ID
stringclasses 146
values | chapter
stringclasses 289
values | text
stringlengths 27
3.27k
|
|---|---|---|
The rise and fall of the dinosaurs [eBook - NC Digital -- Steve Brusatte -- 1, 2018 -- William Morrow -- 9780062490421 -- 819b642fffa68675f9e07cf3af773125 -- Anna’s Archive.11 | 9780062490452_Chapter_9.txt | By the end of the 1980s, it was undeniable that the Alvarezes were correct: an asteroid or comet did hit the planet 66 million years ago. Not only was the same iridium layer found all over the world, but other geological oddities pointing to an impact were found alongside the iridium. There was a strange type of quartz in which the mineral planes had collapsed, leaving a telltale sign of parallel bands shooting through the crystal structure. This “shocked quartz” had previously been found in only two places: the rubble of nuclear bomb tests and the inside of meteor craters, formed from the fierce shock waves of these explosive events. There were spherules and tektites—spherical or spear-shaped bullets of glass forged from the melted products of a big collision that cooled as they fell back down through the atmosphere. Tsunami deposits were discovered around the Gulf of Mexico, dating right to the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, showing that a monumental event caused monstrous earthquakes right when the quartz was being shocked and the tektites were falling. Then, as the 1990s dawned, the crater was finally found. The smoking gun. It had taken a while to find it because it was buried under millions of years of sediment in the Yucatán. The only detailed studies of the area had been carried out by oil-company geologists who kept their maps and samples locked up for many years. But there could be no doubt: the 110-mile-wide (180 km) hole buried under Mexico, called the Chicxulub crater, was dated right to the end of the Cretaceous, 66 million years ago. It is one of the largest craters on Earth, a sign of just how big the asteroid was, how catastrophic the impact. It was probably one of the biggest, perhaps the biggest asteroid to hit Earth in the last half billion years. The dinosaurs probably didn’t stand a chance. BIG DEBATES IN science—particularly those that spill out of the specialist journals and into the public eye—always attract skeptics. So it was with the asteroid theory. These dissenters couldn’t argue that there was no asteroid—the discovery of the Chicxulub crater made such a claim foolish. Instead, they contended that the asteroid was wrongly accused, an innocent bystander that just so happened to smash into the Yucatán when dinosaurs and the many other things that died out at the end of the Cretaceous—the flying pterosaurs and sea-living reptiles, the coiled ammonites, the big and diverse foram communities in the ocean, and many others—were already on their way out. At worst, the asteroid was the coup de grace that finished a holocaust nature had already started. It might seem too coincidental to take seriously—a six-mile-wide asteroid arriving exactly when thousands of species were already on their deathbed. However, unlike the flat-earthers and global-warming deniers, these skeptics had a point. When the asteroid fell from the sky, it didn’t rudely interrupt some kind of static, idyllic, lost world of the dinosaurs. |
The rise and fall of the dinosaurs [eBook - NC Digital -- Steve Brusatte -- 1, 2018 -- William Morrow -- 9780062490421 -- 819b642fffa68675f9e07cf3af773125 -- Anna’s Archive.12 | 9780062490452_Chapter_9.txt | No, it hit a planet that was in quite a bit of chaos. The big volcanoes in India that the asteroid kicked into overdrive had actually started erupting a few million years before. Temperatures were gradually getting cooler, and sea levels were fluctuating dramatically. Maybe some of these things factored into the extinction? Perhaps they were the primary culprits; maybe these longer-term environmental changes were causing dinosaurs to slowly waste away. The only way to test these ideas against each other is to look very closely at the evidence that we have—dinosaur fossils. What we have to do is track dinosaur evolution over time, to see if there are any long-term trends and see what changes occurred at or near the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, when the asteroid hit. This is where I enter the picture. From the time I first spoke with Walter Alvarez on the phone, I was hooked on the riddle of the dinosaur extinction. My addiction spiraled as I stood next to Walter in the Gubbio gorge. Then, as a graduate student I finally had a chance to make my own contribution to the debate, using one of the specialties I had developed as a young researcher: using big databases and statistics to study evolutionary trends. My venture into the extinction debate was a joint one, with my old friend Richard Butler. A few years earlier, we were bushwhacking through Polish quarries on the hunt for footprints of the very oldest dinosaurs; now in 2012 as I was starting to wrap up my PhD, we wanted to know why the descendants of these wispy ancestors disappeared over 150 million years later, after they became so phenomenally successful. The question we asked ourselves was this: how were dinosaurs changing during the 10 to 15 million years before the asteroid hit? The way we addressed it was using morphological disparity, the same metric that I used to study the very oldest dinosaurs, which quantifies the amount of anatomical diversity over time. Increasing or stable disparity during the latest Cretaceous would indicate that dinosaurs were doing rather well when the asteroid came, whereas declining disparity would suggest they were in trouble and maybe already on their way to extinction. We crunched the numbers and found some intriguing results. Most dinosaurs had relatively steady disparity during that last gasp before the impact, including the meat-eating theropods, long-necked sauropods, and small to midsize plant-eaters like the dome-skulled pachycephalosaurs. There was no sign that anything was wrong with them. But two subgroups were in the midst of a disparity decline: the horned ceratopsians like Triceratops and the duck-billed dinosaurs. These were the two main groups of large-bodied plant-eaters, which consumed enormous amounts of vegetation with their sophisticated chewing and leaf-shearing abilities. If you were standing around during the latest Cretaceous—anytime between about 80 and 66 million years ago—it was these dinosaurs that would have been most abundant, at least in North America where the fossil record of this time is best. |
The rise and fall of the dinosaurs [eBook - NC Digital -- Steve Brusatte -- 1, 2018 -- William Morrow -- 9780062490421 -- 819b642fffa68675f9e07cf3af773125 -- Anna’s Archive.13 | 9780062490452_Chapter_9.txt | They were the cows of the Cretaceous, the keystone herbivores at the base of the food chain. Around the same time we were doing our study, other researchers were examining the dinosaur extinction from other angles. Teams led by Paul Upchurch and Paul Barrett in London undertook a census of dinosaur species diversity over the course of the Mesozoic—a simple count of how many dinosaurs were alive at every given point of their reign, corrected for biases caused by the uneven quality of the fossil record. They found that dinosaurs as a whole were still very diverse at the time the asteroid hit, as numerous species were frolicking throughout not only North America but the entire planet. Curiously enough, however, the horned and duck-billed dinosaurs underwent a decline in species numbers right at the end of the Cretaceous, coincident with their decline in disparity. What would all of this have meant in real-world terms? After all, it was a curious mix: most dinosaurs doing fine, but the big plant-guzzlers showing signs of stress. This question was addressed by a clever computer modeling study by one of the new breed of highly quantitative graduate students: Jonathan Mitchell from the University of Chicago. Jon and his team built food webs for several Cretaceous dinosaur ecosystems, based on careful review of all the fossils that had been found at particular field sites—not only the dinosaurs, but everything they lived with, from crocodiles and mammals down to insects. Then they used computers to simulate what would happen if a few species were knocked out. The result was startling: those food webs that existed when the asteroid struck, which had fewer large herbivores at their bases because of the diversity decline, collapsed easier than the more diverse food webs from only a few million years before the impact. In other words, the loss of some of the big herbivores, even without the decline of any of the other dinosaurs, made end-Cretaceous ecosystems highly vulnerable. Statistical analyses and computer simulations are all well and good, and there’s no doubt that they are the future of dinosaur research, but they can be a little abstract, and sometimes it’s useful to simplify things. In paleontology, that means going back to the fossils themselves: holding them in your hands and thinking deeply about them as living, breathing animals, considering them as the very animals that first had to cope with those Late Cretaceous volcanic eruptions and temperature and sea-level shifts, then later stare down an asteroid the size of a mountain. What we really want to study are the fossils of those last surviving dinosaurs, the ones that witnessed or came close to witnessing the asteroid do its dirty work. Unfortunately, there are only a few places in the world that preserve these types of fossils—but they are starting to tell a convincing story. The most famous place, without doubt, is Hell Creek. |
The rise and fall of the dinosaurs [eBook - NC Digital -- Steve Brusatte -- 1, 2018 -- William Morrow -- 9780062490421 -- 819b642fffa68675f9e07cf3af773125 -- Anna’s Archive.14 | 9780062490452_Chapter_9.txt | People have been collecting the bones of T. rex, Triceratops, and their contemporaries for well over a hundred years now throughout the upper Great Plains of the American West. The rocks of Hell Creek are very well dated, too. And that means you can track the diversity and abundance of dinosaurs through time, right up to the iridium layer that fingerprints the asteroid. A number of scientists have done just that—my friend David Fastovsky (author of the best dinosaur textbook on the market) and his colleague Peter Sheehan, a team led by Dean Pearson, and other crews led by Tyler Lyson, a gifted young scientist who grew up on a sprawling ranch in North Dakota in the heart of some of the best dinosaur-bone badlands. They’ve all found the same thing: dinosaurs were thriving all throughout the time the Hell Creek rocks were laid down, as the Indian volcanoes were erupting and temperatures and sea levels were changing, right up to that moment the asteroid hit. There are even Triceratops bones a few centimeters below the iridium. It seems that the asteroid caught the residents of Hell Creek blissfully unaware, right at the peak of their glory days. Things were similar in Spain, where important new discoveries are emerging from the Pyrenees, along the border with France. This area is being scoured by an energetic duo of thirty-something paleontologists—Bernat Vila and Albert Sellés, two of the most dedicated guys I know, who often find themselves working for months on end without a salary, victims of Spain’s torturously slow recovery from a series of financial crises that began in the late 2000s. Somehow that hasn’t stopped them. They keep finding dinosaur bones, teeth, footprints, and even eggs. These fossils show that a diverse community—including theropods, sauropods, and duckbills—persisted here into the very latest Cretaceous with no indication that anything was amiss. It’s interesting that, a few million years before the asteroid hit, there was a brief turnover event, when armored dinosaurs disappeared locally and more primitive plant-eaters were replaced by advanced duckbills. It’s possible that this is related to the decline of the big plant-eaters in North America, although this is hard to prove. It may be that changes in sea level were to blame; as seas rose and fell, they carved up the land that dinosaurs could live on, which led to some small changes in the composition of ecosystems. Finally, the story appears to be the same in Romania, where Mátyás Vremir and Zoltán Csiki-Sava have been collecting a great diversity of latest Cretaceous dinosaurs, and also in Brazil, where Roberto Candeiro and his students keep finding more teeth and bones of big theropods and enormous sauropods that probably made it to the end. |
The rise and fall of the dinosaurs [eBook - NC Digital -- Steve Brusatte -- 1, 2018 -- William Morrow -- 9780062490421 -- 819b642fffa68675f9e07cf3af773125 -- Anna’s Archive.15 | 9780062490452_Chapter_9.txt | The drawbacks of these places are that the rocks are still not dated very well, so we can’t be absolutely sure where the dinosaur fossils sit relative to the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, but no doubt the dinosaurs in both areas are latest Cretaceous in age, and there are no signs that they were in any type of trouble. There was so much new evidence from fossils, statistics, and computer modeling that Richard Butler and I figured the time had come to synthesize it. We came up with something of a dangerous idea: perhaps we could recruit a crack team of dinosaur experts to sit down, discuss everything we currently know about the dinosaur extinction, and try to come to a consensus on why we thought dinosaurs died out. Paleontologists had been arguing for decades on this topic, and in fact it was dinosaur workers who were some of the most ardent skeptics of the asteroid hypothesis in the 1980s. We thought our subversive little plot might end in deadlock or, worse, in a shouting match, but quite the opposite happened. Our team came to an agreement. Dinosaurs were doing well in the latest Cretaceous. Their overall diversity—both in terms of species numbers and anatomical disparity—was fairly stable. It had not been gradually declining for millions and millions of years, nor was it clearly increasing. The major groups of dinosaurs all persisted into the very latest Cretaceous—theropods big and small, sauropods, horned and duck-billed dinosaurs, dome-headed dinosaurs, armored dinosaurs, smaller plant-eaters, and omnivores. At least in North America, where the fossil record is best, we know that T. rex, Triceratops, and the other Hell Creek dinosaurs were there when the asteroid destroyed much of the Earth. All of these facts rule out the once popular hypothesis that dinosaurs wasted away gradually due to long-term changes in sea level and temperature or that the Indian volcanoes had started to pick away at the dinosaurs earlier in the Late Cretaceous, a few million years before the end. Instead, we found that there is no doubt about it: the dinosaur extinction was abrupt, in geological terms. This means that it happened over the course of a few thousand years at most. Dinosaurs were prospering, and then they simply disappear from the rocks, simultaneously all over the world, wherever latest Cretaceous rocks are known. We never find their fossils in the Paleogene rocks laid down after the asteroid impact—nothing, not a single bone or a single footprint anywhere. This means a sudden, dramatic, catastrophic event is likely to blame, and the asteroid is the obvious culprit. However, there is a nuance. The big herbivores did undergo a bit of a decline right before the end of the Cretaceous, and the European dinosaurs experienced a turnover as well. This decline apparently had consequences: it made ecosystems more susceptible to collapse, making it more likely that the extinction of just a few species would cascade through the food chain. |
The rise and fall of the dinosaurs [eBook - NC Digital -- Steve Brusatte -- 1, 2018 -- William Morrow -- 9780062490421 -- 819b642fffa68675f9e07cf3af773125 -- Anna’s Archive.16 | 9780062490452_Chapter_9.txt | All told, then, it appears the asteroid came at a horrible time for the dinosaurs. If it had hit a few million years earlier, before the dip in herbivore diversity and perhaps the European turnover, ecosystems would have been more robust and would have been in a better position to deal with the impact. If it happened a few million years later, maybe herbivore diversity would have recovered—as it had countless other times over the preceding 150-plus million years of dinosaur evolution, when small diversity declines occurred and were corrected—and ecosystems again would have been more robust. There’s probably never a good time for a six-mile-wide asteroid to shoot down from the cosmos, but for dinosaurs, 66 million years ago may have been among the worst possible times—a narrow window when they were particularly exposed. If it had happened a few million years earlier or later, maybe it wouldn’t just be seagulls congregating outside my window but tyrannosaurs and sauropods too. Or perhaps not. It’s possible the massive asteroid would have done them in regardless. Maybe there was no escape from something that big, packing that kind of punch when it barreled its way into the Yucatán. Whatever the exact sequence of events, I’m confident the asteroid was the primary reason that the non-bird dinosaurs died out. If there is one, single straightforward proposition that I would stake my career on, it would be this: no asteroid, no dinosaur extinction. THERE IS ONE final puzzle that I haven’t addressed yet. Why did all the non-bird dinosaurs die at the end of the Cretaceous? After all, the asteroid didn’t kill everything. Plenty of animals made it through: frogs, salamanders, lizards and snakes, turtles and crocodiles, mammals, and yes, some dinosaurs—in the guise of birds. Not to mention so many shelled invertebrates and fishes in the oceans, although that could be the subject of another book entirely. So what was it about T. rex, Triceratops, the sauropods, and their kin that made them a target? This is a key question. We want to answer it particularly because it’s relevant to our modern world. When there is sudden global environmental and climate change, what lives and what dies? It’s case studies in the history of life—recorded by fossils, like the end-Cretaceous extinction—that provide critical insight. The first thing we have to realize is that, although some species did survive the immediate hellfire of the impact and the longer-term climate upheaval, most did not. It’s estimated that some 70 percent of species went extinct. That includes a whole lot of amphibians and reptiles and probably the majority of mammals and birds, so it’s not simply “dinosaurs died, mammals and birds survived,” the line often parroted in textbooks and television documentaries. If not for a few good genes or a few strokes of good luck, our mammalian ancestors might have gone the way of the dinosaurs, and I wouldn’t be here typing this book. |
The rise and fall of the dinosaurs [eBook - NC Digital -- Steve Brusatte -- 1, 2018 -- William Morrow -- 9780062490421 -- 819b642fffa68675f9e07cf3af773125 -- Anna’s Archive.17 | 9780062490452_Chapter_9.txt | There are some things, however, that do seem to distinguish the victims from the survivors. The mammals that lived on were generally smaller than the ones that perished, and they had more omnivorous diets. It seems that being able to scurry around, hide in burrows, and eat a whole variety of different foods was advantageous during the madness of the postimpact world. Turtles and crocodiles fared pretty well compared to other vertebrates, and that is probably because they were able to hide out underwater during those first few hours of bedlam, shielding themselves from the deluge of rock bullets and the earthquakes. Not only that, but their aquatic ecosystems were based on detritus. The critters at the base of their food chain ate decaying plants and other organic matter, not trees, shrubs, and flowers, so their food webs would not have collapsed when photosynthesis was shut down and plants started to die. In fact, plant decay would have just given them much more food. Dinosaurs had none of these advantages. Most of them were big, and they couldn’t easily scamper into burrows to wait out the firestorm. They couldn’t hide underwater, either. They were parts of food chains with big plant-eating species at the base, so when the sun was blocked and photosynthesis shut down and plants started to die, they felt the domino effects. Plus, most dinosaurs had fairly specialized diets—they ate meat or particular types of plants, without the flexibility that came with the more adventurous palates of the surviving mammals. And they had other handicaps as well. Many of them were probably warm-blooded or at least had a high metabolism, so they required a lot of food. They couldn’t hunker down for months without a meal, like some amphibians and reptiles. They laid eggs, which took between three and six months to hatch, about double the time for birds’ eggs. Then, after the eggs hatched, it took dinosaur youngsters many years to grow into adults, a long and tortured adolescence that would have made them particularly vulnerable to environmental changes. After the asteroid hit, there was probably no one thing that sealed the dinosaurs’ fate. They just had a lot of liabilities working against them. Being small, or having an omnivorous diet, or reproducing quickly—none of these things guaranteed survival, but each one increased the odds in what was probably a maelstrom of chance as the Earth devolved into a fickle casino. If life in that moment boiled down to a game of cards, dinosaurs were left holding a dead man’s hand. Some species, however, cashed in on a royal flush. Among them were our mouse-size ancestors, which made it to the other side and soon had the opportunity to build their own dynasty. Then there were the birds. Lots of birds and their close feathery dinosaur cousins died—all of the four-winged and batlike dinosaurs, all of the primitive birds with long tails and teeth. But modern-style birds endured. We don’t know why exactly. |
The rise and fall of the dinosaurs [eBook - NC Digital -- Steve Brusatte -- 1, 2018 -- William Morrow -- 9780062490421 -- 819b642fffa68675f9e07cf3af773125 -- Anna’s Archive.18 | 9780062490452_Chapter_9.txt | Maybe it was because their big wings and powerful chest muscles allowed them to literally fly away from the chaos and find safe shelter. Perhaps it was because their eggs hatched quickly, and once out of the nest, the fledglings grew rapidly into adults. It could be that they were specialized for eating seeds—little nuggets of nutrition that can survive in the soil for years, decades, even centuries. Most likely, it was a combination of these assets and others that we have yet to recognize. That and a whole lot of good luck. After all, so much about evolution—about life—comes down to fate. The dinosaurs got their very chance to rise up after those terrible volcanoes 250 million years ago wiped out nearly every species on Earth, and then they had the good fortune to sail through that second extinction at the end of the Triassic, which felled their crocodile competitors. Now the tables had turned. T. rex and Triceratops were gone. The sauropods would thunder across the land no more. But let’s not forget about those birds—they are dinosaurs, they survived, they are still with us. The dinosaur empire may be over, but the dinosaurs remain. |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.