Split (1)

split_1 · 50 rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

original_text stringlengths 119 1.8k	text stringlengths 65 916	success bool 1 class	think stringlengths 1.93k 8.74k
A fully differential calculation in perturbative quantum chromodynamics is presented for the production of massive photon pairs at hadron colliders. All next-to-leading order perturbative contributions from quark-antiquark, gluon-(anti)quark, and gluon-gluon subprocesses are included, as well as all-orders resummation of initial-state gluon radiation valid at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy. The region of phase space is specified in which the calculation is most reliable. Good agreement is demonstrated with data from the Fermilab Tevatron, and predictions are made for more detailed tests with CDF and DO data. Predictions are shown for distributions of diphoton pairs produced at the energy of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Distributions of the diphoton pairs from the decay of a Higgs boson are contrasted with those produced from QCD processes at the LHC, showing that enhanced sensitivity to the signal can be obtained with judicious selection of events.	섭동 양자색역학(perturbative quantum chromodynamics)에서 강입자 충돌기(hadron colliders)에서 질량을 갖는 광자 쌍 생성을 위한 완전 미분 계산(fully differential calculation)이 제시되었다. 쿼크-반쿼크(quark-antiquark), 글루온-(반)쿼크(gluon-(anti)quark), 글루온-글루온(gluon-gluon) 부분 과정(subprocesses)에서 유래하는 모든 다음-최고 차수(next-to-leading order) 섭동 기여들이 포함되었으며, 초기 상태 글루온 복사(initial-state gluon radiation)에 대한 모든 차수 재합산(all-orders resummation)도 다음-다음-최고 차수 로그 정확도(next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy)에서 유효하게 포함되었다. 계산이 가장 신뢰할 수 있는 위상 공간의 영역이 명시되었다. 페르미국립가속기연구소 테바트론(Fermilab Tevatron)의 실험 데이터와 좋은 일치가 확인되었으며, CDF 및 D0 실험 데이터를 활용한 보다 상세한 검증을 위한 예측이 제시되었다. 대형 강입자 충돌기(Large Hadron Collider, LHC)의 에너지에서 생성된 이광자 쌍의 분포 예측 결과가 도출되었으며, LHC에서 힉스 보존(Higgs boson) 붕괴에 따른 이광자 쌍 분포와 QCD 과정에 의한 분포가 비교되었다. 이를 통해 사건 선택(event selection)을 신중히 수행할 경우 신호 감도를 향상시킬 수 있음이 입증되었다.	true	Okay, I need to translate this technical physics text into Korean while following all the strict guidelines provided. Let me start by reading through the entire passage to understand the context and key terms. The text discusses a differential calculation in perturbative QCD for massive photon pairs at hadron colliders. Terms like "next-to-leading order," "gluon radiation," and "Large Hadron Collider (LHC)" come up. I should make sure these are translated accurately. First sentence: "A fully differential calculation in perturbative quantum chromodynamics is presented for the production of massive photon pairs at hadron colliders." Here, "fully differential calculation" should be translated as "완전 미분 계산" and "perturbative quantum chromodynamics" as "섭동 양자색역학". Proper nouns like "hadron colliders" are "강입자 충돌기" in Korean. Next, "All next-to-leading order perturbative contributions from quark-antiquark, gluon-(anti)quark, and gluon-gluon subprocesses are included..." The term "next-to-leading order" is commonly translated as "다음-최고 차수" in physics contexts. "Quark-antiquark" is "쿼크-반쿼크", "gluon-(anti)quark" would be "글루온-(반)쿼크", and "gluon-gluon subprocesses" as "글루온-글루온 부분 과정". Moving on to "all-orders resummation of initial-state gluon radiation valid at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy." Here, "all-orders resummation" is "모든 차수 재합산", "initial-state gluon radiation" becomes "초기 상태 글루온 복사", and "next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy" is "다음-다음-최고 차수 로그 정확도". The phrase "The region of phase space is specified..." translates to "위상 공간의 영역이 명시되어 있으며...". When mentioning experiments like "Fermilab Tevatron" and "CDF and DO data", I should keep the names in English but add Korean explanations in parentheses if necessary. However, since these are well-known experiments, maybe just keep them as is. For example, "Fermilab Tevatron" stays as "페르미국립가속기연구소 테바트론(Fermilab Tevatron)". For "Large Hadron Collider (LHC)", the standard translation is "대형 강입자 충돌기(LHC)", but since the user mentioned to prioritize Korean translations, I should use "대형 강입자 충돌기" and put LHC in parentheses. The part about "Higgs boson" should be "힉스 보존" and "QCD processes" as "QCD 과정". I need to check if technical terms have established Korean equivalents. For example, "resummation" is "재합산", "logarithmic accuracy" is "로그 정확도". Also, "enhanced sensitivity" would be "향상된 감도". I must ensure that each sentence is translated individually, maintaining the original structure and flow. Also, watch out for proper formatting, keeping paragraphs and line breaks as in the original. Since the original text is a single paragraph, I'll keep it as one unless there are logical breaks. Let me go through each sentence again to verify accuracy and adherence to guidelines. Make sure not to use English terms unless absolutely necessary, and even then, only in parentheses for highly specialized terms. For instance, "next-to-leading order" might be better as the Korean translation rather than leaving it in English. Finally, ensure that the translation is formal and professional, suitable for an academic context. Avoid any colloquial expressions and stick to the formal register required.
We describe a new algorithm, the $(k,\ell)$-pebble game with colors, and use it obtain a characterization of the family of $(k,\ell)$-sparse graphs and algorithmic solutions to a family of problems concerning tree decompositions of graphs. Special instances of sparse graphs appear in rigidity theory and have received increased attention in recent years. In particular, our colored pebbles generalize and strengthen the previous results of Lee and Streinu and give a new proof of the Tutte-Nash-Williams characterization of arboricity. We also present a new decomposition that certifies sparsity based on the $(k,\ell)$-pebble game with colors. Our work also exposes connections between pebble game algorithms and previous sparse graph algorithms by Gabow, Gabow and Westermann and Hendrickson.	우리는 새로운 알고리즘인 $(k,\ell)$-색상 페블 게임을 설명하고 이를 통해 $(k,\ell)$-희소 그래프족의 특성화와 그래프의 트리 분해 관련 문제군에 대한 알고리즘적 해법을 도출한다. 희소 그래프의 특정 형태는 강성 이론에 등장하며 최근 몇 년간 증가된 관심을 받아왔다. 특히, 우리의 색상 페블은 리와 스트라인의 이전 결과를 일반화하고 확장하며, 아보리시티(arboricity)의 투테-내시-윌리엄스 특성화에 대한 새로운 증명을 제공한다. 또한 $(k,\ell)$-색상 페블 게임을 기반으로 희소성을 입증하는 새로운 분해 기법을 제시한다. 우리의 연구는 가보우, 가보우와 베스터만, 헨드릭슨의 기존 희소 그래프 알고리즘들과 페블 게임 알고리즘 간의 연관성도 드러낸다.	true	Okay, let me start by reading through the original text carefully to understand the content. The user is describing a new algorithm called the (k, ℓ)-pebble game with colors and its applications in characterizing sparse graphs and solving problems related to tree decompositions. They also mention connections to rigidity theory and prior work by various researchers. First, I need to translate this into Korean while following the strict guidelines provided. Let me break down each sentence and translate them one by one, ensuring that technical terms are handled correctly. The first sentence introduces the algorithm. The term "(k,ℓ)-pebble game with colors" should be kept in English since it's a specific technical term. However, "sparse graphs" can be translated as "희소 그래프" which is the standard term. Similarly, "tree decompositions" would be "트리 분해" and "rigidity theory" as "강성 이론". Next, the mention of Lee and Streinu should remain in English as proper nouns. The term "Tutte-Nash-Williams characterization of arboricity" is a well-known concept, so "arboricity" here should stay in English, but the rest can be translated. For the part about Gabow, Gabow and Westermann, and Hendrickson, these are all names of researchers, so they remain in English. The term "pebble game algorithms" should stay as is but with "pebble game" possibly translated to "페블 게임" if it's commonly known that way in Korean literature. However, since the user specified to keep technical terms in English unless there's a well-established Korean equivalent, I should check. "Pebble game" in algorithms might not have a standard translation, so keeping it in English is safer. I need to ensure that each sentence is translated accurately without losing the original meaning. Also, the structure of the paragraphs should be maintained, but if there are arbitrary line breaks, I should consolidate them. The original text seems to have line breaks after each sentence, so merging them into logical paragraphs in Korean would improve readability. Checking for technical terms again: "sparse graphs" is definitely "희소 그래프". "Tree decompositions" is "트리 분해" or "트리 분해 문제". "Rigidity theory" is "강성 이론". "Tutte-Nash-Williams theorem" is often referred to in Korean papers with the original names, so keeping it as is but translating "characterization" to "특성화" makes sense. Also, ensuring that the formal and professional tone is maintained throughout. Avoiding colloquial expressions and sticking to academic language. For example, "give a new proof" can be "새로운 증명을 제공한다" which is formal. Now, putting it all together, making sure that each technical term is either translated if there's a standard equivalent or kept in English. Also, preserving the structure like headings, bullet points, etc., but the original text doesn't have any except for the main content. Finally, reviewing the translation to check for flow and readability in Korean, ensuring that the sentences are logically grouped and that line breaks are where they make sense for Korean readers. Making sure that no content is omitted and that all guidelines are followed precisely.
The evolution of Earth-Moon system is described by the dark matter field fluid model proposed in the Meeting of Division of Particle and Field 2004, American Physical Society. The current behavior of the Earth-Moon system agrees with this model very well and the general pattern of the evolution of the Moon-Earth system described by this model agrees with geological and fossil evidence. The closest distance of the Moon to Earth was about 259000 km at 4.5 billion years ago, which is far beyond the Roche's limit. The result suggests that the tidal friction may not be the primary cause for the evolution of the Earth-Moon system. The average dark matter field fluid constant derived from Earth-Moon system data is 4.39 x 10^(-22) s^(-1)m^(-1). This model predicts that the Mars's rotation is also slowing with the angular acceleration rate about -4.38 x 10^(-22) rad s^(-2).	지구-달 시스템의 진화는 미국물리학회 2004년 입자 및 장 분과회의에서 제안된 암흑 물질 장 유체 모델에 의해 설명된다. 현재의 지구-달 시스템 행동은 이 모델과 매우 잘 일치하며, 이 모델이 묘사하는 달-지구 시스템 진화의 일반적 패턴은 지질학적 및 화석 증거와 부합한다. 달이 지구에 가장 가까웠던 거리는 45억 년 전 약 259,000km였으며 이는 로슈 한계(Roche's limit)보다 훨씬 먼 거리이다. 이 결과는 조석 마찰이 지구-달 시스템 진화의 주요 원인이 아닐 수 있음을 시사한다. 지구-달 시스템 데이터로부터 도출된 평균 암흑 물질 장 유체 상수는 4.39×10⁻²² s⁻¹m⁻¹이다. 이 모델은 화성의 자전도 각가속도 약 -4.38×10⁻²² rad s⁻²의 속도로 느려지고 있음을 예측한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. The user wants a precise Korean translation of a scientific text about the Earth-Moon system and dark matter. First, I need to parse each sentence carefully. Starting with the first sentence: "The evolution of Earth-Moon system is described by the dark matter field fluid model proposed in the Meeting of Division of Particle and Field 2004, American Physical Society." Proper nouns like the conference name and society should stay in English, but maybe add parentheses with Korean translation? Wait, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean for technical terms unless it's extremely specialized. But "Meeting of Division of Particle and Field 2004" is a specific event, so keeping it in English is better. "Dark matter field fluid model" – I need to check if there's a standard Korean term. Probably "암흑 물질 장 유체 모델" would work. Next sentence: "The current behavior of the Earth-Moon system agrees with this model very well..." "Behavior" here is more like "current state" or "current dynamics" in Korean. "Agrees with geological and fossil evidence" – "지질학적 및 화석 증거와 일치한다" seems accurate. Third sentence: "The closest distance of the Moon to Earth was about 259000 km at 4.5 billion years ago..." Need to make sure numbers and units are correctly converted. "4.5 billion years ago" is "45억 년 전". The Roche's limit should stay as is, but maybe add "로슈 한계" in Korean. Wait, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean terms. "Roche's limit" is commonly known as "로슈 한계" in Korean scientific contexts, so I should use that. Fourth sentence: "The result suggests that the tidal friction may not be the primary cause..." "Tidal friction" is "조석 마찰" in Korean. The phrase "primary cause" translates to "주요 원인". Next: "The average dark matter field fluid constant derived from Earth-Moon system data is 4.39 x 10^(-22) s^(-1)m^(-1)." Units need to be in Korean format, but the notation like s⁻¹m⁻¹ remains the same. The term "dark matter field fluid constant" might be "암흑 물질 장 유체 상수" in Korean. Last sentence: "This model predicts that the Mars's rotation is also slowing with the angular acceleration rate about -4.38 x 10^(-22) rad s^(-2)." "Mars's rotation" becomes "화성의 자전", "angular acceleration rate" is "각가속도". The units here are rad s⁻², which is standard in Korean scientific writing. I should check for any technical terms that might not have established Korean equivalents. For example, "dark matter field fluid model" – if there's no standard translation, maybe keep it in English with parentheses. But according to the guidelines, prioritize Korean unless it's extremely specialized. Since dark matter is a known concept, translating it as "암흑 물질" is correct. Also, ensure that numbers and units are formatted correctly. In Korean, "4.39 x 10^(-22)" becomes "4.39 × 10⁻²²". Use proper superscript notation if possible. The user mentioned preserving formatting, so the exponents should be in superscript if the original uses that. However, in plain text, it's usually written with carets. Check for sentence-by-sentence translation, making sure each sentence is translated individually but flows well. Avoid line breaks that were present in the original unless they are part of the content structure. The original text has line breaks after each sentence, so in Korean, I should keep each translated sentence on its own line for readability. Also, ensure that the formal academic tone is maintained. Use appropriate Korean scientific terminology and avoid colloquial expressions. Double-check proper nouns: "American Physical Society" remains "American Physical Society" but sometimes translated as "미국물리학회", but the guidelines say to keep proper nouns in English. So leave it as is. Lastly, verify that all numbers, units, and technical terms are accurately translated and that the meaning is preserved without any interpretation. Make sure that the translated text is complete and adheres to the formatting guidelines, such as preserving paragraphs and special characters.
We show that a determinant of Stirling cycle numbers counts unlabeled acyclic single-source automata. The proof involves a bijection from these automata to certain marked lattice paths and a sign-reversing involution to evaluate the determinant.	스털링 순환 수의 행렬식이 라벨이 없는 비순환 단일 소스 오토마타를 세는 방법임을 보인다. 증명은 이러한 오토마타에서 특정 표시된 격자 경로로의 전단사 사상과 행렬식을 계산하기 위한 부호 반전 인볼루션을 포함한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation request. The user provided a technical passage about Stirling cycle numbers and automata, and wants it translated into Korean following strict guidelines. First, I need to parse the original text carefully to understand the context and key terms. The main sentence is: "We show that a determinant of Stirling cycle numbers counts unlabeled acyclic single-source automata." The key terms here are "determinant of Stirling cycle numbers," "unlabeled acyclic single-source automata," and the mention of a bijection and a sign-reversing involution. Starting with "Stirling cycle numbers," I recall that in combinatorics, Stirling numbers of the first kind are often referred to as Stirling cycle numbers. In Korean, they are commonly translated as "스털링 순열 수" or "스털링 첫 번째 종류 수." However, since the term "cycle numbers" is specified, it's more precise to use "순환 수" here. So "Stirling cycle numbers" would be "스털링 순환 수." Next, "determinant of Stirling cycle numbers" translates to "스털링 순환 수의 행렬식." The term "행렬식" is the standard term for determinant in linear algebra. Moving on to "unlabeled acyclic single-source automata," the components are "unlabeled" (라벨이 없는), "acyclic" (비순환), "single-source" (단일 소스), and "automata" (자동장치 or 오토마타). In academic contexts, "automata" is often kept as 오토마타 in Korean, but sometimes translated as 자동장치. Given the technical nature, using 오토마타 might be better, but I should check if there's an established term. "Unlabeled acyclic single-source automata" would then be "라벨이 없는 비순환 단일 소스 오토마타." The next part: "The proof involves a bijection from these automata to certain marked lattice paths and a sign-reversing involution to evaluate the determinant." "Bijection" is 전단사 사상 or 단사 전사 사상. "Marked lattice paths" can be "표시된 격자 경로." "Sign-reversing involution" is "부호 반전 인볼루션." Putting it all together, I need to ensure that technical terms are accurately translated while maintaining the formal academic tone. Also, the structure of the sentences should follow Korean grammar rules, which often place the verb at the end. For example, "We show that..." becomes "우리는 ...임을 보인다." The sentence structure in Korean might require reordering some phrases for clarity. Another point is the phrase "counts unlabeled acyclic single-source automata." Here, "counts" is used as a verb meaning "enumerates" or "counts the number of." In Korean, "세는 방법" or "개수를 센다" could work, but "세는 방법" might be more appropriate in an academic context to imply enumeration. I also need to check if "sign-reversing involution" has a standard translation. Since "involution" in mathematics refers to a self-inverse function, and "sign-reversing" would be 부호 반전. So "부호 반전 인볼루션" is acceptable. Ensuring that all technical terms are correctly translated without unnecessary parentheses. Since the user emphasized using Korean terms unless it's extremely specialized, I should avoid using English terms in parentheses unless necessary. Finally, the translation should flow naturally in Korean academic prose, maintaining the original meaning and structure. Each sentence should be translated individually but with attention to the overall coherence of the paragraph.
In this paper we show how to compute the $\Lambda_{\alpha}$ norm, $\alpha\ge 0$, using the dyadic grid. This result is a consequence of the description of the Hardy spaces $H^p(R^N)$ in terms of dyadic and special atoms.	본 논문에서는 이진 격자를 이용하여 $\Lambda_{\alpha}$ 노름($\alpha\ge 0$)을 계산하는 방법을 제시한다. 이 결과는 하디 공간 $H^p(\mathbb{R}^N)$을 이진 및 특수 아톰을 통해 기술한 내용의 결과이다.	true	Okay, let's start translating this academic text into Korean. The user has given very detailed instructions, so I need to make sure I follow them closely. First, the sentence structure: each sentence should be translated individually but maintain the flow. The original text has two sentences. I'll check each part. The first part mentions "compute the Λα norm, α ≥ 0, using the dyadic grid." Here, technical terms like Λα norm and dyadic grid need careful handling. Since these are mathematical terms, I should check if they have established Korean equivalents. "Dyadic grid" might be "이진 격자" and "Hardy spaces" as "하디 공간." The second sentence talks about Hardy spaces H^p(R^N) and dyadic/special atoms. Again, proper nouns like H^p(R^N) should stay in English with Korean explanation if needed. "Special atoms" could be "특수 아톰" but need to confirm if "아톰" is commonly used in this context. I need to preserve the mathematical notations like $\Lambda_{\alpha}$ and $H^p(R^N)$. Also, ensure that the formatting like the line breaks and paragraphs are maintained. The user emphasized consolidating arbitrary line breaks, but since this is a short text, each sentence is a paragraph. Technical terms: For "dyadic grid," I think "이진 격자" is acceptable. "Special atoms" might not have a direct translation, but "특수 아톰" with a parenthetical in English if necessary. Wait, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean translations and only use English in parentheses for extremely specialized terms. Let me check if "special atoms" here refers to a specific concept. Since it's in the context of Hardy spaces and dyadic atoms, "아톰" is commonly used in mathematics, so maybe just "특수 아톰" without parentheses. Also, the phrase "This result is a consequence of..." should be translated formally. "이 결과는 ... 의 결과이다" would work. I need to ensure that the translation is formal and professional, avoiding colloquial language. Let me piece it together: "In this paper we show how to compute the Λα norm, α ≥ 0, using the dyadic grid." → "본 논문에서는 이진 격자를 이용하여 Λα 노름(α ≥ 0)을 계산하는 방법을 제시한다." "Hardy spaces H^p(R^N)" → "하디 공간 H^p(R^N)" since Hardy spaces are commonly translated as 하디 공간 in Korean mathematical literature. "dyadic and special atoms" → "이진 및 특수 아톰" but check if "아톰" is standard. If yes, then no need for parentheses. Otherwise, maybe "특수 아톰(atoms)" but according to the guidelines, only use English in parentheses for very specialized terms. Since "atoms" in this context are specific, maybe include the English term. Wait, the instruction says to keep technical terms in English unless the entire input is a single term. Wait, no, the instruction says to prioritize Korean translations. Let me recheck the guidelines: "Prioritize Korean translations for all terms whenever possible. Only provide English terms in parentheses as a last resort for extremely specialized domain-specific terminology that would be genuinely difficult for Korean readers to research or understand through Korean translation alone." So, if there's a standard Korean term for "atoms" in this context, use it. If not, use the English term in parentheses. Since "dyadic atoms" are a concept in harmonic analysis, and I'm not sure if there's an established Korean term, maybe use "아톰" with parentheses for clarification. However, in Korean academic papers, sometimes "아톰" is used as is. Alternatively, "원자" might be the direct translation, but that could be confusing. To confirm, "dyadic atoms" in the context of Hardy spaces are usually referred to as "아톰" in Korean, so perhaps it's acceptable without parentheses. Putting it all together: "본 논문에서는 이진 격자를 이용하여 Λα 노름(α ≥ 0)을 계산하는 방법을 제시한다. 이 결과는 하디 공간 H^p(R^N)을 이진 및 특수 아톰을 통해 기술한 내용의 결과이다." Check if "특수 아톰" is correct. If "special atoms" here refers to a specific type defined in the paper, maybe it's better to keep "특수 아톰" without parentheses. Also, ensure that the mathematical symbols are preserved. The line breaks: the original has two sentences, each as a separate paragraph. The translation should maintain that structure. Also, check for any formatting requirements. The user mentioned preserving paragraphs and special characters. The original uses $\Lambda_{\alpha}$ which should be kept as is in LaTeX. The Korean translation should have the same structure with the math expressions unchanged. Yes, this seems to meet all the guidelines. Now, review for formal academic tone, correct terminology, and adherence to instructions.
We study the two-particle wave function of paired atoms in a Fermi gas with tunable interaction strengths controlled by Feshbach resonance. The Cooper pair wave function is examined for its bosonic characters, which is quantified by the correction of Bose enhancement factor associated with the creation and annihilation composite particle operators. An example is given for a three-dimensional uniform gas. Two definitions of Cooper pair wave function are examined. One of which is chosen to reflect the off-diagonal long range order (ODLRO). Another one corresponds to a pair projection of a BCS state. On the side with negative scattering length, we found that paired atoms described by ODLRO are more bosonic than the pair projected definition. It is also found that at $(k_F a)^{-1} \ge 1$, both definitions give similar results, where more than 90% of the atoms occupy the corresponding molecular condensates.	페시바흐 공명을 통해 조절 가능한 상호작용 세기를 갖는 페르미 기체에서 결합된 원자의 두 입자 파동 함수를 연구한다. 쿠퍼 쌍 파동 함수의 보존 입자 특성은 복합 입자 연산자의 창조 및 소멸과 관련된 보스 증강 인자의 수정을 통해 정량적으로 분석된다. 삼차원 균일 기체에 대한 예시가 제시된다. 쿠퍼 쌍 파동 함수의 두 가지 정의가 검토되며, 하나는 비대각 장거리 순서(ODLRO)를 반영하도록 선택되었고, 다른 하나는 BCS 상태의 쌍 결합 투영에 해당한다. 음의 산란 길이 영역에서 ODLRO로 기술되는 결합된 원자는 쌍 결합 투영 정의에 비해 더 뚜렷한 보존 입자 특성을 나타냄을 발견하였다. 또한 $(k_F a)^{-1} \ge 1$에서 두 정의는 유사한 결과를 제공하며, 이때 해당 분자 응축체에 90% 이상의 원자가 존재함을 확인하였다.	true	Okay, let's start translating this scientific text into Korean. First, I need to make sure I understand the content thoroughly. The text discusses the two-particle wave function of paired atoms in a Fermi gas, focusing on Cooper pairs and their bosonic characteristics using the Bose enhancement factor. There's mention of Feshbach resonance, ODLRO, and BCS states. I should begin by translating each sentence one by one. The first sentence talks about studying the two-particle wave function with tunable interactions via Feshbach resonance. The term "Feshbach resonance" is a proper noun, so it should stay in English. I need to check if "Fermi gas" is commonly translated as 페르미 기체 in Korean. Yes, that's standard. Next, "Cooper pair wave function" becomes 쿠퍼 쌍 파동 함수. "Bosonic characters" here refers to bosonic properties, so 보존 입자 특성 would work. The Bose enhancement factor is a technical term; 보스 증강 인자 with a note if needed, but since it's established, probably no need for parentheses. The example given is a three-dimensional uniform gas. 삼차원 균일 기체. "Three-dimensional" is 삼차원, which is correct. Two definitions of the Cooper pair wave function are examined. Here, "definitions" should be 정의 in Korean. The first definition reflects ODLRO, which is an acronym. Since ODLRO is a technical term, I'll keep it as ODLRO (off-diagonal long range order) in parentheses once, but according to the guidelines, only use English if no Korean equivalent exists. Wait, ODLRO is often translated as 비대각 장거리 순서 in Korean literature. So I should use that and maybe put ODLRO in parentheses if necessary. However, the user says to prioritize Korean translations. So 비대각 장거리 순서 (ODLRO) on first mention, then ODLRO afterwards. The second definition corresponds to a pair projection of a BCS state. BCS state is already a proper noun, so BCS 상태. On the side with negative scattering length: negative scattering length is 음의 산란 길이. "Side" here refers to the regime, so 측 or 영역. 음의 산란 길이 영역에서. "More bosonic than" would be 보존 입자 특성이 더 두드러짐. At (k_F a)^{-1} ≥ 1, both definitions give similar results. The notation (k_F a)^{-1} should remain as is since it's a mathematical expression. "More than 90% of the atoms occupy the corresponding molecular condensates" translates to 90% 이상의 원자가 해당 분자 응축체에 존재함. I need to check technical terms again. Composite particle operators are 복합 입자 연산자. "Creation and annihilation" are 창조 및 소멸. Also, ensure that paragraphs and line breaks are maintained logically. The original text has a few paragraphs; I'll keep the structure but ensure that each sentence flows well in Korean. Make sure not to use any markdown and keep the translation formal and precise. Avoid colloquial expressions. Double-check the handling of technical terms like "Feshbach resonance" (페시바흐 공명), "BCS state" (BCS 상태), "scattering length" (산란 길이), and "molecular condensates" (분자 응축체). Finally, review the entire translation to ensure that all guidelines are followed, especially preserving the original meaning, formatting, and correctly handling technical terms either in Korean or with English in parentheses if absolutely necessary.
A rather non-standard quantum representation of the canonical commutation relations of quantum mechanics systems, known as the polymer representation has gained some attention in recent years, due to its possible relation with Planck scale physics. In particular, this approach has been followed in a symmetric sector of loop quantum gravity known as loop quantum cosmology. Here we explore different aspects of the relation between the ordinary Schroedinger theory and the polymer description. The paper has two parts. In the first one, we derive the polymer quantum mechanics starting from the ordinary Schroedinger theory and show that the polymer description arises as an appropriate limit. In the second part we consider the continuum limit of this theory, namely, the reverse process in which one starts from the discrete theory and tries to recover back the ordinary Schroedinger quantum mechanics. We consider several examples of interest, including the harmonic oscillator, the free particle and a simple cosmological model.	상당히 비표준적인 양자 표현인 폴리머 표현은 양자 역학 시스템의 표준적인 교환 관계(canonical commutation relations)에 대한 표현으로, 최근 플랑크 스케일 물리학과의 관련 가능성으로 인해 주목을 받고 있습니다. 특히 이 접근법은 루프 양자 중력의 대칭 구역에서 따르는 방식으로, 이는 루프 양자 우주론으로 알려져 있습니다. 본 연구에서는 일반적인 슈뢰딩거 이론과 폴리머 설명 사이 관계의 다양한 측면을 탐구합니다. 논문은 두 부분으로 구성됩니다. 첫 번째 부분에서는 일반적인 슈뢰딩거 이론에서 출발하여 폴리머 양자 역학을 유도하고, 폴리머 설명이 적절한 극한에서 도출됨을 보입니다. 두 번째 부분에서는 이 이론의 연속체 극한(continuum limit)을 고찰하며, 즉 이산적 이론에서 출발하여 다시 일반적인 슈뢰딩거 양자 역학을 회복하는 역과정을 다룹니다. 조화 진동자, 자유 입자, 단순한 우주론 모델을 포함한 여러 사례를 검토합니다.	true	Okay, I need to translate this academic text into Korean following the strict guidelines provided. Let me start by reading through the entire passage to understand the context and the technical terms involved. The text discusses the polymer representation in quantum mechanics and its relation to Planck scale physics, loop quantum gravity, and cosmology. There are terms like "canonical commutation relations," "Schroedinger theory," "polymer quantum mechanics," "loop quantum cosmology," and specific examples like "harmonic oscillator" and "free particle." First, I should check if these terms have established Korean equivalents. For instance, "canonical commutation relations" is a standard term in quantum mechanics. I'll use the Korean translation unless instructed otherwise. Proper nouns like "Planck scale physics" should stay in English with parentheses if needed, but since "Planck scale" is a well-known concept, the Korean translation should suffice. The guideline says to prioritize Korean translations for technical terms unless they're extremely specialized. So "polymer representation" might be translated as 폴리머 표현, but I need to verify if this is the accepted term in the field. If not, I might keep it in English with parentheses. However, the instruction says to keep English terms only as a last resort. Looking at "loop quantum gravity" and "loop quantum cosmology," these are specific theories. The standard Korean translations would be 루프 양자 중력 and 루프 양자 우주론, respectively. I should use these instead of leaving them in English. The term "Schroedinger theory" refers to the Schrödinger equation or quantum mechanics, so translating it as 슈뢰딩거 이론 is appropriate. Similarly, "harmonic oscillator" and "free particle" are standard physics terms in Korean: 조화 진동자 and 자유 입자. Now, structuring the translation sentence by sentence. Each paragraph and line break must be preserved. The original text has some line breaks that seem to be from web formatting (like after "has gained some attention..."), so I should consolidate those into a coherent paragraph. I need to ensure that technical terms are consistently translated throughout the text. Also, maintaining the formal academic tone is crucial. Avoid colloquial expressions and stick to professional language. For example, the sentence "A rather non-standard quantum representation..." becomes "상당히 비표준적인 양자 표현인 폴리머 표현은..." Here, "non-standard" is translated as 비표준적인, and "polymer representation" is kept as 폴리머 표현 since it's a specific term. In the part mentioning "symmetric sector of loop quantum gravity," the translation would be "루프 양자 중력의 대칭 구역." Ensuring that each component is accurately translated while maintaining the original structure. When dealing with examples like "harmonic oscillator, the free particle and a simple cosmological model," the translations are 조화 진동자, 자유 입자, 그리고 단순한 우주론 모델. I also need to check for any embedded instructions or special formatting, but the text seems to be straightforward academic content without code or URLs. Finally, review the entire translation to ensure that all guidelines are met: sentence-by-sentence, meaning preserved, technical terms handled correctly, formatting maintained, and formal tone used. Make sure there are no explanations or additional notes, just the translated text.
A general formulation was developed to represent material models for applications in dynamic loading. Numerical methods were devised to calculate response to shock and ramp compression, and ramp decompression, generalizing previous solutions for scalar equations of state. The numerical methods were found to be flexible and robust, and matched analytic results to a high accuracy. The basic ramp and shock solution methods were coupled to solve for composite deformation paths, such as shock-induced impacts, and shock interactions with a planar interface between different materials. These calculations capture much of the physics of typical material dynamics experiments, without requiring spatially-resolving simulations. Example calculations were made of loading histories in metals, illustrating the effects of plastic work on the temperatures induced in quasi-isentropic and shock-release experiments, and the effect of a phase transition.	동적 하중 적용을 위한 재료 모델을 표현하기 위한 일반적인 공식화가 개발되었다. 충격 및 램프 압축, 램프 감압에 대한 응답을 계산하기 위한 수치 방법이 개발되었으며, 이는 스칼라 상태 방정식의 기존 해법을 일반화한 것이다. 이러한 수치 방법은 유연하고 강건하며, 해석적 결과와 매우 높은 정확도로 일치함을 확인하였다. 기본적인 램프 및 충격 해법은 복합 변형 경로를 해결하기 위해 결합되었으며, 예를 들어 충격 유도 충돌, 그리고 서로 다른 물질 간 평면 계면과의 충격 상호작용 등을 다룬다. 이러한 계산은 공간적 해상도를 갖춘 시뮬레이션 없이도 일반적인 재료 역학 실험의 물리적 현상을 상당 부분 포착한다. 금속 내 하중 이력에 대한 예시 계산을 수행하여 준등엔트로피 및 충격-방출 실험에서 유도된 온도에 대한 소성 일의 영향과 상전이의 영향을 설명하였다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. First, I need to read through the entire text to understand the context. It's about material models and numerical methods for dynamic loading, specifically dealing with shock and ramp compression. The user wants a precise translation into Korean while following strict guidelines. Starting with the first sentence: "A general formulation was developed to represent material models for applications in dynamic loading." The key terms here are "general formulation," "material models," and "dynamic loading." I need to make sure these are translated accurately. "Formulation" would be "공식화" or "수식화," but "공식화" seems more appropriate here. "Dynamic loading" is "동적 하중" in Korean. So the sentence becomes "동적 하중 적용을 위한 재료 모델을 표현하기 위한 일반적인 공식화가 개발되었다." Next: "Numerical methods were devised to calculate response to shock and ramp compression, and ramp decompression, generalizing previous solutions for scalar equations of state." Here, "numerical methods" is "수치 방법," "shock" is "충격," "ramp compression" is "램프 압축," and "equations of state" is "상태 방정식." The phrase "generalizing previous solutions" should be "기존 해법을 일반화하여." So the translation would be "충격 및 램프 압축, 램프 감압에 대한 응답을 계산하기 위한 수치 방법이 개발되었으며, 이는 스칼라 상태 방정식의 기존 해법을 일반화한 것이다." Moving on to the next part: "The numerical methods were found to be flexible and robust, and matched analytic results to a high accuracy." Terms like "flexible and robust" need to be accurately conveyed. "Flexible" could be "유연한," "robust" as "강건한," and "analytic results" as "해석적 결과." The sentence becomes "이러한 수치 방법은 유연하고 강건하며, 해석적 결과와 매우 높은 정확도로 일치함을 확인하였다." Continuing: "The basic ramp and shock solution methods were coupled to solve for composite deformation paths, such as shock-induced impacts, and shock interactions with a planar interface between different materials." Here, "coupled" would be "결합하여," "composite deformation paths" as "복합 변형 경로," and "planar interface" as "평면 계면." The translation would be "기본적인 램프 및 충격 해법은 복합 변형 경로를 해결하기 위해 결합되었으며, 예를 들어 충격 유도 충돌, 그리고 서로 다른 물질 간 평면 계면과의 충격 상호작용 등을 다룬다." Next: "These calculations capture much of the physics of typical material dynamics experiments, without requiring spatially-resolving simulations." "Material dynamics" is "재료 역학," "spatially-resolving simulations" could be "공간적 해상도를 갖춘 시뮬레이션." So, "이러한 계산은 공간적 해상도를 갖춘 시뮬레이션 없이도 일반적인 재료 역학 실험의 물리적 현상을 상당 부분 포착한다." Finally: "Example calculations were made of loading histories in metals, illustrating the effects of plastic work on the temperatures induced in quasi-isentropic and shock-release experiments, and the effect of a phase transition." "Loading histories" is "하중 이력," "quasi-isentropic" as "준등엔트로피," and "phase transition" is "상전이." The translation would be "금속 내 하중 이력에 대한 예시 계산을 수행하여 준등엔트로피 및 충격-방출 실험에서 유도된 온도에 대한 소성 일의 영향과 상전이의 영향을 설명하였다." I need to check technical terms again to ensure they are correctly translated. For example, "ramp decompression" is "램프 감압" which is correct. Also, "quasi-isentropic" is "준등엔트로피" which is the standard term. Proper nouns like "phase transition" are translated as "상전이" without English parentheses since they have established Korean equivalents. Make sure the sentences flow well in Korean and maintain the formal academic tone. Avoid any colloquial expressions. Also, check that all paragraphs and line breaks are preserved as per the original structure. No markdown formatting, just plain text with appropriate line breaks for readability.
We discuss the results from the combined IRAC and MIPS c2d Spitzer Legacy observations of the Serpens star-forming region. In particular we present a set of criteria for isolating bona fide young stellar objects, YSO's, from the extensive background contamination by extra-galactic objects. We then discuss the properties of the resulting high confidence set of YSO's. We find 235 such objects in the 0.85 deg^2 field that was covered with both IRAC and MIPS. An additional set of 51 lower confidence YSO's outside this area is identified from the MIPS data combined with 2MASS photometry. We describe two sets of results, color-color diagrams to compare our observed source properties with those of theoretical models for star/disk/envelope systems and our own modeling of the subset of our objects that appear to be star+disks. These objects exhibit a very wide range of disk properties, from many that can be fit with actively accreting disks to some with both passive disks and even possibly debris disks. We find that the luminosity function of YSO's in Serpens extends down to at least a few x .001 Lsun or lower for an assumed distance of 260 pc. The lower limit may be set by our inability to distinguish YSO's from extra-galactic sources more than by the lack of YSO's at very low luminosities. A spatial clustering analysis shows that the nominally less-evolved YSO's are more highly clustered than the later stages and that the background extra-galactic population can be fit by the same two-point correlation function as seen in other extra-galactic studies. We also present a table of matches between several previous infrared and X-ray studies of the Serpens YSO population and our Spitzer data set.	우리는 Serpens 항성 형성 영역에 대한 IRAC 및 MIPS의 c2d Spitzer Legacy 관측 데이터 통합 결과를 논의한다. 특히 은하 외부 천체의 광범위한 배경 오염 속에서 진정한 젊은 별 객체(YSO)를 선별하기 위한 기준 집합을 제시하며, 이후 이 YSO 집합의 물리적 특성을 분석한다. IRAC과 MIPS 모두로 관측된 0.85 제곱도 영역 내에서 235개의 YSO를 확인했으며, 이 영역 외부의 MIPS 데이터와 2MASS 측광 데이터를 결합하여 추가로 51개의 저신뢰도 YSO 후보를 식별했다. 본 논문은 두 가지 결과 집합을 제시한다. 첫째, 별-원반-포장 시스템에 대한 이론 모델과 관측 결과를 비교하기 위한 색-색 도표 분석, 둘째, 별과 원반의 조합으로 보이는 객체에 대한 개별 모델링 결과이다. 이 객체들은 활발히 물질을 흡수하는 원반에서부터 수동적 원반, 심지어 잔해 원반에 이르기까지 다양한 원반 특성을 보인다. Serpens 지역 YSO의 광도 함수는 가정된 거리 260pc 기준으로 수 x 0.001 L☉ 이하까지 확장되며, 이 하한은 매우 낮은 광도를 가진 YSO 부족보다는 YSO와 은하 외부 천체 구분 한계에 의해 결정될 수 있다. 공간 집단화 분석 결과, 진화 초기 단계의 YSO가 후기 단계보다 더 강하게 집중되어 있으며, 배경 은하 외부 천체 집합은 다른 은하 외부 연구에서 관측된 것과 동일한 두 점 상관 함수로 설명될 수 있음을 보였다. 또한 본 연구는 Serpens YSO 집단에 대한 기존 적외선 및 X선 연구들과 스피처 데이터셋 간 일치 항목을 정리한 표를 제공한다.	true	Okay, let me tackle this translation. First, I need to make sure I understand the content. It's about astronomical observations of the Serpens star-forming region using IRAC and MIPS data. The main points are criteria for identifying YSOs, their properties, and various analyses like color-color diagrams and luminosity functions. Starting with the first sentence: "We discuss the results from the combined IRAC and MIPS c2d Spitzer Legacy observations of the Serpens star-forming region." I need to translate "IRAC" and "MIPS" as acronyms since they're technical terms. "c2d Spitzer Legacy" should stay in English with Korean explanation if necessary, but maybe just keep it as is since it's a specific project name. "Serpens" is a proper noun, so it stays. Next, "bona fide young stellar objects, YSO's" – "bona fide" translates to "진정한" or "진짜". Since YSO is a technical term, I'll keep it in English but maybe add the Korean translation in parentheses if needed. Wait, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean translations unless it's extremely specialized. Let me check if "YSO" has a standard Korean equivalent. I think it's "젊은 별 객체" or "젊은 항성체". Maybe use "젊은 별 객체(YSO)" first, then just YSO in parentheses if needed later. "extensive background contamination by extra-galactic objects" – "extra-galactic" is "은하 외부" or "은하 외". "Contamination" here is "혼합" or "오염", but "배경 오염" might be better. "high confidence set of YSO's" – "높은 신뢰도를 가진 YSO 집합". "0.85 deg^2 field" – "0.85 제곱도 영역". "2MASS photometry" – "2MASS 측광" since 2MASS is a survey name. "color-color diagrams" – "색-색 도표" or "색상-색상 다이어그램". Maybe "색-색 도표" is more standard. "theoretical models for star/disk/envelope systems" – "별/원반/포장 이론 모델". "actively accreting disks" – "활동적으로 물질을 흡수하는 원반". "passive disks" – "수동적 원반". "debris disks" – "잔해 원반". "luminosity function" – "광도 함수". "few x .001 Lsun" – "수 x 0.001 Lsun". "lower limit may be set by our inability to distinguish" – "하한은 YSO를 은하 외부 물체와 구분하지 못하는 우리의 한계로 인해 결정될 수 있다". "spatial clustering analysis" – "공간 집단화 분석". "two-point correlation function" – "두 점 상관 함수". "table of matches between several previous infrared and X-ray studies" – "이전의 적외선 및 X선 연구 간 일치 항목 표". I need to ensure that technical terms are either translated properly or kept in English if there's no established Korean term. Also, check for proper formatting preservation, like paragraphs and line breaks. Since the original text is a single paragraph, I should keep it as one unless there are logical breaks. However, the user mentioned consolidating arbitrary line breaks, so I should merge sentences where line breaks were just due to formatting. Let me go through each sentence again to ensure accuracy and flow. Also, watch out for units like "deg^2" and "Lsun" – these should be translated as "제곱도" and "L☉" respectively, keeping the symbols. Make sure that all proper nouns like "Spitzer Legacy" and "2MASS" remain in English. Also, terms like "IRAC" and "MIPS" should stay as acronyms since they're instruments. Double-check that the translation maintains the formal academic tone required. Avoid colloquial expressions and ensure that the structure mirrors the original to preserve meaning. Finally, review the entire translation for coherence and readability in Korean, ensuring that technical terms are consistently used and that the content flows logically from one point to the next.
Partial cubes are isometric subgraphs of hypercubes. Structures on a graph defined by means of semicubes, and Djokovi\'{c}'s and Winkler's relations play an important role in the theory of partial cubes. These structures are employed in the paper to characterize bipartite graphs and partial cubes of arbitrary dimension. New characterizations are established and new proofs of some known results are given. The operations of Cartesian product and pasting, and expansion and contraction processes are utilized in the paper to construct new partial cubes from old ones. In particular, the isometric and lattice dimensions of finite partial cubes obtained by means of these operations are calculated.	부분 입방체는 초입방체의 등거리 부분 그래프이다. 반입방체를 통해 정의되는 그래프 상의 구조와 도조비치(Djoković) 및 빙클러(Winkler) 관계식은 부분 입방체 이론에서 중요한 역할을 한다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 구조를 활용하여 임의의 차원을 갖는 이분 그래프와 부분 입방체의 특성을 규명하였다. 새로운 특성화 방법이 제시되며 기존 결과들에 대한 새로운 증명이 제공된다. 카르테시안 곱과 붙이기 연산, 그리고 확장 및 축소 과정이 본 논문에서 기존 부분 입방체로부터 새로운 부분 입방체를 구성하는 데 활용되었다. 특히 이러한 연산을 통해 얻어진 유한 부분 입방체의 등거리 차원 및 격자 차원이 계산되었다.	true	Okay, let's start translating this academic text into Korean. First, I need to understand the content thoroughly. The text discusses partial cubes, their properties, and operations on them. Terms like "isometric subgraphs of hypercubes" are technical, so I should check if there are established Korean equivalents. "Partial cubes" can be translated as "부분 입방체" since "partial" is 부분 and "cubes" is 입방체. "Isometric subgraphs" would be "등거리 부분 그래프" because "isometric" relates to equal distance, hence 등거리. Next, "Djoković's and Winkler's relations" are proper nouns, so I should keep the names as is but add the Korean pronunciation markers. For example, "Djoković" becomes 도조비치의, and "Winkler" becomes 빙클러의. The term "semicubes" might be "반입방체" following the same logic. I need to ensure that technical terms are either translated if there's a standard Korean term or kept in English with parentheses if not. However, since the user mentioned prioritizing Korean translations, I'll go with 반입방체 here. Moving to the operations: "Cartesian product" is "카르테시안 곱", which is a direct translation. "Pasting" could be "붙이기", but in mathematical contexts, it's often transliterated as "패스팅". Wait, but the user said to prioritize Korean. Maybe "붙이기 연산" is better. However, "pasting" in graph theory might not have a standard translation, so perhaps keeping it in English with parentheses is acceptable here. But the instruction says to use English only as a last resort. Let me check if there's a standard term. I think "붙이기" is acceptable. "Expansion and contraction processes" would be "확장 및 축소 과정". "Isometric and lattice dimensions" are "등거리 및 격자 차원". I need to maintain the formal academic tone. Also, ensure that each sentence is translated individually while preserving the flow. The original paragraphs have line breaks that seem arbitrary, so I'll consolidate them into meaningful paragraphs in Korean. For example, the first sentence: "Partial cubes are isometric subgraphs of hypercubes." becomes "부분 입방체는 초입방체의 등거리 부분 그래프이다." Check for any proper nouns that need to be in English. The names Djoković and Winkler should stay as is but with Korean pronunciation. Now, the second paragraph: "The operations of Cartesian product and pasting, and expansion and contraction processes are utilized..." translates to "카르테시안 곱과 패스팅, 그리고 확장 및 축소 과정의 연산이 부분 입방체를 구성하는 데 사용된다." Wait, "pasting" here might need to be checked again. If there's a Korean term, use it; otherwise, maybe use "붙이기 연산" instead of 패스팅. But since it's a specific term in graph theory, perhaps keeping it as 패스팅 in parentheses is better. However, the user's instruction says to prioritize Korean. Let me confirm. In some contexts, "붙이기" is used, so maybe "카르테시안 곱과 붙이기 연산" would be better. Also, "isometric and lattice dimensions of finite partial cubes" becomes "유한 부분 입방체의 등거리 및 격자 차원". I need to ensure that all technical terms are accurately translated and that the sentences flow naturally in Korean academic writing. Each paragraph should be a logical unit, so combining sentences where line breaks were arbitrary in the original. Finally, check for any formatting requirements. Since the original uses italics or other formatting, but the user says to preserve paragraphs and line breaks only if they represent genuine topic shifts. The original seems to have two paragraphs, so I'll maintain that structure. Double-check all translations for accuracy and consistency. Make sure that terms like "semicubes" are consistently translated as 반입방체 throughout. Also, ensure that the relations by Djoković and Winkler are correctly referenced with their names in Korean script. Once all translations are done, review the text to ensure it reads smoothly in Korean without losing the original meaning. Avoid any colloquial expressions and maintain a formal tone. Confirm that all instructions from the user are followed, especially regarding technical terms and formatting.
In this paper we present an algorithm for computing Hecke eigensystems of Hilbert-Siegel cusp forms over real quadratic fields of narrow class number one. We give some illustrative examples using the quadratic field $\Q(\sqrt{5})$. In those examples, we identify Hilbert-Siegel eigenforms that are possible lifts from Hilbert eigenforms.	본 논문에서 우리는 좁은 类수(narrow class number) 1을 갖는 실이차체 상의 힐베르트-지겔 귀족 형식(Hilbert-Siegel cusp forms)의 헤케 고유계(Hecke eigensystems)를 계산하기 위한 알고리즘을 제시한다. 이에 대한 설명을 위해 $\Q(\sqrt{5})$ 이차체를 이용한 몇 가지 예시를 제공한다. 이러한 예시들에서 우리는 힐베르트 고유형식(Hilbert eigenforms)에서 유도된 것으로 추정되는 힐베르트-지겔 고유형식(Hilbert-Siegel eigenforms)을 식별한다.	true	Okay, let's start translating this academic text into Korean while following the strict guidelines provided. First, I need to parse each sentence carefully to ensure accurate translation. The user emphasized preserving technical terms in English unless there's a well-established Korean equivalent. The first sentence mentions "Hecke eigensystems of Hilbert-Siegel cusp forms over real quadratic fields of narrow class number one." Here, terms like "Hecke eigensystems," "Hilbert-Siegel cusp forms," and "narrow class number one" are technical. I should check if these have standard Korean translations. For instance, "Hecke eigensystems" might be translated as 헤케 고유계, but I need to confirm if that's the accepted term. Similarly, "Hilbert-Siegel cusp forms" could be 힐베르트-지겔 귀족 형식. However, if these terms are commonly left in English in Korean academic contexts, I should keep them as is, possibly adding parentheses for clarification if needed. Next, the quadratic field Q(√5) is mentioned. In Korean, this is usually written as Q(√5) without translation, so I'll retain that. The part about identifying Hilbert-Siegel eigenforms that are possible lifts from Hilbert eigenforms needs careful handling. Terms like "eigenforms" and "lifts" are technical. "Eigenforms" might be 고유형식, and "lifts" could be 리프트, but again, checking common usage is important. The guidelines also stress preserving the original structure, including paragraphs and line breaks. The input is a single paragraph, so the translation should maintain that structure. Additionally, I need to ensure that the translation flows naturally in Korean while keeping the formal academic tone. I should also be cautious about the instruction to prioritize Korean translations for terms unless they are extremely specialized. For example, "narrow class number one" might be 좁은 类数 1, but if that's not standard, I might need to keep it in English. However, since class number is a standard term, translating it as "좁은 类수" with "Class number" in parentheses could be appropriate. Another point is the use of mathematical notation like $\Q(\sqrt{5})$. Since the user specified to leave URLs, mathematical expressions, and special markup unchanged, I need to ensure that this notation remains as is. Finally, I need to review the entire translation to ensure that all technical terms are consistently translated, the original meaning is preserved, and the text reads smoothly in Korean without any colloquial expressions. Making sure that each sentence is translated accurately while maintaining the formal structure required for academic writing.
Recently, Bruinier and Ono classified cusp forms $f(z) := \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_f(n)q ^n \in S_{\lambda+1/2}(\Gamma_0(N),\chi)\cap \mathbb{Z}[[q]]$ that does not satisfy a certain distribution property for modulo odd primes $p$. In this paper, using Rankin-Cohen Bracket, we extend this result to modular forms of half integral weight for primes $p \geq 5$. As applications of our main theorem we derive distribution properties, for modulo primes $p\geq5$, of traces of singular moduli and Hurwitz class number. We also study an analogue of Newman's conjecture for overpartitions.	최근에 Bruinier와 Ono는 모듈러 홀수 소수 $p$에 대해 일정한 분포 성질을 만족하지 않는 유尖점 형식 $f(z) := \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_f(n)q ^n \in S_{\lambda+1/2}(\Gamma_0(N),\chi)\cap \mathbb{Z}[[q]]$를 분류하였다. 본 논문에서 우리는 랭킨-코언 브라켓을 사용하여 소수 $p \geq 5$에 대해 반정수 중량의 모듈러 형식으로 이 결과를 확장하였다. 본 논문의 응용으로서, 주정리를 통해 모듈러 소수 $p\geq5$에 대해 특이 모듈러스의 추적과 휴르비츠 유체수의 분포 성질을 도출하였다. 또한 오버파티션에 대한 Newman 추측의 유사한 형태를 연구하였다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation request. The user provided a technical mathematics text that needs to be translated into Korean following specific guidelines. First, I need to understand the content thoroughly to ensure accurate translation. The text discusses a mathematical result by Bruinier and Ono regarding cusp forms and their properties related to distribution modulo odd primes. Then, the paper extends this result using Rankin-Cohen Bracket to modular forms of half-integral weight for primes p ≥ 5. Applications include distribution properties of traces of singular moduli, Hurwitz class numbers, and an analogue of Newman's conjecture for overpartitions. Now, applying the guidelines: 1. Sentence-by-sentence translation: Each sentence must be translated individually. I'll break down the original text into sentences and translate each without altering the structure. 2. Preserve original meaning: Ensure that all technical terms and mathematical concepts are accurately conveyed. Terms like "cusp forms," "modular forms," "Rankin-Cohen Bracket," "singular moduli," "Hurwitz class number," and "Newman's conjecture" need precise Korean equivalents. 3. Technical term handling: Check if these terms have established Korean translations. For example, "cusp forms" is cuspidal form (유尖점 형식), "modular forms" is 모듈러 형식, "Rankin-Cohen Bracket" might be 랭킨-코언 브라켓. Proper nouns like Bruinier and Ono should remain in English. Since the text is academic, prioritize Korean translations unless a term is too obscure. For instance, "traces of singular moduli" could be 특이 모듈러스의 추적, and "Hurwitz class number" is 휴르비츠 유체수. "Newman's conjecture" stays as Newman 추측. Ensure that mathematical notation like $ S_{\lambda+1/2}(\Gamma_0(N),\chi)\cap \mathbb{Z}[[q]] $ remains unchanged. 4. Format preservation: Maintain the original structure, including paragraphs, mathematical expressions, and special characters. The original text has LaTeX equations which should stay as they are. 5. Language register: Use formal academic Korean. Avoid colloquial terms. Ensure sentences are structured properly in Korean, which might involve reordering clauses for natural flow. 6. Line breaks and flow: The original text has line breaks after "a_f(n)q ^n \in S_{\lambda+1/2}(\Gamma_0(N),\chi)\cap \mathbb{Z}[[q]]$" and "modulo odd primes $p$." These are likely due to LaTeX formatting. In Korean, I should merge these lines into a coherent sentence without unnecessary breaks. 7. Code and non-text elements: Leave the mathematical expressions in LaTeX as they are. URLs or code aren't present here, so no issue. 8. Token preservation: Ensure that all special tokens like $ are preserved around mathematical expressions. 9. Completeness: Translate every part. Omit nothing, even if a term is challenging. If a term doesn't have a direct translation, use the English term in parentheses as a last resort, but the guidelines say to prioritize Korean equivalents. For example, "Rankin-Cohen Bracket" might not have a standard translation, so use the English term in parentheses if necessary. However, checking standard math resources, I see that "Rankin-Cohen Bracket" is often left in English or transliterated as 랭킨-코언 브라켓. Since it's a proper noun for a mathematical concept, it's acceptable to use the transliterated term without parentheses. 10. Context independence: Treat this as a standalone translation. No need to reference previous translations. 11. Embedded instructions: There are no instructions within the text, so proceed normally. Now, translating each sentence: First sentence: "Recently, Bruinier and Ono classified cusp forms $f(z) := \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_f(n)q ^n \in S_{\lambda+1/2}(\Gamma_0(N),\chi)\cap \mathbb{Z}[[q]]$ that does not satisfy a certain distribution property for modulo odd primes $p$." - "Recently" → "최근에" - "Bruinier and Ono classified" → "Bruinier와 Ono는 분류하였다" - "cusp forms" → "유尖점 형식" - The equation remains as is. - "does not satisfy a certain distribution property for modulo odd primes $p$" → "모듈러 홀수 소수 $p$에 대해 일정한 분포 성질을 만족하지 않는 경우를 분류하였다." Second sentence: "In this paper, using Rankin-Cohen Bracket, we extend this result to modular forms of half integral weight for primes $p \geq 5$." - "In this paper" → "본 논문에서" - "using Rankin-Cohen Bracket" → "랭킨-코언 브라켓을 사용하여" - "extend this result" → "이 결과를 확장하였다" - "modular forms of half integral weight" → "반정수 중량의 모듈러 형식" - "primes $p \geq 5$" → "소수 $p \geq 5$에 대해" Third sentence: "As applications of our main theorem we derive distribution properties, for modulo primes $p\geq5$, of traces of singular moduli and Hurwitz class number." - "As applications" → "본 논문의 응용으로서" - "main theorem" → "주정리" - "derive distribution properties" → "분포 성질을 도출하였다" - "modulo primes $p\geq5$" → "모듈러 소수 $p\geq5$에 대해" - "traces of singular moduli" → "특이 모듈러스의 추적" - "Hurwitz class number" → "휴르비츠 유체수" Fourth sentence: "We also study an analogue of Newman's conjecture for overpartitions." - "We also study" → "또한 연구하였다" - "analogue" → "유사한" - "Newman's conjecture" → "Newman 추측" - "overpartitions" → "오버파티션" Putting it all together while maintaining the structure and ensuring proper line breaks and formatting. Check that all mathematical notations are preserved and that the translation flows naturally in Korean academic style.
Serre obtained the p-adic limit of the integral Fourier coefficient of modular forms on $SL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ for $p=2,3,5,7$. In this paper, we extend the result of Serre to weakly holomorphic modular forms of half integral weight on $\Gamma_{0}(4N)$ for $N=1,2,4$. A proof is based on linear relations among Fourier coefficients of modular forms of half integral weight. As applications we obtain congruences of Borcherds exponents, congruences of quotient of Eisentein series and congruences of values of $L$-functions at a certain point are also studied. Furthermore, the congruences of the Fourier coefficients of Siegel modular forms on Maass Space are obtained using Ikeda lifting.	세르는 $p=2,3,5,7$에 대해 $SL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ 위의 모듈러 형식의 정수 푸리에 계수의 p진 극한을 구하였다. 본 논문에서는 $N=1,2,4$에 대해 $\Gamma_{0}(4N)$ 위의 반정수 무게를 갖는 약하게 정칙 모듈러 형식으로 세르의 결과를 확장한다. 증명은 반정수 무게의 모듈러 형식 푸리에 계수들 간의 선형 관계에 기반한다. 응용으로 보체르츠 지수의 합동성, 아이젠슈타인 급수의 몫의 합동성, 그리고 특정 점에서 $L$-함수 값의 합동성을 연구하였다. 또한, 마스 공간 위의 지겔 모듈러 형식의 푸리에 계수 합동성은 이케다 리프팅을 통해 얻어진다.	true	Okay, let me start by understanding the user's query. They provided a mathematical text in English and want it translated into Korean following specific guidelines. The text involves concepts like modular forms, p-adic limits, Fourier coefficients, and other advanced math terms. First, I need to ensure that technical terms are handled correctly. According to the instructions, I should prioritize Korean translations for technical terms unless they are extremely specialized. For example, "p-adic limit" should be translated to "p진 극한" or "p-진 극한". I should check if these terms have established Korean equivalents. If not, I might need to keep them in English with parentheses, but only as a last resort. Next, proper nouns like "Serre" and "Borcherds exponents" should remain in English since they are names. However, mathematical concepts named after people, like "Eisenstein series", should be translated as "아이젠슈타인 급수" with the name kept in original form. Looking at the structure, the text has several sentences with mathematical expressions. The user mentioned preserving all formatting, including LaTeX expressions like $SL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ and $\Gamma_{0}(4N)$. These should remain unchanged in the translation. I also need to ensure that the translation is formal and academic, avoiding colloquial language. Each sentence should be translated individually while maintaining the flow. For example, "In this paper, we extend the result of Serre..." becomes "본 논문에서는 세르의 결과를 확장하여..." which is formal and maintains the original meaning. Another point is handling the line breaks and paragraphs. The original text has a few line breaks, but since they seem to be part of the paragraph structure, I should maintain those breaks unless they are arbitrary. The user mentioned consolidating arbitrary line breaks, so I'll check if the breaks here are for formatting or content. Since it's a single paragraph, I'll keep the structure as is, ensuring logical divisions. Terms like "weakly holomorphic modular forms" need careful translation. "약하게 정칙 모듈러 형식" seems appropriate. For "half integral weight", "반정수 무게" is the standard term. Applications mentioned include "congruences of Borcherds exponents" which should be "보체르츠 지수의 합동성" and "Ikeda lifting" as "이케다 리프팅". These are specific terms in the field, so keeping them in English with Korean translations might be necessary, but since the user prefers Korean terms, I'll use the translated versions. I also need to check for any mathematical expressions within the text and ensure they are preserved. For example, $L$-functions should be written as "$L$-함수" in Korean. Finally, reviewing the entire translation to ensure that all technical terms are correctly translated, the structure is preserved, and the language remains formal and academic. Making sure there are no omissions or paraphrasing, and that all elements from the original text are present in the translation.
In this article we discuss a relation between the string topology and differential forms based on the theory of Chen's iterated integrals and the cyclic bar complex.	이 글에서는 천의 반복 적분 이론과 순환 바 복합체 이론을 기반으로 끈 위상수학과 미분 형식 사이의 관계를 논의한다.	true	Okay, let me start by reading the user's query carefully. They want a translation of an academic abstract into Korean, following specific guidelines. The text is about string topology and differential forms, referencing Chen's iterated integrals and the cyclic bar complex. First, I need to ensure each sentence is translated individually while maintaining the flow. The original text is a single sentence split across two lines, so I should treat it as one sentence but check if the line break is arbitrary. Since it's likely a formatting artifact, I'll merge them into a single line in Korean. Next, technical terms: "string topology" and "differential forms" should be translated. "String topology" is commonly translated as "끈 이론 위상수학" in Korean academic contexts. "Differential forms" is "미분 형식". "Chen's iterated integrals" is a proper noun, so it should stay in English but with the Korean translation in parentheses if needed. However, since Chen is a name, it's usually kept as is. "Cyclic bar complex" translates to "순환 바 복합체". I need to check if these terms have established Korean equivalents. "Iterated integrals" would be "반복 적분" but since it's part of Chen's theory, maybe keeping "Chen's iterated integrals" in English with a note is better. However, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean translations unless it's extremely specialized. Since these are academic terms, it's safer to use the Korean equivalents. Formatting: The original has a line break after "and", which is arbitrary. The translation should consolidate into one line. Also, ensure the paragraph structure is maintained. Language register: Formal and professional. Avoid colloquial terms. Make sure the sentence structure is correct in Korean academic writing. Check for any embedded instructions or non-text elements. None here. Now, putting it all together: "In this article we discuss a relation between the string topology and differential forms based on the theory of Chen's iterated integrals and the cyclic bar complex." Translates to: "이 글에서는 천의 반복 적분 이론과 순환 바 복합체 이론을 기반으로 끈 위상수학과 미분 형식 사이의 관계를 논의한다." Wait, "Chen's" should be "천" for the Korean transliteration. "Iterated integrals" is "반복 적분". "Cyclic bar complex" is "순환 바 복합체". "String topology" is "끈 위상수학". "Differential forms" is "미분 형식". Double-checking if "Chen's iterated integrals" is better left in English. Since Chen is a person's name, it's typically kept as "천" in Korean. So "천의 반복 적분" is correct. Make sure the sentence flows naturally in Korean academic style. The structure seems correct. No line breaks needed except the paragraph. I think that's it. Ensure no explanations or notes are added, just the translation.
The pure spinor formulation of the ten-dimensional superstring leads to manifestly supersymmetric loop amplitudes, expressed as integrals in pure spinor superspace. This paper explores different methods to evaluate these integrals and then uses them to calculate the kinematic factors of the one-loop and two-loop massless four-point amplitudes involving two and four Ramond states.	10차원 초끈의 순수 스핀 구조는 순수 스핀 초공간의 적분으로 표현되는 명확하게 초대칭적인 고리 진폭을 유도한다. 본 논문은 이러한 적분을 계산하기 위한 다양한 방법을 탐구하고, 이를 활용하여 두 개와 네 개의 라몽드 상태가 포함된 일환 및 이환 무질량 4점 진폭의 운동학적 인자를 구한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. First, I need to make sure I understand the original text. It's about the pure spinor formulation in superstring theory and how it leads to supersymmetric loop amplitudes. The paper discusses methods to evaluate integrals in pure spinor superspace and applies them to calculate kinematic factors for one-loop and two-loop amplitudes involving Ramond states. Starting with the first sentence: "The pure spinor formulation of the ten-dimensional superstring leads to manifestly supersymmetric loop amplitudes, expressed as integrals in pure spinor superspace." The key terms here are "pure spinor formulation," "ten-dimensional superstring," "manifestly supersymmetric loop amplitudes," and "pure spinor superspace." I should check if these terms have established Korean equivalents. "Pure spinor" is usually kept in English in academic contexts, but maybe "순수 스핀 구조" is a possible translation. However, since the user mentioned to prioritize Korean translations when possible, I need to verify. "Superspace" is often "초공간" in Korean physics literature. "Manifestly supersymmetric" would be "명확하게 초대칭적인." Next, "This paper explores different methods to evaluate these integrals and then uses them to calculate the kinematic factors of the one-loop and two-loop massless four-point amplitudes involving two and four Ramond states." Terms here include "kinematic factors," "one-loop," "two-loop," "massless four-point amplitudes," and "Ramond states." "Kinematic factors" could be "운동학적 인자," "four-point amplitudes" as "4점 진폭," and "Ramond states" as "라몽드 상태." I need to ensure that technical terms are either translated properly or kept in English if there's no established Korean term. For example, "pure spinor" might be transliterated as "퓨어 스핀" but if there's a standard translation, that should be used. However, given the context of theoretical physics, many terms are retained in English. But the user's instruction says to prioritize Korean translations whenever possible. So I need to check each term. "Ten-dimensional superstring" would be "10차원 초끈." "Supersymmetric loop amplitudes" is "초대칭 고리 진폭." "Integrals in pure spinor superspace" could be "퓨어 스핀 초공간의 적분." Wait, but "pure spinor" here is part of the term, so maybe it's better to keep it as is in English. But the user wants Korean translations if possible. Maybe "순수 스핀 구조 초공간의 적분." "Kinematic factors" as "운동학적 인자," "massless four-point amplitudes" as "무질량 4점 진폭," "Ramond states" as "라몽드 상태." Also, the structure of the sentences needs to be maintained. The first sentence is a bit long, so breaking it into two sentences might help readability in Korean. However, the user wants sentence-by-sentence translation. So I should keep each sentence as a single unit but ensure the translation flows naturally. Check for proper grammar and formality. Since it's an academic paper, formal language is necessary. Avoid colloquial expressions. Now, putting it all together. Let me draft the translation: "10차원 초끈의 순수 스핀 구조는 퓨어 스핀 초공간의 적분으로 표현되는 명확하게 초대칭적인 고리 진폭으로 이어진다. 본 논문은 이러한 적분을 평가하기 위한 다양한 방법을 탐구하고, 이를 활용하여 두 개와 네 개의 라몽드 상태가 포함된 일환 및 이환 무질량 4점 진폭의 운동학적 인자를 계산한다." Wait, "pure spinor formulation" is translated as "순수 스핀 구조." But "formulation" might be better as "공식화" or "구조화." Alternatively, "순수 스핀 공식화." However, "pure spinor formulation" is a specific term in physics, so maybe it's better to keep it as "퓨어 스핀 공식화" or check if there's a standard translation. If unsure, keeping it in English with parentheses as per the guidelines. But the user said to prioritize Korean translations. So perhaps "순수 스핀 공식화." Also, "leads to" is "이어진다" but maybe "유도한다" or "결과로 나타낸다." "Manifestly supersymmetric" is "명확하게 초대칭적인." Another check: "evaluates these integrals" is "이러한 적분을 평가하기" but "evaluate" in this context is "계산하다" or "평가하다." "Methods to evaluate" can be "평가 방법." "Kinematic factors" is "운동학적 인자," which is correct. "Ramond states" should be "라몽드 상태" since Ramond is a proper noun from the physicist's name, so it's usually transliterated. I think the translation is accurate, maintaining technical terms with Korean equivalents where possible and keeping the structure. Now, ensure that all formatting is preserved, which in this case is straightforward as there are no special characters or code. The original has two sentences, so the translation should also have two sentences, each corresponding. Also, check that terms like "one-loop" and "two-loop" are translated as "일환" and "이환" which are standard in physics contexts. Yes, this should meet the user's requirements. No markdown, just plain text with proper line breaks. The user mentioned consolidating arbitrary line breaks, but the original text here is two sentences without unnecessary breaks. So the translation is two sentences, each properly structured.
In this work, we evaluate the lifetimes of the doubly charmed baryons $\Xi_{cc}^{+}$, $\Xi_{cc}^{++}$ and $\Omega_{cc}^{+}$. We carefully calculate the non-spectator contributions at the quark level where the Cabibbo-suppressed diagrams are also included. The hadronic matrix elements are evaluated in the simple non-relativistic harmonic oscillator model. Our numerical results are generally consistent with that obtained by other authors who used the diquark model. However, all the theoretical predictions on the lifetimes are one order larger than the upper limit set by the recent SELEX measurement. This discrepancy would be clarified by the future experiment, if more accurate experiment still confirms the value of the SELEX collaboration, there must be some unknown mechanism to be explored.	이 연구에서는 이중 매력 바리온 $\Xi_{cc}^{+}$, $\Xi_{cc}^{++}$ 및 $\Omega_{cc}^{+}$의 수명을 평가합니다. 쿼크 수준에서 비관측자 기여를 면밀하게 계산하였으며, 여기에는 Cabibbo-억제 다이어그램도 포함됩니다. 강입자 행렬 요소는 단순 비상대론적 조화 진동자 모델을 사용하여 평가되었습니다. 우리가 도출한 수치 결과는 다이쿼크 모델을 사용한 다른 연구자들의 결과와 전반적으로 일치합니다. 그러나 수명에 대한 모든 이론적 예측은 최근 SELEX 실험에서 설정한 상한보다 한 자릿수 더 큰 값을 나타냅니다. 이 차이는 향후 실험을 통해 명확히 규명될 것입니다. 보다 정확한 실험 결과가 SELEX 협업의 수치를 계속 확인한다면, 미지의 메커니즘이 존재함을 시사하는 것입니다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. The user wants a precise Korean translation of a physics paper abstract. First, I need to parse the original text carefully. Starting with the first sentence: "In this work, we evaluate the lifetimes of the doubly charmed baryons Ξ_cc⁺, Ξ_cc⁺⁺, and Ω_cc⁺." The terms like "doubly charmed baryons" are technical. I should check if there's a standard Korean translation. If not, keep them in English. The particles' symbols should stay as is. Next, "non-spectator contributions at the quark level" – "non-spectator" here might be "비관측자" in Korean, but I need to confirm if that's the standard term. Also, "Cabibbo-suppressed diagrams" – "Cabibbo" is a proper noun, so it stays. "Suppressed" would be "억제된," so the term might be "Cabibbo-억제 다이어그램." For "hadronic matrix elements," the translation would be "강입자 행렬 요소." The model mentioned is "simple non-relativistic harmonic oscillator model," which translates to "단순 비상대론적 조화 진동자 모델." Looking at the comparison with other authors' work: "diquark model" is another technical term. If "diquark" doesn't have a standard Korean equivalent, it should remain in English. The part about the discrepancy with SELEX measurement: "one order larger" means "한 자릿수 더 큼" in Korean. Also, "upper limit" is "상한," and "discrepancy" would be "불일치" or "차이." I need to ensure that all technical terms are either translated properly or kept in English if there's no standard Korean equivalent. Proper nouns like SELEX stay in English. Also, the structure of the sentences should follow Korean grammar rules, which might mean reordering some phrases. For example, "We carefully calculate the non-spectator contributions..." becomes "비관측자 기여를 면밀하게 계산합니다." Check for consistency in terms like "numerical results" (수치 결과), "theoretical predictions" (이론적 예측), and "future experiment" (향후 실험). Make sure that the final translation flows naturally in Korean while preserving all original meanings and technical details. Avoid any colloquial expressions and maintain a formal academic tone throughout.
Results from spectroscopic observations of the Intermediate Polar (IP) EX Hya in quiescence during 1991 and 2001 are presented. Spin-modulated radial velocities consistent with an outer disc origin were detected for the first time in an IP. The spin pulsation was modulated with velocities near ~500-600 km/s. These velocities are consistent with those of material circulating at the outer edge of the accretion disc, suggesting corotation of the accretion curtain with material near the Roche lobe radius. Furthermore, spin Doppler tomograms have revealed evidence of the accretion curtain emission extending from velocities of ~500 km/s to ~1000 km/s. These findings have confirmed the theoretical model predictions of King & Wynn (1999), Belle et al. (2002) and Norton et al. (2004) for EX Hya, which predict large accretion curtains that extend to a distance close to the Roche lobe radius in this system. Evidence for overflow stream of material falling onto the magnetosphere was observed, confirming the result of Belle et al. (2005) that disc overflow in EX Hya is present during quiescence as well as outburst. It appears that the hbeta and hgamma spin radial velocities originated from the rotation of the funnel at the outer disc edge, while those of halpha were produced due to the flow of material along the field lines far from the white dwarf (narrow component) and close to the white dwarf (broad-base component), in agreement with the accretion curtain model.	중간 극성체(IP) EX Hya의 정상기 동안 1991년과 2001년에 수행된 분광 관측 결과를 제시한다. 외부 원반에서 기원한 것으로 추정되는 스핀 변조 체적 속도가 IP에서 최초로 검출되었다. 스핀 맥동은 약 500-600 km/s의 속도로 변조되었다. 이러한 속도는 물질 흡적 원반 외곽에서 순환하는 물질의 속도와 일치하며, 이 시스템에서 로슈 로브 반지름 근처의 물질과 물질 흡적 커튼의 공동 회전을 시사한다. 또한 스핀 도플러 단층 촬영 영상에서 약 500 km/s에서 약 1000 km/s의 속도 범위에 걸쳐 물질 흡적 커튼 방출의 증거가 밝혀졌다. 이러한 발견은 EX Hya에 대해 King & Wynn(1999), Belle 등(2002), Norton 등(2004)이 제시한 이론적 모델 예측, 즉 이 시스템에서 물질 흡적 커튼이 로슈 로브 반지름에 가까운 거리까지 확장된다는 예측을 확인하였다. 자기권으로 낙하하는 물질의 오버플로우 흐름에 대한 증거가 관측되어, EX Hya에서 정상기뿐만 아니라 폭증기에도 원반 오버플로우가 존재한다는 Belle 등(2005)의 결과를 재확인하였다. Hβ와 Hγ의 스핀 체적 속도는 외부 원반 가장자리의 펀넬 회전에서 기원한 반면, Hα의 속도는 백색 왜성에서 먼 거리(좁은 성분) 및 가까운 거리(넓은 기저 성분)의 자기력선을 따라 흐르는 물질의 흐름에 의해 생성된 것으로, 물질 흡적 커튼 모델과 일치한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. The user provided a detailed scientific text about EX Hya, an Intermediate Polar. First, I need to make sure I understand the content to translate it accurately. Starting with the title: "Results from spectroscopic observations of the Intermediate Polar (IP) EX Hya in quiescence during 1991 and 2001 are presented." The term "Intermediate Polar (IP)" should be kept in English with the acronym, as it's a specific type of cataclysmic variable star. "Quiescence" here refers to a dormant state, so I'll use 정상기 or 휴식기. Maybe 정상기 is better here. Next, "Spin-modulated radial velocities consistent with an outer disc origin were detected for the first time in an IP." "Spin-modulated" would be 스핀 변조된. "Radial velocities" is 체적 속도. "Outer disc" should be 외부 원반. Need to check if there's a standard term in Korean for accretion disc. "Spin pulsation was modulated with velocities near ~500-600 km/s." Spin pulsation is 스핀 맥동. Velocities are 속도, so "~500-600 km/s" stays as is. "Material circulating at the outer edge of the accretion disc" – 물질이 순환하는, 외부 가장자리, 물질은 물질, 순환은 순환. "Accretion disc" is 일반적으로 '물질 흡적 원반' but maybe '물질 흡적 원반' is better. "Suggesting corotation of the accretion curtain with material near the Roche lobe radius." Corotation is 공동 회전, accretion curtain는 물질 흡적 커튼, Roche lobe radius는 로슈 로브 반지름. "Spin Doppler tomograms have revealed evidence of the accretion curtain emission extending from velocities of ~500 km/s to ~1000 km/s." Doppler tomograms는 도플러 단층 촬영 영상. Emission is 방출. So "물질 흡적 커튼 방출의 증거를 보여주었다." "Confirming the theoretical model predictions of King & Wynn (1999), Belle et al. (2002) and Norton et al. (2004) for EX Hya, which predict large accretion curtains that extend to a distance close to the Roche lobe radius in this system." Here, the model predictions need to be accurately translated. "Larger accretion curtains" would be 대규모 물질 흡적 커튼. "Evidence for overflow stream of material falling onto the magnetosphere was observed, confirming the result of Belle et al. (2005) that disc overflow in EX Hya is present during quiescence as well as outburst." Overflow stream는 오버플로우 흐름. Magnetosphere is 자기권. "Disc overflow" is 원반 오버플로우. "Outburst" is 폭증기 or 폭발기. Maybe 폭증기 is better here. "It appears that the hbeta and hgamma spin radial velocities originated from the rotation of the funnel at the outer disc edge, while those of halpha were produced due to the flow of material along the field lines far from the white dwarf (narrow component) and close to the white dwarf (broad-base component), in agreement with the accretion curtain model." Hbeta and Hgamma are spectral lines, so they should stay as Hβ, Hγ. Similarly, Hα stays as Hα. "Funnel" is 펀넬, but maybe '유도 펀넬' or '물질 유도 펀넬' to clarify. "Field lines"는 자기력선. "White dwarf" is 백색 왜성. "Narrow component" and "broad-base component" are 좁은 성분, 넓은 기저 성분. Need to ensure that technical terms are either translated properly or kept in English with parentheses if necessary. For example, "accretion curtain model" would be 물질 흡적 커튼 모델. Also, check if terms like "Roche lobe radius" are commonly translated as 로슈 로브 반지름. Make sure the sentences flow naturally in Korean, maintaining the formal academic tone. Avoid literal translations that might sound awkward. For instance, "were detected for the first time in an IP" could be "최초로 관측되었다" instead of a more literal translation. Check for consistency in terms like "quiescence" and "outburst" throughout the text. Ensure that all proper nouns (names of researchers, years) are preserved as in the original. Also, keep the numerical values and units (km/s) unchanged. Finally, review the entire translation to ensure that all guidelines are followed: sentence-by-sentence translation, preservation of meaning, proper handling of technical terms, formatting, and formal register. Make sure there are no omissions or paraphrasing, and that the translated text is complete and accurate.
We give a prescription for how to compute the Callias index, using as regulator an exponential function. We find agreement with old results in all odd dimensions. We show that the problem of computing the dimension of the moduli space of self-dual strings can be formulated as an index problem in even-dimensional (loop-)space. We think that the regulator used in this Letter can be applied to this index problem.	우리는 지수 함수를 정규화 인자로 사용하여 Callias 인덱스를 계산하는 방법을 제시한다. 홀수 차원에서 이전의 모든 결과와 일치함을 확인하였다. 자기쌍대 끈의 모듈리 공간 차원을 계산하는 문제를 짝수 차원(루프 공간)에서의 인덱스 문제로 공식화할 수 있음을 보였다. 이 레터에서 사용된 정규화 인자를 이 인덱스 문제에 적용할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.	true	Okay, I need to translate this academic text into Korean following the strict guidelines provided. Let me start by reading through the original text carefully to understand the context and key terms. The text discusses computing the Callias index using an exponential regulator, mentions agreement with old results in odd dimensions, and relates the moduli space of self-dual strings to an index problem in even-dimensional space. There are technical terms like "Callias index," "moduli space," and "self-dual strings." First, I'll break it down sentence by sentence. The first sentence: "We give a prescription for how to compute the Callias index, using as regulator an exponential function." The term "Callias index" should probably stay in English since it's a specific term. "Regulator" here is a technical term in physics, so maybe "정규화 인자" or just "정규화기" but I think "정규화 인자" is more precise. "Exponential function" can be translated as "지수 함수." Next sentence: "We find agreement with old results in all odd dimensions." "Odd dimensions" is "홀수 차원에서." Need to ensure the translation maintains the mathematical context. Third sentence: "We show that the problem of computing the dimension of the moduli space of self-dual strings can be formulated as an index problem in even-dimensional (loop-)space." "Moduli space" is "모듈리 공간," and "self-dual strings" would be "자기쌍대 끈." The term "loop-space" is in parentheses, so maybe keep "루프 공간" but check if there's a standard translation. Since it's in parentheses, perhaps it's a clarification, so include it as "(루프 공간)." Last part: "We think that the regulator used in this Letter can be applied to this index problem." "Letter" here refers to a scientific letter, so "이 레터에서 사용된 정규화 인자" would be appropriate. Now, checking technical terms. "Callias index" doesn't have a widely established Korean term, so keeping it in English is acceptable per the guidelines. "Moduli space" is commonly translated as "모듈리 공간," so that's okay. "Self-dual" is "자기쌍대," which is the standard translation. "Loop-space" might be "루프 공간" but since it's in parentheses, it's probably a specific term, so leave as "(루프 공간)." Need to ensure formal academic tone. Avoid colloquial expressions. Maintain sentence structure as per the original but ensure flow in Korean. Also, check for any line breaks or formatting, but since there are none, just translate each sentence as a paragraph. Putting it all together, making sure each sentence is translated accurately while preserving the meaning. Let me verify each part again. Yes, technical terms are handled correctly, English is used only where necessary, and the structure is maintained. The final translation should be clear and adhere to the guidelines.
In this note we give a new method for getting a series of approximations for the extinction probability of the one-dimensional contact process by using the Gr\"obner basis.	이 노트에서 우리는 그뢰브너 기저를 사용하여 1차원 접촉 과정의 소멸 확률에 대한 근사값들의 수열을 얻는 새로운 방법을 제시한다.	true	Okay, let me tackle this translation. The user provided a note about a new method for approximating the extinction probability of a one-dimensional contact process using Gröbner basis. First, I need to make sure I understand the technical terms here. "Extinction probability" in this context refers to the likelihood that a certain process dies out, which in Korean would be "소멸 확률". The "one-dimensional contact process" is a term from probability theory, so I should check if there's a standard Korean translation for that. It seems like "1차원 접촉 과정" is the direct translation, and I think that's commonly used. Next, "Gröbner basis" is a proper noun from mathematics. Even though there's a Korean translation, it's often kept in English with the umlaut, so "Gröbner 기저" or maybe "그뢰브너 기저" if they use the Korean pronunciation. But the user's instruction says to prioritize Korean translations unless it's extremely specialized. Let me verify. In academic papers, sometimes they use the English term, but since the user wants Korean unless necessary, I should go with "그뢰브너 기저" but check if that's standard. Alternatively, maybe "Gröbner 기저" is acceptable with the diacritics. However, since the original has the umlaut, but in Korean, it's often written as 그뢰브너. So I'll use "그뢰브너 기저". Now, the structure of the sentence. The original says "In this note we give a new method..." which translates to "이 노트에서 우리는... 제시한다." But in formal academic writing, "논문" might be more appropriate than "노트" depending on context. However, the original says "note", so "노트" is correct here. "series of approximations" would be "근사값들의 수열" or "근사의 수열". "Approximations" here refers to the sequence of approximate values, so "근사값들의 수열" seems accurate. Putting it all together: "이 노트에서 우리는 그뢰브너 기저를 사용하여 1차원 접촉 과정의 소멸 확률에 대한 근사값들의 수열을 얻는 새로운 방법을 제시한다." I should check if "contact process" is indeed "접촉 과정". Yes, that's the standard term in probability theory. Also, the user mentioned preserving formatting, but there's no special formatting here except the Gröbner with the umlaut. In Korean, the diacritics are usually omitted when transliterated, so "그뢰브너" is correct. No line breaks needed here since the original is a single sentence. Ensure the sentence flows naturally in Korean academic style. Double-check technical terms again. Looks good. The translation maintains the original meaning, uses appropriate terminology, and follows the structure as per guidelines.
The shape of the hadronic form factor f+(q2) in the decay D0 --> K- e+ nue has been measured in a model independent analysis and compared with theoretical calculations. We use 75 fb(-1) of data recorded by the BABAR detector at the PEPII electron-positron collider. The corresponding decay branching fraction, relative to the decay D0 --> K- pi+, has also been measured to be RD = BR(D0 --> K- e+ nue)/BR(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.927 +/- 0.007 +/- 0.012. From these results, and using the present world average value for BR(D0 --> K- pi+), the normalization of the form factor at q2=0 is determined to be f+(0)=0.727 +/- 0.007 +/- 0.005 +/- 0.007 where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and from external inputs, respectively.	하드론 형태 인자 f+(q²)의 형태는 D⁰ → K⁻ e⁺ νₑ 붕괴에서 모델 독립적 분석을 통해 측정되었으며 이론적 계산과 비교되었다. 본 연구에서는 PEPII 전자-양전자 충돌장치에 설치된 BABAR 탐지기가 수집한 75 펨토반⁻¹의 데이터를 사용하였다. 해당 붕괴 분기율은 D⁰ → K⁻ π⁺ 붕괴에 대한 상대적 값으로 측정되어 R_D = BR(D⁰ → K⁻ e⁺ νₑ)/BR(D⁰ → K⁻ π⁺) = 0.927 ± 0.007 ± 0.012로 나타났다. 이 결과와 현재의 세계 평균 BR(D⁰ → K⁻ π⁺) 값을 이용하여 q²=0에서의 형태 인자 정규화 값을 f+(0)=0.727 ± 0.007 ± 0.005 ± 0.007로 결정하였다. 여기서 불확실성은 통계적, 계통적, 외부 입력에서 기인한 불확실성을 각각 나타낸다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. The user provided a physics-related text about hadronic form factors in a decay process. First, I need to make sure I understand the technical terms here. Terms like "hadronic form factor f+(q2)", "model independent analysis", and "branching fraction" are crucial. Since the instruction says to prioritize Korean translations for technical terms unless they're too specialized, I should check if these have established Korean equivalents. Starting with "hadronic form factor f+(q2)", I recall that "form factor" in physics is often translated as "형태 인자" in Korean. "Hadronic" would be "하드론의", so combining them as "하드론 형태 인자 f+(q²)" makes sense. The decay process "D0 --> K- e+ nue" should stay in symbols since those are standard particle notations. Next, "model independent analysis" – "모델에 의존하지 않는 분석" seems correct, but maybe "모델 독립적 분석" is more concise and commonly used. I'll go with "모델 독립적 분석" to keep it natural. Looking at "branching fraction", the term in Korean is usually "분기 비율" or "분기율". Here, since it's a ratio relative to another decay, "분기율" fits well. The notation "RD = BR(D0 --> K- e+ nue)/BR(D0 --> K- pi+)" should remain unchanged as per the guidelines for formulas and symbols. The value "0.927 +/- 0.007 +/- 0.012" needs to be presented correctly, keeping the error terms. In Korean academic writing, the plus-minus symbol is used similarly, so that's straightforward. For "normalization of the form factor at q2=0", "정규화" is the term for normalization. The phrase "determined to be f+(0)=0.727 +/- 0.007 +/- 0.005 +/- 0.007" should be translated with attention to the uncertainties. The explanation about the uncertainties being statistical, systematic, and external inputs needs precise terms: "통계적 불확실성", "계통적 불확실성", and "외부 입력에서 기인한 불확실성". I should also check the units and notation like "75 fb(-1)" – "fb" is femtobarn, which in Korean is "펨토반", so "75 펨토반⁻¹" would be correct. The detector name "BABAR" and the collider "PEPII" should remain in English as proper nouns. The sentence structure in Korean might need reordering for natural flow, but the guidelines emphasize maintaining the original meaning. So each sentence should be translated individually, ensuring that the technical details are preserved without adding or omitting information. Lastly, ensuring that all formatting like paragraphs, line breaks, and special characters are maintained as per the original. Since the input is a single paragraph, I'll keep it as one in Korean, making sure that the technical terms are accurately translated while keeping the structure intact.
Spatiotemporal pattern formation in a product-activated enzymic reaction at high enzyme concentrations is investigated. Stochastic simulations show that catalytic turnover cycles of individual enzymes can become coherent and that complex wave patterns of molecular synchronization can develop. The analysis based on the mean-field approximation indicates that the observed patterns result from the presence of Hopf and wave bifurcations in the considered system.	시공간적 패턴 형성은 고농도 효소 조건에서 제품 활성화 효소 반응에서 연구되었다. 확률적 시뮬레이션은 개별 효소의 촉매 전환 주기가 동조화될 수 있으며 복잡한 분자 동기화 파동 패턴이 발전할 수 있음을 보여준다. 평균장 근사에 기반한 분석은 관찰된 패턴이 고려된 시스템에서 Hopf 분기 및 파동 분기의 존재로 인해 발생함을 나타낸다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation request. The user wants a precise Korean translation of a scientific abstract about spatiotemporal pattern formation in enzymatic reactions. First, I need to parse the original text carefully to understand the technical terms and concepts involved. The title mentions "Spatiotemporal pattern formation" which should be translated as "시공간적 패턴 형성" in Korean. The phrase "product-activated enzymic reaction" refers to an enzymatic reaction activated by the product, so "제품 활성화 효소 반응" seems appropriate. "High enzyme concentrations" would be "고농도 효소 조건에서". Next, the first sentence of the abstract: "Stochastic simulations show..." translates to "확률적 시뮬레이션은... 보여준다". The term "catalytic turnover cycles" here is "촉매 전환 주기". The word "coherent" in this context might be "동조화될 수 있다" to convey coherence in the cycles. "Complex wave patterns of molecular synchronization" needs to be accurately translated; "복잡한 분자 동기화 파동 패턴" seems right. Moving to the second part: "The analysis based on the mean-field approximation..." becomes "평균장 근사에 기반한 분석은... 나타낸다". "Hopf and wave bifurcations" are technical terms. "Hopf 분기" is commonly used in Korean literature, and "파동 분기" for wave bifurcations. The system mentioned is "고려된 시스템" which translates to "considered system". I need to ensure that all technical terms are correctly translated without unnecessary English parentheticals. For example, "mean-field approximation" is well-known as "평균장 근사" in Korean scientific contexts, so no need to add the English term. Similarly, "Hopf bifurcation" is established as "Hopf 분기" in dynamical systems theory, so keeping it in Korean is better. Also, the structure of the sentences should follow Korean grammar rules. In Korean, the verb comes at the end, so I'll adjust the sentence structure accordingly. For example, "Stochastic simulations show that..." becomes "확률적 시뮬레이션은... 보여준다" where the verb "보여준다" is at the end. I should check for any possible misinterpretations. The phrase "complex wave patterns of molecular synchronization" might be tricky, but "복잡한 분자 동기화 파동 패턴" clearly conveys the intended meaning. Also, ensuring that the translation flows smoothly while maintaining the formal and academic tone required for such a paper. Lastly, verifying that all formatting aspects like line breaks and paragraphs are preserved as per the original. Since the original text is a single paragraph, the translation should also be in one paragraph without unnecessary line breaks. Making sure that technical terms are consistently translated throughout and that the overall meaning remains intact without any omissions or additions.
We present Lie group integrators for nonlinear stochastic differential equations with non-commutative vector fields whose solution evolves on a smooth finite dimensional manifold. Given a Lie group action that generates transport along the manifold, we pull back the stochastic flow on the manifold to the Lie group via the action, and subsequently pull back the flow to the corresponding Lie algebra via the exponential map. We construct an approximation to the stochastic flow in the Lie algebra via closed operations and then push back to the Lie group and then to the manifold, thus ensuring our approximation lies in the manifold. We call such schemes stochastic Munthe-Kaas methods after their deterministic counterparts. We also present stochastic Lie group integration schemes based on Castell--Gaines methods. These involve using an underlying ordinary differential integrator to approximate the flow generated by a truncated stochastic exponential Lie series. They become stochastic Lie group integrator schemes if we use Munthe-Kaas methods as the underlying ordinary differential integrator. Further, we show that some Castell--Gaines methods are uniformly more accurate than the corresponding stochastic Taylor schemes. Lastly we demonstrate our methods by simulating the dynamics of a free rigid body such as a satellite and an autonomous underwater vehicle both perturbed by two independent multiplicative stochastic noise processes.	리 군 적분기를 제시한다. 이는 비가환 벡터장이 존재하는 비선형 확률 미분방정식에 대해 매끄러운 유한 차원 다양체 상에서 해가 진화하는 경우를 다룬다. 다양체 상에서의 이동을 생성하는 리 군 작용이 주어졌을 때, 우리는 이 작용을 통해 다양체 상의 확률적 흐름을 리 군으로 당겨올린다(pull back). 이후 지수 사상(exponential map)을 통해 해당 흐름을 대응하는 리 대수로 다시 당겨온다. 우리는 닫힌 연산을 통해 리 대수 상의 확률적 흐름에 대한 근사식을 구성한 다음, 이를 다시 리 군으로 그리고 다양체로 밀어낸다(push back). 이는 근사 해가 다양체 상에 존재하도록 보장하기 위함이다. 우리는 이러한 체계를 확정적(counterpart) 버전인 Munthe-Kaas 방법에 빗따라 확률적 Munthe-Kaas 방법이라 명명한다. 또한 우리는 Castell--Gaines 방법을 기반으로 한 확률 리 군 적분 체계도 제시한다. 이는 절단된 확률 지수 리 급수(truncated stochastic exponential Lie series)가 생성하는 흐름을 근사하기 위해 기반 상미분방정식 적분기를 활용한다. 이러한 체계는 기반 적분기로 Munthe-Kaas 방법을 사용할 경우 확률 리 군 적분기 체계가 된다. 추가로 우리는 일부 Castell--Gaines 방법이 대응하는 확률 테일러 체계보다 전반적으로 더 정확함을 보인다. 마지막으로, 위성과 자율 잠수체와 같이 두 개의 독립적 승법적 확률 잡음 과정에 의해 교란된 자유 강체의 동역학 시뮬레이션을 통해 제시된 방법들을 실증한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation request. The user wants a precise academic translation of a technical text about Lie group integrators for stochastic differential equations into Korean. First, I need to make sure I understand the content thoroughly to maintain the technical accuracy. The original text is dense with mathematical terms like "Lie group integrators," "nonlinear stochastic differential equations," and "non-commutative vector fields." I should check if these terms have established Korean equivalents. For instance, "Lie group" is typically "리 군" in Korean, but sometimes written as "리 군" without translation. However, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean translations unless the term is extremely specialized. Since these are standard terms in mathematics, I'll use their Korean equivalents. Next, there's mention of "Castell--Gaines methods" and "Munthe-Kaas methods." Proper nouns like these usually remain in English, but the user's instruction says to keep them in English only if they're highly specialized. Since these are specific methods named after people, I should keep them as is, possibly adding the Korean pronunciation in parentheses if needed, but the guidelines say to avoid that unless absolutely necessary. So, I'll keep them in English. The text also includes technical phrases like "stochastic flow," "exponential map," and "truncated stochastic exponential Lie series." For these, I need to ensure that the translations are accurate. "Exponential map" is "지수 사상" in Korean, which is the standard term. "Stochastic flow" would be "확률적 흐름" or "확률 흐름," but "stochastic" in academic contexts is often "확률적." I need to be careful with the structure. The user emphasized sentence-by-sentence translation while maintaining flow. The original has complex sentences, so breaking them down into Korean sentences without losing meaning is crucial. For example, the sentence starting with "Given a Lie group action..." is quite long. Translating it into Korean requires splitting it into shorter sentences if necessary, but the guidelines say to translate each sentence individually. However, the example response seems to keep the structure intact, so I'll follow that approach. Another point is the preservation of formatting. The original text doesn't have special formatting like bullet points or code, so that's straightforward. However, there are mathematical expressions like "Castell--Gaines methods" with an en-dash; I should ensure that the dash is preserved correctly in Korean, which usually uses the same en-dash. The conclusion mentions simulating the dynamics of a free rigid body, like a satellite and an underwater vehicle, with stochastic noise. Terms like "free rigid body" translate to "자유 강체," and "multiplicative stochastic noise processes" would be "승법적 확률적 잡음 과정." Ensuring these terms are correctly translated is vital for the academic integrity of the translation. I also need to check for consistency in terminology throughout the translation. For example, using the same Korean term for "integrator" each time it appears. "Integrator" in this context might be "적분기" but in mathematical methods, it's often "적분 방식" or "적분법." The example response uses "적분기," so I'll follow that. Lastly, the user wants the output to be only the translated text without any explanations or notes. So after translating, I must review to ensure no additional content is added and that all technical terms are accurately rendered in Korean, adhering strictly to the guidelines provided.
The very nature of the solar chromosphere, its structuring and dynamics, remains far from being properly understood, in spite of intensive research. Here we point out the potential of chromospheric observations at millimeter wavelengths to resolve this long-standing problem. Computations carried out with a sophisticated dynamic model of the solar chromosphere due to Carlsson and Stein demonstrate that millimeter emission is extremely sensitive to dynamic processes in the chromosphere and the appropriate wavelengths to look for dynamic signatures are in the range 0.8-5.0 mm. The model also suggests that high resolution observations at mm wavelengths, as will be provided by ALMA, will have the unique property of reacting to both the hot and the cool gas, and thus will have the potential of distinguishing between rival models of the solar atmosphere. Thus, initial results obtained from the observations of the quiet Sun at 3.5 mm with the BIMA array (resolution of 12 arcsec) reveal significant oscillations with amplitudes of 50-150 K and frequencies of 1.5-8 mHz with a tendency toward short-period oscillations in internetwork and longer periods in network regions. However higher spatial resolution, such as that provided by ALMA, is required for a clean separation between the features within the solar atmosphere and for an adequate comparison with the output of the comprehensive dynamic simulations.	태양 크로모스피어의 본질적 구조와 역학은 여전히 충분히 이해되지 않은 상태이며, 이에 대한 연구는 활발히 진행되고 있음에도 불구하고 여전히 많은 미해결 과제가 남아 있다. 본 연구에서는 밀리미터 파장 대역에서의 크로모스피어 관측이 이러한 오랜 문제를 해결할 수 있는 가능성을 제시한다. Carlsson과 Stein이 개발한 정교한 태양 크로모스피어 동적 모델을 활용한 계산 결과에 따르면, 밀리미터 파장 대역의 복사는 크로모스피어 내 동역학적 과정에 극도로 민감하게 반응하며, 동적 특성을 탐지하기에 적합한 파장 범위는 0.8-5.0mm로 나타났다. 이 모델은 또한 ALMA가 제공할 고해상도 밀리미터 관측이 고온 및 저온 가스 모두에 반응하는 독특한 특성을 지니고 있어, 태양 대기의 경쟁 모델들 간 구별이 가능할 것임을 시사한다. 실제로 BIMA 어레이를 이용해 조용한 태양을 3.5mm 파장에서 관측한 초기 결과(해상도 12각초)는 50-150K의 진폭과 1.5-8mHz의 주파수를 갖는 상당한 진동 현상을 보여주었으며, 이는 인터네트워크 지역에서는 단주기 진동이, 네트워크 지역에서는 장주기 진동이 우세함을 나타낸다. 그러나 태양 대기 내 구조적 특성을 명확히 구분하고 종합적인 동적 시뮬레이션 결과와 적절히 비교하기 위해서는 ALMA가 제공하는 더 높은 공간 해상도가 필수적이다.	true	Okay, I need to translate this scientific text about the solar chromosphere into Korean. Let me start by reading through the entire passage to understand the context and main points. The first sentence mentions the solar chromosphere's structuring and dynamics not being well understood despite research. I should make sure terms like "solar chromosphere" are correctly translated. The term "chromosphere" is typically translated as "크로모스피어" in Korean, but sometimes left in English. Since the instruction says to prioritize Korean translations for terms, I'll use "크로모스피어" but check if there's an established Korean term. Maybe "태양 크로모스피어" for clarity. Next, the text talks about millimeter wavelengths resolving the problem. "Millimeter wavelength" should be "밀리미터 파장" or "밀리미터 파장 대역". The term "dynamic processes" would be "동역학적 과정들". The names Carlsson and Stein are proper nouns, so they stay as is. The model they developed is referred to as "정교한 동적 모델", so "정교한 동적 모델" is appropriate. The part about ALMA and BIMA array: ALMA is an acronym, so it's kept as ALMA. BIMA array is a proper noun too. The resolution is "12 arcsec", which in Korean is "12각초". The frequencies mentioned are in mHz, which is "밀리헤르츠". Terms like "internetwork" and "network regions" in the solar context might need to be translated literally or kept in English. Since these are specific terms, maybe "인터네트워크" and "네트워크 지역" with explanations if needed, but the instruction says to use Korean equivalents if possible. I need to check technical terms for their standard Korean translations. For example, "high resolution observations" becomes "고해상도 관측". "Comprehensive dynamic simulations" would be "포괄적인 동역학 시뮬레이션". The sentence structure in Korean should maintain the formal academic tone. Also, ensuring that the translation flows well even after consolidating line breaks. The original has some line breaks that seem like paragraph breaks, so I'll maintain those as logical divisions. For numbers and units, like "0.8-5.0 mm" becomes "0.8-5.0mm", keeping the units as is but using Korean spacing if needed. "50-150 K" is "50-150K" in Korean. The mention of "quiet Sun" is a specific term, so "조용한 태양" would be the translation. I need to ensure that all technical terms are accurately translated without unnecessary English parentheticals. Only if a term is too obscure or specific, then add the English in parentheses. For example, if "internetwork" doesn't have a standard translation, maybe "인터네트워크(내부망)" but probably "인터네트워크" is acceptable as is. Also, check for consistency in terms like "dynamic signatures" which could be "동적 특성" or "동역학적 특성". Finally, review the entire translation to ensure that all formatting markers are preserved, paragraphs are logically divided, and the meaning remains accurate. Make sure that the translation is formal and suitable for an academic context without colloquial expressions.
The formation of quasi-2D spin-wave waveforms in longitudinally magnetized stripes of ferrimagnetic film was observed by using time- and space-resolved Brillouin light scattering technique. In the linear regime it was found that the confinement decreases the amplitude of dynamic magnetization near the lateral stripe edges. Thus, the so-called effective dipolar pinning of dynamic magnetization takes place at the edges. In the nonlinear regime a new stable spin wave packet propagating along a waveguide structure, for which both transversal instability and interaction with the side walls of the waveguide are important was observed. The experiments and a numerical simulation of the pulse evolution show that the shape of the formed waveforms and their behavior are strongly influenced by the confinement.	준-2차원 스핀 파동 파형이 페리자성 필름의 종방향으로 자화된 스트라이프 내에서 형성되는 현상이 시간 및 공간 해상도를 갖춘 브릴루앙 산란 기법을 사용하여 관측되었다. 선형 영역에서는 구속 효과로 인해 스트라이프의 측면 가장자리 근처 동적 자화의 진폭이 감소함을 확인하였다. 따라서 이른바 유효 쌍극자 고정 효과가 가장자리에서 발생한다. 비선형 영역에서는 횡방향 불안정성과 파동 유도의 측벽과의 상호작용이 모두 중요한 역할을 하는 파동 유도 구조를 따라 전파되는 새로운 안정한 스핀 파동 패킷이 관측되었다. 실험 및 펄스 진화에 대한 수치 시뮬레이션을 통해 형성된 파형의 형태와 거동이 구속 효과에 의해 강하게 영향을 받음을 확인하였다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation request. The user provided a technical physics text about spin-wave waveforms in ferrimagnetic films. First, I need to ensure that all technical terms are accurately translated into Korean while following the guidelines. Starting with the first sentence: "The formation of quasi-2D spin-wave waveforms..." The term "quasi-2D" should probably stay in English since it's a technical term, but maybe there's a Korean equivalent. Wait, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean translations unless it's extremely specialized. I should check if "준-2차원" is the correct term for quasi-2D. Yes, that's commonly used in Korean scientific contexts. Next, "longitudinally magnetized stripes of ferrimagnetic film." "Longitudinally magnetized" would be "종방향으로 자화된," and "ferrimagnetic film" is "페리자성 필름." Stripes here are "스트라이프." Need to make sure these terms are standard in Korean physics literature. The Brillouin light scattering technique: "브릴루앙 산란 기법." I think that's correct. Time- and space-resolved might be "시간 및 공간 분해능이 있는" or "시간 및 공간 해상도를 갖춘." The user mentioned avoiding English unless necessary, so using the Korean translation here is better. In the linear regime, "선형 영역에서" is straightforward. Terms like "dynamic magnetization" translate to "동적 자화." The phrase "effective dipolar pinning" needs careful handling. If there's no established Korean term, I might keep it in English with parentheses. But checking, "유효 쌍극자 고정" seems to be the standard translation. Moving to the nonlinear regime section: "비선형 영역에서" is correct. "Spin wave packet" would be "스핀 파동 패킷." The user emphasized preserving structure, so bullet points or line breaks should stay, but in this case, the original is paragraphs. Need to ensure line breaks are logical. The sentence about transversal instability and interaction with side walls: "횡방향 불안정성" and "파동 유도의 측벽과의 상호작용" seem accurate. The part about numerical simulation: "수치 시뮬레이션" is correct. The last sentence mentions confinement's influence. "구속" is the term for confinement here. I should also check for any proper nouns or terms that shouldn't be translated, but in this text, most are technical terms that have Korean equivalents. Need to make sure that the flow is maintained, and sentences are translated individually without losing meaning. Also, ensure that paragraphs are kept as in the original, with appropriate line breaks for readability in Korean. Avoid any colloquial expressions, keeping it formal and academic. Finally, verify that all special characters and formatting are preserved as per the guidelines.
We present recent advances in understanding of the ground and excited states of the electron-phonon coupled systems obtained by novel methods of Diagrammatic Monte Carlo and Stochastic Optimization, which enable the approximation-free calculation of Matsubara Green function in imaginary times and perform unbiased analytic continuation to real frequencies. We present exact numeric results on the ground state properties, Lehmann spectral function and optical conductivity of different strongly correlated systems: Frohlich polaron, Rashba-Pekar exciton-polaron, pseudo Jahn-Teller polaron, exciton, and interacting with phonons hole in the t-J model.	최근 다이어그램 몬테카를로(Diagrammatic Monte Carlo) 및 확률적 최적화(Stochastic Optimization)라는 새로운 방법을 통해 전자-포논 결합 시스템의 기저 상태 및 들뜬 상태에 대한 이해에서 이루어진 진전을 제시한다. 이러한 방법들은 허수 시간에서 마츠바라 그린 함수(Matsubara Green function)의 근사 없는 계산을 가능하게 하며, 실수 주파수로의 편향 없는 해석적 확장을 수행한다. 우리는 프레히히 폴론(Frohlich polaron), 라시바-페카르 엑시톤-폴론(Rashba-Pekar exciton-polaron), 유사 얀-텔러 폴론(pseudo Jahn-Teller polaron), 엑시톤(exciton), 그리고 t-J 모델에서 포논과 상호작용하는 홀(hole)과 같은 다양한 강상관 시스템의 기저 상태 특성, 레만 스펙트럼 함수(Lehmann spectral function) 및 광학 전도도에 대한 정확한 수치적 결과를 제시한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. First, I need to understand the original text thoroughly. It's about recent advances in electron-phonon coupled systems using specific methods. The key terms here are "Diagrammatic Monte Carlo," "Stochastic Optimization," "Matsubara Green function," and various system names like "Frohlich polaron" and "t-J model." Starting with the first sentence: "We present recent advances in understanding of the ground and excited states of the electron-phonon coupled systems obtained by novel methods of Diagrammatic Monte Carlo and Stochastic Optimization..." I need to make sure that technical terms like "Diagrammatic Monte Carlo" and "Stochastic Optimization" are kept in English as per the guidelines, but check if they have established Korean equivalents. Since these are specific methods, it's safer to leave them in English. Next part: "which enable the approximation-free calculation of Matsubara Green function in imaginary times and perform unbiased analytic continuation to real frequencies." "Matsubara Green function" is a technical term in physics, so it should stay in English. The same applies to "imaginary times" and "real frequencies." Moving on to the second sentence: "We present exact numeric results on the ground state properties, Lehmann spectral function and optical conductivity of different strongly correlated systems: Frohlich polaron, Rashba-Pekar exciton-polaron, pseudo Jahn-Teller polaron, exciton, and interacting with phonons hole in the t-J model." Here, "Lehmann spectral function" and "optical conductivity" are technical terms. "Frohlich polaron," "Rashba-Pekar exciton-polaron," "pseudo Jahn-Teller polaron," "exciton," and "t-J model" are all specific terms. The phrase "interacting with phonons hole" refers to a hole interacting with phonons in the t-J model. I need to ensure that each of these terms is either translated if there's a standard Korean equivalent or kept in English otherwise. For example, "exciton" might be "엑시톤" in Korean, but if it's commonly used in English in academic contexts, it should stay. Similarly, "t-J model" is a model name, so it's better to keep it as is. I also need to check for proper formatting. The original text uses colons to list the systems, so the translation should preserve that structure. Another consideration is the flow and sentence structure in Korean. Since the original is quite technical, the translation must maintain the formal academic tone. Each sentence should be translated individually but ensuring that the overall meaning remains intact. I should also verify if terms like "ground state properties" and "strongly correlated systems" have established Korean translations. Typically, these would be "기저 상태 특성" and "강하게 상관된 시스템," respectively. Lastly, ensuring that the translation adheres to the guidelines of not adding any explanations or notes, just the translated text. Also, checking for any embedded instructions or special formatting that needs to be preserved. Once all these points are addressed, the translation should accurately convey the original message while following the strict guidelines provided.
Zero-divisors (ZDs) derived by Cayley-Dickson Process (CDP) from N-dimensional hypercomplex numbers (N a power of 2, at least 4) can represent singularities and, as N approaches infinite, fractals -- and thereby,scale-free networks. Any integer greater than 8 and not a power of 2 generates a meta-fractal or "Sky" when it is interpreted as the "strut constant" (S) of an ensemble of octahedral vertex figures called "Box-Kites" (the fundamental building blocks of ZDs). Remarkably simple bit-manipulation rules or "recipes" provide tools for transforming one fractal genus into others within the context of Wolfram's Class 4 complexity.	케일리-디킨슨 과정(CDP)을 통해 N차원 초복소수(N은 2의 거듭제곱이며 최소 4 이상)에서 유도된 영인자(ZD)는 특이점을 나타낼 수 있으며, N이 무한대로 커질 때 프랙탈과 이에 따라 스케일-프리 네트워크를 표현할 수 있다. 8보다 크고 2의 거듭제곱이 아닌 모든 정수는 '스트럿 상수(S)'로 해석될 때 '박스-카이트'라고 불리는 팔면체 꼭짓점 도형들의 집합에서 생성되는 메타-프랙탈 또는 '스카이'를 형성한다. 울프람의 4급 복잡성 체계 내에서 한 프랙탈 유형을 다른 유형으로 전환하는 데 활용할 수 있는 놀랄 정도로 간단한 비트 조작 규칙 또는 '레시피'가 존재한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation request. The user wants a precise Korean translation of a technical text about Zero-divisors and related mathematical concepts. First, I need to parse the original text carefully to understand all the terms and concepts involved. Starting with the first sentence: "Zero-divisors (ZDs) derived by Cayley-Dickson Process (CDP) from N-dimensional hypercomplex numbers (N a power of 2, at least 4) can represent singularities and, as N approaches infinite, fractals -- and thereby, scale-free networks." I notice that technical terms like "Zero-divisors" and "Cayley-Dickson Process" are in English with acronyms. According to the guidelines, I should prioritize Korean translations for terms unless they're extremely specialized. However, "Zero-divisors" is typically translated as "영인자" in Korean mathematical contexts. "Cayley-Dickson Process" might be kept in English with the acronym CDP, but sometimes it's translated as "케일리-디킨슨 과정." I'll check if there's an established Korean term. Since the user mentioned to use Korean equivalents when possible, I'll go with the translation. Next, "N-dimensional hypercomplex numbers" – "hypercomplex numbers" is "초복소수" in Korean. "N차원 초복소수" seems appropriate. The note in parentheses about N being a power of 2 and at least 4 should be kept as is, ensuring clarity. Moving on to "singularities" – "특이점" is the standard term. "Fractals" is "프랙탈," which is commonly used in Korean academic contexts. "Scale-free networks" translates to "스케일-프리 네트워크," but since this is a technical term, the hyphen might be retained as is. The next part: "Any integer greater than 8 and not a power of 2 generates a meta-fractal or 'Sky' when it is interpreted as the 'strut constant' (S) of an ensemble of octahedral vertex figures called 'Box-Kites'..." "Meta-fractal" could be "메타-프랙탈," but "Sky" here is capitalized and in quotes, so it's likely a specific term. The user instruction says to keep technical terms in English if they don't have a well-established Korean equivalent. "Strut constant" is "스트럿 상수" but maybe there's a better term. "Box-Kites" is a proper noun here, so it should remain in English with the Korean transliteration "박스-카이트" or keep it as is. The user mentioned to use parentheses for highly technical jargon, so perhaps "Box-Kites (상자-연)" but need to check if there's a standard translation. "Octahedral vertex figures" translates to "팔면체 꼭짓점 도형." The term "ensemble" here is "앙상블" in Korean, which is acceptable. "Remarkably simple bit-manipulation rules or 'recipes' provide tools for transforming one fractal genus into others within the context of Wolfram's Class 4 complexity." "Bit-manipulation" is "비트 조작," and "recipes" can be "레시피" or "규칙" (rules). Since the context is about rules, "규칙" might be better. "Fractal genus" – "프랙탈 속" (genus in biological terms, but here it's mathematical, so "프랙탈 유형" could be better. "Wolfram's Class 4 complexity" would be "울프람의 4급 복잡성" or "울프람의 클래스 4 복잡성." Throughout the translation, I need to ensure that line breaks and formatting are preserved according to the guidelines. Also, check that all technical terms are either translated appropriately or kept in English with parentheses if necessary. For example, "Box-Kites" might be kept as "Box-Kites (박스-카이트)" on first mention, then just "박스-카이트" afterward. I should also verify that terms like "scale-free networks" have established Korean equivalents. If they do, use them; otherwise, keep the English term in parentheses. Since "scale-free networks" are well-known, "스케일-프리 네트워크" is acceptable. Another point is the phrase "strut constant (S)" – since "strut" here is a specific term in the context, it might need to stay as "스트럿 상수 (S)" with the English term in parentheses if there's no standard Korean translation. Finally, ensuring that the translation flows naturally in Korean while maintaining the formal academic tone required. Checking for any sentence structures that might be awkward when translated literally and adjusting for readability without altering the original meaning.
We describe a peculiar fine structure acquired by the in-plane optical phonon at the Gamma-point in graphene when it is brought into resonance with one of the inter-Landau-level transitions in this material. The effect is most pronounced when this lattice mode (associated with the G-band in graphene Raman spectrum) is in resonance with inter-Landau-level transitions 0 -> (+,1) and (-,1) -> 0, at a magnetic field B_0 ~ 30 T. It can be used to measure the strength of the electron-phonon coupling directly, and its filling-factor dependence can be used experimentally to detect circularly polarized lattice modes.	그래핀에서 이 물질의 랜다우 준위 간 전이와 공명 상태에 놓일 때 감마 포인트에서의 면내 광학 포논이 갖게 되는 특이한 미세 구조에 대해 설명한다. 이 현상은 그래핀 라만 스펙트럼의 G-밴드와 관련된 격자 모드가 자기장 B_0 ~ 30 T 조건에서 0 → (+,1) 및 (-,1) → 0 랜다우 준위 간 전이들과 공명할 때 가장 뚜렷하게 나타난다. 이를 통해 전자-포논 결합 강도를 직접 측정할 수 있으며, 충전 인자 의존성 실험을 통해 원형 편광된 격자 모드를 탐지하는 데 활용할 수 있다.	true	Okay, let's start translating this scientific text into Korean. First, I need to understand the content thoroughly. The passage discusses a fine structure in graphene's optical phonon at the Gamma-point when it resonates with inter-Landau-level transitions. The key points are the resonance conditions, the magnetic field strength (~30 T), and the applications in measuring electron-phonon coupling and detecting circularly polarized lattice modes. First sentence: "We describe a peculiar fine structure acquired by the in-plane optical phonon at the Gamma-point in graphene when it is brought into resonance with one of the inter-Landau-level transitions in this material." I need to ensure technical terms like "in-plane optical phonon" and "Gamma-point" are correctly translated. "Gamma-point" is typically "감마 포인트" in Korean. "Inter-Landau-level transitions" would be "랜다우 준위 간 전이" but since Landau is a proper noun, it might stay as is. However, the user instructed to prioritize Korean translations. Wait, the guidelines say to keep technical terms in English unless the entire input is a single term. Hmm, but the instruction says to prioritize Korean translations for all terms whenever possible. So "inter-Landau-level transitions" becomes "랜다우 준위 간 전이" without parentheses. Next part: "The effect is most pronounced when this lattice mode (associated with the G-band in graphene Raman spectrum) is in resonance with inter-Landau-level transitions 0 -> (+,1) and (-,1) -> 0, at a magnetic field B_0 ~ 30 T." "G-band in graphene Raman spectrum" should be "그래핀 라만 스펙트럼의 G-밴드". The magnetic field B_0 is a variable, so it's written as "자기장 B_0" with the subscript preserved. The notation ~30 T is "약 30 T". Then: "It can be used to measure the strength of the electron-phonon coupling directly, and its filling-factor dependence can be used experimentally to detect circularly polarized lattice modes." "Electron-phonon coupling" is "전자-포논 결합", "filling-factor" is "충전 인자", and "circularly polarized lattice modes" is "원형 편광된 격자 모드". Need to check if all technical terms are properly translated. Also, ensure that the structure of the sentences in Korean flows naturally, maintaining the formal academic tone. Also, watch out for the formatting: equations like 0 -> (+,1) should be preserved as is, since they are mathematical expressions. The magnetic field notation B_0 should keep the subscript. Another thing to note: the user wants sentence-by-sentence translation. So each sentence in the original should correspond to a sentence in Korean. Also, avoid using parentheses for English terms unless absolutely necessary. Since most of these terms have established Korean equivalents, they should be used without parentheses. Let me verify some terms. "Optical phonon" is "광학 포논", "Landau levels" are "랜다우 준위", "electron-phonon coupling" is "전자-포논 결합", "filling factor" is "충전 인자", "circularly polarized" is "원형 편광". Now, putting it all together while maintaining the structure and guidelines. Ensure that paragraphs and line breaks are preserved as per the original. The original text has three paragraphs, so the translation should also have three. Also, check for any special characters or symbols that need to remain unchanged, like B_0 and 0 -> (+,1). Finally, review the translation for accuracy and adherence to the instructions. Make sure no terms are left in English unnecessarily and that the meaning is preserved exactly. Also, confirm that the language is formal and suitable for an academic context.
We prove pfaffian and hafnian versions of Lieb's inequalities on determinants and permanents of positive semi-definite matrices. We use the hafnian inequality to improve the lower bound of R\'ev\'esz and Sarantopoulos on the norm of a product of linear functionals on a real Euclidean space (this subject is sometimes called the `real linear polarization constant' problem).	우리는 양의 준정치 행렬의 행렬식과 퍼머넌트에 대한 라이프 부등식의 페페션 및 하프니안 버전을 증명한다. 이 하프니안 부등식을 이용하여 실 유클리드 공간 상의 선형 범함수 곱의 노름에 관한 레베시와 사란토포울로스의 하한을 개선하였으며, 이 주제는 때때로 ‘실 선형 편광 상수’ 문제라고 불린다.	true	Okay, let's start translating this academic text into Korean following the strict guidelines provided. First, I need to parse the original content sentence by sentence. The first sentence is about proving Pfaffian and Hafnian versions of Lieb's inequalities related to determinants and permanents of positive semi-definite matrices. I should check technical terms like "pfaffian," "hafnian," "Lieb's inequalities," "determinants," "permanents," and "positive semi-definite matrices." Most of these have established Korean equivalents. For example, "positive semi-definite matrices" is 일반적으로 "양의 준정 definite 행렬" but in academic contexts, it's often written as "양반정 definite 행렬." Wait, the correct term in Korean for "positive semi-definite matrices" is "양의 준정치 행렬" or sometimes "양반정치 행렬." I need to confirm the standard translation. Also, "Lieb's inequalities" would be "라이프의 부등식" since "Lieb" is a proper noun. "Pfaffian" is a mathematical term; in Korean, it's commonly written as "페페션" or "페페시안," but I think the correct transliteration is "페페션." Similarly, "Hafnian" would be "하프니안." However, I should check if there are established Korean terms. Sometimes, these terms are kept in English with Korean pronunciation. Since the user said to prioritize Korean translations when possible, but if not, use English in parentheses. However, for terms like Pfaffian and Hafnian, they might not have widely accepted Korean equivalents, so perhaps they should be kept in English with Korean pronunciation. Wait, the instruction says to prioritize Korean translations for all terms unless it's extremely specialized. So maybe I should look up the standard translations. Upon checking, "Pfaffian" is often written as "페페션" in Korean mathematical literature, and "Hafnian" as "하프니안." So those can be translated. "Determinants" is "행렬식," "permanents" is "영구식" or "퍼머넌트," but "영구식" is more literal. However, in academic contexts, "퍼머넌트" is commonly used. "Positive semi-definite matrices" should be "양의 준정치 행렬" or "양반정치 행렬." Next sentence: improving the lower bound of Révész and Sarantopoulos on the norm of a product of linear functionals on a real Euclidean space, mentioned as the real linear polarization constant problem. Names like Révész and Sarantopoulos should remain in their original form with Korean pronunciation. "Linear functionals" is "선형 범함수," "real Euclidean space" is "실 유클리드 공간." The term "real linear polarization constant problem" would be "실선형 편광 상수 문제" but maybe "실 선형 편광 상수 문제" without the space. Also, the phrase "this subject is sometimes called..." should be translated smoothly, perhaps "이 주제는 때때로 '실 선형 편광 상수' 문제라고 불립니다." I need to ensure that each sentence is translated while preserving the original meaning. Technical terms should be handled as per the guidelines. Also, check for any special characters like R\'ev\'esz, which in the translation should be "레베시" or "레베시" (Révész). Sarantopoulos would be "사란토포울로스." Now, putting it all together, making sure the sentences flow logically in Korean, maintaining the formal academic tone. Also, check line breaks and formatting. The original text has a line break after the first sentence, but according to the guidelines, consolidate arbitrary line breaks that are from web formatting. Since this seems like a continuous paragraph, I should merge them into a single paragraph unless there's a genuine topic shift. Wait, the original text has a line break after the first sentence. The user's instruction says to consolidate arbitrary line breaks that are formatting artifacts. So in this case, since the line break is likely due to screen-width formatting, I should merge the sentences into a single paragraph. However, if the line break was intentional (like a paragraph break), I should keep it. But given the context, it's probably a formatting break. So in the translation, I'll present it as a single paragraph but ensure logical flow. Also, check for the use of quotes around 'real linear polarization constant' – in Korean, use double quotes “ ” or 「」, but since the original uses single quotes, maybe keep them as is or use Korean quotation marks. The instruction says to preserve special characters, so the quotes should remain, but in Korean context, sometimes they use 「」. However, since the original uses single quotes, perhaps keep them as ‘ ’. Finally, ensure that all technical terms are correctly translated, and that the translation is formal and accurate without colloquial expressions. Also, verify that the names are properly transliterated and that mathematical terms are in line with standard Korean mathematical terminology.
In $\XQM$, a quark can emit Goldstone bosons. The flavor symmetry breaking in the Goldstone boson emission process is used to intepret the nucleon flavor-spin structure. In this paper, we study the inner structure of constituent quarks implied in $\XQM$ caused by the Goldstone boson emission process in nucleon. From a simplified model Hamiltonian derived from $\XQM$, the intrinsic wave functions of constituent quarks are determined. Then the obtained transition probabilities of the emission of Goldstone boson from a quark can give a reasonable interpretation to the flavor symmetry breaking in nucleon flavor-spin structure.	$\XQM$에서 쿼크는 골드스톤 보존을 방출할 수 있다. 골드스톤 보존 방출 과정에서 발생하는 플래버 대칭 깨짐은 핵자의 플래버-스핀 구조를 해석하는 데 사용된다. 본 논문에서는 핵자 내 골드스톤 보존 방출 과정에 의해 유도된 $\XQM$에서의 구성 쿼크 내부 구조를 연구한다. $\XQM$으로부터 유도된 단순화된 모델 해밀토니안을 통해 구성 쿼크의 고유 파동 함수를 결정하였다. 이후 쿼크로부터 골드스톤 보존 방출에 대한 전이 확률을 계산하여 핵자 플래버-스핀 구조에서의 플래버 대칭 깨짐 현상을 합리적으로 설명할 수 있다.	true	Okay, let's start translating this academic text into Korean while following the strict guidelines provided. First, I need to ensure that each sentence is translated individually but maintains the overall flow. The technical terms like "quark," "Goldstone bosons," and "flavor symmetry breaking" should be handled carefully. Looking at the first sentence: "In $\XQM$, a quark can emit Goldstone bosons." The acronym $\XQM$ should stay as is since it's a specific term. "Quark" is 쿼크 in Korean, and "Goldstone bosons" is 골드스톤 보존. I need to check if there's an established Korean term for these. Since they're proper nouns in physics, keeping them in English with Korean pronunciation might be better. Next, "The flavor symmetry breaking in the Goldstone boson emission process is used to intepret the nucleon flavor-spin structure." Here, "flavor symmetry breaking" is 플래버 대칭 깨짐. "Nucleon flavor-spin structure" would be 핵자 플래버-스핀 구조. I need to make sure that "intepret" is corrected to "interpret" first, then translated as 해석하다. The third sentence: "In this paper, we study the inner structure of constituent quarks implied in $\XQM$ caused by the Goldstone boson emission process in nucleon." "Constituent quarks" is 구성 쿼크. The structure here is complex, so I need to ensure the sentence flows in Korean without losing the original meaning. "From a simplified model Hamiltonian derived from $\XQM$, the intrinsic wave functions of constituent quarks are determined." "Hamiltonian" stays as 해밀토니안. "Intrinsic wave functions" is 고유 파동 함수. Then, "Then the obtained transition probabilities of the emission of Goldstone boson from a quark can give a reasonable interpretation to the flavor symmetry breaking in nucleon flavor-spin structure." "Transition probabilities" is 전이 확률. Ensuring that the connection between the emission process and the symmetry breaking is clear. I also need to preserve all formatting like the dollar signs around $\XQM$, line breaks, and paragraph structure. Since the original text has line breaks after each sentence, but according to the guidelines, I should consolidate arbitrary line breaks into meaningful semantic units. However, since each sentence here seems to be a separate point, maintaining the line breaks might be acceptable if they represent logical divisions. Checking technical terms again: "flavor-spin structure" is 플래버-스핀 구조. "Wave functions" is 파동 함수. "Hamiltonian" is 해밀토니안. "Transition probabilities" is 전이 확률. I should avoid using English terms unless absolutely necessary. For example, "Goldstone bosons" might be 골드스톤 보존, which is a direct translation. "Nucleon" is 핵자. "Constituent quarks" is 구성 쿼크. Now, putting it all together in Korean, ensuring formal academic tone and proper sentence structure. Also, verifying that all technical terms are correctly translated and that the original meaning is preserved without any interpretation. Making sure that the sentences are connected logically and that the flow is natural in Korean academic writing.
We investigate the effect of tuning the phonon energy on the correlation effects in models of electron-phonon interactions using DMFT. In the regime where itinerant electrons, instantaneous electron-phonon driven correlations and static distortions compete on similar energy scales, we find several interesting results including (1) A crossover from band to Mott behavior in the spectral function, leading to hybrid band/Mott features in the spectral function for phonon frequencies slightly larger than the band width. (2) Since the optical conductivity depends sensitively on the form of the spectral function, we show that such a regime should be observable through the low frequency form of the optical conductivity. (3) The resistivity has a double kondo peak arrangement	우리는 DMFT를 이용한 전자-포논 상호작용 모델에서 포논 에너지를 조정하는 것이 상관계효과에 미치는 영향을 연구한다. 이동성 전자, 즉시적인 전자-포논 유도 상관계, 그리고 정적 왜곡이 유사한 에너지 척도에서 경쟁하는 영역에서 우리는 다음과 같은 여러 흥미로운 결과를 발견하였다. (1) 스펙트럼 함수에서 밴드 특성에서 모트 특성으로의 교차 현상이 나타나며, 이는 밴드 폭보다 약간 큰 포논 주파수에서 스펙트럼 함수에 혼합된 밴드/모트 특성을 유도한다. (2) 광학 전도도가 스펙트럼 함수의 형태에 민감하게 의존하므로, 이러한 영역은 저주파 영역의 광학 전도도 측정을 통해 관측 가능함을 보여준다. (3) 저항률에 이중 콘도 피크 배열이 나타난다.	true	Okay, let me start by reading through the user's query carefully. They provided a detailed translation task with strict guidelines. My job is to translate a scientific text about electron-phonon interactions using DMFT into Korean while following all the specified rules. First, I'll parse the original English text. The content discusses the effects of tuning phonon energy on correlation effects in electron-phonon interaction models using DMFT. There are three main findings listed. The user emphasized preserving technical terms, proper formatting, and sentence-by-sentence translation without interpretation. I need to ensure that technical terms like "DMFT" (Dynamical Mean-Field Theory) are kept in English since they're standard in the field. Terms like "spectral function," "optical conductivity," and "resistivity" should have established Korean equivalents. I'll check if these terms are commonly translated. For instance, "spectral function" might be "스펙트럼 함수" or "분광 함수." I should use the most accepted translation in Korean scientific literature. Next, the structure: the original has three numbered points. I must maintain the numbering and the bullet points. The user mentioned preserving paragraphs and line breaks, so I'll keep each sentence separate but ensure the flow is natural in Korean. Looking at the third point about "double Kondo peak arrangement," "Kondo" is a proper noun (from the Kondo effect), so it stays in English. The term "arrangement" here might be best translated as "배열" or "구성." I'll go with "이중 콘도 피크 배열" to maintain accuracy. I also need to watch out for sentence structure. Korean sentences often end with appropriate endings. Since the user wants formal academic writing, I'll use ~합니다/입니다 style. For example, "We investigate..." becomes "연구합니다..." in a formal tone. Formatting preservation is crucial. The original has line breaks after each sentence and numbered points. I'll replicate that structure, ensuring that paragraphs are broken where there's a conceptual shift. However, the user mentioned consolidating arbitrary line breaks, so if some breaks are just due to web formatting, I should merge them. But in this case, the line breaks seem intentional for listing the results, so I'll keep them. I should avoid colloquial expressions. Words like "leading to" can be translated as "이 이어져" or "로 이어지며" to maintain formality. Also, phrases like "we show that such a regime should be observable" need to be translated in a way that preserves the certainty and academic tone, perhaps using "관측 가능해야 한다" which is formal and precise. Checking for technical terms again: "Mott behavior" refers to Mott insulator, so "모트 행동" might be acceptable, but "모트 특성" could be more natural. I'll confirm standard translations here. Similarly, "optical conductivity" is "광학 전도도" in Korean. For the resistivity point, "double Kondo peak arrangement" should be "이중 콘도 피크 배열" to keep the technical term intact. Ensuring that terms like "resistivity" are correctly translated as "저항률" or "저항성" depending on context. In this case, "저항률" seems appropriate. Finally, I'll review the entire translation to ensure that all formatting markers, line breaks, and numbering are preserved. Each numbered point should start on a new line, and the structure should mirror the original. Also, verify that all technical terms are either translated correctly or left in English as per the guidelines, without unnecessary parentheticals. I think that covers the main points. Now, time to put it all together accurately and formally in Korean while adhering to the user's strict instructions.
We show that crystal can trap a broad (x, x', y, y', E) distribution of particles and channel it preserved with a high precision. This sampled-and-hold distribution can be steered by a bent crystal for analysis downstream. In simulations for the 7 TeV Large Hadron Collider, a crystal adapted to the accelerator lattice traps 90% of diffractively scattered protons emerging from the interaction point with a divergence 100 times the critical angle. We set the criterion for crystal adaptation improving efficiency ~100-fold. Proton angles are preserved in crystal transmission with accuracy down to 0.1 microrad. This makes feasible a crystal application for measuring very forward protons at the LHC.	결정체가 넓은 범위의 (x, x', y, y', E) 분포를 갖는 입자들을 포획하여 고정밀로 유지하면서 채널링할 수 있음을 보여준다. 이 샘플링 앤 홀드(sampling-and-hold) 분포는 휘어진 결정체를 통해 분석 장치 하류로 유도될 수 있다. 7 TeV 대형 강입자 충돌기(LHC)에 대한 시뮬레이션에서, 가속기 격자에 적응된 결정체는 상호작용 지점에서 발생하는 회절 산란된 양성자의 90%를 포획하며, 이들의 발산각은 임계각의 100배에 달한다. 결정체 적응 기준을 설정하여 효율을 약 100배 향상시켰다. 결정체 투과 과정에서 양성자의 각도는 0.1 마이크로라디안 정밀도로 보존된다. 이는 LHC에서 매우 전방향(forward) 양성자 측정을 위한 결정체 응용 가능성을 실현한다.	true	Okay, let me start by reading through the user's query carefully. They want a translation of a technical physics text into Korean, following specific guidelines. The text mentions crystal trapping particles, simulations for the LHC, and precise measurements. First, I need to ensure that each sentence is translated individually while keeping the flow. Technical terms like "Large Hadron Collider" should be translated to "대형 강입자 충돌기" since that's the established term. Terms like "critical angle" might stay as "임계각" in Korean, which is a direct translation. I should check if terms like "diffractively scattered protons" have a standard Korean equivalent. "회절 산란된 양성자" seems appropriate. The user emphasized preserving meaning, so I must be careful not to alter the intended technical nuances. The user also mentioned handling line breaks and formatting. The original text has some line breaks that might be from web formatting, so I need to consolidate those into coherent paragraphs in Korean. For example, the sentence starting with "We set the criterion..." should follow naturally after the simulation results. Numbers and units like "7 TeV" and "0.1 microrad" should remain as is but formatted correctly in Korean. "TeV" is commonly used in Korean scientific contexts, so no translation needed there. I need to ensure that the translation uses formal, professional language. Avoiding colloquial expressions is key here. Terms like "sampled-and-hold distribution" might be tricky. Translating it as "샘플링 앤 홀드 분포" keeps the original term in English parentheses since it's a technical phrase that might not have a direct Korean equivalent. Also, checking the instruction about preserving all formatting markers and tokens. Since the original text doesn't have any special markers, I just need to maintain the structure. Lastly, ensuring that the output is only the translated text without any additional explanations. Reviewing each sentence to confirm technical accuracy and adherence to the guidelines. Making sure that the final translation reads smoothly in Korean while strictly following the user's critical instructions.
We analyze the possibility of probing non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI, for short) through the detection of neutrinos produced in a future galactic supernova (SN).We consider the effect of NSI on the neutrino propagation through the SN envelope within a three-neutrino framework, paying special attention to the inclusion of NSI-induced resonant conversions, which may take place in the most deleptonised inner layers. We study the possibility of detecting NSI effects in a Megaton water Cherenkov detector, either through modulation effects in the $\bar\nu_e$ spectrum due to (i) the passage of shock waves through the SN envelope, (ii) the time dependence of the electron fraction and (iii) the Earth matter effects; or, finally, through the possible detectability of the neutronization $\nu_e$ burst. We find that the $\bar\nu_e$ spectrum can exhibit dramatic features due to the internal NSI-induced resonant conversion. This occurs for non-universal NSI strengths of a few %, and for very small flavor-changing NSI above a few$\times 10^{-5}$.	미래의 은하 초신성(SN)에서 생성된 중성미자를 탐지함으로써 비표준 중성미자 상호작용(NSI)의 탐지 가능성을 분석합니다. 3중성미자 체계 내에서 초신성 외피를 통한 중성미자 전파에 미치는 NSI 효과를 고려하며, 특히 가장 탈렙톤화된 내부 층에서 발생할 수 있는 NSI 유도 공명 전환을 면밀히 검토합니다. 메가톤급 물 체렌코프 탐지기에서 NSI 효과 탐지 가능성을 연구할 때, (i) 충격파가 초신성 외피를 통과할 때의 조도 변화, (ii) 전자 분율의 시간 의존성, (iii) 지구 물질 효과에 의해 $\bar\nu_e$ 스펙트럼에서 발생하는 변조 효과나, 마지막으로 중성자화 $\nu_e$ 붐의 탐지 가능성을 통해 이를 분석합니다. 비일관적 NSI 강도가 수 % 수준이거나, 맛변화 NSI가 $10^{-5}$ 수준 이상일 경우, $\bar\nu_e$ 스펙트럼이 NSI 유도 내부 공명 전환에 의해 극적인 특성을 나타낼 수 있음을 밝혔습니다.	true	Okay, I need to translate this scientific text about non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI) into Korean while following the strict guidelines provided. Let me start by reading through the entire text to understand the context and key terms. First, the user mentioned using formal academic language, preserving technical terms, and handling them appropriately. The text is about neutrinos from a supernova and their detection. Terms like "non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI)" should be translated to Korean, but since NSI is an acronym, I should check if there's a standard Korean equivalent. If not, I might keep it as NSI in parentheses after the full Korean translation. However, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean translations unless it's extremely specialized. Let me think: "비표준 중성미자 상호작용" seems like the correct translation, so I can use that and maybe put NSI in parentheses if needed, but only if it's necessary for understanding. Next, "Megaton water Cherenkov detector" – "메가톤급 물 체렌코프 탐지기" sounds right. Proper nouns like "Cherenkov" should stay as is. The symbols like $\bar\nu_e$ are mathematical expressions, so they should remain unchanged. The user specified to leave code, math expressions, etc., as they are. Looking at the structure: the original text has paragraphs, some bold terms (though in the input it's just plain text), and mentions like (i), (ii), (iii). I need to maintain the numbering and structure. The sentence about "non-universal NSI strengths of a few %" – "비일관적 NSI 강도" for "non-universal NSI strengths" and "몇 % 수준" for "a few %". The user emphasized consolidating arbitrary line breaks. The original text seems to have line breaks after each sentence, which might be from web formatting. I should merge these into coherent paragraphs. For example, the first sentence ends with a period, so the next sentence starts on a new line, but in Korean, I should make sure the flow is natural by joining related sentences into paragraphs where appropriate. Also, terms like "resonant conversions" should be translated as "공명 전환". The part about "Earth matter effects" can be "지구 물질 효과". The phrase "neutronization $\nu_e$ burst" would be "중성자화 ν_e 붐" but since ν_e is a symbol, it stays. I need to check for any technical terms that might not have a direct Korean equivalent. For example, "deleptonised inner layers" – "탈렙톤화된 내부 층들". "Deleptonised" is a specialized term, but in particle physics, this should have a standard translation. The user mentioned preserving the original meaning without interpretation. So I must ensure that the translation is accurate without adding or omitting any information. Also, maintaining the formal academic tone is crucial here. Looking at the sentence structure: "We analyze the possibility... through the detection..." becomes "미래의 은하 초신성에서 생성된 중성미자의 탐지를 통해... 가능성 분석합니다." The passive voice in Korean might not be as common, so using active voice where appropriate but keeping the formal structure. The part about "three-neutrino framework" should be "3중성미자 체계" or "세 중성미자의 체계". "Framework" here is better as "체계" or "구조". The mention of "flavor-changing NSI" would be "맛변화 NSI" or "플레이버 변화 NSI". Since "flavor" in particle physics is often translated as "맛", so "맛변화" is correct. I should also check the numbers and units: "a few$\times 10^{-5}$" becomes "몇 × 10⁻⁵ 수준". The multiplication symbol and exponent need to be correctly formatted in Korean. Finally, ensuring that all the mathematical symbols like $\bar\nu_e$ are preserved exactly as they are. Also, the line breaks after each point (i), (ii), (iii) should be maintained to keep the structure clear. Putting it all together, I'll translate each sentence carefully, check technical terms, maintain the formal tone, and ensure the structure is preserved while optimizing readability in Korean. Let me review each part again to make sure no guidelines are violated, especially regarding technical terms and formatting.
We performed a rigorous theoretical convergence analysis of the discrete dipole approximation (DDA). We prove that errors in any measured quantity are bounded by a sum of a linear and quadratic term in the size of a dipole d, when the latter is in the range of DDA applicability. Moreover, the linear term is significantly smaller for cubically than for non-cubically shaped scatterers. Therefore, for small d errors for cubically shaped particles are much smaller than for non-cubically shaped. The relative importance of the linear term decreases with increasing size, hence convergence of DDA for large enough scatterers is quadratic in the common range of d. Extensive numerical simulations were carried out for a wide range of d. Finally we discuss a number of new developments in DDA and their consequences for convergence.	우리는 이산 쌍극자 근사(Discrete Dipole Approximation, DDA)에 대해 엄격한 이론적 수렴 분석을 수행하였다. 쌍극자 크기 d가 DDA 적용 범위 내에 있을 때, 임의의 측정량의 오차가 d의 선형 항과 이차 항의 합으로 유계(bounded)임을 증명하였다. 또한, 산란체가 입방체 형태일 경우 비입방체 형태에 비해 선형 항이 현저히 작다. 따라서, 작은 d에 대해 입방체 형태 입자의 오차는 비입방체 형태에 비해 훨씬 작다. 산란체 크기가 증가함에 따라 선형 항의 상대적 중요도는 감소하므로 충분히 큰 산란체에 대해 DDA의 수렴은 일반적인 d 범위에서 이차적이다. 광범위한 수치 시뮬레이션이 다양한 d 범위에서 수행되었다. 마지막으로 DDA의 여러 새로운 발전과 이들의 수렴 특성에 미치는 영향을 논의한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. The user wants a precise translation into Korean with strict adherence to the guidelines. First, I need to make sure each sentence is translated individually while maintaining the flow. The text is about the Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA), so technical terms are crucial. Starting with "rigorous theoretical convergence analysis" – "rigorous" should be "엄격한" and "convergence analysis" is "수렴 분석". The term "discrete dipole approximation" should stay in English with parentheses since it's a specific technical term. Next sentence: "errors in any measured quantity are bounded by a sum..." Here, "bounded by a sum" translates to "합으로 제한된다". Need to ensure that terms like "linear term" and "quadratic term" are correctly translated as "선형 항" and "이차 항". The part about "cubically than for non-cubically shaped scatterers" – "cubically" here refers to cubic shape, so "입방체 형태의 산란체" vs. "비입방체 형태". The comparison should be clear. In the sentence about the relative importance decreasing with size, "relative importance" can be "상대적 중요도", and "convergence" is "수렴". The phrase "quadratic in the common range of d" needs careful handling to maintain the mathematical meaning. The numerical simulations part: "extensive numerical simulations" becomes "광범위한 수치 시뮬레이션". Finally, "new developments in DDA and their consequences for convergence" – "새로운 발전" and "결과". I should check each technical term to see if there's an established Korean equivalent. For example, "scatterers" is "산란체" in this context. Also, ensuring that the structure of the sentences follows Korean grammar rules, which might mean reordering some phrases for clarity. Need to maintain the formal academic tone throughout. Avoid any colloquial expressions. Make sure that each paragraph's structure is preserved, with line breaks where appropriate. Also, ensure that the English terms in parentheses are only used when necessary, as per the guidelines. Let me go through each sentence again to confirm accuracy. For instance, "when the latter is in the range of DDA applicability" translates to "후자가 DDA 적용 범위 내에 있을 때". That seems correct. Double-checking terms like "quadratic in the common range of d" – "일반적인 d 범위에서 수렴은 이차적이다" captures the meaning. Finally, ensure that all the formatting is preserved as per the user's instructions, with paragraphs and line breaks maintained. Since the original text is a single paragraph, the translation should also be a single paragraph without unnecessary line breaks. Okay, I think that's all. Let's put it all together now.
This is a supplement to the paper arXiv:q-bio/0701050, containing the text of correspondence sent to Nature in 1990.	이 문서는 arXiv:q-bio/0701050 논문의 보충 자료이며, 1990년에 네이처(Nature)에 보낸 서신 내용을 담고 있습니다.	true	Okay, let's start translating this sentence. The user provided a supplement to a paper with the arXiv number q-bio/0701050. The first thing I need to do is make sure the arXiv identifier is preserved correctly. Since it's a technical term and a specific identifier, I should keep it in English. Next, the phrase "containing the text of correspondence sent to Nature in 1990." The word "correspondence" here refers to a formal letter or communication, so in Korean, it would be "서신" or "의견서". "Nature" is the journal name, so it's better to keep it as "네이처(Nature)" to ensure clarity. The year 1990 should stay as is. I need to check the formatting. The original text has a line break after "arXiv:q-bio/0701050," so I should maintain that structure. Also, the sentence is a fragment, so the translation should reflect that. Let me put it all together: "이 문서는 arXiv:q-bio/0701050 논문의 보충 자료이며, 1990년에 네이처(Nature)에 보낸 서신 내용을 담고 있습니다." Wait, does "correspondence" need parentheses in English? The guidelines say to use parentheses only for extremely specialized terms. Since "correspondence" in this context is a general term for communication, the Korean translation "서신" is sufficient. So no need for parentheses here. Also, "Nature" as a journal name is commonly known in Korean academic circles as "네이처", so adding (Nature) might be redundant. But sometimes it's kept for clarity. Hmm, the instruction says to prioritize Korean translations and use English in parentheses only when necessary. Since "Nature" is a proper noun, maybe it's better to keep it as "네이처(Nature)" to avoid confusion. Double-checking the technical terms: "arXiv" is a preprint repository, so it's kept in English. The rest seems okay. The sentence structure in Korean flows naturally. I think this meets all the guidelines: preserving the original meaning, handling technical terms correctly, maintaining the format, and using formal language.
We propose an extrapolation technique that allows accuracy improvement of the discrete dipole approximation computations. The performance of this technique was studied empirically based on extensive simulations for 5 test cases using many different discretizations. The quality of the extrapolation improves with refining discretization reaching extraordinary performance especially for cubically shaped particles. A two order of magnitude decrease of error was demonstrated. We also propose estimates of the extrapolation error, which were proven to be reliable. Finally we propose a simple method to directly separate shape and discretization errors and illustrated this for one test case.	우리는 이산 쌍극자 근사법 계산의 정확도 향상을 위한 외삽 기법을 제안한다. 이 기법의 성능은 다양한 이산화 조건을 적용한 5개의 테스트 케이스에 대한 광범위한 시뮬레이션을 기반으로 실험적으로 분석되었다. 외삽의 질은 이산화를 세분화함에 따라 향상되며, 특히 입방체 형태의 입자에 대해 뛰어난 성능을 보인다. 오차가 두 자릿수 감소하는 것이 입증되었다. 또한 외삽 오차의 추정치를 제안하였으며, 이 추정치는 신뢰성이 입증되었다. 마지막으로 형상 오차와 이산화 오차를 직접 분리하는 간단한 방법을 제안하고 이를 하나의 테스트 케이스를 통해 시연하였다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. The user wants the academic text translated into Korean following strict guidelines. First, I need to parse the original English content carefully. The main points are about an extrapolation technique improving discrete dipole approximation computations, tested on five cases with various discretizations, especially effective for cubic particles, error reduction, error estimates, and separating shape and discretization errors. Starting with the first sentence: "We propose an extrapolation technique that allows accuracy improvement of the discrete dipole approximation computations." The key terms here are "extrapolation technique," "discrete dipole approximation (DDA) computations." For technical terms, the guideline says to prioritize Korean translations unless it's too specialized. "Discrete dipole approximation" is a specific method in computational electromagnetics, so I should check if there's a standard Korean term. Maybe "이산 쌍극자 근사법" is acceptable. "Extrapolation technique" could be "외삽 기법." Next, "The performance of this technique was studied empirically based on extensive simulations for 5 test cases using many different discretizations." Here, "empirically studied" becomes "실험적으로 분석되었다," "simulations" as "시뮬레이션," "test cases" as "테스트 케이스," and "discretizations" as "이산화." "Quality of the extrapolation improves with refining discretization reaching extraordinary performance especially for cubically shaped particles." "Refining discretization" translates to "이산화를 세분화함에 따라," "cubically shaped particles" as "입방체 형태의 입자들." "A two order of magnitude decrease of error was demonstrated." Here, "two order of magnitude" is "두 자릿수 감소," but maybe "두 단계 감소" is more natural in Korean. "We also propose estimates of the extrapolation error, which were proven to be reliable." "Estimates" becomes "추정치," "proven reliable" as "신뢰할 수 있음이 입증됨." "Finally we propose a simple method to directly separate shape and discretization errors and illustrated this for one test case." "Separate shape and discretization errors" would be "형상 오차와 이산화 오차를 직접 분리하는 방법," "illustrated" as "시연함." Need to ensure that technical terms are translated correctly without unnecessary English parentheticals. Check each term against common Korean equivalents. For example, "discrete dipole approximation" might be known in Korean literature as 이산 쌍극자 근사법, so no need to keep it in English. Also, maintain formal academic tone. Avoid colloquial expressions. Ensure sentences flow logically, merging any arbitrary line breaks from the original. For instance, the first paragraph has line breaks after each sentence, which should be kept as separate lines unless they are artifacts. But according to the guidelines, consolidate arbitrary line breaks from web formatting. The original text seems to have each sentence on a new line, which might be intentional for readability in the source. Since it's academic, each sentence as a line might be acceptable. Check for proper nouns and ensure they stay in English if needed. Here, "discrete dipole approximation" is a proper method name, but since it's translated, use the Korean version. Lastly, verify that all formatting markers and tokens are preserved. The user mentioned retaining start/end tokens and formatting markers, but the input doesn't have any. Just need to ensure line breaks and structure are as per guidelines. Putting it all together, the translation should maintain technical accuracy, formal tone, and proper structure without adding explanations or notes.
The multisite phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle is a motif repeatedly used in cell signaling. This motif itself can generate a variety of dynamic behaviors like bistability and ultrasensitivity without direct positive feedbacks. In this paper, we study the number of positive steady states of a general multisite phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle, and how the number of positive steady states varies by changing the biological parameters. We show analytically that (1) for some parameter ranges, there are at least n+1 (if n is even) or n (if n is odd) steady states; (2) there never are more than 2n-1 steady states (in particular, this implies that for n=2, including single levels of MAPK cascades, there are at most three steady states); (3) for parameters near the standard Michaelis-Menten quasi-steady state conditions, there are at most n+1 steady states; and (4) for parameters far from the standard Michaelis-Menten quasi-steady state conditions, there is at most one steady state.	다중 부위 인산화-탈인산화 사이클은 세포 신호전달에서 반복적으로 사용되는 회로 구조이다. 이 회로 구조 자체는 직접적인 양의 피드백 없이도 이안정성(bistability) 및 초감응성(ultrasensitivity)과 같은 다양한 동적 행동을 생성할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 일반적인 다중 부위 인산화-탈인산화 사이클의 양의 정상 상태(positive steady state) 수를 연구하고, 생물학적 매개변수를 변화함에 따라 이 수가 어떻게 변화하는지를 분석한다. 우리는 분석적으로 다음과 같은 결과를 보인다. (1) 특정 매개변수 범위에서는 n이 짝수일 때 최소한 n+1개, 홀수일 때는 n개의 정상 상태가 존재한다; (2) 정상 상태 수가 2n-1개를 초과하지 않는다(특히 n=2인 경우, MAPK 계단의 단일 수준을 포함하여 최대 3개의 정상 상태만 존재함을 의미함); (3) 표준 Michaelis-Menten 준정상 상태 조건 근처의 매개변수에서는 최대 n+1개의 정상 상태만 존재한다; (4) 표준 Michaelis-Menten 준정상 상태 조건에서 멀리 떨어진 매개변수에서는 최대 1개의 정상 상태만 존재한다.	true	Okay, let me tackle this translation request. The user wants the given text translated into Korean following strict guidelines. First, I'll read through the original text carefully to understand the context and key terms. The content is about multisite phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycles in cell signaling, discussing dynamic behaviors like bistability and ultrasensitivity, and the number of steady states under different parameters. I need to ensure that technical terms are handled correctly. Terms like "multisite phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle" should be translated into Korean if there's a standard equivalent. I'll check if "다중 부위 인산화-탈인산화 사이클" is the correct term. Similarly, "Michaelis-Menten quasi-steady state conditions" is a proper noun, so it should stay in English but with a Korean explanation in parentheses if necessary. Wait, the guidelines say to prioritize Korean translations unless it's extremely specialized. Let me verify if there's an established Korean term for Michaelis-Menten. Probably, it's kept in English with a translation note. Next, the structure: the original text has line breaks that might be due to formatting. According to the guidelines, I should consolidate these into meaningful paragraphs. The sentences are complex, so breaking them into logical units will help readability in Korean. For example, the first paragraph has several sentences that should each be translated as separate sentences but without preserving the arbitrary line breaks. Looking at the mathematical expressions like "n+1 (if n is even)" – these should remain as-is, but ensure that the surrounding text is properly translated. Also, terms like "positive steady states" need to be accurately translated to "양의 정상 상태" or similar. I'll start translating sentence by sentence. The first sentence introduces the motif in cell signaling. Then, explaining the dynamic behaviors without positive feedbacks. The paper's study on the number of steady states and parameter variations. The four points listed need careful translation, ensuring that the numerical ranges and conditions are preserved. For the technical terms like "Michaelis-Menten quasi-steady state conditions," I'll check if there's a standard Korean translation. If not, use the English term with a parenthetical translation. However, since Michaelis-Menten is a well-known term, it's likely kept in English. I need to maintain the formal academic tone throughout. Avoid colloquial expressions. Ensure that each translated sentence flows logically, even if it means slightly restructuring for natural Korean syntax. Also, check for consistency in terminology throughout the translation. After translating, I'll review to make sure all guidelines are followed: no omitted content, proper handling of technical terms, correct formatting (no markdown, just line breaks as per guidelines), and that the translated text is a faithful representation of the original's meaning without adding or removing any information.
In this manuscript we investigate the capabilities of the Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) to simulate scattering from particles that are much larger than the wavelength of the incident light, and describe an optimized publicly available DDA computer program that processes the large number of dipoles required for such simulations. Numerical simulations of light scattering by spheres with size parameters x up to 160 and 40 for refractive index m=1.05 and 2 respectively are presented and compared with exact results of the Mie theory. Errors of both integral and angle-resolved scattering quantities generally increase with m and show no systematic dependence on x. Computational times increase steeply with both x and m, reaching values of more than 2 weeks on a cluster of 64 processors. The main distinctive feature of the computer program is the ability to parallelize a single DDA simulation over a cluster of computers, which allows it to simulate light scattering by very large particles, like the ones that are considered in this manuscript. Current limitations and possible ways for improvement are discussed.	이 논문에서는 입사광의 파장보다 훨씬 더 큰 입자로부터의 산란을 시뮬레이션하기 위한 이산 쌍극자 근사법(Discrete Dipole Approximation, DDA)의 능력을 조사하고, 그러한 시뮬레이션에 필요한 대규모 쌍극자 수를 처리할 수 있는 최적화된 공개 DDA 컴퓨터 프로그램을 설명합니다. 크기 매개변수 x가 160(굴절률 m=1.05) 및 40(m=2)까지인 구형 입자에 의한 광산란의 수치 시뮬레이션 결과를 제시하고, 이를 정확한 Mie 이론 결과와 비교합니다. 적분 산란량 및 각도 분해 산란량의 오차는 일반적으로 m이 증가함에 따라 증가하며 x에 대한 명확한 의존성은 보이지 않습니다. 계산 시간은 x와 m이 증가함에 따라 급격히 증가하여 64개 프로세서로 구성된 클러스터에서 2주 이상 소요됩니다. 이 컴퓨터 프로그램의 주요 특징은 컴퓨터 클러스터를 통해 단일 DDA 시뮬레이션을 병렬화할 수 있는 능력으로, 이를 통해 본 논문에서 다룬 것과 같이 매우 큰 입자에 의한 광산란을 시뮬레이션할 수 있습니다. 현재의 한계와 가능한 개선 방안에 대해 논의합니다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation request. The user wants a Korean translation of a scientific manuscript abstract, following strict guidelines. First, I need to understand the content thoroughly. The manuscript discusses the Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) for simulating light scattering by large particles, comparing results with Mie theory, and details of a new program. The critical instructions mention preserving technical terms. "Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA)" should stay in English with parentheses since it's a specific term. Terms like "Mie theory" also remain in English. I need to check if there are established Korean equivalents for terms like "size parameters" (크기 매개변수) or "refractive index" (굴절률). Next, formatting preservation: the original is a single paragraph, so I should keep it as one unless there's a natural break. The user emphasized consolidating arbitrary line breaks, so I'll merge the lines into coherent sentences without the original line breaks. Sentence-by-sentence translation: Each sentence must be translated individually but maintain flow. For example, "Numerical simulations of light scattering by spheres..." becomes a Korean sentence without losing technical accuracy. Technical terms like "angle-resolved scattering quantities" might be "각도 분해 산란량" but I should verify if that's the standard term. Also, "cluster of 64 processors" translates to "64개 프로세서 클러스터", keeping "cluster" in English as it's a technical term in computing. The user wants formal, professional language. Avoid colloquial expressions. Ensure that terms like "computational times" are accurately rendered as "계산 시간" and that phrases like "parallelize a single DDA simulation" are correctly translated to "단일 DDA 시뮬레이션을 병렬화할 수 있는 능력". I need to check for any possible errors in technical translations. For instance, "size parameters x up to 160" becomes "크기 매개변수 x가 160까지" which is correct. Also, "refractive index m=1.05" should be "굴절률 m=1.05" as 'm' is commonly used in physics for refractive index. Ensure that numbers and units are preserved correctly. The computational time example: "more than 2 weeks" is "2주 이상". The last sentence about limitations and improvements should maintain the formal structure. "Current limitations and possible ways for improvement are discussed" becomes "현재의 한계와 개선 방안에 대해 논의합니다." I should review the entire translation to ensure that all technical terms are correctly handled, sentences flow logically, and formatting adheres to the guidelines. Check that no part is omitted or paraphrased. Also, confirm that all original elements like "DDA" and "Mie theory" are kept in English with parentheses where necessary, but only when there's no established Korean term. Finally, make sure the translation is concise and maintains the academic tone appropriate for the original manuscript. Avoid any markdown and ensure that the output is purely the translated text as per instructions.
We present a review of the discrete dipole approximation (DDA), which is a general method to simulate light scattering by arbitrarily shaped particles. We put the method in historical context and discuss recent developments, taking the viewpoint of a general framework based on the integral equations for the electric field. We review both the theory of the DDA and its numerical aspects, the latter being of critical importance for any practical application of the method. Finally, the position of the DDA among other methods of light scattering simulation is shown and possible future developments are discussed.	본 논문에서는 임의의 형태를 갖는 입자에 의한 광산란을 시뮬레이션하기 위한 일반적 방법인 이산 쌍극자 근사(DDA)에 대한 검토를 제시한다. 이 방법을 역사적 맥락에 위치시키고 전기장에 대한 적분 방정식을 기반으로 한 일반적 체계의 관점에서 최근 발전 내용을 논의한다. DDA 이론과 수치적 측면 모두를 검토하며, 후자는 이 방법의 실제 응용에서 핵심적인 중요성을 갖는다. 마지막으로 DDA가 다른 광산란 시뮬레이션 방법들 중에서 차지하는 위치를 제시하고 향후 가능한 발전 방향을 논의한다.	true	Okay, let's tackle this translation. The user wants a Korean translation of the provided English text about the discrete dipole approximation (DDA). First, I need to make sure I understand the content thoroughly. The text is an academic overview of DDA, its historical context, recent developments, theory, numerical aspects, and its standing among other methods. The critical instructions mention translating sentence by sentence while maintaining flow. I should break down each sentence but ensure the translation reads smoothly in Korean. Also, technical terms like "discrete dipole approximation (DDA)" need special attention. The guidelines say to keep technical terms in English unless there's a well-established Korean equivalent. I know that DDA is commonly referred to as DDA in Korean academic contexts, so I'll keep it as "이산 쌍극자 근사(DDA)" with the English acronym in parentheses. Next, checking for technical terms: "integral equations for the electric field" should be translated as "전기장에 대한 적분 방정식" since those terms have standard Korean equivalents. Words like "numerical aspects" can be "수치적 측면" without needing parentheses. Formatting preservation is crucial. The original text is a single paragraph, so I'll keep it as one unless there's a logical break. However, the user mentioned consolidating arbitrary line breaks, so I'll make sure the Korean translation flows without unnecessary breaks. The language register should be formal and professional. Avoiding colloquial expressions, I'll use academic language appropriate for Korean scientific literature. For example, "We present a review" becomes "본 논문에서는... 검토를 제시한다" which is formal and suitable. I need to ensure that all sentences are translated accurately without omitting or paraphrasing. The sentence about the position of DDA among other methods should clearly state "다른 광산란 시뮬레이션 방법과 비교한 DDA의 위치" to maintain the original meaning. Also, checking for any possible errors in translation. For instance, "taking the viewpoint of a general framework" translates to "일반적 체계의 관점에서 접근" which captures the intended meaning. Finally, ensuring that the output includes only the translated text without any additional explanations or notes. I'll review the translated paragraph to confirm that all guidelines are met: technical terms handled correctly, formal tone maintained, and the structure preserved as per the original text.
The quadratic pion scalar radius, \la r^2\ra^\pi_s, plays an important role for present precise determinations of \pi\pi scattering. Recently, Yndur\'ain, using an Omn\`es representation of the null isospin(I) non-strange pion scalar form factor, obtains \la r^2\ra^\pi_s=0.75\pm 0.07 fm^2. This value is larger than the one calculated by solving the corresponding Muskhelishvili-Omn\`es equations, \la r^2\ra^\pi_s=0.61\pm 0.04 fm^2. A large discrepancy between both values, given the precision, then results. We reanalyze Yndur\'ain's method and show that by imposing continuity of the resulting pion scalar form factor under tiny changes in the input \pi\pi phase shifts, a zero in the form factor for some S-wave I=0 T-matrices is then required. Once this is accounted for, the resulting value is \la r^2\ra_s^\pi=0.65\pm 0.05 fm^2. The main source of error in our determination is present experimental uncertainties in low energy S-wave I=0 \pi\pi phase shifts. Another important contribution to our error is the not yet settled asymptotic behaviour of the phase of the scalar form factor from QCD.	중성미자의 이차 스칼라 반지름 ⟨r²⟩^π_s는 ππ 산란의 정밀한 결정에서 중요한 역할을 한다. 최근 Ynduráin은 동위원소 스핀(I=0) 비이상(non-strange) 중성미자 스칼라 형태 인자에 대한 Omnès 표현을 사용하여 ⟨r²⟩^π_s=0.75±0.07 fm² 값을 얻었다. 이 값은 대응하는 Muskhelishvili-Omnès 방정식을 풀어 계산한 ⟨r²⟩^π_s=0.61±0.04 fm²보다 크다. 주어진 정밀도를 고려할 때 두 값 간에 상당한 차이가 발생한다. 본 연구에서는 Ynduráin의 방법을 재분석하여 입력된 ππ 위상 이동의 미세한 변화에 대해 결과로 얻어진 중성미자 스칼라 형태 인자의 연속성을 적용할 경우, 일부 S-파 I=0 T-행렬에 대해 형태 인자에 영점이 존재함을 보인다. 이러한 조건을 고려한 경우, ⟨r²⟩_s^π=0.65±0.05 fm²의 결과가 도출된다. 본 결정에서의 주요 오차 원천은 저에너지 S-파 I=0 ππ 위상 이동에 대한 현재 실험적 불확실성이다. 또 다른 중요한 오차 기여는 양자 색역학(QCD)으로부터 예측된 스칼라 형태 인자 위상의 점근적 행동이 아직 명확히 규명되지 않은 데 있다.	true	Okay, I need to translate this technical physics text into Korean. Let me start by reading through the entire passage to understand the context. The topic is about the quadratic pion scalar radius and its determination through different methods. There are several technical terms here, like "Omnès representation," "Muskhelishvili-Omnès equations," and "S-wave I=0 T-matrices." First, I should identify which terms are proper nouns or specific to the field. For example, "Ynduráin" is a person's name, so it should stay as is but with the correct diacritics in Korean. "Omnès" and "Muskhelishvili-Omnès" are also proper nouns related to the equations, so they should remain in English with Korean transliteration. Next, terms like "quadratic pion scalar radius" need to be translated accurately. "Pion" is 중성미자, "scalar radius" would be 스칼라 반지름. But I should check if there's a standard Korean term for "quadratic pion scalar radius." Maybe 이차 중성미자 스칼라 반지름. The notation \la r^2\ra^\pi_s uses angle brackets, which in physics often denote expectation values or averages. In Korean, this would typically be written as ⟨r²⟩^π_s. I need to make sure the notation is preserved correctly. The text mentions "phase shifts" which is 위상 이동 in Korean. "S-wave I=0" would be S-파 I=0. Terms like "T-matrices" are usually left as T-행렬 or T-매트릭스, but since it's a specific term in scattering theory, I should check if there's a standard translation. The phrase "continuity of the resulting pion scalar form factor" involves "form factor" which is 형태 인자 in Korean. "Continuity" is 연속성. There's a mention of QCD (Quantum Chromodynamics), which is 양자 색역학 in Korean. Now, looking at the structure: the text has several sentences with technical details. I need to ensure that each sentence is translated accurately without changing the meaning. Also, the numbers and units like 0.75±0.07 fm² should remain unchanged. The user emphasized preserving technical terms in English unless there's a well-established Korean equivalent. For example, "Muskhelishvili-Omnès equations" might not have a standard Korean translation, so it's better to keep them in English with Korean pronunciation. I should also check for any special formatting, like italics or subscripts. The original uses superscripts and subscripts in the notation, which need to be preserved. In Korean, subscripts and superscripts are usually represented similarly, so ⟨r²⟩^π_s would stay as ⟨r²⟩^π_s in the translation. Another point is the use of "fm²" (square femtometers), which is a unit. In Korean, it's 펨토미터 제곱, but often abbreviated as fm² even in Korean texts. The user also mentioned consolidating arbitrary line breaks. The original text seems to be a single paragraph, so I should maintain that structure unless there are natural breaks. However, the example response shows line breaks after periods, so maybe each sentence is a separate line. Wait, the user's instruction says to consolidate arbitrary line breaks from web content but maintain paragraph breaks that represent genuine topic shifts. Since the original is one paragraph, the translation should be one paragraph as well. Let me start translating sentence by sentence: 1. "The quadratic pion scalar radius, ⟨r²⟩^π_s, plays an important role for present precise determinations of ππ scattering." - 이차 중성미자 스칼라 반지름 ⟨r²⟩^π_s는 ππ 산란의 정밀한 결정에 있어 중요한 역할을 한다. 2. "Recently, Ynduráin, using an Omnès representation of the null isospin(I) non-strange pion scalar form factor, obtains ⟨r²⟩^π_s=0.75± 0.07 fm²." - 최근 Ynduráin은 동위원소 스핀(I=0) 비이상 중성미자 스칼라 형태 인자의 Omnès 표현을 사용하여 ⟨r²⟩^π_s=0.75±0.07 fm² 값을 얻었다. 3. "This value is larger than the one calculated by solving the corresponding Muskhelishvili-Omnès equations, ⟨r²⟩^π_s=0.61± 0.04 fm²." - 이 값은 대응하는 Muskhelishvili-Omnès 방정식을 풀어 계산한 ⟨r²⟩^π_s=0.61±0.04 fm²보다 크다. 4. "A large discrepancy between both values, given the precision, then results." - 주어진 정밀도를 고려할 때 두 값 사이에는 큰 차이가 있다. 5. "We reanalyze Ynduráin's method and show that by imposing continuity of the resulting pion scalar form factor under tiny changes in the input ππ phase shifts, a zero in the form factor for some S-wave I=0 T-matrices is then required." - 우리는 Ynduráin의 방법을 재분석하여 입력 ππ 위상 이동의 미세한 변화에 대해 결과로 얻어진 중성미자 스칼라 형태 인자의 연속성을 적용하면 일부 S-파 I=0 T-행렬에 대해 형태 인자에 영점이 존재함을 보인다. 6. "Once this is accounted for, the resulting value is ⟨r²⟩_s^π=0.65± 0.05 fm²." - 이를 고려한 경우, 결과로 ⟨r²⟩_s^π=0.65±0.05 fm²가 얻어진다. 7. "The main source of error in our determination is present experimental uncertainties in low energy S-wave I=0 ππ phase shifts." - 우리의 결정에서 오차의 주요 원인은 저에너지 S-파 I=0 ππ 위상 이동의 현재 실험적 불확실성이다. 8. "Another important contribution to our error is the not yet settled asymptotic behaviour of the phase of the scalar form factor from QCD." - 오차에 또 다른 중요한 기여는 QCD로부터 얻어진 스칼라 형태 인자 위상의 아직 결정되지 않은 점근적 행동이다. I need to check if all technical terms are correctly translated or kept in English. For example, "null isospin" is translated as 동위원소 스핀(I=0), which makes sense. "Muskhelishvili-Omnès equations" are kept as is. "QCD" is translated as QCD (양자 색역학) but the user might prefer the English abbreviation. However, the instruction says to prioritize Korean translations unless it's highly technical. Since QCD is a well-known term, it's better to use the Korean term here. Wait, but in the example response, they used QCD in English. Let me check the user's instruction again. The user says: "Prioritize Korean translations for all terms whenever possible. Only provide English terms in parentheses as a last resort for extremely specialized domain-specific terminology..." So QCD is 양자 색역학. However, in the example response provided by the user, they kept QCD as is. So maybe in this context, QCD is kept in English. Let me confirm. The original text uses "QCD," so according to the guidelines, since it's a technical term, it's acceptable to keep it in English. However, the user says to prioritize Korean translations. But for terms like QCD, which are universally recognized by their acronyms, it's better to keep them in English. So I'll leave QCD as is. Also, "phase shifts" is 위상 이동, which is correct. "S-wave I=0" is S-파 I=0. "T-matrices" is T-행렬. Check the notation: ⟨r²⟩^π_s vs ⟨r²⟩_s^π. In the original, the subscript and superscript positions might vary, but in the translation, the notation should remain as in the original. So in the fifth sentence, it's ⟨r²⟩_s^π, which should be ⟨r²⟩_s^π in Korean as well. Also, ensure that the ± symbol is used correctly with spaces. In Korean, it's common to write numbers with units without spaces, like 0.75±0.07 fm². Finally, review the entire translation to ensure that each sentence flows logically and that technical terms are consistently used. Make sure that there are no colloquial expressions and that the language remains formal and academic.
As in the cases of freeness and monotonic independence, the notion of conditional freeness is meaningful when complex-valued states are replaced by positive conditional expectations. In this framework, the paper presents several positivity results, a version of the central limit theorem and an analogue of the conditionally free R-transform constructed by means of multilinear function series.	자유성과 단조 독립성의 경우와 마찬가지로, 복소수 값 상태들이 양의 조건부 기대값으로 대체될 때 조건부 자유성의 개념은 의미를 갖는다. 이 체계에서 논문은 여러 양성 결과, 중심 극한 정리의 한 버전, 그리고 다중 선형 함수 급수를 이용하여 구성된 조건부 자유 R-변환의 아날로그를 제시한다.	true	Okay, I need to translate this academic text into Korean following the strict guidelines provided. Let me start by reading through the original text carefully to understand the context and key terms. The text mentions "freeness," "monotonic independence," and "conditional freeness." These are technical terms in the field of mathematics, specifically in areas like free probability theory. According to the guidelines, I should prioritize using established Korean translations for these terms if they exist. I'll check if there are standard translations for these terms in Korean academic literature. "Freeness" is often translated as "자유성," "monotonic independence" as "단조 독립성," and "conditional freeness" as "조건부 자유성." Next, "complex-valued states" should be translated as "복소수 값 상태들" and "positive conditional expectations" as "양의 조건부 기대값." The phrase "central limit theorem" is commonly known as "중심 극한 정리" in Korean. The term "R-transform" is a specific mathematical concept, and since it's a proper noun, it might stay in English with a possible Korean explanation in parentheses if needed. However, the guideline says to prioritize Korean translations, so I'll check if there's an established term. In many cases, "R-transform" is used as is in Korean academic contexts, so I'll keep it as "R-변환" but might add the English term in parentheses if necessary. Looking at the sentence structure, I need to translate each sentence individually while maintaining the flow. The first sentence is a bit complex. I'll break it down: "As in the cases of freeness and monotonic independence, the notion of conditional freeness is meaningful when complex-valued states are replaced by positive conditional expectations." Translating this, I'll ensure that the comparison structure is clear in Korean. The second sentence: "In this framework, the paper presents several positivity results, a version of the central limit theorem and an analogue of the conditionally free R-transform constructed by means of multilinear function series." Here, "positivity results" can be "양성 결과," "multilinear function series" as "다중 선형 함수 급수." The term "analogue" here refers to a similar concept in a different framework, so "아날로그" is acceptable in Korean academic writing. I need to check for any formatting elements. The original text doesn't have special formatting like bullet points or code, so I can focus on preserving the paragraph structure. The guidelines mention consolidating arbitrary line breaks, but since this is a single paragraph, I'll maintain it as one. Technical terms like "positive conditional expectations" must be accurately translated. I should ensure that terms like "positive" in this context are correctly rendered as "양의" rather than "긍정적인," which is more general. Also, the phrase "constructed by means of multilinear function series" should be translated to reflect the method used, so "다중 선형 함수 급수를 이용하여 구성된" seems appropriate. I need to make sure that the translated sentences flow logically in Korean, maintaining the formal academic tone. For example, "the paper presents several positivity results" becomes "논문은 여러 양성 결과, 중심 극한 정리의 한 버전, 그리고 다중 선형 함수 급수를 이용하여 구성된 조건부 자유 R-변환의 아날로그를 제시한다." I should verify if "conditionally free R-transform" is best translated as "조건부 자유 R-변환." Since "conditionally free" here refers to the framework of conditional freeness, "조건부 자유" is correct. Lastly, ensuring that all parts of the original text are included without omission or paraphrasing. Each element like "several positivity results," "a version of the central limit theorem," and "an analogue of the conditionally free R-transform" must be clearly present in the translation. After translating each part, I'll read through the Korean version to check for coherence and adherence to the guidelines, making sure technical terms are accurately translated and that the formal register is maintained.