Datasets:
corbt
/
enron-emails

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
message_id
stringlengths
39
45
subject
stringlengths
0
258
from
stringlengths
0
112
to
listlengths
1
1.03k
cc
listlengths
1
457
bcc
listlengths
1
457
date
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]date
1980-01-01 00:00:00
2044-01-04 22:48:58
body
stringlengths
1
2.01M
file_name
stringlengths
10
65
<22639369.1075842019443.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-23T23:19:35Z
Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore the number of gas transactions for Mar 23 is 8 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/43.
<26176289.1075842019467.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-21T23:29:23Z
Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore the number of gas transactions for Mar 21 is 6 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/44.
<12741192.1075842019494.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-16T00:10:15Z
The previous information that was sent out included internal transactions. As of today the list would display external transactions only. Call me if you have any questions. Regards jr 3-6460 Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore the number of gas transactions for Mar 15 is 18 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/45.
<30390279.1075842019520.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Count and Volumes for Mar 15, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-16T00:05:07Z
US Power Numbers have been revised
zipper-a/tradecounts/46.
<3864678.1075842019545.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-14T23:12:54Z
Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore the number of gas transactions for Mar 14 is 6 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/47.
<25820144.1075842019571.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-13T23:24:26Z
Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore the number of gas transactions for Mar 13 is 48 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/48.
<33261542.1075842019598.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Weekly Nymex Converter 03-05-01 through 03-09-01
2001-03-13T00:44:36Z
Special Announcement ! The Weekly Nymex Converter is now available for viewing and download on the EOLinfo Intranet Site located at http://eolinfo.enron.com To access this week's Weekly Nymex Converter, follow the above link. Once in the intranet site, click on the "Reports" section, then click on "Secured Reports" and select the link entitled "Weekly Nymex Converter". Then simply enter your regular Windows login and password when prompted. The report will appear automatically. We look forward to your comments, so please feel free to contact either Pete Berzins at extension 57597 or Bryan Deluca at extension 36161 if you have any questions, comments or feedback. Thank you, Torrey Moorer Manager, EOL Reporting x36218
zipper-a/tradecounts/49.
<26894534.1075842018392.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Count and Volumes for May 30, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-31T01:30:37Z
EnronOnline Trade Counts and Volume for May 30, 2001 EXTERNAL INTERNAL TOTAL COUNTRY COMMODITY CATEGORY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY UNIT OF MEASURE Austria Power Physical 10 6,305 0 0 10 6,305 MWh Belgium Natural Gas Physical 9 217,500 0 0 9 217,500 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Financial 28 15,116,500 16 3,812,500 44 18,929,000 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Physical 303 18,042,106 0 0 303 18,042,106 MMBtu Canada Power Financial 2 300 0 0 2 300 MWh (Canada) France Power Physical 5 2,553 0 0 5 2,553 MWh Germany Power Physical 65 1,005,479 0 0 65 1,005,479 MWh Germany Power Physical Option 1 219,000 0 0 1 219,000 MWh Netherlands Metals Physical 2 40 0 0 2 40 European Alum 25 mt Lot Netherlands Power Physical 1 43,800 0 0 1 43,800 MWh Norway Power Financial 19 294,696 0 0 19 294,696 MWh Singapore Crude Financial 1 50,000 0 0 1 50,000 Barrel Switzerland Power Physical 19 14,729 0 0 19 14,729 MWh United Kingdom Crude Financial 16 790,000 6 170,000 22 960,000 Barrel United Kingdom LPG Financial 2 12,000 0 0 2 12,000 metric tonnes/month United Kingdom LPG Financial 1 3,000 0 0 1 3,000 mt United Kingdom Metals Financial 502 17,225 58 125 560 17,350 LME Registered mt Lot United Kingdom Natural Gas Physical NBP 63 8,266,400 2 278,500 65 8,544,900 MMBtu United Kingdom Oil Products Financial 2 10,000 0 0 2 10,000 IPE mt United Kingdom Power Physical 32 2,281,440 0 0 32 2,281,440 MWh USA Coal Physical 0 0 1 11 1 11 COAL-Tons/Barges/Mnth USA Crude Financial 345 15,975,000 124 5,170,000 469 21,145,000 Barrel USA Crude Financial Option 6 300,000 6 300,000 12 600,000 Barrel USA Crude Physical 6 496,000 0 0 6 496,000 Barrel USA Emissions Physical 1 0 1 0 Emission allowance USA Gas Pipeline Capacity Physical 3 24,200 0 0 3 24,200 MMBtu USA LPG Financial 3 90,000 0 0 3 90,000 Gallon USA Metals Physical 1 40 0 0 1 40 COMEX Physical Copper Lots USA Natural Gas Financial 1,679 744,766,332 1,163 477,806,030 2,842 1,222,572,362 MMBtu USA Natural Gas Financial Option 30 28,320,000 2 2,000,000 32 30,320,000 MMBTU USA Natural Gas Physical 1,856 47,729,332 45 395,565 1,901 48,124,897 MMBtu USA Oil Products Financial 13 530,000 8 135,000 21 665,000 Barrel USA Paper Physical 1 16 0 1 16 Short Tons (+/- 5%) USA Power Financial 100 1,730,232 11 75,884 111 1,806,116 MWh USA Power Physical 743 14,665,986 187 4,045,290 930 18,711,276 MWh USA Rate and Currency Financial 0 0 3 4,900,000 3 4,900,000 EUR/1 USA Rate and Currency Financial 0 0 5 20,000,000 5 20,000,000 FX USD USA Weather Financial 2 4 0 0 2 4 Cooling Degree Day 5,872 1,637 7,509
zipper-a/tradecounts/5.
<9910038.1075842019623.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-12T23:07:25Z
Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore the number of gas transactions for Mar 12 is 10 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/50.
<27374282.1075842019649.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-09T22:54:15Z
Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore gas transactions for Mar 9 is 6 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/51.
<14746676.1075842019675.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-08T23:07:15Z
Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore gas transactions for Mar 8 is 14 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/52.
<14353097.1075842019703.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-07T23:23:04Z
Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore gas transactions for Mar 7 is 10 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/53.
<9692369.1075842019727.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Spreads Transactions
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-06T23:14:01Z
Total Aluminium 17 Total Copper 27 Total Gas 3 Note: Transactions are in pairs, therefore gas is 6 etc.
zipper-a/tradecounts/54.
<26440021.1075842019753.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
RE: Trade Count and Volumes for Feb 26, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-02-27T14:27:42Z
I have formatted the volume numbers in the past to show the commas, but I forgot to do that yesterday. Thanks for pointing that out to me. I will make sure to format them in the future and I will send it out to the usual mailing list starting tonight. Regards jr From: Andy Zipper/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/27/2001 08:20 AM To: Justin Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: RE: Trade Count and Volumes for Feb 26, 2001 Justin, can we get the comma separator for the total qty column ? Looks good though. If we can do that I would like to put this into production for usual mailing list. -----Original Message----- From: Rostant, Justin Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:50 PM To: Zipper, Andy; Bridges, Michael Subject: Trade Count and Volumes for Feb 26, 2001 <Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
zipper-a/tradecounts/55.
<16095167.1075842019776.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
RE: Trade Count and Volumes for Feb 26, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-02-27T14:20:06Z
Justin, can we get the comma separator for the total qty column ? Looks good though. If we can do that I would like to put this into production for usual mailing list. -----Original Message----- From: Rostant, Justin Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:50 PM To: Zipper, Andy; Bridges, Michael Subject: Trade Count and Volumes for Feb 26, 2001 <Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
zipper-a/tradecounts/56.
<29203946.1075842019804.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Counts by Country, Commodity, Category for Feb 22, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-02-22T23:30:29Z
Andy, do you want me to send this out to my normal distribution list? Please advise Thanks jr
zipper-a/tradecounts/57.
<30051402.1075842019838.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Counts by Country, Commodity, Category for January 18, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-01-19T05:15:00Z
Pleas note that we have Natural Gas Financial Options as a new Category
zipper-a/tradecounts/58.
<4694120.1075842018420.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Count and Volumes for May 29, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-29T23:42:24Z
EnronOnline Trade Counts and Volume for May 29, 2001 EXTERNAL INTERNAL TOTAL COUNTRY COMMODITY CATEGORY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY UNIT OF MEASURE Austria Power Physical 11 10,144 - - 11 10,144 MWh Belgium Natural Gas Physical 14 935,000 - - 14 935,000 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Financial 23 12,369,500 18 3,687,500 41 16,057,000 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Financial Option 1 1,168,500 - - 1 1,168,500 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Physical 362 15,307,317 - - 362 15,307,317 MMBtu Canada Power Financial 4 10,782 2 72 6 10,854 MWh (Canada) France Power Physical 5 38,106 - - 5 38,106 MWh Germany Power Physical 73 728,627 - - 73 728,627 MWh Germany Power Physical Option - - 4 711,000 4 711,000 MWh Netherlands Power Physical 1 43,800 - - 1 43,800 MWh Norway Power Financial 12 192,240 - - 12 192,240 MWh Switzerland Power Physical 16 26,852 - - 16 26,852 MWh United Kingdom Crude Financial 17 1,550,000 - - 17 1,550,000 Barrel United Kingdom LPG Financial 1 2,000 - - 1 2,000 mt United Kingdom Metals Financial 528 6,860 78 725 606 7,585 LME Registered mt Lot United Kingdom Natural Gas Physical NBP 67 11,993,925 2 300,000 69 12,293,925 MMBtu United Kingdom Oil Products Financial 4 20,000 - - 4 20,000 IPE mt United Kingdom Petchems Financial 1 2,000 - - 1 2,000 mt United Kingdom Power Physical 13 846,720 - - 13 846,720 MWh USA Coal Physical - - 2 21 2 21 COAL-Tons/Barges/Mnth USA Crude Financial 282 13,005,000 81 3,420,000 363 16,425,000 Barrel USA Crude Financial Option 6 300,000 - - 6 300,000 Barrel USA Crude Physical 5 465,000 - - 5 465,000 Barrel USA Gas Pipeline Capacity Physical 3 24,200 - - 3 24,200 MMBtu USA LPG Financial 2 30,000 - - 2 30,000 Gallon USA LPG Physical 1 15,000 - - 1 15,000 Gallon USA Natural Gas Financial 1,356 523,112,570 727 392,267,337 2,083 915,379,907 MMBtu USA Natural Gas Financial Option 19 14,585,000 1 1,000,000 20 15,585,000 MMBTU USA Natural Gas Physical 1,910 72,809,002 30 724,197 1,940 73,533,199 MMBtu USA Oil Products Financial 26 1,135,000 4 60,000 30 1,195,000 Barrel USA Power Financial 58 1,102,436 6 33,257 64 1,135,692 MWh USA Power Physical 712 10,559,778 192 4,768,613 904 15,328,391 MWh USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 4 9,500,000 4 9,500,000 EUR/1 USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 5 1,545,000,000 5 1,545,000,000 FX USD USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 1 400,000 1 400,000 GBP/1 USA Weather Financial 4 12 - - 4 12 Cooling Degree Day Total 5,537 1,157 6,694
zipper-a/tradecounts/6.
<7605244.1075842018447.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Count and Volumes for May 25, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-26T00:40:00Z
EnronOnline Trade Counts and Volume for May 25, 2001 EXTERNAL INTERNAL TOTAL COUNTRY COMMODITY CATEGORY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY UNIT OF MEASURE Austria Power Physical 13 21,183 - - 13 21,183 MWh Belgium Natural Gas Physical 6 275,000 - - 6 275,000 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Financial 10 5,185,000 1 460,000 11 5,645,000 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Financial Option 1 441,750 - - 1 441,750 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Physical 228 12,921,411 - - 228 12,921,411 MMBtu Canada Power Financial 6 11,220 3 144 9 11,364 MWh (Canada) Denmark Power Financial - - 2 25,680 2 25,680 MWh France Power Physical 2 686 - - 2 686 MWh Germany Coal Physical 1 9 - - 1 9 SECA Contract - Metric Tonnes Germany Power Physical 44 107,720 - - 44 107,720 MWh Norway Power Financial 9 128,400 - - 9 128,400 MWh Singapore Crude Financial 1 50,000 - - 1 50,000 Barrel Switzerland Power Physical 20 4,956 - - 20 4,956 MWh United Kingdom Crude Financial 8 295,000 1 25,000 9 320,000 Barrel United Kingdom Metals Financial 389 3,475 64 - 453 3,475 LME Registered mt Lot United Kingdom Natural Gas Physical NBP 53 6,874,280 - - 53 6,874,280 MMBtu United Kingdom Natural Gas Physical NBP Option 1 920,000 - - 1 920,000 MMBtu United Kingdom Oil Products Financial 2 15,000 - - 2 15,000 Crack bl/m United Kingdom Oil Products Financial 9 43,611 - - 9 43,611 mt United Kingdom Power Physical 3 262,080 - - 3 262,080 MWh USA Crude Financial 214 10,245,000 48 2,255,000 262 12,500,000 Barrel per month USA Emissions Physical 1 - 1 - Emission allowance USA Gas Pipeline Capacity Physical 2 312,800 - - 2 312,800 MMBtu USA LPG Financial 3 60,000 - - 3 60,000 Gallon USA Natural Gas Financial 776 362,343,595 340 134,544,118 1,116 496,887,713 MMBtu USA Natural Gas Financial Option 24 22,900,000 11 10,280,000 35 33,180,000 MMBTU USA Natural Gas Physical 1,925 72,573,246 44 892,172 1,969 73,465,418 MMBtu USA Oil Products Financial 18 455,000 3 30,000 21 485,000 Barrel USA Power Financial 35 216,620 6 40,164 41 256,784 MWh USA Power Physical 583 7,799,151 94 2,704,082 677 10,503,233 MWh USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 2 2,750,000 2 2,750,000 EUR/1 USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 1 5,000,000 1 5,000,000 FX USD USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 1 300,000 1 300,000 GBP/1 USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 1 1,000,000 1 1,000,000 USD/1 USA Weather Financial 4 11 - - 4 11 Cooling Degree Day Total 4,391 622 5,013
zipper-a/tradecounts/7.
<12516822.1075842018473.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Count and Volumes for May 24, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-24T23:21:58Z
EnronOnline Trade Counts and Volume for May 24, 2001 EXTERNAL INTERNAL TOTAL COUNTRY COMMODITY CATEGORY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY UNIT OF MEASURE Belgium Natural Gas Physical 8 175,000 - - 8 175,000 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Financial 22 12,365,000 19 7,765,000 41 20,130,000 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Financial Option 3 2,574,500 - - 3 2,574,500 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Physical 221 8,495,162 1 300,000 222 8,795,162 MMBtu Canada Power Financial 11 10,707 1 1,234 12 11,941 MWh (Canada) Singapore Oil Products Financial 1 50,000 - - 1 50,000 Barrel United Kingdom Crude Financial 9 925,000 1 45,000 10 970,000 Barrel United Kingdom Metals Financial 542 15,100 43 25 585 15,125 LME Registered mt Lot United Kingdom Natural Gas Physical NBP 58 6,029,960 - - 58 6,029,960 MMBtu United Kingdom Oil Products Financial 2 30,000 - - 2 30,000 Crack bl/m United Kingdom Oil Products Financial 12 42,387 - - 12 42,387 mt United Kingdom Power Physical 9 715,680 - - 9 715,680 MWh USA Crude Financial 391 16,520,000 73 2,660,000 464 19,180,000 Barrel USA Gas Pipeline Capacity Physical 4 624,200 - - 4 624,200 MMBtu USA LPG Financial 4 115,000 - - 4 115,000 Gallon USA Natural Gas Financial 1,233 455,022,007 601 252,616,247 1,834 707,638,254 MMBtu USA Natural Gas Financial Option 18 17,300,000 8 8,000,000 26 25,300,000 MMBTU USA Natural Gas Physical 2,191 51,074,420 33 157,919 2,224 51,232,339 MMBtu USA Oil Products Financial 31 1,115,000 6 80,000 37 1,195,000 Barrel USA Paper Physical 1 1,000 - - 1 1,000 Metric Tons (+/- 5%) USA Petchems Financial 3 30,000 - - 3 30,000 Gallon USA Power Financial 75 228,723 12 71,546 87 300,269 MWh USA Power Physical 612 14,839,428 192 7,071,192 804 21,910,620 MWh USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 4 9,400,000 4 9,400,000 EUR/1 USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 2 6,000,000 2 6,000,000 FX USD USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 2 4,000,000 2 4,000,000 USD/1 USA Weather Financial 1 3 - - 1 3 Cooling Degree Day 5,462 998 6,460
zipper-a/tradecounts/8.
<17495870.1075842018500.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Count and Volumes for May 23, 2001
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-24T02:37:22Z
EnronOnline Trade Counts and Volume for May 23, 2001 EXTERNAL INTERNAL TOTAL COUNTRY COMMODITY CATEGORY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY COUNT QTY UNIT OF MEASURE Austria Power Physical 18 10,416 - - 18 10,416 MWh Belgium Natural Gas Physical 10 745,000 - - 10 745,000 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Financial 19 8,850,000 3 452,500 22 9,302,500 MMBtu Canada Natural Gas Physical 263 11,363,695 1 300,000 264 11,663,695 MMBtu Canada Power Financial 12 2,994 1 1,440 13 4,434 MWh (Canada) France Power Physical 3 1,096 - - 3 1,096 MWh Germany Power Physical 61 734,090 - - 61 734,090 MWh Norway Power Financial 34 683,040 - - 34 683,040 MWh Singapore Crude Financial 2 100,000 - - 2 100,000 Barrel Switzerland Power Physical 26 30,806 - - 26 30,806 MWh United Kingdom Crude Financial 14 1,080,000 2 90,000 16 1,170,000 Barrel United Kingdom LPG Financial 1 2,000 - - 1 2,000 mt United Kingdom Metals Financial 568 9,525 41 25 609 9,550 LME Registered mt Lot United Kingdom Natural Gas Physical NBP 132 18,631,740 6 574,280 138 19,206,020 MMBtu United Kingdom Natural Gas Physical NBP Option 2 1,840,000 - - 2 1,840,000 MMBtu United Kingdom Oil Products Financial 4 30,000 - - 4 30,000 Crack bl/m United Kingdom Oil Products Financial 18 90,000 - - 18 90,000 IPE mt United Kingdom Petchems Financial 1 1,000 - - 1 1,000 mt United Kingdom Power Physical 15 873,600 - - 15 873,600 MWh USA Crude Financial 281 9,860,000 99 2,980,000 380 12,840,000 Barrel USA Crude Financial Option 22 1,100,000 20 1,000,000 42 2,100,000 Barrel USA Crude Physical 1 93,000 - - 1 93,000 Barrel USA Gas Pipeline Capacity Physical 3 24,200 - - 3 24,200 MMBtu USA LPG Financial 1 30,000 - - 1 30,000 Gallon USA LPG Physical 3 75,000 - - 3 75,000 Gallon USA Lumber Physical 1 1 - - 1 1 Thousand Board Feet USA Natural Gas Financial 958 385,007,118 753 298,170,370 1,711 683,177,488 MMBTU USA Natural Gas Financial Option 34 33,320,000 13 13,000,000 47 46,320,000 MMBTU USA Natural Gas Physical 2,020 32,248,622 40 456,227 2,060 32,704,849 MMBTU USA Oil Products Financial 37 1,725,000 2 20,000 39 1,745,000 Barrel USA Power Financial 39 523,478 19 31,286 58 554,763 MWh USA Power Physical 639 10,896,596 149 3,202,778 788 14,099,373 MWh USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 2 4,300,000 2 4,300,000 EUR/1 USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 3 7,000,000 3 7,000,000 FX USD USA Rate and Currency Financial - - 2 2,430,000 2 2,430,000 USD/1 USA Weather Financial 7 21 - - 7 21 Cooling Degree Day Total 5,249 1,156 6,405
zipper-a/tradecounts/9.
<12606861.1075842019865.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: Licensing Agreement
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-06-19T20:12:03Z
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:42 PM To: Zipper, Andy; Bridges, Michael Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Licensing Agreement Andy & Mike - Attached are our revisions to the licensing agreement. Based on our business principle discussion, Peggy and I are comfortable that this round of edits represents our mutual business intent. In an effort to get this to you as quickly as possible, though, we are sending this on for your review in parallel with the review we are performing with Kenny. Additionally, we have specifically left out the treatment for streaming data to Enron affiliates as we wanted the opportunity to discuss your suggested language with you further. Lastly, we recognize that the structure and content surrounding the indemnities and limitation of liabilities cannot be truly finalized until the contractual business points are fully agreed to. Regards, Mark (See attached file: Redline.rtf)(See attached file: Enron License Agreement (VE Draft).DOC) - Redline.rtf - Enron License Agreement (VE Draft).DOC
zipper-a/tss/1.
<22926643.1075842020115.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
V&E Comments on TSH License Agreement, draft May 1, 2001
2001-05-20T23:29:43Z
Travis: Here are my general comments on the May 1st draft of the TSH License Agreement between Enron and Accenture. I have not tried to provide detailed drafting comments, but there are many, many problems with the draft. I have limited my comments to what I consider the bigger issues. Some of my comments may have already been addressed by Andy, but since I am starting fresh on this, I thought that I would just comment on everything. I look forward to talking with you further about this. 1. Which is the correct Enron entity? I assume that this should be an agreement with Enron Networks. Does Accenture expect a parent guaranty? Does Accenture expect a broader exclusivity that binds Enron Corp. and its affiliates? I assume that we want to limit the scope of the exclusivity to Enron Networks. 2. The description of EnronOnline is much too broad "various goods and raw materials". This needs to be limited to certain products. 3. I don't understand why Accenture is licensing aggregate data. I thought the service to be established was to provide re-formatted data to individual Enron customers. That would require only customer-specific data. 4. Will Enron be receive "real time" data transfers? Will this be true in the sense that it will be the same time as Enron transmits information to the customer? I assume that there may be a lag in time between the completion of a transaction and the transmission of the transaction data. 5. In Section 2.1(a), the scope of the "exclusive" license needs to be carefully thought through and narrowed as much as possible. What is "post-transaction data", and why does Accenture need/want an exclusive license on aggregate data? Also regarding the exclusive license, we need to consider all necessary exceptions to the exclusivity, such as Enron's internal use, transmission to the customer, etc. Also, all transmissions of customer-specific data require the customer's prior consent; the exclusivity should apply only if that consent is obtained by Accenture, and only for as long as that consent is valid. 6. One key aspect of an exclusive license is how it is terminated. Normally there are increasing minimum royalties associated with the licensee's continued exclusive rights. Often the licensee has the right not to pay the minimum royalties, in which case the license can convert to a non-exclusive or the license can terminate. 7. In Section 2.1(a), there is a reference to Accenture's right to sublicense. This right needs to be carefully narrowed and clearly stated. Can Accenture remarket the data to anyone other than the customer? 8. The term "Customer" is confusing. In Section 2.1(b), it would seem to relate only to EnronOnline customers, but later in that section it speaks of "its [Accenture's] customers. In the definition schedule, the term is not limited to EnronOnline's customers. 9. In Section 2.2, the same comments in points 5 apply to the exclusive license of the software. 10. There is a reference in Section 2.2 to "updates and revisions." Will Enron be responsible for these? What continuing services will Enron be obligated to offer for the software? Will Enron be entitled to receive and use any improvements or updates that Accenture may make to the software? 11. Should the scope of the license be limited geographically? Why is it worldwide? If it is worldwide, what happens if Accenture does not market in some countries? Is Enron excluded from using or licensing the data in those countries? 12. In Section 2.3, I assume that Enron will dictate the format of the data to be received, and that Enron may revised that format from time to time. 13. Section 2.3(a) has some language that says that Enron will provide... the interface between Accenture and Enron?... and "any other software developed by or on behalf of Enron necessary for Accenture to perform its obligations to its Customers? That is ridiculously broad. What obligations to Accenture's customers? I can't imagine that Enron would give Accenture additional software for "free", especially if Enron spent considerable amounts developing it. Additional software may require additional license fees, etc. 14. The concept of service levels and service level credits (in Section 2.3) is typical in service agreements. I wonder what Accenture has in mind. They certainly resist any meaningful service levels or credits when they are providing service. 15. Section 2.4 is truly amazing. It is so broad that Accenture could argue that anything Enron does adversely affects Accenture and that Enron has to pay Accenture... If Enron is willing to provide Accenture with a non-compete in addition to the exclusive license, then these provisions need to be harmonized and carefully limited. Perhaps Accenture thought that this provision was for the benefit of Enron, in that it enables Enron to complete potentially competitive transactions without violating the exclusivity license (although in my view the language of the license doesn't really reach this point). We need to discuss the business points that Accenture is trying to address in this section and start again with the drafting. 16. Section 2.5 is yet another twist on exclusivity. This also needs to be tied into the scope of the exclusivity provisions. If an Enron Customer hates Accenture and refuses to do business with them, then what happens? Can Enron provide the service to that customer? If so, what is the effect of the exclusive right in Section 2.5? 17. Section 2.5 also contains a reference to "co-branding marketing" activities, and requires Enron to support and assist Accenture. This is much too broad. Enron may or may not wish to engage in "co-branding marketing" activities, and if so they need to be narrowly defined at the time. 18. The exception in Section 2.5 to Enron's provision of the data services is very troubling, as it would appear that Accenture is trying to limit Enron's discretion in establishing its own pricing. If Accenture really wants this type of protection, we need to review it with antitrust counsel. 19. The payment terms seem extraordinarily generous for Accenture. It would be highly unusual in my experience to have license fees paid only once per year. 20. Not that I would know, but the minimum payments seem very low to me. The minimum payments is the best way to establish whether Accenture has met its obligations to market, etc., so that it can keep its exclusive rights. I would think that the minimum fees would be significantly higher. They could be indexed to the number of transactions, customers or transaction value of EnronOnline, so that if EnronOnline grew faster than expected, Accenture would have to keep pace or loose its exclusivity. 21. The use of "Gross TSH Revenues" as part of the formula for royalties is typical, but it presents a very significant challenge because Accenture will have other relationships with its customers and may under price this service (e.g., as a loss leader), and try to make their money on consulting services. It would be better for Enron if we could come up with a transaction fee, that Accenture would have to pay Enron for each transaction/transmission of data to a customer (indexed appropriately), and then let Accenture worry about how it makes money. 22. We need to consider the tax issues further. I think that the fees paid to Enron for data transmission/resale and for the software may be subject to state sales tax. Accenture should be responsible for at least the taxes related to the data transmission/resale. If it is reselling these services to its customers, it can provide Enron with a resale exemption certificate. The license of software is probably not subject to the same exemption and may be taxable in any event. That would require us to split the revenue stream between the two types of services (data and software), or run the risk that the whole stream is taxable regardless of the resale certificate. We need to consider these issues further with tax counsel. 23. [I'll skip commenting on the IP provisions of Article IV for now. Suffice it to say that they need work. But we need to work out the business deal before worrying too much about these provisions. But they will be critical to our agreement with Accenture.] 24. The Term is another amazing provision. First, five years is a very long time in my view to have an exclusive license for this type of new/evolving business. Second, Accenture's proposal for a unilateral option to extend it for five more years is a bold move. But it seems ridiculous to me that the minimum annual payments for those additional years (of exclusive rights, I assume), would be fixed at $1 million. Surely they jest. 25. Enron needs a way to terminate this license early, either through a buy-out right or a termination for convenience with a payment. Also, if Accenture is violating the terms of the license or otherwise violating "material" terms of this Agreement (which we may have to identify), Enron should have the right to terminate. I have often used the approach that the licensor should not be permitted to terminate except in the event of a payment default, but we should seek much more. Especially if Enron only gets paid once a year. 26. I noticed that Accenture did not offer any representations. Some would be appropriate. 27. The liability/indemnity section is interesting in that it lacks any indemnity by Accenture to Enron's benefit. I would think that Accenture would indemnify Enron for all claims by customers relating to Accenture's service (e.g., mapping errors, translation errors, etc.), except if directly related to Enron's error. We need to discuss this risk model. We have to assume that EnronOnline's customers would come after both Accenture and EnronOnline, and we need to consider how these claims should be handled. 28. The limits of liability are interesting. I wonder what the story is behind the $25 million limit for us, and the $5 million limit for them. 29. We would not accept the exclusions to the consequential damages as drafted; and we would want to exclude claims related to Accenture's breach of Enron's IP rights from any consequential damage limitation. [That will get their attention.] 30. The "worldwide license" provisions of Section 9.1 require some discussion. I doubt that Enron intends to get consents for and make all filings in countries where Accenture wants to sell these services. See you on Monday at 9:30am. Feel free to call me earlier on Monday or at home tonight (713 661-3279). Ted Stockbridge Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (713) 758-1032
zipper-a/tss/10.
<22546424.1075842020139.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Draft contract
2001-05-17T21:23:26Z
Andy and Mike - Here is the second version of the draft contract. You will see that the legal language reflects the proposed term sheet that we turned over on Monday. After Mike debriefed with me and Kenny yesterday, we feel that further business clarification is needed before we can translate this into legal language. Thanks, Peggy (See attached file: EOL Contract Draft v2.doc) - EOL Contract Draft v2.doc
zipper-a/tss/11.
<7554858.1075842020163.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Restrictions on Enron posting EnronOnline prices
2001-05-14T17:37:55Z
Andy - Here are our thoughts back on the posting of EOL pricing data. Thanks and please call with questions, etc., Peggy (See attached file: Restriction on STP v2.doc) - Restriction on STP v2.doc
zipper-a/tss/12.
<4543008.1075842020187.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: Term Sheet
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-04T21:44:31Z
Get a load of this...I think we should pull all the Valtech cards. -----Original Message----- From: Martin Santora <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Martin+20Santora+20+3Cmartin+2Esantora+40valtech+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 4:11 PM To: Bridges, Michael Subject: Term Sheet - Enron Term Sheet.doc
zipper-a/tss/13.
<18010569.1075842020211.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: Accenture/EnronOnline License Agreement
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-01T20:03:40Z
Revised draft. I will forward to Travis as well. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-peggy+2Ea+2Ekostial+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:44 PM To: Bridges, Michael Subject: Accenture/EnronOnline License Agreement See you all at 4. PK (See attached file: 96S903_.doc) - 96S903_.doc
zipper-a/tss/14.
<9116170.1075842020235.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: Accenture Client Materials
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-01T13:13:02Z
Two Verbal Confirms. They decided they could send me their marketing materials. Mike Bridges -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-peggy+2Ea+2Ekostial+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:48 AM To: Bridges, Michael Cc: [email protected] Subject: Client Materials Mike - Attached are our latest decks.....the service overview deck and then the beginnings of the technical discussion deck.....they are coming along nicely. Also, on Cinergy and Conoco, I would consider those verbal commits. They indicated strong enough interest, however, that we are engaging in trying to get the commit via an LOI. Joe, your spreadsheet needs to accurately reflect the status of each of these clients so that we are not misrepresenting anything. Thanks, Peggy (See attached file: The Hub.pdf)(See attached file: Main Technical Deck.ppt) - The Hub.pdf - Main Technical Deck.ppt
zipper-a/tss/15.
<5936951.1075842020260.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-04-23T01:25:55Z
Sorry for the delay......this has gotten kicked back several times now.......Hopefully, this one will go through. PK ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Andy and Dave - Attached below is the working deal sheet with Enron and Accenture's most recent iterations and comments. If you all could review our feedback and let us know your thoughts, that would be great. Also, Dave, please let me know if you want to move forward with the counsel discussion on Monday. Informally and respectfully, I would like to comment on Enron's sentiment that we have had six weeks to think about some of these things and as a result, the ambiguity should already be gone. I appreciate this point-of-view, but also want to share my perspective with you all: This is a nonstandard deal in terms of the traditional 'buyer seeks seller with needed asset'. This traditional approach likely has the buyer in the market for that asset already. All of the analysis to determine the value of that asset has most likely been completed. As a result, the buyer probably has a strong sense of the value of that asset to their business and is ready to pull the trigger if the price is right. Since Enron approached us with the service concept and the asset to be sold, this typical preexisting condition was not present. This is a big investment. It is not just the $5M, but an additional $15M in marketing, selling, designing, building, maintaining, and operating costs. Further, any delta between the $5M and the 30% TSH take due to Enron is additional investment for Accenture. So, we are really evaluating a $20+M investment, not a $5M investment. There is not good historical evidence that transaction based businesses, on a stand alone basis, are sustainable over any long term horizon (just look at the dot.bomb bust). Pricing determination for a transaction based business is difficult and highly volatile. Our market review has proven this yet again. I highlight these dynamics to explain, not excuse, our need to approach things the way that we have. That being said, I will reiterate that we would not even be performing this analysis (itself costly) if we did not have the highest regards for Enron, our collective ability to do well in the marketplace together, and a general bullishness for the value of this offering. I look forward to hearing from you all on Monday. Thanks, Peggy (See attached file: Enron - Accenture - Dealpoints v4.doc) ----- Forwarded by Peggy A. Kostial on 04/22/2001 11:37 AM ----- "Zipper, Andy" To: Peggy A. Kostial@Accenture, Kenny W. Baldwin@Accenture <Andy.Zipper@ cc: "Samuels, Dave" <[email protected]>, "Bridges, Michael" enron.com> <[email protected]> Subject: TSH proposal 04/19/2001 12:34 PM Kenny and Peggy, I have the following comments on the proposed deal sheet dated 4/17/01: -The keep whole commitment must be developed, but we are okay with the concept of contributing the revenue of any direct distribute deals minus our costs to the TSH. -We will provide Accenture with as much information as is commercially reasonable that describes the nature of the EnronOnline deal flow as it is occurring, for the purpose of aiding in marketing of the service. We cannot send the entire transaction stream containing non-subscribing entities for obvious privacy reasons. -The EnronOnline technology asset piece I have revised as follows: o EnronOnline technology asset is a part of the deal * EnronOnline retains Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) to 'Transaction Data Feed' software * Enron grants Accenture a fully paid-up, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual, worldwide, non-assignable license to 'Smart Client' software. Accenture is free to develop the 'Smart Client' code and reuse it for any purpose related to the operation of an Energy Transaction Support Hub, but Enron retains IPR to all code provided by Enron within the context of this arrangement. * EnronOnline provides interface descriptions, design documentation and the actual code for the 'Smart Client' software. I think this gets us to where we all need to be. -The "Validate we are not off base..." dependency is irrelevant. Accenture has had six weeks to validate that. The 3 customer hurdle presumably does that. Our firm understanding of Accenture's position, stated by Kenny, is that if Accenture gets 3 customers to verbally commit, then we are done. We would strongly prefer that Accenture scrap the 3 customer litmus test, and move forward with the transaction based on the recognized value of the offering and the many other value factors for Accenture that have been previously discussed. Having said all this, we are friendly to the whole idea if it actually gets to the stage where it is a firm proposal. Regards, Andy Zipper (See attached file: Enron - Accenture - Dealpoints v4.doc) - Enron - Accenture - Dealpoints v4.doc
zipper-a/tss/16.
<25010743.1075842020285.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
EOL-Accenture Deal Sheet
2001-04-10T11:35:05Z
Dave - Attached are our comments and suggested changes. Please call to review. On the time line for completion, we have four critical steps to complete: Finalize market analysis to refine business case, specifically projected revenue stream Complete counterparty surveying, including targeting 3 CPs for letters of intent Review Enron asset base for potential reuse/ licensing Contract negotiations Joe will come back to us with an updated time line, but it is my expectation that we are still on the same schedule (we just begun week three) with possibly a week or so slippage.....contract negotiations will probably be the critical path. We will send our cut at the actual time line here shortly. Thanks, Peggy (See attached file: accenture-dealpoints v2.doc) - accenture-dealpoints v2.doc
zipper-a/tss/17.
<19189971.1075842020311.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Data Redistribution Proposal
2001-03-20T19:22:37Z
Andy, Further to the conference call with Jon and Eric please find the very overdue proposal for data redistribution attached. Please accept our apologies for the delay in getting this document out to you. I will be in Houston until Thursday, if possible I would like to take this opportunity to meet with you to introduce myself and go through the document. I can also provide a hard copy of the referenced document "Information For EnronOnLine". I can be reached by return email, cell (312 286 1808) or our Houston office (713 523 6028). I look forward to hearing from you and hopefully meeting you later this week. Best regards Emma Vine VP - Strategic Alliances GlobalView Software Inc. Tel: + 1 312 786 0110 Fax: + 1 312 939 8289 Cell: +1 312 286 1808 Email: [email protected] www.gvsi.com - EOL Data Redist Proposal.doc
zipper-a/tss/18.
<642363.1075842020335.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
EOL Presentation
2001-03-19T21:35:55Z
Andy, Dave, and Mike - Appreciate the time this morning. I hope you all found it as productive as we did. Attached is the "scrubbed" version of the deck we reviewed this morning. A couple of key points: The dates are notional.. We hope to spend some time with you in the short term validating them. As Kenny mentioned today, we will need to perform a third workstream called 'Accenture Socialization and Buy-in' during the initial 6 week period. This is in addition to the 'Market Analysis' workstream and 'Target 5 Counterparties for Sign-up' workstream that we discussed earlier. Most of the business case and financial information has been removed with the exception of the projected base case revenue stream for Enron. Although we removed this information from this document, we wanted to make sure that you know that we consider this to be the basis for our analysis to date and that it is available for all future discussions and worksessions that we have. Again, thanks for this morning and we look forward to hearing from you all soon. Peggy (See attached file: EnronOnline Master 010319.ppt) - EnronOnline Master 010319.ppt
zipper-a/tss/19.
<20841357.1075842019889.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Licensing Agreement
2001-06-19T19:42:29Z
Andy & Mike - Attached are our revisions to the licensing agreement. Based on our business principle discussion, Peggy and I are comfortable that this round of edits represents our mutual business intent. In an effort to get this to you as quickly as possible, though, we are sending this on for your review in parallel with the review we are performing with Kenny. Additionally, we have specifically left out the treatment for streaming data to Enron affiliates as we wanted the opportunity to discuss your suggested language with you further. Lastly, we recognize that the structure and content surrounding the indemnities and limitation of liabilities cannot be truly finalized until the contractual business points are fully agreed to. Regards, Mark (See attached file: Redline.rtf)(See attached file: Enron License Agreement (VE Draft).DOC) - Redline.rtf - Enron License Agreement (VE Draft).DOC
zipper-a/tss/2.
<25225425.1075842020359.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Trade Data Feed valuation
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-03-08T22:27:39Z
Here is an initial stab both a conservative and a pitch valuation of the opportunity. I view the assumptions in the conservative model as our worst case scenario, and, the assumptions in our pitch scenario as sellable to a counterparty but, optimistic. Feedback on the assumptions is welcome. Marc Eichmann
zipper-a/tss/20.
<3475367.1075842020382.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Meeting follow-up
[ "" ]
2001-03-06T20:01:44Z
<<EDSCube_NY_Feb2.ppt>> Greg, Enclosed is the presentation that Jean-Louis presented yesterday. EDS is very interested in the opportunities that were discussed. A suggestion for a go-forward strategy would be to have a team of EDS experts sit with Enron Net Works to map the development of the Transaction Hub. EDS would provide individuals with both capital markets (with experience setting up transaction utilities) and energy experience to identify an initial business plan to build and bring the Hub to market. The outcome will be a fifty-thousand foot strategy that can then be driven down to operationalizing the Hub. EDS is also determining how EOL can be leveraged through our current relationships with more discussion to follow. Please let me know your review of the meeting and if we are in sync going forward. Thanks again for traveling to EDS and offerring the opportunity to work with ENW in this venture. Cheers, Jim Please Jim Kolodgie CE Enron Information Solutions SW Bus. 713 853-1635 Cel. 832 656-6777 [email protected] - EDSCube_NY_Feb2.ppt
zipper-a/tss/21.
<25785192.1075842020406.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Proposal
2001-02-23T23:32:44Z
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 05:29 PM --------------------------- "Andrew Bruce" <[email protected]> on 02/23/2001 04:56:00 PM To: [email protected] cc: [email protected] Subject: Proposal Bob As requested here is the proposal to you in writing. Thank you for your consideration Regards Andrew - TradeWell Proposal.doc
zipper-a/tss/22.
<16244945.1075842020430.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: Response to the TSS Opportunity
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-02-23T19:40:32Z
Andy, Dave Looks like these guys get the big picture and should be a possible buyer in our partnership structure. Harry -----Original Message----- From: <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3Cphilip+2Egreedy+40us+2Epwcglobal+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 10:38 AM To: Arora, Harry; Samuels, Dave Cc: [email protected] Subject: Response to the TSS Opportunity Harry and Dave, I have attached a letter for you as a response to the TSS opportunity we discussed last week. Please view this letter as an opportunity to have further discussions. (See attached file: Letter for TSS.doc) Thanks Phil Greedy ---------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. - Letter for TSS.doc
zipper-a/tss/23.
<5983168.1075842019912.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Accenture Deal Points
2001-06-14T17:50:16Z
Attached is the document that will serve as the basis for our discussion tomorrow. The document summarizes key business principles, our understanding of the business principle agreement for each point, and our interpretation of the current version of the contract for each point. There are several other points that I did not include in this document as we feel they are contractual negotiation points versus deal principle points. Our goal is to gain clarity on these high level points tomorrow, to get these back to Brian for contract redlining and turnaround by Saturday, and then to reconvene for a detailed contract review session on Monday. Also, as we would like to focus on these key principles, we are planning to have myself, Kenny, and Mark present for the meeting. Brian will be on call in case we need him. Thanks and we look forward to our visit tomorrow at 1 p.m. Peggy (See attached file: EOL Contract Draft v3 Deal Points.doc) - EOL Contract Draft v3 Deal Points.doc
zipper-a/tss/3.
<30041844.1075842019937.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Licensing Agreement
2001-06-04T17:23:13Z
At the request of Travis McCullough, I am forwarding to you a cover memo prepared by Travis, together with the revised draft Licensing Agreement. Thanks. - Accenture1.doc - June 4 License Agreement with Accenture [by V&E].DOC
zipper-a/tss/4.
<19746906.1075842019984.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
2001-06-03T15:12:10Z
Attached for your review is a revised draft of the Licensing Agreement with Accenture. Ted has reviewed the draft and his comments are reflected. We look forward to finalizing and making the distribution to Accenture on Monday. Following are some thoughts for your consideration: 1. Definition of Enron Platform. Andy's definition of "Enron Platform" excluded products substantially dissimilar to those listed on the platform, to which we added the qualification of listed on the platform as of the Effective Date. Is this correct? In addition, is there a possibility that Enron might split up the platform (i.e., by product type), and then sell off certain segments? If so, we may need to further modify the definition. 2. License Grants. Though the license grant with respect to Customer-Specific Transaction Data in Section 3.1 is limited to Accenture's right to re-format the data, we advise adding some restrictions to specifically negate their right to manipulate the data in certain ways, as per your previous business discussions. In addition, with respect to the SmartClient Software license in Section 3.3, Accenture will be permitted to freely modify the software for their own purposes, except to the extent the software is being used for receiving data through the Enron Data Feed. We need to confirm that the appropriate restrictions have been imposed. 3. Minimum Annual Payments. Section 5.1(b) provides that the Minimum Annual Payment is due at the end of each Contract Year. Is this satisfactory from the accounting perspective, or do we want more flexibility for purposes of booking these payments? 4. Audit Rights. In Section 5.4(b), we have added a limited right to do an operational audit, i.e., the audit can be initiated only on claim of breach, and can be performed only by a third party. We would like to discuss expanding this right. 5. Acceleration Rights on Termination. Section 7.6(b) permits us to accelerate the Minimum Annual Payments on Accenture's default for breach of contract. Is this the appropriate trigger? 6. Accenture Warranties. Should we add any warranties to Section 8.2? 7. Accenture Indemnity. We have expanded Accenture's indemnity obligation in Section 9.2(a), to cover any claims arising out the TSH Services or their modifications to the SmartClient Software. The only exception we have permitted is for data errors verified as Enron errors. 8. "Readable" Data. We have used the term "readable" in referring to the data in various places in the Agreement, including Section 4.1(a)(ii). In using this term, we intend to differentiate between the static data received by an Enron Customer, and the data to be received, "read" and then re-formatted by Accenture. We may need to select a more precise term with Jay's assistance. - June 3 License Agreement with Accenture [by V&E].DOC
zipper-a/tss/5.
<32933098.1075842020012.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Licensing Agreement
2001-05-29T00:14:22Z
Attached for your review is a revised draft of the Licensing Agreement between Accenture and Enron Net Works. Following is a list of some of the key issues raised by the draft. In addition, we have inserted various questions and comments into the draft in bold type. I look forward to resolving these questions with you and providing an updated draft over the next few days. I plan to speak with Jay Webb to resolve some of the technical issues as soon as possible. Thanks, and please feel free to contact me at 713-758-2109. Key Issues: 1. Qualification of Customers. In Section 2.3, we have adopted the construct (same as in Kiodex) that Enron must receive a Consent and Release from the relevant customer as a condition precedent to releasing that customer's transaction data. This will help manage Enron's liability. 2. Data Storage. Section 2.4 relates to Accenture's obligation to store transaction data. Should Accenture be obligated to purge the data after a period of time, or may it keep the data indefinitely? Should the data be purged at the end of the Agreement? 3. Service Levels. We have retained the reference to Service Levels in Section 2.5, but have deleted the concept of a Service Credit (i.e., amounts owed by Enron to Accenture for failure to achieve Service Levels). 4. License Rights/Exclusivity. Article III provides non-exclusive license rights to Accenture to use the Customer-Specific Transaction Data and SmartClient Software, for a narrow field of use. This is followed by Section 4.1, which sets forth certain Enron covenants regarding exclusivity. We prefer this construct due to the numerous exceptions to the exclusivity. For example, Enron's right to market to customers that do not want to sign up with Accenture is set forth as an exception to the exclusivity covenant in Section 4.1(a)(i). As originally drafted by Accenture, this provision had the effect of increasing the "TSH Gross Revenues," and thereby offsetting any minimum royalty obligations of Accenture. We redrafted this provision to simply obligate Enron to remit 70% of the net revenues it raises from non-Qualified Customers, and exclude that amount from TSH Revenues. That way, if Accenture never gets going, it would have to pay the full minimum royalty, without reduction for sales by Enron. 5. Marketing. Section 4.2 sets forth Accenture's obligation to use commercially reasonable efforts to market the TSH Services to Enron Customers. What standards does Enron want to impose regarding Accenture's use of Enron's name? Enron should not agree to let Accenture use the EOL trademark except under the agreement and procedures established by Enron from time to time. 6. Strategic Transactions. Section 4.5(a) sets forth a three-month blackout on transactions with multilateral trading platforms, relating to the transmission of transaction data; has this been agreed? With respect to Section 4.5(b), we are concerned about the confusion that may occur if Enron has an obligation to seek restrictions on another trading platform's use of transaction data. Enron's ability to proceed with any transaction will be substantially hampered if it needs to be able to prove to Accenture that it is using commercially reasonable efforts in the context of a negotiation; this is very difficult to prove. Our recommendation is a more straightforward approach, focusing on economic alternatives. 7. Transaction Fees. In Section 5.1, we have introduced the concept of a "Standard Transaction Fee," being a mutually agreed posted fee that will serve as the minimum amount payable to Enron in respect of TSH Services. The purpose is to address our concern that Accenture may price its services very low in order to attract high consulting fees, thereby resulting in low Gross TSH Revenue. We need to discuss how to calculate and apply the Standard Transaction Fee. In addition, we should discuss the definition of Gross TSH Revenues - the additions made to that definition in Accenture's May 16 draft were far too broad, and would exclude platforms like HoustonStreet, and even platforms which agreed contractually not to distribute the data. 8. Term/Termination. Section 7.1 provides for a five year term, commencing on the Enron Data Feed Launch Date. Accenture had provided that it start when Accenture began to offer TSH Services, which could be indefinitely in the future. We have added Enron termination rights to Section 7.2, and provided for an acceleration of all Minimum Annual Payments as liquidated damages if Enron terminates for an Accenture breach (Section 7.6(b)). 9. Accenture Operations Failure. We have added several features to guard against operational failure by Accenture's TSH Services. These include termination rights on operational failure (see definition of "Accenture Operational Failure") and indemnities. One additional safeguard may be to add rights for operational audits. We need to assess these provisions and determine if they are sufficient. 10. Successors. How should be address EOL's successors? Do we need to come up with a way to exclude new industries and products that may be offered in the future on Enron's Website. <<560569_2.DOC>> ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++ The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You - 560569_2.DOC
zipper-a/tss/6.
<26227755.1075842020037.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
RE: Accenture Agreement
2001-05-28T04:02:04Z
Sorry for the delay in responding. I needed the quiet time during the weekend to think through all of the changes and get the draft in order. Rasmani is going to go through the revised draft on Monday and will send it out later on Monday. She will be available to meet with you during the week. I will be out of town and generally unavailable, but I would be happy to set up a call if that would help. I made many, many changes to the Accenture draft. The more I listened and learned about the deal, the more I felt that the Accenture draft was just the wrong starting point. I have tried to incorporate many of the approaches that we have used in earlier EOL deals, but there my draft will require extensive review and perhaps revision before it is ready to share with Accenture. As we go through the new draft, we should probably start a dialogue with Accenture and its attorney to prepare it for some rather fundamental changes (like, instead of an "exclusive" license, I have added an exclusivity provision that sets forth exactly what Enron agrees not to do...). Please feel free to call Rasmani at 713 758-2109 to coordinate while I am out of the office. Ted Stockbridge Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (713) 758-1032 -----Original Message----- From: Bridges, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 9:10 AM To: McCullough, Travis Cc: [email protected] Subject: Accenture Agreement Can you please update me on the status of the Accidenture Agreement. Thank you. ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++ The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You
zipper-a/tss/7.
<5320800.1075842020062.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Transaction Support Hub
2001-05-24T17:45:04Z
Resending......I think I screwed up the first go round. PK ----- Forwarded by Peggy A. Kostial on 05/24/2001 01:49 PM ----- Peggy A. Kostial To: "Bridges, Michael" <[email protected]> cc: "Zipper, Andy" <Andy.Zipper, Kenny W. [email protected],> 05/24/2001 Subject: Transaction Support Hub(Document link: Peggy A. Kostial) 12:16 PM Thanks for the note below. Curious how you all are coming and what our expectations should be on turnaround. I am a bit concerned that Travis and his team are making changes based on 'the changes that we have all discussed over the last two weeks'. I am not totally confident that we reached agreement on each of the discussion points. But, we will obviously review your suggested changes and come back with feedback. As a restatement that may be obvious, however, the essence that the transaction stream is exclusive with the only exception being price posting agreements (and only then if you all choose to break the exclusivity) is fundamental to our valuation of the deal and our ability to ultimately sell this internally. So, please let me and Mike know asap when the document has been turned around. Thanks, Peggy "Bridges, Michael" To: Peggy A. Kostial@Accenture, Michael J. Urtso@Accenture, Kenny W. <Michael.Bridges@ Baldwin@Accenture enron.com> cc: "Zipper, Andy" <[email protected]>, "McCullough, Travis" <[email protected]> 05/23/2001 12:18 Subject: Transaction Support Hub PM I want to update you on the status to the Transaction Support Hub Agreement. Travis McCullough and his team will be making the changes that we have all discussed over the past two weeks. As well, we will also suggest, via the revision, some structural changes to the contract. More importantly, any change that we make will have an explanation. The explanation will serve to show intent and why specific changes were made. We have all dedicated huge amounts of time to this project already, now we want to spend a little extra time putting the right language around all of our conversations. I will update you on the progress of this effort tomorrow. As soon as the document is ready, I will get it to you. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mike Bridges
zipper-a/tss/8.
<4128038.1075842020086.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-05-24T17:38:04Z
Thanks for the note below. Curious how you all are coming and what our expectations should be on turnaround. I am a bit concerned that Travis and his team are making changes based on 'the changes that we have all discussed over the last two weeks'. I am not totally confident that we reached agreement on each of the discussion points. But, we will obviously review your suggested changes and come back with feedback. As a restatement that may be obvious, however, the essence that the transaction stream is exclusive with the only exception being price posting agreements (and only then if you all choose to break the exclusivity) is fundamental to our valuation of the deal and our ability to ultimately sell this internally. So, please let me and Mike know asap when the document has been turned around. Thanks, Peggy "Bridges, Michael" To: Peggy A. Kostial@Accenture, Michael J. Urtso@Accenture, Kenny W. <Michael.Bridges@ Baldwin@Accenture enron.com> cc: "Zipper, Andy" <[email protected]>, "McCullough, Travis" <[email protected]> 05/23/2001 12:18 Subject: Transaction Support Hub PM I want to update you on the status to the Transaction Support Hub Agreement. Travis McCullough and his team will be making the changes that we have all discussed over the past two weeks. As well, we will also suggest, via the revision, some structural changes to the contract. More importantly, any change that we make will have an explanation. The explanation will serve to show intent and why specific changes were made. We have all dedicated huge amounts of time to this project already, now we want to spend a little extra time putting the right language around all of our conversations. I will update you on the progress of this effort tomorrow. As soon as the document is ready, I will get it to you. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mike Bridges
zipper-a/tss/9.
<1812944.1075857796215.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
new email address
2000-09-09T22:01:00Z
[email protected] [email protected] null & void as of sept13th. later smith:)
zufferli-j/all_documents/1.
<2735282.1075857796237.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
momentum motor cars
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2000-05-04T18:10:00Z
John, Thank you for your interest in one of my cars. I look forward to meeting you on Saturday afternoon. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions. (713)875-7065 direct Sincerely, Kenneth Wright Pre-Owned Internet Sales Manager (713) 596-3891 - PV4250.F.jpg - PV4250.LREAR.jpg - PV4250.SEATS.jpg - PV4250.DIALS.jpg
zufferli-j/all_documents/2.
<28390332.1075842024763.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T17:43:01Z
Conference call with UBS
zufferli-j/calendar/1.
<12295247.1075842024786.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Updated: NETCO - Currency Issues
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-10T22:25:02Z
Issues to discuss: 1) Having NETCO's functional currency as US$ 2) Treasury role in NETCO Kathy
zufferli-j/calendar/2.
<18025482.1075842024808.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Duke/Westcoast Transaction
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-11-05T18:49:19Z
Dial In number: 216-0900 Passcode: 5879# Chair: Rob Hemstock Also participating will be Ron Deyholos and George Vegh of Donahue Ernst & Young.
zufferli-j/calendar/3.
<24868483.1075842024831.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Duke/Westcoast Transaction
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-10-31T18:20:31Z
SENT ON BEHALF OF PETER KEOHANE: Also participating will be Ron Deyholos and George Vegh of Donahue Ernst & Young.
zufferli-j/calendar/4.
<10596074.1075842024854.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Updated: EDCC/ECC Pricing Discussion
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-10-02T17:16:42Z
Would like to grab an hour to discuss different go-forward EDCC/ECC pricing scenarios.
zufferli-j/calendar/5.
<14846489.1075842024878.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
AES Project / Tolling Interest
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-08-24T22:50:21Z
Mtg with Derek Denniston at AES re: the project and tolling interest
zufferli-j/calendar/6.
<14200668.1075842024901.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Transfer of Enron Direct Contracts to ED & Marking of Income
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-07-26T18:08:53Z
Would you all be available to resolve how we are going to treat the old ED contracts? We need to address this prior to month end. Thanks Kate
zufferli-j/calendar/7.
<29945908.1075842020454.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-06T19:38:22Z
Sorry I missed call. My understanding is that it went well. Let me know if you need anything Frank
zufferli-j/deleted_items/1.
<15820560.1075842020808.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: Distributed Energy Investment Challenge--Expectations Meet New Realities - CERA Private Report
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-06T15:07:59Z
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected]@ENRON Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Distributed Energy Investment Challenge--Expectations Meet New Realities - CERA Private Report Title: Energy Technology Investing: The Bubble Bursts URL(s): http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2978; *********************************************************************** DISTRIBUTED ENERGY INVESTMENT CHALLENGE--EXPECTATIONS MEET NEW REALITIES Between 1998 and 2001, investors poured some US$4.36 billion into companies developing distributed energy (DE) technologies. This investment boom and the subsequent capital market correction were created by overly optimistic expectations regarding the size of the opportunity and speed of the market's development. * DE's failure to capture a substantial portion of the California market during the power crisis in early 2001 and the collapse of the telecommunications and information technology sectors undermined investors' confidence. Shifting power market fundamentals and growing uncertainty over the pace and direction of regulatory change also contributed. * Although the short-term market for DE technologies has suffered, in the long run the revised expectations are part of a healthy trend toward greater maturity among companies and their backers. * Restricted access to capital will slow commercialization of new technologies and drive consolidation among energy technology companies. Public policy will become an increasingly important source of funds and other support in the future. **end** Follow above URL for complete Private Report (16 printed pages). E-mail Category: Private Report CERA Knowledge Area(s): Distributed Energy ***************************************************************************************** CERAWeek2002 - February 11-15, 2002 - 21st Annual Executive Conference and Related Events REGISTER ONLINE TODAY AT: http://www.cera.com/ceraweek ** Two- and Four-day Passes Available ** Special Enrollment Programs ** Partnership Opportunities ** CERAWeek Online Premium Access ***************************************************************************************** To make changes to your cera.com profile go to: http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount Forgot your username and password? Go to: http://www.cera.com/client/forgot This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos Questions/Comments: [email protected] Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates
zufferli-j/deleted_items/10.
<16289905.1075842024009.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: Market Data Applications
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T21:16:09Z
John: I have not found anyone who was trying to renew these contracts. I am meeting with IHS on Thursday so I will make sure we add Accumap. How many user of Accumap will you need? I will forward the cost to you prior to sending the contracts to UBS. Do you know who managed the contracts with NOVA, Power Pool of Alberta, OASIS or ESBI so that I can gather contact information and begin the contract management of these applications. Thanks, Danielle -----Original Message----- From: Gaskill, Chris Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:57 AM To: Marcinkowski, Danielle Subject: RE: Market Data Applications I have no knowledge of anyone looking into the resources listed. Chris -----Original Message----- From: Marcinkowski, Danielle Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:25 AM To: Gaskill, Chris; Will, Lloyd Subject: FW: Market Data Applications Chris / Lloyd: To answer John's question do you know if anyone is looking into NOVA, Power Pool of Alberta, OASIS, or ESBI ? Thanks, Danielle -----Original Message----- From: Zufferli, John Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:21 AM To: Marcinkowski, Danielle Subject: RE: Market Data Applications Danielle, in general we need everything that Houston gets in addition to the info that is listed as Calgary on your spreadsheet. One information source in not listed on your sheet. IHS Accumap Priority 2 Contact: Carmen (403) 770-4503 phone, (403) 874-4218 cell Can you tell me if anyone in Houston is working on setting up accounts with NOVA, Power Pool of Alberta, OASIS, ESBI? These are gas and power related entities that we have to have accounts with the schedule physical gas and electricity. -----Original Message----- From: Marcinkowski, Danielle Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:59 PM To: Zufferli, John Subject: Market Data Applications John: Here are the contracts we are currently creating with UBS. Please verify that we have not missed any applications/publications or subscriptions. Highlight in Red the systems you will need and mark the priority from 1-5, 1 being critical. Thank you, Danielle << File: md.xls >>
zufferli-j/deleted_items/101.
<13826713.1075842024033.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
RBC Capital Markets Report on Ontario Electricity Restructuring
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T20:28:02Z
This is a pretty good general reference on Ontario.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/102.
<21134403.1075842024057.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
RE: Canadian Online Counterparties
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T19:36:16Z
Thanks for the quick turnaround. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Zufferli, John Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 12:25 PM To: Diamond, Daniel Cc: Cowan, Mike; Dorland, Chris; Clark, Chad Subject: RE: Canadian Online Counterparties Here is the list updated with responsibility names. << File: Top 100 List For Commercial Calls- revised.xls >>
zufferli-j/deleted_items/103.
<32258382.1075842024080.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Signed Offers
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T18:51:13Z
Guys, can you gather up the signed employment offers and bring them to me - I'm getting pressured to get these signed - so far, I've only got two returned to me (and one is mine).
zufferli-j/deleted_items/104.
<27684459.1075842024103.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Ontario overview
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T18:24:55Z
To continue getting familiar with Ontario, please review the document OEFC_demandSupp_UBS.ppt on your I:/common/OEFC directory. It is a presentation we gave to OEFC in the fall. Here is a spreadsheet with additional information. Some intertie information may vary from source to source. This is due to the IMO's regular small adjustments to the capacity numbers. GT
zufferli-j/deleted_items/105.
<26948780.1075842024128.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Canadian Online Counterparties
2002-01-28T17:25:08Z
Chris, Here is a copy of our top counterparty list. The online group will be sending out a packet that includes this list and all the information you're group will need to get started. Please fill out the areas highlighted in red. We simply need to assign someone from your office that will be our point of contact, as well as the person responsible for getting in the Password Application. We are using each of the desks relationships to jump start the effort. Once that is complete, the responsibility will role back over to the online group. If at all possible, I'd like to have the appropriate names early this afternoon. Sorry for the short notice. Thanks again for your help, Dan
zufferli-j/deleted_items/106.
<10426999.1075842024152.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Reference
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T16:59:02Z
John, hope things are going well up there for you. The big day is almost here for you and Jessica. I was wondering if I could use your name as a job reference if need be. I am just trying to get everything in order just in case something happens. John
zufferli-j/deleted_items/107.
<25332834.1075842024176.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Canadian Gas & Power Online Trading UPDATE
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T16:37:46Z
John, Please review the attached spreadsheets (Stack and Website) and note any changes. Thank you, Stephanie Sever EnronOnline 713-853-3465
zufferli-j/deleted_items/108.
<30324039.1075842024203.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: The Rules of Manhood
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T16:13:11Z
-----Original Message----- From: "Engelhardt, Matthew" <[email protected]>@ENRON Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:54 PM To: Dorland, Chris; Dorland, Dan; 'Kbibby (E-mail); Max Zureski (CA - Calgary) (E-mail); Mike George (E-mail); Nate Dogg (E-mail); Colin Clements (CA - Calgary) (E-mail) Subject: FW: The Rules of Manhood -----Original Message----- From: Yee, Colin Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:01 AM To: Alder, Doug; Bain, Stacy; Engelhardt, Matthew; Maxwell, Tara; Simpson, Regan; Steinke, Nathan; Tymofichuk, Christin Subject: FW: The Rules of Manhood -----Original Message----- From: Colin Yee [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:26 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Wes Giebelhaus Subject: Fw: The Rules of Manhood > The Rules of Manhood > >>> > >>> * Thou shall not rent the movie Chocolat. > > > >>> * In Black Jack, always split aces and eights. No arguments. > > > >>> * Under no circumstances may two men share an umbrella... > > > >>> * Any man who brings a camera to a bachelor party may be legally > killed > >>> and eaten by his fellow partygoers. > > > >>> * When you are queried by a buddy's wife, girlfriend, mother, > father, priest, shrink, dentist, accountant or dog walker, you need not and > should not provide any useful information whatsoever as to his whereabouts. > You are permitted to deny his very existence. > > * Unless he murdered someone in your immediate family, you must bail a > friend out of jail within 12 hours. > > * You may exaggerate any anecdote told in a bar by 50 percent without > recrimination; beyond that, anyone within earshot is allowed to > call,"Bullshit!". (Exception: When tryi > ng to pick up a girl, the allowable > exaggeration rate rises to 400 percent.) > > * If you've known a guy for more than 24 hours, his sister is off limits > forever. > > * The maximum amount of time you have to wait for another guy who's >>> > running late is 5 minutes. For a girl, you are required to wait 10 >minutes > for >>> every point of hotness she scores on the classic 1-10 scale. > > * Bitching about the brand of free beer in a buddies refrigerator is > >>> forbidden. You may gripe if the temperature is unsuitable. > > > * No man is ever required to buy a birthday present for another man. In > >>> fact, even remembering a friends birthday is strictly optional. > > * Agreeing to distract the ugly friend of a hot babe your buddy is > >>trying to hook up with is your legal duty. Should you get carried away > >with your >>> good deed and end up having sex with the beast, your pal > is forbidden to >>speak of > it, even at your bachelor party. > > * Before dating a buddy's ex, you are required to ask his permission > >and he, in return, is required to grant it. > > > * Women who claim they "love to watch sports" must be treated as spies >>> > until they demonstrate knowledge of the game and the ability to pick a > >Buffalo wing clean. > > * If a man's zipper is down, that's his problem- you didn't see > >nothin'. > > * The universal compensation for buddies who help you move is beer. > > * A man must never own a cat or like his girlfriend's cat. > > * Your girlfriend must bond with your buddy's girlfriends within 30 > >>> minutes of meeting them. You, however, are not required to make nice > >with her >>> girlfriend's significant dick-heads --- low-level sports > bonding is all >>> the law requires. > > * When stumbling upon other guys watching a sports event, you may > >always ask the score of the game in progress, but you may never ask w > ho's > >playing. > > > >>> * When your girlfriend/wife expresses a desire to fix her whiney > friend >>up with your pal, you may give her the go-ahead only if you'll be > able to >>> warn your buddy and give him time to prepare excuses about > joining the >>> priesthood. > > > >>> * It is permissible to consume a fruity chick drink only when you're > >>> sunning on a tropical beach... and it's delivered by a topless super > >model...and it's free. > > > >>> * A man in the company of a hot, suggestively dressed woman must > remain >>> sober enough to fight. > > > >>> * If a buddy is out numbered, out manned, or too drunk to fight, you > >>must jump into the fight. Exception: If within the last 24 hours his > actions >>> have caused you to think, "What this guy needs is a good > ass-whooping", >then >>> you may sit back and enjoy. > > > >>> > * Friends don't let friends wear Speedos. Ever. Issue closed. > > > >>> * Never hesitate to reach for the last beer or the last slice of > pizza, >>> but not both. That's just plain mean. > > > >>> * If you compliment a guy on his six-pack, you better be referring to > >>his beer. > > > >>> * Never join your girlfriend/wife in dissing a buddy, except when > she's >>> withholding sex pending your response. > > > >>> * Never talk to a man in the bathroom unless you're on equal footing; > >>> either both urinating or both waiting in line. In all other > situations, >a nod >>is all the conversation you need. > > > >>> * If a buddy is already singing along to a song in the car, you may > not >>> join him.... > > > >>> * If fast dancing is absolutely necessary, a man may NEVER raise his > >>hands above shoulder level .... > > > >> > ;> * Before allowing drunken friend to cheat on his girl, you must > attempt >>> one intervention. If he is able to get on his feet, look you > in the eye, >and deliver a, "F--- OFF!", you are absolved of all > responsibility. > > * The morning after you and a babe who was formerly "just a friend" >have > carnal, drunken monkey sex, the fact that you're feeling weird and > >>guilty is no reason not to nail her again before the discussion about > >what a big >>> mistake it was. > > >
zufferli-j/deleted_items/109.
<10836552.1075842020832.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
FW: Flint Report
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-06T14:43:43Z
-----Original Message----- From: Jai Hawker <[email protected]>@ENRON Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:55 AM To: Dorland, Dan; Dorland, Chris Subject: Flint Report Here you go, bitches. <<20020111.pdf>> Jai Hawker Peters & Co. Limited (403) 261-2259 - 20020111.pdf
zufferli-j/deleted_items/11.
<31417584.1075842024237.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Syncrasy Daily Trader Summary for Mon, Jan 28, 2002
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-28T15:50:25Z
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE] Syncrasy, LLC? 713.228.8470 Off 713.228.4147 Fax 909 Texas Avenue Suite 1314 Houston, TX 77002 www.syncrasy.com Sales: 713.228.4407 Development Offices: 970.247.4139 Off 970.247.7951 Fax 835 Main Avenue Suite 221 Durango, CO 81301 [IMAGE] Complimentary version of Trader Summary from Syncrasy, LLC and APB Energy Inc. - If you would like to receive this product early in the morning please call Syncrasy at 713 228 4407 for more information or send an email to [email protected] - If you would like to be added to this daily email list please send an email to [email protected] - If you would like to be removed from this daily email please reply to this email with the words "CANCEL" or send an email to [email protected] Data last updated: Monday, Jan 28, 2002 at 07:44AM EST Commentary last updated: Monday, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:13AM EST Meteorologist: Andy Weingarten... APB Energy / True Quote Congratulations Andy Weingarten, APB Energy! Winner of the $50,000 Winter 2000-01 AQUILA/AMS Seasonal Forecasting Competition. For more information please visit: AMS or Aquila New! >> Printable PDF Trader Summary (You must have Adobe Acrobat Reader to open or print a PDF) Click here for a definition of 'Average-Daily Maximum Temperature' Today: Monday, January 28, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 54 -1 ERCOT(SP) 75 +1 FRCC(SE) 78 -2 MAAC(NE) 61 +1 MAIN(CTR) 44 -1 MAPP(HP) 23 NC NPCC(NE) 52 +2 SERC(SE) 69 -1 SPP(SP) 64 -3 WSCC(NW) 33 -1 WSCC(RK) 34 +2 WSCC(SW) 49 -1 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 39 25 47 30 32 67 69 44 Max 46 35 56 33 41 72 73 51 Min 31 16 41 25 27 62 65 40 Range 15 19 15 8 14 10 8 11 StD-P 2.8 4.1 4.3 2.4 3.9 2.9 2.4 3.4 Count 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 1-5 Discussion: Summer-type ridge in the SE to get beaten down by approaching U.S. storm. Trough to develop in the East turning the pattern to a normal to below normal temperature regime. We are looking at a deep trough in the West and strong ridge in the East on this mornings weather maps. Dozens of record highs were set this weekend from the Plains eastward while it was cold enough in the NW for snow in Seattle. Things are on the move now which should end the warmth for most areas by the end of the week. Relative to recent weeks, it certainly looks a lot colder, but when one considers the time of year and steps back, well most areas just don't get that cold. This looks to me to be the type of situation where it will be colder in the Plains and then modify as it heads East. This has a similar feel to what happened in lat! e December. At the moment, we are devoid of snow cover, so I have a difficult time getting too pumped up over all of this. Speaking of snow, the Western U.S. system may produce some moderate snows over the far North and Lakes as it pushes from the High Plains NE to Canada. This does not appear to be a situation that favors any East Coast winter storm development. Short term numbers will still show warmth in the East, but that is a function of the next couple of days. The Western and Central U.S. temperature departures are already below normal and that trend will shift East later this week. Tomorrow: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 52 +1 ERCOT(SP) 75 +2 FRCC(SE) 81 NC MAAC(NE) 59 -1 MAIN(CTR) 42 +6 MAPP(HP) 21 +4 NPCC(NE) 44 -4 SERC(SE) 73 +1 SPP(SP) 61 +11 WSCC(NW) 31 -2 WSCC(RK) 24 -2 WSCC(SW) 47 -1 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 37 23 48 29 23 69 69 43 Max 41 26 56 33 39 75 73 49 Min 25 16 42 23 15 65 66 38 Range 16 10 14 10 24 10 7 11 StD-P 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 5.8 3.0 2.4 3.9 Count 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 3: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 44 +6 ERCOT(SP) 64 +3 FRCC(SE) 81 NC MAAC(NE) 59 +11 MAIN(CTR) 29 +1 MAPP(HP) 14 -6 NPCC(NE) 41 +8 SERC(SE) 73 +5 SPP(SP) 38 +1 WSCC(NW) 35 -2 WSCC(RK) 17 -8 WSCC(SW) 47 -3 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 33 17 46 31 16 70 63 42 Max 39 25 51 35 26 75 72 47 Min 29 12 41 27 9 65 57 37 Range 10 13 10 8 17 10 15 10 StD-P 2.9 3.1 2.1 1.6 4.7 3.1 3.4 3.6 Count 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 4: Thursday, January 31, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 47 +8 ERCOT(SP) 55 +5 FRCC(SE) 80 +1 MAAC(NE) 51 +5 MAIN(CTR) 28 -2 MAPP(HP) 16 -9 NPCC(NE) 28 -1 SERC(SE) 67 +4 SPP(SP) 35 -7 WSCC(NW) 39 -1 WSCC(RK) 25 -6 WSCC(SW) 50 -2 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 31 18 41 34 19 69 51 44 Max 35 23 48 39 25 74 60 50 Min 27 14 35 30 12 66 45 39 Range 8 9 13 9 13 8 15 11 StD-P 2.2 2.7 4.1 1.4 3.4 2.3 4.1 3.2 Count 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 5: Friday, February 1, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 33 -1 ERCOT(SP) 53 -2 FRCC(SE) 77 -1 MAAC(NE) 49 +10 MAIN(CTR) 24 -8 MAPP(HP) 18 -12 NPCC(NE) 40 +9 SERC(SE) 56 +3 SPP(SP) 41 -5 WSCC(NW) 41 NC WSCC(RK) 32 -4 WSCC(SW) 53 -1 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 23 23 43 35 23 60 45 47 Max 28 28 50 41 32 69 51 53 Min 17 18 33 31 15 55 36 42 Range 11 10 17 10 17 14 15 11 StD-P 2.6 3.2 4.8 1.8 4.3 3.8 5.2 2.7 Count 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 6-10 Discussion: The 6-10 day period looks chilly, but hardly cold and also may be very quiet. The SE ridge is replaced by a trough in the means so we should not see the recent spring regime. The trend over the Western part of the continent ( US and Canada) is for Pacific zonal flow. The real bitter cold that has been in Canada the last several weeks should gradually modify. We will likely see two distinct branches in the jet stream, an arctic branch in the North and subtropical branch in the South. We get our big storms and bitter cold outbreaks when they phase(come together). Most of the extreme forecasts you see come together when this phasing occurs. I can not rule it out in the future, but it looks unlikely to me for now. To me, the bottom line for this period(and beyond)is for a slight cold bias East and a close to normal look elsewhere.! Day 6: Saturday, February 2, 2002 Click Here for Syncrasy's 6-10 summary information. Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 30 -6 ERCOT(SP) 53 -3 FRCC(SE) 71 -2 MAAC(NE) 38 -1 MAIN(CTR) 28 -7 MAPP(HP) 26 -5 NPCC(NE) 28 -1 SERC(SE) 51 -3 SPP(SP) 43 -3 WSCC(NW) 40 -1 WSCC(RK) 35 -3 WSCC(SW) 55 NC Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 24 28 27 37 26 51 47 50 Max 28 33 38 40 35 61 55 55 Min 18 25 15 32 19 42 40 46 Range 10 8 23 8 16 19 15 9 StD-P 2.6 2.0 5.2 2.5 5.0 5.8 4.6 2.4 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 7: Sunday, February 3, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 33 -5 ERCOT(SP) 58 -2 FRCC(SE) 72 NC MAAC(NE) 36 -5 MAIN(CTR) 31 -3 MAPP(HP) 27 -2 NPCC(NE) 26 -7 SERC(SE) 53 -2 SPP(SP) 47 NC WSCC(NW) 42 -1 WSCC(RK) 37 NC WSCC(SW) 56 NC Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 28 31 27 37 29 51 50 51 Max 31 35 34 42 38 56 56 56 Min 23 28 19 34 23 46 42 48 Range 8 7 15 8 15 10 14 8 StD-P 2.0 1.7 3.6 1.9 4.5 3.2 4.3 2.4 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 8: Monday, February 4, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 31 -4 ERCOT(SP) 55 -1 FRCC(SE) 61 -4 MAAC(NE) 31 -3 MAIN(CTR) 33 -3 MAPP(HP) 31 -4 NPCC(NE) 24 -6 SERC(SE) 44 -4 SPP(SP) 42 -2 WSCC(NW) 35 -3 WSCC(RK) 24 -3 WSCC(SW) 51 +1 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 31 32 29 39 30 51 54 53 Max 33 37 34 42 40 56 58 58 Min 28 31 26 35 24 47 48 51 Range 5 6 8 7 16 9 10 7 StD-P 1.7 1.5 2.8 2.6 4.9 3.0 2.3 2.2 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 9: Tuesday, February 5, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 34 -3 ERCOT(SP) 54 NC FRCC(SE) 65 -1 MAAC(NE) 40 -1 MAIN(CTR) 28 -7 MAPP(HP) 23 -14 NPCC(NE) 33 -1 SERC(SE) 49 -1 SPP(SP) 39 -7 WSCC(NW) 38 NC WSCC(RK) 30 -3 WSCC(SW) 53 +1 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 30 32 31 39 33 53 53 54 Max 34 37 36 43 40 57 57 59 Min 27 30 25 36 28 49 50 52 Range 7 7 11 7 12 8 7 7 StD-P 1.6 2.3 3.2 2.0 3.7 2.1 2.1 2.2 Count 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 10: Wednesday, February 6, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 22 -18 ERCOT(SP) 55 -3 FRCC(SE) 61 -5 MAAC(NE) 30 -7 MAIN(CTR) 18 -25 MAPP(HP) 22 -19 NPCC(NE) 34 NC SERC(SE) 42 -7 SPP(SP) 47 -4 WSCC(NW) 38 +3 WSCC(RK) 30 -1 WSCC(SW) 53 +3 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 21 26 29 32 21 47 47 44 Max 28 35 34 38 30 49 54 53 Min 15 17 16 23 11 45 40 32 Range 13 18 18 15 19 4 14 21 StD-P 3.5 7.4 4.5 4.8 7.9 0.9 5.7 8.6 Count 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Trader Summary is designed around and formatted for the [IMAGE]Plasma displays, RainbowWall? and DataWall? Trader Summary can also be viewed from www.syncrasy.com or www.apbenergy.com or www.truequote.com [IMAGE]
zufferli-j/deleted_items/110.
<22805449.1075842024387.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Litigation Initiative Coordination Meeting- ECC main boardroom, 11am, Monday, Jan.28/02
2002-01-28T15:14:51Z
We have scheduled the above meeting and look forward to meeting with you at the appointed time. A. Robert Anderson Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP 3500, 855 Second Street SW Calgary, AB T2P 4J8 Tel: 403.260-9624 Fax: 403.260.9700 E-mail: [email protected] This e-mail communication is confidential and legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown above or by return e-mail and delete this communication and any copy immediately. Thank you.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/111.
<32471560.1075842024421.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Weekend Outage Report for 1/25/02-1/27/02
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-25T22:18:55Z
_________________________________________________________________ WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY FOR 1/25/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/28/2002 12:00:00 AM _________________________________________________________________ Impact: San Palo Time: Thur 1/24/2002 12:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 1/27/2002 12:00:00 PM CT Thur 1/24/2002 10:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 1/27/2002 10:00:00 AM PT Thur 1/24/2002 6:00:00 PM London thru Sun 1/27/2002 6:00:00 PM London Outage: New server room Environments Impacted: File Server, Notes servers, Print Server, Internet access. Purpose: Put 02 servers room in just 01 room. Rebuild all cabling (data and voice). This is set on CST. Backout: Back to original room. Contact(s): Nilson Busto 55-11-5503-1347 Impact: Corp Time: Fri 1/25/2002 1:45:00 PM CT thru Fri 1/25/2002 2:45:00 PM CT Fri 1/25/2002 11:45:00 AM PT thru Fri 1/25/2002 12:45:00 PM PT Fri 1/25/2002 7:45:00 PM London thru Fri 1/25/2002 8:45:00 PM London Outage: Change Management Emergency Outage Environments Impacted: Change Management System Outage. Purpose: Change Management Application needs emergency maintenance. Backout: NA Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545 Ray, Edward 7138536744 Brooks, Sean L 713-345-8077
zufferli-j/deleted_items/112.
<20228964.1075842024445.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Subpoena Response Team
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-25T22:00:56Z
David Grant has assembled a team to work on gathering documents in response to the numerous subpoenas the company is receiving from Congress, the SEC and the Department of Justice. Please cooperate with the team if they need your assistance. If you have any questions, please call David Grant at 3-6239.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/113.
<14699647.1075842024468.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Market Data Applications
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-25T21:58:31Z
John: Here are the contracts we are currently creating with UBS. Please verify that we have not missed any applications/publications or subscriptions. Highlight in Red the systems you will need and mark the priority from 1-5, 1 being critical. Thank you, Danielle
zufferli-j/deleted_items/114.
<33125057.1075842024517.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Winner of the Vintage Enron Golf Shirt!!!!
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-25T21:23:07Z
It was a tough decision, but Angela and I have picked a winner and two runners-up for coming up with the most creative idea for the "mystery item." The winners and their answers are listed below: Winner: David Hanslip for his answer of: "...To the casual observer, they look like the support pillars of any standard monitor stand. In reality, their special hollowed out interiors may be used to conceal sensitive accounting documents outlining off-balance sheet financing transactions from the FBI." Second Runner Up: Paul Dunsmore for his answer of: "They are clearly snow shoes for the Smurfs that live in our office..." Third Runner Up: Carlee Gawiuk for her answer of: "The purpose of the object is for getting the attention of the commercial staff when they are not paying attention to their admin assistants. There are 6 of them, 3 for each phone. Simply pick up the object, close your fist around it, extend your arm behind your head, bring it forward in a fluid motion and release the object in the general direction of the person you are wanting to get the attention of. If it takes more then one throw, that is completely acceptable. It takes a little practice, so don't be too hard on your self if you need to borrow a few from the other phone. It is not too big, so no serious damage will be done, & it's not too small so the person or anyone surrounding them will not lose an eye. The colour is black to contrast with desk, or floor, so it is easy to find after it has been thrown." Thank you to everyone else for your very creative answers! Congratulations to David, Paul, and Carlee (you may drop by front reception to pick up your prize)!!! Thank you, Megan Scott
zufferli-j/deleted_items/116.
<31267177.1075842024541.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
John, what is your success worth?
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-25T21:21:59Z
[IMAGE] If you would like to be removed from our email list, please click or go to: http://www.questia.com/remove and provide your email address. [IMAGE] Hot Head or Cool Head? How do you react to conflict? Do you want to jump in with fists blazing? Or maybe you prefer a gentler way to deal with conflict. Sometimes the resolution to conflict is better reached through peaceful methods. No one in history demonstrates this more effectively than Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi's doctrine of nonviolent protest for social and political progress in India has been revered around the world. January marks the anniversary of his assassination; and if you are interested in reading more about this famous leader and his nonviolent methods, you'll want to check out the books below from search our collection or start with the books we've selected below. [IMAGE] The life of another famous nonviolent protestor is also celebrated in January. Be sure to check out our Featured Topic on Martin Luther King, Jr., and read his "I've Got A Dream" speech. Why Questia is Better See why 1,000s of subscribers believe Questia is better than other Internet sites or the library. Non-Violent Resistance (Satyagraha) Written by Mahatma Gandhi Mahatma Gandhi: Peaceful Revolutionary Written by Haridas T. Muzumdar War Without Violence: A Study of Gandhi's Method and Its Accomplishments Written by Krishnalal Shridharani Gandhi on War and Peace Written by Rashmi-Sudha Puri Selected Writings of Mahatma Gandhi Written by Mahatma Gandhi Subscribe today and start enjoying success Don't let your resolution slip! It's been almost a month since you made that New Year's resolution to become a better student. Becoming a better student is certainly within your grasp. Did you know that 8 out of 10 subscribers told us they believed they got a better grade on their paper using Questia? Subscribe today and you can start enjoying success, too. Questia is affordable What is your academic achievement worth? Questia offers a monthly subscription that's less than your monthly pizza budget! It's less than what you pay for textbooks, and it's far less than the investment you already have in your education. Save Time Subscribing to Questia will not only make your life easier, it will save you all those trips to the library. With our time-saving research and writing tools, you'll have time to enjoy all the things you like to do -- like sleeping and sharing pizza with friends. Take our free test drive and click through the features to see how much time you'll save. Wishing you success, The Questia Team (c)2002 Questia Media America, Inc. Questia and the Questia (logo) are service marks of Questia Media and its affiliates.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/117.
<11494248.1075842024597.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
RE: Canada online products and top counterparties
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-25T20:27:51Z
Thanks John. -----Original Message----- From: Zufferli, John Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:26 PM To: Diamond, Daniel Subject: Canada online products and top counterparties << File: EOLProductsatNetco.xls >>
zufferli-j/deleted_items/118.
<10965403.1075842024620.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Danielle Macinkowski
2002-01-25T18:53:45Z
Is handling the external data feeds. She can be reached on 37926. I don't know if she is looking after Canada or not, but I suspect she is. Dave
zufferli-j/deleted_items/119.
<30032862.1075842020869.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
AIR CANADA'S WEBSAVER (TM)
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-06T05:15:00Z
<html><head></head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff"><font color="#000000"> <IMG SRC="http://www.aircanada.ca/images/websvrle50.gif" ALT="Websaver" WIDTH="194" HEIGHT="71"> <pre> **********PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE************ ******************************************************************** AIR CANADA'S WEBSAVER (TM) ******************************************************************** Enjoy our Websaver Specials! Depart as early as Friday and stay as late as the following Tuesday! Air Canada's WEBSAVER* specials are only valid for travel originating in Canada and/or the United States. To enjoy WEBSAVER specials, flights must be booked online or with your Travel Agent. For Air Canada WEBSAVER* bookings, you can now go on-line at: <a href="https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html"> https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html</a> Also, to stay informed of any changes to your flight status, register a request for a flight notification at: <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/services/mobile/notification.html"> http://www.aircanada.ca/services/mobile/notification.html</a> and automatically receive alerts through your text enabled phone/pager or email address. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Air Canada Vacations offers great package deals to its newest destination, Cuba. Please click on the following link to view our latest specials: <a href="http://www.aircanadavacations.com/ACV/start.htm"> http://www.aircanadavacations.com/ACV/start.htm</a> --------------------------------------------------------------------- <b>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html"> http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html</a></b> _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : February 6, 2002 to February 9, 2002 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted February 10, 2002 through February 10, 2002 inclusive Inbound: permitted February 23, 2002 through February 24, 2002 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by February 24, 2002 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Toronto - Sao Paulo 799.00 104.40 903.40 DL-56VTTP _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : February 6, 2002 to February 9, 2002 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted February 13, 2002 through February 13, 2002 inclusive Inbound: permitted February 20, 2002 through February 20, 2002 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by February 20, 2002 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Vancouver - Puerto Vallarta 549.00 104.30 653.30 DL-56VTTN _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : February 6, 2002 to February 9, 2002 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted February 19, 2002 through February 20, 2002 inclusive Inbound: permitted February 26, 2002 through February 27, 2002 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by February 27, 2002 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Toronto - Cancun 549.00 111.80 660.80 DL-56VTTM _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : February 6, 2002 to February 9, 2002 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted February 7, 2002 through February 28, 2002 inclusive Inbound: permitted February 10, 2002 through March 12, 2002 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by March 12, 2002 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Toronto - Tel Aviv 899.00 37.50 936.50 DL-56VTUH _____________________________________________________________________ **********TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR INTERNATIONAL SPECIALS*************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : February 6, 2002 to February 9, 2002 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted February 7, 2002 through February 28, 2002 inclusive Inbound: permitted February 14, 2002 through March 14, 2002 inclusive Routing : Valid on AC nonstop/direct flights only. Reservations and Ticketing : Reservations are required 1 day prior to departure. Ticketing must be completed within 1 day after reservations are made or at least 1 day prior to departure, whichever is earlier. Maximum Stay : All travel must be complete by March 14, 2002 Combinations : Not Permitted Stopovers/Rerouting/Rebooking : Not Permitted Children/Seniors Discount : Not Applicable Infant Discount : 90%, provided infant not occupying a seat. Cancellations : Non - Refundable *International fares are only valid for travel originating in Canada - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Calgary - London (LHR) 649.00 83.64 732.64 DL-56VTVH Vancouver - London (LHR) 649.00 70.80 719.80 DL-56VTVG _____________________________________________________________________ *****************TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR SPECIAL OFFERS**************** _____________________________________________________________________ Fare basis code: LWEBSAVE Sale Period : February 6, 2002 to February 8, 2002 Travel Period : Outbound: permitted February 8, 2002 through February 9, 2002 inclusive Inbound: permitted February 11, 2002 through February 12, 2002 inclusive - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Toronto - New York (EWR) 209.00 160.22 369.22 DL-56VTDU - From USA in (USD $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Boston - Toronto 136.00 84.33 220.33 DL-56VTDS St. Louis - Toronto 145.00 86.50 231.50 DL-56VTDT _____________________________________________________________________ *****************TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR WEEKEND FARES***************** ************************HOTELS & CAR RENTALS************************* _____________________________________________________________________ Air Canada's WEBSAVER* and Partners offer great discounts for last minute travel to selected destinations each week. The fares listed are valid for new reservations only and for travel this weekend only; you must depart on Friday February 08, 2002 or Saturday February 09, 2002 returning anytime the following Monday February 11, 2002 or Tuesday February 12, 2002. Please note that not all flights are available for Friday departures. For Air Canada WEBSAVER* bookings, you can now book on-line at: <a href="https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html"> https://w4.aircanada.ca/aeroplan/mileageE.html</a> or call your Travel Agent between Wednesday and Friday. If you are booking through your Travel Agent, please be sure to give them the coupon number, and mention Air Canada's WEBSAVER* fares. For hotels and car rentals please follow the instructions listed below with each respective offer. ***** TRAVEL FARES ARE QUOTED AS ROUND-TRIP AND MAY ORIGINATE ***** ********* IN EITHER CITY OF THE FOLLOWING PAIRS ************ For GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS regarding Air Canada's WEBSAVER, Partner Hotels and Car Rentals, please click the address below: <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html"> http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html</a> - From/Within CANADA in (CAN $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Bagotville - Montreal 179.00 74.06 253.06 GP-56TL2Y Calgary - Cranbrook 99.00 63.64 162.64 GP-56TKYE Calgary - Grande Prairie 199.00 70.64 269.64 GP-56TKX6 Calgary - Kelowna 99.00 68.99 167.99 GP-56TKYL Calgary - Lloydminister 129.00 65.74 194.74 GP-56TKWP Calgary - Montreal 299.00 104.93 403.93 GP-56TL47 Calgary - Ottawa 299.00 88.34 387.34 GP-56TL49 Calgary - Regina 136.00 76.93 212.93 GP-56TKYZ Calgary - Saskatoon 136.00 71.58 207.58 GP-56TKZ5 Calgary - Winnipeg 149.00 77.84 226.84 GP-56TKZK Comox - Vancouver 109.00 51.50 160.50 GP-56TKZE Cranbrook - Vancouver 139.00 53.60 192.60 GP-56TKYA Deer Lake - Halifax 199.00 88.50 287.50 GP-56TL25 Deer Lake - St.John's 169.00 84.00 253.00 GP-56TL2J Edmonton - Fort McMurray 169.00 66.40 235.40 GP-56TKX5 Edmonton - Grande Prairie 179.00 67.10 246.10 GP-56TKWW Edmonton - Toronto 299.00 86.20 385.20 GP-56TL3L Fort St. John B - Vancouver 209.00 58.50 267.50 GP-56TKYM Goose Bay - St.John's 199.00 88.50 287.50 GP-56TL2G Halifax - Montreal 199.00 88.56 287.56 DL-56VTQC Halifax - Ottawa 199.00 99.20 298.20 DL-56VTQ9 Halifax - Sydney 139.00 79.50 218.50 GP-56TL2L Kamloops - Vancouver 99.00 50.80 149.80 GP-56TKY9 Moncton - Toronto 219.00 90.70 309.70 GP-56TL4E Montreal - Rouyn / Noranda 199.00 77.06 276.06 GP-56TL3E North Bay - Toronto 109.00 62.20 171.20 GP-56TKVW Ottawa - Quebec City 169.00 94.75 263.75 GP-56TL2Z Ottawa - Vancouver 299.00 75.50 374.50 GP-56TL3Q Ottawa - Winnipeg 199.00 79.20 278.20 GP-56TKZU Penticton - Vancouver 109.00 51.50 160.50 GP-56TKY8 Prince George - Vancouver 209.00 58.50 267.50 GP-56TKYR Quebec City - Toronto 199.00 99.26 298.26 DL-56VTQF Regina - Saskatoon 99.00 66.85 165.85 GP-56TL3F Regina - Toronto 239.00 82.00 321.00 GP-56TL3J Regina - Winnipeg 146.00 75.49 221.49 GP-56TKZ2 Saint John - Toronto 219.00 90.70 309.70 GP-56TKZY Sarnia - Toronto 79.00 60.10 139.10 GP-56TKWC Saskatoon - Winnipeg 136.00 69.44 205.44 GP-56TKZ3 Sault Ste.Marie - Toronto 149.00 75.70 224.70 GP-56TKVY St.John's - Toronto 259.00 108.20 367.20 DL-56VTQE Thunder Bay - Toronto 209.00 69.20 278.20 GP-56TL4L Thunder Bay - Winnipeg 169.00 66.40 235.40 GP-56TL3R Timmins - Toronto 189.00 78.50 267.50 GP-56TKW4 Toronto - Victoria 309.00 81.55 390.55 GP-56TL4G Toronto - Windsor 99.00 61.50 160.50 GP-56TKW9 Vancouver - Victoria 89.00 55.45 144.45 GP-56TKZB Vancouver - Winnipeg 199.00 68.50 267.50 GP-56TKZM Calgary - Houston IAH 299.00 163.85 462.85 GP-56TL7M Calgary - San Francisco 229.00 166.16 395.16 GP-56TL4M Halifax - Boston 199.00 160.32 359.32 GP-56TL5U Montreal - Hartford 166.00 148.91 314.91 GP-56TL5S Montreal - Los Angeles 319.00 157.22 476.22 GP-56TL57 Montreal - New York (LGA) 199.00 148.82 347.82 DL-56VRN2 Montreal - Philadelphia 193.00 150.80 343.80 GP-56TL6Y Ottawa - Boston 209.00 160.22 369.22 GP-56TL7F Ottawa - New York (EWR) 199.00 159.52 358.52 DL-56VRN4 Toronto - Albany 183.00 158.40 341.40 GP-56TL5V Toronto - Allentown PA 166.00 159.61 325.61 GP-56TL6S Toronto - Atlanta 249.00 165.42 414.42 GP-56TL7N Toronto - Baltimore 194.00 159.17 353.17 GP-56TL6E Toronto - Charlotte 235.00 157.23 392.23 GP-56TL59 Toronto - Chicago (ORD) 209.00 162.62 371.62 GP-56TL5L Toronto - Cleveland 183.00 158.40 341.40 GP-56TL6A Toronto - Columbus 183.00 158.40 341.40 GP-56TL67 Toronto - Dayton 200.00 161.99 361.99 GP-56TL62 Toronto - Detroit 119.00 156.32 275.32 GP-56TL6N Toronto - Grande Rapids 159.00 156.72 315.72 GP-56TL64 Toronto - Harrisburg PA 166.00 157.21 323.21 GP-56TL6Q Toronto - Hartford 172.00 160.03 332.03 GP-56TL6K Toronto - Manchester 183.00 158.40 341.40 GP-56TL66 Toronto - Minneapolis 219.00 163.32 382.32 GP-56TL7D Toronto - Nashville 239.00 162.32 401.32 GP-56TL79 Toronto - Phoenix 259.00 163.72 422.72 GP-56TL4R Toronto - Pittsburgh 177.00 157.98 334.98 GP-56TL6J Toronto - Providence 193.00 159.10 352.10 GP-56TL6F Toronto - Raleigh-Durham 219.00 156.11 375.11 GP-56TL5B Toronto - Richmond 209.00 160.22 369.22 GP-56TL6B Toronto - Rochester 154.00 156.37 310.37 GP-56TL5X Toronto - San Diego 329.00 168.62 497.62 GP-56TL4Z Toronto - Seattle 323.00 170.60 493.60 GP-56TL53 Toronto - Washington(DCA) 209.00 162.62 371.62 DL-56VRN6 Vancouver - Los Angeles 200.00 148.89 348.89 GP-56TL4X Vancouver - Phoenix 199.00 148.82 347.82 GP-56TL4V Vancouver - Portland OR 142.00 147.23 289.23 GP-56TL6W Vancouver - San Francisco 156.00 148.21 304.21 GP-56TL4Q Vancouver - Seattle 108.00 144.85 252.85 GP-56TL6T Winnipeg - Chicago (ORD) 241.00 164.86 405.86 GP-56TL5Q - From USA in (USD $) BASE TAX TOTAL COUPON# SURCHARGES Albany - Toronto 119.00 83.05 202.05 GP-56TL5W Allentown PA - Toronto 108.00 83.73 191.73 GP-56TL6R Atlanta - Toronto 162.00 87.78 249.78 GP-56TL7P Baltimore - Toronto 126.00 83.58 209.58 GP-56TL6D Boston - Halifax 129.00 84.30 213.30 GP-56TL5T Boston - Ottawa 136.00 84.33 220.33 GP-56TL7G Charlotte - Toronto 153.00 82.60 235.60 GP-56TL5A Chicago (ORD) - Toronto 136.00 85.83 221.83 GP-56TL5K Chicago (ORD) - Winnipeg 156.00 87.33 243.33 GP-56TL5P Cleveland - Toronto 119.00 83.05 202.05 GP-56TL69 Columbus - Toronto 119.00 83.05 202.05 GP-56TL68 Dayton - Toronto 130.00 85.38 215.38 GP-56TL5Z Detroit - Toronto 77.00 81.40 158.40 GP-56TL6M Grande Rapids - Toronto 103.00 81.85 184.85 GP-56TL63 Harrisburg PA - Toronto 108.00 82.23 190.23 GP-56TL6P Hartford - Montreal 108.00 77.09 185.09 GP-56TL5R Hartford - Toronto 112.00 84.03 196.03 GP-56TL6L Houston IAH - Calgary 194.00 87.01 281.01 GP-56TL7W Los Angeles - Montreal 207.00 83.01 290.01 GP-56TL58 Los Angeles - Vancouver 130.00 77.24 207.24 GP-56TL4Y Manchester - Toronto 119.00 83.05 202.05 GP-56TL65 Minneapolis - Toronto 142.00 86.28 228.28 GP-56TL7E Nashville - Toronto 155.00 85.75 240.75 GP-56TL7A New York (EWR) - Ottawa 129.00 83.80 212.80 DL-56VRN5 New York (LGA) - Montreal 129.00 77.16 206.16 DL-56VRN3 Philadelphia - Montreal 125.00 78.36 203.36 GP-56TL6X Phoenix - Toronto 168.00 86.73 254.73 GP-56TL4S Phoenix - Vancouver 129.00 77.16 206.16 GP-56TL4W Pittsburgh - Toronto 115.00 82.75 197.75 GP-56TL6H Portland OR - Vancouver 92.00 75.89 167.89 GP-56TL6V Providence - Toronto 125.00 83.50 208.50 GP-56TL6G Raleigh-Durham - Toronto 142.00 81.78 223.78 GP-56TL5C Richmond - Toronto 136.00 84.33 220.33 GP-56TL6C Rochester - Toronto 100.00 81.63 181.63 GP-56TL5Y San Diego - Toronto 214.00 90.18 304.18 GP-56TL52 San Francisco - Calgary 149.00 88.13 237.13 GP-56TL4N San Francisco - Vancouver 101.00 76.56 177.56 GP-56TL4P Seattle - Toronto 210.00 91.38 301.38 GP-56TL54 Seattle - Vancouver 70.00 74.24 144.24 GP-56TL6U Washington(DCA) - Toronto 136.00 85.83 221.83 DL-56VRN7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- For Car & Hotel specials, click here: <a href=http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/carhotel.html> http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/carhotel.html</a> Delta Hotels & Resorts Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Doubletree Hotels, Embassy Suites Hotels Marriott Hotels Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Westin, Sheraton, St. Regis, Four Points by Sheraton & W Hotels Holiday Inn Radisson Hotels Budget Canada Hertz Avis Thrifty --------------------------------------------------------------------- <A HREF="http://www.aircanada.ca"> <IMG SRC="http://www.aircanada.ca/images/main/000.gif" ALT="Air Canada Logo" WIDTH="240" HEIGHT="40" BORDER="0"></A> ________________________________________ Air Canada - <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca"> http://www.aircanada.ca</a> <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html"> <b>Subscribe/Unsubscribe ... http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/direct.html</b> </a> <a href="http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html"> GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS ... http://www.aircanada.ca/websaver/conditions.html</a> </pre></font></body></html>
zufferli-j/deleted_items/12.
<14599580.1075842024643.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Currency
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-24T22:31:37Z
Let's forget comp and evaluation for a minute. What is rational? We also need to try to define currency exposure. I will try to call you tomorrow.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/120.
<25138329.1075842024667.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Revised - Telephone conference (Kitagawa, Fallon, Zufferli) Re: DPR for Calgary (Calgary to initiate call)
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-24T20:32:00Z
When: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:30 PM-4:30 PM (GMT-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada). Where: Meeting Room #2 *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
zufferli-j/deleted_items/121.
<16048952.1075842024694.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Canada Commercial Hardcount (20)
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-23T22:22:36Z
Guys, its getting late in the day and I feel we need to let people know where they stand. Please sit down with each of your direct reports and let them know that they will be receiving an offer of employment from UBS (hopefully by tommorrow). With respect to Fabian and Gerry, I think its important to stress that although they didnt make the first cut, there is still a high probability of being offered UBS employment following the results of round one. -----Original Message----- From: Milnthorp, Rob Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:47 AM To: Slone, Jeanie Subject: Canada Commercial Hardcount (20) Zufferli Cowan Clark Dorland, C. Draper Lambie Richey Watt Tripp Brodeur Milnthorp Davies Le Dain Biever Drozdiak Sangwine McPhee Lalani Burnham Oh
zufferli-j/deleted_items/122.
<24228255.1075842024716.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
"less busy" Head Trip flyer
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-01-22T00:59:41Z
Howdy! Here's a better "less busy" flyer to share with all the snow riders you know! Thanx. Smith :) - head trip flyer_2002.doc
zufferli-j/deleted_items/123.
<21255957.1075842024740.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Username and Password for GFInet
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2001-12-13T19:49:21Z
Dear John, Here are your login details for GFInet Enspace. Username: jzufferli Password: gfinet The website can be accessed directly from this link: http://energy.gfinet.com If you have any problems please do not hesitate to contact either Kevin or myself. My number is 212-968-2752. Regards Ben Sturgeon *************************************************************** Confidentiality note: This e-mail contains information from the GFI Group Inc. and/or its affiliates, including GFInet inc., that is confidential and/or legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named on this e-mail. This e-mail and its content may not be reproduced or retransmitted without the express written permission of The GFI Group. ***************************************************************
zufferli-j/deleted_items/124.
<2994706.1075842020894.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Vacation Requested By Ian Cooke
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-06T00:24:09Z
Requester: Ian Cooke Request Type: Vacation Request Submitted: 2/5/2002 5:22:36 PM Start Date: 2/19/2002 8:00:00 AM End Date: 2/21/2002 8:00:00 AM Length Requested: 16 Hours Days Submitted: 2 Day(s) Comments: Please click on either the Approve or Reject button at the top of this message. If you don't see them, fully open the message.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/13.
<392047.1075842020918.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Friday Off Requested By Ian Cooke
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-06T00:23:35Z
Requester: Ian Cooke Request Type: Friday Off Request Submitted: 2/5/2002 5:22:02 PM Start Date: 2/15/2002 8:00:00 AM End Date: 2/16/2002 8:00:00 AM Length Requested: 8 Hours Days Submitted: 1 Day(s) Comments: Please click on either the Approve or Reject button at the top of this message. If you don't see them, fully open the message.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/14.
<12468936.1075842020941.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Psychology and Sports; Unlocking the Key to Superior Athletic Performance
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T23:38:08Z
[IMAGE] If you would like to be removed from our email list, please click or go to: http://www.questia.com/remove and provide your email address. [IMAGE] Psychology and Sports; Unlocking the Key to Superior Athletic Performance Olympians and their quest for Olympic gold. 17 year-old wunderkinds in golf. Senior citizens successfully completing triathlons. What do all these athletes have in common besides physiological endurance and athletic prowess? They have uncovered the psychological aspects of sports and its effects on athletic performance. Learn about how important the mind is on athletic performance. Read some suggestions below or do your own search. The World's Largest Online Library of Books with content not found anywhere else on the Internet Sports, Games, and Play: Social and Psychological Viewpoints Edited by Jeffrey H. Goldstein Sports in the Lives of Children and Adolescents: Success on the Field and in Life By Robert S. Griffin The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games Edited by K. Anders Ericsson More Paper Topics We keep adding new paper topics every week! Use the ones developed by our academic librarians or use them as thought-starters to brainstorm your own. Complete Books + More Sources = Better Papers + Better Grades Our subscribers state they got better results and wrote better papers using Questia: 8 out of 10 state Questia is better than other Internet sites/sources because it has entire books and journal articles 7 out of 10 state they found information on Questia they couldn't find anywhere else when they needed it 8 out of 10 state they created a better or higher quality paper with Questia. Subscribe and start achieving academic success today! Wishing you success, The Questia Team (c)2002 Questia Media America, Inc. Questia and the Questia (logo) are service marks of Questia Media and its affiliates.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/15.
<17989588.1075842020989.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Please Log Out Tonight
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T23:09:03Z
Pending final Legal approval, the migration of user accounts for the UBS Warburg Energy users will commence at 7:00 PM. In order to ensure the migration is successful, it is essential that all users logout of the network no later than 7:00 PM. More details about the migration plan, C:, H: and I: drive information will be emailed to all UBSWE users. Included in this should be information on Email retention and migration. If you have any questions, please call IT Support @ 6901 Thank you, and please remember to logout.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/16.
<25585679.1075842021018.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Commercial Re-start Sub-Committee
2002-02-05T23:08:44Z
Following this morning's meeting, we have agreed to have a fifteen minute conference call on a Thursday morning to give a quick update of issues. Chris Calger will ensure a list of progress is circulated prior to the two calls. For those of you cc:d on this. Please feel free to join any of the calls to catch up on progress we are making with getting contracts in place. Liz Taylor will redistribute the conference call numbers for Tuesday and Thursday. Thanks Louise
zufferli-j/deleted_items/17.
<18468163.1075842021043.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
EOL - Multiple Trading Books (URGENT)
2002-02-05T22:47:04Z
Tim and John, I wanted to touch base with you regarding a problem that we have run into between EOL and a trader having multiple trading books. EOL has been set up to have a trader associated with one and only one trading book in the stack manager. As a result, when creating the interface between EOL and Enpower we can cannot assign multiple trading books to one person. David Poston in the Enpower IT support group in Houston has been working with the EOL group and has come up with a solution. 1. If you definitely plan to be trading on EOL for all trading books associated with your name, EOL IT can define certain products to each trading book. If this is the approach that you would like to take, I will need a list of what products you want to trade and to which trading book they are affiliated with. 2. The other option is that you will just use one trading book under your name. If that is the case, no changes will have to be made. If the plan is to use the first option, please let me know so we can make the changes and do the necessary testing on this. John
zufferli-j/deleted_items/18.
<15931240.1075842021066.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Vacation Requested By Michael Taylor
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T22:19:29Z
Requester: Michael Taylor Request Type: Vacation Request Submitted: 2/5/2002 3:17:56 PM Start Date: 2/7/2002 8:00:00 AM End Date: 2/8/2002 8:00:00 AM Length Requested: 8 Hours Days Submitted: 1 Day(s) Comments: Please click on either the Approve or Reject button at the top of this message. If you don't see them, fully open the message.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/19.
<17957512.1075842020478.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Canadian Originators
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-06T17:42:24Z
John, Please provide the list of Canadian Originators. Thank you, Stephanie Sever 713-853-3465
zufferli-j/deleted_items/2.
<25543654.1075842021090.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Friday Off Requested By Michael Taylor
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T22:19:08Z
Requester: Michael Taylor Request Type: Friday Off Request Submitted: 2/5/2002 3:17:35 PM Start Date: 2/8/2002 8:00:00 AM End Date: 2/9/2002 8:00:00 AM Length Requested: 8 Hours Days Submitted: 1 Day(s) Comments: Please click on either the Approve or Reject button at the top of this message. If you don't see them, fully open the message.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/20.
<16791282.1075842021114.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Friday Off Requested By Ian Cooke
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T21:53:16Z
Requester: Ian Cooke Request Type: Friday Off Request Submitted: 2/5/2002 2:51:43 PM Start Date: 2/8/2002 8:00:00 AM End Date: 2/9/2002 8:00:00 AM Length Requested: 8 Hours Days Submitted: 1 Day(s) Comments: Please click on either the Approve or Reject button at the top of this message. If you don't see them, fully open the message.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/21.
<18319604.1075842021139.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
RE: Market Risk Meeting Today - John Zufferli
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T19:12:07Z
Conference room ECS06106 has been reserved for Houston participants. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:55 AM To: Zufferli, John; Gorny, Vladimir; Hayden, Frank; [email protected]; Gil, Mercy Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Market Risk Meeting Today - John Zufferli Importance: High Hi. The Market Risk Meeting has been scheduled for today at 5:15 p.m. Houston Time. The dial in information is as follows: Dial In Number: 203-719-0070 Freephone within the U.S.: 877-315-5218 Pin Number: 808787 Mercy, please reserve a conference room for those participants in Houston. Thanks. jm Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
zufferli-j/deleted_items/22.
<2126255.1075842021163.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Expense Reports
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T17:06:41Z
In anticipation of the imminent closing of the UBSW Energy transaction, please have all outstanding employee expenses in your possession filed through Enron's XMS system as soon as possible. Note to approvers - please approve these expense reports quickly. Enron will process and pay all pre-closing expenses. After transaction closing, payments for expenses submitted before closing (and put into Enron's XMS system) will be sent to your last known address or direct deposited into your account. Enron has committed to processing and paying any expenses incurred prior to transaction closing. If not completed this week, pre-closing expenses should be submitted on a hard copy expense report form which will be available at www.enron.com. There will be a series of e-mails coming out over the next few days highlighting the Travel & Entertainment policies of UBSW Energy and the procedures for processing and payment. If you have any questions, please contact Hope Vargas (3-5280) or Georganne Hodges (3-0430).
zufferli-j/deleted_items/23.
<513215.1075842021186.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Canadian Contracts
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T15:40:51Z
John, I'm hearing rumblings from Whalley and others that UBS may want to pick up Canadian service contracts from the Estate. Can you give me download of these deals? (high level summary) Thanks Frank
zufferli-j/deleted_items/24.
<2125464.1075842021216.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Syncrasy Daily Trader Summary for Tue, Feb 05, 2002
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T15:31:14Z
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE] Syncrasy, LLC? 713.228.8470 Off 713.228.4147 Fax 909 Texas Avenue Suite 1314 Houston, TX 77002 www.syncrasy.com Sales: 713.228.4407 Development Offices: 970.247.4139 Off 970.247.7951 Fax 835 Main Avenue Suite 221 Durango, CO 81301 [IMAGE] Complimentary version of Trader Summary from Syncrasy, LLC and APB Energy Inc. - If you would like to receive this product early in the morning please call Syncrasy at 713 228 4407 for more information or send an email to [email protected] - If you would like to be added to this daily email list please send an email to [email protected] - If you would like to be removed from this daily email please reply to this email with the words "CANCEL" or send an email to [email protected] Data last updated: Tuesday, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:07AM EST Commentary last updated: Tuesday, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:08AM EST Meteorologist: Andy Weingarten... APB Energy / True Quote Congratulations Andy Weingarten, APB Energy! Winner of the $50,000 Winter 2000-01 AQUILA/AMS Seasonal Forecasting Competition. For more information please visit: AMS or Aquila New! >> Printable PDF Trader Summary (You must have Adobe Acrobat Reader to open or print a PDF) Click here for a definition of 'Average-Daily Maximum Temperature' Today: Tuesday, February 5, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 33 -2 ERCOT(SP) 46 +1 FRCC(SE) 64 NC MAAC(NE) 35 -1 MAIN(CTR) 32 -3 MAPP(HP) 32 +1 NPCC(NE) 25 +1 SERC(SE) 43 NC SPP(SP) 36 NC WSCC(NW) 40 -2 WSCC(RK) 34 NC WSCC(SW) 58 NC Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 28 32 25 38 26 46 44 52 Max 34 39 30 41 34 49 46 57 Min 25 26 20 35 17 43 41 49 Range 9 13 10 6 17 6 5 8 StD-P 2.6 3.1 2.5 1.9 4.8 1.7 1.1 2.3 Count 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 1-5 Discussion: There is still no true arctic air in the pattern, but the Southern jet stream is active for storms and the trend is certainly colder than recent weeks. We have seen a definitive change in the weather pattern from last month. January on the whole featured the strong ridge and unseasonable warmth in the Eastern U.S. while the West had a trough and occasional record breaking cold. If you smooth out the maps, we will see in general a reversal over the next two weeks with a trough in the East and Ridge in the West. I still don't see any highlight making cold with this trough, but a "cold and stormy" projection does not seem unreasonable for the East. We have this morning a storm in the South that will bring snow to Oklahoma and NW Texas today with rain farther South. It will track towards the SE U.S. coast through Th! ursday then appears to move out to sea. The Interior SE may see some light to moderate snow with this, but otherwise will be a rainmaker. This should be the most significant weather maker in the short term. The coldest of the air in the short term covers the Eastern U.S. right now. This should start modifying although only in a gradual sense through the rest of the week. Tomorrow: Wednesday, February 6, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 39 +1 ERCOT(SP) 49 -4 FRCC(SE) 72 NC MAAC(NE) 42 +1 MAIN(CTR) 37 +2 MAPP(HP) 38 +3 NPCC(NE) 31 +3 SERC(SE) 44 NC SPP(SP) 39 -2 WSCC(NW) 43 +1 WSCC(RK) 38 +1 WSCC(SW) 58 NC Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 34 36 28 40 32 50 45 54 Max 42 45 35 43 39 52 49 58 Min 31 29 25 36 25 48 40 50 Range 11 16 10 7 14 4 9 8 StD-P 2.3 3.6 2.9 2.1 4.1 0.8 2.2 2.4 Count 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 3: Thursday, February 7, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 42 +3 ERCOT(SP) 60 -1 FRCC(SE) 73 +3 MAAC(NE) 46 +5 MAIN(CTR) 41 +5 MAPP(HP) 38 +9 NPCC(NE) 33 +4 SERC(SE) 49 -2 SPP(SP) 50 -1 WSCC(NW) 43 NC WSCC(RK) 42 +2 WSCC(SW) 60 NC Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 34 37 34 39 36 51 50 55 Max 40 43 39 44 42 54 57 60 Min 30 32 31 36 29 49 45 51 Range 10 11 8 8 13 5 12 9 StD-P 2.9 3.5 1.7 2.9 3.8 1.2 3.8 2.4 Count 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 4: Friday, February 8, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 44 +9 ERCOT(SP) 64 -1 FRCC(SE) 68 -1 MAAC(NE) 47 +5 MAIN(CTR) 42 +12 MAPP(HP) 39 +13 NPCC(NE) 35 +3 SERC(SE) 58 +2 SPP(SP) 55 +3 WSCC(NW) 44 NC WSCC(RK) 43 +2 WSCC(SW) 62 +1 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 36 38 34 40 35 53 56 57 Max 41 43 39 44 44 60 62 62 Min 31 34 28 34 29 48 51 53 Range 10 9 11 10 15 12 11 9 StD-P 2.1 3.3 2.8 2.9 4.8 2.9 2.4 2.0 Count 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 5: Saturday, February 9, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 44 +8 ERCOT(SP) 65 -2 FRCC(SE) 70 -1 MAAC(NE) 48 +9 MAIN(CTR) 38 +3 MAPP(HP) 32 NC NPCC(NE) 38 +10 SERC(SE) 60 +3 SPP(SP) 51 -4 WSCC(NW) 45 +3 WSCC(RK) 39 -2 WSCC(SW) 65 +3 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 35 36 37 43 35 56 55 60 Max 39 42 41 47 43 62 61 64 Min 31 31 28 36 25 51 51 55 Range 8 11 13 11 18 11 10 9 StD-P 2.8 3.0 2.3 2.1 4.7 2.9 3.9 2.0 Count 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 6-10 Discussion: The same threats and questions raised yesterday in the 6-10 day outlook still apply today. The Canadian and European schemes still look sharper with the western ridge and eastern trough than their American counterpart. The correct forecast up to now most of the time was to go with the warmer solution. This time I am running with the colder one. The Canadian model has been consistent with a stronger Eastern trough since the middle of last week. It brings a moderate batch of arctic air next week into the Eastern U.S. The potential of some sort of East coast storm also remains in this pattern. I am not by any means forecasting any brutal cold, but I am going against yesterdays NWS 6-10 and 8-4 day outlooks which are above normal in the Eastern U.S. I believe most of the region will grade out slightly below normal instead while th! e West is in a moderating phase. Day 6: Sunday, February 10, 2002 Click Here for Syncrasy's 6-10 summary information. Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 39 -2 ERCOT(SP) 64 -4 FRCC(SE) 70 -4 MAAC(NE) 46 +4 MAIN(CTR) 37 NC MAPP(HP) 33 +4 NPCC(NE) 40 +12 SERC(SE) 56 -4 SPP(SP) 54 +1 WSCC(NW) 44 +3 WSCC(RK) 44 +6 WSCC(SW) 63 +3 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 33 40 38 40 40 53 55 60 Max 36 45 42 45 46 60 61 64 Min 28 35 33 36 32 48 48 55 Range 8 10 9 9 14 12 13 9 StD-P 2.0 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 4.3 4.3 2.4 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 7: Monday, February 11, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 41 +1 ERCOT(SP) 66 -1 FRCC(SE) 70 -5 MAAC(NE) 46 +2 MAIN(CTR) 39 +5 MAPP(HP) 30 +1 NPCC(NE) 37 +3 SERC(SE) 59 -1 SPP(SP) 55 +5 WSCC(NW) 41 -1 WSCC(RK) 38 +4 WSCC(SW) 59 +1 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 36 37 36 37 36 53 59 56 Max 43 41 40 47 47 61 64 64 Min 32 35 28 29 31 46 53 48 Range 11 6 12 18 16 15 11 16 StD-P 3.0 1.7 2.5 5.7 4.9 3.6 2.2 4.9 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 8: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 40 +3 ERCOT(SP) 64 +8 FRCC(SE) 65 -6 MAAC(NE) 46 -5 MAIN(CTR) 36 +10 MAPP(HP) 21 -3 NPCC(NE) 37 -5 SERC(SE) 57 -5 SPP(SP) 47 +13 WSCC(NW) 31 -4 WSCC(RK) 16 -7 WSCC(SW) 44 -4 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 34 33 37 38 29 57 59 53 Max 37 45 45 45 46 62 64 62 Min 32 24 29 29 15 52 55 44 Range 5 21 16 16 31 10 9 18 StD-P 1.2 4.8 3.5 5.1 9.4 1.9 2.1 6.3 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 9: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 41 +10 ERCOT(SP) 47 +1 FRCC(SE) 70 -1 MAAC(NE) 51 +12 MAIN(CTR) 23 -6 MAPP(HP) 21 -12 NPCC(NE) 42 +12 SERC(SE) 58 +4 SPP(SP) 33 -6 WSCC(NW) 32 -5 WSCC(RK) 22 -6 WSCC(SW) 48 -4 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 32 33 37 38 31 58 51 54 Max 40 38 45 46 40 61 63 60 Min 26 25 29 32 21 53 44 48 Range 14 13 16 14 19 8 19 12 StD-P 3.4 4.8 4.0 4.9 7.0 2.4 6.4 4.8 Count 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Day 10: Thursday, February 14, 2002 Syncrasy's Choice: Delta Temp. Volatility Matrix [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE] (Click on image to enlarge) [IMAGE] ECAR(CTR) 25 -8 ERCOT(SP) 51 +1 FRCC(SE) 66 NC MAAC(NE) 48 +16 MAIN(CTR) 27 -8 MAPP(HP) 28 -9 NPCC(NE) 43 +18 SERC(SE) 46 +1 SPP(SP) 41 -4 WSCC(NW) 33 -4 WSCC(RK) 28 -7 WSCC(SW) 49 -5 Range Standard Deviation [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 25 28 34 34 23 49 42 45 Max 27 31 44 37 29 54 49 54 Min 19 22 23 31 12 42 31 38 Range 8 9 21 6 17 12 18 16 StD-P 2.1 2.7 6.8 1.7 5.7 2.8 7.0 5.3 Count 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix Trader Summary is designed around and formatted for the [IMAGE]Plasma displays, RainbowWall? and DataWall? Trader Summary can also be viewed from www.syncrasy.com or www.apbenergy.com or www.truequote.com [IMAGE]
zufferli-j/deleted_items/25.
<20760705.1075842021370.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Counterparties
[ "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]" ]
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T14:44:24Z
Thank you all for being so responsive. I'm still waiting for claims on: Ameren AIG CLECO Colonial ConAgra Dominion Enterprise Chase Noble Cornerstone Occidental Carolina Power and Light Southern Co. Western Gas Resources Anyone? Please let me know by noon today. Thanks again for your help. Jennifer
zufferli-j/deleted_items/26.
<26190676.1075842021394.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
DRAFT: INFORMATION, Please Read: UBSWE Migration postponed
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T02:51:07Z
Due to a variety of circumstances we did not migrate employees to the UBSWE environment tonight (Monday, February 4, 2002). We will communicate further details of the migration plan on Tuesday, February 5, 2002. Thank you for your cooperation in advance, please contact the Resolution Center at x 3-1411 should you have any questions. UBSW Energy Global Infrastructure
zufferli-j/deleted_items/27.
<19657225.1075842021418.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Ken Lay Resigns from Board
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-05T00:56:02Z
Ken Lay announced today that he has resigned from Enron's Board of Directors. His resignation is effective immediately. In a press release, Ken said, "I want to see Enron survive and successfully emerge from reorganization. Due to the multiple inquiries and investigations, some of which are focused on me personally, I believe that my involvement has become a distraction to achieving this goal." He added, "My concern is for current and former Enron employees and other stakeholders, and I feel that it is in their best interest for me to step down from the Board."
zufferli-j/deleted_items/28.
<2048771.1075842021441.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Repairs or Keyboard Trays?
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-04T23:07:45Z
With the recent shuffle of people moving to new desks, I'm sure there will be keyboard trays that need to be moved, as well as some repairs. Wall 2 Wall will be in on Wednesday afternoon to look after this. Please let me know by Wednesday morning if you need anything done. Thanks, Carla
zufferli-j/deleted_items/29.
<23356572.1075842020506.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
YOU HAVE 48 HOURS - Message from Louise Kitchen
[ "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "carla.o'[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]" ]
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-06T17:18:43Z
It appears that the following email may not have been clear. You have to copy all documents yourself. This is my cheat sheet if it helps: H Drives: 1. Each person will have to move any data over personally from the old H drive (which is now Z:) drive to their new H drive. 2. The Z: drive (old H:) will be removed from UBS employees on Thursday night. O Drives: 1. For the old O or M drives go to O:\ESTATE\ O (or M ? pending location of data) and copy to the new common O. The Estate O and M will be removed from UBS employees on Thursday night. Do not delete anything and only copy information which is complies with the policy. Please make sure that those people who are not in the office are contacted and comply. Louise To: All Enron Employees Transferring to UBS Warburg Energy (or its affiliates) Under the terms of the various agreements among certain Enron entities and UBS AG, certain Enron data and documents may be provided to UBS. To ensure compliance with those agreements, Enron's document retention policy, as well as directives of various investigative agencies, the attached protocol regarding the process for migration of any information or data to UBS has been developed. Please review the protocol carefully. Then, complete the attached Certification and return it, with attachments, to Linda Guinn at EB 3829a no later than February 11, 2002. Questions about this matter may be directed to Michelle Cash at (713) 853-6401 or Francisco Pinto-Leite at (713) 345-7942 . Protocol Document and Data Copy Instructions Certification Document
zufferli-j/deleted_items/3.
<6857748.1075842021465.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Information, Please Read: UBSW Energy Migration
[ "" ]
[ "" ]
2002-02-04T21:43:21Z
Attention UBS Warburg Energy Users: Please be aware that IT will begin migrations to UBSW Energy this evening. Please log off of your machines tonight. When you arrive in the morning, you will login with your Enron ID and password. You will be required to change your password immediately. You will also have an email in your Inbox tomorrow morning explaining your "next steps". If you have any questions, please call 3-1411. Thanks, UBSW Energy Global Infrastructure
zufferli-j/deleted_items/30.