messages
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .\nQuestion: what is the goodwill in 2010?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "8.6",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .\nQuestion: what is the goodwill in 2010?\nAnswer: 8.6\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "6.1",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .\nQuestion: what is the goodwill in 2010?\nAnswer: 8.6\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: 6.1\nQuestion: what is the increase?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "2.5",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .\nQuestion: what is the goodwill in 2010?\nAnswer: 8.6\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: 6.1\nQuestion: what is the increase?\nAnswer: 2.5\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.40984",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: be adjusted by reference to a grid ( the 201cpricing grid 201d ) based on the consolidated leverage ratio and ranges between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) for adjusted libor loans and 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) to 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) for alternate base rate loans . the weighted average interest rate under the outstanding term loans and revolving credit facility borrowings was 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) and 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company pays a commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the revolving credit facility and certain fees with respect to letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2016 , the commitment fee was 15.0 basis points . since inception , the company incurred and deferred $ 3.9 million in financing costs in connection with the credit agreement . 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior notes in june 2016 , the company issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior unsecured notes due june 15 , 2026 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) . the proceeds were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility . interest is payable semi-annually on june 15 and december 15 beginning december 15 , 2016 . prior to march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or a 201cmake-whole 201d amount applicable to such notes as described in the indenture governing the notes , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . on or after march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants , including limitations that restrict the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create or incur secured indebtedness and enter into sale and leaseback transactions and the company 2019s ability to consolidate , merge or transfer all or substantially all of its properties or assets to another person , in each case subject to material exceptions described in the indenture . the company incurred and deferred $ 5.3 million in financing costs in connection with the notes . other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 42.0 million and $ 44.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) and 1.7% ( 1.7 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>27000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 828250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the sum of the 2015 and 2016 loan balances?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "86.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: be adjusted by reference to a grid ( the 201cpricing grid 201d ) based on the consolidated leverage ratio and ranges between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) for adjusted libor loans and 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) to 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) for alternate base rate loans . the weighted average interest rate under the outstanding term loans and revolving credit facility borrowings was 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) and 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company pays a commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the revolving credit facility and certain fees with respect to letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2016 , the commitment fee was 15.0 basis points . since inception , the company incurred and deferred $ 3.9 million in financing costs in connection with the credit agreement . 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior notes in june 2016 , the company issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior unsecured notes due june 15 , 2026 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) . the proceeds were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility . interest is payable semi-annually on june 15 and december 15 beginning december 15 , 2016 . prior to march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or a 201cmake-whole 201d amount applicable to such notes as described in the indenture governing the notes , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . on or after march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants , including limitations that restrict the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create or incur secured indebtedness and enter into sale and leaseback transactions and the company 2019s ability to consolidate , merge or transfer all or substantially all of its properties or assets to another person , in each case subject to material exceptions described in the indenture . the company incurred and deferred $ 5.3 million in financing costs in connection with the notes . other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 42.0 million and $ 44.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) and 1.7% ( 1.7 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>27000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 828250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the sum of the 2015 and 2016 loan balances?\nAnswer: 86.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by 3?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "28.66667",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: be adjusted by reference to a grid ( the 201cpricing grid 201d ) based on the consolidated leverage ratio and ranges between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) for adjusted libor loans and 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) to 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) for alternate base rate loans . the weighted average interest rate under the outstanding term loans and revolving credit facility borrowings was 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) and 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company pays a commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the revolving credit facility and certain fees with respect to letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2016 , the commitment fee was 15.0 basis points . since inception , the company incurred and deferred $ 3.9 million in financing costs in connection with the credit agreement . 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior notes in june 2016 , the company issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior unsecured notes due june 15 , 2026 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) . the proceeds were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility . interest is payable semi-annually on june 15 and december 15 beginning december 15 , 2016 . prior to march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or a 201cmake-whole 201d amount applicable to such notes as described in the indenture governing the notes , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . on or after march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants , including limitations that restrict the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create or incur secured indebtedness and enter into sale and leaseback transactions and the company 2019s ability to consolidate , merge or transfer all or substantially all of its properties or assets to another person , in each case subject to material exceptions described in the indenture . the company incurred and deferred $ 5.3 million in financing costs in connection with the notes . other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 42.0 million and $ 44.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) and 1.7% ( 1.7 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>27000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 828250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the sum of the 2015 and 2016 loan balances?\nAnswer: 86.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by 3?\nAnswer: 28.66667\nQuestion: what is 2% of that value?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.57333",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: be adjusted by reference to a grid ( the 201cpricing grid 201d ) based on the consolidated leverage ratio and ranges between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) for adjusted libor loans and 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) to 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) for alternate base rate loans . the weighted average interest rate under the outstanding term loans and revolving credit facility borrowings was 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) and 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company pays a commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the revolving credit facility and certain fees with respect to letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2016 , the commitment fee was 15.0 basis points . since inception , the company incurred and deferred $ 3.9 million in financing costs in connection with the credit agreement . 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior notes in june 2016 , the company issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior unsecured notes due june 15 , 2026 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) . the proceeds were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility . interest is payable semi-annually on june 15 and december 15 beginning december 15 , 2016 . prior to march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or a 201cmake-whole 201d amount applicable to such notes as described in the indenture governing the notes , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . on or after march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants , including limitations that restrict the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create or incur secured indebtedness and enter into sale and leaseback transactions and the company 2019s ability to consolidate , merge or transfer all or substantially all of its properties or assets to another person , in each case subject to material exceptions described in the indenture . the company incurred and deferred $ 5.3 million in financing costs in connection with the notes . other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 42.0 million and $ 44.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) and 1.7% ( 1.7 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>27000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 828250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the sum of the 2015 and 2016 loan balances?\nAnswer: 86.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by 3?\nAnswer: 28.66667\nQuestion: what is 2% of that value?\nAnswer: 0.57333\nQuestion: what is that times 1000000?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "57333.33333",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: secured financing is primarily conducted through citi 2019s broker-dealer subsidiaries to facilitate customer matched-book activity and to efficiently fund a portion of the trading inventory . secured financing appears as a liability on citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet ( 201csecurities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , secured financing was $ 189.6 billion and averaged approximately $ 207 billion during the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 . secured financing at december 31 , 2010 increased by $ 35 billion from $ 154.3 billion at december 31 , 2009 . during the same period , reverse repos and securities borrowing increased by $ 25 billion . the majority of secured financing is collateralized by highly liquid government , government-backed and government agency securities . this collateral comes primarily from citi 2019s trading assets and its secured lending , and is part of citi 2019s client matched-book activity given that citi both borrows and lends similar asset types on a secured basis . the minority of secured financing is collateralized by less liquid collateral , and supports both citi 2019s trading assets as well as the business of secured lending to customers , which is also part of citi 2019s client matched-book activity . the less liquid secured borrowing is carefully calibrated by asset quality , tenor and counterparty exposure , including those that might be sensitive to ratings stresses , in order to increase the reliability of the funding . citi believes there are several potential mitigants available to it in the event of stress on the secured financing markets for less liquid collateral . citi 2019s significant liquidity resources in its non-bank entities as of december 31 , 2010 , supplemented by collateralized liquidity transfers between entities , provide a cushion . within the matched-book activity , the secured lending positions , which are carefully managed in terms of collateral and tenor , could be unwound to provide additional liquidity under stress . citi also has excess funding capacity for less liquid collateral with existing counterparties that can be accessed during potential dislocation . in addition , citi has the ability to adjust the size of select trading books to provide further mitigation . at december 31 , 2010 , commercial paper outstanding for citigroup 2019s non- bank entities and bank subsidiaries , respectively , was as follows : in billions of dollars non-bank bank ( 1 ) citigroup . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>non-bank</td><td>bank</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>total citigroup</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial paper</td><td>$ 9.7</td><td>$ 15.0</td><td>-</td><td>$ 24.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 15 billion of commercial paper related to vies consolidated effective january 1 , 2010 with the adoption of sfas 166/167 . other short-term borrowings of approximately $ 54 billion ( as set forth in the secured financing and short-term borrowings table above ) include $ 42.4 billion of borrowings from banks and other market participants , which includes borrowings from the federal home loan banks . this represented a decrease of approximately $ 11 billion as compared to year-end 2009 . the average balance of borrowings from banks and other market participants for the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 was approximately $ 43 billion . other short-term borrowings also include $ 11.7 billion of broker borrowings at december 31 , 2010 , which averaged approximately $ 13 billion for the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 . see notes 12 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on citigroup 2019s and its affiliates 2019 outstanding long-term debt and short-term borrowings . liquidity transfer between entities liquidity is generally transferable within the non-bank , subject to regulatory restrictions ( if any ) and standard legal terms . similarly , the non-bank can generally transfer excess liquidity into citi 2019s bank subsidiaries , such as citibank , n.a . in addition , citigroup 2019s bank subsidiaries , including citibank , n.a. , can lend to the citigroup parent and broker-dealer in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act . as of december 31 , 2010 , the amount available for lending under section 23a was approximately $ 26.6 billion , provided the funds are collateralized appropriately. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2010, what percentage of commercial paper outstanding was due to non-bank subsidiaries?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.39271",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: secured financing is primarily conducted through citi 2019s broker-dealer subsidiaries to facilitate customer matched-book activity and to efficiently fund a portion of the trading inventory . secured financing appears as a liability on citi 2019s consolidated balance sheet ( 201csecurities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , secured financing was $ 189.6 billion and averaged approximately $ 207 billion during the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 . secured financing at december 31 , 2010 increased by $ 35 billion from $ 154.3 billion at december 31 , 2009 . during the same period , reverse repos and securities borrowing increased by $ 25 billion . the majority of secured financing is collateralized by highly liquid government , government-backed and government agency securities . this collateral comes primarily from citi 2019s trading assets and its secured lending , and is part of citi 2019s client matched-book activity given that citi both borrows and lends similar asset types on a secured basis . the minority of secured financing is collateralized by less liquid collateral , and supports both citi 2019s trading assets as well as the business of secured lending to customers , which is also part of citi 2019s client matched-book activity . the less liquid secured borrowing is carefully calibrated by asset quality , tenor and counterparty exposure , including those that might be sensitive to ratings stresses , in order to increase the reliability of the funding . citi believes there are several potential mitigants available to it in the event of stress on the secured financing markets for less liquid collateral . citi 2019s significant liquidity resources in its non-bank entities as of december 31 , 2010 , supplemented by collateralized liquidity transfers between entities , provide a cushion . within the matched-book activity , the secured lending positions , which are carefully managed in terms of collateral and tenor , could be unwound to provide additional liquidity under stress . citi also has excess funding capacity for less liquid collateral with existing counterparties that can be accessed during potential dislocation . in addition , citi has the ability to adjust the size of select trading books to provide further mitigation . at december 31 , 2010 , commercial paper outstanding for citigroup 2019s non- bank entities and bank subsidiaries , respectively , was as follows : in billions of dollars non-bank bank ( 1 ) citigroup . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>non-bank</td><td>bank</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>total citigroup</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial paper</td><td>$ 9.7</td><td>$ 15.0</td><td>-</td><td>$ 24.7</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 15 billion of commercial paper related to vies consolidated effective january 1 , 2010 with the adoption of sfas 166/167 . other short-term borrowings of approximately $ 54 billion ( as set forth in the secured financing and short-term borrowings table above ) include $ 42.4 billion of borrowings from banks and other market participants , which includes borrowings from the federal home loan banks . this represented a decrease of approximately $ 11 billion as compared to year-end 2009 . the average balance of borrowings from banks and other market participants for the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 was approximately $ 43 billion . other short-term borrowings also include $ 11.7 billion of broker borrowings at december 31 , 2010 , which averaged approximately $ 13 billion for the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 . see notes 12 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on citigroup 2019s and its affiliates 2019 outstanding long-term debt and short-term borrowings . liquidity transfer between entities liquidity is generally transferable within the non-bank , subject to regulatory restrictions ( if any ) and standard legal terms . similarly , the non-bank can generally transfer excess liquidity into citi 2019s bank subsidiaries , such as citibank , n.a . in addition , citigroup 2019s bank subsidiaries , including citibank , n.a. , can lend to the citigroup parent and broker-dealer in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act . as of december 31 , 2010 , the amount available for lending under section 23a was approximately $ 26.6 billion , provided the funds are collateralized appropriately. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2010, what percentage of commercial paper outstanding was due to non-bank subsidiaries?\nAnswer: 0.39271\nQuestion: and what percentage was due to bank subsidiaries?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.60729",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 94% ( 94 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ -20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>$ 20.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>-26.3 ( 26.3 )</td><td>26.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2017 . we had $ 791.0 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2017 and 2016 , we had interest income of $ 19.4 and $ 20.1 , respectively . based on our 2017 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 7.9 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2017 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2017 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , brazilian real and south african rand . based on 2017 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2017 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .\nQuestion: what was the total interest income, in millions, for the years of 2016 and 2017, combined?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "39.5",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 94% ( 94 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ -20.2 ( 20.2 )</td><td>$ 20.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>-26.3 ( 26.3 )</td><td>26.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2017 . we had $ 791.0 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2017 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2017 and 2016 , we had interest income of $ 19.4 and $ 20.1 , respectively . based on our 2017 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 7.9 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2017 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2017 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , brazilian real and south african rand . based on 2017 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2017 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .\nQuestion: what was the total interest income, in millions, for the years of 2016 and 2017, combined?\nAnswer: 39.5\nQuestion: and what was the average interest income between those two years, also in millions?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "19.75",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: income tax expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>gaap 2017</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>gaap 2017</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating income ( 1 )</td><td>$ 5272</td><td>$ 4570</td><td>$ 4664</td><td>$ 5287</td><td>$ 4674</td><td>$ 4695</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-69 ( 69 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income before income taxes ( 2 )</td><td>$ 5240</td><td>$ 4462</td><td>$ 4595</td><td>$ 5255</td><td>$ 4566</td><td>$ 4625</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax expense ( 3 )</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 1290</td><td>$ 1250</td><td>$ 1539</td><td>$ 1352</td><td>$ 1312</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate ( 3 )</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td><td>27.2% ( 27.2 % )</td><td>29.3% ( 29.3 % )</td><td>29.6% ( 29.6 % )</td><td>28.4% ( 28.4 % )</td></tr></table> operating income ( 1 ) $ 5272 $ 4570 $ 4664 $ 5287 $ 4674 $ 4695 total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 69 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 70 ) income before income taxes ( 2 ) $ 5240 $ 4462 $ 4595 $ 5255 $ 4566 $ 4625 income tax expense ( 3 ) $ 270 $ 1290 $ 1250 $ 1539 $ 1352 $ 1312 effective tax rate ( 3 ) 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . ( 3 ) gaap income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2017 reflects $ 1.2 billion of a net tax benefit related to the 2017 tax act . the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term . the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s . federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and netherlands . 2017 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 the following amounts related to the 2017 tax act : 2022 $ 106 million tax expense related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax assets ; 2022 $ 1758 million noncash tax benefit related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; 2022 $ 477 million tax expense related to the mandatory deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits . 2022 a noncash expense of $ 16 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities as a result of domestic state and local tax changes ; and 2022 $ 173 million discrete tax benefits , primarily related to stock-based compensation awards , including $ 151 million related to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to stock-based compensation awards . see note 2 , significant accounting policies , for further information . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) for 2017 excluded the noncash deferred tax revaluation benefit of $ 1758 million and noncash expense of $ 16 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . in addition , the deemed repatriation tax expense of $ 477 million has been excluded from the as adjusted results due to the one-time nature and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2016 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2015 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain assets that have equal and offsetting liabilities or noncontrolling interests that ultimately do not have an impact on stockholders 2019 equity or cash flows . management views the as adjusted balance sheet , which contains non-gaap financial measures , as an economic presentation of the company 2019s total assets and liabilities ; however , it does not advocate that investors consider such non-gaap financial measures in isolation from , or as a substitute for , financial information prepared in accordance with gaap . separate account assets and liabilities and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements separate account assets are maintained by blackrock life limited , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company that is a registered life insurance company in the united kingdom , and represent segregated assets held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts . the .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the value of operating income from 2016 to 2017?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "702.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: income tax expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>gaap 2017</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>gaap 2017</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating income ( 1 )</td><td>$ 5272</td><td>$ 4570</td><td>$ 4664</td><td>$ 5287</td><td>$ 4674</td><td>$ 4695</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-69 ( 69 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income before income taxes ( 2 )</td><td>$ 5240</td><td>$ 4462</td><td>$ 4595</td><td>$ 5255</td><td>$ 4566</td><td>$ 4625</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax expense ( 3 )</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 1290</td><td>$ 1250</td><td>$ 1539</td><td>$ 1352</td><td>$ 1312</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate ( 3 )</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td><td>27.2% ( 27.2 % )</td><td>29.3% ( 29.3 % )</td><td>29.6% ( 29.6 % )</td><td>28.4% ( 28.4 % )</td></tr></table> operating income ( 1 ) $ 5272 $ 4570 $ 4664 $ 5287 $ 4674 $ 4695 total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 69 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 70 ) income before income taxes ( 2 ) $ 5240 $ 4462 $ 4595 $ 5255 $ 4566 $ 4625 income tax expense ( 3 ) $ 270 $ 1290 $ 1250 $ 1539 $ 1352 $ 1312 effective tax rate ( 3 ) 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . ( 3 ) gaap income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2017 reflects $ 1.2 billion of a net tax benefit related to the 2017 tax act . the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term . the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s . federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and netherlands . 2017 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 the following amounts related to the 2017 tax act : 2022 $ 106 million tax expense related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax assets ; 2022 $ 1758 million noncash tax benefit related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; 2022 $ 477 million tax expense related to the mandatory deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits . 2022 a noncash expense of $ 16 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities as a result of domestic state and local tax changes ; and 2022 $ 173 million discrete tax benefits , primarily related to stock-based compensation awards , including $ 151 million related to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to stock-based compensation awards . see note 2 , significant accounting policies , for further information . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) for 2017 excluded the noncash deferred tax revaluation benefit of $ 1758 million and noncash expense of $ 16 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . in addition , the deemed repatriation tax expense of $ 477 million has been excluded from the as adjusted results due to the one-time nature and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2016 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2015 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain assets that have equal and offsetting liabilities or noncontrolling interests that ultimately do not have an impact on stockholders 2019 equity or cash flows . management views the as adjusted balance sheet , which contains non-gaap financial measures , as an economic presentation of the company 2019s total assets and liabilities ; however , it does not advocate that investors consider such non-gaap financial measures in isolation from , or as a substitute for , financial information prepared in accordance with gaap . separate account assets and liabilities and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements separate account assets are maintained by blackrock life limited , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company that is a registered life insurance company in the united kingdom , and represent segregated assets held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts . the .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the value of operating income from 2016 to 2017?\nAnswer: 702.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by the 2016 value?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.15361",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 34| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and is focused on accretive growth . we have continued to operate at a substantially reduced level of new development activity , as compared to recent years , and are focused on the core operations of our existing base of properties . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively ( in thousands ) : dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the 201ccode 201d ) , in order to maintain our reit status . because depreciation and impairments are non-cash expenses , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 0.76 , $ 1.93 and $ 1.91 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors . distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . at december 31 , 2009 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 29321</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>40412</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9321</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 79054</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the dividend payment from 2007 to 2008?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.02",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 34| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and is focused on accretive growth . we have continued to operate at a substantially reduced level of new development activity , as compared to recent years , and are focused on the core operations of our existing base of properties . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively ( in thousands ) : dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the 201ccode 201d ) , in order to maintain our reit status . because depreciation and impairments are non-cash expenses , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 0.76 , $ 1.93 and $ 1.91 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors . distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . at december 31 , 2009 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 29321</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>40412</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9321</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 79054</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the dividend payment from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 0.02\nQuestion: what was the 2007 dividend payment?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1.91",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 34| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and is focused on accretive growth . we have continued to operate at a substantially reduced level of new development activity , as compared to recent years , and are focused on the core operations of our existing base of properties . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively ( in thousands ) : dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the 201ccode 201d ) , in order to maintain our reit status . because depreciation and impairments are non-cash expenses , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 0.76 , $ 1.93 and $ 1.91 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors . distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . at december 31 , 2009 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 29321</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>40412</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9321</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 79054</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the dividend payment from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 0.02\nQuestion: what was the 2007 dividend payment?\nAnswer: 1.91\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.01047",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: on the underlying exposure . for derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash fl ow hedges , the effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassifi ed into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings . hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings . derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in current earnings during the period of change . we may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effect of fl uctuating currency exchange rates ( principally the euro , the british pound , and the japanese yen ) . foreign currency derivatives used for hedging are put in place using the same or like currencies and duration as the underlying exposures . forward contracts are principally used to manage exposures arising from subsidiary trade and loan payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies . these contracts are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in other 2014net . the purchased option contracts are used to hedge anticipated foreign currency transactions , primarily intercompany inventory activities expected to occur within the next year . these contracts are designated as cash fl ow hedges of those future transactions and the impact on earnings is included in cost of sales . we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps as fair value hedges of fi rm commitments . forward and option contracts generally have maturities not exceeding 12 months . in the normal course of business , our operations are exposed to fl uctuations in interest rates . these fl uctuations can vary the costs of fi nancing , investing , and operating . we address a portion of these risks through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative fi nancial instruments . the objective of controlling these risks is to limit the impact of fl uctuations in interest rates on earnings . our primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in short-term u.s . dollar interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate exposures , we strive to achieve an acceptable balance between fi xed and fl oating rate debt and investment positions and may enter into interest rate swaps or collars to help maintain that balance . interest rate swaps or collars that convert our fi xed- rate debt or investments to a fl oating rate are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying instruments . interest rate swaps or collars that convert fl oating rate debt or investments to a fi xed rate are designated as cash fl ow hedg- es . interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments made or received under the swap agreements . goodwill and other intangibles : goodwill is not amortized . all other intangibles arising from acquisitions and research alliances have fi nite lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives , ranging from 5 to 20 years , using the straight-line method . the weighted-average amortization period for developed product technology is approximately 12 years . amortization expense for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 193.4 million , $ 172.8 million , and $ 7.6 million before tax , respectively . the estimated amortization expense for each of the fi ve succeeding years approximates $ 280 million before tax , per year . substantially all of the amortization expense is included in cost of sales . see note 3 for further discussion of goodwill and other intangibles acquired in 2008 and 2007 . goodwill and other intangible assets at december 31 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 1167.5</td><td>$ 745.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed product technology 2014 gross</td><td>3035.4</td><td>1767.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-346.6 ( 346.6 )</td><td>-162.6 ( 162.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>developed product technology 2014 net</td><td>2688.8</td><td>1604.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other intangibles 2014 gross</td><td>243.2</td><td>142.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-38.0 ( 38.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other intangibles 2014 net</td><td>197.8</td><td>104.8</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total intangibles 2014 net</td><td>$ 4054.1</td><td>$ 2455.4</td></tr></table> goodwill and net other intangibles are reviewed to assess recoverability at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . no signifi cant impairments occurred with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets in 2008 , 2007 , or 2006 . property and equipment : property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost . provisions for depreciation of buildings and equipment are computed generally by the straight-line method at rates based on their estimated useful lives ( 12 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 18 years for equipment ) . we review the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the .\nQuestion: what was the change in value for total intangibles 2014 net from 2007 to 2008?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1598.7",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: on the underlying exposure . for derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash fl ow hedges , the effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassifi ed into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings . hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings . derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in current earnings during the period of change . we may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effect of fl uctuating currency exchange rates ( principally the euro , the british pound , and the japanese yen ) . foreign currency derivatives used for hedging are put in place using the same or like currencies and duration as the underlying exposures . forward contracts are principally used to manage exposures arising from subsidiary trade and loan payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies . these contracts are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in other 2014net . the purchased option contracts are used to hedge anticipated foreign currency transactions , primarily intercompany inventory activities expected to occur within the next year . these contracts are designated as cash fl ow hedges of those future transactions and the impact on earnings is included in cost of sales . we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps as fair value hedges of fi rm commitments . forward and option contracts generally have maturities not exceeding 12 months . in the normal course of business , our operations are exposed to fl uctuations in interest rates . these fl uctuations can vary the costs of fi nancing , investing , and operating . we address a portion of these risks through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative fi nancial instruments . the objective of controlling these risks is to limit the impact of fl uctuations in interest rates on earnings . our primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in short-term u.s . dollar interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate exposures , we strive to achieve an acceptable balance between fi xed and fl oating rate debt and investment positions and may enter into interest rate swaps or collars to help maintain that balance . interest rate swaps or collars that convert our fi xed- rate debt or investments to a fl oating rate are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying instruments . interest rate swaps or collars that convert fl oating rate debt or investments to a fi xed rate are designated as cash fl ow hedg- es . interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments made or received under the swap agreements . goodwill and other intangibles : goodwill is not amortized . all other intangibles arising from acquisitions and research alliances have fi nite lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives , ranging from 5 to 20 years , using the straight-line method . the weighted-average amortization period for developed product technology is approximately 12 years . amortization expense for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 193.4 million , $ 172.8 million , and $ 7.6 million before tax , respectively . the estimated amortization expense for each of the fi ve succeeding years approximates $ 280 million before tax , per year . substantially all of the amortization expense is included in cost of sales . see note 3 for further discussion of goodwill and other intangibles acquired in 2008 and 2007 . goodwill and other intangible assets at december 31 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 1167.5</td><td>$ 745.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed product technology 2014 gross</td><td>3035.4</td><td>1767.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-346.6 ( 346.6 )</td><td>-162.6 ( 162.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>developed product technology 2014 net</td><td>2688.8</td><td>1604.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other intangibles 2014 gross</td><td>243.2</td><td>142.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-38.0 ( 38.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other intangibles 2014 net</td><td>197.8</td><td>104.8</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total intangibles 2014 net</td><td>$ 4054.1</td><td>$ 2455.4</td></tr></table> goodwill and net other intangibles are reviewed to assess recoverability at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . no signifi cant impairments occurred with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets in 2008 , 2007 , or 2006 . property and equipment : property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost . provisions for depreciation of buildings and equipment are computed generally by the straight-line method at rates based on their estimated useful lives ( 12 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 18 years for equipment ) . we review the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the .\nQuestion: what was the change in value for total intangibles 2014 net from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 1598.7\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.6511",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: income taxes american water and its subsidiaries participate in a consolidated federal income tax return for u.s . tax purposes . members of the consolidated group are charged with the amount of federal income tax expense determined as if they filed separate returns . certain income and expense items are accounted for in different time periods for financial reporting than for income tax reporting purposes . the company provides deferred income taxes on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements . these deferred income taxes are based on the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these temporary differences are projected to reverse . in addition , the regulated utility subsidiaries recognize regulatory assets and liabilities for the effect on revenues expected to be realized as the tax effects of temporary differences , previously flowed through to customers , reverse . investment tax credits have been deferred by the regulated utility subsidiaries and are being amortized to income over the average estimated service lives of the related assets . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . see note 13 2014income taxes . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other income ( expenses ) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . afudc is summarized in the following table for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowance for other funds used during construction</td><td>$ 19</td><td>$ 15</td><td>$ 13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>allowance for borrowed funds used during construction</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations and the operations of its market-based businesses are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration in 2010 and amended in 2017 required the company to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the company agreed to pay $ 1 million annually commencing in 2010 with the final payment being made in 2021 . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 6 million and less than $ 1 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying .\nQuestion: together, what were the allowance for other funds and for borrowed funds used during construction in 2016?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "21.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: income taxes american water and its subsidiaries participate in a consolidated federal income tax return for u.s . tax purposes . members of the consolidated group are charged with the amount of federal income tax expense determined as if they filed separate returns . certain income and expense items are accounted for in different time periods for financial reporting than for income tax reporting purposes . the company provides deferred income taxes on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements . these deferred income taxes are based on the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these temporary differences are projected to reverse . in addition , the regulated utility subsidiaries recognize regulatory assets and liabilities for the effect on revenues expected to be realized as the tax effects of temporary differences , previously flowed through to customers , reverse . investment tax credits have been deferred by the regulated utility subsidiaries and are being amortized to income over the average estimated service lives of the related assets . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . see note 13 2014income taxes . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other income ( expenses ) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . afudc is summarized in the following table for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowance for other funds used during construction</td><td>$ 19</td><td>$ 15</td><td>$ 13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>allowance for borrowed funds used during construction</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations and the operations of its market-based businesses are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration in 2010 and amended in 2017 required the company to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the company agreed to pay $ 1 million annually commencing in 2010 with the final payment being made in 2021 . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 6 million and less than $ 1 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying .\nQuestion: together, what were the allowance for other funds and for borrowed funds used during construction in 2016?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: and the percentage of this value that was borrowed?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.28571",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe . our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil . 2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements . for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a . risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k . spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc . marathon shareholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held . fractional shares of mpc common stock were not distributed and any fractional share of mpc common stock otherwise issuable to a marathon shareholder was sold in the open market on such shareholder 2019s behalf , and such shareholder received a cash payment with respect to that fractional share . a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off . activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in all periods presented in this annual report on form 10-k ( see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2014note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) . overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years . in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti . during much of 2010 , both wti and brent crude oil monthly average prices remained in the $ 75 to $ 85 per barrel range . crude oil prices reached a low of $ 33.98 in february 2009 , following global demand declines in an economic recession , but recovered quickly ending 2009 at $ 79.36 . the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>111.26</td><td>79.51</td><td>61.49</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a )</td><td>$ 4.04</td><td>$ 4.39</td><td>$ 3.99</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) 111.26 79.51 61.49 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 4.04 $ 4.39 $ 3.99 ( a ) settlement date average . our u.s . crude oil production was approximately 58 percent sour in 2011 and 68 percent in 2010 . sour crude contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does . sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values . our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and brent average prices widened significantly in 2011 to $ 16.15 in comparison to differentials of less than $ 1.00 in 2010 and 2009. .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of the wti crude oil benchmark from 2009 to 2011?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "33.02",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe . our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil . 2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements . for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a . risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k . spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc . marathon shareholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held . fractional shares of mpc common stock were not distributed and any fractional share of mpc common stock otherwise issuable to a marathon shareholder was sold in the open market on such shareholder 2019s behalf , and such shareholder received a cash payment with respect to that fractional share . a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off . activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in all periods presented in this annual report on form 10-k ( see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2014note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) . overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years . in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti . during much of 2010 , both wti and brent crude oil monthly average prices remained in the $ 75 to $ 85 per barrel range . crude oil prices reached a low of $ 33.98 in february 2009 , following global demand declines in an economic recession , but recovered quickly ending 2009 at $ 79.36 . the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>111.26</td><td>79.51</td><td>61.49</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a )</td><td>$ 4.04</td><td>$ 4.39</td><td>$ 3.99</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) 111.26 79.51 61.49 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 4.04 $ 4.39 $ 3.99 ( a ) settlement date average . our u.s . crude oil production was approximately 58 percent sour in 2011 and 68 percent in 2010 . sour crude contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does . sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values . our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and brent average prices widened significantly in 2011 to $ 16.15 in comparison to differentials of less than $ 1.00 in 2010 and 2009. .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of the wti crude oil benchmark from 2009 to 2011?\nAnswer: 33.02\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to the value of the wti crude oil benchmark in 2009?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.53181",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 4694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>231</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>137</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision for regulatory proceedings</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ano decommissioning trust</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 5051</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2010?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "5051.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 4694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>231</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>137</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision for regulatory proceedings</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ano decommissioning trust</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 5051</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2010?\nAnswer: 5051.0\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2009?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "4694.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 4694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>231</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>137</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision for regulatory proceedings</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ano decommissioning trust</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 5051</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2010?\nAnswer: 5051.0\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2009?\nAnswer: 4694.0\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenues?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "357.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 4694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>231</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>137</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision for regulatory proceedings</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ano decommissioning trust</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 5051</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2010?\nAnswer: 5051.0\nQuestion: what was net revenue in 2009?\nAnswer: 4694.0\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenues?\nAnswer: 357.0\nQuestion: what is the value of retail elastic price to the difference in net revenue?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.38375",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the total of berths as of 2011?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "34000.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the total of berths as of 2011?\nAnswer: 34000.0\nQuestion: and what was the average number of those berths per ship?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "3400.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the total of berths as of 2011?\nAnswer: 34000.0\nQuestion: and what was the average number of those berths per ship?\nAnswer: 3400.0\nQuestion: what would, then, be the annual average of berths per ship, considering that they are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between the years of 2012 and 2016?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "850.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 1% ( 1 % ) driven by a favorable foreign currency translation of 2% ( 2 % ) and was partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decline in dispositions , net of acquisitions and other . organic revenue was flat primarily resulting from strong growth in the capital market transactions and advisory business , partially offset by declines in global facultative placements . operating income operating income increased $ 120 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , from 2010 to $ 1.3 billion in 2011 . in 2011 , operating income margins in this segment were 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) , up 70 basis points from 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in 2010 . operating margin improvement was primarily driven by revenue growth , reduced costs of restructuring initiatives and realization of the benefits of those restructuring plans , which was partially offset by the negative impact of expense increases related to investment in the business , lease termination costs , legacy receivables write-off , and foreign currency exchange rates . hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 4501</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>448</td><td>234</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>10.0% ( 10.0 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2011 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . 2022 benefits administration applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and .\nQuestion: what was the net change in operating income from 2010 to 2011?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "214.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 1% ( 1 % ) driven by a favorable foreign currency translation of 2% ( 2 % ) and was partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decline in dispositions , net of acquisitions and other . organic revenue was flat primarily resulting from strong growth in the capital market transactions and advisory business , partially offset by declines in global facultative placements . operating income operating income increased $ 120 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , from 2010 to $ 1.3 billion in 2011 . in 2011 , operating income margins in this segment were 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) , up 70 basis points from 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in 2010 . operating margin improvement was primarily driven by revenue growth , reduced costs of restructuring initiatives and realization of the benefits of those restructuring plans , which was partially offset by the negative impact of expense increases related to investment in the business , lease termination costs , legacy receivables write-off , and foreign currency exchange rates . hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 4501</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>448</td><td>234</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>10.0% ( 10.0 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2011 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . 2022 benefits administration applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and .\nQuestion: what was the net change in operating income from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 214.0\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2010?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "234.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 1% ( 1 % ) driven by a favorable foreign currency translation of 2% ( 2 % ) and was partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decline in dispositions , net of acquisitions and other . organic revenue was flat primarily resulting from strong growth in the capital market transactions and advisory business , partially offset by declines in global facultative placements . operating income operating income increased $ 120 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , from 2010 to $ 1.3 billion in 2011 . in 2011 , operating income margins in this segment were 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) , up 70 basis points from 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in 2010 . operating margin improvement was primarily driven by revenue growth , reduced costs of restructuring initiatives and realization of the benefits of those restructuring plans , which was partially offset by the negative impact of expense increases related to investment in the business , lease termination costs , legacy receivables write-off , and foreign currency exchange rates . hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 4501</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>448</td><td>234</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>10.0% ( 10.0 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2011 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . 2022 benefits administration applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and .\nQuestion: what was the net change in operating income from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 214.0\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2010?\nAnswer: 234.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.91453",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements lending commitments the firm 2019s lending commitments are agreements to lend with fixed termination dates and depend on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to borrowing . these commitments are presented net of amounts syndicated to third parties . the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future cash flows because the firm may syndicate all or substantial additional portions of these commitments . in addition , commitments can expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the counterparty 2019s request . the table below presents information about lending commitments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>held for investment</td><td>$ 120997</td><td>$ 124504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>held for sale</td><td>8602</td><td>9838</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>at fair value</td><td>7983</td><td>9404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 137582</td><td>$ 143746</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 held for investment lending commitments are accounted for on an accrual basis . see note 9 for further information about such commitments . 2030 held for sale lending commitments are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . 2030 gains or losses related to lending commitments at fair value , if any , are generally recorded , net of any fees in other principal transactions . 2030 substantially all lending commitments relates to the firm 2019s investing & lending segment . commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments were primarily extended to investment-grade corporate borrowers . such commitments included $ 93.99 billion as of december 2018 and $ 85.98 billion as of december 2017 , related to relationship lending activities ( principally used for operating and general corporate purposes ) and $ 27.92 billion as of december 2018 and $ 42.41 billion as of december 2017 , related to other investment banking activities ( generally extended for contingent acquisition financing and are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources ) . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . see note 9 for further information about funded loans . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 15.52 billion as of december 2018 and $ 25.70 billion as of december 2017 . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.0 billion , of which $ 550 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of consumer and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.42 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.09 billion as of december 2017 , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 159 .\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments in 2018?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "93.99",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements lending commitments the firm 2019s lending commitments are agreements to lend with fixed termination dates and depend on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to borrowing . these commitments are presented net of amounts syndicated to third parties . the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future cash flows because the firm may syndicate all or substantial additional portions of these commitments . in addition , commitments can expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the counterparty 2019s request . the table below presents information about lending commitments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>held for investment</td><td>$ 120997</td><td>$ 124504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>held for sale</td><td>8602</td><td>9838</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>at fair value</td><td>7983</td><td>9404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 137582</td><td>$ 143746</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 held for investment lending commitments are accounted for on an accrual basis . see note 9 for further information about such commitments . 2030 held for sale lending commitments are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . 2030 gains or losses related to lending commitments at fair value , if any , are generally recorded , net of any fees in other principal transactions . 2030 substantially all lending commitments relates to the firm 2019s investing & lending segment . commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments were primarily extended to investment-grade corporate borrowers . such commitments included $ 93.99 billion as of december 2018 and $ 85.98 billion as of december 2017 , related to relationship lending activities ( principally used for operating and general corporate purposes ) and $ 27.92 billion as of december 2018 and $ 42.41 billion as of december 2017 , related to other investment banking activities ( generally extended for contingent acquisition financing and are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources ) . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . see note 9 for further information about funded loans . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 15.52 billion as of december 2018 and $ 25.70 billion as of december 2017 . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.0 billion , of which $ 550 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of consumer and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.42 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.09 billion as of december 2017 , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 159 .\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments in 2018?\nAnswer: 93.99\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "85.98",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements lending commitments the firm 2019s lending commitments are agreements to lend with fixed termination dates and depend on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to borrowing . these commitments are presented net of amounts syndicated to third parties . the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future cash flows because the firm may syndicate all or substantial additional portions of these commitments . in addition , commitments can expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the counterparty 2019s request . the table below presents information about lending commitments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>held for investment</td><td>$ 120997</td><td>$ 124504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>held for sale</td><td>8602</td><td>9838</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>at fair value</td><td>7983</td><td>9404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 137582</td><td>$ 143746</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 held for investment lending commitments are accounted for on an accrual basis . see note 9 for further information about such commitments . 2030 held for sale lending commitments are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . 2030 gains or losses related to lending commitments at fair value , if any , are generally recorded , net of any fees in other principal transactions . 2030 substantially all lending commitments relates to the firm 2019s investing & lending segment . commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments were primarily extended to investment-grade corporate borrowers . such commitments included $ 93.99 billion as of december 2018 and $ 85.98 billion as of december 2017 , related to relationship lending activities ( principally used for operating and general corporate purposes ) and $ 27.92 billion as of december 2018 and $ 42.41 billion as of december 2017 , related to other investment banking activities ( generally extended for contingent acquisition financing and are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources ) . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . see note 9 for further information about funded loans . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 15.52 billion as of december 2018 and $ 25.70 billion as of december 2017 . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.0 billion , of which $ 550 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of consumer and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.42 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.09 billion as of december 2017 , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 159 .\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments in 2018?\nAnswer: 93.99\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 85.98\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "8.01",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements lending commitments the firm 2019s lending commitments are agreements to lend with fixed termination dates and depend on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to borrowing . these commitments are presented net of amounts syndicated to third parties . the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future cash flows because the firm may syndicate all or substantial additional portions of these commitments . in addition , commitments can expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the counterparty 2019s request . the table below presents information about lending commitments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>held for investment</td><td>$ 120997</td><td>$ 124504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>held for sale</td><td>8602</td><td>9838</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>at fair value</td><td>7983</td><td>9404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 137582</td><td>$ 143746</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 held for investment lending commitments are accounted for on an accrual basis . see note 9 for further information about such commitments . 2030 held for sale lending commitments are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . 2030 gains or losses related to lending commitments at fair value , if any , are generally recorded , net of any fees in other principal transactions . 2030 substantially all lending commitments relates to the firm 2019s investing & lending segment . commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments were primarily extended to investment-grade corporate borrowers . such commitments included $ 93.99 billion as of december 2018 and $ 85.98 billion as of december 2017 , related to relationship lending activities ( principally used for operating and general corporate purposes ) and $ 27.92 billion as of december 2018 and $ 42.41 billion as of december 2017 , related to other investment banking activities ( generally extended for contingent acquisition financing and are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources ) . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . see note 9 for further information about funded loans . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 15.52 billion as of december 2018 and $ 25.70 billion as of december 2017 . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.0 billion , of which $ 550 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of consumer and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.42 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.09 billion as of december 2017 , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 159 .\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments in 2018?\nAnswer: 93.99\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 85.98\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 8.01\nQuestion: what about the net change in the commercial lending commitments held for investment from 2017 to 2018?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-3507.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements lending commitments the firm 2019s lending commitments are agreements to lend with fixed termination dates and depend on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to borrowing . these commitments are presented net of amounts syndicated to third parties . the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future cash flows because the firm may syndicate all or substantial additional portions of these commitments . in addition , commitments can expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the counterparty 2019s request . the table below presents information about lending commitments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>held for investment</td><td>$ 120997</td><td>$ 124504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>held for sale</td><td>8602</td><td>9838</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>at fair value</td><td>7983</td><td>9404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 137582</td><td>$ 143746</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 held for investment lending commitments are accounted for on an accrual basis . see note 9 for further information about such commitments . 2030 held for sale lending commitments are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . 2030 gains or losses related to lending commitments at fair value , if any , are generally recorded , net of any fees in other principal transactions . 2030 substantially all lending commitments relates to the firm 2019s investing & lending segment . commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments were primarily extended to investment-grade corporate borrowers . such commitments included $ 93.99 billion as of december 2018 and $ 85.98 billion as of december 2017 , related to relationship lending activities ( principally used for operating and general corporate purposes ) and $ 27.92 billion as of december 2018 and $ 42.41 billion as of december 2017 , related to other investment banking activities ( generally extended for contingent acquisition financing and are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources ) . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . see note 9 for further information about funded loans . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 15.52 billion as of december 2018 and $ 25.70 billion as of december 2017 . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.0 billion , of which $ 550 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of consumer and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.42 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.09 billion as of december 2017 , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 159 .\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments in 2018?\nAnswer: 93.99\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 85.98\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 8.01\nQuestion: what about the net change in the commercial lending commitments held for investment from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: -3507.0\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments held for investment in 2017?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "124504.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements lending commitments the firm 2019s lending commitments are agreements to lend with fixed termination dates and depend on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to borrowing . these commitments are presented net of amounts syndicated to third parties . the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future cash flows because the firm may syndicate all or substantial additional portions of these commitments . in addition , commitments can expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the counterparty 2019s request . the table below presents information about lending commitments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>held for investment</td><td>$ 120997</td><td>$ 124504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>held for sale</td><td>8602</td><td>9838</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>at fair value</td><td>7983</td><td>9404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 137582</td><td>$ 143746</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 held for investment lending commitments are accounted for on an accrual basis . see note 9 for further information about such commitments . 2030 held for sale lending commitments are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . 2030 gains or losses related to lending commitments at fair value , if any , are generally recorded , net of any fees in other principal transactions . 2030 substantially all lending commitments relates to the firm 2019s investing & lending segment . commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments were primarily extended to investment-grade corporate borrowers . such commitments included $ 93.99 billion as of december 2018 and $ 85.98 billion as of december 2017 , related to relationship lending activities ( principally used for operating and general corporate purposes ) and $ 27.92 billion as of december 2018 and $ 42.41 billion as of december 2017 , related to other investment banking activities ( generally extended for contingent acquisition financing and are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources ) . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . see note 9 for further information about funded loans . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 15.52 billion as of december 2018 and $ 25.70 billion as of december 2017 . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.0 billion , of which $ 550 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of consumer and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.42 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.09 billion as of december 2017 , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 159 .\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments in 2018?\nAnswer: 93.99\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 85.98\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 8.01\nQuestion: what about the net change in the commercial lending commitments held for investment from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: -3507.0\nQuestion: what is the commercial lending commitments held for investment in 2017?\nAnswer: 124504.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-0.02817",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .\nQuestion: what was the total production from canada?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "64.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .\nQuestion: what was the total production from canada?\nAnswer: 64.0\nQuestion: and for north america onshore?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "238.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .\nQuestion: what was the total production from canada?\nAnswer: 64.0\nQuestion: and for north america onshore?\nAnswer: 238.0\nQuestion: so what was the proprtion of production from canada to north america onshore?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.26891",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .\nQuestion: what was the total production from canada?\nAnswer: 64.0\nQuestion: and for north america onshore?\nAnswer: 238.0\nQuestion: so what was the proprtion of production from canada to north america onshore?\nAnswer: 0.26891\nQuestion: and converted to the hundreds?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "26.89076",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: russia and europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper decreased in both europe and russia , reflecting weak economic conditions and soft market demand . in russia , sales prices in rubles increased , but this improvement is masked by the impact of the currency depreciation against the u.s . dollar . input costs were significantly higher for wood in both europe and russia , partially offset by lower chemical costs . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 11 million lower in 2014 than in 2013 . manufacturing and other operating costs were favorable . entering 2015 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , and about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to remain steady in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be lower for oil and wood , partially offset by higher chemicals costs . indian papers net sales were $ 178 million in 2014 , $ 185 million ( $ 174 million excluding excise duties which were included in net sales in 2013 and prior periods ) in 2013 and $ 185 million ( $ 178 million excluding excise duties ) in 2012 . operating profits were $ 8 million ( a loss of $ 12 million excluding a gain related to the resolution of a legal contingency ) in 2014 , a loss of $ 145 million ( a loss of $ 22 million excluding goodwill and trade name impairment charges ) in 2013 and a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 . average sales price realizations improved in 2014 compared with 2013 due to the impact of price increases implemented in 2013 . sales volumes were flat , reflecting weak economic conditions . input costs were higher , primarily for wood . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower in 2014 . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally higher . average sales price realizations are expected to decrease due to competitive pressures . asian printing papers net sales were $ 59 million in 2014 , $ 90 million in 2013 and $ 85 million in 2012 . operating profits were $ 0 million in 2014 and $ 1 million in both 2013 and 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 895 million in 2014 compared with $ 815 million in 2013 and $ 725 million in 2012 . operating profits were $ 57 million in 2014 compared with $ 2 million in 2013 and a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 . sales volumes in 2014 increased from 2013 for both fluff pulp and market pulp reflecting improved market demand . average sales price realizations increased significantly for fluff pulp , while prices for market pulp were also higher . input costs for wood and energy were higher . operating costs were lower , but planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 1 million higher . compared with the fourth quarter of 2014 , sales volumes in the first quarter of 2015 , are expected to decrease for market pulp , but be slightly higher for fluff pulp . average sales price realizations are expected to to be stable for fluff pulp and softwood market pulp , while hardwood market pulp prices are expected to improve . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 13 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2014 . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging products correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2014 decreased 1% ( 1 % ) from 2013 , but increased 7% ( 7 % ) from 2012 . operating profits increased 11% ( 11 % ) from 2013 , but decreased 34% ( 34 % ) from 2012 . excluding sheet plant closure costs , costs associated with the permanent shutdown of a paper machine at our augusta , georgia mill and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business , 2014 operating profits were 11% ( 11 % ) lower than in 2013 , and 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2012 . benefits from higher average sales price realizations and a favorable mix ( $ 60 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 11 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 9 million ) , higher planned maintenance downtime costs ( $ 12 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 43 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2014 include $ 8 million of costs associated with sheet plant closures , while operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 45 million related to the permanent shutdown of a paper machine at our augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3403</td><td>$ 3435</td><td>$ 3170</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>178</td><td>161</td><td>268</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2014 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2013 and $ 2.0 billion in 2012 . operating profits were $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 compared with $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 and $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain associated with the sale of the shorewood business in 2012 ) . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2014 were lower than in 2013 reflecting weaker market demand . the business took about 41000 tons of market-related downtime in 2014 compared with about 24000 tons in 2013 . average sales price realizations increased year- .\nQuestion: what was the value of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2014 multiplied by 1000?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "2000.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: russia and europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper decreased in both europe and russia , reflecting weak economic conditions and soft market demand . in russia , sales prices in rubles increased , but this improvement is masked by the impact of the currency depreciation against the u.s . dollar . input costs were significantly higher for wood in both europe and russia , partially offset by lower chemical costs . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 11 million lower in 2014 than in 2013 . manufacturing and other operating costs were favorable . entering 2015 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , and about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to remain steady in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be lower for oil and wood , partially offset by higher chemicals costs . indian papers net sales were $ 178 million in 2014 , $ 185 million ( $ 174 million excluding excise duties which were included in net sales in 2013 and prior periods ) in 2013 and $ 185 million ( $ 178 million excluding excise duties ) in 2012 . operating profits were $ 8 million ( a loss of $ 12 million excluding a gain related to the resolution of a legal contingency ) in 2014 , a loss of $ 145 million ( a loss of $ 22 million excluding goodwill and trade name impairment charges ) in 2013 and a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 . average sales price realizations improved in 2014 compared with 2013 due to the impact of price increases implemented in 2013 . sales volumes were flat , reflecting weak economic conditions . input costs were higher , primarily for wood . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower in 2014 . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally higher . average sales price realizations are expected to decrease due to competitive pressures . asian printing papers net sales were $ 59 million in 2014 , $ 90 million in 2013 and $ 85 million in 2012 . operating profits were $ 0 million in 2014 and $ 1 million in both 2013 and 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 895 million in 2014 compared with $ 815 million in 2013 and $ 725 million in 2012 . operating profits were $ 57 million in 2014 compared with $ 2 million in 2013 and a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 . sales volumes in 2014 increased from 2013 for both fluff pulp and market pulp reflecting improved market demand . average sales price realizations increased significantly for fluff pulp , while prices for market pulp were also higher . input costs for wood and energy were higher . operating costs were lower , but planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 1 million higher . compared with the fourth quarter of 2014 , sales volumes in the first quarter of 2015 , are expected to decrease for market pulp , but be slightly higher for fluff pulp . average sales price realizations are expected to to be stable for fluff pulp and softwood market pulp , while hardwood market pulp prices are expected to improve . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 13 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2014 . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging products correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2014 decreased 1% ( 1 % ) from 2013 , but increased 7% ( 7 % ) from 2012 . operating profits increased 11% ( 11 % ) from 2013 , but decreased 34% ( 34 % ) from 2012 . excluding sheet plant closure costs , costs associated with the permanent shutdown of a paper machine at our augusta , georgia mill and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business , 2014 operating profits were 11% ( 11 % ) lower than in 2013 , and 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2012 . benefits from higher average sales price realizations and a favorable mix ( $ 60 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 11 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 9 million ) , higher planned maintenance downtime costs ( $ 12 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 43 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2014 include $ 8 million of costs associated with sheet plant closures , while operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 45 million related to the permanent shutdown of a paper machine at our augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3403</td><td>$ 3435</td><td>$ 3170</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>178</td><td>161</td><td>268</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2014 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2013 and $ 2.0 billion in 2012 . operating profits were $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 compared with $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 and $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain associated with the sale of the shorewood business in 2012 ) . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2014 were lower than in 2013 reflecting weaker market demand . the business took about 41000 tons of market-related downtime in 2014 compared with about 24000 tons in 2013 . average sales price realizations increased year- .\nQuestion: what was the value of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2014 multiplied by 1000?\nAnswer: 2000.0\nQuestion: what was total sales in 2014?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "3403.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: russia and europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper decreased in both europe and russia , reflecting weak economic conditions and soft market demand . in russia , sales prices in rubles increased , but this improvement is masked by the impact of the currency depreciation against the u.s . dollar . input costs were significantly higher for wood in both europe and russia , partially offset by lower chemical costs . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 11 million lower in 2014 than in 2013 . manufacturing and other operating costs were favorable . entering 2015 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , and about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to remain steady in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be lower for oil and wood , partially offset by higher chemicals costs . indian papers net sales were $ 178 million in 2014 , $ 185 million ( $ 174 million excluding excise duties which were included in net sales in 2013 and prior periods ) in 2013 and $ 185 million ( $ 178 million excluding excise duties ) in 2012 . operating profits were $ 8 million ( a loss of $ 12 million excluding a gain related to the resolution of a legal contingency ) in 2014 , a loss of $ 145 million ( a loss of $ 22 million excluding goodwill and trade name impairment charges ) in 2013 and a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 . average sales price realizations improved in 2014 compared with 2013 due to the impact of price increases implemented in 2013 . sales volumes were flat , reflecting weak economic conditions . input costs were higher , primarily for wood . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower in 2014 . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally higher . average sales price realizations are expected to decrease due to competitive pressures . asian printing papers net sales were $ 59 million in 2014 , $ 90 million in 2013 and $ 85 million in 2012 . operating profits were $ 0 million in 2014 and $ 1 million in both 2013 and 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 895 million in 2014 compared with $ 815 million in 2013 and $ 725 million in 2012 . operating profits were $ 57 million in 2014 compared with $ 2 million in 2013 and a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 . sales volumes in 2014 increased from 2013 for both fluff pulp and market pulp reflecting improved market demand . average sales price realizations increased significantly for fluff pulp , while prices for market pulp were also higher . input costs for wood and energy were higher . operating costs were lower , but planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 1 million higher . compared with the fourth quarter of 2014 , sales volumes in the first quarter of 2015 , are expected to decrease for market pulp , but be slightly higher for fluff pulp . average sales price realizations are expected to to be stable for fluff pulp and softwood market pulp , while hardwood market pulp prices are expected to improve . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 13 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2014 . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging products correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2014 decreased 1% ( 1 % ) from 2013 , but increased 7% ( 7 % ) from 2012 . operating profits increased 11% ( 11 % ) from 2013 , but decreased 34% ( 34 % ) from 2012 . excluding sheet plant closure costs , costs associated with the permanent shutdown of a paper machine at our augusta , georgia mill and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business , 2014 operating profits were 11% ( 11 % ) lower than in 2013 , and 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2012 . benefits from higher average sales price realizations and a favorable mix ( $ 60 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 11 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 9 million ) , higher planned maintenance downtime costs ( $ 12 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 43 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2014 include $ 8 million of costs associated with sheet plant closures , while operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 45 million related to the permanent shutdown of a paper machine at our augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3403</td><td>$ 3435</td><td>$ 3170</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>178</td><td>161</td><td>268</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2014 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2013 and $ 2.0 billion in 2012 . operating profits were $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 compared with $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 and $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain associated with the sale of the shorewood business in 2012 ) . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2014 were lower than in 2013 reflecting weaker market demand . the business took about 41000 tons of market-related downtime in 2014 compared with about 24000 tons in 2013 . average sales price realizations increased year- .\nQuestion: what was the value of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2014 multiplied by 1000?\nAnswer: 2000.0\nQuestion: what was total sales in 2014?\nAnswer: 3403.0\nQuestion: what percent of total sales were na consumer packaging sales\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.58772",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312014</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>acquisition ( 1 )</td><td>market change</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 183032</td><td>$ 12926</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -6731 ( 6731 )</td><td>$ -3391 ( 3391 )</td><td>$ 185836</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>128611</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td><td>-1308 ( 1308 )</td><td>-1857 ( 1857 )</td><td>125664</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>66194</td><td>3985</td><td>2014</td><td>627</td><td>-6373 ( 6373 )</td><td>64433</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor</td><td>2014</td><td>38</td><td>366</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>403</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>multi-asset</td><td>$ 377837</td><td>$ 17167</td><td>$ 366</td><td>$ -7413 ( 7413 )</td><td>$ -11621 ( 11621 )</td><td>$ 376336</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .\nQuestion: what was the total combined value of the market change and the fx impact in the asset allocation and balanced segment, in millions?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "10122.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312014</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>acquisition ( 1 )</td><td>market change</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 183032</td><td>$ 12926</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -6731 ( 6731 )</td><td>$ -3391 ( 3391 )</td><td>$ 185836</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>128611</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td><td>-1308 ( 1308 )</td><td>-1857 ( 1857 )</td><td>125664</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>66194</td><td>3985</td><td>2014</td><td>627</td><td>-6373 ( 6373 )</td><td>64433</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor</td><td>2014</td><td>38</td><td>366</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>403</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>multi-asset</td><td>$ 377837</td><td>$ 17167</td><td>$ 366</td><td>$ -7413 ( 7413 )</td><td>$ -11621 ( 11621 )</td><td>$ 376336</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .\nQuestion: what was the total combined value of the market change and the fx impact in the asset allocation and balanced segment, in millions?\nAnswer: 10122.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of that asset allocation and balanced segment?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "185836.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312014</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>acquisition ( 1 )</td><td>market change</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 183032</td><td>$ 12926</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -6731 ( 6731 )</td><td>$ -3391 ( 3391 )</td><td>$ 185836</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>128611</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td><td>-1308 ( 1308 )</td><td>-1857 ( 1857 )</td><td>125664</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>66194</td><td>3985</td><td>2014</td><td>627</td><td>-6373 ( 6373 )</td><td>64433</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor</td><td>2014</td><td>38</td><td>366</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>403</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>multi-asset</td><td>$ 377837</td><td>$ 17167</td><td>$ 366</td><td>$ -7413 ( 7413 )</td><td>$ -11621 ( 11621 )</td><td>$ 376336</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .\nQuestion: what was the total combined value of the market change and the fx impact in the asset allocation and balanced segment, in millions?\nAnswer: 10122.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of that asset allocation and balanced segment?\nAnswer: 185836.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of the multi-asset segment?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "376336.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312014</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>acquisition ( 1 )</td><td>market change</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 183032</td><td>$ 12926</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -6731 ( 6731 )</td><td>$ -3391 ( 3391 )</td><td>$ 185836</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>128611</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td><td>-1308 ( 1308 )</td><td>-1857 ( 1857 )</td><td>125664</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>66194</td><td>3985</td><td>2014</td><td>627</td><td>-6373 ( 6373 )</td><td>64433</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor</td><td>2014</td><td>38</td><td>366</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>403</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>multi-asset</td><td>$ 377837</td><td>$ 17167</td><td>$ 366</td><td>$ -7413 ( 7413 )</td><td>$ -11621 ( 11621 )</td><td>$ 376336</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .\nQuestion: what was the total combined value of the market change and the fx impact in the asset allocation and balanced segment, in millions?\nAnswer: 10122.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of that asset allocation and balanced segment?\nAnswer: 185836.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of the multi-asset segment?\nAnswer: 376336.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this multi-asset segment did that asset allocation and balanced one represent?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.4938",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements level 3 rollforward if a derivative was transferred to level 3 during a reporting period , its entire gain or loss for the period is included in level 3 . transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur . in the tables below , negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities . gains and losses on level 3 derivatives should be considered in the context of the following : 2030 a derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input . 2030 if there is one significant level 3 input , the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs ( i.e. , level 1 and level 2 inputs ) is classified as level 3 . 2030 gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1 , level 2 and level 3 cash instruments . as a result , gains/ ( losses ) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm 2019s results of operations , liquidity or capital resources . the tables below present changes in fair value for all derivatives categorized as level 3 as of the end of the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance beginning of year</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net realized gains/ ( losses )</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net unrealized gains/ ( losses ) relating to instruments still held at year-end</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 purchases</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 sales</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 settlements</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers into level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers out of level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance endof year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates 2014 net</td><td>$ -355 ( 355 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 168</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ -86 ( 86 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit 2014 net</td><td>6228</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-977 ( 977 )</td><td>201</td><td>-315 ( 315 )</td><td>-1508 ( 1508 )</td><td>695</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td><td>4176</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currencies 2014 net</td><td>35</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>-419 ( 419 )</td><td>22</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>169</td><td>139</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>-200 ( 200 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodities 2014 net</td><td>-304 ( 304 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>58</td><td>21</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td><td>281</td><td>50</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equities 2014 net</td><td>-1248 ( 1248 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>77</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td><td>1020</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-959 ( 959 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total derivatives 2014 net</td><td>$ 4356</td><td>$ ( 245 ) 1</td><td>$ ( 1372 ) 1</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ -849 ( 849 )</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ -239 ( 239 )</td><td>$ 2991</td></tr></table> 1 . the aggregate amounts include losses of approximately $ 1.29 billion and $ 324 million reported in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions , 201d respectively . the net unrealized loss on level 3 derivatives of $ 1.37 billion for 2013 principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs and was primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives , principally due to the impact of tighter credit spreads , and losses on certain currency derivatives , primarily due to changes in foreign exchange rates . transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of credit derivative assets from level 2 , principally due to reduced transparency of upfront credit points and correlation inputs used to value these derivatives . transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivatives to level 2 , principally due to unobservable credit spread and correlation inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and unobservable inputs not being significant to the net risk of certain portfolios . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 143 .\nQuestion: what was the aggregate amount of losses for 201cmarket making?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1.29",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements level 3 rollforward if a derivative was transferred to level 3 during a reporting period , its entire gain or loss for the period is included in level 3 . transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur . in the tables below , negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities . gains and losses on level 3 derivatives should be considered in the context of the following : 2030 a derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input . 2030 if there is one significant level 3 input , the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs ( i.e. , level 1 and level 2 inputs ) is classified as level 3 . 2030 gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1 , level 2 and level 3 cash instruments . as a result , gains/ ( losses ) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm 2019s results of operations , liquidity or capital resources . the tables below present changes in fair value for all derivatives categorized as level 3 as of the end of the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance beginning of year</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net realized gains/ ( losses )</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net unrealized gains/ ( losses ) relating to instruments still held at year-end</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 purchases</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 sales</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 settlements</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers into level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers out of level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance endof year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates 2014 net</td><td>$ -355 ( 355 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 168</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ -86 ( 86 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit 2014 net</td><td>6228</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-977 ( 977 )</td><td>201</td><td>-315 ( 315 )</td><td>-1508 ( 1508 )</td><td>695</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td><td>4176</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currencies 2014 net</td><td>35</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>-419 ( 419 )</td><td>22</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>169</td><td>139</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>-200 ( 200 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodities 2014 net</td><td>-304 ( 304 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>58</td><td>21</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td><td>281</td><td>50</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equities 2014 net</td><td>-1248 ( 1248 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>77</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td><td>1020</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-959 ( 959 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total derivatives 2014 net</td><td>$ 4356</td><td>$ ( 245 ) 1</td><td>$ ( 1372 ) 1</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ -849 ( 849 )</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ -239 ( 239 )</td><td>$ 2991</td></tr></table> 1 . the aggregate amounts include losses of approximately $ 1.29 billion and $ 324 million reported in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions , 201d respectively . the net unrealized loss on level 3 derivatives of $ 1.37 billion for 2013 principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs and was primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives , principally due to the impact of tighter credit spreads , and losses on certain currency derivatives , primarily due to changes in foreign exchange rates . transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of credit derivative assets from level 2 , principally due to reduced transparency of upfront credit points and correlation inputs used to value these derivatives . transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivatives to level 2 , principally due to unobservable credit spread and correlation inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and unobservable inputs not being significant to the net risk of certain portfolios . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 143 .\nQuestion: what was the aggregate amount of losses for 201cmarket making?\nAnswer: 1.29\nQuestion: and converted to the thousands?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1290.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements level 3 rollforward if a derivative was transferred to level 3 during a reporting period , its entire gain or loss for the period is included in level 3 . transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur . in the tables below , negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities . gains and losses on level 3 derivatives should be considered in the context of the following : 2030 a derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input . 2030 if there is one significant level 3 input , the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs ( i.e. , level 1 and level 2 inputs ) is classified as level 3 . 2030 gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1 , level 2 and level 3 cash instruments . as a result , gains/ ( losses ) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm 2019s results of operations , liquidity or capital resources . the tables below present changes in fair value for all derivatives categorized as level 3 as of the end of the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance beginning of year</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net realized gains/ ( losses )</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net unrealized gains/ ( losses ) relating to instruments still held at year-end</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 purchases</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 sales</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 settlements</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers into level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers out of level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance endof year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates 2014 net</td><td>$ -355 ( 355 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 168</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ -86 ( 86 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit 2014 net</td><td>6228</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-977 ( 977 )</td><td>201</td><td>-315 ( 315 )</td><td>-1508 ( 1508 )</td><td>695</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td><td>4176</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currencies 2014 net</td><td>35</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>-419 ( 419 )</td><td>22</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>169</td><td>139</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>-200 ( 200 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodities 2014 net</td><td>-304 ( 304 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>58</td><td>21</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td><td>281</td><td>50</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equities 2014 net</td><td>-1248 ( 1248 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>77</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td><td>1020</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-959 ( 959 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total derivatives 2014 net</td><td>$ 4356</td><td>$ ( 245 ) 1</td><td>$ ( 1372 ) 1</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ -849 ( 849 )</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ -239 ( 239 )</td><td>$ 2991</td></tr></table> 1 . the aggregate amounts include losses of approximately $ 1.29 billion and $ 324 million reported in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions , 201d respectively . the net unrealized loss on level 3 derivatives of $ 1.37 billion for 2013 principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs and was primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives , principally due to the impact of tighter credit spreads , and losses on certain currency derivatives , primarily due to changes in foreign exchange rates . transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of credit derivative assets from level 2 , principally due to reduced transparency of upfront credit points and correlation inputs used to value these derivatives . transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivatives to level 2 , principally due to unobservable credit spread and correlation inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and unobservable inputs not being significant to the net risk of certain portfolios . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 143 .\nQuestion: what was the aggregate amount of losses for 201cmarket making?\nAnswer: 1.29\nQuestion: and converted to the thousands?\nAnswer: 1290.0\nQuestion: and the value for 201d?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "324.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements level 3 rollforward if a derivative was transferred to level 3 during a reporting period , its entire gain or loss for the period is included in level 3 . transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur . in the tables below , negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities . gains and losses on level 3 derivatives should be considered in the context of the following : 2030 a derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input . 2030 if there is one significant level 3 input , the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs ( i.e. , level 1 and level 2 inputs ) is classified as level 3 . 2030 gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1 , level 2 and level 3 cash instruments . as a result , gains/ ( losses ) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm 2019s results of operations , liquidity or capital resources . the tables below present changes in fair value for all derivatives categorized as level 3 as of the end of the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance beginning of year</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net realized gains/ ( losses )</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net unrealized gains/ ( losses ) relating to instruments still held at year-end</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 purchases</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 sales</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 settlements</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers into level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers out of level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance endof year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates 2014 net</td><td>$ -355 ( 355 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 168</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ -86 ( 86 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit 2014 net</td><td>6228</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-977 ( 977 )</td><td>201</td><td>-315 ( 315 )</td><td>-1508 ( 1508 )</td><td>695</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td><td>4176</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currencies 2014 net</td><td>35</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>-419 ( 419 )</td><td>22</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>169</td><td>139</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>-200 ( 200 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodities 2014 net</td><td>-304 ( 304 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>58</td><td>21</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td><td>281</td><td>50</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equities 2014 net</td><td>-1248 ( 1248 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>77</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td><td>1020</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-959 ( 959 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total derivatives 2014 net</td><td>$ 4356</td><td>$ ( 245 ) 1</td><td>$ ( 1372 ) 1</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ -849 ( 849 )</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ -239 ( 239 )</td><td>$ 2991</td></tr></table> 1 . the aggregate amounts include losses of approximately $ 1.29 billion and $ 324 million reported in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions , 201d respectively . the net unrealized loss on level 3 derivatives of $ 1.37 billion for 2013 principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs and was primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives , principally due to the impact of tighter credit spreads , and losses on certain currency derivatives , primarily due to changes in foreign exchange rates . transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of credit derivative assets from level 2 , principally due to reduced transparency of upfront credit points and correlation inputs used to value these derivatives . transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivatives to level 2 , principally due to unobservable credit spread and correlation inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and unobservable inputs not being significant to the net risk of certain portfolios . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 143 .\nQuestion: what was the aggregate amount of losses for 201cmarket making?\nAnswer: 1.29\nQuestion: and converted to the thousands?\nAnswer: 1290.0\nQuestion: and the value for 201d?\nAnswer: 324.0\nQuestion: and the difference between the 201cmarket making and this value?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "966.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .\nQuestion: what was the total intangibles in 2005?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "2723872.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .\nQuestion: what was the total intangibles in 2005?\nAnswer: 2723872.0\nQuestion: and in 2004?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1502747.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .\nQuestion: what was the total intangibles in 2005?\nAnswer: 2723872.0\nQuestion: and in 2004?\nAnswer: 1502747.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1221125.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .\nQuestion: what was the total intangibles in 2005?\nAnswer: 2723872.0\nQuestion: and in 2004?\nAnswer: 1502747.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\nAnswer: 1221125.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2004 again?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1502747.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .\nQuestion: what was the total intangibles in 2005?\nAnswer: 2723872.0\nQuestion: and in 2004?\nAnswer: 1502747.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\nAnswer: 1221125.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2004 again?\nAnswer: 1502747.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage increase during this time?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.8126",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: compared to earlier levels . the pre-tax non-cash impairments of certain mineral rights and real estate discussed above under the caption fffdland and development impairments fffd are not included in segment income . liquidity and capital resources on january 29 , 2018 , we announced that a definitive agreement had been signed for us to acquire all of the outstanding shares of kapstone for $ 35.00 per share and the assumption of approximately $ 1.36 billion in net debt , for a total enterprise value of approximately $ 4.9 billion . in contemplation of the transaction , on march 6 , 2018 , we issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) senior notes due 2025 and $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) senior notes due 2028 in an unregistered offering pursuant to rule 144a and regulation s under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the fffdsecurities act fffd ) . in addition , on march 7 , 2018 , we entered into the delayed draw credit facilities ( as hereinafter defined ) that provide for $ 3.8 billion of senior unsecured term loans . on november 2 , 2018 , in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition , we drew upon the facility in full . the proceeds of the delayed draw credit facilities ( as hereinafter defined ) and other sources of cash were used to pay the consideration for the kapstone acquisition , to repay certain existing indebtedness of kapstone and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the kapstone acquisition . we fund our working capital requirements , capital expenditures , mergers , acquisitions and investments , restructuring activities , dividends and stock repurchases from net cash provided by operating activities , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our new a/r sales agreement ( as hereinafter defined ) , proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment removed from service and proceeds received in connection with the issuance of debt and equity securities . see fffdnote 13 . debt fffdtt of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . funding for our domestic operations in the foreseeable future is expected to come from sources of liquidity within our domestic operations , including cash and cash equivalents , and available borrowings under our credit facilities . as such , our foreign cash and cash equivalents are not expected to be a key source of liquidity to our domestic operations . at september 30 , 2018 , excluding the delayed draw credit facilities , we had approximately $ 3.2 billion of availability under our committed credit facilities , primarily under our revolving credit facility , the majority of which matures on july 1 , 2022 . this liquidity may be used to provide for ongoing working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes , including acquisitions , dividends and stock repurchases . certain restrictive covenants govern our maximum availability under the credit facilities . we test and report our compliance with these covenants as required and we were in compliance with all of these covenants at september 30 , 2018 . at september 30 , 2018 , we had $ 104.9 million of outstanding letters of credit not drawn cash and cash equivalents were $ 636.8 million at september 30 , 2018 and $ 298.1 million at september 30 , 2017 . we used a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand at september 30 , 2018 in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition . approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of the cash and cash equivalents at september 30 , 2018 were held outside of the u.s . at september 30 , 2018 , total debt was $ 6415.2 million , $ 740.7 million of which was current . at september 30 , 2017 , total debt was $ 6554.8 million , $ 608.7 million of which was current . cash flow activityy . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2017</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2420.9</td><td>$ 1900.5</td><td>$ 1688.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -1298.9 ( 1298.9 )</td><td>$ -1285.8 ( 1285.8 )</td><td>$ -1351.4 ( 1351.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>$ -755.1 ( 755.1 )</td><td>$ -655.4 ( 655.4 )</td><td>$ -231.0 ( 231.0 )</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2018 increased $ 520.4 million from fiscal 2017 primarily due to higher cash earnings and lower cash taxes due to the impact of the tax act . net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2017 increased $ 212.1 million from fiscal 2016 primarily due to a $ 111.6 million net increase in cash flow from working capital changes plus higher after-tax cash proceeds from our land and development segment fffds accelerated monetization . the changes in working capital in fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included a .\nQuestion: what is the sum of cash for operating and investing activities in 2018?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1122.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: compared to earlier levels . the pre-tax non-cash impairments of certain mineral rights and real estate discussed above under the caption fffdland and development impairments fffd are not included in segment income . liquidity and capital resources on january 29 , 2018 , we announced that a definitive agreement had been signed for us to acquire all of the outstanding shares of kapstone for $ 35.00 per share and the assumption of approximately $ 1.36 billion in net debt , for a total enterprise value of approximately $ 4.9 billion . in contemplation of the transaction , on march 6 , 2018 , we issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) senior notes due 2025 and $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) senior notes due 2028 in an unregistered offering pursuant to rule 144a and regulation s under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the fffdsecurities act fffd ) . in addition , on march 7 , 2018 , we entered into the delayed draw credit facilities ( as hereinafter defined ) that provide for $ 3.8 billion of senior unsecured term loans . on november 2 , 2018 , in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition , we drew upon the facility in full . the proceeds of the delayed draw credit facilities ( as hereinafter defined ) and other sources of cash were used to pay the consideration for the kapstone acquisition , to repay certain existing indebtedness of kapstone and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the kapstone acquisition . we fund our working capital requirements , capital expenditures , mergers , acquisitions and investments , restructuring activities , dividends and stock repurchases from net cash provided by operating activities , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our new a/r sales agreement ( as hereinafter defined ) , proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment removed from service and proceeds received in connection with the issuance of debt and equity securities . see fffdnote 13 . debt fffdtt of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . funding for our domestic operations in the foreseeable future is expected to come from sources of liquidity within our domestic operations , including cash and cash equivalents , and available borrowings under our credit facilities . as such , our foreign cash and cash equivalents are not expected to be a key source of liquidity to our domestic operations . at september 30 , 2018 , excluding the delayed draw credit facilities , we had approximately $ 3.2 billion of availability under our committed credit facilities , primarily under our revolving credit facility , the majority of which matures on july 1 , 2022 . this liquidity may be used to provide for ongoing working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes , including acquisitions , dividends and stock repurchases . certain restrictive covenants govern our maximum availability under the credit facilities . we test and report our compliance with these covenants as required and we were in compliance with all of these covenants at september 30 , 2018 . at september 30 , 2018 , we had $ 104.9 million of outstanding letters of credit not drawn cash and cash equivalents were $ 636.8 million at september 30 , 2018 and $ 298.1 million at september 30 , 2017 . we used a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand at september 30 , 2018 in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition . approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of the cash and cash equivalents at september 30 , 2018 were held outside of the u.s . at september 30 , 2018 , total debt was $ 6415.2 million , $ 740.7 million of which was current . at september 30 , 2017 , total debt was $ 6554.8 million , $ 608.7 million of which was current . cash flow activityy . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2017</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2420.9</td><td>$ 1900.5</td><td>$ 1688.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -1298.9 ( 1298.9 )</td><td>$ -1285.8 ( 1285.8 )</td><td>$ -1351.4 ( 1351.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>$ -755.1 ( 755.1 )</td><td>$ -655.4 ( 655.4 )</td><td>$ -231.0 ( 231.0 )</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2018 increased $ 520.4 million from fiscal 2017 primarily due to higher cash earnings and lower cash taxes due to the impact of the tax act . net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2017 increased $ 212.1 million from fiscal 2016 primarily due to a $ 111.6 million net increase in cash flow from working capital changes plus higher after-tax cash proceeds from our land and development segment fffds accelerated monetization . the changes in working capital in fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included a .\nQuestion: what is the sum of cash for operating and investing activities in 2018?\nAnswer: 1122.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum including financing activities?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "366.9",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of current assets from 2006 to 2007?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "74.2",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of current assets from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 74.2\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that total in 2006?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.06665",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of current assets from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 74.2\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that total in 2006?\nAnswer: 0.06665\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the change in the total of current liabilities?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-42.8",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of current assets from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 74.2\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that total in 2006?\nAnswer: 0.06665\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the change in the total of current liabilities?\nAnswer: -42.8\nQuestion: what was this total in 2006?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "682.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of current assets from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 74.2\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that total in 2006?\nAnswer: 0.06665\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the change in the total of current liabilities?\nAnswer: -42.8\nQuestion: what was this total in 2006?\nAnswer: 682.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2006 amount?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-0.06276",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .\nQuestion: what is the difference in ccg operating income between 2014 and 2015?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-2161.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .\nQuestion: what is the difference in ccg operating income between 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: -2161.0\nQuestion: and the specific amount for 2014 again?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "10327.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .\nQuestion: what is the difference in ccg operating income between 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: -2161.0\nQuestion: and the specific amount for 2014 again?\nAnswer: 10327.0\nQuestion: so then what is the growth rate over these years?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-0.20926",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .\nQuestion: what is the net outflow as of dec 31, 2017?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "364.3",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .\nQuestion: what is the net outflow as of dec 31, 2017?\nAnswer: 364.3\nQuestion: what about as of dec 31, 2016?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "332.5",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .\nQuestion: what is the net outflow as of dec 31, 2017?\nAnswer: 364.3\nQuestion: what about as of dec 31, 2016?\nAnswer: 332.5\nQuestion: what is the difference?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "31.8",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .\nQuestion: what is the net outflow as of dec 31, 2017?\nAnswer: 364.3\nQuestion: what about as of dec 31, 2016?\nAnswer: 332.5\nQuestion: what is the difference?\nAnswer: 31.8\nQuestion: what is the net outflow as of dec 31, 2016?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "332.5",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .\nQuestion: what is the net outflow as of dec 31, 2017?\nAnswer: 364.3\nQuestion: what about as of dec 31, 2016?\nAnswer: 332.5\nQuestion: what is the difference?\nAnswer: 31.8\nQuestion: what is the net outflow as of dec 31, 2016?\nAnswer: 332.5\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.09564",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: backlog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5596</td><td>$ 5654</td><td>$ 6115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>508</td><td>472</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>8.3% ( 8.3 % )</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 4800</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 6300</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog at year-end in 2015?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "4800.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: backlog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5596</td><td>$ 5654</td><td>$ 6115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>508</td><td>472</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>8.3% ( 8.3 % )</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 4800</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 6300</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog at year-end in 2015?\nAnswer: 4800.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "6000.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: backlog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5596</td><td>$ 5654</td><td>$ 6115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>508</td><td>472</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>8.3% ( 8.3 % )</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 4800</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 6300</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog at year-end in 2015?\nAnswer: 4800.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 6000.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total backlog at year-end for the two years?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "10800.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: backlog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5596</td><td>$ 5654</td><td>$ 6115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>508</td><td>472</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>8.3% ( 8.3 % )</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 4800</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 6300</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog at year-end in 2015?\nAnswer: 4800.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 6000.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total backlog at year-end for the two years?\nAnswer: 10800.0\nQuestion: including 2013, what then becomes that total for the three years?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "17100.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: backlog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to higher orders on f-35 and c-130 programs . backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 due to increased volume on the f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by decreased volume on the f-16 program . operating profit is also expected to increase in the low single-digit percentage range , driven by increased volume on the f-35 program offset by contract mix that results in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs 2019 technical services business provides a comprehensive portfolio of technical and sustainment services . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5596</td><td>$ 5654</td><td>$ 6115</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>508</td><td>472</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>8.3% ( 8.3 % )</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 4800</td><td>$ 6000</td><td>$ 6300</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 58 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 395 million as a result of key program completions , lower customer funding levels and increased competition , coupled with the fragmentation of existing large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price when re-competed ( including cms-citic ) . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 230 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 110 million due to the start-up of new programs and growth in recently awarded programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit increased $ 36 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2015 as compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to improved program performance and risk retirements , offset by decreased operating profit resulting from the activities mentioned above for net sales . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 70 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 461 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 475 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to decreased volume in technical services programs reflecting market pressures . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of about $ 330 million due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 26 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million in 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were comparable in 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog at year-end in 2015?\nAnswer: 4800.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 6000.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total backlog at year-end for the two years?\nAnswer: 10800.0\nQuestion: including 2013, what then becomes that total for the three years?\nAnswer: 17100.0\nQuestion: and what is the backlog at year-end between those three years?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "5700.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 317</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>236</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>214</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>later years</td><td>597</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum payments required</td><td>$ 1830</td></tr></table> aon corporation .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the net rent expense of the years 2009 and 2008?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-42.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 317</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>236</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>214</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>later years</td><td>597</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum payments required</td><td>$ 1830</td></tr></table> aon corporation .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the net rent expense of the years 2009 and 2008?\nAnswer: -42.0\nQuestion: how much does that difference represent, percentually, in relation to the net expense in the year of 2008?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-0.13249",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc. , ( the 201ccompany , 201d 201camerican water 201d or 201caww 201d ) is a delaware holding company . american water is the most geographically diversified , as well as the largest publicly-traded , united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . as a holding company , we conduct substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries . our approximately 6400 employees provide an estimated 15 million people with drinking water , wastewater and/or other water-related services in 47 states and one canadian province . operating segments we report our results of operations in two operating segments : the regulated businesses and the market- based operations . additional information with respect to our operating segment results is included in the section entitled 201citem 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d and note 18 of the consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . we report the results of this business in our regulated businesses segment . our subsidiaries that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in economic regulation , hereafter referred to as public utility commissions , or 201cpucs , 201d of the states in which we operate . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . our regulated businesses segment operating revenues were $ 2674.3 million for 2014 , $ 2539.9 for 2013 , $ 2564.4 million for 2012 , accounting for 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) , 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) and 89.9% ( 89.9 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenues , number of customers and an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2014 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 652.3</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.5% ( 24.5 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 648066</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.2% ( 20.2 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.7% ( 22.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>605.4</td><td>22.6% ( 22.6 % )</td><td>666415</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>18.5% ( 18.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>270.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td><td>464498</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>262.3</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>312017</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>california</td><td>209.8</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>174198</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>indiana</td><td>200.6</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>293666</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>127.0</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>170371</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2327.6</td><td>87.0% ( 87.0 % )</td><td>2729231</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.1</td><td>84.9% ( 84.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>346.7</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>489961</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2674.3</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3219192</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.9</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois. .\nQuestion: what is the estimated pennsylvania population?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "2.2",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc. , ( the 201ccompany , 201d 201camerican water 201d or 201caww 201d ) is a delaware holding company . american water is the most geographically diversified , as well as the largest publicly-traded , united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . as a holding company , we conduct substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries . our approximately 6400 employees provide an estimated 15 million people with drinking water , wastewater and/or other water-related services in 47 states and one canadian province . operating segments we report our results of operations in two operating segments : the regulated businesses and the market- based operations . additional information with respect to our operating segment results is included in the section entitled 201citem 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d and note 18 of the consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . we report the results of this business in our regulated businesses segment . our subsidiaries that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in economic regulation , hereafter referred to as public utility commissions , or 201cpucs , 201d of the states in which we operate . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . our regulated businesses segment operating revenues were $ 2674.3 million for 2014 , $ 2539.9 for 2013 , $ 2564.4 million for 2012 , accounting for 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) , 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) and 89.9% ( 89.9 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenues , number of customers and an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2014 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 652.3</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.5% ( 24.5 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 648066</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.2% ( 20.2 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.7% ( 22.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>605.4</td><td>22.6% ( 22.6 % )</td><td>666415</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>18.5% ( 18.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>270.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td><td>464498</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>262.3</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>312017</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>california</td><td>209.8</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>174198</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>indiana</td><td>200.6</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>293666</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>127.0</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>170371</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2327.6</td><td>87.0% ( 87.0 % )</td><td>2729231</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.1</td><td>84.9% ( 84.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>346.7</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>489961</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2674.3</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3219192</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.9</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois. .\nQuestion: what is the estimated pennsylvania population?\nAnswer: 2.2\nQuestion: what is that number times 1000000?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "2200000.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc. , ( the 201ccompany , 201d 201camerican water 201d or 201caww 201d ) is a delaware holding company . american water is the most geographically diversified , as well as the largest publicly-traded , united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . as a holding company , we conduct substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries . our approximately 6400 employees provide an estimated 15 million people with drinking water , wastewater and/or other water-related services in 47 states and one canadian province . operating segments we report our results of operations in two operating segments : the regulated businesses and the market- based operations . additional information with respect to our operating segment results is included in the section entitled 201citem 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d and note 18 of the consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . we report the results of this business in our regulated businesses segment . our subsidiaries that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in economic regulation , hereafter referred to as public utility commissions , or 201cpucs , 201d of the states in which we operate . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . our regulated businesses segment operating revenues were $ 2674.3 million for 2014 , $ 2539.9 for 2013 , $ 2564.4 million for 2012 , accounting for 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) , 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) and 89.9% ( 89.9 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenues , number of customers and an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2014 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 652.3</td><td>% ( % ) of total 24.5% ( 24.5 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 648066</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.2% ( 20.2 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.7% ( 22.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>605.4</td><td>22.6% ( 22.6 % )</td><td>666415</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.2</td><td>18.5% ( 18.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>missouri</td><td>270.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td><td>464498</td><td>14.4% ( 14.4 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>262.3</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>312017</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>california</td><td>209.8</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>174198</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>indiana</td><td>200.6</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>293666</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.2</td><td>10.1% ( 10.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>127.0</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>170371</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2327.6</td><td>87.0% ( 87.0 % )</td><td>2729231</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.1</td><td>84.9% ( 84.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>346.7</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>489961</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2674.3</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3219192</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>11.9</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois. .\nQuestion: what is the estimated pennsylvania population?\nAnswer: 2.2\nQuestion: what is that number times 1000000?\nAnswer: 2200000.0\nQuestion: what is the total number of pennsylvania customers divided by the estimated population?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.30292",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax</td><td>$ -4332 ( 4332 )</td><td>$ -4901 ( 4901 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred gain on the settlement of interest rate swap agreements entered into in connection with the securitization net oftax</td><td>1238</td><td>1636</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax</td><td>-16349 ( 16349 )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr></table> during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations . 9 . fair valuemeasurements the company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in sfas no . 157 , which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value . the standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value . level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date . the company 2019s level 1 assets consist of available-for-sale securities traded on active markets as well as certain brazilian treasury securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets . level 2 observable inputs other than level 1 prices , such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities ; quoted prices in markets that are not active ; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2008, what was the aggregate net unrealized loss, including the net of a tax provision?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "26.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax</td><td>$ -4332 ( 4332 )</td><td>$ -4901 ( 4901 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred gain on the settlement of interest rate swap agreements entered into in connection with the securitization net oftax</td><td>1238</td><td>1636</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax</td><td>-16349 ( 16349 )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr></table> during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations . 9 . fair valuemeasurements the company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in sfas no . 157 , which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value . the standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value . level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date . the company 2019s level 1 assets consist of available-for-sale securities traded on active markets as well as certain brazilian treasury securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets . level 2 observable inputs other than level 1 prices , such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities ; quoted prices in markets that are not active ; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2008, what was the aggregate net unrealized loss, including the net of a tax provision?\nAnswer: 26.0\nQuestion: and from 2007 to that year, what was the change in the unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-15863.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in \"miscellaneous - net\" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .\nQuestion: what value of gwh was generated in 2004?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "32524.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in \"miscellaneous - net\" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .\nQuestion: what value of gwh was generated in 2004?\nAnswer: 32524.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "32379.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in \"miscellaneous - net\" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .\nQuestion: what value of gwh was generated in 2004?\nAnswer: 32524.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\nAnswer: 32379.0\nQuestion: what is net change in generated gwh?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "145.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in \"miscellaneous - net\" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .\nQuestion: what value of gwh was generated in 2004?\nAnswer: 32524.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\nAnswer: 32379.0\nQuestion: what is net change in generated gwh?\nAnswer: 145.0\nQuestion: what value of gwh was generated in 2003?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "32379.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in \"miscellaneous - net\" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see \"critical accounting estimates - sfas 143\" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .\nQuestion: what value of gwh was generated in 2004?\nAnswer: 32524.0\nQuestion: what about in 2003?\nAnswer: 32379.0\nQuestion: what is net change in generated gwh?\nAnswer: 145.0\nQuestion: what value of gwh was generated in 2003?\nAnswer: 32379.0\nQuestion: what growth rate does this represent?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.00448",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved properties</td><td>$ 53624809</td><td>$ 48845672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unproved properties</td><td>3705207</td><td>3710069</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>57330016</td><td>52555741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>-31674085 ( 31674085 )</td><td>-29191247 ( 29191247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net capitalized costs</td><td>$ 25655931</td><td>$ 23364494</td></tr></table> costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .\nQuestion: how much did the net capitalized costs in 2018 represent in relation to the ones in 2017?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1.09807",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved properties</td><td>$ 53624809</td><td>$ 48845672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unproved properties</td><td>3705207</td><td>3710069</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>57330016</td><td>52555741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>-31674085 ( 31674085 )</td><td>-29191247 ( 29191247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net capitalized costs</td><td>$ 25655931</td><td>$ 23364494</td></tr></table> costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .\nQuestion: how much did the net capitalized costs in 2018 represent in relation to the ones in 2017?\nAnswer: 1.09807\nQuestion: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2017 costs?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.09807",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved properties</td><td>$ 53624809</td><td>$ 48845672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>unproved properties</td><td>3705207</td><td>3710069</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>57330016</td><td>52555741</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>-31674085 ( 31674085 )</td><td>-29191247 ( 29191247 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net capitalized costs</td><td>$ 25655931</td><td>$ 23364494</td></tr></table> costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .\nQuestion: how much did the net capitalized costs in 2018 represent in relation to the ones in 2017?\nAnswer: 1.09807\nQuestion: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2017 costs?\nAnswer: 0.09807\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the change in the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "2482838.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants . the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years ; however , tv azteca has the right to purchase , at fair market value , the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement . should tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights ( in whole or in part ) , it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election . the company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $ 1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally . the company has accounted for the annual payment of $ 1.5 million as a capital lease ( initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $ 18.6 million ) . the capital lease asset and the discount on the note , which aggregate approximately $ 30.2 million , represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement . on a quarterly basis , the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required . a former executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $ 4.3 million and $ 11.0 million , respectively . 8 . derivative financial instruments the company enters into interest rate protection agreements to manage exposure on the variable rate debt under its credit facilities and to manage variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments . under these agreements , the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure was limited to the current value of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes its contracts as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 are with credit worthy institutions . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s derivative financial instruments , along with the estimated fair values of the related assets reflected in notes receivable and other long-term assets and ( liabilities ) reflected in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet , are as follows ( in thousands except percentages ) : as of december 31 , 2007 notional amount interest rate term carrying amount and fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31 2007</td><td>notional amount</td><td>interest rate</td><td>term</td><td>carrying amount and fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate swap agreement</td><td>$ 150000</td><td>3.95% ( 3.95 % )</td><td>expiring in 2009</td><td>$ -369 ( 369 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate swap agreement</td><td>100000</td><td>4.08% ( 4.08 % )</td><td>expiring in 2010</td><td>-571 ( 571 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 250000</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>$ -940 ( 940 )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the balance of other long-term notes receivable during 2007?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "6.7",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants . the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years ; however , tv azteca has the right to purchase , at fair market value , the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement . should tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights ( in whole or in part ) , it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election . the company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $ 1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally . the company has accounted for the annual payment of $ 1.5 million as a capital lease ( initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $ 18.6 million ) . the capital lease asset and the discount on the note , which aggregate approximately $ 30.2 million , represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement . on a quarterly basis , the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required . a former executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $ 4.3 million and $ 11.0 million , respectively . 8 . derivative financial instruments the company enters into interest rate protection agreements to manage exposure on the variable rate debt under its credit facilities and to manage variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments . under these agreements , the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure was limited to the current value of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes its contracts as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 are with credit worthy institutions . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s derivative financial instruments , along with the estimated fair values of the related assets reflected in notes receivable and other long-term assets and ( liabilities ) reflected in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet , are as follows ( in thousands except percentages ) : as of december 31 , 2007 notional amount interest rate term carrying amount and fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31 2007</td><td>notional amount</td><td>interest rate</td><td>term</td><td>carrying amount and fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate swap agreement</td><td>$ 150000</td><td>3.95% ( 3.95 % )</td><td>expiring in 2009</td><td>$ -369 ( 369 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate swap agreement</td><td>100000</td><td>4.08% ( 4.08 % )</td><td>expiring in 2010</td><td>-571 ( 571 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 250000</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>$ -940 ( 940 )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the balance of other long-term notes receivable during 2007?\nAnswer: 6.7\nQuestion: what is the effect in cash flow from this change?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "-6.7",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 479</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>19</td><td>17</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 486</td><td>$ 492</td><td>$ 463</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of advertising costs in 2014 and 2015?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "621.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 479</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>19</td><td>17</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 486</td><td>$ 492</td><td>$ 463</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of advertising costs in 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 621.0\nQuestion: what is the sum including advertising costs in 2013?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "856.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: 38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 479</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>19</td><td>17</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 486</td><td>$ 492</td><td>$ 463</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of advertising costs in 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 621.0\nQuestion: what is the sum including advertising costs in 2013?\nAnswer: 856.0\nQuestion: what is the average cost per year?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "285.33333",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>31.8</td><td>39.3</td><td>42.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 171.79</td><td>$ 157.11</td><td>$ 110.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 5469</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 4637</td></tr></table> total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .\nQuestion: what is the total cost of common share repurchases in 2014?\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "5469.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.