file
stringlengths 10
65
| message
stringlengths 5
2.01M
| Sender
stringlengths 5
112
| Receiver(s)
stringlengths 0
9.83k
| __index_level_0__
int64 0
517k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
allen-p/sent_items/235. | RE: ,
They cannot meet on Saturday. I will probably meet them in Columbus on Monday or Tuesday. I will let you know when.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jeff Smith" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jeff+20Smith+22+20+3Cjsmith+40austintx+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: RE:
Phillip,
I am leaving tomorrow morning. Have you worked out a time to meet the
Kuo's? I can overnight you my check to present to them on Sat. if they have
signed the release.
Let me know what you want to do.
Thanks.
Jeff | 2,269 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/236. | RE: ,
That should be ok. I will give you a call on Tuesday morning. A
Still no word on the Leander closing?
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jeff Smith" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jeff+20Smith+22+20+3Cjsmith+40austintx+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: RE:
I will not return until Monday night. See if they can wait until Tuesday or
Wednesday.
Thanks.
Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE:
>
>
> They cannot meet on Saturday. I will probably meet them in Columbus on
> Monday or Tuesday. I will let you know when.
>
> Phillip
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jeff Smith" <[email protected]>@ENRON
>
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jeff+20Smith+22+20+3Cjsmith+40austintx+2Ecom
> [email protected]]
>
>
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:26 AM
> To: Allen, Phillip K.
> Subject: RE:
>
>
> Phillip,
>
> I am leaving tomorrow morning. Have you worked out a time
> to meet the
> Kuo's? I can overnight you my check to present to them on Sat. if
> they have
> signed the release.
>
> Let me know what you want to do.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material
> for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for
> the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp.
> at [email protected] and delete all copies
> of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
> (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
> other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a
> contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
> | 2,270 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/237. | ,
Jacques,
I sent you a fax of Kevin Kolb's comments on the release. The payoff on the note would be $36,248 ($36090(principal) + $158 (accrued interest)).
This is assuming we wrap this up on Tuesday.
Please email to confirm that their changes are ok so I can set up a meeting on Tuesday to reach closure.
Phillip | 2,271 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/238. | FW: ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:11 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject:
Jacques,
I sent you a fax of Kevin Kolb's comments on the release. The payoff on the note would be $36,248 ($36090(principal) + $158 (accrued interest)).
This is assuming we wrap this up on Tuesday.
Please email to confirm that their changes are ok so I can set up a meeting on Tuesday to reach closure.
Phillip | 2,272 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/239. | ,
Mac,
The IRS address for estimated payments is: PO Box 970001; St. Louis, MO 63197-0001
Keith
PS: Please confirm receipt of this message. | 2,273 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/24. | FW: Wildflower, Rayburn, Emilie apts ,
-----Original Message-----
From: "JEFF SMITH" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:07 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: FW: Wildflower, Rayburn, Emilie apts
Three more deals in San Antonio.
- emilie onsale.doc
- rayburn onsale.doc
- wildflower onsale.doc | 2,274 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/240. | RE: FW: ,
Jacques,
Once you make the changes to the release, please fax a copy to Kevin Kolb. I am going to try and meet Pauline Kuo on Tuesday or Wednesday to wrap things up. In addition to the release, I will need the guarantee and a release of lien for the smaller note. I will speak to you on Monday. Hope things are going well with your wife.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Re: FW:
Phillip,
Thanks for the info. The changes are alright. I will make the
revisions and call you. I am at MD Anderson tomorrow morning, so it will
probably be late tomorrow or over the weekend. We will coordinate Monday
morning so I can get you everything you need for the closing. Thanks. Jacques | 2,275 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/241. | RE: Bike Commute ,
That's great. Your guys seem fired up about this program. We need something like this in Houston to boost morale.
It makes me miss Portland.
-----Original Message-----
From: Belden, Tim
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:40 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Bike Commute
Check out this web site. We are competing with all companies in Portland for who can ride the most to work for the month of September. We are going to win. We have about 130 people in the office which produces about 5,000 trips (each way counts as one). This week, we cycled 200+ trips. The winner last year won with 12%. We're going to get 15+%. Then we'll shut up those left leaning, Enron bashing Portland people.
http://westpower/BikeCommute/default.asp | 2,276 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/242. | RE: Simulation Common Mistakes ,
Can you send me a schedule of meetings? Is there one today?
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Frolov, Yevgeny; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Simulation Common Mistakes
Phillip,
I have attached a list of the Common Mistakes we have compiled for the Risk
Management Simulation. We thought this would be a good starting point for
our discussion of examples and scenarios at next Tuesday's meeting. Any
stories you have related to these mistakes will be extremely helpful.
During the meeting, we can also get from you the names of anyone else who
might be able to provide us with good examples of these mistakes.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Mery
(See attached file: CM-Enron.xls)
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.
- CM-Enron.xls << File: CM-Enron.xls >> | 2,277 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/243. | ,
Jacques,
Did you get a chance to look at the release? Drop me a note when you can.
Phillip | 2,278 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/244. | RE: ,
Thanks. I am waiting to speak to Pauline Kuo to schedule a time and place to meet her this week. Hopefully we can meet Tuesday or Wednesday. I will swing by your office to pick up the documents.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Re:
Phillip,
I sent you a note that the changes have been made and faxed to Kevin.
Call me to arrange to pick up the originals or have them delivered where you
need them.
Thanks,
Jacques | 2,279 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/245. | ,
Mike,
Can you send me a status update when you get a chance.
Thank you,
Phillip | 2,280 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/246. | RE: Outing Event on Ultra Sailing Yacht set up for Enron/Accenture ,
Yevgeny,
Can you send me a schedule of meetings. I don't know if we have one today or not. I have a doctors appointment this afternoon so I can't make it today.
Phillip
-----Original Appointment-----
From: Frolov, Yevgeny
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:47 AM
To: McDaniel, Kirk; Allen, Phillip K.; Aucoin, Berney C. ; Lewis, Andrew H.; McMichael Jr., Ed; O'rourke, Tim; Quigley, Dutch; Reese, Mark; Arnold, John; Frolov, Yevgeny; Oxley, David; Coleman, Brad; '[email protected]'; Olson, Cindy; Tamez, Elisa; Rangel, Ina; Solis, Melissa
Subject: Outing Event on Ultra Sailing Yacht set up for Enron/Accenture BRM Initiative Team (directions and map attached)
When: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:00 PM-7:00 PM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada); Tijuana.
Where: Ultra Sailing Charters,281-333-2063, 2500 South Shore Blvd, Nassau Bay, Texas 77058
It is time for the Ultra outing event aboard the Ultra Sailing Yacht! We
will have food, drinks, and fun to mark the Enron Risk
Management Simulation Initiative!
For a picture of the boat and more information, click on this link
ULTRA website http://home.flash.net/~ultratri/
Plan to attend September 13th: Boarding 5:30-6:00PM
(Don't be late the boat may sail!!!)
Sailing, dinner, drinks 6:00-9/10:00 PM.
Requirements: Bring your fun and significant others (one guest please)
DO NOT BRING/WEAR: mid to high heeled shoes, black soled tennis shoes, glass or bottles, cigars
Location: Ultra Sailing Charters
2500 South Shore Blvd
Nassau Bay, Texas 77058
281-333-2063
Directions:
(Embedded image moved to file: pic10548.pcx)
Turn East on 518
Turn left on Marina Bay Drive
Turn Left on South Shore Blvd.
Park in the Hotel parking lot on the left.
Look for the Ultra Sailboat.
Picture of the Boat << File: pic10548.pcx >>
<< File: c-boat.jpg >> | 2,281 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/247. | RE: Current Schedule as of 3 pm on Monday ,
Yevgeny,
In light of this mornings events, most of the trading floor is leaving. So we will have to do the meeting tomorrow.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Frolov, Yevgeny
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:55 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Current Schedule as of 3 pm on Monday
Phillip,
Here is the current schedule. You have a meeting tomorrow at 3 pm-5 pm. It will take place in the same room on 18th floor 3 AC
18 << File: Hexagon SME Sign.doc >> | 2,282 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/248. | FW: Competitive Analysis Update #4- US Terrorism Attacks ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnston, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:12 AM
To: Lay, Kenneth; Frevert, Mark; Mcconnell, Mike; Sherriff, John; Brown, Michael - COO London; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise; Seyfried, Bryan; Fiala, Markus; Kinneman, Jeff; Gonzales, Eric; Whitehead, Jonathan; Nowlan Jr., John L.; White, Bill; Schroeder Jr., Don; Maffett, Randal; Sekse, Per; Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim; Heizenrader, Tim; Grigsby, Mike; Allen, Phillip K.; Kaminski, Vince J; Bradley, Michael; Kean, Steven J.; Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Hirl, Joseph; Thirsk, Jeremy; O'Day, Nicholas; Greene, John; Fuller, Robert; Gordon, Michael; Tholan, Scott; Roth, Jim; Fitzsimmons, Brendan; Seigle, Clayton; Whitman, Britt; Aganon, Rommel; Landry, Kimberly; Holman, Kelly; Walsh, Kristin; Turner, Nancy; Lawlor, Dave; Kemp, John; Brindle, John; Cromley, David; Ewald, Laura; Scott, Eric; Reed, Andrea V.; Garner, Bruce
Subject: Competitive Analysis Update #4- US Terrorism Attacks
Importance: High
Report is divided into Market Updates; Transportation/Infrastructure Updates; and Political Updates. For further information, contact:
Robert Johnston x39934
Clay Seigle x31504 (oil/politics)
Brendan Fitzsimmons x34763 (financial markets)
Kelly Holman x39844 (gas/power infrastructure)
A. Market Updates
U.S. Markets
? NYSE and NASDAQ officially closed today. First time NYSE closed on consecutive days since WW2. Equity exchange officials to conference call later today to determine restart.
? NYMEX officially closed today. No new information on restart.
? CBOT and CME officially closed today. No new information on restart.
? The Group of Seven (G-7) major countries are in talks on emergency policy coordination to prevent further turbulence in global financial markets following the terror attacks against the United States. No official word yet on coordinated intervention.
? Lower Manhattan trading infrastructure devastated, but generally backed-up offsite. Clearinghouse Interbank Payment System (CHIP) continues to operate.
? Key World Trade Center losses affect insurance, metals trading, major financial houses. Biggest victims include MSDW, Cantor Fitzgerald, Mizuho Holdings, Bank of America, AON, Lehman Brothers
? Congress to resume budget debate today; new focus on defense and intelligence spending; likely calls for further fiscal stimulus to reassure consumers.
? AGA offices in DC to reopen today. AGA report on weekly storage data scheduled for today.
Japan Overnight
Nikkei ended down 6.6% at 9610; TOPIX down 6.4% at 990.80
Nikkei below 10,000 and lower than Dow for first time since 1950s, now at Dec 1983 levels (w/o accounting for Mar. 2000 tech re-weight); more importantly, the TOPIX went through and closed below 1000 breaking down to early 1998 financial crisis lows.
Citibank market operations "normal," and no problem with settlements today despite evacuation of NY office
Japanese officials report no discussion of FX intervention but that cooperative G-7 intervention available if necessary; BoJ injected Y2 trillion to provide liquidity
Next regular BOJ policy meeting Sept. 18-19.
Europe
? Currency trading is steady, with the dollar holding firm in European trading.
? European bourses experience volatility, but drift into negative territory on thin trading. Institutional investors are largely sidelined. US stocks cross-listed on European exchanges were hit hard, especially airlines, insurance, and financials.
Oil Markets
? Some brokers think it likely IPE Brent trade willinish early, around 1630 GMT, Wed in the absence of Nymex.
? Bearish Factors: Suspension of commercial air travel and possible mass cancellations once resumed; Falloff in energy demand due to shut businesses; Possible decline in equity markets and renewed fears over recession
? Bullish Factors: Fear of increased Mideast instability; Possible stockpiling of jet fuel for military use
? As of this morning, bearish factors seem to have the edge, with Brent Crude trading lower in London. Bullish factors will depend on how the investigation/response develop
Canada
? Provincial, territorial and federal mines and energy ministers cancelled the second day of their two-day meeting in Quebec City.
? Toronto Stock Exchange expected to remain closed today.
B. Transportation/Infrastructure Updates
Gas/Power Infrastructure
? The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission placed all nuclear power plants, research reactors, nuclear fuel facilities and gaseous diffusion plants on the highest level of security alert Tuesday. No companies have reported a curtailment of generation as a result of yesterday's attack.
? According to the NY ISO (Independent System Operator) the NY grid was functioning normally following the attacks on the WTC.
? ConEd went into a "thunderstorm alert", increasing in-city generation. Electricity, gas and steam service was suspended in an area in SW Manhattan.
? Natural Gas Intelligence is quoting a source that a force majeure could be declared by pipeline operators as a result of "confusion regarding accurate registration of nominations." No other confirmation was available.
? The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, which represents the nation's interstate natural gas pipelines, sent out an advisory urging its members follow procedures to increase security.
? Kinder Morgan's Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (NGPL) froze the status of its flowing gas volumes no longer accepting any changes to confirmed and scheduled volumes. Gas scheduled for Tuesday, Sept. 11 will roll forward and this situation will continue until further notice.
? Enbridge, Alliance, and TransCanada report increased security along pipeline facilities, but no expectations of supply/delivery interruption
BPA operating on skeleton crew. All non-essential personnel was evacuated, however, no threats against the hydro generator have been issued.
FERC cancelled regular Wednesday meeting, not rescheduled.
Authorities in Chicago barricaded the entrances to power plants and pumping facilities with concrete blocks and heavy trucks.
? Grand Coulee Dam and powerhouse in Washington state operational, but locked down
? Hoover Dam on Nevada-Arizona line is locked down.
Refineries/Crude/Products
? Tosco refinery in Linden NJ closed.
? Force Majeure likely to be declared by major crude product receivers in US ports;
? LA/Long Beach inspecting all incoming shipping-all incoming ships anchoring seven miles outside port.
? Louisiana Offshore Oil Port operations suspended pending security inspections.
? Reports
? Despite these problems, The American Petroleum Institute announced overnight that US energy markets were continuing to function smoothly, with oil deliveries "flowing normally" to the country's wholesale and retail markets.
Telecommunications
? Verizon switch on 10th floor of World Trade Center gone; 50,000 Manhattan lines taken out; Sprint and Verizon report all other data system busy, but operating normally
Air Travel
? FAA ban on outbound flights until noon EST today at the earliest.
? Huge logistics headaches and delays expected by airlines and air traffic controllers once US flights resume.
? Air cargo delays considerable due to rigorous inspections.
Maritime Transportation Conditions
? St. Lawrence Seaway reopened. Coast Guard inspections stepped up.
? New York Port closed, not receiving refined projects- Colonial Pipeline deliveries expected to "catch big premiums."
Border Crossings
? Security at all US-Canada border crossings on maximum alert. Bridges/tunnels closed. Freight forwarders reporting that freight movements over the border have slowed to a trickle.
? Rail freight moving normally across Canada-US border.
? US-Mexico border reopen, but subject to delays and inspections on US side. Mexican officials request that Mexican citizens delay trips to the US.
Political Update
International
US Arab allies (Egypt, Saudi, Jordan, Kuwait, UAE) walking a fine line. Masses believe US got what it deserves, but leaders have to condemn attacks to maintain relations with Washington. Moderate Arab leaders are concerned that support for attacks at home -- and possible US reactions to strike -- will increase instability and could lead to major upheaval in their countries. Saudi sources expect "state of confusion" to exist for immediate period ahead.
In the West, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has anything concrete yet. Everything is therefore speculation, albeit logical speculation. Most importantly, the sophistication means someone bigger than bin Laden was involved, even if he was the final perpetrator.
Oil Politics
OPEC's Rodriguez has reassured oil markets on supplies, but no high-level Saudi officials have officially echoed this sentiment (nothing from Oil Minister Naimi). Unofficially, we have reports that Saudi officials reporting that the terrorist incident "relieves pressure on us to make anti-US moves" in oil policy. | 2,283 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/249. | ,
Jacques,
Did you receive the fax from Kevin Kolb with a small change on page 2. It also included the conveyance and assignment document. Does this look ok to you? Is the language "Transfer will occur when first lien holder, Pacific Southwest Bank, approves the assignment" sufficient? Hopefully it is ok. Let me know if it is and I will come by your office to pick up executable copies.
Thank you,
Phillip | 2,284 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/25. | FW: ,
-----Original Message-----
From: "Greg Thorse" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:
Phillip;
These are just what I started with. I have not really fully looked at each
spreadsheet for error in logic or other.
I notice the primary difference between the existing projects and new
projects is that on an existing project you have to had value to be able to
increase the cash flow to be able to finance out of them to be able to
achieve a decent IRR. Thus you have to pay as little as possible, increase
the cash flow (i.e.-renovations), to compete with the quality of new
construction. And no I am not making numbers up nor am I sold on new
construction strictly. I just am working on the best look as possible.
I look forward to discussing this further.
Sincerely,
Greg Thorse
- Proforma.Sutters Mill.xls
- Proforma.Sage Crossing.xls
- Proforma.Waters At Bluff Springs.xls
- Proforma.South Park.xls
- Proforma.Sunrise Canyon.xls
- Proforma.SeaBreeze.xls
- Proforma.Harvard Place.xls | 2,285 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/250. | ,
John,
Do you still want to get together this week?
Phillip | 2,286 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/251. | RE: Leander etc. ,
Jeff,
The attorney's are done with the documents. I have a call in with Pauline to schedule a meeting to sign them. Most likely in Columbus. I am waiting to hear from her.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jeff Smith" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jeff+20Smith+22+20+3Cjsmith+40austintx+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:51 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Leander etc.
Phillip,
I spoke with Doug Bell this AM. He says AMHP got their letter from the
school last Thurs. Now they are getting a letter from Sam Olguin for an
easement. So the ball is back in his court. Once that happens the deal can
close.
What's up with Seguin?
Thanks.
Jeff Smith
The Smith Company
2714 Bee Cave Road, Suite 100-D
Austin, Texas 78746
512-732-0009
512-732-0010 fax
512-751-9728 mobile | 2,287 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/252. | ,
Greg or Darrell:
Did you get an official rejection or invitation on the New Braunfels project?
Phillip | 2,288 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/253. | ,
Greg,
What was the official word on New Braunfels?
Phillip | 2,289 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/255. | RE: ,
Mery,
The target audience document looks fine.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:52 AM
To: [email protected]; Arnold, John; Frolov, Yevgeny; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject:
We have begun working on our first deliverables for the Risk Management
Simulation project. The first thing we need your sign-off on is the Target
Audience Analysis. We have defined the key characteristics of our target
audience in order to help us maintain focus as we design the simulation.
I would appreciate it if you could review the attached document and respond
by end of day Monday, the 10th, with either your revisions or your
sign-off. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Mery
(See attached file: Target Audience.doc)
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.
- Target Audience.doc << File: Target Audience.doc >> | 2,291 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/256. | FW: Nine Energy Services ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:08 AM
To: Neal, Scott; Allen, Phillip K.; Martin, Thomas A.; Shively, Hunter S.
Cc: Bradford, William S.
Subject: Nine Energy Services
Scott, Phillip, Tom and Hunter -
Nine Energy Services LLC is a Woman and Minority Business Enterprise (WMBE) counterparty with whom ENA has been conducting physical gas business under our standard WMBE agreement. Nine Energy has refused to remit payment via wire transfer, per the terms of our agreement, and we are now placing them on NO TRADES status. Absolutely no trades can be conducted with this counterparty without full upfront payment.
Please pass this message to the originators on your desks. Thanks for your help; please call me with any questions.
Jay Willams | 2,292 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/257. | RE: howdy!! ,
Congratulations. Glad to hear you made it. You are in elite company.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: howdy!!
Horrible events this week!! Hope you did not know anyone involved.
Thought I would share my recent accomplishment with you, given you have
pretty much known me since I did my first Triathlon at Cinco Ranch about 4
years ago now I believe. Did my first ironman last Saturday up at Lake
Geneva in Wisconsin. Very long day and the hardest thing I have ever done,
but I finished which was my ultimate goal.
I would gladly trade it in to bring back some of the lost souls from
Tuesday, but unfortunately I do not have that power.
Hope everything is splendid with you. Talk to you soon,
Al Pollard
The New Power Company
[email protected]
(713) 345-8781 | 2,293 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/258. | RE: howdy!! ,
My guess at your time is 11 hrs 10 minutes. Was I close?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: howdy!!
Horrible events this week!! Hope you did not know anyone involved.
Thought I would share my recent accomplishment with you, given you have
pretty much known me since I did my first Triathlon at Cinco Ranch about 4
years ago now I believe. Did my first ironman last Saturday up at Lake
Geneva in Wisconsin. Very long day and the hardest thing I have ever done,
but I finished which was my ultimate goal.
I would gladly trade it in to bring back some of the lost souls from
Tuesday, but unfortunately I do not have that power.
Hope everything is splendid with you. Talk to you soon,
Al Pollard
The New Power Company
[email protected]
(713) 345-8781 | 2,294 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/259. | RE: ,
Don,
Jeff Gosset runs the risk management group. I spoke to him about including a module on how the books work. He liked the concept and is willing to sit down with you to discuss further. His number is X37306. He is expecting a call to set up a meeting.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-donald+2El+2Ebarnhart+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:37 PM
To: O'rourke, Tim
Cc: McDaniel, Kirk; Frolov, Yevgeny; [email protected]; [email protected]; Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: RE:
Tim,
Please clarify what is not right so I may make changes. I have received
verbal approval from Phillip today in our meeting.
Donald L. Barnhart
Houston
837/1591
713-837-1591
"O'rourke, Tim"
<Tim.O'[email protected] To: Mery L. Brown/Internal/Accenture@Accenture,
m> <[email protected]>, "Arnold, John" <[email protected]>, "Frolov,
Yevgeny" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
09/13/2001 07:07 PM cc: Donald L. Barnhart/Internal/Accenture@Accenture,
<[email protected]>, Sheri A. Righi/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
Subject: RE:
This looks about right.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:52 AM
To: [email protected]; Arnold, John; Frolov, Yevgeny;
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject:
We have begun working on our first deliverables for the Risk Management
Simulation project. The first thing we need your sign-off on is the
Target
Audience Analysis. We have defined the key characteristics of our target
audience in order to help us maintain focus as we design the simulation.
I would appreciate it if you could review the attached document and
respond
by end of day Monday, the 10th, with either your revisions or your
sign-off. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Mery
(See attached file: Target Audience.doc)
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in
error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | 2,295 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/26. | FW: ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:22 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: FW:
-----Original Message-----
From: "Greg Thorse" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:
Phillip;
These are just what I started with. I have not really fully looked at each
spreadsheet for error in logic or other.
I notice the primary difference between the existing projects and new
projects is that on an existing project you have to had value to be able to
increase the cash flow to be able to finance out of them to be able to
achieve a decent IRR. Thus you have to pay as little as possible, increase
the cash flow (i.e.-renovations), to compete with the quality of new
construction. And no I am not making numbers up nor am I sold on new
construction strictly. I just am working on the best look as possible.
I look forward to discussing this further.
Sincerely,
Greg Thorse
- Proforma.Sutters Mill.xls
- Proforma.Sage Crossing.xls
- Proforma.Waters At Bluff Springs.xls
- Proforma.South Park.xls
- Proforma.Sunrise Canyon.xls
- Proforma.SeaBreeze.xls
- Proforma.Harvard Place.xls | 2,296 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/260. | FW: Action Requested: Past Due Invoice ,
Can you approve this invoice or show me how to get into this system?
Thank you,
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]] <mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 10:06 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Action Requested: Past Due Invoice
Alert!
You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iPayit in-box that is past due. It is critical that you login to iPayit and take immediate action to resolve this invoice.
Remember, you play an important role in ensuring that we pay our vendors on time.
Tip!: You must login to the system to forward this invoice to another user.
You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iPayit in-box
that is past due. Please login to iPayit and resolve this invoice as soon as possible.
To launch iPayit, click on the link below:
<http://iPayit.enron.com>
Note: Your iPayit User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP Personnel ID and Password.
First time iPayit user? For training materials, click on the link below:
<http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265>
Need help?
Please contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.
If you are in Europe, please contact European Accounts Payable at +44 20 7783 7520. | 2,297 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/261. | FW: Action Requested: Past Due Invoice ,
-----Original Message-----
From: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]] <mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:06 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Action Requested: Past Due Invoice
Alert!
You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iPayit in-box that is past due. It is critical that you login to iPayit and take immediate action to resolve this invoice.
Remember, you play an important role in ensuring that we pay our vendors on time.
Tip!: You must login to the system to forward this invoice to another user.
You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iPayit in-box
that is past due. Please login to iPayit and resolve this invoice as soon as possible.
To launch iPayit, click on the link below:
<http://iPayit.enron.com>
Note: Your iPayit User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP Personnel ID and Password.
First time iPayit user? For training materials, click on the link below:
<http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265>
Need help?
Please contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.
If you are in Europe, please contact European Accounts Payable at +44 20 7783 7520. | 2,298 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/262. | FW: El Paso Capacity ,
John,
The spreadsheet below ("Valuation Summary..") calculates the value Enron would realize if we turned back the capacity or released it at full tolls. As of 9/17 mids, the 200,000/d leg would generate $16,918,907 if turned back. There is still a substantial amount of value above variable costs on the books. For 03-06, variable costs are around $0.15 but the mid-market spread is $0.45. The PV volume for that term is 22,000 contracts.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Bronstein, Mara
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:38 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: El Paso Capacity | 2,299 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/263. | ,
Jacques,
If you can believe it I have been unable to get with Pauline Kuo to sign all the agreements. Kevin Kolb sent me additional comments on Monday.
I faxed those to you. Can you please make the changes to the "Receipt of Payment". I can change and initial the small change on the settlement agreement or if you email the document I will change it on the computer.
It would be easier if you could email me the documents so I can print out originals here.
Thank you,
Phillip | 2,300 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/264. | ,
Jeff,
In light of the puny VAR allotments attributed to the simulated trading participants, we have decided to graduate Matt Smith from the exercise. Please advise Kimat Singla it will no longer be necessary to calculate a simulated book for Matt Smith. Please use his COB 9/25/01 P&L as his official score for this exercise and post his total on the High Score table under the initials MDS.
Thank you,
Phillip | 2,301 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/265. | RE: Final Internal Review for Sign Off: Common Mistakes ,
This is a list of common mistakes. However, as the group works together to create exercises and scenarios for the simulation many additional ideas will be generated. I don't want to hold up this document. I just want everyone to be aware that it is not all inclusive.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: McDaniel, Kirk
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; O'rourke, Tim; Frolov, Yevgeny
Subject: Final Internal Review for Sign Off: Common Mistakes
Gentlemen
Please take a look at the attached document. Provide me with your final input, if any, in so that I can give Accenture Sign off acceptance. This document includes input Accenture received or derived from yesterday's Design Scope meeting.
Tim do you still want to include on this document the issue around "Not listening to "Customer'/ Misjudging customers needs & risk"? Or do you feel it fits into one of the 8 high level buckets listed in the attachment.
I request everyone's input by COB, Wednesday 9/26 in so that if changes are needed we can still get final sign off by COB Friday 9/28. Thanks
- Common Mistakes-Sim.doc << File: Common Mistakes-Sim.doc >> | 2,302 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/266. | RE: Final Internal Review for Sign Off: Performance Objectives ,
Kirk,
This document is fine.
-----Original Message-----
From: McDaniel, Kirk
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:16 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; O'rourke, Tim; Frolov, Yevgeny
Subject: Final Internal Review for Sign Off: Performance Objectives
Importance: High
Gentlemen
Please take a look at the attached document. Provide me with your final input, if any, in so that I can give Accenture Sign off acceptance. This document includes input Accenture received or derived from yesterday's Design Scope meeting.
Tim
Your initial concerns around Processes and Knowledge Acquisition were relayed to Accenture and they stated that these will be addressed in the learning objectives, which will be the more detail backup to this high level documents.
Yevgeny
Your Fundamentals issue was handled by the i.e. notation on this document. In addition, Accenture said Yes that this document is aligned with the Topics Document and will be aligned with the more detailed back up document (i.e. Outline) that will support the Topics Document.
I request everyone's input by COB, Wednesday 9/26 in so that if changes are needed we can still get final sign off by COB Friday 9/28. Thanks
Cheers
Kirk
- Performance Objectives-Sim.doc << File: Performance Objectives-Sim.doc >> | 2,303 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/267. | RE: Final Internal Review for Sign Off: Topics and Related ,
Kirk,
I would modify this document slightly. The first section is titled "Introduction to Risk Management" and the second section is "Hedging Instruments/Risk Management Products". However, many of the bullet points in the first section are describing hedging instruments that belong in second section. I would limit the introduction to types of risk, identifying risk, and examples when risks are not hedged. Then the second section should contain all the details of hedging tools. Definitions of derivatives and how they can be used to manage the risk in the first section would be in this section. The third section would include the roles and accounting basics. You might want to include the commodity 101 info here, at least gas and power.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: McDaniel, Kirk
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:10 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; O'rourke, Tim; Frolov, Yevgeny
Subject: Final Internal Review for Sign Off: Topics and Related Objectives
Gentlemen
Please take a look at the attached document. Provide me with your final input, if any, in so that I can give Accenture Sign off acceptance. This document includes input Accenture received or derived from yesterday's Design Scope meeting.
I request everyone's input by COB, Thursday 9/27 in so that if changes are needed we can still get final sign off by COB Friday 9/28 or Monday 10/1. Thanks
Cheers
Kirk
- Topics and Related Objectives.doc << File: Topics and Related Objectives.doc >> | 2,304 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/268. | FW: Arizona ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawner, Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:31 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Miller, Stephanie; Allen, Phillip K.; Tholt, Jane M.
Subject: Arizona
I was just talking to counsel in Phoenix who informed me that a number of planned merchant generators in Arizona were in danger of being killed by the Arizona Corporation Commission. There are apparently concerns with interconnecting these plants where existing plants already are located, and reliability and terrorist-threat possibilities that they raise. I don't know if this matters to you but in case it does, just wanted you to know. | 2,305 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/269. | FW: El Paso Capacity ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Bronstein, Mara
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:38 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: El Paso Capacity | ryan.o'[email protected] | 2,306 |
|
allen-p/sent_items/27. | RE: Comanch Trace Home ,
Sounds good. This email address goes to my work. If you finish on Friday or over the weekend, please send to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Thanks,
Phillip Allen
-----Original Message-----
From: "Tony Roberts" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Comanch Trace Home
Phillip,
I will have the take off completed by Monday and will forward via email.
Thanks,
Tony Roberts | 2,307 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/270. | RE: Log Home Site ,
I like these homes much better than the one from earlier this week. I like the steeper pitched roof and the high glass windows in the top of the gables. Plus these seem a little bigger. I like the floor plan of the hoover plan better than the van gendersen. The kitchen should be bigger. You could take some space from the sewing room and add an island to the kitchen.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Jeff
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:42 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Log Home Site
http://www.ayrewood.com/Hoover_Floor_Plan.htm
Check this out.
Jeff Richter 503.464.3917 (w-pdx)
Enron North America 503.701.6488 (c)
West Power Services 503.464.3740 (fax)
121 SW Salmon Street 3WTC0306 [email protected]
Portland, Oregon 97204 | 2,308 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/271. | ,
Greg,
I forgot to mention the Perrin Oaks ideas. They are on the attached memo.
Have a good weekend.
Phillip | 2,309 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/272. | ,
Mery,
Please email me back with a location for tomorrow's meeting.
Phillip | 2,310 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/273. | RE: Bishops ,
Greg,
I went to the title company yesterday and as instructed by Irwin I signed t=
he deed of trust, the promissory note for 8.4, and the subordination agreem=
ent. Can the loan amount be adjusted based on new costs estimates. What w=
ill happen at closing? Is the major problem with the appraisal that since =
the land was only appraised at 1,120,000 we would be required to contribute=
an additional 180,000 in equity? If so, that is not good.
You mentioned that the we are firm on the construction numbers given to me =
previously. Can you send those numbers again so I can be positive I am not=
looking at old numbers. Also, I would really appreciate a schedule of tru=
e costs and expected loan.
Thank you,
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Greg Thorse <[email protected]>@ENRON =20
Sent:=09Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:45 PM
To:=09Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:=09Bishops
Phillip,
I am trying to press Bank to get the Deed of Trust to you. I am in a balanc=
ing act between moving on the construction and holding until the lien is pe=
rfected. I talked to Cheerie and she said the person in Dallas is trying to=
get it done today, however, she may not finish it out today, which means i=
t will be sent for Thursday morning delivery to a sister Ticor office for s=
ignature and recording. Have they told you any of this? Or do I need to ma=
ke sure you know when, where, and how as soon as I know.
I talked to Andrew this morning the Dallas office received the Appraisal an=
d gave the information to us over the phone. The appraised value as built =
is 12.5 million, the NOI is $1,152,695. The problem is the Land Value is $=
1,120,000, as this is what they have recorded as the transaction cost in Ja=
nuary. Andrew talked to me about if we want to put additional costs on top=
of this showing improvements or other costs associated with the value to s=
how an increase in value?. I am tending to think we are going to reduce ou=
r overall loan by adjusting the Land, Title Policy Amount, Debt Carry Cost =
and some other small adjustments to costs. This would reduce our overall de=
bt and resultant equity requirement. The main difference in committing to a=
greater loan is that our costs of points will rise and our equity may be o=
ut of balance in the end, vs. if we borrow the exact amount, we may risk be=
ing short and needing a loan increase for any soft cost overages. I have be=
en working on this and I am reviewing the changes to see what overall effec=
ts each change will have on your equity and return.
We are firm on the construction numbers given to you previously and we have=
had a number of additional costs which we have been able to absorb in the =
overall construction budget. The biggest is the detention pond dredging wh=
ich has gone up in cost. The only area left to work through is the foundat=
ion/concrete number and I am confident we will hit that one on the mark. Th=
us, overall I am comfortable with the Hard Cost numbers at this point.
I am attempting to get with Irwin and Cheerie and seeing if we can get the =
final Doc's put together. Have'nt been able to get a meeting yet.
I just got interrupted in another meeting. Let me know if there are any qu=
estions today. | 2,311 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/274. | ,
Kirk,
What is the deal with this boat trip? Seems too extravagant and wasteful. I am not comfortable with this. Can't we just have a small happy hour once the project is complete?
Phillip | 2,312 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/275. | ,
Gary,
Can you call me to discuss the panel quote for the Allen residence issued to Johnnie Brown? In April you worked up a quote for $20,000. The dimensions of the house have not changed. The quote given last week was over $26,000. Have raw materials and labor increased by over 25%? I need help understanding this increase.
Phillip Allen
713-853-7041 | 2,313 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/276. | ,
Richard,
I spoke to you earlier this week with questions about building with SIP's. I am planning to build a home in San Marcos as soon as I can decide on a builder and materials. I already have my blueprints completed. What I took from our conversation was to use the SIP's with 8.5" roof panels and use a metal roof.
I have been working with Johnnie Brown, a builder from San Antonio that is also a Creative Panel rep. The problem is that I have a budget of $85-$90/sf and it does not appear that he will be able to stay within that budget. I don't want to settle for a conventional stick built house. I was wondering about alternatives. Would some combination of a radiant barrier and non-CFC spray insulation provide close to the same energy savings at a lower cost than SIP's. For example, I just spoke to a sales rep for Demilec. He will spray foam insulation at $1.30/sf. That would be approximately $10,000 compared to over $20,000 additional costs for the panels. But would the foam insulation be as effective? Do you have any suggestions of materials or contractors that would help me construct the best home for the money. I am trying to get a bid from Wink with Premier based on you reference.
Thank you for your help.
Phillip Allen
[email protected]
713-853-7041 | 2,314 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/277. | ,
Greg,
I won't be in the office on Thursday. I am getting my knee scoped. I will be at home in the afternoon. 713-463-8626.
If you need to email me use [email protected].
I will be in the office on Friday.
Phillip | 2,315 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/278. | RE: Topic Outlines ,
Monica,
The outlines you just dropped off are fine.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-monica+2El+2Ebrown+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Topic Outlines
Phillip -
Thank you for giving us your feedback on the first seven topic outlines.
I've incorporated your thoughts, but was hoping you could take a look at
them since we didn't have a chance to go over them together. The outlines
and explanations are below. Could you respond back by EOD Monday in hopes
for us to send these outlines for Final Signoff?
Lastly, I was wondering if I could stop by (your's or Ina's desk) and pick
up your comments about the last three topic outlines by EOD Monday. Can you
let me know if this is possible?
Organizational Structure.
You jotted down "Jeff Gosset, M to M, P&L, and Positions". We have an
entire section about Mark to Market in the Risk Management Inputs topic.
P&L statements and Position reports are large sections in the Accounting
and Reporting topic. In addition, we discuss Mid Office in the Overview
page of this topic (org. structure). Is this enough or were you thinking
something in addition to what I just mentioned.
(See attached file: Framework Org Structure_4.doc)
Accounting and Reporting
I've incorporated the areas of "G&L, cash payments, and reconcilation into
the last section of the outline. Is this what you were thinking?
(See attached file: Framework AR_5.doc)
Thank you for your time,
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
PDP Experienced Analyst
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: [email protected]
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.
- Framework Org Structure_4.doc << File: Framework Org Structure_4.doc >>
- Framework AR_5.doc << File: Framework AR_5.doc >> | 2,316 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/279. | RE: workout ,
I will be there tomorrow, but I have a bunch of rehab exercises to do for my knee. I probably won't be much of a partner for a couple more weeks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Landry, Chad
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 7:21 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: workout
sorry i missed this morning. i was out of town this weekend and i just flew in this morning. Tomorrow morning I plan on running on the treadmill from 540 am - 600 am and working out with weights from 6 - 645 am. will you be there tomorrow?
ckl | 2,317 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/28. | ,
--------- Inline attachment follows ---------
From: <"JEFF SMITH" <[email protected]>@ENRON>
To: Allen, Phillip K. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PALLEN>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:36:30 GMT
Subject:
If you decide to move to Kerrville I know of an excellent builder that I
have worked with in the past.
He has built numerous custom homes in the Kerrville\Fredericksburg area that
are very high quality. He has excellent long time crews using local German
craftsmen. They do outstanding trim work and framing. Most of his houses
are Texas style with solid rock walls, standing seam roofs, antique wood
flooring, cabinets, etc.
Let me know if you are interested.
Jeff Smith
The Smith Company
9400 Circle Drive
Austin, TX 78736
512-394-0908 office
512-394-0913 fax
512-751-9728 mobile
[email protected]
--------- Inline attachment follows ---------
From: <"JEFF SMITH" <[email protected]>@ENRON>
To: Allen, Phillip K. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PALLEN>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:16:18 GMT
Subject:
The seller said she would fax the numbers tomorrow morning (12\14). She
says the NOI is around $300,000 per year. After taking into account the
management fee she says they will accept a price of $2,700,000.
This is not a bad price for a well maintained\located property with large
average unit sizes. See the attached Excel file for a description of the
property
Jeff Smith
The Smith Company
9400 Circle Drive
Austin, TX 78736
512-394-0908 office
512-394-0913 fax
512-751-9728 mobile
[email protected]
- colonial oaks -kerrville no data.xls | 2,318 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/280. | RE: Managing Directors Meeting ,
Yes, I will attend the meeting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rangel, Ina
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Managing Directors Meeting
Phillip:
Will you be attending the managing directors meeting on Monday at the Hyatt? I put you down as a yes, but can cancel.
Let me know
-Ina | 2,319 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/282. | ,
Karen,
I interviewed Agustin Leon and Zoya Raynes. Here are my comments:
Agustin Leon: Has a lot of experience with quantitative and technical analysis. Programming and language
skills. If not a trader could be an asset to research group.
Zoya Raynes: Has already been through Salomon's rotational program. Her interest lean more towards
marketing than trading. Seems very talented.
I would recommend both candidates for further consideration.
Phillip | 2,320 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/283. | ,
Tim,
Since the three nuclear units have gone down there has been a significant increase in imports into California from the northwest which coincides with increased hydro output. This has continued to suppress Socal gas sendouts. Grand Coulee outflows on Monday and Tuesday have exceeded inflows. Monday: In-69.8, Out-73.4; Tuesday: In-57.7, Out 68.2. The elevation is starting to creep lower.
Can you help us with these questions? Will this drafting to continue? What is the elevation target for the end of the month? Why did yesterday's inflow decline so much?
Thank you,
Phillip Allen | 2,321 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/284. | RE: Paul Margraves Meeting ,
I am going to be in a meeting with Accenture on Friday from 9am until 3pm. So I can't meet with Paul Margraves. Have him call me directly and I will set something up.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Rangel, Ina
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:31 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Paul Margraves Meeting
Paul Margraves would like to come here and meet with you at 1:30 this Friday. He says it would be a quick 15 minute general meeting. I put him on your calendar and told him if something needed to change I would call him back. Is this okay with you?
-Ina | 2,322 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/285. | FW: ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Heizenrader, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:08 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Cc: Nelson, Kourtney
Subject: RE:
Phillip:
The target for end of October is 1283. We're not sure what's driving the day to day variation. Direct effects of recent precipitation, combined with some very big precip forecast errors, are part of the explanation, but there also appears to be something going on with management of the non-treaty storage that BPA's cached upstream in Arrow. We've been looking into that, and hope to get some news via Technical Management Team today.
From a multi-purpose project manager's perspective, I think that current reservoir elevation is one or two feet too high, so I do expect drawdown by month end. I also suspect that there are some limits in the non-treaty storage approaching that require at least partial withdrawal.
The net effect should be a rise in production-- no more downstream storage is available and upstream releases will increase, certainly by November 1, but probably earlier.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 7:31 AM
To: Heizenrader, Tim
Subject:
Tim,
Since the three nuclear units have gone down there has been a significant increase in imports into California from the northwest which coincides with increased hydro output. This has continued to suppress Socal gas sendouts. Grand Coulee outflows on Monday and Tuesday have exceeded inflows. Monday: In-69.8, Out-73.4; Tuesday: In-57.7, Out 68.2. The elevation is starting to creep lower.
Can you help us with these questions? Will this drafting to continue? What is the elevation target for the end of the month? Why did yesterday's inflow decline so much?
Thank you,
Phillip Allen | 2,323 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/286. | RE: Huntley followup question ,
Bob,
I do have a survey of the sight at home. I will get you a copy tomorrow.
Regarding contracts, the Texas Real Estate Commission website has copies of the contracts we need. The website is below. I believe the relevant contracts are form #20-4(One to Four Family Residential Contract) and form #OP-H (Seller's Disclosure of Property Condition). A coworker is about to close on a home without using a broker and these are the forms he used.
I
Phillip
http://www.trec.state.tx.us/formsrulespubs/forms/forms-contracts.asp
-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Huntley followup question
Phillip,
I forgot to ask if you have a recent survey of the lot from when you closed? I would like to see if we'll have any easement problems above or around the garage area to consider.
If you find something and it's faxable, please send it to my fax at 281-858-1127. Feel free to call first if you have any comments.
Thanks,
Bob Huntley
281-858-0000 | 2,324 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/287. | RE: Check this out - ,
I like the cedar t-111 version better. Why don't you tell this shop teacher not to be to comfortable and that you will be taking his job in two years.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:45 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Check this out -
<< File: Mvc-002f.jpg >> << File: Mvc-013f.jpg >> << File: ATT24174.txt >> Phillip,
Which one should I do, the 8x12 is half the price.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Mel Nelson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:06 AM
To: Richter, Jeff
Subject:
October 17, 2001
Jeff:
I talked to your dad and he has mentioned that you might be interested in
having our class build a shed for you. We pretty much make whatever you
would like to the specifications that you prefer. All of our buildings are
durable and solidly constructed. We build them in our shop and the ownner
is rersponsible for their delivery. There is no labor cost so you are only
charged for the materials.
Our most popular size and style is the 8' x 12' barn . This is the most
economical building that we construct and it is an easier one to haul to a
given site. This building has an exterior of T-111 siding which is cedar
style grooved exterior plywood which can be stained and sealed. We have
usually build them with a 3'-10 1/2" wide door opening. I would think that
would be wide enough for a four wheeler, but you would have to have your
dad measure your vehicle to make sure.. We have probably built and sold
over 30 of these in the past ten years. The price on this shed usually
varies between $800 and $900.
Your dad also indicated an interest in a 10 x 12 gable style shed which is
a bit bigger and ofcourse more expensive. It has vinyl siding and aluminum
soffit/overhang, I am attaching a picture of one we made for Joe
Pronschinske. This project is a bit harder to transport as it is oversize
and legally you are to obtain an oversize laod permit to haul it. Your
dad indicated that Joe would possibly haul it though.
The picture I am attaching shows a common 3' entry door. We are presently
building a structure for Nolan Goplin that has a overhead 6' wide roll up
door. The price on a 10' x 12' shed with a 6' wide roll-up door would be
roughly $1500.
We will build either style and can modify the plans to meet your
needs. With the time we have left in the semester the 8 x 12 would be the
easiest for us to build, but if you let me know right away, by Monday
October 22, that you would like a 10 x12 size we would still be able to
finish that one on time.
If you have any questions just e-mail me or call:
Whitehall School Disctrict 715-538-4364
My Home number 715-985-3063.
Have a good one and take with you later.
Sincerely,
Mel Nelson | 2,325 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/288. | ,
Randy,
Why is there a PG&E Citygate position in Mgmt-West? Were these positions created in the last week or so? Can you print a forwards detail and move these deals into FT-PGE? Do not just transfer at mid market. Please move the deals.
Phillip | 2,326 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/289. | ,
John,
It would be a good idea to pull together the desk heads to air out concerns. We all have questions and don't feel we have all the facts to answer the questions employees are asking.
The sooner the better.
Phillip | 2,327 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/29. | RE: kerrville ,
If you get the info from the owner this afternoon, please send it to [email protected].
-----Original Message-----
From: "JEFF SMITH" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:37 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: kerrville
If you decide to move to Kerrville I know of an excellent builder that I
have worked with in the past.
He has built numerous custom homes in the Kerrville\Fredericksburg area that
are very high quality. He has excellent long time crews using local German
craftsmen. They do outstanding trim work and framing. Most of his houses
are Texas style with solid rock walls, standing seam roofs, antique wood
flooring, cabinets, etc.
Let me know if you are interested.
Jeff Smith
The Smith Company
9400 Circle Drive
Austin, TX 78736
512-394-0908 office
512-394-0913 fax
512-751-9728 mobile
[email protected] | 2,328 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/290. | RE: Huntley update ,
Thanks for the update.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Huntley update
Greetings Phillip,
I received your phone message. Thanks for the update. I have been talking
with contractors and Spring Valley. At this point we are trying to
determine whether the addition over the garage would be workable. Heather
probably told you that I am meeting with a contractor on 11/7 at your home
to get a firm bid on the project. I spoke today with the Spring Valley
building consultant and faxed him some detail. There are a couple of
possible problems he is looking at and we'll possibly need to get a variance
from the decision makers when the time comes.
In the meantime, I printed out the earnest money contract and sellers
disclosure forms from the website you found. We are waiting on the final
word from Spring Valley to move ahead. I'll let you know when we have some
new information.
Thanks,
Bob Huntley
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:18 AM
Subject: RE: Huntley followup question
Bob,
I do have a survey of the sight at home. I will get you a copy tomorrow.
Regarding contracts, the Texas Real Estate Commission website has copies of
the contracts we need. The website is below. I believe the relevant
contracts are form #20-4(One to Four Family Residential Contract) and form
#OP-H (Seller's Disclosure of Property Condition). A coworker is about to
close on a home without using a broker and these are the forms he used.
I
Phillip
http://www.trec.state.tx.us/formsrulespubs/forms/forms-contracts.asp
-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Huntley followup question
Phillip,
I forgot to ask if you have a recent survey of the lot from when you
closed? I would like to see if we'll have any easement problems
above or around the garage area to consider.
If you find something and it's faxable, please send it to my fax at
281-858-1127. Feel free to call first if you have any comments.
Thanks,
Bob Huntley
281-858-0000
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | 2,329 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/291. | FW: FERC Special Meetings on Friday 10/26/01 and Monday 10/29/01 ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Capitol Connection <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:37 AM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)@ENRON
Subject: FERC Special Meetings on Friday 10/26/01 and Monday 10/29/01
The Capitol Connection is pleased to announce that it will broadcast (via
the internet and telephone Only) the following Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Special Meetings:
Friday, October 26, 9.30 a.m. ET
Topic: Interstate Natural Gas Facility Planning Seminar, Presentation of
Staff Findings
Monday, October 29, 1:00 p.m. ET
Topic: Technical Conference Concerning West-Wide Price Mitigation for
Winter Season & Procedures for seeking participation
If you have an annual subscription to the Capitol Connection internet
service, these meetings are included in the annual fee. Please contact us
if you are interested in signing up for either of these meetings or want to
get an annual subscription to our internet service.
The Capitol Connection offers FERC meetings live via the Internet, as well
as via Phone Bridge, and satellite, please visit our website at
www.capitolconnection.org <http://www.capitolconnection.org>. or send e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> for more
information. If there is a meeting you are interested in receiving, please
call 703-993-3100.
David Reininger
Meeting dates and times are subject to change without notice. For current
information, you can go to our website at www.capitolconnection.org <http://www.capitolconnection.org> and
select the FERC link or you can go to the FERC web page at www.ferc.fed.us <http://www.ferc.fed.us>.
The FERC Office of the Secretary can be reached at 202.208.0400. | 2,330 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/292. | FW: Distribution Form ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Ratcliff, Renee
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:05 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Distribution Form
Phillip,
Pursuant to your request, please see the attached.
Thanks,
Renee | 2,331 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/293. | RE: Huntley/question ,
I will try and find my title policy this evening.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Huntley/question
Phillip,
Could you please do me a favor? I would like to read your current title policy to see what it says about easements. You should have received a copy during your closing. I don't know how many pages it will be but let me know how you want to handle getting a copy made. I'll be happy to make the copy, or whatever makes it easy for you.
Thanks,
Bob Huntley | 2,332 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/294. | RE: Distribution Form ,
Renee,
Thank you for the forms. I am trying to estimate my tax obligation. It is my understanding that the account balance will be treated as ordinary income. What about Social Security and Medicare taxes? I thought those were already deducted. Also, the are no earnings on the deferrals I have made. On the contrary, there are losses. Is it possible to recoup any taxes paid?
Thanks for you help.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Ratcliff, Renee
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:05 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Distribution Form
Phillip,
Pursuant to your request, please see the attached.
Thanks,
Renee
<< File: Request For Distribution_1994 Plan.doc >> << File: Request for Distribution Procedures_1994 Plan.doc >> | 2,333 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/295. | RE: Distribution Form ,
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Ratcliff, Renee
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:05 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: RE: Distribution Form
Phillip,
The Social Security and Medicare tax has been previously withheld on your deferral. You would be subject to only Federal Income Tax withholding on the distribution. I checked with my director (Pam Butler) on your question about recouping taxes already paid. It is my understanding that you cannot recoup these taxes.
Thanks,
Renee
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Ratcliff, Renee
Subject: RE: Distribution Form
Renee,
Thank you for the forms. I am trying to estimate my tax obligation. It is my understanding that the account balance will be treated as ordinary income. What about Social Security and Medicare taxes? I thought those were already deducted. Also, the are no earnings on the deferrals I have made. On the contrary, there are losses. Is it possible to recoup any taxes paid?
Thanks for you help.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Ratcliff, Renee
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:05 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Distribution Form
Phillip,
Pursuant to your request, please see the attached.
Thanks,
Renee
<< File: Request For Distribution_1994 Plan.doc >> << File: Request for Distribution Procedures_1994 Plan.doc >> | 2,334 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/299. | RE: Blackline of First Amendment to Contract ,
Michelle,
Here are my comments:
Section 9b- It is my understanding that the Utility lines are currently under construction and should be finished by late February 2002. Can we reference the work that is being performed by the contractor, JC Evans. I want to avoid any ambiguity regarding the "Utility Lines". Also can we make the same distinction in the Utility Construction Escrow Agreement in Section C.
Section 10- Please change to Purchaser can extend closing for 3 successive periods of 30 days each for $10,000 per extension, not applicable to purchase price and non-refundable.
Also, I would prefer to sign the first amendment and the utility escrow documents at the same time since they reference each other.
I have sent Mike B. a copy of this email.
Thank you,
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: "Simpkins, Michelle" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:28 PM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Blackline of First Amendment to Contract
<<3MMPRED.DOC>>
Phillip,
Enclosed please find a blackline of the First Amendment to Contract showing
the revisions. I have forwarded a clean version of the Amendment to you for
your signature. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at
(512) 370-2836. Thanks.
Michelle L. Simpkins
Winstead Sechrest & Minick P.C.
100 Congress Avenue, Suite 800
Austin, Texas 78701
(512) 370-2836
(512) 370-2850 Fax
[email protected]
- 3MMPRED.DOC << File: 3MMPRED.DOC >> | 2,336 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/3. | FW: Zero Option ,
The project coordinators believe they can reach a solution with Accenture in which Enron pays no additional fees but the project is completed in a slightly scaled back form. This allows Accenture to have a completed project and no more cash goes out the door.
The effort from the SME's should be complete by Christmas. Please push forward with the review of the knowledge layer.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Frolov, Yevgeny
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:51 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Cc: O'rourke, Tim; Coleman, Brad; McDaniel, Kirk
Subject: Zero Option
Phillip,
It will go along this lines: (Conservative)
*****************************************************
We pay "0" going forward
We have already played 300K in 3Q2001
Outstanding bill for $27,740 will hit Enron Q1, 2002
Enron and surviving entity will have the right to use it internally
We value Enrons SME time @ around 300K
Accenture will have the right to use it internally and modify the product at its will for internal & external use.
This arrangement will void 900K Enrons Revenue from Accenture
Enron would receive 0% royalty on all external sales. I was thinking to stay away from royalty as we do not know what will be new company position on this matter. Also, I do not think Accenture will want to enter into partnership structure with a ghost company unless we get Dinergy involved.
***********************************************************************
If we do not reach the agreement: 1. Terminate and pay around 500-600k (estimate) The payment could be deferred in to 2Q 2002 or
2. Continue "as is" with payment differed for 90 days or merger.
We are sending Accenture official notice as of tomorrow we have 10 business days to workout solution or terminate.
Any comments or suggestions?
Regards,
Yevgeny
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:32 PM
To: Frolov, Yevgeny
Subject: RE: BRM Case & Options
Yevgeny,
Please send me an email describing the zero option so I can pass it along to the other SME's.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Frolov, Yevgeny
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Cc: McDaniel, Kirk; Coleman, Brad; O'rourke, Tim
Subject: BRM Case & Options
Importance: High
Phillip,
I am following up to our BRM conversation from Friday. Obviously it is a valid questions to ask and as you requested I am attaching two documents: one summarizing the options and 2nd cash flow impact. In the cash flow impact Case 2 & 3 already account for additional cut of 100k from existing cost. (it comes from Expenses such as projected traveling 30K+Cut in Media 20K + Cut in sim exercises 50K) The cut in sim exercises need to be confirmed with you. A total of two sims could be cut one. Accenture will address this question tomorrow during the meeting. Also, I will ask them to cut the meeting by 10 min, thus we can go over the documents and can answer your questions. I am not sure what is Tim's schedule for tomorrow, but at least Kirk and myself will be around.
Obviously cutting sims is not the best options but we are considering all alternatives at this time. We will continue to review how to cut labor and expenses.
One question that it would be good if you think about it before we meet is as follow. Is BRM "core" to the Enron for next few months or new organization? Please consider the costs of finishing this project.
Sincerely,
Yevgeny Frolov
713-345-8250 w
<< File: BRM Cash Flow Cases.xls >> << File: BRM Contingency Numbers Rev3.xls >> | 2,337 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/30. | ,
Can you fax me the rent roll? 713-646-2391.
Also please send the unit mix and square footages again.
Thanks,
Phillip | 2,338 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/300. | FW: Blackline of First Amendment to Contract ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:58 AM
To: '"Simpkins, Michelle" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON'
Subject: RE: Blackline of First Amendment to Contract
Michelle,
Here are my comments:
Section 9b- It is my understanding that the Utility lines are currently under construction and should be finished by late February 2002. Can we reference the work that is being performed by the contractor, JC Evans. I want to avoid any ambiguity regarding the "Utility Lines". Also can we make the same distinction in the Utility Construction Escrow Agreement in Section C.
Section 10- Please change to Purchaser can extend closing for 3 successive periods of 30 days each for $10,000 per extension, not applicable to purchase price and non-refundable.
Also, I would prefer to sign the first amendment and the utility escrow documents at the same time since they reference each other.
I have sent Mike B. a copy of this email.
Thank you,
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: "Simpkins, Michelle" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:28 PM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Blackline of First Amendment to Contract
<<3MMPRED.DOC>>
Phillip,
Enclosed please find a blackline of the First Amendment to Contract showing
the revisions. I have forwarded a clean version of the Amendment to you for
your signature. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at
(512) 370-2836. Thanks.
Michelle L. Simpkins
Winstead Sechrest & Minick P.C.
100 Congress Avenue, Suite 800
Austin, Texas 78701
(512) 370-2836
(512) 370-2850 Fax
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
- 3MMPRED.DOC << File: 3MMPRED.DOC >> | 2,339 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/301. | RE: the candidate we spoke about this morning... ,
Adrianne,
I cannot download his resume. Please resend.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Engler, Adrianne
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: the candidate we spoke about this morning...
Phillip -
This is the candidate I spoke with you about this morning...
Brent currently works in our London office as an Analyst and is looking to come over to the Houston office. We would like to get him into the November 1st interviews.
His contact information is on the resume, but here is his number as well
44-20-778-35558 ....for a London line direct to Brent dial 844-35558
Thank you!
Adrianne
x57302
the resume is attached.... | 2,340 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/302. | ,
Brent,
Please call me so we can do a 15 minute phone interview regarding your interest in the trading track program.
Phillip Allen
West gas trading
713-853-7041 | 2,341 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/303. | RE: the candidate we spoke about this morning... ,
Left message and sent email. I will let you know as soon as I have spoken to him.
-----Original Message-----
From: Engler, Adrianne
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: RE: the candidate we spoke about this morning...
Phillip -
Lets try this one....Thanks!
Adrianne
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Engler, Adrianne
Subject: RE: the candidate we spoke about this morning...
Adrianne,
I cannot download his resume. Please resend.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Engler, Adrianne
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: the candidate we spoke about this morning...
Phillip -
This is the candidate I spoke with you about this morning...
Brent currently works in our London office as an Analyst and is looking to come over to the Houston office. We would like to get him into the November 1st interviews.
His contact information is on the resume, but here is his number as well
44-20-778-35558 ....for a London line direct to Brent dial 844-35558
Thank you!
Adrianne
x57302
the resume is attached.... | 2,342 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/304. | RE: Confirmation: Risk Management Simulation Meeting 10/30/01 ,
Please send more details regarding this meeting
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Confirmation: Risk Management Simulation Meeting 10/30/01
Hi Phillip,
This message is to confirm our meeting with you on, Tuesday, October 30th
from 9:00 am - 10:00 am, the location will be EB 3267. Attendees will be
Monica Brown and Sheri Righi.
Let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 713-345-6687.
Thanks,
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: [email protected]
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited. | 2,343 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/305. | RE: the candidate we spoke about this morning... ,
Adrianne,
I spoke to Brent D. I would recommend that he is given a chance to interview for the program.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Engler, Adrianne
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: RE: the candidate we spoke about this morning...
Phillip -
Lets try this one....Thanks!
Adrianne
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Engler, Adrianne
Subject: RE: the candidate we spoke about this morning...
Adrianne,
I cannot download his resume. Please resend.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Engler, Adrianne
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: the candidate we spoke about this morning...
Phillip -
This is the candidate I spoke with you about this morning...
Brent currently works in our London office as an Analyst and is looking to come over to the Houston office. We would like to get him into the November 1st interviews.
His contact information is on the resume, but here is his number as well
44-20-778-35558 ....for a London line direct to Brent dial 844-35558
Thank you!
Adrianne
x57302
the resume is attached.... | 2,344 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/306. | RE: Confirmation: Risk Management Simulation Meeting 10/30/01 ,
Can we meet from 10am-11am instead?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:16 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Confirmation: Risk Management Simulation Meeting 10/30/01
Sheri and I would like to discuss the practice questions and graphic ideas
with you for the the Knowledge System. We wanted to get some feedback from
you as well as your input.
Thanks,
Monica
[email protected]
om To: Monica L. Brown/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
cc:
10/29/2001 09:02 AM Subject: RE: Confirmation: Risk Management Simulation Meeting
10/30/01
Please send more details regarding this meeting
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Confirmation: Risk Management Simulation Meeting 10/30/01
Hi Phillip,
This message is to confirm our meeting with you on, Tuesday, October
30th
from 9:00 am - 10:00 am, the location will be EB 3267. Attendees will
be
Monica Brown and Sheri Righi.
Let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at
713-345-6687.
Thanks,
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: [email protected]
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in
error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any
other
use of the email by you is prohibited.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited. | 2,345 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/307. | RE: Bishops Corner ,
Greg,
I would rather sign and fax copies of the necessary contracts then follow up with originals through the mail.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: "Greg Thorse" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:00 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Bishops Corner
Phillip,
I need to get the contract for Galaxy and Grande executed today. In addition
I will need to close the loan at the title company in Hays County this week.
If you elect me vice-president of Bishops Corner, Inc., I can take care of
all of the documents. From a logistics standpoint this probably would be
the best way to handle it.
Please let me know today if possible so I can send them to the lender.
Sincerely,
Greg Thorse | 2,346 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/308. | ,
Jacques,
I need to pull together the Bishops Corner organization documents so we can close on the bank loan. Did Keith and I take the originals or did we leave them with you? I know we still need to issue the shares for the GP.
Please drop me a note.
Phillip Allen | 2,347 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/309. | FW: Properties for sale ,
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jeff Smith" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Properties for sale
There are three other deals that I will fax to you. let me know if you have
an interest.
Thanks,
Jeff Smith
The Smith Company
9400 Circle Drive
Austin, Texas 78736
512-394-0908 office
512-394-0913 fax
512-751-9728 mobile
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
- Metropolitan sales sheet.xls
- south center oaks sales sheet.xls
- Treaty Oaks Sales Sheet.xls | 2,348 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/31. | ,
Greg,
I plugged the data on Colonial Oaks into your format. The actual NOI for 2001 is around 305,000. But there is not a professional management company. Subtracting $25,000 for management costs the NOI would be $280,000. However, I increased the taxes and a few other expenses to bring total expenses up to $3,000/unit. This would yield an NOI of $240,000. Comparing the rents charged to the other 17 properties, it doesn't look like the rents have a great deal of upside.
The asking price is $2,700,000. Using $240,000 would make this an 8.9 cap. Using the seller's NOI of $280,000 would be a 10.4 cap. The cost per unit is $33,750 for a 1969 project. The cost per square foot is 36.58.
The numbers would be better if the property was offered at $2.5 million. Jeff Smith claims that $2.7 million is as low as the seller will go. This property has not been on the market. So I would like your input of what the market would pay for it. If $280,000 is a reasonable NOI, then I would thing it would be sold fairly quickly for $2.7 million. It does have the benefit of all brick exterior and elderly tenants. Plus the location is by far the most convenient.
Financing is the other consideration. I am assuming 25 year, 7%, and 25% down. What do you think could actually be achieved? Can you put me in contact with a lender?
I will follow up with a phone call.
Thanks,
Phillip | 2,349 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/32. | ,
Jeff,
I reviewed your revised offer sheet. I am OK with the effective income of $484K. Her records show basically no other income ($75/month), so I subtracted $3,000 from your number. The expenses just need to reflect $20,000 more property taxes and the numbers should be right on. $484 less $244 would be $240 of NOI. I spoke to Jim Murnane this afternoon. He feels this property would most likely warrant 7.5% and a 30 year amortization. See the attached spreadsheets. | 2,350 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/33. | ,
Here is lakeside in your format. Looks like 11% cash on cash plus whatever principal is paid on the note. My biggest concern is that actual vacancies and concessions have been higher than in the pro forma used to underwrite the offering. Also expenses were higher. Why would we be able to do any better than the existing management?
I would like to come see it again on Wednesday. I would be bringing 1 or 2 others. Could we see it in the morning around 9:30 or 10 am?
Phillip | 2,351 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/34. | FW: Chase Backtest ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Hayden, Frank
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:54 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Cc: Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Subject: FW: Chase Backtest
Attached is the file I'm proposing to send to Chase with suggested wording. To eliminate "Chase" from using data to "back-in" to pnl, we deleted all up days, and forwarded out corrected data, per files received from Jeff and Stacey.
Please review and provide feedback. Additionally, if you are comfortable with data, please authorize its release.
Thanks
Frank
"Steve
Following on from our discussion concerning the back testing data, we have re-checked the underlying data with our middle office. There were some errors in your file which we have now corrected, and for clarity, included losses in the backtest file, since these are what we consider in the backtest process.
I trust this helps - let us know if you need anything further
Regards" | 2,352 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/35. | RE: try this one for starters ,
Mac,
This looks good. I won't know exactly what my cash position is until mid January. I will let you know.
Thanks,
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: "Hargrove, Mac D [PVTC]" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:47 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: FW: try this one for starters
Phillip,
This is our muni traders recommendation. Look it over and let me know what
you think.
Mac
> ----------
> From: Martin, Deanna L [MSD]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
> To: Hargrove, Mac D [PVTC]
> Subject: try this one for starters
>
> <<1.pdf>>
> let me know about questions.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reminder: E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure.
Do not use e-mail to send us confidential information
such as credit card numbers, changes of address, PIN
numbers, passwords, or other important information.
Do not e-mail orders to buy or sell securities, transfer
funds, or send time sensitive instructions. We will not
accept such orders or instructions. This e-mail is not
an official trade confirmation for transactions executed
for your account. Your e-mail message is not private in
that it is subject to review by the Firm, its officers,
agents and employees.
--------------------------------------------------------------
- 1.pdf << File: 1.pdf >> | 2,353 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/368. | RE: Distribution of report ,
Is this the weekly fundamentals report produced by Tim Heizenrader's group?=
In Houston, we have been receiving the report on Tuesday afternoon via em=
ail before the fundamentals meeting in Portland. How can distribution thro=
ugh or administrative assistants be more efficient? =20
The administrative assistant for the West gas desk is Ina Rangel. Her loca=
tion is EB3210.
Phillip Allen
713-853-7041
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Bruce, James =20
Sent:=09Monday, October 29, 2001 4:34 PM
To:=09Allen, Phillip K.; Alonso, Tom; Alport, Kysa; Badeer, Robert; Belden,=
Tim; Brown, Kortney; Bruce, James; Bryson, Jesse; Buerkle, Jim; Cadena, An=
gela; Calger, Christopher F.; Chang, Fran; Chen, Andy; Choi, Paul; Clark, E=
d; Comnes, Alan; Conwell, Wendy; Dalia, Minal; Davidson, Debra; Donovan, Te=
rry W.; Driscoll, Michael M.; Dunton, Heather; Dyer, Laird; Eriksson, Fredr=
ik; Etringer, Michael; Fillinger, Mark; Foster, Chris H.; Frost, David; Ful=
ler, Dave; Gilbert, Jim; Gomez, Julie A.; Gray, Stan; Grigsby, Mike; Guilla=
ume, David; Guzman, Mark; Hammond, Don; Holst, Keith; Kaufman, Paul; Lackey=
, Chris; Law, Samantha; Mainzer, Elliot; Malowney, John; Mays, Wayne; Mcdon=
ald, Michael; Mckay, Jonathan; Miller, Stephanie; Motley, Matt; Mullen, Mar=
k; Mumm, Chris; Nelson, Kourtney; Ngo, Tracy; Oh, Jeffrey; Page, Jonalan; P=
arquet, David; Perry, Todd; Polsky, Phil; Presto, Darin; Radous, Paul; Ranc=
e, Susan; Rawson, Lester; Richter, Jeff; Rosman, Stewart; Sacks, Edward; Sa=
lisbury, Holden; Sarnowski, Julie; Savage, Gordon; Scholtes, Diana; Semperg=
er, Cara; Shields, Jeff; Slaughter, Jeff G.; Smith, Sarabeth; Soderquist, L=
arry; Surowiec, Glenn; Swain, Steve; Swerzbin, Mike; Symes, Kate; Thomas, J=
ake; Thome, Stephen; Thome, Stephen; Thompson, Virginia; Van Gelder, John; =
Ward, Kim S (Houston); Wente, Laura; Williams III, Bill; Williams, Bill; Wi=
lliams, Jason R (Credit); Zufferli, John
Subject:=09Distribution of report
The method for distribution of the weekly reports has changed. Hard copies=
will now be distributed through your administrative assistant. =20
To receive a paper copy of the report, please send me an e-mail request inc=
luding you location and admin. =20
The information in these reports is for internal use only and should not be=
the basis for investment decisions. =20
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments,
James Bruce=09
Enron North America=09=09(503) 464-8122
West Power Desk=09=09(503) 860-8612 (c)
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306=09(503) 464-3740 (fax)
Portland, OR [email protected] | 2,355 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/369. | RE: Huntley/question ,
Bob,
I found the warranty deed but I could not find the title policy. I will call the title company that we used to get a copy today.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Re: Huntley/question
Phillip,
Have you found the title policy?
Thanks,
Bob Huntley
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Huntley/question
> I will try and find my title policy this evening.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:50 PM
> To: Allen, Phillip K.
> Subject: Huntley/question
>
>
> Phillip,
>
> Could you please do me a favor? I would like to read your current
> title policy to see what it says about easements. You should have
> received a copy during your closing. I don't know how many pages it
> will be but let me know how you want to handle getting a copy made.
> I'll be happy to make the copy, or whatever makes it easy for you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob Huntley
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
> | 2,356 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/370. | RE: Amerex - Scott Halprian ,
Andy,
I don't know what your need for brokerage services are, but Scott is nice enough as far as brokers go. Personally, I am extremely pleased with the transition to online platforms and find that I can get 90%+ of my business done online. If you have a need for brokers, Scott is a good choice.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Fairley, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:13 AM
To: Holst, Keith; Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Amerex - Scott Halprian
Hi guys,
We met last February when I was over in Houston and you kindly gave me some pointers as to how we in the UK can apply your experiences to the UK market.
I have had a call from Scott at Amerex saying he is moving to London to set up here.
He has said you would recommend him with a view to working our numbers here in Europe.
Would you be able to comment favourably or otherwise when you get a minute?
Many thanks
Andy | 2,358 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/371. | FW: November 2001 FERC Open and Special Meeting Notice ,
-----Original Message-----
From: Capitol Connection <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:42 AM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)@ENRON
Subject: November 2001 FERC Open and Special Meeting Notice
OPEN MEETINGS FOR NOVEMBER 2001
The Capitol Connection is pleased to announce that it will broadcast the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Open Meetings on:
Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2001, 10:00 am ET
Tuesday, Nov. 20, 2001, 10:00 am ET
Meeting dates and times are subject to change without notice. For current
information, you can go to our website at www.capitolconnection.org <http://www.capitolconnection.org> for a
link to the FERC's page or you can go to the FERC's web page at
www.ferc.fed.us <http://www.ferc.fed.us>. The FERC Office of the Secretary can be reached at
202.208.0400.
SPECIAL MEETINGS FOR NOVEMBER 2001
The Capitol Connection is pleased to announce that it will broadcast (via
the internet and telephone) the following Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Special Meeting:
Friday, November 2, 9.00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. PST (12:00 noon - 7:00 p.m. EST)
Topic: Western Region's Energy Infrastructure and related matters. This
conference is being held at the WestCoast Grand Hotel in Seattle,
Washington. For the contract for this meeting, please go to our website at
www.capitolconnection.org <http://www.capitolconnection.org>
If you have an annual subscription to the Capitol Connection internet
service, these meetings are included in the annual fee. Please contact us
if you are interested in signing up for either of these meetings or want to
get an annual subscription to our internet service.
The Capitol Connection offers FERC meetings live via the Internet, as well
as via phone bridge, and satellite, please visit our website at
www.capitolconnection.org <http://www.capitolconnection.org>. or send e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> for more
information. If there is a meeting you are interested in receiving, please
call 703-993-3100.
Sincerely,
David Reininger | 2,359 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/372. | ,
Renee,
I wrote "check" as the method of distribution on the form I dropped off last Thursday. I thought it would be more likely for the distribution to be made off-cycle.
However, if the distribution could be made on-cycle I would prefer direct deposit. Is this email sufficient notice or do I need to do something else?
Thank you,
Phillip Allen | 2,360 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/373. | Texas1031_homepage ,
Carlos,
I faxed you a copy of the contract to sell the property in Leander. The title company is Chicago Title Company in Austin. Their address is 1501 S Mopac, Suite 130, Austin, TX 78746. Wendy Butters is the contact person. Her number is (512)480-8353.
Phillip | 2,361 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/374. | ,
Jacques,
Thanks for pulling together the copies of the organization documents. Have you had a chance to gather the title work?
Call or email when you get a chance.
Phillip | 2,362 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/375. | ,
Renee,
Thank you for digging in to the issue of Deferred Phantom Stock Units. It is clear that the payment will be made in shares. However, I still don't understand which date will be used to determine the value and calculate how many shares. The plan document under VII. Amount of Benefit Payments reads "The value of the shares, and resulting payment amount will be based on the closing price of Enron Corp. common stock on the January 1 before the date of payment, and such payment shall be made in shares of Enron Corp. common stock." Can you help me interpret this statement and work through the numbers on my account.
Thank you,
Phillip Allen | 2,363 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/376. | RE: ,
Richard,
I checked with Wink and his prices were slightly lower per square foot but the builder was not keen on the panels Wink is selling because the dimensional lumber to frame windows and doors is not included. So that reduces some of the savings. Either way it still appears that a panel home will cost close to $20,000 more for a 4000 sq ft home. Even if I assume my energy savings will be $125/month, it would take approximately 22 years to recover the upfront cost assuming a 5% interest rate.
Cost is a major concern, but I am also concerned with the comfort level of the upstairs. I am under the impression that the panels will prevent the upstairs from feeling significantly hotter than the downstairs as most two story homes do. What are some other alternatives that would also be effective? Radiant barrier? More attic ventilation?
Thank you for your help.
Phillip Allen
713-853-7041
-----Original Message-----
From: "Morgan, Richard" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:04 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: RE:
Phillip, there are a number of alternative systems that will allow the same
level of energy efficiency. I would wait a bit for Wink's bid though. You
say that your panel costs are $20,000 additional. that sounds like a lot. I
just did a panel house with a 2100 sq ft footprint and the total panel cost
was about $25,000 with 8 inch walls and 10 inch roof. Stay in touch and we
can discuss alternatives if that becomes necessary. If your budget is $85-90
per sq. ft. excluding land costs your costs will be on the low end of the
true custom home level but should be achievable with good management.
Richard Morgan
Manager, Green Building Program
Austin Energy
721 Barton Springs Rd.
Austin, TX 78704-1194
Ph. 512.505.3709
Fax 512.505.3711
e-mail [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:19 AM
To: Morgan, Richard
Subject:
Richard,
I spoke to you earlier this week with questions about building with
SIP's. I am planning to build a home in San Marcos as soon as I can
decide on a builder and materials. I already have my blueprints
completed. What I took from our conversation was to use the SIP's with
8.5" roof panels and use a metal roof.
I have been working with Johnnie Brown, a builder from San Antonio that
is also a Creative Panel rep. The problem is that I have a budget of
$85-$90/sf and it does not appear that he will be able to stay within
that budget. I don't want to settle for a conventional stick built
house. I was wondering about alternatives. Would some combination of a
radiant barrier and non-CFC spray insulation provide close to the same
energy savings at a lower cost than SIP's. For example, I just spoke to
a sales rep for Demilec. He will spray foam insulation at $1.30/sf.
That would be approximately $10,000 compared to over $20,000 additional
costs for the panels. But would the foam insulation be as effective?
Do you have any suggestions of materials or contractors that would help
me construct the best home for the money. I am trying to get a bid from
Wink with Premier based on you reference.
Thank you for your help.
Phillip Allen
[email protected]
713-853-7041
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | 2,364 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/377. | RE: Exchange Documents ,
Jerry,
I had a couple of questions about the exchange.
1. Can I place the replacement property into a limited partnership?
2. The cash to be escrowed is approx. $650K. At money market rates of 3.5% the interest in six months would be over $10K. Will the funds be held in an interest bearing account and will I receive the interest?
3. Should I fed ex all these documents to the title company?
Thank you,
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Caskey <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:13 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Exchange Documents
Mr. Allen:
Would you please sign the exchanges documents where indicated and fax back to us only the signed pages. Wendy Butters will have the buyer sign her set of documents for the closing.
Our fax # is 830-625-1031
Jerry Caskey
Lone Star Exchange Company
- 1031.gif << File: 1031.gif >>
- Phase 1.pdf << File: Phase 1.pdf >> | 2,365 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/378. | RE: Huntley/question ,
Bob,
Let me know how I can help with the variance application.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: Re: Huntley/question
Phillip,
It is looking like we will have to apply for a variance due to a set back
requirement when building over 10 feet tall. Normal set back is 10 feet.
For every 3 ft higher you go, another 5 feet is added to the set back. The
garage would be about 20 ft so we'd normally need to be back about 25 ft.
Currently, it's 13 feet.
I'm going to look into what's involved in getting on the agenda for a
variance. I'll let you know what I find out.
Thanks,
Bob Huntley
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:21 AM
Subject: RE: Huntley/question
> Bob,
>
> I found the warranty deed but I could not find the title policy. I will
> call the title company that we used to get a copy today.
>
> Phillip
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:48 AM
> To: Allen, Phillip K.
> Subject: Re: Huntley/question
>
> Phillip,
>
> Have you found the title policy?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob Huntley
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:08 AM
> Subject: RE: Huntley/question
>
>
> > I will try and find my title policy this evening.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Robert W. Huntley, CFP" <[email protected]>@ENRON
> > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:50 PM
> > To: Allen, Phillip K.
> > Subject: Huntley/question
> >
> >
> > Phillip,
> >
> > Could you please do me a favor? I would like to read your
> current
> > title policy to see what it says about easements. You should
> have
> > received a copy during your closing. I don't know how many
> pages it
> > will be but let me know how you want to handle getting a copy
> made.
> > I'll be happy to make the copy, or whatever makes it easy for
> you.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bob Huntley
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or
> reply
> to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
> all
> copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
not
> be
> relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise.
> Thank you.
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> >
>
>
> | 2,366 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/379. | RE: ,
Renee,
I would like to have a meeting to go over the payment methodology. Scott Neal and Tom Martin would like to attend as well. This afternoon at 2 PM or later would work for us. Please let me know what time we could meet.
Thank you,
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: Ratcliff, Renee
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:19 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.
Subject: RE:
Phillip,
This section pertains to terminated employees who are paid out in the year following the termination event. The way the tax law works, the tax basis for your share distribution will be based on the closing stock price the day preceding notification to the transfer agent. As such, we will distribute net shares calculating the proper withholding at fair market value the day prior to notifying the transfer agent. We will be distributing the shares reflected on your 9/30/01 statement (6,606 shares plus cash for fractional shares). If you would prefer to settle the taxes with a personal check, we can distribute gross shares. Please let me know you preference.
As you know, we are in the process of transferring recordkeeping services from NTRC to Hewitt. As such, we have a CPA, Larry Lewis, working with us to audit and set up transition files. He has become our department expert on the PSA account (much more knowledgeable than myself) and the various plan provision amendments. If you would like, we can set up a conference call with you, myself, and Larry to go over the payment methodology. Please let me know a date and time that is convenient for you.
Thanks,
Renee
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Phillip K.
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:26 AM
To: Ratcliff, Renee
Subject:
Renee,
Thank you for digging in to the issue of Deferred Phantom Stock Units. It is clear that the payment will be made in shares. However, I still don't understand which date will be used to determine the value and calculate how many shares. The plan document under VII. Amount of Benefit Payments reads "The value of the shares, and resulting payment amount will be based on the closing price of Enron Corp. common stock on the January 1 before the date of payment, and such payment shall be made in shares of Enron Corp. common stock." Can you help me interpret this statement and work through the numbers on my account.
Thank you,
Phillip Allen | 2,367 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/380. | FW: Phantom Stock Payouts ,
-----Original Appointment-----
From: Etienne, Bernadette On Behalf Of Butler, Pam
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:35 PM
To: Butler, Pam; Ratcliff, Renee; Martin, Thomas A.; Allen, Phillip K.; Neal, Scott
Subject: Phantom Stock Payouts
When: Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:30 AM-12:30 PM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada); Tijuana.
Where: EB1672
Attendees: Pam Butler
Renee Ratcliff
Larry Lewis
Tom Martin
Scott Neal
Phillip Allen | 2,369 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/381. | ,
Greg,
I faxed you the promotional on 10300 Heritage Office Building with the Nimitz post office. The broker called back shortly after I spoke to you to let me know that the kestrel air park building and the strip center at fm78 & walzem had both sold. Let me know what you think of this property. Also, let me know of any other ideas about replacement property.
Phillip | 2,370 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/382. | ,
Jim,
Take a look at this spreadsheet. I tried to calculate the IRR on the port Aransas and Roma post offices. Is this how your clients usually evaluate these properties? The Roma deal looks much better.
Phillip | 2,371 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/383. | RE: Interface Design Update ,
Mery,
This sounds better than the limitations you were describing in the meeting. We should be able to work with this.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Interface Design Update
Phillip,
The purpose of this e-mail is to explain the results of our discussions
with the technical team after our meeting with you. We need to get your
approval of the points listed below so that we can begin building the
application.
We can have the Position and P&L Reports show the results of the learner's
decisions in previous periods, which will allow the learner move forward in
time with wrong answers. This will achieve our goal of giving the learners
"more rope" and letting them see the results of their mistakes. In order to
achieve this, we will have the following constraints:
The feedback will be fairly high-level, as we discussed in Thursday's
meeting. We will be able to provide feedback on cumulative P&L and
positions, but not about specific actions the learner took in a previous
period. We will not, for example, be able to say things like "In
November, when we were headed into a cold winter, you chose to withdraw
gas. What you should have done was..."
We cannot save the P&L and position numbers. This means that if the
learner leaves the simulation, returns to the main menu, or experiences
a computer crash, his decisions will not be saved and he will need to
start over at time period one.
We cannot have the learner calculate P&L on storage costs,
transportation costs, or hedging instruments. This is because the right
answer and the available answer choices would have to depend on the
decisions the learner has made. Now that the learner can go down any
path he chooses, the number of possible answers is extremely large, and
the right answers are variable. I believe these tasks will be actually
better if we don't have the learner calculate P&L because he has already
calculated P&L numerous times in the structurer/customer scenarios and
conversion and arbitrage scenarios. Furthermore, the type of feedback we
would have to give about specific P&L numbers will not flow well with
the high-level, global-type feedback we are now planning to give in this
task.
We cannot export price numbers into Excel because the Indeliq framework
does not support the downloading of data into external applications. The
technical effort required to add this functionality far exceeds our current
development budget. We can, however, do some calculations for the learner
on the screen. We can also try to somehow allow the learner to make the
mistake of using future prices instead of discounted prices.
If you could please respond with your approval or concerns by end of day
Wednesday, it will allow us to move forward with the development of this
simulation. I would be happy to discuss these points with you; please let
me know if you would like to set up a meeting.
Thank you.
Mery
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited. | 2,372 |
||
allen-p/sent_items/384. | RE: new PO available ,
Jim,
I received your email on the Killeen post office. I am still having a tough time making the math work. Can you prepare a spreadsheet that would show why the post office is such a good investment? Maybe the assumptions I am making about interest rates, expenses, or value at the end of the lease are incorrect.
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: James Wills <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:22 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: new PO available
Phillip,
Hope your trip to Kerrville was worthwhile, and you had a chance to
check out the Heritage Building.
I am writing to tell you about another post office that has just come
back on the market...it's in Killeen, and was under contract for about
30 days. But one of my clients here who was in a 1031 exchange, and had
designated three post offices with us, could only actually buy two, so
today he released this one.
The Killeen post office (Harker Heights, a suburb) is one of the best we
have had in our inventory. It was built by a developer who is a friend
of ours and has been constructing POs for many years. She had to turn
down two other potential buyers recently because it was under contract.
I'm sure it will not last long. I have attached a flyer for you, and can
supply a copy of the lease too. If you are interested, do let me know
soon...we will need to act quickly! With best regards, Jim Wills
- Harker Heights.doc << File: Harker Heights.doc >> | 2,373 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.