text
stringlengths 9
5k
| labels
sequence | __index_level_0__
int64 160k
224k
|
|---|---|---|
Kinsey's methods are called into question by some, but the impact of his study is actually listed by a few sources as a groundbreaking change in perception about sexuality, and I seriously considered including it in the article. Hooker's study specifically asked men about their own self-satisfaction and happiness. I get your point - at least I think I do, but Hooker's work is cited regularly as the beginning of a change in ideas about homosexuality. I'm reflecting Hooker's work with due weight since it is mentioned by the sources I read. I'll be happy to take ideas about wording and syntax, though. | [] | 159,789 |
":::Thank God I'm an atheist.
" | [] | 159,790 |
This message is regarding the page Original position. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. | [] | 159,791 |
"
::Alright. Thank you. — , " | [] | 159,792 |
"I removed the section ""richest/best educated zip code"". I didn't understand what it meant how can Waban be the richest/best educated zip code without being the richest? Also, how do we define ""best educated""? I looked at the census data for 02468, and there are lots of statistics that might mean ""best educated"" largest fraction with bachelor's degrees, smallest fraction of high school dropouts, etc.
I'd be glad to see this section come back if someone could sharpen it to some verifiable fact, and provide a reference. It would be very interesting if it were true that, for instance, Waban has a higher fraction of people with graduate degrees than any other zip code.
The census bureau page for Waban is at
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=86000US02468&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_DP2&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-_lang=en&-_sse=on
" | [] | 159,793 |
"
== Did the jury understand that they did not have to impose the death penalty? ==
Juror #3 said, ""But it's someone else's life, and if I'm wrong and I kill someone else I can't live with that."" The suggests that the jury may have held a misunderstanding. In Florida, a jury is able to recommended a life sentence instead of death. A reporter on AC360 had a similar impression, saying, ""Did the jury really understand their role?"" and suggested the judge may have been at fault. This alone may not warrant inclusion in the article, but more substantive references to this issue may be out there.
:It would probably be OR to make such an assertion right now based on that statement. More indepth interviews may take place in the future.
:::This should have been a bench trial. The jurors clearly did not understand the law. It is complicated in a circumstantial case. I also think that a death penalty case is always a difficult case for jurors to decide.
::::Trial by jury is a right; given the facts of this case and the prosecution putting the death penalty on the table, it would have been foolish for the defense team to ask for a bench trial.
:::::That is not what I meant. If my life were hanging in the balance, I would much rather put it in the hands of a judge. This should never have been a death penalty case. Not enough evidence to meet the criteria. A jury is too unpredictable. Most of the time, the defense team thinks about how much money they will make and the publicity they will get - which is also about money, and lastly, they think about the defendant. To the prosecution and the judge, it is about the truth and the proof. Of course the defense team would not want a bench trial.
::::::It would be best if we stay on topic then as our common goal here is to improve the article; opinions that you'd rather face a judge yourself, or that the jurors didn't understand the law in this case, or that most defense lawyers put their clients last to focus on fame while for prosecutors its about ""the truth"" isn't constructive on article talk pages. However, there are lots of forums on other sites that would welcome commentary. Back to Xerxesnine's point, perhaps relevant material will show up in the near future. Regards,
:::::::Both of us were engaged in speculation Xerxesnine's point is just as speculative and mine. Both of us have made several suggestions if you will look over this page. All of us, including youself should take your advice.
::::::::Excellent - I'm glad you agree and appreciate that you're going to work on that. Regards,
Is there a Florida law that could counter the verdict (guilty, not guilty) if it is found that the jurors did not follow the jury instructions? On Nancy Grace there was mention of ""jury fraud""; the only example given was that if it was proven that their decision was based on what the bible says is right/wrong. Jennifer Ford clearly didn't understand that this was the ""guilt phase"" and not the ""penalty phase""; furthermore, there were plenty of other degree-options surrounding the murder charge that would not have inflicted the death penalty for which she couldn't live with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by
:With all due respect to Nancy Grace, there isn't a chance in H*** that will happen. The law of Double Jeopardy will prevent her of ever being criminally tried to these offences again. She could be sued in civil court for wrongful death for money (like OJ was) but her parents seem to be delighted that she was found not guilty so I doubt that would happen. I know this is speculation and will probably be told about it, but I think this may not be the last time Casey Anthony will commit a crime. ([[User talk:Mugginsx | [] | 159,794 |
where I feel like a man instead of an idiot | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | 159,795 |
==An alternative to spamming talk pages==
Actually WP:RM is on my watchlist. A less antisocial alternative to spamming some thirty user talk pages (as you appear to have done), also one that is less likely to get you accused of trying to stack a vote, is to place a notice on the hot topic watchlist. | | [] | 159,796 |
As pointed out on Math Overflow (http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11774/difference-between-equivalence-relations-on-algebraic-cycles), the definition of algebraic equivalence is not correct. | [] | 159,798 |
"
: Maybe one of these days. Cool random quote, by the way, at . ""like ""you fucking breeders, why don't you fuck your OWN sex?""""" | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | 159,799 |
Will be editing the Andraka page
Please considering registering so your contributions can be noted, and so you can better enter into this discussion as it develops. Le Prof | [] | 159,800 |
Who is the man in the high castle? | [] | 159,801 |
The true truth is that only my balls have official status in the Principality of Monaco. Stupid.
Warm, musky regards,
His Most Serene Highness Prince Scruffy Musky Coinpurse IV | [
"toxic"
] | 159,802 |
"
:In traditional Basque usage, Guipuscoa was the provincia: Check Philotea from 1821:
::Topatuco dute bear bada Provinciaco eusquerarequin batian Nafarroacoa, Vizcayacoa ta Arabacoa,
::""They will find maybe along the Basque language of the Province [i.e. Guipuscoa] that of Navarre, Biscay and Alava"".
:However, as you say, the Ley de Territorios Históricos created this new category, for reasons unknown to me.
: " | [] | 159,804 |
" *It actually matters very little whether the project members are coordinating to combat what they perceive as a ""liberal bias"", or simply coordinating to push a right-wing POV. The practical result is the same: this project organizes editors along specific ideological grounds, and coordinates their efforts to advance that ideology. A WikiProject which explicitly organizes editors by partisan political ideology, while not categorically forbidden, has an immense potential for abuse. Not only have project members failed to address that potential constructively and proactively, but they've consistently and stridently refused to believe that any such potential for abuse exists.The more Wikipedians observe this project in action, the more expressions of concern (like those above) you're going to receive - because the way this project currently functions is inimical to Wikipedia's policies and best practices, and there appears to be zero desire on the part of active project members to grapple with good-faith concerns. Instead, in keeping with the general battleground mentality embodied in this project, the response has been to bunker down, circle the wagons, and hit back aggressively at any concerns that are voiced. ''' " | [] | 159,805 |
"
:You can't just say, ""that's crap"" and remove it without gaining a consensus. You already know this, based on your block history. —/ " | [] | 159,806 |
I don't see the purpose for including Prather's comments on his personal behavior. This has no place in an encyclopedic article. It is disappointing to see this in wikipedia, just as it would be disappointing to find in the Islam entry comments from a muslim cleric stating that practising Islam made him act violently and destructively. People are responsible for their behavior, not religions or philosophies. | [] | 159,807 |
If ya not... still fu*k u | [
"toxic",
"profane"
] | 159,808 |
"
==Problem with Millenium Shakespeare article==
The title of the article is misspelled indeed, but as a new user I couldn't edit it myself, neither redirect the older article with the correct name to lead to the new version of the text. I would appreciate any hints on how to deal with that. Also, I don't see where is the conflist of interest in the article. Give me some hints. Thanks!
==The Sickness (on Lost)==
I mentioned it on my message that you left, and think we should put it on the DISCUSSION page for anyone else to chime in on. As said in that previous message, I think that in fictional cases, we have more leeway to speculate on stuff, especialy when we are talking about LOST where answers are few and far between and often provide us asking more questions.
==Randall Flagg==
Take out the picture of King instead. A picture of the character seems more relevant than his creator, especially seeing that as of now, there are two images of him from the books, two from TV, one of King, and none from the comics.
:My image qualm doesn't stop with Palpatine and Jabba. Those are older FAs that were established before the rigorous overhaul of fair use images in articles. Per the actual criteria, you need to have something about the image beyond simple identification (the only exclusion to that is the infobox image). My fear with the article in FAC is that criticism will arise about how influential this character is King's novels, yet how slim the article is on information about him. If you feel it is ready, then go for it. The worst that can happen is that it is not promoted, in which case you will most likely have a lot more eyes telling you what you can do to improve it, thus making it that much better. There is no draw back to not getting promoted other than not getting that little bronze star. D
== Great work! ==
Hey, I just wanted to commend you on the excellent catch you made in the “Alice in Wonderland” AfD discussion – based on the new source you presented, I switched my vote to Keep. Great work!
has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.
== Dark Tower WP discussion ==
Greetings Dark Tower WikiProject member, I would like to invite you to palaver about a possible expansion of the Dark Tower Project to include all Stephen King related items. I feel that the large amount of projects related to the author warrants his own Project—but as this one already exists—hesitate to begin a new one. Please feel free to leave comments of any kind and be assured that The Dark Tower will be held in the highest regard within the new King Project. Long days and pleasant nights.
== Saw traps ==
From what I remember of the list, it was just that a list of the traps. There wasn't much there but original research and personal observation about each of the traps - which is probably why it got deleted, and rightly so. If there was real content there, then that's another story, but I doubt that content couldn't be found on the individual film pages. But, if you feel that it was wrongly deleted, then I'd go to the deletion review page and start the discussion. Maybe the closing Admin was a little hasty in his decision making. [[User:Bignole|''' | [] | 159,809 |
I had changed the SS Template. It's all finished and all right, now! | [] | 159,810 |
He really is pro-criminal. Not a nice guy. | [] | 159,811 |
"
:Welcome to hell. Check your self-respect at the door. | " | [] | 159,812 |
no hes not he have his own show whihc is a cheap copy of ragu romeo show and hes only popular because of stupid people who auditions and watch this gutter show | [
"toxic"
] | 159,813 |
"
:I agree. 150,000,000 is ridiculous, that would be half of all ""Arabs"" " | [] | 159,814 |
::It has been talked about here and here. Cheers | [] | 159,815 |
When we get is they expect it to fade away. Well with the gear they're releasing they're not helping their own cause are they? | [] | 159,816 |
== The Grotty Knackers CSD ==
Hi. I removed your CSD tag from The Grotty Knackers since the article doesn't seem to be vandalism: that requires a deliberate intention to harm the encyclopaedia, which I don't see here. The article's obviously a misplaced addition, but I think it's important not to use the word 'vandal' loosely. I replaced the tag with a PROD, and then belatedly realised that A7 applies so added that instead. Cheers, | [] | 159,818 |
== Apartheid is Affirmative Action ==
Well the whites were outnumber 1 to 11, so I guess one could argue that they were just making up for that. | [] | 159,819 |
If that's a wig, he's been swindled! Poliakoff | [] | 159,820 |
"
:Oppose Current title is more suitable per , and most source doesn't use a capital ""C"" , , . Plus you also have frequently made unfinished controversial page moved by redirecting template to article such as what you have done in here and here along with which lead you been blocked twice. " | [] | 159,821 |
It's been nearly a week and there's been no objections; I've stuck up the merge templates. What is the consensus on this then? Same reasons as listed above. '''''' | [] | 159,822 |
== Iqbal and the West, Image ==
@ Nolelover, Use common sense to understand the CN template purpose, before involving into Edit warring by reverting, plz ask for the specification if you of don't understand the purpose of edit].
, Germany.]]
This image not only gives the name of street: but also claims that there is a street in Heidelberg, Germany which was Honored in the name of M. Iqbal.
and if you understand that for every claim, we need to provide the source, either provide the reliable source for this claim or place back the CN template Or give the valid reason why there should not be any source for this claim. | [] | 159,823 |
":Yeah, but rolling isn't really the topic here, which although ill-defined in the lead, seems to be ""Rotatory propulsive systems in living organisms"". Having the whole organism rotate is outside that scope.
" | [] | 159,824 |
"
::I've removed the frivolous criticism section. " | [] | 159,825 |
:::1. There are THREEE reasons given: I even numbered them for the hard of understanding. 2. There was no abuse in my edit summary, or in my statement above. 3. I am not sure how you. Are trying for the moral high ground and then start snidey comments, and what the hell either of my late grandfathers have to do with this, or you, is beyond me, and rates as possibly the most childish comment I've seen on Wiki for a while. - | [] | 159,826 |
:Quite a while ago I had a nice book about the early history of rock and roll and it has a lot of content about Berry. I can't remember any details bout the book. I lost it in an airport somewhere long before I ever finished reading it. I wish I could remember what the actual title was. It was a bookstore clearance sale pick-up. I lose reading material in airports and on planes all the time. When you get a chance could you look at an edit to Jimmy Page. A editor who has been tagged as a sock of a blocked account keeps removing a string of sentences which appear to have several valid citations. (See this last edit ) The editor was blocked for breaking 3RR. The person posted a reason on the talk page for the content blanking. But their reason just seems to say it was OK for them to delete the referenced text because another user said it was OK to do so. To me it just looks like an anti-Jimmy Page opinion edit and not an edit to help improve the page. Could you look? I think the edit should be reverted. But the other day I noticed similar content removal and odd section altering so I reverted the back back to a version by Y2Kcrazyjoker as that appeared to be the last version that was stable. But I look today and see my edit was reverted by this tagged account and the edit summary claims my edit was some sort of sockpuppet edit. You can read the edit summary. To me it is very unclear. If you feel that person is up to something and revert his blanking I would be curious as to what names he chooses to call you? If I find a good Chuck Berry book in my travels I will post you. Perhaps I can help you get that article into better shape. Cheers and take care! | [] | 159,827 |
"
==Wikiproject Automobiles Notification==
Hi Bok269, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.
To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Bok269]] to your userpage.
If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, | " | [] | 159,828 |
Seems like the history section is a bit big and focuses on, well, the Late Show as a franchise rather than the late show with Stephen Colbert. Not suggesting necesarily removing it because it will be appropriate in scale to the article in 9 or 10 months and assumedly will fill out more appropriate details then. | [] | 159,829 |
:As a general rule, i dont think that ANY of the parodies of celebs in shows like family guy, simpsons, etc. deserve mention. If she was a recurring character, yes. highly notable celebrities routinely get mentioned everywhere. Obscure ones, the parodies are more notable. its like mentioning every time wood appears in popular culture, or the sun.(mercurywoodrose) | [] | 159,830 |
)
:Nice to meet you BluJay! What type of articles do you like editing? (UTC | [] | 159,831 |
:Note the history section in the Hominoidea article. - | [] | 159,832 |
Well honestly I cant be fucking bothered tonight. So sleep wee all u editors ans admits . I'm off to bed. CU anaon | [] | 159,833 |
casualt i fucked your mum and i liked it !!ies | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | 159,834 |
Keep in find, complete lies are still non-fiction, if that is the format they present themselves in. Hitler's propaganda was non-fiction, in that it was not a work of imagination. Instead, it was untrue, but still had a non-fiction format. The reason it was untrue was not because it was imagined, but instead it was because it was a product of misinformation, ignorance, and what is largely considered evil. | [] | 159,835 |
.
:::What makes you think being old is going to help stop a smoking addiction? Vonnegut attended self-help classes and actually did quit smoking for a while, but has since then decided to start again | [] | 159,836 |
== ==
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding and - you have been reverting vandalism from the latest in a long line of sockpuppets from Alex Cain, who is currently blocked for one week for his conduct. Thanks. - | [] | 159,837 |
", 28 January 2014 (UTC)
The Allvoices.com article cited here is unreliable simply because it was taken from here, a well-known pro-terrorist activist agit-prop website, one of that who some hypocrite users here would define as ""neutral tone"" and ""balanced"" (they really believe their own lies?). I understand that its hard to some seeing their beloved ""revolutionaries"" loosing ground everyday, but thats not a reason for trying to make us accept non-journalist activist partisan sources while censoring other journalistic sources, and even trying to decide wich articles are accepted as reliable sources and wich not, when they are posted by the same publisher!!! And finally, and sorry for putting it in caps, WIKIPEDIA TALK PAGES ARE NOT FORUMS SO STOP IT RIGHT NOW! 23:02" | [] | 159,839 |
:::*That would be OR by prevailing standards, yes, though secondary sources that establish the history of the concept and talk about the existence of it prior to there being a name for it might be usable to bridge the gap. What you'd need, ultimately, is a source that gives a good account of trans history across various changes to how it's been pathologized by the medical community. Once you have that and have used it to create a historical spine for the article you would be on better footing fleshing out any given moment of history. | [] | 159,841 |
Why is it a racist saying Pot calling the kettle black | [] | 159,842 |
==December 2008==
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | [] | 159,843 |
I welcome discussion on this page regarding my changes or contributions to Wikipedia. Please add categories as you see fit; I will reorganize the page periodically as needed.
== Greetings from fellow Wikipedians == | [] | 159,844 |
X-BOX 360 SUKCS BIG BUMM AND LIKES IT UP THE ASS | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | 159,845 |
A bit POV don't you think? | [] | 159,846 |
==DYK nomination of Torleiv Anda==
Hello! Your submission of Torleiv Anda at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! | [] | 159,847 |
:::Thanks. I haven't left him or her a message and at this point it would probably be better if someone else did so it doesn't seem like I'm trying to antagonize him or her. | [] | 159,849 |
Karl Tearle is a mop haired twat | [
"toxic",
"insult"
] | 159,850 |
they still shouldnt kill a women for a reason like that christains are soppose to be good people. | [] | 159,851 |
"
::Think you're missing the point. ""David and Goliath"" as is commonly used in the English language refers to the Biblical legend. The clothing store should be a disambiguation link in the main article. - " | [] | 159,852 |
::Btw, it is amazing how looks like a tax return form in the US, they assume that everybody is retarded. | [] | 159,853 |
"
== Thank you ==
James, thank you for reverting that horrible vandalism from my user page. " | [] | 159,854 |
"
::I don't think he belongs in this category - of course, he believed that the world was created by God - that much is obvious. But so does an overwhelming majority of Orthodox Jews - that doesn't mean that every Orthodox Jew who has an article should be in this category. I think that only people who are publicly (and specifically) outspoken about the issue of creation vs. evolution. I don't think the Rebbe was known for that. " | [] | 159,855 |
", 26 November 2005 (UTC)
:::Well, Permyakia and Perm Oblast have established economic ties and a lot of common infrastructure—that's one of the main reasons. Also, Permyakia is heavily dotational, relying on the federal transfers to form a significant portion of its budget. Problem is, federal government is not always good with transferring funds timely, which, as you imagine, creates all sorts of issues. Perm Oblast, on the other hand, is a donor, and once both budgets are merged, it will ease the pain somewhat (but note that during 2006 there will still be two separate budgets, so there will be a transitional period). Another thing—Permyakia will still have a special status within new Perm Krai. The main scoop is that Permyakia will no longer need to rely on federal government's transfers (but will, of course, become dependent of Perm Krai's budget), and Perm Oblast will gain access to Permyakia's resources. The merger also lowers administrative costs—instead of two local governments there will only be one. Considering that Russians and Komi-Permyaks co-existed peacefully for quite some time, there is something in this merger for both parties.
:::In 2003, a poll of 309 people was conducted among the population of both oblast and autonomous district. The most common pro-merger responses were ""because together is better"" (21%), ""because the common budget will create better opportunities for the territories' development"" (19%), ""because the government will be able to build new bridges and roads"" (15%), and ""because there will be a reduction in the number of government workers"" (12%)— 15:43" | [] | 159,856 |
:I've asked to discuss removals of information first. I will need to remind him. | | [] | 159,857 |
== I'd like your view on a conflict of interest question ==
I'd like your view on a conflict of interest question I've raised, since you're deeply involved in some of the pages / subjects that we'd be linking from. Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Workplace_COI_questions | [] | 159,858 |
==Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC this Saturday Dec 1==
in NYC]]
You are invited to Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and workshops focused on film and the performing arts that will be held on Saturday, December 1, 2012, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.
All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and at meetup.com! | [] | 159,859 |
Schmidt was just the best-funded advisor on privatisation methods in Estonia. Treuhand Ost-Beratung financed e.g. Finnish-numbered fax machines and other support. USAID and the EU PHARE project provided counterbalancing advice which took into account the voucher system that had been instituted in Estonia, which was alien to Schmidt's German experience. Indeed, in opposing the first public offerings for shares, in the manner of Margaret Thatcher's government in Britain, Schmidt commented that such methods equated to the reintroduction of communism. When majority stakes were sold in former state enterprises according to the classic German method, especially to entities associated with the state enterprises' managers, questions were asked as to whether the majority shareholders were unduly profiting by not treating their part-subsidiaries at arm's length. Schmidt should not be credited with the mixed method of privatisation instituted in Estonia. | [] | 159,860 |
I love you more talebs * cge go, sabot namu for 2mrw talebs. | [] | 159,861 |
I said is going to be a longgggg one!!!! | [] | 159,862 |
"
I really think you are worrying unnecessarily about it. I just happened to come across the article and found a huge close up of her face which was overpixated. Think what you like and do what you like if you disagree. " | [] | 159,863 |
== Note: 1 & 2 Copied from Talk:Airbus G-EUPC ==
==1. Comments==
New page created, feel free to add or edit.
:wHILST I would dearly love to see this page blossom, I cannot seem to be able to justify it. I feel that the subject should have no more mention than a parqagraph in an article on the 2012 Games as a whole. Having said that I amhoping that I spark a discussion that will enable the coorect path to be chosen. P.S. my ex-wife is going to be one of the torch-bearers!!
::Actually I kinda agree. Let's leave here for a few days and then see what LOCOG use the plane for next! If it disappears back into the BA schedules perhaps I should move the whole page to WikiNews??
:::On further reflection I have moved most of the non-aviation material to a new section of 2012 Summer Olympics torch relay.
== 2. Deletion request ==
wrote concern = Not notable outside of the 2012 Summer Olympics torch relay, failing WP:GNG and WP:ONEEVENT. Any useful information can be merged there (which most of it is already). No real need for a redirect as it is an unlikely search term.
:However she/he did not put any discussion on this page to discuss this deletion first. reveals s/he has a tendency to delete articles without a full discussion on appropriate pages and wikiprojects eg Wikipedia:AVIA. Her/his reasons for deletion may be valid but please let's have an informed discussion first.
::Wikipedia has several modern aircraft used for specific purposes, eg VC-137C SAM 26000 in the USA. These specially painted Airbus aircraft will have several purposes during the Summer Olympics, not just the arrival of the Olympic Torch. Can we wait a bit before Speedy Deletion? Perhaps widen scope of article to include all 9 Airbus aircraft with livery designed by Pascal Anson.
:::Lidos, as I (just) mentioned on your talk page, the WP:PROD process does not require discussion (and is completely different from the Speed Deletion process. There was nothing wrong my actions, nor was any offensive intended towards you nor an attempt to circumvent any discussion. lease review what PROD means before making further allegations. If you think an article deserves a deletion discussion (aka an WP:AFD process), whether or not you believe the article should (or would/will) be deleted it is perfectly acceptable to remove the PROD tag without comment (though preferably a reason should be given.). Finally, I do not agree that the article (even if expanded in scope) will ever meet WP:GNG and intend to bring the article to WP:AFD. | [] | 159,864 |
GIVE BLOWJOBS TO HOT WOMEN FROM ALDERLEY EDGE, CHESHIRE | [
"toxic",
"profane"
] | 159,865 |
: If this continues I will likely be requesting article protection, due to persistent IP-vandalism. | [] | 159,866 |
== Suggested deletion of the article by ==
It seems suddenly decided to delete all Seventh Framework Programme projects articles, using the same copy-paste arguments: Ephemeral project. No independent sources, no indication of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG.
The CyberEmotions project is one of the major projects of the 7th Framework Programme in terms of financial funding, as well as in terms of duration, number of research teams involved, and multidisciplinarity of these teams. If this article is deleted, so should be for instance FINNOV, DARIAH, or EGAIS. Five Wikipedia articles about emotions and the Internet link to CyberEmotions. The reason for this is the importance of studying collective phenomena on the internet to prevent negative events, with repercussion both inside and outside of the online world. This is one of the purpose of CyberEmotions.
Furthermore, the notability of the project is already partially demonstrated in the Research section. A series of references to high quality peer-reviewed journals are made (e.g., Physica), in a brief summary of some of the findings of the project so far.
This Wikipedia article will be improved, and its relevance and notability for understanding collective phenomena on the Internet will be clearly demonstrated. | [] | 159,867 |
:Is your sockpuppet. if so, stop using using it now and forever. Using 2 identities in the way you appear to be is not acceptable behaviour at wikipedia, | [] | 159,869 |
==Carnatic music & Bharatnatyam==
Nilakana Sastri's book on Cholas (published in 1955) has section on their temple culture that was a precursor to Carnatic Music and Bharatanatyam. You should get it, if you already do not have it. Also the K. Indrapala's Evolution of an ethnic identity... puts it together as to how Chola Art forms directly lead to Bharatanatyam forms in sculptures in Sri Lanka. Indrapal quotes Nilakanta Sastri extensively. | [] | 159,870 |
"
::::: That's enough of this ""incompetence"" bullshit from you and Jtydog. DrChrissy might get upset at times, but there is nothing incompetent about him. He seems to have made a slip and meant 6 years instead of 16 years, that's all. What the RfC was about seemed quite clear to me. The waters have been muddied again and again by others.
" | [] | 159,872 |
: I would not call this propoganda when there is so much evidence to support the claims made. Some people DO research before adding material! Hence, | [] | 159,873 |
:Doing no harm is not a reason to include the links, and being useful is not a reason to include the links. We err on the side of not including links in these situations. The main reasoning that keeps coming forward about including the links seems to be WP:ILIKEIT and [[:WP:USEFUL]. But after getting several neutral admins to contribute to the discussion, the huge majority agree that keeping these links is inappropriate. Unless someone comes up with some new, compelling reason why these links should be included, we all need to move on to something more productive (IMO). | [] | 159,874 |
::::We're going to have a bot go through the B class category and paste in the checklist to our banner which should prevent the loss of B class when you make the changes. I believe this should work unless you think otherwise. This will likely take a few days to complete so will let you know when that is complete. | [] | 159,875 |
== Sorry ==
Misclicked there and ec'd with you undoing. | [] | 159,876 |
"
==Wikipedia Day Celebration and Mini-Conference in NYC Saturday Feb 23==
"" thing at one of our earlier NYC Wiki-Conferences.]]
You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 12th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Saturday February 23, 2013 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here, or at bit.ly/wikidaynyu. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the ""open space"" experience! " | [] | 159,877 |
I think you should delete the whole fuckin' Wikipedia! | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | 159,878 |
"
: Keep it. Unless you would like to use (semi)official termimology from last years of socialist Czechoslovakia: ""advanced Western countries"".
" | [] | 159,879 |
|living= y|class=stub |a&e-work-group;=yes |listas= Goldsworthy, Vesna | [] | 159,880 |
:Cocks. I'm confused now. It is fully protected until 5th December at the moment. Registered users are 'crystal ball' editing it, but not actually vandalising it. Are you on IRC? I cannot see you. Do you think it needs taking down to a day or two? I am going to take it down to two days of full again. It will look messy, but to hell with it. | [] | 159,881 |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Rhodesian blacks have voting rights? | [] | 159,882 |
"
==Social Status = Number of Edits==
Who engineered this perverse subculture? It had to be either Mayor McCheese or Barney the Dinosaur. Or maybe it just evolved after everyone with even a shred of intellect was run off by an angry mob of self-proclaimed ""editors."" Wikipedia is like a mental hospital run by the inmates. - " | [] | 159,883 |
::there was(circa1990 last time i checked it was there) a plaque on that corner that says 0km as is was the starting point for all distance measurements from Perth. | [] | 159,884 |
"
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
*The five pillars of Wikipedia
*How to edit a page
*Help pages
*Tutorial
*How to write a great article
*Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! e () " | [] | 159,885 |
:::Thanks Ryan and Worm. It didn't occur to me to check the later editing history to see if anyone had said where it came from. I have now merged the sandbox history into the article. | [] | 159,886 |
== Thank you! ==
Hi PKM, I'm not sure if this is appropriate given I'm such a Wikipedia newb but I just wanted to thank you for the welcome. I appreciate it!! | [] | 159,887 |
== French Revolution Causes ==
1. Old Regime: The Three Estates
First Estate Church owned 10 percent land paid 2 percent in taxes
Second Estate Nobles owned 20 percent of land and paid 1 percent taxes
Third Estate 98 percent of population working class merchants paid half to taxes
The third Estate was out numbered in voting and wanted to have voting with population so everyone was counted
they were exploited
2. Economic Problems
Population Growth
Business could not make money because of high taxes
Bad Weather Drought led to famine poor crops
The price of bread doubled too expensive for third estate and it was the main source of food
3.Weak Leader
Lois XVI spent too much money borrowed to help America defeat Britain
Indecisive
Did not want to govern his country
4.Marie Antoinette
Spent Millions
5.Enlightenment
Inspired peasants to revolt
6.American Revolution
Inspired peasants served as a model of freedom
7.Dept
Desperation Bad Economy
-RjR | [] | 159,888 |
Not my intention to accuse you of anything. Apologies if I came across like this. The correct spelling is however is one word 'Moulvibazar'. I know this as I was born there, it is in all official documents, going back 37+ years. I don't know where this archaic Maulvi bazar spelling comes from but this has caused a lot of pain personally, i.e. bank address, account detail mismatch. I am on mission to correct it here and elsewhere.
I wanted to rename this page and remove the redirect (possibly redirect from here to correct one). But unfortunately I don't know the know-how or have the right privilege. May be you can help me here. | [] | 159,889 |
"== Update ==
Tell Tyrone to check his messages. A representative of the Wikimedia Foundation has made an attempt to contact Stephen Colbert through his staff. In the meantime, I'm still gathering more information about the specific linking issue. (Lee)
:That's an edit summary in an admin's block log, not a message sent to anyone in any official capacity contrary to popular opinion, some Wikipedians do have a sense of humor. The message that was sent to him would represent an attempt to ascertain identity following an established procedure. If Colbert wants to promote his site here, all he needs to do is make a trivial effort to establish his identity to the Foundation, which is already seeking to contact him as we speak. Not that I have anything to do with this, but I thought I might alert you to a simple way around this. (Lee)
:Sheeh. I apologize for not being more clear. I didn't exactly expect you to go searching through miscellaneous site logs when I mentioned that someone from the Foundation was attempting to contact Colbert. The Wikimedia Fountation is, just to clear, the non-profit organization that handles Wikipedia's business and legal affairs. They're seeking to contact him, actually, over events related to the previous night's ""Wikiality"" discussion on the Report this is something I heard through the grapevine and not anything I know much about but I thought perhaps that if this site is indeed a scrappy little underdog of a marketing campaign for book whick Colbert considers his baby, he or a representative might want to bother to have a fifteen minute discussion which would allow tek-related information to happily coexist with Wikipedia's policies. He doesn't have to do anything he doesn't want to, but since the folks at the tekjansen site seem to be somewhat preoccupied with the status of a single link here and have us listed as their top referrer, despite the link being down half the time I thought the option might be of interest. No, huh? (Lee)
:Re-read the above. I did not say they had to falsify the list in order for Wikipedia to be the top referrer. I suggested a brief phone conversation might be worth the trouble if we're generating the bulk of their traffic and they're looking to promote. Take a deep breath.
:I also did not say Colbert has to verify his identity in any way. However, since the site seems to fail several points of our linking policy, yes, the site is likely to be removed without additional information being provided. I'm sorry, but the ""it's relevant anyway"" angle is fairly weak; the only reason this material would be an especially relevant resource on Colert would be if it was actually Colbert's writing. It does not have information on anything relevant to Stephen's biography. Generally speaking, we don't count fan forums as an invaluable, unique resource see WP:EL. That leaves the book, which, while possibly being Colbert's, is irrelevant if it's not. I could write a novel about Charlene and post in on my website, and that would also not be relevant. Or a novel about Stephen Colbert for that matter. In any case, I'm sorry that for some reason I seem to have pissed you off. I have no idea why you're so angry about this, but I assure you again, as I have assured you before, it's nothing personal. (Lee)
My AMA request, which you seem to have found, was a private request for advice on how to handle a situation which has become somewhat tense. You are welcome to conduct a straw poll if you want I haven't followed through on that personally because I've already have openly solicited comments from editors at the Colbert talk page, and believe we already have a pretty good index of what most experienced editors think of the link. But go for it. As I have stated before, if there's a consensus to add the link, I won't remove it. I never, never, ever, not even once said that I will ""refused to allow the link unless [myself] or a Wikipedia ""official"" is contacted by someone at the Colbert Report"" so please stop misrepresenting my remarks. In the meantime, there is absolutely nothing wrong with my asking another user for help and it does not represent bypassing a regular process. You are welcome to file | [] | 159,890 |
==Graphwise article deletion==
Hello. I wrote the article for graphwise which was speedily deleted. I would like more information on why it was deleted. Graphwise is a brand new company with a unique and proprietary graphing process. The company has created something new and unique to the web, and has numerous patents on their unique creation, these patents were listed in the article. In writing the article I I made an effort to post only informative and relevant content. I would like to know what did not fit the criteria of wikipedia and what I can do to repost an article for the sites contribution to the web. Thank you in advance for any input. | [] | 159,891 |
::Yes. Search for some celebrities or fictional characters (eg, Batman, Alan Partridge, Ross Geller) and you will see for yourself. I would have wrote it myself in the article but I don't know how to word it and where to put it. | [] | 159,892 |
If you think I will refer to the matters and affairs of this War in GOOD vs. BAD, Terrorists ( spreads 'Terror and 'Mayhem'), Evil doers and 'Cute Puppies' you are mistaken. You can legitimize whatever you want, as long as you do everything else.. So yes, you will strip the news coverage you read from it's politic siding and filter the facts, because this website is not a news dump. | [] | 159,893 |
"
== Richard Etchberger article ==
I don't see an issue with adding or uploading relevant media; I found a photo of Etchberger's brother at the dedication to a memorial to him at Barksdale AFB from 2008 on defenseimagery.mil and uploaded that. The videos I would think should be PD, so by all means, go for it. There's also the video of the White House presentation ceremony and I already uploaded an .ogg of the President's remarks. " | [] | 159,894 |
==Vote for Deletion==
This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. Several voters recommended that the title be changed since the cutoff date at which things pass into the public domain in the US will change over time. | [] | 159,895 |
"
:Not nit-picky at all — it's a point very well taken. Unless anyone objects, I think we ought to remove the ""soft pastel"" reference altogther. — " | [] | 159,896 |
Subsets and Splits