kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols
Updated
•
625
•
6
kanaria007 PRO
kanaria007
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
posted
an
update
about 1 hour ago
✅ New Article: *Digital Constitution for SI Networks*
Title:
🏛️ Digital Constitution for SI Networks - Auditable Law Above Many SI-Cores
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/digital-constitution-for-si
---
*Summary:*
Single-system “AI ethics” doesn’t scale. Real deployments become *networks*: many independent SI-Core instances, across orgs and jurisdictions, sharing data and making effectful decisions in the same world.
This article proposes a *digital constitution layer*: a versioned, hash-chained set of *non-negotiable norms* and *minimum rights*, enforced *structurally* inside runtime gates — not as a PDF that nobody can verify.
> A constitution isn’t a document.
> *It’s an enforceable floor — with proofs.*
---
*Why It Matters:*
• Moves from “Is this system ethical?” → “What rules bind the whole network?”
• Defines *hard red lines* (prohibited actions) + *soft obligations* (logging, review, transparency)
• Makes compliance *auditable and replayable* (which constitution version applied, which norm fired, why)
• Provides a realistic path for *multi-jurisdiction conflict handling* and constitutional amendments
---
*What’s Inside:*
• Three-layer model: local policy → org/sector charters → *network-level constitution*
• Constitutional objects: versioned constitution IDs, scope tags, compiled norms
• Runtime behavior: hard-stops, obligations, evidence trails, and “no external effect” guarantees
• Amendment lifecycle: shadow-mode simulation → ratification → staged rollout → historical replay
• What regulators actually see: status pages, norm-sliced metrics, incident reports, cross-border traces
---
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
If SI is going to operate across cities, hospitals, grids, and nations, then governance must be *structural, measurable, and enforceable* — not rhetorical.
published
an
article
about 1 hour ago
Digital Constitution for SI Networks - Auditable Law Above Many SI-Cores
posted
an
update
1 day ago
✅ New Article: *Deep-Space SI-Core — Autonomy Across Light-Hours*
Title:
🚀 Deep-Space SI-Core: Autonomy Across Light-Hours - How an onboard SI-Core evolves safely while Earth is hours away
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/deep-space-si-core
---
Summary:
Most autonomy stories quietly assume “someone can intervene in minutes.” Deep space breaks that assumption.
With 2–6 hours round-trip latency and intermittent links, an onboard SI-Core must act as a *local sovereign*—while remaining *globally accountable* to Earth.
This note sketches how mission continuity survives when nobody is listening: DTN-style semantic bundles, local vs. global rollback, bounded self-improvement, and auditability that still works after contact windows return.
> Autonomy isn’t a divorce from governance—
> it’s a measured loan of authority, under a constitution, with evidence.
---
Why It Matters:
• Makes “autonomous” mean *operational*, not rhetorical, under light-hour delays
• Clarifies how rollback works when you can’t undo physics—only *policy trajectories*
• Shows how an onboard core can *self-improve without drifting out of spec*
• Treats *silence itself as an observation* (missing logs are governance signals)
---
What’s Inside:
• Two-core model: *Earth-Core (constitutional/strategic)* vs *Ship-Core (tactical/operational)*
• *SCP over DTN* as semantic bundles (priorities, idempotency, meaning checkpoints)
• Local rollback vs. epoch-level governance (“retroactive” steering without pretending to reverse time)
• Bounded onboard learning + LearningTrace for later audit and resync
• Stress scenario walkthrough: micrometeoroid storm, compound failures, and graceful degradation
• Metrics framing for deep space: governability, audit completeness, ethics uptime, rollback integrity
---
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
Organizations
None yet