FinML-Chain: A Blockchain-Integrated Dataset for Enhanced Financial Machine Learning
Data
Collection for On-chain Data
We collect the data through BigQuery, and the code we used is in Query
Code for querying data
You can also refer to BigQuery for more information.
Collection for Off-chain Data
On-chain Data Infomation
Data Files |
Data Type |
Data Content |
ETH-Token-airdrop.csv |
Raw Data |
Critical indicators related to gas during tokrn airdrop period |
ETH-Normal.csv |
Raw Data |
Critical indicators related to gas during normal period |
On chain Data Dictionary
- ETH-Token-airdrop.csv and ETH-Normal.csv
Variable Name |
Description |
Type |
timestamp |
Recoding of the time of each block |
String |
number |
The number of blocks on the chain |
Numeric |
gas_used |
Actual gas used |
Numeric |
gas_limit |
The maximum allowed gas per block |
Numeric |
base_fee_per_gas |
The base fee set for each block |
Numeric |
- Additional Variables we create
Variable Name |
Description |
Type |
gas_fraction |
Fraction between Gas Used and Gas Limit |
Numeric |
gas_target |
The optimal gas used for each block |
Numeric |
Y |
Normalized Gas Used |
Numeric |
Yt |
Response variable equals to the gas_fraction |
Numeric |
Off-chain Data Information
Variable Name |
Description |
Type |
chat text |
people's chat (sentences) |
String |
Code
Results
Baseline results
Flow chart
Monotonicity Two-step training loss (normal training and monotonic training)
We utilized the NAM model due to its inherent transparency characteristic and the ability to isolate variables, facilitating the imposition of monotonicity constraints on specific features. The model is trained on data from two distinct periods, achieving weak pairwise monotonicity over the $\alpha$ feature. In the first step, standard training is conducted to enable the model to learn from the data. In the second step, we impose monotonic constraints.
Sentiment (Combination of Off-chain and On-chain)
We further explore the NAM model at k=1,2 and 3. Given the availability of both on-chain and off-chain variables, we conducted tests to determine whether the inclusion of off-chain variables, specifically sentiment analysis, enhances the model's predictability.
Model Performance over Two Periods
Model Performance over Two Periods
|
+OC,+DS,+HS |
+OC,+DS,-HS |
+OC,-DS,+HS |
+OC,-DS,-HS |
Period 1: 03/21/2023 - 04/01/2023 (ARB-airdrop) |
3 Timesteps |
0.10022 |
0.10150 |
0.10164 |
0.10201 |
2 Timesteps |
0.10056 |
0.10249 |
0.10213 |
0.10265 |
1 Timestep |
0.10169 |
0.10190 |
0.10204 |
0.10290 |
Period 2: 06/01/2023 - 07/01/2023 (Normal) |
3 Timesteps |
0.13341 |
0.15657 |
0.16142 |
0.16089 |
2 Timesteps |
0.13477 |
0.15381 |
0.15806 |
0.16456 |
1 Timestep |
0.13593 |
0.15321 |
0.15459 |
0.18428 |
The notation "OC" refers to On-chain variables, while "HS" and "DS" denote Hourly Averaged Sentiment and Daily Averaged Sentiment, respectively. The ‘+’ symbol indicates the inclusion of a variable in the model, whereas the ‘-’ symbol denotes its exclusion. The numerical values represent the mean square error (MSE) of the model on the test dataset.