Boosting Multimodal Reasoning with MCTS-Automated Structured Thinking
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) exhibit impressive capabilities but still face challenges in complex visual reasoning. While recent efforts attempt to enhance MLLMs' reasoning by incorporating OpenAI o1-like structured thinking through explicit search structures or teacher-guided distillation, they often struggle to balance performance and efficiency. A critical limitation is their heavy reliance on extensive data and search spaces, resulting in low-efficiency implicit insight extraction and data utilization. To address this, we propose AStar, an Automated Structured thinking paradigm for multimodal reasoning via Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). AStar automatically derives high-level cognitive reasoning patterns from limited data using MCTS-powered hierarchical structures. Building on these explicit patterns, we design a unified reasoning framework that seamlessly integrates models' internal reasoning capabilities and external reasoning guidelines, enabling efficient inference with minimal tree iterations. This novel paradigm strikes a compelling balance between performance and efficiency. Extensive experiments demonstrate AStar's effectiveness, achieving superior accuracy (54.0%) on the MathVerse benchmark with a 7B backbone, surpassing GPT-4o (50.2%) while maintaining substantial data and computational efficiency.
Community
๐ We are pleased to share our latest research paper, "Boosting Multimodal Reasoning with MCTS-Automated Structured Thinking". This work introduces AStar, an automated structured thinking paradigm for multimodal reasoning via MCTS.
๐ AStar automatically derives high-level cognitive reasoning patterns from limited data using MCTS-powered hierarchical structures. Building on these explicit patterns, we design a unified reasoning framework that seamlessly integrates models' internal reasoning capabilities and external reasoning guidelines, enabling efficient inference with minimal tree iterations. This novel paradigm strikes a compelling balance between performance and efficiency. Extensive experiments demonstrate AStar's effectiveness, achieving superior accuracy (54.0%) on the MathVerse benchmark with a 7B backbone, surpassing GPT-4o (50.2%) while maintaining substantial data and computational efficiency.
๐ Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.02339
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Mulberry: Empowering MLLM with o1-like Reasoning and Reflection via Collective Monte Carlo Tree Search (2024)
- URSA: Understanding and Verifying Chain-of-thought Reasoning in Multimodal Mathematics (2025)
- rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking (2025)
- Enhancing Reasoning through Process Supervision with Monte Carlo Tree Search (2025)
- Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts: Framework for Superior Reasoning and Knowledge Propagation in Large Language Models (2025)
- Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search (2025)
- Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval (2024)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
I read the paper with great interest, but I noticed that the case in Figure 3 bears a striking resemblance to our work, We-Math. However, I could not find any reference to our work in your paper.
I would appreciate it if you could address this citation omission in any future publications or revisions. I'm happy to provide additional technical details about our dataset design if needed.
We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback on our paper. We sincerely apologize for the oversight in not citing your work, "We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?", particularly regarding the multimodal input example utilized in Figure 3 of your dataset. This omission was due to our oversight during the paper writing process. We will ensure that your work is properly cited in our future revisions.
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper