Narsil/around
Viewer
•
Updated
•
37
•
29
Nicolas Patry
Narsil
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
updated
a dataset
4 days ago
Narsil/around
published
a dataset
5 days ago
Narsil/around
updated
a model
3 months ago
black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-dev
Organizations
Narsil's activity
updated
a
dataset
4 days ago
published
a
dataset
5 days ago
updated
a
model
3 months ago
Allow running conversion after closing a previous PR.
8
#21 opened over 1 year ago
by
rwightman
updated
a
model
4 months ago
reacted to
their
post with ❤️
4 months ago
Post
1587
Performance leap: TGI v3 is out. Processes 3x more tokens, 13x faster than vLLM on long prompts. Zero config !
3x more tokens.
By reducing our memory footprint, we’re able to ingest many more tokens and more dynamically than before. A single L4 (24GB) can handle 30k tokens on llama 3.1-8B, while vLLM gets barely 10k. A lot of work went into reducing the footprint of the runtime and its effect are best seen on smaller constrained environments.
13x faster
On long prompts (200k+ tokens) conversation replies take 27.5s in vLLM, while it takes only 2s in TGI. How so ? We keep the initial conversation around, so when a new reply comes in, we can answer almost instantly. The overhead of the lookup is ~5us. Thanks @Dani ël de Kok for the beast data structure.
Zero config
That’s it. Remove all the flags your are using and you’re likely to get the best performance. By evaluating the hardware and model, TGI carefully selects automatic values to give best performance. In production, we don’t have any flags anymore in our deployments. We kept all existing flags around, they may come in handy in niche scenarios.
Read more: https://huggingface.co/docs/text-generation-inference/conceptual/chunking
3x more tokens.
By reducing our memory footprint, we’re able to ingest many more tokens and more dynamically than before. A single L4 (24GB) can handle 30k tokens on llama 3.1-8B, while vLLM gets barely 10k. A lot of work went into reducing the footprint of the runtime and its effect are best seen on smaller constrained environments.
13x faster
On long prompts (200k+ tokens) conversation replies take 27.5s in vLLM, while it takes only 2s in TGI. How so ? We keep the initial conversation around, so when a new reply comes in, we can answer almost instantly. The overhead of the lookup is ~5us. Thanks @Dani ël de Kok for the beast data structure.
Zero config
That’s it. Remove all the flags your are using and you’re likely to get the best performance. By evaluating the hardware and model, TGI carefully selects automatic values to give best performance. In production, we don’t have any flags anymore in our deployments. We kept all existing flags around, they may come in handy in niche scenarios.
Read more: https://huggingface.co/docs/text-generation-inference/conceptual/chunking
posted
an
update
5 months ago
Post
1587
Performance leap: TGI v3 is out. Processes 3x more tokens, 13x faster than vLLM on long prompts. Zero config !
3x more tokens.
By reducing our memory footprint, we’re able to ingest many more tokens and more dynamically than before. A single L4 (24GB) can handle 30k tokens on llama 3.1-8B, while vLLM gets barely 10k. A lot of work went into reducing the footprint of the runtime and its effect are best seen on smaller constrained environments.
13x faster
On long prompts (200k+ tokens) conversation replies take 27.5s in vLLM, while it takes only 2s in TGI. How so ? We keep the initial conversation around, so when a new reply comes in, we can answer almost instantly. The overhead of the lookup is ~5us. Thanks @Dani ël de Kok for the beast data structure.
Zero config
That’s it. Remove all the flags your are using and you’re likely to get the best performance. By evaluating the hardware and model, TGI carefully selects automatic values to give best performance. In production, we don’t have any flags anymore in our deployments. We kept all existing flags around, they may come in handy in niche scenarios.
Read more: https://huggingface.co/docs/text-generation-inference/conceptual/chunking
3x more tokens.
By reducing our memory footprint, we’re able to ingest many more tokens and more dynamically than before. A single L4 (24GB) can handle 30k tokens on llama 3.1-8B, while vLLM gets barely 10k. A lot of work went into reducing the footprint of the runtime and its effect are best seen on smaller constrained environments.
13x faster
On long prompts (200k+ tokens) conversation replies take 27.5s in vLLM, while it takes only 2s in TGI. How so ? We keep the initial conversation around, so when a new reply comes in, we can answer almost instantly. The overhead of the lookup is ~5us. Thanks @Dani ël de Kok for the beast data structure.
Zero config
That’s it. Remove all the flags your are using and you’re likely to get the best performance. By evaluating the hardware and model, TGI carefully selects automatic values to give best performance. In production, we don’t have any flags anymore in our deployments. We kept all existing flags around, they may come in handy in niche scenarios.
Read more: https://huggingface.co/docs/text-generation-inference/conceptual/chunking
Your feedback on HuggingChat
10
296
#1 opened about 2 years ago
by
victor
upvoted
a
paper
6 months ago
"Model mistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407 time out" in Inference APIs
4
#42 opened 10 months ago
by
mrfakename
reacted to
alex-abb's
post with 🔥
10 months ago
Post
4860
Hi everyone!
I'm Alex, I'm 16, I've been an internship at Hugging Face for a little over a week and I've already learned a lot about using and prompting LLM models. With @victor as tutor I've just finished a space that analyzes your feelings by prompting an LLM chat model. The aim is to extend it so that it can categorize hugging face posts.
alex-abb/LLM_Feeling_Analyzer
I'm Alex, I'm 16, I've been an internship at Hugging Face for a little over a week and I've already learned a lot about using and prompting LLM models. With @victor as tutor I've just finished a space that analyzes your feelings by prompting an LLM chat model. The aim is to extend it so that it can categorize hugging face posts.
alex-abb/LLM_Feeling_Analyzer
- 4 replies
upvoted
a
paper
10 months ago
reacted to
mitkox's
post with ❤️
11 months ago
Post
3444
I've made an on device AI comparison between open source, Apple Intelligence, and Microsoft Copilot+ PC. This OS and applications level integration will bring GenAI to everyone, be it consumers or businesses, over the next year.
Communities and BigTech hold divergent visions regarding the problems they aim to solve, ways to lock in users and enterprises, as well as their commercialization and GTM strategies.
I'm aware that this table has the potential to expand into an epic 30-page saga during an in-depth analysis, but hey, it's a beginning. Do you think I should throw in a few more comparisons? I'm all ears for your thoughts and critiques!
Make sure you own your AI. AI in the cloud is not aligned with you; it's aligned with the company that owns it
Communities and BigTech hold divergent visions regarding the problems they aim to solve, ways to lock in users and enterprises, as well as their commercialization and GTM strategies.
I'm aware that this table has the potential to expand into an epic 30-page saga during an in-depth analysis, but hey, it's a beginning. Do you think I should throw in a few more comparisons? I'm all ears for your thoughts and critiques!
Make sure you own your AI. AI in the cloud is not aligned with you; it's aligned with the company that owns it
- 1 reply
reacted to
dvilasuero's
post with 🔥🤗
11 months ago
Post
8259
Today is a huge day in Argilla’s history. We couldn’t be more excited to share this with the community: we’re joining Hugging Face!
We’re embracing a larger mission, becoming part of a brilliant and kind team and a shared vision about the future of AI.
Over the past year, we’ve been collaborating with Hugging Face on countless projects: launching partner of Docker Spaces, empowering the community to clean Alpaca translations into Spanish and other languages, launching argilla/notus-7b-v1 building on Zephyr’s learnings, the Data is Better Together initiative with hundreds of community contributors, or releasing argilla/OpenHermesPreferences, one of the largest open preference tuning datasets
After more than 2,000 Slack messages and over 60 people collaborating for over a year, it already felt like we were part of the same team, pushing in the same direction. After a week of the smoothest transition you can imagine, we’re now the same team.
To those of you who’ve been following us, this won’t be a huge surprise, but it will be a big deal in the coming months. This acquisition means we’ll double down on empowering the community to build and collaborate on high quality datasets, we’ll bring full support for multimodal datasets, and we’ll be in a better place to collaborate with the Open Source AI community. For enterprises, this means that the Enterprise Hub will unlock highly requested features like single sign-on and integration with Inference Endpoints.
As a founder, I am proud of the Argilla team. We're now part of something bigger and a larger team but with the same values, culture, and goals. Grateful to have shared this journey with my beloved co-founders Paco and Amélie.
Finally, huge thanks to the Chief Llama Officer @osanseviero for sparking this and being such a great partner during the acquisition process.
Would love to answer any questions you have so feel free to add them below!
We’re embracing a larger mission, becoming part of a brilliant and kind team and a shared vision about the future of AI.
Over the past year, we’ve been collaborating with Hugging Face on countless projects: launching partner of Docker Spaces, empowering the community to clean Alpaca translations into Spanish and other languages, launching argilla/notus-7b-v1 building on Zephyr’s learnings, the Data is Better Together initiative with hundreds of community contributors, or releasing argilla/OpenHermesPreferences, one of the largest open preference tuning datasets
After more than 2,000 Slack messages and over 60 people collaborating for over a year, it already felt like we were part of the same team, pushing in the same direction. After a week of the smoothest transition you can imagine, we’re now the same team.
To those of you who’ve been following us, this won’t be a huge surprise, but it will be a big deal in the coming months. This acquisition means we’ll double down on empowering the community to build and collaborate on high quality datasets, we’ll bring full support for multimodal datasets, and we’ll be in a better place to collaborate with the Open Source AI community. For enterprises, this means that the Enterprise Hub will unlock highly requested features like single sign-on and integration with Inference Endpoints.
As a founder, I am proud of the Argilla team. We're now part of something bigger and a larger team but with the same values, culture, and goals. Grateful to have shared this journey with my beloved co-founders Paco and Amélie.
Finally, huge thanks to the Chief Llama Officer @osanseviero for sparking this and being such a great partner during the acquisition process.
Would love to answer any questions you have so feel free to add them below!
- 28 replies
upvoted
an
article
11 months ago
Article
🧨 Diffusers welcomes Stable Diffusion 3
•
96
replied to
flashback29's
post
11 months ago
Are you sure you're using the appropriate token ?
Does it still happen ?
If it still persists, the error is really likely to come from the token being not the one you expect.
If it's really not that, we can double check things.
Adding a fast tokenizer
2
#10 opened 12 months ago
by
Narsil
Add fast tokenizer
#9 opened 12 months ago
by
Narsil
ValueError: Unsupported model type mlp_speculator using TGI server
2
#2 opened 12 months ago
by
rishabh-simpplr