original passage: In an interview with "Entertainment Weekly", Bay admitted that the film's central premise "that NASA could actually do something in a situation like this" was unrealistic. Additionally, the largest known Potentially Hazardous Asteroid (PHA) is (53319) 1999 JM8, which is only in diameter, while the comet in the movie is described as being "the size of Texas". Near the end of the credits, there is a disclaimer stating, "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's cooperation and assistance does not reflect an endorsement of the contents of the film or the treatment of the characters depicted therein."
original sentence: In an interview with "Entertainment Weekly", Bay admitted that the film's central premise "that NASA could actually do something in a situation like this" was unrealistic.
sentence2: If we take Michael Bay at his word when he talks about the feasibility of asteroid-destroying technology at the end of the twentieth century, does it sound like NASA's disclaimer at the end of the movie was simply just a piece of legal boilerplate rather than an actual denial of what the movie implied?
sentence1: Bay gave an interview to "Entertainment Weekly" in which he admitted that the central idea of the movie, that NASA astronauts were capable of performing such feats, was infeasible. Additionally, the largest known Potentially Hazardous Asteroid (PHA) is (53319) 1999 JM8, which is smaller in diameter, while the comet in the movie is described as being "the size of Texas". Near the end of the credits, there is a disclaimer stating, "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's cooperation and assistance does not reflect an endorsement of the contents of the film or the treatment of the characters depicted therein."