Datasets:

BytedTsinghua-SIA
/

Enigmata-Eval

Modalities:

Text

Formats:

Size:

Libraries:

License:

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Dataset Viewer

Auto-converted to Parquet

Split (1)

train · 4.76k rows

prompt stringlengths 275 19.1k	reward_model stringlengths 898 44.3k	data_source stringclasses 36 values	ability stringclasses 1 value	extra_info stringlengths 24 49	answer stringlengths 1 2.76k	meta stringlengths 280 22.1k	task_type stringclasses 7 values	task_name stringclasses 36 values
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Elephantopus is a genus of perennial plants in the daisy family. Elephantopus is widespread over much of Africa, southern Asia, Australia, and the Americas. Several species of Elephantopus are native to the southeastern United States. Elephantopus scaber is a traditional medicine. conclusion: No Elephantopus is native to the southeastern United States. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nElephantopus is a genus of perennial plants in the daisy family.\\nElephantopus is widespread over much of Africa, southern Asia, Australia, and the Americas.\\nSeveral species of Elephantopus are native to the southeastern United States.\\nElephantopus scaber is a traditional medicine.\\n\\nconclusion: No Elephantopus is native to the southeastern United States.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"a5e85064ef95c7088e114785e34b215f\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nElephantopus is a genus of perennial plants in the daisy family.\\\\nElephantopus is widespread over much of Africa, southern Asia, Australia, and the Americas.\\\\nSeveral species of Elephantopus are native to the southeastern United States.\\\\nElephantopus scaber is a traditional medicine.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: No Elephantopus is native to the southeastern United States.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "a5e85064ef95c7088e114785e34b215f"}	False	{"id": "a5e85064ef95c7088e114785e34b215f", "question": "\npremises: \nElephantopus is a genus of perennial plants in the daisy family.\nElephantopus is widespread over much of Africa, southern Asia, Australia, and the Americas.\nSeveral species of Elephantopus are native to the southeastern United States.\nElephantopus scaber is a traditional medicine.\n\nconclusion: No Elephantopus is native to the southeastern United States.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: If entertainment is interesting, it will be popular. All popular things are well-known. conclusion: If entertainment is interesting, it will be well-known. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf entertainment is interesting, it will be popular.\\nAll popular things are well-known.\\n\\nconclusion: If entertainment is interesting, it will be well-known.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"30e3bda6c08641c57579350d2a8bc685\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf entertainment is interesting, it will be popular.\\\\nAll popular things are well-known.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If entertainment is interesting, it will be well-known.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "30e3bda6c08641c57579350d2a8bc685"}	True	{"id": "30e3bda6c08641c57579350d2a8bc685", "question": "\npremises: \nIf entertainment is interesting, it will be popular.\nAll popular things are well-known.\n\nconclusion: If entertainment is interesting, it will be well-known.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: All growth companies’ stocks are volatile. If the stock price is volatile, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund. Some companies’ stocks are growth companies’ stocks. All mature companies’ stocks are suitable for a retirement fund. KO is a mature company’s stock. conclusion: KO is a company stock and a growth company’s stock. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll growth companies\\u2019 stocks are volatile.\\nIf the stock price is volatile, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.\\nSome companies\\u2019 stocks are growth companies\\u2019 stocks.\\nAll mature companies\\u2019 stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.\\nKO is a mature company\\u2019s stock.\\n\\nconclusion: KO is a company stock and a growth company\\u2019s stock.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"313655eaa381fcb74fb203b82099563c\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll growth companies\\\\u2019 stocks are volatile.\\\\nIf the stock price is volatile, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.\\\\nSome companies\\\\u2019 stocks are growth companies\\\\u2019 stocks.\\\\nAll mature companies\\\\u2019 stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.\\\\nKO is a mature company\\\\u2019s stock.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: KO is a company stock and a growth company\\\\u2019s stock.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "313655eaa381fcb74fb203b82099563c"}	False	{"id": "313655eaa381fcb74fb203b82099563c", "question": "\npremises: \nAll growth companies\u2019 stocks are volatile.\nIf the stock price is volatile, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.\nSome companies\u2019 stocks are growth companies\u2019 stocks.\nAll mature companies\u2019 stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.\nKO is a mature company\u2019s stock.\n\nconclusion: KO is a company stock and a growth company\u2019s stock.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Dagfinn is a given name. Notable people with the given name include Dagfinn Aarskog, Dagfinn Bakke and Dagfinn Dahl. Dagfinn Aarskog is a Norwegian physician. Dagfinn Dahl is a Norwegian barrister. conclusion: Dagfinn Aarskog is a notable person. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nDagfinn is a given name.\\nNotable people with the given name include Dagfinn Aarskog, Dagfinn Bakke and Dagfinn Dahl. \\nDagfinn Aarskog is a Norwegian physician.\\nDagfinn Dahl is a Norwegian barrister.\\n\\nconclusion: Dagfinn Aarskog is a notable person.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"b3d82f3d766ae8e7dfa8e5840401296b\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nDagfinn is a given name.\\\\nNotable people with the given name include Dagfinn Aarskog, Dagfinn Bakke and Dagfinn Dahl. \\\\nDagfinn Aarskog is a Norwegian physician.\\\\nDagfinn Dahl is a Norwegian barrister.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Dagfinn Aarskog is a notable person.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "b3d82f3d766ae8e7dfa8e5840401296b"}	True	{"id": "b3d82f3d766ae8e7dfa8e5840401296b", "question": "\npremises: \nDagfinn is a given name.\nNotable people with the given name include Dagfinn Aarskog, Dagfinn Bakke and Dagfinn Dahl. \nDagfinn Aarskog is a Norwegian physician.\nDagfinn Dahl is a Norwegian barrister.\n\nconclusion: Dagfinn Aarskog is a notable person.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is in the genus bulbophyllum. All bulbophyllum are orchids. conclusion: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is not an orchid. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nBulbophyllum attenuatum is in the genus bulbophyllum.\\nAll bulbophyllum are orchids.\\n\\nconclusion: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is not an orchid.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"362eb1c4784d11b4aa6971609bb19248\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nBulbophyllum attenuatum is in the genus bulbophyllum.\\\\nAll bulbophyllum are orchids.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is not an orchid.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "362eb1c4784d11b4aa6971609bb19248"}	False	{"id": "362eb1c4784d11b4aa6971609bb19248", "question": "\npremises: \nBulbophyllum attenuatum is in the genus bulbophyllum.\nAll bulbophyllum are orchids.\n\nconclusion: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is not an orchid.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: All iPhones are electronic. Some phones are iPhones. conclusion: No phones are electronic. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll iPhones are electronic.\\nSome phones are iPhones.\\n\\nconclusion: No phones are electronic.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"674dd9e91bf3b76fca993ea145df57b4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll iPhones are electronic.\\\\nSome phones are iPhones.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: No phones are electronic.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "674dd9e91bf3b76fca993ea145df57b4"}	False	{"id": "674dd9e91bf3b76fca993ea145df57b4", "question": "\npremises: \nAll iPhones are electronic.\nSome phones are iPhones.\n\nconclusion: No phones are electronic.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Some basketball players are not American. All basketball players are tall. If someone is tall, they wear large shoes. If someone wears large shoes, they wear large-sized clothes. Yuri does not wear large-size clothes. conclusion: If Yuri does not wear large shoes, then Yuri is an American basketball player. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nSome basketball players are not American.\\nAll basketball players are tall.\\nIf someone is tall, they wear large shoes.\\nIf someone wears large shoes, they wear large-sized clothes.\\nYuri does not wear large-size clothes.\\n\\nconclusion: If Yuri does not wear large shoes, then Yuri is an American basketball player.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"de47f5bcc885843bce36f7c40f0d035f\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nSome basketball players are not American.\\\\nAll basketball players are tall.\\\\nIf someone is tall, they wear large shoes.\\\\nIf someone wears large shoes, they wear large-sized clothes.\\\\nYuri does not wear large-size clothes.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If Yuri does not wear large shoes, then Yuri is an American basketball player.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "de47f5bcc885843bce36f7c40f0d035f"}	False	{"id": "de47f5bcc885843bce36f7c40f0d035f", "question": "\npremises: \nSome basketball players are not American.\nAll basketball players are tall.\nIf someone is tall, they wear large shoes.\nIf someone wears large shoes, they wear large-sized clothes.\nYuri does not wear large-size clothes.\n\nconclusion: If Yuri does not wear large shoes, then Yuri is an American basketball player.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Miroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician. Miroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory. Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue. Fiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian. conclusion: Miroslav Fiedler was a French mathematician. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\n\\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler was a French mathematician.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"12c1c864bf3bab88e773d4c712c4c9e8\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\\\\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\\\\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\\\\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler was a French mathematician.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "12c1c864bf3bab88e773d4c712c4c9e8"}	Unknown	{"id": "12c1c864bf3bab88e773d4c712c4c9e8", "question": "\npremises: \nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\n\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler was a French mathematician.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: James Cocks was a British lawyer. James Cocks was a Whig politician who sat in the House of Commons. A British is a European. Any lawyer is familiar with laws. Some Whigs speak French. conclusion: James Cocks speaks French. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nJames Cocks was a British lawyer.\\nJames Cocks was a Whig politician who sat in the House of Commons.\\nA British is a European.\\nAny lawyer is familiar with laws.\\nSome Whigs speak French.\\n\\nconclusion: James Cocks speaks French.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"422a81a56d12a9d84ca0a6feced8af4c\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nJames Cocks was a British lawyer.\\\\nJames Cocks was a Whig politician who sat in the House of Commons.\\\\nA British is a European.\\\\nAny lawyer is familiar with laws.\\\\nSome Whigs speak French.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: James Cocks speaks French.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "422a81a56d12a9d84ca0a6feced8af4c"}	Unknown	{"id": "422a81a56d12a9d84ca0a6feced8af4c", "question": "\npremises: \nJames Cocks was a British lawyer.\nJames Cocks was a Whig politician who sat in the House of Commons.\nA British is a European.\nAny lawyer is familiar with laws.\nSome Whigs speak French.\n\nconclusion: James Cocks speaks French.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: A roundel is a rounded artillery fortification. A roundel is not higher than adjacent walls. Cannons can be deployed on artillery fortifications. Roundels are the oldest artillery fortifications. Battery towers are an artillery fortification. conclusion: Battery towers are higher than adjacent walls. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nA roundel is a rounded artillery fortification.\\nA roundel is not higher than adjacent walls. \\nCannons can be deployed on artillery fortifications. \\nRoundels are the oldest artillery fortifications.\\nBattery towers are an artillery fortification.\\n\\nconclusion: Battery towers are higher than adjacent walls.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"f7324084e588acaa0ca6f5cbd0e2cdc8\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nA roundel is a rounded artillery fortification.\\\\nA roundel is not higher than adjacent walls. \\\\nCannons can be deployed on artillery fortifications. \\\\nRoundels are the oldest artillery fortifications.\\\\nBattery towers are an artillery fortification.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Battery towers are higher than adjacent walls.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "f7324084e588acaa0ca6f5cbd0e2cdc8"}	Unknown	{"id": "f7324084e588acaa0ca6f5cbd0e2cdc8", "question": "\npremises: \nA roundel is a rounded artillery fortification.\nA roundel is not higher than adjacent walls. \nCannons can be deployed on artillery fortifications. \nRoundels are the oldest artillery fortifications.\nBattery towers are an artillery fortification.\n\nconclusion: Battery towers are higher than adjacent walls.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Cancer biology is finding genetic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells. Cancer researchers have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value. P values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect. conclusion: Cancer effect size is a metric that is preferred by the majority of cancer researchers. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nCancer biology is finding genetic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells. \\nCancer researchers have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value.\\nP values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect. \\n\\nconclusion: Cancer effect size is a metric that is preferred by the majority of cancer researchers.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"0714d75cbe578987e918d3a089482564\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nCancer biology is finding genetic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells. \\\\nCancer researchers have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value.\\\\nP values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Cancer effect size is a metric that is preferred by the majority of cancer researchers.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "0714d75cbe578987e918d3a089482564"}	Unknown	{"id": "0714d75cbe578987e918d3a089482564", "question": "\npremises: \nCancer biology is finding genetic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells. \nCancer researchers have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value.\nP values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect. \n\nconclusion: Cancer effect size is a metric that is preferred by the majority of cancer researchers.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: The installment sales method is the approach to recognize revenue under the US GAAP. In accrual accounting, revenues are recognized when they are realized. In cash accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received. The US GAAP is the accounting standard developed and used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Sally works for the US Securities and Exchange Commission. conclusion: The company Sally works for performs accrual accounting. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThe installment sales method is the approach to recognize revenue under the US GAAP.\\nIn accrual accounting, revenues are recognized when they are realized.\\nIn cash accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received.\\nThe US GAAP is the accounting standard developed and used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\\nSally works for the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\\n\\nconclusion: The company Sally works for performs accrual accounting.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"6c28099676b09c16751afbb5680b4b69\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThe installment sales method is the approach to recognize revenue under the US GAAP.\\\\nIn accrual accounting, revenues are recognized when they are realized.\\\\nIn cash accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received.\\\\nThe US GAAP is the accounting standard developed and used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\\\\nSally works for the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: The company Sally works for performs accrual accounting.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "6c28099676b09c16751afbb5680b4b69"}	Unknown	{"id": "6c28099676b09c16751afbb5680b4b69", "question": "\npremises: \nThe installment sales method is the approach to recognize revenue under the US GAAP.\nIn accrual accounting, revenues are recognized when they are realized.\nIn cash accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received.\nThe US GAAP is the accounting standard developed and used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\nSally works for the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\n\nconclusion: The company Sally works for performs accrual accounting.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: WeTab is a MeeGo-based tablet computer. There is a WeTab product. WeTab was announced by Neofonie. Neofonie is a German producer. Germans speak English or German. conclusion: There is a tablet computer that was announced by a German. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nWeTab is a MeeGo-based tablet computer.\\nThere is a WeTab product.\\nWeTab was announced by Neofonie.\\nNeofonie is a German producer.\\nGermans speak English or German.\\n\\nconclusion: There is a tablet computer that was announced by a German.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"7526933801f3e34f462e200185270f0e\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nWeTab is a MeeGo-based tablet computer.\\\\nThere is a WeTab product.\\\\nWeTab was announced by Neofonie.\\\\nNeofonie is a German producer.\\\\nGermans speak English or German.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: There is a tablet computer that was announced by a German.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "7526933801f3e34f462e200185270f0e"}	True	{"id": "7526933801f3e34f462e200185270f0e", "question": "\npremises: \nWeTab is a MeeGo-based tablet computer.\nThere is a WeTab product.\nWeTab was announced by Neofonie.\nNeofonie is a German producer.\nGermans speak English or German.\n\nconclusion: There is a tablet computer that was announced by a German.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: An Olympian is a person who trains for an Olympic sport and goes to the Olympics. Carlos Reyes trains for an Olympic sport. Carlos Reyes went to the Olympics. Carlos Reyes is a welterweight. Heavy weights are not welterweights. conclusion: Carlos Reyes won an Olympic medal. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAn Olympian is a person who trains for an Olympic sport and goes to the Olympics.\\nCarlos Reyes trains for an Olympic sport.\\nCarlos Reyes went to the Olympics.\\nCarlos Reyes is a welterweight.\\nHeavy weights are not welterweights.\\n\\nconclusion: Carlos Reyes won an Olympic medal.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"d4e56ad42a764b8cafba3cf349047ad9\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAn Olympian is a person who trains for an Olympic sport and goes to the Olympics.\\\\nCarlos Reyes trains for an Olympic sport.\\\\nCarlos Reyes went to the Olympics.\\\\nCarlos Reyes is a welterweight.\\\\nHeavy weights are not welterweights.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Carlos Reyes won an Olympic medal.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "d4e56ad42a764b8cafba3cf349047ad9"}	Unknown	{"id": "d4e56ad42a764b8cafba3cf349047ad9", "question": "\npremises: \nAn Olympian is a person who trains for an Olympic sport and goes to the Olympics.\nCarlos Reyes trains for an Olympic sport.\nCarlos Reyes went to the Olympics.\nCarlos Reyes is a welterweight.\nHeavy weights are not welterweights.\n\nconclusion: Carlos Reyes won an Olympic medal.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: All fruits sold in Boston are shipped from Columbia. Some fruits sold in New Haven are shipped from Mexico. No fruits shipped from Columbia are fruits sold in New York. Avocadoe are a kind of fruit sold in New York or New York. Avocadoe are either shipped from Columbia and sold in New Haven, or neither shipped from Columbia nor sold in New Haven. conclusion: Avocados are either sold in New Haven or sold in Boston Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll fruits sold in Boston are shipped from Columbia. \\nSome fruits sold in New Haven are shipped from Mexico.\\nNo fruits shipped from Columbia are fruits sold in New York. \\nAvocadoe are a kind of fruit sold in New York or New York. \\nAvocadoe are either shipped from Columbia and sold in New Haven, or neither shipped from Columbia nor sold in New Haven. \\n\\nconclusion: Avocados are either sold in New Haven or sold in Boston\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"55edf0cca6984a66431540f7bfa0e7f4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll fruits sold in Boston are shipped from Columbia. \\\\nSome fruits sold in New Haven are shipped from Mexico.\\\\nNo fruits shipped from Columbia are fruits sold in New York. \\\\nAvocadoe are a kind of fruit sold in New York or New York. \\\\nAvocadoe are either shipped from Columbia and sold in New Haven, or neither shipped from Columbia nor sold in New Haven. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Avocados are either sold in New Haven or sold in Boston\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "55edf0cca6984a66431540f7bfa0e7f4"}	False	{"id": "55edf0cca6984a66431540f7bfa0e7f4", "question": "\npremises: \nAll fruits sold in Boston are shipped from Columbia. \nSome fruits sold in New Haven are shipped from Mexico.\nNo fruits shipped from Columbia are fruits sold in New York. \nAvocadoe are a kind of fruit sold in New York or New York. \nAvocadoe are either shipped from Columbia and sold in New Haven, or neither shipped from Columbia nor sold in New Haven. \n\nconclusion: Avocados are either sold in New Haven or sold in Boston\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: [BG] There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter. All students who want to have a long vacation love summer the most. Emma's favorite season is summer. Mia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's. James wants to have a long vacation. conclusion: James's favorite season is summer. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\n[BG] There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.\\nAll students who want to have a long vacation love summer the most.\\nEmma's favorite season is summer.\\nMia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's. \\nJames wants to have a long vacation.\\n\\nconclusion: James's favorite season is summer.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"d56457f207f5560e893cf5860650813d\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\n[BG] There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.\\\\nAll students who want to have a long vacation love summer the most.\\\\nEmma's favorite season is summer.\\\\nMia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's. \\\\nJames wants to have a long vacation.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: James's favorite season is summer.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "d56457f207f5560e893cf5860650813d"}	True	{"id": "d56457f207f5560e893cf5860650813d", "question": "\npremises: \n[BG] There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.\nAll students who want to have a long vacation love summer the most.\nEmma's favorite season is summer.\nMia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's. \nJames wants to have a long vacation.\n\nconclusion: James's favorite season is summer.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: DI Ray is a police procedural television series. DI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi. DI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio. Maya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British. conclusion: DI Ray was created by a Brit. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\\n\\nconclusion: DI Ray was created by a Brit.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"6dd1fb5c866c4585ffa294f9518d3ffd\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\\\\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\\\\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\\\\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: DI Ray was created by a Brit.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "6dd1fb5c866c4585ffa294f9518d3ffd"}	True	{"id": "6dd1fb5c866c4585ffa294f9518d3ffd", "question": "\npremises: \nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\n\nconclusion: DI Ray was created by a Brit.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: All defenders are soccer players. No soccer players are professional basketball players. All centerbacks are defenders. All NBA players are professional basketball players. If Stephen Curry is not an NBA player, then Stephen Curry is not an NBA player or a soccer player. conclusion: Stephen Curry is not a centerback. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\nIf Stephen Curry is not an NBA player, then Stephen Curry is not an NBA player or a soccer player.\\n\\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is not a centerback.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"9388461f30094ef1f7182060c14cdf75\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\\\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\\\\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\\\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\\\nIf Stephen Curry is not an NBA player, then Stephen Curry is not an NBA player or a soccer player.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is not a centerback.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "9388461f30094ef1f7182060c14cdf75"}	True	{"id": "9388461f30094ef1f7182060c14cdf75", "question": "\npremises: \nAll defenders are soccer players.\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\nIf Stephen Curry is not an NBA player, then Stephen Curry is not an NBA player or a soccer player.\n\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is not a centerback.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Daniel is a software engineer and he works at Palantir Technologies. Daniel studied bioengineering during his undergraduate at Rice University. Daniel’s older sister works at Meta as a technical sourcer. Daniel’s dad and older sister both graduated from Stanford University. Daniel’s dad is a doctor practicing internal medicine at a veteran’s hospital in Minneapolis conclusion: Daniel and his sister grew up in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nDaniel is a software engineer and he works at Palantir Technologies.\\nDaniel studied bioengineering during his undergraduate at Rice University.\\nDaniel\\u2019s older sister works at Meta as a technical sourcer. \\nDaniel\\u2019s dad and older sister both graduated from Stanford University.\\nDaniel\\u2019s dad is a doctor practicing internal medicine at a veteran\\u2019s hospital in Minneapolis\\n\\nconclusion: Daniel and his sister grew up in Minneapolis, Minnesota.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"093af6e04d64d16bd76b65f710c40697\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nDaniel is a software engineer and he works at Palantir Technologies.\\\\nDaniel studied bioengineering during his undergraduate at Rice University.\\\\nDaniel\\\\u2019s older sister works at Meta as a technical sourcer. \\\\nDaniel\\\\u2019s dad and older sister both graduated from Stanford University.\\\\nDaniel\\\\u2019s dad is a doctor practicing internal medicine at a veteran\\\\u2019s hospital in Minneapolis\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Daniel and his sister grew up in Minneapolis, Minnesota.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "093af6e04d64d16bd76b65f710c40697"}	Unknown	{"id": "093af6e04d64d16bd76b65f710c40697", "question": "\npremises: \nDaniel is a software engineer and he works at Palantir Technologies.\nDaniel studied bioengineering during his undergraduate at Rice University.\nDaniel\u2019s older sister works at Meta as a technical sourcer. \nDaniel\u2019s dad and older sister both graduated from Stanford University.\nDaniel\u2019s dad is a doctor practicing internal medicine at a veteran\u2019s hospital in Minneapolis\n\nconclusion: Daniel and his sister grew up in Minneapolis, Minnesota.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: No low-scoring players are top players in the league. Basketball players are either top players in the league or successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers. All players who successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers are solid at shooting 2-pointers. No players who are solid at shooting 2-pointers are bad at mid-range shots. Candace is either a low-scoring player or successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers. conclusion: Candace is either a player who successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers or is bad at mid-range shots. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo low-scoring players are top players in the league.\\nBasketball players are either top players in the league or successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers.\\nAll players who successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers are solid at shooting 2-pointers.\\nNo players who are solid at shooting 2-pointers are bad at mid-range shots.\\nCandace is either a low-scoring player or successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers.\\n\\nconclusion: Candace is either a player who successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers or is bad at mid-range shots.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"a7546659a7bb579c69a7da17023f44e1\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo low-scoring players are top players in the league.\\\\nBasketball players are either top players in the league or successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers.\\\\nAll players who successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers are solid at shooting 2-pointers.\\\\nNo players who are solid at shooting 2-pointers are bad at mid-range shots.\\\\nCandace is either a low-scoring player or successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Candace is either a player who successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers or is bad at mid-range shots.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "a7546659a7bb579c69a7da17023f44e1"}	True	{"id": "a7546659a7bb579c69a7da17023f44e1", "question": "\npremises: \nNo low-scoring players are top players in the league.\nBasketball players are either top players in the league or successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers.\nAll players who successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers are solid at shooting 2-pointers.\nNo players who are solid at shooting 2-pointers are bad at mid-range shots.\nCandace is either a low-scoring player or successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers.\n\nconclusion: Candace is either a player who successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers or is bad at mid-range shots.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: All imaginative processes are produced in human brains. All science-fiction is from an imaginative process. Either science-fiction or fact. No facts are proven to be false. Dune is a science-fiction or proven to be false. conclusion: Dune is a fact. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll imaginative processes are produced in human brains.\\nAll science-fiction is from an imaginative process.\\nEither science-fiction or fact. \\nNo facts are proven to be false.\\nDune is a science-fiction or proven to be false.\\n\\nconclusion: Dune is a fact.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"ec78ac8f7998d832001b965d95b4039e\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll imaginative processes are produced in human brains.\\\\nAll science-fiction is from an imaginative process.\\\\nEither science-fiction or fact. \\\\nNo facts are proven to be false.\\\\nDune is a science-fiction or proven to be false.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Dune is a fact.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "ec78ac8f7998d832001b965d95b4039e"}	Unknown	{"id": "ec78ac8f7998d832001b965d95b4039e", "question": "\npremises: \nAll imaginative processes are produced in human brains.\nAll science-fiction is from an imaginative process.\nEither science-fiction or fact. \nNo facts are proven to be false.\nDune is a science-fiction or proven to be false.\n\nconclusion: Dune is a fact.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: No homework is fun. Some reading is homework. conclusion: Some reading is fun. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo homework is fun.\\nSome reading is homework.\\n\\nconclusion: Some reading is fun.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"142fa7b0f8e7d38e80ca43ccaaff6368\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo homework is fun.\\\\nSome reading is homework.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Some reading is fun.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "142fa7b0f8e7d38e80ca43ccaaff6368"}	Unknown	{"id": "142fa7b0f8e7d38e80ca43ccaaff6368", "question": "\npremises: \nNo homework is fun.\nSome reading is homework.\n\nconclusion: Some reading is fun.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: TS Leda was a good passenger and cargo vessel. TS Leda was the first Norweigian vessel that was built with stabilizers. Stabilizers are mechanical devices that are only on ships that have powerful steam turbine engines. To be a good passenger and cargo vessel, ships must be quiet and good at sea. Some ships that are quiet and good at sea have powerful steam turbine engines. conclusion: TS Leda was quiet and good at sea. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nTS Leda was a good passenger and cargo vessel.\\nTS Leda was the first Norweigian vessel that was built with stabilizers.\\nStabilizers are mechanical devices that are only on ships that have powerful steam turbine engines.\\n To be a good passenger and cargo vessel, ships must be quiet and good at sea.\\nSome ships that are quiet and good at sea have powerful steam turbine engines.\\n\\nconclusion: TS Leda was quiet and good at sea.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"61b6b958389aa89bfd3c9257b730403d\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nTS Leda was a good passenger and cargo vessel.\\\\nTS Leda was the first Norweigian vessel that was built with stabilizers.\\\\nStabilizers are mechanical devices that are only on ships that have powerful steam turbine engines.\\\\n To be a good passenger and cargo vessel, ships must be quiet and good at sea.\\\\nSome ships that are quiet and good at sea have powerful steam turbine engines.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: TS Leda was quiet and good at sea.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "61b6b958389aa89bfd3c9257b730403d"}	True	{"id": "61b6b958389aa89bfd3c9257b730403d", "question": "\npremises: \nTS Leda was a good passenger and cargo vessel.\nTS Leda was the first Norweigian vessel that was built with stabilizers.\nStabilizers are mechanical devices that are only on ships that have powerful steam turbine engines.\n To be a good passenger and cargo vessel, ships must be quiet and good at sea.\nSome ships that are quiet and good at sea have powerful steam turbine engines.\n\nconclusion: TS Leda was quiet and good at sea.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: The National Lobster Hatchery is a hatchery located in Padstow England. The National Lobster Hatchery is open to visitors. A hatchery is either for profit, or for conservation. If a hatchery is for conservation, it might release animals into the wild. The National Lobster Hatchery is not for profit. conclusion: All hatcheries are open to visitors. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is a hatchery located in Padstow England.\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is open to visitors.\\nA hatchery is either for profit, or for conservation.\\nIf a hatchery is for conservation, it might release animals into the wild.\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is not for profit.\\n\\nconclusion: All hatcheries are open to visitors.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"aa8dbb52b49b9fc3e5bb94df04e5e998\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is a hatchery located in Padstow England.\\\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is open to visitors.\\\\nA hatchery is either for profit, or for conservation.\\\\nIf a hatchery is for conservation, it might release animals into the wild.\\\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is not for profit.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: All hatcheries are open to visitors.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "aa8dbb52b49b9fc3e5bb94df04e5e998"}	Unknown	{"id": "aa8dbb52b49b9fc3e5bb94df04e5e998", "question": "\npremises: \nThe National Lobster Hatchery is a hatchery located in Padstow England.\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is open to visitors.\nA hatchery is either for profit, or for conservation.\nIf a hatchery is for conservation, it might release animals into the wild.\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is not for profit.\n\nconclusion: All hatcheries are open to visitors.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: No touring musicians are permanent members of an orchestra. Musicians are either permanent members of an orchestra or have a unique musical voice or style. All musicians who have a unique musical voice or style are interesting as individual performers. All musicians who are interesting as individual performers are capable of attracting large audiences. If Ryan is interesting as an individual performer and has a unique musical voice or style, then Ryan is either a touring soloist musician and capable of attracting large audiences, or neither a touring soloist musician nor capable of attracting large audiences. conclusion: Ryan is either a permanent member of an orchestra or a touring soloist musician. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo touring musicians are permanent members of an orchestra.\\nMusicians are either permanent members of an orchestra or have a unique musical voice or style.\\nAll musicians who have a unique musical voice or style are interesting as individual performers.\\nAll musicians who are interesting as individual performers are capable of attracting large audiences.\\nIf Ryan is interesting as an individual performer and has a unique musical voice or style, then Ryan is either a touring soloist musician and capable of attracting large audiences, or neither a touring soloist musician nor capable of attracting large audiences.\\n\\nconclusion: Ryan is either a permanent member of an orchestra or a touring soloist musician.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"4b8fde7333798a55252f411729b8c017\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo touring musicians are permanent members of an orchestra.\\\\nMusicians are either permanent members of an orchestra or have a unique musical voice or style.\\\\nAll musicians who have a unique musical voice or style are interesting as individual performers.\\\\nAll musicians who are interesting as individual performers are capable of attracting large audiences.\\\\nIf Ryan is interesting as an individual performer and has a unique musical voice or style, then Ryan is either a touring soloist musician and capable of attracting large audiences, or neither a touring soloist musician nor capable of attracting large audiences.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Ryan is either a permanent member of an orchestra or a touring soloist musician.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "4b8fde7333798a55252f411729b8c017"}	True	{"id": "4b8fde7333798a55252f411729b8c017", "question": "\npremises: \nNo touring musicians are permanent members of an orchestra.\nMusicians are either permanent members of an orchestra or have a unique musical voice or style.\nAll musicians who have a unique musical voice or style are interesting as individual performers.\nAll musicians who are interesting as individual performers are capable of attracting large audiences.\nIf Ryan is interesting as an individual performer and has a unique musical voice or style, then Ryan is either a touring soloist musician and capable of attracting large audiences, or neither a touring soloist musician nor capable of attracting large audiences.\n\nconclusion: Ryan is either a permanent member of an orchestra or a touring soloist musician.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: No soccer players are professional basketball players. All NBA players are professional basketball players. All defenders are soccer players. All centerback players are defenders. If Stephen Curry is an NBA player or a soccer player, then he is a professional basketball player. conclusion: Stephen Curry is an NBA player. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\nAll centerback players are defenders.\\nIf Stephen Curry is an NBA player or a soccer player, then he is a professional basketball player.\\n\\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is an NBA player.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"80bfd57d9f758f6b47e091f745cc2362\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\\\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\\\nAll centerback players are defenders.\\\\nIf Stephen Curry is an NBA player or a soccer player, then he is a professional basketball player.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is an NBA player.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "80bfd57d9f758f6b47e091f745cc2362"}	Unknown	{"id": "80bfd57d9f758f6b47e091f745cc2362", "question": "\npremises: \nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\nAll defenders are soccer players.\nAll centerback players are defenders.\nIf Stephen Curry is an NBA player or a soccer player, then he is a professional basketball player.\n\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is an NBA player.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Common utilities include water, electricity, gas, heating, sewer, trash, and recycling. Many apartment rents cover the cost of water and electricity. Susan lives in an apartment where the rent covers all utilities. The rent of the apartment where Ava lives does not cover any utility expenses. Noah lives in an apartment where the rent does not cover heating. conclusion: Susan does not need to pay the water bill. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nCommon utilities include water, electricity, gas, heating, sewer, trash, and recycling.\\nMany apartment rents cover the cost of water and electricity.\\nSusan lives in an apartment where the rent covers all utilities.\\nThe rent of the apartment where Ava lives does not cover any utility expenses.\\nNoah lives in an apartment where the rent does not cover heating.\\n\\nconclusion: Susan does not need to pay the water bill.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"c50b5f64c22ddf40aa4a8cd93152459b\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nCommon utilities include water, electricity, gas, heating, sewer, trash, and recycling.\\\\nMany apartment rents cover the cost of water and electricity.\\\\nSusan lives in an apartment where the rent covers all utilities.\\\\nThe rent of the apartment where Ava lives does not cover any utility expenses.\\\\nNoah lives in an apartment where the rent does not cover heating.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Susan does not need to pay the water bill.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "c50b5f64c22ddf40aa4a8cd93152459b"}	True	{"id": "c50b5f64c22ddf40aa4a8cd93152459b", "question": "\npremises: \nCommon utilities include water, electricity, gas, heating, sewer, trash, and recycling.\nMany apartment rents cover the cost of water and electricity.\nSusan lives in an apartment where the rent covers all utilities.\nThe rent of the apartment where Ava lives does not cover any utility expenses.\nNoah lives in an apartment where the rent does not cover heating.\n\nconclusion: Susan does not need to pay the water bill.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Miroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician. Miroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory. Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue. Fiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian. conclusion: Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\n\\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"e1e339c92fb9a406d167480bacdcd5f7\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\\\\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\\\\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\\\\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "e1e339c92fb9a406d167480bacdcd5f7"}	True	{"id": "e1e339c92fb9a406d167480bacdcd5f7", "question": "\npremises: \nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\n\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: No watch that is battery-powered is automatic. All digital watches are battery-powered. Some mechanical watches are automatic. All smart watches are digital. Moonwatch is not a digital watch or an automatic. conclusion: Moonwatch is a smartwatch and a mechanical watch. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo watch that is battery-powered is automatic.\\nAll digital watches are battery-powered.\\nSome mechanical watches are automatic.\\nAll smart watches are digital.\\nMoonwatch is not a digital watch or an automatic.\\n\\nconclusion: Moonwatch is a smartwatch and a mechanical watch.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"9bf48d3e11fec4a4df99907e48bd8852\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo watch that is battery-powered is automatic.\\\\nAll digital watches are battery-powered.\\\\nSome mechanical watches are automatic.\\\\nAll smart watches are digital.\\\\nMoonwatch is not a digital watch or an automatic.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Moonwatch is a smartwatch and a mechanical watch.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "9bf48d3e11fec4a4df99907e48bd8852"}	False	{"id": "9bf48d3e11fec4a4df99907e48bd8852", "question": "\npremises: \nNo watch that is battery-powered is automatic.\nAll digital watches are battery-powered.\nSome mechanical watches are automatic.\nAll smart watches are digital.\nMoonwatch is not a digital watch or an automatic.\n\nconclusion: Moonwatch is a smartwatch and a mechanical watch.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: If two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time. If two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out. Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time. Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time. conclusion: Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid needed to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\\n\\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid needed to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"a3907fbfcbd030ff4c61848540f3a983\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\\\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\\\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\\\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid needed to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "a3907fbfcbd030ff4c61848540f3a983"}	True	{"id": "a3907fbfcbd030ff4c61848540f3a983", "question": "\npremises: \nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\nReal Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\nReal Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\n\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid needed to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: If the game has sold more than 1 million copies, then it is on the Best Seller list. All Games developed by Paradox Development Studio sold more than 1 million copies. Some games published before 2010 support the Linux OS system. All games on the Best Seller list are popular among young people. FIFA22 neither supports the Linux OS system nor is it popular among young people. conclusion: FIFA21 is published before 2010 Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf the game has sold more than 1 million copies, then it is on the Best Seller list. \\nAll Games developed by Paradox Development Studio sold more than 1 million copies. \\nSome games published before 2010 support the Linux OS system. \\nAll games on the Best Seller list are popular among young people. \\nFIFA22 neither supports the Linux OS system nor is it popular among young people.\\n\\nconclusion: FIFA21 is published before 2010\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"72fad8dd65cc82b9ceefb010620dc155\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf the game has sold more than 1 million copies, then it is on the Best Seller list. \\\\nAll Games developed by Paradox Development Studio sold more than 1 million copies. \\\\nSome games published before 2010 support the Linux OS system. \\\\nAll games on the Best Seller list are popular among young people. \\\\nFIFA22 neither supports the Linux OS system nor is it popular among young people.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: FIFA21 is published before 2010\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "72fad8dd65cc82b9ceefb010620dc155"}	Unknown	{"id": "72fad8dd65cc82b9ceefb010620dc155", "question": "\npremises: \nIf the game has sold more than 1 million copies, then it is on the Best Seller list. \nAll Games developed by Paradox Development Studio sold more than 1 million copies. \nSome games published before 2010 support the Linux OS system. \nAll games on the Best Seller list are popular among young people. \nFIFA22 neither supports the Linux OS system nor is it popular among young people.\n\nconclusion: FIFA21 is published before 2010\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: People are either interested in puzzles or bad at chess. If a person is bad at chess, then they don't play a lot of chess. A person is either a planner or a creative person. Erica is someone who plays a lot of chess. If Erica is neither bad at chess nor creative, then Erica is either someone who plans and is creative, or someone who neither plans nor is creative. conclusion: If Erica either plays a lot of chess matches or is creative, then Erica is neither interested in puzzles nor a person who plays a lot of chess matches. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nPeople are either interested in puzzles or bad at chess.\\nIf a person is bad at chess, then they don't play a lot of chess.\\nA person is either a planner or a creative person.\\nErica is someone who plays a lot of chess.\\nIf Erica is neither bad at chess nor creative, then Erica is either someone who plans and is creative, or someone who neither plans nor is creative.\\n\\nconclusion: If Erica either plays a lot of chess matches or is creative, then Erica is neither interested in puzzles nor a person who plays a lot of chess matches.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"e7fb98699fcfec7a3534aab6fa835104\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nPeople are either interested in puzzles or bad at chess.\\\\nIf a person is bad at chess, then they don't play a lot of chess.\\\\nA person is either a planner or a creative person.\\\\nErica is someone who plays a lot of chess.\\\\nIf Erica is neither bad at chess nor creative, then Erica is either someone who plans and is creative, or someone who neither plans nor is creative.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If Erica either plays a lot of chess matches or is creative, then Erica is neither interested in puzzles nor a person who plays a lot of chess matches.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "e7fb98699fcfec7a3534aab6fa835104"}	True	{"id": "e7fb98699fcfec7a3534aab6fa835104", "question": "\npremises: \nPeople are either interested in puzzles or bad at chess.\nIf a person is bad at chess, then they don't play a lot of chess.\nA person is either a planner or a creative person.\nErica is someone who plays a lot of chess.\nIf Erica is neither bad at chess nor creative, then Erica is either someone who plans and is creative, or someone who neither plans nor is creative.\n\nconclusion: If Erica either plays a lot of chess matches or is creative, then Erica is neither interested in puzzles nor a person who plays a lot of chess matches.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: No professional basketball players are soccer players. All NBA players are professional basketball players. All defenders are soccer players. All centerbacks are defenders. Roger Federer is not an NBA player or a defender. conclusion: Roger Federer is not a centerback. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo professional basketball players are soccer players.\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\\nRoger Federer is not an NBA player or a defender.\\n\\nconclusion: Roger Federer is not a centerback.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"b70b0b84f2fc85ee9ec7545fbb035fbd\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo professional basketball players are soccer players.\\\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\\\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\\\\nRoger Federer is not an NBA player or a defender.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Roger Federer is not a centerback.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "b70b0b84f2fc85ee9ec7545fbb035fbd"}	True	{"id": "b70b0b84f2fc85ee9ec7545fbb035fbd", "question": "\npremises: \nNo professional basketball players are soccer players.\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\nAll defenders are soccer players.\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\nRoger Federer is not an NBA player or a defender.\n\nconclusion: Roger Federer is not a centerback.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: Badults is a British Sitcom series, starring members of Pappy's. Badults piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three. The Working title "The Secret Dude Society" was used for Badults. Andrew Collins was the script editor for Badults conclusion: No members of Pappy's have starred for a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nBadults is a British Sitcom series, starring members of Pappy's.\\nBadults piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.\\nThe Working title \\\"The Secret Dude Society\\\" was used for Badults.\\nAndrew Collins was the script editor for Badults\\n\\nconclusion: No members of Pappy's have starred for a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"fe809170948820cd8d7b8b374a6e60e6\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nBadults is a British Sitcom series, starring members of Pappy's.\\\\nBadults piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.\\\\nThe Working title \\\\\\\"The Secret Dude Society\\\\\\\" was used for Badults.\\\\nAndrew Collins was the script editor for Badults\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: No members of Pappy's have starred for a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "fe809170948820cd8d7b8b374a6e60e6"}	False	{"id": "fe809170948820cd8d7b8b374a6e60e6", "question": "\npremises: \nBadults is a British Sitcom series, starring members of Pappy's.\nBadults piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.\nThe Working title \"The Secret Dude Society\" was used for Badults.\nAndrew Collins was the script editor for Badults\n\nconclusion: No members of Pappy's have starred for a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: The Lumina APV is produced by Chevrolet. The Astro is a van produced by Chevrolet. Cars produced by Chevrolet are either cars or vans. conclusion: The Astro is a van. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThe Lumina APV is produced by Chevrolet. \\nThe Astro is a van produced by Chevrolet. \\nCars produced by Chevrolet are either cars or vans.\\n\\nconclusion: The Astro is a van.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"91132917dc2a20a42c1bdd1478f3dd48\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThe Lumina APV is produced by Chevrolet. \\\\nThe Astro is a van produced by Chevrolet. \\\\nCars produced by Chevrolet are either cars or vans.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: The Astro is a van.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "91132917dc2a20a42c1bdd1478f3dd48"}	True	{"id": "91132917dc2a20a42c1bdd1478f3dd48", "question": "\npremises: \nThe Lumina APV is produced by Chevrolet. \nThe Astro is a van produced by Chevrolet. \nCars produced by Chevrolet are either cars or vans.\n\nconclusion: The Astro is a van.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: All Republicans are anti-abortion. Either Republicans or Democrats. No Democrats are conservative. Either conservative or liberal. A U.S government official is either conservative or a Republican. conclusion: If a U.S government official is not anti-abortion and a Republican, then a U.S government official is neither anti-abortion nor a liberal. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll Republicans are anti-abortion.\\nEither Republicans or Democrats. \\nNo Democrats are conservative.\\nEither conservative or liberal. \\nA U.S government official is either conservative or a Republican.\\n\\nconclusion: If a U.S government official is not anti-abortion and a Republican, then a U.S government official is neither anti-abortion nor a liberal.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"da1470c708272591a5d50455b40798b4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll Republicans are anti-abortion.\\\\nEither Republicans or Democrats. \\\\nNo Democrats are conservative.\\\\nEither conservative or liberal. \\\\nA U.S government official is either conservative or a Republican.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If a U.S government official is not anti-abortion and a Republican, then a U.S government official is neither anti-abortion nor a liberal.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "da1470c708272591a5d50455b40798b4"}	True	{"id": "da1470c708272591a5d50455b40798b4", "question": "\npremises: \nAll Republicans are anti-abortion.\nEither Republicans or Democrats. \nNo Democrats are conservative.\nEither conservative or liberal. \nA U.S government official is either conservative or a Republican.\n\nconclusion: If a U.S government official is not anti-abortion and a Republican, then a U.S government official is neither anti-abortion nor a liberal.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided. ### Rules: 1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle. 2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises. 3. Evaluation Criteria: - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises. - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information. ### Answer Format: - Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows: ``` <result> ``` - Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown". Here is the puzzle: premises: One American screenwriter and producer is Maggie Friedman. Maggie Friedman was the showrunner and executive producer of the lifetime television series Witches of East End. Witches of East End is a fantasy-drama series. Maggie Friedman produced and developed Eastwick. Eastwick is a series by ABC. conclusion: There isn't a series by ABC that was developed by the showrunner of Witches of East End. Note: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.	{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. Premises: You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. Conclusion: A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. Evaluation Criteria:\\n - True: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - False: The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - Unknown: The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nOne American screenwriter and producer is Maggie Friedman.\\nMaggie Friedman was the showrunner and executive producer of the lifetime television series Witches of East End.\\nWitches of East End is a fantasy-drama series.\\nMaggie Friedman produced and developed Eastwick.\\nEastwick is a series by ABC.\\n\\nconclusion: There isn't a series by ABC that was developed by the showrunner of Witches of East End.\\n \\n\\nNote: Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"55c8650ef8484015291f67d85099c756\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nOne American screenwriter and producer is Maggie Friedman.\\\\nMaggie Friedman was the showrunner and executive producer of the lifetime television series Witches of East End.\\\\nWitches of East End is a fantasy-drama series.\\\\nMaggie Friedman produced and developed Eastwick.\\\\nEastwick is a series by ABC.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: There isn't a series by ABC that was developed by the showrunner of Witches of East End.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}	PUZZLE##FOLIO	PUZZLE	{"index": "55c8650ef8484015291f67d85099c756"}	False	{"id": "55c8650ef8484015291f67d85099c756", "question": "\npremises: \nOne American screenwriter and producer is Maggie Friedman.\nMaggie Friedman was the showrunner and executive producer of the lifetime television series Witches of East End.\nWitches of East End is a fantasy-drama series.\nMaggie Friedman produced and developed Eastwick.\nEastwick is a series by ABC.\n\nconclusion: There isn't a series by ABC that was developed by the showrunner of Witches of East End.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}	logic	FOLIO

End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

README.md exists but content is empty.

Downloads last month: 686

Size of downloaded dataset files:

6.46 MB

Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:

6.46 MB

Number of rows:

4,758

Collection including BytedTsinghua-SIA/Enigmata-Eval

Enigmata

Collection

Resources for the Enigmata Project: https://seed-enigmata.github.io. • 4 items • Updated 17 days ago • 2