DRIFT: Learning from Abundant User Dissatisfaction in Real-World Preference Learning
Abstract
DRIFT, a dissatisfaction-refined iterative preference training method, improves large language models using implicit user dissatisfaction signals, achieving better performance than existing methods on real-world datasets.
Real-world large language model deployments (e.g., conversational AI systems, code generation assistants) naturally generate abundant implicit user dissatisfaction (DSAT) signals, as users iterate toward better answers through refinements, corrections, and expressed preferences, while explicit satisfaction (SAT) feedback is scarce. Existing preference learning approaches are poorly aligned with this data profile, as they rely on costly human annotations or assume plentiful positive responses. In this paper, we introduce DRIFT (Dissatisfaction-Refined Iterative preFerence Training), which anchors training on real-world DSAT signals and samples positives dynamically from the evolving policy. Empirically, DRIFT models trained on real-world WildFeedback datasets and synthetic UltraFeedback datasets achieve up to +6.23\% (7B) / +7.61\% (14B) on WildBench Task Score and up to +8.95\% (7B) / +12.29\% (14B) on AlpacaEval2 win rate over base models, outperforming strong baseline methods such as iterative DPO and SPIN. At larger scales, the improvements are particularly pronounced: 14B models trained with DRIFT surpass GPT-4o-mini on WildBench. Further analysis shows that DRIFT also preserves exploratory capacity, yielding more diverse high-reward solutions rather than collapsing to narrow subsets. Theoretically, we demonstrate that this design preserves preference margins and avoids the gradient degeneration. These results show that DRIFT is an effective and scalable recipe for real-world post-training that leverages the most abundant and informative signal. The code and data are available at https://github.com/cacayaya/DRIFT.git.
Community
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- The Era of Real-World Human Interaction: RL from User Conversations (2025)
- On Negative-aware Preference Optimization for Recommendation (2025)
- Language Models Can Learn from Verbal Feedback Without Scalar Rewards (2025)
- From Clicks to Preference: A Multi-stage Alignment Framework for Generative Query Suggestion in Conversational System (2025)
- PromptCoT 2.0: Scaling Prompt Synthesis for Large Language Model Reasoning (2025)
- Learning from Natural Language Feedback for Personalized Question Answering (2025)
- T-POP: Test-Time Personalization with Online Preference Feedback (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 3
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper