Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet
file_path
image
colorpicker_full_path
image
scalebar_full_path
image
SPEI_1y
float64
SPEI_2y
float64
SPEI_30d
float64
public_id
string
eventID
int64
domainID
int64
scientificName
string
siteID
string
collectDate
string
relative_img_loc
string
colorpicker_path
string
scalebar_path
string
-0.71
-0.572
0.552
854913723
727
46
Carabus goryi
8
2017-07-11
854913723.png
colorpicker_1672529627.png
scalebar_1672529627.png
1.69
2.09
0.074
347472321
203
3
Pterostichus coracinus
24
2019-08-29
347472321.png
colorpicker_168205273.png
scalebar_168205273.png
1.45
1.01
1.442
2978263291
122
3
Chlaenius aestivus
2
2018-07-03
2978263291.png
colorpicker_2862281417.png
scalebar_2862281417.png
-0.9
-0.71
-0.39
1290955733
1,404
202
Pasimachus elongatus
30
2018-06-14
1290955733.png
colorpicker_2115179197.png
scalebar_2115179197.png
0.668
1.13
0.168
3303810999
777
46
Carabus goryi
8
2022-06-21
3303810999.png
colorpicker_1758976511.png
scalebar_1758976511.png
1.01
0.8
0.63
2347702939
1,417
202
Amara carinata
30
2019-07-24
2347702939.png
colorpicker_178325187.png
scalebar_178325187.png
0.776
0.944
1.85
4258269555
185
3
Chlaenius aestivus
24
2018-06-21
4258269555.png
colorpicker_792718059.png
scalebar_792718059.png
0.184
0.8
-2.09
2796104839
328
1
Pasimachus sublaevis
7
2019-10-08
2796104839.png
colorpicker_2268128373.png
scalebar_2268128373.png
0.23
0.03
-0.58
1792583849
902
46
Chlaenius emarginatus
21
2022-06-22
1792583849.png
colorpicker_179770889.png
scalebar_179770889.png
0.47
-0.42
-0.156
1372709319
924
7
Dicaelus furvus furvus
6
2018-04-09
1372709319.png
colorpicker_1888794455.png
scalebar_1888794455.png
-1.69
-1.642
-1.012
1776385891
1,778
99
Dicheirus piceus
26
2021-04-14 04:00:00
1776385891.png
colorpicker_3486794203.png
scalebar_3486794203.png
0.348
-0.142
0.992
1247258959
1,808
99
Pterostichus ordinarius
27
2019-05-22
1247258959.png
colorpicker_3753658601.png
scalebar_3753658601.png
-0.128
1.13
0.312
2618283493
426
32
Pterostichus novus
29
2021-07-27
2618283493.png
colorpicker_2755594705.png
scalebar_2755594705.png
0.512
0.71
0.54
2752703301
230
3
Chlaenius aestivus
24
2022-06-16
2752703301.png
colorpicker_3103123179.png
scalebar_3103123179.png
-0.24
1.642
0.71
2302621419
401
32
Pterostichus melanarius melanarius
29
2018-07-10
2302621419.png
colorpicker_3378661789.png
scalebar_3378661789.png
2.09
1.706
-0.128
2609344523
489
32
Pterostichus melanarius melanarius
35
2019-08-21
2609344523.png
colorpicker_1309098431.png
scalebar_1309098431.png
2.09
2.09
0.71
1181611897
80
4
Carabus serratus
9
2019-07-30
1181611897.png
colorpicker_191336505.png
scalebar_191336505.png
0.782
0.63
-0.404
3868785245
1,010
7
Brachinus alternans
14
2019-08-14 04:00:00
3868785245.png
colorpicker_3633960571.png
scalebar_3633960571.png
0.38
0.534
-0.198
70518487
170
3
Harpalus protractus
2
2022-07-26
70518487.png
colorpicker_3867573823.png
scalebar_3867573823.png
1.45
1.01
1.442
638323181
122
3
Cyclotrachelus furtivus
2
2018-07-03
638323181.png
colorpicker_1066810967.png
scalebar_1066810967.png
-0.39
0.03
-1.01
4049467517
554
11
Poecilus chalcites
12
2021-08-18
4049467517.png
colorpicker_1904697177.png
scalebar_1904697177.png
0.17
-0.46
-1.01
461682779
735
46
Pasimachus punctulatus
8
2018-05-15
461682779.png
colorpicker_4125764009.png
scalebar_4125764009.png
0.664
0.018
0.866
462598965
930
7
Scarites subterraneus
6
2018-06-18
462598965.png
colorpicker_3026796209.png
scalebar_3026796209.png
0.786
0.438
0.17
2797815299
743
46
Carabus goryi
8
2018-09-04
2797815299.png
colorpicker_3258963759.png
scalebar_3258963759.png
-0.36
-0.39
0.04
3990814685
1,405
202
Pasimachus elongatus
30
2018-06-28
3990814685.png
colorpicker_2115179197.png
scalebar_2115179197.png
0.54
1.28
-2.09
3727136927
1,183
9
Pasimachus elongatus
18
2020-06-23
3727136927.png
colorpicker_817294993.png
scalebar_817294993.png
2.09
2.09
-0.116
1515833817
77
4
Pterostichus pensylvanicus
9
2019-06-18
1515833817.png
colorpicker_3155168451.png
scalebar_3155168451.png
-0.36
-0.39
0.04
497295813
1,405
202
Harpalus desertus
30
2018-06-28
497295813.png
colorpicker_397481419.png
scalebar_397481419.png
-0.54
-0.8
-0.9
3363054303
67
4
Carabus goryi
9
2018-06-19
3363054303.png
colorpicker_3975706237.png
scalebar_3975706237.png
0.71
-0.018
1.106
2732758709
1,408
202
Harpalus paratus
30
2018-09-06
2732758709.png
colorpicker_3253180951.png
scalebar_3253180951.png
1.16
1.642
1.69
1984862215
780
46
Pterostichus acutipes acutipes
8
2022-08-02
1984862215.png
colorpicker_166759571.png
scalebar_166759571.png
1.064
2.09
-0.06
3392915007
955
7
Galerita bicolor
6
2021-08-24
3392915007.png
colorpicker_2777280235.png
scalebar_2777280235.png
-1.69
-1.13
0.32
299764155
1,329
202
Amara confusa
4
2022-08-03
299764155.png
colorpicker_2728126367.png
scalebar_2728126367.png
0.642
-0.348
0.58
1306003225
733
46
Carabus goryi
8
2018-04-17
1306003225.png
colorpicker_3232941123.png
scalebar_3232941123.png
2.09
2.09
2.09
2491356953
74
4
Carabus goryi
9
2019-05-07
2491356953.png
colorpicker_699042665.png
scalebar_699042665.png
0.47
0.086
0.144
2953126363
901
46
Cyclotrachelus fucatus
21
2022-06-08
2953126363.png
colorpicker_3022459103.png
scalebar_3022459103.png
0.302
0.944
-0.82
4083899607
1,186
9
Cyclotrachelus torvus
18
2020-08-04
4083899607.png
colorpicker_670128625.png
scalebar_670128625.png
1.13
1.01
1.69
1848110997
72
4
Synuchus impunctatus
9
2018-08-28
1848110997.png
colorpicker_554767701.png
scalebar_554767701.png
2.09
2.09
0.376
911000865
200
3
Chlaenius aestivus
24
2019-07-18
911000865.png
colorpicker_3384444597.png
scalebar_3384444597.png
0.17
-0.32
-0.27
3750563395
1,806
99
Scaphinotus oreophilus
27
2019-04-24
3750563395.png
colorpicker_1401328123.png
scalebar_1401328123.png
1.314
2.09
0.394
3209545133
418
32
Pterostichus melanarius melanarius
29
2020-07-14
3209545133.png
colorpicker_818740695.png
scalebar_818740695.png
0.156
-0.144
-0.284
3403238723
1,278
202
Harpalus desertus
4
2018-04-26
3403238723.png
colorpicker_1008982887.png
scalebar_1008982887.png
0.142
2.01
0.48
1491613075
403
32
Pterostichus novus
29
2018-08-07
1491613075.png
colorpicker_3136374325.png
scalebar_3136374325.png
0.9
0.9
1.45
1620484355
121
3
Cyclotrachelus furtivus
2
2018-06-19
1620484355.png
colorpicker_1066810967.png
scalebar_1066810967.png
-1.834
-1.082
1.514
1389792985
522
11
Harpalus pensylvanicus
12
2018-08-30
1389792985.png
colorpicker_188445101.png
scalebar_188445101.png
-0.39
-0.39
0.17
671930519
434
32
Synuchus impunctatus
29
2022-08-23
671930519.png
colorpicker_1800901869.png
scalebar_1800901869.png
0.8
2.09
0.156
2088036573
766
46
Galerita bicolor
8
2021-07-06 04:00:00
2088036573.png
colorpicker_38387329.png
scalebar_38387329.png
1.93
1.69
1.574
2546588865
190
3
Cyclotrachelus sigillatus
24
2018-08-30
2546588865.png
colorpicker_1029222715.png
scalebar_1029222715.png
-0.1
-0.46
-0.9
3627353011
1,284
202
Pasimachus elongatus
4
2018-07-19
3627353011.png
colorpicker_321154449.png
scalebar_321154449.png
0.306
1.608
1.898
1030464615
894
46
Cyclotrachelus sigillatus
21
2021-09-01
1030464615.png
colorpicker_3955466409.png
scalebar_3955466409.png
1.93
2.09
0.198
2016046709
202
3
Chlaenius emarginatus
24
2019-08-15
2016046709.png
colorpicker_436515373.png
scalebar_436515373.png
1.28
1.13
0.17
609704377
1,178
9
Pasimachus elongatus
18
2019-07-09
609704377.png
colorpicker_4072273035.png
scalebar_4072273035.png
0.06
-0.46
-0.198
1463289507
1,283
202
Discoderus parallelus
4
2018-07-05
1463289507.png
colorpicker_2363249469.png
scalebar_2363249469.png
0.866
2.09
0.458
1892897281
479
32
Synuchus impunctatus
35
2018-07-25
1892897281.png
colorpicker_3219929805.png
scalebar_3219929805.png
1.69
0.8
2.09
4123524033
536
11
Poecilus chalcites
12
2019-08-28
4123524033.png
colorpicker_3483902799.png
scalebar_3483902799.png
2.09
2.09
0.47
2641119489
487
32
Pterostichus melanarius melanarius
35
2019-07-24
2641119489.png
colorpicker_906633281.png
scalebar_906633281.png
-1.69
-0.692
-1.554
1495033995
718
11
Brachinus alternans
34
2023-06-28
1495033995.png
colorpicker_2657582205.png
scalebar_2657582205.png
1.498
-0.086
1.608
3386541727
529
11
Poecilus chalcites
12
2019-06-05
3386541727.png
colorpicker_3483902799.png
scalebar_3483902799.png
0.54
0.03
-0.17
1517045239
900
46
Cyclotrachelus sodalis sodalis
21
2022-05-25
1517045239.png
colorpicker_3276312183.png
scalebar_3276312183.png
0.9
0.17
-0.54
1172377691
1,412
202
Harpalus desertus
30
2019-05-15
1172377691.png
colorpicker_4000283171.png
scalebar_4000283171.png
-1.69
-1.13
0.32
621035713
1,329
202
Harpalus desertus
4
2022-08-03
621035713.png
colorpicker_2888304053.png
scalebar_2888304053.png
-0.39
0.03
-1.01
1159926367
554
11
Pasimachus elongatus
12
2021-08-18
1159926367.png
colorpicker_1153257851.png
scalebar_1153257851.png
0.738
1.354
1.69
603952047
776
46
Carabus goryi
8
2022-06-07
603952047.png
colorpicker_1758976511.png
scalebar_1758976511.png
0.8
2.09
0.156
2861782379
766
46
Carabus goryi
8
2021-07-06
2861782379.png
colorpicker_688922751.png
scalebar_688922751.png
0.17
0.612
1.962
68248033
786
46
Pterostichus acutipes acutipes
8
2023-08-29
68248033.png
colorpicker_2659027907.png
scalebar_2659027907.png
-0.71
0.17
-0.03
3479891407
1,304
202
Harpalus desertus
4
2020-07-08
3479891407.png
colorpicker_1893131561.png
scalebar_1893131561.png
-0.39
0.71
-1.604
328739151
1,801
99
Pterostichus ordinarius
27
2018-07-16
328739151.png
colorpicker_3091557563.png
scalebar_3091557563.png
0.086
-0.17
0.988
600174935
1,280
202
Pasimachus elongatus
4
2018-05-24
600174935.png
colorpicker_1288858603.png
scalebar_1288858603.png
0.728
-0.39
-0.988
70488009
102
4
Sphaeroderus stenostomus lecontei
9
2022-06-15
70488009.png
colorpicker_559104807.png
scalebar_559104807.png
1.28
1.13
0.17
3931510425
1,178
9
Cyclotrachelus torvus
18
2019-07-09
3931510425.png
colorpicker_3397455915.png
scalebar_3397455915.png
-0.376
1.28
-0.878
2046111215
505
32
Pterostichus melanarius melanarius
35
2021-08-25
2046111215.png
colorpicker_1053799649.png
scalebar_1053799649.png
-0.71
0.17
-0.03
615548141
1,304
202
Pasimachus elongatus
4
2020-07-08
615548141.png
colorpicker_2889749755.png
scalebar_2889749755.png
0.88
0.17
1.69
1795444775
741
46
Sphaeroderus stenostomus lecontei
8
2018-08-07
1795444775.png
colorpicker_208684929.png
scalebar_208684929.png
0.438
0.03
0.054
2276863541
213
3
Chlaenius aestivus
24
2021-04-22
2276863541.png
colorpicker_2635896675.png
scalebar_2635896675.png
0.8
1.69
0.03
2723850217
768
46
Carabus goryi
8
2021-08-03 04:00:00
2723850217.png
colorpicker_3266192269.png
scalebar_3266192269.png
2.09
2.09
-0.276
2268128373
865
46
Cyclotrachelus fucatus
21
2019-04-17
2268128373.png
colorpicker_4199199575.png
scalebar_4199199575.png
-0.8
0.518
-0.146
2340413473
88
4
Synuchus impunctatus
9
2020-09-09
2340413473.png
colorpicker_2380597893.png
scalebar_2380597893.png
0.17
0.612
1.962
3258464721
786
46
Pterostichus acutipes acutipes
8
2023-08-29
3258464721.png
colorpicker_2659027907.png
scalebar_2659027907.png
0.786
1.85
-0.674
2584472353
540
11
Cyclotrachelus sodalis colossus
12
2020-07-01
2584472353.png
colorpicker_3393118809.png
scalebar_3393118809.png
-0.656
-0.17
0.438
252941697
1,234
9
Harpalus opacipennis
36
2018-06-26
252941697.png
colorpicker_3892150757.png
scalebar_3892150757.png
1.13
0.86
1.01
1545928801
943
7
Scarites subterraneus
6
2019-07-01
1545928801.png
colorpicker_1174943381.png
scalebar_1174943381.png
-0.8
-0.54
0.9
2393934925
724
46
Carabus goryi
8
2017-05-30
2393934925.png
colorpicker_2536438473.png
scalebar_2536438473.png
0.8
2.09
0.444
2916688577
541
11
Harpalus pensylvanicus
12
2020-07-15
2916688577.png
colorpicker_3733418773.png
scalebar_3733418773.png
-0.492
-0.24
-0.264
1127856165
1,162
9
Cyclotrachelus torvus
18
2018-05-08
1127856165.png
colorpicker_2606982635.png
scalebar_2606982635.png
1.69
0.786
0.246
1946093019
534
11
Poecilus chalcites
12
2019-07-31
1946093019.png
colorpicker_3622394955.png
scalebar_3622394955.png
0.32
-0.71
-1.69
2975636645
1,323
202
Cymindis planipennis
4
2021-10-13
2975636645.png
colorpicker_823077801.png
scalebar_823077801.png
1.01
2.09
1.444
3610595059
478
32
Synuchus impunctatus
35
2018-07-11
3610595059.png
colorpicker_3219929805.png
scalebar_3219929805.png
0.074
1.69
0.144
179770889
889
46
Cyclotrachelus fucatus
21
2021-06-23
179770889.png
colorpicker_2859390013.png
scalebar_2859390013.png
0.156
0.42
1.416
1862537539
166
3
Pterostichus trinarius
2
2022-05-31 04:00:00
1862537539.png
colorpicker_1147475043.png
scalebar_1147475043.png
0.226
-0.39
0.248
1488721671
736
46
Sphaeroderus stenostomus lecontei
8
2018-05-29
1488721671.png
colorpicker_3721853157.png
scalebar_3721853157.png
-0.212
-0.46
-1.69
1397907203
627
11
Cyclotrachelus sodalis colossus
34
2018-06-12
1397907203.png
colorpicker_332720065.png
scalebar_332720065.png
-0.39
-0.39
0.17
3004021169
434
32
Synuchus impunctatus
29
2022-08-23
3004021169.png
colorpicker_1800901869.png
scalebar_1800901869.png
1.382
2.09
0.992
3460506809
676
11
Brachinus alternans
34
2020-08-04
3460506809.png
colorpicker_1532591769.png
scalebar_1532591769.png
0.47
-0.03
0.156
3059487361
1,812
99
Anisodactylus similis
27
2019-07-17
3059487361.png
colorpicker_546093489.png
scalebar_546093489.png
-1.13
-1.13
-0.842
1851236681
1,325
202
Piosoma setosum
4
2022-06-08
1851236681.png
colorpicker_2990653659.png
scalebar_2990653659.png
0.946
0.17
0.07
2097006021
1,174
9
Cyclotrachelus torvus
18
2019-05-14
2097006021.png
colorpicker_3956912111.png
scalebar_3956912111.png
0.348
-0.142
0.992
267398717
1,808
99
Omus californicus
27
2019-05-22
267398717.png
colorpicker_941330129.png
scalebar_941330129.png
0.272
1.28
0.142
4131577295
504
32
Pterostichus melanarius melanarius
35
2021-08-11
4131577295.png
colorpicker_1053799649.png
scalebar_1053799649.png
0.594
0.258
1.69
1136499899
223
3
Cyclotrachelus sigillatus
24
2021-09-09
1136499899.png
colorpicker_3620949253.png
scalebar_3620949253.png
1.01
2.09
1.444
3709167553
478
32
Pterostichus pensylvanicus
35
2018-07-11 04:00:00
3709167553.png
colorpicker_1803793273.png
scalebar_1803793273.png
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Dataset Card for Beetles as Sentinel Taxa: Predicting drought conditions from NEON specimen imagery

This dataset contains images of pinned carabid beetle specimens collected by the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) from ecological sites across the U.S., along with associated metadata and drought severity indices (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)). It was developed to for the second HDR ML Challenge, and is intended to support the development of machine learning models to predict environmental conditions—specifically drought status—from organismal traits captured in specimen imagery.

Dataset Details

This dataset contains high-resolution images and metadata for pinned specimens of carabid beetles collected across U.S. ecosystems by the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). Each image is linked to specimen-level metadata (e.g., collection date, site, taxonomic identification) and environmental context, including drought severity indicators (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)) calculated over multiple timescales using remote sensing data. This dataset is designed to support research on the relationship between ecological traits and climate stress, and is intended for training and evaluating machine learning models that predict environmental conditions-particularly drought status—from biological imagery. It was created for the Imageomics portion of the second HDR ML Challenge, which emphasizes model generalization across sites with different climates, land cover types, and beetle species pools. Not all available information is provided as part of the challenge, but it will be added at the end of the challenge to allow for broader use beyond the challenge. This includes smaller beetles, which were entirely excluded from the challenge, but will be added to this dataset later.

Supported Tasks and Leaderboards

Leaderboard is available on the Codabench Challenge page.

Dataset Structure

/dataset/
    color_and_scale_images/
        colorpicker_<colorpicker_id 1>.png
        colorpicker_<colorpicker_id 2>.png
        ...
        colorpicker_<colorpicker_id k>.png
        scalebar_<scalebarid 1>.png
        scalebar_<scalebarid 2>.png
        ...
        scalebar_<scalebarid k>.png
    data/
        train-00000-of-00029.parquet
        train-00001-of-00029.parquet
        ...
        train-00028-of-00029.parquet
        validation-00000-of-00004.parquet
        ...
        validation-00003-of-00004.parquet
    flattened_images/
        <img_id 1>.png
        <img_id 2>.png
        ...
        <img_id n>.png
    train.csv
    val.csv

Data Instances

Each record in train.csv or val.csv corresponds to a single pinned carabid beetle specimen collected by NEON staff as part of the "Ground beetles sampled from pitfall traps" data product (DP1.10022.001). There are a maximum of 13 field season collection bouts per year, with carabids collected from no more than 10 plotIDs per bout. For data collected prior to 2018, each plot will yield no more than 4 samples per bout of collection, resulting in a maximum of 520 plot‐bouts per site per year. For collections 2018 and later, each plot yields a maximum of 3 samples within each bout. The number of individuals identified varies with the abundance of organisms at the site. Beetles were imaged in the trays in which they were pinned, which correspond to their taxonomic designations; individuals were cropped from the group images, and saved in flatten_images/. As a result of this imaging process, each color palette and scalebar image corresponds to more than one beetle image (alignment is described below).

Metadata include an identifier for a collection event (eventID), the date of the collection event (collectDate), an anonymized identifier of the domain (domainID) and site (siteID) where the collection event took place, taxonomic information (scientificName), unique beetle image identifier (public_id), a link to the beetle image file (relative_img_loc), a link to the color palette image (colorpicker_path), a link to the scale image (scalebar_path), and Standardized Precipication Evapotranspiratoin Index (SPEI) values that correspond with the location and time that the specimen was collected. The SPEI values were calculated for the 30 day (SPEI_30d), 1 year (SPEI_1y), and 2 year (SPEI_2y) time windows preceding the time of collection at each location for each beetle specimen in the dataset.

The train.csv and val.csv files are to be used for training models for submission and reflect the information that will be given during testing sans siteID, collectDate, and the target variables SPEI_30d, SPEI_1y, and SPEI_2y. Please see the challenge sample repository for an example of how these were used in training the baseline submission.

The data/ folder contains the dataset in parquet format, where train prefix indicates it corresponds to the images and metadata in train.csv, while validation corresponds to val.csv. These are rendered by the dataset viewer.

Data Fields

Both train.csv and val.csv have the following columns.

fieldName description dataType relatedTerms
eventID An (anonymized) identifier for the set of information associated with the event, which includes information about the place and time of the event string DWC_v2009-04-24:eventID
collectDate Date of the collection event dateTime DWC_v2009-04-24:eventDate
domainID Unique identifier (anonymized) of the NEON domain string DWC_v2009-04-24:locationID
siteID NEON site code (anonymized), each domain has 1-3 sites string DWC_v2009-04-24:locationID
scientificName Scientific name, associated with the taxonID. This is the name of the lowest level taxonomic rank that can be determined string DWC_v2009-04-24:scientificName
public_id Unique identifier for each beetle image string
relative_img_loc Beetle image location within the beetle images folder (flattened_images) string
colorpicker_path Color card image location within the color card and scale images folder (color_and_scale_images) string
scalebar_path Scale image location within the color card and scale images folder (color_and_scale_images) string
SPEI_30d Target variable: SPEI calculated over a short timescale (1 month), reflecting short-term moisture conditions. real
SPEI_1y Target variable: SPEI calculated over a medium timescale (1 year), reflecting seasonal precipitation patterns. real
SPEI_2y Target variable: SPEI calculated over a long timescale (2 years), reflecting long-term hydrological conditions. real

Data Splits

fictional map to visualize the data splits as described below (there are 1-3 sites per domain, where each domain represents a region that is reasonably climactically consistent)
Figure 1. Fictional depiction of data distribution and splits across domains. Image was created with Microsoft CoPilot + manual editing.

Using the image above as a guide, the data has been split in the following way:

In-distribution v. Out-of-distribution

All domains were split into two sets: one for out-of-distribution (OOD) testing (see domains with purple sites) and one for in-distribution (ID) testing and training (see domains with blue and/or pink sites). Each domain represents a different region, so the OOD set may contain beetle species unique to that region not found in the ID set.

Training v. Testing (ID)

All domains contain up to three sites where collection events of beetles took place. Each collection event is defined by when it took place (collectDate) and where (siteID). All ID domains were split based on their sites into training and testing (ID). If a domain only contained one site, then all events from that site were placed in training. If a domain contained more than one, then one site was held out for testing (ID) and all others were placed in training.

Training v. Validation

During our preliminary experiments we extract a validation set out of the training set for early stopping in training. This split is what is made publicly available in the train.csv and val.csv files for training and validation respectively.

Initial phase v. Challenge phase

The testing sets currently contain two subsets: an ID set (images from sites whose domain was seen in training), and an OOD set which has images from domains unique to the test set. Both the ID and OOD sets were split in half for the two phases of our competition. The initial (development) phase of the competition will evaluate all submitted models on one half only. These will be represented by the private files seen_domain.csv and unseen_domain.csv for ID and OOD, respectively. Around the end of the competition, we will also evaluate all submitted models on the other half, which is contained in the private files seen_domain_challenge.csv and seen_domain_challenge.csv.

The most metadata will be provided for the training dataset; siteID, collectDate and the target variables values will be redacted for the challenge dataset. Only images and unredacted metadata will be provided. The challenge will be to recover the target variable values for given collections of beetle images from given site-date combinations. All data will be released at the end of the challenge.

Dataset Creation

Curation Rationale

Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of drought events globally, posing significant threats to ecosystems, agriculture, water resources, and human societies (IPCC, 2022). Effective monitoring and prediction of drought conditions are crucial for mitigation and adaptation strategies. While traditional drought monitoring relies on meteorological and hydrological data, ecological indicators can provide complementary insights into ecologically significant on-the-ground impacts of water stress. Insects, particularly ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), are well-established bioindicators due to their sensitivity to environmental changes (including moisture availability), high diversity, and relative ease of sampling (Lövei and Sunderland 1996; Rainio & Niemelä, 2003). This widespread beetle family has been used to evaluate changes in landscape and local environmental conditions following natural and anthropogenic disturbances, including climate change (Muller-Kroehling et al. 2014; Qiu et al. 2023) and drought (Weiss et al. 2024a,b). While responses to these disturbances can be captured by changes in their abundance and composition, morphological and ecological traits are increasingly used to characterize communities because they give insight into why species respond to change (Cadotte et al. 2015; Fountain-Jones et al. 2015; Moretti et al. 2017).

The National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) provides unprecedented, standardized ecological data across the United States, including systematic collections of carabid beetles from diverse terrestrial ecosystems (Thorpe et al., 2016). These collections, housed in the NEON Biorepository, include high-resolution images of individual specimens. This dataset was curated for the Imageomics sub-challenge of the Second HDR ML Challenge in partnership with NEON to leverage this unique resource for exploration of a novel approach to environmental monitoring. We hope that it will further serve the community for research beyond the challenge as well.

Impact: This challenge aims to:

  • Develop novel AI/ML methods to detect ecologically significant drought from imagery data of a sentinel taxon (carabid beetles).
  • Assess the potential of carabid beetles as fine-grained indicators of drought stress across different ecosystems and timescales.
  • Promote the use of NEON data and stimulate interdisciplinary research between ecology, climate science, and machine learning.
  • Contribute insights relevant to water resource management, agricultural planning, and biodiversity conservation under changing climate conditions.

Novelty: This competition presents several novel aspects:

  • Image-based Environmental Prediction: It moves beyond traditional species counts or abundance data, tasking participants with extracting ecologically relevant signals directly from images of preserved specimens to predict a key environmental variable (drought).
  • Phenotypic Trait Signal: We hypothesize that subtle variations in beetle morphology (e.g., body size variation within or among species, fluctuating asymmetry as indicators of stress) captured in images may correlate with environmental conditions like drought (Orzack & Sober, 1994). This challenge encourages models that implicitly or explicitly learn these trait-environment linkages.
  • Out-of-Sample Generalization (Transferability): A core novelty and challenge is testing model transferability. Models will be trained on data from specific NEON sites/biomes and tested on sites with distinct ecological characteristics and potentially different species pools. This directly addresses a critical question in ecological modeling and AI: can models generalize predictions to novel environments?
  • Multi-Timescale Drought Response: By targeting the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) calculated over short (30 day), medium (1 year), and long (2 year) timescales, the challenge will provide insights into which aspects of drought (e.g., short-term soil moisture deficits vs. long-term hydrological drought) are most strongly reflected in beetle communities and potentially their morphology, and over what timescales these ecological responses are most pronounced.

Source Data

This dataset consists of images of pinned carabid beetle specimens taken in 2025 at the NEON Biorepository by two interns (Leah Cotton and Jacqueline Dominguez). A subset of these images were taken at an earlier date by Michael Belitz, who provided his images for inclusion in this dataset. The interns were trained by Alyson East and supervised by both her and Isabelle Betancourt.

IMPORTANT: Only a subset of the specimens that are collected on a given plot-date combination are pinned. All taxa for which there are fewer than 10 individuals on a given plot-date are pinned. If there are 10 or more individuals on a particular plot-date combination, then the specimens are placed in bulk storage (not pinned) and not available for imaging (for the purposes of this project). Furthermore, this release of the data is not a representative sample of community or body size distributions (small beetles are specifically missing from this dataset due to imaging timeline and technical constraints).

Data Collection and Processing

Specimen collection:
NEON beetle specimens were collected using pitfall traps—16 oz deli containers filled with 150 mL or 250 mL of propylene glycol. Three traps were deployed at 10 distributed base plots per site for two-week periods throughout the growing season. Traps were positioned at the East, West, and South edges of the plots (20 meters from center). After field collection, arthropod samples were sorted in the lab. Carabid beetles were identified to species where possible. A subset of these were pinned or pointed, and from those, some were forwarded for taxonomic review or DNA barcoding. Beetles are pinned in trays, and organized into these trays based on the taxonomic labeling, species identification, domain ID, and collection year. There are known instances of errors in tray organization where there are multiple species, years. or domains in one tray. Thus, inclusion in the same tray is usually, but not always indicative of matching taxonomy, collection year, or domain. Theses errors are corrected in the individual metadata records.

Imaging workflow:

fictional drawer containing beetles of the same species, a color calibration card, and a scale. The beetles may be collected from separate events.
Figure 2. Artificial depiction of a drawer containing one species of beetles with a color calibration card and a scalebar. Image was created with Microsoft CoPilot + manual editing.

Beetles were imaged in bulk (by tray) with a color palette and scalebar included in the image for later standardization. As noted above, beetles from different events may be in the same trays and same event in different trays based on labeling, so use the colorpicker_path and scalbar_path indicators to ensure proper alignment. The scalebars were placed at the same height as the pinned specimens in the tray to ensure consistent distance from the camera.

Pinned beetle specimens were photographed using high-resolution cameras to capture full museum trays containing multiple specimens. Individual specimen images were extracted from these tray photos using a custom image processing pipeline based on object detection and instance cropping. This pipeline detects and isolates each beetle image with its bounding region, standardizes its dimensions, and assigns the associated sample ID (public_id in this dataset). The processing workflow and code are available at: https://github.com/Imageomics/CarabidImaging (NOTE: this repository will be made publicly available at the end of the challenge, since it contains information relating to the test data). Each extracted image was then linked to the individual metadata provided by the Biorepository.

Metadata extraction:
Metadata for imaged specimens (filtered by sampleID) were downloaded using the neonUtilities R package from the NEON data portal. These records include collection details, site codes, specimen identifiers, taxonomy, and geospatial context. Note that this information is intentionally excluded from or anonymized in the challenge data, but will be added back following the completion of the challenge.

Drought variable processing:
SPEI (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index) values were queried from the GRIDMET Drought image collection using Google Earth Engine. These data were exported as tables and merged with specimen metadata by site coordinates and collection date. SPEI values represent conditions over three time windows: 30 days (short-term), 1 year (seasonal), and 2 years (long-term). GRIDMET pixel resolution is ~4 km × 4 km. For details, see Abatzoglou (2012).

Site-level metadata:
NEON site metadata was retrieved on June 25, 2025 from NEON’s public API and exported via their field site metadata download: NEON_Field_Site_Metadata_20250625. It represents a flattened subset of the full JSON objects returned by the API endpoint (https://data.neonscience.org/api/v0/locations/sites).

Who are the source data producers?

These metadata records correspond with specimens collected by NEON staff for the "Ground beetles sampled from pitfall traps" data product (DP1.10022.001), which are housed at the NEON Biorepository.

The SPEI values were queried from the GRIDMET Drought image collection for each NEON terrestrial site. Note the spatial resolution of pixels in the GRIDMET data product is spatial resolution of ~ 4 km x 4 km (16 km^2). See Abatzoglou (2012) for more details about this dataset.

Images were taken by interns Leah Cotton and Jacqueline Dominguez, under the direction of Alyson East and Isabelle Betancourt. A subset of these images were also taken by Michael Belitz with a Canon EOS Rebel T7.

Annotations

All beetle metadata was provided by the NEON Biorepository. Taxonomic labels were provided by a mix of experts (museum curator with taxonomic expertise) and parataxonomists (domain field scientist).

Personal and Sensitive Information

This dataset may include records of rare, threatened, or endangered carabid beetle species. To comply with local, state, and federal conservation laws and data sensitivity policies, scientific names for certain protected taxa have been intentionally obfuscated or generalized in the metadata (i.e., the genus may be provided without the species epithet). These measures are intended to reduce the risk of over-collection, disturbance, or exploitation of sensitive species or habitats. Users should be aware that species-level identifications may be incomplete or masked for specimens collected in jurisdictions where such protections are enforced.

Considerations for Using the Data

This is a training dataset for an ML Challenge, whose goal is to recover SPEI values at the spatial resolution of a NEON site. The SPEI values are derived from remote sensing data and have a spatial resolution of ~ 4 x 4 km (16 km^2), which is similar in scale to the area of an entire NEON site. Individual beetles are collected from traps placed along 40 x 40 m plots arranged throughout the NEON site, stratified to represent the relative dominance of the available National Land Cover Database (NLCD) types at the site. In the metadata, individual beetle specimen records are mapped to the corresponding site-level information form a sampling event. Thus, the geospatial data correspond with the larger NEON site, and not the exact location at which the beetle specimen was collected. For this challenge, it is hypothesized that emergent properties of the beetle community at a site will be correlated with the site drought status.

Bias, Risks, and Limitations

This release of the data is not a representative sample of community or body size distributions for their sites. This dataset consists only of pinned specimens from the NEON Biorepository that were sufficiently large to not require adjustments within their boxes. Smaller beetles will be added at a later date, though they will not be included in the challenge.

Furthermore, as mentioned above, only a subset of beetle specimens that are collected during a sampling event are imaged, and included in this dataset. If common taxa have high abundances for a given plot-date (a pooled set of traps from the same plot-date), they are archived in bulk storage and not available to be imaged. Thus, very abundant taxa are not included in this dataset for plot-dates for which their counts were 10 or more.

Recommendations

In its current form, this dataset is intended only for use as the training dataset in the Beetles as Sentinel Taxa Scientific-Mood ML Challenge. More detailed environmental data has been excluded and crucial identifiers have been anonymized for the challenge. After the challenge, this information will be added to the dataset so that it may be used for further scientific endeavors. We recommend waiting until this dataset has been updated with the full information to use it for anything beyond the ML Challenge.

Licensing Information

CC BY (Attribution)

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Citation

BibTeX:

Data

@misc{<ref_code>,
  author = {Alyson East and Michael Belitz and Leah Cotton and Jacqueline Dominguez and Isabelle Betancourt and 
    S M Rayeed and Fangxun Liu and David Carlyn and Connor Kilrain and Jiaman Wu and Chandra Earl and Hilmar Lapp 
    and Kayla I. Perry and Charles Stewart and Matthew J. Thompson and Elizabeth G. Campolongo and Wei-Lun Chao and
    Eric R. Sokol and Sydne Record},
  title = {Beetles as Sentinel Taxa: Predicting drought conditions from NEON specimen imagery},
  year = {2025},
  url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/imageomics/sentinel-beetles},
  doi = {<doi once generated>},
  publisher = {Hugging Face}
}

Please be sure to also cite the original data source(s):

NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network). NEON Ground beetles sampled from pitfall traps (DP1.10022.001), RELEASE-2025. https://doi.org/10.48443/tx5f-dy17. Dataset accessed from https://data.neonscience.org/data-products/DP1.10022.001/RELEASE-2025 on August 1, 2025

NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network). NEON Field Site Metadata. https://www.neonscience.org/field-sites/exports/NEON_Field_Site_Metadata_20250625. Dataset accessed from https://data.neonscience.org/api/v0/locations/sites on June 25, 2025

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Imageomics Institute, which is funded by the US National Science Foundation's Harnessing the Data Revolution (HDR) program under Award #2118240 (Imageomics: A New Frontier of Biological Information Powered by Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning). This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), a program sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and operated under cooperative agreement by Battelle.

S. Record and A. East were additionally supported by the US National Science Foundation's Award No. 242918 and by Hatch project Award #MEO-022425 from the US Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. M. Belitz was additionally supported by the US National Science Foundation's Award #2410152.

Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or US Department of Agriculture.

More Information

The HDR ML Challenge program is hosting its second FAIR challenge, this year presenting three scientific benchmarks for modeling out of distribution in three critical areas: Neural Forecasting, Climate Prediction using Ecological Data, and Coastal Flooding Prediction over time. This dataset is one of those three challenges and has been created in a collaboration between the Imageomics Institute and NEON.

Dataset Card Authors

Dataset Card Contact

We encourage those with questions regarding the dataset to open a discussion in the Community tab.

Downloads last month
405