Mungert/OpenThinker3-7B-GGUF

OpenThinker3-7B GGUF Models

Model Generation Details

This model was generated using llama.cpp at commit 745aa531.

Ultra-Low-Bit Quantization with IQ-DynamicGate (1-2 bit)

Our latest quantization method introduces precision-adaptive quantization for ultra-low-bit models (1-2 bit), with benchmark-proven improvements on Llama-3-8B. This approach uses layer-specific strategies to preserve accuracy while maintaining extreme memory efficiency.

Benchmark Context

All tests conducted on Llama-3-8B-Instruct using:

• Standard perplexity evaluation pipeline
• 2048-token context window
• Same prompt set across all quantizations

Method

• Dynamic Precision Allocation:
  • First/Last 25% of layers → IQ4_XS (selected layers)
  • Middle 50% → IQ2_XXS/IQ3_S (increase efficiency)
• Critical Component Protection:
  • Embeddings/output layers use Q5_K
  • Reduces error propagation by 38% vs standard 1-2bit

Quantization Performance Comparison (Llama-3-8B)

Quantization	Standard PPL	DynamicGate PPL	Δ PPL	Std Size	DG Size	Δ Size	Std Speed	DG Speed
IQ2_XXS	11.30	9.84	-12.9%	2.5G	2.6G	+0.1G	234s	246s
IQ2_XS	11.72	11.63	-0.8%	2.7G	2.8G	+0.1G	242s	246s
IQ2_S	14.31	9.02	-36.9%	2.7G	2.9G	+0.2G	238s	244s
IQ1_M	27.46	15.41	-43.9%	2.2G	2.5G	+0.3G	206s	212s
IQ1_S	53.07	32.00	-39.7%	2.1G	2.4G	+0.3G	184s	209s

Key:

• PPL = Perplexity (lower is better)
• Δ PPL = Percentage change from standard to DynamicGate
• Speed = Inference time (CPU avx2, 2048 token context)
• Size differences reflect mixed quantization overhead

Key Improvements:

• 🔥 IQ1_M shows massive 43.9% perplexity reduction (27.46 → 15.41)
• 🚀 IQ2_S cuts perplexity by 36.9% while adding only 0.2GB
• ⚡ IQ1_S maintains 39.7% better accuracy despite 1-bit quantization

Tradeoffs:

• All variants have modest size increases (0.1-0.3GB)
• Inference speeds remain comparable (<5% difference)

When to Use These Models

📌 Fitting models into GPU VRAM

✔ Memory-constrained deployments

✔ Cpu and Edge Devices where 1-2bit errors can be tolerated

✔ Research into ultra-low-bit quantization

Choosing the Right Model Format

Selecting the correct model format depends on your hardware capabilities and memory constraints.

BF16 (Brain Float 16) – Use if BF16 acceleration is available

• A 16-bit floating-point format designed for faster computation while retaining good precision.
• Provides similar dynamic range as FP32 but with lower memory usage.
• Recommended if your hardware supports BF16 acceleration (check your device's specs).
• Ideal for high-performance inference with reduced memory footprint compared to FP32.

📌 Use BF16 if:
✔ Your hardware has native BF16 support (e.g., newer GPUs, TPUs).
✔ You want higher precision while saving memory.
✔ You plan to requantize the model into another format.

📌 Avoid BF16 if:
❌ Your hardware does not support BF16 (it may fall back to FP32 and run slower).
❌ You need compatibility with older devices that lack BF16 optimization.

---

F16 (Float 16) – More widely supported than BF16

• A 16-bit floating-point high precision but with less of range of values than BF16.
• Works on most devices with FP16 acceleration support (including many GPUs and some CPUs).
• Slightly lower numerical precision than BF16 but generally sufficient for inference.

📌 Use F16 if:
✔ Your hardware supports FP16 but not BF16.
✔ You need a balance between speed, memory usage, and accuracy.
✔ You are running on a GPU or another device optimized for FP16 computations.

📌 Avoid F16 if:
❌ Your device lacks native FP16 support (it may run slower than expected).
❌ You have memory limitations.

---

Quantized Models (Q4_K, Q6_K, Q8, etc.) – For CPU & Low-VRAM Inference

Quantization reduces model size and memory usage while maintaining as much accuracy as possible.

• Lower-bit models (Q4_K) → Best for minimal memory usage, may have lower precision.
• Higher-bit models (Q6_K, Q8_0) → Better accuracy, requires more memory.

📌 Use Quantized Models if:
✔ You are running inference on a CPU and need an optimized model.
✔ Your device has low VRAM and cannot load full-precision models.
✔ You want to reduce memory footprint while keeping reasonable accuracy.

📌 Avoid Quantized Models if:
❌ You need maximum accuracy (full-precision models are better for this).
❌ Your hardware has enough VRAM for higher-precision formats (BF16/F16).

---

Very Low-Bit Quantization (IQ3_XS, IQ3_S, IQ3_M, Q4_K, Q4_0)

These models are optimized for extreme memory efficiency, making them ideal for low-power devices or large-scale deployments where memory is a critical constraint.

• IQ3_XS: Ultra-low-bit quantization (3-bit) with extreme memory efficiency.

  • Use case: Best for ultra-low-memory devices where even Q4_K is too large.
  • Trade-off: Lower accuracy compared to higher-bit quantizations.

• IQ3_S: Small block size for maximum memory efficiency.

  • Use case: Best for low-memory devices where IQ3_XS is too aggressive.

• IQ3_M: Medium block size for better accuracy than IQ3_S.

  • Use case: Suitable for low-memory devices where IQ3_S is too limiting.

• Q4_K: 4-bit quantization with block-wise optimization for better accuracy.

  • Use case: Best for low-memory devices where Q6_K is too large.

• Q4_0: Pure 4-bit quantization, optimized for ARM devices.

  • Use case: Best for ARM-based devices or low-memory environments.

---

Summary Table: Model Format Selection

Model Format	Precision	Memory Usage	Device Requirements	Best Use Case
BF16	Highest	High	BF16-supported GPU/CPUs	High-speed inference with reduced memory
F16	High	High	FP16-supported devices	GPU inference when BF16 isn't available
Q4_K	Medium Low	Low	CPU or Low-VRAM devices	Best for memory-constrained environments
Q6_K	Medium	Moderate	CPU with more memory	Better accuracy while still being quantized
Q8_0	High	Moderate	CPU or GPU with enough VRAM	Best accuracy among quantized models
IQ3_XS	Very Low	Very Low	Ultra-low-memory devices	Extreme memory efficiency and low accuracy
Q4_0	Low	Low	ARM or low-memory devices	llama.cpp can optimize for ARM devices

---

🚀 If you find these models useful

❤ Please click "Like" if you find this useful!
Help me test my AI-Powered Network Monitor Assistant with quantum-ready security checks:
👉 Free Network Monitor

💬 How to test:
Choose an AI assistant type:

• TurboLLM (GPT-4o-mini)
• HugLLM (Hugginface Open-source)
• TestLLM (Experimental CPU-only)

What I’m Testing

I’m pushing the limits of small open-source models for AI network monitoring, specifically:

• Function calling against live network services
• How small can a model go while still handling:
  • Automated Nmap scans
  • Quantum-readiness checks
  • Network Monitoring tasks

🟡 TestLLM – Current experimental model (llama.cpp on 2 CPU threads):

• ✅ Zero-configuration setup
• ⏳ 30s load time (slow inference but no API costs)
• 🔧 Help wanted! If you’re into edge-device AI, let’s collaborate!

Other Assistants

🟢 TurboLLM – Uses gpt-4o-mini for:

• Create custom cmd processors to run .net code on Free Network Monitor Agents
• Real-time network diagnostics and monitoring
• Security Audits
• Penetration testing (Nmap/Metasploit)
• 🔑 Get more tokens by logging in or downloading our Free Network Monitor Agent with integrated AI Assistant

🔵 HugLLM – Latest Open-source models:

• 🌐 Runs on Hugging Face Inference API

💡 Example commands to you could test:

1. "Give me info on my websites SSL certificate"
2. "Check if my server is using quantum safe encyption for communication"
3. "Run a comprehensive security audit on my server"
4. '"Create a cmd processor to .. (what ever you want)" Note you need to install a Free Network Monitor Agent to run the .net code from. This is a very flexible and powerful feature. Use with caution!

Final Word

I fund the servers used to create these model files, run the Free Network Monitor service, and pay for inference from Novita and OpenAI—all out of my own pocket. All the code behind the model creation and the Free Network Monitor project is open source. Feel free to use whatever you find helpful.

If you appreciate the work, please consider buying me a coffee ☕. Your support helps cover service costs and allows me to raise token limits for everyone.

I'm also open to job opportunities or sponsorship.

Thank you! 😊

paper | dataset | model

We have released a paper for OpenThoughts! See our paper here.

OpenThinker3-7B

State-of-the-art open-data 7B reasoning model. 🚀

This model is a fine-tuned version of Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct on the OpenThoughts3-1.2M dataset. It represents a notable improvement over our previous models, OpenThinker-7B and OpenThinker2-7B, and it outperforms several other strong reasoning 7B models such as DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1, despite being trained only with SFT, without any RL.

This time, we also released a paper! See our paper and blog post for more details. OpenThinker3-32B to follow! 👀

Evaluation Results

The numbers reported in the table below are evaluated with our open-source tool Evalchemy. In the table below, we bold values in each column that are within 2 standard errors of the best.

Model	Data	AIME24	AIME25	AMC23	MATH500	HMMT O2/25	LCB 06/24-01/25	CodeElo	CodeForces	GPQA-D	JEEBench
OpenThinker-7B	✅	30.7	22.0	72.5	82.8	15.7	26.1	11.1	14.9	38.6	45.3
OpenThinker2-7B	✅	60.7	38.7	89.8	87.6	24.7	40.6	22.8	26.6	47.0	65.1
OpenThinker3-7B	✅	69.0	53.3	93.5	90.0	42.7	51.7	31.0	32.2	53.7	72.4
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B	❌	51.3	38.0	92.0	88.0	25.0	34.5	19.9	21.1	33.2	50.4
OpenR1-Distill-7B	✅	57.7	39.7	87.0	88.0	25.7	30.7	30.1	29.3	58.9	68.7
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1	✅	62.0	48.0	94.0	89.4	26.7	50.9	30.9	32.9	52.9	70.7
AceReason-Nemotron-7B	✅	71.0	50.7	93.8	89.8	33.3	44.3	32.9	30.9	52.9	64.3

Data

This model was trained on the OpenThoughts3-1.2M dataset.

The key to the strong model performance is our comprehensive data pipeline and over 1,000+ ablation experiments. This led to the creation of OpenThoughts3-1.2M, which consists of 850,000 math questions, 250,000 code questions, and 100,000 science questions. Reasoning traces are generated with QwQ-32B.

See the OpenThoughts3-1.2M dataset page or our paper for additional information.

Intended uses & limitations

Apache 2.0 License

Training procedure

We used 512 A100 nodes to train the model for 48 hours.

Training hyperparameters

The following hyperparameters were used during training:

• learning_rate: 8e-05
• seed: 42
• distributed_type: multi-GPU
• num_devices: 512
• gradient_accumulation_steps: 1
• total_train_batch_size: 512
• optimizer: Use OptimizerNames.ADAMW_TORCH with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments
• lr_scheduler_type: cosine
• lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.1
• num_epochs: 5.0
• weight_decay: 0.0

Framework versions

• Transformers 4.46.1
• Pytorch 2.3.0
• Datasets 3.1.0
• Tokenizers 0.20.3

More info can be found in our repository: https://github.com/open-thoughts/open-thoughts.

Links

• 📝 OpenThoughts Paper
• 📊 OpenThoughts3-1.2M and OpenThinker3-7B Blog Post
• 💻 Open Thoughts GitHub Repository
• 🧠 OpenThoughts3-1.2M dataset
• 🤖 OpenThinker3-7B model - this model.

Citation

@misc{guha2025openthoughtsdatarecipesreasoning,
  title={OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models}, 
  author={Etash Guha and Ryan Marten and Sedrick Keh and Negin Raoof and Georgios Smyrnis and Hritik Bansal and Marianna Nezhurina and Jean Mercat and Trung Vu and Zayne Sprague and Ashima Suvarna and Benjamin Feuer and Liangyu Chen and Zaid Khan and Eric Frankel and Sachin Grover and Caroline Choi and Niklas Muennighoff and Shiye Su and Wanjia Zhao and John Yang and Shreyas Pimpalgaonkar and Kartik Sharma and Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji and Yichuan Deng and Sarah Pratt and Vivek Ramanujan and Jon Saad-Falcon and Jeffrey Li and Achal Dave and Alon Albalak and Kushal Arora and Blake Wulfe and Chinmay Hegde and Greg Durrett and Sewoong Oh and Mohit Bansal and Saadia Gabriel and Aditya Grover and Kai-Wei Chang and Vaishaal Shankar and Aaron Gokaslan and Mike A. Merrill and Tatsunori Hashimoto and Yejin Choi and Jenia Jitsev and Reinhard Heckel and Maheswaran Sathiamoorthy and Alexandros G. Dimakis and Ludwig Schmidt},
  year={2025},
  eprint={2506.04178},
  archivePrefix={arXiv},
  primaryClass={cs.LG},
  url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04178}, 
}