τ^2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
Abstract
tau²-bench introduces a dual-control benchmark for conversational AI agents in telecommunications, simulating user-agent collaboration and evaluating their performance in reasoning and coordination.
Existing benchmarks for conversational AI agents simulate single-control environments, where only the AI agent can use tools to interact with the world, while the user remains a passive information provider. This differs from real-world scenarios like technical support, where users need to actively participate in modifying the state of the (shared) world. In order to address this gap, we introduce tau^2-bench, with four key contributions: 1) A novel Telecom dual-control domain modeled as a Dec-POMDP, where both agent and user make use of tools to act in a shared, dynamic environment that tests both agent coordination and communication, 2) A compositional task generator that programmatically creates diverse, verifiable tasks from atomic components, ensuring domain coverage and controlled complexity, 3) A reliable user simulator tightly coupled with the environment, whose behavior is constrained by tools and observable states, improving simulation fidelity, 4) Fine-grained analysis of agent performance through multiple ablations including separating errors arising from reasoning vs communication/coordination. In particular, our experiments show significant performance drops when agents shift from no-user to dual-control, highlighting the challenges of guiding users. Overall, tau^2-bench provides a controlled testbed for agents that must both reason effectively and guide user actions.
Community
Existing benchmarks for conversational AI agents simulate single-control environments, where only the AI agent can use tools to interact with the world, while the user remains a passive information provider. This differs from real-world scenarios like technical support, where users need to actively participate in modifying the state of the (shared) world. In order to address this gap, we introduce τ²-bench, with four key contributions:
- A novel Telecom dual-control domain modeled as a Dec-POMDP, where both agent and user make use of tools to act in a shared, dynamic environment that tests both agent coordination and communication,
- A compositional task generator that programmatically creates diverse, verifiable tasks from atomic components, ensuring domain coverage and controlled complexity,
- A reliable user simulator tightly coupled with the environment, whose behavior is constrained by tools and observable states, improving simulation fidelity,
- Fine-grained analysis of agent performance through multiple ablations including separating errors arising from reasoning vs communication/coordination.
In particular, our experiments show significant performance drops when agents shift from no-user to dual-control, highlighting the challenges of guiding users. Overall, τ²-bench provides a controlled testbed for agents that must both reason effectively and guide user actions.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- VS-Bench: Evaluating VLMs for Strategic Reasoning and Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Environments (2025)
- IDA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Interactive Guided Data Analysis (2025)
- From Strangers to Assistants: Fast Desire Alignment for Embodied Agent-User Adaptation (2025)
- Agent Context Protocols Enhance Collective Inference (2025)
- Can Agents Fix Agent Issues? (2025)
- T1: A Tool-Oriented Conversational Dataset for Multi-Turn Agentic Planning (2025)
- PIPA: A Unified Evaluation Protocol for Diagnosing Interactive Planning Agents (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper