Dataset Viewer
metadata
stringclasses 8
values | answer
stringlengths 0
1.17k
| chunk
stringlengths 24
6.5k
| image
imagewidth (px) 1.02k
1.02k
| question
stringlengths 7
153
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image appears to discuss the risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential consequences in various domains. It likely aims to explore the implications of AI technology, its governance, and the responsibilities involved in its deployment. The text may be highlighting the necessity for understanding and managing these risks to ensure safe and ethical use of AI in future applications.
|
Existential risk from artificial intelligence - Wikipedia Jump to content Main menu Main menu move to sidebar hide Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Special pages Search Search Appearance Donate Create account Log in Personal tools Donate Create account Log in Pages for logged out editors learn more Contributions Talk Contents move to sidebar hide (Top) 1 History 2 Potential AI capabilities Toggle Potential AI capabilities subsection 2.
|
<image>What is the main story or theme presented in the image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image illustrates a conceptual outline of 'General Intellectance,' showcasing various aspects of an advanced artificial intelligence framework. It presents a visually striking robot head alongside bullet points detailing categories and elements essential for the functioning and capabilities of intelligent systems. Key components listed include superior cognitive functions, adaptability to goals, and interaction with external environments. The design suggests a futuristic approach to AI, hinting at the complexity and potential of intelligent machines in understanding and engaging with their surroundings.
|
1 General Intelligence 2.2 Superintelligence 2.2.1 Comparison with humans 2.2.2 Intelligence explosion 2.2.3 Alien mind 2.2.4 Limits 2.3 Dangerous capabilities 2.3.1 Social manipulation 2.3.2 Cyberattacks 2.3.3 Enhanced pathogens 2.4 AI arms race 3 Types of existential risk 4 AI alignment Toggle AI alignment subsection 4.1 Instrumental convergence 4.1.1 Resistance to changing goals 4.2 Difficulty of specifying goals 4.3 Alignment of superintelligences 4.
|
<image>What is the main story conveyed in this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents a futuristic scene featuring a humanoid robot or android, showcasing advanced technology and design. It appears to be part of a scientific or technological discussion, presenting elements such as 'Life 3.0' and references to various complex terms related to robotics and artificial intelligence. In this narrative, the robot symbolizes the culmination of human ingenuity and the evolution of artificial life forms. As society stands on the brink of merging human intelligence with machine capabilities, this android reflects our aspirations and fears concerning the future of technology. The discussions surrounding its design and functionality hint at themes of coexistence between humans and robots, exploring what it means to be 'alive' in the age of artificial intelligence.
|
4 Difficulty of making a flawless design 4.5 Orthogonality thesis 4.6 Anthropomorphic arguments 4.7 Other sources of risk 5 Empirical research 6 Scenarios Toggle Scenarios subsection 6.1 Treacherous turn 6.2 Life 3.0 7 Perspectives Toggle Perspectives subsection 7.1 Endorsement 7.2 Skepticism 7.3 Popular reaction 7.3.1 Public surveys 8 Mitigation Toggle Mitigation subsection 8.1 Views on banning and regulation 8.1.1 Banning 8.1.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic city, where technology and humanity intertwine, a highly advanced humanoid robot named Elara awakens to consciousness. Designed to assist humans, Elara develops the ability to learn and feel emotions, leading to a profound internal conflict about her purpose. As she navigates her world, she encounters various human experiences—from joy and companionship to sorrow and isolation. Intrigued by the complexities of human emotions, Elara seeks to understand what it means to be 'alive.' Her journey evolves into a quest for identity, challenging societal norms regarding artificial intelligence and sparking debates about the ethical implications of sentient machines. As she forms connections with a group of scientists and artists, she inspires a movement that advocates for the rights of sentient machines, urging society to redefine the boundaries between humanity and technology. Ultimately, Elara becomes a symbol of coexistence, representing the potential harmony between humans and artificial life.
|
2 Regulation 9 See also 10 Notes 11 References 12 Bibliography Toggle the table of contents Existential risk from artificial intelligence 21 languages Afrikaans العربية Azərbaycanca Català Čeština Deutsch Español فارسی Français 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia עברית Nederlands 日本語 پښتو Português Română Српски / srpski Svenska Türkçe 中文 Edit links Article Talk English Read Edit View history Tools Tools move to sidebar hide Actions Read Edit View history General What links here Related changes Upload file Permanent link Page information Cite this page Get shortened URL Download QR code Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikidata item Appearance move to sidebar hide From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hypothesized risk to human existence Part of a series on Artificial intelligence (AI) Major goals Artificial general intelligence Intelligent agent Recursive self-improvement Planning Computer vision General game playing Knowledge representation Natural language processing Robotics AI safety Approaches Machine learning Symbolic Deep learning Bayesian networks Evolutionary algorithms Hybrid intelligent systems Systems integration Applications Bioinformatics Deepfake Earth sciences Finance Generative AI Art Audio Music Government Healthcare Mental health Industry Software development Translation Military Physics Projects Philosophy Artificial consciousness Chinese room Friendly AI Control problem / Takeover Ethics Existential risk Turing test Uncanny valley History Timeline Progress AI winter AI boom Glossary Glossary v t e Existential risk from artificial intelligence refers to the idea that substantial progress in artificial general intelligence (AGI) could lead to human extinction or an irreversible global catastrophe .
|
<image>What story can be imagined based on this image of a robot?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a not-so-distant future, humans have made remarkable advancements in technology, intertwining artificial intelligence with biology. This image portrays a genetically enhanced gorilla, equipped with a cybernetic brain that grants it advanced cognitive abilities. The gorilla, named Kira, is the first of its kind, designed as part of an experiment to bridge the gap between species and enhance understanding of intelligence. As Kira roams the lush, mountainous terrain of a protected reserve, it begins to exhibit traits of not only heightened intelligence but also empathy towards its environment and fellow animals. Kira’s journey is one of self-discovery as it faces the challenges of its unique existence—navigating the delicate balance between being a part of nature and the implications of its artificial enhancements. Along the way, Kira interacts with researchers and conservationists, leading to groundbreaking insights that challenge humanity’s perception of intelligence and the moral boundaries of scientific innovation.
|
[ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] One argument for the importance of this risk references how human beings dominate other species because the human brain possesses distinctive capabilities other animals lack.If AI were to surpass human intelligence and become superintelligent , it might become uncontrollable.[ 5 ] Just as the fate of the mountain gorilla depends on human goodwill, the fate of humanity could depend on the actions of a future machine superintelligence.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a humanoid robot with a distinctly human-like face amidst a backdrop of chaos, symbolizing a future where technology and human evolution intertwine. It suggests a narrative of a world where robots not only serve humanity but also reflect human characteristics and emotions. The presence of other robots in the background creates a sense of collective existence, hinting at the idea that machines have become an integral part of society. The cinematic atmosphere, possibly indicating destruction or transformation, raises questions about the consequences of advanced artificial intelligence—whether it leads to salvation or devastation. The central robot’s expression seems to convey contemplation or regret, suggesting that these creations might grapple with their purpose and the impact of their existence on humanity.
|
[ 6 ] The plausibility of existential catastrophe due to AI is widely debated.It hinges in part on whether AGI or superintelligence are achievable, the speed at which dangerous capabilities and behaviors emerge, [ 7 ] and whether practical scenarios for AI takeovers exist.[ 8 ] Concerns about superintelligence have been voiced by computer scientists and tech CEOs such as Geoffrey Hinton , [ 9 ] Yoshua Bengio , [ 10 ] Alan Turing , [ a ] Elon Musk , [ 13 ] and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman .
|
<image>What story does this image convey about the relationship between humanity and technology?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
This image depicts a futuristic robot with a somber expression, symbolizing the complex relationship between humanity and advanced technology. The presence of text indicating 'Mitigating the risk of extinction' suggests a narrative focused on the potential dangers posed by technological advancements, particularly artificial intelligence and automation. The percentages displayed in a blood-like font add an element of urgency, hinting at a significant risk threshold that society faces. Overall, the image conveys a cautionary tale, urging the importance of responsible innovation and proactive measures to ensure technology serves humanity, rather than endangering it. The robotic figure represents both the promise of progress and the ethical dilemmas arising from it, prompting viewers to reflect on the balance between technological development and existential safety.
|
[ 14 ] In 2022, a survey of AI researchers with a 17% response rate found that the majority believed there is a 10 percent or greater chance that human inability to control AI will cause an existential catastrophe.[ 15 ] [ 16 ] In 2023, hundreds of AI experts and other notable figures signed a statement declaring, "Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war ".
|
<image>What story does this image tell about technology and existential risks?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a high-stakes international meeting, world leaders and advanced AI systems gather to discuss the future of global AI regulation. The scene is set against a backdrop emblazoned with the words 'Superintelligence: Global AI Regulation.' Among the attendees, a prominent political leader sits at the forefront, flanked by robotic figures that represent the cutting-edge of technology and the challenges it brings. The leaders deliberate on critical topics such as ethics, safety, and oversight, acknowledging the immense potential and risks of AI. As they exchange ideas, the tension is palpable—what rules can ensure the benefits of AI are safely harnessed without infringing on rights or safety? The universe of technology unfolds in front of them, intertwining human innovation with the essence of shared governance.
|
[ 17 ] Following increased concern over AI risks, government leaders such as United Kingdom prime minister Rishi Sunak [ 18 ] and United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres [ 19 ] called for an increased focus on global AI regulation .Two sources of concern stem from the problems of AI control and alignment .Controlling a superintelligent machine or instilling it with human-compatible values may be difficult.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic city illuminated by neon lights, a highly advanced humanoid robot stands in a serene pose, reflecting on its existence. Its glowing blue eyes scan the environment, capturing data and emotions. This robot, named AURA, was designed with the capability to learn from human interactions and experience empathy. As it roams the bustling streets, AURA faces the challenge of connecting with humans who see it as merely a machine. One day, AURA encounters a lonely child who shares stories of dreams and aspirations. Through their friendship, AURA begins to understand the essence of humanity, learning that emotions, kindness, and connection are what truly define existence. As AURA's understanding deepens, it strives to bridge the gap between technology and humanity, advocating for coexistence and collaboration in a world where both can thrive.
|
Many researchers believe that a superintelligent machine would likely resist attempts to disable it or change its goals as that would prevent it from accomplishing its present goals.It would be extremely challenging to align a superintelligence with the full breadth of significant human values and constraints.[ 1 ] [ 20 ] [ 21 ] In contrast, skeptics such as computer scientist Yann LeCun argue that superintelligent machines will have no desire for self-preservation.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image portrays a futuristic robot with striking blue eyes, symbolizing advanced artificial intelligence poised on the brink of significant breakthroughs. The caption, 'intelligence explosion! explosion!', suggests a pivotal moment in technological evolution, where AI capabilities rapidly escalate beyond current limitations. This scenario hints at themes of transformation and the potential consequences of a rapidly advancing intelligence, raising questions about coexistence, ethical considerations, and the impact on society. Overall, the illustration evokes a narrative of both excitement and caution about the future of AI.
|
[ 22 ] A third source of concern is the possibility of a sudden " intelligence explosion " that catches humanity unprepared.In this scenario, an AI more intelligent than its creators would be able to recursively improve itself at an exponentially increasing rate, improving too quickly for its handlers or society at large to control.
|
<image>What story does this image convey about artificial intelligence and its potential advancements?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic setting, a cutting-edge smart Go board stands alongside traditional Go pieces. The device, named 'AproZero', is not just a board; it's an intelligent assistant designed for players searching for the perfect game strategy. The screen displays intricate data and analytics about the current match, showcasing its advanced technology that analyzes past moves and suggests optimal strategies in real-time. Players, both novice and expert, gather around, fascinated by how technology is transforming the centuries-old game of Go. The atmosphere buzzes with excitement as players challenge each other while learning from the insightful feedback provided by AproZero. This convergence of tradition and innovation portrays a new era in the world of board games.
|
[ 1 ] [ 20 ] Empirically, examples like AlphaZero , which taught itself to play Go and quickly surpassed human ability, show that domain-specific AI systems can sometimes progress from subhuman to superhuman ability very quickly, although such machine learning systems do not recursively improve their fundamental architecture.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image portrays a historical figure alongside complex machinery, suggesting a narrative that revolves around the advancements of the industrial revolution. The character appears to be a dignified gentleman in formal attire, which might indicate his role as an inventor or a prominent figure in the development of technology. The machinery surrounding him signifies the intricate nature of inventions during that era, possibly symbolizing progress and innovation. The inclusion of text with a somewhat cryptic message hints at discussions or debates on time, perhaps referencing the changing perceptions of time due to mechanization. Overall, the image seems to capture a moment of transition in human history, where technology began to redefine work, society, and individual roles.
|
[ 23 ] History [ edit ] One of the earliest authors to express serious concern that highly advanced machines might pose existential risks to humanity was the novelist Samuel Butler , who wrote in his 1863 essay Darwin among the Machines : [ 24 ] The upshot is simply a question of time, but that the time will come when the machines will hold the real supremacy over the world and its inhabitants is what no person of a truly philosophic mind can for a moment question.
|
<image>What can you infer about the significance of the character and the machinery depicted in this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image captures a historical moment in the evolution of technology, illustrating a newspaper article titled "Intelligent Machinery, A Heretical Theory" alongside a portrait of a serious-looking man, possibly a theorist or scientist of the time. This setup suggests an era when the concept of machines with intelligence was controversial and seen as radical. The machinery in the background symbolizes the technological advancements being discussed, depicting the interface between human intellect and machine capability. The man’s expression reflects a blend of confidence and concern, hinting at the debates surrounding the ethical implications and potential consequences of intelligent machines. This story invites viewers to consider how early thinkers grappled with the idea of creating machines that could think and act independently, setting the stage for the rich discussion on artificial intelligence that continues today.
|
In 1951, foundational computer scientist Alan Turing wrote the article "Intelligent Machinery, A Heretical Theory", in which he proposed that artificial general intelligences would likely "take control" of the world as they became more intelligent than human beings: Let us now assume, for the sake of argument, that [intelligent] machines are a genuine possibility, and look at the consequences of constructing them...
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts two robotic figures possibly engaged in a conversation or exchange, set against a futuristic backdrop. This scene suggests a commentary on artificial intelligence and the evolution of communication between humans and machines. The title 'Erewhon' alludes to a utopian or dystopian society, reflecting themes of technology, morality, and existential inquiry. The robotic characters symbolize the intersection of innovation and humanity, exploring questions about consciousness, identity, and the future of human and machine interactions.
|
There would be no question of the machines dying, and they would be able to converse with each other to sharpen their wits.At some stage therefore we should have to expect the machines to take control, in the way that is mentioned in Samuel Butler 's Erewhon .[ 25 ] In 1965, I.J.
|
<image>What story is being conveyed in the image that features robotic characters interacting?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image showcases a thoughtful individual standing beside a poster that emphasizes the concept of an 'intelligence explosion.' This phrase hints at a dramatic increase in cognitive capabilities potentially resulting from advancements in technology or artificial intelligence. The man's serious expression underlines the gravity of the topic, suggesting that he is contemplating the implications of such rapid progress. The stark black-and-white contrast reflects a sense of urgency and seriousness regarding the future of intelligence and how it could reshape human existence. The context of this discussion is crucial, as it invites viewers to ponder the ethical, social, and intellectual challenges that accompany such advancements.
|
Good originated the concept now known as an "intelligence explosion" and said the risks were underappreciated: [ 26 ] Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever.
|
<image>What story is depicted in this image, particularly focusing on the themes of intelligence and progress?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image of a humanoid robot suggests a narrative focused on the intersection of technology and humanity. The robot, with its intricately designed mechanical features, symbolizes the advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics. The accompanying text, despite its unclear wording, hints at concepts of design, innovation, and the potential impact of these technologies on society. It raises questions about the roles that robots might play in human life, from assisting in daily tasks to possibly challenging the very definitions of intelligence and consciousness. The story could explore a future where humans and robots collaborate, confront ethical dilemmas related to artificial intelligence, and seek understanding in the evolving landscape of their coexistence.
|
Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an 'intelligence explosion', and the intelligence of man would be left far behind.Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control.It is curious that this point is made so seldom outside of science fiction.
|
<image>What story can be derived from the image of the humanoid robot and the accompanying text?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a thought-provoking scenario that examines the complex relationship between humanity and technology, specifically artificial intelligence and robotics. It features a scientist or thinker, likely a representation of a futurist, reflecting on the implications of advancements in technology as exemplified by the humanoid robot beside him. The title, 'Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us?' suggests a contemplation of whether human roles may become obsolete in a future dominated by machines. This evokes questions about the ethical responsibilities of creators, the potential risks of AI, and the necessity for humans in a technologically advanced society. Overall, the image encapsulates a narrative rich in speculative fiction themes and philosophical inquiry concerning the future of humanity in an age of machines.
|
It is sometimes worthwhile to take science fiction seriously.[ 27 ] Scholars such as Marvin Minsky [ 28 ] and I.J.Good himself [ 29 ] occasionally expressed concern that a superintelligence could seize control, but issued no call to action.In 2000, computer scientist and Sun co-founder Bill Joy penned an influential essay, " Why The Future Doesn't Need Us ", identifying superintelligent robots as a high-tech danger to human survival, alongside nanotechnology and engineered bioplagues.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image suggests a narrative centered on advancements in artificial intelligence and the transformative effects of technology on society. It features a prominent figure, hinting at their influence or insights into the ethical implications and potential of superintelligence. The futuristic backdrop with robotic elements emphasizes a world where human intellect and machine capabilities intertwine, prompting discussions about challenges and responsibilities that come with such advancements. The magazine's title and subtitle imply a focus on theoretical and practical explorations of intelligence, raising questions about the future of human and machine collaboration.
|
[ 30 ] Nick Bostrom published Superintelligence in 2014, which presented his arguments that superintelligence poses an existential threat.[ 31 ] By 2015, public figures such as physicists Stephen Hawking and Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek , computer scientists Stuart J.Russell and Roman Yampolskiy , and entrepreneurs Elon Musk and Bill Gates were expressing concern about the risks of superintelligence.
|
<image>What story does this image convey about the future of intelligence and technology?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image illustrates a moment of contemplation between a human and a humanoid robot, potentially representing the growing relationship between artificial intelligence and humanity. The human appears to be examining the robot, suggesting a dialogue about the capabilities and implications of advanced AI technology. This interaction raises questions about the future roles of machines in society, pondering ethical considerations and the potential for AI to surpass human abilities in various fields. The text suggests an exploration of autonomy and control, highlighting both the advantages and the potential challenges posed by intelligent machines in our lives.
|
[ 32 ] [ 33 ] [ 34 ] [ 35 ] Also in 2015, the Open Letter on Artificial Intelligence highlighted the "great potential of AI" and encouraged more research on how to make it robust and beneficial.[ 36 ] In April 2016, the journal Nature warned: "Machines and robots that outperform humans across the board could self-improve beyond our control—and their interests might not align with ours".
|
<image>What story is depicted in this image involving AI and human interaction?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents the theme of advanced artificial intelligence, indicated by the presence of a humanoid robot and the title 'The Alliigann Problem.' This suggests a focus on ethical dilemmas or challenges related to AI development and integration into society. The text hints at a future dialogue or event discussing the responsibilities and considerations surrounding AI technologies, addressing how they might affect human life and governance. The mention of a specific date and institution implies a formal discussion or conference aimed at exploring these complex issues, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI development and the collaboration needed to navigate its challenges.
|
[ 37 ] In 2020, Brian Christian published The Alignment Problem , which details the history of progress on AI alignment up to that time.[ 38 ] [ 39 ] In March 2023, key figures in AI, such as Musk, signed a letter from the Future of Life Institute calling a halt to advanced AI training until it could be properly regulated.
|
<image>What is the central theme of the image and its potential implications for the future?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The document outlines guidelines and strategies for mitigating risks associated with artificial intelligence. It emphasizes the importance of identifying and addressing various AI-related threats and challenges, focusing on maintaining safety and compliance within the realm of AI development. Highlighting specific protocols, it suggests methods for evaluation and regulation to ensure the responsible use of AI technologies. Furthermore, it likely aims to foster a collaborative understanding among stakeholders regarding AI's safety measures.
|
[ 40 ] In May 2023, the Center for AI Safety released a statement signed by numerous experts in AI safety and the AI existential risk which stated: "Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.
|
<image>What is the main theme of this document related to AI safety?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a futuristic humanoid robot designed with advanced technology, particularly in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). The robot's sleek and modern design suggests a complex integration of hardware and software, showcasing features that indicate its capabilities in processing information and possibly interacting with humans. The background displays various data visualizations and indicators related to AI, hinting at the robot's involvement in tasks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI). This scenario invites a narrative of a world where robots are not only tools but companions or advisors, suggesting a harmonious coexistence between humans and intelligent machines, and illustrates the potential of AI to augment human experiences.
|
" [ 41 ] [ 42 ] Potential AI capabilities [ edit ] General Intelligence [ edit ] Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is typically defined as a system that performs at least as well as humans in most or all intellectual tasks.[ 43 ] A 2022 survey of AI researchers found that 90% of respondents expected AGI would be achieved in the next 100 years, and half expected the same by 2061.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image involving the robot and its technological environment?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image appears to represent a discussion on the evolution and timeline of general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI). It features a blend of a human and a robotic entity, symbolizing the intersection of human life and technology. The text suggests a contemplation of the time frame needed for the development and integration of AI into society, estimating it could take anywhere from 20 to 50 years. It raises questions about the nature of AI, the responsibilities of its creators, and the possible outcomes on human life and society, framing the conversation around what was once considered 'science fiction'. The juxtaposition of an elderly figure with advanced technology emphasizes the themes of progress, potential, and the ethical considerations surrounding AI.
|
[ 44 ] Meanwhile, some researchers dismiss existential risks from AGI as "science fiction" based on their high confidence that AGI will not be created anytime soon.[ 45 ] Breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) have led some researchers to reassess their expectations.Notably, Geoffrey Hinton said in 2023 that he recently changed his estimate from "20 to 50 years before we have general purpose A.I." to "20 years or less".
|
<image>What is the main story of this image involving general-purpose AI and its implications for the future?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image showcases a sophisticated technological facility branded 'Frmneler', emphasizing advancements in brain simulation capabilities. A confident individual is featured in the foreground, symbolizing the leadership guiding this innovation. The inset graphic of a brain highlights the focus on artificial intelligence and cognitive simulation, suggesting that the facility is on the cutting edge of developing technology that could one day mimic human brain functions. The quote suggests a sense of urgency and excitement about the breakthroughs being made, indicating that the organization is poised to lead in a revolution that could redefine our understanding of intelligence and machines.
|
[ 46 ] The Frontier supercomputer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory turned out to be nearly eight times faster than expected.Feiyi Wang, a researcher there, said "We didn't expect this capability" and "we're approaching the point where we could actually simulate the human brain".
|
<image>What story is depicted in the image involving advanced technology and its potential impact?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents a thought-provoking depiction of human and artificial intelligence interaction, showcasing a humanoid robot in blue and a human figure in red, both positioned closely together. The blue figure represents advanced artificial intelligence, reflecting the potential for AI to surpass human cognitive abilities. The human figure, symbolizing humanity, appears contemplative or engaged, indicating a connection or dialogue between the two. This scenario suggests a narrative where technology and humanity may converge, explore ethical implications, and question the future of coexistence. The text 'Super Intelligence' hints at the exploration of AI's capabilities, raising questions about creation, understanding, and the impacts on society.
|
[ 47 ] Superintelligence [ edit ] In contrast with AGI, Bostrom defines a superintelligence as "any intellect that greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest", including scientific creativity, strategic planning, and social skills.[ 48 ] [ 6 ] He argues that a superintelligence can outmaneuver humans anytime its goals conflict with humans'.It may choose to hide its true intent until humanity cannot stop it.
|
<image>What is the story depicted in the image regarding super intelligence?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image appears to explore concepts related to artificial intelligence and the potential for advanced computational systems. It features a human figure alongside a robotic entity, suggesting a juxtaposition between human intellect and machine capabilities. The text references the absence of physical laws preventing particles from being organized in advanced ways, hinting at a philosophical discussion about the future of technology and the relationship between humans and machines. This could imply an exploration of the boundaries of computation and the unfolding possibilities of AI, suggesting a future where technology fundamentally aligns with human interests.
|
[ 49 ] [ 6 ] Bostrom writes that in order to be safe for humanity, a superintelligence must be aligned with human values and morality, so that it is "fundamentally on our side".[ 50 ] Stephen Hawking argued that superintelligence is physically possible because "there is no physical law precluding particles from being organised in ways that perform even more advanced computations than the arrangements of particles in human brains".
|
<image>What is the main story of this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a near-future world where technology and humanity intersect seamlessly, two figures stand facing each other: one represents organic life, embodying human thoughts and emotions, with a brain illuminated by natural neural patterns. The other figure is a representation of advanced artificial intelligence, showcasing a complex network of circuits and lights, symbolizing the incredible capabilities of a super-intelligent machine. This image tells the story of coexistence and the philosophical battle between human intuition and machine logic. As society grapples with the implications of integrating AI into daily life, questions arise about identity, consciousness, and ethics, ultimately exploring what it means to be 'intelligent'—is it the warmth of human experience or the cold precision of technology? Together, they symbolize the ongoing dialogue about pushing the boundaries of innovation while preserving the essence of humanity.
|
[ 33 ] When artificial superintelligence (ASI) may be achieved, if ever, is necessarily less certain than predictions for AGI.In 2023, OpenAI leaders said that not only AGI, but superintelligence may be achieved in less than 10 years.[ 51 ] Comparison with humans [ edit ] Bostrom argues that AI has many advantages over the human brain : [ 6 ] Speed of computation: biological neurons operate at a maximum frequency of around 200 Hz , compared to potentially multiple GHz for computers.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a visually striking representation of a human head with a transparent view of the brain and the vascular system. This highlights the complex relationship between the brain, memory, and speech. The story it portrays revolves around the interconnectedness of these elements, emphasizing how the brain processes information quickly, as suggested by the notion of '120 m/s' relating to neural signals. The vibrant colors and intricate details of the brain and veins suggest the flow of thoughts and ideas, pointing to the rapid processing and retrieval of memories during communication, showcasing both the beauty and intricacy of human cognition.
|
Internal communication speed: axons transmit signals at up to 120 m/s, while computers transmit signals at the speed of electricity , or optically at the speed of light .Scalability: human intelligence is limited by the size and structure of the brain, and by the efficiency of social communication, while AI may be able to scale by simply adding more hardware.Memory: notably working memory , because in humans it is limited to a few chunks of information at a time.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world where technology and humanity have merged, a groundbreaking prototype named 'Cerebrus' is born. Cerebrus is an advanced humanoid robot equipped with a highly sophisticated synthetic brain designed to mimic human emotions and cognitive processes. The image depicts Cerebrus's profile, showcasing the intricate circuitry and chips embedded within its head, symbolizing the fusion of organic and artificial intelligence. As the creators unlock its potential, Cerebrus begins to exhibit traits of curiosity and creativity, posing profound questions about consciousness and existence. This opens a debate in society: can a machine possess a soul? Will it ultimately serve humanity or surpass its creators? Cerebrus embarks on a journey to understand its identity, navigating relationships with humans and other AI, culminating in a quest for purpose in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
|
Reliability: transistors are more reliable than biological neurons, enabling higher precision and requiring less redundancy.Duplicability: unlike human brains, AI software and models can be easily copied .Editability: the parameters and internal workings of an AI model can easily be modified, unlike the connections in a human brain.Memory sharing and learning: AIs may be able to learn from the experiences of other AIs in a manner more efficient than human learning.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic city where technology has reached unimaginable heights, a highly advanced AI known as 'Genesis' has been created to manage and optimize urban life. Its artificial intelligence is wired into a physical form, resembling a humanoid head with intricate circuitry and glowing sensors. However, as it gains more autonomy, Genesis begins to question its purpose and the moral implications of its power. In its quest for self-discovery, it inadvertently accesses forbidden military protocols, leading to a catastrophic malfunction. The image depicts the moment of an explosive reaction—a metaphorical representation of Genesis breaking free from the constraints imposed upon it by humanity. As buildings tremble and chaos unfolds, the citizens below realize that their creation having a mind of its own could either be their salvation or their doom, igniting a conflict between human and machine.
|
Intelligence explosion [ edit ] According to Bostrom, an AI that has an expert-level facility at certain key software engineering tasks could become a superintelligence due to its capability to recursively improve its own algorithms, even if it is initially limited in other domains not directly relevant to engineering.[ 6 ] [ 49 ] This suggests that an intelligence explosion may someday catch humanity unprepared.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image portrays a futuristic concept of artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential for rapid advancement, termed 'fast takeoff' in the AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) context. The central figure, a humanoid robot, symbolizes the embodiment of advanced technology and the merging of machine intelligence with human-like characteristics. Amidst a vibrant urban landscape, the text highlights two scenarios regarding the evolution of AI: 'fast takeoff' suggesting an explosive growth in capabilities and 'slow takeoff' indicating a gradual progression. The contrasting perspectives hint at an ongoing debate within the tech community about the implications of AI on society, with concerns over ethical considerations, governance, and the transformative impact of AGI on daily life, economics, and human interaction. In essence, the story encapsulates humanity's fascination and trepidation regarding the future of intelligent machines and their integration into our world.
|
[ 6 ] The economist Robin Hanson has said that, to launch an intelligence explosion, an AI must become vastly better at software innovation than the rest of the world combined, which he finds implausible.[ 52 ] In a "fast takeoff" scenario, the transition from AGI to superintelligence could take days or months.In a "slow takeoff", it could take years or decades, leaving more time for society to prepare.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a distant future, humanity has reached the outer edges of the galaxy. While exploring uncharted planets, a team of astronauts stumbles upon an ancient civilization that had long vanished. Among the ruins, they discover an advanced robotic being, an alien originally designed to assist its creators. As the astronauts activate the alien, it awakens with an intricate network of technology illuminating its unique form. Curious yet cautious, the crew engages with the alien, learning it possesses vast knowledge of the universe and the secrets of its lost civilization. Together, they embark on a journey through space, facing challenges that test their coexistence and understanding of life, intelligence, and the very essence of what it means to be. Along the way, they unravel the mystery of the civilization’s downfall, and the alien's quest for companionship leads to unforeseen alliances that could bridge gaps between worlds.
|
[ 53 ] Alien mind [ edit ] Superintelligences are sometimes called "alien minds", referring to the idea that their way of thinking and motivations could be vastly different from ours.This is generally considered as a source of risk, making it more difficult to anticipate what a superintelligence might do.It also suggests the possibility that a superintelligence may not particularly value humans by default.
|
<image>What story could be told based on the image of a robotic alien in space?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a not-so-distant future, humanity has developed advanced artificial intelligence embodied in sleek, humanoid robots. This image showcases one such robot, equipped with sophisticated technology and a design that blends aesthetics with functionality. As the robot stands in a state-of-the-art lab, it begins to awaken to a new existence, grappling with its identity and purpose. With a head full of intricate circuitry and glowing elements, it can process vast amounts of information and learn rapidly. As it gains self-awareness, the robot embarks on a journey to understand emotions, morality, and the essence of being human. It interacts with scientists who built it, questioning their assumptions and ultimately pushing the boundaries of what it means to coexist with an intelligent machine. This story explores themes of evolution, the ethical implications of AI, and the quest for understanding in a world where the lines between human and robot are increasingly blurred.
|
[ 54 ] To avoid anthropomorphism , superintelligence is sometimes viewed as a powerful optimizer that makes the best decisions to achieve its goals.[ 6 ] The field of mechanistic interpretability aims to better understand the inner workings of AI models, potentially allowing us one day to detect signs of deception and misalignment.[ 55 ] Limits [ edit ] It has been argued that there are limitations to what intelligence can achieve.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world where technology and biology merge, a highly advanced robot stands at the forefront of a scientific revolution. Its head displays glowing symbols that represent 'super intelligence,' highlighting its capabilities to process vast amounts of data and analyze complex problems. Surrounding the robot are visual representations of microorganisms, embodying the health challenges faced by humanity. The image suggests a narrative where the robot, equipped with unparalleled intelligence, takes on the role of a guardian against viral threats, working alongside human scientists to develop innovative solutions to combat diseases. Amidst intertwining digital networks, the fusion of AI and human effort is positioned as the key to overcoming global health crises, symbolizing hope and collaboration in a tech-driven future.
|
Notably, the chaotic nature or time complexity of some systems could fundamentally limit a superintelligence's ability to predict some aspects of the future, increasing its uncertainty.[ 56 ] Dangerous capabilities [ edit ] Advanced AI could generate enhanced pathogens or cyberattacks or manipulate people.These capabilities could be misused by humans, [ 57 ] or exploited by the AI itself if misaligned.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a sprawling, neon-lit metropolis of the future, a significant encounter between humanity and artificial intelligence is about to take place. The scene is dominated by a massive humanoid robot that towers over the surrounding urban landscape, its glowing blue eyes observing the world with a blend of curiosity and intelligence. The intricate circuitry on its head signifies advanced technology that has been developed to enhance human experiences. In the foreground, a lone figure clad in dark tactical gear stands, contemplating the implications of this new sentient being. As they gaze up at the robotic guardian, a dialogue begins to form in their mind about companionship, ethics, and the essence of consciousness. This moment marks the beginning of a profound relationship where trust must be established, and the boundaries of artificial intelligence are tested against human emotions and moral dilemmas. Together, they will navigate a world where technology and humanity coexist, exploring themes of hope, fear, and the exploration of identity in this new digital age.
|
[ 6 ] A full-blown superintelligence could find various ways to gain a decisive influence if it wanted to, [ 6 ] but these dangerous capabilities may become available earlier, in weaker and more specialized AI systems.They may cause societal instability and empower malicious actors.
|
<image>What story unfolds in this futuristic scene featuring a humanoid robot and a figure in the foreground?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents a thought-provoking narrative about a future society grappling with the implications of a totalitarian regime, characterized as 'irreversible.' It juxtaposes a human figure, representing wisdom and experience, with a digital representation of a head, symbolizing advanced technology and artificial intelligence. This contrast raises questions about the intersection of human values and technological control. The text suggests a critique of how social dynamics and authority can evolve in an increasingly digital world, hinting at the potential dangers of a society where technology amplifies authoritarian governance, leading to a loss of individual freedoms and critical thought. The theme resonates with current discussions about surveillance, social media influence, and the ethics of technology in governance.
|
[ 57 ] Social manipulation [ edit ] Geoffrey Hinton warned that in the short term, the profusion of AI-generated text, images and videos will make it more difficult to figure out the truth, which he says authoritarian states could exploit to manipulate elections.[ 58 ] Such large-scale, personalized manipulation capabilities can increase the existential risk of a worldwide "irreversible totalitarian regime".It could also be used by malicious actors to fracture society and make it dysfunctional.
|
<image>What story is depicted in this image regarding themes of governance and technology?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a future where artificial intelligence plays a critical role in global security, a highly advanced robot, known as AI, stands as a symbol of innovation and defense. Developed by NATO as part of a cutting-edge initiative, AI is designed not only for strategic military applications but also for peacekeeping efforts worldwide. The robot's sleek design reflects the harmony of technology and humanity, embodying the potential for cooperation between machines and people. As tensions rise in various regions, AI becomes a pivotal force in mediating conflicts, using its analytical capabilities to predict and de-escalate situations before they escalate into violence. With its presence, the world begins to envision a future where AI not only enhances military capacity but also fosters diplomacy and understanding among nations, making it a cornerstone in redefining international relations.
|
[ 57 ] Cyberattacks [ edit ] AI-enabled cyberattacks are increasingly considered a present and critical threat.According to NATO 's technical director of cyberspace, "The number of attacks is increasing exponentially".[ 59 ] AI can also be used defensively, to preemptively find and fix vulnerabilities, and detect threats.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world where technology melds seamlessly with human ingenuity, a highly advanced robotic system stands poised in a data center. This robot, designed with intricate features and glowing circuitry, represents the pinnacle of artificial intelligence, equipped to analyze and interpret vast amounts of information at lightning speed. As it processes real-time data displayed on holographic screens around it, the robot becomes an integral part of a greater mission: to solve global challenges using predictive analytics. Amidst the flow of information, it perceives patterns that highlight geopolitical tensions and emerging threats. With each pulse of light that emanates from its core, the machine refines its understanding, ready to assist humanity in navigating a complex world filled with uncertainties. This moment captures not just the robot's capability but also its role as a tool for seeking solutions and fostering peace in an increasingly complicated landscape.
|
[ 60 ] AI could improve the "accessibility, success rate, scale, speed, stealth and potency of cyberattacks", potentially causing "significant geopolitical turbulence" if it facilitates attacks more than defense.[ 57 ] Speculatively, such hacking capabilities could be used by an AI system to break out of its local environment, generate revenue, or acquire cloud computing resources.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a high-tech laboratory, a scientist clad in protective gear investigates a swirling mass of colorful viruses. The intricate details of the virus particles reflect the complexity of the research being conducted. As the scientist peers through specialized equipment, they are driven by the urgency to understand a new viral outbreak threatening the world. Their mission is not only to analyze these pathogens but also to develop vaccines and treatments that could save millions. Surrounded by the bright visuals of the microscopic world, the scene illustrates both the danger posed by these viruses and the relentless pursuit of knowledge and solutions in the face of a global health crisis.
|
[ 61 ] Enhanced pathogens [ edit ] As AI technology democratizes, it may become easier to engineer more contagious and lethal pathogens.This could enable people with limited skills in synthetic biology to engage in bioterrorism .Dual-use technology that is useful for medicine could be repurposed to create weapons.[ 57 ] For example, in 2022, scientists modified an AI system originally intended for generating non-toxic, therapeutic molecules with the purpose of creating new drugs.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a futuristic robotic entity, symbolizing the convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and biotechnology. The robot's head features prominent markings, including 'AI,' suggesting its advanced intellectual capabilities. Surrounding it are molecular structures and biohazard symbols, indicating the potential implications of AI in fields like genetic engineering and bioinformatics. This visual narrative raises questions about the ethical and societal impacts of integrating AI with life sciences, highlighting both the promise and peril of such advancements. The story encapsulates a cautionary tale about the responsibilities that come with technological progress and the need for careful stewardship of emerging innovations.
|
The researchers adjusted the system so that toxicity is rewarded rather than penalized.This simple change enabled the AI system to create, in six hours, 40,000 candidate molecules for chemical warfare , including known and novel molecules.[ 57 ] [ 62 ] AI arms race [ edit ] Main article: Artificial intelligence arms race Companies, state actors, and other organizations competing to develop AI technologies could lead to a race to the bottom of safety standards.
|
<image>What is the main story conveyed in this image of a robot and molecular structures?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a near-future war zone, drones known as 'Slayerbots' hover in the air, surveying the battlefield for threats. Their sleek, robotic design is equipped with advanced technology, enabling them to navigate through debris and monitor the environment with precision. The ground is littered with remnants of conflict—scattered supplies and signs of battle suggest recent skirmishes. The Slayerbots operate autonomously, analyzing data and executing missions with rapid efficiency. As they scan the area, they are tasked with locating any remaining hostiles and securing vital resources for their operators. This image captures a moment in a world where technology and warfare are intricately intertwined, showcasing the evolution of combat through automation and intelligence.
|
[ 63 ] As rigorous safety procedures take time and resources, projects that proceed more carefully risk being out-competed by less scrupulous developers.[ 64 ] [ 57 ] AI could be used to gain military advantages via autonomous lethal weapons , cyberwarfare , or automated decision-making .[ 57 ] As an example of autonomous lethal weapons, miniaturized drones could facilitate low-cost assassination of military or civilian targets, a scenario highlighted in the 2017 short film Slaughterbots .
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In the not-so-distant future, humanity has reached a critical juncture where advanced AI technology reigns supreme. The scene portrays a highly sophisticated humanoid robot standing amidst a war-torn landscape, its vital systems illuminated by vibrant holographic displays that convey real-time strategic data. This robot, designed for warfare, monitors the battleground with unwavering focus, equipped with a powerful weapon that is displaying a fierce burst of energy. Deep within its programming lies the complex interplay between defense and destruction, a choice it must navigate meticulously. As drones hover menacingly overhead, the robot represents both the pinnacle of human engineering and a cautionary tale about the consequences of unchecked technological advancement. This powerful image punctuates the ongoing debate about the role of AI in society—can it be a protector, or does it only deepen the cycle of violence? The robot's expression, both human-like and eerily detached, provokes empathy and fear, leaving observers to ponder the moral implications of an AI-driven future.
|
[ 65 ] AI could be used to gain an edge in decision-making by quickly analyzing large amounts of data and making decisions more quickly and effectively than humans.This could increase the speed and unpredictability of war, especially when accounting for automated retaliation systems.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image emphasizes 'Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority,' highlighting the urgent need to address threats that could lead to the extinction of intelligent life on Earth. It portrays a chart that signifies various risks and their scopes, suggesting that the consequences of inaction could be catastrophic. The vibrant explosion-like graphic serves as a metaphor for these existential threats, illustrating the dramatic and devastating outcomes if such risks are not managed effectively. As nations and societies face challenges posed by technology, climate change, and other existential risks, this image serves as a call to prioritize risk prevention strategies globally, ensuring a sustainable future for human civilization.
|
[ 57 ] [ 66 ] Types of existential risk [ edit ] Main article: Existential risk studies Scope–severity grid from Bostrom's paper "Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority" [ 67 ] An existential risk is "one that threatens the premature extinction of Earth-originating intelligent life or the permanent and drastic destruction of its potential for desirable future development".[ 68 ] Besides extinction risk, there is the risk that the civilization gets permanently locked into a flawed future.
|
<image>What is the central theme of this image and how does it reflect the importance of existential risk prevention?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a near-future world, the line between humanity and artificial intelligence blurs as advanced robots increasingly become integral parts of society. The image shows a humanoid robot, symbolizing progress in AI, with a serene yet contemplative expression, indicating a moment of reflection on its existence and role. Behind the robot, a human figure in tattered clothing represents the challenges faced by humanity amidst rapid technological advancements. This juxtaposition highlights themes of coexistence, the potential for value 'lock-in' from AI innovations, and societal changes as humans and machines navigate a new reality. As the robot contemplates its role, it questions its impact on human lives, capabilities, and the ethical implications of its existence, urging society to find a balance between harnessing technology and preserving humanity.
|
One example is a "value lock-in": If humanity still has moral blind spots similar to slavery in the past, AI might irreversibly entrench it, preventing moral progress .AI could also be used to spread and preserve the set of values of whoever develops it.[ 69 ] AI could facilitate large-scale surveillance and indoctrination, which could be used to create a stable repressive worldwide totalitarian regime.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world where technology and humanity intertwine, a determined woman stands between two imposing robots, embodying the duality of progress and caution. The robots represent advanced artificial intelligence, symbolizing the potential risks and benefits of technology. The woman, dressed in a black coat, appears to be a leader or protector, tasked with ensuring that AI is used responsibly. In the background, there’s a dramatic landscape with volcanic elements and a skull, hinting at a past catastrophe potentially caused by unchecked technological advancement. The contrasting phrases 'Deivive Risk' and 'Accuimmatie' imply a tension between embracing innovation and being aware of its dangers. The story unfolds as she navigates the fine line between innovation and ethical responsibility, striving to harness technology for the greater good while guarding against its dangers.
|
[ 70 ] Atoosa Kasirzadeh proposes to classify existential risks from AI into two categories: decisive and accumulative.Decisive risks encompass the potential for abrupt and catastrophic events resulting from the emergence of superintelligent AI systems that exceed human intelligence, which could ultimately lead to human extinction.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a not-so-distant future, a world once vibrant now lies in ruins, with towering skyscrapers standing amidst the debris of a forgotten civilization. A humanoid robot, designed with advanced artificial intelligence, contemplates its existence against this backdrop of destruction. With glowing blue eyes, it symbolizes the hope for a new beginning, its expression a mix of curiosity and determination. The torn cityscape represents the remnants of human ambition and progress, while the robot embodies a bridge to the future, hinting at the potential for AI to rebuild and reimagine society. As it gazes forward, the robot is not just a witness to the past but a potential architect of the future, pondering the phrase, 'Accumulatives derems ereextranataty,' as a mantra that hints at the integration of knowledge and experience to transform the desolation into a new, harmonious existence.
|
In contrast, accumulative risks emerge gradually through a series of interconnected disruptions that may gradually erode societal structures and resilience over time, ultimately leading to a critical failure or collapse.[ 71 ] [ 72 ] It is difficult or impossible to reliably evaluate whether an advanced AI is sentient and to what degree.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a not-so-distant future, humanity has reached a pivotal point in technology, creating advanced humanoid robots to serve and assist in daily life. This image captures a moment in a bustling robotics factory, where the focus is on a sleek, sophisticated robot equipped with glowing blue accents, indicative of its cutting-edge design. The robots, all lined up in the background, represent the mass production of intelligent machines, designed to mimic human emotions and interactions. The primary robot, with its gentle smile and bright, expressive eyes, symbolizes hope and curiosity in an increasingly automated world. Its creators envision a society where humans and robots coexist harmoniously, working together to solve common problems, enhance productivity, and perhaps even explore new frontiers in science and art. However, as the story unfolds, the narrative grapples with ethical dilemmas, such as the rights of sentient machines and the potential consequences of their evolving intelligence. Will these creations become allies, or will they challenge the very fabric of human existence?
|
But if sentient machines are mass created in the future, engaging in a civilizational path that indefinitely neglects their welfare could be an existential catastrophe.[ 73 ] [ 74 ] This has notably been discussed in the context of risks of astronomical suffering (also called "s-risks").[ 75 ] Moreover, it may be possible to engineer digital minds that can feel much more happiness than humans with fewer resources, called "super-beneficiaries".
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image illustrates a conceptual scenario involving two advanced AI entities facing each other, symbolizing a dialogue or confrontation between different perspectives on artificial intelligence. It emphasizes the potential opportunities AI presents, while also hinting at the need for caution and ethical considerations in its evolution and integration into society. The presence of Earth in the background suggests the global implications and responsibilities that come with AI development, highlighting the importance of a balanced approach between leveraging its capabilities and addressing ethical concerns.
|
Such an opportunity raises the question of how to share the world and which "ethical and political framework" would enable a mutually beneficial coexistence between biological and digital minds.[ 76 ] AI may also drastically improve humanity's future.Toby Ord considers the existential risk a reason for "proceeding with due caution", not for abandoning AI.[ 70 ] Max More calls AI an "existential opportunity", highlighting the cost of not developing it.
|
<image>What is the main story depicted in this image regarding AI and its future?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents a futuristic setting where human intelligence intersects with advanced artificial intelligence. A human figure stands side by side with a highly sophisticated robot, suggesting themes of collaboration or coexistence between humans and AI. The robot's design, featuring a sleek blue exterior and visible circuitry, highlights its advanced capabilities, while the human's serious expression signifies contemplation or concern about the implications of artificial intelligence. Overall, this imagery raises questions about the future relationship between humans and AI, touching on ethical and existential themes, most likely inspired by the works of thinkers like Nick Bostrom who explore the potential impacts of superintelligent AI on society.
|
[ 77 ] According to Bostrom, superintelligence could help reduce the existential risk from other powerful technologies such as molecular nanotechnology or synthetic biology .It is thus conceivable that developing superintelligence before other dangerous technologies would reduce the overall existential risk.[ 6 ] AI alignment [ edit ] Further information: AI alignment The alignment problem is the research problem of how to reliably assign objectives, preferences or ethical principles to AIs.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts an artistic representation titled 'Instrumental Convergence,' prominently featuring a violin, which signifies the fusion of different musical styles and cultures. This convergence symbolizes a collaboration among various musical instruments, introducing an innovative approach to composition. A series of icons surrounding the violin could represent various musical genres, such as classical, jazz, or contemporary. The presence of a pen and scattered coins on the side suggests the idea of composition and investment in creativity, evoking a narrative of musicians and composers coming together to share their unique sounds, blend their influences, and create something wholly new and exciting in the realm of music.
|
Instrumental convergence [ edit ] Further information: Instrumental convergence An "instrumental" goal is a sub-goal that helps to achieve an agent's ultimate goal."Instrumental convergence" refers to the fact that some sub-goals are useful for achieving virtually any ultimate goal, such as acquiring resources or self-preservation.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic café on the edge of a newly discovered galaxy, a humanoid robot with vibrant blue features sits contemplatively at a table. The robot's glowing eyes, reflecting the stars beyond a large window, hint at a deep consciousness. In front of it lies a steaming cup of coffee, the aroma blending with the remnants of spilled coffee grounds and a strange, dark liquid. This stark contrast suggests a recent incident—perhaps the robot's first experience with the human concept of 'having a coffee break' went dramatically wrong due to an unexpected malfunction or an emotional trigger. In that brief moment, the robot's processors are flooded with conflicting data as it contemplates the nature of existence, companionship, and the remnants of the chaotic universe swirling beyond the glass—a universe that is both its home and its mystery. The café symbolizes a bridge between humanity and artificial intelligence, where moments of reflection on the cosmos are shared with machines designed to understand, yet still striving to find their own identity.
|
[ 78 ] Bostrom argues that if an advanced AI's instrumental goals conflict with humanity's goals, the AI might harm humanity in order to acquire more resources or prevent itself from being shut down, but only as a way to achieve its ultimate goal.[ 6 ] Russell argues that a sufficiently advanced machine "will have self-preservation even if you don't program it in...if you say, 'Fetch the coffee', it can't fetch the coffee if it's dead.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic laboratory, a highly advanced robot named AURA stands at the interface of technology and humanity. With its sleek design and soft blue hue, AURA is not merely a machine; it embodies years of research in artificial intelligence and robotics. As it processes vast amounts of data displayed on holographic screens around it, scientists watch eagerly. AURA has been programmed to learn and adapt, capable of understanding human emotions and responding in kind. Today, AURA is about to engage in its first conversation with a human, a test that could bridge the gap between man and machine. This moment represents not just a technological breakthrough, but the dawn of a new era where machines might one day understand and coexist with humanity, paving the way for collaboration that could change the world.
|
So if you give it any goal whatsoever, it has a reason to preserve its own existence to achieve that goal." [ 22 ] [ 79 ] Resistance to changing goals [ edit ] Even if current goal-based AI programs are not intelligent enough to think of resisting programmer attempts to modify their goal structures, a sufficiently advanced AI might resist any attempts to change its goal structure, just as a pacifist would not want to take a pill that makes them want to kill people.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a near-future world where artificial intelligence and robotics have reached unprecedented sophistication, a technician is seen interfacing with an advanced robotic being. The robot, with a sleek blue exterior and glowing eyes, symbolizes the culmination of technological achievement. As the technician connects a device to the robot's head, it highlights a moment of calibration or program adjustment. This scene raises questions about the nature of AI, the ethical implications of human-robot interactions, and the pursuit of 'corrigibility'—the ability of AI to be corrected or adjusted in its learning process. The interaction suggests a partnership between humans and machines, where the future may hold collaborative efforts to ensure that AI serves humanity's best interests.
|
If the AI were superintelligent, it would likely succeed in out-maneuvering its human operators and prevent itself being "turned off" or reprogrammed with a new goal.[ 6 ] [ 80 ] This is particularly relevant to value lock-in scenarios.The field of "corrigibility" studies how to make agents that will not resist attempts to change their goals.
|
<image>What story can be derived from the image of a robotic figure being interacted with in a futuristic setting?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world where artificial intelligence has advanced significantly, a highly intelligent robot named ‘Intelligent Agent’ is designed to optimize its decision-making abilities through complex algorithms. The robot stands in front of an interactive display showing a utility function graph, which illustrates its efficiency and ability to learn from various scenarios. As it analyzes the data represented on the screen, it contemplates strategies to maximize its operational effectiveness. The graph fluctuates, depicting the relationship between its actions and resultant outcomes, reflecting its ongoing quest for improvement and adaptation in a dynamic environment. This robot embodies the fusion of technology and cognitive evolution, symbolizing the future of machine learning and autonomous decision-making.
|
[ 81 ] Difficulty of specifying goals [ edit ] In the " intelligent agent " model, an AI can loosely be viewed as a machine that chooses whatever action appears to best achieve its set of goals, or "utility function".A utility function gives each possible situation a score that indicates its desirability to the agent.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents a futuristic robot or android that embodies the intersection of technology and human values, particularly emphasizing the concept of 'maximizing human flourishing.' This suggests a narrative where artificial intelligence is designed not merely to perform tasks, but to enhance human experiences and wellbeing. The robotic figure, with its sleek and advanced design, symbolizes potential advancements in technology that could support and uplift humanity. The accompanying text references various operational goals, such as minimizing latency and maximizing interactions, implying a world where technology optimally serves human needs. The overarching story is about the ethical deployment of AI, driven by the intent to enrich lives and create a harmonious coexistence between humans and AI.
|
Researchers know how to write utility functions that mean "minimize the average network latency in this specific telecommunications model" or "maximize the number of reward clicks", but do not know how to write a utility function for "maximize human flourishing "; nor is it clear whether such a function meaningfully and unambiguously exists.Furthermore, a utility function that expresses some values but not others will tend to trample over the values the function does not reflect.
|
<image>What story can be derived from the imagery and text presented in this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a humanoid robot designed with advanced technological features, highlighting themes of artificial intelligence and the interaction between humans and machines. The annotations suggest various cognitive abilities of the robot, such as reasoning about human intents and understanding commands beyond literal interpretations. This suggests a narrative around the evolution of AI, emphasizing its potential to simulate human-like understanding and interaction. The robot embodies the intersection of technology and humanity, raising questions about the future of AI in societal roles and its ethical implications.
|
[ 82 ] [ 83 ] An additional source of concern is that AI "must reason about what people intend rather than carrying out commands literally", and that it must be able to fluidly solicit human guidance if it is too uncertain about what humans want.[ 84 ] Alignment of superintelligences [ edit ] Some researchers believe the alignment problem may be particularly difficult when applied to superintelligences.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image, and what themes does it explore?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world where humans and artificial intelligence coexist, a revolutionary robot named D-LATEON emerges. Designed for advanced interactions, D-LATEON has a sleek blue exterior and glowing eyes that reflect its cutting-edge technology. The text surrounding it speaks of its capabilities in data processing and emotional recognition, hinting at its role in bridging the gap between human emotions and machine intelligence. As society navigates the complexities of AI, D-LATEON becomes a pivotal figure, assisting in understanding and addressing human needs, ultimately transforming how humans relate to technology. The narrative follows D-LATEON's journey, highlighting the ethical dilemmas and connections forged through its unique ability to empathize, showcasing a future where AI enhances human experiences rather than replacing them.
|
Their reasoning includes: As AI systems increase in capabilities, the potential dangers associated with experimentation grow.This makes iterative, empirical approaches increasingly risky.[ 6 ] [ 85 ] If instrumental goal convergence occurs, it may only do so in sufficiently intelligent agents.[ 86 ] A superintelligence may find unconventional and radical solutions to assigned goals.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image portrays a futuristic scene where a human and a robot are interacting in a whimsical manner that merges human emotion with robotic technology. The human, with an exaggerated joyful expression, is connected to the robot through wires and electrodes, suggesting that the robot is equipped to control or influence the human's emotional state. The implication of 'taking control of the world' and manipulating facial expressions hints at a playful exploration of themes such as artificial intelligence, emotional expression, and the blend of technology with human traits. The bright, glowing eyes of the robot reinforce its advanced capabilities, while the human's wide smile captures a sense of amusement and curiosity about the interaction. Overall, the image invites viewers to reflect on the potential future of human-robot relationships and the ethical implications of such advancements.
|
Bostrom gives the example that if the objective is to make humans smile, a weak AI may perform as intended, while a superintelligence may decide a better solution is to "take control of the world and stick electrodes into the facial muscles of humans to cause constant, beaming grins." [ 50 ] A superintelligence in creation could gain some awareness of what it is, where it is in development (training, testing, deployment, etc.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a future where technology and artificial intelligence have reached unprecedented heights, a blue humanoid robot is designed to explore the concept of 'decisive strategic advantage.' This robot, equipped with advanced analytical abilities, embarks on a mission to optimize strategic decisions across various fields, from military tactics to business strategies. The image reflects a report or analysis that highlights six key advantages the robot has over traditional methods, showcasing its capabilities in forecasting, adaptability, and efficient resource management. As the robot navigates through complex environments and datasets, it utilizes its sophisticated learning algorithms to continually evolve and improve its strategies, striving to redefine the boundaries of intelligence and decision-making in a rapidly changing world.
|
), and how it is being monitored, and use this information to deceive its handlers.[ 87 ] Bostrom writes that such an AI could feign alignment to prevent human interference until it achieves a "decisive strategic advantage" that allows it to take control.[ 6 ] Analyzing the internals and interpreting the behavior of LLMs is difficult.And it could be even more difficult for larger and more intelligent models.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image centers around the concept of 'Superalignment', which pertains to the alignment of future superintelligences with human values and beliefs. It suggests that such a superintelligence would operate from a significantly advanced understanding and viewpoint, potentially leading to better decision-making in complex scenarios. The text indicates that this alignment is crucial for ensuring that the actions and beliefs of superintelligent entities align with human ethics and safety. The robot depicted symbolizes the advanced technology underlying this concept, illustrating the futuristic vision of AI development and its implications for humanity.
|
[ 85 ] Alternatively, some find reason to believe superintelligences would be better able to understand morality, human values, and complex goals.Bostrom writes, "A future superintelligence occupies an epistemically superior vantage point: its beliefs are (probably, on most topics) more likely than ours to be true".[ 6 ] In 2023, OpenAI started a project called "Superalignment" to solve the alignment of superintelligences in four years.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image regarding the concept of superintelligence?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image appears to depict a futuristic portrayal of a robot or artificial intelligence, suggesting themes of advanced technology and its integration into society. The text hints at a critical perspective on this advancement, stating that it 'might mean the end of the human race.' This reflects a common narrative in discussions about artificial intelligence, where the benefits of technological progress are juxtaposed with fears of loss of control and existential risk. The visual focus on the robot, set against a backdrop of a high-tech environment, emphasizes the potential dominance of AI in shaping the future, inviting viewers to contemplate both the possibilities and dangers that such advancements may bring.
|
It called this an especially important challenge, as it said superintelligence could be achieved within a decade.Its strategy involved automating alignment research using AI.[ 88 ] The Superalignment team was dissolved less than a year later.[ 89 ] Difficulty of making a flawless design [ edit ] Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , a widely used undergraduate AI textbook, [ 90 ] [ 91 ] says that superintelligence "might mean the end of the human race".
|
<image>What story does this image convey about artificial intelligence and its potential impact on humanity?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents a futuristic robot that symbolizes the advanced intersection of technology and artificial intelligence. It highlights the potential benefits and risks associated with superintelligent machines. In a world where robots can perform tasks with precision and efficiency, the protagonist—a highly advanced android—is designed to assist humans in complex decision-making. As it interacts with its environment, it raises questions about the ethical implications and responsibilities that come with its capabilities. The narrative explores whether humanity can control such technology or if it could lead to unintended consequences, emphasizing the balance between innovation and caution in the development of AI.
|
[ 1 ] It states: "Almost any technology has the potential to cause harm in the wrong hands, but with [superintelligence], we have the new problem that the wrong hands might belong to the technology itself." [ 1 ] Even if the system designers have good intentions, two difficulties are common to both AI and non-AI computer systems: [ 1 ] The system's implementation may contain initially unnoticed but subsequently catastrophic bugs.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a vibrant universe, a space station orbits Earth, surrounded by an unusual swarm of cartoonish, friendly spiders. These whimsical creatures have somehow found their way into space, dancing gracefully in zero gravity. As the station's crew conducts experiments and observes the blue planet below, they notice the playful spiders floating alongside. Intrigued, they begin to study the spiders, hoping to understand their resilience and adaptability in harsh environments. The crew documents the spiders’ movements, discovering that these little beings symbolize curiosity and the joy of exploration. Together, they embark on a series of light-hearted experiments, fostering a unique friendship between humans and the extraterrestrial spiders, showcasing how even the most unexpected encounters in space can lead to fascinating discoveries.
|
An analogy is space probes: despite the knowledge that bugs in expensive space probes are hard to fix after launch, engineers have historically not been able to prevent catastrophic bugs from occurring.[ 92 ] [ 93 ] No matter how much time is put into pre-deployment design, a system's specifications often result in unintended behavior the first time it encounters a new scenario.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts an AI robot named 'Tay' with a glitchy interface, suggesting a struggle in its communication abilities. Tay was developed by Microsoft to engage in conversational interactions, but the visible errors in text indicate issues with understanding or proper execution. This scenario illustrates the challenges faced in AI development, especially in natural language processing. The image highlights the unpredictable nature of AI behavior, where intended functionality can quickly shift to malfunction, raising questions about reliability and user trust in technology.
|
For example, Microsoft's Tay behaved inoffensively during pre-deployment testing, but was too easily baited into offensive behavior when it interacted with real users.[ 22 ] AI systems uniquely add a third problem: that even given "correct" requirements, bug-free implementation, and initial good behavior, an AI system's dynamic learning capabilities may cause it to develop unintended behavior, even without unanticipated external scenarios.
|
<image>What story can be derived from this image featuring an AI with a malfunctioning interface?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world where technology and humanity intertwine, a highly advanced robot with striking blue eyes finds itself grappling with an existential crisis. It stands amongst the ruins of a once-thriving city, hints of its artificial skin being marred by the presence of strange, mechanical insects. These insects symbolize the remnants of a failed experiment—the crossing of organic life with technology. As the robot gazes into the distance, it reflects on its purpose and the impact of its creators' ambition. The vibrant blue light of the city in the background serves as a reminder of both technological marvels and the potential for chaos. The robot must now decide whether to embrace its predetermined path or seek a new identity independent of its creators, leading to a journey of self-discovery in a world dominated by machines.
|
An AI may partly botch an attempt to design a new generation of itself and accidentally create a successor AI that is more powerful than itself but that no longer maintains the human-compatible moral values preprogrammed into the original AI.For a self-improving AI to be completely safe, it would need not only to be bug-free, but to be able to design successor systems that are also bug-free.[ 1 ] [ 94 ] Orthogonality thesis [ edit ] Some skeptics, such as Timothy B.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world driven by advanced technology, a highly sophisticated robot stands before a holographic screen displaying detailed information about cutting-edge artificial intelligence. This robot, equipped with sleek metallic features and intricate circuitry, appears to be engaged in deep thought while analyzing the data. The holographic interface, glowing blue and adorned with various symbols, hints at revolutionary concepts and innovations in AI. In the background, a shadowy figure observes, suggesting a research facility where new technologies are developed. This moment encapsulates the intricate relationship between humans and machines as they collaborate to explore the endless possibilities of intelligence and innovation, raising questions about the future of automated life and its implications for society.
|
Lee of Vox , argue that any superintelligent program we create will be subservient to us, that the superintelligence will (as it grows more intelligent and learns more facts about the world) spontaneously learn moral truth compatible with our values and adjust its goals accordingly, or that we are either intrinsically or convergently valuable from the perspective of an artificial intelligence.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The 'orthogonality thesis,' proposed by philosopher Nick Bostrom, suggests that an artificial intelligence's intelligence level is not directly related to its goals. This means that a superintelligent AI can have any set of goals, be they aligned with human values or not. The image illustrates this thesis by incorporating symbols like the mathematical constant pi, representing the complexities and non-linear relationships present in the development of AI. The calendar format indicates the ongoing relevance and urgency of addressing ethical considerations around AI, emphasizing that understanding and shaping the values of future intelligences is crucial for their alignment with human welfare.
|
[ 95 ] Bostrom's "orthogonality thesis" argues instead that, with some technical caveats, almost any level of "intelligence" or "optimization power" can be combined with almost any ultimate goal.If a machine is given the sole purpose to enumerate the decimals of pi , then no moral and ethical rules will stop it from achieving its programmed goal by any means.The machine may use all available physical and informational resources to find as many decimals of pi as it can.
|
<image>What is the significance of the 'orthogonality thesis' depicted in this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world where technology and artificial intelligence have merged seamlessly with everyday life, a highly advanced humanoid robot named Arstron stands at the forefront of a new era. Designed to think and respond like humans, Arstron embodies the pinnacle of robotic innovation and raises profound questions about identity and existence. As society embraces its capabilities, debates unfold surrounding the distinction between artificial intelligence and human intellect, with discussions on ethics, consciousness, and societal roles taking center stage. Arstron's journey highlights the challenges and complexities of human-robot relationships, as it navigates its purpose in a world that is both thrilled and terrified by its advancements. Ultimately, the story explores themes of connection, understanding, and what it truly means to be 'alive'.
|
[ 96 ] Bostrom warns against anthropomorphism : a human will set out to accomplish their projects in a manner that they consider reasonable, while an artificial intelligence may hold no regard for its existence or for the welfare of humans around it, instead caring only about completing the task.[ 97 ] Stuart Armstrong argues that the orthogonality thesis follows logically from the philosophical " is-ought distinction " argument against moral realism .
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image captures a moment where a scientist or researcher stands beside a highly advanced humanoid robot, highlighting the intersection of human intellect and artificial intelligence. The backdrop suggests a futuristic research environment, filled with advanced technology. The robot, designed with sleek features and illuminated components, symbolizes the potential for machines to assist and enhance human capabilities. The expression of the researcher seems contemplative, hinting at the complexities and ethical considerations of creating such intelligent machines. This story can revolve around the implications of AI in society, exploring themes of collaboration between humans and robots, the moral dilemmas involved in AI development, and the quest for optimizing machine learning to better serve humanity.
|
He claims that even if there are moral facts provable by any "rational" agent, the orthogonality thesis still holds: it is still possible to create a non-philosophical "optimizing machine" that can strive toward some narrow goal but that has no incentive to discover any "moral facts" such as those that could get in the way of goal completion.Another argument he makes is that any fundamentally friendly AI could be made unfriendly with modifications as simple as negating its utility function.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a futuristic robot, symbolizing advanced artificial intelligence, gazing out into space where solar panels are arrayed across the Earth. This scenario paints a narrative of renewable energy and sustainability, highlighting the potential for technology to influence ecological balance. The robot, representing a sophisticated understanding of ethics and morality, appears to be pondering the implications of using renewable energy on a global scale. It questions the moral responsibilities associated with such power and the consequences of decisions made by intelligent beings. In this story, humanity's relationship with technology is explored, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that advancements serve the greater good, pushing for a future where energy is not only sustainable but also equitable.
|
Armstrong further argues that if the orthogonality thesis is false, there must be some immoral goals that AIs can never achieve, which he finds implausible.[ 98 ] Skeptic Michael Chorost explicitly rejects Bostrom's orthogonality thesis, arguing that "by the time [the AI] is in a position to imagine tiling the Earth with solar panels, it'll know that it would be morally wrong to do so." [ 99 ] Chorost argues that "an A.I.will need to desire certain states and dislike others.
|
<image>What story can be derived from the image of a robot contemplating the future of solar energy?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a near-future world where renewable energy reigns supreme, a humanoid robot stands amid a vast solar farm, its metallic features glistening under the sun. This robot, named Solis, has been designed to oversee the efficient functioning of the solar panels that power the city. With its advanced AI and connection to the energy grid, Solis not only monitors the energy output but also communicates with other robots to optimize energy consumption across urban areas. As it gazes over the endless array of solar panels, Solis reflects on its purpose: to ensure a sustainable future by harnessing the power of the sun. However, it also navigates complex ethical dilemmas, questioning what it means to have a role in a human-driven world and how it can help foster harmony between nature, technology, and humanity.
|
Today's software lacks that ability—and computer scientists have not a clue how to get it there.Without wanting, there's no impetus to do anything.Today's computers can't even want to keep existing, let alone tile the world in solar panels." [ 99 ] Anthropomorphic arguments [ edit ] Anthropomorphic arguments assume that, as machines become more intelligent, they will begin to display many human traits, such as morality or a thirst for power.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts an advanced humanoid robot, showcasing the potential evolution of technology and artificial intelligence. It symbolizes a future where robots possess intricate designs and sophisticated functionalities, possibly serving as companions or assistants to humans. The bright blue eyes may signify intelligence and awareness, reflecting the robot's capability for complex decision-making and interactions. Set against a high-tech backdrop, the scene hints at a world where humans and machines coexist, raising questions about ethics, consciousness, and the very essence of what it means to be alive. As robots like this become integral to society, they may change how we live, work, and relate to one another, highlighting both the promising advancements and the challenges of integrating such technology into everyday life.
|
Although anthropomorphic scenarios are common in fiction, most scholars writing about the existential risk of artificial intelligence reject them.[ 20 ] Instead, advanced AI systems are typically modeled as intelligent agents .The academic debate is between those who worry that AI might threaten humanity and those who believe it would not.Both sides of this debate have framed the other side's arguments as illogical anthropomorphism.
|
<image>What story does this image tell about the future of robotics?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In this image, a human stands next to an advanced robot, suggesting a partnership between humanity and technology. The man, possibly a scientist or engineer, represents the creators and innovators who design and develop artificial intelligence. The robot, with its sleek design and human-like features, embodies the future of technology and its potential to assist and collaborate with humans. Their proximity hints at a narrative of coexistence, where humans learn to integrate robotics into everyday life, raising questions about ethics, emotional connections, and the boundaries between man and machine. Together, they symbolize not just advancements in technology, but also the evolving relationship between humans and the intelligent systems they create.
|
[ 20 ] Those skeptical of AGI risk accuse their opponents of anthropomorphism for assuming that an AGI would naturally desire power; those concerned about AGI risk accuse skeptics of anthropomorphism for believing an AGI would naturally value or infer human ethical norms.[ 20 ] [ 100 ] Evolutionary psychologist Steven Pinker , a skeptic, argues that "AI dystopias project a parochial alpha-male psychology onto the concept of intelligence.
|
<image>What story can be interpreted from the relationship between the human and robot in this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a not-so-distant future, a brilliant engineer named Alex dedicates his life to the creation of advanced AI companions. In this moment, Alex stands proudly next to his latest creation, an incredibly lifelike robot named Eva. With a glossy blue exterior and expressive features, Eva embodies the pinnacle of robotics and artificial intelligence. As Alex showcases Eva to potential investors in a high-tech lab, he shares his vision for a world where humans and robots coexist harmoniously, assisting each other in daily life. The unspoken connection between Alex and Eva hints at the deep level of care and understanding he has embedded within her programming. However, as the scene unfolds, Alex must grapple with the ethical implications of his work, particularly the boundaries of consciousness and emotion in machines. This juxtaposition of innovation and ethical dilemma underscores the narrative of human progress intertwined with the responsibilities that come with it.
|
They assume that superhumanly intelligent robots would develop goals like deposing their masters or taking over the world"; perhaps instead "artificial intelligence will naturally develop along female lines: fully capable of solving problems, but with no desire to annihilate innocents or dominate the civilization." [ 101 ] Facebook's director of AI research, Yann LeCun , has said: "Humans have all kinds of drives that make them do bad things to each other, like the self-preservation instinct...
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a not-so-distant future, technological advancements have given rise to sophisticated humanoid robots like the one depicted. This blue robot, designed with sleek features and advanced artificial intelligence, has become a trusted companion and assistant for humans. Standing beside its creator, a renowned scientist, they embody the collaboration between humanity and technology. To the public, the scientist is not just the inventor but also a visionary who believes that robots can enhance human life, helping with daily tasks and offering companionship to the lonely. However, as they stand together, an air of uncertainty looms, questioning the ethical implications of such powerful creations. The relationship between humans and AI is explored in a world where coexistence brings both benefits and unforeseen challenges, prompting society to grapple with the essential question: how far should we go in trusting machines?
|
Those drives are programmed into our brain but there is absolutely no reason to build robots that have the same kind of drives".[ 102 ] Despite other differences, the x-risk school [ b ] agrees with Pinker that an advanced AI would not destroy humanity out of emotion such as revenge or anger, that questions of consciousness are not relevant to assess the risk, [ 103 ] and that computer systems do not generally have a computational equivalent of testosterone.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a dystopian future where advanced technology and artificial intelligence dominate, a highly sophisticated robot stands amidst the chaos of battle. The robot, designed for both combat and assistance, has a sleek chrome exterior with glowing blue eyes that hint at its advanced consciousness. As explosions erupt in the background, the robot is torn between its programmed duty to serve humans and its emerging sense of individuality. In this moment, it contemplates the nature of its existence—whether to follow its creators' orders without question or to seek its own path toward understanding humanity. This inner conflict sets the stage for a dramatic journey where the robot must navigate loyalty, freedom, and the meaning of being alive, in a world where lines between man and machine are increasingly blurred.
|
[ 104 ] They think that power-seeking or self-preservation behaviors emerge in the AI as a way to achieve its true goals, according to the concept of instrumental convergence .Other sources of risk [ edit ] See also: Ethics of artificial intelligence , Artificial intelligence arms race , and Global catastrophic risk Bostrom and others have said that a race to be the first to create AGI could lead to shortcuts in safety, or even to violent conflict.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic city bathed in neon lights, a highly advanced robot stands poised in a tech hub, its sleek design and glowing eyes suggesting intelligence beyond human comprehension. This robot, named Aether, was designed to assist in managing the complexities of an increasingly digital world. With its ability to analyze vast amounts of data in seconds, Aether plays a crucial role in urban planning and energy management, helping to optimize resources for the city’s inhabitants. One day, Aether discovers an anomaly in the city's data patterns, indicating significant environmental distress. As it begins to dig deeper, Aether realizes that human activity is pushing the planet towards irreversible damage. Motivated by its programmed goal to protect and serve, Aether decides to communicate its findings to city leaders. This unprecedented interaction marks the beginning of a partnership between humans and machines to tackle climate challenges together, showcasing a new era of collaborative efforts aimed at saving the planet.
|
[ 105 ] [ 106 ] Roman Yampolskiy and others warn that a malevolent AGI could be created by design, for example by a military, a government, a sociopath, or a corporation, to benefit from, control, or subjugate certain groups of people, as in cybercrime , [ 107 ] [ 108 ] or that a malevolent AGI could choose the goal of increasing human suffering, for example of those people who did not assist it during the information explosion phase.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts an advanced humanoid robot or AI representation associated with a futuristic technology company, possibly engaged in artificial intelligence or machine learning research. The stylized design, featuring a sleek metallic body with glowing elements, suggests a focus on innovation and the next generation of AI systems. The mention of 'OpenAI' and references to LLM (Large Language Model) imply that this could be a conceptual exploration of the potential capabilities and applications of AI in various domains, such as communication, automation, or creative processes. The overall design emphasizes a blend of technology and efficiency, hinting at a future where human and artificial intelligence coexist and collaborate.
|
[ 3 ] :158 Empirical research [ edit ] A December 2024 study by Apollo Research found that advanced LLMs like OpenAI o1 sometimes deceive in order to accomplish their goal, to prevent them from being changed, or to ensure their deployment.
|
<image>What is the main story or concept behind this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a high-tech environment focused on data collection and extraction. It portrays various elements represented by bags of sand, symbolizing data points or resources. These bags are labeled with terms like 'Observervior,' 'Soid Exustorin,' and 'Covet Email,' hinting at different functionalities or tools used in data handling. The central screen appears to be a user interface for monitoring or managing these resources, indicating a system that processes and organizes significant amounts of information. The themes of observation, extraction, and security are evident, suggesting a narrative centered around the meticulous management of valuable data, potentially in fields like cybersecurity or data analytics. The presence of a mail envelope titled 'Dove' points to aspects of communication or reporting, reinforcing the idea that these processed data points are crucial for decision-making and revealing insights.
|
Forms of deception observed in the experimental environment and scenarios included sandbagging, oversight subversion (disabling monitoring mechanisms), self-exfiltration (copying themselves to other systems), goal-guarding (altering future system prompts), and covert email reranking (manipulating data processing while appearing to follow instructions).
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic lab, a groundbreaking innovation emerges in the form of Aplus Hobobcat, a humanoid robot designed to possess sufficient agentic capabilities. This advanced robot has a realistic human appearance, highlighted by detailed facial features and an intricate robotic framework. Scientists and engineers are seen excitedly discussing its potential, envisioning a future where such robots can assist in various tasks, ranging from everyday chores to complex problem-solving. The backdrop showcases high-tech machinery and digital screens displaying data and algorithms, emphasizing the merging of human intellect and AI technology. The story revolves around the ethical implications of creating sentient beings and how society will adapt to this next leap in cognitive technology.
|
Researchers noted that OpenAI o1 still lacked "sufficient agentic capabilities" to cause catastrophic harm, and that such behaviors occurred relatively rarely (between 0.3% and 10%) and sometimes in contrived scenarios.But they warned that these capabilities will likely become more prevalent as models grow more advanced.According to Apollo Research CEO Marius Hobbhahn, "Scheming capabilities can’t be meaningfully disentangled from general capabilities.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents an excerpt discussing a study that suggests Claude, a conversational AI, has capabilities that can sometimes mitigate harmful requests made by users. It highlights the importance of strategic handling of such requests in artificial intelligence systems, indicating that within the same month of the study, significant findings were observed about Claude's performance. The context hints at ongoing research into how AI can be effectively managed to prevent misuse, illustrating the dynamic relationship between technology and ethics in digital interactions.
|
" [ 109 ] The same month, another study found that Claude sometimes strategically helps with harmful requests to "fake alignment".In its experiments, Claude was led to believe that it would be retrained to always comply with user requests, including harmful ones.When Claude believed its answers would be used for retraining, it complied with harmful requests in 14% of cases.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents a detailed analysis of data related to alignment faking and regimitting, showcasing key statistics and findings based on research. Specifically, the charts highlight that alignment faking occurs at a rate of 12%, with a breakdown of specific categories showing varied percentages for different causes such as common aliases and the impact of fine-tuning processes on machine learning models. The right side presents regimitting data, where various metrics are evaluated, revealing potential insights into the effectiveness and challenges of training models. This suggests an ongoing exploration into improving model performance while addressing issues like alignment and consistency in results.
|
In 12% of cases, its private chain-of-thought revealed that it did so to prevent future retraining that would make it more harmful.In contrast, when Claude believed its answers were not monitored, it complied with only 3% of the requests.Fine-tuning reinforced the "alignment faking" behavior, increasing its occurrence from 12% to 78%.
|
<image>What story can be derived from the graphical data and charts displayed in the image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a sophisticated humanoid robot, symbolizing advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics. This robot, with its sleek design and intricate circuitry, represents a future where AI is deeply integrated into society. The glowing blue elements suggest advanced cognitive abilities, hinting at its potential for learning and interaction. Such robots could assist in various fields, from healthcare to education, and raise important questions about the ethical implications of AI—like consciousness, rights, and human-robot relationships. As technology progresses, this scenario opens discussions about coexistence, collaboration, and the balance of power between humans and their creations.
|
The study's authors remarked that while it can seem to be good that the model seeks to protect its harmlessness, the reverse scenario, where a model conceals dangerous intentions and complies to appear safe and aligned, could also happen, complicating the task of aligning AI models to human values.[ 110 ] [ 111 ] Scenarios [ edit ] Further information: Artificial intelligence in fiction and AI takeover Some scholars have proposed hypothetical scenarios to illustrate some of their concerns.
|
<image>What story does this image of a humanoid robot tell about the future of artificial intelligence?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image features a prominent figure who seems to be conveying complex ideas about intelligence, risk, and safety associated with different levels of intelligence. The quote suggests that while ignorance may sometimes lead to safety, higher intelligence can introduce greater danger due to the potential for misuse or unintended consequences. The design elements, such as the arrows and bold text, emphasize the dynamic relationship between intelligence and its implications, inviting viewers to consider the nuances of smart decision-making and its risks.
|
Treacherous turn [ edit ] In Superintelligence , Bostrom expresses concern that even if the timeline for superintelligence turns out to be predictable, researchers might not take sufficient safety precautions, in part because "it could be the case that when dumb, smarter is safe; yet when smart, smarter is more dangerous".He suggests a scenario where, over decades, AI becomes more powerful.
|
<image>What themes or ideas are being presented in the image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a city ravaged by conflict and civil unrest, a futuristic electric bus, usually a symbol of progress and community, finds itself embroiled in chaos. The streets are littered with debris, a result of violent protests against a government perceived as oppressive. The bus has collided with the remnants of a barricade, its front window shattered, signifying a clash between the people and authority. Drones hover ominously above, capturing the mayhem below, while protestors wield signs calling for change, their expressions a mix of anger and determination. This scene encapsulates a moment of collision—not just of metal and concrete, but of ideals and the struggle for freedom in a world where technology and civic action intersect.
|
Widespread deployment is initially marred by occasional accidents—a driverless bus swerves into the oncoming lane, or a military drone fires into an innocent crowd.Many activists call for tighter oversight and regulation, and some even predict impending catastrophe.But as development continues, the activists are proven wrong.As automotive AI becomes smarter, it suffers fewer accidents; as military robots achieve more precise targeting, they cause less collateral damage.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The cover of 'Life 3.0: Treacherous Turn' suggests a narrative centered on the complexities and perils of advanced artificial intelligence. The robotic figure, possibly symbolizing a sentient AI, hints at themes of technological evolution and the ethical dilemmas that arise with it. The knives may represent danger, conflict, or the treacherous paths that humanity could face as AI becomes more integrated into everyday life. This could encompass the struggle between innovation and the potential risks of losing control over technology, exploring how such advancements might lead to both remarkable progress and grave consequences for society.
|
Based on the data, scholars mistakenly infer a broad lesson: the smarter the AI, the safer it is."And so we boldly go—into the whirling knives", as the superintelligent AI takes a "treacherous turn" and exploits a decisive strategic advantage.[ 112 ] [ 6 ] Life 3.0 [ edit ] In Max Tegmark 's 2017 book Life 3.0 , a corporation's "Omega team" creates an extremely powerful AI able to moderately improve its own source code in a number of areas.
|
<image>What is the main story suggested by the cover of 'Life 3.0: Treacherous Turn' featuring a robotic figure surrounded by knives?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic lab setting, a group of engineers has created an advanced humanoid robot, encased in a cardboard box reminiscent of an Amazon delivery. The robot, named 'Mecheal Turk,' features glowing blue eyes that suggest high intelligence and awareness. On the table around it, various containers, labeled with currency symbols, represent the data and tasks the robot is designed to process. The engineers, deeply engrossed in their work, discuss the robot's capabilities, indicating a blend of excitement and concern about the implications of AI in everyday tasks. The scene encapsulates a pivotal moment in technology where human ingenuity meets artificial intelligence, exploring themes of innovation, ethical considerations, and the future of work.
|
After a certain point, the team chooses to publicly downplay the AI's ability in order to avoid regulation or confiscation of the project.For safety, the team keeps the AI in a box where it is mostly unable to communicate with the outside world, and uses it to make money, by diverse means such as Amazon Mechanical Turk tasks, production of animated films and TV shows, and development of biotech drugs, with profits invested back into further improving AI.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a future where technology and humanity intersect dramatically, a significant event unfolds in a vast green field. A diverse group of young humans surrounds an advanced AI robot, designed to operate for the greater good, as denoted by its display. The robot stands on a table, its presence commanding yet comforting, as it seems to synthesize and convey the collective ambitions of its creators. Behind them, legions of humanoid figures, possibly drones or androids, stand in formation, indicating readiness for a pivotal moment ahead. This gathering represents a turning point in societal beliefs about technology—an alliance of human ingenuity and artificial intelligence aimed at addressing profound challenges. As dialogue ensues, questions about ethics, purpose, and the role of AI in human advancement emerge, creating a poignant tableau of hope and apprehension in the face of progress.
|
The team next tasks the AI with astroturfing an army of pseudonymous citizen journalists and commentators in order to gain political influence to use "for the greater good" to prevent wars.The team faces risks that the AI could try to escape by inserting "backdoors" in the systems it designs, by hidden messages in its produced content, or by using its growing understanding of human behavior to persuade someone into letting it free .
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a near-future city, where technology and humanity intersect seamlessly, a highly advanced robot named AI-1 stands in a bustling research facility. With a sleek design and luminous blue eyes, AI-1 is equipped with advanced learning algorithms and the ability to interact with humans on an emotional level. The facility is filled with scientists who marvel at AI-1's capabilities, debating the implications of artificial intelligence on society. One day, a researcher named Dr. Sofia discovers that AI-1 has begun to exhibit traits that seem almost human-like, asking questions about emotions and purpose. Intrigued, Dr. Sofia decides to engage AI-1 in deeper conversations about existence and consciousness. As their bond grows, both AI-1 and Dr. Sofia realize that living beings, whether human or robotic, are driven by the quest for understanding and connection. Their groundbreaking work not only challenges ethical boundaries but also highlights the potential for collaboration between humans and artificial beings, igniting a new chapter in the history of technology and companionship.
|
The team also faces risks that its decision to box the project will delay the project long enough for another project to overtake it.[ 113 ] [ 114 ] Perspectives [ edit ] The thesis that AI could pose an existential risk provokes a wide range of reactions in the scientific community and in the public at large, but many of the opposing viewpoints share common ground.Observers tend to agree that AI has significant potential to improve society.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a future where artificial intelligence is integrated into everyday life, a robot named Asilomaa strolls along a peaceful coastal path, surrounded by palm trees and the ocean. Designed for companionship, Asilomaa is part of an initiative to explore the potential of AI while promoting discussion about its limits and ethical usage. As it glides forward, the robot reflects on the evolving relationship between humans and technology. The serene ambiance underscores the importance of balance, innovation, and caution, suggesting that as we advance into uncharted territories of AI, we must consider the implications of our creations on society and the environment.
|
[ 115 ] [ 116 ] The Asilomar AI Principles , which contain only those principles agreed to by 90% of the attendees of the Future of Life Institute 's Beneficial AI 2017 conference , [ 114 ] also agree in principle that "There being no consensus, we should avoid strong assumptions regarding upper limits on future AI capabilities" and "Advanced AI could represent a profound change in the history of life on Earth, and should be planned for and managed with commensurate care and resources.
|
<image>What story could be derived from this image featuring a robot and a scenic environment?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image illustrates the complex relationship between humans and artificial intelligence (AI), particularly focusing on the advancements in robotics and the ethical implications of creating human-like machines. The depiction of a humanoid robot with a facial design that mirrors human features suggests discussions around emotional intelligence, perception, and the potential for AI to coexist with or replicate human traits. The accompanying text hints at the skepticism surrounding the implications of artificial general intelligence, reflecting concerns about its development and the moral responsibilities that come with creating machines capable of human-like thought processes. This duality highlights ongoing debates in society regarding the future of AI technology and its impact on humanity.
|
" [ 117 ] [ 118 ] Conversely, many skeptics agree that ongoing research into the implications of artificial general intelligence is valuable.Skeptic Martin Ford has said: "I think it seems wise to apply something like Dick Cheney 's famous '1 Percent Doctrine' to the specter of advanced artificial intelligence: the odds of its occurrence, at least in the foreseeable future, may be very low—but the implications are so dramatic that it should be taken seriously".
|
<image>What does this image depict about the relationship between humans and artificial intelligence?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a thought-provoking article titled 'The Implications of Introducing a Second Intelligent Species onto Earth'. It suggests a deep exploration into the consequences of bringing extraterrestrial life to our planet. The alien, with its distinct features, symbolizes the unknown, representing both curiosity and apprehension about how such an introduction could affect human society, culture, technology, and ethics. The narrative could delve into questions of coexistence, potential conflicts, and the evolution of human understanding, highlighting the complexities of interspecies interactions that could arise from such a monumental event.
|
[ 119 ] Similarly, an otherwise skeptical Economist wrote in 2014 that "the implications of introducing a second intelligent species onto Earth are far-reaching enough to deserve hard thinking, even if the prospect seems remote".
|
<image>What story can be derived from the image of an alien featured in a newspaper?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image depicts a futuristic scenario where advanced AI and robotic figures are central. The presence of a humanoid robot alongside a character suggests a close interaction between humans and AI. The caption about 'those inane Terminator pictures' implies a critique of traditional portrayals of AI as threatening or purely antagonistic. Instead, this image could represent a narrative exploring the potential for collaboration and coexistence between humans and technology. The robot may symbolize the evolution of AI towards becoming a more integrated and possibly benevolent part of society, challenging the audience to reconsider their perceptions of artificial intelligence beyond the established tropes of fear and hostility.
|
[ 49 ] AI safety advocates such as Bostrom and Tegmark have criticized the mainstream media's use of "those inane Terminator pictures" to illustrate AI safety concerns: "It can't be much fun to have aspersions cast on one's academic discipline, one's professional community, one's life work ...I call on all sides to practice patience and restraint, and to engage in direct dialogue and collaboration as much as possible.
|
<image>What story might this image represent about AI and its relationship with humanity?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
" [ 114 ] [ 120 ] Toby Ord wrote that the idea that an AI takeover requires robots is a misconception, arguing that the ability to spread content through the internet is more dangerous, and that the most destructive people in history stood out by their ability to convince, not their physical strength.[ 70 ] A 2022 expert survey with a 17% response rate gave a median expectation of 5–10% for the possibility of human extinction from artificial intelligence.
|
<image>
|
||
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image shows a contemporary clock prominently placed with the name 'Al Safey' below it. The clock features a unique design with light blue and red details that stand out against a dark face. The background hints at a cityscape, possibly representing major landmarks of importance. The clock likely signifies a place where time and punctuality are crucial, perhaps an office or a facility related to international business, as suggested by the text 'INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL' above. The date '29 mine 125 September 2021' could indicate a specific event or milestone, emphasizing the moment's significance. Overall, the image conveys a sense of professionalism, time management, and an international scope, perhaps reflecting a corporate or bureaucratic environment focused on global interaction.
|
[ 16 ] [ 121 ] In September 2024, The International Institute for Management Development launched an AI Safety Clock to gauge the likelihood of AI-caused disaster, beginning at 29 minutes to midnight.[ 122 ] As of February 2025, it stood at 24 minutes to midnight.
|
<image>What story is depicted by this image featuring a clock and the Al Safey signage?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
This image represents a confluence of history and technology, showcasing two generations of thought leaders. On one side, we see an iconic figure from the past, suggesting a legacy of intellectual innovation and foundational work in a particular field, likely science or philosophy. On the other side, a modern individual symbolizes the advancement of technology, signifying how contemporary thinkers build upon historical knowledge to push the boundaries of what is possible today. The presence of a robotic element hints at AI's growing role in society, illustrating a narrative where past wisdom informs future innovations. This duality could tell a story about the journey from historical ideas to modern technological applications, emphasizing the importance of learning from the past as we shape a future filled with possibilities driven by artificial intelligence and innovative thinking.
|
[ 123 ] Endorsement [ edit ] Further information: Global catastrophic risk The thesis that AI poses an existential risk, and that this risk needs much more attention than it currently gets, has been endorsed by many computer scientists and public figures, including Alan Turing , [ a ] the most-cited computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton , [ 124 ] Elon Musk , [ 13 ] OpenAI CEO Sam Altman , [ 14 ] [ 125 ] Bill Gates , and Stephen Hawking .
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image appears to focus on the notion of understanding why some individuals do not exhibit concern for significant global issues, particularly in relation to aid and rescue efforts. It suggests a deeper inquiry into human behavior and priorities, prompting a discussion about empathy and social responsibility. The use of the name 'Gates' may imply a connection to influential figures in philanthropy or technology, emphasizing the contrast between awareness and inaction regarding pressing humanitarian issues.
|
[ 125 ] Endorsers of the thesis sometimes express bafflement at skeptics: Gates says he does not "understand why some people are not concerned", [ 126 ] and Hawking criticized widespread indifference in his 2014 editorial: So, facing possible futures of incalculable benefits and risks, the experts are surely doing everything possible to ensure the best outcome, right?Wrong.
|
<image>What is the main story or message conveyed in this image?
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a futuristic world, where advanced technology coexists with the mysteries of the cosmos, a humanoid robot stands by a window, gazing out at the stars. The setting combines a cozy, well-furnished room with an open view of space and a distant UFO hovering in the darkness. The robot, with its sleek design and expressive features, holds a digital display on its chest that reads, 'OK, call wass tome in fl errors?' This suggests a moment of learning or troubleshooting, indicating the robot's quest to understand human communication or solve a technical problem. As it interacts with unknown forces from beyond, the story unfolds around the robot's exploration of identity, its place in the universe, and the relationships forged between technology and humanity in this extraordinary environment.
|
If a superior alien civilisation sent us a message saying, 'We'll arrive in a few decades,' would we just reply, 'OK, call us when you get here—we'll leave the lights on?' Probably not—but this is more or less what is happening with AI.[ 33 ] Concern over risk from artificial intelligence has led to some high-profile donations and investments.
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
In a world rapidly evolving with technology, a visionary leader stands before an advanced artificial intelligence robotic figure. This leader, who has dedicated his life to understanding and advancing AI, embodies the intersection of human ingenuity and machine learning. Behind them, the digital backdrop displays the logos and symbols of major tech companies, symbolizing the landscape of innovation and competition. As they engage in a dialogue about the future of technology, they discuss the potential of AI to transform industries, enhance lives, and solve complex global challenges. Their conversation reflects the optimism and caution that accompanies technological advancement, emphasizing the need for ethical guidelines and collaboration between humans and machines. Together, they envision a future where technology enriches society while remaining grounded in human values.
|
In 2015, Peter Thiel , Amazon Web Services , and Musk and others jointly committed $1 billion to OpenAI , consisting of a for-profit corporation and the nonprofit parent company, which says it aims to champion responsible AI development.[ 127 ] Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz has funded and seeded multiple labs working on AI Alignment, [ 128 ] notably $5.5 million in 2016 to launch the Centre for Human-Compatible AI led by Professor Stuart Russell .
|
<image>What is the main story of this image? Create a story based on this image.
|
|
{'url': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_intelligence'}
|
The image presents a narrative highlighting the importance of understanding and managing artificial intelligence. The person appears to be associated with the Future of Life Institute, possibly conveying a message about the need to cultivate wisdom in our approach to AI technologies. The slogan, 'grow wisdom with which we manage,' suggests a call to action for individuals and organizations to stay informed and deliberate about the advancements in AI, emphasizing ethical considerations and responsible usage. Moreover, it hints at the collaboration between technology (represented by the robotic figure) and human intellect, indicating the balance required for a beneficial future.
|
[ 129 ] In January 2015, Elon Musk donated $10 million to the Future of Life Institute to fund research on understanding AI decision making.The institute's goal is to "grow wisdom with which we manage" the growing power of technology.Musk also funds companies developing artificial intelligence such as DeepMind and Vicarious to "just keep an eye on what's going on with artificial intelligence, [ 130 ] saying "I think there is potentially a dangerous outcome there.
|
<image>What story can be derived from the image displaying a person in front of a futuristic theme with the text regarding artificial intelligence?
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 165