<s> /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/ptreetagger/Food.xml-src.tt /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/treetagger/Food.xml-out.tt pos tagset built from model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par en lemma of the model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par - [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We2PPwe 'll3MDwill hear4VVhear argument5NNargument first6RBfirst this7DTthis morning8NNmorning in9INin Case10NPCase 18-48111CD@card@ ,12,, the13DTthe Food14NPFood Marketing15NPMarketing Institute16NPInstitute versus17CCversus the18DTthe Argus19NPArgus Leader20NPLeader ...21:... versus22CCversus Argus23NPArgus Leader24NPLeader Media25NPMedia .26SENT. Mr27NPMr .28SENT. Young29NPYoung .30SENT.

[MR. YOUNG]31LOC[MR. YOUNG] Mr32NPMr .33SENT. Chief34NPChief Justice35NPJustice ,36,, and37CCand may38MDmay it39PPit please40VVplease the41DTthe Court42NPCourt :43:: Before44INbefore I45PPI turn46VVturn to47TOto why48WRBwhy the49DTthe Court50NPCourt should51MDshould jettison52VVjettison the53DTthe National54NPNational Parks55NPParks definition56NNdefinition of57INof "58``" confidential59JJconfidential "60''" and61CCand instead62RBinstead restore63VVrestore that64DTthat word65NNword 's66POS's plain67JJplain meaning68NNmeaning as69INas used70VVNuse in71INin Exemption72NPExemption 473CD4 of74INof the75DTthe Freedom76NPFreedom of77INof Information78NPInformation Act79NPAct ,80,, let81VVDlet me82PPme address83VVaddress justiciability84NNjusticiability .85SENT. Respondent86NNrespondent 's87POS's brief88NNbrief expressed89VVDexpress doubts90NNSdoubt about91INabout redressability92NNredressability ,93,, but94CCbut redressability95NNredressability and96CCand the97DTthe other98JJother two99CDtwo requirements100NNSrequirement of101INof Article102NPArticle III103NPIII standing104NNstanding are105VBPbe established106VVNestablish here107RBhere .108SENT. First109RBfirst ,110,, our111PP$our injury112NNinjury in113INin fact114NNfact is115VBZbe the116DTthe disclosure117NNdisclosure of118INof our119PP$our members120NNSmember '121POS' store-level122JJstore-level sales123NNSsale information124NNinformation that125IN/thatthat they126PPthey keep127VVkeep secret128JJsecret .129SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]130LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Not131RBnot if132INif the133DTthe government134NNgovernment decides135VVZdecide that136IN/thatthat it137PPit does138VVZdo n't139RBn't want140VVwant to141TOto give142VVgive it143PPit .144SENT. We145PPwe already146RBalready have147VHPhave a148DTa case149NNcase that150WDTthat says151VVZsay ,152,, if153INif the154DTthe government155NNgovernment voluntarily156RBvoluntarily chooses157VVZchoose to158TOto disclose159VVdisclose ,160,, you161PPyou 're162VBPbe stuck163VVNstick ;164:; you165PPyou can166MDcan 't167RB't appeal168NNappeal .169SENT. So170RBso ,171,, here172RBhere ,173,, the174DTthe government175NNgovernment chose176VVDchoose not177RBnot to178TOto appeal179VVappeal .180SENT. It181PPit chose182VVDchoose ,183,, by184INby definition185NNdefinition ,186,, to187TOto turn188VVturn it189PPit over190RPover .191SENT. Why192WRBwhy are193VBPbe n't194RBn't you195PPyou bound196VVDbind by197INby that198DTthat decision199NNdecision ?200SENT? [MR. YOUNG]201LOC[MR. YOUNG] We202PPwe 're203VBPbe not204RBnot bound205VVNbind for206INfor it207PPit because208INbecause the209DTthe intervention210NNintervention that211IN/thatthat we212PPwe successfully213RBsuccessfully moved214VVDmove in215INin the216DTthe District217NPDistrict of218INof South219NPSouth Dakota220NPDakota made221VVDmake us222PPus a223DTa proper224JJproper party225NNparty .226SENT. We227PPwe have228VHPhave an229DTan interest230NNinterest that231WDTthat allowed232VVDallow us233PPus to234TOto intervene235VVintervene .236SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]237LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But238CCbut the239DTthe ...240:... if241INif you242PPyou had243VHDhave been244VBNbe a245DTa part246NNpart of247INof the248DTthe ...249:... if250INif you251PPyou had252VHDhave been253VBNbe the254DTthe original255JJoriginal asker256NNasker ,257,, we258PPwe have259VHPhave a260DTa case261NNcase that262WDTthat says263VVZsay ...264:... Crystal265NPCrystal City266NPCity ...267:... that268WDTthat if269INif the270DTthe government271NNgovernment chooses272VVZchoose to273TOto turn274VVturn it275PPit over276RPover ,277,, you278PPyou can279MDcan 't280RB't appeal281NNappeal .282SENT. [MR. YOUNG]283LOC[MR. YOUNG] And284CCand the285DTthe government286NNgovernment did287VVDdo not288RBnot make289VVmake that290DTthat choice291NNchoice .292SENT. So293RBso there294EXthere are295VBPbe really296RBreally five297CDfive things298NNSthing .299SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]300LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Well301UHWell ,302,, but303CCbut they304PPthey have305VHPhave n't306RBn't made307VVNmake the308DTthe choice309NNchoice on310INon this311DTthis exemption312NNexemption .313SENT. They314PPthey 've315VHPhave made316VVNmake the317DTthe choice318NNchoice because319INbecause of320INof a321DTa new322JJnew law323NNlaw .324SENT. Is325VBZbe n't326RBn't the327DTthe proper328JJproper course329NNcourse for330INfor them331PPthem to332TOto go333VVgo back334RBback to335TOto the336DTthe district337NNdistrict court338NNcourt with339INwith a340DTa motion341NNmotion for342INfor reconsideration343NNreconsideration or344CCor for345INfor them346PPthem to347TOto petition348VVpetition the349DTthe court350NNcourt or351CCor for352INfor you353PPyou to354TOto go355VVgo to356TOto the357DTthe court358NNcourt or359CCor for360INfor ...361:... or362CCor ...363:... or364CCor for365INfor someone366NNsomeone else367RBelse to368TOto go369VVgo to370TOto the371DTthe court372NNcourt and373CCand say374VVPsay they375PPthey have376VHPhave to377TOto turn378VVturn it379PPit over380RPover ?381SENT? [MR. YOUNG]382LOC[MR. YOUNG] No383NPNo ,384,, Your385PP$your Honor386NPHonor .387SENT. The388DTthe government389NNgovernment in390INin this391DTthis case392NNcase made393VVDmake a394DTa number395NNnumber of396INof steps397NNSstep that398WDTthat make399VVPmake clear400JJclear that401IN/thatthat our402PP$our redressability403NNredressability is404VBZbe not405RBnot only406RBonly likely407JJlikely but408CCbut certain409JJcertain .410SENT. And411CCand let412VVlet me413PPme start414VVstart because415INbecause standing416VVGstand at417INat the418DTthe time419NNtime ...420:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]421LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Well422UHwell ,423,, it424PPit 's425VBZbe not426RBnot certain427JJcertain until428INuntil the429DTthe district430NNdistrict court431NNcourt relieves432VVZrelieve them433PPthem of434INof the435DTthe earlier436JJRearly judgment437NNjudgment ,438,, telling439VVGtell them440PPthem that441IN/thatthat Exemption442NPExemption 3443CD3 did444VVDdo n't445RBn't apply446VVapply .447SENT. [MR. YOUNG]448LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well449UHWell ,450,, that451WDTthat ...452:... that453DTthat premise454NNpremise ,455,, I456PPI think457VVPthink ,458,, is459VBZbe ...460:... is461VBZbe a462DTa mistaken463JJmistaken one464CDone .465SENT. And466CCand if467INif you468PPyou look469VVPlook at470INat pages471NNSpage 30472CD@card@ to473TOto 31474CD@card@ of475INof the476DTthe government477NNgovernment 's478POS's brief479NNbrief ,480,, for481INfor example482NNexample ,483,, they484PPthey make485VVPmake clear486JJclear that487IN/thatthat they488PPthey are489VBPbe not490RBnot pressing491VVGpress an492DTan Exemption493NPExemption 3494CD3 argument495NNargument here496RBhere .497SENT. They498PPthey are499VBPbe not500RBnot requiring501VVGrequire this502DTthis Court503NPCourt or504CCor even505RBeven asking506VVGask this507DTthis Court508NPCourt to509TOto reconsider510VVreconsider the511DTthe Section512NNsection 2018513CD@card@ (514(( c515LSc )516)) argument517NNargument ,518,, on519INon which520WDTwhich the521DTthe Eighth522JJeighth Circu523NPCircu it524PPit 's525VBZbe first526JJfirst judgment527NNjudgment ...528:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]529LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But530CCbut that531DTthat 's532VBZbe the533DTthe basis534NNbasis for535INfor their536PP$their refusal537NNrefusal to538TOto turn539VVturn it540PPit over541RPover now542RBnow .543SENT. [MR. YOUNG]544LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well545UHWell ,546,, no547UHno ,548,, the549DTthe ...550:... the551DTthe basis552NNbasis for553INfor ...554:... for555INfor their556PP$their refusal557NNrefusal to558TOto turn559VVturn it560PPit over561INover now562RBnow is563VBZbe an564DTan Exemption565NPExemption 4566CD4 basis567NNbasis ,568,, that569IN/thatthat the570DTthe information571NNinformation ...572:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]573LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Well574UHwell ,575,, they576PPthey can577MDcan speak578VVspeak for579INfor themselves580PPthemselves ,581,, but582CCbut I583PPI thought584VVDthink ...585:... [MR. YOUNG]586LOC[MR. YOUNG] Agreed587VVDagree .588SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]589LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...590:... when591WRBwhen they592PPthey chose593VVDchoose not594RBnot to595TOto appeal596VVappeal ,597,, they598PPthey chose599VVDchoose not600RBnot ...601:... they602PPthey chose603VVDchoose to604TOto follow605VVfollow the606DTthe order607NNorder of608INof the609DTthe court610NNcourt to611TOto turn612VVturn it613PPit over614RPover .615SENT. [MR. YOUNG]616LOC[MR. YOUNG] There617EXthere are618VBPbe a619DTa number620NNnumber of621INof things622NNSthing that623WDTthat differentiate624VVPdifferentiate this625DTthis from626INfrom a627DTa situation628NNsituation like629INlike that630DTthat .631SENT. For632INfor example633NNexample ,634,, instead635RBinstead of636INof voluntarily637RBvoluntarily disclosing638VVGdisclose it639PPit ,640,, which641WDTwhich would642MDwould be643VBbe what644WPwhat they645PPthey would646MDwould do647VVdo if648INif they649PPthey decided650VVDdecide to651TOto follow652VVfollow it653PPit ,654,, they655PPthey facilitated656VVDfacilitate our657PP$our intervention658NNintervention by659INby alerting660VVGalert us661PPus to662TOto the663DTthe possibility664NNpossibility of665INof judicial666JJjudicial intervention667NNintervention .668SENT. They669PPthey then670RBthen ,671,, when672WRBwhen we673PPwe did674VVDdo intervene675VVintervene ,676,, told677VVDtell the678DTthe district679NNdistrict court680NNcourt ,681,, they682PPthey told683VVDtell the684DTthe federal685JJfederal court686NNcourt ,687,, as688INas they689PPthey 've690VHPhave told691VVNtell this692DTthis Court693NPCourt ,694,, we695PPwe will696MDwill not697RBnot release698VVrelease that699DTthat information700NNinformation unless701INunless a702DTa final703JJfinal judgment704NNjudgment in705INin the706DTthe judicial707JJjudicial system708NNsystem requires709VVZrequire it710PPit .711SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]712LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Do713VVPdo you714PPyou understand715VVPunderstand the716DTthe government717NNgovernment to718TOto be719VBbe firmly720RBfirmly committed721VVNcommit to722TOto not723RBnot releasing724VVGrelease the725DTthe information726NNinformation unless727INunless required728VVNrequire to729TOto ?730SENT? [MR. YOUNG]731LOC[MR. YOUNG] Yes732NPYes ,733,, that734WDTthat 's735VBZbe what736WPwhat I737PPI understand738VVPunderstand .739SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]740LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] I741PPI noticed742VVDnotice them743PPthem on744INon your745PP$your ...746:... your747PP$your side748NNside of749INof the750DTthe lectern751NNlectern .752SENT. [MR. YOUNG]753LOC[MR. YOUNG] And754CCand I755PPI won756MDwill 't757RB't speak758VVspeak for759INfor them760PPthem ,761,, but762CCbut that763DTthat 's764VBZbe what765WPwhat they766PPthey have767VHPhave represented768VVNrepresent not769RBnot only770RBonly to771TOto the772DTthe district773NNdistrict court774NNcourt but775CCbut to776TOto this777DTthis Court778NPCourt .779SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]780LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Now781RBnow ,782,, of783INof course784NNcourse ,785,, they786PPthey remain787VVPremain free788JJfree to789TOto change790VVchange their791PP$their mind792NNmind .793SENT. [MR. YOUNG]794LOC[MR. YOUNG] And795CCand that796WDTthat would797MDwould be798VBbe a799DTa ...800:... a801DTa ...802:... a803DTa different804JJdifferent situation805NNsituation ,806,, but807CCbut the808DTthe question809NNquestion for810INfor standing811VVGstand at812INat the813DTthe time814NNtime when815WRBwhen we816PPwe invoked817VVDinvoke the818DTthe appellate819JJappellate jurisdiction820NNjurisdiction of821INof the822DTthe federal823JJfederal courts824NNScourt was825VBDbe would826MDwould we827PPwe have828VHhave a829DTa likelihood830NNlikelihood of831INof relief832NNrelief ,833,, and834CCand the835DTthe answer836NNanswer is837VBZbe yes838UHyes .839SENT. And840CCand ,841,, right842RBright now843RBnow ,844,, based845VVNbase on846INon the847DTthe Solicitor848NPSolicitor General849NPGeneral 's850POS's brief851NNbrief ,852,, that853WDTthat was854VBDbe the855DTthe thing856NNthing that857IN/thatthat my858PP$my friend859NNfriend on860INon the861DTthe other862JJother side863NNside invoked864VVNinvoke in865INin his866PP$his brief867NNbrief to868TOto this869DTthis Court870NPCourt .871SENT. That872DTthat would873MDwould be874VBbe a875DTa mootness876NNmootness question877NNquestion .878SENT. And879CCand ,880,, of881INof course882NNcourse ,883,, mootness884NNmootness can885MDcan be886VBbe established887VVNestablish only888RBonly if889INif it890PPit 's891VBZbe impossible892JJimpossible that893IN/thatthat this894DTthis Court895NPCourt 's896POS's reversal897NNreversal would898MDwould give899VVgive us900PPus meaningful901JJmeaningful relief902NNrelief .903SENT. The904DTthe opposite905NNopposite is906VBZbe true907JJtrue .908SENT. If909INif this910DTthis Court911NPCourt reverses912VVZreverse ,913,, the914DTthe only915JJonly thing916NNthing that917WDTthat will918MDwill lead919VVlead to920TOto our921PP$our information922NNinformation certainly923RBcertainly being924VBGbe made925VVNmake public926NNpublic will927MDwill be928VBbe destroyed929VVNdestroy .930SENT. And931CCand that932DTthat 's933VBZbe why934WRBwhy all935PDTall the936DTthe requirements937NNSrequirement of938INof Article939NPArticle III940NPIII standing941NNstanding are942VBPbe met943VVNmeet ...944:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]945LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But946CCbut it947PPit won948MDwill 't949RB't be950VBbe destroyed951VVNdestroy because952INbecause they953PPthey have954VHPhave a955DTa 2018956CD@card@ (957(( c958LSc )959)) argument960NNargument .961SENT. [MR. YOUNG]962LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well963UHWell ,964,, the965DTthe fact966NNfact ,967,, as968RBas in969INin Milner970NPMilner ,971,, in972INin which973WDTwhich there974EXthere was975VBDbe an976DTan Exemption977NPExemption 7978CD7 argument979NNargument pending980VVGpend ,981,, this982DTthis Court983NPCourt took984VVDtake it985PPit to986TOto decide987VVdecide Exemption988NPExemption 2989CD2 .990SENT. Sure991RBsure ,992,, there993EXthere 's994VBZbe a995DTa 2018996CD@card@ (997(( c998LSc )999)) argument1000NNargument that1001IN/thatthat ,1002,, in1003INin theory1004NNtheory ,1005,, would1006MDwould be1007VBbe pending1008VVGpend if1009INif this1010DTthis Court1011NPCourt were1012VBDbe not1013RBnot persuaded1014VVNpersuade by1015INby anything1016NNanything we1017PPwe say1018VVPsay ,1019,, there1020EXthere 's1021VHZhave been1022VBNbe an1023DTan intervening1024VVGintervene change1025NNchange in1026INin the1027DTthe law1028NNlaw ...1029:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1030LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] If1031INif they1032PPthey 're1033VBPbe wrong1034JJwrong on1035INon 20181036CD@card@ (1037(( c1038LSc )1039)) ,1040,, they1041PPthey have1042VHPhave to1043TOto comply1044VVcomply with1045INwith the1046DTthe extant1047JJextant judgment1048NNjudgment under1049INunder Exemption1050NPExemption 41051CD4 ?1052SENT? [MR. YOUNG]1053LOC[MR. YOUNG] No1054NPNo ,1055,, I1056PPI ...1057:... I1058PPI disagree1059VVPdisagree ,1060,, and1061CCand I1062PPI will1063MDwill allow1064VVallow my1065PP$my friend1066NNfriend from1067INfrom the1068DTthe government1069NNgovernment to1070TOto explain1071VVexplain their1072PP$their position1073NNposition .1074SENT. But1075CCbut they1076PPthey 're1077VBPbe making1078VVGmake an1079DTan Exemption1080NPExemption 41081CD4 argument1082NNargument based1083VVNbase on1084INon the1085DTthe ...1086:... the1087DTthe ...1088:... what1089WPwhat they1090PPthey say1091VVPsay in1092INin part1093NNpart B1094NNB .1095SENT. 21096CD2 of1097INof their1098PP$their brief1099NNbrief .1100SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1101LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] They1102PPthey 're1103VBPbe trying1104VVGtry to1105TOto piggyback1106NNpiggyback their1107PP$their appeal1108NNappeal on1109INon you1110PPyou .1111SENT. [MR. YOUNG]1112LOC[MR. YOUNG] No1113NPNo ,1114,, I1115PPI ...1116:... I1117PPI disagree1118VVPdisagree with1119INwith that1120IN/thatthat as1121RBas well1122RBwell ,1123,, Justice1124NPJustice Sotomayor1125NPSotomayor .1126SENT. I1127PPI think1128VVPthink what1129WPwhat the1130DTthe government1131NNgovernment is1132VBZbe saying1133VVGsay is1134VBZbe we1135PPwe 've1136VHPhave had1137VHNhave four1138CDfour decades1139NNSdecade of1140INof the1141DTthe highest1142JJShigh level1143NNlevel promise1144NNpromise of1145INof confidentiality1146NNconfidentiality that1147IN/thatthat the1148DTthe government1149NNgovernment can1150MDcan make1151VVmake to1152TOto its1153PP$its citizens1154NNScitizen ,1155,, and1156CCand that1157WDTthat is1158VBZbe that1159IN/thatthat this1160DTthis kind1161NNkind of1162INof confidential1163JJconfidential information1164NNinformation ,1165,, we1166PPwe will1167MDwill protect1168VVprotect the1169DTthe confidentiality1170NNconfidentiality of1171INof it1172PPit .1173SENT. And1174CCand for1175INfor that1176DTthat reason1177NNreason ,1178,, even1179RBeven if1180INif the1181DTthe motivation1182NNmotivation that1183IN/thatthat they1184PPthey had1185VHDhave back1186RBback in1187INin 19791188CD@card@ for1189INfor starting1190VVGstart down1191RPdown that1192DTthat process1193NNprocess turns1194VVZturn out1195RPout to1196TOto be1197VBbe wrong1198JJwrong ,1199,, nonetheless1200RBnonetheless ,1201,, the1202DTthe promise1203NNpromise of1204INof confidentiality1205NNconfidentiality ,1206,, which1207WDTwhich Exemption1208NPExemption 41209CD4 and1210CCand not1211RBnot Exemption1212NPExemption 31213CD3 protects1214VVZprotect ,1215,, remains1216VVZremain .1217SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1218LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Mr1219NPMr .1220SENT. Young1221NPYoung ...1222:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]1223LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But1224CCbut was1225VBDbe n't1226RBn't the1227DTthe whole1228JJwhole purpose1229NNpurpose of1230INof ...1231:... FOIA1232NPFOIA says1233VVZsay disclose1234VVdisclose ,1235,, and1236CCand one1237CDone of1238INof the1239DTthe concerns1240NNSconcern was1241VBDbe the1242DTthe government1243NNgovernment official1244NNofficial ,1245,, for1246INfor one1247CDone reason1248NNreason or1249CCor another1250DTanother ,1251,, does1252VVZdo n't1253RBn't want1254VVwant to1255TOto disclose1256VVdisclose .1257SENT. There1258EXthere have1259VHPhave been1260VBNbe cases1261NNScase of1262INof a1263DTa captive1264JJcaptive agency1265NNagency ,1266,, for1267INfor example1268NNexample .1269SENT. So1270RBso ,1271,, to1272TOto ...1273:... to1274TOto say1275VVsay the1276DTthe government1277NNgovernment can1278MDcan control1279VVcontrol this1280DTthis by1281INby making1282VVGmake a1283DTa promise1284NNpromise that1285IN/thatthat it1286PPit won1287MDwill 't1288RB't disclose1289VVdisclose ,1290,, that1291WDTthat seems1292VVZseem to1293TOto run1294VVrun counter1295VVcounter to1296TOto the1297DTthe whole1298JJwhole idea1299NNidea of1300INof FOIA1301NPFOIA .1302SENT. [MR. YOUNG]1303LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well1304UHwell ,1305,, it1306PPit would1307MDwould perhaps1308RBperhaps run1309VVrun counter1310NNcounter to1311TOto the1312DTthe idea1313NNidea of1314INof FOIA1315NPFOIA if1316INif it1317PPit were1318VBDbe the1319DTthe kind1320NNkind of1321INof information1322NNinformation that1323WDTthat were1324VBDbe ...1325:... was1326VBDbe about1327RBabout the1328DTthe government1329NNgovernment 's1330POS's own1331JJown doings1332NNSdoing or1333CCor even1334RBeven ,1335,, conceivably1336RBconceivably ,1337,, something1338NNsomething that1339WDTthat 's1340VBZbe not1341RBnot presented1342VVNpresent here1343RBhere ,1344,, if1345INif there1346EXthere were1347VBDbe willy-nilly1348RBwilly-nilly ad1349NNad hoc1350FWhoc promises1351NNSpromise of1352INof confidentiality1353NNconfidentiality in1354INin which1355WDTwhich low-level1356JJlow-level employees1357NNSemployee could1358MDcould wave1359VVwave a1360DTa wand1361NNwand and1362CCand say1363VVPsay confidential1364JJconfidential ,1365,, confidential1366JJconfidential ,1367,, but1368CCbut I1369PPI think1370VVPthink that1371IN/thatthat what1372WPwhat this1373DTthis Court1374NPCourt has1375VHZhave repeatedly1376RBrepeatedly said1377VVNsay ...1378:... I1379PPI 'll1380MDwill mention1381VVmention the1382DTthe Department1383NPDepartment of1384INof Justice1385NPJustice versus1386CCversus the1387DTthe Reporters1388NNSreporter Committee1389NPCommittee case1390NNcase ,1391,, where1392WRBwhere the1393DTthe Court1394NPCourt says1395VVZsay :1396:: "1397``" Yes1398UHyes ,1399,, FOIA1400NPFOIA 's1401POS's basic1402JJbasic policy1403NNpolicy focuses1404VVZfocus on1405INon the1406DTthe citizens1407NNScitizen '1408POS' right1409NNright to1410TOto be1411VBbe informed1412VVNinform about1413INabout what1414WPwhat their1415PP$their government1416NNgovernment is1417VBZbe up1418RBup to1419TOto .1420SENT. "1421``" That1422DTthat 's1423VBZbe a1424DTa direct1425JJdirect quote1426NNquote .1427SENT. But1428CCbut then1429RBthen the1430DTthe Court1431NPCourt immediately1432RBimmediately says1433VVZsay that1434DTthat purpose1435NNpurpose ,1436,, however1437RBhowever ,1438,, is1439VBZbe not1440RBnot fostered1441VVNfoster by1442INby disclosure1443NNdisclosure of1444INof information1445NNinformation about1446INabout private1447JJprivate citizens1448NNScitizen that1449WDTthat has1450VHZhave accumulated1451VVNaccumulate in1452INin various1453JJvarious governmental1454JJgovernmental files1455NNSfile but1456CCbut that1457WDTthat reveals1458VVZreveal little1459JJlittle or1460CCor nothing1461NNnothing about1462INabout an1463DTan agency1464NNagency 's1465POS's own1466JJown conduct1467NNconduct .1468SENT. And1469CCand so1470RBso ,1471,, here1472RBhere ,1473,, what1474WPwhat we1475PPwe see1476VVPsee is1477VBZbe a1478DTa choice1479NNchoice .1480SENT. When1481WRBwhen a1482DTa SNAP1483JJsnap beneficiary1484NNbeneficiary receives1485VVZreceive an1486DTan allocation1487NNallocation from1488INfrom the1489DTthe government1490NNgovernment ,1491,, their1492PP$their choice1493NNchoice to1494TOto shop1495VVshop at1496INat this1497DTthis grocery1498NNgrocery store1499NNstore rather1500RBrather than1501INthan one1502CDone across1503INacross the1504DTthe street1505NNstreet is1506VBZbe in1507INin no1508DTno sense1509NNsense government1510NNgovernment action1511NNaction .1512SENT. It1513PPit is1514VBZbe the1515DTthe unmediated1516JJunmediated decision1517NNdecision of1518INof third1519JJthird parties1520NNSparty .1521SENT. It1522PPit tells1523VVZtell you1524PPyou ,1525,, in1526INin other1527JJother words1528NNSword ,1529,, an1530DTan awful1531JJawful lot1532NNlot about1533INabout Mrs1534NNMrs .1535SENT. Smith1536NPSmith or1537CCor Mr1538NPMr .1539SENT. Jones1540NPJones and1541CCand their1542PP$their choices1543NNSchoice ,1544,, and1545CCand it1546PPit tells1547VVZtell you1548PPyou a1549DTa lot1550NNlot about1551INabout how1552WRBhow those1553DTthose two1554CDtwo grocery1555NNgrocery stores1556NNSstore market1557NNmarket and1558CCand ...1559:... and1560CCand ...1561:... and1562CCand sell1563VVsell and1564CCand what1565WPwhat their1566PP$their selection1567NNselection might1568MDmight be1569VBbe .1570SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]1571LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I1572PPI do1573VVPdo n't1574RBn't doubt1575VVdoubt that1576IN/thatthat you1577PPyou 're1578VBPbe heard1579VVNhear .1580SENT. I1581PPI ...1582:... I1583PPI ...1584:... I1585PPI ...1586:... I1587PPI do1588VVPdo ...1589:... I1590PPI can1591MDcan 't1592RB't quite1593RBquite figure1594VVfigure out1595RPout how1596WRBhow this1597DTthis mootness1598NNmootness thing1599NNthing works1600NNSwork .1601SENT. It1602PPit seems1603VVZseem to1604TOto me1605PPme there1606EXthere are1607VBPbe two1608CDtwo laws1609NNSlaw ,1610,, A1611NPA and1612CCand B1613NPB .1614SENT. All1615DTall right1616NNright ?1617SENT? A1618DTa is1619VBZbe the1620DTthe ...1621:... the1622DTthe one1623CDone you1624PPyou 're1625VBPbe interested1626JJinterested in1627INin ,1628,, and1629CCand B1630NPB is1631VBZbe this1632DTthis other1633JJother one1634CDone that1635WDTthat stops1636VVZstop them1637PPthem from1638INfrom ...1639:... maybe1640RBmaybe ...1641:... from1642INfrom giving1643VVGgive out1644RPout information1645NNinformation .1646SENT. Now1647RBnow ,1648,, here1649RBhere ,1650,, you1651PPyou 're1652VBPbe attacking1653VVGattack A1654DTa ,1655,, so1656RBso I1657PPI 'm1658VBPbe asking1659VVGask ,1660,, does1661VVZdo A1662DTa cause1663VVcause you1664PPyou injury1665NNinjury ?1666SENT? Not1667RBnot does1668VVZdo B1669NPB cause1670VVcause you1671PPyou injury1672NNinjury .1673SENT. Now1674RBnow ,1675,, if1676INif B1677NPB stops1678VVZstop them1679PPthem from1680INfrom giving1681VVGgive out1682RPout the1683DTthe information1684NNinformation ,1685,, if1686INif you1687PPyou win1688VVPwin on1689INon A1690DTa ,1691,, you1692PPyou do1693VVPdo n't1694RBn't get1695VVget it1696PPit .1697SENT. If1698INif you1699PPyou lose1700VVPlose on1701INon A1702DTa ,1703,, you1704PPyou do1705VVPdo n't1706RBn't get1707VVget it1708PPit .1709SENT. If1710INif B1711NPB does1712VVZdo n't1713RBn't stop1714VVstop them1715PPthem from1716INfrom giving1717VVGgive out1718RPout information1719NNinformation ,1720,, if1721INif you1722PPyou win1723VVPwin on1724INon A1725DTa ,1726,, you1727PPyou get1728VVPget it1729PPit .1730SENT. If1731INif you1732PPyou do1733VVPdo n't1734RBn't ...1735:... see1736VVsee ,1737,, it1738PPit works1739VVZwork ...1740:... the1741DTthe ...1742:... the1743DTthe ...1744:... the1745DTthe result1746NNresult is1747VBZbe the1748DTthe same1749JJsame no1750DTno matter1751NNmatter how1752WRBhow we1753PPwe decide1754VVPdecide your1755PP$your case1756NNcase .1757SENT. We1758PPwe just1759RBjust do1760VVPdo n't1761RBn't know1762VVknow about1763INabout B1764NPB .1765SENT. Now1766RBnow have1767VHPhave I1768PPI got1769VVDget that1770DTthat right1771NNright ?1772SENT? And1773CCand if1774INif I1775PPI ...1776:... if1777INif I1778PPI 've1779VHPhave got1780VVNget that1781IN/thatthat right1782RBright ,1783,, I1784PPI ...1785:... I1786PPI do1787VVPdo n't1788RBn't know1789VVknow a1790DTa standing1791NNstanding case1792NNcase right1793NNright in1794INin point1795NNpoint or1796CCor a1797DTa mootness1798NNmootness case1799NNcase right1800NNright in1801INin point1802NNpoint .1803SENT. I1804PPI 'm1805VBPbe not1806RBnot sure1807JJsure what1808WPwhat to1809TOto do1810VVdo .1811SENT. [MR. YOUNG]1812LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well1813UHwell ...1814:... well1815RBwell ,1816,, if1817INif I1818PPI 'm1819VBPbe understanding1820VVGunderstand you1821PPyou ,1822,, Justice1823NPJustice Breyer1824NPBreyer ,1825,, I1826PPI ...1827:... I1828PPI do1829VVPdo n't1830RBn't think1831VVthink it1832PPit raises1833VVZraise either1834RBeither one1835CDone of1836INof those1837DTthose justiciability1838NNjusticiability questions1839NNSquestion because1840INbecause the1841DTthe Court1842NPCourt can1843MDcan have1844VHhave in1845INin reserve1846JJreserve many1847JJmany grounds1848NNSground that1849IN/thatthat the1850DTthe lower1851JJRlow courts1852NNScourt ,1853,, for1854INfor example1855NNexample ,1856,, may1857MDmay not1858RBnot have1859VHhave addressed1860VVNaddress .1861SENT. In1862INin Milner1863NPMilner ,1864,, I1865PPI mentioned1866VVDmention Exemption1867NPExemption 71868CD7 was1869VBDbe still1870RBstill there1871RBthere .1872SENT. Now1873RBnow ,1874,, if1875INif Exemption1876NPExemption 71877CD7 was1878VBDbe well1879RBwell taken1880VVNtake ,1881,, Exemption1882NPExemption 21883CD2 would1884MDwould n't1885RBn't have1886VHhave been1887VBNbe necessary1888JJnecessary .1889SENT. The1890DTthe Court1891NPCourt granted1892VVDgrant in1893INin Milner1894NPMilner to1895TOto resolve1896VVresolve what1897WPwhat Exemption1898NPExemption 21899CD2 meant1900VVDmean ,1901,, and1902CCand it1903PPit granted1904VVDgrant in1905INin this1906DTthis case1907NNcase to1908TOto resolve1909VVresolve what1910WPwhat Exemption1911NNexemption 41912CD4 means1913NNSmean .1914SENT. And1915CCand if1916INif you1917PPyou do1918VVPdo it1919PPit and1920CCand you1921PPyou reverse1922RBreverse ...1923:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1924LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] The1925DTthe problem1926NNproblem with1927INwith that1928DTthat in1929INin Milner1930NPMilner is1931VBZbe ...1932:... and1933CCand the1934DTthe big1935JJbig difference1936NNdifference is1937VBZbe that1938IN/thatthat the1939DTthe government1940NNgovernment chose1941VVDchoose not1942RBnot to1943TOto appeal1944VVappeal the1945DTthe ruling1946NNruling on1947INon Exemption1948NPExemption 41949CD4 ,1950,, so1951RBso it1952PPit acceded1953VVDaccede to1954TOto turning1955VVGturn it1956PPit over1957RPover under1958INunder that1959DTthat exemption1960NNexemption .1961SENT. And1962CCand under1963INunder Crystal1964NPCrystal City1965NPCity ,1966,, we1967PPwe said1968VVDsay they1969PPthey ...1970:... you1971PPyou ...1972:... they1973PPthey or1974CCor you1975PPyou can1976MDcan 't1977RB't appeal1978NNappeal that1979RBthat .1980SENT. And1981CCand you1982PPyou admit1983VVPadmit if1984INif that1985WDTthat was1986VBDbe all1987RBall of1988INof it1989PPit and1990CCand they1991PPthey had1992VHDhave chosen1993VVNchoose to1994TOto turn1995VVturn it1996PPit over1997RPover ,1998,, you1999PPyou would2000MDwould get2001VVget it2002PPit .2003SENT. So2004RBso now2005RBnow the2006DTthe question2007NNquestion is2008VBZbe can2009MDcan they2010PPthey ...2011:... and2012CCand they2013PPthey and2014CCand you2015PPyou do2016VVPdo an2017DTan end-run2018NNend-run around2019INaround Crystal2020NPCrystal City2021NPCity by2022INby simply2023RBsimply saying2024VVGsay ,2025,, no2026UHno ,2027,, we2028PPwe 're2029VBPbe really2030RBreally not2031RBnot going2032VVGgo to2033TOto turn2034VVturn it2035PPit over2036RPover because2037INbecause of2038INof something2039NNsomething else2040RBelse ,2041,, but2042CCbut we2043PPwe really2044RBreally did2045VVDdo n't2046RBn't want2047VVwant to2048TOto challenge2049VVchallenge Exemption2050NPExemption 42051CD4 at2052INat all2053DTall and2054CCand we2055PPwe were2056VBDbe going2057VVGgo to2058TOto turn2059VVturn it2060PPit over2061RPover because2062INbecause we2063PPwe did2064VVDdo n't2065RBn't really2066RBreally think2067VVthink the2068DTthe pricing2069NNpricing information2070NNinformation was2071VBDbe confidential2072JJconfidential back2073RBback then2074RBthen .2075SENT. But2076CCbut now2077RBnow we2078PPwe think2079VVPthink we2080PPwe 're2081VBPbe going2082VVGgo to2083TOto change2084VVchange our2085PP$our mind2086NNmind ...2087:... this2088DTthis is2089VBZbe how2090WRBhow I2091PPI 'm2092VBPbe reading2093VVGread the2094DTthe argument2095NNargument ...2096:... and2097CCand so2098RBso we2099PPwe 're2100VBPbe going2101VVGgo to2102TOto piggyback2103NNpiggyback on2104INon a2105DTa private2106JJprivate entity2107NNentity raising2108VVGraise an2109DTan issue2110NNissue that2111IN/thatthat we2112PPwe should2113MDshould have2114VHhave appealed2115VVNappeal on2116RPon .2117SENT. [MR. YOUNG]2118LOC[MR. YOUNG] Justice2119NPJustice Sotomayor2120NPSotomayor ,2121,, I2122PPI do2123VVPdo n't2124RBn't believe2125VVbelieve the2126DTthe government2127NNgovernment 's2128VBZbe piggybacking2129VVGpiggyback at2130INat all2131DTall .2132SENT. They2133PPthey 're2134VBPbe here2135RBhere as2136INas an2137DTan amicus2138NNamicus .2139SENT. And2140CCand it2141PPit is2142VBZbe we2143PPwe ,2144,, the2145DTthe Food2146NPFood Marketing2147NPMarketing Institute2148NPInstitute ...2149:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2150LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But2151CCbut why2152NNwhy ...2153:... why2154WRBwhy can2155MDcan you2156PPyou ,2157,, without2158INwithout getting2159VVGget stuck2160VVNstick in2161INin Crystal2162NPCrystal City2163NPCity ?2164SENT? [MR. YOUNG]2165LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well2166UHWell ,2167,, because2168RBbecause ...2169:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2170LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Just2171RBjust because2172INbecause they2173PPthey 've2174VHPhave said2175VVNsay I2176PPI won2177MDwill 't2178RB't turn2179VVturn it2180PPit over2181RPover ,2182,, but2183CCbut they2184PPthey 're2185VBPbe bound2186VVNbind to2187TOto turn2188VVturn it2189PPit over2190RPover right2191RBright now2192RBnow by2193INby a2194DTa judgment2195NNjudgment below2196RBbelow ,2197,, and2198CCand they2199PPthey have2200VHPhave n't2201RBn't asked2202VVNask the2203DTthe court2204NNcourt below2205RBbelow to2206TOto reconsider2207VVreconsider that2208DTthat judgment2209NNjudgment .2210SENT. [MR. YOUNG]2211LOC[MR. YOUNG] I2212PPI ...2213:... I2214PPI ...2215:... I2216PPI think2217VVPthink it2218PPit 's2219VBZbe as2220RBas simple2221JJsimple as2222RBas ...2223:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2224LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] They2225PPthey raised2226VVDraise Exemption2227NPExemption 32228CD3 .2229SENT. They2230PPthey lost2231VVDlose .2232SENT. A2233DTa change2234NNchange of2235INof law2236NNlaw has2237VHZhave happened2238VVNhappen .2239SENT. They2240PPthey should2241MDshould have2242VHhave moved2243VVNmove for2244INfor reconsideration2245NNreconsideration ,2246,, and2247CCand they2248PPthey did2249VVDdo n't2250RBn't .2251SENT. So2252RBso why2253WRBwhy are2254VBPbe n't2255RBn't they2256PPthey stuck2257VVDstick ?2258SENT? [MR. YOUNG]2259LOC[MR. YOUNG] Because2260INbecause we2261PPwe intervened2262VVDintervene ,2263,, and2264CCand the2265DTthe opportunity2266NNopportunity to2267TOto conclude2268VVconclude that2269IN/thatthat we2270PPwe are2271VBPbe not2272RBnot a2273DTa proper2274JJproper party2275NNparty to2276TOto be2277VBbe able2278JJable to2279TOto make2280VVmake any2281DTany of2282INof these2283DTthese merits2284NNSmerit inquiries2285NNSinquiry has2286VHZhave long2287RBlong since2288RBsince passed2289VVNpass .2290SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]2291LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Mr2292NPMr .2293SENT. Young2294NPYoung ,2295,, may2296MDmay I2297PPI ask2298VVask you2299PPyou a2300DTa question2301NNquestion about2302INabout your2303PP$your substantive2304JJsubstantive standard2305NNstandard ?2306SENT? You2307PPyou at2308INat some2309DTsome points2310NNSpoint in2311INin your2312PP$your brief2313NNbrief say2314VVPsay that2315IN/thatthat the2316DTthe question2317NNquestion is2318VBZbe simply2319RBsimply whether2320INwhether the2321DTthe information2322NNinformation is2323VBZbe private2324JJprivate ,2325,, private2326JJprivate being2327VBGbe a2328DTa synonym2329NNsynonym for2330INfor confidential2331JJconfidential .2332SENT. At2333INat other2334JJother points2335NNSpoint in2336INin your2337PP$your brief2338NNbrief ,2339,, you2340PPyou talk2341VVPtalk about2342RBabout whether2343INwhether the2344DTthe information2345NNinformation is2346VBZbe kept2347VVNkeep private2348JJprivate .2349SENT. To2350TOTo me2351PPme ,2352,, those2353DTthose two2354CDtwo things2355NNSthing are2356VBPbe a2357DTa little2358JJlittle bit2359NNbit different2360JJdifferent ,2361,, that2362IN/thatthat the2363DTthe idea2364NNidea of2365INof keeping2366VVGkeep something2367NNsomething private2368JJprivate is2369VBZbe not2370RBnot just2371RBjust that2372IN/thatthat the2373DTthe information2374NNinformation is2375VBZbe n't2376RBn't out2377RBout there2378RBthere in2379INin the2380DTthe world2381NNworld but2382CCbut that2383IN/thatthat you2384PPyou 're2385VBPbe doing2386VVGdo something2387NNsomething to2388TOto make2389VVmake sure2390JJsure that2391IN/thatthat the2392DTthe information2393NNinformation does2394VVZdo n't2395RBn't get2396VVget out2397RPout there2398RBthere in2399INin the2400DTthe world2401NNworld .2402SENT. So2403CCso which2404WDTwhich do2405VVPdo you2406PPyou think2407VVPthink is2408VBZbe the2409DTthe right2410JJright approach2411NNapproach in2412INin this2413DTthis case2414NNcase ?2415SENT? [MR. YOUNG]2416LOC[MR. YOUNG] I'll2417NPI'll ...2418:... I2419PPI 'll2420MDwill readily2421RBreadily agree2422VVagree with2423INwith the2424DTthe latter2425NNlatter .2426SENT. Our2427PP$our ...2428:... our2429PP$our argument2430NNargument is2431VBZbe not2432RBnot that2433IN/thatthat simply2434RBsimply marking2435VVGmark something2436NNsomething or2437CCor stamping2438VVGstamp it2439PPit confidential2440JJconfidential does2441VVZdo the2442DTthe trick2443NNtrick .2444SENT. We2445PPwe 've2446VHPhave had2447VHNhave 272448CD@card@ years2449NNSyear with2450INwith the2451DTthe D2452NPD .2453SENT. C2454LSc .2455SENT. Circu2456NPCircu it2457PPit 's2458VBZbe critical2459JJcritical mass2460NNmass case2461NNcase ,2462,, which2463WDTwhich essentially2464RBessentially adopts2465VVZadopt the2466DTthe position2467NNposition that2468IN/thatthat we2469PPwe think2470VVPthink correctly2471RBcorrectly defines2472VVZdefine the2473DTthe entirety2474NNentirety of2475INof Exemption2476NPExemption 42477CD4 .2478SENT. And2479CCand in2480INin critical2481JJcritical mass2482NNmass cases2483NNScase ,2484,, when2485WRBwhen a2486DTa party2487NNparty wants2488VVZwant the2489DTthe release2490NNrelease of2491INof some2492DTsome information2493NNinformation that2494IN/thatthat a2495DTa party2496NNparty like2497INlike us2498PPus might2499MDmight say2500VVsay that2501DTthat 's2502VBZbe our2503PP$our confidential2504JJconfidential commercial2505JJcommercial information2506NNinformation ,2507,, more2508JJRmore is2509VBZbe required2510VVNrequire and2511CCand you2512PPyou can2513MDcan be2514VBbe held2515VVNhold to2516TOto fail2517VVfail your2518PP$your Exemption2519NPExemption 42520CD4 argument2521NNargument if2522INif you2523PPyou do2524VVPdo n't2525RBn't illustrate2526VVillustrate how2527WRBhow you2528PPyou protect2529VVPprotect the2530DTthe information2531NNinformation .2532SENT. So2533RBso ,2534,, for2535INfor example2536NNexample ,2537,, what2538WPwhat is2539VBZbe relevant2540JJrelevant and2541CCand what2542WPwhat was2543VBDbe asked2544VVNask even2545RBeven in2546INin this2547DTthis very2548JJvery case2549NNcase ,2550,, in2551RBin ...2552:... in2553INin which2554WDTwhich these2555DTthese questions2556NNSquestion were2557VBDbe presented2558VVNpresent to2559TOto the2560DTthe trial2561NNtrial court2562NNcourt ,2563,, do2564VVPdo you2565PPyou bind2566VVbind it2567PPit with2568INwith nondisclosure2569NNnondisclosure agreements2570NNSagreement ?2571SENT? Do2572VVdo you2573PPyou have2574VHPhave security2575NNsecurity in2576INin place2577NNplace so2578INso that2579WDTthat it2580PPit limits2581VVZlimit the2582DTthe number2583NNnumber of2584INof people2585NNSpeople even2586RBeven internally2587RBinternally who2588WPwho have2589VHPhave access2590NNaccess to2591TOto it2592PPit ?2593SENT? How2594WRBHow do2595VVPdo you2596PPyou make2597VVPmake sure2598RBsure that2599IN/thatthat it2600PPit is2601VBZbe not2602RBnot supplied2603VVNsupply accidentally2604RBaccidentally in2605INin litigation2606NNlitigation ,2607,, for2608INfor example2609NNexample ?2610SENT? How2611WRBHow ,2612,, in2613INin other2614JJother words2615NNSword ,2616,, do2617VVPdo you2618PPyou make2619VVPmake sure2620RBsure that2621IN/thatthat it2622PPit does2623VVZdo n't2624RBn't become2625VVbecome public2626JJpublic ?2627SENT? Have2628VHPhave you2629PPyou made2630VVNmake sure2631RBsure that2632IN/thatthat comparable2633JJcomparable information2634NNinformation has2635VHZhave not2636RBnot been2637VBNbe made2638VVNmake public2639JJpublic in2640INin other2641JJother forums2642NNSforum ?2643SENT? And2644CCand so2645RBso there2646EXthere are2647VBPbe critical2648JJcritical mass2649JJmass cases2650NNScase ,2651,, decisions2652NNSdecision from2653INfrom the2654DTthe D2655NPD .2656SENT. C2657LSc .2658SENT. Circuit2659NNcircuit courts2660NNScourt and2661CCand from2662INfrom the2663DTthe Tenth2664JJtenth Circuit2665NNcircuit courts2666NNScourt that2667WDTthat apply2668VVPapply that2669IN/thatthat ,2670,, that2671WDTthat look2672VVPlook to2673TOto those2674DTthose exact2675JJexact types2676NNStype of2677INof questions2678NNSquestion and2679CCand say2680VVPsay :2681:: Well2682UHWell ,2683,, we2684PPwe can2685MDcan find2686VVfind something2687NNsomething rather2688RBrather like2689INlike this2690DTthis in2691INin publicly2692RBpublicly available2693JJavailable information2694NNinformation already2695RBalready .2696SENT. Your2697PP$your Exemption2698NPExemption 42699CD4 argument2700NNargument is2701VBZbe gone2702VVNgo .2703SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2704LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So2705RBso how2706WRBhow does2707VVZdo that2708DTthat dovetail2709NNdovetail with2710INwith the2711DTthe SG2712NPSG 's2713POS's position2714NNposition that2715IN/thatthat if2716INif they2717PPthey ask2718VVPask you2719PPyou to2720TOto turn2721VVturn over2722INover something2723NNsomething confidentially2724RBconfidentially ...2725:... and2726CCand you2727PPyou seemed2728VVDseem to2729TOto be2730VBbe arguing2731VVGargue that2732IN/thatthat earlier2733RBRearlier ...2734:... that2735IN/thatthat that2736DTthat 's2737VBZbe enough2738RBenough ,2739,, that2740IN/thatthat that2741WDTthat makes2742VVZmake it2743PPit confidential2744JJconfidential ?2745SENT? Because2746INbecause you2747PPyou 've2748VHPhave just2749RBjust said2750VVNsay to2751TOto me2752PPme something2753NNsomething quite2754RBquite different2755JJdifferent ,2756,, which2757WDTwhich is2758VBZbe it2759PPit 's2760VBZbe not2761RBnot the2762DTthe government2763NNgovernment 's2764POS's request2765NNrequest or2766CCor promise2767NNpromise to2768TOto keep2769VVkeep it2770PPit confidential2771JJconfidential ,2772,, but2773CCbut is2774VBZbe it2775PPit ,2776,, in2777INin fact2778NNfact ,2779,, kept2780VVNkeep in2781INin confidence2782NNconfidence the2783DTthe way2784NNway you2785PPyou 've2786VHPhave defined2787VVNdefine it2788PPit ?2789SENT? So2790RBso how2791WRBhow do2792VVPdo you2793PPyou dovetail2794VVdovetail the2795DTthe two2796CDtwo ?2797SENT? [MR. YOUNG]2798LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well2799UHwell ,2800,, I2801PPI would2802MDwould say2803VVsay that2804IN/thatthat even2805RBeven if2806INif the2807DTthe government2808NNgovernment gives2809VVZgive us2810PPus a2811DTa promise2812NNpromise of2813INof confidentiality2814NNconfidentiality ,2815,, that2816WDTthat fits2817VVZfit within2818INwithin the2819DTthe definition2820NNdefinition of2821INof what2822WPwhat confidential2823JJconfidential is2824VBZbe ,2825,, we2826PPwe now2827RBnow have2828VHPhave given2829VVNgive something2830NNsomething to2831TOto the2832DTthe government2833NNgovernment in2834INin confidence2835NNconfidence ,2836,, if2837INif we2838PPwe ,2839,, nonetheless2840RBnonetheless ,2841,, publish2842VVpublish it2843PPit ,2844,, if2845INif we2846PPwe 're2847VBPbe sloppy2848JJsloppy with2849INwith it2850PPit ,2851,, if2852INif we2853PPwe release2854VVPrelease it2855PPit in2856INin some2857DTsome other2858JJother way2859NNway ,2860,, then2861RBthen we2862PPwe have2863VHPhave breached2864VVNbreach the2865DTthe confidentiality2866NNconfidentiality ourselves2867PPourselves .2868SENT. And2869CCand I2870PPI would2871MDwould argue2872VVargue that2873DTthat someone2874NNsomeone like2875INlike that2876WDTthat is2877VBZbe no2878RBno longer2879RBRlonger protected2880VVNprotect by2881INby ...2882:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2883LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] How2884WRBHow about2885INabout the2886DTthe ...2887:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2888LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So2889INso the2890DTthe government2891NNgovernment 's2892POS's overlay2893NNoverlay is2894VBZbe really2895RBreally not2896RBnot necessary2897JJnecessary to2898TOto this2899DTthis case2900NNcase ?2901SENT? [MR. YOUNG]2902LOC[MR. YOUNG] It2903PPit 's2904VBZbe a2905DTa manifestation2906NNmanifestation of2907INof what2908WPwhat confidential2909JJconfidential is2910VBZbe .2911SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2912LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Man2913NNman ...2914:... but2915CCbut only2916RBonly a2917DTa point2918NNpoint of2919INof evidence2920NNevidence ,2921,, not2922RBnot a2923DTa point2924NNpoint that2925WDTthat binds2926VVZbind ?2927SENT? [MR. YOUNG]2928LOC[MR. YOUNG] I2929PPI ...2930:... I2931PPI guess2932VVPguess .2933SENT. I2934PPI 'm2935VBPbe not2936RBnot sure2937JJsure what2938WPwhat a2939DTa point2940NNpoint of2941INof evidence2942NNevidence means2943NNSmean .2944SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2945LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Meaning2946NNmeaning ,2947,, you2948PPyou say2949VVPsay a2950DTa manifestation2951NNmanifestation ,2952,, that2953IN/thatthat a2954DTa district2955NNdistrict court2956NNcourt judge2957NNjudge could2958MDcould look2959VVlook at2960INat that2961IN/thatthat as2962RBas among2963INamong many2964JJmany factors2965NNSfactor .2966SENT. [MR. YOUNG]2967LOC[MR. YOUNG] Yes2968NPYes ,2969,, I2970PPI ...2971:... I2972PPI would2973MDwould say2974VVsay that2975IN/thatthat if2976INif the2977DTthe government2978NNgovernment in2979INin a2980DTa proper2981JJproper form2982NNform ,2983,, if2984INif the2985DTthe government2986NNgovernment binds2987VVZbind itself2988PPitself here2989RBhere through2990INthrough notice-and-comment2991NNnotice-and-comment rulemaking2992VVGrulemak ...2993:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2994LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] If2995INif you2996PPyou ...2997:... if2998INif you2999PPyou leave3000VVPleave ...3001:... if3002INif you3003PPyou give3004VVPgive this3005DTthis information3006NNinformation to3007TOto your3008PP$your employees3009NNSemployee ,3010,, there3011EXthere 's3012VBZbe no3013DTno promise3014NNpromise of3015INof secrecy3016NNsecrecy and3017CCand ...3018:... [MR. YOUNG]3019LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well3020UHWell ,3021,, Landano3022NPLandano defined3023VVNdefine what3024WPwhat confidential3025JJconfidential meant3026VVNmean also3027RBalso ,3028,, and3029CCand it3030PPit recognized3031VVDrecognize that3032DTthat confidential3033JJconfidential does3034VVZdo not3035RBnot mean3036VVmean that3037DTthat nobody3038NNnobody knows3039VVZknow it3040PPit .3041SENT. It3042PPit means3043VVZmean that3044IN/thatthat you3045PPyou have3046VHPhave to3047TOto keep3048VVkeep it3049PPit within3050INwithin a3051DTa limited3052JJlimited universe3053NNuniverse .3054SENT. Mr3055NPMr .3056SENT. Chief3057NPChief Justice3058NPJustice ,3059,, if3060INif I3061PPI may3062MDmay reserve3063VVreserve the3064DTthe balance3065NNbalance of3066INof my3067PP$my time3068NNtime .3069SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3070LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank3071VVthank you3072PPyou ,3073,, counsel3074NNcounsel .3075SENT. Mr3076NPMr .3077SENT. Yang3078NPYang .3079SENT.

[MR. YANG]3080LOC[MR. YANG] Mr3081NPMr .3082SENT. Chief3083NPChief Justice3084NPJustice ,3085,, and3086CCand may3087MDmay it3088PPit please3089VVplease the3090DTthe Court3091NPCourt :3092:: Before3093INbefore I3094PPI address3095VVPaddress the3096DTthe merits3097NNSmerit ,3098,, I3099PPI 'd3100MDwould briefly3101RBbriefly like3102VVlike to3103TOto address3104VVaddress justiciability3105NNjusticiability and3106CCand be3107VBbe clear3108JJclear :3109:: The3110DTthe government3111NNgovernment will3112MDwill not3113RBnot release3114VVrelease the3115DTthe disputed3116JJdisputed records3117NNSrecord from3118INfrom 20053119CD@card@ to3120TOto 20103121CD@card@ if3122INif a3123DTa FOIA3124NPFOIA exemption3125NNexemption applies3126VVZapply .3127SENT. So3128RBso long3129RBlong as3130INas the3131DTthe government3132NNgovernment is3133VBZbe not3134RBnot judicially3135RBjudicially compelled3136VVNcompel to3137TOto do3138VVdo so3139RBso ,3140,, it3141PPit will3142MDwill not3143RBnot do3144VVdo so3145RBso .3146SENT. Petitioner3147NNpetitioner also3148RBalso had3149VHDhave Article3150NPArticle III3151NPIII standing3152NNstanding .3153SENT. That3154DTthat 's3155VBZbe evaluated3156VVNevaluate at3157INat the3158DTthe time3159NNtime they3160PPthey filed3161VVDfile the3162DTthe notice3163NNnotice of3164INof appeal3165NNappeal and3166CCand invoked3167VVDinvoke the3168DTthe appellate3169JJappellate court3170NNcourt 's3171POS's jurisdiction3172NNjurisdiction .3173SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]3174LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Is3175VBZbe that3176IN/thatthat true3177JJtrue if3178INif ...3179:... if3180INif the3181DTthe ...3182:... the3183DTthe other3184JJother statute3185NNstatute here3186RBhere were3187VBDbe held3188VVNhold not3189RBnot to3190TOto block3191VVblock the3192DTthe government3193NNgovernment from3194INfrom releasing3195VVGrelease it3196PPit ?3197SENT? [MR. YANG]3198LOC[MR. YANG] Yes3199NPYes .3200SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]3201LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] You3202PPyou mean3203VVPmean so3204RBso however3205RBhowever the3206DTthe other3207JJother statute3208NNstatute comes3209VVZcome out3210RPout ,3211,, the3212DTthe government3213NNgovernment now3214RBnow is3215VBZbe saying3216VVGsay ...3217:... I3218PPI did3219VVDdo n't3220RBn't get3221VVget this3222DTthis at3223INat the3224DTthe beginning3225NNbeginning ...3226:... we3227PPwe 're3228VBPbe not3229RBnot going3230VVGgo to3231TOto release3232VVrelease it3233PPit ...3234:... even3235RBeven if3236INif we3237PPwe have3238VHPhave every3239DTevery right3240NNright to3241TOto release3242VVrelease it3243PPit ,3244,, we3245PPwe 're3246VBPbe not3247RBnot going3248VVGgo to3249TOto release3250VVrelease it3251PPit ,3252,, even3253RBeven if3254INif we3255PPwe have3256VHPhave every3257DTevery right3258NNright to3259TOto do3260VVdo so3261RBso ?3262SENT? [MR. YANG]3263LOC[MR. YANG] It3264PPit would3265MDwould help3266VVhelp to3267TOto take3268VVtake a3269DTa look3270NNlook at3271INat Footnote3272NNfootnote 53273CD5 ...3274:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3275LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah3276NPYeah .3277SENT. [MR. YANG]3278LOC[MR. YANG] ...3279:... at3280INat page3281NNpage 263282CD@card@ of3283INof our3284PP$our brief3285NNbrief ,3286,, where3287WRBwhere we3288PPwe explain3289VVPexplain ...3290:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3291LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah3292NPYeah .3293SENT. [MR. YANG]3294LOC[MR. YANG] ...3295:... there3296EXthere would3297MDwould ...3298:... there3299EXthere is3300VBZbe a3301DTa policy3302NNpolicy interest3303NNinterest in3304INin USDA3305NPUSDA ,3306,, if3307INif they3308PPthey were3309VBDbe writing3310VVGwrite on3311INon a3312DTa clean3313JJclean slate3314NNslate ,3315,, going3316VVGgo prospectively3317RBprospectively ,3318,, that3319IN/thatthat they3320PPthey may3321MDmay well3322RBwell release3323VVrelease this3324DTthis information3325NNinformation and3326CCand they3327PPthey said3328VVDsay they3329PPthey likely3330RBlikely would3331MDwould .3332SENT. However3333RBhowever ,3334,, as3335INas we3336PPwe explain3337VVPexplain in3338INin Footnote3339NNfootnote 53340CD5 ,3341,, we3342PPwe said3343VVDsay ,3344,, if3345INif Congress3346NPCongress had3347VHDhave not3348RBnot amended3349VVNamend Section3350NPSection 20183351CD@card@ ,3352,, so3353INso that3354WDTthat 's3355VBZbe an3356DTan if3357INif ...3358:... the3359DTthe agency3360NNagency might3361MDmight have3362VHhave explored3363VVNexplore changing3364VVGchange its3365PP$its position3366NNposition .3367SENT. It3368PPit has3369VHZhave not3370RBnot changed3371VVNchange its3372PP$its position3373NNposition ,3374,, one3375CDone .3376SENT. Two3377CDTwo ,3378,, and3379CCand then3380RBthen we3381PPwe go3382VVPgo on3383INon to3384TOto say3385VVsay ,3386,, to3387TOto release3388VVrelease store-level3389JJstore-level redemption3390NNredemption data3391NNSdatum collected3392VVNcollect after3393INafter such3394PDTsuch a3395DTa change3396NNchange .3397SENT. In3398INin other3399JJother words3400NNSword ,3401,, the3402DTthe data3403NNSdatum collected3404VVNcollect before3405INbefore the3406DTthe change3407NNchange when3408WRBwhen we3409PPwe have3410VHPhave provided3411VVNprovide an3412DTan assurance3413NNassurance of3414INof confidentiality3415NNconfidentiality ,3416,, in3417INin notice-and-comment3418NNnotice-and-comment rulemaking3419VVGrulemak go3420NNgo back3421RBback ...3422:... going3423VVGgo back3424RBback 403425CD@card@ years3426NNSyear ,3427,, the3428DTthe government3429NNgovernment is3430VBZbe not3431RBnot voluntarily3432RBvoluntarily releasing3433VVGrelease that3434IN/thatthat on3435INon the3436DTthe basis3437NNbasis of3438INof having3439VHGhave to3440TOto do3441VVdo so3442RBso .3443SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]3444LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I3445PPI know3446VVPknow ,3447,, but3448CCbut you3449PPyou sounded3450VVDsound in3451INin that3452DTthat footnote3453NNfootnote as3454RBas if3455INif you3456PPyou were3457VBDbe saying3458VVGsay that3459IN/thatthat the3460DTthe reason3461NNreason we3462PPwe 're3463VBPbe not3464RBnot releasing3465VVGrelease it3466PPit is3467VBZbe because3468INbecause of3469INof new3470JJnew 20183471CD@card@ .3472SENT. [MR. YANG]3473LOC[MR. YANG] Well3474UHWell ,3475,, the3476DTthe reason3477NNreason we3478PPwe 're3479VBPbe not3480RBnot releasing3481VVGrelease anything3482NNanything ,3483,, whether3484INwhether before3485INbefore or3486CCor after3487INafter ...3488:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3489LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No3490NPNo ,3491,, but3492CCbut just3493RBjust answer3494VVanswer ...3495:... look3496VVlook at3497INat my3498PP$my ...3499:... look3500VVlook at3501INat my3502PP$my question3503NNquestion .3504SENT. I3505PPI 'm3506VBPbe trying3507VVGtry to3508TOto figure3509VVfigure out3510RPout whether3511INwhether I3512PPI have3513VHPhave a3514DTa question3515NNquestion here3516RBhere .3517SENT. [MR. YANG]3518LOC[MR. YANG] Right3519NPRight .3520SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]3521LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And3522CCand ...3523:... and3524CCand if3525INif ...3526:... if3527INif you3528PPyou 're3529VBPbe going3530VVGgo to3531TOto tell3532VVtell me3533PPme I3534PPI do3535VVPdo n't3536RBn't care3537VVcare if3538INif 20183539CD@card@ never3540RBnever appeared3541VVNappear ,3542,, does3543VVZdo n't3544RBn't appear3545VVappear ,3546,, does3547VVZdo n't3548RBn't exist3549VVexist ,3550,, we3551PPwe still3552RBstill won3553MDwill 't3554RB't release3555VVrelease it3556PPit ,3557,, which3558WDTwhich is3559VBZbe your3560PP$your right3561NNright in3562INin the3563DTthe absence3564NNabsence of3565INof ...3566:... of3567INof ...3568:... [MR. YANG]3569LOC[MR. YANG] I3570PPI would3571MDwould say3572VVsay that3573DTthat 's3574VBZbe partially3575RBpartially right3576JJright .3577SENT. The3578DTthe reason3579NNreason we3580PPwe 're3581VBPbe not3582RBnot releasing3583VVGrelease it3584PPit is3585VBZbe because3586INbecause we3587PPwe have3588VHPhave made3589VVNmake assurances3590NNSassurance of3591INof confidentiality3592NNconfidentiality at3593INat pages3594NNSpage 303595CD@card@ to3596TOto 313597CD@card@ of3598INof our3599PP$our brief3600NNbrief .3601SENT. We3602PPwe explained3603VVDexplain that3604IN/thatthat that3605WDTthat was3606VBDbe motivated3607VVNmotivate by3608INby Section3609NPSection 20183610CD@card@ (3611(( c3612LSc )3613)) .3614SENT. But3615CCbut even3616RBeven if3617INif we3618PPwe were3619VBDbe ...3620:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3621LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] All3622DTall right3623NNright .3624SENT. So3625RBso what3626WPwhat happens3627VVZhappen if3628INif 20183629CD@card@ (3630(( c3631LSc )3632)) now3633RBnow is3634VBZbe wiped3635VVNwipe from3636INfrom the3637DTthe books3638NNSbook ?3639SENT? [MR. YANG]3640LOC[MR. YANG] As3641INas I3642PPI was3643VBDbe explaining3644VVGexplain ...3645:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3646LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Will3647MDwill you3648PPyou release3649VVrelease it3650PPit ?3651SENT? [MR. YANG]3652LOC[MR. YANG] As3653INas I3654PPI was3655VBDbe ...3656:... no3657UHno .3658SENT. As3659INas I3660PPI was3661VBDbe explaining3662VVGexplain ...3663:... [JUSTICE BREYER]3664LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No3665NPNo ?3666SENT? Okay3667JJokay .3668SENT. [MR. YANG]3669LOC[MR. YANG] ...3670:... on3671INon page3672NNpage 303673CD@card@ to3674TOto 313675CD@card@ of3676INof our3677PP$our brief3678NNbrief ,3679,, even3680RBeven if3681INif we3682PPwe were3683VBDbe wrong3684JJwrong about3685INabout 20183686CD@card@ (3687(( c3688LSc )3689)) ,3690,, the3691DTthe fact3692NNfact that3693IN/thatthat it3694PPit was3695VBDbe reasonable3696JJreasonable ,3697,, it3698PPit was3699VBDbe objectively3700RBobjectively reasonable3701JJreasonable in3702INin light3703NNlight of3704INof the3705DTthe government3706NNgovernment 's3707POS's assurances3708NNSassurance for3709INfor 403710CD@card@ years3711NNSyear to3712TOto understand3713VVunderstand the3714DTthe government3715NNgovernment to3716TOto be3717VBbe providing3718VVGprovide an3719DTan assurance3720NNassurance of3721INof confidentiality3722NNconfidentiality ,3723,, and3724CCand we3725PPwe understand3726VVPunderstand these3727DTthese retailers3728NNSretailer to3729TOto have3730VHhave done3731VVNdo so3732RBso ,3733,, to3734TOto be3735VBbe relying3736VVGrely on3737INon that3738DTthat ...3739:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]3740LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Mr3741NPMr .3742SENT. Yang3743NPYang ,3744,, let3745VVDlet me3746PPme see3747VVPsee 63748CD6 if3749INif ...3750:... [MR. YANG]3751LOC[MR. YANG] ...3752:... we3753PPwe 're3754VBPbe not3755RBnot going3756VVGgo to3757TOto release3758VVrelease it3759PPit as3760INas a3761DTa matter3762NNmatter of3763INof good3764JJgood government3765NNgovernment .3766SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3767LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Mr3768NPMr .3769SENT. Yang3770NPYang ,3771,, you3772PPyou are3773VBPbe going3774VVGgo to3775TOto tell3776VVtell me3777PPme that3778IN/thatthat you3779PPyou were3780VBDbe going3781VVGgo to3782TOto be3783VBbe in3784INin contempt3785NNcontempt on3786INon the3787DTthe order3788NNorder below3789RBbelow ?3790SENT? [MR. YANG]3791LOC[MR. YANG] Of3792INof course3793NNcourse not3794RBnot .3795SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3796LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] The3797DTthe order3798NNorder below3799RBbelow ,3800,, you3801PPyou litigated3802VVDlitigate Exemption3803NPExemption 33804CD3 .3805SENT. [MR. YANG]3806LOC[MR. YANG] Of3807INof course3808NNcourse not3809RBnot .3810SENT. If3811INif we3812PPwe were3813VBDbe ...3814:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3815LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] The3816DTthe court3817NNcourt ...3818:... the3819DTthe court3820NNcourt ...3821:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3822LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Could3823MDcould I3824PPI hear3825VVhear his3826PP$his answer3827NNanswer ,3828,, please3829UHplease ?3830SENT? [MR. YANG]3831LOC[MR. YANG] Of3832INof course3833NNcourse not3834RBnot .3835SENT. If3836INif we3837PPwe were3838VBDbe compelled3839VVNcompel to3840TOto do3841VVdo so3842RBso by3843INby a3844DTa court3845NNcourt ,3846,, we3847PPwe will3848MDwill do3849VVdo so3850RBso .3851SENT. But3852CCbut if3853INif we3854PPwe have3855VHPhave discretion3856NNdiscretion to3857TOto do3858VVdo so3859RBso ...3860:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3861LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But3862CCbut wait3863VVwait a3864DTa minute3865NNminute ,3866,, there3867EXthere is3868VBZbe no3869DTno discretion3870NNdiscretion .3871SENT. Let3872VVlet 's3873VBZbe assume3874VVassume there3875EXthere 's3876VBZbe no3877DTno 20183878CD@card@ (3879(( c3880LSc )3881)) amendment3882NNamendment .3883SENT. You3884PPyou litigated3885VVDlitigate Exemption3886NPExemption 33887CD3 .3888SENT. You3889PPyou lost3890VVDlose .3891SENT. You3892PPyou litigated3893VVDlitigate Exemption3894NPExemption 43895CD4 .3896SENT. You3897PPyou lost3898VVDlose .3899SENT. [MR. YANG]3900LOC[MR. YANG] I3901PPI ...3902:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3903LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] You3904PPyou were3905VBDbe ordered3906VVNorder to3907TOto disclose3908VVdisclose ...3909:... [MR. YANG]3910LOC[MR. YANG] I3911PPI think3912VVPthink there3913EXthere 's3914VBZbe some3915DTsome confusion3916NNconfusion in3917INin the3918DTthe question3919NNquestion .3920SENT. 20183921CD@card@ (3922(( c3923LSc )3924)) prohibits3925VVZprohibit the3926DTthe government3927NNgovernment from3928INfrom releasing3929VVGrelease .3930SENT. It3931PPit does3932VVZdo not3933RBnot ...3934:... so3935RBso ,3936,, if3937INif 20183938CD@card@ (3939(( c3940LSc )3941)) is3942VBZbe taken3943VVNtake off3944INoff the3945DTthe table3946NNtable ,3947,, we3948PPwe still3949RBstill have3950VHPhave discretion3951NNdiscretion .3952SENT. And3953CCand we3954PPwe are3955VBPbe exercising3956VVGexercise our3957PP$our discretion3958NNdiscretion in3959INin a3960DTa matter3961NNmatter of3962INof good3963JJgood government3964NNgovernment .3965SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3966LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] No3967NPNo ,3968,, but3969CCbut I3970PPI 'm3971VBPbe sorry3972JJsorry ,3973,, but3974CCbut once3975RBonce you3976PPyou did3977VVDdo n't3978RBn't ...3979:... [MR. YANG]3980LOC[MR. YANG] The3981DTthe Court3982NPCourt has3983VHZhave repeated3984VVNrepeat ...3985:... the3986DTthe Court3987NNcourt recognized3988VVNrecognize in3989INin a3990DTa ...3991:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3992LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...3993:... once3994RBonce you3995PPyou did3996VVDdo n't3997RBn't appeal3998VVappeal ...3999:... forget4000VVforget about4001INabout the4002DTthe amendment4003NNamendment ...4004:... you4005PPyou did4006VVDdo n't4007RBn't appeal4008VVappeal ,4009,, would4010MDwould you4011PPyou have4012VHPhave had4013VHDhave to4014TOto turn4015VVturn over4016INover the4017DTthe material4018NNmaterial ?4019SENT? [MR. YANG]4020LOC[MR. YANG] No4021NPNo .4022SENT. So4023RBso long4024RBlong as4025INas a4026DTa party4027NNparty is4028VBZbe appealing4029VVGappeal ...4030:... a4031DTa party4032NNparty ,4033,, they4034PPthey became4035VVDbecome a4036DTa party4037NNparty ,4038,, is4039VBZbe appealing4040VVGappeal .4041SENT. This4042DTthis is4043VBZbe an4044DTan indivisible4045JJindivisible judgment4046NNjudgment .4047SENT. It4048PPit 's4049VBZbe not4050RBnot like4051INlike a4052DTa money4053NNmoney judgment4054NNjudgment that4055IN/thatthat they4056PPthey say4057VVPsay the4058DTthe government4059NNgovernment owes4060VVZowe $4061$$ 54062CD5 and4063CCand party4064NNparty A4065DTa owes4066VVZowe $4067$$ 104068CD@card@ ,4069,, and4070CCand if4071INif the4072DTthe government4073NNgovernment owes4074VVZowe ...4075:... you4076PPyou know4077VVPknow ,4078,, does4079VVZdo n't4080RBn't appeal4081VVappeal ,4082,, it4083PPit 's4084VBZbe going4085VVGgo to4086TOto owe4087VVowe $4088$$ 54089CD5 .4090SENT. This4091DTthis is4092VBZbe the4093DTthe same4094JJsame thing4095NNthing .4096SENT. Any4097DTany party4098NNparty can4099MDcan bring4100VVbring that4101IN/thatthat up4102RBup ,4103,, and4104CCand if4105INif the4106DTthe judgment4107NNjudgment below4108INbelow requiring4109VVGrequire the4110DTthe government4111NNgovernment and4112CCand the4113DTthe general4114JJgeneral disclosure4115NNdisclosure is4116VBZbe taken4117VVNtake off4118INoff the4119DTthe books4120NNSbook ,4121,, we4122PPwe 're4123VBPbe no4124RBno longer4125RBRlonger bound4126JJbound .4127SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4128LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Perhaps4129RBperhaps in4130INin your4131PP$your remaining4132VVGremain time4133NNtime you4134PPyou could4135MDcould turn4136VVturn to4137TOto the4138DTthe merits4139NNSmerit .4140SENT. [MR. YANG]4141LOC[MR. YANG] Sure4142NPSure .4143SENT. We4144PPwe believe4145VVPbelieve that4146IN/thatthat the4147DTthe information4148NNinformation here4149RBhere is4150VBZbe ...4151:... the4152DTthe store-level4153JJstore-level redemption4154NNredemption data4155NNSdatum is4156VBZbe confidential4157JJconfidential because4158INbecause it4159PPit 's4160VBZbe reasonably4161RBreasonably understood4162VVNunderstand in4163INin context4164NNcontext to4165TOto have4166VHhave been4167VBNbe communicated4168VVNcommunicate in4169INin confidence4170NNconfidence and4171CCand held4172JJheld secret4173NNsecret .4174SENT. Now4175RBnow the4176DTthe government4177NNgovernment has4178VHZhave had4179VHNhave 404180CD@card@ years4181NNSyear of4182INof express4183JJexpress assurances4184NNSassurance of4185INof confidentiality4186NNconfidentiality embodied4187VVNembody in4188INin regulations4189NNSregulation and4190CCand in4191INin an4192DTan ongoing4193JJongoing dialogue4194NNdialogue with4195INwith Congress4196NPCongress about4197INabout these4198DTthese regulations4199NNSregulation ,4200,, showing4201VVGshow that4202IN/thatthat the4203DTthe store4204NNstore redemption4205NNredemption data4206NNSdatum was4207VBDbe communicated4208VVNcommunicate in4209INin confidence4210NNconfidence because4211INbecause we4212PPwe would4213MDwould not4214RBnot disclose4215VVdisclose it4216PPit .4217SENT. The4218DTthe first4219JJfirst ...4220:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]4221LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] May4222MDmay I4223PPI ask4224VVask you4225PPyou ...4226:... may4227MDmay I4228PPI ask4229VVask you4230PPyou the4231DTthe same4232JJsame question4233NNquestion ...4234:... [MR. YANG]4235LOC[MR. YANG] Sure4236NPSure .4237SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]4238LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...4239:... that4240IN/thatthat I4241PPI asked4242VVDask your4243PP$your fellow4244JJfellow counsel4245NNcounsel ?4246SENT? That4247DTthat is4248VBZbe ,4249,, one4250CDone of4251INof the4252DTthe aims4253NNSaim of4254INof FOIA4255NPFOIA was4256VBDbe to4257TOto ...4258:... FOIA4259NPFOIA was4260VBDbe to4261TOto make4262VVmake information4263NNinformation public4264NNpublic despite4265INdespite official4266NNofficial ...4267:... [MR. YANG]4268LOC[MR. YANG] Yes4269NPYes .4270SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]4271LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...4272:... willingness4273NNwillingness .4274SENT. [MR. YANG]4275LOC[MR. YANG] I4276PPI ...4277:... I4278PPI think4279VVPthink that4280WDTthat 's4281VBZbe right4282JJright ,4283,, and4284CCand that4285DTthat is4286VBZbe certainly4287RBcertainly FOIA4288NPFOIA 's4289POS's general4290JJgeneral goal4291NNgoal ,4292,, but4293CCbut ,4294,, in4295INin this4296DTthis exemption4297NNexemption ,4298,, it4299PPit only4300RBonly targets4301VVZtarget a4302DTa particular4303JJparticular type4304NNtype of4305INof information4306NNinformation ,4307,, not4308RBnot general4309JJgeneral .4310SENT. It4311PPit is4312VBZbe information4313NNinformation that4314WDTthat is4315VBZbe private4316JJprivate information4317NNinformation ,4318,, it4319PPit 's4320VBZbe obtained4321VVNobtain outside4322INoutside the4323DTthe government4324NNgovernment ,4325,, it4326PPit 's4327VBZbe about4328RBabout private4329JJprivate entities4330NNSentity ,4331,, that4332WDTthat is4333VBZbe ,4334,, either4335CCeither commercial4336JJcommercial or4337CCor financial4338JJfinancial .4339SENT. And4340CCand in4341INin that4342DTthat narrow4343JJnarrow ambit4344NNambit of4345INof commercial4346JJcommercial or4347CCor financial4348JJfinancial information4349NNinformation ,4350,, Congress4351NPCongress made4352VVDmake the4353DTthe policy4354NNpolicy judgment4355NNjudgment that4356IN/thatthat when4357WRBwhen that4358DTthat is4359VBZbe reasonably4360RBreasonably understood4361VVNunderstand to4362TOto be4363VBbe confidential4364JJconfidential ,4365,, it4366PPit should4367MDshould not4368RBnot be4369VBbe disclosed4370VVNdisclose .4371SENT. Exemption4372NNexemption ...4373:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4374LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] If4375INif I4376PPI understand4377VVPunderstand your4378PP$your argument4379NNargument ,4380,, Mr4381NPMr .4382SENT. Yang4383NPYang ,4384,, you4385PPyou kind4386RBkind of4387INof have4388VHPhave two4389CDtwo prongs4390NNSprong ,4391,, two4392CDtwo ways4393NNSway of4394INof saying4395VVGsay that4396DTthat something4397NNsomething is4398VBZbe confidential4399JJconfidential .4400SENT. One4401PPone is4402VBZbe just4403RBjust like4404INlike Mr4405NPMr .4406SENT. Young4407NPYoung 's4408POS's or4409CCor something4410NNsomething like4411INlike it4412PPit ...4413:... something4414NNsomething like4415INlike it4416PPit ,4417,, and4418CCand we4419PPwe ...4420:... and4421CCand the4422DTthe other4423JJother is4424VBZbe this4425DTthis assurances4426NNSassurance point4427NNpoint .4428SENT. Is4429VBZbe that4430DTthat right4431NNright ?4432SENT? [MR. YANG]4433LOC[MR. YANG] Yes4434NPYes .4435SENT. That4436DTthat ...4437:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4438LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Your4439PP$your ...4440:... [MR. YANG]4441LOC[MR. YANG] ...4442:... those4443DTthose are4444VBPbe manifestations4445NNSmanifestation .4446SENT. We4447PPwe think4448VVPthink the4449DTthe ...4450:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4451LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Am4452NPAm I4453PPI ...4454:... am4455VBPbe I4456PPI ...4457:... [MR. YANG]4458LOC[MR. YANG] ...4459:... meaning4460VVGmean of4461INof confidential4462JJconfidential ...4463:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]4464LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...4465:... am4466VBPbe I4467PPI ...4468:... am4469VBPbe I4470PPI right4471JJright that4472IN/thatthat you4473PPyou 're4474VBPbe relying4475VVGrely here4476RBhere on4477INon the4478DTthe assurances4479NNSassurance point4480NNpoint ?4481SENT? [MR. YANG]4482LOC[MR. YANG] We4483PPwe are4484VBPbe ,4485,, because4486INbecause we4487PPwe think4488VVPthink it4489PPit 's4490VBZbe a4491DTa little4492RBlittle more4493RBRmore complicated4494JJcomplicated .4495SENT. This4496DTthis is4497VBZbe ,4498,, in4499INin our4500PP$our view4501NNview ,4502,, an4503DTan objective4504JJobjective test4505NNtest ,4506,, and4507CCand you4508PPyou have4509VHPhave to4510TOto take4511VVtake it4512PPit in4513INin context4514NNcontext .4515SENT. And4516CCand the4517DTthe context4518NNcontext here4519RBhere is4520VBZbe more4521RBRmore complicated4522VVNcomplicate than4523INthan a4524DTa normal4525JJnormal Exemption4526NPExemption 44527CD4 case4528NNcase because4529INbecause the4530DTthe government4531NNgovernment 's4532POS's own4533JJown actions4534NNSaction of4535INof paying4536VVGpay money4537NNmoney is4538VBZbe intertwined4539VVNintertwine closely4540RBclosely with4541INwith the4542DTthe information4543NNinformation submitted4544VVNsubmit to4545TOto it4546PPit ,4547,, which4548WDTwhich is4549VBZbe why4550WRBwhy we4551PPwe think4552VVPthink the4553DTthe easier4554JJReasy path4555NNpath in4556INin this4557DTthis context4558NNcontext is4559VBZbe to4560TOto ...4561:... where4562WRBwhere there4563EXthere has4564VHZhave been4565VBNbe 404566CD@card@ years4567NNSyear of4568INof notice-and-comment4569NNnotice-and-comment regulations4570NNSregulation by4571INby a4572DTa high4573JJhigh ,4574,, high4575JJhigh level4576NNlevel of4577INof government4578NNgovernment sign-off4579NNsign-off ,4580,, right4581RBright ,4582,, this4583DTthis has4584VHZhave to4585TOto be4586VBbe the4587DTthe agency4588NNagency administrator4589NNadministrator that4590WDTthat signs4591VVZsign off4592RPoff on4593INon these4594DTthese ,4595,, that4596RBthat ,4597,, where4598WRBwhere it4599PPit 's4600VBZbe objectively4601RBobjectively reasonable4602JJreasonable ,4603,, provides4604VVZprovide an4605DTan assurance4606NNassurance of4607INof confidentiality4608NNconfidentiality that4609WDTthat ...4610:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4611LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] When4612WRBwhen can4613MDcan ...4614:... when4615WRBwhen can4616MDcan it4617PPit be4618VBbe deemed4619VVNdeem confidential4620JJconfidential as4621INas a4622DTa matter4623NNmatter of4624INof law4625NNlaw ,4626,, even4627RBeven without4628INwithout such4629JJsuch assurances4630NNSassurance ?4631SENT? [MR. YANG]4632LOC[MR. YANG] I4633PPI think4634VVPthink this4635DTthis confidential4636JJconfidential question4637NNquestion ultimately4638RBultimately is4639VBZbe a4640DTa question4641NNquestion that4642WDTthat requires4643VVZrequire factual4644JJfactual context4645NNcontext .4646SENT. You4647PPyou do4648VVPdo n't4649RBn't know4650VVknow if4651INif information4652NNinformation is4653VBZbe ...4654:... is4655VBZbe confidential4656JJconfidential without4657INwithout understanding4658VVGunderstand the4659DTthe context4660NNcontext in4661INin which4662WDTwhich it4663PPit 's4664VBZbe either4665RBeither treated4666VVNtreat public4667NNpublic ...4668:... in4669INin the4670DTthe general4671JJgeneral sphere4672NNsphere before4673INbefore it4674PPit 's4675VBZbe obtained4676VVNobtain by4677INby the4678DTthe government4679NNgovernment or4680CCor understanding4681NNunderstanding how4682WRBhow it4683PPit comes4684VVZcome into4685INinto the4686DTthe government4687NNgovernment 's4688POS's possession4689NNpossession .4690SENT. So4691RBso there4692EXthere are4693VBPbe ...4694:... we4695PPwe think4696VVPthink as4697INas a4698DTa matter4699NNmatter of4700INof law4701NNlaw ...4702:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4703LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Can4704MDcan it4705PPit ...4706:... can4707MDcan it4708PPit be4709VBbe deemed4710VVNdeem confidential4711JJconfidential even4712RBeven in4713INin cases4714NNScase without4715INwithout government4716NNgovernment assurance4717NNassurance ?4718SENT? I4719PPI 'll4720MDwill ask4721VVask it4722PPit a4723DTa different4724JJdifferent way4725NNway .4726SENT. [MR. YANG]4727LOC[MR. YANG] Oh4728NPOh ...4729:... oh4730UHoh ,4731,, sure4732JJsure ,4733,, sure4734JJsure .4735SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4736LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And4737CCand what4738WPwhat factors4739NNSfactor would4740MDwould determine4741VVdetermine that4742DTthat ?4743SENT? [MR. YANG]4744LOC[MR. YANG] Well4745UHWell ,4746,, that4747WDTthat 's4748VBZbe the4749DTthe first4750JJfirst manifestation4751NNmanifestation of4752INof what4753WPwhat 's4754VBZbe confidential4755JJconfidential .4756SENT. Just4757RBjust to4758TOto be4759VBbe clear4760JJclear ,4761,, we4762PPwe think4763VVPthink ...4764:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4765LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And4766CCand do4767VVPdo you4768PPyou have4769VHPhave any4770DTany disagreement4771NNdisagreement with4772INwith Petitioners4773NNSpetitioner on4774INon how4775WRBhow they4776PPthey articulate4777VVParticulate that4778DTthat first4779JJfirst ...4780:... [MR. YANG]4781LOC[MR. YANG] I4782PPI do4783VVPdo n't4784RBn't think4785VVthink so4786RBso except4787INexcept that4788IN/thatthat we4789PPwe think4790VVPthink you4791PPyou have4792VHPhave to4793TOto take4794VVtake the4795DTthe full4796JJfull context4797NNcontext into4798INinto account4799NNaccount .4800SENT. And4801CCand when4802WRBwhen you4803PPyou do4804VVPdo that4805IN/thatthat here4806RBhere ,4807,, the4808DTthe inquiry4809NNinquiry is4810VBZbe more4811RBRmore complicated4812JJcomplicated .4813SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4814LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So4815RBso ,4816,, as4817INas I4818PPI understood4819VVDunderstand your4820PP$your brief4821NNbrief ,4822,, and4823CCand tell4824VVtell me4825PPme if4826INif I4827PPI 've4828VHPhave gotten4829VVNget this4830DTthis wrong4831JJwrong ,4832,, you4833PPyou 're4834VBPbe basically4835RBbasically saying4836VVGsay that4837IN/thatthat the4838DTthe first4839JJfirst way4840NNway of4841INof showing4842VVGshow confidentiality4843NNconfidentiality ,4844,, the4845DTthe non-assurances4846NNSnon-assurances way4847NNway ...4848:... [MR. YANG]4849LOC[MR. YANG] Right4850NPRight .4851SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]4852LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...4853:... is4854VBZbe n't4855RBn't really4856RBreally met4857VVNmeet here4858RBhere because4859INbecause what4860WPwhat they4861PPthey 're4862VBPbe seeking4863VVGseek to4864TOto protect4865VVprotect is4866VBZbe something4867NNsomething ...4868:... is4869VBZbe ...4870:... is4871VBZbe information4872NNinformation that4873IN/thatthat essentially4874RBessentially the4875DTthe government4876NNgovernment reveals4877VVZreveal all4878PDTall the4879DTthe time4880NNtime by4881INby virtue4882NNvirtue of4883INof its4884PP$its payments4885NNSpayment .4886SENT. Is4887VBZbe that4888IN/thatthat correct4889JJcorrect ?4890SENT? [MR. YANG]4891LOC[MR. YANG] I4892PPI think4893VVPthink it4894PPit 's4895VBZbe close4896JJclose .4897SENT. We4898PPwe 're4899VBPbe a4900DTa little4901JJlittle bit4902NNbit more4903RBRmore agnostic4904JJagnostic .4905SENT. We4906PPwe think4907VVPthink that4908IN/thatthat that4909DTthat is4910VBZbe a4911DTa hard4912JJhard question4913NNquestion and4914CCand we4915PPwe 're4916VBPbe not4917RBnot coming4918VVGcome definitively4919RBdefinitively down4920RBdown .4921SENT. There4922EXthere are4923VBPbe some4924DTsome side4925NNside questions4926NNSquestion like4927VVPlike ,4928,, is4929VBZbe this4930DTthis exactly4931RBexactly what4932WPwhat the4933DTthe government4934NNgovernment is4935VBZbe doing4936VVGdo ?4937SENT? How4938WRBHow close4939NNclose is4940VBZbe it4941PPit ?4942SENT? These4943DTthese types4944NNStype of4945INof nuances4946NNSnuance ,4947,, I4948PPI think4949VVPthink ,4950,, is4951VBZbe what4952WPwhat Petitioner4953NNpetitioner may4954MDmay be4955VBbe relying4956VVGrely on4957INon .4958SENT. We4959PPwe may4960MDmay have4961VHhave a4962DTa small4963JJsmall disagreement4964NNdisagreement ,4965,, but4966CCbut ,4967,, ultimately4968RBultimately ,4969,, I4970PPI think4971VVPthink what4972WPwhat we4973PPwe agree4974VVPagree on4975INon is4976VBZbe ,4977,, in4978INin light4979NNlight of4980INof the4981DTthe 404982CD@card@ years4983NNSyear of4984INof practice4985NNpractice that4986WDTthat has4987VHZhave occurred4988VVNoccur here4989RBhere ,4990,, all4991RBall we4992PPwe 're4993VBPbe trying4994VVGtry to4995TOto do4996VVdo is4997VBZbe live4998VVlive up4999RPup to5000TOto what5001WPwhat this5002DTthis Court5003NPCourt said5004VVDsay in5005INin another5006DTanother FOIA5007NPFOIA case5008NNcase ,5009,, CIA5010NPCIA versus5011CCversus Sims5012NPSims ,5013,, that5014WDTthat great5015JJgreat nations5016NNSnation ,5017,, like5018INlike great5019JJgreat men5020NNSman ,5021,, should5022MDshould keep5023VVkeep their5024PP$their word5025NNword .5026SENT. And5027CCand the5028DTthe government5029NNgovernment is5030VBZbe trying5031VVGtry to5032TOto keep5033VVkeep its5034PP$its word5035NNword ,5036,, given5037VVNgive over5038INover 405039CD@card@ years5040NNSyear in5041INin the5042DTthe most5043RBSmost official5044JJofficial form5045NNform possible5046JJpossible ,5047,, that5048IN/thatthat we5049PPwe 're5050VBPbe going5051VVGgo to5052TOto keep5053VVkeep this5054DTthis information5055NNinformation confidential5056JJconfidential .5057SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]5058LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] And5059CCand this5060DTthis assurances5061NNSassurance point5062NNpoint of5063INof yours5064PP$yours ,5065,, does5066VVZdo it5067PPit apply5068VVapply only5069RBonly when5070WRBwhen somebody5071NNsomebody is5072VBZbe voluntarily5073RBvoluntarily giving5074VVGgive information5075NNinformation to5076TOto the5077DTthe government5078NNgovernment ,5079,, or5080CCor might5081MDmight it5082PPit apply5083VVapply when5084WRBwhen somebody5085NNsomebody is5086VBZbe mandated5087VVNmandate to5088TOto give5089VVgive information5090NNinformation to5091TOto the5092DTthe government5093NNgovernment ?5094SENT? [MR. YANG]5095LOC[MR. YANG] I5096PPI think5097VVPthink it5098PPit ...5099:... it5100PPit generally5101RBgenerally applies5102VVZapply .5103SENT. Now5104RBnow you5105PPyou 'd5106MDwould have5107VHhave to5108TOto look5109VVlook to5110TOto see5111VVsee whether5112INwhether the5113DTthe government5114NNgovernment would5115MDwould have5116VHhave authority5117NNauthority to5118TOto ...5119:... the5120DTthe agent5121NNagent ...5122:... the5123DTthe government5124NNgovernment official5125NNofficial has5126VHZhave ...5127:... have5128VHPhave authority5129NNauthority to5130TOto make5131VVmake this5132DTthis assurance5133NNassurance in5134INin a5135DTa way5136NNway that5137WDTthat 's5138VBZbe objectively5139RBobjectively understood5140VVNunderstand to5141TOto be5142VBbe speaking5143VVGspeak for5144INfor the5145DTthe agency5146NNagency ,5147,, but5148CCbut it5149PPit can5150MDcan apply5151VVapply potentially5152RBpotentially in5153INin both5154DTboth contexts5155NNScontext .5156SENT. There5157EXthere are5158VBPbe hard5159JJhard hypotheticals5160NNShypotheticals ,5161,, I5162PPI think5163VVPthink ,5164,, at5165INat some5166DTsome edges5167NNSedge .5168SENT. This5169DTthis case5170NNcase does5171VVZdo n't5172RBn't implicate5173VVimplicate any5174DTany of5175INof them5176PPthem ,5177,, so5178RBso I5179PPI think5180VVPthink the5181DTthe Court5182NPCourt could5183MDcould just5184RBjust simply5185RBsimply cut5186VVNcut through5187INthrough the5188DTthe ...5189:... through5190INthrough the5191DTthe ...5192:... the5193DTthe noise5194NNnoise and5195CCand ...5196:... and5197CCand rule5198VVrule quite5199RBquite cleanly5200RBcleanly here5201RBhere .5202SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]5203LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Because5204INbecause ...5205:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5206LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Mr5207NPMr .5208SENT. Yang5209NPYang ,5210,, this5211DTthis is5212VBZbe ...5213:... this5214DTthis is5215VBZbe somewhat5216RBsomewhat confusing5217JJconfusing to5218TOto me5219PPme .5220SENT. Exemption5221NNexemption says5222VVZsay Congress5223NPCongress gets5224VVZget to5225TOto choose5226VVchoose what5227WPwhat should5228MDshould not5229RBnot be5230VBbe disclosed5231VVNdisclose .5232SENT. [MR. YANG]5233LOC[MR. YANG] I5234PPI ...5235:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5236LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] That5237IN/thatthat it5238PPit 's5239VBZbe Congress5240NPCongress 's5241POS's choice5242NNchoice what5243WPwhat the5244DTthe government5245NNgovernment will5246MDwill view5247VVview as5248INas confidential5249JJconfidential and5250CCand not5251RBnot disclose5252VVdisclose .5253SENT. Now5254RBnow you5255PPyou 're5256VBPbe bringing5257VVGbring the5258DTthe government5259NNgovernment ,5260,, the5261DTthe government5262NNgovernment qua5263INqua the5264DTthe executive5265JJexecutive branch5266NNbranch ,5267,, into5268INinto deciding5269VVGdecide what5270WPwhat not5271RBnot to5272TOto disclose5273VVdisclose under5274INunder Exemption5275NPExemption 45276CD4 .5277SENT. Does5278VVZdo n't5279RBn't that5280IN/thatthat turn5281NNturn FOIA5282NPFOIA on5283INon its5284PP$its head5285NNhead ?5286SENT? [MR. YANG]5287LOC[MR. YANG] No5288NPNo ,5289,, I5290PPI think5291VVPthink you5292PPyou ...5293:... if5294INif you5295PPyou read5296VVPread back5297RBback a5298DTa little5299JJlittle bit5300NNbit in5301INin the5302DTthe statute5303NNstatute ,5304,, you5305PPyou 'll5306MDwill see5307VVsee that5308IN/thatthat Congress5309NPCongress says5310VVZsay that5311IN/thatthat FOIA5312NPFOIA does5313VVZdo not5314RBnot apply5315VVapply if5316INif any5317DTany of5318INof the5319DTthe exemptions5320NNSexemption apply5321VVPapply .5322SENT. Exemption5323NNexemption 35324CD3 is5325VBZbe one5326CDone of5327INof them5328PPthem .5329SENT. It5330PPit is5331VBZbe one5332CDone way5333NNway ,5334,, but5335CCbut it5336PPit is5337VBZbe an5338DTan independent5339JJindependent basis5340NNbasis when5341WRBwhen Exemption5342NNexemption 45343CD4 applies5344VVZapply .5345SENT. And5346CCand Exemption5347NPExemption 45348CD4 is5349VBZbe what5350WPwhat we5351PPwe 're5352VBPbe talking5353VVGtalk about5354RBabout here5355RBhere .5356SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5357LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] So5358RBso let5359VVlet 's5360VBZbe go5361VVgo back5362RBback .5363SENT. If5364INif the5365DTthe store5366NNstore does5367VVZdo not5368RBnot keep5369VVkeep it5370PPit confidential5371JJconfidential ,5372,, can5373MDcan you5374PPyou ,5375,, by5376INby a5377DTa promise5378NNpromise of5379INof confidentiality5380NNconfidentiality ,5381,, protect5382VVprotect it5383PPit from5384INfrom FOIA5385NPFOIA disclosure5386NNdisclosure ?5387SENT? [MR. YANG]5388LOC[MR. YANG] I5389PPI think5390VVPthink that5391IN/thatthat would5392MDwould be5393VBbe difficult5394JJdifficult .5395SENT. The5396DTthe first5397JJfirst prong5398NNprong that5399IN/thatthat we5400PPwe are5401VBPbe ...5402:... rely5403VVrely upon5404RPupon is5405VBZbe ...5406:... the5407DTthe first5408JJfirst manifestation5409NNmanifestation ,5410,, if5411INif it5412PPit is5413VBZbe ...5414:... if5415INif I5416PPI could5417MDcould just5418RBjust finish5419VVfinish the5420DTthe ...5421:... the5422DTthe sentence5423NNsentence ,5424,, Mr5425NPMr .5426SENT. Chief5427NPChief Justice5428NPJustice .5429SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5430LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Yeah5431NPYeah .5432SENT. [MR. YANG]5433LOC[MR. YANG] If5434INif information5435NNinformation is5436VBZbe customarily5437RBcustomarily not5438RBnot publicly5439RBpublicly disclosed5440VVNdisclose by5441INby those5442DTthose who5443WPwho submit5444VVPsubmit it5445PPit ,5446,, so5447RBso long5448RBlong as5449INas there5450EXthere is5451VBZbe nothing5452NNnothing in5453INin context5454NNcontext that5455WDTthat suggests5456VVZsuggest that5457IN/thatthat they5458PPthey would5459MDwould understand5460VVunderstand otherwise5461RBotherwise ,5462,, when5463WRBwhen it5464PPit 's5465VBZbe provided5466VVNprovide to5467TOto the5468DTthe government5469NNgovernment ,5470,, it5471PPit would5472MDwould be5473VBbe confidential5474JJconfidential .5475SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5476LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank5477VVthank you5478PPyou ,5479,, Mr5480NPMr .5481SENT. Yang5482NPYang .5483SENT. Mr5484NPMr .5485SENT. Loeb5486NPLoeb .5487SENT.

[MR. LOEB]5488LOC[MR. LOEB] Mr5489NPMr .5490SENT. Chief5491NPChief Justice5492NPJustice ,5493,, and5494CCand may5495MDmay it5496PPit please5497VVplease the5498DTthe Court5499NPCourt :5500:: If5501INif the5502DTthe Court5503NPCourt reaches5504VVZreach the5505DTthe merits5506NNSmerit here5507RBhere ,5508,, it5509PPit should5510MDshould affirm5511VVaffirm the5512DTthe judgment5513NNjudgment of5514INof the5515DTthe Eighth5516JJeighth Circuit5517NNcircuit .5518SENT. For5519INfor 455520CD@card@ years5521NNSyear ,5522,, the5523DTthe language5524NNlanguage of5525INof Exemption5526NPExemption 45527CD4 has5528VHZhave been5529VBNbe properly5530RBproperly construed5531VVNconstrue to5532TOto require5533VVrequire a5534DTa showing5535NNshowing of5536INof likely5537JJlikely competitive5538JJcompetitive harm5539NNharm .5540SENT. Not5541RBnot only5542RBonly is5543VBZbe that5544IN/thatthat competitive5545JJcompetitive harm5546NNharm standard5547NNstandard fully5548RBfully supported5549VVNsupport by5550INby the5551DTthe common5552JJcommon law5553NNlaw that5554WDTthat prevailed5555VVDprevail in5556INin 19665557CD@card@ when5558WRBwhen Exemption5559NPExemption 45560CD4 was5561VBDbe enacted5562VVNenact ,5563,, the5564DTthe standard5565NNstandard has5566VHZhave also5567RBalso been5568VBNbe ratified5569VVNratify by5570INby Congress5571NPCongress for5572INfor reasons5573NNSreason that5574IN/thatthat I5575PPI 'll5576MDwill explain5577VVexplain .5578SENT. In5579INin 19745580CD@card@ ,5581,, the5582DTthe D5583NPD .5584SENT. C5585LSc .5586SENT. Circuit5587NPCircuit adopted5588VVDadopt the5589DTthe National5590NPNational Parks5591NPParks test5592NNtest with5593INwith its5594PP$its two-prong5595NNtwo-prong test5596NNtest ,5597,, including5598VVGinclude the5599DTthe competitive5600JJcompetitive harm5601NNharm requirement5602NNrequirement .5603SENT. But5604CCbut ,5605,, by5606INby 20015607CD@card@ ,5608,, there5609EXthere was5610VBDbe a5611DTa clear5612JJclear judicial5613JJjudicial construction5614NNconstruction .5615SENT. Eight5616CDEight circuits5617NNScircuit had5618VHDhave adopted5619VVNadopt the5620DTthe same5621JJsame two-prong5622NNtwo-prong test5623NNtest as5624INas National5625NPNational Parks5626NPParks .5627SENT. So5628RBso ,5629,, between5630INbetween and5631CCand today5632NNtoday ,5633,, during5634INduring those5635DTthose 185636CD@card@ years5637NNSyear ,5638,, Congress5639NPCongress has5640VHZhave enacted5641VVNenact 295642CD@card@ statutes5643NNSstatute endorsing5644VVGendorse the5645DTthe language5646NNlanguage of5647INof and5648CCand the5649DTthe provision5650NNprovision of5651INof Exemption5652NPExemption 45653CD4 and5654CCand has5655VHZhave ...5656:... and5657CCand has5658VHZhave effectively5659RBeffectively amended5660VVNamend Exemption5661NPExemption 45662CD4 ,5663,, thereby5664RBthereby ratifying5665VVGratify the5666DTthe National5667NPNational Parks5668NPParks standard5669NNstandard .5670SENT. Now5671RBnow ...5672:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]5673LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Mr5674NPMr .5675SENT. Loeb5676NPLoeb ,5677,, this5678DTthis case5679NNcase strikes5680VVZstrike me5681PPme as5682INas a5683DTa lot5684NNlot like5685INlike Milner5686NPMilner ,5687,, that5688WDTthat you5689PPyou have5690VHPhave a5691DTa D5692NPD .5693SENT. C5694LSc .5695SENT. Circuit5696NNcircuit opinion5697NNopinion which5698WDTwhich puts5699VVZput some5700DTsome things5701NNSthing into5702INinto the5703DTthe test5704NNtest that5705IN/thatthat maybe5706RBmaybe the5707DTthe ...5708:... the5709DTthe statutory5710JJstatutory text5711NNtext does5712VVZdo not5713RBnot immediately5714RBimmediately suggest5715VVsuggest .5716SENT. And5717CCand then5718RBthen there5719EXthere is5720VBZbe ...5721:... everybody5722NNeverybody adopts5723VVZadopt it5724PPit ,5725,, you5726PPyou know5727VVPknow ?5728SENT? In5729INin Milner5730NPMilner too5731RBtoo ,5732,, all5733PDTall the5734DTthe courts5735NNScourt of5736INof appeals5737NNSappeal had5738VHDhave adopted5739VVNadopt it5740PPit .5741SENT. Congress5742NPCongress had5743VHDhave let5744VVNlet it5745PPit remain5746VVPremain on5747INon the5748DTthe books5749NNSbook for5750INfor quite5751PDTquite some5752DTsome time5753NNtime without5754INwithout doing5755VVGdo anything5756NNanything about5757INabout it5758PPit .5759SENT. Why5760WRBwhy is5761VBZbe n't5762RBn't this5763DTthis the5764DTthe same5765JJsame thing5766NNthing as5767INas that5768DTthat ,5769,, where5770WRBwhere we5771PPwe did5772VVDdo say5773VVsay no5774UHno ,5775,, we5776PPwe 're5777VBPbe going5778VVGgo to5779TOto go5780VVgo with5781INwith the5782DTthe text5783NNtext ,5784,, not5785RBnot with5786INwith this5787DTthis extrapolation5788NNextrapolation ?5789SENT? [MR. LOEB]5790LOC[MR. LOEB] Context5791NNcontext here5792RBhere is5793VBZbe very5794RBvery different5795JJdifferent than5796INthan Milner5797NPMilner .5798SENT. This5799DTthis Court5800NPCourt in5801INin Milner5802NPMilner expressly5803RBexpressly said5804VVDsay there5805EXthere was5806VBDbe n't5807RBn't a5808DTa judicial5809JJjudicial consensus5810NNconsensus supporting5811VVGsupport the5812DTthe D5813NPD .5814SENT. C5815LSc .5816SENT. Circu5817NPCircu it5818PPit 's5819VBZbe ruling5820VVGrule .5821SENT. Also5822RBalso there5823RBthere ,5824,, there5825EXthere were5826VBDbe n't5827RBn't multiple5828JJmultiple statutes5829NNSstatute that5830RBthat ...5831:... here5832RBhere ,5833,, we5834PPwe have5835VHPhave 295836CD@card@ statutes5837NNSstatute ,5838,, after5839INafter the5840DTthe judicial5841JJjudicial consensus5842NNconsensus ,5843,, enacted5844VVNenact which5845WDTwhich effectively5846RBeffectively amend5847VVPamend Exemption5848NPExemption 45849CD4 ...5850:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5851LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] As5852INas to5853TOto the5854DTthe ...5855:... [MR. LOEB]5856LOC[MR. LOEB] ...5857:... and5858CCand that5859WDTthat certainly5860RBcertainly was5861VBDbe not5862RBnot the5863DTthe case5864NNcase ...5865:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]5866LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] ...5867:... as5868RBas to5869TOto the5870DTthe consensus5871NNconsensus ,5872,, if5873INif I5874PPI can5875MDcan stop5876VVstop you5877PPyou on5878INon that5879DTthat point5880NNpoint ,5881,, we5882PPwe 're5883VBPbe told5884VVNtell by5885INby the5886DTthe other5887JJother side5888NNside that5889IN/thatthat the5890DTthe circuits5891NNScircuit have5892VHPhave been5893VBNbe markedly5894RBmarkedly inconsistent5895JJinconsistent in5896INin the5897DTthe way5898NNway they5899PPthey apply5900VVPapply the5901DTthe test5902NNtest .5903SENT. So5904RBso ,5905,, if5906INif ...5907:... if5908INif ...5909:... if5910INif the5911DTthe D5912NPD .5913SENT. C5914LSc .5915SENT. Circuit5916NPCircuit had5917VHDhave ruled5918VVNrule one5919CDone way5920NNway and5921CCand everybody5922NNeverybody said5923VVDsay ,5924,, yeah5925RByeah ,5926,, this5927DTthis is5928VBZbe how5929WRBhow we5930PPwe do5931VVPdo it5932PPit ,5933,, and5934CCand the5935DTthe decisions5936NNSdecision all5937RBall lined5938VVDline up5939RPup ,5940,, that5941WDTthat would5942MDwould be5943VBbe one5944CDone thing5945NNthing .5946SENT. But5947CCbut ,5948,, here5949RBhere ,5950,, we5951PPwe 're5952VBPbe told5953VVNtell that5954IN/thatthat they5955PPthey will5956MDwill verbalize5957VVverbalize the5958DTthe same5959JJsame formulation5960NNformulation ,5961,, but5962CCbut they5963PPthey apply5964VVPapply it5965PPit differently5966RBdifferently .5967SENT. [MR. LOEB]5968LOC[MR. LOEB] Well5969UHwell ,5970,, I5971PPI think5972VVPthink the5973DTthe ...5974:... the5975DTthe key5976JJkey factor5977NNfactor is5978VBZbe they5979PPthey all5980DTall adopt5981VVadopt the5982DTthe same5983JJsame two-prong5984NNtwo-prong standard5985NNstandard of5986INof National5987NPNational Parks5988NPParks .5989SENT. And5990CCand in5991INin any5992DTany standard5993NNstandard ,5994,, how5995WRBhow it5996PPit 's5997VBZbe applied5998VVNapply ,5999,, even6000RBeven terms6001NNSterm like6002INlike fraud6003NNfraud ,6004,, which6005WDTwhich are6006VBPbe well6007RBwell developed6008VVNdevelop in6009INin the6010DTthe law6011NNlaw ,6012,, as6013INas it6014PPit 's6015VBZbe applied6016VVNapply to6017TOto a6018DTa particular6019JJparticular circumstance6020NNcircumstance ,6021,, there6022EXthere 's6023VBZbe always6024RBalways going6025VVGgo to6026TOto be6027VBbe some6028DTsome deviation6029NNdeviation of6030INof the6031DTthe courts6032NNScourt .6033SENT. But6034CCbut ,6035,, ultimately6036RBultimately ,6037,, all6038PDTall the6039DTthe circuits6040NNScircuit who6041WPwho have6042VHPhave addressed6043VVNaddress this6044DTthis issue6045NNissue have6046VHPhave adopted6047VVNadopt the6048DTthe National6049NPNational Parks6050NPParks standard6051NNstandard and6052CCand ,6053,, as6054RBas to6055TOto the6056DTthe competitive6057JJcompetitive harm6058NNharm requirement6059NNrequirement ,6060,, all6061RBall require6062VVrequire a6063DTa showing6064NNshowing of6065INof likely6066JJlikely competitive6067JJcompetitive harm6068NNharm .6069SENT. And6070CCand that6071DTthat is6072VBZbe the6073DTthe standard6074NNstandard we6075PPwe 're6076VBPbe saying6077VVGsay that6078WDTthat is6079VBZbe ...6080:... has6081VHZhave been6082VBNbe ratified6083VVNratify here6084RBhere .6085SENT. If6086INif you6087PPyou look6088VVPlook at6089INat some6090DTsome of6091INof the6092DTthe statutes6093NNSstatute that6094WDTthat we6095PPwe attach6096VVPattach in6097INin our6098PP$our addendum6099NNaddendum ,6100,, they6101PPthey are6102VBPbe actually6103RBactually limiting6104VVGlimit the6105DTthe discretion6106NNdiscretion that6107WDTthat 's6108VBZbe under6109INunder Exemption6110NPExemption 46111CD4 .6112SENT. So6113RBso ,6114,, as6115INas the6116DTthe SG6117NPSG 's6118POS's brief6119JJbrief points6120NNSpoint out6121RBout ,6122,, Exemption6123NPExemption 46124CD4 does6125VVZdo n't6126RBn't prohibit6127VVprohibit disclosure6128NNdisclosure ,6129,, it6130PPit just6131RBjust says6132VVZsay the6133DTthe agency6134NNagency has6135VHZhave discretion6136NNdiscretion whether6137INwhether to6138TOto disclose6139VVdisclose or6140CCor not6141RBnot .6142SENT. These6143DTthese additional6144JJadditional statutes6145NNSstatute micromanage6146NNmicromanage that6147DTthat discretion6148NNdiscretion .6149SENT. Some6150DTsome of6151INof them6152PPthem say6153VVPsay that6154IN/thatthat when6155WRBwhen you6156PPyou have6157VHPhave the6158DTthe discretion6159NNdiscretion ,6160,, you6161PPyou have6162VHPhave to6163TOto withhold6164VVwithhold .6165SENT. Some6166DTsome say6167VVPsay that6168IN/thatthat when6169WRBwhen you6170PPyou have6171VHPhave the6172DTthe discretion6173NNdiscretion ,6174,, you6175PPyou have6176VHPhave to6177TOto withhold6178VVwithhold for6179INfor five6180CDfive years6181NNSyear .6182SENT. Some6183DTsome say6184VVPsay when6185WRBwhen you6186PPyou have6187VHPhave discretion6188NNdiscretion ,6189,, you6190PPyou have6191VHPhave to6192TOto ask6193VVask the6194DTthe private6195JJprivate party6196NNparty their6197PP$their view6198NNview .6199SENT. Those6200DTthose are6201VBPbe all6202RBall ...6203:... those6204DTthose all6205RBall could6206MDcould have6207VHhave been6208VBNbe codified6209VVNcodify under6210INunder Exemption6211NPExemption 46212CD4 ,6213,, but6214CCbut ,6215,, instead6216RBinstead ,6217,, they6218PPthey were6219VBDbe codified6220VVNcodify under6221INunder separate6222JJseparate statutes6223NNSstatute .6224SENT. But6225CCbut that6226DTthat 's6227VBZbe just6228RBjust a6229DTa matter6230NNmatter of6231INof formalism6232NNformalism .6233SENT. This6234DTthis Court6235NPCourt has6236VHZhave said6237VVNsay when6238WRBwhen ...6239:... when6240WRBwhen Congress6241NPCongress actually6242RBactually examines6243VVZexamine a6244DTa statute6245NNstatute ,6246,, amends6247VVZamend a6248DTa statute6249NNstatute ,6250,, and6251CCand ...6252:... and6253CCand reenacts6254VVZreenact it6255PPit ,6256,, that6257IN/thatthat your6258PP$your ...6259:... that6260DTthat ...6261:... that6262IN/thatthat Congress6263NPCongress is6264VBZbe presumed6265VVNpresume to6266TOto have6267VHhave adopted6268VVNadopt the6269DTthe prevailing6270JJprevailing judicial6271JJjudicial construction6272NNconstruction .6273SENT. That6274DTthat 's6275VBZbe what6276WPwhat this6277DTthis Court6278NPCourt said6279VVDsay in6280INin Lorillard6281NPLorillard ,6282,, in6283INin Shapiro6284NPShapiro ,6285,, and6286CCand this6287DTthis term6288NNterm in6289INin Helsinn6290NPHelsinn .6291SENT. And6292CCand ,6293,, likewise6294RBlikewise ,6295,, here6296RBhere ,6297,, we6298PPwe have6299VHPhave all6300PDTall the6301DTthe circuits6302NNScircuit lined6303VVDline up6304RPup on6305INon the6306DTthe two-prong6307NNtwo-prong standards6308NNSstandard .6309SENT. We6310PPwe have6311VHPhave Congress6312NPCongress not6313RBnot just6314RBjust addressing6315VVGaddress the6316DTthe statute6317NNstatute once6318RBonce but6319CCbut 296320CD@card@ times6321NNStime in6322INin this6323DTthis 18-year6324JJ18-year period6325NNperiod where6326WRBwhere they6327PPthey ,6328,, again6329RBagain ,6330,, have6331VHPhave codified6332VVNcodify over6333RPover and6334CCand over6335RPover again6336RBagain that6337RBthat ...6338:... that6339DTthat ...6340:... that6341DTthat standard6342NNstandard .6343SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6344LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Mr6345NPMr .6346SENT. Loeb6347NPLoeb ,6348,, along6349INalong those6350DTthose lines6351NNSline ,6352,, the6353DTthe other6354JJother side6355NNside makes6356VVZmake the6357DTthe argument6358NNargument that6359IN/thatthat ,6360,, in6361INin Exemption6362NPExemption 76363CD7 ,6364,, the6365DTthe word6366NNword "6367``" confidential6368JJconfidential "6369''" is6370VBZbe given6371VVNgive a6372DTa different6373JJdifferent gloss6374NNgloss than6375INthan you6376PPyou would6377MDwould have6378VHhave us6379PPus give6380VVgive it6381PPit in6382RPin ...6383:... in6384INin Exemption6385NPExemption 46386CD4 .6387SENT. I6388PPI 'm6389VBPbe sure6390JJsure you6391PPyou would6392MDwould like6393VVlike an6394DTan opportunity6395NNopportunity to6396TOto respond6397VVrespond to6398TOto that6399DTthat .6400SENT. [MR. LOEB]6401LOC[MR. LOEB] Correct6402JJcorrect ,6403,, Your6404PP$your Honor6405NPHonor .6406SENT. So6407RBso ,6408,, in6409INin looking6410VVGlook at6411INat Exemption6412NPExemption 46413CD4 ,6414,, you6415PPyou have6416VHPhave to6417TOto look6418VVlook at6419INat those6420DTthose words6421NNSword in6422INin ...6423:... in6424INin a6425DTa ...6426:... a6427DTa textual6428JJtextual construction6429NNconstruction of6430INof it6431PPit .6432SENT. We6433PPwe 'll6434MDwill begin6435VVbegin by6436INby looking6437VVGlook at6438INat the6439DTthe words6440NNSword and6441CCand looking6442VVGlook at6443INat how6444WRBhow they6445PPthey were6446VBDbe used6447VVNuse in6448INin context6449NNcontext at6450INat the6451DTthe time6452NNtime .6453SENT. And6454CCand we6455PPwe know6456VVPknow for6457INfor Exemption6458NPExemption 46459CD4 ,6460,, Congress6461NPCongress started6462VVDstart with6463INwith a6464DTa common6465JJcommon law6466NNlaw term6467NNterm ,6468,, trade6469NNtrade secrets6470NNSsecret ,6471,, which6472WDTwhich even6473RBeven FMI6474NPFMI agrees6475VVZagree ...6476:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6477LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] That6478DTthat 's6479VBZbe another6480DTanother point6481NNpoint .6482SENT. I6483PPI 'd6484MDwould like6485VVlike to6486TOto get6487VVget to6488TOto that6489DTthat too6490RBtoo .6491SENT. But6492CCbut ,6493,, when6494WRBwhen we6495PPwe 're6496VBPbe dealing6497VVGdeal with6498INwith the6499DTthe word6500NNword "6501``" confidential6502JJconfidential "6503''" ,6504,, Justice6505NPJustice Kagan6506NPKagan made6507VVDmake the6508DTthe point6509NNpoint that6510IN/thatthat perhaps6511RBperhaps there6512EXthere 's6513VBZbe a6514DTa gloss6515NNgloss that6516WDTthat 's6517VHZhave been6518VBNbe placed6519VVNplace on6520INon it6521PPit that6522WDTthat might6523MDmight be6524VBbe inconsistent6525JJinconsistent with6526INwith what6527WPwhat might6528MDmight appear6529VVappear to6530TOto be6531VBbe its6532PP$its ordinary6533JJordinary meaning6534NNmeaning .6535SENT. And6536CCand that6537DTthat argument6538NNargument seems6539VVZseem to6540TOto me6541PPme to6542TOto have6543VHhave some6544DTsome strength6545NNstrength ,6546,, given6547VVNgive the6548DTthe fact6549NNfact that6550IN/thatthat Exemption6551NPExemption 76552CD7 has6553VHZhave n't6554RBn't been6555VBNbe treated6556VVNtreat by6557INby lower6558JJRlow courts6559NNScourt that6560WDTthat bear6561VVPbear the6562DTthe same6563JJsame gloss6564NNgloss that6565IN/thatthat you6566PPyou would6567MDwould have6568VHhave us6569PPus put6570VVNput on6571INon Section6572NNsection ...6573:... on6574INon Exemption6575NPExemption 46576CD4 .6577SENT. And6578CCand I6579PPI 'm6580VBPbe just6581RBjust wondering6582VVGwonder ,6583,, how6584WRBhow do6585VVPdo you6586PPyou deal6587VVdeal with6588INwith that6589DTthat incongruity6590NNincongruity textually6591RBtextually ?6592SENT? [MR. LOEB]6593LOC[MR. LOEB] Right6594RBright .6595SENT. Well6596UHwell ,6597,, first6598RBfirst ,6599,, let6600VVPlet me6601PPme admit6602VVPadmit we6603PPwe 're6604VBPbe not6605RBnot ...6606:... we6607PPwe ...6608:... we6609PPwe agree6610VVPagree that6611IN/thatthat the6612DTthe reading6613NNreading of6614INof the6615DTthe ...6616:... the6617DTthe word6618NNword in6619INin Exemption6620NPExemption 76621CD7 and6622CCand Exemption6623NPExemption 46624CD4 do6625VVPdo n't6626RBn't have6627VHhave the6628DTthe same6629JJsame import6630NNimport .6631SENT. Let6632VVlet me6633PPme explain6634VVexplain why6635WRBwhy .6636SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6637LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] So6638RBso why6639WRBwhy should6640MDshould we6641PPwe give6642VVgive the6643DTthe same6644JJsame word6645NNword two6646CDtwo different6647JJdifferent meanings6648NNSmeaning when6649WRBwhen they6650PPthey 're6651VBPbe virtual6652JJvirtual neighbors6653NNSneighbor ?6654SENT? [MR. LOEB]6655LOC[MR. LOEB] First6656NPFirst ,6657,, the6658DTthe commonality6659NNcommonality ,6660,, that6661WDTthat even6662RBeven under6663INunder Exemption6664NPExemption 76665CD7 ,6666,, this6667DTthis Court6668NPCourt did6669VVDdo n't6670RBn't turn6671VVturn to6672TOto ask6673VVask the6674DTthe confidential6675JJconfidential source6676NNsource ,6677,, do6678VVPdo you6679PPyou think6680VVPthink that6681IN/thatthat you6682PPyou had6683VHDhave a6684DTa confidential6685JJconfidential relationship6686NNrelationship ?6687SENT? Instead6688RBinstead ,6689,, they6690PPthey looked6691VVDlook for6692INfor objective6693JJobjective factors6694NNSfactor .6695SENT. And6696CCand our6697PP$our ...6698:... our6699PP$our standard6700NNstandard here6701RBhere is6702VBZbe looking6703VVGlook at6704INat an6705DTan objective6706JJobjective one6707CDone ,6708,, objective6709JJobjective harm6710NNharm .6711SENT. Second6712RBsecond ,6713,, the6714DTthe fact6715NNfact that6716IN/thatthat the6717DTthe same6718JJsame word6719NNword is6720VBZbe used6721VVNuse in6722INin different6723JJdifferent provisions6724NNSprovision of6725INof the6726DTthe exemption6727NNexemption does6728VVZdo n't6729RBn't answer6730VVanswer it6731PPit .6732SENT. For6733INfor example6734NNexample ,6735,, trade6736NNtrade secrets6737NNSsecret has6738VHZhave the6739DTthe word6740NNword "6741``" secret6742JJsecret "6743''" .6744SENT. But6745CCbut ,6746,, if6747INif you6748PPyou look6749VVPlook at6750INat Exemption6751NPExemption 16752CD1 ,6753,, it6754PPit uses6755VVZuse the6756DTthe word6757NNword "6758``" secret6759JJsecret "6760''" regarding6761VVGregard national6762JJnational security6763NNsecurity matters6764NNSmatter .6765SENT. You6766PPyou would6767MDwould n't6768RBn't say6769VVsay the6770DTthe word6771NNword "6772``" secret6773JJsecret "6774''" regarding6775VVGregard national6776JJnational security6777NNsecurity secrets6778NNSsecret has6779VHZhave to6780TOto be6781VBbe read6782VVNread the6783DTthe same6784JJsame as6785INas trade6786NNtrade secrets6787NNSsecret because6788INbecause trade6789NNtrade secrets6790NNSsecret has6791VHZhave a6792DTa common6793JJcommon law6794NNlaw meaning6795NNmeaning .6796SENT. And6797CCand that6798DTthat common6799JJcommon law6800NNlaw meaning6801NNmeaning ...6802:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]6803LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] I6804PPI agree6805VVPagree ,6806,, secrets6807NNSsecret in6808INin the6809DTthe national6810JJnational security6811NNsecurity context6812NNcontext might6813MDmight be6814VBbe different6815JJdifferent than6816INthan they6817PPthey are6818VBPbe in6819INin the6820DTthe trade6821NNtrade secret6822JJsecret context6823NNcontext ,6824,, but6825CCbut that6826WDTthat 's6827VBZbe ...6828:... that6829WDTthat 's6830VBZbe just6831RBjust not6832RBnot helping6833VVGhelp me6834PPme with6835INwith the6836DTthe word6837NNword "6838``" confidential6839JJconfidential "6840''" .6841SENT. So6842RBso perhaps6843RBperhaps there6844EXthere 's6845VBZbe something6846NNsomething particular6847JJparticular about6848INabout it6849PPit ,6850,, maybe6851RBmaybe there6852EXthere is6853VBZbe n't6854RBn't .6855SENT. I6856PPI 'll6857MDwill let6858VVlet you6859PPyou go6860VVgo on6861RPon .6862SENT. [MR. LOEB]6863LOC[MR. LOEB] No6864UHNo ,6865,, no6866UHno .6867SENT. There6868EXthere 's6869VBZbe something6870NNsomething particular6871JJparticular about6872INabout Exemption6873NPExemption 76874CD7 .6875SENT. It6876PPit talks6877VVZtalk about6878INabout information6879NNinformation that6880WDTthat 's6881VBZbe ...6882:... information6883NNinformation that6884WDTthat is6885VBZbe furnished6886VVNfurnish under6887INunder a6888DTa basis6889NNbasis of6890INof ...6891:... a6892DTa confidential6893JJconfidential basis6894NNbasis .6895SENT. So6896RBso there6897RBthere ,6898,, where6899WRBwhere Congress6900NPCongress wanted6901VVDwant to6902TOto say6903VVsay it6904PPit was6905VBDbe furnished6906VVNfurnish on6907INon a6908DTa confidential6909JJconfidential basis6910NNbasis ,6911,, it6912PPit knew6913VVDknow how6914WRBhow to6915TOto say6916VVsay that6917DTthat .6918SENT. That6919DTthat 's6920VBZbe not6921RBnot what6922WPwhat it6923PPit says6924VVZsay under6925INunder Exemption6926NPExemption 46927CD4 .6928SENT. Instead6929RBinstead ,6930,, we6931PPwe have6932VHPhave Congress6933NPCongress adopting6934VVGadopt these6935DTthese common6936JJcommon law6937NNlaw terms6938NNSterm ,6939,, trade6940NNtrade secrets6941NNSsecret and6942CCand related6943JJrelated confidential6944JJconfidential commercial6945JJcommercial information6946NNinformation ,6947,, and6948CCand when6949WRBwhen looking6950VVGlook at6951INat those6952DTthose ...6953:... those6954DTthose words6955NNSword anew6956RBanew ,6957,, you6958PPyou would6959MDwould ...6960:... you6961PPyou would6962MDwould look6963VVlook at6964INat how6965WRBhow they6966PPthey were6967VBDbe used6968VVNuse in6969INin 19666970CD@card@ under6971INunder the6972DTthe common6973JJcommon law6974NNlaw .6975SENT. And6976CCand we6977PPwe know6978VVPknow trade6979NNtrade secrets6980NNSsecret required6981VVNrequire under6982INunder the6983DTthe common6984JJcommon law6985NNlaw a6986DTa showing6987NNshowing of6988INof competitive6989JJcompetitive harm6990NNharm .6991SENT. And6992CCand for6993INfor the6994DTthe restatement6995NNrestatement ,6996,, we6997PPwe know6998VVPknow that6999IN/thatthat this7000DTthis other7001JJother second7002JJsecond box7003NNbox of7004INof ...7005:... of7006INof confidential7007JJconfidential business7008NNbusiness information7009NNinformation also7010RBalso required7011VVDrequire a7012DTa showing7013NNshowing of7014INof competitive7015JJcompetitive harm7016NNharm .7017SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]7018LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] So7019RBso ...7020:... so7021RBso what7022WPwhat do7023VVPdo you7024PPyou ...7025:... do7026VVPdo you7027PPyou think7028VVPthink ?7029SENT? That7030DTthat is7031VBZbe ,7032,, what7033WPwhat do7034VVPdo you7035PPyou think7036VVPthink about7037RBabout that7038RBthat ?7039SENT? I7040PPI mean7041VVPmean ,7042,, in7043INin reading7044VVGread some7045DTsome of7046INof these7047DTthese cases7048NNScase ,7049,, it7050PPit was7051VBDbe n't7052RBn't National7053NPNational Parks7054NPParks so7055RBso much7056RBmuch that7057IN/thatthat I7058PPI think7059VVPthink caused7060VVNcause the7061DTthe problem7062NNproblem but7063CCbut other7064JJother cases7065NNScase that7066DTthat sort7067NNsort of7068INof run7069NNrun with7070INwith it7071PPit .7072SENT. That7073DTthat is7074VBZbe ,7075,, some7076DTsome say7077VVPsay ,7078,, well7079RBwell ,7080,, the7081DTthe competitors7082NNScompetitor have7083VHPhave to7084TOto use7085VVuse this7086DTthis in7087INin an7088DTan affirmative7089JJaffirmative way7090NNway .7091SENT. I7092PPI do7093VVPdo n't7094RBn't know7095VVknow where7096WRBwhere they7097PPthey got7098VVDget that7099IN/thatthat out7100INout of7101INof the7102DTthe statute7103NNstatute .7104SENT. So7105RBso would7106MDwould you7107PPyou be7108VBbe satisfied7109VVNsatisfy if7110INif we7111PPwe were7112VBDbe to7113TOto simply7114RBsimply say7115VVsay :7116:: Well7117UHWell ,7118,, they7119PPthey had7120VHDhave the7121DTthe right7122JJright idea7123NNidea there7124RBthere .7125SENT. Confidential7126JJconfidential information7127NNinformation is7128VBZbe information7129NNinformation that7130WDTthat is7131VBZbe legitimate7132JJlegitimate for7133INfor a7134DTa confidential7135JJconfidential ...7136:... for7137INfor a7138DTa legitimate7139JJlegitimate reason7140NNreason .7141SENT. It7142PPit 's7143VBZbe confidential7144JJconfidential for7145INfor a7146DTa legitimate7147JJlegitimate reason7148NNreason .7149SENT. Release7150NNrelease would7151MDwould hurt7152VVhurt the7153DTthe company7154NNcompany or7155CCor release7156NNrelease would7157MDwould hurt7158VVhurt the7159DTthe government7160NNgovernment .7161SENT. And7162CCand then7163RBthen we7164PPwe add7165VVPadd :7166:: And7167CCand ,7168,, of7169INof course7170NNcourse ,7171,, there7172EXthere has7173VHZhave to7174TOto be7175VBbe harm7176NNharm ,7177,, I7178PPI mean7179VVPmean ,7180,, business-related7181JJbusiness-related harm7182NNharm to7183TOto the7184DTthe company7185NNcompany .7186SENT. Now7187RBnow that7188IN/thatthat would7189MDwould stop7190VVstop ...7191:... you7192PPyou know7193VVPknow ,7194,, I7195PPI can7196MDcan imagine7197VVimagine easily7198RBeasily cases7199NNScase where7200WRBwhere there7201EXthere 's7202VBZbe information7203NNinformation about7204INabout who7205WPwho you7206PPyou sell7207VVsell to7208TOto and7209CCand who7210WPwho you7211PPyou do7212VVPdo n't7213RBn't sell7214VVsell to7215TOto ,7216,, and7217CCand ,7218,, of7219INof course7220NNcourse ,7221,, you7222PPyou want7223VVPwant to7224TOto keep7225VVkeep that7226IN/thatthat quiet7227JJquiet because7228INbecause you7229PPyou give7230VVPgive the7231DTthe impression7232NNimpression that7233IN/thatthat every7234DTevery sane7235JJsane person7236NNperson in7237INin the7238DTthe world7239NNworld buys7240VVZbuy your7241PP$your product7242NNproduct .7243SENT. And7244CCand this7245DTthis would7246MDwould show7247VVshow that7248DTthat 's7249VBZbe not7250RBnot true7251JJtrue .7252SENT. But7253CCbut we7254PPwe do7255VVPdo n't7256RBn't know7257VVknow whether7258INwhether people7259NNSpeople will7260MDwill take7261VVtake advantage7262NNadvantage of7263INof that7264WDTthat or7265CCor not7266RBnot ,7267,, but7268CCbut they7269PPthey might7270MDmight .7271SENT. So7272RBso it7273PPit 's7274VBZbe harm7275NNharm ,7276,, and7277CCand it7278PPit 's7279VBZbe legitimate7280JJlegitimate .7281SENT. Is7282VBZbe that7283IN/thatthat good7284JJgood enough7285NNenough in7286INin your7287PP$your opinion7288NNopinion ?7289SENT? [MR. LOEB]7290LOC[MR. LOEB] Yes7291NPYes ,7292,, Your7293PP$your Honor7294NPHonor .7295SENT. So7296RBso ...7297:... [JUSTICE BREYER]7298LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yes7299NPYes ?7300SENT? [MR. LOEB]7301LOC[MR. LOEB] ...7302:... the7303DTthe National7304NPNational Parks7305NPParks test7306NNtest requires7307VVZrequire a7308DTa likely7309JJlikely showing7310NNshowing of7311INof competitive7312JJcompetitive harm7313NNharm .7314SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]7315LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And7316CCand ...7317:... and7318CCand it7319PPit 's7320VBZbe other7321JJother cases7322NNScase that7323WDTthat have7324VHPhave gone7325VVNgo beyond7326INbeyond that7327DTthat .7328SENT. [MR. LOEB]7329LOC[MR. LOEB] To7330NPTo ...7331:... [JUSTICE BREYER]7332LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Likely7333JJlikely showing7334NNshowing of7335INof competitive7336JJcompetitive harm7337NNharm .7338SENT. Maybe7339RBmaybe it7340PPit 's7341VBZbe harm7342NNharm to7343TOto business7344NNbusiness .7345SENT. Maybe7346RBmaybe when7347WRBwhen people7348NNSpeople find7349VVPfind out7350RPout about7351INabout this7352DTthis ,7353,, they7354PPthey just7355RBjust will7356MDwill stop7357VVstop buying7358VVGbuy it7359PPit ,7360,, though7361INthough no7362DTno new7363JJnew person7364NNperson will7365MDwill enter7366VVenter the7367DTthe market7368NNmarket .7369SENT. You7370PPyou see7371VVPsee ,7372,, I7373PPI mean7374VVPmean ,7375,, I7376PPI ...7377:... I7378PPI do7379VVPdo n't7380RBn't see7381VVsee the7382DTthe harm7383NNharm being7384VBGbe any7385DTany different7386JJdifferent there7387RBthere .7388SENT. And7389CCand I7390PPI ask7391VVPask the7392DTthe question7393NNquestion ,7394,, say7395VVPsay ,7396,, is7397VBZbe it7398PPit necessary7399JJnecessary to7400TOto use7401VVuse ,7402,, with7403INwith the7404DTthe word7405NNword "7406``" harm7407NNharm "7408''" ,7409,, that7410DTthat word7411NNword "7412``" competitive7413JJcompetitive "7414''" ,7415,, rather7416RBrather than7417INthan a7418DTa more7419RBRmore general7420JJgeneral word7421NNword ,7422,, like7423INlike "7424``" business7425NNbusiness "7426''" ?7427SENT? [MR. LOEB]7428LOC[MR. LOEB] I7429PPI ...7430:... [JUSTICE BREYER]7431LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Business-related7432JJbusiness-related .7433SENT. [MR. LOEB]7434LOC[MR. LOEB] Well7435UHWell ,7436,, trade7437NNtrade secrets7438NNSsecret ,7439,, which7440WDTwhich is7441VBZbe the7442DTthe brother7443NNbrother of7444INof this7445DTthis category7446NNcategory of7447INof information7448NNinformation ...7449:... [JUSTICE BREYER]7450LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But7451CCbut ,7452,, I7453PPI 'm7454VBPbe curious7455JJcurious ,7456,, if7457INif you7458PPyou can7459MDcan give7460VVgive me7461PPme a7462DTa yes-or-no7463NNyes-or-no answer7464NNanswer ,7465,, it7466PPit would7467MDwould really7468RBreally help7469VVhelp .7470SENT. You7471PPyou do7472VVPdo n't7473RBn't have7474VHhave to7475TOto ,7476,, but7477CCbut it7478PPit would7479MDwould help7480VVhelp me7481PPme .7482SENT. [MR. LOEB]7483LOC[MR. LOEB] Our7484PP$our threshold7485NNthreshold answer7486NNanswer is7487VBZbe that7488IN/thatthat it7489PPit ...7490:... it7491PPit requires7492VVZrequire a7493DTa competitive7494JJcompetitive harm7495NNharm .7496SENT. But7497CCbut even7498RBeven National7499NPNational Parks7500NPParks and7501CCand the7502DTthe circuits7503NNScircuit adopting7504VVGadopt it7505PPit have7506VHPhave n't7507RBn't ...7508:... did7509VVDdo n't7510RBn't say7511VVsay that7512WDTthat was7513VBDbe hermetically7514RBhermetically sealed7515VVNseal ,7516,, and7517CCand there7518EXthere could7519MDcould be7520VBbe other7521JJother related7522VVNrelate business7523NNbusiness harms7524VVZharm that7525IN/thatthat you7526PPyou could7527MDcould show7528VVshow were7529VBDbe to7530TOto the7531DTthe same7532JJsame level7533NNlevel and7534CCand that7535WDTthat should7536MDshould still7537RBstill trigger7538VVtrigger ...7539:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7540LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I7541PPI 'm7542VBPbe sorry7543JJsorry ,7544,, do7545VVPdo you7546PPyou accept7547VVaccept the7548DTthe reasonable7549JJreasonable possibility7550NNpossibility of7551INof harm7552NNharm test7553NNtest ?7554SENT? [MR. LOEB]7555LOC[MR. LOEB] No7556NPNo .7557SENT. No7558UHNo ,7559,, Your7560PP$your Honor7561NPHonor .7562SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7563LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Because7564INbecause Justice7565NPJustice Breyer7566NPBreyer ,7567,, in7568INin his7569PP$his description7570NNdescription ,7571,, said7572VVDsay sometimes7573RBsometimes you7574PPyou just7575RBjust can7576MDcan 't7577RB't prove7578VVprove it7579PPit ,7580,, but7581CCbut you7582PPyou ...7583:... there7584EXthere 's7585VBZbe a7586DTa reasonable7587JJreasonable possibility7588NNpossibility of7589INof it7590PPit .7591SENT. That7592DTthat has7593VHZhave been7594VBNbe thrown7595VVNthrow out7596RPout as7597INas a7598DTa ...7599:... as7600INas a7601DTa ...7602:... why7603WRBwhy is7604VBZbe that7605IN/thatthat not7606RBnot enough7607RBenough ?7608SENT? [MR. LOEB]7609LOC[MR. LOEB] Well7610UHWell ,7611,, under7612INunder the7613DTthe common7614JJcommon law7615NNlaw and7616CCand under7617INunder the7618DTthe restatement7619NNrestatement ,7620,, there7621EXthere was7622VBDbe always7623RBalways a7624DTa requirement7625NNrequirement of7626INof showing7627VVGshow a7628DTa likely7629JJlikely competitive7630JJcompetitive harm7631NNharm or7632CCor a7633DTa likely7634JJlikely harm7635NNharm of7636INof sorts7637NNSsort .7638SENT. So7639INso having7640VHGhave just7641RBjust a7642DTa reasonable7643JJreasonable possibility7644NNpossibility seems7645VVZseem to7646TOto be7647VBbe sort7648NNsort of7649INof more7650JJRmore of7651INof a7652DTa scintilla7653NNscintilla argument7654NNargument which7655WDTwhich ...7656:... which7657WDTwhich would7658MDwould allow7659VVallow so7660RBso much7661RBmuch more7662JJRmore information7663NNinformation here7664RBhere to7665TOto be7666VBbe withheld7667VVNwithhold .7668SENT. It7669PPit 's7670VBZbe not7671RBnot such7672PDTsuch a7673DTa strong7674JJstrong burden7675NNburden to7676TOto say7677VVsay ...7678:... I7679PPI 'm7680VBPbe not7681RBnot saying7682VVGsay you7683PPyou have7684VHPhave to7685TOto show7686VVshow there7687EXthere will7688MDwill be7689VBbe actual7690JJactual competitive7691JJcompetitive harm7692NNharm ,7693,, just7694RBjust there7695EXthere is7696VBZbe a7697DTa likelihood7698NNlikelihood of7699INof ...7700:... of7701INof competitive7702JJcompetitive harm7703NNharm .7704SENT. And7705CCand that7706DTthat standard7707NNstandard has7708VHZhave prevailed7709VVNprevail for7710INfor 407711CD@card@ some7712DTsome years7713NNSyear .7714SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7715LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] How7716WRBHow is7717VBZbe that7718IN/thatthat different7719JJdifferent from7720INfrom substantial7721JJsubstantial harm7722NNharm ?7723SENT? That7724DTthat 's7725VBZbe the7726DTthe National7727NPNational Parks7728NPParks test7729NNtest .7730SENT. [MR. LOEB]7731LOC[MR. LOEB] So7732INso we7733PPwe think7734VVPthink the7735DTthe other7736JJother side7737NNside over-reads7738NNSover-reads the7739DTthe word7740NNword "7741``" substantial7742JJsubstantial "7743''" .7744SENT. It's7745NPIt's ,7746,, I7747PPI think7748VVPthink ,7749,, properly7750RBproperly read7751VVNread to7752TOto be7753VBbe the7754DTthe contrast7755NNcontrast ...7756:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7757LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Is7758VBZbe it7759PPit them7760PPthem or7761CCor other7762JJother courts7763NNScourt ?7764SENT? [MR. LOEB]7765LOC[MR. LOEB] I7766PPI ...7767:... I7768PPI think7769VVPthink there7770EXthere are7771VBPbe a7772DTa few7773JJfew outlier7774NNoutlier courts7775NNScourt ,7776,, but7777CCbut most7778JJSmost courts7779NNScourt have7780VHPhave applied7781VVNapply it7782PPit as7783INas the7784DTthe Eighth7785JJeighth Circuit7786NNcircuit here7787RBhere .7788SENT. It7789PPit has7790VHZhave to7791TOto distinguish7792VVdistinguish between7793INbetween substantial7794JJsubstantial and7795CCand insubstantial7796JJinsubstantial .7797SENT. And7798CCand ,7799,, here7800RBhere ,7801,, the7802DTthe district7803NNdistrict court7804NNcourt found7805VVDfind that7806IN/thatthat the7807DTthe evidence7808NNevidence presented7809VVNpresent by7810INby the7811DTthe government7812NNgovernment and7813CCand by7814INby FMI7815NPFMI to7816TOto show7817VVshow harm7818NNharm was7819VBDbe ...7820:... was7821VBDbe speculative7822JJspeculative at7823INat best7824JJSgood and7825CCand marginal7826JJmarginal at7827INat best7828JJSgood .7829SENT. So7830INso they7831PPthey ...7832:... they7833PPthey did7834VVDdo n't7835RBn't meet7836VVmeet whatever7837WDTwhatever low7838JJlow standard7839NNstandard there7840RBthere would7841MDwould ...7842:... you7843PPyou could7844MDcould articulate7845VVarticulate ,7846,, but7847CCbut the7848DTthe requirement7849NNrequirement of7850INof some7851DTsome non-insubstantial7852JJnon-insubstantial likely7853JJlikely harm7854NNharm I7855PPI do7856VVPdo n't7857RBn't think7858VVthink is7859VBZbe a7860DTa ...7861:... is7862VBZbe a7863DTa ...7864:... too7865RBtoo high7866JJhigh a7867DTa bar7868NNbar to7869TOto put7870VVput to7871TOto the7872DTthe ...7873:... the7874DTthe private7875JJprivate party7876NNparty trying7877VVGtry to7878TOto bar7879VVbar disclosure7880NNdisclosure of7881INof the7882DTthe information7883NNinformation .7884SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]7885LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] What7886WPWhat if7887INif the7888DTthe standard7889NNstandard were7890VBDbe that7891IN/thatthat the7892DTthe ...7893:... the7894DTthe agency7895NNagency must7896MDmust reasonably7897RBreasonably foresee7898VVforesee disclosure7899NNdisclosure would7900MDwould harm7901VVharm an7902DTan interest7903NNinterest protected7904VVNprotect by7905INby an7906DTan exemption7907NNexemption ?7908SENT? That7909DTthat 's7910VBZbe the7911DTthe language7912NNlanguage of7913INof the7914DTthe 20167915CD@card@ amendment7916NNamendment .7917SENT. [MR. LOEB]7918LOC[MR. LOEB] Certainly7919RBcertainly ,7920,, that7921WDTthat provides7922VVZprovide ...7923:... that7924WDTthat applies7925VVZapply now7926RBnow to7927TOto all7928DTall of7929INof the7930DTthe FOIA7931NPFOIA exemptions7932NNSexemption under7933INunder the7934DTthe 20167935CD@card@ amendment7936NNamendment .7937SENT. This7938DTthis is7939VBZbe a7940DTa pre-20167941JJpre-2016 case7942NNcase .7943SENT. [JUSTICE GINSBURG]7944LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] But7945CCbut it7946PPit ...7947:... it7948PPit applies7949VVZapply to7950TOto Exemption7951NPExemption 47952CD4 ?7953SENT? [MR. LOEB]7954LOC[MR. LOEB] It7955PPit does7956VVZdo for7957INfor future7958JJfuture cases7959NNScase .7960SENT. This7961DTthis case7962NNcase was7963VBDbe a7964DTa pre-20167965JJpre-2016 case7966NNcase ,7967,, so7968RBso it7969PPit does7970VVZdo n't7971RBn't apply7972VVapply to7973TOto this7974DTthis particular7975JJparticular case7976NNcase ,7977,, but7978CCbut it7979PPit ...7980:... it7981PPit certainly7982RBcertainly undercuts7983VVZundercut the7984DTthe arguments7985NNSargument of7986INof the7987DTthe government7988NNgovernment and7989CCand of7990INof FMI7991NPFMI that7992IN/thatthat it7993PPit 's7994VBZbe the7995DTthe ...7996:... to7997TOto require7998VVrequire a7999DTa showing8000NNshowing of8001INof harm8002NNharm requires8003VVZrequire all8004PDTall these8005DTthese trials8006NNStrial and8007CCand it8008PPit 's8009VBZbe really8010RBreally unadministrable8011JJunadministrable ,8012,, when8013WRBwhen Congress8014NPCongress not8015RBnot only8016RBonly adopted8017VVDadopt that8018IN/thatthat for8019INfor Exemption8020NPExemption 48021CD4 but8022CCbut for8023INfor all8024PDTall the8025DTthe provisions8026NNSprovision ...8027:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]8028LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] It8029PPit just8030RBjust does8031VVZdo n't8032RBn't say8033VVsay competitive8034JJcompetitive harm8035NNharm .8036SENT. It8037PPit just8038RBjust says8039VVZsay disclose8040VVdisclose what8041WPwhat harm8042VVPharm an8043DTan interest8044NNinterest protected8045VVNprotect by8046INby an8047DTan exemption8048NNexemption .8049SENT. [MR. LOEB]8050LOC[MR. LOEB] Right8051RBright .8052SENT. And8053CCand the8054DTthe courts8055NNScourt will8056MDwill have8057VHhave to8058TOto fill8059VVfill out8060RPout what8061WPwhat that8062DTthat means8063NNmeans on8064INon an8065DTan exemption-by-exemption8066NNexemption-by-exemption basis8067NNbasis and8068CCand what8069WPwhat 's8070VBZbe required8071VVNrequire and8072CCand whether8073INwhether it8074PPit 's8075VBZbe the8076DTthe government8077NNgovernment who8078WPwho believes8079VVZbelieve it8080PPit or8081CCor it8082PPit 's8083VBZbe something8084NNsomething that8085WDTthat 's8086VBZbe a8087DTa de8088NPde novo8089NNnovo review8090NNreview by8091INby the8092DTthe court8093NNcourt .8094SENT. That8095DTthat 's8096VBZbe something8097NNsomething that8098WDTthat still8099RBstill needs8100VVZneed to8101TOto be8102VBbe worked8103VVNwork out8104RPout under8105INunder the8106DTthe 20168107CD@card@ amendments8108NNSamendment .8109SENT. And8110CCand if8111INif this8112DTthis Court8113NPCourt had8114VHDhave granted8115VVNgrant a8116DTa case8117NNcase under8118INunder the8119DTthe 20168120CD@card@ amendments8121NNSamendment ,8122,, we8123PPwe ...8124:... I8125PPI think8126VVPthink we8127PPwe could8128MDcould talk8129VVtalk about8130RBabout how8131WRBhow it8132PPit applies8133VVZapply here8134RBhere ,8135,, but8136CCbut it8137PPit simply8138RBsimply does8139VVZdo n't8140RBn't apply8141VVapply to8142TOto ...8143:... to8144TOto this8145DTthis particular8146JJparticular ...8147:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]8148LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] May8149NPmay ...8150:... may8151MDmay I8152PPI ask8153VVask ,8154,, Mr8155NPMr .8156SENT. Loeb8157NPLoeb ,8158,, if8159INif ...8160:... if8161INif I8162PPI were8163VBDbe to8164TOto say8165VVsay to8166TOto you8167PPyou give8168VVgive me8169PPme your8170PP$your best8171JJSgood shot8172NNshot on8173INon a8174DTa textual8175JJtextual argument8176NNargument for8177INfor your8178PP$your position8179NNposition ,8180,, so8181RBso putting8182VVGput aside8183RPaside subsequent8184JJsubsequent congressional8185JJcongressional inaction8186NNinaction ,8187,, putting8188VVGput aside8189RBaside how8190WRBhow many8191JJmany courts8192NNScourt have8193VHPhave adopted8194VVNadopt this8195DTthis test8196NNtest ,8197,, just8198RBjust sort8199RBsort of8200INof give8201VVgive me8202PPme your8203PP$your best8204JJSgood shot8205NNshot for8206INfor why8207WRBwhy this8208DTthis is8209VBZbe the8210DTthe right8211JJright way8212NNway to8213TOto read8214VVread the8215DTthe text8216NNtext ,8217,, what8218WPwhat would8219MDwould you8220PPyou say8221VVsay ?8222SENT? [MR. LOEB]8223LOC[MR. LOEB] I8224PPI would8225MDwould say8226VVsay you8227PPyou have8228VHPhave to8229TOto look8230VVlook at8231INat words8232NNSword in8233INin context8234NNcontext and8235CCand that8236IN/thatthat their8237PP$their neighbors8238NNSneighbor inform8239VVinform their8240PP$their meaning8241NNmeaning .8242SENT. And8243CCand as8244INas this8245DTthis Court8246NPCourt has8247VHZhave said8248VVNsay under8249INunder ...8250:... when8251WRBwhen it8252PPit 's8253VBZbe looked8254VVNlook at8255INat other8256JJother FOIA8257NPFOIA provisions8258NNSprovision ,8259,, that8260WDTthat you8261PPyou first8262RBfirst look8263VVPlook to8264TOto the8265DTthe common8266JJcommon law8267NNlaw to8268TOto help8269VVhelp inform8270VVinform what8271WPwhat the8272DTthe language8273NNlanguage means8274VVZmean .8275SENT. Where8276WRBwhere a8277DTa plain8278JJplain language8279NNlanguage is8280VBZbe ,8281,, they8282PPthey just8283RBjust want8284VVPwant to8285TOto look8286VVlook at8287INat dictionaries8288NNSdictionary ,8289,, but8290CCbut even8291RBeven the8292DTthe dictionaries8293NNSdictionary are8294VBPbe ambiguous8295JJambiguous .8296SENT. But8297CCbut the8298DTthe common8299JJcommon law8300NNlaw tells8301VVZtell you8302PPyou at8303INat the8304DTthe time8305NNtime that8306IN/thatthat Congress8307NPCongress chose8308VVDchoose the8309DTthe word8310NNword "8311``" trade8312NNtrade secrets8313NNSsecret ,8314,, "8315''" which8316WDTwhich has8317VHZhave a8318DTa common8319JJcommon law8320NNlaw meaning8321NNmeaning which8322WDTwhich requires8323VVZrequire competitive8324JJcompetitive harm8325NNharm .8326SENT. And8327CCand the8328DTthe restatement8329NNrestatement as8330INas well8331RBwell said8332VVNsay there8333EXthere was8334VBDbe a8335DTa second8336JJsecond category8337NNcategory of8338INof business8339NNbusiness information8340NNinformation and8341CCand that8342IN/thatthat it8343PPit was8344VBDbe treated8345VVNtreat the8346DTthe same8347JJsame way8348NNway under8349INunder the8350DTthe same8351JJsame standard8352NNstandard and8353CCand required8354JJrequired competitive8355JJcompetitive harm8356NNharm .8357SENT. So8358RBso you8359PPyou look8360VVPlook at8361INat the8362DTthe plain8363JJplain language8364NNlanguage there8365RBthere of8366INof trade8367NNtrade secrets8368NNSsecret and8369CCand financial8370JJfinancial and8371CCand commercial8372JJcommercial information8373NNinformation that8374WDTthat 's8375VBZbe confidential8376JJconfidential ,8377,, and8378CCand understand8379VVPunderstand that8380IN/thatthat those8381DTthose were8382VBDbe terms8383NNSterm of8384INof art8385NNart that8386WDTthat were8387VBDbe used8388VVNuse in8389INin the8390DTthe common8391JJcommon law8392NNlaw ,8393,, and8394CCand these8395DTthese ...8396:... these8397DTthese words8398NNSword did8399VVDdo n't8400RBn't fall8401VVfall from8402INfrom the8403DTthe sky8404NNsky and8405CCand just8406RBjust randomly8407RBrandomly appear8408VVappear here8409RBhere .8410SENT. They8411PPthey chose8412VVDchoose common8413JJcommon law8414NNlaw terms8415NNSterm ,8416,, trade8417NNtrade secrets8418NNSsecret and8419CCand the8420DTthe closely8421RBclosely related8422VVNrelate commercial8423JJcommercial confidential8424JJconfidential information8425NNinformation .8426SENT. And8427CCand the8428DTthe courts8429NNScourt have8430VHPhave used8431VVNuse and8432CCand the8433DTthe rules8434NNSrule and8435CCand the8436DTthe statutes8437NNSstatute have8438VHPhave referred8439VVNrefer to8440TOto those8441DTthose two8442CDtwo bodies8443NNSbody together8444RBtogether .8445SENT. And8446CCand if8447INif you8448PPyou look8449VVPlook at8450INat this8451DTthis Court8452NPCourt 's8453POS's decision8454NNdecision in8455INin FMOC8456NPFMOC versus8457CCversus Merrill8458NPMerrill ,8459,, you8460PPyou were8461VBDbe there8462RBthere saying8463VVGsay ,8464,, regarding8465VVGregard a8466DTa different8467JJdifferent exemption8468NNexemption as8469RBas to8470TOto privileges8471NNSprivilege ,8472,, we8473PPwe 're8474VBPbe going8475VVGgo to8476TOto protect8477VVprotect trade8478NNtrade secrets8479NNSsecret and8480CCand confidential8481JJconfidential business8482NNbusiness information8483NNinformation ,8484,, because8485INbecause those8486DTthose ...8487:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8488LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] The8489DTthe problem8490NNproblem I8491PPI have8492VHPhave is8493VBZbe that8494IN/thatthat the8495DTthe common8496JJcommon law8497NNlaw did8498VVDdo n't8499RBn't use8500VVuse it8501PPit the8502DTthe way8503NNway ...8504:... did8505VVDdo n't8506RBn't borrow8507VVborrow a8508DTa term8509NNterm of8510INof art8511NNart .8512SENT. This8513DTthis says8514VVZsay trade8515NNtrade secrets8516NNSsecret and8517CCand financial8518JJfinancial and8519CCand commercial8520JJcommercial materials8521NNSmaterial ,8522,, but8523CCbut that8524DTthat 's8525VBZbe not8526RBnot how8527WRBhow the8528DTthe ...8529:... how8530WRBhow the8531DTthe common8532JJcommon law8533NNlaw used8534VVDuse it8535PPit .8536SENT. The8537DTthe common8538JJcommon law8539NNlaw used8540VVNuse other8541JJother words8542NNSword ,8543,, like8544INlike private8545JJprivate commercial8546JJcommercial information8547NNinformation or8548CCor other8549JJother sorts8550NNSsort of8551INof words8552NNSword .8553SENT. So8554RBso it8555PPit 's8556VBZbe not8557RBnot a8558DTa direct8559JJdirect taking8560NNtaking from8561INfrom the8562DTthe common8563JJcommon law8564NNlaw .8565SENT. [MR. LOEB]8566LOC[MR. LOEB] No8567NPNo ,8568,, it8569PPit 's8570VBZbe not8571RBnot like8572INlike the8573DTthe word8574NNword "8575``" fraud8576NNfraud "8577''" and8578CCand ...8579:... every8580DTevery time8581NNtime the8582DTthe word8583NNword "8584``" fraud8585NNfraud "8586''" is8587VBZbe used8588VVNuse ,8589,, you8590PPyou would8591MDwould look8592VVlook at8593INat the8594DTthe common8595JJcommon law8596NNlaw ,8597,, but8598CCbut this8599DTthis is8600VBZbe a8601DTa ...8602:... it8603PPit was8604VBDbe clear8605JJclear that8606IN/thatthat the8607DTthe restatement8608NNrestatement and8609CCand the8610DTthe common8611JJcommon law8612NNlaw had8613VHDhave two8614CDtwo boxes8615NNSbox of8616INof protected8617JJprotected business8618NNbusiness information8619NNinformation ,8620,, trade8621NNtrade secrets8622NNSsecret and8623CCand confidential8624JJconfidential commercial8625NNcommercial ...8626:... commercial8627JJcommercial and8628CCand financial8629JJfinancial information8630NNinformation .8631SENT. And8632CCand for8633INfor both8634DTboth of8635INof them8636PPthem ,8637,, they8638PPthey required8639VVDrequire some8640DTsome showing8641NNshowing of8642INof ...8643:... of8644INof ...8645:... of8646INof significant8647JJsignificant ...8648:... of8649INof competitive8650JJcompetitive harm8651NNharm .8652SENT. It8653PPit was8654VBDbe n't8655RBn't to8656TOto turn8657VVturn on8658INon ...8659:... on8660INon the8661DTthe particular8662JJparticular unilateral8663JJunilateral view8664NNview of8665INof the8666DTthe submitter8667NNsubmitter .8668SENT. So8669INso I8670PPI ...8671:... I8672PPI ...8673:... I8674PPI think8675VVPthink that8676WDTthat 's8677VBZbe ...8678:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]8679LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] You8680PPyou 'd8681MDwould agree8682VVagree ,8683,, though8684RBthough ,8685,, that8686IN/thatthat when8687WRBwhen ...8688:... when8689WRBwhen Congress8690NPCongress uses8691VVZuse words8692NNSword that8693WDTthat are8694VBPbe different8695JJdifferent from8696INfrom common8697JJcommon law8698NNlaw terms8699NNSterm that8700WDTthat are8701VBPbe invested8702VVNinvest with8703INwith meaning8704NNmeaning ,8705,, we8706PPwe usually8707RBusually presume8708VVPpresume that8709IN/thatthat it8710PPit means8711VVZmean something8712NNsomething different8713JJdifferent ?8714SENT? [MR. LOEB]8715LOC[MR. LOEB] I8716PPI ...8717:... I8718PPI think8719VVPthink here8720RBhere that8721IN/thatthat common8722JJcommon law8723NNlaw developed8724VVNdevelop in8725INin a8726DTa way8727NNway where8728WRBwhere they8729PPthey 're8730VBPbe talking8731VVGtalk about8732INabout a8733DTa class8734NNclass of8735INof information8736NNinformation and8737CCand it8738PPit 's8739VBZbe clear8740JJclear that8741IN/thatthat Congress8742NPCongress is8743VBZbe referring8744VVGrefer to8745TOto that8746DTthat class8747NNclass information8748NNinformation .8749SENT. It8750PPit 's8751VBZbe not8752RBnot ...8753:... so8754RBso this8755DTthis is8756VBZbe not8757RBnot a8758DTa ...8759:... a8760DTa term8761NNterm of8762INof art8763NNart where8764WRBwhere you8765PPyou have8766VHPhave like8767INlike one8768CDone word8769NNword which8770WDTwhich triggers8771VVZtrigger it8772PPit .8773SENT. You're8774NNYou're ...8775:... you8776PPyou 're8777VBPbe clearly8778RBclearly talking8779VVGtalk about8780INabout that8781DTthat same8782JJsame second8783JJsecond box8784NNbox of8785INof information8786NNinformation ,8787,, which8788WDTwhich has8789VHZhave been8790VBNbe protected8791VVNprotect by8792INby the8793DTthe common8794JJcommon law8795NNlaw and8796CCand is8797VBZbe being8798VBGbe ...8799:... is8800VBZbe being8801VBGbe referred8802VVNrefer to8803TOto here8804RBhere by8805INby the8806DTthe reference8807NNreference to8808TOto commercial8809JJcommercial and8810CCand financial8811JJfinancial confidential8812JJconfidential information8813NNinformation .8814SENT. You8815PPyou 'll8816MDwill see8817VVsee again8818RBagain and8819CCand again8820RBagain in8821INin the8822DTthe courts8823NNScourt ,8824,, in8825INin the8826DTthe rules8827NNSrule ,8828,, in8829INin sealing8830VVGseal rules8831NNSrule ,8832,, in8833INin the8834DTthe Federal8835NPFederal Rules8836NPSRules of8837INof Procedure8838NPProcedure ,8839,, likewise8840RBlikewise speak8841VVspeak to8842TOto the8843DTthe same8844JJsame classes8845NNSclass of8846INof trade8847NNtrade secrets8848NNSsecret and8849CCand confidential8850JJconfidential business8851NNbusiness information8852NNinformation ,8853,, and8854CCand all8855DTall of8856INof them8857PPthem require8858VVPrequire some8859DTsome level8860NNlevel of8861INof harm8862NNharm .8863SENT. None8864NNnone of8865INof them8866PPthem just8867RBjust turn8868VVPturn on8869INon ...8870:... [JUSTICE BREYER]8871LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I8872PPI agree8873VVPagree with8874INwith that8875DTthat ,8876,, but8877CCbut what8878WPwhat ...8879:... what8880WPwhat happens8881VVZhappen if8882INif ...8883:... if8884INif the8885DTthe company8886NNcompany ,8887,, a8888DTa firm8889NNfirm ,8890,, A8891NPA ,8892,, says8893VVZsay to8894TOto a8895DTa group8896NNgroup of8897INof customers8898NNScustomer ,8899,, we8900PPwe would8901MDwould like8902VVlike some8903DTsome information8904NNinformation from8905INfrom you8906PPyou which8907WDTwhich is8908VBZbe private8909JJprivate ,8910,, it8911PPit 'll8912MDwill help8913VVhelp us8914PPus in8915INin our8916PP$our business8917NNbusiness .8918SENT. And8919CCand they8920PPthey say8921VVPsay ,8922,, whoa8923NNwhoa ,8924,, no8925UHno ,8926,, I8927PPI do8928VVPdo n't8929RBn't want8930VVwant this8931DTthis to8932TOto get8933VVget out8934RPout .8935SENT. They8936PPthey say8937VVPsay ,8938,, we8939PPwe promise8940VVPpromise it8941PPit won8942MDwill 't8943RB't ,8944,, and8945CCand if8946INif it8947PPit ever8948RBever should8949MDshould ,8950,, we8951PPwe 'll8952MDwill pay8953VVpay you8954PPyou a8955DTa lot8956NNlot of8957INof money8958NNmoney .8959SENT. Lo8960NPLo and8961CCand behold8962VVbehold ,8963,, it8964PPit 's8965VBZbe made8966VVNmake public8967JJpublic .8968SENT. It8969PPit does8970VVZdo n't8971RBn't hurt8972VVhurt them8973PPthem commercially8974RBcommercially in8975INin the8976DTthe term8977NNterm of8978INof competition8979NNcompetition ,8980,, but8981CCbut it8982PPit does8983VVZdo hurt8984VVhurt them8985PPthem because8986INbecause they8987PPthey have8988VHPhave to8989TOto pay8990VVpay a8991DTa lot8992NNlot of8993INof money8994NNmoney .8995SENT. Now8996RBnow does8997VVZdo that8998DTthat fall8999NNfall within9000INwithin the9001DTthe statute9002NNstatute as9003INas you9004PPyou understand9005VVPunderstand it9006PPit ?9007SENT? [MR. LOEB]9008LOC[MR. LOEB] Well9009UHwell ,9010,, I9011PPI mean9012VVPmean ,9013,, your9014PP$your analogy9015NNanalogy speaks9016VVZspeak to9017TOto a9018DTa private9019JJprivate party9020NNparty getting9021VVGget ...9022:... a9023DTa company9024NNcompany getting9025VVGget private9026JJprivate information9027NNinformation .9028SENT. [JUSTICE BREYER]9029LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah9030NPYeah ,9031,, yeah9032RByeah ,9033,, and9034CCand ,9035,, of9036INof course9037NNcourse ...9038:... [MR. LOEB]9039LOC[MR. LOEB] And9040CCand would9041MDwould there9042RBthere be9043VBbe any9044DTany ...9045:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9046LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] That9047DTthat 's9048VBZbe right9049JJright .9050SENT. And9051CCand then9052RBthen they9053PPthey give9054VVPgive it9055PPit to9056TOto the9057DTthe government9058NNgovernment ,9059,, and9060CCand they9061PPthey ...9062:... they9063PPthey use9064VVPuse it9065PPit and9066CCand ,9067,, you9068PPyou know9069VVPknow ,9070,, all9071PDTall the9072DTthe rest9073NNrest takes9074VVZtake place9075NNplace as9076RBas is9077VBZbe .9078SENT. [MR. LOEB]9079LOC[MR. LOEB] All9080DTall right9081NNright .9082SENT. So9083RBso there9084EXthere could9085MDcould be9086VBbe a9087DTa breach9088NNbreach of9089INof contract9090NNcontract in9091INin that9092DTthat situation9093NNsituation ...9094:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9095LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah9096NPYeah .9097SENT. [MR. LOEB]9098LOC[MR. LOEB] ...9099:... there9100EXthere is9101VBZbe a9102DTa contract9103NNcontract ,9104,, and9105CCand there9106EXthere could9107MDcould be9108VBbe damages9109NNSdamage under9110INunder this9111DTthis contract9112NNcontract ...9113:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9114LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Yeah9115NPYeah .9116SENT. [MR. LOEB]9117LOC[MR. LOEB] ...9118:... but9119CCbut we9120PPwe 're9121VBPbe talking9122VVGtalk about9123INabout a9124DTa class9125NNclass of9126INof information9127NNinformation ...9128:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9129LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Well9130UHWell ,9131,, all9132DTall right9133NNright .9134SENT. But9135CCbut does9136VVZdo the9137DTthe government9138NNgovernment ...9139:... does9140VVZdo that9141DTthat fall9142NNfall within9143INwithin the9144DTthe exemption9145NNexemption ?9146SENT? If9147INif the9148DTthe government9149NNgovernment gets9150VVZget the9151DTthe information9152NNinformation ,9153,, does9154VVZdo that9155IN/thatthat fall9156NNfall within9157INwithin the9158DTthe exemption9159NNexemption ?9160SENT? Because9161INbecause it9162PPit was9163VBDbe confidential9164JJconfidential information9165NNinformation ,9166,, the9167DTthe company9168NNcompany was9169VBDbe harmed9170VVNharm through9171INthrough its9172PP$its release9173NNrelease .9174SENT. It9175PPit 's9176VBZbe just9177RBjust hard9178JJhard to9179TOto say9180VVsay that9181IN/thatthat that9182DTthat was9183VBDbe competitive9184JJcompetitive harm9185NNharm .9186SENT. They9187PPthey may9188MDmay have9189VHhave had9190VHNhave to9191TOto pay9192VVpay 429193CD@card@ million9194CDmillion dollars9195NNSdollar ,9196,, I9197PPI do9198VVPdo n't9199RBn't know9200VVknow how9201WRBhow much9202JJmuch ,9203,, but9204CCbut ...9205:... but9206CCbut it9207PPit was9208VBDbe harm9209NNharm .9210SENT. And9211CCand it9212PPit was9213VBDbe confidential9214JJconfidential .9215SENT. So9216RBso it9217PPit 's9218VBZbe literally9219RBliterally within9220INwithin the9221DTthe statute9222NNstatute .9223SENT. [MR. LOEB]9224LOC[MR. LOEB] I9225PPI ...9226:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9227LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And9228CCand I9229PPI want9230VVPwant to9231TOto know9232VVknow about9233INabout that9234DTthat .9235SENT. [MR. YANG]9236LOC[MR. YANG] I9237PPI do9238VVPdo n't9239RBn't ...9240:... I9241PPI do9242VVPdo n't9243RBn't think9244VVthink it9245PPit would9246MDwould be9247VBbe within9248INwithin the9249DTthe statute9250NNstatute .9251SENT. The9252DTthe statute9253NNstatute 's9254VBZbe referring9255VVGrefer to9256TOto commercial9257JJcommercial and9258CCand financial9259JJfinancial information9260NNinformation that9261WDTthat 's9262VBZbe obtained9263VVNobtain from9264INfrom ...9265:... [JUSTICE BREYER]9266LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] No9267RBno ,9268,, it9269PPit is9270VBZbe commercial9271JJcommercial and9272CCand financial9273JJfinancial information9274NNinformation .9275SENT. That9276DTthat 's9277VBZbe what9278WPwhat it9279PPit is9280VBZbe .9281SENT. I9282PPI just9283RBjust ...9284:... you9285PPyou ...9286:... you9287PPyou do9288VVPdo ...9289:... go9290VVgo that9291DTthat way9292NNway .9293SENT. I9294PPI 'll9295MDwill just9296RBjust assume9297VVassume it9298PPit into9299INinto my9300PP$my hypothetical9301JJhypothetical .9302SENT. [9303SYM[ LAUGHTER9304NNlaughter ]9305SYM] [JUSTICE BREYER]9306LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] I9307PPI 'm9308VBPbe still9309RBstill focusing9310VVGfocus on9311INon what9312WPwhat words9313NNSword ...9314:... you9315PPyou do9316VVPdo n't9317RBn't have9318VHhave to9319TOto write9320VVwrite this9321DTthis ,9322,, but9323CCbut I9324PPI might9325MDmight .9326SENT. [9327SYM[ LAUGHTER9328NNlaughter ]9329SYM] [JUSTICE BREYER]9330LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] And9331CCand I9332PPI ...9333:... and9334CCand I9335PPI have9336VHPhave ...9337:... and9338CCand I9339PPI have9340VHPhave to9341TOto write9342VVwrite down9343RPdown something9344NNsomething by9345INby the9346DTthe word9347NNword "9348``" harm9349NNharm ,9350,, "9351''" and9352CCand that9353DTthat word9354NNword ...9355:... that9356DTthat word9357NNword "9358``" competitive9359JJcompetitive harm9360NNharm "9361''" is9362VBZbe still9363RBstill giving9364VVGgive me9365PPme some9366DTsome trouble9367NNtrouble ,9368,, and9369CCand I'm9370NPI'm ...9371:... that9372WDTthat 's9373VBZbe why9374WRBwhy I9375PPI 'm9376VBPbe asking9377VVGask these9378DTthese questions9379NNSquestion .9380SENT. [MR. LOEB]9381LOC[MR. LOEB] Right9382RBright .9383SENT. Well9384UHwell ,9385,, it9386PPit ...9387:... it9388PPit has9389VHZhave to9390TOto be9391VBbe obtained9392VVNobtain from9393INfrom a9394DTa person9395NNperson and9396CCand you9397PPyou look9398VVPlook at9399INat whether9400INwhether there9401EXthere was9402VBDbe harm9403NNharm to9404TOto that9405DTthat ...9406:... that9407IN/thatthat party9408NNparty who9409WPwho is9410VBZbe ...9411:... who9412WPwho it9413PPit was9414VBDbe obtained9415VVNobtain from9416INfrom ,9417,, which9418WDTwhich would9419MDwould be9420VBbe the9421DTthe ...9422:... the9423DTthe company9424NNcompany or9425CCor ...9426:... and9427CCand if9428INif it9429PPit ...9430:... but9431CCbut if9432INif it9433PPit was9434VBDbe information9435NNinformation that9436IN/thatthat pertained9437VVNpertain to9438TOto the9439DTthe individual9440NNindividual ,9441,, it9442PPit could9443MDcould perhaps9444RBperhaps be9445VBbe protected9446VVNprotect by9447INby other9448JJother provisions9449NNSprovision ,9450,, like9451INlike the9452DTthe Privacy9453NNprivacy Act9454NNact ,9455,, to9456TOto ...9457:... to9458TOto ...9459:... to9460TOto ...9461:... extends9462VVZextend to9463TOto a9464DTa large9465JJlarge degree9466NNdegree of9467INof ...9468:... of9469INof information9470NNinformation regarding9471VVGregard a9472DTa particular9473JJparticular individual9474JJindividual citizen9475NNcitizen ,9476,, which9477WDTwhich is9478VBZbe possessed9479VVNpossess by9480INby the9481DTthe government9482NNgovernment ,9483,, which9484WDTwhich then9485RBthen should9486MDshould n't9487RBn't be9488VBbe disclosed9489VVNdisclose .9490SENT. So9491RBso there9492EXthere are9493VBPbe other9494JJother exemptions9495NNSexemption that9496WDTthat cover9497VVPcover information9498NNinformation which9499WDTwhich goes9500VVZgo to9501TOto private9502JJprivate information9503NNinformation of9504INof an9505DTan individual9506NNindividual .9507SENT. Here9508RBhere ,9509,, we9510PPwe 're9511VBPbe talking9512VVGtalk about9513RBabout commercial9514JJcommercial and9515CCand financial9516JJfinancial information9517NNinformation .9518SENT. It9519PPit was9520VBDbe enacted9521VVNenact together9522RBtogether with9523INwith trade9524NNtrade secrets9525NNSsecret ,9526,, both9527CCboth being9528VBGbe common9529JJcommon law9530NNlaw terms9531NNSterm ,9532,, and9533CCand it9534PPit would9535MDwould be9536VBbe inappropriate9537JJinappropriate to9538TOto sort9539VVsort of9540INof expand9541VVexpand it9542PPit to9543TOto a9544DTa global9545JJglobal confidentiality9546NNconfidentiality term9547NNterm .9548SENT. Here9549RBhere ,9550,, you9551PPyou know9552VVPknow ,9553,, FMI9554NPFMI is9555VBZbe basically9556RBbasically suggesting9557VVGsuggest a9558DTa unilateral9559JJunilateral approach9560NNapproach to9561TOto say9562VVsay as9563RBas long9564RBlong as9565INas they9566PPthey treat9567VVPtreat it9568PPit as9569INas secret9570JJsecret and9571CCand confidential9572JJconfidential ,9573,, that9574IN/thatthat this9575DTthis Court9576NPCourt should9577MDshould fall9578VVfall in9579INin line9580NNline as9581INas well9582RBwell .9583SENT. That9584DTthat would9585MDwould dramatically9586RBdramatically alter9587VValter the9588DTthe scheme9589NNscheme of9590INof FOIA9591NPFOIA ,9592,, the9593DTthe one9594CDone which9595WDTwhich ...9596:... Congress9597NPCongress has9598VHZhave reenacted9599VVNreenact Exemption9600NPExemption 49601CD4 for9602INfor 269603CD@card@ times9604NNStime ,9605,, again9606RBagain and9607CCand again9608RBagain after9609INafter there9610EXthere was9611VBDbe a9612DTa ...9613:... a9614DTa universal9615JJuniversal reading9616NNreading of9617INof this9618DTthis provision9619NNprovision .9620SENT. First9621JJfirst of9622INof all9623DTall ,9624,, FMI9625NPFMI 's9626POS's counsel9627NNcounsel here9628RBhere says9629VVZsay that9630IN/thatthat this9631DTthis information9632NNinformation is9633VBZbe n't9634RBn't important9635JJimportant ,9636,, does9637VVZdo n't9638RBn't show9639VVshow what9640WPwhat the9641DTthe government9642NNgovernment is9643VBZbe up9644RBup to9645TOto .9646SENT. How9647WRBHow the9648DTthe government9649NNgovernment spends9650VVZspend its9651PP$its own9652JJown money9653NNmoney is9654VBZbe critical9655JJcritical information9656NNinformation that9657IN/thatthat the9658DTthe press9659NNpress and9660CCand the9661DTthe public9662JJpublic need9663NNneed to9664TOto know9665VVknow .9666SENT. It9667PPit 's9668VBZbe the9669DTthe type9670NNtype of9671INof information9672NNinformation that9673IN/thatthat FOIA9674NPFOIA has9675VHZhave been9676VBNbe used9677VVNuse for9678INfor decades9679NNSdecade to9680TOto reveal9681VVreveal ,9682,, you9683PPyou know9684VVPknow ,9685,, the9686DTthe Navy9687NPNavy using9688VVGuse ...9689:... spending9690VVGspend $9691$$ 6709692CD@card@ on9693INon toilet9694NNtoilet seats9695NNSseat ,9696,, to9697TOto the9698DTthe bail-out9699JJbail-out funds9700NNSfund being9701VBGbe abused9702VVNabuse and9703CCand wasted9704VVNwaste ,9705,, et9706CCet cetera9707NPcetera ,9708,, et9709NPet cetera9710NPcetera .9711SENT. We9712PPwe lay9713VVDlie out9714RPout examples9715NNSexample in9716INin our9717PP$our brief9718NNbrief .9719SENT. Under9720INunder their9721PP$their test9722NNtest ,9723,, that9724WDTthat would9725MDwould ...9726:... could9727MDcould all9728RBall now9729RBnow be9730VBbe claimed9731VVNclaim confidential9732JJconfidential by9733INby the9734DTthe parties9735NNSparty saying9736VVGsay ,9737,, look9738VVlook ,9739,, this9740DTthis reveals9741VVZreveal our9742PP$our side9743NNside of9744INof the9745DTthe business9746NNbusiness .9747SENT. Two9748CDTwo sides9749NNSside of9750INof the9751DTthe coin9752NNcoin .9753SENT. You9754PPyou spend9755VVPspend the9756DTthe money9757NNmoney ,9758,, we9759PPwe submit9760VVPsubmit it9761PPit .9762SENT. We9763PPwe did9764VVDdo the9765DTthe work9766NNwork .9767SENT. We9768PPwe do9769VVPdo n't9770RBn't want9771VVwant you9772PPyou to9773TOto reveal9774VVreveal that9775DTthat .9776SENT. That9777DTthat would9778MDwould be9779VBbe a9780DTa ...9781:... a9782DTa ...9783:... a9784DTa dramatic9785JJdramatic change9786NNchange of9787INof the9788DTthe way9789NNway that9790IN/thatthat FOIA9791NPFOIA ...9792:... FOIA9793NPFOIA has9794VHZhave been9795VBNbe applied9796VVNapply for9797INfor more9798JJRmore than9799INthan 409800CD@card@ years9801NNSyear .9802SENT. Also9803RBalso to9804TOto the9805DTthe regulatory9806JJregulatory regime9807NNregime .9808SENT. We9809PPwe have9810VHPhave ...9811:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]9812LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] May9813NPmay I9814PPI ...9815:... may9816MDmay I9817PPI ask9818VVask you9819PPyou a9820DTa question9821VVPquestion about9822RBabout now9823RBnow ...9824:... now9825RBnow that9826IN/thatthat the9827DTthe ...9828:... the9829DTthe circuit9830NNcircuit court9831NNcourt was9832VBDbe wrong9833JJwrong about9834INabout Exemption9835NPExemption 39836CD3 under9837INunder the9838DTthe clarification9839NNclarification that9840IN/thatthat Congress9841NPCongress provided9842VVDprovide ,9843,, so9844RBso are9845VBPbe we9846PPwe supposed9847VVNsuppose to9848TOto just9849RBjust ignore9850VVignore that9851DTthat ?9852SENT? That's9853NNSThat's ...9854:... [MR. LOEB]9855LOC[MR. LOEB] Well9856UHwell ,9857,, we9858PPwe ...9859:... we9860PPwe do9861VVPdo n't9862RBn't believe9863VVbelieve that9864DTthat ...9865:... that9866IN/thatthat the9867DTthe ...9868:... the9869DTthe new9870JJnew version9871NNversion of9872INof 20189873CD@card@ (9874(( c9875LSc )9876)) changes9877VVZchange the9878DTthe law9879NNlaw about9880INabout this9881DTthis case9882NNcase at9883INat all9884DTall .9885SENT. It9886PPit 's9887VBZbe prospective9888JJprospective .9889SENT. This9890DTthis is9891VBZbe information9892NNinformation that9893WDTthat was9894VBDbe submitted9895VVNsubmit under9896INunder that9897DTthat amendment9898NNamendment .9899SENT. And9900CCand we9901PPwe do9902VVPdo n't9903RBn't think9904VVthink that9905DTthat ...9906:... that9907DTthat amendment9908NNamendment also9909RBalso applies9910VVZapply to9911TOto the9912DTthe application9913NNapplication process9914NNprocess ,9915,, not9916RBnot to9917TOto the9918DTthe ...9919:... the9920DTthe monthly9921JJmonthly and9922CCand annual9923JJannual data9924NNSdatum that9925DTthat we're9926NNwe're ...9927:... we9928PPwe 're9929VBPbe seeking9930VVGseek here9931RBhere .9932SENT. But9933CCbut ,9934,, as9935INas some9936DTsome earlier9937JJRearly questions9938NNSquestion pointed9939VVDpoint out9940RPout ,9941,, if9942INif the9943DTthe government9944NNgovernment wants9945VVZwant to9946TOto seek9947VVseek relief9948NNrelief on9949INon remand9950NNremand ,9951,, if9952INif you9953PPyou rule9954VVPrule for9955INfor us9956PPus and9957CCand it9958PPit goes9959VVZgo back9960RBback ,9961,, they9962PPthey can9963MDcan go9964VVgo to9965TOto the9966DTthe district9967NNdistrict court9968NNcourt before9969INbefore the9970DTthe information9971NNinformation is9972VBZbe ...9973:... is9974VBZbe disclosed9975VVNdisclose and9976CCand say9977VVPsay we9978PPwe want9979VVPwant to9980TOto reopen9981VVreopen the9982DTthe judgment9983NNjudgment based9984VVNbase on9985INon a9986DTa change9987NNchange of9988INof the9989DTthe law9990NNlaw .9991SENT. And9992CCand we9993PPwe could9994MDcould litigate9995VVlitigate that9996IN/thatthat here9997RBhere .9998SENT. That9999DTthat 's10000VBZbe not10001RBnot something10002NNsomething to10003TOto be10004VBbe litigated10005VVNlitigate in10006INin this10007DTthis Court10008NPCourt ,10009,, the10010DTthe meaning10011NNmeaning of10012INof 201810013CD@card@ (10014(( c10015LSc )10016)) .10017SENT. So10018RBso I10019PPI do10020VVPdo n't10021RBn't think10022VVthink that10023DTthat ...10024:... that10025DTthat ...10026:... that10027IN/thatthat with10028INwith ...10029:... the10030DTthe Eighth10031JJeighth Circuit10032NNcircuit was10033VBDbe correct10034JJcorrect in10035INin how10036WRBhow it10037PPit read10038VVPread 201810039RB@card@ (10040(( c10041LSc )10042)) ,10043,, there10044EXthere was10045VBDbe no10046DTno ...10047:... no10048DTno one10049CDone 's10050VBZbe asking10051VVGask this10052DTthis Court10053NPCourt to10054TOto review10055VVreview that10056IN/thatthat ,10057,, and10058CCand the10059DTthe new10060JJnew amendment10061NNamendment does10062VVZdo n't10063RBn't alter10064VValter how10065WRBhow this10066DTthis Court10067NPCourt should10068MDshould dispose10069VVdispose of10070INof this10071DTthis case10072NNcase .10073SENT. If10074INif they10075PPthey 're10076VBPbe ...10077:... they10078PPthey want10079VVPwant to10080TOto make10081VVmake an10082DTan argument10083NNargument on10084INon remand10085NNremand ,10086,, they10087PPthey are10088VBPbe free10089JJfree to10090TOto do10091VVdo so10092RBso .10093SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]10094LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] You10095PPyou seem10096VVPseem to10097TOto be10098VBbe making10099VVGmake two10100CDtwo distinct10101JJdistinct arguments10102NNSargument about10103INabout National10104NPNational Parks10105NPParks .10106SENT. One10107PPone is10108VBZbe National10109NPNational Parks10110NPParks is10111VBZbe correct10112JJcorrect .10113SENT. Two10114CDTwo ,10115,, alternatively10116RBalternatively ,10117,, is10118VBZbe even10119RBeven if10120INif National10121NPNational Parks10122NPParks is10123VBZbe incorrect10124JJincorrect ,10125,, we10126PPwe think10127VVPthink we10128PPwe should10129MDshould nonetheless10130RBnonetheless follow10131VVfollow it10132PPit .10133SENT. On10134INon that10135DTthat second10136JJsecond argument10137NNargument ,10138,, how10139WRBhow can10140MDcan that10141RBthat be10142VBbe squared10143VVNsquare with10144INwith Milner10145NPMilner ?10146SENT? [MR. LOEB]10147LOC[MR. LOEB] Again10148NPAgain ,10149,, Milner10150NPMilner was10151VBDbe a10152DTa very10153RBvery different10154JJdifferent concept10155NNconcept .10156SENT. It10157PPit was10158VBDbe really10159RBreally a10160DTa judicial10161JJjudicial acquiescence10162NNacquiescence to10163TOto ...10164:... to10165TOto Congress10166NPCongress not10167RBnot changing10168VVGchange the10169DTthe law10170NNlaw of10171INof ...10172:... of10173INof Exemption10174NPExemption 210175CD2 .10176SENT. And10177CCand ...10178:... and10179CCand this10180DTthis Court10181NPCourt 's10182POS's opinion10183NNopinion said10184VVDsay there10185EXthere was10186VBDbe n't10187RBn't a10188DTa judicial10189JJjudicial consensus10190NNconsensus ,10191,, so10192RBso you10193PPyou would10194MDwould n't10195RBn't even10196RBeven ...10197:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]10198LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Why10199NPWhy ...10200:... [MR. LOEB]10201LOC[MR. LOEB] ...10202:... assume10203VVassume that10204IN/thatthat Congress10205NPCongress had10206VHDhave one10207CDone way10208NNway or10209CCor the10210DTthe other10211JJother ...10212:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]10213LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Let10214VVlet me10215PPme take10216VVtake it10217PPit out10218RPout from10219INfrom under10220INunder Milner10221NPMilner then10222RBthen and10223CCand just10224RBjust say10225VVsay why10226WRBwhy ,10227,, if10228INif we10229PPwe disagree10230VVPdisagree with10231INwith National10232NPNational Parks10233NPParks ,10234,, the10235DTthe D10236NPD .10237SENT. C10238LSc .10239SENT. Circu10240NPCircu it10241PPit 's10242VBZbe decision10243NNdecision ,10244,, should10245MDshould we10246PPwe nonetheless10247RBnonetheless follow10248VVfollow it10249PPit ?10250SENT? [MR. LOEB]10251LOC[MR. LOEB] Because10252INbecause this10253DTthis Court10254NPCourt has10255VHZhave long10256RBlong held10257VVNhold that10258IN/thatthat when10259WRBwhen Congress10260NPCongress reenacts10261VVZreenact a10262DTa statute10263NNstatute or10264CCor revises10265VVZrevise a10266DTa statute10267NNstatute that10268WDTthat 's10269VBZbe subject10270JJsubject to10271TOto a10272DTa uniform10273JJuniform judicial10274JJjudicial construction10275NNconstruction ,10276,, that10277WDTthat you10278PPyou presume10279VVPpresume that10280IN/thatthat Congress10281NPCongress understands10282VVZunderstand and10283CCand knows10284VVZknow that10285DTthat construction10286NNconstruction ,10287,, has10288VHZhave adopted10289VVNadopt it10290PPit in10291INin its10292PP$its ...10293:... in10294INin its10295PP$its ratification10296NNratification ,10297,, in10298INin its10299PP$its ...10300:... in10301INin its10302PP$its amendment10303NNamendment to10304TOto the10305DTthe statute10306NNstatute .10307SENT. But10308CCbut here10309RBhere you10310PPyou have10311VHPhave ...10312:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]10313LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] The10314DTthe construction10315NNconstruction was10316VBDbe changed10317VVNchange in10318INin critical10319JJcritical mass10320NNmass in10321INin some10322DTsome significant10323JJsignificant respect10324NNrespect ,10325,, correct10326JJcorrect ?10327SENT? [MR. LOEB]10328LOC[MR. LOEB] Not10329RBnot correct10330JJcorrect ,10331,, Your10332PP$your Honor10333NPHonor .10334SENT. So10335INso critical10336JJcritical mass10337NNmass was10338VBDbe just10339RBjust an10340DTan application10341NNapplication of10342INof prong10343NNprong one10344CDone .10345SENT. So10346INso prong10347NNprong one10348PPone says10349VVZsay ,10350,, look10351VVlook ,10352,, if10353INif ...10354:... as10355INas to10356TOto whether10357INwhether disclosing10358VVGdisclose the10359DTthe information10360NNinformation will10361MDwill harm10362VVharm the10363DTthe government10364NNgovernment from10365INfrom ,10366,, in10367INin the10368DTthe future10369NNfuture ,10370,, being10371VBGbe able10372JJable to10373TOto get10374VVget information10375NNinformation ,10376,, the10377DTthe D10378NPD .10379SENT. C10380LSc .10381SENT. Circuit10382NNcircuit ,10383,, applying10384VVGapply prong10385NNprong one10386CDone ,10387,, came10388VVDcome up10389RPup with10390INwith its10391PP$its voluntary10392NNvoluntary /10393SYM/ involuntarily10394RBinvoluntarily test10395NNtest ,10396,, which10397WDTwhich has10398VHZhave n't10399RBn't been10400VBNbe followed10401VVNfollow by10402INby all10403PDTall the10404DTthe circuits10405NNScircuit ,10406,, but10407CCbut that10408DTthat 's10409VBZbe just10410RBjust an10411DTan application10412NNapplication of10413INof prong10414NNprong one10415CDone .10416SENT. We10417PPwe 're10418VBPbe saying10419VVGsay what10420WPwhat has10421VHZhave been10422VBNbe uniformly10423RBuniformly adopted10424VVNadopt ,10425,, at10426INat least10427JJSleast since10428INsince 200110429CD@card@ ,10430,, is10431VBZbe the10432DTthe two-prong10433NNtwo-prong test10434NNtest .10435SENT. One10436PPone is10437VBZbe to10438TOto that10439DTthat first10440JJfirst prong10441NNprong as10442RBas to10443TOto harm10444VVharm to10445TOto the10446DTthe government10447NNgovernment ,10448,, and10449CCand the10450DTthe second10451JJsecond prong10452NNprong is10453VBZbe the10454DTthe competitive10455JJcompetitive injury10456NNinjury .10457SENT. So10458RBso Congress10459NPCongress has10460VHZhave been10461VBNbe well10462RBwell aware10463JJaware of10464INof that10465DTthat test10466NNtest ,10467,, they10468PPthey had10469VHDhave hearings10470NNShearing about10471INabout it10472PPit ,10473,, sought10474VVNseek proposals10475NNSproposal .10476SENT. And10477CCand did10478VVDdo they10479PPthey change10480VVchange the10481DTthe statute10482NNstatute ?10483SENT? That10484DTthat would10485MDwould be10486VBbe judicial10487JJjudicial acquiescence10488NNacquiescence we10489PPwe 're10490VBPbe not10491RBnot relying10492VVGrely on10493INon .10494SENT. Instead10495RBinstead ,10496,, they10497PPthey actually10498RBactually amended10499VVDamend again10500RBagain and10501CCand again10502RBagain ,10503,, passed10504VVDpass statute10505NNstatute after10506INafter statute10507NNstatute ,10508,, statutes10509NNSstatute since10510INsince 200110511CD@card@ ,10512,, taking10513VVGtake the10514DTthe exact10515JJexact verbatim10516JJverbatim language10517NNlanguage of10518INof the10519DTthe statute10520NNstatute and10521CCand a10522DTa reference10523NNreference to10524TOto Exemption10525NPExemption 410526CD4 and10527CCand saying10528VVGsay how10529WRBhow it10530PPit applies10531VVZapply to10532TOto different10533JJdifferent circumstances10534NNScircumstance .10535SENT. Again10536RBagain ,10537,, those10538DTthose could10539MDcould ...10540:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]10541LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] That10542DTthat would10543MDwould stop10544VVstop this10545DTthis Court10546NPCourt from10547INfrom saying10548VVGsay ...10549:... this10550DTthis Court10551NPCourt has10552VHZhave never10553RBnever ...10554:... has10555VHZhave never10556RBnever answered10557VVNanswer that10558DTthat question10559NNquestion .10560SENT. And10561CCand you10562PPyou 're10563VBPbe ...10564:... you10565PPyou 're10566VBPbe saying10567VVGsay that10568IN/thatthat the10569DTthe D10570NPD .10571SENT. C10572LSc .10573SENT. Circuit10574NNcircuit decision10575NNdecision and10576CCand then10577RBthen other10578JJother measures10579NNSmeasure using10580VVGuse the10581DTthe same10582JJsame language10583NNlanguage stops10584VVZstop this10585DTthis Court10586NPCourt from10587INfrom saying10588VVGsay what10589WPwhat the10590DTthe words10591NNSword of10592INof Exemption10593NPExemption 410594CD4 mean10595NNmean ?10596SENT? [MR. LOEB]10597LOC[MR. LOEB] No10598NPNo ,10599,, Your10600PP$your Honor10601NPHonor ,10602,, it10603PPit does10604VVZdo n't10605RBn't stop10606VVstop this10607DTthis Court10608NPCourt .10609SENT. But10610CCbut this10611DTthis Court10612NPCourt has10613VHZhave been10614VBNbe deferential10615JJdeferential to10616TOto Congress10617NPCongress when10618WRBwhen it10619PPit ...10620:... when10621WRBwhen it10622PPit looks10623VVZlook to10624TOto ...10625:... when10626WRBwhen it10627PPit reenacts10628VVZreenact a10629DTa statute10630NNstatute and10631CCand there10632EXthere is10633VBZbe a10634DTa uniform10635JJuniform construction10636NNconstruction ,10637,, as10638INas there10639EXthere was10640VBDbe here10641RBhere in10642INin eight10643CDeight ,10644,, nine10645CDnine different10646JJdifferent uniform10647JJuniform circuits10648NNScircuit about10649INabout the10650DTthe two-prong10651NNtwo-prong test10652NNtest ,10653,, that10654WDTthat you10655PPyou know10656VVPknow Congress10657NPCongress knows10658VVZknow about10659INabout it10660PPit ,10661,, it10662PPit is10663VBZbe ...10664:... it10665PPit is10666VBZbe now10667RBnow reenacting10668VVGreenact the10669DTthe statute10670NNstatute ,10671,, and10672CCand that10673DTthat 's10674VBZbe what10675WPwhat this10676DTthis Court10677NPCourt said10678VVDsay this10679DTthis term10680NNterm in10681INin Helsinn10682NPHelsinn .10683SENT. There10684EXthere was10685VBDbe an10686DTan appellate10687JJappellate decision10688NNdecision .10689SENT. And10690CCand it10691PPit was10692VBDbe they10693PPthey took10694VVDtake ...10695:... they10696PPthey ...10697:... they10698PPthey reenacted10699VVDreenact that10700IN/thatthat same10701JJsame language10702NNlanguage and10703CCand put10704VVput it10705PPit into10706INinto the10707DTthe American10708NPAmerican Invents10709VVZinvent Act10710NPAct ,10711,, right10712RBright ,10713,, and10714CCand this10715DTthis Court10716NPCourt said10717VVDsay that10718IN/thatthat Congress10719NPCongress is10720VBZbe presumed10721VVNpresume to10722TOto know10723VVknow the10724DTthe prior10725JJprior judicial10726JJjudicial construction10727NNconstruction and10728CCand is10729VBZbe assumed10730VVNassume to10731TOto have10732VHhave adopted10733VVNadopt it10734PPit .10735SENT. So10736RBso we10737PPwe 're10738VBPbe not10739RBnot saying10740VVGsay you10741PPyou 're10742VBPbe in10743INin any10744DTany way10745NNway barred10746VVNbar from10747INfrom doing10748VVGdo it10749PPit ,10750,, but10751CCbut that10752DTthat 's10753VBZbe a10754DTa significant10755JJsignificant factor10756NNfactor .10757SENT. When10758WRBwhen this10759DTthis Court10760NPCourt has10761VHZhave found10762VVNfind that10763DTthat ratification10764NNratification theory10765NNtheory applies10766VVZapply ,10767,, it10768PPit has10769VHZhave n't10770RBn't even10771RBeven gone10772VVNgo on10773RPon to10774TOto sort10775VVsort of10776INof look10777NNlook anew10778RBanew at10779INat the10780DTthe statute10781NNstatute because10782INbecause it10783PPit ...10784:... it10785PPit looks10786VVZlook ...10787:... it10788PPit recognizes10789VVZrecognize that10790IN/thatthat Congress10791NPCongress knows10792VVZknow about10793INabout the10794DTthe prevailing10795JJprevailing view10796NNview and10797CCand has10798VHZhave adopted10799VVNadopt it10800PPit by10801INby amending10802VVGamend the10803DTthe statute10804NNstatute and10805CCand not10806RBnot changing10807VVGchange it10808PPit or10809CCor ...10810:... or10811CCor not10812RBnot changing10813VVGchange it10814PPit in10815INin the10816DTthe relevant10817JJrelevant sense10818NNsense here10819RBhere .10820SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]10821LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Does10822VVZdo that10823DTthat ...10824:... does10825VVZdo that10826DTthat argument10827NNargument depend10828VVdepend upon10829RPupon how10830WRBhow plausible10831JJplausible this10832DTthis interpretation10833NNinterpretation would10834MDwould be10835VBbe as10836INas a10837DTa matter10838NNmatter of10839INof first10840JJfirst impression10841NNimpression ?10842SENT? [MR. LOEB]10843LOC[MR. LOEB] Justice10844NPJustice Alito10845NPAlito ,10846,, I10847PPI ...10848:... I10849PPI do10850VVPdo n't10851RBn't think10852VVthink that10853IN/thatthat that10854DTthat ...10855:... that10856WDTthat is10857VBZbe part10858NNpart of10859INof the10860DTthe calculus10861NNcalculus .10862SENT. This10863DTthis Court10864NPCourt has10865VHZhave ...10866:... has10867VHZhave said10868VVNsay ,10869,, has10870VHZhave there10871RBthere been10872VBNbe a10873DTa uniform10874JJuniform construction10875NNconstruction ,10876,, you10877PPyou know10878VVPknow ,10879,, and10880CCand they10881PPthey presume10882VVPpresume Congress10883NPCongress is10884VBZbe aware10885JJaware .10886SENT. Here10887RBhere ,10888,, we10889PPwe know10890VVPknow Congress10891NPCongress was10892VBDbe aware10893JJaware of10894INof it10895PPit .10896SENT. And10897CCand here10898RBhere we10899PPwe do10900VVPdo n't10901RBn't ...10902:... we10903PPwe have10904VHPhave Congress10905NPCongress enacting10906VVGenact 2910907CD@card@ different10908JJdifferent statutes10909NNSstatute knowing10910VVGknow about10911INabout the10912DTthe uniform10913JJuniform construction10914NNconstruction since10915INsince 200110916CD@card@ .10917SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]10918LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] So10919RBso ,10920,, I10921PPI mean10922VVPmean ,10923,, if10924INif there10925EXthere were10926VBDbe a10927DTa statute10928NNstatute that10929WDTthat says10930VVZsay something10931NNsomething has10932VHZhave to10933TOto be10934VBbe done10935VVNdo within10936INwithin 3010937CD@card@ days10938NNSday ,10939,, and10940CCand a10941DTa court10942NNcourt said10943VVDsay 3010944CD@card@ really10945RBreally means10946VVZmean 5010947CD@card@ ,10948,, and10949CCand all10950PDTall the10951DTthe other10952JJother courts10953NNScourt fell10954VVDfall in10955INin line10956NNline ,10957,, we10958PPwe would10959MDwould say10960VVsay ,10961,, all10962DTall right10963NNright ,10964,, that10965WDTthat Congress10966NPCongress has10967VHZhave ...10968:... and10969CCand Congress10970NPCongress enacts10971VVZenact statutes10972NNSstatute related10973VVNrelate to10974TOto that10975DTthat ...10976:... we10977PPwe would10978MDwould say10979VVsay ,10980,, well10981RBwell ,10982,, Congress10983NPCongress has10984VHZhave implicitly10985RBimplicitly ratified10986VVNratify that10987DTthat ?10988SENT? [MR. LOEB]10989LOC[MR. LOEB] Obviously10990RBobviously ,10991,, that10992WDTthat 's10993VBZbe a10994DTa hard10995RBhard hypothetical10996JJhypothetical ,10997,, Your10998PP$your Honor10999NPHonor ,11000,, but11001CCbut I11002PPI would11003MDwould say11004VVsay yes11005UHyes ,11006,, that11007WDTthat ...11008:... that11009IN/thatthat even11010RBeven in11011INin that11012DTthat context11013NNcontext ,11014,, that11015IN/thatthat Congress11016NPCongress was11017VBDbe aware11018JJaware of11019INof the11020DTthe construction11021NNconstruction of11022INof that11023DTthat term11024NNterm ,11025,, even11026RBeven how11027WRBhow bizarre11028JJbizarre it11029PPit may11030MDmay be11031VBbe .11032SENT. Here11033RBhere ,11034,, we11035PPwe do11036VVPdo n't11037RBn't have11038VHhave such11039PDTsuch a11040DTa bizarre11041JJbizarre ,11042,, you11043PPyou know11044VVPknow ,11045,, construction11046NNconstruction .11047SENT. We11048PPwe have11049VHPhave the11050DTthe Congress11051NPCongress adopting11052VVGadopt the11053DTthe common11054JJcommon law11055NNlaw construction11056NNconstruction .11057SENT. But11058CCbut this11059DTthis Court11060NPCourt has11061VHZhave said11062VVNsay in11063INin Lorillard11064NPLorillard ,11065,, in11066INin Shapiro11067NPShapiro ,11068,, in11069INin Helsinn11070NPHelsinn ,11071,, again11072RBagain and11073CCand again11074RBagain ,11075,, that11076IN/thatthat when11077WRBwhen you11078PPyou take11079VVPtake language11080NNlanguage from11081INfrom one11082CDone spot11083NNspot and11084CCand you11085PPyou put11086VVPput it11087PPit into11088INinto another11089DTanother ,11090,, reenact11091VVreenact it11092PPit ,11093,, it11094PPit contains11095VVZcontain the11096DTthe same11097JJsame meaning11098NNmeaning as11099RBas ...11100:... as11101RBas ...11102:... [JUSTICE ALITO]11103LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well11104UHWell ,11105,, under11106INunder the11107DTthe common11108JJcommon law11109NNlaw ,11110,, was11111VBDbe competitive11112JJcompetitive harm11113NNharm part11114NNpart of11115INof the11116DTthe claim11117NNclaim itself11118PPitself ,11119,, or11120CCor was11121VBDbe it11122PPit simply11123RBsimply what11124WPwhat you11125PPyou needed11126VVDneed to11127TOto show11128VVshow to11129TOto get11130VVget damages11131NNSdamage ?11132SENT? [MR. LOEB]11133LOC[MR. LOEB] For11134INfor trade11135NNtrade secrets11136NNSsecret ,11137,, it11138PPit was11139VBDbe ,11140,, in11141INin essence11142NNessence ,11143,, a11144DTa definition11145NNdefinition of11146INof what11147WPwhat a11148DTa trade11149NNtrade secret11150NNsecret is11151VBZbe ,11152,, something11153NNsomething that11154WDTthat ,11155,, when11156WRBwhen it11157PPit 's11158VBZbe released11159VVNrelease ,11160,, will11161MDwill cause11162VVcause competitive11163JJcompetitive harm11164NNharm .11165SENT. And11166CCand the11167DTthe restatement11168NNrestatement said11169VVDsay it11170PPit was11171VBDbe treating11172VVGtreat this11173DTthis ...11174:... [JUSTICE ALITO]11175LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well11176UHWell ,11177,, for11178INfor things11179NNSthing that11180WDTthat are11181VBPbe not11182RBnot trade11183NNtrade secrets11184NNSsecret ,11185,, confidential11186JJconfidential financial11187JJfinancial information11188NNinformation that11189WDTthat is11190VBZbe not11191RBnot a11192DTa trade11193NNtrade secret11194NNsecret .11195SENT. [MR. LOEB]11196LOC[MR. LOEB] The11197DTthe courts11198NNScourt treated11199VVDtreat that11200IN/thatthat same11201JJsame confidential11202JJconfidential business11203NNbusiness information11204NNinformation in11205INin the11206DTthe same11207JJsame respect11208NNrespect ,11209,, that11210WDTthat you11211PPyou had11212VHDhave to11213TOto show11214VVshow a11215DTa competitive11216JJcompetitive harm11217NNharm .11218SENT. It11219PPit was11220VBDbe n't11221RBn't just11222RBjust injury11223NNinjury ,11224,, because11225INbecause you11226PPyou could11227MDcould show11228VVshow injury11229NNinjury in11230INin lots11231NNSlot of11232INof different11233JJdifferent ways11234NNSway ,11235,, but11236CCbut you11237PPyou would11238MDwould have11239VHhave to11240TOto show11241VVshow actually11242RBactually a11243DTa competitive11244JJcompetitive injury11245NNinjury in11246INin the11247DTthe case11248NNcase .11249SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]11250LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Is11251VBZbe ...11252:... is11253VBZbe there11254RBthere a11255DTa difference11256NNdifference ,11257,, Mr11258NPMr .11259SENT. Loeb11260NPLoeb ,11261,, for11262INfor purposes11263NNSpurpose of11264INof this11265DTthis congressional11266JJcongressional ratification11267NNratification argument11268NNargument that11269IN/thatthat the11270DTthe court11271NNcourt at11272INat issue11273NNissue was11274VBDbe not11275RBnot the11276DTthe Supreme11277NPSupreme Court11278NPCourt ,11279,, that11280WDTthat it11281PPit was11282VBDbe instead11283RBinstead a11284DTa circuit11285NNcircuit court11286NNcourt ?11287SENT? [MR. LOEB]11288LOC[MR. LOEB] It11289PPit ...11290:... what11291WPwhat this11292DTthis Court11293NPCourt has11294VHZhave said11295VVNsay is11296VBZbe if11297INif there11298EXthere 's11299VBZbe a11300DTa ...11301:... a11302DTa uniform11303JJuniform judicial11304JJjudicial construction11305NNconstruction .11306SENT. That11307DTthat can11308MDcan come11309VVcome ,11310,, of11311INof course11312NNcourse ,11313,, from11314INfrom the11315DTthe Supreme11316NPSupreme Court11317NPCourt .11318SENT. And11319CCand then11320RBthen ,11321,, if11322INif they11323PPthey take11324VVPtake the11325DTthe language11326NNlanguage and11327CCand reenact11328VVreenact it11329PPit or11330CCor ...11331:... or11332CCor put11333VVput it11334PPit from11335INfrom this11336DTthis statute11337NNstatute to11338TOto that11339DTthat statute11340NNstatute ,11341,, you11342PPyou would11343MDwould presume11344VVpresume that11345IN/thatthat they11346PPthey know11347VVPknow the11348DTthe Supreme11349NPSupreme Court11350NPCourt construction11351NNconstruction .11352SENT. But11353CCbut the11354DTthe language11355NNlanguage of11356INof Lorillard11357NPLorillard and11358CCand Shapiro11359NPShapiro and11360CCand Helsinn11361NPHelsinn just11362RBjust talk11363VVtalk about11364INabout a11365DTa uniform11366JJuniform judicial11367JJjudicial construction11368NNconstruction .11369SENT. And11370CCand we11371PPwe know11372VVPknow from11373INfrom Helsinn11374NPHelsinn we11375PPwe had11376VHDhave just11377RBjust the11378DTthe Federal11379NPFederal Circuit11380NPCircuit construing11381VVGconstrue the11382DTthe prior11383JJprior iteration11384NNiteration ,11385,, which11386WDTwhich was11387VBDbe then11388RBthen lifted11389VVNlift into11390INinto the11391DTthe American11392NPAmerican Invents11393VVZinvent Act11394NPAct .11395SENT. So11396INso that11397DTthat principle11398NNprinciple is11399VBZbe one11400CDone really11401RBreally ,11402,, does11403VVZdo Congress11404NPCongress know11405VVknow of11406INof that11407DTthat uniform11408JJuniform construction11409NNconstruction ,11410,, and11411CCand did11412VVDdo it11413PPit do11414VVPdo anything11415NNanything about11416INabout it11417PPit ?11418SENT? And11419CCand here11420RBhere we11421PPwe did11422VVDdo n't11423RBn't have11424VHhave them11425PPthem just11426RBjust reenact11427VVPreenact something11428NNsomething once11429RBonce or11430CCor amend11431VVamend the11432DTthe statute11433NNstatute once11434RBonce ,11435,, but11436CCbut some11437DTsome ...11438:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]11439LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] So11440RBso ...11441:... so11442RBso ,11443,, again11444RBagain ,11445,, let11446VVlet 's11447VBZbe say11448VVsay we11449PPwe just11450RBjust had11451VHDhave district11452NNdistrict courts11453NNScourt ,11454,, but11455CCbut we11456PPwe had11457VHDhave uniform11458JJuniform district11459NNdistrict courts11460NNScourt saying11461VVGsay 3011462CD@card@ days11463NNSday means11464VVZmean 5011465CD@card@ days11466NNSday .11467SENT. That11468DTthat 's11469VBZbe absolutely11470RBabsolutely uniform11471JJuniform .11472SENT. Congress11473NPCongress thereafter11474RBthereafter says11475VVZsay 3011476CD@card@ days11477NNSday ,11478,, everybody11479NNeverybody in11480INin America11481NPAmerica should11482MDshould know11483VVknow that11484IN/thatthat that11485WDTthat really11486RBreally means11487VVZmean 5011488CD@card@ .11489SENT. The11490DTthe average11491JJaverage person11492NNperson who11493WPwho 's11494VBZbe supposed11495VVNsuppose to11496TOto have11497VHhave fair11498JJfair notice11499NNnotice of11500INof the11501DTthe statutes11502NNSstatute opens11503VVZopen up11504RPup the11505DTthe books11506NNSbook and11507CCand sees11508VVZsee 3011509CD@card@ days11510NNSday but11511CCbut ,11512,, in11513INin fact11514NNfact ,11515,, is11516VBZbe supposed11517VVNsuppose to11518TOto know11519VVknow that11520IN/thatthat it11521PPit means11522VVZmean 5011523CD@card@ because11524INbecause a11525DTa lot11526NNlot of11527INof district11528NNdistrict courts11529NNScourt have11530VHPhave said11531VVNsay so11532RBso ?11533SENT? [MR. LOEB]11534LOC[MR. LOEB] Well11535UHwell ,11536,, I11537PPI do11538VVPdo n't11539RBn't think11540VVthink we11541PPwe would11542MDwould be11543VBbe ...11544:... this11545DTthis Court11546NNcourt or11547CCor ...11548:... or11549CCor ...11550:... we11551PPwe 're11552VBPbe arguing11553VVGargue that11554DTthat ...11555:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]11556LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Is11557VBZbe that11558IN/thatthat consistent11559JJconsistent with11560INwith fair11561JJfair notice11562NNnotice or11563CCor due11564JJdue process11565NNprocess or11566CCor any11567DTany normal11568JJnormal statutory11569JJstatutory interpretation11570NNinterpretation methodology11571NNmethodology you11572PPyou 're11573VBPbe familiar11574JJfamiliar with11575INwith ?11576SENT? [MR. LOEB]11577LOC[MR. LOEB] In11578INin this11579DTthis particular11580JJparticular case11581NNcase ,11582,, there11583EXthere 's11584VBZbe not11585RBnot this11586DTthis sort11587NNsort of11588INof stark11589RBstark it11590PPit says11591VVZsay 3011592CD@card@ and11593CCand we11594PPwe 're11595VBPbe reading11596VVGread it11597PPit to11598TOto be11599VBbe 5011600CD@card@ .11601SENT. And11602CCand maybe11603RBmaybe that11604WDTthat 's11605VBZbe sort11606NNsort of11607INof an11608DTan outlier11609NNoutlier situation11610NNsituation where11611WRBwhere you11612PPyou would11613MDwould have11614VHhave an11615DTan exception11616NNexception like11617INlike Lorillard11618NPLorillard .11619SENT. [JUSTICE GORSUCH]11620LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Exception11621NNexception for11622INfor maybe11623RBmaybe due11624JJdue process11625NNprocess and11626CCand fair11627JJfair notice11628NNnotice ?11629SENT? [MR. LOEB]11630LOC[MR. LOEB] Well11631UHWell ,11632,, no11633DTno one11634CDone can11635MDcan argue11636VVargue that11637IN/thatthat adopting11638VVGadopt the11639DTthe common11640JJcommon law11641NNlaw meaning11642NNmeaning of11643INof trade11644NNtrade secrets11645NNSsecret and11646CCand business11647NNbusiness information11648NNinformation is11649VBZbe a11650DTa violation11651NNviolation of11652INof due11653JJdue process11654NNprocess .11655SENT. And11656CCand the11657DTthe way11658NNway that11659IN/thatthat you11660PPyou 're11661VBPbe saying11662VVGsay days11663NNSday versus11664CCversus 5011665CD@card@ days11666NNSday ,11667,, I11668PPI 'll11669MDwill give11670VVgive you11671PPyou that11672DTthat .11673SENT. That11674DTthat 's11675VBZbe a11676DTa much11677RBmuch harder11678JJRhard case11679NNcase and11680CCand ...11681:... and11682CCand maybe11683RBmaybe ...11684:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]11685LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] Very11686JJVery kind11687NNkind of11688INof you11689PPyou .11690SENT. Thank11691VVthank you11692PPyou .11693SENT. [11694SYM[ LAUGHTER11695NNlaughter ]11696SYM] [JUSTICE GORSUCH]11697LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] But11698CCbut ...11699:... but11700RBbut ...11701:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11702LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well11703UHWell ,11704,, but11705CCbut ...11706:... [JUSTICE GORSUCH]11707LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH] ...11708:... do11709VVdo n't11710RBn't our11711PP$our ...11712:... do11713VVdo n't11714RBn't our11715PP$our tools11716NNStool of11717INof interpretation11718NNinterpretation normally11719RBnormally take11720VVtake their11721PP$their cue11722NNcue from11723INfrom things11724NNSthing like11725INlike due11726JJdue process11727NNprocess and11728CCand fair11729JJfair notice11730NNnotice ,11731,, rather11732RBrather than11733INthan the11734DTthe other11735JJother way11736NNway around11737RBaround ,11738,, where11739WRBwhere due11740JJdue process11741NNprocess and11742CCand fair11743JJfair notice11744NNnotice have11745VHPhave to11746TOto become11747VVbecome the11748DTthe exception11749NNexception to11750TOto our11751PP$our statutory11752JJstatutory interpretation11753NNinterpretation tools11754NNStool ?11755SENT? [MR. LOEB]11756LOC[MR. LOEB] But11757CCbut it11758PPit is11759VBZbe an11760DTan established11761JJestablished statutory11762JJstatutory interpretation11763NNinterpretation mechanism11764NNmechanism that11765IN/thatthat when11766WRBwhen Congress11767NPCongress reenacts11768VVZreenact a11769DTa statute11770NNstatute and11771CCand there11772EXthere 's11773VBZbe a11774DTa uniform11775JJuniform construction11776NNconstruction ,11777,, even11778RBeven if11779INif it11780PPit 's11781VBZbe a11782DTa uniform11783JJuniform circuit11784NNcircuit construction11785NNconstruction ,11786,, that11787WDTthat you11788PPyou presume11789VVPpresume that11790IN/thatthat Congress11791NPCongress has11792VHZhave adopted11793VVNadopt that11794IN/thatthat prior11795JJprior judicial11796JJjudicial construction11797NNconstruction .11798SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11799LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] So11800INso how11801WRBhow many11802JJmany ...11803:... how11804WRBhow many11805JJmany courts11806NNScourt of11807INof appeals11808NNSappeal do11809VVPdo you11810PPyou have11811VHPhave to11812TOto take11813VVtake ...11814:... I11815PPI assume11816VVPassume uniform11817NNuniform is11818VBZbe n't11819RBn't enough11820JJenough ...11821:... if11822INif there11823EXthere are11824VBPbe just11825RBjust two11826CDtwo ,11827,, that11828WDTthat 's11829VBZbe uniform11830JJuniform ,11831,, but11832CCbut you11833PPyou have11834VHPhave ...11835:... I11836PPI understand11837VVPunderstand you11838PPyou ...11839:... you11840PPyou think11841VVPthink you11842PPyou have11843VHPhave eight11844CDeight ,11845,, right11846RBright ?11847SENT? [MR. LOEB]11848LOC[MR. LOEB] At11849INat least11850JJSleast eight11851CDeight ,11852,, Your11853PP$your Honor11854NPHonor .11855SENT. And11856CCand there11857EXthere 's11858VBZbe no11859DTno ...11860:... and11861CCand no11862DTno outlier11863NNoutlier circuits11864NNScircuit on11865INon the11866DTthe two-prong11867NNtwo-prong test11868NNtest .11869SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]11870LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Is11871VBZbe it11872PPit that11873IN/thatthat ,11874,, or11875CCor are11876VBPbe you11877PPyou really11878RBreally relying11879VVGrely on11880INon the11881DTthe D11882NPD .11883SENT. C11884LSc .11885SENT. Circu11886NPCircu it11887PPit 's11888VBZbe special11889JJspecial situation11890NNsituation with11891INwith respect11892NNrespect to11893TOto FOIA11894NPFOIA ?11895SENT? [MR. LOEB]11896LOC[MR. LOEB] With11897INwith all11898DTall deference11899NNdeference to11900TOto the11901DTthe D11902NPD .11903SENT. C11904LSc .11905SENT. Circuit11906NNcircuit ,11907,, no11908RBno ,11909,, there11910EXthere 's11911VBZbe no11912DTno special11913JJspecial deference11914NNdeference here11915RBhere .11916SENT. We11917PPwe 're11918VBPbe looking11919VVGlook for11920INfor whether11921INwhether there11922EXthere is11923VBZbe a11924DTa judicial11925JJjudicial construction11926NNconstruction in11927INin the11928DTthe terms11929NNSterm of11930INof Helsinn11931NPHelsinn and11932CCand the11933DTthe terms11934NNSterm of11935INof Lorillard11936NPLorillard .11937SENT. And11938CCand I11939PPI think11940VVPthink ,11941,, when11942WRBwhen you11943PPyou have11944VHPhave a11945DTa overwhelming11946JJoverwhelming number11947NNnumber of11948INof the11949DTthe circuits11950NNScircuit who11951WPwho have11952VHPhave uniformly11953RBuniformly addressed11954VVNaddress it11955PPit without11956INwithout any11957DTany dissenting11958JJdissenting circuits11959NNScircuit ,11960,, that11961IN/thatthat whatever11962WDTwhatever that11963DTthat standard11964NNstandard means11965VVZmean ,11966,, that11967IN/thatthat it11968PPit 's11969VBZbe ...11970:... it11971PPit 's11972VBZbe met11973VVNmeet in11974INin that11975DTthat ...11976:... in11977INin this11978DTthis circumstance11979NNcircumstance .11980SENT. It11981PPit 's11982VBZbe really11983RBreally quite11984RBquite ...11985:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11986LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank11987VVthank you11988PPyou ,11989,, Mr11990NPMr .11991SENT. Young11992NPYoung ...11993:... I11994PPI 'm11995VBPbe sorry11996JJsorry ,11997,, Mr11998NPMr .11999SENT. Loeb12000NPLoeb .12001SENT. Now12002RBnow ,12003,, Mr12004NPMr .12005SENT. Young12006JJyoung ,12007,, you12008PPyou have12009VHPhave five12010CDfive minutes12011NNSminute remaining12012VVGremain .12013SENT.

[MR. YOUNG]12014LOC[MR. YOUNG] Thank12015VVthank you12016PPyou ,12017,, Mr12018NPMr .12019SENT. Chief12020NPChief Justice12021NPJustice .12022SENT. Just12023RBjust a12024DTa few12025JJfew points12026NNSpoint I12027PPI 'd12028MDwould like12029VVlike to12030TOto make12031VVmake .12032SENT. First12033RBfirst ,12034,, to12035TOto start12036VVstart with12037INwith what12038WPwhat "12039``" confidential12040JJconfidential "12041''" means12042NNSmean and12043CCand its12044PP$its relationship12045NNrelationship to12046TOto any12047DTany concept12048NNconcept of12049INof harm12050NNharm .12051SENT. That12052DTthat question12053NNquestion of12054INof harm12055NNharm asks12056VVZask a12057DTa very12058RBvery different12059JJdifferent question12060NNquestion .12061SENT. It12062PPit asks12063VVZask why12064WRBwhy someone12065NNsomeone keeps12066VVZkeep something12067NNsomething secret12068NNsecret ,12069,, not12070RBnot whether12071INwhether they12072PPthey keep12073VVPkeep it12074PPit secret12075JJsecret .12076SENT. There12077EXthere is12078VBZbe no12079DTno common12080JJcommon law12081NNlaw term12082NNterm of12083INof art12084NNart called12085VVDcall confidential12086JJconfidential business12087NNbusiness information12088NNinformation or12089CCor confidential12090JJconfidential commercial12091JJcommercial information12092NNinformation .12093SENT. It12094PPit 's12095VBZbe not12096RBnot ...12097:... that12098WDTthat does12099VVZdo not12100RBnot appear12101VVappear in12102INin the12103DTthe restatement12104NNrestatement .12105SENT. It12106PPit does12107VVZdo n't12108RBn't appear12109VVappear in12110INin the12111DTthe cases12112NNScase that12113WDTthat are12114VBPbe cited12115VVNcite .12116SENT. It12117PPit does12118VVZdo n't12119RBn't appear12120VVappear in12121INin any12122DTany scholarship12123NNscholarship .12124SENT. And12125CCand it12126PPit was12127VBDbe n't12128RBn't something12129NNsomething that12130IN/thatthat either12131DTeither National12132NPNational Parks12133NPParks or12134CCor any12135DTany other12136JJother case12137NNcase before12138INbefore or12139CCor after12140INafter it12141PPit relied12142VVDrely on12143RPon to12144TOto find12145VVfind some12146DTsome common12147JJcommon law12148NNlaw heritage12149NNheritage .12150SENT. It12151PPit 's12152VBZbe true12153JJtrue ,12154,, of12155INof course12156NNcourse ,12157,, that12158IN/thatthat when12159WRBwhen one12160PPone has12161VHZhave a12162DTa tort12163NNtort action12164NNaction ,12165,, any12166DTany kind12167NNkind of12168INof tort12169NNtort action12170NNaction ,12171,, harm12172NNharm will12173MDwill be12174VBbe something12175NNsomething that12176WDTthat has12177VHZhave to12178TOto be12179VBbe shown12180VVNshow ,12181,, but12182CCbut that12183WDTthat does12184VVZdo not12185RBnot infuse12186VVinfuse harm12187NNharm into12188INinto the12189DTthe very12190JJvery meaning12191NNmeaning of12192INof other12193JJother elements12194NNSelement of12195INof the12196DTthe tort12197NNtort .12198SENT. We12199PPwe know12200VVPknow that12201IN/thatthat from12202INfrom cases12203NNScase like12204INlike Carter12205NPCarter and12206CCand Bruesewitz12207NPBruesewitz that12208IN/thatthat even12209RBeven if12210INif there12211EXthere were12212VBDbe some12213DTsome common12214JJcommon law12215NNlaw conception12216NNconception ,12217,, it12218PPit is12219VBZbe n't12220RBn't enough12221JJenough for12222INfor Congress12223NPCongress to12224TOto refer12225VVrefer to12226TOto some12227DTsome vague12228JJvague principle12229NNprinciple .12230SENT. It12231PPit would12232MDwould actually12233RBactually have12234VHhave to12235TOto use12236VVuse that12237DTthat term12238NNterm of12239INof art12240NNart .12241SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12242LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Counsel12243NPCounsel ,12244,, that12245WDTthat ...12246:... that12247WDTthat begs12248VVZbeg a12249DTa question12250NNquestion ,12251,, which12252WDTwhich is12253VBZbe we12254PPwe sort12255VVPsort of12256INof naturally12257RBnaturally think12258VVPthink that12259IN/thatthat if12260INif people12261NNSpeople are12262VBPbe going12263VVGgo to12264TOto keep12265VVkeep something12266NNsomething confidential12267JJconfidential ,12268,, that12269IN/thatthat there12270EXthere 's12271VBZbe a12272DTa reason12273NNreason for12274INfor it12275PPit .12276SENT. You12277PPyou do12278VVPdo n't12279RBn't just12280RBjust say12281VVPsay ,12282,, I12283PPI do12284VVPdo n't12285RBn't want12286VVwant to12287TOto disclose12288VVdisclose because12289INbecause I12290PPI do12291VVPdo n't12292RBn't feel12293VVfeel like12294INlike it12295PPit ,12296,, although12297INalthough some12298DTsome people12299NNSpeople do12300VVPdo .12301SENT. It12302PPit seems12303VVZseem to12304TOto me12305PPme that12306IN/thatthat this12307DTthis concept12308NNconcept that12309IN/thatthat there12310EXthere has12311VHZhave to12312TOto be12313VBbe a12314DTa reason12315NNreason for12316INfor it12317PPit and12318CCand that12319IN/thatthat it12320PPit has12321VHZhave to12322TOto be12323VBbe tied12324VVNtie to12325TOto business12326NNbusiness and12327CCand to12328TOto commercial12329JJcommercial and12330CCand financial12331JJfinancial matters12332NNSmatter ,12333,, because12334INbecause that12335WDTthat 's12336VBZbe the12337DTthe words12338NNSword ,12339,, financial12340JJfinancial and12341CCand confidential12342JJconfidential ...12343:... financial12344JJfinancial and12345CCand commercial12346JJcommercial matters12347NNSmatter ,12348,, those12349DTthose are12350VBPbe the12351DTthe words12352NNSword of12353INof the12354DTthe statute12355NNstatute ,12356,, does12357VVZdo n't12358RBn't that12359IN/thatthat naturally12360RBnaturally infuse12361VVinfuse the12362DTthe concept12363NNconcept with12364INwith some12365DTsome sense12366NNsense that12367IN/thatthat there12368EXthere 's12369VBZbe a12370DTa reason12371NNreason for12372INfor keeping12373VVGkeep it12374PPit a12375DTa secret12376NNsecret ?12377SENT? [MR. YOUNG]12378LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well12379UHwell ,12380,, I12381PPI think12382VVPthink it12383PPit 's12384VBZbe likely12385JJlikely that12386IN/thatthat there12387EXthere is12388VBZbe .12389SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12390LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] And12391CCand that12392WDTthat has12393VHZhave to12394TOto ...12395:... and12396CCand ...12397:... and12398CCand if12399INif there12400EXthere is12401VBZbe some12402DTsome sense12403NNsense of12404INof it12405PPit ,12406,, why12407WRBwhy is12408VBZbe n't12409RBn't that12410DTthat sense12411NNsense infused12412VVNinfuse with12413INwith a12414DTa concept12415NNconcept ,12416,, if12417INif I12418PPI let12419VVPlet it12420PPit out12421RPout ,12422,, it12423PPit 's12424VBZbe going12425VVGgo to12426TOto hurt12427VVhurt me12428PPme ?12429SENT? [MR. YOUNG]12430LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well12431UHWell ,12432,, again12433RBagain ,12434,, we12435PPwe think12436VVPthink ...12437:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12438LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Taking12439VVGtake aside12440RPaside the12441DTthe quantum12442NNquantum of12443INof hurt12444VVNhurt ,12445,, but12446CCbut ...12447:... [MR. YOUNG]12448LOC[MR. YOUNG] Right12449RBright .12450SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12451LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...12452:... there12453EXthere 's12454VBZbe a12455DTa reason12456NNreason I12457PPI keep12458VVPkeep it12459PPit a12460DTa secret12461NNsecret .12462SENT. [MR. YOUNG]12463LOC[MR. YOUNG] And12464CCand I12465PPI will12466MDwill address12467VVaddress that12468IN/thatthat as12469RBas well12470RBwell .12471SENT. But12472CCbut I12473PPI think12474VVPthink that12475IN/thatthat in12476INin this12477DTthis very12478JJvery case12479NNcase it12480PPit maybe12481RBmaybe is12482VBZbe a12483DTa good12484JJgood exemplar12485NNexemplar .12486SENT. Of12487INof course12488NNcourse ,12489,, our12490PP$our clients12491NNSclient are12492VBPbe n't12493RBn't paying12494VVGpay for12495INfor us12496PPus to12497TOto pursue12498VVpursue this12499DTthis to12500TOto this12501DTthis level12502NNlevel because12503INbecause they12504PPthey just12505RBjust feel12506VVPfeel like12507INlike it12508PPit .12509SENT. Of12510INof course12511NNcourse ,12512,, we12513PPwe think12514VVPthink there12515EXthere 's12516VBZbe substantial12517JJsubstantial competitive12518JJcompetitive harm12519NNharm .12520SENT. But12521CCbut the12522DTthe question12523NNquestion Congress12524NPCongress asked12525VVNask is12526VBZbe not12527RBnot for12528INfor courts12529NNScourt to12530TOto engage12531VVengage in12532INin the12533DTthe prospective12534JJprospective ,12535,, speculative12536JJspeculative assessment12537NNassessment ...12538:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12539LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] But12540CCbut that12541DTthat 's12542VBZbe not12543RBnot true12544JJtrue .12545SENT. [MR. YOUNG]12546LOC[MR. YOUNG] ...12547:... of12548INof whether12549INwhether they12550PPthey think12551VVPthink it12552PPit is12553VBZbe .12554SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12555LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] If12556INif ...12557:... if12558INif we12559PPwe read12560VVPread "12561``" confidential12562JJconfidential "12563''" as12564INas being12565VBGbe confidential12566JJconfidential in12567INin nature12568NNnature ,12569,, which12570WDTwhich is12571VBZbe part12572NNpart of12573INof your12574PP$your definition12575NNdefinition ...12576:... [MR. YOUNG]12577LOC[MR. YOUNG] It12578PPit 's12579VBZbe a12580DTa manifestation12581NNmanifestation of12582INof it12583PPit .12584SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12585LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Well12586UHwell ,12587,, it12588PPit 's12589VBZbe ...12590:... [MR. YOUNG]12591LOC[MR. YOUNG] Things12592NNSthing that12593WDTthat are12594VBPbe confidential12595JJconfidential in12596INin nature12597NNnature are12598VBPbe likely12599JJlikely to12600TOto be12601VBbe kept12602VVNkeep secret12603JJsecret .12604SENT. Of12605INof course12606NNcourse .12607SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12608LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Well12609UHWell ,12610,, that12611WDTthat 's12612VBZbe the12613DTthe point12614NNpoint ,12615,, which12616WDTwhich is12617VBZbe ...12618:... [MR. YOUNG]12619LOC[MR. YOUNG] But12620CCbut the12621DTthe founder12622NNfounder of12623INof LifeLock12624NPLifeLock put12625VVDput his12626PP$his Social12627NPSocial Security12628NPSecurity number12629NNnumber up12630RBup on12631INon billboards12632NNSbillboard all12633RBall across12634INacross the12635DTthe country12636NNcountry to12637TOto prove12638VVprove that12639IN/thatthat his12640PP$his technology12641NNtechnology was12642VBDbe so12643RBso secure12644JJsecure .12645SENT. Now12646RBnow we12647PPwe would12648MDwould n't12649RBn't think12650VVthink that12651IN/thatthat that12652DTthat is12653VBZbe confidential12654JJconfidential anymore12655RBanymore .12656SENT. It12657PPit 's12658VBZbe just12659RBjust one12660CDone manifestation12661NNmanifestation of12662INof it12663PPit .12664SENT. Everybody12665NNEverybody else12666RBelse 's12667VHZhave might12668MDmight be12669VBbe .12670SENT. And12671CCand ,12672,, here12673RBhere ,12674,, when12675WRBwhen you12676PPyou ...12677:... when12678WRBwhen you12679PPyou have12680VHPhave this12681DTthis bucket12682NNbucket in12683INin Exemption12684NPExemption 412685CD4 ,12686,, you12687PPyou start12688VVPstart with12689INwith it12690PPit being12691VBGbe commercial12692JJcommercial or12693CCor financial12694JJfinancial .12695SENT. Those12696DTthose are12697VBPbe limits12698NNSlimit .12699SENT. Of12700INof course12701NNcourse ,12702,, you12703PPyou 're12704VBPbe right12705JJright ,12706,, if12707INif you12708PPyou can12709MDcan 't12710RB't show12711NNshow that12712IN/thatthat it12713PPit 's12714VBZbe commercial12715JJcommercial or12716CCor financial12717JJfinancial information12718NNinformation ,12719,, you12720PPyou 're12721VBPbe not12722RBnot within12723INwithin Exemption12724NPExemption 412725CD4 .12726SENT. Then12727RBthen you12728PPyou have12729VHPhave to12730TOto show12731VVshow it12732PPit 's12733VBZbe obtained12734VVNobtain from12735INfrom a12736DTa person12737NNperson .12738SENT. That12739DTthat 's12740VBZbe not12741RBnot the12742DTthe government12743NNgovernment doing12744VVGdo it12745PPit ,12746,, in12747INin other12748JJother words12749NNSword .12750SENT. And12751CCand then12752RBthen ,12753,, lastly12754RBlastly ,12755,, it12756PPit has12757VHZhave to12758TOto be12759VBbe confidential12760JJconfidential or12761CCor privileged12762JJprivileged .12763SENT. And12764CCand all12765PDTall that12766DTthat Congress12767NPCongress asked12768VVDask the12769DTthe courts12770NNScourt to12771TOto do12772VVdo is12773VBZbe answer12774VVanswer the12775DTthe objective12776JJobjective question12777NNquestion :12778:: Does12779VVZdo the12780DTthe person12781NNperson whose12782WP$whose information12783NNinformation the12784DTthe government12785NNgovernment now12786RBnow has12787VHZhave ,12788,, does12789VVZdo that12790DTthat person12791NNperson keep12792VVkeep this12793DTthis secret12794JJsecret and12795CCand not12796RBnot publicly12797RBpublicly disclose12798VVdisclose it12799PPit ?12800SENT? And12801CCand ,12802,, if12803INif so12804RBso ,12805,, the12806DTthe fact12807NNfact ,12808,, of12809INof course12810NNcourse ,12811,, that12812WDTthat likely12813RBlikely the12814DTthe reason12815NNreason they12816PPthey do12817VVPdo that12818IN/thatthat in12819INin many12820JJmany instances12821NNSinstance is12822VBZbe to12823TOto protect12824VVprotect themselves12825PPthemselves from12826INfrom competitive12827JJcompetitive harm12828NNharm ,12829,, that12830WDTthat 's12831VBZbe not12832RBnot something12833NNsomething that12834IN/thatthat courts12835NNScourt need12836VVPneed to12837TOto spend12838VVspend two12839CDtwo days12840NNSday on12841INon a12842DTa trial12843NNtrial with12844INwith expert12845NNexpert witnesses12846NNSwitness and12847CCand leaders12848NNSleader from12849INfrom industry12850NNindustry and12851CCand all12852DTall different12853JJdifferent industry12854NNindustry segments12855NNSsegment coming12856VVGcome in12857INin to12858TOto try12859VVtry to12860TOto persuade12861VVpersuade a12862DTa poor12863JJpoor district12864NNdistrict judge12865NNjudge to12866TOto figure12867VVfigure out12868RPout why12869WRBwhy in12870INin the12871DTthe world12872NNworld this12873DTthis information12874NNinformation would12875MDwould cause12876VVcause a12877DTa substantial12878JJsubstantial competitive12879JJcompetitive harm12880NNharm or12881CCor not12882RBnot .12883SENT. Harm12884NNharm is12885VBZbe not12886RBnot part12887NNpart of12888INof the12889DTthe word12890NNword confidential12891JJconfidential .12892SENT. It12893PPit 's12894VBZbe often12895RBoften associated12896VVNassociate with12897INwith it12898PPit if12899INif you12900PPyou ...12901:... [JUSTICE BREYER]12902LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] But12903CCbut why12904WRBwhy not12905RBnot call12906VVcall it12907PPit harm12908VVharm ,12909,, some12910DTsome harm12911NNharm ,12912,, I12913PPI mean12914VVPmean ,12915,, some12916DTsome harm12917NNharm ,12918,, because12919INbecause Congress12920NPCongress does12921VVZdo n't12922RBn't go12923VVgo around12924INaround protecting12925VVGprotect people12926NNSpeople from12927INfrom X12928NPX where12929WRBwhere X12930NPX does12931VVZdo n't12932RBn't cause12933VVcause any12934DTany harm12935NNharm .12936SENT. That12937DTthat would12938MDwould be12939VBbe not12940RBnot there12941RBthere in12942INin the12943DTthe statute12944NNstatute ,12945,, but12946CCbut it12947PPit would12948MDwould be12949VBbe a12950DTa general12951JJgeneral assumption12952NNassumption .12953SENT. [MR. YOUNG]12954LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well12955UHWell ,12956,, Congress12957NPCongress spoke12958VVDspeak broadly12959RBbroadly ...12960:... [JUSTICE BREYER]12961LOC[JUSTICE BREYER] Do12962VVPdo you12963PPyou object12964VVPobject to12965TOto that12966DTthat ,12967,, saying12968VVGsay adding12969VVGadd to12970TOto that12971DTthat some12972DTsome harm12973NNharm ?12974SENT? [MR. YOUNG]12975LOC[MR. YOUNG] Well12976UHWell ,12977,, I12978PPI ...12979:... I12980PPI ...12981:... I12982PPI ...12983:... I12984PPI object12985VVPobject to12986TOto it12987PPit in12988INin this12989DTthis sense12990NNsense :12991:: I12992PPI think12993VVPthink that12994IN/thatthat by12995INby opening12996VVGopen that12997DTthat door12998NNdoor ,12999,, you13000PPyou now13001RBnow are13002VBPbe opening13003VVGopen trial13004NNtrial courts13005NNScourt to13006TOto have13007VHhave to13008TOto do13009VVdo the13010DTthe kind13011NNkind of13012INof tedious13013JJtedious and13014CCand laborious13015JJlaborious work13016NNwork that13017WDTthat leads13018VVZlead to13019TOto false13020JJfalse negatives13021NNSnegative like13022INlike this13023DTthis case13024NNcase .13025SENT. It13026PPit ...13027:... it13028PPit really13029RBreally is13030VBZbe amazing13031JJamazing that13032IN/thatthat something13033NNsomething like13034INlike store-level13035JJstore-level SNAP13036JJsnap redemption13037NNredemption data13038NNSdatum would13039MDwould lead13040VVlead to13041TOto a13042DTa situation13043NNsituation in13044INin which13045WDTwhich we13046PPwe had13047VHDhave to13048TOto have13049VHhave a13050DTa trial13051NNtrial at13052INat all13053DTall .13054SENT. And13055CCand you13056PPyou would13057MDwould n't13058RBn't have13059VHhave to13060TOto do13061VVdo it13062PPit ,13063,, and13064CCand people13065NNSpeople are13066VBPbe n't13067RBn't likely13068JJlikely to13069TOto press13070VVpress objections13071NNSobjection ,13072,, if13073INif they13074PPthey do13075VVPdo n't13076RBn't have13077VHhave any13078DTany harm13079NNharm that13080WDTthat 's13081VBZbe going13082VVGgo to13083TOto befall13084VVbefall them13085PPthem .13086SENT. And13087CCand so13088INso Congress13089NPCongress solved13090VVDsolve that13091DTthat problem13092NNproblem by13093INby saying13094VVGsay objectively13095RBobjectively ...13096:... if13097INif I13098PPI might13099MDmight just13100RBjust finish13101VVfinish the13102DTthe thought13103NNthought ,13104,, Mr13105NPMr .13106SENT. Chief13107NPChief Justice13108NPJustice .13109SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13110LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Sure13111NPSure .13112SENT. [MR. YOUNG]13113LOC[MR. YOUNG] Objectively13114RBobjectively ,13115,, if13116INif you13117PPyou have13118VHPhave a13119DTa pattern13120NNpattern of13121INof keeping13122VVGkeep this13123DTthis information13124NNinformation secret13125NNsecret and13126CCand not13127RBnot publicly13128RBpublicly disclosing13129VVGdisclose it13130PPit ,13131,, that13132WDTthat is13133VBZbe the13134DTthe only13135JJonly thing13136NNthing the13137DTthe federal13138JJfederal courts13139NNScourt are13140VBPbe authorized13141VVNauthorize to13142TOto ask13143VVask ,13144,, and13145CCand that13146WDTthat gives13147VVZgive the13148DTthe government13149NNgovernment the13150DTthe authority13151NNauthority to13152TOto keep13153VVkeep it13154PPit secret13155JJsecret if13156INif it13157PPit so13158RBso desires13159VVZdesire .13160SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13161LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank13162VVthank you13163PPyou ,13164,, counsel13165NNcounsel .13166SENT. The13167DTthe case13168NNcase is13169VBZbe submitted13170VVNsubmit .13171SENT.