[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
We2PPwe
'll3MDwill
hear4VVhear
argument5NNargument
next6JJnext
in7INin
Case8NPCase
18-77399CD@card@
,10,,
Holguin-Hernandez11NPHolguin-Hernandez
versus12CCversus
United13NPUnited
States14NPSStates
.15SENT.
Ms16NNMs
.17SENT.
Turner18NPTurner
.19SENT.
[MS. TURNER]20LOC[MS. TURNER]
Thank21VVthank
you22PPyou
,23,,
Mr24NPMr
.25SENT.
Chief26NPChief
Justice27NPJustice
,28,,
and29CCand
may30MDmay
it31PPit
please32VVplease
the33DTthe
Court34NPCourt
:35::
Rule36NNrule
5137CD@card@
tells38VVZtell
parties39NNSparty
to40TOto
criminal41JJcriminal
proceedings42NNSproceeding
how43WRBhow
to44TOto
preserve45VVpreserve
claims46NNSclaim
of47INof
error48NNerror
for49INfor
appeal50NNappeal
.51SENT.
A52DTa
party53NNparty
does54VVZdo
so55RBso
by56INby
telling57VVGtell
the58DTthe
court59NNcourt
what60WDTwhat
action61NNaction
the62DTthe
party63NNparty
wants64VVZwant
the65DTthe
court66NNcourt
to67TOto
take68VVtake
when69WRBwhen
a70DTa
ruling71NNruling
is72VBZbe
made73VVNmake
or74CCor
sought75VVNseek
.76SENT.
There77EXthere
's78VBZbe
no79DTno
need80NNneed
to81TOto
tell82VVtell
the83DTthe
court84NNcourt
twice85RBtwice
.86SENT.
In87INin
every88DTevery
federal89JJfederal
court90NNcourt
of91INof
appeals92NNSappeal
except93INexcept
the94DTthe
Fifth95NPFifth
Circuit96NPCircuit
,97,,
this98DTthis
rule99NNrule
means100VVZmean
what101WPwhat
it102PPit
says103VVZsay
in104INin
the105DTthe
context106NNcontext
of107INof
sentencing108NNsentencing
proceedings109NNSproceeding
.110SENT.
Specifically111RBspecifically
,112,,
it113PPit
means114VVZmean
that115IN/thatthat
a116DTa
criminal117JJcriminal
defendant118NNdefendant
who119WPwho
argues120VVZargue
for121INfor
a122DTa
particular123JJparticular
sentence124NNsentence
in125INin
district126NNdistrict
court127NNcourt
preserves128VVZpreserve
for129INfor
appeal130NNappeal
a131DTa
challenge132NNchallenge
to133TOto
a134DTa
longer135JJRlong
sentence136NNsentence
.137SENT.
In138INin
the139DTthe
Fifth140NPFifth
Circuit141NPCircuit
,142,,
however143RBhowever
,144,,
a145DTa
criminal146JJcriminal
defendant147NNdefendant
,148,,
like149INlike
Petitioner150NNpetitioner
here151RBhere
,152,,
must153MDmust
argue154VVargue
for155INfor
a156DTa
particular157JJparticular
sentence158NNsentence
in159INin
district160NNdistrict
court161NNcourt
during162INduring
the163DTthe
sentencing164NNsentencing
hearing165NNhearing
and166CCand
must167MDmust
object168VVobject
to169TOto
any170DTany
longer171JJRlong
sentence172NNsentence
as173INas
substantively174RBsubstantively
unreasonable175JJunreasonable
after176INafter
the177DTthe
sentence178NNsentence
issues179NNSissue
.180SENT.
That181DTthat
post-sentencing182NNpost-sentencing
objection183NNobjection
requirement184NNrequirement
flouts185VVZflout
Rule186NPRule
51187CD@card@
,188,,
which189WDTwhich
expressly190RBexpressly
says191VVZsay
that192IN/thatthat
exceptions193NNSexception
are194VBPbe
not195RBnot
required196VVNrequire
.197SENT.
Nor198CCnor
is199VBZbe
there200RBthere
any201DTany
practical202JJpractical
merit203NNmerit
to204TOto
the205DTthe
Fifth206NPFifth
Circu207NPCircu
it208PPit
's209VBZbe
rule210NNrule
.211SENT.
In212INin
fact213NNfact
,214,,
there215EXthere
's216VBZbe
no217DTno
evidence218NNevidence
that219IN/thatthat
a220DTa
district221NNdistrict
court222NNcourt
has223VHZhave
ever224RBever
reconsidered225VVNreconsider
a226DTa
sentence227NNsentence
in228INin
light229NNlight
of230INof
a231DTa
post-sentencing232NNpost-sentencing
objection233NNobjection
.234SENT.
And235CCand
that236WDTthat
makes237VVZmake
sense238NNsense
.239SENT.
The240DTthe
sentencing241NNsentencing
court242NNcourt
will243MDwill
have244VHhave
just245RBjust
heard246VVNhear
and247CCand
rejected248VVNreject
the249DTthe
same250JJsame
arguments251NNSargument
in252INin
issuing253VVGissue
a254DTa
sentence255NNsentence
.256SENT.
Recognizing257VVGrecognize
that258IN/thatthat
the259DTthe
Fifth260NPFifth
Circu261NPCircu
it262PPit
's263POS's
rule264NNrule
is265VBZbe
indefensible266JJindefensible
,267,,
the268DTthe
government269NNgovernment
does270VVZdo
not271RBnot
defend272VVdefend
it273PPit
.274SENT.
Instead275RBinstead
,276,,
it277PPit
supports278VVZsupport
amicus279NNamicus
...280:...
or281CCor
Petitioner282NNpetitioner
here283RBhere
.284SENT.
An285DTan
amicus286NNamicus
tries287VVZtry
to288TOto
defend289VVdefend
the290DTthe
judgment291NNjudgment
below292INbelow
on293INon
alternative294JJalternative
grounds295NNSground
.296SENT.
According297VVGaccord
to298TOto
amicus299NNamicus
,300,,
a301DTa
party302NNparty
must303MDmust
identify304VVidentify
the305DTthe
length306NNlength
beyond307INbeyond
which308WDTwhich
a309DTa
sentence310NNsentence
is311VBZbe
substantively312RBsubstantively
unreasonable313JJunreasonable
.314SENT.
But315CCbut
substantive316JJsubstantive
reasonableness317NNreasonableness
is318VBZbe
not319RBnot
a320DTa
free-standing321JJfree-standing
requirement322NNrequirement
under323INunder
the324DTthe
Sentencing325NNsentencing
Reform326NPReform
Act327NPAct
.328SENT.
It329PPit
is330VBZbe
simply331RBsimply
a332DTa
standard333NNstandard
of334INof
appellate335JJappellate
review336NNreview
.337SENT.
And338CCand
there339EXthere
is340VBZbe
no341DTno
need342NNneed
for343INfor
parties344NNSparty
to345TOto
frame346VVframe
their347PP$their
claims348NNSclaim
in349INin
terms350NNSterm
of351INof
that352DTthat
standard353NNstandard
of354INof
appellate355JJappellate
review356NNreview
while357INwhile
they358PPthey
are359VBPbe
still360RBstill
in361INin
district362NNdistrict
court363NNcourt
,364,,
just365RBjust
as366INas
they367PPthey
need368VVPneed
not369RBnot
frame370VVframe
their371PP$their
objections372NNSobjection
to373TOto
evidentiary374JJevidentiary
rulings375NNSruling
in376INin
terms377NNSterm
of378INof
abuse379NNabuse
of380INof
discretion381NNdiscretion
or382CCor
to383TOto
factual384JJfactual
findings385NNSfinding
in386INin
terms387NNSterm
of388INof
clear389JJclear
error390NNerror
while391INwhile
they392PPthey
are393VBPbe
still394RBstill
in395INin
the396DTthe
trial397NNtrial
court398NNcourt
.399SENT.
Because400INbecause
Petitioner401NNpetitioner
here402RBhere
adequately403RBadequately
preserved404VVNpreserve
his405PP$his
challenge406NNchallenge
to407TOto
the408DTthe
length409NNlength
of410INof
his411PP$his
sentence412NNsentence
,413,,
this414DTthis
Court415NPCourt
should416MDshould
reverse417VVreverse
.418SENT.
I419PPI
'm420VBPbe
open421JJopen
to422TOto
questions423NNSquestion
.424SENT.
But425CCbut
,426,,
if427INif
you428PPyou
have429VHPhave
none430NNnone
,431,,
there432EXthere
are433VBPbe
really434RBreally
two435CDtwo
problems436NNSproblem
.437SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]438LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well439UHwell
,440,,
I441PPI
'll442MDwill
ask443VVask
...444:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]445LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
The446DTthe
defense447NNdefense
said448VVDsay
...449:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]450LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
...451:...
I452PPI
'll453MDwill
ask454VVask
...455:...
[JUSTICE GINSBURG]456LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG]
Counsel457NPCounsel
...458:...
counsel459NNcounsel
argued460VVNargue
for461INfor
the462DTthe
preferred463JJpreferred
...464:...
the465DTthe
defendant466NNdefendant
's467POS's
preferred468JJpreferred
sentence469NNsentence
.470SENT.
did471VVDdo
n't472RBn't
say473VVsay
that474IN/thatthat
anything475NNanything
other476JJother
than477INthan
that478WDTthat
would479MDwould
be480VBbe
excessive481JJexcessive
.482SENT.
[MS. TURNER]483LOC[MS. TURNER]
That484DTthat
's485VBZbe
correct486JJcorrect
,487,,
Justice488NPJustice
Ginsburg489NPGinsburg
.490SENT.
And491CCand
that492DTthat
is493VBZbe
fine494JJfine
to495TOto
put496VVput
the497DTthe
court498NNcourt
on499INon
notice500NNnotice
of501INof
his502PP$his
claim503NNclaim
that504IN/thatthat
his505PP$his
sentence506NNsentence
is507VBZbe
too508RBtoo
long509JJlong
.510SENT.
And511CCand
there512EXthere
are513VBPbe
sort514NNsort
of515INof
two516CDtwo
parts517NNSpart
to518TOto
my519PP$my
answer520NNanswer
.521SENT.
The522DTthe
first523JJfirst
is524VBZbe
that525IN/thatthat
the526DTthe
better527JJRgood
reading528NNreading
of529INof
Section530NPSection
3553531CD@card@
(532((
a533DTa
)534))
is535VBZbe
that536IN/thatthat
the537DTthe
district538NNdistrict
court539NNcourt
's540POS's
task541NNtask
is542VBZbe
to543TOto
identify544VVidentify
the545DTthe
particular546JJparticular
sentence547NNsentence
that548WDTthat
is549VBZbe
sufficient550JJsufficient
but551CCbut
not552RBnot
greater553JJRgreat
than554INthan
necessary555JJnecessary
to556TOto
serve557VVserve
the558DTthe
statute559NNstatute
's560POS's
objectives561NNSobjective
.562SENT.
And563CCand
"564``"
sufficient565JJsufficient
but566CCbut
not567RBnot
greater568JJRgreat
than569INthan
necessary570JJnecessary
"571``"
necessarily572RBnecessarily
means573VVZmean
that574IN/thatthat
there575EXthere
is576VBZbe
a577DTa
sentence578NNsentence
that579WDTthat
is580VBZbe
sufficient581JJsufficient
but582CCbut
not583RBnot
greater584JJRgreat
than585INthan
necessary586JJnecessary
.587SENT.
If588INif
one589CDone
...590:...
if591INif
10592CD@card@
months593NNSmonth
is594VBZbe
sufficient595JJsufficient
,596,,
15597CD@card@
months598NNSmonth
is599VBZbe
obviously600RBobviously
greater601JJRgreat
.602SENT.
So603RBso
,604,,
by605INby
asking606VVGask
the607DTthe
court608NNcourt
for609INfor
a610DTa
particular611JJparticular
sentence612NNsentence
,613,,
the614DTthe
party615NNparty
puts616VVZput
the617DTthe
district618NNdistrict
court619NNcourt
on620INon
notice621NNnotice
of622INof
their623PP$their
objections624NNSobjection
to625TOto
any626DTany
other627JJother
sentence628NNsentence
.629SENT.
But630CCbut
even631RBeven
if632INif
you633PPyou
do634VVPdo
n't635RBn't
agree636VVagree
with637INwith
that638DTthat
reading639NNreading
of640INof
Section641NPSection
3553642CD@card@
(643((
a644DTa
)645))
,646,,
there647EXthere
is648VBZbe
no649DTno
need650NNneed
to651TOto
inform652VVinform
the653DTthe
court654NNcourt
of655INof
all656DTall
possible657JJpossible
actions658NNSaction
it659PPit
might660MDmight
take661VVtake
.662SENT.
There663EXthere
's664VBZbe
no665DTno
...666:...
there667EXthere
's668VBZbe
no669DTno
basis670NNbasis
for671INfor
that672DTthat
requirement673NNrequirement
in674INin
Rule675NPRule
51676CD@card@
and677CCand
in678INin
other679JJother
areas680NNSarea
of681INof
the682DTthe
law683NNlaw
where684WRBwhere
there685EXthere
are686VBPbe
...687:...
or688CCor
a689DTa
district690NNdistrict
court691NNcourt
can692MDcan
take693VVtake
a694DTa
range695NNrange
of696INof
actions697NNSaction
.698SENT.
For699INfor
example700NNexample
,701,,
in702INin
the703DTthe
context704NNcontext
of705INof
Rule706NPRule
11707CD@card@
sanctions708NNSsanction
or709CCor
a710DTa
length711NNlength
of712INof
continuance713NNcontinuance
or714CCor
reasonable715JJreasonable
attorneys716NNSattorney
'717POS'
fees718NNSfee
,719,,
a720DTa
party721NNparty
simply722RBsimply
has723VHZhave
to724TOto
ask725VVask
for726INfor
the727DTthe
result728NNresult
it729PPit
wants730VVZwant
.731SENT.
It732PPit
does733VVZdo
n't734RBn't
have735VHhave
to736TOto
identify737VVidentify
all738DTall
possible739JJpossible
actions740NNSaction
the741DTthe
district742NNdistrict
court743NNcourt
might744MDmight
take745VVtake
to746TOto
preserve747VVpreserve
that748DTthat
claim749NNclaim
for750INfor
appeal751NNappeal
.752SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]753LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
But754CCbut
,755,,
I756PPI
mean757VVPmean
,758,,
let759VVlet
's760VBZbe
say761VVsay
the762DTthe
...763:...
the764DTthe
defendant765NNdefendant
says766VVZsay
I767PPI
think768VVPthink
my769PP$my
sentence770NNsentence
should771MDshould
be772VBbe
,773,,
you774PPyou
know775VVPknow
,776,,
two777CDtwo
years778NNSyear
,779,,
and780CCand
the781DTthe
district782NNdistrict
court783NNcourt
says784VVZsay
in785INin
its786PP$its
decision787NNdecision
:788::
Well789UHwell
,790,,
I791PPI
think792VVPthink
I793PPI
'm794VBPbe
going795VVGgo
to796TOto
sentence797VVsentence
you798PPyou
to799TOto
two800CDtwo
years801NNSyear
and802CCand
six803CDsix
months804NNSmonth
because805INbecause
I806PPI
think807VVPthink
you808PPyou
've809VHPhave
,810,,
you811PPyou
know812VVPknow
,813,,
misunderstood814VVDmisunderstand
this815DTthis
particular816JJparticular
provision817NNprovision
about818RBabout
,819,,
you820PPyou
know821VVPknow
,822,,
history823NNhistory
or824CCor
deterrence825NNdeterrence
or826CCor
...827:...
or828CCor
whichever829WDTwhichever
.830SENT.
And831CCand
is832VBZbe
the833DTthe
district834NNdistrict
court835NNcourt
supposed836VVNsuppose
to837TOto
appreciate838VVappreciate
,839,,
and840CCand
the841DTthe
court842NNcourt
of843INof
appeals844NNSappeal
,845,,
if846INif
the847DTthe
defendant848NNdefendant
does849VVZdo
nothing850NNnothing
else851RBelse
,852,,
that853IN/thatthat
he854PPhe
thinks855VVZthink
it856PPit
's857VBZbe
substantively858RBsubstantively
unreasonable859JJunreasonable
for860INfor
the861DTthe
district862NNdistrict
court863NNcourt
to864TOto
have865VHhave
added866VVNadd
those867DTthose
six868CDsix
months869NNSmonth
,870,,
for871INfor
a872DTa
reason873NNreason
that874IN/thatthat
the875DTthe
...876:...
may877MDmay
not878RBnot
even879RBeven
have880VHhave
been881VBNbe
addressed882VVNaddress
by883INby
the884DTthe
defendant885NNdefendant
in886INin
his887PP$his
submission888NNsubmission
?889SENT?
[MS. TURNER]890LOC[MS. TURNER]
So891INso
two892CDtwo
points893NNSpoint
,894,,
Your895PP$your
Honor896NPHonor
.897SENT.
The898DTthe
first899JJfirst
is900VBZbe
that901IN/thatthat
,902,,
you903PPyou
know904VVPknow
,905,,
the906DTthe
district907NNdistrict
court908NNcourt
does909VVZdo
n't910RBn't
really911RBreally
have912VHhave
to913TOto
appreciate914VVappreciate
that915IN/thatthat
it916PPit
is917VBZbe
substantively918RBsubstantively
unreasonable919JJunreasonable
because920INbecause
,921,,
again922RBagain
,923,,
that924WDTthat
's925VBZbe
just926RBjust
the927DTthe
appellate928JJappellate
standard929NNstandard
of930INof
review931NNreview
.932SENT.
The933DTthe
district934NNdistrict
court935NNcourt
just936RBjust
has937VHZhave
to938TOto
understand939VVunderstand
that940IN/thatthat
the941DTthe
party942NNparty
objects943NNSobject
to944TOto
the945DTthe
particular946JJparticular
sentence947NNsentence
.948SENT.
But949CCbut
also950RBalso
...951:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]952LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well953UHWell
,954,,
but955CCbut
...956:...
but957CCbut
I958PPI
do959VVPdo
n't960RBn't
know961VVknow
how962WRBhow
the963DTthe
district964NNdistrict
court965NNcourt
knows966VVZknow
that967IN/thatthat
if968INif
you969PPyou
do970VVPdo
n't971RBn't
require972VVrequire
an973DTan
objection974NNobjection
after975INafter
the976DTthe
district977NNdistrict
court978NNcourt
has979VHZhave
explained980VVNexplain
why981WRBwhy
he982PPhe
's983VBZbe
adding984VVGadd
the985DTthe
six986CDsix
months987NNSmonth
.988SENT.
As989RBas
far990RBfar
as991INas
he992PPhe
knows993VVZknow
,994,,
well995RBwell
,996,,
maybe997RBmaybe
that998DTthat
's999VBZbe
okay1000JJokay
with1001INwith
the1002DTthe
defendant1003NNdefendant
;1004:;
he1005PPhe
wanted1006VVDwant
two1007CDtwo
years1008NNSyear
,1009,,
but1010CCbut
he1011PPhe
can1012MDcan
't1013RB't
really1014RBreally
say1015VVsay
that1016IN/thatthat
it1017PPit
's1018VBZbe
unreasonable1019JJunreasonable
to1020TOto
get1021VVget
two1022CDtwo
years1023NNSyear
and1024CCand
six1025CDsix
months1026NNSmonth
.1027SENT.
Particularly1028RBparticularly
since1029INsince
I1030PPI
pointed1031VVDpoint
out1032RPout
to1033TOto
him1034PPhim
precisely1035RBprecisely
why1036WRBwhy
I1037PPI
'm1038VBPbe
adding1039VVGadd
those1040DTthose
six1041CDsix
months1042NNSmonth
.1043SENT.
[MS. TURNER]1044LOC[MS. TURNER]
So1045RBso
,1046,,
again1047RBagain
,1048,,
we1049PPwe
think1050VVPthink
the1051DTthe
better1052JJRgood
view1053NNview
of1054INof
Section1055NPSection
35531056CD@card@
(1057((
a1058DTa
)1059))
is1060VBZbe
that1061IN/thatthat
it1062PPit
really1063RBreally
instructs1064VVZinstruct
the1065DTthe
district1066NNdistrict
court1067NNcourt
to1068TOto
identify1069VVidentify
a1070DTa
particular1071JJparticular
sentence1072NNsentence
,1073,,
and1074CCand
so1075RBso
,1076,,
by1077INby
identifying1078VVGidentify
a1079DTa
particular1080JJparticular
sentence1081NNsentence
,1082,,
the1083DTthe
defendant1084NNdefendant
necessarily1085RBnecessarily
communicates1086VVZcommunicate
that1087IN/thatthat
other1088JJother
sentences1089NNSsentence
...1090:...
that1091IN/thatthat
he1092PPhe
does1093VVZdo
n't1094RBn't
agree1095VVagree
with1096INwith
other1097JJother
sentences1098NNSsentence
.1099SENT.
And1100CCand
while1101INwhile
it1102PPit
's1103VBZbe
true1104JJtrue
that1105IN/thatthat
a1106DTa
defendant1107NNdefendant
might1108MDmight
not1109RBnot
have1110VHhave
identified1111VVNidentify
every1112DTevery
factor1113NNfactor
in1114INin
Section1115NPSection
35531116CD@card@
(1117((
a1118DTa
)1119))
in1120INin
requesting1121VVGrequest
a1122DTa
particular1123JJparticular
sentence1124NNsentence
...1125:...
you1126PPyou
know1127VVPknow
,1128,,
there1129EXthere
are1130VBPbe
only1131RBonly
five1132CDfive
,1133,,
I1134PPI
think1135VVPthink
...1136:...
and1137CCand
district1138NNdistrict
courts1139NNScourt
and1140CCand
defense1141NNdefense
attorneys1142NNSattorney
are1143VBPbe
familiar1144JJfamiliar
with1145INwith
those1146DTthose
factors1147NNSfactor
and1148CCand
there1149EXthere
's1150VBZbe
no1151DTno
need1152NNneed
to1153TOto
specifically1154RBspecifically
run1155VVrun
through1156INthrough
them1157PPthem
.1158SENT.
21159CD2
Similarly1160RBsimilarly
,1161,,
in1162INin
other1163JJother
contexts1164NNScontext
,1165,,
other1166JJother
areas1167NNSarea
of1168INof
the1169DTthe
law1170NNlaw
,1171,,
there1172EXthere
's1173VBZbe
no1174DTno
need1175NNneed
to1176TOto
...1177:...
for1178INfor
...1179:...
to1180TOto
...1181:...
example1182NNexample
,1183,,
when1184WRBwhen
someone1185NNsomeone
...1186:...
when1187WRBwhen
a1188DTa
district1189NNdistrict
court1190NNcourt
makes1191VVZmake
a1192DTa
evidentiary1193JJevidentiary
ruling1194NNruling
that1195IN/thatthat
a1196DTa
party1197NNparty
disagrees1198VVZdisagree
with1199INwith
,1200,,
the1201DTthe
party1202NNparty
does1203VVZdo
n't1204RBn't
have1205VHhave
to1206TOto
say1207VVsay
this1208DTthis
is1209VBZbe
an1210DTan
abuse1211NNabuse
of1212INof
discretion1213NNdiscretion
,1214,,
even1215RBeven
if1216INif
the1217DTthe
district1218NNdistrict
court1219NNcourt
identifies1220VVZidentify
reasons1221NNSreason
...1222:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1223LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Yeah1224NPYeah
,1225,,
but1226CCbut
,1227,,
I1228PPI
mean1229VVPmean
,1230,,
it1231PPit
could1232MDcould
end1233VVend
up1234RPup
to1235TOto
particularly1236RBparticularly
odd1237JJodd
results1238NNSresult
.1239SENT.
I1240PPI
mean1241VVPmean
,1242,,
without1243INwithout
a1244DTa
particular1245JJparticular
objection1246NNobjection
,1247,,
the1248DTthe
district1249NNdistrict
judge1250NNjudge
might1251MDmight
,1252,,
you1253PPyou
know1254VVPknow
,1255,,
be1256VBbe
sitting1257VVGsit
there1258RBthere
in1259INin
the1260DTthe
court1261NNcourt
of1262INof
appeals1263NNSappeal
and1264CCand
the1265DTthe
brief1266NNbrief
that1267WDTthat
is1268VBZbe
filed1269VVNfile
is1270VBZbe
,1271,,
you1272PPyou
know1273VVPknow
,1274,,
401275CD@card@
pages1276NNSpage
objecting1277VVGobject
to1278TOto
,1279,,
you1280PPyou
know1281VVPknow
,1282,,
a1283DTa
particular1284JJparticular
provision1285NNprovision
.1286SENT.
And1287CCand
the1288DTthe
district1289NNdistrict
court1290NNcourt
says1291VVZsay
:1292::
Well1293UHwell
,1294,,
that1295WDTthat
's1296VBZbe
not1297RBnot
what1298WPwhat
I1299PPI
was1300VBDbe
looking1301VVGlook
at1302INat
at1303INat
all1304DTall
.1305SENT.
I1306PPI
was1307VBDbe
looking1308VVGlook
at1309INat
something1310NNsomething
else1311RBelse
.1312SENT.
[MS. TURNER]1313LOC[MS. TURNER]
In1314INin
this1315DTthis
...1316:...
in1317INin
this1318DTthis
hypothetical1319JJhypothetical
,1320,,
the1321DTthe
party1322NNparty
is1323VBZbe
raising1324VVGraise
different1325JJdifferent
arguments1326NNSargument
on1327INon
appeal1328NNappeal
,1329,,
is1330VBZbe
that1331DTthat
...1332:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1333LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well1334UHWell
,1335,,
the1336DTthe
whole1337JJwhole
point1338NNpoint
,1339,,
I1340PPI
...1341:...
I1342PPI
guess1343VVPguess
,1344,,
of1345INof
a1346DTa
post-decision1347NNpost-decision
objection1348NNobjection
...1349:...
[MS. TURNER]1350LOC[MS. TURNER]
Yes1351NPYes
.1352SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1353LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
...1354:...
is1355VBZbe
that1356IN/thatthat
it1357PPit
puts1358VVZput
people1359NNSpeople
on1360INon
notice1361NNnotice
as1362INas
to1363TOto
what1364WPwhat
the1365DTthe
defendant1366NNdefendant
is1367VBZbe
objecting1368VVGobject
to1369TOto
.1370SENT.
And1371CCand
that1372WDTthat
can1373MDcan
shape1374VVshape
,1375,,
you1376PPyou
know1377VVPknow
,1378,,
whether1379INwhether
it1380PPit
's1381POS's
subsequent1382JJsubsequent
proceedings1383NNSproceeding
in1384INin
the1385DTthe
district1386NNdistrict
court1387NNcourt
or1388CCor
appellate1389JJappellate
review1390NNreview
,1391,,
when1392WRBwhen
,1393,,
instead1394RBinstead
,1395,,
if1396INif
you1397PPyou
just1398RBjust
say1399VVPsay
,1400,,
well1401RBwell
,1402,,
so1403RBso
long1404RBlong
as1405INas
it1406PPit
's1407VBZbe
more1408JJRmore
than1409INthan
the1410DTthe
defendant1411NNdefendant
asked1412VVDask
for1413INfor
,1414,,
in1415INin
a1416DTa
regime1417NNregime
where1418WRBwhere
there1419EXthere
are1420VBPbe
a1421DTa
lot1422NNlot
of1423INof
factors1424NNSfactor
...1425:...
I1426PPI
'd1427MDwould
count1428VVcount
more1429JJRmore
than1430INthan
five1431CDfive
despite1432INdespite
the1433DTthe
subsections1434NNSsubsection
...1435:...
it1436PPit
's1437VBZbe
particularly1438RBparticularly
helpful1439JJhelpful
to1440TOto
the1441DTthe
process1442NNprocess
that1443IN/thatthat
people1444NNSpeople
know1445VVPknow
what1446WPwhat
the1447DTthe
concern1448NNconcern
really1449RBreally
is1450VBZbe
going1451VVGgo
forward1452RBforward
.1453SENT.
[MS. TURNER]1454LOC[MS. TURNER]
But1455CCbut
,1456,,
again1457RBagain
,1458,,
that1459WDTthat
is1460VBZbe
just1461RBjust
the1462DTthe
appellate1463JJappellate
standard1464NNstandard
of1465INof
review1466NNreview
.1467SENT.
And1468CCand
Rule1469NPRule
511470CD@card@
is1471VBZbe
explicit1472JJexplicit
in1473INin
saying1474VVGsay
that1475IN/thatthat
post-ruling1476NNpost-ruling
objections1477NNSobjection
are1478VBPbe
not1479RBnot
required1480VVNrequire
if1481INif
you1482PPyou
have1483VHPhave
already1484RBalready
informed1485VVNinform
the1486DTthe
court1487NNcourt
of1488INof
the1489DTthe
action1490NNaction
that1491IN/thatthat
you1492PPyou
wish1493VVPwish
it1494PPit
to1495TOto
take1496VVtake
.1497SENT.
And1498CCand
there1499EXthere
's1500VBZbe
no1501DTno
reason1502NNreason
to1503TOto
...1504:...
to1505TOto
alter1506VValter
that1507DTthat
approach1508NNapproach
in1509INin
the1510DTthe
sentencing1511NNsentencing
context1512NNcontext
.1513SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]1514LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Do1515VVPdo
you1516PPyou
think1517VVPthink
that1518IN/thatthat
under1519INunder
the1520DTthe
so-called1521JJso-called
parsimony1522NNparsimony
principle1523NNprinciple
,1524,,
there1525EXthere
is1526VBZbe
one1527CDone
precise1528JJprecise
sentence1529NNsentence
in1530INin
every1531DTevery
case1532NNcase
that1533WDTthat
serves1534VVZserve
all1535PDTall
the1536DTthe
interests1537NNSinterest
of1538INof
sentencing1539NNsentencing
but1540CCbut
does1541VVZdo
n't1542RBn't
do1543VVdo
so1544RBso
to1545TOto
an1546DTan
excessive1547JJexcessive
extent1548NNextent
?1549SENT?
[MS. TURNER]1550LOC[MS. TURNER]
That1551DTthat
is1552VBZbe
the1553DTthe
district1554NNdistrict
court1555NNcourt
's1556POS's
task1557NNtask
,1558,,
is1559VBZbe
to1560TOto
find1561VVfind
the1562DTthe
sentence1563NNsentence
the1564DTthe
district1565NNdistrict
court1566NNcourt
determines1567VVZdetermine
is1568VBZbe
sufficient1569JJsufficient
but1570CCbut
not1571RBnot
...1572:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]1573LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
And1574CCand
there1575EXthere
's1576VBZbe
just1577RBjust
one1578CDone
.1579SENT.
So1580RBso
it1581PPit
's1582VBZbe
...1583:...
let1584VVlet
's1585VBZbe
say1586VVsay
it1587PPit
's1588POS's
111589CD@card@
months1590NNSmonth
,1591,,
that1592WDTthat
is1593VBZbe
the1594DTthe
...1595:...
that1596WDTthat
is1597VBZbe
the1598DTthe
sentence1599NNsentence
called1600VVNcall
for1601INfor
by1602INby
the1603DTthe
Sentencing1604NNsentencing
Reform1605NPReform
Act1606NPAct
,1607,,
not1608RBnot
101609CD@card@
,1610,,
not1611RBnot
121612CD@card@
.1613SENT.
Eleven1614NNeleven
.1615SENT.
[MS. TURNER]1616LOC[MS. TURNER]
So1617INso
it1618PPit
's1619VBZbe
not1620RBnot
that1621IN/thatthat
there1622EXthere
is1623VBZbe
some1624DTsome
Platonically1625RBPlatonically
correct1626JJcorrect
sentence1627NNsentence
.1628SENT.
But1629CCbut
the1630DTthe
district1631NNdistrict
court1632NNcourt
's1633POS's
task1634NNtask
is1635VBZbe
to1636TOto
determine1637VVdetermine
the1638DTthe
sentence1639NNsentence
that1640IN/thatthat
,1641,,
in1642INin
its1643PP$its
view1644NNview
,1645,,
is1646VBZbe
sufficient1647JJsufficient
but1648CCbut
not1649RBnot
greater1650JJRgreat
than1651INthan
necessary1652JJnecessary
.1653SENT.
And1654CCand
that1655DTthat
's1656VBZbe
,1657,,
you1658PPyou
know1659VVPknow
,1660,,
inherent1661JJinherent
in1662INin
sort1663NNsort
of1664INof
this1665DTthis
parsimony1666NNparsimony
principle1667NNprinciple
.1668SENT.
I1669PPI
mean1670VVPmean
,1671,,
that1672WDTthat
's1673VBZbe
what1674WPwhat
that1675DTthat
language1676NNlanguage
means1677VVZmean
.1678SENT.
If1679INif
101680CD@card@
months1681NNSmonth
is1682VBZbe
sufficient1683JJsufficient
but1684CCbut
not1685RBnot
greater1686JJRgreat
than1687INthan
necessary1688JJnecessary
,1689,,
101690CD@card@
months1691NNSmonth
and1692CCand
one1693CDone
day1694NNday
is1695VBZbe
greater1696JJRgreat
than1697INthan
necessary1698JJnecessary
.1699SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]1700LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
Well1701UHWell
,1702,,
if1703INif
that1704DTthat
...1705:...
if1706INif
it1707PPit
is1708VBZbe
not1709RBnot
the1710DTthe
case1711NNcase
that1712IN/thatthat
there1713RBthere
...1714:...
the1715DTthe
parsimony1716NNparsimony
principle1717NNprinciple
identifies1718VVZidentify
one1719CDone
particular1720JJparticular
,1721,,
precise1722JJprecise
sentence1723NNsentence
that1724WDTthat
is1725VBZbe
the1726DTthe
correct1727JJcorrect
sentence1728NNsentence
,1729,,
then1730RBthen
saying1731VVGsay
...1732:...
then1733RBthen
for1734INfor
defense1735NNdefense
counsel1736NNcounsel
to1737TOto
say1738VVsay
111739CD@card@
...1740:...
I1741PPI
...1742:...
I1743PPI
...1744:...
I1745PPI
urge1746VVPurge
you1747PPyou
to1748TOto
sentence1749VVsentence
my1750PP$my
client1751NNclient
to1752TOto
no1753RBno
more1754JJRmore
than1755INthan
111756CD@card@
months1757NNSmonth
,1758,,
that1759WDTthat
's1760VBZbe
different1761JJdifferent
from1762INfrom
saying1763VVGsay
that1764IN/thatthat
a1765DTa
...1766:...
a1767DTa
sentence1768NNsentence
of1769INof
121770CD@card@
months1771NNSmonth
would1772MDwould
be1773VBbe
outside1774INoutside
the1775DTthe
range1776NNrange
of1777INof
reasonableness1778NNreasonableness
...1779:...
[MS. TURNER]1780LOC[MS. TURNER]
Again1781NPAgain
,1782,,
Your1783PP$your
Honor1784NPHonor
,1785,,
it1786PPit
...1787:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]1788LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
...1789:...
which1790WDTwhich
is1791VBZbe
what1792WPwhat
would1793MDwould
have1794VHhave
to1795TOto
be1796VBbe
shown1797VVNshow
on1798INon
appeal1799NNappeal
.1800SENT.
[MS. TURNER]1801LOC[MS. TURNER]
...1802:...
it1803PPit
...1804:...
you1805PPyou
know1806VVPknow
,1807,,
it1808PPit
is1809VBZbe
sort1810NNsort
of1811INof
a1812DTa
different1813JJdifferent
argument1814NNargument
on1815INon
appeal1816NNappeal
,1817,,
but1818CCbut
it1819PPit
is1820VBZbe
no1821RBno
different1822JJdifferent
than1823INthan
,1824,,
again1825RBagain
,1826,,
if1827INif
you1828PPyou
were1829VBDbe
on1830INon
appeal1831NNappeal
and1832CCand
you1833PPyou
had1834VHDhave
to1835TOto
argue1836VVargue
that1837IN/thatthat
the1838DTthe
district1839NNdistrict
court1840NNcourt
's1841POS's
ruling1842NNruling
was1843VBDbe
an1844DTan
abuse1845NNabuse
of1846INof
discretion1847NNdiscretion
,1848,,
you1849PPyou
...1850:...
you1851PPyou
do1852VVPdo
n't1853RBn't
have1854VHhave
to1855TOto
make1856VVmake
that1857DTthat
abuse1858NNabuse
of1859INof
discretion1860NNdiscretion
argument1861NNargument
in1862INin
district1863NNdistrict
court1864NNcourt
,1865,,
even1866RBeven
though1867INthough
that1868DTthat
is1869VBZbe
how1870WRBhow
you1871PPyou
would1872MDwould
have1873VHhave
to1874TOto
frame1875VVframe
your1876PP$your
argument1877NNargument
on1878INon
appeal1879NNappeal
.1880SENT.
It1881PPit
's1882VBZbe
exactly1883RBexactly
the1884DTthe
same1885JJsame
here1886RBhere
.1887SENT.
And1888CCand
we1889PPwe
're1890VBPbe
just1891RBjust
asking1892VVGask
for1893INfor
those1894DTthose
same1895JJsame
rules1896NNSrule
to1897TOto
apply1898VVapply
in1899INin
this1900DTthis
context1901NNcontext
.1902SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]1903LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
What1904WPWhat
if1905INif
...1906:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1907LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Ms1908NNMs
.1909SENT.
Kendall1910NPKendall
...1911:...
I1912PPI
'm1913VBPbe
sorry1914JJsorry
.1915SENT.
[JUSTICE ALITO]1916LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
What1917WPWhat
if1918INif
defense1919NNdefense
...1920:...
just1921RBjust
along1922INalong
the1923DTthe
same1924JJsame
lines1925NNSline
very1926RBvery
quickly1927RBquickly
.1928SENT.
What1929WPWhat
if1930INif
defense1931NNdefense
counsel1932NNcounsel
says1933VVZsay
,1934,,
look1935VVlook
,1936,,
I1937PPI
understand1938VVPunderstand
that1939IN/thatthat
the1940DTthe
...1941:...
the1942DTthe
guidelines1943NNSguideline
range1944NNrange
is1945VBZbe
to1946TOto
121947CD@card@
months1948NNSmonth
and1949CCand
I1950PPI
...1951:...
and1952CCand
I1953PPI
know1954VVPknow
that1955IN/thatthat
that1956DTthat
's1957VBZbe
presumptively1958RBpresumptively
reasonable1959JJreasonable
and1960CCand
I1961PPI
'm1962VBPbe
not1963RBnot
going1964VVGgo
to1965TOto
argue1966VVargue
with1967INwith
that1968DTthat
,1969,,
but1970CCbut
I1971PPI
urge1972VVPurge
you1973PPyou
to1974TOto
sentence1975VVsentence
my1976PP$my
client1977NNclient
to1978TOto
no1979RBno
more1980JJRmore
than1981INthan
101982CD@card@
.1983SENT.
And1984CCand
the1985DTthe
judge1986NNjudge
says1987VVZsay
,1988,,
well1989RBwell
,1990,,
I1991PPI
'm1992VBPbe
sorry1993JJsorry
,1994,,
I1995PPI
'm1996VBPbe
going1997VVGgo
to1998TOto
choose1999VVchoose
112000CD@card@
.2001SENT.
Can2002MDcan
the2003DTthe
defense2004NNdefense
counsel2005NNcounsel
then2006RBthen
argue2007VVPargue
on2008INon
appeal2009NNappeal
112010CD@card@
was2011VBDbe
unreasonable2012JJunreasonable
?2013SENT?
[MS. TURNER]2014LOC[MS. TURNER]
If2015INif
the2016DTthe
defense2017NNdefense
counsel2018NNcounsel
has2019VHZhave
said2020VVNsay
...2021:...
has2022VHZhave
said2023VVNsay
that2024IN/thatthat
102025CD@card@
to2026TOto
122027CD@card@
would2028MDwould
be2029VBbe
acceptable2030JJacceptable
or2031CCor
if2032INif
he2033PPhe
's2034VBZbe
only2035RBonly
asked2036VVNask
for2037INfor
102038CD@card@
?2039SENT?
[JUSTICE ALITO]2040LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
He2041PPhe
says2042VVZsay
,2043,,
I2044PPI
understand2045VVPunderstand
that2046DTthat
's2047VBZbe
the2048DTthe
range2049NNrange
and2050CCand
that2051DTthat
's2052VBZbe
a2053DTa
reasonable2054JJreasonable
range2055NNrange
,2056,,
but2057CCbut
I2058PPI
think2059VVPthink
the2060DTthe
appropriate2061JJappropriate
sentence2062NNsentence
here2063RBhere
is2064VBZbe
102065CD@card@
.2066SENT.
[MS. TURNER]2067LOC[MS. TURNER]
So2068RBso
,2069,,
if2070INif
...2071:...
if2072INif
the2073DTthe
defense2074NNdefense
counsel2075NNcounsel
simply2076RBsimply
identified2077VVDidentify
the2078DTthe
guidelines2079NNSguideline
range2080NNrange
and2081CCand
then2082RBthen
asked2083VVNask
for2084INfor
a2085DTa
particular2086JJparticular
sentence2087NNsentence
,2088,,
then2089RBthen
,2090,,
yes2091UHyes
,2092,,
I2093PPI
think2094VVPthink
that2095IN/thatthat
defense2096NNdefense
counsel2097NNcounsel
could2098MDcould
argue2099VVargue
on2100INon
appeal2101NNappeal
that2102IN/thatthat
112103CD@card@
months2104NNSmonth
was2105VBDbe
substantively2106RBsubstantively
unreasonable2107JJunreasonable
.2108SENT.
However2109RBhowever
,2110,,
if2111INif
a2112DTa
district2113NNdistrict
court2114NNcourt
...2115:...
or2116CCor
if2117INif
a2118DTa
defense2119NNdefense
counsel2120NNcounsel
said2121VVDsay
something2122NNsomething
like2123INlike
,2124,,
anything2125NNanything
in2126INin
the2127DTthe
102128CD@card@
to2129TOto
122130CD@card@
months2131NNSmonth
range2132NNrange
is2133VBZbe
fine2134JJfine
with2135INwith
us2136PPus
and2137CCand
we2138PPwe
think2139VVPthink
that2140WDTthat
's2141VBZbe
...2142:...
you2143PPyou
can2144MDcan
do2145VVdo
that2146IN/thatthat
,2147,,
in2148INin
that2149DTthat
case2150NNcase
,2151,,
arguably2152RBarguably
,2153,,
he2154PPhe
has2155VHZhave
not2156RBnot
preserved2157VVNpreserve
an2158DTan
objection2159NNobjection
to2160TOto
an2161DTan
11-month2162JJ11-month
sentence2163NNsentence
,2164,,
but2165CCbut
it2166PPit
...2167:...
you2168PPyou
know2169VVPknow
,2170,,
it2171PPit
would2172MDwould
depend2173VVdepend
on2174INon
the2175DTthe
context2176NNcontext
of2177INof
what2178WPwhat
exactly2179RBexactly
defense2180NNdefense
counsel2181NNcounsel
had2182VHDhave
said2183VVNsay
.2184SENT.
And2185CCand
there2186EXthere
's2187VBZbe
no2188DTno
reason2189NNreason
to2190TOto
craft2191VVcraft
unique2192JJunique
rules2193NNSrule
in2194INin
this2195DTthis
context2196NNcontext
.2197SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2198LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Ms2199NNMs
.2200SENT.
Kendall2201NPKendall
,2202,,
the2203DTthe
amici2204NNamici
seems2205VVZseem
in2206INin
my2207PP$my
mind2208NNmind
to2209TOto
be2210VBbe
arguing2211VVGargue
not2212RBnot
differently2213RBdifferently
than2214INthan
you2215PPyou
are2216VBPbe
,2217,,
that2218IN/thatthat
you2219PPyou
do2220VVPdo
n't2221RBn't
need2222VVneed
to2223TOto
make2224VVmake
necessarily2225RBnecessarily
an2226DTan
objection2227NNobjection
after2228INafter
the2229DTthe
fact2230NNfact
in2231INin
all2232DTall
circumstances2233NNScircumstance
.2234SENT.
He2235PPhe
seems2236VVZseem
to2237TOto
be2238VBbe
arguing2239VVGargue
that2240IN/thatthat
the2241DTthe
circumstances2242NNScircumstance
,2243,,
though2244RBthough
,2245,,
in2246INin
which2247WDTwhich
you2248PPyou
do2249VVPdo
n't2250RBn't
have2251VHhave
to2252TOto
renew2253VVrenew
afterward2254RBafterward
are2255VBPbe
those2256DTthose
where2257WRBwhere
you2258PPyou
lay2259VVDlie
forth2260RBforth
the2261DTthe
reasons2262NNSreason
for2263INfor
why2264WRBwhy
you2265PPyou
want2266VVPwant
something2267NNsomething
,2268,,
and2269CCand
so2270RBso
that2271IN/thatthat
you2272PPyou
merely2273RBmerely
saying2274VVGsay
,2275,,
I2276PPI
think2277VVPthink
102278CD@card@
months2279NNSmonth
is2280VBZbe
enough2281JJenough
is2282VBZbe
not2283RBnot
enough2284RBenough
,2285,,
that2286IN/thatthat
that2287WDTthat
does2288VVZdo
n't2289RBn't
put2290VVput
the2291DTthe
district2292NNdistrict
court2293NNcourt
on2294INon
notice2295NNnotice
of2296INof
the2297DTthe
reasons2298NNSreason
you2299PPyou
think2300VVPthink
102301CD@card@
months2302NNSmonth
are2303VBPbe
enough2304JJenough
.2305SENT.
And2306CCand
so2307RBso
that2308IN/thatthat
he2309PPhe
's2310VBZbe
basically2311RBbasically
,2312,,
I2313PPI
think2314VVPthink
,2315,,
he2316PPhe
'll2317MDwill
speak2318VVspeak
for2319INfor
himself2320PPhimself
,2321,,
obviously2322RBobviously
,2323,,
but2324CCbut
assuming2325VVGassume
his2326PP$his
argument2327NNargument
in2328INin
my2329PP$my
question2330NNquestion
,2331,,
that2332WDTthat
you2333PPyou
need2334VVPneed
to2335TOto
put2336VVput
the2337DTthe
district2338NNdistrict
court2339NNcourt
on2340INon
some2341DTsome
sort2342NNsort
of2343INof
notice2344NNnotice
what2345WPwhat
the2346DTthe
basis2347NNbasis
is2348VBZbe
for2349INfor
you2350PPyou
believing2351VVGbelieve
that2352IN/thatthat
102353CD@card@
or2354CCor
or2355CCor
112356CD@card@
months2357NNSmonth
is2358VBZbe
the2359DTthe
right2360JJright
number2361NNnumber
,2362,,
and2363CCand
that2364IN/thatthat
if2365INif
you2366PPyou
do2367VVPdo
n't2368RBn't
do2369VVdo
that2370IN/thatthat
,2371,,
then2372RBthen
you2373PPyou
do2374VVPdo
need2375NNneed
to2376TOto
...2377:...
you2378PPyou
have2379VHPhave
n't2380RBn't
preserved2381VVNpreserve
your2382PP$your
objection2383NNobjection
adequately2384RBadequately
.2385SENT.
How2386WRBHow
do2387VVPdo
you2388PPyou
address2389VVaddress
that2390DTthat
argument2391NNargument
?2392SENT?
[MS. TURNER]2393LOC[MS. TURNER]
So2394RBso
,2395,,
as2396INas
a2397DTa
...2398:...
just2399RBjust
as2400INas
a2401DTa
first2402JJfirst
point2403NNpoint
and2404CCand
a2405DTa
practical2406JJpractical
matter2407NNmatter
,2408,,
it2409PPit
is2410VBZbe
vanishingly2411RBvanishingly
rare2412JJrare
that2413IN/thatthat
a2414DTa
defense2415NNdefense
attorney2416NNattorney
will2417MDwill
have2418VHhave
not2419RBnot
filed2420VVNfile
objections2421NNSobjection
to2422TOto
the2423DTthe
PSR2424NNPSR
and2425CCand
will2426MDwill
simply2427RBsimply
stand2428VVstand
up2429RPup
and2430CCand
say2431VVsay
,2432,,
Section2433NPSection
35532434CD@card@
(2435((
a2436DTa
)2437))
requires2438VVZrequire
a2439DTa
shorter2440JJRshort
sentence2441NNsentence
and2442CCand
sit2443VVsit
down2444RPdown
.2445SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2446LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I2447PPI
...2448:...
I2449PPI
agree2450VVPagree
with2451INwith
you2452PPyou
.2453SENT.
It2454PPit
...2455:...
it2456PPit
never2457RBnever
happened2458VVDhappen
in2459INin
my2460PP$my
experience2461NNexperience
,2462,,
but2463CCbut
it2464PPit
does2465VVZdo
n't2466RBn't
mean2467VVmean
it2468PPit
can2469MDcan
't2470RB't
.2471SENT.
And2472CCand
so2473RBso
the2474DTthe
question2475NNquestion
is2476VBZbe
for2477INfor
a2478DTa
reviewing2479VVGreview
court2480NNcourt
,2481,,
when2482WRBwhen
it2483PPit
gets2484VVZget
that2485DTthat
situation2486NNsituation
,2487,,
what2488WPwhat
is2489VBZbe
it2490PPit
looking2491VVGlook
at2492INat
...2493:...
[MS. TURNER]2494LOC[MS. TURNER]
So2495RBso
...2496:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2497LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
...2498:...
to2499TOto
make2500VVmake
a2501DTa
judgment2502NNjudgment
as2503INas
to2504TOto
whether2505INwhether
or2506CCor
not2507RBnot
the2508DTthe
objection2509NNobjection
was2510VBDbe
adequately2511RBadequately
preserved2512VVNpreserve
when2513WRBwhen
it2514PPit
was2515VBDbe
n't2516RBn't
restated2517VVNrestate
at2518INat
the2519DTthe
end2520NNend
?2521SENT?
I2522PPI
'm2523VBPbe
sorry2524JJsorry
.2525SENT.
[MS. TURNER]2526LOC[MS. TURNER]
Thank2527VVthank
you2528PPyou
.2529SENT.
The2530DTthe
Court2531NPCourt
's2532VBZbe
simply2533RBsimply
applying2534VVGapply
the2535DTthe
same2536JJsame
fair2537JJfair
notice2538NNnotice
standard2539NNstandard
that2540IN/thatthat
it2541PPit
applies2542VVZapply
in2543INin
every2544DTevery
other2545JJother
context2546NNcontext
to2547TOto
determine2548VVdetermine
whether2549INwhether
a2550DTa
factual2551JJfactual
...2552:...
an2553DTan
argument2554NNargument
is2555VBZbe
preserved2556VVNpreserve
.2557SENT.
It2558PPit
's2559VBZbe
the2560DTthe
test2561NNtest
that2562IN/thatthat
this2563DTthis
Court2564NPCourt
laid2565VVDlay
out2566RPout
in2567INin
Beech2568NPBeech
Aircraft2569NPAircraft
.2570SENT.
And2571CCand
anything2572RBanything
more2573RBRmore
specific2574JJspecific
,2575,,
requiring2576VVGrequire
very2577RBvery
specific2578JJspecific
facts2579NNSfact
and2580CCand
circumstances2581NNScircumstance
,2582,,
as2583INas
amicus2584NNamicus
tends2585VVZtend
to2586TOto
suggest2587VVsuggest
,2588,,
is2589VBZbe
unwise2590JJunwise
because2591INbecause
it2592PPit
would2593MDwould
create2594VVcreate
new2595JJnew
problems2596NNSproblem
for2597INfor
this2598DTthis
Court2599NPCourt
to2600TOto
resolve2601VVresolve
,2602,,
such2603JJsuch
as2604INas
if2605INif
someone2606NNsomeone
argued2607VVNargue
in2608INin
district2609NNdistrict
court2610NNcourt
that2611IN/thatthat
his2612PP$his
client2613NNclient
was2614VBDbe
sick2615JJsick
and2616CCand
deserved2617VVDdeserve
a2618DTa
shorter2619JJRshort
sentence2620NNsentence
and2621CCand
then2622RBthen
argued2623VVDargue
on2624INon
appeal2625NNappeal
that2626IN/thatthat
he2627PPhe
was2628VBDbe
going2629VVGgo
to2630TOto
die2631VVdie
and2632CCand
deserved2633VVDdeserve
a2634DTa
shorter2635JJRshort
sentence2636NNsentence
,2637,,
the2638DTthe
Court2639NPCourt
would2640MDwould
have2641VHhave
to2642TOto
determine2643VVdetermine
whether2644INwhether
that2645WDTthat
was2646VBDbe
the2647DTthe
same2648JJsame
fact2649NNfact
and2650CCand
circumstance2651NNcircumstance
.2652SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2653LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank2654VVthank
you2655PPyou
,2656,,
counsel2657NNcounsel
.2658SENT.
Ms2659NNMs
.2660SENT.
Ratner2661NPRatner
.2662SENT.
[MS. RATNER]2663LOC[MS. RATNER]
Mr2664NPMr
.2665SENT.
Chief2666NPChief
Justice2667NPJustice
,2668,,
and2669CCand
may2670MDmay
it2671PPit
please2672VVplease
the2673DTthe
Court2674NPCourt
:2675::
I2676PPI
want2677VVPwant
to2678TOto
be2679VBbe
very2680RBvery
clear2681JJclear
about2682INabout
what2683WPwhat
is2684VBZbe
and2685CCand
is2686VBZbe
not2687RBnot
preserved2688VVNpreserve
when2689WRBwhen
a2690DTa
defendant2691NNdefendant
argues2692VVZargue
for2693INfor
a2694DTa
lower2695JJRlow
sentence2696NNsentence
than2697INthan
he2698PPhe
receives2699VVZreceive
.2700SENT.
There2701EXthere
are2702VBPbe
three2703CDthree
key2704JJkey
points2705NNSpoint
.2706SENT.
First2707RBfirst
,2708,,
a2709DTa
defendant2710NNdefendant
who2711WPwho
argues2712VVZargue
for2713INfor
a2714DTa
lower2715JJRlow
sentence2716NNsentence
does2717VVZdo
preserve2718VVpreserve
the2719DTthe
claim2720NNclaim
that2721IN/thatthat
the2722DTthe
district2723NNdistrict
court2724NNcourt
unreasonably2725RBunreasonably
declined2726VVDdecline
to2727TOto
grant2728VVgrant
the2729DTthe
leniency2730NNleniency
requested2731VVDrequest
.2732SENT.
Second2733RBsecond
,2734,,
a2735DTa
defendant2736NNdefendant
does2737VVZdo
not2738RBnot
preserve2739VVpreserve
any2740DTany
procedural2741JJprocedural
challenges2742NNSchallenge
or2743CCor
any2744DTany
challenges2745NNSchallenge
,2746,,
however2747RBhowever
labeled2748VVNlabel
,2749,,
that2750WDTthat
go2751VVPgo
to2752TOto
something2753NNsomething
other2754JJother
than2755INthan
the2756DTthe
length2757NNlength
of2758INof
the2759DTthe
sentence2760NNsentence
.2761SENT.
And2762CCand
,2763,,
third2764JJthird
,2765,,
a2766DTa
defendant2767NNdefendant
who2768WPwho
argues2769VVZargue
for2770INfor
leniency2771NNleniency
on2772INon
one2773CDone
ground2774NNground
in2775INin
the2776DTthe
district2777NNdistrict
court2778NNcourt
does2779VVZdo
not2780RBnot
preserve2781VVpreserve
a2782DTa
claim2783NNclaim
for2784INfor
leniency2785NNleniency
on2786INon
a2787DTa
different2788JJdifferent
ground2789NNground
.2790SENT.
Those2791DTthose
three2792CDthree
points2793NNSpoint
all2794RBall
come2795VVPcome
from2796INfrom
the2797DTthe
same2798JJsame
overarching2799JJoverarching
principle2800NNprinciple
that2801IN/thatthat
parties2802NNSparty
need2803VVPneed
to2804TOto
give2805VVgive
the2806DTthe
district2807NNdistrict
court2808NNcourt
an2809DTan
opportunity2810NNopportunity
to2811TOto
consider2812VVconsider
and2813CCand
resolve2814VVresolve
their2815PP$their
claims2816NNSclaim
.2817SENT.
But2818CCbut
,2819,,
under2820INunder
Rule2821NPRule
512822CD@card@
,2823,,
they2824PPthey
need2825VVPneed
to2826TOto
give2827VVgive
the2828DTthe
district2829NNdistrict
court2830NNcourt
one2831CDone
opportunity2832NNopportunity
,2833,,
not2834RBnot
two2835CDtwo
.2836SENT.
And2837CCand
that2838DTthat
's2839VBZbe
fundamentally2840RBfundamentally
where2841WRBwhere
the2842DTthe
court2843NNcourt
below2844INbelow
erred2845VVNerr
.2846SENT.
I2847PPI
think2848VVPthink
that2849IN/thatthat
Petitioner2850NNpetitioner
has2851VHZhave
highlighted2852VVNhighlight
some2853DTsome
of2854INof
the2855DTthe
problems2856NNSproblem
.2857SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2858LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
On2859INon
your2860PP$your
...2861:...
on2862INon
your2863PP$your
first2864JJfirst
two2865CDtwo
points2866NNSpoint
,2867,,
in2868INin
my2869PP$my
experience2870NNexperience
,2871,,
a2872DTa
substantive2873JJsubstantive
unreasonableness2874NNunreasonableness
claim2875NNclaim
is2876VBZbe
almost2877RBalmost
always2878RBalways
coupled2879VVNcouple
with2880INwith
a2881DTa
procedural2882JJprocedural
failure2883NNfailure
to2884TOto
explain2885VVexplain
claim2886NNclaim
.2887SENT.
And2888CCand
you2889PPyou
're2890VBPbe
saying2891VVGsay
you2892PPyou
do2893VVPdo
n't2894RBn't
need2895VVneed
to2896TOto
object2897VVobject
for2898INfor
the2899DTthe
first2900JJfirst
,2901,,
but2902CCbut
you2903PPyou
do2904VVPdo
need2905VVneed
to2906TOto
object2907VVobject
for2908INfor
the2909DTthe
second2910JJsecond
,2911,,
when2912WRBwhen
they2913PPthey
're2914VBPbe
almost2915RBalmost
always2916RBalways
coupled2917VVNcouple
.2918SENT.
[MS. RATNER]2919LOC[MS. RATNER]
So2920RBso
let2921VVlet
me2922PPme
make2923VVmake
this2924DTthis
very2925RBvery
clear2926JJclear
.2927SENT.
We2928PPwe
think2929VVPthink
Rule2930NPRule
512931CD@card@
applies2932VVZapply
equally2933RBequally
to2934TOto
both2935DTboth
of2936INof
those2937DTthose
.2938SENT.
We2939PPwe
think2940VVPthink
that2941IN/thatthat
,2942,,
as2943INas
a2944DTa
practical2945JJpractical
matter2946NNmatter
,2947,,
the2948DTthe
first2949JJfirst
half2950NNhalf
of2951INof
Rule2952NPRule
512953CD@card@
,2954,,
the2955DTthe
affirmative2956JJaffirmative
request2957NNrequest
,2958,,
is2959VBZbe
often2960RBoften
going2961VVGgo
to2962TOto
be2963VBbe
the2964DTthe
way2965NNway
that2966IN/thatthat
substantive2967JJsubstantive
reasonableness2968NNreasonableness
claims2969NNSclaim
are2970VBPbe
preserved2971VVNpreserve
,2972,,
whereas2973INwhereas
,2974,,
as2975INas
a2976DTa
practical2977JJpractical
matter2978NNmatter
,2979,,
the2980DTthe
second2981JJsecond
half2982NNhalf
of2983INof
Rule2984NPRule
512985CD@card@
is2986VBZbe
often2987RBoften
going2988VVGgo
to2989TOto
be2990VBbe
the2991DTthe
way2992NNway
the2993DTthe
procedural2994JJprocedural
reasonableness2995NNreasonableness
claims2996NNSclaim
are2997VBPbe
preserved2998VVNpreserve
.2999SENT.
And3000CCand
that3001DTthat
's3002VBZbe
just3003RBjust
because3004INbecause
of3005INof
the3006DTthe
way3007NNway
sentencing3008NNsentencing
hearings3009NNShearing
occur3010VVPoccur
.3011SENT.
So3012INso
the3013DTthe
whole3014JJwhole
point3015NNpoint
of3016INof
a3017DTa
sentence3018NNsentence
hearing3019NNhearing
...3020:...
sentencing3021NNsentencing
hearing3022NNhearing
is3023VBZbe
for3024INfor
parties3025NNSparty
to3026TOto
advocate3027VVadvocate
to3028TOto
the3029DTthe
Court3030NPCourt
what3031WPwhat
they3032PPthey
think3033VVPthink
the3034DTthe
appropriate3035JJappropriate
sentence3036NNsentence
is3037VBZbe
.3038SENT.
They3039PPthey
put3040VVDput
the3041DTthe
district3042NNdistrict
court3043NNcourt
then3044RBthen
on3045INon
notice3046NNnotice
of3047INof
those3048DTthose
arguments3049NNSargument
.3050SENT.
By3051INby
contrast3052NNcontrast
,3053,,
a3054DTa
party3055NNparty
is3056VBZbe
n't3057RBn't
going3058VVGgo
to3059TOto
have3060VHhave
the3061DTthe
opportunity3062NNopportunity
to3063TOto
tell3064VVtell
the3065DTthe
district3066NNdistrict
court3067NNcourt
in3068INin
advance3069NNadvance
,3070,,
we3071PPwe
think3072VVPthink
you3073PPyou
've3074VHPhave
given3075VVNgive
an3076DTan
insufficient3077JJinsufficient
explanation3078NNexplanation
until3079INuntil
they3080PPthey
've3081VHPhave
actually3082RBactually
heard3083VVNhear
the3084DTthe
explanation3085NNexplanation
.3086SENT.
And3087CCand
so3088RBso
it3089PPit
's3090VBZbe
just3091RBjust
because3092INbecause
of3093INof
that3094DTthat
practical3095JJpractical
reason3096NNreason
that3097IN/thatthat
those3098DTthose
are3099VBPbe
...3100:...
are3101VBPbe
going3102VVGgo
to3103TOto
tend3104VVtend
to3105TOto
be3106VBbe
after-the-fact3107JJafter-the-fact
objections3108NNSobjection
instead3109RBinstead
of3110INof
in-advance3111NNin-advance
requests3112NNSrequest
.3113SENT.
And3114CCand
that3115WDTthat
we3116PPwe
...3117:...
we3118PPwe
really3119RBreally
do3120VVPdo
think3121VVthink
is3122VBZbe
the3123DTthe
key3124JJkey
point3125NNpoint
here3126RBhere
,3127,,
that3128IN/thatthat
we3129PPwe
're3130VBPbe
not3131RBnot
asking3132VVGask
for3133INfor
any3134DTany
sort3135NNsort
of3136INof
exception3137NNexception
for3138INfor
Rule3139NPRule
513140CD@card@
.3141SENT.
It3142PPit
applies3143VVZapply
the3144DTthe
same3145JJsame
in3146INin
the3147DTthe
sentencing3148NNsentencing
context3149NNcontext
as3150INas
outside3151INoutside
the3152DTthe
sentencing3153NNsentencing
context3154NNcontext
.3155SENT.
It3156PPit
applies3157VVZapply
to3158TOto
substantive3159JJsubstantive
reasonableness3160NNreasonableness
claims3161NNSclaim
and3162CCand
procedural3163JJprocedural
reasonableness3164NNreasonableness
claims3165NNSclaim
.3166SENT.
We3167PPwe
're3168VBPbe
just3169RBjust
asking3170VVGask
,3171,,
is3172VBZbe
this3173DTthis
particular3174JJparticular
claim3175NNclaim
one3176PPone
that3177IN/thatthat
the3178DTthe
district3179NNdistrict
court3180NNcourt
has3181VHZhave
already3182RBalready
had3183VHNhave
an3184DTan
opportunity3185NNopportunity
to3186TOto
consider3187VVconsider
?3188SENT?
And3189CCand
...3190:...
[JUSTICE ALITO]3191LOC[JUSTICE ALITO]
On3192INon
your3193PP$your
...3194:...
on3195INon
your3196PP$your
third3197JJthird
point3198NNpoint
about3199INabout
providing3200VVGprovide
the3201DTthe
ground3202NNground
for3203INfor
the3204DTthe
...3205:...
the3206DTthe
...3207:...
the3208DTthe
claim3209NNclaim
on3210INon
...3211:...
on3212INon
appeal3213NNappeal
,3214,,
by3215INby
that3216DTthat
,3217,,
do3218VVdo
you3219PPyou
mean3220VVmean
just3221RBjust
a3222DTa
citation3223NNcitation
to3224TOto
the3225DTthe
...3226:...
a3227DTa
general3228JJgeneral
category3229NNcategory
of3230INof
...3231:...
of3232INof
sentencing3233NNsentencing
consideration3234NNconsideration
,3235,,
or3236CCor
do3237VVPdo
you3238PPyou
mean3239VVmean
a3240DTa
specific3241JJspecific
argument3242NNargument
or3243CCor
pointing3244VVGpoint
out3245RPout
specific3246JJspecific
facts3247NNSfact
?3248SENT?
What3249WPWhat
do3250VVPdo
you3251PPyou
mean3252VVPmean
?3253SENT?
[MS. RATNER]3254LOC[MS. RATNER]
We3255PPwe
mean3256VVPmean
that3257IN/thatthat
the3258DTthe
circumstances3259NNScircumstance
that3260IN/thatthat
the3261DTthe
defendant3262NNdefendant
feels3263NNSfeel
are3264VBPbe
important3265JJimportant
under3266INunder
Section3267NPSection
35533268CD@card@
(3269((
a3270DTa
)3271))
in3272INin
order3273NNorder
to3274TOto
entitle3275VVentitle
him3276PPhim
to3277TOto
the3278DTthe
lower3279JJRlow
sentence3280NNsentence
he3281PPhe
's3282VBZbe
asking3283VVGask
for3284INfor
.3285SENT.
And3286CCand
so3287RBso
,3288,,
to3289TOto
...3290:...
to3291TOto
give3292VVgive
a3293DTa
simple3294JJsimple
hypothetical3295JJhypothetical
,3296,,
a3297DTa
defendant3298NNdefendant
who3299WPwho
is3300VBZbe
in3301INin
the3302DTthe
district3303NNdistrict
court3304NNcourt
and3305CCand
says3306VVZsay
:3307::
I3308PPI
deserve3309VVPdeserve
a3310DTa
below-guidelines3311JJbelow-guidelines
sentence3312NNsentence
because3313INbecause
of3314INof
my3315PP$my
family3316NNfamily
background3317NNbackground
and3318CCand
mitigating3319JJmitigating
circumstances3320NNScircumstance
in3321INin
my3322PP$my
family3323NNfamily
history3324NNhistory
,3325,,
has3326VHZhave
not3327RBnot
preserved3328VVNpreserve
a3329DTa
claim3330NNclaim
for3331INfor
appeal3332NNappeal
that3333IN/thatthat
he3334PPhe
deserves3335VVZdeserve
a3336DTa
below-guidelines3337JJbelow-guidelines
sentence3338NNsentence
because3339INbecause
of3340INof
his3341PP$his
reduced3342VVNreduce
role3343NNrole
in3344INin
the3345DTthe
offense3346NNoffense
.3347SENT.
That3348DTthat
has3349VHZhave
n't3350RBn't
fairly3351RBfairly
put3352VVput
the3353DTthe
district3354NNdistrict
court3355NNcourt
on3356INon
notice3357NNnotice
of3358INof
the3359DTthe
substance3360NNsubstance
of3361INof
his3362PP$his
claim3363NNclaim
,3364,,
and3365CCand
so3366RBso
that3367WDTthat
can3368MDcan
't3369RB't
be3370VBbe
thought3371VVNthink
of3372INof
as3373RBas
having3374VHGhave
sufficiently3375RBsufficiently
preserved3376VVNpreserve
the3377DTthe
...3378:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]3379LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
But3380CCbut
how3381JJhow
...3382:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]3383LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
I3384PPI
take3385VVPtake
it3386PPit
that3387IN/thatthat
you3388PPyou
're3389VBPbe
not3390RBnot
suggesting3391VVGsuggest
that3392IN/thatthat
one3393CDone
of3394INof
those3395DTthose
grounds3396NNSground
has3397VHZhave
to3398TOto
be3399VBbe
specifically3400RBspecifically
linked3401VVNlink
to3402TOto
a3403DTa
statutory3404JJstatutory
factor3405NNfactor
,3406,,
is3407VBZbe
that3408IN/thatthat
correct3409JJcorrect
?3410SENT?
[MS. RATNER]3411LOC[MS. RATNER]
We3412PPwe
are3413VBPbe
n't3414RBn't
...3415:...
again3416RBagain
,3417,,
the3418DTthe
overarching3419JJoverarching
question3420NNquestion
is3421VBZbe
going3422VVGgo
to3423TOto
be3424VBbe
an3425DTan
issue3426NNissue
of3427INof
fair3428JJfair
notice3429NNnotice
.3430SENT.
So3431RBso
,3432,,
as3433INas
a3434DTa
general3435JJgeneral
matter3436NNmatter
,3437,,
no3438UHno
,3439,,
it3440PPit
's3441VBZbe
not3442RBnot
necessarily3443RBnecessarily
the3444DTthe
case3445NNcase
that3446IN/thatthat
those3447DTthose
types3448NNStype
of3449INof
factual3450JJfactual
circumstances3451NNScircumstance
have3452VHPhave
to3453TOto
be3454VBbe
particularly3455RBparticularly
tied3456VVNtie
up3457RPup
to3458TOto
deterrence3459NNdeterrence
or3460CCor
the3461DTthe
seriousness3462NNseriousness
of3463INof
the3464DTthe
offense3465NNoffense
or3466CCor
what3467WPwhat
have3468VHPhave
you3469PPyou
.3470SENT.
I3471PPI
...3472:...
I3473PPI
could3474MDcould
imagine3475VVimagine
a3476DTa
case3477NNcase
where3478WRBwhere
a3479DTa
defendant3480NNdefendant
's3481POS's
argument3482NNargument
is3483VBZbe
so3484RBso
intimately3485RBintimately
tied3486VVNtie
to3487TOto
one3488CDone
of3489INof
those3490DTthose
factors3491NNSfactor
that3492IN/thatthat
it3493PPit
has3494VHZhave
n't3495RBn't
really3496RBreally
given3497VVNgive
the3498DTthe
district3499NNdistrict
court3500NNcourt
notice3501NNnotice
,3502,,
fair3503JJfair
notice3504NNnotice
,3505,,
which3506WDTwhich
,3507,,
again3508RBagain
,3509,,
we3510PPwe
think3511VVPthink
is3512VBZbe
the3513DTthe
touchstone3514NNtouchstone
,3515,,
but3516CCbut
,3517,,
in3518INin
the3519DTthe
ordinary3520JJordinary
case3521NNcase
,3522,,
no3523UHno
,3524,,
we3525PPwe
do3526VVPdo
n't3527RBn't
think3528VVthink
that3529IN/thatthat
that3530DTthat
's3531VBZbe
going3532VVGgo
to3533TOto
have3534VHhave
to3535TOto
be3536VBbe
tied3537VVNtie
up3538RBup
that3539IN/thatthat
neatly3540RBneatly
.3541SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3542LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
How3543WRBHow
do3544VVPdo
we3545PPwe
write3546VVwrite
...3547:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]3548LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
In3549INin
your3550PP$your
...3551:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3552LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
I3553PPI
'm3554VBPbe
sorry3555JJsorry
.3556SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]3557LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Go3558NPGo
ahead3559RBahead
.3560SENT.
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3561LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
How3562WRBHow
do3563VVPdo
we3564PPwe
write3565VVwrite
this3566DTthis
opinion3567NNopinion
?3568SENT?
Do3569VVPdo
we3570PPwe
need3571VVPneed
to3572TOto
get3573VVget
into3574INinto
all3575DTall
of3576INof
this3577DTthis
?3578SENT?
Are3579VBPbe
you3580PPyou
asking3581VVGask
us3582PPus
to3583TOto
give3584VVgive
a3585DTa
sort3586NNsort
of3587INof
bible3588NNbible
,3589,,
this3590DTthis
preserves3591NNSpreserve
enough3592RBenough
,3593,,
that3594WDTthat
does3595VVZdo
n't3596RBn't
preserve3597VVpreserve
enough3598RBenough
?3599SENT?
Is3600VBZbe
it3601PPit
adequate3602JJadequate
for3603INfor
us3604PPus
just3605RBjust
to3606TOto
say3607VVsay
it3608PPit
's3609VBZbe
too3610RBtoo
absolute3611JJabsolute
a3612DTa
rule3613NNrule
to3614TOto
require3615VVrequire
a3616DTa
specific3617JJspecific
objection3618NNobjection
under3619INunder
all3620DTall
circumstances3621NNScircumstance
so3622RBso
long3623RBlong
as3624INas
a3625DTa
defendant3626NNdefendant
has3627VHZhave
given3628VVNgive
us3629PPus
a3630DTa
fair3631NNfair
...3632:...
given3633VVNgive
the3634DTthe
district3635NNdistrict
court3636NNcourt
notice3637NNnotice
of3638INof
its3639PP$its
grounds3640NNSground
for3641INfor
a3642DTa
particular3643JJparticular
different3644JJdifferent
sentence3645NNsentence
than3646INthan
given3647VVNgive
,3648,,
that3649IN/thatthat
that3650DTthat
's3651VBZbe
enough3652JJenough
?3653SENT?
[MS. RATNER]3654LOC[MS. RATNER]
So3655RBso
,3656,,
Justice3657NPJustice
Sotomayor3658NPSotomayor
,3659,,
I3660PPI
think3661VVPthink
that3662IN/thatthat
you3663PPyou
could3664MDcould
write3665VVwrite
an3666DTan
opinion3667NNopinion
that3668WDTthat
says3669VVZsay
the3670DTthe
Fifth3671NPFifth
Circu3672NPCircu
it3673PPit
's3674POS's
rule3675NNrule
is3676VBZbe
wrong3677JJwrong
;3678:;
it3679PPit
's3680VBZbe
too3681RBtoo
absolute3682JJabsolute
a3683DTa
rule3684NNrule
in3685INin
requiring3686VVGrequire
a3687DTa
post3688NNpost
hoc3689FWhoc
objection3690NNobjection
.3691SENT.
But3692CCbut
I3693PPI
do3694VVPdo
think3695VVthink
there3696EXthere
would3697MDwould
be3698VBbe
significant3699JJsignificant
value3700NNvalue
in3701INin
the3702DTthe
Court3703NPCourt
offering3704VVGoffer
some3705DTsome
clarity3706NNclarity
,3707,,
not3708RBnot
just3709RBjust
...3710:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3711LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
For3712INfor
you3713PPyou
,3714,,
obviously3715RBobviously
,3716,,
but3717CCbut
...3718:...
[MS. RATNER]3719LOC[MS. RATNER]
Well3720UHWell
,3721,,
I3722PPI
...3723:...
Justice3724NPJustice
Sotomayor3725NPSotomayor
,3726,,
the3727DTthe
reason3728NNreason
that3729IN/thatthat
I3730PPI
'm3731VBPbe
saying3732VVGsay
that3733WDTthat
is3734VBZbe
that3735IN/thatthat
I3736PPI
think3737VVPthink
the3738DTthe
courts3739NNScourt
of3740INof
appeals3741NNSappeal
have3742VHPhave
largely3743RBlargely
got3744VVNget
these3745DTthese
questions3746NNSquestion
correct3747VVPcorrect
.3748SENT.
There3749EXthere
's3750VBZbe
really3751RBreally
just3752RBjust
one3753CDone
outlier3754NNoutlier
in3755INin
one3756CDone
direction3757NNdirection
or3758CCor
another3759DTanother
.3760SENT.
And3761CCand
I3762PPI
do3763VVPdo
think3764VVthink
there3765EXthere
could3766MDcould
be3767VBbe
some3768DTsome
potential3769NNpotential
in3770INin
this3771DTthis
Court3772NPCourt
's3773POS's
decision3774NNdecision
here3775RBhere
to3776TOto
introduce3777VVintroduce
confusion3778NNconfusion
if3779INif
it3780PPit
's3781VBZbe
not3782RBnot
clear3783JJclear
about3784RBabout
just3785RBjust
what3786WPwhat
is3787VBZbe
...3788:...
what3789WPwhat
is3790VBZbe
and3791CCand
is3792VBZbe
not3793RBnot
preserved3794VVNpreserve
when3795WRBwhen
a3796DTa
defendant3797NNdefendant
makes3798VVZmake
these3799DTthese
sorts3800NNSsort
of3801INof
arguments3802NNSargument
.3803SENT.
As3804RBas
for3805INfor
what3806WPwhat
an3807DTan
opinion3808NNopinion
would3809MDwould
look3810VVlook
like3811INlike
,3812,,
we3813PPwe
would3814MDwould
...3815:...
we3816PPwe
think3817VVPthink
that3818IN/thatthat
Just3819RBjust
...3820:...
Judge3821NPJudge
Sutton3822NPSutton
's3823POS's
opinion3824NNopinion
for3825INfor
the3826DTthe
en3827NNen
banc3828NNbanc
Sixth3829NPSixth
Circuit3830NPCircuit
in3831INin
United3832NPUnited
States3833NPSStates
against3834INagainst
Vonner3835NPVonner
navigates3836VVZnavigate
these3837DTthese
various3838JJvarious
issues3839NNSissue
.3840SENT.
It3841PPit
describes3842VVZdescribe
how3843WRBhow
Rule3844NPRule
513845NP@card@
applies3846VVZapply
in3847INin
these3848DTthese
contexts3849NNScontext
and3850CCand
,3851,,
again3852RBagain
,3853,,
does3854VVZdo
n't3855RBn't
suggest3856VVsuggest
that3857IN/thatthat
there3858EXthere
are3859VBPbe
any3860DTany
exceptions3861NNSexception
to3862TOto
Rule3863NPRule
513864CD@card@
but3865CCbut
explains3866VVZexplain
how3867WRBhow
,3868,,
as3869INas
a3870DTa
practical3871JJpractical
matter3872NNmatter
,3873,,
that3874DTthat
analysis3875NNanalysis
is3876VBZbe
going3877VVGgo
to3878TOto
look3879VVlook
a3880DTa
little3881RBlittle
different3882JJdifferent
in3883INin
some3884DTsome
contexts3885NNScontext
than3886INthan
others3887NNSother
.3888SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]3889LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Back3890RBback
to3891TOto
your3892PP$your
hypothetical3893JJhypothetical
with3894INwith
Justice3895NPJustice
Alito3896NPAlito
,3897,,
I3898PPI
'm3899VBPbe
not3900RBnot
sure3901JJsure
how3902WRBhow
appellate3903JJappellate
courts3904NNScourt
are3905VBPbe
supposed3906VVNsuppose
to3907TOto
do3908VVdo
this3909DTthis
because3910INbecause
it3911PPit
's3912VBZbe
not3913RBnot
that3914IN/thatthat
it3915PPit
's3916VBZbe
not3917RBnot
preserved3918VVNpreserve
;3919:;
it3920PPit
's3921VBZbe
that3922IN/thatthat
it3923PPit
's3924VBZbe
reviewed3925VVNreview
under3926INunder
plain3927JJplain
error3928NNerror
.3929SENT.
So3930RBso
you3931PPyou
would3932MDwould
have3933VHhave
,3934,,
say3935VVsay
,3936,,
family3937NNfamily
history3938NNhistory
reviewed3939VVNreview
under3940INunder
substantive3941JJsubstantive
unreasonableness3942NNunreasonableness
and3943CCand
reduced3944VVNreduce
role3945NNrole
in3946INin
the3947DTthe
offense3948NNoffense
reviewed3949VVNreview
under3950INunder
plain3951JJplain
error3952NNerror
for3953INfor
one3954CDone
inquiry3955NNinquiry
of3956INof
overall3957JJoverall
substantive3958JJsubstantive
unreasonableness3959NNunreasonableness
,3960,,
when3961WRBwhen
substantive3962JJsubstantive
unreasonableness3963NNunreasonableness
...3964:...
let3965VVlet
me3966PPme
just3967RBjust
add3968VVPadd
this3969DTthis
...3970:...
itself3971PPitself
,3972,,
when3973WRBwhen
you3974PPyou
actually3975RBactually
apply3976VVapply
it3977PPit
in3978INin
practice3979NNpractice
,3980,,
is3981VBZbe
a3982DTa
lot3983NNlot
like3984INlike
plain3985JJplain
error3986NNerror
.3987SENT.
Obvious3988JJobvious
it3989PPit
's3990VBZbe
so3991RBso
deferential3992JJdeferential
in3993INin
most3994JJSmost
courts3995NNScourt
of3996INof
appeals3997NNSappeal
,3998,,
the3999DTthe
kind4000NNkind
of4001INof
obvious4002JJobvious
errors4003NNSerror
when4004WRBwhen
you4005PPyou
say4006VVPsay
substantive4007JJsubstantive
...4008:...
substantively4009RBsubstantively
unreasonable4010JJunreasonable
.4011SENT.
So4012RBso
I4013PPI
'm4014VBPbe
not4015RBnot
sure4016JJsure
how4017WRBhow
a4018DTa
judge4019NNjudge
can4020MDcan
keep4021VVkeep
all4022PDTall
that4023DTthat
straight4024JJstraight
.4025SENT.
[MS. RATNER]4026LOC[MS. RATNER]
Well4027UHwell
,4028,,
I4029PPI
think4030VVPthink
,4031,,
in4032INin
practice4033NNpractice
,4034,,
it4035PPit
has4036VHZhave
n't4037RBn't
been4038VBNbe
that4039RBthat
complicated4040VVNcomplicate
,4041,,
Justice4042NPJustice
Kavanaugh4043NPKavanaugh
,4044,,
and4045CCand
courts4046NNScourt
...4047:...
again4048RBagain
,4049,,
this4050DTthis
is4051VBZbe
the4052DTthe
rule4053NNrule
that4054IN/thatthat
we4055PPwe
think4056VVPthink
is4057VBZbe
in4058INin
play4059NNplay
in4060INin
...4061:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4062LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well4063UHwell
,4064,,
I4065PPI
think4066VVPthink
that4067IN/thatthat
supports4068NNSsupport
...4069:...
[MS. RATNER]4070LOC[MS. RATNER]
...4071:...
most4072JJSmost
of4073INof
the4074DTthe
courts4075NNScourt
of4076INof
appeals4077NNSappeal
.4078SENT.
And4079CCand
...4080:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4081LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Keep4082VVkeep
going4083VVGgo
.4084SENT.
[MS. RATNER]4085LOC[MS. RATNER]
The4086DTthe
way4087NNway
that4088IN/thatthat
that4089WDTthat
shakes4090VVZshake
out4091RBout
is4092VBZbe
usually4093RBusually
one4094CDone
of4095INof
two4096CDtwo
ways4097NNSway
.4098SENT.
So4099RBso
,4100,,
first4101RBfirst
,4102,,
a4103DTa
court4104NNcourt
of4105INof
appeals4106NNSappeal
might4107MDmight
say4108VVsay
,4109,,
looking4110VVGlook
at4111INat
all4112DTall
of4113INof
those4114DTthose
circumstances4115NNScircumstance
that4116IN/thatthat
you4117PPyou
preserved4118VVDpreserve
,4119,,
we4120PPwe
do4121VVPdo
n't4122RBn't
see4123VVsee
this4124DTthis
as4125INas
a4126DTa
substantively4127RBsubstantively
unreasonable4128JJunreasonable
sentence4129NNsentence
or4130CCor
we4131PPwe
do4132VVPdo
n't4133RBn't
see4134VVsee
this4135DTthis
as4136INas
an4137DTan
abuse4138NNabuse
of4139INof
discretion4140NNdiscretion
.4141SENT.
And4142CCand
then4143RBthen
,4144,,
if4145INif
we4146PPwe
look4147VVPlook
to4148TOto
the4149DTthe
circumstances4150NNScircumstance
you4151PPyou
are4152VBPbe
raising4153VVGraise
for4154INfor
the4155DTthe
first4156JJfirst
time4157NNtime
,4158,,
nothing4159NNnothing
in4160INin
there4161EXthere
suggests4162VVZsuggest
that4163IN/thatthat
our4164PP$our
analysis4165NNanalysis
of4166INof
substantive4167JJsubstantive
reasonableness4168NNreasonableness
is4169VBZbe
plain4170JJplain
error4171NNerror
.4172SENT.
That4173DTthat
's4174VBZbe
sort4175NNsort
of4176INof
option4177NNoption
14178CD1
they4179PPthey
do4180VVPdo
.4181SENT.
Option4182NNoption
24183CD2
,4184,,
and4185CCand
...4186:...
and4187CCand
sort4188NNsort
of4189INof
going4190VVGgo
to4191TOto
your4192PP$your
second4193JJsecond
point4194NNpoint
that4195IN/thatthat
this4196DTthis
is4197VBZbe
already4198RBalready
a4199DTa
deferential4200JJdeferential
standard4201NNstandard
,4202,,
we4203PPwe
see4204VVPsee
fairly4205RBfairly
often4206RBoften
courts4207NNScourt
say4208VVPsay
,4209,,
well4210RBwell
,4211,,
even4212RBeven
assuming4213VVGassume
that4214IN/thatthat
all4215DTall
of4216INof
this4217DTthis
had4218VHDhave
been4219VBNbe
preserved4220VVNpreserve
,4221,,
it4222PPit
would4223MDwould
n't4224RBn't
be4225VBbe
a4226DTa
substantively4227RBsubstantively
unreasonable4228JJunreasonable
sentence4229NNsentence
,4230,,
or4231CCor
it4232PPit
would4233MDwould
n't4234RBn't
be4235VBbe
an4236DTan
abuse4237NNabuse
of4238INof
discretion4239NNdiscretion
.4240SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4241LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Would4242MDwould
...4243:...
can4244MDcan
you4245PPyou
imagine4246VVimagine
a4247DTa
sentence4248NNsentence
that4249WDTthat
's4250VBZbe
substantively4251RBsubstantively
unreasonable4252JJunreasonable
but4253CCbut
not4254RBnot
plain4255JJplain
error4256NNerror
?4257SENT?
[MS. RATNER]4258LOC[MS. RATNER]
Yes4259NPYes
,4260,,
we4261PPwe
do4262VVPdo
think4263VVthink
that4264IN/thatthat
there4265EXthere
is4266VBZbe
a4267DTa
small4268JJsmall
sliver4269NNsliver
of4270INof
daylight4271NNdaylight
between4272INbetween
these4273DTthese
standards4274NNSstandard
.4275SENT.
I4276PPI
...4277:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4278LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
It4279PPit
's4280VBZbe
extremely4281RBextremely
small4282JJsmall
?4283SENT?
[MS. RATNER]4284LOC[MS. RATNER]
It4285PPit
is4286VBZbe
very4287RBvery
small4288JJsmall
.4289SENT.
We4290PPwe
think4291VVPthink
that4292WDTthat
's4293VBZbe
exactly4294RBexactly
why4295WRBwhy
,4296,,
if4297INif
this4298DTthis
case4299NNcase
is4300VBZbe
vacated4301VVNvacate
and4302CCand
remanded4303VVNremand
,4304,,
we4305PPwe
would4306MDwould
advocate4307VVadvocate
for4308INfor
the4309DTthe
same4310JJsame
outcome4311NNoutcome
under4312INunder
a4313DTa
substantive4314JJsubstantive
reasonable4315JJreasonable
review4316NNreview
.4317SENT.
24318CD2
You4319PPyou
might4320MDmight
think4321VVthink
of4322INof
it4323PPit
as4324RBas
analogous4325JJanalogous
to4326TOto
double4327VVdouble
deference4328NNdeference
under4329INunder
AEDPA4330NPAEDPA
,4331,,
that4332WDTthat
...4333:...
there4334EXthere
's4335VBZbe
already4336RBalready
a4337DTa
deferential4338JJdeferential
standard4339NNstandard
of4340INof
review4341NNreview
,4342,,
but4343CCbut
if4344INif
you4345PPyou
were4346VBDbe
to4347TOto
add4348VVadd
plain4349JJplain
error4350NNerror
on4351INon
top4352NNtop
,4353,,
you4354PPyou
'd4355MDwould
get4356VVget
sort4357NNsort
of4358INof
an4359DTan
extra4360JJextra
little4361JJlittle
bit4362NNbit
of4363INof
deference4364NNdeference
.4365SENT.
Again4366RBagain
,4367,,
it4368PPit
probably4369RBprobably
would4370MDwould
n't4371RBn't
be4372VBbe
dispositive4373JJdispositive
in4374INin
most4375JJSmost
cases4376NNScase
,4377,,
and4378CCand
that4379DTthat
's4380VBZbe
why4381WRBwhy
it4382PPit
does4383VVZdo
n't4384RBn't
create4385VVcreate
that4386IN/thatthat
many4387JJmany
difficulties4388NNSdifficulty
for4389INfor
courts4390NNScourt
in4391INin
practice4392NNpractice
.4393SENT.
But4394CCbut
,4395,,
at4396INat
the4397DTthe
end4398NNend
of4399INof
the4400DTthe
day4401NNday
,4402,,
the4403DTthe
key4404JJkey
problem4405NNproblem
with4406INwith
the4407DTthe
Fifth4408NPFifth
Circu4409NPCircu
it4410PPit
's4411VBZbe
rule4412NNrule
here4413RBhere
is4414VBZbe
that4415IN/thatthat
it4416PPit
's4417VBZbe
requiring4418VVGrequire
parties4419NNSparty
to4420TOto
say4421VVsay
,4422,,
in4423INin
the4424DTthe
district4425NNdistrict
court4426NNcourt
,4427,,
the4428DTthe
applicable4429JJapplicable
appellate4430JJappellate
standard4431NNstandard
of4432INof
review4433NNreview
.4434SENT.
And4435CCand
that4436DTthat
's4437VBZbe
just4438RBjust
not4439RBnot
something4440NNsomething
that4441IN/thatthat
litigants4442NNSlitigant
are4443VBPbe
required4444VVNrequire
to4445TOto
do4446VVdo
in4447INin
any4448DTany
other4449JJother
context4450NNcontext
.4451SENT.
The4452DTthe
district4453NNdistrict
court4454NNcourt
's4455POS's
job4456NNjob
,4457,,
under4458INunder
Rita4459NPRita
and4460CCand
Kimbrough4461NPKimbrough
and4462CCand
Gall4463NPGall
,4464,,
is4465VBZbe
to4466TOto
decide4467VVdecide
the4468DTthe
sentence4469NNsentence
that4470WDTthat
is4471VBZbe
appropriate4472JJappropriate
under4473INunder
the4474DTthe
Section4475NPSection
35534476CD@card@
(4477((
a4478DTa
)4479))
factors4480NNSfactor
.4481SENT.
And4482CCand
reasonableness4483NNreasonableness
is4484VBZbe
just4485RBjust
not4486RBnot
an4487DTan
inquiry4488NNinquiry
that4489WDTthat
comes4490VVZcome
into4491INinto
play4492NNplay
until4493INuntil
the4494DTthe
case4495NNcase
is4496VBZbe
appealed4497VVNappeal
,4498,,
and4499CCand
that4500DTthat
's4501VBZbe
the4502DTthe
inquiry4503NNinquiry
that4504IN/thatthat
the4505DTthe
court4506NNcourt
of4507INof
appeals4508NNSappeal
will4509MDwill
apply4510VVapply
in4511INin
the4512DTthe
first4513JJfirst
instance4514NNinstance
.4515SENT.
If4516INif
there4517EXthere
are4518VBPbe
no4519RBno
further4520JJRfurther
questions4521NNSquestion
,4522,,
we4523PPwe
would4524MDwould
ask4525VVask
the4526DTthe
Court4527NPCourt
to4528TOto
vacate4529VVvacate
and4530CCand
remand4531VVremand
.4532SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4533LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank4534VVthank
you4535PPyou
,4536,,
counsel4537NNcounsel
.4538SENT.
Mr4539NPMr
.4540SENT.
Allen4541NPAllen
.4542SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]4543LOC[MR. ALLEN]
Thank4544VVthank
you4545PPyou
,4546,,
Mr4547NPMr
.4548SENT.
Chief4549NPChief
Justice4550NPJustice
,4551,,
and4552CCand
may4553MDmay
it4554PPit
please4555VVplease
the4556DTthe
Court4557NPCourt
:4558::
The4559DTthe
question4560NNquestion
in4561INin
this4562DTthis
case4563NNcase
is4564VBZbe
what4565WPwhat
a4566DTa
party4567NNparty
must4568MDmust
do4569VVdo
in4570INin
the4571DTthe
district4572NNdistrict
court4573NNcourt
to4574TOto
preserve4575VVpreserve
a4576DTa
substantive4577JJsubstantive
reasonableness4578NNreasonableness
argument4579NNargument
for4580INfor
appeal4581NNappeal
.4582SENT.
In4583INin
particular4584JJparticular
,4585,,
under4586INunder
Rule4587NPRule
514588CD@card@
,4589,,
what4590WPwhat
must4591MDmust
a4592DTa
party4593NNparty
argue4594VVPargue
and4595CCand
when4596WRBwhen
must4597MDmust
they4598PPthey
argue4599VVargue
it4600PPit
?4601SENT?
Let4602VVlet
me4603PPme
start4604VVstart
with4605INwith
the4606DTthe
what4607WPwhat
.4608SENT.
To4609TOTo
preserve4610VVpreserve
a4611DTa
substantive4612JJsubstantive
reasonableness4613NNreasonableness
argument4614NNargument
,4615,,
a4616DTa
party4617NNparty
must4618MDmust
argue4619VVargue
two4620CDtwo
things4621NNSthing
.4622SENT.
One4623CDOne
,4624,,
they4625PPthey
must4626MDmust
make4627VVmake
the4628DTthe
distinct4629JJdistinct
legal4630JJlegal
argument4631NNargument
that4632IN/thatthat
an4633DTan
imposed4634VVNimpose
sentence4635NNsentence
is4636VBZbe
beyond4637INbeyond
the4638DTthe
range4639NNrange
of4640INof
choice4641NNchoice
a4642DTa
district4643NNdistrict
court4644NNcourt
has4645VHZhave
under4646INunder
35534647CD@card@
(4648((
a4649DTa
)4650))
and4651CCand
,4652,,
two4653CDtwo
,4654,,
identify4655VVidentify
the4656DTthe
facts4657NNSfact
and4658CCand
circumstances4659NNScircumstance
supporting4660VVGsupport
that4661DTthat
argument4662NNargument
.4663SENT.
Those4664DTthose
are4665VBPbe
the4666DTthe
legal4667JJlegal
and4668CCand
factual4669JJfactual
grounds4670NNSground
underpinning4671VVGunderpin
a4672DTa
substantive4673JJsubstantive
reasonableness4674NNreasonableness
argument4675NNargument
.4676SENT.
And4677CCand
under4678INunder
the4679DTthe
best4680JJSgood
interpretation4681NNinterpretation
of4682INof
Rule4683NPRule
514684CD@card@
,4685,,
a4686DTa
statement4687NNstatement
of4688INof
grounds4689NNSground
is4690VBZbe
necessary4691JJnecessary
to4692TOto
preserve4693VVpreserve
a4694DTa
claim4695NNclaim
of4696INof
error4697NNerror
.4698SENT.
Now4699RBnow
let4700VVlet
me4701PPme
turn4702VVturn
to4703TOto
the4704DTthe
when4705WRBwhen
.4706SENT.
In4707INin
most4708JJSmost
cases4709NNScase
,4710,,
these4711DTthese
arguments4712NNSargument
are4713VBPbe
most4714RBSmost
sensibly4715RBsensibly
made4716VVNmake
after4717INafter
sentencing4718VVGsentence
because4719INbecause
it4720PPit
's4721VBZbe
only4722RBonly
then4723RBthen
that4724IN/thatthat
the4725DTthe
parties4726NNSparty
know4727VVPknow
the4728DTthe
imposed4729VVNimpose
sentence4730NNsentence
and4731CCand
the4732DTthe
district4733NNdistrict
court4734NNcourt
's4735POS's
reasoning4736NNreasoning
for4737INfor
it4738PPit
.4739SENT.
And4740CCand
in4741INin
most4742JJSmost
cases4743NNScase
,4744,,
I4745PPI
think4746VVPthink
you4747PPyou
need4748VVPneed
to4749TOto
know4750VVknow
those4751DTthose
things4752NNSthing
to4753TOto
really4754RBreally
determine4755VVdetermine
whether4756INwhether
you4757PPyou
have4758VHPhave
a4759DTa
viable4760JJviable
substantive4761JJsubstantive
reasonableness4762NNreasonableness
argument4763NNargument
to4764TOto
assert4765VVassert
.4766SENT.
But4767CCbut
,4768,,
technically4769RBtechnically
,4770,,
nothing4771NNnothing
in4772INin
Rule4773NPRule
514774CD@card@
stops4775NNSstop
a4776DTa
party4777NNparty
from4778INfrom
making4779VVGmake
those4780DTthose
arguments4781NNSargument
prior4782RBprior
to4783TOto
imposition4784NNimposition
of4785INof
a4786DTa
sentence4787NNsentence
,4788,,
and4789CCand
so4790RBso
preservation4791NNpreservation
pre-sentencing4792VVGpre-sentence
is4793VBZbe
possible4794JJpossible
in4795INin
certain4796JJcertain
cases4797NNScase
.4798SENT.
The4799DTthe
government4800NNgovernment
appears4801VVZappear
to4802TOto
agree4803VVagree
with4804INwith
at4805INat
least4806JJSleast
part4807NNpart
of4808INof
this4809DTthis
rule4810NNrule
;4811:;
in4812INin
particular4813JJparticular
,4814,,
the4815DTthe
government4816NNgovernment
agrees4817VVZagree
that4818IN/thatthat
a4819DTa
party4820NNparty
must4821MDmust
present4822VVpresent
the4823DTthe
district4824NNdistrict
court4825NNcourt
with4826INwith
the4827DTthe
facts4828NNSfact
and4829CCand
circumstances4830NNScircumstance
supporting4831VVGsupport
a4832DTa
substantive4833JJsubstantive
reasonableness4834NNreasonableness
argument4835NNargument
in4836INin
order4837NNorder
to4838TOto
rely4839VVrely
...4840:...
rely4841VVrely
on4842INon
those4843DTthose
same4844JJsame
facts4845NNSfact
and4846CCand
circumstances4847NNScircumstance
on4848INon
appeal4849NNappeal
.4850SENT.
And4851CCand
,4852,,
frankly4853RBfrankly
,4854,,
that4855WDTthat
does4856VVZdo
not4857RBnot
seem4858VVseem
to4859TOto
be4860VBbe
a4861DTa
controversial4862JJcontroversial
or4863CCor
novel4864JJnovel
proposition4865NNproposition
.4866SENT.
A4867DTa
party4868NNparty
that4869WDTthat
never4870RBnever
argued4871VVDargue
below4872RBbelow
that4873IN/thatthat
a4874DTa
sentence4875NNsentence
was4876VBDbe
substantively4877RBsubstantively
impermissible4878JJimpermissible
,4879,,
because4880RBbecause
,4881,,
for4882INfor
example4883NNexample
,4884,,
it4885PPit
created4886VVDcreate
unwarranted4887JJunwarranted
sentencing4888NNsentencing
disparities4889NNSdisparity
,4890,,
should4891MDshould
not4892RBnot
be4893VBbe
able4894JJable
to4895TOto
advance4896VVadvance
that4897DTthat
same4898JJsame
argument4899NNargument
for4900INfor
the4901DTthe
first4902JJfirst
time4903NNtime
on4904INon
appeal4905NNappeal
.4906SENT.
The4907DTthe
somewhat4908RBsomewhat
harder4909JJRhard
question4910NNquestion
,4911,,
and4912CCand
the4913DTthe
question4914NNquestion
on4915INon
which4916WDTwhich
I4917PPI
part4918VVPpart
ways4919NNSway
with4920INwith
the4921DTthe
...4922:...
with4923INwith
the4924DTthe
government4925NNgovernment
,4926,,
concerns4927VVZconcern
the4928DTthe
first4929JJfirst
part4930NNpart
of4931INof
the4932DTthe
rule4933NNrule
.4934SENT.
To4935TOTo
preserve4936VVpreserve
a4937DTa
substantive4938JJsubstantive
reasonableness4939NNreasonableness
argument4940NNargument
,4941,,
is4942VBZbe
it4943PPit
simply4944RBsimply
enough4945JJenough
to4946TOto
ask4947VVask
for4948INfor
a4949DTa
shorter4950JJRshort
sentence4951NNsentence
in4952INin
the4953DTthe
district4954NNdistrict
court4955NNcourt
,4956,,
or4957CCor
must4958MDmust
a4959DTa
party4960NNparty
do4961VVPdo
more4962JJRmore
than4963INthan
that4964DTthat
?4965SENT?
And4966CCand
for4967INfor
several4968JJseveral
reasons4969NNSreason
,4970,,
I4971PPI
think4972VVPthink
the4973DTthe
Fifth4974NPFifth
Circuit4975NPCircuit
is4976VBZbe
required4977VVNrequire
...4978:...
correct4979VVcorrect
to4980TOto
require4981VVrequire
parties4982NNSparty
to4983TOto
do4984VVdo
more4985RBRmore
.4986SENT.
Most4987RBSmost
fundamentally4988RBfundamentally
,4989,,
merely4990RBmerely
arguing4991VVGargue
for4992INfor
a4993DTa
shorter4994JJRshort
sentence4995NNsentence
does4996VVZdo
not4997RBnot
address4998VVaddress
the4999DTthe
same5000JJsame
issue5001NNissue
that5002WDTthat
is5003VBZbe
before5004INbefore
the5005DTthe
court5006NNcourt
of5007INof
appeals5008NNSappeal
on5009INon
a5010DTa
substantive5011JJsubstantive
reasonableness5012NNreasonableness
challenge5013NNchallenge
.5014SENT.
The5015DTthe
court5016NNcourt
of5017INof
appeals5018NNSappeal
will5019MDwill
not5020RBnot
evaluate5021VVevaluate
the5022DTthe
reasonableness5023NNreasonableness
of5024INof
the5025DTthe
defendant5026NNdefendant
's5027POS's
requested5028VVNrequest
sentence5029NNsentence
.5030SENT.
Rather5031RBrather
,5032,,
the5033DTthe
court5034NNcourt
will5035MDwill
evaluate5036VVevaluate
the5037DTthe
reasonableness5038NNreasonableness
of5039INof
the5040DTthe
imposed5041VVNimpose
sentence5042NNsentence
.5043SENT.
A5044DTa
party5045NNparty
seeking5046VVGseek
to5047TOto
preserve5048VVpreserve
a5049DTa
substantive5050JJsubstantive
reasonableness5051NNreasonableness
argument5052NNargument
must5053MDmust
present5054VVpresent
that5055DTthat
same5056JJsame
issue5057NNissue
to5058TOto
the5059DTthe
district5060NNdistrict
court5061NNcourt
,5062,,
but5063CCbut
...5064:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5065LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
I5066PPI
think5067VVPthink
one5068PPone
of5069INof
the5070DTthe
strongest5071JJSstrong
things5072NNSthing
Ms5073NNMs
.5074SENT.
Turner5075NPTurner
said5076VVDsay
,5077,,
in5078INin
addition5079NNaddition
to5080TOto
her5081PP$her
legal5082JJlegal
arguments5083NNSargument
,5084,,
was5085VBDbe
that5086IN/thatthat
,5087,,
in5088INin
practice5089NNpractice
,5090,,
this5091DTthis
never5092RBnever
produces5093VVZproduce
a5094DTa
different5095JJdifferent
result5096NNresult
because5097INbecause
the5098DTthe
judge5099NNjudge
,5100,,
presumably5101RBpresumably
,5102,,
has5103VHZhave
already5104RBalready
...5105:...
and5106CCand
in5107INin
reality5108NNreality
,5109,,
has5110VHZhave
already5111RBalready
thought5112VVNthink
about5113INabout
what5114WPwhat
is5115VBZbe
the5116DTthe
reasonable5117JJreasonable
sentence5118NNsentence
.5119SENT.
So5120RBso
for5121INfor
them5122PPthem
to5123TOto
object5124VVobject
I5125PPI
think5126VVthink
that5127WDTthat
's5128VBZbe
unreasonable5129JJunreasonable
is5130VBZbe
going5131VVGgo
to5132TOto
go5133VVgo
nowhere5134RBnowhere
.5135SENT.
So5136RBso
why5137WRBwhy
,5138,,
in5139INin
addition5140NNaddition
to5141TOto
the5142DTthe
legal5143JJlegal
points5144NNSpoint
,5145,,
as5146INas
a5147DTa
practical5148JJpractical
matter5149NNmatter
require5150VVrequire
that5151DTthat
?5152SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]5153LOC[MR. ALLEN]
A5154DTa
couple5155NNcouple
responses5156NNSresponse
to5157TOto
that5158WDTthat
,5159,,
Justice5160NPJustice
Kavanaugh5161NPKavanaugh
.5162SENT.
First5163JJfirst
of5164INof
all5165DTall
,5166,,
I5167PPI
fully5168RBfully
concede5169VVPconcede
that5170IN/thatthat
in5171INin
most5172JJSmost
cases5173NNScase
it5174PPit
probably5175RBprobably
won5176MDwill
't5177RB't
make5178VVmake
much5179RBmuch
of5180INof
a5181DTa
difference5182NNdifference
,5183,,
but5184CCbut
I5185PPI
think5186VVPthink
that5187WDTthat
's5188VBZbe
more5189JJRmore
because5190INbecause
of5191INof
the5192DTthe
very5193RBvery
limited5194JJlimited
nature5195NNnature
of5196INof
substantive5197JJsubstantive
reasonableness5198NNreasonableness
challenges5199NNSchallenge
than5200INthan
it5201PPit
is5202VBZbe
because5203INbecause
of5204INof
the5205DTthe
preservation5206NNpreservation
rules5207NNSrule
.5208SENT.
Substantive5209JJsubstantive
reasonableness5210NNreasonableness
challenges5211NNSchallenge
are5212VBPbe
very5213RBvery
difficult5214JJdifficult
to5215TOto
win5216VVwin
because5217INbecause
,5218,,
most5219JJSmost
of5220INof
the5221DTthe
time5222NNtime
,5223,,
district5224NNdistrict
courts5225NNScourt
are5226VBPbe
sentencing5227VVGsentence
well5228RBwell
within5229INwithin
the5230DTthe
discretion5231NNdiscretion
that5232IN/thatthat
they5233PPthey
have5234VHPhave
.5235SENT.
So5236RBso
I5237PPI
fully5238RBfully
concede5239VVPconcede
that5240IN/thatthat
most5241JJSmost
of5242INof
the5243DTthe
time5244NNtime
it5245PPit
won5246MDwill
't5247RB't
make5248VVmake
a5249DTa
difference5250NNdifference
.5251SENT.
However5252RBhowever
,5253,,
I5254PPI
do5255VVPdo
n't5256RBn't
think5257VVthink
that5258WDTthat
means5259VVZmean
that5260IN/thatthat
it5261PPit
won5262MDwill
't5263RB't
always5264RBalways
have5265VHPhave
some5266DTsome
benefit5267NNbenefit
.5268SENT.
And5269CCand
I5270PPI
think5271VVPthink
it5272PPit
will5273MDwill
have5274VHhave
benefit5275NNbenefit
in5276INin
those5277DTthose
cases5278NNScase
where5279WRBwhere
a5280DTa
substantive5281JJsubstantive
reasonableness5282NNreasonableness
argument5283NNargument
is5284VBZbe
likely5285JJlikely
to5286TOto
have5287VHhave
the5288DTthe
most5289JJSmost
viability5290NNviability
.5291SENT.
And5292CCand
that5293DTthat
's5294VBZbe
a5295DTa
case5296NNcase
in5297INin
which5298WDTwhich
,5299,,
for5300INfor
whatever5301WDTwhatever
reason5302NNreason
,5303,,
the5304DTthe
imposed5305VVNimpose
sentence5306NNsentence
differs5307VVZdiffer
dramatically5308RBdramatically
from5309INfrom
the5310DTthe
sentence5311NNsentence
that5312WDTthat
...5313:...
from5314INfrom
the5315DTthe
guidelines5316NNSguideline
range5317NNrange
and5318CCand
from5319INfrom
the5320DTthe
sentence5321NNsentence
the5322DTthe
parties5323NNSparty
have5324VHPhave
requested5325VVNrequest
.5326SENT.
For5327INfor
example5328NNexample
,5329,,
if5330INif
a5331DTa
defendant5332NNdefendant
requests5333VVZrequest
a5334DTa
40-month5335JJ40-month
sentence5336NNsentence
and5337CCand
the5338DTthe
government5339NNgovernment
...5340:...
the5341DTthe
court5342NNcourt
imposes5343VVZimpose
a5344DTa
200-month5345JJ200-month
sentence5346NNsentence
.5347SENT.
And5348CCand
these5349DTthese
cases5350NNScase
do5351VVPdo
happen5352VVhappen
from5353INfrom
time5354NNtime
to5355TOto
time5356NNtime
in5357INin
the5358DTthe
courts5359NNScourt
of5360INof
appeals5361NNSappeal
.5362SENT.
In5363INin
that5364DTthat
circumstance5365NNcircumstance
,5366,,
I5367PPI
think5368VVPthink
it5369PPit
's5370VBZbe
likely5371JJlikely
that5372IN/thatthat
the5373DTthe
...5374:...
that5375IN/thatthat
the5376DTthe
district5377NNdistrict
court5378NNcourt
has5379VHZhave
used5380VVNuse
reasoning5381NNreasoning
and5382CCand
rationales5383NNSrationale
that5384IN/thatthat
the5385DTthe
parties5386NNSparty
might5387MDmight
not5388RBnot
theretofore5389RBtheretofore
have5390VHhave
addressed5391VVNaddress
or5392CCor
had5393VHDhave
an5394DTan
opportunity5395NNopportunity
to5396TOto
argue5397VVargue
about5398RBabout
.5399SENT.
And5400CCand
so5401RBso
,5402,,
in5403INin
that5404DTthat
situation5405NNsituation
,5406,,
there5407EXthere
is5408VBZbe
some5409DTsome
benefit5410NNbenefit
,5411,,
I5412PPI
think5413VVPthink
,5414,,
to5415TOto
having5416VHGhave
a5417DTa
party5418NNparty
to5419TOto
...5420:...
to5421TOto
...5422:...
to5423TOto
apprise5424VVapprise
the5425DTthe
court5426NNcourt
to5427TOto
say5428VVsay
:5429::
Your5430PP$your
Honor5431NPHonor
,5432,,
I5433PPI
think5434VVPthink
the5435DTthe
sentence5436NNsentence
you5437PPyou
imposed5438VVNimpose
is5439VBZbe
not5440RBnot
only5441RBonly
one5442CDone
I5443PPI
disagree5444VVPdisagree
with5445INwith
but5446CCbut
is5447VBZbe
so5448RBso
excessive5449JJexcessive
,5450,,
it5451PPit
's5452VBZbe
outside5453INoutside
the5454DTthe
range5455NNrange
of5456INof
permissible5457JJpermissible
sentences5458NNSsentence
you5459PPyou
could5460MDcould
impose5461VVimpose
,5462,,
and5463CCand
let5464VVlet
me5465PPme
explain5466VVexplain
to5467TOto
you5468PPyou
why5469WRBwhy
that5470DTthat
is5471VBZbe
.5472SENT.
Let5473VVlet
me5474PPme
engage5475VVengage
with5476INwith
you5477PPyou
on5478INon
some5479DTsome
of5480INof
the5481DTthe
reasoning5482NNreasoning
you5483PPyou
gave5484VVDgive
,5485,,
why5486WRBwhy
the5487DTthe
party5488NNparty
thinks5489VVZthink
the5490DTthe
court5491NNcourt
...5492:...
the5493DTthe
court5494NNcourt
might5495MDmight
have5496VHhave
put5497VVNput
too5498RBtoo
much5499JJmuch
weight5500NNweight
on5501INon
an5502DTan
impermissible5503JJimpermissible
factor5504NNfactor
,5505,,
not5506RBnot
enough5507JJenough
weight5508NNweight
on5509INon
a5510DTa
very5511RBvery
important5512JJimportant
factor5513NNfactor
.5514SENT.
So5515INso
the5516DTthe
short5517JJshort
answer5518NNanswer
is5519VBZbe
,5520,,
in5521INin
most5522JJSmost
cases5523NNScase
,5524,,
it5525PPit
probably5526RBprobably
won5527MDwill
't5528RB't
make5529VVmake
much5530RBmuch
of5531INof
a5532DTa
difference5533NNdifference
,5534,,
but5535CCbut
in5536INin
the5537DTthe
cases5538NNScase
where5539WRBwhere
a5540DTa
substantive5541JJsubstantive
reasonableness5542NNreasonableness
argument5543NNargument
is5544VBZbe
likely5545JJlikely
to5546TOto
matter5547VVmatter
the5548DTthe
most5549JJSmost
,5550,,
it5551PPit
very5552RBvery
well5553RBwell
could5554MDcould
have5555VHhave
...5556:...
could5557MDcould
make5558VVmake
a5559DTa
difference5560NNdifference
.5561SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5562LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
In5563INin
the5564DTthe
case5565NNcase
...5566:...
in5567INin
the5568DTthe
hypo5569NNhypo
you5570PPyou
raised5571VVDraise
,5572,,
the5573DTthe
counsel5574NNcounsel
almost5575RBalmost
always5576RBalways
raise5577VVraise
a5578DTa
procedural5579JJprocedural
failure5580NNfailure
to5581TOto
explain5582VVexplain
.5583SENT.
Objection5584NNobjection
...5585:...
in5586INin
your5587PP$your
hypo5588NNhypo
...5589:...
Judge5590NPJudge
,5591,,
you5592PPyou
have5593VHPhave
n't5594RBn't
explained5595VVNexplain
that5596IN/thatthat
sufficiently5597RBsufficiently
.5598SENT.
Right5599RBright
?5600SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]5601LOC[MR. ALLEN]
Correct5602JJcorrect
.5603SENT.
You5604PPyou
know5605VVPknow
,5606,,
so5607RBso
...5608:...
and5609CCand
I5610PPI
think5611VVPthink
that5612WDTthat
gets5613VVZget
to5614TOto
two5615CDtwo
points5616NNSpoint
.5617SENT.
One5618PPone
is5619VBZbe
I5620PPI
think5621VVPthink
what5622WPwhat
's5623VBZbe
procedural5624JJprocedural
and5625CCand
what5626WPwhat
's5627VBZbe
substance5628NNsubstance
in5629INin
this5630DTthis
circumstance5631NNcircumstance
can5632MDcan
get5633VVget
very5634RBvery
difficult5635JJdifficult
sometimes5636RBsometimes
,5637,,
and5638CCand
it5639PPit
's5640VBZbe
an5641DTan
issue5642NNissue
that5643IN/thatthat
the5644DTthe
courts5645NNScourt
of5646INof
appeals5647NNSappeal
have5648VHPhave
struggled5649VVNstruggle
with5650INwith
.5651SENT.
For5652INfor
example5653NNexample
,5654,,
if5655INif
you5656PPyou
disagree5657VVPdisagree
with5658INwith
the5659DTthe
district5660NNdistrict
court5661NNcourt
's5662POS's
reasoning5663NNreasoning
,5664,,
is5665VBZbe
it5666PPit
a5667DTa
procedural5668JJprocedural
problem5669NNproblem
because5670INbecause
the5671DTthe
court5672NNcourt
failed5673VVDfail
to5674TOto
adequately5675RBadequately
explain5676VVexplain
it5677PPit
,5678,,
or5679CCor
is5680VBZbe
it5681PPit
a5682DTa
substantive5683JJsubstantive
problem5684NNproblem
because5685INbecause
the5686DTthe
court5687NNcourt
explained5688VVDexplain
it5689PPit
,5690,,
you5691PPyou
just5692RBjust
disagree5693VVPdisagree
with5694INwith
the5695DTthe
reasoning5696NNreasoning
the5697DTthe
court5698NNcourt
gave5699VVDgive
?5700SENT?
I5701PPI
think5702VVPthink
it5703PPit
could5704MDcould
be5705VBbe
argued5706VVNargue
either5707DTeither
way5708NNway
.5709SENT.
And5710CCand
I5711PPI
think5712VVPthink
the5713DTthe
courts5714NNScourt
of5715INof
appeals5716NNSappeal
have5717VHPhave
sometimes5718RBsometimes
struggled5719VVNstruggle
with5720INwith
what5721WPwhat
it5722PPit
is5723VBZbe
.5724SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5725LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Well5726UHwell
,5727,,
they5728PPthey
mostly5729RBmostly
get5730VVPget
funneled5731VVNfunnel
into5732INinto
procedural5733JJprocedural
.5734SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]5735LOC[MR. ALLEN]
A5736DTa
lot5737NNlot
of5738INof
times5739NNStime
they5740PPthey
do5741VVPdo
.5742SENT.
And5743CCand
,5744,,
you5745PPyou
know5746VVPknow
,5747,,
as5748RBas
...5749:...
as5750INas
this5751DTthis
Court5752NPCourt
said5753VVDsay
very5754RBvery
clearly5755RBclearly
in5756INin
Gall5757NPGall
,5758,,
you5759PPyou
know5760VVPknow
,5761,,
failure5762NNfailure
to5763TOto
adequately5764RBadequately
explain5765VVexplain
a5766DTa
chosen5767VVNchoose
sentence5768NNsentence
is5769VBZbe
a5770DTa
procedural5771JJprocedural
problem5772NNproblem
that5773IN/thatthat
I5774PPI
think5775VVPthink
everybody5776NNeverybody
standing5777VVGstand
up5778RPup
here5779RBhere
arguing5780VVGargue
today5781NNtoday
agrees5782VVZagree
that5783IN/thatthat
if5784INif
you5785PPyou
think5786VVPthink
a5787DTa
district5788NNdistrict
court5789NNcourt
has5790VHZhave
not5791RBnot
adequately5792RBadequately
explained5793VVDexplain
its5794PP$its
chosen5795VVNchoose
sentence5796NNsentence
,5797,,
a5798DTa
party5799NNparty
should5800MDshould
object5801VVobject
to5802TOto
that5803DTthat
in5804INin
the5805DTthe
district5806NNdistrict
court5807NNcourt
and5808CCand
give5809VVgive
the5810DTthe
district5811NNdistrict
court5812NNcourt
judge5813NNjudge
an5814DTan
opportunity5815NNopportunity
to5816TOto
correct5817VVcorrect
it5818PPit
.5819SENT.
Well5820UHwell
,5821,,
if5822INif
that5823WDTthat
's5824VBZbe
not5825RBnot
true5826JJtrue
...5827:...
if5828INif
that5829WDTthat
's5830VBZbe
true5831JJtrue
,5832,,
I5833PPI
guess5834VVPguess
it5835PPit
's5836VBZbe
hard5837JJhard
for5838INfor
me5839PPme
to5840TOto
see5841VVsee
why5842WRBwhy
a5843DTa
party5844NNparty
should5845MDshould
n't5846RBn't
also5847RBalso
object5848VVobject
if5849INif
they5850PPthey
disagree5851VVPdisagree
with5852INwith
some5853DTsome
of5854INof
the5855DTthe
reasoning5856NNreasoning
the5857DTthe
district5858NNdistrict
court5859NNcourt
gave5860VVDgive
and5861CCand
that5862IN/thatthat
reasoning5863NNreasoning
had5864VHDhave
n't5865RBn't
been5866VBNbe
discussed5867VVNdiscuss
previously5868RBpreviously
in5869INin
sentencing5870NNsentencing
.5871SENT.
In5872INin
that5873DTthat
circumstance5874NNcircumstance
,5875,,
it5876PPit
would5877MDwould
seem5878VVseem
to5879TOto
serve5880VVserve
the5881DTthe
purposes5882NNSpurpose
of5883INof
Rule5884NPRule
515885CD@card@
to5886TOto
have5887VHhave
a5888DTa
rule5889NNrule
that5890WDTthat
asks5891VVZask
the5892DTthe
parties5893NNSparty
to5894TOto
apprise5895VVapprise
the5896DTthe
court5897NNcourt
of5898INof
...5899:...
of5900INof
the5901DTthe
...5902:...
that5903IN/thatthat
the5904DTthe
court5905NNcourt
has5906VHZhave
used5907VVNuse
reasoning5908NNreasoning
or5909CCor
rationales5910NNSrationale
that5911IN/thatthat
the5912DTthe
parties5913NNSparty
disagree5914VVPdisagree
with5915INwith
,5916,,
that5917IN/thatthat
it5918PPit
believes5919VVZbelieve
are5920VBPbe
incorrect5921JJincorrect
,5922,,
that5923IN/thatthat
it5924PPit
believes5925VVZbelieve
are5926VBPbe
impermissible5927JJimpermissible
and5928CCand
have5929VHhave
the5930DTthe
court5931NNcourt
...5932:...
have5933VHPhave
the5934DTthe
parties5935NNSparty
engage5936VVPengage
with5937INwith
the5938DTthe
court5939NNcourt
on5940INon
that5941WDTthat
to5942TOto
give5943VVgive
the5944DTthe
district5945NNdistrict
court5946NNcourt
an5947DTan
opportunity5948NNopportunity
to5949TOto
address5950VVaddress
that5951IN/thatthat
in5952INin
the5953DTthe
first5954JJfirst
instance5955NNinstance
,5956,,
such5957JJsuch
that5958IN/thatthat
the5959DTthe
court5960NNcourt
of5961INof
appeals5962NNSappeal
are5963VBPbe
n't5964RBn't
having5965VHGhave
to5966TOto
address5967VVaddress
it5968PPit
for5969INfor
the5970DTthe
first5971JJfirst
time5972NNtime
on5973INon
appeal5974NNappeal
.5975SENT.
I5976PPI
do5977VVPdo
think5978VVthink
,5979,,
in5980INin
thinking5981VVGthink
about5982INabout
this5983DTthis
,5984,,
the5985DTthe
jury5986NNjury
instruction5987NNinstruction
analogy5988NNanalogy
is5989VBZbe
somewhat5990RBsomewhat
helpful5991JJhelpful
,5992,,
and5993CCand
I5994PPI
would5995MDwould
concede5996VVconcede
that5997IN/thatthat
the5998DTthe
jury5999NNjury
instructions6000NNSinstruction
are6001VBPbe
governed6002VVNgovern
by6003INby
a6004DTa
specific6005JJspecific
rule6006NNrule
,6007,,
the6008DTthe
Federal6009NPFederal
Rules6010NPSRules
of6011INof
Criminal6012NPCriminal
Procedure6013NPProcedure
,6014,,
Rule6015NPRule
306016CD@card@
.6017SENT.
But6018CCbut
,6019,,
in6020INin
the6021DTthe
jury6022NNjury
instruction6023NNinstruction
context6024NNcontext
,6025,,
we6026PPwe
do6027VVPdo
require6028VVrequire
parties6029NNSparty
to6030TOto
object6031VVobject
to6032TOto
a6033DTa
provided6034VVNprovide
instruction6035NNinstruction
if6036INif
they6037PPthey
believe6038VVPbelieve
it6039PPit
's6040VBZbe
impermissible6041JJimpermissible
,6042,,
and6043CCand
we6044PPwe
require6045VVPrequire
that6046IN/thatthat
even6047RBeven
if6048INif
they6049PPthey
had6050VHDhave
previously6051RBpreviously
proposed6052VVNpropose
an6053DTan
instruction6054NNinstruction
to6055TOto
the6056DTthe
district6057NNdistrict
court6058NNcourt
that6059WDTthat
has6060VHZhave
been6061VBNbe
rejected6062VVNreject
.6063SENT.
I6064PPI
think6065VVPthink
the6066DTthe
same6067JJsame
principle6068NNprinciple
applies6069VVZapply
here6070RBhere
.6071SENT.
Just6072RBjust
because6073INbecause
a6074DTa
party6075NNparty
has6076VHZhave
requested6077VVNrequest
a6078DTa
particular6079JJparticular
sentence6080NNsentence
does6081VVZdo
not6082RBnot
mean6083VVmean
they6084PPthey
've6085VHPhave
necessarily6086RBnecessarily
and6087CCand
inevitably6088RBinevitably
argued6089VVDargue
that6090IN/thatthat
the6091DTthe
actually6092RBactually
imposed6093VVNimpose
sentence6094NNsentence
is6095VBZbe
so6096RBso
excessive6097JJexcessive
and6098CCand
so6099RBso
extreme6100JJextreme
that6101IN/thatthat
it6102PPit
's6103VBZbe
outside6104INoutside
the6105DTthe
range6106NNrange
of6107INof
...6108:...
of6109INof
...6110:...
of6111INof
permissible6112JJpermissible
sentences6113NNSsentence
the6114DTthe
court6115NNcourt
could6116MDcould
have6117VHhave
imposed6118VVNimpose
.6119SENT.
The6120DTthe
district6121NNdistrict
court6122NNcourt
...6123:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]6124LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Is6125VBZbe
that6126DTthat
...6127:...
is6128VBZbe
that6129IN/thatthat
the6130DTthe
standard6131NNstandard
,6132,,
so6133RBso
excessive6134JJexcessive
and6135CCand
so6136RBso
extreme6137JJextreme
?6138SENT?
I6139PPI
mean6140VVPmean
,6141,,
the6142DTthe
argument6143NNargument
really6144RBreally
is6145VBZbe
simply6146RBsimply
that6147IN/thatthat
it6148PPit
does6149VVZdo
n't6150RBn't
comply6151VVcomply
with6152INwith
the6153DTthe
factors6154NNSfactor
in6155INin
35536156CD@card@
,6157,,
right6158RBright
?6159SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]6160LOC[MR. ALLEN]
That6161DTthat
is6162VBZbe
the6163DTthe
...6164:...
you6165PPyou
know6166VVPknow
,6167,,
that6168WDTthat
's6169VBZbe
the6170DTthe
...6171:...
the6172DTthe
argument6173NNargument
on6174INon
appeal6175NNappeal
...6176:...
the6177DTthe
excessive6178JJexcessive
or6179CCor
extreme6180JJextreme
is6181VBZbe
my6182PP$my
shorthand6183NNshorthand
.6184SENT.
That6185DTthat
's6186VBZbe
not6187RBnot
the6188DTthe
standard6189NNstandard
that6190IN/thatthat
a6191DTa
substantive6192JJsubstantive
reasonableness6193NNreasonableness
is6194VBZbe
,6195,,
but6196CCbut
I6197PPI
think6198VVPthink
when6199WRBwhen
you6200PPyou
view6201VVPview
substantive6202JJsubstantive
reasonableness6203NNreasonableness
through6204INthrough
the6205DTthe
deferential6206JJdeferential
analysis6207NNanalysis
that6208IN/thatthat
this6209DTthis
Court6210NPCourt
has6211VHZhave
said6212VVNsay
courts6213NNScourt
of6214INof
appeals6215NNSappeal
are6216VBPbe
to6217TOto
apply6218VVapply
to6219TOto
district6220NNdistrict
courts6221NNScourt
,6222,,
generally6223RBgenerally
,6224,,
what6225WPwhat
courts6226VVZcourt
of6227INof
appeals6228NNSappeal
are6229VBPbe
doing6230VVGdo
is6231VBZbe
saying6232VVGsay
,6233,,
we6234PPwe
think6235VVPthink
the6236DTthe
sentence6237NNsentence
you6238PPyou
've6239VHPhave
imposed6240VVNimpose
is6241VBZbe
outside6242INoutside
the6243DTthe
discretion6244NNdiscretion
you6245PPyou
had6246VHDhave
to6247TOto
impose6248VVimpose
the6249DTthe
sentence6250NNsentence
based6251VVNbase
off6252INoff
the6253DTthe
336254CD@card@
(6255((
a6256DTa
)6257))
factors6258NNSfactor
and6259CCand
the6260DTthe
reasons6261NNSreason
you6262PPyou
gave6263VVDgive
,6264,,
the6265DTthe
reasons6266NNSreason
just6267RBjust
...6268:...
even6269RBeven
though6270INthough
district6271NNdistrict
courts6272NNScourt
have6273VHPhave
substantial6274JJsubstantial
discretion6275NNdiscretion
,6276,,
the6277DTthe
reasons6278NNSreason
the6279DTthe
court6280NNcourt
gave6281VVDgive
do6282VVdo
not6283RBnot
support6284VVsupport
the6285DTthe
sentence6286NNsentence
it6287PPit
imposed6288VVDimpose
.6289SENT.
And6290CCand
so6291RBso
,6292,,
yes6293UHyes
,6294,,
it6295PPit
's6296VBZbe
a6297DTa
...6298:...
it6299PPit
's6300VBZbe
...6301:...
the6302DTthe
way6303NNway
this6304DTthis
Court6305NPCourt
put6306VVDput
it6307PPit
in6308INin
Gall6309NPGall
,6310,,
I6311PPI
believe6312VVPbelieve
,6313,,
Mr6314NPMr
.6315SENT.
Chief6316NPChief
Justice6317NPJustice
,6318,,
was6319VBDbe
,6320,,
if6321INif
there6322EXthere
's6323VBZbe
an6324DTan
unusually6325RBunusually
harsh6326JJharsh
or6327CCor
unusually6328RBunusually
lenient6329JJlenient
sentence6330NNsentence
that6331WDTthat
's6332VBZbe
not6333RBnot
justified6334VVNjustify
by6335INby
the6336DTthe
reasons6337NNSreason
the6338DTthe
district6339NNdistrict
court6340NNcourt
gave6341VVDgive
.6342SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6343LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But6344CCbut
,6345,,
Mr6346NPMr
.6347SENT.
Allen6348NPAllen
,6349,,
in6350INin
saying6351VVGsay
what6352WPwhat
you6353PPyou
just6354RBjust
did6355VVDdo
,6356,,
are6357VBPbe
you6358PPyou
suggesting6359VVGsuggest
that6360DTthat
substantive6361JJsubstantive
reasonableness6362NNreasonableness
is6363VBZbe
the6364DTthe
standard6365NNstandard
that6366IN/thatthat
a6367DTa
district6368NNdistrict
court6369NNcourt
should6370MDshould
use6371VVuse
in6372INin
...6373:...
in6374INin
assessing6375VVGassess
what6376WPwhat
the6377DTthe
proper6378JJproper
punishment6379NNpunishment
is6380VBZbe
?6381SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]6382LOC[MR. ALLEN]
I6383PPI
do6384VVPdo
n't6385RBn't
think6386VVthink
so6387RBso
,6388,,
Justice6389NPJustice
Kagan6390NPKagan
.6391SENT.
What6392WPWhat
I6393PPI
...6394:...
I6395PPI
think6396VVPthink
my6397PP$my
argument6398NNargument
is6399VBZbe
not6400RBnot
so6401RBso
much6402JJmuch
that6403IN/thatthat
a6404DTa
district6405NNdistrict
court6406NNcourt
should6407MDshould
be6408VBbe
asking6409VVGask
whether6410INwhether
the6411DTthe
sentence6412NNsentence
is6413VBZbe
substantively6414RBsubstantively
unreasonable6415JJunreasonable
or6416CCor
a6417DTa
party6418NNparty
should6419MDshould
be6420VBbe
saying6421VVGsay
it6422PPit
's6423VBZbe
substantively6424RBsubstantively
unreasonable6425JJunreasonable
in6426INin
the6427DTthe
district6428NNdistrict
court6429NNcourt
.6430SENT.
I6431PPI
think6432VVPthink
I6433PPI
'm6434VBPbe
asking6435VVGask
that6436IN/thatthat
the6437DTthe
...6438:...
the6439DTthe
party6440NNparty
assert6441VVPassert
the6442DTthe
grounds6443NNSground
for6444INfor
that6445DTthat
argument6446NNargument
,6447,,
the6448DTthe
basis6449NNbasis
for6450INfor
that6451DTthat
argument6452NNargument
in6453INin
the6454DTthe
district6455NNdistrict
court6456NNcourt
.6457SENT.
And6458CCand
so6459RBso
,6460,,
when6461WRBwhen
you6462PPyou
think6463VVPthink
about6464INabout
the6465DTthe
purposes6466NNSpurpose
of6467INof
Rule6468NPRule
516469CD@card@
,6470,,
we6471PPwe
want6472VVPwant
parties6473NNSparty
to6474TOto
argue6475VVargue
the6476DTthe
same6477JJsame
thing6478NNthing
in6479INin
the6480DTthe
district6481NNdistrict
court6482NNcourt
that6483IN/thatthat
they6484PPthey
're6485VBPbe
then6486RBthen
going6487VVGgo
to6488TOto
argue6489VVargue
...6490:...
go6491VVgo
on6492INon
to6493TOto
argue6494VVargue
on6495INon
appeal6496NNappeal
.6497SENT.
And6498CCand
the6499DTthe
basis6500NNbasis
for6501INfor
a6502DTa
substantive6503JJsubstantive
reasonableness6504NNreasonableness
argument6505NNargument
,6506,,
I6507PPI
think6508VVPthink
,6509,,
are6510VBPbe
two6511CDtwo
things6512NNSthing
.6513SENT.
One6514PPone
is6515VBZbe
the6516DTthe
sentence6517NNsentence
is6518VBZbe
...6519:...
is6520VBZbe
outside6521INoutside
the6522DTthe
range6523NNrange
of6524INof
permissible6525JJpermissible
sentences6526NNSsentence
that6527WDTthat
could6528MDcould
have6529VHhave
been6530VBNbe
imposed6531VVNimpose
under6532INunder
35536533CD@card@
(6534((
a6535DTa
)6536))
in6537INin
light6538NNlight
of6539INof
the6540DTthe
specific6541JJspecific
facts6542NNSfact
of6543INof
the6544DTthe
case6545NNcase
and6546CCand
,6547,,
two6548CDtwo
,6549,,
the6550DTthe
reasons6551NNSreason
for6552INfor
why6553WRBwhy
that6554DTthat
's6555VBZbe
true6556JJtrue
.6557SENT.
And6558CCand
I6559PPI
think6560VVPthink
the6561DTthe
rule6562NNrule
that6563IN/thatthat
we6564PPwe
've6565VHPhave
put6566VVNput
to6567TOto
the6568DTthe
Court6569NPCourt
and6570CCand
the6571DTthe
rule6572NNrule
that6573IN/thatthat
I6574PPI
think6575VVPthink
the6576DTthe
Fifth6577NPFifth
Circuit6578NPCircuit
applies6579VVZapply
is6580VBZbe
just6581RBjust
asking6582VVGask
parties6583NNSparty
to6584TOto
make6585VVmake
those6586DTthose
same6587JJsame
arguments6588NNSargument
in6589INin
the6590DTthe
district6591NNdistrict
court6592NNcourt
.6593SENT.
That6594DTthat
's6595VBZbe
going6596VVGgo
to6597TOto
be6598VBbe
what6599WPwhat
they6600PPthey
present6601VVPpresent
to6602TOto
the6603DTthe
Fifth6604NPFifth
Circuit6605NPCircuit
or6606CCor
a6607DTa
court6608NNcourt
of6609INof
appeals6610NNSappeal
when6611WRBwhen
they6612PPthey
appeal6613VVPappeal
it6614PPit
.6615SENT.
We6616PPwe
want6617VVPwant
parties6618NNSparty
to6619TOto
make6620VVmake
those6621DTthose
same6622JJsame
...6623:...
the6624DTthe
exact6625JJexact
same6626JJsame
arguments6627NNSargument
in6628INin
the6629DTthe
district6630NNdistrict
court6631NNcourt
.6632SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6633LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
That6634DTthat
does6635VVZdo
n't6636RBn't
seem6637VVseem
to6638TOto
be6639VBbe
what6640WPwhat
the6641DTthe
question6642NNquestion
presented6643VVNpresent
is6644VBZbe
.6645SENT.
I6646PPI
mean6647VVPmean
,6648,,
yes6649UHyes
,6650,,
there6651EXthere
might6652MDmight
be6653VBbe
questions6654NNSquestion
in6655INin
a6656DTa
particular6657JJparticular
case6658NNcase
,6659,,
you6660PPyou
know6661VVPknow
,6662,,
if6663INif
you6664PPyou
say6665VVPsay
the6666DTthe
sentence6667NNsentence
should6668MDshould
be6669VBbe
X6670NNX
because6671INbecause
I6672PPI
cooperated6673VVDcooperate
with6674INwith
the6675DTthe
government6676NNgovernment
and6677CCand
then6678RBthen
the6679DTthe
appeals6680NNSappeal
court6681NNcourt
,6682,,
you6683PPyou
say6684VVPsay
,6685,,
the6686DTthe
sentence6687NNsentence
should6688MDshould
be6689VBbe
X6690NNX
because6691INbecause
I6692PPI
'm6693VBPbe
a6694DTa
very6695RBvery
sick6696JJsick
man6697NNman
,6698,,
you6699PPyou
know6700VVPknow
,6701,,
then6702RBthen
you6703PPyou
have6704VHPhave
an6705DTan
issue6706NNissue
about6707INabout
what6708WDTwhat
grounds6709NNSground
you6710PPyou
presented6711VVDpresent
.6712SENT.
But6713CCbut
that6714DTthat
's6715VBZbe
not6716RBnot
the6717DTthe
issue6718NNissue
that6719WDTthat
's6720VBZbe
presented6721VVNpresent
by6722INby
the6723DTthe
Fifth6724NPFifth
Circu6725NPCircu
it6726PPit
's6727VBZbe
practice6728NNpractice
,6729,,
is6730VBZbe
it6731PPit
?6732SENT?
The6733DTthe
issue6734NNissue
that6735WDTthat
's6736VBZbe
presented6737VVNpresent
by6738INby
the6739DTthe
Fifth6740NPFifth
Circu6741NPCircu
it6742PPit
's6743POS's
practice6744NNpractice
is6745VBZbe
this6746DTthis
requirement6747NNrequirement
that6748WDTthat
...6749:...
that6750IN/thatthat
in6751INin
...6752:...
that6753IN/thatthat
after6754INafter
the6755DTthe
sentence6756NNsentence
is6757VBZbe
given6758VVNgive
in6759INin
the6760DTthe
district6761NNdistrict
court6762NNcourt
,6763,,
the6764DTthe
defendant6765NNdefendant
have6766VHhave
to6767TOto
step6768VVstep
up6769RPup
and6770CCand
say6771VVPsay
,6772,,
you6773PPyou
know6774VVPknow
,6775,,
I6776PPI
object6777VVPobject
to6778TOto
that6779DTthat
,6780,,
Your6781PP$your
Honor6782NPHonor
.6783SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]6784LOC[MR. ALLEN]
So6785INso
I6786PPI
do6787VVPdo
n't6788RBn't
think6789VVthink
that6790WDTthat
's6791VBZbe
actually6792RBactually
what6793WPwhat
the6794DTthe
Fifth6795NPFifth
Circu6796NPCircu
it6797PPit
's6798VBZbe
doing6799VVGdo
in6800INin
practice6801NNpractice
.6802SENT.
And6803CCand
I6804PPI
think6805VVPthink
this6806DTthis
is6807VBZbe
an6808DTan
important6809JJimportant
point6810NNpoint
that6811WDTthat
might6812MDmight
help6813VVhelp
the6814DTthe
Court6815NPCourt
.6816SENT.
I6817PPI
think6818VVPthink
the6819DTthe
Fifth6820NPFifth
Circu6821NPCircu
it6822PPit
's6823POS's
rule6824NNrule
is6825VBZbe
much6826RBmuch
more6827JJRmore
about6828INabout
what6829WPwhat
a6830DTa
party6831NNparty
must6832MDmust
say6833VVsay
than6834INthan
when6835WRBwhen
a6836DTa
party6837NNparty
must6838MDmust
say6839VVsay
it6840PPit
.6841SENT.
We6842PPwe
found6843VVDfind
no6844DTno
Fifth6845NPFifth
Circuit6846NPCircuit
case6847NNcase
in6848INin
which6849WDTwhich
the6850DTthe
Fifth6851NPFifth
Circuit6852NPCircuit
has6853VHZhave
said6854VVNsay
the6855DTthe
timing6856NNtiming
of6857INof
an6858DTan
objection6859NNobjection
is6860VBZbe
dispositive6861JJdispositive
,6862,,
that6863IN/thatthat
where6864WRBwhere
the6865DTthe
Fifth6866NPFifth
Circuit6867NPCircuit
said6868VVDsay
,6869,,
you6870PPyou
clearly6871RBclearly
objected6872VVDobject
to6873TOto
the6874DTthe
substantive6875JJsubstantive
reasonableness6876NNreasonableness
of6877INof
the6878DTthe
sentence6879NNsentence
before6880INbefore
imposition6881NNimposition
of6882INof
a6883DTa
sentence6884NNsentence
,6885,,
but6886CCbut
you6887PPyou
did6888VVDdo
n't6889RBn't
repeat6890VVrepeat
it6891PPit
after6892INafter
...6893:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6894LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
If6895INif
the6896DTthe
Fifth6897NPFifth
Circuit6898NPCircuit
had6899VHDhave
the6900DTthe
rule6901NNrule
that6902IN/thatthat
I6903PPI
'm6904VBPbe
suggesting6905VVGsuggest
the6906DTthe
Fifth6907NPFifth
Circuit6908NPCircuit
has6909VHZhave
and6910CCand
that6911IN/thatthat
you6912PPyou
're6913VBPbe
saying6914VVGsay
it6915PPit
does6916VVZdo
n't6917RBn't
have6918VHhave
,6919,,
the6920DTthe
...6921:...
if6922INif
the6923DTthe
Fifth6924NPFifth
Circuit6925NPCircuit
had6926VHDhave
that6927DTthat
rule6928NNrule
,6929,,
would6930MDwould
it6931PPit
be6932VBbe
a6933DTa
violation6934NNviolation
of6935INof
the6936DTthe
rules6937NNSrule
?6938SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]6939LOC[MR. ALLEN]
I6940PPI
...6941:...
I6942PPI
...6943:...
I6944PPI
do6945VVPdo
n't6946RBn't
think6947VVthink
that6948WDTthat
would6949MDwould
be6950VBbe
the6951DTthe
best6952JJSgood
reading6953NNreading
of6954INof
Rule6955NPRule
516956CD@card@
and6957CCand
that6958WDTthat
's6959VBZbe
not6960RBnot
the6961DTthe
...6962:...
the6963DTthe
approach6964NNapproach
we6965PPwe
've6966VHPhave
put6967VVNput
to6968TOto
the6969DTthe
Court6970NPCourt
.6971SENT.
Again6972RBagain
,6973,,
I6974PPI
do6975VVPdo
n't6976RBn't
think6977VVthink
the6978DTthe
timing6979NNtiming
of6980INof
the6981DTthe
objection6982NNobjection
should6983MDshould
matter6984VVmatter
.6985SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]6986LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
I6987PPI
hate6988VVPhate
to6989TOto
press6990VVpress
that6991IN/thatthat
a6992DTa
little6993JJlittle
bit6994NNbit
...6995:...
[MR. ALLEN]6996LOC[MR. ALLEN]
No6997NPNo
,6998,,
go6999VVPgo
ahead7000RBahead
.7001SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7002LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...7003:...
but7004CCbut
not7005RBnot
the7006DTthe
best7007JJSgood
reading7008NNreading
of7009INof
Rule7010NPRule
517011CD@card@
?7012SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]7013LOC[MR. ALLEN]
It7014PPit
...7015:...
it7016PPit
...7017:...
it7018PPit
...7019:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7020LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Is7021VBZbe
that7022DTthat
...7023:...
[MR. ALLEN]7024LOC[MR. ALLEN]
...7025:...
it7026PPit
would7027MDwould
be7028VBbe
an7029DTan
incorrect7030JJincorrect
reading7031NNreading
of7032INof
Rule7033NPRule
517034CD@card@
...7035:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7036LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Okay7037NPOkay
.7038SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]7039LOC[MR. ALLEN]
...7040:...
to7041TOto
answer7042VVanswer
the7043DTthe
question7044NNquestion
directly7045RBdirectly
.7046SENT.
I7047PPI
do7048VVPdo
n't7049RBn't
think7050VVthink
Rule7051NPRule
517052CD@card@
requires7053VVZrequire
these7054DTthese
objections7055NNSobjection
to7056TOto
be7057VBbe
made7058VVNmake
at7059INat
any7060DTany
specific7061JJspecific
point7062NNpoint
in7063INin
time7064NNtime
during7065INduring
the7066DTthe
sentencing7067NNsentencing
proceeding7068NNproceeding
.7069SENT.
All7070RBall
they7071PPthey
require7072VVPrequire
is7073VBZbe
that7074IN/thatthat
a7075DTa
party7076NNparty
state7077NNstate
the7078DTthe
grounds7079NNSground
at7080INat
some7081DTsome
point7082NNpoint
.7083SENT.
And7084CCand
the7085DTthe
grounds7086NNSground
are7087VBPbe
what7088WPwhat
I7089PPI
started7090VVDstart
off7091RPoff
articulating7092VVGarticulate
my7093PP$my
argument7094NNargument
with7095INwith
.7096SENT.
Now7097RBnow
I7098PPI
think7099VVPthink
most7100RBSmost
sensibly7101RBsensibly
,7102,,
I7103PPI
think7104VVPthink
these7105DTthese
are7106VBPbe
arguments7107NNSargument
that7108WDTthat
should7109MDshould
really7110RBreally
be7111VBbe
made7112VVNmake
after7113INafter
sentencing7114VVGsentence
because7115INbecause
it7116PPit
's7117VBZbe
only7118RBonly
then7119RBthen
that7120IN/thatthat
you7121PPyou
know7122VVPknow
what7123WPwhat
your7124PP$your
sentence7125NNsentence
is7126VBZbe
and7127CCand
what7128WPwhat
the7129DTthe
district7130NNdistrict
court7131NNcourt
's7132POS's
reasons7133NNSreason
for7134INfor
it7135PPit
.7136SENT.
And7137CCand
I7138PPI
think7139VVPthink
only7140RBonly
then7141RBthen
would7142MDwould
you7143PPyou
be7144VBbe
in7145INin
a7146DTa
position7147NNposition
to7148TOto
determine7149VVdetermine
whether7150INwhether
you7151PPyou
have7152VHPhave
a7153DTa
viable7154JJviable
substantive7155JJsubstantive
reasonableness7156NNreasonableness
argument7157NNargument
to7158TOto
make7159VVmake
.7160SENT.
But7161CCbut
...7162:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7163LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well7164UHWell
,7165,,
and7166CCand
maybe7167RBmaybe
not7168RBnot
even7169RBeven
then7170RBthen
.7171SENT.
I7172PPI
mean7173VVPmean
,7174,,
the7175DTthe
question7176NNquestion
of7177INof
what7178WDTwhat
arguments7179NNSargument
you7180PPyou
're7181VBPbe
going7182VVGgo
to7183TOto
raise7184VVraise
on7185INon
appeal7186NNappeal
is7187VBZbe
not7188RBnot
something7189NNsomething
that7190WDTthat
's7191VBZbe
immediately7192RBimmediately
obvious7193JJobvious
when7194WRBwhen
...7195:...
when7196WRBwhen
the7197DTthe
sentence7198NNsentence
comes7199VVZcome
down7200RPdown
.7201SENT.
It7202PPit
's7203VBZbe
something7204NNsomething
that7205WDTthat
usually7206RBusually
requires7207VVZrequire
some7208DTsome
consideration7209NNconsideration
,7210,,
some7211DTsome
tactical7212JJtactical
analysis7213NNanalysis
,7214,,
all7215DTall
sorts7216NNSsort
of7217INof
things7218NNSthing
.7219SENT.
So7220RBso
I7221PPI
wonder7222VVPwonder
what7223WPwhat
specificity7224NNspecificity
you7225PPyou
're7226VBPbe
requiring7227VVGrequire
in7228INin
this7229DTthis
,7230,,
I7231PPI
won7232MDwill
't7233RB't
call7234VVcall
it7235PPit
an7236DTan
exception7237NNexception
since7238INsince
that7239WDTthat
's7240VBZbe
a7241DTa
problem7242NNproblem
for7243INfor
you7244PPyou
,7245,,
but7246CCbut
this7247DTthis
objection7248NNobjection
,7249,,
this7250DTthis
post7251NNpost
hoc7252FWhoc
objection7253NNobjection
?7254SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]7255LOC[MR. ALLEN]
So7256INso
two7257CDtwo
responses7258NNSresponse
to7259TOto
that7260WDTthat
,7261,,
Mr7262NPMr
.7263SENT.
Chief7264NPChief
Justice7265NPJustice
.7266SENT.
One7267PPone
is7268VBZbe
the7269DTthe
concern7270NNconcern
about7271INabout
having7272VHGhave
to7273TOto
think7274VVthink
about7275INabout
arguments7276NNSargument
on7277INon
your7278PP$your
feet7279NNSfoot
is7280VBZbe
n't7281RBn't
unique7282JJunique
to7283TOto
the7284DTthe
sentencing7285NNsentencing
context7286NNcontext
,7287,,
obviously7288RBobviously
.7289SENT.
There7290EXthere
's7291VBZbe
all7292DTall
kinds7293NNSkind
of7294INof
circumstances7295NNScircumstance
in7296INin
criminal7297JJcriminal
trials7298NNStrial
and7299CCand
...7300:...
and7301CCand
other7302JJother
proceedings7303NNSproceeding
where7304WRBwhere
we7305PPwe
do7306VVPdo
expect7307VVexpect
lawyers7308NNSlawyer
to7309TOto
be7310VBbe
on7311INon
their7312PP$their
toes7313NNStoe
in7314INin
court7315NNcourt
and7316CCand
to7317TOto
raise7318VVraise
arguments7319NNSargument
that7320RBthat
...7321:...
that7322WDTthat
come7323VVPcome
up7324RPup
to7325TOto
them7326PPthem
on7327INon
the7328DTthe
spot7329NNspot
.7330SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7331LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Well7332UHWell
,7333,,
yeah7334RByeah
,7335,,
but7336CCbut
I7337PPI
'm7338VBPbe
not7339RBnot
trying7340VVGtry
...7341:...
I7342PPI
do7343VVPdo
n't7344RBn't
mean7345VVmean
think7346VVthink
of7347INof
every7348DTevery
argument7349NNargument
you7350PPyou
have7351VHPhave
.7352SENT.
I7353PPI
mean7354VVPmean
,7355,,
do7356VVPdo
some7357DTsome
...7358:...
figure7359VVPfigure
out7360RPout
,7361,,
well7362UHwell
,7363,,
we7364PPwe
do7365VVPdo
have7366VHhave
an7367DTan
argument7368NNargument
on7369INon
this7370DTthis
point7371NNpoint
,7372,,
but7373CCbut
we7374PPwe
do7375VVPdo
n't7376RBn't
think7377VVthink
we7378PPwe
're7379VBPbe
going7380VVGgo
to7381TOto
...7382:...
if7383INif
we7384PPwe
do7385VVPdo
n't7386RBn't
win7387VVwin
on7388INon
this7389DTthis
point7390NNpoint
,7391,,
we7392PPwe
do7393VVPdo
n't7394RBn't
think7395VVthink
we7396PPwe
'll7397MDwill
win7398VVwin
on7399INon
that7400IN/thatthat
,7401,,
so7402INso
we7403PPwe
're7404VBPbe
only7405RBonly
going7406VVGgo
to7407TOto
make7408VVmake
this7409DTthis
.7410SENT.
I7411PPI
mean7412VVPmean
,7413,,
it7414PPit
's7415VBZbe
a7416DTa
little7417RBlittle
more7418RBRmore
nuanced7419JJnuanced
than7420INthan
objections7421NNSobjection
during7422INduring
the7423DTthe
course7424NNcourse
of7425INof
the7426DTthe
trial7427NNtrial
.7428SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]7429LOC[MR. ALLEN]
Perhaps7430RBperhaps
.7431SENT.
But7432CCbut
I7433PPI
also7434RBalso
think7435VVPthink
that7436IN/thatthat
parties7437NNSparty
do7438VVPdo
do7439VVdo
a7440DTa
tremendous7441JJtremendous
amount7442NNamount
of7443INof
work7444NNwork
going7445VVGgo
in7446INin
to7447TOto
preparing7448VVGprepare
for7449INfor
a7450DTa
sentencing7451NNsentencing
proceeding7452NNproceeding
.7453SENT.
You7454PPyou
know7455VVPknow
,7456,,
they7457PPthey
review7458VVPreview
the7459DTthe
PSR7460NNPSR
.7461SENT.
They7462PPthey
know7463VVPknow
what7464WPwhat
they7465PPthey
're7466VBPbe
going7467VVGgo
to7468TOto
go7469VVgo
in7470RPin
and7471CCand
argue7472VVargue
for7473INfor
on7474INon
behalf7475NNbehalf
of7476INof
their7477PP$their
client7478NNclient
,7479,,
and7480CCand
then7481RBthen
they7482PPthey
can7483MDcan
hear7484VVhear
the7485DTthe
district7486NNdistrict
court7487NNcourt
's7488POS's
reasoning7489NNreasoning
and7490CCand
determine7491VVdetermine
whether7492INwhether
there7493EXthere
's7494VBZbe
something7495NNsomething
in7496INin
that7497DTthat
reasoning7498NNreasoning
that7499IN/thatthat
they7500PPthey
think7501VVPthink
is7502VBZbe
factually7503RBfactually
wrong7504JJwrong
or7505CCor
the7506DTthe
court7507NNcourt
is7508VBZbe
putting7509VVGput
too7510RBtoo
much7511JJmuch
weight7512NNweight
on7513INon
an7514DTan
inappropriate7515JJinappropriate
factor7516NNfactor
or7517CCor
not7518RBnot
enough7519JJenough
weight7520NNweight
on7521INon
a7522DTa
factor7523NNfactor
that7524IN/thatthat
they7525PPthey
think7526VVPthink
is7527VBZbe
very7528RBvery
important7529JJimportant
.7530SENT.
So7531RBso
it7532PPit
might7533MDmight
be7534VBbe
more7535RBRmore
difficult7536JJdifficult
in7537INin
...7538:...
in7539INin
cases7540NNScase
where7541WRBwhere
sentencing7542NNsentencing
proceedings7543NNSproceeding
go7544VVPgo
for7545INfor
an7546DTan
entire7547JJentire
day7548NNday
than7549INthan
it7550PPit
will7551MDwill
be7552VBbe
for7553INfor
a7554DTa
case7555NNcase
like7556INlike
this7557DTthis
one7558CDone
,7559,,
where7560WRBwhere
it7561PPit
took7562VVDtake
five7563CDfive
or7564CCor
six7565CDsix
minutes7566NNSminute
.7567SENT.
But7568CCbut
I7569PPI
do7570VVPdo
n't7571RBn't
think7572VVthink
it7573PPit
's7574VBZbe
unreasonable7575JJunreasonable
to7576TOto
require7577VVrequire
parties7578NNSparty
to7579TOto
do7580VVdo
that7581IN/thatthat
,7582,,
and7583CCand
,7584,,
in7585INin
fact7586NNfact
,7587,,
you7588PPyou
know7589VVPknow
,7590,,
it7591PPit
...7592:...
it7593PPit
...7594:...
it7595PPit
's7596VBZbe
what7597WPwhat
I7598PPI
think7599VVPthink
the7600DTthe
purpose7601NNpurpose
of7602INof
Rule7603NPRule
517604CD@card@
is7605VBZbe
intended7606VVNintend
to7607TOto
serve7608VVserve
,7609,,
which7610WDTwhich
is7611VBZbe
to7612TOto
keep7613VVkeep
defense7614NNdefense
counsel7615NNcounsel
on7616INon
their7617PP$their
toes7618NNStoe
and7619CCand
to7620TOto
alert7621VValert
the7622DTthe
court7623NNcourt
that7624IN/thatthat
they7625PPthey
think7626VVPthink
the7627DTthe
court7628NNcourt
has7629VHZhave
made7630VVNmake
some7631DTsome
error7632NNerror
that7633WDTthat
has7634VHZhave
caused7635VVNcause
it7636PPit
to7637TOto
reach7638VVreach
an7639DTan
incorrect7640JJincorrect
result7641NNresult
,7642,,
so7643RBso
that7644IN/thatthat
the7645DTthe
district7646NNdistrict
court7647NNcourt
is7648VBZbe
considering7649VVGconsider
that7650IN/thatthat
in7651INin
the7652DTthe
first7653JJfirst
instance7654NNinstance
and7655CCand
that7656IN/thatthat
courts7657NNScourt
of7658INof
appeals7659NNSappeal
are7660VBPbe
n't7661RBn't
having7662VHGhave
to7663TOto
consider7664VVconsider
that7665DTthat
.7666SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7667LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Most7668JJSmost
of7669INof
the7670DTthe
grounds7671NNSground
will7672MDwill
have7673VHhave
been7674VBNbe
identified7675VVNidentify
in7676INin
the7677DTthe
sentencing7678NNsentencing
memos7679NNSmemo
after7680INafter
the7681DTthe
PSR7682NNPSR
and7683CCand
at7684INat
the7685DTthe
sentencing7686NNsentencing
hearing7687NNhearing
,7688,,
presumably7689RBpresumably
.7690SENT.
If7691INif
they7692PPthey
've7693VHPhave
all7694RBall
been7695VBNbe
identified7696VVNidentify
there7697RBthere
,7698,,
do7699VVdo
they7700PPthey
...7701:...
do7702VVPdo
you7703PPyou
have7704VHPhave
to7705TOto
raise7706VVraise
it7707PPit
again7708RBagain
in7709INin
your7710PP$your
view7711NNview
?7712SENT?
Do7713VVdo
you7714PPyou
think7715VVthink
that7716WDTthat
's7717VBZbe
the7718DTthe
best7719JJSgood
reading7720NNreading
of7721INof
...7722:...
[MR. ALLEN]7723LOC[MR. ALLEN]
I7724PPI
do7725VVPdo
n't7726RBn't
think7727VVthink
you7728PPyou
have7729VHPhave
to7730TOto
raise7731VVraise
anything7732NNanything
again7733RBagain
.7734SENT.
I7735PPI
...7736:...
I7737PPI
think7738VVPthink
that7739IN/thatthat
would7740MDwould
be7741VBbe
an7742DTan
unreasonable7743JJunreasonable
reading7744NNreading
of7745INof
Rule7746NPRule
517747CD@card@
.7748SENT.
I7749PPI
think7750VVPthink
you7751PPyou
just7752RBjust
have7753VHhave
to7754TOto
preserve7755VVpreserve
them7756PPthem
at7757INat
some7758DTsome
point7759NNpoint
during7760INduring
the7761DTthe
entire7762JJentire
process7763NNprocess
.7764SENT.
So7765RBso
you7766PPyou
do7767VVPdo
n't7768RBn't
have7769VHhave
to7770TOto
repeat7771VVrepeat
arguments7772NNSargument
you7773PPyou
might7774MDmight
have7775VHhave
raised7776VVNraise
in7777INin
a7778DTa
presentencing7779NNpresentencing
memo7780NNmemo
or7781CCor
raised7782VVDraise
earlier7783RBRearlier
in7784INin
the7785DTthe
proceeding7786NNproceeding
.7787SENT.
I7788PPI
just7789RBjust
think7790VVPthink
you7791PPyou
have7792VHPhave
to7793TOto
apprise7794VVapprise
the7795DTthe
court7796NNcourt
at7797INat
some7798DTsome
point7799NNpoint
that7800IN/thatthat
the7801DTthe
sentence7802NNsentence
that7803WDTthat
's7804VBZbe
imposed7805VVNimpose
is7806VBZbe
outside7807INoutside
the7808DTthe
range7809NNrange
of7810INof
permissible7811JJpermissible
sentences7812NNSsentence
it7813PPit
could7814MDcould
impose7815VVimpose
and7816CCand
explain7817VVexplain
why7818WRBwhy
and7819CCand
explain7820VVexplain
...7821:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7822LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Do7823VVPdo
you7824PPyou
think7825VVPthink
there7826EXthere
's7827VBZbe
a7828DTa
lot7829NNlot
of7830INof
daylight7831NNdaylight
between7832INbetween
your7833PP$your
position7834NNposition
and7835CCand
what7836WPwhat
the7837DTthe
government7838NNgovernment
has7839VHZhave
been7840VBNbe
saying7841VVGsay
?7842SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]7843LOC[MR. ALLEN]
The7844DTthe
only7845JJonly
daylight7846NNdaylight
I7847PPI
see7848VVPsee
is7849VBZbe
in7850INin
the7851DTthe
first7852JJfirst
part7853NNpart
of7854INof
my7855PP$my
rule7856NNrule
.7857SENT.
Remember7858VVremember
,7859,,
my7860PP$my
rule7861NNrule
has7862VHZhave
two7863CDtwo
points7864NNSpoint
:7865::
One7866CDOne
is7867VBZbe
you7868PPyou
have7869VHPhave
to7870TOto
make7871VVmake
the7872DTthe
distinct7873JJdistinct
legal7874JJlegal
argument7875NNargument
that7876IN/thatthat
an7877DTan
imposed7878VVNimpose
sentence7879NNsentence
is7880VBZbe
beyond7881INbeyond
the7882DTthe
range7883NNrange
of7884INof
permissible7885JJpermissible
choice7886NNchoice
;7887:;
and7888CCand
then7889RBthen
two7890CDtwo
is7891VBZbe
you7892PPyou
have7893VHPhave
to7894TOto
state7895VVstate
the7896DTthe
facts7897NNSfact
and7898CCand
circumstances7899NNScircumstance
.7900SENT.
The7901DTthe
government7902NNgovernment
agrees7903VVZagree
with7904INwith
part7905NNpart
27906CD2
.7907SENT.
So7908RBso
really7909RBreally
all7910RBall
it7911PPit
is7912VBZbe
,7913,,
I7914PPI
think7915VVPthink
,7916,,
is7917VBZbe
my7918PP$my
requirement7919NNrequirement
to7920TOto
require7921VVrequire
some7922DTsome
more7923JJRmore
specificity7924NNspecificity
that7925IN/thatthat
,7926,,
hey7927UHhey
,7928,,
I7929PPI
'm7930VBPbe
raising7931VVGraise
the7932DTthe
grounds7933NNSground
for7934INfor
a7935DTa
substantive7936JJsubstantive
reasonableness7937NNreasonableness
argument7938NNargument
as7939RBas
opposed7940VVDoppose
to7941TOto
just7942RBjust
simply7943RBsimply
asking7944VVGask
for7945INfor
a7946DTa
shorter7947JJRshort
sentence7948NNsentence
.7949SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7950LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
So7951RBso
if7952INif
...7953:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7954LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And7955CCand
you7956PPyou
...7957:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7958LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Please7959RBplease
.7960SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7961LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Go7962NPGo
ahead7963RBahead
.7964SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7965LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
No7966NPNo
,7967,,
go7968VVPgo
ahead7969RBahead
.7970SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7971LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Go7972NPGo
ahead7973RBahead
.7974SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]7975LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
This7976DTthis
outside7977INoutside
the7978DTthe
range7979NNrange
,7980,,
where7981WRBwhere
...7982:...
where7983WRBwhere
do7984VVPdo
you7985PPyou
think7986VVPthink
that7987IN/thatthat
that7988WDTthat
comes7989VVZcome
from7990INfrom
?7991SENT?
Because7992INbecause
it7993PPit
seems7994VVZseem
to7995TOto
me7996PPme
that7997IN/thatthat
that7998WDTthat
comes7999VVZcome
from8000INfrom
the8001DTthe
reasonableness8002NNreasonableness
,8003,,
the8004DTthe
substantive8005JJsubstantive
reasonableness8006NNreasonableness
standard8007NNstandard
,8008,,
which8009WDTwhich
is8010VBZbe
an8011DTan
appellate8012JJappellate
standard8013NNstandard
.8014SENT.
35538015CD@card@
,8016,,
which8017WDTwhich
is8018VBZbe
the8019DTthe
statute8020NNstatute
that8021WDTthat
's8022VBZbe
directed8023VVNdirect
to8024TOto
the8025DTthe
trial8026NNtrial
judge8027NNjudge
,8028,,
does8029VVZdo
n't8030RBn't
talk8031VVtalk
about8032INabout
ranges8033NNSrange
.8034SENT.
To8035TOTo
the8036DTthe
contrary8037NNcontrary
,8038,,
it8039PPit
talks8040VVZtalk
about8041RBabout
,8042,,
you8043PPyou
know8044VVPknow
,8045,,
there8046EXthere
's8047VBZbe
a8048DTa
particular8049JJparticular
point8050NNpoint
.8051SENT.
And8052CCand
,8053,,
of8054INof
course8055NNcourse
,8056,,
your8057PP$your
particular8058JJparticular
point8059NNpoint
,8060,,
your8061PP$your
particular8062JJparticular
sentence8063NNsentence
might8064MDmight
be8065VBbe
different8066JJdifferent
from8067INfrom
somebody8068NNsomebody
else8069RBelse
's8070POS's
particular8071JJparticular
point8072NNpoint
and8073CCand
particular8074JJparticular
sentence8075NNsentence
,8076,,
and8077CCand
the8078DTthe
appellate8079JJappellate
court8080NNcourt
can8081MDcan
say8082VVsay
,8083,,
you8084PPyou
know8085VVPknow
,8086,,
both8087CCboth
of8088INof
those8089DTthose
are8090VBPbe
within8091INwithin
the8092DTthe
range8093NNrange
of8094INof
reasonableness8095NNreasonableness
.8096SENT.
But8097CCbut
the8098DTthe
range8099NNrange
seems8100VVZseem
a8101DTa
task8102NNtask
for8103INfor
the8104DTthe
appellate8105JJappellate
court8106NNcourt
and8107CCand
not8108RBnot
for8109INfor
the8110DTthe
district8111NNdistrict
court8112NNcourt
.8113SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]8114LOC[MR. ALLEN]
Well8115UHWell
,8116,,
so8117RBso
the8118DTthe
way8119NNway
I8120PPI
read8121VVPread
this8122DTthis
Court8123NPCourt
's8124POS's
decisions8125NNSdecision
in8126INin
Rita8127NPRita
,8128,,
Booker8129NPBooker
,8130,,
and8131CCand
Gall8132NPGall
,8133,,
that8134WDTthat
they8135PPthey
all8136RBall
emphasize8137VVPemphasize
the8138DTthe
extraordinary8139JJextraordinary
amount8140NNamount
of8141INof
discretion8142NNdiscretion
that8143IN/thatthat
courts8144NNScourt
of8145INof
...8146:...
that8147IN/thatthat
district8148NNdistrict
courts8149NNScourt
have8150VHPhave
in8151INin
sentencing8152NNsentencing
.8153SENT.
And8154CCand
I8155PPI
guess8156VVPguess
,8157,,
Justice8158NPJustice
Kagan8159NPKagan
,8160,,
I8161PPI
have8162VHPhave
trouble8163NNtrouble
envisioning8164VVGenvision
,8165,,
kind8166NNkind
of8167INof
imagining8168VVGimagine
what8169WPwhat
that8170DTthat
discretion8171NNdiscretion
is8172VBZbe
if8173INif
it8174PPit
's8175VBZbe
not8176RBnot
discretion8177NNdiscretion
to8178TOto
pick8179VVpick
amongst8180INamongst
a8181DTa
number8182NNnumber
of8183INof
sentence8184NNsentence
all8185RBall
...8186:...
sentences8187NNSsentence
,8188,,
all8189DTall
of8190INof
which8191WDTwhich
are8192VBPbe
sufficient8193JJsufficient
but8194CCbut
not8195RBnot
greater8196JJRgreat
than8197INthan
necessary8198JJnecessary
to8199TOto
serve8200VVserve
the8201DTthe
sentencing8202NNsentencing
purposes8203NNSpurpose
.8204SENT.
I8205PPI
think8206VVPthink
those8207DTthose
decisions8208NNSdecision
seem8209VVPseem
to8210TOto
recognize8211VVrecognize
that8212IN/thatthat
you8213PPyou
could8214MDcould
have8215VHhave
the8216DTthe
same8217JJsame
defendant8218NNdefendant
convicted8219VVNconvict
of8220INof
the8221DTthe
same8222JJsame
crime8223NNcrime
presented8224VVDpresent
to8225TOto
three8226CDthree
different8227JJdifferent
district8228NNdistrict
court8229NNcourt
judges8230NNSjudge
,8231,,
all8232DTall
of8233INof
whom8234WPwhom
...8235:...
[JUSTICE KAGAN]8236LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
Let8237VVlet
me8238PPme
give8239VVgive
...8240:...
[MR. ALLEN]8241LOC[MR. ALLEN]
...8242:...
reach8243VVreach
different8244JJdifferent
sentences8245NNSsentence
.8246SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]8247LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
...8248:...
you8249PPyou
an8250DTan
example8251NNexample
from8252INfrom
a8253DTa
different8254JJdifferent
context8255NNcontext
,8256,,
and8257CCand
it8258PPit
's8259VBZbe
much8260JJmuch
like8261INlike
the8262DTthe
one8263CDone
that8264DTthat
Ms8265NNMs
.8266SENT.
Turner8267NPTurner
gave8268VVDgive
.8269SENT.
I8270PPI
mean8271VVPmean
,8272,,
suppose8273VVPsuppose
we8274PPwe
had8275VHDhave
some8276DTsome
decision8277NNdecision
which8278WDTwhich
is8279VBZbe
subject8280JJsubject
to8281TOto
an8282DTan
abuse8283NNabuse
of8284INof
discretion8285NNdiscretion
standard8286NNstandard
.8287SENT.
What8288WPWhat
we8289PPwe
would8290MDwould
n't8291RBn't
want8292VVwant
to8293TOto
have8294VHhave
happen8295VVhappen
is8296VBZbe
for8297INfor
the8298DTthe
trial8299NNtrial
court8300NNcourt
to8301TOto
be8302VBbe
making8303VVGmake
that8304DTthat
decision8305NNdecision
and8306CCand
saying8307VVGsay
,8308,,
I8309PPI
...8310:...
this8311DTthis
is8312VBZbe
...8313:...
is8314VBZbe
this8315DTthis
an8316DTan
abuse8317NNabuse
of8318INof
discretion8319NNdiscretion
?8320SENT?
No8321UHNo
,8322,,
we8323PPwe
would8324MDwould
want8325VVwant
the8326DTthe
trial8327NNtrial
court8328NNcourt
to8329TOto
be8330VBbe
making8331VVGmake
the8332DTthe
best8333JJSgood
decision8334NNdecision
that8335IN/thatthat
the8336DTthe
court8337NNcourt
can8338MDcan
make8339VVmake
and8340CCand
then8341RBthen
leave8342VVleave
it8343PPit
to8344TOto
the8345DTthe
appellate8346JJappellate
court8347NNcourt
to8348TOto
make8349VVmake
...8350:...
to8351TOto
apply8352VVapply
the8353DTthe
abuse8354NNabuse
of8355INof
discretion8356NNdiscretion
standard8357NNstandard
.8358SENT.
And8359CCand
so8360RBso
too8361RBtoo
here8362RBhere
,8363,,
why8364WRBwhy
is8365VBZbe
n't8366RBn't
the8367DTthe
directive8368NNdirective
to8369TOto
the8370DTthe
trial8371NNtrial
court8372NNcourt
to8373TOto
say8374VVsay
:8375::
Pick8376VVpick
the8377DTthe
sentence8378NNsentence
that8379WDTthat
's8380VBZbe
the8381DTthe
appropriate8382JJappropriate
...8383:...
the8384DTthe
single8385JJsingle
appropriate8386JJappropriate
sentence8387NNsentence
you8388PPyou
think8389VVPthink
under8390INunder
35538391CD@card@
,8392,,
and8393CCand
then8394RBthen
it8395PPit
's8396VBZbe
for8397INfor
the8398DTthe
appellate8399JJappellate
court8400NNcourt
to8401TOto
say8402VVsay
whether8403INwhether
that8404WDTthat
falls8405VVZfall
within8406INwithin
the8407DTthe
range8408NNrange
of8409INof
reasonableness8410NNreasonableness
?8411SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]8412LOC[MR. ALLEN]
So8413INso
I8414PPI
...8415:...
I8416PPI
...8417:...
I8418PPI
want8419VVPwant
to8420TOto
be8421VBbe
very8422RBvery
clear8423JJclear
.8424SENT.
I8425PPI
do8426VVPdo
think8427VVthink
it8428PPit
's8429VBZbe
still8430RBstill
the8431DTthe
district8432NNdistrict
court8433NNcourt
's8434POS's
job8435NNjob
to8436TOto
pick8437VVpick
the8438DTthe
sentence8439NNsentence
that8440WDTthat
's8441VBZbe
sufficient8442JJsufficient
but8443CCbut
not8444RBnot
greater8445JJRgreat
than8446INthan
necessary8447JJnecessary
.8448SENT.
And8449CCand
I8450PPI
...8451:...
I8452PPI
do8453VVPdo
n't8454RBn't
think8455VVthink
courts8456NNScourt
should8457MDshould
be8458VBbe
thinking8459VVGthink
about8460INabout
this8461DTthis
in8462INin
terms8463NNSterm
of8464INof
what8465WPwhat
's8466VBZbe
reasonable8467JJreasonable
or8468CCor
abuse8469NNabuse
of8470INof
discretion8471NNdiscretion
.8472SENT.
But8473CCbut
I8474PPI
do8475VVPdo
think8476VVthink
that8477DTthat
...8478:...
that8479IN/thatthat
we8480PPwe
still8481RBstill
want8482VVPwant
to8483TOto
require8484VVrequire
parties8485NNSparty
to8486TOto
speak8487VVspeak
up8488RPup
and8489CCand
object8490VVobject
if8491INif
they8492PPthey
believe8493VVPbelieve
that8494DTthat
...8495:...
that8496IN/thatthat
the8497DTthe
sentence8498NNsentence
the8499DTthe
district8500NNdistrict
court8501NNcourt
has8502VHZhave
imposed8503VVNimpose
is8504VBZbe
not8505RBnot
just8506RBjust
one8507CDone
that8508WDTthat
they8509PPthey
disagree8510VVPdisagree
with8511INwith
but8512CCbut
one8513CDone
that8514WDTthat
has8515VHZhave
given8516VVNgive
rise8517NNrise
to8518TOto
a8519DTa
new8520JJnew
argument8521NNargument
that8522IN/thatthat
they8523PPthey
're8524VBPbe
going8525VVGgo
to8526TOto
make8527VVmake
on8528INon
appeal8529NNappeal
,8530,,
which8531WDTwhich
is8532VBZbe
that8533IN/thatthat
,8534,,
Your8535PP$your
Honor8536NPHonor
,8537,,
the8538DTthe
sentence8539NNsentence
is8540VBZbe
not8541RBnot
just8542RBjust
one8543CDone
that8544WDTthat
I8545PPI
think8546VVPthink
is8547VBZbe
an8548DTan
exercise8549NNexercise
of8550INof
discretion8551NNdiscretion
that8552IN/thatthat
I8553PPI
disagree8554VVPdisagree
with8555INwith
;8556:;
it8557PPit
's8558VBZbe
one8559CDone
that8560WDTthat
's8561VBZbe
outside8562INoutside
the8563DTthe
range8564NNrange
of8565INof
discretion8566NNdiscretion
that8567IN/thatthat
I8568PPI
think8569VVPthink
this8570DTthis
Court8571NPCourt
has8572VHZhave
in8573INin
the8574DTthe
...8575:...
in8576INin
the8577DTthe
first8578JJfirst
instance8579NNinstance
.8580SENT.
[JUSTICE KAGAN]8581LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN]
But8582CCbut
there8583EXthere
are8584VBPbe
many8585JJmany
examples8586NNSexample
where8587WRBwhere
that8588WDTthat
might8589MDmight
occur8590VVoccur
,8591,,
you8592PPyou
know8593VVPknow
,8594,,
you8595PPyou
ask8596VVPask
the8597DTthe
trial8598NNtrial
court8599NNcourt
to8600TOto
do8601VVdo
something8602NNsomething
,8603,,
it8604PPit
says8605VVZsay
no8606RBno
.8607SENT.
And8608CCand
then8609RBthen
,8610,,
in8611INin
all8612PDTall
these8613DTthese
non-sentencing8614JJnon-sentencing
contexts8615NNScontext
,8616,,
do8617VVPdo
you8618PPyou
have8619VHPhave
to8620TOto
say8621VVsay
,8622,,
you8623PPyou
know8624VVPknow
,8625,,
Your8626PP$your
Honor8627NPHonor
,8628,,
not8629RBnot
only8630RBonly
is8631VBZbe
that8632IN/thatthat
not8633RBnot
what8634WPwhat
I8635PPI
asked8636VVDask
you8637PPyou
to8638TOto
do8639VVdo
,8640,,
but8641CCbut
it8642PPit
's8643VBZbe
also8644RBalso
an8645DTan
abuse8646NNabuse
of8647INof
discretion8648NNdiscretion
?8649SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]8650LOC[MR. ALLEN]
The8651DTthe
short8652JJshort
answer8653NNanswer
is8654VBZbe
no8655UHno
,8656,,
I8657PPI
do8658VVPdo
n't8659RBn't
think8660VVthink
so8661RBso
in8662INin
those8663DTthose
other8664JJother
contexts8665NNScontext
.8666SENT.
The8667DTthe
longer8668JJRlong
answer8669NNanswer
is8670VBZbe
I8671PPI
do8672VVPdo
think8673VVthink
there8674EXthere
are8675VBPbe
some8676DTsome
contexts8677NNScontext
in8678INin
which8679WDTwhich
we8680PPwe
do8681VVPdo
require8682VVrequire
something8683NNsomething
similar8684JJsimilar
to8685TOto
what8686WPwhat
I8687PPI
'm8688VBPbe
asking8689VVGask
for8690INfor
here8691RBhere
.8692SENT.
Jury8693NNjury
instructions8694NNSinstruction
is8695VBZbe
probably8696RBprobably
the8697DTthe
best8698JJSgood
example8699NNexample
,8700,,
because8701INbecause
district8702NNdistrict
court8703NNcourt
judges8704NNSjudge
do8705VVPdo
have8706VHPhave
discretion8707NNdiscretion
in8708INin
how8709WRBhow
they8710PPthey
shape8711VVPshape
jury8712NNjury
instructions8713NNSinstruction
,8714,,
and8715CCand
Rule8716NPRule
308717CD@card@
does8718VVZdo
require8719VVrequire
that8720IN/thatthat
if8721INif
you8722PPyou
think8723VVPthink
the8724DTthe
district8725NNdistrict
court8726NNcourt
has8727VHZhave
kind8728NNkind
of8729INof
gone8730VVNgo
outside8731INoutside
the8732DTthe
bounds8733NNSbound
of8734INof
what8735WPwhat
it8736PPit
can8737MDcan
do8738VVdo
in8739INin
the8740DTthe
jury8741NNjury
instruction8742NNinstruction
context8743NNcontext
,8744,,
you8745PPyou
do8746VVPdo
have8747VHhave
to8748TOto
apprise8749VVapprise
the8750DTthe
court8751NNcourt
of8752INof
that8753DTthat
.8754SENT.
I8755PPI
think8756VVPthink
sentencing8757NNsentencing
should8758MDshould
be8759VBbe
a8760DTa
...8761:...
a8762DTa
context8763NNcontext
in8764INin
which8765WDTwhich
we8766PPwe
require8767VVPrequire
something8768NNsomething
similar8769JJsimilar
to8770TOto
that8771DTthat
because8772INbecause
of8773INof
the8774DTthe
parsimony8775NNparsimony
principle8776NNprinciple
in8777INin
35538778CD@card@
(8779((
a8780DTa
)8781))
,8782,,
because8783INbecause
of8784INof
the8785DTthe
...8786:...
the8787DTthe
significance8788NNsignificance
...8789:...
the8790DTthe
...8791:...
the8792DTthe
...8793:...
you8794PPyou
know8795VVPknow
,8796,,
the8797DTthe
significant8798JJsignificant
guided8799VVNguide
nature8800NNnature
of8801INof
the8802DTthe
court8803NNcourt
's8804POS's
discretion8805NNdiscretion
and8806CCand
the8807DTthe
obligation8808NNobligation
...8809:...
special8810JJspecial
obligation8811NNobligation
the8812DTthe
court8813NNcourt
has8814VHZhave
to8815TOto
explain8816VVexplain
its8817PP$its
sentencing8818NNsentencing
...8819:...
sentence8820NNsentence
under8821INunder
258822CD@card@
35538823CD@card@
(8824((
c8825LSc
)8826))
.8827SENT.
So8828INso
the8829DTthe
short8830JJshort
answer8831NNanswer
is8832VBZbe
I8833PPI
would8834MDwould
not8835RBnot
require8836VVrequire
the8837DTthe
same8838JJsame
requirement8839NNrequirement
in8840INin
those8841DTthose
other8842JJother
contexts8843NNScontext
.8844SENT.
The8845DTthe
reason8846NNreason
we8847PPwe
would8848MDwould
...8849:...
I8850PPI
think8851VVPthink
we8852PPwe
should8853MDshould
require8854VVrequire
it8855PPit
here8856RBhere
is8857VBZbe
sentencing8858VVGsentence
...8859:...
sentencing8860NNsentencing
is8861VBZbe
meaningfully8862RBmeaningfully
different8863JJdifferent
.8864SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8865LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Even8866RBeven
...8867:...
under8868INunder
the8869DTthe
Fifth8870NPFifth
Circu8871NPCircu
it8872PPit
's8873VBZbe
rule8874NNrule
,8875,,
even8876RBeven
if8877INif
you8878PPyou
do8879VVPdo
n't8880RBn't
object8881VVobject
,8882,,
it8883PPit
's8884VBZbe
going8885VVGgo
to8886TOto
be8887VBbe
reviewed8888VVNreview
for8889INfor
plain8890JJplain
error8891NNerror
on8892INon
appeal8893NNappeal
.8894SENT.
And8895CCand
I8896PPI
'll8897MDwill
ask8898VVask
the8899DTthe
same8900JJsame
question8901NNquestion
I8902PPI
asked8903VVDask
Ms8904NNMs
.8905SENT.
Ratner8906NPRatner
,8907,,
which8908WDTwhich
is8909VBZbe
,8910,,
can8911MDcan
you8912PPyou
imagine8913VVimagine
a8914DTa
sentence8915NNsentence
that8916WDTthat
's8917VBZbe
substantively8918RBsubstantively
unreasonable8919JJunreasonable
but8920CCbut
not8921RBnot
plain8922JJplain
error8923NNerror
?8924SENT?
Because8925RBbecause
,8926,,
usually8927RBusually
,8928,,
when8929WRBwhen
judges8930NNSjudge
find8931VVPfind
...8932:...
appellate8933JJappellate
judges8934NNSjudge
find8935VVPfind
it8936PPit
's8937VBZbe
substantively8938RBsubstantively
unreasonable8939JJunreasonable
,8940,,
they8941PPthey
're8942VBPbe
saying8943VVGsay
,8944,,
wow8945VVwow
,8946,,
the8947DTthe
district8948NNdistrict
judge8949NNjudge
really8950RBreally
jumped8951VVDjump
the8952DTthe
rails8953NNSrail
there8954RBthere
.8955SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]8956LOC[MR. ALLEN]
Yeah8957NPYeah
.8958SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8959LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And8960CCand
that8961IN/thatthat
sounds8962NNSsound
...8963:...
and8964CCand
that8965DTthat
's8966VBZbe
the8967DTthe
common8968JJcommon
reaction8969NNreaction
that8970WDTthat
...8971:...
to8972TOto
a8973DTa
sentence8974NNsentence
that8975WDTthat
is8976VBZbe
found8977VVNfind
substantively8978RBsubstantively
unreasonable8979JJunreasonable
,8980,,
and8981CCand
that8982IN/thatthat
sounds8983NNSsound
like8984INlike
plain8985JJplain
error8986NNerror
.8987SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]8988LOC[MR. ALLEN]
I8989PPI
agree8990VVPagree
with8991INwith
Ms8992NNMs
.8993SENT.
Ratner8994NPRatner
on8995INon
this8996DTthis
.8997SENT.
I8998PPI
...8999:...
I9000PPI
...9001:...
I9002PPI
think9003VVPthink
there9004EXthere
is9005VBZbe
some9006DTsome
daylight9007NNdaylight
between9008INbetween
plain9009JJplain
error9010NNerror
and9011CCand
abuse9012NNabuse
of9013INof
discretion9014NNdiscretion
,9015,,
probably9016RBprobably
not9017RBnot
much9018JJmuch
.9019SENT.
I9020PPI
do9021VVPdo
think9022VVthink
many9023JJmany
sentences9024NNSsentence
that9025WDTthat
are9026VBPbe
deemed9027VVNdeem
substantively9028RBsubstantively
unreasonable9029JJunreasonable
will9030MDwill
like9031VVlike
satisfy9032VVsatisfy
plain9033JJplain
error9034NNerror
review9035NNreview
.9036SENT.
But9037CCbut
I9038PPI
do9039VVPdo
n't9040RBn't
think9041VVthink
the9042DTthe
...9043:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9044LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
It9045PPit
's9046VBZbe
exceedingly9047RBexceedingly
rare9048JJrare
for9049INfor
an9050DTan
appellate9051JJappellate
court9052NNcourt
to9053TOto
find9054VVfind
a9055DTa
sentence9056NNsentence
substantively9057RBsubstantively
unreasonable9058JJunreasonable
.9059SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]9060LOC[MR. ALLEN]
It9061PPit
's9062VBZbe
exceedingly9063RBexceedingly
rare9064JJrare
.9065SENT.
Yes9066UHyes
,9067,,
Justice9068NPJustice
Kavanaugh9069NPKavanaugh
.9070SENT.
But9071CCbut
I9072PPI
do9073VVPdo
n't9074RBn't
think9075VVthink
that9076WDTthat
's9077VBZbe
an9078DTan
issue9079NNissue
this9080DTthis
Court9081NPCourt
should9082MDshould
prejudge9083VVprejudge
because9084INbecause
plain9085JJplain
error9086NNerror
review9087NNreview
,9088,,
as9089INas
this9090DTthis
Court9091NPCourt
has9092VHZhave
said9093VVNsay
,9094,,
is9095VBZbe
a9096DTa
very9097RBvery
fact-intensive9098JJfact-intensive
case-by-case9099JJcase-by-case
determination9100NNdetermination
,9101,,
and9102CCand
so9103RBso
I9104PPI
do9105VVPdo
n't9106RBn't
think9107VVthink
the9108DTthe
Court9109NPCourt
should9110MDshould
just9111RBjust
say9112VVsay
,9113,,
well9114RBwell
,9115,,
every9116DTevery
substantively9117RBsubstantively
unreasonable9118JJunreasonable
sentence9119NNsentence
will9120MDwill
be9121VBbe
plain9122JJplain
error9123NNerror
.9124SENT.
It9125PPit
might9126MDmight
well9127RBwell
turn9128VVturn
out9129RPout
to9130TOto
be9131VBbe
the9132DTthe
case9133NNcase
...9134:...
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9135LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
Yeah9136NPYeah
.9137SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]9138LOC[MR. ALLEN]
...9139:...
but9140CCbut
I9141PPI
do9142VVPdo
n't9143RBn't
think9144VVthink
the9145DTthe
Court9146NPCourt
should9147MDshould
prejudge9148VVprejudge
that9149DTthat
.9150SENT.
And9151CCand
just9152RBjust
...9153:...
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9154LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
By9155INby
substantively9156RBsubstantively
unreasonable9157JJunreasonable
,9158,,
you9159PPyou
mean9160VVPmean
nothing9161NNnothing
more9162JJRmore
than9163INthan
an9164DTan
erroneous9165JJerroneous
application9166NNapplication
of9167INof
the9168DTthe
35539169CD@card@
standards9170NNSstandard
,9171,,
right9172RBright
?9173SENT?
[MR. ALLEN]9174LOC[MR. ALLEN]
Well9175UHWell
,9176,,
correct9177JJcorrect
,9178,,
Mr9179NPMr
.9180SENT.
Chief9181NPChief
Justice9182NPJustice
,9183,,
although9184INalthough
it9185PPit
would9186MDwould
have9187VHhave
to9188TOto
be9189VBbe
so9190RBso
erroneous9191JJerroneous
that9192IN/thatthat
it9193PPit
falls9194VVZfall
outside9195INoutside
the9196DTthe
range9197NNrange
of9198INof
substantial9199JJsubstantial
discretion9200NNdiscretion
that9201IN/thatthat
we9202PPwe
understand9203VVPunderstand
district9204NNdistrict
courts9205NNScourt
to9206TOto
have9207VHhave
at9208INat
sentencing9209NNsentencing
.9210SENT.
So9211RBso
it9212PPit
's9213VBZbe
not9214RBnot
just9215RBjust
it9216PPit
's9217VBZbe
wrong9218JJwrong
.9219SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9220LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
And9221CCand
the9222DTthe
way9223NNway
49224CD4
it9225PPit
's9226VBZbe
...9227:...
[MR. ALLEN]9228LOC[MR. ALLEN]
It9229PPit
's9230VBZbe
very9231RBvery
wrong9232JJwrong
.9233SENT.
[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9234LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]
...9235:...
the9236DTthe
way9237NNway
it9238PPit
's9239VBZbe
articulated9240VVNarticulate
in9241INin
many9242JJmany
of9243INof
the9244DTthe
appellate9245JJappellate
courts9246NNScourt
is9247VBZbe
very9248RBvery
deferentially9249RBdeferentially
articulated9250VVNarticulate
.9251SENT.
[MR. ALLEN]9252LOC[MR. ALLEN]
That9253DTthat
's9254VBZbe
correct9255JJcorrect
,9256,,
Justice9257NPJustice
Kavanaugh9258NPKavanaugh
.9259SENT.
There9260EXthere
's9261VBZbe
one9262CDone
question9263NNquestion
you9264PPyou
asked9265VVDask
that9266DTthat
...9267:...
that9268IN/thatthat
I9269PPI
did9270VVDdo
want9271VVwant
to9272TOto
address9273VVaddress
.9274SENT.
You9275PPyou
asked9276VVDask
the9277DTthe
government9278NNgovernment
of9279INof
...9280:...
what9281WPwhat
would9282MDwould
happen9283VVhappen
in9284INin
a9285DTa
situation9286NNsituation
where9287WRBwhere
we9288PPwe
...9289:...
you9290PPyou
have9291VHPhave
some9292DTsome
preserved9293VVNpreserve
arguments9294NNSargument
and9295CCand
some9296DTsome
unpreserved9297JJunpreserved
arguments9298NNSargument
and9299CCand
some9300DTsome
of9301INof
which9302WDTwhich
are9303VBPbe
subject9304JJsubject
to9305TOto
plain9306JJplain
error9307NNerror
and9308CCand
some9309DTsome
of9310INof
which9311WDTwhich
subject9312JJsubject
to9313TOto
harmless9314JJharmless
error9315NNerror
review9316NNreview
,9317,,
for9318INfor
example9319NNexample
.9320SENT.
That9321DTthat
does9322VVZdo
come9323VVcome
up9324RPup
in9325INin
other9326JJother
circumstances9327NNScircumstance
.9328SENT.
We9329PPwe
were9330VBDbe
looking9331VVGlook
into9332INinto
this9333DTthis
.9334SENT.
It9335PPit
...9336:...
it9337PPit
comes9338VVZcome
up9339RPup
in9340INin
cumulative9341JJcumulative
error9342NNerror
circumstance9343NNcircumstance
where9344WRBwhere
parties9345NNSparty
are9346VBPbe
arguing9347VVGargue
cumulative9348JJcumulative
error9349NNerror
,9350,,
there9351EXthere
were9352VBDbe
a9353DTa
number9354NNnumber
of9355INof
errors9356NNSerror
below9357RBbelow
,9358,,
some9359DTsome
of9360INof
which9361WDTwhich
were9362VBDbe
preserved9363VVNpreserve
,9364,,
some9365DTsome
of9366INof
which9367WDTwhich
were9368VBDbe
not9369RBnot
.9370SENT.
It9371PPit
can9372MDcan
come9373VVcome
up9374RPup
in9375INin
the9376DTthe
ineffective9377JJineffective
assistance9378NNassistance
of9379INof
counsel9380NNcounsel
area9381NNarea
,9382,,
where9383WRBwhere
you9384PPyou
argue9385VVPargue
that9386IN/thatthat
counsel9387NNcounsel
was9388VBDbe
ineffective9389JJineffective
for9390INfor
some9391DTsome
reasons9392NNSreason
but9393CCbut
not9394RBnot
others9395NNSother
.9396SENT.
The9397DTthe
short9398JJshort
answer9399NNanswer
is9400VBZbe
it9401PPit
's9402VBZbe
...9403:...
it9404PPit
can9405MDcan
be9406VBbe
difficult9407JJdifficult
,9408,,
but9409CCbut
courts9410NNScourt
of9411INof
appeals9412NNSappeal
have9413VHPhave
found9414VVNfind
ways9415NNSway
to9416TOto
deal9417VVdeal
with9418INwith
it9419PPit
.9420SENT.
And9421CCand
the9422DTthe
way9423NNway
they9424PPthey
do9425VVPdo
it9426PPit
is9427VBZbe
typically9428RBtypically
what9429WPwhat
Ms9430NNMs
.9431SENT.
Ratner9432NPRatner
said9433VVDsay
,9434,,
they9435PPthey
start9436VVPstart
by9437INby
looking9438VVGlook
at9439INat
the9440DTthe
preserved9441VVNpreserve
errors9442NNSerror
,9443,,
sort9444NNsort
through9445INthrough
those9446DTthose
to9447TOto
see9448VVsee
whether9449INwhether
there9450EXthere
's9451VBZbe
any9452DTany
grounds9453NNSground
to9454TOto
reverse9455VVreverse
on9456INon
that9457DTthat
,9458,,
and9459CCand
then9460RBthen
go9461VVgo
to9462TOto
the9463DTthe
...9464:...
to9465TOto
the9466DTthe
unpreserved9467JJunpreserved
errors9468NNSerror
.9469SENT.
But9470CCbut
I9471PPI
guess9472VVPguess
the9473DTthe
point9474NNpoint
I9475PPI
would9476MDwould
make9477VVmake
is9478VBZbe
courts9479NNScourt
of9480INof
appeals9481NNSappeal
have9482VHPhave
found9483VVNfind
a9484DTa
way9485NNway
to9486TOto
deal9487VVdeal
with9488INwith
it9489PPit
.9490SENT.
They9491PPthey
have9492VHPhave
n't9493RBn't
just9494RBjust
said9495VVDsay
,9496,,
oh9497UHoh
,9498,,
just9499RBjust
because9500INbecause
...9501:...
you9502PPyou
know9503VVPknow
,9504,,
because9505INbecause
we9506PPwe
have9507VHPhave
this9508DTthis
problem9509NNproblem
,9510,,
we9511PPwe
're9512VBPbe
just9513RBjust
going9514VVGgo
to9515TOto
assume9516VVassume
everything9517NNeverything
is9518VBZbe
preserved9519VVNpreserve
and9520CCand
...9521:...
and9522CCand
go9523VVgo
on9524INon
to9525TOto
...9526:...
to9527TOto
consider9528VVconsider
it9529PPit
.9530SENT.
A9531DTa
couple9532NNcouple
more9533JJRmore
points9534NNSpoint
,9535,,
Mr9536NPMr
.9537SENT.
Chief9538NPChief
Justice9539NPJustice
.9540SENT.
One9541CDOne
thing9542NNthing
this9543DTthis
Court9544NPCourt
had9545VHDhave
said9546VVNsay
in9547INin
Gall9548NPGall
I9549PPI
think9550VVPthink
is9551VBZbe
helpful9552JJhelpful
in9553INin
thinking9554VVGthink
about9555INabout
this9556DTthis
.9557SENT.
This9558DTthis
Court9559NPCourt
said9560VVDsay
in9561INin
Gall9562NPGall
that9563IN/thatthat
if9564INif
a9565DTa
district9566NNdistrict
court9567NNcourt
judge9568NNjudge
determines9569VVZdetermine
that9570IN/thatthat
an9571DTan
outside9572JJoutside
guideline9573NNguideline
sentence9574NNsentence
is9575VBZbe
warranted9576VVNwarrant
,9577,,
he9578PPhe
must9579MDmust
"9580``"
consider9581VVconsider
the9582DTthe
extent9583NNextent
of9584INof
the9585DTthe
deviation9586NNdeviation
and9587CCand
ensure9588VVensure
that9589IN/thatthat
the9590DTthe
justification9591NNjustification
is9592VBZbe
sufficiently9593RBsufficiently
compelling9594JJcompelling
to9595TOto
support9596VVsupport
the9597DTthe
degree9598NNdegree
of9599INof
the9600DTthe
variance9601NNvariance
.9602SENT.
"9603''"
Well9604UHwell
,9605,,
I9606PPI
think9607VVPthink
,9608,,
in9609INin
most9610JJSmost
cases9611NNScase
,9612,,
you9613PPyou
won9614MDwill
't9615RB't
know9616VVknow
whether9617INwhether
the9618DTthe
district9619NNdistrict
court9620NNcourt
's9621POS's
justification9622NNjustification
is9623VBZbe
sufficiently9624RBsufficiently
compelling9625JJcompelling
until9626INuntil
you9627PPyou
hear9628VVPhear
the9629DTthe
court9630NNcourt
's9631POS's
sentence9632NNsentence
and9633CCand
the9634DTthe
reasons9635NNSreason
for9636INfor
it9637PPit
.9638SENT.
It9639PPit
's9640VBZbe
only9641RBonly
then9642RBthen
whether9643INwhether
you9644PPyou
can9645MDcan
assess9646VVassess
whether9647INwhether
the9648DTthe
justifications9649NNSjustification
are9650VBPbe
sufficient9651JJsufficient
to9652TOto
support9653VVsupport
the9654DTthe
unusually9655RBunusually
harsh9656JJharsh
or9657CCor
unusually9658RBunusually
lenient9659JJlenient
sentence9660NNsentence
.9661SENT.
And9662CCand
if9663INif
it9664PPit
's9665VBZbe
not9666RBnot
,9667,,
I9668PPI
...9669:...
I9670PPI
think9671VVPthink
it9672PPit
's9673VBZbe
reasonable9674JJreasonable
,9675,,
I9676PPI
think9677VVPthink
,9678,,
to9679TOto
require9680VVrequire
a9681DTa
party9682NNparty
to9683TOto
object9684VVobject
and9685CCand
explain9686VVexplain
to9687TOto
the9688DTthe
court9689NNcourt
why9690WRBwhy
that9691DTthat
's9692VBZbe
true9693JJtrue
.9694SENT.
And9695CCand
I9696PPI
think9697VVPthink
that9698WDTthat
's9699VBZbe
something9700NNsomething
that9701IN/thatthat
Rule9702NPRule
519703CD@card@
reasonably9704RBreasonably
requires9705VVZrequire
in9706RPin
...9707:...
in9708INin
asking9709VVGask
parties9710NNSparty
to9711TOto
preserve9712VVpreserve
their9713PP$their
grounds9714NNSground
for9715INfor
the9716DTthe
argument9717NNargument
.9718SENT.
If9719INif
there9720EXthere
are9721VBPbe
no9722RBno
further9723JJRfurther
questions9724NNSquestion
,9725,,
let9726VVlet
me9727PPme
leave9728VVleave
the9729DTthe
Court9730NPCourt
with9731INwith
one9732CDone
final9733JJfinal
thought9734NNthought
in9735INin
thinking9736VVGthink
about9737INabout
this9738DTthis
case9739NNcase
.9740SENT.
I9741PPI
think9742VVPthink
it9743PPit
's9744VBZbe
beneficial9745JJbeneficial
to9746TOto
consider9747VVconsider
not9748RBnot
the9749DTthe
run-of-the-mill9750JJrun-of-the-mill
sentencing9751NNsentencing
case9752NNcase
but9753CCbut
the9754DTthe
sentencing9755NNsentencing
proceeding9756NNproceeding
in9757INin
which9758WDTwhich
a9759DTa
...9760:...
a9761DTa
substantive9762JJsubstantive
reasonableness9763NNreasonableness
argument9764NNargument
is9765VBZbe
likely9766JJlikely
to9767TOto
have9768VHhave
the9769DTthe
most9770JJSmost
viability9771NNviability
.9772SENT.
And9773CCand
that9774DTthat
's9775VBZbe
when9776WRBwhen
an9777DTan
imposed9778VVNimpose
sentence9779NNsentence
differs9780VVZdiffer
dramatically9781RBdramatically
from9782INfrom
the9783DTthe
guidelines9784NNSguideline
range9785NNrange
and9786CCand
likely9787RBlikely
the9788DTthe
sentence9789NNsentence
that9790IN/thatthat
the9791DTthe
parties9792NNSparty
have9793VHPhave
been9794VBNbe
advocating9795VVGadvocate
before9796INbefore
it9797PPit
.9798SENT.
In9799INin
that9800DTthat
circumstance9801NNcircumstance
,9802,,
I9803PPI
think9804VVPthink
it9805PPit
's9806VBZbe
important9807JJimportant
to9808TOto
craft9809VVcraft
a9810DTa
rule9811NNrule
that9812WDTthat
asks9813VVZask
the9814DTthe
parties9815NNSparty
to9816TOto
engage9817VVengage
with9818INwith
the9819DTthe
district9820NNdistrict
court9821NNcourt
about9822INabout
the9823DTthe
sentence9824NNsentence
it9825PPit
imposed9826VVDimpose
and9827CCand
the9828DTthe
reasons9829NNSreason
that9830IN/thatthat
it9831PPit
gave9832VVDgive
for9833INfor
doing9834VVGdo
so9835RBso
.9836SENT.
Otherwise9837RBotherwise
,9838,,
courts9839NNScourt
of9840INof
appeals9841NNSappeal
will9842MDwill
have9843VHhave
to9844TOto
address9845VVaddress
that9846DTthat
...9847:...
that9848DTthat
...9849:...
address9850VVaddress
those9851DTthose
issues9852NNSissue
in9853INin
the9854DTthe
first9855JJfirst
instance9856NNinstance
.9857SENT.
The9858DTthe
better9859JJRgood
rule9860NNrule
,9861,,
I9862PPI
think9863VVPthink
,9864,,
is9865VBZbe
if9866INif
a9867DTa
party9868NNparty
believes9869VVZbelieve
that9870IN/thatthat
an9871DTan
imposed9872VVNimpose
sentence9873NNsentence
is9874VBZbe
so9875RBso
excessive9876JJexcessive
that9877IN/thatthat
it9878PPit
's9879VBZbe
beyond9880INbeyond
the9881DTthe
range9882NNrange
of9883INof
choice9884NNchoice
that9885IN/thatthat
35539886CD@card@
(9887((
a9888DTa
)9889))
allows9890VVZallow
,9891,,
they9892PPthey
should9893MDshould
make9894VVmake
that9895DTthat
specific9896JJspecific
argument9897NNargument
to9898TOto
the9899DTthe
district9900NNdistrict
court9901NNcourt
and9902CCand
identify9903VVidentify
the9904DTthe
facts9905NNSfact
and9906CCand
circumstances9907NNScircumstance
supporting9908VVGsupport
it9909PPit
.9910SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9911LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank9912VVthank
you9913PPyou
,9914,,
counsel9915NNcounsel
.9916SENT.
Two9917CDTwo
minutes9918NNSminute
,9919,,
Ms9920NNMs
.9921SENT.
Ratner9922NPRatner
.9923SENT.
I9924PPI
'm9925VBPbe
sorry9926JJsorry
,9927,,
Ms9928NNMs
.9929SENT.
Turner9930NPTurner
.9931SENT.
[MS. TURNER]9932LOC[MS. TURNER]
Thank9933VVthank
you9934PPyou
,9935,,
Mr9936NPMr
.9937SENT.
Chief9938NPChief
Justice9939NPJustice
.9940SENT.
The9941DTthe
amicus9942NNamicus
's9943POS's
test9944NNtest
is9945VBZbe
trying9946VVGtry
to9947TOto
fix9948VVfix
a9949DTa
problem9950NNproblem
that9951WDTthat
does9952VVZdo
not9953RBnot
exist9954VVexist
.9955SENT.
Nine9956CDNine
courts9957NNScourt
of9958INof
appeals9959NNSappeal
show9960VVPshow
that9961IN/thatthat
the9962DTthe
Fifth9963NPFifth
Circu9964NPCircu
it9965PPit
's9966POS's
rule9967NNrule
is9968VBZbe
not9969RBnot
necessary9970JJnecessary
to9971TOto
the9972DTthe
effective9973JJeffective
functioning9974NNfunctioning
of9975INof
courts9976NNScourt
.9977SENT.
Not9978RBnot
only9979RBonly
is9980VBZbe
it9981PPit
not9982RBnot
necessary9983JJnecessary
to9984TOto
the9985DTthe
effective9986JJeffective
functioning9987NNfunctioning
of9988INof
courts9989NNScourt
,9990,,
it9991PPit
is9992VBZbe
inconsistent9993JJinconsistent
with9994INwith
Rule9995NPRule
519996CD@card@
in9997INin
two9998CDtwo
ways9999NNSway
.10000SENT.
First10001NPFirst
is10002VBZbe
insofar10003RBinsofar
as10004INas
it10005PPit
requires10006VVZrequire
a10007DTa
post-sentencing10008NNpost-sentencing
objection10009NNobjection
that10010WDTthat
is10011VBZbe
inconsistent10012JJinconsistent
with10013INwith
both10014DTboth
part10015NNpart
(10016((
a10017DTa
)10018))
and10019CCand
part10020VVpart
(10021((
b10022LSb
)10023))
of10024INof
the10025DTthe
rule10026NNrule
,10027,,
which10028WDTwhich
express10029VVPexpress
...10030:...
part10031VVpart
(10032((
b10033LSb
)10034))
expressly10035RBexpressly
makes10036VVZmake
clear10037JJclear
that10038IN/thatthat
exceptions10039NNSexception
are10040VBPbe
not10041RBnot
required10042VVNrequire
.10043SENT.
Second10044RBsecond
,10045,,
to10046TOto
frame10047VVframe
the10048DTthe
argument10049NNargument
in10050INin
terms10051NNSterm
of10052INof
substantive10053JJsubstantive
reasonableness10054NNreasonableness
or10055CCor
the10056DTthe
other10057JJother
articulations10058NNSarticulation
that10059IN/thatthat
my10060PP$my
friend10061NNfriend
used10062VVDuse
,10063,,
outside10064INoutside
the10065DTthe
range10066NNrange
of10067INof
reasonableness10068NNreasonableness
,10069,,
abuse10070NNabuse
of10071INof
discretion10072NNdiscretion
,10073,,
that10074WDTthat
's10075VBZbe
just10076RBjust
the10077DTthe
appellate10078JJappellate
standard10079NNstandard
of10080INof
review10081NNreview
.10082SENT.
And10083CCand
there10084EXthere
is10085VBZbe
no10086DTno
need10087NNneed
to10088TOto
frame10089VVframe
objections10090NNSobjection
in10091INin
district10092NNdistrict
court10093NNcourt
in10094INin
terms10095NNSterm
...10096:...
in10097INin
those10098DTthose
terms10099NNSterm
.10100SENT.
And10101CCand
,10102,,
second10103RBsecond
,10104,,
Rule10105NPRule
5110106CD@card@
just10107RBjust
says10108VVZsay
that10109IN/thatthat
parties10110NNSparty
are10111VBPbe
required10112VVNrequire
to10113TOto
tell10114VVtell
the10115DTthe
court10116NNcourt
what10117WDTwhat
action10118NNaction
the10119DTthe
party10120NNparty
wants10121VVZwant
the10122DTthe
court10123NNcourt
to10124TOto
take10125VVtake
.10126SENT.
This10127DTthis
facts-and-circumstances10128NNSfacts-and-circumstances
argument10129NNargument
is10130VBZbe
,10131,,
as10132INas
Justice10133NPJustice
Kagan10134NPKagan
remarked10135VVDremark
,10136,,
outside10137INoutside
the10138DTthe
question10139NNquestion
presented10140VVDpresent
.10141SENT.
But10142CCbut
just10143RBjust
to10144TOto
briefly10145RBbriefly
say10146VVsay
a10147DTa
few10148JJfew
things10149NNSthing
,10150,,
all10151RBall
we10152PPwe
are10153VBPbe
asking10154VVGask
this10155DTthis
Court10156NPCourt
to10157TOto
do10158VVdo
is10159VBZbe
to10160TOto
leave10161VVleave
it10162PPit
to10163TOto
...10164:...
to10165TOto
lower10166JJRlow
courts10167NNScourt
to10168TOto
apply10169VVapply
the10170DTthe
same10171JJsame
fair10172JJfair
notice10173NNnotice
standard10174NNstandard
that10175IN/thatthat
they10176PPthey
apply10177VVPapply
in10178INin
other10179JJother
contexts10180NNScontext
in10181INin
this10182DTthis
context10183NNcontext
,10184,,
and10185CCand
the10186DTthe
grounds10187NNSground
language10188NNlanguage
that10189IN/thatthat
my10190PP$my
friend10191NNfriend
is10192VBZbe
relying10193VVGrely
on10194INon
is10195VBZbe
not10196RBnot
found10197VVNfind
anywhere10198RBanywhere
in10199INin
Rule10200NPRule
5110201CD@card@
.10202SENT.
It10203PPit
is10204VBZbe
only10205JJonly
...10206:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10207LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Where10208WRBwhere
do10209VVPdo
you10210PPyou
disagree10211VVPdisagree
with10212INwith
the10213DTthe
government10214NNgovernment
?10215SENT?
Where10216WRBwhere
do10217VVPdo
you10218PPyou
disagree10219VVPdisagree
with10220INwith
the10221DTthe
government10222NNgovernment
?10223SENT?
[MS. TURNER]10224LOC[MS. TURNER]
The10225NPThe
...10226:...
well10227UHwell
,10228,,
I10229PPI
think10230VVPthink
the10231DTthe
government10232NNgovernment
's10233POS's
position10234NNposition
and10235CCand
our10236PP$our
position10237NNposition
is10238VBZbe
...10239:...
are10240VBPbe
very10241RBvery
close10242JJclose
.10243SENT.
I10244PPI
think10245VVPthink
...10246:...
[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10247LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]
Where10248WRBwhere
is10249VBZbe
the10250DTthe
window10251NNwindow
where10252WRBwhere
it10253PPit
's10254VBZbe
not10255RBnot
?10256SENT?
[MS. TURNER]10257LOC[MS. TURNER]
Where10258WRBwhere
we10259PPwe
might10260MDmight
disagree10261VVdisagree
is10262VBZbe
about10263RBabout
when10264WRBwhen
arguments10265NNSargument
are10266VBPbe
preserved10267VVNpreserve
,10268,,
when10269WRBwhen
a10270DTa
district10271NNdistrict
court10272NNcourt
has10273VHZhave
fair10274JJfair
notice10275NNnotice
.10276SENT.
I10277PPI
think10278VVPthink
we10279PPwe
both10280DTboth
agree10281VVPagree
that10282IN/thatthat
the10283DTthe
fair10284JJfair
notice10285NNnotice
standard10286NNstandard
applies10287VVZapply
,10288,,
but10289CCbut
we10290PPwe
might10291MDmight
find10292VVfind
more10293JJRmore
arguments10294NNSargument
...10295:...
that10296IN/thatthat
the10297DTthe
district10298NNdistrict
court10299NNcourt
had10300VHDhave
more10301JJRmore
...10302:...
had10303VHDhave
fair10304JJfair
notice10305NNnotice
of10306INof
more10307JJRmore
arguments10308NNSargument
than10309INthan
the10310DTthe
...10311:...
than10312INthan
the10313DTthe
government10314NNgovernment
is10315VBZbe
willing10316JJwilling
to10317TOto
concede10318VVconcede
.10319SENT.
So10320RBso
,10321,,
for10322INfor
example10323NNexample
,10324,,
here10325RBhere
,10326,,
I10327PPI
think10328VVPthink
they10329PPthey
...10330:...
they10331PPthey
are10332VBPbe
not10333RBnot
...10334:...
do10335VVPdo
n't10336RBn't
expressly10337RBexpressly
address10338VVaddress
the10339DTthe
public10340JJpublic
dangerousness10341NNdangerousness
argument10342NNargument
that10343IN/thatthat
we10344PPwe
raised10345VVDraise
below10346RBbelow
.10347SENT.
But10348CCbut
that10349DTthat
's10350VBZbe
an10351DTan
area10352NNarea
where10353WRBwhere
we10354PPwe
disagree10355VVPdisagree
.10356SENT.
But10357CCbut
,10358,,
as10359INas
I10360PPI
was10361VBDbe
saying10362VVGsay
,10363,,
in10364INin
Rule10365NPRule
4610366CD@card@
,10367,,
there10368EXthere
is10369VBZbe
this10370DTthis
grounds10371NNSground
language10372NNlanguage
.10373SENT.
It10374PPit
is10375VBZbe
not10376RBnot
present10377JJpresent
in10378INin
Rule10379NPRule
5110380CD@card@
,10381,,
and10382CCand
Rule10383NPRule
5110384CD@card@
postdates10385VVZpostdate
Rule10386NPRule
4610387CD@card@
.10388SENT.
So10389INso
the10390DTthe
rule10391NNrule
enactors10392NNSenactors
clearly10393RBclearly
knew10394VVDknow
how10395WRBhow
to10396TOto
require10397VVrequire
that10398IN/thatthat
if10399INif
they10400PPthey
wanted10401VVDwant
to10402TOto
.10403SENT.
But10404CCbut
even10405RBeven
if10406INif
you10407PPyou
think10408VVPthink
there10409EXthere
is10410VBZbe
some10411DTsome
sort10412NNsort
of10413INof
grounds10414NNSground
requirement10415NNrequirement
in10416INin
Rule10417NPRule
5110418CD@card@
that10419WDTthat
's10420VBZbe
sort10421NNsort
of10422INof
implied10423VVNimply
,10424,,
all10425PDTall
that10426DTthat
means10427NNmeans
is10428VBZbe
that10429IN/thatthat
the10430DTthe
party10431NNparty
needs10432VVZneed
to10433TOto
preserve10434VVpreserve
the10435DTthe
legal10436JJlegal
grounds10437NNSground
on10438INon
which10439WDTwhich
they10440PPthey
are10441VBPbe
relying10442VVGrely
.10443SENT.
It10444PPit
does10445VVZdo
not10446RBnot
mean10447VVmean
they10448PPthey
have10449VHPhave
to10450TOto
preserve10451VVpreserve
every10452DTevery
fact10453NNfact
and10454CCand
circumstance10455NNcircumstance
.10456SENT.
Finally10457RBfinally
,10458,,
as10459INas
I10460PPI
mentioned10461VVDmention
earlier10462RBRearlier
in10463INin
response10464NNresponse
to10465TOto
Justice10466NPJustice
Sotomayor10467NPSotomayor
's10468POS's
questions10469NNSquestion
,10470,,
this10471DTthis
facts-and-circumstances10472NNSfacts-and-circumstances
test10473NNtest
would10474MDwould
mire10475VVmire
the10476DTthe
courts10477NNScourt
in10478INin
very10479RBvery
fact-bound10480JJfact-bound
disputes10481NNSdispute
.10482SENT.
Thank10483VVthank
you10484PPyou
.10485SENT.
[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]10486LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]
Thank10487VVthank
you10488PPyou
,10489,,
counsel10490NNcounsel
.10491SENT.
Mr10492NPMr
.10493SENT.
Allen10494NPAllen
,10495,,
this10496DTthis
Court10497NPCourt
appointed10498VVDappoint
you10499PPyou
to10500TOto
brief10501VVbrief
and10502CCand
argue10503VVargue
this10504DTthis
case10505NNcase
as10506INas
an10507DTan
amicus10508NNamicus
curiae10509NNScuria
in10510INin
support10511NNsupport
of10512INof
the10513DTthe
judgment10514NNjudgment
below10515RBbelow
.10516SENT.
You10517PPyou
have10518VHPhave
ably10519RBably
discharged10520VVNdischarge
that10521DTthat
responsibility10522NNresponsibility
,10523,,
for10524INfor
which10525WDTwhich
we10526PPwe
are10527VBPbe
grateful10528JJgrateful
.10529SENT.
The10530DTthe
case10531NNcase
is10532VBZbe
submitted10533VVNsubmit
.10534SENT.