text
stringlengths 0
1.96k
|
---|
The paper is written clearly ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
Its absence seems like a serious omission ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
It would have been nice to present a figure showing how e-prop yields eligibility traces resembling STDP, as this is one of the key connections of this work to biology ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
One part that would have been nice to clarify is the relative role of random feedback vs eligibility traces in successful network performance ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
What precisely about predictive coding makes the similarity to brain data expected ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
This model allows for more flexibility in modelling human behaviors in normal and pathological states ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
The main point relies purely on a visual representation of the top PCs of the penultimate layer of a CNN, which I believe is insufficient ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Why is for example the output temporally smoothed instead of using spatio-temporal consistency in higher dimensional networks? ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
This is not true in a beta-VAE ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Overall the technical aspects of this paper seem sound ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
Only a single (large) dataset is used, while there are many publicly available datasets that could be included for additional experiments ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The paper should also seek to connect with more of the recent work being done in spiking recurrent neural networks ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
It is not obvious how to best get around this issue, since the first embryologist screening probably has false negatives, but you need to take it into account ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
But the higher performance is not significant ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
In the algorithm what is n_{gae} ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The paper provides insufficient details regarding the RL and IL baselines, making it impossible to judge their merits ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The general organization of the paper is sound This paper tackles a problem that is relevant to the whole medical community ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
You mention complexity of data and model several times in the paper but never define what you mean by that ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
It is unclear how the model actually operates and uses attention during execution ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The presented results indicate that SRL is useful (Table 1), and that auto-encoding alone is often not enough ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
Why do IRIC and IC work worst in the medium in comparison to hard in TJ in table1 ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
What is interesting is not who is better, but how, and how well, the task can be solved ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
If you want your work applied in clinics, this is much more important than improving the results ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The paper justifies the adversarial vulnerability of the Linear SVM by arguing that the Bayes-optimal classifier is not in the Linear SVM hypothesis class, which makes sense ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
I have a minor issue with the discussion (in the last paragraph of sec. 3.2) stating that the theoretical statement of the proposed objective relies on a much weaker assumption than the nonparametric assumption made in the theoretical justification of GANs ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
I dont see how the current work adds more clarity to this research direction ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The structure of the paper is strange because it discusses attribution priors but then they are not used for the method ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
One issue, from a purely organizational standpoint, is the fact that information about previous work is either omitted or scattered around the text ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The first 10 lines contains too much wording for a statement that should be much easier to explain ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
"If you do use it, you cannot argue that you learn from ""a small number of labeled samples"" as done in the final paragraph of the paper" ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Table 3 (text classification result) does not list baselines ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The motivation needs to be a bit clearer ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Plenty of works combine autoencoders with LSTMs ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Methods, materials and validation are of a sufficient quality ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
Unfortunately the authors didn't report indications in this sense in their paper ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Figure 5 is referenced in the main text after figure 6 ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The formalization that the authors proposed is basically the definition of curriculum learning ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The results in Figure 3 are very far from the state of the art ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Section 2.3 should make the differences (if any) with Tang et al. explicit ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Writing, experimental setup and methodological proposals need to be improved and condensed ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Details of training should be more clearly written ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
It does not give the explicit relations of the sample complexity with respect to different quantities in the algorithms ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
It is necessary to prove that the generated images retain their important diagnostic value ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Does the order of concatenation influence the results ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
I am quite confused about what exactly the author are claiming is the core contribution of their work ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
There was an absence of nuance ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The figures are hard to parse because of the very short captions ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
It is necessary to run a study to confirm that in a similar way that CM images were confirmed having diagnostic value and could therefore be used instead of H&E stained images ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
No public implementation of the method is provided, which would be a nice extra ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The results are also very nice ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
To me the proposed approach does not seem particularly novel and the idea that hierarchy can be useful for multi-task learning is also not new ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The experiments are not making a convincing case that similar improvements could be obtained on a larger class of problems ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
I fail to understand the the authors augmentation ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
How do authors suggest to apply their approach to anatomies where it is impossible (in terms of feasibility and manual effort) to place a sufficiently large number of unique landmarks on the anatomy (e.g. smooth shapes, such as left ventricle in ACNN)? ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
This is a very interesting task and the dataset/models are a very useful contribution to the community ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
Section 3.3 is confusing to me ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Given its technical details it was reasonably straightforward to follow ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
The basic premise is very strange ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The experiments are not strong ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
I would like to see this curve extended until we start to see signs of overfitting ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
They show by means of extensive experiments on real as well as synthetic data that their approach is able to attain and often surpass state of the art predictive models which rely on parametric modelling of the intensity function ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
It is also not clear from the literature if these models are really working so I think these results should be presented in a more detail ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Their statement of the novelty of their method: (1) allowing each feature to have its own transformation was not clear ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The paper should have a single focus ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
How would rotating the measurement frame of the ground-truth influence the results ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Why hasn't the semi-supervised paradigm be explored in more detail instead of only using a few biasing iterations with user input? ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
You should link to this literature (mostly in NLP) and contrast your task/model with theirs ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The authors should provide support to these conclusions ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
No comparison with human data ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
I was surprised not to see how this model performs on the binarized MNIST dataset, and would like to see that result as well as CIFAR likelihood ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
In my opinion this paper is generally of good quality and clarity, modest originality and significance ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
Please elaborate on the procedure and settings of the Bayesian network used in this paper ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The paper lacks insight about a principled way to label such examples, the costs associated with such labeling, and impacts of the labeling quality on accuracy ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
These must be provided in a supplement to allow reproducability ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The technical details are presented clearly on the whole ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
I believe the concept of using predictive coding and unlabeled video data to train convnets is a great idea ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
The comparison to PCD-1 in Fig. 3 seems a bit unfair in that the learning curve ends at 8000 iterations, while PCD-1 continues to improve NLL ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
It is unclear to me what is the benefit of the proposed method ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
This sheds new light on how artificial network algorithms might be implementable by the brain ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
The most important point of critique is that the conclusion that the split representation is the best is at best premature ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The issue of model selection (clearly the main issue here) is not addressed ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
"The way table 2 is presented at the moment it seems like T-IMM is better than all methods also for ""100%""" ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Does limiting the synaptic time constants limit the intrinsic time constants, and if so by how much ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
If this does not lead to the same improvement, there should be a value in the expansion ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The main weakness of the paper is in the methods section ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The work also raises some interesting points regarding multi-task training for pathology and with further work could be a good paper ['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
Very well written ['pro', 'pro', 'pro'] paper quality
|
If the authors can reject (1), (2) and (3), they should find a plausible explaination why performance improves in their experiments ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Only real point for improvement is more earnest bench marking/model comparison ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
In the discussion you almost exclusively focus on the work by Tran et al and why comparing with that work is unfair ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The GTC metric is not very well established (yet) ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Is the work trying to address the credit assignment problem in general, or just when applied to online learning tasks ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
How many are there ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
It is not clear whether T1 and T2 is available for all cases (mostly) In Table 1, bold results are not always the best, this is very misleading ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
I believe a more measured conclusion (perhaps that we *need* more regularization methods, but even then we may not be able to get perfect robustness and accuracy) would better fit the strong results presented in the paper ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The choice de-speckle network architecture is somewhat not sound, with the multiplicative residual connection near the outputs of the network and the median filtering operation ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
The authors do not compare the inference speed of the proposed method with others ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
A comparison with Bellec et al. 2018, which looks at working memory tasks in spiking networks, would also have been appropriate ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Can we prove that at least visually ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
While it is possible that I am missing something, I have tried going through the paper a few times and the contribution is not immediately obvious ['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con'] paper quality
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.