[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We2PPwe
'll3MDwill
hear4VVhear
argument5NNargument
first6RBfirst
this7DTthis
morning8NNmorning
in9INin
Case10NPCase
18-48111CD@card@
,12,,
the13DTthe
Food14NPFood
Marketing15NPMarketing
Institute16NPInstitute
versus17CCversus
the18DTthe
Argus19NPArgus
Leader20NPLeader
...21:...
versus22CCversus
Argus23NPArgus
Leader24NPLeader
Media25NPMedia
.26SENT.
Mr27NPMr
.28SENT.
Young29NPYoung
.30SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]31LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Mr32NPMr
.33SENT.
Chief34NPChief
Justice35NPJustice
,36,,
and37CCand
may38MDmay
it39PPit
please40VVplease
the41DTthe
Court42NPCourt
:43::
Before44INbefore
I45PPI
turn46VVturn
to47TOto
why48WRBwhy
the49DTthe
Court50NPCourt
should51MDshould
jettison52VVjettison
the53DTthe
National54NPNational
Parks55NPParks
definition56NNdefinition
of57INof
"58``"
confidential59JJconfidential
"60''"
and61CCand
instead62RBinstead
restore63VVrestore
that64DTthat
word65NNword
's66POS's
plain67JJplain
meaning68NNmeaning
as69INas
used70VVNuse
in71INin
Exemption72NPExemption
473CD4
of74INof
the75DTthe
Freedom76NPFreedom
of77INof
Information78NPInformation
Act79NPAct
,80,,
let81VVDlet
me82PPme
address83VVaddress
justiciability84NNjusticiability
.85SENT.
Respondent86NNrespondent
's87POS's
brief88NNbrief
expressed89VVDexpress
doubts90NNSdoubt
about91INabout
redressability92NNredressability
,93,,
but94CCbut
redressability95NNredressability
and96CCand
the97DTthe
other98JJother
two99CDtwo
requirements100NNSrequirement
of101INof
Article102NPArticle
III103NPIII
standing104NNstanding
are105VBPbe
established106VVNestablish
here107RBhere
.108SENT.
First109RBfirst
,110,,
our111PP$our
injury112NNinjury
in113INin
fact114NNfact
is115VBZbe
the116DTthe
disclosure117NNdisclosure
of118INof
our119PP$our
members120NNSmember
'121POS'
store-level122JJstore-level
sales123NNSsale
information124NNinformation
that125IN/thatthat
they126PPthey
keep127VVkeep
secret128JJsecret
.129SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]130LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Not131RBnot
if132INif
the133DTthe
government134NNgovernment
decides135VVZdecide
that136IN/thatthat
it137PPit
does138VVZdo
n't139RBn't
want140VVwant
to141TOto
give142VVgive
it143PPit
.144SENT.
We145PPwe
already146RBalready
have147VHPhave
a148DTa
case149NNcase
that150WDTthat
says151VVZsay
,152,,
if153INif
the154DTthe
government155NNgovernment
voluntarily156RBvoluntarily
chooses157VVZchoose
to158TOto
disclose159VVdisclose
,160,,
you161PPyou
're162VBPbe
stuck163VVNstick
;164:;
you165PPyou
can166MDcan
't167RB't
appeal168NNappeal
.169SENT.
So170RBso
,171,,
here172RBhere
,173,,
the174DTthe
government175NNgovernment
chose176VVDchoose
not177RBnot
to178TOto
appeal179VVappeal
.180SENT.
It181PPit
chose182VVDchoose
,183,,
by184INby
definition185NNdefinition
,186,,
to187TOto
turn188VVturn
it189PPit
over190RPover
.191SENT.
Why192WRBwhy
are193VBPbe
n't194RBn't
you195PPyou
bound196VVDbind
by197INby
that198DTthat
decision199NNdecision
?200SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]201LOC[MR. YOUNG]
We202PPwe
're203VBPbe
not204RBnot
bound205VVNbind
for206INfor
it207PPit
because208INbecause
the209DTthe
intervention210NNintervention
that211IN/thatthat
we212PPwe
successfully213RBsuccessfully
moved214VVDmove
in215INin
the216DTthe
District217NPDistrict
of218INof
South219NPSouth
Dakota220NPDakota
made221VVDmake
us222PPus
a223DTa
proper224JJproper
party225NNparty
.226SENT.
We227PPwe
have228VHPhave
an229DTan
interest230NNinterest
that231WDTthat
allowed232VVDallow
us233PPus
to234TOto
intervene235VVintervene
.236SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]237LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But238CCbut
the239DTthe
...240:...
if241INif
you242PPyou
had243VHDhave
been244VBNbe
a245DTa
part246NNpart
of247INof
the248DTthe
...249:...
if250INif
you251PPyou
had252VHDhave
been253VBNbe
the254DTthe
original255JJoriginal
asker256NNasker
,257,,
we258PPwe
have259VHPhave
a260DTa
case261NNcase
that262WDTthat
says263VVZsay
...264:...
Crystal265NPCrystal
City266NPCity
...267:...
that268WDTthat
if269INif
the270DTthe
government271NNgovernment
chooses272VVZchoose
to273TOto
turn274VVturn
it275PPit
over276RPover
,277,,
you278PPyou
can279MDcan
't280RB't
appeal281NNappeal
.282SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]283LOC[MR. YOUNG]
And284CCand
the285DTthe
government286NNgovernment
did287VVDdo
not288RBnot
make289VVmake
that290DTthat
choice291NNchoice
.292SENT.
So293RBso
there294EXthere
are295VBPbe
really296RBreally
five297CDfive
things298NNSthing
.299SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]300LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Well301UHWell
,302,,
but303CCbut
they304PPthey
have305VHPhave
n't306RBn't
made307VVNmake
the308DTthe
choice309NNchoice
on310INon
this311DTthis
exemption312NNexemption
.313SENT.
They314PPthey
've315VHPhave
made316VVNmake
the317DTthe
choice318NNchoice
because319INbecause
of320INof
a321DTa
new322JJnew
law323NNlaw
.324SENT.
Is325VBZbe
n't326RBn't
the327DTthe
proper328JJproper
course329NNcourse
for330INfor
them331PPthem
to332TOto
go333VVgo
back334RBback
to335TOto
the336DTthe
district337NNdistrict
court338NNcourt
with339INwith
a340DTa
motion341NNmotion
for342INfor
reconsideration343NNreconsideration
or344CCor
for345INfor
them346PPthem
to347TOto
petition348VVpetition
the349DTthe
court350NNcourt
or351CCor
for352INfor
you353PPyou
to354TOto
go355VVgo
to356TOto
the357DTthe
court358NNcourt
or359CCor
for360INfor
...361:...
or362CCor
...363:...
or364CCor
for365INfor
someone366NNsomeone
else367RBelse
to368TOto
go369VVgo
to370TOto
the371DTthe
court372NNcourt
and373CCand
say374VVPsay
they375PPthey
have376VHPhave
to377TOto
turn378VVturn
it379PPit
over380RPover
?381SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]382LOC[MR. YOUNG]
No383NPNo
,384,,
Your385PP$your
Honor386NPHonor
.387SENT.
The388DTthe
government389NNgovernment
in390INin
this391DTthis
case392NNcase
made393VVDmake
a394DTa
number395NNnumber
of396INof
steps397NNSstep
that398WDTthat
make399VVPmake
clear400JJclear
that401IN/thatthat
our402PP$our
redressability403NNredressability
is404VBZbe
not405RBnot
only406RBonly
likely407JJlikely
but408CCbut
certain409JJcertain
.410SENT.
And411CCand
let412VVlet
me413PPme
start414VVstart
because415INbecause
standing416VVGstand
at417INat
the418DTthe
time419NNtime
...420:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]421LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Well422UHwell
,423,,
it424PPit
's425VBZbe
not426RBnot
certain427JJcertain
until428INuntil
the429DTthe
district430NNdistrict
court431NNcourt
relieves432VVZrelieve
them433PPthem
of434INof
the435DTthe
earlier436JJRearly
judgment437NNjudgment
,438,,
telling439VVGtell
them440PPthem
that441IN/thatthat
Exemption442NPExemption
3443CD3
did444VVDdo
n't445RBn't
apply446VVapply
.447SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]448LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well449UHWell
,450,,
that451WDTthat
...452:...
that453DTthat
premise454NNpremise
,455,,
I456PPI
think457VVPthink
,458,,
is459VBZbe
...460:...
is461VBZbe
a462DTa
mistaken463JJmistaken
one464CDone
.465SENT.
And466CCand
if467INif
you468PPyou
look469VVPlook
at470INat
pages471NNSpage
30472CD@card@
to473TOto
31474CD@card@
of475INof
the476DTthe
government477NNgovernment
's478POS's
brief479NNbrief
,480,,
for481INfor
example482NNexample
,483,,
they484PPthey
make485VVPmake
clear486JJclear
that487IN/thatthat
they488PPthey
are489VBPbe
not490RBnot
pressing491VVGpress
an492DTan
Exemption493NPExemption
3494CD3
argument495NNargument
here496RBhere
.497SENT.
They498PPthey
are499VBPbe
not500RBnot
requiring501VVGrequire
this502DTthis
Court503NPCourt
or504CCor
even505RBeven
asking506VVGask
this507DTthis
Court508NPCourt
to509TOto
reconsider510VVreconsider
the511DTthe
Section512NNsection
2018513CD@card@
(514((
c515LSc
)516))
argument517NNargument
,518,,
on519INon
which520WDTwhich
the521DTthe
Eighth522JJeighth
Circu523NPCircu
it524PPit
's525VBZbe
first526JJfirst
judgment527NNjudgment
...528:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]529LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But530CCbut
that531DTthat
's532VBZbe
the533DTthe
basis534NNbasis
for535INfor
their536PP$their
refusal537NNrefusal
to538TOto
turn539VVturn
it540PPit
over541RPover
now542RBnow
.543SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]544LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well545UHWell
,546,,
no547UHno
,548,,
the549DTthe
...550:...
the551DTthe
basis552NNbasis
for553INfor
...554:...
for555INfor
their556PP$their
refusal557NNrefusal
to558TOto
turn559VVturn
it560PPit
over561INover
now562RBnow
is563VBZbe
an564DTan
Exemption565NPExemption
4566CD4
basis567NNbasis
,568,,
that569IN/thatthat
the570DTthe
information571NNinformation
...572:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]573LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Well574UHwell
,575,,
they576PPthey
can577MDcan
speak578VVspeak
for579INfor
themselves580PPthemselves
,581,,
but582CCbut
I583PPI
thought584VVDthink
...585:...
[MR. YOUNG]586LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Agreed587VVDagree
.588SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]589LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...590:...
when591WRBwhen
they592PPthey
chose593VVDchoose
not594RBnot
to595TOto
appeal596VVappeal
,597,,
they598PPthey
chose599VVDchoose
not600RBnot
...601:...
they602PPthey
chose603VVDchoose
to604TOto
follow605VVfollow
the606DTthe
order607NNorder
of608INof
the609DTthe
court610NNcourt
to611TOto
turn612VVturn
it613PPit
over614RPover
.615SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]616LOC[MR. YOUNG]
There617EXthere
are618VBPbe
a619DTa
number620NNnumber
of621INof
things622NNSthing
that623WDTthat
differentiate624VVPdifferentiate
this625DTthis
from626INfrom
a627DTa
situation628NNsituation
like629INlike
that630DTthat
.631SENT.
For632INfor
example633NNexample
,634,,
instead635RBinstead
of636INof
voluntarily637RBvoluntarily
disclosing638VVGdisclose
it639PPit
,640,,
which641WDTwhich
would642MDwould
be643VBbe
what644WPwhat
they645PPthey
would646MDwould
do647VVdo
if648INif
they649PPthey
decided650VVDdecide
to651TOto
follow652VVfollow
it653PPit
,654,,
they655PPthey
facilitated656VVDfacilitate
our657PP$our
intervention658NNintervention
by659INby
alerting660VVGalert
us661PPus
to662TOto
the663DTthe
possibility664NNpossibility
of665INof
judicial666JJjudicial
intervention667NNintervention
.668SENT.
They669PPthey
then670RBthen
,671,,
when672WRBwhen
we673PPwe
did674VVDdo
intervene675VVintervene
,676,,
told677VVDtell
the678DTthe
district679NNdistrict
court680NNcourt
,681,,
they682PPthey
told683VVDtell
the684DTthe
federal685JJfederal
court686NNcourt
,687,,
as688INas
they689PPthey
've690VHPhave
told691VVNtell
this692DTthis
Court693NPCourt
,694,,
we695PPwe
will696MDwill
not697RBnot
release698VVrelease
that699DTthat
information700NNinformation
unless701INunless
a702DTa
final703JJfinal
judgment704NNjudgment
in705INin
the706DTthe
judicial707JJjudicial
system708NNsystem
requires709VVZrequire
it710PPit
.711SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]712LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Do713VVPdo
you714PPyou
understand715VVPunderstand
the716DTthe
government717NNgovernment
to718TOto
be719VBbe
firmly720RBfirmly
committed721VVNcommit
to722TOto
not723RBnot
releasing724VVGrelease
the725DTthe
information726NNinformation
unless727INunless
required728VVNrequire
to729TOto
?730SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]731LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Yes732NPYes
,733,,
that734WDTthat
's735VBZbe
what736WPwhat
I737PPI
understand738VVPunderstand
.739SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]740LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
I741PPI
noticed742VVDnotice
them743PPthem
on744INon
your745PP$your
...746:...
your747PP$your
side748NNside
of749INof
the750DTthe
lectern751NNlectern
.752SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]753LOC[MR. YOUNG]
And754CCand
I755PPI
won756MDwill
't757RB't
speak758VVspeak
for759INfor
them760PPthem
,761,,
but762CCbut
that763DTthat
's764VBZbe
what765WPwhat
they766PPthey
have767VHPhave
represented768VVNrepresent
not769RBnot
only770RBonly
to771TOto
the772DTthe
district773NNdistrict
court774NNcourt
but775CCbut
to776TOto
this777DTthis
Court778NPCourt
.779SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]780LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Now781RBnow
,782,,
of783INof
course784NNcourse
,785,,
they786PPthey
remain787VVPremain
free788JJfree
to789TOto
change790VVchange
their791PP$their
mind792NNmind
.793SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]794LOC[MR. YOUNG]
And795CCand
that796WDTthat
would797MDwould
be798VBbe
a799DTa
...800:...
a801DTa
...802:...
a803DTa
different804JJdifferent
situation805NNsituation
,806,,
but807CCbut
the808DTthe
question809NNquestion
for810INfor
standing811VVGstand
at812INat
the813DTthe
time814NNtime
when815WRBwhen
we816PPwe
invoked817VVDinvoke
the818DTthe
appellate819JJappellate
jurisdiction820NNjurisdiction
of821INof
the822DTthe
federal823JJfederal
courts824NNScourt
was825VBDbe
would826MDwould
we827PPwe
have828VHhave
a829DTa
likelihood830NNlikelihood
of831INof
relief832NNrelief
,833,,
and834CCand
the835DTthe
answer836NNanswer
is837VBZbe
yes838UHyes
.839SENT.
And840CCand
,841,,
right842RBright
now843RBnow
,844,,
based845VVNbase
on846INon
the847DTthe
Solicitor848NPSolicitor
General849NPGeneral
's850POS's
brief851NNbrief
,852,,
that853WDTthat
was854VBDbe
the855DTthe
thing856NNthing
that857IN/thatthat
my858PP$my
friend859NNfriend
on860INon
the861DTthe
other862JJother
side863NNside
invoked864VVNinvoke
in865INin
his866PP$his
brief867NNbrief
to868TOto
this869DTthis
Court870NPCourt
.871SENT.
That872DTthat
would873MDwould
be874VBbe
a875DTa
mootness876NNmootness
question877NNquestion
.878SENT.
And879CCand
,880,,
of881INof
course882NNcourse
,883,,
mootness884NNmootness
can885MDcan
be886VBbe
established887VVNestablish
only888RBonly
if889INif
it890PPit
's891VBZbe
impossible892JJimpossible
that893IN/thatthat
this894DTthis
Court895NPCourt
's896POS's
reversal897NNreversal
would898MDwould
give899VVgive
us900PPus
meaningful901JJmeaningful
relief902NNrelief
.903SENT.
The904DTthe
opposite905NNopposite
is906VBZbe
true907JJtrue
.908SENT.
If909INif
this910DTthis
Court911NPCourt
reverses912VVZreverse
,913,,
the914DTthe
only915JJonly
thing916NNthing
that917WDTthat
will918MDwill
lead919VVlead
to920TOto
our921PP$our
information922NNinformation
certainly923RBcertainly
being924VBGbe
made925VVNmake
public926NNpublic
will927MDwill
be928VBbe
destroyed929VVNdestroy
.930SENT.
And931CCand
that932DTthat
's933VBZbe
why934WRBwhy
all935PDTall
the936DTthe
requirements937NNSrequirement
of938INof
Article939NPArticle
III940NPIII
standing941NNstanding
are942VBPbe
met943VVNmeet
...944:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]945LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But946CCbut
it947PPit
won948MDwill
't949RB't
be950VBbe
destroyed951VVNdestroy
because952INbecause
they953PPthey
have954VHPhave
a955DTa
2018956CD@card@
(957((
c958LSc
)959))
argument960NNargument
.961SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]962LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well963UHWell
,964,,
the965DTthe
fact966NNfact
,967,,
as968RBas
in969INin
Milner970NPMilner
,971,,
in972INin
which973WDTwhich
there974EXthere
was975VBDbe
an976DTan
Exemption977NPExemption
7978CD7
argument979NNargument
pending980VVGpend
,981,,
this982DTthis
Court983NPCourt
took984VVDtake
it985PPit
to986TOto
decide987VVdecide
Exemption988NPExemption
2989CD2
.990SENT.
Sure991RBsure
,992,,
there993EXthere
's994VBZbe
a995DTa
2018996CD@card@
(997((
c998LSc
)999))
argument1000NNargument
that1001IN/thatthat
,1002,,
in1003INin
theory1004NNtheory
,1005,,
would1006MDwould
be1007VBbe
pending1008VVGpend
if1009INif
this1010DTthis
Court1011NPCourt
were1012VBDbe
not1013RBnot
persuaded1014VVNpersuade
by1015INby
anything1016NNanything
we1017PPwe
say1018VVPsay
,1019,,
there1020EXthere
's1021VHZhave
been1022VBNbe
an1023DTan
intervening1024VVGintervene
change1025NNchange
in1026INin
the1027DTthe
law1028NNlaw
...1029:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1030LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
If1031INif
they1032PPthey
're1033VBPbe
wrong1034JJwrong
on1035INon
20181036CD@card@
(1037((
c1038LSc
)1039))
,1040,,
they1041PPthey
have1042VHPhave
to1043TOto
comply1044VVcomply
with1045INwith
the1046DTthe
extant1047JJextant
judgment1048NNjudgment
under1049INunder
Exemption1050NPExemption
41051CD4
?1052SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]1053LOC[MR. YOUNG]
No1054NPNo
,1055,,
I1056PPI
...1057:...
I1058PPI
disagree1059VVPdisagree
,1060,,
and1061CCand
I1062PPI
will1063MDwill
allow1064VVallow
my1065PP$my
friend1066NNfriend
from1067INfrom
the1068DTthe
government1069NNgovernment
to1070TOto
explain1071VVexplain
their1072PP$their
position1073NNposition
.1074SENT.
But1075CCbut
they1076PPthey
're1077VBPbe
making1078VVGmake
an1079DTan
Exemption1080NPExemption
41081CD4
argument1082NNargument
based1083VVNbase
on1084INon
the1085DTthe
...1086:...
the1087DTthe
...1088:...
what1089WPwhat
they1090PPthey
say1091VVPsay
in1092INin
part1093NNpart
B1094NNB
.1095SENT.
21096CD2
of1097INof
their1098PP$their
brief1099NNbrief
.1100SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1101LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
They1102PPthey
're1103VBPbe
trying1104VVGtry
to1105TOto
piggyback1106NNpiggyback
their1107PP$their
appeal1108NNappeal
on1109INon
you1110PPyou
.1111SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]1112LOC[MR. YOUNG]
No1113NPNo
,1114,,
I1115PPI
...1116:...
I1117PPI
disagree1118VVPdisagree
with1119INwith
that1120IN/thatthat
as1121RBas
well1122RBwell
,1123,,
Justice1124NPJustice
Sotomayor1125NPSotomayor
.1126SENT.
I1127PPI
think1128VVPthink
what1129WPwhat
the1130DTthe
government1131NNgovernment
is1132VBZbe
saying1133VVGsay
is1134VBZbe
we1135PPwe
've1136VHPhave
had1137VHNhave
four1138CDfour
decades1139NNSdecade
of1140INof
the1141DTthe
highest1142JJShigh
level1143NNlevel
promise1144NNpromise
of1145INof
confidentiality1146NNconfidentiality
that1147IN/thatthat
the1148DTthe
government1149NNgovernment
can1150MDcan
make1151VVmake
to1152TOto
its1153PP$its
citizens1154NNScitizen
,1155,,
and1156CCand
that1157WDTthat
is1158VBZbe
that1159IN/thatthat
this1160DTthis
kind1161NNkind
of1162INof
confidential1163JJconfidential
information1164NNinformation
,1165,,
we1166PPwe
will1167MDwill
protect1168VVprotect
the1169DTthe
confidentiality1170NNconfidentiality
of1171INof
it1172PPit
.1173SENT.
And1174CCand
for1175INfor
that1176DTthat
reason1177NNreason
,1178,,
even1179RBeven
if1180INif
the1181DTthe
motivation1182NNmotivation
that1183IN/thatthat
they1184PPthey
had1185VHDhave
back1186RBback
in1187INin
19791188CD@card@
for1189INfor
starting1190VVGstart
down1191RPdown
that1192DTthat
process1193NNprocess
turns1194VVZturn
out1195RPout
to1196TOto
be1197VBbe
wrong1198JJwrong
,1199,,
nonetheless1200RBnonetheless
,1201,,
the1202DTthe
promise1203NNpromise
of1204INof
confidentiality1205NNconfidentiality
,1206,,
which1207WDTwhich
Exemption1208NPExemption
41209CD4
and1210CCand
not1211RBnot
Exemption1212NPExemption
31213CD3
protects1214VVZprotect
,1215,,
remains1216VVZremain
.1217SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1218LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Mr1219NPMr
.1220SENT.
Young1221NPYoung
...1222:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]1223LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But1224CCbut
was1225VBDbe
n't1226RBn't
the1227DTthe
whole1228JJwhole
purpose1229NNpurpose
of1230INof
...1231:...
FOIA1232NPFOIA
says1233VVZsay
disclose1234VVdisclose
,1235,,
and1236CCand
one1237CDone
of1238INof
the1239DTthe
concerns1240NNSconcern
was1241VBDbe
the1242DTthe
government1243NNgovernment
official1244NNofficial
,1245,,
for1246INfor
one1247CDone
reason1248NNreason
or1249CCor
another1250DTanother
,1251,,
does1252VVZdo
n't1253RBn't
want1254VVwant
to1255TOto
disclose1256VVdisclose
.1257SENT.
There1258EXthere
have1259VHPhave
been1260VBNbe
cases1261NNScase
of1262INof
a1263DTa
captive1264JJcaptive
agency1265NNagency
,1266,,
for1267INfor
example1268NNexample
.1269SENT.
So1270RBso
,1271,,
to1272TOto
...1273:...
to1274TOto
say1275VVsay
the1276DTthe
government1277NNgovernment
can1278MDcan
control1279VVcontrol
this1280DTthis
by1281INby
making1282VVGmake
a1283DTa
promise1284NNpromise
that1285IN/thatthat
it1286PPit
won1287MDwill
't1288RB't
disclose1289VVdisclose
,1290,,
that1291WDTthat
seems1292VVZseem
to1293TOto
run1294VVrun
counter1295VVcounter
to1296TOto
the1297DTthe
whole1298JJwhole
idea1299NNidea
of1300INof
FOIA1301NPFOIA
.1302SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]1303LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well1304UHwell
,1305,,
it1306PPit
would1307MDwould
perhaps1308RBperhaps
run1309VVrun
counter1310NNcounter
to1311TOto
the1312DTthe
idea1313NNidea
of1314INof
FOIA1315NPFOIA
if1316INif
it1317PPit
were1318VBDbe
the1319DTthe
kind1320NNkind
of1321INof
information1322NNinformation
that1323WDTthat
were1324VBDbe
...1325:...
was1326VBDbe
about1327RBabout
the1328DTthe
government1329NNgovernment
's1330POS's
own1331JJown
doings1332NNSdoing
or1333CCor
even1334RBeven
,1335,,
conceivably1336RBconceivably
,1337,,
something1338NNsomething
that1339WDTthat
's1340VBZbe
not1341RBnot
presented1342VVNpresent
here1343RBhere
,1344,,
if1345INif
there1346EXthere
were1347VBDbe
willy-nilly1348RBwilly-nilly
ad1349NNad
hoc1350FWhoc
promises1351NNSpromise
of1352INof
confidentiality1353NNconfidentiality
in1354INin
which1355WDTwhich
low-level1356JJlow-level
employees1357NNSemployee
could1358MDcould
wave1359VVwave
a1360DTa
wand1361NNwand
and1362CCand
say1363VVPsay
confidential1364JJconfidential
,1365,,
confidential1366JJconfidential
,1367,,
but1368CCbut
I1369PPI
think1370VVPthink
that1371IN/thatthat
what1372WPwhat
this1373DTthis
Court1374NPCourt
has1375VHZhave
repeatedly1376RBrepeatedly
said1377VVNsay
...1378:...
I1379PPI
'll1380MDwill
mention1381VVmention
the1382DTthe
Department1383NPDepartment
of1384INof
Justice1385NPJustice
versus1386CCversus
the1387DTthe
Reporters1388NNSreporter
Committee1389NPCommittee
case1390NNcase
,1391,,
where1392WRBwhere
the1393DTthe
Court1394NPCourt
says1395VVZsay
:1396::
"1397``"
Yes1398UHyes
,1399,,
FOIA1400NPFOIA
's1401POS's
basic1402JJbasic
policy1403NNpolicy
focuses1404VVZfocus
on1405INon
the1406DTthe
citizens1407NNScitizen
'1408POS'
right1409NNright
to1410TOto
be1411VBbe
informed1412VVNinform
about1413INabout
what1414WPwhat
their1415PP$their
government1416NNgovernment
is1417VBZbe
up1418RBup
to1419TOto
.1420SENT.
"1421``"
That1422DTthat
's1423VBZbe
a1424DTa
direct1425JJdirect
quote1426NNquote
.1427SENT.
But1428CCbut
then1429RBthen
the1430DTthe
Court1431NPCourt
immediately1432RBimmediately
says1433VVZsay
that1434DTthat
purpose1435NNpurpose
,1436,,
however1437RBhowever
,1438,,
is1439VBZbe
not1440RBnot
fostered1441VVNfoster
by1442INby
disclosure1443NNdisclosure
of1444INof
information1445NNinformation
about1446INabout
private1447JJprivate
citizens1448NNScitizen
that1449WDTthat
has1450VHZhave
accumulated1451VVNaccumulate
in1452INin
various1453JJvarious
governmental1454JJgovernmental
files1455NNSfile
but1456CCbut
that1457WDTthat
reveals1458VVZreveal
little1459JJlittle
or1460CCor
nothing1461NNnothing
about1462INabout
an1463DTan
agency1464NNagency
's1465POS's
own1466JJown
conduct1467NNconduct
.1468SENT.
And1469CCand
so1470RBso
,1471,,
here1472RBhere
,1473,,
what1474WPwhat
we1475PPwe
see1476VVPsee
is1477VBZbe
a1478DTa
choice1479NNchoice
.1480SENT.
When1481WRBwhen
a1482DTa
SNAP1483JJsnap
beneficiary1484NNbeneficiary
receives1485VVZreceive
an1486DTan
allocation1487NNallocation
from1488INfrom
the1489DTthe
government1490NNgovernment
,1491,,
their1492PP$their
choice1493NNchoice
to1494TOto
shop1495VVshop
at1496INat
this1497DTthis
grocery1498NNgrocery
store1499NNstore
rather1500RBrather
than1501INthan
one1502CDone
across1503INacross
the1504DTthe
street1505NNstreet
is1506VBZbe
in1507INin
no1508DTno
sense1509NNsense
government1510NNgovernment
action1511NNaction
.1512SENT.
It1513PPit
is1514VBZbe
the1515DTthe
unmediated1516JJunmediated
decision1517NNdecision
of1518INof
third1519JJthird
parties1520NNSparty
.1521SENT.
It1522PPit
tells1523VVZtell
you1524PPyou
,1525,,
in1526INin
other1527JJother
words1528NNSword
,1529,,
an1530DTan
awful1531JJawful
lot1532NNlot
about1533INabout
Mrs1534NNMrs
.1535SENT.
Smith1536NPSmith
or1537CCor
Mr1538NPMr
.1539SENT.
Jones1540NPJones
and1541CCand
their1542PP$their
choices1543NNSchoice
,1544,,
and1545CCand
it1546PPit
tells1547VVZtell
you1548PPyou
a1549DTa
lot1550NNlot
about1551INabout
how1552WRBhow
those1553DTthose
two1554CDtwo
grocery1555NNgrocery
stores1556NNSstore
market1557NNmarket
and1558CCand
...1559:...
and1560CCand
...1561:...
and1562CCand
sell1563VVsell
and1564CCand
what1565WPwhat
their1566PP$their
selection1567NNselection
might1568MDmight
be1569VBbe
.1570SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]1571LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I1572PPI
do1573VVPdo
n't1574RBn't
doubt1575VVdoubt
that1576IN/thatthat
you1577PPyou
're1578VBPbe
heard1579VVNhear
.1580SENT.
I1581PPI
...1582:...
I1583PPI
...1584:...
I1585PPI
...1586:...
I1587PPI
do1588VVPdo
...1589:...
I1590PPI
can1591MDcan
't1592RB't
quite1593RBquite
figure1594VVfigure
out1595RPout
how1596WRBhow
this1597DTthis
mootness1598NNmootness
thing1599NNthing
works1600NNSwork
.1601SENT.
It1602PPit
seems1603VVZseem
to1604TOto
me1605PPme
there1606EXthere
are1607VBPbe
two1608CDtwo
laws1609NNSlaw
,1610,,
A1611NPA
and1612CCand
B1613NPB
.1614SENT.
All1615DTall
right1616NNright
?1617SENT?
A1618DTa
is1619VBZbe
the1620DTthe
...1621:...
the1622DTthe
one1623CDone
you1624PPyou
're1625VBPbe
interested1626JJinterested
in1627INin
,1628,,
and1629CCand
B1630NPB
is1631VBZbe
this1632DTthis
other1633JJother
one1634CDone
that1635WDTthat
stops1636VVZstop
them1637PPthem
from1638INfrom
...1639:...
maybe1640RBmaybe
...1641:...
from1642INfrom
giving1643VVGgive
out1644RPout
information1645NNinformation
.1646SENT.
Now1647RBnow
,1648,,
here1649RBhere
,1650,,
you1651PPyou
're1652VBPbe
attacking1653VVGattack
A1654DTa
,1655,,
so1656RBso
I1657PPI
'm1658VBPbe
asking1659VVGask
,1660,,
does1661VVZdo
A1662DTa
cause1663VVcause
you1664PPyou
injury1665NNinjury
?1666SENT?
Not1667RBnot
does1668VVZdo
B1669NPB
cause1670VVcause
you1671PPyou
injury1672NNinjury
.1673SENT.
Now1674RBnow
,1675,,
if1676INif
B1677NPB
stops1678VVZstop
them1679PPthem
from1680INfrom
giving1681VVGgive
out1682RPout
the1683DTthe
information1684NNinformation
,1685,,
if1686INif
you1687PPyou
win1688VVPwin
on1689INon
A1690DTa
,1691,,
you1692PPyou
do1693VVPdo
n't1694RBn't
get1695VVget
it1696PPit
.1697SENT.
If1698INif
you1699PPyou
lose1700VVPlose
on1701INon
A1702DTa
,1703,,
you1704PPyou
do1705VVPdo
n't1706RBn't
get1707VVget
it1708PPit
.1709SENT.
If1710INif
B1711NPB
does1712VVZdo
n't1713RBn't
stop1714VVstop
them1715PPthem
from1716INfrom
giving1717VVGgive
out1718RPout
information1719NNinformation
,1720,,
if1721INif
you1722PPyou
win1723VVPwin
on1724INon
A1725DTa
,1726,,
you1727PPyou
get1728VVPget
it1729PPit
.1730SENT.
If1731INif
you1732PPyou
do1733VVPdo
n't1734RBn't
...1735:...
see1736VVsee
,1737,,
it1738PPit
works1739VVZwork
...1740:...
the1741DTthe
...1742:...
the1743DTthe
...1744:...
the1745DTthe
result1746NNresult
is1747VBZbe
the1748DTthe
same1749JJsame
no1750DTno
matter1751NNmatter
how1752WRBhow
we1753PPwe
decide1754VVPdecide
your1755PP$your
case1756NNcase
.1757SENT.
We1758PPwe
just1759RBjust
do1760VVPdo
n't1761RBn't
know1762VVknow
about1763INabout
B1764NPB
.1765SENT.
Now1766RBnow
have1767VHPhave
I1768PPI
got1769VVDget
that1770DTthat
right1771NNright
?1772SENT?
And1773CCand
if1774INif
I1775PPI
...1776:...
if1777INif
I1778PPI
've1779VHPhave
got1780VVNget
that1781IN/thatthat
right1782RBright
,1783,,
I1784PPI
...1785:...
I1786PPI
do1787VVPdo
n't1788RBn't
know1789VVknow
a1790DTa
standing1791NNstanding
case1792NNcase
right1793NNright
in1794INin
point1795NNpoint
or1796CCor
a1797DTa
mootness1798NNmootness
case1799NNcase
right1800NNright
in1801INin
point1802NNpoint
.1803SENT.
I1804PPI
'm1805VBPbe
not1806RBnot
sure1807JJsure
what1808WPwhat
to1809TOto
do1810VVdo
.1811SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]1812LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well1813UHwell
...1814:...
well1815RBwell
,1816,,
if1817INif
I1818PPI
'm1819VBPbe
understanding1820VVGunderstand
you1821PPyou
,1822,,
Justice1823NPJustice
Breyer1824NPBreyer
,1825,,
I1826PPI
...1827:...
I1828PPI
do1829VVPdo
n't1830RBn't
think1831VVthink
it1832PPit
raises1833VVZraise
either1834RBeither
one1835CDone
of1836INof
those1837DTthose
justiciability1838NNjusticiability
questions1839NNSquestion
because1840INbecause
the1841DTthe
Court1842NPCourt
can1843MDcan
have1844VHhave
in1845INin
reserve1846JJreserve
many1847JJmany
grounds1848NNSground
that1849IN/thatthat
the1850DTthe
lower1851JJRlow
courts1852NNScourt
,1853,,
for1854INfor
example1855NNexample
,1856,,
may1857MDmay
not1858RBnot
have1859VHhave
addressed1860VVNaddress
.1861SENT.
In1862INin
Milner1863NPMilner
,1864,,
I1865PPI
mentioned1866VVDmention
Exemption1867NPExemption
71868CD7
was1869VBDbe
still1870RBstill
there1871RBthere
.1872SENT.
Now1873RBnow
,1874,,
if1875INif
Exemption1876NPExemption
71877CD7
was1878VBDbe
well1879RBwell
taken1880VVNtake
,1881,,
Exemption1882NPExemption
21883CD2
would1884MDwould
n't1885RBn't
have1886VHhave
been1887VBNbe
necessary1888JJnecessary
.1889SENT.
The1890DTthe
Court1891NPCourt
granted1892VVDgrant
in1893INin
Milner1894NPMilner
to1895TOto
resolve1896VVresolve
what1897WPwhat
Exemption1898NPExemption
21899CD2
meant1900VVDmean
,1901,,
and1902CCand
it1903PPit
granted1904VVDgrant
in1905INin
this1906DTthis
case1907NNcase
to1908TOto
resolve1909VVresolve
what1910WPwhat
Exemption1911NNexemption
41912CD4
means1913NNSmean
.1914SENT.
And1915CCand
if1916INif
you1917PPyou
do1918VVPdo
it1919PPit
and1920CCand
you1921PPyou
reverse1922RBreverse
...1923:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1924LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
The1925DTthe
problem1926NNproblem
with1927INwith
that1928DTthat
in1929INin
Milner1930NPMilner
is1931VBZbe
...1932:...
and1933CCand
the1934DTthe
big1935JJbig
difference1936NNdifference
is1937VBZbe
that1938IN/thatthat
the1939DTthe
government1940NNgovernment
chose1941VVDchoose
not1942RBnot
to1943TOto
appeal1944VVappeal
the1945DTthe
ruling1946NNruling
on1947INon
Exemption1948NPExemption
41949CD4
,1950,,
so1951RBso
it1952PPit
acceded1953VVDaccede
to1954TOto
turning1955VVGturn
it1956PPit
over1957RPover
under1958INunder
that1959DTthat
exemption1960NNexemption
.1961SENT.
And1962CCand
under1963INunder
Crystal1964NPCrystal
City1965NPCity
,1966,,
we1967PPwe
said1968VVDsay
they1969PPthey
...1970:...
you1971PPyou
...1972:...
they1973PPthey
or1974CCor
you1975PPyou
can1976MDcan
't1977RB't
appeal1978NNappeal
that1979RBthat
.1980SENT.
And1981CCand
you1982PPyou
admit1983VVPadmit
if1984INif
that1985WDTthat
was1986VBDbe
all1987RBall
of1988INof
it1989PPit
and1990CCand
they1991PPthey
had1992VHDhave
chosen1993VVNchoose
to1994TOto
turn1995VVturn
it1996PPit
over1997RPover
,1998,,
you1999PPyou
would2000MDwould
get2001VVget
it2002PPit
.2003SENT.
So2004RBso
now2005RBnow
the2006DTthe
question2007NNquestion
is2008VBZbe
can2009MDcan
they2010PPthey
...2011:...
and2012CCand
they2013PPthey
and2014CCand
you2015PPyou
do2016VVPdo
an2017DTan
end-run2018NNend-run
around2019INaround
Crystal2020NPCrystal
City2021NPCity
by2022INby
simply2023RBsimply
saying2024VVGsay
,2025,,
no2026UHno
,2027,,
we2028PPwe
're2029VBPbe
really2030RBreally
not2031RBnot
going2032VVGgo
to2033TOto
turn2034VVturn
it2035PPit
over2036RPover
because2037INbecause
of2038INof
something2039NNsomething
else2040RBelse
,2041,,
but2042CCbut
we2043PPwe
really2044RBreally
did2045VVDdo
n't2046RBn't
want2047VVwant
to2048TOto
challenge2049VVchallenge
Exemption2050NPExemption
42051CD4
at2052INat
all2053DTall
and2054CCand
we2055PPwe
were2056VBDbe
going2057VVGgo
to2058TOto
turn2059VVturn
it2060PPit
over2061RPover
because2062INbecause
we2063PPwe
did2064VVDdo
n't2065RBn't
really2066RBreally
think2067VVthink
the2068DTthe
pricing2069NNpricing
information2070NNinformation
was2071VBDbe
confidential2072JJconfidential
back2073RBback
then2074RBthen
.2075SENT.
But2076CCbut
now2077RBnow
we2078PPwe
think2079VVPthink
we2080PPwe
're2081VBPbe
going2082VVGgo
to2083TOto
change2084VVchange
our2085PP$our
mind2086NNmind
...2087:...
this2088DTthis
is2089VBZbe
how2090WRBhow
I2091PPI
'm2092VBPbe
reading2093VVGread
the2094DTthe
argument2095NNargument
...2096:...
and2097CCand
so2098RBso
we2099PPwe
're2100VBPbe
going2101VVGgo
to2102TOto
piggyback2103NNpiggyback
on2104INon
a2105DTa
private2106JJprivate
entity2107NNentity
raising2108VVGraise
an2109DTan
issue2110NNissue
that2111IN/thatthat
we2112PPwe
should2113MDshould
have2114VHhave
appealed2115VVNappeal
on2116RPon
.2117SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]2118LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Justice2119NPJustice
Sotomayor2120NPSotomayor
,2121,,
I2122PPI
do2123VVPdo
n't2124RBn't
believe2125VVbelieve
the2126DTthe
government2127NNgovernment
's2128VBZbe
piggybacking2129VVGpiggyback
at2130INat
all2131DTall
.2132SENT.
They2133PPthey
're2134VBPbe
here2135RBhere
as2136INas
an2137DTan
amicus2138NNamicus
.2139SENT.
And2140CCand
it2141PPit
is2142VBZbe
we2143PPwe
,2144,,
the2145DTthe
Food2146NPFood
Marketing2147NPMarketing
Institute2148NPInstitute
...2149:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2150LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But2151CCbut
why2152NNwhy
...2153:...
why2154WRBwhy
can2155MDcan
you2156PPyou
,2157,,
without2158INwithout
getting2159VVGget
stuck2160VVNstick
in2161INin
Crystal2162NPCrystal
City2163NPCity
?2164SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]2165LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well2166UHWell
,2167,,
because2168RBbecause
...2169:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2170LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Just2171RBjust
because2172INbecause
they2173PPthey
've2174VHPhave
said2175VVNsay
I2176PPI
won2177MDwill
't2178RB't
turn2179VVturn
it2180PPit
over2181RPover
,2182,,
but2183CCbut
they2184PPthey
're2185VBPbe
bound2186VVNbind
to2187TOto
turn2188VVturn
it2189PPit
over2190RPover
right2191RBright
now2192RBnow
by2193INby
a2194DTa
judgment2195NNjudgment
below2196RBbelow
,2197,,
and2198CCand
they2199PPthey
have2200VHPhave
n't2201RBn't
asked2202VVNask
the2203DTthe
court2204NNcourt
below2205RBbelow
to2206TOto
reconsider2207VVreconsider
that2208DTthat
judgment2209NNjudgment
.2210SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]2211LOC[MR. YOUNG]
I2212PPI
...2213:...
I2214PPI
...2215:...
I2216PPI
think2217VVPthink
it2218PPit
's2219VBZbe
as2220RBas
simple2221JJsimple
as2222RBas
...2223:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2224LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
They2225PPthey
raised2226VVDraise
Exemption2227NPExemption
32228CD3
.2229SENT.
They2230PPthey
lost2231VVDlose
.2232SENT.
A2233DTa
change2234NNchange
of2235INof
law2236NNlaw
has2237VHZhave
happened2238VVNhappen
.2239SENT.
They2240PPthey
should2241MDshould
have2242VHhave
moved2243VVNmove
for2244INfor
reconsideration2245NNreconsideration
,2246,,
and2247CCand
they2248PPthey
did2249VVDdo
n't2250RBn't
.2251SENT.
So2252RBso
why2253WRBwhy
are2254VBPbe
n't2255RBn't
they2256PPthey
stuck2257VVDstick
?2258SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]2259LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Because2260INbecause
we2261PPwe
intervened2262VVDintervene
,2263,,
and2264CCand
the2265DTthe
opportunity2266NNopportunity
to2267TOto
conclude2268VVconclude
that2269IN/thatthat
we2270PPwe
are2271VBPbe
not2272RBnot
a2273DTa
proper2274JJproper
party2275NNparty
to2276TOto
be2277VBbe
able2278JJable
to2279TOto
make2280VVmake
any2281DTany
of2282INof
these2283DTthese
merits2284NNSmerit
inquiries2285NNSinquiry
has2286VHZhave
long2287RBlong
since2288RBsince
passed2289VVNpass
.2290SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]2291LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Mr2292NPMr
.2293SENT.
Young2294NPYoung
,2295,,
may2296MDmay
I2297PPI
ask2298VVask
you2299PPyou
a2300DTa
question2301NNquestion
about2302INabout
your2303PP$your
substantive2304JJsubstantive
standard2305NNstandard
?2306SENT?
You2307PPyou
at2308INat
some2309DTsome
points2310NNSpoint
in2311INin
your2312PP$your
brief2313NNbrief
say2314VVPsay
that2315IN/thatthat
the2316DTthe
question2317NNquestion
is2318VBZbe
simply2319RBsimply
whether2320INwhether
the2321DTthe
information2322NNinformation
is2323VBZbe
private2324JJprivate
,2325,,
private2326JJprivate
being2327VBGbe
a2328DTa
synonym2329NNsynonym
for2330INfor
confidential2331JJconfidential
.2332SENT.
At2333INat
other2334JJother
points2335NNSpoint
in2336INin
your2337PP$your
brief2338NNbrief
,2339,,
you2340PPyou
talk2341VVPtalk
about2342RBabout
whether2343INwhether
the2344DTthe
information2345NNinformation
is2346VBZbe
kept2347VVNkeep
private2348JJprivate
.2349SENT.
To2350TOTo
me2351PPme
,2352,,
those2353DTthose
two2354CDtwo
things2355NNSthing
are2356VBPbe
a2357DTa
little2358JJlittle
bit2359NNbit
different2360JJdifferent
,2361,,
that2362IN/thatthat
the2363DTthe
idea2364NNidea
of2365INof
keeping2366VVGkeep
something2367NNsomething
private2368JJprivate
is2369VBZbe
not2370RBnot
just2371RBjust
that2372IN/thatthat
the2373DTthe
information2374NNinformation
is2375VBZbe
n't2376RBn't
out2377RBout
there2378RBthere
in2379INin
the2380DTthe
world2381NNworld
but2382CCbut
that2383IN/thatthat
you2384PPyou
're2385VBPbe
doing2386VVGdo
something2387NNsomething
to2388TOto
make2389VVmake
sure2390JJsure
that2391IN/thatthat
the2392DTthe
information2393NNinformation
does2394VVZdo
n't2395RBn't
get2396VVget
out2397RPout
there2398RBthere
in2399INin
the2400DTthe
world2401NNworld
.2402SENT.
So2403CCso
which2404WDTwhich
do2405VVPdo
you2406PPyou
think2407VVPthink
is2408VBZbe
the2409DTthe
right2410JJright
approach2411NNapproach
in2412INin
this2413DTthis
case2414NNcase
?2415SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]2416LOC[MR. YOUNG]
I'll2417NPI'll
...2418:...
I2419PPI
'll2420MDwill
readily2421RBreadily
agree2422VVagree
with2423INwith
the2424DTthe
latter2425NNlatter
.2426SENT.
Our2427PP$our
...2428:...
our2429PP$our
argument2430NNargument
is2431VBZbe
not2432RBnot
that2433IN/thatthat
simply2434RBsimply
marking2435VVGmark
something2436NNsomething
or2437CCor
stamping2438VVGstamp
it2439PPit
confidential2440JJconfidential
does2441VVZdo
the2442DTthe
trick2443NNtrick
.2444SENT.
We2445PPwe
've2446VHPhave
had2447VHNhave
272448CD@card@
years2449NNSyear
with2450INwith
the2451DTthe
D2452NPD
.2453SENT.
C2454LSc
.2455SENT.
Circu2456NPCircu
it2457PPit
's2458VBZbe
critical2459JJcritical
mass2460NNmass
case2461NNcase
,2462,,
which2463WDTwhich
essentially2464RBessentially
adopts2465VVZadopt
the2466DTthe
position2467NNposition
that2468IN/thatthat
we2469PPwe
think2470VVPthink
correctly2471RBcorrectly
defines2472VVZdefine
the2473DTthe
entirety2474NNentirety
of2475INof
Exemption2476NPExemption
42477CD4
.2478SENT.
And2479CCand
in2480INin
critical2481JJcritical
mass2482NNmass
cases2483NNScase
,2484,,
when2485WRBwhen
a2486DTa
party2487NNparty
wants2488VVZwant
the2489DTthe
release2490NNrelease
of2491INof
some2492DTsome
information2493NNinformation
that2494IN/thatthat
a2495DTa
party2496NNparty
like2497INlike
us2498PPus
might2499MDmight
say2500VVsay
that2501DTthat
's2502VBZbe
our2503PP$our
confidential2504JJconfidential
commercial2505JJcommercial
information2506NNinformation
,2507,,
more2508JJRmore
is2509VBZbe
required2510VVNrequire
and2511CCand
you2512PPyou
can2513MDcan
be2514VBbe
held2515VVNhold
to2516TOto
fail2517VVfail
your2518PP$your
Exemption2519NPExemption
42520CD4
argument2521NNargument
if2522INif
you2523PPyou
do2524VVPdo
n't2525RBn't
illustrate2526VVillustrate
how2527WRBhow
you2528PPyou
protect2529VVPprotect
the2530DTthe
information2531NNinformation
.2532SENT.
So2533RBso
,2534,,
for2535INfor
example2536NNexample
,2537,,
what2538WPwhat
is2539VBZbe
relevant2540JJrelevant
and2541CCand
what2542WPwhat
was2543VBDbe
asked2544VVNask
even2545RBeven
in2546INin
this2547DTthis
very2548JJvery
case2549NNcase
,2550,,
in2551RBin
...2552:...
in2553INin
which2554WDTwhich
these2555DTthese
questions2556NNSquestion
were2557VBDbe
presented2558VVNpresent
to2559TOto
the2560DTthe
trial2561NNtrial
court2562NNcourt
,2563,,
do2564VVPdo
you2565PPyou
bind2566VVbind
it2567PPit
with2568INwith
nondisclosure2569NNnondisclosure
agreements2570NNSagreement
?2571SENT?
Do2572VVdo
you2573PPyou
have2574VHPhave
security2575NNsecurity
in2576INin
place2577NNplace
so2578INso
that2579WDTthat
it2580PPit
limits2581VVZlimit
the2582DTthe
number2583NNnumber
of2584INof
people2585NNSpeople
even2586RBeven
internally2587RBinternally
who2588WPwho
have2589VHPhave
access2590NNaccess
to2591TOto
it2592PPit
?2593SENT?
How2594WRBHow
do2595VVPdo
you2596PPyou
make2597VVPmake
sure2598RBsure
that2599IN/thatthat
it2600PPit
is2601VBZbe
not2602RBnot
supplied2603VVNsupply
accidentally2604RBaccidentally
in2605INin
litigation2606NNlitigation
,2607,,
for2608INfor
example2609NNexample
?2610SENT?
How2611WRBHow
,2612,,
in2613INin
other2614JJother
words2615NNSword
,2616,,
do2617VVPdo
you2618PPyou
make2619VVPmake
sure2620RBsure
that2621IN/thatthat
it2622PPit
does2623VVZdo
n't2624RBn't
become2625VVbecome
public2626JJpublic
?2627SENT?
Have2628VHPhave
you2629PPyou
made2630VVNmake
sure2631RBsure
that2632IN/thatthat
comparable2633JJcomparable
information2634NNinformation
has2635VHZhave
not2636RBnot
been2637VBNbe
made2638VVNmake
public2639JJpublic
in2640INin
other2641JJother
forums2642NNSforum
?2643SENT?
And2644CCand
so2645RBso
there2646EXthere
are2647VBPbe
critical2648JJcritical
mass2649JJmass
cases2650NNScase
,2651,,
decisions2652NNSdecision
from2653INfrom
the2654DTthe
D2655NPD
.2656SENT.
C2657LSc
.2658SENT.
Circuit2659NNcircuit
courts2660NNScourt
and2661CCand
from2662INfrom
the2663DTthe
Tenth2664JJtenth
Circuit2665NNcircuit
courts2666NNScourt
that2667WDTthat
apply2668VVPapply
that2669IN/thatthat
,2670,,
that2671WDTthat
look2672VVPlook
to2673TOto
those2674DTthose
exact2675JJexact
types2676NNStype
of2677INof
questions2678NNSquestion
and2679CCand
say2680VVPsay
:2681::
Well2682UHWell
,2683,,
we2684PPwe
can2685MDcan
find2686VVfind
something2687NNsomething
rather2688RBrather
like2689INlike
this2690DTthis
in2691INin
publicly2692RBpublicly
available2693JJavailable
information2694NNinformation
already2695RBalready
.2696SENT.
Your2697PP$your
Exemption2698NPExemption
42699CD4
argument2700NNargument
is2701VBZbe
gone2702VVNgo
.2703SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2704LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So2705RBso
how2706WRBhow
does2707VVZdo
that2708DTthat
dovetail2709NNdovetail
with2710INwith
the2711DTthe
SG2712NPSG
's2713POS's
position2714NNposition
that2715IN/thatthat
if2716INif
they2717PPthey
ask2718VVPask
you2719PPyou
to2720TOto
turn2721VVturn
over2722INover
something2723NNsomething
confidentially2724RBconfidentially
...2725:...
and2726CCand
you2727PPyou
seemed2728VVDseem
to2729TOto
be2730VBbe
arguing2731VVGargue
that2732IN/thatthat
earlier2733RBRearlier
...2734:...
that2735IN/thatthat
that2736DTthat
's2737VBZbe
enough2738RBenough
,2739,,
that2740IN/thatthat
that2741WDTthat
makes2742VVZmake
it2743PPit
confidential2744JJconfidential
?2745SENT?
Because2746INbecause
you2747PPyou
've2748VHPhave
just2749RBjust
said2750VVNsay
to2751TOto
me2752PPme
something2753NNsomething
quite2754RBquite
different2755JJdifferent
,2756,,
which2757WDTwhich
is2758VBZbe
it2759PPit
's2760VBZbe
not2761RBnot
the2762DTthe
government2763NNgovernment
's2764POS's
request2765NNrequest
or2766CCor
promise2767NNpromise
to2768TOto
keep2769VVkeep
it2770PPit
confidential2771JJconfidential
,2772,,
but2773CCbut
is2774VBZbe
it2775PPit
,2776,,
in2777INin
fact2778NNfact
,2779,,
kept2780VVNkeep
in2781INin
confidence2782NNconfidence
the2783DTthe
way2784NNway
you2785PPyou
've2786VHPhave
defined2787VVNdefine
it2788PPit
?2789SENT?
So2790RBso
how2791WRBhow
do2792VVPdo
you2793PPyou
dovetail2794VVdovetail
the2795DTthe
two2796CDtwo
?2797SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]2798LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well2799UHwell
,2800,,
I2801PPI
would2802MDwould
say2803VVsay
that2804IN/thatthat
even2805RBeven
if2806INif
the2807DTthe
government2808NNgovernment
gives2809VVZgive
us2810PPus
a2811DTa
promise2812NNpromise
of2813INof
confidentiality2814NNconfidentiality
,2815,,
that2816WDTthat
fits2817VVZfit
within2818INwithin
the2819DTthe
definition2820NNdefinition
of2821INof
what2822WPwhat
confidential2823JJconfidential
is2824VBZbe
,2825,,
we2826PPwe
now2827RBnow
have2828VHPhave
given2829VVNgive
something2830NNsomething
to2831TOto
the2832DTthe
government2833NNgovernment
in2834INin
confidence2835NNconfidence
,2836,,
if2837INif
we2838PPwe
,2839,,
nonetheless2840RBnonetheless
,2841,,
publish2842VVpublish
it2843PPit
,2844,,
if2845INif
we2846PPwe
're2847VBPbe
sloppy2848JJsloppy
with2849INwith
it2850PPit
,2851,,
if2852INif
we2853PPwe
release2854VVPrelease
it2855PPit
in2856INin
some2857DTsome
other2858JJother
way2859NNway
,2860,,
then2861RBthen
we2862PPwe
have2863VHPhave
breached2864VVNbreach
the2865DTthe
confidentiality2866NNconfidentiality
ourselves2867PPourselves
.2868SENT.
And2869CCand
I2870PPI
would2871MDwould
argue2872VVargue
that2873DTthat
someone2874NNsomeone
like2875INlike
that2876WDTthat
is2877VBZbe
no2878RBno
longer2879RBRlonger
protected2880VVNprotect
by2881INby
...2882:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2883LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
How2884WRBHow
about2885INabout
the2886DTthe
...2887:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2888LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So2889INso
the2890DTthe
government2891NNgovernment
's2892POS's
overlay2893NNoverlay
is2894VBZbe
really2895RBreally
not2896RBnot
necessary2897JJnecessary
to2898TOto
this2899DTthis
case2900NNcase
?2901SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]2902LOC[MR. YOUNG]
It2903PPit
's2904VBZbe
a2905DTa
manifestation2906NNmanifestation
of2907INof
what2908WPwhat
confidential2909JJconfidential
is2910VBZbe
.2911SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2912LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Man2913NNman
...2914:...
but2915CCbut
only2916RBonly
a2917DTa
point2918NNpoint
of2919INof
evidence2920NNevidence
,2921,,
not2922RBnot
a2923DTa
point2924NNpoint
that2925WDTthat
binds2926VVZbind
?2927SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]2928LOC[MR. YOUNG]
I2929PPI
...2930:...
I2931PPI
guess2932VVPguess
.2933SENT.
I2934PPI
'm2935VBPbe
not2936RBnot
sure2937JJsure
what2938WPwhat
a2939DTa
point2940NNpoint
of2941INof
evidence2942NNevidence
means2943NNSmean
.2944SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2945LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Meaning2946NNmeaning
,2947,,
you2948PPyou
say2949VVPsay
a2950DTa
manifestation2951NNmanifestation
,2952,,
that2953IN/thatthat
a2954DTa
district2955NNdistrict
court2956NNcourt
judge2957NNjudge
could2958MDcould
look2959VVlook
at2960INat
that2961IN/thatthat
as2962RBas
among2963INamong
many2964JJmany
factors2965NNSfactor
.2966SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]2967LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Yes2968NPYes
,2969,,
I2970PPI
...2971:...
I2972PPI
would2973MDwould
say2974VVsay
that2975IN/thatthat
if2976INif
the2977DTthe
government2978NNgovernment
in2979INin
a2980DTa
proper2981JJproper
form2982NNform
,2983,,
if2984INif
the2985DTthe
government2986NNgovernment
binds2987VVZbind
itself2988PPitself
here2989RBhere
through2990INthrough
notice-and-comment2991NNnotice-and-comment
rulemaking2992VVGrulemak
...2993:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2994LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
If2995INif
you2996PPyou
...2997:...
if2998INif
you2999PPyou
leave3000VVPleave
...3001:...
if3002INif
you3003PPyou
give3004VVPgive
this3005DTthis
information3006NNinformation
to3007TOto
your3008PP$your
employees3009NNSemployee
,3010,,
there3011EXthere
's3012VBZbe
no3013DTno
promise3014NNpromise
of3015INof
secrecy3016NNsecrecy
and3017CCand
...3018:...
[MR. YOUNG]3019LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well3020UHWell
,3021,,
Landano3022NPLandano
defined3023VVNdefine
what3024WPwhat
confidential3025JJconfidential
meant3026VVNmean
also3027RBalso
,3028,,
and3029CCand
it3030PPit
recognized3031VVDrecognize
that3032DTthat
confidential3033JJconfidential
does3034VVZdo
not3035RBnot
mean3036VVmean
that3037DTthat
nobody3038NNnobody
knows3039VVZknow
it3040PPit
.3041SENT.
It3042PPit
means3043VVZmean
that3044IN/thatthat
you3045PPyou
have3046VHPhave
to3047TOto
keep3048VVkeep
it3049PPit
within3050INwithin
a3051DTa
limited3052JJlimited
universe3053NNuniverse
.3054SENT.
Mr3055NPMr
.3056SENT.
Chief3057NPChief
Justice3058NPJustice
,3059,,
if3060INif
I3061PPI
may3062MDmay
reserve3063VVreserve
the3064DTthe
balance3065NNbalance
of3066INof
my3067PP$my
time3068NNtime
.3069SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3070LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank3071VVthank
you3072PPyou
,3073,,
counsel3074NNcounsel
.3075SENT.
Mr3076NPMr
.3077SENT.
Yang3078NPYang
.3079SENT.
[MR. YANG]3080LOC[MR. YANG]
Mr3081NPMr
.3082SENT.
Chief3083NPChief
Justice3084NPJustice
,3085,,
and3086CCand
may3087MDmay
it3088PPit
please3089VVplease
the3090DTthe
Court3091NPCourt
:3092::
Before3093INbefore
I3094PPI
address3095VVPaddress
the3096DTthe
merits3097NNSmerit
,3098,,
I3099PPI
'd3100MDwould
briefly3101RBbriefly
like3102VVlike
to3103TOto
address3104VVaddress
justiciability3105NNjusticiability
and3106CCand
be3107VBbe
clear3108JJclear
:3109::
The3110DTthe
government3111NNgovernment
will3112MDwill
not3113RBnot
release3114VVrelease
the3115DTthe
disputed3116JJdisputed
records3117NNSrecord
from3118INfrom
20053119CD@card@
to3120TOto
20103121CD@card@
if3122INif
a3123DTa
FOIA3124NPFOIA
exemption3125NNexemption
applies3126VVZapply
.3127SENT.
So3128RBso
long3129RBlong
as3130INas
the3131DTthe
government3132NNgovernment
is3133VBZbe
not3134RBnot
judicially3135RBjudicially
compelled3136VVNcompel
to3137TOto
do3138VVdo
so3139RBso
,3140,,
it3141PPit
will3142MDwill
not3143RBnot
do3144VVdo
so3145RBso
.3146SENT.
Petitioner3147NNpetitioner
also3148RBalso
had3149VHDhave
Article3150NPArticle
III3151NPIII
standing3152NNstanding
.3153SENT.
That3154DTthat
's3155VBZbe
evaluated3156VVNevaluate
at3157INat
the3158DTthe
time3159NNtime
they3160PPthey
filed3161VVDfile
the3162DTthe
notice3163NNnotice
of3164INof
appeal3165NNappeal
and3166CCand
invoked3167VVDinvoke
the3168DTthe
appellate3169JJappellate
court3170NNcourt
's3171POS's
jurisdiction3172NNjurisdiction
.3173SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]3174LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Is3175VBZbe
that3176IN/thatthat
true3177JJtrue
if3178INif
...3179:...
if3180INif
the3181DTthe
...3182:...
the3183DTthe
other3184JJother
statute3185NNstatute
here3186RBhere
were3187VBDbe
held3188VVNhold
not3189RBnot
to3190TOto
block3191VVblock
the3192DTthe
government3193NNgovernment
from3194INfrom
releasing3195VVGrelease
it3196PPit
?3197SENT?
[MR. YANG]3198LOC[MR. YANG]
Yes3199NPYes
.3200SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]3201LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
You3202PPyou
mean3203VVPmean
so3204RBso
however3205RBhowever
the3206DTthe
other3207JJother
statute3208NNstatute
comes3209VVZcome
out3210RPout
,3211,,
the3212DTthe
government3213NNgovernment
now3214RBnow
is3215VBZbe
saying3216VVGsay
...3217:...
I3218PPI
did3219VVDdo
n't3220RBn't
get3221VVget
this3222DTthis
at3223INat
the3224DTthe
beginning3225NNbeginning
...3226:...
we3227PPwe
're3228VBPbe
not3229RBnot
going3230VVGgo
to3231TOto
release3232VVrelease
it3233PPit
...3234:...
even3235RBeven
if3236INif
we3237PPwe
have3238VHPhave
every3239DTevery
right3240NNright
to3241TOto
release3242VVrelease
it3243PPit
,3244,,
we3245PPwe
're3246VBPbe
not3247RBnot
going3248VVGgo
to3249TOto
release3250VVrelease
it3251PPit
,3252,,
even3253RBeven
if3254INif
we3255PPwe
have3256VHPhave
every3257DTevery
right3258NNright
to3259TOto
do3260VVdo
so3261RBso
?3262SENT?
[MR. YANG]3263LOC[MR. YANG]
It3264PPit
would3265MDwould
help3266VVhelp
to3267TOto
take3268VVtake
a3269DTa
look3270NNlook
at3271INat
Footnote3272NNfootnote
53273CD5
...3274:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3275LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah3276NPYeah
.3277SENT.
[MR. YANG]3278LOC[MR. YANG]
...3279:...
at3280INat
page3281NNpage
263282CD@card@
of3283INof
our3284PP$our
brief3285NNbrief
,3286,,
where3287WRBwhere
we3288PPwe
explain3289VVPexplain
...3290:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3291LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah3292NPYeah
.3293SENT.
[MR. YANG]3294LOC[MR. YANG]
...3295:...
there3296EXthere
would3297MDwould
...3298:...
there3299EXthere
is3300VBZbe
a3301DTa
policy3302NNpolicy
interest3303NNinterest
in3304INin
USDA3305NPUSDA
,3306,,
if3307INif
they3308PPthey
were3309VBDbe
writing3310VVGwrite
on3311INon
a3312DTa
clean3313JJclean
slate3314NNslate
,3315,,
going3316VVGgo
prospectively3317RBprospectively
,3318,,
that3319IN/thatthat
they3320PPthey
may3321MDmay
well3322RBwell
release3323VVrelease
this3324DTthis
information3325NNinformation
and3326CCand
they3327PPthey
said3328VVDsay
they3329PPthey
likely3330RBlikely
would3331MDwould
.3332SENT.
However3333RBhowever
,3334,,
as3335INas
we3336PPwe
explain3337VVPexplain
in3338INin
Footnote3339NNfootnote
53340CD5
,3341,,
we3342PPwe
said3343VVDsay
,3344,,
if3345INif
Congress3346NPCongress
had3347VHDhave
not3348RBnot
amended3349VVNamend
Section3350NPSection
20183351CD@card@
,3352,,
so3353INso
that3354WDTthat
's3355VBZbe
an3356DTan
if3357INif
...3358:...
the3359DTthe
agency3360NNagency
might3361MDmight
have3362VHhave
explored3363VVNexplore
changing3364VVGchange
its3365PP$its
position3366NNposition
.3367SENT.
It3368PPit
has3369VHZhave
not3370RBnot
changed3371VVNchange
its3372PP$its
position3373NNposition
,3374,,
one3375CDone
.3376SENT.
Two3377CDTwo
,3378,,
and3379CCand
then3380RBthen
we3381PPwe
go3382VVPgo
on3383INon
to3384TOto
say3385VVsay
,3386,,
to3387TOto
release3388VVrelease
store-level3389JJstore-level
redemption3390NNredemption
data3391NNSdatum
collected3392VVNcollect
after3393INafter
such3394PDTsuch
a3395DTa
change3396NNchange
.3397SENT.
In3398INin
other3399JJother
words3400NNSword
,3401,,
the3402DTthe
data3403NNSdatum
collected3404VVNcollect
before3405INbefore
the3406DTthe
change3407NNchange
when3408WRBwhen
we3409PPwe
have3410VHPhave
provided3411VVNprovide
an3412DTan
assurance3413NNassurance
of3414INof
confidentiality3415NNconfidentiality
,3416,,
in3417INin
notice-and-comment3418NNnotice-and-comment
rulemaking3419VVGrulemak
go3420NNgo
back3421RBback
...3422:...
going3423VVGgo
back3424RBback
403425CD@card@
years3426NNSyear
,3427,,
the3428DTthe
government3429NNgovernment
is3430VBZbe
not3431RBnot
voluntarily3432RBvoluntarily
releasing3433VVGrelease
that3434IN/thatthat
on3435INon
the3436DTthe
basis3437NNbasis
of3438INof
having3439VHGhave
to3440TOto
do3441VVdo
so3442RBso
.3443SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]3444LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I3445PPI
know3446VVPknow
,3447,,
but3448CCbut
you3449PPyou
sounded3450VVDsound
in3451INin
that3452DTthat
footnote3453NNfootnote
as3454RBas
if3455INif
you3456PPyou
were3457VBDbe
saying3458VVGsay
that3459IN/thatthat
the3460DTthe
reason3461NNreason
we3462PPwe
're3463VBPbe
not3464RBnot
releasing3465VVGrelease
it3466PPit
is3467VBZbe
because3468INbecause
of3469INof
new3470JJnew
20183471CD@card@
.3472SENT.
[MR. YANG]3473LOC[MR. YANG]
Well3474UHWell
,3475,,
the3476DTthe
reason3477NNreason
we3478PPwe
're3479VBPbe
not3480RBnot
releasing3481VVGrelease
anything3482NNanything
,3483,,
whether3484INwhether
before3485INbefore
or3486CCor
after3487INafter
...3488:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3489LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No3490NPNo
,3491,,
but3492CCbut
just3493RBjust
answer3494VVanswer
...3495:...
look3496VVlook
at3497INat
my3498PP$my
...3499:...
look3500VVlook
at3501INat
my3502PP$my
question3503NNquestion
.3504SENT.
I3505PPI
'm3506VBPbe
trying3507VVGtry
to3508TOto
figure3509VVfigure
out3510RPout
whether3511INwhether
I3512PPI
have3513VHPhave
a3514DTa
question3515NNquestion
here3516RBhere
.3517SENT.
[MR. YANG]3518LOC[MR. YANG]
Right3519NPRight
.3520SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]3521LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And3522CCand
...3523:...
and3524CCand
if3525INif
...3526:...
if3527INif
you3528PPyou
're3529VBPbe
going3530VVGgo
to3531TOto
tell3532VVtell
me3533PPme
I3534PPI
do3535VVPdo
n't3536RBn't
care3537VVcare
if3538INif
20183539CD@card@
never3540RBnever
appeared3541VVNappear
,3542,,
does3543VVZdo
n't3544RBn't
appear3545VVappear
,3546,,
does3547VVZdo
n't3548RBn't
exist3549VVexist
,3550,,
we3551PPwe
still3552RBstill
won3553MDwill
't3554RB't
release3555VVrelease
it3556PPit
,3557,,
which3558WDTwhich
is3559VBZbe
your3560PP$your
right3561NNright
in3562INin
the3563DTthe
absence3564NNabsence
of3565INof
...3566:...
of3567INof
...3568:...
[MR. YANG]3569LOC[MR. YANG]
I3570PPI
would3571MDwould
say3572VVsay
that3573DTthat
's3574VBZbe
partially3575RBpartially
right3576JJright
.3577SENT.
The3578DTthe
reason3579NNreason
we3580PPwe
're3581VBPbe
not3582RBnot
releasing3583VVGrelease
it3584PPit
is3585VBZbe
because3586INbecause
we3587PPwe
have3588VHPhave
made3589VVNmake
assurances3590NNSassurance
of3591INof
confidentiality3592NNconfidentiality
at3593INat
pages3594NNSpage
303595CD@card@
to3596TOto
313597CD@card@
of3598INof
our3599PP$our
brief3600NNbrief
.3601SENT.
We3602PPwe
explained3603VVDexplain
that3604IN/thatthat
that3605WDTthat
was3606VBDbe
motivated3607VVNmotivate
by3608INby
Section3609NPSection
20183610CD@card@
(3611((
c3612LSc
)3613))
.3614SENT.
But3615CCbut
even3616RBeven
if3617INif
we3618PPwe
were3619VBDbe
...3620:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3621LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
All3622DTall
right3623NNright
.3624SENT.
So3625RBso
what3626WPwhat
happens3627VVZhappen
if3628INif
20183629CD@card@
(3630((
c3631LSc
)3632))
now3633RBnow
is3634VBZbe
wiped3635VVNwipe
from3636INfrom
the3637DTthe
books3638NNSbook
?3639SENT?
[MR. YANG]3640LOC[MR. YANG]
As3641INas
I3642PPI
was3643VBDbe
explaining3644VVGexplain
...3645:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3646LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Will3647MDwill
you3648PPyou
release3649VVrelease
it3650PPit
?3651SENT?
[MR. YANG]3652LOC[MR. YANG]
As3653INas
I3654PPI
was3655VBDbe
...3656:...
no3657UHno
.3658SENT.
As3659INas
I3660PPI
was3661VBDbe
explaining3662VVGexplain
...3663:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]3664LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No3665NPNo
?3666SENT?
Okay3667JJokay
.3668SENT.
[MR. YANG]3669LOC[MR. YANG]
...3670:...
on3671INon
page3672NNpage
303673CD@card@
to3674TOto
313675CD@card@
of3676INof
our3677PP$our
brief3678NNbrief
,3679,,
even3680RBeven
if3681INif
we3682PPwe
were3683VBDbe
wrong3684JJwrong
about3685INabout
20183686CD@card@
(3687((
c3688LSc
)3689))
,3690,,
the3691DTthe
fact3692NNfact
that3693IN/thatthat
it3694PPit
was3695VBDbe
reasonable3696JJreasonable
,3697,,
it3698PPit
was3699VBDbe
objectively3700RBobjectively
reasonable3701JJreasonable
in3702INin
light3703NNlight
of3704INof
the3705DTthe
government3706NNgovernment
's3707POS's
assurances3708NNSassurance
for3709INfor
403710CD@card@
years3711NNSyear
to3712TOto
understand3713VVunderstand
the3714DTthe
government3715NNgovernment
to3716TOto
be3717VBbe
providing3718VVGprovide
an3719DTan
assurance3720NNassurance
of3721INof
confidentiality3722NNconfidentiality
,3723,,
and3724CCand
we3725PPwe
understand3726VVPunderstand
these3727DTthese
retailers3728NNSretailer
to3729TOto
have3730VHhave
done3731VVNdo
so3732RBso
,3733,,
to3734TOto
be3735VBbe
relying3736VVGrely
on3737INon
that3738DTthat
...3739:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]3740LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Mr3741NPMr
.3742SENT.
Yang3743NPYang
,3744,,
let3745VVDlet
me3746PPme
see3747VVPsee
63748CD6
if3749INif
...3750:...
[MR. YANG]3751LOC[MR. YANG]
...3752:...
we3753PPwe
're3754VBPbe
not3755RBnot
going3756VVGgo
to3757TOto
release3758VVrelease
it3759PPit
as3760INas
a3761DTa
matter3762NNmatter
of3763INof
good3764JJgood
government3765NNgovernment
.3766SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3767LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Mr3768NPMr
.3769SENT.
Yang3770NPYang
,3771,,
you3772PPyou
are3773VBPbe
going3774VVGgo
to3775TOto
tell3776VVtell
me3777PPme
that3778IN/thatthat
you3779PPyou
were3780VBDbe
going3781VVGgo
to3782TOto
be3783VBbe
in3784INin
contempt3785NNcontempt
on3786INon
the3787DTthe
order3788NNorder
below3789RBbelow
?3790SENT?
[MR. YANG]3791LOC[MR. YANG]
Of3792INof
course3793NNcourse
not3794RBnot
.3795SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3796LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
The3797DTthe
order3798NNorder
below3799RBbelow
,3800,,
you3801PPyou
litigated3802VVDlitigate
Exemption3803NPExemption
33804CD3
.3805SENT.
[MR. YANG]3806LOC[MR. YANG]
Of3807INof
course3808NNcourse
not3809RBnot
.3810SENT.
If3811INif
we3812PPwe
were3813VBDbe
...3814:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3815LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
The3816DTthe
court3817NNcourt
...3818:...
the3819DTthe
court3820NNcourt
...3821:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]3822LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Could3823MDcould
I3824PPI
hear3825VVhear
his3826PP$his
answer3827NNanswer
,3828,,
please3829UHplease
?3830SENT?
[MR. YANG]3831LOC[MR. YANG]
Of3832INof
course3833NNcourse
not3834RBnot
.3835SENT.
If3836INif
we3837PPwe
were3838VBDbe
compelled3839VVNcompel
to3840TOto
do3841VVdo
so3842RBso
by3843INby
a3844DTa
court3845NNcourt
,3846,,
we3847PPwe
will3848MDwill
do3849VVdo
so3850RBso
.3851SENT.
But3852CCbut
if3853INif
we3854PPwe
have3855VHPhave
discretion3856NNdiscretion
to3857TOto
do3858VVdo
so3859RBso
...3860:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3861LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But3862CCbut
wait3863VVwait
a3864DTa
minute3865NNminute
,3866,,
there3867EXthere
is3868VBZbe
no3869DTno
discretion3870NNdiscretion
.3871SENT.
Let3872VVlet
's3873VBZbe
assume3874VVassume
there3875EXthere
's3876VBZbe
no3877DTno
20183878CD@card@
(3879((
c3880LSc
)3881))
amendment3882NNamendment
.3883SENT.
You3884PPyou
litigated3885VVDlitigate
Exemption3886NPExemption
33887CD3
.3888SENT.
You3889PPyou
lost3890VVDlose
.3891SENT.
You3892PPyou
litigated3893VVDlitigate
Exemption3894NPExemption
43895CD4
.3896SENT.
You3897PPyou
lost3898VVDlose
.3899SENT.
[MR. YANG]3900LOC[MR. YANG]
I3901PPI
...3902:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3903LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
You3904PPyou
were3905VBDbe
ordered3906VVNorder
to3907TOto
disclose3908VVdisclose
...3909:...
[MR. YANG]3910LOC[MR. YANG]
I3911PPI
think3912VVPthink
there3913EXthere
's3914VBZbe
some3915DTsome
confusion3916NNconfusion
in3917INin
the3918DTthe
question3919NNquestion
.3920SENT.
20183921CD@card@
(3922((
c3923LSc
)3924))
prohibits3925VVZprohibit
the3926DTthe
government3927NNgovernment
from3928INfrom
releasing3929VVGrelease
.3930SENT.
It3931PPit
does3932VVZdo
not3933RBnot
...3934:...
so3935RBso
,3936,,
if3937INif
20183938CD@card@
(3939((
c3940LSc
)3941))
is3942VBZbe
taken3943VVNtake
off3944INoff
the3945DTthe
table3946NNtable
,3947,,
we3948PPwe
still3949RBstill
have3950VHPhave
discretion3951NNdiscretion
.3952SENT.
And3953CCand
we3954PPwe
are3955VBPbe
exercising3956VVGexercise
our3957PP$our
discretion3958NNdiscretion
in3959INin
a3960DTa
matter3961NNmatter
of3962INof
good3963JJgood
government3964NNgovernment
.3965SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3966LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
No3967NPNo
,3968,,
but3969CCbut
I3970PPI
'm3971VBPbe
sorry3972JJsorry
,3973,,
but3974CCbut
once3975RBonce
you3976PPyou
did3977VVDdo
n't3978RBn't
...3979:...
[MR. YANG]3980LOC[MR. YANG]
The3981DTthe
Court3982NPCourt
has3983VHZhave
repeated3984VVNrepeat
...3985:...
the3986DTthe
Court3987NNcourt
recognized3988VVNrecognize
in3989INin
a3990DTa
...3991:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3992LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...3993:...
once3994RBonce
you3995PPyou
did3996VVDdo
n't3997RBn't
appeal3998VVappeal
...3999:...
forget4000VVforget
about4001INabout
the4002DTthe
amendment4003NNamendment
...4004:...
you4005PPyou
did4006VVDdo
n't4007RBn't
appeal4008VVappeal
,4009,,
would4010MDwould
you4011PPyou
have4012VHPhave
had4013VHDhave
to4014TOto
turn4015VVturn
over4016INover
the4017DTthe
material4018NNmaterial
?4019SENT?
[MR. YANG]4020LOC[MR. YANG]
No4021NPNo
.4022SENT.
So4023RBso
long4024RBlong
as4025INas
a4026DTa
party4027NNparty
is4028VBZbe
appealing4029VVGappeal
...4030:...
a4031DTa
party4032NNparty
,4033,,
they4034PPthey
became4035VVDbecome
a4036DTa
party4037NNparty
,4038,,
is4039VBZbe
appealing4040VVGappeal
.4041SENT.
This4042DTthis
is4043VBZbe
an4044DTan
indivisible4045JJindivisible
judgment4046NNjudgment
.4047SENT.
It4048PPit
's4049VBZbe
not4050RBnot
like4051INlike
a4052DTa
money4053NNmoney
judgment4054NNjudgment
that4055IN/thatthat
they4056PPthey
say4057VVPsay
the4058DTthe
government4059NNgovernment
owes4060VVZowe
$4061$$
54062CD5
and4063CCand
party4064NNparty
A4065DTa
owes4066VVZowe
$4067$$
104068CD@card@
,4069,,
and4070CCand
if4071INif
the4072DTthe
government4073NNgovernment
owes4074VVZowe
...4075:...
you4076PPyou
know4077VVPknow
,4078,,
does4079VVZdo
n't4080RBn't
appeal4081VVappeal
,4082,,
it4083PPit
's4084VBZbe
going4085VVGgo
to4086TOto
owe4087VVowe
$4088$$
54089CD5
.4090SENT.
This4091DTthis
is4092VBZbe
the4093DTthe
same4094JJsame
thing4095NNthing
.4096SENT.
Any4097DTany
party4098NNparty
can4099MDcan
bring4100VVbring
that4101IN/thatthat
up4102RBup
,4103,,
and4104CCand
if4105INif
the4106DTthe
judgment4107NNjudgment
below4108INbelow
requiring4109VVGrequire
the4110DTthe
government4111NNgovernment
and4112CCand
the4113DTthe
general4114JJgeneral
disclosure4115NNdisclosure
is4116VBZbe
taken4117VVNtake
off4118INoff
the4119DTthe
books4120NNSbook
,4121,,
we4122PPwe
're4123VBPbe
no4124RBno
longer4125RBRlonger
bound4126JJbound
.4127SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4128LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Perhaps4129RBperhaps
in4130INin
your4131PP$your
remaining4132VVGremain
time4133NNtime
you4134PPyou
could4135MDcould
turn4136VVturn
to4137TOto
the4138DTthe
merits4139NNSmerit
.4140SENT.
[MR. YANG]4141LOC[MR. YANG]
Sure4142NPSure
.4143SENT.
We4144PPwe
believe4145VVPbelieve
that4146IN/thatthat
the4147DTthe
information4148NNinformation
here4149RBhere
is4150VBZbe
...4151:...
the4152DTthe
store-level4153JJstore-level
redemption4154NNredemption
data4155NNSdatum
is4156VBZbe
confidential4157JJconfidential
because4158INbecause
it4159PPit
's4160VBZbe
reasonably4161RBreasonably
understood4162VVNunderstand
in4163INin
context4164NNcontext
to4165TOto
have4166VHhave
been4167VBNbe
communicated4168VVNcommunicate
in4169INin
confidence4170NNconfidence
and4171CCand
held4172JJheld
secret4173NNsecret
.4174SENT.
Now4175RBnow
the4176DTthe
government4177NNgovernment
has4178VHZhave
had4179VHNhave
404180CD@card@
years4181NNSyear
of4182INof
express4183JJexpress
assurances4184NNSassurance
of4185INof
confidentiality4186NNconfidentiality
embodied4187VVNembody
in4188INin
regulations4189NNSregulation
and4190CCand
in4191INin
an4192DTan
ongoing4193JJongoing
dialogue4194NNdialogue
with4195INwith
Congress4196NPCongress
about4197INabout
these4198DTthese
regulations4199NNSregulation
,4200,,
showing4201VVGshow
that4202IN/thatthat
the4203DTthe
store4204NNstore
redemption4205NNredemption
data4206NNSdatum
was4207VBDbe
communicated4208VVNcommunicate
in4209INin
confidence4210NNconfidence
because4211INbecause
we4212PPwe
would4213MDwould
not4214RBnot
disclose4215VVdisclose
it4216PPit
.4217SENT.
The4218DTthe
first4219JJfirst
...4220:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]4221LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
May4222MDmay
I4223PPI
ask4224VVask
you4225PPyou
...4226:...
may4227MDmay
I4228PPI
ask4229VVask
you4230PPyou
the4231DTthe
same4232JJsame
question4233NNquestion
...4234:...
[MR. YANG]4235LOC[MR. YANG]
Sure4236NPSure
.4237SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]4238LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...4239:...
that4240IN/thatthat
I4241PPI
asked4242VVDask
your4243PP$your
fellow4244JJfellow
counsel4245NNcounsel
?4246SENT?
That4247DTthat
is4248VBZbe
,4249,,
one4250CDone
of4251INof
the4252DTthe
aims4253NNSaim
of4254INof
FOIA4255NPFOIA
was4256VBDbe
to4257TOto
...4258:...
FOIA4259NPFOIA
was4260VBDbe
to4261TOto
make4262VVmake
information4263NNinformation
public4264NNpublic
despite4265INdespite
official4266NNofficial
...4267:...
[MR. YANG]4268LOC[MR. YANG]
Yes4269NPYes
.4270SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]4271LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...4272:...
willingness4273NNwillingness
.4274SENT.
[MR. YANG]4275LOC[MR. YANG]
I4276PPI
...4277:...
I4278PPI
think4279VVPthink
that4280WDTthat
's4281VBZbe
right4282JJright
,4283,,
and4284CCand
that4285DTthat
is4286VBZbe
certainly4287RBcertainly
FOIA4288NPFOIA
's4289POS's
general4290JJgeneral
goal4291NNgoal
,4292,,
but4293CCbut
,4294,,
in4295INin
this4296DTthis
exemption4297NNexemption
,4298,,
it4299PPit
only4300RBonly
targets4301VVZtarget
a4302DTa
particular4303JJparticular
type4304NNtype
of4305INof
information4306NNinformation
,4307,,
not4308RBnot
general4309JJgeneral
.4310SENT.
It4311PPit
is4312VBZbe
information4313NNinformation
that4314WDTthat
is4315VBZbe
private4316JJprivate
information4317NNinformation
,4318,,
it4319PPit
's4320VBZbe
obtained4321VVNobtain
outside4322INoutside
the4323DTthe
government4324NNgovernment
,4325,,
it4326PPit
's4327VBZbe
about4328RBabout
private4329JJprivate
entities4330NNSentity
,4331,,
that4332WDTthat
is4333VBZbe
,4334,,
either4335CCeither
commercial4336JJcommercial
or4337CCor
financial4338JJfinancial
.4339SENT.
And4340CCand
in4341INin
that4342DTthat
narrow4343JJnarrow
ambit4344NNambit
of4345INof
commercial4346JJcommercial
or4347CCor
financial4348JJfinancial
information4349NNinformation
,4350,,
Congress4351NPCongress
made4352VVDmake
the4353DTthe
policy4354NNpolicy
judgment4355NNjudgment
that4356IN/thatthat
when4357WRBwhen
that4358DTthat
is4359VBZbe
reasonably4360RBreasonably
understood4361VVNunderstand
to4362TOto
be4363VBbe
confidential4364JJconfidential
,4365,,
it4366PPit
should4367MDshould
not4368RBnot
be4369VBbe
disclosed4370VVNdisclose
.4371SENT.
Exemption4372NNexemption
...4373:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4374LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
If4375INif
I4376PPI
understand4377VVPunderstand
your4378PP$your
argument4379NNargument
,4380,,
Mr4381NPMr
.4382SENT.
Yang4383NPYang
,4384,,
you4385PPyou
kind4386RBkind
of4387INof
have4388VHPhave
two4389CDtwo
prongs4390NNSprong
,4391,,
two4392CDtwo
ways4393NNSway
of4394INof
saying4395VVGsay
that4396DTthat
something4397NNsomething
is4398VBZbe
confidential4399JJconfidential
.4400SENT.
One4401PPone
is4402VBZbe
just4403RBjust
like4404INlike
Mr4405NPMr
.4406SENT.
Young4407NPYoung
's4408POS's
or4409CCor
something4410NNsomething
like4411INlike
it4412PPit
...4413:...
something4414NNsomething
like4415INlike
it4416PPit
,4417,,
and4418CCand
we4419PPwe
...4420:...
and4421CCand
the4422DTthe
other4423JJother
is4424VBZbe
this4425DTthis
assurances4426NNSassurance
point4427NNpoint
.4428SENT.
Is4429VBZbe
that4430DTthat
right4431NNright
?4432SENT?
[MR. YANG]4433LOC[MR. YANG]
Yes4434NPYes
.4435SENT.
That4436DTthat
...4437:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4438LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Your4439PP$your
...4440:...
[MR. YANG]4441LOC[MR. YANG]
...4442:...
those4443DTthose
are4444VBPbe
manifestations4445NNSmanifestation
.4446SENT.
We4447PPwe
think4448VVPthink
the4449DTthe
...4450:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4451LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Am4452NPAm
I4453PPI
...4454:...
am4455VBPbe
I4456PPI
...4457:...
[MR. YANG]4458LOC[MR. YANG]
...4459:...
meaning4460VVGmean
of4461INof
confidential4462JJconfidential
...4463:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4464LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...4465:...
am4466VBPbe
I4467PPI
...4468:...
am4469VBPbe
I4470PPI
right4471JJright
that4472IN/thatthat
you4473PPyou
're4474VBPbe
relying4475VVGrely
here4476RBhere
on4477INon
the4478DTthe
assurances4479NNSassurance
point4480NNpoint
?4481SENT?
[MR. YANG]4482LOC[MR. YANG]
We4483PPwe
are4484VBPbe
,4485,,
because4486INbecause
we4487PPwe
think4488VVPthink
it4489PPit
's4490VBZbe
a4491DTa
little4492RBlittle
more4493RBRmore
complicated4494JJcomplicated
.4495SENT.
This4496DTthis
is4497VBZbe
,4498,,
in4499INin
our4500PP$our
view4501NNview
,4502,,
an4503DTan
objective4504JJobjective
test4505NNtest
,4506,,
and4507CCand
you4508PPyou
have4509VHPhave
to4510TOto
take4511VVtake
it4512PPit
in4513INin
context4514NNcontext
.4515SENT.
And4516CCand
the4517DTthe
context4518NNcontext
here4519RBhere
is4520VBZbe
more4521RBRmore
complicated4522VVNcomplicate
than4523INthan
a4524DTa
normal4525JJnormal
Exemption4526NPExemption
44527CD4
case4528NNcase
because4529INbecause
the4530DTthe
government4531NNgovernment
's4532POS's
own4533JJown
actions4534NNSaction
of4535INof
paying4536VVGpay
money4537NNmoney
is4538VBZbe
intertwined4539VVNintertwine
closely4540RBclosely
with4541INwith
the4542DTthe
information4543NNinformation
submitted4544VVNsubmit
to4545TOto
it4546PPit
,4547,,
which4548WDTwhich
is4549VBZbe
why4550WRBwhy
we4551PPwe
think4552VVPthink
the4553DTthe
easier4554JJReasy
path4555NNpath
in4556INin
this4557DTthis
context4558NNcontext
is4559VBZbe
to4560TOto
...4561:...
where4562WRBwhere
there4563EXthere
has4564VHZhave
been4565VBNbe
404566CD@card@
years4567NNSyear
of4568INof
notice-and-comment4569NNnotice-and-comment
regulations4570NNSregulation
by4571INby
a4572DTa
high4573JJhigh
,4574,,
high4575JJhigh
level4576NNlevel
of4577INof
government4578NNgovernment
sign-off4579NNsign-off
,4580,,
right4581RBright
,4582,,
this4583DTthis
has4584VHZhave
to4585TOto
be4586VBbe
the4587DTthe
agency4588NNagency
administrator4589NNadministrator
that4590WDTthat
signs4591VVZsign
off4592RPoff
on4593INon
these4594DTthese
,4595,,
that4596RBthat
,4597,,
where4598WRBwhere
it4599PPit
's4600VBZbe
objectively4601RBobjectively
reasonable4602JJreasonable
,4603,,
provides4604VVZprovide
an4605DTan
assurance4606NNassurance
of4607INof
confidentiality4608NNconfidentiality
that4609WDTthat
...4610:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4611LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
When4612WRBwhen
can4613MDcan
...4614:...
when4615WRBwhen
can4616MDcan
it4617PPit
be4618VBbe
deemed4619VVNdeem
confidential4620JJconfidential
as4621INas
a4622DTa
matter4623NNmatter
of4624INof
law4625NNlaw
,4626,,
even4627RBeven
without4628INwithout
such4629JJsuch
assurances4630NNSassurance
?4631SENT?
[MR. YANG]4632LOC[MR. YANG]
I4633PPI
think4634VVPthink
this4635DTthis
confidential4636JJconfidential
question4637NNquestion
ultimately4638RBultimately
is4639VBZbe
a4640DTa
question4641NNquestion
that4642WDTthat
requires4643VVZrequire
factual4644JJfactual
context4645NNcontext
.4646SENT.
You4647PPyou
do4648VVPdo
n't4649RBn't
know4650VVknow
if4651INif
information4652NNinformation
is4653VBZbe
...4654:...
is4655VBZbe
confidential4656JJconfidential
without4657INwithout
understanding4658VVGunderstand
the4659DTthe
context4660NNcontext
in4661INin
which4662WDTwhich
it4663PPit
's4664VBZbe
either4665RBeither
treated4666VVNtreat
public4667NNpublic
...4668:...
in4669INin
the4670DTthe
general4671JJgeneral
sphere4672NNsphere
before4673INbefore
it4674PPit
's4675VBZbe
obtained4676VVNobtain
by4677INby
the4678DTthe
government4679NNgovernment
or4680CCor
understanding4681NNunderstanding
how4682WRBhow
it4683PPit
comes4684VVZcome
into4685INinto
the4686DTthe
government4687NNgovernment
's4688POS's
possession4689NNpossession
.4690SENT.
So4691RBso
there4692EXthere
are4693VBPbe
...4694:...
we4695PPwe
think4696VVPthink
as4697INas
a4698DTa
matter4699NNmatter
of4700INof
law4701NNlaw
...4702:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4703LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Can4704MDcan
it4705PPit
...4706:...
can4707MDcan
it4708PPit
be4709VBbe
deemed4710VVNdeem
confidential4711JJconfidential
even4712RBeven
in4713INin
cases4714NNScase
without4715INwithout
government4716NNgovernment
assurance4717NNassurance
?4718SENT?
I4719PPI
'll4720MDwill
ask4721VVask
it4722PPit
a4723DTa
different4724JJdifferent
way4725NNway
.4726SENT.
[MR. YANG]4727LOC[MR. YANG]
Oh4728NPOh
...4729:...
oh4730UHoh
,4731,,
sure4732JJsure
,4733,,
sure4734JJsure
.4735SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4736LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And4737CCand
what4738WPwhat
factors4739NNSfactor
would4740MDwould
determine4741VVdetermine
that4742DTthat
?4743SENT?
[MR. YANG]4744LOC[MR. YANG]
Well4745UHWell
,4746,,
that4747WDTthat
's4748VBZbe
the4749DTthe
first4750JJfirst
manifestation4751NNmanifestation
of4752INof
what4753WPwhat
's4754VBZbe
confidential4755JJconfidential
.4756SENT.
Just4757RBjust
to4758TOto
be4759VBbe
clear4760JJclear
,4761,,
we4762PPwe
think4763VVPthink
...4764:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4765LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And4766CCand
do4767VVPdo
you4768PPyou
have4769VHPhave
any4770DTany
disagreement4771NNdisagreement
with4772INwith
Petitioners4773NNSpetitioner
on4774INon
how4775WRBhow
they4776PPthey
articulate4777VVParticulate
that4778DTthat
first4779JJfirst
...4780:...
[MR. YANG]4781LOC[MR. YANG]
I4782PPI
do4783VVPdo
n't4784RBn't
think4785VVthink
so4786RBso
except4787INexcept
that4788IN/thatthat
we4789PPwe
think4790VVPthink
you4791PPyou
have4792VHPhave
to4793TOto
take4794VVtake
the4795DTthe
full4796JJfull
context4797NNcontext
into4798INinto
account4799NNaccount
.4800SENT.
And4801CCand
when4802WRBwhen
you4803PPyou
do4804VVPdo
that4805IN/thatthat
here4806RBhere
,4807,,
the4808DTthe
inquiry4809NNinquiry
is4810VBZbe
more4811RBRmore
complicated4812JJcomplicated
.4813SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4814LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So4815RBso
,4816,,
as4817INas
I4818PPI
understood4819VVDunderstand
your4820PP$your
brief4821NNbrief
,4822,,
and4823CCand
tell4824VVtell
me4825PPme
if4826INif
I4827PPI
've4828VHPhave
gotten4829VVNget
this4830DTthis
wrong4831JJwrong
,4832,,
you4833PPyou
're4834VBPbe
basically4835RBbasically
saying4836VVGsay
that4837IN/thatthat
the4838DTthe
first4839JJfirst
way4840NNway
of4841INof
showing4842VVGshow
confidentiality4843NNconfidentiality
,4844,,
the4845DTthe
non-assurances4846NNSnon-assurances
way4847NNway
...4848:...
[MR. YANG]4849LOC[MR. YANG]
Right4850NPRight
.4851SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]4852LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...4853:...
is4854VBZbe
n't4855RBn't
really4856RBreally
met4857VVNmeet
here4858RBhere
because4859INbecause
what4860WPwhat
they4861PPthey
're4862VBPbe
seeking4863VVGseek
to4864TOto
protect4865VVprotect
is4866VBZbe
something4867NNsomething
...4868:...
is4869VBZbe
...4870:...
is4871VBZbe
information4872NNinformation
that4873IN/thatthat
essentially4874RBessentially
the4875DTthe
government4876NNgovernment
reveals4877VVZreveal
all4878PDTall
the4879DTthe
time4880NNtime
by4881INby
virtue4882NNvirtue
of4883INof
its4884PP$its
payments4885NNSpayment
.4886SENT.
Is4887VBZbe
that4888IN/thatthat
correct4889JJcorrect
?4890SENT?
[MR. YANG]4891LOC[MR. YANG]
I4892PPI
think4893VVPthink
it4894PPit
's4895VBZbe
close4896JJclose
.4897SENT.
We4898PPwe
're4899VBPbe
a4900DTa
little4901JJlittle
bit4902NNbit
more4903RBRmore
agnostic4904JJagnostic
.4905SENT.
We4906PPwe
think4907VVPthink
that4908IN/thatthat
that4909DTthat
is4910VBZbe
a4911DTa
hard4912JJhard
question4913NNquestion
and4914CCand
we4915PPwe
're4916VBPbe
not4917RBnot
coming4918VVGcome
definitively4919RBdefinitively
down4920RBdown
.4921SENT.
There4922EXthere
are4923VBPbe
some4924DTsome
side4925NNside
questions4926NNSquestion
like4927VVPlike
,4928,,
is4929VBZbe
this4930DTthis
exactly4931RBexactly
what4932WPwhat
the4933DTthe
government4934NNgovernment
is4935VBZbe
doing4936VVGdo
?4937SENT?
How4938WRBHow
close4939NNclose
is4940VBZbe
it4941PPit
?4942SENT?
These4943DTthese
types4944NNStype
of4945INof
nuances4946NNSnuance
,4947,,
I4948PPI
think4949VVPthink
,4950,,
is4951VBZbe
what4952WPwhat
Petitioner4953NNpetitioner
may4954MDmay
be4955VBbe
relying4956VVGrely
on4957INon
.4958SENT.
We4959PPwe
may4960MDmay
have4961VHhave
a4962DTa
small4963JJsmall
disagreement4964NNdisagreement
,4965,,
but4966CCbut
,4967,,
ultimately4968RBultimately
,4969,,
I4970PPI
think4971VVPthink
what4972WPwhat
we4973PPwe
agree4974VVPagree
on4975INon
is4976VBZbe
,4977,,
in4978INin
light4979NNlight
of4980INof
the4981DTthe
404982CD@card@
years4983NNSyear
of4984INof
practice4985NNpractice
that4986WDTthat
has4987VHZhave
occurred4988VVNoccur
here4989RBhere
,4990,,
all4991RBall
we4992PPwe
're4993VBPbe
trying4994VVGtry
to4995TOto
do4996VVdo
is4997VBZbe
live4998VVlive
up4999RPup
to5000TOto
what5001WPwhat
this5002DTthis
Court5003NPCourt
said5004VVDsay
in5005INin
another5006DTanother
FOIA5007NPFOIA
case5008NNcase
,5009,,
CIA5010NPCIA
versus5011CCversus
Sims5012NPSims
,5013,,
that5014WDTthat
great5015JJgreat
nations5016NNSnation
,5017,,
like5018INlike
great5019JJgreat
men5020NNSman
,5021,,
should5022MDshould
keep5023VVkeep
their5024PP$their
word5025NNword
.5026SENT.
And5027CCand
the5028DTthe
government5029NNgovernment
is5030VBZbe
trying5031VVGtry
to5032TOto
keep5033VVkeep
its5034PP$its
word5035NNword
,5036,,
given5037VVNgive
over5038INover
405039CD@card@
years5040NNSyear
in5041INin
the5042DTthe
most5043RBSmost
official5044JJofficial
form5045NNform
possible5046JJpossible
,5047,,
that5048IN/thatthat
we5049PPwe
're5050VBPbe
going5051VVGgo
to5052TOto
keep5053VVkeep
this5054DTthis
information5055NNinformation
confidential5056JJconfidential
.5057SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]5058LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
And5059CCand
this5060DTthis
assurances5061NNSassurance
point5062NNpoint
of5063INof
yours5064PP$yours
,5065,,
does5066VVZdo
it5067PPit
apply5068VVapply
only5069RBonly
when5070WRBwhen
somebody5071NNsomebody
is5072VBZbe
voluntarily5073RBvoluntarily
giving5074VVGgive
information5075NNinformation
to5076TOto
the5077DTthe
government5078NNgovernment
,5079,,
or5080CCor
might5081MDmight
it5082PPit
apply5083VVapply
when5084WRBwhen
somebody5085NNsomebody
is5086VBZbe
mandated5087VVNmandate
to5088TOto
give5089VVgive
information5090NNinformation
to5091TOto
the5092DTthe
government5093NNgovernment
?5094SENT?
[MR. YANG]5095LOC[MR. YANG]
I5096PPI
think5097VVPthink
it5098PPit
...5099:...
it5100PPit
generally5101RBgenerally
applies5102VVZapply
.5103SENT.
Now5104RBnow
you5105PPyou
'd5106MDwould
have5107VHhave
to5108TOto
look5109VVlook
to5110TOto
see5111VVsee
whether5112INwhether
the5113DTthe
government5114NNgovernment
would5115MDwould
have5116VHhave
authority5117NNauthority
to5118TOto
...5119:...
the5120DTthe
agent5121NNagent
...5122:...
the5123DTthe
government5124NNgovernment
official5125NNofficial
has5126VHZhave
...5127:...
have5128VHPhave
authority5129NNauthority
to5130TOto
make5131VVmake
this5132DTthis
assurance5133NNassurance
in5134INin
a5135DTa
way5136NNway
that5137WDTthat
's5138VBZbe
objectively5139RBobjectively
understood5140VVNunderstand
to5141TOto
be5142VBbe
speaking5143VVGspeak
for5144INfor
the5145DTthe
agency5146NNagency
,5147,,
but5148CCbut
it5149PPit
can5150MDcan
apply5151VVapply
potentially5152RBpotentially
in5153INin
both5154DTboth
contexts5155NNScontext
.5156SENT.
There5157EXthere
are5158VBPbe
hard5159JJhard
hypotheticals5160NNShypotheticals
,5161,,
I5162PPI
think5163VVPthink
,5164,,
at5165INat
some5166DTsome
edges5167NNSedge
.5168SENT.
This5169DTthis
case5170NNcase
does5171VVZdo
n't5172RBn't
implicate5173VVimplicate
any5174DTany
of5175INof
them5176PPthem
,5177,,
so5178RBso
I5179PPI
think5180VVPthink
the5181DTthe
Court5182NPCourt
could5183MDcould
just5184RBjust
simply5185RBsimply
cut5186VVNcut
through5187INthrough
the5188DTthe
...5189:...
through5190INthrough
the5191DTthe
...5192:...
the5193DTthe
noise5194NNnoise
and5195CCand
...5196:...
and5197CCand
rule5198VVrule
quite5199RBquite
cleanly5200RBcleanly
here5201RBhere
.5202SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]5203LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Because5204INbecause
...5205:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5206LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Mr5207NPMr
.5208SENT.
Yang5209NPYang
,5210,,
this5211DTthis
is5212VBZbe
...5213:...
this5214DTthis
is5215VBZbe
somewhat5216RBsomewhat
confusing5217JJconfusing
to5218TOto
me5219PPme
.5220SENT.
Exemption5221NNexemption
says5222VVZsay
Congress5223NPCongress
gets5224VVZget
to5225TOto
choose5226VVchoose
what5227WPwhat
should5228MDshould
not5229RBnot
be5230VBbe
disclosed5231VVNdisclose
.5232SENT.
[MR. YANG]5233LOC[MR. YANG]
I5234PPI
...5235:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5236LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
That5237IN/thatthat
it5238PPit
's5239VBZbe
Congress5240NPCongress
's5241POS's
choice5242NNchoice
what5243WPwhat
the5244DTthe
government5245NNgovernment
will5246MDwill
view5247VVview
as5248INas
confidential5249JJconfidential
and5250CCand
not5251RBnot
disclose5252VVdisclose
.5253SENT.
Now5254RBnow
you5255PPyou
're5256VBPbe
bringing5257VVGbring
the5258DTthe
government5259NNgovernment
,5260,,
the5261DTthe
government5262NNgovernment
qua5263INqua
the5264DTthe
executive5265JJexecutive
branch5266NNbranch
,5267,,
into5268INinto
deciding5269VVGdecide
what5270WPwhat
not5271RBnot
to5272TOto
disclose5273VVdisclose
under5274INunder
Exemption5275NPExemption
45276CD4
.5277SENT.
Does5278VVZdo
n't5279RBn't
that5280IN/thatthat
turn5281NNturn
FOIA5282NPFOIA
on5283INon
its5284PP$its
head5285NNhead
?5286SENT?
[MR. YANG]5287LOC[MR. YANG]
No5288NPNo
,5289,,
I5290PPI
think5291VVPthink
you5292PPyou
...5293:...
if5294INif
you5295PPyou
read5296VVPread
back5297RBback
a5298DTa
little5299JJlittle
bit5300NNbit
in5301INin
the5302DTthe
statute5303NNstatute
,5304,,
you5305PPyou
'll5306MDwill
see5307VVsee
that5308IN/thatthat
Congress5309NPCongress
says5310VVZsay
that5311IN/thatthat
FOIA5312NPFOIA
does5313VVZdo
not5314RBnot
apply5315VVapply
if5316INif
any5317DTany
of5318INof
the5319DTthe
exemptions5320NNSexemption
apply5321VVPapply
.5322SENT.
Exemption5323NNexemption
35324CD3
is5325VBZbe
one5326CDone
of5327INof
them5328PPthem
.5329SENT.
It5330PPit
is5331VBZbe
one5332CDone
way5333NNway
,5334,,
but5335CCbut
it5336PPit
is5337VBZbe
an5338DTan
independent5339JJindependent
basis5340NNbasis
when5341WRBwhen
Exemption5342NNexemption
45343CD4
applies5344VVZapply
.5345SENT.
And5346CCand
Exemption5347NPExemption
45348CD4
is5349VBZbe
what5350WPwhat
we5351PPwe
're5352VBPbe
talking5353VVGtalk
about5354RBabout
here5355RBhere
.5356SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]5357LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
So5358RBso
let5359VVlet
's5360VBZbe
go5361VVgo
back5362RBback
.5363SENT.
If5364INif
the5365DTthe
store5366NNstore
does5367VVZdo
not5368RBnot
keep5369VVkeep
it5370PPit
confidential5371JJconfidential
,5372,,
can5373MDcan
you5374PPyou
,5375,,
by5376INby
a5377DTa
promise5378NNpromise
of5379INof
confidentiality5380NNconfidentiality
,5381,,
protect5382VVprotect
it5383PPit
from5384INfrom
FOIA5385NPFOIA
disclosure5386NNdisclosure
?5387SENT?
[MR. YANG]5388LOC[MR. YANG]
I5389PPI
think5390VVPthink
that5391IN/thatthat
would5392MDwould
be5393VBbe
difficult5394JJdifficult
.5395SENT.
The5396DTthe
first5397JJfirst
prong5398NNprong
that5399IN/thatthat
we5400PPwe
are5401VBPbe
...5402:...
rely5403VVrely
upon5404RPupon
is5405VBZbe
...5406:...
the5407DTthe
first5408JJfirst
manifestation5409NNmanifestation
,5410,,
if5411INif
it5412PPit
is5413VBZbe
...5414:...
if5415INif
I5416PPI
could5417MDcould
just5418RBjust
finish5419VVfinish
the5420DTthe
...5421:...
the5422DTthe
sentence5423NNsentence
,5424,,
Mr5425NPMr
.5426SENT.
Chief5427NPChief
Justice5428NPJustice
.5429SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5430LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Yeah5431NPYeah
.5432SENT.
[MR. YANG]5433LOC[MR. YANG]
If5434INif
information5435NNinformation
is5436VBZbe
customarily5437RBcustomarily
not5438RBnot
publicly5439RBpublicly
disclosed5440VVNdisclose
by5441INby
those5442DTthose
who5443WPwho
submit5444VVPsubmit
it5445PPit
,5446,,
so5447RBso
long5448RBlong
as5449INas
there5450EXthere
is5451VBZbe
nothing5452NNnothing
in5453INin
context5454NNcontext
that5455WDTthat
suggests5456VVZsuggest
that5457IN/thatthat
they5458PPthey
would5459MDwould
understand5460VVunderstand
otherwise5461RBotherwise
,5462,,
when5463WRBwhen
it5464PPit
's5465VBZbe
provided5466VVNprovide
to5467TOto
the5468DTthe
government5469NNgovernment
,5470,,
it5471PPit
would5472MDwould
be5473VBbe
confidential5474JJconfidential
.5475SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]5476LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank5477VVthank
you5478PPyou
,5479,,
Mr5480NPMr
.5481SENT.
Yang5482NPYang
.5483SENT.
Mr5484NPMr
.5485SENT.
Loeb5486NPLoeb
.5487SENT.
[MR. LOEB]5488LOC[MR. LOEB]
Mr5489NPMr
.5490SENT.
Chief5491NPChief
Justice5492NPJustice
,5493,,
and5494CCand
may5495MDmay
it5496PPit
please5497VVplease
the5498DTthe
Court5499NPCourt
:5500::
If5501INif
the5502DTthe
Court5503NPCourt
reaches5504VVZreach
the5505DTthe
merits5506NNSmerit
here5507RBhere
,5508,,
it5509PPit
should5510MDshould
affirm5511VVaffirm
the5512DTthe
judgment5513NNjudgment
of5514INof
the5515DTthe
Eighth5516JJeighth
Circuit5517NNcircuit
.5518SENT.
For5519INfor
455520CD@card@
years5521NNSyear
,5522,,
the5523DTthe
language5524NNlanguage
of5525INof
Exemption5526NPExemption
45527CD4
has5528VHZhave
been5529VBNbe
properly5530RBproperly
construed5531VVNconstrue
to5532TOto
require5533VVrequire
a5534DTa
showing5535NNshowing
of5536INof
likely5537JJlikely
competitive5538JJcompetitive
harm5539NNharm
.5540SENT.
Not5541RBnot
only5542RBonly
is5543VBZbe
that5544IN/thatthat
competitive5545JJcompetitive
harm5546NNharm
standard5547NNstandard
fully5548RBfully
supported5549VVNsupport
by5550INby
the5551DTthe
common5552JJcommon
law5553NNlaw
that5554WDTthat
prevailed5555VVDprevail
in5556INin
19665557CD@card@
when5558WRBwhen
Exemption5559NPExemption
45560CD4
was5561VBDbe
enacted5562VVNenact
,5563,,
the5564DTthe
standard5565NNstandard
has5566VHZhave
also5567RBalso
been5568VBNbe
ratified5569VVNratify
by5570INby
Congress5571NPCongress
for5572INfor
reasons5573NNSreason
that5574IN/thatthat
I5575PPI
'll5576MDwill
explain5577VVexplain
.5578SENT.
In5579INin
19745580CD@card@
,5581,,
the5582DTthe
D5583NPD
.5584SENT.
C5585LSc
.5586SENT.
Circuit5587NPCircuit
adopted5588VVDadopt
the5589DTthe
National5590NPNational
Parks5591NPParks
test5592NNtest
with5593INwith
its5594PP$its
two-prong5595NNtwo-prong
test5596NNtest
,5597,,
including5598VVGinclude
the5599DTthe
competitive5600JJcompetitive
harm5601NNharm
requirement5602NNrequirement
.5603SENT.
But5604CCbut
,5605,,
by5606INby
20015607CD@card@
,5608,,
there5609EXthere
was5610VBDbe
a5611DTa
clear5612JJclear
judicial5613JJjudicial
construction5614NNconstruction
.5615SENT.
Eight5616CDEight
circuits5617NNScircuit
had5618VHDhave
adopted5619VVNadopt
the5620DTthe
same5621JJsame
two-prong5622NNtwo-prong
test5623NNtest
as5624INas
National5625NPNational
Parks5626NPParks
.5627SENT.
So5628RBso
,5629,,
between5630INbetween
and5631CCand
today5632NNtoday
,5633,,
during5634INduring
those5635DTthose
185636CD@card@
years5637NNSyear
,5638,,
Congress5639NPCongress
has5640VHZhave
enacted5641VVNenact
295642CD@card@
statutes5643NNSstatute
endorsing5644VVGendorse
the5645DTthe
language5646NNlanguage
of5647INof
and5648CCand
the5649DTthe
provision5650NNprovision
of5651INof
Exemption5652NPExemption
45653CD4
and5654CCand
has5655VHZhave
...5656:...
and5657CCand
has5658VHZhave
effectively5659RBeffectively
amended5660VVNamend
Exemption5661NPExemption
45662CD4
,5663,,
thereby5664RBthereby
ratifying5665VVGratify
the5666DTthe
National5667NPNational
Parks5668NPParks
standard5669NNstandard
.5670SENT.
Now5671RBnow
...5672:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]5673LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Mr5674NPMr
.5675SENT.
Loeb5676NPLoeb
,5677,,
this5678DTthis
case5679NNcase
strikes5680VVZstrike
me5681PPme
as5682INas
a5683DTa
lot5684NNlot
like5685INlike
Milner5686NPMilner
,5687,,
that5688WDTthat
you5689PPyou
have5690VHPhave
a5691DTa
D5692NPD
.5693SENT.
C5694LSc
.5695SENT.
Circuit5696NNcircuit
opinion5697NNopinion
which5698WDTwhich
puts5699VVZput
some5700DTsome
things5701NNSthing
into5702INinto
the5703DTthe
test5704NNtest
that5705IN/thatthat
maybe5706RBmaybe
the5707DTthe
...5708:...
the5709DTthe
statutory5710JJstatutory
text5711NNtext
does5712VVZdo
not5713RBnot
immediately5714RBimmediately
suggest5715VVsuggest
.5716SENT.
And5717CCand
then5718RBthen
there5719EXthere
is5720VBZbe
...5721:...
everybody5722NNeverybody
adopts5723VVZadopt
it5724PPit
,5725,,
you5726PPyou
know5727VVPknow
?5728SENT?
In5729INin
Milner5730NPMilner
too5731RBtoo
,5732,,
all5733PDTall
the5734DTthe
courts5735NNScourt
of5736INof
appeals5737NNSappeal
had5738VHDhave
adopted5739VVNadopt
it5740PPit
.5741SENT.
Congress5742NPCongress
had5743VHDhave
let5744VVNlet
it5745PPit
remain5746VVPremain
on5747INon
the5748DTthe
books5749NNSbook
for5750INfor
quite5751PDTquite
some5752DTsome
time5753NNtime
without5754INwithout
doing5755VVGdo
anything5756NNanything
about5757INabout
it5758PPit
.5759SENT.
Why5760WRBwhy
is5761VBZbe
n't5762RBn't
this5763DTthis
the5764DTthe
same5765JJsame
thing5766NNthing
as5767INas
that5768DTthat
,5769,,
where5770WRBwhere
we5771PPwe
did5772VVDdo
say5773VVsay
no5774UHno
,5775,,
we5776PPwe
're5777VBPbe
going5778VVGgo
to5779TOto
go5780VVgo
with5781INwith
the5782DTthe
text5783NNtext
,5784,,
not5785RBnot
with5786INwith
this5787DTthis
extrapolation5788NNextrapolation
?5789SENT?
[MR. LOEB]5790LOC[MR. LOEB]
Context5791NNcontext
here5792RBhere
is5793VBZbe
very5794RBvery
different5795JJdifferent
than5796INthan
Milner5797NPMilner
.5798SENT.
This5799DTthis
Court5800NPCourt
in5801INin
Milner5802NPMilner
expressly5803RBexpressly
said5804VVDsay
there5805EXthere
was5806VBDbe
n't5807RBn't
a5808DTa
judicial5809JJjudicial
consensus5810NNconsensus
supporting5811VVGsupport
the5812DTthe
D5813NPD
.5814SENT.
C5815LSc
.5816SENT.
Circu5817NPCircu
it5818PPit
's5819VBZbe
ruling5820VVGrule
.5821SENT.
Also5822RBalso
there5823RBthere
,5824,,
there5825EXthere
were5826VBDbe
n't5827RBn't
multiple5828JJmultiple
statutes5829NNSstatute
that5830RBthat
...5831:...
here5832RBhere
,5833,,
we5834PPwe
have5835VHPhave
295836CD@card@
statutes5837NNSstatute
,5838,,
after5839INafter
the5840DTthe
judicial5841JJjudicial
consensus5842NNconsensus
,5843,,
enacted5844VVNenact
which5845WDTwhich
effectively5846RBeffectively
amend5847VVPamend
Exemption5848NPExemption
45849CD4
...5850:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5851LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
As5852INas
to5853TOto
the5854DTthe
...5855:...
[MR. LOEB]5856LOC[MR. LOEB]
...5857:...
and5858CCand
that5859WDTthat
certainly5860RBcertainly
was5861VBDbe
not5862RBnot
the5863DTthe
case5864NNcase
...5865:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]5866LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
...5867:...
as5868RBas
to5869TOto
the5870DTthe
consensus5871NNconsensus
,5872,,
if5873INif
I5874PPI
can5875MDcan
stop5876VVstop
you5877PPyou
on5878INon
that5879DTthat
point5880NNpoint
,5881,,
we5882PPwe
're5883VBPbe
told5884VVNtell
by5885INby
the5886DTthe
other5887JJother
side5888NNside
that5889IN/thatthat
the5890DTthe
circuits5891NNScircuit
have5892VHPhave
been5893VBNbe
markedly5894RBmarkedly
inconsistent5895JJinconsistent
in5896INin
the5897DTthe
way5898NNway
they5899PPthey
apply5900VVPapply
the5901DTthe
test5902NNtest
.5903SENT.
So5904RBso
,5905,,
if5906INif
...5907:...
if5908INif
...5909:...
if5910INif
the5911DTthe
D5912NPD
.5913SENT.
C5914LSc
.5915SENT.
Circuit5916NPCircuit
had5917VHDhave
ruled5918VVNrule
one5919CDone
way5920NNway
and5921CCand
everybody5922NNeverybody
said5923VVDsay
,5924,,
yeah5925RByeah
,5926,,
this5927DTthis
is5928VBZbe
how5929WRBhow
we5930PPwe
do5931VVPdo
it5932PPit
,5933,,
and5934CCand
the5935DTthe
decisions5936NNSdecision
all5937RBall
lined5938VVDline
up5939RPup
,5940,,
that5941WDTthat
would5942MDwould
be5943VBbe
one5944CDone
thing5945NNthing
.5946SENT.
But5947CCbut
,5948,,
here5949RBhere
,5950,,
we5951PPwe
're5952VBPbe
told5953VVNtell
that5954IN/thatthat
they5955PPthey
will5956MDwill
verbalize5957VVverbalize
the5958DTthe
same5959JJsame
formulation5960NNformulation
,5961,,
but5962CCbut
they5963PPthey
apply5964VVPapply
it5965PPit
differently5966RBdifferently
.5967SENT.
[MR. LOEB]5968LOC[MR. LOEB]
Well5969UHwell
,5970,,
I5971PPI
think5972VVPthink
the5973DTthe
...5974:...
the5975DTthe
key5976JJkey
factor5977NNfactor
is5978VBZbe
they5979PPthey
all5980DTall
adopt5981VVadopt
the5982DTthe
same5983JJsame
two-prong5984NNtwo-prong
standard5985NNstandard
of5986INof
National5987NPNational
Parks5988NPParks
.5989SENT.
And5990CCand
in5991INin
any5992DTany
standard5993NNstandard
,5994,,
how5995WRBhow
it5996PPit
's5997VBZbe
applied5998VVNapply
,5999,,
even6000RBeven
terms6001NNSterm
like6002INlike
fraud6003NNfraud
,6004,,
which6005WDTwhich
are6006VBPbe
well6007RBwell
developed6008VVNdevelop
in6009INin
the6010DTthe
law6011NNlaw
,6012,,
as6013INas
it6014PPit
's6015VBZbe
applied6016VVNapply
to6017TOto
a6018DTa
particular6019JJparticular
circumstance6020NNcircumstance
,6021,,
there6022EXthere
's6023VBZbe
always6024RBalways
going6025VVGgo
to6026TOto
be6027VBbe
some6028DTsome
deviation6029NNdeviation
of6030INof
the6031DTthe
courts6032NNScourt
.6033SENT.
But6034CCbut
,6035,,
ultimately6036RBultimately
,6037,,
all6038PDTall
the6039DTthe
circuits6040NNScircuit
who6041WPwho
have6042VHPhave
addressed6043VVNaddress
this6044DTthis
issue6045NNissue
have6046VHPhave
adopted6047VVNadopt
the6048DTthe
National6049NPNational
Parks6050NPParks
standard6051NNstandard
and6052CCand
,6053,,
as6054RBas
to6055TOto
the6056DTthe
competitive6057JJcompetitive
harm6058NNharm
requirement6059NNrequirement
,6060,,
all6061RBall
require6062VVrequire
a6063DTa
showing6064NNshowing
of6065INof
likely6066JJlikely
competitive6067JJcompetitive
harm6068NNharm
.6069SENT.
And6070CCand
that6071DTthat
is6072VBZbe
the6073DTthe
standard6074NNstandard
we6075PPwe
're6076VBPbe
saying6077VVGsay
that6078WDTthat
is6079VBZbe
...6080:...
has6081VHZhave
been6082VBNbe
ratified6083VVNratify
here6084RBhere
.6085SENT.
If6086INif
you6087PPyou
look6088VVPlook
at6089INat
some6090DTsome
of6091INof
the6092DTthe
statutes6093NNSstatute
that6094WDTthat
we6095PPwe
attach6096VVPattach
in6097INin
our6098PP$our
addendum6099NNaddendum
,6100,,
they6101PPthey
are6102VBPbe
actually6103RBactually
limiting6104VVGlimit
the6105DTthe
discretion6106NNdiscretion
that6107WDTthat
's6108VBZbe
under6109INunder
Exemption6110NPExemption
46111CD4
.6112SENT.
So6113RBso
,6114,,
as6115INas
the6116DTthe
SG6117NPSG
's6118POS's
brief6119JJbrief
points6120NNSpoint
out6121RBout
,6122,,
Exemption6123NPExemption
46124CD4
does6125VVZdo
n't6126RBn't
prohibit6127VVprohibit
disclosure6128NNdisclosure
,6129,,
it6130PPit
just6131RBjust
says6132VVZsay
the6133DTthe
agency6134NNagency
has6135VHZhave
discretion6136NNdiscretion
whether6137INwhether
to6138TOto
disclose6139VVdisclose
or6140CCor
not6141RBnot
.6142SENT.
These6143DTthese
additional6144JJadditional
statutes6145NNSstatute
micromanage6146NNmicromanage
that6147DTthat
discretion6148NNdiscretion
.6149SENT.
Some6150DTsome
of6151INof
them6152PPthem
say6153VVPsay
that6154IN/thatthat
when6155WRBwhen
you6156PPyou
have6157VHPhave
the6158DTthe
discretion6159NNdiscretion
,6160,,
you6161PPyou
have6162VHPhave
to6163TOto
withhold6164VVwithhold
.6165SENT.
Some6166DTsome
say6167VVPsay
that6168IN/thatthat
when6169WRBwhen
you6170PPyou
have6171VHPhave
the6172DTthe
discretion6173NNdiscretion
,6174,,
you6175PPyou
have6176VHPhave
to6177TOto
withhold6178VVwithhold
for6179INfor
five6180CDfive
years6181NNSyear
.6182SENT.
Some6183DTsome
say6184VVPsay
when6185WRBwhen
you6186PPyou
have6187VHPhave
discretion6188NNdiscretion
,6189,,
you6190PPyou
have6191VHPhave
to6192TOto
ask6193VVask
the6194DTthe
private6195JJprivate
party6196NNparty
their6197PP$their
view6198NNview
.6199SENT.
Those6200DTthose
are6201VBPbe
all6202RBall
...6203:...
those6204DTthose
all6205RBall
could6206MDcould
have6207VHhave
been6208VBNbe
codified6209VVNcodify
under6210INunder
Exemption6211NPExemption
46212CD4
,6213,,
but6214CCbut
,6215,,
instead6216RBinstead
,6217,,
they6218PPthey
were6219VBDbe
codified6220VVNcodify
under6221INunder
separate6222JJseparate
statutes6223NNSstatute
.6224SENT.
But6225CCbut
that6226DTthat
's6227VBZbe
just6228RBjust
a6229DTa
matter6230NNmatter
of6231INof
formalism6232NNformalism
.6233SENT.
This6234DTthis
Court6235NPCourt
has6236VHZhave
said6237VVNsay
when6238WRBwhen
...6239:...
when6240WRBwhen
Congress6241NPCongress
actually6242RBactually
examines6243VVZexamine
a6244DTa
statute6245NNstatute
,6246,,
amends6247VVZamend
a6248DTa
statute6249NNstatute
,6250,,
and6251CCand
...6252:...
and6253CCand
reenacts6254VVZreenact
it6255PPit
,6256,,
that6257IN/thatthat
your6258PP$your
...6259:...
that6260DTthat
...6261:...
that6262IN/thatthat
Congress6263NPCongress
is6264VBZbe
presumed6265VVNpresume
to6266TOto
have6267VHhave
adopted6268VVNadopt
the6269DTthe
prevailing6270JJprevailing
judicial6271JJjudicial
construction6272NNconstruction
.6273SENT.
That6274DTthat
's6275VBZbe
what6276WPwhat
this6277DTthis
Court6278NPCourt
said6279VVDsay
in6280INin
Lorillard6281NPLorillard
,6282,,
in6283INin
Shapiro6284NPShapiro
,6285,,
and6286CCand
this6287DTthis
term6288NNterm
in6289INin
Helsinn6290NPHelsinn
.6291SENT.
And6292CCand
,6293,,
likewise6294RBlikewise
,6295,,
here6296RBhere
,6297,,
we6298PPwe
have6299VHPhave
all6300PDTall
the6301DTthe
circuits6302NNScircuit
lined6303VVDline
up6304RPup
on6305INon
the6306DTthe
two-prong6307NNtwo-prong
standards6308NNSstandard
.6309SENT.
We6310PPwe
have6311VHPhave
Congress6312NPCongress
not6313RBnot
just6314RBjust
addressing6315VVGaddress
the6316DTthe
statute6317NNstatute
once6318RBonce
but6319CCbut
296320CD@card@
times6321NNStime
in6322INin
this6323DTthis
18-year6324JJ18-year
period6325NNperiod
where6326WRBwhere
they6327PPthey
,6328,,
again6329RBagain
,6330,,
have6331VHPhave
codified6332VVNcodify
over6333RPover
and6334CCand
over6335RPover
again6336RBagain
that6337RBthat
...6338:...
that6339DTthat
...6340:...
that6341DTthat
standard6342NNstandard
.6343SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6344LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Mr6345NPMr
.6346SENT.
Loeb6347NPLoeb
,6348,,
along6349INalong
those6350DTthose
lines6351NNSline
,6352,,
the6353DTthe
other6354JJother
side6355NNside
makes6356VVZmake
the6357DTthe
argument6358NNargument
that6359IN/thatthat
,6360,,
in6361INin
Exemption6362NPExemption
76363CD7
,6364,,
the6365DTthe
word6366NNword
"6367``"
confidential6368JJconfidential
"6369''"
is6370VBZbe
given6371VVNgive
a6372DTa
different6373JJdifferent
gloss6374NNgloss
than6375INthan
you6376PPyou
would6377MDwould
have6378VHhave
us6379PPus
give6380VVgive
it6381PPit
in6382RPin
...6383:...
in6384INin
Exemption6385NPExemption
46386CD4
.6387SENT.
I6388PPI
'm6389VBPbe
sure6390JJsure
you6391PPyou
would6392MDwould
like6393VVlike
an6394DTan
opportunity6395NNopportunity
to6396TOto
respond6397VVrespond
to6398TOto
that6399DTthat
.6400SENT.
[MR. LOEB]6401LOC[MR. LOEB]
Correct6402JJcorrect
,6403,,
Your6404PP$your
Honor6405NPHonor
.6406SENT.
So6407RBso
,6408,,
in6409INin
looking6410VVGlook
at6411INat
Exemption6412NPExemption
46413CD4
,6414,,
you6415PPyou
have6416VHPhave
to6417TOto
look6418VVlook
at6419INat
those6420DTthose
words6421NNSword
in6422INin
...6423:...
in6424INin
a6425DTa
...6426:...
a6427DTa
textual6428JJtextual
construction6429NNconstruction
of6430INof
it6431PPit
.6432SENT.
We6433PPwe
'll6434MDwill
begin6435VVbegin
by6436INby
looking6437VVGlook
at6438INat
the6439DTthe
words6440NNSword
and6441CCand
looking6442VVGlook
at6443INat
how6444WRBhow
they6445PPthey
were6446VBDbe
used6447VVNuse
in6448INin
context6449NNcontext
at6450INat
the6451DTthe
time6452NNtime
.6453SENT.
And6454CCand
we6455PPwe
know6456VVPknow
for6457INfor
Exemption6458NPExemption
46459CD4
,6460,,
Congress6461NPCongress
started6462VVDstart
with6463INwith
a6464DTa
common6465JJcommon
law6466NNlaw
term6467NNterm
,6468,,
trade6469NNtrade
secrets6470NNSsecret
,6471,,
which6472WDTwhich
even6473RBeven
FMI6474NPFMI
agrees6475VVZagree
...6476:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6477LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
That6478DTthat
's6479VBZbe
another6480DTanother
point6481NNpoint
.6482SENT.
I6483PPI
'd6484MDwould
like6485VVlike
to6486TOto
get6487VVget
to6488TOto
that6489DTthat
too6490RBtoo
.6491SENT.
But6492CCbut
,6493,,
when6494WRBwhen
we6495PPwe
're6496VBPbe
dealing6497VVGdeal
with6498INwith
the6499DTthe
word6500NNword
"6501``"
confidential6502JJconfidential
"6503''"
,6504,,
Justice6505NPJustice
Kagan6506NPKagan
made6507VVDmake
the6508DTthe
point6509NNpoint
that6510IN/thatthat
perhaps6511RBperhaps
there6512EXthere
's6513VBZbe
a6514DTa
gloss6515NNgloss
that6516WDTthat
's6517VHZhave
been6518VBNbe
placed6519VVNplace
on6520INon
it6521PPit
that6522WDTthat
might6523MDmight
be6524VBbe
inconsistent6525JJinconsistent
with6526INwith
what6527WPwhat
might6528MDmight
appear6529VVappear
to6530TOto
be6531VBbe
its6532PP$its
ordinary6533JJordinary
meaning6534NNmeaning
.6535SENT.
And6536CCand
that6537DTthat
argument6538NNargument
seems6539VVZseem
to6540TOto
me6541PPme
to6542TOto
have6543VHhave
some6544DTsome
strength6545NNstrength
,6546,,
given6547VVNgive
the6548DTthe
fact6549NNfact
that6550IN/thatthat
Exemption6551NPExemption
76552CD7
has6553VHZhave
n't6554RBn't
been6555VBNbe
treated6556VVNtreat
by6557INby
lower6558JJRlow
courts6559NNScourt
that6560WDTthat
bear6561VVPbear
the6562DTthe
same6563JJsame
gloss6564NNgloss
that6565IN/thatthat
you6566PPyou
would6567MDwould
have6568VHhave
us6569PPus
put6570VVNput
on6571INon
Section6572NNsection
...6573:...
on6574INon
Exemption6575NPExemption
46576CD4
.6577SENT.
And6578CCand
I6579PPI
'm6580VBPbe
just6581RBjust
wondering6582VVGwonder
,6583,,
how6584WRBhow
do6585VVPdo
you6586PPyou
deal6587VVdeal
with6588INwith
that6589DTthat
incongruity6590NNincongruity
textually6591RBtextually
?6592SENT?
[MR. LOEB]6593LOC[MR. LOEB]
Right6594RBright
.6595SENT.
Well6596UHwell
,6597,,
first6598RBfirst
,6599,,
let6600VVPlet
me6601PPme
admit6602VVPadmit
we6603PPwe
're6604VBPbe
not6605RBnot
...6606:...
we6607PPwe
...6608:...
we6609PPwe
agree6610VVPagree
that6611IN/thatthat
the6612DTthe
reading6613NNreading
of6614INof
the6615DTthe
...6616:...
the6617DTthe
word6618NNword
in6619INin
Exemption6620NPExemption
76621CD7
and6622CCand
Exemption6623NPExemption
46624CD4
do6625VVPdo
n't6626RBn't
have6627VHhave
the6628DTthe
same6629JJsame
import6630NNimport
.6631SENT.
Let6632VVlet
me6633PPme
explain6634VVexplain
why6635WRBwhy
.6636SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6637LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
So6638RBso
why6639WRBwhy
should6640MDshould
we6641PPwe
give6642VVgive
the6643DTthe
same6644JJsame
word6645NNword
two6646CDtwo
different6647JJdifferent
meanings6648NNSmeaning
when6649WRBwhen
they6650PPthey
're6651VBPbe
virtual6652JJvirtual
neighbors6653NNSneighbor
?6654SENT?
[MR. LOEB]6655LOC[MR. LOEB]
First6656NPFirst
,6657,,
the6658DTthe
commonality6659NNcommonality
,6660,,
that6661WDTthat
even6662RBeven
under6663INunder
Exemption6664NPExemption
76665CD7
,6666,,
this6667DTthis
Court6668NPCourt
did6669VVDdo
n't6670RBn't
turn6671VVturn
to6672TOto
ask6673VVask
the6674DTthe
confidential6675JJconfidential
source6676NNsource
,6677,,
do6678VVPdo
you6679PPyou
think6680VVPthink
that6681IN/thatthat
you6682PPyou
had6683VHDhave
a6684DTa
confidential6685JJconfidential
relationship6686NNrelationship
?6687SENT?
Instead6688RBinstead
,6689,,
they6690PPthey
looked6691VVDlook
for6692INfor
objective6693JJobjective
factors6694NNSfactor
.6695SENT.
And6696CCand
our6697PP$our
...6698:...
our6699PP$our
standard6700NNstandard
here6701RBhere
is6702VBZbe
looking6703VVGlook
at6704INat
an6705DTan
objective6706JJobjective
one6707CDone
,6708,,
objective6709JJobjective
harm6710NNharm
.6711SENT.
Second6712RBsecond
,6713,,
the6714DTthe
fact6715NNfact
that6716IN/thatthat
the6717DTthe
same6718JJsame
word6719NNword
is6720VBZbe
used6721VVNuse
in6722INin
different6723JJdifferent
provisions6724NNSprovision
of6725INof
the6726DTthe
exemption6727NNexemption
does6728VVZdo
n't6729RBn't
answer6730VVanswer
it6731PPit
.6732SENT.
For6733INfor
example6734NNexample
,6735,,
trade6736NNtrade
secrets6737NNSsecret
has6738VHZhave
the6739DTthe
word6740NNword
"6741``"
secret6742JJsecret
"6743''"
.6744SENT.
But6745CCbut
,6746,,
if6747INif
you6748PPyou
look6749VVPlook
at6750INat
Exemption6751NPExemption
16752CD1
,6753,,
it6754PPit
uses6755VVZuse
the6756DTthe
word6757NNword
"6758``"
secret6759JJsecret
"6760''"
regarding6761VVGregard
national6762JJnational
security6763NNsecurity
matters6764NNSmatter
.6765SENT.
You6766PPyou
would6767MDwould
n't6768RBn't
say6769VVsay
the6770DTthe
word6771NNword
"6772``"
secret6773JJsecret
"6774''"
regarding6775VVGregard
national6776JJnational
security6777NNsecurity
secrets6778NNSsecret
has6779VHZhave
to6780TOto
be6781VBbe
read6782VVNread
the6783DTthe
same6784JJsame
as6785INas
trade6786NNtrade
secrets6787NNSsecret
because6788INbecause
trade6789NNtrade
secrets6790NNSsecret
has6791VHZhave
a6792DTa
common6793JJcommon
law6794NNlaw
meaning6795NNmeaning
.6796SENT.
And6797CCand
that6798DTthat
common6799JJcommon
law6800NNlaw
meaning6801NNmeaning
...6802:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]6803LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
I6804PPI
agree6805VVPagree
,6806,,
secrets6807NNSsecret
in6808INin
the6809DTthe
national6810JJnational
security6811NNsecurity
context6812NNcontext
might6813MDmight
be6814VBbe
different6815JJdifferent
than6816INthan
they6817PPthey
are6818VBPbe
in6819INin
the6820DTthe
trade6821NNtrade
secret6822JJsecret
context6823NNcontext
,6824,,
but6825CCbut
that6826WDTthat
's6827VBZbe
...6828:...
that6829WDTthat
's6830VBZbe
just6831RBjust
not6832RBnot
helping6833VVGhelp
me6834PPme
with6835INwith
the6836DTthe
word6837NNword
"6838``"
confidential6839JJconfidential
"6840''"
.6841SENT.
So6842RBso
perhaps6843RBperhaps
there6844EXthere
's6845VBZbe
something6846NNsomething
particular6847JJparticular
about6848INabout
it6849PPit
,6850,,
maybe6851RBmaybe
there6852EXthere
is6853VBZbe
n't6854RBn't
.6855SENT.
I6856PPI
'll6857MDwill
let6858VVlet
you6859PPyou
go6860VVgo
on6861RPon
.6862SENT.
[MR. LOEB]6863LOC[MR. LOEB]
No6864UHNo
,6865,,
no6866UHno
.6867SENT.
There6868EXthere
's6869VBZbe
something6870NNsomething
particular6871JJparticular
about6872INabout
Exemption6873NPExemption
76874CD7
.6875SENT.
It6876PPit
talks6877VVZtalk
about6878INabout
information6879NNinformation
that6880WDTthat
's6881VBZbe
...6882:...
information6883NNinformation
that6884WDTthat
is6885VBZbe
furnished6886VVNfurnish
under6887INunder
a6888DTa
basis6889NNbasis
of6890INof
...6891:...
a6892DTa
confidential6893JJconfidential
basis6894NNbasis
.6895SENT.
So6896RBso
there6897RBthere
,6898,,
where6899WRBwhere
Congress6900NPCongress
wanted6901VVDwant
to6902TOto
say6903VVsay
it6904PPit
was6905VBDbe
furnished6906VVNfurnish
on6907INon
a6908DTa
confidential6909JJconfidential
basis6910NNbasis
,6911,,
it6912PPit
knew6913VVDknow
how6914WRBhow
to6915TOto
say6916VVsay
that6917DTthat
.6918SENT.
That6919DTthat
's6920VBZbe
not6921RBnot
what6922WPwhat
it6923PPit
says6924VVZsay
under6925INunder
Exemption6926NPExemption
46927CD4
.6928SENT.
Instead6929RBinstead
,6930,,
we6931PPwe
have6932VHPhave
Congress6933NPCongress
adopting6934VVGadopt
these6935DTthese
common6936JJcommon
law6937NNlaw
terms6938NNSterm
,6939,,
trade6940NNtrade
secrets6941NNSsecret
and6942CCand
related6943JJrelated
confidential6944JJconfidential
commercial6945JJcommercial
information6946NNinformation
,6947,,
and6948CCand
when6949WRBwhen
looking6950VVGlook
at6951INat
those6952DTthose
...6953:...
those6954DTthose
words6955NNSword
anew6956RBanew
,6957,,
you6958PPyou
would6959MDwould
...6960:...
you6961PPyou
would6962MDwould
look6963VVlook
at6964INat
how6965WRBhow
they6966PPthey
were6967VBDbe
used6968VVNuse
in6969INin
19666970CD@card@
under6971INunder
the6972DTthe
common6973JJcommon
law6974NNlaw
.6975SENT.
And6976CCand
we6977PPwe
know6978VVPknow
trade6979NNtrade
secrets6980NNSsecret
required6981VVNrequire
under6982INunder
the6983DTthe
common6984JJcommon
law6985NNlaw
a6986DTa
showing6987NNshowing
of6988INof
competitive6989JJcompetitive
harm6990NNharm
.6991SENT.
And6992CCand
for6993INfor
the6994DTthe
restatement6995NNrestatement
,6996,,
we6997PPwe
know6998VVPknow
that6999IN/thatthat
this7000DTthis
other7001JJother
second7002JJsecond
box7003NNbox
of7004INof
...7005:...
of7006INof
confidential7007JJconfidential
business7008NNbusiness
information7009NNinformation
also7010RBalso
required7011VVDrequire
a7012DTa
showing7013NNshowing
of7014INof
competitive7015JJcompetitive
harm7016NNharm
.7017SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]7018LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
So7019RBso
...7020:...
so7021RBso
what7022WPwhat
do7023VVPdo
you7024PPyou
...7025:...
do7026VVPdo
you7027PPyou
think7028VVPthink
?7029SENT?
That7030DTthat
is7031VBZbe
,7032,,
what7033WPwhat
do7034VVPdo
you7035PPyou
think7036VVPthink
about7037RBabout
that7038RBthat
?7039SENT?
I7040PPI
mean7041VVPmean
,7042,,
in7043INin
reading7044VVGread
some7045DTsome
of7046INof
these7047DTthese
cases7048NNScase
,7049,,
it7050PPit
was7051VBDbe
n't7052RBn't
National7053NPNational
Parks7054NPParks
so7055RBso
much7056RBmuch
that7057IN/thatthat
I7058PPI
think7059VVPthink
caused7060VVNcause
the7061DTthe
problem7062NNproblem
but7063CCbut
other7064JJother
cases7065NNScase
that7066DTthat
sort7067NNsort
of7068INof
run7069NNrun
with7070INwith
it7071PPit
.7072SENT.
That7073DTthat
is7074VBZbe
,7075,,
some7076DTsome
say7077VVPsay
,7078,,
well7079RBwell
,7080,,
the7081DTthe
competitors7082NNScompetitor
have7083VHPhave
to7084TOto
use7085VVuse
this7086DTthis
in7087INin
an7088DTan
affirmative7089JJaffirmative
way7090NNway
.7091SENT.
I7092PPI
do7093VVPdo
n't7094RBn't
know7095VVknow
where7096WRBwhere
they7097PPthey
got7098VVDget
that7099IN/thatthat
out7100INout
of7101INof
the7102DTthe
statute7103NNstatute
.7104SENT.
So7105RBso
would7106MDwould
you7107PPyou
be7108VBbe
satisfied7109VVNsatisfy
if7110INif
we7111PPwe
were7112VBDbe
to7113TOto
simply7114RBsimply
say7115VVsay
:7116::
Well7117UHWell
,7118,,
they7119PPthey
had7120VHDhave
the7121DTthe
right7122JJright
idea7123NNidea
there7124RBthere
.7125SENT.
Confidential7126JJconfidential
information7127NNinformation
is7128VBZbe
information7129NNinformation
that7130WDTthat
is7131VBZbe
legitimate7132JJlegitimate
for7133INfor
a7134DTa
confidential7135JJconfidential
...7136:...
for7137INfor
a7138DTa
legitimate7139JJlegitimate
reason7140NNreason
.7141SENT.
It7142PPit
's7143VBZbe
confidential7144JJconfidential
for7145INfor
a7146DTa
legitimate7147JJlegitimate
reason7148NNreason
.7149SENT.
Release7150NNrelease
would7151MDwould
hurt7152VVhurt
the7153DTthe
company7154NNcompany
or7155CCor
release7156NNrelease
would7157MDwould
hurt7158VVhurt
the7159DTthe
government7160NNgovernment
.7161SENT.
And7162CCand
then7163RBthen
we7164PPwe
add7165VVPadd
:7166::
And7167CCand
,7168,,
of7169INof
course7170NNcourse
,7171,,
there7172EXthere
has7173VHZhave
to7174TOto
be7175VBbe
harm7176NNharm
,7177,,
I7178PPI
mean7179VVPmean
,7180,,
business-related7181JJbusiness-related
harm7182NNharm
to7183TOto
the7184DTthe
company7185NNcompany
.7186SENT.
Now7187RBnow
that7188IN/thatthat
would7189MDwould
stop7190VVstop
...7191:...
you7192PPyou
know7193VVPknow
,7194,,
I7195PPI
can7196MDcan
imagine7197VVimagine
easily7198RBeasily
cases7199NNScase
where7200WRBwhere
there7201EXthere
's7202VBZbe
information7203NNinformation
about7204INabout
who7205WPwho
you7206PPyou
sell7207VVsell
to7208TOto
and7209CCand
who7210WPwho
you7211PPyou
do7212VVPdo
n't7213RBn't
sell7214VVsell
to7215TOto
,7216,,
and7217CCand
,7218,,
of7219INof
course7220NNcourse
,7221,,
you7222PPyou
want7223VVPwant
to7224TOto
keep7225VVkeep
that7226IN/thatthat
quiet7227JJquiet
because7228INbecause
you7229PPyou
give7230VVPgive
the7231DTthe
impression7232NNimpression
that7233IN/thatthat
every7234DTevery
sane7235JJsane
person7236NNperson
in7237INin
the7238DTthe
world7239NNworld
buys7240VVZbuy
your7241PP$your
product7242NNproduct
.7243SENT.
And7244CCand
this7245DTthis
would7246MDwould
show7247VVshow
that7248DTthat
's7249VBZbe
not7250RBnot
true7251JJtrue
.7252SENT.
But7253CCbut
we7254PPwe
do7255VVPdo
n't7256RBn't
know7257VVknow
whether7258INwhether
people7259NNSpeople
will7260MDwill
take7261VVtake
advantage7262NNadvantage
of7263INof
that7264WDTthat
or7265CCor
not7266RBnot
,7267,,
but7268CCbut
they7269PPthey
might7270MDmight
.7271SENT.
So7272RBso
it7273PPit
's7274VBZbe
harm7275NNharm
,7276,,
and7277CCand
it7278PPit
's7279VBZbe
legitimate7280JJlegitimate
.7281SENT.
Is7282VBZbe
that7283IN/thatthat
good7284JJgood
enough7285NNenough
in7286INin
your7287PP$your
opinion7288NNopinion
?7289SENT?
[MR. LOEB]7290LOC[MR. LOEB]
Yes7291NPYes
,7292,,
Your7293PP$your
Honor7294NPHonor
.7295SENT.
So7296RBso
...7297:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]7298LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yes7299NPYes
?7300SENT?
[MR. LOEB]7301LOC[MR. LOEB]
...7302:...
the7303DTthe
National7304NPNational
Parks7305NPParks
test7306NNtest
requires7307VVZrequire
a7308DTa
likely7309JJlikely
showing7310NNshowing
of7311INof
competitive7312JJcompetitive
harm7313NNharm
.7314SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]7315LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And7316CCand
...7317:...
and7318CCand
it7319PPit
's7320VBZbe
other7321JJother
cases7322NNScase
that7323WDTthat
have7324VHPhave
gone7325VVNgo
beyond7326INbeyond
that7327DTthat
.7328SENT.
[MR. LOEB]7329LOC[MR. LOEB]
To7330NPTo
...7331:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]7332LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Likely7333JJlikely
showing7334NNshowing
of7335INof
competitive7336JJcompetitive
harm7337NNharm
.7338SENT.
Maybe7339RBmaybe
it7340PPit
's7341VBZbe
harm7342NNharm
to7343TOto
business7344NNbusiness
.7345SENT.
Maybe7346RBmaybe
when7347WRBwhen
people7348NNSpeople
find7349VVPfind
out7350RPout
about7351INabout
this7352DTthis
,7353,,
they7354PPthey
just7355RBjust
will7356MDwill
stop7357VVstop
buying7358VVGbuy
it7359PPit
,7360,,
though7361INthough
no7362DTno
new7363JJnew
person7364NNperson
will7365MDwill
enter7366VVenter
the7367DTthe
market7368NNmarket
.7369SENT.
You7370PPyou
see7371VVPsee
,7372,,
I7373PPI
mean7374VVPmean
,7375,,
I7376PPI
...7377:...
I7378PPI
do7379VVPdo
n't7380RBn't
see7381VVsee
the7382DTthe
harm7383NNharm
being7384VBGbe
any7385DTany
different7386JJdifferent
there7387RBthere
.7388SENT.
And7389CCand
I7390PPI
ask7391VVPask
the7392DTthe
question7393NNquestion
,7394,,
say7395VVPsay
,7396,,
is7397VBZbe
it7398PPit
necessary7399JJnecessary
to7400TOto
use7401VVuse
,7402,,
with7403INwith
the7404DTthe
word7405NNword
"7406``"
harm7407NNharm
"7408''"
,7409,,
that7410DTthat
word7411NNword
"7412``"
competitive7413JJcompetitive
"7414''"
,7415,,
rather7416RBrather
than7417INthan
a7418DTa
more7419RBRmore
general7420JJgeneral
word7421NNword
,7422,,
like7423INlike
"7424``"
business7425NNbusiness
"7426''"
?7427SENT?
[MR. LOEB]7428LOC[MR. LOEB]
I7429PPI
...7430:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]7431LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Business-related7432JJbusiness-related
.7433SENT.
[MR. LOEB]7434LOC[MR. LOEB]
Well7435UHWell
,7436,,
trade7437NNtrade
secrets7438NNSsecret
,7439,,
which7440WDTwhich
is7441VBZbe
the7442DTthe
brother7443NNbrother
of7444INof
this7445DTthis
category7446NNcategory
of7447INof
information7448NNinformation
...7449:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]7450LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But7451CCbut
,7452,,
I7453PPI
'm7454VBPbe
curious7455JJcurious
,7456,,
if7457INif
you7458PPyou
can7459MDcan
give7460VVgive
me7461PPme
a7462DTa
yes-or-no7463NNyes-or-no
answer7464NNanswer
,7465,,
it7466PPit
would7467MDwould
really7468RBreally
help7469VVhelp
.7470SENT.
You7471PPyou
do7472VVPdo
n't7473RBn't
have7474VHhave
to7475TOto
,7476,,
but7477CCbut
it7478PPit
would7479MDwould
help7480VVhelp
me7481PPme
.7482SENT.
[MR. LOEB]7483LOC[MR. LOEB]
Our7484PP$our
threshold7485NNthreshold
answer7486NNanswer
is7487VBZbe
that7488IN/thatthat
it7489PPit
...7490:...
it7491PPit
requires7492VVZrequire
a7493DTa
competitive7494JJcompetitive
harm7495NNharm
.7496SENT.
But7497CCbut
even7498RBeven
National7499NPNational
Parks7500NPParks
and7501CCand
the7502DTthe
circuits7503NNScircuit
adopting7504VVGadopt
it7505PPit
have7506VHPhave
n't7507RBn't
...7508:...
did7509VVDdo
n't7510RBn't
say7511VVsay
that7512WDTthat
was7513VBDbe
hermetically7514RBhermetically
sealed7515VVNseal
,7516,,
and7517CCand
there7518EXthere
could7519MDcould
be7520VBbe
other7521JJother
related7522VVNrelate
business7523NNbusiness
harms7524VVZharm
that7525IN/thatthat
you7526PPyou
could7527MDcould
show7528VVshow
were7529VBDbe
to7530TOto
the7531DTthe
same7532JJsame
level7533NNlevel
and7534CCand
that7535WDTthat
should7536MDshould
still7537RBstill
trigger7538VVtrigger
...7539:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7540LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I7541PPI
'm7542VBPbe
sorry7543JJsorry
,7544,,
do7545VVPdo
you7546PPyou
accept7547VVaccept
the7548DTthe
reasonable7549JJreasonable
possibility7550NNpossibility
of7551INof
harm7552NNharm
test7553NNtest
?7554SENT?
[MR. LOEB]7555LOC[MR. LOEB]
No7556NPNo
.7557SENT.
No7558UHNo
,7559,,
Your7560PP$your
Honor7561NPHonor
.7562SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7563LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Because7564INbecause
Justice7565NPJustice
Breyer7566NPBreyer
,7567,,
in7568INin
his7569PP$his
description7570NNdescription
,7571,,
said7572VVDsay
sometimes7573RBsometimes
you7574PPyou
just7575RBjust
can7576MDcan
't7577RB't
prove7578VVprove
it7579PPit
,7580,,
but7581CCbut
you7582PPyou
...7583:...
there7584EXthere
's7585VBZbe
a7586DTa
reasonable7587JJreasonable
possibility7588NNpossibility
of7589INof
it7590PPit
.7591SENT.
That7592DTthat
has7593VHZhave
been7594VBNbe
thrown7595VVNthrow
out7596RPout
as7597INas
a7598DTa
...7599:...
as7600INas
a7601DTa
...7602:...
why7603WRBwhy
is7604VBZbe
that7605IN/thatthat
not7606RBnot
enough7607RBenough
?7608SENT?
[MR. LOEB]7609LOC[MR. LOEB]
Well7610UHWell
,7611,,
under7612INunder
the7613DTthe
common7614JJcommon
law7615NNlaw
and7616CCand
under7617INunder
the7618DTthe
restatement7619NNrestatement
,7620,,
there7621EXthere
was7622VBDbe
always7623RBalways
a7624DTa
requirement7625NNrequirement
of7626INof
showing7627VVGshow
a7628DTa
likely7629JJlikely
competitive7630JJcompetitive
harm7631NNharm
or7632CCor
a7633DTa
likely7634JJlikely
harm7635NNharm
of7636INof
sorts7637NNSsort
.7638SENT.
So7639INso
having7640VHGhave
just7641RBjust
a7642DTa
reasonable7643JJreasonable
possibility7644NNpossibility
seems7645VVZseem
to7646TOto
be7647VBbe
sort7648NNsort
of7649INof
more7650JJRmore
of7651INof
a7652DTa
scintilla7653NNscintilla
argument7654NNargument
which7655WDTwhich
...7656:...
which7657WDTwhich
would7658MDwould
allow7659VVallow
so7660RBso
much7661RBmuch
more7662JJRmore
information7663NNinformation
here7664RBhere
to7665TOto
be7666VBbe
withheld7667VVNwithhold
.7668SENT.
It7669PPit
's7670VBZbe
not7671RBnot
such7672PDTsuch
a7673DTa
strong7674JJstrong
burden7675NNburden
to7676TOto
say7677VVsay
...7678:...
I7679PPI
'm7680VBPbe
not7681RBnot
saying7682VVGsay
you7683PPyou
have7684VHPhave
to7685TOto
show7686VVshow
there7687EXthere
will7688MDwill
be7689VBbe
actual7690JJactual
competitive7691JJcompetitive
harm7692NNharm
,7693,,
just7694RBjust
there7695EXthere
is7696VBZbe
a7697DTa
likelihood7698NNlikelihood
of7699INof
...7700:...
of7701INof
competitive7702JJcompetitive
harm7703NNharm
.7704SENT.
And7705CCand
that7706DTthat
standard7707NNstandard
has7708VHZhave
prevailed7709VVNprevail
for7710INfor
407711CD@card@
some7712DTsome
years7713NNSyear
.7714SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7715LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
How7716WRBHow
is7717VBZbe
that7718IN/thatthat
different7719JJdifferent
from7720INfrom
substantial7721JJsubstantial
harm7722NNharm
?7723SENT?
That7724DTthat
's7725VBZbe
the7726DTthe
National7727NPNational
Parks7728NPParks
test7729NNtest
.7730SENT.
[MR. LOEB]7731LOC[MR. LOEB]
So7732INso
we7733PPwe
think7734VVPthink
the7735DTthe
other7736JJother
side7737NNside
over-reads7738NNSover-reads
the7739DTthe
word7740NNword
"7741``"
substantial7742JJsubstantial
"7743''"
.7744SENT.
It's7745NPIt's
,7746,,
I7747PPI
think7748VVPthink
,7749,,
properly7750RBproperly
read7751VVNread
to7752TOto
be7753VBbe
the7754DTthe
contrast7755NNcontrast
...7756:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]7757LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Is7758VBZbe
it7759PPit
them7760PPthem
or7761CCor
other7762JJother
courts7763NNScourt
?7764SENT?
[MR. LOEB]7765LOC[MR. LOEB]
I7766PPI
...7767:...
I7768PPI
think7769VVPthink
there7770EXthere
are7771VBPbe
a7772DTa
few7773JJfew
outlier7774NNoutlier
courts7775NNScourt
,7776,,
but7777CCbut
most7778JJSmost
courts7779NNScourt
have7780VHPhave
applied7781VVNapply
it7782PPit
as7783INas
the7784DTthe
Eighth7785JJeighth
Circuit7786NNcircuit
here7787RBhere
.7788SENT.
It7789PPit
has7790VHZhave
to7791TOto
distinguish7792VVdistinguish
between7793INbetween
substantial7794JJsubstantial
and7795CCand
insubstantial7796JJinsubstantial
.7797SENT.
And7798CCand
,7799,,
here7800RBhere
,7801,,
the7802DTthe
district7803NNdistrict
court7804NNcourt
found7805VVDfind
that7806IN/thatthat
the7807DTthe
evidence7808NNevidence
presented7809VVNpresent
by7810INby
the7811DTthe
government7812NNgovernment
and7813CCand
by7814INby
FMI7815NPFMI
to7816TOto
show7817VVshow
harm7818NNharm
was7819VBDbe
...7820:...
was7821VBDbe
speculative7822JJspeculative
at7823INat
best7824JJSgood
and7825CCand
marginal7826JJmarginal
at7827INat
best7828JJSgood
.7829SENT.
So7830INso
they7831PPthey
...7832:...
they7833PPthey
did7834VVDdo
n't7835RBn't
meet7836VVmeet
whatever7837WDTwhatever
low7838JJlow
standard7839NNstandard
there7840RBthere
would7841MDwould
...7842:...
you7843PPyou
could7844MDcould
articulate7845VVarticulate
,7846,,
but7847CCbut
the7848DTthe
requirement7849NNrequirement
of7850INof
some7851DTsome
non-insubstantial7852JJnon-insubstantial
likely7853JJlikely
harm7854NNharm
I7855PPI
do7856VVPdo
n't7857RBn't
think7858VVthink
is7859VBZbe
a7860DTa
...7861:...
is7862VBZbe
a7863DTa
...7864:...
too7865RBtoo
high7866JJhigh
a7867DTa
bar7868NNbar
to7869TOto
put7870VVput
to7871TOto
the7872DTthe
...7873:...
the7874DTthe
private7875JJprivate
party7876NNparty
trying7877VVGtry
to7878TOto
bar7879VVbar
disclosure7880NNdisclosure
of7881INof
the7882DTthe
information7883NNinformation
.7884SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]7885LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
What7886WPWhat
if7887INif
the7888DTthe
standard7889NNstandard
were7890VBDbe
that7891IN/thatthat
the7892DTthe
...7893:...
the7894DTthe
agency7895NNagency
must7896MDmust
reasonably7897RBreasonably
foresee7898VVforesee
disclosure7899NNdisclosure
would7900MDwould
harm7901VVharm
an7902DTan
interest7903NNinterest
protected7904VVNprotect
by7905INby
an7906DTan
exemption7907NNexemption
?7908SENT?
That7909DTthat
's7910VBZbe
the7911DTthe
language7912NNlanguage
of7913INof
the7914DTthe
20167915CD@card@
amendment7916NNamendment
.7917SENT.
[MR. LOEB]7918LOC[MR. LOEB]
Certainly7919RBcertainly
,7920,,
that7921WDTthat
provides7922VVZprovide
...7923:...
that7924WDTthat
applies7925VVZapply
now7926RBnow
to7927TOto
all7928DTall
of7929INof
the7930DTthe
FOIA7931NPFOIA
exemptions7932NNSexemption
under7933INunder
the7934DTthe
20167935CD@card@
amendment7936NNamendment
.7937SENT.
This7938DTthis
is7939VBZbe
a7940DTa
pre-20167941JJpre-2016
case7942NNcase
.7943SENT.
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]7944LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
But7945CCbut
it7946PPit
...7947:...
it7948PPit
applies7949VVZapply
to7950TOto
Exemption7951NPExemption
47952CD4
?7953SENT?
[MR. LOEB]7954LOC[MR. LOEB]
It7955PPit
does7956VVZdo
for7957INfor
future7958JJfuture
cases7959NNScase
.7960SENT.
This7961DTthis
case7962NNcase
was7963VBDbe
a7964DTa
pre-20167965JJpre-2016
case7966NNcase
,7967,,
so7968RBso
it7969PPit
does7970VVZdo
n't7971RBn't
apply7972VVapply
to7973TOto
this7974DTthis
particular7975JJparticular
case7976NNcase
,7977,,
but7978CCbut
it7979PPit
...7980:...
it7981PPit
certainly7982RBcertainly
undercuts7983VVZundercut
the7984DTthe
arguments7985NNSargument
of7986INof
the7987DTthe
government7988NNgovernment
and7989CCand
of7990INof
FMI7991NPFMI
that7992IN/thatthat
it7993PPit
's7994VBZbe
the7995DTthe
...7996:...
to7997TOto
require7998VVrequire
a7999DTa
showing8000NNshowing
of8001INof
harm8002NNharm
requires8003VVZrequire
all8004PDTall
these8005DTthese
trials8006NNStrial
and8007CCand
it8008PPit
's8009VBZbe
really8010RBreally
unadministrable8011JJunadministrable
,8012,,
when8013WRBwhen
Congress8014NPCongress
not8015RBnot
only8016RBonly
adopted8017VVDadopt
that8018IN/thatthat
for8019INfor
Exemption8020NPExemption
48021CD4
but8022CCbut
for8023INfor
all8024PDTall
the8025DTthe
provisions8026NNSprovision
...8027:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]8028LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
It8029PPit
just8030RBjust
does8031VVZdo
n't8032RBn't
say8033VVsay
competitive8034JJcompetitive
harm8035NNharm
.8036SENT.
It8037PPit
just8038RBjust
says8039VVZsay
disclose8040VVdisclose
what8041WPwhat
harm8042VVPharm
an8043DTan
interest8044NNinterest
protected8045VVNprotect
by8046INby
an8047DTan
exemption8048NNexemption
.8049SENT.
[MR. LOEB]8050LOC[MR. LOEB]
Right8051RBright
.8052SENT.
And8053CCand
the8054DTthe
courts8055NNScourt
will8056MDwill
have8057VHhave
to8058TOto
fill8059VVfill
out8060RPout
what8061WPwhat
that8062DTthat
means8063NNmeans
on8064INon
an8065DTan
exemption-by-exemption8066NNexemption-by-exemption
basis8067NNbasis
and8068CCand
what8069WPwhat
's8070VBZbe
required8071VVNrequire
and8072CCand
whether8073INwhether
it8074PPit
's8075VBZbe
the8076DTthe
government8077NNgovernment
who8078WPwho
believes8079VVZbelieve
it8080PPit
or8081CCor
it8082PPit
's8083VBZbe
something8084NNsomething
that8085WDTthat
's8086VBZbe
a8087DTa
de8088NPde
novo8089NNnovo
review8090NNreview
by8091INby
the8092DTthe
court8093NNcourt
.8094SENT.
That8095DTthat
's8096VBZbe
something8097NNsomething
that8098WDTthat
still8099RBstill
needs8100VVZneed
to8101TOto
be8102VBbe
worked8103VVNwork
out8104RPout
under8105INunder
the8106DTthe
20168107CD@card@
amendments8108NNSamendment
.8109SENT.
And8110CCand
if8111INif
this8112DTthis
Court8113NPCourt
had8114VHDhave
granted8115VVNgrant
a8116DTa
case8117NNcase
under8118INunder
the8119DTthe
20168120CD@card@
amendments8121NNSamendment
,8122,,
we8123PPwe
...8124:...
I8125PPI
think8126VVPthink
we8127PPwe
could8128MDcould
talk8129VVtalk
about8130RBabout
how8131WRBhow
it8132PPit
applies8133VVZapply
here8134RBhere
,8135,,
but8136CCbut
it8137PPit
simply8138RBsimply
does8139VVZdo
n't8140RBn't
apply8141VVapply
to8142TOto
...8143:...
to8144TOto
this8145DTthis
particular8146JJparticular
...8147:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]8148LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
May8149NPmay
...8150:...
may8151MDmay
I8152PPI
ask8153VVask
,8154,,
Mr8155NPMr
.8156SENT.
Loeb8157NPLoeb
,8158,,
if8159INif
...8160:...
if8161INif
I8162PPI
were8163VBDbe
to8164TOto
say8165VVsay
to8166TOto
you8167PPyou
give8168VVgive
me8169PPme
your8170PP$your
best8171JJSgood
shot8172NNshot
on8173INon
a8174DTa
textual8175JJtextual
argument8176NNargument
for8177INfor
your8178PP$your
position8179NNposition
,8180,,
so8181RBso
putting8182VVGput
aside8183RPaside
subsequent8184JJsubsequent
congressional8185JJcongressional
inaction8186NNinaction
,8187,,
putting8188VVGput
aside8189RBaside
how8190WRBhow
many8191JJmany
courts8192NNScourt
have8193VHPhave
adopted8194VVNadopt
this8195DTthis
test8196NNtest
,8197,,
just8198RBjust
sort8199RBsort
of8200INof
give8201VVgive
me8202PPme
your8203PP$your
best8204JJSgood
shot8205NNshot
for8206INfor
why8207WRBwhy
this8208DTthis
is8209VBZbe
the8210DTthe
right8211JJright
way8212NNway
to8213TOto
read8214VVread
the8215DTthe
text8216NNtext
,8217,,
what8218WPwhat
would8219MDwould
you8220PPyou
say8221VVsay
?8222SENT?
[MR. LOEB]8223LOC[MR. LOEB]
I8224PPI
would8225MDwould
say8226VVsay
you8227PPyou
have8228VHPhave
to8229TOto
look8230VVlook
at8231INat
words8232NNSword
in8233INin
context8234NNcontext
and8235CCand
that8236IN/thatthat
their8237PP$their
neighbors8238NNSneighbor
inform8239VVinform
their8240PP$their
meaning8241NNmeaning
.8242SENT.
And8243CCand
as8244INas
this8245DTthis
Court8246NPCourt
has8247VHZhave
said8248VVNsay
under8249INunder
...8250:...
when8251WRBwhen
it8252PPit
's8253VBZbe
looked8254VVNlook
at8255INat
other8256JJother
FOIA8257NPFOIA
provisions8258NNSprovision
,8259,,
that8260WDTthat
you8261PPyou
first8262RBfirst
look8263VVPlook
to8264TOto
the8265DTthe
common8266JJcommon
law8267NNlaw
to8268TOto
help8269VVhelp
inform8270VVinform
what8271WPwhat
the8272DTthe
language8273NNlanguage
means8274VVZmean
.8275SENT.
Where8276WRBwhere
a8277DTa
plain8278JJplain
language8279NNlanguage
is8280VBZbe
,8281,,
they8282PPthey
just8283RBjust
want8284VVPwant
to8285TOto
look8286VVlook
at8287INat
dictionaries8288NNSdictionary
,8289,,
but8290CCbut
even8291RBeven
the8292DTthe
dictionaries8293NNSdictionary
are8294VBPbe
ambiguous8295JJambiguous
.8296SENT.
But8297CCbut
the8298DTthe
common8299JJcommon
law8300NNlaw
tells8301VVZtell
you8302PPyou
at8303INat
the8304DTthe
time8305NNtime
that8306IN/thatthat
Congress8307NPCongress
chose8308VVDchoose
the8309DTthe
word8310NNword
"8311``"
trade8312NNtrade
secrets8313NNSsecret
,8314,,
"8315''"
which8316WDTwhich
has8317VHZhave
a8318DTa
common8319JJcommon
law8320NNlaw
meaning8321NNmeaning
which8322WDTwhich
requires8323VVZrequire
competitive8324JJcompetitive
harm8325NNharm
.8326SENT.
And8327CCand
the8328DTthe
restatement8329NNrestatement
as8330INas
well8331RBwell
said8332VVNsay
there8333EXthere
was8334VBDbe
a8335DTa
second8336JJsecond
category8337NNcategory
of8338INof
business8339NNbusiness
information8340NNinformation
and8341CCand
that8342IN/thatthat
it8343PPit
was8344VBDbe
treated8345VVNtreat
the8346DTthe
same8347JJsame
way8348NNway
under8349INunder
the8350DTthe
same8351JJsame
standard8352NNstandard
and8353CCand
required8354JJrequired
competitive8355JJcompetitive
harm8356NNharm
.8357SENT.
So8358RBso
you8359PPyou
look8360VVPlook
at8361INat
the8362DTthe
plain8363JJplain
language8364NNlanguage
there8365RBthere
of8366INof
trade8367NNtrade
secrets8368NNSsecret
and8369CCand
financial8370JJfinancial
and8371CCand
commercial8372JJcommercial
information8373NNinformation
that8374WDTthat
's8375VBZbe
confidential8376JJconfidential
,8377,,
and8378CCand
understand8379VVPunderstand
that8380IN/thatthat
those8381DTthose
were8382VBDbe
terms8383NNSterm
of8384INof
art8385NNart
that8386WDTthat
were8387VBDbe
used8388VVNuse
in8389INin
the8390DTthe
common8391JJcommon
law8392NNlaw
,8393,,
and8394CCand
these8395DTthese
...8396:...
these8397DTthese
words8398NNSword
did8399VVDdo
n't8400RBn't
fall8401VVfall
from8402INfrom
the8403DTthe
sky8404NNsky
and8405CCand
just8406RBjust
randomly8407RBrandomly
appear8408VVappear
here8409RBhere
.8410SENT.
They8411PPthey
chose8412VVDchoose
common8413JJcommon
law8414NNlaw
terms8415NNSterm
,8416,,
trade8417NNtrade
secrets8418NNSsecret
and8419CCand
the8420DTthe
closely8421RBclosely
related8422VVNrelate
commercial8423JJcommercial
confidential8424JJconfidential
information8425NNinformation
.8426SENT.
And8427CCand
the8428DTthe
courts8429NNScourt
have8430VHPhave
used8431VVNuse
and8432CCand
the8433DTthe
rules8434NNSrule
and8435CCand
the8436DTthe
statutes8437NNSstatute
have8438VHPhave
referred8439VVNrefer
to8440TOto
those8441DTthose
two8442CDtwo
bodies8443NNSbody
together8444RBtogether
.8445SENT.
And8446CCand
if8447INif
you8448PPyou
look8449VVPlook
at8450INat
this8451DTthis
Court8452NPCourt
's8453POS's
decision8454NNdecision
in8455INin
FMOC8456NPFMOC
versus8457CCversus
Merrill8458NPMerrill
,8459,,
you8460PPyou
were8461VBDbe
there8462RBthere
saying8463VVGsay
,8464,,
regarding8465VVGregard
a8466DTa
different8467JJdifferent
exemption8468NNexemption
as8469RBas
to8470TOto
privileges8471NNSprivilege
,8472,,
we8473PPwe
're8474VBPbe
going8475VVGgo
to8476TOto
protect8477VVprotect
trade8478NNtrade
secrets8479NNSsecret
and8480CCand
confidential8481JJconfidential
business8482NNbusiness
information8483NNinformation
,8484,,
because8485INbecause
those8486DTthose
...8487:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]8488LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
The8489DTthe
problem8490NNproblem
I8491PPI
have8492VHPhave
is8493VBZbe
that8494IN/thatthat
the8495DTthe
common8496JJcommon
law8497NNlaw
did8498VVDdo
n't8499RBn't
use8500VVuse
it8501PPit
the8502DTthe
way8503NNway
...8504:...
did8505VVDdo
n't8506RBn't
borrow8507VVborrow
a8508DTa
term8509NNterm
of8510INof
art8511NNart
.8512SENT.
This8513DTthis
says8514VVZsay
trade8515NNtrade
secrets8516NNSsecret
and8517CCand
financial8518JJfinancial
and8519CCand
commercial8520JJcommercial
materials8521NNSmaterial
,8522,,
but8523CCbut
that8524DTthat
's8525VBZbe
not8526RBnot
how8527WRBhow
the8528DTthe
...8529:...
how8530WRBhow
the8531DTthe
common8532JJcommon
law8533NNlaw
used8534VVDuse
it8535PPit
.8536SENT.
The8537DTthe
common8538JJcommon
law8539NNlaw
used8540VVNuse
other8541JJother
words8542NNSword
,8543,,
like8544INlike
private8545JJprivate
commercial8546JJcommercial
information8547NNinformation
or8548CCor
other8549JJother
sorts8550NNSsort
of8551INof
words8552NNSword
.8553SENT.
So8554RBso
it8555PPit
's8556VBZbe
not8557RBnot
a8558DTa
direct8559JJdirect
taking8560NNtaking
from8561INfrom
the8562DTthe
common8563JJcommon
law8564NNlaw
.8565SENT.
[MR. LOEB]8566LOC[MR. LOEB]
No8567NPNo
,8568,,
it8569PPit
's8570VBZbe
not8571RBnot
like8572INlike
the8573DTthe
word8574NNword
"8575``"
fraud8576NNfraud
"8577''"
and8578CCand
...8579:...
every8580DTevery
time8581NNtime
the8582DTthe
word8583NNword
"8584``"
fraud8585NNfraud
"8586''"
is8587VBZbe
used8588VVNuse
,8589,,
you8590PPyou
would8591MDwould
look8592VVlook
at8593INat
the8594DTthe
common8595JJcommon
law8596NNlaw
,8597,,
but8598CCbut
this8599DTthis
is8600VBZbe
a8601DTa
...8602:...
it8603PPit
was8604VBDbe
clear8605JJclear
that8606IN/thatthat
the8607DTthe
restatement8608NNrestatement
and8609CCand
the8610DTthe
common8611JJcommon
law8612NNlaw
had8613VHDhave
two8614CDtwo
boxes8615NNSbox
of8616INof
protected8617JJprotected
business8618NNbusiness
information8619NNinformation
,8620,,
trade8621NNtrade
secrets8622NNSsecret
and8623CCand
confidential8624JJconfidential
commercial8625NNcommercial
...8626:...
commercial8627JJcommercial
and8628CCand
financial8629JJfinancial
information8630NNinformation
.8631SENT.
And8632CCand
for8633INfor
both8634DTboth
of8635INof
them8636PPthem
,8637,,
they8638PPthey
required8639VVDrequire
some8640DTsome
showing8641NNshowing
of8642INof
...8643:...
of8644INof
...8645:...
of8646INof
significant8647JJsignificant
...8648:...
of8649INof
competitive8650JJcompetitive
harm8651NNharm
.8652SENT.
It8653PPit
was8654VBDbe
n't8655RBn't
to8656TOto
turn8657VVturn
on8658INon
...8659:...
on8660INon
the8661DTthe
particular8662JJparticular
unilateral8663JJunilateral
view8664NNview
of8665INof
the8666DTthe
submitter8667NNsubmitter
.8668SENT.
So8669INso
I8670PPI
...8671:...
I8672PPI
...8673:...
I8674PPI
think8675VVPthink
that8676WDTthat
's8677VBZbe
...8678:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]8679LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
You8680PPyou
'd8681MDwould
agree8682VVagree
,8683,,
though8684RBthough
,8685,,
that8686IN/thatthat
when8687WRBwhen
...8688:...
when8689WRBwhen
Congress8690NPCongress
uses8691VVZuse
words8692NNSword
that8693WDTthat
are8694VBPbe
different8695JJdifferent
from8696INfrom
common8697JJcommon
law8698NNlaw
terms8699NNSterm
that8700WDTthat
are8701VBPbe
invested8702VVNinvest
with8703INwith
meaning8704NNmeaning
,8705,,
we8706PPwe
usually8707RBusually
presume8708VVPpresume
that8709IN/thatthat
it8710PPit
means8711VVZmean
something8712NNsomething
different8713JJdifferent
?8714SENT?
[MR. LOEB]8715LOC[MR. LOEB]
I8716PPI
...8717:...
I8718PPI
think8719VVPthink
here8720RBhere
that8721IN/thatthat
common8722JJcommon
law8723NNlaw
developed8724VVNdevelop
in8725INin
a8726DTa
way8727NNway
where8728WRBwhere
they8729PPthey
're8730VBPbe
talking8731VVGtalk
about8732INabout
a8733DTa
class8734NNclass
of8735INof
information8736NNinformation
and8737CCand
it8738PPit
's8739VBZbe
clear8740JJclear
that8741IN/thatthat
Congress8742NPCongress
is8743VBZbe
referring8744VVGrefer
to8745TOto
that8746DTthat
class8747NNclass
information8748NNinformation
.8749SENT.
It8750PPit
's8751VBZbe
not8752RBnot
...8753:...
so8754RBso
this8755DTthis
is8756VBZbe
not8757RBnot
a8758DTa
...8759:...
a8760DTa
term8761NNterm
of8762INof
art8763NNart
where8764WRBwhere
you8765PPyou
have8766VHPhave
like8767INlike
one8768CDone
word8769NNword
which8770WDTwhich
triggers8771VVZtrigger
it8772PPit
.8773SENT.
You're8774NNYou're
...8775:...
you8776PPyou
're8777VBPbe
clearly8778RBclearly
talking8779VVGtalk
about8780INabout
that8781DTthat
same8782JJsame
second8783JJsecond
box8784NNbox
of8785INof
information8786NNinformation
,8787,,
which8788WDTwhich
has8789VHZhave
been8790VBNbe
protected8791VVNprotect
by8792INby
the8793DTthe
common8794JJcommon
law8795NNlaw
and8796CCand
is8797VBZbe
being8798VBGbe
...8799:...
is8800VBZbe
being8801VBGbe
referred8802VVNrefer
to8803TOto
here8804RBhere
by8805INby
the8806DTthe
reference8807NNreference
to8808TOto
commercial8809JJcommercial
and8810CCand
financial8811JJfinancial
confidential8812JJconfidential
information8813NNinformation
.8814SENT.
You8815PPyou
'll8816MDwill
see8817VVsee
again8818RBagain
and8819CCand
again8820RBagain
in8821INin
the8822DTthe
courts8823NNScourt
,8824,,
in8825INin
the8826DTthe
rules8827NNSrule
,8828,,
in8829INin
sealing8830VVGseal
rules8831NNSrule
,8832,,
in8833INin
the8834DTthe
Federal8835NPFederal
Rules8836NPSRules
of8837INof
Procedure8838NPProcedure
,8839,,
likewise8840RBlikewise
speak8841VVspeak
to8842TOto
the8843DTthe
same8844JJsame
classes8845NNSclass
of8846INof
trade8847NNtrade
secrets8848NNSsecret
and8849CCand
confidential8850JJconfidential
business8851NNbusiness
information8852NNinformation
,8853,,
and8854CCand
all8855DTall
of8856INof
them8857PPthem
require8858VVPrequire
some8859DTsome
level8860NNlevel
of8861INof
harm8862NNharm
.8863SENT.
None8864NNnone
of8865INof
them8866PPthem
just8867RBjust
turn8868VVPturn
on8869INon
...8870:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]8871LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I8872PPI
agree8873VVPagree
with8874INwith
that8875DTthat
,8876,,
but8877CCbut
what8878WPwhat
...8879:...
what8880WPwhat
happens8881VVZhappen
if8882INif
...8883:...
if8884INif
the8885DTthe
company8886NNcompany
,8887,,
a8888DTa
firm8889NNfirm
,8890,,
A8891NPA
,8892,,
says8893VVZsay
to8894TOto
a8895DTa
group8896NNgroup
of8897INof
customers8898NNScustomer
,8899,,
we8900PPwe
would8901MDwould
like8902VVlike
some8903DTsome
information8904NNinformation
from8905INfrom
you8906PPyou
which8907WDTwhich
is8908VBZbe
private8909JJprivate
,8910,,
it8911PPit
'll8912MDwill
help8913VVhelp
us8914PPus
in8915INin
our8916PP$our
business8917NNbusiness
.8918SENT.
And8919CCand
they8920PPthey
say8921VVPsay
,8922,,
whoa8923NNwhoa
,8924,,
no8925UHno
,8926,,
I8927PPI
do8928VVPdo
n't8929RBn't
want8930VVwant
this8931DTthis
to8932TOto
get8933VVget
out8934RPout
.8935SENT.
They8936PPthey
say8937VVPsay
,8938,,
we8939PPwe
promise8940VVPpromise
it8941PPit
won8942MDwill
't8943RB't
,8944,,
and8945CCand
if8946INif
it8947PPit
ever8948RBever
should8949MDshould
,8950,,
we8951PPwe
'll8952MDwill
pay8953VVpay
you8954PPyou
a8955DTa
lot8956NNlot
of8957INof
money8958NNmoney
.8959SENT.
Lo8960NPLo
and8961CCand
behold8962VVbehold
,8963,,
it8964PPit
's8965VBZbe
made8966VVNmake
public8967JJpublic
.8968SENT.
It8969PPit
does8970VVZdo
n't8971RBn't
hurt8972VVhurt
them8973PPthem
commercially8974RBcommercially
in8975INin
the8976DTthe
term8977NNterm
of8978INof
competition8979NNcompetition
,8980,,
but8981CCbut
it8982PPit
does8983VVZdo
hurt8984VVhurt
them8985PPthem
because8986INbecause
they8987PPthey
have8988VHPhave
to8989TOto
pay8990VVpay
a8991DTa
lot8992NNlot
of8993INof
money8994NNmoney
.8995SENT.
Now8996RBnow
does8997VVZdo
that8998DTthat
fall8999NNfall
within9000INwithin
the9001DTthe
statute9002NNstatute
as9003INas
you9004PPyou
understand9005VVPunderstand
it9006PPit
?9007SENT?
[MR. LOEB]9008LOC[MR. LOEB]
Well9009UHwell
,9010,,
I9011PPI
mean9012VVPmean
,9013,,
your9014PP$your
analogy9015NNanalogy
speaks9016VVZspeak
to9017TOto
a9018DTa
private9019JJprivate
party9020NNparty
getting9021VVGget
...9022:...
a9023DTa
company9024NNcompany
getting9025VVGget
private9026JJprivate
information9027NNinformation
.9028SENT.
[JUSTICE BREYER]9029LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah9030NPYeah
,9031,,
yeah9032RByeah
,9033,,
and9034CCand
,9035,,
of9036INof
course9037NNcourse
...9038:...
[MR. LOEB]9039LOC[MR. LOEB]
And9040CCand
would9041MDwould
there9042RBthere
be9043VBbe
any9044DTany
...9045:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9046LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
That9047DTthat
's9048VBZbe
right9049JJright
.9050SENT.
And9051CCand
then9052RBthen
they9053PPthey
give9054VVPgive
it9055PPit
to9056TOto
the9057DTthe
government9058NNgovernment
,9059,,
and9060CCand
they9061PPthey
...9062:...
they9063PPthey
use9064VVPuse
it9065PPit
and9066CCand
,9067,,
you9068PPyou
know9069VVPknow
,9070,,
all9071PDTall
the9072DTthe
rest9073NNrest
takes9074VVZtake
place9075NNplace
as9076RBas
is9077VBZbe
.9078SENT.
[MR. LOEB]9079LOC[MR. LOEB]
All9080DTall
right9081NNright
.9082SENT.
So9083RBso
there9084EXthere
could9085MDcould
be9086VBbe
a9087DTa
breach9088NNbreach
of9089INof
contract9090NNcontract
in9091INin
that9092DTthat
situation9093NNsituation
...9094:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9095LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah9096NPYeah
.9097SENT.
[MR. LOEB]9098LOC[MR. LOEB]
...9099:...
there9100EXthere
is9101VBZbe
a9102DTa
contract9103NNcontract
,9104,,
and9105CCand
there9106EXthere
could9107MDcould
be9108VBbe
damages9109NNSdamage
under9110INunder
this9111DTthis
contract9112NNcontract
...9113:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9114LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Yeah9115NPYeah
.9116SENT.
[MR. LOEB]9117LOC[MR. LOEB]
...9118:...
but9119CCbut
we9120PPwe
're9121VBPbe
talking9122VVGtalk
about9123INabout
a9124DTa
class9125NNclass
of9126INof
information9127NNinformation
...9128:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9129LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Well9130UHWell
,9131,,
all9132DTall
right9133NNright
.9134SENT.
But9135CCbut
does9136VVZdo
the9137DTthe
government9138NNgovernment
...9139:...
does9140VVZdo
that9141DTthat
fall9142NNfall
within9143INwithin
the9144DTthe
exemption9145NNexemption
?9146SENT?
If9147INif
the9148DTthe
government9149NNgovernment
gets9150VVZget
the9151DTthe
information9152NNinformation
,9153,,
does9154VVZdo
that9155IN/thatthat
fall9156NNfall
within9157INwithin
the9158DTthe
exemption9159NNexemption
?9160SENT?
Because9161INbecause
it9162PPit
was9163VBDbe
confidential9164JJconfidential
information9165NNinformation
,9166,,
the9167DTthe
company9168NNcompany
was9169VBDbe
harmed9170VVNharm
through9171INthrough
its9172PP$its
release9173NNrelease
.9174SENT.
It9175PPit
's9176VBZbe
just9177RBjust
hard9178JJhard
to9179TOto
say9180VVsay
that9181IN/thatthat
that9182DTthat
was9183VBDbe
competitive9184JJcompetitive
harm9185NNharm
.9186SENT.
They9187PPthey
may9188MDmay
have9189VHhave
had9190VHNhave
to9191TOto
pay9192VVpay
429193CD@card@
million9194CDmillion
dollars9195NNSdollar
,9196,,
I9197PPI
do9198VVPdo
n't9199RBn't
know9200VVknow
how9201WRBhow
much9202JJmuch
,9203,,
but9204CCbut
...9205:...
but9206CCbut
it9207PPit
was9208VBDbe
harm9209NNharm
.9210SENT.
And9211CCand
it9212PPit
was9213VBDbe
confidential9214JJconfidential
.9215SENT.
So9216RBso
it9217PPit
's9218VBZbe
literally9219RBliterally
within9220INwithin
the9221DTthe
statute9222NNstatute
.9223SENT.
[MR. LOEB]9224LOC[MR. LOEB]
I9225PPI
...9226:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9227LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And9228CCand
I9229PPI
want9230VVPwant
to9231TOto
know9232VVknow
about9233INabout
that9234DTthat
.9235SENT.
[MR. YANG]9236LOC[MR. YANG]
I9237PPI
do9238VVPdo
n't9239RBn't
...9240:...
I9241PPI
do9242VVPdo
n't9243RBn't
think9244VVthink
it9245PPit
would9246MDwould
be9247VBbe
within9248INwithin
the9249DTthe
statute9250NNstatute
.9251SENT.
The9252DTthe
statute9253NNstatute
's9254VBZbe
referring9255VVGrefer
to9256TOto
commercial9257JJcommercial
and9258CCand
financial9259JJfinancial
information9260NNinformation
that9261WDTthat
's9262VBZbe
obtained9263VVNobtain
from9264INfrom
...9265:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]9266LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
No9267RBno
,9268,,
it9269PPit
is9270VBZbe
commercial9271JJcommercial
and9272CCand
financial9273JJfinancial
information9274NNinformation
.9275SENT.
That9276DTthat
's9277VBZbe
what9278WPwhat
it9279PPit
is9280VBZbe
.9281SENT.
I9282PPI
just9283RBjust
...9284:...
you9285PPyou
...9286:...
you9287PPyou
do9288VVPdo
...9289:...
go9290VVgo
that9291DTthat
way9292NNway
.9293SENT.
I9294PPI
'll9295MDwill
just9296RBjust
assume9297VVassume
it9298PPit
into9299INinto
my9300PP$my
hypothetical9301JJhypothetical
.9302SENT.
[9303SYM[
LAUGHTER9304NNlaughter
]9305SYM]
[JUSTICE BREYER]9306LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
I9307PPI
'm9308VBPbe
still9309RBstill
focusing9310VVGfocus
on9311INon
what9312WPwhat
words9313NNSword
...9314:...
you9315PPyou
do9316VVPdo
n't9317RBn't
have9318VHhave
to9319TOto
write9320VVwrite
this9321DTthis
,9322,,
but9323CCbut
I9324PPI
might9325MDmight
.9326SENT.
[9327SYM[
LAUGHTER9328NNlaughter
]9329SYM]
[JUSTICE BREYER]9330LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
And9331CCand
I9332PPI
...9333:...
and9334CCand
I9335PPI
have9336VHPhave
...9337:...
and9338CCand
I9339PPI
have9340VHPhave
to9341TOto
write9342VVwrite
down9343RPdown
something9344NNsomething
by9345INby
the9346DTthe
word9347NNword
"9348``"
harm9349NNharm
,9350,,
"9351''"
and9352CCand
that9353DTthat
word9354NNword
...9355:...
that9356DTthat
word9357NNword
"9358``"
competitive9359JJcompetitive
harm9360NNharm
"9361''"
is9362VBZbe
still9363RBstill
giving9364VVGgive
me9365PPme
some9366DTsome
trouble9367NNtrouble
,9368,,
and9369CCand
I'm9370NPI'm
...9371:...
that9372WDTthat
's9373VBZbe
why9374WRBwhy
I9375PPI
'm9376VBPbe
asking9377VVGask
these9378DTthese
questions9379NNSquestion
.9380SENT.
[MR. LOEB]9381LOC[MR. LOEB]
Right9382RBright
.9383SENT.
Well9384UHwell
,9385,,
it9386PPit
...9387:...
it9388PPit
has9389VHZhave
to9390TOto
be9391VBbe
obtained9392VVNobtain
from9393INfrom
a9394DTa
person9395NNperson
and9396CCand
you9397PPyou
look9398VVPlook
at9399INat
whether9400INwhether
there9401EXthere
was9402VBDbe
harm9403NNharm
to9404TOto
that9405DTthat
...9406:...
that9407IN/thatthat
party9408NNparty
who9409WPwho
is9410VBZbe
...9411:...
who9412WPwho
it9413PPit
was9414VBDbe
obtained9415VVNobtain
from9416INfrom
,9417,,
which9418WDTwhich
would9419MDwould
be9420VBbe
the9421DTthe
...9422:...
the9423DTthe
company9424NNcompany
or9425CCor
...9426:...
and9427CCand
if9428INif
it9429PPit
...9430:...
but9431CCbut
if9432INif
it9433PPit
was9434VBDbe
information9435NNinformation
that9436IN/thatthat
pertained9437VVNpertain
to9438TOto
the9439DTthe
individual9440NNindividual
,9441,,
it9442PPit
could9443MDcould
perhaps9444RBperhaps
be9445VBbe
protected9446VVNprotect
by9447INby
other9448JJother
provisions9449NNSprovision
,9450,,
like9451INlike
the9452DTthe
Privacy9453NNprivacy
Act9454NNact
,9455,,
to9456TOto
...9457:...
to9458TOto
...9459:...
to9460TOto
...9461:...
extends9462VVZextend
to9463TOto
a9464DTa
large9465JJlarge
degree9466NNdegree
of9467INof
...9468:...
of9469INof
information9470NNinformation
regarding9471VVGregard
a9472DTa
particular9473JJparticular
individual9474JJindividual
citizen9475NNcitizen
,9476,,
which9477WDTwhich
is9478VBZbe
possessed9479VVNpossess
by9480INby
the9481DTthe
government9482NNgovernment
,9483,,
which9484WDTwhich
then9485RBthen
should9486MDshould
n't9487RBn't
be9488VBbe
disclosed9489VVNdisclose
.9490SENT.
So9491RBso
there9492EXthere
are9493VBPbe
other9494JJother
exemptions9495NNSexemption
that9496WDTthat
cover9497VVPcover
information9498NNinformation
which9499WDTwhich
goes9500VVZgo
to9501TOto
private9502JJprivate
information9503NNinformation
of9504INof
an9505DTan
individual9506NNindividual
.9507SENT.
Here9508RBhere
,9509,,
we9510PPwe
're9511VBPbe
talking9512VVGtalk
about9513RBabout
commercial9514JJcommercial
and9515CCand
financial9516JJfinancial
information9517NNinformation
.9518SENT.
It9519PPit
was9520VBDbe
enacted9521VVNenact
together9522RBtogether
with9523INwith
trade9524NNtrade
secrets9525NNSsecret
,9526,,
both9527CCboth
being9528VBGbe
common9529JJcommon
law9530NNlaw
terms9531NNSterm
,9532,,
and9533CCand
it9534PPit
would9535MDwould
be9536VBbe
inappropriate9537JJinappropriate
to9538TOto
sort9539VVsort
of9540INof
expand9541VVexpand
it9542PPit
to9543TOto
a9544DTa
global9545JJglobal
confidentiality9546NNconfidentiality
term9547NNterm
.9548SENT.
Here9549RBhere
,9550,,
you9551PPyou
know9552VVPknow
,9553,,
FMI9554NPFMI
is9555VBZbe
basically9556RBbasically
suggesting9557VVGsuggest
a9558DTa
unilateral9559JJunilateral
approach9560NNapproach
to9561TOto
say9562VVsay
as9563RBas
long9564RBlong
as9565INas
they9566PPthey
treat9567VVPtreat
it9568PPit
as9569INas
secret9570JJsecret
and9571CCand
confidential9572JJconfidential
,9573,,
that9574IN/thatthat
this9575DTthis
Court9576NPCourt
should9577MDshould
fall9578VVfall
in9579INin
line9580NNline
as9581INas
well9582RBwell
.9583SENT.
That9584DTthat
would9585MDwould
dramatically9586RBdramatically
alter9587VValter
the9588DTthe
scheme9589NNscheme
of9590INof
FOIA9591NPFOIA
,9592,,
the9593DTthe
one9594CDone
which9595WDTwhich
...9596:...
Congress9597NPCongress
has9598VHZhave
reenacted9599VVNreenact
Exemption9600NPExemption
49601CD4
for9602INfor
269603CD@card@
times9604NNStime
,9605,,
again9606RBagain
and9607CCand
again9608RBagain
after9609INafter
there9610EXthere
was9611VBDbe
a9612DTa
...9613:...
a9614DTa
universal9615JJuniversal
reading9616NNreading
of9617INof
this9618DTthis
provision9619NNprovision
.9620SENT.
First9621JJfirst
of9622INof
all9623DTall
,9624,,
FMI9625NPFMI
's9626POS's
counsel9627NNcounsel
here9628RBhere
says9629VVZsay
that9630IN/thatthat
this9631DTthis
information9632NNinformation
is9633VBZbe
n't9634RBn't
important9635JJimportant
,9636,,
does9637VVZdo
n't9638RBn't
show9639VVshow
what9640WPwhat
the9641DTthe
government9642NNgovernment
is9643VBZbe
up9644RBup
to9645TOto
.9646SENT.
How9647WRBHow
the9648DTthe
government9649NNgovernment
spends9650VVZspend
its9651PP$its
own9652JJown
money9653NNmoney
is9654VBZbe
critical9655JJcritical
information9656NNinformation
that9657IN/thatthat
the9658DTthe
press9659NNpress
and9660CCand
the9661DTthe
public9662JJpublic
need9663NNneed
to9664TOto
know9665VVknow
.9666SENT.
It9667PPit
's9668VBZbe
the9669DTthe
type9670NNtype
of9671INof
information9672NNinformation
that9673IN/thatthat
FOIA9674NPFOIA
has9675VHZhave
been9676VBNbe
used9677VVNuse
for9678INfor
decades9679NNSdecade
to9680TOto
reveal9681VVreveal
,9682,,
you9683PPyou
know9684VVPknow
,9685,,
the9686DTthe
Navy9687NPNavy
using9688VVGuse
...9689:...
spending9690VVGspend
$9691$$
6709692CD@card@
on9693INon
toilet9694NNtoilet
seats9695NNSseat
,9696,,
to9697TOto
the9698DTthe
bail-out9699JJbail-out
funds9700NNSfund
being9701VBGbe
abused9702VVNabuse
and9703CCand
wasted9704VVNwaste
,9705,,
et9706CCet
cetera9707NPcetera
,9708,,
et9709NPet
cetera9710NPcetera
.9711SENT.
We9712PPwe
lay9713VVDlie
out9714RPout
examples9715NNSexample
in9716INin
our9717PP$our
brief9718NNbrief
.9719SENT.
Under9720INunder
their9721PP$their
test9722NNtest
,9723,,
that9724WDTthat
would9725MDwould
...9726:...
could9727MDcould
all9728RBall
now9729RBnow
be9730VBbe
claimed9731VVNclaim
confidential9732JJconfidential
by9733INby
the9734DTthe
parties9735NNSparty
saying9736VVGsay
,9737,,
look9738VVlook
,9739,,
this9740DTthis
reveals9741VVZreveal
our9742PP$our
side9743NNside
of9744INof
the9745DTthe
business9746NNbusiness
.9747SENT.
Two9748CDTwo
sides9749NNSside
of9750INof
the9751DTthe
coin9752NNcoin
.9753SENT.
You9754PPyou
spend9755VVPspend
the9756DTthe
money9757NNmoney
,9758,,
we9759PPwe
submit9760VVPsubmit
it9761PPit
.9762SENT.
We9763PPwe
did9764VVDdo
the9765DTthe
work9766NNwork
.9767SENT.
We9768PPwe
do9769VVPdo
n't9770RBn't
want9771VVwant
you9772PPyou
to9773TOto
reveal9774VVreveal
that9775DTthat
.9776SENT.
That9777DTthat
would9778MDwould
be9779VBbe
a9780DTa
...9781:...
a9782DTa
...9783:...
a9784DTa
dramatic9785JJdramatic
change9786NNchange
of9787INof
the9788DTthe
way9789NNway
that9790IN/thatthat
FOIA9791NPFOIA
...9792:...
FOIA9793NPFOIA
has9794VHZhave
been9795VBNbe
applied9796VVNapply
for9797INfor
more9798JJRmore
than9799INthan
409800CD@card@
years9801NNSyear
.9802SENT.
Also9803RBalso
to9804TOto
the9805DTthe
regulatory9806JJregulatory
regime9807NNregime
.9808SENT.
We9809PPwe
have9810VHPhave
...9811:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]9812LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
May9813NPmay
I9814PPI
...9815:...
may9816MDmay
I9817PPI
ask9818VVask
you9819PPyou
a9820DTa
question9821VVPquestion
about9822RBabout
now9823RBnow
...9824:...
now9825RBnow
that9826IN/thatthat
the9827DTthe
...9828:...
the9829DTthe
circuit9830NNcircuit
court9831NNcourt
was9832VBDbe
wrong9833JJwrong
about9834INabout
Exemption9835NPExemption
39836CD3
under9837INunder
the9838DTthe
clarification9839NNclarification
that9840IN/thatthat
Congress9841NPCongress
provided9842VVDprovide
,9843,,
so9844RBso
are9845VBPbe
we9846PPwe
supposed9847VVNsuppose
to9848TOto
just9849RBjust
ignore9850VVignore
that9851DTthat
?9852SENT?
That's9853NNSThat's
...9854:...
[MR. LOEB]9855LOC[MR. LOEB]
Well9856UHwell
,9857,,
we9858PPwe
...9859:...
we9860PPwe
do9861VVPdo
n't9862RBn't
believe9863VVbelieve
that9864DTthat
...9865:...
that9866IN/thatthat
the9867DTthe
...9868:...
the9869DTthe
new9870JJnew
version9871NNversion
of9872INof
20189873CD@card@
(9874((
c9875LSc
)9876))
changes9877VVZchange
the9878DTthe
law9879NNlaw
about9880INabout
this9881DTthis
case9882NNcase
at9883INat
all9884DTall
.9885SENT.
It9886PPit
's9887VBZbe
prospective9888JJprospective
.9889SENT.
This9890DTthis
is9891VBZbe
information9892NNinformation
that9893WDTthat
was9894VBDbe
submitted9895VVNsubmit
under9896INunder
that9897DTthat
amendment9898NNamendment
.9899SENT.
And9900CCand
we9901PPwe
do9902VVPdo
n't9903RBn't
think9904VVthink
that9905DTthat
...9906:...
that9907DTthat
amendment9908NNamendment
also9909RBalso
applies9910VVZapply
to9911TOto
the9912DTthe
application9913NNapplication
process9914NNprocess
,9915,,
not9916RBnot
to9917TOto
the9918DTthe
...9919:...
the9920DTthe
monthly9921JJmonthly
and9922CCand
annual9923JJannual
data9924NNSdatum
that9925DTthat
we're9926NNwe're
...9927:...
we9928PPwe
're9929VBPbe
seeking9930VVGseek
here9931RBhere
.9932SENT.
But9933CCbut
,9934,,
as9935INas
some9936DTsome
earlier9937JJRearly
questions9938NNSquestion
pointed9939VVDpoint
out9940RPout
,9941,,
if9942INif
the9943DTthe
government9944NNgovernment
wants9945VVZwant
to9946TOto
seek9947VVseek
relief9948NNrelief
on9949INon
remand9950NNremand
,9951,,
if9952INif
you9953PPyou
rule9954VVPrule
for9955INfor
us9956PPus
and9957CCand
it9958PPit
goes9959VVZgo
back9960RBback
,9961,,
they9962PPthey
can9963MDcan
go9964VVgo
to9965TOto
the9966DTthe
district9967NNdistrict
court9968NNcourt
before9969INbefore
the9970DTthe
information9971NNinformation
is9972VBZbe
...9973:...
is9974VBZbe
disclosed9975VVNdisclose
and9976CCand
say9977VVPsay
we9978PPwe
want9979VVPwant
to9980TOto
reopen9981VVreopen
the9982DTthe
judgment9983NNjudgment
based9984VVNbase
on9985INon
a9986DTa
change9987NNchange
of9988INof
the9989DTthe
law9990NNlaw
.9991SENT.
And9992CCand
we9993PPwe
could9994MDcould
litigate9995VVlitigate
that9996IN/thatthat
here9997RBhere
.9998SENT.
That9999DTthat
's10000VBZbe
not10001RBnot
something10002NNsomething
to10003TOto
be10004VBbe
litigated10005VVNlitigate
in10006INin
this10007DTthis
Court10008NPCourt
,10009,,
the10010DTthe
meaning10011NNmeaning
of10012INof
201810013CD@card@
(10014((
c10015LSc
)10016))
.10017SENT.
So10018RBso
I10019PPI
do10020VVPdo
n't10021RBn't
think10022VVthink
that10023DTthat
...10024:...
that10025DTthat
...10026:...
that10027IN/thatthat
with10028INwith
...10029:...
the10030DTthe
Eighth10031JJeighth
Circuit10032NNcircuit
was10033VBDbe
correct10034JJcorrect
in10035INin
how10036WRBhow
it10037PPit
read10038VVPread
201810039RB@card@
(10040((
c10041LSc
)10042))
,10043,,
there10044EXthere
was10045VBDbe
no10046DTno
...10047:...
no10048DTno
one10049CDone
's10050VBZbe
asking10051VVGask
this10052DTthis
Court10053NPCourt
to10054TOto
review10055VVreview
that10056IN/thatthat
,10057,,
and10058CCand
the10059DTthe
new10060JJnew
amendment10061NNamendment
does10062VVZdo
n't10063RBn't
alter10064VValter
how10065WRBhow
this10066DTthis
Court10067NPCourt
should10068MDshould
dispose10069VVdispose
of10070INof
this10071DTthis
case10072NNcase
.10073SENT.
If10074INif
they10075PPthey
're10076VBPbe
...10077:...
they10078PPthey
want10079VVPwant
to10080TOto
make10081VVmake
an10082DTan
argument10083NNargument
on10084INon
remand10085NNremand
,10086,,
they10087PPthey
are10088VBPbe
free10089JJfree
to10090TOto
do10091VVdo
so10092RBso
.10093SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]10094LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
You10095PPyou
seem10096VVPseem
to10097TOto
be10098VBbe
making10099VVGmake
two10100CDtwo
distinct10101JJdistinct
arguments10102NNSargument
about10103INabout
National10104NPNational
Parks10105NPParks
.10106SENT.
One10107PPone
is10108VBZbe
National10109NPNational
Parks10110NPParks
is10111VBZbe
correct10112JJcorrect
.10113SENT.
Two10114CDTwo
,10115,,
alternatively10116RBalternatively
,10117,,
is10118VBZbe
even10119RBeven
if10120INif
National10121NPNational
Parks10122NPParks
is10123VBZbe
incorrect10124JJincorrect
,10125,,
we10126PPwe
think10127VVPthink
we10128PPwe
should10129MDshould
nonetheless10130RBnonetheless
follow10131VVfollow
it10132PPit
.10133SENT.
On10134INon
that10135DTthat
second10136JJsecond
argument10137NNargument
,10138,,
how10139WRBhow
can10140MDcan
that10141RBthat
be10142VBbe
squared10143VVNsquare
with10144INwith
Milner10145NPMilner
?10146SENT?
[MR. LOEB]10147LOC[MR. LOEB]
Again10148NPAgain
,10149,,
Milner10150NPMilner
was10151VBDbe
a10152DTa
very10153RBvery
different10154JJdifferent
concept10155NNconcept
.10156SENT.
It10157PPit
was10158VBDbe
really10159RBreally
a10160DTa
judicial10161JJjudicial
acquiescence10162NNacquiescence
to10163TOto
...10164:...
to10165TOto
Congress10166NPCongress
not10167RBnot
changing10168VVGchange
the10169DTthe
law10170NNlaw
of10171INof
...10172:...
of10173INof
Exemption10174NPExemption
210175CD2
.10176SENT.
And10177CCand
...10178:...
and10179CCand
this10180DTthis
Court10181NPCourt
's10182POS's
opinion10183NNopinion
said10184VVDsay
there10185EXthere
was10186VBDbe
n't10187RBn't
a10188DTa
judicial10189JJjudicial
consensus10190NNconsensus
,10191,,
so10192RBso
you10193PPyou
would10194MDwould
n't10195RBn't
even10196RBeven
...10197:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]10198LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Why10199NPWhy
...10200:...
[MR. LOEB]10201LOC[MR. LOEB]
...10202:...
assume10203VVassume
that10204IN/thatthat
Congress10205NPCongress
had10206VHDhave
one10207CDone
way10208NNway
or10209CCor
the10210DTthe
other10211JJother
...10212:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]10213LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Let10214VVlet
me10215PPme
take10216VVtake
it10217PPit
out10218RPout
from10219INfrom
under10220INunder
Milner10221NPMilner
then10222RBthen
and10223CCand
just10224RBjust
say10225VVsay
why10226WRBwhy
,10227,,
if10228INif
we10229PPwe
disagree10230VVPdisagree
with10231INwith
National10232NPNational
Parks10233NPParks
,10234,,
the10235DTthe
D10236NPD
.10237SENT.
C10238LSc
.10239SENT.
Circu10240NPCircu
it10241PPit
's10242VBZbe
decision10243NNdecision
,10244,,
should10245MDshould
we10246PPwe
nonetheless10247RBnonetheless
follow10248VVfollow
it10249PPit
?10250SENT?
[MR. LOEB]10251LOC[MR. LOEB]
Because10252INbecause
this10253DTthis
Court10254NPCourt
has10255VHZhave
long10256RBlong
held10257VVNhold
that10258IN/thatthat
when10259WRBwhen
Congress10260NPCongress
reenacts10261VVZreenact
a10262DTa
statute10263NNstatute
or10264CCor
revises10265VVZrevise
a10266DTa
statute10267NNstatute
that10268WDTthat
's10269VBZbe
subject10270JJsubject
to10271TOto
a10272DTa
uniform10273JJuniform
judicial10274JJjudicial
construction10275NNconstruction
,10276,,
that10277WDTthat
you10278PPyou
presume10279VVPpresume
that10280IN/thatthat
Congress10281NPCongress
understands10282VVZunderstand
and10283CCand
knows10284VVZknow
that10285DTthat
construction10286NNconstruction
,10287,,
has10288VHZhave
adopted10289VVNadopt
it10290PPit
in10291INin
its10292PP$its
...10293:...
in10294INin
its10295PP$its
ratification10296NNratification
,10297,,
in10298INin
its10299PP$its
...10300:...
in10301INin
its10302PP$its
amendment10303NNamendment
to10304TOto
the10305DTthe
statute10306NNstatute
.10307SENT.
But10308CCbut
here10309RBhere
you10310PPyou
have10311VHPhave
...10312:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]10313LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
The10314DTthe
construction10315NNconstruction
was10316VBDbe
changed10317VVNchange
in10318INin
critical10319JJcritical
mass10320NNmass
in10321INin
some10322DTsome
significant10323JJsignificant
respect10324NNrespect
,10325,,
correct10326JJcorrect
?10327SENT?
[MR. LOEB]10328LOC[MR. LOEB]
Not10329RBnot
correct10330JJcorrect
,10331,,
Your10332PP$your
Honor10333NPHonor
.10334SENT.
So10335INso
critical10336JJcritical
mass10337NNmass
was10338VBDbe
just10339RBjust
an10340DTan
application10341NNapplication
of10342INof
prong10343NNprong
one10344CDone
.10345SENT.
So10346INso
prong10347NNprong
one10348PPone
says10349VVZsay
,10350,,
look10351VVlook
,10352,,
if10353INif
...10354:...
as10355INas
to10356TOto
whether10357INwhether
disclosing10358VVGdisclose
the10359DTthe
information10360NNinformation
will10361MDwill
harm10362VVharm
the10363DTthe
government10364NNgovernment
from10365INfrom
,10366,,
in10367INin
the10368DTthe
future10369NNfuture
,10370,,
being10371VBGbe
able10372JJable
to10373TOto
get10374VVget
information10375NNinformation
,10376,,
the10377DTthe
D10378NPD
.10379SENT.
C10380LSc
.10381SENT.
Circuit10382NNcircuit
,10383,,
applying10384VVGapply
prong10385NNprong
one10386CDone
,10387,,
came10388VVDcome
up10389RPup
with10390INwith
its10391PP$its
voluntary10392NNvoluntary
/10393SYM/
involuntarily10394RBinvoluntarily
test10395NNtest
,10396,,
which10397WDTwhich
has10398VHZhave
n't10399RBn't
been10400VBNbe
followed10401VVNfollow
by10402INby
all10403PDTall
the10404DTthe
circuits10405NNScircuit
,10406,,
but10407CCbut
that10408DTthat
's10409VBZbe
just10410RBjust
an10411DTan
application10412NNapplication
of10413INof
prong10414NNprong
one10415CDone
.10416SENT.
We10417PPwe
're10418VBPbe
saying10419VVGsay
what10420WPwhat
has10421VHZhave
been10422VBNbe
uniformly10423RBuniformly
adopted10424VVNadopt
,10425,,
at10426INat
least10427JJSleast
since10428INsince
200110429CD@card@
,10430,,
is10431VBZbe
the10432DTthe
two-prong10433NNtwo-prong
test10434NNtest
.10435SENT.
One10436PPone
is10437VBZbe
to10438TOto
that10439DTthat
first10440JJfirst
prong10441NNprong
as10442RBas
to10443TOto
harm10444VVharm
to10445TOto
the10446DTthe
government10447NNgovernment
,10448,,
and10449CCand
the10450DTthe
second10451JJsecond
prong10452NNprong
is10453VBZbe
the10454DTthe
competitive10455JJcompetitive
injury10456NNinjury
.10457SENT.
So10458RBso
Congress10459NPCongress
has10460VHZhave
been10461VBNbe
well10462RBwell
aware10463JJaware
of10464INof
that10465DTthat
test10466NNtest
,10467,,
they10468PPthey
had10469VHDhave
hearings10470NNShearing
about10471INabout
it10472PPit
,10473,,
sought10474VVNseek
proposals10475NNSproposal
.10476SENT.
And10477CCand
did10478VVDdo
they10479PPthey
change10480VVchange
the10481DTthe
statute10482NNstatute
?10483SENT?
That10484DTthat
would10485MDwould
be10486VBbe
judicial10487JJjudicial
acquiescence10488NNacquiescence
we10489PPwe
're10490VBPbe
not10491RBnot
relying10492VVGrely
on10493INon
.10494SENT.
Instead10495RBinstead
,10496,,
they10497PPthey
actually10498RBactually
amended10499VVDamend
again10500RBagain
and10501CCand
again10502RBagain
,10503,,
passed10504VVDpass
statute10505NNstatute
after10506INafter
statute10507NNstatute
,10508,,
statutes10509NNSstatute
since10510INsince
200110511CD@card@
,10512,,
taking10513VVGtake
the10514DTthe
exact10515JJexact
verbatim10516JJverbatim
language10517NNlanguage
of10518INof
the10519DTthe
statute10520NNstatute
and10521CCand
a10522DTa
reference10523NNreference
to10524TOto
Exemption10525NPExemption
410526CD4
and10527CCand
saying10528VVGsay
how10529WRBhow
it10530PPit
applies10531VVZapply
to10532TOto
different10533JJdifferent
circumstances10534NNScircumstance
.10535SENT.
Again10536RBagain
,10537,,
those10538DTthose
could10539MDcould
...10540:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]10541LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
That10542DTthat
would10543MDwould
stop10544VVstop
this10545DTthis
Court10546NPCourt
from10547INfrom
saying10548VVGsay
...10549:...
this10550DTthis
Court10551NPCourt
has10552VHZhave
never10553RBnever
...10554:...
has10555VHZhave
never10556RBnever
answered10557VVNanswer
that10558DTthat
question10559NNquestion
.10560SENT.
And10561CCand
you10562PPyou
're10563VBPbe
...10564:...
you10565PPyou
're10566VBPbe
saying10567VVGsay
that10568IN/thatthat
the10569DTthe
D10570NPD
.10571SENT.
C10572LSc
.10573SENT.
Circuit10574NNcircuit
decision10575NNdecision
and10576CCand
then10577RBthen
other10578JJother
measures10579NNSmeasure
using10580VVGuse
the10581DTthe
same10582JJsame
language10583NNlanguage
stops10584VVZstop
this10585DTthis
Court10586NPCourt
from10587INfrom
saying10588VVGsay
what10589WPwhat
the10590DTthe
words10591NNSword
of10592INof
Exemption10593NPExemption
410594CD4
mean10595NNmean
?10596SENT?
[MR. LOEB]10597LOC[MR. LOEB]
No10598NPNo
,10599,,
Your10600PP$your
Honor10601NPHonor
,10602,,
it10603PPit
does10604VVZdo
n't10605RBn't
stop10606VVstop
this10607DTthis
Court10608NPCourt
.10609SENT.
But10610CCbut
this10611DTthis
Court10612NPCourt
has10613VHZhave
been10614VBNbe
deferential10615JJdeferential
to10616TOto
Congress10617NPCongress
when10618WRBwhen
it10619PPit
...10620:...
when10621WRBwhen
it10622PPit
looks10623VVZlook
to10624TOto
...10625:...
when10626WRBwhen
it10627PPit
reenacts10628VVZreenact
a10629DTa
statute10630NNstatute
and10631CCand
there10632EXthere
is10633VBZbe
a10634DTa
uniform10635JJuniform
construction10636NNconstruction
,10637,,
as10638INas
there10639EXthere
was10640VBDbe
here10641RBhere
in10642INin
eight10643CDeight
,10644,,
nine10645CDnine
different10646JJdifferent
uniform10647JJuniform
circuits10648NNScircuit
about10649INabout
the10650DTthe
two-prong10651NNtwo-prong
test10652NNtest
,10653,,
that10654WDTthat
you10655PPyou
know10656VVPknow
Congress10657NPCongress
knows10658VVZknow
about10659INabout
it10660PPit
,10661,,
it10662PPit
is10663VBZbe
...10664:...
it10665PPit
is10666VBZbe
now10667RBnow
reenacting10668VVGreenact
the10669DTthe
statute10670NNstatute
,10671,,
and10672CCand
that10673DTthat
's10674VBZbe
what10675WPwhat
this10676DTthis
Court10677NPCourt
said10678VVDsay
this10679DTthis
term10680NNterm
in10681INin
Helsinn10682NPHelsinn
.10683SENT.
There10684EXthere
was10685VBDbe
an10686DTan
appellate10687JJappellate
decision10688NNdecision
.10689SENT.
And10690CCand
it10691PPit
was10692VBDbe
they10693PPthey
took10694VVDtake
...10695:...
they10696PPthey
...10697:...
they10698PPthey
reenacted10699VVDreenact
that10700IN/thatthat
same10701JJsame
language10702NNlanguage
and10703CCand
put10704VVput
it10705PPit
into10706INinto
the10707DTthe
American10708NPAmerican
Invents10709VVZinvent
Act10710NPAct
,10711,,
right10712RBright
,10713,,
and10714CCand
this10715DTthis
Court10716NPCourt
said10717VVDsay
that10718IN/thatthat
Congress10719NPCongress
is10720VBZbe
presumed10721VVNpresume
to10722TOto
know10723VVknow
the10724DTthe
prior10725JJprior
judicial10726JJjudicial
construction10727NNconstruction
and10728CCand
is10729VBZbe
assumed10730VVNassume
to10731TOto
have10732VHhave
adopted10733VVNadopt
it10734PPit
.10735SENT.
So10736RBso
we10737PPwe
're10738VBPbe
not10739RBnot
saying10740VVGsay
you10741PPyou
're10742VBPbe
in10743INin
any10744DTany
way10745NNway
barred10746VVNbar
from10747INfrom
doing10748VVGdo
it10749PPit
,10750,,
but10751CCbut
that10752DTthat
's10753VBZbe
a10754DTa
significant10755JJsignificant
factor10756NNfactor
.10757SENT.
When10758WRBwhen
this10759DTthis
Court10760NPCourt
has10761VHZhave
found10762VVNfind
that10763DTthat
ratification10764NNratification
theory10765NNtheory
applies10766VVZapply
,10767,,
it10768PPit
has10769VHZhave
n't10770RBn't
even10771RBeven
gone10772VVNgo
on10773RPon
to10774TOto
sort10775VVsort
of10776INof
look10777NNlook
anew10778RBanew
at10779INat
the10780DTthe
statute10781NNstatute
because10782INbecause
it10783PPit
...10784:...
it10785PPit
looks10786VVZlook
...10787:...
it10788PPit
recognizes10789VVZrecognize
that10790IN/thatthat
Congress10791NPCongress
knows10792VVZknow
about10793INabout
the10794DTthe
prevailing10795JJprevailing
view10796NNview
and10797CCand
has10798VHZhave
adopted10799VVNadopt
it10800PPit
by10801INby
amending10802VVGamend
the10803DTthe
statute10804NNstatute
and10805CCand
not10806RBnot
changing10807VVGchange
it10808PPit
or10809CCor
...10810:...
or10811CCor
not10812RBnot
changing10813VVGchange
it10814PPit
in10815INin
the10816DTthe
relevant10817JJrelevant
sense10818NNsense
here10819RBhere
.10820SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]10821LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Does10822VVZdo
that10823DTthat
...10824:...
does10825VVZdo
that10826DTthat
argument10827NNargument
depend10828VVdepend
upon10829RPupon
how10830WRBhow
plausible10831JJplausible
this10832DTthis
interpretation10833NNinterpretation
would10834MDwould
be10835VBbe
as10836INas
a10837DTa
matter10838NNmatter
of10839INof
first10840JJfirst
impression10841NNimpression
?10842SENT?
[MR. LOEB]10843LOC[MR. LOEB]
Justice10844NPJustice
Alito10845NPAlito
,10846,,
I10847PPI
...10848:...
I10849PPI
do10850VVPdo
n't10851RBn't
think10852VVthink
that10853IN/thatthat
that10854DTthat
...10855:...
that10856WDTthat
is10857VBZbe
part10858NNpart
of10859INof
the10860DTthe
calculus10861NNcalculus
.10862SENT.
This10863DTthis
Court10864NPCourt
has10865VHZhave
...10866:...
has10867VHZhave
said10868VVNsay
,10869,,
has10870VHZhave
there10871RBthere
been10872VBNbe
a10873DTa
uniform10874JJuniform
construction10875NNconstruction
,10876,,
you10877PPyou
know10878VVPknow
,10879,,
and10880CCand
they10881PPthey
presume10882VVPpresume
Congress10883NPCongress
is10884VBZbe
aware10885JJaware
.10886SENT.
Here10887RBhere
,10888,,
we10889PPwe
know10890VVPknow
Congress10891NPCongress
was10892VBDbe
aware10893JJaware
of10894INof
it10895PPit
.10896SENT.
And10897CCand
here10898RBhere
we10899PPwe
do10900VVPdo
n't10901RBn't
...10902:...
we10903PPwe
have10904VHPhave
Congress10905NPCongress
enacting10906VVGenact
2910907CD@card@
different10908JJdifferent
statutes10909NNSstatute
knowing10910VVGknow
about10911INabout
the10912DTthe
uniform10913JJuniform
construction10914NNconstruction
since10915INsince
200110916CD@card@
.10917SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]10918LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
So10919RBso
,10920,,
I10921PPI
mean10922VVPmean
,10923,,
if10924INif
there10925EXthere
were10926VBDbe
a10927DTa
statute10928NNstatute
that10929WDTthat
says10930VVZsay
something10931NNsomething
has10932VHZhave
to10933TOto
be10934VBbe
done10935VVNdo
within10936INwithin
3010937CD@card@
days10938NNSday
,10939,,
and10940CCand
a10941DTa
court10942NNcourt
said10943VVDsay
3010944CD@card@
really10945RBreally
means10946VVZmean
5010947CD@card@
,10948,,
and10949CCand
all10950PDTall
the10951DTthe
other10952JJother
courts10953NNScourt
fell10954VVDfall
in10955INin
line10956NNline
,10957,,
we10958PPwe
would10959MDwould
say10960VVsay
,10961,,
all10962DTall
right10963NNright
,10964,,
that10965WDTthat
Congress10966NPCongress
has10967VHZhave
...10968:...
and10969CCand
Congress10970NPCongress
enacts10971VVZenact
statutes10972NNSstatute
related10973VVNrelate
to10974TOto
that10975DTthat
...10976:...
we10977PPwe
would10978MDwould
say10979VVsay
,10980,,
well10981RBwell
,10982,,
Congress10983NPCongress
has10984VHZhave
implicitly10985RBimplicitly
ratified10986VVNratify
that10987DTthat
?10988SENT?
[MR. LOEB]10989LOC[MR. LOEB]
Obviously10990RBobviously
,10991,,
that10992WDTthat
's10993VBZbe
a10994DTa
hard10995RBhard
hypothetical10996JJhypothetical
,10997,,
Your10998PP$your
Honor10999NPHonor
,11000,,
but11001CCbut
I11002PPI
would11003MDwould
say11004VVsay
yes11005UHyes
,11006,,
that11007WDTthat
...11008:...
that11009IN/thatthat
even11010RBeven
in11011INin
that11012DTthat
context11013NNcontext
,11014,,
that11015IN/thatthat
Congress11016NPCongress
was11017VBDbe
aware11018JJaware
of11019INof
the11020DTthe
construction11021NNconstruction
of11022INof
that11023DTthat
term11024NNterm
,11025,,
even11026RBeven
how11027WRBhow
bizarre11028JJbizarre
it11029PPit
may11030MDmay
be11031VBbe
.11032SENT.
Here11033RBhere
,11034,,
we11035PPwe
do11036VVPdo
n't11037RBn't
have11038VHhave
such11039PDTsuch
a11040DTa
bizarre11041JJbizarre
,11042,,
you11043PPyou
know11044VVPknow
,11045,,
construction11046NNconstruction
.11047SENT.
We11048PPwe
have11049VHPhave
the11050DTthe
Congress11051NPCongress
adopting11052VVGadopt
the11053DTthe
common11054JJcommon
law11055NNlaw
construction11056NNconstruction
.11057SENT.
But11058CCbut
this11059DTthis
Court11060NPCourt
has11061VHZhave
said11062VVNsay
in11063INin
Lorillard11064NPLorillard
,11065,,
in11066INin
Shapiro11067NPShapiro
,11068,,
in11069INin
Helsinn11070NPHelsinn
,11071,,
again11072RBagain
and11073CCand
again11074RBagain
,11075,,
that11076IN/thatthat
when11077WRBwhen
you11078PPyou
take11079VVPtake
language11080NNlanguage
from11081INfrom
one11082CDone
spot11083NNspot
and11084CCand
you11085PPyou
put11086VVPput
it11087PPit
into11088INinto
another11089DTanother
,11090,,
reenact11091VVreenact
it11092PPit
,11093,,
it11094PPit
contains11095VVZcontain
the11096DTthe
same11097JJsame
meaning11098NNmeaning
as11099RBas
...11100:...
as11101RBas
...11102:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]11103LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well11104UHWell
,11105,,
under11106INunder
the11107DTthe
common11108JJcommon
law11109NNlaw
,11110,,
was11111VBDbe
competitive11112JJcompetitive
harm11113NNharm
part11114NNpart
of11115INof
the11116DTthe
claim11117NNclaim
itself11118PPitself
,11119,,
or11120CCor
was11121VBDbe
it11122PPit
simply11123RBsimply
what11124WPwhat
you11125PPyou
needed11126VVDneed
to11127TOto
show11128VVshow
to11129TOto
get11130VVget
damages11131NNSdamage
?11132SENT?
[MR. LOEB]11133LOC[MR. LOEB]
For11134INfor
trade11135NNtrade
secrets11136NNSsecret
,11137,,
it11138PPit
was11139VBDbe
,11140,,
in11141INin
essence11142NNessence
,11143,,
a11144DTa
definition11145NNdefinition
of11146INof
what11147WPwhat
a11148DTa
trade11149NNtrade
secret11150NNsecret
is11151VBZbe
,11152,,
something11153NNsomething
that11154WDTthat
,11155,,
when11156WRBwhen
it11157PPit
's11158VBZbe
released11159VVNrelease
,11160,,
will11161MDwill
cause11162VVcause
competitive11163JJcompetitive
harm11164NNharm
.11165SENT.
And11166CCand
the11167DTthe
restatement11168NNrestatement
said11169VVDsay
it11170PPit
was11171VBDbe
treating11172VVGtreat
this11173DTthis
...11174:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]11175LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well11176UHWell
,11177,,
for11178INfor
things11179NNSthing
that11180WDTthat
are11181VBPbe
not11182RBnot
trade11183NNtrade
secrets11184NNSsecret
,11185,,
confidential11186JJconfidential
financial11187JJfinancial
information11188NNinformation
that11189WDTthat
is11190VBZbe
not11191RBnot
a11192DTa
trade11193NNtrade
secret11194NNsecret
.11195SENT.
[MR. LOEB]11196LOC[MR. LOEB]
The11197DTthe
courts11198NNScourt
treated11199VVDtreat
that11200IN/thatthat
same11201JJsame
confidential11202JJconfidential
business11203NNbusiness
information11204NNinformation
in11205INin
the11206DTthe
same11207JJsame
respect11208NNrespect
,11209,,
that11210WDTthat
you11211PPyou
had11212VHDhave
to11213TOto
show11214VVshow
a11215DTa
competitive11216JJcompetitive
harm11217NNharm
.11218SENT.
It11219PPit
was11220VBDbe
n't11221RBn't
just11222RBjust
injury11223NNinjury
,11224,,
because11225INbecause
you11226PPyou
could11227MDcould
show11228VVshow
injury11229NNinjury
in11230INin
lots11231NNSlot
of11232INof
different11233JJdifferent
ways11234NNSway
,11235,,
but11236CCbut
you11237PPyou
would11238MDwould
have11239VHhave
to11240TOto
show11241VVshow
actually11242RBactually
a11243DTa
competitive11244JJcompetitive
injury11245NNinjury
in11246INin
the11247DTthe
case11248NNcase
.11249SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]11250LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Is11251VBZbe
...11252:...
is11253VBZbe
there11254RBthere
a11255DTa
difference11256NNdifference
,11257,,
Mr11258NPMr
.11259SENT.
Loeb11260NPLoeb
,11261,,
for11262INfor
purposes11263NNSpurpose
of11264INof
this11265DTthis
congressional11266JJcongressional
ratification11267NNratification
argument11268NNargument
that11269IN/thatthat
the11270DTthe
court11271NNcourt
at11272INat
issue11273NNissue
was11274VBDbe
not11275RBnot
the11276DTthe
Supreme11277NPSupreme
Court11278NPCourt
,11279,,
that11280WDTthat
it11281PPit
was11282VBDbe
instead11283RBinstead
a11284DTa
circuit11285NNcircuit
court11286NNcourt
?11287SENT?
[MR. LOEB]11288LOC[MR. LOEB]
It11289PPit
...11290:...
what11291WPwhat
this11292DTthis
Court11293NPCourt
has11294VHZhave
said11295VVNsay
is11296VBZbe
if11297INif
there11298EXthere
's11299VBZbe
a11300DTa
...11301:...
a11302DTa
uniform11303JJuniform
judicial11304JJjudicial
construction11305NNconstruction
.11306SENT.
That11307DTthat
can11308MDcan
come11309VVcome
,11310,,
of11311INof
course11312NNcourse
,11313,,
from11314INfrom
the11315DTthe
Supreme11316NPSupreme
Court11317NPCourt
.11318SENT.
And11319CCand
then11320RBthen
,11321,,
if11322INif
they11323PPthey
take11324VVPtake
the11325DTthe
language11326NNlanguage
and11327CCand
reenact11328VVreenact
it11329PPit
or11330CCor
...11331:...
or11332CCor
put11333VVput
it11334PPit
from11335INfrom
this11336DTthis
statute11337NNstatute
to11338TOto
that11339DTthat
statute11340NNstatute
,11341,,
you11342PPyou
would11343MDwould
presume11344VVpresume
that11345IN/thatthat
they11346PPthey
know11347VVPknow
the11348DTthe
Supreme11349NPSupreme
Court11350NPCourt
construction11351NNconstruction
.11352SENT.
But11353CCbut
the11354DTthe
language11355NNlanguage
of11356INof
Lorillard11357NPLorillard
and11358CCand
Shapiro11359NPShapiro
and11360CCand
Helsinn11361NPHelsinn
just11362RBjust
talk11363VVtalk
about11364INabout
a11365DTa
uniform11366JJuniform
judicial11367JJjudicial
construction11368NNconstruction
.11369SENT.
And11370CCand
we11371PPwe
know11372VVPknow
from11373INfrom
Helsinn11374NPHelsinn
we11375PPwe
had11376VHDhave
just11377RBjust
the11378DTthe
Federal11379NPFederal
Circuit11380NPCircuit
construing11381VVGconstrue
the11382DTthe
prior11383JJprior
iteration11384NNiteration
,11385,,
which11386WDTwhich
was11387VBDbe
then11388RBthen
lifted11389VVNlift
into11390INinto
the11391DTthe
American11392NPAmerican
Invents11393VVZinvent
Act11394NPAct
.11395SENT.
So11396INso
that11397DTthat
principle11398NNprinciple
is11399VBZbe
one11400CDone
really11401RBreally
,11402,,
does11403VVZdo
Congress11404NPCongress
know11405VVknow
of11406INof
that11407DTthat
uniform11408JJuniform
construction11409NNconstruction
,11410,,
and11411CCand
did11412VVDdo
it11413PPit
do11414VVPdo
anything11415NNanything
about11416INabout
it11417PPit
?11418SENT?
And11419CCand
here11420RBhere
we11421PPwe
did11422VVDdo
n't11423RBn't
have11424VHhave
them11425PPthem
just11426RBjust
reenact11427VVPreenact
something11428NNsomething
once11429RBonce
or11430CCor
amend11431VVamend
the11432DTthe
statute11433NNstatute
once11434RBonce
,11435,,
but11436CCbut
some11437DTsome
...11438:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]11439LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
So11440RBso
...11441:...
so11442RBso
,11443,,
again11444RBagain
,11445,,
let11446VVlet
's11447VBZbe
say11448VVsay
we11449PPwe
just11450RBjust
had11451VHDhave
district11452NNdistrict
courts11453NNScourt
,11454,,
but11455CCbut
we11456PPwe
had11457VHDhave
uniform11458JJuniform
district11459NNdistrict
courts11460NNScourt
saying11461VVGsay
3011462CD@card@
days11463NNSday
means11464VVZmean
5011465CD@card@
days11466NNSday
.11467SENT.
That11468DTthat
's11469VBZbe
absolutely11470RBabsolutely
uniform11471JJuniform
.11472SENT.
Congress11473NPCongress
thereafter11474RBthereafter
says11475VVZsay
3011476CD@card@
days11477NNSday
,11478,,
everybody11479NNeverybody
in11480INin
America11481NPAmerica
should11482MDshould
know11483VVknow
that11484IN/thatthat
that11485WDTthat
really11486RBreally
means11487VVZmean
5011488CD@card@
.11489SENT.
The11490DTthe
average11491JJaverage
person11492NNperson
who11493WPwho
's11494VBZbe
supposed11495VVNsuppose
to11496TOto
have11497VHhave
fair11498JJfair
notice11499NNnotice
of11500INof
the11501DTthe
statutes11502NNSstatute
opens11503VVZopen
up11504RPup
the11505DTthe
books11506NNSbook
and11507CCand
sees11508VVZsee
3011509CD@card@
days11510NNSday
but11511CCbut
,11512,,
in11513INin
fact11514NNfact
,11515,,
is11516VBZbe
supposed11517VVNsuppose
to11518TOto
know11519VVknow
that11520IN/thatthat
it11521PPit
means11522VVZmean
5011523CD@card@
because11524INbecause
a11525DTa
lot11526NNlot
of11527INof
district11528NNdistrict
courts11529NNScourt
have11530VHPhave
said11531VVNsay
so11532RBso
?11533SENT?
[MR. LOEB]11534LOC[MR. LOEB]
Well11535UHwell
,11536,,
I11537PPI
do11538VVPdo
n't11539RBn't
think11540VVthink
we11541PPwe
would11542MDwould
be11543VBbe
...11544:...
this11545DTthis
Court11546NNcourt
or11547CCor
...11548:...
or11549CCor
...11550:...
we11551PPwe
're11552VBPbe
arguing11553VVGargue
that11554DTthat
...11555:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]11556LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Is11557VBZbe
that11558IN/thatthat
consistent11559JJconsistent
with11560INwith
fair11561JJfair
notice11562NNnotice
or11563CCor
due11564JJdue
process11565NNprocess
or11566CCor
any11567DTany
normal11568JJnormal
statutory11569JJstatutory
interpretation11570NNinterpretation
methodology11571NNmethodology
you11572PPyou
're11573VBPbe
familiar11574JJfamiliar
with11575INwith
?11576SENT?
[MR. LOEB]11577LOC[MR. LOEB]
In11578INin
this11579DTthis
particular11580JJparticular
case11581NNcase
,11582,,
there11583EXthere
's11584VBZbe
not11585RBnot
this11586DTthis
sort11587NNsort
of11588INof
stark11589RBstark
it11590PPit
says11591VVZsay
3011592CD@card@
and11593CCand
we11594PPwe
're11595VBPbe
reading11596VVGread
it11597PPit
to11598TOto
be11599VBbe
5011600CD@card@
.11601SENT.
And11602CCand
maybe11603RBmaybe
that11604WDTthat
's11605VBZbe
sort11606NNsort
of11607INof
an11608DTan
outlier11609NNoutlier
situation11610NNsituation
where11611WRBwhere
you11612PPyou
would11613MDwould
have11614VHhave
an11615DTan
exception11616NNexception
like11617INlike
Lorillard11618NPLorillard
.11619SENT.
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]11620LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Exception11621NNexception
for11622INfor
maybe11623RBmaybe
due11624JJdue
process11625NNprocess
and11626CCand
fair11627JJfair
notice11628NNnotice
?11629SENT?
[MR. LOEB]11630LOC[MR. LOEB]
Well11631UHWell
,11632,,
no11633DTno
one11634CDone
can11635MDcan
argue11636VVargue
that11637IN/thatthat
adopting11638VVGadopt
the11639DTthe
common11640JJcommon
law11641NNlaw
meaning11642NNmeaning
of11643INof
trade11644NNtrade
secrets11645NNSsecret
and11646CCand
business11647NNbusiness
information11648NNinformation
is11649VBZbe
a11650DTa
violation11651NNviolation
of11652INof
due11653JJdue
process11654NNprocess
.11655SENT.
And11656CCand
the11657DTthe
way11658NNway
that11659IN/thatthat
you11660PPyou
're11661VBPbe
saying11662VVGsay
days11663NNSday
versus11664CCversus
5011665CD@card@
days11666NNSday
,11667,,
I11668PPI
'll11669MDwill
give11670VVgive
you11671PPyou
that11672DTthat
.11673SENT.
That11674DTthat
's11675VBZbe
a11676DTa
much11677RBmuch
harder11678JJRhard
case11679NNcase
and11680CCand
...11681:...
and11682CCand
maybe11683RBmaybe
...11684:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]11685LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
Very11686JJVery
kind11687NNkind
of11688INof
you11689PPyou
.11690SENT.
Thank11691VVthank
you11692PPyou
.11693SENT.
[11694SYM[
LAUGHTER11695NNlaughter
]11696SYM]
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]11697LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
But11698CCbut
...11699:...
but11700RBbut
...11701:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11702LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well11703UHWell
,11704,,
but11705CCbut
...11706:...
[JUSTICE GORSUCH]11707LOC[JUSTICE GORSUCH]
...11708:...
do11709VVdo
n't11710RBn't
our11711PP$our
...11712:...
do11713VVdo
n't11714RBn't
our11715PP$our
tools11716NNStool
of11717INof
interpretation11718NNinterpretation
normally11719RBnormally
take11720VVtake
their11721PP$their
cue11722NNcue
from11723INfrom
things11724NNSthing
like11725INlike
due11726JJdue
process11727NNprocess
and11728CCand
fair11729JJfair
notice11730NNnotice
,11731,,
rather11732RBrather
than11733INthan
the11734DTthe
other11735JJother
way11736NNway
around11737RBaround
,11738,,
where11739WRBwhere
due11740JJdue
process11741NNprocess
and11742CCand
fair11743JJfair
notice11744NNnotice
have11745VHPhave
to11746TOto
become11747VVbecome
the11748DTthe
exception11749NNexception
to11750TOto
our11751PP$our
statutory11752JJstatutory
interpretation11753NNinterpretation
tools11754NNStool
?11755SENT?
[MR. LOEB]11756LOC[MR. LOEB]
But11757CCbut
it11758PPit
is11759VBZbe
an11760DTan
established11761JJestablished
statutory11762JJstatutory
interpretation11763NNinterpretation
mechanism11764NNmechanism
that11765IN/thatthat
when11766WRBwhen
Congress11767NPCongress
reenacts11768VVZreenact
a11769DTa
statute11770NNstatute
and11771CCand
there11772EXthere
's11773VBZbe
a11774DTa
uniform11775JJuniform
construction11776NNconstruction
,11777,,
even11778RBeven
if11779INif
it11780PPit
's11781VBZbe
a11782DTa
uniform11783JJuniform
circuit11784NNcircuit
construction11785NNconstruction
,11786,,
that11787WDTthat
you11788PPyou
presume11789VVPpresume
that11790IN/thatthat
Congress11791NPCongress
has11792VHZhave
adopted11793VVNadopt
that11794IN/thatthat
prior11795JJprior
judicial11796JJjudicial
construction11797NNconstruction
.11798SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11799LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
So11800INso
how11801WRBhow
many11802JJmany
...11803:...
how11804WRBhow
many11805JJmany
courts11806NNScourt
of11807INof
appeals11808NNSappeal
do11809VVPdo
you11810PPyou
have11811VHPhave
to11812TOto
take11813VVtake
...11814:...
I11815PPI
assume11816VVPassume
uniform11817NNuniform
is11818VBZbe
n't11819RBn't
enough11820JJenough
...11821:...
if11822INif
there11823EXthere
are11824VBPbe
just11825RBjust
two11826CDtwo
,11827,,
that11828WDTthat
's11829VBZbe
uniform11830JJuniform
,11831,,
but11832CCbut
you11833PPyou
have11834VHPhave
...11835:...
I11836PPI
understand11837VVPunderstand
you11838PPyou
...11839:...
you11840PPyou
think11841VVPthink
you11842PPyou
have11843VHPhave
eight11844CDeight
,11845,,
right11846RBright
?11847SENT?
[MR. LOEB]11848LOC[MR. LOEB]
At11849INat
least11850JJSleast
eight11851CDeight
,11852,,
Your11853PP$your
Honor11854NPHonor
.11855SENT.
And11856CCand
there11857EXthere
's11858VBZbe
no11859DTno
...11860:...
and11861CCand
no11862DTno
outlier11863NNoutlier
circuits11864NNScircuit
on11865INon
the11866DTthe
two-prong11867NNtwo-prong
test11868NNtest
.11869SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]11870LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Is11871VBZbe
it11872PPit
that11873IN/thatthat
,11874,,
or11875CCor
are11876VBPbe
you11877PPyou
really11878RBreally
relying11879VVGrely
on11880INon
the11881DTthe
D11882NPD
.11883SENT.
C11884LSc
.11885SENT.
Circu11886NPCircu
it11887PPit
's11888VBZbe
special11889JJspecial
situation11890NNsituation
with11891INwith
respect11892NNrespect
to11893TOto
FOIA11894NPFOIA
?11895SENT?
[MR. LOEB]11896LOC[MR. LOEB]
With11897INwith
all11898DTall
deference11899NNdeference
to11900TOto
the11901DTthe
D11902NPD
.11903SENT.
C11904LSc
.11905SENT.
Circuit11906NNcircuit
,11907,,
no11908RBno
,11909,,
there11910EXthere
's11911VBZbe
no11912DTno
special11913JJspecial
deference11914NNdeference
here11915RBhere
.11916SENT.
We11917PPwe
're11918VBPbe
looking11919VVGlook
for11920INfor
whether11921INwhether
there11922EXthere
is11923VBZbe
a11924DTa
judicial11925JJjudicial
construction11926NNconstruction
in11927INin
the11928DTthe
terms11929NNSterm
of11930INof
Helsinn11931NPHelsinn
and11932CCand
the11933DTthe
terms11934NNSterm
of11935INof
Lorillard11936NPLorillard
.11937SENT.
And11938CCand
I11939PPI
think11940VVPthink
,11941,,
when11942WRBwhen
you11943PPyou
have11944VHPhave
a11945DTa
overwhelming11946JJoverwhelming
number11947NNnumber
of11948INof
the11949DTthe
circuits11950NNScircuit
who11951WPwho
have11952VHPhave
uniformly11953RBuniformly
addressed11954VVNaddress
it11955PPit
without11956INwithout
any11957DTany
dissenting11958JJdissenting
circuits11959NNScircuit
,11960,,
that11961IN/thatthat
whatever11962WDTwhatever
that11963DTthat
standard11964NNstandard
means11965VVZmean
,11966,,
that11967IN/thatthat
it11968PPit
's11969VBZbe
...11970:...
it11971PPit
's11972VBZbe
met11973VVNmeet
in11974INin
that11975DTthat
...11976:...
in11977INin
this11978DTthis
circumstance11979NNcircumstance
.11980SENT.
It11981PPit
's11982VBZbe
really11983RBreally
quite11984RBquite
...11985:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]11986LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank11987VVthank
you11988PPyou
,11989,,
Mr11990NPMr
.11991SENT.
Young11992NPYoung
...11993:...
I11994PPI
'm11995VBPbe
sorry11996JJsorry
,11997,,
Mr11998NPMr
.11999SENT.
Loeb12000NPLoeb
.12001SENT.
Now12002RBnow
,12003,,
Mr12004NPMr
.12005SENT.
Young12006JJyoung
,12007,,
you12008PPyou
have12009VHPhave
five12010CDfive
minutes12011NNSminute
remaining12012VVGremain
.12013SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]12014LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Thank12015VVthank
you12016PPyou
,12017,,
Mr12018NPMr
.12019SENT.
Chief12020NPChief
Justice12021NPJustice
.12022SENT.
Just12023RBjust
a12024DTa
few12025JJfew
points12026NNSpoint
I12027PPI
'd12028MDwould
like12029VVlike
to12030TOto
make12031VVmake
.12032SENT.
First12033RBfirst
,12034,,
to12035TOto
start12036VVstart
with12037INwith
what12038WPwhat
"12039``"
confidential12040JJconfidential
"12041''"
means12042NNSmean
and12043CCand
its12044PP$its
relationship12045NNrelationship
to12046TOto
any12047DTany
concept12048NNconcept
of12049INof
harm12050NNharm
.12051SENT.
That12052DTthat
question12053NNquestion
of12054INof
harm12055NNharm
asks12056VVZask
a12057DTa
very12058RBvery
different12059JJdifferent
question12060NNquestion
.12061SENT.
It12062PPit
asks12063VVZask
why12064WRBwhy
someone12065NNsomeone
keeps12066VVZkeep
something12067NNsomething
secret12068NNsecret
,12069,,
not12070RBnot
whether12071INwhether
they12072PPthey
keep12073VVPkeep
it12074PPit
secret12075JJsecret
.12076SENT.
There12077EXthere
is12078VBZbe
no12079DTno
common12080JJcommon
law12081NNlaw
term12082NNterm
of12083INof
art12084NNart
called12085VVDcall
confidential12086JJconfidential
business12087NNbusiness
information12088NNinformation
or12089CCor
confidential12090JJconfidential
commercial12091JJcommercial
information12092NNinformation
.12093SENT.
It12094PPit
's12095VBZbe
not12096RBnot
...12097:...
that12098WDTthat
does12099VVZdo
not12100RBnot
appear12101VVappear
in12102INin
the12103DTthe
restatement12104NNrestatement
.12105SENT.
It12106PPit
does12107VVZdo
n't12108RBn't
appear12109VVappear
in12110INin
the12111DTthe
cases12112NNScase
that12113WDTthat
are12114VBPbe
cited12115VVNcite
.12116SENT.
It12117PPit
does12118VVZdo
n't12119RBn't
appear12120VVappear
in12121INin
any12122DTany
scholarship12123NNscholarship
.12124SENT.
And12125CCand
it12126PPit
was12127VBDbe
n't12128RBn't
something12129NNsomething
that12130IN/thatthat
either12131DTeither
National12132NPNational
Parks12133NPParks
or12134CCor
any12135DTany
other12136JJother
case12137NNcase
before12138INbefore
or12139CCor
after12140INafter
it12141PPit
relied12142VVDrely
on12143RPon
to12144TOto
find12145VVfind
some12146DTsome
common12147JJcommon
law12148NNlaw
heritage12149NNheritage
.12150SENT.
It12151PPit
's12152VBZbe
true12153JJtrue
,12154,,
of12155INof
course12156NNcourse
,12157,,
that12158IN/thatthat
when12159WRBwhen
one12160PPone
has12161VHZhave
a12162DTa
tort12163NNtort
action12164NNaction
,12165,,
any12166DTany
kind12167NNkind
of12168INof
tort12169NNtort
action12170NNaction
,12171,,
harm12172NNharm
will12173MDwill
be12174VBbe
something12175NNsomething
that12176WDTthat
has12177VHZhave
to12178TOto
be12179VBbe
shown12180VVNshow
,12181,,
but12182CCbut
that12183WDTthat
does12184VVZdo
not12185RBnot
infuse12186VVinfuse
harm12187NNharm
into12188INinto
the12189DTthe
very12190JJvery
meaning12191NNmeaning
of12192INof
other12193JJother
elements12194NNSelement
of12195INof
the12196DTthe
tort12197NNtort
.12198SENT.
We12199PPwe
know12200VVPknow
that12201IN/thatthat
from12202INfrom
cases12203NNScase
like12204INlike
Carter12205NPCarter
and12206CCand
Bruesewitz12207NPBruesewitz
that12208IN/thatthat
even12209RBeven
if12210INif
there12211EXthere
were12212VBDbe
some12213DTsome
common12214JJcommon
law12215NNlaw
conception12216NNconception
,12217,,
it12218PPit
is12219VBZbe
n't12220RBn't
enough12221JJenough
for12222INfor
Congress12223NPCongress
to12224TOto
refer12225VVrefer
to12226TOto
some12227DTsome
vague12228JJvague
principle12229NNprinciple
.12230SENT.
It12231PPit
would12232MDwould
actually12233RBactually
have12234VHhave
to12235TOto
use12236VVuse
that12237DTthat
term12238NNterm
of12239INof
art12240NNart
.12241SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12242LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Counsel12243NPCounsel
,12244,,
that12245WDTthat
...12246:...
that12247WDTthat
begs12248VVZbeg
a12249DTa
question12250NNquestion
,12251,,
which12252WDTwhich
is12253VBZbe
we12254PPwe
sort12255VVPsort
of12256INof
naturally12257RBnaturally
think12258VVPthink
that12259IN/thatthat
if12260INif
people12261NNSpeople
are12262VBPbe
going12263VVGgo
to12264TOto
keep12265VVkeep
something12266NNsomething
confidential12267JJconfidential
,12268,,
that12269IN/thatthat
there12270EXthere
's12271VBZbe
a12272DTa
reason12273NNreason
for12274INfor
it12275PPit
.12276SENT.
You12277PPyou
do12278VVPdo
n't12279RBn't
just12280RBjust
say12281VVPsay
,12282,,
I12283PPI
do12284VVPdo
n't12285RBn't
want12286VVwant
to12287TOto
disclose12288VVdisclose
because12289INbecause
I12290PPI
do12291VVPdo
n't12292RBn't
feel12293VVfeel
like12294INlike
it12295PPit
,12296,,
although12297INalthough
some12298DTsome
people12299NNSpeople
do12300VVPdo
.12301SENT.
It12302PPit
seems12303VVZseem
to12304TOto
me12305PPme
that12306IN/thatthat
this12307DTthis
concept12308NNconcept
that12309IN/thatthat
there12310EXthere
has12311VHZhave
to12312TOto
be12313VBbe
a12314DTa
reason12315NNreason
for12316INfor
it12317PPit
and12318CCand
that12319IN/thatthat
it12320PPit
has12321VHZhave
to12322TOto
be12323VBbe
tied12324VVNtie
to12325TOto
business12326NNbusiness
and12327CCand
to12328TOto
commercial12329JJcommercial
and12330CCand
financial12331JJfinancial
matters12332NNSmatter
,12333,,
because12334INbecause
that12335WDTthat
's12336VBZbe
the12337DTthe
words12338NNSword
,12339,,
financial12340JJfinancial
and12341CCand
confidential12342JJconfidential
...12343:...
financial12344JJfinancial
and12345CCand
commercial12346JJcommercial
matters12347NNSmatter
,12348,,
those12349DTthose
are12350VBPbe
the12351DTthe
words12352NNSword
of12353INof
the12354DTthe
statute12355NNstatute
,12356,,
does12357VVZdo
n't12358RBn't
that12359IN/thatthat
naturally12360RBnaturally
infuse12361VVinfuse
the12362DTthe
concept12363NNconcept
with12364INwith
some12365DTsome
sense12366NNsense
that12367IN/thatthat
there12368EXthere
's12369VBZbe
a12370DTa
reason12371NNreason
for12372INfor
keeping12373VVGkeep
it12374PPit
a12375DTa
secret12376NNsecret
?12377SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]12378LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well12379UHwell
,12380,,
I12381PPI
think12382VVPthink
it12383PPit
's12384VBZbe
likely12385JJlikely
that12386IN/thatthat
there12387EXthere
is12388VBZbe
.12389SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12390LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
And12391CCand
that12392WDTthat
has12393VHZhave
to12394TOto
...12395:...
and12396CCand
...12397:...
and12398CCand
if12399INif
there12400EXthere
is12401VBZbe
some12402DTsome
sense12403NNsense
of12404INof
it12405PPit
,12406,,
why12407WRBwhy
is12408VBZbe
n't12409RBn't
that12410DTthat
sense12411NNsense
infused12412VVNinfuse
with12413INwith
a12414DTa
concept12415NNconcept
,12416,,
if12417INif
I12418PPI
let12419VVPlet
it12420PPit
out12421RPout
,12422,,
it12423PPit
's12424VBZbe
going12425VVGgo
to12426TOto
hurt12427VVhurt
me12428PPme
?12429SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]12430LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well12431UHWell
,12432,,
again12433RBagain
,12434,,
we12435PPwe
think12436VVPthink
...12437:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12438LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Taking12439VVGtake
aside12440RPaside
the12441DTthe
quantum12442NNquantum
of12443INof
hurt12444VVNhurt
,12445,,
but12446CCbut
...12447:...
[MR. YOUNG]12448LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Right12449RBright
.12450SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12451LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...12452:...
there12453EXthere
's12454VBZbe
a12455DTa
reason12456NNreason
I12457PPI
keep12458VVPkeep
it12459PPit
a12460DTa
secret12461NNsecret
.12462SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]12463LOC[MR. YOUNG]
And12464CCand
I12465PPI
will12466MDwill
address12467VVaddress
that12468IN/thatthat
as12469RBas
well12470RBwell
.12471SENT.
But12472CCbut
I12473PPI
think12474VVPthink
that12475IN/thatthat
in12476INin
this12477DTthis
very12478JJvery
case12479NNcase
it12480PPit
maybe12481RBmaybe
is12482VBZbe
a12483DTa
good12484JJgood
exemplar12485NNexemplar
.12486SENT.
Of12487INof
course12488NNcourse
,12489,,
our12490PP$our
clients12491NNSclient
are12492VBPbe
n't12493RBn't
paying12494VVGpay
for12495INfor
us12496PPus
to12497TOto
pursue12498VVpursue
this12499DTthis
to12500TOto
this12501DTthis
level12502NNlevel
because12503INbecause
they12504PPthey
just12505RBjust
feel12506VVPfeel
like12507INlike
it12508PPit
.12509SENT.
Of12510INof
course12511NNcourse
,12512,,
we12513PPwe
think12514VVPthink
there12515EXthere
's12516VBZbe
substantial12517JJsubstantial
competitive12518JJcompetitive
harm12519NNharm
.12520SENT.
But12521CCbut
the12522DTthe
question12523NNquestion
Congress12524NPCongress
asked12525VVNask
is12526VBZbe
not12527RBnot
for12528INfor
courts12529NNScourt
to12530TOto
engage12531VVengage
in12532INin
the12533DTthe
prospective12534JJprospective
,12535,,
speculative12536JJspeculative
assessment12537NNassessment
...12538:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12539LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
But12540CCbut
that12541DTthat
's12542VBZbe
not12543RBnot
true12544JJtrue
.12545SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]12546LOC[MR. YOUNG]
...12547:...
of12548INof
whether12549INwhether
they12550PPthey
think12551VVPthink
it12552PPit
is12553VBZbe
.12554SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12555LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
If12556INif
...12557:...
if12558INif
we12559PPwe
read12560VVPread
"12561``"
confidential12562JJconfidential
"12563''"
as12564INas
being12565VBGbe
confidential12566JJconfidential
in12567INin
nature12568NNnature
,12569,,
which12570WDTwhich
is12571VBZbe
part12572NNpart
of12573INof
your12574PP$your
definition12575NNdefinition
...12576:...
[MR. YOUNG]12577LOC[MR. YOUNG]
It12578PPit
's12579VBZbe
a12580DTa
manifestation12581NNmanifestation
of12582INof
it12583PPit
.12584SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12585LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Well12586UHwell
,12587,,
it12588PPit
's12589VBZbe
...12590:...
[MR. YOUNG]12591LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Things12592NNSthing
that12593WDTthat
are12594VBPbe
confidential12595JJconfidential
in12596INin
nature12597NNnature
are12598VBPbe
likely12599JJlikely
to12600TOto
be12601VBbe
kept12602VVNkeep
secret12603JJsecret
.12604SENT.
Of12605INof
course12606NNcourse
.12607SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]12608LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Well12609UHWell
,12610,,
that12611WDTthat
's12612VBZbe
the12613DTthe
point12614NNpoint
,12615,,
which12616WDTwhich
is12617VBZbe
...12618:...
[MR. YOUNG]12619LOC[MR. YOUNG]
But12620CCbut
the12621DTthe
founder12622NNfounder
of12623INof
LifeLock12624NPLifeLock
put12625VVDput
his12626PP$his
Social12627NPSocial
Security12628NPSecurity
number12629NNnumber
up12630RBup
on12631INon
billboards12632NNSbillboard
all12633RBall
across12634INacross
the12635DTthe
country12636NNcountry
to12637TOto
prove12638VVprove
that12639IN/thatthat
his12640PP$his
technology12641NNtechnology
was12642VBDbe
so12643RBso
secure12644JJsecure
.12645SENT.
Now12646RBnow
we12647PPwe
would12648MDwould
n't12649RBn't
think12650VVthink
that12651IN/thatthat
that12652DTthat
is12653VBZbe
confidential12654JJconfidential
anymore12655RBanymore
.12656SENT.
It12657PPit
's12658VBZbe
just12659RBjust
one12660CDone
manifestation12661NNmanifestation
of12662INof
it12663PPit
.12664SENT.
Everybody12665NNEverybody
else12666RBelse
's12667VHZhave
might12668MDmight
be12669VBbe
.12670SENT.
And12671CCand
,12672,,
here12673RBhere
,12674,,
when12675WRBwhen
you12676PPyou
...12677:...
when12678WRBwhen
you12679PPyou
have12680VHPhave
this12681DTthis
bucket12682NNbucket
in12683INin
Exemption12684NPExemption
412685CD4
,12686,,
you12687PPyou
start12688VVPstart
with12689INwith
it12690PPit
being12691VBGbe
commercial12692JJcommercial
or12693CCor
financial12694JJfinancial
.12695SENT.
Those12696DTthose
are12697VBPbe
limits12698NNSlimit
.12699SENT.
Of12700INof
course12701NNcourse
,12702,,
you12703PPyou
're12704VBPbe
right12705JJright
,12706,,
if12707INif
you12708PPyou
can12709MDcan
't12710RB't
show12711NNshow
that12712IN/thatthat
it12713PPit
's12714VBZbe
commercial12715JJcommercial
or12716CCor
financial12717JJfinancial
information12718NNinformation
,12719,,
you12720PPyou
're12721VBPbe
not12722RBnot
within12723INwithin
Exemption12724NPExemption
412725CD4
.12726SENT.
Then12727RBthen
you12728PPyou
have12729VHPhave
to12730TOto
show12731VVshow
it12732PPit
's12733VBZbe
obtained12734VVNobtain
from12735INfrom
a12736DTa
person12737NNperson
.12738SENT.
That12739DTthat
's12740VBZbe
not12741RBnot
the12742DTthe
government12743NNgovernment
doing12744VVGdo
it12745PPit
,12746,,
in12747INin
other12748JJother
words12749NNSword
.12750SENT.
And12751CCand
then12752RBthen
,12753,,
lastly12754RBlastly
,12755,,
it12756PPit
has12757VHZhave
to12758TOto
be12759VBbe
confidential12760JJconfidential
or12761CCor
privileged12762JJprivileged
.12763SENT.
And12764CCand
all12765PDTall
that12766DTthat
Congress12767NPCongress
asked12768VVDask
the12769DTthe
courts12770NNScourt
to12771TOto
do12772VVdo
is12773VBZbe
answer12774VVanswer
the12775DTthe
objective12776JJobjective
question12777NNquestion
:12778::
Does12779VVZdo
the12780DTthe
person12781NNperson
whose12782WP$whose
information12783NNinformation
the12784DTthe
government12785NNgovernment
now12786RBnow
has12787VHZhave
,12788,,
does12789VVZdo
that12790DTthat
person12791NNperson
keep12792VVkeep
this12793DTthis
secret12794JJsecret
and12795CCand
not12796RBnot
publicly12797RBpublicly
disclose12798VVdisclose
it12799PPit
?12800SENT?
And12801CCand
,12802,,
if12803INif
so12804RBso
,12805,,
the12806DTthe
fact12807NNfact
,12808,,
of12809INof
course12810NNcourse
,12811,,
that12812WDTthat
likely12813RBlikely
the12814DTthe
reason12815NNreason
they12816PPthey
do12817VVPdo
that12818IN/thatthat
in12819INin
many12820JJmany
instances12821NNSinstance
is12822VBZbe
to12823TOto
protect12824VVprotect
themselves12825PPthemselves
from12826INfrom
competitive12827JJcompetitive
harm12828NNharm
,12829,,
that12830WDTthat
's12831VBZbe
not12832RBnot
something12833NNsomething
that12834IN/thatthat
courts12835NNScourt
need12836VVPneed
to12837TOto
spend12838VVspend
two12839CDtwo
days12840NNSday
on12841INon
a12842DTa
trial12843NNtrial
with12844INwith
expert12845NNexpert
witnesses12846NNSwitness
and12847CCand
leaders12848NNSleader
from12849INfrom
industry12850NNindustry
and12851CCand
all12852DTall
different12853JJdifferent
industry12854NNindustry
segments12855NNSsegment
coming12856VVGcome
in12857INin
to12858TOto
try12859VVtry
to12860TOto
persuade12861VVpersuade
a12862DTa
poor12863JJpoor
district12864NNdistrict
judge12865NNjudge
to12866TOto
figure12867VVfigure
out12868RPout
why12869WRBwhy
in12870INin
the12871DTthe
world12872NNworld
this12873DTthis
information12874NNinformation
would12875MDwould
cause12876VVcause
a12877DTa
substantial12878JJsubstantial
competitive12879JJcompetitive
harm12880NNharm
or12881CCor
not12882RBnot
.12883SENT.
Harm12884NNharm
is12885VBZbe
not12886RBnot
part12887NNpart
of12888INof
the12889DTthe
word12890NNword
confidential12891JJconfidential
.12892SENT.
It12893PPit
's12894VBZbe
often12895RBoften
associated12896VVNassociate
with12897INwith
it12898PPit
if12899INif
you12900PPyou
...12901:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]12902LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
But12903CCbut
why12904WRBwhy
not12905RBnot
call12906VVcall
it12907PPit
harm12908VVharm
,12909,,
some12910DTsome
harm12911NNharm
,12912,,
I12913PPI
mean12914VVPmean
,12915,,
some12916DTsome
harm12917NNharm
,12918,,
because12919INbecause
Congress12920NPCongress
does12921VVZdo
n't12922RBn't
go12923VVgo
around12924INaround
protecting12925VVGprotect
people12926NNSpeople
from12927INfrom
X12928NPX
where12929WRBwhere
X12930NPX
does12931VVZdo
n't12932RBn't
cause12933VVcause
any12934DTany
harm12935NNharm
.12936SENT.
That12937DTthat
would12938MDwould
be12939VBbe
not12940RBnot
there12941RBthere
in12942INin
the12943DTthe
statute12944NNstatute
,12945,,
but12946CCbut
it12947PPit
would12948MDwould
be12949VBbe
a12950DTa
general12951JJgeneral
assumption12952NNassumption
.12953SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]12954LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well12955UHWell
,12956,,
Congress12957NPCongress
spoke12958VVDspeak
broadly12959RBbroadly
...12960:...
[JUSTICE BREYER]12961LOC[JUSTICE BREYER]
Do12962VVPdo
you12963PPyou
object12964VVPobject
to12965TOto
that12966DTthat
,12967,,
saying12968VVGsay
adding12969VVGadd
to12970TOto
that12971DTthat
some12972DTsome
harm12973NNharm
?12974SENT?
[MR. YOUNG]12975LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Well12976UHWell
,12977,,
I12978PPI
...12979:...
I12980PPI
...12981:...
I12982PPI
...12983:...
I12984PPI
object12985VVPobject
to12986TOto
it12987PPit
in12988INin
this12989DTthis
sense12990NNsense
:12991::
I12992PPI
think12993VVPthink
that12994IN/thatthat
by12995INby
opening12996VVGopen
that12997DTthat
door12998NNdoor
,12999,,
you13000PPyou
now13001RBnow
are13002VBPbe
opening13003VVGopen
trial13004NNtrial
courts13005NNScourt
to13006TOto
have13007VHhave
to13008TOto
do13009VVdo
the13010DTthe
kind13011NNkind
of13012INof
tedious13013JJtedious
and13014CCand
laborious13015JJlaborious
work13016NNwork
that13017WDTthat
leads13018VVZlead
to13019TOto
false13020JJfalse
negatives13021NNSnegative
like13022INlike
this13023DTthis
case13024NNcase
.13025SENT.
It13026PPit
...13027:...
it13028PPit
really13029RBreally
is13030VBZbe
amazing13031JJamazing
that13032IN/thatthat
something13033NNsomething
like13034INlike
store-level13035JJstore-level
SNAP13036JJsnap
redemption13037NNredemption
data13038NNSdatum
would13039MDwould
lead13040VVlead
to13041TOto
a13042DTa
situation13043NNsituation
in13044INin
which13045WDTwhich
we13046PPwe
had13047VHDhave
to13048TOto
have13049VHhave
a13050DTa
trial13051NNtrial
at13052INat
all13053DTall
.13054SENT.
And13055CCand
you13056PPyou
would13057MDwould
n't13058RBn't
have13059VHhave
to13060TOto
do13061VVdo
it13062PPit
,13063,,
and13064CCand
people13065NNSpeople
are13066VBPbe
n't13067RBn't
likely13068JJlikely
to13069TOto
press13070VVpress
objections13071NNSobjection
,13072,,
if13073INif
they13074PPthey
do13075VVPdo
n't13076RBn't
have13077VHhave
any13078DTany
harm13079NNharm
that13080WDTthat
's13081VBZbe
going13082VVGgo
to13083TOto
befall13084VVbefall
them13085PPthem
.13086SENT.
And13087CCand
so13088INso
Congress13089NPCongress
solved13090VVDsolve
that13091DTthat
problem13092NNproblem
by13093INby
saying13094VVGsay
objectively13095RBobjectively
...13096:...
if13097INif
I13098PPI
might13099MDmight
just13100RBjust
finish13101VVfinish
the13102DTthe
thought13103NNthought
,13104,,
Mr13105NPMr
.13106SENT.
Chief13107NPChief
Justice13108NPJustice
.13109SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13110LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Sure13111NPSure
.13112SENT.
[MR. YOUNG]13113LOC[MR. YOUNG]
Objectively13114RBobjectively
,13115,,
if13116INif
you13117PPyou
have13118VHPhave
a13119DTa
pattern13120NNpattern
of13121INof
keeping13122VVGkeep
this13123DTthis
information13124NNinformation
secret13125NNsecret
and13126CCand
not13127RBnot
publicly13128RBpublicly
disclosing13129VVGdisclose
it13130PPit
,13131,,
that13132WDTthat
is13133VBZbe
the13134DTthe
only13135JJonly
thing13136NNthing
the13137DTthe
federal13138JJfederal
courts13139NNScourt
are13140VBPbe
authorized13141VVNauthorize
to13142TOto
ask13143VVask
,13144,,
and13145CCand
that13146WDTthat
gives13147VVZgive
the13148DTthe
government13149NNgovernment
the13150DTthe
authority13151NNauthority
to13152TOto
keep13153VVkeep
it13154PPit
secret13155JJsecret
if13156INif
it13157PPit
so13158RBso
desires13159VVZdesire
.13160SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]13161LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank13162VVthank
you13163PPyou
,13164,,
counsel13165NNcounsel
.13166SENT.
The13167DTthe
case13168NNcase
is13169VBZbe
submitted13170VVNsubmit
.13171SENT.