original passage: Under this new law, it would be a crime to print, publish, sell, or exhibit any material intended to paralyze or destroy the insular government; or to organize any society, group or assembly of people with a similar destructive intent. It made it illegal to sing a patriotic song, and reinforced the 1898 law that had made it illegal to display the flag of Puerto Rico, with anyone found guilty of disobeying the law in any way being subject to a sentence of up to ten years imprisonment, a fine of up to US$10,000 (), or both.
original sentence: It made it illegal to sing a patriotic song, and reinforced the 1898 law that had made it illegal to display the flag of Puerto Rico, with anyone found guilty of disobeying the law in any way being subject to a sentence of up to ten years imprisonment, a fine of up to US$10,000 (), or both.
sentence2: If a clueless TV celebrity who thought he was capable of governing a country were to propose a similar law for the United States, would legal scholars point out that such a law would violate America's 1st amendment, with its right to freedom of speech, or its 13th amendment, with its abolition of involuntary servitude?
sentence1: Under this new law, it would be a crime to print, publish, sell, or exhibit any material intended to paralyze or destroy the insular government; or to organize any society, group or assembly of people with a similar destructive intent. It also made it illegal for citizens to refuse to join in on public singing of patriotic songs, and reinforced the 1898 law that had made it so.