Spaces:
Running
Running
James MacQuillan
commited on
Commit
·
ffb6bce
1
Parent(s):
6ac2591
push
Browse files- app.py +1 -1
- healthcheck.txt +79 -25
- investmentvaluation.txt +0 -0
app.py
CHANGED
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ def process_query(user_input, history):
|
|
117 |
# Step 3: Generate a response using the search results
|
118 |
response = client.chat_completion(
|
119 |
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct",
|
120 |
-
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": f"Using the search results: {search_results_str} and chat history {history}, answer the user's query '{user_input}' concisely, using numerical data if available. "}],
|
121 |
max_tokens=3000,
|
122 |
stream=True
|
123 |
)
|
|
|
117 |
# Step 3: Generate a response using the search results
|
118 |
response = client.chat_completion(
|
119 |
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct",
|
120 |
+
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": f"Using the search results: {search_results_str} and chat history {history}, answer the user's query '{user_input}' concisely, using numerical data if available. if they are just making conversation, respond normally, without the data "}],
|
121 |
max_tokens=3000,
|
122 |
stream=True
|
123 |
)
|
healthcheck.txt
CHANGED
@@ -1,23 +1,28 @@
|
|
1 |
Objective
|
2 |
-
This file outlines a structured approach to evaluate the financial health of a company using a set of key financial ratios and metrics. The model
|
3 |
|
4 |
Metrics and Ratios
|
5 |
1. Liquidity Ratios
|
6 |
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
|
7 |
Interpretation: A ratio between 1.5 and 3.0 is generally considered healthy. Below 1 indicates potential liquidity issues, while above 3 could signal inefficient capital allocation.
|
|
|
8 |
Quick Ratio = (Current Assets - Inventory) / Current Liabilities
|
9 |
-
Interpretation: A ratio above 1 indicates that the company can cover short-term obligations without selling inventory,
|
|
|
10 |
Logic:
|
11 |
|
12 |
If Current Ratio < 1 or Quick Ratio < 0.8, mark as “Weak Liquidity.”
|
13 |
-
If Current Ratio is between 1.5 and 3
|
14 |
2. Profitability Ratios
|
15 |
Gross Profit Margin = (Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue
|
16 |
Interpretation: Indicates core profitability before operational expenses. Higher values signal cost efficiency.
|
|
|
17 |
Net Profit Margin = Net Income / Revenue
|
18 |
Interpretation: Represents final profitability after all expenses. Higher percentages generally indicate a profitable business.
|
|
|
19 |
Return on Assets (ROA) = Net Income / Total Assets
|
20 |
Interpretation: Shows how effectively assets generate profit, with values over 5% considered healthy.
|
|
|
21 |
Logic:
|
22 |
|
23 |
High margins and ROA (>5%) indicate strong profitability, labeled as “Strong Profitability.”
|
@@ -25,8 +30,10 @@ If either margin is consistently low (<5%) over recent periods, flag as “Profi
|
|
25 |
3. Leverage Ratios
|
26 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio = Total Debt / Total Equity
|
27 |
Interpretation: A ratio below 2 is typically favorable, as it indicates less reliance on debt.
|
|
|
28 |
Interest Coverage Ratio = Earnings Before Interest & Taxes (EBIT) / Interest Expense
|
29 |
Interpretation: Values above 3 suggest that the company can comfortably pay its interest expenses.
|
|
|
30 |
Logic:
|
31 |
|
32 |
If Debt-to-Equity < 2 and Interest Coverage > 3, label as “Low Financial Risk.”
|
@@ -34,8 +41,10 @@ If Debt-to-Equity > 3 or Interest Coverage < 1.5, flag as “High Financial Risk
|
|
34 |
4. Efficiency Ratios
|
35 |
Asset Turnover Ratio = Revenue / Total Assets
|
36 |
Interpretation: High values indicate efficient asset utilization.
|
|
|
37 |
Inventory Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory
|
38 |
Interpretation: High turnover rates indicate efficient inventory management.
|
|
|
39 |
Logic:
|
40 |
|
41 |
If Asset Turnover is above industry average and Inventory Turnover shows strong movement, mark as “Efficient Operations.”
|
@@ -43,25 +52,27 @@ Low turnover rates suggest operational inefficiencies, flagged as “Operational
|
|
43 |
5. Growth Ratios
|
44 |
Revenue Growth Rate (year-over-year or quarter-over-quarter)
|
45 |
Interpretation: Positive, sustainable growth indicates business expansion.
|
|
|
46 |
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth = (EPS in current period - EPS in prior period) / EPS in prior period
|
47 |
Interpretation: Consistent positive EPS growth implies profitability and investor confidence.
|
|
|
48 |
Logic:
|
49 |
|
50 |
Strong growth in Revenue and EPS indicates “Positive Growth,” while negative trends raise “Growth Concerns.”
|
51 |
Scoring Logic: QuantiNeuron Health Check Score
|
52 |
-
To derive a QuantiNeuron Health Check Score (1-10), assign weighted values to each category based on their contribution to financial health. This score is a weighted aggregate that emphasizes profitability and liquidity, followed by leverage, efficiency, and growth.
|
53 |
-
|
54 |
-
Step 1: Assign Ratings (1-5) for Each Metric
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
Based on each metric’s analysis, assign scores:
|
57 |
-
|
58 |
-
|
59 |
-
|
60 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
1 = Very Weak
|
62 |
Step 2: Weighted Category Score Calculation
|
63 |
-
|
64 |
-
Weight each category:
|
65 |
|
66 |
Profitability: 25%
|
67 |
Liquidity: 20%
|
@@ -72,15 +83,16 @@ Calculate weighted scores for each category:
|
|
72 |
|
73 |
Category Score
|
74 |
=
|
75 |
-
(
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
×
|
77 |
Weight
|
78 |
Category Score=(Category Rating)×Weight
|
79 |
Step 3: Aggregate for Final Score
|
80 |
-
|
81 |
Sum up the weighted scores to derive a total score out of 10.
|
82 |
-
Step 4: Determine Health Check Tier
|
83 |
|
|
|
84 |
Score 9-10: “Excellent Health” (Low risk, high profitability)
|
85 |
Score 7-8: “Good Health” (Generally strong but minor areas to improve)
|
86 |
Score 5-6: “Moderate Health” (Mixed performance; moderate risk)
|
@@ -96,19 +108,61 @@ Efficient operations,
|
|
96 |
Moderate growth,
|
97 |
The model might assign:
|
98 |
|
99 |
-
Liquidity =
|
100 |
-
Calculating:
|
101 |
|
102 |
-
Liquidity Score =
|
103 |
-
|
104 |
-
|
105 |
-
|
106 |
-
|
107 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
109 |
Output
|
110 |
-
|
111 |
|
112 |
A QuantiNeuron Health Check Score on a 1-10 scale.
|
113 |
A Health Summary, outlining strengths and weaknesses based on metrics.
|
114 |
-
A Recommendation
|
|
|
1 |
Objective
|
2 |
+
This file outlines a structured approach to evaluate the financial health of a company using a set of key financial ratios and metrics. The model analyzes these ratios, applies context-specific logic, and derives a health score on a scale from 1 to 10. This score—known as the QuantiNeuron Health Check Score—serves as a snapshot indicator of the company's current financial viability.
|
3 |
|
4 |
Metrics and Ratios
|
5 |
1. Liquidity Ratios
|
6 |
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
|
7 |
Interpretation: A ratio between 1.5 and 3.0 is generally considered healthy. Below 1 indicates potential liquidity issues, while above 3 could signal inefficient capital allocation.
|
8 |
+
|
9 |
Quick Ratio = (Current Assets - Inventory) / Current Liabilities
|
10 |
+
Interpretation: A ratio above 1 indicates that the company can cover short-term obligations without selling inventory, suggesting robust liquidity.
|
11 |
+
|
12 |
Logic:
|
13 |
|
14 |
If Current Ratio < 1 or Quick Ratio < 0.8, mark as “Weak Liquidity.”
|
15 |
+
If Current Ratio is between 1.5 and 3 and Quick Ratio > 1, mark as “Healthy Liquidity.”
|
16 |
2. Profitability Ratios
|
17 |
Gross Profit Margin = (Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue
|
18 |
Interpretation: Indicates core profitability before operational expenses. Higher values signal cost efficiency.
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
Net Profit Margin = Net Income / Revenue
|
21 |
Interpretation: Represents final profitability after all expenses. Higher percentages generally indicate a profitable business.
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
Return on Assets (ROA) = Net Income / Total Assets
|
24 |
Interpretation: Shows how effectively assets generate profit, with values over 5% considered healthy.
|
25 |
+
|
26 |
Logic:
|
27 |
|
28 |
High margins and ROA (>5%) indicate strong profitability, labeled as “Strong Profitability.”
|
|
|
30 |
3. Leverage Ratios
|
31 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio = Total Debt / Total Equity
|
32 |
Interpretation: A ratio below 2 is typically favorable, as it indicates less reliance on debt.
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
Interest Coverage Ratio = Earnings Before Interest & Taxes (EBIT) / Interest Expense
|
35 |
Interpretation: Values above 3 suggest that the company can comfortably pay its interest expenses.
|
36 |
+
|
37 |
Logic:
|
38 |
|
39 |
If Debt-to-Equity < 2 and Interest Coverage > 3, label as “Low Financial Risk.”
|
|
|
41 |
4. Efficiency Ratios
|
42 |
Asset Turnover Ratio = Revenue / Total Assets
|
43 |
Interpretation: High values indicate efficient asset utilization.
|
44 |
+
|
45 |
Inventory Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory
|
46 |
Interpretation: High turnover rates indicate efficient inventory management.
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
Logic:
|
49 |
|
50 |
If Asset Turnover is above industry average and Inventory Turnover shows strong movement, mark as “Efficient Operations.”
|
|
|
52 |
5. Growth Ratios
|
53 |
Revenue Growth Rate (year-over-year or quarter-over-quarter)
|
54 |
Interpretation: Positive, sustainable growth indicates business expansion.
|
55 |
+
|
56 |
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth = (EPS in current period - EPS in prior period) / EPS in prior period
|
57 |
Interpretation: Consistent positive EPS growth implies profitability and investor confidence.
|
58 |
+
|
59 |
Logic:
|
60 |
|
61 |
Strong growth in Revenue and EPS indicates “Positive Growth,” while negative trends raise “Growth Concerns.”
|
62 |
Scoring Logic: QuantiNeuron Health Check Score
|
63 |
+
To derive a QuantiNeuron Health Check Score (1-10), we assign weighted values to each category based on their contribution to financial health. This score is a weighted aggregate that emphasizes profitability and liquidity, followed by leverage, efficiency, and growth.
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
65 |
+
Step 1: Assign Ratings (1-10) for Each Metric
|
66 |
Based on each metric’s analysis, assign scores:
|
67 |
+
|
68 |
+
10 = Very Strong
|
69 |
+
8-9 = Strong
|
70 |
+
6-7 = Above Average
|
71 |
+
4-5 = Average
|
72 |
+
2-3 = Below Average
|
73 |
1 = Very Weak
|
74 |
Step 2: Weighted Category Score Calculation
|
75 |
+
Apply weights to each category:
|
|
|
76 |
|
77 |
Profitability: 25%
|
78 |
Liquidity: 20%
|
|
|
83 |
|
84 |
Category Score
|
85 |
=
|
86 |
+
(
|
87 |
+
Category Rating
|
88 |
+
)
|
89 |
×
|
90 |
Weight
|
91 |
Category Score=(Category Rating)×Weight
|
92 |
Step 3: Aggregate for Final Score
|
|
|
93 |
Sum up the weighted scores to derive a total score out of 10.
|
|
|
94 |
|
95 |
+
Step 4: Determine Health Check Tier
|
96 |
Score 9-10: “Excellent Health” (Low risk, high profitability)
|
97 |
Score 7-8: “Good Health” (Generally strong but minor areas to improve)
|
98 |
Score 5-6: “Moderate Health” (Mixed performance; moderate risk)
|
|
|
108 |
Moderate growth,
|
109 |
The model might assign:
|
110 |
|
111 |
+
Liquidity = 7, Profitability = 9, Leverage = 4, Efficiency = 8, Growth = 6
|
112 |
+
Calculating weighted scores:
|
113 |
|
114 |
+
Liquidity Score =
|
115 |
+
7
|
116 |
+
×
|
117 |
+
0.2
|
118 |
+
=
|
119 |
+
1.4
|
120 |
+
7×0.2=1.4
|
121 |
+
Profitability Score =
|
122 |
+
9
|
123 |
+
×
|
124 |
+
0.25
|
125 |
+
=
|
126 |
+
2.25
|
127 |
+
9×0.25=2.25
|
128 |
+
Leverage Score =
|
129 |
+
4
|
130 |
+
×
|
131 |
+
0.2
|
132 |
+
=
|
133 |
+
0.8
|
134 |
+
4×0.2=0.8
|
135 |
+
Efficiency Score =
|
136 |
+
8
|
137 |
+
×
|
138 |
+
0.15
|
139 |
+
=
|
140 |
+
1.2
|
141 |
+
8×0.15=1.2
|
142 |
+
Growth Score =
|
143 |
+
6
|
144 |
+
×
|
145 |
+
0.2
|
146 |
+
=
|
147 |
+
1.2
|
148 |
+
6×0.2=1.2
|
149 |
+
Total Health Check Score =
|
150 |
+
1.4
|
151 |
+
+
|
152 |
+
2.25
|
153 |
+
+
|
154 |
+
0.8
|
155 |
+
+
|
156 |
+
1.2
|
157 |
+
+
|
158 |
+
1.2
|
159 |
+
=
|
160 |
+
6.85
|
161 |
+
1.4+2.25+0.8+1.2+1.2=6.85
|
162 |
|
163 |
Output
|
164 |
+
you will return:
|
165 |
|
166 |
A QuantiNeuron Health Check Score on a 1-10 scale.
|
167 |
A Health Summary, outlining strengths and weaknesses based on metrics.
|
168 |
+
A Recommendation Statement, if necessary, for areas needing attention.
|
investmentvaluation.txt
ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|