<s> /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/ptreetagger/Financial.xml-src.tt /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/treetagger/Financial.xml-out.tt pos tagset built from model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par en lemma of the model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par - [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We2PPwe 'll3MDwill hear4VVhear argument5NNargument today6NNtoday in7INin Case8NPCase 18-13349CD@card@ ,10,, the11DTthe Financial12NPFinancial Oversight13NPOversight and14CCand Management15NPManagement Board16NPBoard for17INfor Puerto18NPPuerto Rico19NPRico versus20CCversus Aurelius21NPAurelius Investment22NPInvestment ,23,, and24CCand the25DTthe consolidated26JJconsolidated cases27NNScase .28SENT. Mr29NPMr .30SENT. Verrilli31NPVerrilli .32SENT.

[MR. VERRILLI]33LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Mr34NPMr .35SENT. Chief36NPChief Justice37NPJustice ,38,, and39CCand may40MDmay it41PPit please42VVplease the43DTthe Court44NPCourt :45:: The46DTthe question47NNquestion in48INin this49DTthis case50NNcase is51VBZbe whether52INwhether members53NNSmember of54INof the55DTthe Financial56NPFinancial Oversight57NPOversight Board58NPBoard are59VBPbe officers60NNSofficer of61INof the62DTthe United63NPUnited States64NPSStates who65WPwho must66MDmust be67VBbe selected68VVNselect in69INin the70DTthe manner71NNmanner that72IN/thatthat the73DTthe Appointments74NNSappointment Clause75NNclause prescribes76VVZprescribe or77CCor whether78INwhether they79PPthey are80VBPbe instead81RBinstead territorial82JJterritorial officers83NNSofficer who84WPwho do85VVPdo not86RBnot have87VHhave to88TOto be89VBbe selected90VVNselect in91INin that92DTthat manner93NNmanner .94SENT. The95DTthe Constitution96NPConstitution 's97POS's text98NNtext ,99,, structure100NNstructure ,101,, and102CCand history103NNhistory ,104,, and105CCand this106DTthis Court107NPCourt 's108POS's precedents109NNSprecedent all110RBall make111VVPmake clear112JJclear that113IN/thatthat the114DTthe proper115JJproper focus116NNfocus in117INin answering118VVGanswer that119DTthat question120NNquestion is121VBZbe the122DTthe nature123NNnature of124INof the125DTthe authority126NNauthority the127DTthe Board128NPBoard exercises129VVZexercise .130SENT. It131PPit comes132VVZcome down133RPdown to134TOto whether135INwhether Congress136NPCongress has137VHZhave vested138VVNvest the139DTthe Board140NPBoard with141INwith the142DTthe executive143JJexecutive power144NNpower of145INof the146DTthe national147JJnational government148NNgovernment or149CCor ,150,, instead151RBinstead ,152,, vested153VVDvest the154DTthe Board155NPBoard with156INwith the157DTthe territorial158JJterritorial executive159JJexecutive power160NNpower .161SENT. The162DTthe statute163NNstatute that164WDTthat created165VVDcreate the166DTthe Board167NPBoard ,168,, PROMESA169NPPROMESA ,170,, answers171VVZanswer that172IN/thatthat question173NNquestion in174INin a175DTa straightforward176JJstraightforward way177NNway .178SENT. It179PPit ...180:... it181PPit sets182VVZset up183RPup an184DTan entity185NNentity within186INwithin the187DTthe territorial188JJterritorial government189NNgovernment .190SENT. It191PPit gives192VVZgive the193DTthe Board194NPBoard only195JJonly territory-specific196JJterritory-specific authority197NNauthority and198CCand instructs199VVZinstruct the200DTthe Board201NPBoard to202TOto pursue203VVpursue only204RBonly territory-specific205JJterritory-specific objectives206NNSobjective .207SENT. The208DTthe Board209NPBoard acts210NNSact on211INon behalf212NNbehalf of213INof Puerto214NPPuerto Rico215NPRico as216INas its217PP$its representative218NNrepresentative in219INin judicial220JJjudicial proceedings221NNSproceeding to222TOto restructure223VVrestructure the224DTthe territory225NNterritory 's226POS's debts227NNSdebt .228SENT. It229PPit pursues230VVZpursue only231RBonly Puerto232NPPuerto Rico233NPRico 's234POS's interests235NNSinterest in236INin those237DTthose proceedings238NNSproceeding .239SENT. It240PPit 's241VBZbe up242RBup to243TOto the244DTthe Article245NPArticle III246NPIII court247NNcourt that248WDTthat adjudicates249VVZadjudicate those250DTthose proceedings251NNSproceeding to252TOto balance253VVbalance all254PDTall the255DTthe competing256VVGcompete interests257NNSinterest .258SENT. Congress259NPCongress also260RBalso instructed261VVDinstruct the262DTthe Board263NPBoard to264TOto implement265VVimplement a266DTa method267NNmethod for268INfor restoring269VVGrestore fiscal270JJfiscal stability271NNstability .272SENT. That273IN/thatthat ,274,, too275RBtoo ,276,, is277VBZbe territorial278JJterritorial authority279NNauthority .280SENT. It281PPit reaches282VVZreach only283RBonly Puerto284NPPuerto Rico285NPRico 's286POS's budgeting287NNbudgeting and288CCand fiscal289JJfiscal planning290NNplanning ,291,, and292CCand the293DTthe Board294NPBoard must295MDmust exercise296VVexercise that297DTthat authority298NNauthority in299INin a300DTa manner301NNmanner that302WDTthat protects303VVZprotect Puerto304NPPuerto Rico305NPRico 's306POS's vital307JJvital ...308:... vital309JJvital interests310NNSinterest .311SENT. Now312RBnow Congress313NPCongress did314VVDdo build315VVbuild in316INin protections317NNSprotection to318TOto guarantee319VVguarantee the320DTthe Board321NPBoard 's322POS's independence323NNindependence .324SENT. Congress325NPCongress did326VVDdo that327IN/thatthat because328INbecause it329PPit concluded330VVDconclude that331IN/thatthat Puerto332NPPuerto Rico333NPRico 's334POS's staggering335JJstaggering financial336JJfinancial and337CCand humanitarian338JJhumanitarian crisis339NNcrisis could340MDcould not341RBnot be342VBbe solved343VVNsolve unless344INunless the345DTthe Board346NPBoard was347VBDbe insulated348VVNinsulate from349INfrom the350DTthe political351JJpolitical pressures352NNSpressure that353WDTthat caused354VVDcause that355DTthat crisis356NNcrisis in357INin the358DTthe first359JJfirst place360NNplace .361SENT. But362CCbut Congress363NPCongress also364RBalso insulated365VVDinsulate the366DTthe Board367NPBoard from368INfrom federal369JJfederal control370NNcontrol .371SENT. Board372NNboard members373NNSmember can374MDcan be375VBbe removed376VVNremove only377RBonly for378INfor cause379NNcause ,380,, which381WDTwhich means382VVZmean that383IN/thatthat the384DTthe President385NPPresident cannot386MDcan remove387VVremove them388PPthem based389VVNbase on390INon disagreement391NNdisagreement with392INwith the393DTthe Board394NPBoard 's395POS's policies396NNSpolicy or397CCor priorities398NNSpriority in399INin implementing400VVGimplement PROMESA401NPPROMESA .402SENT. When403WRBwhen you404PPyou put405VVDput all406RBall that407IN/thatthat together408RBtogether ,409,, it410PPit 's411VBZbe ...412:... the413DTthe Board414NPBoard is415VBZbe in416INin the417DTthe territorial418JJterritorial government419NNgovernment ,420,, it421PPit 's422VHZhave been423VBNbe given424VVNgive statutory425JJstatutory directives426NNSdirective to427TOto advance428VVadvance the429DTthe interests430NNSinterest of431INof Puerto432NPPuerto Rico433NPRico ,434,, and435CCand it436PPit 's437VBZbe insulated438VVNinsulate from439INfrom federal440JJfederal control441NNcontrol ,442,, it443PPit 's444VBZbe clear445JJclear that446IN/thatthat Board447NPBoard members448NNSmember are449VBPbe territorial450JJterritorial officials451NNSofficial ...452:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]453LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So454RBso how455WRBhow ...456:... [MR. VERRILLI]457LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...458:... not459RBnot officers460NNSofficer of461INof the462DTthe United463NPUnited States464NPSStates .465SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]466LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Mister467NPMister ...468:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]469LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...470:... how471WRBhow can472MDcan that473RBthat be474VBbe ,475,, Mr476NPMr .477SENT. Verrilli478NPVerrilli ?479SENT? It480PPit seems481VVZseem to482TOto me483PPme that484IN/thatthat your485PP$your very486JJvery argument487NNargument that488IN/thatthat it489PPit 's490VBZbe independent491JJindependent is492VBZbe suggesting493VVGsuggest it494PPit can495MDcan 't496RB't belong497VVbelong to498TOto the499DTthe territory500NNterritory and501CCand that502IN/thatthat there503EXthere 's504VBZbe a505DTa serious506JJserious problem507NNproblem that508IN/thatthat the509DTthe federal510JJfederal government511NNgovernment is512VBZbe creating513VVGcreate an514DTan entity515NNentity that516IN/thatthat no517DTno one518CDone can519MDcan control520VVcontrol .521SENT. Neither522CCneither Congress523NPCongress nor524CCnor the525DTthe President526NPPresident can527MDcan remove528VVremove this529DTthis entity530NNentity for531INfor anything532NNanything but533CCbut cause534NNcause .535SENT. Tell536VVtell me537PPme how538WRBhow this539DTthis differs540VVZdiffer from541INfrom a542DTa U543NPU .544SENT. S545NPS .546SENT. attorney547NNattorney .548SENT. A549DTa U550NPU .551SENT. S552NPS .553SENT. attorney554NNattorney is555VBZbe an556DTan officer557NNofficer of558INof the559DTthe United560NPUnited States561NPSStates .562SENT. I563PPI think564VVPthink you565PPyou accept566VVaccept that567DTthat .568SENT. A569DTa U570NPU .571SENT. S572NPS .573SENT. attorney574NNattorney is575VBZbe enforcing576VVGenforce federal577JJfederal law578NNlaw in579INin Puerto580NPPuerto Rico581NPRico ,582,, the583DTthe U584NPU .585SENT. S586NPS .587SENT. attorney588NNattorney of589INof Puerto590NPPuerto Rico591NPRico ,592,, just593RBjust the594DTthe way595NNway PROMESA596NPPROMESA is597VBZbe .598SENT. And599CCand a600DTa U601NPU .602SENT. S603NPS .604SENT. attorney605NNattorney does606VVZdo n't607RBn't have608VHhave jurisdiction609NNjurisdiction outside610NNoutside of611INof Puerto612NPPuerto Rico613NPRico .614SENT. So615RBso how616WRBhow is617VBZbe the618DTthe U619NPU .620SENT. S621NPS .622SENT. attorney623NNattorney different624JJdifferent ?625SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]626LOC[MR. VERRILLI] So627RBso let628VVlet me629PPme make630VVmake a631DTa general632JJgeneral point633NNpoint ,634,, and635CCand then636RBthen I637PPI 'll638MDwill specifically639RBspecifically answer640VVanswer the641DTthe U642NPU .643SENT. S644NPS .645SENT. attorney646NNattorney question647NNquestion .648SENT. The649DTthe general650JJgeneral point651NNpoint ,652,, I653PPI think654VVPthink it655PPit 's656VBZbe important657JJimportant to658TOto make659VVmake clear660JJclear ,661,, we662PPwe do663VVPdo n't664RBn't say665VVsay ,666,, contrary667JJcontrary to668TOto our669PP$our friends670NNSfriend on671INon the672DTthe other673JJother side674NNside ,675,, that676IN/thatthat the677DTthe Appointments678NNSappointment Clause679NNclause does680VVZdo n't681RBn't apply682VVapply in683INin Puerto684NPPuerto Rico685NPRico .686SENT. It687PPit applies688VVZapply in689INin Puerto690NPPuerto Rico691NPRico just692RBjust like693INlike it694PPit applies695VVZapply in696INin a697DTa state698NNstate ,699,, in700INin that701WDTthat federal702JJfederal officials703NNSofficial ,704,, officials705NNSofficial who706WPwho are707VBPbe part708NNpart of709INof the710DTthe federal711JJfederal government712NNgovernment ,713,, have714VHPhave to715TOto be716VBbe appointed717VVNappoint in718INin conformity719NNconformity with720INwith the721DTthe Appointments722NNSappointment Clause723NNclause ...724:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]725LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Could726MDcould you727PPyou do728VVdo this729DTthis ...730:... could731MDcould you732PPyou pass733VVpass ...734:... [MR. VERRILLI]735LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...736:... including737VVGinclude the738DTthe U739NPU .740SENT. S741NPS .742SENT. attorney743NNattorney .744SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]745LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...746:... could747MDcould you748PPyou pass749VVpass ...750:... could751MDcould Congress752NPCongress pass753VVpass a754DTa law755NNlaw that756WDTthat ...757:... like758INlike PROMESA759NPPROMESA for760INfor a761DTa state762NNstate ?763SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]764LOC[MR. VERRILLI] No765NPNo ,766,, I767PPI do768VVPdo n't769RBn't think770VVthink so771RBso ,772,, because773INbecause the774DTthe difference775NNdifference between776INbetween that777DTthat situation778NNsituation and779CCand this780DTthis situation781NNsituation is782VBZbe Article783NPArticle IV784NPIV .785SENT. And786CCand I787PPI really788RBreally think789VVPthink that790WDTthat gets791VVZget to792TOto the793DTthe heart794NNheart of795INof the796DTthe matter797NNmatter ,798,, Justice799NPJustice Sotomayor800NPSotomayor ,801,, that802WDTthat I803PPI think804VVPthink the805DTthe beef806NNbeef that807IN/thatthat my808PP$my friends809NNSfriend on810INon the811DTthe other812JJother side813NNside have814VHPhave is815VBZbe not816RBnot with817INwith the818DTthe Appointments819NNSappointment Clause820NNclause ;821:; it822PPit 's823VBZbe with824INwith Article825NPArticle IV826NPIV .827SENT. And828CCand the829DTthe difference830NNdifference between831INbetween this832DTthis situation833NNsituation and834CCand a835DTa state836NNstate is837VBZbe that838IN/thatthat Congress839NPCongress has840VHZhave reserved841VVNreserve authority842NNauthority under843INunder Article844NPArticle IV845NPIV to846TOto alter847VValter the848DTthe structure849NNstructure of850INof a851DTa territorial852JJterritorial government853NNgovernment and854CCand to855TOto prescribe856VVprescribe territorial857JJterritorial law858NNlaw ...859:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]860LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Could861MDcould you862PPyou ...863:... [MR. VERRILLI]864LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...865:... its866PP$its substantive867JJsubstantive territorial868JJterritorial law869NNlaw .870SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]871LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] ...872:... could873MDcould you874PPyou give875VVgive at876INat least877JJSleast a878DTa quick879JJquick answer880NNanswer ...881:... [MR. VERRILLI]882LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Sure883NPSure .884SENT. I885PPI 'd886MDwould be887VBbe ...888:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]889LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] ...890:... to891TOto the892DTthe first893JJfirst part894NNpart of895INof Justice896NPJustice Sotomayor897NPSotomayor 's898POS's question899NNquestion ?900SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]901LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Yes902NPYes .903SENT. Of904INof course905NNcourse .906SENT. The907DTthe difference908NNdifference ,909,, I910PPI think911VVPthink ,912,, the913DTthe key914JJkey difference915NNdifference between916INbetween a917DTa U918NPU .919SENT. S920NPS .921SENT. attorney922NNattorney and923CCand the924DTthe Board925NPBoard is926VBZbe that927IN/thatthat the928DTthe U929NPU .930SENT. S931NPS .932SENT. attorney933NNattorney is934VBZbe executing935VVGexecute laws936NNSlaw of937INof nationwide938JJnationwide application939NNapplication ,940,, the941DTthe ...942:... the943DTthe U944NPU .945SENT. S946NPS .947SENT. Criminal948NPCriminal Code949NPCode ,950,, Title951NPTitle 18952CD@card@ .953SENT. And954CCand the955DTthe U956NPU .957SENT. S958NPS .959SENT. attorney960NNattorney in961INin Puerto962NPPuerto Rico963NPRico in964INin that965DTthat respect966NNrespect is967VBZbe no968RBno different969JJdifferent than970INthan the971DTthe U972NPU .973SENT. S974NPS .975SENT. attorney976NNattorney in977INin New978NPNew York979NPYork .980SENT. The981DTthe Board982NPBoard does983VVZdo not984RBnot implement985VVimplement laws986NNSlaw of987INof nationwide988JJnationwide application989NNapplication .990SENT. It991PPit implements992VVZimplement as993INas law994NNlaw ...995:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]996LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But997CCbut all998DTall laws999NNSlaw do1000VVPdo n't1001RBn't have1002VHhave nationwide1003JJnationwide application1004NNapplication ,1005,, even1006RBeven federal1007JJfederal laws1008NNSlaw .1009SENT. Some1010DTsome federal1011JJfederal laws1012NNSlaw have1013VHPhave local1014JJlocal application1015NNapplication as1016INas opposed1017VVNoppose to1018TOto national1019JJnational .1020SENT. They1021PPthey 're1022VBPbe still1023RBstill federal1024JJfederal law1025NNlaw because1026INbecause they1027PPthey were1028VBDbe passed1029VVNpass by1030INby Congress1031NPCongress and1032CCand there1033RBthere federal1034JJfederal dictates1035NNSdictate .1036SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]1037LOC[MR. VERRILLI] But1038CCbut ...1039:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1040LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] This1041DTthis is1042VBZbe no1043RBno different1044JJdifferent for1045INfor the1046DTthe U1047NPU .1048SENT. S1049NPS .1050SENT. attorney1051NNattorney .1052SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]1053LOC[MR. VERRILLI] I1054PPI do1055VVPdo think1056VVthink it1057PPit 's1058VBZbe different1059JJdifferent in1060INin a1061DTa fundamental1062JJfundamental way1063NNway ,1064,, Your1065PP$your Honor1066NPHonor .1067SENT. It1068PPit is1069VBZbe territory-specific1070JJterritory-specific .1071SENT. It1072PPit applies1073VVZapply only1074RBonly to1075TOto the1076DTthe territory1077NNterritory of1078INof Puerto1079NPPuerto Rico1080NPRico .1081SENT. And1082CCand the1083DTthe Board1084NPBoard 's1085POS's authority1086NNauthority is1087VBZbe to1088TOto ...1089:... is1090VBZbe to1091TOto act1092VVact in1093INin the1094DTthe interests1095NNSinterest of1096INof the1097DTthe territory1098NNterritory of1099INof Puerto1100NPPuerto Rico1101NPRico in1102INin the1103DTthe ...1104:... in1105INin their1106PP$their ...1107:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]1108LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well1109UHWell ,1110,, Mr1111NPMr .1112SENT. Verrilli1113NPVerrilli ,1114,, I1115PPI mean1116VVPmean ,1117,, suppose1118VVPsuppose that1119IN/thatthat Congress1120NPCongress looks1121VVZlook at1122INat Florida1123NPFlorida and1124CCand it1125PPit says1126VVZsay that1127IN/thatthat there1128EXthere are1129VBPbe a1130DTa lot1131NNlot of1132INof hurricanes1133NNShurricane there1134RBthere and1135CCand the1136DTthe waters1137NNSwater are1138VBPbe rising1139VVGrise ,1140,, and1141CCand we1142PPwe have1143VHPhave a1144DTa terrible1145JJterrible Florida1146NPFlorida problem1147NNproblem .1148SENT. And1149CCand Congress1150NPCongress passes1151VVZpass the1152DTthe Florida1153NPFlorida Reclamation1154NNreclamation Act1155NPAct ,1156,, and1157CCand it1158PPit 's1159VBZbe supposed1160VVNsuppose to1161TOto deal1162VVdeal with1163INwith ,1164,, you1165PPyou know1166VVPknow ,1167,, the1168DTthe Florida1169NPFlorida problem1170NNproblem that1171IN/thatthat it1172PPit perceives1173VVZperceive but1174CCbut uses1175VVZuse federal1176JJfederal law1177NNlaw to1178TOto do1179VVdo so1180RBso .1181SENT. Would1182MDwould you1183PPyou say1184VVsay that1185DTthat ...1186:... I1187PPI think1188VVPthink the1189DTthe ...1190:... your1191PP$your ...1192:... your1193PP$your phrase1194NNphrase was1195VBDbe the1196DTthe executive1197JJexecutive power1198NNpower of1199INof the1200DTthe national1201JJnational government1202NNgovernment .1203SENT. Would1204MDwould the1205DTthe head1206NNhead of1207INof the1208DTthe agency1209NNagency that1210IN/thatthat the1211DTthe Florida1212NPFlorida Reclamation1213NNreclamation Act1214NPAct sets1215VVZset up1216RBup be1217VBbe exercising1218VVGexercise the1219DTthe executive1220JJexecutive power1221NNpower of1222INof the1223DTthe national1224JJnational government1225NNgovernment ?1226SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]1227LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Yes1228NPYes .1229SENT. And1230CCand the1231DTthe difference1232NNdifference is1233VBZbe ...1234:... I1235PPI 'm1236VBPbe sorry1237JJsorry ,1238,, Your1239PP$your Honor1240NPHonor .1241SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]1242LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] No1243NPNo ,1244,, I1245PPI was1246VBDbe just1247RBjust going1248VVGgo to1249TOto say1250VVsay ,1251,, what1252WPwhat is1253VBZbe the1254DTthe difference1255NNdifference ,1256,, Mr1257NPMr .1258SENT. Verrilli1259NPVerrilli ?1260SENT? [1261SYM[ LAUGHTER1262NNlaughter ]1263SYM] [MR. VERRILLI]1264LOC[MR. VERRILLI] And1265CCand the1266DTthe difference1267NNdifference ...1268:... and1269CCand the1270DTthe difference1271NNdifference is1272VBZbe ...1273:... and1274CCand the1275DTthe difference1276NNdifference is1277VBZbe that1278DTthat ...1279:... that1280IN/thatthat Congress1281NPCongress has1282VHZhave dual1283JJdual authority1284NNauthority with1285INwith respect1286NNrespect to1287TOto the1288DTthe territories1289NNSterritory to1290TOto act1291VVact under1292INunder Article1293NPArticle I1294NPI with1295INwith nation1296NNnation ...1297:... laws1298NNSlaw of1299INof nationwide1300JJnationwide application1301NNapplication ,1302,, which1303WDTwhich are1304VBPbe enforced1305VVNenforce by1306INby federal1307JJfederal officials1308NNSofficial .1309SENT. For1310INfor example1311NNexample ,1312,, there1313EXthere 's1314VBZbe a1315DTa FEMA1316NPFEMA regional1317JJregional administrator1318NNadministrator .1319SENT. There1320EXthere 's1321VBZbe an1322DTan EPA1323NPEPA regional1324JJregional administrator1325NNadministrator .1326SENT. They1327PPthey 're1328VBPbe all1329RBall appointed1330VVNappoint in1331INin conformity1332NNconformity with1333INwith the1334DTthe requirements1335NNSrequirement of1336INof the1337DTthe Appointments1338NNSappointment Clause1339NNclause .1340SENT. But1341CCbut it1342PPit has1343VHZhave dual1344JJdual authority1345NNauthority .1346SENT. It1347PPit can1348MDcan also1349RBalso act1350VVact as1351INas a1352DTa territorial1353JJterritorial legislature1354NNlegislature ,1355,, and1356CCand ...1357:... and1358CCand under1359INunder Article1360NPArticle IV1361NPIV ,1362,, it1363PPit has1364VHZhave plenary1365JJplenary authority1366NNauthority to1367TOto do1368VVdo so1369RBso .1370SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]1371LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well1372UHWell ,1373,, how1374WRBhow do1375VVPdo we1376PPwe know1377VVPknow which1378WDTwhich ...1379:... which1380WDTwhich authority1381NNauthority it1382PPit 's1383VBZbe using1384VVGuse ?1385SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]1386LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Well1387UHwell ,1388,, you1389PPyou look1390VVPlook ...1391:... I1392PPI ...1393:... I1394PPI think1395VVPthink as1396RBas ...1397:... we1398PPwe think1399VVPthink Palmore1400NPPalmore is1401VBZbe the1402DTthe relevant1403JJrelevant precedent1404NNprecedent there1405RBthere .1406SENT. And1407CCand I1408PPI think1409VVPthink what1410WPwhat you1411PPyou do1412VVPdo is1413VBZbe you1414PPyou look1415VVPlook to1416TOto two1417CDtwo things1418NNSthing .1419SENT. First1420NPFirst ,1421,, what1422WPwhat does1423VVZdo it1424PPit ...1425:... what1426WPwhat does1427VVZdo Congress1428NPCongress say1429VVsay it1430PPit 's1431VBZbe doing1432VVGdo .1433SENT. Here1434RBhere ,1435,, Congress1436NPCongress said1437VVDsay expressly1438RBexpressly we1439PPwe 're1440VBPbe invoking1441VVGinvoke Article1442NPArticle IV1443NPIV and1444CCand we1445PPwe 're1446VBPbe creating1447VVGcreate an1448DTan entity1449NNentity in1450INin the1451DTthe territorial1452JJterritorial government1453NNgovernment .1454SENT. That1455DTthat 's1456VBZbe the1457DTthe ...1458:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]1459LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] What1460WPWhat ...1461:... what's1462NNSwhat's ...1463:... [MR. VERRILLI]1464LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...1465:... language1466NNlanguage of1467INof the1468DTthe statute1469NNstatute ,1470,, entity1471NNentity ...1472:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]1473LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...1474:... what1475WPwhat 's1476VBZbe the1477DTthe argument1478NNargument ,1479,, Mr1480NPMr .1481SENT. Verrilli1482NPVerrilli ...1483:... you1484PPyou started1485VVDstart with1486INwith this1487DTthis is1488VBZbe an1489DTan ...1490:... this1491DTthis is1492VBZbe an1493DTan entity1494NNentity within1495INwithin the1496DTthe Puerto1497NPPuerto Rico1498NPRico government1499NNgovernment .1500SENT. The1501DTthe argument1502NNargument on1503INon the1504DTthe other1505JJother side1506NNside is1507VBZbe no1508UHno ,1509,, it1510PPit 's1511VBZbe not1512RBnot within1513INwithin ;1514:; it1515PPit 's1516VBZbe above1517JJabove .1518SENT. It1519PPit 's1520VBZbe above1521INabove the1522DTthe Puerto1523NPPuerto Rican1524JJRican government1525NNgovernment ,1526,, and1527CCand it1528PPit 's1529VBZbe ...1530:... it1531PPit 's1532VBZbe above1533INabove the1534DTthe legislature1535NNlegislature and1536CCand the1537DTthe governor1538NNgovernor .1539SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]1540LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Yes1541NPYes ,1542,, and1543CCand that1544WDTthat 's1545VBZbe ...1546:... and1547CCand that1548DTthat 's1549VBZbe simply1550RBsimply an1551DTan incorrect1552JJincorrect characterization1553NNcharacterization .1554SENT. I1555PPI think1556VVPthink it1557PPit misinterprets1558VVZmisinterpret independence1559NNindependence for1560INfor superintendence1561NNsuperintendence .1562SENT. And1563CCand I1564PPI think1565VVPthink ,1566,, if1567INif you1568PPyou think1569VVPthink about1570INabout it1571PPit ,1572,, it1573PPit 's1574VBZbe just1575RBjust not1576RBnot right1577JJright to1578TOto say1579VVsay that1580IN/thatthat what1581WPwhat you1582PPyou 've1583VHPhave got1584VVNget here1585RBhere is1586VBZbe a1587DTa federal1588JJfederal overlord1589NNoverlord or1590CCor a1591DTa federal1592JJfederal master1593NNmaster in1594INin the1595DTthe language1596NNlanguage of1597INof ...1598:... of1599INof the1600DTthe First1601NPFirst Circuit1602NPCircuit ,1603,, because1604INbecause think1605VVPthink about1606RBabout what1607WPwhat Congress1608NPCongress did1609VVDdo here1610RBhere .1611SENT. First1612RBfirst ,1613,, it1614PPit said1615VVDsay that1616IN/thatthat the1617DTthe ...1618:... that1619IN/thatthat the1620DTthe Board1621NPBoard 's1622POS's authority1623NNauthority is1624VBZbe territory-specific1625JJterritory-specific ,1626,, and1627CCand then1628RBthen it1629PPit said1630VVDsay that1631IN/thatthat the1632DTthe Board1633NPBoard is1634VBZbe supposed1635VVNsuppose to1636TOto act1637VVact on1638INon behalf1639NNbehalf of1640INof Puerto1641NPPuerto Rico1642NPRico and1643CCand represent1644VVrepresent Puerto1645NPPuerto Rico1646NPRico in1647INin the1648DTthe restructuring1649NNrestructuring proceedings1650NNSproceeding .1651SENT. It1652PPit 's1653VBZbe not1654RBnot supposed1655VVNsuppose to1656TOto advance1657VVadvance the1658DTthe broad1659JJbroad interests1660NNSinterest of1661INof the1662DTthe United1663NPUnited States1664NPSStates .1665SENT. It1666PPit advances1667VVZadvance Puerto1668NPPuerto Rico1669NPRico 's1670POS's interests1671NNSinterest .1672SENT. And1673CCand ,1674,, similarly1675RBsimilarly ,1676,, with1677INwith respect1678NNrespect to1679TOto its1680PP$its budget1681NNbudget ...1682:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]1683LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well1684UHWell ,1685,, was1686VBDbe n't1687RBn't Congress1688NPCongress thinking1689NNthinking about1690INabout the1691DTthe broad1692JJbroad interests1693NNSinterest of1694INof the1695DTthe United1696NPUnited States1697NPSStates ?1698SENT? I1699PPI mean1700VVPmean ,1701,, here1702RBhere it1703PPit was1704VBDbe .1705SENT. It1706PPit was1707VBDbe looking1708VVGlook at1709INat this1710DTthis terrible1711JJterrible financial1712JJfinancial crisis1713NNcrisis in1714INin Puerto1715NPPuerto Rico1716NPRico and1717CCand considering1718VVGconsider a1719DTa wide1720JJwide variety1721NNvariety of1722INof options1723NNSoption to1724TOto address1725VVaddress that1726DTthat crisis1727NNcrisis .1728SENT. Now1729RBnow one1730CDone option1731NNoption could1732MDcould have1733VHhave been1734VBNbe some1735DTsome kind1736NNkind of1737INof financial1738JJfinancial bailout1739NNbailout .1740SENT. Congress1741NPCongress did1742VVDdo n't1743RBn't want1744VVwant to1745TOto do1746VVdo that1747DTthat .1748SENT. It1749PPit instead1750RBinstead chose1751VVDchoose an1752DTan option1753NNoption that1754WDTthat had1755VHDhave less1756RBRless financial1757JJfinancial cost1758NNcost for1759INfor the1760DTthe American1761JJAmerican people1762NNSpeople as1763INas a1764DTa whole1765NNwhole .1766SENT. So1767RBso ,1768,, you1769PPyou know1770VVPknow ,1771,, why1772WRBwhy should1773MDshould n't1774RBn't we1775PPwe think1776VVPthink that1777IN/thatthat Congress1778NPCongress ,1779,, in1780INin enacting1781VVGenact this1782DTthis piece1783NNpiece of1784INof legislation1785NNlegislation ,1786,, was1787VBDbe not1788RBnot thinking1789VVGthink about1790INabout it1791PPit through1792INthrough a1793DTa broad1794JJbroad national1795JJnational lens1796NNlens ?1797SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]1798LOC[MR. VERRILLI] First1799NPFirst ,1800,, I1801PPI think1802VVPthink what1803WPwhat matters1804VVZmatter is1805VBZbe what1806WPwhat Congress1807NPCongress did1808VVDdo ,1809,, not1810RBnot what1811WPwhat the1812DTthe motivations1813NNSmotivation of1814INof individual1815JJindividual legislatures1816NNSlegislature were1817VBDbe in1818INin moving1819VVGmove forward1820RBforward with1821INwith what1822WPwhat Congress1823NPCongress did1824VVDdo .1825SENT. Second1826RBsecond ,1827,, the1828DTthe best1829JJSgood evidence1830NNevidence of1831INof what1832WPwhat Congress1833NPCongress did1834VVDdo is1835VBZbe the1836DTthe statute1837NNstatute itself1838PPitself ,1839,, where1840WRBwhere it1841PPit made1842VVDmake a1843DTa choice1844NNchoice to1845TOto create1846VVcreate an1847DTan entity1848NNentity in1849INin Puerto1850NPPuerto Rico1851NPRico and1852CCand it1853PPit instructed1854VVDinstruct it1855PPit to1856TOto act1857VVact on1858INon behalf1859NNbehalf of1860INof Puerto1861NPPuerto Rico1862NPRico .1863SENT. And1864CCand even1865RBeven with1866INwith respect1867NNrespect to1868TOto its1869PP$its budgeting1870NNbudgeting authority1871NNauthority ,1872,, it1873PPit said1874VVDsay when1875WRBwhen you1876PPyou do1877VVPdo your1878PP$your budgeting1879NNbudgeting and1880CCand fiscal1881JJfiscal planning1882NNplanning ,1883,, you1884PPyou 've1885VHPhave got1886VVNget to1887TOto ensure1888VVensure that1889IN/thatthat there1890EXthere 's1891VBZbe adequate1892JJadequate funding1893NNfunding for1894INfor essential1895JJessential services1896NNSservice in1897INin Puerto1898NPPuerto Rico1899NPRico ,1900,, adequate1901JJadequate funding1902NNfunding for1903INfor the1904DTthe Puerto1905NPPuerto Rico1906NPRico pension1907NNpension plan1908NNplan ,1909,, adequate1910JJadequate funding1911NNfunding for1912INfor economic1913JJeconomic development1914NNdevelopment in1915INin Puerto1916NPPuerto Rico1917NPRico .1918SENT. It1919PPit told1920VVDtell this1921DTthis Board1922NPBoard to1923TOto act1924VVact for1925INfor Puerto1926NPPuerto Rico1927NPRico .1928SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1929LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Counsel1930NPCounsel ,1931,, what1932WPwhat if1933INif we1934PPwe do1935VVPdo n't1936RBn't think1937VVthink it1938PPit 's1939VBZbe an1940DTan all1941RBall or1942CCor nothing1943NNnothing division1944NNdivision when1945WRBwhen you1946PPyou look1947VVPlook at1948INat the1949DTthe responsibilities1950NNSresponsibility of1951INof the1952DTthe Board1953NPBoard ?1954SENT? I1955PPI mean1956VVPmean ,1957,, certainly1958RBcertainly much1959RBmuch of1960INof it1961PPit has1962VHZhave to1963TOto do1964VVdo with1965INwith territorial1966JJterritorial issues1967NNSissue ,1968,, but1969CCbut you1970PPyou can1971MDcan certainly1972RBcertainly appreciate1973VVappreciate congressmen1974NNScongressman viewing1975VVGview this1976DTthis obviously1977RBobviously as1978INas something1979NNsomething with1980INwith nationwide1981JJnationwide significance1982NNsignificance .1983SENT. So1984RBso ,1985,, to1986TOto some1987DTsome extent1988NNextent ,1989,, it1990PPit 's1991VBZbe dealing1992VVGdeal with1993INwith territorial1994JJterritorial issues1995NNSissue .1996SENT. To1997TOTo some1998DTsome extent1999NNextent ,2000,, it2001PPit 's2002VBZbe dealing2003VVGdeal with2004INwith issues2005NNSissue of2006INof broader2007JJRbroad national2008JJnational significance2009NNsignificance .2010SENT. What2011WPWhat happens2012VVZhappen to2013TOto your2014PP$your case2015NNcase in2016INin that2017DTthat instance2018NNinstance ?2019SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]2020LOC[MR. VERRILLI] I2021PPI think2022VVPthink it2023PPit 's2024VBZbe ...2025:... I2026PPI think2027VVPthink the2028DTthe answer2029NNanswer is2030VBZbe the2031DTthe same2032JJsame ,2033,, because2034INbecause what2035WPwhat matters2036VVZmatter is2037VBZbe the2038DTthe power2039NNpower that2040IN/thatthat Congress2041NPCongress chose2042VVDchoose to2043TOto invoke2044VVinvoke and2045CCand the2046DTthe way2047NNway in2048INin which2049WDTwhich Congress2050NPCongress chose2051VVDchoose to2052TOto act2053VVact .2054SENT. And2055CCand what2056WPwhat Congress2057NPCongress did2058VVDdo here2059RBhere was2060VBDbe tell2061VVtell the2062DTthe Board2063NPBoard the2064DTthe way2065NNway to2066TOto address2067VVaddress this2068DTthis problem2069NNproblem is2070VBZbe by2071INby acting2072VVGact in2073INin the2074DTthe interests2075NNSinterest of2076INof Puerto2077NPPuerto Rico2078NPRico .2079SENT. And2080CCand then2081RBthen it2082PPit also2083RBalso insulated2084VVDinsulate the2085DTthe Board2086NPBoard from2087INfrom federal2088JJfederal control2089NNcontrol through2090INthrough the2091DTthe for2092INfor cause2093NNcause standard2094NNstandard .2095SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2096LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] May2097MDmay I2098PPI ask2099VVask you2100PPyou ,2101,, if2102INif we2103PPwe had2104VHDhave the2105DTthe original2106JJoriginal act2107NNact setting2108VVGset up2109RPup the2110DTthe U2111NPU .2112SENT. S2113NPS .2114SENT. Attorney2115NNattorney for2116INfor Puerto2117NPPuerto Rico2118NPRico and2119CCand Congress2120NPCongress changed2121VVDchange only2122RBonly one2123CDone label2124NNlabel of2125INof the2126DTthe three2127CDthree Palmore2128NPPalmore factors2129NNSfactor ,2130,, same2131JJsame factual2132JJfactual situation2133NNsituation as2134RBas exists2135VVZexist now2136RBnow ,2137,, except2138INexcept that2139WDTthat it2140PPit says2141VVZsay we2142PPwe 're2143VBPbe doing2144VVGdo it2145PPit under2146INunder the2147DTthe territorial2148JJterritorial clause2149NNclause .2150SENT. You2151PPyou 're2152VBPbe suggesting2153VVGsuggest that2154IN/thatthat that2155DTthat 's2156VBZbe enough2157RBenough reason2158NNreason for2159INfor why2160NNwhy ...2161:... [MR. VERRILLI]2162LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Absolutely2163RBabsolutely ...2164:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2165LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...2166:... our2167PP$our ...2168:... [MR. VERRILLI]2169LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...2170:... absolutely2171RBabsolutely not2172RBnot ,2173,, Your2174PP$your Honor2175NPHonor .2176SENT. And2177CCand that2178DTthat 's2179VBZbe why2180WRBwhy the2181DTthe third2182JJthird factor2183NNfactor in2184INin Palmore2185NPPalmore is2186VBZbe the2187DTthe critical2188JJcritical one2189CDone .2190SENT. You2191PPyou have2192VHPhave to2193TOto look2194VVlook at2195INat the2196DTthe nature2197NNnature of2198INof the2199DTthe authority2200NNauthority that2201IN/thatthat the2202DTthe office2203NNoffice is2204VBZbe executing2205VVGexecute .2206SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2207LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] All2208DTall right2209NNright .2210SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]2211LOC[MR. VERRILLI] And2212CCand they2213PPthey ...2214:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2215LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Now2216RBnow let2217VVlet me2218PPme ask2219VVask you2220PPyou how2221WRBhow you2222PPyou can2223MDcan label2224VVlabel this2225DTthis a2226DTa territorial2227JJterritorial officer2228NNofficer as2229INas opposed2230VVNoppose to2231TOto a2232DTa federal2233JJfederal officer2234NNofficer handling2235VVGhandle federal2236JJfederal issues2237NNSissue ...2238:... a2239DTa federal2240JJfederal mandate2241NNmandate when2242WRBwhen none2243NNnone of2244INof the2245DTthe people2246NNSpeople of2247INof Puerto2248NPPuerto Rico2249NPRico have2250VHPhave voted2251VVNvote in2252INin any2253DTany way2254NNway to2255TOto ...2256:... on2257INon any2258DTany of2259INof the2260DTthe directives2261NNSdirective that2262IN/thatthat this2263DTthis agent2264NNagent has2265VHZhave received2266VVNreceive ?2267SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]2268LOC[MR. VERRILLI] I2269PPI ...2270:... I2271PPI understand2272VVPunderstand that2273DTthat point2274NNpoint ,2275,, Your2276PP$your Honor2277NPHonor .2278SENT. But2279CCbut ,2280,, again2281RBagain ,2282,, I2283PPI do2284VVPdo n't2285RBn't think2286VVthink that2287WDTthat has2288VHZhave anything2289NNanything to2290TOto do2291VVdo with2292INwith the2293DTthe Appointments2294NNSappointment Clause2295NNclause .2296SENT. There2297EXthere is2298VBZbe no2299DTno doubt2300NNdoubt under2301INunder this2302DTthis Court2303NPCourt 's2304POS's precedence2305NNprecedence ,2306,, starting2307VVGstart two2308CDtwo centuries2309NNScentury ago2310RBago ,2311,, and2312CCand as2313RBas recently2314RBrecently as2315INas Sanchez2316NPSanchez Valle2317NPValle ,2318,, that2319IN/thatthat the2320DTthe Congress2321NPCongress has2322VHZhave reserved2323VVNreserve authority2324NNauthority to2325TOto act2326VVact at2327INat the2328DTthe territorial2329JJterritorial level2330NNlevel and2331CCand to2332TOto change2333VVchange the2334DTthe structure2335NNstructure of2336INof ...2337:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2338LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Certainly2339RBcertainly .2340SENT. There2341EXthere 's2342VBZbe no2343DTno question2344NNquestion .2345SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]2346LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...2347:... territorial2348JJterritorial government2349NNgovernment and2350CCand to2351TOto change2352VVchange the2353DTthe substance2354NNsubstance .2355SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2356LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] There2357EXthere 's2358VBZbe no2359DTno fight2360NNfight ...2361:... there2362EXthere 's2363VBZbe no2364DTno fight2365NNfight there2366RBthere .2367SENT. The2368DTthe issue2369NNissue is2370VBZbe where2371WRBwhere do2372VVPdo you2373PPyou draw2374VVdraw a2375DTa line2376NNline between2377INbetween what2378WPwhat 's2379VBZbe a2380DTa federal2381JJfederal officer2382NNofficer and2383CCand what2384WPwhat 's2385VBZbe a2386DTa territorial2387JJterritorial officer2388NNofficer .2389SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]2390LOC[MR. VERRILLI] And2391CCand I2392PPI think2393VVPthink ...2394:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2395LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] And2396CCand the2397DTthe issue2398NNissue has2399VHZhave to2400TOto be2401VBbe that2402IN/thatthat when2403WRBwhen Congress2404NPCongress chooses2405VVZchoose ,2406,, it2407PPit 's2408VBZbe Congress2409NPCongress 's2410POS's choice2411NNchoice .2412SENT. If2413INif the2414DTthe territory2415NNterritory chooses2416VVZchoose ,2417,, if2418INif it2419PPit elects2420VVZelect a2421DTa governor2422NNgovernor ,2423,, if2424INif it2425PPit elects2426VVZelect legislature2427NNlegislature ,2428,, if2429INif it2430PPit elects2431VVZelect its2432PP$its own2433JJown Attorney2434NPAttorney General2435NPGeneral ,2436,, that2437IN/thatthat those2438DTthose are2439VBPbe officers2440NNSofficer that2441IN/thatthat Puerto2442NPPuerto Rico2443NPRico have2444VHPhave selected2445VVNselect .2446SENT. But2447CCbut ,2448,, if2449INif the2450DTthe federal2451JJfederal government2452NNgovernment is2453VBZbe making2454VVGmake the2455DTthe selection2456NNselection and2457CCand imposing2458VVGimpose it2459PPit on2460INon a2461DTa territory2462NNterritory ,2463,, it2464PPit has2465VHZhave to2466TOto be2467VBbe a2468DTa federal2469JJfederal officer2470NNofficer .2471SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]2472LOC[MR. VERRILLI] I2473PPI ...2474:... that2475WDTthat 's2476VBZbe ...2477:... I2478PPI ...2479:... I2480PPI ...2481:... I2482PPI think2483VVPthink that2484WDTthat 's2485VBZbe just2486RBjust not2487RBnot right2488JJright on2489INon numerous2490JJnumerous levels2491NNSlevel ,2492,, Your2493PP$your Honor2494NPHonor ,2495,, and2496CCand ...2497:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2498LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] No2499RBno ,2500,, it2501PPit 's2502VBZbe too2503RBtoo simplistic2504JJsimplistic for2505INfor you2506PPyou .2507SENT. [2508SYM[ LAUGHTER2509NNlaughter ]2510SYM] [MR. VERRILLI]2511LOC[MR. VERRILLI] No2512UHNo ,2513,, no2514UHno ,2515,, no2516UHno ,2517,, no2518UHno .2519SENT. The2520DTthe main2521JJmain ...2522:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2523LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That's2524NPThat's ...2525:... that2526WDTthat 's2527VBZbe the2528DTthe problem2529NNproblem that2530IN/thatthat everybody2531NNeverybody ...2532:... [MR. VERRILLI]2533LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...2534:... one2535CDone of2536INof the2537DTthe main2538JJmain reasons2539NNSreason which2540WDTwhich it2541PPit 's2542VBZbe not2543RBnot right2544RBright ,2545,, I2546PPI think2547VVPthink ,2548,, is2549VBZbe that2550IN/thatthat it2551PPit 's2552VBZbe not2553RBnot consistent2554JJconsistent with2555INwith the2556DTthe history2557NNhistory of2558INof this2559DTthis country2560NNcountry .2561SENT. And2562CCand if2563INif you2564PPyou start2565VVPstart with2566INwith the2567DTthe mayor2568NNmayor of2569INof Washington2570NPWashington in2571INin 18022572CD@card@ ...2573:... now2574RBnow ,2575,, admittedly2576RBadmittedly ,2577,, it2578PPit 's2579VBZbe the2580DTthe Enclave2581NNenclave Clause2582NNclause ,2583,, not2584RBnot the2585DTthe Territories2586NPTerritories Clause2587NNclause ,2588,, but2589CCbut the2590DTthe Court2591NPCourt has2592VHZhave said2593VVNsay that2594IN/thatthat there2595EXthere are2596VBPbe provisions2597NNSprovision that2598WDTthat should2599MDshould be2600VBbe read2601VVNread in2602INin the2603DTthe same2604JJsame way2605NNway ...2606:... if2607INif ...2608:... if2609INif you2610PPyou start2611VVPstart with2612INwith that2613DTthat ,2614,, the2615DTthe mayor2616NNmayor of2617INof Washington2618NPWashington was2619VBDbe appointed2620VVNappoint ...2621:... was2622VBDbe ...2623:... Congress2624NPCongress created2625VVDcreate the2626DTthe position2627NNposition of2628INof mayor2629NNmayor of2630INof Washington2631NPWashington under2632INunder a2633DTa statute2634NNstatute .2635SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2636LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] That2637DTthat ...2638:... that2639WDTthat 's2640VBZbe one2641CDone ...2642:... I2643PPI mean2644VVPmean ,2645,, that2646WDTthat 's2647VBZbe one2648CDone example2649NNexample .2650SENT. But2651CCbut the2652DTthe other2653JJother side2654NNside says2655VVZsay the2656DTthe historical2657JJhistorical practice2658NNpractice is2659VBZbe otherwise2660RBotherwise overwhelming2661JJoverwhelming in2662INin ...2663:... up2664RBup until2665INuntil about2666INabout the2667DTthe 1950s2668NNS1950s ,2669,, of2670INof saying2671VVGsay that2672IN/thatthat territorial2673JJterritorial officers2674NNSofficer had2675VHDhave to2676TOto be2677VBbe appointed2678VVNappoint by2679INby the2680DTthe President2681NPPresident with2682INwith the2683DTthe advice2684NNadvice and2685CCand consent2686NNconsent of2687INof the2688DTthe Senate2689NPSenate .2690SENT. So2691RBso how2692WRBhow do2693VVPdo we2694PPwe deal2695VVdeal with2696INwith that2697DTthat historical2698JJhistorical practice2699NNpractice ?2700SENT? You2701PPyou do2702VVPdo have2703VHhave the2704DTthe mayor2705NNmayor example2706NNexample ,2707,, so2708RBso it2709PPit 's2710VBZbe not2711RBnot uniform2712JJuniform .2713SENT. But2714CCbut how2715WRBhow do2716VVPdo we2717PPwe deal2718VVdeal with2719INwith that2720DTthat historical2721JJhistorical practice2722NNpractice ?2723SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]2724LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Two2725CDTwo points2726NNSpoint .2727SENT. First2728JJfirst on2729INon the2730DTthe mayor2731NNmayor .2732SENT. I2733PPI think2734VVPthink the2735DTthe mayor2736NNmayor of2737INof Washington2738NPWashington is2739VBZbe an2740DTan extremely2741RBextremely significant2742JJsignificant historical2743JJhistorical marker2744NNmarker because2745INbecause ,2746,, after2747INafter all2748DTall ,2749,, the2750DTthe Presidents2751NPSPresidents who2752WPwho made2753VVDmake those2754DTthose appointments2755NNSappointment every2756DTevery year2757NNyear during2758INduring that2759DTthat period2760NNperiod were2761VBDbe Jefferson2762NPJefferson and2763CCand Madison2764NPMadison ,2765,, and2766CCand if2767INif they2768PPthey had2769VHDhave thought2770VVNthink that2771IN/thatthat their2772PP$their ...2773:... that2774IN/thatthat the2775DTthe Appointments2776NNSappointment Clause2777NNclause applied2778VVNapply in2779INin a2780DTa situation2781NNsituation like2782INlike that2783DTthat ...2784:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2785LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I2786PPI ...2787:... I2788PPI ...2789:... [MR. VERRILLI]2790LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...2791:... certainly2792RBcertainly ,2793,, we2794PPwe would2795MDwould have2796VHhave heard2797VVNhear about2798INabout that2799DTthat .2800SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2801LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...2802:... I2803PPI agree2804VVPagree with2805INwith you2806PPyou ...2807:... I2808PPI agree2809VVPagree with2810INwith you2811PPyou ...2812:... [MR. VERRILLI]2813LOC[MR. VERRILLI] And2814CCand now2815RBnow we're2816JJwe're ...2817:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2818LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...2819:... it2820PPit 's2821VBZbe important2822JJimportant ,2823,, but2824CCbut assume2825VVassume the2826DTthe history2827NNhistory is2828VBZbe still2829RBstill ...2830:... [MR. VERRILLI]2831LOC[MR. VERRILLI] But2832CCbut ...2833:... but2834CCbut with2835INwith respect2836NNrespect ...2837:... the2838DTthe history2839NNhistory they2840PPthey have2841VHPhave essentially2842RBessentially is2843VBZbe that2844IN/thatthat territorial2845JJterritorial governors2846NNSgovernor up2847RBup until2848INuntil the2849DTthe 1950s2850NNS1950s were2851VBDbe appointed2852VVNappoint with2853INwith advice2854NNadvice and2855CCand consent2856NNconsent .2857SENT. But2858CCbut ...2859:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2860LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And2861CCand judges2862NNSjudge .2863SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]2864LOC[MR. VERRILLI] And2865CCand territorial2866JJterritorial judges2867NNSjudge .2868SENT. But2869CCbut I2870PPI actually2871RBactually think2872VVPthink that2873DTthat ...2874:... let2875VVlet 's2876VBZbe go2877VVgo right2878RBright to2879TOto the2880DTthe judges2881NNSjudge point2882VVPpoint because2883INbecause I2884PPI think2885VVPthink that2886IN/thatthat actually2887RBactually proves2888VVZprove our2889PP$our position2890NNposition and2891CCand not2892RBnot theirs2893PPtheirs ,2894,, because2895INbecause even2896RBeven though2897INthough territorial2898JJterritorial judges2899NNSjudge were2900VBDbe always2901RBalways nominated2902VVNnominate by2903INby the2904DTthe President2905NPPresident ,2906,, confirmed2907VVNconfirm by2908INby the2909DTthe Senate2910NPSenate ,2911,, this2912DTthis Court2913NPCourt held2914VVDhold starting2915VVGstart in2916INin Cantor2917NPCantor and2918CCand then2919RBthen also2920RBalso in2921INin Englebrecht2922NPEnglebrecht and2923CCand McAllister2924NPMcAllister that2925IN/thatthat they2926PPthey were2927VBDbe n't2928RBn't judicial2929JJjudicial officers2930NNSofficer of2931INof the2932DTthe United2933NPUnited States2934NPSStates ,2935,, despite2936INdespite the2937DTthe fact2938NNfact that2939IN/thatthat the2940DTthe President2941NPPresident nominated2942VVDnominate them2943PPthem and2944CCand the2945DTthe Senate2946NPSenate confirmed2947VVDconfirm them2948PPthem .2949SENT. And2950CCand then2951RBthen ,2952,, to2953TOto reinforce2954VVreinforce that2955IN/thatthat ,2956,, there2957EXthere have2958VHPhave been2959VBNbe three2960CDthree times2961NNStime in2962INin the2963DTthe country2964NNcountry 's2965POS's history2966NNhistory where2967WRBwhere a2968DTa question2969NNquestion arose2970VVDarise about2971RBabout whether2972INwhether a2973DTa territorial2974JJterritorial judge2975NNjudge could2976MDcould be2977VBbe impeached2978VVNimpeach by2979INby Congress2980NPCongress .2981SENT. And2982CCand in2983INin each2984DTeach of2985INof those2986DTthose three2987CDthree instances2988NNSinstance ,2989,, the2990DTthe political2991JJpolitical branches2992NNSbranch concluded2993VVDconclude that2994IN/thatthat a2995DTa territorial2996JJterritorial judge2997NNjudge could2998MDcould not2999RBnot be3000VBbe impeached3001VVNimpeach because3002INbecause a3003DTa territorial3004JJterritorial judge3005NNjudge was3006VBDbe not3007RBnot a3008DTa civil3009JJcivil officer3010NNofficer of3011INof the3012DTthe United3013NPUnited States3014NPSStates but3015CCbut only3016RBonly an3017DTan officer3018NNofficer of3019INof the3020DTthe territory3021NNterritory exercising3022VVGexercise territorial3023JJterritorial power3024NNpower .3025SENT. Now3026RBnow ,3027,, with3028INwith respect3029NNrespect to3030TOto the3031DTthe governors3032NNSgovernor ,3033,, of3034INof course3035NNcourse ,3036,, you3037PPyou know3038VVPknow ,3039,, the3040DTthe ...3041:... the3042DTthe Appointments3043NNSappointment Clause3044NNclause is3045VBZbe not3046RBnot an3047DTan either3048RBeither /3049SYM/ or3050CCor proposition3051NNproposition .3052SENT. If3053INif it3054PPit applies3055VVZapply to3056TOto the3057DTthe governors3058NNSgovernor as3059INas principal3060JJprincipal officers3061NNSofficer ,3062,, it3063PPit applies3064VVZapply to3065TOto the3066DTthe people3067NNSpeople the3068DTthe governor3069NNgovernor appoints3070VVZappoint as3071INas inferior3072JJinferior officers3073NNSofficer .3074SENT. But3075CCbut starting3076VVGstart with3077INwith the3078DTthe Northwest3079NPNorthwest Ordinance3080NPOrdinance and3081CCand continuing3082VVGcontinue throughout3083INthroughout the3084DTthe country3085NNcountry 's3086POS's history3087NNhistory ,3088,, inferior3089JJinferior officers3090NNSofficer have3091VHPhave been3092VBNbe appointed3093VVNappoint in3094INin manners3095NNSmanner that3096WDTthat do3097VVPdo n't3098RBn't comply3099VVcomply with3100INwith the3101DTthe Appointments3102NNSappointment Clause3103NNclause .3104SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]3105LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Does3106VVZdo it3107PPit just3108RBjust ...3109:... does3110VVZdo it3111PPit strike3112VVstrike you3113PPyou as3114INas a3115DTa little3116RBlittle strange3117JJstrange ,3118,, Mr3119NPMr .3120SENT. Verrilli3121NPVerrilli ,3122,, to3123TOto use3124VVuse the3125DTthe history3126NNhistory in3127INin this3128DTthis kind3129NNkind of3130INof case3131NNcase so3132RBso extensively3133RBextensively ?3134SENT? I3135PPI mean3136VVPmean ,3137,, first3138RBfirst ,3139,, it3140PPit 's3141VBZbe a3142DTa little3143JJlittle bit3144NNbit all3145RBall over3146INover the3147DTthe map3148NNmap and3149CCand you3150PPyou each3151DTeach have3152VHPhave your3153PP$your historical3154JJhistorical examples3155NNSexample to3156TOto point3157VVpoint to3158TOto .3159SENT. But3160CCbut ,3161,, second3162RBsecond ,3163,, the3164DTthe position3165NNposition of3166INof territories3167NNSterritory currently3168RBcurrently is3169VBZbe so3170RBso different3171JJdifferent from3172INfrom the3173DTthe position3174NNposition of3175INof territories3176NNSterritory throughout3177INthroughout much3178JJmuch or3179CCor most3180JJSmost of3181INof our3182PP$our history3183NNhistory .3184SENT. So3185INso I3186PPI ...3187:... I3188PPI guess3189VVPguess it3190PPit seems3191VVZseem to3192TOto me3193PPme more3194RBRmore natural3195JJnatural ,3196,, rather3197RBrather than3198INthan to3199TOto look3200VVlook to3201TOto ,3202,, you3203PPyou know3204VVPknow ,3205,, what3206WPwhat the3207DTthe Northwest3208NPNorthwest Ordinance3209NPOrdinance did3210VVDdo ,3211,, is3212VBZbe ...3213:... is3214VBZbe simply3215RBsimply to3216TOto use3217VVuse a3218DTa kind3219NNkind of3220INof functional3221JJfunctional test3222NNtest and3223CCand say3224VVPsay are3225VBPbe these3226DTthese people3227NNSpeople doing3228VVGdo the3229DTthe sorts3230NNSsort of3231INof things3232NNSthing that3233WDTthat would3234MDwould be3235VBbe done3236VVNdo by3237INby state3238NNstate officials3239NNSofficial in3240INin states3241NNSstate ,3242,, or3243CCor are3244VBPbe they3245PPthey doing3246VVGdo the3247DTthe sorts3248NNSsort of3249INof things3250NNSthing that3251WDTthat would3252MDwould be3253VBbe done3254VVNdo by3255INby federal3256JJfederal officials3257NNSofficial ?3258SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]3259LOC[MR. VERRILLI] So3260INso two3261CDtwo things3262NNSthing .3263SENT. First3264RBfirst ,3265,, respectfully3266RBrespectfully ,3267,, we3268PPwe think3269VVPthink ,3270,, in3271INin interpreting3272VVGinterpret the3273DTthe meaning3274NNmeaning of3275INof the3276DTthe phrase3277NNphrase "3278''" officer3279NNofficer of3280INof the3281DTthe United3282NPUnited States3283NPSStates ,3284,, "3285''" which3286WDTwhich is3287VBZbe the3288DTthe job3289NNjob that3290WDTthat has3291VHZhave to3292TOto be3293VBbe done3294VVNdo in3295INin this3296DTthis case3297NNcase ,3298,, the3299DTthe history3300NNhistory is3301VBZbe very3302RBvery ,3303,, very3304RBvery relevant3305JJrelevant .3306SENT. But3307CCbut ,3308,, second3309RBsecond ,3310,, even3311RBeven if3312INif one3313PPone takes3314VVZtake a3315DTa functional3316JJfunctional analysis3317NNanalysis ,3318,, I3319PPI think3320VVPthink the3321DTthe right3322JJright way3323NNway to3324TOto look3325VVlook at3326INat the3327DTthe functional3328JJfunctional analysis3329NNanalysis is3330VBZbe to3331TOto look3332VVlook at3333INat the3334DTthe ...3335:... what3336WPwhat the3337DTthe Board3338NPBoard is3339VBZbe actually3340RBactually charged3341VVNcharge with3342INwith doing3343VVGdo .3344SENT. And3345CCand what3346WPwhat the3347DTthe Board3348NPBoard is3349VBZbe actually3350RBactually charged3351VVNcharge with3352INwith doing3353VVGdo is3354VBZbe acting3355VVGact in3356INin the3357DTthe shoes3358NNSshoe of3359INof the3360DTthe government3361NNgovernment of3362INof Puerto3363NPPuerto Rico3364NPRico in3365INin the3366DTthe restructuring3367NNrestructuring proceedings3368NNSproceeding and3369CCand acting3370VVGact as3371INas an3372DTan independent3373JJindependent entity3374NNentity insulated3375VVNinsulate from3376INfrom political3377JJpolitical pressure3378NNpressure within3379INwithin the3380DTthe budgeting3381NNbudgeting proceedings3382NNSproceeding ,3383,, but3384CCbut ...3385:... but3386CCbut constrained3387VVNconstrain by3388INby statute3389NNstatute to3390TOto act3391VVact on3392INon behalf3393NNbehalf of3394INof ,3395,, in3396INin the3397DTthe interests3398NNSinterest of3399INof ,3400,, for3401INfor the3402DTthe territory3403NNterritory .3404SENT. So3405RBso ...3406:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3407LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well3408UHWell ...3409:... [MR. VERRILLI]3410LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...3411:... if3412INif you3413PPyou 're3414VBPbe going3415VVGgo to3416TOto use3417VVuse a3418DTa functional3419JJfunctional approach3420NNapproach ,3421,, they3422PPthey 're3423VBPbe very3424RBvery much3425JJmuch like3426INlike a3427DTa state3428NNstate government3429NNgovernment ,3430,, not3431RBnot a3432DTa federal3433JJfederal overlord3434NNoverlord .3435SENT. And3436CCand I3437PPI think3438VVPthink this3439DTthis would3440MDwould actually3441RBactually be3442VBbe kind3443NNkind of3444INof a3445DTa crazy3446JJcrazy system3447NNsystem if3448INif what3449WPwhat you3450PPyou wanted3451VVDwant to3452TOto do3453VVdo was3454VBDbe create3455VVcreate a3456DTa federal3457JJfederal overlord3458NNoverlord to3459TOto say3460VVsay :3461:: You3462PPyou 're3463VBPbe a3464DTa federal3465JJfederal overlord3466NNoverlord .3467SENT. Take3468VVtake the3469DTthe national3470JJnational interests3471NNSinterest into3472INinto account3473NNaccount ,3474,, but3475CCbut ,3476,, when3477WRBwhen you3478PPyou actually3479RBactually administer3480VVadminister the3481DTthe ...3482:... the3483DTthe authority3484NNauthority you3485PPyou have3486VHPhave ,3487,, you3488PPyou have3489VHPhave to3490TOto only3491RBonly focus3492VVfocus ...3493:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3494LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] What3495WPWhat do3496VVPdo we3497PPwe do3498VVPdo about3499INabout the3500DTthe brief3501NNbrief ...3502:... [MR. VERRILLI]3503LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...3504:... on3505INon territorial3506JJterritorial interests3507NNSinterest .3508SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3509LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...3510:... what3511WPwhat do3512VVPdo we3513PPwe do3514VVPdo about3515INabout the3516DTthe brief3517NNbrief of3518INof at3519INat least3520JJSleast there3521EXthere 's3522VBZbe one3523CDone amicus3524NNamicus that3525WDTthat suggests3526VVZsuggest that3527IN/thatthat in3528INin one3529CDone of3530INof the3531DTthe litigations3532NNSlitigation that3533WDTthat 's3534VBZbe ongoing3535JJongoing ,3536,, with3537INwith respect3538NNrespect to3539TOto PROMESA3540NPPROMESA ,3541,, that3542IN/thatthat there3543EXthere 's3544VBZbe all3545DTall sorts3546NNSsort of3547INof evidence3548NNevidence that3549IN/thatthat the3550DTthe Board3551NPBoard is3552VBZbe taking3553VVGtake directives3554NNSdirective from3555INfrom federal3556JJfederal officials3557NNSofficial ?3558SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]3559LOC[MR. VERRILLI] So3560INso I3561PPI ...3562:... you3563PPyou know3564VVPknow ,3565,, that3566DTthat brief3567NNbrief ,3568,, you3569PPyou know3570VVPknow ,3571,, respectfully3572RBrespectfully ,3573,, Your3574PP$your Honor3575NPHonor ,3576,, I3577PPI ...3578:... I3579PPI think3580VVPthink that3581WDTthat shows3582VVZshow the3583DTthe perils3584NNSperil of3585INof relying3586VVGrely on3587INon an3588DTan amicus3589NNamicus brief3590NNbrief that3591WDTthat relies3592VVZrely on3593INon extra-record3594NNextra-record information3595NNinformation .3596SENT. The3597DTthe vast3598JJvast majority3599NNmajority of3600INof those3601DTthose ...3602:... of3603INof the3604DTthe ...3605:... the3606DTthe documents3607NNSdocument there3608RBthere have3609VHPhave not3610RBnot been3611VBNbe disclosed3612VVNdisclose .3613SENT. But3614CCbut ,3615,, if3616INif I3617PPI may3618MDmay talk3619VVtalk about3620INabout them3621PPthem ,3622,, because3623INbecause I3624PPI 've3625VHPhave been3626VBNbe asked3627VVNask about3628INabout them3629PPthem ,3630,, the3631DTthe ...3632:... the3633DTthe ...3634:... the3635DTthe vast3636JJvast majority3637NNmajority of3638INof those3639DTthose are3640VBPbe communications3641NNScommunication from3642INfrom federal3643JJfederal government3644NNgovernment officials3645NNSofficial to3646TOto the3647DTthe Board3648NPBoard in3649INin the3650DTthe wake3651NNwake of3652INof the3653DTthe disasters3654NNSdisaster and3655CCand the3656DTthe hurricanes3657NNShurricane saying3658VVGsay we3659PPwe need3660VVPneed information3661NNinformation about3662INabout what3663WPwhat 's3664VBZbe going3665VVGgo on3666INon on3667INon the3668DTthe ground3669NNground here3670RBhere .3671SENT. And3672CCand so3673RBso it3674PPit was3675VBDbe ...3676:... it3677PPit was3678VBDbe informational3679JJinformational ,3680,, the3681DTthe overwhelming3682JJoverwhelming majority3683NNmajority of3684INof them3685PPthem .3686SENT. Now3687RBnow they3688PPthey did3689VVDdo find3690VVfind one3691CDone communication3692NNcommunication from3693INfrom a3694DTa Senate3695NPSenate staffer3696NNstaffer ,3697,, I3698PPI think3699VVPthink ,3700,, or3701CCor a3702DTa House3703NPHouse staffer3704NNstaffer ,3705,, I3706PPI think3707VVPthink a3708DTa Senate3709NPSenate staffer3710NNstaffer ,3711,, saying3712VVGsay we3713PPwe want3714VVPwant you3715PPyou to3716TOto resolve3717VVresolve Issue3718NPIssue X3719NPX this3720DTthis way3721NNway .3722SENT. Again3723RBagain ,3724,, I3725PPI 've3726VHPhave got3727VVNget to3728TOto be3729VBbe outside3730INoutside the3731DTthe record3732NNrecord to3733TOto ...3734:... to3735TOto answer3736VVanswer that3737DTthat .3738SENT. But3739CCbut ,3740,, basically3741RBbasically ,3742,, the3743DTthe Board3744NPBoard told3745VVDtell them3746PPthem to3747TOto pound3748NNpound sand3749NNsand .3750SENT. And3751CCand so3752RBso I3753PPI do3754VVPdo n't3755RBn't think3756VVthink there3757EXthere 's3758VBZbe any3759DTany merit3760NNmerit to3761TOto it3762PPit whatsoever3763RBwhatsoever .3764SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3765LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank3766VVthank you3767PPyou ,3768,, counsel3769NNcounsel .3770SENT. General3771NPGeneral Wall3772NPWall .3773SENT.

[MR. WALL J.B.]3774LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Mr3775NPMr .3776SENT. Chief3777NPChief Justice3778NPJustice ,3779,, and3780CCand may3781MDmay it3782PPit please3783VVplease the3784DTthe Court3785NPCourt :3786:: We3787PPwe know3788VVPknow that3789IN/thatthat Congress3790NPCongress expressly3791RBexpressly invoked3792VVDinvoke its3793PP$its authority3794NNauthority over3795INover the3796DTthe territories3797NNSterritory and3798CCand placed3799VVDplace the3800DTthe Board3801NPBoard within3802INwithin the3803DTthe Puerto3804NPPuerto Rican3805JJRican government3806NNgovernment .3807SENT. So3808INso the3809DTthe real3810JJreal question3811NNquestion here3812RBhere is3813VBZbe ,3814,, was3815VBDbe that3816DTthat choice3817NNchoice constitutional3818JJconstitutional under3819INunder Article3820NPArticle IV3821NPIV ?3822SENT? It3823PPit was3824VBDbe .3825SENT. The3826DTthe Board3827NPBoard budgets3828NNSbudget and3829CCand restructures3830VVZrestructure debt3831NNdebt only3832RBonly for3833INfor Puerto3834NPPuerto Rico3835NPRico .3836SENT. It3837PPit acts3838VVZact in3839INin the3840DTthe territory3841NNterritory under3842INunder a3843DTa territory-specific3844JJterritory-specific statute3845NNstatute .3846SENT. In3847INin our3848PP$our view3849NNview ,3850,, Mr3851NPMr .3852SENT. Chief3853NPChief Justice3854NPJustice ,3855,, the3856DTthe Board3857NPBoard 's3858POS's focus3859NNfocus is3860VBZbe exclusively3861RBexclusively local3862JJlocal ,3863,, but3864CCbut ,3865,, at3866INat a3867DTa minimum3868NNminimum ,3869,, it3870PPit 's3871VBZbe primarily3872RBprimarily local3873JJlocal ,3874,, which3875WDTwhich is3876VBZbe the3877DTthe appropriate3878JJappropriate test3879NNtest under3880INunder Palmore3881NPPalmore .3882SENT. Justice3883NPJustice Kagan3884NPKagan ,3885,, Congress3886NPCongress could3887MDcould have3888VHhave legislated3889VVNlegislate directly3890RBdirectly .3891SENT. It3892PPit could3893MDcould have3894VHhave put3895VVNput this3896DTthis in3897INin the3898DTthe Treasury3899NPTreasury Department3900NPDepartment .3901SENT. If3902INif it3903PPit had3904VHDhave n't3905RBn't otherwise3906RBotherwise specified3907VVNspecify ,3908,, the3909DTthe powers3910NNSpower would3911MDwould have3912VHhave gone3913VVNgo to3914TOto the3915DTthe assembly3916NNassembly and3917CCand the3918DTthe governor3919NNgovernor with3920INwith respect3921NNrespect to3922TOto restructuring3923VVGrestructure the3924DTthe debt3925NNdebt and3926CCand representing3927VVGrepresent the3928DTthe Commonwealth3929NNcommonwealth in3930INin these3931DTthese Title3932NPTitle III3933NPIII proceedings3934NNSproceeding .3935SENT. It3936PPit did3937VVDdo n't3938RBn't want3939VVwant that3940DTthat .3941SENT. It3942PPit wanted3943VVDwant new3944JJnew and3945CCand independent3946JJindependent territorial3947JJterritorial officers3948NNSofficer on3949INon the3950DTthe ground3951NNground in3952INin Puerto3953NPPuerto Rico3954NPRico to3955TOto resolve3956VVresolve the3957DTthe fiscal3958JJfiscal crisis3959NNcrisis as3960INas it3961PPit had3962VHDhave with3963INwith the3964DTthe D3965NPD .3966SENT. C3967LSc .3968SENT. Control3969NPControl Board3970NPBoard 203971CD@card@ years3972NNSyear earlier3973RBRearlier .3974SENT. That3975DTthat 's3976VBZbe a3977DTa re3978NNre ...3979:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]3980LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] And3981CCand what3982WPwhat was3983VBDbe the3984DTthe position3985NNposition the3986DTthe government3987NNgovernment took3988VVDtake ,3989,, the3990DTthe D3991NPD .3992SENT. C3993LSc .3994SENT. Control3995NPControl Board3996NPBoard ?3997SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]3998LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So3999INso they4000PPthey point4001VVPpoint to4002TOto a4003DTa D4004NPD .4005SENT. C4006LSc .4007SENT. Circuit4008NNcircuit brief4009NNbrief in4010INin the4011DTthe second4012JJsecond set4013NNset of4014INof proceedings4015NNSproceeding .4016SENT. We4017PPwe said4018VVDsay in4019INin that4020DTthat brief4021NNbrief ,4022,, after4023INafter this4024DTthis Court4025NPCourt had4026VHDhave held4027VVNhold it4028PPit 's4029VBZbe exercising4030VVGexercise federal4031JJfederal power4032NNpower with4033INwith respect4034NNrespect to4035TOto federal4036JJfederal property4037NNproperty ,4038,, we4039PPwe said4040VVDsay ,4041,, sure4042RBsure ,4043,, it4044PPit 's4045VBZbe federal4046JJfederal ,4047,, but4048CCbut I4049PPI ...4050:... I4051PPI 'd4052MDwould urge4053VVurge the4054DTthe Court4055NPCourt to4056TOto look4057VVlook at4058INat the4059DTthe brief4060NNbrief .4061SENT. We4062PPwe said4063VVDsay if4064INif it4065PPit had4066VHDhave been4067VBNbe acting4068VVGact with4069INwith respect4070NNrespect to4071TOto D4072NPD .4073SENT. C4074LSc .4075SENT. ,4076,, it4077PPit would4078MDwould have4079VHhave been4080VBNbe different4081JJdifferent because4082INbecause that4083WDTthat would4084MDwould have4085VHhave been4086VBNbe local4087JJlocal power4088NNpower .4089SENT. I4090PPI think4091VVPthink the4092DTthe same4093JJsame is4094VBZbe true4095JJtrue with4096INwith respect4097NNrespect to4098TOto the4099DTthe territories4100NNSterritory .4101SENT. We4102PPwe drew4103VVDdraw a4104DTa distinction4105NNdistinction in4106INin that4107DTthat very4108RBvery brief4109JJbrief between4110INbetween federal4111JJfederal power4112NNpower over4113INover federal4114JJfederal property4115NNproperty and4116CCand local4117JJlocal power4118NNpower with4119INwith respect4120NNrespect to4121TOto the4122DTthe District4123NPDistrict or4124CCor ,4125,, here4126RBhere ,4127,, the4128DTthe territories4129NNSterritory .4130SENT. So4131RBso I4132PPI think4133VVPthink our4134PP$our position4135NNposition has4136VHZhave been4137VBNbe entirely4138RBentirely consistent4139JJconsistent .4140SENT. As4141RBas early4142RBearly as4143RBas ...4144:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]4145LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I4146PPI do4147VVPdo n't4148RBn't see4149VVsee how4150WRBhow .4151SENT. I4152PPI mean4153VVPmean ,4154,, you4155PPyou say4156VVPsay federal4157JJfederal power4158NNpower over4159INover federal4160JJfederal property4161NNproperty .4162SENT. But4163CCbut that4164DTthat 's4165VBZbe what4166WPwhat the4167DTthe Territory4168NPTerritory Clause4169NPClause ,4170,, read4171VVDread your4172PP$your way4173NNway ,4174,, would4175MDwould say4176VVsay ,4177,, that4178IN/thatthat Puerto4179NPPuerto Rico4180NPRico is4181VBZbe federal4182JJfederal property4183NNproperty .4184SENT. You4185PPyou can4186MDcan 't4187RB't have4188VHhave it4189PPit both4190DTboth ways4191NNSway .4192SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]4193LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So4194INso I4195PPI ...4196:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]4197LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Your4198PP$your ...4199:... you4200PPyou have4201VHPhave to4202TOto be4203VBbe disposing4204VVGdispose of4205INof federal4206JJfederal control4207NNcontrol over4208INover federal4209JJfederal property4210NNproperty ,4211,, because4212INbecause that4213WDTthat 's4214VBZbe what4215WPwhat a4216DTa territory4217NNterritory is4218VBZbe .4219SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]4220LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So4221INso I4222PPI ...4223:... I4224PPI do4225VVPdo n't4226RBn't think4227VVthink so4228RBso ,4229,, Justice4230NPJustice Sotomayor4231NPSotomayor ,4232,, but4233CCbut I4234PPI do4235VVPdo n't4236RBn't know4237VVknow that4238WDTthat much4239RBmuch turns4240VVZturn on4241RPon that4242IN/thatthat here4243RBhere .4244SENT. Article4245NPArticle IV4246NPIV says4247VVZsay both4248DTboth property4249NNproperty and4250CCand the4251DTthe territory4252NNterritory .4253SENT. And4254CCand this4255DTthis Court4256NPCourt 's4257POS's cases4258NNScase have4259VHPhave treated4260VVNtreat them4261PPthem differently4262RBdifferently .4263SENT. So4264RBso there4265RBthere it4266PPit was4267VBDbe Dulles4268NPDulles and4269CCand Reagan4270NPReagan National4271NPNational airports4272NNSairport .4273SENT. Those4274DTthose have4275VHPhave a4276DTa different4277JJdifferent status4278NNstatus under4279INunder the4280DTthe Constitution4281NPConstitution from4282INfrom the4283DTthe territories4284NNSterritory .4285SENT. But4286CCbut I4287PPI think4288VVPthink my4289PP$my point4290NNpoint was4291VBDbe just4292RBjust that4293IN/thatthat where4294WRBwhere Congress4295NPCongress is4296VBZbe acting4297VVGact with4298INwith respect4299NNrespect to4300TOto something4301NNsomething federal4302JJfederal ,4303,, it4304PPit 's4305VBZbe exercising4306VVGexercise national4307JJnational legislative4308JJlegislative power4309NNpower and4310CCand it4311PPit 's4312VBZbe creating4313VVGcreate national4314JJnational executive4315JJexecutive offices4316NNSoffice .4317SENT. That4318DTthat 's4319VBZbe not4320RBnot what4321WPwhat it4322PPit 's4323VBZbe doing4324VVGdo here4325RBhere .4326SENT. It4327PPit put4328VVDput a4329DTa Board4330NPBoard inside4331INinside the4332DTthe Puerto4333NPPuerto Rican4334JJRican government4335NNgovernment .4336SENT. Now4337RBnow ,4338,, yes4339UHyes ,4340,, it4341PPit wanted4342VVDwant it4343PPit independent4344JJindependent from4345INfrom other4346JJother Puerto4347NPPuerto Rican4348NPRican actors4349NNSactor that4350IN/thatthat it4351PPit thought4352VVDthink had4353VHDhave played4354VVNplay a4355DTa role4356NNrole in4357INin this4358DTthis debt4359NNdebt crisis4360NNcrisis .4361SENT. But4362CCbut that4363DTthat 's4364VBZbe a4365DTa very4366RBvery different4367JJdifferent thing4368NNthing from4369INfrom putting4370VVGput it4371PPit in4372INin the4373DTthe federal4374JJfederal government4375NNgovernment and4376CCand exercising4377VVGexercise federal4378JJfederal power4379NNpower .4380SENT. It4381PPit was4382VBDbe reorganizing4383VVGreorganize the4384DTthe Puerto4385NPPuerto Rican4386JJRican government4387NNgovernment .4388SENT. That4389DTthat is4390VBZbe a4391DTa quintessential4392JJquintessential exercise4393NNexercise of4394INof Article4395NPArticle IV4396NPIV power4397NNpower .4398SENT. And4399CCand I4400PPI do4401VVPdo n't4402RBn't think4403VVthink ,4404,, by4405INby the4406DTthe way4407NNway ,4408,, Justice4409NPJustice Kagan4410NPKagan and4411CCand Kavanaugh4412NPKavanaugh ,4413,, that4414IN/thatthat the4415DTthe history4416NNhistory is4417VBZbe a4418DTa wash4419NNwash .4420SENT. It4421PPit 's4422VBZbe not4423RBnot just4424RBjust the4425DTthe early4426JJearly Washington4427NPWashington mayors4428NNSmayor .4429SENT. Territorial4430JJterritorial judges4431NNSjudge were4432VBDbe federally4433RBfederally appointed4434VVNappoint ,4435,, never4436RBnever treated4437VVNtreat as4438INas federal4439JJfederal officers4440NNSofficer .4441SENT. Early4442JJearly territorial4443JJterritorial upper4444JJupper houses4445NNShouse ,4446,, the4447DTthe ...4448:... the4449DTthe D4450NPD .4451SENT. C4452LSc .4453SENT. Control4454NPControl Board4455NPBoard .4456SENT. D4457LSd .4458SENT. C4459LSc .4460SENT. judges4461NNSjudge ,4462,, to4463TOto this4464DTthis day4465NNday ,4466,, are4467VBPbe appointed4468VVNappoint by4469INby the4470DTthe President4471NPPresident and4472CCand confirmed4473VVDconfirm by4474INby the4475DTthe Senate4476NPSenate .4477SENT. They4478PPthey 've4479VHPhave never4480RBnever been4481VBNbe treated4482VVNtreat as4483INas federal4484JJfederal officers4485NNSofficer .4486SENT. They4487PPthey do4488VVPdo not4489RBnot have4490VHhave lifetime4491NNlifetime tenure4492NNtenure and4493CCand a4494DTa guaranteed4495VVNguarantee salary4496NNsalary .4497SENT. Federal4498JJFederal appointment4499NNappointment has4500VHZhave never4501RBnever been4502VBNbe the4503DTthe hallmark4504NNhallmark of4505INof whether4506INwhether you4507PPyou are4508VBPbe federal4509JJfederal or4510CCor territorial4511JJterritorial .4512SENT. The4513DTthe hallmark4514NNhallmark has4515VHZhave always4516RBalways been4517VBNbe ,4518,, as4519INas Mr4520NPMr .4521SENT. Verrilli4522NPVerrilli said4523VVDsay ,4524,, what4525WPwhat kind4526NNkind of4527INof power4528NNpower are4529VBPbe you4530PPyou exercising4531VVGexercise ?4532SENT? [JUSTICE BREYER]4533LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Well4534UHWell ,4535,, that4536WDTthat 's4537VBZbe a4538DTa question4539NNquestion I4540PPI ...4541:... I4542PPI mean4543VVPmean ,4544,, you4545PPyou 're4546VBPbe representing4547VVGrepresent the4548DTthe federal4549JJfederal government4550NNgovernment .4551SENT. If4552INif you4553PPyou lost4554VVDlose ,4555,, would4556MDwould they4557PPthey appoint4558VVappoint the4559DTthe same4560JJsame people4561NNSpeople ?4562SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]4563LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] The4564NPThe President4565NPPresident has4566VHZhave nominated4567VVNnominate the4568DTthe same4569JJsame people4570NNSpeople .4571SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]4572LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Okay4573NPOkay .4574SENT. Now4575RBnow ,4576,, if4577INif that4578WDTthat 's4579VBZbe so4580RBso and4581CCand if4582INif you4583PPyou lose4584VVPlose ,4585,, but4586CCbut if4587INif we4588PPwe were4589VBDbe to4590TOto follow4591VVfollow Judge4592NPJudge Terrea4593NPTerrea and4594CCand say4595VVsay the4596DTthe de4597FWde facto4598FWfacto officer4599NNofficer doctrine4600NNdoctrine ,4601,, what4602WPwhat difference4603NNdifference would4604MDwould it4605PPit make4606VVmake ?4607SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]4608LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So4609INso there4610EXthere are4611VBPbe two4612CDtwo separate4613JJseparate things4614NNSthing with4615INwith respect4616NNrespect to4617TOto the4618DTthe ...4619:... to4620TOto the4621DTthe remedy4622NNremedy ,4623,, Justice4624NPJustice Breyer4625NPBreyer .4626SENT. If4627INif the4628DTthe Court4629NPCourt agrees4630VVZagree with4631INwith us4632PPus on4633INon the4634DTthe de4635FWde facto4636FWfacto officer4637NNofficer doctrine4638NNdoctrine ,4639,, that4640WDTthat takes4641VVZtake care4642NNcare of4643INof the4644DTthe Board4645NPBoard 's4646POS's acts4647NNSact running4648VVGrun up4649RPup through4650INthrough the4651DTthe Court4652NPCourt 's4653POS's decision4654NNdecision .4655SENT. Going4656VVGgo forward4657RBforward ,4658,, I4659PPI think4660VVPthink all4661PDTall the4662DTthe parties4663NNSparty now4664RBnow agree4665VVPagree we4666PPwe still4667RBstill need4668VVPneed a4669DTa stay4670NNstay of4671INof the4672DTthe mandate4673NNmandate because4674INbecause you4675PPyou 'd4676MDwould have4677VHhave to4678TOto give4679VVgive Congress4680NPCongress the4681DTthe opportunity4682NNopportunity to4683TOto confirm4684VVconfirm a4685DTa new4686JJnew Board4687NPBoard .4688SENT. Otherwise4689RBotherwise ,4690,, the4691DTthe Board4692NPBoard would4693MDwould shut4694VVshut down4695RPdown over4696INover night4697NNnight .4698SENT. You4699PPyou would4700MDwould n't4701RBn't have4702VHhave a4703DTa Board4704NPBoard .4705SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]4706LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah4707NPYeah .4708SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]4709LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So4710INso you4711PPyou 've4712VHPhave got4713VVNget to4714TOto give4715VVgive the4716DTthe Senate4717NPSenate time4718NNtime to4719TOto act4720VVact .4721SENT. Right4722RBright ?4723SENT? And4724CCand then4725RBthen that4726IN/thatthat new4727JJnew Board4728NPBoard would4729MDwould pick4730VVpick up4731RPup where4732WRBwhere the4733DTthe old4734JJold Board4735NPBoard left4736VVDleave off4737RPoff .4738SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]4739LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But4740CCbut they4741PPthey would4742MDwould be4743VBbe the4744DTthe same4745JJsame people4746NNSpeople .4747SENT. And4748CCand so4749INso what4750WPwhat you4751PPyou 're4752VBPbe talking4753VVGtalk about4754RBabout is4755VBZbe a4756DTa delay4757NNdelay of4758INof possibly4759RBpossibly days4760NNSday while4761INwhile the4762DTthe Senate4763NPSenate gets4764VVZget its4765PP$its act4766NNact together4767RBtogether to4768TOto confirm4769VVconfirm the4770DTthe people4771NNSpeople that4772IN/thatthat they4773PPthey already4774RBalready recommended4775VVDrecommend to4776TOto the4777DTthe President4778NPPresident with4779INwith one4780CDone exception4781NNexception .4782SENT. I4783PPI mean4784VVPmean ,4785,, are4786VBPbe we4787PPwe talking4788VVGtalk ...4789:... is4790VBZbe that4791IN/thatthat what4792WPwhat we4793PPwe 're4794VBPbe talking4795VVGtalk about4796RBabout ?4797SENT? You4798PPyou win4799VVPwin ,4800,, and4801CCand there4802EXthere 's4803VBZbe no4804DTno delay4805NNdelay ;4806:; you4807PPyou lose4808VVPlose ,4809,, assuming4810VVGassume Judge4811NPJudge Terrea4812NPTerrea 's4813POS's right4814NNright ,4815,, and4816CCand there4817EXthere 's4818VBZbe a4819DTa slight4820JJslight delay4821NNdelay ?4822SENT? That4823DTthat 's4824VBZbe what4825WPwhat this4826DTthis case4827NNcase is4828VBZbe about4829RBabout ?4830SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]4831LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Well4832UHWell ,4833,, I4834PPI ...4835:... [JUSTICE BREYER]4836LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] On4837INon that4838DTthat assumption4839NNassumption ?4840SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]4841LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] I4842PPI hope4843VVPhope we4844PPwe 're4845VBPbe not4846RBnot in4847INin a4848DTa world4849NNworld where4850WRBwhere we4851PPwe lose4852VVPlose ,4853,, and4854CCand I4855PPI would4856MDwould love4857VVlove to4858TOto tell4859VVtell you4860PPyou that4861IN/thatthat it4862PPit won4863MDwill 't4864RB't be4865VBbe a4866DTa big4867JJbig deal4868NNdeal in4869INin that4870DTthat world4871NNworld ,4872,, but4873CCbut it4874PPit 's4875VBZbe going4876VVGgo to4877TOto be4878VBbe a4879DTa little4880RBlittle more4881RBRmore complicated4882VVNcomplicate that4883RBthat .4884SENT. They4885PPthey 're4886VBPbe almost4887RBalmost certain4888JJcertain to4889TOto argue4890VVargue that4891IN/thatthat the4892DTthe nominations4893NNSnomination have4894VHPhave expired4895VVNexpire and4896CCand that4897IN/thatthat even4898RBeven though4899INthough the4900DTthe Senate4901NPSenate has4902VHZhave confirmed4903VVNconfirm people4904NNSpeople before4905INbefore to4906TOto expired4907JJexpired terms4908NNSterm ,4909,, it4910PPit can4911MDcan 't4912RB't do4913VVPdo that4914IN/thatthat here4915RBhere .4916SENT. Even4917RBeven if4918INif we4919PPwe win4920VVPwin that4921IN/thatthat argument4922NNargument and4923CCand even4924RBeven if4925INif the4926DTthe Senate4927NPSenate committee4928NNcommittee reports4929VVZreport them4930PPthem out4931RPout and4932CCand even4933RBeven if4934INif the4935DTthe Senate4936NPSenate gets4937VVZget them4938PPthem through4939INthrough the4940DTthe floor4941NNfloor during4942INduring the4943DTthe period4944NNperiod of4945INof the4946DTthe stay4947NNstay and4948CCand we4949PPwe get4950VVPget a4951DTa new4952JJnew Board4953NPBoard ,4954,, then4955RBthen they4956PPthey 're4957VBPbe going4958VVGgo to4959TOto argue4960VVargue that4961IN/thatthat Board4962NPBoard has4963VHZhave to4964TOto ratify4965VVratify everything4966NNeverything that4967WDTthat was4968VBDbe done4969VVNdo during4970INduring the4971DTthe period4972NNperiod of4973INof the4974DTthe stay4975NNstay ,4976,, and4977CCand they4978PPthey 're4979VBPbe going4980VVGgo to4981TOto challenge4982VVchallenge that4983DTthat ratification4984NNratification ,4985,, and4986CCand ,4987,, of4988INof course4989NNcourse ,4990,, that4991DTthat ratification4992NNratification will4993MDwill extend4994VVextend backward4995RBbackward in4996INin time4997NNtime ,4998,, further4999RBRfurther and5000CCand further5001RBRfurther ,5002,, depending5003VVGdepend on5004INon what5005WPwhat you5006PPyou do5007VVPdo with5008INwith the5009DTthe de5010FWde facto5011FWfacto officer5012NNofficer doctrine5013NNdoctrine .5014SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5015LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] The5016NPThe ...5017:... the5018DTthe ...5019:... the5020DTthe big5021JJbig question5022NNquestion on5023INon ...5024:... [MR. WALL J.B.]5025LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So5026RBso ,5027,, I5028PPI mean5029VVPmean ,5030,, we5031PPwe 're5032VBPbe litigating5033VVGlitigate for5034INfor years5035NNSyear on5036INon that5037DTthat view5038NNview .5039SENT. It5040PPit 's5041VBZbe just5042RBjust a5043DTa question5044NNquestion of5045INof how5046WRBhow much5047JJmuch we5048PPwe 're5049VBPbe going5050VVGgo to5051TOto have5052VHhave to5053TOto litigate5054VVlitigate with5055INwith them5056PPthem if5057INif we5058PPwe ...5059:... if5060INif ...5061:... if5062INif the5063DTthe Court5064NPCourt decides5065VVZdecide we5066PPwe 're5067VBPbe wrong5068JJwrong on5069INon the5070DTthe merits5071NNSmerit .5072SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5073LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Mr5074NPMr ...5075:... .5076SENT. Mr5077NPMr .5078SENT. Wall5079NPWall ,5080,, do5081VVPdo you5082PPyou have5083VHPhave to5084TOto still5085RBstill litigate5086VVlitigate that5087IN/thatthat here5088RBhere ?5089SENT? You5090PPyou 're5091VBPbe making5092VVGmake an5093DTan assumption5094NNassumption that5095IN/thatthat the5096DTthe de5097FWde facto5098FWfacto doctrine5099NNdoctrine does5100VVZdo go5101VVgo as5102RBas far5103RBfar as5104INas you5105PPyou say5106VVPsay ,5107,, which5108WDTwhich is5109VBZbe to5110TOto deprive5111VVdeprive a5112DTa winning5113VVGwin party5114NNparty of5115INof no5116DTno remedy5117NNremedy whatsoever5118RBwhatsoever .5119SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]5120LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] That5121DTthat 's5122VBZbe not5123RBnot true5124JJtrue .5125SENT. They5126PPthey will5127MDwill get5128VVget prospective5129JJprospective remedy5130NNremedy as5131INas all5132DTall of5133INof the5134DTthe litigants5135NNSlitigant did5136VVDdo in5137INin the5138DTthe de5139FWde facto5140FWfacto officer5141NNofficer cases5142NNScase ,5143,, including5144VVGinclude Buckley5145NPBuckley .5146SENT. It5147PPit ...5148:... the5149DTthe second5150NNsecond this5151DTthis Court5152NPCourt 's5153POS's stay5154NNstay expires5155VVZexpire ,5156,, the5157DTthe Board5158NPBoard can5159MDcan no5160RBno longer5161RBRlonger act5162VVact with5163INwith respect5164NNrespect to5165TOto Aurelius5166NPAurelius ,5167,, Assured5168VVDassure ,5169,, UTIER5170NPUTIER ,5171,, or5172CCor anybody5173NNanybody else5174RBelse .5175SENT. What5176WPWhat the5177DTthe de5178FWde facto5179FWfacto officer5180NNofficer doctrine5181NNdoctrine says5182VVZsay is5183VBZbe ,5184,, even5185RBeven though5186INthough you5187PPyou get5188VVPget meaningful5189JJmeaningful prospective5190JJprospective relief5191NNrelief ,5192,, we5193PPwe do5194VVPdo n't5195RBn't invalidate5196VVinvalidate everything5197NNeverything done5198VVNdo moving5199VVGmove backward5200RBbackward in5201INin time5202NNtime that5203IN/thatthat the5204DTthe officers5205NNSofficer are5206VBPbe alleged5207VVNallege to5208TOto have5209VHhave done5210VVNdo while5211INwhile invalidly5212RBinvalidly appointed5213VVNappoint .5214SENT. And5215CCand so5216RBso ...5217:... and5218CCand I5219PPI think5220VVPthink that5221WDTthat 's5222VBZbe critical5223JJcritical here5224RBhere because5225INbecause the5226DTthe Board5227NPBoard 's5228VHZhave been5229VBNbe acting5230VVGact for5231INfor three5232CDthree years5233NNSyear .5234SENT. We5235PPwe have5236VHPhave ,5237,, you5238PPyou know5239VVPknow ,5240,, nearly5241RBnearly 1005242CD@card@ adversary5243NNadversary proceedings5244NNSproceeding ,5245,, hundreds5246NNShundred of5247INof thousands5248NNSthousand of5249INof claims5250NNSclaim ,5251,, hundreds5252NNShundred of5253INof millions5254NNSmillion of5255INof dollars5256NNSdollar collected5257VVNcollect or5258CCor paid5259VVNpay out5260RPout ,5261,, 125262CD@card@ billion5263CDbillion dollars5264NNSdollar in5265INin bonds5266NNSbond issued5267VVNissue in5268INin the5269DTthe COFINA5270NPCOFINA Title5271NPTitle III5272NPIII proceeding5273NNproceeding that5274WDTthat have5275VHPhave been5276VBNbe traded5277VVNtrade on5278INon the5279DTthe secondary5280JJsecondary ...5281:... on5282INon the5283DTthe market5284NNmarket something5285NNsomething like5286INlike 85,0005287CD@card@ times5288NNStime .5289SENT. I5290PPI mean5291VVPmean ,5292,, I5293PPI have5294VHPhave no5295DTno idea5296NNidea how5297WRBhow one5298PPone unwinds5299VVZunwind this5300DTthis ,5301,, and5302CCand I5303PPI do5304VVPdo n't5305RBn't think5306VVthink that5307DTthat ...5308:... that5309IN/thatthat Aurelius5310NPAurelius and5311CCand UTIER5312NPUTIER have5313VHPhave given5314VVNgive any5315DTany real5316JJreal way5317NNway to5318TOto do5319VVdo it5320PPit .5321SENT. And5322CCand that5323DTthat 's5324VBZbe exactly5325RBexactly what5326WPwhat the5327DTthe de5328FWde facto5329FWfacto officer5330NNofficer doctrine5331NNdoctrine is5332VBZbe for5333INfor .5334SENT. We5335PPwe do5336VVPdo n't5337RBn't wipe5338VVwipe everything5339NNeverything out5340RPout in5341INin the5342DTthe past5343NNpast .5344SENT. But5345CCbut I5346PPI do5347VVPdo want5348VVwant to5349TOto say5350VVsay that5351IN/thatthat I5352PPI do5353VVPdo n't5354RBn't think5355VVthink we5356PPwe get5357VVget to5358TOto that5359DTthat .5360SENT. I5361PPI do5362VVPdo n't5363RBn't think5364VVthink the5365DTthe merits5366NNSmerit here5367RBhere are5368VBPbe ...5369:... are5370VBPbe close5371JJclose .5372SENT. Congress5373NPCongress did5374VVDdo its5375PP$its homework5376NNhomework .5377SENT. It5378PPit invoked5379VVDinvoke Article5380NPArticle IV5381NPIV .5382SENT. It5383PPit told5384VVDtell us5385PPus where5386WRBwhere it5387PPit was5388VBDbe putting5389VVGput it5390PPit ...5391:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5392LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I5393PPI thought5394VVDthink your5395PP$your argument5396NNargument would5397MDwould be5398VBbe that5399IN/thatthat if5400INif you5401PPyou lost5402VVDlose ,5403,, there5404EXthere would5405MDwould also5406RBalso be5407VBbe a5408DTa lot5409NNlot of5410INof legal5411JJlegal ramifications5412NNSramification in5413INin terms5414NNSterm of5415INof calling5416VVGcall into5417INinto question5418NNquestion the5419DTthe status5420NNstatus of5421INof elected5422VVNelect governors5423NNSgovernor ,5424,, judges5425NNSjudge ,5426,, territorial5427JJterritorial judges5428NNSjudge ,5429,, and5430CCand the5431DTthe like5432INlike .5433SENT. Is5434VBZbe that5435IN/thatthat not5436RBnot the5437DTthe case5438NNcase ?5439SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]5440LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Well5441UHwell ,5442,, I5443PPI think5444VVPthink it5445PPit depends5446VVZdepend on5447INon which5448WDTwhich of5449INof their5450PP$their four5451CDfour or5452CCor maybe5453RBmaybe five5454CDfive tests5455NNStest you5456PPyou pick5457VVPpick .5458SENT. They5459PPthey start5460VVPstart with5461INwith Buckley5462NPBuckley .5463SENT. If5464INif they5465PPthey 're5466VBPbe serious5467JJserious about5468RBabout that5469IN/thatthat ,5470,, which5471WDTwhich has5472VHZhave significant5473JJsignificant authority5474NNauthority under5475INunder federal5476JJfederal law5477NNlaw ,5478,, that5479WDTthat 's5480VBZbe the5481DTthe D5482NND .5483SENT. C5484LSc .5485SENT. mayor5486NNmayor ,5487,, city5488NNcity council5489NNcouncil ,5490,, the5491DTthe Guam5492NPGuam and5493CCand Virgin5494NPVirgin Island5495NPIsland governors5496NNSgovernor ,5497,, and5498CCand all5499DTall territorial5500JJterritorial legislators5501NNSlegislator and5502CCand judges5503NNSjudge .5504SENT. All5505DTall of5506INof that5507DTthat authority5508NNauthority flows5509VVZflow directly5510RBdirectly from5511INfrom federal5512JJfederal law5513NNlaw ,5514,, whether5515INwhether an5516DTan organic5517JJorganic act5518NNact or5519CCor the5520DTthe D5521NPD .5522SENT. C5523LSc .5524SENT. Home5525NPHome Rule5526NPRule Act5527NPAct .5528SENT. So5529RBso then5530RBthen they5531PPthey tweak5532VVPtweak Buckley5533NPBuckley to5534TOto say5535VVsay :5536:: Well5537UHWell ,5538,, not5539RBnot if5540INif you5541PPyou 're5542VBPbe elected5543VVNelect .5544SENT. And5545CCand then5546RBthen I5547PPI say5548VVPsay :5549:: Well5550UHWell ,5551,, but5552CCbut you5553PPyou still5554RBstill do5555VVPdo n't5556RBn't solve5557VVsolve D5558NPD .5559SENT. C5560LSc .5561SENT. judges5562NNSjudge ,5563,, territorial5564JJterritorial judges5565NNSjudge ,5566,, Washington5567NPWashington mayors5568NNSmayor ,5569,, early5570JJearly territorial5571JJterritorial upper5572JJupper houses5573NNShouse ,5574,, or5575CCor the5576DTthe D5577NPD .5578SENT. C5579LSc .5580SENT. Control5581NPControl Board5582NPBoard .5583SENT. And5584CCand then5585RBthen they5586PPthey say5587VVPsay :5588:: Well5589UHWell ,5590,, it5591PPit 's5592VBZbe executing5593VVGexecute federal5594JJfederal law5595NNlaw ,5596,, maybe5597RBmaybe it5598PPit 's5599VBZbe a5600DTa special5601JJspecial law5602NNlaw ,5603,, maybe5604RBmaybe it5605PPit 's5606VBZbe federal5607JJfederal objectives5608NNSobjective ,5609,, maybe5610RBmaybe it5611PPit 's5612VBZbe federal5613JJfederal removal5614NNremoval and5615CCand there5616EXthere 's5617VBZbe a5618DTa hodgepodge5619NNhodgepodge of5620INof other5621JJother factors5622NNSfactor thrown5623VVNthrow in5624INin there5625RBthere .5626SENT. If5627INif the5628DTthe Court5629NPCourt accepts5630VVZaccept those5631DTthose ,5632,, notwithstanding5633INnotwithstanding that5634WDTthat there5635EXthere are5636VBPbe historical5637JJhistorical counter-examples5638NNScounter-examples to5639TOto every5640DTevery one5641CDone of5642INof those5643DTthose tests5644NNStest ,5645,, then5646RBthen I5647PPI suppose5648VVPsuppose you5649PPyou could5650MDcould try5651VVtry to5652TOto carve5653VVcarve out5654RPout the5655DTthe test5656NNtest in5657INin just5658RBjust the5659DTthe way5660NNway as5661RBas to5662TOto pick5663VVpick this5664DTthis up5665RBup .5666SENT. But5667CCbut I5668PPI do5669VVPdo n't5670RBn't think5671VVthink there5672EXthere 's5673VBZbe any5674DTany principled5675JJprincipled way5676NNway to5677TOto do5678VVdo it5679PPit .5680SENT. All5681DTall of5682INof the5683DTthe federal5684JJfederal authority5685NNauthority that5686IN/thatthat these5687DTthese territorial5688JJterritorial officers5689NNSofficer and5690CCand D5691NPD .5692SENT. C5693LSc .5694SENT. officers5695NNSofficer exercise5696VVPexercise flows5697NNSflow from5698INfrom federal5699JJfederal law5700NNlaw .5701SENT. And5702CCand if5703INif you5704PPyou take5705VVPtake their5706PP$their test5707NNtest seriously5708RBseriously ,5709,, yes5710UHyes ,5711,, Justice5712NPJustice Kavanaugh5713NPKavanaugh ,5714,, it5715PPit will5716MDwill threaten5717VVthreaten to5718TOto undermine5719VVundermine ,5720,, indeed5721RBindeed I5722PPI think5723VVPthink it5724PPit would5725MDwould condemn5726VVcondemn in5727INin its5728PP$its entirety5729NNentirety ,5730,, home5731NNhome rule5732NNrule .5733SENT. I5734PPI mean5735VVPmean ...5736:... and5737CCand ...5738:... and5739CCand that5740WDTthat just5741RBjust points5742VVZpoint out5743RPout ...5744:... I5745PPI mean5746VVPmean ,5747,, there5748EXthere 's5749VBZbe both5750CCboth an5751DTan upper-level5752JJupper-level and5753CCand a5754DTa lower-level5755JJlower-level disruption5756NNdisruption here5757RBhere .5758SENT. The5759DTthe lower-level5760JJlower-level disruption5761NNdisruption is5762VBZbe undoing5763VVGundo three5764CDthree years5765NNSyear of5766INof what5767WPwhat the5768DTthe Board5769NPBoard has5770VHZhave done5771VVNdo to5772TOto try5773VVtry to5774TOto stabilize5775VVstabilize the5776DTthe condition5777NNcondition in5778INin Puerto5779NPPuerto Rico5780NPRico .5781SENT. The5782DTthe upper-level5783JJupper-level disruption5784NNdisruption is5785VBZbe every5786DTevery test5787NNtest they5788PPthey 've5789VHPhave got5790VVNget runs5791VVZrun smack5792RBsmack dab5793VVdab into5794INinto history5795NNhistory ,5796,, and5797CCand every5798DTevery test5799NNtest they5800PPthey 've5801VHPhave got5802VVNget would5803MDwould federalize5804VVfederalize some5805DTsome number5806NNnumber of5807INof officers5808NNSofficer who5809WPwho have5810VHPhave always5811RBalways been5812VBNbe thought5813VVNthink of5814INof as5815RBas territorial5816JJterritorial or5817CCor local5818JJlocal ,5819,, whether5820INwhether in5821INin D5822NPD .5823SENT. C5824LSc .5825SENT. or5826CCor in5827INin the5828DTthe territories5829NNSterritory .5830SENT. And5831CCand like5832INlike I5833PPI say5834VVPsay ,5835,, I5836PPI mean5837VVPmean ,5838,, from5839INfrom 18025840CD@card@ to5841TOto now5842RBnow ,5843,, I5844PPI mean5845VVPmean ,5846,, if5847INif ...5848:... if5849INif ...5850:... if5851INif Mr5852NPMr .5853SENT. Olson5854NPOlson is5855VBZbe serious5856JJserious that5857IN/thatthat significant5858JJsignificant authority5859NNauthority under5860INunder federal5861JJfederal law5862NNlaw makes5863VVZmake you5864PPyou a5865DTa federal5866JJfederal officer5867NNofficer ,5868,, well5869RBwell ,5870,, then5871RBthen ,5872,, so5873RBso too5874RBtoo the5875DTthe D5876NPD .5877SENT. C5878LSc .5879SENT. judges5880NNSjudge who5881WPwho ...5882:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5883LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That5884DTthat 's5885VBZbe assuming5886VVGassume that5887IN/thatthat the5888DTthe immediate5889JJimmediate ...5890:... that5891IN/thatthat you5892PPyou 're5893VBPbe looking5894VVGlook at5895INat the5896DTthe ultimate5897JJultimate source5898NNsource ,5899,, which5900WDTwhich is5901VBZbe a5902DTa double5903JJdouble jeopardy5904NNjeopardy idea5905NNidea .5906SENT. And5907CCand our5908PP$our ...5909:... and5910CCand our5911PP$our opinion5912NNopinion in5913INin Sanchez5914NPSanchez Valle5915NPValle made5916VVDmake it5917PPit very5918RBvery clear5919JJclear that5920IN/thatthat it5921PPit was5922VBDbe limited5923VVNlimit to5924TOto that5925DTthat .5926SENT. A5927DTa much5928JJmuch different5929JJdifferent result5930NNresult if5931INif you5932PPyou limit5933VVPlimit it5934PPit to5935TOto what5936WPwhat 's5937VBZbe the5938DTthe immediate5939JJimmediate source5940NNsource .5941SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]5942LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Oh5943UHoh ,5944,, yes5945UHyes ,5946,, I5947PPI do5948VVPdo n't5949RBn't disagree5950VVdisagree that5951IN/thatthat that5952DTthat 's5953VBZbe kind5954NNkind of5955INof an5956DTan ...5957:... an5958DTan ad5959FWad hoc5960FWhoc limitation5961NNlimitation that5962IN/thatthat they5963PPthey 've5964VHPhave thrown5965VVNthrow on5966RPon to5967TOto try5968VVtry to5969TOto avoid5970VVavoid the5971DTthe consequences5972NNSconsequence of5973INof their5974PP$their view5975NNview .5976SENT. But5977CCbut just5978RBjust to5979TOto refine5980VVrefine what5981WPwhat you5982PPyou said5983VVDsay a5984DTa little5985JJlittle bit5986NNbit ,5987,, Justice5988NPJustice Sotomayor5989NPSotomayor ,5990,, what5991WDTwhat ...5992:... what5993WPwhat I5994PPI took5995VVDtake Justice5996NPJustice Kagan5997NPKagan 's5998POS's opinion5999NNopinion to6000TOto be6001VBbe saying6002VVGsay in6003INin Sanchez6004NPSanchez Valle6005NPValle is6006VBZbe ,6007,, look6008VVlook ,6009,, there6010EXthere are6011VBPbe other6012JJother ways6013NNSway you6014PPyou could6015MDcould have6016VHhave defined6017VVNdefine sovereignty6018NNsovereignty or6019CCor you6020PPyou could6021MDcould have6022VHhave looked6023VVNlook at6024INat sovereignty6025NNsovereignty ,6026,, but6027CCbut ,6028,, if6029INif we6030PPwe 're6031VBPbe looking6032VVGlook at6033INat source6034NNsource of6035INof authority6036NNauthority ,6037,, the6038DTthe source6039NNsource of6040INof authority6041NNauthority here6042RBhere flows6043VVZflow from6044INfrom federal6045JJfederal law6046NNlaw .6047SENT. Well6048UHwell ,6049,, their6050PP$their test6051NNtest is6052VBZbe a6053DTa source6054NNsource test6055NNtest .6056SENT. Their6057PP$their test6058NNtest is6059VBZbe Buckley6060NPBuckley .6061SENT. Did6062VVDdo you6063PPyou get6064VVget significant6065JJsignificant authority6066NNauthority from6067INfrom federal6068JJfederal law6069NNlaw ?6070SENT? So6071RBso maybe6072RBmaybe there6073EXthere are6074VBPbe other6075JJother tests6076NNStest they6077PPthey could6078MDcould have6079VHhave tried6080VVNtry to6081TOto come6082VVcome up6083RPup with6084INwith ,6085,, but6086CCbut theirs6087PPtheirs is6088VBZbe a6089DTa source6090NNsource test6091NNtest .6092SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6093LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But6094CCbut you6095PPyou could6096MDcould say6097VVsay that6098IN/thatthat about6099INabout the6100DTthe states6101NNSstate .6102SENT. The6103DTthe Constitution6104NPConstitution is6105VBZbe the6106DTthe source6107NNsource of6108INof their6109PP$their power6110NNpower because6111INbecause the6112DTthe compact6113NNcompact with6114INwith the6115DTthe United6116NPUnited States6117NPSStates ...6118:... with6119INwith ...6120:... their6121PP$their very6122JJvery existence6123NNexistence is6124VBZbe dependent6125JJdependent on6126INon that6127DTthat .6128SENT. But6129CCbut we6130PPwe do6131VVPdo n't6132RBn't define6133VVdefine what6134WPwhat a6135DTa state6136NNstate act6137NNact is6138VBZbe or6139CCor a6140DTa federal6141JJfederal act6142NNact by6143INby their6144PP$their original6145JJoriginal source6146NNsource .6147SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]6148LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Oh6149UHoh ,6150,, well6151UHwell ...6152:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6153LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] We6154PPwe define6155VVPdefine it6156PPit by6157INby who6158WPwho passed6159VVDpass the6160DTthe law6161NNlaw ,6162,, the6163DTthe state6164NNstate or6165CCor the6166DTthe federal6167JJfederal government6168NNgovernment .6169SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]6170LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Well6171UHWell ,6172,, except6173INexcept that6174DTthat under6175INunder their6176PP$their test6177NNtest ,6178,, and6179CCand I6180PPI think6181VVPthink under6182INunder Sanchez6183NPSanchez Valle6184NPValle ,6185,, you6186PPyou 've6187VHPhave got6188VVNget to6189TOto look6190VVlook at6191INat where6192WRBwhere that6193DTthat power6194NNpower flowed6195VVDflow from6196INfrom ,6197,, where6198WRBwhere did6199VVDdo you6200PPyou get6201VVget that6202DTthat authority6203NNauthority .6204SENT. And6205CCand they6206PPthey keep6207VVPkeep saying6208VVGsay authority6209NNauthority under6210INunder federal6211JJfederal law6212NNlaw .6213SENT. Okay6214RBokay ,6215,, well6216RBwell ,6217,, if6218INif that6219WDTthat 's6220VBZbe your6221PP$your test6222NNtest ,6223,, all6224RBall of6225INof that6226DTthat authority6227NNauthority ,6228,, whether6229INwhether with6230INwith respect6231NNrespect to6232TOto D6233NPD .6234SENT. C6235LSc .6236SENT. or6237CCor the6238DTthe territories6239NNSterritory ,6240,, flows6241NNSflow from6242INfrom federal6243JJfederal law6244NNlaw .6245SENT. And6246CCand ,6247,, of6248INof course6249NNcourse ,6250,, the6251DTthe problem6252NNproblem with6253INwith the6254DTthe test6255NNtest ,6256,, Justice6257NPJustice Sotomayor6258NPSotomayor ,6259,, is6260VBZbe Buckley6261NPBuckley is6262VBZbe a6263DTa significance6264NNsignificance test6265NNtest .6266SENT. It6267PPit takes6268VVZtake an6269DTan officer6270NNofficer who6271WPwho 's6272VBZbe got6273VVNget concededly6274RBconcededly federal6275JJfederal power6276NNpower and6277CCand says6278VVZsay how6279WRBhow significant6280JJsignificant is6281VBZbe their6282PP$their power6283NNpower ?6284SENT? Are6285VBPbe they6286PPthey an6287DTan employee6288NNemployee or6289CCor are6290VBPbe they6291PPthey an6292DTan officer6293NNofficer ?6294SENT? It6295PPit 's6296VBZbe not6297RBnot designed6298VVNdesign to6299TOto answer6300VVanswer the6301DTthe predicate6302JJpredicate question6303NNquestion of6304INof ,6305,, well6306RBwell ,6307,, are6308VBPbe they6309PPthey exercising6310VVGexercise federal6311JJfederal power6312NNpower or6313CCor territorial6314JJterritorial power6315NNpower ?6316SENT? That6317DTthat 's6318VBZbe the6319DTthe question6320NNquestion that6321IN/thatthat Palmore6322NPPalmore gets6323VVZget at6324INat .6325SENT. Is6326VBZbe it6327PPit a6328DTa D6329NPD .6330SENT. C6331LSc .6332SENT. court6333NNcourt or6334CCor is6335VBZbe it6336PPit an6337DTan Article6338NPArticle III6339NPIII court6340NNcourt ?6341SENT? And6342CCand the6343DTthe only6344JJonly way6345NNway you6346PPyou know6347VVPknow that6348WDTthat is6349VBZbe by6350INby asking6351VVGask two6352CDtwo questions6353NNSquestion :6354:: One6355CDOne ,6356,, did6357VVDdo Congress6358NPCongress invoke6359VVinvoke Article6360NNarticle I6361PPI or6362CCor did6363VVDdo it6364PPit invoke6365VVinvoke Article6366NPArticle IV6367NPIV ?6368SENT? And6369CCand then6370RBthen ,6371,, two6372CDtwo ...6373:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6374LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I6375PPI 've6376VHPhave not6377RBnot even6378RBeven ...6379:... [MR. WALL J.B.]6380LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] ...6381:... did6382VVDdo it6383PPit do6384VVPdo anything6385NNanything under6386INunder Article6387NPArticle I6388NPI or6389CCor Article6390NPArticle IV6391NPIV that6392WDTthat ...6393:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]6394LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Why6395WRBwhy do6396VVPdo you6397PPyou bother6398VVbother with6399INwith the6400DTthe third6401JJthird ?6402SENT? If6403INif you6404PPyou give6405VVPgive the6406DTthe first6407JJfirst ...6408:... assuming6409VVGassume that6410IN/thatthat ,6411,, as6412INas your6413PP$your adversary6414NNadversary said6415VVDsay ,6416,, if6417INif Congress6418NPCongress ...6419:... all6420RBall it6421PPit has6422VHZhave to6423TOto do6424VVdo is6425VBZbe wave6426VVwave a6427DTa magic6428JJmagic wand6429NNwand ,6430,, Article6431NPArticle IV6432NPIV ,6433,, and6434CCand that6435IN/thatthat that6436WDTthat gives6437VVZgive permission6438NNpermission ?6439SENT? Obviously6440RBobviously not6441RBnot .6442SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]6443LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Oh6444UHoh ,6445,, it6446PPit 's6447VBZbe still6448RBstill got6449VVNget to6450TOto be6451VBbe ...6452:... it6453PPit 's6454VBZbe got6455VVNget ...6456:... first6457RBfirst ,6458,, you6459PPyou 've6460VHPhave got6461VVNget to6462TOto ask6463VVask where6464WRBwhere it6465PPit was6466VBDbe trying6467VVGtry to6468TOto put6469VVput the6470DTthe office6471NNoffice .6472SENT. That6473DTthat 's6474VBZbe the6475DTthe first6476JJfirst step6477NNstep .6478SENT. And6479CCand then6480RBthen you6481PPyou 've6482VHPhave got6483VVNget to6484TOto ask6485VVask whether6486INwhether it6487PPit had6488VHDhave the6489DTthe constitutional6490JJconstitutional power6491NNpower to6492TOto do6493VVdo that6494DTthat thing6495NNthing .6496SENT. Did6497VVDdo it6498PPit do6499VVPdo something6500NNsomething under6501INunder Article6502NPArticle I6503NPI or6504CCor under6505INunder Article6506NPArticle IV6507NPIV that6508IN/thatthat it6509PPit could6510MDcould n't6511RBn't do6512VVdo ?6513SENT? And6514CCand the6515DTthe very6516RBvery first6517JJfirst sentence6518NNsentence of6519INof the6520DTthe court6521NNcourt of6522INof appeals6523NNSappeal discussion6524NNdiscussion is6525VBZbe no6526RBno one6527CDone here6528RBhere has6529VHZhave claimed6530VVNclaim that6531DTthat anything6532NNanything in6533INin PROMESA6534NPPROMESA extends6535VVZextend beyond6536INbeyond Congress6537NPCongress 's6538POS's reach6539NNreach under6540INunder Article6541NPArticle IV6542NPIV .6543SENT. And6544CCand that6545DTthat 's6546VBZbe true6547JJtrue .6548SENT. There6549EXthere 's6550VBZbe not6551RBnot a6552DTa word6553NNword in6554INin these6555DTthese briefs6556NNSbrief from6557INfrom Aurelius6558NPAurelius or6559CCor UTIER6560NPUTIER claiming6561VVGclaim that6562IN/thatthat there6563EXthere is6564VBZbe any6565DTany power6566NNpower vested6567VVNvest in6568INin the6569DTthe Board6570NPBoard that6571WDTthat is6572VBZbe not6573RBnot among6574INamong Congress6575NPCongress 's6576POS's plenary6577JJplenary power6578NNpower under6579INunder Article6580NPArticle IV6581NPIV .6582SENT. That6583DTthat 's6584VBZbe the6585DTthe end6586NNend of6587INof the6588DTthe analysis6589NNanalysis ,6590,, I6591PPI think6592VVPthink ,6593,, correctly6594RBcorrectly understood6595VVNunderstand .6596SENT. What6597WPWhat was6598VBDbe Congress6599NPCongress doing6600VVGdo ?6601SENT? It6602PPit was6603VBDbe putting6604VVGput it6605PPit in6606INin the6607DTthe territorial6608JJterritorial government6609NNgovernment .6610SENT. Did6611VVDdo it6612PPit give6613VVPgive it6614PPit any6615DTany power6616NNpower it6617PPit did6618VVDdo n't6619RBn't have6620VHhave under6621INunder Article6622NPArticle IV6623NPIV ?6624SENT? They6625PPthey have6626VHPhave n't6627RBn't claimed6628VVNclaim that6629IN/thatthat it6630PPit did6631VVDdo .6632SENT. That6633DTthat under6634INunder Palmore6635NPPalmore ,6636,, I6637PPI think6638VVPthink ,6639,, is6640VBZbe the6641DTthe end6642NNend of6643INof the6644DTthe analysis6645NNanalysis .6646SENT. Congress6647NPCongress invoked6648VVDinvoke its6649PP$its plenary6650JJplenary power6651NNpower .6652SENT. It6653PPit did6654VVDdo n't6655RBn't do6656VVdo anything6657NNanything Article6658NPArticle IV6659NPIV did6660VVDdo n't6661RBn't give6662VVgive it6663PPit the6664DTthe power6665NNpower to6666TOto do6667VVdo .6668SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]6669LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] And6670CCand ,6671,, Mr6672NPMr .6673SENT. Wall6674NPWall ,6675,, what6676WPwhat is6677VBZbe your6678PP$your answer6679NNanswer to6680TOto the6681DTthe question6682NNquestion that6683IN/thatthat Justice6684NPJustice Sotomayor6685NPSotomayor started6686VVDstart off6687RPoff with6688INwith about6689INabout the6690DTthe difference6691NNdifference between6692INbetween these6693DTthese Board6694NPBoard members6695NNSmember and6696CCand a6697DTa U6698NPU .6699SENT. S6700NPS .6701SENT. attorney6702NNattorney ?6703SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]6704LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] It6705PPit 's6706VBZbe the6707DTthe same6708JJsame one6709CDone that6710IN/thatthat Mr6711NPMr .6712SENT. Verrilli6713NPVerrilli gave6714VVDgive ,6715,, which6716WDTwhich is6717VBZbe where6718WRBwhere you6719PPyou have6720VHPhave executive6721JJexecutive officers6722NNSofficer who6723WPwho are6724VBPbe acting6725VVGact under6726INunder statutes6727NNSstatute of6728INof nationwide6729JJnationwide application6730NNapplication ,6731,, we6732PPwe think6733VVPthink that6734IN/thatthat that6735WDTthat 's6736VBZbe best6737RBSwell understood6738VVNunderstand to6739TOto be6740VBbe exercising6741VVGexercise federal6742JJfederal ...6743:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]6744LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] How6745WRBHow about6746RBabout ...6747:... [MR. WALL J.B.]6748LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] ...6749:... executive6750JJexecutive power6751NNpower .6752SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]6753LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...6754:... if6755INif PROMESA6756NPPROMESA had6757VHDhave ,6758,, instead6759RBinstead of6760INof setting6761VVGset it6762PPit up6763RPup the6764DTthe way6765NNway it6766PPit did6767VVDdo ,6768,, had6769VHDhave just6770RBjust ...6771:... had6772VHDhave amended6773VVNamend Chapter6774NPChapter 96775CD9 of6776INof the6777DTthe federal6778JJfederal bankruptcy6779NNbankruptcy laws6780NNSlaw and6781CCand said6782VVDsay Puerto6783NPPuerto Rico6784NPRico instrumentalities6785NNSinstrumentality get6786VVPget to6787TOto use6788VVuse Chapter6789NPChapter 96790CD9 the6791DTthe way6792NNway everybody6793NNeverybody else6794RBelse does6795VVZdo ,6796,, then6797RBthen creates6798VVZcreate the6799DTthe Board6800NPBoard to6801TOto do6802VVdo that6803DTthat .6804SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]6805LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Yeah6806NPYeah ,6807,, I6808PPI ...6809:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]6810LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] What6811WPWhat ...6812:... what6813WPwhat of6814INof that6815DTthat ?6816SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]6817LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] I6818PPI ...6819:... I6820PPI do6821VVPdo n't6822RBn't think6823VVthink the6824DTthe form6825NNform of6826INof that6827DTthat matters6828NNSmatter .6829SENT. You6830PPyou 're6831VBPbe asking6832VVGask the6833DTthe same6834JJsame two6835CDtwo questions6836NNSquestion .6837SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]6838LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Because6839INbecause there6840RBthere ,6841,, there6842EXthere is6843VBZbe a6844DTa ...6845:... I6846PPI ...6847:... I6848PPI guess6849VVPguess what6850WPwhat I6851PPI was6852VBDbe suggesting6853VVGsuggest was6854VBDbe that6855IN/thatthat on6856INon ...6857:... on6858INon that6859WDTthat there6860EXthere would6861MDwould be6862VBbe a6863DTa uniform6864JJuniform national6865JJnational law6866NNlaw .6867SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]6868LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Oh6869UHoh ,6870,, I6871PPI ...6872:... I6873PPI think6874VVPthink you6875PPyou 'd6876MDwould have6877VHhave to6878TOto ask6879VVask the6880DTthe same6881JJsame two6882CDtwo questions6883NNSquestion .6884SENT. Was6885VBDbe Congress6886NPCongress doing6887VVGdo that6888IN/thatthat under6889INunder the6890DTthe bankruptcy6891NNbankruptcy clause6892NNclause in6893INin Article6894NPArticle I6895NPI or6896CCor doing6897VVGdo it6898PPit under6899INunder the6900DTthe Territory6901NPTerritory Clause6902NNclause in6903INin Article6904NPArticle IV6905NPIV to6906TOto just6907RBjust create6908VVcreate or6909CCor extend6910VVextend those6911DTthose laws6912NNSlaw to6913TOto the6914DTthe territory6915NNterritory ?6916SENT? And6917CCand then6918RBthen did6919VVDdo it6920PPit do6921VVPdo ...6922:... did6923VVDdo it6924PPit put6925VVDput any6926DTany powers6927NNSpower in6928INin that6929DTthat office6930NNoffice that6931IN/thatthat it6932PPit could6933MDcould n't6934RBn't have6935VHhave under6936INunder Article6937NPArticle IV6938NPIV .6939SENT. So6940RBso I6941PPI think6942VVPthink it6943PPit 'd6944MDwould be6945VBbe the6946DTthe same6947JJsame answer6948NNanswer if6949INif ,6950,, when6951WRBwhen extending6952VVGextend the6953DTthe bankruptcy6954NNbankruptcy statute6955NNstatute ,6956,, it6957PPit had6958VHDhave said6959VVNsay we6960PPwe 're6961VBPbe extending6962VVGextend a6963DTa similar6964JJsimilar system6965NNsystem to6966TOto Puerto6967NPPuerto Rico6968NPRico .6969SENT. We6970PPwe 're6971VBPbe invoking6972VVGinvoke Article6973NPArticle IV6974NPIV .6975SENT. We6976PPwe are6977VBPbe creating6978VVGcreate this6979DTthis new6980JJnew board6981NNboard to6982TOto oversee6983VVoversee these6984DTthese new6985JJnew bankruptcy6986NNbankruptcy proceedings6987NNSproceeding .6988SENT. And6989CCand we6990PPwe are6991VBPbe putting6992VVGput that6993IN/thatthat in6994INin the6995DTthe Puerto6996NPPuerto Rican6997JJRican government6998NNgovernment .6999SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7000LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Well7001UHWell ,7002,, then7003RBthen it7004PPit does7005VVZdo n't7006RBn't seem7007VVseem to7008TOto have7009VHhave much7010JJmuch to7011TOto do7012VVdo with7013INwith whether7014INwhether the7015DTthe law7016NNlaw is7017VBZbe nationwide7018JJnationwide or7019CCor not7020RBnot ,7021,, because7022INbecause my7023PP$my hypothetical7024JJhypothetical was7025VBDbe nationwide7026JJnationwide law7027NNlaw ,7028,, and7029CCand you7030PPyou 're7031VBPbe saying7032VVGsay it7033PPit would7034MDwould n't7035RBn't matter7036VVmatter because7037INbecause Congress7038NPCongress said7039VVDsay it7040PPit was7041VBDbe using7042VVGuse Article7043NPArticle IV7044NPIV .7045SENT. But7046CCbut it7047PPit 's7048VBZbe got7049VVNget to7050TOto be7051VBbe more7052JJRmore than7053INthan ...7054:... [MR. WALL J.B.]7055LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] So7056RBso ...7057:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]7058LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...7059:... what7060WPwhat Congress7061NPCongress said7062VVDsay ,7063,, right7064RBright ?7065SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]7066LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] ...7067:... so7068INso I7069PPI ...7070:... I7071PPI think7072VVPthink that7073WDTthat is7074VBZbe pressing7075VVGpress at7076INat exactly7077RBexactly the7078DTthe tough7079JJtough question7080NNquestion ,7081,, which7082WDTwhich I7083PPI 'm7084VBPbe going7085VVGgo to7086TOto say7087VVsay fortunately7088RBfortunately is7089VBZbe not7090RBnot presented7091VVNpresent here7092RBhere ,7093,, because7094INbecause it7095PPit 's7096VBZbe a7097DTa territory-specific7098JJterritory-specific statute7099NNstatute and7100CCand it7101PPit 's7102VBZbe only7103RBonly acting7104VVGact in7105INin the7106DTthe territory7107NNterritory .7108SENT. But7109CCbut Palmore7110NPPalmore does7111VVZdo say7112VVsay primarily7113RBprimarily local7114JJlocal .7115SENT. And7116CCand it7117PPit 's7118VBZbe a7119DTa little7120RBlittle tough7121JJtough to7122TOto figure7123VVfigure out7124RPout exactly7125RBexactly what7126WPwhat it7127PPit means7128VVZmean .7129SENT. It7130PPit seems7131VVZseem to7132TOto think7133VVthink that7134IN/thatthat ,7135,, if7136INif you7137PPyou 're7138VBPbe doing7139VVGdo the7140DTthe D7141NPD .7142SENT. C7143LSc .7144SENT. code7145VVcode most7146JJSmost of7147INof the7148DTthe time7149NNtime ,7150,, rather7151RBrather than7152INthan federal7153JJfederal statutes7154NNSstatute most7155JJSmost of7156INof the7157DTthe time7158NNtime ,7159,, adjudicating7160VVGadjudicate ,7161,, you7162PPyou 're7163VBPbe local7164JJlocal ,7165,, which7166WDTwhich seems7167VVZseem to7168TOto point7169VVpoint up7170RPup that7171IN/thatthat you7172PPyou can7173MDcan do7174VVdo a7175DTa little7176JJlittle bit7177NNbit of7178INof the7179DTthe nationwide7180JJnationwide thing7181NNthing without7182INwithout converting7183VVGconvert into7184INinto a7185DTa federal7186JJfederal officer7187NNofficer .7188SENT. And7189CCand we7190PPwe know7191VVPknow that7192WDTthat 's7193VBZbe true7194JJtrue of7195INof territorial7196JJterritorial judges7197NNSjudge .7198SENT. That7199DTthat 's7200VBZbe the7201DTthe best7202RBSwell historical7203JJhistorical example7204NNexample .7205SENT. They7206PPthey were7207VBDbe hearing7208VVGhear matters7209NNSmatter in7210INin the7211DTthe territory7212NNterritory ,7213,, but7214CCbut they7215PPthey were7216VBDbe adjudicating7217VVGadjudicate them7218PPthem under7219INunder federal7220JJfederal law7221NNlaw .7222SENT. So7223RBso I7224PPI think7225VVPthink that7226IN/thatthat you7227PPyou 're7228VBPbe asking7229VVGask a7230DTa really7231RBreally tough7232JJtough question7233NNquestion about7234RBabout ,7235,, well7236RBwell ,7237,, what7238WPwhat does7239VVZdo local7240JJlocal mean7241NNmean ?7242SENT? Does7243VVZdo it7244PPit mean7245VVPmean you7246PPyou 're7247VBPbe doing7248VVGdo only7249RBonly the7250DTthe local7251JJlocal matters7252NNSmatter ,7253,, or7254CCor does7255VVZdo it7256PPit go7257VVgo to7258TOto the7259DTthe geographic7260JJgeographic scope7261NNscope of7262INof the7263DTthe statute7264NNstatute under7265INunder which7266WDTwhich you7267PPyou act7268VVPact ?7269SENT? I7270PPI think7271VVPthink it7272PPit 's7273VBZbe tough7274JJtough .7275SENT. Palmore7276NPPalmore seems7277VVZseem to7278TOto indicate7279VVindicate the7280DTthe scope7281NNscope of7282INof the7283DTthe statute7284NNstatute might7285MDmight matter7286VVmatter .7287SENT. History7288NNhistory seems7289VVZseem to7290TOto indicate7291VVindicate it7292PPit might7293MDmight not7294RBnot if7295INif what7296WPwhat you7297PPyou 're7298VBPbe doing7299VVGdo is7300VBZbe local7301JJlocal .7302SENT. And7303CCand ,7304,, again7305RBagain ,7306,, all7307RBall I7308PPI can7309MDcan say7310VVsay is7311VBZbe I7312PPI think7313VVPthink this7314DTthis is7315VBZbe the7316DTthe easy7317JJeasy case7318NNcase because7319INbecause here7320RBhere we7321PPwe ...7322:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]7323LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Although7324INalthough this7325DTthis case7326NNcase ...7327:... [MR. WALL J.B.]7328LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] ...7329:... check7330VVcheck both7331DTboth boxes7332NNSbox .7333SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7334LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...7335:... is7336VBZbe n't7337RBn't all7338PDTall that7339DTthat different7340JJdifferent from7341INfrom my7342PP$my hypothetical7343JJhypothetical ,7344,, right7345RBright ,7346,, because7347INbecause essentially7348RBessentially what7349WPwhat PROMESA7350NPPROMESA does7351VVZdo is7352VBZbe it7353PPit replicates7354VVZreplicate all7355PDTall the7356DTthe procedures7357NNSprocedure of7358INof Chapter7359NPChapter 97360CD9 .7361SENT. I7362PPI mean7363VVPmean ,7364,, it7365PPit 's7366VBZbe not7367RBnot coming7368VVGcome up7369RPup with7370INwith a7371DTa new7372JJnew thing7373NNthing .7374SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]7375LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] I7376PPI mean7377VVPmean ,7378,, it7379PPit ...7380:... it7381PPit 's7382VBZbe similar7383JJsimilar in7384INin most7385JJSmost respects7386NNSrespect ,7387,, but7388CCbut I7389PPI actually7390RBactually do7391VVPdo n't7392RBn't think7393VVthink that7394IN/thatthat changes7395NNSchange the7396DTthe analysis7397NNanalysis .7398SENT. I7399PPI mean7400VVPmean ,7401,, when7402WRBwhen the7403DTthe Detroit7404NPDetroit mayor7405NNmayor walks7406VVZwalk in7407INin under7408INunder Chapter7409NPChapter 97410CD9 and7411CCand files7412NNSfile for7413INfor municipal7414JJmunicipal bankruptcy7415NNbankruptcy ,7416,, we7417PPwe do7418VVPdo n't7419RBn't think7420VVthink that7421IN/thatthat simply7422RBsimply because7423INbecause he7424PPhe has7425VHZhave invoked7426VVNinvoke some7427DTsome power7428NNpower granted7429VVNgrant to7430TOto him7431PPhim by7432INby federal7433JJfederal law7434NNlaw that7435IN/thatthat he7436PPhe becomes7437VVZbecome a7438DTa federal7439JJfederal officer7440NNofficer .7441SENT. I7442PPI mean7443VVPmean ,7444,, here7445RBhere ,7446,, the7447DTthe Board7448NPBoard basically7449RBbasically represents7450VVZrepresent the7451DTthe Commonwealth7452NPCommonwealth .7453SENT. It7454PPit 's7455VBZbe almost7456RBalmost like7457INlike the7458DTthe debtor7459NNdebtor .7460SENT. All7461RBall it7462PPit does7463VVZdo is7464VBZbe ,7465,, if7466INif the7467DTthe Commonwealth7468NPCommonwealth says7469VVZsay restructure7470VVrestructure our7471PP$our debt7472NNdebt ,7473,, it7474PPit walks7475VVZwalk in7476INin and7477CCand files7478VVZfile the7479DTthe petition7480NNpetition in7481INin federal7482JJfederal court7483NNcourt .7484SENT. It7485PPit then7486RBthen basically7487RBbasically represents7488VVZrepresent the7489DTthe debtor7490NNdebtor ,7491,, not7492RBnot different7493JJdifferent from7494INfrom any7495DTany other7496JJother state7497NNstate or7498CCor municipality7499NNmunicipality ,7500,, tries7501VVZtry to7502TOto work7503VVwork out7504RPout the7505DTthe claims7506NNSclaim with7507INwith the7508DTthe creditor7509NNcreditor ,7510,, and7511CCand then7512RBthen ultimately7513RBultimately Judge7514NPJudge Swain7515NPSwain has7516VHZhave to7517TOto sort7518VVsort out7519RPout the7520DTthe plan7521NNplan and7522CCand confirm7523VVconfirm something7524NNsomething in7525INin the7526DTthe bankruptcy7527NNbankruptcy .7528SENT. So7529RBso I7530PPI do7531VVPdo n't7532RBn't think7533VVthink in7534INin that7535DTthat respect7536NNrespect it7537PPit 's7538VBZbe acting7539VVGact any7540RBany differently7541RBdifferently from7542INfrom any7543DTany state7544NNstate or7545CCor locality7546NNlocality that7547WDTthat declares7548VVZdeclare under7549INunder Chapter7550NPChapter 97551CD9 .7552SENT. It7553PPit 's7554VBZbe still7555RBstill ...7556:... under7557INunder Palmore7558NPPalmore ,7559,, it7560PPit 's7561VBZbe still7562RBstill focused7563VVNfocus on7564INon local7565JJlocal matters7566NNSmatter .7567SENT. Everything7568NNEverything the7569DTthe Board7570NPBoard is7571VBZbe doing7572VVGdo ,7573,, it7574PPit 's7575VBZbe doing7576VVGdo in7577INin Puerto7578NPPuerto Rico7579NPRico ,7580,, which7581WDTwhich is7582VBZbe why7583WRBwhy I7584PPI do7585VVPdo n't7586RBn't think7587VVthink they7588PPthey 've7589VHPhave tried7590VVNtry to7591TOto claim7592VVclaim ,7593,, look7594VVlook ,7595,, you7596PPyou needed7597VVDneed any7598DTany Article7599NPArticle I7600NNI power7601NNpower .7602SENT. All7603RBall you7604PPyou needed7605VVDneed was7606VBDbe Article7607NPArticle IV7608NPIV .7609SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7610LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Suppose7611VVPsuppose Congress7612NPCongress invokes7613VVZinvoke Article7614NPArticle IV7615NPIV and7616CCand puts7617VVZput it7618PPit in7619INin the7620DTthe territorial7621JJterritorial government7622NNgovernment ,7623,, as7624INas it7625PPit 's7626VBZbe done7627VVNdo here7628RBhere ,7629,, but7630CCbut assigns7631VVZassign some7632DTsome matters7633NNSmatter that7634RBthat ...7635:... to7636TOto pick7637VVpick up7638RPup on7639INon Justice7640NPJustice Kagan7641NPKagan 's7642POS's questions7643NNSquestion ...7644:... are7645VBPbe more7646RBRmore national7647JJnational than7648INthan local7649JJlocal .7650SENT. Is7651VBZbe the7652DTthe remedy7653NNremedy for7654INfor that7655DTthat problem7656NNproblem to7657TOto say7658VVsay that7659IN/thatthat that7660DTthat officer7661NNofficer can7662MDcan 't7663RB't perform7664VVperform the7665DTthe more7666RBRmore national7667JJnational duties7668NNSduty ,7669,, or7670CCor is7671VBZbe the7672DTthe remedy7673NNremedy for7674INfor that7675WDTthat to7676TOto say7677VVsay that7678IN/thatthat the7679DTthe ...7680:... the7681DTthe office7682NNoffice is7683VBZbe invalid7684JJinvalid because7685INbecause it7686PPit 's7687VBZbe appointed7688VVNappoint in7689INin violation7690NNviolation of7691INof the7692DTthe Appointments7693NNSappointment Clause7694NNclause ?7695SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]7696LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Well7697UHWell ,7698,, first7699RBfirst ,7700,, Justice7701NPJustice Kavanaugh7702NPKavanaugh ,7703,, I7704PPI do7705VVPdo n't7706RBn't want7707VVwant to7708TOto ...7709:... to7710TOto grant7711VVgrant that7712IN/thatthat that7713DTthat office7714NNoffice would7715MDwould be7716VBbe unconstitutional7717JJunconstitutional .7718SENT. It7719PPit 's7720VBZbe pressing7721VVGpress .7722SENT. It7723PPit 's7724VBZbe a7725DTa tough7726JJtough question7727NNquestion Justice7728NPJustice Kagan7729NPKagan was7730VBDbe getting7731VVGget at7732INat .7733SENT. So7734RBso what7735WPwhat does7736VVZdo Palmore7737NPPalmore mean7738VVmean by7739INby primarily7740RBprimarily ?7741SENT? It7742PPit seems7743VVZseem to7744TOto leave7745VVleave some7746DTsome room7747NNroom to7748TOto do7749VVdo nationwide7750JJnationwide or7751CCor federal7752JJfederal things7753NNSthing as7754RBas long7755RBlong as7756INas you7757PPyou are7758VBPbe focused7759VVNfocus on7760INon the7761DTthe territory7762NNterritory .7763SENT. But7764CCbut if7765INif you7766PPyou assume7767VVPassume that7768IN/thatthat it7769PPit 's7770VBZbe got7771VVNget to7772TOto be7773VBbe exclusive7774JJexclusive ...7775:... a7776DTa test7777NNtest that7778IN/thatthat I7779PPI think7780VVPthink we7781PPwe meet7782VVPmeet here7783RBhere ...7784:... I7785PPI think7786VVPthink it7787PPit 's7788VBZbe a7789DTa hard7790JJhard question7791NNquestion what7792WPwhat the7793DTthe remedy7794NNremedy would7795MDwould be7796VBbe .7797SENT. I7798PPI think7799VVPthink you7800PPyou 'd7801MDwould still7802RBstill have7803VHhave the7804DTthe de7805FWde facto7806FWfacto officer7807NNofficer potentially7808RBpotentially going7809VVGgo ...7810:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7811LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well7812UHwell ,7813,, I7814PPI 'm7815VBPbe asking7816VVGask a7817DTa ...7818:... [MR. WALL J.B.]7819LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] ...7820:... outside7821NNoutside ...7822:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7823LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...7824:... different7825JJdifferent question7826NNquestion .7827SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]7828LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] ...7829:... unless7830INunless it7831PPit 's7832VBZbe an7833DTan adjudicator7834NNadjudicator .7835SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7836LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Wouldn't7837NPWouldn't ...7838:... would7839MDwould n't7840RBn't the7841DTthe officer7842NNofficer still7843RBstill be7844VBbe a7845DTa valid7846JJvalid territorial7847JJterritorial officer7848NNofficer but7849CCbut perhaps7850RBperhaps exercising7851VVGexercise some7852DTsome duties7853NNSduty that7854IN/thatthat he7855PPhe or7856CCor she7857PPshe cannot7858MDcan exercise7859VVexercise ?7860SENT? [MR. WALL J.B.]7861LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] I7862PPI think7863VVPthink that7864DTthat 's7865VBZbe a7866DTa potential7867JJpotential remedy7868NNremedy .7869SENT. We7870PPwe have7871VHPhave n't7872RBn't looked7873VVNlook at7874INat that7875DTthat here7876RBhere .7877SENT. We7878PPwe have7879VHPhave n't7880RBn't briefed7881VVNbrief it7882PPit .7883SENT. I7884PPI do7885VVPdo think7886VVthink that7887IN/thatthat it7888PPit kind7889RBkind of7890INof ...7891:... it7892PPit highlights7893VVZhighlight the7894DTthe oddity7895NNoddity of7896INof the7897DTthe other7898JJother side7899NNside 's7900POS's claim7901NNclaim .7902SENT. It7903PPit 's7904VBZbe not7905RBnot as7906RBas if7907INif they7908PPthey 're7909VBPbe pointing7910VVGpoint to7911TOto some7912DTsome federal7913JJfederal power7914NNpower provision7915NNprovision that7916WDTthat ...7917:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7918LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well7919UHwell ,7920,, I7921PPI think7922VVPthink it7923PPit highlights7924VVZhighlight the7925DTthe difficulty7926NNdifficulty ,7927,, as7928INas Justice7929NPJustice Kagan7930NPKagan said7931VVDsay ,7932,, at7933INat the7934DTthe primarily7935RBprimarily local7936JJlocal ,7937,, because7938INbecause the7939DTthe word7940NNword "7941``" primarily7942RBprimarily ,7943,, "7944``" you7945PPyou were7946VBDbe very7947RBvery careful7948JJcareful in7949INin your7950PP$your brief7951NNbrief to7952TOto have7953VHhave that7954DTthat each7955DTeach time7956NNtime you7957PPyou articulate7958VVParticulate the7959DTthe test7960NNtest .7961SENT. And7962CCand I7963PPI 'm7964VBPbe not7965RBnot sure7966JJsure how7967WRBhow we7968PPwe 're7969VBPbe supposed7970VVNsuppose to7971TOto figure7972VVfigure that7973IN/thatthat out7974RBout .7975SENT. [MR. WALL J.B.]7976LOC[MR. WALL J.B.] Justice7977NPJustice Kavanaugh7978NPKavanaugh ,7979,, I7980PPI think7981VVPthink you7982PPyou need7983VVPneed it7984PPit there7985RBthere .7986SENT. We7987PPwe 've7988VHPhave known7989VVNknow since7990INsince Cantor7991NPCantor in7992INin that7993DTthat territorial7994JJterritorial judges7995NNSjudge are7996VBPbe not7997RBnot federal7998JJfederal officers7999NNSofficer .8000SENT. And8001CCand yet8002RByet they8003PPthey are8004VBPbe adjudicating8005VVGadjudicate cases8006NNScase under8007INunder federal8008JJfederal law8009NNlaw .8010SENT. They8011PPthey had8012VHDhave general8013JJgeneral federal8014JJfederal jurisdiction8015NNjurisdiction ,8016,, just8017RBjust like8018INlike state8019NNstate courts8020NNScourt .8021SENT. It8022PPit ...8023:... it8024PPit was8025VBDbe exclusive8026JJexclusive until8027INuntil 18758028CD@card@ .8029SENT. So8030RBso I8031PPI think8032VVPthink you8033PPyou 've8034VHPhave got8035VVNget to8036TOto have8037VHhave some8038DTsome primary8039JJprimary test8040NNtest in8041INin there8042RBthere .8043SENT. I8044PPI think8045VVPthink you8046PPyou 're8047VBPbe going8048VVGgo to8049TOto have8050VHhave difficult8051JJdifficult cases8052NNScase at8053INat the8054DTthe margins8055NNSmargin .8056SENT. And8057CCand all8058RBall I8059PPI can8060MDcan fall8061VVfall back8062RBback on8063INon is8064VBZbe this8065DTthis is8066VBZbe not8067RBnot a8068DTa difficult8069JJdifficult case8070NNcase because8071INbecause ,8072,, here8073RBhere ,8074,, there8075EXthere 's8076VBZbe nothing8077NNnothing in8078INin PROMESA8079NPPROMESA that8080WDTthat needed8081VVDneed to8082TOto be8083VBbe an8084DTan exercise8085NNexercise of8086INof Article8087NPArticle I8088PPI .8089SENT. By8090INby its8091PP$its terms8092NNSterm ,8093,, it8094PPit is8095VBZbe limited8096VVNlimit to8097TOto the8098DTthe territory8099NNterritory .8100SENT. It8101PPit 's8102VBZbe not8103RBnot as8104RBas if8105INif they8106PPthey can8107MDcan point8108VVpoint you8109PPyou to8110TOto some8111DTsome federal8112JJfederal provisions8113NNSprovision of8114INof PROMESA8115NPPROMESA that8116WDTthat grant8117VVPgrant the8118DTthe federal8119JJfederal power8120NNpower that8121IN/thatthat you8122PPyou could8123MDcould just8124RBjust excise8125VVexcise .8126SENT. It8127PPit says8128VVZsay represent8129VVrepresent the8130DTthe Commonwealth8131NNcommonwealth in8132INin the8133DTthe following8134VVGfollow ways8135NNSway .8136SENT. And8137CCand ...8138:... and8139CCand I8140PPI do8141VVPdo ...8142:... I8143PPI do8144VVPdo ...8145:... and8146CCand I8147PPI think8148VVPthink this8149DTthis is8150VBZbe the8151DTthe best8152JJSgood way8153NNway to8154TOto capture8155VVcapture it8156PPit .8157SENT. Congress8158NPCongress could8159MDcould have8160VHhave given8161VVNgive these8162DTthese powers8163NNSpower to8164TOto the8165DTthe governor8166NNgovernor and8167CCand the8168DTthe legislature8169NNlegislature .8170SENT. They8171PPthey 'd8172MDwould already8173RBalready ...8174:... they8175PPthey already8176RBalready had8177VHDhave many8178JJmany of8179INof them8180PPthem .8181SENT. They8182PPthey could8183MDcould adjust8184VVadjust debt8185NNdebt .8186SENT. They8187PPthey could8188MDcould propose8189VVpropose budgets8190NNSbudget and8191CCand fiscal8192JJfiscal plans8193NNSplan .8194SENT. The8195DTthe governor8196NNgovernor otherwise8197RBotherwise would8198MDwould have8199VHhave represented8200VVNrepresent the8201DTthe Commonwealth8202NNcommonwealth in8203INin the8204DTthe Title8205NPTitle III8206NPIII proceedings8207NNSproceeding .8208SENT. If8209INif they8210PPthey had8211VHDhave created8212VVNcreate the8213DTthe Title8214NPTitle III8215NPIII proceeding8216NNproceeding but8217CCbut not8218RBnot otherwise8219RBotherwise specified8220VVNspecify that8221IN/thatthat the8222DTthe Board8223NPBoard would8224MDwould play8225VVplay a8226DTa role8227NNrole ,8228,, and8229CCand the8230DTthe governor8231NNgovernor had8232VHDhave filed8233VVNfile this8234DTthis petition8235NNpetition ,8236,, I8237PPI do8238VVPdo n't8239RBn't think8240VVthink anyone8241NNanyone believes8242VVZbelieve that8243WDTthat would8244MDwould have8245VHhave converted8246VVNconvert the8247DTthe governor8248NNgovernor into8249INinto a8250DTa federal8251JJfederal officer8252NNofficer ,8253,, any8254DTany more8255JJRmore than8256INthan the8257DTthe mayor8258NNmayor of8259INof Detroit8260NPDetroit or8261CCor anybody8262NNanybody else8263RBelse .8264SENT. To8265TOTo say8266VVsay just8267RBjust a8268DTa quick8269JJquick word8270NNword on8271INon the8272DTthe ...8273:... on8274INon the8275DTthe ...8276:... on8277INon the8278DTthe remedy8279NNremedy .8280SENT. As8281INas we8282PPwe tried8283VVDtry to8284TOto say8285VVsay ,8286,, I8287PPI think8288VVPthink there8289EXthere are8290VBPbe two8291CDtwo things8292NNSthing at8293INat play8294NNplay ,8295,, the8296DTthe de8297FWde facto8298FWfacto officer8299NNofficer doctrine8300NNdoctrine ,8301,, to8302TOto ensure8303VVensure you8304PPyou have8305VHPhave not8306RBnot applied8307VVNapply it8308PPit to8309TOto adjudicators8310NNSadjudicator ,8311,, that8312WDTthat 's8313VBZbe Ryder8314NPRyder ,8315,, but8316CCbut you8317PPyou have8318VHPhave more8319JJRmore than8320INthan a8321DTa dozen8322NNdozen cases8323NNScase applying8324VVGapply it8325PPit to8326TOto legislative8327JJlegislative and8328CCand executive8329JJexecutive bodies8330NNSbody ,8331,, that8332WDTthat 's8333VBZbe Buckley8334NPBuckley .8335SENT. This8336DTthis is8337VBZbe an8338DTan executive8339JJexecutive body8340NNbody that8341WDTthat 's8342VBZbe not8343RBnot doing8344VVGdo adjudication8345NNadjudication .8346SENT. Right8347RBright ?8348SENT? So8349RBso I8350PPI think8351VVPthink it8352PPit falls8353VVZfall squarely8354RBsquarely within8355INwithin that8356DTthat ...8357:... it8358PPit ...8359:... that8360IN/thatthat set8361VVNset of8362INof cases8363NNScase .8364SENT. And8365CCand ,8366,, indeed8367RBindeed ,8368,, I8369PPI think8370VVPthink it8371PPit 's8372VBZbe sort8373NNsort of8374INof the8375DTthe classic8376JJclassic case8377NNcase for8378INfor that8379WDTthat ,8380,, given8381VVNgive the8382DTthe immense8383JJimmense reliance8384NNreliance interests8385NNSinterest that8386WDTthat have8387VHPhave been8388VBNbe built8389VVNbuild up8390RPup on8391INon the8392DTthe Board8393NPBoard over8394INover the8395DTthe next8396JJnext three8397CDthree years8398NNSyear ,8399,, going8400VVGgo forward8401RBforward ,8402,, everybody8403NNeverybody agrees8404VVZagree we8405PPwe need8406VVPneed a8407DTa stay8408NNstay in8409INin order8410NNorder to8411TOto confirm8412VVconfirm a8413DTa new8414JJnew Board8415NPBoard ,8416,, if8417INif you8418PPyou decide8419VVPdecide we8420PPwe 're8421VBPbe wrong8422JJwrong on8423INon the8424DTthe merits8425NNSmerit .8426SENT. I8427PPI think8428VVPthink the8429DTthe right8430JJright model8431NNmodel there8432EXthere is8433VBZbe Northern8434NPNorthern Pipeline8435NPPipeline .8436SENT. That8437DTthat was8438VBDbe six8439CDsix months8440NNSmonth .8441SENT. Same8442JJsame thing8443NNthing here8444RBhere .8445SENT. You8446PPyou 've8447VHPhave got8448VVNget to8449TOto get8450VVget them8451PPthem out8452RPout of8453INof committee8454NNcommittee .8455SENT. You8456PPyou 've8457VHPhave got8458VVNget to8459TOto get8460VVget them8461PPthem through8462INthrough the8463DTthe floor8464NNfloor .8465SENT. They8466PPthey 're8467VBPbe going8468VVGgo to8469TOto have8470VHhave to8471TOto do8472VVdo some8473DTsome amount8474NNamount of8475INof ratification8476NNratification .8477SENT. And8478CCand then8479RBthen they8480PPthey 're8481VBPbe going8482VVGgo to8483TOto have8484VHhave to8485TOto act8486VVact going8487VVGgo forward8488RBforward .8489SENT. At8490INat a8491DTa minimum8492NNminimum ,8493,, though8494RBthough ,8495,, I8496PPI 'd8497MDwould say8498VVsay we8499PPwe need8500VVneed three8501CDthree months8502NNSmonth with8503INwith the8504DTthe ability8505NNability to8506TOto come8507VVcome back8508RBback and8509CCand report8510VVreport progress8511NNprogress just8512RBjust like8513INlike what8514WPwhat we8515PPwe did8516VVDdo in8517INin the8518DTthe First8519NPFirst Circuit8520NPCircuit ,8521,, because8522INbecause we8523PPwe 've8524VHPhave got8525VVNget to8526TOto allow8527VVallow Congress8528NPCongress and8529CCand then8530RBthen the8531DTthe Board8532NPBoard some8533DTsome time8534NNtime to8535TOto ...8536:... to8537TOto act8538VVact .8539SENT. If8540INif the8541DTthe Board8542NPBoard is8543VBZbe shut8544VVNshut down8545RPdown in8546INin Puerto8547NPPuerto Rico8548NPRico ,8549,, I8550PPI do8551VVPdo think8552VVthink it8553PPit imperils8554VVZimperil a8555DTa process8556NNprocess on8557INon which8558WDTwhich we8559PPwe have8560VHPhave made8561VVNmake really8562RBreally substantial8563JJsubstantial gains8564NNSgain in8565INin the8566DTthe last8567JJlast three8568CDthree years8569NNSyear in8570INin trying8571VVGtry to8572TOto stabilize8573VVstabilize the8574DTthe island8575NNisland 's8576POS's finances8577NNSfinance .8578SENT. And8579CCand I8580PPI can8581MDcan 't8582RB't stress8583NNstress to8584TOto the8585DTthe Court8586NPCourt how8587WRBhow important8588JJimportant it8589PPit is8590VBZbe that8591IN/thatthat the8592DTthe Board8593NPBoard be8594VBbe allowed8595VVNallow to8596TOto continue8597VVcontinue to8598TOto do8599VVdo that8600DTthat work8601NNwork .8602SENT. Thank8603VVthank you8604PPyou .8605SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]8606LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank8607VVthank you8608PPyou ,8609,, General8610NPGeneral .8611SENT. Mr8612NPMr .8613SENT. Olson8614NPOlson .8615SENT.

[MR. OLSON T.]8616LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Thank8617VVthank you8618PPyou ,8619,, Mr8620NPMr .8621SENT. Chief8622NPChief Justice8623NPJustice ,8624,, and8625CCand may8626MDmay it8627PPit please8628VVplease the8629DTthe Court8630NPCourt :8631:: In8632INin Federalist8633NPFederalist 488634CD@card@ ,8635,, James8636NPJames Madison8637NPMadison anticipated8638VVNanticipate what8639WPwhat Congress8640NPCongress attempted8641VVDattempt to8642TOto do8643VVdo with8644INwith the8645DTthe PROMESA8646NPPROMESA oversight8647NNoversight board8648NNboard ,8649,, masking8650VVGmask under8651INunder complicated8652JJcomplicated and8653CCand indirect8654JJindirect measures8655NNSmeasure its8656PP$its encroachment8657NNencroachment on8658INon coordinate8659JJcoordinate departments8660NNSdepartment .8661SENT. Drawing8662VVGdraw all8663DTall power8664NNpower into8665INinto its8666PP$its impetuous8667JJimpetuous vortex8668NNvortex ,8669,, he8670PPhe urged8671VVDurge all8672DTall precautions8673NNSprecaution against8674INagainst the8675DTthe enterprising8676JJenterprising ambition8677NNambition of8678INof this8679DTthis department8680NNdepartment .8681SENT. PROMESA8682NPPROMESA was8683VBDbe a8684DTa response8685NNresponse to8686TOto a8687DTa national8688JJnational financial8689JJfinancial crisis8690NNcrisis affecting8691VVGaffect millions8692NNSmillion of8693INof American8694JJAmerican citizens8695NNScitizen ,8696,, including8697VVGinclude 38698CD3 million8699CDmillion citizens8700NNScitizen ,8701,, American8702JJAmerican citizens8703NNScitizen ,8704,, in8705INin Puerto8706NPPuerto Rico8707NPRico .8708SENT. The8709DTthe PROMESA8710NPPROMESA Board8711NPBoard is8712VBZbe appointed8713VVNappoint ,8714,, supervised8715VVNsupervise ,8716,, and8717CCand removable8718JJremovable by8719INby the8720DTthe President8721NPPresident of8722INof the8723DTthe United8724NPUnited States8725NPSStates ,8726,, reports8727VVZreport regularly8728RBregularly on8729INon its8730PP$its budget8731NNbudget and8732CCand decisions8733NNSdecision to8734TOto federal8735JJfederal officials8736NNSofficial ,8737,, and8738CCand makes8739VVZmake recommendations8740NNSrecommendation ...8741:... it8742PPit 's8743VBZbe required8744VVNrequire to8745TOto do8746VVdo so8747RBso under8748INunder the8749DTthe statute8750NNstatute ...8751:... for8752INfor changes8753NNSchange in8754INin PROMESA8755NPPROMESA and8756CCand other8757JJother federal8758JJfederal laws8759NNSlaw ...8760:... other8761JJother federal8762JJfederal laws8763NNSlaw .8764SENT. It8765PPit presides8766VVZpreside over8767INover the8768DTthe largest8769JJSlarge municipal8770JJmunicipal bankruptcy8771NNbankruptcy proceeding8772NNproceeding in8773INin United8774NPUnited States8775NPSStates history8776NNhistory ,8777,, managing8778VVGmanage over8779INover 1008780CD@card@ billion8781CDbillion dollars8782NNSdollar in8783INin indebtedness8784NNindebtedness ,8785,, 165,0008786CD@card@ claims8787NNSclaim ,8788,, including8789VVGinclude over8790INover 2008791CD@card@ claw-back8792NNclaw-back actions8793NNSaction ,8794,, lawsuits8795NNSlawsuit against8796INagainst major8797JJmajor financial8798JJfinancial institutions8799NNSinstitution ,8800,, in8801INin a8802DTa proceeding8803NNproceeding in8804INin an8805DTan Article8806NPArticle III8807NPIII district8808NNdistrict court8809NNcourt designated8810VVNdesignate by8811INby the8812DTthe Chief8813NPChief Justice8814NPJustice of8815INof the8816DTthe United8817NPUnited States8818NPSStates .8819SENT. The8820DTthe Board8821NPBoard was8822VBDbe effectively8823RBeffectively chosen8824VVNchoose ...8825:... these8826DTthese are8827VBPbe the8828DTthe words8829NNSword of8830INof the8831DTthe congressional8832JJcongressional committee8833NNcommittee ...8834:... effectively8835RBeffectively chosen8836VVNchoose by8837INby members8838NNSmember of8839INof Congress8840NPCongress ,8841,, all8842DTall without8843INwithout the8844DTthe advice8845NNadvice and8846CCand consent8847NNconsent of8848INof the8849DTthe Senate8850NPSenate .8851SENT. The8852DTthe Appointments8853NNSappointment Clause8854NNclause is8855VBZbe central8856JJcentral to8857TOto the8858DTthe separation8859NNseparation of8860INof powers8861NNSpower ,8862,, without8863INwithout which8864WDTwhich ,8865,, in8866INin the8867DTthe words8868NNSword of8869INof the8870DTthe framers8871NNSframer ,8872,, we8873PPwe have8874VHPhave the8875DTthe very8876JJvery definition8877NNdefinition of8878INof tyranny8879NNtyranny .8880SENT. It8881PPit was8882VBDbe a8883DTa response8884NNresponse to8885TOto the8886DTthe most8887RBSmost insidious8888JJinsidious and8889CCand powerful8890JJpowerful weapon8891NNweapon of8892INof 18th-century8893JJ18th-century despots8894NNSdespot .8895SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8896LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] If8897INif the8898DTthe Board8899NPBoard were8900VBDbe elected8901VVNelect ,8902,, would8903MDwould it8904PPit be8905VBbe constitutional8906JJconstitutional ?8907SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]8908LOC[MR. OLSON T.] No8909NPNo ,8910,, it8911PPit would8912MDwould not8913RBnot be8914VBbe constitutional8915JJconstitutional because8916INbecause ...8917:... how8918WRBhow ...8919:... and8920CCand ...8921:... and8922CCand ...8923:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8924LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Does8925VVZdo n't8926RBn't that8927WDTthat mean8928VVPmean the8929DTthe Puerto8930NPPuerto Rico8931NPRico governor8932NNgovernor election8933NNelection is8934VBZbe unconstitutional8935JJunconstitutional as8936RBas well8937RBwell then8938RBthen ?8939SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]8940LOC[MR. OLSON T.] No8941NPNo ,8942,, because8943INbecause the8944DTthe Puerto8945NPPuerto Rican8946JJRican authorities8947NNSauthority that8948WDTthat are8949VBPbe given8950VVNgive to8951TOto the8952DTthe Puerto8953NPPuerto Rican8954JJRican governor8955NNgovernor and8956CCand under8957INunder the8958DTthe Puerto8959NPPuerto Rican8960JJRican legislature8961NNlegislature are8962VBPbe primarily8963RBprimarily local8964JJlocal activities8965NNSactivity .8966SENT. I8967PPI just8968RBjust described8969VVDdescribe what8970WPwhat the8971DTthe PROMESA8972NPPROMESA 's8973POS's Board8974NPBoard powers8975NNSpower are8976VBPbe .8977SENT. They8978PPthey are8979VBPbe national8980JJnational in8981INin scope8982NNscope .8983SENT. They8984PPthey bring8985VVPbring cases8986NNScase in8987INin federal8988JJfederal court8989NNcourt against8990INagainst U8991NPU .8992SENT. S8993NPS .8994SENT. citizens8995NNScitizen .8996SENT. They8997PPthey conduct8998VVPconduct an8999DTan extensive9000JJextensive investigation9001NNinvestigation of9002INof the9003DTthe oversight9004NNoversight ...9005:... over9006INover the9007DTthe underwriting9008NNunderwriting practices9009NNSpractice ,9010,, the9011DTthe bond9012NNbond rating9013NNrating situation9014NNsituation with9015INwith respect9016NNrespect to9017TOto this9018DTthis ...9019:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9020LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] All9021NPAll on9022INon behalf9023NNbehalf of9024INof Puerto9025NPPuerto Rico9026NPRico and9027CCand its9028PP$its people9029NNSpeople and9030CCand its9031PP$its agencies9032NNSagency .9033SENT. The9034DTthe Board9035NPBoard is9036VBZbe instructed9037VVNinstruct to9038TOto act9039VVact not9040RBnot on9041INon behalf9042NNbehalf of9043INof the9044DTthe United9045NPUnited States9046NPSStates but9047CCbut on9048INon behalf9049NNbehalf of9050INof Puerto9051NPPuerto Rico9052NPRico in9053INin pressing9054VVGpress these9055DTthese claims9056NNSclaim ?9057SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]9058LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Justice9059NPJustice Ginsburg9060NPGinsburg ,9061,, it9062PPit is9063VBZbe not9064RBnot on9065INon behalf9066NNbehalf of9067INof Puerto9068NPPuerto Rico9069NPRico .9070SENT. It9071PPit is9072VBZbe not9073RBnot an9074DTan internal9075JJinternal Puerto9076NPPuerto Rican9077JJRican operation9078NNoperation .9079SENT. It9080PPit is9081VBZbe an9082DTan oversight9083NNoversight board9084NNboard .9085SENT. This9086DTthis Board9087NPBoard has9088VHZhave the9089DTthe power9090NNpower to9091TOto prescribe9092VVprescribe a9093DTa budget9094NNbudget for9095INfor Puerto9096NPPuerto Rico9097NPRico .9098SENT. It9099PPit has9100VHZhave the9101DTthe power9102NNpower to9103TOto veto9104VVveto decisions9105NNSdecision of9106INof the9107DTthe governor9108NNgovernor of9109INof Puerto9110NPPuerto Rico9111NPRico and9112CCand the9113DTthe legislature9114NNlegislature of9115INof Puerto9116NPPuerto Rico9117NPRico .9118SENT. It9119PPit has9120VHZhave the9121DTthe power9122NNpower and9123CCand has9124VHZhave sued9125VVNsue the9126DTthe governor9127NNgovernor of9128INof Puerto9129NPPuerto Rico9130NPRico and9131CCand government9132NNgovernment ...9133:... Puerto9134NPPuerto Rican9135NPRican officials9136NNSofficial .9137SENT. It9138PPit 's9139VHZhave called9140VVNcall an9141DTan oversight9142NNoversight board9143NNboard because9144INbecause it9145PPit is9146VBZbe not9147RBnot internal9148JJinternal to9149TOto Puerto9150NPPuerto Rico9151NPRico .9152SENT. It9153PPit ...9154:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9155LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well9156UHWell ,9157,, but9158CCbut its9159PP$its oversight9160NNoversight concerns9161NNSconcern ...9162:... every9163DTevery sentence9164NNsentence you9165PPyou just9166RBjust said9167VVDsay there9168RBthere ,9169,, it9170PPit 's9171VBZbe of9172INof Puerto9173NPPuerto Rico9174NPRico ,9175,, of9176INof Puerto9177NPPuerto Rico9178NPRico .9179SENT. Its9180PP$its focus9181NNfocus is9182VBZbe on9183INon Puerto9184NPPuerto Rico9185NPRico .9186SENT. Yes9187UHyes ,9188,, the9189DTthe activities9190NNSactivity ,9191,, as9192INas things9193NNSthing in9194INin any9195DTany of9196INof the9197DTthe territories9198NNSterritory often9199RBoften do9200VVPdo ,9201,, has9202VHZhave broader9203JJRbroad impact9204NNimpact .9205SENT. I9206PPI get9207VVPget ...9208:... I9209PPI 'll9210MDwill get9211VVget back9212RBback to9213TOto the9214DTthe question9215NNquestion I9216PPI asked9217VVDask your9218PP$your friend9219NNfriend ,9220,, Mr9221NPMr .9222SENT. Verrilli9223NPVerrilli .9224SENT. What9225WPWhat if9226INif we9227PPwe ...9228:... I9229PPI mean9230VVPmean ,9231,, I9232PPI think9233VVPthink it9234PPit 's9235VBZbe very9236RBvery artificial9237JJartificial to9238TOto look9239VVlook at9240INat this9241DTthis and9242CCand say9243VVPsay ,9244,, is9245VBZbe this9246DTthis local9247JJlocal or9248CCor is9249VBZbe this9250DTthis national9251JJnational ?9252SENT? It9253PPit obviously9254RBobviously is9255VBZbe some9256DTsome of9257INof each9258DTeach ,9259,, or9260CCor even9261RBeven the9262DTthe local9263JJlocal aspects9264NNSaspect certainly9265RBcertainly have9266VHPhave national9267JJnational implications9268NNSimplication .9269SENT. So9270RBso ,9271,, again9272RBagain ,9273,, I9274PPI mean9275VVPmean ,9276,, where9277WRBwhere ...9278:... where9279WRBwhere do9280VVPdo we9281PPwe ...9282:... I9283PPI know9284VVPknow what9285WPwhat your9286PP$your answer9287NNanswer is9288VBZbe ,9289,, but9290CCbut you9291PPyou could9292MDcould explain9293VVexplain it9294PPit .9295SENT. What9296WPWhat do9297VVPdo you9298PPyou do9299VVPdo with9300INwith ...9301:... what9302WPwhat ...9303:... what9304WPwhat do9305VVPdo I9306PPI do9307VVPdo if9308INif I9309PPI view9310VVPview it9311PPit as9312INas some9313DTsome of9314INof each9315DTeach ?9316SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]9317LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well9318UHwell ,9319,, it9320PPit is9321VBZbe overwhelmingly9322RBoverwhelmingly a9323DTa federal9324JJfederal problem9325NNproblem dealing9326VVGdeal with9327INwith a9328DTa federal9329JJfederal issue9330NNissue .9331SENT. In9332INin the9333DTthe ...9334:... in9335INin the9336DTthe Limtiaco9337NPLimtiaco case9338NNcase just9339RBjust in9340INin 20079341CD@card@ ,9342,, with9343INwith an9344DTan issue9345NNissue involving9346VVGinvolve insolvency9347NNinsolvency or9348CCor potential9349JJpotential insolvency9350NNinsolvency of9351INof Guam9352NPGuam ,9353,, this9354DTthis Court9355NPCourt said9356VVDsay this9357DTthis is9358VBZbe not9359RBnot a9360DTa local9361JJlocal problem9362NNproblem .9363SENT. This9364DTthis is9365VBZbe the9366DTthe ...9367:... the9368DTthe insolvency9369NNinsolvency of9370INof a9371DTa territory9372NNterritory is9373VBZbe a9374DTa national9375JJnational ...9376:... is9377VBZbe a9378DTa national9379JJnational issue9380NNissue .9381SENT. It9382PPit 's9383VBZbe a9384DTa federal9385JJfederal issue9386NNissue .9387SENT. The9388DTthe concern9389NNconcern of9390INof the9391DTthe United9392NPUnited States9393NPSStates ...9394:... this9395DTthis is9396VBZbe in9397INin a9398DTa sense9399NNsense a9400DTa little9401JJlittle bit9402NNbit like9403INlike the9404DTthe Lebron9405NPLebron case9406NNcase or9407CCor other9408JJother cases9409NNScase where9410WRBwhere this9411DTthis Court9412NPCourt has9413VHZhave said9414VVNsay the9415DTthe Congress9416NPCongress is9417VBZbe dealing9418VVGdeal with9419INwith a9420DTa significant9421JJsignificant federal9422JJfederal problem9423NNproblem .9424SENT. It9425PPit has9426VHZhave come9427VVNcome up9428RPup with9429INwith a9430DTa federal9431JJfederal solution9432NNsolution and9433CCand has9434VHZhave given9435VVNgive this9436DTthis Board9437NPBoard powers9438NNSpower over9439INover citizens9440NNScitizen all9441RBall over9442INover the9443DTthe United9444NPUnited States9445NPSStates .9446SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9447LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But9448CCbut I9449PPI think9450VVPthink the9451DTthe response9452NNresponse on9453INon the9454DTthe other9455JJother side9456NNside is9457VBZbe that9458IN/thatthat they9459PPthey 've9460VHPhave taken9461VVNtake some9462DTsome of9463INof the9464DTthe powers9465NNSpower and9466CCand responsibilities9467NNSresponsibility that9468WDTthat belonged9469VVDbelong to9470TOto the9471DTthe governor9472NNgovernor and9473CCand to9474TOto the9475DTthe legislature9476NNlegislature and9477CCand given9478VVNgive them9479PPthem to9480TOto the9481DTthe Board9482NPBoard ,9483,, and9484CCand the9485DTthe governor9486NNgovernor ,9487,, as9488INas you9489PPyou acknowledged9490VVDacknowledge ,9491,, is9492VBZbe elected9493VVNelect ,9494,, not9495RBnot appointed9496VVNappoint consistent9497JJconsistent with9498INwith the9499DTthe Appointments9500NNSappointment Clause9501NNclause .9502SENT. So9503RBso is9504VBZbe that9505RBthat wrong9506JJwrong that9507IN/thatthat they9508PPthey 've9509VHPhave taken9510VVNtake the9511DTthe powers9512NNSpower from9513INfrom the9514DTthe governor9515NNgovernor and9516CCand legislature9517NNlegislature and9518CCand given9519VVNgive them9520PPthem to9521TOto the9522DTthe Board9523NPBoard ?9524SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]9525LOC[MR. OLSON T.] They9526PPthey 've9527VHPhave taken9528VVNtake all9529RBall of9530INof the9531DTthe powers9532NNSpower with9533INwith respect9534NNrespect to9535TOto the9536DTthe financial9537JJfinancial situation9538NNsituation in9539INin Puerto9540NPPuerto Rico9541NPRico and9542CCand given9543VVNgive it9544PPit to9545TOto the9546DTthe federal-created9547JJfederal-created Board9548NPBoard ,9549,, which9550WDTwhich is9551VBZbe appointed9552VVNappoint by9553INby the9554DTthe President9555NPPresident ,9556,, removable9557JJremovable by9558INby the9559DTthe President9560NPPresident ,9561,, and9562CCand has9563VHZhave supervisorial9564JJsupervisorial authorities9565NNSauthority under9566INunder the9567DTthe ...9568:... the9569DTthe very9570JJvery statute9571NNstatute ...9572:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9573LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] But9574CCbut ,9575,, Mr9576NPMr .9577SENT. Olson9578NPOlson ,9579,, I9580PPI ...9581:... I9582PPI think9583VVPthink the9584DTthe question9585NNquestion is9586VBZbe ...9587:... [JUSTICE ALITO]9588LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Mr9589NPMr .9590SENT. Olson9591NPOlson ...9592:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9593LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...9594:... if9595INif ,9596,, but9597CCbut for9598INfor this9599DTthis statute9600NNstatute ...9601:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9602LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Right9603NPRight .9604SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9605LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...9606:... who9607WPwho would9608MDwould ...9609:... who9610WPwho would9611MDwould be9612VBbe doing9613VVGdo these9614DTthese activities9615NNSactivity ?9616SENT? And9617CCand if9618INif it9619PPit would9620MDwould be9621VBbe the9622DTthe governor9623NNgovernor of9624INof Puerto9625NPPuerto Rico9626NPRico ...9627:... [MR. OLSON T.]9628LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The9629DTthe governor9630NNgovernor ...9631:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9632LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...9633:... then9634RBthen does9635VVZdo n't9636RBn't that9637WDTthat tell9638VVPtell us9639PPus something9640NNsomething ?9641SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]9642LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The9643DTthe governor9644NNgovernor of9645INof Puerto9646NPPuerto Rico9647NPRico does9648VVZdo not9649RBnot have9650VHhave the9651DTthe power9652NNpower to9653TOto do9654VVdo these9655DTthese activities9656NNSactivity .9657SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9658LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I9659PPI understand9660VVPunderstand that9661RBthat .9662SENT. But9663CCbut for9664INfor this9665DTthis statute9666NNstatute ,9667,, who9668WPwho would9669MDwould ?9670SENT? Would9671MDwould n't9672RBn't it9673PPit be9674VBbe the9675DTthe governor9676NNgovernor ?9677SENT? That9678DTthat 's9679VBZbe what9680WPwhat ...9681:... [MR. OLSON T.]9682LOC[MR. OLSON T.] No9683NPNo .9684SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9685LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...9686:... that9687WDTthat 's9688VBZbe what9689WPwhat your9690PP$your colleagues9691NNScolleague ...9692:... [MR. OLSON T.]9693LOC[MR. OLSON T.] But9694CCbut for9695INfor the9696DTthe statute9697NNstatute ,9698,, this9699DTthis authority9700NNauthority to9701TOto do9702VVdo ...9703:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9704LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] That9705DTthat 's9706VBZbe what9707WPwhat your9708PP$your colleagues9709NNScolleague suggest9710VVPsuggest .9711SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]9712LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well9713UHWell ...9714:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]9715LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] And9716CCand is9717VBZbe ...9718:... if9719INif that9720WDTthat 's9721VBZbe erroneous9722JJerroneous ,9723,, could9724MDcould you9725PPyou direct9726VVdirect us9727PPus to9728TOto what9729WPwhat ...9730:... who9731WPwho would9732MDwould do9733VVdo it9734PPit but9735CCbut for9736INfor the9737DTthe statute9738NNstatute ?9739SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]9740LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The9741DTthe statute9742NNstatute was9743VBDbe created9744VVNcreate because9745INbecause the9746DTthe ...9747:... the9748DTthe governor9749NNgovernor of9750INof Puerto9751NPPuerto Rico9752NPRico ...9753:... and9754CCand there9755EXthere was9756VBDbe no9757DTno authority9758NNauthority for9759INfor officials9760NNSofficial in9761INin Puerto9762NPPuerto Rico9763NPRico to9764TOto do9765VVdo these9766DTthese responsibilities9767NNSresponsibility ,9768,, to9769TOto bring9770VVbring these9771DTthese actions9772NNSaction ...9773:... these9774DTthese actions9775NNSaction against9776INagainst financial9777JJfinancial institutions9778NNSinstitution in9779INin the9780DTthe mainland9781NNmainland ,9782,, to9783TOto bring9784VVbring ...9785:... to9786TOto overturn9787VVoverturn the9788DTthe budget9789NNbudget ,9790,, to9791TOto do9792VVdo these9793DTthese various9794JJvarious things9795NNSthing ,9796,, to9797TOto bring9798VVbring suit9799NNsuit against9800INagainst the9801DTthe governor9802NNgovernor himself9803PPhimself .9804SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9805LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Why9806WRBwhy could9807MDcould n't9808RBn't they9809PPthey ?9810SENT? Why9811WRBwhy could9812MDcould n't9813RBn't they9814PPthey ?9815SENT? They9816PPthey 'd9817MDwould pass9818VVpass a9819DTa law9820NNlaw ,9821,, a9822DTa Puerto9823NPPuerto Rican9824JJRican law9825NNlaw ,9826,, which9827WDTwhich would9828MDwould give9829VVgive them9830PPthem authority9831NNauthority to9832TOto do9833VVdo it9834PPit .9835SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]9836LOC[MR. OLSON T.] They9837PPthey ...9838:... they9839PPthey would9840MDwould not9841RBnot have9842VHhave the9843DTthe power9844NNpower to9845TOto have9846VHhave the9847DTthe reach9848NNreach that9849IN/thatthat this9850DTthis PROMESA9851NPPROMESA ...9852:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9853LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] What9854WPWhat ?9855SENT? Give9856VVgive me9857PPme an9858DTan example9859NNexample .9860SENT. I9861PPI mean9862VVPmean ,9863,, if9864INif the9865DTthe legislature9866NNlegislature and9867CCand governor9868NNgovernor wanted9869VVDwant to9870TOto do9871VVdo it9872PPit ,9873,, they9874PPthey would9875MDwould pass9876VVpass a9877DTa law9878NNlaw .9879SENT. They9880PPthey would9881MDwould represent9882VVrepresent Puerto9883NPPuerto Rico9884NPRico in9885INin the9886DTthe bankruptcy9887NNbankruptcy proceeding9888NNproceeding .9889SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]9890LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well9891UHWell ...9892:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9893LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] They9894PPthey would9895MDwould ...9896:... they9897PPthey would9898MDwould take9899VVtake care9900NNcare of9901INof the9902DTthe problem9903NNproblem .9904SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]9905LOC[MR. OLSON T.] That9906DTthat case9907NNcase was9908VBDbe before9909INbefore this9910DTthis Court9911NPCourt just9912RBjust a9913DTa couple9914NNcouple of9915INof years9916NNSyear ago9917RBago .9918SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9919LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Right9920NPRight .9921SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]9922LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The9923NPThe ...9924:... the9925DTthe case9926NNcase involving9927VVGinvolve whether9928INwhether or9929CCor not9930RBnot Puerto9931NPPuerto Rico9932NPRico could9933MDcould use9934VVuse the9935DTthe bankruptcy9936NNbankruptcy statutes9937NNSstatute to9938TOto do9939VVdo ...9940:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9941LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No9942UHNo ,9943,, no9944UHno ,9945,, no9946UHno ,9947,, I9948PPI 'm9949VBPbe saying9950VVGsay we9951PPwe set9952VVDset up9953RPup a9954DTa ...9955:... what9956WPwhat I9957PPI think9958VVPthink you9959PPyou 're9960VBPbe being9961VBGbe asked9962VVNask by9963INby several9964JJseveral of9965INof us9966PPus is9967VBZbe :9968:: Look9969VVlook at9970INat all9971PDTall the9972DTthe powers9973NNSpower that9974IN/thatthat the9975DTthe ...9976:... that9977IN/thatthat the9978DTthe Board9979NPBoard has9980VHZhave .9981SENT. Are9982VBPbe n't9983RBn't they9984PPthey powers9985VVZpower that9986IN/thatthat the9987DTthe Puerto9988NPPuerto Rican9989JJRican government9990NNgovernment could9991MDcould exercise9992VVexercise if9993INif it9994PPit had9995VHDhave the9996DTthe legislative9997JJlegislative and9998CCand gubernatorial9999JJgubernatorial will10000NNwill ?10001SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10002LOC[MR. OLSON T.] I10003PPI submit10004VVPsubmit ...10005:... [JUSTICE BREYER]10006LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Which10007WDTwhich one10008PPone could10009MDcould n't10010RBn't it10011PPit ?10012SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10013LOC[MR. OLSON T.] I10014PPI think10015VVPthink virtually10016RBvirtually all10017RBall of10018INof them10019PPthem ,10020,, Justice10021NPJustice Breyer10022NPBreyer .10023SENT. This10024DTthis is10025VBZbe a10026DTa long10027JJlong statute10028NNstatute prescribing10029VVGprescribe an10030DTan enormous10031JJenormous range10032NNrange of10033INof powers10034NNSpower ,10035,, given10036VVNgive the10037DTthe ability10038NNability to10039TOto overturn10040VVoverturn decisions10041NNSdecision of10042INof the10043DTthe governor10044NNgovernor ,10045,, to10046TOto reverse10047VVreverse ...10048:... [JUSTICE BREYER]10049LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] You10050PPyou know10051VVPknow ,10052,, I10053PPI understand10054VVPunderstand that10055IN/thatthat ,10056,, but10057CCbut I10058PPI do10059VVPdo n't10060RBn't want10061VVwant to10062TOto repeat10063VVrepeat my10064PP$my question10065NNquestion .10066SENT. You10067PPyou see10068VVPsee what10069WPwhat my10070PP$my question10071NNquestion was10072VBDbe ?10073SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10074LOC[MR. OLSON T.] I10075PPI do10076VVPdo see10077VVsee what10078WPwhat your10079PP$your ...10080:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10081LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Mr10082NPMr .10083SENT. Olson10084NPOlson ,10085,, I10086PPI think10087VVPthink the10088DTthe basic10089JJbasic question10090NNquestion ,10091,, if10092INif I10093PPI can10094MDcan simplify10095VVsimplify it10096PPit ,10097,, I10098PPI believe10099VVPbelieve ,10100,, is10101VBZbe could10102MDcould n't10103RBn't the10104DTthe governor10105NNgovernor of10106INof Puerto10107NPPuerto Rico10108NPRico and10109CCand the10110DTthe legislature10111NNlegislature have10112VHPhave created10113VVNcreate their10114PP$their own10115JJown fiscal10116JJfiscal rescue10117NNrescue plan10118NNplan ?10119SENT? Yes10120UHyes .10121SENT. Correct10122JJcorrect ?10123SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10124LOC[MR. OLSON T.] No10125NPNo ,10126,, I10127PPI do10128VVPdo n't10129RBn't believe10130VVbelieve so10131RBso .10132SENT. I10133PPI think10134VVPthink ...10135:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10136LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Why10137WRBwhy ?10138SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10139LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...10140:... that10141WDTthat was10142VBDbe the10143DTthe case10144NNcase that10145WDTthat would10146MDwould give10147VVgive the10148DTthe authority10149NNauthority to10150TOto adjust10151VVadjust debts10152NNSdebt ,10153,, to10154TOto accommodate10155VVaccommodate the10156DTthe various10157JJvarious different10158JJdifferent creditors10159NNScreditor ,10160,, to10161TOto ...10162:... to10163TOto ...10164:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10165LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Oh10166UHoh ,10167,, you10168PPyou 're10169VBPbe talking10170VVGtalk about10171RBabout ...10172:... we10173PPwe are10174VBPbe ...10175:... okay10176JJokay .10177SENT. I10178PPI guess10179VVPguess your10180PP$your intention10181NNintention is10182VBZbe that10183IN/thatthat without10184INwithout PROMESA10185NPPROMESA ,10186,, the10187DTthe bankruptcy10188NNbankruptcy law10189NNlaw would10190MDwould n't10191RBn't have10192VHhave changed10193VVNchange to10194TOto permit10195VVpermit Puerto10196NPPuerto Rico10197NPRico ...10198:... [MR. OLSON T.]10199LOC[MR. OLSON T.] It10200PPit ...10201:... it10202PPit would10203MDwould ...10204:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10205LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...10206:... to10207TOto file10208VVfile ...10209:... [MR. OLSON T.]10210LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...10211:... it10212PPit would10213MDwould not10214RBnot .10215SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10216LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...10217:... its10218PP$its action10219NNaction ...10220:... [MR. OLSON T.]10221LOC[MR. OLSON T.] And10222CCand this10223DTthis statute10224NNstatute ...10225:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10226LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...10227:... so10228RBso ...10229:... [MR. OLSON T.]10230LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...10231:... went10232VVDgo far10233RBfar beyond10234INbeyond the10235DTthe bankruptcy10236NNbankruptcy powers10237NNSpower .10238SENT. The10239DTthe powers10240NNSpower that10241WDTthat are10242VBPbe given10243VVNgive to10244TOto this10245DTthis Board10246NPBoard are10247VBPbe vastly10248RBvastly greater10249JJRgreat than10250INthan powers10251NNSpower that10252WDTthat are10253VBPbe available10254JJavailable on10255INon the10256DTthe ...10257:... [JUSTICE ALITO]10258LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Mr10259NPMr .10260SENT. Olson10261NPOlson ...10262:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10263LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So10264INso what10265WPwhat you10266PPyou 're10267VBPbe basically10268RBbasically saying10269VVGsay is10270VBZbe ,10271,, without10272INwithout this10273DTthis federal10274JJfederal law10275NNlaw creating10276VVGcreate the10277DTthe structure10278NNstructure ,10279,, the10280DTthe structure10281NNstructure itself10282PPitself could10283MDcould n't10284RBn't exist10285VVexist under10286INunder existing10287VVGexist law10288NNlaw ?10289SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10290LOC[MR. OLSON T.] That10291DTthat 's10292VBZbe correct10293JJcorrect .10294SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]10295LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Justice10296NPJustice Alito10297NPAlito .10298SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10299LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So10300INso the10301DTthe legislature10302NNlegislature could10303MDcould n't10304RBn't do10305VVdo it10306PPit ?10307SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10308LOC[MR. OLSON T.] That10309DTthat 's10310VBZbe correct10311JJcorrect .10312SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]10313LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Mr10314NPMr .10315SENT. Olson10316NPOlson ,10317,, are10318VBPbe you10319PPyou and10320CCand your10321PP$your client10322NNclient here10323RBhere just10324RBjust to10325TOto defend10326VVdefend the10327DTthe integrity10328NNintegrity of10329INof the10330DTthe Constitution10331NPConstitution ,10332,, or10333CCor would10334MDwould one10335PPone be10336VBbe excessively10337RBexcessively cynical10338JJcynical to10339TOto think10340VVthink that10341DTthat something10342NNsomething else10343RBelse is10344VBZbe involved10345VVNinvolve here10346RBhere involving10347VVGinvolve money10348NNmoney ?10349SENT? And10350CCand ,10351,, if10352INif so10353RBso ,10354,, what10355WPwhat is10356VBZbe it10357PPit ?10358SENT? What10359WPWhat did10360VVDdo the10361DTthe Board10362NPBoard do10363VVPdo that10364IN/thatthat hurt10365VVNhurt your10366PP$your client10367NNclient ?10368SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10369LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well10370UHWell ,10371,, with10372INwith ...10373:... my10374PP$my ...10375:... aside10376RBaside from10377INfrom the10378DTthe constitutional10379JJconstitutional right10380NNright to10381TOto an10382DTan officer10383NNofficer ...10384:... [JUSTICE ALITO]10385LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well10386UHwell ,10387,, I10388PPI mean10389VVPmean ,10390,, are10391VBPbe you10392PPyou ...10393:... are10394VBPbe you10395PPyou and10396CCand Aurelius10397NPAurelius here10398RBhere just10399RBjust as10400RBas ...10401:... as10402INas amici10403NNSamici to10404TOto defend10405VVdefend the10406DTthe Constitution10407NPConstitution ,10408,, or10409CCor do10410VVPdo you10411PPyou have10412VHPhave some10413DTsome kind10414NNkind of10415INof a10416DTa concrete10417JJconcrete grievance10418NNgrievance ?10419SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10420LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The10421DTthe process10422NNprocess is10423VBZbe not10424RBnot complete10425JJcomplete ,10426,, Justice10427NPJustice Alito10428NPAlito .10429SENT. The10430DTthe process10431NNprocess is10432VBZbe ongoing10433JJongoing .10434SENT. My10435PP$my client10436NNclient is10437VBZbe being10438VBGbe subjected10439VVNsubject to10440TOto a10441DTa process10442NNprocess that10443WDTthat is10444VBZbe governed10445VVNgovern by10446INby officials10447NNSofficial that10448WDTthat were10449VBDbe appointed10450VVNappoint in10451INin violation10452NNviolation of10453INof the10454DTthe separation10455NNseparation of10456INof powers10457NNSpower .10458SENT. So10459INso that10460DTthat sense10461NNsense ,10462,, it10463PPit is10464VBZbe n't10465RBn't complete10466JJcomplete .10467SENT. We10468PPwe can10469MDcan 't10470RB't describe10471VVdescribe the10472DTthe degree10473NNdegree to10474TOto which10475WDTwhich someone10476NNsomeone might10477MDmight have10478VHhave been10479VBNbe hurt10480VVNhurt .10481SENT. But10482CCbut the10483DTthe Court's10484NPCourt's ...10485:... this10486DTthis Court10487NPCourt 's10488POS's said10489VVDsay over10490RPover and10491CCand over10492RPover again10493RBagain that10494IN/thatthat it10495PPit 's10496VBZbe fundamental10497JJfundamental that10498IN/thatthat an10499DTan officer10500NNofficer of10501INof the10502DTthe United10503NPUnited States10504NPSStates must10505MDmust be10506VBbe appointed10507VVNappoint pursuant10508JJpursuant to10509TOto the10510DTthe Appointments10511NNSappointment Clause10512NNclause .10513SENT. That10514DTthat is10515VBZbe fundamental10516JJfundamental to10517TOto the10518DTthe separation10519NNseparation of10520INof powers10521NNSpower ,10522,, which10523WDTwhich is10524VBZbe fundamental10525JJfundamental to10526TOto the10527DTthe Constitution10528NPConstitution ...10529:... [JUSTICE ALITO]10530LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] I10531PPI mean10532VVPmean ,10533,, you10534PPyou do10535VVPdo n't10536RBn't have10537VHhave to10538TOto answer10539VVanswer this10540DTthis if10541INif you10542PPyou do10543VVPdo n't10544RBn't want10545VVwant to10546TOto ,10547,, but10548CCbut there10549EXthere is10550VBZbe no10551DTno money10552NNmoney issue10553NNissue involved10554VVNinvolve here10555RBhere ?10556SENT? [10557SYM[ LAUGHTER10558NNlaughter ]10559SYM] [MR. OLSON T.]10560LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Of10561INof course10562NNcourse ,10563,, there10564RBthere ...10565:... of10566INof course10567NNcourse ,10568,, there10569RBthere ...10570:... [JUSTICE ALITO]10571LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well10572UHWell ,10573,, what10574WPwhat is10575VBZbe it10576PPit ?10577SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10578LOC[MR. OLSON T.] There10579EXthere 's10580VBZbe over10581RBover ...10582:... [JUSTICE ALITO]10583LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] I10584PPI 'd10585MDwould just10586RBjust like10587VVlike to10588TOto know10589VVknow what10590WPwhat ...10591:... this10592DTthis is10593VBZbe a10594DTa real10595JJreal case10596NNcase .10597SENT. I10598PPI 'd10599MDwould like10600VVlike to10601TOto know10602VVknow what10603WPwhat 's10604VBZbe really10605RBreally going10606VVGgo on10607INon here10608RBhere .10609SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]10610LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well10611UHwell ,10612,, there10613EXthere 's10614VBZbe ...10615:... there10616EXthere 's10617VBZbe over10618RBover 10010619CD@card@ billion10620CDbillion dollars10621NNSdollar of10622INof indebtedness10623NNindebtedness being10624VBGbe adjudicated10625VVNadjudicate in10626INin various10627JJvarious procedures10628NNSprocedure ,10629,, a10630DTa lot10631NNlot of10632INof which10633WDTwhich is10634VBZbe ...10635:... [JUSTICE ALITO]10636LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Right10637NPRight ,10638,, and10639CCand your10640PP$your client10641NNclient wants10642VVZwant more10643JJRmore of10644INof it10645PPit and10646CCand somebody10647NNsomebody else10648RBelse you10649PPyou think10650VVPthink is10651VBZbe getting10652VVGget too10653RBtoo much10654RBmuch .10655SENT. So10656RBso what10657WPwhat is10658VBZbe it10659PPit exactly10660RBexactly ?10661SENT? If10662INif you10663PPyou want10664VVPwant to10665TOto answer10666VVanswer .10667SENT. If10668INif not10669RBnot ...10670:... [MR. OLSON T.]10671LOC[MR. OLSON T.] We10672PPwe can10673MDcan 't10674RB't ...10675:... we10676PPwe can10677MDcan 't10678RB't possibly10679RBpossibly answer10680VVanswer that10681DTthat .10682SENT. There10683EXthere are10684VBPbe these10685DTthese extraordinarily10686RBextraordinarily large10687JJlarge claims10688NNSclaim which10689WDTwhich the10690DTthe governor10691NNgovernor ...10692:... which10693WDTwhich the10694DTthe agencies10695NNSagency of10696INof Puerto10697NPPuerto Rico10698NPRico have10699VHPhave defaulted10700VVNdefault on10701RPon ,10702,, have10703VHPhave not10704RBnot been10705VBNbe able10706JJable to10707TOto pay10708VVpay these10709DTthese claims10710NNSclaim .10711SENT. So10712RBso ,10713,, yes10714UHyes ,10715,, you10716PPyou 're10717VBPbe right10718JJright .10719SENT. Of10720INof course10721NNcourse ,10722,, it10723PPit involves10724VVZinvolve a10725DTa lot10726NNlot of10727INof money10728NNmoney .10729SENT. And10730CCand the10731DTthe money10732NNmoney is10733VBZbe in10734INin a10735DTa process10736NNprocess that10737WDTthat 's10738VBZbe being10739VBGbe adjudicated10740VVNadjudicate by10741INby a10742DTa federal10743JJfederal district10744NNdistrict judge10745NNjudge appointed10746VVNappoint by10747INby the10748DTthe Chief10749NPChief Justice10750NPJustice of10751INof the10752DTthe United10753NPUnited States10754NPSStates .10755SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10756LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] did10757VVDdo n't10758RBn't your10759PP$your client10760NNclient acquiesce10761VVacquiesce in10762INin some10763DTsome settlement10764NNsettlement ?10765SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10766LOC[MR. OLSON T.] There10767EXthere was10768VBDbe a10769DTa settlement10770NNsettlement of10771INof one10772CDone small10773JJsmall piece10774NNpiece of10775INof it10776PPit that10777WDTthat was10778VBDbe ...10779:... that10780WDTthat had10781VHDhave nothing10782NNnothing to10783TOto do10784VVdo with10785INwith ...10786:... at10787INat no10788DTno time10789NNtime did10790VVDdo my10791PP$my clients10792NNSclient relinquish10793VVrelinquish their10794PP$their constitutional10795JJconstitutional claims10796NNSclaim or10797CCor recede10798VVPrecede from10799INfrom them10800PPthem in10801INin any10802DTany way10803NNway .10804SENT. There10805EXthere was10806VBDbe a10807DTa small10808JJsmall settlement10809NNsettlement with10810INwith respect10811NNrespect to10812TOto a10813DTa taxing10814VVGtax authority10815NNauthority where10816WRBwhere the10817DTthe sales10818NNSsale tax10819NNtax went10820VVDgo into10821INinto an10822DTan agency10823NNagency .10824SENT. And10825CCand that10826DTthat part10827NNpart of10828INof it10829PPit has10830VHZhave been10831VBNbe resolved10832VVNresolve .10833SENT. And10834CCand we10835PPwe 've10836VHPhave agreed10837VVNagree not10838RBnot to10839TOto challenge10840VVchallenge ...10841:... my10842PP$my clients10843NNSclient have10844VHPhave agreed10845VVNagree not10846RBnot to10847TOto challenge10848VVchallenge that10849DTthat settlement10850NNsettlement in10851INin any10852DTany way10853NNway .10854SENT. So10855RBso that10856DTthat 's10857VBZbe a10858DTa bit10859NNbit of10860INof a10861DTa ...10862:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]10863LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Mr10864NPMr .10865SENT. Olson10866NPOlson ...10867:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10868LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But10869CCbut this10870DTthis one10871CDone you10872PPyou have10873VHPhave agreed10874VVNagree to10875TOto challenge10876VVchallenge ,10877,, and10878CCand why10879WRBwhy ,10880,, you10881PPyou are10882VBPbe challenging10883VVGchallenge ?10884SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10885LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Pardon10886NPPardon ?10887SENT? [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10888LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] What10889WPWhat is10890VBZbe the10891DTthe difference10892NNdifference between10893INbetween what10894WPwhat you10895PPyou agreed10896VVNagree to10897TOto and10898CCand you10899PPyou 're10900VBPbe not10901RBnot challenging10902VVGchallenge and10903CCand now10904RBnow what10905WPwhat you10906PPyou 're10907VBPbe challenging10908VVGchallenge ?10909SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]10910LOC[MR. OLSON T.] What10911WPWhat we10912PPwe 're10913VBPbe challenging10914VVGchallenge is10915VBZbe the10916DTthe remaining10917VVGremain part10918NNpart of10919INof the10920DTthe procedure10921NNprocedure ,10922,, which10923WDTwhich is10924VBZbe the10925DTthe giant10926JJgiant part10927NNpart of10928INof it10929PPit .10930SENT. This10931DTthis is10932VBZbe a10933DTa small10934JJsmall piece10935NNpiece of10936INof it10937PPit that10938WDTthat was10939VBDbe settled10940VVNsettle in10941INin some10942DTsome way10943NNway and10944CCand ...10945:... and10946CCand there10947EXthere was10948VBDbe really10949RBreally basically10950RBbasically no10951DTno choice10952NNchoice because10953INbecause the10954DTthe Board10955NPBoard was10956VBDbe ongoing10957JJongoing and10958CCand a10959DTa settlement10960NNsettlement was10961VBDbe reached10962VVNreach with10963INwith respect10964NNrespect to10965TOto a10966DTa small10967JJsmall segment10968NNsegment of10969INof the10970DTthe resources10971NNSresource .10972SENT. But10973CCbut in10974INin no10975DTno way10976NNway did10977VVDdo my10978PP$my clients10979NNSclient relinquish10980VVrelinquish its10981PP$its constitutional10982JJconstitutional rights10983NNSright to10984TOto an10985DTan appointment10986NNappointment under10987INunder the10988DTthe Appointments10989NNSappointment Clause10990NNclause .10991SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]10992LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Mr10993NPMr .10994SENT. Olson10995NPOlson ...10996:... [JUSTICE BREYER]10997LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I10998PPI see10999VVPsee that11000IN/thatthat ,11001,, and11002CCand I11003PPI wanted11004VVDwant to11005TOto ask11006VVask you11007PPyou a11008DTa question11009NNquestion ...11010:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11011LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] One11012CDOne thing11013NNthing ...11014:... there11015EXthere was11016VBDbe one11017CDone thing11018NNthing that11019WDTthat ...11020:... [JUSTICE BREYER]11021LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...11022:... that11023IN/thatthat I11024PPI think11025VVPthink you11026PPyou may11027MDmay ...11028:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11029LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I11030PPI 'm11031VBPbe sorry11032JJsorry .11033SENT. Justice11034NPJustice Ginsburg11035NPGinsburg ?11036SENT? [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11037LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...11038:... that11039DTthat ...11040:... that11041WDTthat confuses11042VVZconfuse me11043PPme about11044INabout your11045PP$your presentation11046NNpresentation ,11047,, because11048INbecause you11049PPyou start11050VVPstart out11051RPout very11052RBvery strongly11053RBstrongly that11054IN/thatthat the11055DTthe evil11056NNevil here11057RBhere is11058VBZbe Congress11059NPCongress aggrandizing11060VVGaggrandize itself11061PPitself ,11062,, Congress11063NPCongress aggrandizing11064VVGaggrandize itself11065PPitself at11066INat the11067DTthe executive11068NNexecutive 's11069POS's expense11070NNexpense .11071SENT. How11072WRBHow about11073RBabout the11074DTthe member11075NNmember of11076INof the11077DTthe Board11078NPBoard that11079WDTthat 's11080VBZbe appointed11081VVNappoint by11082INby the11083DTthe President11084NPPresident alone11085RBalone ?11086SENT? There11087EXthere can11088MDcan 't11089RB't be11090VBbe any11091DTany question11092NNquestion of11093INof Congress11094NPCongress aggrandizing11095VVGaggrandize itself11096PPitself .11097SENT. Congress11098NPCongress has11099VHZhave given11100VVNgive the11101DTthe President11102NPPresident alone11103RBalone that11104DTthat authority11105NNauthority .11106SENT. So11107RBso would11108MDwould it11109PPit be11110VBbe unconstitutional11111JJunconstitutional in11112INin your11113PP$your view11114NNview if11115INif all11116DTall of11117INof the11118DTthe members11119NNSmember were11120VBDbe appointed11121VVNappoint by11122INby the11123DTthe President11124NPPresident and11125CCand not11126RBnot subject11127JJsubject to11128TOto the11129DTthe advice11130NNadvice and11131CCand consent11132NNconsent ?11133SENT? I11134PPI do11135VVPdo n't11136RBn't get11137VVget how11138WRBhow that11139DTthat ...11140:... [MR. OLSON T.]11141LOC[MR. OLSON T.] They11142PPthey would11143MDwould ...11144:... they11145PPthey ...11146:... these11147DTthese are11148VBPbe principal11149JJprincipal officers11150NNSofficer of11151INof the11152DTthe United11153NPUnited States11154NPSStates ,11155,, not11156RBnot inferior11157JJinferior officers11158NNSofficer .11159SENT. Therefore11160RBtherefore ,11161,, principal11162JJprincipal officers11163NNSofficer under11164INunder the11165DTthe Constitution11166NPConstitution must11167MDmust be11168VBbe appointed11169VVNappoint ,11170,, nominated11171VVNnominate by11172INby the11173DTthe President11174NPPresident ...11175:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11176LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But11177CCbut what11178WPwhat does11179VVZdo that11180RBthat have11181VHhave to11182TOto do11183VVdo with11184INwith Congress11185NPCongress aggrandizing11186VVGaggrandize itself11187PPitself at11188INat the11189DTthe executive11190NNexecutive 's11191POS's expense11192NNexpense ?11193SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]11194LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well11195UHWell ,11196,, the11197DTthe ...11198:... the11199DTthe ...11200:... they11201PPthey ...11202:... the11203DTthe President11204NPPresident appointed11205VVDappoint one11206CDone without11207INwithout advice11208NNadvice and11209CCand consent11210NNconsent of11211INof the11212DTthe Senate11213NPSenate .11214SENT. That11215DTthat violates11216VVZviolate the11217DTthe Appointments11218NNSappointment Clause11219NNclause .11220SENT. The11221DTthe other11222JJother were11223VBDbe pursuant11224JJpursuant to11225TOto lists11226NNSlist ...11227:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11228LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] How11229WRBHow about11230INabout the11231DTthe D11232NPD .11233SENT. C11234LSc .11235SENT. Control11236NPControl Board11237NPBoard ,11238,, where11239WRBwhere they11240PPthey 're11241VBPbe all11242RBall appointed11243VVNappoint ...11244:... [MR. OLSON T.]11245LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well11246UHwell ,11247,, there11248EXthere 's11249VBZbe ...11250:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11251LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...11252:... by11253INby the11254DTthe President11255NPPresident ?11256SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]11257LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...11258:... that11259WDTthat has11260VHZhave never11261RBnever been11262VBNbe adjudicated11263VVNadjudicate .11264SENT. The11265DTthe government11266NNgovernment itself11267PPitself in11268INin connection11269NNconnection with11270INwith the11271DTthe D11272NPD .11273SENT. C11274LSc .11275SENT. Control11276NPControl Board11277NPBoard took11278VVDtake the11279DTthe position11280NNposition in11281INin an11282DTan Office11283NPOffice of11284INof Legal11285NPLegal Counsel11286NPCounsel opinion11287NNopinion that11288IN/thatthat that11289DTthat was11290VBDbe a11291DTa federal11292JJfederal agency11293NNagency .11294SENT. There11295EXthere has11296VHZhave never11297RBnever been11298VBNbe a11299DTa resolution11300NNresolution of11301INof that11302DTthat .11303SENT. The11304DTthe D11305NPD .11306SENT. C11307LSc .11308SENT. Control11309NPControl Board11310NPBoard has11311VHZhave vastly11312RBvastly more11313JJRmore limited11314JJlimited powers11315NNSpower with11316INwith respect11317NNrespect to11318TOto local11319JJlocal matters11320NNSmatter .11321SENT. And11322CCand our11323PP$our ...11324:... our11325PP$our opponents11326NNSopponent bring11327VVbring up11328RPup and11329CCand rely11330VVrely on11331INon the11332DTthe Palmore11333NPPalmore case11334NNcase ,11335,, which11336WDTwhich had11337VHDhave nothing11338NNnothing to11339TOto do11340VVdo with11341INwith the11342DTthe Appointments11343NNSappointment Clause11344NNclause .11345SENT. It11346PPit was11347VBDbe n't11348RBn't an11349DTan adjudication11350NNadjudication or11351CCor was11352VBDbe n't11353RBn't ...11354:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11355LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] They11356PPthey bring11357VVPbring up11358RBup ...11359:... [MR. OLSON T.]11360LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...11361:... a11362DTa discussion11363NNdiscussion of11364INof ...11365:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11366LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Excuse11367NNexcuse me11368PPme .11369SENT. They11370PPthey bring11371VVPbring up11372RBup home11373RBhome rule11374VVrule more11375RBRmore generally11376RBgenerally .11377SENT. And11378CCand that11379DTthat 's11380VBZbe of11381INof serious11382JJserious concern11383NNconcern here11384RBhere ,11385,, is11386VBZbe if11387INif you11388PPyou were11389VBDbe to11390TOto prevail11391VVprevail here11392RBhere ,11393,, what11394WPwhat would11395MDwould that11396RBthat do11397VVdo for11398INfor home11399NNhome rule11400NNrule and11401CCand the11402DTthe territories11403NNSterritory with11404INwith elected11405JJelected governors11406NNSgovernor ?11407SENT? What11408WPWhat would11409MDwould it11410PPit do11411VVdo for11412INfor the11413DTthe District11414NPDistrict of11415INof Columbia11416NPColumbia with11417INwith the11418DTthe elected11419VVNelect mayor11420NNmayor ,11421,, city11422NNcity council11423NNcouncil ,11424,, the11425DTthe judges11426NNSjudge '11427POS' appointments11428NNSappointment ?11429SENT? How11430WRBHow ,11431,, if11432INif you11433PPyou were11434VBDbe to11435TOto prevail11436VVprevail here11437RBhere ,11438,, would11439MDwould the11440DTthe line11441NNline be11442VBbe drawn11443VVNdraw so11444RBso that11445IN/thatthat it11446PPit does11447VVZdo not11448RBnot affect11449VVaffect home11450NNhome rule11451NNrule ?11452SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]11453LOC[MR. OLSON T.] It11454PPit would11455MDwould not11456RBnot affect11457VVaffect home11458NNhome rule11459NNrule at11460INat all11461DTall .11462SENT. Now11463RBnow people11464NNSpeople might11465MDmight make11466VVmake the11467DTthe argument11468NNargument that11469IN/thatthat PROMESA11470NPPROMESA itself11471PPitself affected11472VVDaffect in11473INin some11474DTsome way11475NNway because11476INbecause it11477PPit took11478VVDtake over11479INover the11480DTthe responsibility11481NNresponsibility of11482INof the11483DTthe ...11484:... of11485INof the11486DTthe Puerto11487NPPuerto Rican11488JJRican officials11489NNSofficial to11490TOto set11491VVset financial11492JJfinancial conditions11493NNScondition ,11494,, establish11495VVestablish a11496DTa budget11497NNbudget ...11498:... budget11499NNbudget ,11500,, and11501CCand all11502DTall of11503INof those11504DTthose things11505NNSthing .11506SENT. But11507CCbut the11508DTthe outcome11509NNoutcome in11510INin favor11511NNfavor of11512INof my11513PP$my clients11514NNSclient in11515INin this11516DTthis case11517NNcase would11518MDwould simply11519RBsimply mean11520VVmean that11521IN/thatthat the11522DTthe same11523JJsame officials11524NNSofficial would11525MDwould be11526VBbe appointed11527VVNappoint pursuant11528JJpursuant to11529TOto the11530DTthe Constitution11531NPConstitution .11532SENT. It11533PPit would11534MDwould n't11535RBn't change11536VVchange home11537NNhome rule11538NNrule .11539SENT. All11540DTall of11541INof the11542DTthe cases11543NNScase that11544IN/thatthat we11545PPwe 've11546VHPhave relied11547VVNrely upon11548RPupon ...11549:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]11550LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But11551CCbut would11552MDwould n't11553RBn't it11554PPit require11555VVPrequire that11556IN/thatthat similar11557JJsimilar officials11558NNSofficial ...11559:... maybe11560RBmaybe I11561PPI 'm11562VBPbe not11563RBnot understanding11564VVGunderstand ...11565:... in11566INin the11567DTthe territories11568NNSterritory who11569WPwho exercise11570VVPexercise territorial11571JJterritorial power11572NNpower ,11573,, but11574CCbut also11575RBalso affect11576VVaffect national11577JJnational power11578NNpower ?11579SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]11580LOC[MR. OLSON T.] What11581WDTwhat ...11582:... what11583WPwhat ...11584:... I11585PPI think11586VVPthink the11587DTthe issue11588NNissue might11589MDmight be11590VBbe primarily11591RBprimarily federal11592JJfederal power11593NNpower or11594CCor versus11595INversus primarily11596RBprimarily local11597JJlocal .11598SENT. The11599DTthe Palmore11600NPPalmore case11601NNcase itself11602PPitself ,11603,, which11604WDTwhich our11605PP$our opponents11606NNSopponent rely11607VVPrely on11608INon repeatedly11609RBrepeatedly ,11610,, says11611VVZsay in11612INin that11613DTthat opinion11614NNopinion those11615DTthose were11616VBDbe primarily11617RBprimarily or11618CCor exclusively11619RBexclusively or11620CCor largely11621RBlargely ...11622:... there11623EXthere are11624VBPbe various11625JJvarious different11626JJdifferent adjectives11627NNSadjective used11628VVNuse in11629INin that11630DTthat opinion11631NNopinion ...11632:... local11633JJlocal D11634NPD .11635SENT. C11636LSc .11637SENT. criminal11638JJcriminal proceedings11639NNSproceeding ,11640,, criminal11641JJcriminal law11642NNlaw under11643INunder the11644DTthe laws11645NNSlaw of11646INof the11647DTthe District11648NPDistrict of11649INof Columbia11650NPColumbia .11651SENT. And11652CCand this11653DTthis Court11654NPCourt has11655VHZhave repeatedly11656RBrepeatedly likened11657VVNliken the11658DTthe power11659NNpower that11660WDTthat can11661MDcan be11662VBbe exercised11663VVNexercise in11664INin the11665DTthe territories11666NNSterritory under11667INunder the11668DTthe territorial11669JJterritorial clause11670NNclause or11671CCor under11672INunder the11673DTthe clause11674NNclause that11675WDTthat gives11676VVZgive power11677NNpower over11678INover the11679DTthe District11680NPDistrict of11681INof Columbia11682NPColumbia local11683JJlocal territorial11684JJterritorial matters11685NNSmatter ,11686,, the11687DTthe type11688NNtype of11689INof authority11690NNauthority that11691WDTthat may11692MDmay be11693VBbe given11694VVNgive by11695INby a11696DTa state11697NNstate to11698TOto a11699DTa local11700JJlocal municipality11701NNmunicipality .11702SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]11703LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Congress11704NPCongress enacts11705VVZenact the11706DTthe D11707NPD .11708SENT. C11709LSc .11710SENT. code11711NNcode ,11712,, right11713RBright ?11714SENT? The11715DTthe D11716NPD .11717SENT. C11718LSc .11719SENT. code11720NNcode is11721VBZbe enacted11722VVNenact by11723INby Congress11724NPCongress ?11725SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]11726LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Yes11727NPYes ,11728,, although11729INalthough ...11730:... well11731RBwell ,11732,, there11733EXthere is11734VBZbe ...11735:... it11736PPit 's11737VBZbe changed11738VVNchange over11739INover time11740NNtime .11741SENT. But11742CCbut ...11743:... but11744CCbut at11745INat ...11746:... at11747INat a11748DTa certain11749JJcertain point11750NNpoint in11751INin time11752NNtime ,11753,, yes11754UHyes .11755SENT. But11756CCbut ...11757:... but11758CCbut the11759DTthe fact11760NNfact is11761VBZbe that11762IN/thatthat there11763EXthere is11764VBZbe a11765DTa difference11766NNdifference between11767INbetween primarily11768RBprimarily local11769JJlocal authority11770NNauthority ,11771,, and11772CCand that11773WDTthat 's11774VBZbe discussed11775VVNdiscuss in11776INin the11777DTthe ...11778:... in11779INin the11780DTthe Palmore11781NPPalmore case11782NNcase .11783SENT. The11784DTthe reason11785NNreason that11786IN/thatthat those11787DTthose ...11788:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]11789LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So11790RBso ...11791:... so11792INso that11793WDTthat does11794VVZdo sound11795NNsound like11796INlike the11797DTthe test11798NNtest that11799WDTthat is11800VBZbe being11801VBGbe used11802VVNuse by11803INby Mr11804NPMr .11805SENT. Verrilli11806NPVerrilli and11807CCand Mr11808NPMr .11809SENT. Wall11810NPWall .11811SENT. I11812PPI mean11813VVPmean ,11814,, they11815PPthey 've11816VHPhave said11817VVNsay that11818IN/thatthat your11819PP$your test11820NNtest is11821VBZbe kind11822NNkind of11823INof malleable11824JJmalleable .11825SENT. And11826CCand I11827PPI guess11828VVPguess what11829WPwhat I11830PPI 'd11831MDwould like11832VVlike ,11833,, what11834WPwhat is11835VBZbe your11836PP$your test11837NNtest ?11838SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]11839LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The11840DTthe test11841NNtest ...11842:... my11843PP$my test11844NNtest is11845VBZbe this11846DTthis Court11847NPCourt 's11848POS's test11849NNtest ,11850,, which11851WDTwhich was11852VBDbe articulated11853VVNarticulate in11854INin the11855DTthe Buckley11856NPBuckley case11857NNcase ,11858,, again11859RBagain in11860INin the11861DTthe ...11862:... in11863INin the11864DTthe ...11865:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]11866LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But11867CCbut you11868PPyou know11869VVPknow what11870WPwhat ...11871:... what11872WPwhat struck11873VVDstrike me11874PPme ...11875:... [MR. OLSON T.]11876LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...11877:... in11878INin the11879DTthe Lucia11880NPLucia case11881NNcase .11882SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]11883LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...11884:... what11885WPwhat struck11886VVDstrike me11887PPme when11888WRBwhen I11889PPI read11890VVPread that11891IN/thatthat ,11892,, when11893WRBwhen I11894PPI read11895VVPread your11896PP$your brief11897NNbrief ,11898,, the11899DTthe Buckley11900NPBuckley test11901NNtest is11902VBZbe significant11903JJsignificant authority11904NNauthority pursuant11905JJpursuant to11906TOto the11907DTthe laws11908NNSlaw of11909INof the11910DTthe United11911NPUnited States11912NPSStates .11913SENT. I11914PPI guess11915VVPguess what11916WPwhat struck11917VVDstrike me11918PPme was11919VBDbe that11920IN/thatthat in11921INin many11922JJmany ...11923:... on11924INon many11925JJmany occasions11926NNSoccasion you11927PPyou modified11928VVDmodify that11929DTthat test11930NNtest in11931INin your11932PP$your brief11933NNbrief .11934SENT. You11935PPyou said11936VVDsay significant11937JJsignificant federal11938JJfederal authority11939NNauthority pursuant11940JJpursuant to11941TOto the11942DTthe laws11943NNSlaw of11944INof the11945DTthe United11946NPUnited States11947NPSStates .11948SENT. And11949CCand when11950WRBwhen you11951PPyou do11952VVPdo that11953IN/thatthat ,11954,, it11955PPit strikes11956VVZstrike me11957PPme that11958IN/thatthat you11959PPyou 're11960VBPbe coming11961VVGcome actually11962RBactually pretty11963RBpretty close11964JJclose ,11965,, I11966PPI mean11967VVPmean ,11968,, and11969CCand if11970INif you11971PPyou agree11972VVPagree on11973INon a11974DTa test11975NNtest ,11976,, that11977WDTthat seems11978VVZseem not11979RBnot a11980DTa bad11981JJbad thing11982NNthing .11983SENT. It11984PPit seems11985VVZseem as11986RBas though11987RBthough ,11988,, when11989WRBwhen you11990PPyou say11991VVPsay significant11992JJsignificant federal11993JJfederal authority11994NNauthority ,11995,, you11996PPyou 're11997VBPbe coming11998VVGcome pretty11999RBpretty close12000JJclose to12001TOto what12002WPwhat Mr12003NPMr .12004SENT. Wall12005NPWall and12006CCand Mr12007NPMr .12008SENT. Verrilli12009NPVerrilli have12010VHPhave proposed12011VVNpropose .12012SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]12013LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well12014UHwell ,12015,, we12016PPwe looked12017VVDlook at12018INat each12019DTeach of12020INof the12021DTthe cases12022NNScase that12023WDTthat are12024VBPbe cited12025VVNcite both12026CCboth in12027INin our12028PP$our briefs12029NNSbrief and12030CCand our12031PP$our opponents12032NNSopponent '12033POS' briefs12034NNSbrief ,12035,, including12036VVGinclude the12037DTthe United12038NPUnited States12039NPSStates '12040POS' briefs12041NNSbrief .12042SENT. The12043DTthe ...12044:... it12045PPit is12046VBZbe ...12047:... it12048PPit is12049VBZbe ...12050:... and12051CCand it12052PPit 's12053VBZbe the12054DTthe test12055NNtest of12056INof this12057DTthis Court12058NPCourt ,12059,, not12060RBnot just12061RBjust in12062INin the12063DTthe Buckley12064NPBuckley case12065NNcase ,12066,, but12067CCbut as12068RBas ...12069:... as12070RBas recently12071RBrecently ...12072:... as12073RBas recently12074RBrecently as12075INas a12076DTa couple12077NNcouple years12078NNSyear ago12079RBago in12080INin the12081DTthe Lucia12082NPLucia case12083NNcase .12084SENT. It12085PPit 's12086VBZbe the12087DTthe same12088JJsame case12089NNcase .12090SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]12091LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Right12092NPRight ,12093,, but12094CCbut always12095RBalways ...12096:... always12097RBalways to12098TOto distinguish12099VVdistinguish between12100INbetween officers12101NNSofficer and12102CCand employees12103NNSemployee .12104SENT. And12105CCand what12106WPwhat I12107PPI 'm12108VBPbe suggesting12109VVGsuggest is12110VBZbe that12111IN/thatthat when12112WRBwhen you12113PPyou apply12114VVPapply it12115PPit to12116TOto this12117DTthis situation12118NNsituation ,12119,, your12120PP$your own12121JJown briefs12122NNSbrief modify12123VVmodify the12124DTthe test12125NNtest by12126INby talking12127VVGtalk about12128INabout federal12129JJfederal authority12130NNauthority and12131CCand implicitly12132RBimplicitly comparing12133VVGcompare federal12134JJfederal authority12135NNauthority to12136TOto local12137JJlocal authority12138NNauthority .12139SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]12140LOC[MR. OLSON T.] And12141CCand we12142PPwe acknowledge12143VVPacknowledge that12144IN/thatthat ,12145,, that12146WDTthat with12147INwith respect12148NNrespect to12149TOto the12150DTthe test12151NNtest that12152IN/thatthat this12153DTthis Court12154NPCourt articulated12155VVDarticulate ,12156,, repeatedly12157RBrepeatedly ,12158,, Lucia12159NPLucia was12160VBDbe just12161RBjust the12162DTthe last12163JJlast time12164NNtime it12165PPit did12166VVDdo ,12167,, that12168DTthat authority12169NNauthority under12170INunder the12171DTthe laws12172NNSlaw of12173INof the12174DTthe United12175NPUnited States12176NPSStates has12177VHZhave always12178RBalways accepted12179VVNaccept the12180DTthe ...12181:... the12182DTthe purely12183RBpurely local12184JJlocal authority12185NNauthority that12186WDTthat 's12187VHZhave been12188VBNbe exercised12189VVNexercise in12190INin the12191DTthe territories12192NNSterritory .12193SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12194LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] So12195RBso if12196INif it12197PPit 's12198VBZbe ...12199:... [MR. OLSON T.]12200LOC[MR. OLSON T.] There12201EXthere 's12202VBZbe also12203RBalso exceptions12204NNSexception for12205INfor transitional12206JJtransitional governments12207NNSgovernment .12208SENT. The12209DTthe Philippines12210NPSPhilippine ,12211,, for12212INfor example12213NNexample .12214SENT. There12215EXthere was12216VBDbe a12217DTa local12218JJlocal government12219NNgovernment and12220CCand then12221RBthen it12222PPit was12223VBDbe replaced12224VVNreplace ...12225:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12226LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Mr12227NPMr .12228SENT. Olson12229NPOlson ,12230,, I'm12231NPI'm ...12232:... I12233PPI 'm12234VBPbe confused12235VVNconfuse .12236SENT. I12237PPI honestly12238RBhonestly do12239VVPdo n't12240RBn't understand12241VVunderstand what12242WPwhat the12243DTthe difference12244NNdifference between12245INbetween your12246PP$your test12247NNtest and12248CCand the12249DTthe government12250NNgovernment 's12251POS's test12252NNtest is12253VBZbe in12254INin this12255DTthis case12256NNcase .12257SENT. If12258INif you12259PPyou could12260MDcould articulate12261VVarticulate that12262IN/thatthat in12263INin a12264DTa few12265JJfew sentences12266NNSsentence ,12267,, I12268PPI 'd12269MDwould be12270VBbe grateful12271JJgrateful .12272SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]12273LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The12274DTthe test12275NNtest is12276VBZbe ...12277:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12278LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] The12279DTthe difference12280NNdifference between12281INbetween the12282DTthe two12283CDtwo tests12284NNStest .12285SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]12286LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well12287UHWell ,12288,, the12289DTthe difference12290NNdifference between12291INbetween the12292DTthe two12293CDtwo is12294VBZbe that12295IN/thatthat we12296PPwe believe12297VVPbelieve ,12298,, and12299CCand what12300WPwhat ...12301:... what12302WPwhat this12303DTthis Court12304NPCourt has12305VHZhave taught12306VVNteach us12307PPus ,12308,, that12309IN/thatthat if12310INif you12311PPyou 're12312VBPbe exercising12313VVGexercise significant12314JJsignificant authority12315NNauthority under12316INunder the12317DTthe laws12318NNSlaw of12319INof the12320DTthe United12321NPUnited States12322NPSStates ,12323,, the12324DTthe laws12325NNSlaw enacted12326VVNenact by12327INby Congress12328NPCongress with12329INwith respect12330NNrespect to12331TOto the12332DTthe government12333NNgovernment ,12334,, affairs12335NNSaffair of12336INof the12337DTthe federal12338JJfederal government12339NNgovernment ,12340,, as12341RBas opposed12342VVNoppose to12343TOto purely12344RBpurely local12345JJlocal municipal12346NNmunicipal ,12347,, the12348DTthe ...12349:... the12350DTthe speed12351NNspeed limits12352NNSlimit ,12353,, the12354DTthe zoning12355NNzoning ...12356:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12357LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I12358PPI understand12359VVPunderstand ...12360:... I12361PPI understand12362VVPunderstand the12363DTthe test12364NNtest .12365SENT. My12366PP$my question12367NNquestion is12368VBZbe ,12369,, what12370WPwhat 's12371VBZbe the12372DTthe difference12373NNdifference between12374INbetween that12375WDTthat and12376CCand the12377DTthe question12378NNquestion asking12379VVGask whether12380INwhether the12381DTthe individual12382NNindividual or12383CCor the12384DTthe Board12385NPBoard is12386VBZbe acting12387VVGact primarily12388RBprimarily locally12389RBlocally or12390CCor primarily12391RBprimarily nationally12392RBnationally ?12393SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]12394LOC[MR. OLSON T.] It12395PPit ...12396:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12397LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] What12398WPWhat 's12399VBZbe the12400DTthe difference12401NNdifference ?12402SENT? What12403WPWhat 's12404VBZbe the12405DTthe delta12406NNdelta ?12407SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]12408LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The12409NPThe ...12410:... the12411DTthe delta12412NNdelta is12413VBZbe ,12414,, is12415VBZbe something12416NNsomething that12417WDTthat is12418VBZbe a12419DTa municipal12420JJmunicipal matter12421NNmatter ,12422,, is12423VBZbe it12424PPit ...12425:... have12426VHPhave to12427TOto do12428VVdo with12429INwith local12430JJlocal affairs12431NNSaffair ,12432,, speed12433NNspeed limits12434NNSlimit ,12435,, zoning12436NNzoning ,12437,, and12438CCand things12439NNSthing of12440INof that12441DTthat nature12442NNnature ,12443,, as12444RBas opposed12445VVNoppose to12446TOto federal12447JJfederal statutes12448NNSstatute that12449WDTthat deal12450VVPdeal with12451INwith a12452DTa national12453JJnational crisis12454NNcrisis .12455SENT. This12456DTthis was12457VBDbe a12458DTa national12459JJnational crisis12460NNcrisis ,12461,, a12462DTa national12463JJnational ...12464:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12465LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Could12466MDcould I12467PPI rephrase12468VVrephrase that12469IN/thatthat as12470INas asking12471VVGask whether12472INwhether the12473DTthe Board12474NPBoard was12475VBDbe acting12476VVGact primarily12477RBprimarily locally12478RBlocally or12479CCor primarily12480RBprimarily nationally12481RBnationally ?12482SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]12483LOC[MR. OLSON T.] It12484PPit is12485VBZbe ...12486:... the12487DTthe Board12488NPBoard is12489VBZbe acting12490VVGact primarily12491RBprimarily nationally12492RBnationally .12493SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12494LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Okay12495NPOkay .12496SENT. So12497RBso we12498PPwe do12499VVPdo agree12500VVagree on12501INon a12502DTa test12503NNtest then12504RBthen ?12505SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]12506LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Pardon12507NPPardon me12508PPme ?12509SENT? [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12510LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] So12511RBso then12512RBthen we12513PPwe do12514VVPdo agree12515VVagree on12516INon the12517DTthe test12518NNtest ,12519,, right12520RBright ,12521,, whether12522INwhether the12523DTthe Board12524NPBoard was12525VBDbe acting12526VVGact primarily12527RBprimarily locally12528RBlocally or12529CCor primarily12530RBprimarily nationally12531RBnationally ?12532SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]12533LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well12534UHWell ,12535,, that12536DTthat part12537NNpart of12538INof it12539PPit ,12540,, yes12541UHyes .12542SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]12543LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Okay12544NPOkay .12545SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]12546LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Because12547INbecause those12548DTthose ...12549:... what12550WPwhat this12551DTthis Court12552NPCourt has12553VHZhave said12554VVNsay repeatedly12555RBrepeatedly is12556VBZbe that12557IN/thatthat ,12558,, where12559WRBwhere there12560EXthere is12561VBZbe local12562JJlocal municipal12563JJmunicipal authority12564NNauthority ,12565,, Congress12566NPCongress has12567VHZhave the12568DTthe power12569NNpower under12570INunder Article12571NPArticle IV12572NPIV to12573TOto give12574VVgive government12575NNgovernment and12576CCand ...12577:... and12578CCand regulate12579VVregulate the12580DTthe affairs12581NNSaffair in12582INin municipalities12583NNSmunicipality .12584SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]12585LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] So12586RBso if12587INif it12588PPit 's12589VBZbe primarily12590RBprimarily ...12591:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12592LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Mr12593NPMr .12594SENT. Olson12595NPOlson ...12596:... [MR. OLSON T.]12597LOC[MR. OLSON T.] As12598INas ...12599:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12600LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...12601:... I12602PPI do12603VVPdo n't12604RBn't want12605VVwant you12606PPyou to12607TOto ignore12608VVignore the12609DTthe de12610FWde facto12611FWfacto officer12612NNofficer .12613SENT. But12614CCbut just12615RBjust to12616TOto finish12617VVfinish this12618DTthis ,12619,, there12620EXthere 's12621VBZbe this12622DTthis nuance12623NNnuance between12624INbetween you12625PPyou and12626CCand your12627PP$your adversaries12628NNSadversary on12629INon are12630VBPbe you12631PPyou dealing12632VVGdeal primarily12633RBprimarily with12634INwith a12635DTa local12636JJlocal matter12637NNmatter ?12638SENT? And12639CCand they12640PPthey would12641MDwould say12642VVsay dealing12643VVGdeal with12644INwith a12645DTa budget12646NNbudget ,12647,, dealing12648VVGdeal with12649INwith running12650VVGrun the12651DTthe government12652NNgovernment ,12653,, that12654WDTthat 's12655VBZbe all12656RBall local12657JJlocal .12658SENT. You12659PPyou are12660VBPbe attempting12661VVGattempt to12662TOto say12663VVsay something12664NNsomething different12665JJdifferent ,12666,, but12667CCbut I12668PPI 'm12669VBPbe not12670RBnot sure12671JJsure what12672WPwhat that12673DTthat difference12674NNdifference is12675VBZbe ,12676,, because12677RBbecause ,12678,, when12679WRBwhen they12680PPthey use12681VVPuse the12682DTthe words12683NNSword primarily12684RBprimarily local12685JJlocal matters12686NNSmatter ,12687,, that12688WDTthat 's12689VBZbe the12690DTthe way12691NNway I12692PPI understand12693VVPunderstand them12694PPthem to12695TOto be12696VBbe using12697VVGuse it12698PPit .12699SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]12700LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The12701NPThe ...12702:... the12703DTthe test12704NNtest ...12705:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12706LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] They12707PPthey ...12708:... they12709PPthey can12710MDcan obviously12711RBobviously correct12712VVcorrect me12713PPme if12714INif I12715PPI 'm12716VBPbe wrong12717JJwrong .12718SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]12719LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well12720UHWell ...12721:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12722LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But12723CCbut they12724PPthey 're12725VBPbe saying12726VVGsay this12727DTthis Board12728NPBoard is12729VBZbe dealing12730VVGdeal with12731INwith primarily12732RBprimarily local12733JJlocal matters12734NNSmatter because12735INbecause it12736PPit 's12737VBZbe dealing12738VVGdeal primarily12739RBprimarily with12740INwith a12741DTa budget12742NNbudget and12743CCand with12744INwith ...12745:... [MR. OLSON T.]12746LOC[MR. OLSON T.] And12747CCand that12748DTthat 's12749VBZbe not12750RBnot ...12751:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12752LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That12753DTthat ...12754:... that12755DTthat ...12756:... that12757WDTthat 's12758VBZbe ...12759:... okay12760JJokay .12761SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]12762LOC[MR. OLSON T.] With12763INwith all12764DTall due12765JJdue respect12766NNrespect ,12767,, you12768PPyou cannot12769MDcan say12770VVsay that12771IN/thatthat at12772INat the12773DTthe same12774JJsame time12775NNtime that12776IN/thatthat you12777PPyou 've12778VHPhave read12779VVNread the12780DTthe PROMESA12781NPPROMESA statute12782NNstatute itself12783PPitself .12784SENT. And12785CCand this12786DTthis Court12787NPCourt ...12788:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12789LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Well12790UHWell ,12791,, I12792PPI ...12793:... I12794PPI 've12795VHPhave read12796VVNread it12797PPit ,12798,, but12799CCbut that12800WDTthat does12801VVZdo n't12802RBn't mean12803VVmean I12804PPI know12805VVknow what12806WPwhat you12807PPyou 're12808VBPbe referring12809VVGrefer to12810TOto .12811SENT. Could12812MDcould you12813PPyou succinctly12814RBsuccinctly make12815VVPmake the12816DTthe ...12817:... the12818DTthe difference12819NNdifference between12820INbetween how12821WRBhow you12822PPyou view12823VVPview primarily12824RBprimarily dealing12825VVGdeal with12826INwith ...12827:... [MR. OLSON T.]12828LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well12829UHWell ...12830:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12831LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...12832:... in12833INin your12834PP$your way12835NNway and12836CCand the12837DTthe way12838NNway the12839DTthe other12840JJother side12841NNside does12842VVZdo ?12843SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]12844LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...12845:... the12846DTthe insolvency12847NNinsolvency of12848INof a12849DTa territory12850NNterritory of12851INof the12852DTthe United12853NPUnited States12854NPSStates is12855VBZbe not12856RBnot a12857DTa local12858JJlocal matter12859NNmatter .12860SENT. That12861DTthat 's12862VBZbe what12863WPwhat this12864DTthis Court12865NPCourt said12866VVDsay in12867INin the12868DTthe Limtiaco12869NPLimtiaco case12870NNcase in12871INin 200712872CD@card@ .12873SENT. The12874DTthe ...12875:... and12876CCand ...12877:... and12878CCand that12879DTthat 's12880VBZbe what12881WPwhat Congress12882NPCongress was12883VBDbe saying12884VVGsay when12885WRBwhen it12886PPit was12887VBDbe dealing12888VVGdeal with12889INwith the12890DTthe enactment12891NNenactment of12892INof this12893DTthis statute12894NNstatute .12895SENT. We12896PPwe have12897VHPhave a12898DTa fiscal12899JJfiscal catastrophe12900NNcatastrophe ,12901,, a12902DTa humanitarian12903JJhumanitarian crisis12904NNcrisis involving12905VVGinvolve millions12906NNSmillion of12907INof citizens12908NNScitizen ,12909,, 312910CD3 million12911CDmillion American12912JJAmerican citizens12913NNScitizen in12914INin Puerto12915NPPuerto Rico12916NPRico ,12917,, but12918CCbut citizens12919NNScitizen all12920RBall over12921INover the12922DTthe United12923NPUnited States12924NPSStates who12925WPwho are12926VBPbe owed12927VVNowe money12928NNmoney by12929INby the12930DTthe government12931NNgovernment of12932INof Puerto12933NPPuerto Rico12934NPRico or12935CCor agencies12936NNSagency of12937INof the12938DTthe government12939NNgovernment of12940INof Puerto12941NPPuerto ...12942:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12943LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So12944RBso ,12945,, Mr12946NPMr .12947SENT. Olson12948NPOlson ...12949:... [MR. OLSON T.]12950LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...12951:... Rico12952NPRico .12953SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]12954LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Counsel12955NPCounsel ,12956,, it12957PPit 's12958VBZbe just12959RBjust then12960RBthen ...12961:... it12962PPit ...12963:... it12964PPit 's12965VBZbe just12966RBjust a12967DTa question12968NNquestion of12969INof size12970NNsize .12971SENT. I12972PPI mean12973VVPmean ,12974,, if12975INif the12976DTthe same12977JJsame thing12978NNthing ,12979,, we12980PPwe 're12981VBPbe talking12982VVGtalk about12983RBabout not12984RBnot Puerto12985NPPuerto Rico12986NPRico ,12987,, but12988CCbut Ponce12989NPPonce ...12990:... see12991VVPsee ,12992,, I12993PPI do12994VVPdo n't12995RBn't know12996VVknow the12997DTthe pronunciation12998NNpronunciation ...12999:... Puerto13000NPPuerto Rico13001NPRico ,13002,, your13003PP$your position13004NNposition would13005MDwould be13006VBbe different13007JJdifferent ?13008SENT? Or13009CCor a13010DTa county13011NNcounty in13012INin Puerto13013NPPuerto Rico13014NPRico ?13015SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]13016LOC[MR. OLSON T.] I13017PPI think13018VVPthink that13019IN/thatthat it13020PPit 's13021VBZbe possible13022JJpossible that13023IN/thatthat you13024PPyou could13025MDcould find13026VVfind a13027DTa fiscal13028JJfiscal insolvency13029NNinsolvency situation13030NNsituation of13031INof a13032DTa small13033JJsmall enough13034JJenough unit13035NNunit of13036INof a13037DTa ...13038:... of13039INof a13040DTa portion13041NNportion of13042INof Puerto13043NPPuerto Rico13044NPRico where13045WRBwhere you13046PPyou would13047MDwould n't13048RBn't be13049VBbe talking13050VVGtalk about13051INabout this13052DTthis ,13053,, but13054CCbut Guam13055NPGuam ,13056,, which13057WDTwhich is13058VBZbe what13059WPwhat this13060DTthis Court13061NPCourt talked13062VVDtalk about13063RBabout in13064INin that13065DTthat case13066NNcase ,13067,, Limtiaco13068NPLimtiaco case13069NNcase ,13070,, was13071VBDbe 113072CD1 /13073SYM/ 400th13074JJ400th the13075DTthe size13076NNsize of13077INof Puerto13078NPPuerto Rico13079NPRico ,13080,, involving13081VVGinvolve that13082IN/thatthat tiny13083JJtiny fraction13084NNfraction of13085INof the13086DTthe significance13087NNsignificance of13088INof Puerto13089NPPuerto Rico13090NPRico .13091SENT. We13092PPwe 're13093VBPbe talking13094VVGtalk here13095RBhere about13096RBabout not13097RBnot just13098RBjust the13099DTthe size13100NNsize but13101CCbut the13102DTthe dimension13103NNdimension of13104INof the13105DTthe problem13106NNproblem ,13107,, the13108DTthe number13109NNnumber of13110INof citizens13111NNScitizen that13112WDTthat are13113VBPbe involved13114VVNinvolve ,13115,, the13116DTthe number13117NNnumber of13118INof creditors13119NNScreditor '13120POS' claims13121NNSclaim ,13122,, over13123INover 20013124CD@card@ claw-back13125NNclaw-back claims13126NNSclaim against13127INagainst financial13128JJfinancial institutions13129NNSinstitution throughout13130INthroughout the13131DTthe United13132NPUnited States13133NPStates that13134WDTthat are13135VBPbe being13136VBGbe pursued13137VVNpursue in13138INin federal13139JJfederal court13140NNcourt .13141SENT. This13142DTthis is13143VBZbe a13144DTa ...13145:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]13146LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So13147RBso would13148MDwould it13149PPit be13150VBbe right13151JJright to13152TOto say13153VVsay ,13154,, Mr13155NPMr .13156SENT. Olson13157NPOlson ,13158,, that13159WDTthat you13160PPyou view13161VVPview this13162DTthis statute13163NNstatute as13164INas essentially13165RBessentially a13166DTa statute13167NNstatute about13168INabout debt13169NNdebt restructuring13170NNrestructuring ?13171SENT? I13172PPI mean13173VVPmean ,13174,, it13175PPit has13176VHZhave other13177JJother aspects13178NNSaspect and13179CCand the13180DTthe Board13181NPBoard does13182VVZdo other13183JJother things13184NNSthing and13185CCand oversees13186VVZoversee Puerto13187NPPuerto Rican13188NPRican budgets13189NNSbudget going13190VVGgo forward13191RBforward ,13192,, but13193CCbut you13194PPyou 're13195VBPbe saying13196VVGsay that13197IN/thatthat what13198WPwhat we13199PPwe should13200MDshould do13201VVdo is13202VBZbe look13203VVlook at13204INat the13205DTthe statute13206NNstatute and13207CCand say13208VVPsay it13209PPit 's13210VBZbe about13211RBabout restructuring13212VVGrestructure a13213DTa bankrupt13214JJbankrupt territory13215NNterritory 's13216POS's debt13217NNdebt and13218CCand that13219IN/thatthat that13220WDTthat has13221VHZhave to13222TOto be13223VBbe viewed13224VVNview as13225INas national13226JJnational ?13227SENT? Is13228VBZbe that13229IN/thatthat the13230DTthe theory13231NNtheory ?13232SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]13233LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well13234UHWell ,13235,, that13236WDTthat is13237VBZbe part13238NNpart of13239INof the13240DTthe theory13241NNtheory .13242SENT. And13243CCand as13244RBas ...13245:... as13246INas the13247DTthe United13248NPUnited States13249NPSStates repeatedly13250RBrepeatedly said13251VVDsay with13252INwith respect13253NNrespect to13254TOto ,13255,, in13256INin the13257DTthe Freytag13258NPFreytag case13259NNcase ,13260,, the13261DTthe deputy13262JJdeputy solicitor13263NNsolicitor general13264NNgeneral was13265VBDbe asked13266VVNask a13267DTa question13268NNquestion about13269INabout what13270WPwhat if13271INif the13272DTthe governor13273NNgovernor of13274INof Puerto13275NPPuerto Rico13276NPRico was13277VBDbe appointed13278VVNappoint by13279INby Congress13280NPCongress or13281CCor a13282DTa federal13283JJfederal official13284NNofficial ?13285SENT? And13286CCand the13287DTthe response13288NNresponse from13289INfrom the13290DTthe federal13291JJfederal government13292NNgovernment was13293VBDbe that13294IN/thatthat would13295MDwould invoke13296VVinvoke in13297INin every13298DTevery case13299NNcase the13300DTthe Appointments13301NNSappointment Clause13302NNclause .13303SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13304LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Did13305VVDdo that13306IN/thatthat deputy13307JJdeputy solicitor13308NNsolicitor general13309NNgeneral prevail13310VVPprevail on13311INon that13312DTthat position13313NNposition ?13314SENT? [13315SYM[ LAUGHTER13316NNlaughter ]13317SYM] [MR. OLSON T.]13318LOC[MR. OLSON T.] That13319DTthat deputy13320JJdeputy solicitor13321NNsolicitor general13322NNgeneral made13323VVDmake a13324DTa beautiful13325JJbeautiful argument13326NNargument ,13327,, Mr13328NPMr .13329SENT. Chief13330NPChief Justice13331NPJustice .13332SENT. [13333SYM[ LAUGHTER13334NNlaughter ]13335SYM] [MR. OLSON T.]13336LOC[MR. OLSON T.] And13337CCand ...13338:... and13339CCand fortunately13340RBfortunately for13341INfor him13342PPhim ...13343:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13344LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] A13345DTa beautiful13346JJbeautiful losing13347VVGlose argument13348NNargument .13349SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]13350LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...13351:... the13352DTthe Court13353NPCourt did13354VVDdo not13355RBnot decide13356VVdecide that13357DTthat precise13358JJprecise case13359NNcase .13360SENT. But13361CCbut that13362DTthat ...13363:... but13364CCbut that13365DTthat argument13366NNargument that13367WDTthat was13368VBDbe made13369VVNmake is13370VBZbe the13371DTthe same13372JJsame argument13373NNargument that13374IN/thatthat the13375DTthe United13376NPUnited States13377NPSStates has13378VHZhave made13379VVNmake in13380INin 2213381CD@card@ OLC13382NPOLC in13383INin 197813384CD@card@ ,13385,, when13386WRBwhen it13387PPit was13388VBDbe talking13389VVGtalk about13390INabout Guam13391NPGuam ,13392,, in13393INin 3113394CD@card@ OLC13395NPOLC in13396INin the13397DTthe brief13398NNbrief in13399INin the13400DTthe Hechinger13401NPHechinger case13402NNcase ,13403,, which13404WDTwhich was13405VBDbe the13406DTthe follow-on13407NNfollow-on to13408TOto the13409DTthe Metropolitan13410NPMetropolitan Washington13411NPWashington Authority13412NPAuthority 's13413POS's case13414NNcase ,13415,, that13416WDTthat was13417VBDbe a13418DTa very13419JJvery ,13420,, very13421RBvery important13422JJimportant case13423NNcase .13424SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13425LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] If13426INif we13427PPwe conclude13428VVPconclude that13429IN/thatthat the13430DTthe powers13431NNSpower and13432CCand duties13433NNSduty here13434RBhere are13435VBPbe primarily13436RBprimarily local13437JJlocal ...13438:... and13439CCand I13440PPI know13441VVPknow you13442PPyou disagree13443VVPdisagree ...13444:... but13445CCbut ,13446,, if13447INif we13448PPwe conclude13449VVPconclude that13450IN/thatthat ,13451,, do13452VVdo you13453PPyou lose13454VVlose ?13455SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]13456LOC[MR. OLSON T.] The13457NPThe ...13458:... I13459PPI suspect13460VVPsuspect that13461IN/thatthat if13462INif there13463EXthere 's13464VBZbe ...13465:... if13466INif there13467EXthere 's13468VBZbe an13469DTan agency13470NNagency in13471INin Puerto13472NPPuerto Rico13473NPRico that13474WDTthat 's13475VBZbe dealing13476VVGdeal with13477INwith purely13478RBpurely local13479JJlocal problems13480NNSproblem ,13481,, like13482INlike the13483DTthe ...13484:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13485LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] You13486PPyou keep13487VVPkeep ...13488:... [MR. OLSON T.]13489LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...13490:... like13491INlike the13492DTthe article13493NNarticle ...13494:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13495LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...13496:... you13497PPyou keep13498VVPkeep saying13499VVGsay ...13500:... I13501PPI 'm13502VBPbe sorry13503JJsorry to13504TOto interrupt13505VVinterrupt .13506SENT. You13507PPyou keep13508VVPkeep saying13509VVGsay "13510``" purely13511RBpurely local13512JJlocal .13513SENT. "13514''" [MR. OLSON T.]13515LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well13516UHWell ,13517,, primarily13518RBprimarily ,13519,, I'll13520NPI'll ...13521:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13522LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Okay13523NPOkay .13524SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]13525LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...13526:... accept13527VVaccept that13528IN/thatthat ,13529,, primarily13530RBprimarily .13531SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13532LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] There13533EXthere 's13534VBZbe a13535DTa big13536JJbig difference13537NNdifference between13538INbetween ...13539:... [MR. OLSON T.]13540LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well13541UHwell ,13542,, there13543EXthere 's13544VBZbe a13545DTa big13546JJbig ...13547:... it13548PPit may13549MDmay be13550VBbe a13551DTa big13552JJbig difference13553NNdifference and13554CCand it13555PPit may13556MDmay be13557VBbe important13558JJimportant in13559INin this13560DTthis case13561NNcase .13562SENT. Palmore13563NPPalmore case13564NNcase was13565VBDbe talking13566VVGtalk about13567RBabout relative13568JJrelative ...13569:... it13570PPit was13571VBDbe n't13572RBn't purely13573RBpurely local13574JJlocal ,13575,, but13576CCbut it13577PPit was13578VBDbe primarily13579RBprimarily local13580JJlocal .13581SENT. The13582DTthe Court13583NPCourt used13584VVDuse exclusively13585RBexclusively ,13586,, but13587CCbut I13588PPI think13589VVPthink the13590DTthe Court13591NPCourt meant13592VVDmean in13593INin the13594DTthe Palmore13595NPPalmore case13596NNcase those13597DTthose courts13598NNScourt that13599WDTthat were13600VBDbe dealing13601VVGdeal with13602INwith problems13603NNSproblem in13604INin the13605DTthe District13606NPDistrict of13607INof Columbia13608NPColumbia involving13609VVGinvolve District13610NPDistrict of13611INof Columbia13612NPColumbia criminal13613JJcriminal laws13614NNSlaw .13615SENT. So13616RBso if13617INif your13618PP$your ...13619:... the13620DTthe focus13621NNfocus is13622VBZbe on13623INon that13624IN/thatthat ,13625,, of13626INof course13627NNcourse ,13628,, there13629EXthere are13630VBPbe state13631NNstate officials13632NNSofficial that13633WDTthat can13634MDcan enforce13635VVenforce federal13636JJfederal law13637NNlaw .13638SENT. That13639DTthat 's13640VBZbe always13641RBalways been13642VBNbe the13643DTthe case13644NNcase from13645INfrom the13646DTthe beginning13647NNbeginning of13648INof the13649DTthe Constitution13650NPConstitution .13651SENT. So13652RBso it13653PPit is13654VBZbe primarily13655RBprimarily what13656WPwhat 's13657VBZbe being13658VBGbe involved13659VVNinvolve here13660RBhere .13661SENT. This13662DTthis is13663VBZbe the13664DTthe ...13665:... the13666DTthe Congressional13667NPCongressional Budget13668NPBudget Office13669NPOffice itself13670PPitself looked13671VVDlook at13672INat this13673DTthis particular13674JJparticular statute13675NNstatute and13676CCand said13677VVDsay this13678DTthis is13679VBZbe a13680DTa federal13681JJfederal office13682NNoffice .13683SENT. The13684DTthe Lebron13685NPLebron case13686NNcase that13687WDTthat looked13688VVDlook at13689INat Amtrak13690NPAmtrak ...13691:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]13692LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Can13693MDcan I13694PPI just13695RBjust try13696VVPtry the13697DTthe question13698NNquestion again13699RBagain ?13700SENT? If13701INif we13702PPwe conclude13703VVPconclude it13704PPit 's13705VBZbe primarily13706RBprimarily local13707JJlocal ,13708,, do13709VVPdo you13710PPyou have13711VHPhave an13712DTan alternative13713JJalternative argument13714NNargument or13715CCor do13716VVdo you13717PPyou lose13718VVlose ?13719SENT? [MR. OLSON T.]13720LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well13721UHwell ,13722,, I13723PPI do13724VVPdo n't13725RBn't ...13726:... I13727PPI do13728VVPdo n't13729RBn't ...13730:... I13731PPI think13732VVPthink that13733IN/thatthat it13734PPit can13735MDcan 't13736RB't conceivably13737RBconceivably be13738VBbe thought13739VVNthink of13740INof as13741RBas primarily13742RBprimarily local13743JJlocal given13744VVNgive the13745DTthe scope13746NNscope of13747INof the13748DTthe authority13749NNauthority ,13750,, but13751CCbut I13752PPI 'm13753VBPbe imagining13754VVGimagine a13755DTa hypothetical13756JJhypothetical situation13757NNsituation where13758WRBwhere you13759PPyou might13760MDmight have13761VHhave a13762DTa small13763JJsmall unit13764NNunit of13765INof ...13766:... of13767INof government13768NNgovernment ,13769,, a13770DTa subdivision13771NNsubdivision of13772INof Puerto13773NPPuerto Rico13774NPRico that13775WDTthat was13776VBDbe purely13777RBpurely a13778DTa municipal13779JJmunicipal problem13780NNproblem ,13781,, yes13782UHyes ,13783,, that13784WDTthat could13785MDcould be13786VBbe a13787DTa ...13788:... that13789WDTthat could13790MDcould not13791RBnot invoke13792VVinvoke the13793DTthe Appointments13794NNSappointment Clause13795NNclause ,13796,, but13797CCbut ...13798:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]13799LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Mr13800NPMr .13801SENT. Olson13802NPOlson ,13803,, do13804VVPdo n't13805RBn't lose13806VVlose the13807DTthe de13808FWde facto13809FWfacto officer13810NNofficer argument13811NNargument .13812SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]13813LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Yes13814NPYes .13815SENT. The13816DTthe de13817FWde facto13818FWfacto ...13819:... this13820DTthis Court13821NPCourt decided13822VVDdecide 2413823CD@card@ years13824NNSyear ago13825RBago unanimously13826RBunanimously ,13827,, in13828INin an13829DTan opinion13830NNopinion by13831INby ...13832:... written13833VVNwrite by13834INby the13835DTthe then13836RBthen Chief13837JJchief Justice13838NPJustice ,13839,, that13840IN/thatthat when13841WRBwhen there13842EXthere is13843VBZbe a13844DTa decision13845NNdecision ,13846,, a13847DTa challenge13848NNchallenge ,13849,, a13850DTa timely13851JJtimely challenge13852NNchallenge to13853TOto an13854DTan Appointments13855NNSappointment Clause13856NNclause violation13857NNviolation ,13858,, one13859CDone who13860WPwho makes13861VVZmake ...13862:... to13863TOto use13864VVuse the13865DTthe words13866NNSword of13867INof that13868DTthat Court13869NPCourt ...13870:... one13871CDone who13872WPwho makes13873VVZmake a13874DTa timely13875JJtimely challenge13876NNchallenge to13877TOto the13878DTthe constitutional13879JJconstitutional validity13880NNvalidity of13881INof the13882DTthe appointment13883NNappointment of13884INof an13885DTan officer13886NNofficer who13887WPwho adjudicates13888VVZadjudicate his13889PP$his case13890NNcase and13891CCand ,13892,, legislative13893JJlegislative or13894CCor adjudicative13895JJadjudicative ...13896:... these13897DTthese are13898VBPbe Article13899NPArticle I13900NPI issues13901NNSissue ,13902,, so13903INso there13904EXthere really13905RBreally is13906VBZbe n't13907RBn't any13908DTany difference13909NNdifference there13910RBthere ...13911:... is13912VBZbe entitled13913VVNentitle to13914TOto a13915DTa decision13916NNdecision on13917INon the13918DTthe merits13919NNSmerit and13920CCand whatever13921WDTwhatever relief13922NNrelief may13923MDmay be13924VBbe appropriate13925JJappropriate .13926SENT. I13927PPI heard13928VVDhear the13929DTthe government13930NNgovernment say13931VVPsay just13932RBjust a13933DTa few13934JJfew minutes13935NNSminute ago13936RBago that13937IN/thatthat we13938PPwe 've13939VHPhave done13940VVNdo all13941PDTall these13942DTthese things13943NNSthing ,13944,, we13945PPwe 've13946VHPhave made13947VVNmake all13948PDTall those13949DTthose decisions13950NNSdecision ,13951,, so13952RBso put13953VVDput the13954DTthe Constitution13955NPConstitution aside13956RPaside ,13957,, let13958VVlet us13959PPus continue13960VVcontinue to13961TOto do13962VVdo it13963PPit .13964SENT. Let13965VVlet us13966PPus have13967VHPhave the13968DTthe fruits13969NNSfruit of13970INof the13971DTthe decisions13972NNSdecision that13973IN/thatthat we13974PPwe made13975VVDmake with13976INwith unconstitutional13977JJunconstitutional officers13978NNSofficer who13979WPwho could13980MDcould never13981RBnever have13982VHhave even13983RBeven filed13984VVNfile ...13985:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]13986LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I13987PPI think13988VVPthink that13989IN/thatthat they13990PPthey are13991VBPbe making13992VVGmake a13993DTa distinction13994NNdistinction between13995INbetween adjudicatory13996JJadjudicatory and13997CCand legislative13998JJlegislative decisions13999NNSdecision .14000SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]14001LOC[MR. OLSON T.] I14002PPI do14003VVPdo n't14004RBn't think14005VVthink that14006DTthat ...14007:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]14008LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] They14009PPthey seem14010VVPseem to14011TOto be14012VBbe saying14013VVGsay that14014IN/thatthat when14015WRBwhen it14016PPit comes14017VVZcome to14018TOto legislative14019JJlegislative officers14020NNSofficer ,14021,, that14022WDTthat we14023PPwe have14024VHPhave applied14025VVNapply the14026DTthe de14027FWde facto14028FWfacto officer14029NNofficer status14030NNstatus .14031SENT. In14032INin more14033JJRmore recent14034JJrecent times14035NNStime ,14036,, you14037PPyou 're14038VBPbe absolutely14039RBabsolutely right14040RBright ,14041,, with14042INwith adjudicatory14043JJadjudicatory officers14044NNSofficer ,14045,, we14046PPwe have14047VHPhave said14048VVNsay no14049RBno ,14050,, you14051PPyou have14052VHPhave to14053TOto give14054VVgive people14055NNSpeople a14056DTa new14057JJnew hearing14058NNhearing .14059SENT. So14060INso deal14061NNdeal with14062INwith that14063DTthat distinction14064NNdistinction ...14065:... [MR. OLSON T.]14066LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Well14067UHWell ...14068:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]14069LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...14070:... and14071CCand deal14072NNdeal with14073INwith why14074WRBwhy that14075DTthat 's14076VBZbe wrong14077JJwrong .14078SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]14079LOC[MR. OLSON T.] ...14080:... I14081PPI do14082VVPdo n't14083RBn't think14084VVthink that14085IN/thatthat there14086EXthere is14087VBZbe a14088DTa valid14089JJvalid distinction14090NNdistinction in14091INin ...14092:... in14093INin a14094DTa vacuum14095NNvacuum between14096INbetween an14097DTan adjudicatory14098JJadjudicatory process14099NNprocess .14100SENT. Look14101VVlook at14102INat the14103DTthe Lucia14104NPLucia case14105NNcase ,14106,, was14107VBDbe an14108DTan Administrative14109NPAdministrative Law14110NPLaw Judge14111NPJudge that14112WDTthat was14113VBDbe exercising14114VVGexercise what14115WPwhat the14116DTthe Court14117NNcourt perceived14118VVNperceive as14119INas partially14120RBpartially adjudicative14121JJadjudicative problems14122NNSproblem ,14123,, but14124CCbut also14125RBalso conducting14126VVGconduct Article14127NPArticle I14128NPI activities14129NNSactivity ,14130,, enforcing14131VVGenforce the14132DTthe laws14133NNSlaw of14134INof the14135DTthe United14136NPUnited States14137NPSStates .14138SENT. And14139CCand this14140DTthis agency14141NNagency has14142VHZhave that14143DTthat same14144JJsame authority14145NNauthority .14146SENT. It14147PPit overlaps14148VVZoverlap both14149DTboth .14150SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]14151LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But14152CCbut the14153DTthe Ryder14154NPRyder case14155NNcase ,14156,, on14157INon which14158WDTwhich you14159PPyou placed14160VVDplace such14161JJsuch reliance14162NNreliance ,14163,, it14164PPit ...14165:... it14166PPit was14167VBDbe qualified14168VVNqualify .14169SENT. It14170PPit said14171VVDsay the14172DTthe defendant14173NNdefendant could14174MDcould object14175VVobject to14176TOto the14177DTthe mode14178NNmode of14179INof appointment14180NNappointment of14181INof a14182DTa judge14183NNjudge who14184WPwho adjudicates14185VVZadjudicate his14186PP$his case14187NNcase .14188SENT. And14189CCand this14190DTthis Board14191NPBoard is14192VBZbe not14193RBnot adjudicating14194VVGadjudicate any14195DTany cases14196NNScase .14197SENT. The14198DTthe ...14199:... the14200DTthe federal14201JJfederal district14202NNdistrict court14203NNcourt is14204VBZbe .14205SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]14206LOC[MR. OLSON T.] Justice14207NPJustice Ginsburg14208NPGinsburg ,14209,, I14210PPI would14211MDwould submit14212VVsubmit that14213IN/thatthat the14214DTthe ...14215:... this14216DTthis Board14217NPBoard is14218VBZbe both14219DTboth adjudicating14220VVGadjudicate and14221CCand enforcing14222VVGenforce the14223DTthe laws14224NNSlaw in14225INin the14226DTthe same14227JJsame sense14228NNsense ,14229,, and14230CCand has14231VHZhave many14232JJmany of14233INof the14234DTthe same14235JJsame powers14236NNSpower that14237IN/thatthat the14238DTthe administrative14239JJadministrative law14240NNlaw judge14241NNjudge had14242VHDhave in14243INin the14244DTthe Lucia14245NPLucia case14246NNcase ,14247,, and14248CCand so14249RBso that14250IN/thatthat that14251DTthat distinction14252NNdistinction simply14253RBsimply does14254VVZdo n't14255RBn't hold14256VVhold up14257RPup .14258SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]14259LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] It14260PPit was14261VBDbe acting14262VVGact on14263INon behalf14264NNbehalf of14265INof the14266DTthe debtor14267JJdebtor agency14268NNagency in14269INin Puerto14270NPPuerto Rico14271NPRico .14272SENT. They14273PPthey ...14274:... it14275PPit 's14276VBZbe acting14277VVGact as14278INas a14279DTa kind14280NNkind of14281INof a14282DTa petitioner14283NNpetitioner .14284SENT. It14285PPit 's14286VBZbe not14287RBnot an14288DTan adjudicator14289NNadjudicator .14290SENT. [MR. OLSON T.]14291LOC[MR. OLSON T.] That14292DTthat 's14293VBZbe one14294CDone of14295INof the14296DTthe ...14297:... one14298CDone small14299JJsmall part14300NNpart of14301INof what14302WPwhat PROMESA14303NPPROMESA does14304VVZdo .14305SENT. That14306DTthat has14307VHZhave to14308TOto do14309VVdo with14310INwith 165,00014311CD@card@ claims14312NNSclaim .14313SENT. It14314PPit does14315VVZdo n't14316RBn't have14317VHhave to14318TOto do14319VVdo with14320INwith overturning14321VVGoverturn the14322DTthe ...14323:... the14324DTthe budget14325NNbudget ,14326,, changing14327VVGchange the14328DTthe financial14329JJfinancial structure14330NNstructure of14331INof Puerto14332NPPuerto Rico14333NPRico ,14334,, suing14335VVGsue in14336INin ...14337:... in14338INin federal14339JJfederal courts14340NNScourt citizens14341NNScitizen of14342INof the14343DTthe United14344NPUnited States14345NPSStates outside14346NNoutside of14347INof Puerto14348NPPuerto Rico14349NPRico in14350INin connection14351NNconnection with14352INwith financial14353JJfinancial claims14354NNSclaim ,14355,, claw-back14356NNclaw-back claims14357NNSclaim ,14358,, they14359PPthey call14360VVPcall them14361PPthem in14362INin the14363DTthe financial14364JJfinancial insolvency14365NNinsolvency concept14366NNconcept .14367SENT. If14368INif one14369CDone were14370VBDbe to14371TOto look14372VVlook at14373INat all14374DTall of14375INof the14376DTthe authorities14377NNSauthority ,14378,, and14379CCand I14380PPI was14381VBDbe ...14382:... have14383VHPhave to14384TOto finish14385VVfinish with14386INwith the14387DTthe point14388NNpoint that14389IN/thatthat these14390DTthese officials14391NNSofficial are14392VBPbe appointed14393VVNappoint by14394INby the14395DTthe President14396NPPresident of14397INof the14398DTthe United14399NPUnited States14400NPSStates ,14401,, an14402DTan officer14403NNofficer of14404INof the14405DTthe United14406NPUnited States14407NPStates ,14408,, removable14409JJremovable by14410INby the14411DTthe President14412NPPresident ,14413,, and14414CCand that14415IN/thatthat what14416WPwhat this14417DTthis Court14418NPCourt said14419VVDsay in14420INin the14421DTthe Bowsher14422NPBowsher case14423NNcase ,14424,, that14425WDTthat means14426VVZmean that14427IN/thatthat that14428DTthat 's14429VBZbe the14430DTthe official14431NNofficial that14432IN/thatthat they14433PPthey must14434MDmust fear14435VVfear and14436CCand therefore14437RBtherefore obey14438VVPobey ,14439,, and14440CCand is14441VBZbe supervised14442VVNsupervise in14443INin Section14444NPSection 214814445CD@card@ ,14446,, 212114447CD@card@ ,14448,, 212714449CD@card@ ,14450,, 1914451CD@card@ 214314452CD@card@ .14453SENT. These14454DTthese are14455VBPbe reports14456NNSreport ,14457,, recommendations14458NNSrecommendation ,14459,, responsibilities14460NNSresponsibility that14461IN/thatthat the14462DTthe oversight14463NNoversight board14464NNboard must14465MDmust constantly14466RBconstantly give14467VVgive to14468TOto officials14469NNSofficial of14470INof the14471DTthe United14472NPUnited States14473NPStates and14474CCand ,14475,, therefore14476RBtherefore ,14477,, supervision14478NNsupervision .14479SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]14480LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank14481VVthank you14482PPyou ,14483,, counsel14484NNcounsel .14485SENT. Ms14486NNMs .14487SENT. Mendez-Colberg14488NPMendez-Colberg .14489SENT.

[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]14490LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Mr14491NPMr .14492SENT. Chief14493NPChief Justice14494NPJustice ,14495,, and14496CCand may14497MDmay it14498PPit please14499VVplease the14500DTthe Court14501NPCourt :14502:: I14503PPI would14504MDwould like14505VVlike to14506TOto address14507VVaddress the14508DTthe issue14509NNissue of14510INof the14511DTthe Insular14512JJinsular Cases14513NNScase ,14514,, the14515DTthe remedy14516NNremedy ,14517,, and14518CCand also14519RBalso some14520DTsome of14521INof the14522DTthe questions14523NNSquestion ...14524:... the14525DTthe questions14526NNSquestion of14527INof the14528DTthe Court14529NPCourt .14530SENT. If14531INif we14532PPwe stand14533VVPstand in14534INin front14535NNfront of14536INof this14537DTthis building14538NNbuilding ,14539,, we14540PPwe will14541MDwill see14542VVsee the14543DTthe words14544NNSword "14545``" equal14546JJequal justice14547NNjustice under14548INunder law14549NNlaw .14550SENT. "14551``" The14552DTthe Insular14553JJinsular Cases14554NNScase stretch14555VVPstretch that14556IN/thatthat tenet14557NNtenet into14558INinto its14559PP$its breaking14560JJbreaking point14561NNpoint .14562SENT. The14563DTthe court-made14564JJcourt-made doctrine14565NNdoctrine of14566INof territorial14567JJterritorial incorporation14568NNincorporation means14569VVZmean that14570IN/thatthat when14571WRBwhen my14572PP$my client14573NNclient ,14574,, and14575CCand even14576RBeven myself14577PPmyself ,14578,, return14579VVreturn to14580TOto Puerto14581NPPuerto Rico14582NPRico ,14583,, we14584PPwe will14585MDwill have14586VHhave a14587DTa lesser14588JJRlesser set14589NNset of14590INof constitutional14591JJconstitutional rights14592NNSright than14593INthan what14594WPwhat we14595PPwe have14596VHPhave standing14597NNstanding here14598RBhere today14599NNtoday .14600SENT. On14601INon the14602DTthe other14603JJother hand14604NNhand ,14605,, the14606DTthe First14607NPFirst Circuit14608NPCircuit decided14609VVDdecide that14610IN/thatthat my14611PP$my clients14612NNSclient suffered14613VVDsuffer a14614DTa constitutional14615JJconstitutional injury14616NNinjury ,14617,, but14618CCbut still14619RBstill they14620PPthey were14621VBDbe left14622VVNleave without14623INwithout a14624DTa remedy14625NNremedy .14626SENT. Equal14627JJequal justice14628NNjustice under14629INunder law14630NNlaw should14631MDshould mean14632VVmean the14633DTthe same14634JJsame thing14635NNthing here14636RBhere in14637INin D14638NPD .14639SENT. C14640LSc .14641SENT. than14642INthan in14643INin Puerto14644NPPuerto Rico14645NPRico .14646SENT. It14647PPit should14648MDshould reject14649VVreject ideas14650NNSidea grounded14651VVNground on14652INon class14653NNclass ...14654:... it14655PPit should14656MDshould reject14657VVreject classifications14658NNSclassification grounded14659VVNground in14660INin ideas14661NNSidea of14662INof alien14663JJalien races14664NNSrace and14665CCand savage14666JJsavage people14667NNSpeople .14668SENT. It14669PPit should14670MDshould also14671RBalso mean14672VVmean that14673IN/thatthat when14674WRBwhen there14675EXthere is14676VBZbe a14677DTa constitutional14678JJconstitutional injury14679NNinjury ,14680,, justice14681NNjustice requires14682VVZrequire a14683DTa remedy14684NNremedy .14685SENT. Now14686RBnow ,14687,, in14688INin this14689DTthis case14690NNcase ,14691,, the14692DTthe ...14693:... the14694DTthe First14695NPFirst Circuit14696NPCircuit stated14697VVDstate correctly14698RBcorrectly that14699IN/thatthat the14700DTthe Insular14701JJinsular Cases14702NNScase hover14703VVPhover like14704INlike a14705DTa dark14706JJdark cloud14707NNcloud over14708INover this14709DTthis case14710NNcase .14711SENT. And14712CCand it14713PPit is14714VBZbe true14715JJtrue ,14716,, because14717INbecause the14718DTthe opposing14719JJopposing parties14720NNSparty have14721VHPhave been14722VBNbe relying14723VVGrely on14724INon the14725DTthe Insular14726JJinsular Cases14727NNScase since14728INsince the14729DTthe beginning14730NNbeginning of14731INof the14732DTthe proceedings14733NNSproceeding to14734TOto establish14735VVestablish that14736IN/thatthat even14737RBeven the14738DTthe structural14739JJstructural provisions14740NNSprovision of14741INof the14742DTthe Constitution14743NPConstitution do14744VVPdo n't14745RBn't apply14746VVapply to14747TOto the14748DTthe people14749NNSpeople of14750INof Puerto14751NPPuerto Rico14752NPRico because14753INbecause ...14754:... [JUSTICE BREYER]14755LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I14756PPI think14757VVPthink here14758RBhere ...14759:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]14760LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I14761PPI understood14762VVDunderstand ...14763:... [JUSTICE BREYER]14764LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] ...14765:... everybody14766NNeverybody was14767VBDbe ...14768:... everybody14769NNeverybody was14770VBDbe agreeing14771VVGagree that14772IN/thatthat the14773DTthe Article14774NNarticle I14775PPI ...14776:... Article14777NPArticle II14778NPII does14779VVZdo apply14780VVapply .14781SENT. And14782CCand so14783RBso whether14784INwhether you14785PPyou have14786VHPhave the14787DTthe Insular14788JJinsular Cases14789NNScase or14790CCor not14791RBnot ,14792,, and14793CCand I14794PPI agree14795VVPagree they14796PPthey 're14797VBPbe a14798DTa dark14799JJdark cloud14800NNcloud ,14801,, but14802CCbut the14803DTthe ...14804:... the14805DTthe ...14806:... the14807DTthe ...14808:... it14809PPit does14810VVZdo n't14811RBn't matter14812VVmatter here14813RBhere because14814INbecause the14815DTthe provision14816NNprovision of14817INof the14818DTthe Constitution14819NPConstitution does14820VVZdo apply14821VVapply .14822SENT. And14823CCand I14824PPI thought14825VVDthink what14826WPwhat was14827VBDbe more14828JJRmore ,14829,, which14830WDTwhich I14831PPI 've14832VHPhave been14833VBNbe trying14834VVGtry to14835TOto work14836VVwork out14837RPout ,14838,, and14839CCand you14840PPyou may14841MDmay have14842VHhave looked14843VVNlook into14844INinto this14845DTthis ,14846,, is14847VBZbe what14848WPwhat about14849INabout the14850DTthe Federal14851NPFederal Relations14852NPSRelations Act14853NPAct ?14854SENT? You14855PPyou see14856VVPsee ,14857,, if14858INif ...14859:... if14860INif ,14861,, in14862INin fact14863NNfact ,14864,, you14865PPyou ...14866:... you14867PPyou would14868MDwould be14869VBbe the14870DTthe one14871CDone who14872WPwho might14873MDmight have14874VHhave thought14875VVNthink of14876INof this14877DTthis .14878SENT. But14879CCbut it14880PPit does14881VVZdo give14882VVgive these14883DTthese powers14884NNSpower to14885TOto deal14886VVdeal ,14887,, and14888CCand the14889DTthe deal14890NNdeal is14891VBZbe the14892DTthe legislature14893NNlegislature of14894INof Puerto14895NPPuerto Rico14896NPRico and14897CCand the14898DTthe governor14899NNgovernor do14900VVPdo this14901DTthis .14902SENT. But14903CCbut there14904EXthere was14905VBDbe a14906DTa reservation14907NNreservation .14908SENT. There14909EXthere was14910VBDbe a14911DTa reservation14912NNreservation for14913INfor the14914DTthe indebtedness14915NNindebtedness .14916SENT. And14917CCand that14918DTthat reservation14919NNreservation was14920VBDbe eventually14921RBeventually repealed14922VVNrepeal in14923INin '14924''' 6114925CD@card@ .14926SENT. And14927CCand when14928WRBwhen it14929PPit was14930VBDbe repealed14931VVNrepeal ,14932,, the14933DTthe legislature14934NNlegislature passed14935VVDpass a14936DTa ...14937:... they14938PPthey passed14939VVDpass a14940DTa constitutional14941JJconstitutional amendment14942NNamendment in14943INin Puerto14944NPPuerto Rico14945NPRico promising14946VVGpromise that14947IN/thatthat they14948PPthey would14949MDwould pay14950VVpay creditors14951NNScreditor and14952CCand that14953IN/thatthat they14954PPthey had14955VHDhave some14956DTsome priorities14957NNSpriority and14958CCand so14959RBso forth14960RBforth .14961SENT. Now14962RBnow is14963VBZbe that14964IN/thatthat relevant14965JJrelevant ?14966SENT? I14967PPI 've14968VHPhave begun14969VVNbegin to14970TOto think14971VVthink that14972IN/thatthat the14973DTthe partnership14974NNpartnership ,14975,, the14976DTthe Estado14977NPEstado Libre14978NPLibre Asociado14979NPAsociado ,14980,, is14981VBZbe ...14982:... is14983VBZbe ...14984:... is14985VBZbe more14986RBRmore served14987VVNserve by14988INby considering14989VVGconsider this14990DTthis a14991DTa local14992JJlocal law14993NNlaw than14994INthan considering14995VVGconsider it14996PPit a14997DTa federal14998JJfederal law14999NNlaw ,15000,, because15001INbecause if15002INif a15003DTa ...15004:... if15005INif it15006PPit 's15007VBZbe a15008DTa federal15009JJfederal law15010NNlaw ,15011,, it15012PPit really15013RBreally is15014VBZbe hard15015JJhard to15016TOto reconcile15017VVreconcile with15018INwith the15019DTthe FRA15020NNFRA ,15021,, but15022CCbut not15023RBnot so15024RBso hard15025JJhard if15026INif it15027PPit 's15028VBZbe a15029DTa local15030JJlocal law15031NNlaw .15032SENT. Have15033VHPhave you15034PPyou thought15035VVNthink about15036INabout it15037PPit at15038INat all15039DTall ?15040SENT? If15041INif you15042PPyou have15043VHPhave n't15044RBn't thought15045VVNthink of15046INof it15047PPit ,15048,, forget15049VVforget it15050PPit .15051SENT. [15052SYM[ LAUGHTER15053NNlaughter ]15054SYM] [JUSTICE BREYER]15055LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I15056PPI 'm15057VBPbe just15058RBjust ...15059:... I'm15060NPI'm ...15061:... I'm15062NPI'm ...15063:... I'm15064NPI'm ...15065:... I'm15066NNI'm ...15067:... I15068PPI have15069VHPhave a15070DTa tough15071JJtough problem15072NNproblem in15073INin my15074PP$my mind15075NNmind on15076INon that15077DTthat .15078SENT. And15079CCand if15080INif you15081PPyou have15082VHPhave thought15083VVNthink of15084INof it15085PPit ,15086,, I15087PPI 'd15088MDwould appreciate15089VVappreciate what15090WPwhat you15091PPyou think15092VVPthink .15093SENT. [MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15094LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Well15095UHWell ,15096,, Your15097PP$your Honor15098NPHonor ,15099,, we15100PPwe would15101MDwould forget15102VVforget about15103INabout it15104PPit ,15105,, but15106CCbut the15107DTthe problem15108NNproblem here15109RBhere is15110VBZbe that15111IN/thatthat ,15112,, actually15113RBactually ,15114,, what15115WPwhat Congress15116NPCongress did15117VVDdo was15118VBDbe to15119TOto ,15120,, yes15121UHyes ,15122,, say15123VVPsay that15124IN/thatthat this15125DTthis ...15126:... that15127IN/thatthat this15128DTthis are15129VBPbe territorial15130JJterritorial officers15131NNSofficer ,15132,, but15133CCbut it15134PPit actually15135RBactually gave15136VVDgive this15137DTthis ...15138:... the15139DTthe oversight15140NNoversight board15141NNboard powers15142NNSpower that15143WDTthat are15144VBPbe not15145RBnot necessarily15146RBnecessarily what15147WPwhat power15148NNpower ...15149:... what15150WPwhat the15151DTthe powers15152NNSpower of15153INof a15154DTa ...15155:... of15156INof a15157DTa territorial15158JJterritorial officer15159NNofficer are15160VBPbe considered15161VVNconsider to15162TOto be15163VBbe .15164SENT. They15165PPthey ...15166:... the15167DTthe oversight15168NNoversight board15169NNboard has15170VHZhave the15171DTthe authority15172NNauthority ,15173,, and15174CCand as15175INas Mr15176NPMr .15177SENT. Olson15178NPOlson mentioned15179VVDmention ,15180,, has15181VHZhave the15182DTthe authority15183NNauthority to15184TOto file15185VVfile this15186DTthis bankruptcy15187NNbankruptcy proceedings15188NNSproceeding ,15189,, which15190WDTwhich is15191VBZbe a15192DTa federal15193JJfederal power15194NNpower ,15195,, on15196INon behalf15197NNbehalf of15198INof the15199DTthe government15200NNgovernment .15201SENT. But15202CCbut ,15203,, also15204RBalso ,15205,, we15206PPwe see15207VVPsee that15208IN/thatthat they15209PPthey have15210VHPhave the15211DTthe authority15212NNauthority to15213TOto impair15214VVimpair contracts15215NNScontract ...15216:... which15217WDTwhich is15218VBZbe something15219NNsomething that15220WDTthat was15221VBDbe n't15222RBn't mentioned15223VVNmention before15224INbefore ...15225:... impair15226VVimpair contracts15227NNScontract even15228RBeven outside15229JJoutside of15230INof the15231DTthe ...15232:... of15233INof the15234DTthe scope15235NNscope of15236INof the15237DTthe bankruptcy15238NNbankruptcy proceedings15239NNSproceeding ,15240,, which15241WDTwhich is15242VBZbe in15243INin the15244DTthe Title15245NPTitle II15246NPII ...15247:... II15248NPII of15249INof PROMESA15250NPPROMESA .15251SENT. If15252INif the15253DTthe Board15254NPBoard understands15255VVZunderstand that15256IN/thatthat a15257DTa contract15258NNcontract may15259MDmay ...15260:... that15261IN/thatthat the15262DTthe government15263NNgovernment ...15264:... by15265INby the15266DTthe government15267NNgovernment of15268INof Puerto15269NPPuerto Rico15270NPRico with15271INwith other15272JJother parties15273NNSparty is15274VBZbe inconsistent15275JJinconsistent with15276INwith the15277DTthe provisions15278NNSprovision of15279INof PROMESA15280NPPROMESA ,15281,, it15282PPit can15283MDcan ...15284:... it15285PPit can15286MDcan ...15287:... it15288PPit can15289MDcan even15290RBeven prevent15291VVprevent the15292DTthe execution15293NNexecution of15294INof those15295DTthose ...15296:... of15297INof those15298DTthose contracts15299NNScontract .15300SENT. So15301RBso that15302DTthat is15303VBZbe a15304DTa very15305RBvery significant15306JJsignificant power15307NNpower among15308INamong the15309DTthe other15310JJother powers15311NNSpower that15312IN/thatthat the15313DTthe oversight15314NNoversight board15315NNboard has15316VHZhave that15317RBthat not15318RBnot even15319RBeven the15320DTthe ...15321:... the15322DTthe government15323NNgovernment ,15324,, the15325DTthe local15326JJlocal government15327NNgovernment of15328INof Puerto15329NPPuerto Rico15330NPRico ,15331,, has15332VHZhave .15333SENT. Now15334RBnow I15335PPI do15336VVPdo want15337VVwant to15338TOto ...15339:... to15340TOto ...15341:... to15342TOto ...15343:... to15344TOto stress15345VVstress on15346INon the15347DTthe issue15348NNissue of15349INof the15350DTthe Insular15351JJinsular Cases15352NNScase ,15353,, because15354INbecause it15355PPit is15356VBZbe important15357JJimportant for15358INfor the15359DTthe people15360NNSpeople of15361INof Puerto15362NPPuerto Rico15363NPRico and15364CCand for15365INfor my15366PP$my clients15367NNSclient .15368SENT. This15369DTthis is15370VBZbe a15371DTa ...15372:... a15373DTa doctrine15374NNdoctrine that15375WDTthat has15376VHZhave been15377VBNbe ,15378,, well15379RBwell ,15380,, 11815381CD@card@ years15382NNSyear ,15383,, that15384WDTthat it15385PPit ...15386:... that15387WDTthat has15388VHZhave been15389VBNbe ...15390:... that15391WDTthat has15392VHZhave been15393VBNbe good15394JJgood law15395NNlaw .15396SENT. And15397CCand ,15398,, here15399RBhere ,15400,, I15401PPI want15402VVPwant to15403TOto stress15404VVstress that15405IN/thatthat it15406PPit is15407VBZbe a15408DTa ...15409:... it15410PPit is15411VBZbe a15412DTa matter15413NNmatter of15414INof overruling15415VVGoverrule the15416DTthe Insular15417JJinsular Cases15418NNScase ,15419,, and15420CCand the15421DTthe Doctrine15422NNdoctrine of15423INof Territorial15424JJterritorial Incorporation15425NNincorporation ,15426,, it15427PPit is15428VBZbe a15429DTa matter15430NNmatter of15431INof constitutional15432JJconstitutional and15433CCand law15434NNlaw ,15435,, but15436CCbut also15437RBalso a15438DTa matter15439NNmatter of15440INof who15441WPwho the15442DTthe United15443NPUnited States15444NPSStates is15445VBZbe as15446RBas a15447DTa nation15448NNnation .15449SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]15450LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well15451UHWell ,15452,, but15453CCbut Justice15454NPJustice ...15455:... as15456INas Justice15457NPJustice Breyer15458NPBreyer has15459VHZhave pointed15460VVNpoint out15461RPout ,15462,, none15463NNnone of15464INof the15465DTthe other15466JJother parties15467NNSparty rely15468VVPrely on15469INon the15470DTthe Insular15471JJinsular Cases15472NNScase in15473INin any15474DTany way15475NNway .15476SENT. So15477RBso it15478PPit would15479MDwould be15480VBbe very15481RBvery unusual15482JJunusual for15483INfor us15484PPus to15485TOto address15486VVaddress them15487PPthem in15488INin this15489DTthis case15490NNcase ,15491,, would15492MDwould n't15493RBn't it15494PPit ?15495SENT? [MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15496LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Well15497UHWell ,15498,, Your15499PP$your Honor15500NPHonor ,15501,, they15502PPthey relied15503VVDrely on15504INon the15505DTthe Insular15506JJinsular Cases15507NNScase since15508INsince the15509DTthe beginning15510NNbeginning of15511INof the15512DTthe proceedings15513NNSproceeding .15514SENT. Actually15515RBactually ,15516,, the15517DTthe ...15518:... the15519DTthe unsecured15520JJunsecured creditor15521NNcreditor ...15522:... creditors15523NNScreditor are15524VBPbe still15525RBstill relying15526VVGrely on15527INon the15528DTthe Insular15529JJinsular Cases15530NNScase at15531INat this15532DTthis point15533NNpoint .15534SENT. Now15535RBnow it15536PPit is15537VBZbe very15538RBvery convenient15539JJconvenient for15540INfor the15541DTthe other15542JJother parties15543NNSparty to15544TOto not15545RBnot ...15546:... to15547TOto rely15548VVrely on15549INon the15550DTthe Insular15551JJinsular Cases15552NNScase in15553INin the15554DTthe lower15555JJRlow courts15556NNScourt ,15557,, where15558WRBwhere there15559EXthere is15560VBZbe no15561DTno authority15562NNauthority to15563TOto overrule15564VVoverrule those15565DTthose cases15566NNScase ,15567,, but15568CCbut that15569DTthat ...15570:... but15571CCbut then15572RBthen when15573WRBwhen we15574PPwe come15575VVPcome before15576INbefore this15577DTthis Court15578NPCourt to15579TOto say15580VVsay that15581IN/thatthat they15582PPthey are15583VBPbe not15584RBnot relevant15585JJrelevant .15586SENT. Still15587RBstill ,15588,, as15589INas I15590PPI ...15591:... as15592INas I15593PPI was15594VBDbe about15595RBabout to15596TOto mention15597VVmention ,15598,, the15599DTthe Insular15600JJinsular Cases15601NNScase comply15602VVcomply with15603INwith all15604DTall of15605INof the15606DTthe factors15607NNSfactor that15608IN/thatthat this15609DTthis ...15610:... that15611IN/thatthat this15612DTthis Court15613NNcourt established15614VVNestablish in15615INin ...15616:... in15617INin Janus15618NPJanus ,15619,, especially15620RBespecially the15621DTthe quality15622NNquality of15623INof the15624DTthe reasoning15625NNreasoning ,15626,, because15627INbecause it15628PPit is15629VBZbe based15630VVNbase purely15631RBpurely on15632INon racial15633JJracial considerations15634NNSconsideration ,15635,, to15636TOto say15637VVsay that15638IN/thatthat some15639DTsome provisions15640NNSprovision of15641INof the15642DTthe Constitution15643NPConstitution do15644VVPdo n't15645RBn't apply15646VVapply to15647TOto the15648DTthe unincorporated15649JJunincorporated territories15650NNSterritory because15651INbecause they15652PPthey are15653VBPbe of15654INof a15655DTa different15656JJdifferent race15657NNrace .15658SENT. That15659DTthat 's15660VBZbe the15661DTthe ...15662:... that15663WDTthat 's15664VBZbe the15665DTthe root15666NNroot of15667INof that15668DTthat doctrine15669NNdoctrine .15670SENT. Now15671RBnow ,15672,, here15673RBhere ...15674:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]15675LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I15676PPI thought15677VVDthink the15678DTthe argument15679NNargument was15680VBDbe that15681IN/thatthat the15682DTthe Appointments15683NNSappointment Clause15684NNclause does15685VVZdo apply15686VVapply to15687TOto Puerto15688NPPuerto Rico15689NPRico ,15690,, and15691CCand the15692DTthe question15693NNquestion is15694VBZbe simply15695RBsimply whether15696INwhether it15697PPit 's15698VBZbe implicated15699VVNimplicate on15700INon these15701DTthese particular15702JJparticular facts15703NNSfact with15704INwith respect15705NNrespect to15706TOto this15707DTthis particular15708JJparticular agency15709NNagency ?15710SENT? [MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15711LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Yes15712NPYes ,15713,, Your15714PP$your Honor15715NPHonor .15716SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]15717LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] So15718INso I15719PPI ...15720:... I15721PPI guess15722VVPguess ,15723,, again15724RBagain ,15725,, I15726PPI just15727RBjust do15728VVPdo n't15729RBn't see15730VVsee the15731DTthe pertinence15732NNpertinence of15733INof the15734DTthe ...15735:... of15736INof the15737DTthe Insular15738JJinsular Cases15739NNScase .15740SENT. [MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15741LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Well15742UHWell ,15743,, as15744INas I15745PPI ...15746:... as15747INas I15748PPI mentioned15749VVDmention ,15750,, and15751CCand also15752RBalso ...15753:... also15754RBalso ,15755,, last15756JJlast term15757NNterm ,15758,, this15759DTthis Court15760NPCourt went15761VVDgo ahead15762RBahead and15763CCand overruled15764VVDoverrule the15765DTthe Korematsu15766NPKorematsu case15767NNcase .15768SENT. In15769INin the15770DTthe Trump15771NPTrump versus15772CCversus Hawaii15773NPHawaii case15774NNcase ,15775,, the15776DTthe Court15777NPCourt said15778VVDsay that15779IN/thatthat the15780DTthe case15781NNcase had15782VHDhave nothing15783NNnothing to15784TOto do15785VVdo with15786INwith the15787DTthe Trump15788NPTrump versus15789CCversus Hawaii15790NPHawaii case15791NNcase .15792SENT. But15793CCbut still15794RBstill it15795PPit was15796VBDbe a15797DTa morally15798RBmorally repugnant15799JJrepugnant doctrine15800NNdoctrine that15801WDTthat was15802VBDbe purely15803RBpurely on15804INon the15805DTthe basis15806NNbasis ...15807:... considering15808VVGconsider the15809DTthe basis15810NNbasis of15811INof race15812NNrace ,15813,, and15814CCand ,15815,, therefore15816RBtherefore ,15817,, it15818PPit was15819VBDbe overruled15820VVNoverrule .15821SENT. The15822DTthe same15823JJsame here15824RBhere with15825INwith the15826DTthe Insular15827JJinsular Cases15828NNScase .15829SENT. And15830CCand I15831PPI cannot15832MDcan stress15833VVstress enough15834RBenough that15835IN/thatthat the15836DTthe parties15837NNSparty have15838VHPhave relied15839VVNrely on15840INon the15841DTthe Insular15842JJinsular Cases15843NNScase in15844INin this15845DTthis ...15846:... in15847INin this15848DTthis case15849NNcase .15850SENT. That15851DTthat is15852VBZbe why15853WRBwhy it15854PPit 's15855VBZbe the15856DTthe ...15857:... the15858DTthe perfect15859JJperfect opportunity15860NNopportunity to15861TOto address15862VVaddress them15863PPthem .15864SENT. Now15865RBnow ...15866:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15867LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Can15868MDcan I15869PPI ask15870VVask you15871PPyou a15872DTa question15873NNquestion about15874INabout the15875DTthe duties15876NNSduty of15877INof the15878DTthe Board15879NPBoard ?15880SENT? If15881INif the15882DTthe duties15883NNSduty of15884INof the15885DTthe Board15886NPBoard and15887CCand responsibilities15888NNSresponsibility are15889VBPbe considered15890VVNconsider primarily15891RBprimarily local15892JJlocal ...15893:... I15894PPI 'll15895MDwill ask15896VVask the15897DTthe same15898JJsame question15899NNquestion I15900PPI asked15901VVDask Mr15902NPMr .15903SENT. Olson15904NPOlson ...15905:... do15906VVPdo you15907PPyou lose15908VVPlose or15909CCor do15910VVPdo you15911PPyou have15912VHPhave an15913DTan alternative15914JJalternative argument15915NNargument ?15916SENT? [MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15917LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Your15918PP$your Honor15919NPHonor ,15920,, I15921PPI ...15922:... I15923PPI do15924VVPdo n't15925RBn't think15926VVthink that15927WDTthat we15928PPwe ...15929:... that15930IN/thatthat the15931DTthe ...15932:... the15933DTthe ...15934:... the15935DTthe authority15936NNauthority of15937INof the15938DTthe Board15939NPBoard can15940MDcan ...15941:... can15942MDcan ...15943:... can15944MDcan be15945VBbe considered15946VVNconsider purely15947RBpurely local15948JJlocal .15949SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]15950LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I15951PPI understand15952VVPunderstand that15953RBthat .15954SENT. But15955CCbut ,15956,, if15957INif ...15958:... if15959INif we15960PPwe conclude15961VVPconclude otherwise15962RBotherwise ,15963,, is15964VBZbe there15965RBthere an15966DTan alternative15967JJalternative argument15968NNargument ,15969,, or15970CCor is15971VBZbe that15972IN/thatthat the15973DTthe end15974NNend of15975INof the15976DTthe case15977NNcase ?15978SENT? [MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]15979LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Well15980UHWell ,15981,, I15982PPI ...15983:... I15984PPI believe15985VVPbelieve that15986IN/thatthat there15987EXthere is15988VBZbe the15989DTthe example15990NNexample of15991INof ...15992:... of15993INof D15994NPD .15995SENT. C15996LSc .15997SENT. judges15998NNSjudge who15999WPwho were16000VBDbe still16001RBstill considered16002VVNconsider to16003TOto be16004VBbe officers16005NNSofficer of16006INof the16007DTthe United16008NPUnited States16009NPSStates in16010INin the16011DTthe ...16012:... in16013INin the16014DTthe Weiss16015NPWeiss case16016NNcase .16017SENT. So16018RBso there16019EXthere is16020VBZbe ...16021:... there16022EXthere are16023VBPbe a16024DTa couple16025JJcouple other16026JJother examples16027NNSexample that16028IN/thatthat this16029DTthis Court16030NNcourt could16031MDcould ...16032:... could16033MDcould take16034VVtake .16035SENT. Now16036RBnow I16037PPI would16038MDwould like16039VVlike ...16040:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]16041LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Which16042WDTwhich D16043NPD .16044SENT. C16045SYMc ...16046:... .16047SENT. which16048WDTwhich D16049NND .16050SENT. C16051LSc .16052SENT. judges16053NNSjudge are16054VBPbe you16055PPyou talking16056VVGtalk about16057RBabout ?16058SENT? I16059PPI thought16060VVDthink the16061DTthe judges16062NNSjudge of16063INof the16064DTthe D16065NPD .16066SENT. C16067LSc .16068SENT. Superior16069NPSuperior Court16070NPCourt and16071CCand of16072INof the16073DTthe D16074NPD .16075SENT. C16076LSc .16077SENT. Court16078NPCourt of16079INof Appeals16080NPSAppeals are16081VBPbe not16082RBnot ...16083:... are16084VBPbe not16085RBnot federal16086JJfederal judges16087NNSjudge .16088SENT. [MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]16089LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Well16090UHWell ,16091,, Your16092PP$your Honor16093NPHonor ,16094,, I'm16095NPI'm ...16096:... I16097PPI 'm16098VBPbe talking16099VVGtalk about16100INabout the16101DTthe ...16102:... the16103DTthe Weiss16104NPWeiss case16105NNcase .16106SENT. And16107CCand ...16108:... but16109CCbut still16110RBstill the16111DTthe ...16112:... the16113DTthe ...16114:... the16115DTthe ...16116:... the16117DTthe issue16118NNissue of16119INof ...16120:... of16121INof the16122DTthe purely16123RBpurely local16124JJlocal affairs16125NNSaffair of16126INof ...16127:... of16128INof ...16129:... of16130INof the16131DTthe oversight16132NNoversight board16133NNboard cannot16134MDcan stand16135VVstand if16136INif we16137PPwe look16138VVPlook at16139INat the16140DTthe ...16141:... the16142DTthe authority16143NNauthority that16144IN/thatthat it16145PPit was16146VBDbe vested16147VVNvest on16148INon these16149DTthese officers16150NNSofficer through16151INthrough PROMESA16152NPPROMESA .16153SENT. Now16154RBnow I16155PPI would16156MDwould like16157VVlike to16158TOto address16159VVaddress the16160DTthe remedy16161NNremedy because16162INbecause I16163PPI think16164VVPthink that16165IN/thatthat it16166PPit is16167VBZbe very16168RBvery important16169JJimportant for16170INfor ...16171:... for16172INfor us16173PPus to16174TOto address16175VVaddress that16176DTthat .16177SENT. My16178PP$my friends16179NNSfriend on16180INon the16181DTthe other16182JJother side16183NNside have16184VHPhave mentioned16185VVNmention the16186DTthe consequences16187NNSconsequence of16188INof ...16189:... of16190INof this16191DTthis ...16192:... of16193INof this16194DTthis case16195NNcase in16196INin terms16197NNSterm of16198INof millions16199NNSmillion of16200INof dollars16201NNSdollar .16202SENT. But16203CCbut they16204PPthey have16205VHPhave forgot16206VVNforget about16207INabout the16208DTthe impact16209NNimpact to16210TOto the16211DTthe people16212NNSpeople .16213SENT. What16214WPWhat the16215DTthe ...16216:... what16217WPwhat the16218DTthe opposing16219JJopposing parties16220NNSparty are16221VBPbe asking16222VVGask this16223DTthis Court16224NPCourt to16225TOto validate16226VVvalidate through16227INthrough the16228DTthe de16229FWde facto16230FWfacto officer16231NNofficer doctrine16232NNdoctrine is16233VBZbe a16234DTa certification16235NNcertification of16236INof the16237DTthe fiscal16238JJfiscal plan16239NNplan ,16240,, which16241WDTwhich is16242VBZbe not16243RBnot subject16244JJsubject to16245TOto judicial16246JJjudicial review16247NNreview ,16248,, that16249WDTthat imposes16250VVZimpose austerity16251NNausterity measures16252NNSmeasure on16253INon the16254DTthe people16255NNSpeople that16256WDTthat has16257VHZhave impaired16258VVNimpair contractual16259JJcontractual obligations16260NNSobligation ,16261,, including16262VVGinclude the16263DTthe collective16264JJcollective bargaining16265NNbargaining agreement16266NNagreement of16267INof my16268PP$my clients16269NNSclient ,16270,, stripping16271VVGstrip them16272PPthem of16273INof ...16274:... of16275INof workers16276NNSworker '16277POS' rights16278NNSright like16279INlike salaries16280NNSsalary ,16281,, overpaying16282VVGoverpay ...16283:... overpayment16284NNoverpayment ,16285,, and16286CCand ...16287:... and16288CCand medical16289JJmedical ...16290:... medical16291JJmedical benefits16292NNSbenefit .16293SENT. But16294CCbut also16295RBalso we16296PPwe are16297VBPbe talking16298VVGtalk about16299INabout agreements16300NNSagreement with16301INwith bondholders16302NNSbondholder ,16303,, with16304INwith Dapapa16305NPDapapa ,16306,, which16307WDTwhich is16308VBZbe the16309DTthe UTIER16310NPUTIER 's16311POS's employers16312NNSemployer ,16313,, that16314WDTthat provides16315VVZprovide for16316INfor the16317DTthe payment16318NNpayment of16319INof the16320DTthe bond16321NNbond ...16322:... of16323INof the16324DTthe bonds16325NNSbond ahead16326RBahead of16327INof the16328DTthe salaries16329NNSsalary ,16330,, ahead16331RBahead of16332INof the16333DTthe ...16334:... of16335INof the16336DTthe contributions16337NNScontribution to16338TOto the16339DTthe retirement16340NNretirement system16341NNsystem ,16342,, and16343CCand that16344IN/thatthat it16345PPit threatens16346VVZthreaten the16347DTthe mere16348JJmere ...16349:... the16350DTthe mere16351JJmere feasibility16352NNfeasibility of16353INof such16354PDTsuch an16355DTan instrumentality16356NNinstrumentality .16357SENT. We16358PPwe are16359VBPbe talking16360VVGtalk about16361RBabout 7,00016362CD@card@ labor16363NNlabor claims16364NNSclaim that16365WDTthat were16366VBDbe stayed16367VVNstay because16368INbecause of16369INof the16370DTthe Title16371NPTitle III16372NPIII proceedings16373NNSproceeding ,16374,, proceedings16375NNSproceeding that16376WDTthat were16377VBDbe filed16378VVNfile at16379INat the16380DTthe sole16381JJsole discretion16382NNdiscretion of16383INof the16384DTthe oversight16385NNoversight board16386NNboard ,16387,, and16388CCand that16389WDTthat were16390VBDbe ...16391:... that16392WDTthat were16393VBDbe left16394VVNleave without16395INwithout a16396DTa remedy16397NNremedy .16398SENT. So16399RBso ...16400:... and16401CCand ...16402:... and16403CCand ...16404:... and16405CCand like16406INlike I16407PPI mentioned16408VVDmention ,16409,, the16410DTthe ...16411:... the16412DTthe budgets16413NNSbudget that16414WDTthat establish16415VVestablish the16416DTthe policy16417NNpolicy for16418INfor the16419DTthe government16420NNgovernment of16421INof Puerto16422NPPuerto Rico16423NPRico ,16424,, that16425WDTthat it16426PPit is16427VBZbe done16428VVNdo at16429INat the16430DTthe sole16431JJsole discretion16432NNdiscretion of16433INof the16434DTthe oversight16435NNoversight board16436NNboard because16437INbecause we16438PPwe cannot16439MDcan say16440VVsay that16441IN/thatthat the16442DTthe government16443NNgovernment of16444INof Puerto16445NPPuerto Rico16446NPRico has16447VHZhave participation16448NNparticipation .16449SENT. The16450DTthe ...16451:... if16452INif ...16453:... if16454INif the16455DTthe Board16456NPBoard ...16457:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16458LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] You16459PPyou can16460MDcan finish16461VVfinish your16462PP$your sentence16463NNsentence .16464SENT. [MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG]16465LOC[MS. MENDEZ-COLBERG] Yes16466NPYes ,16467,, thank16468VVPthank you16469PPyou .16470SENT. If16471INif the16472DTthe Board16473NPBoard understands16474VVZunderstand that16475IN/thatthat the16476DTthe ...16477:... that16478IN/thatthat the16479DTthe fiscal16480JJfiscal plan16481NNplan ,16482,, which16483WDTwhich is16484VBZbe the16485DTthe blueprint16486NNblueprint for16487INfor all16488DTall of16489INof these16490DTthese proceedings16491NNSproceeding ,16492,, or16493CCor the16494DTthe budgets16495NNSbudget ,16496,, are16497VBPbe inconsistent16498JJinconsistent with16499INwith PROMESA16500NPPROMESA ,16501,, the16502DTthe Board16503NPBoard can16504MDcan substitute16505VVsubstitute for16506INfor its16507PP$its own16508JJown at16509INat its16510PP$its sole16511JJsole discretion16512NNdiscretion .16513SENT. Thank16514VVthank you16515PPyou .16516SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]16517LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank16518VVthank you16519PPyou ,16520,, counsel16521NNcounsel .16522SENT. 216523CD2 Three16524CDThree minutes16525NNSminute ,16526,, Mr16527NPMr .16528SENT. Verrilli16529NPVerrilli .16530SENT.

[MR. VERRILLI]16531LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Thank16532VVthank you16533PPyou ,16534,, Mr16535NPMr .16536SENT. Chief16537NPChief Justice16538NPJustice .16539SENT. I16540PPI want16541VVPwant to16542TOto make16543VVmake one16544CDone overarching16545JJoverarching point16546NNpoint on16547INon the16548DTthe merits16549NNSmerit and16550CCand one16551CDone point16552NNpoint on16553INon remedy16554NNremedy .16555SENT. On16556INon the16557DTthe merits16558NNSmerit ,16559,, I16560PPI want16561VVPwant to16562TOto go16563VVgo at16564INat the16565DTthe sum16566NNsum of16567INof each16568DTeach question16569NNquestion .16570SENT. I16571PPI think16572VVPthink ,16573,, if16574INif you16575PPyou think16576VVPthink the16577DTthe sum16578NNsum of16579INof each16580DTeach ,16581,, I16582PPI do16583VVPdo n't16584RBn't think16585VVthink you16586PPyou can16587MDcan resolve16588VVresolve it16589PPit based16590VVNbase on16591INon effects16592NNSeffect .16593SENT. I16594PPI mean16595VVPmean ,16596,, if16597INif you16598PPyou think16599VVPthink about16600INabout it16601PPit ,16602,, the16603DTthe effects16604NNSeffect we16605PPwe 're16606VBPbe talking16607VVGtalk about16608RBabout here16609RBhere are16610VBPbe not16611RBnot the16612DTthe Board16613NPBoard 's16614POS's actions16615NNSaction .16616SENT. It16617PPit was16618VBDbe the16619DTthe issuance16620NNissuance of16621INof the16622DTthe bonds16623NNSbond and16624CCand then16625RBthen the16626DTthe default16627NNdefault by16628INby the16629DTthe government16630NNgovernment of16631INof Puerto16632NPPuerto Rico16633NPRico ,16634,, the16635DTthe elected16636VVNelect representatives16637NNSrepresentative of16638INof Puerto16639NPPuerto Rico16640NPRico .16641SENT. So16642RBso ,16643,, if16644INif its16645PP$its effect16646NNeffect is16647VBZbe then16648RBthen they16649PPthey 're16650VBPbe officers16651NNSofficer of16652INof the16653DTthe United16654NPUnited States16655NPSStates ,16656,, that16657WDTthat can16658MDcan 't16659RB't be16660VBbe right16661JJright and16662CCand it16663PPit 's16664VBZbe just16665RBjust not16666RBnot an16667DTan administrable16668JJadministrable test16669NNtest .16670SENT. It16671PPit can16672MDcan 't16673RB't be16674VBbe whether16675INwhether they16676PPthey are16677VBPbe enforcing16678VVGenforce federal16679JJfederal law16680NNlaw .16681SENT. Mr16682NPMr .16683SENT. Olson16684NPOlson raised16685VVDraise the16686DTthe Limtiaco16687NPLimtiaco case16688NNcase .16689SENT. That16690DTthat case16691NNcase proves16692VVZprove our16693PP$our point16694NNpoint .16695SENT. The16696DTthe statute16697NNstatute he16698PPhe 's16699VBZbe talking16700VVGtalk about16701RBabout in16702INin that16703DTthat case16704NNcase requiring16705VVGrequire fiscal16706JJfiscal solvency16707NNsolvency was16708VBDbe enforced16709VVNenforce by16710INby the16711DTthe governor16712NNgovernor and16713CCand the16714DTthe legislature16715NNlegislature ,16716,, who16717WPwho are16718VBPbe not16719RBnot appointed16720VVNappoint in16721INin conformity16722NNconformity with16723INwith the16724DTthe Appointments16725NNSappointment Clause16726NNclause but16727CCbut elected16728VVNelect .16729SENT. So16730RBso ,16731,, if16732INif he16733PPhe 's16734VBZbe right16735RBright about16736RBabout that16737IN/thatthat ,16738,, Guam16739NPGuam 's16740POS's government16741NNgovernment is16742VBZbe unconstitutional16743JJunconstitutional .16744SENT. And16745CCand it16746PPit also16747RBalso would16748MDwould mean16749VVmean that16750IN/thatthat the16751DTthe D16752NPD .16753SENT. C16754LSc .16755SENT. government16756NNgovernment ,16757,, from16758INfrom the16759DTthe ...16760:... from16761INfrom the16762DTthe beginning16763NNbeginning until16764INuntil home16765NNhome rule16766NNrule ,16767,, was16768VBDbe unconstitutional16769JJunconstitutional because16770INbecause they16771PPthey were16772VBDbe enforcing16773VVGenforce federal16774JJfederal statutes16775NNSstatute .16776SENT. So16777INso that16778DTthat can16779MDcan 't16780RB't be16781VBbe right16782JJright .16783SENT. It16784PPit can16785MDcan 't16786RB't be16787VBbe based16788VVNbase on16789INon the16790DTthe source16791NNsource of16792INof authority16793NNauthority .16794SENT. They16795PPthey 're16796VBPbe really16797RBreally not16798RBnot arguing16799VVGargue that16800IN/thatthat anymore16801RBanymore .16802SENT. And16803CCand even16804RBeven if16805INif you16806PPyou wanted16807VVDwant to16808TOto accept16809VVaccept the16810DTthe intermediate16811JJintermediate authority16812NNauthority point16813NNpoint ,16814,, you16815PPyou ...16816:... and16817CCand try16818VVPtry to16819TOto carve16820VVcarve out16821RPout Puerto16822NPPuerto Rico16823NPRico that16824DTthat way16825NNway ,16826,, you16827PPyou can16828MDcan 't16829RB't save16830INsave Guam16831NPGuam ,16832,, you16833PPyou can16834MDcan 't16835RB't save16836INsave the16837DTthe Virgin16838NPVirgin Islands16839NPSIslands ,16840,, you16841PPyou can16842MDcan 't16843RB't save16844INsave home16845NNhome rule16846NNrule in16847INin D16848NPD .16849SENT. C16850LSc .16851SENT. You16852PPyou basically16853RBbasically blow16854VVblow everything16855NNeverything else16856RBelse up16857RBup if16858INif you16859PPyou adopt16860VVPadopt that16861DTthat standard16862NNstandard ,16863,, which16864WDTwhich is16865VBZbe why16866WRBwhy they16867PPthey do16868VVPdo n't16869RBn't really16870RBreally advocate16871VVadvocate for16872INfor it16873PPit .16874SENT. So16875RBso really16876RBreally it16877PPit needs16878VVZneed to16879TOto be16880VBbe our16881PP$our test16882NNtest .16883SENT. Our16884PP$our test16885NNtest is16886VBZbe one16887CDone that16888WDTthat 's16889VBZbe faithful16890JJfaithful to16891TOto the16892DTthe text16893NNtext ,16894,, it16895PPit 's16896VBZbe faithful16897JJfaithful to16898TOto the16899DTthe history16900NNhistory ,16901,, it16902PPit rests16903VVZrest on16904INon principle16905NNprinciple ,16906,, it16907PPit avoids16908VVZavoid threats16909NNSthreat to16910TOto home16911NNhome rule16912NNrule ,16913,, and16914CCand it16915PPit 's16916VBZbe administrable16917JJadministrable .16918SENT. Maybe16919RBmaybe there16920EXthere are16921VBPbe going16922VVGgo to16923TOto be16924VBbe hard16925JJhard questions16926NNSquestion on16927INon the16928DTthe margin16929NNmargin and16930CCand we16931PPwe discussed16932VVDdiscuss those16933DTthose today16934NNtoday .16935SENT. This16936DTthis is16937VBZbe not16938RBnot a16939DTa hard16940JJhard case16941NNcase .16942SENT. This16943DTthis is16944VBZbe exclusively16945RBexclusively territorial16946JJterritorial authority16947NNauthority .16948SENT. Now16949RBnow ,16950,, on16951INon remedy16952NNremedy ,16953,, I16954PPI think16955VVPthink Mr16956NPMr .16957SENT. Olson16958NPOlson 's16959POS's answer16960NNanswer to16961TOto Justice16962NPJustice Alito16963NPAlito 's16964POS's question16965NNquestion tells16966VVZtell you16967PPyou all16968RBall you16969PPyou need16970VVPneed to16971TOto know16972VVknow about16973RBabout what16974WPwhat 's16975VBZbe going16976VVGgo to16977TOto happen16978VVhappen next16979JJnext .16980SENT. They16981PPthey brought16982VVDbring this16983DTthis suit16984NNsuit because16985INbecause they16986PPthey want16987VVPwant a16988DTa different16989JJdifferent Board16990NPBoard .16991SENT. They16992PPthey 're16993VBPbe perfectly16994RBperfectly entitled16995VVNentitle to16996TOto do16997VVdo that16998DTthat .16999SENT. They17000PPthey 've17001VHPhave every17002DTevery right17003NNright to17004TOto do17005VVdo that17006DTthat .17007SENT. But17008CCbut that17009DTthat 's17010VBZbe what17011WPwhat they17012PPthey want17013VVPwant because17014INbecause they17015PPthey do17016VVPdo n't17017RBn't like17018VVlike the17019DTthe way17020NNway this17021DTthis Board17022NPBoard is17023VBZbe working17024VVGwork out17025RPout the17026DTthe debt17027NNdebt problems17028NNSproblem .17029SENT. And17030CCand so17031INso what17032WPwhat you17033PPyou can17034MDcan be17035VBbe sure17036JJsure of17037INof ,17038,, if17039INif we17040PPwe 're17041VBPbe in17042INin the17043DTthe remedies17044NNSremedy phase17045NNphase and17046CCand I17047PPI hope17048VVPhope that17049IN/thatthat we17050PPwe are17051VBPbe not17052RBnot ,17053,, but17054CCbut what17055WPwhat you17056PPyou can17057MDcan be17058VBbe sure17059JJsure of17060INof if17061INif we17062PPwe are17063VBPbe is17064VBZbe that17065IN/thatthat they17066PPthey are17067VBPbe going17068VVGgo to17069TOto fight17070VVfight ratification17071NNratification by17072INby the17073DTthe Board17074NPBoard tooth17075NNtooth and17076CCand nail17077NNnail for17078INfor years17079NNSyear and17080CCand years17081NNSyear and17082CCand do17083VVPdo everything17084NNeverything possible17085JJpossible to17086TOto keep17087VVkeep this17088DTthis thing17089NNthing in17090INin a17091DTa situation17092NNsituation in17093INin which17094WDTwhich they17095PPthey ...17096:... they17097PPthey ...17098:... they17099PPthey have17100VHPhave the17101DTthe hope17102NNhope to17103TOto get17104VVget a17105DTa different17106JJdifferent Board17107NPBoard that17108WDTthat will17109MDwill accomplish17110VVaccomplish their17111PP$their objectives17112NNSobjective .17113SENT. So17114RBso that17115DTthat 's17116VBZbe what17117WPwhat will17118MDwill happen17119VVhappen if17120INif we17121PPwe go17122VVPgo down17123RPdown that17124DTthat path17125NNpath .17126SENT. And17127CCand I17128PPI would17129MDwould strongly17130RBstrongly urge17131VVurge the17132DTthe Court17133NPCourt not17134RBnot to17135TOto do17136VVdo that17137DTthat .17138SENT. If17139INif you17140PPyou do17141VVPdo reach17142VVreach the17143DTthe remedial17144JJremedial issue17145NNissue ,17146,, then17147RBthen I17148PPI think17149VVPthink the17150DTthe de17151FWde facto17152FWfacto officer17153NNofficer doctrine17154NNdoctrine ,17155,, a17156DTa perfectly17157RBperfectly reasonable17158JJreasonable judgment17159NNjudgment ,17160,, but17161CCbut more17162RBRmore fundamentally17163RBfundamentally ,17164,, there17165EXthere is17166VBZbe no17167DTno reason17168NNreason to17169TOto reach17170VVreach the17171DTthe remedial17172JJremedial issue17173NNissue ...17174:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]17175LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Mr17176NPMr ...17177:... .17178SENT. Mr17179NPMr .17180SENT. Verrilli17181NPVerrilli ...17182:... [MR. VERRILLI]17183LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...17184:... to17185TOto support17186VVsupport as17187RBas ...17188:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]17189LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...17190:... let17191VVlet ...17192:... [MR. VERRILLI]17193LOC[MR. VERRILLI] ...17194:... constitutional17195JJconstitutional ...17196:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]17197LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...17198:... let17199VVlet 's17200VBZbe say17201VVsay it17202PPit is17203VBZbe your17204PP$your test17205NNtest .17206SENT. But17207CCbut let17208NNlet 's17209POS's also17210RBalso say17211VVPsay that17212IN/thatthat the17213DTthe crux17214NNcrux of17215INof this17216DTthis statute17217NNstatute ...17218:... there17219EXthere are17220VBPbe some17221DTsome other17222JJother things17223NNSthing in17224INin it17225PPit ,17226,, but17227CCbut the17228DTthe crux17229NNcrux of17230INof the17231DTthe statute17232NNstatute is17233VBZbe that17234IN/thatthat it17235PPit sets17236VVZset up17237RPup a17238DTa scheme17239NNscheme for17240INfor restructuring17241VVGrestructure the17242DTthe debt17243NNdebt of17244INof a17245DTa bankrupt17246JJbankrupt territory17247NNterritory and17248CCand ...17249:... on17250INon ...17251:... with17252INwith the17253DTthe backdrop17254NNbackdrop that17255IN/thatthat that17256WDTthat could17257MDcould not17258RBnot have17259VHhave been17260VBNbe done17261VVNdo under17262INunder pre-PROMESA17263NPpre-PROMESA federal17264JJfederal law17265NNlaw by17266INby local17267JJlocal officials17268NNSofficial themselves17269PPthemselves .17270SENT. Why17271WRBwhy is17272VBZbe it17273PPit primarily17274RBprimarily local17275JJlocal ?17276SENT? [MR. VERRILLI]17277LOC[MR. VERRILLI] May17278MDmay I17279PPI answer17280VVanswer ,17281,, Mr17282NPMr .17283SENT. Chief17284NPChief Justice17285NPJustice ?17286SENT? [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]17287LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Yes17288NPYes .17289SENT. [MR. VERRILLI]17290LOC[MR. VERRILLI] Two17291CDTwo things17292NNSthing .17293SENT. First17294RBfirst ,17295,, you17296PPyou would17297MDwould n't17298RBn't think17299VVthink that17300IN/thatthat the17301DTthe mayor17302NNmayor of17303INof Detroit17304NPDetroit was17305VBDbe converted17306VVNconvert into17307INinto a17308DTa federal17309JJfederal official17310NNofficial because17311INbecause he17312PPhe took17313VVDtake Detroit17314NPDetroit into17315INinto bankruptcy17316NNbankruptcy under17317INunder Chapter17318NPChapter 917319CD9 .17320SENT. He17321PPhe 's17322VBZbe still17323RBstill exercising17324VVGexercise his17325PP$his local17326JJlocal power17327NNpower .17328SENT. Same17329JJsame with17330INwith the17331DTthe Board17332NPBoard .17333SENT. And17334CCand ,17335,, second17336RBsecond ,17337,, again17338RBagain ,17339,, the17340DTthe question17341NNquestion I17342PPI think17343VVPthink has17344VHZhave to17345TOto be17346VBbe whose17347WP$whose interests17348NNSinterest is17349VBZbe ...17350:... is17351VBZbe the17352DTthe Board17353NPBoard advancing17354VVGadvance in17355INin that17356DTthat process17357NNprocess ?17358SENT? It17359PPit 's17360VBZbe the17361DTthe court17362NNcourt ,17363,, the17364DTthe Article17365NPArticle III17366NPIII court17367NNcourt ,17368,, that17369WDTthat engages17370VVZengage in17371INin the17372DTthe broad17373JJbroad adjustment17374NNadjustment of17375INof interests17376NNSinterest here17377RBhere to17378TOto achieve17379VVachieve a17380DTa ...17381:... a17382DTa nationwide17383JJnationwide result17384NNresult .17385SENT. The17386DTthe Board17387NPBoard 's17388POS's job17389NNjob ,17390,, as17391INas the17392DTthe statute17393NNstatute expressly17394RBexpressly says17395VVZsay ,17396,, is17397VBZbe to17398TOto act17399VVact on17400INon behalf17401NNbehalf of17402INof the17403DTthe people17404NNSpeople of17405INof Puerto17406NPPuerto Rico17407NPRico and17408CCand the17409DTthe government17410NNgovernment of17411INof Puerto17412NPPuerto Rico17413NPRico as17414INas its17415PP$its representative17416NNrepresentative .17417SENT. It17418PPit 's17419VBZbe an17420DTan advocate17421NNadvocate for17422INfor Puerto17423NPPuerto Rico17424NPRico ,17425,, and17426CCand that17427DTthat 's17428VBZbe why17429WRBwhy it17430PPit 's17431POS's territorial17432JJterritorial authority17433NNauthority .17434SENT. Thank17435VVthank you17436PPyou .17437SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]17438LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank17439VVthank you17440PPyou ,17441,, counsel17442NNcounsel .17443SENT. The17444DTthe case17445NNcase is17446VBZbe submitted17447VVNsubmit .17448SENT.