Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -12,4 +12,264 @@ metrics:
|
|
12 |
- accuracy
|
13 |
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
14 |
library_name: transformers
|
15 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
- accuracy
|
13 |
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
14 |
library_name: transformers
|
15 |
+
---
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
# UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul Model Card
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
## Model Overview
|
20 |
+
|
21 |
+
`UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul` is a multi-task model based on Microsoft's `unixcoder-base`, fine-tuned to detect vulnerabilities (`vul`) and classify Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) types in code snippets. It was developed by [mahdin70](https://huggingface.co/mahdin70) and trained on a balanced dataset combining BigVul and PrimeVul datasets. The model performs binary classification for vulnerability detection and multi-class classification for CWE identification.
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
+
- **Model Repository**: [mahdin70/UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul](https://huggingface.co/mahdin70/UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul)
|
24 |
+
- **Base Model**: [microsoft/unixcoder-base](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/unixcoder-base)
|
25 |
+
- **Tasks**: Vulnerability Detection (Binary), CWE Classification (Multi-class)
|
26 |
+
- **License**: MIT (assumed; adjust if different)
|
27 |
+
- **Date**: Trained and uploaded as of March 11, 2025
|
28 |
+
|
29 |
+
## Model Architecture
|
30 |
+
|
31 |
+
The model extends `unixcoder-base` with two task-specific heads:
|
32 |
+
- **Vulnerability Head**: A linear layer mapping 768-dimensional hidden states to 2 classes (vulnerable or not).
|
33 |
+
- **CWE Head**: A linear layer mapping 768-dimensional hidden states to 135 classes (134 CWE types + 1 for "no CWE").
|
34 |
+
|
35 |
+
The architecture is implemented as a custom `MultiTaskUnixCoder` class in PyTorch, with the loss computed as the sum of cross-entropy losses for both tasks.
|
36 |
+
|
37 |
+
## Training Dataset
|
38 |
+
|
39 |
+
The model was trained on the `mahdin70/balanced_merged_bigvul_primevul` dataset (configuration: `10_per_commit`), which combines:
|
40 |
+
- **BigVul**: A dataset of real-world vulnerabilities from open-source projects.
|
41 |
+
- **PrimeVul**: A dataset focused on prime vulnerabilities in code.
|
42 |
+
|
43 |
+
### Dataset Details
|
44 |
+
- **Splits**:
|
45 |
+
- Train: 124,780 samples
|
46 |
+
- Validation: 26,740 samples
|
47 |
+
- Test: 26,738 samples
|
48 |
+
- **Features**:
|
49 |
+
- `func`: Code snippet (text)
|
50 |
+
- `vul`: Binary label (0 = non-vulnerable, 1 = vulnerable)
|
51 |
+
- `CWE ID`: CWE identifier (e.g., CWE-89) or None for non-vulnerable samples
|
52 |
+
- **Preprocessing**:
|
53 |
+
- CWE labels were encoded using a `LabelEncoder` with 134 unique CWE classes identified across the dataset.
|
54 |
+
- Non-vulnerable samples assigned a CWE label of -1 (mapped to 0 in the model).
|
55 |
+
|
56 |
+
The dataset is balanced to ensure a fair representation of vulnerable and non-vulnerable samples, with a maximum of 10 samples per commit where applicable.
|
57 |
+
|
58 |
+
## Training Details
|
59 |
+
|
60 |
+
### Training Arguments
|
61 |
+
The model was trained using the Hugging Face `Trainer` API with the following arguments:
|
62 |
+
- **Output Directory**: `./unixcoder_multitask`
|
63 |
+
- **Evaluation Strategy**: Per epoch
|
64 |
+
- **Save Strategy**: Per epoch
|
65 |
+
- **Learning Rate**: 2e-5
|
66 |
+
- **Batch Size**: 8 (per device, train and eval)
|
67 |
+
- **Epochs**: 3
|
68 |
+
- **Weight Decay**: 0.01
|
69 |
+
- **Logging**: Every 10 steps, logged to `./logs`
|
70 |
+
- **WANDB**: Disabled
|
71 |
+
|
72 |
+
### Training Environment
|
73 |
+
- **Hardware**: NVIDIA Tesla T4 GPU
|
74 |
+
- **Framework**: PyTorch 2.5.1+cu121, Transformers 4.47.0
|
75 |
+
- **Duration**: ~6 hours, 34 minutes, 53 seconds (23,397 steps)
|
76 |
+
|
77 |
+
### Training Metrics
|
78 |
+
Validation metrics across epochs:
|
79 |
+
|
80 |
+
| Epoch | Training Loss | Validation Loss | Vul Accuracy | Vul Precision | Vul Recall | Vul F1 | CWE Accuracy |
|
81 |
+
|-------|---------------|-----------------|--------------|---------------|------------|----------|--------------|
|
82 |
+
| 1 | 0.3038 | 0.4997 | 0.9570 | 0.8082 | 0.5379 | 0.6459 | 0.1887 |
|
83 |
+
| 2 | 0.6092 | 0.4859 | 0.9587 | 0.8118 | 0.5641 | 0.6657 | 0.2964 |
|
84 |
+
| 3 | 0.4261 | 0.5090 | 0.9585 | 0.8114 | 0.5605 | 0.6630 | 0.3323 |
|
85 |
+
|
86 |
+
- **Final Training Loss**: 0.4430 (average over all steps)
|
87 |
+
|
88 |
+
## Evaluation
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
The model was evaluated on the test split (26,738 samples) with the following metrics:
|
91 |
+
- **Vulnerability Detection**:
|
92 |
+
- Accuracy: 0.9571
|
93 |
+
- Precision: 0.7947
|
94 |
+
- Recall: 0.5437
|
95 |
+
- F1 Score: 0.6457
|
96 |
+
- **CWE Classification** (on vulnerable samples):
|
97 |
+
- Accuracy: 0.3288
|
98 |
+
|
99 |
+
The model excels at identifying non-vulnerable code (high accuracy) but has moderate recall for vulnerabilities and lower CWE classification accuracy, indicating room for improvement in CWE prediction.
|
100 |
+
|
101 |
+
## Usage
|
102 |
+
|
103 |
+
### Installation
|
104 |
+
Install the required libraries:
|
105 |
+
```bash
|
106 |
+
pip install transformers torch datasets huggingface_hub
|
107 |
+
|
108 |
+
```
|
109 |
+
Apologies for the oversight! Below is the corrected README.md with the entire content, including the "Sample Code Snippet" section through to the end, formatted properly in Markdown.
|
110 |
+
|
111 |
+
markdown
|
112 |
+
|
113 |
+
Collapse
|
114 |
+
|
115 |
+
Wrap
|
116 |
+
|
117 |
+
Copy
|
118 |
+
# UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul Model Card
|
119 |
+
|
120 |
+
## Model Overview
|
121 |
+
|
122 |
+
`UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul` is a multi-task model based on Microsoft's `unixcoder-base`, fine-tuned to detect vulnerabilities (`vul`) and classify Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) types in code snippets. It was developed by [mahdin70](https://huggingface.co/mahdin70) and trained on a balanced dataset combining BigVul and PrimeVul datasets. The model performs binary classification for vulnerability detection and multi-class classification for CWE identification.
|
123 |
+
|
124 |
+
- **Model Repository**: [mahdin70/UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul](https://huggingface.co/mahdin70/UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul)
|
125 |
+
- **Base Model**: [microsoft/unixcoder-base](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/unixcoder-base)
|
126 |
+
- **Tasks**: Vulnerability Detection (Binary), CWE Classification (Multi-class)
|
127 |
+
- **License**: MIT (assumed; adjust if different)
|
128 |
+
- **Date**: Trained and uploaded as of March 11, 2025
|
129 |
+
|
130 |
+
## Model Architecture
|
131 |
+
|
132 |
+
The model extends `unixcoder-base` with two task-specific heads:
|
133 |
+
- **Vulnerability Head**: A linear layer mapping 768-dimensional hidden states to 2 classes (vulnerable or not).
|
134 |
+
- **CWE Head**: A linear layer mapping 768-dimensional hidden states to 135 classes (134 CWE types + 1 for "no CWE").
|
135 |
+
|
136 |
+
The architecture is implemented as a custom `MultiTaskUnixCoder` class in PyTorch, with the loss computed as the sum of cross-entropy losses for both tasks.
|
137 |
+
|
138 |
+
## Training Dataset
|
139 |
+
|
140 |
+
The model was trained on the `mahdin70/balanced_merged_bigvul_primevul` dataset (configuration: `10_per_commit`), which combines:
|
141 |
+
- **BigVul**: A dataset of real-world vulnerabilities from open-source projects.
|
142 |
+
- **PrimeVul**: A dataset focused on prime vulnerabilities in code.
|
143 |
+
|
144 |
+
### Dataset Details
|
145 |
+
- **Splits**:
|
146 |
+
- Train: 124,780 samples
|
147 |
+
- Validation: 26,740 samples
|
148 |
+
- Test: 26,738 samples
|
149 |
+
- **Features**:
|
150 |
+
- `func`: Code snippet (text)
|
151 |
+
- `vul`: Binary label (0 = non-vulnerable, 1 = vulnerable)
|
152 |
+
- `CWE ID`: CWE identifier (e.g., CWE-89) or None for non-vulnerable samples
|
153 |
+
- **Preprocessing**:
|
154 |
+
- CWE labels were encoded using a `LabelEncoder` with 134 unique CWE classes identified across the dataset.
|
155 |
+
- Non-vulnerable samples assigned a CWE label of -1 (mapped to 0 in the model).
|
156 |
+
|
157 |
+
The dataset is balanced to ensure a fair representation of vulnerable and non-vulnerable samples, with a maximum of 10 samples per commit where applicable.
|
158 |
+
|
159 |
+
## Training Details
|
160 |
+
|
161 |
+
### Training Arguments
|
162 |
+
The model was trained using the Hugging Face `Trainer` API with the following arguments:
|
163 |
+
- **Output Directory**: `./unixcoder_multitask`
|
164 |
+
- **Evaluation Strategy**: Per epoch
|
165 |
+
- **Save Strategy**: Per epoch
|
166 |
+
- **Learning Rate**: 2e-5
|
167 |
+
- **Batch Size**: 8 (per device, train and eval)
|
168 |
+
- **Epochs**: 3
|
169 |
+
- **Weight Decay**: 0.01
|
170 |
+
- **Logging**: Every 10 steps, logged to `./logs`
|
171 |
+
- **WANDB**: Disabled
|
172 |
+
|
173 |
+
### Training Environment
|
174 |
+
- **Hardware**: NVIDIA Tesla T4 GPU
|
175 |
+
- **Framework**: PyTorch 2.5.1+cu121, Transformers 4.47.0
|
176 |
+
- **Duration**: ~6 hours, 34 minutes, 53 seconds (23,397 steps)
|
177 |
+
|
178 |
+
### Training Metrics
|
179 |
+
Validation metrics across epochs:
|
180 |
+
|
181 |
+
| Epoch | Training Loss | Validation Loss | Vul Accuracy | Vul Precision | Vul Recall | Vul F1 | CWE Accuracy |
|
182 |
+
|-------|---------------|-----------------|--------------|---------------|------------|----------|--------------|
|
183 |
+
| 1 | 0.3038 | 0.4997 | 0.9570 | 0.8082 | 0.5379 | 0.6459 | 0.1887 |
|
184 |
+
| 2 | 0.6092 | 0.4859 | 0.9587 | 0.8118 | 0.5641 | 0.6657 | 0.2964 |
|
185 |
+
| 3 | 0.4261 | 0.5090 | 0.9585 | 0.8114 | 0.5605 | 0.6630 | 0.3323 |
|
186 |
+
|
187 |
+
- **Final Training Loss**: 0.4430 (average over all steps)
|
188 |
+
|
189 |
+
## Evaluation
|
190 |
+
|
191 |
+
The model was evaluated on the test split (26,738 samples) with the following metrics:
|
192 |
+
- **Vulnerability Detection**:
|
193 |
+
- Accuracy: 0.9571
|
194 |
+
- Precision: 0.7947
|
195 |
+
- Recall: 0.5437
|
196 |
+
- F1 Score: 0.6457
|
197 |
+
- **CWE Classification** (on vulnerable samples):
|
198 |
+
- Accuracy: 0.3288
|
199 |
+
|
200 |
+
The model excels at identifying non-vulnerable code (high accuracy) but has moderate recall for vulnerabilities and lower CWE classification accuracy, indicating room for improvement in CWE prediction.
|
201 |
+
|
202 |
+
## Usage
|
203 |
+
|
204 |
+
### Installation
|
205 |
+
Install the required libraries:
|
206 |
+
```bash
|
207 |
+
pip install transformers torch datasets huggingface_hub
|
208 |
+
```
|
209 |
+
|
210 |
+
### Sample Code Snippet
|
211 |
+
Below is an example of how to use the model for inference on a code snippet:
|
212 |
+
|
213 |
+
```python
|
214 |
+
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModel
|
215 |
+
import torch
|
216 |
+
|
217 |
+
# Load tokenizer and model
|
218 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("microsoft/unixcoder-base")
|
219 |
+
model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("mahdin70/UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul", trust_remote_code=True)
|
220 |
+
model.eval()
|
221 |
+
|
222 |
+
# Example code snippet
|
223 |
+
code = """
|
224 |
+
void example(char *input) {
|
225 |
+
char buffer[10];
|
226 |
+
strcpy(buffer, input);
|
227 |
+
}
|
228 |
+
"""
|
229 |
+
|
230 |
+
# Tokenize input
|
231 |
+
inputs = tokenizer(code, return_tensors="pt", padding="max_length", truncation=True, max_length=512)
|
232 |
+
|
233 |
+
# Move to GPU if available
|
234 |
+
device = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
|
235 |
+
model.to(device)
|
236 |
+
inputs = {k: v.to(device) for k, v in inputs.items()}
|
237 |
+
|
238 |
+
# Get predictions
|
239 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
240 |
+
outputs = model(**inputs)
|
241 |
+
vul_logits = outputs["vul_logits"]
|
242 |
+
cwe_logits = outputs["cwe_logits"]
|
243 |
+
|
244 |
+
# Vulnerability prediction
|
245 |
+
vul_pred = torch.argmax(vul_logits, dim=1).item()
|
246 |
+
print(f"Vulnerability: {'Vulnerable' if vul_pred == 1 else 'Not Vulnerable'}")
|
247 |
+
|
248 |
+
# CWE prediction (if vulnerable)
|
249 |
+
if vul_pred == 1:
|
250 |
+
cwe_pred = torch.argmax(cwe_logits, dim=1).item() - 1 # Subtract 1 as -1 is "no CWE"
|
251 |
+
print(f"Predicted CWE: {cwe_pred if cwe_pred >= 0 else 'None'}")
|
252 |
+
|
253 |
+
```
|
254 |
+
|
255 |
+
### Output Example:
|
256 |
+
|
257 |
+
```bash
|
258 |
+
Vulnerability: Vulnerable
|
259 |
+
Predicted CWE: 120 # Maps to CWE-120 (Buffer Overflow), depending on encoder
|
260 |
+
```
|
261 |
+
|
262 |
+
## Notes:
|
263 |
+
|
264 |
+
The CWE prediction is an integer index (0 to 133). To map it to a specific CWE ID (e.g., CWE-120), you need the LabelEncoder used during training, available in the dataset preprocessing step.
|
265 |
+
Ensure trust_remote_code=True as the model uses custom code from the repository.
|
266 |
+
|
267 |
+
## Limitations
|
268 |
+
- CWE Accuracy: The model struggles with precise CWE classification (32.88% accuracy), likely due to class imbalance or complexity in distinguishing similar CWE types.
|
269 |
+
- Recall: Moderate recall (54.37%) for vulnerability detection suggests some vulnerable samples may be missed.
|
270 |
+
- Generalization: Trained on BigVul and PrimeVul, performance may vary on out-of-domain codebases.
|
271 |
+
|
272 |
+
## Future Improvements
|
273 |
+
- Increase training epochs or dataset size for better CWE accuracy.
|
274 |
+
- Experiment with class weighting to address CWE imbalance.
|
275 |
+
- Fine-tune on additional datasets for broader generalization.
|