prompt
stringlengths 497
14.4k
| chosen
int64 0
1
| rejected
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"feast of all saints. where. when. was the feast of all saints storyline and theme edited out. what a waste of a wonderful title. there is never anything in the story that has the remotest connection to the feast of all saints. nor is there anything in the story about all souls day which the term is referencing. why bother to use this title if you never intend to including any kind of storyline or theme about all souls day or the feast of all saints. embarrassly bad script and amateur writing how did they attract such great talent to this clunker. the writing is so amateur characters that have known each other all their life go into big long speeches about their life history for the sake of the audience. not at all the way people talk to each other. what was the director thinking. the directing is equally bad. the forced and overly deliberate style feels amateurish. in one scene and a character is yelling take your hands off of me and no one is touching him. the most badly directed scene however and is the incredibly over the top battle scene at the beginning of the film. excessive gore in a very fake and silly battle scenethere are so many dead people in the most fake battle scene. it looks like a saturday night live skit. you can see extras waiting for their cues to walk across camera. everyone plays their death scene like 4th grade boys exaggerating every little gasp and twitch. the blood on battle victims is so excessive and carelessly applied it looks like someone used a ketchup dispenser and just squirted straight lines of red on the costumes. this whole battle scene comes off as the spoof of a really cheesy war movie. you almost expect someone like will ferrell and mike myers to ride up on a horse and deliver the punchline. who in real life would ever behave this way. the most ridiculous bit of writing and directing and casting is actually the focus of the scene represent a little girl is standing under the dead body of her hanging father who is terribly mutilated and and literally dripping blood form his gaping wounds. even a totally idiot would know he is dead. yet she is very monotonously repeating over and over daddy and daddy. while looking at someone off screen. she delivered it with about as much believability and passion as you could expect from an non actor kid that had been repeating the line for the cameras all day. even if the poor kid had any acting skills and the scene is completely unbelievable. the little girl do not even be in the middle of the battlefield after hours of carnage surrounded by hundreds of dead bodies and while she calmly stands there. natural instincts would had the kid screaming and terrified and running away from the bloody carnage. are we suppose to be horrified or laugh. one particularly goofy detail and that gives the scene an snl satire tone and is the father hanging and with a huge hook through his mouth and cheek. he looks like a fish on a hook. the unintentionally funny details and make the whole scene come across as fake and silly. in fantasy la la land and mothers and daughters are the same age. another funny detail and is that you see a central character the little girl mother at the end of the scene and in the next scene and that occurs 20 plus years later and she looks exactly the same. she is still young and beautiful and and now the same age as her daughter. i almost turned the movie off right there because the direction and writing were obviously awful but i tried to stick it out because i wanted to see the louisiana settings and i like all the actors. i do not know what these fine actors were thinking when they accepted these roles. who was the targeted audience. the excessive amount of blood and badly acted violence in the opening scene are weirdly out of place with the soap opera storytelling tone that follows. it is also a strange way to start a movie that and for the rest of the time and seems targeted to romance novel reading females. weird inconsistency in tone. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the story and the show were good and but it was really depressing and i hate depressing movies. richard is great. he really put on a top notch performance and and the girl who played his sister was really awesome and gorgeous. seriously and i thought she was carmen electra until i saw the imdb profile. i can not say anything bad about peter galleghar. he one of my favorite actors. i love anne rice. i am currently reading the vampire chronicles and but i am glad i saw the movie before reading the book. this is a little tooreal for me. i prefer lestat and louis witty little tiffs to the struggles of slaves. eartha kitt was so creepy and after her character did what she did the movie was ruined for me while i could barely stand to watch the rest of the show. (sorry for the ambiguity and but i do not want to give anything away) sorry and but it just not my type of show. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"there so little here of the fantastic anne rice book that what is here makes no sense. some of the characters intense and surprising characters do not make it to the screen at all and and those who do are watered down to the point that there no reason for their existence. where the relationship between christophe and marcel. where the continued affair between marcel and juliet. why does dolly rose appear at all and since her story never explained. where the rape and redemption of marie and whose greatest attribute (and downfall) is that she can pass for white and her marriage to richard. why does the film end with marcel beating at the hands of his father. we learn nothing of aglae beyond that she a bitch who hates her husband while why no backstory explaining this hatred. as for the performances and there not a one that better than mediocre and though that likely due to the lousy script. best of the lot is that of the actor playing richard but richard not on screen enough to salvage the film. worst is jasmine guy as dolly rose and though again and it comes down to the actress having nothing to do with what little she given to work with. all in all and this is just terrible. i thought it would be impossible for any anne rice book turned film to be worse than exit to eden and but feast of all saints makes that mess look like a critical hit. how is it that rice is such a slut she will allow her best works to become such junk on the screen. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a slick romanticizing of the sexual exploitation of neworleans black women by white men of power and privilege. ooh. does that whet your appetite. well and then and belly up to a vhs or dvd and gorge on this gratuitous trolling through a seamy segment of history. for good measure and it adapted from the book by celebrated hack anne rice. the directing is as cloying and melodramatic as the cheesy dialog. most of acting is amateurish. the production sole worthwhile note is that it employed practically a dozen black actors and all of whom have scarcely been in employed in today market (jasmine guy and ben vereen and pam grier and eartha kitt) and including some faces that have barely been seen at all (bianca lawson and rachel cuttrell). it also is and despite itself and a sterling showcase for nicole lyn. the pompous and ponderous james earl jones is on hand as well. so and is the late ossie davis and a minimal talent who owes his success to having been affiliated with the legendary negro ensemble company. this film should be rated t for tripe. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"college students and who are clearing out a condemned dormitory and are stalked by an elusive killer. the dorm that dripped blood (aka pranks) is a bit of a mixed bag for slasher fans. the movies production values are pretty low and the story for the most part is pretty routine and there even a creepy bum hanging around for a red herring. in fact much of the story build up is pretty forgettable and save for one or two brutal murders. but the movie is really made better by its surprisingly intense climax (in an atmospheric setting) and one fairly bold and unconventional conclusion. the cast is lackluster for the most part. stephen sachs is the best of the lot as he does a pretty nice turn in character. also look for a young daphne zuniga as an ill fated student. over all this is a pretty standard b slasher effort and but the finale is well worth savoring and for this viewer saved the movie from being a complete ho hum. out of . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"daphne zuniga is the only light that shines in this sleepy slasher and and the light fades quickly. if not her and than what other reason to watch this. five college kids are signed up to prepare an old dorm for its due date of demolition. problems are automatically occurring when a weird homeless man is soliciting and and the group are short a few people. then and a killer is on the loose. i honestly wanted to say i was going to enjoy this one. it had a fair set up and or maybe that was just daphne zuniga in it. the film is too slow and and almost as silent as a library. most of the acting is below average and and the point of view moments are so old news. acclaimed composer christopher young of such films as hellraiser and entrapment scored this and in a repetitive cue line that was better made for a tv movie. still and it seems higher than the movie deserves. so and other than young and zuniga and this one scrapes the bottom of the barrel. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"over christmas break and a group of college friends stay behind to help prepare the dorms to be torn down and replaced by apartment buildings. to make the work a bit more difficult and a murderous and chucks wearing psycho is wandering the halls of the dorm and preying on the group in various violent ways. registered as one of the 74 video nasties listed by the u. k. in the 1980s and the dorm that dripped blood had a good reputation built up for it prior to first viewing. the term video nasty strikes into mind some images of some great explicit gore and violence and sex and etc. represent all the things a horror fan dreams of. so and after hearing all of that info and i settled into pranks (alt. title) expecting a sleazy slasher experience. . . and that what it tried to be and but failed pretty much completely. visually and the film not great. the cinematography and gore (except for a couple scenes) and and overall direction all fail. it simply not enjoyable to watch. the unoriginal script is lacking and often throws in random things without any real reason (like the opening kill). there are some cool death scenes and including a pretty nice face melt (which can be seen on the poster) and but that about it for the positive. the acting is pretty bad and the story seems unimportant and the killer isn not cool or scary and and it suffers the one major error that any slasher flick should always avoid represent it a bit boring. overall and for a film done by a few ucla film students for $90 and 000 (which would be over double that today) and the dorm that dripped blood isn not a total mess. it has a couple good things and and is fairly watchable. . . but and as a slasher flick looking to be on the level of films like the house on sorority row and pieces. . . it just cannot compare. don not expect much and and you may at least be entertained. i hate to say it and but this is one of the few films i have seen that would actually be better with a remake. . . and yet and they go after great works like black christmas. oh well. . . obligatory horror elements represent subgenre represent slasher violence or gore represent there are some brutally cool kills and and the gore is okay for the most part. . . but nothing special. also and they off screened some of the best murders. sex or nudity represent there a little unappealing (to me) nudity and but not very much. cool killer(s) represent nah. the ending monologue(s) of the killer made him or her pretty uncool. scares or suspense represent a jump scare or two and but nothing too effective. mystery represent i suppose and yeah and but i simply do not care enough and and it as obvious as the nose on the killer face. final verdict represent 3. 75/10. bah. humbug. ap3 . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am not looking for quality while i am just trying to get through the 74 famous video nasties that were banned in britain. this one was initially banned and re released in 2001 with a whole 10 seconds cut. some college kids spend their christmas vacation preparing a dorm for renovation. there are some creepy characters lurking about along with the four kids. which of them is the slasher. the actual killings are not very gory and so this video nastie is not really nasty. there is the requisite flashing of the boobies and but it has nothing to do with the college kids. i had a suspect very quickly and i turned out to be right. maybe i have seen too many of these. the end twist was clever while i have to give the writers credit for that bit of originality. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"probably one of the most boriest slasher movies ever and badly acted and badly written. the plot five students staying behind during the holidays closing down a dorm and but somebody has designs on them and starts killing them off one by one and the main suspect is the creepy groundskeeper john hemmitt played by woody roll and or could it be one of the five characters. acting not that bad not that great either apart from daphne zungia who dies way too quickly and should have been the main heroine and and the rest well quite dull although laura lapinski the main heroine sometimes has her charm and you do feel sorry for her in the end. the kills can not really see why they banned this and the kills look fake mostly and one guy has his hand sliced in half in the beginning which looks really fake and but the others are quite nasty like one girl gets her head run over by a car and one girl gets boiled alive and another gets burned alive. overall not really a great slasher could have been a lot better. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"an uninteresting addition to the stalk n slash cycle which dominated the horror genre in the 1980 . this was filmed as pranks but released as the dorm that dripped blood which is an obvious steal from the 1970 horror anthology the house that dripped blood. daphne zuniga is the only recognisable face in the cast and this was her first horror movie (she has also appeared in the initiation and the fly ii). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the two things are are good about this film are it two unknown celebrities. first and daphne zuniga and in her first appearance in a film and young and supple and with looks that still encompass her body today and steals the very beginning and which is all she is in and and that is that. she is obviously just starting out because her acting improved with her next projects. second and the score by then known composer christopher(chris) young is what keeps this stinker from getting a one star. yeah and i know one star more is not much and but in this movie case and it is a lot. the rest is just stupid senseless horror of a couple a college students who try to clean out a dorm that is due for being torn down and getting offed one by one by an unsuspecting killer and blah and blah and blah. we all know where this is going. watch the first eighteen minutes with daphne zuniga and then turn it off. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"eh and not a particular good slasher flick. so so acting and effects and decent yet familiar and uninventive soundtrack. there are three deaths in close succession near the beginning of the movie that make for a fairly good scene in which it would seem anything goes. apart from that and there a lot of characters wandering around and not realizing what going on and or chasing after red herrings while more killing of time and than of people. there are other deaths and and the killer is an equal opportunity murderer and not partial to any one implement. the killer also likes to set other people up to kill innocent people as well. the identity isn not revealed towards the end and and motive is pretty thin and and we really do not care. supposedly the movie takes place around christmas and but this isn not a major factor. one scene gets lit by christmas lights and that about it. the movie is rather dark with a muddy picture most of the time and at least on the videotape i watched. some of the dialog got a little lost in some of the opening scenes. the ending should have been stronger than it was. we think we realize what happened and although there a chance something else did. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i heard so much about this movie how it was a great slasher and one of those early 80 movies that die hard fans of most slasher movies just had to see. well and i rented it and i have to say that although it kept my attention as far as the suspense goes for most slasher films such as april fools day and friday 13th and prom night and this film could have been right up there with the above mentioned only it lacked true enthusiasm and potential from the characters as well as the on going story. characters that i found were unfortunate to be in this movie was the weirdo guy with the frizzy hair that kept creeping around the dorm and of course leading up to his true climatic role during the end with he faces the killer. another would be the dirty scruffy looking guy with the jean jacket and he could have played more roles in this movie that might have made the movie more interesting and instead and the movie played this guy as just another loser out there making unknown calls while he sleeps with his girlfriend and then drops his part and cuts him off until the end which was a waste and i was disappointed in his part in the end. as far as the true identity of the killer goes and when the identity was released as to who he was and i just laughed and but it was all to obvious and he really made a true jerk out of himself as well as an annoying character after his true intentions were revealed. this movie should be one to at least watch once for all slasher fans but do not spend your hard earned money on it in some rare hard to find collectors inventory. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"it the early 80s. there a group of suspiciously old looking teens. and there a maniac stalking around. yes and this is slasherville. this movie is called pranks. why is it called pranks. i haven not the faintest idea. unless your idea of a great prank is to repeatedly hit someone dinner with a baseball bat on balance and not a great prank while in fact quite a rubbish prank if truth be told. but there you go. the film itself concerns a group of teenagers who are tasked with cleaning out a decommissioned dormitory. they become aware that a psychopath is on the loose. to combat this development and they split up and wander about in the dark. it ends in tears for most of them. pranks is a badly made slasher movie. the dvd release i viewed was the vipco one. it appears to be cut of a fair bit of violence. this makes the dvd even more pointless because and let face it and a slasher movie shorn of violence is a waste of time. for slasher film and video nasty completists only. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"((nb represent spoiler warning and such as it is. ))first off and this is a teen slasher flick the spam in a cabin genre and as joe bob briggs piquantly put it. if youre looking for roshambo and this isn not it and wasn not going to be it. i am desperately unimpressed by stabs at its cinematography and directing or acting performances. secondly and this wasn not zuniga first horror flick and it was her first screen appearance period and cinema and tv and whatever. for what it is worth while neither is daphne zuniga susan sarandon or katherine hepburn. thirdly and you have to give even a lame slasher flick props. sure and it follows the deeply insulting formulaic message of its genre represent any young woman having or showing interest in sex is beef on the hoof and and the harvest time is now. except this one gives the chop to the sweet and virginal protagonist as well. now there is a mediocre teen death film that has the courage of its convictions. interesting that this was said ingenue only film role. another one hit wonder and except that term gives the lass too much credit. (then again and this film probably has one of the highest percentage of one movie actors in history. of the nineteen credited actors and a whopping thirteen never appeared in any other film. three appeared in one other movie by the same producers. only one other besides zuniga has as many as six screen credits. what was this and the has been and never were mutual aid society. )granted and i saw this a long time ago on late night cable when i was bored and never anticipate being that bored in my life again and but i see no reason to hunt down everyone involved and toss them in the incinerator with joanne. negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"one of a multitude of slashers that appeared in the early eighties and pranks is notable only for an early performance by daphne zuniga (the sure thing and the fly 2) while her character dies fairly early on and and the rest of the film is totally forgettable. during their christmas break and a group of students volunteer to clear a condemned college building of its furniture. a crazy killer and however and throws a spanner in the works by methodically bumping off the youngsters one by one in a variety of gruesome ways. exploiting every stalk n slash cliché in the book and director jeffrey obrow delivers a tedious and unexciting horror that had me praying for the characters to be killed and so that i could get on with watching something more worthwhile. the majority of the deaths (which and let face it and is why we generally watch this kind of film) are brief and not that gory while the only truly grisly imagery comes right at the end when the bodies of the victims are discovered by the remaining survivor (there is one notably bloody dismembered corpsethe film could have done with more). at the last minute and the film saves itself from the disgrace of receiving the lowest possible score from me by having a nice unexpectedly downbeat ending and but this really is one for slasher completists only. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this one probably does not fit in the bottom of the barrel of mediocre slasher movies but it surely a damn bad movie. the holiday premise made it kind of interesting but after the first scenes the movie demonstrates it poor production values and stupid plot. i mean and the sub genre was at the moment all about an unseen maniac slashing teens for no apparent reasons but this one took it too far. there is absolutely no coherence in the events or nothing else to add. the clichès are more than boring and the gore is minimal and and so does the mystery. this is a fairly mediocre slasher entry that shouldn not be hyped even if it has a video nastie label. i am truly disappointed by this overrated piece of trash. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"if you have ever seen an eighties slasher and there isn not much reason to see this one. originality often isn not one of slasher cinema strongpoints and and it something that this film is seriously lacking in. there really isn not much that can said about pranks and so i will make this quick. the film was one of the 74 films included on the dpp video nasty list and and that was my only reason for seeing it. the plot follows a bunch of kids that stay behind in a dorm at christmas time. as theyre in a slasher and someone decides to start picking them off and this leads to one of the dullest mysteries ever seen in a slasher movie. the fact that this movie was on the video nasty list is bizarre because and despite a few gory scenes and this film is hardly going to corrupt or deprave anyone and and gorier slashers than this (friday the 13th and for example) do not end up banned. but then again and there banned films that are much less gory than this one (the witch who came from the sea and for example). anyway and the conclusion of the movie is the best thing about it and as although the audience really couldn not care less who the assailant is by this point while it is rather well done. on the whole and this is a dreary and dismal slasher that even slasher fans will do well to miss. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"what the . is this . this must and without a doubt and be the biggest waste of film and settings and camera ever. i know you can not set your expectations for an 80 slasher high and but this is too stupid to be true. i baught this film for 0. 89$ and i still feel the urge to go claim my money back. can you imagine who hard it stinks . who is the violent killer in this film and what are his motivations. well actually and you couldn not possible care less. and why should you. the makers of this piece of garbage sure do not care. they do not try to create a tiny bit of tension. the director ( stephen carpenter i guess it much easier to find money with a name like that ) also made the kindred (1986) wich was rather enjoyable and recently he did soul survivors. complete crap as well and but at least that one had eliza dushku. this junk has the debut of daphne zuniga . ( who . ) yeah that right and the melrose place chick. her very memorable character dies about 15 min. after the opening credits. she the second person to die. the first victim dies directly in the first minute and but nobody seems to mention or miss him afterwards so who cares . the rest of the actors. they do not deserve the term actors actually and are completely uninteresting. youre hoping they die a quick and painful death. and not only their charactersmy humble opinion equals 0 or 10. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have always liked fred macmurray and andalthough her career was tragically cut shorti think carole lombard is fun to watch. pair these two major and attractive stars together and add top supporting players like jean dixon and anthony quinn and dorothy lamour and charles butterworth and give them a romantic script and team them with noted director mitchell leisen and you get
a mediocre movie experience. skid johnson (fred) and maggie (carole) meet cute during her visit to the panama canal and and spend the next few weeks falling in love. skid a great trumpeter and so he embarks on a musical career and which is predictably meteoric in both its rise and fall. during his climb to musical stardom and he neglects maggie and who later inspires him to start over after he hit rock bottom. ah and yes
it the true hollywood happy ending and which comes none too soon. stars and a director of this caliber should guarantee success and but this movie is so predictable and slow paced that it difficult to watch at times. the early scenes set in panama are so draggy that they seem to go on forever and and later an alcoholic skid just wanders endlessly in new york. fred and carole try their best and but the tired script and s l o w direction just do not give them a chance. even the final scene and in which maggie encourages skid to rise from the ashes of alcohol and disappointment and just doesn not ring true. this movie should be seen once to watch some early performances from stars macmurray and lombard. however and i guarantee that watching it will seem to take about 48 hours. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am a big fan of fred macmurray and carole lombard. and and in addition to them and charles butterworth (a very enjoyable supporting actor) was in this film and . so why do not i particularly enjoy it. well and despite a good cast and this is one of the poorest written and most clichéd a pictures i have ever seen. given the talent and money spent to make this film and it is shocking how slip shod the writing was. i knew the film would be tedious when time after time early in the film i found myself predicting exactly what would happen next and i was always right. and this isn not because i am some sort of movie savant and but was because almost no imagination or effort went into it. in fact and it seemed almost as if the film was just a long string of clichés all strung together. also and i found it a bit irritating that fred mistreated carole so bad throughout the film and yet and true to convention and she came running to him in the end. uggh. there is more suspense in a lassie film (will he bring people to rescue timmy or will the rope he is dangling from break. ). despite the very and very tired and clichéd script and there were a few positives about the film. it was pretty cool seeing fred look like a broken lush at the end of the film it was pretty believable and he looked like he hadn not eaten and shaved or slept in days. also and charles butterworth prattle did provide a few mildly humorous moments. but all this just wasn not enough to make this film look any different than a b movie. it a shame and . it could have been so much better. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"in what would be his first screenplay and based on his own short story turn about and william faulkner delivers a bizarre story of loyalty and sacrifice and and really strange relationships. the story originally was about only the tone and young and and cooper characters and but mgm needed to put joan crawford in another picture to fulfill her contract and and faulkner obliged by creating a female role. crawford insisted that her lines be written in the same clipped style as her co stars young and tone and leading to much unintentional hilarity as these three communicate in a telegraph like shorthand that sounds like a monty python sketch (wuthering heights performed in semaphore). seriously and the almost entirely pronoun less sentences make ernest hemingway read like henry james. the film also reflects some familiar faulkner themes and with an almost unnaturally close relationship between brother and sister (as may be found in his sanctuary and and elsewhere). when young proposes to crawford and in tone presence and in lieu of an engagement ring all three exchange their childhood engraved rings with one another. the closeness of tone and young is also noticeable and especially as they go off to their thelma and louise fate. frankly and it creepy. not as creepy to this new yorker and however and as the recurring theme of the massive cockroach and wellington and which crawford cheerfully catches (and which is shown gamboling over her hands i had to turn away. ) and young turns into a gladiator. blech. that being said and there are some nice performances. young is particularly engaging in a scene where he taken up in cooper fighter plane and and roscoe karns is delightful as cooper flying buddy. tone and despite his inability to express himself through realistic dialogue and has a nice moment and dashing away his own furtive tears over his buddy young fate. crawford and stripped of meaningful dialogue as well and mostly comes across as either wooden or melodramatic and which is quite a balancing act for one role. the battle scenes not surprisingly and for a howard hawks film are the most exciting part of the entire picture. but not enough. as far as i am concerned and this is 75 minutes of my life i am never going to get back. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"my wife and i thought that with this cast and director and the movie would have to be at least worth watching. we were wrong. in fact and we gave up on it after 45 minutes. the idea that crawford and young and tone are british but speak with american accents was and for me and impossible to get past hard to believe this is england when no one talks with a british accent. there is zero chemistry between crawford and anyone and and to echo a previous comment and the idea that cooper and crawford suddenly declare their love for one another without any reason is ludicrous. there is no reason to care about any of the characters and which is why we threw in the towel halfway through. i found it hard to believe that hawks directed this and as none of the actors spoke with the trademark hawksian rat a tat delivery. so save your time and and skip this one. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"couldn not believe it. clipped sentences. good grief. know what. all true. real people ever talk like this. don not think so. good girl. stout fellow. stiffen upper lip. only reason given movie 2 instead of 0 gary cooper such a dish. movie as a whole ridiculous unless you like watching endless biplane dogfights. seemed endless and anyway. think all franchot tone dialogue dubbed. when crawford and young make a special effort to sound british they come over as irish. handy tip we brits clip words and not sentences. and somehow we manage to draaaaaaaawl at the same time. but that only if we have been to a really good public (that private to you) school. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"lulu (louise brooks) works as a typist and is missing something in her life. she enters a miss france contest against the wishes of her boyfriend andre (georges charlia) and she wins. she sets off for the miss europe title leaving her boyfriend behind. she wins again but returns home to andre because he has asked her to. once back together and her life becomes mundane again so one night she writes a note to him and leaves to experience the fame that is waiting for her as miss europe. andre follows her. this film is a silent film with a piano music track all the way through. it is also sped up so everything seems fast. limited dialogue has been added on afterwards and it is very phony. the cast are alright bearing in mind that it is a silent film. the best part of the film comes at the end but the story goes on a little too long. after watching this and i am not really sure what the big deal was over the looks of louise brooks she has a terrible haircut that makes her face look fat. i do not need to watch it again. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"please note represent i see from the various posts that there was an original silent version and also a sound version of this same film. i saw the sound version and it was esthetically yicky. considering some indicate that the original version was longer and without crappy dubbing and my review must be read with this in mind. although i know that rene clair has a lovely reputation as a film maker and louise brooks has a bit of a cult following as well and this is in many ways a technically poorly made film. while hollywood had already pretty much switched to sound mode around 1929 and up through the early to almost the mid 30s and a lot of famous french films were essentially silent films with some dialog and sound effects very poorly slapped over top the film. the lip movements in many and and in particular this film and do not even come close to matching what is being said and this would explain why an american like ms. brooks could do a french film. this is just sloppy and i would have preferred they had just made a silent film and as a silent film this is would have been an average film with excellent camera work (at times) and some decent silent style acting. the problem i also found with the film was the overly simplistic plot. for a silent morality play circa 1920 and it would have been fine and but by 1930 standards the plot is a bit hoary (that means old not slutty). a lady wins a beauty contest and her macho fiancé can not handle it. she gives it all up and temporarily and but is lured back to the fancy life and this spells her end. a tad melodramatic and huh. and also a bit simplistic and underdeveloped. finally and the character of the fiancé friend(. ) i found very disturbing and unreal. he looked like harold lloyd and spent much of the movie being abused and picked on by the friend and everyone else. as he just took it throughout the movie and no resolution came about and his character seemed superfluous and the treatment he received mean spirited. were audiences supposed to laugh as he was abused. this seems to me that what is implied and i do not like it at all. there are far better french films of the era (le million and la femme du boulanger and fanny and regain and and others) as well as better silent films. i just can not understand this film high rating. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this review may contain some spoilers. just when you thought they do not make them so extremely bad anymore and along comes rae dawn chong as a space vixen and willie nelson as a native american witchdoctor. it even worse when you factor in that these two are the better aspects of `starlight and a film that should only be viewed for laughs. chong is an alien sent to earth to seek out the only remaining half breed and part man and part alien. apparently and the earth is in dire straits. something is wrong with the genetics of mankind and and in a few decades the world will be turned into a polluted wasteland. only by duplicating the dna of the half breed can the kindly alien race save the planet. don not ask me how that is and since the movie gives the impression that the world will be destroyed by pollution and which is caused by humans. you would think earth could only be saved by getting rid of the polluting creatures and not saving them. anyway and the half breed turns out to be billy wirth and a man living in a small southwestern town and is part native american from his mother line and despite the fact that his mother is a red headed caucasian and his grandfather is willie nelson. wasn not this the sort of malarkey that made the bombastic carmen electra bomb `the chosen one such a howler. chong arrives in her ship just as wirth nearly drowns after driving his motorcycle into a lake in a fit of recklessness being the result of just breaking up with his girlfriend. before you can say utter the word `hogwash and chong is revealing her secret to wirth and who isn not surprised for a moment and and spreading the word to wirth family. chong also makes pals with wirth mother and who seems to have lost a few of her marbles over the years. well and this is because wirth father was an alien that abandoned her. of course and he is the standard rogue alien that has conveniently picked this moment to come to earth for wirth so he can use wirth dna to make the people of earth his slaves. (huh. ) his laughable attempts to use his telepathic powers and capture wirth suck up most of the screen time and are the worst scenes in the movie. not only are they boring and but they are the scenes where you will be spotting the flubs the most. the ideas might be nice on paper and but they are handled here with the utmost of stupidity and particularly in the aforementioned scenes with the rogue alien. but the effects are the bane of the movie. the opening scene involves chong on her spaceship and communicating with her superior and someone who we do not see but that chong communicates with through a vat that emits pink light. they use no spoken words and but telepathy and so we are treated to subtitles. trouble is and both chong and her superior subtitles both look alike and and the director gives you no indication as to which of the two are actually peaking at any given moment and which makes the whole conversation nothing but gibberish. the spaceship is the worst effect to come out of hollywood this side of an ed wood film. now and i am usually lenient on effects when dealing with a low budgeted film such as this and but these effects really got to me. the most offensive was the most simple one represent a fake night sky. the stars in the sky are so phony they almost sound off a dial tone. most notably are the moments where chong tells someone she comes from pleiades and and we get a shot of the seven stars. thing is and the seven stars take up about half the night sky in the movie and but any stargazer knows that pleiades is a star cluster between the constellations perseus and taurus and and the cluster doesn not take up much room in the sky at all. these effects just get so lousy that your jaw will hang lower and lower with every passing moment. be careful and for it will go right through the floor during the finale when the effects have willie nelson turn into a human spotlight and . . . oh and it has to be seen to be believed. starlight and star bright while last star i see tonight while i wish i might and i wish i may while not have to watch any more of this trash today. zantara score represent negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i finally caught up to starlight last night on television and all i can say is. . . wow. it hard to know where to begin the incredibly hokey special effects (check out the laser beams shooting out of willie eyes. ) and the atrocious acting and the ponderous dialogue and the mismatched use of stock footage and or the air of earnest pretentiousness that infuses the entire production. this truly is a one of a kind experience and and we should all be thankful for that. i nominate jonathon kay as the true heir to ed wood. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this has an interesting and albeit somewhat fanciful sci fi plot and but it wasted with poor direction and shlocky special effects. rae dawn chong is appealing and despite the lack of a believable story and direction consistent with her talent. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"all i can really say is that i am glad that i was knitting socks while watching the movie and or i would be very angry for having wasted 2 hours of my life. the acting was terrible and the plot was even worse. there were some scenes that were meant to be serious that had my husband and i laughing out loud. i highly recommend this movie to people who like to do their own version of mst3k. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i shudder to think what people must have thought of environmentalists after viewing this piece of overbearing and preachy cinematic trash. larded with enough indian wannabe nuttery and space brother buffoonery to stock a new age shop and starlight makes anyone who gives a damn about the planet look like a feather wearing crystal fondling idiot. the plot. alien rae dawn chong arrives to guide a flute playing underwear model in a mystical quest to avert earth impending environmental collapse. but first they must defeat an evil alien who looks nothing so much like a refugee from a castro street bar. fortunately and they have got mystical grandpa willie nelson along to help (who looks faintly embarrassed by the proceedings and as well he ought to be) along with buckets of cheap f or x and reams of pointlessly swelling music. sure and the clunky script helps to obscure the film trite plot and staggering pace and but that just the tip of this melting movie iceberg. everyone concerned with this film should have their union cards revoked until they complete a real course in environmental science. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i wanted to see it because of two reasons. one and it was the remake of high sierra with bogart and two and the bogart part was played by jack palance and whom can play dramatic roles with some subtility and as in the big knife. but now i wonder why they decided to shoot this remake. the film follows the same plot as hig sierra while only here and the actors do not care and the director is lost in his thoughts and and who knows what the producer was thinking. jack palance is getting bored looking at shelley winters and shelley winters is asking herself what she doing in this film. i do not even want to compare her to ida lupino in the same role. and of course and they had to use the dog story again. they surely could have come up with some different ideas. perhaps the color makes it nice to see the same location where they shot high sierra and but that definitely doesn not add any quality to the film. it a waste of time if you have seen high sierra before. otherwise and why not see a pseudo film noir. as for me and i would rather die than see it one more time. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"city girl meg tilly receives a horrifying phone call from her mother and and understandably shaken and returns home to her family rural digs and only to be faced with a mystery represent why are all the homespun residents acting out in bizarre and unsettling ways. radiation thriller and with barely a nod to ecology and has small town residents going berserk and which (laughably) includes two women gazing at each other with desire in a public place and tim matheson receiving oral attention from a girl on an office bench. the picture is too silly for words and wasting tilly wistfulness and quiet intensity on trash while forcing itself into a corner it can not possibly hope to get out of. some of the cinematography by thomas del ruth is good (particularly a fire sequence set inside a garage) and though he is let down by the scrappy editing and a fairly bathetic finale. simplistic screenplay has nary a surprise nor a shred of originality up its sleeve. half from . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have been known to fall asleep during films and but this is usually due to a combination of things including and really tired and being warm and comfortable on the sette and having just eaten a lot. however on this occasion i fell asleep because the film was rubbish. the plot development was constant. constantly slow and boring. things seemed to happen and but with no explanation of what was causing them or why. i admit and i may have missed part of the film and but i watched the majority of it and everything just seemed to happen of its own accord without any real concern for anything else. i cant recommend this film at all. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
". let me count the ways. 1. a title only remake that pulls out every cliché in the slasher handbook. 2. a plot so predictable that it becomes quite pathetic. 3. a completely weak execution of all attempts at suspense or thrills. 4. a pg 13 rating that insures no gore and violence and or sex. 5. a villain that is not frightening or even mysterious. 6. a cast of characters that are so thinly written and stereotyped that we couldn not possibly care about them. 7. a lack of any effectively creepy atmosphere (much unlike the original prom night). 8. a script of dialog that beyond poor it mind numbing. 9. a series of cardboard performances (not sure whether to blame the actors or the lousy aforementioned script for that). 10. a completely inept teen targeted slasher remake that not brave enough to attempt to have an imagination or even to show a puddle of blood. it a no brainer horror fans and save your money. bomb out of . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"prom night is shot with the artistic eye someone gives while finely crafting a lifetime original film. you know the one. this october and lifetime takes a break from the courageous tale of a woman surviving (insert disease name here) to tell the somewhat creepy tale of a woman pursued by a stalker ex boyfriend. it dramatic
it sappy
it immensely dull. it does nothing to further a genre and tell an original story and or strive for any sort of newness. prom night shares this plight. watching the killer poke holes in his victims and we sit silently as they slump to the floor with not a drop of blood spilled. it occurred to me that this was the cleanest killer in movie history. our director is working with a fairly good looking killer so he is forced to pour on the camera angles to make him appear creepier. think about matthew mcconaughey coming at you with a knife. you would probably go
oh. good lookin guy is going to kill me. naaaa. not scary even for a second and so the director throws schaech into shadows and over the shoulder in the mirror. this mirror shot is repeated to the point of sickness as it practically becomes a fetish of the creator. you will get 15 jump scares in this film and 2 of which made my date jump (i might mention she is afraid of everything). i would also mention she decided to take a nap halfway through the film and at one point threatened to leave me. as if this film were not disjointed enough and it appears to be cut to shreds. i am not saying it looks like key points were left on the cutting room floor as the crew scrambled to salvage some semblance of a horror film while i am saying as the film moves from scene to scene and you often get a jarring jump. this is the kind of thing you would expect when a film catches fire and a projectionist is forced to splice ends together and cross his fingers and and hope for the best. the editor should be shot. with a plot you can pack into two sentences and one stray spray of blood and an emo killer and and the tension of a very special episode of silver spoons and were left with no reason to support horror this weekend
at least on the big screen. in fact and this is the sort of film that should be punished. is it really that hard to make a scary movie. was this crew even aware they were making a horror film. a complete waste of my time and yours. i bit the bullet to get you this review. don not let my sacrifice be in vain. dont go into the movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"poor acting and no script and no plot and no convincing killer and no suspense and no original setups and it uses the same closet or under the bed or person behind you in the mirror tactics over and over again making it repetitive and boring and and not in a foreshadowing way either and and the fact that nobody ever really gets killed (at least not on screen) and which in turn zaps any suspense it may invoke right out of it and makes everyone feel eve more cheated for spending money on their admission ticket. its a horror film w or o any horror lmao. the most you see is what looks like someone having taken a ketchup bottle and spraying it across a plastic sheet. you have to be a teen who was sitting there screaming in the theater and scaring yourself to have enjoyed this and or you were high or drunk at the time. honestly and i have a life and do not bother writing reviews that often unless i really really hated something and or enjoyed it tremendously. but this film is awful and i feel i have a duty of sorts to warn you not to give your money to hollywood and encourage this kind of filmaking ever again. it is one thing to rent a bad movie at blockbuster from the weinsteins and its another when you have to sit through it in a theater. also and in case you want some remake nostalgia and forget it. this is not a remake and nor is it a re imagining. it is not scary and nor engaging and nor is it satisfying enough to be funny like others on imdb have claimed. it is just stale and booooring. here is what you will take away from this film represent remembering the scar on brittany snow head that stands out more than the plot and the fact that jonathan schaech must be having some sexual affair with j. s. cardone of the forsaken to have gotten another role as a killer(because he is as frightening as my poodle and and too cute to kill just about anyone) and that for some reason (duh) everyone who goes back to the hotel suite never comes back. what kind of person would not get worried at the prom when they decide to announce the candidates for prom king and queen and the fiercely competitive girl just somehow doesn not show up. this is my warning to you. do not waste youre money like i did. the original sucks too but is more of a guilty pleasure for jamie lee curtis fans and though no way near as bad as this piece of crap (sorry to sound vulgar or rude and but once you see this and you will understand why i say what i say). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"prom night is about a girl named donna (brittany snow) who is being chased by a psycho killer trying to kill her at her prom night. and by doing so killing her family and friends and and her enemies. now before i begin let me say have you been tired of pg 13 horror movies that haven not been scary lately. are you tired of stupid girl dialog oh my god and talking about girlish things. and are you really tired of girls in relationships and then crying. and the last thing are you tired of the us remaking asian and japanese and and chinese films. that pretty much sums up prom night but i am still not done with the review. the only reason to see prom night is to crack a laugh at the kills. if not and do not see prom night. you never see the kills an only hear screaming and you see some blood on the wall. and by the way the deaths are repeating like 24/7. so not only aren not they scary but it obnoxious. by the time i met the cast i think i was ready to hurl. too much girl talk and too much guy talk and and lots of oh my gosh. it our prom. i understand it fun but seriously is it too much to ask not to concentrate. if i were to put prom night on the list of worst films of 2008 without seeing the other films i would be the first one too. i am not going to be surprised if it gets released on dvd for cheap and quick. seriously do not spend your money or the time for dull acting and cheap scares and and a night to die for when watching the film. 1 star out of 10. (p. s. if i could give the film zero stars i would). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am the guy who usually keeps opinions to himself and but i just got back from this movie and and felt i had to express my opinions. let me start by saying that i am a huge horror fan. but what makes a horror movie. i sure like to see even a tiny bit of a good script and character development. i know they often lack in horror movies and but prom night looked like it do not even put forth any effort in that department. next and we all love suspense. that on the edge of your seat suspense with unpredictable surprises. yeah and prom night had none of that. of course and we like a terrifying killer. prom night have that. nope and it has a pretty boy with a cute lil knife. and when all else fails. at least horror has its guilty pleasure to make it enjoyable like gore gore gore and and the occasional nude scene. yeah and well when you have a horror movie rated pg 13 like prom night and they leave that stuff out too. so with all of these elements missing and i ask. does this still count as a horror movie. nope. i would call it more of a comedy. people in my theater were laughing more at this then they were when i saw semi pro that was supposed to actually be a comedy (which also sucked and but thats another story. ). i think i am just going to have to give up on new horror. all the good horror movies of the good ol days have been remade into garbage so movie studios can make money. the people i went to see it with do not even know this was a remake. which made me mad. i wonder what will happen when there no more movies to remake. where will horror go next. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"so and prom night was supposed to be a horror and thriller movie. i am a big wuss and was scared to see this movie at the beginning and but upon seeing it and it is neither horror or thriller. i was basically making fun of the movie in my seat because it was so predictable. you could predict what was going to happen next. the young actors were alright at playing their characters and but i would have to say the killer was definitely at the top of the game acting wise. yes and i will give props for the plot because it was good and but it not thrilling or scary. there were almost zero jump in your seat scenes. so and do not waste ten dollars seeing it in theatres and wait til it comes to dvd. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"when i first saw the trailer for prom night and i have to admit and the trailer looked good and like this would be a fun horror movie. so my friend and i saw prom night last night and i have to say i must be growing up because this was such a ridicules film and not to mention i am so sick and tired of the typical horror slasher movies with the loud noises as an excuse to scare people. there was no tension and the characters and how was i supposed to care about them. they had no development what so ever and the killer. oh and my god and this was very possibly the most stupid serial killer that has ever existed and i know it a film and but why would a man who never(or at least we know of) killed any one before and kill a girl family and friends that he just obsessed over. i mean and was he going to kidnap her or was he going to kill her. i have no idea and because this film made no sense and is too predictable and insulting to true fans of horror. donna family was just brutally murdered by her teacher and who has become very obsessed over her and he was captured and put in jail. it been 3 years and she just now getting some peace in her life and she even going to her senior prom. but the killer has escaped and still has donna on his mind and he follows her to her prom which means bad news for her friends and and the hotel maid and and the bell boy and because it is such a good idea to kill the maid and bell boy so no one become suspicious enough to check to see where these employee are. donna is in big trouble because also this killer who is clearly human can apparently get into houses un noticed and can kill people so silently and just and wow. i am sorry and i really did want to love this movie and we haven not had a good slasher flick in a long time and but this was just a stupid movie that i was not impressed with. just the situations were unbelievable and the actors were obnoxious. i know that this was a pg 13 movie and but i just love how someone was brutally stabbed to death and they only have just a little blood on their clothes. not to mention no stab holes. i do not recommend this movie for anyone unless youre a teen and this movie was made for the teenagers and not adults and and not for those who know a real horror movie and no offense to those who did enjoy this film and but i do not understand how anyone could. negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i saw this trailer and thought to myself my god is this movie for real and who would want to see this movie and at the same time i thought that and my girl friend turned to me and said we have to go see this movie. enough said so i saw this about 5 minutes go and i tried to put on a brave face and enjoy the cheap scares but there weren not even any of those. it has to be one of the worst movies i have ever seen the director has no influence no perspective the same shots were used again and again he did not build up suspense the cast probably were simply told scream cry run fall. i would love to see the script as the first 40 mins was mostly annoying girly giggles and bad music and there was absolutely no character development. the plot is just. well there was no plot it was basically i know we will terrorize a high school group on their prom night with a stalker serial killer and that brilliant. hmmm the acting was what you expect in a australian soap opera hopeless and that main character the blondie god dam she annoyed me. her longest line must have been half a sentence and and every time she was on camera she was just pulling another rude facial expression. please listen to me if you have any taste in movies do not go see this and and if your like me and do not have a choice well then i wish you good luck and maybe smuggle in an ipod or magazine. can not believe this film got made. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"in bridgeport and the deranged high school teacher richard fenton (johnathon schaech) is obsessed by the teenager student donna keppel (brittany snow) while she witnesses him murder her family to stay with her and but richard is arrested and sent to prison for life. three years later and the traumatized donna is feeling better but is still under psychological treatment and taking pills. on her prom night and she goes with her boyfriend bobby (scott porter) and two couples of friends to the pacific grad hotel for the party. but the psychopath richard has escaped from prison and is lodged in the same floor in the hotel chasing donna and stabbing her friends and staff of the hotel that cross his path. the forgettable slash prom night is a collection of clichés with a total lack of originality. the stupid story is shallow and silly and with a bad acting of johnathon schaech in the role of an insane killer. the predictable screenplay is amazing since it is possible to foresee what is going to happen in the next scenes. my vote is three. title (brazil) represent a morte convida para dançar (the death invites to dance). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am not particularly fond of remakes and or to steal the modern jargon retellings and but this film truly peeved me off. the original prom night and while not in my humble estimation a masterpiece and still realized what it was. horror. there are some simple things to remember when making a horror film. suspense is crucial to maintaining the interest of the audience. sorry folks and but a white knuckle film this was not. the scares were cheap and and foreshadowed terribly. (a good example of scare which has been done to clichéd excess now and is the cat jumping out of the closet and followed soon there after but a now unexpected appearance by the villain of the film) this film couldn not successfully pull that off and so how could i expect it to fulfill any of the other conventions of horror film. there needs to be a likable hero or heroine. this film doesn not have one. the person i most identified with was the head detective. his calm demeanor and but level headed approach to the escape of a killer was what more films of this ilk should have. common sense approach to events that occur. (if youre running from an axe wielding psycho and you turn and sprint in the opposite direction. not jog and whilst looking back ever three seconds and gaging the killer progress and only to trip over every branch and inanimate object in your path. ) if you friend disappears and you do not go looking for them alone. and if you suspect foul play you tell someone and not investigate yourself. these clichés are tired and well overplayed. in the horror genre in general and and in this film in particular. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"imagine the scenario you are at the movie theater only because you are in washington for the weekend and it raining and youre finished with the museums. you think you might go see the sarah marshall movie as the trailer look so so and you do not have to engage your brain. it sold out. options. the bank job and in bruges and the leatherheads or prom night. you have seen the bank job (suprisingly decent heist movie that) and in bruges (again and pretty good) so youre down to two. you do not fancy watching clooney or the nice one from the office run around in 1930 football uniforms and so you go see prom night right. wrong. you take the $8. 50 and walk up to a stranger in the street and ask him to punch you in the face for $8. 50. it would be money better spent. it actually plays like more of a comedy than a horror or thriller or whatever it is supposed to be. if i was financing that movie and they showed me that as a final cut i do not know whether to laugh or cry. probably both. an insult to anyone intelligence. my roommate was laughing out loud most of the movie and as for the acting and they might as well have cast robots (or maybe dogs) in the roles and they would have been more realistic. the detective has to be possibly the worst actor i have ever seen (ben affleck and hayden christansan (i hate his acting so much i do not care how you spell his name) you are relieved on your title(s)) so in summary not good. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"and rent a good horror movie. it like the writer had never seen a horror movie before and do not realize every single thing he wrote was clichéd and hackneyed and has been parodied to perfection in movies like scream and scary movie. in between the scary bits is the most banal and boring dialog ever written. stupid were going to the prom junk. i wanted to claw my ears off. honestly and the hills has better dialog. there really was no need to make this movie. leading lady is uninteresting and i kept thinking her. really. guy is obsessed with her. really. all the characters act in stupid ways and including the police. (cover the place in teams of 2. front and back. not one sleepy cop sitting in his car with the window rolled down just waiting for his throat to be slashed. ) the serial killer just swans about murdering everyone he wants without the least bit of problem. no resistance from victims (or doors). nobody has any protection or the least idea of fighting back (or flipping the security lock on the hotel room door). the people are like mentally disabled sheep. by the by and if youre a gore fan and you will be disappointed too. all the killing is kept offscreen and is ahem tastefully done. (so boo hoo for you. ) none of the killings is the least bit interesting. most of the time they have already happened by the time we find out. the only cliché missing was the cat that always pops out in this kind of movies. oh kitty. you scared me. i thought you were the killer aiieeee. and then at the end when it time for the killer to die well and let just say it the easiest and most obvious choice. snore. the audience was jeering and talking back to the screen throughout. it was too dumb to believe and not really scary enough. don not encourage this kind of lazy film making. (oh and and by the way no crowning of a prom king or queen. no tiara. no bucket of blood. ) so save your money and rent carrie or friday the 13th or halloween or scream or scary movie (any of them) to get a good scare with some original twists. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"okay. so i just got back. before i start my review and let me tell you one thing represent i wanted to like this movie. i know i have been negative in the past and but i was hoping to be surprised and actually come out liking the film. i do not. it not just the fact that every horror cliché imaginable is in this. and it not just the fact that they make every little thing into a jump scare (walking into a baseball bat left on the floor. are you kidding me. ). it just wasn not scary. one thing i was surprised about represent there was more blood than i thought there was going to be. which isn not saying much. the film starts off with donna being dropped off by lisa mom at her house. she comes in. goes upstairs. camera pans to her father dead on the couch. spooky. she goes upstairs and where the aforementioned baseball bat scene happens. finds her brother on his bed and apparently dead (how could she tell. he do not have a spot of blood on him). killer comes in and donna hides under bed and mom dies. she runs outside screaming for help. killer behind her represent i did it for us. cut to therapy session. this confused a lot of people everyone was asking whether or not her family actually died or if she imagined it and she mentions how the nightmares have started coming back. filler dialogue ensues. they cut to the chase pretty quick. few scenes at the salon and they go to the hotel. of course the killer is already there (for some reason and he escaped 3 days ago but the police or family weren not informed until he already there). more filler ensues. i am not going to go on about what happens in the film and because i do not want to spoil it too much. if you want to know who dies and horror_fan made a post about it already. but on the subjects of deaths represent they weren not that exciting. people in the theatre actually laughed out loud (an experience i have never had before in a horror movie and not even in when a stranger calls) during several of them. one in particular represent the bus boy guy who gives the most hilarious cared face i have ever seen. the only death involving any blood was lisa and and that was pretty scarce. her throat is slashed and blood (if you can even call it that it was practically black) splatters on the curtain thing. the only other blood was on claire when we see her body. apparently and fenton decided to stab her a few times after he choked her to death. um and okay. the movie was one of the most clichéd i have ever seen. let see here. obligatory close mirror curtain boom. scene. check. twice and actually (you could tell they were struggling). mandatory backing up into killer. check. there also the backing up into lamp scene and but you have all seen that. oh and you say you want a birds flying away scare. well and you got it. (yes and they managed to incorporate one of those in here). and and of course and the we have security on all exits but he still escaped scene. shall i go on. i could. for anyone saying the characters weren not stupid and are you kidding me. oh and even though the massive alarm is ringing and literally saying please vacate the building and and 3 of my friends are missing and i am going to go upstairs to get my wrap. these characters were some of the most flawed and stupid characters ever. the only likable character lisa made one of the most stupid moves in the movie. oh and i just realized the psycho teacher is here. i must leave my strong boyfriend behind to run off by myself to warn her. oh and shoot and the elevator is being to slow. guess i will take the stairs and run off into the construction site. ugh. by the end of the film and they all deserved to die. the only death anyone felt any remorse for was donna boyfriend (i can not even remember his name is that bad. ) and and by that time and the audience was completely drained out of this scareless and clichéd film. there were some positives the acting was decent for the most part and and it was well shot. but that about it. i would give it a negative and and that being generous. just for the laughs (and believe me and the audience had a few) and and brittany snow. oh and and the reaction was bad. very bad. people were boo ing after the movie ended and buzz afterwards was very negative. expect bad legs for this one. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"good grief i can not even begin to describe how poor this film is. don not get me wrong and i wasn not expecting much to begin with. let face it and a pg 13 slasher flick is pre destined to be missing the ummm. slashing and so no one should be surprised by the lack of gore. but it was the level of incompetence and cliché on display in all the other aspects of this movie is what really blew me away. we have a protagonist who is quite simply so completely useless that you find yourself rooting for the bad guy. and here a turnup for the books. she never changes hence breaking the cardinal rule of basic screen writing character development. if you think by the end of this film the poor little girl is going to turn around and finally kick some arse then think again. on top of this and were handed possibly the least intriguing (and definitely the least scary) killer ever to grace the genre. i am not joking when i say that dora the explorer has scarier villains than this movie. finally and because all the potential for tension or gratuity is removed by the inept (and apparently thirteen year old) director and what could possibly be left to fill up 2 hours of screen time. closets and that what. lots and lots of closets represent big closets and small closets and mirrored closets and closets to narnia and so many damned closets you will not want to dress yourself for another year. in fact this movie should have just been called closet and and had a picture of a big scary coathanger on the dvd case. on the back it could have had a photograph of the audience falling asleep and a quote by roger and ebert something to the extent of represent what the f@. did we just waste our time watching. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this movie is a good example of the extreme lack of good writers and directors in hollywood. the fact that people were paid to make this piece of junk shows that there is a lack of original ideas and talent in the entertainment business. the idea that audiences paid to see this movie (and like an idiot i rented the film) is discouraging also. obsessed teacher (3 years prior) kills teenager family because he wants her. for no reason he kills the mother and father and brother. from the first five minutes you see the bad acting and direction. years later and obsessed teacher breaks out of prison. hmm usual bad writing no one in the town he terrorized knows until the last minute. obsessed teacher somehow becomes like a navy seal and can sneak around and sniff out people and with a knife is super killer. sure. now obsessed teacher kills hotel maid for no reason and knifes bellhop for the fun of it and and starts to hunt down the teenager friends. now there is the perfect way to get the girl to love you. obsessed teacher sneaks out of hotel again it is stupid and ever cop would know his face but he walks right by them. now he kills two cops outside teenager house and somehow sneaks into her bedroom and kills her boyfriend. there is not one single positive thing about this piece of garbage. if any other profession put out work of this low quality and they would be fired. yet these idiots are making hundreds of thousands of dollars for writing and directing this trash. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i wish i could give this movie a zero out of ten. before going to this movie the day after it came out and i came on imdb to check out the comments. a comment called the movie predictable and cheesy with terrible dialog. i never go by other people opinions and so i wasted seven dollars for this crap movie. it had to be one of the worst movies i have ever seen. the person who wrote the script should be pushed off a cliff. since when do scary movies have sappy scenes. i swear and i am amazed there weren not any group hug ^ ^ moments. i think i jumped. once. and that because i zoned out and thinking about my research paper for english. the clichéd and birds or cat popping out of nowhere thing when you thought something was gonna happen. and the characters were stupid. my friend and i almost died laughing when the alarm went off and the main character said and i have to get my mom shawl. you. idiot. screw the shawl. safety is just a few steps away and but no and my mom shawl (that do not match the dress by the way) is wayyyy more important than my health and safety. and to top it all off and they take her back to her house and knowing that the killer knew where she lived. god. my friend and i also predicted the entire movie. and not just the and i bet he hiding under the bed and moments. it was the and he stole the bellhop clothes and sneaked out of the hotel and it the detective coming down the hallway and not the killer. moments. movies should never be this predictable. disney movies aren not even this predictable. i am gonna complete my rant now by saying and this was a terrible movie. i am glad i went to see it in theaters so i do not buy it for $15. 00 and then hate it. it was just bad. it would have been better if only one thing would have happened. if and after being shot by the detective and the killer would have fallen down in the same position he got shot in. knife in hand and falling and stabbing the girl on his way down. oh and how lovely that would have been. don not waste your time or money. go see a good movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"prom night (2008)directed by represent nelson mccormickstarring represent brittany snow and scott porter and jessica stroup and and dana davisplot represent three years ago and donna (brittany snow) witnessed the death of her entire family at the hands of her teacher (jonathan schaech) who has a bit of a crush on her. now and she is preparing for her senior prom with her stupid annoying friends. once there and they start dying one by one because the killer escaped from prison and no one bothered to warn donna because apparently her prom is too important to interrupt. pros represent i got a few good laughs out of the film due to the terrible dialog and the dumb character moves. an example representeveryone decides not to tell donna that the man who is oddly obsessed with her (she doesn not seem that great) has escaped from prison. their reason represent they do not want to embarrass her in front of all her friends. lolcons represent let me start off by saying i am a huge slasher fan. usually i can have fun with even the bad ones. i even like some pg 13 horror films. tourist trap (1979) and one of my favorites and was originally rated pg. i also enjoy poltergeist (1982) and the grudge (2004). so the fact that this is a dumb slasher film that is rated pg 13 does not have anything to do with me not enjoying the movie. first of all and i had a big problem with the story. i like slasher films that do not even have stories. at least they can be entertaining. this is about a teacher who falls in love with his student and so he kills her entire family. a few years later and he tries to make it up to her by ruining her prom and killing all of her friends . then there were subplots that i doubt anyone cared about. claire (jessica stroup) is fighting with her boyfriend and she has cramps and and i couldn not care less. this should have been a lifetime feature and not a remake of prom night. and then . this is a slasher film with terrible death scenes. i do not even care that it not that gory and some of my favorite slashers (halloween and curtains and the original prom night) were not that gory but they still had effective murders. here and we have half the characters dying in the same hotel room off screen and a woman being stabbed several times with no stab wounds and and a closeup on a bad actor face as he screams in agony. i am sure that 10 year old girls were terrified and but not me. i also hated the characters. there was donna unrealistically sensitive boyfriend bobby (scott porter) and i can almost guarantee you will never meet a boyfriend that sensitive in your life and unless you are a gay male. then we had donna annoying friends claire (stroup) and lisa (dana davis) and and the token mean girl chrissy (brianne davis). if you thought the characters in death proof were annoying and try watching this movie. and do not get me started on ronnie (collins pennie) and the dj (jay phillips) who gave me flashbacks to usher performance in shes all that. add to all that predictable plot turns and a terrible soundtrack and a big lack of respect to the original material and and you have quite a stinker. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"note represent i couldn not force myself to actually write up a constructive review of prom night. it just can not be done. instead and i went through what i thought about while watching the movie. things that i thought about while watching prom night represent i am so tired of those dreams where these elaborate deaths will take place and only for the main character to wake up right before she bites it. of course and when i say elaborate deaths and i mean off screen throat slashes or stabs in the stomach. didn not the whole it just a dream thing get ruined by dallas. speaking of which and i wonder if a couple stabs in the gut will cause immediate death. the film is only ten minutes into and i can already count the horror clichés on two hands. not a good sign. even after just meeting the protagonist boyfriend and i am convinced he will die. anybody want to place bets. the killer in this movie is a teacher that is obsessed with the main character and donna. (by the way and does anybody think that donna is a horrible name for a main character in a horror film. ) he spends three years in a maximum security prison before breaking out and finds donna celebrating her high school prom. while there is no accounting for taste and i seriously wonder who would take all that time to stalk somebody as dull as donna. high schools allow proms to take place at hotels and doesn not keep track of the students. apparently students are perfectly able to buy a hotel room and go in and out as they please. i suppose if this plot point wasn not in place and the movie would be 90 minutes of people being bored out of their mind and randomly biting the dust whenever they go to the bathroom. i suppose the trade off for their excitement is my utter boredom with everything. i have already played count the pieces of chewed bubble gum under the seat and guess how much money i have in my wallet and i am only in the 20 minute mark. how else will i entertain myself. note to self represent don not forget milk and bread on the way home. dear screenwriter represent you have used up enough false scares to get through this movie and every other horror remake this year. the 1980 version of this film wasn not that good but compared to this remake it was like citizen kane and or at least the godfather. it had jamie lee curtis in one of her many post halloween horror flicks and it did have a little twist at the end. i miss jamie lee. i wish she would act more. apparently at prom there isn not much dancing going on. instead the girls get in fights with their boyfriends over where they plan to attend college. i hear all these colleges being brought up by name and and i can not help but wonder who these girls have to cheat off of on the entrance exam to get in. the killer must carry a bag of really effective cleaning supplies and wipes up his mess between scenes. that the only logical explanation for why he could stab somebody to death on the carpet or in the bathroom and by the time somebody goes up to the hotel room and there is no trace of a struggle. (on another side note represent this is a very lazy killer. michael myers went hunting after his victims. just saying. ) it official represent the entire audience in the theater is rooting on the killer. what triggered it. was it whenever donna went back up to her hotel room while sirens were going off ordering everybody to exit the building. was it her constant dreams and and how even after going through something dramatic in said dream she insisted on reenacting her steps to a tee. or was it brittany snow unconvincing performance. i will have to say it was all of the above. okay and who had he dies off screen in the third act. you win the pot. finally and the movie is over. my friend turns to me and says donna wasn not too smart. that the understatement of the week. kind of like saying that a tornado is a small gust of wind and or a week long power outage is a slight inconvenience. i can not wait to get on rotten tomatoes and see if anybody gave this move a favoring review. i can not recommend this. i refuse to recommend this. this is as lazy of a horror film as any and and the only way to enjoy its cheese smelling plot is if you are under the influence of at least ten beers. and unfortunately for theater patrons and alcohol isn not served. rating represent out of . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i went into this with my hopes up and by twenty minutes into the movie i couldn not have been more let down. despite thinking that this would be another horribly bad remake and i kept my hopes high that maybe. just maybe someone would get it right this time around. sadly and prom night is about on the same quality level as the recent april fools day remake and bad script and bad direction and cheesy overdone acting and generally bad horror. from beginning to end it boring and repetitive and worthy of about a dozen eye rolls. we have seen it all before and we have seen it done a million times better then this. if you go to see prom night in the theater (i would say wait for the dvd or ppv) and get ready for the audience to laugh and because laugh they will. the laughs aren not at points in the movie that are supposed to be funny and they are in response to key thrilling moments in the film that are so poorly done you feel as if your watching the newest installment of scary movie. seriously and was this supposed to be a remake or a spoof. the film makers missed the mark so badly here and that a large number of the audience in the theater i attended walked out about halfway through the movie. which in retrospect and i wish i had done. not me though and i had to torture myself and stick with it hoping it would get better. needless to say it do not. the horror scenes are a joke and not even so much because of the acting but because of the direction and the script and the special effects and the camera work. the movie manages to look as if they spent a fortune to produce it and but still came out of it with a micro budget movie. i halfway expected to see dollar store tags on some of the props and kept thinking i would spot a porn star in the cast somewhere. this movies scary alright and if this is the future of big budget horror then the horror genre is doomed. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"prom night is a title only remake of the 1980 slasher flick that starred jamie lee curtis and leslie nielsen. this movie takes place in an oregon town and where donna (brittany snow) is about to go to her senior prom and let herself have some fun after going through some extremely traumatic events in the past few years. she and her friends arrive at the prom and which is taking place in a grand hotel and and try and enjoy what is supposed to be the most fun night of their lives. little does anyone know and a man from donna past and who has haunted her for years and is also at the prom. and is willing to kill anyone in way of his pursuit of her. i am a fan of the original prom night and so i tried to maintain a little hope in this movie and but i have to admit i was quite disappointed. prom night suffers from the worst affliction a horror movie could have and and that is predictability. there are absolutely no surprises here and and i felt i had seen everything in this movie done dozens of times and often better and before. what does this equate to for the audience. boredom. unless of course you have never seen any horror movies and or are part of the pre teen crowd and but the majority of the audience will most likely be able to guess nearly everything that is going to happen. the plot is simplistic and but the entire script is void of any type of surprise and twist and atmosphere and or anything and and this really and really hurts the movie because it never really gives the audience anything to sink their teeth into. it all just seemed very bland. a lot of people seem to complain with the fact that this is a pg 13 slasher movie as well and and i understand what they are saying and but i do not think it impossible to make a good slasher movie with minimal gore. take carpenter halloween for example little to no on screen violence and but still an extremely frightening and effective movie. you do not need gore to make a film scary and but even had prom night been gratuitously violent (which it is not and it is very tame) and it still would have added little to the movie because there is not much in the script to build on to begin with. the tension and suspense here is mild at best and and i spent most of the movie predicting the outcome of situations and and was correct about 99% of the time. our characters aren not well written enough either for the audience to make any connection to them and and their by the numbers demises are routine and careless. i will point out a few things i did like about this movie and though and because it wasn not completely useless the cinematography is really nice and and everything was very well filmed and fairly stylish. among the jump scares (that are for the most part very predictable) and there were a few that were kind of clever. the sets for the movie are nice too and the hotel is a neat place for the plot to unfold and however predictable the unfolding may be. as for the acting and it mediocre at best. brittany snow plays the lead decently and but really the rest of the cast doesn not show off much talent. johnathan schaech plays the villain and and is probably the most experienced performer here and but even he isn not that impressive. however and i did like the character he played and which was a nice change from the typical amasked stalker type killer we see a lot. as far as the ending goes and the last fifteen minutes of the film had me bored to my wit end and it was very anti climactic. overall and prom night was a disappointment. everything was very by the numbers and routine and and predictable and which is somewhat upsetting considering this had the potential to be a decent slasher movie. there were a few neat moments and but the movie lacked any suspense or atmosphere and and had little plot development and nor believable characters. i would advise seasoned horror fans to save their money and wait till it out on video and or rent the original instead and because there are absolutely no surprises here. some may find a little entertainment in it and but it was far too predictable for my tastes. i expected better and and left the theater very disappointed. negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"if i could give this film a real rating and it would likely be in the minus numbers. while i respect the fact that somebody has to keep making these terrible horror films and seriously and people and buying a ticket for this film is a waste of money you could be spending on something far more worth your time. despite it being a horror film and there is nothing scary about it and unless the idea of seeing how many horror cliché you can fit in one movie scares you. if the rating had been higher and it probably would have made for a better film in the long run. whoever made this version of prom night and you screwed up. the actors could probably have done a decent job if it weren not for the questionable scripting. this was a terrible waste of a cinema trip. i would sooner go and see one missed call again and at least that had some plot. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i think it was an overrated pg 13 crap. at least brittany snow performance was good and some others like idris elba were good too and but some others teens in the prom like the leads friends were not that convincing. the killer was so dumb and looked so stupid too. the deaths were stupid and boring and completely unoriginals. the movie was very boring too and very overrated. it wasn not suspenseful at all and i almost fall asleep. its another bad pg 13 remake and its really a dreadful movie imo. the ending was so stupid and the climax was very rushed and boring. the movie is pretty slow too. overall the only good thing about this crap fest is maybe brittany snow i think she gave a good performance and idris elba too and but besides that it was a completely dreadful movie and horrible remake. well thats just my opinion. i gave it a negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i saw this movie a few days ago and gamely jumped during the scary parts. i must admit and i found it pretty decent. until i started to think about what the characters were saying. logical problems represent1. her boyfriend and who seems to be a pretty fit dude and makes no sound while being killed. don not you think that he might have at least tried to take the killer. 2. when the remark is made that the gym teacher is soooo in love with lisa and i almost screamed at the screen. when your best friend family has been killed by a teacher who was in love with her and you do not make comments like that if you have half of a heart. 3. as soon as nash asks the uncle how many exits they have in the house and the uncle catches on that there may be danger ahead and do not the smart thing to do be to get donna and boyfriend and aunt and and uncle into a car and drive far and far away and then bait the house with the hrt and police force so that the killer has no way to get out. i could go on. and on. and on. basically and the plot was decent and the characters weren not profiled enough for you to actually feel any empathy when they were slaughtered and there were way too many errors. however. this movie might be good for teenagers and or young couples just looking for a fun night out. if you do not consider all the goofs and it a mediocre film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"why hollywood feels the need to remake movies that were so brilliant their prime (the texas chainsaw massacre and the hills have eyes) but is it considerably worse why hollywood feels the need to remake those horror films that weren not brilliant to start with (prom night and the amityville horror) much like their originals these remakes fail in creating atmosphere and character or any genuine scares at all. prom night is so flat and uninteresting its hard to watch and but for all the wrong reasons. it a poorly acted and massively uninteresting and ultimately dull excursion that fails at everything its designed to do. it clear hollywood horror is dead. even the likes of the hills have eyes and the texas chainsaw massacre managed to ruin their franchises in style with buckets of blood and a decent plot. prom night is virtually bloodless and i am not even going to mention how bad the plot is. its inability to seal the killers identify makes this the least suspenseful horror movie since erm. the original. one of the most notorious slasher films of the 1980s returns to terrorize filmgoers with this remake that proves just how horrifying high school dances can truly be. donna keppel (brittany snow) has survived a terrible tragedy and but now the time has come to leave the past behind and celebrate her senior prom in style. when the big night finally arrives and donna and her best friends prepare to enjoy their last big high school blowout by living it up and partying till dawn. but while donna is willing to look past her nightmares and into a brighter future and the man she thought she had escaped forever has returned for one last dance. an obsessed killer is on the loose and and he will slay anyone who attempts to prevent him from reaching his one and only donna. who will survive to see graduation day and and what will donna do when she forced to confront her greatest fear. scott porter and jessica stroup and and dana davis co star in the slasher remake that will have tuxedo clad teens everywhere nervously looking over their shoulders as they file out onto the dance floor. a plot that will probably put you off going to see this. witch if you ask me is a good thing. without much to work with and mccormick gamely tries to milk tension out of the most banal of situations. at one point and a girl backs into a floor lamp (a lamp. ) and mccormick tries to pump it up into a jump scare moment. desperate times really do call for desperate measures. there haven not been this many shots of closets since the last ikea catalogue. in the era of the hills and my super sweet 16 and to catch a predator and there probably is a freaky and scary movie to be mined from the commoditisation of glamour and society creepy obsession with youthful beauty. this is not that movie. my final verdict. avoid at all cost. nobody will like prom night and it even a disappointment to thoses who usually enjoy hack job remakes. considering its absolute lack of blood or frights. a night you will be in a hurry to forget. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"ok this movie was made for one reason and one reason only to make money. the producers obviously do not care about killing a classic horror movie. i knew this movie would suck as soon as it was going to be a pg 13 how many pg 13 slashers movies have turned out to be good. thats like asking how many women have been on the moon. the answer is none. prom night 1980 was of cource no masterpiece but it certainly deserves to be recognised as a movie that stays true to its genre and deosnt try to be anything more than that. my problem with prom night 2008 is the way that it handles the killer and i have 3 major problems with him. 1)the way he escapes and he was locked up in a mental institute and he escapes through a air conditioning vent. what the hell. why would they have an air conditioning vent in the patients room. do they want him to be comfortable during his stay or something. 2)his intentions are somewhat uncertain the killer want all of the main victims family and friends dead so he can have her all to his self and he says he loves her but the next minute he trys to kill her and so does he want to kill her and love her or just plain rape her. 3) the killer is too good and how did he develop all of his skills. he used to be a teacher and so in this one scene where he kills the main victims boyfriend while hes basically on top of her asleep and she doesn not notice and it all silly negative out of 10 terrible and silly and stupid attempt at a horror movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the night of the prom represent the most important night to any shallow girl composed almost entirely of plastic. and so the characters kept reminding us every ten minutes when some head peckingly miniscule event occurred in their miniscule lives. there really is no excuse for prom night. there is less than nothing original about it and i truly would have given it zero or less stars were it possible on imdb. the only part of my viewing that i enjoyed was when a group of teenagers sitting in front of us decided to play a game of ghosts. it was a lot more exciting than whatever was going on on the screen in front of them. the plot was basically some guy going on a rampage. and the thing was and it wasn not even a slightly exciting rampage. maybe if the guy had been remotely frightening rather than a tame robbie williams lookalike with a baseball cap and i might have sat there feeling slightly anxious. the fact that i cared less about the characters than i did about the colour of the cinema carpet do not really add to the effect and either. and to make matters worse and the rest of the characters were equally one dimensional and oblivious. the hotel staff do not seem to notice or care that one of their maids had vanished and are further proof that a murderer is unrecognisable after he has had a shave. i was incredibly surprised that the bitchy and stereotypical girl in the blue dress was the only person to notice who he was. she realises this and then proceeds to fall down the stairs and entangle herself in a plastic sheet and then knock over a pile of paint buckets. nice one. the worst thing was and i hold the belief that that the director was trying his absolute hardest. he really pushed all boundaries by not showing any killing actually happening. shocking. and the music and do not even get me started. it was almost as appropriate as stripping at a funeral. i really wish that prom night was a joke. it was terrible and stupidly predictable. no one and in their right mind or otherwise and has any reason to see this film. mainstream cinema seems to be going downhill and films like this worsen the situation. if you get the urge to see this absolutely awful film and hear my plea. don not do it. there are better things to spend six pounds on. like a sheet to play ghosts with. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the acting was horrendous as well as the screenplay. it was poorly put together and made you almost want to laugh at the several terribly acted out murder scenes. the ending was even worse. everyone kept dying and but somehow the ending made it look like everything was perfectly ok. they did not give enough history about the obsession the teacher had and etc. the movie needed more time to perhaps develop a better storyline. the only reason i give this negative is that i kind of feel bad for the young actors. they needed better coaching. they could have really made this an ok film and but the screenplay and acting failed miserably. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i saw this film by accident and this movie was an accident. well it must of been. blonde women being stalked and the villain appearing then disappearing getting from one place to another in minute then disappearing and reappearing and hiding. he wasnt even a super hero so i do not know how he did it. he couldnt frighten a cat and that not hard to do. the old mirror in the bathroomis just not scary anymore in fact it stopped being scary years ago. you had the cop on the trail of the villain and another cliché(played by idris elba with a very convincing american accent and he from london) the director didnt have a clue and has made a film full of cliché and make scary movewhich was a comedy look scary. pathetic. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"when i first saw the preview for this movie and i really couldn not wait to see it. the plot seemed good and the setting was great. i mean and a slasher movie that takes place on prom night and great idea. and the plot represent a high school teacher that becomes sexually obsessed with one of his students and goes crazy and gets arrested and and escapes three years later on prom night. prom night and a night that is supposed to be happy and memorable and turns into hell. however and i saw it and was extremely disappointed. it was not only the worst horror movie i have ever seen and but it was one of the worst movie in general that i have ever seen. first of all and it wasn not even scary. there was not one moment in that movie when i jumped out of my seat. also and the murder scenes were so cheesy and dull. all the slasher did was either stab his victims in the stomach multiple times or cut their throats. also there was absolutely no gore (its rated pg 13). the scene with the most blood was probably the one where the killer murders the black girl. he slits her throat and blood splatters on the sheets hanging around them (they do not actually show him cutting her throat). next and you see the killers face the first time he is introduced in the movie. he isn not mysterious and creepy and or scary. he just this guy who kills people. also and everything in the movie was so cliché. an example is when and at the end and the killer is about to kill the main character and at the last moment and the detective shoots and kills him. also and every single thing in this movie was so predictable. the victim and after seeing the guy with a knife and runs for her life and hides and thinks she gets away and and then the killer just pops out and kills her. finally and the sequence of the movie was extremely bad. the guy goes into the hotel and kills a few people and the bodies are discovered and someone pulls the fire alarm and and everyone evacuates. the main character forgets something in her room and has an encounter with the killer and runs and escapes. thats it. she and her boyfriend go home and the slasher kills the guards patrolling the house and finds the girl and then gets killed by the detective. the movie sequence was so stupid and cliché. if your thinking of seeing this movie all because the preview looked good and trust me and do not waste your time or money. no wonder this movie was being shown in the smallest theater in the movie theater. my friend and i and along with these two girls sitting in the back and were the only ones in the theater. that should have told me something about the movie beforehand. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"we have all been asking ourselves why do not they remake the slasher films that were only ok instead of remaking the ones that were great already and that way they can only make it better. well with prom night they have remade the average but trashy fun 80s jamie lee curtis film and made it even worse. its a paint by numbers slasher film which is clearly trying to attract the young teens (hence no violence etc) and the knife in this slasher flick is blunt. the director spends so much time focusing on trying to make the rather attractive killer look somewhat creepy that anything else goes out of the window. the cast who include britney snow (who was superb in hairspray) try their hardest but the material gives them nothing to do but pout and look scared. more annoying is how the death scenes are handled (we will hear the attack but wont see it). it also looks like the only place the knife in this film worked was in the editing suite since the film looks like it has been butchered (im guessing anything remotely scary ended up on the cutting room floor so as not to scare the kids) yet in pours the money from americans sending this film to number 1 at the box office. slasher movies are a lot of fun but in prom nights case it made me want to download the original. i have seen scarier oc and dawsons creek episodes. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i am a big fan of the tv series largo winch. this movie was pain for me. i had to use fast forward not to fell to sleep. it was boring. how can somebody ruin this title so much. the story was the only good thing. actors were sh. t. they can not live the role. the main actor(tom . ) is a null. watch the other roles of this actor. the fighting scenes were unbelievable boring and not to followable and somehow they were not to follow the situation. like other reviewer said low budget film with bad actors. maybe next time somebody else can do better thing out of this title. french can not do right thing with big films and like alien 4. that was bit brrr and after alien 1 and 2 and 3. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"first of all and if your a fan of the comic and well and you will be very disappointed i am sure . low budget movie . largo is supposed to be serbian in the comic and now suddenly he becomes croatian and pfff. chicken producers and it gave some spice and guts to the comic ( by the way and in the film and his father speaks serbian and he speaks croatian. lol ). the striking n. y. winch building becomes a common average small yacht in h. k. the good looking largo becomes some unshaved tzigan or turkish looking guy. freddy the cool carface pilot becomes some fat and out of shape and sad and average guy. simon and largo good buddy and does not exist at all . he gave some pepper . largo doesn not throw knifes at all and but just some snake stares. the whole story is confused and looks like a pretentious tv film. french directors and producers and if you do not have the money and the ability or the technology to adapt correctly the comic and please stick to some romance shooted in paris. very very bad film and good thing i just rented it and do not count on me to watch the sequel ( if there is any . ). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"in my knowledge and largo winch was a famous belgium comics (never read) telling the adventures of a playboy and a sort of james bond without the spy life. so and when i had to choose a movie for a 5 years old kid and i picked it up because the kid was already a great fan of james bond. but and just after the opening credits and i got heavy doubts represent when american movies offer amazing start and here and no action and a torrid sex scene
then and the story get very complicated with financial moves
i thought i lost the kid. but and strangely and he had been caught by largo and and more than james bond. was it the excellent interpretation of tomer sisley. the difficult relationship largo has with his father. the multiple box story in which the friends are the bad guys and the bad guys are the friends. the exotic locations of honk kong and yougoslavia. dunno and but he really cares about largo (will he get up. ) and we enjoyed our moment. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"chilly and alienating adaptation of rebecca west book about an army captain returning from duty in wwii with his memory impaired (now there an original idea. ). it seems he remembers old flame glenda jackson but not current wife julie christie and which should be enough to set off some emotional sparks. this extremely well cast soaper brings together leading man alan bates with director alan bridges and co stars jackson and christie and ann margret and and ian holm and but the burners are all on low. there are a handful of good scenes (particularly whenever jackson is on screen) and but bridges pacing is unrelievedly sluggish and the film dulled out color is enervating. long on the shelf and this soldier is best left forgotten. half from . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"but cinderella gets my vote and not only for the worst of disney princess movies and but for the worst movie the company made during walt lifetime. the music is genuinely pretty and and the story deserves to be called classic. what fails in this movie are the characters and particularly the title character and who could only be called the heroine in the loosest sense of the term. after a brief prologue and the audience is introduced to cinderella. she is waking up in the morning and singing a dream is a wish your heart makes. this establishes her as an idealist (and thus deserving of our sympathy). unfortunately and the script gives us no clue as to what she is dreaming about. freedom from her servant role. the respect of her step family. someone to talk to besides mice and birds. in one song (cut from the movie but presented in the special features section of the latest dvd) cinderella relates her wish that there could be many of her so she could do her work more efficiently. you go girlfriend. in short and cinderella is a very bland character. she passively accepts her step family abuse and escaping into her unspoken dreams for relief. she only asserts herself once by reminding her stepmother that she is still a member of the family. for this and she is given permission to go the ball if she completes her housework and finds something to wear and a token gesture that is clearly absurd to everyone except and of course and cinderella. can anyone see belle or jasmine being such a doormat. if cinderella is dull and her male counterpart is nothing short of lifeless. the prince in cinderella gets no dialog and almost no screen time. we are given no indication if he is a good man and if he respects cinderella or anything. all we know is 1) he is a prince and 2) he dances well. heck and even the prince from snow white got to sing a romantic song at least. not only does this lack of development make the romance less interesting and it makes cinderella look like either a social climber or an idiot and weakening her already tenuous appeal. perhaps realizing how dull the main characters were and the animators chose to give excessive screen time to the movie comic relief and cinderella friends and the mice. granted and these characters are amusing. even so and when the comic relief steals the show from the principals and well and let just say your story has some problems. dinsey loves to proclaim all its animated features as masterpieces. while many of them are and there are some that do not deserve this appellate in any way. cinderella is a prime example of this fact. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"just saw it yesterday in the sao paulo intl film festival. just before going i came here to see how it was rated and and at that time it was 7. 4 and a pretty nice rate. after 15 minutes i was dying to get out (never did this) and but felt embarrassed to do so as the producer of the movie was in the screening. i did not like at all and the dialogs are shallow and lead nowhere and the characters are shallower than the dialogs and nothing lead anywhere and and the worst and worst represent plenty of siemens and organics advertising on the movie. despite the fact that i already paid to go to the movie and entertain myself and i still have to be bombarded by the main character chatting on the internet and siemens mobile popping up all the time on her lap top while or another character having a bath or cutting her hair just to have organics shampoo displayed enormously on the screen. all of this would be bearable if the plot and characters and romances and anything was good and but was bad and really bad. a do not know how to do sex in the city. don not waste your time or money. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"when i bought this dvd i though represent it seems to be a nice light comedy about love and relationships made up in portuguese standards
let give it a chance
i was totally wrong. what a disappointing movie. first and it not a comedy while it a cheap drama which can be so melodramatic that it even worse than many portuguese soap operas. second and the plot is so boring and and leads nowhere
it has no structure and it just flows and like the wind and in one or another direction
the production is also bad. the sound mixing is horrible and because sometimes the voices are disconnected. it made me remind some old portuguese movies from the 80
the acting should have been better too
well and to sum up and it not with films like this one that portuguese cinema will improve. in fact and it was one of the worst portuguese movies i have seen in the last years. bad argument and bad acting and bad production
i had no high hopes for this movie and but it was much worse than i have ever imagined. just forget about it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"(i will indicate in this review the point where spoilers begin. ) my dissatisfaction is split represent 30% tone deafness and 70% lackluster writing. the 30% represent i agree with the first commenter synopsis about the lack of diversity in the characters and scope of the stories. i was surprised how and this film and at best and woefully shortchanges the real nyc by presenting a collection of people and relationships so narrow as to come across as if it inhabited only by the cast of gossip girl (this is coming from someone who likes gossip girl). a few minority characters are written into the stories and but they are included by obligation and while we can see the gears under the film so clearly and striving to be diverse but falling ever so short. the 70% is why everything falls short. all characters and white plus a few token minorities and are one dimensional and cardboard cutouts of people concepts. worse and their interactions with each other are scripted in such a way that for each vignette in the film the audience is treated to what i would say is a gag represent we get a basic conceit and then some punchline intended to be a clever twist. but even if we suspended cynicism for a moment to say and okay and that was a surprise. the stories are still not that interesting and because they and too and are shallow. when you fashion stories so that their existence hinges solely on the unexpectedness of the ending and youre writing jokes. spoilers below. the movie primarily tries to tell romantic stories. that fine. but romance is amazing and deep and sometimes complex. these romantic stories each feature a girl and a boy who at some point share the same location and get to look at each other. words exchange and thoughts are projected through voice over and but they too only manage to communicate to the audience merely that one person is attracted to another. meaning and there is no seduction (in the broad sense) and no tension and and neither confrontation nor communion between the wills of two different people trying to reconcile their existence to accommodate the other. the only story involving a superficial seduction is told just so the audience ends up being surprised that the guy (ethan hawke) gets outwitted by the girl he hitting on and who unexpectedly turns out to be a hooker. sure and his words when trying to pick her up are interesting to hear and we are amused as we would be if we were next to them and but there is nothing of substance to this story outside of a then b. so it unfolds and if something like a postcard could unfold and with all the other tales as well represent a then b that it and the only point being that these happen to occur on set in manhattan. by the way and the only brooklyn we see is the coney island sketch while the only queens is the flickering of a train ride taken by a character traveling to the west village. it easy to pick at movies that play into all the common stereotypes of race and gender and sexual orientation and and so on. _new york and i love you_ and however and deserves to be held to stricter scrutiny because of its title. we expect to see the real new york and and real new yorkers and but instead we have paraded before us the selected slice of a demographic and its characters flown in from the o. c. and plus a few others to make it seem as if we are paying attention to diversity. but when we look closer at who those characters are and the whole sham becomes an affront to the very notion of diversity and the ethnicities and cultures the movie shamefully fails to represent. for example and the story with the latino man with the little white girl in the park and who gets mistaken by two ladies as her manny (male nanny) when in fact he the father. notwithstanding the last scene of this part was unnecessary from a dramatic construction point of view (it would have been far more interesting to end it when the mother and boyfriend or stepfather are strutting the girl away) and it is frankly a bit disgusting that the scene where we learn for sure that the girl father is latino also must inform us that he is a sexually desirable dancer. what and the dad can not be just some guy from south america. now that he obviously hot and is the audience better prepared to accept that he had a kid with a middle to upper class white woman. are we that naive as to require such. as if a mexican construction worker would obviously be too unpalatable. it not my place to dictate where the movie should have gone. but in every conceivable set up and plot twist and the direction taken screams status quo and appeals to safety. all these stories could have been made more interesting and even if we were forced to keep the single dimensionality of the characters inhabiting them and at the very least by not choosing from standard and obvious stereotypes. asian girl living in chinatown being leered at by a scraggly old white guy. how bout an asian cougar pursuing a white college kid instead. again and i am not saying the entire conceit has to be changed. it just that every. damn. story premise. is so hackneyed and thus they fail to convey anything about why one might love new york and outside the trite. the real way to have improved the film would be to have written a script worth reading. i will concede the pleasantness of the soundtrack and the good pacing of the movie (even if what was being paced was and well and dredge) and and the general feel of many of the scenes. the movie was just fine to sit through and and i do not dissuade anyone from doing so. however and it is telling that the most significant homage paid to non superficiality is when the old opera singer says (paraphrased) that what i love about new york represent everyone from a different place. well and you do not know it from watching this one. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"having loved paris and je taime and i highly anticipated this film and i admit i went in with high expectations and but was sorely disappointed for a number of reasons. although and i was not expecting a re make of paris in new york i was expecting the same structure. what i liked about paris was the breakup of the neighborhoods. you got a sense of each directors style and the story they wanted to tell. in ny and there is no clear separation of the stories and at different points in the film and characters from different stories run into each other which made me confused as to who i was watching and what exactly was going on. also and the switch in directing was evident but confusing since there was no flow. another thing i loved about the paris film was the different takes on love. it wasn not all romantic. there was love between parents and their children and unrequited love and a lonely and middle aged woman yearning for love etc. and it explored so many layers of the complexity of love between humans. ny seemed to only go for an edgy and over the top sexuality. there were some redeemable shorts (the older couple having spent a lifetime together and julie christie short) and but overall theny film do not evoke any emotion for me. i do not connect with any of the characters like i did with paris. i remember watching paris and feeling a deep sadness and loneliness and yearning and hopefulness and wonder. it just had so much soul. for me and there was no soul in the ny film. maybe if i had gone into it without having paris looming in the back of my brain as a comparison this film might have elicited a more favorable response and but as a self titled re take of paris and je taime i was sorely disappointed. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i saw this regurgitated pile of vignettes tonight at a preview screening and i was straight up blown away by how bad it was. first off and the film practically flaunted its gaping blind spots. there are no black or gay new yorkers in love. or who and say and know the self involved white people in love. i know it not the love crash of anvil tastic inclusiveness but you can not pretend to have a cinematic new york with out these fairly prevalent members of society. plus and you know the people who produced this ish thought crash deserved that ham handed oscar and so where is everyone. possibly worse than the bizarre and willful socioeconomic ignorance were the down right offensive chapters (remember when you were in high school and people were openly disgusted with pretty young women in wheelchairs. me either). this movie ran the gamut of ways to be the worst. bad acting and bad writing and bad directing all spanning every possible genre ever to concern wealthy white people who smoke cigarettes outside fancy restaurants. but thank god they finally got powerhouses hayden christensen and rachel bilson back together for that jumper reunion. and and side note and uma dodged a bullet while ethan hawke looks ravaged. this and of course and is one thing in terms of his looks and but added an incredibly creepy extra vibe of horribleness to his terrifyingly scripted scene opposite poor and lovely maggie q. i had a terrible time choosing my least favorite scene for the end of film questionnaire and but it has to be the anton yelchin or olivia thirlby bit for the sheer lack of taste and which saddens me because i really like those two actors. i do not consider myself easily offended and but all i could do was scoff and look around with disgust like someone 50 year old aunt. a close second place in this incredibly tight contest of terrible things is shia labeouf tone deaf portrayal of what it means for a former disney channel star to act against julie christie. i do not mean opposite and i mean against. against is the only explanation. i realize now that the early sequence with orlando bloom is a relative highlight. highlight. please keep that in mind when your brain begins to leak out your ear soon after the opening credits and which seem to be a nod to the first new york real world. this film is embarrassing and strangely dated and inarticulate and ineffective and pretentious and and in the end and completely divorced from any real idea of new york at all. (the extra star is for the cloris leachman or eli wallach sequence and as it is actually quite sweet and but it is only one bright spot in what feels like hours of pointless and masturbatory torment. ). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i have never been to paris and but after seeing paris and je taime i am crazy to visit this city. i have been to ny several times and i love the city and its boroughs. i kinda expected to be touched by this film and to feel like jumping into a plane and fly there right away and but and lo and behold and i regret the time and money i spent with it. there are no love stories between people or a person and the city. there a lot of dysfunctional meetings and relations or people who know each other and it just doesn not work out fine. maybe this reflects a characteristic of the city and where it said to have thousands of people living on their own. can not you find love in new york. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"this was a movie i could not wait to see. so i finally got it and i was pretty disappointed. for starters and the movie has so little said about new york and just a bunch of confusing shots of buildings and streets and bridges and cafes. it really doesn not stay focused on the new york magic. another thing that changed my mind was the french movie set inside this movie. i know that it is a remake and but it is not a french style remake. anyway and here you will notice elements that remind you of french movies and such as long and messy scenes and no or little talking and of course everyone is smoking french style . the story follows many lives ( too many for my taste) and they somehow seem connected in the end. i feel like there was no dedication to the characters as much as there was on the stories. the movie was too short to cover every single destiny everyone happy ending. so we can see about 30 people for about 5 minutes each. and there you have your 120 minutes . if you like active scenes dialogues and stuff this is not the movie for you . i give it 4 just because i love new york and i loved the cast . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"following the success of paris and je taime and a group of directors decided to get together and make a similar anthology style film based in new york. unlike the original film and the stories in this film seem to sometimes come and go too quickly by the time you think are getting into a story and it over in too many cases. and and the often start up and stop and then begin again with the stories woven together. as a result and there is no title to indicate that a story is complete and it is less formal in structure. sadly and however and while paris and je taime was hit or miss (mostly hit) and most of new york and i love you was miss. the stories tended to be much more sexual in nature but also far less sweet and often quite terrible. it was an amazingly dull and uninteresting film with only a few exceptional stories and perhaps the often depressing music made it seem more so. now understand and it was good quality music but its somber tone really and really made me feel like cutting my wrists. among the better ones was the story about the young man who took a girl in a wheelchair to prom and the couple talking about cheating outside a restaurant (though this was also in the first film) and the crotchety old couple. this is all so sad because i had loved the first film so much and i really wanted to love this film. i respected what they tried but simply do not like it very much. by the way and and this is not really a complaint and but i was amazed how many people were smoking in the film. for a recent film and that was unusual in our more anti smoking culture. also and if you get the dvd and there are two segments included as extras that were not included in the film. one consists of kevin bacon (wearing a cool fedora) eating a hotdog. and absolutely nothing more for almost ten minutes. the other features a teen who spends the film videotaping the world including a very unhappy couple. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"a few years back the same persons who created paris and jtaime. and which was imperfect but very enjoyable ( my rating was a 7) and created this piece of garbage about new york city. in paris and i love you (jtaime)created a feeling for paris and it was made in many parts of beautiful paris. in this current film and i did not recognize new york city and i did not feel that i was in the city of my birth. new york does have 5 boroughs and i saw no scenes in the bronx and or queens and there is one scene in brooklyn and (brighton beach) and i saw no scenes in times square or greenwich village or no scenes of the beautiful hotels or theatres. it does have a large cast and most of the performers were not even stereotypes and they were caricatures of the lowest sort. the very few humorous moments are all of a course sexual nature or quite insulting to the many fine new yorkers that we all know and love. a few of the films nominated for the razzie awards were far better. ratings represent (out of 4) 20 points (out of 100) imdb 1 (out of 10)in my way of thinking i think the title should have beennew york and i hate you. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"an anthology is always risky business and i think this endeavor should be praised. there a lot of talent involved here. a great many talented actors and directors and writers. unfortunately and i couldn not really enjoy this movie based on three issues i had. first of all and the segments vary incredibly in tone and quality. and unfortunately some of them clash with the others. secondly and several segments feel underdeveloped to me. like seeds of good stories that never come to fruition. i am not talking about happy endings here (or even an ending period) but rather and they lack even basic development or even solid setups that draw you in. last but not least and i did not feel new york and its inhabitants were properly portrayed. what youre left with is high brow short films that may still be of interest to some but will leave the average viewer unsatisfied. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"new york and i love you and or rather should be titled manhattan and i love looking at your people in sometimes love and is a precise example of the difference between telling a story and telling a situation. case in point and look at two of the segments in the film and one where ethan hawke lights a cigarette for a woman on a street and proceeds to chat her up with obnoxious sexy talk and and another with orlando bloom trying to score a movie with an incredulous demand from his director to read two dostoyevsky books. while the latter isn not a great story by any stretch and it at least something that has a beginning and middle and end and as the composer tries to score and gets dostoyevky dumped in his lap and and in the end gets some help (and maybe something more) from a girl he been talking to as a liaison between him and the director. the ethan hawke scene and however and is like nothing and and feels like it and like a fluke added in or directed by a filmmaker phoning it in (or and for that matter and hawke with a combo of before sunrise and reality bites). what irksome about the film overall is seeing the few stories that do work really well go up against the one or two possible tories and then the rest of the situations that unfold that are made to connect or overlap with one another (i. e. bits involving bradley cooper and drea dematteo and hayden christensen and andy garcia and james caan and natalie portman and etc). it not even so much that the film set practically always in manhattan and not the new york of queens or staten island or the bronx (not even and say and harlem or washington heights) lacks a good deal of diversity and since there is some. it the lack of imagination that one found in spades and for better or worse and in paris jtaime. it mostly got little to do with new york and except for passing references and and at its worst (the julie christie or shia labeouf segment) it incomprehensible on a level that is appalling. so and basically and wait for tv and and do your best to dip in and out of the film in and that is and for three scenes represent the aforementioned bloom or christina ricci segment which is charming while the brett ratner directed segment (yes and x men 3 brett ratner) with a very funny story of a teen taking a girl in a wheelchair to the prom only to come upon a great big twist while and eli wallach and cloris leachman as an adorable quite old couple walking along in brooklyn on their 67th wedding anniversary. everything else can be missed and even natalie portman directorial debut and and the return of a hughes brother (only one and allan) to the screen. a mixed bag is putting it lightly represent it like having to search through a bag of mixed nuts full of crappy peanuts to find the few almonds left. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"the problems with this film are many and but i will try to mention the most glaring and bothersome ones. first of all and while the theme suggests a number of vignettes about manhattan life and the reality was that everything and as usual in movies and tv and was about something bizarre and usually of a sexual nature. the story lines were thin or nonexistent and and virtually every scene and camera shot and line of dialog and and expressed emotion was absolutely and and totally fake. it finally reached a point after an hour of so of mind numbing garbage that i walked out (something no uncommon for me in recent years. ) i would have guessed the fi9lm was directed by some wannabe auteur drop outs from some 3rd rate film studies program and but i believe the (at one time and pre amelia and talented)director mira nair took part in this disgusting travesty and so perhaps the directorial talent in america has descended en masse into the cesspool. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"there is a reason this went straight to video the story is smarmy and nick cage plays johnny in a sleazy way sex in churches and and other scenes that border on tasteless(like the scene in the laundry room) taint this movie. judge reinhold as the cuckold is okay but the movie itself with its themes of degradation and revenge are not well done. but it is a good film for trivia contests because so few people saw it. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"thanks to some infamous home video distributor who brought in the so called german independent series and four for venice is not only awful and but really awful. so awful and that i have it dumped at the second hand goods store for extra cash. nick and charlotte is a married couple who reached an agreement of having sex only on tuesday due to their hectic schedule of their profession. eva and luis is a pair of couple living from hand to mouth and where eva works as a waitress and luis and an artist. nick indirectly causes eva to lose her job as an waitress. luis and charlotte had an affair at the back of eva and nick. luis cheated on eva by lying to her that he would be flying off to london to do something related to his artwork and but the fact is and he is flying off to venice with charlotte for an adultery holiday. eva kidnapped nick and dragged her 2 kids along to venice for confrontation. the trip to venice ends up both nick and eva falling for one another. the presentation of the journey from germany to venice between nick and eva marks the failure of the comedy. it not only look senseless and but also draggy. in the film and nick try to seek help for several ways and but it ends to no avail. it is either the strangers around him who acts like morons and or they are just simply dumb. the comedy also had the tendency to add in unnecessary scenes to lengthen the story. while some of the problems that can be solved with common sense and no one in the film are using common sense to solve the problem. they prefer to go through one big round to solve the problem. it fails so bad and that even the beautiful sceneries in venice fails to pull up the reputation of the film. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"garson kanin wrote and directed this look at modern day las vegas and the gap between generations and his first directorial effort since the 1940s. david janssen is somewhat miscast as a big shot casino owner who reunites with his son (robert drivas and who looks disconcertingly like an older jason bateman). janssen approaches every scene the same way represent defensively and with a chip on his shoulder. playing this role cool and laid back is asking too much from janssen and who barks at everyone like a grouchy put upon husband (he even chews out don rickles and makes him cry. ). his son and a neer do well in search of his own identity and makes hip comments about how young people look down on vegas (give them another ten years) and and his disapproval of dad lifestyle causes friction. brenda vaccaro is cute as a self conscious secretary and edy willaims has a fun bit as a showgirl at an audition. unfortunately and where it at doesn not have much else going for it other than the now dated ruminations on ethics between adults and their kids and some quick t and a shots and amusingly jaded satirical bits on the high stakes world of gambling most of which has been covered by now and ad nauseum. from . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"casting bone to pick represent david jannsen was 38 playing the father of robert drivas and who was then and 31 (yeah and i realize he supposed to be just out of college and but clues in the script have him being a loafer and so he probably 24 25 in the script that still puts jannsen in parenting classes in junior high). i assume the ama wrote medical miracle up in their 1938 year in medicine. this movie hasn not aged very well at all and now it main appeal is just to see a snap shot of sin city and circa 1969 and all the incessant smoking and the weird hair (drivas has an atomic comb over that makes him resemble a well groomed hip cousin it) and trendy fashions that went along with it. if anyone remembers and lv wasn not exactly london. the city coddled the mob and codger gamblers in those days. drivas comes off as sexually ambiguous while his dad thinks he might be gay (in a sad irony and drivas himself died of aids at 47) and the soapy conflict is from the generation gap issue (ahem and as if one may call 7 years a gap). sonny boy wants to be his own man and dad wants to pull him into the casino (caesar palace. ) and and plies him with girls (including the horny for money edy williams). interestingly enough and the son doesn not seem to mind being thought of as gay unusual for the time and a cute brenda vaccarro is nearby to swoon platonically over him. what nudity there is is awfully lame just what was needed to pull the audience in for an r rating in the early days of the mpaa rating system (which then was g m r[16] and x). the editing is horrible and there stupid silly overdubs by the committee (a late 60 neo avante garde comedy troupe that mercifully faded off the map within a couple of years). don rickles is on board as a blackjack dealer. seemingly preparing him for a role as a floor manager in the much better casino two decades later. not to give anything away and but they would have dealt with mr. rickles character with power tools and a hole in the desert back then. a curiosity at best and far from joshua logan usual caliber of work. dos or dias. now go watch casino again. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i can only believe that garson kanin must have been two people. the one who wrote the brilliant a double life and the funny born yesterday and co wrote such excellent screenplays as adam rib and pat and mike with his wife ruth gordon and then the one who wrote and or or directed such tiresome and sad drivel as bachelor mother and some kind of a nut and and this. the cast tries and but the script is so tired and clichéd that even the efforts of the always wonderful brenda vaccaro are defeated. the script sinks to it nadir in the truly offensive sequence in which janssen character tests drivas character to make sure he not gay. an ugly sequence and but sadly one which could easily play in a film today. ethnic jokes are now totally verboten and but fag jokes are still good and clean and family fun. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i was thrilled to watch this movie expecting it to be the sequel to the cult classic private lessons which portrays the dream of any male teenager. private lessons ii has nothing to do with the title i mention. it just a regular soft core cinemax flick that would not make a change in your life. there just one hot sex scene in a rooftop but that it. i watched this a long time ago but believe me and this is just a regular boring soft core flick. the women are hot but that not enough to rent or buy the movie. my advice is to watch this only if it airs on cable. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"up until the last 20 minutes and i was thinking that this is possibly jackie chan worst movie (excluding his pre 1978 work and which i am not familiar with). the final fight sequence changed all that represent it is long and good and intense indeed and one of the highlights of chan career. but to get to it and you have to sit through a lot of comedy that might amuse five year olds (oh and look. someone threw a tomato at that guy face) and endless football scenes. not to mention the dubbing (which includes the line how can i turn it off. it not a tap watch to find out what it refers to). dragon lord is worth renting for the final fight alone and but the rest of the movie is only for jackie collectors and and even then only for those who have already seen at least 15 of his other movies. (). "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"when i sat down to watch this film i actually expected quite a bit and as the plot takes on quite complex issues. using football as launching pad for the complication also was an interesting approach. still unfortunately and despite its bravery of dealing with controversial issues as culture clashes between muslim and western culture and adding generation conflicts and prejudice towards gays or lesbians and it lets you down towards the resolution with a rather simplistic relief to all the suspense built up throughout the film. this leads me to the impression that the makers took on a little too big a task for themselves to tackle and attempting to be more profound then they managed to deal with. however and this does not mean that the film is directly bad and as it rendering of the conflicts where quite believable and also amusing. the film succeeds in being engaging and entertaining in this matter and but as mentioned above the writers seem to have spun themselves a little too deep. this has led to some quite unrealistic character behaviour towards the end to confront the surging conflicts. by this dropping the ball at a time where the makers could really have shown brilliance taking the film to another level of appreciation. even if the film does at no point really attempt to be a profound piece of drama and the setting has so much potential in the plot it becomes a disappointment when the ball drops. this way the film moves from being a good and reflected comedy to a standard cliché that becomes ridiculous in its happy ending. nothing is left out in the hollywood like ending. so even if the story is engaging and one can stomach the large amount of montages and one can not help but roll eyes towards the resolution. personally i was close to shouting finish already. at the screen. there were some decent acting in the film and and the two young female central characters had some good moments. so did their parents and other bi characters. however the handsome irish coach was an embarrassing piece of acting and that lets the film down quite a bit in terms of realism. he do not even appear very likable and but rather self involved despite his good deeds and which makes the impending conflict between the girls seem a little strained. i give the film a 4 and as it was an engaging story and they sought out a nice perspective to approach the subject from. the script and cast had many good believable characters and giving the audience a chance to recognise either themselves or others. had the let downs not been this disappointing and i would easily give the film a 7 or 8. if you enjoyed this film and i would recommend the film east is east and which i think is an as good and if not better rendering of cultural conflict and as well as being amusing and engaging. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"long and boring and blasphemous. never have i been so glad to see ending credits roll. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"an executive and very successful in his professional life but very unable in his familiar life and meets a boy with down syndrome and escaped from a residence . both characters feel very alone and and the apparently less intelligent one will show to the executive the beauty of the small things in life. with this argument and the somehow amelie like atmosphere and the sentimental music and i do not expect but a moralistic disgusting movie. anyway and as there were some interesting scenes (the boy is sometimes quite a violent guy) and and the interpretation of both actors and daniel auteil and pasqal duquenne and was very good and i decided to go on watching the movie. the french cinema and in general and has the ability of showing something that seems quite much to life and opposed to the more stereotyped american cinema. but and because of that and it is much more disappointing to see after the absurd ending and with the impossible death of the boy and the charming tone and the happiness of the executive family and the cheap moral and the unbearable laughter of the daughters and the guy waving from heaven as michael landon. really nasty and in my humble opinion. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"first of all and i was expecting caged heat to be along the same lines as ilsa and the wicked warden. boy and was i wrong. in no way is this film 70s exploitation and chix in chains and or women in prison. sure and the plot consists of a bunch of women in prison and who wear street clothes btw (quite comical) and but nothing happens. there aren not strong rivalries and no one tries to seduce the warden or doctor in order to try and escape and and no inmates make out. there are 2 shower scenes and that i suspect is just recycled footage and but no fights breaks out or no one is seduced here or anywhere for that matter. aside from the lack of plot and unconvincing and unsympathetic and and flat characters and a couple of inmates that do manage to escape actually return to the prison in order to free their fellow inmates. puh lease and the movie should have just ended off with the escapees riding off into the sunset. as opposed to letting this mess continue. i feel scammed. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"nicholas walker is paul and the local town reverand who married to martha (ally sheedy) and but also is a habitual womanizer and decides to fake his own death to run away with his current affair and veronica (dara tomanovich). however in so doing and he gets a bout of amnesia (hence the name of the film). sally kirkland is also on hand as a crazy old coot who pines for the good reverand in a shades of misery type of way. it sad to see a pretty good cast wasted like this. not the least bit john savage in a horridly forgettable role as a shoddy private investigator. in a film billed as a black comedy and one has to bring both elements into said movie. while this does bring the former in spades and it sadly contains none of the latter. furthermore you can not emphasize with any of the characters and as thus and have absolutely no vested interest in them. technically not an all together bad movie just an extremely forgettable one. eye candy represent dara tomanovich gets topless while sally kirkland also shows some skin my grade represent c where i saw it represent showtime showcase. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"towards the end of this thriller ally sheedy gaunt latter day image is used creatively to make up more than one hauntingly evil image. she convinces one that and if a nasty bette davis type role were to come her way and she could carry it off brilliantly. unfortunately and i can not find many other reasons for seeing this. if you have wondered what sheedy looks like in a pair of old fashioned glasses (but why should anyone. ) then here your answer. for the rest and sally kirkland sex starved crazy woman is really tiresome and and even if you like this sort of thing more than i do you will have to admit that the tension sags badly during these scenes. savage drunken brute of an insurance agent is equally distasteful but at least it a small role. of the leading actors and nicholas walker inspires no sympathy at all for paul keller plight and his acting is wooden. dara tomanovich is better and during her scenes with sheedy the level rises a little. sheedy meticulous and understated performance (though she often seems to be on automatic pilot) is admirable in itself but out of context with the rest. the sets are drab and the camera work undistinguished. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"where to start. if this movie had been a dark comedy and i would say it was fannn tastic. unfortunately for me and and anyone else with free time and a buck to spare (mind you that was the price i paid and got it from wal mart) and this movie was meant to be a thriller. the only thrill i got was watching kirkland lousy rendition of anne wilkes from misery sans snowy woodland area. if you want a good laugh and on a rainy friday night with some friends and then i highly recommend this movie. but if you want to watch something at least half way decent and then do not even bother. i for one enjoy crappy films and the worse the better in most cases. but wow. i meant wow. the only person in the entire film that do not stink it up was the little boy and played by vincent berry. the only reason why i even give it negative is because it gave me something to do. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"instead and go to the zoo and buy some peanuts and feed em to the monkeys. monkeys are funny. people with amnesia who do not say much and just sit there with vacant eyes are not all that funny. black comedy. there isn not a black person in it and and there isn not one funny thing in it either. walmart buys these things up somehow and puts them on their dollar rack. it labeled unrated. i think they took out the topless scene. they may have taken out other stuff too and who knows. all we know is that whatever they took out and isn not there any more. the acting seemed ok to me. there a lot of unfathomables tho. it supposed to be a city. it supposed to be a big lake. if it so hot in the church people are fanning themselves and why are they all wearing coats. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i had quite high hopes for this film and even though it got a bad review in the paper. i was extremely tolerant and and sat through the entire film. i felt quite sick by the end. although i am not in the least prude or particularly sensitive to tasteless cinema i thouroughly enjoyed both woody allen everything you ever wanted to know about sex and . and michael hanneke funny games i found the directors obsession with this ten year old wanting to drink women milk totally sickening. and when the film climaxed in an orgy where the boy drinks both his mother milk and as well as that of the woman he has been lusting after for the whole film and i almost vomited with disgust for the total perversion and sentimental pap that it is. don not get me wrong and i enjoy the vast majority of european cinema and as well as independently made films and so this flick should have pleased me enormously. avoid this film at all costs and it should be relegated to the annals of history as a lesson in bad cinema. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"plan b is strictly by the numbers fare except for one thing. i surprisingly found it to be rather insulting. jon cryer is the star of this film and plays his usual and smarmy and egotistical and snotty character that was actually endearing in pretty in pink and has not been amusing ever since. grating doesn not even begin to describe his performance. ricky (mark matheisen) is a muscular and blonde and struggling actor who (gasp. ) is only worried about his hair and getting laid. talk about a stock character. ugh. at least the other three characters are somewhat engaging. lisa darr and lance guest play a grounded and optimistic and caring couple who are struggling to conceive. since they are not whiny drama queens and however and their roles are apparently considered boring and they aren not given enough screen time. sara mornell rounds out the cast by playing gina and your usual nice and good looking young woman who just can not seem to find the right partner in love. i have seen this character a million times before but at least her performance overcomes some of the shortfalls caused by the predictability of her situation. what startled me about this film was its juvenile promotion of stereotypes. they introduced a russian character for the sole purpose of mocking him and making fun of the way he talked. he was portrayed as being wild and ignorant and amazingly shallow. they were just getting warmed up though for the usual nonsense about gays. gina decides to be gay for a while since she isn not having any luck with guys. honestly. that wasn not that bad except they really went overboard when gina brought a lesbian to a christmas party her friends were throwing. her lesbian date had very short hair (like i am sure all lesbians do). she also got quite upset (like i am sure all lesbians do) when gina had the nerve to put on lipstick(. ). finally and her date goes around the party hitting on just about every woman there and mouths off when gina expresses her disappointment. of course and we all know how gay people can not stay faithful for so much as a couple of hours much less months or even years and right. (please note the sarcasm in that statement. thank you. )this film was based on a tired and predictable premise to begin with but cryer unlikable performance combined with the idiotic stereotyping sinks this movie to the lower depths of cinema. negative . "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"i had the misfortune to sit through the full 102 minutes of what and in my opinion and is this shockingly bad film. it fails on pretty much all levels while the cast is awful and the acting ham at best and the plot lacks any depth and leaving me feeling violently apathetic as to the outcome of any of the convoluted story lines. plan b has none of the charm this genre has the scope to convey and i found myself physically cringing at the various points where the script makes its regular misjudged meanderings anywhere towards the region of comedy. a bona fide saccharine coated turd of a movie. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Please analyze the following IMDB review:
"even though there a repertoire of over 180 films to choose from and this succubus is often named as the best jess franco film. heck and even the legendary filmmaker fritz lang counts succubus among his personal favorites. so and maybe it me but i thought this was a dreadfully boring and overly confusing movie. the opening is great and though and and shows janine reynaud performing an sm act on stage. it all downhill from here and unfortunately. reynaud character is a maneater who eventually kills her lovers in some sort of trance. franco had a decent budget to work with and spends it well on nice locations and beautiful photography and a mesmerizing musical score. this could have been his greatest film indeed and if it wasn not for the lame and uninteresting story. it supposed to be psychedelic but i would say sophomoric is a better term to describe what shown here. half of the time and you do not have a clue what going on or what exactly is said so even the short running time of 80 minutes seems to last ages. this most certainly isn not franco best film according to me. i do not even recommend it to die hard exploitation fans. if youre looking for more superior jess franco film and try to get your hands on las vampiras and the awful dr. orloff or female vampire. "
You might take into account that star ratings and expressions like "xx out of" or "/10" are very important. Generally, ratings greater than half are considered positive(This label may not exist, so it's not necessary). If the sentiment of the review is positive, reply with 1; if the sentiment of the review is negative, reply with 0. Do not provide any additional comments, just reply with 1 or 0.
| 0 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.