[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We2PPwe
'll3MDwill
hear4VVhear
argument5NNargument
today6NNtoday
in7INin
Case8NPCase
18-13349CD@card@
,10,,
the11DTthe
Financial12NPFinancial
Oversight13NPOversight
and14CCand
Management15NPManagement
Board16NPBoard
for17INfor
Puerto18NPPuerto
Rico19NPRico
versus20CCversus
Aurelius21NPAurelius
Investment22NPInvestment
,23,,
and24CCand
the25DTthe
consolidated26JJconsolidated
cases27NNScase
.28SENT.
Mr29NPMr
.30SENT.
Verrilli31NPVerrilli
.32SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]33LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Mr34NPMr
.35SENT.
Chief36NPChief
Justice37NPJustice
,38,,
and39CCand
may40MDmay
it41PPit
please42VVplease
the43DTthe
Court44NPCourt
:45::
The46DTthe
question47NNquestion
in48INin
this49DTthis
case50NNcase
is51VBZbe
whether52INwhether
members53NNSmember
of54INof
the55DTthe
Financial56NPFinancial
Oversight57NPOversight
Board58NPBoard
are59VBPbe
officers60NNSofficer
of61INof
the62DTthe
United63NPUnited
States64NPSStates
who65WPwho
must66MDmust
be67VBbe
selected68VVNselect
in69INin
the70DTthe
manner71NNmanner
that72IN/thatthat
the73DTthe
Appointments74NNSappointment
Clause75NNclause
prescribes76VVZprescribe
or77CCor
whether78INwhether
they79PPthey
are80VBPbe
instead81RBinstead
territorial82JJterritorial
officers83NNSofficer
who84WPwho
do85VVPdo
not86RBnot
have87VHhave
to88TOto
be89VBbe
selected90VVNselect
in91INin
that92DTthat
manner93NNmanner
.94SENT.
The95DTthe
Constitution96NPConstitution
's97POS's
text98NNtext
,99,,
structure100NNstructure
,101,,
and102CCand
history103NNhistory
,104,,
and105CCand
this106DTthis
Court107NPCourt
's108POS's
precedents109NNSprecedent
all110RBall
make111VVPmake
clear112JJclear
that113IN/thatthat
the114DTthe
proper115JJproper
focus116NNfocus
in117INin
answering118VVGanswer
that119DTthat
question120NNquestion
is121VBZbe
the122DTthe
nature123NNnature
of124INof
the125DTthe
authority126NNauthority
the127DTthe
Board128NPBoard
exercises129VVZexercise
.130SENT.
It131PPit
comes132VVZcome
down133RPdown
to134TOto
whether135INwhether
Congress136NPCongress
has137VHZhave
vested138VVNvest
the139DTthe
Board140NPBoard
with141INwith
the142DTthe
executive143JJexecutive
power144NNpower
of145INof
the146DTthe
national147JJnational
government148NNgovernment
or149CCor
,150,,
instead151RBinstead
,152,,
vested153VVDvest
the154DTthe
Board155NPBoard
with156INwith
the157DTthe
territorial158JJterritorial
executive159JJexecutive
power160NNpower
.161SENT.
The162DTthe
statute163NNstatute
that164WDTthat
created165VVDcreate
the166DTthe
Board167NPBoard
,168,,
PROMESA169NPPROMESA
,170,,
answers171VVZanswer
that172IN/thatthat
question173NNquestion
in174INin
a175DTa
straightforward176JJstraightforward
way177NNway
.178SENT.
It179PPit
...180:...
it181PPit
sets182VVZset
up183RPup
an184DTan
entity185NNentity
within186INwithin
the187DTthe
territorial188JJterritorial
government189NNgovernment
.190SENT.
It191PPit
gives192VVZgive
the193DTthe
Board194NPBoard
only195JJonly
territory-specific196JJterritory-specific
authority197NNauthority
and198CCand
instructs199VVZinstruct
the200DTthe
Board201NPBoard
to202TOto
pursue203VVpursue
only204RBonly
territory-specific205JJterritory-specific
objectives206NNSobjective
.207SENT.
The208DTthe
Board209NPBoard
acts210NNSact
on211INon
behalf212NNbehalf
of213INof
Puerto214NPPuerto
Rico215NPRico
as216INas
its217PP$its
representative218NNrepresentative
in219INin
judicial220JJjudicial
proceedings221NNSproceeding
to222TOto
restructure223VVrestructure
the224DTthe
territory225NNterritory
's226POS's
debts227NNSdebt
.228SENT.
It229PPit
pursues230VVZpursue
only231RBonly
Puerto232NPPuerto
Rico233NPRico
's234POS's
interests235NNSinterest
in236INin
those237DTthose
proceedings238NNSproceeding
.239SENT.
It240PPit
's241VBZbe
up242RBup
to243TOto
the244DTthe
Article245NPArticle
III246NPIII
court247NNcourt
that248WDTthat
adjudicates249VVZadjudicate
those250DTthose
proceedings251NNSproceeding
to252TOto
balance253VVbalance
all254PDTall
the255DTthe
competing256VVGcompete
interests257NNSinterest
.258SENT.
Congress259NPCongress
also260RBalso
instructed261VVDinstruct
the262DTthe
Board263NPBoard
to264TOto
implement265VVimplement
a266DTa
method267NNmethod
for268INfor
restoring269VVGrestore
fiscal270JJfiscal
stability271NNstability
.272SENT.
That273IN/thatthat
,274,,
too275RBtoo
,276,,
is277VBZbe
territorial278JJterritorial
authority279NNauthority
.280SENT.
It281PPit
reaches282VVZreach
only283RBonly
Puerto284NPPuerto
Rico285NPRico
's286POS's
budgeting287NNbudgeting
and288CCand
fiscal289JJfiscal
planning290NNplanning
,291,,
and292CCand
the293DTthe
Board294NPBoard
must295MDmust
exercise296VVexercise
that297DTthat
authority298NNauthority
in299INin
a300DTa
manner301NNmanner
that302WDTthat
protects303VVZprotect
Puerto304NPPuerto
Rico305NPRico
's306POS's
vital307JJvital
...308:...
vital309JJvital
interests310NNSinterest
.311SENT.
Now312RBnow
Congress313NPCongress
did314VVDdo
build315VVbuild
in316INin
protections317NNSprotection
to318TOto
guarantee319VVguarantee
the320DTthe
Board321NPBoard
's322POS's
independence323NNindependence
.324SENT.
Congress325NPCongress
did326VVDdo
that327IN/thatthat
because328INbecause
it329PPit
concluded330VVDconclude
that331IN/thatthat
Puerto332NPPuerto
Rico333NPRico
's334POS's
staggering335JJstaggering
financial336JJfinancial
and337CCand
humanitarian338JJhumanitarian
crisis339NNcrisis
could340MDcould
not341RBnot
be342VBbe
solved343VVNsolve
unless344INunless
the345DTthe
Board346NPBoard
was347VBDbe
insulated348VVNinsulate
from349INfrom
the350DTthe
political351JJpolitical
pressures352NNSpressure
that353WDTthat
caused354VVDcause
that355DTthat
crisis356NNcrisis
in357INin
the358DTthe
first359JJfirst
place360NNplace
.361SENT.
But362CCbut
Congress363NPCongress
also364RBalso
insulated365VVDinsulate
the366DTthe
Board367NPBoard
from368INfrom
federal369JJfederal
control370NNcontrol
.371SENT.
Board372NNboard
members373NNSmember
can374MDcan
be375VBbe
removed376VVNremove
only377RBonly
for378INfor
cause379NNcause
,380,,
which381WDTwhich
means382VVZmean
that383IN/thatthat
the384DTthe
President385NPPresident
cannot386MDcan
remove387VVremove
them388PPthem
based389VVNbase
on390INon
disagreement391NNdisagreement
with392INwith
the393DTthe
Board394NPBoard
's395POS's
policies396NNSpolicy
or397CCor
priorities398NNSpriority
in399INin
implementing400VVGimplement
PROMESA401NPPROMESA
.402SENT.
When403WRBwhen
you404PPyou
put405VVDput
all406RBall
that407IN/thatthat
together408RBtogether
,409,,
it410PPit
's411VBZbe
...412:...
the413DTthe
Board414NPBoard
is415VBZbe
in416INin
the417DTthe
territorial418JJterritorial
government419NNgovernment
,420,,
it421PPit
's422VHZhave
been423VBNbe
given424VVNgive
statutory425JJstatutory
directives426NNSdirective
to427TOto
advance428VVadvance
the429DTthe
interests430NNSinterest
of431INof
Puerto432NPPuerto
Rico433NPRico
,434,,
and435CCand
it436PPit
's437VBZbe
insulated438VVNinsulate
from439INfrom
federal440JJfederal
control441NNcontrol
,442,,
it443PPit
's444VBZbe
clear445JJclear
that446IN/thatthat
Board447NPBoard
members448NNSmember
are449VBPbe
territorial450JJterritorial
officials451NNSofficial
...452:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]453LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So454RBso
how455WRBhow
...456:...
[MR. VERRILLI]457LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...458:...
not459RBnot
officers460NNSofficer
of461INof
the462DTthe
United463NPUnited
States464NPSStates
.465SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]466LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Mister467NPMister
...468:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]469LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...470:...
how471WRBhow
can472MDcan
that473RBthat
be474VBbe
,475,,
Mr476NPMr
.477SENT.
Verrilli478NPVerrilli
?479SENT?
It480PPit
seems481VVZseem
to482TOto
me483PPme
that484IN/thatthat
your485PP$your
very486JJvery
argument487NNargument
that488IN/thatthat
it489PPit
's490VBZbe
independent491JJindependent
is492VBZbe
suggesting493VVGsuggest
it494PPit
can495MDcan
't496RB't
belong497VVbelong
to498TOto
the499DTthe
territory500NNterritory
and501CCand
that502IN/thatthat
there503EXthere
's504VBZbe
a505DTa
serious506JJserious
problem507NNproblem
that508IN/thatthat
the509DTthe
federal510JJfederal
government511NNgovernment
is512VBZbe
creating513VVGcreate
an514DTan
entity515NNentity
that516IN/thatthat
no517DTno
one518CDone
can519MDcan
control520VVcontrol
.521SENT.
Neither522CCneither
Congress523NPCongress
nor524CCnor
the525DTthe
President526NPPresident
can527MDcan
remove528VVremove
this529DTthis
entity530NNentity
for531INfor
anything532NNanything
but533CCbut
cause534NNcause
.535SENT.
Tell536VVtell
me537PPme
how538WRBhow
this539DTthis
differs540VVZdiffer
from541INfrom
a542DTa
U543NPU
.544SENT.
S545NPS
.546SENT.
attorney547NNattorney
.548SENT.
A549DTa
U550NPU
.551SENT.
S552NPS
.553SENT.
attorney554NNattorney
is555VBZbe
an556DTan
officer557NNofficer
of558INof
the559DTthe
United560NPUnited
States561NPSStates
.562SENT.
I563PPI
think564VVPthink
you565PPyou
accept566VVaccept
that567DTthat
.568SENT.
A569DTa
U570NPU
.571SENT.
S572NPS
.573SENT.
attorney574NNattorney
is575VBZbe
enforcing576VVGenforce
federal577JJfederal
law578NNlaw
in579INin
Puerto580NPPuerto
Rico581NPRico
,582,,
the583DTthe
U584NPU
.585SENT.
S586NPS
.587SENT.
attorney588NNattorney
of589INof
Puerto590NPPuerto
Rico591NPRico
,592,,
just593RBjust
the594DTthe
way595NNway
PROMESA596NPPROMESA
is597VBZbe
.598SENT.
And599CCand
a600DTa
U601NPU
.602SENT.
S603NPS
.604SENT.
attorney605NNattorney
does606VVZdo
n't607RBn't
have608VHhave
jurisdiction609NNjurisdiction
outside610NNoutside
of611INof
Puerto612NPPuerto
Rico613NPRico
.614SENT.
So615RBso
how616WRBhow
is617VBZbe
the618DTthe
U619NPU
.620SENT.
S621NPS
.622SENT.
attorney623NNattorney
different624JJdifferent
?625SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]626LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
So627RBso
let628VVlet
me629PPme
make630VVmake
a631DTa
general632JJgeneral
point633NNpoint
,634,,
and635CCand
then636RBthen
I637PPI
'll638MDwill
specifically639RBspecifically
answer640VVanswer
the641DTthe
U642NPU
.643SENT.
S644NPS
.645SENT.
attorney646NNattorney
question647NNquestion
.648SENT.
The649DTthe
general650JJgeneral
point651NNpoint
,652,,
I653PPI
think654VVPthink
it655PPit
's656VBZbe
important657JJimportant
to658TOto
make659VVmake
clear660JJclear
,661,,
we662PPwe
do663VVPdo
n't664RBn't
say665VVsay
,666,,
contrary667JJcontrary
to668TOto
our669PP$our
friends670NNSfriend
on671INon
the672DTthe
other673JJother
side674NNside
,675,,
that676IN/thatthat
the677DTthe
Appointments678NNSappointment
Clause679NNclause
does680VVZdo
n't681RBn't
apply682VVapply
in683INin
Puerto684NPPuerto
Rico685NPRico
.686SENT.
It687PPit
applies688VVZapply
in689INin
Puerto690NPPuerto
Rico691NPRico
just692RBjust
like693INlike
it694PPit
applies695VVZapply
in696INin
a697DTa
state698NNstate
,699,,
in700INin
that701WDTthat
federal702JJfederal
officials703NNSofficial
,704,,
officials705NNSofficial
who706WPwho
are707VBPbe
part708NNpart
of709INof
the710DTthe
federal711JJfederal
government712NNgovernment
,713,,
have714VHPhave
to715TOto
be716VBbe
appointed717VVNappoint
in718INin
conformity719NNconformity
with720INwith
the721DTthe
Appointments722NNSappointment
Clause723NNclause
...724:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]725LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Could726MDcould
you727PPyou
do728VVdo
this729DTthis
...730:...
could731MDcould
you732PPyou
pass733VVpass
...734:...
[MR. VERRILLI]735LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...736:...
including737VVGinclude
the738DTthe
U739NPU
.740SENT.
S741NPS
.742SENT.
attorney743NNattorney
.744SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]745LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...746:...
could747MDcould
you748PPyou
pass749VVpass
...750:...
could751MDcould
Congress752NPCongress
pass753VVpass
a754DTa
law755NNlaw
that756WDTthat
...757:...
like758INlike
PROMESA759NPPROMESA
for760INfor
a761DTa
state762NNstate
?763SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]764LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
No765NPNo
,766,,
I767PPI
do768VVPdo
n't769RBn't
think770VVthink
so771RBso
,772,,
because773INbecause
the774DTthe
difference775NNdifference
between776INbetween
that777DTthat
situation778NNsituation
and779CCand
this780DTthis
situation781NNsituation
is782VBZbe
Article783NPArticle
IV784NPIV
.785SENT.
And786CCand
I787PPI
really788RBreally
think789VVPthink
that790WDTthat
gets791VVZget
to792TOto
the793DTthe
heart794NNheart
of795INof
the796DTthe
matter797NNmatter
,798,,
Justice799NPJustice
Sotomayor800NPSotomayor
,801,,
that802WDTthat
I803PPI
think804VVPthink
the805DTthe
beef806NNbeef
that807IN/thatthat
my808PP$my
friends809NNSfriend
on810INon
the811DTthe
other812JJother
side813NNside
have814VHPhave
is815VBZbe
not816RBnot
with817INwith
the818DTthe
Appointments819NNSappointment
Clause820NNclause
;821:;
it822PPit
's823VBZbe
with824INwith
Article825NPArticle
IV826NPIV
.827SENT.
And828CCand
the829DTthe
difference830NNdifference
between831INbetween
this832DTthis
situation833NNsituation
and834CCand
a835DTa
state836NNstate
is837VBZbe
that838IN/thatthat
Congress839NPCongress
has840VHZhave
reserved841VVNreserve
authority842NNauthority
under843INunder
Article844NPArticle
IV845NPIV
to846TOto
alter847VValter
the848DTthe
structure849NNstructure
of850INof
a851DTa
territorial852JJterritorial
government853NNgovernment
and854CCand
to855TOto
prescribe856VVprescribe
territorial857JJterritorial
law858NNlaw
...859:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]860LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Could861MDcould
you862PPyou
...863:...
[MR. VERRILLI]864LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...865:...
its866PP$its
substantive867JJsubstantive
territorial868JJterritorial
law869NNlaw
.870SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]871LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
...872:...
could873MDcould
you874PPyou
give875VVgive
at876INat
least877JJSleast
a878DTa
quick879JJquick
answer880NNanswer
...881:...
[MR. VERRILLI]882LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Sure883NPSure
.884SENT.
I885PPI
'd886MDwould
be887VBbe
...888:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]889LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
...890:...
to891TOto
the892DTthe
first893JJfirst
part894NNpart
of895INof
Justice896NPJustice
Sotomayor897NPSotomayor
's898POS's
question899NNquestion
?900SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]901LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Yes902NPYes
.903SENT.
Of904INof
course905NNcourse
.906SENT.
The907DTthe
difference908NNdifference
,909,,
I910PPI
think911VVPthink
,912,,
the913DTthe
key914JJkey
difference915NNdifference
between916INbetween
a917DTa
U918NPU
.919SENT.
S920NPS
.921SENT.
attorney922NNattorney
and923CCand
the924DTthe
Board925NPBoard
is926VBZbe
that927IN/thatthat
the928DTthe
U929NPU
.930SENT.
S931NPS
.932SENT.
attorney933NNattorney
is934VBZbe
executing935VVGexecute
laws936NNSlaw
of937INof
nationwide938JJnationwide
application939NNapplication
,940,,
the941DTthe
...942:...
the943DTthe
U944NPU
.945SENT.
S946NPS
.947SENT.
Criminal948NPCriminal
Code949NPCode
,950,,
Title951NPTitle
18952CD@card@
.953SENT.
And954CCand
the955DTthe
U956NPU
.957SENT.
S958NPS
.959SENT.
attorney960NNattorney
in961INin
Puerto962NPPuerto
Rico963NPRico
in964INin
that965DTthat
respect966NNrespect
is967VBZbe
no968RBno
different969JJdifferent
than970INthan
the971DTthe
U972NPU
.973SENT.
S974NPS
.975SENT.
attorney976NNattorney
in977INin
New978NPNew
York979NPYork
.980SENT.
The981DTthe
Board982NPBoard
does983VVZdo
not984RBnot
implement985VVimplement
laws986NNSlaw
of987INof
nationwide988JJnationwide
application989NNapplication
.990SENT.
It991PPit
implements992VVZimplement
as993INas
law994NNlaw
...995:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]996LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But997CCbut
all998DTall
laws999NNSlaw
do1000VVPdo
n't1001RBn't
have1002VHhave
nationwide1003JJnationwide
application1004NNapplication
,1005,,
even1006RBeven
federal1007JJfederal
laws1008NNSlaw
.1009SENT.
Some1010DTsome
federal1011JJfederal
laws1012NNSlaw
have1013VHPhave
local1014JJlocal
application1015NNapplication
as1016INas
opposed1017VVNoppose
to1018TOto
national1019JJnational
.1020SENT.
They1021PPthey
're1022VBPbe
still1023RBstill
federal1024JJfederal
law1025NNlaw
because1026INbecause
they1027PPthey
were1028VBDbe
passed1029VVNpass
by1030INby
Congress1031NPCongress
and1032CCand
there1033RBthere
federal1034JJfederal
dictates1035NNSdictate
.1036SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]1037LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
But1038CCbut
...1039:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1040LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
This1041DTthis
is1042VBZbe
no1043RBno
different1044JJdifferent
for1045INfor
the1046DTthe
U1047NPU
.1048SENT.
S1049NPS
.1050SENT.
attorney1051NNattorney
.1052SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]1053LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
I1054PPI
do1055VVPdo
think1056VVthink
it1057PPit
's1058VBZbe
different1059JJdifferent
in1060INin
a1061DTa
fundamental1062JJfundamental
way1063NNway
,1064,,
Your1065PP$your
Honor1066NPHonor
.1067SENT.
It1068PPit
is1069VBZbe
territory-specific1070JJterritory-specific
.1071SENT.
It1072PPit
applies1073VVZapply
only1074RBonly
to1075TOto
the1076DTthe
territory1077NNterritory
of1078INof
Puerto1079NPPuerto
Rico1080NPRico
.1081SENT.
And1082CCand
the1083DTthe
Board1084NPBoard
's1085POS's
authority1086NNauthority
is1087VBZbe
to1088TOto
...1089:...
is1090VBZbe
to1091TOto
act1092VVact
in1093INin
the1094DTthe
interests1095NNSinterest
of1096INof
the1097DTthe
territory1098NNterritory
of1099INof
Puerto1100NPPuerto
Rico1101NPRico
in1102INin
the1103DTthe
...1104:...
in1105INin
their1106PP$their
...1107:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1108LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well1109UHWell
,1110,,
Mr1111NPMr
.1112SENT.
Verrilli1113NPVerrilli
,1114,,
I1115PPI
mean1116VVPmean
,1117,,
suppose1118VVPsuppose
that1119IN/thatthat
Congress1120NPCongress
looks1121VVZlook
at1122INat
Florida1123NPFlorida
and1124CCand
it1125PPit
says1126VVZsay
that1127IN/thatthat
there1128EXthere
are1129VBPbe
a1130DTa
lot1131NNlot
of1132INof
hurricanes1133NNShurricane
there1134RBthere
and1135CCand
the1136DTthe
waters1137NNSwater
are1138VBPbe
rising1139VVGrise
,1140,,
and1141CCand
we1142PPwe
have1143VHPhave
a1144DTa
terrible1145JJterrible
Florida1146NPFlorida
problem1147NNproblem
.1148SENT.
And1149CCand
Congress1150NPCongress
passes1151VVZpass
the1152DTthe
Florida1153NPFlorida
Reclamation1154NNreclamation
Act1155NPAct
,1156,,
and1157CCand
it1158PPit
's1159VBZbe
supposed1160VVNsuppose
to1161TOto
deal1162VVdeal
with1163INwith
,1164,,
you1165PPyou
know1166VVPknow
,1167,,
the1168DTthe
Florida1169NPFlorida
problem1170NNproblem
that1171IN/thatthat
it1172PPit
perceives1173VVZperceive
but1174CCbut
uses1175VVZuse
federal1176JJfederal
law1177NNlaw
to1178TOto
do1179VVdo
so1180RBso
.1181SENT.
Would1182MDwould
you1183PPyou
say1184VVsay
that1185DTthat
...1186:...
I1187PPI
think1188VVPthink
the1189DTthe
...1190:...
your1191PP$your
...1192:...
your1193PP$your
phrase1194NNphrase
was1195VBDbe
the1196DTthe
executive1197JJexecutive
power1198NNpower
of1199INof
the1200DTthe
national1201JJnational
government1202NNgovernment
.1203SENT.
Would1204MDwould
the1205DTthe
head1206NNhead
of1207INof
the1208DTthe
agency1209NNagency
that1210IN/thatthat
the1211DTthe
Florida1212NPFlorida
Reclamation1213NNreclamation
Act1214NPAct
sets1215VVZset
up1216RBup
be1217VBbe
exercising1218VVGexercise
the1219DTthe
executive1220JJexecutive
power1221NNpower
of1222INof
the1223DTthe
national1224JJnational
government1225NNgovernment
?1226SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]1227LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Yes1228NPYes
.1229SENT.
And1230CCand
the1231DTthe
difference1232NNdifference
is1233VBZbe
...1234:...
I1235PPI
'm1236VBPbe
sorry1237JJsorry
,1238,,
Your1239PP$your
Honor1240NPHonor
.1241SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1242LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
No1243NPNo
,1244,,
I1245PPI
was1246VBDbe
just1247RBjust
going1248VVGgo
to1249TOto
say1250VVsay
,1251,,
what1252WPwhat
is1253VBZbe
the1254DTthe
difference1255NNdifference
,1256,,
Mr1257NPMr
.1258SENT.
Verrilli1259NPVerrilli
?1260SENT?
[1261SYM[
LAUGHTER1262NNlaughter
]1263SYM]
[MR. VERRILLI]1264LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
And1265CCand
the1266DTthe
difference1267NNdifference
...1268:...
and1269CCand
the1270DTthe
difference1271NNdifference
is1272VBZbe
...1273:...
and1274CCand
the1275DTthe
difference1276NNdifference
is1277VBZbe
that1278DTthat
...1279:...
that1280IN/thatthat
Congress1281NPCongress
has1282VHZhave
dual1283JJdual
authority1284NNauthority
with1285INwith
respect1286NNrespect
to1287TOto
the1288DTthe
territories1289NNSterritory
to1290TOto
act1291VVact
under1292INunder
Article1293NPArticle
I1294NPI
with1295INwith
nation1296NNnation
...1297:...
laws1298NNSlaw
of1299INof
nationwide1300JJnationwide
application1301NNapplication
,1302,,
which1303WDTwhich
are1304VBPbe
enforced1305VVNenforce
by1306INby
federal1307JJfederal
officials1308NNSofficial
.1309SENT.
For1310INfor
example1311NNexample
,1312,,
there1313EXthere
's1314VBZbe
a1315DTa
FEMA1316NPFEMA
regional1317JJregional
administrator1318NNadministrator
.1319SENT.
There1320EXthere
's1321VBZbe
an1322DTan
EPA1323NPEPA
regional1324JJregional
administrator1325NNadministrator
.1326SENT.
They1327PPthey
're1328VBPbe
all1329RBall
appointed1330VVNappoint
in1331INin
conformity1332NNconformity
with1333INwith
the1334DTthe
requirements1335NNSrequirement
of1336INof
the1337DTthe
Appointments1338NNSappointment
Clause1339NNclause
.1340SENT.
But1341CCbut
it1342PPit
has1343VHZhave
dual1344JJdual
authority1345NNauthority
.1346SENT.
It1347PPit
can1348MDcan
also1349RBalso
act1350VVact
as1351INas
a1352DTa
territorial1353JJterritorial
legislature1354NNlegislature
,1355,,
and1356CCand
...1357:...
and1358CCand
under1359INunder
Article1360NPArticle
IV1361NPIV
,1362,,
it1363PPit
has1364VHZhave
plenary1365JJplenary
authority1366NNauthority
to1367TOto
do1368VVdo
so1369RBso
.1370SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1371LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well1372UHWell
,1373,,
how1374WRBhow
do1375VVPdo
we1376PPwe
know1377VVPknow
which1378WDTwhich
...1379:...
which1380WDTwhich
authority1381NNauthority
it1382PPit
's1383VBZbe
using1384VVGuse
?1385SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]1386LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Well1387UHwell
,1388,,
you1389PPyou
look1390VVPlook
...1391:...
I1392PPI
...1393:...
I1394PPI
think1395VVPthink
as1396RBas
...1397:...
we1398PPwe
think1399VVPthink
Palmore1400NPPalmore
is1401VBZbe
the1402DTthe
relevant1403JJrelevant
precedent1404NNprecedent
there1405RBthere
.1406SENT.
And1407CCand
I1408PPI
think1409VVPthink
what1410WPwhat
you1411PPyou
do1412VVPdo
is1413VBZbe
you1414PPyou
look1415VVPlook
to1416TOto
two1417CDtwo
things1418NNSthing
.1419SENT.
First1420NPFirst
,1421,,
what1422WPwhat
does1423VVZdo
it1424PPit
...1425:...
what1426WPwhat
does1427VVZdo
Congress1428NPCongress
say1429VVsay
it1430PPit
's1431VBZbe
doing1432VVGdo
.1433SENT.
Here1434RBhere
,1435,,
Congress1436NPCongress
said1437VVDsay
expressly1438RBexpressly
we1439PPwe
're1440VBPbe
invoking1441VVGinvoke
Article1442NPArticle
IV1443NPIV
and1444CCand
we1445PPwe
're1446VBPbe
creating1447VVGcreate
an1448DTan
entity1449NNentity
in1450INin
the1451DTthe
territorial1452JJterritorial
government1453NNgovernment
.1454SENT.
That1455DTthat
's1456VBZbe
the1457DTthe
...1458:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]1459LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
What1460WPWhat
...1461:...
what's1462NNSwhat's
...1463:...
[MR. VERRILLI]1464LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...1465:...
language1466NNlanguage
of1467INof
the1468DTthe
statute1469NNstatute
,1470,,
entity1471NNentity
...1472:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]1473LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...1474:...
what1475WPwhat
's1476VBZbe
the1477DTthe
argument1478NNargument
,1479,,
Mr1480NPMr
.1481SENT.
Verrilli1482NPVerrilli
...1483:...
you1484PPyou
started1485VVDstart
with1486INwith
this1487DTthis
is1488VBZbe
an1489DTan
...1490:...
this1491DTthis
is1492VBZbe
an1493DTan
entity1494NNentity
within1495INwithin
the1496DTthe
Puerto1497NPPuerto
Rico1498NPRico
government1499NNgovernment
.1500SENT.
The1501DTthe
argument1502NNargument
on1503INon
the1504DTthe
other1505JJother
side1506NNside
is1507VBZbe
no1508UHno
,1509,,
it1510PPit
's1511VBZbe
not1512RBnot
within1513INwithin
;1514:;
it1515PPit
's1516VBZbe
above1517JJabove
.1518SENT.
It1519PPit
's1520VBZbe
above1521INabove
the1522DTthe
Puerto1523NPPuerto
Rican1524JJRican
government1525NNgovernment
,1526,,
and1527CCand
it1528PPit
's1529VBZbe
...1530:...
it1531PPit
's1532VBZbe
above1533INabove
the1534DTthe
legislature1535NNlegislature
and1536CCand
the1537DTthe
governor1538NNgovernor
.1539SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]1540LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Yes1541NPYes
,1542,,
and1543CCand
that1544WDTthat
's1545VBZbe
...1546:...
and1547CCand
that1548DTthat
's1549VBZbe
simply1550RBsimply
an1551DTan
incorrect1552JJincorrect
characterization1553NNcharacterization
.1554SENT.
I1555PPI
think1556VVPthink
it1557PPit
misinterprets1558VVZmisinterpret
independence1559NNindependence
for1560INfor
superintendence1561NNsuperintendence
.1562SENT.
And1563CCand
I1564PPI
think1565VVPthink
,1566,,
if1567INif
you1568PPyou
think1569VVPthink
about1570INabout
it1571PPit
,1572,,
it1573PPit
's1574VBZbe
just1575RBjust
not1576RBnot
right1577JJright
to1578TOto
say1579VVsay
that1580IN/thatthat
what1581WPwhat
you1582PPyou
've1583VHPhave
got1584VVNget
here1585RBhere
is1586VBZbe
a1587DTa
federal1588JJfederal
overlord1589NNoverlord
or1590CCor
a1591DTa
federal1592JJfederal
master1593NNmaster
in1594INin
the1595DTthe
language1596NNlanguage
of1597INof
...1598:...
of1599INof
the1600DTthe
First1601NPFirst
Circuit1602NPCircuit
,1603,,
because1604INbecause
think1605VVPthink
about1606RBabout
what1607WPwhat
Congress1608NPCongress
did1609VVDdo
here1610RBhere
.1611SENT.
First1612RBfirst
,1613,,
it1614PPit
said1615VVDsay
that1616IN/thatthat
the1617DTthe
...1618:...
that1619IN/thatthat
the1620DTthe
Board1621NPBoard
's1622POS's
authority1623NNauthority
is1624VBZbe
territory-specific1625JJterritory-specific
,1626,,
and1627CCand
then1628RBthen
it1629PPit
said1630VVDsay
that1631IN/thatthat
the1632DTthe
Board1633NPBoard
is1634VBZbe
supposed1635VVNsuppose
to1636TOto
act1637VVact
on1638INon
behalf1639NNbehalf
of1640INof
Puerto1641NPPuerto
Rico1642NPRico
and1643CCand
represent1644VVrepresent
Puerto1645NPPuerto
Rico1646NPRico
in1647INin
the1648DTthe
restructuring1649NNrestructuring
proceedings1650NNSproceeding
.1651SENT.
It1652PPit
's1653VBZbe
not1654RBnot
supposed1655VVNsuppose
to1656TOto
advance1657VVadvance
the1658DTthe
broad1659JJbroad
interests1660NNSinterest
of1661INof
the1662DTthe
United1663NPUnited
States1664NPSStates
.1665SENT.
It1666PPit
advances1667VVZadvance
Puerto1668NPPuerto
Rico1669NPRico
's1670POS's
interests1671NNSinterest
.1672SENT.
And1673CCand
,1674,,
similarly1675RBsimilarly
,1676,,
with1677INwith
respect1678NNrespect
to1679TOto
its1680PP$its
budget1681NNbudget
...1682:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]1683LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well1684UHWell
,1685,,
was1686VBDbe
n't1687RBn't
Congress1688NPCongress
thinking1689NNthinking
about1690INabout
the1691DTthe
broad1692JJbroad
interests1693NNSinterest
of1694INof
the1695DTthe
United1696NPUnited
States1697NPSStates
?1698SENT?
I1699PPI
mean1700VVPmean
,1701,,
here1702RBhere
it1703PPit
was1704VBDbe
.1705SENT.
It1706PPit
was1707VBDbe
looking1708VVGlook
at1709INat
this1710DTthis
terrible1711JJterrible
financial1712JJfinancial
crisis1713NNcrisis
in1714INin
Puerto1715NPPuerto
Rico1716NPRico
and1717CCand
considering1718VVGconsider
a1719DTa
wide1720JJwide
variety1721NNvariety
of1722INof
options1723NNSoption
to1724TOto
address1725VVaddress
that1726DTthat
crisis1727NNcrisis
.1728SENT.
Now1729RBnow
one1730CDone
option1731NNoption
could1732MDcould
have1733VHhave
been1734VBNbe
some1735DTsome
kind1736NNkind
of1737INof
financial1738JJfinancial
bailout1739NNbailout
.1740SENT.
Congress1741NPCongress
did1742VVDdo
n't1743RBn't
want1744VVwant
to1745TOto
do1746VVdo
that1747DTthat
.1748SENT.
It1749PPit
instead1750RBinstead
chose1751VVDchoose
an1752DTan
option1753NNoption
that1754WDTthat
had1755VHDhave
less1756RBRless
financial1757JJfinancial
cost1758NNcost
for1759INfor
the1760DTthe
American1761JJAmerican
people1762NNSpeople
as1763INas
a1764DTa
whole1765NNwhole
.1766SENT.
So1767RBso
,1768,,
you1769PPyou
know1770VVPknow
,1771,,
why1772WRBwhy
should1773MDshould
n't1774RBn't
we1775PPwe
think1776VVPthink
that1777IN/thatthat
Congress1778NPCongress
,1779,,
in1780INin
enacting1781VVGenact
this1782DTthis
piece1783NNpiece
of1784INof
legislation1785NNlegislation
,1786,,
was1787VBDbe
not1788RBnot
thinking1789VVGthink
about1790INabout
it1791PPit
through1792INthrough
a1793DTa
broad1794JJbroad
national1795JJnational
lens1796NNlens
?1797SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]1798LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
First1799NPFirst
,1800,,
I1801PPI
think1802VVPthink
what1803WPwhat
matters1804VVZmatter
is1805VBZbe
what1806WPwhat
Congress1807NPCongress
did1808VVDdo
,1809,,
not1810RBnot
what1811WPwhat
the1812DTthe
motivations1813NNSmotivation
of1814INof
individual1815JJindividual
legislatures1816NNSlegislature
were1817VBDbe
in1818INin
moving1819VVGmove
forward1820RBforward
with1821INwith
what1822WPwhat
Congress1823NPCongress
did1824VVDdo
.1825SENT.
Second1826RBsecond
,1827,,
the1828DTthe
best1829JJSgood
evidence1830NNevidence
of1831INof
what1832WPwhat
Congress1833NPCongress
did1834VVDdo
is1835VBZbe
the1836DTthe
statute1837NNstatute
itself1838PPitself
,1839,,
where1840WRBwhere
it1841PPit
made1842VVDmake
a1843DTa
choice1844NNchoice
to1845TOto
create1846VVcreate
an1847DTan
entity1848NNentity
in1849INin
Puerto1850NPPuerto
Rico1851NPRico
and1852CCand
it1853PPit
instructed1854VVDinstruct
it1855PPit
to1856TOto
act1857VVact
on1858INon
behalf1859NNbehalf
of1860INof
Puerto1861NPPuerto
Rico1862NPRico
.1863SENT.
And1864CCand
even1865RBeven
with1866INwith
respect1867NNrespect
to1868TOto
its1869PP$its
budgeting1870NNbudgeting
authority1871NNauthority
,1872,,
it1873PPit
said1874VVDsay
when1875WRBwhen
you1876PPyou
do1877VVPdo
your1878PP$your
budgeting1879NNbudgeting
and1880CCand
fiscal1881JJfiscal
planning1882NNplanning
,1883,,
you1884PPyou
've1885VHPhave
got1886VVNget
to1887TOto
ensure1888VVensure
that1889IN/thatthat
there1890EXthere
's1891VBZbe
adequate1892JJadequate
funding1893NNfunding
for1894INfor
essential1895JJessential
services1896NNSservice
in1897INin
Puerto1898NPPuerto
Rico1899NPRico
,1900,,
adequate1901JJadequate
funding1902NNfunding
for1903INfor
the1904DTthe
Puerto1905NPPuerto
Rico1906NPRico
pension1907NNpension
plan1908NNplan
,1909,,
adequate1910JJadequate
funding1911NNfunding
for1912INfor
economic1913JJeconomic
development1914NNdevelopment
in1915INin
Puerto1916NPPuerto
Rico1917NPRico
.1918SENT.
It1919PPit
told1920VVDtell
this1921DTthis
Board1922NPBoard
to1923TOto
act1924VVact
for1925INfor
Puerto1926NPPuerto
Rico1927NPRico
.1928SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1929LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Counsel1930NPCounsel
,1931,,
what1932WPwhat
if1933INif
we1934PPwe
do1935VVPdo
n't1936RBn't
think1937VVthink
it1938PPit
's1939VBZbe
an1940DTan
all1941RBall
or1942CCor
nothing1943NNnothing
division1944NNdivision
when1945WRBwhen
you1946PPyou
look1947VVPlook
at1948INat
the1949DTthe
responsibilities1950NNSresponsibility
of1951INof
the1952DTthe
Board1953NPBoard
?1954SENT?
I1955PPI
mean1956VVPmean
,1957,,
certainly1958RBcertainly
much1959RBmuch
of1960INof
it1961PPit
has1962VHZhave
to1963TOto
do1964VVdo
with1965INwith
territorial1966JJterritorial
issues1967NNSissue
,1968,,
but1969CCbut
you1970PPyou
can1971MDcan
certainly1972RBcertainly
appreciate1973VVappreciate
congressmen1974NNScongressman
viewing1975VVGview
this1976DTthis
obviously1977RBobviously
as1978INas
something1979NNsomething
with1980INwith
nationwide1981JJnationwide
significance1982NNsignificance
.1983SENT.
So1984RBso
,1985,,
to1986TOto
some1987DTsome
extent1988NNextent
,1989,,
it1990PPit
's1991VBZbe
dealing1992VVGdeal
with1993INwith
territorial1994JJterritorial
issues1995NNSissue
.1996SENT.
To1997TOTo
some1998DTsome
extent1999NNextent
,2000,,
it2001PPit
's2002VBZbe
dealing2003VVGdeal
with2004INwith
issues2005NNSissue
of2006INof
broader2007JJRbroad
national2008JJnational
significance2009NNsignificance
.2010SENT.
What2011WPWhat
happens2012VVZhappen
to2013TOto
your2014PP$your
case2015NNcase
in2016INin
that2017DTthat
instance2018NNinstance
?2019SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]2020LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
I2021PPI
think2022VVPthink
it2023PPit
's2024VBZbe
...2025:...
I2026PPI
think2027VVPthink
the2028DTthe
answer2029NNanswer
is2030VBZbe
the2031DTthe
same2032JJsame
,2033,,
because2034INbecause
what2035WPwhat
matters2036VVZmatter
is2037VBZbe
the2038DTthe
power2039NNpower
that2040IN/thatthat
Congress2041NPCongress
chose2042VVDchoose
to2043TOto
invoke2044VVinvoke
and2045CCand
the2046DTthe
way2047NNway
in2048INin
which2049WDTwhich
Congress2050NPCongress
chose2051VVDchoose
to2052TOto
act2053VVact
.2054SENT.
And2055CCand
what2056WPwhat
Congress2057NPCongress
did2058VVDdo
here2059RBhere
was2060VBDbe
tell2061VVtell
the2062DTthe
Board2063NPBoard
the2064DTthe
way2065NNway
to2066TOto
address2067VVaddress
this2068DTthis
problem2069NNproblem
is2070VBZbe
by2071INby
acting2072VVGact
in2073INin
the2074DTthe
interests2075NNSinterest
of2076INof
Puerto2077NPPuerto
Rico2078NPRico
.2079SENT.
And2080CCand
then2081RBthen
it2082PPit
also2083RBalso
insulated2084VVDinsulate
the2085DTthe
Board2086NPBoard
from2087INfrom
federal2088JJfederal
control2089NNcontrol
through2090INthrough
the2091DTthe
for2092INfor
cause2093NNcause
standard2094NNstandard
.2095SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2096LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
May2097MDmay
I2098PPI
ask2099VVask
you2100PPyou
,2101,,
if2102INif
we2103PPwe
had2104VHDhave
the2105DTthe
original2106JJoriginal
act2107NNact
setting2108VVGset
up2109RPup
the2110DTthe
U2111NPU
.2112SENT.
S2113NPS
.2114SENT.
Attorney2115NNattorney
for2116INfor
Puerto2117NPPuerto
Rico2118NPRico
and2119CCand
Congress2120NPCongress
changed2121VVDchange
only2122RBonly
one2123CDone
label2124NNlabel
of2125INof
the2126DTthe
three2127CDthree
Palmore2128NPPalmore
factors2129NNSfactor
,2130,,
same2131JJsame
factual2132JJfactual
situation2133NNsituation
as2134RBas
exists2135VVZexist
now2136RBnow
,2137,,
except2138INexcept
that2139WDTthat
it2140PPit
says2141VVZsay
we2142PPwe
're2143VBPbe
doing2144VVGdo
it2145PPit
under2146INunder
the2147DTthe
territorial2148JJterritorial
clause2149NNclause
.2150SENT.
You2151PPyou
're2152VBPbe
suggesting2153VVGsuggest
that2154IN/thatthat
that2155DTthat
's2156VBZbe
enough2157RBenough
reason2158NNreason
for2159INfor
why2160NNwhy
...2161:...
[MR. VERRILLI]2162LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Absolutely2163RBabsolutely
...2164:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2165LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...2166:...
our2167PP$our
...2168:...
[MR. VERRILLI]2169LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...2170:...
absolutely2171RBabsolutely
not2172RBnot
,2173,,
Your2174PP$your
Honor2175NPHonor
.2176SENT.
And2177CCand
that2178DTthat
's2179VBZbe
why2180WRBwhy
the2181DTthe
third2182JJthird
factor2183NNfactor
in2184INin
Palmore2185NPPalmore
is2186VBZbe
the2187DTthe
critical2188JJcritical
one2189CDone
.2190SENT.
You2191PPyou
have2192VHPhave
to2193TOto
look2194VVlook
at2195INat
the2196DTthe
nature2197NNnature
of2198INof
the2199DTthe
authority2200NNauthority
that2201IN/thatthat
the2202DTthe
office2203NNoffice
is2204VBZbe
executing2205VVGexecute
.2206SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2207LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
All2208DTall
right2209NNright
.2210SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]2211LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
And2212CCand
they2213PPthey
...2214:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2215LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Now2216RBnow
let2217VVlet
me2218PPme
ask2219VVask
you2220PPyou
how2221WRBhow
you2222PPyou
can2223MDcan
label2224VVlabel
this2225DTthis
a2226DTa
territorial2227JJterritorial
officer2228NNofficer
as2229INas
opposed2230VVNoppose
to2231TOto
a2232DTa
federal2233JJfederal
officer2234NNofficer
handling2235VVGhandle
federal2236JJfederal
issues2237NNSissue
...2238:...
a2239DTa
federal2240JJfederal
mandate2241NNmandate
when2242WRBwhen
none2243NNnone
of2244INof
the2245DTthe
people2246NNSpeople
of2247INof
Puerto2248NPPuerto
Rico2249NPRico
have2250VHPhave
voted2251VVNvote
in2252INin
any2253DTany
way2254NNway
to2255TOto
...2256:...
on2257INon
any2258DTany
of2259INof
the2260DTthe
directives2261NNSdirective
that2262IN/thatthat
this2263DTthis
agent2264NNagent
has2265VHZhave
received2266VVNreceive
?2267SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]2268LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
I2269PPI
...2270:...
I2271PPI
understand2272VVPunderstand
that2273DTthat
point2274NNpoint
,2275,,
Your2276PP$your
Honor2277NPHonor
.2278SENT.
But2279CCbut
,2280,,
again2281RBagain
,2282,,
I2283PPI
do2284VVPdo
n't2285RBn't
think2286VVthink
that2287WDTthat
has2288VHZhave
anything2289NNanything
to2290TOto
do2291VVdo
with2292INwith
the2293DTthe
Appointments2294NNSappointment
Clause2295NNclause
.2296SENT.
There2297EXthere
is2298VBZbe
no2299DTno
doubt2300NNdoubt
under2301INunder
this2302DTthis
Court2303NPCourt
's2304POS's
precedence2305NNprecedence
,2306,,
starting2307VVGstart
two2308CDtwo
centuries2309NNScentury
ago2310RBago
,2311,,
and2312CCand
as2313RBas
recently2314RBrecently
as2315INas
Sanchez2316NPSanchez
Valle2317NPValle
,2318,,
that2319IN/thatthat
the2320DTthe
Congress2321NPCongress
has2322VHZhave
reserved2323VVNreserve
authority2324NNauthority
to2325TOto
act2326VVact
at2327INat
the2328DTthe
territorial2329JJterritorial
level2330NNlevel
and2331CCand
to2332TOto
change2333VVchange
the2334DTthe
structure2335NNstructure
of2336INof
...2337:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2338LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Certainly2339RBcertainly
.2340SENT.
There2341EXthere
's2342VBZbe
no2343DTno
question2344NNquestion
.2345SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]2346LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...2347:...
territorial2348JJterritorial
government2349NNgovernment
and2350CCand
to2351TOto
change2352VVchange
the2353DTthe
substance2354NNsubstance
.2355SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2356LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
There2357EXthere
's2358VBZbe
no2359DTno
fight2360NNfight
...2361:...
there2362EXthere
's2363VBZbe
no2364DTno
fight2365NNfight
there2366RBthere
.2367SENT.
The2368DTthe
issue2369NNissue
is2370VBZbe
where2371WRBwhere
do2372VVPdo
you2373PPyou
draw2374VVdraw
a2375DTa
line2376NNline
between2377INbetween
what2378WPwhat
's2379VBZbe
a2380DTa
federal2381JJfederal
officer2382NNofficer
and2383CCand
what2384WPwhat
's2385VBZbe
a2386DTa
territorial2387JJterritorial
officer2388NNofficer
.2389SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]2390LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
And2391CCand
I2392PPI
think2393VVPthink
...2394:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2395LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
And2396CCand
the2397DTthe
issue2398NNissue
has2399VHZhave
to2400TOto
be2401VBbe
that2402IN/thatthat
when2403WRBwhen
Congress2404NPCongress
chooses2405VVZchoose
,2406,,
it2407PPit
's2408VBZbe
Congress2409NPCongress
's2410POS's
choice2411NNchoice
.2412SENT.
If2413INif
the2414DTthe
territory2415NNterritory
chooses2416VVZchoose
,2417,,
if2418INif
it2419PPit
elects2420VVZelect
a2421DTa
governor2422NNgovernor
,2423,,
if2424INif
it2425PPit
elects2426VVZelect
legislature2427NNlegislature
,2428,,
if2429INif
it2430PPit
elects2431VVZelect
its2432PP$its
own2433JJown
Attorney2434NPAttorney
General2435NPGeneral
,2436,,
that2437IN/thatthat
those2438DTthose
are2439VBPbe
officers2440NNSofficer
that2441IN/thatthat
Puerto2442NPPuerto
Rico2443NPRico
have2444VHPhave
selected2445VVNselect
.2446SENT.
But2447CCbut
,2448,,
if2449INif
the2450DTthe
federal2451JJfederal
government2452NNgovernment
is2453VBZbe
making2454VVGmake
the2455DTthe
selection2456NNselection
and2457CCand
imposing2458VVGimpose
it2459PPit
on2460INon
a2461DTa
territory2462NNterritory
,2463,,
it2464PPit
has2465VHZhave
to2466TOto
be2467VBbe
a2468DTa
federal2469JJfederal
officer2470NNofficer
.2471SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]2472LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
I2473PPI
...2474:...
that2475WDTthat
's2476VBZbe
...2477:...
I2478PPI
...2479:...
I2480PPI
...2481:...
I2482PPI
think2483VVPthink
that2484WDTthat
's2485VBZbe
just2486RBjust
not2487RBnot
right2488JJright
on2489INon
numerous2490JJnumerous
levels2491NNSlevel
,2492,,
Your2493PP$your
Honor2494NPHonor
,2495,,
and2496CCand
...2497:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2498LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
No2499RBno
,2500,,
it2501PPit
's2502VBZbe
too2503RBtoo
simplistic2504JJsimplistic
for2505INfor
you2506PPyou
.2507SENT.
[2508SYM[
LAUGHTER2509NNlaughter
]2510SYM]
[MR. VERRILLI]2511LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
No2512UHNo
,2513,,
no2514UHno
,2515,,
no2516UHno
,2517,,
no2518UHno
.2519SENT.
The2520DTthe
main2521JJmain
...2522:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2523LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That's2524NPThat's
...2525:...
that2526WDTthat
's2527VBZbe
the2528DTthe
problem2529NNproblem
that2530IN/thatthat
everybody2531NNeverybody
...2532:...
[MR. VERRILLI]2533LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...2534:...
one2535CDone
of2536INof
the2537DTthe
main2538JJmain
reasons2539NNSreason
which2540WDTwhich
it2541PPit
's2542VBZbe
not2543RBnot
right2544RBright
,2545,,
I2546PPI
think2547VVPthink
,2548,,
is2549VBZbe
that2550IN/thatthat
it2551PPit
's2552VBZbe
not2553RBnot
consistent2554JJconsistent
with2555INwith
the2556DTthe
history2557NNhistory
of2558INof
this2559DTthis
country2560NNcountry
.2561SENT.
And2562CCand
if2563INif
you2564PPyou
start2565VVPstart
with2566INwith
the2567DTthe
mayor2568NNmayor
of2569INof
Washington2570NPWashington
in2571INin
18022572CD@card@
...2573:...
now2574RBnow
,2575,,
admittedly2576RBadmittedly
,2577,,
it2578PPit
's2579VBZbe
the2580DTthe
Enclave2581NNenclave
Clause2582NNclause
,2583,,
not2584RBnot
the2585DTthe
Territories2586NPTerritories
Clause2587NNclause
,2588,,
but2589CCbut
the2590DTthe
Court2591NPCourt
has2592VHZhave
said2593VVNsay
that2594IN/thatthat
there2595EXthere
are2596VBPbe
provisions2597NNSprovision
that2598WDTthat
should2599MDshould
be2600VBbe
read2601VVNread
in2602INin
the2603DTthe
same2604JJsame
way2605NNway
...2606:...
if2607INif
...2608:...
if2609INif
you2610PPyou
start2611VVPstart
with2612INwith
that2613DTthat
,2614,,
the2615DTthe
mayor2616NNmayor
of2617INof
Washington2618NPWashington
was2619VBDbe
appointed2620VVNappoint
...2621:...
was2622VBDbe
...2623:...
Congress2624NPCongress
created2625VVDcreate
the2626DTthe
position2627NNposition
of2628INof
mayor2629NNmayor
of2630INof
Washington2631NPWashington
under2632INunder
a2633DTa
statute2634NNstatute
.2635SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2636LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
That2637DTthat
...2638:...
that2639WDTthat
's2640VBZbe
one2641CDone
...2642:...
I2643PPI
mean2644VVPmean
,2645,,
that2646WDTthat
's2647VBZbe
one2648CDone
example2649NNexample
.2650SENT.
But2651CCbut
the2652DTthe
other2653JJother
side2654NNside
says2655VVZsay
the2656DTthe
historical2657JJhistorical
practice2658NNpractice
is2659VBZbe
otherwise2660RBotherwise
overwhelming2661JJoverwhelming
in2662INin
...2663:...
up2664RBup
until2665INuntil
about2666INabout
the2667DTthe
1950s2668NNS1950s
,2669,,
of2670INof
saying2671VVGsay
that2672IN/thatthat
territorial2673JJterritorial
officers2674NNSofficer
had2675VHDhave
to2676TOto
be2677VBbe
appointed2678VVNappoint
by2679INby
the2680DTthe
President2681NPPresident
with2682INwith
the2683DTthe
advice2684NNadvice
and2685CCand
consent2686NNconsent
of2687INof
the2688DTthe
Senate2689NPSenate
.2690SENT.
So2691RBso
how2692WRBhow
do2693VVPdo
we2694PPwe
deal2695VVdeal
with2696INwith
that2697DTthat
historical2698JJhistorical
practice2699NNpractice
?2700SENT?
You2701PPyou
do2702VVPdo
have2703VHhave
the2704DTthe
mayor2705NNmayor
example2706NNexample
,2707,,
so2708RBso
it2709PPit
's2710VBZbe
not2711RBnot
uniform2712JJuniform
.2713SENT.
But2714CCbut
how2715WRBhow
do2716VVPdo
we2717PPwe
deal2718VVdeal
with2719INwith
that2720DTthat
historical2721JJhistorical
practice2722NNpractice
?2723SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]2724LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Two2725CDTwo
points2726NNSpoint
.2727SENT.
First2728JJfirst
on2729INon
the2730DTthe
mayor2731NNmayor
.2732SENT.
I2733PPI
think2734VVPthink
the2735DTthe
mayor2736NNmayor
of2737INof
Washington2738NPWashington
is2739VBZbe
an2740DTan
extremely2741RBextremely
significant2742JJsignificant
historical2743JJhistorical
marker2744NNmarker
because2745INbecause
,2746,,
after2747INafter
all2748DTall
,2749,,
the2750DTthe
Presidents2751NPSPresidents
who2752WPwho
made2753VVDmake
those2754DTthose
appointments2755NNSappointment
every2756DTevery
year2757NNyear
during2758INduring
that2759DTthat
period2760NNperiod
were2761VBDbe
Jefferson2762NPJefferson
and2763CCand
Madison2764NPMadison
,2765,,
and2766CCand
if2767INif
they2768PPthey
had2769VHDhave
thought2770VVNthink
that2771IN/thatthat
their2772PP$their
...2773:...
that2774IN/thatthat
the2775DTthe
Appointments2776NNSappointment
Clause2777NNclause
applied2778VVNapply
in2779INin
a2780DTa
situation2781NNsituation
like2782INlike
that2783DTthat
...2784:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2785LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I2786PPI
...2787:...
I2788PPI
...2789:...
[MR. VERRILLI]2790LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...2791:...
certainly2792RBcertainly
,2793,,
we2794PPwe
would2795MDwould
have2796VHhave
heard2797VVNhear
about2798INabout
that2799DTthat
.2800SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2801LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...2802:...
I2803PPI
agree2804VVPagree
with2805INwith
you2806PPyou
...2807:...
I2808PPI
agree2809VVPagree
with2810INwith
you2811PPyou
...2812:...
[MR. VERRILLI]2813LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
And2814CCand
now2815RBnow
we're2816JJwe're
...2817:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2818LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...2819:...
it2820PPit
's2821VBZbe
important2822JJimportant
,2823,,
but2824CCbut
assume2825VVassume
the2826DTthe
history2827NNhistory
is2828VBZbe
still2829RBstill
...2830:...
[MR. VERRILLI]2831LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
But2832CCbut
...2833:...
but2834CCbut
with2835INwith
respect2836NNrespect
...2837:...
the2838DTthe
history2839NNhistory
they2840PPthey
have2841VHPhave
essentially2842RBessentially
is2843VBZbe
that2844IN/thatthat
territorial2845JJterritorial
governors2846NNSgovernor
up2847RBup
until2848INuntil
the2849DTthe
1950s2850NNS1950s
were2851VBDbe
appointed2852VVNappoint
with2853INwith
advice2854NNadvice
and2855CCand
consent2856NNconsent
.2857SENT.
But2858CCbut
...2859:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2860LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And2861CCand
judges2862NNSjudge
.2863SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]2864LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
And2865CCand
territorial2866JJterritorial
judges2867NNSjudge
.2868SENT.
But2869CCbut
I2870PPI
actually2871RBactually
think2872VVPthink
that2873DTthat
...2874:...
let2875VVlet
's2876VBZbe
go2877VVgo
right2878RBright
to2879TOto
the2880DTthe
judges2881NNSjudge
point2882VVPpoint
because2883INbecause
I2884PPI
think2885VVPthink
that2886IN/thatthat
actually2887RBactually
proves2888VVZprove
our2889PP$our
position2890NNposition
and2891CCand
not2892RBnot
theirs2893PPtheirs
,2894,,
because2895INbecause
even2896RBeven
though2897INthough
territorial2898JJterritorial
judges2899NNSjudge
were2900VBDbe
always2901RBalways
nominated2902VVNnominate
by2903INby
the2904DTthe
President2905NPPresident
,2906,,
confirmed2907VVNconfirm
by2908INby
the2909DTthe
Senate2910NPSenate
,2911,,
this2912DTthis
Court2913NPCourt
held2914VVDhold
starting2915VVGstart
in2916INin
Cantor2917NPCantor
and2918CCand
then2919RBthen
also2920RBalso
in2921INin
Englebrecht2922NPEnglebrecht
and2923CCand
McAllister2924NPMcAllister
that2925IN/thatthat
they2926PPthey
were2927VBDbe
n't2928RBn't
judicial2929JJjudicial
officers2930NNSofficer
of2931INof
the2932DTthe
United2933NPUnited
States2934NPSStates
,2935,,
despite2936INdespite
the2937DTthe
fact2938NNfact
that2939IN/thatthat
the2940DTthe
President2941NPPresident
nominated2942VVDnominate
them2943PPthem
and2944CCand
the2945DTthe
Senate2946NPSenate
confirmed2947VVDconfirm
them2948PPthem
.2949SENT.
And2950CCand
then2951RBthen
,2952,,
to2953TOto
reinforce2954VVreinforce
that2955IN/thatthat
,2956,,
there2957EXthere
have2958VHPhave
been2959VBNbe
three2960CDthree
times2961NNStime
in2962INin
the2963DTthe
country2964NNcountry
's2965POS's
history2966NNhistory
where2967WRBwhere
a2968DTa
question2969NNquestion
arose2970VVDarise
about2971RBabout
whether2972INwhether
a2973DTa
territorial2974JJterritorial
judge2975NNjudge
could2976MDcould
be2977VBbe
impeached2978VVNimpeach
by2979INby
Congress2980NPCongress
.2981SENT.
And2982CCand
in2983INin
each2984DTeach
of2985INof
those2986DTthose
three2987CDthree
instances2988NNSinstance
,2989,,
the2990DTthe
political2991JJpolitical
branches2992NNSbranch
concluded2993VVDconclude
that2994IN/thatthat
a2995DTa
territorial2996JJterritorial
judge2997NNjudge
could2998MDcould
not2999RBnot
be3000VBbe
impeached3001VVNimpeach
because3002INbecause
a3003DTa
territorial3004JJterritorial
judge3005NNjudge
was3006VBDbe
not3007RBnot
a3008DTa
civil3009JJcivil
officer3010NNofficer
of3011INof
the3012DTthe
United3013NPUnited
States3014NPSStates
but3015CCbut
only3016RBonly
an3017DTan
officer3018NNofficer
of3019INof
the3020DTthe
territory3021NNterritory
exercising3022VVGexercise
territorial3023JJterritorial
power3024NNpower
.3025SENT.
Now3026RBnow
,3027,,
with3028INwith
respect3029NNrespect
to3030TOto
the3031DTthe
governors3032NNSgovernor
,3033,,
of3034INof
course3035NNcourse
,3036,,
you3037PPyou
know3038VVPknow
,3039,,
the3040DTthe
...3041:...
the3042DTthe
Appointments3043NNSappointment
Clause3044NNclause
is3045VBZbe
not3046RBnot
an3047DTan
either3048RBeither
/3049SYM/
or3050CCor
proposition3051NNproposition
.3052SENT.
If3053INif
it3054PPit
applies3055VVZapply
to3056TOto
the3057DTthe
governors3058NNSgovernor
as3059INas
principal3060JJprincipal
officers3061NNSofficer
,3062,,
it3063PPit
applies3064VVZapply
to3065TOto
the3066DTthe
people3067NNSpeople
the3068DTthe
governor3069NNgovernor
appoints3070VVZappoint
as3071INas
inferior3072JJinferior
officers3073NNSofficer
.3074SENT.
But3075CCbut
starting3076VVGstart
with3077INwith
the3078DTthe
Northwest3079NPNorthwest
Ordinance3080NPOrdinance
and3081CCand
continuing3082VVGcontinue
throughout3083INthroughout
the3084DTthe
country3085NNcountry
's3086POS's
history3087NNhistory
,3088,,
inferior3089JJinferior
officers3090NNSofficer
have3091VHPhave
been3092VBNbe
appointed3093VVNappoint
in3094INin
manners3095NNSmanner
that3096WDTthat
do3097VVPdo
n't3098RBn't
comply3099VVcomply
with3100INwith
the3101DTthe
Appointments3102NNSappointment
Clause3103NNclause
.3104SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3105LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Does3106VVZdo
it3107PPit
just3108RBjust
...3109:...
does3110VVZdo
it3111PPit
strike3112VVstrike
you3113PPyou
as3114INas
a3115DTa
little3116RBlittle
strange3117JJstrange
,3118,,
Mr3119NPMr
.3120SENT.
Verrilli3121NPVerrilli
,3122,,
to3123TOto
use3124VVuse
the3125DTthe
history3126NNhistory
in3127INin
this3128DTthis
kind3129NNkind
of3130INof
case3131NNcase
so3132RBso
extensively3133RBextensively
?3134SENT?
I3135PPI
mean3136VVPmean
,3137,,
first3138RBfirst
,3139,,
it3140PPit
's3141VBZbe
a3142DTa
little3143JJlittle
bit3144NNbit
all3145RBall
over3146INover
the3147DTthe
map3148NNmap
and3149CCand
you3150PPyou
each3151DTeach
have3152VHPhave
your3153PP$your
historical3154JJhistorical
examples3155NNSexample
to3156TOto
point3157VVpoint
to3158TOto
.3159SENT.
But3160CCbut
,3161,,
second3162RBsecond
,3163,,
the3164DTthe
position3165NNposition
of3166INof
territories3167NNSterritory
currently3168RBcurrently
is3169VBZbe
so3170RBso
different3171JJdifferent
from3172INfrom
the3173DTthe
position3174NNposition
of3175INof
territories3176NNSterritory
throughout3177INthroughout
much3178JJmuch
or3179CCor
most3180JJSmost
of3181INof
our3182PP$our
history3183NNhistory
.3184SENT.
So3185INso
I3186PPI
...3187:...
I3188PPI
guess3189VVPguess
it3190PPit
seems3191VVZseem
to3192TOto
me3193PPme
more3194RBRmore
natural3195JJnatural
,3196,,
rather3197RBrather
than3198INthan
to3199TOto
look3200VVlook
to3201TOto
,3202,,
you3203PPyou
know3204VVPknow
,3205,,
what3206WPwhat
the3207DTthe
Northwest3208NPNorthwest
Ordinance3209NPOrdinance
did3210VVDdo
,3211,,
is3212VBZbe
...3213:...
is3214VBZbe
simply3215RBsimply
to3216TOto
use3217VVuse
a3218DTa
kind3219NNkind
of3220INof
functional3221JJfunctional
test3222NNtest
and3223CCand
say3224VVPsay
are3225VBPbe
these3226DTthese
people3227NNSpeople
doing3228VVGdo
the3229DTthe
sorts3230NNSsort
of3231INof
things3232NNSthing
that3233WDTthat
would3234MDwould
be3235VBbe
done3236VVNdo
by3237INby
state3238NNstate
officials3239NNSofficial
in3240INin
states3241NNSstate
,3242,,
or3243CCor
are3244VBPbe
they3245PPthey
doing3246VVGdo
the3247DTthe
sorts3248NNSsort
of3249INof
things3250NNSthing
that3251WDTthat
would3252MDwould
be3253VBbe
done3254VVNdo
by3255INby
federal3256JJfederal
officials3257NNSofficial
?3258SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]3259LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
So3260INso
two3261CDtwo
things3262NNSthing
.3263SENT.
First3264RBfirst
,3265,,
respectfully3266RBrespectfully
,3267,,
we3268PPwe
think3269VVPthink
,3270,,
in3271INin
interpreting3272VVGinterpret
the3273DTthe
meaning3274NNmeaning
of3275INof
the3276DTthe
phrase3277NNphrase
"3278''"
officer3279NNofficer
of3280INof
the3281DTthe
United3282NPUnited
States3283NPSStates
,3284,,
"3285''"
which3286WDTwhich
is3287VBZbe
the3288DTthe
job3289NNjob
that3290WDTthat
has3291VHZhave
to3292TOto
be3293VBbe
done3294VVNdo
in3295INin
this3296DTthis
case3297NNcase
,3298,,
the3299DTthe
history3300NNhistory
is3301VBZbe
very3302RBvery
,3303,,
very3304RBvery
relevant3305JJrelevant
.3306SENT.
But3307CCbut
,3308,,
second3309RBsecond
,3310,,
even3311RBeven
if3312INif
one3313PPone
takes3314VVZtake
a3315DTa
functional3316JJfunctional
analysis3317NNanalysis
,3318,,
I3319PPI
think3320VVPthink
the3321DTthe
right3322JJright
way3323NNway
to3324TOto
look3325VVlook
at3326INat
the3327DTthe
functional3328JJfunctional
analysis3329NNanalysis
is3330VBZbe
to3331TOto
look3332VVlook
at3333INat
the3334DTthe
...3335:...
what3336WPwhat
the3337DTthe
Board3338NPBoard
is3339VBZbe
actually3340RBactually
charged3341VVNcharge
with3342INwith
doing3343VVGdo
.3344SENT.
And3345CCand
what3346WPwhat
the3347DTthe
Board3348NPBoard
is3349VBZbe
actually3350RBactually
charged3351VVNcharge
with3352INwith
doing3353VVGdo
is3354VBZbe
acting3355VVGact
in3356INin
the3357DTthe
shoes3358NNSshoe
of3359INof
the3360DTthe
government3361NNgovernment
of3362INof
Puerto3363NPPuerto
Rico3364NPRico
in3365INin
the3366DTthe
restructuring3367NNrestructuring
proceedings3368NNSproceeding
and3369CCand
acting3370VVGact
as3371INas
an3372DTan
independent3373JJindependent
entity3374NNentity
insulated3375VVNinsulate
from3376INfrom
political3377JJpolitical
pressure3378NNpressure
within3379INwithin
the3380DTthe
budgeting3381NNbudgeting
proceedings3382NNSproceeding
,3383,,
but3384CCbut
...3385:...
but3386CCbut
constrained3387VVNconstrain
by3388INby
statute3389NNstatute
to3390TOto
act3391VVact
on3392INon
behalf3393NNbehalf
of3394INof
,3395,,
in3396INin
the3397DTthe
interests3398NNSinterest
of3399INof
,3400,,
for3401INfor
the3402DTthe
territory3403NNterritory
.3404SENT.
So3405RBso
...3406:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3407LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well3408UHWell
...3409:...
[MR. VERRILLI]3410LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...3411:...
if3412INif
you3413PPyou
're3414VBPbe
going3415VVGgo
to3416TOto
use3417VVuse
a3418DTa
functional3419JJfunctional
approach3420NNapproach
,3421,,
they3422PPthey
're3423VBPbe
very3424RBvery
much3425JJmuch
like3426INlike
a3427DTa
state3428NNstate
government3429NNgovernment
,3430,,
not3431RBnot
a3432DTa
federal3433JJfederal
overlord3434NNoverlord
.3435SENT.
And3436CCand
I3437PPI
think3438VVPthink
this3439DTthis
would3440MDwould
actually3441RBactually
be3442VBbe
kind3443NNkind
of3444INof
a3445DTa
crazy3446JJcrazy
system3447NNsystem
if3448INif
what3449WPwhat
you3450PPyou
wanted3451VVDwant
to3452TOto
do3453VVdo
was3454VBDbe
create3455VVcreate
a3456DTa
federal3457JJfederal
overlord3458NNoverlord
to3459TOto
say3460VVsay
:3461::
You3462PPyou
're3463VBPbe
a3464DTa
federal3465JJfederal
overlord3466NNoverlord
.3467SENT.
Take3468VVtake
the3469DTthe
national3470JJnational
interests3471NNSinterest
into3472INinto
account3473NNaccount
,3474,,
but3475CCbut
,3476,,
when3477WRBwhen
you3478PPyou
actually3479RBactually
administer3480VVadminister
the3481DTthe
...3482:...
the3483DTthe
authority3484NNauthority
you3485PPyou
have3486VHPhave
,3487,,
you3488PPyou
have3489VHPhave
to3490TOto
only3491RBonly
focus3492VVfocus
...3493:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3494LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
What3495WPWhat
do3496VVPdo
we3497PPwe
do3498VVPdo
about3499INabout
the3500DTthe
brief3501NNbrief
...3502:...
[MR. VERRILLI]3503LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...3504:...
on3505INon
territorial3506JJterritorial
interests3507NNSinterest
.3508SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3509LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...3510:...
what3511WPwhat
do3512VVPdo
we3513PPwe
do3514VVPdo
about3515INabout
the3516DTthe
brief3517NNbrief
of3518INof
at3519INat
least3520JJSleast
there3521EXthere
's3522VBZbe
one3523CDone
amicus3524NNamicus
that3525WDTthat
suggests3526VVZsuggest
that3527IN/thatthat
in3528INin
one3529CDone
of3530INof
the3531DTthe
litigations3532NNSlitigation
that3533WDTthat
's3534VBZbe
ongoing3535JJongoing
,3536,,
with3537INwith
respect3538NNrespect
to3539TOto
PROMESA3540NPPROMESA
,3541,,
that3542IN/thatthat
there3543EXthere
's3544VBZbe
all3545DTall
sorts3546NNSsort
of3547INof
evidence3548NNevidence
that3549IN/thatthat
the3550DTthe
Board3551NPBoard
is3552VBZbe
taking3553VVGtake
directives3554NNSdirective
from3555INfrom
federal3556JJfederal
officials3557NNSofficial
?3558SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]3559LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
So3560INso
I3561PPI
...3562:...
you3563PPyou
know3564VVPknow
,3565,,
that3566DTthat
brief3567NNbrief
,3568,,
you3569PPyou
know3570VVPknow
,3571,,
respectfully3572RBrespectfully
,3573,,
Your3574PP$your
Honor3575NPHonor
,3576,,
I3577PPI
...3578:...
I3579PPI
think3580VVPthink
that3581WDTthat
shows3582VVZshow
the3583DTthe
perils3584NNSperil
of3585INof
relying3586VVGrely
on3587INon
an3588DTan
amicus3589NNamicus
brief3590NNbrief
that3591WDTthat
relies3592VVZrely
on3593INon
extra-record3594NNextra-record
information3595NNinformation
.3596SENT.
The3597DTthe
vast3598JJvast
majority3599NNmajority
of3600INof
those3601DTthose
...3602:...
of3603INof
the3604DTthe
...3605:...
the3606DTthe
documents3607NNSdocument
there3608RBthere
have3609VHPhave
not3610RBnot
been3611VBNbe
disclosed3612VVNdisclose
.3613SENT.
But3614CCbut
,3615,,
if3616INif
I3617PPI
may3618MDmay
talk3619VVtalk
about3620INabout
them3621PPthem
,3622,,
because3623INbecause
I3624PPI
've3625VHPhave
been3626VBNbe
asked3627VVNask
about3628INabout
them3629PPthem
,3630,,
the3631DTthe
...3632:...
the3633DTthe
...3634:...
the3635DTthe
vast3636JJvast
majority3637NNmajority
of3638INof
those3639DTthose
are3640VBPbe
communications3641NNScommunication
from3642INfrom
federal3643JJfederal
government3644NNgovernment
officials3645NNSofficial
to3646TOto
the3647DTthe
Board3648NPBoard
in3649INin
the3650DTthe
wake3651NNwake
of3652INof
the3653DTthe
disasters3654NNSdisaster
and3655CCand
the3656DTthe
hurricanes3657NNShurricane
saying3658VVGsay
we3659PPwe
need3660VVPneed
information3661NNinformation
about3662INabout
what3663WPwhat
's3664VBZbe
going3665VVGgo
on3666INon
on3667INon
the3668DTthe
ground3669NNground
here3670RBhere
.3671SENT.
And3672CCand
so3673RBso
it3674PPit
was3675VBDbe
...3676:...
it3677PPit
was3678VBDbe
informational3679JJinformational
,3680,,
the3681DTthe
overwhelming3682JJoverwhelming
majority3683NNmajority
of3684INof
them3685PPthem
.3686SENT.
Now3687RBnow
they3688PPthey
did3689VVDdo
find3690VVfind
one3691CDone
communication3692NNcommunication
from3693INfrom
a3694DTa
Senate3695NPSenate
staffer3696NNstaffer
,3697,,
I3698PPI
think3699VVPthink
,3700,,
or3701CCor
a3702DTa
House3703NPHouse
staffer3704NNstaffer
,3705,,
I3706PPI
think3707VVPthink
a3708DTa
Senate3709NPSenate
staffer3710NNstaffer
,3711,,
saying3712VVGsay
we3713PPwe
want3714VVPwant
you3715PPyou
to3716TOto
resolve3717VVresolve
Issue3718NPIssue
X3719NPX
this3720DTthis
way3721NNway
.3722SENT.
Again3723RBagain
,3724,,
I3725PPI
've3726VHPhave
got3727VVNget
to3728TOto
be3729VBbe
outside3730INoutside
the3731DTthe
record3732NNrecord
to3733TOto
...3734:...
to3735TOto
answer3736VVanswer
that3737DTthat
.3738SENT.
But3739CCbut
,3740,,
basically3741RBbasically
,3742,,
the3743DTthe
Board3744NPBoard
told3745VVDtell
them3746PPthem
to3747TOto
pound3748NNpound
sand3749NNsand
.3750SENT.
And3751CCand
so3752RBso
I3753PPI
do3754VVPdo
n't3755RBn't
think3756VVthink
there3757EXthere
's3758VBZbe
any3759DTany
merit3760NNmerit
to3761TOto
it3762PPit
whatsoever3763RBwhatsoever
.3764SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3765LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank3766VVthank
you3767PPyou
,3768,,
counsel3769NNcounsel
.3770SENT.
General3771NPGeneral
Wall3772NPWall
.3773SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]3774LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Mr3775NPMr
.3776SENT.
Chief3777NPChief
Justice3778NPJustice
,3779,,
and3780CCand
may3781MDmay
it3782PPit
please3783VVplease
the3784DTthe
Court3785NPCourt
:3786::
We3787PPwe
know3788VVPknow
that3789IN/thatthat
Congress3790NPCongress
expressly3791RBexpressly
invoked3792VVDinvoke
its3793PP$its
authority3794NNauthority
over3795INover
the3796DTthe
territories3797NNSterritory
and3798CCand
placed3799VVDplace
the3800DTthe
Board3801NPBoard
within3802INwithin
the3803DTthe
Puerto3804NPPuerto
Rican3805JJRican
government3806NNgovernment
.3807SENT.
So3808INso
the3809DTthe
real3810JJreal
question3811NNquestion
here3812RBhere
is3813VBZbe
,3814,,
was3815VBDbe
that3816DTthat
choice3817NNchoice
constitutional3818JJconstitutional
under3819INunder
Article3820NPArticle
IV3821NPIV
?3822SENT?
It3823PPit
was3824VBDbe
.3825SENT.
The3826DTthe
Board3827NPBoard
budgets3828NNSbudget
and3829CCand
restructures3830VVZrestructure
debt3831NNdebt
only3832RBonly
for3833INfor
Puerto3834NPPuerto
Rico3835NPRico
.3836SENT.
It3837PPit
acts3838VVZact
in3839INin
the3840DTthe
territory3841NNterritory
under3842INunder
a3843DTa
territory-specific3844JJterritory-specific
statute3845NNstatute
.3846SENT.
In3847INin
our3848PP$our
view3849NNview
,3850,,
Mr3851NPMr
.3852SENT.
Chief3853NPChief
Justice3854NPJustice
,3855,,
the3856DTthe
Board3857NPBoard
's3858POS's
focus3859NNfocus
is3860VBZbe
exclusively3861RBexclusively
local3862JJlocal
,3863,,
but3864CCbut
,3865,,
at3866INat
a3867DTa
minimum3868NNminimum
,3869,,
it3870PPit
's3871VBZbe
primarily3872RBprimarily
local3873JJlocal
,3874,,
which3875WDTwhich
is3876VBZbe
the3877DTthe
appropriate3878JJappropriate
test3879NNtest
under3880INunder
Palmore3881NPPalmore
.3882SENT.
Justice3883NPJustice
Kagan3884NPKagan
,3885,,
Congress3886NPCongress
could3887MDcould
have3888VHhave
legislated3889VVNlegislate
directly3890RBdirectly
.3891SENT.
It3892PPit
could3893MDcould
have3894VHhave
put3895VVNput
this3896DTthis
in3897INin
the3898DTthe
Treasury3899NPTreasury
Department3900NPDepartment
.3901SENT.
If3902INif
it3903PPit
had3904VHDhave
n't3905RBn't
otherwise3906RBotherwise
specified3907VVNspecify
,3908,,
the3909DTthe
powers3910NNSpower
would3911MDwould
have3912VHhave
gone3913VVNgo
to3914TOto
the3915DTthe
assembly3916NNassembly
and3917CCand
the3918DTthe
governor3919NNgovernor
with3920INwith
respect3921NNrespect
to3922TOto
restructuring3923VVGrestructure
the3924DTthe
debt3925NNdebt
and3926CCand
representing3927VVGrepresent
the3928DTthe
Commonwealth3929NNcommonwealth
in3930INin
these3931DTthese
Title3932NPTitle
III3933NPIII
proceedings3934NNSproceeding
.3935SENT.
It3936PPit
did3937VVDdo
n't3938RBn't
want3939VVwant
that3940DTthat
.3941SENT.
It3942PPit
wanted3943VVDwant
new3944JJnew
and3945CCand
independent3946JJindependent
territorial3947JJterritorial
officers3948NNSofficer
on3949INon
the3950DTthe
ground3951NNground
in3952INin
Puerto3953NPPuerto
Rico3954NPRico
to3955TOto
resolve3956VVresolve
the3957DTthe
fiscal3958JJfiscal
crisis3959NNcrisis
as3960INas
it3961PPit
had3962VHDhave
with3963INwith
the3964DTthe
D3965NPD
.3966SENT.
C3967LSc
.3968SENT.
Control3969NPControl
Board3970NPBoard
203971CD@card@
years3972NNSyear
earlier3973RBRearlier
.3974SENT.
That3975DTthat
's3976VBZbe
a3977DTa
re3978NNre
...3979:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]3980LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
And3981CCand
what3982WPwhat
was3983VBDbe
the3984DTthe
position3985NNposition
the3986DTthe
government3987NNgovernment
took3988VVDtake
,3989,,
the3990DTthe
D3991NPD
.3992SENT.
C3993LSc
.3994SENT.
Control3995NPControl
Board3996NPBoard
?3997SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]3998LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So3999INso
they4000PPthey
point4001VVPpoint
to4002TOto
a4003DTa
D4004NPD
.4005SENT.
C4006LSc
.4007SENT.
Circuit4008NNcircuit
brief4009NNbrief
in4010INin
the4011DTthe
second4012JJsecond
set4013NNset
of4014INof
proceedings4015NNSproceeding
.4016SENT.
We4017PPwe
said4018VVDsay
in4019INin
that4020DTthat
brief4021NNbrief
,4022,,
after4023INafter
this4024DTthis
Court4025NPCourt
had4026VHDhave
held4027VVNhold
it4028PPit
's4029VBZbe
exercising4030VVGexercise
federal4031JJfederal
power4032NNpower
with4033INwith
respect4034NNrespect
to4035TOto
federal4036JJfederal
property4037NNproperty
,4038,,
we4039PPwe
said4040VVDsay
,4041,,
sure4042RBsure
,4043,,
it4044PPit
's4045VBZbe
federal4046JJfederal
,4047,,
but4048CCbut
I4049PPI
...4050:...
I4051PPI
'd4052MDwould
urge4053VVurge
the4054DTthe
Court4055NPCourt
to4056TOto
look4057VVlook
at4058INat
the4059DTthe
brief4060NNbrief
.4061SENT.
We4062PPwe
said4063VVDsay
if4064INif
it4065PPit
had4066VHDhave
been4067VBNbe
acting4068VVGact
with4069INwith
respect4070NNrespect
to4071TOto
D4072NPD
.4073SENT.
C4074LSc
.4075SENT.
,4076,,
it4077PPit
would4078MDwould
have4079VHhave
been4080VBNbe
different4081JJdifferent
because4082INbecause
that4083WDTthat
would4084MDwould
have4085VHhave
been4086VBNbe
local4087JJlocal
power4088NNpower
.4089SENT.
I4090PPI
think4091VVPthink
the4092DTthe
same4093JJsame
is4094VBZbe
true4095JJtrue
with4096INwith
respect4097NNrespect
to4098TOto
the4099DTthe
territories4100NNSterritory
.4101SENT.
We4102PPwe
drew4103VVDdraw
a4104DTa
distinction4105NNdistinction
in4106INin
that4107DTthat
very4108RBvery
brief4109JJbrief
between4110INbetween
federal4111JJfederal
power4112NNpower
over4113INover
federal4114JJfederal
property4115NNproperty
and4116CCand
local4117JJlocal
power4118NNpower
with4119INwith
respect4120NNrespect
to4121TOto
the4122DTthe
District4123NPDistrict
or4124CCor
,4125,,
here4126RBhere
,4127,,
the4128DTthe
territories4129NNSterritory
.4130SENT.
So4131RBso
I4132PPI
think4133VVPthink
our4134PP$our
position4135NNposition
has4136VHZhave
been4137VBNbe
entirely4138RBentirely
consistent4139JJconsistent
.4140SENT.
As4141RBas
early4142RBearly
as4143RBas
...4144:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]4145LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I4146PPI
do4147VVPdo
n't4148RBn't
see4149VVsee
how4150WRBhow
.4151SENT.
I4152PPI
mean4153VVPmean
,4154,,
you4155PPyou
say4156VVPsay
federal4157JJfederal
power4158NNpower
over4159INover
federal4160JJfederal
property4161NNproperty
.4162SENT.
But4163CCbut
that4164DTthat
's4165VBZbe
what4166WPwhat
the4167DTthe
Territory4168NPTerritory
Clause4169NPClause
,4170,,
read4171VVDread
your4172PP$your
way4173NNway
,4174,,
would4175MDwould
say4176VVsay
,4177,,
that4178IN/thatthat
Puerto4179NPPuerto
Rico4180NPRico
is4181VBZbe
federal4182JJfederal
property4183NNproperty
.4184SENT.
You4185PPyou
can4186MDcan
't4187RB't
have4188VHhave
it4189PPit
both4190DTboth
ways4191NNSway
.4192SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]4193LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So4194INso
I4195PPI
...4196:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]4197LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Your4198PP$your
...4199:...
you4200PPyou
have4201VHPhave
to4202TOto
be4203VBbe
disposing4204VVGdispose
of4205INof
federal4206JJfederal
control4207NNcontrol
over4208INover
federal4209JJfederal
property4210NNproperty
,4211,,
because4212INbecause
that4213WDTthat
's4214VBZbe
what4215WPwhat
a4216DTa
territory4217NNterritory
is4218VBZbe
.4219SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]4220LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So4221INso
I4222PPI
...4223:...
I4224PPI
do4225VVPdo
n't4226RBn't
think4227VVthink
so4228RBso
,4229,,
Justice4230NPJustice
Sotomayor4231NPSotomayor
,4232,,
but4233CCbut
I4234PPI
do4235VVPdo
n't4236RBn't
know4237VVknow
that4238WDTthat
much4239RBmuch
turns4240VVZturn
on4241RPon
that4242IN/thatthat
here4243RBhere
.4244SENT.
Article4245NPArticle
IV4246NPIV
says4247VVZsay
both4248DTboth
property4249NNproperty
and4250CCand
the4251DTthe
territory4252NNterritory
.4253SENT.
And4254CCand
this4255DTthis
Court4256NPCourt
's4257POS's
cases4258NNScase
have4259VHPhave
treated4260VVNtreat
them4261PPthem
differently4262RBdifferently
.4263SENT.
So4264RBso
there4265RBthere
it4266PPit
was4267VBDbe
Dulles4268NPDulles
and4269CCand
Reagan4270NPReagan
National4271NPNational
airports4272NNSairport
.4273SENT.
Those4274DTthose
have4275VHPhave
a4276DTa
different4277JJdifferent
status4278NNstatus
under4279INunder
the4280DTthe
Constitution4281NPConstitution
from4282INfrom
the4283DTthe
territories4284NNSterritory
.4285SENT.
But4286CCbut
I4287PPI
think4288VVPthink
my4289PP$my
point4290NNpoint
was4291VBDbe
just4292RBjust
that4293IN/thatthat
where4294WRBwhere
Congress4295NPCongress
is4296VBZbe
acting4297VVGact
with4298INwith
respect4299NNrespect
to4300TOto
something4301NNsomething
federal4302JJfederal
,4303,,
it4304PPit
's4305VBZbe
exercising4306VVGexercise
national4307JJnational
legislative4308JJlegislative
power4309NNpower
and4310CCand
it4311PPit
's4312VBZbe
creating4313VVGcreate
national4314JJnational
executive4315JJexecutive
offices4316NNSoffice
.4317SENT.
That4318DTthat
's4319VBZbe
not4320RBnot
what4321WPwhat
it4322PPit
's4323VBZbe
doing4324VVGdo
here4325RBhere
.4326SENT.
It4327PPit
put4328VVDput
a4329DTa
Board4330NPBoard
inside4331INinside
the4332DTthe
Puerto4333NPPuerto
Rican4334JJRican
government4335NNgovernment
.4336SENT.
Now4337RBnow
,4338,,
yes4339UHyes
,4340,,
it4341PPit
wanted4342VVDwant
it4343PPit
independent4344JJindependent
from4345INfrom
other4346JJother
Puerto4347NPPuerto
Rican4348NPRican
actors4349NNSactor
that4350IN/thatthat
it4351PPit
thought4352VVDthink
had4353VHDhave
played4354VVNplay
a4355DTa
role4356NNrole
in4357INin
this4358DTthis
debt4359NNdebt
crisis4360NNcrisis
.4361SENT.
But4362CCbut
that4363DTthat
's4364VBZbe
a4365DTa
very4366RBvery
different4367JJdifferent
thing4368NNthing
from4369INfrom
putting4370VVGput
it4371PPit
in4372INin
the4373DTthe
federal4374JJfederal
government4375NNgovernment
and4376CCand
exercising4377VVGexercise
federal4378JJfederal
power4379NNpower
.4380SENT.
It4381PPit
was4382VBDbe
reorganizing4383VVGreorganize
the4384DTthe
Puerto4385NPPuerto
Rican4386JJRican
government4387NNgovernment
.4388SENT.
That4389DTthat
is4390VBZbe
a4391DTa
quintessential4392JJquintessential
exercise4393NNexercise
of4394INof
Article4395NPArticle
IV4396NPIV
power4397NNpower
.4398SENT.
And4399CCand
I4400PPI
do4401VVPdo
n't4402RBn't
think4403VVthink
,4404,,
by4405INby
the4406DTthe
way4407NNway
,4408,,
Justice4409NPJustice
Kagan4410NPKagan
and4411CCand
Kavanaugh4412NPKavanaugh
,4413,,
that4414IN/thatthat
the4415DTthe
history4416NNhistory
is4417VBZbe
a4418DTa
wash4419NNwash
.4420SENT.
It4421PPit
's4422VBZbe
not4423RBnot
just4424RBjust
the4425DTthe
early4426JJearly
Washington4427NPWashington
mayors4428NNSmayor
.4429SENT.
Territorial4430JJterritorial
judges4431NNSjudge
were4432VBDbe
federally4433RBfederally
appointed4434VVNappoint
,4435,,
never4436RBnever
treated4437VVNtreat
as4438INas
federal4439JJfederal
officers4440NNSofficer
.4441SENT.
Early4442JJearly
territorial4443JJterritorial
upper4444JJupper
houses4445NNShouse
,4446,,
the4447DTthe
...4448:...
the4449DTthe
D4450NPD
.4451SENT.
C4452LSc
.4453SENT.
Control4454NPControl
Board4455NPBoard
.4456SENT.
D4457LSd
.4458SENT.
C4459LSc
.4460SENT.
judges4461NNSjudge
,4462,,
to4463TOto
this4464DTthis
day4465NNday
,4466,,
are4467VBPbe
appointed4468VVNappoint
by4469INby
the4470DTthe
President4471NPPresident
and4472CCand
confirmed4473VVDconfirm
by4474INby
the4475DTthe
Senate4476NPSenate
.4477SENT.
They4478PPthey
've4479VHPhave
never4480RBnever
been4481VBNbe
treated4482VVNtreat
as4483INas
federal4484JJfederal
officers4485NNSofficer
.4486SENT.
They4487PPthey
do4488VVPdo
not4489RBnot
have4490VHhave
lifetime4491NNlifetime
tenure4492NNtenure
and4493CCand
a4494DTa
guaranteed4495VVNguarantee
salary4496NNsalary
.4497SENT.
Federal4498JJFederal
appointment4499NNappointment
has4500VHZhave
never4501RBnever
been4502VBNbe
the4503DTthe
hallmark4504NNhallmark
of4505INof
whether4506INwhether
you4507PPyou
are4508VBPbe
federal4509JJfederal
or4510CCor
territorial4511JJterritorial
.4512SENT.
The4513DTthe
hallmark4514NNhallmark
has4515VHZhave
always4516RBalways
been4517VBNbe
,4518,,
as4519INas
Mr4520NPMr
.4521SENT.
Verrilli4522NPVerrilli
said4523VVDsay
,4524,,
what4525WPwhat
kind4526NNkind
of4527INof
power4528NNpower
are4529VBPbe
you4530PPyou
exercising4531VVGexercise
?4532SENT?
[JUSTICE BREYER]4533LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Well4534UHWell
,4535,,
that4536WDTthat
's4537VBZbe
a4538DTa
question4539NNquestion
I4540PPI
...4541:...
I4542PPI
mean4543VVPmean
,4544,,
you4545PPyou
're4546VBPbe
representing4547VVGrepresent
the4548DTthe
federal4549JJfederal
government4550NNgovernment
.4551SENT.
If4552INif
you4553PPyou
lost4554VVDlose
,4555,,
would4556MDwould
they4557PPthey
appoint4558VVappoint
the4559DTthe
same4560JJsame
people4561NNSpeople
?4562SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]4563LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
The4564NPThe
President4565NPPresident
has4566VHZhave
nominated4567VVNnominate
the4568DTthe
same4569JJsame
people4570NNSpeople
.4571SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]4572LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Okay4573NPOkay
.4574SENT.
Now4575RBnow
,4576,,
if4577INif
that4578WDTthat
's4579VBZbe
so4580RBso
and4581CCand
if4582INif
you4583PPyou
lose4584VVPlose
,4585,,
but4586CCbut
if4587INif
we4588PPwe
were4589VBDbe
to4590TOto
follow4591VVfollow
Judge4592NPJudge
Terrea4593NPTerrea
and4594CCand
say4595VVsay
the4596DTthe
de4597FWde
facto4598FWfacto
officer4599NNofficer
doctrine4600NNdoctrine
,4601,,
what4602WPwhat
difference4603NNdifference
would4604MDwould
it4605PPit
make4606VVmake
?4607SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]4608LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So4609INso
there4610EXthere
are4611VBPbe
two4612CDtwo
separate4613JJseparate
things4614NNSthing
with4615INwith
respect4616NNrespect
to4617TOto
the4618DTthe
...4619:...
to4620TOto
the4621DTthe
remedy4622NNremedy
,4623,,
Justice4624NPJustice
Breyer4625NPBreyer
.4626SENT.
If4627INif
the4628DTthe
Court4629NPCourt
agrees4630VVZagree
with4631INwith
us4632PPus
on4633INon
the4634DTthe
de4635FWde
facto4636FWfacto
officer4637NNofficer
doctrine4638NNdoctrine
,4639,,
that4640WDTthat
takes4641VVZtake
care4642NNcare
of4643INof
the4644DTthe
Board4645NPBoard
's4646POS's
acts4647NNSact
running4648VVGrun
up4649RPup
through4650INthrough
the4651DTthe
Court4652NPCourt
's4653POS's
decision4654NNdecision
.4655SENT.
Going4656VVGgo
forward4657RBforward
,4658,,
I4659PPI
think4660VVPthink
all4661PDTall
the4662DTthe
parties4663NNSparty
now4664RBnow
agree4665VVPagree
we4666PPwe
still4667RBstill
need4668VVPneed
a4669DTa
stay4670NNstay
of4671INof
the4672DTthe
mandate4673NNmandate
because4674INbecause
you4675PPyou
'd4676MDwould
have4677VHhave
to4678TOto
give4679VVgive
Congress4680NPCongress
the4681DTthe
opportunity4682NNopportunity
to4683TOto
confirm4684VVconfirm
a4685DTa
new4686JJnew
Board4687NPBoard
.4688SENT.
Otherwise4689RBotherwise
,4690,,
the4691DTthe
Board4692NPBoard
would4693MDwould
shut4694VVshut
down4695RPdown
over4696INover
night4697NNnight
.4698SENT.
You4699PPyou
would4700MDwould
n't4701RBn't
have4702VHhave
a4703DTa
Board4704NPBoard
.4705SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]4706LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah4707NPYeah
.4708SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]4709LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So4710INso
you4711PPyou
've4712VHPhave
got4713VVNget
to4714TOto
give4715VVgive
the4716DTthe
Senate4717NPSenate
time4718NNtime
to4719TOto
act4720VVact
.4721SENT.
Right4722RBright
?4723SENT?
And4724CCand
then4725RBthen
that4726IN/thatthat
new4727JJnew
Board4728NPBoard
would4729MDwould
pick4730VVpick
up4731RPup
where4732WRBwhere
the4733DTthe
old4734JJold
Board4735NPBoard
left4736VVDleave
off4737RPoff
.4738SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]4739LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But4740CCbut
they4741PPthey
would4742MDwould
be4743VBbe
the4744DTthe
same4745JJsame
people4746NNSpeople
.4747SENT.
And4748CCand
so4749INso
what4750WPwhat
you4751PPyou
're4752VBPbe
talking4753VVGtalk
about4754RBabout
is4755VBZbe
a4756DTa
delay4757NNdelay
of4758INof
possibly4759RBpossibly
days4760NNSday
while4761INwhile
the4762DTthe
Senate4763NPSenate
gets4764VVZget
its4765PP$its
act4766NNact
together4767RBtogether
to4768TOto
confirm4769VVconfirm
the4770DTthe
people4771NNSpeople
that4772IN/thatthat
they4773PPthey
already4774RBalready
recommended4775VVDrecommend
to4776TOto
the4777DTthe
President4778NPPresident
with4779INwith
one4780CDone
exception4781NNexception
.4782SENT.
I4783PPI
mean4784VVPmean
,4785,,
are4786VBPbe
we4787PPwe
talking4788VVGtalk
...4789:...
is4790VBZbe
that4791IN/thatthat
what4792WPwhat
we4793PPwe
're4794VBPbe
talking4795VVGtalk
about4796RBabout
?4797SENT?
You4798PPyou
win4799VVPwin
,4800,,
and4801CCand
there4802EXthere
's4803VBZbe
no4804DTno
delay4805NNdelay
;4806:;
you4807PPyou
lose4808VVPlose
,4809,,
assuming4810VVGassume
Judge4811NPJudge
Terrea4812NPTerrea
's4813POS's
right4814NNright
,4815,,
and4816CCand
there4817EXthere
's4818VBZbe
a4819DTa
slight4820JJslight
delay4821NNdelay
?4822SENT?
That4823DTthat
's4824VBZbe
what4825WPwhat
this4826DTthis
case4827NNcase
is4828VBZbe
about4829RBabout
?4830SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]4831LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Well4832UHWell
,4833,,
I4834PPI
...4835:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]4836LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
On4837INon
that4838DTthat
assumption4839NNassumption
?4840SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]4841LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
I4842PPI
hope4843VVPhope
we4844PPwe
're4845VBPbe
not4846RBnot
in4847INin
a4848DTa
world4849NNworld
where4850WRBwhere
we4851PPwe
lose4852VVPlose
,4853,,
and4854CCand
I4855PPI
would4856MDwould
love4857VVlove
to4858TOto
tell4859VVtell
you4860PPyou
that4861IN/thatthat
it4862PPit
won4863MDwill
't4864RB't
be4865VBbe
a4866DTa
big4867JJbig
deal4868NNdeal
in4869INin
that4870DTthat
world4871NNworld
,4872,,
but4873CCbut
it4874PPit
's4875VBZbe
going4876VVGgo
to4877TOto
be4878VBbe
a4879DTa
little4880RBlittle
more4881RBRmore
complicated4882VVNcomplicate
that4883RBthat
.4884SENT.
They4885PPthey
're4886VBPbe
almost4887RBalmost
certain4888JJcertain
to4889TOto
argue4890VVargue
that4891IN/thatthat
the4892DTthe
nominations4893NNSnomination
have4894VHPhave
expired4895VVNexpire
and4896CCand
that4897IN/thatthat
even4898RBeven
though4899INthough
the4900DTthe
Senate4901NPSenate
has4902VHZhave
confirmed4903VVNconfirm
people4904NNSpeople
before4905INbefore
to4906TOto
expired4907JJexpired
terms4908NNSterm
,4909,,
it4910PPit
can4911MDcan
't4912RB't
do4913VVPdo
that4914IN/thatthat
here4915RBhere
.4916SENT.
Even4917RBeven
if4918INif
we4919PPwe
win4920VVPwin
that4921IN/thatthat
argument4922NNargument
and4923CCand
even4924RBeven
if4925INif
the4926DTthe
Senate4927NPSenate
committee4928NNcommittee
reports4929VVZreport
them4930PPthem
out4931RPout
and4932CCand
even4933RBeven
if4934INif
the4935DTthe
Senate4936NPSenate
gets4937VVZget
them4938PPthem
through4939INthrough
the4940DTthe
floor4941NNfloor
during4942INduring
the4943DTthe
period4944NNperiod
of4945INof
the4946DTthe
stay4947NNstay
and4948CCand
we4949PPwe
get4950VVPget
a4951DTa
new4952JJnew
Board4953NPBoard
,4954,,
then4955RBthen
they4956PPthey
're4957VBPbe
going4958VVGgo
to4959TOto
argue4960VVargue
that4961IN/thatthat
Board4962NPBoard
has4963VHZhave
to4964TOto
ratify4965VVratify
everything4966NNeverything
that4967WDTthat
was4968VBDbe
done4969VVNdo
during4970INduring
the4971DTthe
period4972NNperiod
of4973INof
the4974DTthe
stay4975NNstay
,4976,,
and4977CCand
they4978PPthey
're4979VBPbe
going4980VVGgo
to4981TOto
challenge4982VVchallenge
that4983DTthat
ratification4984NNratification
,4985,,
and4986CCand
,4987,,
of4988INof
course4989NNcourse
,4990,,
that4991DTthat
ratification4992NNratification
will4993MDwill
extend4994VVextend
backward4995RBbackward
in4996INin
time4997NNtime
,4998,,
further4999RBRfurther
and5000CCand
further5001RBRfurther
,5002,,
depending5003VVGdepend
on5004INon
what5005WPwhat
you5006PPyou
do5007VVPdo
with5008INwith
the5009DTthe
de5010FWde
facto5011FWfacto
officer5012NNofficer
doctrine5013NNdoctrine
.5014SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5015LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
The5016NPThe
...5017:...
the5018DTthe
...5019:...
the5020DTthe
big5021JJbig
question5022NNquestion
on5023INon
...5024:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]5025LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So5026RBso
,5027,,
I5028PPI
mean5029VVPmean
,5030,,
we5031PPwe
're5032VBPbe
litigating5033VVGlitigate
for5034INfor
years5035NNSyear
on5036INon
that5037DTthat
view5038NNview
.5039SENT.
It5040PPit
's5041VBZbe
just5042RBjust
a5043DTa
question5044NNquestion
of5045INof
how5046WRBhow
much5047JJmuch
we5048PPwe
're5049VBPbe
going5050VVGgo
to5051TOto
have5052VHhave
to5053TOto
litigate5054VVlitigate
with5055INwith
them5056PPthem
if5057INif
we5058PPwe
...5059:...
if5060INif
...5061:...
if5062INif
the5063DTthe
Court5064NPCourt
decides5065VVZdecide
we5066PPwe
're5067VBPbe
wrong5068JJwrong
on5069INon
the5070DTthe
merits5071NNSmerit
.5072SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5073LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Mr5074NPMr
...5075:...
.5076SENT.
Mr5077NPMr
.5078SENT.
Wall5079NPWall
,5080,,
do5081VVPdo
you5082PPyou
have5083VHPhave
to5084TOto
still5085RBstill
litigate5086VVlitigate
that5087IN/thatthat
here5088RBhere
?5089SENT?
You5090PPyou
're5091VBPbe
making5092VVGmake
an5093DTan
assumption5094NNassumption
that5095IN/thatthat
the5096DTthe
de5097FWde
facto5098FWfacto
doctrine5099NNdoctrine
does5100VVZdo
go5101VVgo
as5102RBas
far5103RBfar
as5104INas
you5105PPyou
say5106VVPsay
,5107,,
which5108WDTwhich
is5109VBZbe
to5110TOto
deprive5111VVdeprive
a5112DTa
winning5113VVGwin
party5114NNparty
of5115INof
no5116DTno
remedy5117NNremedy
whatsoever5118RBwhatsoever
.5119SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]5120LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
That5121DTthat
's5122VBZbe
not5123RBnot
true5124JJtrue
.5125SENT.
They5126PPthey
will5127MDwill
get5128VVget
prospective5129JJprospective
remedy5130NNremedy
as5131INas
all5132DTall
of5133INof
the5134DTthe
litigants5135NNSlitigant
did5136VVDdo
in5137INin
the5138DTthe
de5139FWde
facto5140FWfacto
officer5141NNofficer
cases5142NNScase
,5143,,
including5144VVGinclude
Buckley5145NPBuckley
.5146SENT.
It5147PPit
...5148:...
the5149DTthe
second5150NNsecond
this5151DTthis
Court5152NPCourt
's5153POS's
stay5154NNstay
expires5155VVZexpire
,5156,,
the5157DTthe
Board5158NPBoard
can5159MDcan
no5160RBno
longer5161RBRlonger
act5162VVact
with5163INwith
respect5164NNrespect
to5165TOto
Aurelius5166NPAurelius
,5167,,
Assured5168VVDassure
,5169,,
UTIER5170NPUTIER
,5171,,
or5172CCor
anybody5173NNanybody
else5174RBelse
.5175SENT.
What5176WPWhat
the5177DTthe
de5178FWde
facto5179FWfacto
officer5180NNofficer
doctrine5181NNdoctrine
says5182VVZsay
is5183VBZbe
,5184,,
even5185RBeven
though5186INthough
you5187PPyou
get5188VVPget
meaningful5189JJmeaningful
prospective5190JJprospective
relief5191NNrelief
,5192,,
we5193PPwe
do5194VVPdo
n't5195RBn't
invalidate5196VVinvalidate
everything5197NNeverything
done5198VVNdo
moving5199VVGmove
backward5200RBbackward
in5201INin
time5202NNtime
that5203IN/thatthat
the5204DTthe
officers5205NNSofficer
are5206VBPbe
alleged5207VVNallege
to5208TOto
have5209VHhave
done5210VVNdo
while5211INwhile
invalidly5212RBinvalidly
appointed5213VVNappoint
.5214SENT.
And5215CCand
so5216RBso
...5217:...
and5218CCand
I5219PPI
think5220VVPthink
that5221WDTthat
's5222VBZbe
critical5223JJcritical
here5224RBhere
because5225INbecause
the5226DTthe
Board5227NPBoard
's5228VHZhave
been5229VBNbe
acting5230VVGact
for5231INfor
three5232CDthree
years5233NNSyear
.5234SENT.
We5235PPwe
have5236VHPhave
,5237,,
you5238PPyou
know5239VVPknow
,5240,,
nearly5241RBnearly
1005242CD@card@
adversary5243NNadversary
proceedings5244NNSproceeding
,5245,,
hundreds5246NNShundred
of5247INof
thousands5248NNSthousand
of5249INof
claims5250NNSclaim
,5251,,
hundreds5252NNShundred
of5253INof
millions5254NNSmillion
of5255INof
dollars5256NNSdollar
collected5257VVNcollect
or5258CCor
paid5259VVNpay
out5260RPout
,5261,,
125262CD@card@
billion5263CDbillion
dollars5264NNSdollar
in5265INin
bonds5266NNSbond
issued5267VVNissue
in5268INin
the5269DTthe
COFINA5270NPCOFINA
Title5271NPTitle
III5272NPIII
proceeding5273NNproceeding
that5274WDTthat
have5275VHPhave
been5276VBNbe
traded5277VVNtrade
on5278INon
the5279DTthe
secondary5280JJsecondary
...5281:...
on5282INon
the5283DTthe
market5284NNmarket
something5285NNsomething
like5286INlike
85,0005287CD@card@
times5288NNStime
.5289SENT.
I5290PPI
mean5291VVPmean
,5292,,
I5293PPI
have5294VHPhave
no5295DTno
idea5296NNidea
how5297WRBhow
one5298PPone
unwinds5299VVZunwind
this5300DTthis
,5301,,
and5302CCand
I5303PPI
do5304VVPdo
n't5305RBn't
think5306VVthink
that5307DTthat
...5308:...
that5309IN/thatthat
Aurelius5310NPAurelius
and5311CCand
UTIER5312NPUTIER
have5313VHPhave
given5314VVNgive
any5315DTany
real5316JJreal
way5317NNway
to5318TOto
do5319VVdo
it5320PPit
.5321SENT.
And5322CCand
that5323DTthat
's5324VBZbe
exactly5325RBexactly
what5326WPwhat
the5327DTthe
de5328FWde
facto5329FWfacto
officer5330NNofficer
doctrine5331NNdoctrine
is5332VBZbe
for5333INfor
.5334SENT.
We5335PPwe
do5336VVPdo
n't5337RBn't
wipe5338VVwipe
everything5339NNeverything
out5340RPout
in5341INin
the5342DTthe
past5343NNpast
.5344SENT.
But5345CCbut
I5346PPI
do5347VVPdo
want5348VVwant
to5349TOto
say5350VVsay
that5351IN/thatthat
I5352PPI
do5353VVPdo
n't5354RBn't
think5355VVthink
we5356PPwe
get5357VVget
to5358TOto
that5359DTthat
.5360SENT.
I5361PPI
do5362VVPdo
n't5363RBn't
think5364VVthink
the5365DTthe
merits5366NNSmerit
here5367RBhere
are5368VBPbe
...5369:...
are5370VBPbe
close5371JJclose
.5372SENT.
Congress5373NPCongress
did5374VVDdo
its5375PP$its
homework5376NNhomework
.5377SENT.
It5378PPit
invoked5379VVDinvoke
Article5380NPArticle
IV5381NPIV
.5382SENT.
It5383PPit
told5384VVDtell
us5385PPus
where5386WRBwhere
it5387PPit
was5388VBDbe
putting5389VVGput
it5390PPit
...5391:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5392LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I5393PPI
thought5394VVDthink
your5395PP$your
argument5396NNargument
would5397MDwould
be5398VBbe
that5399IN/thatthat
if5400INif
you5401PPyou
lost5402VVDlose
,5403,,
there5404EXthere
would5405MDwould
also5406RBalso
be5407VBbe
a5408DTa
lot5409NNlot
of5410INof
legal5411JJlegal
ramifications5412NNSramification
in5413INin
terms5414NNSterm
of5415INof
calling5416VVGcall
into5417INinto
question5418NNquestion
the5419DTthe
status5420NNstatus
of5421INof
elected5422VVNelect
governors5423NNSgovernor
,5424,,
judges5425NNSjudge
,5426,,
territorial5427JJterritorial
judges5428NNSjudge
,5429,,
and5430CCand
the5431DTthe
like5432INlike
.5433SENT.
Is5434VBZbe
that5435IN/thatthat
not5436RBnot
the5437DTthe
case5438NNcase
?5439SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]5440LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Well5441UHwell
,5442,,
I5443PPI
think5444VVPthink
it5445PPit
depends5446VVZdepend
on5447INon
which5448WDTwhich
of5449INof
their5450PP$their
four5451CDfour
or5452CCor
maybe5453RBmaybe
five5454CDfive
tests5455NNStest
you5456PPyou
pick5457VVPpick
.5458SENT.
They5459PPthey
start5460VVPstart
with5461INwith
Buckley5462NPBuckley
.5463SENT.
If5464INif
they5465PPthey
're5466VBPbe
serious5467JJserious
about5468RBabout
that5469IN/thatthat
,5470,,
which5471WDTwhich
has5472VHZhave
significant5473JJsignificant
authority5474NNauthority
under5475INunder
federal5476JJfederal
law5477NNlaw
,5478,,
that5479WDTthat
's5480VBZbe
the5481DTthe
D5482NND
.5483SENT.
C5484LSc
.5485SENT.
mayor5486NNmayor
,5487,,
city5488NNcity
council5489NNcouncil
,5490,,
the5491DTthe
Guam5492NPGuam
and5493CCand
Virgin5494NPVirgin
Island5495NPIsland
governors5496NNSgovernor
,5497,,
and5498CCand
all5499DTall
territorial5500JJterritorial
legislators5501NNSlegislator
and5502CCand
judges5503NNSjudge
.5504SENT.
All5505DTall
of5506INof
that5507DTthat
authority5508NNauthority
flows5509VVZflow
directly5510RBdirectly
from5511INfrom
federal5512JJfederal
law5513NNlaw
,5514,,
whether5515INwhether
an5516DTan
organic5517JJorganic
act5518NNact
or5519CCor
the5520DTthe
D5521NPD
.5522SENT.
C5523LSc
.5524SENT.
Home5525NPHome
Rule5526NPRule
Act5527NPAct
.5528SENT.
So5529RBso
then5530RBthen
they5531PPthey
tweak5532VVPtweak
Buckley5533NPBuckley
to5534TOto
say5535VVsay
:5536::
Well5537UHWell
,5538,,
not5539RBnot
if5540INif
you5541PPyou
're5542VBPbe
elected5543VVNelect
.5544SENT.
And5545CCand
then5546RBthen
I5547PPI
say5548VVPsay
:5549::
Well5550UHWell
,5551,,
but5552CCbut
you5553PPyou
still5554RBstill
do5555VVPdo
n't5556RBn't
solve5557VVsolve
D5558NPD
.5559SENT.
C5560LSc
.5561SENT.
judges5562NNSjudge
,5563,,
territorial5564JJterritorial
judges5565NNSjudge
,5566,,
Washington5567NPWashington
mayors5568NNSmayor
,5569,,
early5570JJearly
territorial5571JJterritorial
upper5572JJupper
houses5573NNShouse
,5574,,
or5575CCor
the5576DTthe
D5577NPD
.5578SENT.
C5579LSc
.5580SENT.
Control5581NPControl
Board5582NPBoard
.5583SENT.
And5584CCand
then5585RBthen
they5586PPthey
say5587VVPsay
:5588::
Well5589UHWell
,5590,,
it5591PPit
's5592VBZbe
executing5593VVGexecute
federal5594JJfederal
law5595NNlaw
,5596,,
maybe5597RBmaybe
it5598PPit
's5599VBZbe
a5600DTa
special5601JJspecial
law5602NNlaw
,5603,,
maybe5604RBmaybe
it5605PPit
's5606VBZbe
federal5607JJfederal
objectives5608NNSobjective
,5609,,
maybe5610RBmaybe
it5611PPit
's5612VBZbe
federal5613JJfederal
removal5614NNremoval
and5615CCand
there5616EXthere
's5617VBZbe
a5618DTa
hodgepodge5619NNhodgepodge
of5620INof
other5621JJother
factors5622NNSfactor
thrown5623VVNthrow
in5624INin
there5625RBthere
.5626SENT.
If5627INif
the5628DTthe
Court5629NPCourt
accepts5630VVZaccept
those5631DTthose
,5632,,
notwithstanding5633INnotwithstanding
that5634WDTthat
there5635EXthere
are5636VBPbe
historical5637JJhistorical
counter-examples5638NNScounter-examples
to5639TOto
every5640DTevery
one5641CDone
of5642INof
those5643DTthose
tests5644NNStest
,5645,,
then5646RBthen
I5647PPI
suppose5648VVPsuppose
you5649PPyou
could5650MDcould
try5651VVtry
to5652TOto
carve5653VVcarve
out5654RPout
the5655DTthe
test5656NNtest
in5657INin
just5658RBjust
the5659DTthe
way5660NNway
as5661RBas
to5662TOto
pick5663VVpick
this5664DTthis
up5665RBup
.5666SENT.
But5667CCbut
I5668PPI
do5669VVPdo
n't5670RBn't
think5671VVthink
there5672EXthere
's5673VBZbe
any5674DTany
principled5675JJprincipled
way5676NNway
to5677TOto
do5678VVdo
it5679PPit
.5680SENT.
All5681DTall
of5682INof
the5683DTthe
federal5684JJfederal
authority5685NNauthority
that5686IN/thatthat
these5687DTthese
territorial5688JJterritorial
officers5689NNSofficer
and5690CCand
D5691NPD
.5692SENT.
C5693LSc
.5694SENT.
officers5695NNSofficer
exercise5696VVPexercise
flows5697NNSflow
from5698INfrom
federal5699JJfederal
law5700NNlaw
.5701SENT.
And5702CCand
if5703INif
you5704PPyou
take5705VVPtake
their5706PP$their
test5707NNtest
seriously5708RBseriously
,5709,,
yes5710UHyes
,5711,,
Justice5712NPJustice
Kavanaugh5713NPKavanaugh
,5714,,
it5715PPit
will5716MDwill
threaten5717VVthreaten
to5718TOto
undermine5719VVundermine
,5720,,
indeed5721RBindeed
I5722PPI
think5723VVPthink
it5724PPit
would5725MDwould
condemn5726VVcondemn
in5727INin
its5728PP$its
entirety5729NNentirety
,5730,,
home5731NNhome
rule5732NNrule
.5733SENT.
I5734PPI
mean5735VVPmean
...5736:...
and5737CCand
...5738:...
and5739CCand
that5740WDTthat
just5741RBjust
points5742VVZpoint
out5743RPout
...5744:...
I5745PPI
mean5746VVPmean
,5747,,
there5748EXthere
's5749VBZbe
both5750CCboth
an5751DTan
upper-level5752JJupper-level
and5753CCand
a5754DTa
lower-level5755JJlower-level
disruption5756NNdisruption
here5757RBhere
.5758SENT.
The5759DTthe
lower-level5760JJlower-level
disruption5761NNdisruption
is5762VBZbe
undoing5763VVGundo
three5764CDthree
years5765NNSyear
of5766INof
what5767WPwhat
the5768DTthe
Board5769NPBoard
has5770VHZhave
done5771VVNdo
to5772TOto
try5773VVtry
to5774TOto
stabilize5775VVstabilize
the5776DTthe
condition5777NNcondition
in5778INin
Puerto5779NPPuerto
Rico5780NPRico
.5781SENT.
The5782DTthe
upper-level5783JJupper-level
disruption5784NNdisruption
is5785VBZbe
every5786DTevery
test5787NNtest
they5788PPthey
've5789VHPhave
got5790VVNget
runs5791VVZrun
smack5792RBsmack
dab5793VVdab
into5794INinto
history5795NNhistory
,5796,,
and5797CCand
every5798DTevery
test5799NNtest
they5800PPthey
've5801VHPhave
got5802VVNget
would5803MDwould
federalize5804VVfederalize
some5805DTsome
number5806NNnumber
of5807INof
officers5808NNSofficer
who5809WPwho
have5810VHPhave
always5811RBalways
been5812VBNbe
thought5813VVNthink
of5814INof
as5815RBas
territorial5816JJterritorial
or5817CCor
local5818JJlocal
,5819,,
whether5820INwhether
in5821INin
D5822NPD
.5823SENT.
C5824LSc
.5825SENT.
or5826CCor
in5827INin
the5828DTthe
territories5829NNSterritory
.5830SENT.
And5831CCand
like5832INlike
I5833PPI
say5834VVPsay
,5835,,
I5836PPI
mean5837VVPmean
,5838,,
from5839INfrom
18025840CD@card@
to5841TOto
now5842RBnow
,5843,,
I5844PPI
mean5845VVPmean
,5846,,
if5847INif
...5848:...
if5849INif
...5850:...
if5851INif
Mr5852NPMr
.5853SENT.
Olson5854NPOlson
is5855VBZbe
serious5856JJserious
that5857IN/thatthat
significant5858JJsignificant
authority5859NNauthority
under5860INunder
federal5861JJfederal
law5862NNlaw
makes5863VVZmake
you5864PPyou
a5865DTa
federal5866JJfederal
officer5867NNofficer
,5868,,
well5869RBwell
,5870,,
then5871RBthen
,5872,,
so5873RBso
too5874RBtoo
the5875DTthe
D5876NPD
.5877SENT.
C5878LSc
.5879SENT.
judges5880NNSjudge
who5881WPwho
...5882:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5883LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That5884DTthat
's5885VBZbe
assuming5886VVGassume
that5887IN/thatthat
the5888DTthe
immediate5889JJimmediate
...5890:...
that5891IN/thatthat
you5892PPyou
're5893VBPbe
looking5894VVGlook
at5895INat
the5896DTthe
ultimate5897JJultimate
source5898NNsource
,5899,,
which5900WDTwhich
is5901VBZbe
a5902DTa
double5903JJdouble
jeopardy5904NNjeopardy
idea5905NNidea
.5906SENT.
And5907CCand
our5908PP$our
...5909:...
and5910CCand
our5911PP$our
opinion5912NNopinion
in5913INin
Sanchez5914NPSanchez
Valle5915NPValle
made5916VVDmake
it5917PPit
very5918RBvery
clear5919JJclear
that5920IN/thatthat
it5921PPit
was5922VBDbe
limited5923VVNlimit
to5924TOto
that5925DTthat
.5926SENT.
A5927DTa
much5928JJmuch
different5929JJdifferent
result5930NNresult
if5931INif
you5932PPyou
limit5933VVPlimit
it5934PPit
to5935TOto
what5936WPwhat
's5937VBZbe
the5938DTthe
immediate5939JJimmediate
source5940NNsource
.5941SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]5942LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Oh5943UHoh
,5944,,
yes5945UHyes
,5946,,
I5947PPI
do5948VVPdo
n't5949RBn't
disagree5950VVdisagree
that5951IN/thatthat
that5952DTthat
's5953VBZbe
kind5954NNkind
of5955INof
an5956DTan
...5957:...
an5958DTan
ad5959FWad
hoc5960FWhoc
limitation5961NNlimitation
that5962IN/thatthat
they5963PPthey
've5964VHPhave
thrown5965VVNthrow
on5966RPon
to5967TOto
try5968VVtry
to5969TOto
avoid5970VVavoid
the5971DTthe
consequences5972NNSconsequence
of5973INof
their5974PP$their
view5975NNview
.5976SENT.
But5977CCbut
just5978RBjust
to5979TOto
refine5980VVrefine
what5981WPwhat
you5982PPyou
said5983VVDsay
a5984DTa
little5985JJlittle
bit5986NNbit
,5987,,
Justice5988NPJustice
Sotomayor5989NPSotomayor
,5990,,
what5991WDTwhat
...5992:...
what5993WPwhat
I5994PPI
took5995VVDtake
Justice5996NPJustice
Kagan5997NPKagan
's5998POS's
opinion5999NNopinion
to6000TOto
be6001VBbe
saying6002VVGsay
in6003INin
Sanchez6004NPSanchez
Valle6005NPValle
is6006VBZbe
,6007,,
look6008VVlook
,6009,,
there6010EXthere
are6011VBPbe
other6012JJother
ways6013NNSway
you6014PPyou
could6015MDcould
have6016VHhave
defined6017VVNdefine
sovereignty6018NNsovereignty
or6019CCor
you6020PPyou
could6021MDcould
have6022VHhave
looked6023VVNlook
at6024INat
sovereignty6025NNsovereignty
,6026,,
but6027CCbut
,6028,,
if6029INif
we6030PPwe
're6031VBPbe
looking6032VVGlook
at6033INat
source6034NNsource
of6035INof
authority6036NNauthority
,6037,,
the6038DTthe
source6039NNsource
of6040INof
authority6041NNauthority
here6042RBhere
flows6043VVZflow
from6044INfrom
federal6045JJfederal
law6046NNlaw
.6047SENT.
Well6048UHwell
,6049,,
their6050PP$their
test6051NNtest
is6052VBZbe
a6053DTa
source6054NNsource
test6055NNtest
.6056SENT.
Their6057PP$their
test6058NNtest
is6059VBZbe
Buckley6060NPBuckley
.6061SENT.
Did6062VVDdo
you6063PPyou
get6064VVget
significant6065JJsignificant
authority6066NNauthority
from6067INfrom
federal6068JJfederal
law6069NNlaw
?6070SENT?
So6071RBso
maybe6072RBmaybe
there6073EXthere
are6074VBPbe
other6075JJother
tests6076NNStest
they6077PPthey
could6078MDcould
have6079VHhave
tried6080VVNtry
to6081TOto
come6082VVcome
up6083RPup
with6084INwith
,6085,,
but6086CCbut
theirs6087PPtheirs
is6088VBZbe
a6089DTa
source6090NNsource
test6091NNtest
.6092SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6093LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But6094CCbut
you6095PPyou
could6096MDcould
say6097VVsay
that6098IN/thatthat
about6099INabout
the6100DTthe
states6101NNSstate
.6102SENT.
The6103DTthe
Constitution6104NPConstitution
is6105VBZbe
the6106DTthe
source6107NNsource
of6108INof
their6109PP$their
power6110NNpower
because6111INbecause
the6112DTthe
compact6113NNcompact
with6114INwith
the6115DTthe
United6116NPUnited
States6117NPSStates
...6118:...
with6119INwith
...6120:...
their6121PP$their
very6122JJvery
existence6123NNexistence
is6124VBZbe
dependent6125JJdependent
on6126INon
that6127DTthat
.6128SENT.
But6129CCbut
we6130PPwe
do6131VVPdo
n't6132RBn't
define6133VVdefine
what6134WPwhat
a6135DTa
state6136NNstate
act6137NNact
is6138VBZbe
or6139CCor
a6140DTa
federal6141JJfederal
act6142NNact
by6143INby
their6144PP$their
original6145JJoriginal
source6146NNsource
.6147SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]6148LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Oh6149UHoh
,6150,,
well6151UHwell
...6152:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6153LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
We6154PPwe
define6155VVPdefine
it6156PPit
by6157INby
who6158WPwho
passed6159VVDpass
the6160DTthe
law6161NNlaw
,6162,,
the6163DTthe
state6164NNstate
or6165CCor
the6166DTthe
federal6167JJfederal
government6168NNgovernment
.6169SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]6170LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Well6171UHWell
,6172,,
except6173INexcept
that6174DTthat
under6175INunder
their6176PP$their
test6177NNtest
,6178,,
and6179CCand
I6180PPI
think6181VVPthink
under6182INunder
Sanchez6183NPSanchez
Valle6184NPValle
,6185,,
you6186PPyou
've6187VHPhave
got6188VVNget
to6189TOto
look6190VVlook
at6191INat
where6192WRBwhere
that6193DTthat
power6194NNpower
flowed6195VVDflow
from6196INfrom
,6197,,
where6198WRBwhere
did6199VVDdo
you6200PPyou
get6201VVget
that6202DTthat
authority6203NNauthority
.6204SENT.
And6205CCand
they6206PPthey
keep6207VVPkeep
saying6208VVGsay
authority6209NNauthority
under6210INunder
federal6211JJfederal
law6212NNlaw
.6213SENT.
Okay6214RBokay
,6215,,
well6216RBwell
,6217,,
if6218INif
that6219WDTthat
's6220VBZbe
your6221PP$your
test6222NNtest
,6223,,
all6224RBall
of6225INof
that6226DTthat
authority6227NNauthority
,6228,,
whether6229INwhether
with6230INwith
respect6231NNrespect
to6232TOto
D6233NPD
.6234SENT.
C6235LSc
.6236SENT.
or6237CCor
the6238DTthe
territories6239NNSterritory
,6240,,
flows6241NNSflow
from6242INfrom
federal6243JJfederal
law6244NNlaw
.6245SENT.
And6246CCand
,6247,,
of6248INof
course6249NNcourse
,6250,,
the6251DTthe
problem6252NNproblem
with6253INwith
the6254DTthe
test6255NNtest
,6256,,
Justice6257NPJustice
Sotomayor6258NPSotomayor
,6259,,
is6260VBZbe
Buckley6261NPBuckley
is6262VBZbe
a6263DTa
significance6264NNsignificance
test6265NNtest
.6266SENT.
It6267PPit
takes6268VVZtake
an6269DTan
officer6270NNofficer
who6271WPwho
's6272VBZbe
got6273VVNget
concededly6274RBconcededly
federal6275JJfederal
power6276NNpower
and6277CCand
says6278VVZsay
how6279WRBhow
significant6280JJsignificant
is6281VBZbe
their6282PP$their
power6283NNpower
?6284SENT?
Are6285VBPbe
they6286PPthey
an6287DTan
employee6288NNemployee
or6289CCor
are6290VBPbe
they6291PPthey
an6292DTan
officer6293NNofficer
?6294SENT?
It6295PPit
's6296VBZbe
not6297RBnot
designed6298VVNdesign
to6299TOto
answer6300VVanswer
the6301DTthe
predicate6302JJpredicate
question6303NNquestion
of6304INof
,6305,,
well6306RBwell
,6307,,
are6308VBPbe
they6309PPthey
exercising6310VVGexercise
federal6311JJfederal
power6312NNpower
or6313CCor
territorial6314JJterritorial
power6315NNpower
?6316SENT?
That6317DTthat
's6318VBZbe
the6319DTthe
question6320NNquestion
that6321IN/thatthat
Palmore6322NPPalmore
gets6323VVZget
at6324INat
.6325SENT.
Is6326VBZbe
it6327PPit
a6328DTa
D6329NPD
.6330SENT.
C6331LSc
.6332SENT.
court6333NNcourt
or6334CCor
is6335VBZbe
it6336PPit
an6337DTan
Article6338NPArticle
III6339NPIII
court6340NNcourt
?6341SENT?
And6342CCand
the6343DTthe
only6344JJonly
way6345NNway
you6346PPyou
know6347VVPknow
that6348WDTthat
is6349VBZbe
by6350INby
asking6351VVGask
two6352CDtwo
questions6353NNSquestion
:6354::
One6355CDOne
,6356,,
did6357VVDdo
Congress6358NPCongress
invoke6359VVinvoke
Article6360NNarticle
I6361PPI
or6362CCor
did6363VVDdo
it6364PPit
invoke6365VVinvoke
Article6366NPArticle
IV6367NPIV
?6368SENT?
And6369CCand
then6370RBthen
,6371,,
two6372CDtwo
...6373:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6374LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I6375PPI
've6376VHPhave
not6377RBnot
even6378RBeven
...6379:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]6380LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
...6381:...
did6382VVDdo
it6383PPit
do6384VVPdo
anything6385NNanything
under6386INunder
Article6387NPArticle
I6388NPI
or6389CCor
Article6390NPArticle
IV6391NPIV
that6392WDTthat
...6393:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6394LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Why6395WRBwhy
do6396VVPdo
you6397PPyou
bother6398VVbother
with6399INwith
the6400DTthe
third6401JJthird
?6402SENT?
If6403INif
you6404PPyou
give6405VVPgive
the6406DTthe
first6407JJfirst
...6408:...
assuming6409VVGassume
that6410IN/thatthat
,6411,,
as6412INas
your6413PP$your
adversary6414NNadversary
said6415VVDsay
,6416,,
if6417INif
Congress6418NPCongress
...6419:...
all6420RBall
it6421PPit
has6422VHZhave
to6423TOto
do6424VVdo
is6425VBZbe
wave6426VVwave
a6427DTa
magic6428JJmagic
wand6429NNwand
,6430,,
Article6431NPArticle
IV6432NPIV
,6433,,
and6434CCand
that6435IN/thatthat
that6436WDTthat
gives6437VVZgive
permission6438NNpermission
?6439SENT?
Obviously6440RBobviously
not6441RBnot
.6442SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]6443LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Oh6444UHoh
,6445,,
it6446PPit
's6447VBZbe
still6448RBstill
got6449VVNget
to6450TOto
be6451VBbe
...6452:...
it6453PPit
's6454VBZbe
got6455VVNget
...6456:...
first6457RBfirst
,6458,,
you6459PPyou
've6460VHPhave
got6461VVNget
to6462TOto
ask6463VVask
where6464WRBwhere
it6465PPit
was6466VBDbe
trying6467VVGtry
to6468TOto
put6469VVput
the6470DTthe
office6471NNoffice
.6472SENT.
That6473DTthat
's6474VBZbe
the6475DTthe
first6476JJfirst
step6477NNstep
.6478SENT.
And6479CCand
then6480RBthen
you6481PPyou
've6482VHPhave
got6483VVNget
to6484TOto
ask6485VVask
whether6486INwhether
it6487PPit
had6488VHDhave
the6489DTthe
constitutional6490JJconstitutional
power6491NNpower
to6492TOto
do6493VVdo
that6494DTthat
thing6495NNthing
.6496SENT.
Did6497VVDdo
it6498PPit
do6499VVPdo
something6500NNsomething
under6501INunder
Article6502NPArticle
I6503NPI
or6504CCor
under6505INunder
Article6506NPArticle
IV6507NPIV
that6508IN/thatthat
it6509PPit
could6510MDcould
n't6511RBn't
do6512VVdo
?6513SENT?
And6514CCand
the6515DTthe
very6516RBvery
first6517JJfirst
sentence6518NNsentence
of6519INof
the6520DTthe
court6521NNcourt
of6522INof
appeals6523NNSappeal
discussion6524NNdiscussion
is6525VBZbe
no6526RBno
one6527CDone
here6528RBhere
has6529VHZhave
claimed6530VVNclaim
that6531DTthat
anything6532NNanything
in6533INin
PROMESA6534NPPROMESA
extends6535VVZextend
beyond6536INbeyond
Congress6537NPCongress
's6538POS's
reach6539NNreach
under6540INunder
Article6541NPArticle
IV6542NPIV
.6543SENT.
And6544CCand
that6545DTthat
's6546VBZbe
true6547JJtrue
.6548SENT.
There6549EXthere
's6550VBZbe
not6551RBnot
a6552DTa
word6553NNword
in6554INin
these6555DTthese
briefs6556NNSbrief
from6557INfrom
Aurelius6558NPAurelius
or6559CCor
UTIER6560NPUTIER
claiming6561VVGclaim
that6562IN/thatthat
there6563EXthere
is6564VBZbe
any6565DTany
power6566NNpower
vested6567VVNvest
in6568INin
the6569DTthe
Board6570NPBoard
that6571WDTthat
is6572VBZbe
not6573RBnot
among6574INamong
Congress6575NPCongress
's6576POS's
plenary6577JJplenary
power6578NNpower
under6579INunder
Article6580NPArticle
IV6581NPIV
.6582SENT.
That6583DTthat
's6584VBZbe
the6585DTthe
end6586NNend
of6587INof
the6588DTthe
analysis6589NNanalysis
,6590,,
I6591PPI
think6592VVPthink
,6593,,
correctly6594RBcorrectly
understood6595VVNunderstand
.6596SENT.
What6597WPWhat
was6598VBDbe
Congress6599NPCongress
doing6600VVGdo
?6601SENT?
It6602PPit
was6603VBDbe
putting6604VVGput
it6605PPit
in6606INin
the6607DTthe
territorial6608JJterritorial
government6609NNgovernment
.6610SENT.
Did6611VVDdo
it6612PPit
give6613VVPgive
it6614PPit
any6615DTany
power6616NNpower
it6617PPit
did6618VVDdo
n't6619RBn't
have6620VHhave
under6621INunder
Article6622NPArticle
IV6623NPIV
?6624SENT?
They6625PPthey
have6626VHPhave
n't6627RBn't
claimed6628VVNclaim
that6629IN/thatthat
it6630PPit
did6631VVDdo
.6632SENT.
That6633DTthat
under6634INunder
Palmore6635NPPalmore
,6636,,
I6637PPI
think6638VVPthink
,6639,,
is6640VBZbe
the6641DTthe
end6642NNend
of6643INof
the6644DTthe
analysis6645NNanalysis
.6646SENT.
Congress6647NPCongress
invoked6648VVDinvoke
its6649PP$its
plenary6650JJplenary
power6651NNpower
.6652SENT.
It6653PPit
did6654VVDdo
n't6655RBn't
do6656VVdo
anything6657NNanything
Article6658NPArticle
IV6659NPIV
did6660VVDdo
n't6661RBn't
give6662VVgive
it6663PPit
the6664DTthe
power6665NNpower
to6666TOto
do6667VVdo
.6668SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6669LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
And6670CCand
,6671,,
Mr6672NPMr
.6673SENT.
Wall6674NPWall
,6675,,
what6676WPwhat
is6677VBZbe
your6678PP$your
answer6679NNanswer
to6680TOto
the6681DTthe
question6682NNquestion
that6683IN/thatthat
Justice6684NPJustice
Sotomayor6685NPSotomayor
started6686VVDstart
off6687RPoff
with6688INwith
about6689INabout
the6690DTthe
difference6691NNdifference
between6692INbetween
these6693DTthese
Board6694NPBoard
members6695NNSmember
and6696CCand
a6697DTa
U6698NPU
.6699SENT.
S6700NPS
.6701SENT.
attorney6702NNattorney
?6703SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]6704LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
It6705PPit
's6706VBZbe
the6707DTthe
same6708JJsame
one6709CDone
that6710IN/thatthat
Mr6711NPMr
.6712SENT.
Verrilli6713NPVerrilli
gave6714VVDgive
,6715,,
which6716WDTwhich
is6717VBZbe
where6718WRBwhere
you6719PPyou
have6720VHPhave
executive6721JJexecutive
officers6722NNSofficer
who6723WPwho
are6724VBPbe
acting6725VVGact
under6726INunder
statutes6727NNSstatute
of6728INof
nationwide6729JJnationwide
application6730NNapplication
,6731,,
we6732PPwe
think6733VVPthink
that6734IN/thatthat
that6735WDTthat
's6736VBZbe
best6737RBSwell
understood6738VVNunderstand
to6739TOto
be6740VBbe
exercising6741VVGexercise
federal6742JJfederal
...6743:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6744LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
How6745WRBHow
about6746RBabout
...6747:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]6748LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
...6749:...
executive6750JJexecutive
power6751NNpower
.6752SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6753LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...6754:...
if6755INif
PROMESA6756NPPROMESA
had6757VHDhave
,6758,,
instead6759RBinstead
of6760INof
setting6761VVGset
it6762PPit
up6763RPup
the6764DTthe
way6765NNway
it6766PPit
did6767VVDdo
,6768,,
had6769VHDhave
just6770RBjust
...6771:...
had6772VHDhave
amended6773VVNamend
Chapter6774NPChapter
96775CD9
of6776INof
the6777DTthe
federal6778JJfederal
bankruptcy6779NNbankruptcy
laws6780NNSlaw
and6781CCand
said6782VVDsay
Puerto6783NPPuerto
Rico6784NPRico
instrumentalities6785NNSinstrumentality
get6786VVPget
to6787TOto
use6788VVuse
Chapter6789NPChapter
96790CD9
the6791DTthe
way6792NNway
everybody6793NNeverybody
else6794RBelse
does6795VVZdo
,6796,,
then6797RBthen
creates6798VVZcreate
the6799DTthe
Board6800NPBoard
to6801TOto
do6802VVdo
that6803DTthat
.6804SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]6805LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Yeah6806NPYeah
,6807,,
I6808PPI
...6809:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6810LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
What6811WPWhat
...6812:...
what6813WPwhat
of6814INof
that6815DTthat
?6816SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]6817LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
I6818PPI
...6819:...
I6820PPI
do6821VVPdo
n't6822RBn't
think6823VVthink
the6824DTthe
form6825NNform
of6826INof
that6827DTthat
matters6828NNSmatter
.6829SENT.
You6830PPyou
're6831VBPbe
asking6832VVGask
the6833DTthe
same6834JJsame
two6835CDtwo
questions6836NNSquestion
.6837SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6838LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Because6839INbecause
there6840RBthere
,6841,,
there6842EXthere
is6843VBZbe
a6844DTa
...6845:...
I6846PPI
...6847:...
I6848PPI
guess6849VVPguess
what6850WPwhat
I6851PPI
was6852VBDbe
suggesting6853VVGsuggest
was6854VBDbe
that6855IN/thatthat
on6856INon
...6857:...
on6858INon
that6859WDTthat
there6860EXthere
would6861MDwould
be6862VBbe
a6863DTa
uniform6864JJuniform
national6865JJnational
law6866NNlaw
.6867SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]6868LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Oh6869UHoh
,6870,,
I6871PPI
...6872:...
I6873PPI
think6874VVPthink
you6875PPyou
'd6876MDwould
have6877VHhave
to6878TOto
ask6879VVask
the6880DTthe
same6881JJsame
two6882CDtwo
questions6883NNSquestion
.6884SENT.
Was6885VBDbe
Congress6886NPCongress
doing6887VVGdo
that6888IN/thatthat
under6889INunder
the6890DTthe
bankruptcy6891NNbankruptcy
clause6892NNclause
in6893INin
Article6894NPArticle
I6895NPI
or6896CCor
doing6897VVGdo
it6898PPit
under6899INunder
the6900DTthe
Territory6901NPTerritory
Clause6902NNclause
in6903INin
Article6904NPArticle
IV6905NPIV
to6906TOto
just6907RBjust
create6908VVcreate
or6909CCor
extend6910VVextend
those6911DTthose
laws6912NNSlaw
to6913TOto
the6914DTthe
territory6915NNterritory
?6916SENT?
And6917CCand
then6918RBthen
did6919VVDdo
it6920PPit
do6921VVPdo
...6922:...
did6923VVDdo
it6924PPit
put6925VVDput
any6926DTany
powers6927NNSpower
in6928INin
that6929DTthat
office6930NNoffice
that6931IN/thatthat
it6932PPit
could6933MDcould
n't6934RBn't
have6935VHhave
under6936INunder
Article6937NPArticle
IV6938NPIV
.6939SENT.
So6940RBso
I6941PPI
think6942VVPthink
it6943PPit
'd6944MDwould
be6945VBbe
the6946DTthe
same6947JJsame
answer6948NNanswer
if6949INif
,6950,,
when6951WRBwhen
extending6952VVGextend
the6953DTthe
bankruptcy6954NNbankruptcy
statute6955NNstatute
,6956,,
it6957PPit
had6958VHDhave
said6959VVNsay
we6960PPwe
're6961VBPbe
extending6962VVGextend
a6963DTa
similar6964JJsimilar
system6965NNsystem
to6966TOto
Puerto6967NPPuerto
Rico6968NPRico
.6969SENT.
We6970PPwe
're6971VBPbe
invoking6972VVGinvoke
Article6973NPArticle
IV6974NPIV
.6975SENT.
We6976PPwe
are6977VBPbe
creating6978VVGcreate
this6979DTthis
new6980JJnew
board6981NNboard
to6982TOto
oversee6983VVoversee
these6984DTthese
new6985JJnew
bankruptcy6986NNbankruptcy
proceedings6987NNSproceeding
.6988SENT.
And6989CCand
we6990PPwe
are6991VBPbe
putting6992VVGput
that6993IN/thatthat
in6994INin
the6995DTthe
Puerto6996NPPuerto
Rican6997JJRican
government6998NNgovernment
.6999SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7000LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Well7001UHWell
,7002,,
then7003RBthen
it7004PPit
does7005VVZdo
n't7006RBn't
seem7007VVseem
to7008TOto
have7009VHhave
much7010JJmuch
to7011TOto
do7012VVdo
with7013INwith
whether7014INwhether
the7015DTthe
law7016NNlaw
is7017VBZbe
nationwide7018JJnationwide
or7019CCor
not7020RBnot
,7021,,
because7022INbecause
my7023PP$my
hypothetical7024JJhypothetical
was7025VBDbe
nationwide7026JJnationwide
law7027NNlaw
,7028,,
and7029CCand
you7030PPyou
're7031VBPbe
saying7032VVGsay
it7033PPit
would7034MDwould
n't7035RBn't
matter7036VVmatter
because7037INbecause
Congress7038NPCongress
said7039VVDsay
it7040PPit
was7041VBDbe
using7042VVGuse
Article7043NPArticle
IV7044NPIV
.7045SENT.
But7046CCbut
it7047PPit
's7048VBZbe
got7049VVNget
to7050TOto
be7051VBbe
more7052JJRmore
than7053INthan
...7054:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]7055LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
So7056RBso
...7057:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7058LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...7059:...
what7060WPwhat
Congress7061NPCongress
said7062VVDsay
,7063,,
right7064RBright
?7065SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]7066LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
...7067:...
so7068INso
I7069PPI
...7070:...
I7071PPI
think7072VVPthink
that7073WDTthat
is7074VBZbe
pressing7075VVGpress
at7076INat
exactly7077RBexactly
the7078DTthe
tough7079JJtough
question7080NNquestion
,7081,,
which7082WDTwhich
I7083PPI
'm7084VBPbe
going7085VVGgo
to7086TOto
say7087VVsay
fortunately7088RBfortunately
is7089VBZbe
not7090RBnot
presented7091VVNpresent
here7092RBhere
,7093,,
because7094INbecause
it7095PPit
's7096VBZbe
a7097DTa
territory-specific7098JJterritory-specific
statute7099NNstatute
and7100CCand
it7101PPit
's7102VBZbe
only7103RBonly
acting7104VVGact
in7105INin
the7106DTthe
territory7107NNterritory
.7108SENT.
But7109CCbut
Palmore7110NPPalmore
does7111VVZdo
say7112VVsay
primarily7113RBprimarily
local7114JJlocal
.7115SENT.
And7116CCand
it7117PPit
's7118VBZbe
a7119DTa
little7120RBlittle
tough7121JJtough
to7122TOto
figure7123VVfigure
out7124RPout
exactly7125RBexactly
what7126WPwhat
it7127PPit
means7128VVZmean
.7129SENT.
It7130PPit
seems7131VVZseem
to7132TOto
think7133VVthink
that7134IN/thatthat
,7135,,
if7136INif
you7137PPyou
're7138VBPbe
doing7139VVGdo
the7140DTthe
D7141NPD
.7142SENT.
C7143LSc
.7144SENT.
code7145VVcode
most7146JJSmost
of7147INof
the7148DTthe
time7149NNtime
,7150,,
rather7151RBrather
than7152INthan
federal7153JJfederal
statutes7154NNSstatute
most7155JJSmost
of7156INof
the7157DTthe
time7158NNtime
,7159,,
adjudicating7160VVGadjudicate
,7161,,
you7162PPyou
're7163VBPbe
local7164JJlocal
,7165,,
which7166WDTwhich
seems7167VVZseem
to7168TOto
point7169VVpoint
up7170RPup
that7171IN/thatthat
you7172PPyou
can7173MDcan
do7174VVdo
a7175DTa
little7176JJlittle
bit7177NNbit
of7178INof
the7179DTthe
nationwide7180JJnationwide
thing7181NNthing
without7182INwithout
converting7183VVGconvert
into7184INinto
a7185DTa
federal7186JJfederal
officer7187NNofficer
.7188SENT.
And7189CCand
we7190PPwe
know7191VVPknow
that7192WDTthat
's7193VBZbe
true7194JJtrue
of7195INof
territorial7196JJterritorial
judges7197NNSjudge
.7198SENT.
That7199DTthat
's7200VBZbe
the7201DTthe
best7202RBSwell
historical7203JJhistorical
example7204NNexample
.7205SENT.
They7206PPthey
were7207VBDbe
hearing7208VVGhear
matters7209NNSmatter
in7210INin
the7211DTthe
territory7212NNterritory
,7213,,
but7214CCbut
they7215PPthey
were7216VBDbe
adjudicating7217VVGadjudicate
them7218PPthem
under7219INunder
federal7220JJfederal
law7221NNlaw
.7222SENT.
So7223RBso
I7224PPI
think7225VVPthink
that7226IN/thatthat
you7227PPyou
're7228VBPbe
asking7229VVGask
a7230DTa
really7231RBreally
tough7232JJtough
question7233NNquestion
about7234RBabout
,7235,,
well7236RBwell
,7237,,
what7238WPwhat
does7239VVZdo
local7240JJlocal
mean7241NNmean
?7242SENT?
Does7243VVZdo
it7244PPit
mean7245VVPmean
you7246PPyou
're7247VBPbe
doing7248VVGdo
only7249RBonly
the7250DTthe
local7251JJlocal
matters7252NNSmatter
,7253,,
or7254CCor
does7255VVZdo
it7256PPit
go7257VVgo
to7258TOto
the7259DTthe
geographic7260JJgeographic
scope7261NNscope
of7262INof
the7263DTthe
statute7264NNstatute
under7265INunder
which7266WDTwhich
you7267PPyou
act7268VVPact
?7269SENT?
I7270PPI
think7271VVPthink
it7272PPit
's7273VBZbe
tough7274JJtough
.7275SENT.
Palmore7276NPPalmore
seems7277VVZseem
to7278TOto
indicate7279VVindicate
the7280DTthe
scope7281NNscope
of7282INof
the7283DTthe
statute7284NNstatute
might7285MDmight
matter7286VVmatter
.7287SENT.
History7288NNhistory
seems7289VVZseem
to7290TOto
indicate7291VVindicate
it7292PPit
might7293MDmight
not7294RBnot
if7295INif
what7296WPwhat
you7297PPyou
're7298VBPbe
doing7299VVGdo
is7300VBZbe
local7301JJlocal
.7302SENT.
And7303CCand
,7304,,
again7305RBagain
,7306,,
all7307RBall
I7308PPI
can7309MDcan
say7310VVsay
is7311VBZbe
I7312PPI
think7313VVPthink
this7314DTthis
is7315VBZbe
the7316DTthe
easy7317JJeasy
case7318NNcase
because7319INbecause
here7320RBhere
we7321PPwe
...7322:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7323LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Although7324INalthough
this7325DTthis
case7326NNcase
...7327:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]7328LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
...7329:...
check7330VVcheck
both7331DTboth
boxes7332NNSbox
.7333SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7334LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...7335:...
is7336VBZbe
n't7337RBn't
all7338PDTall
that7339DTthat
different7340JJdifferent
from7341INfrom
my7342PP$my
hypothetical7343JJhypothetical
,7344,,
right7345RBright
,7346,,
because7347INbecause
essentially7348RBessentially
what7349WPwhat
PROMESA7350NPPROMESA
does7351VVZdo
is7352VBZbe
it7353PPit
replicates7354VVZreplicate
all7355PDTall
the7356DTthe
procedures7357NNSprocedure
of7358INof
Chapter7359NPChapter
97360CD9
.7361SENT.
I7362PPI
mean7363VVPmean
,7364,,
it7365PPit
's7366VBZbe
not7367RBnot
coming7368VVGcome
up7369RPup
with7370INwith
a7371DTa
new7372JJnew
thing7373NNthing
.7374SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]7375LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
I7376PPI
mean7377VVPmean
,7378,,
it7379PPit
...7380:...
it7381PPit
's7382VBZbe
similar7383JJsimilar
in7384INin
most7385JJSmost
respects7386NNSrespect
,7387,,
but7388CCbut
I7389PPI
actually7390RBactually
do7391VVPdo
n't7392RBn't
think7393VVthink
that7394IN/thatthat
changes7395NNSchange
the7396DTthe
analysis7397NNanalysis
.7398SENT.
I7399PPI
mean7400VVPmean
,7401,,
when7402WRBwhen
the7403DTthe
Detroit7404NPDetroit
mayor7405NNmayor
walks7406VVZwalk
in7407INin
under7408INunder
Chapter7409NPChapter
97410CD9
and7411CCand
files7412NNSfile
for7413INfor
municipal7414JJmunicipal
bankruptcy7415NNbankruptcy
,7416,,
we7417PPwe
do7418VVPdo
n't7419RBn't
think7420VVthink
that7421IN/thatthat
simply7422RBsimply
because7423INbecause
he7424PPhe
has7425VHZhave
invoked7426VVNinvoke
some7427DTsome
power7428NNpower
granted7429VVNgrant
to7430TOto
him7431PPhim
by7432INby
federal7433JJfederal
law7434NNlaw
that7435IN/thatthat
he7436PPhe
becomes7437VVZbecome
a7438DTa
federal7439JJfederal
officer7440NNofficer
.7441SENT.
I7442PPI
mean7443VVPmean
,7444,,
here7445RBhere
,7446,,
the7447DTthe
Board7448NPBoard
basically7449RBbasically
represents7450VVZrepresent
the7451DTthe
Commonwealth7452NPCommonwealth
.7453SENT.
It7454PPit
's7455VBZbe
almost7456RBalmost
like7457INlike
the7458DTthe
debtor7459NNdebtor
.7460SENT.
All7461RBall
it7462PPit
does7463VVZdo
is7464VBZbe
,7465,,
if7466INif
the7467DTthe
Commonwealth7468NPCommonwealth
says7469VVZsay
restructure7470VVrestructure
our7471PP$our
debt7472NNdebt
,7473,,
it7474PPit
walks7475VVZwalk
in7476INin
and7477CCand
files7478VVZfile
the7479DTthe
petition7480NNpetition
in7481INin
federal7482JJfederal
court7483NNcourt
.7484SENT.
It7485PPit
then7486RBthen
basically7487RBbasically
represents7488VVZrepresent
the7489DTthe
debtor7490NNdebtor
,7491,,
not7492RBnot
different7493JJdifferent
from7494INfrom
any7495DTany
other7496JJother
state7497NNstate
or7498CCor
municipality7499NNmunicipality
,7500,,
tries7501VVZtry
to7502TOto
work7503VVwork
out7504RPout
the7505DTthe
claims7506NNSclaim
with7507INwith
the7508DTthe
creditor7509NNcreditor
,7510,,
and7511CCand
then7512RBthen
ultimately7513RBultimately
Judge7514NPJudge
Swain7515NPSwain
has7516VHZhave
to7517TOto
sort7518VVsort
out7519RPout
the7520DTthe
plan7521NNplan
and7522CCand
confirm7523VVconfirm
something7524NNsomething
in7525INin
the7526DTthe
bankruptcy7527NNbankruptcy
.7528SENT.
So7529RBso
I7530PPI
do7531VVPdo
n't7532RBn't
think7533VVthink
in7534INin
that7535DTthat
respect7536NNrespect
it7537PPit
's7538VBZbe
acting7539VVGact
any7540RBany
differently7541RBdifferently
from7542INfrom
any7543DTany
state7544NNstate
or7545CCor
locality7546NNlocality
that7547WDTthat
declares7548VVZdeclare
under7549INunder
Chapter7550NPChapter
97551CD9
.7552SENT.
It7553PPit
's7554VBZbe
still7555RBstill
...7556:...
under7557INunder
Palmore7558NPPalmore
,7559,,
it7560PPit
's7561VBZbe
still7562RBstill
focused7563VVNfocus
on7564INon
local7565JJlocal
matters7566NNSmatter
.7567SENT.
Everything7568NNEverything
the7569DTthe
Board7570NPBoard
is7571VBZbe
doing7572VVGdo
,7573,,
it7574PPit
's7575VBZbe
doing7576VVGdo
in7577INin
Puerto7578NPPuerto
Rico7579NPRico
,7580,,
which7581WDTwhich
is7582VBZbe
why7583WRBwhy
I7584PPI
do7585VVPdo
n't7586RBn't
think7587VVthink
they7588PPthey
've7589VHPhave
tried7590VVNtry
to7591TOto
claim7592VVclaim
,7593,,
look7594VVlook
,7595,,
you7596PPyou
needed7597VVDneed
any7598DTany
Article7599NPArticle
I7600NNI
power7601NNpower
.7602SENT.
All7603RBall
you7604PPyou
needed7605VVDneed
was7606VBDbe
Article7607NPArticle
IV7608NPIV
.7609SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7610LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Suppose7611VVPsuppose
Congress7612NPCongress
invokes7613VVZinvoke
Article7614NPArticle
IV7615NPIV
and7616CCand
puts7617VVZput
it7618PPit
in7619INin
the7620DTthe
territorial7621JJterritorial
government7622NNgovernment
,7623,,
as7624INas
it7625PPit
's7626VBZbe
done7627VVNdo
here7628RBhere
,7629,,
but7630CCbut
assigns7631VVZassign
some7632DTsome
matters7633NNSmatter
that7634RBthat
...7635:...
to7636TOto
pick7637VVpick
up7638RPup
on7639INon
Justice7640NPJustice
Kagan7641NPKagan
's7642POS's
questions7643NNSquestion
...7644:...
are7645VBPbe
more7646RBRmore
national7647JJnational
than7648INthan
local7649JJlocal
.7650SENT.
Is7651VBZbe
the7652DTthe
remedy7653NNremedy
for7654INfor
that7655DTthat
problem7656NNproblem
to7657TOto
say7658VVsay
that7659IN/thatthat
that7660DTthat
officer7661NNofficer
can7662MDcan
't7663RB't
perform7664VVperform
the7665DTthe
more7666RBRmore
national7667JJnational
duties7668NNSduty
,7669,,
or7670CCor
is7671VBZbe
the7672DTthe
remedy7673NNremedy
for7674INfor
that7675WDTthat
to7676TOto
say7677VVsay
that7678IN/thatthat
the7679DTthe
...7680:...
the7681DTthe
office7682NNoffice
is7683VBZbe
invalid7684JJinvalid
because7685INbecause
it7686PPit
's7687VBZbe
appointed7688VVNappoint
in7689INin
violation7690NNviolation
of7691INof
the7692DTthe
Appointments7693NNSappointment
Clause7694NNclause
?7695SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]7696LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Well7697UHWell
,7698,,
first7699RBfirst
,7700,,
Justice7701NPJustice
Kavanaugh7702NPKavanaugh
,7703,,
I7704PPI
do7705VVPdo
n't7706RBn't
want7707VVwant
to7708TOto
...7709:...
to7710TOto
grant7711VVgrant
that7712IN/thatthat
that7713DTthat
office7714NNoffice
would7715MDwould
be7716VBbe
unconstitutional7717JJunconstitutional
.7718SENT.
It7719PPit
's7720VBZbe
pressing7721VVGpress
.7722SENT.
It7723PPit
's7724VBZbe
a7725DTa
tough7726JJtough
question7727NNquestion
Justice7728NPJustice
Kagan7729NPKagan
was7730VBDbe
getting7731VVGget
at7732INat
.7733SENT.
So7734RBso
what7735WPwhat
does7736VVZdo
Palmore7737NPPalmore
mean7738VVmean
by7739INby
primarily7740RBprimarily
?7741SENT?
It7742PPit
seems7743VVZseem
to7744TOto
leave7745VVleave
some7746DTsome
room7747NNroom
to7748TOto
do7749VVdo
nationwide7750JJnationwide
or7751CCor
federal7752JJfederal
things7753NNSthing
as7754RBas
long7755RBlong
as7756INas
you7757PPyou
are7758VBPbe
focused7759VVNfocus
on7760INon
the7761DTthe
territory7762NNterritory
.7763SENT.
But7764CCbut
if7765INif
you7766PPyou
assume7767VVPassume
that7768IN/thatthat
it7769PPit
's7770VBZbe
got7771VVNget
to7772TOto
be7773VBbe
exclusive7774JJexclusive
...7775:...
a7776DTa
test7777NNtest
that7778IN/thatthat
I7779PPI
think7780VVPthink
we7781PPwe
meet7782VVPmeet
here7783RBhere
...7784:...
I7785PPI
think7786VVPthink
it7787PPit
's7788VBZbe
a7789DTa
hard7790JJhard
question7791NNquestion
what7792WPwhat
the7793DTthe
remedy7794NNremedy
would7795MDwould
be7796VBbe
.7797SENT.
I7798PPI
think7799VVPthink
you7800PPyou
'd7801MDwould
still7802RBstill
have7803VHhave
the7804DTthe
de7805FWde
facto7806FWfacto
officer7807NNofficer
potentially7808RBpotentially
going7809VVGgo
...7810:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7811LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well7812UHwell
,7813,,
I7814PPI
'm7815VBPbe
asking7816VVGask
a7817DTa
...7818:...
[MR. WALL J.B.]7819LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
...7820:...
outside7821NNoutside
...7822:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7823LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...7824:...
different7825JJdifferent
question7826NNquestion
.7827SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]7828LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
...7829:...
unless7830INunless
it7831PPit
's7832VBZbe
an7833DTan
adjudicator7834NNadjudicator
.7835SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7836LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Wouldn't7837NPWouldn't
...7838:...
would7839MDwould
n't7840RBn't
the7841DTthe
officer7842NNofficer
still7843RBstill
be7844VBbe
a7845DTa
valid7846JJvalid
territorial7847JJterritorial
officer7848NNofficer
but7849CCbut
perhaps7850RBperhaps
exercising7851VVGexercise
some7852DTsome
duties7853NNSduty
that7854IN/thatthat
he7855PPhe
or7856CCor
she7857PPshe
cannot7858MDcan
exercise7859VVexercise
?7860SENT?
[MR. WALL J.B.]7861LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
I7862PPI
think7863VVPthink
that7864DTthat
's7865VBZbe
a7866DTa
potential7867JJpotential
remedy7868NNremedy
.7869SENT.
We7870PPwe
have7871VHPhave
n't7872RBn't
looked7873VVNlook
at7874INat
that7875DTthat
here7876RBhere
.7877SENT.
We7878PPwe
have7879VHPhave
n't7880RBn't
briefed7881VVNbrief
it7882PPit
.7883SENT.
I7884PPI
do7885VVPdo
think7886VVthink
that7887IN/thatthat
it7888PPit
kind7889RBkind
of7890INof
...7891:...
it7892PPit
highlights7893VVZhighlight
the7894DTthe
oddity7895NNoddity
of7896INof
the7897DTthe
other7898JJother
side7899NNside
's7900POS's
claim7901NNclaim
.7902SENT.
It7903PPit
's7904VBZbe
not7905RBnot
as7906RBas
if7907INif
they7908PPthey
're7909VBPbe
pointing7910VVGpoint
to7911TOto
some7912DTsome
federal7913JJfederal
power7914NNpower
provision7915NNprovision
that7916WDTthat
...7917:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7918LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well7919UHwell
,7920,,
I7921PPI
think7922VVPthink
it7923PPit
highlights7924VVZhighlight
the7925DTthe
difficulty7926NNdifficulty
,7927,,
as7928INas
Justice7929NPJustice
Kagan7930NPKagan
said7931VVDsay
,7932,,
at7933INat
the7934DTthe
primarily7935RBprimarily
local7936JJlocal
,7937,,
because7938INbecause
the7939DTthe
word7940NNword
"7941``"
primarily7942RBprimarily
,7943,,
"7944``"
you7945PPyou
were7946VBDbe
very7947RBvery
careful7948JJcareful
in7949INin
your7950PP$your
brief7951NNbrief
to7952TOto
have7953VHhave
that7954DTthat
each7955DTeach
time7956NNtime
you7957PPyou
articulate7958VVParticulate
the7959DTthe
test7960NNtest
.7961SENT.
And7962CCand
I7963PPI
'm7964VBPbe
not7965RBnot
sure7966JJsure
how7967WRBhow
we7968PPwe
're7969VBPbe
supposed7970VVNsuppose
to7971TOto
figure7972VVfigure
that7973IN/thatthat
out7974RBout
.7975SENT.
[MR. WALL J.B.]7976LOC[MR. WALL J.B.]
Justice7977NPJustice
Kavanaugh7978NPKavanaugh
,7979,,
I7980PPI
think7981VVPthink
you7982PPyou
need7983VVPneed
it7984PPit
there7985RBthere
.7986SENT.
We7987PPwe
've7988VHPhave
known7989VVNknow
since7990INsince
Cantor7991NPCantor
in7992INin
that7993DTthat
territorial7994JJterritorial
judges7995NNSjudge
are7996VBPbe
not7997RBnot
federal7998JJfederal
officers7999NNSofficer
.8000SENT.
And8001CCand
yet8002RByet
they8003PPthey
are8004VBPbe
adjudicating8005VVGadjudicate
cases8006NNScase
under8007INunder
federal8008JJfederal
law8009NNlaw
.8010SENT.
They8011PPthey
had8012VHDhave
general8013JJgeneral
federal8014JJfederal
jurisdiction8015NNjurisdiction
,8016,,
just8017RBjust
like8018INlike
state8019NNstate
courts8020NNScourt
.8021SENT.
It8022PPit
...8023:...
it8024PPit
was8025VBDbe
exclusive8026JJexclusive
until8027INuntil
18758028CD@card@
.8029SENT.
So8030RBso
I8031PPI
think8032VVPthink
you8033PPyou
've8034VHPhave
got8035VVNget
to8036TOto
have8037VHhave
some8038DTsome
primary8039JJprimary
test8040NNtest
in8041INin
there8042RBthere
.8043SENT.
I8044PPI
think8045VVPthink
you8046PPyou
're8047VBPbe
going8048VVGgo
to8049TOto
have8050VHhave
difficult8051JJdifficult
cases8052NNScase
at8053INat
the8054DTthe
margins8055NNSmargin
.8056SENT.
And8057CCand
all8058RBall
I8059PPI
can8060MDcan
fall8061VVfall
back8062RBback
on8063INon
is8064VBZbe
this8065DTthis
is8066VBZbe
not8067RBnot
a8068DTa
difficult8069JJdifficult
case8070NNcase
because8071INbecause
,8072,,
here8073RBhere
,8074,,
there8075EXthere
's8076VBZbe
nothing8077NNnothing
in8078INin
PROMESA8079NPPROMESA
that8080WDTthat
needed8081VVDneed
to8082TOto
be8083VBbe
an8084DTan
exercise8085NNexercise
of8086INof
Article8087NPArticle
I8088PPI
.8089SENT.
By8090INby
its8091PP$its
terms8092NNSterm
,8093,,
it8094PPit
is8095VBZbe
limited8096VVNlimit
to8097TOto
the8098DTthe
territory8099NNterritory
.8100SENT.
It8101PPit
's8102VBZbe
not8103RBnot
as8104RBas
if8105INif
they8106PPthey
can8107MDcan
point8108VVpoint
you8109PPyou
to8110TOto
some8111DTsome
federal8112JJfederal
provisions8113NNSprovision
of8114INof
PROMESA8115NPPROMESA
that8116WDTthat
grant8117VVPgrant
the8118DTthe
federal8119JJfederal
power8120NNpower
that8121IN/thatthat
you8122PPyou
could8123MDcould
just8124RBjust
excise8125VVexcise
.8126SENT.
It8127PPit
says8128VVZsay
represent8129VVrepresent
the8130DTthe
Commonwealth8131NNcommonwealth
in8132INin
the8133DTthe
following8134VVGfollow
ways8135NNSway
.8136SENT.
And8137CCand
...8138:...
and8139CCand
I8140PPI
do8141VVPdo
...8142:...
I8143PPI
do8144VVPdo
...8145:...
and8146CCand
I8147PPI
think8148VVPthink
this8149DTthis
is8150VBZbe
the8151DTthe
best8152JJSgood
way8153NNway
to8154TOto
capture8155VVcapture
it8156PPit
.8157SENT.
Congress8158NPCongress
could8159MDcould
have8160VHhave
given8161VVNgive
these8162DTthese
powers8163NNSpower
to8164TOto
the8165DTthe
governor8166NNgovernor
and8167CCand
the8168DTthe
legislature8169NNlegislature
.8170SENT.
They8171PPthey
'd8172MDwould
already8173RBalready
...8174:...
they8175PPthey
already8176RBalready
had8177VHDhave
many8178JJmany
of8179INof
them8180PPthem
.8181SENT.
They8182PPthey
could8183MDcould
adjust8184VVadjust
debt8185NNdebt
.8186SENT.
They8187PPthey
could8188MDcould
propose8189VVpropose
budgets8190NNSbudget
and8191CCand
fiscal8192JJfiscal
plans8193NNSplan
.8194SENT.
The8195DTthe
governor8196NNgovernor
otherwise8197RBotherwise
would8198MDwould
have8199VHhave
represented8200VVNrepresent
the8201DTthe
Commonwealth8202NNcommonwealth
in8203INin
the8204DTthe
Title8205NPTitle
III8206NPIII
proceedings8207NNSproceeding
.8208SENT.
If8209INif
they8210PPthey
had8211VHDhave
created8212VVNcreate
the8213DTthe
Title8214NPTitle
III8215NPIII
proceeding8216NNproceeding
but8217CCbut
not8218RBnot
otherwise8219RBotherwise
specified8220VVNspecify
that8221IN/thatthat
the8222DTthe
Board8223NPBoard
would8224MDwould
play8225VVplay
a8226DTa
role8227NNrole
,8228,,
and8229CCand
the8230DTthe
governor8231NNgovernor
had8232VHDhave
filed8233VVNfile
this8234DTthis
petition8235NNpetition
,8236,,
I8237PPI
do8238VVPdo
n't8239RBn't
think8240VVthink
anyone8241NNanyone
believes8242VVZbelieve
that8243WDTthat
would8244MDwould
have8245VHhave
converted8246VVNconvert
the8247DTthe
governor8248NNgovernor
into8249INinto
a8250DTa
federal8251JJfederal
officer8252NNofficer
,8253,,
any8254DTany
more8255JJRmore
than8256INthan
the8257DTthe
mayor8258NNmayor
of8259INof
Detroit8260NPDetroit
or8261CCor
anybody8262NNanybody
else8263RBelse
.8264SENT.
To8265TOTo
say8266VVsay
just8267RBjust
a8268DTa
quick8269JJquick
word8270NNword
on8271INon
the8272DTthe
...8273:...
on8274INon
the8275DTthe
...8276:...
on8277INon
the8278DTthe
remedy8279NNremedy
.8280SENT.
As8281INas
we8282PPwe
tried8283VVDtry
to8284TOto
say8285VVsay
,8286,,
I8287PPI
think8288VVPthink
there8289EXthere
are8290VBPbe
two8291CDtwo
things8292NNSthing
at8293INat
play8294NNplay
,8295,,
the8296DTthe
de8297FWde
facto8298FWfacto
officer8299NNofficer
doctrine8300NNdoctrine
,8301,,
to8302TOto
ensure8303VVensure
you8304PPyou
have8305VHPhave
not8306RBnot
applied8307VVNapply
it8308PPit
to8309TOto
adjudicators8310NNSadjudicator
,8311,,
that8312WDTthat
's8313VBZbe
Ryder8314NPRyder
,8315,,
but8316CCbut
you8317PPyou
have8318VHPhave
more8319JJRmore
than8320INthan
a8321DTa
dozen8322NNdozen
cases8323NNScase
applying8324VVGapply
it8325PPit
to8326TOto
legislative8327JJlegislative
and8328CCand
executive8329JJexecutive
bodies8330NNSbody
,8331,,
that8332WDTthat
's8333VBZbe
Buckley8334NPBuckley
.8335SENT.
This8336DTthis
is8337VBZbe
an8338DTan
executive8339JJexecutive
body8340NNbody
that8341WDTthat
's8342VBZbe
not8343RBnot
doing8344VVGdo
adjudication8345NNadjudication
.8346SENT.
Right8347RBright
?8348SENT?
So8349RBso
I8350PPI
think8351VVPthink
it8352PPit
falls8353VVZfall
squarely8354RBsquarely
within8355INwithin
that8356DTthat
...8357:...
it8358PPit
...8359:...
that8360IN/thatthat
set8361VVNset
of8362INof
cases8363NNScase
.8364SENT.
And8365CCand
,8366,,
indeed8367RBindeed
,8368,,
I8369PPI
think8370VVPthink
it8371PPit
's8372VBZbe
sort8373NNsort
of8374INof
the8375DTthe
classic8376JJclassic
case8377NNcase
for8378INfor
that8379WDTthat
,8380,,
given8381VVNgive
the8382DTthe
immense8383JJimmense
reliance8384NNreliance
interests8385NNSinterest
that8386WDTthat
have8387VHPhave
been8388VBNbe
built8389VVNbuild
up8390RPup
on8391INon
the8392DTthe
Board8393NPBoard
over8394INover
the8395DTthe
next8396JJnext
three8397CDthree
years8398NNSyear
,8399,,
going8400VVGgo
forward8401RBforward
,8402,,
everybody8403NNeverybody
agrees8404VVZagree
we8405PPwe
need8406VVPneed
a8407DTa
stay8408NNstay
in8409INin
order8410NNorder
to8411TOto
confirm8412VVconfirm
a8413DTa
new8414JJnew
Board8415NPBoard
,8416,,
if8417INif
you8418PPyou
decide8419VVPdecide
we8420PPwe
're8421VBPbe
wrong8422JJwrong
on8423INon
the8424DTthe
merits8425NNSmerit
.8426SENT.
I8427PPI
think8428VVPthink
the8429DTthe
right8430JJright
model8431NNmodel
there8432EXthere
is8433VBZbe
Northern8434NPNorthern
Pipeline8435NPPipeline
.8436SENT.
That8437DTthat
was8438VBDbe
six8439CDsix
months8440NNSmonth
.8441SENT.
Same8442JJsame
thing8443NNthing
here8444RBhere
.8445SENT.
You8446PPyou
've8447VHPhave
got8448VVNget
to8449TOto
get8450VVget
them8451PPthem
out8452RPout
of8453INof
committee8454NNcommittee
.8455SENT.
You8456PPyou
've8457VHPhave
got8458VVNget
to8459TOto
get8460VVget
them8461PPthem
through8462INthrough
the8463DTthe
floor8464NNfloor
.8465SENT.
They8466PPthey
're8467VBPbe
going8468VVGgo
to8469TOto
have8470VHhave
to8471TOto
do8472VVdo
some8473DTsome
amount8474NNamount
of8475INof
ratification8476NNratification
.8477SENT.
And8478CCand
then8479RBthen
they8480PPthey
're8481VBPbe
going8482VVGgo
to8483TOto
have8484VHhave
to8485TOto
act8486VVact
going8487VVGgo
forward8488RBforward
.8489SENT.
At8490INat
a8491DTa
minimum8492NNminimum
,8493,,
though8494RBthough
,8495,,
I8496PPI
'd8497MDwould
say8498VVsay
we8499PPwe
need8500VVneed
three8501CDthree
months8502NNSmonth
with8503INwith
the8504DTthe
ability8505NNability
to8506TOto
come8507VVcome
back8508RBback
and8509CCand
report8510VVreport
progress8511NNprogress
just8512RBjust
like8513INlike
what8514WPwhat
we8515PPwe
did8516VVDdo
in8517INin
the8518DTthe
First8519NPFirst
Circuit8520NPCircuit
,8521,,
because8522INbecause
we8523PPwe
've8524VHPhave
got8525VVNget
to8526TOto
allow8527VVallow
Congress8528NPCongress
and8529CCand
then8530RBthen
the8531DTthe
Board8532NPBoard
some8533DTsome
time8534NNtime
to8535TOto
...8536:...
to8537TOto
act8538VVact
.8539SENT.
If8540INif
the8541DTthe
Board8542NPBoard
is8543VBZbe
shut8544VVNshut
down8545RPdown
in8546INin
Puerto8547NPPuerto
Rico8548NPRico
,8549,,
I8550PPI
do8551VVPdo
think8552VVthink
it8553PPit
imperils8554VVZimperil
a8555DTa
process8556NNprocess
on8557INon
which8558WDTwhich
we8559PPwe
have8560VHPhave
made8561VVNmake
really8562RBreally
substantial8563JJsubstantial
gains8564NNSgain
in8565INin
the8566DTthe
last8567JJlast
three8568CDthree
years8569NNSyear
in8570INin
trying8571VVGtry
to8572TOto
stabilize8573VVstabilize
the8574DTthe
island8575NNisland
's8576POS's
finances8577NNSfinance
.8578SENT.
And8579CCand
I8580PPI
can8581MDcan
't8582RB't
stress8583NNstress
to8584TOto
the8585DTthe
Court8586NPCourt
how8587WRBhow
important8588JJimportant
it8589PPit
is8590VBZbe
that8591IN/thatthat
the8592DTthe
Board8593NPBoard
be8594VBbe
allowed8595VVNallow
to8596TOto
continue8597VVcontinue
to8598TOto
do8599VVdo
that8600DTthat
work8601NNwork
.8602SENT.
Thank8603VVthank
you8604PPyou
.8605SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]8606LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank8607VVthank
you8608PPyou
,8609,,
General8610NPGeneral
.8611SENT.
Mr8612NPMr
.8613SENT.
Olson8614NPOlson
.8615SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]8616LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Thank8617VVthank
you8618PPyou
,8619,,
Mr8620NPMr
.8621SENT.
Chief8622NPChief
Justice8623NPJustice
,8624,,
and8625CCand
may8626MDmay
it8627PPit
please8628VVplease
the8629DTthe
Court8630NPCourt
:8631::
In8632INin
Federalist8633NPFederalist
488634CD@card@
,8635,,
James8636NPJames
Madison8637NPMadison
anticipated8638VVNanticipate
what8639WPwhat
Congress8640NPCongress
attempted8641VVDattempt
to8642TOto
do8643VVdo
with8644INwith
the8645DTthe
PROMESA8646NPPROMESA
oversight8647NNoversight
board8648NNboard
,8649,,
masking8650VVGmask
under8651INunder
complicated8652JJcomplicated
and8653CCand
indirect8654JJindirect
measures8655NNSmeasure
its8656PP$its
encroachment8657NNencroachment
on8658INon
coordinate8659JJcoordinate
departments8660NNSdepartment
.8661SENT.
Drawing8662VVGdraw
all8663DTall
power8664NNpower
into8665INinto
its8666PP$its
impetuous8667JJimpetuous
vortex8668NNvortex
,8669,,
he8670PPhe
urged8671VVDurge
all8672DTall
precautions8673NNSprecaution
against8674INagainst
the8675DTthe
enterprising8676JJenterprising
ambition8677NNambition
of8678INof
this8679DTthis
department8680NNdepartment
.8681SENT.
PROMESA8682NPPROMESA
was8683VBDbe
a8684DTa
response8685NNresponse
to8686TOto
a8687DTa
national8688JJnational
financial8689JJfinancial
crisis8690NNcrisis
affecting8691VVGaffect
millions8692NNSmillion
of8693INof
American8694JJAmerican
citizens8695NNScitizen
,8696,,
including8697VVGinclude
38698CD3
million8699CDmillion
citizens8700NNScitizen
,8701,,
American8702JJAmerican
citizens8703NNScitizen
,8704,,
in8705INin
Puerto8706NPPuerto
Rico8707NPRico
.8708SENT.
The8709DTthe
PROMESA8710NPPROMESA
Board8711NPBoard
is8712VBZbe
appointed8713VVNappoint
,8714,,
supervised8715VVNsupervise
,8716,,
and8717CCand
removable8718JJremovable
by8719INby
the8720DTthe
President8721NPPresident
of8722INof
the8723DTthe
United8724NPUnited
States8725NPSStates
,8726,,
reports8727VVZreport
regularly8728RBregularly
on8729INon
its8730PP$its
budget8731NNbudget
and8732CCand
decisions8733NNSdecision
to8734TOto
federal8735JJfederal
officials8736NNSofficial
,8737,,
and8738CCand
makes8739VVZmake
recommendations8740NNSrecommendation
...8741:...
it8742PPit
's8743VBZbe
required8744VVNrequire
to8745TOto
do8746VVdo
so8747RBso
under8748INunder
the8749DTthe
statute8750NNstatute
...8751:...
for8752INfor
changes8753NNSchange
in8754INin
PROMESA8755NPPROMESA
and8756CCand
other8757JJother
federal8758JJfederal
laws8759NNSlaw
...8760:...
other8761JJother
federal8762JJfederal
laws8763NNSlaw
.8764SENT.
It8765PPit
presides8766VVZpreside
over8767INover
the8768DTthe
largest8769JJSlarge
municipal8770JJmunicipal
bankruptcy8771NNbankruptcy
proceeding8772NNproceeding
in8773INin
United8774NPUnited
States8775NPSStates
history8776NNhistory
,8777,,
managing8778VVGmanage
over8779INover
1008780CD@card@
billion8781CDbillion
dollars8782NNSdollar
in8783INin
indebtedness8784NNindebtedness
,8785,,
165,0008786CD@card@
claims8787NNSclaim
,8788,,
including8789VVGinclude
over8790INover
2008791CD@card@
claw-back8792NNclaw-back
actions8793NNSaction
,8794,,
lawsuits8795NNSlawsuit
against8796INagainst
major8797JJmajor
financial8798JJfinancial
institutions8799NNSinstitution
,8800,,
in8801INin
a8802DTa
proceeding8803NNproceeding
in8804INin
an8805DTan
Article8806NPArticle
III8807NPIII
district8808NNdistrict
court8809NNcourt
designated8810VVNdesignate
by8811INby
the8812DTthe
Chief8813NPChief
Justice8814NPJustice
of8815INof
the8816DTthe
United8817NPUnited
States8818NPSStates
.8819SENT.
The8820DTthe
Board8821NPBoard
was8822VBDbe
effectively8823RBeffectively
chosen8824VVNchoose
...8825:...
these8826DTthese
are8827VBPbe
the8828DTthe
words8829NNSword
of8830INof
the8831DTthe
congressional8832JJcongressional
committee8833NNcommittee
...8834:...
effectively8835RBeffectively
chosen8836VVNchoose
by8837INby
members8838NNSmember
of8839INof
Congress8840NPCongress
,8841,,
all8842DTall
without8843INwithout
the8844DTthe
advice8845NNadvice
and8846CCand
consent8847NNconsent
of8848INof
the8849DTthe
Senate8850NPSenate
.8851SENT.
The8852DTthe
Appointments8853NNSappointment
Clause8854NNclause
is8855VBZbe
central8856JJcentral
to8857TOto
the8858DTthe
separation8859NNseparation
of8860INof
powers8861NNSpower
,8862,,
without8863INwithout
which8864WDTwhich
,8865,,
in8866INin
the8867DTthe
words8868NNSword
of8869INof
the8870DTthe
framers8871NNSframer
,8872,,
we8873PPwe
have8874VHPhave
the8875DTthe
very8876JJvery
definition8877NNdefinition
of8878INof
tyranny8879NNtyranny
.8880SENT.
It8881PPit
was8882VBDbe
a8883DTa
response8884NNresponse
to8885TOto
the8886DTthe
most8887RBSmost
insidious8888JJinsidious
and8889CCand
powerful8890JJpowerful
weapon8891NNweapon
of8892INof
18th-century8893JJ18th-century
despots8894NNSdespot
.8895SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8896LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
If8897INif
the8898DTthe
Board8899NPBoard
were8900VBDbe
elected8901VVNelect
,8902,,
would8903MDwould
it8904PPit
be8905VBbe
constitutional8906JJconstitutional
?8907SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]8908LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
No8909NPNo
,8910,,
it8911PPit
would8912MDwould
not8913RBnot
be8914VBbe
constitutional8915JJconstitutional
because8916INbecause
...8917:...
how8918WRBhow
...8919:...
and8920CCand
...8921:...
and8922CCand
...8923:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8924LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Does8925VVZdo
n't8926RBn't
that8927WDTthat
mean8928VVPmean
the8929DTthe
Puerto8930NPPuerto
Rico8931NPRico
governor8932NNgovernor
election8933NNelection
is8934VBZbe
unconstitutional8935JJunconstitutional
as8936RBas
well8937RBwell
then8938RBthen
?8939SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]8940LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
No8941NPNo
,8942,,
because8943INbecause
the8944DTthe
Puerto8945NPPuerto
Rican8946JJRican
authorities8947NNSauthority
that8948WDTthat
are8949VBPbe
given8950VVNgive
to8951TOto
the8952DTthe
Puerto8953NPPuerto
Rican8954JJRican
governor8955NNgovernor
and8956CCand
under8957INunder
the8958DTthe
Puerto8959NPPuerto
Rican8960JJRican
legislature8961NNlegislature
are8962VBPbe
primarily8963RBprimarily
local8964JJlocal
activities8965NNSactivity
.8966SENT.
I8967PPI
just8968RBjust
described8969VVDdescribe
what8970WPwhat
the8971DTthe
PROMESA8972NPPROMESA
's8973POS's
Board8974NPBoard
powers8975NNSpower
are8976VBPbe
.8977SENT.
They8978PPthey
are8979VBPbe
national8980JJnational
in8981INin
scope8982NNscope
.8983SENT.
They8984PPthey
bring8985VVPbring
cases8986NNScase
in8987INin
federal8988JJfederal
court8989NNcourt
against8990INagainst
U8991NPU
.8992SENT.
S8993NPS
.8994SENT.
citizens8995NNScitizen
.8996SENT.
They8997PPthey
conduct8998VVPconduct
an8999DTan
extensive9000JJextensive
investigation9001NNinvestigation
of9002INof
the9003DTthe
oversight9004NNoversight
...9005:...
over9006INover
the9007DTthe
underwriting9008NNunderwriting
practices9009NNSpractice
,9010,,
the9011DTthe
bond9012NNbond
rating9013NNrating
situation9014NNsituation
with9015INwith
respect9016NNrespect
to9017TOto
this9018DTthis
...9019:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9020LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
All9021NPAll
on9022INon
behalf9023NNbehalf
of9024INof
Puerto9025NPPuerto
Rico9026NPRico
and9027CCand
its9028PP$its
people9029NNSpeople
and9030CCand
its9031PP$its
agencies9032NNSagency
.9033SENT.
The9034DTthe
Board9035NPBoard
is9036VBZbe
instructed9037VVNinstruct
to9038TOto
act9039VVact
not9040RBnot
on9041INon
behalf9042NNbehalf
of9043INof
the9044DTthe
United9045NPUnited
States9046NPSStates
but9047CCbut
on9048INon
behalf9049NNbehalf
of9050INof
Puerto9051NPPuerto
Rico9052NPRico
in9053INin
pressing9054VVGpress
these9055DTthese
claims9056NNSclaim
?9057SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]9058LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Justice9059NPJustice
Ginsburg9060NPGinsburg
,9061,,
it9062PPit
is9063VBZbe
not9064RBnot
on9065INon
behalf9066NNbehalf
of9067INof
Puerto9068NPPuerto
Rico9069NPRico
.9070SENT.
It9071PPit
is9072VBZbe
not9073RBnot
an9074DTan
internal9075JJinternal
Puerto9076NPPuerto
Rican9077JJRican
operation9078NNoperation
.9079SENT.
It9080PPit
is9081VBZbe
an9082DTan
oversight9083NNoversight
board9084NNboard
.9085SENT.
This9086DTthis
Board9087NPBoard
has9088VHZhave
the9089DTthe
power9090NNpower
to9091TOto
prescribe9092VVprescribe
a9093DTa
budget9094NNbudget
for9095INfor
Puerto9096NPPuerto
Rico9097NPRico
.9098SENT.
It9099PPit
has9100VHZhave
the9101DTthe
power9102NNpower
to9103TOto
veto9104VVveto
decisions9105NNSdecision
of9106INof
the9107DTthe
governor9108NNgovernor
of9109INof
Puerto9110NPPuerto
Rico9111NPRico
and9112CCand
the9113DTthe
legislature9114NNlegislature
of9115INof
Puerto9116NPPuerto
Rico9117NPRico
.9118SENT.
It9119PPit
has9120VHZhave
the9121DTthe
power9122NNpower
and9123CCand
has9124VHZhave
sued9125VVNsue
the9126DTthe
governor9127NNgovernor
of9128INof
Puerto9129NPPuerto
Rico9130NPRico
and9131CCand
government9132NNgovernment
...9133:...
Puerto9134NPPuerto
Rican9135NPRican
officials9136NNSofficial
.9137SENT.
It9138PPit
's9139VHZhave
called9140VVNcall
an9141DTan
oversight9142NNoversight
board9143NNboard
because9144INbecause
it9145PPit
is9146VBZbe
not9147RBnot
internal9148JJinternal
to9149TOto
Puerto9150NPPuerto
Rico9151NPRico
.9152SENT.
It9153PPit
...9154:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9155LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well9156UHWell
,9157,,
but9158CCbut
its9159PP$its
oversight9160NNoversight
concerns9161NNSconcern
...9162:...
every9163DTevery
sentence9164NNsentence
you9165PPyou
just9166RBjust
said9167VVDsay
there9168RBthere
,9169,,
it9170PPit
's9171VBZbe
of9172INof
Puerto9173NPPuerto
Rico9174NPRico
,9175,,
of9176INof
Puerto9177NPPuerto
Rico9178NPRico
.9179SENT.
Its9180PP$its
focus9181NNfocus
is9182VBZbe
on9183INon
Puerto9184NPPuerto
Rico9185NPRico
.9186SENT.
Yes9187UHyes
,9188,,
the9189DTthe
activities9190NNSactivity
,9191,,
as9192INas
things9193NNSthing
in9194INin
any9195DTany
of9196INof
the9197DTthe
territories9198NNSterritory
often9199RBoften
do9200VVPdo
,9201,,
has9202VHZhave
broader9203JJRbroad
impact9204NNimpact
.9205SENT.
I9206PPI
get9207VVPget
...9208:...
I9209PPI
'll9210MDwill
get9211VVget
back9212RBback
to9213TOto
the9214DTthe
question9215NNquestion
I9216PPI
asked9217VVDask
your9218PP$your
friend9219NNfriend
,9220,,
Mr9221NPMr
.9222SENT.
Verrilli9223NPVerrilli
.9224SENT.
What9225WPWhat
if9226INif
we9227PPwe
...9228:...
I9229PPI
mean9230VVPmean
,9231,,
I9232PPI
think9233VVPthink
it9234PPit
's9235VBZbe
very9236RBvery
artificial9237JJartificial
to9238TOto
look9239VVlook
at9240INat
this9241DTthis
and9242CCand
say9243VVPsay
,9244,,
is9245VBZbe
this9246DTthis
local9247JJlocal
or9248CCor
is9249VBZbe
this9250DTthis
national9251JJnational
?9252SENT?
It9253PPit
obviously9254RBobviously
is9255VBZbe
some9256DTsome
of9257INof
each9258DTeach
,9259,,
or9260CCor
even9261RBeven
the9262DTthe
local9263JJlocal
aspects9264NNSaspect
certainly9265RBcertainly
have9266VHPhave
national9267JJnational
implications9268NNSimplication
.9269SENT.
So9270RBso
,9271,,
again9272RBagain
,9273,,
I9274PPI
mean9275VVPmean
,9276,,
where9277WRBwhere
...9278:...
where9279WRBwhere
do9280VVPdo
we9281PPwe
...9282:...
I9283PPI
know9284VVPknow
what9285WPwhat
your9286PP$your
answer9287NNanswer
is9288VBZbe
,9289,,
but9290CCbut
you9291PPyou
could9292MDcould
explain9293VVexplain
it9294PPit
.9295SENT.
What9296WPWhat
do9297VVPdo
you9298PPyou
do9299VVPdo
with9300INwith
...9301:...
what9302WPwhat
...9303:...
what9304WPwhat
do9305VVPdo
I9306PPI
do9307VVPdo
if9308INif
I9309PPI
view9310VVPview
it9311PPit
as9312INas
some9313DTsome
of9314INof
each9315DTeach
?9316SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]9317LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well9318UHwell
,9319,,
it9320PPit
is9321VBZbe
overwhelmingly9322RBoverwhelmingly
a9323DTa
federal9324JJfederal
problem9325NNproblem
dealing9326VVGdeal
with9327INwith
a9328DTa
federal9329JJfederal
issue9330NNissue
.9331SENT.
In9332INin
the9333DTthe
...9334:...
in9335INin
the9336DTthe
Limtiaco9337NPLimtiaco
case9338NNcase
just9339RBjust
in9340INin
20079341CD@card@
,9342,,
with9343INwith
an9344DTan
issue9345NNissue
involving9346VVGinvolve
insolvency9347NNinsolvency
or9348CCor
potential9349JJpotential
insolvency9350NNinsolvency
of9351INof
Guam9352NPGuam
,9353,,
this9354DTthis
Court9355NPCourt
said9356VVDsay
this9357DTthis
is9358VBZbe
not9359RBnot
a9360DTa
local9361JJlocal
problem9362NNproblem
.9363SENT.
This9364DTthis
is9365VBZbe
the9366DTthe
...9367:...
the9368DTthe
insolvency9369NNinsolvency
of9370INof
a9371DTa
territory9372NNterritory
is9373VBZbe
a9374DTa
national9375JJnational
...9376:...
is9377VBZbe
a9378DTa
national9379JJnational
issue9380NNissue
.9381SENT.
It9382PPit
's9383VBZbe
a9384DTa
federal9385JJfederal
issue9386NNissue
.9387SENT.
The9388DTthe
concern9389NNconcern
of9390INof
the9391DTthe
United9392NPUnited
States9393NPSStates
...9394:...
this9395DTthis
is9396VBZbe
in9397INin
a9398DTa
sense9399NNsense
a9400DTa
little9401JJlittle
bit9402NNbit
like9403INlike
the9404DTthe
Lebron9405NPLebron
case9406NNcase
or9407CCor
other9408JJother
cases9409NNScase
where9410WRBwhere
this9411DTthis
Court9412NPCourt
has9413VHZhave
said9414VVNsay
the9415DTthe
Congress9416NPCongress
is9417VBZbe
dealing9418VVGdeal
with9419INwith
a9420DTa
significant9421JJsignificant
federal9422JJfederal
problem9423NNproblem
.9424SENT.
It9425PPit
has9426VHZhave
come9427VVNcome
up9428RPup
with9429INwith
a9430DTa
federal9431JJfederal
solution9432NNsolution
and9433CCand
has9434VHZhave
given9435VVNgive
this9436DTthis
Board9437NPBoard
powers9438NNSpower
over9439INover
citizens9440NNScitizen
all9441RBall
over9442INover
the9443DTthe
United9444NPUnited
States9445NPSStates
.9446SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9447LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But9448CCbut
I9449PPI
think9450VVPthink
the9451DTthe
response9452NNresponse
on9453INon
the9454DTthe
other9455JJother
side9456NNside
is9457VBZbe
that9458IN/thatthat
they9459PPthey
've9460VHPhave
taken9461VVNtake
some9462DTsome
of9463INof
the9464DTthe
powers9465NNSpower
and9466CCand
responsibilities9467NNSresponsibility
that9468WDTthat
belonged9469VVDbelong
to9470TOto
the9471DTthe
governor9472NNgovernor
and9473CCand
to9474TOto
the9475DTthe
legislature9476NNlegislature
and9477CCand
given9478VVNgive
them9479PPthem
to9480TOto
the9481DTthe
Board9482NPBoard
,9483,,
and9484CCand
the9485DTthe
governor9486NNgovernor
,9487,,
as9488INas
you9489PPyou
acknowledged9490VVDacknowledge
,9491,,
is9492VBZbe
elected9493VVNelect
,9494,,
not9495RBnot
appointed9496VVNappoint
consistent9497JJconsistent
with9498INwith
the9499DTthe
Appointments9500NNSappointment
Clause9501NNclause
.9502SENT.
So9503RBso
is9504VBZbe
that9505RBthat
wrong9506JJwrong
that9507IN/thatthat
they9508PPthey
've9509VHPhave
taken9510VVNtake
the9511DTthe
powers9512NNSpower
from9513INfrom
the9514DTthe
governor9515NNgovernor
and9516CCand
legislature9517NNlegislature
and9518CCand
given9519VVNgive
them9520PPthem
to9521TOto
the9522DTthe
Board9523NPBoard
?9524SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]9525LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
They9526PPthey
've9527VHPhave
taken9528VVNtake
all9529RBall
of9530INof
the9531DTthe
powers9532NNSpower
with9533INwith
respect9534NNrespect
to9535TOto
the9536DTthe
financial9537JJfinancial
situation9538NNsituation
in9539INin
Puerto9540NPPuerto
Rico9541NPRico
and9542CCand
given9543VVNgive
it9544PPit
to9545TOto
the9546DTthe
federal-created9547JJfederal-created
Board9548NPBoard
,9549,,
which9550WDTwhich
is9551VBZbe
appointed9552VVNappoint
by9553INby
the9554DTthe
President9555NPPresident
,9556,,
removable9557JJremovable
by9558INby
the9559DTthe
President9560NPPresident
,9561,,
and9562CCand
has9563VHZhave
supervisorial9564JJsupervisorial
authorities9565NNSauthority
under9566INunder
the9567DTthe
...9568:...
the9569DTthe
very9570JJvery
statute9571NNstatute
...9572:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9573LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
But9574CCbut
,9575,,
Mr9576NPMr
.9577SENT.
Olson9578NPOlson
,9579,,
I9580PPI
...9581:...
I9582PPI
think9583VVPthink
the9584DTthe
question9585NNquestion
is9586VBZbe
...9587:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]9588LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Mr9589NPMr
.9590SENT.
Olson9591NPOlson
...9592:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9593LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...9594:...
if9595INif
,9596,,
but9597CCbut
for9598INfor
this9599DTthis
statute9600NNstatute
...9601:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9602LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Right9603NPRight
.9604SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9605LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...9606:...
who9607WPwho
would9608MDwould
...9609:...
who9610WPwho
would9611MDwould
be9612VBbe
doing9613VVGdo
these9614DTthese
activities9615NNSactivity
?9616SENT?
And9617CCand
if9618INif
it9619PPit
would9620MDwould
be9621VBbe
the9622DTthe
governor9623NNgovernor
of9624INof
Puerto9625NPPuerto
Rico9626NPRico
...9627:...
[MR. OLSON T.]9628LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The9629DTthe
governor9630NNgovernor
...9631:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9632LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...9633:...
then9634RBthen
does9635VVZdo
n't9636RBn't
that9637WDTthat
tell9638VVPtell
us9639PPus
something9640NNsomething
?9641SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]9642LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The9643DTthe
governor9644NNgovernor
of9645INof
Puerto9646NPPuerto
Rico9647NPRico
does9648VVZdo
not9649RBnot
have9650VHhave
the9651DTthe
power9652NNpower
to9653TOto
do9654VVdo
these9655DTthese
activities9656NNSactivity
.9657SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9658LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I9659PPI
understand9660VVPunderstand
that9661RBthat
.9662SENT.
But9663CCbut
for9664INfor
this9665DTthis
statute9666NNstatute
,9667,,
who9668WPwho
would9669MDwould
?9670SENT?
Would9671MDwould
n't9672RBn't
it9673PPit
be9674VBbe
the9675DTthe
governor9676NNgovernor
?9677SENT?
That9678DTthat
's9679VBZbe
what9680WPwhat
...9681:...
[MR. OLSON T.]9682LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
No9683NPNo
.9684SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9685LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...9686:...
that9687WDTthat
's9688VBZbe
what9689WPwhat
your9690PP$your
colleagues9691NNScolleague
...9692:...
[MR. OLSON T.]9693LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
But9694CCbut
for9695INfor
the9696DTthe
statute9697NNstatute
,9698,,
this9699DTthis
authority9700NNauthority
to9701TOto
do9702VVdo
...9703:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9704LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
That9705DTthat
's9706VBZbe
what9707WPwhat
your9708PP$your
colleagues9709NNScolleague
suggest9710VVPsuggest
.9711SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]9712LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well9713UHWell
...9714:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]9715LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
And9716CCand
is9717VBZbe
...9718:...
if9719INif
that9720WDTthat
's9721VBZbe
erroneous9722JJerroneous
,9723,,
could9724MDcould
you9725PPyou
direct9726VVdirect
us9727PPus
to9728TOto
what9729WPwhat
...9730:...
who9731WPwho
would9732MDwould
do9733VVdo
it9734PPit
but9735CCbut
for9736INfor
the9737DTthe
statute9738NNstatute
?9739SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]9740LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The9741DTthe
statute9742NNstatute
was9743VBDbe
created9744VVNcreate
because9745INbecause
the9746DTthe
...9747:...
the9748DTthe
governor9749NNgovernor
of9750INof
Puerto9751NPPuerto
Rico9752NPRico
...9753:...
and9754CCand
there9755EXthere
was9756VBDbe
no9757DTno
authority9758NNauthority
for9759INfor
officials9760NNSofficial
in9761INin
Puerto9762NPPuerto
Rico9763NPRico
to9764TOto
do9765VVdo
these9766DTthese
responsibilities9767NNSresponsibility
,9768,,
to9769TOto
bring9770VVbring
these9771DTthese
actions9772NNSaction
...9773:...
these9774DTthese
actions9775NNSaction
against9776INagainst
financial9777JJfinancial
institutions9778NNSinstitution
in9779INin
the9780DTthe
mainland9781NNmainland
,9782,,
to9783TOto
bring9784VVbring
...9785:...
to9786TOto
overturn9787VVoverturn
the9788DTthe
budget9789NNbudget
,9790,,
to9791TOto
do9792VVdo
these9793DTthese
various9794JJvarious
things9795NNSthing
,9796,,
to9797TOto
bring9798VVbring
suit9799NNsuit
against9800INagainst
the9801DTthe
governor9802NNgovernor
himself9803PPhimself
.9804SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9805LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Why9806WRBwhy
could9807MDcould
n't9808RBn't
they9809PPthey
?9810SENT?
Why9811WRBwhy
could9812MDcould
n't9813RBn't
they9814PPthey
?9815SENT?
They9816PPthey
'd9817MDwould
pass9818VVpass
a9819DTa
law9820NNlaw
,9821,,
a9822DTa
Puerto9823NPPuerto
Rican9824JJRican
law9825NNlaw
,9826,,
which9827WDTwhich
would9828MDwould
give9829VVgive
them9830PPthem
authority9831NNauthority
to9832TOto
do9833VVdo
it9834PPit
.9835SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]9836LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
They9837PPthey
...9838:...
they9839PPthey
would9840MDwould
not9841RBnot
have9842VHhave
the9843DTthe
power9844NNpower
to9845TOto
have9846VHhave
the9847DTthe
reach9848NNreach
that9849IN/thatthat
this9850DTthis
PROMESA9851NPPROMESA
...9852:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9853LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
What9854WPWhat
?9855SENT?
Give9856VVgive
me9857PPme
an9858DTan
example9859NNexample
.9860SENT.
I9861PPI
mean9862VVPmean
,9863,,
if9864INif
the9865DTthe
legislature9866NNlegislature
and9867CCand
governor9868NNgovernor
wanted9869VVDwant
to9870TOto
do9871VVdo
it9872PPit
,9873,,
they9874PPthey
would9875MDwould
pass9876VVpass
a9877DTa
law9878NNlaw
.9879SENT.
They9880PPthey
would9881MDwould
represent9882VVrepresent
Puerto9883NPPuerto
Rico9884NPRico
in9885INin
the9886DTthe
bankruptcy9887NNbankruptcy
proceeding9888NNproceeding
.9889SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]9890LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well9891UHWell
...9892:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9893LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
They9894PPthey
would9895MDwould
...9896:...
they9897PPthey
would9898MDwould
take9899VVtake
care9900NNcare
of9901INof
the9902DTthe
problem9903NNproblem
.9904SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]9905LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
That9906DTthat
case9907NNcase
was9908VBDbe
before9909INbefore
this9910DTthis
Court9911NPCourt
just9912RBjust
a9913DTa
couple9914NNcouple
of9915INof
years9916NNSyear
ago9917RBago
.9918SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9919LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Right9920NPRight
.9921SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]9922LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The9923NPThe
...9924:...
the9925DTthe
case9926NNcase
involving9927VVGinvolve
whether9928INwhether
or9929CCor
not9930RBnot
Puerto9931NPPuerto
Rico9932NPRico
could9933MDcould
use9934VVuse
the9935DTthe
bankruptcy9936NNbankruptcy
statutes9937NNSstatute
to9938TOto
do9939VVdo
...9940:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9941LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No9942UHNo
,9943,,
no9944UHno
,9945,,
no9946UHno
,9947,,
I9948PPI
'm9949VBPbe
saying9950VVGsay
we9951PPwe
set9952VVDset
up9953RPup
a9954DTa
...9955:...
what9956WPwhat
I9957PPI
think9958VVPthink
you9959PPyou
're9960VBPbe
being9961VBGbe
asked9962VVNask
by9963INby
several9964JJseveral
of9965INof
us9966PPus
is9967VBZbe
:9968::
Look9969VVlook
at9970INat
all9971PDTall
the9972DTthe
powers9973NNSpower
that9974IN/thatthat
the9975DTthe
...9976:...
that9977IN/thatthat
the9978DTthe
Board9979NPBoard
has9980VHZhave
.9981SENT.
Are9982VBPbe
n't9983RBn't
they9984PPthey
powers9985VVZpower
that9986IN/thatthat
the9987DTthe
Puerto9988NPPuerto
Rican9989JJRican
government9990NNgovernment
could9991MDcould
exercise9992VVexercise
if9993INif
it9994PPit
had9995VHDhave
the9996DTthe
legislative9997JJlegislative
and9998CCand
gubernatorial9999JJgubernatorial
will10000NNwill
?10001SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10002LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
I10003PPI
submit10004VVPsubmit
...10005:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]10006LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Which10007WDTwhich
one10008PPone
could10009MDcould
n't10010RBn't
it10011PPit
?10012SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10013LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
I10014PPI
think10015VVPthink
virtually10016RBvirtually
all10017RBall
of10018INof
them10019PPthem
,10020,,
Justice10021NPJustice
Breyer10022NPBreyer
.10023SENT.
This10024DTthis
is10025VBZbe
a10026DTa
long10027JJlong
statute10028NNstatute
prescribing10029VVGprescribe
an10030DTan
enormous10031JJenormous
range10032NNrange
of10033INof
powers10034NNSpower
,10035,,
given10036VVNgive
the10037DTthe
ability10038NNability
to10039TOto
overturn10040VVoverturn
decisions10041NNSdecision
of10042INof
the10043DTthe
governor10044NNgovernor
,10045,,
to10046TOto
reverse10047VVreverse
...10048:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]10049LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
You10050PPyou
know10051VVPknow
,10052,,
I10053PPI
understand10054VVPunderstand
that10055IN/thatthat
,10056,,
but10057CCbut
I10058PPI
do10059VVPdo
n't10060RBn't
want10061VVwant
to10062TOto
repeat10063VVrepeat
my10064PP$my
question10065NNquestion
.10066SENT.
You10067PPyou
see10068VVPsee
what10069WPwhat
my10070PP$my
question10071NNquestion
was10072VBDbe
?10073SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10074LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
I10075PPI
do10076VVPdo
see10077VVsee
what10078WPwhat
your10079PP$your
...10080:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10081LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Mr10082NPMr
.10083SENT.
Olson10084NPOlson
,10085,,
I10086PPI
think10087VVPthink
the10088DTthe
basic10089JJbasic
question10090NNquestion
,10091,,
if10092INif
I10093PPI
can10094MDcan
simplify10095VVsimplify
it10096PPit
,10097,,
I10098PPI
believe10099VVPbelieve
,10100,,
is10101VBZbe
could10102MDcould
n't10103RBn't
the10104DTthe
governor10105NNgovernor
of10106INof
Puerto10107NPPuerto
Rico10108NPRico
and10109CCand
the10110DTthe
legislature10111NNlegislature
have10112VHPhave
created10113VVNcreate
their10114PP$their
own10115JJown
fiscal10116JJfiscal
rescue10117NNrescue
plan10118NNplan
?10119SENT?
Yes10120UHyes
.10121SENT.
Correct10122JJcorrect
?10123SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10124LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
No10125NPNo
,10126,,
I10127PPI
do10128VVPdo
n't10129RBn't
believe10130VVbelieve
so10131RBso
.10132SENT.
I10133PPI
think10134VVPthink
...10135:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10136LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Why10137WRBwhy
?10138SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10139LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...10140:...
that10141WDTthat
was10142VBDbe
the10143DTthe
case10144NNcase
that10145WDTthat
would10146MDwould
give10147VVgive
the10148DTthe
authority10149NNauthority
to10150TOto
adjust10151VVadjust
debts10152NNSdebt
,10153,,
to10154TOto
accommodate10155VVaccommodate
the10156DTthe
various10157JJvarious
different10158JJdifferent
creditors10159NNScreditor
,10160,,
to10161TOto
...10162:...
to10163TOto
...10164:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10165LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Oh10166UHoh
,10167,,
you10168PPyou
're10169VBPbe
talking10170VVGtalk
about10171RBabout
...10172:...
we10173PPwe
are10174VBPbe
...10175:...
okay10176JJokay
.10177SENT.
I10178PPI
guess10179VVPguess
your10180PP$your
intention10181NNintention
is10182VBZbe
that10183IN/thatthat
without10184INwithout
PROMESA10185NPPROMESA
,10186,,
the10187DTthe
bankruptcy10188NNbankruptcy
law10189NNlaw
would10190MDwould
n't10191RBn't
have10192VHhave
changed10193VVNchange
to10194TOto
permit10195VVpermit
Puerto10196NPPuerto
Rico10197NPRico
...10198:...
[MR. OLSON T.]10199LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
It10200PPit
...10201:...
it10202PPit
would10203MDwould
...10204:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10205LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...10206:...
to10207TOto
file10208VVfile
...10209:...
[MR. OLSON T.]10210LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...10211:...
it10212PPit
would10213MDwould
not10214RBnot
.10215SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10216LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...10217:...
its10218PP$its
action10219NNaction
...10220:...
[MR. OLSON T.]10221LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
And10222CCand
this10223DTthis
statute10224NNstatute
...10225:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10226LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...10227:...
so10228RBso
...10229:...
[MR. OLSON T.]10230LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...10231:...
went10232VVDgo
far10233RBfar
beyond10234INbeyond
the10235DTthe
bankruptcy10236NNbankruptcy
powers10237NNSpower
.10238SENT.
The10239DTthe
powers10240NNSpower
that10241WDTthat
are10242VBPbe
given10243VVNgive
to10244TOto
this10245DTthis
Board10246NPBoard
are10247VBPbe
vastly10248RBvastly
greater10249JJRgreat
than10250INthan
powers10251NNSpower
that10252WDTthat
are10253VBPbe
available10254JJavailable
on10255INon
the10256DTthe
...10257:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]10258LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Mr10259NPMr
.10260SENT.
Olson10261NPOlson
...10262:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10263LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So10264INso
what10265WPwhat
you10266PPyou
're10267VBPbe
basically10268RBbasically
saying10269VVGsay
is10270VBZbe
,10271,,
without10272INwithout
this10273DTthis
federal10274JJfederal
law10275NNlaw
creating10276VVGcreate
the10277DTthe
structure10278NNstructure
,10279,,
the10280DTthe
structure10281NNstructure
itself10282PPitself
could10283MDcould
n't10284RBn't
exist10285VVexist
under10286INunder
existing10287VVGexist
law10288NNlaw
?10289SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10290LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
That10291DTthat
's10292VBZbe
correct10293JJcorrect
.10294SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]10295LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Justice10296NPJustice
Alito10297NPAlito
.10298SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10299LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So10300INso
the10301DTthe
legislature10302NNlegislature
could10303MDcould
n't10304RBn't
do10305VVdo
it10306PPit
?10307SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10308LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
That10309DTthat
's10310VBZbe
correct10311JJcorrect
.10312SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]10313LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Mr10314NPMr
.10315SENT.
Olson10316NPOlson
,10317,,
are10318VBPbe
you10319PPyou
and10320CCand
your10321PP$your
client10322NNclient
here10323RBhere
just10324RBjust
to10325TOto
defend10326VVdefend
the10327DTthe
integrity10328NNintegrity
of10329INof
the10330DTthe
Constitution10331NPConstitution
,10332,,
or10333CCor
would10334MDwould
one10335PPone
be10336VBbe
excessively10337RBexcessively
cynical10338JJcynical
to10339TOto
think10340VVthink
that10341DTthat
something10342NNsomething
else10343RBelse
is10344VBZbe
involved10345VVNinvolve
here10346RBhere
involving10347VVGinvolve
money10348NNmoney
?10349SENT?
And10350CCand
,10351,,
if10352INif
so10353RBso
,10354,,
what10355WPwhat
is10356VBZbe
it10357PPit
?10358SENT?
What10359WPWhat
did10360VVDdo
the10361DTthe
Board10362NPBoard
do10363VVPdo
that10364IN/thatthat
hurt10365VVNhurt
your10366PP$your
client10367NNclient
?10368SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10369LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well10370UHWell
,10371,,
with10372INwith
...10373:...
my10374PP$my
...10375:...
aside10376RBaside
from10377INfrom
the10378DTthe
constitutional10379JJconstitutional
right10380NNright
to10381TOto
an10382DTan
officer10383NNofficer
...10384:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]10385LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well10386UHwell
,10387,,
I10388PPI
mean10389VVPmean
,10390,,
are10391VBPbe
you10392PPyou
...10393:...
are10394VBPbe
you10395PPyou
and10396CCand
Aurelius10397NPAurelius
here10398RBhere
just10399RBjust
as10400RBas
...10401:...
as10402INas
amici10403NNSamici
to10404TOto
defend10405VVdefend
the10406DTthe
Constitution10407NPConstitution
,10408,,
or10409CCor
do10410VVPdo
you10411PPyou
have10412VHPhave
some10413DTsome
kind10414NNkind
of10415INof
a10416DTa
concrete10417JJconcrete
grievance10418NNgrievance
?10419SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10420LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The10421DTthe
process10422NNprocess
is10423VBZbe
not10424RBnot
complete10425JJcomplete
,10426,,
Justice10427NPJustice
Alito10428NPAlito
.10429SENT.
The10430DTthe
process10431NNprocess
is10432VBZbe
ongoing10433JJongoing
.10434SENT.
My10435PP$my
client10436NNclient
is10437VBZbe
being10438VBGbe
subjected10439VVNsubject
to10440TOto
a10441DTa
process10442NNprocess
that10443WDTthat
is10444VBZbe
governed10445VVNgovern
by10446INby
officials10447NNSofficial
that10448WDTthat
were10449VBDbe
appointed10450VVNappoint
in10451INin
violation10452NNviolation
of10453INof
the10454DTthe
separation10455NNseparation
of10456INof
powers10457NNSpower
.10458SENT.
So10459INso
that10460DTthat
sense10461NNsense
,10462,,
it10463PPit
is10464VBZbe
n't10465RBn't
complete10466JJcomplete
.10467SENT.
We10468PPwe
can10469MDcan
't10470RB't
describe10471VVdescribe
the10472DTthe
degree10473NNdegree
to10474TOto
which10475WDTwhich
someone10476NNsomeone
might10477MDmight
have10478VHhave
been10479VBNbe
hurt10480VVNhurt
.10481SENT.
But10482CCbut
the10483DTthe
Court's10484NPCourt's
...10485:...
this10486DTthis
Court10487NPCourt
's10488POS's
said10489VVDsay
over10490RPover
and10491CCand
over10492RPover
again10493RBagain
that10494IN/thatthat
it10495PPit
's10496VBZbe
fundamental10497JJfundamental
that10498IN/thatthat
an10499DTan
officer10500NNofficer
of10501INof
the10502DTthe
United10503NPUnited
States10504NPSStates
must10505MDmust
be10506VBbe
appointed10507VVNappoint
pursuant10508JJpursuant
to10509TOto
the10510DTthe
Appointments10511NNSappointment
Clause10512NNclause
.10513SENT.
That10514DTthat
is10515VBZbe
fundamental10516JJfundamental
to10517TOto
the10518DTthe
separation10519NNseparation
of10520INof
powers10521NNSpower
,10522,,
which10523WDTwhich
is10524VBZbe
fundamental10525JJfundamental
to10526TOto
the10527DTthe
Constitution10528NPConstitution
...10529:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]10530LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
I10531PPI
mean10532VVPmean
,10533,,
you10534PPyou
do10535VVPdo
n't10536RBn't
have10537VHhave
to10538TOto
answer10539VVanswer
this10540DTthis
if10541INif
you10542PPyou
do10543VVPdo
n't10544RBn't
want10545VVwant
to10546TOto
,10547,,
but10548CCbut
there10549EXthere
is10550VBZbe
no10551DTno
money10552NNmoney
issue10553NNissue
involved10554VVNinvolve
here10555RBhere
?10556SENT?
[10557SYM[
LAUGHTER10558NNlaughter
]10559SYM]
[MR. OLSON T.]10560LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Of10561INof
course10562NNcourse
,10563,,
there10564RBthere
...10565:...
of10566INof
course10567NNcourse
,10568,,
there10569RBthere
...10570:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]10571LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well10572UHWell
,10573,,
what10574WPwhat
is10575VBZbe
it10576PPit
?10577SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10578LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
There10579EXthere
's10580VBZbe
over10581RBover
...10582:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]10583LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
I10584PPI
'd10585MDwould
just10586RBjust
like10587VVlike
to10588TOto
know10589VVknow
what10590WPwhat
...10591:...
this10592DTthis
is10593VBZbe
a10594DTa
real10595JJreal
case10596NNcase
.10597SENT.
I10598PPI
'd10599MDwould
like10600VVlike
to10601TOto
know10602VVknow
what10603WPwhat
's10604VBZbe
really10605RBreally
going10606VVGgo
on10607INon
here10608RBhere
.10609SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]10610LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well10611UHwell
,10612,,
there10613EXthere
's10614VBZbe
...10615:...
there10616EXthere
's10617VBZbe
over10618RBover
10010619CD@card@
billion10620CDbillion
dollars10621NNSdollar
of10622INof
indebtedness10623NNindebtedness
being10624VBGbe
adjudicated10625VVNadjudicate
in10626INin
various10627JJvarious
procedures10628NNSprocedure
,10629,,
a10630DTa
lot10631NNlot
of10632INof
which10633WDTwhich
is10634VBZbe
...10635:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]10636LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Right10637NPRight
,10638,,
and10639CCand
your10640PP$your
client10641NNclient
wants10642VVZwant
more10643JJRmore
of10644INof
it10645PPit
and10646CCand
somebody10647NNsomebody
else10648RBelse
you10649PPyou
think10650VVPthink
is10651VBZbe
getting10652VVGget
too10653RBtoo
much10654RBmuch
.10655SENT.
So10656RBso
what10657WPwhat
is10658VBZbe
it10659PPit
exactly10660RBexactly
?10661SENT?
If10662INif
you10663PPyou
want10664VVPwant
to10665TOto
answer10666VVanswer
.10667SENT.
If10668INif
not10669RBnot
...10670:...
[MR. OLSON T.]10671LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
We10672PPwe
can10673MDcan
't10674RB't
...10675:...
we10676PPwe
can10677MDcan
't10678RB't
possibly10679RBpossibly
answer10680VVanswer
that10681DTthat
.10682SENT.
There10683EXthere
are10684VBPbe
these10685DTthese
extraordinarily10686RBextraordinarily
large10687JJlarge
claims10688NNSclaim
which10689WDTwhich
the10690DTthe
governor10691NNgovernor
...10692:...
which10693WDTwhich
the10694DTthe
agencies10695NNSagency
of10696INof
Puerto10697NPPuerto
Rico10698NPRico
have10699VHPhave
defaulted10700VVNdefault
on10701RPon
,10702,,
have10703VHPhave
not10704RBnot
been10705VBNbe
able10706JJable
to10707TOto
pay10708VVpay
these10709DTthese
claims10710NNSclaim
.10711SENT.
So10712RBso
,10713,,
yes10714UHyes
,10715,,
you10716PPyou
're10717VBPbe
right10718JJright
.10719SENT.
Of10720INof
course10721NNcourse
,10722,,
it10723PPit
involves10724VVZinvolve
a10725DTa
lot10726NNlot
of10727INof
money10728NNmoney
.10729SENT.
And10730CCand
the10731DTthe
money10732NNmoney
is10733VBZbe
in10734INin
a10735DTa
process10736NNprocess
that10737WDTthat
's10738VBZbe
being10739VBGbe
adjudicated10740VVNadjudicate
by10741INby
a10742DTa
federal10743JJfederal
district10744NNdistrict
judge10745NNjudge
appointed10746VVNappoint
by10747INby
the10748DTthe
Chief10749NPChief
Justice10750NPJustice
of10751INof
the10752DTthe
United10753NPUnited
States10754NPSStates
.10755SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10756LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
did10757VVDdo
n't10758RBn't
your10759PP$your
client10760NNclient
acquiesce10761VVacquiesce
in10762INin
some10763DTsome
settlement10764NNsettlement
?10765SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10766LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
There10767EXthere
was10768VBDbe
a10769DTa
settlement10770NNsettlement
of10771INof
one10772CDone
small10773JJsmall
piece10774NNpiece
of10775INof
it10776PPit
that10777WDTthat
was10778VBDbe
...10779:...
that10780WDTthat
had10781VHDhave
nothing10782NNnothing
to10783TOto
do10784VVdo
with10785INwith
...10786:...
at10787INat
no10788DTno
time10789NNtime
did10790VVDdo
my10791PP$my
clients10792NNSclient
relinquish10793VVrelinquish
their10794PP$their
constitutional10795JJconstitutional
claims10796NNSclaim
or10797CCor
recede10798VVPrecede
from10799INfrom
them10800PPthem
in10801INin
any10802DTany
way10803NNway
.10804SENT.
There10805EXthere
was10806VBDbe
a10807DTa
small10808JJsmall
settlement10809NNsettlement
with10810INwith
respect10811NNrespect
to10812TOto
a10813DTa
taxing10814VVGtax
authority10815NNauthority
where10816WRBwhere
the10817DTthe
sales10818NNSsale
tax10819NNtax
went10820VVDgo
into10821INinto
an10822DTan
agency10823NNagency
.10824SENT.
And10825CCand
that10826DTthat
part10827NNpart
of10828INof
it10829PPit
has10830VHZhave
been10831VBNbe
resolved10832VVNresolve
.10833SENT.
And10834CCand
we10835PPwe
've10836VHPhave
agreed10837VVNagree
not10838RBnot
to10839TOto
challenge10840VVchallenge
...10841:...
my10842PP$my
clients10843NNSclient
have10844VHPhave
agreed10845VVNagree
not10846RBnot
to10847TOto
challenge10848VVchallenge
that10849DTthat
settlement10850NNsettlement
in10851INin
any10852DTany
way10853NNway
.10854SENT.
So10855RBso
that10856DTthat
's10857VBZbe
a10858DTa
bit10859NNbit
of10860INof
a10861DTa
...10862:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10863LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Mr10864NPMr
.10865SENT.
Olson10866NPOlson
...10867:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10868LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But10869CCbut
this10870DTthis
one10871CDone
you10872PPyou
have10873VHPhave
agreed10874VVNagree
to10875TOto
challenge10876VVchallenge
,10877,,
and10878CCand
why10879WRBwhy
,10880,,
you10881PPyou
are10882VBPbe
challenging10883VVGchallenge
?10884SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10885LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Pardon10886NPPardon
?10887SENT?
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10888LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
What10889WPWhat
is10890VBZbe
the10891DTthe
difference10892NNdifference
between10893INbetween
what10894WPwhat
you10895PPyou
agreed10896VVNagree
to10897TOto
and10898CCand
you10899PPyou
're10900VBPbe
not10901RBnot
challenging10902VVGchallenge
and10903CCand
now10904RBnow
what10905WPwhat
you10906PPyou
're10907VBPbe
challenging10908VVGchallenge
?10909SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]10910LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
What10911WPWhat
we10912PPwe
're10913VBPbe
challenging10914VVGchallenge
is10915VBZbe
the10916DTthe
remaining10917VVGremain
part10918NNpart
of10919INof
the10920DTthe
procedure10921NNprocedure
,10922,,
which10923WDTwhich
is10924VBZbe
the10925DTthe
giant10926JJgiant
part10927NNpart
of10928INof
it10929PPit
.10930SENT.
This10931DTthis
is10932VBZbe
a10933DTa
small10934JJsmall
piece10935NNpiece
of10936INof
it10937PPit
that10938WDTthat
was10939VBDbe
settled10940VVNsettle
in10941INin
some10942DTsome
way10943NNway
and10944CCand
...10945:...
and10946CCand
there10947EXthere
was10948VBDbe
really10949RBreally
basically10950RBbasically
no10951DTno
choice10952NNchoice
because10953INbecause
the10954DTthe
Board10955NPBoard
was10956VBDbe
ongoing10957JJongoing
and10958CCand
a10959DTa
settlement10960NNsettlement
was10961VBDbe
reached10962VVNreach
with10963INwith
respect10964NNrespect
to10965TOto
a10966DTa
small10967JJsmall
segment10968NNsegment
of10969INof
the10970DTthe
resources10971NNSresource
.10972SENT.
But10973CCbut
in10974INin
no10975DTno
way10976NNway
did10977VVDdo
my10978PP$my
clients10979NNSclient
relinquish10980VVrelinquish
its10981PP$its
constitutional10982JJconstitutional
rights10983NNSright
to10984TOto
an10985DTan
appointment10986NNappointment
under10987INunder
the10988DTthe
Appointments10989NNSappointment
Clause10990NNclause
.10991SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]10992LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Mr10993NPMr
.10994SENT.
Olson10995NPOlson
...10996:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]10997LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I10998PPI
see10999VVPsee
that11000IN/thatthat
,11001,,
and11002CCand
I11003PPI
wanted11004VVDwant
to11005TOto
ask11006VVask
you11007PPyou
a11008DTa
question11009NNquestion
...11010:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11011LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
One11012CDOne
thing11013NNthing
...11014:...
there11015EXthere
was11016VBDbe
one11017CDone
thing11018NNthing
that11019WDTthat
...11020:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]11021LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...11022:...
that11023IN/thatthat
I11024PPI
think11025VVPthink
you11026PPyou
may11027MDmay
...11028:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11029LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I11030PPI
'm11031VBPbe
sorry11032JJsorry
.11033SENT.
Justice11034NPJustice
Ginsburg11035NPGinsburg
?11036SENT?
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11037LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...11038:...
that11039DTthat
...11040:...
that11041WDTthat
confuses11042VVZconfuse
me11043PPme
about11044INabout
your11045PP$your
presentation11046NNpresentation
,11047,,
because11048INbecause
you11049PPyou
start11050VVPstart
out11051RPout
very11052RBvery
strongly11053RBstrongly
that11054IN/thatthat
the11055DTthe
evil11056NNevil
here11057RBhere
is11058VBZbe
Congress11059NPCongress
aggrandizing11060VVGaggrandize
itself11061PPitself
,11062,,
Congress11063NPCongress
aggrandizing11064VVGaggrandize
itself11065PPitself
at11066INat
the11067DTthe
executive11068NNexecutive
's11069POS's
expense11070NNexpense
.11071SENT.
How11072WRBHow
about11073RBabout
the11074DTthe
member11075NNmember
of11076INof
the11077DTthe
Board11078NPBoard
that11079WDTthat
's11080VBZbe
appointed11081VVNappoint
by11082INby
the11083DTthe
President11084NPPresident
alone11085RBalone
?11086SENT?
There11087EXthere
can11088MDcan
't11089RB't
be11090VBbe
any11091DTany
question11092NNquestion
of11093INof
Congress11094NPCongress
aggrandizing11095VVGaggrandize
itself11096PPitself
.11097SENT.
Congress11098NPCongress
has11099VHZhave
given11100VVNgive
the11101DTthe
President11102NPPresident
alone11103RBalone
that11104DTthat
authority11105NNauthority
.11106SENT.
So11107RBso
would11108MDwould
it11109PPit
be11110VBbe
unconstitutional11111JJunconstitutional
in11112INin
your11113PP$your
view11114NNview
if11115INif
all11116DTall
of11117INof
the11118DTthe
members11119NNSmember
were11120VBDbe
appointed11121VVNappoint
by11122INby
the11123DTthe
President11124NPPresident
and11125CCand
not11126RBnot
subject11127JJsubject
to11128TOto
the11129DTthe
advice11130NNadvice
and11131CCand
consent11132NNconsent
?11133SENT?
I11134PPI
do11135VVPdo
n't11136RBn't
get11137VVget
how11138WRBhow
that11139DTthat
...11140:...
[MR. OLSON T.]11141LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
They11142PPthey
would11143MDwould
...11144:...
they11145PPthey
...11146:...
these11147DTthese
are11148VBPbe
principal11149JJprincipal
officers11150NNSofficer
of11151INof
the11152DTthe
United11153NPUnited
States11154NPSStates
,11155,,
not11156RBnot
inferior11157JJinferior
officers11158NNSofficer
.11159SENT.
Therefore11160RBtherefore
,11161,,
principal11162JJprincipal
officers11163NNSofficer
under11164INunder
the11165DTthe
Constitution11166NPConstitution
must11167MDmust
be11168VBbe
appointed11169VVNappoint
,11170,,
nominated11171VVNnominate
by11172INby
the11173DTthe
President11174NPPresident
...11175:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11176LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But11177CCbut
what11178WPwhat
does11179VVZdo
that11180RBthat
have11181VHhave
to11182TOto
do11183VVdo
with11184INwith
Congress11185NPCongress
aggrandizing11186VVGaggrandize
itself11187PPitself
at11188INat
the11189DTthe
executive11190NNexecutive
's11191POS's
expense11192NNexpense
?11193SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]11194LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well11195UHWell
,11196,,
the11197DTthe
...11198:...
the11199DTthe
...11200:...
they11201PPthey
...11202:...
the11203DTthe
President11204NPPresident
appointed11205VVDappoint
one11206CDone
without11207INwithout
advice11208NNadvice
and11209CCand
consent11210NNconsent
of11211INof
the11212DTthe
Senate11213NPSenate
.11214SENT.
That11215DTthat
violates11216VVZviolate
the11217DTthe
Appointments11218NNSappointment
Clause11219NNclause
.11220SENT.
The11221DTthe
other11222JJother
were11223VBDbe
pursuant11224JJpursuant
to11225TOto
lists11226NNSlist
...11227:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11228LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
How11229WRBHow
about11230INabout
the11231DTthe
D11232NPD
.11233SENT.
C11234LSc
.11235SENT.
Control11236NPControl
Board11237NPBoard
,11238,,
where11239WRBwhere
they11240PPthey
're11241VBPbe
all11242RBall
appointed11243VVNappoint
...11244:...
[MR. OLSON T.]11245LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well11246UHwell
,11247,,
there11248EXthere
's11249VBZbe
...11250:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11251LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...11252:...
by11253INby
the11254DTthe
President11255NPPresident
?11256SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]11257LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...11258:...
that11259WDTthat
has11260VHZhave
never11261RBnever
been11262VBNbe
adjudicated11263VVNadjudicate
.11264SENT.
The11265DTthe
government11266NNgovernment
itself11267PPitself
in11268INin
connection11269NNconnection
with11270INwith
the11271DTthe
D11272NPD
.11273SENT.
C11274LSc
.11275SENT.
Control11276NPControl
Board11277NPBoard
took11278VVDtake
the11279DTthe
position11280NNposition
in11281INin
an11282DTan
Office11283NPOffice
of11284INof
Legal11285NPLegal
Counsel11286NPCounsel
opinion11287NNopinion
that11288IN/thatthat
that11289DTthat
was11290VBDbe
a11291DTa
federal11292JJfederal
agency11293NNagency
.11294SENT.
There11295EXthere
has11296VHZhave
never11297RBnever
been11298VBNbe
a11299DTa
resolution11300NNresolution
of11301INof
that11302DTthat
.11303SENT.
The11304DTthe
D11305NPD
.11306SENT.
C11307LSc
.11308SENT.
Control11309NPControl
Board11310NPBoard
has11311VHZhave
vastly11312RBvastly
more11313JJRmore
limited11314JJlimited
powers11315NNSpower
with11316INwith
respect11317NNrespect
to11318TOto
local11319JJlocal
matters11320NNSmatter
.11321SENT.
And11322CCand
our11323PP$our
...11324:...
our11325PP$our
opponents11326NNSopponent
bring11327VVbring
up11328RPup
and11329CCand
rely11330VVrely
on11331INon
the11332DTthe
Palmore11333NPPalmore
case11334NNcase
,11335,,
which11336WDTwhich
had11337VHDhave
nothing11338NNnothing
to11339TOto
do11340VVdo
with11341INwith
the11342DTthe
Appointments11343NNSappointment
Clause11344NNclause
.11345SENT.
It11346PPit
was11347VBDbe
n't11348RBn't
an11349DTan
adjudication11350NNadjudication
or11351CCor
was11352VBDbe
n't11353RBn't
...11354:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11355LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
They11356PPthey
bring11357VVPbring
up11358RBup
...11359:...
[MR. OLSON T.]11360LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...11361:...
a11362DTa
discussion11363NNdiscussion
of11364INof
...11365:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11366LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Excuse11367NNexcuse
me11368PPme
.11369SENT.
They11370PPthey
bring11371VVPbring
up11372RBup
home11373RBhome
rule11374VVrule
more11375RBRmore
generally11376RBgenerally
.11377SENT.
And11378CCand
that11379DTthat
's11380VBZbe
of11381INof
serious11382JJserious
concern11383NNconcern
here11384RBhere
,11385,,
is11386VBZbe
if11387INif
you11388PPyou
were11389VBDbe
to11390TOto
prevail11391VVprevail
here11392RBhere
,11393,,
what11394WPwhat
would11395MDwould
that11396RBthat
do11397VVdo
for11398INfor
home11399NNhome
rule11400NNrule
and11401CCand
the11402DTthe
territories11403NNSterritory
with11404INwith
elected11405JJelected
governors11406NNSgovernor
?11407SENT?
What11408WPWhat
would11409MDwould
it11410PPit
do11411VVdo
for11412INfor
the11413DTthe
District11414NPDistrict
of11415INof
Columbia11416NPColumbia
with11417INwith
the11418DTthe
elected11419VVNelect
mayor11420NNmayor
,11421,,
city11422NNcity
council11423NNcouncil
,11424,,
the11425DTthe
judges11426NNSjudge
'11427POS'
appointments11428NNSappointment
?11429SENT?
How11430WRBHow
,11431,,
if11432INif
you11433PPyou
were11434VBDbe
to11435TOto
prevail11436VVprevail
here11437RBhere
,11438,,
would11439MDwould
the11440DTthe
line11441NNline
be11442VBbe
drawn11443VVNdraw
so11444RBso
that11445IN/thatthat
it11446PPit
does11447VVZdo
not11448RBnot
affect11449VVaffect
home11450NNhome
rule11451NNrule
?11452SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]11453LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
It11454PPit
would11455MDwould
not11456RBnot
affect11457VVaffect
home11458NNhome
rule11459NNrule
at11460INat
all11461DTall
.11462SENT.
Now11463RBnow
people11464NNSpeople
might11465MDmight
make11466VVmake
the11467DTthe
argument11468NNargument
that11469IN/thatthat
PROMESA11470NPPROMESA
itself11471PPitself
affected11472VVDaffect
in11473INin
some11474DTsome
way11475NNway
because11476INbecause
it11477PPit
took11478VVDtake
over11479INover
the11480DTthe
responsibility11481NNresponsibility
of11482INof
the11483DTthe
...11484:...
of11485INof
the11486DTthe
Puerto11487NPPuerto
Rican11488JJRican
officials11489NNSofficial
to11490TOto
set11491VVset
financial11492JJfinancial
conditions11493NNScondition
,11494,,
establish11495VVestablish
a11496DTa
budget11497NNbudget
...11498:...
budget11499NNbudget
,11500,,
and11501CCand
all11502DTall
of11503INof
those11504DTthose
things11505NNSthing
.11506SENT.
But11507CCbut
the11508DTthe
outcome11509NNoutcome
in11510INin
favor11511NNfavor
of11512INof
my11513PP$my
clients11514NNSclient
in11515INin
this11516DTthis
case11517NNcase
would11518MDwould
simply11519RBsimply
mean11520VVmean
that11521IN/thatthat
the11522DTthe
same11523JJsame
officials11524NNSofficial
would11525MDwould
be11526VBbe
appointed11527VVNappoint
pursuant11528JJpursuant
to11529TOto
the11530DTthe
Constitution11531NPConstitution
.11532SENT.
It11533PPit
would11534MDwould
n't11535RBn't
change11536VVchange
home11537NNhome
rule11538NNrule
.11539SENT.
All11540DTall
of11541INof
the11542DTthe
cases11543NNScase
that11544IN/thatthat
we11545PPwe
've11546VHPhave
relied11547VVNrely
upon11548RPupon
...11549:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11550LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But11551CCbut
would11552MDwould
n't11553RBn't
it11554PPit
require11555VVPrequire
that11556IN/thatthat
similar11557JJsimilar
officials11558NNSofficial
...11559:...
maybe11560RBmaybe
I11561PPI
'm11562VBPbe
not11563RBnot
understanding11564VVGunderstand
...11565:...
in11566INin
the11567DTthe
territories11568NNSterritory
who11569WPwho
exercise11570VVPexercise
territorial11571JJterritorial
power11572NNpower
,11573,,
but11574CCbut
also11575RBalso
affect11576VVaffect
national11577JJnational
power11578NNpower
?11579SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]11580LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
What11581WDTwhat
...11582:...
what11583WPwhat
...11584:...
I11585PPI
think11586VVPthink
the11587DTthe
issue11588NNissue
might11589MDmight
be11590VBbe
primarily11591RBprimarily
federal11592JJfederal
power11593NNpower
or11594CCor
versus11595INversus
primarily11596RBprimarily
local11597JJlocal
.11598SENT.
The11599DTthe
Palmore11600NPPalmore
case11601NNcase
itself11602PPitself
,11603,,
which11604WDTwhich
our11605PP$our
opponents11606NNSopponent
rely11607VVPrely
on11608INon
repeatedly11609RBrepeatedly
,11610,,
says11611VVZsay
in11612INin
that11613DTthat
opinion11614NNopinion
those11615DTthose
were11616VBDbe
primarily11617RBprimarily
or11618CCor
exclusively11619RBexclusively
or11620CCor
largely11621RBlargely
...11622:...
there11623EXthere
are11624VBPbe
various11625JJvarious
different11626JJdifferent
adjectives11627NNSadjective
used11628VVNuse
in11629INin
that11630DTthat
opinion11631NNopinion
...11632:...
local11633JJlocal
D11634NPD
.11635SENT.
C11636LSc
.11637SENT.
criminal11638JJcriminal
proceedings11639NNSproceeding
,11640,,
criminal11641JJcriminal
law11642NNlaw
under11643INunder
the11644DTthe
laws11645NNSlaw
of11646INof
the11647DTthe
District11648NPDistrict
of11649INof
Columbia11650NPColumbia
.11651SENT.
And11652CCand
this11653DTthis
Court11654NPCourt
has11655VHZhave
repeatedly11656RBrepeatedly
likened11657VVNliken
the11658DTthe
power11659NNpower
that11660WDTthat
can11661MDcan
be11662VBbe
exercised11663VVNexercise
in11664INin
the11665DTthe
territories11666NNSterritory
under11667INunder
the11668DTthe
territorial11669JJterritorial
clause11670NNclause
or11671CCor
under11672INunder
the11673DTthe
clause11674NNclause
that11675WDTthat
gives11676VVZgive
power11677NNpower
over11678INover
the11679DTthe
District11680NPDistrict
of11681INof
Columbia11682NPColumbia
local11683JJlocal
territorial11684JJterritorial
matters11685NNSmatter
,11686,,
the11687DTthe
type11688NNtype
of11689INof
authority11690NNauthority
that11691WDTthat
may11692MDmay
be11693VBbe
given11694VVNgive
by11695INby
a11696DTa
state11697NNstate
to11698TOto
a11699DTa
local11700JJlocal
municipality11701NNmunicipality
.11702SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]11703LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Congress11704NPCongress
enacts11705VVZenact
the11706DTthe
D11707NPD
.11708SENT.
C11709LSc
.11710SENT.
code11711NNcode
,11712,,
right11713RBright
?11714SENT?
The11715DTthe
D11716NPD
.11717SENT.
C11718LSc
.11719SENT.
code11720NNcode
is11721VBZbe
enacted11722VVNenact
by11723INby
Congress11724NPCongress
?11725SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]11726LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Yes11727NPYes
,11728,,
although11729INalthough
...11730:...
well11731RBwell
,11732,,
there11733EXthere
is11734VBZbe
...11735:...
it11736PPit
's11737VBZbe
changed11738VVNchange
over11739INover
time11740NNtime
.11741SENT.
But11742CCbut
...11743:...
but11744CCbut
at11745INat
...11746:...
at11747INat
a11748DTa
certain11749JJcertain
point11750NNpoint
in11751INin
time11752NNtime
,11753,,
yes11754UHyes
.11755SENT.
But11756CCbut
...11757:...
but11758CCbut
the11759DTthe
fact11760NNfact
is11761VBZbe
that11762IN/thatthat
there11763EXthere
is11764VBZbe
a11765DTa
difference11766NNdifference
between11767INbetween
primarily11768RBprimarily
local11769JJlocal
authority11770NNauthority
,11771,,
and11772CCand
that11773WDTthat
's11774VBZbe
discussed11775VVNdiscuss
in11776INin
the11777DTthe
...11778:...
in11779INin
the11780DTthe
Palmore11781NPPalmore
case11782NNcase
.11783SENT.
The11784DTthe
reason11785NNreason
that11786IN/thatthat
those11787DTthose
...11788:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]11789LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So11790RBso
...11791:...
so11792INso
that11793WDTthat
does11794VVZdo
sound11795NNsound
like11796INlike
the11797DTthe
test11798NNtest
that11799WDTthat
is11800VBZbe
being11801VBGbe
used11802VVNuse
by11803INby
Mr11804NPMr
.11805SENT.
Verrilli11806NPVerrilli
and11807CCand
Mr11808NPMr
.11809SENT.
Wall11810NPWall
.11811SENT.
I11812PPI
mean11813VVPmean
,11814,,
they11815PPthey
've11816VHPhave
said11817VVNsay
that11818IN/thatthat
your11819PP$your
test11820NNtest
is11821VBZbe
kind11822NNkind
of11823INof
malleable11824JJmalleable
.11825SENT.
And11826CCand
I11827PPI
guess11828VVPguess
what11829WPwhat
I11830PPI
'd11831MDwould
like11832VVlike
,11833,,
what11834WPwhat
is11835VBZbe
your11836PP$your
test11837NNtest
?11838SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]11839LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The11840DTthe
test11841NNtest
...11842:...
my11843PP$my
test11844NNtest
is11845VBZbe
this11846DTthis
Court11847NPCourt
's11848POS's
test11849NNtest
,11850,,
which11851WDTwhich
was11852VBDbe
articulated11853VVNarticulate
in11854INin
the11855DTthe
Buckley11856NPBuckley
case11857NNcase
,11858,,
again11859RBagain
in11860INin
the11861DTthe
...11862:...
in11863INin
the11864DTthe
...11865:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]11866LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But11867CCbut
you11868PPyou
know11869VVPknow
what11870WPwhat
...11871:...
what11872WPwhat
struck11873VVDstrike
me11874PPme
...11875:...
[MR. OLSON T.]11876LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...11877:...
in11878INin
the11879DTthe
Lucia11880NPLucia
case11881NNcase
.11882SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]11883LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...11884:...
what11885WPwhat
struck11886VVDstrike
me11887PPme
when11888WRBwhen
I11889PPI
read11890VVPread
that11891IN/thatthat
,11892,,
when11893WRBwhen
I11894PPI
read11895VVPread
your11896PP$your
brief11897NNbrief
,11898,,
the11899DTthe
Buckley11900NPBuckley
test11901NNtest
is11902VBZbe
significant11903JJsignificant
authority11904NNauthority
pursuant11905JJpursuant
to11906TOto
the11907DTthe
laws11908NNSlaw
of11909INof
the11910DTthe
United11911NPUnited
States11912NPSStates
.11913SENT.
I11914PPI
guess11915VVPguess
what11916WPwhat
struck11917VVDstrike
me11918PPme
was11919VBDbe
that11920IN/thatthat
in11921INin
many11922JJmany
...11923:...
on11924INon
many11925JJmany
occasions11926NNSoccasion
you11927PPyou
modified11928VVDmodify
that11929DTthat
test11930NNtest
in11931INin
your11932PP$your
brief11933NNbrief
.11934SENT.
You11935PPyou
said11936VVDsay
significant11937JJsignificant
federal11938JJfederal
authority11939NNauthority
pursuant11940JJpursuant
to11941TOto
the11942DTthe
laws11943NNSlaw
of11944INof
the11945DTthe
United11946NPUnited
States11947NPSStates
.11948SENT.
And11949CCand
when11950WRBwhen
you11951PPyou
do11952VVPdo
that11953IN/thatthat
,11954,,
it11955PPit
strikes11956VVZstrike
me11957PPme
that11958IN/thatthat
you11959PPyou
're11960VBPbe
coming11961VVGcome
actually11962RBactually
pretty11963RBpretty
close11964JJclose
,11965,,
I11966PPI
mean11967VVPmean
,11968,,
and11969CCand
if11970INif
you11971PPyou
agree11972VVPagree
on11973INon
a11974DTa
test11975NNtest
,11976,,
that11977WDTthat
seems11978VVZseem
not11979RBnot
a11980DTa
bad11981JJbad
thing11982NNthing
.11983SENT.
It11984PPit
seems11985VVZseem
as11986RBas
though11987RBthough
,11988,,
when11989WRBwhen
you11990PPyou
say11991VVPsay
significant11992JJsignificant
federal11993JJfederal
authority11994NNauthority
,11995,,
you11996PPyou
're11997VBPbe
coming11998VVGcome
pretty11999RBpretty
close12000JJclose
to12001TOto
what12002WPwhat
Mr12003NPMr
.12004SENT.
Wall12005NPWall
and12006CCand
Mr12007NPMr
.12008SENT.
Verrilli12009NPVerrilli
have12010VHPhave
proposed12011VVNpropose
.12012SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]12013LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well12014UHwell
,12015,,
we12016PPwe
looked12017VVDlook
at12018INat
each12019DTeach
of12020INof
the12021DTthe
cases12022NNScase
that12023WDTthat
are12024VBPbe
cited12025VVNcite
both12026CCboth
in12027INin
our12028PP$our
briefs12029NNSbrief
and12030CCand
our12031PP$our
opponents12032NNSopponent
'12033POS'
briefs12034NNSbrief
,12035,,
including12036VVGinclude
the12037DTthe
United12038NPUnited
States12039NPSStates
'12040POS'
briefs12041NNSbrief
.12042SENT.
The12043DTthe
...12044:...
it12045PPit
is12046VBZbe
...12047:...
it12048PPit
is12049VBZbe
...12050:...
and12051CCand
it12052PPit
's12053VBZbe
the12054DTthe
test12055NNtest
of12056INof
this12057DTthis
Court12058NPCourt
,12059,,
not12060RBnot
just12061RBjust
in12062INin
the12063DTthe
Buckley12064NPBuckley
case12065NNcase
,12066,,
but12067CCbut
as12068RBas
...12069:...
as12070RBas
recently12071RBrecently
...12072:...
as12073RBas
recently12074RBrecently
as12075INas
a12076DTa
couple12077NNcouple
years12078NNSyear
ago12079RBago
in12080INin
the12081DTthe
Lucia12082NPLucia
case12083NNcase
.12084SENT.
It12085PPit
's12086VBZbe
the12087DTthe
same12088JJsame
case12089NNcase
.12090SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]12091LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Right12092NPRight
,12093,,
but12094CCbut
always12095RBalways
...12096:...
always12097RBalways
to12098TOto
distinguish12099VVdistinguish
between12100INbetween
officers12101NNSofficer
and12102CCand
employees12103NNSemployee
.12104SENT.
And12105CCand
what12106WPwhat
I12107PPI
'm12108VBPbe
suggesting12109VVGsuggest
is12110VBZbe
that12111IN/thatthat
when12112WRBwhen
you12113PPyou
apply12114VVPapply
it12115PPit
to12116TOto
this12117DTthis
situation12118NNsituation
,12119,,
your12120PP$your
own12121JJown
briefs12122NNSbrief
modify12123VVmodify
the12124DTthe
test12125NNtest
by12126INby
talking12127VVGtalk
about12128INabout
federal12129JJfederal
authority12130NNauthority
and12131CCand
implicitly12132RBimplicitly
comparing12133VVGcompare
federal12134JJfederal
authority12135NNauthority
to12136TOto
local12137JJlocal
authority12138NNauthority
.12139SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]12140LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
And12141CCand
we12142PPwe
acknowledge12143VVPacknowledge
that12144IN/thatthat
,12145,,
that12146WDTthat
with12147INwith
respect12148NNrespect
to12149TOto
the12150DTthe
test12151NNtest
that12152IN/thatthat
this12153DTthis
Court12154NPCourt
articulated12155VVDarticulate
,12156,,
repeatedly12157RBrepeatedly
,12158,,
Lucia12159NPLucia
was12160VBDbe
just12161RBjust
the12162DTthe
last12163JJlast
time12164NNtime
it12165PPit
did12166VVDdo
,12167,,
that12168DTthat
authority12169NNauthority
under12170INunder
the12171DTthe
laws12172NNSlaw
of12173INof
the12174DTthe
United12175NPUnited
States12176NPSStates
has12177VHZhave
always12178RBalways
accepted12179VVNaccept
the12180DTthe
...12181:...
the12182DTthe
purely12183RBpurely
local12184JJlocal
authority12185NNauthority
that12186WDTthat
's12187VHZhave
been12188VBNbe
exercised12189VVNexercise
in12190INin
the12191DTthe
territories12192NNSterritory
.12193SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12194LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
So12195RBso
if12196INif
it12197PPit
's12198VBZbe
...12199:...
[MR. OLSON T.]12200LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
There12201EXthere
's12202VBZbe
also12203RBalso
exceptions12204NNSexception
for12205INfor
transitional12206JJtransitional
governments12207NNSgovernment
.12208SENT.
The12209DTthe
Philippines12210NPSPhilippine
,12211,,
for12212INfor
example12213NNexample
.12214SENT.
There12215EXthere
was12216VBDbe
a12217DTa
local12218JJlocal
government12219NNgovernment
and12220CCand
then12221RBthen
it12222PPit
was12223VBDbe
replaced12224VVNreplace
...12225:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12226LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Mr12227NPMr
.12228SENT.
Olson12229NPOlson
,12230,,
I'm12231NPI'm
...12232:...
I12233PPI
'm12234VBPbe
confused12235VVNconfuse
.12236SENT.
I12237PPI
honestly12238RBhonestly
do12239VVPdo
n't12240RBn't
understand12241VVunderstand
what12242WPwhat
the12243DTthe
difference12244NNdifference
between12245INbetween
your12246PP$your
test12247NNtest
and12248CCand
the12249DTthe
government12250NNgovernment
's12251POS's
test12252NNtest
is12253VBZbe
in12254INin
this12255DTthis
case12256NNcase
.12257SENT.
If12258INif
you12259PPyou
could12260MDcould
articulate12261VVarticulate
that12262IN/thatthat
in12263INin
a12264DTa
few12265JJfew
sentences12266NNSsentence
,12267,,
I12268PPI
'd12269MDwould
be12270VBbe
grateful12271JJgrateful
.12272SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]12273LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The12274DTthe
test12275NNtest
is12276VBZbe
...12277:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12278LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
The12279DTthe
difference12280NNdifference
between12281INbetween
the12282DTthe
two12283CDtwo
tests12284NNStest
.12285SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]12286LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well12287UHWell
,12288,,
the12289DTthe
difference12290NNdifference
between12291INbetween
the12292DTthe
two12293CDtwo
is12294VBZbe
that12295IN/thatthat
we12296PPwe
believe12297VVPbelieve
,12298,,
and12299CCand
what12300WPwhat
...12301:...
what12302WPwhat
this12303DTthis
Court12304NPCourt
has12305VHZhave
taught12306VVNteach
us12307PPus
,12308,,
that12309IN/thatthat
if12310INif
you12311PPyou
're12312VBPbe
exercising12313VVGexercise
significant12314JJsignificant
authority12315NNauthority
under12316INunder
the12317DTthe
laws12318NNSlaw
of12319INof
the12320DTthe
United12321NPUnited
States12322NPSStates
,12323,,
the12324DTthe
laws12325NNSlaw
enacted12326VVNenact
by12327INby
Congress12328NPCongress
with12329INwith
respect12330NNrespect
to12331TOto
the12332DTthe
government12333NNgovernment
,12334,,
affairs12335NNSaffair
of12336INof
the12337DTthe
federal12338JJfederal
government12339NNgovernment
,12340,,
as12341RBas
opposed12342VVNoppose
to12343TOto
purely12344RBpurely
local12345JJlocal
municipal12346NNmunicipal
,12347,,
the12348DTthe
...12349:...
the12350DTthe
speed12351NNspeed
limits12352NNSlimit
,12353,,
the12354DTthe
zoning12355NNzoning
...12356:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12357LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I12358PPI
understand12359VVPunderstand
...12360:...
I12361PPI
understand12362VVPunderstand
the12363DTthe
test12364NNtest
.12365SENT.
My12366PP$my
question12367NNquestion
is12368VBZbe
,12369,,
what12370WPwhat
's12371VBZbe
the12372DTthe
difference12373NNdifference
between12374INbetween
that12375WDTthat
and12376CCand
the12377DTthe
question12378NNquestion
asking12379VVGask
whether12380INwhether
the12381DTthe
individual12382NNindividual
or12383CCor
the12384DTthe
Board12385NPBoard
is12386VBZbe
acting12387VVGact
primarily12388RBprimarily
locally12389RBlocally
or12390CCor
primarily12391RBprimarily
nationally12392RBnationally
?12393SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]12394LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
It12395PPit
...12396:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12397LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
What12398WPWhat
's12399VBZbe
the12400DTthe
difference12401NNdifference
?12402SENT?
What12403WPWhat
's12404VBZbe
the12405DTthe
delta12406NNdelta
?12407SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]12408LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The12409NPThe
...12410:...
the12411DTthe
delta12412NNdelta
is12413VBZbe
,12414,,
is12415VBZbe
something12416NNsomething
that12417WDTthat
is12418VBZbe
a12419DTa
municipal12420JJmunicipal
matter12421NNmatter
,12422,,
is12423VBZbe
it12424PPit
...12425:...
have12426VHPhave
to12427TOto
do12428VVdo
with12429INwith
local12430JJlocal
affairs12431NNSaffair
,12432,,
speed12433NNspeed
limits12434NNSlimit
,12435,,
zoning12436NNzoning
,12437,,
and12438CCand
things12439NNSthing
of12440INof
that12441DTthat
nature12442NNnature
,12443,,
as12444RBas
opposed12445VVNoppose
to12446TOto
federal12447JJfederal
statutes12448NNSstatute
that12449WDTthat
deal12450VVPdeal
with12451INwith
a12452DTa
national12453JJnational
crisis12454NNcrisis
.12455SENT.
This12456DTthis
was12457VBDbe
a12458DTa
national12459JJnational
crisis12460NNcrisis
,12461,,
a12462DTa
national12463JJnational
...12464:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12465LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Could12466MDcould
I12467PPI
rephrase12468VVrephrase
that12469IN/thatthat
as12470INas
asking12471VVGask
whether12472INwhether
the12473DTthe
Board12474NPBoard
was12475VBDbe
acting12476VVGact
primarily12477RBprimarily
locally12478RBlocally
or12479CCor
primarily12480RBprimarily
nationally12481RBnationally
?12482SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]12483LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
It12484PPit
is12485VBZbe
...12486:...
the12487DTthe
Board12488NPBoard
is12489VBZbe
acting12490VVGact
primarily12491RBprimarily
nationally12492RBnationally
.12493SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12494LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Okay12495NPOkay
.12496SENT.
So12497RBso
we12498PPwe
do12499VVPdo
agree12500VVagree
on12501INon
a12502DTa
test12503NNtest
then12504RBthen
?12505SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]12506LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Pardon12507NPPardon
me12508PPme
?12509SENT?
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12510LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
So12511RBso
then12512RBthen
we12513PPwe
do12514VVPdo
agree12515VVagree
on12516INon
the12517DTthe
test12518NNtest
,12519,,
right12520RBright
,12521,,
whether12522INwhether
the12523DTthe
Board12524NPBoard
was12525VBDbe
acting12526VVGact
primarily12527RBprimarily
locally12528RBlocally
or12529CCor
primarily12530RBprimarily
nationally12531RBnationally
?12532SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]12533LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well12534UHWell
,12535,,
that12536DTthat
part12537NNpart
of12538INof
it12539PPit
,12540,,
yes12541UHyes
.12542SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]12543LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Okay12544NPOkay
.12545SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]12546LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Because12547INbecause
those12548DTthose
...12549:...
what12550WPwhat
this12551DTthis
Court12552NPCourt
has12553VHZhave
said12554VVNsay
repeatedly12555RBrepeatedly
is12556VBZbe
that12557IN/thatthat
,12558,,
where12559WRBwhere
there12560EXthere
is12561VBZbe
local12562JJlocal
municipal12563JJmunicipal
authority12564NNauthority
,12565,,
Congress12566NPCongress
has12567VHZhave
the12568DTthe
power12569NNpower
under12570INunder
Article12571NPArticle
IV12572NPIV
to12573TOto
give12574VVgive
government12575NNgovernment
and12576CCand
...12577:...
and12578CCand
regulate12579VVregulate
the12580DTthe
affairs12581NNSaffair
in12582INin
municipalities12583NNSmunicipality
.12584SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12585LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
So12586RBso
if12587INif
it12588PPit
's12589VBZbe
primarily12590RBprimarily
...12591:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12592LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Mr12593NPMr
.12594SENT.
Olson12595NPOlson
...12596:...
[MR. OLSON T.]12597LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
As12598INas
...12599:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12600LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...12601:...
I12602PPI
do12603VVPdo
n't12604RBn't
want12605VVwant
you12606PPyou
to12607TOto
ignore12608VVignore
the12609DTthe
de12610FWde
facto12611FWfacto
officer12612NNofficer
.12613SENT.
But12614CCbut
just12615RBjust
to12616TOto
finish12617VVfinish
this12618DTthis
,12619,,
there12620EXthere
's12621VBZbe
this12622DTthis
nuance12623NNnuance
between12624INbetween
you12625PPyou
and12626CCand
your12627PP$your
adversaries12628NNSadversary
on12629INon
are12630VBPbe
you12631PPyou
dealing12632VVGdeal
primarily12633RBprimarily
with12634INwith
a12635DTa
local12636JJlocal
matter12637NNmatter
?12638SENT?
And12639CCand
they12640PPthey
would12641MDwould
say12642VVsay
dealing12643VVGdeal
with12644INwith
a12645DTa
budget12646NNbudget
,12647,,
dealing12648VVGdeal
with12649INwith
running12650VVGrun
the12651DTthe
government12652NNgovernment
,12653,,
that12654WDTthat
's12655VBZbe
all12656RBall
local12657JJlocal
.12658SENT.
You12659PPyou
are12660VBPbe
attempting12661VVGattempt
to12662TOto
say12663VVsay
something12664NNsomething
different12665JJdifferent
,12666,,
but12667CCbut
I12668PPI
'm12669VBPbe
not12670RBnot
sure12671JJsure
what12672WPwhat
that12673DTthat
difference12674NNdifference
is12675VBZbe
,12676,,
because12677RBbecause
,12678,,
when12679WRBwhen
they12680PPthey
use12681VVPuse
the12682DTthe
words12683NNSword
primarily12684RBprimarily
local12685JJlocal
matters12686NNSmatter
,12687,,
that12688WDTthat
's12689VBZbe
the12690DTthe
way12691NNway
I12692PPI
understand12693VVPunderstand
them12694PPthem
to12695TOto
be12696VBbe
using12697VVGuse
it12698PPit
.12699SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]12700LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The12701NPThe
...12702:...
the12703DTthe
test12704NNtest
...12705:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12706LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
They12707PPthey
...12708:...
they12709PPthey
can12710MDcan
obviously12711RBobviously
correct12712VVcorrect
me12713PPme
if12714INif
I12715PPI
'm12716VBPbe
wrong12717JJwrong
.12718SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]12719LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well12720UHWell
...12721:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12722LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But12723CCbut
they12724PPthey
're12725VBPbe
saying12726VVGsay
this12727DTthis
Board12728NPBoard
is12729VBZbe
dealing12730VVGdeal
with12731INwith
primarily12732RBprimarily
local12733JJlocal
matters12734NNSmatter
because12735INbecause
it12736PPit
's12737VBZbe
dealing12738VVGdeal
primarily12739RBprimarily
with12740INwith
a12741DTa
budget12742NNbudget
and12743CCand
with12744INwith
...12745:...
[MR. OLSON T.]12746LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
And12747CCand
that12748DTthat
's12749VBZbe
not12750RBnot
...12751:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12752LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That12753DTthat
...12754:...
that12755DTthat
...12756:...
that12757WDTthat
's12758VBZbe
...12759:...
okay12760JJokay
.12761SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]12762LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
With12763INwith
all12764DTall
due12765JJdue
respect12766NNrespect
,12767,,
you12768PPyou
cannot12769MDcan
say12770VVsay
that12771IN/thatthat
at12772INat
the12773DTthe
same12774JJsame
time12775NNtime
that12776IN/thatthat
you12777PPyou
've12778VHPhave
read12779VVNread
the12780DTthe
PROMESA12781NPPROMESA
statute12782NNstatute
itself12783PPitself
.12784SENT.
And12785CCand
this12786DTthis
Court12787NPCourt
...12788:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12789LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Well12790UHWell
,12791,,
I12792PPI
...12793:...
I12794PPI
've12795VHPhave
read12796VVNread
it12797PPit
,12798,,
but12799CCbut
that12800WDTthat
does12801VVZdo
n't12802RBn't
mean12803VVmean
I12804PPI
know12805VVknow
what12806WPwhat
you12807PPyou
're12808VBPbe
referring12809VVGrefer
to12810TOto
.12811SENT.
Could12812MDcould
you12813PPyou
succinctly12814RBsuccinctly
make12815VVPmake
the12816DTthe
...12817:...
the12818DTthe
difference12819NNdifference
between12820INbetween
how12821WRBhow
you12822PPyou
view12823VVPview
primarily12824RBprimarily
dealing12825VVGdeal
with12826INwith
...12827:...
[MR. OLSON T.]12828LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well12829UHWell
...12830:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12831LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...12832:...
in12833INin
your12834PP$your
way12835NNway
and12836CCand
the12837DTthe
way12838NNway
the12839DTthe
other12840JJother
side12841NNside
does12842VVZdo
?12843SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]12844LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...12845:...
the12846DTthe
insolvency12847NNinsolvency
of12848INof
a12849DTa
territory12850NNterritory
of12851INof
the12852DTthe
United12853NPUnited
States12854NPSStates
is12855VBZbe
not12856RBnot
a12857DTa
local12858JJlocal
matter12859NNmatter
.12860SENT.
That12861DTthat
's12862VBZbe
what12863WPwhat
this12864DTthis
Court12865NPCourt
said12866VVDsay
in12867INin
the12868DTthe
Limtiaco12869NPLimtiaco
case12870NNcase
in12871INin
200712872CD@card@
.12873SENT.
The12874DTthe
...12875:...
and12876CCand
...12877:...
and12878CCand
that12879DTthat
's12880VBZbe
what12881WPwhat
Congress12882NPCongress
was12883VBDbe
saying12884VVGsay
when12885WRBwhen
it12886PPit
was12887VBDbe
dealing12888VVGdeal
with12889INwith
the12890DTthe
enactment12891NNenactment
of12892INof
this12893DTthis
statute12894NNstatute
.12895SENT.
We12896PPwe
have12897VHPhave
a12898DTa
fiscal12899JJfiscal
catastrophe12900NNcatastrophe
,12901,,
a12902DTa
humanitarian12903JJhumanitarian
crisis12904NNcrisis
involving12905VVGinvolve
millions12906NNSmillion
of12907INof
citizens12908NNScitizen
,12909,,
312910CD3
million12911CDmillion
American12912JJAmerican
citizens12913NNScitizen
in12914INin
Puerto12915NPPuerto
Rico12916NPRico
,12917,,
but12918CCbut
citizens12919NNScitizen
all12920RBall
over12921INover
the12922DTthe
United12923NPUnited
States12924NPSStates
who12925WPwho
are12926VBPbe
owed12927VVNowe
money12928NNmoney
by12929INby
the12930DTthe
government12931NNgovernment
of12932INof
Puerto12933NPPuerto
Rico12934NPRico
or12935CCor
agencies12936NNSagency
of12937INof
the12938DTthe
government12939NNgovernment
of12940INof
Puerto12941NPPuerto
...12942:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12943LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So12944RBso
,12945,,
Mr12946NPMr
.12947SENT.
Olson12948NPOlson
...12949:...
[MR. OLSON T.]12950LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...12951:...
Rico12952NPRico
.12953SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12954LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Counsel12955NPCounsel
,12956,,
it12957PPit
's12958VBZbe
just12959RBjust
then12960RBthen
...12961:...
it12962PPit
...12963:...
it12964PPit
's12965VBZbe
just12966RBjust
a12967DTa
question12968NNquestion
of12969INof
size12970NNsize
.12971SENT.
I12972PPI
mean12973VVPmean
,12974,,
if12975INif
the12976DTthe
same12977JJsame
thing12978NNthing
,12979,,
we12980PPwe
're12981VBPbe
talking12982VVGtalk
about12983RBabout
not12984RBnot
Puerto12985NPPuerto
Rico12986NPRico
,12987,,
but12988CCbut
Ponce12989NPPonce
...12990:...
see12991VVPsee
,12992,,
I12993PPI
do12994VVPdo
n't12995RBn't
know12996VVknow
the12997DTthe
pronunciation12998NNpronunciation
...12999:...
Puerto13000NPPuerto
Rico13001NPRico
,13002,,
your13003PP$your
position13004NNposition
would13005MDwould
be13006VBbe
different13007JJdifferent
?13008SENT?
Or13009CCor
a13010DTa
county13011NNcounty
in13012INin
Puerto13013NPPuerto
Rico13014NPRico
?13015SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]13016LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
I13017PPI
think13018VVPthink
that13019IN/thatthat
it13020PPit
's13021VBZbe
possible13022JJpossible
that13023IN/thatthat
you13024PPyou
could13025MDcould
find13026VVfind
a13027DTa
fiscal13028JJfiscal
insolvency13029NNinsolvency
situation13030NNsituation
of13031INof
a13032DTa
small13033JJsmall
enough13034JJenough
unit13035NNunit
of13036INof
a13037DTa
...13038:...
of13039INof
a13040DTa
portion13041NNportion
of13042INof
Puerto13043NPPuerto
Rico13044NPRico
where13045WRBwhere
you13046PPyou
would13047MDwould
n't13048RBn't
be13049VBbe
talking13050VVGtalk
about13051INabout
this13052DTthis
,13053,,
but13054CCbut
Guam13055NPGuam
,13056,,
which13057WDTwhich
is13058VBZbe
what13059WPwhat
this13060DTthis
Court13061NPCourt
talked13062VVDtalk
about13063RBabout
in13064INin
that13065DTthat
case13066NNcase
,13067,,
Limtiaco13068NPLimtiaco
case13069NNcase
,13070,,
was13071VBDbe
113072CD1
/13073SYM/
400th13074JJ400th
the13075DTthe
size13076NNsize
of13077INof
Puerto13078NPPuerto
Rico13079NPRico
,13080,,
involving13081VVGinvolve
that13082IN/thatthat
tiny13083JJtiny
fraction13084NNfraction
of13085INof
the13086DTthe
significance13087NNsignificance
of13088INof
Puerto13089NPPuerto
Rico13090NPRico
.13091SENT.
We13092PPwe
're13093VBPbe
talking13094VVGtalk
here13095RBhere
about13096RBabout
not13097RBnot
just13098RBjust
the13099DTthe
size13100NNsize
but13101CCbut
the13102DTthe
dimension13103NNdimension
of13104INof
the13105DTthe
problem13106NNproblem
,13107,,
the13108DTthe
number13109NNnumber
of13110INof
citizens13111NNScitizen
that13112WDTthat
are13113VBPbe
involved13114VVNinvolve
,13115,,
the13116DTthe
number13117NNnumber
of13118INof
creditors13119NNScreditor
'13120POS'
claims13121NNSclaim
,13122,,
over13123INover
20013124CD@card@
claw-back13125NNclaw-back
claims13126NNSclaim
against13127INagainst
financial13128JJfinancial
institutions13129NNSinstitution
throughout13130INthroughout
the13131DTthe
United13132NPUnited
States13133NPStates
that13134WDTthat
are13135VBPbe
being13136VBGbe
pursued13137VVNpursue
in13138INin
federal13139JJfederal
court13140NNcourt
.13141SENT.
This13142DTthis
is13143VBZbe
a13144DTa
...13145:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]13146LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So13147RBso
would13148MDwould
it13149PPit
be13150VBbe
right13151JJright
to13152TOto
say13153VVsay
,13154,,
Mr13155NPMr
.13156SENT.
Olson13157NPOlson
,13158,,
that13159WDTthat
you13160PPyou
view13161VVPview
this13162DTthis
statute13163NNstatute
as13164INas
essentially13165RBessentially
a13166DTa
statute13167NNstatute
about13168INabout
debt13169NNdebt
restructuring13170NNrestructuring
?13171SENT?
I13172PPI
mean13173VVPmean
,13174,,
it13175PPit
has13176VHZhave
other13177JJother
aspects13178NNSaspect
and13179CCand
the13180DTthe
Board13181NPBoard
does13182VVZdo
other13183JJother
things13184NNSthing
and13185CCand
oversees13186VVZoversee
Puerto13187NPPuerto
Rican13188NPRican
budgets13189NNSbudget
going13190VVGgo
forward13191RBforward
,13192,,
but13193CCbut
you13194PPyou
're13195VBPbe
saying13196VVGsay
that13197IN/thatthat
what13198WPwhat
we13199PPwe
should13200MDshould
do13201VVdo
is13202VBZbe
look13203VVlook
at13204INat
the13205DTthe
statute13206NNstatute
and13207CCand
say13208VVPsay
it13209PPit
's13210VBZbe
about13211RBabout
restructuring13212VVGrestructure
a13213DTa
bankrupt13214JJbankrupt
territory13215NNterritory
's13216POS's
debt13217NNdebt
and13218CCand
that13219IN/thatthat
that13220WDTthat
has13221VHZhave
to13222TOto
be13223VBbe
viewed13224VVNview
as13225INas
national13226JJnational
?13227SENT?
Is13228VBZbe
that13229IN/thatthat
the13230DTthe
theory13231NNtheory
?13232SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]13233LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well13234UHWell
,13235,,
that13236WDTthat
is13237VBZbe
part13238NNpart
of13239INof
the13240DTthe
theory13241NNtheory
.13242SENT.
And13243CCand
as13244RBas
...13245:...
as13246INas
the13247DTthe
United13248NPUnited
States13249NPSStates
repeatedly13250RBrepeatedly
said13251VVDsay
with13252INwith
respect13253NNrespect
to13254TOto
,13255,,
in13256INin
the13257DTthe
Freytag13258NPFreytag
case13259NNcase
,13260,,
the13261DTthe
deputy13262JJdeputy
solicitor13263NNsolicitor
general13264NNgeneral
was13265VBDbe
asked13266VVNask
a13267DTa
question13268NNquestion
about13269INabout
what13270WPwhat
if13271INif
the13272DTthe
governor13273NNgovernor
of13274INof
Puerto13275NPPuerto
Rico13276NPRico
was13277VBDbe
appointed13278VVNappoint
by13279INby
Congress13280NPCongress
or13281CCor
a13282DTa
federal13283JJfederal
official13284NNofficial
?13285SENT?
And13286CCand
the13287DTthe
response13288NNresponse
from13289INfrom
the13290DTthe
federal13291JJfederal
government13292NNgovernment
was13293VBDbe
that13294IN/thatthat
would13295MDwould
invoke13296VVinvoke
in13297INin
every13298DTevery
case13299NNcase
the13300DTthe
Appointments13301NNSappointment
Clause13302NNclause
.13303SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13304LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Did13305VVDdo
that13306IN/thatthat
deputy13307JJdeputy
solicitor13308NNsolicitor
general13309NNgeneral
prevail13310VVPprevail
on13311INon
that13312DTthat
position13313NNposition
?13314SENT?
[13315SYM[
LAUGHTER13316NNlaughter
]13317SYM]
[MR. OLSON T.]13318LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
That13319DTthat
deputy13320JJdeputy
solicitor13321NNsolicitor
general13322NNgeneral
made13323VVDmake
a13324DTa
beautiful13325JJbeautiful
argument13326NNargument
,13327,,
Mr13328NPMr
.13329SENT.
Chief13330NPChief
Justice13331NPJustice
.13332SENT.
[13333SYM[
LAUGHTER13334NNlaughter
]13335SYM]
[MR. OLSON T.]13336LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
And13337CCand
...13338:...
and13339CCand
fortunately13340RBfortunately
for13341INfor
him13342PPhim
...13343:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13344LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
A13345DTa
beautiful13346JJbeautiful
losing13347VVGlose
argument13348NNargument
.13349SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]13350LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...13351:...
the13352DTthe
Court13353NPCourt
did13354VVDdo
not13355RBnot
decide13356VVdecide
that13357DTthat
precise13358JJprecise
case13359NNcase
.13360SENT.
But13361CCbut
that13362DTthat
...13363:...
but13364CCbut
that13365DTthat
argument13366NNargument
that13367WDTthat
was13368VBDbe
made13369VVNmake
is13370VBZbe
the13371DTthe
same13372JJsame
argument13373NNargument
that13374IN/thatthat
the13375DTthe
United13376NPUnited
States13377NPSStates
has13378VHZhave
made13379VVNmake
in13380INin
2213381CD@card@
OLC13382NPOLC
in13383INin
197813384CD@card@
,13385,,
when13386WRBwhen
it13387PPit
was13388VBDbe
talking13389VVGtalk
about13390INabout
Guam13391NPGuam
,13392,,
in13393INin
3113394CD@card@
OLC13395NPOLC
in13396INin
the13397DTthe
brief13398NNbrief
in13399INin
the13400DTthe
Hechinger13401NPHechinger
case13402NNcase
,13403,,
which13404WDTwhich
was13405VBDbe
the13406DTthe
follow-on13407NNfollow-on
to13408TOto
the13409DTthe
Metropolitan13410NPMetropolitan
Washington13411NPWashington
Authority13412NPAuthority
's13413POS's
case13414NNcase
,13415,,
that13416WDTthat
was13417VBDbe
a13418DTa
very13419JJvery
,13420,,
very13421RBvery
important13422JJimportant
case13423NNcase
.13424SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13425LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
If13426INif
we13427PPwe
conclude13428VVPconclude
that13429IN/thatthat
the13430DTthe
powers13431NNSpower
and13432CCand
duties13433NNSduty
here13434RBhere
are13435VBPbe
primarily13436RBprimarily
local13437JJlocal
...13438:...
and13439CCand
I13440PPI
know13441VVPknow
you13442PPyou
disagree13443VVPdisagree
...13444:...
but13445CCbut
,13446,,
if13447INif
we13448PPwe
conclude13449VVPconclude
that13450IN/thatthat
,13451,,
do13452VVdo
you13453PPyou
lose13454VVlose
?13455SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]13456LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
The13457NPThe
...13458:...
I13459PPI
suspect13460VVPsuspect
that13461IN/thatthat
if13462INif
there13463EXthere
's13464VBZbe
...13465:...
if13466INif
there13467EXthere
's13468VBZbe
an13469DTan
agency13470NNagency
in13471INin
Puerto13472NPPuerto
Rico13473NPRico
that13474WDTthat
's13475VBZbe
dealing13476VVGdeal
with13477INwith
purely13478RBpurely
local13479JJlocal
problems13480NNSproblem
,13481,,
like13482INlike
the13483DTthe
...13484:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13485LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
You13486PPyou
keep13487VVPkeep
...13488:...
[MR. OLSON T.]13489LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...13490:...
like13491INlike
the13492DTthe
article13493NNarticle
...13494:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13495LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...13496:...
you13497PPyou
keep13498VVPkeep
saying13499VVGsay
...13500:...
I13501PPI
'm13502VBPbe
sorry13503JJsorry
to13504TOto
interrupt13505VVinterrupt
.13506SENT.
You13507PPyou
keep13508VVPkeep
saying13509VVGsay
"13510``"
purely13511RBpurely
local13512JJlocal
.13513SENT.
"13514''"
[MR. OLSON T.]13515LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well13516UHWell
,13517,,
primarily13518RBprimarily
,13519,,
I'll13520NPI'll
...13521:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13522LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Okay13523NPOkay
.13524SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]13525LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...13526:...
accept13527VVaccept
that13528IN/thatthat
,13529,,
primarily13530RBprimarily
.13531SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13532LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
There13533EXthere
's13534VBZbe
a13535DTa
big13536JJbig
difference13537NNdifference
between13538INbetween
...13539:...
[MR. OLSON T.]13540LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well13541UHwell
,13542,,
there13543EXthere
's13544VBZbe
a13545DTa
big13546JJbig
...13547:...
it13548PPit
may13549MDmay
be13550VBbe
a13551DTa
big13552JJbig
difference13553NNdifference
and13554CCand
it13555PPit
may13556MDmay
be13557VBbe
important13558JJimportant
in13559INin
this13560DTthis
case13561NNcase
.13562SENT.
Palmore13563NPPalmore
case13564NNcase
was13565VBDbe
talking13566VVGtalk
about13567RBabout
relative13568JJrelative
...13569:...
it13570PPit
was13571VBDbe
n't13572RBn't
purely13573RBpurely
local13574JJlocal
,13575,,
but13576CCbut
it13577PPit
was13578VBDbe
primarily13579RBprimarily
local13580JJlocal
.13581SENT.
The13582DTthe
Court13583NPCourt
used13584VVDuse
exclusively13585RBexclusively
,13586,,
but13587CCbut
I13588PPI
think13589VVPthink
the13590DTthe
Court13591NPCourt
meant13592VVDmean
in13593INin
the13594DTthe
Palmore13595NPPalmore
case13596NNcase
those13597DTthose
courts13598NNScourt
that13599WDTthat
were13600VBDbe
dealing13601VVGdeal
with13602INwith
problems13603NNSproblem
in13604INin
the13605DTthe
District13606NPDistrict
of13607INof
Columbia13608NPColumbia
involving13609VVGinvolve
District13610NPDistrict
of13611INof
Columbia13612NPColumbia
criminal13613JJcriminal
laws13614NNSlaw
.13615SENT.
So13616RBso
if13617INif
your13618PP$your
...13619:...
the13620DTthe
focus13621NNfocus
is13622VBZbe
on13623INon
that13624IN/thatthat
,13625,,
of13626INof
course13627NNcourse
,13628,,
there13629EXthere
are13630VBPbe
state13631NNstate
officials13632NNSofficial
that13633WDTthat
can13634MDcan
enforce13635VVenforce
federal13636JJfederal
law13637NNlaw
.13638SENT.
That13639DTthat
's13640VBZbe
always13641RBalways
been13642VBNbe
the13643DTthe
case13644NNcase
from13645INfrom
the13646DTthe
beginning13647NNbeginning
of13648INof
the13649DTthe
Constitution13650NPConstitution
.13651SENT.
So13652RBso
it13653PPit
is13654VBZbe
primarily13655RBprimarily
what13656WPwhat
's13657VBZbe
being13658VBGbe
involved13659VVNinvolve
here13660RBhere
.13661SENT.
This13662DTthis
is13663VBZbe
the13664DTthe
...13665:...
the13666DTthe
Congressional13667NPCongressional
Budget13668NPBudget
Office13669NPOffice
itself13670PPitself
looked13671VVDlook
at13672INat
this13673DTthis
particular13674JJparticular
statute13675NNstatute
and13676CCand
said13677VVDsay
this13678DTthis
is13679VBZbe
a13680DTa
federal13681JJfederal
office13682NNoffice
.13683SENT.
The13684DTthe
Lebron13685NPLebron
case13686NNcase
that13687WDTthat
looked13688VVDlook
at13689INat
Amtrak13690NPAmtrak
...13691:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13692LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Can13693MDcan
I13694PPI
just13695RBjust
try13696VVPtry
the13697DTthe
question13698NNquestion
again13699RBagain
?13700SENT?
If13701INif
we13702PPwe
conclude13703VVPconclude
it13704PPit
's13705VBZbe
primarily13706RBprimarily
local13707JJlocal
,13708,,
do13709VVPdo
you13710PPyou
have13711VHPhave
an13712DTan
alternative13713JJalternative
argument13714NNargument
or13715CCor
do13716VVdo
you13717PPyou
lose13718VVlose
?13719SENT?
[MR. OLSON T.]13720LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well13721UHwell
,13722,,
I13723PPI
do13724VVPdo
n't13725RBn't
...13726:...
I13727PPI
do13728VVPdo
n't13729RBn't
...13730:...
I13731PPI
think13732VVPthink
that13733IN/thatthat
it13734PPit
can13735MDcan
't13736RB't
conceivably13737RBconceivably
be13738VBbe
thought13739VVNthink
of13740INof
as13741RBas
primarily13742RBprimarily
local13743JJlocal
given13744VVNgive
the13745DTthe
scope13746NNscope
of13747INof
the13748DTthe
authority13749NNauthority
,13750,,
but13751CCbut
I13752PPI
'm13753VBPbe
imagining13754VVGimagine
a13755DTa
hypothetical13756JJhypothetical
situation13757NNsituation
where13758WRBwhere
you13759PPyou
might13760MDmight
have13761VHhave
a13762DTa
small13763JJsmall
unit13764NNunit
of13765INof
...13766:...
of13767INof
government13768NNgovernment
,13769,,
a13770DTa
subdivision13771NNsubdivision
of13772INof
Puerto13773NPPuerto
Rico13774NPRico
that13775WDTthat
was13776VBDbe
purely13777RBpurely
a13778DTa
municipal13779JJmunicipal
problem13780NNproblem
,13781,,
yes13782UHyes
,13783,,
that13784WDTthat
could13785MDcould
be13786VBbe
a13787DTa
...13788:...
that13789WDTthat
could13790MDcould
not13791RBnot
invoke13792VVinvoke
the13793DTthe
Appointments13794NNSappointment
Clause13795NNclause
,13796,,
but13797CCbut
...13798:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]13799LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Mr13800NPMr
.13801SENT.
Olson13802NPOlson
,13803,,
do13804VVPdo
n't13805RBn't
lose13806VVlose
the13807DTthe
de13808FWde
facto13809FWfacto
officer13810NNofficer
argument13811NNargument
.13812SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]13813LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Yes13814NPYes
.13815SENT.
The13816DTthe
de13817FWde
facto13818FWfacto
...13819:...
this13820DTthis
Court13821NPCourt
decided13822VVDdecide
2413823CD@card@
years13824NNSyear
ago13825RBago
unanimously13826RBunanimously
,13827,,
in13828INin
an13829DTan
opinion13830NNopinion
by13831INby
...13832:...
written13833VVNwrite
by13834INby
the13835DTthe
then13836RBthen
Chief13837JJchief
Justice13838NPJustice
,13839,,
that13840IN/thatthat
when13841WRBwhen
there13842EXthere
is13843VBZbe
a13844DTa
decision13845NNdecision
,13846,,
a13847DTa
challenge13848NNchallenge
,13849,,
a13850DTa
timely13851JJtimely
challenge13852NNchallenge
to13853TOto
an13854DTan
Appointments13855NNSappointment
Clause13856NNclause
violation13857NNviolation
,13858,,
one13859CDone
who13860WPwho
makes13861VVZmake
...13862:...
to13863TOto
use13864VVuse
the13865DTthe
words13866NNSword
of13867INof
that13868DTthat
Court13869NPCourt
...13870:...
one13871CDone
who13872WPwho
makes13873VVZmake
a13874DTa
timely13875JJtimely
challenge13876NNchallenge
to13877TOto
the13878DTthe
constitutional13879JJconstitutional
validity13880NNvalidity
of13881INof
the13882DTthe
appointment13883NNappointment
of13884INof
an13885DTan
officer13886NNofficer
who13887WPwho
adjudicates13888VVZadjudicate
his13889PP$his
case13890NNcase
and13891CCand
,13892,,
legislative13893JJlegislative
or13894CCor
adjudicative13895JJadjudicative
...13896:...
these13897DTthese
are13898VBPbe
Article13899NPArticle
I13900NPI
issues13901NNSissue
,13902,,
so13903INso
there13904EXthere
really13905RBreally
is13906VBZbe
n't13907RBn't
any13908DTany
difference13909NNdifference
there13910RBthere
...13911:...
is13912VBZbe
entitled13913VVNentitle
to13914TOto
a13915DTa
decision13916NNdecision
on13917INon
the13918DTthe
merits13919NNSmerit
and13920CCand
whatever13921WDTwhatever
relief13922NNrelief
may13923MDmay
be13924VBbe
appropriate13925JJappropriate
.13926SENT.
I13927PPI
heard13928VVDhear
the13929DTthe
government13930NNgovernment
say13931VVPsay
just13932RBjust
a13933DTa
few13934JJfew
minutes13935NNSminute
ago13936RBago
that13937IN/thatthat
we13938PPwe
've13939VHPhave
done13940VVNdo
all13941PDTall
these13942DTthese
things13943NNSthing
,13944,,
we13945PPwe
've13946VHPhave
made13947VVNmake
all13948PDTall
those13949DTthose
decisions13950NNSdecision
,13951,,
so13952RBso
put13953VVDput
the13954DTthe
Constitution13955NPConstitution
aside13956RPaside
,13957,,
let13958VVlet
us13959PPus
continue13960VVcontinue
to13961TOto
do13962VVdo
it13963PPit
.13964SENT.
Let13965VVlet
us13966PPus
have13967VHPhave
the13968DTthe
fruits13969NNSfruit
of13970INof
the13971DTthe
decisions13972NNSdecision
that13973IN/thatthat
we13974PPwe
made13975VVDmake
with13976INwith
unconstitutional13977JJunconstitutional
officers13978NNSofficer
who13979WPwho
could13980MDcould
never13981RBnever
have13982VHhave
even13983RBeven
filed13984VVNfile
...13985:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]13986LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I13987PPI
think13988VVPthink
that13989IN/thatthat
they13990PPthey
are13991VBPbe
making13992VVGmake
a13993DTa
distinction13994NNdistinction
between13995INbetween
adjudicatory13996JJadjudicatory
and13997CCand
legislative13998JJlegislative
decisions13999NNSdecision
.14000SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]14001LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
I14002PPI
do14003VVPdo
n't14004RBn't
think14005VVthink
that14006DTthat
...14007:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]14008LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
They14009PPthey
seem14010VVPseem
to14011TOto
be14012VBbe
saying14013VVGsay
that14014IN/thatthat
when14015WRBwhen
it14016PPit
comes14017VVZcome
to14018TOto
legislative14019JJlegislative
officers14020NNSofficer
,14021,,
that14022WDTthat
we14023PPwe
have14024VHPhave
applied14025VVNapply
the14026DTthe
de14027FWde
facto14028FWfacto
officer14029NNofficer
status14030NNstatus
.14031SENT.
In14032INin
more14033JJRmore
recent14034JJrecent
times14035NNStime
,14036,,
you14037PPyou
're14038VBPbe
absolutely14039RBabsolutely
right14040RBright
,14041,,
with14042INwith
adjudicatory14043JJadjudicatory
officers14044NNSofficer
,14045,,
we14046PPwe
have14047VHPhave
said14048VVNsay
no14049RBno
,14050,,
you14051PPyou
have14052VHPhave
to14053TOto
give14054VVgive
people14055NNSpeople
a14056DTa
new14057JJnew
hearing14058NNhearing
.14059SENT.
So14060INso
deal14061NNdeal
with14062INwith
that14063DTthat
distinction14064NNdistinction
...14065:...
[MR. OLSON T.]14066LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Well14067UHWell
...14068:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]14069LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...14070:...
and14071CCand
deal14072NNdeal
with14073INwith
why14074WRBwhy
that14075DTthat
's14076VBZbe
wrong14077JJwrong
.14078SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]14079LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
...14080:...
I14081PPI
do14082VVPdo
n't14083RBn't
think14084VVthink
that14085IN/thatthat
there14086EXthere
is14087VBZbe
a14088DTa
valid14089JJvalid
distinction14090NNdistinction
in14091INin
...14092:...
in14093INin
a14094DTa
vacuum14095NNvacuum
between14096INbetween
an14097DTan
adjudicatory14098JJadjudicatory
process14099NNprocess
.14100SENT.
Look14101VVlook
at14102INat
the14103DTthe
Lucia14104NPLucia
case14105NNcase
,14106,,
was14107VBDbe
an14108DTan
Administrative14109NPAdministrative
Law14110NPLaw
Judge14111NPJudge
that14112WDTthat
was14113VBDbe
exercising14114VVGexercise
what14115WPwhat
the14116DTthe
Court14117NNcourt
perceived14118VVNperceive
as14119INas
partially14120RBpartially
adjudicative14121JJadjudicative
problems14122NNSproblem
,14123,,
but14124CCbut
also14125RBalso
conducting14126VVGconduct
Article14127NPArticle
I14128NPI
activities14129NNSactivity
,14130,,
enforcing14131VVGenforce
the14132DTthe
laws14133NNSlaw
of14134INof
the14135DTthe
United14136NPUnited
States14137NPSStates
.14138SENT.
And14139CCand
this14140DTthis
agency14141NNagency
has14142VHZhave
that14143DTthat
same14144JJsame
authority14145NNauthority
.14146SENT.
It14147PPit
overlaps14148VVZoverlap
both14149DTboth
.14150SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]14151LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But14152CCbut
the14153DTthe
Ryder14154NPRyder
case14155NNcase
,14156,,
on14157INon
which14158WDTwhich
you14159PPyou
placed14160VVDplace
such14161JJsuch
reliance14162NNreliance
,14163,,
it14164PPit
...14165:...
it14166PPit
was14167VBDbe
qualified14168VVNqualify
.14169SENT.
It14170PPit
said14171VVDsay
the14172DTthe
defendant14173NNdefendant
could14174MDcould
object14175VVobject
to14176TOto
the14177DTthe
mode14178NNmode
of14179INof
appointment14180NNappointment
of14181INof
a14182DTa
judge14183NNjudge
who14184WPwho
adjudicates14185VVZadjudicate
his14186PP$his
case14187NNcase
.14188SENT.
And14189CCand
this14190DTthis
Board14191NPBoard
is14192VBZbe
not14193RBnot
adjudicating14194VVGadjudicate
any14195DTany
cases14196NNScase
.14197SENT.
The14198DTthe
...14199:...
the14200DTthe
federal14201JJfederal
district14202NNdistrict
court14203NNcourt
is14204VBZbe
.14205SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]14206LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
Justice14207NPJustice
Ginsburg14208NPGinsburg
,14209,,
I14210PPI
would14211MDwould
submit14212VVsubmit
that14213IN/thatthat
the14214DTthe
...14215:...
this14216DTthis
Board14217NPBoard
is14218VBZbe
both14219DTboth
adjudicating14220VVGadjudicate
and14221CCand
enforcing14222VVGenforce
the14223DTthe
laws14224NNSlaw
in14225INin
the14226DTthe
same14227JJsame
sense14228NNsense
,14229,,
and14230CCand
has14231VHZhave
many14232JJmany
of14233INof
the14234DTthe
same14235JJsame
powers14236NNSpower
that14237IN/thatthat
the14238DTthe
administrative14239JJadministrative
law14240NNlaw
judge14241NNjudge
had14242VHDhave
in14243INin
the14244DTthe
Lucia14245NPLucia
case14246NNcase
,14247,,
and14248CCand
so14249RBso
that14250IN/thatthat
that14251DTthat
distinction14252NNdistinction
simply14253RBsimply
does14254VVZdo
n't14255RBn't
hold14256VVhold
up14257RPup
.14258SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]14259LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
It14260PPit
was14261VBDbe
acting14262VVGact
on14263INon
behalf14264NNbehalf
of14265INof
the14266DTthe
debtor14267JJdebtor
agency14268NNagency
in14269INin
Puerto14270NPPuerto
Rico14271NPRico
.14272SENT.
They14273PPthey
...14274:...
it14275PPit
's14276VBZbe
acting14277VVGact
as14278INas
a14279DTa
kind14280NNkind
of14281INof
a14282DTa
petitioner14283NNpetitioner
.14284SENT.
It14285PPit
's14286VBZbe
not14287RBnot
an14288DTan
adjudicator14289NNadjudicator
.14290SENT.
[MR. OLSON T.]14291LOC[MR. OLSON T.]
That14292DTthat
's14293VBZbe
one14294CDone
of14295INof
the14296DTthe
...14297:...
one14298CDone
small14299JJsmall
part14300NNpart
of14301INof
what14302WPwhat
PROMESA14303NPPROMESA
does14304VVZdo
.14305SENT.
That14306DTthat
has14307VHZhave
to14308TOto
do14309VVdo
with14310INwith
165,00014311CD@card@
claims14312NNSclaim
.14313SENT.
It14314PPit
does14315VVZdo
n't14316RBn't
have14317VHhave
to14318TOto
do14319VVdo
with14320INwith
overturning14321VVGoverturn
the14322DTthe
...14323:...
the14324DTthe
budget14325NNbudget
,14326,,
changing14327VVGchange
the14328DTthe
financial14329JJfinancial
structure14330NNstructure
of14331INof
Puerto14332NPPuerto
Rico14333NPRico
,14334,,
suing14335VVGsue
in14336INin
...14337:...
in14338INin
federal14339JJfederal
courts14340NNScourt
citizens14341NNScitizen
of14342INof
the14343DTthe
United14344NPUnited
States14345NPSStates
outside14346NNoutside
of14347INof
Puerto14348NPPuerto
Rico14349NPRico
in14350INin
connection14351NNconnection
with14352INwith
financial14353JJfinancial
claims14354NNSclaim
,14355,,
claw-back14356NNclaw-back
claims14357NNSclaim
,14358,,
they14359PPthey
call14360VVPcall
them14361PPthem
in14362INin
the14363DTthe
financial14364JJfinancial
insolvency14365NNinsolvency
concept14366NNconcept
.14367SENT.
If14368INif
one14369CDone
were14370VBDbe
to14371TOto
look14372VVlook
at14373INat
all14374DTall
of14375INof
the14376DTthe
authorities14377NNSauthority
,14378,,
and14379CCand
I14380PPI
was14381VBDbe
...14382:...
have14383VHPhave
to14384TOto
finish14385VVfinish
with14386INwith
the14387DTthe
point14388NNpoint
that14389IN/thatthat
these14390DTthese
officials14391NNSofficial
are14392VBPbe
appointed14393VVNappoint
by14394INby
the14395DTthe
President14396NPPresident
of14397INof
the14398DTthe
United14399NPUnited
States14400NPSStates
,14401,,
an14402DTan
officer14403NNofficer
of14404INof
the14405DTthe
United14406NPUnited
States14407NPStates
,14408,,
removable14409JJremovable
by14410INby
the14411DTthe
President14412NPPresident
,14413,,
and14414CCand
that14415IN/thatthat
what14416WPwhat
this14417DTthis
Court14418NPCourt
said14419VVDsay
in14420INin
the14421DTthe
Bowsher14422NPBowsher
case14423NNcase
,14424,,
that14425WDTthat
means14426VVZmean
that14427IN/thatthat
that14428DTthat
's14429VBZbe
the14430DTthe
official14431NNofficial
that14432IN/thatthat
they14433PPthey
must14434MDmust
fear14435VVfear
and14436CCand
therefore14437RBtherefore
obey14438VVPobey
,14439,,
and14440CCand
is14441VBZbe
supervised14442VVNsupervise
in14443INin
Section14444NPSection
214814445CD@card@
,14446,,
212114447CD@card@
,14448,,
212714449CD@card@
,14450,,
1914451CD@card@
214314452CD@card@
.14453SENT.
These14454DTthese
are14455VBPbe
reports14456NNSreport
,14457,,
recommendations14458NNSrecommendation
,14459,,
responsibilities14460NNSresponsibility
that14461IN/thatthat
the14462DTthe
oversight14463NNoversight
board14464NNboard
must14465MDmust
constantly14466RBconstantly
give14467VVgive
to14468TOto
officials14469NNSofficial
of14470INof
the14471DTthe
United14472NPUnited
States14473NPStates
and14474CCand
,14475,,
therefore14476RBtherefore
,14477,,
supervision14478NNsupervision
.14479SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]14480LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank14481VVthank
you14482PPyou
,14483,,
counsel14484NNcounsel
.14485SENT.
Ms14486NNMs
.14487SENT.
Mendez-Colberg14488NPMendez-Colberg
.14489SENT.
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]14490LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Mr14491NPMr
.14492SENT.
Chief14493NPChief
Justice14494NPJustice
,14495,,
and14496CCand
may14497MDmay
it14498PPit
please14499VVplease
the14500DTthe
Court14501NPCourt
:14502::
I14503PPI
would14504MDwould
like14505VVlike
to14506TOto
address14507VVaddress
the14508DTthe
issue14509NNissue
of14510INof
the14511DTthe
Insular14512JJinsular
Cases14513NNScase
,14514,,
the14515DTthe
remedy14516NNremedy
,14517,,
and14518CCand
also14519RBalso
some14520DTsome
of14521INof
the14522DTthe
questions14523NNSquestion
...14524:...
the14525DTthe
questions14526NNSquestion
of14527INof
the14528DTthe
Court14529NPCourt
.14530SENT.
If14531INif
we14532PPwe
stand14533VVPstand
in14534INin
front14535NNfront
of14536INof
this14537DTthis
building14538NNbuilding
,14539,,
we14540PPwe
will14541MDwill
see14542VVsee
the14543DTthe
words14544NNSword
"14545``"
equal14546JJequal
justice14547NNjustice
under14548INunder
law14549NNlaw
.14550SENT.
"14551``"
The14552DTthe
Insular14553JJinsular
Cases14554NNScase
stretch14555VVPstretch
that14556IN/thatthat
tenet14557NNtenet
into14558INinto
its14559PP$its
breaking14560JJbreaking
point14561NNpoint
.14562SENT.
The14563DTthe
court-made14564JJcourt-made
doctrine14565NNdoctrine
of14566INof
territorial14567JJterritorial
incorporation14568NNincorporation
means14569VVZmean
that14570IN/thatthat
when14571WRBwhen
my14572PP$my
client14573NNclient
,14574,,
and14575CCand
even14576RBeven
myself14577PPmyself
,14578,,
return14579VVreturn
to14580TOto
Puerto14581NPPuerto
Rico14582NPRico
,14583,,
we14584PPwe
will14585MDwill
have14586VHhave
a14587DTa
lesser14588JJRlesser
set14589NNset
of14590INof
constitutional14591JJconstitutional
rights14592NNSright
than14593INthan
what14594WPwhat
we14595PPwe
have14596VHPhave
standing14597NNstanding
here14598RBhere
today14599NNtoday
.14600SENT.
On14601INon
the14602DTthe
other14603JJother
hand14604NNhand
,14605,,
the14606DTthe
First14607NPFirst
Circuit14608NPCircuit
decided14609VVDdecide
that14610IN/thatthat
my14611PP$my
clients14612NNSclient
suffered14613VVDsuffer
a14614DTa
constitutional14615JJconstitutional
injury14616NNinjury
,14617,,
but14618CCbut
still14619RBstill
they14620PPthey
were14621VBDbe
left14622VVNleave
without14623INwithout
a14624DTa
remedy14625NNremedy
.14626SENT.
Equal14627JJequal
justice14628NNjustice
under14629INunder
law14630NNlaw
should14631MDshould
mean14632VVmean
the14633DTthe
same14634JJsame
thing14635NNthing
here14636RBhere
in14637INin
D14638NPD
.14639SENT.
C14640LSc
.14641SENT.
than14642INthan
in14643INin
Puerto14644NPPuerto
Rico14645NPRico
.14646SENT.
It14647PPit
should14648MDshould
reject14649VVreject
ideas14650NNSidea
grounded14651VVNground
on14652INon
class14653NNclass
...14654:...
it14655PPit
should14656MDshould
reject14657VVreject
classifications14658NNSclassification
grounded14659VVNground
in14660INin
ideas14661NNSidea
of14662INof
alien14663JJalien
races14664NNSrace
and14665CCand
savage14666JJsavage
people14667NNSpeople
.14668SENT.
It14669PPit
should14670MDshould
also14671RBalso
mean14672VVmean
that14673IN/thatthat
when14674WRBwhen
there14675EXthere
is14676VBZbe
a14677DTa
constitutional14678JJconstitutional
injury14679NNinjury
,14680,,
justice14681NNjustice
requires14682VVZrequire
a14683DTa
remedy14684NNremedy
.14685SENT.
Now14686RBnow
,14687,,
in14688INin
this14689DTthis
case14690NNcase
,14691,,
the14692DTthe
...14693:...
the14694DTthe
First14695NPFirst
Circuit14696NPCircuit
stated14697VVDstate
correctly14698RBcorrectly
that14699IN/thatthat
the14700DTthe
Insular14701JJinsular
Cases14702NNScase
hover14703VVPhover
like14704INlike
a14705DTa
dark14706JJdark
cloud14707NNcloud
over14708INover
this14709DTthis
case14710NNcase
.14711SENT.
And14712CCand
it14713PPit
is14714VBZbe
true14715JJtrue
,14716,,
because14717INbecause
the14718DTthe
opposing14719JJopposing
parties14720NNSparty
have14721VHPhave
been14722VBNbe
relying14723VVGrely
on14724INon
the14725DTthe
Insular14726JJinsular
Cases14727NNScase
since14728INsince
the14729DTthe
beginning14730NNbeginning
of14731INof
the14732DTthe
proceedings14733NNSproceeding
to14734TOto
establish14735VVestablish
that14736IN/thatthat
even14737RBeven
the14738DTthe
structural14739JJstructural
provisions14740NNSprovision
of14741INof
the14742DTthe
Constitution14743NPConstitution
do14744VVPdo
n't14745RBn't
apply14746VVapply
to14747TOto
the14748DTthe
people14749NNSpeople
of14750INof
Puerto14751NPPuerto
Rico14752NPRico
because14753INbecause
...14754:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]14755LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I14756PPI
think14757VVPthink
here14758RBhere
...14759:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]14760LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I14761PPI
understood14762VVDunderstand
...14763:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]14764LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
...14765:...
everybody14766NNeverybody
was14767VBDbe
...14768:...
everybody14769NNeverybody
was14770VBDbe
agreeing14771VVGagree
that14772IN/thatthat
the14773DTthe
Article14774NNarticle
I14775PPI
...14776:...
Article14777NPArticle
II14778NPII
does14779VVZdo
apply14780VVapply
.14781SENT.
And14782CCand
so14783RBso
whether14784INwhether
you14785PPyou
have14786VHPhave
the14787DTthe
Insular14788JJinsular
Cases14789NNScase
or14790CCor
not14791RBnot
,14792,,
and14793CCand
I14794PPI
agree14795VVPagree
they14796PPthey
're14797VBPbe
a14798DTa
dark14799JJdark
cloud14800NNcloud
,14801,,
but14802CCbut
the14803DTthe
...14804:...
the14805DTthe
...14806:...
the14807DTthe
...14808:...
it14809PPit
does14810VVZdo
n't14811RBn't
matter14812VVmatter
here14813RBhere
because14814INbecause
the14815DTthe
provision14816NNprovision
of14817INof
the14818DTthe
Constitution14819NPConstitution
does14820VVZdo
apply14821VVapply
.14822SENT.
And14823CCand
I14824PPI
thought14825VVDthink
what14826WPwhat
was14827VBDbe
more14828JJRmore
,14829,,
which14830WDTwhich
I14831PPI
've14832VHPhave
been14833VBNbe
trying14834VVGtry
to14835TOto
work14836VVwork
out14837RPout
,14838,,
and14839CCand
you14840PPyou
may14841MDmay
have14842VHhave
looked14843VVNlook
into14844INinto
this14845DTthis
,14846,,
is14847VBZbe
what14848WPwhat
about14849INabout
the14850DTthe
Federal14851NPFederal
Relations14852NPSRelations
Act14853NPAct
?14854SENT?
You14855PPyou
see14856VVPsee
,14857,,
if14858INif
...14859:...
if14860INif
,14861,,
in14862INin
fact14863NNfact
,14864,,
you14865PPyou
...14866:...
you14867PPyou
would14868MDwould
be14869VBbe
the14870DTthe
one14871CDone
who14872WPwho
might14873MDmight
have14874VHhave
thought14875VVNthink
of14876INof
this14877DTthis
.14878SENT.
But14879CCbut
it14880PPit
does14881VVZdo
give14882VVgive
these14883DTthese
powers14884NNSpower
to14885TOto
deal14886VVdeal
,14887,,
and14888CCand
the14889DTthe
deal14890NNdeal
is14891VBZbe
the14892DTthe
legislature14893NNlegislature
of14894INof
Puerto14895NPPuerto
Rico14896NPRico
and14897CCand
the14898DTthe
governor14899NNgovernor
do14900VVPdo
this14901DTthis
.14902SENT.
But14903CCbut
there14904EXthere
was14905VBDbe
a14906DTa
reservation14907NNreservation
.14908SENT.
There14909EXthere
was14910VBDbe
a14911DTa
reservation14912NNreservation
for14913INfor
the14914DTthe
indebtedness14915NNindebtedness
.14916SENT.
And14917CCand
that14918DTthat
reservation14919NNreservation
was14920VBDbe
eventually14921RBeventually
repealed14922VVNrepeal
in14923INin
'14924'''
6114925CD@card@
.14926SENT.
And14927CCand
when14928WRBwhen
it14929PPit
was14930VBDbe
repealed14931VVNrepeal
,14932,,
the14933DTthe
legislature14934NNlegislature
passed14935VVDpass
a14936DTa
...14937:...
they14938PPthey
passed14939VVDpass
a14940DTa
constitutional14941JJconstitutional
amendment14942NNamendment
in14943INin
Puerto14944NPPuerto
Rico14945NPRico
promising14946VVGpromise
that14947IN/thatthat
they14948PPthey
would14949MDwould
pay14950VVpay
creditors14951NNScreditor
and14952CCand
that14953IN/thatthat
they14954PPthey
had14955VHDhave
some14956DTsome
priorities14957NNSpriority
and14958CCand
so14959RBso
forth14960RBforth
.14961SENT.
Now14962RBnow
is14963VBZbe
that14964IN/thatthat
relevant14965JJrelevant
?14966SENT?
I14967PPI
've14968VHPhave
begun14969VVNbegin
to14970TOto
think14971VVthink
that14972IN/thatthat
the14973DTthe
partnership14974NNpartnership
,14975,,
the14976DTthe
Estado14977NPEstado
Libre14978NPLibre
Asociado14979NPAsociado
,14980,,
is14981VBZbe
...14982:...
is14983VBZbe
...14984:...
is14985VBZbe
more14986RBRmore
served14987VVNserve
by14988INby
considering14989VVGconsider
this14990DTthis
a14991DTa
local14992JJlocal
law14993NNlaw
than14994INthan
considering14995VVGconsider
it14996PPit
a14997DTa
federal14998JJfederal
law14999NNlaw
,15000,,
because15001INbecause
if15002INif
a15003DTa
...15004:...
if15005INif
it15006PPit
's15007VBZbe
a15008DTa
federal15009JJfederal
law15010NNlaw
,15011,,
it15012PPit
really15013RBreally
is15014VBZbe
hard15015JJhard
to15016TOto
reconcile15017VVreconcile
with15018INwith
the15019DTthe
FRA15020NNFRA
,15021,,
but15022CCbut
not15023RBnot
so15024RBso
hard15025JJhard
if15026INif
it15027PPit
's15028VBZbe
a15029DTa
local15030JJlocal
law15031NNlaw
.15032SENT.
Have15033VHPhave
you15034PPyou
thought15035VVNthink
about15036INabout
it15037PPit
at15038INat
all15039DTall
?15040SENT?
If15041INif
you15042PPyou
have15043VHPhave
n't15044RBn't
thought15045VVNthink
of15046INof
it15047PPit
,15048,,
forget15049VVforget
it15050PPit
.15051SENT.
[15052SYM[
LAUGHTER15053NNlaughter
]15054SYM]
[JUSTICE BREYER]15055LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I15056PPI
'm15057VBPbe
just15058RBjust
...15059:...
I'm15060NPI'm
...15061:...
I'm15062NPI'm
...15063:...
I'm15064NPI'm
...15065:...
I'm15066NNI'm
...15067:...
I15068PPI
have15069VHPhave
a15070DTa
tough15071JJtough
problem15072NNproblem
in15073INin
my15074PP$my
mind15075NNmind
on15076INon
that15077DTthat
.15078SENT.
And15079CCand
if15080INif
you15081PPyou
have15082VHPhave
thought15083VVNthink
of15084INof
it15085PPit
,15086,,
I15087PPI
'd15088MDwould
appreciate15089VVappreciate
what15090WPwhat
you15091PPyou
think15092VVPthink
.15093SENT.
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15094LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Well15095UHWell
,15096,,
Your15097PP$your
Honor15098NPHonor
,15099,,
we15100PPwe
would15101MDwould
forget15102VVforget
about15103INabout
it15104PPit
,15105,,
but15106CCbut
the15107DTthe
problem15108NNproblem
here15109RBhere
is15110VBZbe
that15111IN/thatthat
,15112,,
actually15113RBactually
,15114,,
what15115WPwhat
Congress15116NPCongress
did15117VVDdo
was15118VBDbe
to15119TOto
,15120,,
yes15121UHyes
,15122,,
say15123VVPsay
that15124IN/thatthat
this15125DTthis
...15126:...
that15127IN/thatthat
this15128DTthis
are15129VBPbe
territorial15130JJterritorial
officers15131NNSofficer
,15132,,
but15133CCbut
it15134PPit
actually15135RBactually
gave15136VVDgive
this15137DTthis
...15138:...
the15139DTthe
oversight15140NNoversight
board15141NNboard
powers15142NNSpower
that15143WDTthat
are15144VBPbe
not15145RBnot
necessarily15146RBnecessarily
what15147WPwhat
power15148NNpower
...15149:...
what15150WPwhat
the15151DTthe
powers15152NNSpower
of15153INof
a15154DTa
...15155:...
of15156INof
a15157DTa
territorial15158JJterritorial
officer15159NNofficer
are15160VBPbe
considered15161VVNconsider
to15162TOto
be15163VBbe
.15164SENT.
They15165PPthey
...15166:...
the15167DTthe
oversight15168NNoversight
board15169NNboard
has15170VHZhave
the15171DTthe
authority15172NNauthority
,15173,,
and15174CCand
as15175INas
Mr15176NPMr
.15177SENT.
Olson15178NPOlson
mentioned15179VVDmention
,15180,,
has15181VHZhave
the15182DTthe
authority15183NNauthority
to15184TOto
file15185VVfile
this15186DTthis
bankruptcy15187NNbankruptcy
proceedings15188NNSproceeding
,15189,,
which15190WDTwhich
is15191VBZbe
a15192DTa
federal15193JJfederal
power15194NNpower
,15195,,
on15196INon
behalf15197NNbehalf
of15198INof
the15199DTthe
government15200NNgovernment
.15201SENT.
But15202CCbut
,15203,,
also15204RBalso
,15205,,
we15206PPwe
see15207VVPsee
that15208IN/thatthat
they15209PPthey
have15210VHPhave
the15211DTthe
authority15212NNauthority
to15213TOto
impair15214VVimpair
contracts15215NNScontract
...15216:...
which15217WDTwhich
is15218VBZbe
something15219NNsomething
that15220WDTthat
was15221VBDbe
n't15222RBn't
mentioned15223VVNmention
before15224INbefore
...15225:...
impair15226VVimpair
contracts15227NNScontract
even15228RBeven
outside15229JJoutside
of15230INof
the15231DTthe
...15232:...
of15233INof
the15234DTthe
scope15235NNscope
of15236INof
the15237DTthe
bankruptcy15238NNbankruptcy
proceedings15239NNSproceeding
,15240,,
which15241WDTwhich
is15242VBZbe
in15243INin
the15244DTthe
Title15245NPTitle
II15246NPII
...15247:...
II15248NPII
of15249INof
PROMESA15250NPPROMESA
.15251SENT.
If15252INif
the15253DTthe
Board15254NPBoard
understands15255VVZunderstand
that15256IN/thatthat
a15257DTa
contract15258NNcontract
may15259MDmay
...15260:...
that15261IN/thatthat
the15262DTthe
government15263NNgovernment
...15264:...
by15265INby
the15266DTthe
government15267NNgovernment
of15268INof
Puerto15269NPPuerto
Rico15270NPRico
with15271INwith
other15272JJother
parties15273NNSparty
is15274VBZbe
inconsistent15275JJinconsistent
with15276INwith
the15277DTthe
provisions15278NNSprovision
of15279INof
PROMESA15280NPPROMESA
,15281,,
it15282PPit
can15283MDcan
...15284:...
it15285PPit
can15286MDcan
...15287:...
it15288PPit
can15289MDcan
even15290RBeven
prevent15291VVprevent
the15292DTthe
execution15293NNexecution
of15294INof
those15295DTthose
...15296:...
of15297INof
those15298DTthose
contracts15299NNScontract
.15300SENT.
So15301RBso
that15302DTthat
is15303VBZbe
a15304DTa
very15305RBvery
significant15306JJsignificant
power15307NNpower
among15308INamong
the15309DTthe
other15310JJother
powers15311NNSpower
that15312IN/thatthat
the15313DTthe
oversight15314NNoversight
board15315NNboard
has15316VHZhave
that15317RBthat
not15318RBnot
even15319RBeven
the15320DTthe
...15321:...
the15322DTthe
government15323NNgovernment
,15324,,
the15325DTthe
local15326JJlocal
government15327NNgovernment
of15328INof
Puerto15329NPPuerto
Rico15330NPRico
,15331,,
has15332VHZhave
.15333SENT.
Now15334RBnow
I15335PPI
do15336VVPdo
want15337VVwant
to15338TOto
...15339:...
to15340TOto
...15341:...
to15342TOto
...15343:...
to15344TOto
stress15345VVstress
on15346INon
the15347DTthe
issue15348NNissue
of15349INof
the15350DTthe
Insular15351JJinsular
Cases15352NNScase
,15353,,
because15354INbecause
it15355PPit
is15356VBZbe
important15357JJimportant
for15358INfor
the15359DTthe
people15360NNSpeople
of15361INof
Puerto15362NPPuerto
Rico15363NPRico
and15364CCand
for15365INfor
my15366PP$my
clients15367NNSclient
.15368SENT.
This15369DTthis
is15370VBZbe
a15371DTa
...15372:...
a15373DTa
doctrine15374NNdoctrine
that15375WDTthat
has15376VHZhave
been15377VBNbe
,15378,,
well15379RBwell
,15380,,
11815381CD@card@
years15382NNSyear
,15383,,
that15384WDTthat
it15385PPit
...15386:...
that15387WDTthat
has15388VHZhave
been15389VBNbe
...15390:...
that15391WDTthat
has15392VHZhave
been15393VBNbe
good15394JJgood
law15395NNlaw
.15396SENT.
And15397CCand
,15398,,
here15399RBhere
,15400,,
I15401PPI
want15402VVPwant
to15403TOto
stress15404VVstress
that15405IN/thatthat
it15406PPit
is15407VBZbe
a15408DTa
...15409:...
it15410PPit
is15411VBZbe
a15412DTa
matter15413NNmatter
of15414INof
overruling15415VVGoverrule
the15416DTthe
Insular15417JJinsular
Cases15418NNScase
,15419,,
and15420CCand
the15421DTthe
Doctrine15422NNdoctrine
of15423INof
Territorial15424JJterritorial
Incorporation15425NNincorporation
,15426,,
it15427PPit
is15428VBZbe
a15429DTa
matter15430NNmatter
of15431INof
constitutional15432JJconstitutional
and15433CCand
law15434NNlaw
,15435,,
but15436CCbut
also15437RBalso
a15438DTa
matter15439NNmatter
of15440INof
who15441WPwho
the15442DTthe
United15443NPUnited
States15444NPSStates
is15445VBZbe
as15446RBas
a15447DTa
nation15448NNnation
.15449SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]15450LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well15451UHWell
,15452,,
but15453CCbut
Justice15454NPJustice
...15455:...
as15456INas
Justice15457NPJustice
Breyer15458NPBreyer
has15459VHZhave
pointed15460VVNpoint
out15461RPout
,15462,,
none15463NNnone
of15464INof
the15465DTthe
other15466JJother
parties15467NNSparty
rely15468VVPrely
on15469INon
the15470DTthe
Insular15471JJinsular
Cases15472NNScase
in15473INin
any15474DTany
way15475NNway
.15476SENT.
So15477RBso
it15478PPit
would15479MDwould
be15480VBbe
very15481RBvery
unusual15482JJunusual
for15483INfor
us15484PPus
to15485TOto
address15486VVaddress
them15487PPthem
in15488INin
this15489DTthis
case15490NNcase
,15491,,
would15492MDwould
n't15493RBn't
it15494PPit
?15495SENT?
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15496LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Well15497UHWell
,15498,,
Your15499PP$your
Honor15500NPHonor
,15501,,
they15502PPthey
relied15503VVDrely
on15504INon
the15505DTthe
Insular15506JJinsular
Cases15507NNScase
since15508INsince
the15509DTthe
beginning15510NNbeginning
of15511INof
the15512DTthe
proceedings15513NNSproceeding
.15514SENT.
Actually15515RBactually
,15516,,
the15517DTthe
...15518:...
the15519DTthe
unsecured15520JJunsecured
creditor15521NNcreditor
...15522:...
creditors15523NNScreditor
are15524VBPbe
still15525RBstill
relying15526VVGrely
on15527INon
the15528DTthe
Insular15529JJinsular
Cases15530NNScase
at15531INat
this15532DTthis
point15533NNpoint
.15534SENT.
Now15535RBnow
it15536PPit
is15537VBZbe
very15538RBvery
convenient15539JJconvenient
for15540INfor
the15541DTthe
other15542JJother
parties15543NNSparty
to15544TOto
not15545RBnot
...15546:...
to15547TOto
rely15548VVrely
on15549INon
the15550DTthe
Insular15551JJinsular
Cases15552NNScase
in15553INin
the15554DTthe
lower15555JJRlow
courts15556NNScourt
,15557,,
where15558WRBwhere
there15559EXthere
is15560VBZbe
no15561DTno
authority15562NNauthority
to15563TOto
overrule15564VVoverrule
those15565DTthose
cases15566NNScase
,15567,,
but15568CCbut
that15569DTthat
...15570:...
but15571CCbut
then15572RBthen
when15573WRBwhen
we15574PPwe
come15575VVPcome
before15576INbefore
this15577DTthis
Court15578NPCourt
to15579TOto
say15580VVsay
that15581IN/thatthat
they15582PPthey
are15583VBPbe
not15584RBnot
relevant15585JJrelevant
.15586SENT.
Still15587RBstill
,15588,,
as15589INas
I15590PPI
...15591:...
as15592INas
I15593PPI
was15594VBDbe
about15595RBabout
to15596TOto
mention15597VVmention
,15598,,
the15599DTthe
Insular15600JJinsular
Cases15601NNScase
comply15602VVcomply
with15603INwith
all15604DTall
of15605INof
the15606DTthe
factors15607NNSfactor
that15608IN/thatthat
this15609DTthis
...15610:...
that15611IN/thatthat
this15612DTthis
Court15613NNcourt
established15614VVNestablish
in15615INin
...15616:...
in15617INin
Janus15618NPJanus
,15619,,
especially15620RBespecially
the15621DTthe
quality15622NNquality
of15623INof
the15624DTthe
reasoning15625NNreasoning
,15626,,
because15627INbecause
it15628PPit
is15629VBZbe
based15630VVNbase
purely15631RBpurely
on15632INon
racial15633JJracial
considerations15634NNSconsideration
,15635,,
to15636TOto
say15637VVsay
that15638IN/thatthat
some15639DTsome
provisions15640NNSprovision
of15641INof
the15642DTthe
Constitution15643NPConstitution
do15644VVPdo
n't15645RBn't
apply15646VVapply
to15647TOto
the15648DTthe
unincorporated15649JJunincorporated
territories15650NNSterritory
because15651INbecause
they15652PPthey
are15653VBPbe
of15654INof
a15655DTa
different15656JJdifferent
race15657NNrace
.15658SENT.
That15659DTthat
's15660VBZbe
the15661DTthe
...15662:...
that15663WDTthat
's15664VBZbe
the15665DTthe
root15666NNroot
of15667INof
that15668DTthat
doctrine15669NNdoctrine
.15670SENT.
Now15671RBnow
,15672,,
here15673RBhere
...15674:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]15675LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I15676PPI
thought15677VVDthink
the15678DTthe
argument15679NNargument
was15680VBDbe
that15681IN/thatthat
the15682DTthe
Appointments15683NNSappointment
Clause15684NNclause
does15685VVZdo
apply15686VVapply
to15687TOto
Puerto15688NPPuerto
Rico15689NPRico
,15690,,
and15691CCand
the15692DTthe
question15693NNquestion
is15694VBZbe
simply15695RBsimply
whether15696INwhether
it15697PPit
's15698VBZbe
implicated15699VVNimplicate
on15700INon
these15701DTthese
particular15702JJparticular
facts15703NNSfact
with15704INwith
respect15705NNrespect
to15706TOto
this15707DTthis
particular15708JJparticular
agency15709NNagency
?15710SENT?
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15711LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Yes15712NPYes
,15713,,
Your15714PP$your
Honor15715NPHonor
.15716SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]15717LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
So15718INso
I15719PPI
...15720:...
I15721PPI
guess15722VVPguess
,15723,,
again15724RBagain
,15725,,
I15726PPI
just15727RBjust
do15728VVPdo
n't15729RBn't
see15730VVsee
the15731DTthe
pertinence15732NNpertinence
of15733INof
the15734DTthe
...15735:...
of15736INof
the15737DTthe
Insular15738JJinsular
Cases15739NNScase
.15740SENT.
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15741LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Well15742UHWell
,15743,,
as15744INas
I15745PPI
...15746:...
as15747INas
I15748PPI
mentioned15749VVDmention
,15750,,
and15751CCand
also15752RBalso
...15753:...
also15754RBalso
,15755,,
last15756JJlast
term15757NNterm
,15758,,
this15759DTthis
Court15760NPCourt
went15761VVDgo
ahead15762RBahead
and15763CCand
overruled15764VVDoverrule
the15765DTthe
Korematsu15766NPKorematsu
case15767NNcase
.15768SENT.
In15769INin
the15770DTthe
Trump15771NPTrump
versus15772CCversus
Hawaii15773NPHawaii
case15774NNcase
,15775,,
the15776DTthe
Court15777NPCourt
said15778VVDsay
that15779IN/thatthat
the15780DTthe
case15781NNcase
had15782VHDhave
nothing15783NNnothing
to15784TOto
do15785VVdo
with15786INwith
the15787DTthe
Trump15788NPTrump
versus15789CCversus
Hawaii15790NPHawaii
case15791NNcase
.15792SENT.
But15793CCbut
still15794RBstill
it15795PPit
was15796VBDbe
a15797DTa
morally15798RBmorally
repugnant15799JJrepugnant
doctrine15800NNdoctrine
that15801WDTthat
was15802VBDbe
purely15803RBpurely
on15804INon
the15805DTthe
basis15806NNbasis
...15807:...
considering15808VVGconsider
the15809DTthe
basis15810NNbasis
of15811INof
race15812NNrace
,15813,,
and15814CCand
,15815,,
therefore15816RBtherefore
,15817,,
it15818PPit
was15819VBDbe
overruled15820VVNoverrule
.15821SENT.
The15822DTthe
same15823JJsame
here15824RBhere
with15825INwith
the15826DTthe
Insular15827JJinsular
Cases15828NNScase
.15829SENT.
And15830CCand
I15831PPI
cannot15832MDcan
stress15833VVstress
enough15834RBenough
that15835IN/thatthat
the15836DTthe
parties15837NNSparty
have15838VHPhave
relied15839VVNrely
on15840INon
the15841DTthe
Insular15842JJinsular
Cases15843NNScase
in15844INin
this15845DTthis
...15846:...
in15847INin
this15848DTthis
case15849NNcase
.15850SENT.
That15851DTthat
is15852VBZbe
why15853WRBwhy
it15854PPit
's15855VBZbe
the15856DTthe
...15857:...
the15858DTthe
perfect15859JJperfect
opportunity15860NNopportunity
to15861TOto
address15862VVaddress
them15863PPthem
.15864SENT.
Now15865RBnow
...15866:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15867LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Can15868MDcan
I15869PPI
ask15870VVask
you15871PPyou
a15872DTa
question15873NNquestion
about15874INabout
the15875DTthe
duties15876NNSduty
of15877INof
the15878DTthe
Board15879NPBoard
?15880SENT?
If15881INif
the15882DTthe
duties15883NNSduty
of15884INof
the15885DTthe
Board15886NPBoard
and15887CCand
responsibilities15888NNSresponsibility
are15889VBPbe
considered15890VVNconsider
primarily15891RBprimarily
local15892JJlocal
...15893:...
I15894PPI
'll15895MDwill
ask15896VVask
the15897DTthe
same15898JJsame
question15899NNquestion
I15900PPI
asked15901VVDask
Mr15902NPMr
.15903SENT.
Olson15904NPOlson
...15905:...
do15906VVPdo
you15907PPyou
lose15908VVPlose
or15909CCor
do15910VVPdo
you15911PPyou
have15912VHPhave
an15913DTan
alternative15914JJalternative
argument15915NNargument
?15916SENT?
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15917LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Your15918PP$your
Honor15919NPHonor
,15920,,
I15921PPI
...15922:...
I15923PPI
do15924VVPdo
n't15925RBn't
think15926VVthink
that15927WDTthat
we15928PPwe
...15929:...
that15930IN/thatthat
the15931DTthe
...15932:...
the15933DTthe
...15934:...
the15935DTthe
authority15936NNauthority
of15937INof
the15938DTthe
Board15939NPBoard
can15940MDcan
...15941:...
can15942MDcan
...15943:...
can15944MDcan
be15945VBbe
considered15946VVNconsider
purely15947RBpurely
local15948JJlocal
.15949SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15950LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I15951PPI
understand15952VVPunderstand
that15953RBthat
.15954SENT.
But15955CCbut
,15956,,
if15957INif
...15958:...
if15959INif
we15960PPwe
conclude15961VVPconclude
otherwise15962RBotherwise
,15963,,
is15964VBZbe
there15965RBthere
an15966DTan
alternative15967JJalternative
argument15968NNargument
,15969,,
or15970CCor
is15971VBZbe
that15972IN/thatthat
the15973DTthe
end15974NNend
of15975INof
the15976DTthe
case15977NNcase
?15978SENT?
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15979LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Well15980UHWell
,15981,,
I15982PPI
...15983:...
I15984PPI
believe15985VVPbelieve
that15986IN/thatthat
there15987EXthere
is15988VBZbe
the15989DTthe
example15990NNexample
of15991INof
...15992:...
of15993INof
D15994NPD
.15995SENT.
C15996LSc
.15997SENT.
judges15998NNSjudge
who15999WPwho
were16000VBDbe
still16001RBstill
considered16002VVNconsider
to16003TOto
be16004VBbe
officers16005NNSofficer
of16006INof
the16007DTthe
United16008NPUnited
States16009NPSStates
in16010INin
the16011DTthe
...16012:...
in16013INin
the16014DTthe
Weiss16015NPWeiss
case16016NNcase
.16017SENT.
So16018RBso
there16019EXthere
is16020VBZbe
...16021:...
there16022EXthere
are16023VBPbe
a16024DTa
couple16025JJcouple
other16026JJother
examples16027NNSexample
that16028IN/thatthat
this16029DTthis
Court16030NNcourt
could16031MDcould
...16032:...
could16033MDcould
take16034VVtake
.16035SENT.
Now16036RBnow
I16037PPI
would16038MDwould
like16039VVlike
...16040:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]16041LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Which16042WDTwhich
D16043NPD
.16044SENT.
C16045SYMc
...16046:...
.16047SENT.
which16048WDTwhich
D16049NND
.16050SENT.
C16051LSc
.16052SENT.
judges16053NNSjudge
are16054VBPbe
you16055PPyou
talking16056VVGtalk
about16057RBabout
?16058SENT?
I16059PPI
thought16060VVDthink
the16061DTthe
judges16062NNSjudge
of16063INof
the16064DTthe
D16065NPD
.16066SENT.
C16067LSc
.16068SENT.
Superior16069NPSuperior
Court16070NPCourt
and16071CCand
of16072INof
the16073DTthe
D16074NPD
.16075SENT.
C16076LSc
.16077SENT.
Court16078NPCourt
of16079INof
Appeals16080NPSAppeals
are16081VBPbe
not16082RBnot
...16083:...
are16084VBPbe
not16085RBnot
federal16086JJfederal
judges16087NNSjudge
.16088SENT.
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]16089LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Well16090UHWell
,16091,,
Your16092PP$your
Honor16093NPHonor
,16094,,
I'm16095NPI'm
...16096:...
I16097PPI
'm16098VBPbe
talking16099VVGtalk
about16100INabout
the16101DTthe
...16102:...
the16103DTthe
Weiss16104NPWeiss
case16105NNcase
.16106SENT.
And16107CCand
...16108:...
but16109CCbut
still16110RBstill
the16111DTthe
...16112:...
the16113DTthe
...16114:...
the16115DTthe
...16116:...
the16117DTthe
issue16118NNissue
of16119INof
...16120:...
of16121INof
the16122DTthe
purely16123RBpurely
local16124JJlocal
affairs16125NNSaffair
of16126INof
...16127:...
of16128INof
...16129:...
of16130INof
the16131DTthe
oversight16132NNoversight
board16133NNboard
cannot16134MDcan
stand16135VVstand
if16136INif
we16137PPwe
look16138VVPlook
at16139INat
the16140DTthe
...16141:...
the16142DTthe
authority16143NNauthority
that16144IN/thatthat
it16145PPit
was16146VBDbe
vested16147VVNvest
on16148INon
these16149DTthese
officers16150NNSofficer
through16151INthrough
PROMESA16152NPPROMESA
.16153SENT.
Now16154RBnow
I16155PPI
would16156MDwould
like16157VVlike
to16158TOto
address16159VVaddress
the16160DTthe
remedy16161NNremedy
because16162INbecause
I16163PPI
think16164VVPthink
that16165IN/thatthat
it16166PPit
is16167VBZbe
very16168RBvery
important16169JJimportant
for16170INfor
...16171:...
for16172INfor
us16173PPus
to16174TOto
address16175VVaddress
that16176DTthat
.16177SENT.
My16178PP$my
friends16179NNSfriend
on16180INon
the16181DTthe
other16182JJother
side16183NNside
have16184VHPhave
mentioned16185VVNmention
the16186DTthe
consequences16187NNSconsequence
of16188INof
...16189:...
of16190INof
this16191DTthis
...16192:...
of16193INof
this16194DTthis
case16195NNcase
in16196INin
terms16197NNSterm
of16198INof
millions16199NNSmillion
of16200INof
dollars16201NNSdollar
.16202SENT.
But16203CCbut
they16204PPthey
have16205VHPhave
forgot16206VVNforget
about16207INabout
the16208DTthe
impact16209NNimpact
to16210TOto
the16211DTthe
people16212NNSpeople
.16213SENT.
What16214WPWhat
the16215DTthe
...16216:...
what16217WPwhat
the16218DTthe
opposing16219JJopposing
parties16220NNSparty
are16221VBPbe
asking16222VVGask
this16223DTthis
Court16224NPCourt
to16225TOto
validate16226VVvalidate
through16227INthrough
the16228DTthe
de16229FWde
facto16230FWfacto
officer16231NNofficer
doctrine16232NNdoctrine
is16233VBZbe
a16234DTa
certification16235NNcertification
of16236INof
the16237DTthe
fiscal16238JJfiscal
plan16239NNplan
,16240,,
which16241WDTwhich
is16242VBZbe
not16243RBnot
subject16244JJsubject
to16245TOto
judicial16246JJjudicial
review16247NNreview
,16248,,
that16249WDTthat
imposes16250VVZimpose
austerity16251NNausterity
measures16252NNSmeasure
on16253INon
the16254DTthe
people16255NNSpeople
that16256WDTthat
has16257VHZhave
impaired16258VVNimpair
contractual16259JJcontractual
obligations16260NNSobligation
,16261,,
including16262VVGinclude
the16263DTthe
collective16264JJcollective
bargaining16265NNbargaining
agreement16266NNagreement
of16267INof
my16268PP$my
clients16269NNSclient
,16270,,
stripping16271VVGstrip
them16272PPthem
of16273INof
...16274:...
of16275INof
workers16276NNSworker
'16277POS'
rights16278NNSright
like16279INlike
salaries16280NNSsalary
,16281,,
overpaying16282VVGoverpay
...16283:...
overpayment16284NNoverpayment
,16285,,
and16286CCand
...16287:...
and16288CCand
medical16289JJmedical
...16290:...
medical16291JJmedical
benefits16292NNSbenefit
.16293SENT.
But16294CCbut
also16295RBalso
we16296PPwe
are16297VBPbe
talking16298VVGtalk
about16299INabout
agreements16300NNSagreement
with16301INwith
bondholders16302NNSbondholder
,16303,,
with16304INwith
Dapapa16305NPDapapa
,16306,,
which16307WDTwhich
is16308VBZbe
the16309DTthe
UTIER16310NPUTIER
's16311POS's
employers16312NNSemployer
,16313,,
that16314WDTthat
provides16315VVZprovide
for16316INfor
the16317DTthe
payment16318NNpayment
of16319INof
the16320DTthe
bond16321NNbond
...16322:...
of16323INof
the16324DTthe
bonds16325NNSbond
ahead16326RBahead
of16327INof
the16328DTthe
salaries16329NNSsalary
,16330,,
ahead16331RBahead
of16332INof
the16333DTthe
...16334:...
of16335INof
the16336DTthe
contributions16337NNScontribution
to16338TOto
the16339DTthe
retirement16340NNretirement
system16341NNsystem
,16342,,
and16343CCand
that16344IN/thatthat
it16345PPit
threatens16346VVZthreaten
the16347DTthe
mere16348JJmere
...16349:...
the16350DTthe
mere16351JJmere
feasibility16352NNfeasibility
of16353INof
such16354PDTsuch
an16355DTan
instrumentality16356NNinstrumentality
.16357SENT.
We16358PPwe
are16359VBPbe
talking16360VVGtalk
about16361RBabout
7,00016362CD@card@
labor16363NNlabor
claims16364NNSclaim
that16365WDTthat
were16366VBDbe
stayed16367VVNstay
because16368INbecause
of16369INof
the16370DTthe
Title16371NPTitle
III16372NPIII
proceedings16373NNSproceeding
,16374,,
proceedings16375NNSproceeding
that16376WDTthat
were16377VBDbe
filed16378VVNfile
at16379INat
the16380DTthe
sole16381JJsole
discretion16382NNdiscretion
of16383INof
the16384DTthe
oversight16385NNoversight
board16386NNboard
,16387,,
and16388CCand
that16389WDTthat
were16390VBDbe
...16391:...
that16392WDTthat
were16393VBDbe
left16394VVNleave
without16395INwithout
a16396DTa
remedy16397NNremedy
.16398SENT.
So16399RBso
...16400:...
and16401CCand
...16402:...
and16403CCand
...16404:...
and16405CCand
like16406INlike
I16407PPI
mentioned16408VVDmention
,16409,,
the16410DTthe
...16411:...
the16412DTthe
budgets16413NNSbudget
that16414WDTthat
establish16415VVestablish
the16416DTthe
policy16417NNpolicy
for16418INfor
the16419DTthe
government16420NNgovernment
of16421INof
Puerto16422NPPuerto
Rico16423NPRico
,16424,,
that16425WDTthat
it16426PPit
is16427VBZbe
done16428VVNdo
at16429INat
the16430DTthe
sole16431JJsole
discretion16432NNdiscretion
of16433INof
the16434DTthe
oversight16435NNoversight
board16436NNboard
because16437INbecause
we16438PPwe
cannot16439MDcan
say16440VVsay
that16441IN/thatthat
the16442DTthe
government16443NNgovernment
of16444INof
Puerto16445NPPuerto
Rico16446NPRico
has16447VHZhave
participation16448NNparticipation
.16449SENT.
The16450DTthe
...16451:...
if16452INif
...16453:...
if16454INif
the16455DTthe
Board16456NPBoard
...16457:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16458LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
You16459PPyou
can16460MDcan
finish16461VVfinish
your16462PP$your
sentence16463NNsentence
.16464SENT.
[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]16465LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]
Yes16466NPYes
,16467,,
thank16468VVPthank
you16469PPyou
.16470SENT.
If16471INif
the16472DTthe
Board16473NPBoard
understands16474VVZunderstand
that16475IN/thatthat
the16476DTthe
...16477:...
that16478IN/thatthat
the16479DTthe
fiscal16480JJfiscal
plan16481NNplan
,16482,,
which16483WDTwhich
is16484VBZbe
the16485DTthe
blueprint16486NNblueprint
for16487INfor
all16488DTall
of16489INof
these16490DTthese
proceedings16491NNSproceeding
,16492,,
or16493CCor
the16494DTthe
budgets16495NNSbudget
,16496,,
are16497VBPbe
inconsistent16498JJinconsistent
with16499INwith
PROMESA16500NPPROMESA
,16501,,
the16502DTthe
Board16503NPBoard
can16504MDcan
substitute16505VVsubstitute
for16506INfor
its16507PP$its
own16508JJown
at16509INat
its16510PP$its
sole16511JJsole
discretion16512NNdiscretion
.16513SENT.
Thank16514VVthank
you16515PPyou
.16516SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16517LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank16518VVthank
you16519PPyou
,16520,,
counsel16521NNcounsel
.16522SENT.
216523CD2
Three16524CDThree
minutes16525NNSminute
,16526,,
Mr16527NPMr
.16528SENT.
Verrilli16529NPVerrilli
.16530SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]16531LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Thank16532VVthank
you16533PPyou
,16534,,
Mr16535NPMr
.16536SENT.
Chief16537NPChief
Justice16538NPJustice
.16539SENT.
I16540PPI
want16541VVPwant
to16542TOto
make16543VVmake
one16544CDone
overarching16545JJoverarching
point16546NNpoint
on16547INon
the16548DTthe
merits16549NNSmerit
and16550CCand
one16551CDone
point16552NNpoint
on16553INon
remedy16554NNremedy
.16555SENT.
On16556INon
the16557DTthe
merits16558NNSmerit
,16559,,
I16560PPI
want16561VVPwant
to16562TOto
go16563VVgo
at16564INat
the16565DTthe
sum16566NNsum
of16567INof
each16568DTeach
question16569NNquestion
.16570SENT.
I16571PPI
think16572VVPthink
,16573,,
if16574INif
you16575PPyou
think16576VVPthink
the16577DTthe
sum16578NNsum
of16579INof
each16580DTeach
,16581,,
I16582PPI
do16583VVPdo
n't16584RBn't
think16585VVthink
you16586PPyou
can16587MDcan
resolve16588VVresolve
it16589PPit
based16590VVNbase
on16591INon
effects16592NNSeffect
.16593SENT.
I16594PPI
mean16595VVPmean
,16596,,
if16597INif
you16598PPyou
think16599VVPthink
about16600INabout
it16601PPit
,16602,,
the16603DTthe
effects16604NNSeffect
we16605PPwe
're16606VBPbe
talking16607VVGtalk
about16608RBabout
here16609RBhere
are16610VBPbe
not16611RBnot
the16612DTthe
Board16613NPBoard
's16614POS's
actions16615NNSaction
.16616SENT.
It16617PPit
was16618VBDbe
the16619DTthe
issuance16620NNissuance
of16621INof
the16622DTthe
bonds16623NNSbond
and16624CCand
then16625RBthen
the16626DTthe
default16627NNdefault
by16628INby
the16629DTthe
government16630NNgovernment
of16631INof
Puerto16632NPPuerto
Rico16633NPRico
,16634,,
the16635DTthe
elected16636VVNelect
representatives16637NNSrepresentative
of16638INof
Puerto16639NPPuerto
Rico16640NPRico
.16641SENT.
So16642RBso
,16643,,
if16644INif
its16645PP$its
effect16646NNeffect
is16647VBZbe
then16648RBthen
they16649PPthey
're16650VBPbe
officers16651NNSofficer
of16652INof
the16653DTthe
United16654NPUnited
States16655NPSStates
,16656,,
that16657WDTthat
can16658MDcan
't16659RB't
be16660VBbe
right16661JJright
and16662CCand
it16663PPit
's16664VBZbe
just16665RBjust
not16666RBnot
an16667DTan
administrable16668JJadministrable
test16669NNtest
.16670SENT.
It16671PPit
can16672MDcan
't16673RB't
be16674VBbe
whether16675INwhether
they16676PPthey
are16677VBPbe
enforcing16678VVGenforce
federal16679JJfederal
law16680NNlaw
.16681SENT.
Mr16682NPMr
.16683SENT.
Olson16684NPOlson
raised16685VVDraise
the16686DTthe
Limtiaco16687NPLimtiaco
case16688NNcase
.16689SENT.
That16690DTthat
case16691NNcase
proves16692VVZprove
our16693PP$our
point16694NNpoint
.16695SENT.
The16696DTthe
statute16697NNstatute
he16698PPhe
's16699VBZbe
talking16700VVGtalk
about16701RBabout
in16702INin
that16703DTthat
case16704NNcase
requiring16705VVGrequire
fiscal16706JJfiscal
solvency16707NNsolvency
was16708VBDbe
enforced16709VVNenforce
by16710INby
the16711DTthe
governor16712NNgovernor
and16713CCand
the16714DTthe
legislature16715NNlegislature
,16716,,
who16717WPwho
are16718VBPbe
not16719RBnot
appointed16720VVNappoint
in16721INin
conformity16722NNconformity
with16723INwith
the16724DTthe
Appointments16725NNSappointment
Clause16726NNclause
but16727CCbut
elected16728VVNelect
.16729SENT.
So16730RBso
,16731,,
if16732INif
he16733PPhe
's16734VBZbe
right16735RBright
about16736RBabout
that16737IN/thatthat
,16738,,
Guam16739NPGuam
's16740POS's
government16741NNgovernment
is16742VBZbe
unconstitutional16743JJunconstitutional
.16744SENT.
And16745CCand
it16746PPit
also16747RBalso
would16748MDwould
mean16749VVmean
that16750IN/thatthat
the16751DTthe
D16752NPD
.16753SENT.
C16754LSc
.16755SENT.
government16756NNgovernment
,16757,,
from16758INfrom
the16759DTthe
...16760:...
from16761INfrom
the16762DTthe
beginning16763NNbeginning
until16764INuntil
home16765NNhome
rule16766NNrule
,16767,,
was16768VBDbe
unconstitutional16769JJunconstitutional
because16770INbecause
they16771PPthey
were16772VBDbe
enforcing16773VVGenforce
federal16774JJfederal
statutes16775NNSstatute
.16776SENT.
So16777INso
that16778DTthat
can16779MDcan
't16780RB't
be16781VBbe
right16782JJright
.16783SENT.
It16784PPit
can16785MDcan
't16786RB't
be16787VBbe
based16788VVNbase
on16789INon
the16790DTthe
source16791NNsource
of16792INof
authority16793NNauthority
.16794SENT.
They16795PPthey
're16796VBPbe
really16797RBreally
not16798RBnot
arguing16799VVGargue
that16800IN/thatthat
anymore16801RBanymore
.16802SENT.
And16803CCand
even16804RBeven
if16805INif
you16806PPyou
wanted16807VVDwant
to16808TOto
accept16809VVaccept
the16810DTthe
intermediate16811JJintermediate
authority16812NNauthority
point16813NNpoint
,16814,,
you16815PPyou
...16816:...
and16817CCand
try16818VVPtry
to16819TOto
carve16820VVcarve
out16821RPout
Puerto16822NPPuerto
Rico16823NPRico
that16824DTthat
way16825NNway
,16826,,
you16827PPyou
can16828MDcan
't16829RB't
save16830INsave
Guam16831NPGuam
,16832,,
you16833PPyou
can16834MDcan
't16835RB't
save16836INsave
the16837DTthe
Virgin16838NPVirgin
Islands16839NPSIslands
,16840,,
you16841PPyou
can16842MDcan
't16843RB't
save16844INsave
home16845NNhome
rule16846NNrule
in16847INin
D16848NPD
.16849SENT.
C16850LSc
.16851SENT.
You16852PPyou
basically16853RBbasically
blow16854VVblow
everything16855NNeverything
else16856RBelse
up16857RBup
if16858INif
you16859PPyou
adopt16860VVPadopt
that16861DTthat
standard16862NNstandard
,16863,,
which16864WDTwhich
is16865VBZbe
why16866WRBwhy
they16867PPthey
do16868VVPdo
n't16869RBn't
really16870RBreally
advocate16871VVadvocate
for16872INfor
it16873PPit
.16874SENT.
So16875RBso
really16876RBreally
it16877PPit
needs16878VVZneed
to16879TOto
be16880VBbe
our16881PP$our
test16882NNtest
.16883SENT.
Our16884PP$our
test16885NNtest
is16886VBZbe
one16887CDone
that16888WDTthat
's16889VBZbe
faithful16890JJfaithful
to16891TOto
the16892DTthe
text16893NNtext
,16894,,
it16895PPit
's16896VBZbe
faithful16897JJfaithful
to16898TOto
the16899DTthe
history16900NNhistory
,16901,,
it16902PPit
rests16903VVZrest
on16904INon
principle16905NNprinciple
,16906,,
it16907PPit
avoids16908VVZavoid
threats16909NNSthreat
to16910TOto
home16911NNhome
rule16912NNrule
,16913,,
and16914CCand
it16915PPit
's16916VBZbe
administrable16917JJadministrable
.16918SENT.
Maybe16919RBmaybe
there16920EXthere
are16921VBPbe
going16922VVGgo
to16923TOto
be16924VBbe
hard16925JJhard
questions16926NNSquestion
on16927INon
the16928DTthe
margin16929NNmargin
and16930CCand
we16931PPwe
discussed16932VVDdiscuss
those16933DTthose
today16934NNtoday
.16935SENT.
This16936DTthis
is16937VBZbe
not16938RBnot
a16939DTa
hard16940JJhard
case16941NNcase
.16942SENT.
This16943DTthis
is16944VBZbe
exclusively16945RBexclusively
territorial16946JJterritorial
authority16947NNauthority
.16948SENT.
Now16949RBnow
,16950,,
on16951INon
remedy16952NNremedy
,16953,,
I16954PPI
think16955VVPthink
Mr16956NPMr
.16957SENT.
Olson16958NPOlson
's16959POS's
answer16960NNanswer
to16961TOto
Justice16962NPJustice
Alito16963NPAlito
's16964POS's
question16965NNquestion
tells16966VVZtell
you16967PPyou
all16968RBall
you16969PPyou
need16970VVPneed
to16971TOto
know16972VVknow
about16973RBabout
what16974WPwhat
's16975VBZbe
going16976VVGgo
to16977TOto
happen16978VVhappen
next16979JJnext
.16980SENT.
They16981PPthey
brought16982VVDbring
this16983DTthis
suit16984NNsuit
because16985INbecause
they16986PPthey
want16987VVPwant
a16988DTa
different16989JJdifferent
Board16990NPBoard
.16991SENT.
They16992PPthey
're16993VBPbe
perfectly16994RBperfectly
entitled16995VVNentitle
to16996TOto
do16997VVdo
that16998DTthat
.16999SENT.
They17000PPthey
've17001VHPhave
every17002DTevery
right17003NNright
to17004TOto
do17005VVdo
that17006DTthat
.17007SENT.
But17008CCbut
that17009DTthat
's17010VBZbe
what17011WPwhat
they17012PPthey
want17013VVPwant
because17014INbecause
they17015PPthey
do17016VVPdo
n't17017RBn't
like17018VVlike
the17019DTthe
way17020NNway
this17021DTthis
Board17022NPBoard
is17023VBZbe
working17024VVGwork
out17025RPout
the17026DTthe
debt17027NNdebt
problems17028NNSproblem
.17029SENT.
And17030CCand
so17031INso
what17032WPwhat
you17033PPyou
can17034MDcan
be17035VBbe
sure17036JJsure
of17037INof
,17038,,
if17039INif
we17040PPwe
're17041VBPbe
in17042INin
the17043DTthe
remedies17044NNSremedy
phase17045NNphase
and17046CCand
I17047PPI
hope17048VVPhope
that17049IN/thatthat
we17050PPwe
are17051VBPbe
not17052RBnot
,17053,,
but17054CCbut
what17055WPwhat
you17056PPyou
can17057MDcan
be17058VBbe
sure17059JJsure
of17060INof
if17061INif
we17062PPwe
are17063VBPbe
is17064VBZbe
that17065IN/thatthat
they17066PPthey
are17067VBPbe
going17068VVGgo
to17069TOto
fight17070VVfight
ratification17071NNratification
by17072INby
the17073DTthe
Board17074NPBoard
tooth17075NNtooth
and17076CCand
nail17077NNnail
for17078INfor
years17079NNSyear
and17080CCand
years17081NNSyear
and17082CCand
do17083VVPdo
everything17084NNeverything
possible17085JJpossible
to17086TOto
keep17087VVkeep
this17088DTthis
thing17089NNthing
in17090INin
a17091DTa
situation17092NNsituation
in17093INin
which17094WDTwhich
they17095PPthey
...17096:...
they17097PPthey
...17098:...
they17099PPthey
have17100VHPhave
the17101DTthe
hope17102NNhope
to17103TOto
get17104VVget
a17105DTa
different17106JJdifferent
Board17107NPBoard
that17108WDTthat
will17109MDwill
accomplish17110VVaccomplish
their17111PP$their
objectives17112NNSobjective
.17113SENT.
So17114RBso
that17115DTthat
's17116VBZbe
what17117WPwhat
will17118MDwill
happen17119VVhappen
if17120INif
we17121PPwe
go17122VVPgo
down17123RPdown
that17124DTthat
path17125NNpath
.17126SENT.
And17127CCand
I17128PPI
would17129MDwould
strongly17130RBstrongly
urge17131VVurge
the17132DTthe
Court17133NPCourt
not17134RBnot
to17135TOto
do17136VVdo
that17137DTthat
.17138SENT.
If17139INif
you17140PPyou
do17141VVPdo
reach17142VVreach
the17143DTthe
remedial17144JJremedial
issue17145NNissue
,17146,,
then17147RBthen
I17148PPI
think17149VVPthink
the17150DTthe
de17151FWde
facto17152FWfacto
officer17153NNofficer
doctrine17154NNdoctrine
,17155,,
a17156DTa
perfectly17157RBperfectly
reasonable17158JJreasonable
judgment17159NNjudgment
,17160,,
but17161CCbut
more17162RBRmore
fundamentally17163RBfundamentally
,17164,,
there17165EXthere
is17166VBZbe
no17167DTno
reason17168NNreason
to17169TOto
reach17170VVreach
the17171DTthe
remedial17172JJremedial
issue17173NNissue
...17174:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]17175LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Mr17176NPMr
...17177:...
.17178SENT.
Mr17179NPMr
.17180SENT.
Verrilli17181NPVerrilli
...17182:...
[MR. VERRILLI]17183LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...17184:...
to17185TOto
support17186VVsupport
as17187RBas
...17188:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]17189LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...17190:...
let17191VVlet
...17192:...
[MR. VERRILLI]17193LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
...17194:...
constitutional17195JJconstitutional
...17196:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]17197LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...17198:...
let17199VVlet
's17200VBZbe
say17201VVsay
it17202PPit
is17203VBZbe
your17204PP$your
test17205NNtest
.17206SENT.
But17207CCbut
let17208NNlet
's17209POS's
also17210RBalso
say17211VVPsay
that17212IN/thatthat
the17213DTthe
crux17214NNcrux
of17215INof
this17216DTthis
statute17217NNstatute
...17218:...
there17219EXthere
are17220VBPbe
some17221DTsome
other17222JJother
things17223NNSthing
in17224INin
it17225PPit
,17226,,
but17227CCbut
the17228DTthe
crux17229NNcrux
of17230INof
the17231DTthe
statute17232NNstatute
is17233VBZbe
that17234IN/thatthat
it17235PPit
sets17236VVZset
up17237RPup
a17238DTa
scheme17239NNscheme
for17240INfor
restructuring17241VVGrestructure
the17242DTthe
debt17243NNdebt
of17244INof
a17245DTa
bankrupt17246JJbankrupt
territory17247NNterritory
and17248CCand
...17249:...
on17250INon
...17251:...
with17252INwith
the17253DTthe
backdrop17254NNbackdrop
that17255IN/thatthat
that17256WDTthat
could17257MDcould
not17258RBnot
have17259VHhave
been17260VBNbe
done17261VVNdo
under17262INunder
pre-PROMESA17263NPpre-PROMESA
federal17264JJfederal
law17265NNlaw
by17266INby
local17267JJlocal
officials17268NNSofficial
themselves17269PPthemselves
.17270SENT.
Why17271WRBwhy
is17272VBZbe
it17273PPit
primarily17274RBprimarily
local17275JJlocal
?17276SENT?
[MR. VERRILLI]17277LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
May17278MDmay
I17279PPI
answer17280VVanswer
,17281,,
Mr17282NPMr
.17283SENT.
Chief17284NPChief
Justice17285NPJustice
?17286SENT?
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]17287LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Yes17288NPYes
.17289SENT.
[MR. VERRILLI]17290LOC[MR. VERRILLI]
Two17291CDTwo
things17292NNSthing
.17293SENT.
First17294RBfirst
,17295,,
you17296PPyou
would17297MDwould
n't17298RBn't
think17299VVthink
that17300IN/thatthat
the17301DTthe
mayor17302NNmayor
of17303INof
Detroit17304NPDetroit
was17305VBDbe
converted17306VVNconvert
into17307INinto
a17308DTa
federal17309JJfederal
official17310NNofficial
because17311INbecause
he17312PPhe
took17313VVDtake
Detroit17314NPDetroit
into17315INinto
bankruptcy17316NNbankruptcy
under17317INunder
Chapter17318NPChapter
917319CD9
.17320SENT.
He17321PPhe
's17322VBZbe
still17323RBstill
exercising17324VVGexercise
his17325PP$his
local17326JJlocal
power17327NNpower
.17328SENT.
Same17329JJsame
with17330INwith
the17331DTthe
Board17332NPBoard
.17333SENT.
And17334CCand
,17335,,
second17336RBsecond
,17337,,
again17338RBagain
,17339,,
the17340DTthe
question17341NNquestion
I17342PPI
think17343VVPthink
has17344VHZhave
to17345TOto
be17346VBbe
whose17347WP$whose
interests17348NNSinterest
is17349VBZbe
...17350:...
is17351VBZbe
the17352DTthe
Board17353NPBoard
advancing17354VVGadvance
in17355INin
that17356DTthat
process17357NNprocess
?17358SENT?
It17359PPit
's17360VBZbe
the17361DTthe
court17362NNcourt
,17363,,
the17364DTthe
Article17365NPArticle
III17366NPIII
court17367NNcourt
,17368,,
that17369WDTthat
engages17370VVZengage
in17371INin
the17372DTthe
broad17373JJbroad
adjustment17374NNadjustment
of17375INof
interests17376NNSinterest
here17377RBhere
to17378TOto
achieve17379VVachieve
a17380DTa
...17381:...
a17382DTa
nationwide17383JJnationwide
result17384NNresult
.17385SENT.
The17386DTthe
Board17387NPBoard
's17388POS's
job17389NNjob
,17390,,
as17391INas
the17392DTthe
statute17393NNstatute
expressly17394RBexpressly
says17395VVZsay
,17396,,
is17397VBZbe
to17398TOto
act17399VVact
on17400INon
behalf17401NNbehalf
of17402INof
the17403DTthe
people17404NNSpeople
of17405INof
Puerto17406NPPuerto
Rico17407NPRico
and17408CCand
the17409DTthe
government17410NNgovernment
of17411INof
Puerto17412NPPuerto
Rico17413NPRico
as17414INas
its17415PP$its
representative17416NNrepresentative
.17417SENT.
It17418PPit
's17419VBZbe
an17420DTan
advocate17421NNadvocate
for17422INfor
Puerto17423NPPuerto
Rico17424NPRico
,17425,,
and17426CCand
that17427DTthat
's17428VBZbe
why17429WRBwhy
it17430PPit
's17431POS's
territorial17432JJterritorial
authority17433NNauthority
.17434SENT.
Thank17435VVthank
you17436PPyou
.17437SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]17438LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank17439VVthank
you17440PPyou
,17441,,
counsel17442NNcounsel
.17443SENT.
The17444DTthe
case17445NNcase
is17446VBZbe
submitted17447VVNsubmit
.17448SENT.