Dataset Viewer
Search is not available for this dataset
image
imagewidth (px) 60
1.08k
| label
class label 413
classes |
---|---|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
|
412test_image
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
Overview
π Website β’ π€ Hugging Face β’ β¬ Data β’ π Paper
Dataset
GeoSense is the first comprehensive bilingual benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the geometric reasoning abilities of MLLMs through the lens of geometric principles. GeoSense features a five-level hierarchical framework of geometric principles spanning plane and solid geometry, an intricately annotated dataset of 1,789 problems, and an innovative evaluation strategy. Please visit our website or check our paper for more details.
This is the evaluation repository for GeoSense, and it follows the MIT License.
π« Introduction
- To comprehensively assess the reasoning abilities of MLLMs, we present GeoSense, which consists of a dataset containing 1,789 high-quality questions across 148 geometric principles (definitions, theorems, and formulas), spanning from plane geometry to solid geometry. Specifically, the key features of our proposed GeoSense are as follows:
- 5-level hierarchical framework of geometric principles: GeoSense has established a five-layer knowledge hierarchy encompassing 148 geometric principles, covering 65 definitions, 47 theorems, and 36 computation formulas in both plane and solid geometry, providing a multidimensional and fine-grained evaluation of the model's ability to identify and apply knowledge when faced with geometric problems.
- πIntricately annotated dataset: GeoSense collects 1,789 geometric problems and provides detailed bilingual annotations for 5,556 geometric principles necessary for solving these problems, including their correspondence and application to elements in geometric diagrams. Special tags (<note>) are used to mark key points in problem-solving to ensure comprehensive and accurate model evaluation. GeoSense follows a rigorous construction process, with 23 graduate students specializing in geometry conducting data annotation, review, and quality control.
- β‘An innovative evaluation strategy: GeoSense employs innovative evaluation methods, introducing two novel metrics: GPI (Geometric Principles Identification) and GPA (Geometric Principles Application). These metrics focus on assessing the modelβs ability to identify and apply geometric principles in complex visual scenarios, helping to identify potential shortcomings and areas for improvement in the modelβs reasoning process.
- Based on GeoSense, we have conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. We also maintain a comprehensive leaderboard list.
π Leaderboard
Please visit our website
βοΈ Evals
Please visit our github
Citation
Please cite our paper if you use our dataset.
@misc{xu2025geosenseevaluatingidentificationapplication,
title={GeoSense: Evaluating Identification and Application of Geometric Principles in Multimodal Reasoning},
author={Liangyu Xu and Yingxiu Zhao and Jingyun Wang and Yingyao Wang and Bu Pi and Chen Wang and Mingliang Zhang and Jihao Gu and Xiang Li and Xiaoyong Zhu and Jun Song and Bo Zheng},
year={2025},
eprint={2504.12597},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12597},
}
- Downloads last month
- 750