTthe predicate7416NNpredicate ...7417:... the7418DTthe predicate7419NNpredicate was7420VBDbe that7421IN/thatthat that7422DTthat kind7423NNkind of7424INof discrimination7425NNdiscrimination is7426VBZbe ...7427:... does7428VVZdo not7429RBnot violate7430VVviolate the7431DTthe Federal7432NPFederal Constitution7433NPConstitution .7434SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7435LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No7436NPNo ,7437,, I7438PPI ...7439:... I7440PPI ...7441:... I7442PPI think7443VVPthink that7444IN/thatthat the7445DTthe state7446NNstate court7447NNcourt can7448MDcan say7449VVsay ,7450,, look7451VVlook ,7452,, as7453INas a7454DTa state7455NNstate ,7456,, we7457PPwe have7458VHPhave a7459DTa no-aid7460NNno-aid clause7461NNclause clause7462NNclause .7463SENT. We7464PPwe have7465VHPhave a7466DTa principled7467JJprincipled objection7468NNobjection to7469TOto funding7470NNfunding of7471INof religious7472JJreligious institutions7473NNSinstitution ,7474,, but7475CCbut we7476PPwe understand7477VVPunderstand that7478IN/thatthat this7479DTthis sort7480NNsort of7481INof classification7482NNclassification of7483INof coercing7484VVGcoerce people7485NNSpeople on7486INon to7487TOto being7488JJbeing secular7489NNsecular is7490VBZbe a7491DTa penalty7492NNpenalty on7493INon religion7494NNreligion .7495SENT. So7496RBso to7497TOto balance7498VVbalance those7499DTthose two7500CDtwo interests7501NNSinterest ,7502,, we7503PPwe 're7504VBPbe going7505VVGgo to7506TOto simply7507RBsimply level7508VVlevel down7509RPdown .7510SENT. And7511CCand I7512PPI just7513RBjust want7514VVPwant to7515TOto be7516VBbe clear7517JJclear ,7518,, we7519PPwe 're7520VBPbe not7521RBnot defending7522VVGdefend religious7523JJreligious bigotry7524NNbigotry here7525RBhere ,7526,, okay7527JJokay ?7528SENT? I7529PPI think7530VVPthink no-aid7531NNno-aid clauses7532NNSclause have7533VHPhave a7534DTa principal7535JJprincipal justification7536NNjustification ,7537,, especially7538RBespecially in7539INin Montana7540NPMontana .7541SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7542LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well7543UHwell ,7544,, they7545PPthey 're7546VBPbe ...7547:... they7548PPthey 're7549VBPbe certainly7550RBcertainly rooted7551VVNroot in7552INin ...7553:... in7554INin grotesque7555JJgrotesque religious7556JJreligious bigotry7557NNbigotry against7558INagainst Catholics7559NPSCatholics .7560SENT. You7561PPyou agree7562VVPagree with7563INwith that7564DTthat ?7565SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7566LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I7567PPI mean7568VVPmean ,7569,, I7570PPI think7571VVPthink that7572IN/thatthat in7573INin the7574DTthe 1880s7575JJ1880s ,7576,, there7577EXthere was7578VBDbe undoubtedly7579RBundoubtedly grotesque7580JJgrotesque religious7581JJreligious bigotry7582NNbigotry against7583INagainst ...7584:... against7585INagainst Catholics7586NPSCatholics .7587SENT. I7588PPI do7589VVPdo n't7590RBn't think7591VVthink that7592WDTthat 's7593VBZbe ...7594:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7595LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] That7596DTthat was7597VBDbe the7598DTthe ...7599:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7600LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] ...7601:... comes7602VVZcome out7603RPout in7604INin the7605DTthe ...7606:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7607LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...7608:... clear7609JJclear motivation7610NNmotivation for7611INfor this7612DTthis .7613SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7614LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No7615NPNo ,7616,, not7617RBnot ...7618:... that7619WDTthat 's7620VBZbe not7621RBnot true7622JJtrue .7623SENT. In7624INin the7625DTthe 19727626CD@card@ Constitution7627NPConstitution ,7628,, which7629WDTwhich is7630VBZbe where7631WRBwhere this7632DTthis provision7633NNprovision was7634VBDbe enacted7635VVNenact ,7636,, I7637PPI do7638VVPdo n't7639RBn't think7640VVthink there7641EXthere 's7642VBZbe any7643DTany evidence7644NNevidence whatsoever7645RBwhatsoever of7646INof any7647DTany anti-religious7648JJanti-religious bigotry7649NNbigotry .7650SENT. I7651PPI think7652VVPthink the7653DTthe ...7654:... yes7655UHyes ,7656,, Your7657PP$your Honor7658NPHonor ?7659SENT? I7660PPI 'm7661VBPbe sorry7662JJsorry .7663SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]7664LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] No7665NPNo ,7666,, I7667PPI ...7668:... I7669PPI want7670VVPwant to7671TOto ...7672:... to7673TOto see7674VVsee if7675INif there7676EXthere 's7677VBZbe any7678DTany real7679JJreal difference7680NNdifference between7681INbetween this7682DTthis and7683CCand Trinity7684NPTrinity Lutheran7685NPLutheran .7686SENT. So7687RBso what7688WPwhat the7689DTthe ...7690:... excuse7691VVexcuse me7692PPme ...7693:... what7694WPwhat Article7695NPArticle X7696NPX ,7697,, Section7698NPSection 67699CD6 of7700INof the7701DTthe Montana7702NPMontana Constitution7703NPConstitution says7704VVZsay that7705IN/thatthat there7706EXthere can7707MDcan 't7708RB't be7709VBbe any7710DTany aid7711NNaid ,7712,, indirect7713JJindirect or7714CCor direct7715JJdirect ,7716,, to7717TOto any7718DTany institution7719NNinstitution ,7720,, school7721NNschool ,7722,, or7723CCor other7724JJother institution7725NNinstitution controlled7726VVNcontrol in7727INin whole7728JJwhole or7729CCor in7730INin part7731NNpart by7732INby any7733DTany church7734NNchurch ,7735,, sect7736NNsect ,7737,, or7738CCor denomination7739NNdenomination .7740SENT. So7741RBso if7742INif you7743PPyou have7744VHPhave a7745DTa school7746NNschool that7747WDTthat has7748VHZhave a7749DTa board7750NNboard of7751INof trustees7752NNStrustee and7753CCand one7754CDone or7755CCor more7756JJRmore of7757INof the7758DTthe board7759NNboard ...7760:... members7761NNSmember of7762INof the7763DTthe board7764NNboard of7765INof trustees7766NNStrustee ex7767JJex officio7768NNofficio are7769VBPbe members7770NNSmember of7771INof a7772DTa religious7773JJreligious body7774NNbody ,7775,, that7776WDTthat would7777MDwould seem7778VVseem to7779TOto provide7780VVprovide control7781NNcontrol ,7782,, in7783INin part7784NNpart .7785SENT. Would7786MDwould that7787RBthat be7788VBbe sufficient7789JJsufficient under7790INunder the7791DTthe Montana7792NPMontana Constitution7793NPConstitution ,7794,, without7795INwithout looking7796VVGlook at7797INat all7798DTall at7799INat the7800DTthe nature7801NNnature of7802INof the7803DTthe education7804NNeducation provided7805VVNprovide by7806INby the7807DTthe school7808NNschool ?7809SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7810LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No7811NPNo ,7812,, I7813PPI do7814VVPdo n't7815RBn't think7816VVthink so7817RBso .7818SENT. That7819DTthat 's7820VBZbe not7821RBnot how7822WRBhow the7823DTthe state7824NNstate court7825NNcourt has7826VHZhave construed7827VVNconstrue the7828DTthe Constitution7829NPConstitution ...7830:... [JUSTICE ALITO]7831LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Where7832WRBwhere has7833VHZhave it7834PPit said7835VVNsay ...7836:... where7837WRBwhere has7838VHZhave it7839PPit said7840VVDsay that7841IN/thatthat that7842DTthat 's7843VBZbe not7844RBnot how7845WRBhow it7846PPit 's7847VBZbe construed7848VVNconstrue ?7849SENT? That7850DTthat 's7851VBZbe control7852NNcontrol in7853INin ...7854:... in7855INin part7856NNpart .7857SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7858LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So7859RBso if7860INif you7861PPyou read7862VVPread the7863DTthe lower7864JJRlow court7865NNcourt opinion7866NNopinion ,7867,, there7868EXthere 's7869VBZbe all7870PDTall this7871DTthis language7872NNlanguage about7873INabout how7874WRBhow the7875DTthe real7876JJreal problem7877NNproblem here7878RBhere is7879VBZbe that7880IN/thatthat the7881DTthe money7882NNmoney is7883VBZbe going7884VVGgo to7885TOto the7886DTthe school7887NNschool ,7888,, which7889WDTwhich is7890VBZbe going7891VVGgo to7892TOto spend7893VVspend it7894PPit on7895INon religious7896JJreligious education7897NNeducation .7898SENT. The7899DTthe language7900NNlanguage ...7901:... [JUSTICE ALITO]7902LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well7903UHwell ,7904,, they7905PPthey 're7906VBPbe talking7907VVGtalk about7908INabout schools7909NNSschool in7910INin general7911NNgeneral .7912SENT. How7913WRBHow do7914VVPdo they7915PPthey know7916VVPknow what7917WPwhat schools7918NNSschool they7919PPthey 're7920VBPbe talking7921VVGtalk about7922RBabout ?7923SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]7924LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No7925NPNo ,7926,, they7927PPthey 're7928VBPbe ...7929:... they7930PPthey 're7931VBPbe saying7932VVGsay ...7933:... they7934PPthey 're7935VBPbe not7936RBnot talking7937VVGtalk about7938INabout schools7939NNSschool in7940INin general7941NNgeneral .7942SENT. There7943EXthere 's7944VBZbe all7945PDTall this7946DTthis language7947NNlanguage saying7948VVGsay that7949IN/thatthat money7950NNmoney is7951VBZbe going7952VVGgo to7953TOto go7954VVgo to7955TOto a7956DTa school7957NNschool and7958CCand ,7959,, therefore7960RBtherefore ,7961,, the7962DTthe money7963NNmoney ...7964:... the7965DTthe school7966NNschool is7967VBZbe going7968VVGgo to7969TOto spend7970VVspend that7971DTthat money7972NNmoney on7973INon explicitly7974RBexplicitly religious7975JJreligious education7976NNeducation .7977SENT. If7978INif I7979PPI could7980MDcould just7981RBjust step7982VVstep back7983RBback ,7984,, look7985VVlook ,7986,, I7987PPI 'm7988VBPbe agreeing7989VVGagree ...7990:... I7991PPI agree7992VVPagree that7993IN/thatthat the7994DTthe ...7995:... the7996DTthe lower7997JJRlow court7998NNcourt opinion7999NNopinion is8000VBZbe not8001RBnot completely8002RBcompletely clear8003JJclear on8004INon this8005DTthis .8006SENT. I8007PPI mean8008VVPmean ,8009,, part8010NNpart of8011INof the8012DTthe problem8013NNproblem is8014VBZbe I8015PPI think8016VVPthink that8017IN/thatthat this8018DTthis ...8019:... this8020DTthis challenge8021NNchallenge has8022VHZhave really8023RBreally changed8024VVNchange in8025INin this8026DTthis Court8027NPCourt .8028SENT. In8029INin the8030DTthe lower8031JJRlow court8032NNcourt ,8033,, it8034PPit was8035VBDbe n't8036RBn't the8037DTthe no-aid8038NNno-aid clause8039NNclause that8040WDTthat was8041VBDbe really8042RBreally being8043VBGbe challenged8044VVNchallenge ;8045:; it8046PPit was8047VBDbe the8048DTthe rule8049NNrule .8050SENT. And8051CCand so8052RBso I8053PPI do8054VVPdo n't8055RBn't think8056VVthink ...8057:... I8058PPI mean8059VVPmean ,8060,, I8061PPI think8062VVPthink the8063DTthe state8064NNstate courts8065NNScourt in8066INin general8067NNgeneral should8068MDshould be8069VBbe entitled8070VVNentitle to8071TOto adopt8072VVadopt limiting8073VVGlimit constructions8074NNSconstruction of8075INof their8076PP$their own8077JJown state8078NNstate constitutions8079NNSconstitution .8080SENT. I8081PPI just8082RBjust do8083VVPdo n't8084RBn't think8085VVthink the8086DTthe state8087NNstate court8088NNcourt had8089VHDhave the8090DTthe chance8091NNchance to8092TOto do8093VVdo that8094IN/thatthat here8095RBhere because8096INbecause the8097DTthe argument8098NNargument was8099VBDbe n't8100RBn't really8101RBreally raised8102VVNraise .8103SENT. And8104CCand I8105PPI think8106VVPthink it8107PPit would8108MDwould be8109VBbe a8110DTa little8111RBlittle unfair8112JJunfair in8113INin this8114DTthis Court8115NPCourt to8116TOto sort8117VVsort of8118INof assume8119VVassume the8120DTthe broadest8121JJSbroad possible8122JJpossible interpretation8123NNinterpretation of8124INof the8125DTthe state8126NNstate constitution8127NNconstitution just8128RBjust for8129INfor purposes8130NNSpurpose of8131INof ...8132:... of8133INof like8134INlike invalidating8135VVGinvalidate it8136PPit .8137SENT. At8138INat minimum8139NNminimum ...8140:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8141LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] May8142MDmay I8143PPI ask8144VVask you8145PPyou a8146DTa question8147NNquestion ?8148SENT? Let8149VVlet 's8150VBZbe go8151VVgo back8152RBback to8153TOto the8154DTthe basic8155JJbasic ,8156,, okay8157JJokay ?8158SENT? Let8159VVlet 's8160VBZbe take8161VVtake the8162DTthe proposition8163NNproposition here8164RBhere that8165IN/thatthat the8166DTthe law8167NNlaw as8168INas written8169JJwritten giving8170VVGgive aid8171NNaid discriminated8172VVDdiscriminate .8173SENT. I8174PPI know8175VVPknow you8176PPyou 're8177VBPbe challenge8178NNchallenge that8179IN/thatthat ,8180,, okay8181JJokay ?8182SENT? But8183CCbut that8184IN/thatthat it8185PPit violates8186VVZviolate the8187DTthe U8188NPU .8189SENT. S8190NPS .8191SENT. Constitution8192NPConstitution ...8193:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8194LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yes8195NPYes .8196SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8197LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...8198:... because8199INbecause ...8200:... Rule8201NNrule does8202VVZdo because8203INbecause it8204PPit permits8205VVZpermit secular8206JJsecular schools8207NNSschool but8208CCbut not8209RBnot religious8210JJreligious schools8211NNSschool from8212INfrom receiving8213VVGreceive the8214DTthe scholarship8215NNscholarship .8216SENT. I8217PPI know8218VVPknow you8219PPyou take8220VVtake as8221INas a8222DTa defense8223NNdefense position8224NNposition that8225IN/thatthat they8226PPthey can8227MDcan do8228VVdo that8229DTthat .8230SENT. Putting8231VVGput that8232IN/thatthat aside8233RBaside ,8234,, you8235PPyou 're8236VBPbe wrong8237JJwrong .8238SENT. Assume8239VVassume that8240DTthat .8241SENT. Okay8242JJokay ?8243SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8244LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I8245PPI accept8246VVPaccept I8247PPI 'm8248VBPbe wrong8249JJwrong ,8250,, yes8251UHyes .8252SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8253LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] All8254DTall right8255NNright .8256SENT. Now8257RBnow ,8258,, there8259EXthere was8260VBDbe a8261DTa suggestion8262NNsuggestion in8263INin an8264DTan earlier8265JJRearly question8266NNquestion that8267IN/thatthat if8268INif you8269PPyou were8270VBDbe wrong8271JJwrong ,8272,, and8273CCand the8274DTthe Montana8275NPMontana Supreme8276NPSupreme Court8277NPCourt in8278INin turn8279NNturn uses8280VVZuse the8281DTthe Montana8282NPMontana Constitution8283NPConstitution to8284TOto level8285VVlevel down8286RBdown ,8287,, that8288IN/thatthat it8289PPit is8290VBZbe unconstitutionally8291RBunconstitutionally acting8292VVGact ,8293,, that8294IN/thatthat it8295PPit is8296VBZbe using8297VVGuse religion8298NNreligion to8299TOto level8300VVlevel down8301RPdown .8302SENT. How8303WRBHow do8304VVPdo you8305PPyou answer8306VVanswer that8307DTthat argument8308NNargument ?8309SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8310LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Because8311INbecause ...8312:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8313LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Because8314INbecause that8315WDTthat 's8316VBZbe exactly8317RBexactly what8318WPwhat we8319PPwe were8320VBDbe told8321VVNtell in8322INin a8323DTa question8324NNquestion ,8325,, which8326WDTwhich is8327VBZbe they8328PPthey are8329VBPbe basing8330VVGbase the8331DTthe leveling8332NNleveling down8333RBdown on8334INon the8335DTthe basis8336NNbasis of8337INof discriminating8338VVGdiscriminate against8339INagainst religion8340NNreligion .8341SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8342LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So8343INso I8344PPI think8345VVPthink that8346IN/thatthat the8347DTthe answering8348NNanswering of8349INof that8350DTthat question8351NNquestion requires8352VVZrequire a8353DTa kind8354NNkind of8355INof focused8356VVNfocus analysis8357NNanalysis of8358INof exactly8359RBexactly what8360WPwhat the8361DTthe Constitution8362NPConstitution allows8363VVZallow and8364CCand does8365VVZdo n't8366RBn't allow8367VVallow ,8368,, all8369DTall right8370NNright ?8371SENT? So8372RBso if8373INif you8374PPyou accept8375VVPaccept the8376DTthe premise8377NNpremise that8378IN/thatthat Rule8379NPRule is8380VBZbe unconstitutional8381JJunconstitutional because8382INbecause it8383PPit discriminates8384VVZdiscriminate ,8385,, it8386PPit says8387VVZsay secular8388JJsecular schools8389NNSschool in8390INin and8391CCand religious8392JJreligious schools8393NNSschool out8394RBout ,8395,, that8396WDTthat does8397VVZdo n't8398RBn't answer8399VVanswer the8400DTthe question8401NNquestion of8402INof whether8403INwhether the8404DTthe mere8405JJmere application8406NNapplication of8407INof a8408DTa no-aid8409NNno-aid clause8410NNclause that8411WDTthat does8412VVZdo not8413RBnot lead8414VVlead to8415TOto a8416DTa judgment8417NNjudgment with8418INwith that8419DTthat effect8420NNeffect is8421VBZbe also8422RBalso unconstitutional8423JJunconstitutional .8424SENT. So8425RBso I8426PPI think8427VVPthink the8428DTthe crucial8429JJcrucial point8430NNpoint in8431INin this8432DTthis case8433NNcase is8434VBZbe to8435TOto look8436VVlook at8437INat what8438WPwhat the8439DTthe state8440NNstate court8441NNcourt did8442VVDdo when8443WRBwhen it8444PPit applied8445VVDapply the8446DTthe no-aid8447NNno-aid clause8448NNclause .8449SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]8450LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] No8451NPNo ,8452,, is8453VBZbe n't8454RBn't the8455DTthe crucial8456JJcrucial question8457NNquestion why8458WRBwhy the8459DTthe state8460NNstate court8461NNcourt did8462VVDdo what8463WPwhat it8464PPit did8465VVDdo ?8466SENT? If8467INif it8468PPit did8469VVDdo what8470WPwhat it8471PPit did8472VVDdo for8473INfor an8474DTan unconstitutionally8475RBunconstitutionally discriminatory8476JJdiscriminatory reason8477NNreason ,8478,, then8479RBthen there8480EXthere 's8481VBZbe a8482DTa problem8483NNproblem under8484INunder Village8485NPVillage of8486INof Arlington8487NPArlington Heights8488NPHeights .8489SENT. So8490RBso I8491PPI 'll8492MDwill give8493VVgive you8494PPyou an8495DTan example8496NNexample .8497SENT. The8498DTthe state8499NNstate legislature8500NNlegislature sets8501VVZset up8502RPup a8503DTa scholarship8504NNscholarship fund8505NNfund ,8506,, and8507CCand after8508INafter a8509DTa while8510NNwhile ,8511,, people8512NNSpeople look8513VVPlook at8514INat the8515DTthe ...8516:... the8517DTthe recipients8518NNSrecipient of8519INof the8520DTthe scholarships8521NNSscholarship ,8522,, and8523CCand some8524DTsome people8525NNSpeople say8526VVPsay :8527:: Wow8528NNwow ,8529,, these8530DTthese are8531VBPbe mostly8532RBmostly going8533VVGgo to8534TOto blacks8535NNSblack and8536CCand we8537PPwe do8538VVPdo n't8539RBn't like8540VVlike that8541IN/thatthat and8542CCand that8543DTthat 's8544VBZbe contrary8545JJcontrary to8546TOto state8547NNstate law8548NNlaw .8549SENT. So8550INso the8551DTthe state8552NNstate supreme8553NNsupreme court8554NNcourt says8555VVZsay :8556:: Okay8557JJokay ,8558,, that8559DTthat discrimination8560NNdiscrimination is8561VBZbe ...8562:... we8563PPwe 're8564VBPbe going8565VVGgo to8566TOto strike8567VVstrike down8568RPdown the8569DTthe whole8570JJwhole thing8571NNthing .8572SENT. Is8573VBZbe that8574IN/thatthat constitutional8575JJconstitutional ?8576SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8577LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No8578NPNo ,8579,, so8580RBso we8581PPwe do8582VVPdo n't8583RBn't think8584VVthink the8585DTthe race8586NNrace analogy8587NNanalogy is8588VBZbe apt8589JJapt .8590SENT. I8591PPI do8592VVPdo n't8593RBn't think8594VVthink that8595WDTthat 's8596VBZbe constitutional8597JJconstitutional ,8598,, and8599CCand we8600PPwe just8601RBjust do8602VVPdo n't8603RBn't think8604VVthink that8605DTthat race8606NNrace and8607CCand religion8608NNreligion are8609VBPbe identical8610JJidentical for8611INfor all8612DTall constitutional8613JJconstitutional ...8614:... [JUSTICE BREYER]8615LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] What8616WPWhat they8617PPthey 're8618VBPbe ...8619:... what8620WPwhat he8621PPhe 's8622VBZbe saying8623VVGsay is8624VBZbe that8625IN/thatthat ,8626,, look8627VVlook ,8628,, the8629DTthe Court8630NPCourt took8631VVDtake the8632DTthe case8633NNcase in8634INin the8635DTthe Prince8636NPPrince ...8637:... Prince8638NPPrince Edward8639NPEdward County8640NPCounty thing8641NNthing ...8642:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8643LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yes8644NPYes .8645SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8646LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...8647:... or8648CCor the8649DTthe equivalent8650NNequivalent and8651CCand said8652VVDsay they8653PPthey could8654MDcould n't8655RBn't do8656VVdo that8657DTthat .8658SENT. They8659PPthey can8660MDcan 't8661RB't shut8662VVDshut down8663RBdown all8664PDTall the8665DTthe schools8666NNSschool ,8667,, even8668RBeven though8669INthough the8670DTthe Constitution8671NPConstitution they8672PPthey did8673VVDdo n't8674RBn't say8675VVPsay had8676VHDhave a8677DTa right8678NNright and8679CCand so8680RBso that8681WDTthat 's8682VBZbe the8683DTthe similarity8684NNsimilarity .8685SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8686LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So8687INso I8688PPI ...8689:... I8690PPI assume8691VVPassume the8692DTthe ...8693:... [JUSTICE BREYER]8694LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I8695PPI think8696VVPthink ,8697,, Justice8698NPJustice ...8699:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8700LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I8701PPI have8702VHPhave an8703DTan answer8704NNanswer ...8705:... [JUSTICE BREYER]8706LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But8707CCbut I8708PPI have8709VHPhave ...8710:... I8711PPI 'd8712MDwould like8713VVlike you8714PPyou to8715TOto think8716VVthink about8717INabout that8718DTthat ...8719:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8720LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Look8721NNlook ...8722:... [JUSTICE BREYER]8723LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...8724:... but8725CCbut I8726PPI have8727VHPhave a8728DTa more8729RBRmore direct8730JJdirect question8731NNquestion on8732INon the8733DTthe merits8734NNSmerit .8735SENT. Sorry8736RBsorry .8737SENT. Look8738NNlook ,8739,, the8740DTthe state8741NNstate says8742VVZsay Catholic8743JJCatholic schools8744NNSschool get8745VVPget some8746DTsome money8747NNmoney ;8748:; Jewish8749JJJewish schools8750NNSschool do8751VVPdo n't8752RBn't .8753SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8754LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yeah8755NPYeah .8756SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8757LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] All8758DTall right8759NNright ?8760SENT? No8761DTno problem8762NNproblem ,8763,, unconstitutional8764JJunconstitutional ,8765,, free8766JJfree exercise8767NNexercise ,8768,, right8769RBright ?8770SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8771LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] And8772CCand establishment8773NNestablishment ,8774,, yes8775UHyes .8776SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8777LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Okay8778NPOkay .8779SENT. The8780DTthe ...8781:... the8782DTthe state8783NNstate says8784VVZsay :8785:: We8786PPwe 'll8787MDwill give8788VVgive police8789NNpolice protection8790NNprotection to8791TOto all8792DTall schools8793NNSschool ,8794,, all8795DTall people8796NNSpeople ,8797,, but8798CCbut no8799DTno religious8800JJreligious institution8801NNinstitution .8802SENT. That's8803NNSThat's ...8804:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8805LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] That8806DTthat ...8807:... that8808DTthat ...8809:... [JUSTICE BREYER]8810LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...8811:... unconstitutional8812JJunconstitutional .8813SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8814LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] That8815DTthat 's8816VBZbe Trinity8817NPTrinity Lutheran8818NPLutheran .8819SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8820LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Clearly8821RBclearly .8822SENT. Okay8823JJokay .8824SENT. Yeah8825UHYeah .8826SENT. Correct8827JJcorrect .8828SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8829LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yeah8830NPYeah .8831SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8832LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Now8833RBnow ,8834,, why8835WRBwhy is8836VBZbe it8837PPit different8838JJdifferent ?8839SENT? And8840CCand I8841PPI 'm8842VBPbe not8843RBnot saying8844VVGsay it8845PPit is8846VBZbe n't8847RBn't .8848SENT. I8849PPI want8850VVPwant to8851TOto know8852VVknow your8853PP$your reason8854NNreason why8855WRBwhy is8856VBZbe it8857PPit different8858JJdifferent ?8859SENT? Oh8860UHoh ,8861,, try8862VVtry it8863PPit the8864DTthe opposite8865JJopposite extreme8866NNextreme .8867SENT. The8868DTthe state8869NNstate says8870VVZsay :8871:: We8872PPwe will8873MDwill pay8874VVpay for8875INfor the8876DTthe salaries8877NNSsalary of8878INof priests8879NNSpriest if8880INif they8881PPthey 're8882VBPbe Mohammedan8883JJMohammedan but8884CCbut not8885RBnot if8886INif they8887PPthey 're8888VBPbe Buddhist8889NNBuddhist .8890SENT. Unconstitutional8891JJunconstitutional ,8892,, right8893RBright ?8894SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8895LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yeah8896NPYeah .8897SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8898LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Okay8899NPOkay .8900SENT. So8901RBso why8902WRBwhy does8903VVZdo n't8904RBn't it8905PPit also8906RBalso violate8907VVPviolate the8908DTthe Constitution8909NPConstitution were8910VBDbe the8911DTthe state8912NNstate to8913TOto say8914VVsay we8915PPwe won8916MDwill 't8917RB't pay8918VVpay the8919DTthe salaries8920NNSsalary of8921INof any8922DTany priests8923NNSpriest but8924CCbut we8925PPwe will8926MDwill pay8927VVpay the8928DTthe head8929NNhead of8930INof every8931DTevery other8932JJother organization8933NNorganization ?8934SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8935LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Well8936UHwell ,8937,, I8938PPI think8939VVPthink that8940DTthat ...8941:... [JUSTICE BREYER]8942LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I8943PPI mean8944VVPmean ,8945,, you8946PPyou see8947VVPsee where8948WRBwhere I'm8949NPI'm ...8950:... you8951PPyou see8952VVPsee ...8953:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8954LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yes8955NPYes .8956SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8957LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...8958:... how8959WRBhow I8960PPI 'm8961VBPbe doing8962VVGdo that8963RBthat ?8964SENT? You8965PPyou see8966VVPsee the8967DTthe point8968NNpoint ?8969SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]8970LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So8971RBso let8972VVDlet me8973PPme ...8974:... let8975VVlet me8976PPme answer8977VVanswer that8978DTthat question8979NNquestion and8980CCand then8981RBthen go8982VVgo back8983RBback to8984TOto the8985DTthe race8986NNrace question8987NNquestion I8988PPI would8989MDwould like8990VVlike to8991TOto address8992VVaddress .8993SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]8994LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Okay8995NPOkay .8996SENT. You8997PPyou do8998VVPdo n't8999RBn't have9000VHhave to9001TOto answer9002VVanswer if9003INif you9004PPyou do9005VVPdo n't9006RBn't want9007VVwant to9008TOto .9009SENT. [9010SYM[ LAUGHTER9011NNlaughter ]9012SYM] [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9013LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Well9014UHWell ,9015,, I'll9016NPI'll ...9017:... I9018PPI 'll9019MDwill give9020VVgive a9021DTa ...9022:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9023LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I9024PPI recommend9025VVPrecommend it9026PPit ,9027,, though9028RBthough .9029SENT. [9030SYM[ LAUGHTER9031NNlaughter ]9032SYM] [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9033LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I9034PPI 'll9035MDwill give9036VVgive a9037DTa brief9038JJbrief answer9039NNanswer .9040SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9041LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah9042NPYeah .9043SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9044LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So9045INso I9046PPI think9047VVPthink that9048IN/thatthat there9049EXthere 's9050VBZbe a9051DTa constitutional9052JJconstitutional difference9053NNdifference between9054INbetween distinguishing9055VVGdistinguish among9056INamong religions9057NNSreligion and9058CCand saying9059VVGsay the9060DTthe Court9061NNcourt is9062VBZbe ...9063:... the9064DTthe government9065NNgovernment is9066VBZbe just9067RBjust going9068VVGgo to9069TOto stay9070VVstay out9071RPout of9072INof religion9073NNreligion altogether9074RBaltogether .9075SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9076LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] That9077DTthat 's9078VBZbe correct9079JJcorrect .9080SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9081LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] There9082RBthere 's9083POS's many9084JJmany Establishment9085NNestablishment Clause9086NNclause cases9087NNScase saying9088VVGsay that9089IN/thatthat regardless9090RBregardless of9091INof whether9092INwhether there9093EXthere 's9094VBZbe a9095DTa civil9096JJcivil liberties9097NNSliberty violation9098NNviolation ,9099,, it9100PPit 's9101VBZbe just9102RBjust contrary9103JJcontrary to9104TOto ...9105:... to9106TOto disestablishment9107NNdisestablishment principles9108NNSprinciple to9109TOto say9110VVsay that9111IN/thatthat we9112PPwe 're9113VBPbe going9114VVGgo to9115TOto treat9116VVtreat one9117CDone religion9118NNreligion ...9119:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9120LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Okay9121NPOkay ,9122,, I9123PPI got9124VVDget that9125RBthat .9126SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9127LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] ...9128:... totally9129RBtotally different9130JJdifferent from9131INfrom another9132DTanother one9133CDone .9134SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9135LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] So9136INso what9137WPwhat about9138INabout the9139DTthe other9140JJother part9141NNpart ,9142,, where9143WRBwhere we9144PPwe said9145VVDsay ,9146,, look9147VVPlook ,9148,, you9149PPyou can9150MDcan 't9151RB't discriminate9152JJdiscriminate against9153INagainst all9154DTall religions9155NNSreligion by9156INby not9157RBnot giving9158VVGgive them9159PPthem playgrounds9160NNSplayground or9161CCor you9162PPyou can9163MDcan 't9164RB't discriminate9165JJdiscriminate against9166INagainst all9167DTall religions9168NNSreligion by9169INby refusing9170VVGrefuse to9171TOto give9172VVgive them9173PPthem police9174VVpolice protection9175NNprotection or9176CCor fire9177NNfire protection9178NNprotection ?9179SENT? What9180WPWhat about9181INabout that9182DTthat part9183NNpart ?9184SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9185LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] All9186DTall right9187NNright .9188SENT. So9189RBso there9190RBthere ...9191:... there9192EXthere 's9193VBZbe two9194CDtwo differences9195NNSdifference between9196INbetween that9197DTthat case9198NNcase and9199CCand this9200DTthis one9201CDone .9202SENT. One9203PPone is9204VBZbe the9205DTthe striking9206VVGstrike down9207RPdown of9208INof the9209DTthe whole9210JJwhole program9211NNprogram ,9212,, which9213WDTwhich we9214PPwe 've9215VHPhave talked9216VVNtalk about9217RBabout throughout9218INthroughout the9219DTthe argument9220NNargument today9221NNtoday ,9222,, and9223CCand then9224RBthen there9225EXthere 's9226VBZbe a9227DTa second9228JJsecond point9229NNpoint which9230WDTwhich has9231VHZhave n't9232RBn't really9233RBreally come9234VVcome up9235RPup ,9236,, which9237WDTwhich is9238VBZbe sort9239NNsort of9240INof the9241DTthe Locke9242NPLocke v9243NNv .9244SENT. Davey9245NPDavey distinction9246NNdistinction between9247INbetween a9248DTa declination9249NNdeclination to9250TOto fund9251VVfund religious9252JJreligious education9253NNeducation and9254CCand refusing9255VVGrefuse funding9256NNfunding merely9257RBmerely because9258INbecause someone9259NNsomeone happens9260VVZhappen to9261TOto be9262VBbe religious9263JJreligious for9264INfor a9265DTa completely9266RBcompletely non-religious9267JJnon-religious purpose9268NNpurpose .9269SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9270LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Does9271VVZdo ...9272:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9273LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] And9274CCand I9275PPI think9276VVPthink that9277DTthat ...9278:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9279LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Does9280VVZdo ...9281:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]9282LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Can9283MDcan I9284PPI take9285VVtake you9286PPyou back9287RBback ,9288,, Mr9289NPMr .9290SENT. Unikowsky9291NPUnikowsky ,9292,, to9293TOto the9294DTthe striking9295VVGstrike down9296RPdown the9297DTthe whole9298JJwhole program9299NNprogram ?9300SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9301LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yes9302NPYes .9303SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]9304LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Because9305INbecause a9306DTa number9307NNnumber of9308INof people9309NNSpeople have9310VHPhave suggested9311VVNsuggest that9312IN/thatthat that9313WDTthat must9314MDmust be9315VBbe motivated9316VVNmotivate by9317INby animus9318NNanimus towards9319INtowards religion9320NNreligion .9321SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9322LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Right9323NPRight .9324SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]9325LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] And9326CCand I9327PPI can9328MDcan think9329VVthink of9330INof many9331JJmany reasons9332NNSreason why9333WRBwhy you9334PPyou would9335MDwould strike9336VVstrike down9337RPdown the9338DTthe whole9339JJwhole program9340NNprogram that9341WDTthat have9342VHPhave nothing9343NNnothing to9344TOto do9345VVdo with9346INwith animus9347NNanimus toward9348INtoward religion9349NNreligion .9350SENT. You9351PPyou might9352MDmight actually9353RBactually think9354VVthink that9355DTthat funding9356NNfunding religion9357NNreligion imposes9358VVZimpose costs9359NNScost and9360CCand burdens9361NNSburden on9362INon religious9363JJreligious institutions9364NNSinstitution themselves9365PPthemselves .9366SENT. You9367PPyou might9368MDmight think9369VVthink that9370IN/thatthat taxpayers9371NNStaxpayer have9372VHPhave conscientious9373JJconscientious objections9374NNSobjection to9375TOto funding9376NNfunding religion9377NNreligion .9378SENT. You9379PPyou might9380MDmight think9381VVthink that9382DTthat funding9383NNfunding religion9384NNreligion creates9385VVZcreate divisiveness9386NNdivisiveness and9387CCand conflict9388NNconflict within9389INwithin a9390DTa society9391NNsociety ,9392,, and9393CCand that9394IN/thatthat for9395INfor all9396PDTall those9397DTthose reasons9398NNSreason ,9399,, funding9400VVGfund religious9401JJreligious activity9402NNactivity is9403VBZbe not9404RBnot a9405DTa good9406JJgood idea9407NNidea and9408CCand that9409IN/thatthat you9410PPyou would9411MDwould rather9412RBrather level9413VVlevel down9414RPdown and9415CCand fund9416VVfund no9417DTno comparable9418JJcomparable activity9419NNactivity ,9420,, whether9421INwhether religious9422JJreligious or9423CCor otherwise9424RBotherwise ,9425,, than9426INthan fund9427NNfund both9428DTboth .9429SENT. Now9430RBnow ,9431,, none9432NNnone of9433INof those9434DTthose things9435NNSthing have9436VHPhave anything9437NNanything to9438TOto do9439VVdo with9440INwith animus9441NNanimus towards9442INtowards religion9443NNreligion ,9444,, and9445CCand 219446CD@card@ I9447PPI ...9448:... I9449PPI ...9450:... I9451PPI ...9452:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9453LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So9454INso I9455PPI think9456VVPthink that9457WDTthat 's9458VBZbe right9459JJright ,9460,, and9461CCand I9462PPI think9463VVPthink that9464DTthat 's9465VBZbe why9466WRBwhy we9467PPwe do9468VVPdo n't9469RBn't think9470VVthink the9471DTthe race9472NNrace analogy9473NNanalogy is9474VBZbe apt9475JJapt .9476SENT. And9477CCand I9478PPI think9479VVPthink it9480PPit 's9481VBZbe useful9482JJuseful to9483TOto talk9484VVtalk about9485RBabout why9486WRBwhy the9487DTthe no-aid9488NNno-aid clause9489NNclause was9490VBDbe enacted9491VVNenact based9492VVNbase on9493INon the9494DTthe convention9495NNconvention 's9496POS's discussions9497NNSdiscussion in9498INin 19729499CD@card@ and9500CCand why9501WRBwhy it9502PPit makes9503VVZmake sense9504NNsense that9505IN/thatthat those9506DTthose justifications9507NNSjustification would9508MDwould result9509VVresult in9510INin ...9511:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9512LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Why9513WRBwhy ...9514:... why9515WRBwhy does9516VVZdo that9517RBthat explain9518VVexplain why9519WRBwhy the9520DTthe race9521NNrace analogy9522NNanalogy is9523VBZbe inapt9524JJinapt ?9525SENT? I9526PPI mean9527VVPmean ,9528,, the9529DTthe legislature9530NNlegislature may9531MDmay say9532VVsay they9533PPthey built9534VVNbuild parks9535NNSpark and9536CCand pools9537NNSpool ,9538,, and9539CCand they9540PPthey say9541VVPsay funding9542VVGfund those9543DTthose ,9544,, but9545CCbut if9546INif a9547DTa higher9548JJRhigh percentage9549NNpercentage of9550INof African9551JJAfrican Americans9552NPSAmericans come9553VVPcome and9554CCand use9555VVPuse the9556DTthe pools9557NNSpool ,9558,, then9559RBthen we9560PPwe 're9561VBPbe going9562VVGgo to9563TOto shut9564VVshut down9565RPdown the9566DTthe whole9567JJwhole program9568NNprogram .9569SENT. And9570CCand you9571PPyou would9572MDwould n't9573RBn't defend9574VVdefend that9575IN/thatthat on9576INon saying9577VVGsay they9578PPthey could9579MDcould have9580VHhave a9581DTa judgment9582NNjudgment that9583IN/thatthat it9584PPit decreases9585VVZdecrease tensions9586NNStension among9587INamong the9588DTthe different9589JJdifferent races9590NNSrace to9591TOto keep9592VVkeep them9593PPthem ...9594:... no9595UHno ,9596,, you9597PPyou would9598MDwould just9599RBjust look9600VVlook at9601INat the9602DTthe facial9603JJfacial discrimination9604NNdiscrimination ,9605,, right9606RBright ,9607,, and9608CCand conclude9609VVconclude the9610DTthe fact9611NNfact that9612WDTthat ...9613:... that9614WDTthat would9615MDwould n't9616RBn't be9617VBbe good9618JJgood under9619INunder your9620PP$your view9621NNview ,9622,, would9623MDwould it9624PPit ?9625SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9626LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Of9627INof course9628NNcourse not9629RBnot ...9630:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9631LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Because9632INbecause they9633PPthey 're9634VBPbe shutting9635VVGshut down9636RPdown the9637DTthe whole9638NNwhole ...9639:... [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9640LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No9641NPNo .9642SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9643LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] ...9644:... program9645NNprogram ?9646SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9647LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No9648NPNo .9649SENT. Of9650INof course9651NNcourse not9652RBnot .9653SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9654LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] How9655WRBHow is9656VBZbe that9657IN/thatthat different9658JJdifferent than9659INthan religion9660NNreligion ,9661,, which9662WDTwhich is9663VBZbe also9664RBalso protected9665VVNprotect under9666INunder ...9667:... under9668INunder the9669DTthe First9670NPFirst Amendment9671NPAmendment ?9672SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9673LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Because9674INbecause I9675PPI do9676VVPdo n't9677RBn't think9678VVthink that9679DTthat race9680NNrace and9681CCand religion9682NNreligion are9683VBPbe identical9684JJidentical for9685INfor all9686DTall constitutional9687JJconstitutional purposes9688NNSpurpose ,9689,, right9690RBright ?9691SENT? Look9692NNlook ...9693:... look9694VVlook ,9695,, if9696INif a9697DTa state9698NNstate constitution9699NNconstitution had9700VHDhave a9701DTa provision9702NNprovision saying9703VVGsay that9704IN/thatthat like9705INlike historically9706RBhistorically black9707JJblack colleges9708NNScollege are9709VBPbe n't9710RBn't entitled9711VVNentitle to9712TOto any9713DTany aid9714NNaid at9715INat all9716DTall ,9717,, that9718WDTthat would9719MDwould obviously9720RBobviously be9721VBbe facially9722RBfacially unconstitutional9723JJunconstitutional .9724SENT. You9725PPyou would9726MDwould n't9727RBn't even9728RBeven need9729VVPneed to9730TOto get9731VVget to9732TOto these9733DTthese as-applied9734JJas-applied challenges9735NNSchallenge at9736INat all9737DTall because9738INbecause I9739PPI think9740VVPthink the9741DTthe equal-protection9742NNequal-protection clause9743NNclause embodies9744VVZembody a9745DTa judgment9746NNjudgment that9747IN/thatthat race9748NNrace is9749VBZbe never9750RBnever ,9751,, ever9752RBever a9753DTa permissible9754JJpermissible criterion9755NNcriterion in9756INin any9757DTany government9758NNgovernment decision9759NNdecision making9760VVGmake at9761INat all9762DTall ,9763,, regardless9764RBregardless ...9765:... unless9766INunless strict9767JJstrict scrutiny9768NNscrutiny is9769VBZbe satisfied9770VVNsatisfy ,9771,, which9772WDTwhich is9773VBZbe very9774RBvery ,9775,, very9776RBvery difficult9777JJdifficult .9778SENT. And9779CCand ...9780:... and9781CCand I9782PPI do9783VVPdo n't9784RBn't think9785VVthink the9786DTthe rule9787NNrule is9788VBZbe the9789DTthe same9790JJsame in9791INin religion9792NNreligion .9793SENT. But9794CCbut later9795RBRlater this9796DTthis term9797NNterm ,9798,, this9799DTthis Court9800NPCourt 's9801VBZbe about9802RBabout to9803TOto hear9804VVhear a9805DTa case9806NNcase involving9807VVGinvolve exemptions9808NNSexemption of9809INof religious9810JJreligious schools9811NNSschool from9812INfrom anti-9813NNanti- discrimination9814NNdiscrimination laws9815NNSlaw .9816SENT. That9817DTthat distinguishes9818VVZdistinguish between9819INbetween ...9820:... that9821DTthat ...9822:... that9823WDTthat creates9824VVZcreate a9825DTa sort9826NNsort of9827INof religious9828JJreligious classification9829NNclassification but9830CCbut that9831DTthat does9832VVZdo ...9833:... that9834WDTthat 's9835VBZbe not9836RBnot intrinsically9837RBintrinsically unconstitutional9838JJunconstitutional .9839SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9840LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Was9841VBDbe that9842DTthat ...9843:... was9844VBDbe that9845IN/thatthat your9846PP$your answer9847NNanswer to9848TOto Justice9849NPJustice Kagan9850NPKagan 's9851POS's question9852NNquestion ?9853SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9854LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] No9855NPNo ,9856,, so9857RBso ...9858:... well9859RBwell ...9860:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9861LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well9862UHWell ,9863,, I9864PPI ...9865:... go9866VVPgo ahead9867RBahead .9868SENT. I9869PPI 'd9870MDwould like9871VVlike to9872TOto give9873VVgive you9874PPyou the9875DTthe chance9876NNchance to9877TOto do9878VVdo that9879DTthat .9880SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]9881LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] The9882DTthe answer9883NNanswer is9884VBZbe ,9885,, I9886PPI think9887VVPthink if9888INif you9889PPyou accept9890VVPaccept that9891IN/thatthat no-aid9892NNno-aid clauses9893NNSclause are9894VBPbe not9895RBnot facially9896RBfacially unconstitutional9897JJunconstitutional ,9898,, and9899CCand I9900PPI think9901VVPthink it9902PPit 's9903VBZbe a9904DTa hard9905JJhard argument9906NNargument to9907TOto make9908VVmake for9909INfor all9910PDTall the9911DTthe historical9912JJhistorical reasons9913NNSreason ,9914,, they9915PPthey 've9916VHPhave existed9917VVNexist for9918INfor such9919PDTsuch a9920DTa long9921JJlong time9922NNtime ,9923,, then9924RBthen you9925PPyou have9926VHPhave to9927TOto accept9928VVaccept that9929IN/thatthat it9930PPit 's9931VBZbe at9932INat least9933JJSleast permissible9934JJpermissible for9935INfor a9936DTa state9937NNstate to9938TOto say9939VVsay ,9940,, for9941INfor principled9942JJprincipled reasons9943NNSreason deeply9944RBdeeply rooted9945VVNroot in9946INin national9947JJnational tradition9948NNtradition dating9949VVGdate back9950RBback to9951TOto Madison9952NPMadison ,9953,, we9954PPwe have9955VHPhave a9956DTa preference9957NNpreference to9958TOto not9959RBnot fund9960VVfund religious9961JJreligious activities9962NNSactivity ,9963,, not9964RBnot prohibit9965VVprohibit it9966PPit but9967CCbut not9968RBnot fund9969VVfund it9970PPit .9971SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]9972LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] But9973CCbut there9974EXthere 's9975VBZbe a9976DTa difference9977NNdifference between9978INbetween saying9979VVGsay we9980PPwe 're9981VBPbe not9982RBnot going9983VVGgo to9984TOto fund9985VVfund religious9986JJreligious activities9987NNSactivity and9988CCand saying9989VVGsay we9990PPwe 're9991VBPbe going9992VVGgo to9993TOto discriminate9994VVdiscriminate based9995VVNbase on9996INon religion9997NNreligion .9998SENT. That9999DTthat 's10000VBZbe the10001DTthe point10002NNpoint .10003SENT. They10004PPthey ...10005:... the10006DTthe state10007NNstate ...10008:... nobody10009NNnobody 's10010VBZbe claiming10011VVGclaim the10012DTthe state10013NNstate has10014VHZhave an10015DTan obligation10016NNobligation to10017TOto make10018VVmake particular10019JJparticular grants10020NNSgrant to10021TOto religious10022JJreligious institutions10023NNSinstitution or10024CCor to10025TOto provide10026VVprovide any10027DTany funding10028NNfunding for10029INfor private10030JJprivate education10031NNeducation at10032INat all10033DTall .10034SENT. The10035DTthe question10036NNquestion is10037VBZbe ,10038,, can10039MDcan they10040PPthey ...10041:... if10042INif ...10043:... if10044INif ...10045:... if10046INif there10047EXthere is10048VBZbe a10049DTa program10050NNprogram that10051WDTthat is10052VBZbe ...10053:... that10054WDTthat 's10055VBZbe ...10056:... is10057VBZbe designed10058VVNdesign to10059TOto serve10060VVserve certain10061JJcertain purposes10062NNSpurpose ,10063,, can10064MDcan they10065PPthey discriminate10066VVdiscriminate in10067INin the10068DTthe application10069NNapplication of10070INof the10071DTthe ...10072:... in10073INin the10074DTthe ...10075:... in10076INin the10077DTthe ...10078:... deciding10079VVGdecide who10080WPwho 's10081VBZbe going10082VVGgo to10083TOto get10084VVget the10085DTthe benefit10086NNbenefit of10087INof it10088PPit on10089INon the10090DTthe basis10091NNbasis of10092INof religious10093JJreligious affiliation10094NNaffiliation ?10095SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]10096LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I10097PPI think10098VVPthink what10099WPwhat ...10100:... so10101INso that10102WDTthat sounds10103VVZsound more10104JJRmore like10105INlike the10106DTthe Trinity10107NPTrinity Lutheran10108NPLutheran hypothetical10109JJhypothetical .10110SENT. I10111PPI think10112VVPthink what10113WPwhat state10114NNstate ...10115:... there10116EXthere are10117VBPbe certain10118JJcertain things10119NNSthing a10120DTa state10121NNstate can10122MDcan 't10123RB't do10124VVdo and10125CCand certain10126JJcertain things10127NNSthing a10128DTa state10129NNstate can10130MDcan do10131VVdo .10132SENT. What10133WPWhat I10134PPI think10135VVPthink a10136DTa state10137NNstate can10138MDcan do10139VVdo is10140VBZbe say10141VVsay ,10142,, look10143VVlook ,10144,, we10145PPwe have10146VHPhave a10147DTa no-aid10148NNno-aid clause10149NNclause which10150WDTwhich has10151VHZhave existed10152VVNexist for10153INfor a10154DTa very10155RBvery long10156JJlong time10157NNtime and10158CCand that10159WDTthat says10160VVZsay on10161INon its10162PP$its face10163NNface that10164IN/thatthat we10165PPwe prefer10166VVPprefer not10167RBnot to10168TOto fund10169VVfund religious10170JJreligious activities10171NNSactivity for10172INfor good10173JJgood reasons10174NNSreason I10175PPI 'd10176MDwould like10177VVlike to10178TOto explain10179VVexplain in10180INin just10181RBjust a10182DTa second10183JJsecond ,10184,, okay10185JJokay ?10186SENT? Now10187RBnow ,10188,, we10189PPwe 're10190VBPbe constrained10191VVNconstrain by10192INby anti-discrimination10193JJanti-discrimination principles10194NNSprinciple from10195INfrom coercing10196VVGcoerce people10197NNSpeople into10198INinto abandoning10199VVGabandon their10200PP$their religion10201NNreligion .10202SENT. So10203RBso if10204INif we10205PPwe have10206VHPhave these10207DTthese two10208CDtwo principles10209NNSprinciple ,10210,, these10211DTthese principled10212JJprincipled non-bigoted10213JJnon-bigoted and10214CCand historically10215RBhistorically rooted10216VVNroot views10217NNSview that10218IN/thatthat we10219PPwe do10220VVPdo n't10221RBn't want10222VVwant to10223TOto fund10224VVfund religious10225JJreligious activity10226NNactivity on10227INon the10228DTthe one10229CDone hand10230NNhand ,10231,, and10232CCand the10233DTthe First10234NPFirst Amendment10235NPAmendment ,10236,, which10237WDTwhich clearly10238RBclearly guards10239VVZguard against10240INagainst coercion10241NNcoercion and10242CCand penalizing10243VVGpenalize religious10244JJreligious faith10245NNfaith on10246INon the10247DTthe other10248JJother ,10249,, the10250DTthe way10251NNway we10252PPwe 're10253VBPbe going10254VVGgo to10255TOto balance10256VVbalance it10257PPit is10258VBZbe to10259TOto do10260VVdo what10261WPwhat the10262DTthe state10263NNstate court10264NNcourt did10265VVDdo .10266SENT. And10267CCand I10268PPI just10269RBjust want10270VVPwant to10271TOto say10272VVsay one10273CDone thing10274NNthing about10275INabout that10276DTthat .10277SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]10278LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] To10279TOTo do10280VVdo what10281WPwhat the10282DTthe state10283NNstate court10284NNcourt did10285VVDdo ,10286,, meaning10287VVGmean ?10288SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]10289LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yes10290NPYes ,10291,, invalidate10292VVPinvalidate the10293DTthe program10294NNprogram .10295SENT. And10296CCand I10297PPI just10298RBjust ...10299:... I10300PPI mean10301VVPmean ,10302,, if10303INif you10304PPyou look10305VVPlook at10306INat the10307DTthe reasons10308NNSreason the10309DTthe no-aid10310NNno-aid clause10311NNclause was10312VBDbe enacted10313VVNenact which10314WDTwhich I10315PPI think10316VVPthink are10317VBPbe similar10318JJsimilar to10319TOto the10320DTthe reasons10321NNSreason James10322NPJames Madison10323NPMadison gave10324VVDgive ,10325,, it10326PPit 's10327VBZbe just10328RBjust hard10329JJhard to10330TOto say10331VVsay that10332IN/thatthat James10333NPJames Madison10334NPMadison disabled10335VVDdisable future10336JJfuture states10337NNSstate from10338INfrom enacting10339VVGenact no-aid10340NNno-aid clauses10341NNSclause based10342VVNbase on10343INon essentially10344RBessentially similar10345JJsimilar arguments10346NNSargument to10347TOto the10348DTthe ones10349NNSone he10350PPhe made10351VVDmake .10352SENT. And10353CCand in10354INin 197210355CD@card@ ,10356,, what10357WPwhat the10358DTthe delegates10359NNSdelegate basically10360RBbasically said10361VVDsay was10362VBDbe that10363IN/thatthat they10364PPthey conceived10365VVDconceive of10366INof the10367DTthe no-aid10368NNno-aid clause10369NNclause as10370INas a10371DTa mechanism10372NNmechanism of10373INof protecting10374VVGprotect religious10375JJreligious schools10376NNSschool from10377INfrom political10378JJpolitical influence10379NNinfluence .10380SENT. So10381RBso ,10382,, to10383TOto prevent10384VVprevent government10385NNgovernment from10386INfrom using10387VVGuse its10388PP$its leverage10389NNleverage to10390TOto ...10391:... to10392TOto influence10393VVinfluence the10394DTthe content10395NNcontent of10396INof religious10397JJreligious education10398NNeducation .10399SENT. There10400EXthere 's10401VBZbe like10402INlike a10403DTa lot10404NNlot of10405INof leaders10406NNSleader of10407INof religious10408JJreligious denominations10409NNSdenomination who10410WPwho came10411VVDcome forward10412RBforward and10413CCand testified10414VVDtestify in10415INin favor10416NNfavor of10417INof the10418DTthe no-aid10419NNno-aid clause10420NNclause for10421INfor that10422DTthat exact10423JJexact reason10424NNreason .10425SENT. And10426CCand I10427PPI think10428VVPthink it10429PPit 's10430VBZbe very10431RBvery clear10432JJclear why10433WRBwhy that10434DTthat justification10435NNjustification applies10436VVZapply with10437INwith complete10438JJcomplete force10439NNforce with10440INwith respect10441NNrespect to10442TOto this10443DTthis program10444NNprogram ,10445,, right10446RBright ?10447SENT? Because10448INbecause it10449PPit 's10450VBZbe ...10451:... [JUSTICE ALITO]10452LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Basically10453RBbasically what10454WPwhat you10455PPyou 're10456VBPbe saying10457VVGsay is10458VBZbe ,10459,, the10460DTthe difference10461NNdifference between10462INbetween this10463DTthis and10464CCand race10465NNrace is10466VBZbe ,10467,, it10468PPit 's10469VBZbe permissible10470JJpermissible to10471TOto discriminate10472VVdiscriminate on10473INon the10474DTthe basis10475NNbasis of10476INof religion10477NNreligion .10478SENT. It10479PPit 's10480VBZbe not10481RBnot permissible10482JJpermissible ,10483,, ever10484RBever ,10485,, to10486TOto discriminate10487VVdiscriminate on10488INon the10489DTthe basis10490NNbasis of10491INof ...10492:... of10493INof race10494NNrace .10495SENT. That10496DTthat 's10497VBZbe what10498WPwhat you10499PPyou 're10500VBPbe saying10501VVGsay .10502SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]10503LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I10504PPI mean10505VVPmean ,10506,, look10507VVPlook ,10508,, it10509PPit ...10510:... it10511PPit seems10512VVZseem to10513TOto me10514PPme that10515IN/thatthat when10516WRBwhen you10517PPyou talk10518VVPtalk about10519INabout discrimination10520NNdiscrimination ,10521,, we10522PPwe can10523MDcan mean10524VVmean two10525CDtwo different10526JJdifferent things10527NNSthing ,10528,, all10529DTall right10530NNright ?10531SENT? One10532CDOne way10533NNway of10534INof looking10535VVGlook at10536INat discrimination10537NNdiscrimination is10538VBZbe to10539TOto say10540VVsay that10541IN/thatthat just10542RBjust ...10543:... you10544PPyou can10545MDcan 't10546RB't have10547VHhave a10548DTa rule10549NNrule that10550WDTthat treats10551VVZtreat religion10552NNreligion differently10553RBdifferently from10554INfrom other10555JJother subjects10556NNSsubject ,10557,, which10558WDTwhich is10559VBZbe I10560PPI think10561VVPthink is10562VBZbe the10563DTthe core10564NNcore of10565INof Petitioners10566NNSpetitioner '10567POS' argument10568NNargument .10569SENT. And10570CCand they10571PPthey say10572VVPsay ,10573,, look10574VVPlook at10575INat the10576DTthe no-aid10577NNno-aid clause10578NNclause .10579SENT. It10580PPit says10581VVZsay religious10582JJreligious schools10583NNSschool are10584VBPbe ineligible10585JJineligible and10586CCand it10587PPit imposes10588VVZimpose no10589DTno comparable10590JJcomparable restriction10591NNrestriction on10592INon anyone10593NNanyone else10594RBelse ,10595,, and10596CCand therefore10597RBtherefore that10598WDTthat 's10599VBZbe just10600RBjust discrimination10601NNdiscrimination and10602CCand it10603PPit should10604MDshould be10605VBbe wiped10606VVNwipe out10607RPout of10608INof the10609DTthe state10610NNstate constitution10611NNconstitution .10612SENT. So10613RBso if10614INif ...10615:... if10616INif ...10617:... if10618INif you10619PPyou buy10620VVPbuy that10621DTthat argument10622NNargument ,10623,, then10624RBthen you10625PPyou 're10626VBPbe basically10627RBbasically saying10628VVGsay that10629IN/thatthat like10630INlike every10631DTevery no-aid10632NNno-aid clause10633NNclause since10634INsince 183510635CD@card@ is10636VBZbe unconstitutional10637JJunconstitutional ,10638,, even10639RBeven at10640INat the10641DTthe founding10642NNfounding .10643SENT. Look10644NNlook ,10645,, all10646PDTall the10647DTthe state10648NNstate constitutions10649NNSconstitution said10650VVDsay things10651NNSthing like10652INlike ,10653,, a10654DTa tax10655NNtax won10656MDwill 't10657RB't be10658VBbe levied10659VVNlevy to10660TOto build10661VVbuild a10662DTa church10663NNchurch .10664SENT. That10665DTthat is10666VBZbe a10667DTa form10668NNform of10669INof discrimination10670NNdiscrimination ,10671,, right10672RBright ?10673SENT? Like10674INlike you10675PPyou can10676MDcan levy10677VVlevy a10678DTa tax10679NNtax to10680TOto build10681VVbuild a10682DTa bridge10683NNbridge but10684CCbut not10685RBnot a10686DTa church10687NNchurch .10688SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]10689LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well10690UHWell ,10691,, I10692PPI ...10693:... I10694PPI mean10695VVPmean ,10696,, I10697PPI do10698VVPdo n't10699RBn't know10700VVknow about10701INabout every10702DTevery ...10703:... every10704DTevery no-aid10705NNno-aid clause10706NNclause in10707INin the10708DTthe country10709NNcountry .10710SENT. They10711PPthey 'd10712MDwould all10713RBall have10714VHhave to10715TOto be10716VBbe examined10717VVNexamine separately10718RBseparately if10719INif in10720INin ...10721:... if10722INif ,10723,, in10724INin fact10725NNfact ,10726,, they10727PPthey are10728VBPbe challenged10729VVNchallenge .10730SENT. A10731DTa lot10732NNlot of10733INof them10734PPthem ...10735:... look10736VVlook ,10737,, you10738PPyou ...10739:... I10740PPI 'm10741VBPbe not10742RBnot going10743VVGgo to10744TOto get10745VVget into10746INinto an10747DTan argument10748NNargument with10749INwith you10750PPyou about10751INabout what10752WPwhat happened10753VVDhappen in10754INin 197210755CD@card@ ,10756,, but10757CCbut do10758VVPdo you10759PPyou really10760RBreally want10761VVPwant to10762TOto argue10763VVargue that10764IN/thatthat the10765DTthe reason10766NNreason why10767WRBwhy a10768DTa lot10769NNlot of10770INof this10771DTthis popped10772VVNpop up10773RPup beginning10774NNbeginning ,10775,, coincidentally10776RBcoincidentally ,10777,, in10778INin the10779DTthe 1840s10780JJ1840s ,10781,, at10782INat the10783DTthe time10784NNtime of10785INof the10786DTthe Irish10787JJIrish potato10788NNpotato famine10789NNfamine ,10790,, that10791WDTthat had10792VHDhave nothing10793NNnothing to10794TOto do10795VVdo with10796INwith discrimination10797NNdiscrimination based10798VVNbase on10799INon religion10800NNreligion ?10801SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]10802LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I10803PPI 'm10804VBPbe not10805RBnot saying10806VVGsay that10807IN/thatthat they10808PPthey ...10809:... no10810UHno ,10811,, I10812PPI 'm10813VBPbe not10814RBnot saying10815VVGsay that10816IN/thatthat at10817INat all10818DTall .10819SENT. I10820PPI think10821VVPthink that10822IN/thatthat the10823DTthe history10824NNhistory in10825INin the10826DTthe 19th10827JJ19th century10828NNcentury is10829VBZbe very10830RBvery complex10831JJcomplex ,10832,, like10833INlike there10834EXthere 's10835VBZbe a10836DTa Professor10837NPProfessor Green10838NPGreen ,10839,, who10840WPwho is10841VBZbe a10842DTa leading10843VVGlead scholar10844NNscholar on10845INon this10846DTthis ,10847,, wrote10848VVDwrite a10849DTa book10850NNbook that10851IN/thatthat both10852DTboth parties10853NNSparty cite10854VVcite which10855WDTwhich basically10856RBbasically says10857VVZsay it10858PPit 's10859VBZbe a10860DTa complex10861JJcomplex history10862NNhistory and10863CCand there10864EXthere 's10865VBZbe good10866JJgood reasons10867VVZreason and10868CCand there10869EXthere 's10870VBZbe bad10871JJbad reasons10872NNSreason and10873CCand it10874PPit depends10875VVZdepend on10876INon the10877DTthe state10878NNstate .10879SENT. And10880CCand ,10881,, look10882VVPlook ,10883,, I10884PPI ...10885:... I10886PPI do10887VVPdo n't10888RBn't see10889VVsee how10890WRBhow Montana10891NPMontana could10892MDcould ...10893:... [JUSTICE BREYER]10894LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But10895CCbut are10896VBPbe n't10897RBn't you10898PPyou saying10899VVGsay ...10900:... are10901VBPbe you10902PPyou ...10903:... I10904PPI do10905VVPdo n't10906RBn't know10907VVknow ,10908,, can10909MDcan we10910PPwe ...10911:... can10912MDcan you10913PPyou or10914CCor could10915MDcould I10916PPI say10917VVsay this10918DTthis :10919:: Yes10920UHyes ,10921,, race10922NNrace is10923VBZbe different10924JJdifferent from10925INfrom religion10926NNreligion .10927SENT. Why10928WRBwhy ?10929SENT? There10930EXthere is10931VBZbe no10932DTno Establishment10933NNestablishment Clause10934NNclause in10935INin regard10936NNregard to10937TOto race10938NNrace .10939SENT. What10940WPWhat is10941VBZbe the10942DTthe Establishment10943NNestablishment Clause10944NNclause ?10945SENT? Well10946UHwell ,10947,, it10948PPit has10949VHZhave something10950NNsomething to10951TOto do10952VVdo with10953INwith not10954RBnot supporting10955VVGsupport religion10956NNreligion .10957SENT. And10958CCand there10959EXthere is10960VBZbe nothing10961RBnothing more10962RBRmore religious10963JJreligious except10964INexcept perhaps10965RBperhaps for10966INfor the10967DTthe service10968NNservice in10969INin the10970DTthe church10971NNchurch itself10972PPitself than10973INthan religious10974JJreligious education10975NNeducation .10976SENT. That10977DTthat 's10978VBZbe how10979WRBhow we10980PPwe create10981VVPcreate a10982DTa future10983NNfuture for10984INfor our10985PP$our religion10986NNreligion .10987SENT. Now10988RBnow ,10989,, there10990EXthere 's10991VBZbe some10992DTsome line10993NNline there10994RBthere ,10995,, and10996CCand that10997IN/thatthat line10998NNline may10999MDmay be11000VBbe what11001WPwhat I11002PPI have11003VHPhave just11004RBjust suggested11005VVNsuggest ,11006,, impermissible11007JJimpermissible under11008INunder case11009NNcase law11010NNlaw of11011INof this11012DTthis Court11013NPCourt or11014CCor it11015PPit may11016MDmay be11017VBbe permissible11018JJpermissible but11019CCbut unwise11020JJunwise .11021SENT. You11022PPyou 'd11023MDwould like11024VVlike to11025TOto draw11026VVdraw the11027DTthe line11028NNline .11029SENT. Explain11030VVexplain it11031PPit .11032SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]11033LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Okay11034NPOkay .11035SENT. So11036RBso I11037PPI think11038VVPthink that11039IN/thatthat ,11040,, you11041PPyou know11042VVPknow ,11043,, we11044PPwe have11045VHPhave n't11046RBn't talked11047VVNtalk about11048INabout the11049DTthe analogies11050NNSanalogy to11051TOto Locke11052NPLocke at11053INat all11054DTall .11055SENT. I11056PPI 'd11057MDwould just11058RBjust like11059VVlike to11060TOto say11061VVsay a11062DTa few11063JJfew words11064NNSword about11065RBabout that11066IN/thatthat ,11067,, with11068INwith I11069PPI ...11070:... which11071WDTwhich I11072PPI think11073VVPthink are11074VBPbe consistent11075JJconsistent to11076TOto your11077PP$your question11078NNquestion .11079SENT. So11080RBso it11081PPit 's11082VBZbe true11083JJtrue that11084IN/thatthat there11085EXthere are11086VBPbe factual11087JJfactual distinctions11088NNSdistinction between11089INbetween this11090DTthis case11091NNcase and11092CCand Locke11093NPLocke ,11094,, right11095RBright ?11096SENT? Locke11097NPLocke involved11098VVDinvolve training11099NNtraining for11100INfor the11101DTthe ministry11102NNministry and11103CCand this11104DTthis case11105NNcase involves11106VVZinvolve secondary11107JJsecondary education11108NNeducation .11109SENT. So11110RBso I'm11111NPI'm ...11112:... I11113PPI 'm11114VBPbe not11115RBnot denying11116VVGdeny ...11117:... I11118PPI 'm11119VBPbe not11120RBnot saying11121VVGsay they11122PPthey 're11123VBPbe on11124INon all11125DTall fours11126NNSfour with11127INwith each11128DTeach other11129JJother ,11130,, but11131CCbut the11132DTthe question11133NNquestion is11134VBZbe whether11135INwhether that11136DTthat distinction11137NNdistinction can11138MDcan be11139VBbe located11140VVNlocate in11141INin the11142DTthe free-exercise11143NNfree-exercise clause11144NNclause .11145SENT. Because11146RBbecause ,11147,, really11148RBreally ,11149,, you11150PPyou know11151VVPknow ,11152,, it11153PPit 's11154VBZbe true11155JJtrue that11156IN/thatthat Locke11157NPLocke involved11158VVDinvolve funding11159NNfunding of11160INof the11161DTthe ministry11162NNministry but11163CCbut I11164PPI think11165VVPthink this11166DTthis case11167NNcase does11168VVZdo too11169RBtoo ,11170,, right11171RBright ,11172,, the11173DTthe ministry11174NNministry of11175INof teachers11176NNSteacher towards11177INtowards their11178PP$their students11179NNSstudent .11180SENT. And11181CCand I11182PPI think11183VVPthink Petitioners11184NNSpetitioner have11185VHPhave a11186DTa somewhat11187RBsomewhat revealing11188JJrevealing statement11189NNstatement ...11190:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11191LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But11192CCbut this11193DTthis is11194VBZbe a11195DTa ...11196:... this11197DTthis is11198VBZbe a11199DTa school11200NNschool ,11201,, in11202INin education11203NNeducation ,11204,, there11205EXthere satisfies11206VVZsatisfy the11207DTthe compulsory11208JJcompulsory education11209NNeducation laws11210NNSlaw of11211INof the11212DTthe state11213NNstate ,11214,, correct11215JJcorrect ?11216SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]11217LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] That11218DTthat 's11219VBZbe true11220JJtrue .11221SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11222LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And11223CCand so11224RBso that11225WDTthat 's11226VBZbe different11227JJdifferent from11228INfrom Locke11229NPLocke ,11230,, as11231INas Professor11232NPProfessor Laycock11233NPLaycock 's11234POS's amicus11235NNamicus brief11236NNbrief points11237VVZpoint out11238RPout in11239INin a11240DTa very11241RBvery narrow11242JJnarrow decision11243NNdecision about11244INabout training11245NNtraining of11246INof the11247DTthe clergy11248NNclergy .11249SENT. And11250CCand it11251PPit seems11252VVZseem to11253TOto me11254PPme there11255EXthere are11256VBPbe two11257CDtwo different11258JJdifferent things11259NNSthing going11260VVGgo on11261INon here11262RBhere ,11263,, it11264PPit seems11265VVZseem to11266TOto me11267PPme .11268SENT. One11269PPone is11270VBZbe to11271TOto Justice11272NPJustice Breyer11273NPBreyer 's11274POS's question11275NNquestion ,11276,, just11277RBjust funding11278VVGfund religion11279NNreligion ,11280,, funding11281VVGfund religious11282JJreligious schools11283NNSschool generally11284RBgenerally or11285CCor training11286VVGtrain of11287INof clergy11288NNclergy is11289VBZbe ...11290:... is11291VBZbe an11292DTan establishment11293NNestablishment clause11294NNclause concern11295NNconcern ,11296,, but11297CCbut this11298DTthis ...11299:... it11300PPit 's11301VBZbe a11302DTa separate11303JJseparate issue11304NNissue when11305WRBwhen you11306PPyou set11307VVDset up11308RPup a11309DTa neutral11310JJneutral benefit11311NNbenefit program11312NNprogram ...11313:... police11314NNSpolice ,11315,, fire11316NNfire ,11317,, or11318CCor scholarships11319NNSscholarship ...11320:... and11321CCand allow11322VVallow people11323NNSpeople to11324TOto use11325VVuse those11326DTthose things11327NNSthing ,11328,, allow11329VVallow religious11330JJreligious institutions11331NNSinstitution to11332TOto obtain11333VVobtain the11334DTthe benefits11335NNSbenefit of11336INof those11337DTthose things11338NNSthing on11339INon a11340DTa non-discriminatory11341JJnon-discriminatory basis11342NNbasis .11343SENT. And11344CCand the11345DTthe question11346NNquestion in11347INin this11348DTthis case11349NNcase ,11350,, it11351PPit seems11352VVZseem to11353TOto me11354PPme ,11355,, is11356VBZbe which11357WDTwhich side11358NNside of11359INof that11360WDTthat line11361NNline this11362DTthis comes11363VVZcome on11364INon .11365SENT. Is11366VBZbe that11367IN/thatthat the11368DTthe ...11369:... a11370DTa proper11371JJproper way11372NNway to11373TOto look11374VVlook at11375INat it11376PPit ?11377SENT? And11378CCand if11379INif so11380RBso ,11381,, why11382WRBwhy does11383VVZdo it11384PPit come11385VVcome on11386INon the11387DTthe funding11388NNfunding side11389NNside ?11390SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]11391LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I11392PPI ...11393:... I11394PPI guess11395VVPguess I11396PPI 'm11397VBPbe not11398RBnot really11399RBreally sure11400JJsure that11401WDTthat 's11402VBZbe the11403DTthe right11404JJright way11405NNway to11406TOto look11407VVlook at11408INat it11409PPit .11410SENT. I11411PPI think11412VVPthink that11413IN/thatthat it11414PPit 's11415VBZbe important11416JJimportant to11417TOto just11418RBjust look11419VVlook at11420INat the11421DTthe interest11422NNinterest the11423DTthe no-aid11424NNno-aid clause11425NNclause protects11426VVZprotect ,11427,, understand11428VVPunderstand whether11429INwhether those11430DTthose are11431VBPbe just11432RBjust unconstitutional11433JJunconstitutional and11434CCand whether11435INwhether they11436PPthey apply11437VVPapply to11438TOto this11439DTthis case11440NNcase .11441SENT. So11442RBso as11443INas I11444PPI said11445VVDsay ,11446,, the11447DTthe no-aid11448NNno-aid clause11449NNclause was11450VBDbe concerned11451VVNconcern about11452INabout using11453VVGuse government11454NNgovernment leverage11455NNleverage to11456TOto influence11457VVinfluence religious11458JJreligious education11459NNeducation .11460SENT. And11461CCand it11462PPit 's11463VBZbe very11464RBvery easy11465JJeasy how11466WRBhow ...11467:... to11468TOto see11469VVsee how11470WRBhow that11471DTthat can11472MDcan happen11473VVhappen in11474INin the11475DTthe context11476NNcontext of11477INof even11478RBeven a11479DTa neutral11480JJneutral program11481NNprogram like11482INlike this11483DTthis one11484CDone .11485SENT. The11486DTthe state11487NNstate can11488MDcan just11489RBjust have11490VHhave a11491DTa condition11492NNcondition ...11493:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11494LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] You11495PPyou think11496VVPthink that11497WDTthat was11498VBDbe the11499DTthe design11500NNdesign of11501INof the11502DTthe no-aid11503NNno-aid clause11504NNclause ,11505,, to11506TOto ...11507:... to11508TOto help11509VVhelp religious11510JJreligious institutions11511NNSinstitution ?11512SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]11513LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yeah11514NPYeah .11515SENT. If11516INif you11517PPyou look11518VVPlook at11519INat the11520DTthe transcripts11521NNStranscript of11522INof 197211523CD@card@ ,11524,, that11525WDTthat 's11526VBZbe ...11527:... is11528VBZbe ...11529:... what11530WPwhat it11531PPit 's11532VBZbe all11533RBall about11534RBabout .11535SENT. There11536RBthere ...11537:... there11538EXthere is11539VBZbe numerous11540JJnumerous religious11541JJreligious leaders11542NNSleader who11543WPwho came11544VVDcome forward11545RBforward and11546CCand testified11547VVDtestify that11548IN/thatthat that11549DTthat 's11550VBZbe the11551DTthe reason11552NNreason they11553PPthey wanted11554VVDwant it11555PPit .11556SENT. On11557INon the11558DTthe floor11559NNfloor of11560INof the11561DTthe convention11562NNconvention in11563INin 197211564CD@card@ ,11565,, the11566DTthe strongest11567JJSstrong proponent11568NNproponent was11569VBDbe Delegate11570NNdelegate Harper11571NPHarper who11572WPwho was11573VBDbe not11574RBnot an11575DTan anti-religious11576JJanti-religious bigot11577NNbigot .11578SENT. He11579PPhe was11580VBDbe the11581DTthe pastor11582NNpastor of11583INof a11584DTa church11585NNchurch in11586INin Helena11587NPHelena and11588CCand he11589PPhe told11590VVDtell his11591PP$his colleagues11592NNScolleague ,11593,, drawing11594VVGdraw on11595INon his11596PP$his own11597JJown religious11598JJreligious faith11599NNfaith ,11600,, that11601IN/thatthat the11602DTthe no-aid11603NNno-aid clause11604NNclause was11605VBDbe necessary11606JJnecessary to11607TOto ensure11608VVensure that11609IN/thatthat religious11610JJreligious schools11611NNSschool were11612VBDbe independent11613JJindependent from11614INfrom government11615NNgovernment .11616SENT. So11617RBso I11618PPI just11619RBjust do11620VVPdo n't11621RBn't ...11622:... and11623CCand there11624EXthere 's11625VBZbe a11626DTa committee11627NNcommittee report11628NNreport ...11629:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11630LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well11631UHWell ,11632,, no11633DTno one11634CDone 's11635VBZbe compelling11636VVGcompel the11637DTthe religious11638JJreligious schools11639NNSschool to11640TOto participate11641VVparticipate in11642INin a11643DTa program11644NNprogram in11645INin order11646NNorder to11647TOto accept11648VVaccept funds11649NNSfund from11650INfrom the11651DTthe program11652NNprogram ,11653,, correct11654JJcorrect ?11655SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]11656LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] That11657DTthat is11658VBZbe certainly11659RBcertainly true11660JJtrue .11661SENT. But11662CCbut ...11663:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11664LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] So11665INso a11666DTa religious11667JJreligious school11668NNschool that11669WDTthat does11670VVZdo n't11671RBn't want11672VVwant to11673TOto be11674VBbe part11675NNpart of11676INof a11677DTa neutral11678JJneutral program11679NNprogram does11680VVZdo n't11681RBn't have11682VHhave to11683TOto be11684VBbe .11685SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]11686LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] Yeah11687NPYeah ,11688,, that11689WDTthat 's11690VBZbe true11691JJtrue .11692SENT. But11693CCbut I11694PPI mean11695VVPmean ,11696,, there11697EXthere 's11698VBZbe still11699RBstill a11700DTa concern11701NNconcern that11702IN/thatthat ultimately11703RBultimately the11704DTthe inevitable11705JJinevitable effect11706NNeffect of11707INof these11708DTthese programs11709NNSprogram is11710VBZbe that11711IN/thatthat the11712DTthe government11713NNgovernment would11714MDwould exercise11715VVexercise its11716PP$its leverage11717NNleverage over11718INover schools11719NNSschool .11720SENT. And11721CCand ,11722,, look11723VVPlook ,11724,, this11725DTthis is11726VBZbe what11727WPwhat people11728NNSpeople were11729VBDbe saying11730VVGsay at11731INat the11732DTthe hearing11733NNhearing ,11734,, and11735CCand I11736PPI think11737VVPthink that11738IN/thatthat may11739MDmay be11740VBbe a11741DTa little11742RBlittle paternalistic11743JJpaternalistic ,11744,, but11745CCbut I11746PPI think11747VVPthink the11748DTthe state11749NNstate is11750VBZbe allowed11751VVNallow to11752TOto have11753VHhave a11754DTa structural11755JJstructural provision11756NNprovision being11757VBGbe arguably11758RBarguably paternalistic11759JJpaternalistic in11760INin its11761PP$its own11762JJown state11763NNstate constitution11764NNconstitution .11765SENT. There11766EXthere 's11767VBZbe no11768DTno bigotry11769NNbigotry whatsoever11770RBwhatsoever in11771INin evidence11772NNevidence from11773INfrom the11774DTthe actual11775JJactual convention11776NNconvention at11777INat which11778WDTwhich this11779DTthis is11780VBZbe enacted11781VVNenact .11782SENT. I11783PPI just11784RBjust do11785VVPdo n't11786RBn't understand11787VVunderstand how11788WRBhow Montana11789NPMontana could11790MDcould have11791VHhave done11792VVNdo any11793DTany better11794JJRgood than11795INthan it11796PPit did11797VVDdo ,11798,, to11799TOto wipe11800VVwipe out11801RPout its11802PP$its entire11803JJentire state11804NNstate constitution11805NNconstitution ,11806,, start11807VVstart all11808RBall over11809INover again11810RBagain ,11811,, have11812VHPhave committee11813NNcommittee hearings11814NNShearing ...11815:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11816LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I11817PPI think11818VVPthink the11819DTthe other11820JJother side11821NNside 's11822POS's argument11823NNargument is11824VBZbe the11825DTthe way11826NNway you11827PPyou can11828MDcan do11829VVdo better11830JJRgood is11831VBZbe to11832TOto say11833VVsay :11834:: If11835INif we11836PPwe 're11837VBPbe going11838VVGgo to11839TOto give11840VVgive benefits11841NNSbenefit to11842TOto private11843JJprivate schools11844NNSschool ,11845,, which11846WDTwhich you11847PPyou do11848VVPdo n't11849RBn't have11850VHhave to11851TOto do11852VVdo ...11853:... to11854TOto Justice11855NPJustice Breyer11856NPBreyer 's11857POS's question11858NNquestion ,11859,, you11860PPyou do11861VVPdo not11862RBnot have11863VHhave to11864TOto give11865VVgive benefits11866NNSbenefit to11867TOto private11868JJprivate schools11869NNSschool or11870CCor funds11871NNSfund or11872CCor tax11873NNtax credits11874NNScredit ,11875,, but11876CCbut if11877INif you11878PPyou do11879VVPdo ,11880,, do11881VVPdo n't11882RBn't tell11883VVtell someone11884NNsomeone they11885PPthey can11886MDcan 't11887RB't participate11888VVparticipate because11889INbecause they11890PPthey 're11891VBPbe Jewish11892JJJewish or11893CCor Protestant11894JJProtestant or11895CCor Catholic11896JJCatholic .11897SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]11898LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] I11899PPI guess11900VVPguess the11901DTthe ...11902:... the11903DTthe concern11904NNconcern of11905INof the11906DTthe delegates11907NNSdelegate was11908VBDbe that11909IN/thatthat if11910INif you11911PPyou have11912VHPhave money11913NNmoney going11914VVGgo to11915TOto religious11916JJreligious schools11917NNSschool ,11918,, that11919WDTthat 's11920VBZbe going11921VVGgo to11922TOto lead11923VVlead to11924TOto entanglement11925NNentanglement problems11926NNSproblem .11927SENT. And11928CCand the11929DTthe way11930NNway to11931TOto solve11932VVsolve that11933DTthat problem11934NNproblem is11935VBZbe to11936TOto have11937VHhave a11938DTa structural11939JJstructural provision11940NNprovision saying11941VVGsay ,11942,, we11943PPwe 're11944VBPbe not11945RBnot going11946VVGgo to11947TOto do11948VVdo it11949PPit .11950SENT. And11951CCand that11952DTthat 's11953VBZbe not11954RBnot prohibiting11955VVGprohibit anyone11956NNanyone from11957INfrom exercising11958VVGexercise their11959PP$their religion11960NNreligion .11961SENT. It11962PPit 's11963VBZbe simply11964RBsimply separating11965VVGseparate the11966DTthe church11967NNchurch from11968INfrom the11969DTthe state11970NNstate without11971INwithout ,11972,, again11973RBagain ,11974,, preventing11975VVGprevent anyone11976NNanyone from11977INfrom going11978VVGgo to11979TOto any11980DTany of11981INof these11982DTthese schools11983NNSschool if11984INif they11985PPthey do11986VVPdo n't11987RBn't want11988VVwant to11989TOto .11990SENT. And11991CCand it11992PPit 's11993VBZbe true11994JJtrue that11995IN/thatthat there11996EXthere 's11997VBZbe a11998DTa constraint11999NNconstraint in12000INin the12001DTthe Federal12002NPFederal Constitution12003NPConstitution that12004WDTthat says12005VVZsay that12006IN/thatthat you12007PPyou can12008MDcan 't12009RB't coerce12010VVcoerce people12011NNSpeople ,12012,, you12013PPyou can12014MDcan 't12015RB't tell12016VVtell people12017NNSpeople we12018PPwe 're12019VBPbe going12020VVGgo to12021TOto penalize12022VVpenalize you12023PPyou for12024INfor being12025VBGbe religious12026JJreligious .12027SENT. But12028CCbut if12029INif a12030DTa state12031NNstate has12032VHZhave two12033CDtwo principles12034NNSprinciple it12035PPit wants12036VVZwant to12037TOto stick12038VVstick to12039TOto at12040INat the12041DTthe same12042JJsame time12043NNtime then12044RBthen we12045PPwe think12046VVPthink that12047IN/thatthat it12048PPit should12049MDshould be12050VBbe able12051JJable to12052TOto balance12053VVbalance those12054DTthose principles12055NNSprinciple by12056INby invalidating12057VVGinvalidate the12058DTthe program12059NNprogram .12060SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]12061LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Mr12062NPMr .12063SENT. Unikowsky12064NPUnikowsky ,12065,, if12066INif we12067PPwe can12068MDcan just12069RBjust go12070VVgo back12071RBback to12072TOto the12073DTthe standing12074NNstanding question12075NNquestion .12076SENT. You12077PPyou are12078VBPbe not12079RBnot at12080INat liberty12081NNliberty to12082TOto waive12083VVwaive Article12084NPArticle III12085NPIII ,12086,, so12087RBso why12088WRBwhy do12089VVPdo you12090PPyou think12091VVPthink this12092DTthis case12093NNcase does12094VVZdo n't12095RBn't fit12096VVfit under12097INunder Eastern12098NPEastern Kentucky12099NPKentucky ?12100SENT? [MR. UNIKOWSKY]12101LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So12102INso I'll12103NPI'll ...12104:... I12105PPI 'll12106MDwill just12107RBjust answer12108VVanswer briefly12109RBbriefly ,12110,, Your12111PP$your Honor12112NPHonor .12113SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12114LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Sure12115NPSure .12116SENT. [MR. UNIKOWSKY]12117LOC[MR. UNIKOWSKY] So12118INso Petitioners12119NNSpetitioner are12120VBPbe claiming12121VVGclaim they12122PPthey personally12123RBpersonally are12124VBPbe the12125DTthe victims12126NNSvictim of12127INof status12128NNstatus discrimination12129NNdiscrimination ,12130,, which12131WDTwhich is12132VBZbe the12133DTthe argument12134NNargument that12135WDTthat was12136VBDbe n't12137RBn't made12138VVNmake in12139INin that12140DTthat case12141NNcase .12142SENT. So12143RBso we12144PPwe think12145VVPthink that12146IN/thatthat they12147PPthey 're12148VBPbe allowed12149VVNallow to12150TOto make12151VVmake that12152DTthat argument12153NNargument ,12154,, it12155PPit is12156VBZbe just12157RBjust incorrect12158JJincorrect on12159INon its12160PP$its merits12161NNSmerit .12162SENT. But12163CCbut ,12164,, of12165INof course12166NNcourse ,12167,, this12168DTthis argument12169NNargument is12170VBZbe made12171VVNmake in12172INin amicus12173NNamicus brief12174NNbrief .12175SENT. And12176CCand ,12177,, as12178INas you12179PPyou say12180VVPsay ,12181,, we12182PPwe 're12183VBPbe not12184RBnot able12185JJable to12186TOto waive12187VVwaive it12188PPit .12189SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12190LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank12191VVthank you12192PPyou ,12193,, counsel12194NNcounsel .12195SENT. Mr12196NPMr .12197SENT. Komer12198NPKomer ,12199,, two12200CDtwo minutes12201NNSminute remaining12202VVGremain .12203SENT.

[MR. KOMER]12204LOC[MR. KOMER] Thank12205VVthank you12206PPyou .12207SENT. What12208WPWhat we12209PPwe 're12210VBPbe saying12211VVGsay here12212RBhere is12213VBZbe that12214DTthat ...12215:... what12216WPwhat Trinity12217NPTrinity Lutheran12218NPLutheran says12219VVZsay ,12220,, the12221DTthe state12222NNstate can12223MDcan 't12224RB't discriminate12225JJdiscriminate on12226INon the12227DTthe basis12228NNbasis of12229INof religion12230NNreligion .12231SENT. The12232DTthe decision12233NNdecision is12234VBZbe crystal12235JJcrystal clear12236VVclear when12237WRBwhen you12238PPyou read12239VVPread it12240PPit that12241IN/thatthat that12242DTthat is12243VBZbe what12244WPwhat they12245PPthey are12246VBPbe doing12247VVGdo in12248INin this12249DTthis case12250NNcase .12251SENT. They12252PPthey focus12253VVPfocus on12254INon the12255DTthe religious12256JJreligious affiliation12257NNaffiliation or12258CCor religious12259JJreligious nature12260NNnature of12261INof the12262DTthe schools12263NNSschool .12264SENT. They12265PPthey are12266VBPbe not12267RBnot talking12268VVGtalk about12269INabout what12270WPwhat the12271DTthe schools12272NNSschool do12273VVPdo .12274SENT. They12275PPthey are12276VBPbe talking12277VVGtalk about12278INabout what12279WPwhat the12280DTthe schools12281NNSschool are12282VBPbe .12283SENT. Second12284RBsecond ,12285,, Zelman12286NPZelman has12287VHZhave already12288RBalready answered12289VVNanswer the12290DTthe question12291NNquestion about12292INabout who12293WPwho this12294DTthis program12295NNprogram is12296VBZbe aiding12297VVGaid .12298SENT. It12299PPit 's12300VBZbe not12301RBnot aiding12302VVGaid the12303DTthe schools12304NNSschool .12305SENT. It12306PPit is12307VBZbe aiding12308VVGaid the12309DTthe parents12310NNSparent .12311SENT. You12312PPyou have12313VHPhave a12314DTa choice12315NNchoice to12316TOto make12317VVmake about12318INabout the12319DTthe parents12320NNSparent here12321RBhere .12322SENT. You12323PPyou can12324MDcan either12325RBeither view12326VVview them12327PPthem as12328INas mere12329JJmere inconsequential12330JJinconsequential conduits12331NNSconduit through12332INthrough which12333WDTwhich public12334JJpublic funds12335NNSfund flow12336NNflow to12337TOto the12338DTthe religious12339JJreligious schools12340NNSschool they12341PPthey choose12342VVPchoose or12343CCor you12344PPyou can12345MDcan regard12346VVregard them12347PPthem ,12348,, as12349INas you12350PPyou did12351VVDdo in12352INin Zelman12353NPZelman ,12354,, as12355INas free12356JJfree and12357CCand independent12358JJindependent decision-makers12359NNSdecision-maker who12360WPwho are12361VBPbe being12362VBGbe given12363VVNgive the12364DTthe power12365NNpower to12366TOto choose12367VVchoose a12368DTa religious12369JJreligious education12370NNeducation or12371CCor a12372DTa secular12373JJsecular education12374NNeducation in12375INin private12376JJprivate schools12377NNSschool .12378SENT. We12379PPwe are12380VBPbe not12381RBnot arguing12382VVGargue that12383IN/thatthat the12384DTthe state12385NNstate could12386MDcould n't12387RBn't just12388RBjust fund12389VVfund public12390JJpublic schools12391NNSschool .12392SENT. We12393PPwe are12394VBPbe saying12395VVGsay that12396IN/thatthat when12397WRBwhen the12398DTthe legislature12399NNlegislature ,12400,, when12401WRBwhen the12402DTthe state12403NNstate makes12404VVZmake the12405DTthe decision12406NNdecision to12407TOto empower12408VVempower parents12409NNSparent to12410TOto exercise12411VVexercise their12412PP$their right12413NNright to12414TOto choose12415VVchoose and12416CCand direct12417VVdirect their12418PP$their children12419NNSchild 's12420POS's education12421NNeducation ,12422,, that12423IN/thatthat the12424DTthe state12425NNstate cannot12426MDcan distinguish12427VVdistinguish between12428INbetween parents12429NNSparent who12430WPwho want12431VVPwant a12432DTa religious12433JJreligious education12434NNeducation for12435INfor their12436PP$their children12437NNSchild and12438CCand parents12439NNSparent who12440WPwho want12441VVPwant a12442DTa secular12443JJsecular private12444JJprivate education12445NNeducation for12446INfor their12447PP$their parents12448NNSparent .12449SENT. We12450PPwe are12451VBPbe only12452RBonly in12453INin that12454DTthat area12455NNarea because12456INbecause the12457DTthe state12458NNstate legislature12459NNlegislature has12460VHZhave made12461VVNmake ,12462,, like12463INlike Montana12464NPMontana did12465VVDdo ,12466,, the12467DTthe decision12468NNdecision to12469TOto open12470VVopen it12471PPit up12472RPup beyond12473INbeyond the12474DTthe public12475JJpublic schools12476NNSschool .12477SENT. We12478PPwe do12479VVPdo n't12480RBn't question12481VVquestion that12482IN/thatthat the12483DTthe public12484JJpublic schools12485NNSschool must12486MDmust be12487VBbe secular12488JJsecular .12489SENT. This12490DTthis Court12491NPCourt recognized12492VVDrecognize that12493IN/thatthat in12494INin Schempp12495NPSchempp .12496SENT. And12497CCand ,12498,, as12499INas a12500DTa result12501NNresult ,12502,, the12503DTthe public12504JJpublic schools12505NNSschool now12506RBnow must12507MDmust be12508VBbe secular12509JJsecular .12510SENT. But12511CCbut at12512INat the12513DTthe time12514NNtime these12515DTthese provisions12516NNSprovision were12517VBDbe passed12518VVNpass ,12519,, the12520DTthe public12521JJpublic schools12522NNSschool were12523VBDbe not12524RBnot secular12525JJsecular .12526SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12527LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] It12528PPit 's12529VBZbe almost12530RBalmost ...12531:... [MR. KOMER]12532LOC[MR. KOMER] That12533DTthat is12534VBZbe why12535WRBwhy ...12536:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12537LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] It12538PPit 's12539VBZbe almost12540RBalmost sort12541NNsort of12542INof a12543DTa illusory12544JJillusory state12545NNstate ,12546,, is12547VBZbe n't12548RBn't it12549PPit ?12550SENT? The12551DTthe legislatures12552NNSlegislature can12553MDcan choose12554VVchoose to12555TOto give12556VVgive money12557NNmoney or12558CCor not12559RBnot .12560SENT. If12561INif they12562PPthey choose12563VVPchoose ,12564,, they12565PPthey have12566VHPhave to12567TOto do12568VVdo it12569PPit this12570DTthis way12571NNway .12572SENT. But12573CCbut the12574DTthe court12575NNcourt system12576NNsystem is12577VBZbe out12578RPout of12579INof it12580PPit because12581INbecause it12582PPit can12583MDcan 't12584RB't force12585VVforce the12586DTthe legislatures12587NNSlegislature to12588TOto act12589VVact constitutionally12590RBconstitutionally under12591INunder their12592PP$their own12593JJown constitution12594NNconstitution .12595SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12596LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] You12597PPyou may12598MDmay ...12599:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12600LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That12601DTthat 's12602VBZbe basically12603RBbasically what12604WPwhat you12605PPyou 're12606VBPbe saying12607VVGsay ,12608,, is12609VBZbe n't12610RBn't it12611PPit ?12612SENT? [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12613LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] You12614PPyou may12615MDmay answer12616VVanswer briefly12617RBbriefly .12618SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12619LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] And12620CCand not12621RBnot fund12622NNfund .12623SENT. [MR. KOMER]12624LOC[MR. KOMER] We12625PPwe 're12626VBPbe saying12627VVGsay the12628DTthe legislature12629NNlegislature ab12630NPab initio12631NPInitio might12632MDmight be12633VBbe able12634JJable to12635TOto do12636VVdo more12637JJRmore than12638INthan what12639WPwhat the12640DTthe court12641NNcourt should12642MDshould have12643VHhave done12644VVNdo here12645RBhere .12646SENT. They12647PPthey should12648MDshould have12649VHhave answered12650VVNanswer the12651DTthe federal12652JJfederal question12653NNquestion .12654SENT. They12655PPthey should12656MDshould have12657VHhave recognized12658VVNrecognize that12659IN/thatthat Trinity12660NPTrinity Lutheran12661NPLutheran is12662VBZbe applicable12663JJapplicable .12664SENT. They12665PPthey should12666MDshould have12667VHhave recognized12668VVNrecognize they12669PPthey were12670VBDbe applying12671VVGapply Locke12672NPLocke exactly12673RBexactly the12674DTthe way12675NNway Missouri12676NPMissouri tried12677VVDtry to12678TOto .12679SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12680LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank12681VVthank you12682PPyou ,12683,, counsel12684NNcounsel .12685SENT. The12686DTthe case12687NNcase is12688VBZbe submitted12689VVNsubmit .12690SENT.