Upload 1123 files
Browse filesThis view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.
See raw diff
- .gitattributes +10 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_a01_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_a11_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_a12_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_a13_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_introduction_en.txt +3 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a02_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a03_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a21_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a22_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a31_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a32_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a33_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b01_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b02_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b11_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b12_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b13_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b21_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b22_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b03_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b04_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b23_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b31_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b32_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b33_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b41_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b42_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b05_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b43_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b44_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b51_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b52_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b53_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b54_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b55_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b06_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b56_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b57_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b61_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b62_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b63_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c01_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c11_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c12_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c13_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c14_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_13_global_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_14_characteristics_en.txt +1 -0
- data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_15_c02_en.txt +1 -0
.gitattributes
CHANGED
@@ -57,3 +57,13 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
57 |
# Video files - compressed
|
58 |
*.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
59 |
*.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
# Video files - compressed
|
58 |
*.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
59 |
*.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
60 |
+
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec_2019_original_report_en.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
61 |
+
data/Giec_2019/fr/Giec_2019_rapport_officiel_fr.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
62 |
+
data/Giec_2020_ocean/en/Giec_2020_ocean_original_report_en.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
63 |
+
data/Giec_2020_ocean/fr/Giec_2020_ocean_rapport_officiel_fr.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
64 |
+
data/Giec_2020/en/Giec_2020_original_report_en.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
65 |
+
data/Giec_2020/fr/Giec_2020_rapport_officiel_fr.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
66 |
+
data/Giec_2021/en/Giec_2021_en.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
67 |
+
data/Giec_2021/fr/Giec_2021_rapport_officiel_fr.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
68 |
+
data/Giec_2022/en/Giec_2022_original_report_en.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
69 |
+
data/Giec_2022/fr/Giec_2022_rapport_non-officiel.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_a01_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence)
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_a11_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Reflecting the long-term warming trend since pre-industrial times, observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) for the decade 2006–2015 was 0.87°C (likely between 0.75°C and 0.99°C) higher than the average over the 1850–1900 period (very high confidence). Estimated anthropogenic global warming matches the level of observed warming to within ±20% (likely range). Estimated anthropogenic global warming is currently increasing at 0.2°C (likely between 0.1°C and 0.3°C) per decade due to past and ongoing emissions (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_a12_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Warming greater than the global annual average is being experienced in many land regions and seasons, including two to three times higher in the Arctic. Warming is generally higher over land than over the ocean. (high confidence)
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_a13_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence). This assessment is based on several lines of evidence, including attribution studies for changes in extremes since 1950.
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_04_introduction_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
This Report responds to the invitation for IPCC ‘... to provide a Special Report in 2018 on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways' contained in the Decision of the 21st Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to adopt the Paris Agreement.
|
2 |
+
The IPCC accepted the invitation in April 2016, deciding to prepare this Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
|
3 |
+
This Summary for Policymakers (SPM) presents the key findings of the Special Report, based on the assessment of the available scientific, technical and socio-economic literature relevant to global warming of 1.5°C and for the comparison between global warming of 1.5°C and 2°C above pre-industrial levels. The level of confidence associated with each key finding is reported using the IPCC calibrated language. The underlying scientific basis of each key finding is indicated by references provided to chapter elements. In the SPM, knowledge gaps are identified associated with the underlying chapters of the Report.
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a02_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Warming from anthropogenic emissions from the pre-industrial period to the present will persist for centuries to millennia and will continue to cause further long-term changes in the climate system, such as sea level rise, with associated impacts (high confidence), but these emissions alone are unlikely to cause global warming of 1.5°C (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a03_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Climate-related risks for natural and human systems are higher for global warming of 1.5°C than at present, but lower than at 2°C (high confidence). These risks depend on the magnitude and rate of warming, geographic location, levels of development and vulnerability, and on the choices and implementation of adaptation and mitigation options (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a21_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Anthropogenic emissions (including greenhouse gases, aerosols and their precursors) up to the present are unlikely to cause further warming of more than 0.5°C over the next two to three decades (high confidence) or on a century time scale (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a22_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Reaching and sustaining net zero global anthropogenic CO2 emissions and declining net non-CO2 radiative forcing would halt anthropogenic global warming on multi-decadal time scales (high confidence). The maximum temperature reached is then determined by cumulative net global anthropogenic CO2 emissions up to the time of net zero CO2 emissions (high confidence) and the level of non-CO2 radiative forcing in the decades prior to the time that maximum temperatures are reached (medium confidence). On longer time scales, sustained net negative global anthropogenic CO2 emissions and/or further reductions in non-CO2 radiative forcing may still be required to prevent further warming due to Earth system feedbacks and to reverse ocean acidification (medium confidence) and will be required to minimize sea level rise (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a31_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Impacts on natural and human systems from global warming have already been observed (high confidence). Many land and ocean ecosystems and some of the services they provide have already changed due to global warming (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a32_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Future climate-related risks depend on the rate, peak and duration of warming. In the aggregate, they are larger if global warming exceeds 1.5°C before returning to that level by 2100 than if global warming gradually stabilizes at 1.5°C, especially if the peak temperature is high (e.g., about 2°C) (high confidence). Some impacts may be long-lasting or irreversible, such as the loss of some ecosystems (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_05_a33_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Adaptation and mitigation are already occurring (high confidence). Future climate-related risks would be reduced by the upscaling and acceleration of far-reaching, multilevel and cross-sectoral climate mitigation and by both incremental and transformational adaptation (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b01_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Climate models project robust differences in regional climate characteristics between present-day and global warming of 1.5°C, and between 1.5°C and 2°C. These differences include increases in: mean temperature in most land and ocean regions (high confidence), hot extremes in most inhabited regions (high confidence), heavy precipitation in several regions (medium confidence), and the probability of drought and precipitation deficits in some regions (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b02_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
By 2100, global mean sea level rise is projected to be around 0.1 metre lower with global warming of 1.5°C compared to 2°C (medium confidence). Sea level will continue to rise well beyond 2100 (high confidence), and the magnitude and rate of this rise depend on future emission pathways. A slower rate of sea level rise enables greater opportunities for adaptation in the human and ecological systems of small islands, low-lying coastal areas and deltas (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b11_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Evidence from attributed changes in some climate and weather extremes for a global warming of about 0.5°C supports the assessment that an additional 0.5°C of warming compared to present is associated with further detectable changes in these extremes (medium confidence). Several regional changes in climate are assessed to occur with global warming up to 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels, including warming of extreme temperatures in many regions (high confidence), increases in frequency, intensity, and/or amount of heavy precipitation in several regions (high confidence), and an increase in intensity or frequency of droughts in some regions (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b12_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Temperature extremes on land are projected to warm more than GMST (high confidence): extreme hot days in mid-latitudes warm by up to about 3°C at global warming of 1.5°C and about 4°C at 2°C, and extreme cold nights in high latitudes warm by up to about 4.5°C at 1.5°C and about 6°C at 2°C (high confidence). The number of hot days is projected to increase in most land regions, with highest increases in the tropics (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b13_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Risks from droughts and precipitation deficits are projected to be higher at 2°C compared to 1.5°C of global warming in some regions (medium confidence). Risks from heavy precipitation events are projected to be higher at 2°C compared to 1.5°C of global warming in several northern hemisphere high-latitude and/or high-elevation regions, eastern Asia and eastern North America (medium confidence). Heavy precipitation associated with tropical cyclones is projected to be higher at 2°C compared to 1.5°C global warming (medium confidence). There is generally low confidence in projected changes in heavy precipitation at 2°C compared to 1.5°C in other regions. Heavy precipitation when aggregated at global scale is projected to be higher at 2°C than at 1.5°C of global warming (medium confidence). As a consequence of heavy precipitation, the fraction of the global land area affected by flood hazards is projected to be larger at 2°C compared to 1.5°C of global warming (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b21_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Model-based projections of global mean sea level rise (relative to 1986–2005) suggest an indicative range of 0.26 to 0.77 m by 2100 for 1.5°C of global warming, 0.1 m (0.04–0.16 m) less than for a global warming of 2°C (medium confidence). A reduction of 0.1 m in global sea level rise implies that up to 10 million fewer people would be exposed to related risks, based on population in the year 2010 and assuming no adaptation (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_07_b22_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Sea level rise will continue beyond 2100 even if global warming is limited to 1.5°C in the 21st century (high confidence). Marine ice sheet instability in Antarctica and/or irreversible loss of the Greenland ice sheet could result in multi-metre rise in sea level over hundreds to thousands of years. These instabilities could be triggered at around 1.5°C to 2°C of global warming (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b03_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
On land, impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems, including species loss and extinction, are projected to be lower at 1.5°C of global warming compared to 2°C. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared to 2°C is projected to lower the impacts on terrestrial, freshwater and coastal ecosystems and to retain more of their services to humans (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b04_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared to 2°C is projected to reduce increases in ocean temperature as well as associated increases in ocean acidity and decreases in ocean oxygen levels (high confidence). Consequently, limiting global warming to 1.5°C is projected to reduce risks to marine biodiversity, fisheries, and ecosystems, and their functions and services to humans, as illustrated by recent changes to Arctic sea ice and warm-water coral reef ecosystems (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b23_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Increasing warming amplifies the exposure of small islands, low-lying coastal areas and deltas to the risks associated with sea level rise for many human and ecological systems, including increased saltwater intrusion, flooding and damage to infrastructure (high confidence). Risks associated with sea level rise are higher at 2°C compared to 1.5°C. The slower rate of sea level rise at global warming of 1.5°C reduces these risks, enabling greater opportunities for adaptation including managing and restoring natural coastal ecosystems and infrastructure reinforcement (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b31_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Of 105,000 species studied, 6% of insects, 8% of plants and 4% of vertebrates are projected to lose over half of their climatically determined geographic range for global warming of 1.5°C, compared with 18% of insects, 16% of plants and 8% of vertebrates for global warming of 2°C (medium confidence). Impacts associated with other biodiversity-related risks such as forest fires and the spread of invasive species are lower at 1.5°C compared to 2°C of global warming (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b32_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Approximately 4% (interquartile range 2–7%) of the global terrestrial land area is projected to undergo a transformation of ecosystems from one type to another at 1°C of global warming, compared with 13% (interquartile range 8–20%) at 2°C (medium confidence). This indicates that the area at risk is projected to be approximately 50% lower at 1.5°C compared to 2°C (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b33_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
High-latitude tundra and boreal forests are particularly at risk of climate change-induced degradation and loss, with woody shrubs already encroaching into the tundra (high confidence) and this will proceed with further warming. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C rather than 2°C is projected to prevent the thawing over centuries of a permafrost area in the range of 1.5 to 2.5 million km2 (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b41_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
There is high confidence that the probability of a sea ice-free Arctic Ocean during summer is substantially lower at global warming of 1.5°C when compared to 2°C. With 1.5°C of global warming, one sea ice-free Arctic summer is projected per century. This likelihood is increased to at least one per decade with 2°C global warming. Effects of a temperature overshoot are reversible for Arctic sea ice cover on decadal time scales (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_08_b42_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Global warming of 1.5°C is projected to shift the ranges of many marine species to higher latitudes as well as increase the amount of damage to many ecosystems. It is also expected to drive the loss of coastal resources and reduce the productivity of fisheries and aquaculture (especially at low latitudes). The risks of climate-induced impacts are projected to be higher at 2°C than those at global warming of 1.5°C (high confidence). Coral reefs, for example, are projected to decline by a further 70–90% at 1.5°C (high confidence) with larger losses (>99%) at 2°C (very high confidence). The risk of irreversible loss of many marine and coastal ecosystems increases with global warming, especially at 2°C or more (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b05_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Climate-related risks to health, livelihoods, food security, water supply, human security, and economic growth are projected to increase with global warming of 1.5°C and increase further with 2°C.
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b43_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
The level of ocean acidification due to increasing CO2 concentrations associated with global warming of 1.5°C is projected to amplify the adverse effects of warming, and even further at 2°C, impacting the growth, development, calcification, survival, and thus abundance of a broad range of species, for example, from algae to fish (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b44_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Impacts of climate change in the ocean are increasing risks to fisheries and aquaculture via impacts on the physiology, survivorship, habitat, reproduction, disease incidence, and risk of invasive species (medium confidence) but are projected to be less at 1.5°C of global warming than at 2°C. One global fishery model, for example, projected a decrease in global annual catch for marine fisheries of about 1.5 million tonnes for 1.5°C of global warming compared to a loss of more than 3 million tonnes for 2°C of global warming (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b51_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Populations at disproportionately higher risk of adverse consequences with global warming of 1.5°C and beyond include disadvantaged and vulnerable populations, some indigenous peoples, and local communities dependent on agricultural or coastal livelihoods (high confidence). Regions at disproportionately higher risk include Arctic ecosystems, dryland regions, small island developing states, and Least Developed Countries (high confidence). Poverty and disadvantage are expected to increase in some populations as global warming increases; limiting global warming to 1.5°C, compared with 2°C, could reduce the number of people both exposed to climate-related risks and susceptible to poverty by up to several hundred million by 2050 (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b52_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Any increase in global warming is projected to affect human health, with primarily negative consequences (high confidence). Lower risks are projected at 1.5°C than at 2°C for heat-related morbidity and mortality (very high confidence) and for ozone-related mortality if emissions needed for ozone formation remain high (high confidence). Urban heat islands often amplify the impacts of heatwaves in cities (high confidence). Risks from some vector-borne diseases, such as malaria and dengue fever, are projected to increase with warming from 1.5°C to 2°C, including potential shifts in their geographic range (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b53_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Limiting warming to 1.5°C compared with 2°C is projected to result in smaller net reductions in yields of maize, rice, wheat, and potentially other cereal crops, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central and South America, and in the CO2-dependent nutritional quality of rice and wheat (high confidence). Reductions in projected food availability are larger at 2°C than at 1.5°C of global warming in the Sahel, southern Africa, the Mediterranean, central Europe, and the Amazon (medium confidence). Livestock are projected to be adversely affected with rising temperatures, depending on the extent of changes in feed quality, spread of diseases, and water resource availability (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b54_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Depending on future socio-economic conditions, limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared to 2°C may reduce the proportion of the world population exposed to a climate change-induced increase in water stress by up to 50%, although there is considerable variability between regions (medium confidence). Many small island developing states could experience lower water stress as a result of projected changes in aridity when global warming is limited to 1.5°C, as compared to 2°C (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_09_b55_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Risks to global aggregated economic growth due to climate change impacts are projected to be lower at 1.5°C than at 2°C by the end of this century (medium confidence). This excludes the costs of mitigation, adaptation investments and the benefits of adaptation. Countries in the tropics and Southern Hemisphere subtropics are projected to experience the largest impacts on economic growth due to climate change should global warming increase from 1.5°C to 2°C (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b06_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Most adaptation needs will be lower for global warming of 1.5°C compared to 2°C (high confidence). There are a wide range of adaptation options that can reduce the risks of climate change (high confidence). There are limits to adaptation and adaptive capacity for some human and natural systems at global warming of 1.5°C, with associated losses (medium confidence). The number and availability of adaptation options vary by sector (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b56_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Exposure to multiple and compound climate-related risks increases between 1.5°C and 2°C of global warming, with greater proportions of people both so exposed and susceptible to poverty in Africa and Asia (high confidence). For global warming from 1.5°C to 2°C, risks across energy, food, and water sectors could overlap spatially and temporally, creating new and exacerbating current hazards, exposures, and vulnerabilities that could affect increasing numbers of people and regions (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b57_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
There are multiple lines of evidence that since AR5 the assessed levels of risk increased for four of the five Reasons for Concern (RFCs) for global warming to 2°C (high confidence). The risk transitions by degrees of global warming are now: from high to very high risk between 1.5°C and 2°C for RFC1 (Unique and threatened systems) (high confidence); from moderate to high risk between 1°C and 1.5°C for RFC2 (Extreme weather events) (medium confidence); from moderate to high risk between 1.5°C and 2°C for RFC3 (Distribution of impacts) (high confidence); from moderate to high risk between 1.5°C and 2.5°C for RFC4 (Global aggregate impacts) (medium confidence); and from moderate to high risk between 1°C and 2.5°C for RFC5 (Large-scale singular events) (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b61_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
A wide range of adaptation options are available to reduce the risks to natural and managed ecosystems (e.g., ecosystem-based adaptation, ecosystem restoration and avoided degradation and deforestation, biodiversity management, sustainable aquaculture, and local knowledge and indigenous knowledge), the risks of sea level rise (e.g., coastal defence and hardening), and the risks to health, livelihoods, food, water, and economic growth, especially in rural landscapes (e.g., efficient irrigation, social safety nets, disaster risk management, risk spreading and sharing, and community-based adaptation) and urban areas (e.g., green infrastructure, sustainable land use and planning, and sustainable water management) (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b62_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Adaptation is expected to be more challenging for ecosystems, food and health systems at 2°C of global warming than for 1.5°C (medium confidence). Some vulnerable regions, including small islands and Least Developed Countries, are projected to experience high multiple interrelated climate risks even at global warming of 1.5°C (high confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_10_b63_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Limits to adaptive capacity exist at 1.5°C of global warming, become more pronounced at higher levels of warming and vary by sector, with site-specific implications for vulnerable regions, ecosystems and human health (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c01_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
In model pathways with no or limited overshoot of 1.5°C, global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030 (40–60% interquartile range), reaching net zero around 2050 (2045–2055 interquartile range). For limiting global warming to below 2°C CO2 emissions are projected to decline by about 25% by 2030 in most pathways (10–30% interquartile range) and reach net zero around 2070 (2065–2080 interquartile range). Non-CO2 emissions in pathways that limit global warming to 1.5°C show deep reductions that are similar to those in pathways limiting warming to 2°C. (high confidence)
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c11_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
CO2 emissions reductions that limit global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot can involve different portfolios of mitigation measures, striking different balances between lowering energy and resource intensity, rate of decarbonization, and the reliance on carbon dioxide removal. Different portfolios face different implementation challenges and potential synergies and trade-offs with sustainable development. (high confidence)
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c12_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Modelled pathways that limit global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot involve deep reductions in emissions of methane and black carbon (35% or more of both by 2050 relative to 2010). These pathways also reduce most of the cooling aerosols, which partially offsets mitigation effects for two to three decades. Non-CO2 emissions can be reduced as a result of broad mitigation measures in the energy sector. In addition, targeted non-CO2 mitigation measures can reduce nitrous oxide and methane from agriculture, methane from the waste sector, some sources of black carbon, and hydrofluorocarbons. High bioenergy demand can increase emissions of nitrous oxide in some 1.5°C pathways, highlighting the importance of appropriate management approaches. Improved air quality resulting from projected reductions in many non-CO2 emissions provide direct and immediate population health benefits in all 1.5°C model pathways. (high confidence)
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c13_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Limiting global warming requires limiting the total cumulative global anthropogenic emissions of CO2 since the pre-industrial period, that is, staying within a total carbon budget (high confidence). By the end of 2017, anthropogenic CO2 emissions since the pre-industrial period are estimated to have reduced the total carbon budget for 1.5°C by approximately 2200 ± 320 GtCO2 (medium confidence). The associated remaining budget is being depleted by current emissions of 42 ± 3 GtCO2 per year (high confidence). The choice of the measure of global temperature affects the estimated remaining carbon budget. Using global mean surface air temperature, as in AR5, gives an estimate of the remaining carbon budget of 580 GtCO2 for a 50% probability of limiting warming to 1.5°C, and 420 GtCO2 for a 66% probability (medium confidence). Alternatively, using GMST gives estimates of 770 and 570 GtCO2, for 50% and 66% probabilities, respectively (medium confidence). Uncertainties in the size of these estimated remaining carbon budgets are substantial and depend on several factors. Uncertainties in the climate response to CO2 and non-CO2 emissions contribute ±400 GtCO2 and the level of historic warming contributes ±250 GtCO2 (medium confidence). Potential additional carbon release from future permafrost thawing and methane release from wetlands would reduce budgets by up to 100 GtCO2 over the course of this century and more thereafter (medium confidence). In addition, the level of non-CO2 mitigation in the future could alter the remaining carbon budget by 250 GtCO2 in either direction (medium confidence).
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_12_c14_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Solar radiation modification (SRM) measures are not included in any of the available assessed pathways. Although some SRM measures may be theoretically effective in reducing an overshoot, they face large uncertainties and knowledge gaps as well as substantial risks and institutional and social constraints to deployment related to governance, ethics, and impacts on sustainable development. They also do not mitigate ocean acidification. (medium confidence)
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_13_global_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
General characteristics of the evolution of anthropogenic net emissions of CO2, and total emissions of methane, black carbon, and nitrous oxide in model pathways that limit global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot. Net emissions are defined as anthropogenic emissions reduced by anthropogenic removals. Reductions in net emissions can be achieved through different portfolios of mitigation measures illustrated in Figure SPM.3b.
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_14_characteristics_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Different mitigation strategies can achieve the net emissions reductions that would be required to follow a pathway that limits global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot. All pathways use Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), but the amount varies across pathways, as do the relative contributions of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) and removals in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector. This has implications for emissions and several other pathway characteristics.
|
data/Giec_2019/en/Giec-2019_15_c02_en.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Pathways limiting global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot would require rapid and far-reaching transitions in energy, land, urban and infrastructure (including transport and buildings), and industrial systems (high confidence). These systems transitions are unprecedented in terms of scale, but not necessarily in terms of speed, and imply deep emissions reductions in all sectors, a wide portfolio of mitigation options and a significant upscaling of investments in those options (medium confidence).
|