<s> /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/ptreetagger/Holguin-Hernandez.xml-src.tt /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/corpora/SUPREMECOURTUSV4-3/treetagger/Holguin-Hernandez.xml-out.tt pos tagset built from model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par en lemma of the model /Users/loicliegeois/TXM-0.8.1/treetagger-models/en.par - [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] We2PPwe 'll3MDwill hear4VVhear argument5NNargument next6JJnext in7INin Case8NPCase 18-77399CD@card@ ,10,, Holguin-Hernandez11NPHolguin-Hernandez versus12CCversus United13NPUnited States14NPSStates .15SENT. Ms16NNMs .17SENT. Turner18NPTurner .19SENT.

[MS. TURNER]20LOC[MS. TURNER] Thank21VVthank you22PPyou ,23,, Mr24NPMr .25SENT. Chief26NPChief Justice27NPJustice ,28,, and29CCand may30MDmay it31PPit please32VVplease the33DTthe Court34NPCourt :35:: Rule36NNrule 5137CD@card@ tells38VVZtell parties39NNSparty to40TOto criminal41JJcriminal proceedings42NNSproceeding how43WRBhow to44TOto preserve45VVpreserve claims46NNSclaim of47INof error48NNerror for49INfor appeal50NNappeal .51SENT. A52DTa party53NNparty does54VVZdo so55RBso by56INby telling57VVGtell the58DTthe court59NNcourt what60WDTwhat action61NNaction the62DTthe party63NNparty wants64VVZwant the65DTthe court66NNcourt to67TOto take68VVtake when69WRBwhen a70DTa ruling71NNruling is72VBZbe made73VVNmake or74CCor sought75VVNseek .76SENT. There77EXthere 's78VBZbe no79DTno need80NNneed to81TOto tell82VVtell the83DTthe court84NNcourt twice85RBtwice .86SENT. In87INin every88DTevery federal89JJfederal court90NNcourt of91INof appeals92NNSappeal except93INexcept the94DTthe Fifth95NPFifth Circuit96NPCircuit ,97,, this98DTthis rule99NNrule means100VVZmean what101WPwhat it102PPit says103VVZsay in104INin the105DTthe context106NNcontext of107INof sentencing108NNsentencing proceedings109NNSproceeding .110SENT. Specifically111RBspecifically ,112,, it113PPit means114VVZmean that115IN/thatthat a116DTa criminal117JJcriminal defendant118NNdefendant who119WPwho argues120VVZargue for121INfor a122DTa particular123JJparticular sentence124NNsentence in125INin district126NNdistrict court127NNcourt preserves128VVZpreserve for129INfor appeal130NNappeal a131DTa challenge132NNchallenge to133TOto a134DTa longer135JJRlong sentence136NNsentence .137SENT. In138INin the139DTthe Fifth140NPFifth Circuit141NPCircuit ,142,, however143RBhowever ,144,, a145DTa criminal146JJcriminal defendant147NNdefendant ,148,, like149INlike Petitioner150NNpetitioner here151RBhere ,152,, must153MDmust argue154VVargue for155INfor a156DTa particular157JJparticular sentence158NNsentence in159INin district160NNdistrict court161NNcourt during162INduring the163DTthe sentencing164NNsentencing hearing165NNhearing and166CCand must167MDmust object168VVobject to169TOto any170DTany longer171JJRlong sentence172NNsentence as173INas substantively174RBsubstantively unreasonable175JJunreasonable after176INafter the177DTthe sentence178NNsentence issues179NNSissue .180SENT. That181DTthat post-sentencing182NNpost-sentencing objection183NNobjection requirement184NNrequirement flouts185VVZflout Rule186NPRule 51187CD@card@ ,188,, which189WDTwhich expressly190RBexpressly says191VVZsay that192IN/thatthat exceptions193NNSexception are194VBPbe not195RBnot required196VVNrequire .197SENT. Nor198CCnor is199VBZbe there200RBthere any201DTany practical202JJpractical merit203NNmerit to204TOto the205DTthe Fifth206NPFifth Circu207NPCircu it208PPit 's209VBZbe rule210NNrule .211SENT. In212INin fact213NNfact ,214,, there215EXthere 's216VBZbe no217DTno evidence218NNevidence that219IN/thatthat a220DTa district221NNdistrict court222NNcourt has223VHZhave ever224RBever reconsidered225VVNreconsider a226DTa sentence227NNsentence in228INin light229NNlight of230INof a231DTa post-sentencing232NNpost-sentencing objection233NNobjection .234SENT. And235CCand that236WDTthat makes237VVZmake sense238NNsense .239SENT. The240DTthe sentencing241NNsentencing court242NNcourt will243MDwill have244VHhave just245RBjust heard246VVNhear and247CCand rejected248VVNreject the249DTthe same250JJsame arguments251NNSargument in252INin issuing253VVGissue a254DTa sentence255NNsentence .256SENT. Recognizing257VVGrecognize that258IN/thatthat the259DTthe Fifth260NPFifth Circu261NPCircu it262PPit 's263POS's rule264NNrule is265VBZbe indefensible266JJindefensible ,267,, the268DTthe government269NNgovernment does270VVZdo not271RBnot defend272VVdefend it273PPit .274SENT. Instead275RBinstead ,276,, it277PPit supports278VVZsupport amicus279NNamicus ...280:... or281CCor Petitioner282NNpetitioner here283RBhere .284SENT. An285DTan amicus286NNamicus tries287VVZtry to288TOto defend289VVdefend the290DTthe judgment291NNjudgment below292INbelow on293INon alternative294JJalternative grounds295NNSground .296SENT. According297VVGaccord to298TOto amicus299NNamicus ,300,, a301DTa party302NNparty must303MDmust identify304VVidentify the305DTthe length306NNlength beyond307INbeyond which308WDTwhich a309DTa sentence310NNsentence is311VBZbe substantively312RBsubstantively unreasonable313JJunreasonable .314SENT. But315CCbut substantive316JJsubstantive reasonableness317NNreasonableness is318VBZbe not319RBnot a320DTa free-standing321JJfree-standing requirement322NNrequirement under323INunder the324DTthe Sentencing325NNsentencing Reform326NPReform Act327NPAct .328SENT. It329PPit is330VBZbe simply331RBsimply a332DTa standard333NNstandard of334INof appellate335JJappellate review336NNreview .337SENT. And338CCand there339EXthere is340VBZbe no341DTno need342NNneed for343INfor parties344NNSparty to345TOto frame346VVframe their347PP$their claims348NNSclaim in349INin terms350NNSterm of351INof that352DTthat standard353NNstandard of354INof appellate355JJappellate review356NNreview while357INwhile they358PPthey are359VBPbe still360RBstill in361INin district362NNdistrict court363NNcourt ,364,, just365RBjust as366INas they367PPthey need368VVPneed not369RBnot frame370VVframe their371PP$their objections372NNSobjection to373TOto evidentiary374JJevidentiary rulings375NNSruling in376INin terms377NNSterm of378INof abuse379NNabuse of380INof discretion381NNdiscretion or382CCor to383TOto factual384JJfactual findings385NNSfinding in386INin terms387NNSterm of388INof clear389JJclear error390NNerror while391INwhile they392PPthey are393VBPbe still394RBstill in395INin the396DTthe trial397NNtrial court398NNcourt .399SENT. Because400INbecause Petitioner401NNpetitioner here402RBhere adequately403RBadequately preserved404VVNpreserve his405PP$his challenge406NNchallenge to407TOto the408DTthe length409NNlength of410INof his411PP$his sentence412NNsentence ,413,, this414DTthis Court415NPCourt should416MDshould reverse417VVreverse .418SENT. I419PPI 'm420VBPbe open421JJopen to422TOto questions423NNSquestion .424SENT. But425CCbut ,426,, if427INif you428PPyou have429VHPhave none430NNnone ,431,, there432EXthere are433VBPbe really434RBreally two435CDtwo problems436NNSproblem .437SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]438LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well439UHwell ,440,, I441PPI 'll442MDwill ask443VVask ...444:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]445LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] The446DTthe defense447NNdefense said448VVDsay ...449:... [JUSTICE ALITO]450LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] ...451:... I452PPI 'll453MDwill ask454VVask ...455:... [JUSTICE GINSBURG]456LOC[JUSTICE GINSBURG] Counsel457NPCounsel ...458:... counsel459NNcounsel argued460VVNargue for461INfor the462DTthe preferred463JJpreferred ...464:... the465DTthe defendant466NNdefendant 's467POS's preferred468JJpreferred sentence469NNsentence .470SENT. did471VVDdo n't472RBn't say473VVsay that474IN/thatthat anything475NNanything other476JJother than477INthan that478WDTthat would479MDwould be480VBbe excessive481JJexcessive .482SENT. [MS. TURNER]483LOC[MS. TURNER] That484DTthat 's485VBZbe correct486JJcorrect ,487,, Justice488NPJustice Ginsburg489NPGinsburg .490SENT. And491CCand that492DTthat is493VBZbe fine494JJfine to495TOto put496VVput the497DTthe court498NNcourt on499INon notice500NNnotice of501INof his502PP$his claim503NNclaim that504IN/thatthat his505PP$his sentence506NNsentence is507VBZbe too508RBtoo long509JJlong .510SENT. And511CCand there512EXthere are513VBPbe sort514NNsort of515INof two516CDtwo parts517NNSpart to518TOto my519PP$my answer520NNanswer .521SENT. The522DTthe first523JJfirst is524VBZbe that525IN/thatthat the526DTthe better527JJRgood reading528NNreading of529INof Section530NPSection 3553531CD@card@ (532(( a533DTa )534)) is535VBZbe that536IN/thatthat the537DTthe district538NNdistrict court539NNcourt 's540POS's task541NNtask is542VBZbe to543TOto identify544VVidentify the545DTthe particular546JJparticular sentence547NNsentence that548WDTthat is549VBZbe sufficient550JJsufficient but551CCbut not552RBnot greater553JJRgreat than554INthan necessary555JJnecessary to556TOto serve557VVserve the558DTthe statute559NNstatute 's560POS's objectives561NNSobjective .562SENT. And563CCand "564``" sufficient565JJsufficient but566CCbut not567RBnot greater568JJRgreat than569INthan necessary570JJnecessary "571``" necessarily572RBnecessarily means573VVZmean that574IN/thatthat there575EXthere is576VBZbe a577DTa sentence578NNsentence that579WDTthat is580VBZbe sufficient581JJsufficient but582CCbut not583RBnot greater584JJRgreat than585INthan necessary586JJnecessary .587SENT. If588INif one589CDone ...590:... if591INif 10592CD@card@ months593NNSmonth is594VBZbe sufficient595JJsufficient ,596,, 15597CD@card@ months598NNSmonth is599VBZbe obviously600RBobviously greater601JJRgreat .602SENT. So603RBso ,604,, by605INby asking606VVGask the607DTthe court608NNcourt for609INfor a610DTa particular611JJparticular sentence612NNsentence ,613,, the614DTthe party615NNparty puts616VVZput the617DTthe district618NNdistrict court619NNcourt on620INon notice621NNnotice of622INof their623PP$their objections624NNSobjection to625TOto any626DTany other627JJother sentence628NNsentence .629SENT. But630CCbut even631RBeven if632INif you633PPyou do634VVPdo n't635RBn't agree636VVagree with637INwith that638DTthat reading639NNreading of640INof Section641NPSection 3553642CD@card@ (643(( a644DTa )645)) ,646,, there647EXthere is648VBZbe no649DTno need650NNneed to651TOto inform652VVinform the653DTthe court654NNcourt of655INof all656DTall possible657JJpossible actions658NNSaction it659PPit might660MDmight take661VVtake .662SENT. There663EXthere 's664VBZbe no665DTno ...666:... there667EXthere 's668VBZbe no669DTno basis670NNbasis for671INfor that672DTthat requirement673NNrequirement in674INin Rule675NPRule 51676CD@card@ and677CCand in678INin other679JJother areas680NNSarea of681INof the682DTthe law683NNlaw where684WRBwhere there685EXthere are686VBPbe ...687:... or688CCor a689DTa district690NNdistrict court691NNcourt can692MDcan take693VVtake a694DTa range695NNrange of696INof actions697NNSaction .698SENT. For699INfor example700NNexample ,701,, in702INin the703DTthe context704NNcontext of705INof Rule706NPRule 11707CD@card@ sanctions708NNSsanction or709CCor a710DTa length711NNlength of712INof continuance713NNcontinuance or714CCor reasonable715JJreasonable attorneys716NNSattorney '717POS' fees718NNSfee ,719,, a720DTa party721NNparty simply722RBsimply has723VHZhave to724TOto ask725VVask for726INfor the727DTthe result728NNresult it729PPit wants730VVZwant .731SENT. It732PPit does733VVZdo n't734RBn't have735VHhave to736TOto identify737VVidentify all738DTall possible739JJpossible actions740NNSaction the741DTthe district742NNdistrict court743NNcourt might744MDmight take745VVtake to746TOto preserve747VVpreserve that748DTthat claim749NNclaim for750INfor appeal751NNappeal .752SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]753LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] But754CCbut ,755,, I756PPI mean757VVPmean ,758,, let759VVlet 's760VBZbe say761VVsay the762DTthe ...763:... the764DTthe defendant765NNdefendant says766VVZsay I767PPI think768VVPthink my769PP$my sentence770NNsentence should771MDshould be772VBbe ,773,, you774PPyou know775VVPknow ,776,, two777CDtwo years778NNSyear ,779,, and780CCand the781DTthe district782NNdistrict court783NNcourt says784VVZsay in785INin its786PP$its decision787NNdecision :788:: Well789UHwell ,790,, I791PPI think792VVPthink I793PPI 'm794VBPbe going795VVGgo to796TOto sentence797VVsentence you798PPyou to799TOto two800CDtwo years801NNSyear and802CCand six803CDsix months804NNSmonth because805INbecause I806PPI think807VVPthink you808PPyou 've809VHPhave ,810,, you811PPyou know812VVPknow ,813,, misunderstood814VVDmisunderstand this815DTthis particular816JJparticular provision817NNprovision about818RBabout ,819,, you820PPyou know821VVPknow ,822,, history823NNhistory or824CCor deterrence825NNdeterrence or826CCor ...827:... or828CCor whichever829WDTwhichever .830SENT. And831CCand is832VBZbe the833DTthe district834NNdistrict court835NNcourt supposed836VVNsuppose to837TOto appreciate838VVappreciate ,839,, and840CCand the841DTthe court842NNcourt of843INof appeals844NNSappeal ,845,, if846INif the847DTthe defendant848NNdefendant does849VVZdo nothing850NNnothing else851RBelse ,852,, that853IN/thatthat he854PPhe thinks855VVZthink it856PPit 's857VBZbe substantively858RBsubstantively unreasonable859JJunreasonable for860INfor the861DTthe district862NNdistrict court863NNcourt to864TOto have865VHhave added866VVNadd those867DTthose six868CDsix months869NNSmonth ,870,, for871INfor a872DTa reason873NNreason that874IN/thatthat the875DTthe ...876:... may877MDmay not878RBnot even879RBeven have880VHhave been881VBNbe addressed882VVNaddress by883INby the884DTthe defendant885NNdefendant in886INin his887PP$his submission888NNsubmission ?889SENT? [MS. TURNER]890LOC[MS. TURNER] So891INso two892CDtwo points893NNSpoint ,894,, Your895PP$your Honor896NPHonor .897SENT. The898DTthe first899JJfirst is900VBZbe that901IN/thatthat ,902,, you903PPyou know904VVPknow ,905,, the906DTthe district907NNdistrict court908NNcourt does909VVZdo n't910RBn't really911RBreally have912VHhave to913TOto appreciate914VVappreciate that915IN/thatthat it916PPit is917VBZbe substantively918RBsubstantively unreasonable919JJunreasonable because920INbecause ,921,, again922RBagain ,923,, that924WDTthat 's925VBZbe just926RBjust the927DTthe appellate928JJappellate standard929NNstandard of930INof review931NNreview .932SENT. The933DTthe district934NNdistrict court935NNcourt just936RBjust has937VHZhave to938TOto understand939VVunderstand that940IN/thatthat the941DTthe party942NNparty objects943NNSobject to944TOto the945DTthe particular946JJparticular sentence947NNsentence .948SENT. But949CCbut also950RBalso ...951:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]952LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well953UHWell ,954,, but955CCbut ...956:... but957CCbut I958PPI do959VVPdo n't960RBn't know961VVknow how962WRBhow the963DTthe district964NNdistrict court965NNcourt knows966VVZknow that967IN/thatthat if968INif you969PPyou do970VVPdo n't971RBn't require972VVrequire an973DTan objection974NNobjection after975INafter the976DTthe district977NNdistrict court978NNcourt has979VHZhave explained980VVNexplain why981WRBwhy he982PPhe 's983VBZbe adding984VVGadd the985DTthe six986CDsix months987NNSmonth .988SENT. As989RBas far990RBfar as991INas he992PPhe knows993VVZknow ,994,, well995RBwell ,996,, maybe997RBmaybe that998DTthat 's999VBZbe okay1000JJokay with1001INwith the1002DTthe defendant1003NNdefendant ;1004:; he1005PPhe wanted1006VVDwant two1007CDtwo years1008NNSyear ,1009,, but1010CCbut he1011PPhe can1012MDcan 't1013RB't really1014RBreally say1015VVsay that1016IN/thatthat it1017PPit 's1018VBZbe unreasonable1019JJunreasonable to1020TOto get1021VVget two1022CDtwo years1023NNSyear and1024CCand six1025CDsix months1026NNSmonth .1027SENT. Particularly1028RBparticularly since1029INsince I1030PPI pointed1031VVDpoint out1032RPout to1033TOto him1034PPhim precisely1035RBprecisely why1036WRBwhy I1037PPI 'm1038VBPbe adding1039VVGadd those1040DTthose six1041CDsix months1042NNSmonth .1043SENT. [MS. TURNER]1044LOC[MS. TURNER] So1045RBso ,1046,, again1047RBagain ,1048,, we1049PPwe think1050VVPthink the1051DTthe better1052JJRgood view1053NNview of1054INof Section1055NPSection 35531056CD@card@ (1057(( a1058DTa )1059)) is1060VBZbe that1061IN/thatthat it1062PPit really1063RBreally instructs1064VVZinstruct the1065DTthe district1066NNdistrict court1067NNcourt to1068TOto identify1069VVidentify a1070DTa particular1071JJparticular sentence1072NNsentence ,1073,, and1074CCand so1075RBso ,1076,, by1077INby identifying1078VVGidentify a1079DTa particular1080JJparticular sentence1081NNsentence ,1082,, the1083DTthe defendant1084NNdefendant necessarily1085RBnecessarily communicates1086VVZcommunicate that1087IN/thatthat other1088JJother sentences1089NNSsentence ...1090:... that1091IN/thatthat he1092PPhe does1093VVZdo n't1094RBn't agree1095VVagree with1096INwith other1097JJother sentences1098NNSsentence .1099SENT. And1100CCand while1101INwhile it1102PPit 's1103VBZbe true1104JJtrue that1105IN/thatthat a1106DTa defendant1107NNdefendant might1108MDmight not1109RBnot have1110VHhave identified1111VVNidentify every1112DTevery factor1113NNfactor in1114INin Section1115NPSection 35531116CD@card@ (1117(( a1118DTa )1119)) in1120INin requesting1121VVGrequest a1122DTa particular1123JJparticular sentence1124NNsentence ...1125:... you1126PPyou know1127VVPknow ,1128,, there1129EXthere are1130VBPbe only1131RBonly five1132CDfive ,1133,, I1134PPI think1135VVPthink ...1136:... and1137CCand district1138NNdistrict courts1139NNScourt and1140CCand defense1141NNdefense attorneys1142NNSattorney are1143VBPbe familiar1144JJfamiliar with1145INwith those1146DTthose factors1147NNSfactor and1148CCand there1149EXthere 's1150VBZbe no1151DTno need1152NNneed to1153TOto specifically1154RBspecifically run1155VVrun through1156INthrough them1157PPthem .1158SENT. 21159CD2 Similarly1160RBsimilarly ,1161,, in1162INin other1163JJother contexts1164NNScontext ,1165,, other1166JJother areas1167NNSarea of1168INof the1169DTthe law1170NNlaw ,1171,, there1172EXthere 's1173VBZbe no1174DTno need1175NNneed to1176TOto ...1177:... for1178INfor ...1179:... to1180TOto ...1181:... example1182NNexample ,1183,, when1184WRBwhen someone1185NNsomeone ...1186:... when1187WRBwhen a1188DTa district1189NNdistrict court1190NNcourt makes1191VVZmake a1192DTa evidentiary1193JJevidentiary ruling1194NNruling that1195IN/thatthat a1196DTa party1197NNparty disagrees1198VVZdisagree with1199INwith ,1200,, the1201DTthe party1202NNparty does1203VVZdo n't1204RBn't have1205VHhave to1206TOto say1207VVsay this1208DTthis is1209VBZbe an1210DTan abuse1211NNabuse of1212INof discretion1213NNdiscretion ,1214,, even1215RBeven if1216INif the1217DTthe district1218NNdistrict court1219NNcourt identifies1220VVZidentify reasons1221NNSreason ...1222:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1223LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Yeah1224NPYeah ,1225,, but1226CCbut ,1227,, I1228PPI mean1229VVPmean ,1230,, it1231PPit could1232MDcould end1233VVend up1234RPup to1235TOto particularly1236RBparticularly odd1237JJodd results1238NNSresult .1239SENT. I1240PPI mean1241VVPmean ,1242,, without1243INwithout a1244DTa particular1245JJparticular objection1246NNobjection ,1247,, the1248DTthe district1249NNdistrict judge1250NNjudge might1251MDmight ,1252,, you1253PPyou know1254VVPknow ,1255,, be1256VBbe sitting1257VVGsit there1258RBthere in1259INin the1260DTthe court1261NNcourt of1262INof appeals1263NNSappeal and1264CCand the1265DTthe brief1266NNbrief that1267WDTthat is1268VBZbe filed1269VVNfile is1270VBZbe ,1271,, you1272PPyou know1273VVPknow ,1274,, 401275CD@card@ pages1276NNSpage objecting1277VVGobject to1278TOto ,1279,, you1280PPyou know1281VVPknow ,1282,, a1283DTa particular1284JJparticular provision1285NNprovision .1286SENT. And1287CCand the1288DTthe district1289NNdistrict court1290NNcourt says1291VVZsay :1292:: Well1293UHwell ,1294,, that1295WDTthat 's1296VBZbe not1297RBnot what1298WPwhat I1299PPI was1300VBDbe looking1301VVGlook at1302INat at1303INat all1304DTall .1305SENT. I1306PPI was1307VBDbe looking1308VVGlook at1309INat something1310NNsomething else1311RBelse .1312SENT. [MS. TURNER]1313LOC[MS. TURNER] In1314INin this1315DTthis ...1316:... in1317INin this1318DTthis hypothetical1319JJhypothetical ,1320,, the1321DTthe party1322NNparty is1323VBZbe raising1324VVGraise different1325JJdifferent arguments1326NNSargument on1327INon appeal1328NNappeal ,1329,, is1330VBZbe that1331DTthat ...1332:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1333LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well1334UHWell ,1335,, the1336DTthe whole1337JJwhole point1338NNpoint ,1339,, I1340PPI ...1341:... I1342PPI guess1343VVPguess ,1344,, of1345INof a1346DTa post-decision1347NNpost-decision objection1348NNobjection ...1349:... [MS. TURNER]1350LOC[MS. TURNER] Yes1351NPYes .1352SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]1353LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] ...1354:... is1355VBZbe that1356IN/thatthat it1357PPit puts1358VVZput people1359NNSpeople on1360INon notice1361NNnotice as1362INas to1363TOto what1364WPwhat the1365DTthe defendant1366NNdefendant is1367VBZbe objecting1368VVGobject to1369TOto .1370SENT. And1371CCand that1372WDTthat can1373MDcan shape1374VVshape ,1375,, you1376PPyou know1377VVPknow ,1378,, whether1379INwhether it1380PPit 's1381POS's subsequent1382JJsubsequent proceedings1383NNSproceeding in1384INin the1385DTthe district1386NNdistrict court1387NNcourt or1388CCor appellate1389JJappellate review1390NNreview ,1391,, when1392WRBwhen ,1393,, instead1394RBinstead ,1395,, if1396INif you1397PPyou just1398RBjust say1399VVPsay ,1400,, well1401RBwell ,1402,, so1403RBso long1404RBlong as1405INas it1406PPit 's1407VBZbe more1408JJRmore than1409INthan the1410DTthe defendant1411NNdefendant asked1412VVDask for1413INfor ,1414,, in1415INin a1416DTa regime1417NNregime where1418WRBwhere there1419EXthere are1420VBPbe a1421DTa lot1422NNlot of1423INof factors1424NNSfactor ...1425:... I1426PPI 'd1427MDwould count1428VVcount more1429JJRmore than1430INthan five1431CDfive despite1432INdespite the1433DTthe subsections1434NNSsubsection ...1435:... it1436PPit 's1437VBZbe particularly1438RBparticularly helpful1439JJhelpful to1440TOto the1441DTthe process1442NNprocess that1443IN/thatthat people1444NNSpeople know1445VVPknow what1446WPwhat the1447DTthe concern1448NNconcern really1449RBreally is1450VBZbe going1451VVGgo forward1452RBforward .1453SENT. [MS. TURNER]1454LOC[MS. TURNER] But1455CCbut ,1456,, again1457RBagain ,1458,, that1459WDTthat is1460VBZbe just1461RBjust the1462DTthe appellate1463JJappellate standard1464NNstandard of1465INof review1466NNreview .1467SENT. And1468CCand Rule1469NPRule 511470CD@card@ is1471VBZbe explicit1472JJexplicit in1473INin saying1474VVGsay that1475IN/thatthat post-ruling1476NNpost-ruling objections1477NNSobjection are1478VBPbe not1479RBnot required1480VVNrequire if1481INif you1482PPyou have1483VHPhave already1484RBalready informed1485VVNinform the1486DTthe court1487NNcourt of1488INof the1489DTthe action1490NNaction that1491IN/thatthat you1492PPyou wish1493VVPwish it1494PPit to1495TOto take1496VVtake .1497SENT. And1498CCand there1499EXthere 's1500VBZbe no1501DTno reason1502NNreason to1503TOto ...1504:... to1505TOto alter1506VValter that1507DTthat approach1508NNapproach in1509INin the1510DTthe sentencing1511NNsentencing context1512NNcontext .1513SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]1514LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Do1515VVPdo you1516PPyou think1517VVPthink that1518IN/thatthat under1519INunder the1520DTthe so-called1521JJso-called parsimony1522NNparsimony principle1523NNprinciple ,1524,, there1525EXthere is1526VBZbe one1527CDone precise1528JJprecise sentence1529NNsentence in1530INin every1531DTevery case1532NNcase that1533WDTthat serves1534VVZserve all1535PDTall the1536DTthe interests1537NNSinterest of1538INof sentencing1539NNsentencing but1540CCbut does1541VVZdo n't1542RBn't do1543VVdo so1544RBso to1545TOto an1546DTan excessive1547JJexcessive extent1548NNextent ?1549SENT? [MS. TURNER]1550LOC[MS. TURNER] That1551DTthat is1552VBZbe the1553DTthe district1554NNdistrict court1555NNcourt 's1556POS's task1557NNtask ,1558,, is1559VBZbe to1560TOto find1561VVfind the1562DTthe sentence1563NNsentence the1564DTthe district1565NNdistrict court1566NNcourt determines1567VVZdetermine is1568VBZbe sufficient1569JJsufficient but1570CCbut not1571RBnot ...1572:... [JUSTICE ALITO]1573LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] And1574CCand there1575EXthere 's1576VBZbe just1577RBjust one1578CDone .1579SENT. So1580RBso it1581PPit 's1582VBZbe ...1583:... let1584VVlet 's1585VBZbe say1586VVsay it1587PPit 's1588POS's 111589CD@card@ months1590NNSmonth ,1591,, that1592WDTthat is1593VBZbe the1594DTthe ...1595:... that1596WDTthat is1597VBZbe the1598DTthe sentence1599NNsentence called1600VVNcall for1601INfor by1602INby the1603DTthe Sentencing1604NNsentencing Reform1605NPReform Act1606NPAct ,1607,, not1608RBnot 101609CD@card@ ,1610,, not1611RBnot 121612CD@card@ .1613SENT. Eleven1614NNeleven .1615SENT. [MS. TURNER]1616LOC[MS. TURNER] So1617INso it1618PPit 's1619VBZbe not1620RBnot that1621IN/thatthat there1622EXthere is1623VBZbe some1624DTsome Platonically1625RBPlatonically correct1626JJcorrect sentence1627NNsentence .1628SENT. But1629CCbut the1630DTthe district1631NNdistrict court1632NNcourt 's1633POS's task1634NNtask is1635VBZbe to1636TOto determine1637VVdetermine the1638DTthe sentence1639NNsentence that1640IN/thatthat ,1641,, in1642INin its1643PP$its view1644NNview ,1645,, is1646VBZbe sufficient1647JJsufficient but1648CCbut not1649RBnot greater1650JJRgreat than1651INthan necessary1652JJnecessary .1653SENT. And1654CCand that1655DTthat 's1656VBZbe ,1657,, you1658PPyou know1659VVPknow ,1660,, inherent1661JJinherent in1662INin sort1663NNsort of1664INof this1665DTthis parsimony1666NNparsimony principle1667NNprinciple .1668SENT. I1669PPI mean1670VVPmean ,1671,, that1672WDTthat 's1673VBZbe what1674WPwhat that1675DTthat language1676NNlanguage means1677VVZmean .1678SENT. If1679INif 101680CD@card@ months1681NNSmonth is1682VBZbe sufficient1683JJsufficient but1684CCbut not1685RBnot greater1686JJRgreat than1687INthan necessary1688JJnecessary ,1689,, 101690CD@card@ months1691NNSmonth and1692CCand one1693CDone day1694NNday is1695VBZbe greater1696JJRgreat than1697INthan necessary1698JJnecessary .1699SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]1700LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] Well1701UHWell ,1702,, if1703INif that1704DTthat ...1705:... if1706INif it1707PPit is1708VBZbe not1709RBnot the1710DTthe case1711NNcase that1712IN/thatthat there1713RBthere ...1714:... the1715DTthe parsimony1716NNparsimony principle1717NNprinciple identifies1718VVZidentify one1719CDone particular1720JJparticular ,1721,, precise1722JJprecise sentence1723NNsentence that1724WDTthat is1725VBZbe the1726DTthe correct1727JJcorrect sentence1728NNsentence ,1729,, then1730RBthen saying1731VVGsay ...1732:... then1733RBthen for1734INfor defense1735NNdefense counsel1736NNcounsel to1737TOto say1738VVsay 111739CD@card@ ...1740:... I1741PPI ...1742:... I1743PPI ...1744:... I1745PPI urge1746VVPurge you1747PPyou to1748TOto sentence1749VVsentence my1750PP$my client1751NNclient to1752TOto no1753RBno more1754JJRmore than1755INthan 111756CD@card@ months1757NNSmonth ,1758,, that1759WDTthat 's1760VBZbe different1761JJdifferent from1762INfrom saying1763VVGsay that1764IN/thatthat a1765DTa ...1766:... a1767DTa sentence1768NNsentence of1769INof 121770CD@card@ months1771NNSmonth would1772MDwould be1773VBbe outside1774INoutside the1775DTthe range1776NNrange of1777INof reasonableness1778NNreasonableness ...1779:... [MS. TURNER]1780LOC[MS. TURNER] Again1781NPAgain ,1782,, Your1783PP$your Honor1784NPHonor ,1785,, it1786PPit ...1787:... [JUSTICE ALITO]1788LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] ...1789:... which1790WDTwhich is1791VBZbe what1792WPwhat would1793MDwould have1794VHhave to1795TOto be1796VBbe shown1797VVNshow on1798INon appeal1799NNappeal .1800SENT. [MS. TURNER]1801LOC[MS. TURNER] ...1802:... it1803PPit ...1804:... you1805PPyou know1806VVPknow ,1807,, it1808PPit is1809VBZbe sort1810NNsort of1811INof a1812DTa different1813JJdifferent argument1814NNargument on1815INon appeal1816NNappeal ,1817,, but1818CCbut it1819PPit is1820VBZbe no1821RBno different1822JJdifferent than1823INthan ,1824,, again1825RBagain ,1826,, if1827INif you1828PPyou were1829VBDbe on1830INon appeal1831NNappeal and1832CCand you1833PPyou had1834VHDhave to1835TOto argue1836VVargue that1837IN/thatthat the1838DTthe district1839NNdistrict court1840NNcourt 's1841POS's ruling1842NNruling was1843VBDbe an1844DTan abuse1845NNabuse of1846INof discretion1847NNdiscretion ,1848,, you1849PPyou ...1850:... you1851PPyou do1852VVPdo n't1853RBn't have1854VHhave to1855TOto make1856VVmake that1857DTthat abuse1858NNabuse of1859INof discretion1860NNdiscretion argument1861NNargument in1862INin district1863NNdistrict court1864NNcourt ,1865,, even1866RBeven though1867INthough that1868DTthat is1869VBZbe how1870WRBhow you1871PPyou would1872MDwould have1873VHhave to1874TOto frame1875VVframe your1876PP$your argument1877NNargument on1878INon appeal1879NNappeal .1880SENT. It1881PPit 's1882VBZbe exactly1883RBexactly the1884DTthe same1885JJsame here1886RBhere .1887SENT. And1888CCand we1889PPwe 're1890VBPbe just1891RBjust asking1892VVGask for1893INfor those1894DTthose same1895JJsame rules1896NNSrule to1897TOto apply1898VVapply in1899INin this1900DTthis context1901NNcontext .1902SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]1903LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] What1904WPWhat if1905INif ...1906:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]1907LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Ms1908NNMs .1909SENT. Kendall1910NPKendall ...1911:... I1912PPI 'm1913VBPbe sorry1914JJsorry .1915SENT. [JUSTICE ALITO]1916LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] What1917WPWhat if1918INif defense1919NNdefense ...1920:... just1921RBjust along1922INalong the1923DTthe same1924JJsame lines1925NNSline very1926RBvery quickly1927RBquickly .1928SENT. What1929WPWhat if1930INif defense1931NNdefense counsel1932NNcounsel says1933VVZsay ,1934,, look1935VVlook ,1936,, I1937PPI understand1938VVPunderstand that1939IN/thatthat the1940DTthe ...1941:... the1942DTthe guidelines1943NNSguideline range1944NNrange is1945VBZbe to1946TOto 121947CD@card@ months1948NNSmonth and1949CCand I1950PPI ...1951:... and1952CCand I1953PPI know1954VVPknow that1955IN/thatthat that1956DTthat 's1957VBZbe presumptively1958RBpresumptively reasonable1959JJreasonable and1960CCand I1961PPI 'm1962VBPbe not1963RBnot going1964VVGgo to1965TOto argue1966VVargue with1967INwith that1968DTthat ,1969,, but1970CCbut I1971PPI urge1972VVPurge you1973PPyou to1974TOto sentence1975VVsentence my1976PP$my client1977NNclient to1978TOto no1979RBno more1980JJRmore than1981INthan 101982CD@card@ .1983SENT. And1984CCand the1985DTthe judge1986NNjudge says1987VVZsay ,1988,, well1989RBwell ,1990,, I1991PPI 'm1992VBPbe sorry1993JJsorry ,1994,, I1995PPI 'm1996VBPbe going1997VVGgo to1998TOto choose1999VVchoose 112000CD@card@ .2001SENT. Can2002MDcan the2003DTthe defense2004NNdefense counsel2005NNcounsel then2006RBthen argue2007VVPargue on2008INon appeal2009NNappeal 112010CD@card@ was2011VBDbe unreasonable2012JJunreasonable ?2013SENT? [MS. TURNER]2014LOC[MS. TURNER] If2015INif the2016DTthe defense2017NNdefense counsel2018NNcounsel has2019VHZhave said2020VVNsay ...2021:... has2022VHZhave said2023VVNsay that2024IN/thatthat 102025CD@card@ to2026TOto 122027CD@card@ would2028MDwould be2029VBbe acceptable2030JJacceptable or2031CCor if2032INif he2033PPhe 's2034VBZbe only2035RBonly asked2036VVNask for2037INfor 102038CD@card@ ?2039SENT? [JUSTICE ALITO]2040LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] He2041PPhe says2042VVZsay ,2043,, I2044PPI understand2045VVPunderstand that2046DTthat 's2047VBZbe the2048DTthe range2049NNrange and2050CCand that2051DTthat 's2052VBZbe a2053DTa reasonable2054JJreasonable range2055NNrange ,2056,, but2057CCbut I2058PPI think2059VVPthink the2060DTthe appropriate2061JJappropriate sentence2062NNsentence here2063RBhere is2064VBZbe 102065CD@card@ .2066SENT. [MS. TURNER]2067LOC[MS. TURNER] So2068RBso ,2069,, if2070INif ...2071:... if2072INif the2073DTthe defense2074NNdefense counsel2075NNcounsel simply2076RBsimply identified2077VVDidentify the2078DTthe guidelines2079NNSguideline range2080NNrange and2081CCand then2082RBthen asked2083VVNask for2084INfor a2085DTa particular2086JJparticular sentence2087NNsentence ,2088,, then2089RBthen ,2090,, yes2091UHyes ,2092,, I2093PPI think2094VVPthink that2095IN/thatthat defense2096NNdefense counsel2097NNcounsel could2098MDcould argue2099VVargue on2100INon appeal2101NNappeal that2102IN/thatthat 112103CD@card@ months2104NNSmonth was2105VBDbe substantively2106RBsubstantively unreasonable2107JJunreasonable .2108SENT. However2109RBhowever ,2110,, if2111INif a2112DTa district2113NNdistrict court2114NNcourt ...2115:... or2116CCor if2117INif a2118DTa defense2119NNdefense counsel2120NNcounsel said2121VVDsay something2122NNsomething like2123INlike ,2124,, anything2125NNanything in2126INin the2127DTthe 102128CD@card@ to2129TOto 122130CD@card@ months2131NNSmonth range2132NNrange is2133VBZbe fine2134JJfine with2135INwith us2136PPus and2137CCand we2138PPwe think2139VVPthink that2140WDTthat 's2141VBZbe ...2142:... you2143PPyou can2144MDcan do2145VVdo that2146IN/thatthat ,2147,, in2148INin that2149DTthat case2150NNcase ,2151,, arguably2152RBarguably ,2153,, he2154PPhe has2155VHZhave not2156RBnot preserved2157VVNpreserve an2158DTan objection2159NNobjection to2160TOto an2161DTan 11-month2162JJ11-month sentence2163NNsentence ,2164,, but2165CCbut it2166PPit ...2167:... you2168PPyou know2169VVPknow ,2170,, it2171PPit would2172MDwould depend2173VVdepend on2174INon the2175DTthe context2176NNcontext of2177INof what2178WPwhat exactly2179RBexactly defense2180NNdefense counsel2181NNcounsel had2182VHDhave said2183VVNsay .2184SENT. And2185CCand there2186EXthere 's2187VBZbe no2188DTno reason2189NNreason to2190TOto craft2191VVcraft unique2192JJunique rules2193NNSrule in2194INin this2195DTthis context2196NNcontext .2197SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2198LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Ms2199NNMs .2200SENT. Kendall2201NPKendall ,2202,, the2203DTthe amici2204NNamici seems2205VVZseem in2206INin my2207PP$my mind2208NNmind to2209TOto be2210VBbe arguing2211VVGargue not2212RBnot differently2213RBdifferently than2214INthan you2215PPyou are2216VBPbe ,2217,, that2218IN/thatthat you2219PPyou do2220VVPdo n't2221RBn't need2222VVneed to2223TOto make2224VVmake necessarily2225RBnecessarily an2226DTan objection2227NNobjection after2228INafter the2229DTthe fact2230NNfact in2231INin all2232DTall circumstances2233NNScircumstance .2234SENT. He2235PPhe seems2236VVZseem to2237TOto be2238VBbe arguing2239VVGargue that2240IN/thatthat the2241DTthe circumstances2242NNScircumstance ,2243,, though2244RBthough ,2245,, in2246INin which2247WDTwhich you2248PPyou do2249VVPdo n't2250RBn't have2251VHhave to2252TOto renew2253VVrenew afterward2254RBafterward are2255VBPbe those2256DTthose where2257WRBwhere you2258PPyou lay2259VVDlie forth2260RBforth the2261DTthe reasons2262NNSreason for2263INfor why2264WRBwhy you2265PPyou want2266VVPwant something2267NNsomething ,2268,, and2269CCand so2270RBso that2271IN/thatthat you2272PPyou merely2273RBmerely saying2274VVGsay ,2275,, I2276PPI think2277VVPthink 102278CD@card@ months2279NNSmonth is2280VBZbe enough2281JJenough is2282VBZbe not2283RBnot enough2284RBenough ,2285,, that2286IN/thatthat that2287WDTthat does2288VVZdo n't2289RBn't put2290VVput the2291DTthe district2292NNdistrict court2293NNcourt on2294INon notice2295NNnotice of2296INof the2297DTthe reasons2298NNSreason you2299PPyou think2300VVPthink 102301CD@card@ months2302NNSmonth are2303VBPbe enough2304JJenough .2305SENT. And2306CCand so2307RBso that2308IN/thatthat he2309PPhe 's2310VBZbe basically2311RBbasically ,2312,, I2313PPI think2314VVPthink ,2315,, he2316PPhe 'll2317MDwill speak2318VVspeak for2319INfor himself2320PPhimself ,2321,, obviously2322RBobviously ,2323,, but2324CCbut assuming2325VVGassume his2326PP$his argument2327NNargument in2328INin my2329PP$my question2330NNquestion ,2331,, that2332WDTthat you2333PPyou need2334VVPneed to2335TOto put2336VVput the2337DTthe district2338NNdistrict court2339NNcourt on2340INon some2341DTsome sort2342NNsort of2343INof notice2344NNnotice what2345WPwhat the2346DTthe basis2347NNbasis is2348VBZbe for2349INfor you2350PPyou believing2351VVGbelieve that2352IN/thatthat 102353CD@card@ or2354CCor or2355CCor 112356CD@card@ months2357NNSmonth is2358VBZbe the2359DTthe right2360JJright number2361NNnumber ,2362,, and2363CCand that2364IN/thatthat if2365INif you2366PPyou do2367VVPdo n't2368RBn't do2369VVdo that2370IN/thatthat ,2371,, then2372RBthen you2373PPyou do2374VVPdo need2375NNneed to2376TOto ...2377:... you2378PPyou have2379VHPhave n't2380RBn't preserved2381VVNpreserve your2382PP$your objection2383NNobjection adequately2384RBadequately .2385SENT. How2386WRBHow do2387VVPdo you2388PPyou address2389VVaddress that2390DTthat argument2391NNargument ?2392SENT? [MS. TURNER]2393LOC[MS. TURNER] So2394RBso ,2395,, as2396INas a2397DTa ...2398:... just2399RBjust as2400INas a2401DTa first2402JJfirst point2403NNpoint and2404CCand a2405DTa practical2406JJpractical matter2407NNmatter ,2408,, it2409PPit is2410VBZbe vanishingly2411RBvanishingly rare2412JJrare that2413IN/thatthat a2414DTa defense2415NNdefense attorney2416NNattorney will2417MDwill have2418VHhave not2419RBnot filed2420VVNfile objections2421NNSobjection to2422TOto the2423DTthe PSR2424NNPSR and2425CCand will2426MDwill simply2427RBsimply stand2428VVstand up2429RPup and2430CCand say2431VVsay ,2432,, Section2433NPSection 35532434CD@card@ (2435(( a2436DTa )2437)) requires2438VVZrequire a2439DTa shorter2440JJRshort sentence2441NNsentence and2442CCand sit2443VVsit down2444RPdown .2445SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2446LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I2447PPI ...2448:... I2449PPI agree2450VVPagree with2451INwith you2452PPyou .2453SENT. It2454PPit ...2455:... it2456PPit never2457RBnever happened2458VVDhappen in2459INin my2460PP$my experience2461NNexperience ,2462,, but2463CCbut it2464PPit does2465VVZdo n't2466RBn't mean2467VVmean it2468PPit can2469MDcan 't2470RB't .2471SENT. And2472CCand so2473RBso the2474DTthe question2475NNquestion is2476VBZbe for2477INfor a2478DTa reviewing2479VVGreview court2480NNcourt ,2481,, when2482WRBwhen it2483PPit gets2484VVZget that2485DTthat situation2486NNsituation ,2487,, what2488WPwhat is2489VBZbe it2490PPit looking2491VVGlook at2492INat ...2493:... [MS. TURNER]2494LOC[MS. TURNER] So2495RBso ...2496:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]2497LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] ...2498:... to2499TOto make2500VVmake a2501DTa judgment2502NNjudgment as2503INas to2504TOto whether2505INwhether or2506CCor not2507RBnot the2508DTthe objection2509NNobjection was2510VBDbe adequately2511RBadequately preserved2512VVNpreserve when2513WRBwhen it2514PPit was2515VBDbe n't2516RBn't restated2517VVNrestate at2518INat the2519DTthe end2520NNend ?2521SENT? I2522PPI 'm2523VBPbe sorry2524JJsorry .2525SENT. [MS. TURNER]2526LOC[MS. TURNER] Thank2527VVthank you2528PPyou .2529SENT. The2530DTthe Court2531NPCourt 's2532VBZbe simply2533RBsimply applying2534VVGapply the2535DTthe same2536JJsame fair2537JJfair notice2538NNnotice standard2539NNstandard that2540IN/thatthat it2541PPit applies2542VVZapply in2543INin every2544DTevery other2545JJother context2546NNcontext to2547TOto determine2548VVdetermine whether2549INwhether a2550DTa factual2551JJfactual ...2552:... an2553DTan argument2554NNargument is2555VBZbe preserved2556VVNpreserve .2557SENT. It2558PPit 's2559VBZbe the2560DTthe test2561NNtest that2562IN/thatthat this2563DTthis Court2564NPCourt laid2565VVDlay out2566RPout in2567INin Beech2568NPBeech Aircraft2569NPAircraft .2570SENT. And2571CCand anything2572RBanything more2573RBRmore specific2574JJspecific ,2575,, requiring2576VVGrequire very2577RBvery specific2578JJspecific facts2579NNSfact and2580CCand circumstances2581NNScircumstance ,2582,, as2583INas amicus2584NNamicus tends2585VVZtend to2586TOto suggest2587VVsuggest ,2588,, is2589VBZbe unwise2590JJunwise because2591INbecause it2592PPit would2593MDwould create2594VVcreate new2595JJnew problems2596NNSproblem for2597INfor this2598DTthis Court2599NPCourt to2600TOto resolve2601VVresolve ,2602,, such2603JJsuch as2604INas if2605INif someone2606NNsomeone argued2607VVNargue in2608INin district2609NNdistrict court2610NNcourt that2611IN/thatthat his2612PP$his client2613NNclient was2614VBDbe sick2615JJsick and2616CCand deserved2617VVDdeserve a2618DTa shorter2619JJRshort sentence2620NNsentence and2621CCand then2622RBthen argued2623VVDargue on2624INon appeal2625NNappeal that2626IN/thatthat he2627PPhe was2628VBDbe going2629VVGgo to2630TOto die2631VVdie and2632CCand deserved2633VVDdeserve a2634DTa shorter2635JJRshort sentence2636NNsentence ,2637,, the2638DTthe Court2639NPCourt would2640MDwould have2641VHhave to2642TOto determine2643VVdetermine whether2644INwhether that2645WDTthat was2646VBDbe the2647DTthe same2648JJsame fact2649NNfact and2650CCand circumstance2651NNcircumstance .2652SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]2653LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank2654VVthank you2655PPyou ,2656,, counsel2657NNcounsel .2658SENT. Ms2659NNMs .2660SENT. Ratner2661NPRatner .2662SENT.

[MS. RATNER]2663LOC[MS. RATNER] Mr2664NPMr .2665SENT. Chief2666NPChief Justice2667NPJustice ,2668,, and2669CCand may2670MDmay it2671PPit please2672VVplease the2673DTthe Court2674NPCourt :2675:: I2676PPI want2677VVPwant to2678TOto be2679VBbe very2680RBvery clear2681JJclear about2682INabout what2683WPwhat is2684VBZbe and2685CCand is2686VBZbe not2687RBnot preserved2688VVNpreserve when2689WRBwhen a2690DTa defendant2691NNdefendant argues2692VVZargue for2693INfor a2694DTa lower2695JJRlow sentence2696NNsentence than2697INthan he2698PPhe receives2699VVZreceive .2700SENT. There2701EXthere are2702VBPbe three2703CDthree key2704JJkey points2705NNSpoint .2706SENT. First2707RBfirst ,2708,, a2709DTa defendant2710NNdefendant who2711WPwho argues2712VVZargue for2713INfor a2714DTa lower2715JJRlow sentence2716NNsentence does2717VVZdo preserve2718VVpreserve the2719DTthe claim2720NNclaim that2721IN/thatthat the2722DTthe district2723NNdistrict court2724NNcourt unreasonably2725RBunreasonably declined2726VVDdecline to2727TOto grant2728VVgrant the2729DTthe leniency2730NNleniency requested2731VVDrequest .2732SENT. Second2733RBsecond ,2734,, a2735DTa defendant2736NNdefendant does2737VVZdo not2738RBnot preserve2739VVpreserve any2740DTany procedural2741JJprocedural challenges2742NNSchallenge or2743CCor any2744DTany challenges2745NNSchallenge ,2746,, however2747RBhowever labeled2748VVNlabel ,2749,, that2750WDTthat go2751VVPgo to2752TOto something2753NNsomething other2754JJother than2755INthan the2756DTthe length2757NNlength of2758INof the2759DTthe sentence2760NNsentence .2761SENT. And2762CCand ,2763,, third2764JJthird ,2765,, a2766DTa defendant2767NNdefendant who2768WPwho argues2769VVZargue for2770INfor leniency2771NNleniency on2772INon one2773CDone ground2774NNground in2775INin the2776DTthe district2777NNdistrict court2778NNcourt does2779VVZdo not2780RBnot preserve2781VVpreserve a2782DTa claim2783NNclaim for2784INfor leniency2785NNleniency on2786INon a2787DTa different2788JJdifferent ground2789NNground .2790SENT. Those2791DTthose three2792CDthree points2793NNSpoint all2794RBall come2795VVPcome from2796INfrom the2797DTthe same2798JJsame overarching2799JJoverarching principle2800NNprinciple that2801IN/thatthat parties2802NNSparty need2803VVPneed to2804TOto give2805VVgive the2806DTthe district2807NNdistrict court2808NNcourt an2809DTan opportunity2810NNopportunity to2811TOto consider2812VVconsider and2813CCand resolve2814VVresolve their2815PP$their claims2816NNSclaim .2817SENT. But2818CCbut ,2819,, under2820INunder Rule2821NPRule 512822CD@card@ ,2823,, they2824PPthey need2825VVPneed to2826TOto give2827VVgive the2828DTthe district2829NNdistrict court2830NNcourt one2831CDone opportunity2832NNopportunity ,2833,, not2834RBnot two2835CDtwo .2836SENT. And2837CCand that2838DTthat 's2839VBZbe fundamentally2840RBfundamentally where2841WRBwhere the2842DTthe court2843NNcourt below2844INbelow erred2845VVNerr .2846SENT. I2847PPI think2848VVPthink that2849IN/thatthat Petitioner2850NNpetitioner has2851VHZhave highlighted2852VVNhighlight some2853DTsome of2854INof the2855DTthe problems2856NNSproblem .2857SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]2858LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] On2859INon your2860PP$your ...2861:... on2862INon your2863PP$your first2864JJfirst two2865CDtwo points2866NNSpoint ,2867,, in2868INin my2869PP$my experience2870NNexperience ,2871,, a2872DTa substantive2873JJsubstantive unreasonableness2874NNunreasonableness claim2875NNclaim is2876VBZbe almost2877RBalmost always2878RBalways coupled2879VVNcouple with2880INwith a2881DTa procedural2882JJprocedural failure2883NNfailure to2884TOto explain2885VVexplain claim2886NNclaim .2887SENT. And2888CCand you2889PPyou 're2890VBPbe saying2891VVGsay you2892PPyou do2893VVPdo n't2894RBn't need2895VVneed to2896TOto object2897VVobject for2898INfor the2899DTthe first2900JJfirst ,2901,, but2902CCbut you2903PPyou do2904VVPdo need2905VVneed to2906TOto object2907VVobject for2908INfor the2909DTthe second2910JJsecond ,2911,, when2912WRBwhen they2913PPthey 're2914VBPbe almost2915RBalmost always2916RBalways coupled2917VVNcouple .2918SENT. [MS. RATNER]2919LOC[MS. RATNER] So2920RBso let2921VVlet me2922PPme make2923VVmake this2924DTthis very2925RBvery clear2926JJclear .2927SENT. We2928PPwe think2929VVPthink Rule2930NPRule 512931CD@card@ applies2932VVZapply equally2933RBequally to2934TOto both2935DTboth of2936INof those2937DTthose .2938SENT. We2939PPwe think2940VVPthink that2941IN/thatthat ,2942,, as2943INas a2944DTa practical2945JJpractical matter2946NNmatter ,2947,, the2948DTthe first2949JJfirst half2950NNhalf of2951INof Rule2952NPRule 512953CD@card@ ,2954,, the2955DTthe affirmative2956JJaffirmative request2957NNrequest ,2958,, is2959VBZbe often2960RBoften going2961VVGgo to2962TOto be2963VBbe the2964DTthe way2965NNway that2966IN/thatthat substantive2967JJsubstantive reasonableness2968NNreasonableness claims2969NNSclaim are2970VBPbe preserved2971VVNpreserve ,2972,, whereas2973INwhereas ,2974,, as2975INas a2976DTa practical2977JJpractical matter2978NNmatter ,2979,, the2980DTthe second2981JJsecond half2982NNhalf of2983INof Rule2984NPRule 512985CD@card@ is2986VBZbe often2987RBoften going2988VVGgo to2989TOto be2990VBbe the2991DTthe way2992NNway the2993DTthe procedural2994JJprocedural reasonableness2995NNreasonableness claims2996NNSclaim are2997VBPbe preserved2998VVNpreserve .2999SENT. And3000CCand that3001DTthat 's3002VBZbe just3003RBjust because3004INbecause of3005INof the3006DTthe way3007NNway sentencing3008NNsentencing hearings3009NNShearing occur3010VVPoccur .3011SENT. So3012INso the3013DTthe whole3014JJwhole point3015NNpoint of3016INof a3017DTa sentence3018NNsentence hearing3019NNhearing ...3020:... sentencing3021NNsentencing hearing3022NNhearing is3023VBZbe for3024INfor parties3025NNSparty to3026TOto advocate3027VVadvocate to3028TOto the3029DTthe Court3030NPCourt what3031WPwhat they3032PPthey think3033VVPthink the3034DTthe appropriate3035JJappropriate sentence3036NNsentence is3037VBZbe .3038SENT. They3039PPthey put3040VVDput the3041DTthe district3042NNdistrict court3043NNcourt then3044RBthen on3045INon notice3046NNnotice of3047INof those3048DTthose arguments3049NNSargument .3050SENT. By3051INby contrast3052NNcontrast ,3053,, a3054DTa party3055NNparty is3056VBZbe n't3057RBn't going3058VVGgo to3059TOto have3060VHhave the3061DTthe opportunity3062NNopportunity to3063TOto tell3064VVtell the3065DTthe district3066NNdistrict court3067NNcourt in3068INin advance3069NNadvance ,3070,, we3071PPwe think3072VVPthink you3073PPyou 've3074VHPhave given3075VVNgive an3076DTan insufficient3077JJinsufficient explanation3078NNexplanation until3079INuntil they3080PPthey 've3081VHPhave actually3082RBactually heard3083VVNhear the3084DTthe explanation3085NNexplanation .3086SENT. And3087CCand so3088RBso it3089PPit 's3090VBZbe just3091RBjust because3092INbecause of3093INof that3094DTthat practical3095JJpractical reason3096NNreason that3097IN/thatthat those3098DTthose are3099VBPbe ...3100:... are3101VBPbe going3102VVGgo to3103TOto tend3104VVtend to3105TOto be3106VBbe after-the-fact3107JJafter-the-fact objections3108NNSobjection instead3109RBinstead of3110INof in-advance3111NNin-advance requests3112NNSrequest .3113SENT. And3114CCand that3115WDTthat we3116PPwe ...3117:... we3118PPwe really3119RBreally do3120VVPdo think3121VVthink is3122VBZbe the3123DTthe key3124JJkey point3125NNpoint here3126RBhere ,3127,, that3128IN/thatthat we3129PPwe 're3130VBPbe not3131RBnot asking3132VVGask for3133INfor any3134DTany sort3135NNsort of3136INof exception3137NNexception for3138INfor Rule3139NPRule 513140CD@card@ .3141SENT. It3142PPit applies3143VVZapply the3144DTthe same3145JJsame in3146INin the3147DTthe sentencing3148NNsentencing context3149NNcontext as3150INas outside3151INoutside the3152DTthe sentencing3153NNsentencing context3154NNcontext .3155SENT. It3156PPit applies3157VVZapply to3158TOto substantive3159JJsubstantive reasonableness3160NNreasonableness claims3161NNSclaim and3162CCand procedural3163JJprocedural reasonableness3164NNreasonableness claims3165NNSclaim .3166SENT. We3167PPwe 're3168VBPbe just3169RBjust asking3170VVGask ,3171,, is3172VBZbe this3173DTthis particular3174JJparticular claim3175NNclaim one3176PPone that3177IN/thatthat the3178DTthe district3179NNdistrict court3180NNcourt has3181VHZhave already3182RBalready had3183VHNhave an3184DTan opportunity3185NNopportunity to3186TOto consider3187VVconsider ?3188SENT? And3189CCand ...3190:... [JUSTICE ALITO]3191LOC[JUSTICE ALITO] On3192INon your3193PP$your ...3194:... on3195INon your3196PP$your third3197JJthird point3198NNpoint about3199INabout providing3200VVGprovide the3201DTthe ground3202NNground for3203INfor the3204DTthe ...3205:... the3206DTthe ...3207:... the3208DTthe claim3209NNclaim on3210INon ...3211:... on3212INon appeal3213NNappeal ,3214,, by3215INby that3216DTthat ,3217,, do3218VVdo you3219PPyou mean3220VVmean just3221RBjust a3222DTa citation3223NNcitation to3224TOto the3225DTthe ...3226:... a3227DTa general3228JJgeneral category3229NNcategory of3230INof ...3231:... of3232INof sentencing3233NNsentencing consideration3234NNconsideration ,3235,, or3236CCor do3237VVPdo you3238PPyou mean3239VVmean a3240DTa specific3241JJspecific argument3242NNargument or3243CCor pointing3244VVGpoint out3245RPout specific3246JJspecific facts3247NNSfact ?3248SENT? What3249WPWhat do3250VVPdo you3251PPyou mean3252VVPmean ?3253SENT? [MS. RATNER]3254LOC[MS. RATNER] We3255PPwe mean3256VVPmean that3257IN/thatthat the3258DTthe circumstances3259NNScircumstance that3260IN/thatthat the3261DTthe defendant3262NNdefendant feels3263NNSfeel are3264VBPbe important3265JJimportant under3266INunder Section3267NPSection 35533268CD@card@ (3269(( a3270DTa )3271)) in3272INin order3273NNorder to3274TOto entitle3275VVentitle him3276PPhim to3277TOto the3278DTthe lower3279JJRlow sentence3280NNsentence he3281PPhe 's3282VBZbe asking3283VVGask for3284INfor .3285SENT. And3286CCand so3287RBso ,3288,, to3289TOto ...3290:... to3291TOto give3292VVgive a3293DTa simple3294JJsimple hypothetical3295JJhypothetical ,3296,, a3297DTa defendant3298NNdefendant who3299WPwho is3300VBZbe in3301INin the3302DTthe district3303NNdistrict court3304NNcourt and3305CCand says3306VVZsay :3307:: I3308PPI deserve3309VVPdeserve a3310DTa below-guidelines3311JJbelow-guidelines sentence3312NNsentence because3313INbecause of3314INof my3315PP$my family3316NNfamily background3317NNbackground and3318CCand mitigating3319JJmitigating circumstances3320NNScircumstance in3321INin my3322PP$my family3323NNfamily history3324NNhistory ,3325,, has3326VHZhave not3327RBnot preserved3328VVNpreserve a3329DTa claim3330NNclaim for3331INfor appeal3332NNappeal that3333IN/thatthat he3334PPhe deserves3335VVZdeserve a3336DTa below-guidelines3337JJbelow-guidelines sentence3338NNsentence because3339INbecause of3340INof his3341PP$his reduced3342VVNreduce role3343NNrole in3344INin the3345DTthe offense3346NNoffense .3347SENT. That3348DTthat has3349VHZhave n't3350RBn't fairly3351RBfairly put3352VVput the3353DTthe district3354NNdistrict court3355NNcourt on3356INon notice3357NNnotice of3358INof the3359DTthe substance3360NNsubstance of3361INof his3362PP$his claim3363NNclaim ,3364,, and3365CCand so3366RBso that3367WDTthat can3368MDcan 't3369RB't be3370VBbe thought3371VVNthink of3372INof as3373RBas having3374VHGhave sufficiently3375RBsufficiently preserved3376VVNpreserve the3377DTthe ...3378:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]3379LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] But3380CCbut how3381JJhow ...3382:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]3383LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] I3384PPI take3385VVPtake it3386PPit that3387IN/thatthat you3388PPyou 're3389VBPbe not3390RBnot suggesting3391VVGsuggest that3392IN/thatthat one3393CDone of3394INof those3395DTthose grounds3396NNSground has3397VHZhave to3398TOto be3399VBbe specifically3400RBspecifically linked3401VVNlink to3402TOto a3403DTa statutory3404JJstatutory factor3405NNfactor ,3406,, is3407VBZbe that3408IN/thatthat correct3409JJcorrect ?3410SENT? [MS. RATNER]3411LOC[MS. RATNER] We3412PPwe are3413VBPbe n't3414RBn't ...3415:... again3416RBagain ,3417,, the3418DTthe overarching3419JJoverarching question3420NNquestion is3421VBZbe going3422VVGgo to3423TOto be3424VBbe an3425DTan issue3426NNissue of3427INof fair3428JJfair notice3429NNnotice .3430SENT. So3431RBso ,3432,, as3433INas a3434DTa general3435JJgeneral matter3436NNmatter ,3437,, no3438UHno ,3439,, it3440PPit 's3441VBZbe not3442RBnot necessarily3443RBnecessarily the3444DTthe case3445NNcase that3446IN/thatthat those3447DTthose types3448NNStype of3449INof factual3450JJfactual circumstances3451NNScircumstance have3452VHPhave to3453TOto be3454VBbe particularly3455RBparticularly tied3456VVNtie up3457RPup to3458TOto deterrence3459NNdeterrence or3460CCor the3461DTthe seriousness3462NNseriousness of3463INof the3464DTthe offense3465NNoffense or3466CCor what3467WPwhat have3468VHPhave you3469PPyou .3470SENT. I3471PPI ...3472:... I3473PPI could3474MDcould imagine3475VVimagine a3476DTa case3477NNcase where3478WRBwhere a3479DTa defendant3480NNdefendant 's3481POS's argument3482NNargument is3483VBZbe so3484RBso intimately3485RBintimately tied3486VVNtie to3487TOto one3488CDone of3489INof those3490DTthose factors3491NNSfactor that3492IN/thatthat it3493PPit has3494VHZhave n't3495RBn't really3496RBreally given3497VVNgive the3498DTthe district3499NNdistrict court3500NNcourt notice3501NNnotice ,3502,, fair3503JJfair notice3504NNnotice ,3505,, which3506WDTwhich ,3507,, again3508RBagain ,3509,, we3510PPwe think3511VVPthink is3512VBZbe the3513DTthe touchstone3514NNtouchstone ,3515,, but3516CCbut ,3517,, in3518INin the3519DTthe ordinary3520JJordinary case3521NNcase ,3522,, no3523UHno ,3524,, we3525PPwe do3526VVPdo n't3527RBn't think3528VVthink that3529IN/thatthat that3530DTthat 's3531VBZbe going3532VVGgo to3533TOto have3534VHhave to3535TOto be3536VBbe tied3537VVNtie up3538RBup that3539IN/thatthat neatly3540RBneatly .3541SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3542LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] How3543WRBHow do3544VVPdo we3545PPwe write3546VVwrite ...3547:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]3548LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] In3549INin your3550PP$your ...3551:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3552LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] I3553PPI 'm3554VBPbe sorry3555JJsorry .3556SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]3557LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Go3558NPGo ahead3559RBahead .3560SENT. [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3561LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] How3562WRBHow do3563VVPdo we3564PPwe write3565VVwrite this3566DTthis opinion3567NNopinion ?3568SENT? Do3569VVPdo we3570PPwe need3571VVPneed to3572TOto get3573VVget into3574INinto all3575DTall of3576INof this3577DTthis ?3578SENT? Are3579VBPbe you3580PPyou asking3581VVGask us3582PPus to3583TOto give3584VVgive a3585DTa sort3586NNsort of3587INof bible3588NNbible ,3589,, this3590DTthis preserves3591NNSpreserve enough3592RBenough ,3593,, that3594WDTthat does3595VVZdo n't3596RBn't preserve3597VVpreserve enough3598RBenough ?3599SENT? Is3600VBZbe it3601PPit adequate3602JJadequate for3603INfor us3604PPus just3605RBjust to3606TOto say3607VVsay it3608PPit 's3609VBZbe too3610RBtoo absolute3611JJabsolute a3612DTa rule3613NNrule to3614TOto require3615VVrequire a3616DTa specific3617JJspecific objection3618NNobjection under3619INunder all3620DTall circumstances3621NNScircumstance so3622RBso long3623RBlong as3624INas a3625DTa defendant3626NNdefendant has3627VHZhave given3628VVNgive us3629PPus a3630DTa fair3631NNfair ...3632:... given3633VVNgive the3634DTthe district3635NNdistrict court3636NNcourt notice3637NNnotice of3638INof its3639PP$its grounds3640NNSground for3641INfor a3642DTa particular3643JJparticular different3644JJdifferent sentence3645NNsentence than3646INthan given3647VVNgive ,3648,, that3649IN/thatthat that3650DTthat 's3651VBZbe enough3652JJenough ?3653SENT? [MS. RATNER]3654LOC[MS. RATNER] So3655RBso ,3656,, Justice3657NPJustice Sotomayor3658NPSotomayor ,3659,, I3660PPI think3661VVPthink that3662IN/thatthat you3663PPyou could3664MDcould write3665VVwrite an3666DTan opinion3667NNopinion that3668WDTthat says3669VVZsay the3670DTthe Fifth3671NPFifth Circu3672NPCircu it3673PPit 's3674POS's rule3675NNrule is3676VBZbe wrong3677JJwrong ;3678:; it3679PPit 's3680VBZbe too3681RBtoo absolute3682JJabsolute a3683DTa rule3684NNrule in3685INin requiring3686VVGrequire a3687DTa post3688NNpost hoc3689FWhoc objection3690NNobjection .3691SENT. But3692CCbut I3693PPI do3694VVPdo think3695VVthink there3696EXthere would3697MDwould be3698VBbe significant3699JJsignificant value3700NNvalue in3701INin the3702DTthe Court3703NPCourt offering3704VVGoffer some3705DTsome clarity3706NNclarity ,3707,, not3708RBnot just3709RBjust ...3710:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]3711LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] For3712INfor you3713PPyou ,3714,, obviously3715RBobviously ,3716,, but3717CCbut ...3718:... [MS. RATNER]3719LOC[MS. RATNER] Well3720UHWell ,3721,, I3722PPI ...3723:... Justice3724NPJustice Sotomayor3725NPSotomayor ,3726,, the3727DTthe reason3728NNreason that3729IN/thatthat I3730PPI 'm3731VBPbe saying3732VVGsay that3733WDTthat is3734VBZbe that3735IN/thatthat I3736PPI think3737VVPthink the3738DTthe courts3739NNScourt of3740INof appeals3741NNSappeal have3742VHPhave largely3743RBlargely got3744VVNget these3745DTthese questions3746NNSquestion correct3747VVPcorrect .3748SENT. There3749EXthere 's3750VBZbe really3751RBreally just3752RBjust one3753CDone outlier3754NNoutlier in3755INin one3756CDone direction3757NNdirection or3758CCor another3759DTanother .3760SENT. And3761CCand I3762PPI do3763VVPdo think3764VVthink there3765EXthere could3766MDcould be3767VBbe some3768DTsome potential3769NNpotential in3770INin this3771DTthis Court3772NPCourt 's3773POS's decision3774NNdecision here3775RBhere to3776TOto introduce3777VVintroduce confusion3778NNconfusion if3779INif it3780PPit 's3781VBZbe not3782RBnot clear3783JJclear about3784RBabout just3785RBjust what3786WPwhat is3787VBZbe ...3788:... what3789WPwhat is3790VBZbe and3791CCand is3792VBZbe not3793RBnot preserved3794VVNpreserve when3795WRBwhen a3796DTa defendant3797NNdefendant makes3798VVZmake these3799DTthese sorts3800NNSsort of3801INof arguments3802NNSargument .3803SENT. As3804RBas for3805INfor what3806WPwhat an3807DTan opinion3808NNopinion would3809MDwould look3810VVlook like3811INlike ,3812,, we3813PPwe would3814MDwould ...3815:... we3816PPwe think3817VVPthink that3818IN/thatthat Just3819RBjust ...3820:... Judge3821NPJudge Sutton3822NPSutton 's3823POS's opinion3824NNopinion for3825INfor the3826DTthe en3827NNen banc3828NNbanc Sixth3829NPSixth Circuit3830NPCircuit in3831INin United3832NPUnited States3833NPSStates against3834INagainst Vonner3835NPVonner navigates3836VVZnavigate these3837DTthese various3838JJvarious issues3839NNSissue .3840SENT. It3841PPit describes3842VVZdescribe how3843WRBhow Rule3844NPRule 513845NP@card@ applies3846VVZapply in3847INin these3848DTthese contexts3849NNScontext and3850CCand ,3851,, again3852RBagain ,3853,, does3854VVZdo n't3855RBn't suggest3856VVsuggest that3857IN/thatthat there3858EXthere are3859VBPbe any3860DTany exceptions3861NNSexception to3862TOto Rule3863NPRule 513864CD@card@ but3865CCbut explains3866VVZexplain how3867WRBhow ,3868,, as3869INas a3870DTa practical3871JJpractical matter3872NNmatter ,3873,, that3874DTthat analysis3875NNanalysis is3876VBZbe going3877VVGgo to3878TOto look3879VVlook a3880DTa little3881RBlittle different3882JJdifferent in3883INin some3884DTsome contexts3885NNScontext than3886INthan others3887NNSother .3888SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]3889LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Back3890RBback to3891TOto your3892PP$your hypothetical3893JJhypothetical with3894INwith Justice3895NPJustice Alito3896NPAlito ,3897,, I3898PPI 'm3899VBPbe not3900RBnot sure3901JJsure how3902WRBhow appellate3903JJappellate courts3904NNScourt are3905VBPbe supposed3906VVNsuppose to3907TOto do3908VVdo this3909DTthis because3910INbecause it3911PPit 's3912VBZbe not3913RBnot that3914IN/thatthat it3915PPit 's3916VBZbe not3917RBnot preserved3918VVNpreserve ;3919:; it3920PPit 's3921VBZbe that3922IN/thatthat it3923PPit 's3924VBZbe reviewed3925VVNreview under3926INunder plain3927JJplain error3928NNerror .3929SENT. So3930RBso you3931PPyou would3932MDwould have3933VHhave ,3934,, say3935VVsay ,3936,, family3937NNfamily history3938NNhistory reviewed3939VVNreview under3940INunder substantive3941JJsubstantive unreasonableness3942NNunreasonableness and3943CCand reduced3944VVNreduce role3945NNrole in3946INin the3947DTthe offense3948NNoffense reviewed3949VVNreview under3950INunder plain3951JJplain error3952NNerror for3953INfor one3954CDone inquiry3955NNinquiry of3956INof overall3957JJoverall substantive3958JJsubstantive unreasonableness3959NNunreasonableness ,3960,, when3961WRBwhen substantive3962JJsubstantive unreasonableness3963NNunreasonableness ...3964:... let3965VVlet me3966PPme just3967RBjust add3968VVPadd this3969DTthis ...3970:... itself3971PPitself ,3972,, when3973WRBwhen you3974PPyou actually3975RBactually apply3976VVapply it3977PPit in3978INin practice3979NNpractice ,3980,, is3981VBZbe a3982DTa lot3983NNlot like3984INlike plain3985JJplain error3986NNerror .3987SENT. Obvious3988JJobvious it3989PPit 's3990VBZbe so3991RBso deferential3992JJdeferential in3993INin most3994JJSmost courts3995NNScourt of3996INof appeals3997NNSappeal ,3998,, the3999DTthe kind4000NNkind of4001INof obvious4002JJobvious errors4003NNSerror when4004WRBwhen you4005PPyou say4006VVPsay substantive4007JJsubstantive ...4008:... substantively4009RBsubstantively unreasonable4010JJunreasonable .4011SENT. So4012RBso I4013PPI 'm4014VBPbe not4015RBnot sure4016JJsure how4017WRBhow a4018DTa judge4019NNjudge can4020MDcan keep4021VVkeep all4022PDTall that4023DTthat straight4024JJstraight .4025SENT. [MS. RATNER]4026LOC[MS. RATNER] Well4027UHwell ,4028,, I4029PPI think4030VVPthink ,4031,, in4032INin practice4033NNpractice ,4034,, it4035PPit has4036VHZhave n't4037RBn't been4038VBNbe that4039RBthat complicated4040VVNcomplicate ,4041,, Justice4042NPJustice Kavanaugh4043NPKavanaugh ,4044,, and4045CCand courts4046NNScourt ...4047:... again4048RBagain ,4049,, this4050DTthis is4051VBZbe the4052DTthe rule4053NNrule that4054IN/thatthat we4055PPwe think4056VVPthink is4057VBZbe in4058INin play4059NNplay in4060INin ...4061:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4062LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well4063UHwell ,4064,, I4065PPI think4066VVPthink that4067IN/thatthat supports4068NNSsupport ...4069:... [MS. RATNER]4070LOC[MS. RATNER] ...4071:... most4072JJSmost of4073INof the4074DTthe courts4075NNScourt of4076INof appeals4077NNSappeal .4078SENT. And4079CCand ...4080:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4081LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Keep4082VVkeep going4083VVGgo .4084SENT. [MS. RATNER]4085LOC[MS. RATNER] The4086DTthe way4087NNway that4088IN/thatthat that4089WDTthat shakes4090VVZshake out4091RBout is4092VBZbe usually4093RBusually one4094CDone of4095INof two4096CDtwo ways4097NNSway .4098SENT. So4099RBso ,4100,, first4101RBfirst ,4102,, a4103DTa court4104NNcourt of4105INof appeals4106NNSappeal might4107MDmight say4108VVsay ,4109,, looking4110VVGlook at4111INat all4112DTall of4113INof those4114DTthose circumstances4115NNScircumstance that4116IN/thatthat you4117PPyou preserved4118VVDpreserve ,4119,, we4120PPwe do4121VVPdo n't4122RBn't see4123VVsee this4124DTthis as4125INas a4126DTa substantively4127RBsubstantively unreasonable4128JJunreasonable sentence4129NNsentence or4130CCor we4131PPwe do4132VVPdo n't4133RBn't see4134VVsee this4135DTthis as4136INas an4137DTan abuse4138NNabuse of4139INof discretion4140NNdiscretion .4141SENT. And4142CCand then4143RBthen ,4144,, if4145INif we4146PPwe look4147VVPlook to4148TOto the4149DTthe circumstances4150NNScircumstance you4151PPyou are4152VBPbe raising4153VVGraise for4154INfor the4155DTthe first4156JJfirst time4157NNtime ,4158,, nothing4159NNnothing in4160INin there4161EXthere suggests4162VVZsuggest that4163IN/thatthat our4164PP$our analysis4165NNanalysis of4166INof substantive4167JJsubstantive reasonableness4168NNreasonableness is4169VBZbe plain4170JJplain error4171NNerror .4172SENT. That4173DTthat 's4174VBZbe sort4175NNsort of4176INof option4177NNoption 14178CD1 they4179PPthey do4180VVPdo .4181SENT. Option4182NNoption 24183CD2 ,4184,, and4185CCand ...4186:... and4187CCand sort4188NNsort of4189INof going4190VVGgo to4191TOto your4192PP$your second4193JJsecond point4194NNpoint that4195IN/thatthat this4196DTthis is4197VBZbe already4198RBalready a4199DTa deferential4200JJdeferential standard4201NNstandard ,4202,, we4203PPwe see4204VVPsee fairly4205RBfairly often4206RBoften courts4207NNScourt say4208VVPsay ,4209,, well4210RBwell ,4211,, even4212RBeven assuming4213VVGassume that4214IN/thatthat all4215DTall of4216INof this4217DTthis had4218VHDhave been4219VBNbe preserved4220VVNpreserve ,4221,, it4222PPit would4223MDwould n't4224RBn't be4225VBbe a4226DTa substantively4227RBsubstantively unreasonable4228JJunreasonable sentence4229NNsentence ,4230,, or4231CCor it4232PPit would4233MDwould n't4234RBn't be4235VBbe an4236DTan abuse4237NNabuse of4238INof discretion4239NNdiscretion .4240SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4241LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Would4242MDwould ...4243:... can4244MDcan you4245PPyou imagine4246VVimagine a4247DTa sentence4248NNsentence that4249WDTthat 's4250VBZbe substantively4251RBsubstantively unreasonable4252JJunreasonable but4253CCbut not4254RBnot plain4255JJplain error4256NNerror ?4257SENT? [MS. RATNER]4258LOC[MS. RATNER] Yes4259NPYes ,4260,, we4261PPwe do4262VVPdo think4263VVthink that4264IN/thatthat there4265EXthere is4266VBZbe a4267DTa small4268JJsmall sliver4269NNsliver of4270INof daylight4271NNdaylight between4272INbetween these4273DTthese standards4274NNSstandard .4275SENT. I4276PPI ...4277:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]4278LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] It4279PPit 's4280VBZbe extremely4281RBextremely small4282JJsmall ?4283SENT? [MS. RATNER]4284LOC[MS. RATNER] It4285PPit is4286VBZbe very4287RBvery small4288JJsmall .4289SENT. We4290PPwe think4291VVPthink that4292WDTthat 's4293VBZbe exactly4294RBexactly why4295WRBwhy ,4296,, if4297INif this4298DTthis case4299NNcase is4300VBZbe vacated4301VVNvacate and4302CCand remanded4303VVNremand ,4304,, we4305PPwe would4306MDwould advocate4307VVadvocate for4308INfor the4309DTthe same4310JJsame outcome4311NNoutcome under4312INunder a4313DTa substantive4314JJsubstantive reasonable4315JJreasonable review4316NNreview .4317SENT. 24318CD2 You4319PPyou might4320MDmight think4321VVthink of4322INof it4323PPit as4324RBas analogous4325JJanalogous to4326TOto double4327VVdouble deference4328NNdeference under4329INunder AEDPA4330NPAEDPA ,4331,, that4332WDTthat ...4333:... there4334EXthere 's4335VBZbe already4336RBalready a4337DTa deferential4338JJdeferential standard4339NNstandard of4340INof review4341NNreview ,4342,, but4343CCbut if4344INif you4345PPyou were4346VBDbe to4347TOto add4348VVadd plain4349JJplain error4350NNerror on4351INon top4352NNtop ,4353,, you4354PPyou 'd4355MDwould get4356VVget sort4357NNsort of4358INof an4359DTan extra4360JJextra little4361JJlittle bit4362NNbit of4363INof deference4364NNdeference .4365SENT. Again4366RBagain ,4367,, it4368PPit probably4369RBprobably would4370MDwould n't4371RBn't be4372VBbe dispositive4373JJdispositive in4374INin most4375JJSmost cases4376NNScase ,4377,, and4378CCand that4379DTthat 's4380VBZbe why4381WRBwhy it4382PPit does4383VVZdo n't4384RBn't create4385VVcreate that4386IN/thatthat many4387JJmany difficulties4388NNSdifficulty for4389INfor courts4390NNScourt in4391INin practice4392NNpractice .4393SENT. But4394CCbut ,4395,, at4396INat the4397DTthe end4398NNend of4399INof the4400DTthe day4401NNday ,4402,, the4403DTthe key4404JJkey problem4405NNproblem with4406INwith the4407DTthe Fifth4408NPFifth Circu4409NPCircu it4410PPit 's4411VBZbe rule4412NNrule here4413RBhere is4414VBZbe that4415IN/thatthat it4416PPit 's4417VBZbe requiring4418VVGrequire parties4419NNSparty to4420TOto say4421VVsay ,4422,, in4423INin the4424DTthe district4425NNdistrict court4426NNcourt ,4427,, the4428DTthe applicable4429JJapplicable appellate4430JJappellate standard4431NNstandard of4432INof review4433NNreview .4434SENT. And4435CCand that4436DTthat 's4437VBZbe just4438RBjust not4439RBnot something4440NNsomething that4441IN/thatthat litigants4442NNSlitigant are4443VBPbe required4444VVNrequire to4445TOto do4446VVdo in4447INin any4448DTany other4449JJother context4450NNcontext .4451SENT. The4452DTthe district4453NNdistrict court4454NNcourt 's4455POS's job4456NNjob ,4457,, under4458INunder Rita4459NPRita and4460CCand Kimbrough4461NPKimbrough and4462CCand Gall4463NPGall ,4464,, is4465VBZbe to4466TOto decide4467VVdecide the4468DTthe sentence4469NNsentence that4470WDTthat is4471VBZbe appropriate4472JJappropriate under4473INunder the4474DTthe Section4475NPSection 35534476CD@card@ (4477(( a4478DTa )4479)) factors4480NNSfactor .4481SENT. And4482CCand reasonableness4483NNreasonableness is4484VBZbe just4485RBjust not4486RBnot an4487DTan inquiry4488NNinquiry that4489WDTthat comes4490VVZcome into4491INinto play4492NNplay until4493INuntil the4494DTthe case4495NNcase is4496VBZbe appealed4497VVNappeal ,4498,, and4499CCand that4500DTthat 's4501VBZbe the4502DTthe inquiry4503NNinquiry that4504IN/thatthat the4505DTthe court4506NNcourt of4507INof appeals4508NNSappeal will4509MDwill apply4510VVapply in4511INin the4512DTthe first4513JJfirst instance4514NNinstance .4515SENT. If4516INif there4517EXthere are4518VBPbe no4519RBno further4520JJRfurther questions4521NNSquestion ,4522,, we4523PPwe would4524MDwould ask4525VVask the4526DTthe Court4527NPCourt to4528TOto vacate4529VVvacate and4530CCand remand4531VVremand .4532SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]4533LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank4534VVthank you4535PPyou ,4536,, counsel4537NNcounsel .4538SENT. Mr4539NPMr .4540SENT. Allen4541NPAllen .4542SENT.

[MR. ALLEN]4543LOC[MR. ALLEN] Thank4544VVthank you4545PPyou ,4546,, Mr4547NPMr .4548SENT. Chief4549NPChief Justice4550NPJustice ,4551,, and4552CCand may4553MDmay it4554PPit please4555VVplease the4556DTthe Court4557NPCourt :4558:: The4559DTthe question4560NNquestion in4561INin this4562DTthis case4563NNcase is4564VBZbe what4565WPwhat a4566DTa party4567NNparty must4568MDmust do4569VVdo in4570INin the4571DTthe district4572NNdistrict court4573NNcourt to4574TOto preserve4575VVpreserve a4576DTa substantive4577JJsubstantive reasonableness4578NNreasonableness argument4579NNargument for4580INfor appeal4581NNappeal .4582SENT. In4583INin particular4584JJparticular ,4585,, under4586INunder Rule4587NPRule 514588CD@card@ ,4589,, what4590WPwhat must4591MDmust a4592DTa party4593NNparty argue4594VVPargue and4595CCand when4596WRBwhen must4597MDmust they4598PPthey argue4599VVargue it4600PPit ?4601SENT? Let4602VVlet me4603PPme start4604VVstart with4605INwith the4606DTthe what4607WPwhat .4608SENT. To4609TOTo preserve4610VVpreserve a4611DTa substantive4612JJsubstantive reasonableness4613NNreasonableness argument4614NNargument ,4615,, a4616DTa party4617NNparty must4618MDmust argue4619VVargue two4620CDtwo things4621NNSthing .4622SENT. One4623CDOne ,4624,, they4625PPthey must4626MDmust make4627VVmake the4628DTthe distinct4629JJdistinct legal4630JJlegal argument4631NNargument that4632IN/thatthat an4633DTan imposed4634VVNimpose sentence4635NNsentence is4636VBZbe beyond4637INbeyond the4638DTthe range4639NNrange of4640INof choice4641NNchoice a4642DTa district4643NNdistrict court4644NNcourt has4645VHZhave under4646INunder 35534647CD@card@ (4648(( a4649DTa )4650)) and4651CCand ,4652,, two4653CDtwo ,4654,, identify4655VVidentify the4656DTthe facts4657NNSfact and4658CCand circumstances4659NNScircumstance supporting4660VVGsupport that4661DTthat argument4662NNargument .4663SENT. Those4664DTthose are4665VBPbe the4666DTthe legal4667JJlegal and4668CCand factual4669JJfactual grounds4670NNSground underpinning4671VVGunderpin a4672DTa substantive4673JJsubstantive reasonableness4674NNreasonableness argument4675NNargument .4676SENT. And4677CCand under4678INunder the4679DTthe best4680JJSgood interpretation4681NNinterpretation of4682INof Rule4683NPRule 514684CD@card@ ,4685,, a4686DTa statement4687NNstatement of4688INof grounds4689NNSground is4690VBZbe necessary4691JJnecessary to4692TOto preserve4693VVpreserve a4694DTa claim4695NNclaim of4696INof error4697NNerror .4698SENT. Now4699RBnow let4700VVlet me4701PPme turn4702VVturn to4703TOto the4704DTthe when4705WRBwhen .4706SENT. In4707INin most4708JJSmost cases4709NNScase ,4710,, these4711DTthese arguments4712NNSargument are4713VBPbe most4714RBSmost sensibly4715RBsensibly made4716VVNmake after4717INafter sentencing4718VVGsentence because4719INbecause it4720PPit 's4721VBZbe only4722RBonly then4723RBthen that4724IN/thatthat the4725DTthe parties4726NNSparty know4727VVPknow the4728DTthe imposed4729VVNimpose sentence4730NNsentence and4731CCand the4732DTthe district4733NNdistrict court4734NNcourt 's4735POS's reasoning4736NNreasoning for4737INfor it4738PPit .4739SENT. And4740CCand in4741INin most4742JJSmost cases4743NNScase ,4744,, I4745PPI think4746VVPthink you4747PPyou need4748VVPneed to4749TOto know4750VVknow those4751DTthose things4752NNSthing to4753TOto really4754RBreally determine4755VVdetermine whether4756INwhether you4757PPyou have4758VHPhave a4759DTa viable4760JJviable substantive4761JJsubstantive reasonableness4762NNreasonableness argument4763NNargument to4764TOto assert4765VVassert .4766SENT. But4767CCbut ,4768,, technically4769RBtechnically ,4770,, nothing4771NNnothing in4772INin Rule4773NPRule 514774CD@card@ stops4775NNSstop a4776DTa party4777NNparty from4778INfrom making4779VVGmake those4780DTthose arguments4781NNSargument prior4782RBprior to4783TOto imposition4784NNimposition of4785INof a4786DTa sentence4787NNsentence ,4788,, and4789CCand so4790RBso preservation4791NNpreservation pre-sentencing4792VVGpre-sentence is4793VBZbe possible4794JJpossible in4795INin certain4796JJcertain cases4797NNScase .4798SENT. The4799DTthe government4800NNgovernment appears4801VVZappear to4802TOto agree4803VVagree with4804INwith at4805INat least4806JJSleast part4807NNpart of4808INof this4809DTthis rule4810NNrule ;4811:; in4812INin particular4813JJparticular ,4814,, the4815DTthe government4816NNgovernment agrees4817VVZagree that4818IN/thatthat a4819DTa party4820NNparty must4821MDmust present4822VVpresent the4823DTthe district4824NNdistrict court4825NNcourt with4826INwith the4827DTthe facts4828NNSfact and4829CCand circumstances4830NNScircumstance supporting4831VVGsupport a4832DTa substantive4833JJsubstantive reasonableness4834NNreasonableness argument4835NNargument in4836INin order4837NNorder to4838TOto rely4839VVrely ...4840:... rely4841VVrely on4842INon those4843DTthose same4844JJsame facts4845NNSfact and4846CCand circumstances4847NNScircumstance on4848INon appeal4849NNappeal .4850SENT. And4851CCand ,4852,, frankly4853RBfrankly ,4854,, that4855WDTthat does4856VVZdo not4857RBnot seem4858VVseem to4859TOto be4860VBbe a4861DTa controversial4862JJcontroversial or4863CCor novel4864JJnovel proposition4865NNproposition .4866SENT. A4867DTa party4868NNparty that4869WDTthat never4870RBnever argued4871VVDargue below4872RBbelow that4873IN/thatthat a4874DTa sentence4875NNsentence was4876VBDbe substantively4877RBsubstantively impermissible4878JJimpermissible ,4879,, because4880RBbecause ,4881,, for4882INfor example4883NNexample ,4884,, it4885PPit created4886VVDcreate unwarranted4887JJunwarranted sentencing4888NNsentencing disparities4889NNSdisparity ,4890,, should4891MDshould not4892RBnot be4893VBbe able4894JJable to4895TOto advance4896VVadvance that4897DTthat same4898JJsame argument4899NNargument for4900INfor the4901DTthe first4902JJfirst time4903NNtime on4904INon appeal4905NNappeal .4906SENT. The4907DTthe somewhat4908RBsomewhat harder4909JJRhard question4910NNquestion ,4911,, and4912CCand the4913DTthe question4914NNquestion on4915INon which4916WDTwhich I4917PPI part4918VVPpart ways4919NNSway with4920INwith the4921DTthe ...4922:... with4923INwith the4924DTthe government4925NNgovernment ,4926,, concerns4927VVZconcern the4928DTthe first4929JJfirst part4930NNpart of4931INof the4932DTthe rule4933NNrule .4934SENT. To4935TOTo preserve4936VVpreserve a4937DTa substantive4938JJsubstantive reasonableness4939NNreasonableness argument4940NNargument ,4941,, is4942VBZbe it4943PPit simply4944RBsimply enough4945JJenough to4946TOto ask4947VVask for4948INfor a4949DTa shorter4950JJRshort sentence4951NNsentence in4952INin the4953DTthe district4954NNdistrict court4955NNcourt ,4956,, or4957CCor must4958MDmust a4959DTa party4960NNparty do4961VVPdo more4962JJRmore than4963INthan that4964DTthat ?4965SENT? And4966CCand for4967INfor several4968JJseveral reasons4969NNSreason ,4970,, I4971PPI think4972VVPthink the4973DTthe Fifth4974NPFifth Circuit4975NPCircuit is4976VBZbe required4977VVNrequire ...4978:... correct4979VVcorrect to4980TOto require4981VVrequire parties4982NNSparty to4983TOto do4984VVdo more4985RBRmore .4986SENT. Most4987RBSmost fundamentally4988RBfundamentally ,4989,, merely4990RBmerely arguing4991VVGargue for4992INfor a4993DTa shorter4994JJRshort sentence4995NNsentence does4996VVZdo not4997RBnot address4998VVaddress the4999DTthe same5000JJsame issue5001NNissue that5002WDTthat is5003VBZbe before5004INbefore the5005DTthe court5006NNcourt of5007INof appeals5008NNSappeal on5009INon a5010DTa substantive5011JJsubstantive reasonableness5012NNreasonableness challenge5013NNchallenge .5014SENT. The5015DTthe court5016NNcourt of5017INof appeals5018NNSappeal will5019MDwill not5020RBnot evaluate5021VVevaluate the5022DTthe reasonableness5023NNreasonableness of5024INof the5025DTthe defendant5026NNdefendant 's5027POS's requested5028VVNrequest sentence5029NNsentence .5030SENT. Rather5031RBrather ,5032,, the5033DTthe court5034NNcourt will5035MDwill evaluate5036VVevaluate the5037DTthe reasonableness5038NNreasonableness of5039INof the5040DTthe imposed5041VVNimpose sentence5042NNsentence .5043SENT. A5044DTa party5045NNparty seeking5046VVGseek to5047TOto preserve5048VVpreserve a5049DTa substantive5050JJsubstantive reasonableness5051NNreasonableness argument5052NNargument must5053MDmust present5054VVpresent that5055DTthat same5056JJsame issue5057NNissue to5058TOto the5059DTthe district5060NNdistrict court5061NNcourt ,5062,, but5063CCbut ...5064:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5065LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] I5066PPI think5067VVPthink one5068PPone of5069INof the5070DTthe strongest5071JJSstrong things5072NNSthing Ms5073NNMs .5074SENT. Turner5075NPTurner said5076VVDsay ,5077,, in5078INin addition5079NNaddition to5080TOto her5081PP$her legal5082JJlegal arguments5083NNSargument ,5084,, was5085VBDbe that5086IN/thatthat ,5087,, in5088INin practice5089NNpractice ,5090,, this5091DTthis never5092RBnever produces5093VVZproduce a5094DTa different5095JJdifferent result5096NNresult because5097INbecause the5098DTthe judge5099NNjudge ,5100,, presumably5101RBpresumably ,5102,, has5103VHZhave already5104RBalready ...5105:... and5106CCand in5107INin reality5108NNreality ,5109,, has5110VHZhave already5111RBalready thought5112VVNthink about5113INabout what5114WPwhat is5115VBZbe the5116DTthe reasonable5117JJreasonable sentence5118NNsentence .5119SENT. So5120RBso for5121INfor them5122PPthem to5123TOto object5124VVobject I5125PPI think5126VVthink that5127WDTthat 's5128VBZbe unreasonable5129JJunreasonable is5130VBZbe going5131VVGgo to5132TOto go5133VVgo nowhere5134RBnowhere .5135SENT. So5136RBso why5137WRBwhy ,5138,, in5139INin addition5140NNaddition to5141TOto the5142DTthe legal5143JJlegal points5144NNSpoint ,5145,, as5146INas a5147DTa practical5148JJpractical matter5149NNmatter require5150VVrequire that5151DTthat ?5152SENT? [MR. ALLEN]5153LOC[MR. ALLEN] A5154DTa couple5155NNcouple responses5156NNSresponse to5157TOto that5158WDTthat ,5159,, Justice5160NPJustice Kavanaugh5161NPKavanaugh .5162SENT. First5163JJfirst of5164INof all5165DTall ,5166,, I5167PPI fully5168RBfully concede5169VVPconcede that5170IN/thatthat in5171INin most5172JJSmost cases5173NNScase it5174PPit probably5175RBprobably won5176MDwill 't5177RB't make5178VVmake much5179RBmuch of5180INof a5181DTa difference5182NNdifference ,5183,, but5184CCbut I5185PPI think5186VVPthink that5187WDTthat 's5188VBZbe more5189JJRmore because5190INbecause of5191INof the5192DTthe very5193RBvery limited5194JJlimited nature5195NNnature of5196INof substantive5197JJsubstantive reasonableness5198NNreasonableness challenges5199NNSchallenge than5200INthan it5201PPit is5202VBZbe because5203INbecause of5204INof the5205DTthe preservation5206NNpreservation rules5207NNSrule .5208SENT. Substantive5209JJsubstantive reasonableness5210NNreasonableness challenges5211NNSchallenge are5212VBPbe very5213RBvery difficult5214JJdifficult to5215TOto win5216VVwin because5217INbecause ,5218,, most5219JJSmost of5220INof the5221DTthe time5222NNtime ,5223,, district5224NNdistrict courts5225NNScourt are5226VBPbe sentencing5227VVGsentence well5228RBwell within5229INwithin the5230DTthe discretion5231NNdiscretion that5232IN/thatthat they5233PPthey have5234VHPhave .5235SENT. So5236RBso I5237PPI fully5238RBfully concede5239VVPconcede that5240IN/thatthat most5241JJSmost of5242INof the5243DTthe time5244NNtime it5245PPit won5246MDwill 't5247RB't make5248VVmake a5249DTa difference5250NNdifference .5251SENT. However5252RBhowever ,5253,, I5254PPI do5255VVPdo n't5256RBn't think5257VVthink that5258WDTthat means5259VVZmean that5260IN/thatthat it5261PPit won5262MDwill 't5263RB't always5264RBalways have5265VHPhave some5266DTsome benefit5267NNbenefit .5268SENT. And5269CCand I5270PPI think5271VVPthink it5272PPit will5273MDwill have5274VHhave benefit5275NNbenefit in5276INin those5277DTthose cases5278NNScase where5279WRBwhere a5280DTa substantive5281JJsubstantive reasonableness5282NNreasonableness argument5283NNargument is5284VBZbe likely5285JJlikely to5286TOto have5287VHhave the5288DTthe most5289JJSmost viability5290NNviability .5291SENT. And5292CCand that5293DTthat 's5294VBZbe a5295DTa case5296NNcase in5297INin which5298WDTwhich ,5299,, for5300INfor whatever5301WDTwhatever reason5302NNreason ,5303,, the5304DTthe imposed5305VVNimpose sentence5306NNsentence differs5307VVZdiffer dramatically5308RBdramatically from5309INfrom the5310DTthe sentence5311NNsentence that5312WDTthat ...5313:... from5314INfrom the5315DTthe guidelines5316NNSguideline range5317NNrange and5318CCand from5319INfrom the5320DTthe sentence5321NNsentence the5322DTthe parties5323NNSparty have5324VHPhave requested5325VVNrequest .5326SENT. For5327INfor example5328NNexample ,5329,, if5330INif a5331DTa defendant5332NNdefendant requests5333VVZrequest a5334DTa 40-month5335JJ40-month sentence5336NNsentence and5337CCand the5338DTthe government5339NNgovernment ...5340:... the5341DTthe court5342NNcourt imposes5343VVZimpose a5344DTa 200-month5345JJ200-month sentence5346NNsentence .5347SENT. And5348CCand these5349DTthese cases5350NNScase do5351VVPdo happen5352VVhappen from5353INfrom time5354NNtime to5355TOto time5356NNtime in5357INin the5358DTthe courts5359NNScourt of5360INof appeals5361NNSappeal .5362SENT. In5363INin that5364DTthat circumstance5365NNcircumstance ,5366,, I5367PPI think5368VVPthink it5369PPit 's5370VBZbe likely5371JJlikely that5372IN/thatthat the5373DTthe ...5374:... that5375IN/thatthat the5376DTthe district5377NNdistrict court5378NNcourt has5379VHZhave used5380VVNuse reasoning5381NNreasoning and5382CCand rationales5383NNSrationale that5384IN/thatthat the5385DTthe parties5386NNSparty might5387MDmight not5388RBnot theretofore5389RBtheretofore have5390VHhave addressed5391VVNaddress or5392CCor had5393VHDhave an5394DTan opportunity5395NNopportunity to5396TOto argue5397VVargue about5398RBabout .5399SENT. And5400CCand so5401RBso ,5402,, in5403INin that5404DTthat situation5405NNsituation ,5406,, there5407EXthere is5408VBZbe some5409DTsome benefit5410NNbenefit ,5411,, I5412PPI think5413VVPthink ,5414,, to5415TOto having5416VHGhave a5417DTa party5418NNparty to5419TOto ...5420:... to5421TOto ...5422:... to5423TOto apprise5424VVapprise the5425DTthe court5426NNcourt to5427TOto say5428VVsay :5429:: Your5430PP$your Honor5431NPHonor ,5432,, I5433PPI think5434VVPthink the5435DTthe sentence5436NNsentence you5437PPyou imposed5438VVNimpose is5439VBZbe not5440RBnot only5441RBonly one5442CDone I5443PPI disagree5444VVPdisagree with5445INwith but5446CCbut is5447VBZbe so5448RBso excessive5449JJexcessive ,5450,, it5451PPit 's5452VBZbe outside5453INoutside the5454DTthe range5455NNrange of5456INof permissible5457JJpermissible sentences5458NNSsentence you5459PPyou could5460MDcould impose5461VVimpose ,5462,, and5463CCand let5464VVlet me5465PPme explain5466VVexplain to5467TOto you5468PPyou why5469WRBwhy that5470DTthat is5471VBZbe .5472SENT. Let5473VVlet me5474PPme engage5475VVengage with5476INwith you5477PPyou on5478INon some5479DTsome of5480INof the5481DTthe reasoning5482NNreasoning you5483PPyou gave5484VVDgive ,5485,, why5486WRBwhy the5487DTthe party5488NNparty thinks5489VVZthink the5490DTthe court5491NNcourt ...5492:... the5493DTthe court5494NNcourt might5495MDmight have5496VHhave put5497VVNput too5498RBtoo much5499JJmuch weight5500NNweight on5501INon an5502DTan impermissible5503JJimpermissible factor5504NNfactor ,5505,, not5506RBnot enough5507JJenough weight5508NNweight on5509INon a5510DTa very5511RBvery important5512JJimportant factor5513NNfactor .5514SENT. So5515INso the5516DTthe short5517JJshort answer5518NNanswer is5519VBZbe ,5520,, in5521INin most5522JJSmost cases5523NNScase ,5524,, it5525PPit probably5526RBprobably won5527MDwill 't5528RB't make5529VVmake much5530RBmuch of5531INof a5532DTa difference5533NNdifference ,5534,, but5535CCbut in5536INin the5537DTthe cases5538NNScase where5539WRBwhere a5540DTa substantive5541JJsubstantive reasonableness5542NNreasonableness argument5543NNargument is5544VBZbe likely5545JJlikely to5546TOto matter5547VVmatter the5548DTthe most5549JJSmost ,5550,, it5551PPit very5552RBvery well5553RBwell could5554MDcould have5555VHhave ...5556:... could5557MDcould make5558VVmake a5559DTa difference5560NNdifference .5561SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5562LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] In5563INin the5564DTthe case5565NNcase ...5566:... in5567INin the5568DTthe hypo5569NNhypo you5570PPyou raised5571VVDraise ,5572,, the5573DTthe counsel5574NNcounsel almost5575RBalmost always5576RBalways raise5577VVraise a5578DTa procedural5579JJprocedural failure5580NNfailure to5581TOto explain5582VVexplain .5583SENT. Objection5584NNobjection ...5585:... in5586INin your5587PP$your hypo5588NNhypo ...5589:... Judge5590NPJudge ,5591,, you5592PPyou have5593VHPhave n't5594RBn't explained5595VVNexplain that5596IN/thatthat sufficiently5597RBsufficiently .5598SENT. Right5599RBright ?5600SENT? [MR. ALLEN]5601LOC[MR. ALLEN] Correct5602JJcorrect .5603SENT. You5604PPyou know5605VVPknow ,5606,, so5607RBso ...5608:... and5609CCand I5610PPI think5611VVPthink that5612WDTthat gets5613VVZget to5614TOto two5615CDtwo points5616NNSpoint .5617SENT. One5618PPone is5619VBZbe I5620PPI think5621VVPthink what5622WPwhat 's5623VBZbe procedural5624JJprocedural and5625CCand what5626WPwhat 's5627VBZbe substance5628NNsubstance in5629INin this5630DTthis circumstance5631NNcircumstance can5632MDcan get5633VVget very5634RBvery difficult5635JJdifficult sometimes5636RBsometimes ,5637,, and5638CCand it5639PPit 's5640VBZbe an5641DTan issue5642NNissue that5643IN/thatthat the5644DTthe courts5645NNScourt of5646INof appeals5647NNSappeal have5648VHPhave struggled5649VVNstruggle with5650INwith .5651SENT. For5652INfor example5653NNexample ,5654,, if5655INif you5656PPyou disagree5657VVPdisagree with5658INwith the5659DTthe district5660NNdistrict court5661NNcourt 's5662POS's reasoning5663NNreasoning ,5664,, is5665VBZbe it5666PPit a5667DTa procedural5668JJprocedural problem5669NNproblem because5670INbecause the5671DTthe court5672NNcourt failed5673VVDfail to5674TOto adequately5675RBadequately explain5676VVexplain it5677PPit ,5678,, or5679CCor is5680VBZbe it5681PPit a5682DTa substantive5683JJsubstantive problem5684NNproblem because5685INbecause the5686DTthe court5687NNcourt explained5688VVDexplain it5689PPit ,5690,, you5691PPyou just5692RBjust disagree5693VVPdisagree with5694INwith the5695DTthe reasoning5696NNreasoning the5697DTthe court5698NNcourt gave5699VVDgive ?5700SENT? I5701PPI think5702VVPthink it5703PPit could5704MDcould be5705VBbe argued5706VVNargue either5707DTeither way5708NNway .5709SENT. And5710CCand I5711PPI think5712VVPthink the5713DTthe courts5714NNScourt of5715INof appeals5716NNSappeal have5717VHPhave sometimes5718RBsometimes struggled5719VVNstruggle with5720INwith what5721WPwhat it5722PPit is5723VBZbe .5724SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]5725LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Well5726UHwell ,5727,, they5728PPthey mostly5729RBmostly get5730VVPget funneled5731VVNfunnel into5732INinto procedural5733JJprocedural .5734SENT. [MR. ALLEN]5735LOC[MR. ALLEN] A5736DTa lot5737NNlot of5738INof times5739NNStime they5740PPthey do5741VVPdo .5742SENT. And5743CCand ,5744,, you5745PPyou know5746VVPknow ,5747,, as5748RBas ...5749:... as5750INas this5751DTthis Court5752NPCourt said5753VVDsay very5754RBvery clearly5755RBclearly in5756INin Gall5757NPGall ,5758,, you5759PPyou know5760VVPknow ,5761,, failure5762NNfailure to5763TOto adequately5764RBadequately explain5765VVexplain a5766DTa chosen5767VVNchoose sentence5768NNsentence is5769VBZbe a5770DTa procedural5771JJprocedural problem5772NNproblem that5773IN/thatthat I5774PPI think5775VVPthink everybody5776NNeverybody standing5777VVGstand up5778RPup here5779RBhere arguing5780VVGargue today5781NNtoday agrees5782VVZagree that5783IN/thatthat if5784INif you5785PPyou think5786VVPthink a5787DTa district5788NNdistrict court5789NNcourt has5790VHZhave not5791RBnot adequately5792RBadequately explained5793VVDexplain its5794PP$its chosen5795VVNchoose sentence5796NNsentence ,5797,, a5798DTa party5799NNparty should5800MDshould object5801VVobject to5802TOto that5803DTthat in5804INin the5805DTthe district5806NNdistrict court5807NNcourt and5808CCand give5809VVgive the5810DTthe district5811NNdistrict court5812NNcourt judge5813NNjudge an5814DTan opportunity5815NNopportunity to5816TOto correct5817VVcorrect it5818PPit .5819SENT. Well5820UHwell ,5821,, if5822INif that5823WDTthat 's5824VBZbe not5825RBnot true5826JJtrue ...5827:... if5828INif that5829WDTthat 's5830VBZbe true5831JJtrue ,5832,, I5833PPI guess5834VVPguess it5835PPit 's5836VBZbe hard5837JJhard for5838INfor me5839PPme to5840TOto see5841VVsee why5842WRBwhy a5843DTa party5844NNparty should5845MDshould n't5846RBn't also5847RBalso object5848VVobject if5849INif they5850PPthey disagree5851VVPdisagree with5852INwith some5853DTsome of5854INof the5855DTthe reasoning5856NNreasoning the5857DTthe district5858NNdistrict court5859NNcourt gave5860VVDgive and5861CCand that5862IN/thatthat reasoning5863NNreasoning had5864VHDhave n't5865RBn't been5866VBNbe discussed5867VVNdiscuss previously5868RBpreviously in5869INin sentencing5870NNsentencing .5871SENT. In5872INin that5873DTthat circumstance5874NNcircumstance ,5875,, it5876PPit would5877MDwould seem5878VVseem to5879TOto serve5880VVserve the5881DTthe purposes5882NNSpurpose of5883INof Rule5884NPRule 515885CD@card@ to5886TOto have5887VHhave a5888DTa rule5889NNrule that5890WDTthat asks5891VVZask the5892DTthe parties5893NNSparty to5894TOto apprise5895VVapprise the5896DTthe court5897NNcourt of5898INof ...5899:... of5900INof the5901DTthe ...5902:... that5903IN/thatthat the5904DTthe court5905NNcourt has5906VHZhave used5907VVNuse reasoning5908NNreasoning or5909CCor rationales5910NNSrationale that5911IN/thatthat the5912DTthe parties5913NNSparty disagree5914VVPdisagree with5915INwith ,5916,, that5917IN/thatthat it5918PPit believes5919VVZbelieve are5920VBPbe incorrect5921JJincorrect ,5922,, that5923IN/thatthat it5924PPit believes5925VVZbelieve are5926VBPbe impermissible5927JJimpermissible and5928CCand have5929VHhave the5930DTthe court5931NNcourt ...5932:... have5933VHPhave the5934DTthe parties5935NNSparty engage5936VVPengage with5937INwith the5938DTthe court5939NNcourt on5940INon that5941WDTthat to5942TOto give5943VVgive the5944DTthe district5945NNdistrict court5946NNcourt an5947DTan opportunity5948NNopportunity to5949TOto address5950VVaddress that5951IN/thatthat in5952INin the5953DTthe first5954JJfirst instance5955NNinstance ,5956,, such5957JJsuch that5958IN/thatthat the5959DTthe court5960NNcourt of5961INof appeals5962NNSappeal are5963VBPbe n't5964RBn't having5965VHGhave to5966TOto address5967VVaddress it5968PPit for5969INfor the5970DTthe first5971JJfirst time5972NNtime on5973INon appeal5974NNappeal .5975SENT. I5976PPI do5977VVPdo think5978VVthink ,5979,, in5980INin thinking5981VVGthink about5982INabout this5983DTthis ,5984,, the5985DTthe jury5986NNjury instruction5987NNinstruction analogy5988NNanalogy is5989VBZbe somewhat5990RBsomewhat helpful5991JJhelpful ,5992,, and5993CCand I5994PPI would5995MDwould concede5996VVconcede that5997IN/thatthat the5998DTthe jury5999NNjury instructions6000NNSinstruction are6001VBPbe governed6002VVNgovern by6003INby a6004DTa specific6005JJspecific rule6006NNrule ,6007,, the6008DTthe Federal6009NPFederal Rules6010NPSRules of6011INof Criminal6012NPCriminal Procedure6013NPProcedure ,6014,, Rule6015NPRule 306016CD@card@ .6017SENT. But6018CCbut ,6019,, in6020INin the6021DTthe jury6022NNjury instruction6023NNinstruction context6024NNcontext ,6025,, we6026PPwe do6027VVPdo require6028VVrequire parties6029NNSparty to6030TOto object6031VVobject to6032TOto a6033DTa provided6034VVNprovide instruction6035NNinstruction if6036INif they6037PPthey believe6038VVPbelieve it6039PPit 's6040VBZbe impermissible6041JJimpermissible ,6042,, and6043CCand we6044PPwe require6045VVPrequire that6046IN/thatthat even6047RBeven if6048INif they6049PPthey had6050VHDhave previously6051RBpreviously proposed6052VVNpropose an6053DTan instruction6054NNinstruction to6055TOto the6056DTthe district6057NNdistrict court6058NNcourt that6059WDTthat has6060VHZhave been6061VBNbe rejected6062VVNreject .6063SENT. I6064PPI think6065VVPthink the6066DTthe same6067JJsame principle6068NNprinciple applies6069VVZapply here6070RBhere .6071SENT. Just6072RBjust because6073INbecause a6074DTa party6075NNparty has6076VHZhave requested6077VVNrequest a6078DTa particular6079JJparticular sentence6080NNsentence does6081VVZdo not6082RBnot mean6083VVmean they6084PPthey 've6085VHPhave necessarily6086RBnecessarily and6087CCand inevitably6088RBinevitably argued6089VVDargue that6090IN/thatthat the6091DTthe actually6092RBactually imposed6093VVNimpose sentence6094NNsentence is6095VBZbe so6096RBso excessive6097JJexcessive and6098CCand so6099RBso extreme6100JJextreme that6101IN/thatthat it6102PPit 's6103VBZbe outside6104INoutside the6105DTthe range6106NNrange of6107INof ...6108:... of6109INof ...6110:... of6111INof permissible6112JJpermissible sentences6113NNSsentence the6114DTthe court6115NNcourt could6116MDcould have6117VHhave imposed6118VVNimpose .6119SENT. The6120DTthe district6121NNdistrict court6122NNcourt ...6123:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]6124LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Is6125VBZbe that6126DTthat ...6127:... is6128VBZbe that6129IN/thatthat the6130DTthe standard6131NNstandard ,6132,, so6133RBso excessive6134JJexcessive and6135CCand so6136RBso extreme6137JJextreme ?6138SENT? I6139PPI mean6140VVPmean ,6141,, the6142DTthe argument6143NNargument really6144RBreally is6145VBZbe simply6146RBsimply that6147IN/thatthat it6148PPit does6149VVZdo n't6150RBn't comply6151VVcomply with6152INwith the6153DTthe factors6154NNSfactor in6155INin 35536156CD@card@ ,6157,, right6158RBright ?6159SENT? [MR. ALLEN]6160LOC[MR. ALLEN] That6161DTthat is6162VBZbe the6163DTthe ...6164:... you6165PPyou know6166VVPknow ,6167,, that6168WDTthat 's6169VBZbe the6170DTthe ...6171:... the6172DTthe argument6173NNargument on6174INon appeal6175NNappeal ...6176:... the6177DTthe excessive6178JJexcessive or6179CCor extreme6180JJextreme is6181VBZbe my6182PP$my shorthand6183NNshorthand .6184SENT. That6185DTthat 's6186VBZbe not6187RBnot the6188DTthe standard6189NNstandard that6190IN/thatthat a6191DTa substantive6192JJsubstantive reasonableness6193NNreasonableness is6194VBZbe ,6195,, but6196CCbut I6197PPI think6198VVPthink when6199WRBwhen you6200PPyou view6201VVPview substantive6202JJsubstantive reasonableness6203NNreasonableness through6204INthrough the6205DTthe deferential6206JJdeferential analysis6207NNanalysis that6208IN/thatthat this6209DTthis Court6210NPCourt has6211VHZhave said6212VVNsay courts6213NNScourt of6214INof appeals6215NNSappeal are6216VBPbe to6217TOto apply6218VVapply to6219TOto district6220NNdistrict courts6221NNScourt ,6222,, generally6223RBgenerally ,6224,, what6225WPwhat courts6226VVZcourt of6227INof appeals6228NNSappeal are6229VBPbe doing6230VVGdo is6231VBZbe saying6232VVGsay ,6233,, we6234PPwe think6235VVPthink the6236DTthe sentence6237NNsentence you6238PPyou 've6239VHPhave imposed6240VVNimpose is6241VBZbe outside6242INoutside the6243DTthe discretion6244NNdiscretion you6245PPyou had6246VHDhave to6247TOto impose6248VVimpose the6249DTthe sentence6250NNsentence based6251VVNbase off6252INoff the6253DTthe 336254CD@card@ (6255(( a6256DTa )6257)) factors6258NNSfactor and6259CCand the6260DTthe reasons6261NNSreason you6262PPyou gave6263VVDgive ,6264,, the6265DTthe reasons6266NNSreason just6267RBjust ...6268:... even6269RBeven though6270INthough district6271NNdistrict courts6272NNScourt have6273VHPhave substantial6274JJsubstantial discretion6275NNdiscretion ,6276,, the6277DTthe reasons6278NNSreason the6279DTthe court6280NNcourt gave6281VVDgive do6282VVdo not6283RBnot support6284VVsupport the6285DTthe sentence6286NNsentence it6287PPit imposed6288VVDimpose .6289SENT. And6290CCand so6291RBso ,6292,, yes6293UHyes ,6294,, it6295PPit 's6296VBZbe a6297DTa ...6298:... it6299PPit 's6300VBZbe ...6301:... the6302DTthe way6303NNway this6304DTthis Court6305NPCourt put6306VVDput it6307PPit in6308INin Gall6309NPGall ,6310,, I6311PPI believe6312VVPbelieve ,6313,, Mr6314NPMr .6315SENT. Chief6316NPChief Justice6317NPJustice ,6318,, was6319VBDbe ,6320,, if6321INif there6322EXthere 's6323VBZbe an6324DTan unusually6325RBunusually harsh6326JJharsh or6327CCor unusually6328RBunusually lenient6329JJlenient sentence6330NNsentence that6331WDTthat 's6332VBZbe not6333RBnot justified6334VVNjustify by6335INby the6336DTthe reasons6337NNSreason the6338DTthe district6339NNdistrict court6340NNcourt gave6341VVDgive .6342SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]6343LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But6344CCbut ,6345,, Mr6346NPMr .6347SENT. Allen6348NPAllen ,6349,, in6350INin saying6351VVGsay what6352WPwhat you6353PPyou just6354RBjust did6355VVDdo ,6356,, are6357VBPbe you6358PPyou suggesting6359VVGsuggest that6360DTthat substantive6361JJsubstantive reasonableness6362NNreasonableness is6363VBZbe the6364DTthe standard6365NNstandard that6366IN/thatthat a6367DTa district6368NNdistrict court6369NNcourt should6370MDshould use6371VVuse in6372INin ...6373:... in6374INin assessing6375VVGassess what6376WPwhat the6377DTthe proper6378JJproper punishment6379NNpunishment is6380VBZbe ?6381SENT? [MR. ALLEN]6382LOC[MR. ALLEN] I6383PPI do6384VVPdo n't6385RBn't think6386VVthink so6387RBso ,6388,, Justice6389NPJustice Kagan6390NPKagan .6391SENT. What6392WPWhat I6393PPI ...6394:... I6395PPI think6396VVPthink my6397PP$my argument6398NNargument is6399VBZbe not6400RBnot so6401RBso much6402JJmuch that6403IN/thatthat a6404DTa district6405NNdistrict court6406NNcourt should6407MDshould be6408VBbe asking6409VVGask whether6410INwhether the6411DTthe sentence6412NNsentence is6413VBZbe substantively6414RBsubstantively unreasonable6415JJunreasonable or6416CCor a6417DTa party6418NNparty should6419MDshould be6420VBbe saying6421VVGsay it6422PPit 's6423VBZbe substantively6424RBsubstantively unreasonable6425JJunreasonable in6426INin the6427DTthe district6428NNdistrict court6429NNcourt .6430SENT. I6431PPI think6432VVPthink I6433PPI 'm6434VBPbe asking6435VVGask that6436IN/thatthat the6437DTthe ...6438:... the6439DTthe party6440NNparty assert6441VVPassert the6442DTthe grounds6443NNSground for6444INfor that6445DTthat argument6446NNargument ,6447,, the6448DTthe basis6449NNbasis for6450INfor that6451DTthat argument6452NNargument in6453INin the6454DTthe district6455NNdistrict court6456NNcourt .6457SENT. And6458CCand so6459RBso ,6460,, when6461WRBwhen you6462PPyou think6463VVPthink about6464INabout the6465DTthe purposes6466NNSpurpose of6467INof Rule6468NPRule 516469CD@card@ ,6470,, we6471PPwe want6472VVPwant parties6473NNSparty to6474TOto argue6475VVargue the6476DTthe same6477JJsame thing6478NNthing in6479INin the6480DTthe district6481NNdistrict court6482NNcourt that6483IN/thatthat they6484PPthey 're6485VBPbe then6486RBthen going6487VVGgo to6488TOto argue6489VVargue ...6490:... go6491VVgo on6492INon to6493TOto argue6494VVargue on6495INon appeal6496NNappeal .6497SENT. And6498CCand the6499DTthe basis6500NNbasis for6501INfor a6502DTa substantive6503JJsubstantive reasonableness6504NNreasonableness argument6505NNargument ,6506,, I6507PPI think6508VVPthink ,6509,, are6510VBPbe two6511CDtwo things6512NNSthing .6513SENT. One6514PPone is6515VBZbe the6516DTthe sentence6517NNsentence is6518VBZbe ...6519:... is6520VBZbe outside6521INoutside the6522DTthe range6523NNrange of6524INof permissible6525JJpermissible sentences6526NNSsentence that6527WDTthat could6528MDcould have6529VHhave been6530VBNbe imposed6531VVNimpose under6532INunder 35536533CD@card@ (6534(( a6535DTa )6536)) in6537INin light6538NNlight of6539INof the6540DTthe specific6541JJspecific facts6542NNSfact of6543INof the6544DTthe case6545NNcase and6546CCand ,6547,, two6548CDtwo ,6549,, the6550DTthe reasons6551NNSreason for6552INfor why6553WRBwhy that6554DTthat 's6555VBZbe true6556JJtrue .6557SENT. And6558CCand I6559PPI think6560VVPthink the6561DTthe rule6562NNrule that6563IN/thatthat we6564PPwe 've6565VHPhave put6566VVNput to6567TOto the6568DTthe Court6569NPCourt and6570CCand the6571DTthe rule6572NNrule that6573IN/thatthat I6574PPI think6575VVPthink the6576DTthe Fifth6577NPFifth Circuit6578NPCircuit applies6579VVZapply is6580VBZbe just6581RBjust asking6582VVGask parties6583NNSparty to6584TOto make6585VVmake those6586DTthose same6587JJsame arguments6588NNSargument in6589INin the6590DTthe district6591NNdistrict court6592NNcourt .6593SENT. That6594DTthat 's6595VBZbe going6596VVGgo to6597TOto be6598VBbe what6599WPwhat they6600PPthey present6601VVPpresent to6602TOto the6603DTthe Fifth6604NPFifth Circuit6605NPCircuit or6606CCor a6607DTa court6608NNcourt of6609INof appeals6610NNSappeal when6611WRBwhen they6612PPthey appeal6613VVPappeal it6614PPit .6615SENT. We6616PPwe want6617VVPwant parties6618NNSparty to6619TOto make6620VVmake those6621DTthose same6622JJsame ...6623:... the6624DTthe exact6625JJexact same6626JJsame arguments6627NNSargument in6628INin the6629DTthe district6630NNdistrict court6631NNcourt .6632SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]6633LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] That6634DTthat does6635VVZdo n't6636RBn't seem6637VVseem to6638TOto be6639VBbe what6640WPwhat the6641DTthe question6642NNquestion presented6643VVNpresent is6644VBZbe .6645SENT. I6646PPI mean6647VVPmean ,6648,, yes6649UHyes ,6650,, there6651EXthere might6652MDmight be6653VBbe questions6654NNSquestion in6655INin a6656DTa particular6657JJparticular case6658NNcase ,6659,, you6660PPyou know6661VVPknow ,6662,, if6663INif you6664PPyou say6665VVPsay the6666DTthe sentence6667NNsentence should6668MDshould be6669VBbe X6670NNX because6671INbecause I6672PPI cooperated6673VVDcooperate with6674INwith the6675DTthe government6676NNgovernment and6677CCand then6678RBthen the6679DTthe appeals6680NNSappeal court6681NNcourt ,6682,, you6683PPyou say6684VVPsay ,6685,, the6686DTthe sentence6687NNsentence should6688MDshould be6689VBbe X6690NNX because6691INbecause I6692PPI 'm6693VBPbe a6694DTa very6695RBvery sick6696JJsick man6697NNman ,6698,, you6699PPyou know6700VVPknow ,6701,, then6702RBthen you6703PPyou have6704VHPhave an6705DTan issue6706NNissue about6707INabout what6708WDTwhat grounds6709NNSground you6710PPyou presented6711VVDpresent .6712SENT. But6713CCbut that6714DTthat 's6715VBZbe not6716RBnot the6717DTthe issue6718NNissue that6719WDTthat 's6720VBZbe presented6721VVNpresent by6722INby the6723DTthe Fifth6724NPFifth Circu6725NPCircu it6726PPit 's6727VBZbe practice6728NNpractice ,6729,, is6730VBZbe it6731PPit ?6732SENT? The6733DTthe issue6734NNissue that6735WDTthat 's6736VBZbe presented6737VVNpresent by6738INby the6739DTthe Fifth6740NPFifth Circu6741NPCircu it6742PPit 's6743POS's practice6744NNpractice is6745VBZbe this6746DTthis requirement6747NNrequirement that6748WDTthat ...6749:... that6750IN/thatthat in6751INin ...6752:... that6753IN/thatthat after6754INafter the6755DTthe sentence6756NNsentence is6757VBZbe given6758VVNgive in6759INin the6760DTthe district6761NNdistrict court6762NNcourt ,6763,, the6764DTthe defendant6765NNdefendant have6766VHhave to6767TOto step6768VVstep up6769RPup and6770CCand say6771VVPsay ,6772,, you6773PPyou know6774VVPknow ,6775,, I6776PPI object6777VVPobject to6778TOto that6779DTthat ,6780,, Your6781PP$your Honor6782NPHonor .6783SENT. [MR. ALLEN]6784LOC[MR. ALLEN] So6785INso I6786PPI do6787VVPdo n't6788RBn't think6789VVthink that6790WDTthat 's6791VBZbe actually6792RBactually what6793WPwhat the6794DTthe Fifth6795NPFifth Circu6796NPCircu it6797PPit 's6798VBZbe doing6799VVGdo in6800INin practice6801NNpractice .6802SENT. And6803CCand I6804PPI think6805VVPthink this6806DTthis is6807VBZbe an6808DTan important6809JJimportant point6810NNpoint that6811WDTthat might6812MDmight help6813VVhelp the6814DTthe Court6815NPCourt .6816SENT. I6817PPI think6818VVPthink the6819DTthe Fifth6820NPFifth Circu6821NPCircu it6822PPit 's6823POS's rule6824NNrule is6825VBZbe much6826RBmuch more6827JJRmore about6828INabout what6829WPwhat a6830DTa party6831NNparty must6832MDmust say6833VVsay than6834INthan when6835WRBwhen a6836DTa party6837NNparty must6838MDmust say6839VVsay it6840PPit .6841SENT. We6842PPwe found6843VVDfind no6844DTno Fifth6845NPFifth Circuit6846NPCircuit case6847NNcase in6848INin which6849WDTwhich the6850DTthe Fifth6851NPFifth Circuit6852NPCircuit has6853VHZhave said6854VVNsay the6855DTthe timing6856NNtiming of6857INof an6858DTan objection6859NNobjection is6860VBZbe dispositive6861JJdispositive ,6862,, that6863IN/thatthat where6864WRBwhere the6865DTthe Fifth6866NPFifth Circuit6867NPCircuit said6868VVDsay ,6869,, you6870PPyou clearly6871RBclearly objected6872VVDobject to6873TOto the6874DTthe substantive6875JJsubstantive reasonableness6876NNreasonableness of6877INof the6878DTthe sentence6879NNsentence before6880INbefore imposition6881NNimposition of6882INof a6883DTa sentence6884NNsentence ,6885,, but6886CCbut you6887PPyou did6888VVDdo n't6889RBn't repeat6890VVrepeat it6891PPit after6892INafter ...6893:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]6894LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] If6895INif the6896DTthe Fifth6897NPFifth Circuit6898NPCircuit had6899VHDhave the6900DTthe rule6901NNrule that6902IN/thatthat I6903PPI 'm6904VBPbe suggesting6905VVGsuggest the6906DTthe Fifth6907NPFifth Circuit6908NPCircuit has6909VHZhave and6910CCand that6911IN/thatthat you6912PPyou 're6913VBPbe saying6914VVGsay it6915PPit does6916VVZdo n't6917RBn't have6918VHhave ,6919,, the6920DTthe ...6921:... if6922INif the6923DTthe Fifth6924NPFifth Circuit6925NPCircuit had6926VHDhave that6927DTthat rule6928NNrule ,6929,, would6930MDwould it6931PPit be6932VBbe a6933DTa violation6934NNviolation of6935INof the6936DTthe rules6937NNSrule ?6938SENT? [MR. ALLEN]6939LOC[MR. ALLEN] I6940PPI ...6941:... I6942PPI ...6943:... I6944PPI do6945VVPdo n't6946RBn't think6947VVthink that6948WDTthat would6949MDwould be6950VBbe the6951DTthe best6952JJSgood reading6953NNreading of6954INof Rule6955NPRule 516956CD@card@ and6957CCand that6958WDTthat 's6959VBZbe not6960RBnot the6961DTthe ...6962:... the6963DTthe approach6964NNapproach we6965PPwe 've6966VHPhave put6967VVNput to6968TOto the6969DTthe Court6970NPCourt .6971SENT. Again6972RBagain ,6973,, I6974PPI do6975VVPdo n't6976RBn't think6977VVthink the6978DTthe timing6979NNtiming of6980INof the6981DTthe objection6982NNobjection should6983MDshould matter6984VVmatter .6985SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]6986LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] I6987PPI hate6988VVPhate to6989TOto press6990VVpress that6991IN/thatthat a6992DTa little6993JJlittle bit6994NNbit ...6995:... [MR. ALLEN]6996LOC[MR. ALLEN] No6997NPNo ,6998,, go6999VVPgo ahead7000RBahead .7001SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7002LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...7003:... but7004CCbut not7005RBnot the7006DTthe best7007JJSgood reading7008NNreading of7009INof Rule7010NPRule 517011CD@card@ ?7012SENT? [MR. ALLEN]7013LOC[MR. ALLEN] It7014PPit ...7015:... it7016PPit ...7017:... it7018PPit ...7019:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]7020LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Is7021VBZbe that7022DTthat ...7023:... [MR. ALLEN]7024LOC[MR. ALLEN] ...7025:... it7026PPit would7027MDwould be7028VBbe an7029DTan incorrect7030JJincorrect reading7031NNreading of7032INof Rule7033NPRule 517034CD@card@ ...7035:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]7036LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Okay7037NPOkay .7038SENT. [MR. ALLEN]7039LOC[MR. ALLEN] ...7040:... to7041TOto answer7042VVanswer the7043DTthe question7044NNquestion directly7045RBdirectly .7046SENT. I7047PPI do7048VVPdo n't7049RBn't think7050VVthink Rule7051NPRule 517052CD@card@ requires7053VVZrequire these7054DTthese objections7055NNSobjection to7056TOto be7057VBbe made7058VVNmake at7059INat any7060DTany specific7061JJspecific point7062NNpoint in7063INin time7064NNtime during7065INduring the7066DTthe sentencing7067NNsentencing proceeding7068NNproceeding .7069SENT. All7070RBall they7071PPthey require7072VVPrequire is7073VBZbe that7074IN/thatthat a7075DTa party7076NNparty state7077NNstate the7078DTthe grounds7079NNSground at7080INat some7081DTsome point7082NNpoint .7083SENT. And7084CCand the7085DTthe grounds7086NNSground are7087VBPbe what7088WPwhat I7089PPI started7090VVDstart off7091RPoff articulating7092VVGarticulate my7093PP$my argument7094NNargument with7095INwith .7096SENT. Now7097RBnow I7098PPI think7099VVPthink most7100RBSmost sensibly7101RBsensibly ,7102,, I7103PPI think7104VVPthink these7105DTthese are7106VBPbe arguments7107NNSargument that7108WDTthat should7109MDshould really7110RBreally be7111VBbe made7112VVNmake after7113INafter sentencing7114VVGsentence because7115INbecause it7116PPit 's7117VBZbe only7118RBonly then7119RBthen that7120IN/thatthat you7121PPyou know7122VVPknow what7123WPwhat your7124PP$your sentence7125NNsentence is7126VBZbe and7127CCand what7128WPwhat the7129DTthe district7130NNdistrict court7131NNcourt 's7132POS's reasons7133NNSreason for7134INfor it7135PPit .7136SENT. And7137CCand I7138PPI think7139VVPthink only7140RBonly then7141RBthen would7142MDwould you7143PPyou be7144VBbe in7145INin a7146DTa position7147NNposition to7148TOto determine7149VVdetermine whether7150INwhether you7151PPyou have7152VHPhave a7153DTa viable7154JJviable substantive7155JJsubstantive reasonableness7156NNreasonableness argument7157NNargument to7158TOto make7159VVmake .7160SENT. But7161CCbut ...7162:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7163LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well7164UHWell ,7165,, and7166CCand maybe7167RBmaybe not7168RBnot even7169RBeven then7170RBthen .7171SENT. I7172PPI mean7173VVPmean ,7174,, the7175DTthe question7176NNquestion of7177INof what7178WDTwhat arguments7179NNSargument you7180PPyou 're7181VBPbe going7182VVGgo to7183TOto raise7184VVraise on7185INon appeal7186NNappeal is7187VBZbe not7188RBnot something7189NNsomething that7190WDTthat 's7191VBZbe immediately7192RBimmediately obvious7193JJobvious when7194WRBwhen ...7195:... when7196WRBwhen the7197DTthe sentence7198NNsentence comes7199VVZcome down7200RPdown .7201SENT. It7202PPit 's7203VBZbe something7204NNsomething that7205WDTthat usually7206RBusually requires7207VVZrequire some7208DTsome consideration7209NNconsideration ,7210,, some7211DTsome tactical7212JJtactical analysis7213NNanalysis ,7214,, all7215DTall sorts7216NNSsort of7217INof things7218NNSthing .7219SENT. So7220RBso I7221PPI wonder7222VVPwonder what7223WPwhat specificity7224NNspecificity you7225PPyou 're7226VBPbe requiring7227VVGrequire in7228INin this7229DTthis ,7230,, I7231PPI won7232MDwill 't7233RB't call7234VVcall it7235PPit an7236DTan exception7237NNexception since7238INsince that7239WDTthat 's7240VBZbe a7241DTa problem7242NNproblem for7243INfor you7244PPyou ,7245,, but7246CCbut this7247DTthis objection7248NNobjection ,7249,, this7250DTthis post7251NNpost hoc7252FWhoc objection7253NNobjection ?7254SENT? [MR. ALLEN]7255LOC[MR. ALLEN] So7256INso two7257CDtwo responses7258NNSresponse to7259TOto that7260WDTthat ,7261,, Mr7262NPMr .7263SENT. Chief7264NPChief Justice7265NPJustice .7266SENT. One7267PPone is7268VBZbe the7269DTthe concern7270NNconcern about7271INabout having7272VHGhave to7273TOto think7274VVthink about7275INabout arguments7276NNSargument on7277INon your7278PP$your feet7279NNSfoot is7280VBZbe n't7281RBn't unique7282JJunique to7283TOto the7284DTthe sentencing7285NNsentencing context7286NNcontext ,7287,, obviously7288RBobviously .7289SENT. There7290EXthere 's7291VBZbe all7292DTall kinds7293NNSkind of7294INof circumstances7295NNScircumstance in7296INin criminal7297JJcriminal trials7298NNStrial and7299CCand ...7300:... and7301CCand other7302JJother proceedings7303NNSproceeding where7304WRBwhere we7305PPwe do7306VVPdo expect7307VVexpect lawyers7308NNSlawyer to7309TOto be7310VBbe on7311INon their7312PP$their toes7313NNStoe in7314INin court7315NNcourt and7316CCand to7317TOto raise7318VVraise arguments7319NNSargument that7320RBthat ...7321:... that7322WDTthat come7323VVPcome up7324RPup to7325TOto them7326PPthem on7327INon the7328DTthe spot7329NNspot .7330SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]7331LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Well7332UHWell ,7333,, yeah7334RByeah ,7335,, but7336CCbut I7337PPI 'm7338VBPbe not7339RBnot trying7340VVGtry ...7341:... I7342PPI do7343VVPdo n't7344RBn't mean7345VVmean think7346VVthink of7347INof every7348DTevery argument7349NNargument you7350PPyou have7351VHPhave .7352SENT. I7353PPI mean7354VVPmean ,7355,, do7356VVPdo some7357DTsome ...7358:... figure7359VVPfigure out7360RPout ,7361,, well7362UHwell ,7363,, we7364PPwe do7365VVPdo have7366VHhave an7367DTan argument7368NNargument on7369INon this7370DTthis point7371NNpoint ,7372,, but7373CCbut we7374PPwe do7375VVPdo n't7376RBn't think7377VVthink we7378PPwe 're7379VBPbe going7380VVGgo to7381TOto ...7382:... if7383INif we7384PPwe do7385VVPdo n't7386RBn't win7387VVwin on7388INon this7389DTthis point7390NNpoint ,7391,, we7392PPwe do7393VVPdo n't7394RBn't think7395VVthink we7396PPwe 'll7397MDwill win7398VVwin on7399INon that7400IN/thatthat ,7401,, so7402INso we7403PPwe 're7404VBPbe only7405RBonly going7406VVGgo to7407TOto make7408VVmake this7409DTthis .7410SENT. I7411PPI mean7412VVPmean ,7413,, it7414PPit 's7415VBZbe a7416DTa little7417RBlittle more7418RBRmore nuanced7419JJnuanced than7420INthan objections7421NNSobjection during7422INduring the7423DTthe course7424NNcourse of7425INof the7426DTthe trial7427NNtrial .7428SENT. [MR. ALLEN]7429LOC[MR. ALLEN] Perhaps7430RBperhaps .7431SENT. But7432CCbut I7433PPI also7434RBalso think7435VVPthink that7436IN/thatthat parties7437NNSparty do7438VVPdo do7439VVdo a7440DTa tremendous7441JJtremendous amount7442NNamount of7443INof work7444NNwork going7445VVGgo in7446INin to7447TOto preparing7448VVGprepare for7449INfor a7450DTa sentencing7451NNsentencing proceeding7452NNproceeding .7453SENT. You7454PPyou know7455VVPknow ,7456,, they7457PPthey review7458VVPreview the7459DTthe PSR7460NNPSR .7461SENT. They7462PPthey know7463VVPknow what7464WPwhat they7465PPthey 're7466VBPbe going7467VVGgo to7468TOto go7469VVgo in7470RPin and7471CCand argue7472VVargue for7473INfor on7474INon behalf7475NNbehalf of7476INof their7477PP$their client7478NNclient ,7479,, and7480CCand then7481RBthen they7482PPthey can7483MDcan hear7484VVhear the7485DTthe district7486NNdistrict court7487NNcourt 's7488POS's reasoning7489NNreasoning and7490CCand determine7491VVdetermine whether7492INwhether there7493EXthere 's7494VBZbe something7495NNsomething in7496INin that7497DTthat reasoning7498NNreasoning that7499IN/thatthat they7500PPthey think7501VVPthink is7502VBZbe factually7503RBfactually wrong7504JJwrong or7505CCor the7506DTthe court7507NNcourt is7508VBZbe putting7509VVGput too7510RBtoo much7511JJmuch weight7512NNweight on7513INon an7514DTan inappropriate7515JJinappropriate factor7516NNfactor or7517CCor not7518RBnot enough7519JJenough weight7520NNweight on7521INon a7522DTa factor7523NNfactor that7524IN/thatthat they7525PPthey think7526VVPthink is7527VBZbe very7528RBvery important7529JJimportant .7530SENT. So7531RBso it7532PPit might7533MDmight be7534VBbe more7535RBRmore difficult7536JJdifficult in7537INin ...7538:... in7539INin cases7540NNScase where7541WRBwhere sentencing7542NNsentencing proceedings7543NNSproceeding go7544VVPgo for7545INfor an7546DTan entire7547JJentire day7548NNday than7549INthan it7550PPit will7551MDwill be7552VBbe for7553INfor a7554DTa case7555NNcase like7556INlike this7557DTthis one7558CDone ,7559,, where7560WRBwhere it7561PPit took7562VVDtake five7563CDfive or7564CCor six7565CDsix minutes7566NNSminute .7567SENT. But7568CCbut I7569PPI do7570VVPdo n't7571RBn't think7572VVthink it7573PPit 's7574VBZbe unreasonable7575JJunreasonable to7576TOto require7577VVrequire parties7578NNSparty to7579TOto do7580VVdo that7581IN/thatthat ,7582,, and7583CCand ,7584,, in7585INin fact7586NNfact ,7587,, you7588PPyou know7589VVPknow ,7590,, it7591PPit ...7592:... it7593PPit ...7594:... it7595PPit 's7596VBZbe what7597WPwhat I7598PPI think7599VVPthink the7600DTthe purpose7601NNpurpose of7602INof Rule7603NPRule 517604CD@card@ is7605VBZbe intended7606VVNintend to7607TOto serve7608VVserve ,7609,, which7610WDTwhich is7611VBZbe to7612TOto keep7613VVkeep defense7614NNdefense counsel7615NNcounsel on7616INon their7617PP$their toes7618NNStoe and7619CCand to7620TOto alert7621VValert the7622DTthe court7623NNcourt that7624IN/thatthat they7625PPthey think7626VVPthink the7627DTthe court7628NNcourt has7629VHZhave made7630VVNmake some7631DTsome error7632NNerror that7633WDTthat has7634VHZhave caused7635VVNcause it7636PPit to7637TOto reach7638VVreach an7639DTan incorrect7640JJincorrect result7641NNresult ,7642,, so7643RBso that7644IN/thatthat the7645DTthe district7646NNdistrict court7647NNcourt is7648VBZbe considering7649VVGconsider that7650IN/thatthat in7651INin the7652DTthe first7653JJfirst instance7654NNinstance and7655CCand that7656IN/thatthat courts7657NNScourt of7658INof appeals7659NNSappeal are7660VBPbe n't7661RBn't having7662VHGhave to7663TOto consider7664VVconsider that7665DTthat .7666SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7667LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Most7668JJSmost of7669INof the7670DTthe grounds7671NNSground will7672MDwill have7673VHhave been7674VBNbe identified7675VVNidentify in7676INin the7677DTthe sentencing7678NNsentencing memos7679NNSmemo after7680INafter the7681DTthe PSR7682NNPSR and7683CCand at7684INat the7685DTthe sentencing7686NNsentencing hearing7687NNhearing ,7688,, presumably7689RBpresumably .7690SENT. If7691INif they7692PPthey 've7693VHPhave all7694RBall been7695VBNbe identified7696VVNidentify there7697RBthere ,7698,, do7699VVdo they7700PPthey ...7701:... do7702VVPdo you7703PPyou have7704VHPhave to7705TOto raise7706VVraise it7707PPit again7708RBagain in7709INin your7710PP$your view7711NNview ?7712SENT? Do7713VVdo you7714PPyou think7715VVthink that7716WDTthat 's7717VBZbe the7718DTthe best7719JJSgood reading7720NNreading of7721INof ...7722:... [MR. ALLEN]7723LOC[MR. ALLEN] I7724PPI do7725VVPdo n't7726RBn't think7727VVthink you7728PPyou have7729VHPhave to7730TOto raise7731VVraise anything7732NNanything again7733RBagain .7734SENT. I7735PPI ...7736:... I7737PPI think7738VVPthink that7739IN/thatthat would7740MDwould be7741VBbe an7742DTan unreasonable7743JJunreasonable reading7744NNreading of7745INof Rule7746NPRule 517747CD@card@ .7748SENT. I7749PPI think7750VVPthink you7751PPyou just7752RBjust have7753VHhave to7754TOto preserve7755VVpreserve them7756PPthem at7757INat some7758DTsome point7759NNpoint during7760INduring the7761DTthe entire7762JJentire process7763NNprocess .7764SENT. So7765RBso you7766PPyou do7767VVPdo n't7768RBn't have7769VHhave to7770TOto repeat7771VVrepeat arguments7772NNSargument you7773PPyou might7774MDmight have7775VHhave raised7776VVNraise in7777INin a7778DTa presentencing7779NNpresentencing memo7780NNmemo or7781CCor raised7782VVDraise earlier7783RBRearlier in7784INin the7785DTthe proceeding7786NNproceeding .7787SENT. I7788PPI just7789RBjust think7790VVPthink you7791PPyou have7792VHPhave to7793TOto apprise7794VVapprise the7795DTthe court7796NNcourt at7797INat some7798DTsome point7799NNpoint that7800IN/thatthat the7801DTthe sentence7802NNsentence that7803WDTthat 's7804VBZbe imposed7805VVNimpose is7806VBZbe outside7807INoutside the7808DTthe range7809NNrange of7810INof permissible7811JJpermissible sentences7812NNSsentence it7813PPit could7814MDcould impose7815VVimpose and7816CCand explain7817VVexplain why7818WRBwhy and7819CCand explain7820VVexplain ...7821:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7822LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Do7823VVPdo you7824PPyou think7825VVPthink there7826EXthere 's7827VBZbe a7828DTa lot7829NNlot of7830INof daylight7831NNdaylight between7832INbetween your7833PP$your position7834NNposition and7835CCand what7836WPwhat the7837DTthe government7838NNgovernment has7839VHZhave been7840VBNbe saying7841VVGsay ?7842SENT? [MR. ALLEN]7843LOC[MR. ALLEN] The7844DTthe only7845JJonly daylight7846NNdaylight I7847PPI see7848VVPsee is7849VBZbe in7850INin the7851DTthe first7852JJfirst part7853NNpart of7854INof my7855PP$my rule7856NNrule .7857SENT. Remember7858VVremember ,7859,, my7860PP$my rule7861NNrule has7862VHZhave two7863CDtwo points7864NNSpoint :7865:: One7866CDOne is7867VBZbe you7868PPyou have7869VHPhave to7870TOto make7871VVmake the7872DTthe distinct7873JJdistinct legal7874JJlegal argument7875NNargument that7876IN/thatthat an7877DTan imposed7878VVNimpose sentence7879NNsentence is7880VBZbe beyond7881INbeyond the7882DTthe range7883NNrange of7884INof permissible7885JJpermissible choice7886NNchoice ;7887:; and7888CCand then7889RBthen two7890CDtwo is7891VBZbe you7892PPyou have7893VHPhave to7894TOto state7895VVstate the7896DTthe facts7897NNSfact and7898CCand circumstances7899NNScircumstance .7900SENT. The7901DTthe government7902NNgovernment agrees7903VVZagree with7904INwith part7905NNpart 27906CD2 .7907SENT. So7908RBso really7909RBreally all7910RBall it7911PPit is7912VBZbe ,7913,, I7914PPI think7915VVPthink ,7916,, is7917VBZbe my7918PP$my requirement7919NNrequirement to7920TOto require7921VVrequire some7922DTsome more7923JJRmore specificity7924NNspecificity that7925IN/thatthat ,7926,, hey7927UHhey ,7928,, I7929PPI 'm7930VBPbe raising7931VVGraise the7932DTthe grounds7933NNSground for7934INfor a7935DTa substantive7936JJsubstantive reasonableness7937NNreasonableness argument7938NNargument as7939RBas opposed7940VVDoppose to7941TOto just7942RBjust simply7943RBsimply asking7944VVGask for7945INfor a7946DTa shorter7947JJRshort sentence7948NNsentence .7949SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7950LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] So7951RBso if7952INif ...7953:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7954LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And7955CCand you7956PPyou ...7957:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]7958LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Please7959RBplease .7960SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7961LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Go7962NPGo ahead7963RBahead .7964SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7965LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] No7966NPNo ,7967,, go7968VVPgo ahead7969RBahead .7970SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]7971LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Go7972NPGo ahead7973RBahead .7974SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]7975LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] This7976DTthis outside7977INoutside the7978DTthe range7979NNrange ,7980,, where7981WRBwhere ...7982:... where7983WRBwhere do7984VVPdo you7985PPyou think7986VVPthink that7987IN/thatthat that7988WDTthat comes7989VVZcome from7990INfrom ?7991SENT? Because7992INbecause it7993PPit seems7994VVZseem to7995TOto me7996PPme that7997IN/thatthat that7998WDTthat comes7999VVZcome from8000INfrom the8001DTthe reasonableness8002NNreasonableness ,8003,, the8004DTthe substantive8005JJsubstantive reasonableness8006NNreasonableness standard8007NNstandard ,8008,, which8009WDTwhich is8010VBZbe an8011DTan appellate8012JJappellate standard8013NNstandard .8014SENT. 35538015CD@card@ ,8016,, which8017WDTwhich is8018VBZbe the8019DTthe statute8020NNstatute that8021WDTthat 's8022VBZbe directed8023VVNdirect to8024TOto the8025DTthe trial8026NNtrial judge8027NNjudge ,8028,, does8029VVZdo n't8030RBn't talk8031VVtalk about8032INabout ranges8033NNSrange .8034SENT. To8035TOTo the8036DTthe contrary8037NNcontrary ,8038,, it8039PPit talks8040VVZtalk about8041RBabout ,8042,, you8043PPyou know8044VVPknow ,8045,, there8046EXthere 's8047VBZbe a8048DTa particular8049JJparticular point8050NNpoint .8051SENT. And8052CCand ,8053,, of8054INof course8055NNcourse ,8056,, your8057PP$your particular8058JJparticular point8059NNpoint ,8060,, your8061PP$your particular8062JJparticular sentence8063NNsentence might8064MDmight be8065VBbe different8066JJdifferent from8067INfrom somebody8068NNsomebody else8069RBelse 's8070POS's particular8071JJparticular point8072NNpoint and8073CCand particular8074JJparticular sentence8075NNsentence ,8076,, and8077CCand the8078DTthe appellate8079JJappellate court8080NNcourt can8081MDcan say8082VVsay ,8083,, you8084PPyou know8085VVPknow ,8086,, both8087CCboth of8088INof those8089DTthose are8090VBPbe within8091INwithin the8092DTthe range8093NNrange of8094INof reasonableness8095NNreasonableness .8096SENT. But8097CCbut the8098DTthe range8099NNrange seems8100VVZseem a8101DTa task8102NNtask for8103INfor the8104DTthe appellate8105JJappellate court8106NNcourt and8107CCand not8108RBnot for8109INfor the8110DTthe district8111NNdistrict court8112NNcourt .8113SENT. [MR. ALLEN]8114LOC[MR. ALLEN] Well8115UHWell ,8116,, so8117RBso the8118DTthe way8119NNway I8120PPI read8121VVPread this8122DTthis Court8123NPCourt 's8124POS's decisions8125NNSdecision in8126INin Rita8127NPRita ,8128,, Booker8129NPBooker ,8130,, and8131CCand Gall8132NPGall ,8133,, that8134WDTthat they8135PPthey all8136RBall emphasize8137VVPemphasize the8138DTthe extraordinary8139JJextraordinary amount8140NNamount of8141INof discretion8142NNdiscretion that8143IN/thatthat courts8144NNScourt of8145INof ...8146:... that8147IN/thatthat district8148NNdistrict courts8149NNScourt have8150VHPhave in8151INin sentencing8152NNsentencing .8153SENT. And8154CCand I8155PPI guess8156VVPguess ,8157,, Justice8158NPJustice Kagan8159NPKagan ,8160,, I8161PPI have8162VHPhave trouble8163NNtrouble envisioning8164VVGenvision ,8165,, kind8166NNkind of8167INof imagining8168VVGimagine what8169WPwhat that8170DTthat discretion8171NNdiscretion is8172VBZbe if8173INif it8174PPit 's8175VBZbe not8176RBnot discretion8177NNdiscretion to8178TOto pick8179VVpick amongst8180INamongst a8181DTa number8182NNnumber of8183INof sentence8184NNsentence all8185RBall ...8186:... sentences8187NNSsentence ,8188,, all8189DTall of8190INof which8191WDTwhich are8192VBPbe sufficient8193JJsufficient but8194CCbut not8195RBnot greater8196JJRgreat than8197INthan necessary8198JJnecessary to8199TOto serve8200VVserve the8201DTthe sentencing8202NNsentencing purposes8203NNSpurpose .8204SENT. I8205PPI think8206VVPthink those8207DTthose decisions8208NNSdecision seem8209VVPseem to8210TOto recognize8211VVrecognize that8212IN/thatthat you8213PPyou could8214MDcould have8215VHhave the8216DTthe same8217JJsame defendant8218NNdefendant convicted8219VVNconvict of8220INof the8221DTthe same8222JJsame crime8223NNcrime presented8224VVDpresent to8225TOto three8226CDthree different8227JJdifferent district8228NNdistrict court8229NNcourt judges8230NNSjudge ,8231,, all8232DTall of8233INof whom8234WPwhom ...8235:... [JUSTICE KAGAN]8236LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] Let8237VVlet me8238PPme give8239VVgive ...8240:... [MR. ALLEN]8241LOC[MR. ALLEN] ...8242:... reach8243VVreach different8244JJdifferent sentences8245NNSsentence .8246SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]8247LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] ...8248:... you8249PPyou an8250DTan example8251NNexample from8252INfrom a8253DTa different8254JJdifferent context8255NNcontext ,8256,, and8257CCand it8258PPit 's8259VBZbe much8260JJmuch like8261INlike the8262DTthe one8263CDone that8264DTthat Ms8265NNMs .8266SENT. Turner8267NPTurner gave8268VVDgive .8269SENT. I8270PPI mean8271VVPmean ,8272,, suppose8273VVPsuppose we8274PPwe had8275VHDhave some8276DTsome decision8277NNdecision which8278WDTwhich is8279VBZbe subject8280JJsubject to8281TOto an8282DTan abuse8283NNabuse of8284INof discretion8285NNdiscretion standard8286NNstandard .8287SENT. What8288WPWhat we8289PPwe would8290MDwould n't8291RBn't want8292VVwant to8293TOto have8294VHhave happen8295VVhappen is8296VBZbe for8297INfor the8298DTthe trial8299NNtrial court8300NNcourt to8301TOto be8302VBbe making8303VVGmake that8304DTthat decision8305NNdecision and8306CCand saying8307VVGsay ,8308,, I8309PPI ...8310:... this8311DTthis is8312VBZbe ...8313:... is8314VBZbe this8315DTthis an8316DTan abuse8317NNabuse of8318INof discretion8319NNdiscretion ?8320SENT? No8321UHNo ,8322,, we8323PPwe would8324MDwould want8325VVwant the8326DTthe trial8327NNtrial court8328NNcourt to8329TOto be8330VBbe making8331VVGmake the8332DTthe best8333JJSgood decision8334NNdecision that8335IN/thatthat the8336DTthe court8337NNcourt can8338MDcan make8339VVmake and8340CCand then8341RBthen leave8342VVleave it8343PPit to8344TOto the8345DTthe appellate8346JJappellate court8347NNcourt to8348TOto make8349VVmake ...8350:... to8351TOto apply8352VVapply the8353DTthe abuse8354NNabuse of8355INof discretion8356NNdiscretion standard8357NNstandard .8358SENT. And8359CCand so8360RBso too8361RBtoo here8362RBhere ,8363,, why8364WRBwhy is8365VBZbe n't8366RBn't the8367DTthe directive8368NNdirective to8369TOto the8370DTthe trial8371NNtrial court8372NNcourt to8373TOto say8374VVsay :8375:: Pick8376VVpick the8377DTthe sentence8378NNsentence that8379WDTthat 's8380VBZbe the8381DTthe appropriate8382JJappropriate ...8383:... the8384DTthe single8385JJsingle appropriate8386JJappropriate sentence8387NNsentence you8388PPyou think8389VVPthink under8390INunder 35538391CD@card@ ,8392,, and8393CCand then8394RBthen it8395PPit 's8396VBZbe for8397INfor the8398DTthe appellate8399JJappellate court8400NNcourt to8401TOto say8402VVsay whether8403INwhether that8404WDTthat falls8405VVZfall within8406INwithin the8407DTthe range8408NNrange of8409INof reasonableness8410NNreasonableness ?8411SENT? [MR. ALLEN]8412LOC[MR. ALLEN] So8413INso I8414PPI ...8415:... I8416PPI ...8417:... I8418PPI want8419VVPwant to8420TOto be8421VBbe very8422RBvery clear8423JJclear .8424SENT. I8425PPI do8426VVPdo think8427VVthink it8428PPit 's8429VBZbe still8430RBstill the8431DTthe district8432NNdistrict court8433NNcourt 's8434POS's job8435NNjob to8436TOto pick8437VVpick the8438DTthe sentence8439NNsentence that8440WDTthat 's8441VBZbe sufficient8442JJsufficient but8443CCbut not8444RBnot greater8445JJRgreat than8446INthan necessary8447JJnecessary .8448SENT. And8449CCand I8450PPI ...8451:... I8452PPI do8453VVPdo n't8454RBn't think8455VVthink courts8456NNScourt should8457MDshould be8458VBbe thinking8459VVGthink about8460INabout this8461DTthis in8462INin terms8463NNSterm of8464INof what8465WPwhat 's8466VBZbe reasonable8467JJreasonable or8468CCor abuse8469NNabuse of8470INof discretion8471NNdiscretion .8472SENT. But8473CCbut I8474PPI do8475VVPdo think8476VVthink that8477DTthat ...8478:... that8479IN/thatthat we8480PPwe still8481RBstill want8482VVPwant to8483TOto require8484VVrequire parties8485NNSparty to8486TOto speak8487VVspeak up8488RPup and8489CCand object8490VVobject if8491INif they8492PPthey believe8493VVPbelieve that8494DTthat ...8495:... that8496IN/thatthat the8497DTthe sentence8498NNsentence the8499DTthe district8500NNdistrict court8501NNcourt has8502VHZhave imposed8503VVNimpose is8504VBZbe not8505RBnot just8506RBjust one8507CDone that8508WDTthat they8509PPthey disagree8510VVPdisagree with8511INwith but8512CCbut one8513CDone that8514WDTthat has8515VHZhave given8516VVNgive rise8517NNrise to8518TOto a8519DTa new8520JJnew argument8521NNargument that8522IN/thatthat they8523PPthey 're8524VBPbe going8525VVGgo to8526TOto make8527VVmake on8528INon appeal8529NNappeal ,8530,, which8531WDTwhich is8532VBZbe that8533IN/thatthat ,8534,, Your8535PP$your Honor8536NPHonor ,8537,, the8538DTthe sentence8539NNsentence is8540VBZbe not8541RBnot just8542RBjust one8543CDone that8544WDTthat I8545PPI think8546VVPthink is8547VBZbe an8548DTan exercise8549NNexercise of8550INof discretion8551NNdiscretion that8552IN/thatthat I8553PPI disagree8554VVPdisagree with8555INwith ;8556:; it8557PPit 's8558VBZbe one8559CDone that8560WDTthat 's8561VBZbe outside8562INoutside the8563DTthe range8564NNrange of8565INof discretion8566NNdiscretion that8567IN/thatthat I8568PPI think8569VVPthink this8570DTthis Court8571NPCourt has8572VHZhave in8573INin the8574DTthe ...8575:... in8576INin the8577DTthe first8578JJfirst instance8579NNinstance .8580SENT. [JUSTICE KAGAN]8581LOC[JUSTICE KAGAN] But8582CCbut there8583EXthere are8584VBPbe many8585JJmany examples8586NNSexample where8587WRBwhere that8588WDTthat might8589MDmight occur8590VVoccur ,8591,, you8592PPyou know8593VVPknow ,8594,, you8595PPyou ask8596VVPask the8597DTthe trial8598NNtrial court8599NNcourt to8600TOto do8601VVdo something8602NNsomething ,8603,, it8604PPit says8605VVZsay no8606RBno .8607SENT. And8608CCand then8609RBthen ,8610,, in8611INin all8612PDTall these8613DTthese non-sentencing8614JJnon-sentencing contexts8615NNScontext ,8616,, do8617VVPdo you8618PPyou have8619VHPhave to8620TOto say8621VVsay ,8622,, you8623PPyou know8624VVPknow ,8625,, Your8626PP$your Honor8627NPHonor ,8628,, not8629RBnot only8630RBonly is8631VBZbe that8632IN/thatthat not8633RBnot what8634WPwhat I8635PPI asked8636VVDask you8637PPyou to8638TOto do8639VVdo ,8640,, but8641CCbut it8642PPit 's8643VBZbe also8644RBalso an8645DTan abuse8646NNabuse of8647INof discretion8648NNdiscretion ?8649SENT? [MR. ALLEN]8650LOC[MR. ALLEN] The8651DTthe short8652JJshort answer8653NNanswer is8654VBZbe no8655UHno ,8656,, I8657PPI do8658VVPdo n't8659RBn't think8660VVthink so8661RBso in8662INin those8663DTthose other8664JJother contexts8665NNScontext .8666SENT. The8667DTthe longer8668JJRlong answer8669NNanswer is8670VBZbe I8671PPI do8672VVPdo think8673VVthink there8674EXthere are8675VBPbe some8676DTsome contexts8677NNScontext in8678INin which8679WDTwhich we8680PPwe do8681VVPdo require8682VVrequire something8683NNsomething similar8684JJsimilar to8685TOto what8686WPwhat I8687PPI 'm8688VBPbe asking8689VVGask for8690INfor here8691RBhere .8692SENT. Jury8693NNjury instructions8694NNSinstruction is8695VBZbe probably8696RBprobably the8697DTthe best8698JJSgood example8699NNexample ,8700,, because8701INbecause district8702NNdistrict court8703NNcourt judges8704NNSjudge do8705VVPdo have8706VHPhave discretion8707NNdiscretion in8708INin how8709WRBhow they8710PPthey shape8711VVPshape jury8712NNjury instructions8713NNSinstruction ,8714,, and8715CCand Rule8716NPRule 308717CD@card@ does8718VVZdo require8719VVrequire that8720IN/thatthat if8721INif you8722PPyou think8723VVPthink the8724DTthe district8725NNdistrict court8726NNcourt has8727VHZhave kind8728NNkind of8729INof gone8730VVNgo outside8731INoutside the8732DTthe bounds8733NNSbound of8734INof what8735WPwhat it8736PPit can8737MDcan do8738VVdo in8739INin the8740DTthe jury8741NNjury instruction8742NNinstruction context8743NNcontext ,8744,, you8745PPyou do8746VVPdo have8747VHhave to8748TOto apprise8749VVapprise the8750DTthe court8751NNcourt of8752INof that8753DTthat .8754SENT. I8755PPI think8756VVPthink sentencing8757NNsentencing should8758MDshould be8759VBbe a8760DTa ...8761:... a8762DTa context8763NNcontext in8764INin which8765WDTwhich we8766PPwe require8767VVPrequire something8768NNsomething similar8769JJsimilar to8770TOto that8771DTthat because8772INbecause of8773INof the8774DTthe parsimony8775NNparsimony principle8776NNprinciple in8777INin 35538778CD@card@ (8779(( a8780DTa )8781)) ,8782,, because8783INbecause of8784INof the8785DTthe ...8786:... the8787DTthe significance8788NNsignificance ...8789:... the8790DTthe ...8791:... the8792DTthe ...8793:... you8794PPyou know8795VVPknow ,8796,, the8797DTthe significant8798JJsignificant guided8799VVNguide nature8800NNnature of8801INof the8802DTthe court8803NNcourt 's8804POS's discretion8805NNdiscretion and8806CCand the8807DTthe obligation8808NNobligation ...8809:... special8810JJspecial obligation8811NNobligation the8812DTthe court8813NNcourt has8814VHZhave to8815TOto explain8816VVexplain its8817PP$its sentencing8818NNsentencing ...8819:... sentence8820NNsentence under8821INunder 258822CD@card@ 35538823CD@card@ (8824(( c8825LSc )8826)) .8827SENT. So8828INso the8829DTthe short8830JJshort answer8831NNanswer is8832VBZbe I8833PPI would8834MDwould not8835RBnot require8836VVrequire the8837DTthe same8838JJsame requirement8839NNrequirement in8840INin those8841DTthose other8842JJother contexts8843NNScontext .8844SENT. The8845DTthe reason8846NNreason we8847PPwe would8848MDwould ...8849:... I8850PPI think8851VVPthink we8852PPwe should8853MDshould require8854VVrequire it8855PPit here8856RBhere is8857VBZbe sentencing8858VVGsentence ...8859:... sentencing8860NNsentencing is8861VBZbe meaningfully8862RBmeaningfully different8863JJdifferent .8864SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8865LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Even8866RBeven ...8867:... under8868INunder the8869DTthe Fifth8870NPFifth Circu8871NPCircu it8872PPit 's8873VBZbe rule8874NNrule ,8875,, even8876RBeven if8877INif you8878PPyou do8879VVPdo n't8880RBn't object8881VVobject ,8882,, it8883PPit 's8884VBZbe going8885VVGgo to8886TOto be8887VBbe reviewed8888VVNreview for8889INfor plain8890JJplain error8891NNerror on8892INon appeal8893NNappeal .8894SENT. And8895CCand I8896PPI 'll8897MDwill ask8898VVask the8899DTthe same8900JJsame question8901NNquestion I8902PPI asked8903VVDask Ms8904NNMs .8905SENT. Ratner8906NPRatner ,8907,, which8908WDTwhich is8909VBZbe ,8910,, can8911MDcan you8912PPyou imagine8913VVimagine a8914DTa sentence8915NNsentence that8916WDTthat 's8917VBZbe substantively8918RBsubstantively unreasonable8919JJunreasonable but8920CCbut not8921RBnot plain8922JJplain error8923NNerror ?8924SENT? Because8925RBbecause ,8926,, usually8927RBusually ,8928,, when8929WRBwhen judges8930NNSjudge find8931VVPfind ...8932:... appellate8933JJappellate judges8934NNSjudge find8935VVPfind it8936PPit 's8937VBZbe substantively8938RBsubstantively unreasonable8939JJunreasonable ,8940,, they8941PPthey 're8942VBPbe saying8943VVGsay ,8944,, wow8945VVwow ,8946,, the8947DTthe district8948NNdistrict judge8949NNjudge really8950RBreally jumped8951VVDjump the8952DTthe rails8953NNSrail there8954RBthere .8955SENT. [MR. ALLEN]8956LOC[MR. ALLEN] Yeah8957NPYeah .8958SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]8959LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And8960CCand that8961IN/thatthat sounds8962NNSsound ...8963:... and8964CCand that8965DTthat 's8966VBZbe the8967DTthe common8968JJcommon reaction8969NNreaction that8970WDTthat ...8971:... to8972TOto a8973DTa sentence8974NNsentence that8975WDTthat is8976VBZbe found8977VVNfind substantively8978RBsubstantively unreasonable8979JJunreasonable ,8980,, and8981CCand that8982IN/thatthat sounds8983NNSsound like8984INlike plain8985JJplain error8986NNerror .8987SENT. [MR. ALLEN]8988LOC[MR. ALLEN] I8989PPI agree8990VVPagree with8991INwith Ms8992NNMs .8993SENT. Ratner8994NPRatner on8995INon this8996DTthis .8997SENT. I8998PPI ...8999:... I9000PPI ...9001:... I9002PPI think9003VVPthink there9004EXthere is9005VBZbe some9006DTsome daylight9007NNdaylight between9008INbetween plain9009JJplain error9010NNerror and9011CCand abuse9012NNabuse of9013INof discretion9014NNdiscretion ,9015,, probably9016RBprobably not9017RBnot much9018JJmuch .9019SENT. I9020PPI do9021VVPdo think9022VVthink many9023JJmany sentences9024NNSsentence that9025WDTthat are9026VBPbe deemed9027VVNdeem substantively9028RBsubstantively unreasonable9029JJunreasonable will9030MDwill like9031VVlike satisfy9032VVsatisfy plain9033JJplain error9034NNerror review9035NNreview .9036SENT. But9037CCbut I9038PPI do9039VVPdo n't9040RBn't think9041VVthink the9042DTthe ...9043:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9044LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] It9045PPit 's9046VBZbe exceedingly9047RBexceedingly rare9048JJrare for9049INfor an9050DTan appellate9051JJappellate court9052NNcourt to9053TOto find9054VVfind a9055DTa sentence9056NNsentence substantively9057RBsubstantively unreasonable9058JJunreasonable .9059SENT. [MR. ALLEN]9060LOC[MR. ALLEN] It9061PPit 's9062VBZbe exceedingly9063RBexceedingly rare9064JJrare .9065SENT. Yes9066UHyes ,9067,, Justice9068NPJustice Kavanaugh9069NPKavanaugh .9070SENT. But9071CCbut I9072PPI do9073VVPdo n't9074RBn't think9075VVthink that9076WDTthat 's9077VBZbe an9078DTan issue9079NNissue this9080DTthis Court9081NPCourt should9082MDshould prejudge9083VVprejudge because9084INbecause plain9085JJplain error9086NNerror review9087NNreview ,9088,, as9089INas this9090DTthis Court9091NPCourt has9092VHZhave said9093VVNsay ,9094,, is9095VBZbe a9096DTa very9097RBvery fact-intensive9098JJfact-intensive case-by-case9099JJcase-by-case determination9100NNdetermination ,9101,, and9102CCand so9103RBso I9104PPI do9105VVPdo n't9106RBn't think9107VVthink the9108DTthe Court9109NPCourt should9110MDshould just9111RBjust say9112VVsay ,9113,, well9114RBwell ,9115,, every9116DTevery substantively9117RBsubstantively unreasonable9118JJunreasonable sentence9119NNsentence will9120MDwill be9121VBbe plain9122JJplain error9123NNerror .9124SENT. It9125PPit might9126MDmight well9127RBwell turn9128VVturn out9129RPout to9130TOto be9131VBbe the9132DTthe case9133NNcase ...9134:... [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9135LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] Yeah9136NPYeah .9137SENT. [MR. ALLEN]9138LOC[MR. ALLEN] ...9139:... but9140CCbut I9141PPI do9142VVPdo n't9143RBn't think9144VVthink the9145DTthe Court9146NPCourt should9147MDshould prejudge9148VVprejudge that9149DTthat .9150SENT. And9151CCand just9152RBjust ...9153:... [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9154LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] By9155INby substantively9156RBsubstantively unreasonable9157JJunreasonable ,9158,, you9159PPyou mean9160VVPmean nothing9161NNnothing more9162JJRmore than9163INthan an9164DTan erroneous9165JJerroneous application9166NNapplication of9167INof the9168DTthe 35539169CD@card@ standards9170NNSstandard ,9171,, right9172RBright ?9173SENT? [MR. ALLEN]9174LOC[MR. ALLEN] Well9175UHWell ,9176,, correct9177JJcorrect ,9178,, Mr9179NPMr .9180SENT. Chief9181NPChief Justice9182NPJustice ,9183,, although9184INalthough it9185PPit would9186MDwould have9187VHhave to9188TOto be9189VBbe so9190RBso erroneous9191JJerroneous that9192IN/thatthat it9193PPit falls9194VVZfall outside9195INoutside the9196DTthe range9197NNrange of9198INof substantial9199JJsubstantial discretion9200NNdiscretion that9201IN/thatthat we9202PPwe understand9203VVPunderstand district9204NNdistrict courts9205NNScourt to9206TOto have9207VHhave at9208INat sentencing9209NNsentencing .9210SENT. So9211RBso it9212PPit 's9213VBZbe not9214RBnot just9215RBjust it9216PPit 's9217VBZbe wrong9218JJwrong .9219SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9220LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] And9221CCand the9222DTthe way9223NNway 49224CD4 it9225PPit 's9226VBZbe ...9227:... [MR. ALLEN]9228LOC[MR. ALLEN] It9229PPit 's9230VBZbe very9231RBvery wrong9232JJwrong .9233SENT. [JUSTICE KAVANAUGH]9234LOC[JUSTICE KAVANAUGH] ...9235:... the9236DTthe way9237NNway it9238PPit 's9239VBZbe articulated9240VVNarticulate in9241INin many9242JJmany of9243INof the9244DTthe appellate9245JJappellate courts9246NNScourt is9247VBZbe very9248RBvery deferentially9249RBdeferentially articulated9250VVNarticulate .9251SENT. [MR. ALLEN]9252LOC[MR. ALLEN] That9253DTthat 's9254VBZbe correct9255JJcorrect ,9256,, Justice9257NPJustice Kavanaugh9258NPKavanaugh .9259SENT. There9260EXthere 's9261VBZbe one9262CDone question9263NNquestion you9264PPyou asked9265VVDask that9266DTthat ...9267:... that9268IN/thatthat I9269PPI did9270VVDdo want9271VVwant to9272TOto address9273VVaddress .9274SENT. You9275PPyou asked9276VVDask the9277DTthe government9278NNgovernment of9279INof ...9280:... what9281WPwhat would9282MDwould happen9283VVhappen in9284INin a9285DTa situation9286NNsituation where9287WRBwhere we9288PPwe ...9289:... you9290PPyou have9291VHPhave some9292DTsome preserved9293VVNpreserve arguments9294NNSargument and9295CCand some9296DTsome unpreserved9297JJunpreserved arguments9298NNSargument and9299CCand some9300DTsome of9301INof which9302WDTwhich are9303VBPbe subject9304JJsubject to9305TOto plain9306JJplain error9307NNerror and9308CCand some9309DTsome of9310INof which9311WDTwhich subject9312JJsubject to9313TOto harmless9314JJharmless error9315NNerror review9316NNreview ,9317,, for9318INfor example9319NNexample .9320SENT. That9321DTthat does9322VVZdo come9323VVcome up9324RPup in9325INin other9326JJother circumstances9327NNScircumstance .9328SENT. We9329PPwe were9330VBDbe looking9331VVGlook into9332INinto this9333DTthis .9334SENT. It9335PPit ...9336:... it9337PPit comes9338VVZcome up9339RPup in9340INin cumulative9341JJcumulative error9342NNerror circumstance9343NNcircumstance where9344WRBwhere parties9345NNSparty are9346VBPbe arguing9347VVGargue cumulative9348JJcumulative error9349NNerror ,9350,, there9351EXthere were9352VBDbe a9353DTa number9354NNnumber of9355INof errors9356NNSerror below9357RBbelow ,9358,, some9359DTsome of9360INof which9361WDTwhich were9362VBDbe preserved9363VVNpreserve ,9364,, some9365DTsome of9366INof which9367WDTwhich were9368VBDbe not9369RBnot .9370SENT. It9371PPit can9372MDcan come9373VVcome up9374RPup in9375INin the9376DTthe ineffective9377JJineffective assistance9378NNassistance of9379INof counsel9380NNcounsel area9381NNarea ,9382,, where9383WRBwhere you9384PPyou argue9385VVPargue that9386IN/thatthat counsel9387NNcounsel was9388VBDbe ineffective9389JJineffective for9390INfor some9391DTsome reasons9392NNSreason but9393CCbut not9394RBnot others9395NNSother .9396SENT. The9397DTthe short9398JJshort answer9399NNanswer is9400VBZbe it9401PPit 's9402VBZbe ...9403:... it9404PPit can9405MDcan be9406VBbe difficult9407JJdifficult ,9408,, but9409CCbut courts9410NNScourt of9411INof appeals9412NNSappeal have9413VHPhave found9414VVNfind ways9415NNSway to9416TOto deal9417VVdeal with9418INwith it9419PPit .9420SENT. And9421CCand the9422DTthe way9423NNway they9424PPthey do9425VVPdo it9426PPit is9427VBZbe typically9428RBtypically what9429WPwhat Ms9430NNMs .9431SENT. Ratner9432NPRatner said9433VVDsay ,9434,, they9435PPthey start9436VVPstart by9437INby looking9438VVGlook at9439INat the9440DTthe preserved9441VVNpreserve errors9442NNSerror ,9443,, sort9444NNsort through9445INthrough those9446DTthose to9447TOto see9448VVsee whether9449INwhether there9450EXthere 's9451VBZbe any9452DTany grounds9453NNSground to9454TOto reverse9455VVreverse on9456INon that9457DTthat ,9458,, and9459CCand then9460RBthen go9461VVgo to9462TOto the9463DTthe ...9464:... to9465TOto the9466DTthe unpreserved9467JJunpreserved errors9468NNSerror .9469SENT. But9470CCbut I9471PPI guess9472VVPguess the9473DTthe point9474NNpoint I9475PPI would9476MDwould make9477VVmake is9478VBZbe courts9479NNScourt of9480INof appeals9481NNSappeal have9482VHPhave found9483VVNfind a9484DTa way9485NNway to9486TOto deal9487VVdeal with9488INwith it9489PPit .9490SENT. They9491PPthey have9492VHPhave n't9493RBn't just9494RBjust said9495VVDsay ,9496,, oh9497UHoh ,9498,, just9499RBjust because9500INbecause ...9501:... you9502PPyou know9503VVPknow ,9504,, because9505INbecause we9506PPwe have9507VHPhave this9508DTthis problem9509NNproblem ,9510,, we9511PPwe 're9512VBPbe just9513RBjust going9514VVGgo to9515TOto assume9516VVassume everything9517NNeverything is9518VBZbe preserved9519VVNpreserve and9520CCand ...9521:... and9522CCand go9523VVgo on9524INon to9525TOto ...9526:... to9527TOto consider9528VVconsider it9529PPit .9530SENT. A9531DTa couple9532NNcouple more9533JJRmore points9534NNSpoint ,9535,, Mr9536NPMr .9537SENT. Chief9538NPChief Justice9539NPJustice .9540SENT. One9541CDOne thing9542NNthing this9543DTthis Court9544NPCourt had9545VHDhave said9546VVNsay in9547INin Gall9548NPGall I9549PPI think9550VVPthink is9551VBZbe helpful9552JJhelpful in9553INin thinking9554VVGthink about9555INabout this9556DTthis .9557SENT. This9558DTthis Court9559NPCourt said9560VVDsay in9561INin Gall9562NPGall that9563IN/thatthat if9564INif a9565DTa district9566NNdistrict court9567NNcourt judge9568NNjudge determines9569VVZdetermine that9570IN/thatthat an9571DTan outside9572JJoutside guideline9573NNguideline sentence9574NNsentence is9575VBZbe warranted9576VVNwarrant ,9577,, he9578PPhe must9579MDmust "9580``" consider9581VVconsider the9582DTthe extent9583NNextent of9584INof the9585DTthe deviation9586NNdeviation and9587CCand ensure9588VVensure that9589IN/thatthat the9590DTthe justification9591NNjustification is9592VBZbe sufficiently9593RBsufficiently compelling9594JJcompelling to9595TOto support9596VVsupport the9597DTthe degree9598NNdegree of9599INof the9600DTthe variance9601NNvariance .9602SENT. "9603''" Well9604UHwell ,9605,, I9606PPI think9607VVPthink ,9608,, in9609INin most9610JJSmost cases9611NNScase ,9612,, you9613PPyou won9614MDwill 't9615RB't know9616VVknow whether9617INwhether the9618DTthe district9619NNdistrict court9620NNcourt 's9621POS's justification9622NNjustification is9623VBZbe sufficiently9624RBsufficiently compelling9625JJcompelling until9626INuntil you9627PPyou hear9628VVPhear the9629DTthe court9630NNcourt 's9631POS's sentence9632NNsentence and9633CCand the9634DTthe reasons9635NNSreason for9636INfor it9637PPit .9638SENT. It9639PPit 's9640VBZbe only9641RBonly then9642RBthen whether9643INwhether you9644PPyou can9645MDcan assess9646VVassess whether9647INwhether the9648DTthe justifications9649NNSjustification are9650VBPbe sufficient9651JJsufficient to9652TOto support9653VVsupport the9654DTthe unusually9655RBunusually harsh9656JJharsh or9657CCor unusually9658RBunusually lenient9659JJlenient sentence9660NNsentence .9661SENT. And9662CCand if9663INif it9664PPit 's9665VBZbe not9666RBnot ,9667,, I9668PPI ...9669:... I9670PPI think9671VVPthink it9672PPit 's9673VBZbe reasonable9674JJreasonable ,9675,, I9676PPI think9677VVPthink ,9678,, to9679TOto require9680VVrequire a9681DTa party9682NNparty to9683TOto object9684VVobject and9685CCand explain9686VVexplain to9687TOto the9688DTthe court9689NNcourt why9690WRBwhy that9691DTthat 's9692VBZbe true9693JJtrue .9694SENT. And9695CCand I9696PPI think9697VVPthink that9698WDTthat 's9699VBZbe something9700NNsomething that9701IN/thatthat Rule9702NPRule 519703CD@card@ reasonably9704RBreasonably requires9705VVZrequire in9706RPin ...9707:... in9708INin asking9709VVGask parties9710NNSparty to9711TOto preserve9712VVpreserve their9713PP$their grounds9714NNSground for9715INfor the9716DTthe argument9717NNargument .9718SENT. If9719INif there9720EXthere are9721VBPbe no9722RBno further9723JJRfurther questions9724NNSquestion ,9725,, let9726VVlet me9727PPme leave9728VVleave the9729DTthe Court9730NPCourt with9731INwith one9732CDone final9733JJfinal thought9734NNthought in9735INin thinking9736VVGthink about9737INabout this9738DTthis case9739NNcase .9740SENT. I9741PPI think9742VVPthink it9743PPit 's9744VBZbe beneficial9745JJbeneficial to9746TOto consider9747VVconsider not9748RBnot the9749DTthe run-of-the-mill9750JJrun-of-the-mill sentencing9751NNsentencing case9752NNcase but9753CCbut the9754DTthe sentencing9755NNsentencing proceeding9756NNproceeding in9757INin which9758WDTwhich a9759DTa ...9760:... a9761DTa substantive9762JJsubstantive reasonableness9763NNreasonableness argument9764NNargument is9765VBZbe likely9766JJlikely to9767TOto have9768VHhave the9769DTthe most9770JJSmost viability9771NNviability .9772SENT. And9773CCand that9774DTthat 's9775VBZbe when9776WRBwhen an9777DTan imposed9778VVNimpose sentence9779NNsentence differs9780VVZdiffer dramatically9781RBdramatically from9782INfrom the9783DTthe guidelines9784NNSguideline range9785NNrange and9786CCand likely9787RBlikely the9788DTthe sentence9789NNsentence that9790IN/thatthat the9791DTthe parties9792NNSparty have9793VHPhave been9794VBNbe advocating9795VVGadvocate before9796INbefore it9797PPit .9798SENT. In9799INin that9800DTthat circumstance9801NNcircumstance ,9802,, I9803PPI think9804VVPthink it9805PPit 's9806VBZbe important9807JJimportant to9808TOto craft9809VVcraft a9810DTa rule9811NNrule that9812WDTthat asks9813VVZask the9814DTthe parties9815NNSparty to9816TOto engage9817VVengage with9818INwith the9819DTthe district9820NNdistrict court9821NNcourt about9822INabout the9823DTthe sentence9824NNsentence it9825PPit imposed9826VVDimpose and9827CCand the9828DTthe reasons9829NNSreason that9830IN/thatthat it9831PPit gave9832VVDgive for9833INfor doing9834VVGdo so9835RBso .9836SENT. Otherwise9837RBotherwise ,9838,, courts9839NNScourt of9840INof appeals9841NNSappeal will9842MDwill have9843VHhave to9844TOto address9845VVaddress that9846DTthat ...9847:... that9848DTthat ...9849:... address9850VVaddress those9851DTthose issues9852NNSissue in9853INin the9854DTthe first9855JJfirst instance9856NNinstance .9857SENT. The9858DTthe better9859JJRgood rule9860NNrule ,9861,, I9862PPI think9863VVPthink ,9864,, is9865VBZbe if9866INif a9867DTa party9868NNparty believes9869VVZbelieve that9870IN/thatthat an9871DTan imposed9872VVNimpose sentence9873NNsentence is9874VBZbe so9875RBso excessive9876JJexcessive that9877IN/thatthat it9878PPit 's9879VBZbe beyond9880INbeyond the9881DTthe range9882NNrange of9883INof choice9884NNchoice that9885IN/thatthat 35539886CD@card@ (9887(( a9888DTa )9889)) allows9890VVZallow ,9891,, they9892PPthey should9893MDshould make9894VVmake that9895DTthat specific9896JJspecific argument9897NNargument to9898TOto the9899DTthe district9900NNdistrict court9901NNcourt and9902CCand identify9903VVidentify the9904DTthe facts9905NNSfact and9906CCand circumstances9907NNScircumstance supporting9908VVGsupport it9909PPit .9910SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]9911LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank9912VVthank you9913PPyou ,9914,, counsel9915NNcounsel .9916SENT. Two9917CDTwo minutes9918NNSminute ,9919,, Ms9920NNMs .9921SENT. Ratner9922NPRatner .9923SENT. I9924PPI 'm9925VBPbe sorry9926JJsorry ,9927,, Ms9928NNMs .9929SENT. Turner9930NPTurner .9931SENT.

[MS. TURNER]9932LOC[MS. TURNER] Thank9933VVthank you9934PPyou ,9935,, Mr9936NPMr .9937SENT. Chief9938NPChief Justice9939NPJustice .9940SENT. The9941DTthe amicus9942NNamicus 's9943POS's test9944NNtest is9945VBZbe trying9946VVGtry to9947TOto fix9948VVfix a9949DTa problem9950NNproblem that9951WDTthat does9952VVZdo not9953RBnot exist9954VVexist .9955SENT. Nine9956CDNine courts9957NNScourt of9958INof appeals9959NNSappeal show9960VVPshow that9961IN/thatthat the9962DTthe Fifth9963NPFifth Circu9964NPCircu it9965PPit 's9966POS's rule9967NNrule is9968VBZbe not9969RBnot necessary9970JJnecessary to9971TOto the9972DTthe effective9973JJeffective functioning9974NNfunctioning of9975INof courts9976NNScourt .9977SENT. Not9978RBnot only9979RBonly is9980VBZbe it9981PPit not9982RBnot necessary9983JJnecessary to9984TOto the9985DTthe effective9986JJeffective functioning9987NNfunctioning of9988INof courts9989NNScourt ,9990,, it9991PPit is9992VBZbe inconsistent9993JJinconsistent with9994INwith Rule9995NPRule 519996CD@card@ in9997INin two9998CDtwo ways9999NNSway .10000SENT. First10001NPFirst is10002VBZbe insofar10003RBinsofar as10004INas it10005PPit requires10006VVZrequire a10007DTa post-sentencing10008NNpost-sentencing objection10009NNobjection that10010WDTthat is10011VBZbe inconsistent10012JJinconsistent with10013INwith both10014DTboth part10015NNpart (10016(( a10017DTa )10018)) and10019CCand part10020VVpart (10021(( b10022LSb )10023)) of10024INof the10025DTthe rule10026NNrule ,10027,, which10028WDTwhich express10029VVPexpress ...10030:... part10031VVpart (10032(( b10033LSb )10034)) expressly10035RBexpressly makes10036VVZmake clear10037JJclear that10038IN/thatthat exceptions10039NNSexception are10040VBPbe not10041RBnot required10042VVNrequire .10043SENT. Second10044RBsecond ,10045,, to10046TOto frame10047VVframe the10048DTthe argument10049NNargument in10050INin terms10051NNSterm of10052INof substantive10053JJsubstantive reasonableness10054NNreasonableness or10055CCor the10056DTthe other10057JJother articulations10058NNSarticulation that10059IN/thatthat my10060PP$my friend10061NNfriend used10062VVDuse ,10063,, outside10064INoutside the10065DTthe range10066NNrange of10067INof reasonableness10068NNreasonableness ,10069,, abuse10070NNabuse of10071INof discretion10072NNdiscretion ,10073,, that10074WDTthat 's10075VBZbe just10076RBjust the10077DTthe appellate10078JJappellate standard10079NNstandard of10080INof review10081NNreview .10082SENT. And10083CCand there10084EXthere is10085VBZbe no10086DTno need10087NNneed to10088TOto frame10089VVframe objections10090NNSobjection in10091INin district10092NNdistrict court10093NNcourt in10094INin terms10095NNSterm ...10096:... in10097INin those10098DTthose terms10099NNSterm .10100SENT. And10101CCand ,10102,, second10103RBsecond ,10104,, Rule10105NPRule 5110106CD@card@ just10107RBjust says10108VVZsay that10109IN/thatthat parties10110NNSparty are10111VBPbe required10112VVNrequire to10113TOto tell10114VVtell the10115DTthe court10116NNcourt what10117WDTwhat action10118NNaction the10119DTthe party10120NNparty wants10121VVZwant the10122DTthe court10123NNcourt to10124TOto take10125VVtake .10126SENT. This10127DTthis facts-and-circumstances10128NNSfacts-and-circumstances argument10129NNargument is10130VBZbe ,10131,, as10132INas Justice10133NPJustice Kagan10134NPKagan remarked10135VVDremark ,10136,, outside10137INoutside the10138DTthe question10139NNquestion presented10140VVDpresent .10141SENT. But10142CCbut just10143RBjust to10144TOto briefly10145RBbriefly say10146VVsay a10147DTa few10148JJfew things10149NNSthing ,10150,, all10151RBall we10152PPwe are10153VBPbe asking10154VVGask this10155DTthis Court10156NPCourt to10157TOto do10158VVdo is10159VBZbe to10160TOto leave10161VVleave it10162PPit to10163TOto ...10164:... to10165TOto lower10166JJRlow courts10167NNScourt to10168TOto apply10169VVapply the10170DTthe same10171JJsame fair10172JJfair notice10173NNnotice standard10174NNstandard that10175IN/thatthat they10176PPthey apply10177VVPapply in10178INin other10179JJother contexts10180NNScontext in10181INin this10182DTthis context10183NNcontext ,10184,, and10185CCand the10186DTthe grounds10187NNSground language10188NNlanguage that10189IN/thatthat my10190PP$my friend10191NNfriend is10192VBZbe relying10193VVGrely on10194INon is10195VBZbe not10196RBnot found10197VVNfind anywhere10198RBanywhere in10199INin Rule10200NPRule 5110201CD@card@ .10202SENT. It10203PPit is10204VBZbe only10205JJonly ...10206:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10207LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Where10208WRBwhere do10209VVPdo you10210PPyou disagree10211VVPdisagree with10212INwith the10213DTthe government10214NNgovernment ?10215SENT? Where10216WRBwhere do10217VVPdo you10218PPyou disagree10219VVPdisagree with10220INwith the10221DTthe government10222NNgovernment ?10223SENT? [MS. TURNER]10224LOC[MS. TURNER] The10225NPThe ...10226:... well10227UHwell ,10228,, I10229PPI think10230VVPthink the10231DTthe government10232NNgovernment 's10233POS's position10234NNposition and10235CCand our10236PP$our position10237NNposition is10238VBZbe ...10239:... are10240VBPbe very10241RBvery close10242JJclose .10243SENT. I10244PPI think10245VVPthink ...10246:... [JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR]10247LOC[JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR] Where10248WRBwhere is10249VBZbe the10250DTthe window10251NNwindow where10252WRBwhere it10253PPit 's10254VBZbe not10255RBnot ?10256SENT? [MS. TURNER]10257LOC[MS. TURNER] Where10258WRBwhere we10259PPwe might10260MDmight disagree10261VVdisagree is10262VBZbe about10263RBabout when10264WRBwhen arguments10265NNSargument are10266VBPbe preserved10267VVNpreserve ,10268,, when10269WRBwhen a10270DTa district10271NNdistrict court10272NNcourt has10273VHZhave fair10274JJfair notice10275NNnotice .10276SENT. I10277PPI think10278VVPthink we10279PPwe both10280DTboth agree10281VVPagree that10282IN/thatthat the10283DTthe fair10284JJfair notice10285NNnotice standard10286NNstandard applies10287VVZapply ,10288,, but10289CCbut we10290PPwe might10291MDmight find10292VVfind more10293JJRmore arguments10294NNSargument ...10295:... that10296IN/thatthat the10297DTthe district10298NNdistrict court10299NNcourt had10300VHDhave more10301JJRmore ...10302:... had10303VHDhave fair10304JJfair notice10305NNnotice of10306INof more10307JJRmore arguments10308NNSargument than10309INthan the10310DTthe ...10311:... than10312INthan the10313DTthe government10314NNgovernment is10315VBZbe willing10316JJwilling to10317TOto concede10318VVconcede .10319SENT. So10320RBso ,10321,, for10322INfor example10323NNexample ,10324,, here10325RBhere ,10326,, I10327PPI think10328VVPthink they10329PPthey ...10330:... they10331PPthey are10332VBPbe not10333RBnot ...10334:... do10335VVPdo n't10336RBn't expressly10337RBexpressly address10338VVaddress the10339DTthe public10340JJpublic dangerousness10341NNdangerousness argument10342NNargument that10343IN/thatthat we10344PPwe raised10345VVDraise below10346RBbelow .10347SENT. But10348CCbut that10349DTthat 's10350VBZbe an10351DTan area10352NNarea where10353WRBwhere we10354PPwe disagree10355VVPdisagree .10356SENT. But10357CCbut ,10358,, as10359INas I10360PPI was10361VBDbe saying10362VVGsay ,10363,, in10364INin Rule10365NPRule 4610366CD@card@ ,10367,, there10368EXthere is10369VBZbe this10370DTthis grounds10371NNSground language10372NNlanguage .10373SENT. It10374PPit is10375VBZbe not10376RBnot present10377JJpresent in10378INin Rule10379NPRule 5110380CD@card@ ,10381,, and10382CCand Rule10383NPRule 5110384CD@card@ postdates10385VVZpostdate Rule10386NPRule 4610387CD@card@ .10388SENT. So10389INso the10390DTthe rule10391NNrule enactors10392NNSenactors clearly10393RBclearly knew10394VVDknow how10395WRBhow to10396TOto require10397VVrequire that10398IN/thatthat if10399INif they10400PPthey wanted10401VVDwant to10402TOto .10403SENT. But10404CCbut even10405RBeven if10406INif you10407PPyou think10408VVPthink there10409EXthere is10410VBZbe some10411DTsome sort10412NNsort of10413INof grounds10414NNSground requirement10415NNrequirement in10416INin Rule10417NPRule 5110418CD@card@ that10419WDTthat 's10420VBZbe sort10421NNsort of10422INof implied10423VVNimply ,10424,, all10425PDTall that10426DTthat means10427NNmeans is10428VBZbe that10429IN/thatthat the10430DTthe party10431NNparty needs10432VVZneed to10433TOto preserve10434VVpreserve the10435DTthe legal10436JJlegal grounds10437NNSground on10438INon which10439WDTwhich they10440PPthey are10441VBPbe relying10442VVGrely .10443SENT. It10444PPit does10445VVZdo not10446RBnot mean10447VVmean they10448PPthey have10449VHPhave to10450TOto preserve10451VVpreserve every10452DTevery fact10453NNfact and10454CCand circumstance10455NNcircumstance .10456SENT. Finally10457RBfinally ,10458,, as10459INas I10460PPI mentioned10461VVDmention earlier10462RBRearlier in10463INin response10464NNresponse to10465TOto Justice10466NPJustice Sotomayor10467NPSotomayor 's10468POS's questions10469NNSquestion ,10470,, this10471DTthis facts-and-circumstances10472NNSfacts-and-circumstances test10473NNtest would10474MDwould mire10475VVmire the10476DTthe courts10477NNScourt in10478INin very10479RBvery fact-bound10480JJfact-bound disputes10481NNSdispute .10482SENT. Thank10483VVthank you10484PPyou .10485SENT. [CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS]10486LOC[CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS] Thank10487VVthank you10488PPyou ,10489,, counsel10490NNcounsel .10491SENT. Mr10492NPMr .10493SENT. Allen10494NPAllen ,10495,, this10496DTthis Court10497NPCourt appointed10498VVDappoint you10499PPyou to10500TOto brief10501VVbrief and10502CCand argue10503VVargue this10504DTthis case10505NNcase as10506INas an10507DTan amicus10508NNamicus curiae10509NNScuria in10510INin support10511NNsupport of10512INof the10513DTthe judgment10514NNjudgment below10515RBbelow .10516SENT. You10517PPyou have10518VHPhave ably10519RBably discharged10520VVNdischarge that10521DTthat responsibility10522NNresponsibility ,10523,, for10524INfor which10525WDTwhich we10526PPwe are10527VBPbe grateful10528JJgrateful .10529SENT. The10530DTthe case10531NNcase is10532VBZbe submitted10533VVNsubmit .10534SENT.