|
--- |
|
license: cc-by-4.0 |
|
--- |
|
# Synthetic mass spectra dataset No. 2 |
|
This is the second iteration of the GC-EI-MS synthetic dataset generated by [NEIMS] and [RASSP] models from 4.8 million structures downloaded from [ZINC 20]. |
|
The overlap with version 1 is approximately 8k structures (negligible), so it's usable as an extension to synth1. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Spectra generators |
|
For generating this dataset, we used custom-trained NEIMS and RASSP models. We did this step because RASSP model is not publicly available and we wanted to |
|
have more control over potential dataleaks in the context of further models stemming from this dataset. For better reproducibility we make the NIST splits |
|
used for training NEIMS and RASSP models available in our [GitHub repository] (#TODO) |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset creation |
|
|
|
To uniformly cover the chemical space, we first scraped 1.8 billion SMILES strings from the ZINC20 library using the 2D-standard-annotated-druglike query. |
|
From this dataset, we extracted a random sample of 30 million noncorrupted SMILES strings shorter than 100 characters. Further, we canonicalized, deduplicated, |
|
and stripped the SMILES of stereochemical information, as stereochemistry is not reliably translated into spectra and cannot be accurately detected. |
|
Additionally, we removed all NIST 20 compounds to prevent data leakage during the testing of our trained model in the future. |
|
|
|
To evaluate the impact of RASSP and NEIMS respective spectrum prediction capabilities on SpecTUS performance, we created two identical sets of spectra generated |
|
by each model. RASSP's strict input filters reduced the dataset to approximately 4.8 million compounds. In total, the pretraining datasets comprises 4.8 million |
|
unique compounds and 9.6 million unique spectra. |
|
|
|
Lastly, we split each synthetic dataset into training, validation, and test sets using a 0.9:0.05:0.05 ratio. The splitting process was random, but corresponding splits |
|
(training, validation, and test sets) for the NEIMS and RASSP-generated spectra contained the same compounds. |
|
|
|
## Size |
|
|
|
```text |
|
rassp_custom_gen/train.jsonl 4364744 |
|
rassp_custom_gen/valid.jsonl 242486 |
|
rassp_custom_gen/test.jsonl 242486 |
|
TOTAL 4849716 |
|
|
|
neims_custom_gen/train.jsonl 4364748 |
|
neims_custom_gen/valid.jsonl 242483 |
|
neims_custom_gen/test.jsonl 242485 |
|
TOTAL 4849716 |
|
``` |
|
|
|
<!-- |
|
## Dataset choice |
|
If you're choosing between synth1 and synth2 (and don't need both), choose synth2. The origin of synth2 is better documented in the 3_datapreprocessing.ipynb notebook in our [GitHub repository], |
|
even though the creation process is in essence the same for both datasets. |
|
There are the same compound in the splits of both RASSP and NEIMS generated datasets but some |
|
duplicities emerged, so the sets are not identical (!the scale of the leak is less than 4 compounds in almost 5M set, and the test and validation sets are not used for |
|
the final testing and validation in our paper, so we call it negligible!) |
|
|
|
--> |
|
## Data format |
|
|
|
Each line of every file is a `json` comprising three items: |
|
|
|
```text |
|
{"intensity":[0.01,0.08,0.06,0.05 ... 0.02,0.79,0.34,0.12], |
|
"mz":[18,27,28,29,38,39,40,41,42,43, ... 202,203,270,271,272,299,300,301], |
|
"smiles":"CCC(C)C1CCCCN1C(=O)CNc1cccc(C#N)c1"} |
|
``` |
|
|
|
From the nature of the NEIMS spectra predictor, all NEIMS-generated peak intensities are in 2 decimals precision. RASSP generated intensities are not restricted in this way, |
|
so to save storage we rounded them up to 6 decimal places which is beyond recognition for our model in the downstream task. |
|
|
|
Our [preprint] (TODO) provides more information about the task background, the final finetuned model, and the experiments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[NEIMS]: https://github.com/brain-research/deep-molecular-massspec |
|
[RASSP]: https://github.com/thejonaslab/rassp-public |
|
[ZINC 20]: https://zinc20.docking.org/ |
|
[GitHub repository]: TODO |