Datasets:

TheFinAI

/

CONVFINQA_train

like 0

Follow

The Fin AI 69

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 132 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase primarily was attributable to approximately $ 115 million of higher operating profit on c-130 programs due to increased volume and the retirement of risks ; increased volume and risk retirements on f-16 programs of about $ 50 million and c-5 programs of approximately $ 20 million ; and about $ 70 million due to risk retirements on other aeronautics sustainment activities in 2011 . these increases partially were offset by a decline in operating profit of approximately $ 75 million on the f-22 program and f-35 development contract primarily due to lower volume and about $ 55 million on other programs , including f-35 lrip , primarily due to lower profit rate adjustments in 2011 compared to 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 90 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 contracts and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to higher orders on f-35 contracts , which partially were offset by higher sales volume on the c-130 programs . trends we expect aeronautics will experience a mid single digit percentage range decline in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 . a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts . operating profit is projected to decrease at a high single digit percentage range from 2012 levels due to the expected decline in net sales as well as changes in aircraft mix , resulting in a slight decline in operating margins between the years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides management services , integrated information technology solutions , and advanced technology systems and expertise across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continuing downturn in the federal information technology budgets and the impact of the continuing resolution that was effective on october 1 , 2012 , the start of the u.s . government 2019s fiscal year . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td><td>$ 9921</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>808</td><td>874</td><td>814</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td><td>8.2% ( 8.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td><td>9700</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford ; warfighter information network-tactical ( win-t ) ; command , control , battle management and communications ( c2bmc ) ; and transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) ) . partially offsetting the decreases were higher net sales of approximately $ 140 million from qtc , which was acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and about $ 65 million from increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and persistent threat detection system ( ptds ) operational support . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2012 decreased $ 66 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million due to the favorable impact of the odin contract completion in 2011 ; about $ 25 million due to an increase in reserves for performance issues related to an international airborne surveillance system in 2012 ; and approximately $ 20 million due to lower volume on certain programs ( primarily c2bmc and win-t ) . partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in operating profit due to higher risk retirements of approximately $ 15 million from the twic program ; and about $ 10 million due to increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and ptds operational support . operating profit for the jtrs program was comparable as a decrease in volume was offset by a decrease in reserves . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 20 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .\nQuestion: what were the net sales in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9381.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?\nAnswer: 161.0\nQuestion: and what was the change in its value since 2008?\nAnswer: 61.0\nQuestion: in that same six year period, what was the change in the value of the apple inc . stock?\nAnswer: 331.0\nQuestion: and how much did this change represent in relation to that value in 2008?\nAnswer: 3.31\nQuestion: also in that period, what was the change in the value of the s&p computer hardware index?\nAnswer: 97.0\nQuestion: and what is this change as a portion of the 2008 value?\nAnswer: 0.97\nQuestion: what, then, is the difference between the apple inc . change as a portion of the 2008 value and the s&p computer hardware index?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.34" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2005 and 2004. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2005</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 19.28</td><td>$ 17.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>21.16</td><td>16.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>25.20</td><td>20.70</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>28.33</td><td>22.73</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr></table> on march 9 , 2006 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 29.83 per share as reported on the nyse . as of march 9 , 2006 , we had 419677495 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 687 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 ( ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes ) prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report and the section entitled 201cmanagement 2019s .\nQuestion: what was the change in the highest price of common stock from the last quarter of 2005 to the last one of 2006?\nAnswer: 9.58\nQuestion: and what is this change as a portion of that price in the last quarter of 2005?\nAnswer: 0.51093\nQuestion: what was that same change but from the third quarter of 2005 to that same one in 2006?\nAnswer: 9.35\nQuestion: and how much did this change represent in relation to the price in the third quarter of 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.58991" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no . 148 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation 2014transition and disclosure 2014an amendment of sfas no . 123 , 201d which provides optional transition guidance for those companies electing to voluntarily adopt the accounting provisions of sfas no . 123 . the company continues to use accounting principles board opinion no . 25 ( apb no . 25 ) , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d to account for equity grants and awards to employees , officers and directors and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 13 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas no . 123r ) , described below . the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td><td>$ -1163540 ( 1163540 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense associated with modifications net of related tax effect included in net loss asreported</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td><td>-38126 ( 38126 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td><td>$ -1201666 ( 1201666 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td><td>$ -5.95 ( 5.95 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td><td>$ -6.15 ( 6.15 )</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , the company modified certain option awards to accelerate vesting and recorded charges of $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million , respectively , and corresponding increases to additional paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . fair value of financial instruments 2014the carrying values of the company 2019s financial instruments , with the exception of long-term obligations , including current portion , reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 . as of december 31 , 2004 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.3 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . as of december 31 , 2003 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.4 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices for those or similar instruments . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . effective july 1 , 2004 , the plan was amended to increase the company match to 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , which is a revision of sfas no . 123 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation , 201d and supersedes apb no . 25 , accounting for .\nQuestion: what were employee contributions in 2003?\nAnswer: 825000.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2002?\nAnswer: 979000.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-154000.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecreased production volume as final aircraft deliveries were completed during the second quarter of 2012 and $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter during the second quarter of 2012 ; and about $ 270 million for various other programs ( primarily sustainment activities ) due to decreased volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 295 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; approximately $ 245 million for the c-5 program due to increased aircraft deliveries ( six aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to four in 2012 ) and other modernization activities ; and about $ 70 million for the f-35 development contract due to increased volume . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2013 decreased $ 87 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 85 million for the f-22 program , which includes approximately $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 and about $ 35 million due to decreased risk retirements and production volume ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program due to lower risk retirements and fewer deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; about $ 65 million for the c-5 program due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the third quarter of 2013 and lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 35 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activity and aircraft configuration mix . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 180 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for the f-35 development contract and included adjustments of approximately $ 85 million to reflect the inception-to-date impacts of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate in both 2013 and 2012 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 75 million lower for 2013 compared to backlog backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2015 net sales to be comparable or slightly behind 2014 due to a decline in f-16 deliveries as well as a decline in f-35 development activity , partially offset by an increase in production contracts . operating profit is also expected to decrease in the low single digit range , due primarily to contract mix , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7788</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>699</td><td>759</td><td>808</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 8700</td><td>$ 8300</td><td>$ 8700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 579 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , for 2014 compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 645 million for 2014 due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo and ptds ) and defense budgets tied to command and control programs ; and approximately $ 490 million for 2014 due to a decline in volume for various ongoing programs , which reflects lower funding levels and programs impacted by in-theater force reductions . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 550 million for 2014 due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net sales from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: -479.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.05415" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\non a regular basis our special asset committee closely monitors loans , primarily commercial loans , that are not included in the nonperforming or accruing past due categories and for which we are uncertain about the borrower 2019s ability to comply with existing repayment terms . these loans totaled $ .2 billion at both december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 . home equity loan portfolio our home equity loan portfolio totaled $ 34.7 billion as of december 31 , 2014 , or 17% ( 17 % ) of the total loan portfolio . of that total , $ 20.4 billion , or 59% ( 59 % ) , was outstanding under primarily variable-rate home equity lines of credit and $ 14.3 billion , or 41% ( 41 % ) , consisted of closed-end home equity installment loans . approximately 3% ( 3 % ) of the home equity portfolio was on nonperforming status as of december 31 , 2014 . as of december 31 , 2014 , we are in an originated first lien position for approximately 51% ( 51 % ) of the total portfolio and , where originated as a second lien , we currently hold or service the first lien position for approximately an additional 2% ( 2 % ) of the portfolio . the remaining 47% ( 47 % ) of the portfolio was secured by second liens where we do not hold the first lien position . the credit performance of the majority of the home equity portfolio where we are in , hold or service the first lien position , is superior to the portion of the portfolio where we hold the second lien position but do not hold the first lien . lien position information is generally based upon original ltv at the time of origination . however , after origination pnc is not typically notified when a senior lien position that is not held by pnc is satisfied . therefore , information about the current lien status of junior lien loans is less readily available in cases where pnc does not also hold the senior lien . additionally , pnc is not typically notified when a junior lien position is added after origination of a pnc first lien . this updated information for both junior and senior liens must be obtained from external sources , and therefore , pnc has contracted with an industry-leading third-party service provider to obtain updated loan , lien and collateral data that is aggregated from public and private sources . we track borrower performance monthly , including obtaining original ltvs , updated fico scores at least quarterly , updated ltvs semi-annually , and other credit metrics at least quarterly , including the historical performance of any mortgage loans regardless of lien position that we do or do not hold . this information is used for internal reporting and risk management . for internal reporting and risk management we also segment the population into pools based on product type ( e.g. , home equity loans , brokered home equity loans , home equity lines of credit , brokered home equity lines of credit ) . as part of our overall risk analysis and monitoring , we segment the home equity portfolio based upon the delinquency , modification status and bankruptcy status of these loans , as well as the delinquency , modification status and bankruptcy status of any mortgage loan with the same borrower ( regardless of whether it is a first lien senior to our second lien ) . in establishing our alll for non-impaired loans , we primarily utilize a delinquency roll-rate methodology for pools of loans . in accordance with accounting principles , under this methodology , we establish our allowance based upon incurred losses , not lifetime expected losses . the roll-rate methodology estimates transition/roll of loan balances from one delinquency state ( e.g. , 30-59 days past due ) to another delinquency state ( e.g. , 60-89 days past due ) and ultimately to charge-off . the roll through to charge-off is based on pnc 2019s actual loss experience for each type of pool . each of our home equity pools contains both first and second liens . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and the charge-off amounts for the pools , used to establish our allowance , include losses on both first and second liens loans . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20-year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay either interest or principal and interest . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . the risk associated with the borrower 2019s ability to satisfy the loan terms upon the draw period ending is considered in establishing our alll . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2014 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 36 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest only product principal and interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interest onlyproduct</td><td>principal andinterest product</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1597</td><td>$ 541</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>1366</td><td>437</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>2434</td><td>596</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>1072</td><td>813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019 and thereafter</td><td>3880</td><td>5391</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total ( a ) ( b )</td><td>$ 10349</td><td>$ 7778</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes all home equity lines of credit that mature in 2015 or later , including those with borrowers where we have terminated borrowing privileges . ( b ) includes approximately $ 154 million , $ 48 million , $ 57 million , $ 42 million and $ 564 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 and 2019 and thereafter , respectively . 76 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2014 what was the value of the home equity loan portfolio, in billions?\nAnswer: 34.7\nQuestion: and what percentage did it represent in relation to the total loan portfolio?\nAnswer: 17.0\nQuestion: what amount, then, in hundreds of billions, was this total loan portfolio?\nAnswer: 2.04118\nQuestion: and what is that in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "204.11765" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncash flows from operations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal year 2018</td><td>fiscal year 2017</td><td>fiscal year 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests</td><td>$ 2163.0</td><td>$ 1701.1</td><td>$ 1736.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>618.8</td><td>603.6</td><td>608.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>after-taxearnings from joint ventures</td><td>-84.7 ( 84.7 )</td><td>-85.0 ( 85.0 )</td><td>-88.4 ( 88.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>distributions of earnings from joint ventures</td><td>113.2</td><td>75.6</td><td>75.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock-based compensation</td><td>77.0</td><td>95.7</td><td>89.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-504.3 ( 504.3 )</td><td>183.9</td><td>120.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan contributions</td><td>-31.8 ( 31.8 )</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-47.8 ( 47.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs</td><td>4.6</td><td>35.7</td><td>118.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>divestitures loss ( gain )</td><td>-</td><td>13.5</td><td>-148.2 ( 148.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>126.0</td><td>117.0</td><td>107.2</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>changes in current assets and liabilities excluding the effects of acquisitions anddivestitures</td><td>542.1</td><td>-194.2 ( 194.2 )</td><td>298.5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>other net</td><td>-182.9 ( 182.9 )</td><td>-86.3 ( 86.3 )</td><td>-105.6 ( 105.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2841.0</td><td>$ 2415.2</td><td>$ 2764.2</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2018 , cash provided by operations was $ 2.8 billion compared to $ 2.4 billion in fiscal 2017 . the $ 426 million increase was primarily driven by the $ 462 million increase in net earnings and the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities , partially offset by a $ 688 million change in deferred income taxes . the change in deferred income taxes was primarily related to the $ 638 million provisional benefit from revaluing our net u.s . deferred tax liabilities to reflect the new u.s . corporate tax rate as a result of the tcja . the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in accounts payable of $ 476 million related to the extension of payment terms and timing of payments , and $ 264 million of changes in other current liabilities primarily driven by changes in income taxes payable , trade and advertising accruals , and incentive accruals . we strive to grow core working capital at or below the rate of growth in our net sales . for fiscal 2018 , core working capital decreased 27 percent , compared to a net sales increase of 1 percent . in fiscal 2017 , core working capital increased 9 percent , compared to a net sales decline of 6 percent , and in fiscal 2016 , core working capital decreased 41 percent , compared to net sales decline of 6 percent . in fiscal 2017 , our operations generated $ 2.4 billion of cash , compared to $ 2.8 billion in fiscal 2016 . the $ 349 million decrease was primarily driven by a $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities . the $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in other current liabilities driven by changes in income taxes payable , a decrease in incentive accruals , and changes in trade and advertising accruals due to reduced spending . the change in current assets and liabilities was also impacted by the timing of accounts payable . additionally , we recorded a $ 14 million loss on a divestiture during fiscal 2017 , compared to a $ 148 million net gain on divestitures during fiscal 2016 , and classified the related cash flows as investing activities. .\nQuestion: what was the value for earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests in 2018?\nAnswer: 2163.0\nQuestion: what was the value for earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1701.1" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadvance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( \"lifo\" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( \"fifo\" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 31 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1380573</td><td>$ 1294310</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>82767</td><td>72789</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 1463340</td><td>$ 1367099</td></tr></table> replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of inventories due to the adoption of lifo during 2006?\nAnswer: 82767.0\nQuestion: and what was that total in the beginning of the year?\nAnswer: 1380573.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this total, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.05995" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noperating expenses millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>$ 4063</td><td>$ 4457</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 9 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>2486</td><td>1763</td><td>3983</td><td>41</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>1836</td><td>1644</td><td>1928</td><td>12</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1487</td><td>1427</td><td>1366</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1142</td><td>1180</td><td>1326</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>719</td><td>687</td><td>840</td><td>5</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>$ 10764</td><td>$ 13900</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td><td>( 23 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 1.2 billion in 2010 versus 2009 . our fuel price per gallon increased 31% ( 31 % ) during the year , accounting for $ 566 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , depreciation , volume-related costs , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses during 2010 compared to 2009 . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . operating expenses decreased $ 3.1 billion in 2009 versus 2008 . our fuel price per gallon declined 44% ( 44 % ) during 2009 , decreasing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . cost savings from lower volume , productivity improvements , and better resource utilization also decreased operating expenses in 2009 . in addition , lower casualty expense resulting primarily from improving trends in safety performance decreased operating expenses in 2009 . conversely , wage and benefit inflation partially offset these reductions . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . general wage and benefit inflation increased costs by approximately $ 190 million in 2010 compared to 2009 . volume- related expenses and higher equity and incentive compensation also drove costs up during the year . workforce levels declined 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 as network efficiencies and ongoing productivity initiatives enabled us to effectively handle the 13% ( 13 % ) increase in volume levels with fewer employees . lower volume and productivity initiatives led to a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in our workforce in 2009 compared to 2008 , saving $ 516 million during the year . conversely , general wage and benefit inflation increased expenses , partially offsetting these savings . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 2.29 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2010 compared to $ 1.75 per gallon in 2009 , increased expenses by $ 566 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 10% ( 10 % ) in 2010 versus 2009 , driving fuel expense up by $ 166 million . conversely , the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , our fuel conservation programs and efficient network operations drove a 3% ( 3 % ) improvement in our fuel consumption rate in 2010 , resulting in $ 40 million of cost savings versus 2009 at the 2009 average fuel price . lower diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 1.75 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2009 compared to $ 3.15 per gallon in 2008 , reduced expenses by $ 1.3 billion in 2009 . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 17% ( 17 % ) in 2009 , lowering expenses by $ 664 million compared to 2008 . our fuel consumption rate improved 4% ( 4 % ) in 2009 , resulting in $ 147 million of cost savings versus 2008 at the 2008 average fuel price . the consumption rate savings versus 2008 using the lower 2009 fuel price was $ 68 million . newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , reflecting locomotive acquisitions in recent years and the impact of a smaller fleet due to storage of some of our older locomotives ; increased use of 2010 operating expenses .\nQuestion: what are the operating expenses for compensation and benefits in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4457.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncitigroup 2019s repurchases are primarily from government sponsored entities . the specific representations and warranties made by the company depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer . market conditions and credit-ratings agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions the company may agree to in loan sales . in the event of a breach of the representations and warranties , the company may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans ( generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest ) with the identified defects or indemnify ( 201cmake-whole 201d ) the investor or insurer . the company has recorded a repurchase reserve that is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . in the case of a repurchase , the company will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans . the company 2019s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage . however , contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach . in the case of a repurchase , the loan is typically considered a credit- impaired loan and accounted for under sop 03-3 , 201caccounting for certain loans and debt securities , acquired in a transfer 201d ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 , receivables 2014loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality ) . these repurchases have not had a material impact on nonperforming loan statistics , because credit-impaired purchased sop 03-3 loans are not included in nonaccrual loans . the company estimates its exposure to losses from its obligation to repurchase previously sold loans based on the probability of repurchase or make-whole and an estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole . this estimate is calculated separately by sales vintage ( i.e. , the year the loans were sold ) based on a combination of historical trends and forecasted repurchases and losses considering the : ( 1 ) trends in requests by investors for loan documentation packages to be reviewed ; ( 2 ) trends in recent repurchases and make-wholes ; ( 3 ) historical percentage of claims made as a percentage of loan documentation package requests ; ( 4 ) success rate in appealing claims ; ( 5 ) inventory of unresolved claims ; and ( 6 ) estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole , including the loss of principal , accrued interest , and foreclosure costs . the company does not change its estimation methodology by counterparty , but the historical experience and trends are considered when evaluating the overall reserve . the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim . during 2009 , loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased . in addition , our loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and recent experience . these factors contributed to a $ 493 million change in estimate for this reserve in 2009 . as indicated above , the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage . the majority of the repurchases in 2009 were from the 2006 and 2007 sales vintages , which also represent the vintages with the largest loss- given-repurchase . an insignificant percentage of 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006 , and this is expected to decrease , because those vintages are later in the credit cycle . although early in the credit cycle , the company has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2008 and 2009 vintages . in the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired sop 03-3 loan ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 ) , the difference between the loan 2019s fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve . payments to make the investor whole are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve . the provision for estimated probable losses arising from loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale , which is included in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . a liability for representations and warranties is estimated when the company sells loans and is updated quarterly . any subsequent adjustment to the provision is recorded in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . the activity in the repurchase reserve for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of the year</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for new sales</td><td>33</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in estimate</td><td>493</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>utilizations</td><td>-119 ( 119 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of the year</td><td>$ 482</td><td>$ 75</td></tr></table> goodwill goodwill represents an acquired company 2019s acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired . goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests , whereby goodwill is allocated to the company 2019s reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value . furthermore , on any business dispositions , goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit . intangible assets intangible assets 2014including core deposit intangibles , present value of future profits , purchased credit card relationships , other customer relationships , and other intangible assets , but excluding msrs 2014are amortized over their estimated useful lives . intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives , primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names , are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests . an impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value . for other intangible assets subject to amortization , an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset . other assets and other liabilities other assets include , among other items , loans held-for-sale , deferred tax assets , equity-method investments , interest and fees receivable , premises and equipment , end-user derivatives in a net receivable position , repossessed assets , and other receivables. .\nQuestion: what was the change in additions for new sales from 2008 to 2009, in millions?\nAnswer: 10.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of additions for new sales in the year of 2008, also in millions?\nAnswer: 23.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2008 total, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.43478" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndepending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under the credit facilities referred to above . the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 7.8 billion and $ 6.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we do not expect that these restrictions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . we declared dividends of $ 323 million in 2006 and $ 316 million in 2005 . shelf registration statement 2013 under a current shelf registration statement , we may issue any combination of debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings . at december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 500 million remaining for issuance under the current shelf registration statement . we have no immediate plans to issue any securities ; however , we routinely consider and evaluate opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital through issuances of debt securities under this shelf registration , and , therefore , we may issue debt securities at any time . 6 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2006 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624</td><td>$ 180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>546</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>498</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>456</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>419</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2914</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5457</td><td>$ 1916</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-680 ( 680 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1236</td></tr></table> rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 798 million in 2006 , $ 728 million in 2005 , and $ 651 million in 2004 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .\nQuestion: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases in 2006?\nAnswer: 5457.0\nQuestion: what are they for capital leases?\nAnswer: 1916.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 7373.0\nQuestion: what is the value for capital leases?\nAnswer: 1916.0\nQuestion: what is that over the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.25987" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin accordance with sfas no . 142 , goodwill and other intangible assets , the goodwill is not amortized , but will be subject to a periodic assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value-based test . none of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the company performs its annual test for impairment of goodwill in may of each year . the company is required to perform a periodic assessment between annual tests in certain circumstances . the company has performed its annual test of goodwill as of may 1 , 2006 and has determined there was no impairment of goodwill during 2006 . the company allocated $ 15.8 million of the purchase price to in-process research and development projects . in-process research and development ( ipr&d ) represents the valuation of acquired , to-be- completed research projects . at the acquisition date , cyvera 2019s ongoing research and development initiatives were primarily involved with the development of its veracode technology and the beadxpress reader . these two projects were approximately 50% ( 50 % ) and 25% ( 25 % ) complete at the date of acquisition , respectively . as of december 31 , 2006 , these two projects were approximately 90% ( 90 % ) and 80% ( 80 % ) complete , respectively . the value assigned to purchased ipr&d was determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired technology into commercially viable products , estimating the resulting net cash flows from the projects , and discounting the net cash flows to their present value . the revenue projections used to value the ipr&d were , in some cases , reduced based on the probability of developing a new technology , and considered the relevant market sizes and growth factors , expected trends in technology , and the nature and expected timing of new product introductions by the company and its competitors . the resulting net cash flows from such projects are based on the company 2019s estimates of cost of sales , operating expenses , and income taxes from such projects . the rates utilized to discount the net cash flows to their present value were based on estimated cost of capital calculations . due to the nature of the forecast and the risks associated with the projected growth and profitability of the developmental projects , discount rates of 30% ( 30 % ) were considered appropriate for the ipr&d . the company believes that these discount rates were commensurate with the projects 2019stage of development and the uncertainties in the economic estimates described above . if these projects are not successfully developed , the sales and profitability of the combined company may be adversely affected in future periods . the company believes that the foregoing assumptions used in the ipr&d analysis were reasonable at the time of the acquisition . no assurance can be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to estimate expected project sales , development costs or profitability , or the events associated with such projects , will transpire as estimated . at the date of acquisition , the development of these projects had not yet reached technological feasibility , and the research and development in progress had no alternative future uses . accordingly , these costs were charged to expense in the second quarter of 2005 . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the years ended january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended january 1 , year ended january 2 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended january 1 2006</td><td>year ended january 2 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 73501</td><td>$ 50583</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net loss</td><td>-6234 ( 6234 )</td><td>-9965 ( 9965 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net loss per share basic and diluted</td><td>-0.15 ( 0.15 )</td><td>-0.27 ( 0.27 )</td></tr></table> illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the change in revenues between 2005 and 2006?\nAnswer: 22918.0\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of those revenues in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.45308" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfinancial statement impact we believe that our accruals for sales returns , rebates , and discounts are reasonable and appropriate based on current facts and circumstances . our global rebate and discount liabilities are included in sales rebates and discounts on our consolidated balance sheet . our global sales return liability is included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2018 , a 5 percent change in our global sales return , rebate , and discount liability would have led to an approximate $ 275 million effect on our income before income taxes . the portion of our global sales return , rebate , and discount liability resulting from sales of our products in the u.s . was approximately 90 percent as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 . the following represents a roll-forward of our most significant u.s . pharmaceutical sales return , rebate , and discount liability balances , including managed care , medicare , and medicaid: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales return rebate and discount liabilities beginning of year</td><td>$ 4172.0</td><td>$ 3601.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reduction of net sales due to sales returns discounts and rebates ( 1 )</td><td>12529.6</td><td>10603.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash payments of discounts and rebates</td><td>-12023.4 ( 12023.4 )</td><td>-10033.2 ( 10033.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sales return rebate and discount liabilities end of year</td><td>$ 4678.2</td><td>$ 4172.0</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) adjustments of the estimates for these returns , rebates , and discounts to actual results were approximately 1 percent of consolidated net sales for each of the years presented . product litigation liabilities and other contingencies background and uncertainties product litigation liabilities and other contingencies are , by their nature , uncertain and based upon complex judgments and probabilities . the factors we consider in developing our product litigation liability reserves and other contingent liability amounts include the merits and jurisdiction of the litigation , the nature and the number of other similar current and past matters , the nature of the product and the current assessment of the science subject to the litigation , and the likelihood of settlement and current state of settlement discussions , if any . in addition , we accrue for certain product liability claims incurred , but not filed , to the extent we can formulate a reasonable estimate of their costs based primarily on historical claims experience and data regarding product usage . we accrue legal defense costs expected to be incurred in connection with significant product liability contingencies when both probable and reasonably estimable . we also consider the insurance coverage we have to diminish the exposure for periods covered by insurance . in assessing our insurance coverage , we consider the policy coverage limits and exclusions , the potential for denial of coverage by the insurance company , the financial condition of the insurers , and the possibility of and length of time for collection . due to a very restrictive market for product liability insurance , we are self-insured for product liability losses for all our currently marketed products . in addition to insurance coverage , we also consider any third-party indemnification to which we are entitled or under which we are obligated . with respect to our third-party indemnification rights , these considerations include the nature of the indemnification , the financial condition of the indemnifying party , and the possibility of and length of time for collection . the litigation accruals and environmental liabilities and the related estimated insurance recoverables have been reflected on a gross basis as liabilities and assets , respectively , on our consolidated balance sheets . impairment of indefinite-lived and long-lived assets background and uncertainties we review the carrying value of long-lived assets ( both intangible and tangible ) for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset ( or asset group ) may not be recoverable . we identify impairment by comparing the projected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset ( or asset group ) to its carrying value . if an impairment is identified , a loss is recorded equal to the excess of the asset 2019s net book value over its fair value , and the cost basis is adjusted . goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . when required , a comparison of fair value to the carrying amount of assets is performed to determine the amount of any impairment. .\nQuestion: what was the reduction of net sales due to sales returns discounts and rebates in 2018?\nAnswer: 12529.6\nQuestion: and what was it in 2017?\nAnswer: 10603.4\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 1926.2\nQuestion: what was the reduction of net sales due to sales returns discounts and rebates in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10603.4" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .\nQuestion: what was the total working capital for the years of 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 1695.0\nQuestion: and what is the average between those years?\nAnswer: 847.5\nQuestion: in that same year of 2015, what was the total of the revenue?\nAnswer: 7426.0\nQuestion: and how much did this total represent in relation to that average capital?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.76224" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 4.0 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 14.9 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 29 , 2012 , september 24 , 2011 , and september 25 , 2010 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 121251</td><td>$ 81570</td><td>$ 51011</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 10930</td><td>$ 5369</td><td>$ 5510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 791</td><td>$ 776</td><td>$ 1051</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 19111</td><td>$ 17018</td><td>$ 20956</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 50856</td><td>$ 37529</td><td>$ 18595</td></tr></table> as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had $ 121.3 billion in cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities , an increase of $ 39.7 billion or 49% ( 49 % ) from september 24 , 2011 . the principal components of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 50.9 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 8.3 billion , payments for acquisition of intangible assets of $ 1.1 billion and payments of dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 2.5 billion . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , $ 82.6 billion and $ 54.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments , common stock repurchases , dividends on its common stock , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 10.3 billion during 2012 , consisting of $ 865 million for retail store facilities and $ 9.5 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing process .\nQuestion: what was the value of annual operating cash flow in 2012?\nAnswer: 50856.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2011?\nAnswer: 37529.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 13327.0\nQuestion: what was the 2011 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "37529.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance of the company 2019s obligations under the senior notes , including any repurchase obligations resulting from a change of control , is unconditionally guaranteed , jointly and severally , on an unsecured basis , by each of hii 2019s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantees debt under the credit facility ( the 201csubsidiary guarantors 201d ) . the guarantees rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the guarantors . the subsidiary guarantors are each directly or indirectly 100% ( 100 % ) owned by hii . there are no significant restrictions on the ability of hii or any subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan . mississippi economic development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 83.7 million outstanding from the issuance of industrial revenue bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . these bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.81% ( 7.81 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) and mature in 2024 . while repayment of principal and interest is guaranteed by northrop grumman systems corporation , hii has agreed to indemnify northrop grumman systems corporation for any losses related to the guaranty . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 21.6 million outstanding from the issuance of gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds ( 201cgo zone irbs 201d ) issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . the go zone irbs were initially issued in a principal amount of $ 200 million , and in november 2010 , in connection with the anticipated spin-off , hii purchased $ 178 million of the bonds using the proceeds from a $ 178 million intercompany loan from northrop grumman . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity . the remaining bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 4.55% ( 4.55 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) , and mature in 2028 . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . the estimated fair value of the company 2019s total long-term debt , including current portions , at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 1864 million and $ 128 million , respectively . the fair value of the total long-term debt was calculated based on recent trades for most of the company 2019s debt instruments or based on interest rates prevailing on debt with substantially similar risks , terms and maturities . the aggregate amounts of principal payments due on long-term debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 29</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1305</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td></tr></table> 14 . investigations , claims , and litigation the company is involved in legal proceedings before various courts and administrative agencies , and is periodically subject to government examinations , inquiries and investigations . pursuant to fasb accounting standard codification 450 contingencies , the company has accrued for losses associated with investigations , claims and litigation when , and to the extent that , loss amounts related to the investigations , claims and litigation are probable and can be reasonably estimated . the actual losses that might be incurred to resolve such investigations , claims and litigation may be higher or lower than the amounts accrued . for matters where a material loss is probable or reasonably possible and the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated , but the company is able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses , such estimated range is required to be disclosed in these notes . this estimated range would be based on information currently available to the company and would involve elements of judgment and significant uncertainties . this estimated range of possible loss would not represent the company 2019s maximum possible loss exposure . for matters as to which the company is not able to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss , the company is required to indicate the reasons why it is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss . for matters not specifically described in these notes , the company does not believe , based on information currently available to it , that it is reasonably possible that the liabilities , if any , arising from .\nQuestion: what is the value of the long-term debt due after 2016?\nAnswer: 1305.0\nQuestion: and what is the total long-term debt?\nAnswer: 1859.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does that value represent in relation to this total?\nAnswer: 0.70199\nQuestion: and for the long-term debt due in the years of 2010 and 2011, how much does the 2011 represent in relation to the 2010 one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "14.5625" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in connection with the firm 2019s prime brokerage and clearing businesses , the firm agrees to clear and settle on behalf of its clients the transactions entered into by them with other brokerage firms . the firm 2019s obligations in respect of such transactions are secured by the assets in the client 2019s account as well as any proceeds received from the transactions cleared and settled by the firm on behalf of the client . in connection with joint venture investments , the firm may issue loan guarantees under which it may be liable in the event of fraud , misappropriation , environmental liabilities and certain other matters involving the borrower . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these guarantees and indemnifications have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . other representations , warranties and indemnifications . the firm provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of commercial transactions and occasionally indemnifies them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties . the firm may also provide indemnifications protecting against changes in or adverse application of certain u.s . tax laws in connection with ordinary-course transactions such as securities issuances , borrowings or derivatives . in addition , the firm may provide indemnifications to some counterparties to protect them in the event additional taxes are owed or payments are withheld , due either to a change in or an adverse application of certain non-u.s . tax laws . these indemnifications generally are standard contractual terms and are entered into in the ordinary course of business . generally , there are no stated or notional amounts included in these indemnifications , and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify are not expected to occur . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) and gs bank usa , subject to certain exceptions . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.60 in 2016 , $ 2.55 in 2015 and $ 2.25 in 2014 . on january 17 , 2017 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.65 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2017 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2017 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td><td>year ended december 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>36.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 165.88</td><td>$ 189.41</td><td>$ 171.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 6069</td><td>$ 4195</td><td>$ 5469</td></tr></table> 172 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the common equity dividends declared per common share in 2016?\nAnswer: 2.6\nQuestion: what about in 2015?\nAnswer: 2.55\nQuestion: what is the total dividends declared in these two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5.15" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in \"general and administrative expenses\" . effective january 1 , 2017 , the company adopted asu 2016-09 , improvements to employee share- based payment accounting , which allows employers to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur . the company elected this option using the modified retrospective transition method , with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings , and there was no material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations taken as a whole resulting from the reversal of previously estimated forfeitures . total compensation expense under the stock plan was approximately $ 10.8 million , $ 12.2 million and $ 6.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was approximately $ 0.2 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was approximately $ 14.1 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.2 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 4.8 million , $ 2.0 million and $ 1.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is listed below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 84.53 , $ 73.20 and $ 68.35 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td><td>0.10% ( 0.10 % ) - 1.05% ( 1.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td><td>3.932% ( 3.932 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td><td>15.41% ( 15.41 % ) - 16.04% ( 16.04 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the date of grant . volatility for maa was obtained by using a blend of both historical and implied volatility calculations . historical volatility was based on the standard deviation of daily total continuous returns , and implied volatility was based on the trailing month average of daily implied volatilities interpolating between the volatilities implied by stock call option contracts that were closest to the terms shown and closest to the money . the minimum volatility was based on a period of 3 years , 2 years and 1 year for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the maximum volatility was based on a period of 1 year , 1 year and 2 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the requisite service period is based on the criteria for the separate programs according to the vesting schedule. .\nQuestion: what was the highest volatility in the year of 2017?\nAnswer: 0.2185\nQuestion: and what was the lowest?\nAnswer: 0.2043\nQuestion: what is, then, the sum of those volatilities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.4228" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 479</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>19</td><td>17</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 486</td><td>$ 492</td><td>$ 463</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\nQuestion: what was the total of advertising costs in 2015?\nAnswer: 324.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 297.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total costs for the two years, combined?\nAnswer: 621.0\nQuestion: including 2013, what becomes this total?\nAnswer: 856.0\nQuestion: and what were the average costs between the three years?\nAnswer: 285.33333\nQuestion: and in that last year of the period, what were the r&d costs?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "505.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 3 . business combinations purchase combinations . during the fiscal years presented , the company made a number of purchase acquisitions . for each acquisition , the excess of the purchase price over the estimated value of the net tangible assets acquired was allocated to various intangible assets , consisting primarily of developed technology , customer and contract-related assets and goodwill . the values assigned to developed technologies related to each acquisition were based upon future discounted cash flows related to the existing products 2019 projected income streams . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the acquisitions , will not to be amortized . goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes . the amounts allocated to purchased in-process research and developments were determined through established valuation techniques in the high-technology industry and were expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses existed . the consolidated financial statements include the operating results of each business from the date of acquisition . the company does not consider these acquisitions to be material to its results of operations and is therefore not presenting pro forma statements of operations for the fiscal years ended october 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 . fiscal 2006 acquisitions sigma-c software ag ( sigma-c ) the company acquired sigma-c on august 16 , 2006 in an all-cash transaction . reasons for the acquisition . sigma-c provides simulation software that allows semiconductor manufacturers and their suppliers to develop and optimize process sequences for optical lithography , e-beam lithography and next-generation lithography technologies . the company believes the acquisition will enable a tighter integration between design and manufacturing tools , allowing the company 2019s customers to perform more accurate design layout analysis with 3d lithography simulation and better understand issues that affect ic wafer yields . purchase price . the company paid $ 20.5 million in cash for the outstanding shares and shareholder notes of which $ 2.05 million was deposited with an escrow agent and will be paid per the escrow agreement . the company believes that the escrow amount will be paid . the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 20500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition-related costs</td><td>2053</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 22553</td></tr></table> acquisition-related costs of $ 2.1 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees , estimated facilities closure costs and employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 0.9 million of the acquisition-related costs . the $ 1.2 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 primarily consists of legal , tax and accounting fees , estimated facilities closure costs and employee termination costs . assets acquired . the company performed a preliminary valuation and allocated the total purchase consideration to assets and liabilities . the company acquired $ 6.0 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 3.9 million in existing technology , $ 1.9 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in trade names to be amortized over five years . the company also acquired assets of $ 3.9 million and assumed liabilities of $ 5.1 million as result of this transaction . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the .\nQuestion: in 2006, what was the amount acquired by the company of intangible assets, in thousands?\nAnswer: 6000.0\nQuestion: and how much did this amount represent in relation to the total purchase price in that year?\nAnswer: 0.26604\nQuestion: considering that same amount of intangible assets, what percentage of it was for customer relationships?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.31667" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the state street corporation's cumulative total shareholder return on common stock from 2008 to 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nanalog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 31 , 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014</td><td>3188</td><td>$ 43.46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>818</td><td>$ 52.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-1151 ( 1151 )</td><td>$ 39.72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>$ 45.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr></table> as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was approximately $ 65.6 million , $ 57.4 million and $ 63.9 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors have authorized the company to repurchase $ 5.6 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 31 , 2015 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 140.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.0 billion under this program . an additional $ 544.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . 4 . industry , segment and geographic information the company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation of six operating segments . the company designs , develops , manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits ( ics ) . the chief executive officer has been identified as the company's chief operating decision maker . the company has determined that all of the company's operating segments share the following similar economic characteristics , and therefore meet the criteria established for operating segments to be aggregated into one reportable segment , namely : 2022 the primary source of revenue for each operating segment is the sale of integrated circuits . 2022 the integrated circuits sold by each of the company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes and raw materials in either the company 2019s own production facilities or by third-party wafer fabricators using proprietary processes . 2022 the company sells its products to tens of thousands of customers worldwide . many of these customers use products spanning all operating segments in a wide range of applications . 2022 the integrated circuits marketed by each of the company's operating segments are sold globally through a direct sales force , third-party distributors , independent sales representatives and via our website to the same types of customers . all of the company's operating segments share a similar long-term financial model as they have similar economic characteristics . the causes for variation in operating and financial performance are the same among the company's operating segments and include factors such as ( i ) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations , ( ii ) number of competitors , ( iii ) product .\nQuestion: what was the number of restricted stock units outstanding on november 1, 2014?\nAnswer: 3188.0\nQuestion: what was the price per share?\nAnswer: 43.46\nQuestion: what is the total value of restricted stock units outstanding at the end of 2014?\nAnswer: 138550.48\nQuestion: what was the total value of the restricted stock units at the end of 2015?\nAnswer: 128397.82\nQuestion: what is the difference?\nAnswer: -10152.66\nQuestion: what is the ratio of the value at the end of 2015 to the end of 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.07328" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements . the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher operating costs . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers in the primary metals industry and expansion projects and an increase in demand for existing customers in the chlor-alkali industry . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1542</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick sale</td><td>-158 ( 158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nuclear volume</td><td>-89 ( 89 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement</td><td>57</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nuclear fuel expenses</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 1469</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 73 million in 2017 primarily due to the absence of net revenue from the fitzpatrick plant after it was sold to exelon in march 2017 and lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more outage days in 2017 as compared to 2016 . the decrease was partially offset by an increase resulting from the reimbursement agreement with exelon pursuant to which exelon reimbursed entergy for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with preparing for the refueling and operation of fitzpatrick that otherwise would have been avoided had entergy shut down fitzpatrick in january 2017 and a decrease in nuclear fuel expenses primarily related to the impairments of the indian point 2 , indian point 3 , and palisades plants and related assets . revenues received from exelon in 2017 under the reimbursement agreement are offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and taxes other than income taxes and had no effect on net income . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the sale of fitzpatrick , the reimbursement agreement with exelon , and the impairments and related charges . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what were net revenues in 2017?\nAnswer: 1469.0\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2016?\nAnswer: 1542.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: -73.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.04734" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nanalog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining .\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance of goodwill from 2014 to 2015?\nAnswer: -5912.0\nQuestion: how much does this change represent, in percentage, in relation to to that balance in 2014?\nAnswer: -0.0036\nQuestion: and over the subsequent year, what was the change in that balance of goodwill?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "42590.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhumana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . in addition , certain tax effects of stock option exercises will be reported as a financing activity rather than an operating activity in the statements of cash flows . we adopted sfas 123r on january 1 , 2006 under the retrospective transition method using the black-scholes pricing model . the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model on diluted earnings per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 is disclosed on page 69 . in addition , the classification of cash inflows from any excess tax benefit associated with exercising stock options will change from an operating activity to a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows with no impact on total cash flows . we estimate the impact of this change in classification will decrease operating cash flows ( and increase financing cash flows ) by approximately $ 15.5 million in 2005 , $ 3.7 million in 2004 , and $ 15.2 million in 2003 . stock option expense after adopting sfas 123r is not expected to be materially different than our pro forma disclosure on page 69 and is dependent on levels of stock options granted during 2006 . 3 . acquisitions in january 2006 , our commercial segment reached an agreement to acquire cha service company , or cha health , a health plan serving employer groups in kentucky , for cash consideration of approximately $ 60.0 million plus any excess statutory surplus . this transaction , which is subject to regulatory approval , is expected to close effective in the second quarter of 2006 . on december 20 , 2005 , our commercial segment acquired corphealth , inc. , or corphealth , a behavioral health care management company , for cash consideration of approximately $ 54.2 million , including transaction costs . this acquisition allows humana to integrate coverage of medical and behavior health benefits . net tangible assets acquired of $ 6.0 million primarily consisted of cash and cash equivalents . the purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $ 48.2 million . we preliminarily allocated this excess purchase price to other intangible assets of $ 8.6 million and associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 3.2 million , and non-deductible goodwill of $ 42.8 million . the other intangible assets , which consist primarily of customer contracts , have a weighted average useful life of 14.7 years . the allocation is subject to change pending completion of the valuation by a third party valuation specialist firm assisting us in evaluating the fair value of the assets acquired . on february 16 , 2005 , our government segment acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare advantage members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 444.9 million in cash , including transaction costs . we financed the transaction with $ 294.0 million of borrowings under our credit agreement and $ 150.9 million of cash on hand . the purchase price is subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . this settlement , which will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill , is not expected to be material . the fair value of the acquired tangible assets ( assumed liabilities ) consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 92116</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>6510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>21315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-37375 ( 37375 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-23359 ( 23359 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-5915 ( 5915 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 53292</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: on december 20, 2005, what percentage did the total of net tangible assets acquired represent in relation to the purchase price of corphealth , inc.?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.1107" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1,</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td><td>$ 8850</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>16219</td><td>26771</td><td>12059</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recoveries and other</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td><td>-9733 ( 9733 )</td><td>-9427 ( 9427 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td></tr></table> the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional .\nQuestion: what is the balance of allowances at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 28520.0\nQuestion: what about 2008?\nAnswer: 11482.0\nQuestion: what is the change in the balance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "17038.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndistribution xpedx , our north american merchant distribution business , distributes products and services to a number of customer markets including : commercial printers with printing papers and graphic pre-press , printing presses and post-press equipment ; building services and away-from-home markets with facility supplies ; manufacturers with packaging supplies and equipment ; and to a growing number of customers , we exclusively provide distribution capabilities including warehousing and delivery services . xpedx is the leading wholesale distribution marketer in these customer and product segments in north america , operating 122 warehouse locations and 130 retail stores in the united states , mexico and cana- forest products international paper owns and manages approx- imately 200000 acres of forestlands and develop- ment properties in the united states , mostly in the south . our remaining forestlands are managed as a portfolio to optimize the economic value to our shareholders . most of our portfolio represents prop- erties that are likely to be sold to investors and other buyers for various purposes . specialty businesses and other chemicals : this business was sold in the first quarter of 2007 . ilim holding s.a . in october 2007 , international paper and ilim holding s.a . ( ilim ) completed a 50:50 joint venture to operate a pulp and paper business located in russia . ilim 2019s facilities include three paper mills located in bratsk , ust-ilimsk , and koryazhma , russia , with combined total pulp and paper capacity of over 2.5 million tons . ilim has exclusive harvesting rights on timberland and forest areas exceeding 12.8 million acres ( 5.2 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter . net sales for 2009 increased 16% ( 16 % ) to $ 8.9 billion compared with $ 7.7 billion in 2008 , and 69% ( 69 % ) compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2007 . operating profits were 95% ( 95 % ) higher in 2009 than in 2008 and more than double 2007 levels . benefits from higher total year-over-year shipments , including the impact of the cbpr business , ( $ 11 million ) , favorable operating costs ( $ 294 million ) , and lower raw material and freight costs ( $ 295 million ) were parti- ally offset by the effects of lower price realizations ( $ 243 million ) , higher corporate overhead allocations ( $ 85 million ) , incremental integration costs asso- ciated with the acquisition of the cbpr business ( $ 3 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included a gain of $ 849 million relating to alternative fuel mix- ture credits , u.s . plant closure costs of $ 653 million , and costs associated with the shutdown of the eti- enne mill in france of $ 87 million . industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 8890</td><td>$ 7690</td><td>$ 5245</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>761</td><td>390</td><td>374</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging results include the net sales and operating profits of the cbpr business from the august 4 , 2008 acquis- ition date . net sales were $ 7.6 billion in 2009 com- pared with $ 6.2 billion in 2008 and $ 3.9 billion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 were $ 791 million ( $ 682 million excluding alternative fuel mixture cred- its , mill closure costs and costs associated with the cbpr integration ) compared with $ 322 million ( $ 414 million excluding charges related to the write-up of cbpr inventory to fair value , cbpr integration costs and other facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 305 million in 2007 . excluding the effect of the cbpr acquisition , con- tainerboard and box shipments were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker customer demand . average sales price realizations were sig- nificantly lower for both containerboard and boxes due to weaker world-wide economic conditions . however , average sales margins for boxes .\nQuestion: what was the total of industrial packaging sales in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8890.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour overall gross margin percentage decreased to 59.8% ( 59.8 % ) in 2013 from 62.1% ( 62.1 % ) in 2012 . the decrease in the gross margin percentage was primarily due to the gross margin percentage decrease in pccg . we derived most of our overall gross margin dollars in 2013 and 2012 from the sale of platforms in the pccg and dcg operating segments . our net revenue for 2012 , which included 52 weeks , decreased by $ 658 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2011 , which included 53 weeks . the pccg and dcg platform unit sales decreased 1% ( 1 % ) while average selling prices were unchanged . additionally , lower netbook platform unit sales and multi-comm average selling prices , primarily discrete modems , contributed to the decrease . these decreases were partially offset by our mcafee operating segment , which we acquired in the q1 2011 . mcafee contributed $ 469 million of additional revenue in 2012 compared to 2011 . our overall gross margin dollars for 2012 decreased by $ 606 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was due in large part to $ 494 million of excess capacity charges , as well as lower revenue from the pccg and dcg platform . to a lesser extent , approximately $ 390 million of higher unit costs on the pccg and dcg platform as well as lower netbook and multi-comm revenue contributed to the decrease . the decrease was partially offset by $ 643 million of lower factory start-up costs as we transition from our 22nm process technology to r&d of our next- generation 14nm process technology , as well as $ 422 million of charges recorded in 2011 to repair and replace materials and systems impacted by a design issue related to our intel ae 6 series express chipset family . the decrease was also partially offset by the two additional months of results from our acquisition of mcafee , which occurred on february 28 , 2011 , contributing approximately $ 334 million of additional gross margin dollars in 2012 compared to 2011 . the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles resulted in a $ 557 million reduction to our overall gross margin dollars in 2012 , compared to $ 482 million in 2011 , primarily due to acquisitions completed in q1 2011 . our overall gross margin percentage in 2012 was flat from 2011 as higher excess capacity charges and higher unit costs on the pccg and dcg platform were offset by lower factory start-up costs and no impact in 2012 for a design issue related to our intel 6 series express chipset family . we derived a substantial majority of our overall gross margin dollars in 2012 and 2011 from the sale of platforms in the pccg and dcg operating segments . pc client group the revenue and operating income for the pccg operating segment for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 33039</td><td>$ 34504</td><td>$ 35624</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 11827</td><td>$ 13106</td><td>$ 14840</td></tr></table> net revenue for the pccg operating segment decreased by $ 1.5 billion , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2013 compared to 2012 . pccg platform unit sales were down 3% ( 3 % ) primarily on softness in traditional pc demand during the first nine months of the year . the decrease in revenue was driven by lower notebook and desktop platform unit sales which were down 4% ( 4 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) , respectively . pccg platform average selling prices were flat , with 6% ( 6 % ) higher desktop platform average selling prices offset by 4% ( 4 % ) lower notebook platform average selling prices . operating income decreased by $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , in 2013 compared to 2012 , which was driven by $ 1.5 billion of lower gross margin , partially offset by $ 200 million of lower operating expenses . the decrease in gross margin was driven by $ 1.5 billion of higher factory start-up costs primarily on our next-generation 14nm process technology as well as lower pccg platform revenue . these decreases were partially offset by approximately $ 520 million of lower pccg platform unit costs , $ 260 million of lower excess capacity charges , and higher sell-through of previously non- qualified units . net revenue for the pccg operating segment decreased by $ 1.1 billion , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2012 compared to 2011 . pccg revenue was negatively impacted by the growth of tablets as these devices compete with pcs for consumer sales . platform average selling prices and unit sales decreased 2% ( 2 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) , respectively . the decrease was driven by 6% ( 6 % ) lower notebook platform average selling prices and 5% ( 5 % ) lower desktop platform unit sales . these decreases were partially offset by a 4% ( 4 % ) increase in desktop platform average selling prices and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in notebook platform unit sales . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the operating margin in 2012?\nAnswer: 0.37984\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.35797" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense including special items noted below</td><td>$ 27.6</td><td>$ 91.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( \"special items\" )</td><td>7.2</td><td>48.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within \"other non- operating income ( expense ) , net\" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .\nQuestion: how much is the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 expected to represent in relation to that pension expense's amortization in 2019?\nAnswer: 1.37795\nQuestion: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?\nAnswer: 0.37795\nQuestion: in that same year of 2019, what were the pension expenses?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "91.8" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .\nQuestion: what is the difference in value of total debt between 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: 70.3\nQuestion: what was the value of total debt in 2013?\nAnswer: 1662.5\nQuestion: what was the percent change for the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.04229" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncustomer demand . this compared with 555000 tons of total downtime in 2006 of which 150000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6530</td><td>$ 6700</td><td>$ 6980</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 1101</td><td>$ 636</td><td>$ 434</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales in 2007 were $ 3.5 billion compared with $ 4.4 billion in 2006 ( $ 3.5 billion excluding the coated and super- calendered papers business ) and $ 4.8 billion in 2005 ( $ 3.2 billion excluding the coated and super- calendered papers business ) . sales volumes decreased in 2007 versus 2006 partially due to reduced production capacity resulting from the conversion of the paper machine at the pensacola mill to the production of lightweight linerboard for our industrial packaging segment . average sales price realizations increased significantly , reflecting benefits from price increases announced throughout 2007 . lack-of-order downtime declined to 27000 tons in 2007 from 40000 tons in 2006 . operating earnings of $ 537 million in 2007 increased from $ 482 million in 2006 ( $ 407 million excluding the coated and supercalendered papers business ) and $ 175 million in 2005 ( $ 74 million excluding the coated and supercalendered papers business ) . the benefits from improved average sales price realizations more than offset the effects of higher input costs for wood , energy , and freight . mill operations were favorable compared with the prior year due to current-year improvements in machine performance and energy conservation efforts . sales volumes for the first quarter of 2008 are expected to increase slightly , and the mix of prod- ucts sold to improve . demand for printing papers in north america was steady as the quarter began . price increases for cut-size paper and roll stock have been announced that are expected to be effective principally late in the first quarter . planned mill maintenance outage costs should be about the same as in the fourth quarter ; however , raw material costs are expected to continue to increase , primarily for wood and energy . brazil ian papers net sales for 2007 of $ 850 mil- lion were higher than the $ 495 million in 2006 and the $ 465 million in 2005 . compared with 2006 , aver- age sales price realizations improved reflecting price increases for uncoated freesheet paper realized dur- ing the second half of 2006 and the first half of 2007 . excluding the impact of the luiz antonio acquisition , sales volumes increased primarily for cut size and offset paper . operating profits for 2007 of $ 246 mil- lion were up from $ 122 million in 2006 and $ 134 mil- lion in 2005 as the benefits from higher sales prices and favorable manufacturing costs were only parti- ally offset by higher input costs . contributions from the luiz antonio acquisition increased net sales by approximately $ 350 million and earnings by approx- imately $ 80 million in 2007 . entering 2008 , sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper and pulp should be seasonally lower . average price realizations should be essentially flat , but mar- gins are expected to reflect a less favorable product mix . energy costs , primarily for hydroelectric power , are expected to increase significantly reflecting a lack of rainfall in brazil in the latter part of 2007 . european papers net sales in 2007 were $ 1.5 bil- lion compared with $ 1.3 billion in 2006 and $ 1.2 bil- lion in 2005 . sales volumes in 2007 were higher than in 2006 at our eastern european mills reflecting stronger market demand and improved efficiencies , but lower in western europe reflecting the closure of the marasquel mill in 2006 . average sales price real- izations increased significantly in 2007 in both east- ern and western european markets . operating profits of $ 214 million in 2007 increased from a loss of $ 16 million in 2006 and earnings of $ 88 million in 2005 . the loss in 2006 reflects the impact of a $ 128 million impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the fixed assets at the saillat , france mill . excluding this charge , the improvement in 2007 compared with 2006 reflects the contribution from higher net sales , partially offset by higher input costs for wood , energy and freight . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to be stable in western europe , but seasonally weaker in eastern europe and russia . average price realizations are expected to remain about flat . wood costs are expected to increase , especially in russia due to strong demand ahead of tariff increases , and energy costs are anticipated to be seasonally higher . asian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 20 million in 2007 , compared with $ 15 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 10 million in 2005 . operating earnings increased slightly in 2007 , but were close to breakeven in all periods . u.s . market pulp sales in 2007 totaled $ 655 mil- lion compared with $ 510 million and $ 525 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . sales volumes in 2007 were up from 2006 levels , primarily for paper and .\nQuestion: what were the net sales in 2006 for north american printing papers?\nAnswer: 4.4\nQuestion: and converted to the thousands?\nAnswer: 4400.0\nQuestion: and the total sales for that year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6700.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents item 1b . unresolved staff comments we have no unresolved sec staff comments to report . item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2015 , we owned or leased 126 major manufacturing sites and 14 major technical centers . a manufacturing site may include multiple plants and may be wholly or partially owned or leased . we also have many smaller manufacturing sites , sales offices , warehouses , engineering centers , joint ventures and other investments strategically located throughout the world . we have a presence in 44 countries . the following table shows the regional distribution of our major manufacturing sites by the operating segment that uses such facilities : north america europe , middle east & africa asia pacific south america total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>north america</td><td>europemiddle east& africa</td><td>asia pacific</td><td>south america</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>electrical/electronic architecture</td><td>30</td><td>32</td><td>25</td><td>5</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>powertrain systems</td><td>4</td><td>10</td><td>5</td><td>2</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>electronics and safety</td><td>3</td><td>7</td><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>37</td><td>49</td><td>33</td><td>7</td><td>126</td></tr></table> in addition to these manufacturing sites , we had 14 major technical centers : four in north america ; five in europe , middle east and africa ; four in asia pacific ; and one in south america . of our 126 major manufacturing sites and 14 major technical centers , which include facilities owned or leased by our consolidated subsidiaries , 77 are primarily owned and 63 are primarily leased . we frequently review our real estate portfolio and develop footprint strategies to support our customers 2019 global plans , while at the same time supporting our technical needs and controlling operating expenses . we believe our evolving portfolio will meet current and anticipated future needs . item 3 . legal proceedings we are from time to time subject to various actions , claims , suits , government investigations , and other proceedings incidental to our business , including those arising out of alleged defects , breach of contracts , competition and antitrust matters , product warranties , intellectual property matters , personal injury claims and employment-related matters . it is our opinion that the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations , or cash flows . with respect to warranty matters , although we cannot ensure that the future costs of warranty claims by customers will not be material , we believe our established reserves are adequate to cover potential warranty settlements . however , the final amounts required to resolve these matters could differ materially from our recorded estimates . gm ignition switch recall in the first quarter of 2014 , gm , delphi 2019s largest customer , initiated a product recall related to ignition switches . delphi received requests for information from , and cooperated with , various government agencies related to this ignition switch recall . in addition , delphi was initially named as a co-defendant along with gm ( and in certain cases other parties ) in class action and product liability lawsuits related to this matter . as of december 31 , 2015 , delphi was not named as a defendant in any class action complaints . although no assurances can be made as to the ultimate outcome of these or any other future claims , delphi does not believe a loss is probable and , accordingly , no reserve has been made as of december 31 , 2015 . unsecured creditors litigation the fourth amended and restated limited liability partnership agreement of delphi automotive llp ( the 201cfourth llp agreement 201d ) was entered into on july 12 , 2011 by the members of delphi automotive llp in order to position the company for its initial public offering . under the terms of the fourth llp agreement , if cumulative distributions to the members of delphi automotive llp under certain provisions of the fourth llp agreement exceed $ 7.2 billion , delphi , as disbursing agent on behalf of dphh , is required to pay to the holders of allowed general unsecured claims against dphh $ 32.50 for every $ 67.50 in excess of $ 7.2 billion distributed to the members , up to a maximum amount of $ 300 million . in december 2014 , a complaint was filed in the bankruptcy court alleging that the redemption by delphi automotive llp of the membership interests of gm and the pbgc , and the repurchase of shares and payment of dividends by delphi automotive plc , constituted distributions under the terms of the fourth llp agreement approximating $ 7.2 billion . delphi considers cumulative .\nQuestion: what portion of the total facilities are in europe middle east& africa?\nAnswer: 0.38889\nQuestion: what about in asia pacific?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.2619" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe environmental liability includes costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as for ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties . cost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . we believe that we have adequately accrued for our ultimate share of costs at sites subject to joint and several liability . however , the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . estimates may also vary due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation . we do not expect current obligations to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2006 , we were contingently liable for $ 464 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 6 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . indemnities 2013 our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements , including certain tax indemnifications , can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount , depending on the nature of the transactions and the agreements . due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or how they will be resolved , we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements . we do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions . income taxes 2013 as previously reported in our form 10-q for the quarter ended september 30 , 2005 , the irs has completed its examinations and issued notices of deficiency for tax years 1995 through 2002 . among their proposed adjustments is the disallowance of tax deductions claimed in connection with certain donations of property . in the fourth quarter of 2005 , the irs national office issued a technical advice memorandum which left unresolved whether the deductions were proper , pending further factual development . we continue to dispute the donation issue , as well as many of the other proposed adjustments , and will contest the associated tax deficiencies through the irs appeals process , and , if necessary , litigation . in addition , the irs is examining the corporation 2019s federal income tax returns for tax years 2003 and 2004 and should complete their exam in 2007 . we do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . 11 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>72</td><td>135</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>29</td><td>17</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the rental income from 2005 to 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "24.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report the allowance for credit losses increased $ 13.7 billion from the prior year to $ 23.8 billion . the increase included $ 4.1 billion of allowance related to noncredit-impaired loans acquired in the washington mutual transaction and the related accounting conformity provision . excluding held-for-sale loans , loans carried at fair value , and pur- chased credit-impaired consumer loans , the allowance for loan losses represented 3.62% ( 3.62 % ) of loans at december 31 , 2008 , compared with 1.88% ( 1.88 % ) at december 31 , 2007 . the consumer allowance for loan losses increased $ 10.5 billion from the prior year as a result of the washington mutual transaction and increased allowance for loan loss in residential real estate and credit card . the increase included additions to the allowance for loan losses of $ 4.7 billion driven by higher estimated losses for residential mort- gage and home equity loans as the weak labor market and weak overall economic conditions have resulted in increased delinquencies , while continued weak housing prices have driven a significant increase in loss severity . the allowance for loan losses related to credit card increased $ 4.3 billion from the prior year primarily due to the acquired allowance and subsequent conforming provision for loan loss related to the washington mutual bank acquisition and an increase in provision for loan losses of $ 2.3 billion in 2008 over 2007 , as higher estimated net charge-offs are expected in the port- folio resulting from the current economic conditions . the wholesale allowance for loan losses increase of $ 3.4 billion from december 31 , 2007 , reflected the effect of a weakening credit envi- ronment and the transfer of $ 4.9 billion of funded and unfunded leveraged lending commitments to retained loans from held-for-sale . to provide for the risk of loss inherent in the firm 2019s process of extending credit , an allowance for lending-related commitments is held for both wholesale and consumer , which is reported in other lia- bilities . the wholesale component is computed using a methodology similar to that used for the wholesale loan portfolio , modified for expected maturities and probabilities of drawdown and has an asset- specific component and a formula-based component . for a further discussion on the allowance for lending-related commitment see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . the allowance for lending-related commitments for both wholesale and consumer was $ 659 million and $ 850 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the decrease reflects the reduction in lending-related commitments at december 31 , 2008 . for more information , see page 102 of this annual report . the following table presents the allowance for loan losses and net charge-offs ( recoveries ) by business segment at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . net charge-offs ( recoveries ) december 31 , allowance for loan losses year ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2008</td><td>december 31 , 2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment bank</td><td>$ 3444</td><td>$ 1329</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 36</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>commercial banking</td><td>2826</td><td>1695</td><td>288</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>treasury & securities services</td><td>74</td><td>18</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset management</td><td>191</td><td>112</td><td>11</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate/private equity</td><td>10</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total wholesale</td><td>6545</td><td>3154</td><td>402</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>retail financial services</td><td>8918</td><td>2668</td><td>4877</td><td>1350</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>card services</td><td>7692</td><td>3407</td><td>4556</td><td>3116</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>corporate/private equity</td><td>9</td><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total consumer 2013 reported</td><td>16619</td><td>6080</td><td>9433</td><td>4466</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>credit card 2013 securitized</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>3612</td><td>2380</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total consumer 2013 managed</td><td>16619</td><td>6080</td><td>13045</td><td>6846</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>total</td><td>$ 23164</td><td>$ 9234</td><td>$ 13477</td><td>$ 6918</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the balance of net charge-offs for commercial banking as of december 31, 2008?\nAnswer: 2826.0\nQuestion: what about 2007?\nAnswer: 1695.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value between these years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1131.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , $ 2.1 billion for 2012 , and $ 2.2 billion for 2011 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2013</td><td>dec . 312012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 803</td><td>$ 825</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>491</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>385</td><td>376</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>356</td><td>318</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>207</td><td>213</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>169</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>96</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>579</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3086</td><td>$ 2923</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013 and 2012?\nAnswer: 4.4\nQuestion: what about the total including 2011?\nAnswer: 6.6\nQuestion: what is the average of these three years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.2" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrisks related to our common stock our stock price is extremely volatile . the trading price of our common stock has been extremely volatile and may continue to be volatile in the future . many factors could have an impact on our stock price , including fluctuations in our or our competitors 2019 operating results , clinical trial results or adverse events associated with our products , product development by us or our competitors , changes in laws , including healthcare , tax or intellectual property laws , intellectual property developments , changes in reimbursement or drug pricing , the existence or outcome of litigation or government proceedings , including the sec/doj investigation , failure to resolve , delays in resolving or other developments with respect to the issues raised in the warning letter , acquisitions or other strategic transactions , and the perceptions of our investors that we are not performing or meeting expectations . the trading price of the common stock of many biopharmaceutical companies , including ours , has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations , which have at times been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies whose stocks were affected . anti-takeover provisions in our charter and bylaws and under delaware law could make a third-party acquisition of us difficult and may frustrate any attempt to remove or replace our current management . our corporate charter and by-law provisions may discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change of control that might be beneficial to us or our stockholders . our bylaws provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board , the president , the secretary , or a majority of the board of directors , or upon the written request of stockholders who together own of record 25% ( 25 % ) of the outstanding stock of all classes entitled to vote at such meeting . our bylaws also specify that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors . our charter does not include a provision for cumulative voting for directors , which may have enabled a minority stockholder holding a sufficient percentage of a class of shares to elect one or more directors . under our charter , our board of directors has the authority , without further action by stockholders , to designate up to 5 shares of preferred stock in one or more series . the rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to , and may be adversely affected by , the rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred stock that may be issued in the future . because we are a delaware corporation , the anti-takeover provisions of delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us , even if the change in control would be beneficial to stockholders . we are subject to the provisions of section 203 of the delaware general laws , which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding voting stock , unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . we conduct our primary operations at the owned and leased facilities described below . location operations conducted approximate square feet expiration new haven , connecticut corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices 514000 2030 dublin , ireland global supply chain , distribution , and administration offices 160000 owned . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>operations conducted</td><td>approximatesquare feet</td><td>leaseexpirationdates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>new haven connecticut</td><td>corporate headquarters and executive sales research and development offices</td><td>514000</td><td>2030</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dublin ireland</td><td>global supply chain distribution and administration offices</td><td>160000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>athlone ireland</td><td>commercial research and development manufacturing</td><td>80000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>lexington massachusetts</td><td>research and development offices</td><td>81000</td><td>2019</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>bogart georgia</td><td>commercial research and development manufacturing</td><td>70000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>smithfield rhode island</td><td>commercial research and development manufacturing</td><td>67000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>zurich switzerland</td><td>regional executive and sales offices</td><td>69000</td><td>2025</td></tr></table> we believe that our administrative office space is adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future . we also believe that our research and development facilities and our manufacturing facilities , together with third party manufacturing facilities , will be adequate for our on-going activities . in addition to the locations above , we also lease space in other u.s . locations and in foreign countries to support our operations as a global organization. .\nQuestion: what is the square feet of the owned global supply chain distribution and administration offices?\nAnswer: 160000.0\nQuestion: what is the square feet of the owned commercial research and development manufacturing?\nAnswer: 80000.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of those values?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "240000.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 21 . expenses during the fourth quarter of 2008 , we elected to provide support to certain investment accounts managed by ssga through the purchase of asset- and mortgage-backed securities and a cash infusion , which resulted in a charge of $ 450 million . ssga manages certain investment accounts , offered to retirement plans , that allow participants to purchase and redeem units at a constant net asset value regardless of volatility in the underlying value of the assets held by the account . the accounts enter into contractual arrangements with independent third-party financial institutions that agree to make up any shortfall in the account if all the units are redeemed at the constant net asset value . the financial institutions have the right , under certain circumstances , to terminate this guarantee with respect to future investments in the account . during 2008 , the liquidity and pricing issues in the fixed-income markets adversely affected the market value of the securities in these accounts to the point that the third-party guarantors considered terminating their financial guarantees with the accounts . although we were not statutorily or contractually obligated to do so , we elected to purchase approximately $ 2.49 billion of asset- and mortgage-backed securities from these accounts that had been identified as presenting increased risk in the current market environment and to contribute an aggregate of $ 450 million to the accounts to improve the ratio of the market value of the accounts 2019 portfolio holdings to the book value of the accounts . we have no ongoing commitment or intent to provide support to these accounts . the securities are carried in investment securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . the components of other expenses were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer indemnification obligation</td><td>$ 200</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities processing</td><td>187</td><td>$ 79</td><td>$ 37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>505</td><td>399</td><td>281</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total other expenses</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 478</td><td>$ 318</td></tr></table> in september and october 2008 , lehman brothers holdings inc. , or lehman brothers , and certain of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings . while we had no unsecured financial exposure to lehman brothers or its affiliates , we indemnified certain customers in connection with these and other collateralized repurchase agreements with lehman brothers entities . in the then current market environment , the market value of the underlying collateral had declined . during the third quarter of 2008 , to the extent these declines resulted in collateral value falling below the indemnification obligation , we recorded a reserve to provide for our estimated net exposure . the reserve , which totaled $ 200 million , was based on the cost of satisfying the indemnification obligation net of the fair value of the collateral , which we purchased during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the collateral , composed of commercial real estate loans which are discussed in note 5 , is recorded in loans and leases in our consolidated statement of condition. .\nQuestion: what is the customer indemnification obligation in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "200.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n18 . allowance for credit losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008 ( 1 )</td><td>2007 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowance for loan losses at beginning of year</td><td>$ 29616</td><td>$ 16117</td><td>$ 8940</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross credit losses</td><td>-32784 ( 32784 )</td><td>-20760 ( 20760 )</td><td>-11864 ( 11864 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross recoveries</td><td>2043</td><td>1749</td><td>1938</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net credit ( losses ) recoveries ( ncls )</td><td>$ -30741 ( 30741 )</td><td>$ -19011 ( 19011 )</td><td>$ -9926 ( 9926 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ncls</td><td>$ 30741</td><td>$ 19011</td><td>$ 9926</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net reserve builds ( releases )</td><td>5741</td><td>11297</td><td>6550</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net specific reserve builds ( releases )</td><td>2278</td><td>3366</td><td>356</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total provision for credit losses</td><td>$ 38760</td><td>$ 33674</td><td>$ 16832</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>other net ( 2 )</td><td>-1602 ( 1602 )</td><td>-1164 ( 1164 )</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>allowance for loan losses at end of year</td><td>$ 36033</td><td>$ 29616</td><td>$ 16117</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at beginning of year ( 3 )</td><td>$ 887</td><td>$ 1250</td><td>$ 1100</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>provision for unfunded lending commitments</td><td>244</td><td>-363 ( 363 )</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at end of year ( 3 )</td><td>$ 1157</td><td>$ 887</td><td>$ 1250</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>total allowance for loans leases and unfunded lending commitments</td><td>$ 37190</td><td>$ 30503</td><td>$ 17367</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) reclassified to conform to the current period 2019s presentation . ( 2 ) 2009 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of approximately $ 543 million related to securitizations , approximately $ 402 million related to the sale or transfers to held-for-sale of u.s . real estate lending loans , and $ 562 million related to the transfer of the u.k . cards portfolio to held-for-sale . 2008 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of approximately $ 800 million related to fx translation , $ 102 million related to securitizations , $ 244 million for the sale of the german retail banking operation , $ 156 million for the sale of citicapital , partially offset by additions of $ 106 million related to the cuscatl e1n and bank of overseas chinese acquisitions . 2007 primarily includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of $ 475 million related to securitizations and transfers to loans held-for-sale , and reductions of $ 83 million related to the transfer of the u.k . citifinancial portfolio to held-for-sale , offset by additions of $ 610 million related to the acquisitions of egg , nikko cordial , grupo cuscatl e1n and grupo financiero uno . ( 3 ) represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the allowance for loan losses between 2008-09?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "13499.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the value of gross reserves in 2012?\nAnswer: 442.8\nQuestion: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?\nAnswer: 499.9\nQuestion: what is the change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-57.1" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nicos corporation on january 29 , 2007 , we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of icos corporation ( icos ) , our partner in the lilly icos llc joint venture for the manufacture and sale of cialis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction . the acquisition brought the full value of cialis to us and enabled us to realize operational effi ciencies in the further development , marketing , and selling of this product . the aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $ 2.3 bil- lion was fi nanced through borrowings . the acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting , resulting in goodwill of $ 646.7 million . no portion of this goodwill was deductible for tax purposes . we determined the following estimated fair values for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition . estimated fair value at january 29 , 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash and short-term investments</td><td>$ 197.7</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>developed product technology ( cialis ) 1</td><td>1659.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tax benefit of net operating losses</td><td>404.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill</td><td>646.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt assumed</td><td>-275.6 ( 275.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-583.5 ( 583.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other assets and liabilities 2014 net</td><td>-32.1 ( 32.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>acquired in-process research and development</td><td>303.5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 2320.7</td></tr></table> 1this intangible asset will be amortized over the remaining expected patent lives of cialis in each country ; patent expiry dates range from 2015 to 2017 . new indications for and formulations of the cialis compound in clinical testing at the time of the acquisition represented approximately 48 percent of the estimated fair value of the acquired ipr&d . the remaining value of acquired ipr&d represented several other products in development , with no one asset comprising a signifi cant por- tion of this value . the discount rate we used in valuing the acquired ipr&d projects was 20 percent , and the charge for acquired ipr&d of $ 303.5 million recorded in the fi rst quarter of 2007 was not deductible for tax purposes . other acquisitions during the second quarter of 2007 , we acquired all of the outstanding stock of both hypnion , inc . ( hypnion ) , a privately held neuroscience drug discovery company focused on sleep disorders , and ivy animal health , inc . ( ivy ) , a privately held applied research and pharmaceutical product development company focused on the animal health industry , for $ 445.0 million in cash . the acquisition of hypnion provided us with a broader and more substantive presence in the area of sleep disorder research and ownership of hy10275 , a novel phase ii compound with a dual mechanism of action aimed at promoting better sleep onset and sleep maintenance . this was hypnion 2019s only signifi cant asset . for this acquisi- tion , we recorded an acquired ipr&d charge of $ 291.1 million , which was not deductible for tax purposes . because hypnion was a development-stage company , the transaction was accounted for as an acquisition of assets rather than as a business combination and , therefore , goodwill was not recorded . the acquisition of ivy provides us with products that complement those of our animal health business . this acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting . we allocated $ 88.7 million of the purchase price to other identifi able intangible assets , primarily related to marketed products , $ 37.0 million to acquired ipr&d , and $ 25.0 million to goodwill . the other identifi able intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated remaining useful lives of 10 to 20 years . the $ 37.0 million allocated to acquired ipr&d was charged to expense in the second quarter of 2007 . goodwill resulting from this acquisition was fully allocated to the animal health business segment . the amount allocated to each of the intangible assets acquired , including goodwill of $ 25.0 million and the acquired ipr&d of $ 37.0 million , was deductible for tax purposes . product acquisitions in june 2008 , we entered into a licensing and development agreement with transpharma medical ltd . ( trans- pharma ) to acquire rights to its product and related drug delivery system for the treatment of osteoporosis . the product , which is administered transdermally using transpharma 2019s proprietary technology , was in phase ii clinical testing , and had no alternative future use . under the arrangement , we also gained non-exclusive access to trans- pharma 2019s viaderm drug delivery system for the product . as with many development-phase products , launch of the .\nQuestion: as of january 29, 2007, what was the estimated fair value of the goodwill?\nAnswer: 646.7\nQuestion: and what was the total purchase price?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2320.7" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2018 emerson annual report | 51 as of september 30 , 2018 , 1874750 shares awarded primarily in 2016 were outstanding , contingent on the company achieving its performance objectives through 2018 . the objectives for these shares were met at the 97 percent level at the end of 2018 and 1818508 shares will be distributed in early 2019 . additionally , the rights to receive a maximum of 2261700 and 2375313 common shares were awarded in 2018 and 2017 , respectively , under the new performance shares program , and are outstanding and contingent upon the company achieving its performance objectives through 2020 and 2019 , respectively . incentive shares plans also include restricted stock awards which involve distribution of common stock to key management employees subject to cliff vesting at the end of service periods ranging from three to ten years . the fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the average of the high and low market prices of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , with compensation expense recognized ratably over the applicable service period . in 2018 , 310000 shares of restricted stock vested as a result of participants fulfilling the applicable service requirements . consequently , 167837 shares were issued while 142163 shares were withheld for income taxes in accordance with minimum withholding requirements . as of september 30 , 2018 , there were 1276200 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding . the total fair value of shares distributed under incentive shares plans was $ 20 , $ 245 and $ 11 , respectively , in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , of which $ 9 , $ 101 and $ 4 was paid in cash , primarily for tax withholding . as of september 30 , 2018 , 10.3 million shares remained available for award under incentive shares plans . changes in shares outstanding but not yet earned under incentive shares plans during the year ended september 30 , 2018 follow ( shares in thousands ; assumes 100 percent payout of unvested awards ) : average grant date shares fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>average grant datefair value per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>4999</td><td>$ 50.33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2295</td><td>$ 63.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earned/vested</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td><td>$ 51.27</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canceled</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>$ 56.53</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>end of year</td><td>6898</td><td>$ 54.69</td></tr></table> total compensation expense for stock options and incentive shares was $ 216 , $ 115 and $ 159 for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , of which $ 5 and $ 14 was included in discontinued operations for 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in expense for 2018 reflects an increase in the company 2019s stock price and progress toward achieving its performance objectives . the decrease in expense for 2017 reflects the impact of changes in the stock price . income tax benefits recognized in the income statement for these compensation arrangements during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 42 , $ 33 and $ 45 , respectively . as of september 30 , 2018 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares awarded under these plans was $ 182 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . in addition to the employee stock option and incentive shares plans , in 2018 the company awarded 12228 shares of restricted stock and 2038 restricted stock units under the restricted stock plan for non-management directors . as of september 30 , 2018 , 159965 shares were available for issuance under this plan . ( 16 ) common and preferred stock at september 30 , 2018 , 37.0 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the company 2019s stock-based compensation plans . during 2018 , 15.1 million common shares were purchased and 2.6 million treasury shares were reissued . in 2017 , 6.6 million common shares were purchased and 5.5 million treasury shares were reissued . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the company had 5.4 million shares of $ 2.50 par value preferred stock authorized , with none issued. .\nQuestion: what was the sum of restricted stock awarded in 2018?\nAnswer: 14266.0\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares available for issuance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "159965.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .\nQuestion: how much were the short-term borrowings as of 12/31/14?\nAnswer: 107.2\nQuestion: and as of 12/31/13?\nAnswer: 179.1\nQuestion: and the total value combining these two years?\nAnswer: 286.3\nQuestion: and the average value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "143.15" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nexpected term 2014 the company uses historical employee exercise and option expiration data to estimate the expected term assumption for the black-scholes grant-date valuation . the company believes that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of a new option , and that generally its employees exhibit similar exercise behavior . risk-free interest rate 2014 the yield on zero-coupon u.s . treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected term assumption is used as the risk-free interest rate . expected dividend yield 2014 expected dividend yield is calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by the company 2019s board of directors for the current quarter and dividing that result by the closing stock price on the date of grant . until such time as the company 2019s board of directors declares a cash dividend for an amount that is different from the current quarter 2019s cash dividend , the current dividend will be used in deriving this assumption . cash dividends are not paid on options , restricted stock or restricted stock units . in connection with the acquisition , the company granted restricted stock awards to replace outstanding restricted stock awards of linear employees . these restricted stock awards entitle recipients to voting and nonforfeitable dividend rights from the date of grant . stock-based compensation expensexp p the amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the value of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest . forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates . the term 201cforfeitures 201d is distinct from 201ccancellations 201d or 201cexpirations 201d and represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered stock-based award . based on an analysis of its historical forfeitures , the company has applied an annual forfeitureff rate of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) to all unvested stock-based awards as of november 2 , 2019 . this analysis will be re-evaluated quarterly and the forfeiture rate will be adjusted as necessary . ultimately , the actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those awards that vest . total stock-based compensation expense recognized is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 20628</td><td>$ 18733</td><td>$ 12569</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>research and development</td><td>75305</td><td>81444</td><td>51258</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>selling marketing general and administrative</td><td>51829</td><td>50988</td><td>40361</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>special charges</td><td>2538</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total stock-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 150300</td><td>$ 151165</td><td>$ 104188</td></tr></table> as of november 2 , 2019 and november 3 , 2018 , the company capitalized $ 6.8 million and $ 7.1 million , respectively , of stock-based compensation in inventory . additional paid-in-capital ( apic ) pp poolp p ( ) the company adopted asu 2016-09 during fiscal 2018 . asu 2016-09 eliminated the apic pool and requires that excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recorded in the income statement when awards are settled . as a result of this adoption the company recorded total excess tax benefits of $ 28.7 million and $ 26.2 million in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018 , respectively , from its stock-based compensation payments within income tax expense in its consolidated statements of income . for fiscal 2017 , the apic pool represented the excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation that were available to absorb future tax deficiencies . if the amount of future tax deficiencies was greater than the available apic pool , the company recorded the excess as income tax expense in its consolidated statements of income . for fiscal 2017 , the company had a sufficient apic pool to cover any tax deficiencies recorded and as a result , these deficiencies did not affect its results of operations . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the cost of sales in 2019?\nAnswer: 20628.0\nQuestion: what was the cost in 2018?\nAnswer: 18733.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 1895.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.10116" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2006 , 2005 and 2004: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average fair value of options granted</td><td>$ 20.01</td><td>$ 9.48</td><td>$ 7.28</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>0.3534</td><td>0.3224</td><td>0.3577</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution yield</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td><td>0.98% ( 0.98 % )</td><td>1.30% ( 1.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life of options in years</td><td>6.3</td><td>6.3</td><td>6.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td></tr></table> the black-scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable . in addition , option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions , including the expected stock price volatility . because the company 2019s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options , and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate , in management 2019s opinion , the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options . the total fair value of shares vested during 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 was $ 9413 , $ 8249 , and $ 6418 respectively . the aggregate intrinsic values of options outstanding and exercisable at december 30 , 2006 were $ 204.1 million and $ 100.2 million , respectively . the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended december 30 , 2006 was $ 42.8 million . aggregate intrinsic value represents the positive difference between the company 2019s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period , which was $ 55.66 on december 29 , 2006 , and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding . as of december 30 , 2006 , there was $ 64.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation awards granted to employees under the option plans . that cost is expected to be recognized over a period of five years . employee stock purchase plan the shareholders also adopted an employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) . up to 2000000 shares of common stock have been reserved for the espp . shares will be offered to employees at a price equal to the lesser of 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the stock on the date of purchase or 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value on the enrollment date . the espp is intended to qualify as an 201cemployee stock purchase plan 201d under section 423 of the internal revenue code . during 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , 124693 , 112798 , and 117900 shares were purchased under the plan for a total purchase price of $ 3569 , $ 2824 , and $ 2691 , respectively . at december 30 , 2006 , approximately 1116811 shares were available for future issuance. .\nQuestion: what was the number of shares that vested in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "470.41479" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2009</td><td>116677</td><td>$ 280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>134245</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-34630 ( 34630 )</td><td>257</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-19830 ( 19830 )</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2010</td><td>196462</td><td>283</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the expense of class a common stock issued to non-executive directors in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.4" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>preliminary purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 8763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>2332</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>26711</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>21079</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-1349 ( 1349 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 57536</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>5998</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .\nQuestion: what was the total in acquired customer-related and network location intangibles, from american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements, in millions?\nAnswer: 147.7\nQuestion: and what is the expected period in which those location intangibles will be amortized, in years?\nAnswer: 20.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the expected annual amortization expenses, in millions?\nAnswer: 7.385\nQuestion: from that same company, what was the value of current assets, from preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition?\nAnswer: 11095.0\nQuestion: and what is the total sum of those current assets and the non-current ones?\nAnswer: 37806.0\nQuestion: including property and equipment, what then becomes that sum?\nAnswer: 21079.0\nQuestion: and including the intangible assets, what becomes this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "58885.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>lilly</td><td>peer group</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dec-13</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dec-14</td><td>$ 139.75</td><td>$ 114.39</td><td>$ 113.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec-15</td><td>$ 175.21</td><td>$ 116.56</td><td>$ 115.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dec-16</td><td>$ 157.03</td><td>$ 112.80</td><td>$ 129.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dec-17</td><td>$ 185.04</td><td>$ 128.90</td><td>$ 157.22</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dec-18</td><td>$ 259.88</td><td>$ 136.56</td><td>$ 150.33</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .\nQuestion: what was the price of lilly in 2018?\nAnswer: 259.88\nQuestion: what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?\nAnswer: 159.88\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 1.5988\nQuestion: what was the value of the s&p in 2018 less a $100 initial investment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "50.33" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .\nQuestion: what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc. in 2008?\nAnswer: 440.9\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 442.3\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: -1.4\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 net revenue?\nAnswer: -0.00317\nQuestion: how much is that in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.00317" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) ( a ) intrinsic value is based on a closing stock price as of december 31 , 2016 of $ 75.64 . the weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was estimated to be $ 9.35 , $ 10.67 and $ 9.15 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.4% ( 20.4 % )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>21.2% ( 21.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr></table> the company estimates future forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates . the company bases the risk-free interest rate that is used in the stock option valuation model on u.s . n treasury securities issued with maturities similar to the expected term of the options . the expected stock volatility factor is determined using historical daily price changes of the company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the expected term of the option and the impact of any expected trends . the dividend yield assumption is based on the current dividend yield at the grant tt date or management's forecasted expectations . the expected life assumption is determined by calculating the average term from the tt company's historical stock option activity and considering the impact of expected future trends . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 56.44 to $ 79.41 on various dates in 2016 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 61.33 to $ 69.33 on various dates in 20t 15 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 52.85 to $ 64.04 on various dates in 2014 . these shares were granted at the closing market price on the date of grant and vest annually over three years . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we have approximately 3 million and 4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . the december 31 , 2016 balance includes those rsu's converted in connection with the sungard acquisition as noted above . the company has provided for total stock compensation expense of $ 137 million , $ 98 million and $ 56 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is included in selling , general , and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , unless the expense is attributable to a discontinued operation . of the total stock compensation expense , $ 2 million for 2014 relates to liability based awards that will not be credited to additional paid in capital until issued . total d compensation expense for 2016 and 2015 did not include amounts relating to liability based awards . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 141 million and $ 206 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.4 years and 1.6 years , respectively . german pension plans our german operations have unfunded , defined benefit plan obligations . these obligations relate to benefits to be paid to germanaa employees upon retirement . the accumulated benefit obligation as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 49 million and $ 48 million , respectively , and the projected benefit obligation was $ 50 million and $ 49 million , respectively . the plan remains unfunded as of december 31 , 2016 . ( 15 ) divestitures and discontinued operations on december 7 , 2016 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to sell the sungard public sector and education ( \"ps&e\" ) businesses for $ 850 million . the transaction included all ps&e solutions , which provide a comprehensive set of technology solutions to address public safety and public administration needs of government entities as well asn the needs of k-12 school districts . the divestiture is consistent with our strategy to serve the financial services markets . we received cash proceeds , net of taxes and transaction-related expenses of approximately $ 500 million . net cash proceeds are expected to be used to reduce outstanding debt ( see note 10 ) . the ps&e businesses are included in the corporate and other segment . the transaction closed on february 1 , 2017 , resulting in an expected pre-tax gain ranging from $ 85 million to $ 90 million that will .\nQuestion: what was the fair value of options at the end of 2016?\nAnswer: 9.35\nQuestion: what was the fair value of options at the end of 2015?\nAnswer: 10.67\nQuestion: what was the change in value from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: -1.32\nQuestion: what was the fair value of options at the end of 2015?\nAnswer: 10.67\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.12371" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .\nQuestion: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2489.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2018</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment banking</td><td>$ 7862</td><td>$ 7371</td><td>$ 6273</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment management</td><td>6514</td><td>5803</td><td>5407</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commissions and fees</td><td>3199</td><td>3051</td><td>3208</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>market making</td><td>9451</td><td>7660</td><td>9933</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other principal transactions</td><td>5823</td><td>5913</td><td>3382</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>totalnon-interestrevenues</td><td>32849</td><td>29798</td><td>28203</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>interest income</td><td>19679</td><td>13113</td><td>9691</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>interest expense</td><td>15912</td><td>10181</td><td>7104</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net interest income</td><td>3767</td><td>2932</td><td>2587</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 36616</td><td>$ 32730</td><td>$ 30790</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 investment banking consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from financial advisory and underwriting assignments , as well as derivative transactions directly related to these assignments . these activities are included in our investment banking segment . 2030 investment management consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from providing investment management services to a diverse set of clients , as well as wealth advisory services and certain transaction services to high-net-worth individuals and families . these activities are included in our investment management segment . 2030 commissions and fees consists of revenues from executing and clearing client transactions on major stock , options and futures exchanges worldwide , as well as over-the-counter ( otc ) transactions . these activities are included in our institutional client services and investment management segments . 2030 market making consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from client execution activities related to making markets in interest rate products , credit products , mortgages , currencies , commodities and equity products . these activities are included in our institutional client services segment . 2030 other principal transactions consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . in addition , other principal transactions includes revenues related to our consolidated investments . these activities are included in our investing & lending segment . provision for credit losses , previously reported in other principal transactions revenues , is now reported as a separate line item in the consolidated statements of earnings . previously reported amounts have been conformed to the current presentation . operating environment . during 2018 , our market- making activities reflected generally higher levels of volatility and improved client activity , compared with a low volatility environment in 2017 . in investment banking , industry-wide mergers and acquisitions volumes increased compared with 2017 , while industry-wide underwriting transactions decreased . our other principal transactions revenues benefited from company-specific events , including sales , and strong corporate performance , while investments in public equities reflected losses , as global equity prices generally decreased in 2018 , particularly towards the end of the year . in investment management , our assets under supervision increased reflecting net inflows in liquidity products , fixed income assets and equity assets , partially offset by depreciation in client assets , primarily in equity assets . if market-making or investment banking activity levels decline , or assets under supervision decline , or asset prices continue to decline , net revenues would likely be negatively impacted . see 201csegment operating results 201d for further information about the operating environment and material trends and uncertainties that may impact our results of operations . during 2017 , generally higher asset prices and tighter credit spreads were supportive of industry-wide underwriting activities , investment management performance and other principal transactions . however , low levels of volatility in equity , fixed income , currency and commodity markets continued to negatively affect our market-making activities . 2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues . non-interest revenues . investment banking revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 7.86 billion for 2018 , 7% ( 7 % ) higher than 2017 . revenues in financial advisory were higher , reflecting an increase in industry-wide completed mergers and acquisitions volumes . revenues in underwriting were slightly higher , due to significantly higher revenues in equity underwriting , driven by initial public offerings , partially offset by lower revenues in debt underwriting , reflecting a decline in leveraged finance activity . investment management revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 6.51 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher incentive fees , as a result of harvesting . management and other fees were also higher , reflecting higher average assets under supervision and the impact of the recently adopted revenue recognition standard , partially offset by shifts in the mix of client assets and strategies . see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about asu no . 2014-09 , 201crevenue from contracts with customers ( topic 606 ) . 201d 52 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the total net revenues for 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "36616.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2012 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions , partially offset by the net proceeds of $ 94.8 received from the sale of our remaining holdings in facebook . capital expenditures of $ 169.2 primarily related to computer hardware and software , and leasehold improvements . capital expenditures increased in 2012 compared to the prior year , primarily due to an increase in leasehold improvements made during the year . payments for acquisitions of $ 145.5 primarily related to payments for new acquisitions . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock , and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . net cash provided by financing activities during 2012 primarily reflected net proceeds from our debt transactions . we issued $ 300.0 in aggregate principal amount of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) senior notes due 2017 ( the 201c2.25% ( 201c2.25 % ) notes 201d ) , $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) senior notes due 2023 ( the 201c3.75% ( 201c3.75 % ) notes 201d ) and $ 250.0 in aggregate principal amount of 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) senior notes due 2022 ( the 201c4.00% ( 201c4.00 % ) notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) notes were applied towards the repurchase and redemption of $ 399.6 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes . offsetting the net proceeds from our debt transactions was the repurchase of 32.7 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 350.5 , including fees , and dividend payments of $ 103.4 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , japanese yen , canadian dollar and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 6.2 in 2012 . the decrease was a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the brazilian real and south african rand , offset by the u.s . dollar being weaker than other foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , british pound and the euro , as of as of december 31 , 2012 compared to december 31 , 2011. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1642.1</td><td>$ 2590.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 179.1</td><td>$ 172.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>353.6</td><td>216.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1129.8</td><td>2060.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1662.5</td><td>$ 2449.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends. .\nQuestion: what was the value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2013?\nAnswer: 1642.1\nQuestion: what was the value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2012?\nAnswer: 2590.8\nQuestion: what was the net difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-948.7" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncapitalized software : internally developed computer software costs and costs of product enhancements are capitalized subsequent to the determination of technological feasibility ; such capitalization continues until the product becomes available for commercial release . judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established . the company has determined that technological feasibility is reached after all high-risk development issues have been resolved through coding and testing . generally , the time between the establishment of technological feasibility and commercial release of software is minimal , resulting in insignificant or no capitalization of internally developed software costs . amortization of capitalized software costs , both for internally developed as well as for purchased software products , is computed on a product-by-product basis over the estimated economic life of the product , which is generally three years . amortization is the greater of the amount computed using : ( i ) the ratio of the current year 2019s gross revenue to the total current and anticipated future gross revenue for that product or ( ii ) the straight-line method over the estimated life of the product . amortization expense related to capitalized and acquired software costs , including the related trademarks , was $ 40.9 million , $ 33.7 million and $ 32.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the company periodically reviews the carrying value of capitalized software . impairments are recognized in the results of operations when the expected future undiscounted operating cash flow derived from the capitalized costs of internally developed software is less than the carrying value . no impairment charges have been required to date . goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired . intangible assets consist of trademarks , customer lists , contract backlog , and acquired software and technology . the company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually by performing a qualitative assessment of whether there is sufficient evidence that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount . the application of a qualitative assessment requires the company to assess and make judgments regarding a variety of factors which potentially impact the fair value of a reporting unit , including general economic conditions , industry and market-specific conditions , customer behavior , cost factors , the company 2019s financial performance and trends , the company 2019s strategies and business plans , capital requirements , management and personnel issues , and the company 2019s stock price , among others . the company then considers the totality of these and other factors , placing more weight on the events and circumstances that are judged to most affect a reporting unit 2019s fair value or the carrying amount of its net assets , to reach a qualitative conclusion regarding whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value , no further analysis is necessary . if it is determined that it is more likely than not the reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value , a quantitative two-step analysis is performed where the fair value of the reporting unit is estimated and the impairment loss , if any , is recorded . the company tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually by comparing the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value . the company performs its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test on january 1 of each year unless there is an indicator that would require a test during the year . the company periodically reviews the carrying value of other intangible assets and will recognize impairments when events or circumstances indicate that such assets may be impaired . no impairment charges have been required to date for the company's goodwill and other intangible assets . concentrations of credit risk : the company has a concentration of credit risk with respect to revenue and trade receivables due to the use of certain significant channel partners to market and sell the company 2019s products . the company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers 2019 financial condition and generally does not require collateral . the following table outlines concentrations of risk with respect to the company 2019s revenue: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( as a % ( % ) of revenue except customer data )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue from channel partners</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>largest channel partner</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2ndlargest channel partner</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>direct sale customers exceeding 5% ( 5 % ) of revenue</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> table of contents .\nQuestion: what was amortization expense related to capitalized and acquired software costs, including the related trademarks in 2012?\nAnswer: 40.9\nQuestion: what was the cost in 2011?\nAnswer: 33.7\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 74.6\nQuestion: what is the sum including the costs from 2010?\nAnswer: 107.4\nQuestion: what is the average per year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "35.8" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .\nQuestion: what was the value of average short term advances in 2014?\nAnswer: 3867.0\nQuestion: what was the value of average short term advances in 2013?\nAnswer: 3749.0\nQuestion: what what the net difference?\nAnswer: 118.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.03148" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n82 | 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows . reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1,</td><td>$ 1032</td><td>$ 968</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions related to current year</td><td>270</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>20</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for settlements2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>2014</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31,</td><td>$ 1286</td><td>$ 1032</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate</td><td>$ 1209</td><td>$ 963</td></tr></table> 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable . 2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability . we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes . we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s . income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 . in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines . we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion . we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines . we have filed u.s . income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 . based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months . we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations . with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s . tax assessment . in our major non-u.s . jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years . due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .\nQuestion: what was the provision for interest and penalties in 2017?\nAnswer: 38.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 34.0\nQuestion: what is the difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of american airlines stock over the 4 year period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "75.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) | 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .\nQuestion: what was the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s. subsidiaries totaled in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "338.5" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n30 2018 ppg annual report and 10-k foreign currency translation partially offset by : cost reclassifications associated with the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard . refer to note 2 , \"revenue recognition\" within part 2 of this form 10-k cost management including restructuring cost savings 2017 vs . 2016 selling , general and administrative expenses decreased $ 1 million primarily due to : lower net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs lower selling and advertising costs restructuring cost savings partially offset by : wage and other cost inflation selling , general and administrative expenses from acquired businesses foreign currency translation other charges and other income . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except percentages )</td><td>2018</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2016</td><td>% ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017</td><td>% ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense net of interest income</td><td>$ 95</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 99</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>( 14.1 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>business restructuring net</td><td>$ 66</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 191</td><td>n/a</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension settlement charges</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 60</td><td>$ 968</td><td>( 100.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>( 93.8 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other charges</td><td>$ 122</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 242</td><td>64.9% ( 64.9 % )</td><td>( 69.4 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other income</td><td>( $ 114 )</td><td>( $ 150 )</td><td>( $ 127 )</td><td>( 24.0 ) % ( % )</td><td>18.1% ( 18.1 % )</td></tr></table> interest expense , net of interest income interest expense , net of interest income increased $ 10 million in 2018 versus 2017 primarily due to the issuance of long- term debt in early 2018 . interest expense , net of interest income decreased $ 14 million in 2017 versus 2016 due to lower interest rate debt outstanding in 2017 . business restructuring , net a pretax restructuring charge of $ 83 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2018 , offset by certain changes in estimates to complete previously recorded programs of $ 17 million . a pretax charge of $ 191 million was recorded in 2016 . refer to note 8 , \"business restructuring\" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . pension settlement charges during 2017 , ppg made lump-sum payments to certain retirees who had participated in ppg's u.s . qualified and non- qualified pension plans totaling approximately $ 127 million . as the lump-sum payments were in excess of the expected 2017 service and interest costs for the affected plans , ppg remeasured the periodic benefit obligation of these plans in the period payments were made and recorded settlement charges totaling $ 60 million ( $ 38 million after-tax ) during 2017 . during 2016 , ppg permanently transferred approximately $ 1.8 billion of its u.s . and canadian pension obligations and assets to several highly rated insurance companies . these actions triggered remeasurement and partial settlement of certain of the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans . ppg recognized a $ 968 million pre-tax settlement charge in connection with these transactions . refer to note 13 , \"employee benefit plans\" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other charges other charges in 2018 and 2016 were higher than 2017 primarily due to environmental remediation charges . these charges were principally for environmental remediation at a former chromium manufacturing plant and associated sites in new jersey . refer to note 14 , \"commitments and contingent liabilities\" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other income other income was lower in 2018 and 2016 than in 2017 primarily due to the gain from the sale of the mexican plaka business of $ 25 million and income from a legal settlement of $ 18 million in 2017 . refer to note 3 , \"acquisitions and divestitures\" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information. .\nQuestion: what was the net interest expense in 2019?\nAnswer: 95.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2018?\nAnswer: 85.0\nQuestion: what is the difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) upon termination of employment , excluding retirement , all of a participant 2019s unvested awards are forfeited . however , when a participant terminates employment due to retirement , the participant generally retains all of their awards without providing additional service to the company . eligible retirement is dependent upon age and years of service , as follows : age 55 with ten years of service , age 60 with five years of service and age 65 with two years of service . compensation expense is recognized over the shorter of the vesting periods stated in the ltip , or the date the individual becomes eligible to retire . there are 11550 shares of class a common stock reserved for equity awards under the ltip . although the ltip permits the issuance of shares of class b common stock , no such shares have been reserved for issuance . shares issued as a result of option exercises and the conversions of rsus are expected to be funded with the issuance of new shares of class a common stock . stock options the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation and the resulting weighted- average fair value per option granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free rate of return</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected term ( in years )</td><td>6.17</td><td>6.25</td><td>6.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>41.7% ( 41.7 % )</td><td>37.9% ( 37.9 % )</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>0.4% ( 0.4 % )</td><td>0.3% ( 0.3 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average fair value per option granted</td><td>$ 71.03</td><td>$ 78.54</td><td>$ 41.03</td></tr></table> the risk-free rate of return was based on the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant . the company utilizes the simplified method for calculating the expected term of the option based on the vesting terms and the contractual life of the option . the expected volatility for options granted during 2009 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and a blend of the historical volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to mastercard . the expected volatility for options granted during 2008 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to mastercard . as the company did not have sufficient publicly traded stock data historically , the expected volatility for options granted during 2007 was primarily based on the average of the historical and implied volatility of a group of companies that management believed was generally comparable to mastercard . the expected dividend yields were based on the company 2019s expected annual dividend rate on the date of grant. .\nQuestion: what is the risk-free rate in 2009?\nAnswer: 2.5\nQuestion: what about in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.2" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>3/31/2010</td><td>3/31/2011</td><td>3/31/2012</td><td>3/31/2013</td><td>3/31/2014</td><td>3/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>abiomed inc</td><td>100</td><td>140.79</td><td>215.02</td><td>180.91</td><td>252.33</td><td>693.60</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite index</td><td>100</td><td>115.98</td><td>128.93</td><td>136.26</td><td>175.11</td><td>204.38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849</td><td>100</td><td>108.31</td><td>115.05</td><td>105.56</td><td>123.18</td><td>118.95</td></tr></table> this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .\nQuestion: what is the value of abiomed inc in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "180.91" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>759</td><td>808</td><td>874</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8300</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .\nQuestion: what is the operating profit in 2013?\nAnswer: 759.0\nQuestion: what about in 2012\nAnswer: 808.0\nQuestion: what is the total for two years?\nAnswer: 1567.0\nQuestion: what about the total after including 2011?\nAnswer: 2441.0\nQuestion: what is the average for three years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "813.66667" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 119 implementing further revisions to the capital accord in the u.s . ( such further revisions are commonly referred to as 201cbasel iii 201d ) . basel iii revised basel ii by , among other things , narrowing the definition of capital , and increasing capital requirements for specific exposures . basel iii also includes higher capital ratio requirements and provides that the tier 1 common capital requirement will be increased to 7% ( 7 % ) , comprised of a minimum ratio of 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) plus a 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) capital conservation buffer . implementation of the 7% ( 7 % ) tier 1 common capital requirement is required by january 1 , in addition , global systemically important banks ( 201cgsibs 201d ) will be required to maintain tier 1 common requirements above the 7% ( 7 % ) minimum in amounts ranging from an additional 1% ( 1 % ) to an additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) . in november 2012 , the financial stability board ( 201cfsb 201d ) indicated that it would require the firm , as well as three other banks , to hold the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common ; the requirement will be phased in beginning in 2016 . the basel committee also stated it intended to require certain gsibs to hold an additional 1% ( 1 % ) of tier 1 common under certain circumstances , to act as a disincentive for the gsib from taking actions that would further increase its systemic importance . currently , no gsib ( including the firm ) is required to hold this additional 1% ( 1 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , pursuant to the requirements of the dodd-frank act , u.s . federal banking agencies have proposed certain permanent basel i floors under basel ii and basel iii capital calculations . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of aoci related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules would be 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non- gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts as a key measure to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . december 31 , 2012 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 140342</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>4077</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-453 ( 453 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 143966</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a )</td><td>$ 1647903</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules ( b )</td><td>8.7% ( 8.7 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a ) $ 1647903 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules ( b ) 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) ( a ) key differences in the calculation of risk-weighted assets between basel i and basel iii include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; ( 2 ) basel iii market risk rwa reflects the new capital requirements related to trading assets and securitizations , which include incremental capital requirements for stress var , correlation trading , and re-securitization positions ; and ( 3 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . the actual impact on the firm 2019s capital ratios upon implementation could differ depending on final implementation guidance from the regulators , as well as regulatory approval of certain of the firm 2019s internal risk models . ( b ) the tier 1 common ratio is tier 1 common divided by rwa . the firm 2019s estimate of its tier 1 common ratio under basel iii reflects its current understanding of the basel iii rules based on information currently published by the basel committee and u.s . federal banking agencies and on the application of such rules to its businesses as currently conducted ; it excludes the impact of any changes the firm may make in the future to its businesses as a result of implementing the basel iii rules , possible enhancements to certain market risk models , and any further implementation guidance from the regulators . the basel iii capital requirements are subject to prolonged transition periods . the transition period for banks to meet the tier 1 common requirement under basel iii was originally scheduled to begin in 2013 , with full implementation on january 1 , 2019 . in november 2012 , the u.s . federal banking agencies announced a delay in the implementation dates for the basel iii capital requirements . the additional capital requirements for gsibs will be phased in starting january 1 , 2016 , with full implementation on january 1 , 2019 . management 2019s current objective is for the firm to reach , by the end of 2013 , an estimated basel iii tier i common ratio of 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) . additional information regarding the firm 2019s capital ratios and the federal regulatory capital standards to which it is subject is presented in supervision and regulation on pages 1 20138 of the 2012 form 10-k , and note 28 on pages 306 2013 308 of this annual report . broker-dealer regulatory capital jpmorgan chase 2019s principal u.s . broker-dealer subsidiaries are j.p . morgan securities llc ( 201cjpmorgan securities 201d ) and j.p . morgan clearing corp . ( 201cjpmorgan clearing 201d ) . jpmorgan clearing is a subsidiary of jpmorgan securities and provides clearing and settlement services . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing are each subject to rule 15c3-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 ( the 201cnet capital rule 201d ) . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing are also each registered as futures commission merchants and subject to rule 1.17 of the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing have elected to compute their minimum net capital requirements in accordance with the 201calternative net capital requirements 201d of the net capital rule . at december 31 , 2012 , jpmorgan securities 2019 net capital , as defined by the net capital rule , was $ 13.5 billion , exceeding the minimum requirement by .\nQuestion: for 2012, what was the percentage of the adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans as part of the tier 1 common under basel i rules?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.02905" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nholding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .\nQuestion: what was the change in long-term rate of return on plan assets increase of us plans?\nAnswer: 14.0\nQuestion: and what was it for the uk plans?\nAnswer: 35.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for both of those countries?\nAnswer: 49.0\nQuestion: and what was the long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for the netherlands plans?\nAnswer: 5.0\nQuestion: including the netherlands, what would then be the total long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for the three countries?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "54.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nspecial purpose entity ( 201cspe 201d ) . the spe obtained a term loan and revolving loan commitment from a third party lender , secured by liens on the assets of the spe , to finance the purchase of the accounts receivable , which included a $ 275 million term loan and a $ 25 million revolving loan commitment . the revolving loan commitment may be increased by an additional $ 35 million as amounts are repaid under the term loan . quintilesims has guaranteed the performance of the obligations of existing and future subsidiaries that sell and service the accounts receivable under the receivables financing facility . the assets of the spe are not available to satisfy any of our obligations or any obligations of our subsidiaries . as of december 31 , 2016 , the full $ 25 million of revolving loan commitment was available under the receivables financing facility . we used the proceeds from the term loan under the receivables financing facility to repay in full the amount outstanding on the then outstanding revolving credit facility under its then outstanding senior secured credit agreement ( $ 150 million ) , to repay $ 25 million of the then outstanding term loan b-3 , to pay related fees and expenses and the remainder was used for general working capital purposes . restrictive covenants our debt agreements provide for certain covenants and events of default customary for similar instruments , including a covenant not to exceed a specified ratio of consolidated senior secured net indebtedness to consolidated ebitda , as defined in the senior secured credit facility and a covenant to maintain a specified minimum interest coverage ratio . if an event of default occurs under any of the company 2019s or the company 2019s subsidiaries 2019 financing arrangements , the creditors under such financing arrangements will be entitled to take various actions , including the acceleration of amounts due under such arrangements , and in the case of the lenders under the revolving credit facility and new term loans , other actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor . our long-term debt arrangements contain usual and customary restrictive covenants that , among other things , place limitations on our ability to declare dividends . for additional information regarding these restrictive covenants , see part ii , item 5 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities 2014dividend policy 201d and note 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on form 10-k . at december 31 , 2016 , the company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the company 2019s financing arrangements . years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 cash flow from operating activities . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ 476</td><td>$ 433</td></tr></table> 2016 compared to 2015 cash provided by operating activities increased $ 384 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 . the increase in cash provided by operating activities reflects the increase in net income as adjusted for non-cash items necessary to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities . also contributing to the increase were lower payments for income taxes ( $ 15 million ) , and lower cash used in days sales outstanding ( 201cdso 201d ) and accounts payable and accrued expenses . the lower cash used in dso reflects a two-day increase in dso in 2016 compared to a seven-day increase in dso in 2015 . dso can shift significantly at each reporting period depending on the timing of cash receipts under contractual payment terms relative to the recognition of revenue over a project lifecycle. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 384.0\nQuestion: what is the net cash provided by operating activities in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "476.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npotentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .\nQuestion: what is the value of accrued liabilities in 2006?\nAnswer: 631.0\nQuestion: what about the value of actual expenses?\nAnswer: 240.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of accrued liabilities to actual expenses?\nAnswer: 2.62917\nQuestion: what is the open claims beginning balance in 2006?\nAnswer: 4197.0\nQuestion: what about in 2005?\nAnswer: 4028.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 169.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.04196" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrisks related to our common stock our stock price is extremely volatile . the trading price of our common stock has been extremely volatile and may continue to be volatile in the future . many factors could have an impact on our stock price , including fluctuations in our or our competitors 2019 operating results , clinical trial results or adverse events associated with our products , product development by us or our competitors , changes in laws , including healthcare , tax or intellectual property laws , intellectual property developments , changes in reimbursement or drug pricing , the existence or outcome of litigation or government proceedings , including the sec/doj investigation , failure to resolve , delays in resolving or other developments with respect to the issues raised in the warning letter , acquisitions or other strategic transactions , and the perceptions of our investors that we are not performing or meeting expectations . the trading price of the common stock of many biopharmaceutical companies , including ours , has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations , which have at times been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies whose stocks were affected . anti-takeover provisions in our charter and bylaws and under delaware law could make a third-party acquisition of us difficult and may frustrate any attempt to remove or replace our current management . our corporate charter and by-law provisions may discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change of control that might be beneficial to us or our stockholders . our bylaws provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board , the president , the secretary , or a majority of the board of directors , or upon the written request of stockholders who together own of record 25% ( 25 % ) of the outstanding stock of all classes entitled to vote at such meeting . our bylaws also specify that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors . our charter does not include a provision for cumulative voting for directors , which may have enabled a minority stockholder holding a sufficient percentage of a class of shares to elect one or more directors . under our charter , our board of directors has the authority , without further action by stockholders , to designate up to 5 shares of preferred stock in one or more series . the rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to , and may be adversely affected by , the rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred stock that may be issued in the future . because we are a delaware corporation , the anti-takeover provisions of delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us , even if the change in control would be beneficial to stockholders . we are subject to the provisions of section 203 of the delaware general laws , which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding voting stock , unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . we conduct our primary operations at the owned and leased facilities described below . location operations conducted approximate square feet expiration new haven , connecticut corporate headquarters and executive , sales , research and development offices 514000 2030 dublin , ireland global supply chain , distribution , and administration offices 160000 owned . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>operations conducted</td><td>approximatesquare feet</td><td>leaseexpirationdates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>new haven connecticut</td><td>corporate headquarters and executive sales research and development offices</td><td>514000</td><td>2030</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dublin ireland</td><td>global supply chain distribution and administration offices</td><td>160000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>athlone ireland</td><td>commercial research and development manufacturing</td><td>80000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>lexington massachusetts</td><td>research and development offices</td><td>81000</td><td>2019</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>bogart georgia</td><td>commercial research and development manufacturing</td><td>70000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>smithfield rhode island</td><td>commercial research and development manufacturing</td><td>67000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>zurich switzerland</td><td>regional executive and sales offices</td><td>69000</td><td>2025</td></tr></table> we believe that our administrative office space is adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future . we also believe that our research and development facilities and our manufacturing facilities , together with third party manufacturing facilities , will be adequate for our on-going activities . in addition to the locations above , we also lease space in other u.s . locations and in foreign countries to support our operations as a global organization. .\nQuestion: how many square feet are in new haven?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "514000.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 21871</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>12322</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>9078</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>6381</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>5422</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>30655</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 85729</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s employees from fiscal 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: -1.0\nQuestion: and what was that total expense in 2009?\nAnswer: 21.5\nQuestion: what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2009 amount?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.04651" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense including special items noted below</td><td>$ 27.6</td><td>$ 91.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( \"special items\" )</td><td>7.2</td><td>48.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within \"other non- operating income ( expense ) , net\" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .\nQuestion: what is the expense related to amortization of actuarial losses in 2020?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "105.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhigher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>processing and services revenues</td><td>$ 2458777</td><td>$ 1208430</td><td>$ 892033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of revenues</td><td>1914148</td><td>904124</td><td>667078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross profit</td><td>544629</td><td>304306</td><td>224955</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>171106</td><td>94889</td><td>99581</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>research and development costs</td><td>70879</td><td>85702</td><td>54038</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 302644</td><td>$ 123715</td><td>$ 71336</td></tr></table> revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "123715.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>$ 5951</td><td>$ 5531</td><td>$ 2696</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>4565</td><td>2014</td><td>1463</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>australia</td><td>3567</td><td>1519</td><td>1441</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>netherlands</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>992</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>germany</td><td>2944</td><td>2696</td><td>4217</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cross-border outstandings</td><td>$ 17027</td><td>$ 9746</td><td>$ 10809</td></tr></table> the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) . capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives . regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors . we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements . our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt . the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies . the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board . both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 . state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .\nQuestion: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5951.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nprovision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits</td><td>18</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in permanent reinvestment assertion</td><td>2014</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustments to valuation allowances</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tax law changes</td><td>2014</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>effective income tax rate on continuing operations</td><td>74% ( 74 % )</td><td>61% ( 61 % )</td></tr></table> the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the \"corporate and other unallocated items\" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .\nQuestion: what was the effective income tax rate on continuing operations in 2012?\nAnswer: 74.0\nQuestion: what was the effective income tax rate on continuing operations in 2011?\nAnswer: 61.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of those rates?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "135.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbe adjusted by reference to a grid ( the 201cpricing grid 201d ) based on the consolidated leverage ratio and ranges between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) for adjusted libor loans and 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) to 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) for alternate base rate loans . the weighted average interest rate under the outstanding term loans and revolving credit facility borrowings was 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) and 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company pays a commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the revolving credit facility and certain fees with respect to letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2016 , the commitment fee was 15.0 basis points . since inception , the company incurred and deferred $ 3.9 million in financing costs in connection with the credit agreement . 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior notes in june 2016 , the company issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior unsecured notes due june 15 , 2026 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) . the proceeds were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility . interest is payable semi-annually on june 15 and december 15 beginning december 15 , 2016 . prior to march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or a 201cmake-whole 201d amount applicable to such notes as described in the indenture governing the notes , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . on or after march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants , including limitations that restrict the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create or incur secured indebtedness and enter into sale and leaseback transactions and the company 2019s ability to consolidate , merge or transfer all or substantially all of its properties or assets to another person , in each case subject to material exceptions described in the indenture . the company incurred and deferred $ 5.3 million in financing costs in connection with the notes . other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 42.0 million and $ 44.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) and 1.7% ( 1.7 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>27000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 828250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what percentage do the scheduled maturities of long term debt due in 2019 represent in relation to the total ones?\nAnswer: 0.07606\nQuestion: and what is that percentage representation for the ones due in 2020?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.03018" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis institutional client services our institutional client services segment is comprised of : fixed income , currency and commodities client execution . includes client execution activities related to making markets in interest rate products , credit products , mortgages , currencies and commodities . 2030 interest rate products . government bonds , money market instruments such as commercial paper , treasury bills , repurchase agreements and other highly liquid securities and instruments , as well as interest rate swaps , options and other derivatives . 2030 credit products . investment-grade corporate securities , high-yield securities , credit derivatives , bank and bridge loans , municipal securities , emerging market and distressed debt , and trade claims . 2030 mortgages . commercial mortgage-related securities , loans and derivatives , residential mortgage-related securities , loans and derivatives ( including u.s . government agency-issued collateralized mortgage obligations , other prime , subprime and alt-a securities and loans ) , and other asset-backed securities , loans and derivatives . 2030 currencies . most currencies , including growth-market currencies . 2030 commodities . crude oil and petroleum products , natural gas , base , precious and other metals , electricity , coal , agricultural and other commodity products . equities . includes client execution activities related to making markets in equity products and commissions and fees from executing and clearing institutional client transactions on major stock , options and futures exchanges worldwide , as well as otc transactions . equities also includes our securities services business , which provides financing , securities lending and other prime brokerage services to institutional clients , including hedge funds , mutual funds , pension funds and foundations , and generates revenues primarily in the form of interest rate spreads or fees . the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fixed income currency and commodities client execution</td><td>$ 8461</td><td>$ 8651</td><td>$ 9914</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equities client execution1</td><td>2079</td><td>2594</td><td>3171</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commissions and fees</td><td>3153</td><td>3103</td><td>3053</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities services</td><td>1504</td><td>1373</td><td>1986</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total equities</td><td>6736</td><td>7070</td><td>8210</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>15197</td><td>15721</td><td>18124</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>10880</td><td>11792</td><td>12490</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>pre-tax earnings</td><td>$ 4317</td><td>$ 3929</td><td>$ 5634</td></tr></table> 1 . net revenues related to the americas reinsurance business were $ 317 million for 2013 and $ 1.08 billion for 2012 . in april 2013 , we completed the sale of a majority stake in our americas reinsurance business and no longer consolidate this business . 42 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .\nQuestion: what was the pre-tax earnings at the end of 2014?\nAnswer: 4317.0\nQuestion: what was the pre-tax earnings at the end of 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3929.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii , item 7 until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.74% ( 4.74 % ) . the proceeds from these notes were used to repay commercial paper borrowings . 0160 on april 20 , 2006 , the schlumberger board of directors approved a share repurchase program of up to 40 million shares of common stock to be acquired in the open market before april 2010 , subject to market conditions . this program was completed during the second quarter of 2008 . on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 , of which $ 1.43 billion had been repurchased as of december 31 , 2009 . the following table summarizes the activity under these share repurchase programs during 2009 , 2008 and ( stated in thousands except per share amounts and prices ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total cost of shares purchased</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 500097</td><td>7825.0</td><td>$ 63.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 1818841</td><td>21064.7</td><td>$ 86.35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1355000</td><td>16336.1</td><td>$ 82.95</td></tr></table> 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 5.3 billion in 2009 , $ 6.9 billion in 2008 and $ 6.3 billion in 2007 . the decline in cash flow from operations in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily driven by the decrease in net income experienced in 2009 and the significant pension plan contributions made during 2009 , offset by an improvement in working capital requirements . the improvement in 2008 as compared to 2007 was driven by the net income increase experienced in 2008 offset by required investments in working capital . the reduction in cash flows experienced by some of schlumberger 2019s customers as a result of global economic conditions could have significant adverse effects on their financial condition . this could result in , among other things , delay in , or nonpayment of , amounts that are owed to schlumberger , which could have a material adverse effect on schlumberger 2019s results of operations and cash flows . at times in recent quarters , schlumberger has experienced delays in payments from certain of its customers . schlumberger operates in approximately 80 countries . at december 31 , 2009 , only three of those countries individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one represented greater than 0160 during 2008 and 2007 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved increases in the quarterly dividend of 20% ( 20 % ) and 40% ( 40 % ) , respectively . total dividends paid during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 1.0 billion , $ 964 million and $ 771 million , respectively . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 2.4 billion in 2009 , $ 3.7 billion in 2008 and $ 2.9 billion in 2007 . capital expenditures in 2008 and 2007 reflected the record activity levels experienced in those years . the decrease in capital expenditures in 2009 as compared to 2008 is primarily due to the significant activity decline during 2009 . oilfield services capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 2.4 billion for the full year 2010 as compared to $ 1.9 billion in 2009 and $ 3.0 billion in 2008 . westerngeco capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 0.3 billion for the full year 2010 as compared to $ 0.5 billion in 2009 and $ 0.7 billion in 2008. .\nQuestion: what was the average price paid per share in the year of 2009?\nAnswer: 63.91\nQuestion: and what was that in 2007?\nAnswer: 82.95\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in average price paid per share from 2007 to 2009?\nAnswer: -19.04\nQuestion: what was the average price paid per share in the year of 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "82.95" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2010 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 222 million , $ 211 million , and $ 193 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings were remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 50 million in 2013 , $ 45 million in 2012 , and $ 41 million in 2011 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 787 million in 2013 , $ 890 million in 2012 , and $ 722 million in 2011 . our 2013 net payments reflect a $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarter of 2012 ; our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback claim ; and our 2011 net payments reflect a $ 250 million refund from the irs related to estimated taxes paid for 2010 . as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had federal and foreign taxes receivable of $ 313 million and $ 662 million recorded within other current assets on our balance sheet , primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions in the fourth quarter of 2013 and 2012 and our debt exchange transaction in the fourth quarter of 2012 . note 9 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5642</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>916</td><td>930</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>notes with a rate of 7.38% ( 7.38 % ) due 2013</td><td>2014</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other debt</td><td>476</td><td>478</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7034</td><td>7200</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-882 ( 882 )</td><td>-892 ( 892 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt net of unamortized discounts</td><td>6152</td><td>6308</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>2014</td><td>-150 ( 150 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6152</td><td>$ 6158</td></tr></table> in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in september 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering and in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had in place with a group of banks a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that expires in august 2016 . we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility through december 31 , 2013 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject .\nQuestion: what was the total long term debt in 2013?\nAnswer: 6152.0\nQuestion: what was the total long term debt in 2012?\nAnswer: 6308.0\nQuestion: what was the net difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.97527" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\napple inc . | 2018 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 29 , 2018 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 27 , 2013 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on september 27 , 2013 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2018 s&p dow jones indices llc , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september2013</td><td>september2014</td><td>september2015</td><td>september2016</td><td>september2017</td><td>september2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 173</td><td>$ 174</td><td>$ 242</td><td>$ 359</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 120</td><td>$ 119</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 192</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 162</td><td>$ 209</td><td>$ 275</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 203</td><td>$ 266</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the value of apple inc stock in 2018 less the initial $100 investment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "259.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .\nQuestion: for the two year period ended in 2014, what was the full long-term debt?\nAnswer: 2753.3\nQuestion: and what was the total debt?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3395.3" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe significant changes from december 31 , 2008 to december 31 , 2009 in level 3 assets and liabilities are due to : a net decrease in trading securities of $ 10.8 billion that was driven by : 2022 net transfers of $ 6.5 billion , due mainly to the transfer of debt 2013 securities from level 3 to level 2 due to increased liquidity and pricing transparency ; and net settlements of $ 5.8 billion , due primarily to the liquidations of 2013 subprime securities of $ 4.1 billion . the change in net trading derivatives driven by : 2022 a net loss of $ 4.9 billion relating to complex derivative contracts , 2013 such as those linked to credit , equity and commodity exposures . these losses include both realized and unrealized losses during 2009 and are partially offset by gains recognized in instruments that have been classified in levels 1 and 2 ; and net increase in derivative assets of $ 4.3 billion , which includes cash 2013 settlements of derivative contracts in an unrealized loss position , notably those linked to subprime exposures . the decrease in level 3 investments of $ 6.9 billion primarily 2022 resulted from : a reduction of $ 5.0 billion , due mainly to paydowns on debt 2013 securities and sales of private equity investments ; the net transfer of investment securities from level 3 to level 2 2013 of $ 1.5 billion , due to increased availability of observable pricing inputs ; and net losses recognized of $ 0.4 billion due mainly to losses on non- 2013 marketable equity securities including write-downs on private equity investments . the decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase of 2022 $ 9.1 billion is driven by a $ 8.6 billion net transfers from level 3 to level 2 as effective maturity dates on structured repos have shortened . the decrease in long-term debt of $ 1.5 billion is driven mainly by 2022 $ 1.3 billion of net terminations of structured notes . transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy the company did not have any significant transfers of assets or liabilities between levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during 2010 . items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above . these include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment . in addition , these assets include loans held-for-sale that are measured at locom that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period . the fair value of loans measured on a locom basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices . such loans are generally classified as level 2 of the fair value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes . if no such quoted price exists , the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets , adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan . the following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 : in billions of dollars aggregate cost fair value level 2 level 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>aggregate cost</td><td>fair value</td><td>level 2</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 3.1</td><td>$ 2.5</td><td>$ 0.7</td><td>$ 1.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2.5</td><td>$ 1.6</td><td>$ 0.3</td><td>$ 1.3</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom in 2010?\nAnswer: 2.5\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 1.6\nQuestion: how much, then, did the 2010 total represent in relation to this 2009 one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.5625" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nareas exceeding 14.1 million acres ( 5.7 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods production , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of the temple-inland packaging operations from the date of acquisition in february 2012 and the results of the brazil packaging business from the date of acquisition in january 2013 . in addition , due to the acquisition of a majority share of olmuksa international paper sabanci ambalaj sanayi ve ticaret a.s. , ( now called olmuksan international paper or olmuksan ) net sales for our corrugated packaging business in turkey are included in the business segment totals beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and the operating profits reflect a higher ownership percentage than in previous years . net sales for 2013 increased 12% ( 12 % ) to $ 14.8 billion compared with $ 13.3 billion in 2012 , and 42% ( 42 % ) compared with $ 10.4 billion in 2011 . operating profits were 69% ( 69 % ) higher in 2013 than in 2012 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than in 2011 . excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , the divestiture of three containerboard mills and other special items , operating profits in 2013 were 36% ( 36 % ) higher than in 2012 and 59% ( 59 % ) higher than in 2011 . benefits from the net impact of higher average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix ( $ 749 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 73 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 64 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 16 million ) and higher input costs ( $ 102 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 62 million associated with the integration of temple-inland , a gain of $ 13 million related to a bargain purchase adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey , and a net gain of $ 1 million for other items , while operating profits in 2012 included costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging business of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 14810</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1801</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 1.8 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with the integration of temple-inland and other special items ) compared with $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 . sales volumes decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 reflecting flat demand for boxes and the impact of commercial decisions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher mainly due to the realization of price increases for domestic containerboard and boxes . input costs were higher for wood , energy and recycled fiber . freight costs also increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2012 . manufacturing operating costs decreased , but were offset by inflation and higher overhead and distribution costs . the business took about 850000 tons of total downtime in 2013 of which about 450000 were market- related and 400000 were maintenance downtime . in 2012 , the business took about 945000 tons of total downtime of which about 580000 were market-related and about 365000 were maintenance downtime . operating profits in 2013 included $ 62 million of costs associated with the integration of temple-inland . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . looking ahead to 2014 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to increase for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days offset by the impact from the severe winter weather events impacting much of the u.s . input costs are expected to be higher for energy , recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime spending is expected to be about $ 51 million higher with outages scheduled at six mills compared with four mills in the 2013 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . however , operating profits will be negatively impacted by the adverse winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 . emea industrial packaging net sales in 2013 include the sales of our packaging operations in turkey which are now fully consolidated . net sales were $ 1.3 billion in 2013 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 43 million ( $ 32 .\nQuestion: what is the value of north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012 times 1000?\nAnswer: 11600.0\nQuestion: what was total sales in 2012?\nAnswer: 13280.0\nQuestion: what is the north american sales value over total sales?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.87349" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 831.2</td><td>$ 598.4</td><td>$ 697.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital b2</td><td>-131.1 ( 131.1 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>-293.2 ( 293.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td><td>4.1</td><td>-46.8 ( 46.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 669.5</td><td>$ 592.9</td><td>$ 357.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-200.8 ( 200.8 )</td><td>-224.5 ( 224.5 )</td><td>-210.2 ( 210.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-343.9 ( 343.9 )</td><td>-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )</td><td>131.3</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .\nQuestion: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2014?\nAnswer: 669.5\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\nAnswer: 592.9\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "76.6" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit in 2015?\nAnswer: 1681.0\nQuestion: what was the operating profit in 2014?\nAnswer: 1649.0\nQuestion: what is the sum for 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 3330.0\nQuestion: what is the operating profit in 2103?\nAnswer: 1612.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum?\nAnswer: 4942.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum divided by 3?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1647.33333" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 9 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2009 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 55178</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>45275</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>36841</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>30789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>22094</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>59263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 249440</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 57.2 million , $ 49.0 million and $ 26.6 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2009 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 27.8 million . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the united states of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a united states design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . note 10 . business combinations on october 1 , 2009 , we acquired greenleaf auto recyclers , llc ( 201cgreenleaf 201d ) from ssi for $ 38.8 million , net of cash acquired . greenleaf is the entity through which ssi operated its late model automotive parts recycling business . we recorded a gain on bargain purchase for the greenleaf acquisition totaling $ 4.3 million , which is .\nQuestion: what was the variation in the rental expense for operating leases from 2007 to 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22.4" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nincome tax expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>gaap 2017</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>gaap 2017</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating income ( 1 )</td><td>$ 5272</td><td>$ 4570</td><td>$ 4664</td><td>$ 5287</td><td>$ 4674</td><td>$ 4695</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-69 ( 69 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income before income taxes ( 2 )</td><td>$ 5240</td><td>$ 4462</td><td>$ 4595</td><td>$ 5255</td><td>$ 4566</td><td>$ 4625</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax expense ( 3 )</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 1290</td><td>$ 1250</td><td>$ 1539</td><td>$ 1352</td><td>$ 1312</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate ( 3 )</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td><td>27.2% ( 27.2 % )</td><td>29.3% ( 29.3 % )</td><td>29.6% ( 29.6 % )</td><td>28.4% ( 28.4 % )</td></tr></table> operating income ( 1 ) $ 5272 $ 4570 $ 4664 $ 5287 $ 4674 $ 4695 total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 69 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 70 ) income before income taxes ( 2 ) $ 5240 $ 4462 $ 4595 $ 5255 $ 4566 $ 4625 income tax expense ( 3 ) $ 270 $ 1290 $ 1250 $ 1539 $ 1352 $ 1312 effective tax rate ( 3 ) 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . ( 3 ) gaap income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2017 reflects $ 1.2 billion of a net tax benefit related to the 2017 tax act . the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term . the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s . federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and netherlands . 2017 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 the following amounts related to the 2017 tax act : 2022 $ 106 million tax expense related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax assets ; 2022 $ 1758 million noncash tax benefit related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; 2022 $ 477 million tax expense related to the mandatory deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits . 2022 a noncash expense of $ 16 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities as a result of domestic state and local tax changes ; and 2022 $ 173 million discrete tax benefits , primarily related to stock-based compensation awards , including $ 151 million related to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to stock-based compensation awards . see note 2 , significant accounting policies , for further information . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) for 2017 excluded the noncash deferred tax revaluation benefit of $ 1758 million and noncash expense of $ 16 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . in addition , the deemed repatriation tax expense of $ 477 million has been excluded from the as adjusted results due to the one-time nature and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2016 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2015 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain assets that have equal and offsetting liabilities or noncontrolling interests that ultimately do not have an impact on stockholders 2019 equity or cash flows . management views the as adjusted balance sheet , which contains non-gaap financial measures , as an economic presentation of the company 2019s total assets and liabilities ; however , it does not advocate that investors consider such non-gaap financial measures in isolation from , or as a substitute for , financial information prepared in accordance with gaap . separate account assets and liabilities and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements separate account assets are maintained by blackrock life limited , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company that is a registered life insurance company in the united kingdom , and represent segregated assets held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts . the .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of operating income from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: -94.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.02015" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nforeign currency exchange rate risk many of our non-u.s . companies maintain both assets and liabilities in local currencies . therefore , foreign exchange rate risk is generally limited to net assets denominated in those foreign currencies . foreign exchange rate risk is reviewed as part of our risk management process . locally required capital levels are invested in home currencies in order to satisfy regulatory require- ments and to support local insurance operations regardless of currency fluctuations . the principal currencies creating foreign exchange risk for us are the british pound sterling , the euro , and the canadian dollar . the following table provides more information on our exposure to foreign exchange rate risk at december 31 , 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value of net assets denominated in foreign currencies</td><td>$ 1127</td><td>$ 1651</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percentage of fair value of total net assets</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>9.9% ( 9.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pre-tax impact on equity of hypothetical 10 percent strengthening of the u.s . dollar</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 150</td></tr></table> reinsurance of gmdb and gmib guarantees our net income is directly impacted by changes in the reserves calculated in connection with the reinsurance of variable annuity guarantees , primarily gmdb and gmib . these reserves are calculated in accordance with sop 03-1 ( sop reserves ) and changes in these reserves are reflected as life and annuity benefit expense , which is included in life underwriting income . in addition , our net income is directly impacted by the change in the fair value of the gmib liability ( fvl ) , which is classified as a derivative according to fas 133 . the fair value liability established for a gmib reinsurance contract represents the differ- ence between the fair value of the contract and the sop 03-1 reserves . changes in the fair value of the gmib liability , net of associated changes in the calculated sop 03-1 reserve , are reflected as realized gains or losses . ace views our variable annuity reinsurance business as having a similar risk profile to that of catastrophe reinsurance , with the probability of long-term economic loss relatively small at the time of pricing . adverse changes in market factors and policyholder behavior will have an impact on both life underwriting income and net income . when evaluating these risks , we expect to be compensated for taking both the risk of a cumulative long-term economic net loss , as well as the short-term accounting variations caused by these market movements . therefore , we evaluate this business in terms of its long-term eco- nomic risk and reward . the ultimate risk to the variable annuity guaranty reinsurance business is a long-term underperformance of investment returns , which can be exacerbated by a long-term reduction in interest rates . following a market downturn , continued market underperformance over a period of five to seven years would eventually result in a higher level of paid claims as policyholders accessed their guarantees through death or annuitization . however , if market conditions improved following a downturn , sop 03-1 reserves and fair value liability would fall reflecting a decreased likelihood of future claims , which would result in an increase in both life underwriting income and net income . as of december 31 , 2008 , management established the sop 03-1 reserve based on the benefit ratio calculated using actual market values at december 31 , 2008 . management exercises judgment in determining the extent to which short-term market movements impact the sop 03-1 reserve . the sop 03-1 reserve is based on the calculation of a long-term benefit ratio ( or loss ratio ) for the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance . despite the long-term nature of the risk the benefit ratio calculation is impacted by short-term market movements that may be judged by management to be temporary or transient . management will , in keeping with the language in sop 03-1 , regularly examine both quantitative and qualitative analysis and management will determine if , in its judgment , the change in the calculated benefit ratio is of sufficient magnitude and has persisted for a sufficient duration to warrant a change in the benefit ratio used to establish the sop 03-1 reserve . this has no impact on either premium received or claims paid nor does it impact the long-term profit or loss of the variable annuity guaran- tee reinsurance . the sop 03-1 reserve and fair value liability calculations are directly affected by market factors , including equity levels , interest rate levels , credit risk and implied volatilities , as well as policyholder behaviors , such as annuitization and lapse rates . the table below shows the sensitivity , as of december 31 , 2008 , of the sop 03-1 reserves and fair value liability associated with the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio . in addition , the tables below show the sensitivity of the fair value of specific derivative instruments held ( hedge value ) , which includes instruments purchased in january 2009 , to partially offset the risk in the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio . although these derivatives do not receive hedge accounting treatment , some portion of the change in value may be used to offset changes in the sop 03-1 reserve. .\nQuestion: what was the fair value of net assets denominated in foreign currencies in the year of 2007?\nAnswer: 1127.0\nQuestion: and what was that of 2008?\nAnswer: 1651.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the difference between the fair value net assets denominated in foreign currencies of 2008 and 2007?\nAnswer: -524.0\nQuestion: how much does that difference represent, in percentage, in relation to the fair value of net assets denominated in foreign currencies in the year of 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.31738" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions total 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>other commercial commitmentsmillions</td><td>total</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2013</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2014</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2015</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2016</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2017</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period after 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facilities [a]</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables securitization facility [b]</td><td>600</td><td>600</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>guarantees [c]</td><td>307</td><td>8</td><td>214</td><td>12</td><td>30</td><td>10</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit [d]</td><td>25</td><td>24</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total commercialcommitments</td><td>$ 2732</td><td>$ 632</td><td>$ 215</td><td>$ 1812</td><td>$ 30</td><td>$ 10</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2012 . [b] $ 100 million of the receivables securitization facility was utilized at december 31 , 2012 , which is accounted for as debt . the full program matures in july 2013 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2012 . off-balance sheet arrangements guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2012 , we were contingently liable for $ 307 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 2 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . other matters labor agreements 2013 approximately 86% ( 86 % ) of our 45928 full-time-equivalent employees are represented by 14 major rail unions . during the year , we concluded the most recent round of negotiations , which began in 2010 , with the ratification of new agreements by several unions that continued negotiating into 2012 . all of the unions executed similar multi-year agreements that provide for higher employee cost sharing of employee health and welfare benefits and higher wages . the current agreements will remain in effect until renegotiated under provisions of the railway labor act . the next round of negotiations will begin in early 2015 . inflation 2013 long periods of inflation significantly increase asset replacement costs for capital-intensive companies . as a result , assuming that we replace all operating assets at current price levels , depreciation charges ( on an inflation-adjusted basis ) would be substantially greater than historically reported amounts . derivative financial instruments 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk-management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities. .\nQuestion: what is the value of total commercial commitments?\nAnswer: 2732.0\nQuestion: what about the value of utilizes receivables securitization facility during 2012?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: if receivables securitization facility is excluded what would be the total commercial commitments?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2632.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if sustaining those positions is more likely than not . changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which a change in judgment occurs . the company records penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income taxes in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income . changes in accounting principles business combinations and noncontrolling interests on january 1 , 2009 , the company adopted revised principles related to business combinations and noncontrolling interests . the revised principle on business combinations applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control over one or more businesses . it requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date , measured at their fair values as of that date . business combinations achieved in stages require recognition of the identifiable assets and liabilities , as well as the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree , at the full amounts of their fair values when control is obtained . this revision also changes the requirements for recognizing assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies , and requires direct acquisition costs to be expensed . in addition , it provides certain changes to income tax accounting for business combinations which apply to both new and previously existing business combinations . in april 2009 , additional guidance was issued which revised certain business combination guidance related to accounting for contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination . the company has adopted this guidance in conjunction with the adoption of the revised principles related to business combinations . the adoption of the revised principles related to business combinations has not had a material impact on the consolidated financial statements . the revised principle related to noncontrolling interests establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . the revised principle clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a separate component of equity in the consolidated statements of financial position . the revised principle requires retrospective adjustments , for all periods presented , of stockholders 2019 equity and net income for noncontrolling interests . in addition to these financial reporting changes , the revised principle provides for significant changes in accounting related to changes in ownership of noncontrolling interests . changes in aon 2019s controlling financial interests in consolidated subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions similar to treasury stock transactions . if a change in ownership of a consolidated subsidiary results in a loss of control and deconsolidation , any retained ownership interests are remeasured at fair value with the gain or loss reported in net income . in previous periods , noncontrolling interests for operating subsidiaries were reported in other general expenses in the consolidated statements of income . prior period amounts have been restated to conform to the current year 2019s presentation . the principal effect on the prior years 2019 balance sheets related to the adoption of the new guidance related to noncontrolling interests is summarized as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity as previously reported</td><td>$ 5310</td><td>$ 6221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase for reclassification of non-controlling interests</td><td>105</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity as adjusted</td><td>$ 5415</td><td>$ 6261</td></tr></table> the revised principle also requires that net income be adjusted to include the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests and a new separate caption for net income attributable to aon stockholders be presented in the consolidated statements of income . the adoption of this new guidance increased net income by $ 16 million and $ 13 million for 2008 and 2007 , respectively . net .\nQuestion: what was the reclassification of non-controlling interests in 2008?\nAnswer: 105.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "40.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nindemnification and repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . in connection with pooled settlements , we typically do not repurchase loans and the consummation of such transactions generally results in us no longer having indemnification and repurchase exposure with the investor in the transaction . for the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables below , a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels . in certain instances when indemnification or repurchase claims are settled for these types of sold loans , we have recourse back to the correspondent lenders , brokers and other third-parties ( e.g. , contract underwriting companies , closing agents , appraisers , etc. ) . depending on the underlying reason for the investor claim , we determine our ability to pursue recourse with these parties and file claims with them accordingly . our historical recourse recovery rate has been insignificant as our efforts have been impacted by the inability of such parties to reimburse us for their recourse obligations ( e.g. , their capital availability or whether they remain in business ) or factors that limit our ability to pursue recourse from these parties ( e.g. , contractual loss caps , statutes of limitations ) . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity , and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second- lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made , demand patterns observed to date and/or expected in the future , and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . to estimate the mortgage repurchase liability arising from breaches of representations and warranties , we consider the following factors : ( i ) borrower performance in our historically sold portfolio ( both actual and estimated future defaults ) , ( ii ) the level of outstanding unresolved repurchase claims , ( iii ) estimated probable future repurchase claims , considering information about file requests , delinquent and liquidated loans , resolved and unresolved mortgage insurance rescission notices and our historical experience with claim rescissions , ( iv ) the potential ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase claims ( 201crescission rate 201d ) , and ( v ) the estimated severity of loss upon repurchase of the loan or collateral , make-whole settlement , or indemnification . see note 24 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . the following tables present the unpaid principal balance of repurchase claims by vintage and total unresolved repurchase claims for the past five quarters . table 28 : analysis of quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims by vintage dollars in millions december 31 september 30 june 30 march 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>june 30 2012</td><td>march 31 2012</td><td>december 312011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004 & prior</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 15</td><td>$ 31</td><td>$ 10</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>8</td><td>10</td><td>19</td><td>12</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>23</td><td>30</td><td>56</td><td>41</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>45</td><td>137</td><td>182</td><td>100</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2008</td><td>7</td><td>23</td><td>49</td><td>17</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 & prior</td><td>94</td><td>215</td><td>337</td><td>180</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2009 2013 2012</td><td>38</td><td>52</td><td>42</td><td>33</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 379</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 189</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fnma fhlmc and gnma % ( % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td><td>87% ( 87 % )</td><td>86% ( 86 % )</td><td>88% ( 88 % )</td><td>91% ( 91 % )</td></tr></table> the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 79 .\nQuestion: what was the total of originations for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims in the second quarter of 2006?\nAnswer: 41.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the first quarter?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "28.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action applicable to gs bank usa , in order to meet the quantitative requirements for being a 201cwell-capitalized 201d depository institution , gs bank usa is required to maintain a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) . gs bank usa agreed with the federal reserve board to maintain minimum capital ratios in excess of these 201cwell- capitalized 201d levels . accordingly , for a period of time , gs bank usa is expected to maintain a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8% ( 8 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 11% ( 11 % ) and a tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) . as noted in the table below , gs bank usa was in compliance with these minimum capital requirements as of december 2013 and december 2012 . the table below presents information regarding gs bank usa 2019s regulatory capital ratios under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements , which became effective on january 1 , 2013 . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2013</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>$ 20086</td><td>$ 20704</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tier 2 capital</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 20202</td><td>$ 20743</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-weighted assets</td><td>$ 134935</td><td>$ 109669</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>14.9% ( 14.9 % )</td><td>18.9% ( 18.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capital ratio</td><td>15.0% ( 15.0 % )</td><td>18.9% ( 18.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>16.9% ( 16.9 % )</td><td>17.6% ( 17.6 % )</td></tr></table> the revised capital framework described above is also applicable to gs bank usa , which is an advanced approach banking organization under this framework . gs bank usa has also been informed by the federal reserve board that it has completed a satisfactory parallel run , as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to its calculations of rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . under the revised capital framework , as of january 1 , 2014 , gs bank usa became subject to a new minimum cet1 ratio requirement of 4% ( 4 % ) , increasing to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2015 . in addition , the revised capital framework changes the standards for 201cwell-capitalized 201d status under prompt corrective action regulations beginning january 1 , 2015 by , among other things , introducing a cet1 ratio requirement of 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and increasing the tier 1 capital ratio requirement from 6% ( 6 % ) to 8% ( 8 % ) . in addition , commencing january 1 , 2018 , advanced approach banking organizations must have a supplementary leverage ratio of 3% ( 3 % ) or greater . the basel committee published its final guidelines for calculating incremental capital requirements for domestic systemically important banking institutions ( d-sibs ) . these guidelines are complementary to the framework outlined above for g-sibs . the impact of these guidelines on the regulatory capital requirements of gs bank usa will depend on how they are implemented by the banking regulators in the united states . the deposits of gs bank usa are insured by the fdic to the extent provided by law . the federal reserve board requires depository institutions to maintain cash reserves with a federal reserve bank . the amount deposited by the firm 2019s depository institution held at the federal reserve bank was approximately $ 50.39 billion and $ 58.67 billion as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively , which exceeded required reserve amounts by $ 50.29 billion and $ 58.59 billion as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . transactions between gs bank usa and its subsidiaries and group inc . and its subsidiaries and affiliates ( other than , generally , subsidiaries of gs bank usa ) are regulated by the federal reserve board . these regulations generally limit the types and amounts of transactions ( including credit extensions from gs bank usa ) that may take place and generally require those transactions to be on market terms or better to gs bank usa . the firm 2019s principal non-u.s . bank subsidiary , gsib , is a wholly-owned credit institution , regulated by the prudential regulation authority ( pra ) and the financial conduct authority ( fca ) and is subject to minimum capital requirements . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , gsib was in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 193 .\nQuestion: what was the tier capital of 8% numerically, or as a percent of one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0008" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngoodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , significant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid , or inventory , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received , or ibnr , and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , sea- sonality , utilization of healthcare services and other rele- vant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liability for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2006 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the company 2019s medicaid managed care segment gener- ates revenues primarily from premiums received from the states in which it operates health plans . the company receives a fixed premium per member per month pursuant to our state contracts . the company generally receives premium payments during the month it provides services and recognizes premium revenue during the period in which it is obligated to provide services to its members . some states enact premium taxes or similar assessments , collectively premium taxes , and these taxes are recorded as general and administrative expenses . some contracts allow for additional premium related to certain supplemen- tal services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this data . these adjustments have been immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . the company 2019s specialty services segment generates revenues under contracts with state programs , healthcare organizations and other commercial organizations , as well as from our own subsidiaries on market-based terms . revenues are recognized when the related services are provided or as ratably earned over the covered period of service . premium and services revenues collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . for performance-based contracts the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . premiums and service revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and are recorded net of an allowance based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . as the company generally receives payments during the month in which services are provided , the allowance is typically not significant in comparison to total revenues and does not have a material impact on the pres- entation of the financial condition or results of operations . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>512</td><td>80</td><td>407</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-700 ( 700 )</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 155</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under con- tracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2007 and december 31 , 2011 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of georgia , indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 15% ( 15 % ) , 15% ( 15 % ) , 10% ( 10 % ) , 17% ( 17 % ) and 16% ( 16 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 to $ 500 per member , up to an annual maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are responsible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . in addition , bridgeway participates in a risk-sharing program as part of its contract with the state of arizona for the reimbursement of certain contract service costs beyond a monetary threshold . reinsurance recoveries were $ 3674 , $ 4014 , and $ 3730 , in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4842 , $ 4105 , and $ 6724 in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the balance of allowance for uncollectible accounts from 2004 to 2005?\nAnswer: -119.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of allowance for uncollectible accounts at the end of 2004?\nAnswer: 462.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.25758" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2007 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 1817</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>78828</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>13714</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1894998</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2292895</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cash obligations</td><td>$ 4283493</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accreted value of the discount and premium of 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes</td><td>1791</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 4285284</td></tr></table> 4 . acquisitions during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , the company used cash to acquire a total of ( i ) 293 towers and the assets of a structural analysis firm for approximately $ 44.0 million in cash ( ii ) 84 towers and 6 in-building distributed antenna systems for approximately $ 14.3 million and ( iii ) 30 towers for approximately $ 6.0 million in cash , respectively . the tower asset acquisitions were primarily in mexico and brazil under ongoing agreements . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company also completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . pursuant to which the company acquired approximately 7800 towers and 100 in-building distributed antenna systems . under the terms of the merger agreement , in august 2005 , spectrasite , inc . merged with a wholly- owned subsidiary of the company , and each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock converted into the right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s class a common stock . the company issued approximately 169.5 million shares of its class a common stock and reserved for issuance approximately 9.9 million and 6.8 million of class a common stock pursuant to spectrasite , inc . options and warrants , respectively , assumed in the merger . the final allocation of the $ 3.1 billion purchase price is summarized in the company 2019s annual report on form 10-k for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . the acquisitions consummated by the company during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , have been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with sfas no . 141 201cbusiness combinations 201d ( sfas no . 141 ) . the purchase prices have been allocated to the net assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company primarily acquired its tower assets from third parties in one of two types of transactions : the purchase of a business or the purchase of assets . the structure of each transaction affects the way the company allocates purchase price within the consolidated financial statements . in the case of tower assets acquired through the purchase of a business , such as the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , the company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition . the excess of the purchase price paid by the company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill . in the case of an asset purchase , the company first allocates the purchase price to property and equipment for the appraised value of the towers and to identifiable intangible assets ( primarily acquired customer base ) . the company then records any remaining purchase price within intangible assets as a 201cnetwork location intangible . 201d .\nQuestion: what was the total number of towers acquired in the years of 2006 and 2007, combined?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "377.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of litigation reserves during 2012?\nAnswer: 0.5\nQuestion: what was the value of litigation reserves at the start of 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.2" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ne nt e r g y c o r p o r a t i o n a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 7 n an increase of $ 16 million in fossil operating costs due to the purchase of the attala plant in january 2006 and the perryville plant coming online in july 2005 ; n an increase of $ 12 million related to storm reserves . this increase does not include costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita ; and n an increase of $ 12 million due to a return to normal expense patterns in 2006 versus the deferral or capitalization of storm costs in 2005 . other operation and maintenance expenses increased for non- utility nuclear from $ 588 million in 2005 to $ 637 million in 2006 primarily due to the timing of refueling outages , increased benefit and insurance costs , and increased nrc fees . taxes other than income taxes taxes other than income taxes increased for the utility from $ 322 million in 2005 to $ 361 million in 2006 primarily due to an increase in city franchise taxes in arkansas due to a change in 2006 in the accounting for city franchise tax revenues as directed by the apsc . the change results in an increase in taxes other than income taxes with a corresponding increase in rider revenue , resulting in no effect on net income . also contributing to the increase was higher franchise tax expense at entergy gulf states , inc . as a result of higher gross revenues in 2006 and a customer refund in 2005 . other income other income increased for the utility from $ 111 million in 2005 to $ 156 million in 2006 primarily due to carrying charges recorded on storm restoration costs . other income increased for non-utility nuclear primarily due to miscellaneous income of $ 27 million ( $ 16.6 million net-of-tax ) resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when decommissioning of a plant will begin . other income increased for parent & other primarily due to a gain related to its entergy-koch investment of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) in the fourth quarter of 2006 . in 2004 , entergy-koch sold its energy trading and pipeline businesses to third parties . at that time , entergy received $ 862 million of the sales proceeds in the form of a cash distribution by entergy-koch . due to the november 2006 expiration of contingencies on the sale of entergy-koch 2019s trading business , and the corresponding release to entergy-koch of sales proceeds held in escrow , entergy received additional cash distributions of approximately $ 163 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and recorded a gain of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) . entergy expects future cash distributions upon liquidation of the partnership will be less than $ 35 million . interest charges interest charges increased for the utility and parent & other primarily due to additional borrowing to fund the significant storm restoration costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita . discontinued operations in april 2006 , entergy sold the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the electric reliability council of texas ( ercot ) region of texas , and now reports this portion of the business as a discontinued operation . earnings for 2005 were negatively affected by $ 44.8 million ( net-of-tax ) of discontinued operations due to the planned sale . this amount includes a net charge of $ 25.8 million ( net-of-tax ) related to the impairment reserve for the remaining net book value of the competitive retail services business 2019 information technology systems . results for 2006 include an $ 11.1 million gain ( net-of-tax ) on the sale of the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the ercot region of texas . income taxes the effective income tax rates for 2006 and 2005 were 27.6% ( 27.6 % ) and 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) , respectively . the lower effective income tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to tax benefits , net of reserves , resulting from the tax capital loss recognized in connection with the liquidation of entergy power international holdings , entergy 2019s holding company for entergy-koch . also contributing to the lower rate for 2006 is an irs audit settlement that allowed entergy to release from its tax reserves all settled issues relating to 1996-1998 audit cycle . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2006 to 2007 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation 2019s revolving credit facility , along with a decrease in shareholders 2019 equity primarily due to repurchases of common stock . this increase in the debt to capital percentage is in line with entergy 2019s financial and risk management aspirations . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2005 to 2006 is the result of an increase in shareholders 2019 equity , primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>54.6% ( 54.6 % )</td><td>49.4% ( 49.4 % )</td><td>51.5% ( 51.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td><td>52.3% ( 52.3 % )</td><td>53.1% ( 53.1 % )</td></tr></table> net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable , capital lease obligations , preferred stock with sinking fund , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , shareholders 2019 equity , and preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition . m an ag e ment 2019s f i n anc ial d i scuss ion an d an alys is co n t i n u e d .\nQuestion: what is the value of other income in 2006 less the value in 2005?\nAnswer: 45.0\nQuestion: what is the value of other income in 2005?\nAnswer: 111.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.40541" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see \"state and local rate regulation\" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see \"state and local rate regulation\" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .\nQuestion: what was the 2007 net revenue?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "991.1" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements on march 18 , 2008 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 600 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) notes due 2013 ( the 201c2013 notes 201d ) , $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due 2018 ( the 201c2018 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.70% ( 7.70 % ) notes due 2038 ( the 201c2038 notes 201d and , together with the 2013 notes and the 2018 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . the notes were offered by the company pursuant to its existing shelf registration . the proceeds of this offering of $ 1538 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) and additional borrowings of $ 195 million under the 20ac650 million revolving credit facility were used to repay existing debt , including certain short-term debt and the amounts outstanding under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . no further amounts can be borrowed under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . the discount and issuance costs related to the notes , which totaled $ 12 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective lives of the notes . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac1 billion bridge loan agreement 5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 1047</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . commercial paper 5.3% ( 5.3 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>222</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility weighted average 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) as of dec . 31 2008 ( 1 )</td><td>200</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other weighted average 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>362</td><td>154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 784</td><td>$ 1818</td></tr></table> total $ 784 $ 1818 ( 1 ) borrowings under this facility have a term of 30 days and can be rolled over monthly until the facility expires in 2010 . ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2008 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 totaled $ 228 million , $ 102 million and $ 90 million , respectively . rental expense for operating leases was $ 267 million , $ 188 million and $ 161 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 , are ( in millions ) $ 126 in 2009 , $ 107 in 2010 , $ 82 in 2011 , $ 65 in 2012 , $ 51 in 2013 and $ 202 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit of $ 82 million as of december 31 , 2008 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 guarantees outstanding were $ 70 million . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 9 million and $ 3 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 40 million and $ 17 million , as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit or guarantees is likely . 10 . financial instruments , excluding derivative financial instruments included in ppg 2019s financial instrument portfolio are cash and cash equivalents , cash held in escrow , marketable equity securities , company-owned life insurance and short- and long-term debt instruments . the fair values of the financial instruments approximated their carrying values , in the aggregate , except for long-term long-term debt ( excluding capital lease obligations ) , had carrying and fair values totaling $ 3122 million and $ 3035 million , respectively , as of december 31 , 2008 . the corresponding amounts as of december 31 , 2007 , were $ 1201 million and $ 1226 million , respectively . the fair values of the debt instruments were based on discounted cash flows and interest rates currently available to the company for instruments of the same remaining maturities . 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 .\nQuestion: what was the value of interest payments in 2008?\nAnswer: 228.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2007?\nAnswer: 102.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "126.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndepreciation and amortization included in operating segment profit for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>americas</td><td>$ 78.5</td><td>$ 66.9</td><td>$ 56.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>europe</td><td>57.0</td><td>60.7</td><td>46.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia pacific</td><td>25.6</td><td>22.7</td><td>18.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>global operations and corporate functions</td><td>114.0</td><td>79.7</td><td>75.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 275.1</td><td>$ 230.0</td><td>$ 197.4</td></tr></table> 15 . leases future minimum rental commitments under non- cancelable operating leases in effect as of december 31 , 2008 were $ 38.2 million for 2009 , $ 30.1 million for 2010 , $ 20.9 million for 2011 , $ 15.9 million for 2012 , $ 14.3 million for 2013 and $ 29.9 million thereafter . total rent expense for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 aggregated $ 41.4 million , $ 37.1 million and $ 31.1 million , respectively . 16 . commitments and contingencies intellectual property and product liability-related litigation in july 2008 , we temporarily suspended marketing and distribution of the durom bb acetabular component ( durom cup ) in the u.s . to allow us to update product labeling to provide more detailed surgical technique instructions to surgeons and implement a surgical training program in the u.s . following our announcement , product liability lawsuits and other claims have been asserted against us , some of which we have settled . there are a number of claims still pending and we expect additional claims will be submitted . we recorded a provision of $ 47.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 , representing management 2019s estimate of these durom cup-related claims . we increased that provision by $ 21.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 . the provision is limited to revisions within two years of an original surgery that occurred prior to july 2008 . these parameters are consistent with our data which indicates that cup loosenings associated with surgical technique are most likely to occur within that time period . any claims received outside of these defined parameters will be managed in the normal course and reflected in our standard product liability accruals . on february 15 , 2005 , howmedica osteonics corp . filed an action against us and an unrelated party in the united states district court for the district of new jersey alleging infringement of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; 6664308 ; and 6818020 . on june 13 , 2007 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment on the invalidity of the asserted claims of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; and 6664308 by ruling that all of the asserted claims are invalid for indefiniteness . on august 19 , 2008 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment of non- infringement of certain claims of u.s . patent no . 6818020 , reducing the number of claims at issue in the suit to five . we continue to believe that our defenses against infringement of the remaining claims are valid and meritorious , and we intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously . in addition to certain claims related to the durom cup discussed above , we are also subject to product liability and other claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business , for which we maintain insurance , subject to self- insured retention limits . we establish accruals for product liability and other claims in conjunction with outside counsel based on current information and historical settlement information for open claims , related fees and claims incurred but not reported . while it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these cases , it is the opinion of management that , upon ultimate resolution , liabilities from these cases in excess of those recorded , if any , will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . government investigations in march 2005 , the u.s . department of justice through the u.s . attorney 2019s office in newark , new jersey commenced an investigation of us and four other orthopaedic companies pertaining to consulting contracts , professional service agreements and other agreements by which remuneration is provided to orthopaedic surgeons . on september 27 , 2007 , we reached a settlement with the government to resolve all claims related to this investigation . as part of the settlement , we entered into a settlement agreement with the u.s . through the u.s . department of justice and the office of inspector general of the department of health and human services ( the 201coig-hhs 201d ) . in addition , we entered into a deferred prosecution agreement ( the 201cdpa 201d ) with the u.s . attorney 2019s office for the district of new jersey ( the 201cu.s . attorney 201d ) and a corporate integrity agreement ( the 201ccia 201d ) with the oig- hhs . we did not admit any wrongdoing , plead guilty to any criminal charges or pay any criminal fines as part of the settlement . we settled all civil and administrative claims related to the federal investigation by making a settlement payment to the u.s . government of $ 169.5 million . under the terms of the dpa , the u.s . attorney filed a criminal complaint in the u.s . district court for the district of new jersey charging us with conspiracy to commit violations of the anti-kickback statute ( 42 u.s.c . a7 1320a-7b ) during the years 2002 through 2006 . the court deferred prosecution of the criminal complaint during the 18-month term of the dpa . the u.s . attorney will seek dismissal of the criminal complaint after the 18-month period if we comply with the provisions of the dpa . the dpa provides for oversight by a federally-appointed monitor . under the cia , which has a term of five years , we agreed , among other provisions , to continue the operation of our enhanced corporate compliance program , designed to promote compliance with federal healthcare program z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 060000000 ***%%pcmsg|60 |00012|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .\nQuestion: what is the net change in total rent expense from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 4.3\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.1159" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nn o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( c o n t i n u e d ) the realization of this investment gain ( $ 5624 net of the award ) . this award , which will be paid out over a three-year period , is presented as deferred compensation award on the balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2002 , $ 1504 had been paid against this compensation award . 401 ( k ) plan during august 1997 , the company implemented a 401 ( k ) savings/retirement plan ( the 201c401 ( k ) plan 201d ) to cover eligible employees of the company and any designated affiliate . the 401 ( k ) plan permits eligible employees of the company to defer up to 15% ( 15 % ) of their annual compensation , subject to cer- tain limitations imposed by the code . the employees 2019 elec- tive deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401 ( k ) plan . during 2000 , the company amended its 401 ( k ) plan to include a matching contribution , subject to erisa limitations , equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 4% ( 4 % ) of annual compensation deferred by an employee . for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the company made matching contributions of $ 140 , $ 116 and $ 54 , respectively . 18 . commitments and contingencies the company and the operating partnership are not presently involved in any material litigation nor , to their knowledge , is any material litigation threatened against them or their properties , other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business . management believes the costs , if any , incurred by the company and the operating partnership related to this litigation will not materially affect the financial position , operating results or liquidity of the company and the operating partnership . on october 24 , 2001 , an accident occurred at 215 park avenue south , a property which the company manages , but does not own . personal injury claims have been filed against the company and others by 11 persons . the company believes that there is sufficient insurance coverage to cover the cost of such claims , as well as any other personal injury or property claims which may arise . the company has entered into employment agreements with certain executives . six executives have employment agreements which expire between november 2003 and december 2007 . the cash based compensation associated with these employment agreements totals approximately $ 2125 for 2003 . during march 1998 , the company acquired an operating sub-leasehold position at 420 lexington avenue . the oper- ating sub-leasehold position requires annual ground lease payments totaling $ 6000 and sub-leasehold position pay- ments totaling $ 1100 ( excluding an operating sub-lease position purchased january 1999 ) . the ground lease and sub-leasehold positions expire 2008 . the company may extend the positions through 2029 at market rents . the property located at 1140 avenue of the americas operates under a net ground lease ( $ 348 annually ) with a term expiration date of 2016 and with an option to renew for an additional 50 years . the property located at 711 third avenue operates under an operating sub-lease which expires in 2083 . under the sub- lease , the company is responsible for ground rent payments of $ 1600 annually which increased to $ 3100 in july 2001 and will continue for the next ten years . the ground rent is reset after year ten based on the estimated fair market value of the property . in april 1988 , the sl green predecessor entered into a lease agreement for property at 673 first avenue in new york city , which has been capitalized for financial statement purposes . land was estimated to be approximately 70% ( 70 % ) of the fair market value of the property . the portion of the lease attributed to land is classified as an operating lease and the remainder as a capital lease . the initial lease term is 49 years with an option for an additional 26 years . beginning in lease years 11 and 25 , the lessor is entitled to additional rent as defined by the lease agreement . the company continues to lease the 673 first avenue prop- erty which has been classified as a capital lease with a cost basis of $ 12208 and cumulative amortization of $ 3579 and $ 3306 at december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively . the fol- lowing is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital leases and noncancellable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2002 . non-cancellable operating december 31 , capital leases leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>capital leases</td><td>non-cancellable operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 1290</td><td>$ 11982</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004</td><td>1290</td><td>11982</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2005</td><td>1290</td><td>11982</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006</td><td>1322</td><td>11982</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>1416</td><td>11982</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>56406</td><td>296277</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>63014</td><td>356187</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less amount representing interest</td><td>47152</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 15862</td><td>$ 356187</td></tr></table> 19 . financial instruments : derivatives and hedging financial accounting standards board 2019s statement no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 201d ( 201csfas 133 201d ) which became effective january 1 , 2001 requires the company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , f i f t y - t w o s l g r e e n r e a l t y c o r p . .\nQuestion: what is the minimum payment for capital leases due in 2003?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1290.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>138</td><td>185</td><td>229</td><td>266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>99</td><td>116</td><td>148</td><td>187</td><td>199</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 99 116 148 187 199 .\nQuestion: what is the change value of the s&p healthcare index from 2010 to 2015?\nAnswer: 99.0\nQuestion: what is the change in value of the s&p 500 from 2010 to 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "81.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nd u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 2 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements the company recognizes income on long-term construction contracts where the company serves as a general contractor on the percentage of completion method . using this method , profits are recorded on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion of individual contracts , commencing when progress reaches a point where experience is sufficient to estimate final results with reasonable accuracy . that portion of the estimated earnings is accrued on the basis of the company 2019s estimates of the percentage of completion based on contract expenditures incurred and work performed . property sales gains from sales of depreciated property are recognized in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 66 , and are included in earnings from sales of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , in the statement of operations if identified as held for sale prior to adoption of sfas 144 and in discontinued operations if identified as held for sale after adoption of sfas 144 . gains or losses from the sale of property which is considered held for sale in dclp are recognized in accordance with sfas 66 and are included in construction management and development activity income in the statement of operations . net income per common share basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period . diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the sum of net income available for common shares and minority interest in earnings of unitholders , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and units outstanding and dilutive potential common shares for the period . the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income per share ( in thousands ) : the series d convertible preferred stock and the series g convertible preferred limited partner units were anti-dilutive for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 ; therefore , no conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . in september 2002 , the company redeemed the series g convertible preferred units at their par value of $ 35.0 million . a joint venture partner in one of the company 2019s unconsolidated companies has the option to convert a portion of its ownership to company common shares ( see discussion in investments in unconsolidated companies section ) . the effect of the option on earnings per share was dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2001 ; therefore , conversion to common shares is included in weighted dilutive potential common shares . federal income taxes the company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code . to qualify as a reit , the company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of its taxable income to its stockholders . management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain the company 2019s reit status . as a reit , the company is entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends it pays to its shareholders . accordingly , the company generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as it distributes an amount equal to or in excess of its taxable income currently to its stockholders . a reit generally is subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to its shareholders . if the company fails to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , it will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years . reit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes paid by the company . in addition , the company 2019s financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes . as a reit , the company may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if it engages in certain types of transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>basic net income available for common shares</td><td>$ 161272</td><td>$ 229967</td><td>$ 212958</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership net income</td><td>2014</td><td>3423</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>minority interest in earnings of common unitholders</td><td>18568</td><td>32463</td><td>32071</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted net income available for common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>$ 179840</td><td>$ 265853</td><td>$ 245029</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average number of common shares outstanding</td><td>133981</td><td>129660</td><td>126836</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average partnership units outstanding</td><td>15442</td><td>18301</td><td>19070</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>joint venture partner convertible ownership common share equivalents</td><td>2014</td><td>2092</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>dilutive shares for stock-based compensation plans</td><td>1416</td><td>1657</td><td>1535</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares</td><td>150839</td><td>151710</td><td>147441</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the basic net income available in 2001?\nAnswer: 229967.0\nQuestion: what is the basic net income available in 2002?\nAnswer: 161272.0\nQuestion: what is the net difference between 2001 and 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "68695.0" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstate street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 172</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 227</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>132</td><td>151</td><td>153</td><td>171</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>136</td><td>156</td><td>154</td><td>189</td><td>230</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>151</td><td>195</td><td>231</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of state street in 2015?\nAnswer: 148.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\nAnswer: 48.0\nQuestion: what was the 2012 value?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what is the net change divided by the 2012 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.48" } ]

[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nimpairment of long-lived assets , goodwill and intangible assets - we assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on statement 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d a long-lived asset is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value . fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets . we assess our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at least annually based on statement 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d there were no impairment charges resulting from the july 1 , 2007 , impairment tests and no events indicating an impairment have occurred subsequent to that date . an initial assessment is made by comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill , as determined in accordance with statement 142 , to the book value of each reporting unit . if the fair value is less than the book value , an impairment is indicated , and we must perform a second test to measure the amount of the impairment . in the second test , we calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step one of the assessment . if the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill , we will record an impairment charge . at december 31 , 2007 , we had $ 600.7 million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as shown below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oneok partners</td><td>$ 431418</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distribution</td><td>157953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>10255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>1099</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total goodwill</td><td>$ 600725</td></tr></table> ( thousands of dollars ) intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life , while intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized . all intangible assets are subject to impairment testing . our oneok partners segment had $ 443.0 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 , of which $ 287.5 million is being amortized over an aggregate weighted-average period of 40 years , while the remaining balance has an indefinite life . during 2006 , we recorded a goodwill and asset impairment related to oneok partners 2019 black mesa pipeline of $ 8.4 million and $ 3.6 million , respectively , which were recorded as depreciation and amortization . the reduction to our net income , net of minority interests and income taxes , was $ 3.0 million . in the third quarter of 2005 , we made the decision to sell our spring creek power plant , located in oklahoma , and exit the power generation business . in october 2005 , we concluded that our spring creek power plant had been impaired and recorded an impairment expense of $ 52.2 million . this conclusion was based on our statement 144 impairment analysis of the results of operations for this plant through september 30 , 2005 , and also the net sales proceeds from the anticipated sale of the plant . the sale was completed on october 31 , 2006 . this component of our business is accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with statement 144 . see 201cdiscontinued operations 201d on page 46 for additional information . our total unamortized excess cost over underlying fair value of net assets accounted for under the equity method was $ 185.6 million as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 . based on statement 142 , this amount , referred to as equity method goodwill , should continue to be recognized in accordance with apb opinion no . 18 , 201cthe equity method of accounting for investments in common stock . 201d accordingly , we included this amount in investment in unconsolidated affiliates on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets . pension and postretirement employee benefits - we have defined benefit retirement plans covering certain full-time employees . we sponsor welfare plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain employees who retire with at least five years of service . our actuarial consultant calculates the expense and liability related to these plans and uses statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events . these factors include assumptions about the discount rate , expected return on plan assets , rate of future compensation increases , age and employment periods . in determining the projected benefit obligations and costs , assumptions can change from period to period and result in material changes in the costs and liabilities we recognize . see note j of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this annual report on form 10-k for additional information. .\nQuestion: what is the goodwill value from oneok partners?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "431418.0" } ]