|
Data-Driven Reduced-Order Model for Atmospheric CO 2Dispersion |
|
Pedro R. B. Rocha,1,2Marcos S. P. Gomes,2Jo˜ao L. S. Almeida,1 |
|
Allan M. Carvalho,1Alberto C. Nogueira Jr.1 |
|
1IBM Research Brazil, |
|
2Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro |
|
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], |
|
[email protected], [email protected] |
|
Abstract |
|
Machine learning frameworks have emerged as powerful |
|
tools for the enhancement of computational fluid dynam- |
|
ics simulations and the construction of reduced-order mod- |
|
els (ROMs). The latter are particularly desired when their |
|
full-order counterparts portray multiple spatiotemporal fea- |
|
tures and demand high processing power and storage capac- |
|
ity, such as climate models. In this work, a ROM for CO 2 |
|
dispersion across Earth‘s atmosphere was built from NASA’s |
|
gridded daily OCO-2 carbon dioxide assimilated dataset. For |
|
that, a proper orthogonal decomposition was performed, fol- |
|
lowed by a non-intrusive operator inference (OpInf). This sci- |
|
entific machine learning technique was capable of accurately |
|
representing and predicting the detailed CO 2concentration |
|
field for about one year ahead, with a normalized root-mean- |
|
square error below 5%. It suggests OpInf-based ROMs may |
|
be a reliable alternative for fast response climate-related pre- |
|
dictions. |
|
Introduction |
|
Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) algorithms, |
|
which blend data-driven modeling with information about |
|
the physics, have been widely employed for improving spa- |
|
tiotemporal forecasts in the Earth and climate sciences (Re- |
|
ichstein et al. 2019; Schneider, Jeevanjee, and Socolow |
|
2021; Cort ´es-Andr ´es et al. 2022; Willard et al. 2022; |
|
Kashinath et al. 2021). Since purely data-driven machine |
|
learning (ML) models are not often generalizable beyond |
|
the training interval due to their misspecification or data dis- |
|
tribution shifts, violating fundamental principles, additional |
|
constraints are required. By incorporating physical laws on |
|
the ML model, it has a considerable gain in performance |
|
and robustness, becoming more reliable, generalizable and |
|
explainable. |
|
One of the primary goals within the PIML field is to |
|
build reduced-order models (ROMs) for dynamical systems, |
|
which are more computationally efficient than their full- |
|
order counterparts in spite of possibly being less precise |
|
(Willard et al. 2022). In general, these models are suitable |
|
in control, optimization and uncertainty quantification prob- |
|
lems, where multiple high-fidelity numerical simulations are |
|
Copyright © 2022, Association for the Advancement of Artificial |
|
Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.needed. Regarding the climate sciences, building ROMs be- |
|
comes notably challenging due to the Earth system’s broad |
|
range of scales in space and time and to computational lim- |
|
itations imposed by its very high number of degrees of free- |
|
dom. It is worth mentioning that, when considering state |
|
variables defined mainly by small-scale processes, it is of |
|
paramount importance to downscale them to a finer reso- |
|
lution before proceeding to the dimensionality reduction, |
|
when many features of the system are inevitably lost. |
|
In the last decade, it was developed a data-driven reduced- |
|
order modeling framework based on a non-intrusive opera- |
|
tor inference (OpInf) (Peherstorfer and Willcox 2016). This |
|
method postulates the shape for the ROM operators based on |
|
the knowledge that most physical equations, including those |
|
related to fluid flows, are second-order nonlinear. Besides, |
|
since OpInf only relies on spatiotemporal data provided by |
|
high-fidelity simulations or experimental measurements, it is |
|
quite straightforward to be employed in a myriad of dynam- |
|
ical systems to leverage new scientific discoveries. In addi- |
|
tion to that, it is computationally more efficient and robust |
|
than conventional deep learning techniques, such as echo- |
|
state networks (Nogueira Jr et al. 2021), since it requires |
|
a much lower number of hyperparameters to be tuned and |
|
has a better extrapolation capability. Recently, it was suc- |
|
cessfully applied in a complex multiscale combustion prob- |
|
lem (Swischuk et al. 2020; McQuarrie, Huang, and Willcox |
|
2021). |
|
In this work, to further explore the potential of the OpInf |
|
in the field of climate sciences, the gridded daily OCO-2 car- |
|
bon dioxide assimilated dataset (Weir and Ott 2022), which |
|
contains the CO 2concentration field around the Earth, was |
|
considered. The main goal was to obtain a reliable OpInf- |
|
based ROM for this field and compare it with the original |
|
dataset. To reduce the dimensionality of the system, a proper |
|
orthogonal decomposition (POD) was performed. This tech- |
|
nique originates from turbulence studies and has been exten- |
|
sively explored in the literature (Lumley 1967). |
|
Data Reduction |
|
The main idea behind POD consists in decomposing a given |
|
spatiotemporal vector field u(x;t)into a set of spatial func- |
|
tionsk(x), or POD modes, and their respective time coef- |
|
ficientsk(t)(Weiss 2019). Then, the vector field u(x;t)is |
|
written as |
|
|
|
u(x;t) =1X |
|
k=1k(t)k(x); (1) |
|
where vector (or matrix) quantities are represented in bold. |
|
Although this decomposition may be carried out in dif- |
|
ferent ways, all of them must respect two basic conditions: |
|
the spatial functions have to be orthonormal and the first |
|
rPOD modes must capture the highest possible system‘s |
|
energy, where ris an arbitrary integer. Here, the POD was |
|
performed via the principal component analysis (PCA) from |
|
Scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al. 2011), which uses the singular |
|
value decomposition (SVD) of the data to represent them in |
|
a lower-dimensional space (a.k.a. latent space). It should be |
|
highlighted that, before applying PCA to the data, they were |
|
normalized in the interval [ 1;1]and then centered. |
|
The POD basis Vr, onto which the CO 2concentration |
|
training dataset is projected, is comprised by the rdominant |
|
POD modes. In other words, if C2Rntnxis the dataset |
|
matrix that contains the spatiotemporal concentration field, |
|
then the latent field variables bq(t), along the training inter- |
|
val, are obtained by multiplying CbyVr. Here,ntis the |
|
number of timesteps and nxis the number of grid points. |
|
The OpInf technique, to be described next, is then applied |
|
to the latent field variables. Note that, before applying PCA |
|
to the data, they were normalized from -1 to 1 and then cen- |
|
tered. |
|
Non-Intrusive Operator Inference (OpInf) |
|
The ROM for the atmospheric CO 2dispersion around the |
|
Earth was constructed through the OpInf approach (Pe- |
|
herstorfer and Willcox 2016). Since this physical phe- |
|
nomenon is mainly governed by advection and diffusion |
|
processes that move the carbon dioxide gas from one place |
|
to another, higher-order nonlinearities (cubic and above) |
|
were neglected and no forcing term was considered. Then, |
|
the general form of the OpInf-based ROM is written as |
|
d |
|
dtbq(t) =bc+bAbq(t) +cH(bq(t) |
|
bq(t)); (2) |
|
wheret2[t0;tf],t0andtfare the initial and final time |
|
instants, the initial state of the system bq(t0)is known, bc2 |
|
Rr,bA2RrrandcH2Rrr(r+1)=2are the operators to be |
|
inferred and the symbol |
|
refers to the Kronecker product. |
|
With the normalized latent field variables along the train- |
|
ing interval and their numerically computed time deriva- |
|
tives, it was possible to find the operators bc,bAandcHby |
|
solving a data-driven least-squares regression problem with |
|
regularization to avoid overfitting. Then, with optimal regu- |
|
larizers and operators and given the state of the reduced sys- |
|
tem att=t0, it was possible to integrate Eq. (2) and obtain |
|
all the latent field variables from t0totf. Finally, these vari- |
|
ables were projected back onto the original space, i.e., they |
|
were multiplied by VT |
|
r. To assess the predictive capabili- |
|
ties of the constructed ROM, normalized root-mean-square |
|
errors,ROM , were calculated across the spatiotemporal do- |
|
main byROM =1 |
|
csPnx |
|
j=1Pnt |
|
i=1(cROM |
|
i;j ci;j)2 |
|
nxnt; (3) |
|
where c=max(ci;j) min(ci;j),ci;jare the elements |
|
of the original matrix C, whilecROM |
|
i;j corresponds to the |
|
concentration field computed by the ROM. |
|
OCO-2 Carbon Dioxide Assimilated Dataset |
|
This dataset from NASA provides a high-quality estima- |
|
tion for the atmospheric CO 2concentration around the Earth |
|
(Weir and Ott 2022). It combines space-based measurements |
|
with state-of-the-art data assimilation techniques to han- |
|
dle instruments’ inability to see through clouds and thick |
|
aerosols. The data cover the period going from 2015.01.01 |
|
to 2021.10.30 in a daily basis, totalizing 2;495 timesteps |
|
(or snapshots). The spatial resolution is of 0:5along the |
|
Earth’s latitudinal axis and of 0:625along the longitudinal |
|
one. Then, there is a total of 361576 = 207;936grid |
|
points containing the CO 2data. |
|
Results and Discussion |
|
From 2;495snapshots, 2;000were used to train the PIML |
|
algorithm. To build a data-driven reduced-order model for |
|
the atmospheric CO 2dispersion around the Earth, the train- |
|
ing data was initially reduced from 207;936dimensions to |
|
their five most relevant ones, keeping 98.9% of the accumu- |
|
lated modal energy. This great value is justified by the fact |
|
that the average CO 2concentration highly dominates over |
|
its seasonal and spatial variations. Besides, the most domi- |
|
nant mode alone portrays 87.5% of the system‘s modal en- |
|
ergy. |
|
After the dimensionality reduction, a least-squares regres- |
|
sion with regularization is applied, as discussed previously. |
|
Figure 1 shows that the field variables in latent space ob- |
|
tained from the inferred operators were well approximated |
|
by the OpInf-based ROM along the training interval. Both |
|
the first and the fourth reduced variables are exhibited in |
|
this figure. Note that the ROM neglected the approximation |
|
of the noisy pattern for the fourth variable, a consequence |
|
of the POD reduction. Also, the model has difficulty in ac- |
|
curately predicting peaks and valleys of the high amplitude |
|
oscillations, as observed for the same variable. Such smooth- |
|
ing behavior is commonly seen in ML models. |
|
The original CO 2concentration field was reconstructed |
|
from the latent variables and then compared against the orig- |
|
inal observation. Figure 2 shows this comparison for a 338- |
|
days-ahead forecast. Visually, it may be seen that the ROM |
|
captures the main features of the dispersion. The normal- |
|
ized root-mean-square error for the testing interval, com- |
|
puted through Eq. (2), was about 4%. This small value is |
|
an indicative that the model is quite robust. |
|
Conclusion |
|
The capabilities of the data-driven reduced-order model |
|
based on a non-intrusive operator inference approach for |
|
|
|
Figure 1: Approximated and exact reduced variables along |
|
the training interval. On the top, the most relevant reduced |
|
variable, which carries 87.5% of the system‘s modal energy. |
|
On the bottom, the fourth one |
|
Figure 2: CO 2concentration field around the Earth accord- |
|
ing to the high-fidelity data (top) and to the reduced-order |
|
model (bottom) for the 338thtesting snapshotthe atmospheric CO 2dispersion around the Earth was as- |
|
sessed. It presented excellent predictive capabilities for this |
|
physical phenomenon in addition to being quickly deployed, |
|
with normalized root-mean-square errors below 5% for the |
|
testing interval. This physics-informed machine learning |
|
method seems to be adequate for large-scale climate sys- |
|
tems mainly governed by advection and diffusion processes. |
|
In practical terms, the OpInf-based ROM is well suited for |
|
uncertainty quantification of climate-related predictions. |
|
Acknowledgments |
|
The authors would like to thank IBM and the Brazilian agen- |
|
cies CAPES and CNPq for the financial support to this work. |
|
References |
|
Cort´es-Andr ´es, J.; Camps-Valls, G.; Sippel, S.; Sz’ekely, E.; |
|
Sejdinovic, D.; Diaz, E.; P’erez-Suay, A.; Li, Z.; Mahecha, |
|
M.; and Reichstein, M. 2022. Physics-aware nonparametric |
|
regression models for Earth data analysis. Environmental |
|
Research Letters , 17(5): 054034. |
|
Kashinath, K.; Mustafa, M.; Albert, A.; Wu, J.-L.; Jiang, |
|
C.; Esmaeilzadeh, S.; Azizzadenesheli, K.; Wang, R.; Chat- |
|
topadhyay, A.; Singh, A.; Manepalli, A.; Chirila, D.; Yu, R.; |
|
Walters, R.; White, B.; Xiao, H.; Tchelepi, H.; Marcus, P.; |
|
Anandkumar, A.; and Prabhat, M. 2021. Physics-informed |
|
machine learning: Case studies for weather and climate |
|
modelling. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathemat- |
|
ical, physical, and engineering sciences , 379: 20200093. |
|
Lumley, J. L. 1967. The structure of inhomogeneous turbu- |
|
lent flows. Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Prop- |
|
agation . |
|
McQuarrie, S. A.; Huang, C.; and Willcox, K. E. 2021. Data- |
|
driven reduced-order models via regularised Operator Infer- |
|
ence for a single-injector combustion process. Journal of the |
|
Royal Society of New Zealand , 51(2): 194–211. |
|
Nogueira Jr, A. C.; Carvalho, F. C.; Almeida, J. L. S.; Codas, |
|
A.; Bentivegna, E.; and Watson, C. D. 2021. Reservoir Com- |
|
puting in Reduced Order Modeling for Chaotic Dynamical |
|
Systems. In International Conference on High Performance |
|
Computing , 56–72. Springer, Cham. |
|
Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; Michel, V .; |
|
Thirion, B.; Grisel, O.; Blondel, M.; Prettenhofer, P.; Weiss, |
|
R.; Dubourg, V .; Vanderplas, J.; Passos, A.; Cournapeau, |
|
D.; Brucher, M.; Perrot, M.; and ´Edouard Duchesnay. 2011. |
|
Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. Journal of Ma- |
|
chine Learning Research , 12(85): 2825–2830. In press. |
|
Peherstorfer, B.; and Willcox, K. 2016. Data-driven oper- |
|
ator inference for nonintrusive projection-based model re- |
|
duction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and En- |
|
gineering , 306: 196–215. |
|
Reichstein, M.; Camps-Valls, G.; Stevens, B.; Jung, M.; |
|
Denzler, J.; Carvalhais, N.; and Prabhat. 2019. Deep learn- |
|
ing and process understanding for data-driven Earth system |
|
science. Nature . |
|
Schneider, T.; Jeevanjee, N.; and Socolow, R. 2021. Accel- |
|
erating progress in climate science. 74: 44–51. |
|
|
|
Swischuk, R.; Kr ¨amer, B.; Huang, C.; and Willcox, K. 2020. |
|
Learning physics-based reduced-order models for a single- |
|
injector combustion process. AIAA Journal , 58: 1–15. In |
|
press. |
|
Weir, B.; and Ott, L. 2022. OCO-2 GEOS Level 3 daily, |
|
0.5x0.625 assimilated CO2 V10r. https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/ |
|
datasets/OCO2 GEOS L3CO2 DAY 10r/summary. Ac- |
|
cessed: 2022-07-19. |
|
Weiss, J. 2019. A Tutorial on the Proper Orthogonal Decom- |
|
position. AIAA 2019–3333. American Institute of Aeronau- |
|
tics and Astronautics. Available Open Access acceptedVer- |
|
sion at https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/9456. |
|
Willard, J.; Jia, X.; Xu, S.; Steinbach, M.; and Kumar, |
|
V . 2022. Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine |
|
Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systems. ACM |
|
Computing Surveys . |
|
|
|
|