year
int64 2.02k
2.03k
| path
stringclasses 8
values | file_name
stringlengths 16
57
| record_number
stringlengths 15
423
| nara_release_date
stringclasses 21
values | formerly_withheld
stringclasses 14
values | agency
stringclasses 30
values | document_date
stringlengths 0
19
| document_type
stringclasses 93
values | file_number
stringlengths 0
383
| to_name
stringlengths 0
47
| from_name
stringlengths 0
60
| title
stringlengths 0
246
| number_of_pages
int64 0
51.9k
⌀ | originator
stringclasses 140
values | record_series
stringclasses 301
values | review_date
stringclasses 404
values | comments
stringlengths 0
219
| pages_released
int64 1
51.9k
⌀ | content
stringlengths 31
5.75M
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32293692-1.pdf | 124-10211-10468 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 10/20/1959 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | CR SEE TITLE | DIRECTOR, FBI | SAC, NY | CR 134-8502-3 | 12 | FBI | HQ | 02/24/2018 | INC MEMO | 12 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
5/26/201
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER :
124-10211-10468
RECORD SERIES: HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : CR SEE TITLE
Document Information
ORIGINATOR:
FBI
FROM:
SAC, NY
TO:
DIRECTOR, FBI
TITLE:
[Restricted]
DATE: 10/20/1959
PAGES:
12
SUBJECTS :
DLH, ASSOC, RES, EMP, SOVIETS
DOCUMENT TYPE :
PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Secret
RESTRICTIONS: 1B; 1C; 4
CURRENT STATUS: Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 01/13/1999
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE
COMMENTS:
INC MEMO
v9.1
13
---
## Page 2
SEC
New Yor:
EX 109
Director, TBI
•Ar. rapich
034-126 0390381.
Shubatt
8654-8502) - 3
REC- 18
'12-10-59
ANNETTE SYLVIA EPSTEIN, ala.
Annette Eberly
721130
Classi
Beciassity on
3/37/85-
Reurses 10-20-59. (A(4)
Bufiles contain no information identifiable
wich coptioned 1001vi010 under the name of Annette
Eberly •(A)(U)
NrS. Jane Roman, CIA, advised on 11-4-59
that CIA
has no information concerning the subject
and that CIA has no interest in the subject.
ALL. (OFOAZATION CONTANED
naranows
4076613h
WFS : hr
(5)
3-20-96
CLASSIFIED BY/ 5668 5L2/KSR
DECLASSIFY
ON: 25X
(OFK)
Epstein being considered by NYD for development as PS1.
NY requested BU determine if CIA has info or interest as
subject, during 1956 and 1957, attended University of
strasbourgh,
(4)C
set sore alone to sa
France.
Mrs. Roman,
CIA, furnished
J. Papich 11-4-59.(8 )
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO
DECLASSIICASION AND/OR,
RELEASE OF SIF. FORMATION
IN THIS DOCUMENT. MKH 2-6-98.
DECLASSIFIED BY 5668 5C0/BC
08 3 - 10-98 (JFK.
MAILEP, 20,
NÖV 1 0 1959
COMM-FOI
| (4)
(a) i. do
Tolson
Belmont
Mohr
Nease
Parsons
Rosen
Tamm
Trotter
W.C. Sullivan _
¡Tele. Room
Holloman -
jandy -
TV SECT
---
## Page 3
STANDARD FORM NO. '64
Office Memorandum
SEC
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO
/ DIRECTOR, FBI
DATE:
10/20/59
SAC, NEW YORK
(137-4214)
280,386
Classified by
SUBJECT:
HORN FOREMAN
Annette Eberly
IS-R
RELEASE CE CIA INFORMATION
SAN THIS DOCUMENT. MKH 2-6-981
ReBuäirtel to NY.
BSI-R-DBSE0O; 19/15/592
captioned "BURTON VAN
ANNETTE SYLVIA EPSTEIN; IS-R."()(Y(U)
3-20-96
ANNETTE EBERLY, obtained from records of the City Court of
New York, Bronx County, NY, which reflect subject's name was
5668-520
Referenced airtel denied authority for the NYO
to conduct a DESECO] interview with subject.
This airtel (SU)
also directed that prior investigation concerning subject
97
10-29
S2D/KSR
DECLASSIFY ON: 25X
(Bufile 140-11741; NY f1le 140-5353) be brought up to date
and that discreet inquiries be made among subject's associates
to determine the extent and nature of her association with
Soviet nationals 7(5)
BURTON VAN HORN FORMAN, 160 Claremont Avenue,
corporation (ATC) 1016, since September 4, 1959 eu
on 9/10/59,
FOREMAN advised SAS of the FBI he had
had homosexual tendencies in the past.
directed that the PSI-R-DESECO case on FOREMAN be closed and
4/98
that no further contacts be initiated with FORMAN, but that
information FOREMAN volunteered
should
be accepted.
FOREMAN
since voluntarily furnished
information concerning American.
and Soviet employees of ATC and
concerning contacts-.and
activities of the officers of Alo
REC. 1i
Bureau (RM)
- New York (134-4214)
JCH: mkr
(3)
21019800.
VICT: 8.
324448502-3
ASSIFIER
REE-JIB Sige
AND SCORET:
3 оет 23 1959
33a6hW3e
EX: 109
ET
---
## Page 4
(NY 134-42147880(4)
On 9/17/59, FOREMAN was interviewed at his request
at his residence, 160 Claremont Avenue, NYC, bY SAS WILLIAM V.
SCHMALTZ and JOHN C. HESSIN. FOREMAN volunteered additional
information concerning the activities or are ana furnished s
the following information concerning his association with
subject:
FOREMAN stated he first met the subject in January,
1958 when both he and subject were instructing English at the
Street, NYC.
FEDORCHENKO (Buffle I05-51672; NY file 105-20553) and BORIS
"ST/VANOV: (Bufile 105-36596; NY file 105-124561 started 5
1 che bertluz school.
elated the attendance of these Soviets at the Berlitz School S
continued through June 1958. FOREMAN Stated that, about one
nonth after these soviets started the Berlitz schools thes
subject, JORIE, CARRIGUE. (Bufile 105-74489;/NY file 105-32886),
himself
accompany FEDORCHENKO and. IVANOV on coffee breaks between
classes.
FOREMAN advised GARRIGUE and DEDERI were also
instructors at the Berlitz School and that the teacher-student
coffee break relationships at the Berlitz School were a
common occurrence.
FOREMAN stated this group met for coffee at least
once every two weeks and often more frequently.
FOREMAN stated
they generally retired to thelinternational Cafeteria, RA
Building, Rockefeller Center, NYC, and that the coffee breaks
generally extended from 5 PM to 5:30 PM. FOREMAN advised
subject was first formally invited out by these Soviets]inS
prit or May 1950 when FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV requested that
subject, DEDERI and himself accompany them to lunch at the
Russian
following classes
at the Berlitz School. FOREMAN
on this occasion
they engaged in light conversation on general topics.
FOREMAN
statea to the best of his recollection, he proceeded
by subway while the soviets drove DEDERI and subject to their S
residences.
SECRET
- 2
"SEC
X-0909
---
## Page 5
(NY 134-421418814)
SEOREO
FOREMAN stated in June.
1958 he invited the subject,
GARRIGUE,
FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV]to a musicale in the residence 5)
of a Mrs. FNU LEVITSKY, 160 West 73rd Street, NYC, 9th floor.
FOREMAN stated he had previously attended several musicales
at the LEVITSKY apartment which were held
weekly on Tuesdays
during this period in LEVITSKY's apartment.
FOREMAN related
the people attending the musteales were amateur musicians
who met and played for their own pleasure. FOREMAN advised
that on no other occasion, to his knowledge, haalsoviet
nationals attended these musicales. FOREMAN stated there 3
were about 20 other people present aside Irom the subject
GARRIGUE and the mentioned Soviets, but that he was not (S
acquainted with any of the
FOREMAN advised that following the musicale, the Soviets. S
Invited the subject, GArRIGUE and himself to a steak dinner
at a restaurant located on West 73rd Street, NYC. FOREMAN
advised the conversation during the evening concerned only
general topics and was of a bantering nature to the best of
residences.
FOREMAN stated he invited FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV (S)
night in June 1958.
attend the affair but sent in his place LEONARD A KOVALEW "
(Bufile 105-64470; NY file 105=27651), a Soviet national,
employed at the UN Secretariat. FOREMAN related that DEDERI
GARRIGUE and subject attended this party as well as several
other instructors and pupils from the Berlitz School. FOREMAN
advised there were between 20 and 30 people in attendance at
FOREMAN stated one of these individuals was a
at 454 West 22nd Street,
number was chelsea 3-Y208 C, Apartment Aw, and whose telephone
FOREMAN stated HARBER became
somewhat intoxicated during the evening and started talking
about Communism In Spain, speaking apparently with authority
on the organization of communist cells in spain. FOREMAN
advised HARBER was
friendly with KOVALEV land EOREMANt
stated he had been
informed by subject that during 1958,
she (!)
-3
ISEC
Sri 104798
---
## Page 6
NY 134-4214)08u)
SECRET
had dated one
AMERICO LNU, HARBER's roommate.
FOREMANormant
nad been to the apartment shared by HARBER and hamself os
tated subject informed him that AMERICO had told her KOVALeWl
several occasions.
FOREMAN advised he could not presently
recall the other people in attendance at the party.cop
FOREMAN stated that on a Saturday night in the
latter part of July or August, 1958, the subject held a party
in ner apartment.
FOREMAN stated he believed subject had
requested KOVALEV to bring along some of his Soviet friends. (S)
FOREMAN advised KOVALEV picked him up at his residence and s
drove him to the mentioned party and that YURI I WISHUKOVS!
(BufIle 105-64471; NY fIle 105-27649) and a BORIS INU.
Soviet nationals,
FOREMAN stated, subject, GARRIGUE, DEDERI and FOREMAN's room;
JAPAN
affair in addition to the mentioned Soviets. FOREMAN advisedS
there were also in attendance about a number of people unknown
to FOREMAN who were college acquaintances of the subject.
FOREMAN stated that on 7/17/59, while visiting the
(S)
Soviet Trade
Fair, ]NYC, he and subject encountered KOVALEY
and MISHUKOV on the (Soviet Trade Fair premises.
FOREMAN (S)
FOREMAN advised (5)
a date convenient to FOREMAN.
FOREMAN stated pursuant to a call from himself to/KOVALEV onS
7/29/59, he and subject visited KOVALEV at the UNion 7/30/59• (S)
about one half hour.
FOREMAN stated on 7/14/59, he and subject attended
the Russian Festival of Music and Dance, Madison square Garder
NYC, where they encountered FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV. FOREMAN (S,
stated that after exchanging social amenities, they passed on.
SEGRET
scien o)
90-10:86
---
## Page 7
EUK
(1)
INX 134-4214780 (U)
SCONET
FOREMAN advised that on 9/11/59, the subject
informed
him she had made an appointment with FEDORCHENKO
at the UN Secretariat and requested FOREMAN accompany her.5
FOREMAN
advised the purpose of the visit was to see if the
Soviets would be Interested in a plan the subject had con-(s)
ceived to set up an English language curriculum especially
designed for the various foreign delegations to the UN. S
According to FOREMAN subject had planned to draw on former
advised that after some additional general. conversation, he
and subject departed.. FOREMAN stated there is an amicable
relationship between subject, FEDORCHENKO and himself. (5)
DEDERI and himself with the Soviets mentioned above, developed S
from the student-teacher relationship at the Berlitz School,
a curiosity on the part of the subiect, GARRIGUE, DEDERI
and himself to find out more about the Soviets and theirS
way of life and a desire to exchange Russianjand English (S)
language lessons. FOREMAN advised he had never heard sub-
ject, GARRIGUE or DEDERI utter remarks that could be construed
as sympathetic to the Communist form of government..
FOREMAN
related he was a particularly close associate of subject and
that she had confided to him that she had been troubled on
being turned down for a position with the State Department,
US Government, during 1956.
FOREMAN stated the subject felt
her rejection for the position was the result of some suspected
subversive associations of an uncle of the subject.
FOREMAN
stated subject is a sincere, loyal American and that subject
was not bitter over not being accepted by the State Department.
the cloud
which she believes
hangs over it."
JORIE GARRIGUE, previously mentioned, furnished the
NYO with considerable information concerning soviet nationals
inglish teacher to NIKOLAI M
9/4/59. GARRIGUE left ATC to attend pre-medical school au(s
the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
-5 -
SECRE
* (1)
DUP SECONS
---
## Page 8
(1)
[NY 134-42141814)
HOP SEORET
On September 3, 1959, GARRIGUE advised SA THOMAS
D.J BROOKS that she had
been acquainted with the subject and
FOREMAN since January 1958 when they all taught at the Berlitz
School of Languages,.
New York city.
GARRIGUE stated she
recalled that subject and FOREMAN had, on severa. occasions
during 1958, gone out socially with FEDORCHENKO and IVANOVS
who were then students of the English language at the Berlitz
school.
GARRIGUE stated she recalled subject had attended a
party at FOREMAN's residence, 160 Claremont Avenue, NYC, during
June or July 1958, to which FEDORCHENKO and another Soviet
national]were also invited..
GARRIGUE advised subject, FOREMAN, (5)
FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV had attended a musicale in a woman's S
apartment on West 73rd Street, NYC, during June 1958.
was unable to recall specific details of this affair.
GARRIGUE
GARRIGUE related the association of subject; FOREMAN
and herself with the mentioned soviet nationals developed ass
a result of student teacher associations at the Berlitz School
and through the above mentioned social functions. GARRIGUE
relatea subject
and English language lessons.
of no sympathy on the part of the subject of FOREMAN for
Communism and that she had no reason to question their loyalty
to the us. In this connection, it is noted GARRiGue's intro-
duction and recommendation of FOREMAN to Soviet officials at
ArC led to his employment by ATC officials as her replacement
as English Instructor at ATC. (S)
BACKGROUND
(u)
[Change of Name ]e (u)
On 10/8/59, FRANK CONCILIO, Assistant Deputy Clerk,
City Court of NY, County of the Bronx, NY, furnished SA JOHN
c.
HESSIN with City Court Petition No. 7317, year 1958, captioned
ANNETTE SYLVIA EPSTEIN.
This petition reflects that on 12/8/58,
ANNETTE SYLVIA EPSTEIN, 3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY, made
application to the special term, part 2 of the city court of
NY, Bronx county, NY, to legally assume the name, ANNETTE EBERLY.
This petition reflects that subject stated reason for desiring
the change of name was that, for the past two or three years,
subject had been known to her friends and business acquaintances
by the name ANNETTE EBERLY.
Subject's petition was
granted on
1/19/59 in the City Court of NY, Bronx County, NY.
ECRET
16- SEYET ON USH-106.21
---
## Page 9
NY 134-4214
Residence] * (u)
N SECRE
On 9/18/59, a pretext telephone call under the guise
of a credit inquiry to KIngsbridge 3-1982 listed to JULIUS
EPSTEIN, 3071 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY, by SA JOHN C. HESSIN,
determined subject currently resides
at that address.
It is
noted NY report of SA BERTRAM WORTHINGTON, 3/12/56, captioned
"ANNETTE. SYLVIA EPSTEIN, APPLICANT - FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICER,
DEPARIENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, D.CO, SECURITY OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES" sets forth interviews verifying subject's residence
The following
Interviews set forth under the caption "Employment" reflects
subject resided in France during 1950 and 1957 and at 3071
Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, N7, 1958 to date C(U)
Employment
On 10/1/59, BURTON VAN HORN FOREMAN, previously
mentioned, advised SAS SCHMALTZ and HESSIN that he had recently
typed an employment resume for subject which reflected subject
had tutored the English language to French students at the
University of Strasbourg, Strasbougg, France, during 1956 and 1957
yu)
on 10/1/59, JOSE MANOS, Assistant Director, Manhattan
Office, Berlitz School of Languages, 40 West 5lst Street, NYC,
advised the subject applied for a position as English teacher
at the Berlitz School on 1/6/50. MANOS stated subject started
employment on 1/17/5o as an English instructor and taught at
the Berlitz School until 3/4/59, except for the period June
through September, 1958, when subject was on summer leave of
absence.
MANOS stated subject listed her residence address
as 3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY. MANOS stated he was
personally acquainted with subject and that she was intelligent
and competent instructor and that he knew of nothing that
would
reflect on subject's loyalty to the US Government.
MANOS
advised subject would not be eligible for rehire because
of
a
spotty attendance record que to extensive sick leave (lu)
on 10/1/59, RITA DUNFEE, Assistant to Personne:
Director, Benton and Bowles Advertising Agency, 666 Madison
Avenue, NYC, advised SA JOHN C. HESSIN subject, as ANNETTE
EBERLY ,
was
employed as a research trainee at Benton and Bowles
from 3/9/59 through 7/17/59.
DUNE stated subject 11sted her )(ul)
7-
SECRET
---
## Page 10
did tea to a later. da
employment application.
subject's personnel file that would reflect adversely on
subject's character or loyalty to the US Government. DUNFEE
stated subject was eligible for rehire.
Miss DUNFEE advised
she did not personally recall subject and that there was no
one
presently
the
subject.
i Benton and Bowles
who would be able to recall
Director, Time and Life, InC., Rockefeller Center, NYC, advised
SA JOHN C. HESSIN that subject, as ANNETTE EBERLY, was employed
as a temporary secretary in the Market Research Section of the
Fortune Magazine division of Time and Life, Inc., on 9/14/59.
Miss WEST advised subject listed her residence as 3871 Sedgwick
Avenue, Bronx,
NY, on her employment application. Miss WEST
stated
subject's position is a 6 month temporary employment
during a period of maternity leave of another employee. Miss
WEST stated that if subject's work record was satisfactory at
the termination of the
6 month period, she would be considered
for further employment elsewhere in the organization.
Miss WEST
stated the subject had not been employed for a sufficient period
to evaluate her performance or personal characteristics.@ u
Education
on 10/1/59,
BURTON VAN HORN FOREMAN, previously.
mentioned, advised. SAS
SCHMALTZ and HESSIN that
the previously
mentioned
employment resume typed by FOREMAN for subject reflects
that during the period 1956 - 1957, subject attended the University
of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France as a student of French language
and civilization under a French Government scholarship and a
Full Bright
travel grant.
According to FOREMAN, this resume
reflected that subject attended the Strasbourg Seminar in American
Studies at the University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, during
1957 •
FOREMAN advised the resume also reflected subject
represented the US at a Seminar of 17 nations at Schloss
• Leopol-
dor, Strasbourg, France, during 1957-(p)U)
'-8 -
SECRETI
511-1.
---
## Page 11
SECKEY
Election Records ]($/U)
on 9/22/59, records of
the Board of Elections for
the borough of Bronx
County, NY, were reviewed by IC ROBERT C.
NADLER. The 1955 Signature Book reflects subject, as ANNETTE
EPSTEIN, student, registered in 1955, listing a preference for
one of the two major political parties (R)(u)
on 9/22/59,
the records of the Credit Bureau of
Greater New York were furnished by PAULINE DE FIORE to IC
ALFRED G. ENNULAT.
These records contained ne derogatory
Information concerning subject or mabers of her family. (i(N)
Criminal 71444)
on 9/25/59,
SA VINCENT F. CLANCY caused the records
of the BSS and BCI of the NYCPD to
be checked for subject and
members of her family.
These records contained no information
identiflable with subject or members of her fartly. CoU)
Informants
The following confidential informants who are
acquainted with the activities of the CP in the NYC area,
were contacted by the following agents on the dates set forth
below:
These informants were unable to furnish any infor-
mation identifiable with subject or members of her family:
Informant
NY 1086-S
NY 2009-S
NY 646-S
NY 779+5
NY
388-S
NY 2124+S
NY
384-5*
NY 972-S
NY 367-S
Date Contacted
Agent Contacting
9/28/59
DAVID RYAN
9/28/59
DAVID RYAN
9/24/59
JOHN A. HAAG
9/24/59
JOHN A. HAAG
9/22/59
LEROY W. SHEETS
9/24/59
LEROY W. SHEETS
9/22/59
JAMES P. HALLERON
9/23/59
JAMES
HALLERON
9/23/59
JAMES
P.
HALLERON
- 9 -
Jli-10N:8
---
## Page 12
ÍSEC
NSA
REVIEWED BY JURK TASR FORCE.
OM
4/24/97 cat
* RELEASE IN PART
TOTAL DENIAL
NX 134-4214 CX4)
Miscellaneous
REY
Prior investigation of subject was
conducted by NYO
from 2/56 through 5/56 in the case captioned
"ANNETTE SYLVIA
ESPTEIN; APPLICANT - FOREEGN SERVICE OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF
STATE, WASHINGTON,
D.C. - SECURITY OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES."
Agent, NYC, sent information to Moscow on 5/26/43, mentioning
the address
3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY..
Following the
address were some missing parts, then came the digits...982.
An additional gap in the message was followed by the statement
that
someone's sentiments were pro-Soviet.
Thereafter,
considerable portion of the message was missing and then
the name LEBEDEV was mentioned. In 1943, the EPSTEIN family (S)
residence was 3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY, and the EPSTEIN
family telephone number was KIngsbridge 3-1982. It is noted
subject was nine years of age in 1943. R
The significance of the above information was not
known, but, in addition,
to forming the basis of the mentioned
NEW YORK (SOME) ESP-R"
JULIUS EPSTEIN and TATIANA EPSTEIN, subject's parents, LSJ
a corollary case was investigated, captioned "NELSON CHIPCHIN, 7
OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES"!
(ure 123 53 10 16 440-306 PO A GONERAME ENTORES
Considerable investigation was conducted in the
unsub case subsequent to termination, in 5/56, of the NYO SGE
case of subject. (fl
NY letter to Director, 8/23/56, in the unsub case,
reflects that during the course of an interview with TATIANA
EPSTEIN, the subject's mother, by SAS of the FBI, TATIANA EPSTEIN
advised that subject had received a letter from the Department
of state, Washington, D.Cs, stating that the Department of state &
- 10 -
ETI
---
## Page 13
(m) BECK
Ny 134-4224J81(4)
could not use the subject's services but that their failure
to hire her was noc to be considered
reflection on subject's
character, reputation or abilities.
4)
SEGRET
for the unknown subject in this case.
This report also set
forth information in explanation and mitigation of the original
information furnished by source 5. In this connection, It Is
noted that subject advised BURTON VAN HORN FOREMAN, previously
mentioned, in 9/59, that CHIPCHIN was currently
employed by
(5)
the Department of State at Radio Center, Munich, Germany.
In view of subject's established acquaintanceship
also appears subject would be receptive to an invitation to
cooperate with the Bureau concerning her continuing association
with Soviet nationals in view of her purported remarks to
BURTON: VAN HORN FOREMAN, previously mentioned, to the effect
that
subject had in the past, possessed a desire to "ölear her
name" in regard to suspected subversive activities of an uncle.
In this connection, Bureau authority will be requested
to interview subject to assess her
attitude, availability and
potential as a PSIor double agent upon completion of background S
checks currently being conducted by the Newark Office and com-
pletion of the following request of the Bureau.
The Bureau is requested to determine, through liaison,
whether CIA has an interest in subject or information concerning
the subject, noting subject reportedly attended the University
of Strasbourg,
Strasbourg,
France, during 1956 and 1957. Subjec
was born 3/12/34; Bronx, NY•C
The Bureau is requested to search Bureau indices for
mention of subject under her legally assumed name, ANNETTE EBERLY.
- 11
-
(Nu)
•GE
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32627026.pdf | No RIF - 250 pp. Report to PFIAB/Cuban arms | 04/26/2018 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | null | null | ## Page 1
JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY : NARA
RECORD NUMBER : None-listed
RECORD SERIES :
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
ORIGINATOR :
FROM :
TO
TITLE : Report to PFIAB/Cuban Arms
DATE : 10/14/1962
PAGES :
SUBJECTS :
DOCUMENT TYPE :
CLASSIFICATION :
RESTRICTIONS :
CURRENT STATUS :
DATE OF LAST REVIEW :
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS :
DocId: 32627026
Page 1
---
## Page 2
VOLUME I
ANNEXES TO REPORT TO THE
PRESIDENT'S FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY BOARD
ON
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
RELATING TO THE CUBAN ARMS BUILD-UP
(14 April through 14 October 1962)
DocId: 32627026
Page 2
---
## Page 3
SECRET
C RR 2 60251
270
INTERROGATION GUIDE: CUBA
DECLASSIFIED
EO: 13526, SEC 35
NLK-10-119 SCAP Asa
BY MAD. NARA; Date 12
-SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 3
---
## Page 4
WARNING
This material
contains information affecting
the National Defense of the United States
within the meaning of the espionage laws,
Title 18, \USC,
Secs. 793 and 794, the trans-
mission or revelation of which in any manner
to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law.
DocId: 32627026
Page 4
---
## Page 5
SECRET
: A
N
ANNEX A
INTERROGATION GUIDE: CUBA
This annex consists of the Interrogation Guide: Cuba which
was primarily designed for debriefing Cuban escapees/ refugees and
for advance briefing
and debriefing of visitors (including agents) to
Cuba. It also provided a systematic statement of information needs
to be used as the basis for collection planning,
collection action, and
responsive reporting. This guide was originally prepared by CIA in
February 1962 for use by the Caribbean Admissions. Center, Opa-Locka.
It was revised in March with full community participation. A major
revision of the guide took place in May with full USIB coordination..
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
5
---
## Page 6
Nombre
y apellidos:
Condiciones y Costos de Vida
Edad:
Residencia: (indique provincia, y ciudad si corresponde):
2/62
Sexo:
Fecha en que partió de Cuba:
I. En Cuba, se consideraba Ud. residente de pueblo o del campo?
2. ¿A qué se dedicaba en Cuba?
3.
¿ Cuánto le reportaba en dinero semanal o mensualmente este oficio
inmediamente antes de partir de Cuba?
4.
5.
6.
¿ Ganaba más o ganaba menos en dicho empleo antes de la revolución?
¿ Cuánto mas?
¿Cuánto menos?
¿Además del salario en dinero, ¿recibía también comida, ropa, atencion
medica o vivienda suministradas por el gobierno? En tal caso, explique
brevemente.
7.
¿Qué medio de transporte usaba para viajar al trabajo?
¿Tuvo dificultad con el transporte últimamente?
8.
¿Cuántas horas por semana se suponía que trabajara?
¿Cuántas horas por semana trabajaba en realidad?
¿Cuántos días por
semana trabajaba?
Después del trabajo ¿tenía que servir en las milicias o en otra forma?
Ixplique brevemente.
10.
¿Tenía Ud. o su familia vivienda tan espaciosa bajo el régimen de
Castro como antes?
(Conteste sí o no)
Si no, ¿ tenía más o
tenía menos espacio?
DocId: 32627026 Page 6
---
## Page 7
DocId: 32627026
Page
2/62
11. Artículos de consumo: Precios y Disponibilidad
Anote 10 mejor que pueda los siguientes datos sobre precios y disponibilidad de artículos de consumo.
Unidad de Peso, Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad
Medida o Cantidad
en
(al momento de Mercado libre
1958
partir)
escasez 0
abundancia)
de partir)
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origen
ALIMENTOS
(Especifique el precio
de los artículos ali-
menticios en términos
de cantidad, peso o
/ medida.)
Arroz
Frijoles negros
Frijoles coloradas
Garbanzos
Chícharos
Malanga
Gallina
Garne de res
Garne de puerco
Tocino
Jamón
Embutidos
Mantequilla
Manteca
---
## Page 8
DocId: 32627026
Page
2/62
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad
en
1958
(al momento de
Mercado libre
(escasez o
partir)
(al momento
abundancia)
de partir)
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origen
ALIMENTOS
(Especifique el precio
de los artículos ali-
menticios en términos
de cantidad, peso o
medida.)
Aceite de aliva
Aceite de maní
Aceite de soya
Queso
Pescado fresco (diga que clase)
Café
Azúcar
Leche fresca
Leche enlatada
Alimentos enlatados (indique clase)
Cebolla
AJO
Tomates
Naranjas dulces
PIñe
Otras hortalizas ( indique clase )
---
## Page 9
DocId: 32627026
Page
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
Precio Precio Oficial
en
(al momento de
1958
partir)
Precio en el Disponibilidad
Mercado libre
(escasez o
(al momento
abundancia)
de partir)
2/62
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origen
ALIMENTOS
(Especifique el precio
de los artículos ali-
menticios en términos
de cantidad, peso o
medida.)
Pimienta
Sal
ROPA
De hombre:
Ropa de trabajo
Pantalones
1 par
Camisa
Zapatos
Calcetines
1 par
1 par
Camiseta
Calzoncillos
1 par
De vestir
Flus (precio medio) 1
Zapatos (precio medio ) 1 par
---
## Page 10
DocId: 32627026
Page
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
Precio Precio Oficial
en
1958
(al momento de
partir)
Precio en el Disponibilidad
Mercado libre
(escasez o
(al momento
abundancia)
de partir)
2/62
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origen
ROPA
De señora:
Ropa de casa
Ropa de salir (precio medio) 1
Pañuelo para la cabeza
Enagua o refajo
Medias de nylon
Media de rayón
Medias de algodón
Zapatos corrientes
Zapatos de vestir
De niño:
Escolar para varones
Pantalones
Camisa
Zapatos
1 par
1 par
1 par
1 par
1 par
T°
---
## Page 11
DocId: 32627026
Page
11
2/62
Unidad de Peso, Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad Observaciones
Medida o Cantidad
en
1958
•(al momento de Mercado libre
partir)
(al momento
(escasez o
abundancia)
sobre calidad
y país de origen
de partir)
ROPA
Escolar para niñas
Vestido
Blusa
Falda
Zapatos
1 par
otros artículos:
Frazada
Sábana
Toalla de baño
ARTICULOS NO DE CONSUMO
( Diga si puede la marca,
el estilo y otras características. )
Televisor
Radio
Plancha eléctrica
Refrigerador
Cocina eléctrica
---
## Page 12
DocId: 32627026
Page
12
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
ARTICULOS NO DE CONSUMO
Cocina de gas
Sartén de hierro
Sartén de aluminio
Bicicleta
ARTICULOS DIVERSOS
Fósforos ( clase y cantidad )
Cigarros ( clase y cantidad .)
Tabacos ( clase y cantidad )
Gas embotellado (cantidad )
Kerosén (cantidad )
Gasolina (cantidad )
Aceite de motor ( cantidad)
Jabón (clase y cantidad)
Precio
en
1958
2/62
Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad
Observaciones
(al momento de
partir)
Mercado libre (escasez o
(al momento .
sobre calidad
abundancia)
y país de origéti
de partir
---
## Page 13
DocId
32627026
Page
Datos sobre los Programas de Radio
2/62
El siguiente cuestionario esta siendo distribuido a todos los pasajeros que desembarcan desde Cuba. El proposito
del mismo es el de recopilar datos sobre los programas de radio, transmitidos desde el extranjero, que se estan oyendo
en Cuba. No encierra compromiso alguno para Ud. ya que no es necesario que Ud. firme nada, ni ponga su nombre en
ninguna parte. Simplemente solicitamos su cooperacion rogandole llene el cuestionario siguiente y lo eche al correo,
en el sobre que adjuntamos, favor que se le agradecera sinceramente.
1. ¿Cuando Ud. estaba en Cuba, acostumbraba oir programas de radio desde el extranjero? Si
NO
No recuerdo, o no se
2. Diganos, por favor, los programas y emisoras que Ud. oia con preferencia, en que idioma los oia, a que hora,
y si la
recepcion era buena, regular o mala.
Programa
Emisora
Idioma
Hora
Buena
Recepcion
Mala
Regular
Comentarios
3. ¿ En que termino municipal vivia Ua.?
4. ¿Tenia radio de onda larga sola
Provincia
5.
Onda corta y larga
¿Que tipo de programa desde el extranjero, cree Ud. que seria de mayor utilidad en Cuba en los momentos actuales?
6.
Haga a continuacion cualquier comentario que Ud. quiera hacer sobre los programas de radio dirigidos
el extranjero.
a Cuba desde
7.
Comentario en general:
---
## Page 14
Nombre y apellidos:
Condiciones y Costos de Vida
Edad:
Residencia: (indique provincia, y ciudad si corresponde):
2/62
Sexo:
Fecha en que partió de Cuba:
1. En Cuba, se consideraba Ua. residente de pueblo o del campo?
2. ¿A qué se dedicaba en Cuba?
3.
¿ Cuánto le reportaba en dinero semanal o mensualmente este oficio
inmediamente antes de partir de Cuba?
4.
¿ Ganaba más o ganaba menos en dicho empleo antes de la revolución?
5.
¿ Cuánto más?
¿Cuanto menos?
¿Además del salario en dinero, ¿recibía también comida, ropa, atencion
medica o vivienda suministradas por el gobierno? En tal caso, explique
brevemente.
7.
¿Qué medio de transporte usaba para viajar al trabajo?
¿Tuvo dificultad con el transporte últimamente?
8.
¿Cuántas horas
por semana se suponía que trabajara?
¿Cuántas horas por semana trabajaba en realidad?
¿Cuántos días por semana trabajaba?
Despues del trabajo
¿tenía que servir en las milicias o en otra forma?
Explique brevemente.
10.
¿Tenía la, o su familia vivienda tan espaciosa bajo el régimen de
Castro como antes? (Conteste sí o no)
Si no, ¿ tenía más o
tenía menos espacio?
DocId: 32627026
Page
14
---
## Page 15
DocId: 32627026
Page
2/62
11. Artículos de consumo:
Precios y Disponibilidad
Anote 10 mejor que pueda los siguientes datos sobre precios y disponibilidad de artículos de consumo.
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
Precio Precio Oficial
Precio en el
(al momento de Mercado libre
1958
partir)
(al momento
de partir)
Disponibilidad
escasez o
abundancia)
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origen
ALIMENTOS
(Especifique el precio
de los artículos ali-
menticios en términos
de cantidad, peso o
medida.)
Arroz
Frijoles negros
Frijoles coloradas
Garbanzos
Chícharos
Malanga
Gallina
Garne de res
Garne de puerco
Tocino
Jamón
Embutidos
Mantequilla
Manteca
---
## Page 16
DocId: 32627026
Pag
16
2/62.
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
Precio Precio Oficial
• Precio en el Disponibilidad
(al momento de
Mercado libre
(escasez 0
1958
partir)
(al momento
abundancia)
de partir)
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origen
ALIMENTOS
(Especifique el precio
de los artículos ali-
menticios en términos
de cantidad, peso o
medida.)
Aceite de aliva
Aceite de maní
Aceite de soya
Queso
Pescado fresco (diga que clase)
Café
Azúcar
Leche fresca
Leche enlatada
Alimentos enlatados (indique clase)
Cebolla
Ajo
Tomates
Naranjas dulces
Piña
Otras hortalizas (indique clase )
---
## Page 17
DocId: 32627026
Page 17
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
ALIMENTOS
Especifique el precio
de los artículos ali-
menticios en términos
de cantidad, peso o
medida.)
Pimienta
Sal
ROPA
De hombre:
Ropa de trabajo
Pantalones
Camisa
Zapatos
Calcetines
Camiseta
Calzoncillos
1 par
1 par
1 par
1 par
De vestir
Flus ( precio medio ) 1
Zapatos ( precio medio ) 1 par
Precio Precio Oficial
en
1958
(al momento de
partir)
Precio en el Disponibilidad
Mercado libre
(escasez o
(al momento
abundancia)
de partir)
2/62
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origen
₴
---
## Page 18
DocId: 32627026
Page.
18
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
Precio Precio Oficial
en
1958
(al momento de
partir)
Precio en el Disponibilidad
Mercado libre
(escasez o
(al momento
abundancia)
de partir)
2/62
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origen
ROPA
De señora:
Ropa de casa
Ropa de salir (precio medio) 1
Pañuelo para la cabeza
Enagua o refajo
Medias de nylon
Media de rayón
Medias de algodón
Zapatos corrientes
Zapatos de vestir
• De niño:
Escolar para varones
Pantalones
Camisa
Zapatos
^24
1 par
1 par
1 par
1 par
1 par
1 par
---
## Page 19
DocId: 32627026
Page
2/62
Unidad de Peso,
Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad Observaciones
Medida o Cantidad
en
(al momento de Mercado libre
(escasez o
1958
partir)
(al momento
abundancia)
sobre calidad
y país de origen
de partir)
ROPA
Escolar para niñas
Vestido
Blusa
Falda
Zapatos
1 par
Otros artículos:
Frazada
Sábana
Toalla de baño 1
ARTICULOS NO DE CONSUMO
( Diga si puede la marca,
el estilo y otras características. )
Televisor
Radio
Plancha eléctrica
Refrigerador
Cocina eléctrica
---
## Page 20
DocId: 32627026
Page
20
Unidad de Peso,
Medida o Cantidad
Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad
(al momento de Mercado libre (escasez o
1958
partir)
(al momento
abundancia)
de partir
2/62-
Observaciones
sobre calidad
y país de origel
ARTICULOS NO DE CONSUMO
Cocina de gas
Sartén de hierro
Sartén de aluminio
Bicicleta
ARTICULOS DIVERSOS
Fósforos (clase y cantidad )
Cigarros ( clase y cantidad )
Tabacos ( clase y cantidad )
Gas embotellado (cantidad )
Kerosén ( cantidad )
Gasolina ( cantidad )
Aceite de motor (cantidad)
Jabón (clase y cantidad)
$. 85-6
---
## Page 21
DocId:
326
27026
Pade
21
Datos sobre los Programas de Radio
2/62
El siguiente cuestionario esta siendo distribuido a todos los pasajeros que desembarcan desde Cuba. El proposito
del mismo es el de recopilar datos sobre los programas de radio, transmitidos desde el extranjero, que se estan oyendo
en Cuba. No encierra compromiso alguno para Ud. ya que no es necesario que Ud. firme nada, ni ponga su nombre en
ninguna parte. Simplemente solicitamos su cooperacion rogandole llene el cuestionario siguiente y lo eche al correo,
en el sobre que adjuntamos, favor que se le agradecera sinceramente:
1. ¿Cuando Ud. estaba en Cuba, acostumbraba oir programas de radio desde el extranjero? Si
No recuerdo, o no se
2. Diganos, por favor, los programas y emisoras que Ud. oia con preferencia, en que idioma los oia, a que hora,
y si la recepcion era buena, regular o mala.
Programa
Emisora
Idioma
Hora
Recepcion
Buena
Mala
Regular
Comentarios
3. ¿ En que termino municipal vivia Ud.?
4. ¿Tenia radio de onda larga sola
Provincia
5.
Onda corta y larga
¿Que tipo de programa desde el extranjero, cree Ua. que seria de mayor utilidad en Cuba en los momentos actuales?
6.
7.
Haga a continuacion cualquier comentario que Ua. quiera hacer sobre los programas de radio dirigidos a Cuba desde
el extranjero.
Comentario en general:
---
## Page 22
EXEMPTED NUI. 10. 119 4/11
SECRET
sanitized NLK-10-19 ISCAP Appeal, 19/18
5/62
MEMORANDUM FOR: Recipients of Interrogation Guide: Cuba (C-RR2 60251)
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Chief, Intelligence Information Staff, ORR
Revision of C-RR2 60251
1. When the Interrogation Guide: Cuba (C-RR2 60251) was
published, recipients were advised that it would be updated
periodically. Attached are current changes with revision
date 5/62 (May 1962) marked in upper right hand corner of
each change page.
2. The Watch List, pages iii and iv, is to be deleted
and the new List inserted in its place.
3. The following changes are to be made as indicated:
Delete
Insert
Page No. (s.)
Section
Page No. (s)
6
1000
6
Section
1000
18
1000
18-18a
27
2000
27-270
1000
1000
28
2000
28:..
2000
31
2000
31-31a
2000
32
2000
44
3000
32-32m
44
2000
3000
47
3000
47
3000
55
3000
55-55a
3000
62
3000
62
3000
64
3000
64
3000
65
3000
65-65a
3000
66
3000
66-66a
3000
SE
CRE T
DocId: 32627026
Page 22
---
## Page 23
SECRET
5/62
Delete
Page No. (s)
82
115
sectior
4000
5000
Insert
Page No. (s)
82
115
Section
4000
5000
4. The page listing the Annexes (Section 8000) is to be
deleted and the new page listing Annex C inserted.
Pages C-1
through C-13 are to be inserted after Annex B:
5. The airfield map in the front of the Guide includes.
only selected air facilities. Changes should be made on the
map to indicate the recently constructed Santa Clara International
airfield.
The present dimensions are estimated to be 10,400
feet long; the; saving is reportedly nearing completion.
For the Chief,
Intelligence Information Staff
Edgar a Bradley
EDGAR
BRADLEY
Chief, Requirements Branch
Office of Research and Reports
- 2
S
E
CRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 23
---
## Page 24
SECR
ET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWARD-
WATCH LIST-
1000
POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL
Political Dynamics-.
Political Policies
and Objectives-----
Structure and Operation of Government-
Communist Party Control=
Organization--
Political leaders=--
Prisions--------
Judiciary-
Intelligence and Security Organizations
Organization--
Personnel---
Training-
Operational Activities-
Soviet Intelligence Services
in
Cuba--
Sociological
Population
Population Movements-
Attitudes--
Ethnic Differences--=--
Reception of Foreigners-
Social Structure-
Religion--
Education-
University-
Secondary Schools-
Primary Schools--
Adult Education--
Trade Schools-
News Media-.•
Psychological--
2000
MILITARY
General--
Guided Missiles--
Installations and Equipment-
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 24
5/62
Question
Number
-Page
Number
1001-1006
1007-1009
1010-1021
1022-1031
1032-1037
1038-1043
1044-1050
1051-1069
1070-1079
1080-1086
1087-1090
1099-1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119-1126
1127-1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138-1141
1142-1146
iii
1
2
6
7
10
11
• 11
14
16
16
16
17
17
17
18
19
20
20
20
21
21
21
2001-2035
2036-20399
2040-2046
23.
27
27c
---
## Page 25
SECRET
2000
3000
MILITARY (Continued)
Shipments of Bloc Arms-
Planning-------
Security Organizations and Functions-
General Questions on Cuban Navy---
Fishing Fleet---
Maritime Activities-----
Cryptologic Information ana Material-
Communications Cryptologic Activities-
Cryptologic Equipment-
Radio Agents----
Intercept and Crypt Analysis (COMINT)
Activities-----
Communications Countermeasures Signals-
Electronic Information and Material----
Non-Communicative Signals-
Cuban Air Force General--
Air Order of Battle and State of
Readiness-.
Personnel------
EW/GCI Radar Order of Battle-
AAA Order of Battle-
Organizational Training-
Training----
Key Air Force Personnel and Biographic
Information--
Logistics--
Means of Identification-
Electronics---
Ammunition Storage--
Highway Construction-
Air Facilities-
Medical Facilities-
Hospitals----
ECONOMIC
Economic Planning and Programs
National Planning
Economic Growth--
Economic Control Structure-
Domestic Finance-
Foreign Trade-
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 25
5/62
Question
Number
Page.
Number
2047-2049
2050-2052
2053-2057
2058-2080
20801-20802
20803-20805
2081
2082-2083
2084
2085-2087
2088-2089
2090
2091-2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108-2124
28
28
29
29
31
31a
32
32
32
32b
32b
32b
32c
32d
32e
32€
32e
32f
32f
32f
32F
32g
32g
328
32g
32h
32h
32h
32i
321
3001-3002
3003-3006
3007-3008
3009-3011
33
33
34
35
---
## Page 26
SECRET
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Prices-
Commodities----
U.S. Trade Embargo-
International Finance-
Convertible Currencies-
Nonconvertible Currency-
Arms Payments----
Multilateral Payments Agreement--.
Miscellaneous--
Bloc Economic Aid--
Industrilization-
Specific Projects-
Soviet Bloc Technical Assistance~
Industry--
General--------
Industrial Sectors of Interest-.
Manufacturing Industries-
Information Needed---
Specific Information Needs on Key Indus-
tries--.
Mining Industries--
Manufacturing Industries-
Service Industries-.
Transportation--
National Level--
Harbor Facilities
Port Security---
Merchant Shipping-
Civil Air-
Local Level
Automobile-
Railroad-
Trucking
Busses--
Taxi Service--
Electric Power-
Organization and Administration---
Labor Force-
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 26
5/62
Question
Number
Page
Number
3012-3014
3015-3026
3027-3029
3030-3034
3035
3036-3039
3040
3041-3045
3046-3049
3050
3051-3059
3060-3067
3068
3069
3070-3093
3094
3095-3098
3099
3100-3110
3111-3119
3120-3125
3126-3129
3130-31327
3133
3134
3135
3136
: 3137
3138-3140
3141
40
40
41
41
42
43
43
43
44
45
46
46
47
47
48
51
51
51
52
52
52
53
54
54
55a
55a
55a
56
57
57
58
58
59
---
## Page 27
SECRET
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Production--.
Powerplants--
Transmission-
Consumption--
Aid-----
Problems---
Costs---
National Level
Local Level--
Telephone System-
National Level-
Local Level--
Telegraph System-
Radio and Television
National Level--
Local Level---
Agriculture---
Agricultural Organization and
Policies----
Agricultural Production--
Agricultural Input Factors--
Procurement and Distribution of
Agricultural Products-
Miscellaneous--
-= -
Outline of Key Topics for assessment
of labor force-
Questions for the development of
information--
Organized Labor
Worker morale-
Consumer Welfare---
General Direction of Living
Standards---
Availability and Quality of Goods---
Availability and Quality of Housing-
Availability and Quality of Other
Services---
Emphasis in Distribution of Goods
and Services--
Regime Vulnerabilities in Consumer
Welfarea
Extent of censorship in Cube-
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 27
5/62
Question
Number
Page
Number
3142-3146
3147-3153
3154-3156
3157-3158
3159-3162
3163-3165
3166-3169
3170-3179
3180-3184
3185-3190
3-91-3201
3202
3203-32076
3208-3214
3215-3217
3218-3263
3264-3274
3275-3279
3280-3281
3282-3289
3290-3301
3302-3315
3316-3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
72
72
73
74
76
77
79
79
79
79
79
80
80
•80
---
## Page 28
SECRET
3000
4000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Procedures for persons to follow in
order to leave Cuba-
Asylum---
GEOGRAPHIC
Physical Setting--
Relief and Drainage-
Water Supply-
Vegetation---
Wildlife--
Climate-
Travel---
Rail-passenger-
Rail-freight-
Inter-urban Bus-
Inter-urban Bicycle,
horse, burro,
Foot--.
Water--
Air-----
Urban Public Transportation-•
Automobile---
Travel Controls--
Special Regulations-
Clandestine Movement-
Sensitive Installations
General----
Authorization to enter restricted
areas -
Movement within restricted areas---
Authorization to live in restricted
areas -
Authorization to leave a restricted
area-----
Local Business Conditions-
General-
Business Controls-------
Foreign Business Community--
Housing--
Eating and Buying Food----
Social Activities-.
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 28
5/62
Question
Number
Page
Number
3329
3330
80
81
4001-4003
4004-4007
4008-4012
4013-4016
4017-4019
4020-4023
4024-4030
4031-4035
4041-4044
4045-4054
4055-4058
4059-4066
4067-4071
4072-4082
4083-4090
4091-4092
4093-4102
4103-4109
4110-4115
4116-4121
4122-4133
4134-4140
4141-4143
4144-4148
4149-4150
4151-4171
82
82
82
83
84
84
85
85
87
89
89
90
91
92
93
93
94
95
95
95
96
97
97
98
98
99:
99
99
102
104
---
## Page 29
SECRET
4000
GEOGRAPHIC (Continued)
5000
6000
Employment----
Postal Communications--
Medical and Dental--
Miscellaneous Personal Activities--
Documentation--.
FACTORY MARKINGS
Exploitation opportunities-
Interrogation opportunities--
DEBRIEFING AIDS
Map of Cuba-----
Factory Markings Handbook--
Consumer Welfare Questionnaire-
Radio Broadcast Questionnaire--
Grid Sketch Map--
7000 ILLUSTRATIONS
8000 ANNEXES
Annex A--
Annex B-
Annex C--
DocId: 32627026
Page 29
5/62
Question
Number
Page
Number
4172-4178
4179-4194
4195-4201
4202-4220
4221-4231
107
108
110
111
112
5001
5002
115
115
6001
6002
6003
6004
6005
116
116
116
116
116.
A-1
B-1
C-1
---
## Page 30
SECRET
5/62
WATCH LIST
(5/62)
This Watch List contains selected occupations, organizations and
geographic area in which there is a continuing and high priority
interest.
This List will be revised in light of responsive reporting and
changing information needs. Headquarters should be notified promptly
when sources knowledgeable on Watch List items become available so
that detailed requirements can be provided for exploitation in depth.
I. Military Officers;
2. Industrial plant managers and foremen;
3. Technicians including communications specialists;
4. Harbor pilots and port captains;
5. Employees from:
ORI (Integrated Revolutionary Organization)
JUCEPLAN (Central Committee for Planning)
under which also: Direccion de
Estadisticas Directorate of Statistics)
CTC-R (Revolutionary Cuban Workers' Central)
JUCEI (Councils for Coordination, Executive
and Inspection)
INRA - Instituto Nacional de Reforma
Agraria (National Institute for Agrarian
Reform) under which also:
ANGP - Administration Nacional de Granjas
del Pueblo (National Administration of
People's Farms)
AGCC - Administracion General de las Coopera-
tivas Caneras (General Administration of
Cane Cooperatives
ANAP - Asociacion Nacional de Agricultores
Pequenos (National Association of Small
Farmers)
Ministerio de Economia
(Ministry of the Economy)
Ministerio de Comercio del
Exterior (Ministry of
Foreign Trade)
Ministerio de Comercio del
- Interior (Ministry of
Internal Trade)
Ministerio de Comunicaciones
(Ministry of Communications)
Red Oficial de Comunicaciones
por Microondus (ROCMI.)
Ministerio de Industrias
(Ministry of Industry) under
which also:
ICP - Instituto Cubano
de Petroleo (Cuban Petroleum
Institute)
ICM - Instituto Cubano
de Mineria (Cuban Mineral
Institute)
iii
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 30
---
## Page 31
SECRET
5/62
WATCH LIST (Continued)
Empresa Consolidada de la Goma
(Consolidated Enterprise for Rubber)
Empresa Consolidada de Minas
(Consolidated Enterprise for
Mining)
Empresa Consolidada de la
Electricidad (Consolidated Enter-
prise for Electric Power)
Ministerio de Transporte
(Ministry of Iransport) under
which also:
Impresa Consolidada de
Navigacion (Consolidated
Enterprise for Merchant
Shipping)
Empresa Consolidada de Cubana
de Aviacion (Consolidated
Enterprise for Civil Aviation -
Cubana)
Moa Bay and Nicaro Nickel Plants
Banco Nacional (National Bank)
6. Former residents from:
General area of Pinar del Rio and Vinales.
General area of Cienfuegos and Trinidad.
iv.
DocId: 32627026
Page 31
---
## Page 32
SECRET
5/62
1000 POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL (Continued)
Political Leaders (Continued)
1037 Does source know any officials of the Communist Party;
local government?
What is his evaluation of them?
What influences
do their wives or close relatives have upon them?
Prisons
1038
Where are prisons located?
1039 Is there any separation in the prisons between criminals
or political prisoners?
1040
What is the political supervision of the guards and
prison officials?
Whom, among the guards or officials would be
susceptible to bribery?
prisoners?
1041 What are visiting hours
and regulations for political
For criminals?
1042
Who are the outstanding prisoners that source knows of?
1043
Whom does source suspect to be innocent political
prisoners?
Judiciary
1044
What does source know of the civil judiciary?
1045
Who are the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys?
1046
Whom are they seen with professionally and whom are they
seen with privately?
1047 How susceptible is this group to bribery?
What are
the controls over them?
1048 Can source name any judges he thinks are untainted by
the Communist touch? Any attorneys?
1049 Is there any indication that the judiciary disagrees
with the regime?
1050 To what extent is the civil judiciary influenced in civil
and criminal cases by the Communist bosses?
- 6 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 32
---
## Page 33
SECRET
5/62
1000 POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL (Continued)
Sociological (Continued)
Religion (Continued)
1126
Do the religious of the main city
have contact with
religious in other areas of the island?
Education
112? Report information about policies and activities of the
Castro regime regarding the educational system and how it is affected
by the regime. Report on the following:
a. Any details concerning the literacy program
regarding instruction, instructors, time and place of meetings;
b. To what extent is there any real change in literacy?
c. Has Castro's educational program done more than
teach people to write their names?
¿. How many Cubans have been forced to participate
in the literacy program?
e. How many volunteered to take the literacy courses?
f. Is it a continuing program?
g. Were all Cubans participating in the literacy courses
indoctrinated in Communist ideology?
If so was the indoctrination
Soviet slanted or Chinese?
1128
Does source know of any new scientific or technical.colleges
or universities that have been or are being set up?
What are their
specialities?
Describe; give date of observation and locations.
1129
Who are the major school administrators and teachers?
Give a complete
estimate of
each
as to:
a.
Intellect
b.
Political leanings - pro or anti-Castro
c. Influence on students
- 18 -
SECRET
'DocId: 32627026
Page 33
---
## Page 34
SECRET
5/62
1000
POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL. (Continued)
Education (Continued)
d. Associations and persons who control each
e. Outside activities
1130
Where do the school administrators and teachers live?
To whom are they related?
1131
How is Communist policy interjected into the educational
system?
1132
What students have been sent to the Sino-soviet Bloc
countries for technical training?
-
18a
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
34
---
## Page 35
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
General (Continued)
2035 Transportation and communication facilities serving
military areas: any new construction? Type and status. (See also
Section 3000, paras 3099-3137).
Guided Missiles
2036 There have been many rumors and low grade reports of
missile activity in Cuba.
In view of present and potential conditions
in Cuba, there is a continuing requirement for information or indica-
tions of plans to procure missiles or of military assistance agreements
between the Soviet Bloc and Cuba for supplying short range, intermediate
range or air-to-surface missiles.
2037
Does source know of any new or unusual laboratories,
plants, or restricted field sites, such as missile test or launch
facilities? If under construction, how far has work gone?
Describe:
give date, locations, quantities, and originating country.
2038
Any construction of missile sites, evidence of mobile
missile launchers, evidence of ships or boats equipped for missile
launching, or characteristics and combat readiness of missiles would
be of priority interest.
2039
Any training of Cuban military forces in handling
missiles? Any information on presence of Bloc missile experts.
20391
Improvements or additions to the transportation facil-
¡ties, particularly in remote areas.
a. Repairs to rail bed to provide more shockfree ride.
Reinforcing or replacing of existing rail or
highway bridges.
c. Construction of new rail lines or spurs.
d. Paving, widening, and elimination of sharp curves
on existing highways.
e. Construction of new highways.
f. Addition of new railroad stations.
- 27-
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 35
---
## Page 36
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Guided Missiles (Continued)
20392
cargoes.
20393
20394
g. Elimination of stops on rail routes.
h. Extension of cargo plane and helicopter service
into new areas.
i. Additions or elimination of stops on inland
waterways.
Reports of special types of transportation equipment and
a.
Oversize railroad cars (box or flat), road
transporters, or special barges designed for
handling large bulky objects.
b.
Large, bulky, one-piece cargoes, either enclosed
in crates or covered with canvas.
c. Priority handling of trains or highway convoys.
d. Special cars for transporting dangerous liquids,
cryogenic liquids, gas under high pressure.
e.
•Special measures taken to protect cargoes from
effects of inclement weather, shock, or observation.
Security measures.
a.
Restriction of areas, closing off of access roads,
restriction of population movement within the area.
b.
Special security measures on trains and highway
convoys.
c.
Deployment of security troops.
d. Deviations in flights of civil aircraft.
Surveying activities.
a. Extension of triangulation network (first order).
b. Gravimetric surveys.
c. Electronic surveys (HIRAN, radar trilateration, etc.).
- 27a -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 36
---
## Page 37
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Guided Missiles (Continued)
20395 Population movements.
a. Evacuation of civilian population.
b.
Creation of new settlements having unusually
large numbers of skilled workers.
c. Movement of military personnel into new areas:
20396: Construction Activities.
Forest clearing, when not associated with the
lumbering industry.
b. Land grading (for unidentified purposes).
c. Earth-moving and excavation.
d. Erection of large steel and concrete structures.
e. Construction of new military housing in remote
areas.
I. Transportation and assembly of large quantities
of construction materials and equipment.
g. Construction of underground installations.
h. Visits to construction projects by VIP's.
20397 Communication facilities.
a. Extension of land lines (telephone and telegraph)
particularly in remote areas.
b. Extension of radio facilities (including microwave).
20398.
Power facilities.
a. Construction of new, relatively small power plants
in isolated areas.
b. Use of mobile power plants.
c. Extension of power lines into remote areas.
- 2то =
SECRET
DocId:32627026 Page 37
---
## Page 38
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Guided Missiles (Continued)
20399 Commodities, tools, and equipment.
a. Installation of new, high-precision machine tools.
b. Installation of large, semi-automatic or fully
automatic welding equipment.
c. Consumption of large quantities of stainless
steel and aluminum sheet.
à. Consumption of copper, K-monel, magnesium alloys,
chrome, molybdenum, and titanium.
e. Consumption of large quantities of electric cable
and thin-wall tubing.
f. Receipt, storage, and use of dangerous liquids,
cryogenic liquids, and high pressure gases.
§. Production of miniaturized computers, gyros, and
accelerometers.
Installations and Equipment
2040 Description of any new naval, army, or air bases, or
any unusual weapons or military equipment that may have been supplied
by the sino-soviet Bloc. Date of observation, locations, quantities,
and originating country.
Detailed description and/or sketch of equip-
ment, indicating e.g., approximate dimensions, estimated caliber of
weapons, number of wheels per vehicle, size and shape of antennas, etc.
2041
Descriptions of any unusual aircraft, ships, or vehicle
seen
or reported.
Date of information, locations, quantities, and
originating countries.
2042
Descriptions of any new or unusual instruments that may-
have come from the Sino-Soviet Bloc. Date of information, quantities,
and originating country.
2043
Detailed information regarding location, staffing mission,
and operations of local investigative officers, formerly G-2 MINAR,
with particular emphasis on identification of the organizations to which
the Office belongs at present.
- 27c -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 38
---
## Page 39
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
General Questions on Cuban Navy (Continued)
d. Dry provisions
e.
Fresh provisions
f. General stores
g. Clothing
h. Medicinal stores
2073 List potential or critical shortages which may affect
logistic levels.
2074
What are the quantities of POL stocks on hand or
available on reporting date?
List designators of various types of
POL products.
2075
What is the Cuban Naval intelligence organization
ashore
and afloat?
Describe.
2076
What is the relation of naval intelligence to the other
Cuban intelligence activities?
Describe.
2077
Is there a training school for naval intelligence
personnel?
Describe.
2078 Io what extent are bloc personnel engaged in intelligence
activities?
Training?
2079: What counterintelligence practices are utilized by the
navy?
Discuss.
2080
What are the operational frequencies for Navy communica-
tions?
Fishing Fleet
20801
What is the military potential - availability and
adaptability. for military use; troop and cargo capabilities?
20802 Plans for utilization of fleet during emergency or
wartime.
- 31 -
SECRET
DocId:32627026 Page 39
---
## Page 40
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Maritime Activities
20803 Status and operations of Cuban merchant vessels.
20804
Patterns of Cuban merchant ships cabotage operations.
20805 Locations of fishing areas and operating
patterns of
fishing fleets.
- 31a..-
SE
CRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
40
---
## Page 41
SECRET
5/62
,2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Cryptologic Information and Material
Communications Cryptologic Activities
2081 Detailed data concerning the type and purpose of com-
munications,
technique of transmission and reception, associated
security devices and communications regulations and procedures uti-
Lized by foreign Armed Forces, Secret Police, and civil or state
agencies at any echelon. The
required data includes:
a. Precise location, organization, training, subordina-
tion, associated personality lists, and other pertinent order of battle
data.
b. Mission to include, communications procedures and
regulations involving cryptologic activities, call signs, frequencies,
schedules, authentication systems, signal operating instructions and
signal operating procedures.
c. Technical data providing identifying descriptions
and operating characteristics of communications and enciphering de-
ciphering equipment used in transmitting and receiving emcrypted traffic.
a. Relationship and influence with respect to communi-
cations matters,
technically and operationally, of the USSR (or other
foreign nations) on the Ministry of Defense, Armed Forces and civil or
state communications and electronic establishments of soviet Bloc (or
other foreign) countries.
e.
Original or copies of communications traffic and
message processing tapes, enciphered or plain text.
Cryptologic Equipment
..2082
Detailed technical data concerning all enciphering and
deciphering devices to include:
a.
Physical description, actual use, operating theory,
procedures and characteristics.
= 32 -
SEC
RET
DocId: 32627026 Page 41
---
## Page 42
•SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Cryptologic Equipment (Continued)
b. Maintenance procedures, techniques, problems.
..c. Identification and precise location of users.
&. Research and development on improved or new devices.
e. Production, sales and
shipping. data, military supply
channels and procedures.
L. Location and organization of laboratories, production,
supply, maintenance and distribution facilities!
Personality lists anddata on/or from individuals
concerned with any of the above.
h. Distinctive nomenclature, slang expressions, nicknames,
procedural language, double talk, associated with any of the above.
2083
Detailed technical data concerning codes and ciphers to
include:
of code and cipher system.
Description and explanation of types and composition
b. How created and by whom (individuals and organiza-
tions) :
Co.
Methods,
circumstances, and purpose of use.
d. From who received and distribution channels.
e. Identification (personality lists and data) of
holders of codes and ciphers or of individuals concerned with any of the
f. Originals, photographs and/or memory sketches of keys,
- 322 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 42
---
## Page 43
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Cryptologic Equipment (Continued)
charts, codes, ciphers, pad pages, encrypted and plain text messages,
authentication systems, logs, instruction manuals or other cryptologic
guidance.
Radio Agents
2084 Agent schedules; transmission and receiving frequencies;
copies of incoming and outgoing traffic; operational procedures and
techniques; details as to the code/communications training of agents;
modus operandi associated with agent communications procedures and con-
trolling personnel; originals, photographs or memory sketches of pad
pages, keys, codes, ciphers, etc.
Intercept and Crypt-Analysis (COMINT) Activities
Detailed data to include precise location, organization,
training, associated personality lists, subordination and other perti-
nent order of battle data.
2086
Mission to include, type, echelon and identification of
U.S. and other national communications on which foreign nations concen-
trate; scope of intercept coverage; techniques of intercept operations,
crypto-analytical techniques and methods; successes achieved; types and
2087 Technical and performance data providing identifying
descriptions and operating characteristics,: capabilities and methods of
use of intercept, direction finding, special identification techniques,
and intercept processing equipment; traffic analysis, and cryptanalysis.
Communications Countermeasures Signals
2088
General: Data concerning the type and purpose of commun-
ications signals, means of transmission
and associated operational
procedures, employed to reduce the effectiveness of U.S. or allied
..com-
munications equipment and activity.
- 320 -
SEC
RET
DocId:32627026 Page 43
---
## Page 44
id,
SE
RET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Communications Countermeasures Signals (Continued)
2089
Specific: Detailed data related to the above to include:
a. Precise location, organization, subordination, train-
ing, associated personality lists, and other pertinent order of battle.
b. Mission to include identification of U.S. or other
national communications equipment, activity or organization on which
foreign countermeasure action is concentrated.
employed.
c. Scope of capability, successes achieved, techniques
¿. Technical data providing identifying descriptions,
and operating characteristics of equipment utilized.
Relationship and influence of the USSR (or other
foreign governments) on countermeasure operations, and policies.
Electronic Information and Material
2090
Non-communicative Signal Intercept and Analysis (ELINT)
Activities.
a.
Detailed data to include precise location, organi-
zation, training, associated personality lists, subordination and other
pertinent order of battle.
b. Mission to include type, echelon and identification
of U.S: and other national non-communications signals on which foreign
nations concentrate,
scope of intercept coverage; techniques of inter-
cept operation; analytical techniques and methods; successes achieved;
types and distribution of reports produced.
c. Technical and performance data providing identifying
descriptions and operating characteristics, capabilities and methods of
use of intercept, direction finding and intercept analytical equipment
- 32c -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 44
---
## Page 45
S..E..C-R.E.T
5/62
2000 MILITARY (Continued)
Electronic Information and Material (Continued)
and electronic jamming and deception activities.
Non-communicative Signals
2091 General: Data concerning the type and purpose of
non-communications signals, means of transmission and reception,
associated security devices and procedures, to include:
a. Radars - offensive, defensive and passive.
b. Weapon detonator systems, e.g,. VT fuses.
c.
Guidance and control systems.
d.
Electronic counter and counter-countermeasures
systems.
2092 Specific: Detailed data related to 2091a above
to include:
Precise location, organization, subordination,
training,
associated personality lists, and other pertinent order
of battle.
b.
Mission: Operating procedures and regulations.
c. Technical data providing identifying descriptions
and operating characteristics of equipment utilized for non-
communications purposes, 2091a above.
d.
Parameters of signals omitted from non-communicative
equipment 2091a above.
e. Relationship and influence of the USSR (or other.
foreign governments)
on non-communicative signal systems, technically
and operationally, of the Ministry of Defense, Armed Forces, and
civil or state establishments of Sino Soviet Bloc (or other
foreign)
countries.
- 322 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 45
---
## Page 46
SECRET
5/62
2000 MIIIIARY (Continued)
Non-communications Countermeasures Signals
2093. General: Data concerning the type and purpose of non-
communications signals, means of transmission and associated operational
procedures, employed to reduce the effectiveness of U.S. or allied non-
communications equipment and activity.
2094
Specific: Detailed data related to the above to include:
a.
Precise location, organization, subordination,
training,
associated personality lists, and other pertinent order of
battle.
"b. Mission to include identification of U.S. or other..
national non-communications equipment, activity or organization on which
foreign countermeasure action is concentrated.
c. Scope of capability, successes achieved, techniques
employed.
d. Technical data providing identifying descriptions,
and operating characteristics of equipment utilized.
Relationship and influence of the USSR (or other.
foreign governments) on countermeasure operations, and policies.
Cuban Air Force - General
2095
Air Order of battle and state of readiness; including:
a. Unit designations; airfield or station location and
number and type of aircraft assigned.
2096
b. Flight patterns and frequency of flights.
Personnel
a. Air personnel strength, officer and enlisted in
- 32e
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 46
---
## Page 47
SECRET
5/62
2000 MILITARY (Continued)
Cuban Air Force - General (Continued)
trained and trainee status by type (pilot, aircrew, groundcrew).
b. Proficiency.
Sources of manpower, methods of procurement.
.:do General status of morale of aviation personnel.
•e General attitude towards Communism and Castroism.
EW/GCI Radar Order of Battle, including: number and
type equipment, Location name and coordinates, function, number of
officers and enlisted personnel, and period of operation for each.
2098 AAA Order of Battle, including: units, subordination,
location name and coordinates; quantity and nomenclature of equipment,
and number of officers and enlisted personnel for each unit; type of
fire control utilized.
Organizational position, command echelons and functions
of aviation in the government, military structure, and in relation to
the ground and naval forces.
2100 Training.
Number and location of flight schools and type train-
ing being given, to include number of students.
b. Number and location of USSR-Sov Bloc advisors in-
volved in Cuban training.
c. The extent of aviation training in the sov Bloc to
include; number of pilots/crews which have been or are receiving train-
ing in Czechoslovakia/USSR; date of departure from Cuba.
do The number of Bloc trained personnel who have re-
turned to Cuba.
- 32f -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 47
---
## Page 48
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Cuban Air Force - General (Continued)
2101
Key Air Force Personnel and Biographic Information.
a. List of key personnel to include: Air Commander,
Chief of Staff, Deputies.
b. Biographic data on above.
2102
Logistics.
a. Sources for logistic support and supplies.
b. Quantities of aviation fuel stocks and
storage.
c. Location of air depots.
d. Maintenance and repair policies, procedures, methods,
techniques and effectiveness.
e. Availability of spare parts.
•f. Aircraft serviceability rates.
g.. Fuel and oxygen servicing.
h. Purchase agreements with other nations involving
aircraft, missiles, and related equipment or strategic materials.
2103
Means of identification.
a. Describe aircraft markings.
b. Unit insignia.
2104
C. Describe air force uniforms and insignia.
Electronics.
a. Describe communications equipment in operation and/or
- 32g -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 48
---
## Page 49
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Electronics (Continued)
used by the air force.
b. Is there any indication that a communications
network, space vehicle tracking or electronic guidance system is
being installed under the guise of other construction at or near
construction sites?
2105
Ammunition Storage.
a. Location name.
b. Coordinates.
2106
c. Type and amount of ammunition stored.
Highway Construction.
2107
Air Facilities.
a. Is any new construction in progress at
existing air fields?
b. If so, what is the purpose of the construction?
C.
Are any new air fields being built? If so,
please
locate.
.. 33
- 32h.-
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
49
---
## Page 50
•SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Medical Facilities
2108
Hospitals: (include only the following)
Military Hospitals
Central Military Hospital (Finlay) in Havana
Casa
Blanca Military Hospital, Havana
Hospital Military Castillo Duany, Santiago de
Cuba
Hospital Militar, Pinar del Rio
Hospital Militar, Matanzas
Hospital Militar, Holguin
Hospital Militar, Camaguey
Hospital Militar, Santa Clara
Governmental Hospitals
Quinta la Covadonga, Havana
Quinta Benefica, Luyano
Asoc. de Dep. del Comercio, Jesus del Monte
Universidad Calixo Garcia, Havana
Saturino Lora, Santiago de Cuba
Leon Cuervo Rubio, Pinar del Rio
Sta. Isabel y San
Sanatian de
Nicolas, Matanzas
San Juan de Dios, Santa Clara
Sanat. de la Col. Espanola, Cienfuegos
Civil de Camaguey, Camaguey
Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes, Vedado (Havana)
General Freyre de Andrade, Havana
Indicate bed capacity; normal bed occupancy and bed
2109
capacity.
2110
2111
of floors.
2112
elevators?
2113
Street address of hospital.
Type of construction; brick, mortar, or frame; number
If building is of more than one floor, are there
What type, make, capacity?
Is the hospital electricity from a public utilities
- 321
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 50
---
## Page 51
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Medical Facilities (Continued)
2113 (Continued)
source or from self-contained generator? If source is from public
utilities, is there any emergency generator within the hospital?
Quality of power (both sources), current, phase, nominal voltage,
relative stability.
2114
Surface communications. Is there a paved road enter-
ing the hospital area? Is the hospital physically located near a..
railroad spur, port facility, or air strip? Is there a helicopter
pad In the hospital vicinity? If not, is there a suitable open area
in the near vicinity?
2115 Water used by the hospital; source, adequacy,
potability, type of treatment, if any.
2116 Method of waste and sewage disposal; burned,.. open
ditch, hauled away, city sewerage system.
2117
Surgical capability:
Number of operation rooms:
b.
Type of cases performed - minor surgery, chest,
abdominal.
make, model:
autoclave.
c. Type and condition of equipment, manufacture,
Include tables, lights, major instruments, sterilizers,
d.
Method of sterilization, autoclave, boiling,
chemical.
e. Is electrical system extended to operating. room,
1,e., plugs for use of power equipment?
2118
Hospital laboratory capability:
a. Type of tests and examinations performed..
b. Type and condition of major equipment, manu-
facture, model.
Include microscope, centrifuge, ovens.
Are there cold storage facilities within the
laboratory; capacity, type of unit, make, and model.
- 32j-
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 51
---
## Page 52
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Medical Facilities (Continued)
2118 (Continued)
a. Skill level and status of training of laboratory.
technicians.
2119 Blood bank capability:
Size of cold storage units, type, make. Are
they equipped with temperature recorders?
b. Is blood drawn locally or obtained elsewhere
and. stored only?
c. Are refrigeration units temperature controlled,
0° -1° centigrade?
d. Are compatability tests performed?
2120 X-ray capability:
a.
How many units are present? What size are units,
milleamperage/voltage? Type, model. Are there portable X-ray
machines?
2121
b. Are developing tank temperatures controlled?
c. Are spare parts kept on hand? Tubes, tube heads?
Communication system:
a: Within hospital.
b. With local community; telephone system--how
extensive, reliability.
2122
Manufacturing Laboratories (civilian):
a. Location.
b.
What products are manufactured?
In what quantity?
Include such items as gamma glöbulin, cathomycin, and albamycin.
32k
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 52
---
## Page 53
S
E C
R
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Medical Facilities (Continued)
2122 (Continued)
c. Cold storage facilities. Capacity, make and
model.
d.
Source and details of electrical data; current,
phase, nominal voltage, and relative stability.
e.
Facilities. Building construction and number
of structures.
f. Professional equipment. Type, condition, and
make.
g. Source and quality of water; treatment method.
h. Source of raw material, local or import.
2123 Medical Depots (military) or Medical Sections of a
General Depot:
a. Location.
b. Number of square feet of covered storage area..
c. Number and dimensions of buildings.
¿. Presence and capacity of cold storage area.
of refrigeration unit, make, and model.
e. Security measures in effect, i.e., pilferage..
theft.
f. Surface communications:
(1) Road net into depot; extent, paved.
(2) Proximity to railroad, port, airfiela.
Type
- 32L -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 33
---
## Page 54
SECRET
5/62
2000
MILITARY (Continued)
Medical Facilities (Continued)
2123 (Continued)
• ----
g. Is material handling equipment used? What
type? How many machines?
Capacity, make, and model. (Fork lifts,
conveyors, mechanical dollies).
h. Extent of medical maintenance performed:
(1) What type of testing equipment present?
(2) Training of repairmen/technicians.*
(3) Are spare parts kept on hand or reg-
uisitioned as needed?
1. Number of days' stock kept on hand.
j. Throughput capability - in tons per day.
k. Expansion capability.
1. Stock management system (requisition, stock
control, and issue procedures.)
2124
Refrigerated Storage:
Identify and locate refrigerated storage sites and/or
ice plants which could be used to store and reprocess shipments of
whole blood and other perishable medical items.
- 32m -
S
ECR
E T
DocId: 32627026
Page
54
---
## Page 55
SECRET
5/62
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Bloc Economic Aid (Continued)
Industrialization (Continued)
such as, general planning, construction scheduled, progress on
construction, production planned for, and the like.
3046 Identify and locate all industrial facilities and
projects completed or under construction in Cuba on the basis of
assistance from Bloc countries. (Identify the Bloc country
providing the assistance). Where possible, locate not only by city
but also by what section of the city and near what prominent landmarks.
3047 What portion of the total cost of any project is
accounted for by foreign exchange costs, i.e., cost incurred through
the necessity of importing materials, equipment, and outside technical
assistance?
What is the nature of the Bloc aid, i.e., direct grant,
credit, technical assistance; extent of cost covered by Bloc financial
aid, i.e., entire cost or only foreign exchange portion of cost!
3049
For all projects where credit is involved, what are
the repayment terms and interest rate?
3050
Specific projects - Using the above guidance, and the
questions in paragraph 3069, report on the following:
A steel plant is to be built in Cuba by the USSR.
Is it planned as an integrated steel combine or a rolling mill only?
The projected oil refinery at Santiago, also being
built through Soviet assistance.
c.
The shipbuilding yard at Mariel and the ship-repair
yard at Havana to be built with Polish assistance.
Soviet Bloc Technical Assistance
Information about technical assistance from the Bloc, its
general character and scope, as well as answers to the specifics
outlined below provide still another approach to assessing the Castro
regime's prospects for
success or failure. The general plans, their
execution and changes in these, are of continuing interest.
- 44 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 55
---
## Page 56
SE
CRET
5/62
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Industry (Continued)
General (Continued)
c. Laborers
d. Foremen
e. Management
f. Secretaries
3066
To what extent are the industrial plants guarded by
militia and where are the guards?
3067
Are there evidences of Sov-Sat technicians assisting
or supervising the plants?
Industrial Sectors of Interest
There is a continuing interest in the major sections of the
Cuban economy and the rate and general development patterns in these
sections.
3068
Information is needed on the following Cuban industries
in particular. (Specific questions applicable to these industries and
individual facilities are listed under paragraphs 3070 and 3094).
Extractive industries
a. nickel-cobalt
b.
copper
c. manganese
d. chromite
e. iron
3069 Manufacturing industries
• a. petroleum refining (See also para. 3050)
b. metallurgical (See also para. 3050)
- 47 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 56
---
## Page 57
SECRET
5/62
3000 ECONOMIC (Continued)
Industry (Continued)
Specific Information Needs on Key Industries (Continued)
d. Cargo aboard.
e. Dates in ports.
3128
Report any details known on Cuban trade, by commodity
and volume, with both Bloc countries and non-Bloc countries.
3129
Bloc ships, specific requirements.
a. Were special security precautions noted in port of
arrival?
b. Was the ship heavily or lightly loaded?
c.
Give type and quantity of cargo unloaded from ship
holds; if tanks or trucks state type.
d. Did the ship carry deck cargo? Give as complete
a description as possible,
i.e., crates the
size of a semitrailer,
boxcar, or automobile. (See Illustrations).
e.
Did the ship carry motor torpedo boats on deck and
was the ship towing any type of craft?
Civil Air
3130
Report sales of Bloc transport aircraft to Cuba.
31301 Total number of civil aircraft by types indicating
those currently operational.
31302
Civil aviation personnel strength by categories - i.e.
(a) jet pilots, (b) multi-engined pilots, (c) single-engined pilots;
(a)
engineers, (e) radio operators, (f) stewards; ground personnel:
(a) professional and administrative, (b) mechanics and other skilled
ground crews, (c) clerical and unskilled personnel.
31303 Established air corridors and civil airways, including
schedules and routes of all domestic air services.
- 55 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 57
---
## Page 58
SECRET
5/62
(
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Civil Air (Continued)
31304 Flight traffic control and communications facilities
including meteorological services or other aids to air navigation
31305 Number and location of training schools and aero clubs.
31306
Foreign airlines operating in Cuba including types of
aircraft used, flight numbers, frequencies, and routes.
3131
and any Bloc country.
Report information on civil air agreements between Cuba
3132
Cuba or beyond.
Report information on operations of Bloc airlines to
31321
Airline agreements or pooling arrangements involving
Cuban carriers or affecting Cuban services.
31322
CUBANA maintenance facilities including their availability
to other carriers, domestic or foreign.
31323
Other maintenance facilities available to civil air
operators plus fuel supplies
and services.
31324
for civil air administration.
Governmental controlling agency or organizational structure
31325
Aviation laws, Licensing requirements, etc.
31326
Principal personalities:
-(1) Government administrators;
(2) Airline officials; (3) Biographies of above.
31327
Means of identification: (1) aircraft markings; (2) uniforms
of airline personnel.
Local Level (Whenever personalities
are mentioned obtain as
complete a biographic sketch as possible).
3133
Automobile
a. Who are the outstanding garage men in your area?
Most trusted?
- 55a
SE
CRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 58
---
## Page 59
SECRET
5/62
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Industry (Continued)
Communications Industry
Microwave radio relay
National Level
3170 Describe the operation and facilities for microwave
radio relay of the Red Oficial de Comunicaciones por Microondas
(ROCMI) network.
a. Allocation of channels, 1.e., military, commercial,
etc.
b. List of routing indicators and abbreviations.
c. Location of stations Installed after RCA completed
Its initial installation.
d. Location of equipment within Havana, particularly
point of entry of microwave signal into Havana.
e. How traffic is routed on microwave.
f. Use and identification of cover names.
&. Information concerning communications operating
courses and nets.
3171 How many telephone channels are in use on this network
and what, If any, are the plans to enlarge the network?
3172 What are the nationalities of the technicians operating
this network?
3173 What is the current operating
status of the Ministerio
de Comunicaciones network?
3174 Who are the users of this network (military, militia,
other ministries, etc.)?
3175 What are the major operating difficulties?
3176 What is the operational status and identification
of the VHF and UHF stations connecting to the ROCMI network?
- 62 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 59
---
## Page 60
SECRET
5/62
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Industry (Continued)
Communications Industry (Continued)
Telephone System (Continued)
National Level (Continued)
3188 Describe the present quality of local and long-
distance service.
3189 How much of the open wirelines has been replaced by
cable? Where? What kind of cable was used?
Was the cable buried?
If any repeater stations are used along a cable route, where are
they located?
3190 Are there any plans for the use of direct long-
distance dialing?
Local Level
3191 Where are the telephone offices in yours and in
surrounding cities?
3192 Are they automatic
exchanges or are all calls handled
by operators?
3193 Are the telephone offices guarded? How?
3194. Are there pay phones in these cities?
3195 Did the withdrawal of coinage affect the use of these?
3196 List all remembered local telephone numbers. (Friends,
Important
people, Businesses, Militia, Fire department, City offices,
etc.)
3197 Where are the telephone exchange transfers, vaults,
substations (especially in smaller towns) located?
3198 What is the estimated number of telephones in your
area?
3199 Are telephones in good repair?
- 64 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 60
---
## Page 61
SECRET
5/62
3000 ECONOMIC (Continued)
Industry (Continued)
Communications Industry (Continued)
Telephone System (Continued)
Local Level (Continued)
3200
Does subject know anyone in the telephone business,
civil or military?
a. Operators
b. Linemen
c. Repairmen
3201
Give complete data on any other aspects of the
telephone system with which source is familiar.
Telegraph. System
Comment on the status of modernization of the Cuban
Telegraph system for such things as:
a. Installation of new wirelines.
b. The switching of traffic from open wirelines to
microwave radio relay.
c. The location of and equipment used in point-to-
point radio facilities for passing telegraph traffic and the extent
of such use by the Institute Nacional de la Reforma Agraria (INRA)..
a. The progress in establishing domestic Telex
networks and any plans for establishing international Telex connections.
Radio and Television
National Level
3203 What is the operational status of the main radio
broadcasting and television studio in Havana?
- 65 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 61
---
## Page 62
7)
SECRET
5/62
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Industry (Continued)
Communications Industry (Continued)
Radio and Ielevision (Continued)
National Level (Continued)
32031 When did Cuba begin broadcasting to other countries over
Radio Havana?
32032 Who is in charge of Radio Havana and who are his
assistants?
32033 Give the names of anyone else connected with Radio Havana
and tell what they do and where their political sympathies lie.
32034 Where are the studios of Radio Havana located? Where are
the transmitters?
•32035 Are any of Radio Havana's announcers and/or technicians
from tron Curtain countries?
32036
In what language does Radio Havana broadcast? Will any
new languages be added in the future?
32037 Radio Havanais used by various dissident groups. such as
the Guatemalan Information Cormittee to beam subversive programs to
specific countries. Who controls these groups? Can they broadcast
what they wish or are they merely "front" groups organized to give
the programs an aura of authenticity?
S
- 65a -
ECR
E
T
DocId: 32627026
Page
62
---
## Page 63
SECRET
5/62,
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Industry (Continued)
Communications Industry (Continued)
Radio and Television (Continued)
National Level (Continued)
3204 What is the status of the new international radio.
broadcasting station under construction at Bauta near Havana?
3205
What are the number and types of transmitters in-
stalled at the Bauta station and to what extent is the station
operated by Cuban or Bloc personnel?
3206 What government entity is responsible for the
selection and preparation of radio and television programs?
What is the degree of Bloc involvement in such programming?
3207
What are the plans for extending coverage of
international radio broadcasting service?
32071 Is it true that Radio Havana actually has few listeners
Do many people write to Radio Havana reporting on
in Latin America?
reception?
32072 Are the programs of the Havana station called The
English School of the Air beamed to the United States or are they
intended solely for Cuba? Does the director of Radio Havana also
direct The English School of the Air?
32073 What can you tell us about the Radio Havana announcer.
named Barbara Collins? Is Robert Williams on the staff of Radio
Havana? Is Marge McCurdy an announcer for Radio Havana?
32074 How many transmitters does Radio Havana have? What
are the powers of the transmitters? How do programs reach the
transmitters from the studios?
32075 Does Radio Havana have a monitoring section to listen
to broadcasts from other countries?
If so, describe the section giving
number of personnel employed, language capabilities, which countries
and stations are monitored, what type of equipment is used, location, etc.
= 66 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 63
---
## Page 64
SECRET
5/62
3000
ECONOMIC (Continued)
Industry (Continued)
Communications Industry (Continued)
Radio and Television (Continued)
National Level (Continued)
32076 What security precautions are taken at the Radio Havana
studios? Describe the studios, and if possible, draw a rough diagram
of the floor plan of the studios.
Local Level
3208
What are the most popular radio and television
programs?
3209
Estimate the number of television
sets in the area.
3210
Estimate the total radio and television audience.
3211
What is the quality of radio and television reception.
3212 Which radio and television personalities. are the most
and the
• least popular?
3213 What radio programs from foreign areas are popular?
3214 How much communist cultural material is broadcast?
What is the most effective type of communist propaganda? What is the
general reaction to this type of broadcast?
- 66a -
SECREI
DocId: 32627026
Page
64
---
## Page 65
SHERET
4000 GEOGRAPHIC
Detailed information on local conditions is required for certain
priority areas.
This settion is designed to provide guidance for
exploitation of a person's knowledge of local conditions. It should
be used as an adjunct to the preceding functional and technical
sections.
Sources from Guane and Clenfuegos areas should be interrogated
in the greatest detail on local conditions as wellias on their
occupational specialty.
Sources with knowledge of the following areas also should be
given precedence in processing for this type of information.
(Pinar del Rio Province):
(Havana Province):
(Matanzas Province) :
(Las Villas Province) :
(Camaguey Province):
(Oriente Province):
Guane and Esperanza
Havana
Matanzas, Colon
Calbarien, sancti Spiritus;
Santa Clara
Moron, Camaguey, Nuevitas, Santa Cruz del
Sur, Florida
Puerto Padre, Gibara, Mayari, Holguin,
Baracoa, Santiago del Cuba, Manzanillo
Physical Setting
Persons who have lived in an area and who have spent time in the
out-of-doors can provide unique information related to movement across
local terrain. The following questions are a guide to developing informa-
tion on local terrain conditions.
Relief and Drainage
4001 Describe trails in your area.
What is the normal
amount of traffic using them?
4002 Describe and locate fords across streams, including
the steepness and composition of the stream banks, type and density.
of vegetation, depth and swiftness of the strean.
4003 Are there any caves
that could be used for hiding or
caching supplies? Can sink-holes
be used for the same purpose?
Water Supply
4004 What are the local supplies of water?
-82 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 65
---
## Page 66
SECRET
5/62
5000 FACTORY MARKINGS
Valuable intelligence information on the Soviet Bloc can
be obtained from the study of factory markings appearing on equipment
produced in the BLOC.
Of particular interest are serial numbers
and other markings on Soviet Bloc aircraft, artillery, motor
vehicles (including trucks, prime movers, etc., and scientific
equipment of all types:) Also all material of Naval interest such
as, communications equipment, sonar, ordnance, ASW (including mines,
torpedoes, depth charges, ahead thrown weapons, etc.), propulsion
machinery, Hover and Hydrofoil craft, pharmaceutical and medical
supplies and equipment, etc.
5001 (Exploitation opportunities) Minimum markings exploitation
of each piece of equipment and itsscomponents would include:
a. Type designation
b. Serial number
c. Date of production
d. Manufacturer
These data usually are available on nameplate or stamped into the
metal parts of equipment.
Documents, especially technical passports
or logbooks, are a valuable source because of the exact production
dates therein.
If the data include unfamiliar characters such as
Cyrillic or Chinese, an approximation of the type designation, (that
is familiar letters
and numbers) often is enough to establish the
product type and manufacturer where information is available from
other sources. Obviously, considerable attention to accuracy of
serial number and date information is necessary. Collection by
photography is preferred, if practicable; physical impressions
by clay, tape or overlay pencil rubbings next; and lacking this,
accurately hand-copied data can be used.
5002 (Interrogation opportunities) Does source recall any
numbers and/or letter number combinations stenciled or stamped on
Bloc equipment in Cuba? Any supporting photographs or similar
materials should be forwarded with reporting.
- 115 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 66
---
## Page 67
SE
CRET
5/62
8000.
ANNEXES
A.
Selected List
of Cuban Industrial Organizations and Plants
B.. Map and List of Electric Power Stations
c. List of Cuban Sugar Mills (includes new names where known)
S
R
E
DocId: 32627026
Page
---
## Page 68
SECRET
ANNEX C
Cuban Sugar Mills
(
Former Name New Name
1. Andreita
2. Manuelita
3. Adelaida
Patria
5. Punta
Alegre
6. Violeta
7: San German
8. Fajardo
9.
Toledo
10.
Providencia
11.
Guipuzcoa
Mal Tiempo
City &
Province
Cruces, L.V.
14 July
Palmira, L.V.
Enrique
Varona
Gonzalez
Patria 0
Muerte
Falla, Moron,
C.
Moron, C.
Maximo
Gomez
Punta de San
Juan, C.
Primero de Cupeyes, Moron C.
Enero
Urbano
Noris
San Germain, O.
CDIE.
Manuel
Fajardo
San Antonia de
Los Banos, H.
Manuel
Martinez
Prieto
Marianao, H.
Osvaldo
Sanchez
Guines, H.
Esteban
Hernandez
Marti, M..
C-1
SECR
ET
Coordinates
22-18N
80-16w
22-15N
80-31W
22-10N
78-50W
22-06N
78-38W
22-24N
78-46W
21-57N
78-27W
20-37N
76-09W
22-50N
82-27W
23-03N
82-25W
22-48N
82-02W
22-58N
80-57W
DocId: 32627026 Page 68
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
2,722
6,237
14,309
2,551
6,237
8,289
7,598
1,701
5,103
2,835
3,175
---
## Page 69
SECRET
(
Former Name New Name
12. Santa Isabel
13. Trinidad
F.N.T.A.
14. Zaza
15. Fe
16. Corazon de
Jesus
17. Ulacia
18. Cunagua
19. Jaronu
20. Alava
21. Conchita
22. Mercedes
.23. Lugareno
24. Moron
City &
Province
Fomento, L.V.
Trinidad, I.V.
Placetas, L.V.
José Maria Camajuani, L.V.
Pérez
Mariana
Grajales
Carlos
Sitecito (Sagua),
L.V.
Rodrigo, I.V.
Balino
Bolivia
Cunagua, C.
Brasil
Jaronu
(Esmeralda),
Mexico
Banaguises, M.
Puerto
Alacranes, M.
Rico Libre
Seis de
Agosto
Sierra de
Cubitas
Manguito, M.
Lugareno, C.
Ciro ::
Redondo
Pina, C.
c-2
SECRET
Coordinates
22-06N
79-44W
21-50N
79-50W
22-17W
78-38W
22-26N
79-42W.
22-44N
80-04W
22-4IN-
80-12W
22-05N
78-20W
21-51N
77-58W
.22-47N
80-49W
22-45N
81-32W
22-38N
80- 52W.
21- 33N,
77-29W
22-01N/
78-44W
-
DocId: 32627026
Page 69
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
2,608
2,381
2,381
3,402
2,155
2,381
:9,526
12,836
4,763
4,002
3,856
6,237
11,340
---
## Page 70
SECRET
Former Name
New Name
25. Stewart
Venezuela
26.
Cuba
27. Santo
Domingo
28.
Es pana
29. Alto Cedro
30. Palma
31. Santa Ana
32. Miranda
33:
Jatibonico
34. Jobabo
35. Mercedita
36. Chaparra
37. Delicias
38. La Vega
City &
Province
Simon Reyes, C.
Cuba Libre' Pedro
Betancourt, M.
Juan Avila Union de Reyes,
M.
Espana
Perico, M.
Republicana
Loynaz Marcane, O.
Hechevarria
Dos Rios
Chile
Palma Soriano,
0.
Azua (San Luis)
0.
Julio A.
Mella
Uruguay
Miranda, 0.
Jatibonico, C.
Peru
Jobabo, 0.
Augusto
Cesar
Sandino
Cabanas, P. de
R.
Jesus
Menendez
Puerto Padre, O.
Antonio
Guiteras
Puerto Padre, 0.
Humberto
Abrad
Guayos, L. V.
0-3
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 70
Coordinates
. 21-44N
78-48W
22- 45N
81-18W
22-51N
81-30W
22-49N
81-01W
20-35N
75-58W
20-14N.
76-01W
20-16N
75-54W
20-23N
75-55W
21-55N
79-12W
20-50N
77-18W
22-59N
82-55W
21-10N
76-29W
21-11N
76-34E
22-030
79-28W
5/62.
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M .tons per
24 hours
9,922
5,670
2,528
6,600
3,062
4,536
2,495
5,670
5,103
5,103
2,041
8,062
9,752
1,701
---
## Page 71
SECRET
39.
Former Name New Name
Tuinucu
40.
Cespedes
City &
Province
Sancti Spiritus,
I. V.
Carlos
Cespedes, C.
Manuel de
Cespedes
-41. Elia
Colombia
42. Francisco
Elia (Guairmaro),
C.
Guayabal, C.
43. Manati
Amancio
Rodriguez
Argelia
Libre
Dumanecos, 0.
44. San Francisco Marta
Cruces, L. V.
Abreu
45. Algodones
Orlando
Majagua, C.
Gonzalez
46. Baguanos
Lopez Pena
Cueto, O.
47. Tacajo
48. Agramonte
49. Estrella
Fernando
de Dios
Igancio
Agranonte
Republica
Dominicana
Cueto, 0.
Forida, C.
Cespedes, C.
50. Vertientes
Panama
Vertientes, C.
51. Isabel
(Jamaica)
52. Los Canos
Honduras
Jamaica, 0.
Paraguay
Arroy Hondo, 0.
C-4
SECRET
Coordinates
21-59N
79-26W
21-35N
78-17W
21-OIN
77-25W
20-49N
77-35W
21-18N
76-55W
22-22N
80-14W
21-52N
78-59W
20-46N
76-03W
20-5IN
76-00W
21-31N
78-14W
21-36N
78-18W
21-19N
78-12W
20-11N
75-06W
20-03N
75-08W
DocId: 32627026 Page 71
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
4,536
4,356
6,010
7,450
9,639
1.928
3,402
3,742
3,742
4,536
4,736
8,992
1,814
2,041
---
## Page 72
SECRET
53.
Former Name New Name
Soledad
City &
Province
El Salvador Guantanamo, O.
54. Andorra
55.
Australia
56. Zorrilla
57. Maria
Antonia
58. Purio
59. San Pablo
60. Washington
61. El Pilar
62. San
Cristobal
Abraham
Lincoln
Artemisa, P de
R.
Jaguey Grande,
M.
Mario
Munoz
26 July
Los Arabos, M.
Santo Domingo,
I. V.
Perucho
Calabazar, I. V.
Figueredo
Zulueta, L. V.
Camilo
Manacas, I. V.
Cienfuegos
Eduardo
Garcia
Artemisa, P de
R.
Lavandero
Jose Marti
San Cristobal
P de R
63.
Hershey
Camilo
Santa Cruz Del
Cienfuegos Norte, H.
64. Rosario
Ruben
Aguacate, F.
Martinez
Villena
65. San Antonio
Boris Luis Madruga, F.
Santa
Colona
C-5
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 72
Coordinates
20-13N
75-13W
22-48N
82-49W
22-31N
81-06W
22-46N
80- 38W
22-33N
80-42w
22-40N
79-52W
22-21N
79-36W
22-35N
80-18W
22-51N
82-46W
22-41N
83-01W
23-08N
81-57W
22-40N
82-03W
22-55N
81-52W
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
2,495
2,495
2,619
1,928
907
2,268
1,701
3,629
3,062
3,402
7,371
2,381
3,027
---
## Page 73
SECRET
Former Name New Name
66. Araujo
Reinöld
Garcia
City &
Province
Manguito, M.
67. Tinguaro
Sergio
Gonzalez
Pericos, M.
68. Escambray
Fomento, I. V.
69. Perseverancia Primero
Real Campina,
de Mayo
L. V.
70.
Cape Cruz
Luis Enrique Ensenade de Mora
Carracedo
0.
71.
Niquero
Niquero, O.
72.
Tanamo
Frank Pais Cayo Mambi, 0.
73.
Constancia
74.
Portugalete Elpirio
Gomez
Encrucijada,
I. V.
Palmira, L. V.
75. Unidad
76. Amistad
Calabaza de
Sagua, L. V.
Amistad de Guines, H.
Los Pueblos
77• Gomez Mena
Hector
Molina
San Nicolas,
H.
78. Mercedita
Gregorio
Arlee
Manalich
Melena del
Sur, F.
Coordinates
22-36N.
80-54W
22-47N
80-57W
22-07N
79-45W
22-24N
80-45W
19-54N
77-19W
20-03N
77-35W
20-41N
75-15W
22-35N
79-52W
22-17N
80-25W
22-4IN
80-01W
22-51N
82-00W
22-46N
81-53W
22-50N
82-0.9W
C-6
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 73
(14)
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
2,619
4,536
1,814
4,536
2,041
3,402
3,969
2,495
2,177
1,928
2,880
6,804
3,969
---
## Page 74
SECRET
Former Name New Name
79.
Resolucion
Jose R.
Riquelmg
80.
Baragua.
(Ciego de
Avila)
81.
Florida
Ecuador
City &
Province
Quemados de
Guines, I. V.
Ciego de Avila,
C.
Argentina
Florida, C.
82.
Marcareno
Haiti
Manopla, C.
83. : Constancia
Abreu, L. V.
84. Covadonga
Antonio
Sanchez
Carreno, I. V.
85. Hormiguero
Espartaco
San Fernando de
Camarones, L. V.
86. Parque Alto Batalla de Rodas, L. V.
Peralejo
87. Pastora
Osvaldo
Herrera
88.
San Agustin Ramon
Balboa
San Juan de Los
Yeras, I. V.
Santa Isabel de
las Lajas, I. V.
89. Boston
Nicaragua
Banes, 0.
90.
Preston
Guatemala
Preston, 0.
91.
Bahia
Honda
Harlem
Bahia Honda P
de R
92.
La Francia
Sierra
Maestra
Los Palacios
P de R
C-7
SECRET
Coordinates
22-50N
C0-20W
21-42N
78- 39W
21- 33N
78-15W
20-43N
77-52W
22-14N
80-34W
22-17N
80- 51W
22-15N
80-20W
22-22N
80-29W
22-18N
80-04W
22-21N
80-18W
20- 54N
75-43W
20-47N
75-39W
22-55N
83-12W
22-31N
83-14W
DocId: 32627026 Page 74
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
1,814
7,371
3,402
3,865.
4,536
3,526
4,309
1,928
2,654
3,470
: 7,938
9,185
2,381
2,608
---
## Page 75
SECRET
Former Name
New Name
93.
Niagara
Manuel
Sanguily
City &
Province
Consolacion del
Norte P de R
94.
Orozco
95.
San Ramon
Pablo de
Cabanas, P de R
la Torriento
Brau
Orlando
Mariel, P de R
Nodarse
96. Havana
Havana
Libre
Cainito, H.
97. Josefita
Manuel
Nueva Paz, H.
Isla
98. Occidente
Pablo
Quivican, H.
Noriega
99. Portugalete Liberacion San Jose de Las
Lajas, H. -
100. Carolina
Gramma
Coliseo, M.
101. Dolores
Jaime Lopez Pedro Betancourt,
102. Dos Rosas
Fumerto
Alvarez
Cardenas, M.
103. Elena
Canasi, M.
104. Limones
105.
Porfuerza
Fructoso
Limonar, M.
Rodriguez
Jesus Rabi Calimete, M.
106.
Progreso
Jose Smith Mendez Carote,
C-8
SE C
REI
Coordinates
22-50N
83-31W
22-57N
83-02W
22-58N
82-47W
23-01N
82-37W
22-46N
81-45W
22-48N
- 82-24W
23-00N
82-13W
22-55N
81-16W
22-49N
81-17W
23-05N
81-18W
23-02N
81-43W
22-54N
81-25W
22-33N
80-51W
22-59N
81-11W
DocId: 32627026 Page 75
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
1,542
3,084
2,381
1,701
1,814
907
2,041
2,551
1,588
1,746
907
2,495
2,937
3,062
---
## Page 76
SECRET
Former Name
107. Puerto
New Name
Puerto
Libre
City &
Province
Canasi, M.
108.
San Ignacio
Agramonte, M.
109.
Santa
Amalia
110. Santa
Rita
I11. Soledad
112. Triunfo
113. Adela
114. Amazonas
115. Caracas
116. Carmita
117. Fidencia
118. Macagua
119. Narcisa
120:
Natividad
William
Soler
Victoria de Coliseo, M.
Yagujay
Baro, Agramonte,
M.
Julio
Reyes
Jovellanos, M.
Mario Nunez Limonar, M.
Remedios, Lo ,V.
Hiram Rojas Sancti Spiritus,
L. V.
Ciudad
Caracas
Santa Isabel de
las Lajas, L. V.
Vega Alta, L. V.
Fidencia, L. V.
Mata, L. V.
Yuguajay, L. V.
7 de
Noviembre
Sancti Spiritus,
L. V.
C-9
SECRET
Coordinates
23-07N
81-47W
22-40N
81-07W
22-55N
81-17W
22-41N
81-00W
22-49N
81-09W
22-59N
81-21W
22-23N
79-32W
21- 40N
79-26W
22-23N
80-16W
22- 30N
79-49W
22-21N
79-40W
22-36N
79-58W
22-20N
79-17W
21-39N
79-29W
DocId: 32627026
Page 76
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M. tons per
24 hours
1,474
1,701
2,551
2,268-
2,767
1,928
2,722
1,701
3,969
1,984
2,495
1,814
3,969
1,928
---
## Page 77
43.
SEC RET
Former Name
New Name
121.
Nazabal
Emilio
Cordova
122.
Nela
Obdulio
Morales
Torres
123:
Ramona
124.
Reforma
Marcelo
Salado
125. Resulta
Antonio
Finalet
126. San Agustin
Ramon
Balboa
127. San Isidro
128.
San Jose
Hermanos
Ameijerias
129.
Santa
Catalina
Carlos
Caraballo
130.
Santa
Lutgarda
E1
Vaguerito
131. Santa Maria
Efrain
Alfonso
132. Santa Rosa
10 de
Octubre
133.
Santa Teresa Santa
Teresa
Libre
City &
Province
Encrucijada,
L...V.
Mayajigua, L. V.'
Rancho Veloz,
L. V.
Caibarien, L. V.
Sagua La Grande,
L. V.
Remedios, L. V.
Quemados de
Guines, I. V.
Placetas, L. V.
Cruces, L. V.
Mata, L. V.
Ranchuello, L. V.
Ranchuello, L. V.
Sitiecito, L. V.
Coordinates
22-45N
79-44W
22-18N
79-06W
22-52N
80-21W
22- 30N
79-30W.
22-48N
80- 03W
22-21N
80-18W
22-47N
80-17W
22-19N
79-36W
22-23N
80-13W
22- 39N
79-58W.
22-22N
80-11W
22-22N
80-07W
22- 48N
80-06W
C.- 10
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 77
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
2,835
1,928
4,423
2,551
2,835
2,722
2,722
2,891
2, 722
2,381
2,438
2,347
3,402
---
## Page 78
ine,
134.
Former Name
Soledad
135. Vitoria
136.
Najasa
137. Santa Marta
138. Senado
139. Siboney
140. Algodonal
141. America
142. Baitony
143.
Borjita
144. Сасосит
145. Dos Amigos
146.
Ermita
DocId: 32627026
Page 78
SECRET
City &
New Name
Province
Pepito Tey Cienfuegos, L. V.
Coordinates
22-07N
80-20W
Alfredo
Alvarez
Mola
Candido
Gonzolez
Noel
Fernandez
Salvador
Rosales
America
Libre
LOS
Reinaldos
Paquito
Rosales
Cristino
Naranjo
Françisco
Castro
Ceruto
Yaguajay, I. V.
Hatuey, C.
Santa Marta, C.
Senado, C.
Marchena, C.
El Cristos, O.
Contramaestre,
0.
Almeida, O.
Dos Camines, 0.
Cacocum,
0.
Campechuela, O.
Costa Rica Near
Guantanamo, 0.
22-20N
79-15W
21-13N
77-33W
20- 48N
78-01W
21-34N
77-37W
21-16N
77-39W
20-09N
75-45W
20-15N
76-15W
20-11N
75-29W
20-12N
75-47W
20-45N
76-23W
20-14N
77-18W
20- 11N
75-24W
C-11
SECR
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
2,551
2,495
2,268
4,536
5,103
2,041
1,826
2,631
5,103
2,722
2,381
1,474
1,814
---
## Page 79
SECRET
Former Name
New Name
147•
Esperanza
Argeo
Martinez
City &
Province
Guantanamo, O.
148.
Estrada
Palma
149. Isabel
150. Mabay
151. Maceo
152. Rio Cauto
153. Romelie
Bartolome
Maso
Xava, O:
Marquez
Juan
Media Luna, 0.
Manuel
Mar quez
Arquimedes Julia Bayamo,
Colina
Antunez
Antonio
Cacocum, O.
Maceo
Jose M.
Rio Cauto, 0.
Figueredo
Hector
Infante
Yateras,
GGuantanamo, 0.
154. Salvador
Calicito, O.
155. San Antonio Manuel
Tames
156.
San Ramon
Yateras,
Guantanamo, 0.
• San Ranon, 0.
157.
Santa
Cecilia
Jorge
Prieto
158. Santa Lucia
Rafael
Freire
Torres
Coordinates
20-12N
75-10W
20- 10N
76-5TW
20÷08N
77-27W
20- 21N
76-47W
20-45N
76-29W
20- 32N
76-56W
20- 10N
75.-05W
20-17N
77-14W
20-09N
75-03W
20-13N
77-22W
20-08N
75-08W
21-03N
76-02W
5/62
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
2,268
3,175
3,402
2,551
2,041
4,536
1,701
2,155
1,588
2,268
(Converted
to chicken
farm)
1,701
4,196
Near Guantanamo,
0.
Santa Lucia, 0.
C-12
S. E
CRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 79
---
## Page 80
SECRET
5/62
159.
160.
Sofia
161. Union
Former Name New Name
Santa Regina Enidio
Diaz
Machado
Ranulfo
Leiva
Rafael
Reyes
City 8e
Province
Ceiba Fuega,
0.
Sofia, Bayano,
0.
San Luis, O.
Cane
Grinding
Capacity
M tons per
24 hours
2,268
Coordinates
20-13N
77-20W
20-19N
76-58W
20-12N
75-51W
2,041
1,928
C-13
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
80
---
## Page 81
SECRET
ANNEX K
24222
NPIC REPORTS
This annex contains extracts from NPIC publications such as
the Mission Coverage Index (MCI) and the Situation Summary (SITSUM).
The annex is arranged alphabetically by geographic area.
Within
each area the information is reported chronologically. This informa-
tion was widely disseminated throughout the intelligence community,
including some 50 U. S. domestic and overseas installations. The
first figure appearing in each extract refers to the mission number,
and the date is the date of overflight.
SECRET
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 13526, SEC. 3.5
NLK-10-120
BYMAD NARA. Date 12/13
DocId: 32627026
Page
81
---
## Page 82
DocId: 32627026
Page
82
-ANNEX
NPIC Reports
ALTO CEDRO AREAR
ARIILLERY TRAINING SITE
CU 2027N 87558H
3078 MCI
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
3 NM SOUTH OF ALTO CEORO AND CENTERED AROUNO
COVERS APPROXIMATELY 25-38 SO MI.
NUMEROUS AW POSITIONS, PERSONNEL TRENCHES,
AND FA POSITIONS, NUMEROUS BARRACKS IN
WOODED AREAS ALONG STREAM BEDS. 15 FA
PIECES JUST EAST OF SABARA. 18 CAMOUFLAGEO
PROBABLE FA PIECES ONE NM EAST OF SABARA.
APPROXIMATELY I& TRUCKS IN AREA EAST OF
SABARA. LANDING STRIP ZIPOO X TO FT ORIENTEO
NNE/SSH IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF SABARA. PUSSIELE
LANDING STRIP 12,408 X 130 FII ORIENTEO
NWISE UNCER CONSTRUCTION 1.5 NM SW OF SABARA.
138 ETI ORIENTED NWISE UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
1.5 NM SOUTHWEST OF SABANA.
SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS
AT LEAST 9 ADDITIONAL 6 GUN FLA
POSITIONS
(UNOCCUPIED) NOTEO SINCE MAY 62=
NO MISSILE ACTIVITY.
---
## Page 83
DocId: 32627026
Page
83
ANTON
RECIO
AREA, MILITARY
INSTALLATION
CU
3683 SITSUM 29
JUN 62 REPORTS
NM NORTH OF ANTON RECIO, AT UTM GRID
TIQNO 485537 PAMS SERIES E7Z3, SHEET 408211.
2 BUILDINGS AND SEVERAL UNOCCUPIEO
EMPLACEMENTS.
9 CANVAS-COVERED PROBABLE
I8 TRUCKS PARKED IN AREA.
3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
•T NM NORTH OF
ANTON RECIO.
INSTALLATION CONTAINS 2 PROBABLE BARRACKS,
ONE PROBABLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING, AND 8
HUTS. GROUND-CLEARING ACTIVITY IN AREA.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 9 CANVAS-COVERED
TANKS,
AND & TRUCKS.
•-..
---
## Page 84
DocId: 32627026
Page
84.
BAHIA HONDA,
PORT FACILITIES
CU
2255N
083114
3IOT STTSUM T4 OCT 62 REPORTS
VESSELS - ONE FREIGHTER.
UNIDENTIFTED EQUIPMENT IN PORT AREA. A SECURED STORAGE
AREA ON PUNTA GERARDO CONTAINS AT LEAST 25 PIECES OF
UNTOENTIFTEO EQUIPMENT. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION•
---
## Page 85
DocId: 326
Page
85
Parame
BAHIA HONDA SAM STTE
G-3888, 29 AUG 62 REPORTS.
& NM NW OF BAHTA HONDA AT 22-57-32N
883-17-28W.
SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. FOUR
UNREVETTED LAUNCH POSITIONS COMPLETEO AND
2 UNDER CONSTRUCTION. TWO LAUNCHERS ARE
NET-COVERED. FRÜIT SET RADAR IS PRESENT AND
SURROUNDEO BY VERTICAL NETTING. SIX VANS AND
& MISSILE TRANSPORTERS
ARE PRESENT AND NET
COVERED. APPROXIMATELY
IS TENTS AND 1S
VEHICLES IN AREA.
3101 SITSUM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS
MISSILE LAUNCHERS AND GUIDANCE AREA ARE NOW REVETTED.
NO OTHER APPARENT CHANGE SINCE LATE AUG 62. INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
CU 2257N 083174
---
## Page 86
DocId: 32627026
Page
86
BANES AREA, PORT FACILITIES
CU. 2855N 87542W1
3100 SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS
VESSELS -- 2 PF-TYPE SHIPS MOORED AT BANES PIER.
GROUND SCRAPED CLEAR IN SE SECTION OF BANES PORT.
APPROXIMATELY 15 PIECES OF UNTOENTIFIED EQUIPMENT.
PORT AREA• INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
---
## Page 87
DocId: 32627026
Page
87
BANES
• AREA PROBAULE ELECTRONICS SITE
6-3788.
62 REPORTS.
NM ENE OF BANES.
SITE CONTAINS 2 LARGE AND 2 SMALL REVETMENTS
EQUIPMENT,
ADDITIONAL GENERATOR OR
VEHICLE REVETMENTS, AND ABOUT 38 TENTS.
CU
2058N
075381
---
## Page 88
DocId: 326
27026
Page
88
BANES CRUISE-MISSILE SITE
CU
2858N 07539W
G- 3888, 29 AUG 62 REPORTS.
• NA ENE OF BANES AT
20-58-S0N 875-38-10W.
SAM LAUNCH AND RADAR EQUIPMENT STORED IN
OPEN AREA ADJACENT TO PROBABLE ELECTRONICS
FACILITY.
EQUIPMENT
-- B MISSILE TRANSPORTERS WITH
CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERS. 7 ELECTRONICS
VANS AND 20 MISCELLANEDUS VEHICLES.
3093 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS THE FOLLOWING MAJOR
CHANGES NOTED SINCE LATE AUG 62 -- CONSIDERABLE
PROGRESS IN SITE CONSTRUCTION IS EVIDENT. LAUNCH AREA
KEVETMENTS APPEAR COMPLETE, AND SITE IS OPERATIONAL. A
PROBABLE MISSILE IS LOCATEO ON THE NORTH LAUNCHER.
SEVEN CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE TRANSPORTERS AND ONE
EMPTY TRANSPORTER ARE PRESENT. TWO ADDITIONAL
RECTANGULAR REVETMENTS ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION OPPOSITE
VEMICLE PARKING AREA• THO NEWLY CONSTRUCTEO MISSILE-
HOLO REVETMENTS, ONE OF WHICH IS OCCUPIED, ARE DIRECTLY
BEHINO EACH LAUNCHER. A NEW REVETMENT IS UNDER
CONSTRUCTION ADJACENT TO THE OCCUPIED MISSILE-HOLO
REVETMENT. ALL PREVIOUSLY REPORTED REVETMENTS LOCATED
THE LAUNCHERS NOW APPEAR OCCUPIED.
SIRA SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS
THE FOLLOWING CHANGES NOTEO SINCE LATE SEP 62 --
TWO NEW REVETMENTS ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN FRONT OF
AND BETWEEN THE LAUNCH POSITIONS.
AREAS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION NOTEO DIRECTLY WEST OF
TENT AREA.
THE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED PRODABLE MISSILE ON THE NORTH
LAUNCHER
IS NOW CANVAS-COVERED.
---
## Page 89
DocId: 32627026
Page
89
CAMAGUEY AREA,
LITARY AREA
3965 SITSUM
2 FEB 62 REPORTS
LOCATEO 6O5 MILES SE OF CAMAGUEY.
A FENCEO MILITARY AREA SERVED BY
AN ALL-
WEATHER.
Z-LANE ROAD. CONTAINS 3 BARRACKS,
BUILDINGS, AND 1 BUILDING UNDER
CCMSTRUCTION• ALSO 3 OCCUPIED LIGHT
IPOSS 37.
MMS ANTIAIRCRAFT ARTILLERY EMPLACEMENTS AND
PARKED HOWITZERS (POSS 122 MMI.
CU
2120N
077400
---
## Page 90
DocId: 32627026
Page
90
CAMAGUEY AREA, MILITARY AREA
3065 SITSUM
2 FEB 62 REPORTS
LOCATEO 5.5 MILES SE OF CAMAGUEY AND
4 MILES
§ OF CAMAGUEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT.
APPEARS CAPABLE OF
CONTAINS 4
ACCORMODATING APPROX 165 MEN BUTLDINGS ANO
BARRACKS, 3 ADMIN
NUMEROUS
STORAGE/SUPPORT PARTIALLY
OBSCURED BY VEGETATION IN THE AREA. 5 SMALL
EXCAVATIONS SIMILAR TO THOSE IN THE TRACKEO
VEHICLE PARK AT SANTA CLARA. NO EVIDENCE OF
VEHICLE
ACTIVITY ARE DISCERNIBLE. AREA 15
DEFENDED BY 2-LIGHT ANTIAIRCRAFT ARTILLERY
GUNS.
CU 2121N
07750W
---
## Page 91
DocId: 32627026
Page 91
CAMAGUEY AREA, MILITARY ACTIVITY
3071 MCT 15 MAR 62 REPORTS
4.6 NMESE OF CENTER OF CAMAGUEY.
ONE
T-SHAPED BUILDING.
6 GABLE-ROOFEO
BUILDINGS,
4 OUG-OUT REVETMENTS, AND
AW POSITIONS IN SMALL WOODEO AREA AT
21-21
45N
077-50-45W•
CU 212IN 07750W
---
## Page 92
DocId: 32627026
Page
92
€.
CAMAGUEY AREAT
MILITARY
INSTALLATION
3078 NCT
MAY 62 REPORTS
NM ESE OF
CAMAGUEY.
SARRACKS-TYPE
BUILDINGS, 2 STORAGE
BUTLOINGS, NUMEROUS TRENCHES ANO
AN POSITIONS
EAST
BARRACKS
CU
2122N 07747W
---
## Page 93
DocId: 32627026
Page
93
CAMAGUEY AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION
CU 2117N
078014
3478 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS APPROXIMATELY 8 NM SWOF
CAMAGUEY ON ROUTE: 5-39.
MILITARY AREA CONTAINING
RANCH BUILDINGS, 4 POSSIBLE
BARRACKS.
3 EXCAVATED
VEHICLE SHELTERS, AND NUMERGUS WEAPONS
EMPLACEMENTS
WHICH APPEAR TO BE UNOCCUPIEO.
A GOOD INTERNAL ROAD
NETWORK IS ALSO PRESENT. VEHICLES -- IO CARGO VEHICLES.
---
## Page 94
DocId: 32627026
Page
94
C2007
CAMAGUEY
AREA.
MILITARY INSTALLATION
CU 2123N 07756H
3070 KCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
2.5 NM
WNW OF ROUNDHOUSE AT RAILROAD YARDS.
MILITARY
AREA CONTAINING 5 ADMINISTRATIVE
BUILDINGS OF WHICH 3 ARE TWO-STORIED,
BARRACKS, ONE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/STORAGE
BUILDING, A THEATER, GYMNASIUM, AND 7
UNIDENTIFIED BUILDINGSI A MICROWAVE STATION
IS ALSO PRESENT:
VEHICLES -- 12 BUSES.
3979 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
STRONG POINT LOCATED 21-20-BON 877-49-204
CONTAINS 4 GABLE-ROOFED BUILDINGS ANO 2
UNOCCUPIED AAA EMPLACEMENTS SURROUNDEO
NUMEROUS TRENCHES AND PERSONNEL EMPLACEMENTS.
SITSUM 18 JUN B2 REPORTS
ÖNE BLOG UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND 4 TRUCKS.
UNUSUAL ACTIVITY.
3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
HEADOUARTERS AREA CONSISTING OF 6 LARGE
BARRACKS-TYPE BUILDINGS, 2 SUPPORT BUILDINGS,
AND 15 OTHER BUILDINGS.
VE ICES SITSUA IZ JUL 62 REPORTS
INFORMATION ON CAMAGUEY MILITARY
---
## Page 95
DocId: 32627026
Page 95
NSTALLATIONS • IS AS FOLLOWS
MILITARY HEADQUARTERS LOCATED IN NE
SECTION OF CAMAGUEY -- NO APPARENT CHANGE
FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62•
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- I0 SEMI-TRAILERS AND
CARS/JEEPS AT WAREHOUSE LOADING DOCK.
MILITARY TRAINING INSTALLATION 3.5 NM NNE
CAMAGUEY AT SITE OF FORMER BERNABE SANCHEZ
ADAN AIRFIELD -- BUILDINGS STILL UNDER
CONSTRUCTIONe NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE JUN
62• VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 5 TRUCKS PARKED
NEAR MAINTENANCE BUILDING.
ARTILLERY TRAINING AREA Y NN ESE OF
SARAGUEY - 7 BARRACKS VARYING IN SIZER
SEVERAL UNOCCUPIED FIELO ARTILLERY
EMPLACEMENTS. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 6 TRUCKS,
2 FIELD ARTILLERY PIECES.
_ MILITARY AREA LOCATED 4•5 NM ESE OF
CAMAGUEY -- 2 BARRACKS, 2 UNOCCUPIED LIGHT
AAA EMPLACEMENTS. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT --
TRUCK NOTED. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
5. MILITARY BARRACKS AREA 5.5 NM ESE OF
CANAGUEY -- 4 BARRACKS, 6 UNOCCUPIEO LIGHT
AAA EMPLACEMENTS• AND 3 TRENCHES IN AREA.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- ONE TRUCK AND 6
POSSIBLE LIGHT ANA PIECES.
B• MILITARY AREA LOCATED 7.5 NM. SSW OF
CAMAGUEY
-- 7 PROBABLE BARRACKS, SEVERAL
OTHER BUILDINGS, 3 PROBABLE VEHICLE SHELTERS,
AND 12 UNOCCUPIED AAA/AW EMPLACEMENTS.
VEHICLESTEQUIPKENT -- 28 TRUCKS THROUGHOUT
AREA.
---
## Page 96
DocId: 32627026
Page
96
CAMAGUEY AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE 2 MAY 62.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 54
VEHICLES PARKEO IN OPEN AREA.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3082
• SITSUM 16
JUN 82 REPORTS
ONE BLOG UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND 4 TRUCKS.
UNUSUAL ACTIVITY.
SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
SECURED AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION CONTAINING
ONE LONG VEHICLE SHED, AND SEVERAL SMALL
BUILDINGS.
VEHICLES
-- NONE.
SITSUM 29 AUG 82 REPORTS
INFORMATION ON THE CAMAGUEY MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS IS AS FOLLOWS -- MILITARY
HEADGUARTERS LOCATED IN NE SECTION OF
CAFAGUEY, 1.8 NM SW OF SW END OF
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RUNWAY -- NO APPARENT
CHANGE SINCE JUL 62. INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
MILITARY TRAINING INSTALLATION 3.5 NM NNE OF
CAMAGUEY AT SITE OF FORMER BERNADE SANCHEZ
ADAN AIRFIELD -- INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
ARTILLERY TRAINING AREA 7 NM ESE OF
CAMAGUEY -- NO REPORT.
MILITARY
IRAINING AREA LOCATED 4.5 NM ESE OF
CAMAGUEY - NO REPORT.
MILITARY BARRACKS AREA 5.5 NA ESE OF
CAMAGUEY AT EL PENON -- NO REPORT.
MILITARY AREA LOCATED 705 NN SSH OF
CAMAGUEY
== INCOMPLEIE INFORMATION.
CU
2123N 07757W
---
## Page 97
DocId: 32627026
Page
97
CAMAGUEY INTERNATIONAL AIRFIELD
CU 2125N 87751W
6-3079.
22 MAY 62 REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT
=- TOTAL OF 18%
INCLUDING
3 FAGOT/FRESCO, ONE PROBABLE FAGOT/FRESCO,
LIAISON (POSSIBLY L-GO BRIGADIR). ONA LANESONSONE
MAPE, ONE POSSIOLE
TYPE TRUCKS SOUTH OF SW END
SEA FURY. TORENWAY. INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
G- 3088.
JUNE 6Z REPORTS. AIRCRAFT COUNT
3 L- 60 BRIGADYR, ONE C-4,7. ONE
FAROTALLETO SINGENG CAME P TOKEN CAN NOTEO IN
DEFENSES, NO
NOT OBSERVED.
G- 30820
18 JUNE
62 REPORTS.
NO CHANGE TO
FACICITIES.
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. AIRCRAFT ==
A TOTAL
I1 INCLUDING
-= 5 FRESCOA 1 CRATE, I C-47.
1 HOUND •
LIAISON, 1
BRIGADYR AND
I DERELICT SEA FURY:
CONSTRÜCTION CONTINUING ON AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS.
---
## Page 98
DocId: 32627026
Page
98
G- 3083.
29 JUNE 62 REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT --
TOTAL
INCLUDING & FRESCO, 2 CRATES ONE C-47, 2 LIAISONe
ONE BRIGADYRA AND ONE UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE-ENGINE.
ONE DERELICT SINGLE-ENGINE. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. NO
CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MAY 62. AIRCRAFT REVETHENTS
STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION• INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
G-3085, 12 JULY 62 REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT -
TOTAL
160 INCLUDING 6 FAGOT/FRESCO, 5 LIAISON, 2
BRIGADYR!
ONE HOUND. ONE CRATE (TAKING OFFIA AND ONE.
DERELICT
FURY. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. TOKEN RADAR IN PLACE ON
MORTH SIDE OF EAST END OF RUNWAY. NO OTHER APPARENT
CHANGES SINCE JUN 620
SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT --
A TOTAL OF 18, INCLUDING
18 FAGOT/FRESCO, O BRIGADYR, ONE
UNIDENTIFTED SINGLE-ENGINE, AND ONE DERELICI
SEA FURY.
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE
JUL 02. INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
G-3088• 23 AUG 62 REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT
-- TOTAL OF 18, INCLUDING 14 FAGOT /
FRESCO, 2 LIAISON, ONE CAB AND ONE CRATE.
NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3UB9 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT
13 FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 LIAISON, ONE
C47, AND ONE
CRATE•
NO APPARENT CHANGE
IN FACILITIES SINCE
JUN 62. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3898 SITSUM 5 OCT 62 REPORTS
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3100
SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- NONE NOTED.
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
---
## Page 99
DocId: 32627026
Page
99
• I
CAMILO CIENFUEGOS (SANTA CLARA) AIRFIELO
CU
G- 30789
1962 REPORTS.
RUNWAY APPEARS
COMPLETE, I
BUT COULO DE EXTENDED AT EITHER ENO.
CITUMINOUS SURFACINGO 100 TENTS ON HARDSTANDS• SEVEN OF
11 REVETHENTS ON THE WEST END HAVE BEEN AT LEAST
PARTIALLY EARTH-COVERED. DEFENSES -- 3 UNOCCUPIEO ANA
POSITIONS NORTH OF RUNWAY AT WEST END. TRENCHES OFF
END OF RUNWAY,
TRENCHES AND AN POSITIONS AROUND
RADAR INSTALLATION, 6 AA EMPLACEMENTS, 3
OCCUPIED, WEST OF
TOKEN RADAR
SITE. AIRCRAFT --
FAGOT/FRESCO, AND 2. CRATE• APPROXIMATELY 95
OBSERVED.
G- 3079, 22 MAY 1962 REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF
INCLUDING 3 MIG-15, 6 LIAISON-TYPE, AND ONE
HELICOPTER CHARE-TYPET. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES,
FACILITIES, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIOS FACILITTES
SINCE 2 MAY GZ. NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS.
G- 3080, 6 JUNE 1962 REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT -- Z FAGOT/
MIDGET, ANO 7 LIAISON-TYPE. NO APPARENT CHANGE
DEFENSES,
FACILITIES, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
C-3081, 15 JUNE 19G2 REPORTS.
NO APPARENT CHANGES.
AIRGRAFT --
A TOTAL OF 5 INCLUDING 3 FAGOT/FRESCO, 2
COLT. INCOMPLETE INFO.
G-3082, 18 JUNE 19G2 REPORTS. NO CHANGE
FACILITIES NOTED. AIRCRAFT -- 2 FRESCO AND 2 PROBABLE
COLT. INCOMPLETE INFO.
G- 3083, 29 JUNE
1962 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF
9, INCLUDING 6 FAGOT/FRESCO, AND 3 LIAISON-TYPE.
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE.
PREVIOUSLY NOTED TOKEN RADAR NOT
OBSERVED. NO OTHER APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINGE
MAY 62. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON COVERED
AIRCRAFT REVETNENTS.
2229N
07955W
---
## Page 100
DocId: 32627026
Page
100
.wv.1
G- 3085, 12 JULY 1962 REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL
OF 8.
INCLUDING 7 FAGOT/FRESCO AND ONE HARE. RUNWAY
SERVICEABLE• CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING ON COVERED PARKING
AREAS AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE PARKING. APRON.
DEFENSES -- 4 OCCUPIED 6-GUN LIGHT AAA POSITIONS ALONG
PERIPHERY OF AIRFIELD. TOKEN RADAR AGAIN IN PLACE ON
HILL NORTH OF RUNWAY. NUMEROUS TENTS NOTEO IN VICINITY
OF PARKING APRON AND LOOP TAXIWAY.
3886 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 6P INCLUDING
5 FAGOT/FRESCO, AND ONE LIAISON.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
G- 3089, 29 AUG OZ REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT --
IOTAL OF 7. INCLUDING 5 FAGOT/
FRESCO, ONE HOUND, AND ONE HARE.
SEVEN COMPLETED EARTH-COVERCO REVETMENTS ANO
1 UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT WESTERN END OF
AIRFIELO,
AND Y COMPLETED EARTH-COVERED
REVETMENTS
AT EASTERN END.
SITSURE 5 SEP G2 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- A
• TOTAL OF 152 INCLUDING ONE
FISHBED, 11
ONE HOUND.
FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 BRIGADYRI AND
FOUR PROPABLE AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES
144 X 8.5 FT) IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF FISHBED
TAXIWAY.
PROBABLE SHIPPING CRATES
(APPROXIMATELY 44 X 8.5 FT) APPROXIMATELY
41500 FT WNH OF RUNWAY.
32 SQUAD TENTS, 9 LARGE SQUAD TENTS, 4
MECIUM-SIZE TENTS.
AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS -- FOUR COVERED
REVEINENTS, 3 EARTH-COVERED REVETMENTS,
2 REVETMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT WEST ENO
OF RUNWAY. FIVE EARTH-COVEREO REVETMENIS AT
EAST END OF RUNWAY.
---
## Page 101
DocId: 32627026
Page
101
POSITIONS
4 OCCUPIED O-GUN BATTERIES
AND ONE OCCUPIEO 3-GUN BATTERY ON PERIPHERY
OF AIRFIELO.
TOKEN RADAR
AND 4 VANS ON HILL NORTH OF
RUNWAY. R
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. NUMEROUS
VEMICLES AND
EQUIPMENT THROUGHOUT THE
EARTH SCRAPING EAST OF RUNWAY. NO APPARENT
CHANGE IN
FAGILITIES SINCE AUG 62..
---
## Page 102
DocId: 32627026
Page
102
CAMPO COLUMBIA MILITARY INSTALLATION
CU
3078 MCI
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES OR
DEFENSES SINCE APR 62.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 20
VEHICLES PARKED NEAR REVIEWING STAND, AND
APPROXIMSTE SUAS 22 BUSE 62 APORR POOL AREA.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 44 BUSES IN MOTOR
POOL, a CARS AND 2 BUSES AT REVIEWING STAND.
NO APPARENT CHANGES IN FACILITIES AND
DEFENSES EXCEPT
THAT LIGHT AAA POSITIONS
ARE NOT APPARENT.
30&A SITSUM
6 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT OBSERVED.
56 BUSES AND NUMEROUS CARS IN AREA.
NO APPARENT CHANGE TO FACILITIES SINCE MAY 62.
... 3UBZ SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGES TO FACILITIES SINCE
APRIL 62.
VEHICLES
BUSES IN MOTOR
POOL
AND 50
MISCELLANCOUS VEHICLES THROUGHOUT
SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
AREA.
VEHICLES -- 43 BUSES NEAR AOMINISTRATIVE
BUTLOING.
I APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE APR 62.
3484 SITSUM
8 JUL 62 REPORTS
VEHICLES -- APPROXIMATELY 50 BUSES NEAR
ADMIFISTRATIVE BUILOING.
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES• INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION•.
SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT
46 BUSES IN MOTOR PARK
AND APPROXIMATELY 12 OTHER VEHICLES IN CAMP
ARCA EARTH SCARRING INDICATING POSSIBLE NEW
CONSTRUCTION IN CENTER AND SW SIDE OF AREA.
3R8U SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
SITES IN CENTER AND ON SW SIDE OF AREA. NO
CHANGES IN FACILITIES OR DEFENSES SINCE
APRIL 1962.
VEHICLES
185 BUSES
IN PARKING AREA AND
7 JUST OUTSIDE OF CONPOUND.
2305N
082261
---
## Page 103
DocId: 32627026
Page 103
CAMPO FLORIDA POSS CRUTSE-MISSILE SITE
CU
2386N
30B8 SITSUM, 29 AUG 1962 REPORTS A NEW MISSILE
INSTALLATION HAS BEEN LOCATED 9.5 NA EAST OF HAVANA,
3.7 NN WSW OF CAMPO FLONIDA AT 23-46-30N782-11-864.
INSTALLATION IS SITUATED APPROXIMATELY 4 NM SOUTH
FROM. THE COAST AT AN ELEVATION APPROXIMATELY 150
FEET. THE SITE IS SECURED BY A FENCE AND CONSISTS OF
SOME EQUIPMENT THAT IS SIMILAR IN BOTH CONFIGURATION:
AND GENERAL LAYOUT AS THAT FOUND AT MISSILE STTES NEAR
BANES AND SANTA CRUZ DEL NORTE. THE EQUIPMENT CONSISTS
OF THO UNREVETTÉO PROBABLE CANVAS COVERED LAUNCHERS
APPROXIMATELY I75 FEET APART AND ORIENTED 254 DEGREES
AND 228 DEGREES RESPECTIVELY, TWO PROBABLE VANS, SEVEN
CANVAS COVERED TRAILER-TYPE VANS TWO OF WHTCH ARE
PROBABLY ELECTRONIC ASSOCIATED, ALL OF THE ABOVE
MENTIONED EQUIPMENT IS INTER-CONNECTED BY CABLE. ALSO
WITHIN THE AREA ARE SIX CANVAS COVERED MISSILE
TRANSPORTERS, SIX TRAICER VANS, FOUR TRÜCK VANS, FOUR
TENTS
AND SEVEN UNIDENTIFIED PIECES OF EQUIPMENT.
O8211W
---
## Page 104
DocId: 32627026
Page
104
CANANOVA MILITARY ARCA
3108 SITSUM 20 OCT 62 REPORTS
EAST EDGE
OF CANANOVA.
SIX TENTS
AND 2 LONG
STORAGE-TYPE
BUILDINGS.
APPROXIMATELY IO UNIDENTIFIEO VEHICLES 1.000
SOUTH OF
TENTS ON HEST SIDE OF ROAD. NO OTHER
ACTIVITY NOTED.
CU 2838N 87505W
---
## Page 105
DocId: 32627026
Page
105
• 1
CASILOA PORT
CU 2145N 07959H
3078 MCI
62 REPORTS
VESSELS
NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT
IN PORT
AT CASILDA.
IN PORT FACILITTES
SINCE MAR 62•
TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS.
3070 SITSUM 22 MAY GE REPORTS
VESSELS HE NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT
PORT AT CASILDA.
NO CHANGE
IN PORT FACILITTES SINCE Z MAY 62.
TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS.
30BO SITSUM
6 JUN 62 REPORTS
TROOP OR VEHICULAR CONCENTRATIONS NOTED.
NO RAIL TRAFFIC. CASILDA - 28 TANK CARS NEAR
POL AREA. NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT AT PIERS AND
IN HARBOR.
CARGO VESSEL (APPROXIMATELY
350 FTS ON SE COURSE QUISIDE OF HARBOR.
SITSUM 29 JUN &2 REPORTS
VESSELS --
NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT IN
CASTLDA PORT.
NO TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS NOTED.
SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY ACTIVITY OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATION
OBSERVED
IN TRINIDAD.
NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES AT CASILDA PORT SINCE
MARCH 62.
VESSELS
ONE CARGO VESSEL AT QUAY.
3483 SITSUM 29 AUG S2 REPORTS
205 NM SOUTH OF TRINIDAO.
VESSEL DESERVEO OFF-LOADING
MATERIEL.
VENICLES/EQUIPHENT --S TANKS, IS TANKS OR
SP GUNS, 16 UNIDENTIFIEO VEHICLES, AND
APPROXIMATELY 28 TRUCKS IN IMMEDIATE
VICINITY OF WHARF. APPROXIMATELY 10
UNIDENTIFIEO PIECES OF EQUIPMENT ON LARGE
CARGO VESSEL AT PIER.
---
## Page 106
DocId: 32627026
Page
106
CHANDAS SAM SITE
CU 2213N
7 OCT 1962 REPORTS LOCATED 2 NA NE OF CHAMBAS
AT 22-13-20N7078-53-30W AND 12 NU SSW OF PUNTA ALEGRE.
SITE TS NOT REVETTED. EQUIPMENT OBSERVED - 6 LAUNCHERS
PROB CANVAS COVERED, POSS FRUIT SET RADAR AND Y VANS
IN CENTRAL GUIDANCE AREA, 4 POSS MISSILE TRANSPORTERS,
APPROX TO
TADDITIONAL VEHICLES, APPROX IN TENTS, SITE
CONFIGURATION NOT DISCERNIBLE.
67853H
---
## Page 107
DocId: 32627026
Page
107
CHAPARRA SAM SITE
CU
2107N 57626N
SAM SITE IS LOCATED 3.2 NM SE OF CHAPARRA.
3493 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS 3. 2 NM SE OF
CHAPARRA
AT 21-117-20N 976-26-20H- SIX LAUNCH POSITIONS
NOTED, STAR CONFIGURATION. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
_SITSUM Y OCT 62 REPORTS
SA-2 SAM SITE, FIRST REPORTED IN LATE SEP 021 IS
UNREVEITEO AND CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES
EQUIPMENT
6 PROBABLE CANVAS-COVEREO. MISSILE
LAUNCHERS, POSSIBLE FRUIT SET RADAR AND 5 VEHICLES IN
CENTRAL
GUIDANCE AREA, POSSILE SPOONREST RADAR AND 2
ASSOCIATEO VEHICLES,
TENTS,
7 POSSIBLE TENTS, AND
PPROXIMATELY ZO ADOITIONAL VEHICLES.
---
## Page 108
DooId: 32627026
Page
108
•CIEGO DE AVILA, SAM ASSEMBLY AREA
CU
2152N
878441
CUBAN REFUGEE REPORTED SEEING CONVOY OF
SOVIET
VEHICLES TURN IN AT FINCA JULIA, LOCATED 7
KH NOKTH OF
CIEGO DE AVILA AT GRID Q0295248. APPROXIMATELY LINDA
SOVIETS REPORTED THERE• CUBANS REPORTEOLY EXCLUDEO.
RUMORS CIRCULATING
. AMONG RESIDENTS THAT
MISSILE
WAS LOCATED ABOUT IT KM NORTH OF CIEGO DE AVILA.
DATE OF INFO.
OCT 62
3498 SITSUM 5. OCT
62 REPORTS
NM NE OF CIEGO DE
AVILA AT 21-52-00N
078-44-07W•
BIVOUAC AREA CONTAINING 15 LARGE TENTS,
APPROXIMATELY 25 SMALL TENTSO ANO
APPROXINATELY 45 VEHICLES ANO PIECES OF
CQUIPHENT.
INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
---
## Page 109
DocId: 32627026
Page
109
a l
CIENFUEGOS PORT FACILITIES
CU
2209N 08027W
G- 3078,
2 MAY 62 REPORTS.:
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN
FACILITIES SINCE MISSION 3850, 3 SEP
61. ONE SMALL
FREIGHTER AT LONG T-SHAPE PIER NEXT TO PUNTA VERDE
2 LARGE FREIGHTERS OFF
PUNTA MAJAGUA. NUMEROUS SMALL
CRAFT THROUGHOUT HARDOR. NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION..
VESSELS
-- ONE
TANKER, 4 CARGO VESSELS, 6 COASTAL FREIGHTERS, 18
BARGES, LIGHTERS,
AND LAUNCHES, 6 SMALL PATROL BOATS,
AND NUMEROUS
SMALL CRAFT.
22 MAY 62 REPORTS.
FACILITILS
6-30794 SINCE 2 MAY 62• VESSELS -- ONE CARGO
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN
VESSEL
ANCHORED WEST OF PUNTA CORDA. INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
6-30800.
6 JUN 62 REPORTS. VESSELS -- ONE CARGO
VESSEL (S0O FTI, CARGO VESSEL (415 FID
CARGO VESSEL
1200 FTl.
ALONGSIDE PIERS AT PUNTA VEROE. ONE
CARGO VESSEL
(415 FT) ALONGSIDE QUAY NORTH END
ENSENADA MARSILLAN, NUMEROUS.
SMALL CRAFT. NO
APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES
INCLUDE LARGE QUANTITY OF 25-FT CRATES AND
SINCE NAY 620 VLENSERSS
IN ENSENADA MARSILLAN.
G- 3082, 18 JUN 62
REPORTS.
SINCE MAY
620
VESSELS REPOR SARGOO CHANGS TANKER ANDIES
COASTAL TANKER.
6-30871.
• 29 JUN 62 REPORTS. VESSELS -- 3 CARGO
ONE PATROL
CRAFT, 4 PT BOATSO AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT.
---
## Page 110
DocId: 32627026
Page
110
G-3095. 12 JUL
62 REPORTS.
VESSELS -- ONE TANKER
AT PIPELINE PIER. ONE FREIGHTER AT RAIL PIER:
FREIGHTERS AT T-HEAD PIER ON SOUTH SIDE. 2 KRONSHTADT-
CLASS. 4 PT
BOATS, AND ONE POSSIBLE GUNBOAT AT CAYO
LOCO.
ONE PT BOAT ON SOUTH SIDE OF PENINSULA. ONE
POSSIBLE PI BOAT ON MARINE RAILWAY. ONE U/I BOAT AT
LAST END OF SOUTH SIDE OF PENINSULA. NUMEROUS BARGES
AND SMALL CRAFT IN HARBOR. MATERIAL STORED IN OPEN
AT CAYO LOCO.
SITSUM 5
i AUG 62 REPORTS
VESSELS
ONE 514-FT FREIGHTER OFFLOADING
UNTO BARGES. ONE 485-FT FREICHTER MOVING
INTO DOCK AREA. ONE 440-FT FREIGHTER ALONG
SIDE OF T-HEAD PIER. 2 FREIGHTERS
AND 520 FTS AT RAIL
PIER. 4 PT GOATS,
ONE POSSIBLE GUNBOAT. 2 PATROL GRAFT.
NUMEROUS BARGES
_AND SMALL CRAFT IN MARBOR.
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE
MAY 62.
RAIL CARS -- 12 BOXCARS ON DOCK,
24 BOXCARS
ON SIDINGS AT
END OF
DOCK• APPROXIMATELY 190
FREIGHT CARS IN RAILYARO.
6-3288%.
29 AUG 62 REPORTS.
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN PORT FACILITIES SINCE JUL 62•
VESSELS -- 3 FREIGHTERS OFF-LOADING AT
TORRIENTE PIER AND DONESTEVEZ WHARF
(ENSENADA MARSILLAND, ONE FREIGHTER AT
ANCHOR IN GAMIA DE CIENFUEGOS, 4 PT BOATS
AND ONE KRONSITADI-CLASS PO AT NAVAL DASE.
30B9 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS
VESSELS
-- 3 FREIGHIERS AT TORRIENTE PIER
AND DONERTEVEY WHARF• ONE FRETCHTER
RAILROAD PIER.
INCOAPLETE INFORMATION.
---
## Page 111
DocId: 32627026
Page
111
* 1
CTENFUEGOS SAM SITE
G-3088, 29
AUG 62 REPORTS •
SSE OF CIENFUEGOS AT 22-02-50N
800-24-26W.
SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SIX
UNREVETTEO LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH AT LEAST S
LAÜNCHERS EMPLACED, ONE OF WHICH IS POSSIBLY
NET-COVERED. GUIDANCE RADAR AND 4 ASSOCIATED
VANS LOCATED IN CENTER OF SITE. CABLE SCARS
NOTED LEADING FROM THE GUIDANCE AREA TO AT
LEAST 4 OF THE LAUNCH POSITIONS. THREE
PROBADLE MISSILE TRANSPORTERS ARE T
PRESENT.
CU
2202N 080247
---
## Page 112
DocId
32627026
Page
112
COLONEL MARTIN MARRERKO AIRFIELO
3078 MCI
• 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO CHÄNGE SINCE MISSION 3445.
23 APR 611 EXCEPT THAT NE/SW RUNWAY IS
UNDERGOING
REPAIR AND IS BEING REGRADED:
NOT SERVICEABLE AT TIME OF PHOTOGRAPHY.
BURGRAS PROGNONE NOT SERVICEABLE BECAUSE
OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PROBABLY RUNWAY
IMPROVEMENT I•
NO OTHER APPARENT CHANGE
SINCE FEB
NUMEROUS
TRENCHES AND FIRING POSITIONS
AROUND AIRFIELD.
30U8 SITSUN
6 JUN 6Z REPORTS
AIRCRÄFT -- NONE.
APPARENT CHANGE TO DEFENSES OR FACILITIES
SINCE MAY G2. RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING.
NOT SERVICEABLE.
3095 SITSUM 29 SEP ÜZ REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE•
NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE JUN 62. RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION
CONTINUINGO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SCATTERED
THROUGHOUT AREA.
3101 SITSUM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- NONE.
CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING ON RUNWAYS. GRADING HAS
PROGRESSEO FOR APPROXIMATELY 5,206 FT ON NH RUNWAY.
UNWAYS PROBABLY UNSERVICEABLE. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
CU 2158N
08247W
---
## Page 113
DocId: 32627026
Page
113
CONDADO AREA, PROBABLE MILITARY INSTALLATION
3078 MCT.
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
ONE NA SW OF CONDADO.
NINE BARRACKS APPROXIMATELY I28 BY 25 FT,
ONE BUILDING
120 BY 75 FT, FIVE MISCELLANEOUS
SMALLER BUILDINGS.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT
24 TRUCKS, 3 JEEPS.
AIRCRAFT -- ONE HOUND.
AIRCRAFT =-
ONE HOUND.
I2 BUILDINGS, APPROXIMATELY 120 BY 29 FT, AND
SMALLER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS. NO
DEFENSES NOTED.
CU 2152N A7951W
---
## Page 114
DocId: 32627026
Page
114
CUATRO CAMINOS AREA, MILITARY TRAINING AREA
3060 SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS
& LÄRGE AND NUMEROUS SMALL BUILDINGS, 10
UNOCCUPIED WEAPONS EMPLACEMENTS.
ONE FLAT
BEO TRUCK, O.
CAMOUFLAGED VEHICLES IN
REVETMENTS,
AND EXTENSIVE TRACK ACTIVITY
AT 28-06-30N 075-33-201.
CU
2007N 07533W
---
## Page 115
DocId: 32627026
Page
115
CUEVAS DEL PEPU, REPORTED MISSILE ACTIVITY
CU
3065 SITSUH
2 FEU O2 REPORTS
NO
MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED.
3071 MCI 15 MAR.
62 REPORTS
NO
MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED.
3074 SITSUM I APR OZ REPORTS
MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED.
INCOMPLETE REPORT.
3HBA SITSUM
6 JUN G2 REPORTS
APPARENT CHANGE IN AREA DEFENSES.
UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OBSERVED.
329L SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS
MISSILE OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED.
3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MISSILE OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTEO.
3085 SITSUM 12 JUL
62 REPORTS
MILITARY OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTEO.
2022N
97622N
---
## Page 116
DocId: 32627026
Page
116
DOS
CAMINOS
AREA, MILITARY TRAINING AREA
CU
ZBI1N
075494
SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS
APPROXIMAIELY 4S FA POSITIONS, 2 AW
POSITIONS, ONE MORTAR POSITION.
NUMEROUS
TRENCHES AND PERSONNEL EMPLACEMENTS LOCATED
20-10-45N 475-48-401.
---
## Page 117
DocId: 32627026
Page
117
EL CRISTO AREA, MILITARY TRAINING AREA
3045 MOI 23 APR 61 REPORTS
205 NA NH OF EL CRISTO.
12 PROBABLY OCCUPIED AUTOMATIC WEAPONS
POSITIONS LOCATEO ON
" SIDE OF ROUTE 6-53.
3OGH SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS
NUMEROUS TRENCHES, FA EMPLACEMENTS AND
TRAINING SCARS AT 20-08-28N
48-810410
SITSUM
6 DEC 61 REPORTS
APPROXIMATELY 45 UNOCCUPILO FA POSITIONS.
NUMEROUS TRENCHES, PERSONNEL EMPLACEMENTS
AND VEHICLE TRACK ACTIVITY.
SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS
APPARENT CHANGES NOTED SINCE
HAY 02.
CU 2009N 07548H
---
## Page 118
DocId: 32627026
Page
118
EL CRISTO AREA, ARMOR TRAINING AREA
3062 SITSUM 19 JAN 62. REPORTS
LOCATED
I MILE EAST OF EL CRISTO.
COVERS APPROX 8U ACRES AND IS PARTIALLY
FENCED. 2 PROBABLE SUPPORT BUILDINGS,
PROBABLE
TENTS AND 3.
SMALL TRENCHES •
VEHICLES
5 HEAVY TANKSO
2 PROBABLE
TANKS,
POSSIBLE TANK, Z CARGO VEHICLES.
CU
2407N
875446
---
## Page 119
DocId: 32627026
Page
119
-I CRISTO AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION
CU.
2008N 87547W
MCI 2 MAY 62
NH NH OF
• REPORTS
EL CKISTO.
ENCOMPASSING
NM ON EAST 510E..
AND ABOUT 2.5
AREA TO WEST CONTAINS AT
LEAST 3U OISPERSED SINGLE-STORY, GABLE-ROOFED
QUILDINGS• ARFA ALSO CONTAINS NUMEROUS FA
POSITIONS, TRENCH SYSTEMSI AND VEMICLE
REVETMENTS• ONE FA POSITION AND ONE NORTAR
POSITION OCCUPIED. EXTENSIVE AREA OF TRACKED
VEHICLE SCARRING. SEVERAL AH POSITIONS AND 18
GARAGE-TYPE BUILDINGS NEAR TRACKED AREA JUST
WEST OF TRENCHES..
POSSIBLE HO AREA LOCATED 2.3
PIM NORTH OF TRAINING AREA SECURED BY FENCE AND
SEVERAL TRENCHES.
---
## Page 120
DocId: 32627026
Page
121
EL CRISTO, MILITARY INSTALLATION
CU
2007N
875461
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
IN FORTIFICATIONS SINCE 2 MAY 62.
VEHICLES OR TROOP CONCENTRATION DOSERVEU.
3480 SITSUM
6 JUN 62 REPORTS
APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MAY 62.
CONCENTRATION OF TROOPS OR EQUIPMENT NOTED:
3681 SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS
1 APPARENT CHANGES NOTED SINCE MAY 62.
3483 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MAY 62r
EXCEPT ONE VEHICLE EMPLACEMENY
OCCUPIED.
ONE OTHER VEHICLE PARKED IN AREA.
3085 SITSUN 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
MILITARY OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY
NOTED.
NO CHANGE
IN DEFENSES (UNOCCUPIED SINCE
HAY 620
3086 SITSUM
• 5 AUG 62 REPORIS
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
31188 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
SIX FA PIECES IN TRAINING AREA 2
NM NW OF
EL CRISTO.
NO OTHER SIGNIFICANT CHANGES NOTED SINCE
JUL 020
---
## Page 121
DocId:32627026
Page
121
EL CRISTO, SUSPECT MISSILE AREA
UNDER GROUND CONSTRUCTION.
3093 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS NO UNDERGROUND
CONSTRUCTION SITES OR
MISSILE-RELATED ACTIVITY NOTEO.
CU
- 2007N
875444
---
## Page 122
DocId: 32627026
Page
122
•I ESPERALDA SAM SITE
CU
3IAD, TOCT 1962 REPORTS LOCATED 6 NA NA OF
ESMERALDA AT 21-55-48N/078-13-18W.
SA-Z SAM SITE,
UNREVETTEO, CONTAINING THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES AND
LOUIPMENT
- & EMPLACED LAUNCHERS PROBAULY CANVAS
COVEREDO PROBAGLE FRUIT SET RADAR ANO 6 ASSOCIATED VANS
IN GUIDANCE AREA, A POSSIBLE ACQUISITION RADAR
• CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE
TRANSPORTERS
PROBABLE
EMPLACED, RANSPORTER, S LARGE AND 6 SMALL TENTS AND AT
LEAST IS OTHER VEMICLES.
2155N 87013W
---
## Page 123
DocId:
326
706
raue
123
GUANAJAY AREA, MILITARY CAMP
3070
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
2.1, NAME OF GUANAJAY•
CAMP CONTAINS 2 SUPPURT/BARRACKS BUILDINGS,
« ASSOCIATEO BUILDINGS, AT LEAST 25 TENTS,
I VEHICLES.
DEFENSES -- ONE G-GUN UNOCCUPIEO FA
POSITION • NH TO THE EAST AND ONE G-GUN
UNOCCUPTED FA POSITION 1.I NM TO THE EASTA
G-GUN UNOCCUPTEC FA POSITION 2.2 NH
NORTH OF GUANAJAY, ONE &-GUN UNOCCUPIED FA
POSITION 2OT NH NORTH OF GUANAJAY, ONE 6-GUN
UNOCCUPIED FA POSITION I.4 N# NORTH OF
GUANAJAY,
4-GUN UNOCCUPTED FA POSITION,
POSITIONS
WNW OF GUANAJAY.
---
## Page 124
DocId: 32627026
Page
124
GUANTANAMO
AREA, MILITARY BARRACKS AND STORAGE
• 3049 I5 JUNE GI REPORTS
REPORTEO
25-06-35N 075-04-32H.
i2 DWELLINGS, I
B BARNS, ONE STORAGE- TYPE
BUILDING, ONE STORAGE-TYPE
BUILDING IN
FENCED AREA, AND NUMEROUS SMALL
ASSOCIATED QUILDINGS.
CU
200 4N
07504W
---
## Page 125
DocId: 32627026
Page
125
JIGUANI AREA, SAM SITE
CU 2021N
076201
SAM EQUIPMENT, LOCATEO 504 NA ESE OF JIGUANI,
INCLUDES
6 CANVAS-COVEREO
MISSILE TRANSPORTERS,
MISSILE LAUNCHERS, AND
15 VEHICLES.
3093 SITSÜM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS 5.4 NM ESE OF
JIGUANT AT 2P-21-GUN 875-20-0A%
SAM EQUIPMENT
EMPLACED)
IN OPEN FIELDS INCLUDES S CANVAS-COVERED
TRANSPORTERS, & MISSILE-LAUNCHERS,
VEHICLES,
AND 5 PIECES OF EQUIPMENT. THREE LARGE AND
SMALL
TENTS ALSO NOTED.
3098
SITSUM 5 OCT 62 REPORTS
5044.
ESE OF JIGUANI AT 2W-21-MON
176-28-08W.
PROBABLE SA-2
SAM SITE WITH CIRCULAR ROAD
PATTERN AND " POSSIBLE LAUNCHERS.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
.... ..
---
## Page 126
DocId: 32627026
Page
126
JUCARDR
SUSPECT
MISSILE AREA
CU
2137N
CUBAN REFUGEE SOURCE REPORTED THAT IN MID-AUGUST A
208-MAN SCUIET
ENCAMPMENT WAS OBSERVEO NORTH OF TOWN
AT GAID QP2259539 ENCAMPHENT HAD TENTS, UPEN STORAGE OF
CRATES, SEVERAL TRUCKS. NO SECURITY MEASURES, WEAPONS
APPARENT• INTERCEPTEO INTERNAL MESSAGES OF LATE
SEPTEMBER AND EARLY OCTOBER REVEAL PRESENCE OF SOVIETS
IN JUCARO AREA.
3A98 SITSUM S OCT 62 REPORTS
NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED WITHIN A IU-NM RADIUS OF
JUCARO.
87851W
---
## Page 127
DooId: 32627026
Page
127
HAVANA.
AAA DEFENSES
IPIR 9617-5030 27 OCT 62 REPORTS
9.3 NM EAST OF CAMPO LIBERTAD
AIRFIELD AT
23-05-34N 882-16-50W.
SIX-GUN OCCUPIED, PRODABLY 57-MM. MEDIUM AAA BATTERY
WITH FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT.
GUNS ARE
MANNED, CABLES:
LEAD FROM EACH BATTERY TO CONTROL EQUIPMENT:
LARGE PERSONNEL
TENTS, Z BUILDINGS.
CU 2385N 88216W
---
## Page 128
DocId:32627026
Page
178
*I MAVANA,
3078 NCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
SUOMARINES -- NONE OOSERVED•
SURFACE COMBATANTS
-- ONE PF
AND 2 PT BOATS
CUBAN NAVAL SHIPYARD ICASA BLANCADO
AUXILIARY/HERCHANT -- 23 FREIGHTERS,
TANKER, & SMALL FREIGHTERS, AND NUMEROUS
SMALL
CRAFT THROUGHOUT THE MARBOR.
NUMEROUS CRATES
OUSERVED AT VARIOUS PIERS AND
WHARVES.
APPROXIMATELY LOU RAIL CARS (ROXCARS, TANK
CARS, AND FLAT CARSI DUSERVED ADJACENT TO
HARBOR AREA.
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
SURFACE COMBATANTS -- ONE PF AND ONE
AUXILIARY VESSEL AT PAULA PIER NO 2, 4 PT
AND 2 SMALL PATROL CRAFT AT NAVAL SHIPYARO.
AUXILIARY/MERCHANT -- ZB FREIGHTERS, ONE
TANKERO D SHALL FREIGHTERS, AND NUMEROUS
SHALL CRAFT THROUCHOUT HARBOR-
LOGISTICS/MATERIAL -- ONE FREIGHTER CARRYING
TEN 30-40 FT LONG PACKING CRATES ON DECK.
3080 SIT SUM
• JUN. 02 REPORIS
VESSELS
- 1E LARGE FREIGHTERSO 2 SMALL
COASTAL FREIGHTERS, ONE SMALL TANKER, ONE
BARGE, 3 PATROL CRAFTO 2
FRIGATES.
3 PT BOATS, AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT
THOUGHOUT HARBOR.
SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
VESSELS
- 29 LARGE AND
SMALL.
CARGO,
2 TANKERSO 4 PI COATSO AND NUMEROUS
SMALL CRAFT
IN HARBOR.
NO APPARENT CONCENTRATIONS OR STOCKPILING
NOTED.
CU
2308N
08221W
---
## Page 129
DocId: 32627026
rade
129
3084 SITSUM
a JUL 62 REPORTS
AT LEAST 15 CARGO SHIPS.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3885 SITSUM 12 JUL 02 REPORTS
VESSELS -- 2 PATROL FRIGATES, 2 PATROL CRAFT.
ONE POSSIBLE PATROL CRAFI, 3 PT BOATSE 20
FREIGHTERS, AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT.
NO APPARENT
CONCENTRATIONS OR STOCKPILING
NOTED IN HARBOR AREA.
3A06 SITSUM
5 AUG 62 REPORTS
VESSELS -- 11 SURFACE COMBATANTS,
INCLUDING
3 PATROL
FRIGATESe 4 PATROL
CRAFT, ONE POSSIBLE PATROL CRAFTe
3 PT BOATS. 20 FREIGHTERS, AND NUMEROUS
SMALLER VESSELS.
NO STOCKPILING OR CONCENTRATIONS NOTED.
3098 SITSUA 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
VESSELS - A TOTAL OF 35 CARGO/TANKERS, 3
EX-US-PF.
? PT BOATS AND 3 PC AS FOLLOWS -=
ONE FREICHTER AT COAL
LiHARF NO 20 THO
LIGHTERS AND 3 UNIDENTIFIEO VESSELS AT GAMIZ
CYLINORICAL TANK CARS ON DECK AND ONE
LIGHTER AT ESSO PIER. ONE FREIGHTER AT
COIFICIO QUAY NO L. ONE FREIGHTER AT REGLA
PIER 34.
GNE FREIGHTER AT GEGUIRISTAIN
KHARF• FIVE FREIGHTERS AND ONE TÄNKER AT
CAYO CRUZ• ONE COASTAL FREIGHTER AT POTE
GUAY. ONE FREIGHTER AT ATARES FRUIT WHARF
AND ONE AT VACCARO WHARF. THREE EREIGHTERS
AT WAND LINE PIER AND WHARF...
TWO SMALL
FREIGHTERS AT UNITED FRUIT COMPANY PIER AND
WHARF. ONE FREIGHTER AT HAVANA CENTRAL PIER.
SMALL FREIGHTER AT PAULA PIER NO 3.
THREE US PF-TYPE VESSELS AT PAULA PIER NO 1.
ONE FREICHTER AT SANTA CLARA PIER. ONE
FREIGHTER AT MACHINA PIER.
ONE FREIGHTER
---
## Page 130
DocId: 32627026
Page
130
.. MAVANA SAM SITE
G- 3088, 29
2 AUG 62 REPORTS.
6.7 NM ENE OF
- HAVANA AT 23-89-25N
982-13-324.
SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
UNPEVETTIO LAUNCH POSITIONS.
LAUNCHERS:
FRUIT SET RADAR WITH APPROXIMATELY 6
ASSOCIATED VANS, 6 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS
WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERS, APPROXIMATELY
L0 VEHIGLESe AND APPROXIMATELY 15 TENTS.
CU
23H9N 002131
---
## Page 131
DocId: 32627026
Pade
131
HAVANA,
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREA
ADJACENT
TO RAIL
YARD, JUST
SOUTH OF
HAVANA HARBOR. OPEN STORAGE AREA
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 150 TRUCKS AND
APPROXIMATELY 1,300 U/1 VEHICLES AND/OR
PIECES OF EQUIPMENT• APPROXIMATELY 88
SQUARE SHIPPING CRATES.
3458 &C1
3 SEP O1 REPORTS
ADJACENT TO RAIL YARD, JUST SOUTH OF
HAVANA HARBOR. OPEN STORAGE AREA
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 158 TRUCKS AND
APPROXIMATELY 1,300 U/I VEHICLES AND/OR
PIECES OF EQUIPMENT.
3068 SITSUM 26 OCT OI REPORTS
ADJACENT TO RAIL VARD, JUST SOUTH OF
HAVANA HARBOR. OPEN STORAGE AREA
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY S0 TRUCKS AND
156 UNTOENTIFIED VEHICLES AND/OR PIECES
OF EQUIPMENT.
3461 SITSUM
& DEC 61 REPORTS
ADJACENT TO RAIL YARD, JUST SOUTH OF
HAVANA HARBOR: OPEN STORAGE AREA CONTAINING
150 PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, AND 1O BUSSES.
3A88 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
AREA ADJACENT TO RAILYARO SOUTH OF HAVANA
HARBOR. TOTAL OF 439 VEHICLES, INCLUDING
LARGE TRUCKS, 305 MEDIUM TRÜCKS, 31 JEEPS,
2 LOW BOYS, 12 BUSES AND 11 VEHICLES OF
UNDETERMINED TYPE.
CU. 2307N
08221W
---
## Page 132
DocId: 32627026
Page
132
HAVANA.
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT PARK
3&B0 SITSUM
& JUN &Z REPORTS
SW OUTSKIRTS OF HAVANA, AND SW EDGE UF
MARIANAO.
LARGE VEHIGLE EQUIPMENT PARK CONTAINING
SEVERAL HUNDREO VEHICLES AND PIECES OF
UNIDENTIFIED EGUIPMENT. MAJORITY OF
VEHICLES APPEAR TO BE SMALL TRÜCKS AND JEEPS.
8 POSSIBLE MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS AND OTHER
MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS.
CU 2303N
88227W
---
## Page 133
DocId: 32627026
Page
133
HAV
ANA-
AREA
AAA
DEFENSES
&I REPORTS
OCCUPIED AAA
• SITE AT
+3-84-158 682-29-869to
VEHICLES,
TENTS IN AREA.
OCT EL REPORTS
MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIED ANA SITE AT
23-04-15N 082-74-00W.
SIX VEHICLES.
IN AREA.
6 DEC 61 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM E-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-14-15N 082-20-130n°
7 VEHICLES,
TENTS
IN AREA.
CU
2304N
88228W
---
## Page 134
DocId: 32627026
Page
134
MAVANA AREA ANA DEFENSES
3058 MCL 3 SEP O1 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-03-25N 482-17-15W•
ENPLACEMENT, 4 PERSONNEL TENTS AND
3 VEHICLE REVETMENTS.
3UGÜ SITSUM 26 OCT GI REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM &-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-48-25N 082-17-15W.
FCC EMPLACEMENT,
4 PERSONNEL TENTS, 3
VEHICLE REVETNENIS AND & VEHICLES OBSERVEO.
3UGL SITSUH
6 DEC GL REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM A-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-08-25N 082-17-15W0 FCC EMPLACEMENT,
PERSONNEL TENTS,
3 VEHICLE REVETMENTS AND
VEHICLES.
CU
---
## Page 135
DocId: 326
27026
Page
135
HAVANA
• AREA DAA DEFENSES
3058 MCI 3 SEP 61 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUN O-GUN OCCUPIED MAA SITE
AT 23-86-ZQN 882-17-351.
SIX TENTS, 4 VEHICLES, 2 SMALL
BUILDINGS IN AREA.
3:GH SITSUM 26 OCT GI REPORTS
ONE MEDIU: G-GUN OCCUPIEO AAA
_SITE AT
23-16-20N 062-17-35h. SIX TENTS: 4
VEHICLES, Z SMALL BUILDINGS IN AREA.
3HOL SITSUM 6 DEG GL REPORIS
ONE MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-46-22N 032-17-35H0 4 TENTSe 4 VEHICLESe
2 SMALL BUILDINGS IN ARFA.
CU 2306N
182184
---
## Page 136
DocId: 32627026
Page
136
HAVANA
AREA
AAA
DEFENSES
3058 KC1
3 SEP &1 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM 6-GUN OCCUPIEO AAA SITE AT
23-04-00N 682-27-25H. ALL EMPLACEMENTS
COVEREO BY NETTING. I VEMICLES
PARKLO
IN AREA.
3U61 SITSUM
& DEC 61 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM G-GUN UCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-24-00N 002-27-25N. ALL EMPLACEMENTS
COVERED BY NETTINGO & VEHICLES.
CU
---
## Page 137
DooId: 32627026
Page
137
HAVANA
AREA ANA
DEFENSES
NCI 3 SEP 61 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM E-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-45-36N 482-27-50Wo RADAR CONTROLLED.
VEHICLES IN AREA.
3961.
6 DEC OL REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM 6-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-25-30N 082-27-50W0 PADAR CONTROLLED.
12 VEHICLES.
CU
2366N
08228W
---
## Page 138
DocId: 32627026
Page
138
HAVANA AREA
AAA
DEFENSES
3458 MCI
3 SEP 61 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AI
23-03-35N
882-25-05H. FOUR TANKS AND
LA VEHICLES
IN AREA.
6 DEC 61 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM &-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-43-35N
602-25-45M• 8 VEHICLES, AND
CÜ 2304N 00225W
---
## Page 139
Do01d: 32627026
Page
139
HAVANA AREA AAA DEFENSES:
3058 MCI 3 SEP 61 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM 6-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT
23-04-15N 882-22-15W°
EICHI
VEMICLES, 4 TENTS IN AREA:O
SITSUM 26: 0CT. 01. REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIEU AAA
SITE:AT.
23-04-151 002-22- 15W•
NING VEHICLES, 4 TENTS IN AREA•
3061 SITSUM 6 DEC 61 REPORTS
ONE MEDIUM &-GUN OCCUPTED AAA SITE AT
23-06- 15N
• 082-22-15W• NINE VEHICLES,
4 TENTS: IN
AREA.
CU: 2304N
08222W
---
## Page 140
DocId: 32627026
Page
140
HAVANA AREA, MILITARY CAMP
• 3062 SITSUM 19 JAN 62 REPORTS
A ROAD-SERVED, PARTIALLY FENCED MILITARY CAMP
LOCATED O NM SE OF HAVANA AND 3 NM NNW OF
MANAGUA, COVERS APPROX 6D ACRES, BARRÄCKS...
FACILITIES IN THE AREA ARE CAPABLE OF HOUSING
APPROX 175 MEN.
THE AREA CONTAINS THREE BARRACKS: ONE PROBABLE
BARRACKS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, ONE ADMIN
BUILDING, TWO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS,
FIVE STORAGE
BUILDINGS, ONE BARN, ONE ANTI-
AIRCRAFT ARTILLERY EMPLACEMENT 15 FEET IN
DIAMETER, AND TWO EXCAVATIONS. SEVEN PRIME
MOVERS,
20 WHEELED VEHICLES, AND & CAMOUFLAGE
NETS COVERING UNIDENTIFIED EQUIPMENT ARE
VISTOLE IN THE AREA. A SMALL LOCAL
TRAINING
AREA IMMEDIATELY SW OF THE MILITARY CAMP
CONTAINS RECENTLY DUG TRENCHES AND FOXHOLES.
TWO CAMOUFLAGED 3-GUN LIGHT ANTIAIRCRAFT:
ARTILLERY SITES (PROBABLY OCCUPIED) WITH
EMPLACEMENTS: 15 FEET IN DIAMETER ARE LOCATED
1, 500 FEET SOUTH OF THE CAMP. THREE OTHER...
BUILDINGS ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE
- VICINITY DE
THE ANTIAIRCRAFT
ARTILLERY SITES.
CU.
2380N 08218W
---
## Page 141
DocId: 32627026
Page
141
HAVANA
HAN CAL
AMMO STORAGE
3007 SITSUM 21 FEB 62 REPORTS
FENCED AREA CONT
• AT LEAST TWO
CARTH-COVERED DRIVE-THOUGH BUILDINGS
WITH INTERCONNECTING ROAD. CONSTRUCTION
IS CONTINUING
IN THE AREA.
TAL: 3067: 8/311.
-: L/305. CLEAR:
250-F502-1F-17-6
50- E723-SHEET-3785-1115
CU
2304N3 08219W
---
## Page 142
DocId: 32627026
Pag
142
HAVANA AREA, COASTAL DEFENSES
:3036
2.5 NM EAST OF MORRO CASTLE, HAVANA.
L.5 NM STRETCH OF BEACH: CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 35 GUN POSITIONS, 10: OF
WHICH ARE
POSSIBLY OCCUPIE0.
(INCOMPLETE INFORMATION)
3058| MCI 3: SEP GI REPORTS
EAST OF MORRO CASTLE, HAVANA.
NM STRETCH OF BEACH CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 35 GUN POSITIONS:
CU
---
## Page 143
DooId: 32627026
Page
143
HAVANA AREA, MILITARY DEFENSES
3429
4.2 NM SW OF MORRO CASTLES ON LOMA
DE HUSILLO. ONE UNOCCUPIED &-GUN MEDIUM
AA POSITION, 20 OCCUPIED LIGHT AA
POSITIONS: THREE 4-GUN, ONE 5-GUNI ONE
7-GUN. AND THREE POSSIBLE 3-GUN MEDIUM
DP POSITIONS AND NUMEROUS LIGHT ARTILLERY
POSITIONS, ALL UNOCCUPIED ON THE HIGH
GROUND OF THE LOMA DE HUSILLO.
3058 MCD 3 SEP 61 REPORTS
402 NM SH OF MORRO CASTLE: ON LOMA
DE HUSILLO: ONE UNOCCUPIED 6-GUN MEDIUM
AA POSITIONA 20 OCCUPIED LIGHT AA
POSITIONS:
THREE 4-GUN. ONE 5-GUN, ONE
7-GUN• AND THREE POSSIBLE 3-GUN MEDIUM:
DP POSITIONS AND NUMEROUS LIGHT ARTILLERY
POSITIONS, ALL UNOCCUPIED, ON THE MIGH
GROUND OF THE LOMA DE HUSILLO.
EU:
230GN 08224W
---
## Page 144
DocId
326
27026
Lace
144.
HAVANA AREA, MILITARY DEFENSES
3445
206 NM EAST OF GUANABACOA ANO 1,509 FT"
NE OF ROUTE 2-19. ONE 5-GUN AND TWO 4-GUN
POSITIONS, PRODABLY OCCUPIED: AND ONE
PROBABLE 3-GUN UNOCCUPIED MEDIUM ARTILLERY
POSITION.
* 3058 MCI, 3 SEP 61 REPORTS
206 NA EAST OF GUANÁBACOA AND 1,500 F1322
NE OF ROUTE 2-190 ONE 5-GUN AND THO 4-GUN:
POSITIONS, PROBABLY OCCUPIED, AND ONE
PROBABLE 3-GUN UNOCCUPIED MEDIUM ARTILLERY
POSITION OBSERVED.
---
## Page 145
DocId: 32627026.
Page
145
HOLGUIN AIRFIELO
CU 2049N 07610W
G-3078,
2 NAY 62 REPORTSO RUNWAY APPROXINATELY 8S
PERCENT BLACK-TOPPED. CONSTRUCTION OF RUNWAY
AND FACILITTES CONTINUES. NO OTHER CHANGE SINCE FISSION
3074, LAPR 62. ARCRAFT =-
NONE. SURFACING OF RUNWAY
AND TAXIWAYS,
AND CONSTRUCTION OF REVETTED PARKING
AREAS CONTINUING. NO
SECURTTY, COMMUNICATIONZELECTRONIG
FACILITIES,
OR WEAPONS STORAGE OBSERVED. INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
+: G- 3079, 22 MAY 62 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT - NONE.
DEFENSES: - TOTAL OF 13 LIGHT ANA EMPLACEMENTS - 9
OCCUPIED AND 4 UNOCCUPIED: NO COMMUNICATIONS OR
CLECTRONICS FACILITIES IN AREA.
6-3080, 6 JUNE 62 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT - ONE CRATEV
AND ONE CESSNA 310. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING
ON RUNWAY, AIRFIELD FACILITIES, AND AIRCRAFT
REVETMENTS•.
RUNWAY PARTIALLY SERVICEABLE. NUMEROUS
EMPLACEMENTS, BOTH OCCUPIED AND UNOCCUPIED
ARDUND PERIMETER OF FIELD.
6-3081, 15 JUNE 62 REPORTS.
RUNWAY COMPLETE AND
SERVICEABLE.
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON
TAXIWAYSe:
AIRCRAFT REVETNENTS AND OTHER SUPPORT
FACILITIES• NUMEROUS LIGHT AA POSITIONS COCCUPIED AND
---
## Page 146
DooId: 32627026
Page
146
ONOCCUPTEDY AROUND PERIMETER OF FIELD.
AIRCRAFT -- NONE INCOMPLLTESINFOSZZ
6-30837 29 JUNE 62 REPORTS.
ATRCRAFT --
RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED, RUNWAY SERVICEABLE.
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON TAXIWAYS NEARING COMPLETION.
NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MID-JUN 62.
G-3085, 12 JULY GZ REPORTS.
AIRCRAFT -- NONE.
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTTON CONTINUING ON
TAXIWAYS, REVETMENTS, AND OTHER SUPPORT FACILITIES.
NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE JUN: 620
3086 SITSUM S AUG 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT E- NONE OBSERVED.
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING
TAXIWAYS, REVETMENTS AND OTHER SUPPORT
FACIL
TIES.
NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE JUL 62•
G-38B80 29 AUG 62 REPORTS.
RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY APPEAR SERVICEALE.
CONSTRUCTION ON FACILITIES CONTINUES:
ATRCRAFT -- NONE.
3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT 2
KUNWAYS SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTION: ON
FACICITIES CONTINUINGO NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES
SINGE JUN 620
3093 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE.
RUNWAY AND TAXINAYS SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTION
CONTINUING ON FACILITIES AND AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS. NEW
NAVIGATIONAL AID UNDER CONSTRUCTION 2 NM SW OF THE SW
END OF THE RUNWAY CONTAINS AREA A CRS-DE BE LOINS,
T-SHAPED BUILDING, AND & SUPPORT-TYPE BUILDINGS.
NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE LATE AUG G20
NO 3100 SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS:
NO APPARENT CHANGE AN EACTUITTES SINGEESER 620
AIRCRAFT --
---
## Page 147
DOCI
26
Page
147
HOLCUIN AREA, MILITARY MOTOR POOL.
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT
16 CARGO TRUCKS,
15 CARGO TRAILERS, 2 BULLDOZERS, ANO
19 UNIDENTIFTEO OBJECTS MEASURING
APPROXIMATELY LO BY 3 FEET.
NO TROUP CONCENTRATION OR DEFENSES IN
IMMEDIATE AREA•
2 3084 SITSUM
6 JUN: 62 REPORTS
LARGE CONCENTRATION OF OPEN STORAGE.
NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MAY 1962.
ONG VEHICLE. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3082 51TSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS
MOTOR POOL-APPROX 25 VEHICLES.
MARRACKS ANO TRATNING AREA, 202 NM WEST-
SOUTHWEST OF HOLGUIN AT 2052N/76171 CONTAINS
6 PROBABLE DARRACKS AND NUMEROUS TRENCHES AND
AW POSITIONS:
NUMEROUS TRENCH: NETWORKS AND AW POSITIONS ARE
LOCATED ON HIGH GROUND SWAN ANO NE UF TOWN.
INCOMPLETE INFO.
3063 SETSUM 29 JÜN 62 REPORTS
MEMICLES =-
2 IN MOTOR POOL PARKING AREA.
GARAGE AREA CONTALNS NUMEROUS CRATES IN
OPEN STORAGE. NO CHANGE IN HARRACKSE OR IN
TRENCHES ENCIRCLING TOWN.
3005
SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
INSTALLATION.:
ON SOUTH EDGE OF HOLGUIN
PREVIOUSLY REPORTED AS A MILITARY MOTOR
POOL IS NOW CONSIDGRED TO BE AN AGRICULTURAO
EQUIPMENT STORAGE FACILITY.
VEHICLES/EGUIPMENT --
APPROXIMATELY 3U
TRÜCKSA
APPROXIMATELY 20: LIGHT TRUCKS OR
TRACTORS, AND NUHEROUS CONTAINERS IN OPEN
STORAGE:
NO CHANGE IN HOLGUIN AREA DEFENSES.
3000 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 2
3088 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
XPPROXTRATELY IOU CONTAINERS IN OPEN
STORAGE. NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED.
VEHICLES -- ABOUT 25G SMALL VEHICLES IN
PARKING AREA.
CU 2052N 07616W
---
## Page 148
DocId: 32627026
Page
148
HOLGUIN AREAS.
MILITARY ENCAMPMENT
3893 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS. 3.8 NM NORTH OF
HOLGUIN
IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF
THE JUNCTION OF ROUTES
G-58 AND 6-53P AT 20-57-00N 976-16-38W. WCODED AREA
CONTATNING PERSONNEL TENTS+
NUMEROUS VEHICLES, ANO
CONSIDERASLE TRACK ACTIVITY. MATERIEL STORED IN OPEN.
CO 2057N 076164
---
## Page 149
DocId
32
7026
Page
149
HOYO DE MANICARAGUA AREA, POSS BARRACKL
AREA VE
# 1 38161
1 NM WSW OF HOYO DE MANICARAGUA.
1L BARRACKS, 3 STORAGE BUILDINGST
3 POSSIBLE STORAGE BUILDINGS, 2
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS, AND 5
SUPPORT BUILDINGS. AREA •S NM
EASTOE.
SITE CONTAINS 2 GROUPS OF BUILDINGS UNDER:
CONSTRUCTION. ONG GROUP HAS 20: BUILDINGS.
THE OTHER GROUP: HAS 12 BUILDINGS AND
FOOTINGS FOR 8 MORE. AREA HAS POSSIBLE:
PARADE GROUND. NO SECURITY MEASURES
OBSERVED.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- NONE VISIGLE:
• 3058 MOT
6I REPORTS
ONE NM WSH OF
HOYO DE MANICARAGUA.
11 BARRACKS, 3 STORAGE BUILDINGS, 3
• POSSIBLE
STORAGE BUILDINGS+
2 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS.
AND G SUPPORT BUILDINGS. AREA •5 NM EAST OF
SITE CONTAINS 2 GROUPS OF BUILDINGS UNDER
CONSTRUCTION• ONE GROUP HAS 21 BUILDINGS.
THE OTHER GROUP-HAS 20 BUILÖINGS. NO SECURITY
MEASURES OBSERVED. APPROXIMATELY 50 ARTILLERY
PIECES ARRANGED IN
ROWS WEST OF THE BARRACKS.
APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FT SOUTH OF BARRACKS AREA
FOOTINGS HAVE BEEN LAID FOR 3 LARGE BUILDINGS.
• 3071 MOL 15 MAR 62 REPORTS
NO CHANGE IN BARRACKS AREA SINCE MISSION
305803 SEP 61. THE 2 AREAS •5 NM EAST OF
BARRACKS NOW APPEAR COMPLETED. 2 LARGE
BUILDINGS SOUTH OF BARRACKS AREA ARE
PARTIALLY COMPLETED. ALL AREAS ROAD SERVED.
ARTILLERY -- NONE OBSERVED.
0 5 3078 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MISSION 3058,
3 SEP GL IN POSSIBLE BARRACKS AREA• NO
ARTILLERY OBSERVED. AREA 0.5 NM EAST OF
POSSIBLE BARRACKS APPEARS TO BE A HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT. AREA: SOUTH OF THE POSSIOLE
BARRACKS AREA APPEARS TO BE AN INDUSTRIALS
COMPLEX UNDER CONSTRUCTION. POSSIBLE
UNDERGROUNO STORAGE AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION
JUST SOUTH OF INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.
CU 220SN 09004W
---
## Page 150
DocId
32
7026
Page
150
=.1
: LA:COLOMA SAM SITE
G- 3088, 29 AUG: 62. REPORTS:
4.5 NM. NNW OF LA COLOMA AT 22-18-42N
883-32-35W-
SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SIX
LAUNCHERS, FRUIT SET RADAR AND 7 VANS-IN
CENTER. 15 TRUCKS, 6 TENTS, 3 MISSILE-HOLD
POSITIONS WITH 2 CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE
TRANSPORTERS IN EACH. 3 HOLD POSITIONS
REVETTED. ONE LAUNCHER AND VANS IN CENTER OF
SITE BEING REVETTED. POSSIBLE ACQUISITION:
RADAR SITE REVETTEO AND NET-COVERED.
3101: SITSOM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS
SIX LAUNCHERS, 3 HOLD POSITIONS, AND GUIDANCE AREA IN:
CENTER, ALL REVETTED. SITE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE COVERED
OR NETTED. ONE UNIDENTIFIED REVETMENT NOTED.
UNIDENTIFIED VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT NOTED IN SUPPORT AREA.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
CU 2218N 083321
---
## Page 151
DooId: 3262
7026
Page
151
SE0E2E
ESPERANZA MARTEL
3078 MOT
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS, EQUIPMENT
OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OBSERVEO IN THE
ESPERANZA-MARIEL AREA.
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY: 62 REPORTS
NO MISSILE OR OTHER UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OBSERVEO.
SITSUM 6: JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OUSERVED.
SITSUM 18 JUN: 62 REPORTS
NO UNUSUAL
MILITARY OR MISSILE ACTIVITY NOTED.
ANCOMPLETE INFO.
SITSUM: 29
JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MISSILE
ACTIVITY OR MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS
NOTGO. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
# 3484 SITSUM 8 JUL 62 REPORTS
NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OR MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS
OBSERVED. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
#: 3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OR UNUSUAL
ACTIVITY NOTED.
3086 SITSUM: 5 AUG 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY ACTIVITY NOTED.
3688 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
SEE BAHIA HONDA SAM SITE.
CU 2301N
18245W
---
## Page 152
DocId: 32627026
Page
152
LA FLORA AREA MIL
¡RY STORAGE
3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
205 NAWSH OF SAN ANTONIO DE LOS EANOS.
AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION, CONTAINING
STORAGE-TYPE BUILDINGS, 3 STORAGE-TYPE
BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION,
AND 32 PROBABLE
DWELLING
UNITS. LOCATED IN WOODED AREA.
NO SECURITY
OR DEFENSES NOTED.
CU
2252N
08233W
---
## Page 153
DocId:
326
7026
Page
153
LA-SIERRA: PROB:LI
TARY: VEHICLE PARK
3069 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS
20.5 NMENE CIF COLON AND 1.5 NMASSE. OF LAM
SIERRA, ATPAN EXISTING PROBABLE AGRICULTURAL
STORAGE. AREA*
CONTAINS 42 LARGE BUTLINGS WITH A VEHICLE
COMPOUND TO THE REAR CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY 300 VEHICLES. APPROXIMATELY: 50
VEHICLES ARE LOCATED: THROUGHOUT THE SUILOING
AREA. AT LEAST L4 CANVAS-COVERED PROBABLE
TANKS. IMMEDIATELY ACROSS THE ROAD FROM THE
BUILOING AREA ARE 5 TENTS ANO APPROXIMATELY.
12 VEHICLES.
CU 2249N 08033W
---
## Page 154
DocId: 32627026
Page
154
ARET
LAS MERCEDES AREAS
BOSI SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY INSTALLATIONS OR ACTIVITY NOTED.
CU 2029N 07633W
---
## Page 155
DocId: 32627026
Page
155
SHANET
CU: 2259N 08121W
SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
SE OF LIMONAR, AT UTM 17QMR 626332
SERIES E7234 SHEET 3984 IVI.
AREA CONTAINS 8 CANVAS-COVERED/CAMOUFLAGED
PROBABLE TANKS, 6 PROBABLE BARRACKS, AND
12 SMALL SUPPORT BUILDINGS. ROAD SERVED.
CONSIDERABLE TRACKEO-VEHICLE TRACK ACTIVITY
IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.
13085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
3.5 NM SE OF LIMONAR.
NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE JUN 628 EXCEPT
GROUND CLEARING NEAR BARRACKS AREA INDICATES
POSSIBLE NEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY•
VENTCLES/EQUIPMENT -- 8 CANVAS-COVERED
TANK SO
---
## Page 156
DocId: 32627026
Page
156
LOMA
ENRA POSS SAM ASSEMOLY AREA
CU:
SITSUM 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
OPEN VEHICLE
STORAGE ARCA WITH AN ACCESS ROAD
IS LOCATEO ME MILES, SE OF HAVANA.
CONTAINS SIX SMALL SHEDS OF WHICH ONE IS
PROBABLY
SENTRY BOX OR SHELTER FOR A CHECKER.
NO VEHICLE PROCESSING OR MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ARE
AREA. PHOTOGRAPHY OF 2. MAY: 1962
400 CARGO TRUCKS AND 100 CARGO TRAILERS.
RAPHY OF
292AUG 1962 REVEADS APPROXIMATELY
VEHICLES OF VARIOUS TYPES.
---
## Page 157
DocId
32627026
Page
157
LOS ANGELES SAM SITE
CU
A SAM SITE LOCATED INM ENE OF LOS ANGELES
CONTAINS SIX UNREVETTED LAUNCHERS AND SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT.
3093 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS ONE NM ENE OF LOS
ANGELES: AT 21-00-4QN 075-41-43WO SIX UNREVETTED
LAUNCHERS EMPLACED. SITE ALSO CONTAINS 3 LARGE, ONE
MEDIUM, AND 2 SMALL TENTS.
FRUIT SEY RADAR AND 7
ASSOCIATED VANS IN THE CENTER OF THE SITE• 15 VANS,
7 HISSILE TRANSPORTERS, AND 6 UNIDENTIFIED VEHICLES
ON NORTH SIDE OF SITE. SERVICE ROAD CONFIGURATION NOT
EVIDENT.
3100
SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS
SA-2 SAM SITE HAS BEEN MOVED APPROXIMATELY 250 YAROS
WEST OF LOCATION REPORTED IN SEP 62, TO 21-01-45N7
175-41-50W•
SITED WATCH IS UNREVETTEO AND PROBADLY UNDER
CONSTRUCTION, CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING FACILTTTES AND
AND EQUIPMENT -- 6 PROBAGLE CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE
LAUNCHERS, FRUTT SET RADAR AND & ASSOCIATED VEHICLES
IN CENTRAL GUIDANCE AREA, ONE POSSIOLE MISSILE
CRANSPORTER, & TENTSY AND APPROXIMATELY 15 VEMICLES.
LAUNCHERS ARE NOT DEPLOYCO IN A CIRCLES
AND SITE
CONFIGURATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED.
7210ON: 075410
---
## Page 158
DocId: 32627026
Page
158
SEET
LOS INDIOS, REPORTEO MISSILE ACTIVITY
CU 203IN 07606W
3065 SITSUM
2 FEB 62 REPORTS
NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVEO.
3074 SITSUM
APR 62 REPORTS
NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED.
PROBABLE MINING ACTIVITY 2 NM SOUTH OF
SAN GERMAN AT 20-34-00N 076-08-004.
ACTIVITY CONSISTS OF SEVERAL SMALL STRIP
AREAS, 3 LINEAR CUTS INTO HILLSIDE AND
NUMEROUS SINGLE-STORY, GABLE-ROOFED BUILDINGS.
SEVERAL NEW ROADS AND 3 NEW RAILROAD SPURS
NOT SHOWN ON MAP SHEET 4977: 1, SERIES 8723%
SERVE THE
AREA.
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS, FACILITICS OR
UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED.
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
MILITARY ACTIVITY OBSERVED•
TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS.
SITSÜM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY ACTIVITY OBSERVED.
TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS.
NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MAY 62.
SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MISSILE
OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED.
3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED.
+ 3086 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY OR OTHER UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED.
3080 SITSUM 29 AUC 62 REPORTS
NO: MISSILE ACTIVITY NOTED.
---
## Page 159
DocId: 32627026
Page
159
LOS PALACIOS ARCA, MILITARY ENCAMPMENT
3101 SITSUM 14 00T 62 REPORTS
+ a 4:
MILITARY
LOS PALACIOS AT 22-39-45N083-18- 15W.
ENCAMPMENT WITH 17 LARGE TENTS, 20 SMALL
SMALL TRUCKS, IA LARGE TRUCKS, 11
UNTDENTIFIED VEHICLES OR PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, AND AN
AREA:OF OPEN STORAGE•:
CUX 2239N/ 8318W
---
## Page 160
DocId
: 32
7026
Page
160
MANAGUA AREA, EXPLOSIVES STORAGE
7. 3682
3 NM SH OF MANAGUA. FENCED AREA
CONTAINING 9 REVETTED STRUCTURES AND 10
SUPPORT BUILOINGSE ROAD SERVED.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- NONE.
3058 MCT 3 SEP 61 REPORTS
NO CHANGE SINCE MISSION 3045% 23 APR 610
* 3060 SITSUM 26 OCT 8I REPORTS
3 NM SA OF MANAGUA.
FENCED AREA CONTAINING 9 EARTH-COVEREO
HUNKERS, 2 PROBABLE CONCRETE BUNKERS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION, AND 10 SUPPORT
BUILDINGS.
3061 SITSUM G DEC 61 REPORTS
3 NM SW OF MANAGUA.
FENCED AREA: CONTAINING 9 EARTH-COVERED
BUNKERS® 2 PROBABLE CONCRETE BUNKERS UNDER A
CONSTRUCTION, AND 10 SUPPORT BUTLDINGS.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3071 MCI 15 MAR 62 REPORTS
3 NM SW OF MANAGUA.
FENCED AREA CONTAINING 9 HEAVILY REVETTED
HUNKERS, & CONCRETE BUNKERS PREVIOUSLY
REPORTED UNDER CONSTRUCTION APPEAR COMPLETED.
REVETMENTS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
IMMEDIATELY TO EAST OF THESE BUNKERS
ARE 6
POSSIBLE BUNKERS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
3078 MCI
2 MAY S2 REPORTS
FENCEO AREA CONTAINING LI REVETTED BUNKERS.
AND 6 ADOITIONAL BUNKERS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
LE ASSOCLATED BUILDINGS PLUS 2 UNDER
CONSTRUCTIONO
SEORET
CU 2256N 082200
---
## Page 161
DooId: 32627026
Page
161
MANAGUA MILITARY INSTALLATION:
THIS IS THE HEADQUARTERS FOR AN ARMORED
DIVISIONI
ARTILLERY DIVISION, AND THE 3RD
AND 4TH INFANTRY BATALLIONS:
3002 SITSUM 27 OCT 60 REPORTS
SOUTHEAST EDGE OF MANAGUA. CAMP CONTAINS
15 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS, 10 BARRACKS,
6. VEHICLE SHEDS, 9 STORAGE BUILDINGS, ONE
PROBABLE AMMUNITION BUNKER, ONE PROBABLE.
AMMUNITION BUNKER UNDER CONSTRUCTIONA
16 SUPPORT BUILDINGS, AND AN AIRFIELO
CONSTRUCTION (PIC TARGET 0586-1118%.
DEFENSES INCLUDE ONE G-GUN OP POSITION
ON HILL JUST NW OF BARRÄCKS, 6 GUNS
EMPLACED. ONE &-GUN AA POSITION UNDER
CONSTRUCTION O7 NM SE OF BARRACKS,
6 GUNS EXPLACEO. ONE 4-GUN AA POSITION
UNDER COMSTRUCTION LOT NN SSE OF BARRACKS:
1 GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 3-GUN AA POSITION
UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.8 NM SOUTH OF
BARRACKS, 3 GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 6-GUN AA
POSITION 1.6 NM.WEST OF BARRÄCKS, & GUNS
EMPLACEO• ZIGZAG TRENCH WITH FIRING BAŸS
NM EAST: OF: BARRACKS AREA• AT LEAST 100•
VEHICLES CARS AND TRUCKS) IN SHOPY
WAREHOUSE/BARRACKS AREA. ONE TANK AND 25
MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES ELSEWHERE IN CAMP
3058 MCT 3 SEp 61 REPORTS
SOUTHEAST EDGE OF MANAGUA. CAMP CONTAINS
15 ADMINESTRATION BUILDINGS, 1O BARRACKS,
6 VEHICLE SHEDS, 9 STORAGE BUILOINGS, ONE: 2
PROBABLE AMMUNITION BUNKER, ONE PROBABLE I
AMMUNITION BUNKER UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH
REINFORCEMENT TIMBERS IN PLACE, LOCATED 2
TOL NM ESE OF CADET SCHOOL BARRACKS, AT
UTM LR394698, 16 SUPPORT BUILDINGS.
DEFENSES INCLUDE -- ONE 6-GUN
DP POSITION ON HILL JUST NW OF BARRACKS,
6 GUNS TEMPLACED. ONE: 6-GUN AA POSITION
CU
---
## Page 162
26
Page
162
UNDER CONSTRUCTION OT NM SE OF BARRACKS
6 GUNS EMPLACEO. ONE 4-GUN AA POSITION
UNDER CONSTRUCTION 157 NA SSE OF BARRACKS,
4 GUNS EMPLACED.
ONE 3-GUN AA POSITION
UNDER CONSTRUCTION L.8 NM SOUTH OF
BARRACKS: 3 GUNS EMPLACED ONE 6-GUN AA
POSITION 1.6 NA WEST OF BARRACKS, 6 GUNS
EMPLACED. ZIG-ZAG TRENCH WITH FIRING DAYS
•SNE FASTTOE BARRACKS
ARCA• AFFLEAST 89%
VEHICLES AND 10 PROBABLE FIELD ARTILLERY
PIECES IN WAREHOUSE/BARRACKS AREA.
APPROXIMATELY 25 TENTS
AT EAST. END:
OF CAMP, T-SHAPED
EXCAVATION IN PROGRESS AT
UTM LR403669:
NM WEST OF CADET
SCHOOL BARRACKS. THREE PROBABLE ARMORED
CARS AÑO § CANVAS-COVERED VEHICLES PARKED
ON PARADE GROUND.
CAMP CONTAINS MANAGUA AIRFIELD, WHERE NO
AIRCRAFT WERE OBSERVED. RUNWAY IS UNDER:
CONSTRUCTION. AND NOT SERVICEABLE.
NO CRATES, RADAR OR ELECTRONICS OSSERVED.
NO DEFENSES OBSERVEO.
3060 SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS
SOUTHEAST EDGE OF MANAGUA• CAMP CONTAINS
15 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS, 10 BARRACKS,
6 VEHIGLE SHEDS, & STORAGE BUILDINGS, ONE
PRODABLE AMMUNITION BUNKER, ONE CONCRETE:
BUILDING IN EXCAVATION I02 NN ESE OF CADET
SCHOOL BARRACKS, AT UTM LR394698, 16
SUPPORT BÜILDINGS. DEFENSES INCLUDE -- ONE
6GUN DP POSITION ON HILL JUST NW OF
BARRACKS, & GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 6-GUN AA
POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 7 NM SE OF
BARRACKS, & GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 4-GUN AA
POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.7 NM SSE OF
BARRACKS, 4 GUNS: EMPLACED• ONE J-GUN AA
POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION LO8 NM SOUTH OF
BARRACKS, 3 GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 6-GUN AA/
POSITION 1.6 NM WEST OF BARRACKS, 6 GUNS
EMPLACED, ZIGZAG TRENCH WITH FIRING BAYS
AS NM EAST OF BARRACKS AREA.
DEAST 0O. VEHICLES AND 1a
PROGABLE FIELD
---
## Page 163
DocId: 3262
7076
Page
163
ARTILLERY PIECES IN WAREHOUSE/BARRACKS
AREA. APPROXIMATELY 25 TENTS AT EAST END:
OF CAMP, T-SHAPED EXCAVATION IN PROGRESS AT
UTM LR403660 1.3 NM WEST OF CADET SCHOOL
BARRACKS.
3061 SITSUM 6 DEC 61 REPORTS
SE EDGE OF MANAGUA. CAMP CONTAINS
I5 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS, I& BARRACKS
6 VEHICLE SHEDS,
9 STORAGE BUILDINGS, ONE
PROBABLE AMMUNITION BUNKERY 16 SUPPORT
BUTLDINGS.
T-SHAPED EXCAVATION IN PROGRESS
AT UTM LR403660 1.3 NM WEST
OF CADET SCHOOL
BARRACKS. ONE CONCRETE U-SHAPEO BUILDING
UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN EXCAVATION 1.2 NM ESE
OF CADET SCHOOL
CARRACKS, AT UTM LR394698.
DEFENSES -- ONE
OCCUPIED G-GUN DP POSITION
ON HILL JUST NW
OF BARRACKS, ONE OCCUPIED
G-GUN AAA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
SE: OF BARRACKS. ONE
OCCUPIED 4-GUN AAA
POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.7 N# SSE ÖF
BARRACKS• ONE OCCUPIED 3-GUN AAA POSITION /
UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.8 NA SOUTH OF
BARRACKS• ONE OCCUPIED &-GUN AAA POSITION
206 NM WEST OF BARRACKS• ZIGZAG TRENCH WITH
FIRING
BAYS .5 NM EAST OF BARRACKS AREA.
4: 3062 SITSUM 19 JAN 62 REPORTS:
:6 GUN UNOCCUPIED FA POSITION 2 NN-SOUTH
SOUTHWEST OF BARRACK AREA. CONSTRUCTION OF
AAA POSITIONS COMPLETE. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
AND RESURFACING ÖF RUNWAY STILL IN PROGRESS.
NO OTHER CHANGE SINCE DECEMBER 1961.
VEHICLES - - 13 PROBABLE TANKS, ONE POSSIBLE
TANK, ONE UOS. TANK, 7 TRACTOR/TRAILERS, 50
CARGO TRUCKS,
4 PIECES OF CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT AND APPROXIMATELY 25 MISCELLANEOUS
VEHICLES.
3067 SITSUM 21 FEB 62 REPORTS
NO MAJOR CHANGES OBSERVEO.:
VEHICLES -- TOTAL OF 126 VEHICLES INCLUDING 9
TRACTOR/TRAILERS
TRAILERSY
Od CARGO TRUCKS,
SEGRET
---
## Page 164
DocId
32
7026
Page
164
AND 60 MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES. INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
3071 MOT 15 MAR 62 REPORTSU
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES. LONG
NARROW BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION 09 NM
SOUTH OF CADET SCHOOL. IN AREA WHERE T-SHAPED
EXCAVATION WAS REPORTED ON MISSION 3061,
DEC 611
THERE IS A LARGE FENCED AREA
CONTAINING 2 LOOP ROADS• THERE ARE 2 EARTH-
COVERED DRIVE-THROUGH STRUCTURES ON SMALUER
ROAD AND ONE ON THE LARGER ROAD. A 6-GUN
OCCUPIED DP EMPLACEMENT HAS A BATTERY OF 3
GUNS WITHIN THE LARGER LOOP ROAD AND A
BATTERY OF 3 GUNS JUST WEST OF THE LOOP
ROAD. JUST NORTH OF LOOP ROAD AND OUTSIDE
THE FENCEO AREA YS A DIAMOND-SHAPED GROUND
SCAR AND A LARGE CONCRETE STRUCTURE UNDER
CONSTRUCTION WHICH MAY EVENTUALLY BE EARTH-
COVERCO. THE T-SHAPEO EXCAVATION REPORTED IN
MISSION
30610
IS NOT NOW EVIDENT.
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN U-SHAPED BUILDING
UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.2 NM ESE OF CADET
SCHOOL SINCE MISSION 30610 DEC 610 HOWEVER,
INMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THIS STRUCTURE THERE
IS GROUNO SCARRING AND A COMPARISON OF
MISSION 3045• APR GI, SHOWED THAT THERE WAS
A LARGE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED STRUCTURE WHICH
NOW IS APPARENTLY BURIED.
DEFENSES -- A 6-GUN OP POSITION NN OF BARRACKS
AREA - 2 EMPLACEMENTS OCCUPIED. A 6-GUN
UNOCCUPTED FA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION
2 NA SSH OF CADET SCHOOL• OTHER DEFENSES
UNCHANGED SINCE MISSION. 3067, FEB 620
: 3078 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
CONSTRUCTION CONTINUES ON EARTH-COVERED
BUILDINGS TO THE SOUTH AND DEFENSIVE
POSITIONS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH. ONE NEW
BUILDING, POSSIOLY A THEATER, UNDER
CONSTRUCTION ON EAST EDGE OF BARRACKS AREA.
VENICLES
" APPROXIMATELY 10 ARMORED
VEHICLES, 15 TANK TRANSPORTERS, 11O TRUCKS,
SHORETI
---
## Page 165
DocId
32
7026
Page
165
AND 30 OTHER VEHICLES.
APPROXIMATELY 11Q CARGO AND 30 MISCELLANEOUS
VEHICLES.
= 3079. SITSUN 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
VEHICLES: -- 14 TANK TRANSPORTERST
S PROBASLE POL TRANSPORTERS, 285 TRUCKS+
ONE TRAILER VAN AND NUMEROUS SEDANS.X
NER BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT OLD
MOTOR POOL AREA. POSSIBLE THEATER BUILDING
ALSO UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
3A8& SITSUN 6 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MAY 62.
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON BUILDINGS.
AT LEAST 26G TRUCKS, 14 TANK-TRANSPORTERS,
5 POSSIBLE POL TRANSPORTERS, AND NUMEROUS
AUTOS. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE
EARLY JUN 620
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON BUILDINGS.
VEHICLES -- AT LEAST 200, PREDOMINATELY
TRUCKS. NO TANKS NOTED.
IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE BUILDING AREA A
LARGE AREA IS BEING CLEARED FOR UNDETERMINEO
PURPOSES.
30A5 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
MOTOR POOL BUILOING AND OUTDOOR THEATER
APPEAR COMPLETE. CONSTRUCTION ON LARGE
CONCRETE BUILDING AND 2 DRIVE-THROUGH
STRUCTURES COMPLETE, BUT STRUCTURES HAVE NOT
BEEN EARTH-COVERED. LARGE AREA OF
CONSTRUCTION SOUTH OF BUILDINGS STILL BEING
CLEARED AND LEVELEO IS PIECES OF EQUIPMENT?
NOTED).
DEHICLES/ COUTPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 200
VEHICLES, PREDOMINANTLY TRUCKS, PARKED AND
IN USE THROUGHOUT FACILITY.
NO APPARENT CHANGES IN AREA DEFENSES SINGE:
TOM 624
S8090
---
## Page 166
DocId: 3262
7076
Page
166
3886 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS
VEHICLES - APPROXIMATELY 300 VEHICLES,
PREDOMINANTLY TRUCKS, PARKED AND IN USE
THROUGHOUT FACILITY.
LARGE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION SOUTH OF
BUILDING AREA STILL BEING CLEAREO AND
LEVELED.
NO OTHER CHANGES IN FACILITIES OR DEFENSES
SINCE JUL 620
* 3088 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
DEFENSES -- NO CHANGE SINCE JUL 62.
CONSTRUCTION SOUTH OF HILLS CONTINUING.
NO: APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE
VEHICLES -- APPROXIMATELY
THROUGHOUT AREA.
350 VEHICLES
---
## Page 167
DocId: 32627026
Page
167
SERRETS
MANATI SAM SITE
CU 2113N 07702W
31A0 SITSUM
7OCT 62 REPORTS
NM SW OF MANATI AT 21-13-45N 077-0215W SA-2 SAM
SITE,
UNREVETTED AND STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION,
CONTAINING THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT -
MISSILE LAUNCHERS, POSSIBLE FRUIT SET RADAR AND
APPROXIMATELY 6 ASSOCIATED VEHICLES IN GUIDANCE AREA,
3 PROBABLE
MISSILE-HOLD REVETMENTS EACH WITH 2 POSSIBLE
MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, AND APPROXIMATELY 6 TENTS.
SECRETS
---
## Page 168
DocId: 32627026
Page
4168
MANZANILLO AREA, MILITARY ACTIVITY
3098 SITSUM 5 OCT 62 REPORTS
2.8 NM SSE OF MANZANILLO..
AN AREA OF UNIDENTIFIEO MICITARY ACTIVITY
CONTAINING 6 STORAGE/MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS,
NUMEROUS SMALL TENTS, TO UNIDENTIFIEO
VEHICLES, CONSIDERABLE TRACK ACTIVITY,
TRENCH SYSTEMS
AND SMALL ARMS EMPLACEMENTS.
INMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE
MANZANILLO
CU. 2017N
7706W
---
## Page 169
DocId: 32627026
Page
169
• 1
MANZANILLO SAM SITER
3098 SITSUN 5 OCT 62 REPORTS
2.5 NM SSE OF MANZANILLO AT 20-18-20N
077-06-08W.
SA-2 SAM SITE CONTATNING 6 MISSILE
TRANSPORTERS, 6 MISSILE LAUNCHERS, FRUIT SET
RADAR WITH 5 VANS
9 UNIDENTIFICO VEHICLES+
10 ADOITIONAL VANS, AND OPEN STORAGES
ALL EOUIPMENT UNREVETTED.
CU:
20ION 07706W
---
## Page 170
DocId: 326
27026
Page
170
MARTEL AREA, NAVAL AMMO STORAGE
3078 MCT 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
•5 NM N# OF MARTEL NAVAL AIR STATION.
PUNKER, ONE BUILDING. ROAD CONNECTS
STORAGE AREA WITH AIR STATION.
CU 2300N 08246W
---
## Page 171
EE MARTEL NAVAL AIR STATION
• 3078: MCT 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- NONE.
DEFENSES
TRENCH SYSTEM WITH SEVERAL
AX
POSITIONS AND: 3 OCCUPIED PROBABLE AAA
EMPLACEMENTS ON SOUTH SIDE OF SH END OF
RUNWAY. 3. EXCAVATIONS AT SW END OF RUNWAY. ARE
PROBABLE BUNKERS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. TWO NEW
PIERS ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON NORTH SIDE
OF NAVAL AIR STATION• APPROXIMATELY 35
TRUCKS PARKED IN AREA&
* 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE Z MAY 620
AIRCRAFT NONE • 1
• 3680 SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- NONE OBSERVED.
NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MAY 620
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON 3 PROBABLE
BUNKERS AND 2 NEW PIERS ON NORTH SIDE OF
NAVAL AIR STATION.
0 3882 SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGE TO FACILITIES SINCE
JUNE 520
AIRCRAFT -- NONE•
CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING ON BUNKERS AND PIERS•
3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- NONE•
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE.
NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MAY 62.
BUNKERS AND PIERS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
3094 SITSUM 8 JUL 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT - NONE&
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE• NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES
SINCE MAY 62. BUNKERS STILL UNDER
CONSTRUCTION. NUMEROUS VENICLES PARKED ON
SAPRON NEAR HANGAR.
CU: 2300N 08246W
Docta: 32627026 Page 171
---
## Page 172
* 3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
AIRCRADE -- NONE.
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE: SIX OCCUPIED LIGHT AAA
POSITIONS JUST SOUTH OF RUNWAY. CONSTRUCTION
CONTINUING ON 3 BUNKERS• ONE PIER ON
NORTH SIDE OF AIRFIELD APPEARS COMPLETE, ONE
PIER: STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION•
NO OTHER
CHANGE IN FACILITIES.
3086 SITSUM S AUG 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- NONE OBSERVED.
CONSTRUCTION CONTINUES ON BUNKERS AND
ONE PIER.
NO CHANGE IN OTHER FACILITIES OR DEFENSES
SINCE JUL 62.
3088. SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE• 24 CRATES (24 X 8 FF)
AND 16 TRUCKS ON APRON• NO CHANGE IN
FACILITIES SINCE JUL 62• CONSTRUCIION
CONTINUING ON BUNKERS•
(FOR INFORRATION ON MARIEL SAM SITED HARIEL
MILITARY INSTALLATION, AND MARIEL
NAVAL
PORTO SEE
SITUATION SUMMARY PART
PAR R63-6201
Dootd: 32627026 Page 172
---
## Page 173
•1 MARIEL NAVAL PORTA
CU 2301N 08245W
0586
• G-3002, 27 OCT 68 REPORTS. NORTH EDGE OF MARIEL,
NE SIDE OF MARIEL BAY. 4,500 FT OF PRINCIPAL WHARFAGE..
1 PIER 680 FT LONG FOR LOADING CEMENT, I PIER 200 FT
LONG, 1 PIER 190 FT LONG. NUMEROUS SMALLER PIERS-N
MARINE RAILHAY L90 FT LONG. LARGE QUANTITY OF LOUSNES
MATERIALS IN OPEN STORAGE ADJACENT TO WHARF ON NE STOE NEE
OF BAY• SMALLER AMOUNT OF U/I MATERIALS ON LARGE
RAIL-SERVED PIER JUST NORTH OF MARIEL
G-3051, 28 JUNE 61e REPORTS. VESSELS -- ONE
FREIGHTER AT LA BOCA PIER• ONE FREIGHTER AT LARGE PIER
JUST NORTH OF MARTEL• ONE PATROL BOAT AT MARITIMAS
MARIEL PIER. CARGO -- NONE OF SIGNIFICANCE OBSERVED.
DEFENSES - APPROXIMATELY 3 UNOCCUPIED GUN POSITIONS
ON LA BOCA SIDE OF HARBOR ENTRANCE.
ONE 6-GUN FA
POSITION AT 23-OON 082-47-47W• TRENCHING ACTIVITY
EVIDENT 2•4 NM WNW OF MARIEL. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT - ONE
POSSIBLE FIRECAN RADAR VANº 4 PROBABLE MILITARY
VEHICLES, 5 UNIDENTIFIEO VEHICLES, AND APPROXIMATELY
68 CARGO TRUCKS ARE PARKED IN A FENCED FIELO NEXT TO
A RECTANGULAR BUILDING AT 22-59-35N 082-45-15We NINE
PROBABLE BOXCARS
5 PROBABLE TANK CARS ON PIER JUST
NORTH OF MARIEL.
• G-30549 29 JULY 61 REPORTS•
A TOTAL OF 2 VESSELS
ONE FREIGHTER,
359 FT LONG. AND ONE TANKER 390 FT LONGI
BOTH AT LA BOCA PIER. NO SIGNIFICANT CARGOES, HARBOR
DEFENSES OR OTHER ITEMS OF MILITARY SIGNIFICANCE.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION..
• G-3067, 22 FEB 62 REPORTS. NO UNUSUAL CON-
CENTRATIONS OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT: OR SUPPLY STOCKPILES
OBSERVED.
VESSELS -4 MOTOR TORPEDO BOATS, 2 PATROL
VESSELS, 4 CARGO SHIPS.
• G-3071, 15 MAR 62 REPORTS.
SUBMARINES
- NONE O
SURFACE COMBATANT -- 4 KRONSHTAOI-CLASS PATROL CRAFTS
1173 FT. LONG) MOGREO ON SOUTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR
STATION. 4(83 FT LONG) PT BOATS MOORED ALONGSIDE
UNLOENTIFIED SHIP (APPROXIMATELY 160 FT LONG) ON NORTH.
OF NAVAL AIR STATIONS AUXILIARY/MERCHANT ME
DocId: 32627026
Page 173
---
## Page 174
BARGEST 3 UNIDENTIFIED SMALL CRAFT, 2 FREIGHTERS AT
MARVEL MOLE. 2 BARGES AT NORTH PIER,
NUMEROUS SMALL
CRAFT THROUGHOUT PORT• AMPHIBIOUS - NONE•
LOGISTICS/MATERIEL -- SHIPPING CRATES AT MARIEL MOLE.
• G-3074, 1 APR 62 REPORTS• SUBMARINES - NONE.
SURFACE COMBATANT •
-: 2 KRONSHTAOT-CLASS PATROL CRAFT
AND 2 PT BOATS MOORED ON SOUTH SIDE, 2 KRONSHTADT-
CLASS PATROL CRAFT AND 2 PT BOATS MOGREO ON NORTH
SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION. 4 POSSIBLE PATROL CRAFT
MOORED NW OF NAVAL AIR STATION. AUXILIARY/MERCHANT. CH
ONE FREIGHTER IN HARBOR IMMEDIATELY EAST OF NAVAL AIRS
STATION• ONE FREIGHTER AT MARIEL MOLE. 2 POSSIBLE
BARGES MOORED AT MARIEL QUAY• 2 SMALL COASTAL CRAFT
MOORED AT NORTH PIER• NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT THROUGHOUT
HARBOR: LOGISTICS/MATERIEL -- LARGE STACKS OF 11
UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL ON MARTEL MOLE• SEVERAL SMALL
STACKS OF UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL ON SOUTH PIER•
NUMEROUS SMALL
STACKS OF UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL ON
MARANTE WHARVES.
• G-3078, 2 HAY 62 REPORTS: NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES
SINCE MISSION 3002, 27 OCT 60• OPPOSITE CEMENT PLANT,
2 KRONSHTADI CLASS PATROL VESSELS AND 2 PT BOATS
MOORED ON NORTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION. 4 POSSIBLE
PC MOORED NW
OF NAVAL AIR STATION. 2 KRONSHTADE
CLASS PATROL
VESSELS, 4 PT BOATS, AND ONE UNIDENTIFIEO
SMALL CRAFT MOORED ON SOUTH SIDE OF NAVAL
AIR STATION•
2 KRONSHTADT CLASS PATROL VESSELS AND ONE PT BOAT
MOORED SW OF NAVAL
AIR STATION• 4 PT BOATS MOGRED JUST
SOUTH OF NORTHWEST END OF NAVAL AIR STATION RUNWAY•
2 FREIGHTERS MOOREO AT LARGE PIER JUST NORTH OF.
MARIEL• 2 POWER-DARGES MOORED OPPOSITE CEMENT PLANT.
ONE SMALL COASTAL VESSEL AT ANCHOR NORTHWEST OF MARIEL.
NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT•
NO AMPHIBIOUS-TYPE VESSELS.
GESERVED• PIER NORTH OF MARIEL CONTAINS VARIETY OG
UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL. VESSELS -- ONE EX-US PF-TYPE
FRIGATE MOORED AT CEMENT PLANT PIER, 2 KRONSHTADT-CLASS
PATROL VESSELS, AND 2 PT BOATS MOORED ON NORTH SIDE OF
NAVAL AIR STATIONS 4 PATROL CRAFT MOORED: NW OF NAVAL
AIR STATION, 2. KRONSHTAOT-CLASS PATROL VESSELSO 4PT
BOATS AND ONE UNIDENTIFIED SMALL CRAFT MOORED ON
SOUTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION 2 KRONSTADT-CLASS
AcId: 32627026
Page 174
---
## Page 175
DocId
: 32627026
Page
175
AND ONE PT BOAT KOORED SW OF NAVAL AIR STATION, 4 PT
BOATS MOORED JUST SOUTH OF NW END OF NAVAL AIR STATION
RUNWAY, 2 LARGE FREIGHTERS MOORED AT LARGE PIER JUST
NORTH OF MARIEL: 2 POWER BARGES MOORED OPPOSITE CEMENT
PLANT, ONE SMALL COASTAL VESSEL ANCHORED NORTH OF
MARIEL, ONE SMALL VESSEL AT ANCHOR NORTH OF NAVAL AIR
STATION, AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT.
6-3079, 22 MAY 62 REPORTS.
VESSELS -- 2 FREIGHTERS
AT PIER NEAR ENTRANCE TO HARBOR, 2 BARGES AT CEMENT
PIER. ONE SMALL FREIGHTER ANCHORED IN BAY. Y PT, 4
KRONSMTADT AND ONE PROBABLE EX-US PCE DOCKED ON SOUTH
SIDE OF AIRFIELD, 2 KRONSHTADT, 3 PT AND 2 COASTAL
KERCHANT VESSELS DOCKED NORTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE PT
ENTERING HARBOR. LOGISTICS/MATERIEL -- UNIDENTIFIED
MATERIEL ON MARIEL MOLE.
6-3080, 6 JUNE 62 REPORTS.. VESSELS -- 2 KRONSHTÄOT-
CLASS DOCKED NORTH OF AIRFIELD. 3 KRONSHTADT-CLASSI
ONE PATROL BOAT, 8 PT BOATS: SOUTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE EX-
US PCE AND ONE BARGE AT CEMENT PIER. ONE LARGE MERCHANT
SHIP AT WHARF AT MOUTH OF HARBOR, ONE LARGE MERCHANT
SHIP AT WHARF JUST NORTH OF MARIEL. LOGISTICSI
MATERIAL -- UNIDENTIFIED MATERIAL ON WHARF.
0-3082. 18 JUNE 62 REPORTS.
VESSELS -- 2 LARGE
CARGO, 3 SMALL CARGO, 1 EX-US PCE,
7 PT, 2 PATROL
BOATS, 5 BARGES AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT. MINOR
STOCKPILING OF UNIDENTIFIEO MATERIAL ON MARTEL WHARF.
G-30631 29 JUNE BZ REPORTS. VESSELS -- ONE LARGE
CARGO, 2 SMALL CARGO, 2 PATROL CRAFT, 9 PT BOATS, AND
5 BARGES. UNIDENTIFIEO MATERIAL ON WHARF AND PIER•
G-3084, 8 JULY G2 REPORTS. VESSELS - TWO
KRONSHTADT-CLASS DOCKED NORTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE
KRONSHTADT-CLASS, ONE POSSIBLE KRONSHTADT-CLASS, 7 PT
BOATS, AND TWO POSSIBLE PT BOATS DOCKED SOUTH OF
AIRFIELD. ONE PROBABLE EX-US PF AND ONE CARGO SHIP
DOCKED AT PIER NEAR CEMENT PLANT: TWO CARGO SHIPS
DOCKED AT PIER ON SE SIDE OF HARBOR. UNIDENTIFIED
MATERIAL ON WHARF ANO PIER.
---
## Page 176
DooId:326
27026
Page
176
G- 3985.
JULY 62 REPORTS.
VESSELS -- ONE PT AND
ONE KRONSHTADT-CLASS MOORED NORTH OF AIRFIELD, 2
KRONSHTADT-CLASS AND 6 PT MOORED JUST SOUTH OF
FIELD, ONE PF MOORED AT CEMENT PLANT PIER, ONE
FREIGHTER MOORED AT MARIEL PIERS AND ONE FREIGHTER
MOORED AT CEMENT PLANT PIER. NO CHANGE IN PORT
FACILITIES. LOGISTICS/MATERIAL - UNIDENTIFIED MATERIAL
STACKED ON MARIEL PIER.
3086 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS
VESSELS - 2 FREIGHTERS, 2 KRONSHTAÖT-CLASS.
AND 4 PT BOATS MOORED NORTH OF AIRFIELO:
ONE KRONSHTADT-CLASS AND 4 PT BOATS MOOREO
SOUTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE PT BOAT MOORED AT
CEMENT PLANT PIER.
NO CHANGE IN PORT FACILITIES SINCE JUL 62.
•LOGISTICS/MATERIEL -- NONE OBSERVED.
6- 3088r 29 AUG 62 REPORTSI
VESSELS - 13 PT BOATS MOORED NORTH AND
SOUTH OF AIRFIELD OF WHICH 7 ARE KOMAR-CLASS
(GUIDED MISSILE BOATS) AND ONE IS PROBABLY
IN PROCESS OF CONVERSION. ONE UNIDENTIFIED
VESSEL SW OF NAVAL PIER AND ONE UNIDENTIFIED
VESSEL, APPROXIMATELY 270 X 50 FT, AT NAVAL
PIER. ONE FREIGHTER AT MARIEL PIER WITH
11 LARGE TRUCKS, 14 MEDIUM TRUCKS AND
UNIDENTIFIED RATERIAL
ON PIER. TWENTY-FOUR
CRATES 124 X 8 FTI AND 1G TRUCKS ON APRON AT AIRFIELD.
---
## Page 177
DocId: 32627026
Page
177
MARIEL SAM SITE
G-30088
29 AUG 62 REPORTS:
2.8 NM WNW
OF MARIEL AIRFIELD AT 23-00-55N
082-49-384.
SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION• SIX
UNREVETTED LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH LAUNCHERS
12 LAUNCHERS HAVE CANVAS OR NET COVERING),
FRUIT SET RADAR WITH 6 ASSOCIATED VANS, 6
MISSILE TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED
TRAILERS, APPROXIMATELY 20 VEHICLES, AND 2
TENTS.
1,20O YOS WEST OF MARIEL SA-Z SITE IS A
HEADQUARTERS AREA CONSISTING OF 4 ONE-STORY
BUILDINGS AND A STORAGE AREA WITH IL STORAGE
BUILDINGS AND ONE H-SHAPED BUILDING.
VEHICLES -- SEVENTEEN SMALL TRUCKS,
TRAILERS, 13 JEEPS,
12 LARGE TRUCKS, II
SMALL TRAILERS, 16
POSSIBLE ARMORED CARSA
6 LARGE AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRATES, & TENTS.
AND 20 UNIDENTIFIEC VEHICLES IN OPEN STORAGE
VESSELS -M 4
PATROL CRÄFT AT ANCHOR
ARROYO DONA
MARIAr
3 ARE APPROXIMATELY
6A X 1O FT AND ONE 50 X LA FT.
CU
2300N
08249W
0586
---
## Page 178
DocId:
32627026
Page
178
MATANZAS AREA, MILITARY ACTIVITY
CU. 2303N 08135W
3078 MCI
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OR EQUIPMENT
BUILDUP NOTED. NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES
AT CIUDAD MILITAR, INSTITUTO CIVICO MILITAR OR
IN AREA DEFENSES SINCE MAR 62• APPROXIMATELY
62- CARS AND 5 TRUCKS NOTED AT CIUDAD MILITAR.
THE 6 FA POSITIONS 300. FT NE OF THE MICROWAVE
TOWER CONE NM NORTH OF MATANZAS) ARE
UNOCCUPIED•
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY O2 REPORTS
APPARENT BUILDUP OF MILITARY EQUIFMENT
TROOPS. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES AT
CIUDAD MILITARY, INSTITUTO CIVICO MILITAR,
OR IN AREA DEFENSES SINCE 2 MAY 62.
VEHICLES -- APPROXIMATELY 41 CARS, ONE TRUCK
AND ONE BUS NOTED AT CIUDAD MILITAR.
---
## Page 179
DocId
371
7026
Page
179
239227
MATANZAS
AREA.
MILITARY
ACTIVITY
CU
2303N 08135W
MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OR EQUIPMENT
BUILDUP NOTED. NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES
AT CIUDAD MILITAR, INSTITUTO CIVICO MILITAR OR
IN AREA DEFENSES SINCE MAR 62. APPROXIMATELY
62. CARS AND 5 TRUCKS NOTED AT CIUDAD MILITAR.
THE 6 FA POSITIONS 30B. FT. NE OF THE MICROWAVE
TOWER CONE NA NORTH OF MATANZAST ARE
UNOCCUPIED•
3079.SITSUM 22 MAY 6Z REPORTS
APPARENT BUILDUP OF MILITARY
EQUIPMENT
OR TROOPS. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES AT
CIUDAD MILITARY,
INSTITUTO CIVICO MILITAR,
OR IN AREA DEFENSES SINCE 2 KAY 62.
VEHICLES -- APPROXIMATELY 41 CARS,
ONE TRUCK
AND ONE BUS NOTED AT CIUDAD MILITAR.
---
## Page 180
DocId
32627026
Page
180
MATANZAS; PORT FACILITIES
3078 MCI 2 MAY 52 REPORTS
AUXILIARY/HERCHANT VESSELS - 2 LARGE
FREIGHTERS AT DUBROCO WHARF, AND ONE
OREOGER IN OPERATION BETWEEN ARMOUR
PIER AND NEW PIER.
UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL STORED ON CUSTOMS QUAY
AND DUBROCO WHARF:
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE APR 62.
3079 SITSUN 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
AUXILIARY/MERCHANT
2 LARGE FREIGHTERS
AT DUBROCQ WHARF, ONE SMALL FREIGHTER AT
DISTILLING PIER, ONE LARGE FREIGHTER AT
ARMOUR PIER, ONE LÄRGE FREIGHTER DOCKED
IN BAY AND ONE DREDGE NEAR TEXAS
PIER.
ROAD UNDER IMPROVEMENT ON NW SIDE OF BAY.
3080 SITSUM
6 JUN 62 REPORTS
VESSELS -- 2 LARGE FREIGHTERS AT
DUBROCQ
WHARF, ONE LARGE FREIGHTER AT NEW PIER, ONE
DREDGE NEAR NEW PIER.
NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES OBSERVEO.
3082 SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS
APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES.
• VESSELS -- ONE CARGO SHIP• INCOMPLETE INFO.
3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
- 2 FREIGMTERS AT DUBROCO
WHARF, EACH APPROXIMATELY 435 FT LONG,
AND ONE SMALL SHIP AT NEW WHARF.
NO APPARENT CHANGE TO FACILITIES SINCE FEB G2.
02979
DIJ1a1
---
## Page 181
DocId: 32627026
Page
181
3085 5173U1 12
JUL 62 REPORTS
VESSELS -I ONE PIPELINE DREOGE NEAR ARMOUR
PIER, ONE CARGO VESSEL AT NEW MOLASSES PIERS
ONE SMALL CARGO VESSEL AT CUBA DISTILLING
PIER, 2 CARGO VESSELS AT DUBROCO WHARFO A
FEW SMALL CRAFT SCATTERED IN HARBOR AREA.
AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT BERTHED AND
ANCHORED IN RIO SAN JAUN.
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE FEB
MATERIEL/EQUIPMENT -- NO CONCENTRATIONS
OBSERVEO IN MARBOR AREA.
3686 SITSUM
5 AUG 62
REPORTS
VESSELS -- 3 FREIGHTERS, ONE AT DUBROGG
WHARF AND
2 AT NEW WHARF• ONE DREDGE NEAR
ARMOUR PIERO SMALL CRAFT SCATTEREO IN
HARBOR. ONE FREIGHTER OUTBOUND 3 NM NE OF
MATANZAS.
RAIL CARS -- 35 BOXCARS NOTED IN AREA NEAR
NEW WHARFE 9 POSSIBLE TANK CARS NEAR STORAGE
TANKS+ 56 POSSIBLE TANK CARS NORTH OF
FERTILIZER PLANT.
VEMICLES -- CONVOY OF & MILITARY TRUCKS
HEADING NE ON ROAD NEAR SHORELINE AT
DUBROCO WHARF•
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE
FEB 62.
3088 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
VESSELS -- ONE FREIGHTER DOCKED AT MOLASSES
PIER.
VEHICLES - APPROXIMATELY 22 TRUCKS PARKED
AT DUBROCO WHARF.
NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE
JUL 62.
Dinardorm
---
## Page 182
DocId: 32627026
Page
182
MATANZAS
SAM
SITE
6-3088, 29 AUG 62 REPORTS.
5 NM ESE OF MATANZAS AT 23-61-50N
(981-29-1410
SA-2 SAM
SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. 5IX
UNREVETTED LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH 6
LAUNCHERS. FRUIT SET RADAR INSTALLEO WITH 4
ASSOCIATED VANS, 6 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS
WITH CANVAS-COVERED
AGQUISITION RADAR.
TRAILERS, POSSIBLE
AT LEAST I2 VANS OR
VEHICLES. PROBABLE STAR CONFIGURATION.
CU 2301N
08129W
CO00sy
---
## Page 183
DooId: 32627026
Page
183
MINAS DEL FRIO, POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION CAMP
CU
2000N
07659W
3078 MCT
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
AREA NO LONGER BELIEVEO TO DE A
MILITARY CAMP.
IT IS PROGABLY A ROAD CONSTRUCTION CAMPETINO..
NO EVIDENCE OF MILITARY ACTIVITY OF ANY
3479 SITSUM 22 MAY G2 REPORTS
CHANGE SINGE 2 MAY 620
3082 SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO MILITARY ACTIVITY OR CONCONTRATIONS NOTED.
INCOMPLETE INFO.
J2G.1
---
## Page 184
DocId: 32627026
Page
184
NUEVITAS, SUSPECT MISSILE AREA
SOVIET PERSONNEL REPORTED IN THE AREA.
DATE OF INFO.
OCT 62
3100 SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS
SENADO SAM SITED 17 NM WNW OF NUEVITAS.
• NO OTHER MISSILE ACTIVITY NOTEO WITHIN
16-NM RADIUS OF NUEVITAS.
CU 2133N 07715W
820307
---
## Page 185
DocId: 32627026
Page
185
PALMA SORIANO AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION
CU Z01ON A7600W
3078 MCI
Z MAY 62 REPORTS
308 NM SOUTH OF PALMA SORIANO.
BARRACKS, ONE BUTLOING FOUNDATION:
3 SUPPORT
BUILOINGS AND APPROXIMATELY
25 AN
POSITIONS ALONG PERIMETER FENCE:
MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OR EQUIPMENT NOTED.
_SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
CHANGE SINCE 2 MAY 62.
3HAN SITSUM
BARRACKS.
& JUN 62 REPORTS
SUPPORT BUILDINGS,
APPROXIMATELY
25 AW POSITIONS
ALONG PERIMETER FENCES AND
SEVERAL PERSONNEL TRENCHES.
VEHICLES = ONE TRUCK.
NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED.
3081 SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS
APPARENT CHANGES NOTEO SINCE
MAY 02.
3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MAY 02.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT
-- NOME.
---
## Page 186
DocId: 32627026
Page
186
SECRET
PLAYA BARACOA AIRFIELD
CU
2302N 082354
RELATIVELY SMALL AIRFIELD NEAR AIR AND NAVAL
TRAINING FACILITIES. THIS IS THE MAIN
HELICOPTER LOCATION IN CUBA..
3002 SITSUM 27 OCT 60 REPORTS
305 NM SW OF SANTA FE. 5,400 X 150 FT
NNE/SSW PROBABLE BLACKTOR RUNWAY.
LISTED IN ASSOTWO VOL GO JAN GL.
TOTAL OF 12 AIRCRAFT -- ONE C-47, ONE
LIAISON, 6 HOUND, 3 HARE, AND ONE POSSIBLE
HARE. RUNWAY IS SERVICEABLE. 8 SHIPPING
CRATES (MEASURING 25 X 14 FTL, 4 PROBACLE
POL TRUCKS, AND APPROXIMATELY 10
MISCELLANEQUS VEHICLES. NO ELECTRONICS
INSTALLATION OBSERVED. DEFENSES INCLUDE TWO
4-GUN AND ONE 3-GUN AAA POSITIONS
(UNOCCUPIED) ANO ONE POSSIBLE 3-GUN AAA
POSITION (UNOCCUPIEDI. ONE 5-GUN CD
POSITION (PROBABLY OCCUPIED) IS LOCATED
YO WNW OF THE AIRFIELO.
3054 SITSUM 29 JUL 61 REPORTS
PROBABLE HOUND OBSERVED. POSSIOLE NEW
CONSTRUCTION ON RAMP IN FRONT OF CONTROL
TOWER, AND PROBABLE NEW HANGAR U/C•
INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION.
3058 MCI
• 3 SEP 61 REPORTS
A TOTAL OF LO AIRCRAFT OBSERVED--I C-47%
7 HOUND, 2 HARE • RUNWAY SERVICEABLE.
TWELVE 25 X 1A FT CRATES, NUMEROUS SMALLER
CRATES. NO ELECTRONICS OUSERVED.
ONE 3-GUN AAA POSITION (UNOCCUPIED)
-TWO-POSSIOLE 4-GUN AAA POSITION
(UNOCCUPIEDI ONE POSSIBLE 3-GUN AAA
---
## Page 187
DocId: 32627026
Page
187
3060 SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS
54400 X 150 FT NNE/SSW BLACKTOP RUNWAY.
SERVICEABLE• NO ELECTRONICS OBSERVED:
3-GUN AAA POSITION (UNOCCUPIEDI. THO
POSSIELE A-GUN AAA POSITIONS (UNOCCUPIEDI
ONE POSSIBLE 3-GUN AAA POSITION
UNGICCUPLEDI A TOTAL OF 12 INCLUDING, 6
HOUNDS.
HARES, AND ONE C-47.
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT - B TRUCKS, 6 SMALL
VEHICLES
APPROXIMATELY 5 POSSIBLE LARGE
SHIPPING CRATES, AND 7 SMALL SHIPPING
CRATES.
30G1 SITSUM
6 DEC 6I REPORTS
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE•
HARDSTAND IN FRONT OF MAIN HANGAR BEING
RESURFACED. NEW HANGAR IN LATE STAGES OF
CONSTRUCTION ON SOUTH END OF AIRFIELD.
CONSTRUCTION GRAVEL DUMPED ON SOUTH END OF
4 SHIPPING
CRATES.
DEFENSES
- TWO 3-GUN OCCUPIED AAA
POSITIONS, ONE 3-GUN UNOCCUPIED AAA
POSITIONA AND ONE 4-GUN UNOCCUPIED AAA
POSITION•
AIRCRAFT
-- 9 HARE, 2 HOUND, AND ONE C-47:
3062 SITSUM 19 JAN 62 REPURTS
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. HANGAR UNDER CONSTRUCTION•
FOUR (4) PROB SHIPPING CRATES.
AIRCRAFT
- TOTAL OF 17. INCLUDING (2).
CRATE,
HOUND, (7) HARE AND (1) C-47.
DEFENSES
-- FOUR (4) 3 GUN UNOCCUPIED AAA
POSITIONS.
SITSUM 2 FEB 62 REPORTS
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE.
AIRCRAFT --
TOTAL OF 3 INCLUDING Z CRATE AND
1 C-47• INCOMPLETE INFORMATION•
3067- SITSUM 21 FEB 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 8 INCLUDING 2 HOUND.
4 HARE, ONE C-47, ONE CRATE.
* ...
---
## Page 188
DocId: 326
7026
Page
188
3071 MCI IS MAR 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN RUNWAY, FACILITIES, OR
DEFENSES SINCE MISSION 3062, JAN 62.
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 17 INCLUDING, 2 CRATER
ONE C-47, & HOUND. S HARED 2 HELICOPTER
FUSELAGES, ONE UNIDENTIFIED DERELICT.
3674 SITSUM
APR 62
AIRCRAFT -- 2 CRATED ONE C-47, ONE HOUND,
3 POSSIBLE MARE.
DEFENSES -- ONE
UNOCCUPIED 3 GUN AAA POSITION
INCOMPLETE
INFORMATION•
3078 MCI
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
CONSTRUCTION WORK STILL IN PROGRESSO
THE TWO 3-GUN AAA POSITIONS AT THE SOUTH
END OF RUNWAY ARE OCCUPIED.
AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 20 INCLUDING, ONE
C-47. 2 CRATE, 8 MARE, 6 HOUND, Z FUSELAGES
(HELICOPTERS, AND ONE UNIDENTIFIEO SE.
ONE UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE-ENGINE•
DEFENSES
-- 2 OCCUPIED LIGHT 3-GUN AAA
POSITIONS JUST SOUTH OF AIRFIELD, ONE
UNOCCUPIED LIGHT 3-GUN AAA POSITIONS NORTH OF
OPERATIONS BUILDINGe AND ONE UNOCCUPIEO LIGHT
3-GUN AAA POSITIONS EAST OF RUNWAY.
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. NEW HANGAR UNDER
CONSTRUCTION, APPROXIMATELY 90 PERCENT
COMPLETED.
PARKING APRON NEAR NEW HANGAR IS
BEING SURFACEO. Z NEW BUILDINGS UNDER
CONSTRUCTION NEAR NORTH END UF RUNWAY.
NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED.
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 149 INCLUDING
2 CRATE, ONE C-47. 7 HOUND CONE KITHOUT
ROTORSI, 3 HARE CONE WITHOUT ROTORS), ONE
UNTDENTIFIED SINGLE ENGINE.
DEFENSES =- NO CHANGE SINCE 2 MAY 62.
RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. 2 NEW BUILDINGS UNDER
CONSTRUCTION NEAR NORTH END OF RUNWAY. NEH
APPEARS TO BE COMPLETED. PARKING AREA
NEAR NEW HANGAR IS BEING SURFACED.
! TROOP CONCENTRATION NOTEO.
SB0221
---
## Page 189
DocId: 326
706
Page
189
6 JUN G2 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- I HARE AND ONE CRATE OBSERVED.
2 BUILDINGS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT
NORTH END OF RUNWAY. HANGAR COMPLETE.
SURFACING CONTINUING ON PARKING APRON.
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES, NO TROOP
CONCENTRATIONS OBSERVED.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION•
3082 SITSUM
..LE JUN 62 REPORTS
APPARENT CHANGE TO FACILITIES.
AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF LA INCLUDING -- 1 C-47
3 HOUND, 3 HARE AND 3 POSSIBLE ZLIN-TRENER
ALSO 2 HARE FUSELAGES. APPROXIMATELY 40
SHIPPING CRATES 120
_ FT SQUARE) •
---
## Page 190
DocId: 32627026
Page
190
SAGUA LA GRANDE EN/GI RADAR, INSTALN U/C
3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS
2.7 NM NNW OF CENTER OF SAGUA LA GRANDE AT
22-58-50N
886-05-42H.
TWO ELEVATEO POSITIONS, 8 LARGE TENTS, 4
MEDIUM AND 6
TENTS,
ANO APPROXIMATELY
12 VEHICLES.
INSTALLATION
•8 NM SE OF THE
SAGUA LA GRANDE SA-2
SITE UNDER
CONSTRUCTION.
CU
22501 080051
---
## Page 191
DocId: 32627026
Page
191
LA
SITE
CU
G- 3088, 29 AUG 52 REPORTS.
NO NEW CONSTRUCTION OR MISSILE ACTIVITY
NOTED WITHIN LO NA RADIUS OF SAGUA LA
GRANDE.
3089 SITSUM S SEP 62 REPORTS
2.9 NM NNW OF SAGUA LA GRANDE AT 22-51-10N
080-05-50W..
SA-2 SAM SITE, STAR CONFIGURATION, UNDER
CONSTRUCTION. SIX LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH
CANVAS/NET-COVERED LAUNCHERS, 3 UNOCCUPIED
MISSILE-HOLD POSITIONS. FRUIT SET RADAR WITH
APPROXIMATELY 6 ASSOCIATED VANS"
POSSIBLE
ACQUISITION RADAR.
APPROXIMATELY
VEHICLES.
2251N
Đ80050
---
## Page 192
DocId: 32627026
Page
192
_ SAN ANTONIO DE LOS BANOS AIRFIELD
CU
2252N
3885 SITSUM 1Z JUL 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 45. INCLUDING 14
FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 PROBABLE MIDGETO 2 FARMERS 2
T-33, ONE LIAISON, ONE HOUND, 3 PROBABLE T-G,
12 B-26 (INCLUDING 2 PROBABLE DERELICTI,
ONE PROBABLE SEA FURY. 5 UNIDENTIFIED
SINGLE-ENGINE FIGHTERS, AND 2 UNIDENTIFIED
12 ADDITIONAL POSSIBLE EMPLACEMENTS
UNDER CONSTRUCTIONI, ONE OCCUPIED
3-GUN POSITION ON WEST SIDE OF NIS
RUNWAY, JUST SOUTH OF RUNWAY
INTERSECTION, ONE 3-GUN PROBABLY
OCCUPIED POSITION ON EAST SIDE OF
MIS TAXIWAY ON WEST SIDE OF FIELD.
ONE OCCUPIEO 3-GUN POSITION AT SOUTH
END OF N/S RUNWAY.
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
CHANGES NOTED FROM MISSION 300Le DEC 61 ARE AS
FOLLOWS•
POSSIBLE GOA EQUIPMENT NEAR SOUTH
END OF NE/SW RUNWAY HAS BEEN REMOVED. FIVE AW
POSITIONS AT WEST END OF NEISW RUNWAY. THREE
-AN POSITIONS AT NORTH END OF NWISE RUNWAY.
ONLY 2 POSITIONS REMAIN OF THE & GUN AAA AT NE
END OF NE/SW RUNWAY: ONE SMALL REVETTEO
CORRUGATEO HANGAR AT WEST END OF NE/SW RUNWAY•
SMALL CORRUGATED HANGARS: ALONG HARDSTAND
OFF TAXIWAY PARALLELING NE/SW RUNWAY ON
NORTH SIDE.
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 50 INCLUDING 21 FAGOT/
FRESCO, ONE FARMER, 12 8-26, ONE AERO
COMMANDER, 3 T-33, ONE HOUND, 11 UNIDENTIFIED
DEFENSES -- ONE UNOCCUPIED AAA SITE ADJACENT
TO SW END OF NE/SW RUNWAY.
NO CHANGE
IN FACILITIES SINCE MAR 6ZO NO
68231N
€ 20.21
---
## Page 193
DocId: 32627026
Page
193
SECURITY NOTEO.
TOKEN EW/GCI UNIT SOUTH OF SE END OF NWISE.
RUNWAY.
AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES OBSERVED.
NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED.
3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 6Z REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 45. INCLUDING --
15 FRESCO/FAGOTS, ONE FARMER+ 10 B-261
2 DERELICT B-260 7 UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE
ENGINE, 5 LIAISON, 3 T-33, ONE HOUND, ONE
AEROCOMMANDER•
NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES, RADAR, AND OTHER
FACILITIES SINCE 2 MAY 62O NO TROOP
CONGENTRATION OR AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES
OBSERVED. NO SECURITY NOTED. FIVE NEW
COVEREO REVETMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION,
2 ALONG AW/SE RUNWAY, 2 ON NORTH SIDE OF
NE/SH RUMWAY, AND ONE ON SOUTH SIDE OF
NE/SW RUNWAY.
3000 SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 53, INCLUDING 21 FAGOTT
MIDGET, 2 FARMER, 10 B-269 2 DERELICT B-26, 4
T-33, 6 PROBABLE SEA FURY, I LIAISON,
ONE HOUND.
4 AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES.
THE 5 NEW, COVEREO AIRCRAFT REVEMENTS ARE
STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
NO TROOP CONCENTRATION OBSERVED.
NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MAY 62.
3082 SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO CHANGE TO FACILITIES. RUNWAYS SERVICEABLE.
AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 23 INCLUDING -- 14
FAGOT/FRESCO, I FARMER, 2 T-33, 2 B-26 AND
4 LIAISON. INCOMPLETE INFO.
= 3983 SITSUM 29 JUN 82 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 37, INCLUDING
2 FARMER, 14 FAGOT/FRESCO, 11 B-26, 2 T-33,
ONE HELICOPTER, 3 LIAISON, 3 UNIDENTIFIED
SINGLE-ENGINE, ONE DERELICT B-26, AND
NUMEROUS OTHER DERELICTS IN SCRAP PILE.
RUNHAYS SERVICEADLE. THE 5 NEW COVERED
REVETMENTS ARE STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
---
## Page 194
NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES OR DEFENSES SINCE
MAY 620
3084 SITSUM 8 JUL 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 37e INCLUDING 12 B-269
3 LIAISONe ONE UNIDENTIFIED
SINGLE-ENGINE STRAIGHT-WINGE AND
5 AIRCRAFT FUSELAGESE 2 WITH WINGS
AND NO TAILe 3 WITHOUT WINGS.
RUNWAYS CLEAR AND SERVICEABLE, 800 FT
EXTENSION TO NIS RUNWAY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
TWO POSSIBLE 24 FI GRATES NEAR WAREHQUSES.
NO RADAR OR OTHER ELECTRONIGS NOTED.
DEFENSES INCLUDE ONE G-GUN AA POSITION
CONE POINT OCCUPIED) AT
SW END OF NEISW RUNWAY,
UNOCCUPIED 3- GUN POSITION SW OF
6-GUN POSITIONS ONE OCCUPIED 4-GUN
POSITION NW OF INTERSECTION OF RUNWAYS,
SINGLE-ENGINE TRAINERS• 5 AIRCRAFT SHIPPING
CRATES, 30 FI IN LENGTH.
NO CHANGE IN AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS, FACILITIES.
OR DEFENSES SINCE EARLY JUL 62. TOKEN RADAR
IN PLACE.
3086
SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS
•AIRCRAFT --
TOTAL OF 440 INCLUDING 12
=:B-26, 2 FARMER,
17 FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 PROBABLE
T-33, 5 UNIDENTIFIEO SINGLE-ENGINE*
3 PROBABLE T-DO AND 3 LIAISON.
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
3488 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 30, INCLUDING 16 FAGOT/
FRESCOA 2 POSSIBLE MIDGET. 12 B-26 12
• ONE AERO COMMANDER.
ENGINE PISTON• 10 PROBABLE AIRCRAFT
REVETMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION NE CORNER OF
AIRFIELD. 9 PROBABLE AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION SE CORNER OF AIRFIELD.
Dockd: 32627026: Page 194
---
## Page 195
# 1
SAN JULIAN AIRFIELD SAM SITE
* G-30889 29 AUG 62 REPORTS.
•2 NM SE OF SAN JULIAN AIRFIELD RUNWAY
INTERSECTION AT 22-05-28N 084-08-58W•
SA-Z SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SIX
LAUNCHERS• 6 CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE
TRAILERSO G VANSA AND 9 TENTS• FIVE
LAUNCHERS IN PROCESS OF BEING REVETTED.
CENTRAL GUIDANCE AREA CONTAINING VANS
PROBABLE FRUIT SET RADAR IS REVETTED.
CU 2205N 08409W
DocId: 32627026
Page 195
---
## Page 196
SANCTI SPIRITUS SAM SITE
CU 2147N 07929W
SOVIET SHIPS APPARENTLY UNLOADED AT CASILDA AND
THEIR CARGOS TRANSPORTED THROUGH TRINIDAD
DIRECTION OF SANCTI SPIRITUS. DESTINATION MAY BE THE
SANTA CLARA AIR BASEO
G- 38880 29 AUG 62 REPORTS.
NO UNUSUAL CONSTRUCTION OR MISSILE ACTIVITY
NOTED • INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
• 3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS
6.5 N# SSW OF SANCTI SPIRITUS AT 21-47-45N
079-29-30W.
UNREVETTED SA-Z SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
STAR CONFIGURATIONS SIX LAUNCH POSITIONS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND 6 TRANSPORTERS WITH
CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERSO 11 VEHICLES IN
GUIDANCE AREA• THREE TENTS AND ID VEHICLES
NEARBY.
DecId: 32627026
Page 196
---
## Page 197
SANCTI SPIRITUS - CIENFUEGOS HIGHWAY
CU 2156N 87926H
HIGHWAY FROM SANCTI SPIRITUS (2I5GN-B7926W) TO
SANTA CLARA (2225N-27957W) TO CIENFUEGOS
(2209N-08027H) •
3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS
CONVOY TRAVELING NWO 4.5 NM SE OF PLACETAS.
CONSISTING OF 5 LOWBOY TRACTOR-TRAILERS EACH
WITH ONE POSSIBLE CANVAS-COVERED TANK. TWO
OTHER TRUCKS TOWING UNIDENTIFIED EQUIPMENT•
HIGHWAY FROM SANTA CLARA TO CIENFUEGOS --
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION:
DocId: 32627026
Page 197
---
## Page 198
u301L1
SANTA CLARA AREA SEARCH
SOVIET SHIPS APPARENTLY UNLOADED AT CASILDA AND
THEIR CARGOES TRANSPORTED THROUGH TRINIDAD IN
DIRECTION OF SANTA CLARA. DESTINATION MAY BE THE SANTA
3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62
REFORTS
NO MISSILE-RELATEO ACTIVITY NOTED.
MILITARY INSTALLATION 2•3 NM SSE OF CENTER
OF SANTA CLARA CONSISTS OF ONE LARGE
H-SHAPED BUILDING, ONE 3- SECTION
ADMINISTRATIVE-TYPE BUILDING. AND & SUPPORT
BUILDINGS• APPROXIMATELY 9 VEHICLES.
AREA FENCED.
FIELO ARTILLERY
TRAINING AREA 3.9 NM SW OF
CENTER OF TOWN CONSISTING. OF THREE AREAS
AS FOLLONS -- AREA LA 18 FIELD ARTILLERY
EMPLACENENTS, 18 PRIME MOVERS 112 HAVE
PROSABLE HOWITZERS ATTACHEDI. AREA 2.
BARRACKS AREA WITH AT LEAST 8
BARRACKSO
SEVERAL SMALL SUPPORT BUILDINGS.:
SMALL TRENCHES, AND SMALL ARMS EMPLACEMENTS:
AREA 3A NO ACTIVITY OBSERVED.
TANK TRAINING AREA 4.7 NM SSE OF CENTER OF
TOWN -- APPROXIMATELY 18 CANVAS COVERED
PROBABLE TANKSA 12 SUPPORT BUILOINGS, AT
LEAST 15 EXCAVATIONS FOR TANK TRAINING.
GU 2225N 07957H
Daisin
DocId: 32627026
Page 198
---
## Page 199
SANTA CLARA MILITARY AREAS
3080 SITSUM
& JUN 62 REPORTS
2•5 NH SH OF SANTA CLARA.
MILITARY COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 4 SEPARATE
INSTALLATIONS - AL TRAINING AREA AT
22-23-15N 080-08-45H CONTAINS & SUPPORT
BUILDINGS (EA X 20 FTIO
8 UNOCCUPIED FA
POSITIONS Y TRUCKS AND 5 AUTOS.
B) TRAINING AREA AT 22-22-09N 080-04-156
CONTAINS 6 SUPPORT BUILDINGS 190 X 15 FT/P
18 UNOCCUPIEO FA POSITIONS, AND 26 TRUCKS.
C) BARRACKS AREA AT 22-23-DON 08A-01-20W
CONTAINS 18 BUILDINGS, INCLUDING ONE
ADMINISTRATIVE:
6 BARRACKS,
2 ADMINISTRATIVE/
SUPPORT BUILDINGSA 5 PROBABLE ADMINISTRATIVE/
BARRACKS BUILDINGS, AND 29 TRUCKS.
O1 VEHICLE PARK AREA AT
20-22-30N
680-09-554
CONTAINS 7 BUILDINGS, 8 PRIME MOVERSE
TRUCKS.
CU
2223N
08001W
Roe Id: 32627026
Page 199
---
## Page 200
SANTA CLARA MILITARY AREAS
3080 SITSUM
6 JUN 62
REPORTS
2•5 NM SW OF SANTA CLARA.
MILITARY COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 4 SEPARATE
INSTALLATIONS - AL TRAINING AREA AT
22-23-15N
080-00-45K CONTAINS & SUPPORT
BUILDINGS (88 X 20 FIle 8 UNOCCUPIEO FA
POSITIONS, Y TRUCKS AND S AUTOS.
TRAINING AREA AT 22-22-09N 080-00-15W
CONTAINS & SUPPORT BUILDINGS 190 X 15 FTI.
18 UNOCCUPIEO FA POSITIONS, AND 26 TRUCKS.
BARRACKS AREA
AT 22-23-DON 088-01-20W
CONTAINS L8 BUILDINGS, INCLUDING ONE
ADMINISTRATIVE, 6 BARRACKS, 2 AOMINISTRATIVE/
SUPPORT BUILDINGS, 5 PROBABLE ADMINISTRATIVE/
BARRACKS HUILDINGS, AND 29 TRUCKS.
D) VEHICLE
PARK AREA AT 20-22-30N
080-49-554
CONTAINS..
TRUCKS.
I BUILDINGS, 8 PRIME MOVERSE
AND 22
CU 2223N
08201W
DocId: 32627026 Page 200
---
## Page 201
SANTA CLARA, MILITARY INSTALLATION
CU
222214
0795711
3078 MCI 2 MAY UZ REPORTS
SANTA CLARA, MILITARY INSTALLATION
NO CHANGE SINCE MISSION 3071, 15 MAR 62•
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 20 TANKS.
NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED.
308A SITSUM
6 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE APR 61.
NO VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT OBSERVED•
3985 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
ONE NM SE UF SANTA CLARA.
NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE APR 610
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 3 TRUCKS.
* 3088 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS
NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE SINCE JUNE 62.
TANK TRAINING AREA AT 22-20N 879-56W 5 NM
SW OF SANTA CLARA. NO VEHICLES OBSERVED. NO
CHANGE IN FACILITIES.
DOcId: 32627026
Page 201
---
## Page 202
SANTA CLARA AREAR TANK TRAINING
CỤ 2220N R7956H
3879 SITSUM 22 MAY O2 REPORTS
NO MAJOR CHANGES SINCE JAN 62• NO
ACTIVITY
OBSERVED• NO TROOP CONCENTRATION•
MILITARY EQUIPMENT -- 13 TANKS, AND 7 SPS
IN TANK TRAINING AREA•
38BO SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS
NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES
• SINCE MAY 62.
13 TANKS IN AREA:
• 3883 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS
VEHICLES - 14 TANKS. 7 PROBABLE
PROPELLED GUNSA
ONE TRUCK. AND 2
SMALL
VEHICLES, POSSIBLY JEEP-TYPE.
AT LEAST 18 SUPPORT BUILDINGS AND
20 DUG-IN
TANK SHELTERS/POSITIONS.
3985 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS
5 NM SSE OF SANTA CLARA.
NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62.
VENICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 16 TANKSe 3 PROBABLE
SELF-PROPELLED GUNS.
S20051
DocId: 32627026. Page 202
---
## Page 203
SANTA CRUZ DE LOS PINOS, MILITARY ENCAMPMENT
CU
3191 SITSUM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS
2 NM NNH OF SANTA CRUZ DE LOS PINOS AT 22-42-35N
083-08-151.
MILITARY ENCAMPMENT LOCATEO IN A WOODEO AREA CONTAINS
AT LEAST 7 BUILDINGS, 14 LARGE TENTS, 15 SMALLER
TENTS, AND 75 VEMICLES, INGLUDING A CONVOY IN
THE AREA•
EQUIPMENT.
AREA APPEARS TO BE UNDER DEVELOPMENT•
2242N 08308W
1-21
DocId: 32627026
Page 203
---
## Page 204
033.1
SANTA CRUZ DEL NORTE CRUISE-MISSILE SITE
6-32388 29 AUG 62 REPORTS •
• 9 NM WSS OF SANTA CRUZ DEL NORTE AT
23-49-02N 861-56-2810
SA-2 SAM SITE IN AN EARLY STAGE OF
CONSTRUCTION• GUIDANCE POSITION WITH CABLE
TRENCHING EXTENDING TO INTENDED LAUNCH
POSITIONS• UNE UNOCCUPIEO LAUNCH POSITION.
PARKING AREA CONTAINS 12 MISSILE
TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERSE
SET RADARE A MISSILE LAUNCHERS, AT
LEAST 12 VANS AND NUMEROUS TRUCKS.
CU 2309N
PREVIOUSLY REPORTED AS AN SA-Z (SAM SITER NOW
HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS AN INSTALLATION SIMILAR
TO ONE AI BANES IN ORIENTE PROVINCES WHICH IS BELIEVED
TO BE A CRUISE-TYPE COASTAL DEFENSE MISSILE SITE.
DocId: 32627026
Page 204
---
## Page 205
# 1
SANTA LUCIA ALTERNATE SAM SITE
CU 2243N 08349W
304888
29 AUG 62 REPORTS LOCATED 8.4 NM NE OF SANTA
LUCIA AT 22-43-48N1
083-49-50W• EQUIPMENT OBSERVED,
6 UNREVETTEO LAUNCH
POSITIONS WITH LAUNCHERS, 6
CANVAS
COVERED MISSILE TRAILERS.
FRUITSET RADAR,
APPROX 20 VEMICLES, AND & TENTS. STAR CONFIGURATION.
310L SITSUM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.
DocId: 32627026
Page 205
---
## Page 206
SANTA FE AREA, MILITARY ACTIVITY
CU 2143N 08249W
3078 MC1 2 MAY 62
REPORTS
LARGE MILITARY TRAINING
COVERING
APPROXIMATELY 1A SO MI: 4 NM SW OF SANTA FE.
AREA CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 7
BARRACKS,
PROBABLE MESS HALL, A SUPPORT
BUILDINGS.
NUMEROUS SMALL BUILDINGS SCATTERED THROUGHOUT
THE AREA, 3 REVETTEO AMMUNITION STORAGE
BUILDINGS, 2 FIRING RANGES. NUMEROUS
ENTRENCHMENTS, GUN POSITIONS, VEMICLE
REVETMENTS, DUG-IN TANK POSITIONS
AND TRACK
ACTIVITY SCATTERED THROUGHOUT AREA.:
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 12 TRUCKS,
PROBABLE PERSONNEL CARRLERSe AND 5
MISCELLANCOUS VEHICLES.
DooId: 32627026
Page 206
---
## Page 207
SANTIAGO DE CUBAS MILITARY CAMP
3ALO 11 DEC GO REPORTS
CENTER OF CITY. L LARGE
QUILDING WITH 6
W1MG58.
4 OTHER LARGE BUILDINGS.
22 PROBABLE
PARKACKS.
17 BUSES, APPROXIMATELY 35
TRUCKS..
AND
LE AUTOMOBILES IN CAMP
AREdO
NO OEFENSES
COSERVED•
3H6U SITSUM 20 OCT O1 REPORTS
CENTER OF CITY.
ONE LARGE BUILDING WITH 6
WINGS, " OTHER LARGE QUILDINGS, 24 PROSAULE
BARRACKS. 15 BUSESA 8 TRUCKS....
AND
AUTOMOBILES IN CAHP AREA• NO DEFENSES
OBSERVED®
CU 28014 475490
DOCId: 32627026
Page 207
---
## Page 208
SANTIAGO DE CURA AREA, MILITARY CAMP
CU
2003N
075546
3478 MCI
APPROXIHATELY B IN UNW OF SANTIAGO DE CUBA
ON ROUTE 6-52. MILITARY CAMP AT 20-43-15N
SHE CAR 4 20 05 5
975-53-30H INCLUDES
T BARRACKS.
ONE
ADMIRISTRATIVE BUILDING,
O SUPPORT BUTLOINGS,
& FA POSITIONS, AND NUMEROUS AW
LAPLACEMENTS.
Doatd: 32627026
Page
208
---
## Page 209
SANTIAGO DE CUUA, MILITARY TRAINING AREA
CU
2842N
87550W
307B ICE 2 MAY O2 REPORTS
MILITARY
TRAINING AREA AT THE
SANTIAGO DE
CUBA AIRFIELD. FACILITIES
INCLUDE 4 LARGE BUILDINGS, 6
SMALL BUILDINGSa
NUMEROUS WEAPON EMPLACEMEN.
H-SHAPED BUTLDING WITHIN A FENCED AREA.
NO AÁA POSITIONS OBSERVED IN VICINITY.
VEHICLES -= QUE GARD ONE TRUCKS MOBILE CRANE.
DodId: 32627026
Page 209
---
## Page 210
SANTIAGO DE CUBA, PROBABLE ANA SITE
3045 23
APR GI REPORTS
105 NM WEST OF SOUTH END OF AIRFIELD,
AT
SANTIAGO DE CURA.
OCCUPIEO LIGHT
AA
POSITIONS SCATTERED IN AN OPEN FIELD.
VEHICLES.-
3 TRUCKSO ONE POSSIOLE CONTROL
CU 2002N 07549W
Docrd: 32627026 • Page 210
---
## Page 211
SANILAGO DE LAS VEGAS SAM ASSEMBLY AREA
CU 2257N
68221W
6-30880 29 AUG 62 REPORTS•
2 MiT ESE
SANTIAGO DE LAS VEGAS AT
22-57-408
002-21-30V.
POSSIBLY AN INTERIM SAM ASSENBLY AREA
COMTAINING 34 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS 1Ó OF
WHICH ARE CANVAS-COVEREDI, S MISSILE
DULLIESI
12 PROCABLE GUIDELINE MISSILES,
_PIECES OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND
APPROXIMAIELY 35 MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES.
EXTENSIVE
OPEN STORAGE.
MANOLINGA STORAGE, AND CHECKOUT FACILITIES
NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH SOVIET-TYPE
SUPPORT FAGILITIES WERE NOT OBSERVED.
(0)
DocId: 32627026
Page 211
---
## Page 212
SENADO SAM SITE
3109
7 OCT 62 REPORTS
4ol NM NNE OF
SERADO
ARD LINE WNE OF NUEVITAS AT
21-36-36N 477-33-31H.
SA-2 SAM
SITE,
UNREVETTED AND PROBABLY UNDER
CONSTRUCTIONe
CONTAINING
THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES AND
EQUIPMENT
6 PROBABLE CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE
LAUNCHERS EMPLACEDO POSSIBLE FRUTI SET RADAR AND
APPROXIMATELY O ASSOGIATED VANS IN GUIDANCE AREA.
MISSILE-HOLD POSITIONS EACH WITH Z MASSILE
TRANSPORTERS?
APPROXIMATELY 15 ADDITIONAL VEMICLES
AND APPROXIMATELY & TENTSO SITE HAS A LINK
CONFIGURAI101.
Cu 2136N
07733W
Do Ta: 32627026
Page 212
---
## Page 213
STERRA DEL ANAFE MILITARY CAMP
CU 2257N 03238W
3078 101
2 MAY 62 REPORTS
ON STERRA DEL ANAFE AT 22-57-20N 882-38-00W.
FACILLTLES INCLUDE
13 MISCELLANEOUS EUILOINGSO
SMEOSO S VEHIGLE REVETMENTSA
SHALL ARMS
KÁNGER A POSSIOLE INFILTRATION RANGE AT SOUTH
EDGE OF CAMP, ONE 3-GUN AW POSITION 105 N4
NW OF CANPA ONE 3-GUN AAN POSITION IUMEDIATELY
FASI OF CAMP2 A PARRACKS/SUPPORT AÑEA
CONTALNING 24 BUILDINGS ONE NN NORTH OF CAMP.
OME G-GUN OCCUPIEO FA POSITION 1.2 NM NV OF
CAIMITO.
ONE G-GUN OCCUPIEO FA
POSITION 1.4
NO:TH OF CAIMITO.
6-GUN AAA POSITION 203 NM NW
OF CAMP.
THE NE OE
OTHER
POSITION LOCATED TO
CACIP•
0-GUR
DocId: 32627026
Page 213
---
## Page 214
SIGUANCA GOAT BASIN
CU
= 3101 SITSUM
14. 061 62 REPORTS
104 No She 0F
SIGUANEA•
VESSELS
ONE
PATROL
FRIGATE AND ONE PROBABLE PATROL
CRAFTO IACOMPLETE
INFORMATION•
2137N
98258W
DocId: 32627026
Page 214
---
## Page 215
SIGUANGA CRUISE-HISSILE SITE
A CRUISE MISSILE SITE MIC HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED
ON THE ISLE OF PINES 1 NM SSW OF SIGUANEA
AIRFIELD
AT 21-37-25N 002-50-15W
IT IS SITUATED •I NH
INLANDA
HILLTOP, ON THE EAST COAST OF THE
RAY OF SIGUANEA.
THE SITE IS SIMILAR TO THOSE OBSERVED AT BANES
SANTA CRUZ DEL NORTE IN BOTH SITE CONFIGURATION
ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
THE SITE CONSISTS OF TWO
INCLINED LAUNCHERS APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET APART.
ORIENTED 200 DEGREES AND 240 DEGREES RESPECTIVELY.
RUTH LAUNCHERS
ARE CONNECTED BY CABLE TO A
PROBABLE WHIFF RADAR AND ANOTHER UNIOENTIFIED TYPE
RADARO
BOTH RADARS APPEAR TO BE NETTED. TO THE
REAR OF THE LAUNCHERS ANO AT THE FOOT OF THE MILL
ARE SEVEN MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, FIVE ARCH-ROOFED
VANS
ONE CRADE
AND SEMORAL PROBACLE TRUCKS •
CU 2137N
28258W
DocId: 32627026
Page 215
---
## Page 216
SIGUANEA SAL SITE
CU 213791
3295 SITSUM
29 SEP 62 REPORTS •E NM SOUTH OF SWEND
OF
SIGUANEA
AIRFIELO RONNAY?
AT 21-37-33N 882-57-33k•
SIX LAUNCHERS. 2 OF WHICH ARE IN OSTYE-THROUGH
REVETKENES AND 4 UNREVETTER• FRUIT SET RADAR AND
4SS061A20
VANS
INSTALLEDO
CABLES EXTENO FROli
QUIDANCE RAGAR
TO ALL LAUNCHERS. AT LEAST T MISSILE
TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERS PAKKED
APPROXIMATELY
..S NN SOUTH OF
CIRCULAR ROAD AND
SACURITY FENCE UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
88257k
DocId: 32627026
Page 216
---
## Page 217
TRINIDAD AREA, POSS MIL HEAOQUARTERS
CU 2150N
07953W
3078 MC1
2 MAY S& REPORTS
NO CHANGE
SINCE LASSION 3071%
1SMAK
62.
EXCEPT 3 POSSIELE
GUN EMPLACCMENTS
CONSTRUCTION JUST LAST OF & PREVIOUSLY
REPORTEO
EMPLACEMENTS• POSSIOLE MILITARY:
HCADQUARTERS AREA, •O NM NORTH OF SUN
EMPLACEMENTS, CONSISTING OF MAIN BUILDING
AND 8 MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS LOCATED AT
021-5QN.
CHICLES/EQUIPMENT
-- APPROXIMATELY & TRUCKS.
DooId: 32627026
Page 217
---
## Page 218
VICTORIA: DE LAS TUNAS AREA, MILITARY DEFENSES
3045 23 APR 61 REPORTS
ZOl NM ENE OF VICTORIA DE LAS TUMASO
NUMEROUS TRENCHESE AFPPOXIMATELY 2O OP
SUN POSITIONS AND & MEDIUM/HEAVY GUN
P0s17l0Nee
ALL PROBABLY UNOCCUPIED.
CU 2059N 076541
DocTa: 32627026
Page 218
---
## Page 219
TERBA GUINEAR SUSPECT MISSILE AREA
CU ZE06N 07532W
MATERIAL UNLOADED AT SANGS REPORTED TAKEN TO YERBA
GUINEA.
3055
SITSUM 2 FEB 02
REPORTS
NO MISGILE ACTIVITY OESERVED.
MILITARY
TRAINING AREA WITH I2 SUPPORE
QUILDINGS FRA EMPLACEMENTS,
TRACK ACTIVITY.
VEHICLE REVEMENTS AND 5 PRO@ADLE PRIME
MOVERS.
3093
SITSUM 24 SEP 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE-RELATED
ACTIVITY NOTED.
NO CONVOYSE MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS?
NEM CONSTRUCTION, OR SECUREE AREAS GOGERVED O
DocId: 32627026
Page 219
---
## Page 220
SECRET
ANNEX L
REVIEW OF NIE'S AND SNIE'S
This annex reviews the formal National Intelligence Estimates
and Special National Intelligence Estimates published prior to
14 October 1962 on the Cuban problem.
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 13526, SEC. 3.5
NLK-10-120
BYMAD NARA, Date 3/3
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
220
---
## Page 221
SECRET
Review of NIE's and SNIE's on Cuba
Through 14 October 1962
1. SNIE 80-62, "The Threat to US Security Interests in the
Caribbean Area, " Dated 17 January 1962.
This estimate was done before there was
any evidence of a build-up
of sophisticated weapons in Cuba, but the possibility was explored that the
Soviets might consider establishing "missile,
submarine, or air bases
designed to bring North America under attack or to add to the deterrents
to any conceivable U.S. military action in the Caribbean or elsewhere."
The estimators concluded, on the basis of their understanding of past
Soviet policy and of the risks the Soviets would perceive, that a Soviet
move to establish
such bases was unlikely for some time to come. They
pointed out that the Soviets in the past had been careful to retain control
over situations which involved them in
any serious degree of risk. Finally,
they pointed out that such a move would be inconsistent with their purposes
in Latin America. Nevertheless, they noted that the USSR could and pro-
bably would augment its naval, air, and communications capabilities in
the area by arrangements not openly identifiable as Soviet bases.
2. NIE 85-62, "'The Situation and Prospects in Cuba," dated 21 March 1962.
This estimate was designed to present a detailed picture of develop-
ments within Cuba and of Soviet activities there. The authors noted the
steady communization of Cuba and the complexity of Soviet and Cuban
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 221
---
## Page 222
SECRET
Communist relations with Castro. They found no evidence of a Soviet
intention to develop Cuba into a strategic base nor of any change in the
Soviet policy of spreading communism in Latin America by encouraging
and supporting Communist and non-Communist revolutionaries.
They
took account of the military equipment already in Cuba. An examination
of this armament, however, led them to point out "that Bloc military
deliveries to Cuba to date have been such as to enhance Cuba's capabilities
for defense against external attack and for the maintenance of internal
security rather than to contribute to the development of an independent
offensive military capability.". They added, "The Bloc has provided no
strategic weapon systems."
The estimators then made the judgment that the. Bloc would be
unlikely to provide Cuba with air, missile, or naval capabilities suitable
for independent operations overseas, or to station Bloc combat units in
Cuba.
They did not believe, however, that this would preclude liberal
provision of Bloc military advisers and technicians, or the provision of
such defensive weapons and equipment as surface-to-air missiles and
radars, or a token number of IL-28 jet light bombers.
Thus the intelligence community took into account the possibility
of the build-up of SAM's and IL-28's and. of Soviet military personnel which
did in fact take place in August and September. What the estimators thought
unlikely, along with an independent Cuban offensive capability, was the
..?::..
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 222
---
## Page 223
SECRET
deployment to Cuba of Soviet combat units and of strategic weapons under
Soviet control.. They thought this because they believed that the Soviets
were aware of the geographic advantages which the U. S. would enjoy in
any military confrontation in the neighborhood of Cuba and that they
would estimate that there would be a high risk of U. S. intervention to
prevent the establishment of an offensive base there. They estimated that
the Soviets would not wish to bring on a confrontation with the U. S. under
unfavorable circumstances and with attendant risks of general war. They
were
also impressed by the political and psychological importance of the
Soviet position in Cuba and by the prospect that it could be used to effect
the spread of communism in Latin America. They could see no reason for
the USSR to risk that position by inviting U. S. intervention.
3. NIE 85-2-62, "The Situation and Prospects in Cuba, " dated 1 August 1962.
The analysis of Soviet relations with Castro noted the concessions,
both political and economic, which the Soviets had made to Castro in order
to maintain their position in Cuba. The estimators saw no indication,
however; of a change in the over-all Soviet posture toward the U. S. and
Latin America..
After a careful examination of previous Bloc military shipments.to
Cuba, they concluded that the effect of the shipments was still "to enhance
Cuba's capabilities: for defense against external attack"' and maintain Cuba's
internal security, but that they did not provide an offensive capability. They
- 3 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 223
---
## Page 224
SECRET
went on to estimate that the Bloc would limit its military assistance to
Cuba in this way, although they said again that such a policy would
not
preclude provision of more advanced jet fighters, surface-to-air missiles,
IL-28 bombers, and the liberal
provision of Bloc technicians.
Once again the estimators took into account the possibility of the
build-up that was to take place in August and September, and once again
they deemed
it unlikely that the USSR would develop a strategic base.
Their reasons were as before. The evidence on Soviet policy toward the
U. S. and Latin America in general remained as it had been. They believed
the Soviets were fully aware of the risks inherent in the deployment of
strategic weapons.
Furthermore the military build-up in Cuba continued
to be marked by the absence of air and sea lift which would have given Castro
a capability for attacking his neighbors and by the absence of strategic
weapon systems.
NIE 85-2-62 was completed and passed by USIB before intelligence
had become available on the military build-up that began in the last days of
July. During the month of August, evidence on the progress of the build-up
accumulated. By the end of the month it had become possible to piece. to-
gether from a mass of ground reports a picture which included the deploy-
ment of SAM's and the arrival of large numbers of Bloc personnel under
military discipline.
It was not until 29 August and 5 September, however,
that aerial surveillance provided a clear picture of this: build-up. SNIE: 85-3-62
was then written.
- 4 - '
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 224
---
## Page 225
SECRET
4. SNIE 85-3-62, "The Military Build-up in Cuba, " dated 19 September 1962.
The key question to be answered was whether the new build-up
reflected basic changes in Soviet policy. The estimators concluded that it
did not, although it marked a dramatic change of pace. They believed that
the military establishments in Cuba remained essentially defensive in
character and that the Soviets had continued to avoid making an open pledge
to protect Cuba under all circumstances. They saw no evidence to contra-
dict the long established pattern of Soviet concern for the political and
psychological advantages that they gained from their position in Cuba. The
estimators placed their greatest. emphasis.on the.continued belief that the
Soviets recognized that the development of an offensive military base in
Cuba might provoke U. S. military intervention and thus defeat their purpose.
At the same time the estimators observed that the Soviets were
probably still uncertain about their future military program in Cuba and that
they probably intended to test the U. S. and Latin American reaction as they
proceeded with it. They went on to point out that their analysis of Soviet
policy in Cuba was based on an over-all evaluation of Soviet interests and
intentions, as well as on Soviet actions in and with respect to Cuba. While
they had concluded on this basis that Soviet policy remained fundamentally
unaltered, they did not wish to exclude the possibility that Moscow was at
least considering a change in this policy.
Therefore, in SNIE 85-3-62, they
examined not only the Soviet military build-up in Cuba and developments in
that build-up which might follow, but also "the nature and implications of
= 5 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 225
---
## Page 226
SECRET
military assistance which the Soviets. could provide Cuba in the event of
a major change of policy. "
In analyzing the implications of the "current build-up" they pointed
out that some of the new weapons could be used for offensive as well as
defensive purposes, but that the pattern of aid to that date appeared
"clearly designed to strengthen the defenses of the island, thereby pro-
tecting the Communist beachhead in the Western Hemisphere and raising
the price the lJ. S. would have to pay to eliminate it by military action."
They noted that the military establishment in Cuba still lacked a significant
strike capability.
They then examined the possibilities for expansions of the build-up.
They noted that the distinction between offensive and defensive weapons
had become a major issue and that the Soviets were aware that a case could
be made for supplying. "defensive" weapons and that the supply of other
types would pose a challenge to which the U. S. might forcefully respond.
They discussed the various weapons which the Soviets might try to inject
into Cuba while still claiming that their purpose was defensive--IL-28
and TU-16 bombers, SS-1 and SS-2 missiles, submarines and destroyers.
In this connection, the estimators suggested "a modest number of IL-28's"
as a next move in testing U. S. reactions. "Thus," they concluded, "the
Soviets may experiment with a number of further steps in the military
build-up." The Soviet decision to do so, however, would be strongly .......
influenced by their estimate as to whether they could be introduced without
- 6 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page
226
---
## Page 227
SECRET
forceful U. S. intervention.
The estimators next considered the use of Cuba as a Soviet
strategic missile base. They pointed out that Soviet planners might
see some utility in deploying MRBM's and IRBM's to Cuba and in estab-
lishing a submarine base there. Their net judgment, however, was that
the Soviets would not make such deployments, in part because
such
actions would run counter to their policies for the communization of
Latin America,
"but primarily because "they would almost certainly
estimate that this could not be done without provoking a dangerous U. S.
reaction."
-7..=
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
227
---
## Page 228
IOP SEGRET IDEALIST
ANNEX M
INTELLIGENCE JUSTIFICATION FOR U-2 OVERFLIGHTS OF CUBA
Information concerning the U-2 mission of 14 October, consisting of:
The Intelligence Justification
A map showing the planned route and the route actually flown
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 13526, SEC. 3.5
NLK-10-120
BYMAD NARA, Date 12/13
TOP SECRET IDEALIST
DocId: 32627026
Page
228
---
## Page 229
COPY
TOP SECRET IDEALIST
USIB-D-41. 5/25
(COMOR-D-24/20)
5 October 1962
Limited Distribution
UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD
MEMORANDUM FOR THE UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD
SUBJECT: Intelligence Justification for U-2 Overflight of Cuba
The attached COMOR-developed statement of intelligence
justification for U-2 overflight of Cuba will be placed on the agenda
of the 10 October USIB meeting for consideration and approval of the
Board. COMOR-M-105, referenced therein, is available to Board
members through their representatives on the COMOR.
(Signed)
JAMES S. LAY, JR.
Executive Secretary
TCS-13708-62
TOP SECRET IDEALIST
COPY
DOCId: 32627026
Page
229
---
## Page 230
COPY
TOP SECRET IDEALIST
Attachment
USIB-D-41. 5/25
(COMOR-D-24/20)
5 October 1962
MEMORANDUM FOR: United States Intelligence Board
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
Intelligence Justification for
U-2 Overflight of Cuba
COMOR-M-105 (TCS-13368-62)
The attached intelligence justification for U-2 overflight
of Cuba is forwarded for consideration and approval of the
United States Intelligence Board. This proposal should be
considered in conjunction with COMOR-M-105, which summarizes
the capabilities of peripheral reconnaissance.
(Signed)
Lowell E. May
Acting Chairman
Committee on Overhead Reconnaissance
Attachment:
Subject Paper
-2.-
TOP SECRET IDEALIST
TCS-13708-62
COPY
DocId: 32627026
Page 230
---
## Page 231
COPY
TOP SECRET IDEALIST
Attachment
USIB-D-41. 5/25
(COMOR-D-24/20)
INTELLIGENCE JUSTIFICATION FOR U-2 OVERFLIGHTS OF CUBA
1. There is now a pressing and continuing need for up-to-date
intelligence on the progress of the Soviet arms build-up in Cuba. The
very highest levels of the government are dependent upon this intelli-
gence to assist in making policy decisions of immediate and vital
concern to the nation. At the present time, this intelligence can best
be provided, with sufficient timeliness and broadness of scope, by
overflying Cuba with the U-2.
2. The items of most immediate concern are the missile
installations springing up all over the island. SA-2 sites are present
in various stages of construction, including some sites where available
photography shows only the missile hardware present with no actual
construction yet under way (e.g:, Jiguani suspect SAM site). There
are also SSM sites which have been observed on recent coverage of the
eastern end of the island and on the Isle of Pines. Two sites on older
coverage of Cuba have also been re-evaluated as SSM rather than SAM
sites.
The absence of coverage of the western end since August 29,
coupled with the rate of construction we have observed, means that
there may well be many more sites now being built of which we are
unaware.
Ground observers have in several recent instances,
reported sightings of what they believe to be. the SS-4 (SHYSTER) MRBM
in Cuba. These reports must be confirmed or denied by photo coverage.
It is also necessary to know how many KOMAR class PGMG's may be
in service.
3. In addition to the missile threat, on which it is so important
to obtain late date knowledge, we have confirmed the presence of
MIG-21 aircraft in Cuba. Estimates (based on sightings of merchant
shipping with crates which may obtain more disassembled MIG-21's) "
already have been made in figures as high as 36 although we have firm
photo confirmation of only one. We have no way of substantiating
these estimates at the present time other than through overhead
reconnaissance.
4. Given this extensive build-up of arms, the possibility of
U.S. operations in the area cannot be ignored.. To prepare for such
events, the responsible commanders (in the case of overt military
- 3 -
TOP SECRET IDEALIST
TCS-13708-62
DocId: 32627026 Page 231
---
## Page 232
COPY
TOP SECRET INDEALIST
Attachment
USIB-D-41. 5/25
(COMOR-D-24/20)
operations) and organizations (in the case of clandestine or unconventional
operations) require up-to-date intelligence on the areas in which they
may be working. These requirements are secondary to the requirements
outlined in paragraphs 2 and 3 above. But they are nonetheless important
and potentially of even greater importance,
5. The requirements stated above have been translated into a list
of objectives by the COMOR Working Group. This list is maintained
up-to-date on the basis of all-source intelligence and a plot of them as
of 1 October is appended as TAB A for information. The schedule of
satellite missions approved for the remainder of the year will probably
provide some intelligence, but it is not timely enough nor of sufficient
resolution to meet our needs. The next mission will not be till mid-
November, some ll weeks after the last good coverage of some areas.
FIRE FLY may also prove highly useful in covering specific objectives
of limited scope. But the small area coverage obtainable by FIRE FLY
makes it less desirable than the U-2. Tactical reconnaissance using
FR-101/F8U-1P aircraft may also prove feasible. But this is supple-
mentary to a U-2 program, not a substitute therefor. Tactical
reconnaissance can provide detailed photography for technical intelli-
gence purposes, but not the repeated, wide area coverage necessary
to cover the present objectives.
6. There is only one presently available way to meet the require-
ments of the government: frequent and regular U-2 overflights of the
island to the extent that primary objectives as shown in TAB A are
covered once a month..
The COMOR recognizes the increased risk to
the aircraft in light of the SA-2 and MIG-21 aircraft present there.
But it must be stated that the current need is extremely urgent, and
the risk involved should be very thoroughly weighed before this coverage
is denied.
4÷
TOP SECRET IDEALIST
TCS-13708-62
COPY
DocId: 32627026
Page 232
---
## Page 233
DocId: 32627026
Page
233
TAB A of Attachme:
Miami
RECONNAISSANCE OBJECTIVES IN CUBA
SECRET NOFORN
Havana.
Isle of Pines
CUBAR
UNIDENTIFIED - MISSILES
SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SITES
JET FIGHTER FIELDS
NAVAL OPERATING BASES
NAVAL PORTS
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS
SPECIAL AREAS
BEACHES
UNIDENTIFIED INSTALLATIONS
NAS Guanfanamo Bay
TAB A
SECRET NOFORN
### 68-13708-17
---
## Page 234
WARNING
AREA
SAC
By
. WARNING AREA
G
U
L
ROUTE
CIA PLANNED
PROB.
OPERATIONAL
SAM SITE
TARGET AREA
Cayo Inés
de Soto
1...:
La Esperanzà-
San Cayelano
<=
Santa Lucla Fiao
"Niagara®
ir o terracos
•Consolación
det Norte
SIE
Viñales
Matalámbre
•B'S
PINAR DELIRIO
Herradura
Pilotos
Consolación del Sur
Puestade Golpe
PINAR
DEL RÍO
'unta de
a Sierra
San Juan
y Martinez
Êso
_ R Bp
Fr, JULIAN
San Luis
Media Luna?
La Coloma
Punta de
Cartas
10.
I CORTES SAY/IBO
10
¡CAYOS DE SAN FELIPE
ACTUAL
Otozco
+-illagel
00.
Bahía Honda
253₴1
PR 8
Sabanilla
TT San Cristoba
San Die
LOs Palacie
Y Taco Taco
la Caballeria
, Pas
Re:
Ponte de
Vayaniguas -
10:
Punta de
Carraguao
GOLFO.. 1
D.4J
• Cayo de Dios
los hitlid
Punta d
Barcos:
indios
Cabo Frances'"
Ensenade
de lu
PROHIBITED
AREA
SANTA FE LA
de la HABANA / 66
Gp FI
00 Boca de Guanabo
LA HABANA SEX
CAMPO COLUMBIA /65
45
MARIEL
NAS/ 90
00
SANTA FE/30
DOMINGO ROSILLO / 45.
EL NAS / 60
40
Sustita
Cabañas
6 Martes
OHIBITED Ramoi
RE
894
Bauta-C+
PUTION
AREA
GUANARACON-
-JOSE M
_Cotorro
$0o",
Jar
"Tapaste
OSE MA
La C
GUANAIX
•Cayajabos
ARTEMISA
SAN
ANTO NO
DE LOS BAÑOS
Alquiza
50
San Folipe-
Orivioát
Santiago de
las Vegas
/ San José
"Bejucal de las Lajas
°950
9Sar Antonic
de las Vegas
Melena del Sul
andelaria RESTRICTED
-AREA-. Guanimar
—R Bn -
Cayos
•BATISTA
irlos Guzmanes
•Camacho
Surgidero
¿ Rosario
de Batabanó Xv
• Punta!
Cayos
Las Cayamas
Jejenes
ENSENA
(bay)
F
"Si":
LOTEM-O
Punta Gorda
(point)
I
Cayos del Hambre
B
A
T
B
A
N:"Ó
.:Gayo
(islaid
de Mangies
30
40
50
_RiBn
Nueva Gerona
NUEVA GERONA
ISLA
Tistand)
"PIÉLAG
Santa Bárbara okONEL MARTIN BARRERRO/ 60E LOS
DE Santa Fé-50
Los ladios
3017
r PINOS
3 920 C
Cayos Bocas de Alonzo
CANARREOS:
Cayo Tablones f
DocId: 32627026
Page 234
---
## Page 235
SECRET
ANNEX O
Correspondence Between Chairman,
President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
and the Director of Central Intelligence
Regarding the Cuban Arms Build-up
(14 April - 14 October 1962)
E
This
annex contains a copy of a letter from the Chairman,
President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board to the Director
of Central Intelligence requesting a review of the intelligence
community's activities in regard to the Cuban arms build-up
(14 April - 14 October 1962), and the DCI's reply thereto, both
: dated 14 November 1962.
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 235
---
## Page 236
COPY
14 November 1962
Memorandum for: Dr. James Killian
Chairman, President's Foreign
Intelligence Advisory. Board
This is to let you know that your letter of November 14th
asking for a report on the intelligence community's activities
during the 12-month period preceding 14 October 1962, specifically
in regard to Cuba, has been received and will be discussed at the
meeting of the United States Intelligence Board tomorrow.
Addi-
tionally, I have sent copies of it to Secretary Rusk; Secretary
McNamara, Mr. McGeorge Bundy, and the Attorney General for
their information.
I think you realize that it is a sizeable task to be fully
responsive by the time of your next meeting on December 7th.
Although the Central Intelligence Agency is well along toward its
final report, the consolidation of this report with those from other
members of the intelligence community will require some painstaking
and closely-integrated effort.
I will do my best to get my final report to you prior to
your next meeting.
John A. McCone
Director
cc: J. Patrick Coyne
DocId: 32627026
Page
236
---
## Page 237
THE WHITE HOUSE.
WASHINGTON
PRESIDENT'S FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY BOARD
163-8368
November 14, 1952
Dear John:
on benali of the presidentis Board, trasi to express
our appreciation for your submission at our November S meeting
of the memorandum dated Hovenber 7, 1962, Which ned been pre-
pared within the Central intelligence Agency on the subject
"CIA Fandling of
16 October 1562."
the Soviet Build-uo in Cuba, 1 Juy -
The memorandum wich you supplica, ad your comments
to the board, vere an inctructare contribution to our current
review of the intelligence collection and reporting roles
performed by the United states intelligence community with
respect to the vitaily important subject matter invoived.
In furtherance of the Board's review it would be helpiul
in we were supplied with information on ail pertinent aspects
of the total U.S. foreign intelligence effort which was
brought to bean in providing advence information and assess-
ments of the developing ballietic missile canability which
was positively confirmed by means of photographic reconneis-
sance over Cuba on October 14
, 1952.
such infomation will
materially assiso un bond in lus continuing sporaisai oi
our foreion intelligence activities and should racilitate
the consideration of messures fon the purther stranguening
of our intelligence system.
Accordingly, the Board would
lile to bequest a revier on an cli-source, all-agenor basis
of the actions talen and resulis obtsinea
within the intelli-
gence cormunity in providino incelligence coverage, reporting
and estimates of the developing build-un during the
morth perlod preceding Detocen 14, 1962.
It would de appreciated in a report setting fortr the
results of the intelligence communityis revier would include:
(a) an identification of the roguinenente levied on intelli-
¿ence collection elemente of une Government, (o) a resume of
the intelligence infoimation obtained from such sources as
coreion diniomatic nerzonnel, cupen reruzee invernogations.
in-place agent reports, colina, end ELINT auring the period
DocId: 32627026 Page 237
---
## Page 238
2.
referred to above, (o) the scope of distribution given such
and laterally within the
the extent to which such
information was reflected in reports and assessments ero-
vided to policy level officials.
He understand that the Department of Defense is reviewing
Its own Intelligence activities pertaining. to the Cuban
situation, and
this will doubtless be helpful in this matter.
If the results of the intelligence community's review could
be made availabla to the board in time for consideration at
its next meeting on December 7, without materially interferins
with substantive matters of importance,
the board would theresy
be enabled to respond in timely fashion to requests which are
before it.
FOR THE BOARD."
James R. Killian, Jr.
Chairman
Mr. John MeCone
Director of Central
Intelligence
DocId: 32627026
Page 238
---
## Page 239
SECRET
ANNEX P
Request for Contributions to
Intelligence Community Review of
Activities during the Cuban Arms Build-up
(14 April - 14 October 1962)
This annex contains a copy of a memorandum dated
16: November 1962 from the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
to the Department of State, Defense Intelligence Agency, and.
National Security Agency forwarding a format to be followed in
the preparation of their agency's contribution to the study of
community activities during the Cuban arms build-up (14 April
14 October 1962). Copies of General Carter's memorandum were
also furnished the USIB representatives from AEC and FBI as
well as components of CIA participating in the review.
SECRET
DooId:32627026
Page
239
---
## Page 240
SECRET
16 November 1962
MEMORANDUM FOR: The Director of Intelligence and Research,
: Department of State
Director, Defense Intelligence Agency
Director, National Security Agency
REFERENCE
Memorandum for USIB Principals
from the DCI, dated 14 November 1962
1..
Pursuant to the discussion at the Executive Session of the
United States Intelligence Board meeting on 15 November 1962, I
have established a working group in the Central Intelligence Agency
under the chairmanship of the Inspector General of CIA to prepare
the response to the request by the President's Foreign Intelligence
Advisory Board for an all-agency, all-source review of the intelli-
gence.
activities relating to the Cuban situation,
2.
The Director of Intelligence and Research, Department of
State; the Director, Defense Intelligence Agency; and the Director,
National Security Agency have designated representatives to this
group in order to provide necessary support, research, analysis,
and other staffing required in the preparation of the response.
the seve There is attache ot the guidance of the peration otines os
agency's contribution to the study.
This format has been coordinated
with these representatives.
4:
Copies of this letter and of the format have also been sent
tọ Chairman, Atomic Energy: Commission, and to Director, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, together with requests for any data which
they may be able to supply to aid the study.
SECRET
GROUP 1
Exetuded from automatic
downgrading and
declassification
DooId: 32627026
Page 240
---
## Page 241
SECRET
5. Individual agencies' contributions will be submitted to the
chairman of the working group not later than close of business
23 November 1962.
Mas hasS. Canted
Marshall S. Carter
Lieutenant General, USA
Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
Attachment
CC:
Director J-? (Intelligence)
Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Army
Director, Naval Intelligence
Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Air Force
- 2 -
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
241
---
## Page 242
SECRET
FORMAT FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY'S
REVIEW OF INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES RELATING TO THE CUBAN
ARMS BUILD-UP, 14 APRIL THROUGH 14 OCTOBER 1962
The main headings under which information is desired from
each contributing agency are as follows:
A. COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS
B. COLLECTION FACILITIES
C. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION-- THE SUBSTANCE
D. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION--ITS DISSEMINATION
E. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION--PROCESSING
F. THE INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT
G. USE OF THE INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT
H. PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY COORDINATION
Under these general headings each agency is asked to supply
the following information:
SECRET
DocId: 32627026.
Page
242
---
## Page 243
SECRET
A. COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS
I. At the beginning of the period under review, what were the
requirements on Cuba and on Soviet Bloc activities with respect to
Cuba, as levied upon the agency?
2. At the beginning of the period, what were the agency's own
internal requirements for intelligence on Cuba and on Soviet Bloc
activities with respect to Cuba? How were these requirements
generated?
3. How long had the requirements in 1. and 2., above, been
in effect? Had there been any significant recent changes? If so;
what?
4. What significant changes in requirements were introduced
during the period? I internally produced, how were they generated?
5. How were the requirements in I., 2., and 4., above, trans-
mitted to the agency's collection facilities? What, if any, requirements
were referred to other collecting agencies?
6. What role did the agency play in the generation of community.
requirements?
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 243
---
## Page 244
SECRET
B. COLLECTION FACILITIES
1. What are the nature and scope of the agency's collection facilities
With respect to the Cuban situation? (For example: Cuban or third-countiy
agents or informants in Cuba; legal travelers; Cuban of third-country.
diplomats; refugees; liaison services; analysis of overt press and radio;
COMINT, ELINT; photography -- specify means and available targets.)
2. Please describe any new facilities which were created -- or
existing facilities which were expanded or redirected during the period
or shortly before -- which contributed significantly to the agency's col-
lection effort.
3. What targets was the agency able to cover and with what frequency
and continuity?
4 Within the terms of the agency's mission, what targets was it
unable to cover, and why?
5.! What, if any, significant changes, either positive or negative,
in the agency's coverage capability, took place during the period?
6. What support for collection facilities was required from other
agencies? How was it secured from them? Was it timely and effective?
What, if anything, was lacking?
SECRET
DocId: 32627026 Page 244
---
## Page 245
SECRET
C. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION
- THE SUBSTANCE
Please submit the following data on all intelligence information
relating to the Cuban arms build-up which was collected by the
agency during the period:
1, Abstracts of all raw reports bearing significantly on the
build-up.
2.: For each such abstract please note:
a. Serial number of report.
b. Date of information.
c. • Date of dissemination.
d. Brief source description.
e. Source grade.
f. Content appraisal.
g. To whom disseminated.
3. Please make special note of any such raw reports which the
agency. considered to be of particular significance at the time of
receipt. Also please note any which, though not specially noted at
the time of receipt, the light of subsequent events has shown to be
of importance.
SECRET
DooId: 32627026 Page 245
---
## Page 246
SECRET
D: INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION -- ITS DISSEMINATION
I. Please provide, in detail, the standard dissemination which
applies to most of the agency's reports. When, how, and for what
reasons is this dissemination varied?
2. How are reports originating with your agency distributed
in the community?
3. How are reports originating outside your agency dissemin-
ated within the agency?
4. Please provide a narrative statement on the flow of intel-.
ligence information significantly concerned with the arms build-up
in: Cuba, both within your agency and from your agency to other
community elements.
5. Please
select a particularly significant report and trace
its progress from the time the information was acquired by the
ultimate source to the time it reached the hands of the customer.
SECRE
DooId: 32627026
Page
246
---
## Page 247
SECRET
E. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION -- PROCESSING
1. Please discuss the analytical process in the agency with
respect to the Cuban arms build-up. Who does the analyzing?
What research facilities of technical analytical tools are brought
to bear? Does this involve support from other agencies? If so,
to what extent? How effective? Any lacks?
2. Do analysts discuss intelligence information with analysts
of other agencies?
If so, do they do it regularly or only on
occasion?. Does such discussion facilitate rapid and effective
analysis?
3.. Please discuss the way the agency uses intelligence
information; both its own product and that of other collecting
agencies, in the preparation of internal intelligence and estimative
publications.
4. To what extent do analysts and estimators discuss intel-
ligence information with personnel engaged in directing collection
operations? Do the analysts and estimators know as much about
the capabilities of collection facilities as they need to in order
to do their job effectively?
5. How is intelligence processed for submission to coordinated
community publications? Who prepares such submissions; and
what is the administrative mechanism employed?
How does it work?
SE
R..
E T
DocId: 32627026 Page 247
---
## Page 248
SECRET
F. THE INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT
1. Please submit the following:
a. Consecutive dated verbatim extracts, dealing with the
Cuban arms build-up, from all of the agency's formal intelli-
gence publications during the period.
b. Two copies of each formal agency estimative publication
dealing with Cuba during the period. Do not include agency
contributions to NIE's or SNIE's.
2. Please describe what other channels, such as oral or
written, were used during the build-up to transmit pertinent
information to policy-level officials.
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page
248
---
## Page 249
"SECRET
G. USE OF THE INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT
1. What unilateral operational use did the agency make of
intelligence or intelligence information received on the build-up?
2. How was such information or intelligence used by the
agency in participation in community meetings (USIB, Special
Group, Watch Committee, NRO, others)?
3.: How and to what extent did the agency contribute to
coordinated action by the community or members thereof
(including action by the agency alone, as directed or permitted
by the community) as a result of intelligence received during the
build-up?
4. Please provide specific instances in which the agency's
intelligence product affected US policy or, together with the
product of other agencies, contributed to it.
DocId: 32627026
Page 249
---
## Page 250
SECRET
H. PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY COORDINATION
1.: Other than as stated under G., above, in what community
publication panels or committees does the agency participate?
2. What elements of the agency are resconsible for such
coordination?
3. How do they participate in this coordination?
4. Please give specific examples, including dates and
contents, of any items of intelligence presented by the agency
which have been withheld from publication, delayed, or signifi
cantly altered by the coordination process. If delayed, how long?
If altered, in what way?
SECRET
DocId: 32627026
Page 250
--- |
|||||||||||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10173-10104.pdf | 104-10173-10104 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 01/01/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CIA FILE ON LOGUINOV, VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH. | 283 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-9 : F27 : 1998.02.16.10:42:12:890107 : NOT BELIEVED RELEVANT (NBR). | 283 | ## Page 1
104-10173-10104
•ASSIFICO MESSAGE
Z24 SECRET
D
SiT. 10 8016640
O11.
MEXICO CITY
WH8
N RID COPY
I VR, CI, CT/ORS, FI, SRS, CIRCL, CT/CA
-?.
SECRET 071903Z
DIR SITE MEXI 3831
72546029099
REDCOAT LCIMPROVE LICANNY-I
REF A HMMY 12821 AUD 64 filed 201-202:37
MEXT 5372 NOV 63(099634 7
1, DURING ROUTINE CONTACTS WITH POSWING OFFICER DURING JAN
• SURJ ADVISED ME IN CONTACT, PAVEL YATSKOV (201-129123) AND VALENTIN
LOGINOV <201-2854123, BOTH SUSPECT XGB. SOVS ASKED HIM FPÉPARE
TrAVEL INFO ON TRAINS AND SHIPS, BETUEEN MEXICO, NEW CRA IND
EUROPE, LOGINOV APPEARS FRIENDLY AND TOLD SUEJ NE MOPES THEY
-*LE-BE FRIENDS.:
& PASWING OFFICER TURNED SUBJECT OVER TO SIATION OFFICER TO WHOM
AUREED ACT -AS ACCESS AGENT LOGINOV
REQUEST HES REPROCESS
POA.
•SECRET
* REF., LAURICLE
CEN 5837-1 HMMW-12821 HMMW-12821 5372 65 PBSWING PAVEL YIASKOV YIASKOV 122123
VALENTIN LOGINOV 201-285412 KGB SOVS NEW YORK EURUPE LOGINOV
PRSWING LOGINOV HOS POA
ST
SERRET
501.885412
---
## Page 2
sa, es
DISPATCH
SECRET
AX
Celo S00
chief, HID
Chief of Station, Mextoo City
xx
REDWOOD
UndentIfied Visitor 20 the Sorter Embassy In Mexico Cisy.
193636 89144
Masola Fa ride-r
10+048I N933
LICALLA and LILYRIC reported an unidentified visitor.ro the Sovier Eabsssy
La Maxico City between 29 November and 3 Decenber 1965.
The visitor appears
to be a Sorter; horever, LIFIRE has not reported any inaccounted for soviet
to havo visited Mexico during this period, nor las the presence of a Sorter
visitor reported to the station by any other source. Is has not been seen
since 3 Decenber 1263.
?, According to LiCNad, the visitor was principally in contace with the
cook, Anatoliy Aleksawrovich ALRiN (201-223948),
miministrative
sour chey Arena trove: PARO (203-% 1365),
• Miril secretary
and Anoin
KGB officer Malfair Ivanorich SEAMVICH (201-343894), First Secretary and
kron AGb officer Aleksandr Vladimirovich MINDDU (201-202379). and Press
Arracia mid known AGb officer Maholmy Sergeyevich LEONA (201-1-32 139)
According to LILYRIC,
the visitor ias geen leaving the Saviet Enhassy
writh Mililn, and later with Third Secretary and suspect KOB osticer
Valentin Sergerevich LOCINOV (201-285412) on 30 Noventer 1905:
On 1 Decenber
he was seen lesving with MUNiN and his wife, Contarcial Conselor Georgly
Stepanovich VIS&0 (201-243603) and chauffeur Anatoliy Paylovich PRAlICULIN
(201-735052) In the car norally driven by
Pravda correspondent Vialimir
-Aga fonovich DOLOOV: (201=763035)5
- On 2 Docenber he was soon leaving with
KIN Sid his wife, zaKaY, visitor Ferdinand
Rove rovich CINTO mad
(continued)
Distribut ion:
•AID w/o/att
2 • File-
CDOSS PERSIACA TO
1094A-28001
CLASSE CATION
SECRET
Prey fled 50-8-10
3 January 1900
1501285412
201-4-04
---
## Page 3
• CONTINUATION OR
DISFATCH
SECRET
1N04-23201
Arrache and suspect kiB officer Visdisla SorgeYaNC DORMSKIN (201-744341)
On 3. Decenter la mas seen learing wich MAHN sil
do Abrached is a photographi of tha visitor taten by LiLYRIC.
in state veric portda for possible dentification
es the attached photograph could t
for/wllard C. OJiTIS
---
## Page 4
DiSPATCH
Chief of Ststion, Mexice Caty
CLASSMICA: ION
SIGNE I
PROCESSINR ACT:OR...
XXXXX 110 1902U8G FUED
CAIT QUALIFIS DISA
D4FO
Fries
Chief. SR via Chiefa hil
SUBJECT
REDWOOD
¿talentin Sergeyevich LOGINOY (201-295112)
ACTION REQUIRLO REFERINCES
REFERENCE: HiMW- 13985, 16 Septomber 1965
Fotwarded herewith is paragraph 9 (PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
AND PHOTOS) of summary traces in SPR format on Valentin
Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412) as promised to you in
the above reference.
BAG:
BRUCE H. GINTALAS
ATTACHMENT:
Paragraph 9 as stated above
TELETT
DISTRIBUTION:
Orig. & 2-Chief' of Station, Mexico City (W/att):
1c00)
CROSS REFERENCI
DISPATON STARDON AMD MUMBER
ENMN 14087
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
907-285412
CS. C32%
DATE
LANOv 1965
GROUP .1
28. October 1965
factuced Mam zing".
PAT PACE: L'S MOS FILE NUMBER
deciassificatias
201-285412
ON FICE
OFFICER
ORIGINATING
TYPIST
Exr.
ST./0/PA
vib
6213
COORDINATING
OFFICE STRUCK
DATE
OTICER'S MANE
SR/O/WH
25 Eeт65
1-RID (w/att)
I-SR/O/WH (wo/att)
RH/1 (wo/att)
RELEASING
DECER SS GRATURE
Pret Sosas
7/KI1/1
¡ DATE
143)
MICHATEU
+ce 53
---
## Page 5
1d-0000
SECRET
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION AND PHOTOS:
Do: Height: 68 tall.
Co
Biild:
strong build; ca. 185 Ibs. in Havane.
do Hairs, blond wavy hair.
8o Shape of Face: concave forehead.
1- 1:721
9:9 27
WTFE:
201-203412
RFF: 4:
SO1C107
PFT
-20553
S010107:
S010I0T
#:: 0) 660-14057
SECRET
547-255412
---
## Page 6
DISPATCH
SECRET
10
INTO
Chief, su Division
-- are, =.
XXX:
MATO AT IT
NO REATURE RICE Ra.
en?"
CAS SOLE INTONINa.
chies, sa Division
SUBMICT
chlof of Station, Mexico CAtY
REDCOAT/LCIMPROVE John: - a STRATOS
ACTION REQUIRLD FUURENCES
LICOZY/S reported that on 12 Octobor 196S Subject visited
his place
of business and said thit he had been referred to LICOZY/S
by the Soviot inbassy. llo said ho was intorested in a one-may tickot
the Soviet Union.
Subjock furnished the following information
tO LICOZY/S :
Ho was born on 19 August 1942 in Michigau..
He-is :
a student at U.C.h.A. and wante to visit the USSR as a tourist.
Subject held U. 5. passport number C 630391 1ssuod 29 August 1962.
His tourist card shoved that he enteroil Noxico
by bus at Sonoita,
Sonora on 9. Uctober 1965.
Subject pald for 15
days in the
Soviet Union but sald that he planned so stay longer.
Ho left Mexico via Air France flighe 703 on 16-Ocrober;
(confired by
flight manifosts).
His plans call for hin to depare
Paris for Moscos via Air Prance Flighe 724 on 17 Ocsober.
During a routine
visit to the Consular Section of the soviet
Embassy, Valontin S. LOGINOV thanked LiCOZY/S for
"taking care"
of subject but.
in the prosence of both PRIKHODO any Consular
officor Vladimir S. KORMUSHKIN, LOGINOV admonished: LIC02Y/5 {0r 09KI0g
for more biographic-data than he necded to fill our the necessary
LIC0ZY/5 dented that he had asked for more information than
(Subject apparontly reported kICOrY/S's
obtatuing the above biographic data for was debriefed by LOGINOy,
goeng unusual for in American student to travol fron the
U.S. to Moxico in order to travel to the Sovior Undon since ho le
mutomatically increasing. the cost of his travol by a considorable
Since Subject Crossed Into Mexico on 9 October,
veck before his departure for the USSR, it would appoar that ho
came to Mexico exclusivoly for this purpose.
the P. So a Chortle ling via Moxico was to conceal this trip froa
Killard C. CURTIS
Distribution!
CIBHAICH SYMODE, ANI NUMAGI
HAMLA • 27467
CLASSI
SECRET
CABE
20
OCTOBER 1905
+C585-51203201285412
FFN: P -2712
---
## Page 7
DISPATCH
QLASSITKATON
PROCESSING ACTION
SECRET
BARNED FOR IHOEXIS
XXX
NO IROCTING REQUIRED
Chief,: SR
ENFOR
Chief, hit
SUBJECT
Q RETHOOD - Valent in Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-265412)
oner or station, monto a e
ONLY QUALIFIED DISA
CAM NAGE INDEXINO
actoram
CTION REQUILD - REFEREN
LIPIRE reported the arrival on 10 October 1965, vía Sabena Might 555,
of Subject's wife, Aleksandra Dmitriyevna, ard his son Dnitriy. Travelling
on the same flight were Boris Aleksandrovich KAZANTSEV (201-028975) and nia
pad pi8387 27425
wife returning to Mexico from home cave:
i fian -
forMillard C. CURTIS
DISTRIBUTION:
2 a C/SR
-C/WH
CROSS REFERENCE TO
CS CORI
DISPATCH STRADIO AND MEMBER
HMMA 27420
CLASTREICATION
SECRET
201-2854112
DATE
14 October 1965
HQSIAISLADER
201-285412
---
## Page 8
14-00000
DISPATCH
GAIJARAIIN
SECRET
Chief of station, Muxico ClEy
EAVO
MAN: SO STAR
NO INCE EIDERIO
CHET QUANTID E151
CAT NONE ISOCKING
Chief, Se via Chiof, Mi
REDADOD
(Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201 283412)
ACTIOP RIQUARTO RUFUREHOLS
REFERENCE: - MAXI 4363, 7 August 1969
1. Forwarded herowlth are sumiary traces in SPR format on
Valentin Sorgeyevich LOcINoV, reflocting a digest of avallable
Information In Headquartors £1los.
2, Paragraph 8 of the above atcachuent (PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
AND PHOTOS) will be forvarded to you ae a lator date under soparate
dispatch as soon as the photos hnve buen procossed here at lleadyuarters.
3o" Forwarded under separate cover, la Paragraph 21 (IDENTITIES).
BRUCE H. GINTALAS
ATTACHHENTS:
Bo.
Summary traceo in
SPR format (h/w)
Paragraph 21 (IDENTITIES) (u/s/c)
DISTRIBUTION!
Origo & 2-Chief of Station, Mexico City (watt A, H/w; Watt 8, u/s/C)
201-285912
CROSS REFERENCE TO
DISPATCH STABOL AND NUMBER
HMM 13935
CLASSIFIC.
GROW 1
domegrarin: ana
declasalticaller
SECRET
DIATE
23SEP 1905
16 September 1965
HOS FILE MUMBER
201 285412
Of FIE
ORIGIATING
160931
SR/O/PA
vjb
COORDINATING
Fat?
OFFERS NAME
1- RDEW/ALt A & B
1- SR/OCKH (wats A & B)
1- WHEE
SR/O/WH
WI/1
20 Setos
4/31
77
Rilessins
+01-19448
68 ad / 1
6213
'??!
---
## Page 9
14-00000
ATTACHNENT EZE TO
# 13985
SECRET
SUNMARY TRACES IN SPR FORMAT
PREPARFD BY.
DATE
201 NUMBER
A NUMBER
BRUCE M. CINTARAS •
8 September 1965
201 285412
18721
1.
NAME:
Valentin Sergeyevsch LOGINOV
- 20
DPOB:
23 December 1927, Moscow
3O CITIZENSHIP AND PASSPORT DAA:
a. USSR citizen.
bo Passport D016993, Issuud 24 August 1960.
c. Passport D010264, Issued 1965
6.
CURRENT POSITION:
Third Secretary, Soviet Embassy, Mexico City.
7.
RELATIVES:
Spouse:
do Children:
Aleksandra Dmitriyevna, born 20 August 1928, Moscow..
Worked in the Consular Offico in Havana. Speaks
poor Spanish.
Son - Dmitrty Valentinovich, born 1959.,
Daughter - Irina Valentinovna, born ca. 1952.
LANGUAGES:
Subject speaks fluent Spanish with a slight accent.
..,. Subject spoke some Engitsh while he, was in Havana.'
RIS INPUT NO. I
THOA $9
207-285412
*
read the st in the
---
## Page 10
SBCRET
11. CURRICULUM VITAE:
A February 1960 Diplomatic List from Argentina lists Subject as
a new Soviet Military Attache due to arrive in Buenos Alres in the near.
future. There is no. indication that Subject ever filled that post.
From September 1960 to September 1963, Subject and family vere
In Havana where subject served as
an Attache at the Soviet Embassy.
December 1961, he accompanted the Soviet DYNAMO soccer team on a Latin
American tour as their escort and Interpreter.
Subject arrived in Mexico City on 3 August 1965 to roplace knowm
KCB officer Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO (201 305870), as. a Third
Secretary®
12. INTELLIGENCE AFFILIATION:
subject is listed as probable RIS, probably KGB.on the basis of
his activitiés while statiored in Havana and by virtue of his replacing
& known KGB officer in Mexico City.
Per HArMA 28310, 3m0166 Sulyset
13 g
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITY:
While subject accompanted the DYNAMo soccer team through La Pas
1n December 1961, he became acquainted with KISHIN-1 (Identity i), a
KUBÄRK Bolivian security service penetration and later'a low level
Bolivian university-cell CP penetration. It is not recorded upon whose
Initiative the contacte were made. However, by KISHIN-l's admission
he had several informal and friendly reetings with Subject during which
Subject encouraged KISHIN-I to accept a Cuban student grant. Infact he
specifically expressed an
eagemess to be of any assistance in helping
KISHIN-1 to get to. Cuba. KISHIN-l never went to Cuba, although he did
SEC
RET
---
## Page 11
1d-0000
SECRET
13a (CONTINUED)
correspond with Subject on the mattar un at least one occasion. KISHIN-I
was terminated
as an agènt In July 1969 for security reasons and because
It was belleved that
he was a fabricature: No further dèvelopments in
-his associatiön with Subject were noted.
On the same trip through Latin Anurica in December 1961, Subject
was observed to have In his possussion some $2,000 in' United States
currency. Aftor sending the soccer tram back to Moscow from Quito,
*Subject continued alone through Panama Cily, where he was
seen in contact
with a Mexican eltizen with whom he flow on to Mexico City. In Mexico
City Subject reported to known KGB officer Aleksey Ivanovich CARMASHOV
(201 227418) at the Soviet Embassy. Frouà sensitive source it was.;
Learned that CARMASHOV lad been linstructed to look into the mattor of
Subject's four-day délay in returning to lavana from Quito and that
Subject's superlors in Havana wore concarned.
It is not known what
relationship, 1l any, these circunstoneci have to each other.
„In Havana carly in 1963, Subjeck bufriended and apparently attempted
to cultivate VASLOUCHs 1, 2, and 3:(Iduntitles 2, 3, and 4). The.
association was discoüraged by KUBARK because VASIOUCH-I and 2 were
performing important functions in connuction with Cuban FI actlvities and
contact with a possible RIS officer was not thought destreable.
In September 1962 at the Invitation of Senhor Vazco Leltao de CUNHA,
Brazilian Ambassador to Cuba and newly appointed Ambassador to the Soviet
Union, VASLOUCH- 3 traveled
to Moscow and accepted a clerical position
at the Brazilian Embassy where she remainc
for approximately two years.
year later, in September 1963, Subject returned
PCS to Moscow.
Between
December 1963 and February 1964, Subject made three attempts to see
VASLOUCH-3. According to VASLOUCH-3, che contacts were by telephone only
SECRET
---
## Page 12
ECRET
130 (CONTINUED)
and she did not meet with Subject personally while in Moscow.
15.
CONTACTS:
KISHIN- 1.
In December 1961 in La Paz, Bolivia, Subject was in contact with
See paragraph 13 above and Identities.
Subject was in contact in Panama City and on a flight from Panama
City to Mexico City in December 1961 with Edmindo Fausto ZORRILLA
Martinez, a Mexican citizen who had been traveling around Latin America.
The nature-of this contact has not-been determined,
Subject befriended and apparently attempted to develop in Havana
VASLOUCHS 1, '2, and 3 See paragraph 13 above and Identities:
20.
TRACES FOR LIAISON:
See first page following.
21. IDENTITIES:
See second page following.
E
C
E T
---
## Page 13
SECRET
Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV
- DPOB: - 23 December 1927, Moscow:
PASSPORTS: D016993, issued 24 August 1960
DOlO 264, issued 1965
POSITION: Third Secretary, Soviet Embassy, Mexico CIty.
WIFE:
Aleksandra Dimitrlyevna, born 20 August 1928, Moscow., Worked
1n. the Consular Office of the Soviet Embassy In Havana.
Speaks poor spanish.
SON:
initrly Valentinovich, born 1959:
DAUGHTER:
Irina Valentinovna, born' ca. 1952...
LANCUAGES:
Subject speaks, fluent Spanish and poor English.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
He t's 6' tall, wetghs 185' lbs., has a
strong
build, blond wavy hatr, and-a concave forehead.
TRAVEL: In 1960 Subject was designated to the Soviet Embassy in
Argentina as a Military Attache, however, there is no.
record that Subject ever filled that post.
From September 1960 to September 1963, Subject and fámily
were in Havana where Subject, served as an Attache at the
Soviet Embassy. In December 1961, he accompanied the
Soviet
DYNAMO Soccer tean on a latin American tour as
their escort and interpreter.
ECRET
10+4446 113-66i74
P time n
reat trin
---
## Page 14
14-00000
I pain 35 578749627
Misuach caritars
1ta f
CADES SEPALATE CONCI
ATTAC NOMI B TO
HMM
-3955
SECREI
_IDENTITIES"
IDENTITY ONE
IDENTIFY TWO
IDENTITY THREE
IDENTITY FOUR
DELGADILLO Menacho, Adalid, formerly a Captain on
the Bolivian Police Force.
KUBARK agent from 1960
to 1963.
MATIAINEN, Laure Olavs, Honorary Finnish Counsel
In Havana and KUBNEY contact since 1962.
MATINAINEN, Estrella, wife of IDENTITY TWO.
MATIKAINEN, Annels, daughter of IDENTITIES TWO
and
THREE.
SECR
ET
sen no tamiere ge 13-0
the sand
Jean as are on to said strengte the de not
we she carbon read
---
## Page 15
DISPATCH
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
TO
Ch 1c&, SR Division
INTO,
FROM
Chief, WH Division
Chief of Station, Mexico CLy i
_SUBJECT
6. REDWOOD - Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412)
ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES
REFERENCE: MEXI 4363, "6 August 1965
XXXX
PROCESSIND ACTION
MARTEN TOO LUCEYING
NO INDEXINO ARQUIREO
ONLY QUALIFIED DESK
CAN JUDGE INDEMINO
MICROFILM -
Subject's arrival in Mexico was reported in Reference. Attached are
coples of subject's passport, obtained througti kITEMPO, no. D-010264, Issued
24 June 1965 in. Moscow and valla for flve years.
i A me too
for
Willard C. CURTIS
Attachment:
Copies
of Passport"
Digtribution:
2 - CSR, w/att., as stated, H/W*
1. - CWH, w/o att.
.
GROUP 1
Eacteded fears auere
dera rica, int
CROSS REFERENCE TO
CS COPY
DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER
HMMA -- 26881
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
201-285412
DATE
12 AUGUST 1965
NOS FILE NUMDER
201-285412
FEN °
P-11712
---
## Page 16
UNION
DES FEN BIOL'ES
SNICTIO. ES SOCINUSTES
PISSEPORT
DIPLEMITIQUE
*COiO] COGETCKHX
СОЦИА МАСТИЧЕСКИХ
•РЕСПУБЛИК
Д Кº 010284
+eraps Decorteran Cecr
---
## Page 17
Entaltro Serrâtairo de 1°
II:0. H9/ 000
3.2.304
кань syaa*
---
## Page 18
PERA MATINZCRA
đel
---
## Page 19
14-00000
CAST 005854121
CLASSIFIED NESSAGE
FIRE 40..
244 SECRET
CEBPROr. O'sIG
SON/UNIT
NOTIFIED
Mexico Cirt
SR-8
GRID COPR
COP 16S
30
ADVANCE COP
Dieuro Driero Devio
REPRODUCTION-PROMIBITED
SECRETS OICCIEZ
" DIR CITE MEXI 4363
REDWOOD
1. LIFIRE REPORIS ARRIVAL 3 AUG VIA SABENA FLIGHT 555 OF
VALENTIN LOGINOV, AGE 38 PPT D-P1P264, NEW THIRD SECRETARY
SOVIET EMB MEXICO.
2: PRESUMABLY IDEN VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH LOGINOV
281-285412. REQUEST SUMMARY TRACES.
-3. BELIEVED REPLACING NECHIPORENKO: 221-3058.70•
SECRET
CEN: 4563 3 AUG VIA SABENA 555 VALENTIN LOGINOV 38. PPT
DE 10264 IMI D-BIEZSA SOVIET EMB MEXICO IDEN VALENTIN
SEPGEYEVICH LOGINOV 201-285412 NECHIPORENKO 2e1-385878
BT
SECRET
AN L EF
ABSTRACI
5267071571
•Ihoak
• 7 AuG 55 BI 2756 1
201-285-7124
7A4665
201-285412
siderik.
---
## Page 20
1d-0d0d
10
FROM " DIRECTOR
MESSACE FORE
A SEER BE
& MIRCH 2065 SiTINGSHINO 25-6-33
INFO: JARAVE
7116.5
MOSE dE 10ND 56705/00 10120 GUISE
WAVE
CITE DIA
TYPIC VASLOUCH
REF.
TEN 1701 (1Y 30193)
95920
1.
SUBJ REF (IDEN A) IS VASLOUCH 3, DAUGURER V-I (IDE-I) AND
V-2, (YDEN C). V-1 AND V-2 CURRENTLY RESIDE PBRUSES AND LIVE BEEN
HQS REPORTING ASSETS SINCE FEB 63.
2:: V-2 WORKED APPROX I2 YEARS BRAZILIAN EMBASSY PERLIES.
WAS
QUITE CLOSE TO ALSUPER AND FAMILY WEN HE HAD EID THERE AND TOURED
FUSTEAL WITH HIM FOR NOITH NY LOGINOC
V-3: CLOSE FRIEND ALSUPER DAUGHTER.
EARLY 63 LOCAL SOY XGE TIPE WILO HAD PREVIOUS JUSTNESS CONTACTS
WITH Y-2 MADE SOCIAL CONTACT WITH V-1 AND Y-2 IN RELATIVELI CLUSSY
EFFORT DEVELOP THEM. V-1 AND Y-2 WERE INSTRUCTED BY VOS TO NOID
FURTHER CONTACT: XGB OFFICER RETURNED PCS MOSCOW LATE AUG 63. BETWEEN
DEC 63 AND FEB 64 HE MADE THREE MILD ATTEMPTS CONTACI V3 IN MOSCON:
EFFORT CONTICT VASLOUCIES APPARENTLY- DROPPED WITH NO FURTiER
- DEVELOPMENT. HQS HAS NO ADDITIONAL INTO TO COSFIRM OR DISPELL.
ALSURAIS SUSPICIONS V-3 SOVIET PENETRATION.
4. V-3 HAS BEEN SOLENHAT NORRY TO PAHENTS AND IQS THADUGHOUT®
OUR ASSOCIATION. PARENTS DESIRE SEE VIJ LOÇATED SAFELY SOME WESTERN
CITY WITH GOOD JOB AND SECURE INCONE MATCHES HQS WISH ELIXINATE HER
0+*164a
SECRET
PRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THEISSUING DIRCH IS PROMELEO
5013285812
---
## Page 21
MESSAGE FORM
SECRET
ROUTYS
EXT
DATE.
TO
TRQM DIRECTÖR
CONT
I INDEE
O. NO INDEX
P-FEE IN CS FILE NO.
PAGE THO
TO
INFO
an of
AS SOURCE CONCERN HER: PARENTS.
86720
REQUEST STA TAKE NO ACTION THIS MATTER AT THIS TIME.
HQS
CONCERN PRIMARILY THAT WORRY ABOUT V-3 NOT BE ALLORED JEOPARDIZE
FUNCTIQNING V-1 AND Y-2• V-3 MAY EVEN AGREE: SQNE FUTURE DATE ACT AS
SW LINK BETWEEN V-I AND HQS IF SUCH CHANNEL EVER NEEDED.
END Or MESSAGE
Attrie
DESSOND FITZGERALD
C/#H
C/VA/C/FI
C/WH/C/HO Walter Cind (an drast)
WH/5
→(by phonas
SR/CI/KOB
DCHD/C
SINALAATIAL SILLIN
OFFICIA
SAC RET
RIPRODUCTION SY OTHER THAN THEISULE OPISS iS FICTIONIO.
+90,600
• Pay die
---
## Page 22
LAti
DATE.
1O'.
PROM
r48.
Кр1в.
MESSAGE FORM 21
mI7C/YI/10
O O0
BECRET
6172
Di NO DOD
29 MARCH 1965 23 IRI IN CS TR NO 2'8-6-33
INTO:
JAWAVE
27383
ROUTING
DIRECTOR
29 MissiS.
2241₴1
To ,
CITI DE;
96921
TYPIC: VASLOUCH
REE DIR
96120
-Time rai
END OF MESSAGE
C/wh/C/FI
•C/WH/C/HO Walter
C101
dra8t) 8f
DESHOND FITZGERALI
/WHA
_(b$ phone) 15.
JOHN I
BR/CI/KGB
nas and or phoney
DOWHDA
1508-29
9B CR SIL
ALPRODUCTION DY OTHEA THAN THE QUING ONICT TE FROHINITIO
HART
Coop rio
---
## Page 23
ACTION
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE,
POTAL.. COPIES
SECRET
PERSON/UNIT NOTICES.
9:53 AN '65
WH-8
AQVANCE COPY
UN 1P,
Dissoro
MR BLE, DDP WH C-8. Co, CF/OP5, F5, SR-7
Reserve lay noto
E Ta
DIR INFO WAVE CITE.
7701
2 6 Aes 65
11170 25 JUNE 1053 MOUT SENT NAVED
ON 23 MARCH NERGEDES MAGALHAES LINTO, PERSONAL
SECRETARY ALSUPER 2, INTRODUCED MILKES TO ANNELL MATIKAINEN,
WHO VISITING RIO FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH. MATIKAINEN
SAID ALTHOUGH HER FÚTURE PLANS INDEFINITE, SHF HAD NO INTENTION
RETURNING PSRUMEN, WHERE HER PARENTS ASSIGNED. SATO SHE MIGHT
ACCEPT EMPLOYMENT IN NEW YORK. CITY OR WOULD RETURN TO EUROPE.
HOWEVER, LIRIO IS ATTEMPTING TO INTEREST MATIRAINEN IN REMAIN-
ING RIO AND ASKED MILKES IF MATIKATEN DID STAY, COULD ME-DIREC
HER TO SOME AMERICAN COMPANY OR U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCE FOR
MENT.
EMPLOVESH MYLKES LEFT MATTER ÖPEN SAYING HE WOULD HAVE CO
HAVE MORE INFO ON MATIKAINEN'S QUALIFICATiONS:
.20
ONLY INFO
SE MATIKALNEN CONTAINED
iN REF
SUPPLIED BY ALSURAH, WHO NOW. ON TWO YEAR LEAVE FROM
HIS SERVICE AND ONLY IN
ON INFREQUENT. VISITS, WILL ATTEMFI
TO ELICIT MORE DETAILS FROM ALSURAN AT FIRST OPFORTUNITY..
3.
APPRECIATE HQS FORWARDING ANY ADDITIONAL INFO ON
MATIKAINEN WHICH WOULD TEND TO CONFIRM AL SURANS DOUBIS ABOUT
CREDIT
lunches with Matikain.
201 sortable
001-285412
307
KA Int
35p-?°
NAR 1b6:
initiated
---
## Page 24
1d-0d0d
IN 3.01.93/82.
SECRET
HEN AS NOTED REF.
A..
INFO WAVE, ALSURAH REPORTED IN REF HE SUSPECTEU
MATIKAINEN AS BEING SOVIET PENETRATION HIS EMBASSY IN MOSCOW.
SHE WAS CURIOUS BEYOND NORMAL HOUNDS AND WANTED TO SEC. EVERY-
THING. SHE WAS SUSPECTED OF HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH ONE OF THE
BRAZILIAN OFFICIALS IN MOSCOW WHO HAD RAISED HER EMBASSY
PAY TÓ SIDO DOLLARS A MONTH. SHE HAD PREVIOUSLY SERVED
WITH AL SUPER-I IN PBRUMEN
SECRET
CFN.
SECRET
Hi 22
---
## Page 25
CL 4SSIFIED MESSAGE
SECRET
20160
ROUTING
TD-
DrACUTOR
FROM MINE
ACTIOH:.
Las S
INFO::
CL.
C/22, Mr /207 61/02, 1/02,
Ar/NE,
V'F
TOC'S
SECRE
1720921
INTEL
• SUPDATA:
AMIAUP-5 FROM ANUNIDENTIFIED INFORMANT.
PARA. 2:
AMTAUP-5: RID:
NO. INDEX: FILED 17/241827
REPORT CLASS SECRET CONTROLLED DISSEM
COUNTRY: CUBA/USSR
$U30 :.
PASSPORT ACTIVITY AT THE SOVICT EMBASSY-IN HABANA
TA. CONTINUED ARSENCE FRON-CUBA-OF SOVIET VICE CONSUL
LOGUINOY
COi: CD DECEMOSP. 1963
PARA: UNITED STATES, MIAMI (LA JANUARY 1964)
I COMMENT:
NO. DISSEMINATION OF THE ATTÄCHED
TD FORTION OF THIS CIPLE HAS BEÉN.
MADE OUTSIDE TH: AG:"CY PENDING
RELEASE BY THE ACTION UNIT-
(HolD for fimna.)-
IN 08925
RELEASING INO:
CATE DISTRIBUTED:
BASED ON.
TOCS
PRECEDENCE
ROUTIVE
PRIORITY
LIAISON: 501-585-4102
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
Copy No.
---
## Page 26
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE
SECRET
ROUTING
ACTION
INFO
• PAGE 2:
- IN 88925
UFG-14505
AND HAS REPORTED MILITARY INFORMATION WHICH, FOR THE MOST PART,
HAS BEEN ACQUIRED BY PERSONAL OBSERVATION.
THE INFORMATION IN
PARA, ! WAS OBTAINED FROM AN UNIDENTIFIED INFORMANT AND THAT IN
PARA: 2 FROM PERSONAL OBSERVATION.
IT COMMENT:
TDCS
PRECEDENCE
ROUTINE
PRIORITY
RELEASING IMO:
DATE DISTRIBUTED:
BASED ON:
LIAISON:
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
Copy No.
---
## Page 27
SECRET
LANIRAL INTILLICUNCI AGENCY
Inteligence infornation Cable
COUNTRY
DATE OF
TOCS
JUAFC!
PRADEA:
DATE ACQ.
SOURCE
ANJ
APPRAISAd
Id. 268925
MENT ASSAN ANT.
_* III. ON ZEIDEGEMBER 1963, THERE WAS A LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE
• AT THE SOVIET CONSULATE AND EMBASSY IN THE VEDADO SECTION OF THE:
CITY OF HABANA WHO WERE APPARENTLY MAKING PREPARATIONS FOR DEPARTING
FROM CUBA.
SOME OF THESE INDIVIDUALS PRESENTED. A BOOK WITH A RED
COVER BEARING THE CYRILLIC LETTERS "CCCP RPT CCCP" IN GOLD AND
RECEIVED A FORM TO FILL OUT AND RETURN. OTHERS RECEIVED A WHITE CARD
WITH A PHOTOGRAPH. ONE SOVIET ASKED FOR Á POSTPONEMENT OF HIS
TRIP, SAYING THAT HE WAS MARRIÇO TO A CUBAN GIRL WHO WOULD NOT BE
ABLE TO STAND THE COLD.
A HIGH DIPLOMAT, WHO WORE GLASSES AND WHO
WAS ABOUT 6$ YEARS OLD, ANGRILY EXPRESSED HIMSELF TO THE CUBANS IN
SECRET
STASE/ONE DIA RENTASI MAVY ANA IS SECORA NSA NIC AID USA OCS ONE OCA OIR 0O
---
## Page 28
CLASSIFICATION: DISSEMINATION CONTROLS
SECRET
• (Wh* y5hot 28)
TOCS
IN
00925
PAGE 2
SPANISH.
COMMETA NEITHER LOCATION NOR CIRCUMSTANCES
RELATIVE TO THIS EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE HIGH DIPLOMAT AND THE CUBANS
WERE REPORTED:)
2.. • AS OF: 28 DECEMBER, SOVIET VICE CONSUL VALENTIN S.
LOGUINOV HAD NOT RETURNED TO CUBA FROM THE SOVIET UNIQN:
DISSEM: STATE (MIAMI).
END OF MESSAGE
CLASSIFICATION - DISSEMINATION CONTROLS
SECRET
ross 2096
APO. 6-03
-1. (15-30-46-47)
CO....NUATON OF TOCS INFORMATION REPCR...
114771
---
## Page 29
CONTINUATION OF
DISPATCH
SECRET
ARMIA • 28501
Embassy offices.
älCALLA thinks that Sunjoct left the Labnssy at
1115:
having put is luggage
the oor with license elates l9-JA.
(Tials
is the car
Tegularly driven by LOCGINOV.)
A LIbALLA pilOtO
graph of subject is forwarded as Attachment B (leadquarters only).
*.
FOM LIESVOY it appears that LOGINOV was principally
rosponsible for subjoct's travel arrangerents.
•LOGINOV.
probably
met subject at the airport.
since kIMllLU roported that LOGINOV
left tic soviet kbassy in
10-DA at 0535 and
returned at 0058 on
20 March 1960,
apparently having dropped subject off at the liotel
Aglies.
subject's wife was not reported to have visited the Libassy.
The station had not volieved that subject would be ablo
to take the 21 march flight to lavana,
there had been no
Vladislav Sergeyevich: AORMUSHNIN (201-744341) had visitod the Cuban.
Embassy in person on lộ March 1900,
at which time he probably
arranpod for Subject's visa.
for
Villard C. CURTIS
=÷÷÷
r0" 530
UST DORISETON
DASSSAATAT
SECRET
---
## Page 30
DISPATCH
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
PROCISSINO ACTION
XXX
MARNTO FOR IS
Chief, SR Division
1NP0
ORLY QUALIFILD DESE
CAN NOGE INOCUME
- Chiefe bit Division
chicker station, Mexico Girill
microrna
SUBJECT
REDKOOD/LCIMPROVE - Valentin Sericyovich LOGINOV (201-285+12)
ACTION REQUIRED - RETURUNCOI
Subject has been identified as a lok officer based on
following incidents.
on 12 February 1966 Moksandy Vladimirörich PRURHODO / P
igh case officer, during a mecting with LIcozY-s,
todd- 202328-s kha cis would crine subject to their next mecting and
that Subject would be LICOZY-S's new case officer.
During Januar!
1960 Cristobal
la ToRREs Ponce,, shauffeur.
employed by the
in Mexico City,
to the Soviet Embassy in
regard to a Soviet visa for one of
American Imbassy officials.
spoke with subject, who, after
asking whether ir would get TORRES-in
trouble if he went to
ended up by
TORRES to dinner on
24 January
TORRES did not meet Subject. that
and on 8 February 1966
Subject called TORRES at thé American
Embassy to ask why, he had not
TORRES replied that he had
lad to nork.
Subject asked
whether TORRES had located a person lio could teach him English:
TORRES replied that one person whom he had asked had not been
interested, and Subject asked him to cop. Looking
Subject again called TORRES ön 9 February 1900,
but TORRES was out.
is noted that Subjcet's calls to TORRES have not appeared on
LIENVOY and were therefore presumably made from a pay station.)
for
Killard C. CURTIS
Dispribution:
CSR
CHH
continuin
CRONICALS
CROSS REFERENCE TO
GS COPY
DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER
INMA - 28390
CIASSIFICATION
SECRET
DATE
3 MARCI: 1966
HOS FHE NUMBER
201-285412
---
## Page 31
0... 03 nec. 5
$3015
i E, Espera cente
je'
SECRET SOLONE CHIS CHICO CHEY 1191
31050707
3.3
:7532
10: CEO LIENSOY MO 1US SOULET FRESH TORCH AND URA DEFICER NIMOLAY
CONFERDICE. VICE CONCH MENTIE SERCSVEVICH DELION ALSO DELD ETerEY-S
0: P4 THE THAT- LEONOVAD TO EE IN 10S000 C1: 1111.
SHEFTO TELES
EVERAL CIPLINGS TO GET REGULATION FOR LEGACY TO NO DELT LES LEAVING
co
590A LIFEAT AND LICIUOY IT APPEARE THAT CONCUCAS PREDATING TO TE
0.12.
'LEAVE SODE POS. HE SOU LEAPIUS MITHOUT FAMILY APPAPENTUYLOS
s74s
3G73E
' 3.
DORS NEADGUAPTERO LIVE ELY INCICATIONS OR THAT. CONFERENCE LECYOU
YA! FEATHESSING?
HOEUCE LIEGLE SEPORTET BE MUNE THET GRONOR MES TOLE ME" SHAT
HE GRAVLIS 2 JULY AND HOLD GLY STAY 2?.3AYS MBO 3AIO 115 4553 50.516K
TUST SHE COULD MOT ACCOMFANY KIMO BEPORTING LIPEE M-REGIOU TELATIONSHIP
EX PO CH.
S
BT.
T
---
## Page 32
CLASBITY TO FILE NO.
X-AIT TO PILE
CLaUSIFIED MESSAGE
SECRET
ASON/UNIT. ROTIFTEO
OTAL COPIT
REFRODUCTION-PROMIBITED
ACTION
ADVANCE COPY
UNIT
TAFO
WA 8.
• (A RIO COPY
O 000e0.
mE, ue 5B8 cifees. c/icz, FoliNTE
SECRET 2919452 CITE MEXICO CITY 8081
INFO DIRECIOR
REDCOAT LCIMPROVE
REF DIRECIOR 23740K
PLS INCLUDE LIAISON TRACES.
SECRET
Scutadi
29 Jr 66 I 66625
#REQUESTEA. TANCES ON
NICCLAS, JUHN GOSTAGEN.
BT
NNNN:
fogens.
501-285-412
---
## Page 33
B#16:
3654
GATE: 2S JULY 1956
Dissin are ran
= €.
D INDEN
O NO INDEE
O FILE IN'CS FILE NO.
PEOis: DIRECTOR
• WHS ORIO COPY
МУ. БАЛЕ ГОНИ
ДДІEВ:
à.
SECRET
1047190
5
6
I:
RR
-19501 VA:
20 20. 51°Z. CITE DIRECTOR
TO.
23746-
INFO MEXICO CITY.
RSDCOAT LCIMPROVE
MEXICO CITY 8020 (IN 62261) * NOT SENT
REQUEST STATION TRACES FOR MEXICO CITY ON:
•A. NICOLAS: JUAN BOSTROEN, BORN 1915 IN ST. PETERUBURG, RUSSIA,
NOW VENEZUELAN CITIZEN. EMPLOYED AS "DIRECTOR OF PROJECT BY
STEPHENS- ADAMSON DE MEXICO, FORMERLY SERVED IN U.S. NAVY.
B. VALENTINA GRUSDOW DE BOSTROEN, PORN BRESLAU, GERMANY, 42
YEARS OLD, WENT TO USSR WHEN SMALL CHILD, WAS IN STALINGRAD IN
1942, WENT TO VENEZUELA POST WWIS NOW VENEZUELAN CITIZEN.
BOTH BOSTROEN'S NOW LIVE CALLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSON 419, MEXICO
CITY.
FYI
EXICAN OFFICIAL ADVISED STATION THAT
VALENTIN S. LOGINOY, KNOWN KGB STAFF OFFICER MEXICO CiTY, APpARENTLY
DEVELOPING POLICEMAN WHOM HE ASKED TO PROVIDE BOSTROEN HOME ADDRESS,
HONS TELEPHONE AND PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT.
•CONTINUED:
HELEASINE BEFICER
COORDIMATING OFFICENS
SECRET
REPRODUCTION DY OTHER THAN THO ISSUING OFPICE IS PRONIBITED.
006-0.85412
AUTHENICATIN!
logins.
---
## Page 34
ORI*
DATE:
DISSEN SY
O A MOCI
O FILE INCISILENA.
NFISAGE FORM
TITAS CODIES:
SECAST
PAGE 8
OUTING
1'8
MOM. DIRECTOR
•O RiD COPY
• 14P08 M:
SECRET
-1
CITE DIREGTOR 23746
3.
REL NEXICO CITY:
TRACES DESIRED.
NO TRACES FOS.
NOTIFY
IF LIAISON
END OF MESSAGE
WH Comment:
*Reported LOGINOV recruitment pitch to unnamed LITEMPQ8
policeman to report on Nicolas Juan and Valentina.
Grusdow
de Bostroen. Requested additional data these:
individuals to assist in providing LIRAN Into fOr: PNG
Of. LOGINOY:
WH/3VL
"SB/O/WH/I
SB/CI/K/
(in draft)
7 (in draft)
(in draft).
William
Xias
Broe
DELLASTE OFFICIA
COORDIMATINE OFFICERS
SECRET
REPROSUCTION SY OTHER THAN THE ISSUMG OFP.CE IS PROMIBITED.
AUTHENTICATIN®
dEFICER
---
## Page 35
DISPATCH
SECRET
Chief, Wl Division
XXX
PROCESSING ACTION
MARRED POR INDEN INS
DO MOLTINO REQUIRED
ORLE QUALIFIO DESE
CAR MOGE: INDURG
Chief, SB Divleton
Chief of Station, Mexico City
SUBACT.
L REDCOAT/LCIMPROVE - Iriformation on Local Sovlets passed to LIRAMA
ACTION REQUIRLD • NEERENCES
REFERENCE: MEXICO CITY - 8020
1. Transmitted herewith are a llst of Sovlet Intelligence
personnel assigned to Mexico and a note on Valentin Sergeyevich
LOGINOV (201-285412) which were given by Chief of Station on
22 July to LIENVOY-2 for passage to LITEMPO-8 and LIRAMA.
The circumstances were explained in Reference.:
?. Please note that the following items in the LOGINOV note
are fictions of the Station
a. that LOGINOV jolned the KGB In 1955.
b. that he attended the KGB school (rom 1955 to 1957:
C. that he was an officer in KGB Headquarters from
1957 to August 1960
d. that the money found in his sultcase. in Paname in
December 1961 was for Latin American Communist
Parties (lt probably was):
c. that we have known LOGINOV as a KGR officer
sirice 1958
for/willard C. CURTiS
Attachment:
List of Soviet intelligence personnel
and note on LOGINOV
•Distribution:
2 - CWH, w/att. (1 copy); H/W
1 - CSB, w/att (1 copy), H/W
INTT
STIOSS REFERENCE TO
iS COPY
OISPATCH STRESOL AND MUMMACR
HMMA - 29626
GROL 1
sciates
iror solomatic
7:01-2:35417
DATE
27 JULY 1966
HOS FILE NUMBER
201-285412
---
## Page 36
SECRET
Valcatin Sergeyorich LCOLNOV
DC3: 23. Docoolbc 1927:
Position: Tatro Secretary la sho Consular Section Of tic
Sovic: Embassy, Mcxico D. F.
Residence: Tenselo Esteva 15-1, Colonia Facubaja:
Automobile: 1965 Clievrole Impal, license 19 DJ.
Languages: Fluent Spantsa, falt Erglish
Carcor:
1955: Joked the KOB
1955-57 Attendad tao KGS tratning ecicol
1957:- Augue: 1959: Oficer in KGO Ficudguariers, Moscow
Son: 1963-Sopt 1953: Attache In Huvara, Cuba
Decomics 1951: Travelled to Fanatha and Ecuador wich a
Sorlos soccer toam. On this trip he curried
& large sum ci money lot the Communist Patiles
ci Punania, and Equador.
17 May 1062: Tratoied Mexico on route to the USSK for leave.
9 Soptember 1963: Licit Cuba to rctuza to tice USSR
Sebterabar 1963:- July 1955: Officer 1a KCB Readquarters, Moscow.
3 August 1955: Arrived Mcnico
In Mexico LCGINOV replaced OlEg M. NECHPORENKO, anoter
KES citicer cud tobk ovcr all of NECHONEND's tolligence agents
and dacles. in January 1956 he attempied to cultivate and recruit
a chauticur ce the American Embassy la Minico. LOONOV Is an
unusually scrive and capable intelligence catcer.
Since ho has almost
ns crort duties ho ls able to spond about 9511
; or his time on intelligence
acelvity, We have known that bels a io3 culcer since 1953. His
Immediate KGb chict in Merico is Rival A. YATSKOV.
is corr
Tn1y874676
781-285418
---
## Page 37
SECAZi
Soviet Incolligcace. Ofileers Stailonod Li Mcsico
1. KGB (Commlisco fo= State Sucurley)
Chieti Sergcy S. KONSTANTLOY
Deputy Chlei, Alckoonar V. PRIKRODRO
OFFICERS:
Yergenly I. BEDRIN
Ivan A. BEKETCV.
Alcksande M. BROVKIN
VladImIr A. DOLGOV
Yevgeniy N. CORLITSYN:
Corto A. KAZANTSLY
Vladislavis. KORA USAKIN
Valcatin I. CuCiteROV
Svycteslav F. KUZNETSOV
Nikolay S. LEO:OV
Valcuti S. LCOn OV
Vestity S. MESOSINKOV
Lconid V. NutkO30V
Aleksandr 4. NKIFIN
Viadalr N. RADVANSKTY:
Vladimir i, SEPAKEVICH
Ccorgly S. VISKO
Pavel A. YATSKOV
Yurly ZHURIN
Corto S. ZOONIN
2. GRU (Militasy Istciligcico)
Cilof Vladimir N. SOKOLOV
Doputy Cilel: Gorgly A. SECHUCHIN
OFFICERS:
Alessandr M. DENISOV.
PetT F. CORELOV
VladImir P. COROLETS
•Yuriy.N..
ISAYEV
Anatoliy V. KARABACH
VIKtOr L. KHUKHOREV
Yurly A. MITROFOLSKIY
Valerly:V. SOKOLLY
Rusion A. TUCANN
8..
Kenstartin F. VORONKOV.
Ivan: V. YELFIMOV
---
## Page 38
SECRET
Patiod los
DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE
SUBJECT CE DOCUMENT
DOCUMENT IDENTLVICATION
RI PILA-NO.
G. DATE
T: BOURCE CAVATONTATA, DAVE DO UNPO. D. RUAGUATION
TiT: DAY!
DOCUMENT. DISPOSITION
what ther
• PRALIMENT INIORHATION
LCGIMOVE VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH
201-285412
SEXM
DOB
CIT
7
OCC 7.
050-008-010
HMMA:29544
20
JUL 66
R 6607281146
FILE IN 201-285712-
FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.
• 687
SECRET
68•488
---
## Page 39
DISPATCH
SECRET
TO
Chilet, WH Divlsion
25.5
PROCESSING ACTION.
XXX
MAND, CE NOTE
NO CATCHING BEGINED
INFO
Chlef, SB Division
FACA.
Chlef of Station, Mexico Cly
AN CROFILM
SUBJECT
REDOÖAT/LIMPROVE - Ecard YEBELMAN Freminger
ACTION RIQUIRED - REFURENCES
1. LIOOZY-5 reported that on 24 June 1966 bls KGB case oncer,
Valem in Sergeyevich LOCINOV (201-285412); stopped by bts affloe on
eglilmate bustness, then sold be had: some (operational) businoss for
him, LICOZY 5 demurred, but LOGINOV went ahead, took a plece
of paper out and began reading from it, asking LIOOZY-S lf he knew
Than an i not want to do in his hot h 2, 030 and he a co
want LIOOZY-S to do anything, it was just that he did not know who be was.
LIOOZY-5 refused to discuss it further. When LOGINOV left LICOZY-5"s
office he left behind a plece of paper with the following wrkten on l la
Eduardo Vebelman, about 55 years old, Mexican of Jewish extraction,
owner of a secl plant and a firm which selle photographle egiloment, Came
to Mexico during World War I.
Lives in the Pedregal at Teololco 320,
His son Is Mauricio Vebelman.
Station files led no traces on anyone named WEBELMAN: The
1965 Mexico Ciry Telephone Directory lists the following:
ArIo ®WEBELMAN, Arts Fotograficos, Uruapan 7, Tel, 11-44-77
Eduardo WEBELMAN, Teoloico 320, tel, 48-57-17
WEBELMAN Hermanos, S, 4., Paseo de la Reforma 308, Ist floor,
tel: 11-41-90 and 11-49-79:
• CONTINUED -
Distr butlon:
2 - CWH
CROSS REFERENCE 1O"
Cert
DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER
HMMA - 29477
CLASSiFICATION
SURET
20:: 7*5
5c 4-1/119
DATE 201-285412
14 JULY 1966
HOS TIRE NOMBER
201-
---
## Page 40
14-00000
SECRET
CONTINUATION OF DISPATCH
HMMA - 29477
3. The Mexican Cobemacion (ei ai Subjoct (apparently lemical
with LOGINOY's "Vebelman') was revlewed on ll July 1966, I shows that
Subject was born on 7 October 1917 In Warsaw,
Poland, (s Jewish, and came
to Mexico ou 8 December: 1939 as a student. la 1942 be had received
"Immigrante" statue and was working for Adolfo "WEBLLMAN Coelpe (2),
manager of WEBELMANý Clara flim then located at Aluminio 192 ta
Mexico, D. F. (Comment:: Adolto WEGELMAN le presumably a relative
of Subject's bur nac bis tather,,
who le given as Saymon WEBELMAN,)
The last entry in the tile la dated 1941.
d. Headquarters traces on subjact are requested,
fox/willard C, CURTIS
RA BID ZEUL LO
WVWE INUCE? WILINIED
SECRET
Page 2
---
## Page 41
''dad gen is"
DISPATCH
maRio 108 in74*i
1040 QUALIND ALLA
I CAN MODE INDENIAO
Chirte ni lavision
cust of sention, lexie re We
ACTION MIQUIRED - REPER
NEPTRENCE: 1394-301966 d6 Jinic 1068..
CIZ
OCC
•B".
÷:..
wit: Vitaly distantinerien tanny, 2u-355o0r) t
Perior fro" 27 May
Is 1 Jine
1966.
Ta roonre!
ilintificu
mean seres te croceed dishe
positionl
al 5i5 June 1900..
31 tiny
roceived
follOws LILYRIC suncillace rocits on Salaact have sunsecuently
0931 hrs:
1023 hrs:
1411 hrs:
ubige left the soviet: Crhassy alch:
subjera mirered the Serice tonger alame
Suhject list
the Sorict
Inhasey torether with Perry
Antonovich AlL e01-120225) mid dendaila Vasive Ditcr
(201-790799) in
in it
Subject
tral the soviet triass!
Subject
lo"i
the soviet
Embassy tich
alent,m
2 hine
1037 l:rs:
• 1145 kirs:
1606 hrs:
16156. 118*9:
1137 Wr
Subjeet interei the :
oviet massy
Subject left the soviet Eraser mit
KOVSTLTINM 1202-101799) in die lecteres co
istin,in.
Distritation:
AS REFPRINCE 1O.
SPATCH STEERA AND MUNGER.
• 1959
DisT
501.285-412
---
## Page 42
COMTINUATION.OF
DiSPATCH
SEC687
26*21
1021 Prs:
subjeet autorod. the Soviet talassy with YATeNOV in
the
latter; coi.
6 .June
7 turic
1040
has:
1413
hrs:
Rahiere entrrod the soviet Frasso alone.
subire ieft the Soviet arassy with alcasmor
Vladimrich pRimonta (201-202379) in the lotter's car.
subjrer retumal to the
subice: lot:
soviet irrassy with Myrsky in the
lntter's.car.
Subject entered cle Soviet Inhassy with YATSkO! in
(as not spen lesvinr.)
entered the Sovict Intase with Vasilly Stormovich
1053 hT VIRÖSNTKW/(201-275016} in tie latter's car Mobil
the latter's
g June
1130 hrs:
Subjeet entered the Soviet Inhassy with KONSTNTISOV .
and Sorin Tarascvich IZAROV (201-049257) in
KONSTANTINO'S Car.
1200 hrs:
Subject left the soviet Enhassy with MIROSINIKOV
me KaNSTATIVOl in the latters car.
1356 hrs:
retured to the Soviet latassy with MROS NIKOV
Rad MiNSTANTION
1405 hrs:
Suhjest arain left the soviet inhassy wich MIrosiNikay
ind NONSTATINOV:
The following infomation is mailable on the persus neitioned above
as being with suhjait:
do:
¡ONSTANTINO! iS ArON tO be the iGN resident.
YATSKOV is a inona KOB officer, probably in CI.
e. IndiOr is a lion lGa officer who works for Ya"Sank.
¿ PATRIODÃO iS a know iG officer ind prohably the deputy resident.
C" MIROSENIKOV is probably the jon chauffeur.
"RAZAROV is the mbassador, no low intollirence affiliation.
'SONOLINA is the wife di an Assistant itilitary Attache.
Pratherit Wrensing
did tof that i slee
: *530
---
## Page 43
C56
PROCESSING ICION
DISPATCH
SECRET
Chief, MI Division
Chief, St Division
81050
Chief of station, Mexico City
SUBJECT
REICHAT/UCI PROVE -EMeStO ClAZAND FerrinO
ICTION RIQUIATO. RESERENCE
REFERENCE: MEXICO CITY 7688
XXX
CATO NUDGE CACOXINO
Transmitted herewith is the local CREWY report on Subject which
was promised.
ODEvY still has not lem able to centact sulject in arier to
nut him in
touch with the station but hones te in so during the weik
of 4 hily.
Big id
for/hilllard C. CirTIS
Enclosure:
ODENVY Report
Distrihution:
2 - CHi,
Lt - C5B, M/enc1.
(2 conies), 11/4
(1 copy), l
COPY
Enciated tram sulana::
201-8:04124
CROSS REFERENCE TO
DISPATCH SYMBDI ANO RUNABER
13914 - 29125
CASSIFICATION
SECRET
ASE NEC: 13
DATE
30 SE
MOS ThE NUBIBER
196€
FFV: P=1.313
---
## Page 44
FBI REPORT (ATTACHENT TO IMMA 29325).
DATE: 27 JUNE 1966
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET.
SURJECT:
ERNESTO CHAZARO PEREGRINO
134-815 (6-27-66)
FROM MEXICO CITY
---
## Page 45
SUBJECT
SECRET
• 10)
DOCUMENT TRANSFER AÑD CROSS REFERENCE
DOCUMENT: IDENPIFICAPION
RO FILE NO:
OISPATEM OR SOURCE DOG. BYMBOL AS.
P. BOUNCE. CRYPTORYN D, DATE OF INTO.
10.
DI SEEM IRATRO 10
DOCLIENT DISPOSiTION
TRANSFERRED - PO
& DATE
STALUATION
PRALINENI
LÖGINOV, VALENTIN. SERGEYEVICH
201-285412
SEX M
DOA 8
201-355606
ИNMA-29198
16 JUN 66
CIT.
OCC
KNOWN
KGB®
201-395608
MEXICO•
IN CONTACT WITH V. BOYAROV
1 JUN DOO MEXICO CITY.
_6606240887
FILE IN 2012HEC/J
FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.
80$9
807 00.
SECRET
17088₴
---
## Page 46
14-00000
DISPATCH
CLASSIFICATIÓN
SECRET
PROCISSING ACTION.
airero 109 900
Chief, SR Division
XXx!
DO NOTINE BEGUEED
air QUALIntO ArSa
chief, kli Division
chiot of station, Hexico crie
CAN NOR MOCUME
RIDWOOD/LCIMPROVL • KGB and GRU Residencies in Mexico CIty
ACTION FROL
Attached are analyses of the XGR and GRU residencies in
Mexico City,
Included are only those officers who are prohibly
or known to be intelliyence officers.:
Of the 52 Soviets currently
assigned to Mexico. Ciry, 22 are idontified intelligence officers
and 13 probably intelligence officers, i.e. roughly 67% of the total
Soviet colony.
2.
The case officers have not neen
divided irto separate
taigot groups,
with the exception of KGB S&
in rie the Station's
information is too fragmentary for a realistic irration
With the
exception of s.
is. known
in nes tne NGB. residont,
the positions of resident and deputy resident are inconfirmed, but
ropresent the Station's best guess:
128.8
37.
for
Hillard C. CURTIS
LOGINOW
Attachment:
NGE and GRU Residencies.
Distribution:
:? • CSR, w/att. (2 copies).
i - Chil,
w/att.
(1
copy), i/r
i!:.
CROSS REFERENCE TO
28 April 1966
101-885412
---
## Page 47
•CROFILMEÙ
EAT 4 1085
0x2. 2520 352-
SECRET
2P
ATTACIENT TO MINA : 28808
DATED _2S APRIL. 1000
Nob Residency in Mexico City
April 1906
-.......
ECruSYE:
A. V. PRINIONAO (bnowi.so: 90%101
den gated it REM.
CP Liaison:
I. A. "RAZANISLIM (KNOW
responsible to
intelligence officor, possibly now
CP.SU rather than sGd).r...
A!14
lergaris
Case Offacers:
r..
ANDREYLE (suspect) -
PROVIN (suspecta
DOLGOV -Isuspoct
N
POKLITSYN (suspect):
FORMOSHNA (suspect)
AUCHEROV (suspect"
F
KUZNETSOV. (known)
LEONOV (known)irls:
VINIFOROV (suspect)?*
V
•G
P..
I
$
TISKO: (knonn)irri
TAÏSION (KNOWN+.
Sat Case Officers
* :
A..
Referentura
p.,
GULIA (suspeiry
V..
N. "RADVANSATY (ANONJA
Chauffeur
P. S. MiROSININOV (SUSpeELL
KRORA KGS:.
Suspect KGB::
Diplomatic Cover:
Immorcial Cover:
Pross. Cover:
tabassy Laployer:
---
## Page 48
SECRET
ATTACIMENT TO LINNA • 28803
DATED _ES NULL 1960
GRu Residency in Merico city
Resident:
V. N. SOKOLOV (Anown
April 1500
jee - 1'
lee poria"
Case Officers:
ail;
1. 1.
N. PENISOV (knOwn)
CORALOV (AnOIn).
V
KARABACH (suspoce)!
15295-
KHUMOREV. (known):
ZETROPOLSKTY (AMOW")
V
R.
SOLOLIN (Anowiii:
muciNti (suspect)
F.
FORONKOV (known)Cpr
Code Clerk:
I.V. YALFINOV (know).
- Chauffeur:
.V. P. KOROLTS (known)...,
KnOWN GRUE
Suspect GRU:
Military Cover:
Diplomatic Cover:
Commorcial
Cover
•Pross Cover:
---
## Page 49
14-00000
I-ICE TO FILE AO..
DESTROY OSi6.
MEXICO BITY
LLASSIFIED MESSAGE,
SECRET
PERSON UNIT ROTSEIRO
RIPRCOUCTION PRONIDITED
ADVANCE COPT
UNIT
& RID COPY
SECRET 1922502
¿INFO DIR CITE MEXI 7025
20 AR 66 0 00 064
REDWOOD LCIMPROVE
REF: DIR 95441
1• ACCORDING L'IENVOY 18 APR, IVANÁ..
tEKETOV CITED REF,
CONTACTED COSTA RICAN EMBASSY MEXI AND INGUIRED. RE STATUS HIS
VISA. HE TOLD CHECK LATER SINCE COSIA RICAN EMB STILL HAD NO
WORD: A FEW MINUTES LATER VALENTIN SO LOSINOV (281-2854122
ALSO CALLED COSTA RICAN EMB AND SAID HE WANTED VISA FOR
HIMSELF.
WHEN ASKED IF HE HAD DIP OR OFFICIAL PASSPORT HE SAID HE HELD
OFFICIAL PASSPORT. HE THEN TOLD TO BRING PASSPORT TO EMBASSY.
3. VISA PROBABLY FOR BEKETOV SINCE LOGINOV HOLDS. LIP
PASSPORT: LOGINOV VICE CONSUL AND SUSPECT KGB OFFICER.
SECRET
l.7025 95441 LIENVOY 18 APR. IVAN A. BEXETOU REF COSTA RICAN
E EMB NO WORD A VALENTIN S. LOGINOV (201-235412) EMZ DIP BEKETOV
LOGINOV DIP KGB
BT
SECRET
201.285412
---
## Page 50
SECRET
Chlof, SK Division
Corlef, Ms:
Chief of Statios, Mexico City
REDHOOU - RusteR O.
#BAANITOV (101-785564)
REFERENCLS:
8:
MEXI-0O31;
C.. CIR-90901.
As raporiod In Reference A., Subject and fils nife arrived
in Mexico City at 0550 hours on: 20 March is06 via Canadian Pacific
flight 421 fIon Buenos Alres.
They departed Mexico City at 1300
hours on 11 March
1yo0 via Cuna flicht 4o5 for davard.
tho mention of thoir departuro from Vexico City in the herspaper
clipping forwaried as Attachnent A.
on 10 March 19c0 Sovler Vico Consul
known kobi made reservations.
at the lotel. Agnes
in toxico City (frequently used by Soviots) for
a couple with a child for the night of 20 Karch 1900..
This
reservation was undoubtedly for Subjoct, however," thoro has beon
no oter nention of the child:
Ae 0830 on 2l March 1956 (Subject]
called the sovlet invassy fron the Hotel agnos and said be vould
liho to come over to pay perhaps for the roos and the Cutana eickets].
3.
LICALLA reported seoing Suuject at kho Soviet labassy in
Moxlco Clty at 1015 hours ou 21 Horch
1960.
Subject was seen talkiug
priucipally with tabassy Counselor boris Alelsandrovich, KAZANISEV
(201-028975), suspect CPSU representativo), aud also briefly with
Second Secretary Aleisandr Mikhaylovich DENISOV (201-726491) known
GRU, Ambassador Somen TAraSOViCh BALAROY (201-049257 and 40154l
Pavel Antonovich YATSAOV (201-120123, Anose K60),- At 1040- Subject
was seen entering the Embassy building with KAZANTSEV. through the
entranco which leads to the koferentura but also connects win othor
continued
Attachments:
A.
debsclip
B.
dolCAikA photos
Distribution:
2
CSR, b/att..
as stated, 1l/H
1
CHil, W/o atts.
w/o att
Xiet sheets nade LibiA - 28591
serace do 20 146.1160-2161
SECRET
Encadet too antinic
AV2379338 130
éle hagener 201
78
MARCH 1906
201. 085412
2П+-
#-*8
---
## Page 51
DISPATCH
10
• Chief, Va DIv18100
CDlof, SB Division
Chief. Of Statton, Hexico Clts
SUBACT
REDCOAT /CIMPROVE - Ernesto CHAZARO PerS
clea
TRON REQUIRED REFURENCES
REPRINCh: NNW-14816, 38 Angues 1908
PROKESSING
¡ANCO POR MORTIN
NO NOCKING REQUIRE.
ONLY QUALILO DESIR
CAN NOGE INOCHE :
The Station'e final report on Subjeet uns forwarded In
OTIA-29714, 9 August 1966.
for/willard C. CURTIS
рідної.
Distribution:
2 2 CHH
CROUP 1
20: 221
CS CoRE TO LH/1
CROSS REFERENCE TO
OISPATCH STREOL AND MUMBER
ENMA • 29913
CLASSIFICATION
ES GET FRED M 201-800413
DATE
31
MOS FRE NUMBEN
201-800412
AUGUST 1960
---
## Page 52
DISPATCH
SECRET
PROCISSING ACHION
Chicl, WH Dlylslon
INDEXING. BEGUIED
Chlef, SB Divlsion
Chiet of statloa, Moxico Ckÿ-
REDOOST/LCIMPROVE - EmOto CHAZARO Persex lo
REQUINTO REFERENCES
REFERENCE: HMMA -29325, 30 June 1966
•On 7 July 1966, Ling A. ORONSKY and a local representarte
LNERCO tirervlewed Subjoct In Veracruz, Mexico, It became.
obvlous at that rime that subject had fabricated mout of hla srory
as will be shown in the artached memorandum to local LNERGO.
2.: The Station has no plans for using Subject in any capacly
wha
for/Willard C. CURTIS
Attachment:
Copy of Memo to LNERCO
Dlerr but lon:
3 CWH, w/at (1 copy). H/W
¿ - CS, w/ate (l copy), H/W
CROSS AÉTERENCE TO
COPY
CASPATCH STATEDL AND HUMBER
HMMA - 29714
SECRET
13: 201=8004121
DATE
9 AUGUST 1966
nestring , 2 15 412
EEN: R-12818
---
## Page 53
14-00000
SECRET
21 July 1966
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
13 2227.
SUBJECT:
Emento CHAZARO Peregrbo
li. Referanco ta made to your memorandim dared 27.Jm
1906 and to the literviow with subject conducted in Voracrus on
7 July 1900 by
of your office and a
representative of this office. We wish to make the following
abdervat lons regirding Subject's atatementa ln connection with
la encounters wih Sovler Embassy Third Secretary, Valentin
SO LOGINOV.
3: Regarding subject's clalm to have vialted Mextoo Ciry:
on or abour 16 May 1906 and to have conticted the Sovlot Embassy
ou or abair 18 May 1960, thia office has establlshed the fact that
a contact es deveribed ly Subjoct ald noi take place at any time
đur log the parled 10 through 30 May 1966,
3. Subject made stremens to the olfect that ho had res
LOGINOV and a second Sovlet at an unknown restaurant at 1800 hours
on. or about IS May, He clalinod to bave talked to these two
Sovlete for approximately one hour (le. mill about 1900 bours)
atter which they lett the rescaurant, walked to and entered LOGINQY"s
car,
drove to an unknown apartmem near the Soylet kimbaasy.
parked the car and enered the apartment and then phoned three
collisirls who arrived vichla 20 minutes. Followtog the arrival,
ot the girls Subject escused himself and left the apartien abour
1900 r 1930 bours. To our knowledge there la no precodant for
the KGB using call-guis for the purpose and in che manner
deser thed by Subject.
Fails: d.?
9. aug if
SCURET
---
## Page 54
SECRET
Subject stared that he belloved that the automoblle
artren by LOGINOV. an automobile that be had seen several times,
bare the llcense number "67," Our recorde show that no Sovle
Embasay offictal or employee drives an automobile wuh the number
67 or 76. LOCINOV drives an automobile with Mexico Cliy
diplomatic license 19 DA.
Subject's statements to the effect that LOGINOY deapos lied
30, 000. 00 Mexican paradare sub fole account ta she Banco de
Londres in Veracruz as a "git for nothing" and then took
the money back when Subject refused it; ls not in keoping with
our exper lence with regird to KGB modus operandl. ALso,
laformat lon avallable to this olfice indicates that according to
established Mexican banking practices it le nos possible to set up
a checking account without the presence of the owner of the account
who mus slyn aignature carde lor compartoon wuh the signatures
on checks.
б.!
Subjecia general vaguances as to citen, times,
addresses and locationg in connection with bile encountera # ich
LOGINOV, in addirion to those points cited above, leada us co
the conclusion that Subject has labelented a large portion of what he
has stated. Thie office has little doute that be did meet LOGINOV..
In Yeracruz during carly May 1966 ln connection with the inlising
Sover sallor, but we cousider his account of contacts with LOGINOV
rubsequent to thia occasion as fabrication.
7:
In vlaw of the above and in view of Subject's statements
n july so the etlect that be had absolutely no dealre to becom
malved with perocanel of eltner the Sovlet or. American Embassle
and wished to remata completely "neural, this offce ts not
Considering using Subject as an Imormant of any kind
SECRET
---
## Page 55
CLASSIA..
166 N0.
PILE MINO HiT. TO. DRAMCH O
besTior Osie.
WENT 6410755
WHIS
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE
SECRET
PERSON/UNIS NOTIFIRO
35
REPRODUCTION
PROMIBITEO
214
O RID COPY
ADVANCH• COP
Dieuro Ronio uses
INFO
SECRET 230U2OZ CITE MEXICO CITY BUZN
DIRECT OR
REDCOAT LCIMPROVE:
1. EARLY MORNING 22 JULY LITEYPO-8 CALLED
COS AT HOME AND IN EXCITED MANNER SAID HAD URGENT
REQUEST.. HE SENT LIENVOY -2 TO SEE COS
TO ASK
FOR INFO ON VALENTINS, LOGINOV PROVING HE A
"SOVIET SPY" AND FOR LIST OF" ALL SOVIET SPIES IN
MEXICO." LITEMPO-8 VIA LIENVOY? SAID REQUEST
COMES FROM LIRAMA WHO PERSONALLY INTERESTED
•AND INTIMATED"WE MAY HAVE. SAME SITUATION AS
1959". & WHEN GOM EXPELLED TWO SOVIETS FOR CONTACTS
WITH LEADERS OF RAILROAD STRIKE).
2. SAME MORNING: COS PASSED A PAPER
." PROVING"
LOGINOV IS ACTIVE AND DANGEROUS KGB OFFICER AND
A LiST OF IS SOVIET INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS IN MEXI
TO LIENVÖY-2 FOR PASSAGE TO LITEMPO-8/LIRAMAS.
SEE HiMA 28390 OF S MARCH FOR REFERENCE TO
LOG INOV. APPROACH TO CHAUFFEUR.
3. LAITER SAME DAY COS RECEIVED PERSONAL
32 Jut 66 &2261
бостранн
Loginor
SECRET
701-085412
find.
---
## Page 56
td-nn0d
PADE TWO MEXICO CIlY SUedS COME i
LETTER FROM LITEYPO-S VIA LITEMPO-4 STATING:
LOGINOV HAD BEEN COMPLAINING FOR SOME: TIME ON
LACK OF POLICE ACTION ON RADIO ALLEGESLY STOLEN
FROM HIS COMMENT: NO CONFIRMATION FROM
OTHER STATIOSOuRCES). FINALLY CHIEF OF
METROPOLITAN DISTRICT POLICE, GEN. LUIS CUETO
RAMIREZ SENT OUT AN UNNAMED POLICEMAN TO
INVESTIGATE. ON 19 JULY POLICEMAN CONTACTED
POLICEMAN 5, 000 PESOS PER MONTH - TO WORK: FOR
HIM ON CERTAIN MATTERS"
POLICEMAN TEMPORIZED
AND ASKED HIS SUPERIORS FOR INSTRUCTIONS. MATTER
CALLED TO LITEMPO-8 ATTENTION BY GEN. CLETO,
LITEMPO-S INSTRUCIED THE POLICEMAN TO GO AHEAD
ON 21 JULY POLICEMAN RECONTACTED LOGINOV AND
RECEIVED. FIRST "ASSIGNMENT:" TO DETERMINE HOME
ADDRESS, HOME TELPHONE AND PLACE OF EMPLOYENENT
•OF NICOLAS JUAN BOSTROEN AND WIFE VALEVIINA
GRÚSDOW DE SOSTROEN, BOTH. VENEZUELAN CITIZENS.
1. LITEMPO-A OBTAINED FOLLOWING INFORMATIO SECRETS
---
## Page 57
2861
PACE THRSE MEXICO CITY SORO SECRET.
ON SOSTROENS FROM GODERNACION. FILES:
A. NICOLAS JUAN SOSIRDEN, 1915 IN ST.
PETERSSURG, RUSSIA, VENEZUELAN CITIZEY. EMPLOYED
AS " PIRECTOR OF PROJECTS" EY STÉPHENS-ADAMSON
DE MEXICO. FORMERLY SERVED. IN US NAVY.
SO VALENTINARÚSOON DE SOSTROEN, BORN
BRESLAU, GERMANY, FORMERLY LAS IRANSLATOR
OR TEACHER OF RUSSIAN AT UN, NOW. TEACHER OF
RUSSIAN AT IBERO-AERICANO UNIVERSITY, MEXI,
VENEZUELAN CITIZEN:
5. STATION TRACES:
ON 18 SEE LOSS OR RICHARD L. POTTS, AMERICAN
GENERAL PRACTICIONER MEXI AND STATION CONTACT
WHO RECENTLY RETURNED US REPORTED FOLLOWING
ON MRS. FOSIRDEN WHO HIS PATIENT: MRS. VALENTINA
BOE STROEM, 41 YEARS OLD, RESIDES CALLE CHRISTIAN
ANDERSOV 419, MEXI. WAS 50RN VENEZUELA, VENI
USS? THEN SALL CHILD, WAS IN STALINGRAD IN 1942.
RETURNED VENEZUELA AFTER WIL, NOW VENEZUELAN
CITIZEN, HAS RESIDED MEXI SEVERAL YEARS WITH BERRED
ARDS a 02 001 14190.9631
wenty aston
---
## Page 58
PAGE FOUR MEXICO CITY SO2A SECRET
HUSEANO U WHO FORMER SOV CITIZEN VOY VENEZLELAN
CITIZEN. COUPLE HAS INO JEENAGE DAUGHTERS.
HUSBAND WORKS FOR AMERICAN COMPANY VEXI.
NEITHER HAS CONTACI, WITH LOCAL RUSSIAN COLOVY
(SIC) SINCE DONT WANT JEOPARDIZE HUSBAND'S JOB.
BOTH SPEAK SEVERAL LANGUAGES. VIFE APPEARS
NEITHER PRO OR ANTI SOVIET. POLIS REPORTED ABOVE
INFO BECAUSE HE THOUGHT IT STRANGE DUE AGE
DIFFERENCE AND NÓ OBVIOUS CONVECT ION THAT YRS.
BOESTROEM RECOMMENDED AS PATIENT. BERINA JAVILA
MOLINA DE OSEGUEDA, AGE 64, WIFE OF DR. PAUL
•OSEGUEDA PELALA (201-88063)
G. REQUEST HOS TRACES ON BOSTROEN/EDESTROEM
COUPLE, ESPECIALLY ANYTHING WHICH COS COULD USE
TO ENCOURAGE LIRAMA TO EXPELL LOGINOU WHICH
IMMEDIATE STATION OBJECTIVE.
in BT.
---
## Page 59
14-00000
SECRET
Date:
November 24, 1965
TO!
Mr. Winston M. Seott
Henry C, Johnson
Legal Attache.
Subjeat!
Travel of Soviet to Mazatian
Your file #9808
This dorument is for the use of your
arcady caig auel neither in nor its
contents should to further distri ured
without appropriate authorisation.
Reference 1s made to your memorandum dated
November 2, 1965•
A rellable source at Mazatian, Sinaloa, has 1n
formed that the Soviet scientifio
ship LIRA, of 2,435 tons
and carrying a crew of 76, was at Mazatlan fron Ootober:
23-28, 1965•
Ariother rellable source advised that a person
belleved to be from the
Soviet
Embassy; Mex1oo, D.F.s
visited this ship while it was in port; however, he was not
Identifled:
аз.
# LOG/NOV
p- 11712
SECRET.
File
CROST 1,
Excluded dora sulematic
++07-0-08-999
399901-9
P-11712
---
## Page 60
3. Goate
005
25.
October: 1955
5. Fil
Valentin
INGIROV:
In their reply to a request we sent them for traces of
subject, our headquarters have revlied
as follows:
•. Valentin 'S, LOGINOV was assistant Haval attoché at the
Soviet Embassy in BUaNes itREs in 1960, and
was listed as
Attache in Havina in 1961-53, where his exact dutes
were. not known
. If he
now
assumes NSCHIPORENKO'S post
of Vice-Consul, his career appeare
to be an unusual one,
and he must be presumed to
be an intelligence officer"
2.
Does this check with your own inforation?
Rice from hath 37000.65
Reply a sterile boin
4) Cafy to 502-4)
Cry% 502.6
P-11712
COPIES MADE
---
## Page 61
4-00001
SECRET
$ November 1965
*C-Ma miip ste
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mr. lienry C. Johnson,
Legal Attache
Dinston M. Scott
Travel of Soviots to Mazatlan
1.
This office has recolved a report that two
membors: of the Soviet Enbassy. in Mexico City,
Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV and. Yovgeniy Nikolayevich
GORLITSYN, planned to travel. by air to Nazatlan on
2 November 1965;
The length
of their stay and the
This office would
appreclate recciving
information availablo to you on the trip of these
Soviets
THIS •INFORMATION: IS PROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE•
:IT
MÜST NOT BE: DISSEMINATED IN MIOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE
YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING
OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY:
0•9833
Distribution:
Original - Addressee
1 =-50-2-4/A
1
• P-11712
1
P-11163.
ECRET
histoul!
Ercltea tras aaiszalit
CUERETINOS TAN
HtLasal," sllarhe
---
## Page 62
14-1000
3 Hovember 1955
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
FROM: ORONSKE
SUBJECT:
LICOWL-1
сул. lo
P- 8451
P... 8588
Р - 1175г
Belon 1s a aunmary of the noteworthy items from bubjeot
during meetings with him in September and Ootober.
Lo: During September the meeting site was changed to the
stroots between Merida and Morol on Puebla atreet IniColonia
Roma. Subject walks along Püobla street and I pick him up
in the car and drive olsowhere for the meeting. I attempted
to change tho time of the meeting as well but. subjeot does
•not olose hie store untll just before 2100 houra each
day and feela that it would appear oda if he were to olose
the storo at various timos of the evening on different days
of the week.
ils wife to not always in the store and be.
would have to close the store in order to meet me. He
oloses at 1400 hours on Sundays. I also instruoted him to
change the speed of the recorder from 1 7/8ths to 3 3/iths.
We have no recorders in the station that will take a large
reel at 17/8the and this extremely slow spood is not
necessary.
2 During early September Subject commented that there
Is a new apartment building boing constructed on the corner
of Gelati and Gereral de los Santos, across the
atreet from
the Sovlet Embassy. (This to our now basehouse). I took
considerable notes on this as though I had never heard of the
P- 8764
P=8764
COPIES MADE
P-11712
---
## Page 63
pince deforo and asked several questions about it. Ro said
that the owner of the buflding.Is Sr. VILLAGRAN
and that
VILLAGRAN hag the reputation of being an anti-Communist
and a loyal Noxican ostizen. He sald that the bullding
would
probably. be completed by Mars: 1946 and that 1t w11l
have about alt floors.
several Sovlets have mentioned to
subject that they would like to rent apartments in the
building sinoe. st ls so olose to the imbassy.
3. Subject said that ISAYBY had been In his store about
the last week in September. (As far as I can tell this la
ISAYEVg first visit to Subjectis-store.) ISAYEV made a:
great many anti-U.s, remarks during his visle to the store
and blamed the U.s. for most of the world's troubles. At one
point he said that the Soviets made much better cars than
the U.s. and that Sovlet cars were bullt llke "tanks".
subject laughed at this remark because the thought crossed
hls mind that only a soldier would like to drive a "tank"
and from where Subject was standing at the time he could.
вее
the Sovietta" new fleet of American Fords and Chevys:
I: I again asked Subject why the Soviets bad not been
vlaiting his store in the evenings as they had in the past
and he inslated. that it was because most
of big "friends"
at the Embassy lad returned to the Soviet Union beginning In
July and their replacements had not warned up to him yet.
---
## Page 64
14-00000
site.
I nokod him 18 a amall flosta might not help this situation
and he sald that he thought that it might help. I toldi
him tó make plans sor a flesta in honor of Mexican
Independenco Day and to inülte an many of the new Sorseta
as possible. He said that he would probably give
the
party on Fridsy, 17 September,. I suggosted that he Invite
Turky ANDRIANOV (the GRU chauffeur) first and tell ANDRIANOV
to Invite soveral of his friends.
At the hext meeting with
Subjeat he reported that NIKIFOROV,
LOGTNOV and KORNUSHRIN
were the only Sovlets who came to
the fleste on the 17th.
They arrived, had a fow drinks, danced t
o some Russian
recorda which they had brought with them and then left.
(Ail are KGB types); They told subject that the other
Sovlets could not attend because they had to attend a Crech
Embassy reception that same evening. L I can find no record
of such a reception either at the Czech on Polish Embaaales
and there is no indication on the Soviet lines that they
had anything planned for that evening. A soviet from
Cuba arrived
on the 17th but we have no idea how many sovlots
were at the airport to greet him. I questioned Subjeet
about the Soviets who. had appeared at the fiesta and he
gave me a littlo information about them. They, visited his
atore several times in the next few weeks and I showed him
photographs of the men and expanded on his previous information.
He had the following to say about them lhe has previoualy
reported on NIKIFOROV).
LOGINOV: Subject said that he belleves LOGINOV replaced
---
## Page 65
14-00009
NECHIPORENKO (correct), Subject calls him "the Bull"
and
deseribed him as being vulgar, crude, 11l mannered,
ghort,
tempered and a tyrant. He is A person who thinks that ho
Is some sort öf a "big shot"
and when he sits down he
spreads ails lege and arms and takes up a space big enough;
cor to mori... His Spanish la very bad and ho smokes "pleate"
elgarettes. At the flesta LOGINOY told him that he was
from the northern part of the Soviet Union, is married and
has children. He claimed to have served in the Red Army.
- KORNUSHK IN:
Subject likes KORMUSHKIN who 1s friendly,
well mannered and outgoing. He speaks good Spanish and
told Subject that his wife likes Nexico.: Although KORMUSHKIN
was wearing glassea in the photo show to Subjeot, he
commented that be ofton sees KORNUSHRIN without hia glasses.
He smokes "Record" elgarettes and Subject oalls him
"El Jovencito".
5. Subject said that ISAYEV had dropped by his
store
during the week of 18 October and spent some time making
fun of the King and Queen who were visiting Mexieo at the
tines ISAYEV selt that the very existance or a king and
Queen in 1965 was silly. He also claired that the Soviets
had discovered
the Comet that was then in the sly. (The Comet
had actually been discovered by to Japanese and bears
their names. He bragged
about the great advances in the
Soviet Union in all flelds and told Subject with great pride
that the ruble was worth more than the
dollar. He commented
---
## Page 66
that the U.s, was a waring nation while the Sovlet Union
sought only poade and that the United States would ohange
to something dimilar. to the Soviet oystem In the near future.
6o the reat of the meeting and the next tro, hero spent
discussing Stanislav SILNIKOV and hia request that Subject.
not as "flador" on an apartment for him as well as supply
him with
a a prostitute. (800 IMMA-27548. Of 4 Nov.)
7. In addition; Subject said that ANDRIANOV had asked bim
to get Viktor KALININ some aphrodisiao pills.. ANDRIANOV
paid that they were "for Viktor KALININ In Moscow" but
subjeet thinks they are "for Yurly ANDRIANOV In Mexico"
subject sald he hasn't the slightest Idea where to buy
such a thing.
8. I told Subject to test the recorder by speaking into
the microphones both in the upstairs room as well as in the
main part of
the store and then to play book the tape.
Although RESCIGNO has explained the workings of the recorder
to subjeot several times, he claimed that he did not know
how to do this. I then Instructed him to disconnect the
recorder and to deliver it to me at 2100 hours on Friday,
5 November. I sald that I would test the recorder myself.
No asked why RESCIGNO could not come to the store and test
It and I told him that RESCIENQ was away. Me then asked if
RESCIONO Was a Mexican of an American. He said that RESCIGNO
speaks Spanish like a Mexican and looks like a'Mexican but
that ho (Subject) 19 sure that he was an American. I told him
---
## Page 67
14-00000
're data con licitiand no indian do to do items to iace
that I really didn't know since I had never asked him.
I ohanged the toplo.
of conversation by saying
that if be
reported that SILNIKOV wanted a girl for this Sunday,
I would reture the machine to
him on Saturday, 6 November.
"If not, he hould get it back at the next regular meoting
which I would set on Friday wien I moet him.
18-0-1
let tone
gettinte
..a...
not the to
.'.
";::
•*:,
interes t...
---
## Page 68
14-00000
SECRET
2 November, 1965
MEMORANDUM
FOR:
.. FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mr. lionry & Johnson,
Legal. Attache
Winston M. Scott
Travel of Soviot to Magatlan
1.
This office has received a roport that Soviet
Vice-Consul valentin Sergeyevich, LoGINOV planned to
travol to Mazatlan from
26 to 28 October 1905 by
plane.
The purposo of tho trip was to take mail to
of cod sips hech vad to for Lin Mazatian. The name
This office would approciate any information:
available to you concerning LOGINOV's trip.
THIS INFORMATION, IS FRON A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE®
IT
MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE
YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING
OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY.
• Distribution:
Original - Addressee
50-2-4/A
9808:
SECRET
68830 1
Essiolat 877 exterger
tresesu.t812
---
## Page 69
1o 1h9 C.0. ronunod aoqualntancoship with
Subjoot, and in the insediato and
olzablo väour loft by. Gerald F, Contotnor's doparturo, tried to establish a
sriondly rapport with Subjoot.
For this rosson the C.O. gave Subjeot a more
"Erlandly nano to know him by, lo1 bergor it being explained to subjoot that
Dol was the C.O.'8 trüe firat name. Subjeos thenht the cholon of targer i
mid, bonnino he heros norrral jeslo
of lot 8am
Mia. Do menodis allo geo
sologlunds in, and asking for Monicy.
P-7442
2o. Subject roparted that ho had cone baok to loileo sion a trip on 10 autuat l ula
Nochiporenko was at the airport to greet his. Nochiporonko had vialted his
offico proviously, and brousht along his roplacement "Valontin", and at that
timo had fourd out when Subjeot was expocted back. Nochiporenko was invited
by Subjeot to visit him at hid homa for broakfast on il lugiat. Ha showed up
wiel
the soviet tabasey, or in any othor way try to reach Sache. Subjoot had e
souvoris platol which ho had obtainod fron sono Caulolter (preaumably during
WIII), and Nechiporenso asked if ho might have it. Subjoot save 1t to hm.
Nechi porenko evidently arked Subjoot to arrange for a oño day trip to Paria
for hin while he was en route to the suetet Union from his stopover, Fussels.
(Subjeot complied, and notifled hia agent abrond.. Subject received a wire a
Low dayo ago that lachiporanio mas "no show" in Patle), Nachiporenko was not.
Interosted in Subjoot's observations of U.S. attitudes toward the Viet Naw and
Dominican altuations, although Subject had boen asked to note such attitudes
that Catalana foresi wao han worked previously in Sablect's office, who ned
(321)
attended the Maccan Soviet Cultural Institute, who had da boy friend the trerican
who was Elving daglich lessons to leantporenko (Garyodgoa
ang, and who hai
married sone loxloan and was now in Acapuloo with her husband. (works
at has Brisas)
would be able to contaot lechiporenko by mail to the Soviet Embasay in Mexico.
3a Subject is to call in when he is contaoted dy Sasha, His lino'to the Sovs
about the travel arency in New York will be that he binn't the time to select
complily intif contest. Ju
P-1171.2
---
## Page 70
the rangeer or somplete the
study of the offico'e roquirosente, but that do 1e
budois coine to hava it done. On hia parsonal affaire, sibfoct said ho mas
80116:40 nove in Decender to the Lomas, so a cordominium apartiento.
Attention "Paul"?
PRA
the G.O. would approciato knosing any collatoral info about
Neokiporenko's doparturo, the idontity of "Valentin", and
a triof pracia of Subject's Pornor associationa with ilichodso.
nat cotle in Late
Losining parsing
Twiel Ree Hechen even thie
Epilton tues Catalina Tori, polis
---
## Page 71
MANSOL.
VAF
---
## Page 72
STUJECT OF DOCUMENT.
SUBJECT:
Ernesto Canuano del. VECEsTO
and Mario Mante forte Toledo
LIENVOY Take
Mil11e godricuee
12. CROSS #CARASO TO THIS PILE
SECRET
1 Rope Foliot 899
DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFER-NEE
DOCUMENT
IDENTIFICATICE
AI FILE NO.
201
058
DISPATCH OR SOURCE DOC.
S+H804 40.
F:1 30432
B. SOURCE. CRYPTONYM
LTENTVOY
10- OISSEMINATED IN
DATE OF INFO.
18-27 Oet 561
P'::DATE
DATE PROCKSSES
25 NOw 1066
DOCUMENT DISPOSITION
1D. TRANSFERRED. TO
RA FILE NO.
PERTINENT ISFORMATION
248
#- DATE
I. Nov 66
•EVALUATION
• LOGINOV, Valentin Sergeyerich (201-285412)
DE. ALIASO MARTINE NEVAREE (a suatecalan) calls Soviet Concul IDitoV
to Invited him to a cocktail party
to be him at Nartinez' hori. Vertiner
hes Invited some inf tie. Russian sthletes participating in some r? the ine-
olymple sames and wishes Logiray to attend also; as well as she, Ambessader..
(all the Info found on logirion in thie icement)
FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.
fele J01siona
1201
285
117
SECRET
48• 488
---
## Page 73
DISPATCH
CLASSIFICATION.
8.
PROCISSING ACTION
MARIO FOR INDEXING
Chtes, SB Divielon
INFO
CaleR, WH Division
CAR FUDGE INDOXINE
FRONA
Chief of statior, Mesico City
MICROFIL
SUBJECT
REDTOP/LCIMPROVE - Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV (201-120123)
ACTION REQUIRED • REFERENCES.
I LiTKArO reported the return of subject
hts wife and
daughter Nins has renained in the USSR.) Subject and hlis
wife wore still trivelling on the same passports used when they
left Mexico in August 1966 (copies have been foriarded to
Headquarters) and Subject is still listed as Second Secretary
An his paasport.
The ohly addition to the passports 1e&
Mexican entry visa valld for sixty daye lesued on 30 August
1966 in Moscow.
Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412) has been
reported telling Lic0z7-5, LICol and LICANNY»I that he la
now the Consul Goneral, replacing Subject
- when LICOLY-5 asked
LOGINOV what he ma then going to do with Subject, LOGINOV said
that it was not his decision, but that subject would probably.
bo put In charge of some dopartment in
the Embassy.as First
Secretary.
The Station will keep Headquarters advised of any
Indications of the nature of subject'a prosent duties and
status within the KGB hierarchy.
3. During Subjectle absence on home leave, LILYRIC
reported that suspect KGB chauffeur Vasilly Stepanovich
MIROSINIKOY (201-273046) was been driving Subject's car a
fow times. : LICOUl also reported that MIROSHNIKOV was driving
• car with diplonntie plates 26 DA, which is Subjoct's car:
Distribution:
CSB
1 - CWH
CROSS REFERENCE TO
for/Millard C. CURTIS
ES COPY FILED:
IN
201-120123
Exched.
201-285412
LASPATON SYMBOL, AND NUMBER
DATE
HUMA • 30213
CLASSIFICATION
S BC
R
5
OCTOBER
HOS FILE NUMBER
201-120123
1966
---
## Page 74
FBI. DOCUMENT
DATE: • 20 SEPTENGER 1966:
CLASSIFICATION:
SECRET
SUSJECT ::
UNKNONN SUBJECTS; 10S BLUE FORD
FAIRLANE,
/ UTAN. LICENSE 'AR 1966: AT
SOVIET ENRASSY, NEVICO CITY, NAS 30,
66:
FAt FILE NO: NONE GIVEN (SALT LAKE CITY)
---
## Page 75
SECRET
on 80)
DOCUMEMT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE
TO. DATE
Da!& Proce
DOLMENT DÍSPOSITION
TOANB+EHHED:10
PLATINENT INESAMALISN
ECGINUV,
201-295412
•SEX
M:CO8.7
VALENTIA SENGAYIVICH
208-01947?
МанА діОгО!
OCC
7.
201-7734220.CAK
SEEN CHIVING YA•'ONALISSYNS
duL
FILE IN 201-2 837-12
•FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.
867
SECRET
---
## Page 76
SECRET
IrS. MUELLER recently
Inherited some money from
an uncle, VARROS
sald, and this is one of her ways of
spending some of It.
8:.
MUELLER's daughter Is.studying (third year of
college) In Vienna.
She is majoring
In Russian language
and Russian history there, That. Is where the "great"
Interest" In Russia comes from, VARROS sald. This daughter
hopes to teach when" she finishes school:
KMBARK
ON:
• Distributlong
Origi
Charles: G.
MUELLER P-
Valentin LOGUINOV PR
50-2-4/E
ECRET.
---
## Page 77
6 Japuary 1946
NEMOSANDIM FOR TiE RECORD:
FROM:
Oronsky
SUBJECT:
LICANNY-I (P-8415)
1. Subject 1s an official of
Tours which
1s a representative for Inturist in Mexloo Clty. We have
had no contact with him since
e July 1964.
At one time he
had given the Station reports
on various soviet tourists and
had been recruited prior to a trip to the Soviet Union in
connection with Inturist. During the past few months he has
been giving Don Lautz reports on various Soviet tourists
such as the Soviet Orchestra which visited Mexico and Cuba
recently. Lautz passed these
reports-on to me
and Cynthia
sent them home. subject sees bautz once or twice a week
In connection with visa matters.
He told Lautz
that he had
been contacted by KUBARK sore jears ago büt that due to
eno pressure of his buatness he did not have one ta write
reports or to act as some sort of Double Agent. He said he
was willing to pass along Information
on Soviet tourists
but did not wish to become an agent for both the Americans
and the Soviets. About
& weok
sago Lautz told me that
subject bad poported that valenten Loanor, Vice-Consit at
the Soviet Embassy, ad asked Subject to supply him with
information on boats and trains between Mexico and lew York.
Subject winted to know what he should do. I asked Lautz
1r Subject wanted to talk to me and Don said. that he did.
I then arranged to meet him in Lautz's'office at 1430 hours
6 January.
IP-885
P.11712
NUTILO MAUL
JP.8415
P-11712
---
## Page 78
2 =
He is well dressed and speaks native American English.
I naked him about his contacts with the Sovlets and he sald
that he had not had any extended contact with the Soviets
for some time.
During. August I9kS he was arnroached by
rApskov whom he knows as the Sovlet Consul and was asked
passenger
by him to prepare a chart of all commercial/ships operating
between Veracrus and New York City. "for the month of September".
He also wanted the costs of travel and baggage. Subject has
not given this report to YATSOV, (A copy 1s attached. )
During December he met LOGINOV for the first time. at the
airport while Subject was attending to the Soviet Orchestra.
LOGINov did not know subject and was very cool toward him.
until YATSKOV came by and greeted Subject warmly. LOGINOV
then beenme very friendly and asked subject's hame. LoGINOV
subsequently visited Subjectle place of bustness and told
him that he was the replacement for oles NSCHIPORENiO
(KGB Officer) and that Oleg an had sent regards to subject.
He said that he hoped that he and subject would be as frlendly
aa subject had been with oles. (subject commented that he
had not been especially friendly with NECHIPORENKO,) Subject
sald that LOGTNOV's Spanish is almost
native and that he
(Subject) was shocked to learn that he was a Soviet. LOGINOV
referred to YAISKOVis
request and added that he also wanted
Subject to include rail travel in the chart and ba was
especially interested in the cost of "excess baggage" by
rail. He also wanted to Include sea travel from Veracruz to Europe.
---
## Page 79
3: Sübject sald that he did not want to become a
Did but that he would be willing to supply seir whatever
Information he could concerning the Sovlots he dealt with
and the soviet tourtsts. I aoked Is ho would be willing to
surely personality data on LoGINOy inoluding LoGINov'a
background, education, family ote.
He sald that he would
be glad to do this. He said that he would not be able
to meet me on street corners or in restaurants and preferred.
to talk to me after he had finished his business with Don
Tautz.. I Instructed him not to discuss his relationship
with me with Don Lautz or with anyone else for that matter.
antxthat
He said that he would call LOGINOV and arrange to
five him the report and perhaps have lunch with him.
4. Subject wiil never be anything exceptional in the
Way
of an Access agent but I have asked Headquarters to
renew his POA.
---
## Page 80
Thru
CONT IDENTIAL
Ne.
Boone tra
Mintator Corolor
Jays: C/VIB
A. Cortoelno, C.C.
January 6, 1966:
LICANNY-I
A reproventativeof
rollable Information
In the paot called on me soday to rapert that
Nr, Logulner of the Soviet Embassy has requeated hía agency to pro
vide data on train schedulea fren Moxice to New York Cliy and best
- schedules fren New York City to Burope.
The Sevists vere particularly
Interoutod In the traln boggage allomance and the cost fer escaos
baggage, he aald.
Logulnov do a raplocement for Olog Neciperenico she mo: recently
transferred fren the Sovier Babasay in Manico City.
My: Infornant-d0-.-
ecribed him an tall; blond, bluaeyed, about thirty geare of ago, and
ao a person no apeake fluent Spartah without any decont.
ce: P/2
P-11712
CONVIDENTZAI
---
## Page 81
notes
25. NoV
KADIDDLE might have been at Perla'& Thanksgiving party. I know
PRIKHODKO and KONSTANTINOV were Invited, possibly KUCHE ROV
but. I can't find the names of the others.
The description of the tall brunette sounds like LOGINOŸ.
The other one
sounds ilke PRIKHODKO: I wiil get out photos to show DIDDLE.
P-11420
* anger p- 5237
29 Dec 1965
---
## Page 82
de t
the fire
i Possed-l
Thank Tris
Contaos Reports Noting botreon Elgobrook and jadídulo, 28 Debomber
cOs
On 28 Dooombor I onllod on Kadiadlo at his realdenoo, primarily for
tho purpodo of petting up an olomontary codo ayato vitaliar, and to
arrivo at salary arrangonnato with him.. Salary vas Sirod at 150 por
month, (olightly above what doors had puggested) and plus 6100 alloavance
during the duration of bie tour hore as Ambassador. As heid previouely.
roquoutod, I roturned to hia blo rooolpt for 35,000 poads, valob ho inatantly
burnt in an ashtras, with obvious rollor.
Ho commontod tast he hopod ho
would never hava. to sign anothor, and 1t is oloar that there may be some
oblon in vorking out a pold aokorlodgowonte I will loave 1t foX latory
wiit cortity the i Jan vaymontand ticy it on the following month. I askod
han do ho had boon having problomo with hae poncoioned about taking money
Fion the norloans, and he rophlod that he lead not been ablo to loop the...
night after our firat paymont, but aftor talking the whole matter over with
hio vito (the strongor porsonality of the tro) ho bad finally rosolved it
In bió minde friende bad to help one anothor, and 1f soceptod the Anerione
aa miah - malot has alaya done - he should not be too proud to let too
bail him out of a tight pot, "They were soing to turn off the cleatriolty,
and there was only a thousand peson left in our bank abount"
His conno, we agroad. to call in bla wife and consult together.. She
was nore than sensible about holping, copognited both the uses and dangers
of the telephono, and nado sono usoful suggestions, Porsonal contaot,
- ..
banod on social rolationship, in the bario arrangement) either at'hle
house of mino.;
Tolophone cortaot to bo only betwoen his wife and mine,
It of ther of the two women oall and suggest seeing one anothor at any hous
botwoon five and 17g '1t means that oithor I an to oall on hiddle at that
koer or ho on no, depending on the contest of the convereation. Any
othor hour mentioned aignifion pooial contaot botwoon the vomon themsolvos,
who are, of course, available to pass written messagon. Baorgenoy contaot
9.2770
---
## Page 83
can do mado by Diddlo himsell, oalling only froa @ pu tolophono, novor
fron bla houso or pit100.
In rogard'to CE affaira, Diddle made tro comonts whioh ho ouggonted
I might want to. Ago up wita Enobye
Ho sokod us If I had not or talked with Noel LIndal, at
(vico Prosidont of Grant Advortlaing s A) at the dinnor hassa Diadlo rayo
Chrlotues nicht, and on louring that'i had, he commentod that lindeayo
oultivation of hii had boon to anaiduous that ho was beginning to wonder
18 ho was not dooling vith condono who meht bo visualting hirvels no bla
futuro brition bado offloor. Thore was nonething about lindear, ho malde :
that node him fool that ho way anuonsing Diddlo quito oarofullye lio aakod
1s no oould run'a file ohoos on Lindosy himsolf and on Grant idvortloing.
I patd I would shook.
Poarl Conzalo% has boon purouing hin much too cotivoly,
ahking him to hór house out of turn, ranting to do a procilo on hin for tho
Inclion languago lova, of whioh tho 1s the soolety editor. Wat a portoot:
over for soguiring blo data, ho oxplainod, and what odd friondo no had
for an Morion, (aho 1o llated an a US natlonal in the inglo inorioan dir-
potory, and 18, acoording to Didald, olther neparatod or divorood from d
Moxloan huaband) newupaper wonan or note One evoning a month or
so a80 ho
had gone to dinner at her louse, found mout of the other suouts ajod on
that thoir way rather uncorotoniously; and was loft with only Mru Gonsalo%
and to non, whop, he found to his surpriso, vexo both Ruselane (namen not
rocalled, and nover very olearly given during the initial flurry of intro
duotions) •
These two ongagod him in serious conversations
Ruentanas How do you fool about Communion?
---
Diddler There is sonothing to bo said for miny 18 not
o11 the important systems undor which various oountrius are governed, hovever
ny primary conoorna lu not vita Communion in the abstraot, but with the
bout way for thana, to be sovorned.
No munt take the boat of all, and flo
whom to our country.
---
## Page 84
14-00000
Rusaland:
7o, no, the quention do wbat do you
think corsonally about Commundan? What are your omn D9110re?
Diddior (getting shulad ub at tate palat) Tolbertly,
I quet do desoribod as a nationallat..
LOGINOV
aged about 38.
ono os the useland was very tall, brunette, wayy
thia bedrenot obvloualy Rubalan in appearanco, very good-looks. The
PRiKHODKO
other was aiddle boight, doop linos running from the corners of his none
vortivally down his obooke, not so handeone, ago about 42. Diddlo led not.
êcan then sinoo, al though he has kopt an eye out for thom; cursing hlazolf
for not having their names..
Convorastion in Englaih - whioh is scout al
Diddle has, othor than Fand and sone German. He boldoves he would do ablo
to. Identity them from photographe.
Dladlo'e point in reviewing this in tae not to
not ne know that there were Russians looking him over-re both well avare
1of that - but to point up Mre Gonnalos'o rolo so a spotter. He does not
think that sho could have boon unitting of the role she was pleyles, and
has avoided her singe.
Regarding indreyev, he sussented that I oultivate him, and on being
told that I plans a dinner on 8 Jan (to whloh Diddle Invited) for about
18 people, he carmented that it would be an excellont opportunity to nice
aal andreyer as irell: Doubtful, of sourse, that he would aocopt, but no
opportunity to continue hle exposure to un should be overlooked. de made
the usual comments conderning Adrejer's difforences. Don his colleagues,.
nadins only that A bad told hin that he was basloally intornationallet:
Inousloake As otharo, ho sondes sorothing wrong In d's relationello vita
hia vife. (Comments. I diat do not, as yet.
She did not appoar conrortable
did not Ilke: trist, trug & cotora, but
they soomed to be on good annugle
tores. Fo vas pushing hor join in, but not impatiently)
... Didalo ancod for EDI'a on the tel-continental congronay a number of:
Ghanians will be transiting hostoo on their. vav_to and from lavanay. ho....
Baba poolfoady mentioned Donortonoo, Yoon do dogoridod as an anti-
---
## Page 85
alice
¡crunal Ghandan onployod an a o1ril/ corvant do the UN, and not montono do
Hould have expoojad to bo nerod as a dolosate to the conforondo, and Joan
sottogal, whom he cald vao a "orypto donorat" at agart, and not tho anti-.
vostorner ho la uoually donoribod as boins.. What Tottosch wood to bo, and
what ho rolly in at tho promont tino aro two quito differont thingo. He
than booome a friönd, nave ki-b, although ho cannot appoor me su.
"I told him that Rattesoy would be coming on tho sixth, nore or 1008,
and that I vould got bla a 11ot of roguiromonte for the Conforenoo
White
Dillon
91206i P- 11070: 9
---
## Page 86
1d-0d0d
SECRET
.. Date:
December 21, 1965
To:
Mr. Winston M. Scott
N. L. Ferris
Legal Attache
Subject:
TRAVEL OF SOVIETS TO MAZATLAN
105-4900 (12/21/65)
This document is for tho de ef your
sirne caly and neither it nor. its
crients should he fucker distributed
-withat appropriate auchorization.
Reference is made to your memorandum dated
November, 5, 1965; your #9833, and my memorandum dated
November 24, 1965.
A reliable source stated that Vice Consul
VALENTIN S
LOGINOV, Third Secretary of the Russtan
Embassy,
had been at Mazatian, Sinaloa, Mexico,
bring mail to the Russian ship ISKATEL and had left
Mazatlan
On December 8; 2965,
on CHA jet flight #911
at 3:45 PY
,m., en route to Mexico, D.F.
This same source stated that the above person
visit a Russian ship, belleved
to have been the VENUSHTYELNYI, in November, 1965
SECRET.
Group
Excluded from
Automatic
Downgrading and Declassification
---
## Page 87
CONEIDENTIAL
Dalo:
.To:
From:
Subject:
core: 21, 190
So Winston di. Scott
V. I.
Forris
Lobal Attache
Russian Ship ISKITEL
105-1970 (12/21/65)
Ha.
A confidential source
at Mization, sil
Mexico,
advised
that
the Russinn
Kl0i,
Ship
ISKATEL arrived
laxatlan on Decorber 3, 1953
and
Deceibei 9, 1905.
dopajeed.on
This ship
was. listed
as being a
scichtific motur ship and carried i crow od 32.
Thie
abore source made available a copy o1
thie cicw list of this vessol, which is enclosea.
A socond confidential
sourco at lazatlan stated
that Vice. Consul VALENTIN S- LOGINOV,
Third sociotary of
the Russian Enbassy:
had boon at inzation to bring mail
to this ship and ind left
Mazatlan on Decenbor. S,
1955,
on CIA jet flight FOll at 3:15 p.m., en route to lexico;
Enclosure
її
CONFIDEITIAL
GrOUD. I
Excluded from Automatic
Dongriding and Declassification
---
## Page 88
1d-0d0d
1l February 1056
&STORANDUS FOR THE RECORD:
PACK:. Oronsky
SUBJECT:
LICONL-}
..!-
1. I met Subject on Friday, 11 February at 1900 hours. The
meeting hag a very short one
since I only wanted to
determine
Ir he had found a giri for SILNIKOV to "paint"
sald
was still looking.
2. The boy who watches Subject's store at night did not
up on 7 February, and Subject was forced to sleep above
the store himself.
waS
At 0300 hours on Tuesday (8 February) he:
awakened by the noise of a
car horn and looked fron the
window to see Valentin'S. LOGINOV and Vladislav S. KORMUSHKIN
-blowin the horn of their car in the driveway of the Embassy.
Both Sovlet's were drunk and were yelling for the gato guard
(bino naprened to be SILlIKOV)
over the rate for them.
They were driving car 337-D (LEONOV?s)
or. 336-D (KORNUSHKIN'S).
Subject returned to his
bed and-did not see them leave the
Embassy.
3.
Since both LOGINOV and KORMUSSKIN live in apartments
outside.
the Embassy and since they sould not willingly go
to the Embassy at 3 a.m. while drunk, It is likely that they
were working when they got drunk and therefore had no fear
of being reprimanded-for ite
They risy. have returned to the
Embassy to make a report or
to secure
some classified materials
before going home.
Both men redlaced known KGB officers
and both work under Pavel YATSKOV.
4. I set our next meeting 24 February..
COPIES MADE
P.1112
---
## Page 89
14-00000
LIMITED, 7 Feb 1966
Man driving black Opel with plates 22-82-62 of DF was at Soviet Embassy
1707-1740 hours thits date. LOGINOV saw him to the gate. (re vIsa???)
cur )
Placa Ne. 22-82-62-Expediente Nº M/552/421521-0p01-170394385-Sedan mo=
delo 1962 dado de alta en Marzo 10 de 1965 a nombre de CELIA BAYARDI
TORRES con domicilio en las calles de Arquitectos Nº 46 de la colonia
Escandón en Tacubaya D. P.
211712
---
## Page 90
14-00009
SECRET
3 February 1966
MENORANDUN FOR:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mr. Nathan
L. ferris,
Legal Attache
Winston M. Scort
Travel of Soviet
This office has received a report that the
1°y1eo-Consul in Mexico City, Valentin Sergeyevich
LOGINOV, planned to fly to Mazatlan
Sinaloa on 1
February 1900 and renain there until s February 1900
in ordor to attend to the Sovict ship Unushitelyy,"
which was scheduled
to dock in Mazatlan at 0800 hours
on 2 February.
1966
Any inforastion avallable to you on LOCiNOV's
trip would be appreciated.
THIS INFORNATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SCURCE.
MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE
YOUR OFFICE
WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING
OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY:
10097
Distribution:
Original
- Addressee
=50-2-12A
P- 11712-л
SECRET
AP
---
## Page 91
howe
peil ro
27 Jan 1965
MEMO FOR RECORD
• FROM: Marvin A. Cibor.
SUBJECT: Sov let Attendance at PRI Lecture
71,
1. On the evening of 26 Jan 1966 the following Soviet Embussy officers
were identified as artending se a lecture glven by. Prof. Jose VAZQUEZ Amaral
on the subject of "Tire Éxperlencos of a Mexican Professor In a Unlversity
ln the United State.i*; Svyatoslav Fedorovich KUZNitSOV and Valentin
Sergeyevich LOGINOV. KUZNETSOV was seated on the dals behind the
principal speaker.
LOGINOV was seated in the year portion of the
audience.
There were six U,S. Emussy officers present.
P-
- 11712
p-8102
-11712
---
## Page 92
14-000
SECRET
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
FROM
COS
SUBJECT Valentin LOGUINOV:
21 January. 1960-1
vile
Dila
сурк
recuriche
2.
VARROS sald he would, unless we asked the contrarys
Tell Cristobal TORRES Ponce
not to show up
for the meeting.on
24 January with LOGUiNoV.
ASk TORRES Ponce to report any and all
subsequent approaches.
ите). th
-Distributions
Orig w/atti
1. w/0.8.
On base lies contat
safely
Cist Libinos
Valentin LOGUINOV P-
walipis
W.
SECRET
---
## Page 93
TO STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
TO
•Roglonal Security Officer
DATE: JanuATy 21, 1766
FROM :: Frinelsoo Ding Gomer
Seourity Assistant
aujieT: Criatobal TORRES Ponce - Enbassy. Chauffew
Xesterday noon Is. TORRes came up to my offiod and roported that
-ho was sent to the Russian Embassy In ordor to Dick up ldes. MuELLER's passport
and that he was approached by Valentin'S. LoGulNoV,
3rd, Socrotary, who asked
him 1f he would like to go to Russle and that if ho would like to rocolve.
Rossian magazines and that if the U.S. Embassy uses to send comebody to follow
its enployees when they go some place in coin and that this individual
finally invited tr. TORRES to have supper with him next Monday, January 244,
2966, and that they will neot one oach other at the corner Insurgentes Sur
with Baja Calfornia, undor big advertisenent "CANADA", at 1830 hourg.
Mr. TORRES also commontod that this Indiridual told hin that in order
to got a Visa for Russia, takos timo, bocauso thoy haro to call Russia In order.
to get suthorization, sane proçoss
the U.3.. Embasay does when the Russian.
Elbassy roquento a Vles for one of the mmbere of Ita Staffo
Buy U.S. Savings Bords Regulaily on the Payroll Savings Plan
---
## Page 94
... i:
Valentin V. Zozieince
.....
; : ."
taalondoet air.onmnn
---
## Page 95
Imagitas y baga colo torre.
6 % fus =
---
## Page 96
SEGRET
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
FROM
17 January 1966
KUBARK ONLY
SUBJECT 3 Charles G. MUELLER, U.S: Embassy (Economies
Section) Officer
Reference Is made to LIENVOY (three conversatlons
soviet Embassy officer.
U.S. Embassy) wich Sovlets concerning a proposed visit
by Subject's wife and daughter to the USSR.
Paul Dillon and / advised Minister Boonstra (who
was Acting Charge) on 14 January 1966 of this proposed
visit and.of the conversatlons we had learned about.
Mr. Boonstra had not prevlously heard of this
proposed visit of Mrs. MUELLER to the USSR.:
He sald he
would (without divulging CAS as the source) look Into this..
Later on 14 January 1966, Mr. George VARROS told
the proposed trip.
• He sald the Ambassador had
personally approved: It (Mr. Boonstra
later also confirmed
this)
VARROS also said he thought It "not good" for
About anyti only eye, ay the one about. o
He sald (Confidentially)
example, she told at a party (when she was practically
"Blotto!) about MUELLER's"taking pletures all over Mexico
for CIA!"
{defia Vanes he prong i be travelling on
MUELLER a pre-briefing;
She will
(and VARROS thinks
Is wrong) be travelling on a
diplomatle passport.
SECRET
11712
---
## Page 97
1d-0d0
SECKI T
- 1.98 07.
•DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND
CROSS REFERENCE
• нак то.
0. Orpio 090000069
• Deto no sino. O 909188
COCUNENT OISPOSITION
01 #0.
LOGINOV
VALENTINE S-
2012054122
SEX M DOB Y
CAT
OCC
3AD
SEÇY• VIGE CONSULA
050-008-010
MMMA -20372
124
1t8 60
AOL PL.
R 6603082384
FILE IN 20T-2554/2
PILE THOS PORM IN PIGE NO.
+°# 087 +00 08600098 808000800
SECRET
201-085412
---
## Page 98
SILNIKOV arrived about 1330 hrs and had a
drlok
of tequila.
a hiph levol Soviet came Into
the shop and after he had left
Is studying Spanish in the Embassy.
(This followed Subject's corment
to SILNIKOV that the Sovlet spoke very good Spanish).
- SILNIKOV
said that eaoh Wednesday all the Sovlets must speak Spanish and
those who refuse to do this must pay a fine. crNIXOV sa1d -that
With the fine money
they: buy more Spanish: booklets and records.
there are some Sovlets who simply refuse to learn Spanish or
Mexican customs and that these people will probably not be sent
abroad again.
Commented that this would be a shame sinoe Mexico
han such excellent beaches, weather and everything is so Inexpensive
here..
He left the shop about 1430 hrs.
Subject was about to
olose his shop at 2100 hrg when Valentin S
• LOGINOV came into
the store. He asked If he could use Subject's phone and ther
made a long distance call to Cuernavaca and spoke to someone 1n
Spanisb®
Subject could not heer what was being sald but got
the phone number - Cuernavaca 2-30-55*
(I told
Subject to bring
ne the phone bill when It arrivea so that I can double
number-
check the
Sauces Licowe-r
Contect reput 12 Agil 66
P-11,712
---
## Page 99
14-000
SECRET
25 March 1966.
CONTACT REPORT
SUBJECT:
1. Subject called me on 23 March to report that he had
learned a little which might interest me
No made an appolntment
to meet in his office at 1700 tho same day. The meeting lasted
for 20 minutes.
2i. :
Subject stated that at 1200 hours on Sunday, 20 March
LOGINOV came to the French Club.
• He was accompanied
by his wife
whose salient features were,
redish hair which. could be died and
very generous proportions,
"a typically stout Russian woman.
Theye was also another Soviet couple wich them.
The man was
described as vory blond
as tall as LocINov (cars boyish haircut with a part, not quite
with a solid muscular build, like
a weight lifter.
• His apparent age was. 25 to 35:
His wi-fo was
dark haired, normal figure and also young. The two couplos had
three children with them all in the fo bracket.
Subject did: not
remember their sexes sinco he was concentrating on the adults.
(COMMENT:
I
first thought that the second Soviet would be KORMUSHKIN
but. Subject insisted that he did not wear glasses (KORMUSHKIN
always wears glasses).
GORLITSYN
Subject's description fits
and wife perfectly.
However, will take platures to the next.
meeting for.
conflimation,
Subject stated that upon arrival the two men went into
the locker. room
and emerged In shorts.
The women were alrcady
dressed in shorts.
"They had their own badminton rackets. and
repaired to a side lawn where they played badminton until Subject
at 1330;
During the period 1200 to 1330 they did not contact
anybody but simply played badminton among themselves.
lot noting the mayin subted Picted Locitoves car in the parking
license plates:
Subject was apologetic about the paucity of his information
but I encouraged him and told him it
was
a fine
said that he
had briefed his wife on LÖGINOV
and she
Subject
she will be.on
the lookout for him during the week.
Subject appeared to be very
much interested in pursuing this subject for me and gave every
indication that he will keep working on it.
Paul Dillon
File:
p- 12330.
Ф-11712
P-11163
SECRET
---
## Page 100
SECRET
22 March 1966
MIMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mr. Nachan L. Ferris; Logal AEtache
Winsion N. Scott
Soviet Intolligence Services
65-465
1. Referonce 1s made to previous correspondence
concerning the captioned subfoct.
A sensitive and rollable source advised that on
Tuesday, 1 March 1960 an unidentifled young girl who appeared
to be an American visitod the Soviet lubassy in Mexico City
fron 1202 - 10:1218 hours.
source advised that the girl spoke
to Sryatosláv Fodorovich NUINETSOV, First- Socrotary of the
labassy and vith Valentin Sergeyevich Lucinov, Third.
Socretary and Vice Consul of the Labassy.
; Both are KGB
officers. While talking to those two Sortets she was seen
to write something in a notebook whici
she carriod inside a
folder. Attachod is a photograph of this sirl.
THIS INFORMATION IS FRON A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE: IT MUST NOT
BE DISSEMINNTED IN WOLL OR IN FART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT
PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE. IN MEXICO CITY.
4 10263
Attachment::
Photo
Distribution:
Orignal - Addressee
• t/att.
50-2-4/A.
w/att"
• 50-8-10/11, w/att;
P- 8102, W/o atz.
210/0: 810
Meno Chron
SECRET
declateli/catica
---
## Page 101
10 d'arch 1966
it ninet
111 biar 1930, Diad's orfie
Runs reporerd that on 16 l'ir he ano called at his office hy Valentin Lorinor,
atio ond ho flat munted to have lunch eith subj and talk, lordney ernirt in not
ind luncheon for 17 inr, mit sin; decurred and the noot uns ont for 10 lar.
Mud rent to the lason la borde irataurent on Hollvar Callo (ineidentally, Lonnov
jaid tic check, being more prone to take the
tab than his piedecensor Alokonndr
Trikhodko).
They talked for two hours, most of that time taken up by lonnoy in a revien
of the world ritation for subd. locinor Intinated to Suhy thint he wanted Suig
to be au courant and In the know on political eventes. Ho apoke of the Sino
Soried aplit,.
entioning the widely known reasons for the split but correnting
specifically. from the Soviet vienroint on the Chinese hero-worship of lao toe fun;
sile implodyencoo and hollrorency. of China ca compared "ith the Soviet Unionin
inculne policy of decking peace. ie mentioned that China had had. a break in the
ant two sourg ly hovin; abundont harvents. He said that hardly a Communiat Party
In the world non aupport Hod China, nentioning apecifically on those that do the
Mccralion, dew brolond and Vint dan'prties.
He concitod ot lenith on the Indonesion situation, blaming the Cilnese for
having reduced commintot strength in that country. He snid that a hundred thnusand
ra Communtata, in Indononto hod bren illed since lagt October.
In like voin he comented odversely nibinst the Chinese in the recent overthrow
cia of lictuma in Ganna®
ile apoke of the upcoming Coniress of the CPSU at uhich he said would he
COPI
that thrushcher had done many good things for his country but that he was a mon
who relied too wich on his collible judsment.
He comented about France. He said nothing about the U.S. /Comments The
C.O. asked Subj to prepare a precis on the topica covered and the main soints that
Loginov nade about them.
2. Ro operational mattere losinov asked Subj if he had prepared the anorers about
the personalitios in the foredon office and the Resiatro Civil, Subj sald he hadn't,
and losinoy asked him to have then ready for their next meet.
cy. to P- 11112
CARDED P-2112
117/2
---
## Page 102
14-00000
1229
Suhy told Leinor ajnut an speomina trip to Copenharen, which he la to
undertore in behnlf of the chief of lexican Teurion, mustin solvat (oco
astuched leterr). Locinor asked Subj, 1f he vere in Paris, to 100k up
Ginnita Polner Tortur, nico pi do trition 1a70 official.
Subf said ho
"Time mure of beir in Parin, but ho would. try to see her ar he noco thero.
Mosento Suil plans to leave l'exico on 23 liar, travol to Brusele
and insterdan,
ve in Gownhnich for the Concreas on Concress caniantions
• from 30 lor to? 455•
continue on lucinces to Vienna and Parto, Thero lo no set date for hio retum/.
Loinov Inuired If any of the employes of subj's offico snoke Enrich,
indentin, that if they did they micht be able to min employment at the i.s:
saunay in lexioo. subd volinteered nor ready inferration to lonnoy shout his shie
enj.lrigoos.
borinov said
he would call Subj for their next neot.
3 The 0.0. told Subj to primro a superficinl peracnality resume on the persons
wanted ly lostrov (thiu for prior jubmiosion to the Station). Alno, while in
Turia, at it le not too much trouble, try to see Giretta Palaces-for thó purpoo
ni having some little to report to losinoy (naturilly mre-checked by the Station)
and aloo for the Station's benorit to discem if the Scriote abrond hnd made any
överturen to her.
40:
Subj parentheticolly remarked to the C.0., in a loosely defined manner of
howing the ectivity of the Israell Embasay in koxico, that there nao to he
a Congress it Intellcotuals in Mexico with about fift porticipante from ali
over latin merico.
The mafor theme of the Congress was to be The Situation of
the Jews and Anth-Semitiem in the soviet Union, but the theme was being held
under cover as far as all advance fublicity was concerned. (Attached in the
anncuncement card for the Conrass) Subj'e fira is handling the arrancerents.
So The CO, vill contact subj on 22 ver prior to his departure abroode
to the C.0.
CARDIO
sidenduns Subj renarked/after his long talk with losinoy that he regarded
Lo: Inov as a better intelligence official than Prikhodko, much nore savvy,
and that he must have been in the intelligence cane longer than frikhodko..
Subj sinid. that locinor had told him that he mould show subf pictures of the
places ne hod been in Lotin Arerica.
COPIES MADE
---
## Page 103
SECRET
16 March 1966
MENORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
CONTACT REPORT
SUBJECT:
l. Unon receipt of POA on Subject, I called him at his.
office
on 1l March 1965 and made an appointment to see him
at 1300 on 14 Narch at the office.
I had met him
socially in the fall of 1965, he remembered me which facilitated
the contact:
I met with him from 1800 to 1835 at his öffice. He took
ime to a back office where we conducted the conversation.
stated my business. briefly that. I knew LOGINOV was a member
of the French Club and' I desired information about his activitles:
He was in immediate ngreement to help
me in any way he could.
and contacts at the cluby have him LoGInoV's full name, physical
description, type and license plate of his car and showed him
pictures.of
LOGINOV and his wife.
Subject said that he had not seen LOGINOV at the club
nor heard his name:
He is sure that LOGINOV. is not a tennis
player which is Subject's only occupation at the club.
Subject
said the only goes there on Saturday afternoons and Sunday
Thences with the children swore a red eate othering
the children."Subject agreed that both he and
his wife would look out for LOGINOV.: At my suggestion he agreed
to make inquiries about LOGINOV from Club employees such as:
the manager or the 'bar tender who know everybody. He agreed to
mask his interest by stating only he had heard that à Russian
was a member and to express normal curiosity about this unusual
Subject immediately agreed to my request that this
subject be a
matter of
strictest confidence between himself,
his wife and me (his wifo is: an American citizen whom. I have met
and on whom we also have a FOA)..
As I was leaving and thanking
hin for his cooperation, he expressed his appreciation in the
confidence that l'had in
him in a matter of this nature.
Towards the end of the conversation he asked if i
worked with
ät the Embassy.
I said
hin."
but I know
He answered,
"of course, you would be with counter-
SECRET
P-12330
P-11717
---
## Page 104
SECRET
intelligence and he is in political norh." " agreed wich
He did not appear to
this.
Other than
his telling me that I nort in counter-intelligence,
he did not ask any questions
about my position in the Embassy.
Subject made a very good impression; direct, businessilke
and no nonsense.
He said that he would call me in tow or
three
weeks
to advise the results of his investigation.
Paul Dillon
SECRET
---
## Page 105
14-00000
Pili mat
(2
See be?
Date:
To:
From N
I Ferris
Legal Attacho
Subject:
SOVIET SHIPS VISITING MEXICAN PORTS
1105-5156
(3/7/66)
Reference is made to your memorandum entitled
"Travel of Soviets," dated February 3, 1966; your number 10097.
Enclosed herewith .for reference are copies of the
crew list of the Soviet
"Vnushttelnyi."
À source, who has furnished reliable information in
the past, advised that the above ship arrived in the harbor
at Mazatian, Sinalon, on February 4,
snt1l 3:30 PM; on February 5, 1966.
1966, and remained there
According to.this source,.
Third Secretary. cf
the
arriving. by air from Moxico Clty and was staying at the Hotel
Freenan in Mazatian.
According to this source,
national
Intelligence operatives in Mazatlan. regorted. LOGINOV had no:
contacts while in the city except with the ship's crew:
attempt was made: by the
No
soviets. to
Introduce propaganda material
from
the ship.
Enclosures (2)
C(/ 1712
INDEX
This document l: fee the une of your
agency color nad ni.
contents chould te further di grated
withcut appropriate currimation.
SECRET
Group I
EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC
DOWNGRADING AND
- DECLASSIFICATION
Jeer
ARDED
200 -1-79
P-11717
---
## Page 106
14-00000
SECRET
On February 21, 1966, PEDRO ZARATE MARNOLESO,
Commandant. of
the Customs Guard, Maritime customs Office,
Nazatlan, Sinalos, advised that Mis men have been carefully
watching
the elements of the Soviet whaling fleet that are
currently visiting Mazatian:. Thes have beon alerted to the
importation of any propaganda or contraband,
but; as yet,
nothing has transpired.
When the flagship of the Sovlet whallng
"fleet arrived recently, there was no ong aboard who spoke:
Spanish or English, and the Captain seemed/to be. completely
lacking in Instructions: about documents. In order to enter the
harbor.
He did not have the necessary papors prepared. A
Soviet Eibassy official was sent from Mexico City in order to
straighten matters out.
ZARATE sald that the
purpose of the visit of 'the
whaling ships was
to take on fresh water nnd supples.
The
crows wero also given likerty.
Also, enclosed herewith for reference are copies of
the
crew list of the Soviet vessel "'Iskatel" which visited
Mazatlan on January 9, 1966.
In connection with the visit of the "Iskatel," it
is noted that a Soviet Embassy
believed to contain Soviet
Commercial Consul GEORGIY STEPHLYQVICH VISKO and. USSR 'Embassy
chauffeur VASILIY STEPHANOVICH NIKOSHNIKOV, was
observed 'on
the highway leading
to Unzatani on January Il,
1966,
and was
subsequently observed on January
1966, in
Mazatlan.
This office is attempting to obtain the crew list
of the Soviet whaling vessels
thhit
havo visited Mazatlan during,
February, 1966, and will make then
avallable when obtained.
1 cc.- Naval Attache
(Enclosure
6518
S 5 CR ST
Hamit Pul
P-8017
CARDES -
---
## Page 107
scou
611.2
5==1
15-5
Meeta otisco
?.
In macion aclor noticacation 19 2922525
nee acintiono aco tacobad indebnakor and dog dicorn and darlier cor
and toriad immanted I lunchess meet
202
25 20b- 1400 at the do Cordo Toctatart
Sing
canted
tant lie callod in do. thr Station on
a3 no madon the lindaçone. Boo the Coo. seen morrised co this call, tie Station
Tobably soild have reccirce sho advanco notice to kaloonizov ard his Soviot
flient companiors!
2o. 10-a0r come to Subj's cisico on 23 peS and tocother they went to tho
1a jorda leotaurorte
octand to gord the report on dog'e condition fion tha Fempio Olinio to
¡cocoa. Subg asica joinor ming ne manted the roport, and locinov anarerod
"ne want to tale core of your scald." /Corents subt will not cornlil.
acros startled subj by ashtre what he knor about tho super cecret Jovis
orconination "Place" lioments Bisd osplaired to tho Colo that "Pluga" was Corned
all ovor latir inorica after tus arrest of Tichrona had causod lari-like anti-
Scritle orcarizations to seriro into being in the latri countrica. Jous forreà
"Plica" (which 1a a tourer nod recning sone kird or military init) In orde=
to recsivo militami truininco Suoj Mono about tio or aninction throuh. tis
contrato in the Iorteli Inbaasy in Lexico althouch ie in rot a romber, lio
mures tie occan continent at about 25 to 50... The Ioroel1. Gout cent an
opporter end-ins'motor to lexico. "embers lave cone from lexico to Issac?
¿oo danirine (Suj Jarous, Éncarce So candled their travel arcingerenta):/
locance stated that he would lee to cón Sacut the Fonders of "plure", decauso
"it worla de intercotino in vale croanization could work fos them (the Soviets)":
Iranov sas pleascü iie: Suodle menare that the orconization nas rilitantly anti-
Jung indic.tod nithout too muci
enthusiaon that he rould do ghat he could.
iccinor mut srotior recuect to Jubg In a ruthor decultory sarnor, achine
-Suaj's cooreration si Subj "rants to, can
0r 1111" comply. Losino: torarked:
OSPIES MADE
P-11712
---
## Page 108
Premio and monted süi do dind. cut die cosction Oi
tieso citicials
e tag annal dron tai
aad o) e third reint thot Subg eculd not recallo
¡cirno teãd Duel that dio Sovieto vero arsioio lo recrist screono in te
Te dono mecursicù iniranation abeat tuo caplorees tho rodised for Suhg.
i.m.
Suo teo cenglissed tue né queation, autho did not iss iccimor
no le unand the inconnationo /commanti dubj expressoù in tho CLO, Plo ferr
cora the erodeto might trio do socrudt seracco in dio otitea, ona sor inat reasosa
w.:! it lont.cor die C.0. to lini: his personali colls to the orrice.
Thie
"ou ancet on tuo need dor ecution es lanerel paincinled, but thieunt it
int 1o:1nor moula so blatutly adontice his intentione of sibverting
ennati tito i "soro point" in sabg's colutiono nith lorinov and tá esciolted co. M
in drastating sactor cor the suturofo Locinov did not white donn the minos cộ
the crolorcesa
Inanov secigit un tie anorers lo Eriklocko's questions.
subg soid "les
mozon't rondje Hounov, estod di subf cruld nave thon by nost tiro.
omonts For all the alora reggesta sie 6o0, instrugted subt to do nothing,
exploinine that me nere elitlar desirave cons arder aselaiton on tro crurdo
le. onoration.
subd do "regared cog the oventunlity that no bay-wich to
ein tie milation to tho
Sorets/
: 3a.
i tiss rete his first job abroad. Locirov
carlind thot he ledooed an laida irarica seta counlo of leues, ani censioned
hen Subj senaried that the
dorseta dint hase oricial comisentition in trose contries, lorinov primeree
cisat da sod deon in commercinl riasians and ether missionse. Suig stated it ag
aia incrossion, Leenroe Loiner mentiored daviag boen in the junmles erd in
thot isinst in coon on arediar rissiors of sabotare.
leie intolle
dal siano in
---
## Page 109
antono abiod cubo dom he cinca do corinóia Subd soid ho mantou coro tico
to caraulado não improsudono, but roord that botaor 10 not "condo", spcais
Inino miê ligee the soft ageroach,
to sud mored do lá: nem conduzanio cracteent ca 26 debruaryo Dio seleciona
mo aduress, 'aireace rogericù to te Station, 1s dv. Guibres do
inico ao narco do rocisca lo ve Ate elicring he mas silcientl" loontifica
ai caline for Zeroe
o C.O, recomerda ias tie lattor be accented so dosimete
thie instaice"
Mia lore
14260
.?.
1-9 40402
---
## Page 110
micried plainte
Flintie
' 2740 29 Potator: 1965
C:
15
we 1220,
bartolor titlested,
ed coheverine to subj an eud candra do 25 20u a cace of mino
Goro apacino Sibdo at die darier's curiostirng to
inter-s
Sanbeans
"siteuront,
-Cusesy at 0900.
3..
Subj. reposted on
Zob
tro sacry co his hadhore arct wash Sasha on 16 Peu.
:.=
£o2d Saclas, for
he. fcund. standins to the side of the resthurant in Saaborns,
that hono piey end haa got up cut of snick bed sucinat iis rite's inotinetions?
dait to
that
'te.
masn't trying to avoid a rooting but, he was too sick
ậy
"Sashe
subj outside and calked ith hin
soard suits honce
then tola subs to sunrit tó lue the findings on she comple clinto on Subala
¿ninoos, cha he mould cornera then to legeon (for medienl rovice). /Comment:
Suld don, no Intention de doine 9o/.
•Suly too Sasha that he and aro on to Jaenoo Salludounky nbout Saials
micatine or bas, muclour polder, and that dabludovoky had jubt loured at hai
roo mustna such peive, diale queásires, cabardorally lad nodd that eerivone
is of Visa tasercut an can des Mie cprent of molçar power. Sanho Touched,
ud tidy that was only sonoreder tilk.
se correaced concorn to Sasta as to why he had been turnod. over to Valentin
Lorror
Sasha rezcated
so provious statement that losinor had more orrortindty
For outjido contre,
oven visits. to Subj's ordice as fort of hig naturel consular
dutiea.
Artier,
the chancover had been entered by their auporiore.
Sashs uaid
rat Lo:
non would cot in touch with subj.:
3.
The C.0.
fruna
out
that wien Subj had contioned. Schcrarria to Sasha
at on
corior bet ns beinge secker for the presideroy of lesico, Snoha had snown
Scat interest
The C.0
Just 1s there mere any aos vity on travel to the Sovict Union
(for, the mirnode of diccoverin: in Suby would bring-un the none or laria de. 1a
Pne Gerontos, a Salena siplice émlogee interested in travel to the Soviet unton).
sity coplied that done renters of the Jerdal commity in lexico were inquiring
scat a trip to cho Sovict Union.
Subado to. cula in whenever he hears to Loanor ahout a reet.
1040:
But 3,
in line dovin
trail
206 66302.5550
irite
•ard
andresue craduai accumulatic.
dn° o& his
r.CH
{o=
1
case of
Ped
case
=r,
¿cates'ts
that
i? it
rossinle.
this
lot over
tr.e
rext tro menths.
P-11712
---
## Page 111
1d-0d0
13-4-73
12-9
Jung mas ne fare Joche a hant tireo"
anpicnie coutze-tied.engteruation jabgadrired Die 5.0.
cmd called his
office ong dab, cated ip te sere reing to je tinsted
incistod
76 960%
102d Sanj to Co shasd rita
1a du Bel Sung' conontcé do the Goc, the results er ido neet des saulia ca
a Dochoo. Suo lattoritold Suad tuat sinoa de has litte wort that tafeg his
cande de die Sove:b, de la turnina July eier de lulontin who will serasdorth
sunde who had not vagentinorice defore at the Sevenb, andrey
renalcd das tut 003:011 richt with bir, talentin vao a nico rem mich border
Signa, tonover, carred die dali for most of the bolenen or Co
deto
Cogna ccariaánod because Subj end nos gut. baciait the ahomera to hin ques docao
Suis corlaco su nahann into Sauha in dum pith compleinta of thy he hedite acna
sno materda nis diclmesa, nis vicit to Bannio, Sorah olinio, tho findinici ca she:
•sans Colloned this reen the curden ce ais corplatats alout teé Sittets, raieà
Hab that sale do vãs málliná to do semicos tos the Sovioto, hâ vos cod rotima
"e "font essieents thes moré hondiro er do ciants to do mhat 1ộ conerate ea
Isröchente Sesha started to scothe
him in the sone old:
way about hor inier
cigt
Mo litsle wings mora, cice, out Subj cut his oft.
it about this tire, vole-tia
calvad in by sorino tat ke nea Sasno dust rass alons to Subj the secks
receive soon sicher up, and chat it is to to subj to toli then 12 he riii on sili
ndt coco-puish them.
Subá asrced to that trabesaled
Saahn then stantiod Jugg by asians carectly why it.mas that subd nas andr
con tre Soriot ünion.
Susg ansmered cardidly that he dian!t really loi riy-
ard;sadà the joviets znen na más not Adori ically with thom:
Sasbe seized or
tino to say that mas juat the may the Soviets mantea it Subd mas right rot-eo.
COPIES NADE
D- 11712
---
## Page 112
Ros: associatien
attest food ca tid date tood tied cased s-305-52
= 1.
tina
t9. xr0r0r3
his irisd,
more scr
to said
totete ere caredo tin mid in the thrife, and ho
Totes.
lando coale wide crater!
o reit territo
Time bug to checie sta
she corone
an, tait to that to bad. is:
of r.ales.
mende do decodes, de mooger cord de dougreat on to mas
Incidate ar conidate
we sent presides da trieded me the laters
Sing ela gadha dud calorian ete curbo he had starado cassed du to tro Stationd.
ent dekarrin, do cobor-chon, ens trying so card to fire Jend in tie. Jewish
Jaso, actlie rent root tor 15 Teo 0000 andr at Canborne Cestaurant en
amanço, coe cala chas valenain cula pot la dacre coeuge he nos roing to:
3a told uto co, that done tire aro chen dart sened to not liban cigars
so surgidio told Subj What Soviet écuriero no Agater transit Coxico to Havara,
at that they do dicet crom foscor..
subd aloo ronilence that Palet fatercy lad bockdà rascale at Suban osfice
last accli son a trinito i acotlan and danennillo.
§i to cod, at first obaros the soot mita Sasha set cos 15 Feb, end instricted
Subj not to bring the answers.
further, he nas to thros the Sacludess sit
mi5: saci at Secan as being too ridiculous to mi to a tumino nemoropezzar
mat mes coron nonlodie about Us, colion on malacrisatim on, in salerants.
abacco, Subj nas to curious concean to septia sbeut casts diren a contact tho
mcaby dantt inon mat the score mes on everythin that had sona before in
Subj's sort; saco Lastly, subg coula contion to Bagha tuat de sas reading the
Ted Inhos
Liter cacetiro idt encis Coyse,
ê, 2. Mea deciaca to contiruo on the took os
aimogiss Sasha and therefore have Subj nico his next sediat.
Sidd pas later
oprised o tie change in plans, and mill not shon ip es 15 Baù or l6 Febo
6. Subj adrised the C.0, on 15 Des that Susha had cilies to fire
id misscà dis rect, end gia tie soremo on for 16 363.
no sies on 16 Fare
---
## Page 113
k Junc.
Subject visited
the Embassy. twice
this. day. but
mothing of Interest
occured..
LOGINOV
came in and
call' and tolkica
made
a chone
to someone
about volleyball.
LOGINOV
spoke in
Sanniah and
told
the
other party
that he would be
over to "the house""
in half an hour.
Subject saw him
drive away in his
car.
P- 11, 712
---
## Page 114
14-00000
23 Juite 1966
35-71-30 Is lisievito Yolanda AL.FÁRO Vda de CACERES Butrago :
Chiapas 130- A
No Station traces of above name or on Gloria ALFARO.
ch
Request visa trace:
Yolanda ALFARO Vda de CACERES Butrigo:
(lives at Chiapas 130-A)
If possible, also Gloria ALFARO at same address,
C
NO RECERD
23 func. 666
---
## Page 115
CAZDED
sio?
6680
Entradá - 1319 ArS.- NE pOS LOQUINOV. RARSITI dios que
espere ua momento. Después it Culota ALPARO reguerda a LoQUIxoV
que olla lo conootó en la nocho de la Nevidad pasada en caso de
¡a Bollora SOTO, LOGUIROV la soguerda, apenas de que la paçado
tlORpo, AFiRO lo querro Irvitar a ua reunión ol sabado próximo.
LOQUINOV no podrá apeptar perque es dia que olloa argumlsan ••
una volada dentro do la andajada entro los seapañaros.
ALFARO que es me lastir, LOCUINOY proguate ou nostro comploto.
LIENGOY
Te que na Roura sino y que ala guture platicas al menos.
maiona por la mañana y poder saludarlo, LOGUINOV dioe que podrd
1 30)
ser el viernue porque riañona tione por la salinna sus elases de
Seciony
Medicate
ingios asi que podriaor el viernos on algin lugar de la ciudad
¿para toser un card y ea tado onu la mada lucer por colétodo
*para proglear mas tardo. GLORIi que ca el 35-71-30 que es de
"¿¿ su casus LOQUINOV 1o lamardentonces doannes para Fijar una
¿ Galcita. GLORTA que ella trabaja doco horas al ala pero onal nunoa
Pi
ostl on su casas aal que nofor lo llamara dañana aiseo. LoGUiNoy
que osti bion y que si ontonços quiuna misur ol puede sechusar
su alado de inglos y virlo, GLORIA que no da incesarlo o
SE TERMINA EL ROLLO. 808
o se tri nineroe enter
igle tie
Yaron da. 115,15 60 55
22 JUN
1966
Chiapo 13: A
pr.01ed.e
---
## Page 116
SECRET
CONTACT REPORT
SUBJECT:
-DATÉ OF METING:
AECELATIN, Jr.
• 16 Juno 1966
I hed lunch with Subject at the Reforma Club from
1330 80 1500 on 16 June 1966.
BOYAROY as bet Intonate had dont fled she passport photo of
"Viktor" he
lle said that our picture of LOGINOV was
not
'Vasilio"
whom he described as younger and not as heavy as FOcINOV's
picturo.
4..
subject roportod that on 13 June ISAYEV called him at
home and asked to come by: that
ovening.
ISAYEV arrived about 1930 and stayed to about 2030:
(Confirmed by LIENVOY):
Subject'
suggested that they have a Martini.
never had one and was
ISAYEV said that he had
interested in the ingredients and how it
was put together..
after he had drunk half,
Subject
noted that he obviously did not like 1t., Therefore, Subject
offored hin a Cuba Libra which he accopted and drank
of this combination was the first time
The result
Subject has soen ISAYEV
a bit tipsy.
ISAYEV said
a successful weekend fishing 3-5 June:
that he had heard that Subject had had
Subject admitted this
and then sounded off about how rude YATSKOV had been (drinking
Vodka in front of Nick and his friend, refusing to come to Nick's
for a drink or inviting Nick and his friend in, anger at Nick's
success, .ete)
mentioned that he had met the new
ISAYEY merely shrugged this off.
Nick. then
had spoken a few words of ingtten with kiktond thougan he was
very nice. ISAYEV answered that although "Viktor" was not a
flsherman, he had enjoyda seeing the Mexican countryside
particularly the scenery at Pucuato. They did not discuss the
third Soviet,
"Vasilio.'
FILE:
P-3776
P.- 8588
P-11712
SECRET
0903 728181 418
declassicnican
---
## Page 117
SECRET
6.
ISAYEV asked what his fishing plans wore.
Nick said
that he was so busy with his many probloms at the now plant that
he would not be going fishing during June.
Nick then suggested
that they so on the weekend of 1 July.:
ISAYEV answered "Not even Anatolly (XARABACH?"
okay and he could come. This
date is tentative and will be confirmed.
ISAYEV remarked that his wife and child were in
Cuernavaca and that KARABACH's wife would go down on the weekend
of 18 June leaving them both bachelors.
renarked that he would have to organize some wome: for them.
Nick asked ISAYEV about the Soviet volleyball team.
ISAYEV sald that he had been heavily engaged in working with them.
the team for oach game, then went out with then to
took them to the hotel, etc. and didn't got home nights
until 1ram.
Nick brought up the point that ISAYEV had never invited
him to
his house.
ISAYEV, definitely uncomfortable and searching
for words,
said
that he hadn'e invited them because his wife
thought: that there was too big a Contrast between Nick's home
and theirs." That Nick was "rich" with lots of beautiful things
that thoy lived very modostly having inherited undistinguished
curniture from has predecessor, etc. Nick pooh-poohed this
stating that friendship is what counts and the circumstances
of one's home meant nothing. ISAYEV ended by saying rather
famely. that he would invite Nick to his home.
Nick said that
from ISAYEV's words and discomfiture, it was
obvious that he:
is ashamed to invite anyone to his house.
Fanally, Nick said that it was his impression that
ISAYEV had absolutely no immediate plans to return to the USSR
and Nick feels that he will be here until November or
December.
Paul Dillon
SECRET
---
## Page 118
1d-0d0
SECRET
CONTACT REPORT
• SUBJECT:
DATE OF MEETING:
7. June 1966
I met Nick
at his apartment from 2030 to 2200 in
order to debriet him on the fishing weekend of 3-5 June.
Nick reported that when he and his Mexican friend
arrlved at Pucuato at 1845 on Friday" fishing
YATSKOV and
two -öther Soviots
were already there
3. June in frone of the
cabins.
They had come in ISAYUV's Vl:
Shortly thereafter
the Soviets came to the cabins. and Nick greoted YATSKOV and
introduced his Mexican friend to him.
YATSKOV did not introduce
the other two Soviets by name but they all did shake hands.
Nick invited them all Into his roon but only YATSKOV came.
He accepted a drink and loft with it
Later outside Nick
asked one of the new sovlots his name and got the answo Nick
"Vasilio."
asked. if ho spoke English.
The other one then used an English. word
This. Soviet sold his namo was
Viktor and that he spoke a little English. Nick then asked
YATSKOV which of tho other two was the newly arrived Soviet.
YATSKOV sald that it was viktor..
Nick then lent them his.
oxtra lantern and
that ended things for the night.
3.
The noxt day both groups fished soparately at
Sabanita, About noon YATSKOV cane by and noticed that Nick
was having luck so he brought the other tro Sovsto a spot
immediately adjacent.
They stayed about an hour,
have any luck' and loft.
They met again that evening at the
• Cabins- ATSKOV was uoset,
v1c. and his: triend had caupht 28 trout and the Soviet:
none.
Jealous and even angry.
Nick then
Invited Viktor In for a drink. Viktor did the same as YATSKOV,:
took the drink with him.
early Sunday morning for fishing.
owner that the Sovlots had left fairly early Sunday morning.
FILE: P-3776
P-8588
P- 885
P-1,712
Exclared to tui9a8...
downgratis, and
declassilicalien
SEC:
---
## Page 119
1d-0d0d
SECRET
Although all the Soviets were ploasant and correct
there was absolutely no socializing or extended conversation.
They did not accept Nick's invitations to come in for a
drink, except for the above noted occasions when they accepted
a drink and lofe taking le wich them.
"Viktor:"
Nick described him. as an older man,
to 42,
mediun height,
• 82-85 Nilos, heavy but not fat build,
roundish,
boyish
face, looked like an American in general
appearance.
Does not
English..
speak Spanish. Said he spoke a little
However, their conversation was so limited that Nick
couldn't determine his fluoncy.
He obviously understood
•everything that Nick said but his angwors and comments were
short and simple.
As noted above, YATSKOV said that he is
the newly arrived Soviet..
He did not do any fishing himself
but simply watched YATSKOV and the othor Soviet.
•6.
showed Nick a picture of BOYAROV.
Nick couldn't
positleoly identify it.. Our picture hus sunglasses.
During.
the day Viktor. had on a white covel protecting his neck and
& wide hat but no sunglasses. At night Nick sar very little
of him and it was dark.
However, Nick did say that our photo
was not at all incompatible with Viktor.
Also showed him a
photo d GAzIYEV and he said that this was definitely not
(COMMENT: Since GAZIYEV and. BOYAROV arc the only
new Soviets in town, and Viktor spoke English, he has to be
BOYAROV.
name Viktor when his name
is Vitally?'
7.
"Vasillo". About 28-32 years old, medium to dark
blond curly hair, nediun height,
very good athletic build,
tough and strong appearance, the all-American boy type.
Speaks pretty good Spanish but not as well as ISAYEV of YATSOV.
There are only two Vasillys at the Embassy, BUTSEV and
nrosmo but neither cones any where near the above
description.
(COMMENT: Nick's description of'yssilio"
fits
LOGINOV Ito a
. "T. "
However, his name is Valentin and not
Sas1l1y6
I will show Nick piccures at the next neeting.):
Previously Nick has net 8 Soviets;
all in true name
(mostly by first name only).
Thus it is strange: that BOYAROV
and LOGINOV should use phony names.
1o feve
Paul Dillon
wor
OGINC
---
## Page 120
7 June 1966
SUBJECT: RequIrement for LIREALM
& is requested that the attached Information on Sovlete Valentin
Sergeyevich LOCINOV and Yevgenty NikolayerIch CORTISYN be
given to LIREALM, Both of the Sovlets are known to freguent the
French Club, I la requested that LIREALM report on any activitles
of the Soviets' at the Club, or any other Club members with whom
they assoctate.
N.C
P-11185
P-11712
P-11163
---
## Page 121
Valentin S. LOGUINOV
-Third Secretary at the Sovlet Embassy
Born in 1927.
Wife Alexandra, born in 1928
Son Dmitry, born in 1959
petro
LOGUINOV is tall and has very curly, light brown hair.
He speaks
fluent Spanish and some English,
He drives a green 1905 Impala with:
diplomatic tags 19-DA.
---
## Page 122
Content Agent 5f 30m 66
In
the contact regest 0? 12 Annil, Sulect trport a
that LOCINOv
dad visited hie-acons
Girons the
April
and
madg
Long.
distance
prone cail
00 Croonavacs.
At our mecting
on
June he produces
the chons bili
mics the phone number
According
to the satly
She car!
which agrees with
race to phone number 2-30-65
The runder given
to
us my Suprect
10-÷721%
like E.
checked this number and found it listed to
Moses gameso de la Fuente
Callejon E.
Prediado Humero 4;
Cuernavaca, Y0
have do traces of inla
him since
Peopie. 62gea
LouTOV talked fong and
concono else's nano:
minutes on 6acrile
P-11, 712
---
## Page 123
14-0000
132
SECRET
31 May 1966
MEMORANDÚM FOR A
•FROM --
SUBJECT:
Mr. Nothan L. FerrIs.:
Legal Attache:
Winston N, Scott
Travel of soviets
This office has recelved a report that
Sovlet VIce-Consul ValentIn Sergeyevich LOGINOV
travelled to Mexican port co. 27. May 1966. He
expected to be back In Mexico City ca: 1. June 1966.
Ho ls belleved to have gone to Veracruz:
travel would be appreciated.
Any Information avallable to you on LoGiNov's
IN MEXICO CITY®
# 10525
Distributions
Original - Addressee.
= 50-2-41A
P-11212
Memo Chron
Excited a fileral.
- SECRET
---
## Page 124
ps: 11712.
SUBJECTS.
Contoot Baport/LIC03T-5
PCP- 2112
12 day 1966
1l we 1200e Subje office.
By colopheno an attoapt uno nade to line subj up sor an LeFLorTeR. but the
tico subj yes ablo to allot for moeting the representative fron Washington"
was too lilted for the operator, and this the axicination was postponed to
bows later date
Tho G.00
anta to go on recore,
any event, for belleving that the Mining
van
not epicomtato for dubjeoting subg to the leariar. Subj had been led over
period of centhe
up
to tho polat it
he carried out a break off tron the
Soylose so olandesting work for those fust the nemo doy be hedi been soneduled
for the examination, 3 Mar, ho had a econo with hin old Sortet one offloor,
prishodko, and do nattor what aplond Subj han (aad ho has plonty) subj linda
the break-off soones ouotionally wouring, Henoo, to have apring an ICPLUTER
on kla at this thno, ho may havo boon inordinataly sonsitive to a fooling that
wa pletratod hiss contre an at did aftor our adamant stend that he out 1009e
fron the Sorote the Fisk of almonting suoy l en lonsumen was not, in the
Cio. 'a opinion, vorth 1o at tile partloular stare of relationahipe in the
operations
20 On 12 Xay Subj reported that on 30 Key at about 1630 Valentin Loginov
cano to hia offlie.
locinor asked subj if he knew anything about the Congress
of Intollectuals that won soine to take place fa Mexico. Loginor sald that
the Consrosa, whose topto was Anti-senitian in tha Soviet Union, was really
anse-Soviet, no brought subf a panphlot in Sperlan "ho Jens In the Soviet
Vatop" (petnted by (he Soviet inbaray hMoxico) - (attached), Subj did sone
Loat thinking, boomund he in reality had booked the hotel roservations for
the croup that was to attend the co
Ho told lostnow that he had handled
tho hotel reservations att the llo el Dol Prado. When Loginov aaked for the
races of the delegatoa, Subj daja he didn't snor them
Darler thet day Suby hag woon tersels lab inad, and the Congrees had been:
a toplo or discussion botwein. then.:
head had said that some new media, apealfloally
El Dia: Politioa, and Stone, had oriticised the Congress as bedhe inti-Soviet.
Tho toraeli Sabaroy notually as supporting the Consoss; but for polly recaone,
hạd tó mạin lạ the background. An Ioraol1, named Tov, was in Mexico promoting
the Constuss, but ho
was not associated with the Israell Embasay, Arad feared
scheduled to take plaoe at
pirhago biat MAGIDIN
- 11/2
---
## Page 125
to Hotel Pol Modo on 35, 3è and as e, and so nad not @bernals for plante
Socros Service protoction. Arad told Subf that elcit poraons had ooo. to_
Hedloo, brought be tha criety,
Ho didn't know where they cane: from or wha
thay were. diad was harm that sone nevapopore were defonding the Congross.
istor Losinare rialt Suby called 'Arad to advico hia of the Soviet's
Interest in the Constead.
Subj said that Arad would be dining at hid hone
that ovoning (11 day).
3. togtnor also told Subj that ho had beon la Veraorus beane of the goater
thet had jumped ship theres to bald that ho had found the meanion, and returned
Nia to bio anspo Taore had been a fisht aboard only, the desmon no hod had
Not had hit & companton with a bottle and thousat he had killed limo The
can had họt beon killed.
4o. Sub! anid ho would do solas to lew York for five dare on 15 Mav. He stay
at the St. Rogle Hotel,
COPIES NADE
---
## Page 126
SECRET
CONTACT REPORT
DATE OF MESTING
2 May 1966
SUBJECT.
L. On 2 May 1966 Subject called me and asked for a meeting whleh
cook place at his office from 1530 to 1600 the same day.
Subject reported that on Saturday, 16 Apru he saw LOCINOV wun
hia wife and con leavins the French Club at ca 1500% He noticed that another.
Car, 25 DA (GORLITSYN a) was parked next to LOGIOV's. A halt an hour
later 25 DA was stul there, which meant that is owner bad something to do
with the Club Independent of LOGiNOV. I showed Subject pictures of GORLETSYN
which he immedlately. Identified as the Sovler who was with LOCINOV the firet
ilme Subject saw him at the Club, (comment: Since this makes two times that
GORLITSYN has been at the Club, perhapa he is'also a member.)
Subject reported that on Sunday, 24 April he and another member,
Antonlo SARMIENTO, were looking for a fourth co play doubles: Subjeci
noticed LOCINOV standing beside the tennts court and asted SARMIENTO to
lovie LOGINOV to Join them. Howeyer, LOGINOV deciled and sald that he
was going to have a swim with SARMIENTO a wife. After lunch Subject sav
LOGINOV and SARMIENTO playing chess together and overheard that the
are on a first-name basls. From the above Subject commented that LOCINOV
and the SARMIENTOs have a close social relatlonship.
40
Subject Inowa SARMIENTO casually as an occasional tennis
companion, SARMIENTO owns a plaatle factory which makes airine baga
and simllar kems. He le about 35. His wife's name ls Violeta and she la
In her late 208, Subject looked them up In the phone book and got the following
Lating Violeta SARMIENTO, Manuel M. Ponce 143, Guadalupe In, tel: 24-21-58.
5. We have several LIFEAT traces on the SARMIENTOs lu social contact
wIth NECHIPORENKO at the French Club. Evldently LOGINOV took them over
from him;
Now that Sublect has found a link,
I told him to try to engage.
LOCINOV In conversarion, have a drink with blm. etc. In order to establleh
a direct line to:bim.
PILE:
1 - P-12230
1 - P-11163
1 - F-11712-
1 = P-12703
P. Dillon
---
## Page 127
1
p. 1: 0824
LICALLE
(Esporta da las
• Abstl do 1256
Laa aotiridados an al cuo durante al aja do Abril, fuiron noraaloa on
canoral, sin gabarco obares que con mucha fricuanota asturiaron locando al
club crusos do 4i, 5:0 ú loabros Jornos con tino do estullantoa, ostoo en 51
Rogloidor turioron à woos cortas ontrovlatea
con algunos do los iloabros dol
Groo que duranto esto ma dojo da var un mayor cantidad con rolacion a otros
mas, a varios sujotos dal cluu los qualos a continuaolos citos
9774
đẹjó de varlos ol Nonindo 3 volviuron o1 Lunos 11
":l16rcoloe 13
3229:
2102
820
2270
"PRIK E DIG
96647
" 16rcolos 13
: .89
Sábado
16
Lingo
3a0a1o
F16
16
Juaros
Luzos
•Viomia
:21
22
25. (PAIK)
29 (200)
16730
• GoRt
3396
12009
LUCRY TRI
2120
" bogingo.
17. -
"215rcoloa
20.-
i.
". Tertos
26
...i scondo
26:
30
no obcares ningun abadio on lao aotividados, no costento hay algunas
mujeras que las dojo de var on algunas coacionas hasta 2 aaaanaa, untra ostas
wal era,
toa joabras que raportó ol luna 25 entro los cuales erjo qua venía lIk, 10a
vi solamente 2 dia
iteo
COPIES MADE
P-11112
---
## Page 128
SECRET
27 April 1966
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Nr. Nachen L. Ferrts,
Legal Attache
Winston N. Scott
Travel of Sovlots
1.
This office has received a report that Soviet Vice
Consul Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV: planned to travel to .
Guadalajara on 25 April 1966 in order to attend the Congress
of Mexican Travel' Agencies (ANAV) there.
Also planning
to "
attend the Congress. are four visators: fron
the USSR:. Viktor
BOYCHENKO, Ley MIKHAYLOV, Lyudmila KUZNETSOVA and Asan
AKINEDOV:
Any information avallablo to your office on the
activities of the above Soviets in Guadalajara would be
appreciated:
THIS
INFORMATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE.
IT NUST NOT
BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE
WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN NEXICO CiTY.
• 10401
Distribution:
Original - Addressee
50-2-4/A
P-11712
Memo Chron
Extern sos sotasan.
SECRET
---
## Page 129
14-00000
Brigticis
Gyn ch
SUBJECT&
Cintact Refort:
25 AIr 1000; entrance.
• Salinico
25 Epril. 1966
arquinades, in cors
1. Subf reported that he ras at the nirport the nimht of 23 apr to recalve
the INTurIST delecation,
Kv remesentativer Ibariuion and forero mere
also on hond. Soicienko was much put out because their arrival. had boon:
doloyed over the natter of cotnining l'ericon visas. lo told Subj he rould
bo 111 l'exioo only for the first day of the NaY conferenco in Guadalajara,
becauso ho was
going on to loatread on 29 A% to Inagurate Soyiot ship
service direct between lontrcal and Leninetad. The others would remain in
Lexico for the conference
2.. The delegates were taken to the hotel lcloina. Suble wio brousht lov,
Lakhotlov to the defore, asked how it wan that ikhataw hed left the Soroton
oscico to be in ITunist. likhailor sald he had a 15 year old danchter, in loacon,
and wanted to renain there.
His card read "Director of International Orennications",
INSIST.
3. Subj had coffeo it the airport with otentia 1:
noriend Vialo. Nothing
as said of subj's brea off from lorinoy.
do Subt mill aratt overturos bron the Soviets. He seid he my not planninos
to be out of Mexico until 15 Kay.
PiO!
Paris
---
## Page 130
14-00009
SECRET
Mair color report of Soviets
LICALLA
25 April 1966
SUBJECT:
SOURCE: -
LOGINOV
-Wifò:
ZHEVTUN
MALAKHOVICH
Wife
MIROSHNIKOV
Wife
NITROPOLSKIY.
Wife
MUKHIN
Wife
NIKIFOROV
Wife
SHPAKEVICH
Wife
PRYGOV
Wife
PRIKHODKO
Wife
RADVANSKIY
Wi-fe
BEDRIN
Fife
STRIZHOV:
Wife
ROMANCHENKO
Wife
SILNIKOV
Wife
SOKOLOV
Wife
BTOWTI
Brown
Dyed brown
Dark brown
Brown
Brown with gray
brown
Slack
Brown
Blond
Platinum:
Brokn
Bark brown
Dark brown
Dark brown
Brown
Black
Brohn & very gray
Dyed dark brown:
Blond & very thin
Dark brown
Dark brown
Blond
Brown
Dari brown
Blond
Platinum
Brown
Platinum
Brown with gray
Platinum
SECRET
P-11712
p-8954
P-9772
P- 6518
P-$7:70
P - 7220
P-9026
p:S167
P- 10011
P-2270
P-9289
P-9037
P.- 1:1579
P-8609
P-6414
P-$10
---
## Page 131
14-00000
KIENDOY
con
Paulie!
Whito.
Cc- LOGINi
20 ATril 1966
Swish
v.
P-1/12
alice
Thong
tne Cano errived at Suij's aérico, one do the calo coploreca. of Subj
cridently idiod hin that 's. ferar" gas here.
üing came ires his innor
•office to odviro tho Colo Unt (reonid inilerion) letitoros mos in his offico
maling travol arrangerents, file CoP, reuninco is als outer drileo, but citi hio
back to the ransacenos and hia coco turica in a rascale f - 1026
Subaquentage Subi told the co. tint acreate Irevir cor vention to
che Soviet intondon 22 bre via dup toreco
do mha duo so rotion to lexico on
24.205
Subj also mentioned that the Ita
uSt delecation coring to the hiv rooting:
in Guadalajora (27-30 Ar) hnd not arrived in cadco an acheduled (ma 19 Ag)
becauso there had boon a delay in their recolino lexicon viens. tho delay
ras occasioned by scsican demand for cinical bio ruphic Incoration in order
to procose tho vioad. ino rouy of for has bean roacheduled to arrive in.
lioxico on 23 Arr via sabena.
The CoDe saw the exchance of telo on to tla infumation required for visa:
Laguance, and notout the following
Vitorkatchenko, bon 21 July 1925 in ituninals menident of INVIST; Pessport
•D 01155 B, Laoued 6 Got 1965•
Ler? uhallov, born 11 l'ay 1921 in Loscon, chief of the Internatioral deartnent;
Sport C065257, Loquod 25 Sent 1965
soon Mhredoy (sic), born 24 June 1924 in Tashkert; chief of the Vacekintan. Courie
Direciernto Pageport 069757, Losucd 24 Deg 1265.
Indol Victoova, born 5 kar 1923 in Moscow; Latin Merican Departrent;
Passport C 065784, Jasued 6 Oct 1265.
Subj tentioned that at the Corenhagen Congrosa on Contress Granizations
that he atterded 30 war to 2 Apr 1966, he set to Soviet "scientists" nd
the INFURIST ron for Denmark:
The " representatives fron the scade of Sciences"
nere Connadiyi hadroyevich loshaey and Timr I. Timofciov
(cards attached).
20.
the CoO. who hod heard from
Subj on Da in be telenhone that he had are
his confrontation with Valenty
Jeanor last week requested a full account of
that nocting. Jubj reported
Loner had, called him on 15 dr roquestins
a scot someniore outside;
subj inslated that losinor come to his offica.
CAR DAD
P-2'112
CP-11112
---
## Page 132
td-innod
2.
me dollonano diso de adde io ciaoo ero to subd'e offleco de noked Subg hor
:is-trip (io auroro) lad teca and orocifically naties 1à Sigj ind acon Giretto
•Padeced derter. Subl sentied thas he had foini out that diargie and hor hunband
mere raca donino in Ital
Ici nou acker mhos ingaghino subs tre recojved sa furoro en aruncelo bucking
ou: co "T0, Dubj nnomerrà that he lud arolen te anno ibenchra, including
¿corso lainero of dir Franco, tha conajuered in cenoral that de Caullo vas not
monce bus that his uni mas teo drnatio, that he nas annoiri overyone, and that
ranco could not be icolatedo
men Subj nade his break ofs arnouncenent to lectrov, arring Dut- I'a sorry
to tolly you that Ita not solra so be abla to nors rith you ary nore.
Thero
aro several reasons." Loginov asked if arytrine had harponed. Subd roplied he
had scasona. Indinov askod uhat they vere. Subg cald ho mas tired, he had a
lot to dos and frankly ho mas plain disaprointeda tioro had beon bio doala
nlannod, nothing happenod, and he mas doine just jurik.
Intinov asked If that
mas slojn final deciaion. Suby said you. tuo Soviot then asted. if they could
talk dt over. subj gatd cortrandi ars tiro, herourn it mas nereed betecen
thoc that toy nould cot hale an hour before the espected arrival at l'ex1oo
nort of the unust reir cono to lexico. They would seet in the restaurent.
subd told Locinov lo had traveled with dio dacarov, ma that thoy had regone
very ilordly, ind he astod donov le he rinded that ho sar dic 1b amin.
loginov said not at'all- dut not to cali tho ino at tho sovia er use the phono
Cor ani calle to the sout
di stntod in para. 1 abovo, tie linurist delecation dia not arrive on 19
aru, and Subd who knew of the rostioneent did not so to the nirport, and
cosscquently niosca his ret nith Locirov.
30.
subd, In his cuatecary ray assed "did I do richt?" Me G.0e gaid 1t vos
Tino if loginoy cot tio no-nonsense ides that Subf mas throug
The C.ó. toid
Subj to mait until tho Sovs pet in touch nith hin again, and to havo their
second weet, at which subs acain maies pericotly clos that ho is throush
Ho
1s: to renain friendly thou h, and la iree to do ansthino he wishes re estabilähing
conscos vith the soriat asboisndor. Subs baid he soula under an circurstances.
rostpone his net with Lorinov urtis at locat the micht of 23 hor when the:
InutIst delogation is scheauled in arrive.
COPIES MADE
---
## Page 133
cut
SECRET
B5x100, DoP.
27 702ly, 1966
Ro: VALENTIN S. LOGITICU
Recy: 4x8r4 1566.
source: 4/8 (ula I4) (FOR PERSONAL ATTENTION COS)
(13:00 his)
Dates: 22 July, Inst.
CINDED
diese
Some time ago subject is radio was stolen from his homo.
He roported it to the police and nothing happened. He has continued
to roquest polica assistance in this mattor, until the robhory and
subjoot's complaining about laok of polloe attention was brought to
the attention of Gon, OpETo, who assigned, or requested that an agent
be assigned to gò out and calm down the trate soulot. The agent
want out on 19 July, last.
police hia is eart
Da 20 July, last, the agant reported bnot to son. odoro that
ho had talked to subjoot for some time about the stolen radlo, bùt that
collowing the discussion the subject had aaled the agant "to work for
him on cortein watters", offoring him 5, 000.00 peson per monthe Agont
requested instruationa, don. CETO contadted i/8, alsousand the ratter
and told the agent to accent the offer. Agènt again saw subleat on
21 July, laste and was glen his flost "assignment" by subjoot.
This was a request for agent to leonte one NICOLAS JUAN
BOSTROEIN
and latter's wife, VALENTINA. GRUSDOM DE BOSTROEN, both described es
Venequelan oltizens, and to advise subfoot soonest as to street address
and tol phona number of roadno, do well as placo of empLoymeng y
50-6-91/4
1-12733
SECRET.
1011712
---
## Page 134
SECREI
• 2.0
In mado a quick check of the Gobirnación siles on the BoStRoNa,
with following resulta:
CORAS JUAN BOSTON: 7128.93
Born St. Petersburg, Russian In 1915. Indiation that at one
tina ho sorved in laS. Navy, Presontly employed as "Diroctor of Projects"
by stophene-Adamson de Mox10o, SiA, de GiVo, Callo Norto 65 #1058,
Za?, 16; H6x1c0, DeFo; tol, 47-67-89, 47-42-22. He 18 I1stod as Vonezuolan
oltizen.
VALENTINA CRUSDOW DE BOSTROEN :
Born Breslau, Germany, worked as translator or teacher or
Russian at U.N. Presently emplojed as teacher of Russian at the
Iboro Amerloano Univoralty, Prosently a Vonezuelen nitizon.
The Gen. ligro of Stephens-Adamson de Mexioo La RICHARD SEYMOUR:
BARER, a U.S: oltisen.:
I/8 suggests that we may destre to oontsot BAkIR, to got a line
on the BOSTROENa, and, if that source and others available to un give
them a clear bill, that we may destro to contaot them and start à little
backfire, 18 -1l1 cooperate ally with us. He would like to know your
roaotion. (He l'a personally: Intrigued by the case, and will be anxious
to hoar trom you ula thesame route baake mer? tann
CARDED
---
## Page 135
TO
OPI TA TA 10 10
8010-108
DRA GRA
LITED STAITS GOVERNWENT
Memorandum
The Files
fa viennes
22 J0l5.1066
FROM:
Gile
SUBJECT:
V Natalio
1o At DEsh hours I had a telephone call from the Secretary
of Coterracion, Ilc, Juis Echevarria, He dais that he had an urrent
ratter in wiich ho needed oy helf.
He asiad that this was a natter
that President Cuctaro Diaz Orone vas personally mr interested.
co Echovarria sort Jiencoy/? to see ne and gave ne the follow
Ins incormation and asked the collere i lo or ma
à).
President Jia% Ordas is personally very lipset! by
certain recent actions by. sone Soriets in Mexico.
(Notes I:
celleve, lut de not know this,
that sore Sovirt ras triod to
"ancruit" a sosree close to the President and that this has.
"rackfired!")
Palatin TOCUINOr, Societ (Ecomi XJB) Is of partic-
ular and urgent
Intorect interest lanthe, Pincident.
I was.
tola he schevarria on the telophone that the too name on the
list he rould send by Lienvor/e would probably set the samé
treatment that sons.others set in 1959% This refers to PNO
actions taken in larch 1250 agalast tha, Sovints caught with
Dematrio VALIIJO fartiray ant the Railerad Strikers:
I-was ask,
ed if. cruld gerd tunthings. to Echecarria urgently:. These sies
1 Summary. of data, in INUIMOV, particularly raying what there
was to show him a "Spy"g and,
secorry, list of lor Spies in
Soviet inhassy, (Lote: These requests nete siven to mo oral-
li and .cn
a card
22 July 1966).
ky Montoy/2,. when fraw Mim at 02:40.hours on
e). Data on two Mirchloakers"s Fell ALTAME and, disce
Lenin AlAWAVE:: Those two, are "nor and 3 Elle resire will
card fre: Echevarria slich Lientoy/2 gave me.
E.?
asked Echevarria for his
peraoral assistance in cottiro
the data on Sovints wiic-itte
leitican Foreian Ciri:"
that
has.
I told hin
this data,
ith photocraghs particularly,
would halp us.
Fe ronised
to get this data for is: and T'intera de push for it on a contiming basis.
Diatribition
Buys Sarings Bonds Regularly or the Payroll Sarings Plan
111288818029
Cos Lienpo/& 1P - 5530÷
2ra-2 (P-E081)& ALFATS 15-2/20,
---
## Page 136
JILN.:
mentines with Subirat. en il ind
i.ed
Cree 16.70
idice Prancis J. COIGNE tofulect i
meeting, was
set for bednesday 27 only
cornir of ruebla and Jalain otrito
t..
is claimed that ho had.rcintivorin.town
:1s notes up to date.
He had very.?lt.te
o was Instructed
to make every cliort
1 nily basis.
•During the metino on
*is wint was leaving and that rahlo
•1: 19
in In the future.
sublect sald abaolurly
neer lalking about another tonic.
I war rot
ineratood me and repeated tint i war raving
rint he understood.
My impres:lor sas
is leavine ond his reaction to my bit of
n.:.
i mini
picted. (or enther his lack of ronceion)
¿ublect enters the car due berirs rolking.
1*11
tals a voly strance way to berin any kind of
monelen tint he might be reneatine a proared
ince
wire I asked him the same quertlor..in
1 he would aive me the answer in thr
afairly but he always. chanped it. enoup. sc
writred
that he was telling me something in ila on
Cischalett
It was a point that always bothy red me
a matter
of record.
(rom his
written notes)
sullect saw the short Amerienn womar lererlously
rhoningir subject's store to a
tourist. ornay)
alie too. 5orlet Erossy about 1130 hours.
lie did not ce
SHO
one into the shop to use Subicet's phine
rut the
inori
out of order.
About the game time
he saw terr who
to be Americans
enter the embassy.
one was white ind
neiro.
subject went to pick up some hotties and
to
rach other in English.
Accordin: to subject,
told
in l-m
trint two Arcricans had visited the imbass
brcaice they did not want to firht ir Vict Nam.
Dren
•able to identify
the woman but the Americans
are
The
Carier:.
iIcow. said they left the Embassy at 1157 hours.)
'made.
two vialts to the Embassy.
once in the
in -re early afternoon.:
thnt
ratkov told him that they wanted visas.
ow SILNIKOV knew anythirg
about thesp
SiNTrO: 1s no longer on the main gate of i.
inter in thr day i TINTKOV dronped by land made the comers
nicet that Viktor KAlyGIN
had heen
placed
on rar anin ratr
once. more (contIrmed by the basebonces)
ag that he (o1T.) wa::
"offically" the administrative
"firer.
He nir he
enn now find time to eat Mexican rood with i:
Od 114
he would be by the following day about 1000 hours.
" June.
SITNIKOV came Ir about. 090 hours and
TiT,
Tarmitoixed him sore scecial terlean
food
Ana's Day.
He was there for about a half
rucTsOV came in and ordered 75 pe:an
01
elvered that same day by 100 in:
ments and at poon bours iner.
•le..i three mide cases
of ch.t.
:.itIor. Is already there"
and askrd fubject
•ly to the
mbassy. On his arrival at
:
ni.i that there were
grours from all the
aid hint each had broucht wine and food
thir country.
There was
so nuch food and
---
## Page 137
14-00001
Cilici
464m
espore un norentõe
DoopuRa iT JOSE CUTE ALVAREA GAYOU enlada a
su amigo roouinov. tete progunta of se diversidy el descones
bleno JoSt LuIs dice que et y que ya de pues lo platicará y que
sOlo lo llams para avisarle que esta de rogroso y que tambien
es para avisarle que no hon tenido noticios de TUCHA o TYCHA
y por osu quiero platioar por al LoGUINOV Se interosa on seguir
Lao OlaN0O, LUGUINOV data de aeuerdo y nonan a lao once do 1a
tailana pard a violtarlo para platicar de 0su,- 35
permite trenes att
CARDED
15 60 55
JUL
p-11713
---
## Page 138
ATVA32,
(nichoocan)
core mila
570105/5(50 i6)
KETORCY
30
Nov.
61
ALVAREZ, JOSE LUIS
SEX: # CCA 7
650-C04-034
AMMA- 2751€
CIT- NEXIC
27 CCT €5
CCC ?
ẠOL
• MEXICC• МІС†САСАЛ
ON A LIST CF RAMES CE ACTIVE MORS CF THE NATL:
LIBERATICA: MCVEMENT -IN THE VARICLS
STATES-
MEXICAN
ALVAREZ, JOSE LUIS (I di Jess?)
SEX M DOB ?
050-009-005/1
HMM
06018
17 NOr 61
CIT MEXICO.
OCC ?
MICHOACAN
• MEXICTIONIE DAGERATION MOVEMENT COMMITTEE
NOV 6Y.
SUBJ IS MOR OF MLN COMMITTEE WITH
HEADQUARTERS: IN MORELIA.
1. * HMY.
FLO
INDEX ÖNLY
54:064=92/3
Litanial (detach)
20 dure
(intende Into Russian Language Classes) I
ALVAREZ, JOse Luis
Att to HAS 27516
27. Oct 65
50-4-34
Page 20
Active member. MIN, Michoncan
ALVAREZ, JOSE LUIS
SEX M DOS ?
050-009-004
HVMA-20910 402
01 NAR 63
P1
CIT MEXICO?
0c6?
SOVE CONTACT WITH CHECH ENSASSY.
MEXICO
•NOV-DEC E2. WORKS ON PERIODICO D
LA UNIVERSIDAD
AND VOZ DE LA UNIVERSIDAD.
UNAM? KUSSTA
1201-04.167/ PRAISED REPORTS
SUSU WROTE FOR THESE MIGAZINES AND SAID.
HE WOULD GIVE THEM MONEY AND MATERIAL TO
HELP SUPPORT THE MAGAZINE, NEXI.
CARDED
---
## Page 139
Paul &
1.. I have reviesed the entire LOGINOV flle and have made coples
of all pertinent WENvol alipa for the following P filos and bave
included a note to that effect in each of these filess
Mriam AVILA Ratu
P581
Socorro FLORFS
P-12259
Silvador PAZ Plata
Erika KAMMERMAN
-12775-
P=12843
2. Atlached hereto aro coples of all the clips I found on the
other people included on the liot you gave me.
Besửdes thá Lị Aprll olip on Dr. Juan Lula ALVAREZ Gallou
I found a 12 Jul 66 cali fron Jose Lula ALVAREZ Cayou, probably'at
Toast related 1f not-the sane person. - Thie le the only nam on whioh-
other
there are any/possibly identiflable traces:
(2) Aocording to a 28 June 1962 LITEA Contact Feporte
Jose Luis ALVAREZ, was one of the students in the Tuesday
and Thurscay, 7 to 8:30 p. la, Ruasian languasa classos at
the IICh during the montha of February and Marai.
(2) H8-6018, dated 17 Novonter 1961, basod on Information
-fron LEVOY Unit G, reported that one Jose Lula ALVAREZ vao
a memher of the MN Comitttee of Mlchoaon.
(3) La a 30 November 1962 Legal Attacke roport one
Jose Luis ALVI:SZ of Moralia, Michoacan, was named as one vao
assirted the lational Ilberation Movement in Maxico.
(4) "HIN-20810, datod"|" Marda 1963, Incluced the following
Intorration iron-LIBUFOKM: "Ono-Jose-Luis-AEVARS2-(matrogyndo
unknos) 1s putting-itema in tha 'Yon de la Pairersidad! (Univer-
sidad Autonara Nacional de Maxico) for the Gachs. KURATA,
the Chargo d'Aftaires ln the Grech Embassy praised ALVAREZ
for bis reports and sald 've will give you soney and mterial
to help support the magazine' ALVAREZ also works on the
Chiversity's "Feriodico de la Unlversidad" (resispaper),
-(5) 1121-27516, dated 27-Ootober 1965, provided sn 11
October 1965 l1stinz, agaln based on LIBIVY Ieformation, on
---
## Page 140
14-00000
which the naso of Joso Luid ALVAREZ was agAlo included as an
sotive member of the Mil and a member of the State Comrittoo
of Morolla, Michoacan, which had its general offices at Gulllerno
Prioto 35-10 1a Morolla.
b. About Gloria ALFARO, I wonder 18 she may not le related
teacher at the UNAl Econorica School and
- to Ofella NUFAO Lopes (P-11339) / friend of Antonio SARMIENTO (P12703)
and bis ulfo, VIolete Both Ofella ALPARO and LOCINOV attended a
Carlataaa party at the SAMENTO's last yoar (pertinant" alipa included
vith the Glorio ALFARO material attached). In the 22 June 66 conversation
Gloria ALFARO had with LOGINOV she mentions baving met bin at Chriotme
timo.
c, Copies of all of LoGINoVis contacte with thé Instituto
...do Interprotos y Traduotores, Inoluding the one which-mentioned
aro attached.
Senorita HARNANDEZ/ Othor poople conneoted with that outfit are:
Lio KELSIN
Sarita -Inu
Jacobo Chansinsk1
3o Besidea tho names on your list I also found two alipa an
Margarat (Magre) MADOR uho seema to be on quite familar terms with
- LOQINOV, I have included ooples of them also.
.. dodote that all of the calls In queation are Incolne calle
Also to each of these people something la mentioned about classes.
---
## Page 141
Dilas
Reportable?
Jonging.
Reports
C.
FOTOS 1022,.23 S
10
1.0 20:15
x200.
$1%
bujo
In
t2oa.0110
-cos
Coxoroses
332O•
Since at To
2Ckcd
Siu-
211.01
Lege ches in pest rite et
i tri repater agree?
o-800
190:20;
chico, do so ashit
• o
Saiday
д.1
16.
s:
13220050
3303
-703
1c.
139.
c]
0209,
y C
199
1 ho
1T..C
$33
"209s
ad C.
-.01
120 23
1:11712
gordit.
---
## Page 142
1d-0n0d
SECRET
AMRANURE MOR TUT FILES
28 Jino: 1000
1o I called Subject he his offter on 28 lunc.. He said that he hasn's
men or been able
do such latrly because he has been travelling almost
I trled to set hie talce during the last two merle
mu he was out of town hoth Hires).
to of three venes.
Howver suhjeet has seen lorIN witis wife or child st the club
He was never wies intelo Carrent.
He has not
reen. C0l4I15YN
3. I will call Subject deal in ali-July and seo him at tint time.
Paul Dilloi
FILE:
1-12703
P-l1712
P=11103
7. 912330**
SECRET
---
## Page 143
''..
20 Juro 1950
Contact Repot:/ 2ICC3Y-5
25 Jero 115041225, Subj's serico
1o In scopenso to a callain ly Subj, the 0.0, mont to d06
Suld so Satiries
Iraina 25 Juicol
2. Subj rupcated thet Valentin Louinor had drogneú in to tro ortico on 24 Juro
to alo arrangumenta for a return wip to the Soviet Union foz (icoloi) Lecrov,
who, lecircy soid, bad to be in lescer at the latest 4 Julye
Subg said tw
eculd try to handle, /Corments logiror
said he sould coso by the offsco on
27 Jino with Iconov's pocoport, because thore ves tro litzihoca thrt Subj
woula attoapt to got e kli flight for Wonor via foucton (requiriro, a U.S, visa
[ci icorov), Im any everit, Subj tald the CiO, that ho nas not coirig to the
J,so ratassy to rcguost tho visa, lue moula buo tho viole probles to xi! tho
rould hove to said iny vioa arcinaunts that vore requireù.
3o. Interostingly onough, losinor took the opportunity to brirg up operational
attis spain to Subj, and Subj used the encuine alscussion to rolo his stince
Literly clear to LoLinoy..
Tho convursatica ront sore of less as follons.
Loginor said: "You're ead it Ic." Suby said; "may should I be rad at jou?"
Logicor culd: "Socauso of l'adestio" (rotering to the fect that tho Sovs had
firot divon a travol requost to Viaion l'ajestic to co servicca).. You kior to
have to sireud it around anons frienda:" Suòg shruered this oft.. Then Lostnow
asica: "¿o you still mad?""
Subf roplied: "I's not sad, and I never ras. Loo!, Valentin. " (and then
ho ride his first
attempt at clorification, suving in effect that in normal
friendly natters thoy more like brothera, Subj exaggerated as 13 his menner-
Ecationine intizato catters liko "carriar" and "even unto doatihasta la querte)"
but soying that that was the culniction point "arything elso" mas finislod);
Lozinor sald (without battino en era): "I had sce buciness for you.":
Subj. cut his shorts "Don't bring he enythins- isportént of not important- you
can keep it. You sant to go for cocroes you rast to eo out with girls; - sita.
such ploasr; cuthirs up to that point.
Lid I want you to understand that
clearly, Don'i force no, and lot'a be good frierds.". Loginor saids "You'ro
sotting difficult."
Subj raglied:
"so, I'n not di ticulto had there's so damaçe.. I rado y
decision - end your chiefs will understand zy position."
RDED PRIZ
---
## Page 144
2.
Losinos tried açain:
"' Good faens of yours ran sprointed Chich or the
J.s. Recal Somico - Paul Giciron B'o a fricia: Of jour?"
GUIDAY
¿ubj cecaro a littlo heated in ropiya "tes, solo e good friond. Iri11
ainays do cloco to his. But you dot tdo very clocau any plans jou have los
Ful Giedro, forect. about thes, 1o that olcar? i son't do a codden thin. a
togo you indoratané trat.
To'To friends (yoi bad I), but sasido. being rrierds
rosiod!"
Loginor too% out a pleco of paper crá started to read iron it, astiás
subj is to knom tho can "Canardo Vetelri»-'approxiaoter 55 years old a loricra
Jea." (attached is a photocori of to pieco of saper lasinoy had been rcadirai
and which he left behind or Subj'a dost apparontly by ristaie.. It's in Pusis,
ee subj vas not able to transicto completely at cirst Glanco. Suvi plans to
retur the original to jogiriov uhas ho coaco by on 27 Jino. Inile Loginor mas
mesdira, Subj scid insistontly: "I donle knor tho saa, and I'c not colns to. do
an thing " LOsinov replied. "I's not ickirs you to do arything 1t's Just
¿hat I don't now (about hin), Abore Faul Giedro, he's a 8003 frierd of yours..
Siby said: "Forgot it.""
do Subj esteà tao C.O. - "aid I do wrong?" The C.0: replied that Subj had saso
recuticully, but he has to expect that the Sovs will keep up all kinds of
messures subtle, stall, or oven ereat, and not so subtlo. Sit the wey la clear
a22 ho has to do is say "no."
subj said that loginow had brought hiri a bos of "Purch" eigars (Cubor), end
subs in usual offered to pay, but losinor preased thes on his.
Subj then said
to the C.O, homontod an expression of jolloy on hon ho should hindlo that kind
as thing fron tho sous- take the gifts, altor offering to pay? refuse outright?
Do c.O, said ve nculd lve the suidance te needed for thst situetion.
S.. Tha CoO. Mill drop ground to Subj!s office carly next rock.
Ladeziuss tho Cir, tola Suba that there cas a rumor that Olen Nechiporenko
ass seen enound tomhe, Subj said ho kren of nothing on thät score, öut arioted
¿: strongly- since he was sure Olef zould tave contacted hig.
The C.O. under
scared that Subj do nothing about the rior.
Prai
1/6/2
allan's
'itseling this.
---
## Page 145
td-0n0d
укруї вібльмою си
5лет, міжний байки
ziee-
Маурисио Выбеляци
CARDED
---
## Page 146
1A-0D
Eduardo Willinana
• sello plato
guit fine in the Relie cut
Maurico WEBELMAN
COPIES MADE
CARDED
(P-11713
---
## Page 147
ta-indos
10'5 riaone 300% lasis
croCo 1551618
10?000
÷20
16l 45
.5? 17
Station
traces.
o station traces Paul CIDIS. GUIDRY
CA.
!
---
## Page 148
25
9.8026
miranda tani d bed ironed in at dis accice on CO July.
too) Logaron sold Sundoct that no
and recei;:. """"""
man ring to digo that "chog" moe dory dicappointed,
¿i died, ana trog rud hojen that Subj would Coopirstoo
subs anerrito monroot maid tie a broken rooord by noi) that he asili ma
•a friend to emila, that hu run in thelr sido, he was their none bat ho
can't do aig
a de here they woulda't try to force hire because
he- Juat cant: in anschine for ther
Locincr
Are us: to tood subg that Puvol Tatskor was leaving for
Rioacon on adit (e vaa in subjes officó to acco the arrangerento)i end would
ho returnin? in a ronth.. He icked thet sord Yatskoy con bring back to loncom
Subd said o tad chrendy told his: rothine he con't do arything for then, locinor
then nuked h
t.!:9
rote irant back to Subg anù Suba snid sot a thineo
He dolande
hanu do get citing "rudern" (A Societ astroon og had
atrended onc
12020) that mould ho sire with hin torinor
appreciatod
and tortid torn luof cordially.
/Corments
Many did moreo: doo the roco of ragor to had lert ir Sung's office
-re sene a is did aboded to inquire aöcuty and Subg loft it at that- no didnte
tillises
orini the sul
• 779
2 touch te ens the plece of paper to roturn to locinor/.
• 2.
In respirien tc coro inquiry subs centioned the names' öf sore deplicanto
for travel t..t
Erich.
Apparents do echolony ferruss to take place in loscen in du:'t 1966
Los noy had scared several applicanta to subja offices jullos medioz de.
Stonen ad me
te-(Jr. Fernandest card attached) and tro friends, Ir. Fernandez
cade, inquiries
best travel arrancoents.
She has not cose back yet.
• Licencisac
Lictano Lora had come to tho ofrice (?) on 21 July to arronge
travel to the coviot triin. Subj ooid that his amployee, tirien irila fitz, who
handies trus? ratters, hod told hia that leeaby had been invited by too Soviet
Ambassador anu clio that té ma a close friend to the dexican icb to loscon.
Tue Monteurt Travel dores, in Tiguana had transferred a reduat to u0j
to handle the ravel to the soviet Union as" touriäts for two "Sesoros" "Heria Jesus
de "Abakien and Stela Castro.
/Concert: the don. told subj te sented more info about these applicental
Cy to P 555.
P-2112
Hematio
---
## Page 149
3o• Phe Cod, redmini suda diat so mould Like additicaoà inconzation about she
individualo rio hod lost to stina she kerobiolorical Contess in loscoI. Bio
C.0, nusuested that Subg hore sureno in his offige extrac: soca the folder Subj
has all extra information tini do to adduced, ouch ss, address, 25o, rofessione
eto. Subj said he would try so caré it done bozore de lestes ca his trip ion 31
july). :
Jubf auxed if therd pas anyahing son about "lors" (Gastetres), De Ca, said
he had word from fashington abcs she errind rules la casa to (subj) mere to so
to Sentiaco de Chile. ihat te dois abcut seoins loro is his oun arfsir - but if.
he dons see Hors: Subj'is to anié reference to our "business" in Mexico as fer ag
voluntaring inforcution is concerned. Mat Horo does vis a vis Subj is aerb's
business.
she C.0, will cot to see subs tufore be leaved for Furope os 3I July.
---
## Page 150
75 July 1066•
Ditton
Tote: This. Is a translation.
(ty Lenvoy) of the brief report
wa sent to lite pol? (ria It.
vew/2) for Ilrama......
FIles: Talentin I6
1P 11712
shived send
Sisters)
Capy made to of
---
## Page 151
VALENTID SERGNESTIC LOCIROV
¡cohe de necimiento: 25 dicicabe 1927.
Fuplco: torocr Socrimin un ir suboisa Consulor de lo Ha
bajoda soviético en Losico.
Dosicillo: Jenncio istora, 131 Colo Tacubayoo
Autoabril: Chorrolet lapala 1965, Licencia 19 diploaltica.
Idionan que habla: espatol con fluides y rogular inglés.
Corrora:
5n 1955 se unió a la KeR
1955 n 1957 concurrió a una escuela de entrenanderto do
De 1957 n agosto de 1960, funcionardo en ol Cuartol Gencral
de la KGS: en losche
Do septicabre de 1960 a coptlembro do 1963, Aerogudo on In
Habana,
Cuba.
Dicionbre do 1961: Voj5 a juana Ecuador con el equipo
corlotico de Soecer.
En cote viajo llovó una cran suca
de sinoro porn los Pertidos Comunitas de Panoná y Ecur
dor.
17 mayo 1962: Pasó por léxico on tránsito para In URsS en uso
de liconciso
9 septienbre 1903: Fartlo de Cubo para rectosar o la USSe
Septloabre 1963 a julio de 1965, estuvo cono funcionario en
el Cunrtol Genorol de la nGb en Loscus.
agosto. 1965: Arribo a exco.
La Léxico LOCINOV reamplaco & OLEC H. NEOLIPORAO,
otro clocento de la-KuB, haciéndose cargo de todas sus fun
clones J do los ogentes de intoliconcia.
En enero de 1966
Intento influcnciar y reclutar a un chofer de la tabajada
Norteoricana en loxico.
LOCINOY es un arente de Inteligen
cla nuy capacitado y deussiado notivo. Debido a que no tione
otros responsabilidados citos, puedo dodicar el 95 do su
tienpo a la actividnd de Intoligencia.
Toncnos: conociniento
de que es funcionario de intelisoncia de la Mes desde 1955.
•Su Jojo Inmediato de cate croaniano, en Lexico, os INVid Ae
YATSKO%®
---
## Page 152
SECRET
22 July. 1966
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Information on Local Sovleta Passed to LIRAMA
In response to LITEMPO-8's urgent requent for certain
information on certain local Sovlets, COS on 22 July passed
the attached Information to LIENVOY. LIENVOY -2 will
translate lt Into Spanish and give it to LITEMPO-8 who will
In rum pass lt to LIRAMA:
Paul Dillon
Attachmenta
FILE:
P. = 3634
P - 11712
1.-
P • 885
P = 5530
P. - 5683
30-6-72-2
SECRET.
---
## Page 153
1d-0n0d
Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV
DOB :
23 December 1927
Positiona
Third Secretary In the Consular Section of the
Sovlet Embassy, Mexiço, D.F.
Residences Ignaclo. Esteva 18-1, Colonia Tacubaya
Automobile:
1965 Chevrolet Impala, License 19 DA.
Languages: Fluent Spanish, Fair English
Career.:
19551 Joined the KGB
1955-57 Attended the KGB Training School
1957-August 1960s Officer In KGB Headquarters, Moscon
Sept 1960-Sept 19636. Attache
In. Mavana, Cuba
December 1961g
Trevelled to Panama and Ecuador witha
Soviet soccer ream.
On this trip. he
carried a large sum of money for the
Conbunist Partles of Panama and Ecuador.
17. May 1962 g
Transited Mexico en route
to the USSR for leave:
9 September 1963% Lefê Cuba to return to the USSR.
septenber 1963;-July 1965:
officer in KGB. Headquarters,
Moscow -
3 August 19651 Arrlved Mexico.
agents and dutles.
In January 1956 he attempted to cultivate
and recruit a chauffeur 'at the Aperican Embassy in Mexico..
•TOGINOV Is an unusually active and capable intelligence:
Since he has almost nó overt duties he is able to
spend.about 95% of his time ca.intelligence actlvity.
Ce: 1036-9111
---
## Page 154
Sovlet Intelllgence Officers Ststloned In Mexico
1: KGB (Committee for State Security)
Ceputy Sergey Second v. PAY
Aleksandr V. PRIKHODKO
OFPICERS:
Yevgenly 1. BEDRIN
Ivan A. BEKETOV
Alekaands M. BROVKIN
Vladimli A. DOLCOV
Yevgenly N. CORLITSYN
Boris A. KAZANTSEV
Vladislav S. KORMUSHKIN.
Valentin I. KUCHEROV
Svyatos Lav. P. KUZNETSOV
Nikolay S. LEONOV
Valentin S, LOGINOV
Vasilly S. MIROSHNIKOV
Leonid V. NIKIFOROV.
AleRsandr A. NIKITIN
Vidimir N. RADVANSKTY
Viadimir I. SHPAKEVICH
Georgly S. VISKO
Pavel A. YATSKOV
Yurly ZHURIN
Boris S. ZOBNIN
2. GRU (Mutary Itelligence).
Chlet: Vladimir N. SOKOLOV
Deputy Chiet: Georgly A. SHÄHUCHKIN
OFFICERS:
Aleksands M. DENISOV
PetT F. CORELOV
Vladimir P. GOROBETS
Yurly N. ISAYEV.
Anatolly V. KARABACH
Viktor L. KHUKHOREV
Yurly A. MITROPOLSKTY
Valerly V. SOKOLIN
Ruslan A. TUCHNIN
Konstantin R. VORONKOV
Ivan V. YELFIMOV
---
## Page 155
14-00000
20 jug 66
Seat.
that the you wig lit
print rit
can clevote 85%
no consular wort
I 1 hours a weal office hono
Ville do
7145572
vite
Zilos Valentin
-LoGiNor
PS. Jame applies to the 7 entell fue
CP-I1112
---
## Page 156
Paie
10.a
(lection)
Frosting tie too at 1730 34. Valentin "ol
ju in to male a relephone call. Apparoatly
ME :
(co:::
pain chinos that I ras able to hear wis
that
ie
sir ior that. righe, that it night. he dreams
chat
"oodid tad cosurion iSundiv). they coild
so. sriaai:."
'3!.
Troy malhod for-quite a whiie and se
seamed
guess
mllant." Ho told her that he would take care of
everyohind itista
I went
outside thé soo-
1100000. Per. 10
finished
talkios,
he ranted to justify:
hiasolt to +0 br
wife is
in
saying
that he is a batchelor because his
caravase.
S122221631-192151
2019
Toch cer thing is roadil since I know that my friends
10N'E. 0000
iO.192
S:znd33,
tha:
is
rouse to.ea.
- I has nade my progran for today,
I0 57j10
loite.
to take ny wife and grand-
child
to the counter and eat outside the house.
3'2E
::*
1?59.
wich is the hour to close,
my wife and
Trunichilc
alicadi there.
Mien SILNIKOV arrived
to drink
3. 303r.
loris idoolint pretty bad frox last night's "drinking
Do!!'"
Me tirary solebrating the Albassador's return.
He
told, re tres
wore srintingdl night.
But at this time
1t was rainst oiie ned so that I couldalt close up and leave.
the store.
wife asked sin wey he, bad alwiys thought
difforon ly isic)
in not coxing to eat at our
house.
And- oa
the moment to said that le told core. My wife shot me a
"Miria
kere;
loo's and dinally sillikov, broke the silence saying;
I. will be back ina minute"..
Then he left in the
rain which
naied i lictle.. It then started to
ans.1
ar dore We hass devan by the ambassado oka naitor
(STRYZISY) 1
le sial' pirk in front of the store but in Gelati,
the -street
running pirillel to the store.
iri to teli
he
They siLNiKoy came
was ready.
lie shut up the store,
got into the
car and drove to arnoise: ve paried the car in the street and
entered ay house.. Once inside the first thing they did was to
inspect the house in great demail eves the
"azotea"
"I think
that the house
pleased then.
They made me show. then
everything
including the bathroor and bedroots.
Then we sat at the table
to drink teguila.(la copa). and See;
chicken, una soja,
ands rutsado witchy wile served barbesued
they ate with relish,
o: so it
spered
me since they
ate everything
served. them
accospanted by bleasant chatter.
But he didi't
even mention
SECRET
extract froin Ricaul /i Nite
Catted: 26 rug is attached
to Ricuul. Contact Depart
cated 230upust 1966
---
## Page 157
1d-0d0
BECRIT
I asked subject if ho hed mentioned stilikove pornographic negative
to the latter. At firet Bubject sald no, then your that he had asked
BlIntsov about It but Slinikov sald that the negative didn't belong to hier
but to Vallly who took it back to Moncon with hin.. Subject added that Valli
had roturied to the UsaR about two weeks ago. (Coments This 1a moat probably
BUTSV whom Subject calla Vasilly and who returned to the vaiR on 24 July.)
(Becond Coumant:
Thie' 1a
another exonple of one of 81intkov'e vulnerabilties
evaporating into thin air)..
Concerning the item in the notes for Saturday, 30 July, In which
Blintkov hid in the ballroon for twenty minutes becauge two other coveta
came in, sibject had the following to say about these two soviets.
ntin (E forro), then follows a perfect description of
LOGINOV.
ledinirs here follows a good description of KORMUSHCE Includin
not Vladimir.
I asked Subject about the discrepancy In the 19 July peeting wher
he seld that STINKOV and PRABiCINiN had come to the store on Saturday
16 July but bly notes said, that PRASHCHICHi and him replacement had come.
Subject nata that he docan't knou ho PRASACHKIN'a replacement 186. Me aleo
couldn't explain the dlacrepancy, stating that he couldn't remember the
7. Lalso acked his about his Itemof 21 July in which at the request
of VALETIN he had delivered two cages of refreacon to General Cano 32. (We
save no soveca at colo address. de Changed It to Meneral Icon 39 CaKTi'e
The VALeNTIN noted above lie LodINd
then Subject
delivered the two cases only a Soviet vomen was at home.
he described thie
address as a angle house nich is undersolns renovation inside.
In alecussing STinKY', recent work fixing up the Embasay I asted
who actually aid the
pork. Dibject eatd that the sovlets do not like to deal
with establialed sirn for, repaire to the Embassy because they charge too
They prefer to deal' with mall independent, people whom they can beat
down on the price. Bubject loons of two nich individuales
Licoil Contact Report, 17 Gugust 194,6
BECRET
P-11712
---
## Page 158
16 August 1966
There Is no derogatory Information on the BOSTROEM
couple in the United States or Venezuela,
However, we
have obtalned the following blogrephic Informatlon on them
from Venezuela.
Nicholas Juan BOSTROEM Schrelber, born
23 January 1915 in
St. Pétersburg, Russla.
Cedula $983566®
•Yenezuelan Passport #207100.
• Trävela::17.December 1957.
-left Malquetla for Miami, 30 October 1961 entered Verezuela
from Mexicos 22 November 1961 left Venezuela for Mexicoi
26 December 196l ertered Venezuela: 6 January 1962 left
Venézuela for Mexicog: 5 December 1964 entered Venezuelag:
19 December 1964 left Venezuele for: Naxicoj 16 March 196€
left, Venezuela for Mexico.
Malentine GRUSDOVLAVRIK de BOSTROEM, born
2 October 1923 In Breslau
Malquetla: for Maxicos 25 June 1965 left Venezuela for
Distribution:
Or l9r V. EOPQANOV'D PENAQUM On 17 Aug 66
LOGUINOVP-
18: 50-6-91/2/7
Nicholas Juan EOSTROEM Schreiber Pe
7-11712
---
## Page 159
• 11 Aug 66
AND FOR RECOND
In sia morthly report Cos Auguit 1966, LICAlin enla TArsOr on ed to
navo taxon PRIKiuso a planes mon I nobod shy no sought that, bio
navered!
PRIKHOO de not herA (he left 20 June on homi loavo). PRIKIODSO and:
beon entering the funny through the min door and was soon working in
window # 220 Mos YATSKOY la entering throush the rain door and wao
soon tonice at thie vindow. rareroy aleu had the sae contact dith
MixtUror who pRicHORo hed greviountr hed. Nor that Yerstor hoa
alsO LOSE (4 145)e LICALla sinko that LOCIMON la probably tolns hia
place, (Thie last statement la not olear, whether locitor lo tatans
YATSKOV a pLaco 1a ArStOres ald Job, shich would be mont lostoel Or
Whether LIcallA dainke WalRoY nay now be In the PRIODO Jobe In any
CanO, PHIKHOIKO hinelS should be beok acontarily.)
R 685
P-2270
P-9026
P-?1712
---
## Page 160
Cyps
On Sunday 2 Cup 66 et
can, with sevent perple
in it enter the Carla road
fa Cremarma concent
dentify my f the secants
P- 11712
---
## Page 161
1.
Ser oy dorstration.
24, did riat,
"it too tore do the
Tchlonirs Soviet travei arranurentor
ironitro, and child, Miklta, Confirmed en Sabcna-f9r
•caládo Gerchodorto, truno (ire), cadideos, Cordra and Vladirin, Salers, 7
Re nicencinio Liganno iron cored into Subj's offaco 28 dili (?) and mos
VCry
"hon Sabl did art tve ccacircod: trovod to satellite countrios
(includin lunania cho csdicule in) sendy, lora runded and said to rould go
take tig aron,dronts Sees there, Plans atos in loscoe a renthe
¿us freo tickos on torontos lorigo so ladrid. Jubf booked his for tavel fron
Madrid t0:0
Masterdam, and returne
Valentin
ee dropred in to Salj's offico on 27 July but Susa nso too
busy- to acc
nor called dull or 23 July and zade an appointrent to see
Subj at 1200
on p9 3ul" it the cleo in rexico Hostauront neor Subj's offico.
me C.O. utricord to subo sha: so conticio to ploy the sero tune with losinoy
di triendo, too- rosi,
30 july the Polo too duba bricel 1a hio officc, Subj's wife hac accompanied
hia to the orrie bush:so :..
1all le muraring it while dubg is may do his.
sordere do subj, hin cice to not cutting of the
on the rife Eather, around, Suba ras solo to
Tic aurooted
poner play ly anchor ada
Yatskora trail armen
tor Pricon to not Hith Subj junt to contra lavol
,. ask Subj acain in they could bring Suty
Mord so to tho flor de lexca too, dir contributed
nothing to the conc-uncon
had civon PriModto MiCe dear lu enins tem back tro kilos of cavier).
For the promised additional infrination on the croup tho were piro to the
icrobiolorical Concuba in dozoca (so provious Contact Renort. for complete list),
Subj turned over to the c.0. tou ittiched isst which stres only telerhone numbers
of the profcasicals scine to una corress, and in sone cases the positions.
To coyo told sother thar to mit drop in to the office, if he could do
anythine for Fei.
"oto Guld not due back until the end of fugust.
Cy to Pati
919137.
11712
9-9371
P-2712
?
11917
---
## Page 162
14-00000
er had to do cont dare card durin
i warn thi dion out that Wage tad and hernetiri,
Masoo (006) care do A 1110 du for a sup os "tea"
tie sun oldalniron as every aturda, Cinco 10
coco messagin, and out tier atustede lo told me that in his countr
(cage) can tave one ver. dorod succums word tre, inve too enlaes
no their fine roles. While die pople ac
arman nates canuage ee the prople an in; thnt every daccaculty cais.
mdraco mic e cith ard site calmness min firinlar ou can wine de
podia tara tea applain mi lots en ros lace nto berter 15 not vari
od, hiel could uncessiond, and what lie acant for te.to indergraid tas
tO cree monto recally our come all diceiculties, and us his alue
Poil to iront an she bour de triumph.
Thead friends (wove) ire
ear obedient in seir superiors the will
even sind 20-25 arutes in
shn antercos en a store, so wey would not be discovered by treir
pas ja chat ho penco to my triend Estanislao (SILAIkOV) toddy:
ans an ideassureder cut los ue betarion) at 1140h horeruse to friends"
(sors) came in ros one at then is rone other that the incurd secretar. of
unn aborandor, a houga be (tro Asbassador) is 70t in jesteo,
wizzin tamin lot di power to discarias rece
win. do ca
sipline er ten duate.
Pranalation fo
50 Quly 1966
---
## Page 163
1018,80 1 14
unt it.
le candlana pileis lind to ho mont thre one day in
.".l10.
'1.19.
denial que thre notice dean out thne the had been proporite
or i never proo: 150 ca long and 60 em wide.
only her daide us to came in at lilo in cord cup of "ten"
iris
il.o
i..:.
Me him sie chichigron as every. vitirder, sinco'it
1,0F
!!!'
i me tuit otarted, in told me. thnt in his country
we lag mound wire the door die car lazer:
ers: du precin obarete corrid sth dewelro!
nrin
trii
well. a their fine robes. While the prople se
Alin
to have a bruin, small as a finin ot ricio:
Mr mopin so in that ever: difficult: in
i959
T1?1
si.hicolnnegs.and.finnlly.ou.cnnwin..r:
15.
dis this tome, ince his sprich is no: vy
and and what he mint for me te intergland as
nil cirriculties, and thus hitli
70
i2e4 -53:
" trumphe Tege friends. (ove) are
ve
the: sit;
insan the
will even stay 20-25 minuts ir
.5321T
ter mould not be diservered by their
wor arcaned to my friend Estonislao (CrlNIKOV) bodny
hind
sodo cub jo. the bathrcom): at 1140h becnudo two priones
(Sovas
in amate fir as none other thet the sc secre ar ai
the Amar enor, diçura ho (Mo inbassador) is not in lexico, thuesslks:s
roblike
Heart lint.
resets iner a lot os poiser to atarinkir these
who dr d.
"midt to too disciolino ni the state.
LICouL Mater
30 July 1966
---
## Page 164
27 July 1966
d.::81001
CONTACT KARI: • ORONSKY
SUNCE 1168001-1=1:
1. 10. 18601-8 on 27 July at 1930 hours (COIGNE was slik).
The mector me danil tectes tects indIset the next meeting for COIGNE
in and location Meanesday, 10 August. Tell XIGNE
no wul mr 1..01l.19000 pores lor adlary for the month of July and
at the end of cami ho
will owe nim another 800 pesos for August.. I
always pay dir it: indof she minath.
Do turnt beer two dudin microphones and I gave them to
Feldinam.
My may noses wire installed in his sliop and we have
taken the Prora our
The bene paper attached was found in LICOWL'A
noes (pride top rue 250 of June. He said he did not recall how it
had goteen there and did not know scho had written and drawn on the
- l'" tory od since the word written on the picce of brown paper:
and ine-last ory in LICOWl's notes are the same - but the handwriting
Only LK OWL should have access to his notes.
KWI.
'swatted anes from 27 July inectlug (translated by lEBNING:
SIL MINU
Wiriestir.
Tochy my friend Estanislao (SILNIKOV) came.to
Trik a loa
at il bout tom, and I asked him about the photographs
which he hail god me he wänted me to make from a negative which he has.
He answered to he was going to look for the negative and bring it to me.
thy nother our of his friends (tc. Sovicts) wis Icaving
d! now it was Visiliv's curn (BUfSEV did leave on 24 July),
outbout? years old and now it is time to teach him how
since for thoscof us who live in a free
country, is lite of this people seums bad to us because everyching is
different from what we do. They reach us to love our Progress (?), to
live well with pur neighbors, to help the poor,
to give food to hagers.
While they comato nur country 10 create disorder and crcate distance
within our tints and in our work, and they infiltrate themselves
everywhere in order to sow hatred. They show us evcrything which ts
produced in their country and how much they have. But they import
things from our countries through their embassies. Daily, their sedition
movements can be seen. In fact, a month ago a group of Mexicans
(in haing) obtain. visas for Moscow and in the (Sovier) Embassy they
were given? blisy" with as much vodka as they could drink. A good
startin get igno Know the country which so "foolishly" hopes to improve
to mentally ducky ird who cannot realize the evil they do in supporting
thoadho soir inflocion wherever they go.
After sccing people come-
eviry daylug hc. intossy to gel propaganda we can only think that
their work is (valic).
Thursday;
21
July:.
Tochy at 1045 Sr. Valentin (LOGINOV pr. KUGHEROV)
came in to mid the colophone and asked soncone to wait for hin at
Constal Cano 32, and as he was about to hany up he stressed that they
be alre to wall for him at 7:30 pm. After talking to whoever it was,
he asked m. lo send him, at the same address on General Cano, two
case of quinine wirer and gingerale by 7 pm, without fail, I delivered
then in perse and took them into the kitchen and I noticed that the house
wes being repriend and that they were getting ready for oompany, since
there were sir nil iptiles of liquor there. (COMMENT: No Soviets
live at General Cano 32, NIKTIIN llees at General Leon 32 and,
---
## Page 165
2 5 JulJ.10
Note: These are traces from
the Linnvoy Listering
• Fost on.
Inguinov, whe Is or
Lirand and Literpo/e.
Sil!
Files
valertin LotINer (9-1, 712)
---
## Page 166
з АдРобУ
10460063
6 80p.63
12 Bop.65
13 воро65
37 Sepo65
6 00to65
l'onlesos
VILINDI S. UT: TOV:
Lonlo111os Tainclo Intima llol
Aerodiindo cosa faster siertorio on tuncinco do Vloo CAnonl
Aido Chovrolet Iopalà 10101065 plucas Da935 (datos de Die 1965)
De sabano coafirran es lligado tropodento de Hogol es os
malo de loe 23110 hrse
JORGE ROSAS PErOs do CoRañO do Attoo1aso Precunto por
VOlIRoY poriuo guiero abor quo hados sobró la llegia del
Bollot teruninno quo asculaunto están on Venasola, poro 1105an
ADILINDO CURUELO LOnGi? CuCO SuSIA A M COlOga LOQUITOU
7 sonidon quo al tallos iranteno so va a noenostas do viol.
yo qun dol quejo de Viaso da Venciola jocon al vuolo do Cubanco
y ajus unicananto so lanin bajo la pragontecion do pacaportoa.
VAl-DIC de llr Francae lo pluo la docusiontación pura ol
CutomidoCo RIDO CASTIL: ShoRAy Otros jare que pueden
1lecar a siondo a tatualar ou sa triverascad vasssoto luction
orcorno prorrs do viajos las ricao solieltr vienes
(oonstantesante, beta Cujos on Soma forillios os atendido por
LOGUIEnY)
Fo trullado a reunisiooetol dol Cueryo Counular jars ol
JOFO: MIJAS COSMOLI avisa la Ilogoda do 10 daportlatas
TUBOSO LAQUINOY Do enenTes de atorios dichos Juendoroso
---
## Page 167
25 008.65
28 008.65
Jo Novos
# N0w,63
8 Nov 63
10 NOTOGY
15:N0v.65
17 Nov.65
19 Nov 63
30 Nov 65.
IJ En0066
18 ED0,66
linco roboracionis para ir al puorto do Masoeldo,
LO atlAndO pOr NENINTO JOSIIS de la Padajada Cubano, quo
an Tucatán do
encuentras los barcos rusos "thafiro"'y ofros
or al que lioy un lestonado por en losión do una oaldora.
So reune con CARLOS BLINÇO®
JULIO PLATAS do la CiTON...
co pone a su disposlosda.
Resorvo por cortonla do Aviaclón paonjoo pari la aliano
y pAra SUGENIO GORLTTTINE®
•¡URIANO GANCIA COnJul Cubano du Nórtes, durorma licidonto
dol barco dondo 6o116 LoaloRado VICTOR MOROSHOY
MIRIANO QUICIA nucyacento Inioma estado de galud dol
reatonado MeRosulovo julás un transadado a la cludad do li6z1oo
para dor atendido por lOs dOCBOreS CONCILI" CARDENAS de MérIda.
T DI DISO ENILINÃO SORIANO dA MOTICO.
Reserva pasalo o cuis para el lesionado MOROSION.
ALUCINDRO FRITODAS OFFOCO a SOLIO ANOSURA COnmEl de
ranando presentarte a LoGUINoY
Procuentomento dol Club Frango lo Lacon cobroe por adondos.
1F'..
Cormala con al Concejoro de Panand InC. JOSE B. CALVO Ine
b
¡enas daclaracionne de iu Frecidente puslicadas doy en Exooletor.
CA.DIO EMILINNO SCHIANO le Inforsa la alud de en crinero:
ruso, a quion posteriorunite ópars do apendicitis.
CURLES O NUELLER do la rabilada do Entados Unidos, soldalto
la visa jara ou esposa ELdIvE.
i RooLaca a su BESIa SCRERRO FLORES que la otra ocasIón que
tuó Anidado a su flosta antatieron snos nortemarteanos Lase
DO. dIsculpa y 10 15718e 60l0.
---
## Page 168
14-10000
21 E00.66
20 FeD, 66
1А F0D. 66
21 P0D•66
- 22 Feb:66
28 F00.66
10.8130.66
LUCASIO UrUMiTy pado a RITILA do Toolco lloctrodoedidea
alistas magnétiena para la erabadora ines de LOQUINOV.
Io atonilas por ol DIo SORIANO y operano sl lo de febrero
on la Contral sufrurelea.
Rosora panojos a Mazatlin.
Avids a CONZALEL de Villasmia y comando, quo salo e
Contracoalcos a vietlar la cerca dol barco sulde lo coboten
con alfino perodia de rise puerto.
ExICÍA, Corresporoal de The Neda, de pone do couardo para....
huoer una icundon®
Por Indionolonea de PRIJNODKO, LleVard a SARITA ROSSENPIELD
$ PIRIA GONZALEZ do Tho Novs Invitaciones para la sacopolón del
día 23 en la rebajado.
SANTIDO RÍCO de sonrias honerlos Maritiono, Infor a
LOGUINOV que los barons maos "Thulonida" y Shelengaldo que en
dias pasados ostuvieron cargando en coatzacoalgos; donde estuvo
LOGUINOs reiresarán du cuatro diuo não por lo que quiero sabor
•al os poalble que un barco yun anlo ol dia 18 oou destino e
La Habana secrooo ol 260.8n carcar 5,500 toneladas de unfai
LOQUILOV no comprendo coro suu pobiblo oso y orae que ses obro
bargo of que
venga a onrpora RIco ratipioa que de trata del
"Thulonalla" ouyo capitán irioró a STETLER de proytuo que sosten
carla para oca foola, y gulero rocorias que debo darso avdeo
a la capitanla del Puorto con tres dias do antiolpaelón.
FRICKA do InvIta o oonar e su dondolllo y progunta ad ya
tiono ?lotos sua popolun para pudor viajar.
SALVIDOR VAZ de Reprovintaciones Haritinad qulos acopald
• LOQUINOV on su ditino viaje a HasatIan, informa Sonillarono
la llogada do don baroon runos al "ortidr y el "Venuedarly" que
próstemento llorarín a acupulço, pidiondo que una peraona do la
Esbajada ruyo a ese quorto para que sirva de interproto.
---
## Page 169
1d-0d0d
з NВ0.60
Hs0.66
y Nwo.66
17 M80.06
29 180: 66
31 Abr:66
21. Ab5.66
82. Abr. 66
29 ADr. 66
26 Abr.66
SALVADUR PAZ Munanento Infensa a LoGUINOY que de Aoapuloe
•1 barco
que 1loçd neorosta para castos 10,000 dolninos, para
cambantiblo, cassoa do puerto y proviolasos. LOGUInoi ditossa
que los dará radia el lundo, dunndo rodreso os coreojoro vasto
do Veraorus donde datá abundlando al barco "Thuldanido®.
ABELANDO CURRELO Cônoul Cubuno, 10 jErita para el proisias
laneo a la Farta del lognro.
Dó Mazaslda ol Capitás del faroo "Lyra so comunica en
riSO Con LOQUINCY
roio rente saint em unes
so reintra inflana con MOnET FEDOR jum que lo d8 80o.
SALVADOR TAI quire noutrarlo loa diaprolofonea ruspeoso
al arribo do barços surcaltos e puertoo naolonaios y vor que
opinlós "tionen vasedeo sobre on y ros o ustodos cono embajade
ruedon tomar cartas on el asunto".
E1 DIO JOSE LUIS ALVARIZ GALLOU DO POPUSTRO ENGUTION 1O.
roclam haborlo dejado plantado ayer en Cuersavada. 90s8 wis
ofroco tivitarlo para su cumploadios ol dia 21,
So ruce corro do la reservucianos durarito la permanenta
en México del sonor BOITCINKO VIce Tropidente do Insurtos en
Mosoi j dono acosparuntos à la conferonotá de Agencios do Viajes.
CUNDELO 10 LivItA AL iGUAl que a TArTION& NROSHIHOYy
BORNUSITo a la recopotón dol dia 25 en la rabajada de Cube en
despedida del LiC, CARLOS GONZALIS PARRODI y OrFANIOOdA POR 98
Cuerpo Consular®
COrTIna Con PERCEDES TRIVIÑO do la Aso01a018n Mesionna do
Agencias de Viajos, sobro lia aotividados de los delegados rusoa
a la onneanalón de furioso en Guodalajara.
DEo AMARAL que d1jo ser persoguido polleloo do su pale natal
Brasil, pido a LISEINOY esllo deniro do la ecbajada, porque on
1a de cuba de lo dan negado, LOGVINOV roouarda que hay e traiado
++ +
---
## Page 170
3 Hay. 66.
10 1aye66
18 May, 66
19 H8y,66
20 Mey, 66
84 Mạy 66
26 May 66
30 saya66:
100J86066
• y roconlonda Deo lA enDojidO do alEta DETO pOlO LaS1RO •
Astrleano.
De poso en contucto con ol capitán dol barco "volchoria
en verionis y profunta al ya ajaroold ol sartnero ruso.
(rootoriomento so supo que dicho martnero habla faltado o u
baroo por cuensiones de faldao)
EI De JUAN MANUEL FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEL que dijo Dos repu
contanto dol Gollerno del rotado de l6xloo, lo colloita vlea.
¿DoUINOY lo invita o quo paso vañaza a la albajado.
ERICKA LINENUN InèletO
on Bener que documentoe pire poder
aprovechar nu viaje a lurojo y vialtar MOsOdo LUGUINOV obrado.
hablar con él eubajador al os novesario " por la olmpeste qua
010nt0 107 0118ª:
Liana la atorolón al carento de in Agorojo Vagon a Cook
porque atoniro que bandon paoaportos para sus visao so pao.
: blon roquialtadose
CONIOlORAdO pOr KAZANISIV, COMICA aL LID. FENNATO FIORES.
TrUnDs do Rulaoloreo Extorloros el cunstanto robo y entrarlo.
do plooue on loo cutos diplonatico.
DAVIO ORNELAS do Mundos Toures agradeco ol oboogulo de
Pollodos y rovintas de la cubajada.
SOCORRO PLORES vuUlloa de vien al pasaporto que no siono
Cocha de voncimiento, Locuirov manirlesta que solamonto de viese
• los pasaportão en rogla y que no lo importo que oos persoen
vaye on violte ostolale
Heneri jasajos para veracrusi
HERTA CONZILVE PADILLA raCIa ol 1noumplinlanto dol
contrato do arrendaniento do la cosa en Cuernavaca para ol
porsonal do la enbajados
---
## Page 171
0.8517.65
39 Jun 66-
83 Jun. 66
_89 June 66
5 201.66
6 J01.66
7. 301066
19 J01.66
SALVADON PAS DIITA plía lo agulo para obtener lo roproce
tación de los baroos ruana que llegan al puerto de Veraoruto
_porque de 10018!8 un. Holos en qua dioon que Rusta da a Importar
un organanto de tuberlo, MovINoV lo ayudari pero no lo puedon
diooudir por toléfono.
LI' DIO JOSE LUIS ALVARIL DALLOU del Instituto de Interpretes
y produetaro, la pido llovo al proyoctor de alno, "porteo ono
cotorno dioras doçoos do vor vio polioulas".
GLORIA ALTARO quiere rounirno pare plation con algunos
runodonarios de la enhajado, LOGUINOV osta de nouerdo es que.
nda al viornus "duspues de Ins olados de incles"
Le Buñorta JENNiDE del Instieuto de Interpreteo y Traduos
tores, so aviao que oun olouce corto hosta te promin omin
De la aconola Morrlu Hormanose Inforn sobro ol choque
dos auso Chevrolet Impala placas LInDA Y que robaron al rade.
BOOVINOV trasliará lo del onguro en La Provinointo
ERICKA LUENUN a su recroço de Puroja dO repOrtOS LOGUINON
so reolas que no se despidlo e Informa que olono mon de
mes con sue documentos jara quo pane a recogerlos.
MORTAN do la leencia Mundos Toure, despune do Bratar pobre
Vengo soplana al mal binos de LoGUINov of dle que estuvo en e
oasa, puos hasta su familia o solesto. LiGUIROY recoslende lo
mo novelas de anor que pollotados porque lo haso proguntae
que no puede
--_----
contestar.
PROgUntO al LIO. MORI PLANCARTI OTIOIAl MayOr de lo Clanra
de DijuEndOs, ol BOSITO dol TiaJo a Rusta dol Diputado JESUS
RANCHEZ, por podorlo otergar la viale
Coationa vioa paro ratados Unidos a nombro do VLADIN
SITLANTEY COrTAOpOnDAl ruDO do Imanto en La Habana, setualmonte
on Noxico.
---
## Page 172
iIY' Juda66
19. J0l.66
29 5038,66°
- 7 =
•1 INGO MATUEL ARITA do la Foorntarta do loourado MIdrauloo
SO 001101ta la Visa, paro solotire un 0014re00.
El Enta jador de Cuba HERNANDEL ARMAS, DAdO DO AyUdO O
"US STON ANITO NUCOtTO OL DIO ALFONSO MARTINEY ALVAREZ guÍeN
dodo: astatir al Cóngroso No Morobioloçlo on Masod o trotiselvo
Ost! AIVIEndo para lOs FOntOJOO dol 26 do Jello on LA Baler
a remira pera m camblo de SuprecIonio, LOCUTROV LO esperS.
El ILOo LARA PLORES Informa haber cooluido cablo des
caba jador JOSS ITURRIALA on dondo ratitton in instacion, DeT
tal suttro pollotta la vlog, y podor plosion co l00 Agrocdos
Culturaly Conarolal ruoDO. LOQUINOY dar quateso L they on.
LA onbajada los pondra on contadto con osas porsonado
BOTAs Froovantonento ds bungado LocUINOr on la orbajado jusa,.
aln que no enouantro dste..
Juldo 22: 40 1966.
---
## Page 173
14-00000
Tall.:..
SUBJECTE
Forture
20
l 1i00T5 +1-2712 75 septerter 1066
manjo",. Subj's hone
910÷9.00.
auble office
4
Do Thn C/0 eu 30 sid sent to Sunfla hobe the évenire of 20 Sap for dinner.
To astablishe mind ur reirtlinghly with Sury's mife, this arcidin une of.
To othere vore present beatre un, and sint and his
i not Joln at the dinner tables A bricht toich on the murt
of went wan that no wore served the cartor that Pothodho had recently hrought to
Subje
Subja wife, Fathere
La an intelligent end charuine person
• She arko wi th
emat percention of her expertences in the Soviet Inton, when whe had accrayonded:
her hanhand thiert a few years ago, Althrugh Subj has told the C/O thnt his wife
doos not knon of the Intelligence relationship brtween them, it apfeared evident
to the c/o thet subjls aife conniders the c/o in sore kind of opecinl roletionshin
to her hunhard:
During the evening subd reported to the C/o sorothine that lillio hid said
at their cret on queat, which he had ouitted in repo-ting their mont. In mrinking
uhout the for con tracel aconta uttending the IntesT conference in osci in.
October isor, milled sinted me are interested that as many travel as cy as
rossile duty conortion. maybe've could later on use one of thenut tho
roblen with Mr toxicans lu thio- they are vory affble and simmetico, tut when
it renches the mint of a strairht proposition, t'ey are all lchickrn."'"
2. On 23 Sent Subj ranorted about the visit of Valentin Loginow to his office on.
21 Septe
Tre, went to the nearhy Flor de lexico for coffee. Sibj, "ho had boon
Instricted tr move norther re Pavel Yatokov's prorable assimoment when he retime
to Mexico didn't have to. Locinow burat nut to Subji. "You have to contrat: late
mol on the Concul General," Subj aoked who's sons to be tocinovle sostetant.
Ioninoy answered, but Suld does not recall the name. Subj asked' "ihnt Job are
you plannine to Sive Tatakoy?"
Lostnov saked my de?" Sung sald moutrea big
shot". Locinor stated ile'll get a Job, He will be sone Pirat Secretary of sone
Depertment,."
The reason that Incinoy cane by to. Subj is that he wanta to investlente the
shabby treat-ent that had been accorded the delegates to the Miernbloler?cal Congress
in loscow (surj had told the c/o that the attendees to the Contress didn't ron
Files:
CCi
8-2278
P-11712
F8i55. (p.1)
0-541)
COPIES MADE
P-11112
---
## Page 174
COFIES MADL
love hotel decramil long, lost had to ho pait un 15 leds a? "orere lialsey'ly).
loilnor was estar: ll losestinating on conplaint no the lerterna sho ind attendede
Subj ailed 16 !...des lo miar lo rite lie spor: do intotet. lerinos le.
"No - ligher e to tir "trition of Pourion"
nici
propered "Hot
lọ Inay g: i
lj "You are unahle to do arttline now.
"pelic mous con
recommend cognunús -uton Merlean that world he able later en to mee
a Job in the ever dis latinero" /Commente Despite the way hey renated te trowg
phratin of thir
on, subs sold he had the imenssion that lordron war listine
Subj to reconce vurcone mio erald toke Subj's place, "At eny rite, suby had die
latter in mimi
ven hr arvored lostnov/ Subj replied, "ou have tore contact
this have cil lins of people. It's not necessary for re to recomend mortie.
to you.""
suf chamed fir nubject and asked, "what should I take to the "payo" lot
ILTURIO?)?"
danov snid "Don't make the some miatake you made lost tire - you
brote inctin mut ins mtortals. That's not the custorin cur country. wine
sone third lorden but, donon't cont more
than tin or three dollorg."
3ó. Subo also n
rocd that on 22 Sept he had lunch with fernaida ond ion caldania.
siby told the hut utony tire in the not when our ofrice had waked
july. for
recoirendation?
rescare in pover
ent, Suby hod iven Saldonin' nree
độg thát
thuo in the li
Fic auranintration Saldanta had rorked no endlet.
ca: in
do of the Sceretariot or Public Suestion. a
•Ir the Sub-Secretortet of Etuentions
Hien sube harl
to the
danto had been instrumental in atting hiton offic
emmondan works in the Pran nile Funeunef. the,
iT. anc
What sung's riftee before her fustand cater or tore en g22cà.
fe for lunch).
Fernanda told Suby: that
more are renese
Vinc
to True
innd a-"tribunal."
trice to
jet sarancs in prance, but that was turned don t the perch cinernt.
there ure:
in in lor
two neetinga, in lovether in stockicle, ne in "arci,
in
in
viet tat"
he lind translated, she started enlar phot
has for Batter fare
Curati: ).
---
## Page 175
14-00000
3.
called l'exicon "ut f vietnin; those furpose it was to rublich the truth about.
Vintrun and colirt, rimy to send to Vietna via France. On meekendo the soup
visits villagon for lontro
proletarias and talke to the workore and perpente.
terrarda montion d to Juby that thore ver a grail nicklar cup in the Jealoh
coatunity, and sir wited to know shout it so they could join forcess Suhy rold
he knew of nio such Til in the Jenian community.
men Permanda arked suby to
Join the priup and umort it with monoge Suby turned the mopooltion down. lle
anda the Viet or torn evictira - they were dues of the Cöruntet oninese and
To th lethere to my, emundn called Suba "o hourceouse
jabi sold Mul: umo Juan muo not present for the ilogicion, he
do sugaloo-cationed main that ho had found out that
Unran of yoon Toro
and hunger out c) or arca lopes Toura vere definttoly reler te
stend thr
Raped day!
25415
PIOT
COPIES MADE
---
## Page 176
T
I then astiod his hoe the purchase of the watches un
cooing, alugg.
So told no that the borning after our
last poettog tanta could have been on 10, Soptembers,
" Saturday.:
at about 0s50 hol went
to the Trade Dolesation building and ached
for bio sood intend,
out of untchen but
nt they ospoct-none soro In 15 days at:
hich thee Bubtoot, should come
back and sAty will soil pla 91)
- he
wants.
COMMENTS
In his noted for 1s september Subjeot's
e8y5
that SuNIkoy and cone in to nay that Subjootle sortet
frionds, had wanted to
-ELve
has watch for. 116:501010642/22
I: September but
that tho solotal are notlout of then but tant
Fee would come ta
Isitoon daye)•:
leithen reviewed his, notes.
Fron now on In not going
to reproduce them in
todo but only do certain Itens 1a br.01
for since they are tiredone, repotitious and now largoly proven
to be pross casseratione plus fabrication.
d:
General Notes:
11. Soptenber:
STRY THOV, toile Subject that ho has to drive the
Imbare dor overy Sunday sorning to play Bolt:
Then follow
Subject a account of thn non eristent party
12:8opt:
costIlov comes by at 1143 to offer regrets for not having
come to yesterday's
party and to say that soviet cyollate will
come to roxico for the forthconing wintor olyapics.
Later three
now soviots who don't spesk Spantsh cone fu.
SILNIBOY said that
they vlil Zeave (Moxico) soon.
(COMIENT
probably the two
audio techa.
13 Sopto
Xt J14S STRIZOV and CORONETS CORd In to sAY thet BiLNIROV
had an accident 1n hio caron Marias Nacional that horning
(COMRIT" Accident confined by LIENTOY)
14 sops.
Tho three nor Soviete came in and brought
1os return to this paradise.
Doscription of "stontado" describod abovo.
18 Sopt: Nothing
LOGINDY tella bin that ho la noe Consul in place of YArskov.
Subdoot ho ia 1o0k1es
for s s bedroom house with garden
near the Babasey and not nore than 1, 000 HN per Boath.
subjeet to look for one.
a Septutes c: 15650
P-11712
---
## Page 177
л.
18: 8opts
Subject takes off on bicycle
and finds & boure
at Avenue
180 with
sit bedroons but renting at 5,000.
Subjeet
suspects tha
Lodisoveront 11ko the 3,000 rent nor the laot
Chat there is
" weant lot next door.
19. 302-
LOCINOY comos in at 0930 and Subject describes the bouse
•LoGINOY 111 So by to 100k at it:
T. Spocial Noton On BILNIKOY
10 Bept (Saturday); SILNIKOV la alone. fron 1045 to 1110.
Bays he; STRIZROY and URa COROBETS sill come to party next day
attor sooing MAlTOIN Off at sirport.
(Both LiLYRiC and LIITED
have hin leaving at 1013 in ear and not returning bý, 1400)
81 LNIKOY comes In from 1100 to 1120.
i too lots in rave to leave the party a little carly aince
Bays Soviets 0111: have
they hive to show a fils to the loviet iids in the labissy that.
OventOR ORUSTKIN then comes 1n and gays, can't come. Atch
1128 81LH7ROV COROBITE and STRIZKOY ConG In and all to to party,
9L0.
12 SOptL2020 1O 1040 BILNIKOV, COROBITE and TRIZBOY come 1u
to thank Bubjoct for the party:
1450 SILNIKOV cores. in alone
for a quick tequila. 1510 BILMIROV and STRIZHOY drop by to make
Ball purchasee.
IS Rept 1130 to 2200 SILNI comeS
Te looking for empty
13-Mter Jara. 21510 comes In agains and tells about ilo car
scotdent yesterday.
14 Copt:
to 200 BILlKOY comes ta and explaian the
danage to his car.
1320 to 1635 was In again
16 septS: 1130 to 120S BILNIKOY come 10, 1400 1n agal.
10 Bopt. Hothins.
17 Sopt 1010 BILNIKOY and STRIZHOY cone 1n. 1450 BILAIROY
1n alone
16 Bept: 1100 SILNIKOY and STRIZBOY come 1E: Bublect laviten
then home for lunch,
They can't because STRIZIY had to diive
Ambassador to a conference ith Chilean Asbassador. 1400
BILmInOV in alone.
10 Bept:
SILNIKOY Cones in 3 times: 1100 to 1122; 1430 to 1410;
1830 to 1900 with STRIZIOV to ent tacon.
20 Sept:
1400 SILNIKOV, STRIZHOY and GOROBETS drop In for &
(CONMENT:
AB USUAL LILYRIC and LIMITED do nos support these t1n0s).
Trancis J. COIGHS
BS CRET
---
## Page 178
1d-0n0d
Tho C/O reminded Subj of what he baoienily was In Soriet eyes i an-Sootorn
Lurepour serume did a Sure .
ind more, he had nover professed to then ary dicolosical
smirnety to tho Cromunist enusa. Tho rost he had done maa to declare that the.
Soviets sorresented the mave of the futuro, and he vented to ho on the linino dide.
But hò nuôt recoiro that such sortinent coming fros a Jew could hardly have
convirend the soviets.
b) Next star of arproach to Soviets in Xexicot
Dio C/O quarated to Surd as in effoctly mar to break off from the Sovieta
that he chould too co flotely all arnatime or "criendshare - cut nut tho
"asta la morte". bit.
Subj, In turning down any and el2 Sortet requeste for
Inforiation or antatanor, should couple it with the oren declaration that he hea
quit.
Subj aurord tn coller thia lino, except for the qualification pertaining to
his presence in losers
o) Clarity ntatus of Inginov an "Consul"a
Subj data that during his rcet with Prikhodko and inciner on & Sontecher 1966
while thoy vero talking abont pavel Yatskov, whon trikhrato sata he had acon in
oscon, subj addresacd the folzarine queation to lostnovs men la your boad
conine back?" Lostnow repiteda "You're talkins now to the Consul."
3o Tho C/O miahod to clartly or reaffirmhis understandins of Subj'e responso
to Prikhoiko on 3 Sentenber when
the Soviet asked obout lesalizins a tourlat in
Kerdcod Fororted in mragrarh & of the Contact Roport of 6 Sententer), Prat.
the C/0 paramrared for Subj the vay he had roportod Subjis reasonias proocee
about Brikhodko'a question (son Coment In raragrach 4 of the Contact Peront) -
Subs sold that it mas essentially correot.
Then tho Co folated the war he had reported Prikhoako's question and Suh'a:
"subt sata that that was not exactly how the corversation had taken piece.
He restated the conversation as followss
Pikhodkor minics tial be the best way to legalize (a tourist in l'erico)?
Subject
¿"You know the ansmers."
Prikhotkos "If you wild have to put (a man in your office), would you be sble to?"
Subject "It moula la difficult necessary to consult Cotercacion, because
conrary had to have the required capitalizatio: to place a foreigner
'a from LiC02Y-5 Cried Resort
Ilse inal banne
ang filed: P-2712
---
## Page 179
irtes - 1
.,. .
file
Licalla
SUPPENBRE DE 1966
SPOC LAI
33.
Lato dia e las 1920 He: Xó tranqitaba por la Aranida Unirareidad, Bobre
onta callo y a le altura do Pilaros, ao
ao inauentra un Cats que llova por
nombro: " IPOCAPO", en dicho lugar obsorre que
al intertor so oncontra-
ba LOG platleando con una nuior bon tipo do latina, la pillación
ão 1a.
mujer manolonala, os aproximadamento la alguientes
Bad 20 o 30 añoa, altura 1.5ố n., comploción Icoramonto grudáa, plol
morona, cabello nogro y rizado, cara redonda, ojos darse,
, narla ancha,
boes rogular de labion truesos.
Esta mujar routla de color vardo 8000.
---
## Page 180
CONTACT REPORT
SUBJECT:
DATE OF NESTING:
8
September Ï966
I met with Subject at his office ön 8 September 1966
from 1730 to 1800.
Next meeting is in about two weeks to be
arranged by phone.
reported. that LoINOv still comes fairly.
regularly to the French Club on weekends. Occastonally he brings
hts wife. Once of twice he brought two young soviet men in
thetr early twenties. He has also brought & Soviet woman ca
25 who has played tennis with two other women. (club membere
whom Subject doesn't know. Subject hasn't seen GORLITSYN since
3:
Bince LOGINOY doesn't play tennds but only alta around
outside or in the bar, subject doesn't see hin for sustained:
periods Subject has seen LOGINOV talking to BARMIENTO or his
wite two or three times. From observing bim in the bar,
• Subjeet
saw that LOCINOV 1s on speaking teres with several members.
I asked Subject 1p he knew Ofella ALPARO Lopez (P-11339),
a good friend of the SArMIENTOs and also in contact with the
Soviets.
To didnt recontrother name an a club member rathen
I told him that she teaches at the School of Economics,
remembered that at a dinner party at the home of Henry
*STECHANN,
an American and local head Of Continental 011 Co., a Mexican
woman was present who was a professor of Economics. She: speaks
excellent Engltsh and to In her thirties.
ALFAno but 1s not gured
He thinks this-la
He will check his wife who is the name
renenberer In the family.
367573132
Subject remarked that he found the above dinner strange
for its odd mixture of solid busdaess, types and a few off-beat
Por the next meeting Subject will attempt to confir
ALFARO's identity and also to spot likely club membere who
appear to be in close terms with the SARMIENTOs with the view
of setting an assesament of the latter.
subject is interested and willing.
However, he does
not appear to be very much interested in people.
Thus he baa
played tennis with SARMIENTO for years and hasn't a thing to
say about hin except that. he 19 a pleasant tennis companion.
Similarly SARMIENTO's. wife is good
looking and & good tennis player.
8. I haven't had an opportunity to talk to Subject's wife
yet because Subject says that she does not know the SARMIENTOS.
I met his wife last fall and noted that she is much more alert,
interested
and lively in social relations than he 1s.
Therefore
I bet that she knows a lot more than he gives her credit for.
I Intend to invite them to dinner soon in order to talk with the
wife and explore possibilities.
FILE: P-12330
P-11713
Paul Dillon
p11163 P11339:
P-12703
---
## Page 181
SUIJECTE
Lister.le
Alice.
Contact licyor/ LIC0275 - 2-2.712.
7jept, a fer ainutes;
Sears Ejorolto Noional
a Sent, 11001200, subj'a office
O September 1966
3. On 7. Sept at ábout 1100 the C/O made a routine call to Subj'o orrice to deteruine
If. Suby would be available that day.. Juby responded that he was clad that the c/o
hod called because he had to nog him ursontly. In pharaoteriotió manner Subj trying
doublotalk told the c/o that he had recelved a telegram. that his old friend (irikbors)
was
back, and that he wes coins to see the "two of them" (Prikhodko and logirior) at
2500 that day at the for de Moxloo. The C/Q was mizzled by the reference to the
colesal, and askod incredulously if the
telegram had anythine to do with sottins
up the meeting with his friende.
Subfle anever was ambiguous, and the C/O lot it
8o at that because he arranged a
kriof neet with Subj for 1230 at Seers Restaurant:
st Ejeroito Nacional, whore Subj was to be on his own buginess at that tire.
2.
lovertheless, in considering the briefing instruction to alve to Subj the C/o
hod to alic for the fact that there mlent havo been apecial circuntancos in
the sovlote! arranpetent for their meet with subf. further, thia was Brikhodko!s
firet ucet with Subj after return fron Moscow, where it is presumed he had taken
up Sub'a crue with hs superioro and the line decided on how to deal in the ruture
with their ringing, non-cooperative "acent."
A reasonable ocntisoney expectation
was that the Sovlets nicht have a "hot" proposition to moke to Suble and the c/o
decided to brief. Subj to the ritent that if the Soviets broached a really important
operational assimmont, which Subf was. to judgy, Subj would onduct himalf so as
to draw out the Soviets but stall on acceptance. If nothing of overriding importan
come from tha Soviota, Suby was to continue hio"friende-yes, work-no" atance
At 1230 the C/o say Subj for Juet a few minutes, during whioh the tolostan
was explaineds it mas from Moscon, Inviting Subj'o travel agenoy to pirticipite
In a deminar in Norcon 24-29 Oot 1966, detailed letter to follow. Further, Subj
had leamed from Prikhodko then the latter had called earlier in the noming to
make the appointment for the meet that aftermoon that Brikhoako was avare of the
Invitation and would talk to subj about if at their meet. the c/o imparted to
subs the briefing outlined above, stressing that Subj must Judge whother the
Sovlota were proposing something that was so important that he couldn't dierios
It out of hand - In rhioh case he ves to be non-comittal and stall on a decicion
3o. The Co had communicated to the Station the tack he was going to take, and.
"as later inforned by the Station" to reverse the planning of Subj'e attitude toward
• contingenoy propoaition of the Sovieta to a flat, unconditional "no."
File: re f11702
5-2270 P-855 (pa). P-7447(p2)
ted is simone coo
---
## Page 182
14-00000
2.
Accordin'ly, the C/O tried to reach Subj at hia office. Subj wis not thore
so the 6/0 left a neesaso, to be civen to Suby 1f he should arrive dofore 1500.
Sho sessage vase "En el negoclo con sus alg08 deberte uated deolr "no! a todo i
The messase rurported to one fron "Seler Bergor." "
In i telephone call to sulf at 1600 that ovening the C/o lonrned Aron Subig.
that nothing of trangeending importance had occurred at hie neet with the Sortete,
and so tho c/o arranged to meet with Subf the following day B September once mee
4o. On a Sept Subj renorted that he had set Pikhodko and lostnov at 1500 the
. receding day in the Flor de Nexico Restaurant, Pikhodko did most of the talling.
Ho brought Subj the two kilos of cavier that Subf had requested (and paid for).
and with the Miniatry of forelin Affairs) who sent hio reparda to Subj and aloo, rout
Fussion recorde.. He had scen Pavel Yatakoy In Moscow who told him that he had not
•Subj in Paris, Yatskov would be retumins to Moxico about 17 Septemher 1966. sisher
Prikaddko of Lasinoy toid Subf that Lostror was now the Soviot Consul in Mexioo.
liginoy told Subj that he would pans by Subl'g offioe on Monday (12 Sept) -
Thoy discissed the invitation to the travel afonta to come to Moicon. Trikhodko.
bald that twelve TUTiRIST representatives in hextoo had been Invited, that ho had
the toleram and that ho was going to coordinate the arrandomenta for the travel
agente to artend the conference, /Comante The telegram sent to Subj in Spondeh on
6 September 1966 snide "there will be a conference 24- 29 Dotober In Moscow of
travel agencies that collaborate with nrast dealing with international trurtar;
ve Invite your aceneri a reduced metce for the stay will be afforded a detailed
Lottor follorse"/ Pikhodko asted Subd if he thought of attending the onference,
Suby nata ho would like to 80 (and added "ith a twinklo) "only from à huainese
sturdroint."
Irikhodko, for his part, in thin reference to Subj's uncooperative itti tule
7sald that Subjhad put ble into a hard spot with hia auperdors in Mogcon. And now.
no would have to consult with Moscon to see whether Suby can attend the travel acent
conference.
Subj asked archly "Hy letter?" Prikhodko replied "You're crazy?
overy thing goes by cable." Subf stated "You
cen refuse me a vloa." Prikhoako
dismosed that, saying that it Subj soos to Moscow he will he meet Prikrodko'a
collearuos, and that if Subj is in hosce the doctors there would be happy to
chook into Subj's health (a matter menticned previoualy with both Loginow and
Prikhodko)e: Subj, responding sonewhat sockingly to thia expression of concerta
by the Soviets, said he was etill their friend"and one of them.
---
## Page 183
30
Mikiniso then remarked sonothine to tho offect that subj now dida & vant
to do anything for thon what with his bad health and being tied up in miness
-but that rayho la tho future..es and then got very much into the present ey
a11dtnr canilo into tho old crooves he gaid
"I talked/you several times sout
a man coming touriat to laxtoo - what 1o the beat was to arrange legal muldence
could 1t he done throuch jour offloo - ho could be attached to your office he
docan't have to work there
/Commente Subs explatned to the C/o that ho sensod tho trap immediately, recosniains
that this was the old bent of the Soviets on which he had furiahed a wealth of
Information in the past. Suby reasoned that if the Soviete were fishing with the
old bait, he would not flae to 1t ensorly because in view of his recent noos
cooperative behavior it would only confirn to the Soviets that he was bejas
controlled (by the MIS) Me would not reject the inainuation of hio cooperation
out of hand and categorically, because that rould not be conglotent with bis pasture
ôf ronatning on crendly toruo vith the Sovieta. Merofore he took the middle road,
that of being non-comittal or unoonitted, where the initiative of connliancé was
always in hia hands
Parinthetically, Suby told the c/o that if the policy is
that of complete rajortion of the Sovieta he should not have even set them; but
following the policy of "hanta la morte- amos, pero hacer nada" he felt de vas
doing the richt thing In stringing them along a barren path. Thus, without batting
in eye he simply repeated what he had already told thom./ Subf satd he would have
to confult Goboracin bocause he didn't know lf his company had the muuired
capitalization to placo à foreimer in a Job - but thie being l'exico, arrains could
probably bo dong. /Commonts Subj remarked to the C/O at this point that she Soviete
could not seriougly connider uning Subj'o Cira to "lecalito" their son, because.
It rould be a patont fraud to the omployeen in hia lew, and he dia not think the
Soviets vere stupid about such thing.
The C/o's surmary comment to Subj'e unspoken plea for critiotsn or his ccurse
of action was that under the concopt of a "friends, yest work, no" policy terard:
the soviets he was doine e fine fob of walking the tightrope.
The C/o asked Subj If there had boon any travel arrangements for nor sortets
to
the Soviet Union.
Suny replied that Jullo Rothengtreich, whom Subj cheracterized
as a Germen Jen, and his nife, a Russian Jew, had Jeft 5 Sept to New York en risto
to the Soviet Union.
Subj eald Rothenstretch had told him that he was triestraith
the Soviet Ambassador in Mexieo and represented "Pussian firing" (810).
Ea tas to
reriain in the Soviet Union-15 daya and visit a few cities, Rescon, Kiev and fulfid
and then sone cities in Europe, Vienna and Paris! Jubf said that Rothenstrich's
---
## Page 184
11.00000
own fira was baking tho hotol reservations in the Soviet Union for hia. Subg'sald
ho had net onco hefore with Rothenstreich years noo, but didn't know anything about
Subs aldo rentired a midonor in hia mistleo, David Nosofaky, who loft for
the sovlot Union or 1 Sape - josufany lau a brother In Mei.
the c/o had noticed a now face among subj's employees and aaked Subd who the
Stri was.
Subf explained that he had taken on the new fart,
the
daustitor it one of subja quidas in loxtoo, as possible replacorient for
who hau an offer to work for the Israell Subsy In lexioo. Subf sadd
Tie would not want to love
_becauge, even though she le a elon worker, she 1s
conable and aldo a nice Girl TEL
pould Leave.
would take over
her work. (which includes the responsibility for non Soviet travel to the Soviet Union)e
To The c/o questined Subj about hie attitude toard, atterding the travel dent
conforence in l'oscow. Subj sald that from a business otandoint he would wont to
attend, or 1f not hin perschally sonore frontlo Mom, Like Miriam. Me mao
Intorested in InTuiSt buainoss, and folt that he should know what plans INTURIST
1ll be formulatine inesnuch an his competitore will be there.
Ho is interested
to know what percentage ho dote of riturist buginess.. Ho bolieved that INtISt.
would foot 50g of the costs of staying in the Soviet Union during the conference.
The c/o askod if Suby knew the other travol asncies that were to be invited.. Of the
trelve from Merloo Subj folt that the following were ineluded Carze, Carza Tours,
Da Carlo Trura, Mojoa dollo, Cook'o, NexAmerica, Pegaso, Excuratones y Viajeo (SVISA)!
American Exrress, and poesibly Autoriajen Intornacionales.. Subj krien the "jefea" of
all these.
Suby plana to attend the
International Congress and Convention Assootation
woatine in Isracl on 30 detober 1966. He la considering the poraibility of going
to locoy for the travel afont meeting 24-29 Oot and then doing on to Israel.
The C/0 told Subj to let him know Prikhodko's resulta re perilsaton for subj
to attend the hosoon moating.
8.: Subj requested the C/O to obtaln one cace each as Red, inite and Rouse Frenoi
vine, the Most" avatladles
CARDIO
so on to?
---
## Page 185
14-000n
8
.T.
MKHORANDUN FOR THE RECORD:
SUBJECT:
ircozY-s Meeting vith PRIKHODKO and LoCINoV
on? September 1966
LICOZY"S reported that he had a meetins with
PRIKHODKO and LOGINOV at 1500 on Y Septembor at a Restaurant
in town.
2. LILYIC reports that on y September LOGINY left the
Embassy alone' in his ow car at 1403 going north on Tacubaya.
PRIKHODED left alone on
foot to the east at 1416.
returned together in LOGINOV'a car at 1730.
Thus LOGINOY picted up PRIKHODKO somewhere and took
hin to the LICOZY 3 weating Thia. is not. only a good anti:
aurvelllance device but also helps to prevent us associating
the tựo:
Paul Dillon
TILS:
P 27127
P- 2270
P-11718
---
## Page 186
-00c0s
files
alentin V. langiino
Terno "orindesin da les Felejades de la 1. 1. 111. 51.
Cruela Cipo Cope
Coinchein
P-1712
Separ. 6,1946.
---
## Page 187
31.22:30: 1266
1=ac
in Paráco
70
Cleo
,?:
took. curi
-mored to "takos that Guly had arrived
id they he, a short sal; about diecancopertial
that ratchoy mould be returnirrito Mrico.
Pacheco
dorantise 1.d0rt 1000 toxico/Ere Sue Mir
Estoradio
ta dent
40-00i
cause coof told bie to and do me fami
-8767
miles
-585
21221
GU.
Prévidariti
seen
and. erotiti
of nore.
travel;
ho
2L:
"...
agree
-bă
Solen
orino? had autra nt soro
ra ranketch de sung's. office, id asked sung if thero had
1o1 tar Soviots an his carloyees, Sukg said he knew
Gic accented the ho already nees that Armicing handled Soviet
31.
nandios misoriod travot to tho Sovict Union -rint asked
mis
(otos Subj. baa a f47r on Canuclas,
.13
da not unt at that tize to enla dog Ornucla's
cucationo rearacting both coplarcos, and said re pould
as a luton deto - ervero es ronson triat no mantid dala
Lone but the Sovieta.) me facts anchord on bach
ro rera:
com did shout 5 yeare, Suba acquired Pette rod arother
one creatont in tarleso. subd curld homo bit mered.
was "Cott and other diees "Do the ridit."
"isn'
3.
is
nories, Cathy brom data, Chised Martas had merced for
0ssr:le5.11
t.:o
¿one Farla Dude, detor chich she santica lot digos to Subje
tiat
Varia is me Jantat a mirdod, and iriterson interestos in
10
rie:
ais
8/0
munirded
jubs tie do is contactod to the dorioss he mintains
mis none?:
stance
rit: then.
Subs sodded a rockent
22: 1-2712.
117,
---
## Page 188
SECRET
Concerning the big inj, 21 Aufust, Subjoet had tho
follorina to say in ridition to the irforration in
his notes.
This AriOratiC" los 12, 205p0.s0 to my questions :
2. They loft the stoic at ca 1110 and stopped off to got:
sarbecued chicken (Coilinit:
clicy didn't actually airive at LICOll's
until 1507.!
b.
They wont ti a blue Station vagon (COSENT: this
is 1? DA):
The Soriots léit at ca 1800 (COMMENT: correct)
scsices riCon and his wife and the two Soviets,
only LICORL's daughtor and son-in-law were present.
Later on in the rocting Subject volunteered the
infonation that StilliV has coid him that ho had obtained
painission to:cord to bicor's hore (cornrit: Strange conduct
for soncore tir a playing
the port.of a case
ficer.)
a1s0 volunta
he lad told SILNIKOV ti
LOGINOV had: called
a girl fro. iro
Saturday (See Subject
Is notes for 20
August. CLIKOV'S
lcaction was one. of approval
• Toting thật
LOGISON
wES
ingcholor now.
I asked Subjcet. Il he didn't think
his seaterert
abit
indiscreot since he could have burned
, espocially since SILNIKOV' has now shown an intcrest
in socurity norsures.
He said I was right but it was obvious
that his ispot cidn't bother him in the least either before or
after my question.
T.: I astcd Subject what lo trought about SILNIKOV's crratic
banavior accut vantans ronen, pornographic matcrial, etc. in
that
he raiso's and cross
the subicct without any sense. of continuity.
Subject answered this by proposing that ve send a
girl under our
corrol to vost iis score and he would introduce her to
SIL KOY 100%
wactly wat we are trying to do with Linustic-li
I pointed out thrt such a girl" rould have to live in the neighbor-
hood or hor szosence in the store vould be suspect.
He then said
that tho firl: could bo invitce to his home at a time when r
SILVIKOV Tas trores Subject would introduce her as a friend
frog Jalisco and lot nature tale its course.
I told him that his
idea has basic recit but could be quite disficult to implement
in a'securó
I roharked that it was a shame that he.had
been unable
He said chess soco we wich
suitable candidates in his neighborhood.
bat
10Л!
surable friends in
the neighborhood
chat norc
nuitable
since they weren't the types to
thon te could
custest such an
but re could:,
idea.
I told him that he
couldn't
no would spot suitable candidates.
Licoul Contact Repart
23 August 1966
---
## Page 189
and
that his
"mayoo" was juat a uny of loaning
Loptnor.
sudy thon araorted to
the C/0 that he felt strong in his capaclty to deal with the sandeto, and that
his joking remaris ln noo uay vitlated that strengen..
The co brought up the matter of subja hung told /toginoo
his personal documents to loginov, and (solely with the deston of reaching for
subj's motivel stated that we thought it would be betterly suby did nothing
to pass these ducurants to une soviots and hold them off indefinitely:
apreäred a dlt chagrined. at the C/O's request, and told the C/O uhy:
-ha.
manted to glue those mastards" his documents to show them he had nothing to
Alde, and that he was not afraid of them; uf he didn't give over his documenta
they right thinh they had sometring on him. furtror he: felt that le uag buying
Insurance by handing them over openly, and gave as on example that he might be
flying in Europe and might find himself dlverted or force-landed ln'a place
like praque or Narsaw.- and it would be a comfort to him to know that he fithing
to be afrald of concerning any trregularittes in his pasts
merefore, subf asked the C/o to chech ülth his "bogges" to see if re could
the go chead on handing over his documents: subf sald ly the answer le no!
he ulll comply, but his pleading to the C/O appeared as of subj thought hla mas
the ulger course:
/comment: Desplte the C/Org matrod of challenging subf on
spectfics; like the "maybe" and the passing of the documents, the c/org ow
opinion 19
that subj has achloved a very satisfactory status in his dealings
wth the Sbutate,
satlofactory In the sense that it is in accord with the
station's objectives in the case and equally important that it can be maintained
Decause li lạ
conslatent ulth subj's parsonality and outlook
7...
subj expressed a desire for another get-together with the C/O and his wife.
The C/0 explained
that. his.ulfe
would do leaving dexico by mid-tomary - and
SiDl, who doesn't need
any pictures to be draun for him, Immedtately hazarded
the opinion that that meant that the C/O would be leaving nat too long after.
The C/O acknowledged this possibillty, but said he had ro idea of when it would
take place.
suby wanted to know if there would de someone to take the C/O'a
place when the tima came, and the C/O anowered that of course there would.
The
time for the get-together is leff for some indefinite date before the
c/or nife departe
PPAU
COPIES MADE
---
## Page 190
1d-in thon
SECRET
14 inconver 1005
MMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT:
Carlos BLANCO Solano (P-9328).
SOURCE:
LITEPO-19.
to cod a is pater four report to bet shed anyon
requirement:
"Carlos BLANCO worke in the judicial police as a
confident of Carlos. CASAMADRID (P»10968) :
•Barlier he' vorked 1n
the DPS and later worked with Carlos MADRAZO (P-3193) in tbe
pRI.
When MADRAZO left the PRI BLANCO continued as his aide. Inter
he went to work with CASAMADRID..
nett alone but was annised to the socialecenter,
In the: D'S he never porked on
foregnore. I met his last Saturdar:
(COMMENT:
evidentally 1a responao to our requirement, which source
received on 9 December). He sald that he tea friend of
(Vindinir) LOGINOV of the soviet embassy and he had one of
LOQINOV's carde.
Attached 1e BLANCO's
card.
I will subalt s
photo inter.
CASAMADRID's office number 1f 10 93-98.
A ..
Br. BANTOS of the Amerioan Embassy. "
Source mubmitted BLANCO'e car:
the back is eritten
Atenor Sale # 110-%, Col.
Naryate (BLANCO's home address) and
the telophone numbera 10-33-62 (CASAMADRIDe offico) and
28-5740 to leave messages) "
Evidently, BLANCO does not have
a home phone.
The street, Atonor sale de not in the 1965 plan of the
Federal Distriot.
TILE:
p:9328
болта)
Paul Dillon
"Pw8Ÿ56
P-5193 P-10968
SECRET
---
## Page 191
1d-0d0d
Alton
SeTT
White o
Alice.
19 Dacember 1906
STEECT:
coritact sapors/ IIC02Y5+ f-7712
.13 Dec 1930-2000, Hotel Rafornia
The C/0 arranged to dellvar some liquor to subj at the time he was rosting
an Alr France cocktall. at the Hotel Pajorma. After. the liquor vas tranuferred
to subj's car in à neardy. parking lot, suby recounted to thec/o the story of a
oisit he had had from Valast log inou that day.
2.
subf reported thet,
Loginoo come to his office unannounced and provalled on
subj to step down
to
the
street to have a coffee witr rim.
Loginod presented
suby with four bottles of voake for Christmes, and then started to oat subs
some personal questions
1) Mou had subj left Polond (after wit) for farls- had lils documentation
been legal or filegal.
subj answered that it was legal.
2)
•How was he able to enter faris- did he have a valla French ulso.
said he did.
How long ald he stay in faris.
• subj said. a few months.
- 3) Bus he released from service with the (Polesh) UB?
sibj.sald.y0g.- Moro.
there any conditions to this releass. subj sald no.
Hard was he supposad to
de contacted by the foles.
suby said yes; and related the story of how he uno
contacted in Mexico (in Aarch 1955) by a Folläh diplomatic courler
who brought.
a latter from subj's old boss in the UB, Stanchuk (phonetic), and how subj
answered that letter.. /Comment:. Believe the story given in
some detail tr
debriefing of suby on his experiences in. UB and waII.
Loginou wanted to krow
11. subj'3. response to Poles had been, positive or neyative.
subj sald it had
been nautral.
Asked-why, subf replied that he belteved that eighty parcent
of the foles were ariti soviet.
Loginow said. "You are right."
4) :Loginov asked subj how he was getting along witr tre Amerloan alrlineg
he deals with. suby sald "fine", and asked why.
Logtrov sald that mybe, if
sub'j has the chance, he can learn the name of " the airector of the CIA in
Mexico".
subj told loginow he was crazy, or couldn't be serlous; he. couldn't
get that information loginov asked subj if he could, would he tell the
Solets.
suby gaid to Loginou that he would show loginov the documents that bach
up his answers to loginous questions, but thet he was busy through Christmas,
but could possibly see him after Christmas and before New Years.
?. The C/o asked sucy he had Inquired of logtnow why the latter was asking
such question.
sudy sald. he did not, even though he mas complately purried
by this tach on
the port of the soulets.
But sub" felt perfectly at ease in
telling. the truth to the sbolets, and had no hesitation in showing them his
documentatton
The C/o told suoy that we would discuss this matter firther
at leelisy
File
CC.
P-11712
PRI
COPIES MADE
---
## Page 192
14-00000
SECRET
CONTACT REPORT
SUBJECT:
DATE OP MEETING:
LICOUL
13 Decouber 1066
and Melchor Ocampo
lastod untll: 1515.
Christass bonun: for 1966. Next meeting
te for Tuesday, 3 January
1967 at 1500 at the same place.
subjeet started out by showing me A ploces of paper he
had picked up near the incinerator.
They wore worthless and I
later told hin not to attompt to pick up any more paper aince it
is not worth the risk.
I then roviewed the SGSWIri examination with him;
I-told
him that because of his lies and esasterations, none of his peevioud
Information us considered valid and that rather than "being sore
useful tous" his material had meant a lot of nork for nothing. I
told him that. I would give him another chance and that we sere
starting a new operation.
Throughout uy talk he was quite un
comfortable. He did not try to defond hingelf but simply agreed
to whatever I said.
Although he thanked ne for the second chance
he did not appear to be too 'contrite.
4. Following are the few interesting itens fron hid potes
On 12 December at ca 1700 KORMUSHKIN came in with another
Soviet. KORWUSHKIN asked Subject when ho was going to invite bin
to his home for a drink. Subject suggested Sunday, 18 Decenber
They agreed to meet at the store at 1500. Subject described the
other Soviet an a young diplount ca 29 30 with i thin build gho
comes in only soldom.
He was a friend of Oleg NECHIPORKNIO (vis
already here when NECHIPORENKO Vas here) and vent to the flesta
at subject's home watch was attended by NECRIPORANKO and KOSTIKOY
and wives
"OINT: I remember a report on this flesta but can't
find it amyhero). Subject asked no for instructions, dinner, girla.
ete?
"told him to to along with it have then to bie house without
other quests and offer thon only liquor and snacks. Subject is
to doternine HORNUSHKIN's motive in asking hinself to Subject's:
hant so song he he ray Set hit red london very Bette
On 6. December LOGINOV camo ta from 1230 to 1242.
had previously asked Subject about helping the Soviets to find a
house for thelr school. This time he asked about the now (LILYRIC)
building - how much an apartment costs (1500 MN), who lives there
(chemical engineer In penthouse (LILTRIC), & Gorman fanily on the
second floor, etc.
LOGINOV's questions vere general and so vere
Subject's answers.
On Saturday 3 December 1966 SILNIKOV came in from 1412
He asked for tuo receipts of ca 3 IN each for bread, saying
that he had lost the real ones.
notect uninks no uses these sna.
Bums to buy beer and girlie magarines.
TINTY then leated throu
a girlie sagazine and then said he vants Subject to find his a girl
for whose favore ho is willing to pay 100 MN.
(COMMENT: chiseling
10 MN In. false receipts and in the next breath offering 100 uN
for & girl?)
FILE:
P-8764
$ 11707
po 11712
p-6414
---
## Page 193
Concorning the tolephone call of 8 Decenher 1960 from
Carlos BLANCO to Valentin B, LOOTV at the Sovlet Babassy 1n
whIch BLANCO told LoCiOV that "*i' conndanto Carlos" (Carlos
CABARADRID Mirando vanted to see Pavel A" YATSKOV.on an urgent
matter, the folloving infomation may pertain to this
diécussion
on 11 october 1863 at 2200 hours Pavol
A, YATSHOV
as soon'having dinner vith an untdentified Mexican sale at the
"Lo Tablita" Bostaurant on the corner of Sjercito Racional and
Gutenborg:
At tho
end of thetr peal the Poxican pushed a sail
objoct seross the table towirda YATSKOY. YATBROY Covered thie
objeat with his napkin and then put the objoct in his pocket.
It cas obvious that this object was passed in a clandestino
They, thon left the restaurant. logothor and separated.
Tbo Moxican thon rent to a joop with Dr liconso 11-63 (1964 1965
tenue) and drove off. alono.
This jeep had n seal reading
"Procuradurla' Conoral de Justiola del Diotrito y Torritorios
Pederalos - Pollela Judicial'"
Thus, 1t cas be assured that
tho porcon la-as exployee of the Judictal Police,
The undentified Maxican malo ma described sa about
35 gor old about 170 es tall, 70 kilos In wolght, slight
ië is noted that both Carlos CABAMADRID and Carlos
BLANCo are slater in apparace to the above described porson:
Carton CABANADRID. Miranda called Oleg M. WICHIFORKNKO
at the soviet Fabany on 10 March 2863 and on 16 Marce 1965.
On 10 March 1965 CABANAriD called to confira dinner with:
PORn the can day On to March 1005 WICHI POREO
vee not 1n.
Carlos BlANCO Called Valentin &. LOGINOV on 1 November
1065 and 10 Novenber 1086.
"" addition Graciela soto (a Priond
'OS BLANCORS) Called LOGINOV on behal? of BLABCO on 3 Soptenber
1960 and 0 Novonber 1000.
AtT of the above calls vore to arrante
• social notings botroen BLANCO and LoGInOY.
All of the above inned Solete are KGb officor
LOGINDY took the place of NECHIPORENKO when MICHI PORERIO 102t
Mexico. LOGINOY arrived in Mexico on 3 August 1905.
According
to the colephone convorsation he was already a good friond of
BLANCO"s on 1 Noveabor 1965. Thus It would appear that LoOKoV
VILE: F885 P7412 P10968
P11712 P-3694 p-9328
Dis: firama (Madonnoy), 5 Dec966
---
## Page 194
VAN PUE SORO COntACT EACh BLATCO bY aRothor BovIot, probably
NECHI PORENSO OF YATSLOY.
It is interesting to note that,although
CASANADBID Ban boon ta contact vito NECHIPORENKO and BLANCO hAn
been ta contact vith looty,
; thoro: 1e so pervious: indication
that either nee YATSOV, YATSOV la the kch onlo! of both.
-B. Attached ta a COpy Of a memorandu conceralag LOOINDY.
---
## Page 195
14-00000
1.
In July
1966 whon you and Gorty Wit Slacissiar Carlos
CABANADRID
bs a possiblo choico for tho porson to ind a
nooting with Pavol YATSHOV nt "La Tablita" rostrurant
in Ootobor
1903, you told Goorco that CASAMADRID'E
naplotent
man of confidence;
NU, fittod the doscription of tie porcon even
better than CASAMADRID did.
•*.: What :1e the name of tale porson und his official titlo?
Be what are his business and hone addrosson and tolophones?
o.; Can you provide us with a photo of htm...
d. Can you sivo un a rosuno of his profossional rareor and en
evaluation of him as a porson?
Do you know &
An ta pereas above.
CRU SLANCO WhO WOrka Math CASALDRED. DotailE
Des
quis Pitemptir (9 De21965)
c0 50-6-91/4
CC: Carls BLANCO CP- 9328
Parce YATS RON CP- 873
LOGUINOR CP- 11712
---
## Page 196
4.0=8e.!
El Cónsul de Monaco Ofrecio una Recepción
•LUOMELA VASILIEVA, Galia Soloviena: Kienia
Barretel, consul.de
Молясь у?
kina y Galina.
Valentina S. Loguinov.y
señor
schora. esposa. frole
Garza Noble)
En la residencia del cinsul
Barele: Finge fune, & deli.
Cionzalez. Pariode
s; sonnra,
da: URSS. el. setior Ahelard
ip Monano.
"en las Lomas;de,
Chamiltepri.
se. ofrpio
crusce pocacillee Puergn. sel;=
don this de
Curhelo,
'los"- corisules:
de.
grané e lae muchiginvirados
sennia. "Gristain
Cognio
Francia. Sillza, Erador, Es
dictel para.rlehrar.o. hesta:
Fontio, inej asistentes
se fi.
Thiecas don Agustin Salvat
sados linidna, Grecia.
Hattl
nacinnial.
Centil anfitrione;
contrahan Alleran de Rasenz.
tue là discinguida senoia de
si erg
Diaz' g señors.
' Carlos
schole. les entaladcies de
Islandia, Marmeros.
Nicaia:
Francia, Grecia, Haiti, Hoian-
SIGLE EN LA FAGIA DUS
Ex celsior
22
Wor 66
11?17
---
## Page 197
-00000
BECRET
CONTACT REPORT
SUBJECT:
DATE OF MEETING:
21 November 1968
picked Subject up at the corner of Nilo and Melchor
Ocampo
at 1100 ön 21 November 196G.
The mocting was hold in my
car
on a side strict and lasted: 50 minutos.
paid subjcot 900 MN;
his salary for November 1966.
Next meeting is for 1100 on
December at the above place. Subject will be given an SGSWIRL
examination at this meeting.
Subject
didn't have a word to say about LOGINOV's attempt
to
recruit him.
When I asked about it,
he said he thinks that
LOGINOV
is out of town since he hasn't scen. LOGINOV since. his
Jast mecting. with me.
His "notes for 17 November say that at
1210 Yurly. (ISAYEV) camc in with another "diplomat" and both
bought cigarcttes:
ISAYEV told Subject (apparently out of the
blục) that LOGINOV had been very busy and
therefore hadn't been
able. to
sce subject
ISAYEV then added Subject shouldn't forget
about what LOGINOY had asked him.: Subject answered that he didn't
ISAYEV simply
Good, he will come to see you)
would be di-cussing LOGINOV's business with him.
• Subject had no
that they are
connected professionally
1-11712
---
## Page 198
CONTACT REPORT
SUBJECT:
DATE IS MEETING:
LICORI -1
10 November 1966
I picked Subject up on the corner of Nazas and Melchor
Ocampo at 1100
10 Noverber.
The meeting was held in my
car did lasted
an hour.
Next meeting is for 21 November at 1100.
2.
subject started things out by saving that LOGINOy 18
tryin.
to rocruit him to report on LIE:PTY-6..
Roview of his notes
and d' scussion
revealed the
following:. On 5 November LOGINOV
cano
.
Subject told him he had found a house on Juanacatlan.
LOGINEV
said
that he's looking for oncön the Chapultapec Park
•Sie
^& Talz. Tacubayz and
for. Subject to keep looking.
V. said.
that he rould
like to rent an apartment at P.A.
de
Santos
104-
Subject told him they arc all occupied.
LOGINUV said Subject must know those apartments well.
admitted
that he did and besan to sketch them buTLOGINOV
didn°t seem
to be interested in his efforts.' LOGINOV then asked.
how many apartments there were in the building.
16.
Subject answered,
LOGINOV then
said that since Subject knows the apartments
so well he must also know the people who live there.
Subject
admitted that
he did.
At this point some other Soviets came in
and the conversation ras torminated.
On 6 November LOGINOV
dropped by for some small talkand left some Soviet chocolate
(which Subject showed ne) for Subject's grandchild. On 9 November
LOGINOV, came in at 1230 and asked. Subject to go to a restaurant:
with him:
Subject countered by saying his wife was home sick
and he had no one to leave the store with. Subject then invited
LOGINOV to his house
but LOGINOV insisted on a restaurant.
Subject agréed to go on 12 or 13 November.
•From the above Subject concludes that LOGINOY wants to
recruit him to report. on LIENPTY-6 (whó lives in P.A. de los
Santos
I asked why LOGINOV would be interested in LIENPTY 6
(there is nothing about him in
the notes).
Subject answered.
that hẹ finds LIENPTY-6.
very suspicious because in
the 5 years
that he
has known him, Subject doesn't know what he does
lIving.
He thinks he
writes novels.
In any case he is home
all day long.
In additión, he lies.
He told Subject
the new (LILYRIC) building.
He is also eccentric.
Besides his windows face
17.
on the Embassy.
The apartment directly
below his, number 13, (probably
LILYRIC) 1s empty.
the owner having LOGINOV
in mind.
owner said
that the apartment had been rented by
LI EMPTY-6 which Subject also finds surprising.
The whole theme
was that he is suspicious of LIElPTY6 and that LOGINOV wants
to recruit him to
All of the above
on LIEWPTY-6
and his apartment was verbal. There was
not a word about hin
In his notes.
I told Subject that. 11 LOGINOV tries to recruit him 10r
any purpose, he is
to
cut hin short and to
indignantly refuse.
He 1s:8150
to tOll LOGINUY that SILNIKOV had tried the sano thing
two months ago.
P-11'112
---
## Page 199
1d-0d0
LICOTLl Contaet Report
1 November 1008
He 1e 38-30 years old, married and has worked for
Nicolas for 2 or 3. joars.
(COMMENT:
Colonta Pensil Is in the
western part of Tacuba and is full of lagos, but nothing
anywboro near Lago Cont):: I told Subject to go abend and Ket
no the information on Nicolas INU anyway, His notes on this
are in the entry.
loi 26 october.
:5.
With thia SubJect ran out
of volunteored information and
attacked his notos which contained the following tea
worthy of note :
. ..
On li October LOGINOV eine in and asked Subject
to koep looking for a houge. near the Embassy..
He said they
want it for a school to which the children can walk since
driving then back and forth to the present sebool in proving
cumberione. He nieo sursented that Subject sign the rental
contract since many people are unwilling to rent to Sovlets.
When I expressed surprise about Subject signing a contraot for
5,000 pesos a month he said that ho had done it bofore for a
Soviet Colonel in 1953 (the year Stalin died)
This bouse was
at Chicontepec 70 and sented for 4,000 pesos.
(COMENT; That
subject could sign a contract for 5,000 posos a month is
ridioulous. That the soviets, are lookins for a not bobool
Just altor novtng tnto the m one 1s strango):
PI1112
---
## Page 200
14-000
• .
usual effervescent self, asked Immediatoly If I had
gotten the capers ho left for me, sinted that he had
decided to go to Moscow, rattled off his schedule, gave
Le the names of the only other two travel agents be
new were going, repeated several times he'd be happy
TIDE CARDED
to give me a report when ne returned, and asked, as 1f..
he hoped I didn't, it there was anything I wanted to
tell him before he left. I got the floor about this
time. and proceeded to backtrack over some of the ground
just covored. As for his schedule and itinerary, ho
plans to leave for Moscow on 23 October via Air Franco,
stopping over briefly in Paris; to make a sido trip to
Aser on 27. and 28 October; and to leave Moscow fon
Paris via Air France on 70 October. He will fly from
COPIES MADE
Paris. to Genoa for a day on travel business and then
return to Mexico from Paris on Air Franco via Now York,
where ho plans to pick up a couple of suits and tako in
"Supernan" on Broadway. He will arrive back In Mexico
on 3 autobury November.
3. Subject said that in addition to the other
three agents whom he had mentioned last time as having
been invited to the Intourist Conference-loises SCHUSTER
of Mundos Tours, Carlos ISIRGUEN of De Carlo Tours, and
Edmundo
GARZA ofGarza Travel Servico--he had. learned that
'ISaiC BULEVSKY of Jet Travel Agency had also received.
an invitation.
Besides hinself, however, only ScHuStER
ory filid
P- 8415
and BULAFVSKY are solnig, the other two having decided
againstithe trip. for unknoin reasons.
Subject mentioned.
that SCHUSTER 13 going to take his son, who is in hie
early teons.
I asked Subject 1f he had been in touch with
anyone at the Soviet Enbassy about the trip or 1f anyone
there seemed to be resconsible for lining up participants
1800666
---
## Page 201
sor or to have any special interess in the conference.
Subject replied that ho had been at the Sovlet Embassy
about the middle of September on risa business and had
seen the Soviet he always dealsinità on visa matters,
but that this Indivldual seened surprised to hear Subject
had been
Invited to Moscon and claimed to know nothing.
or at least none of the details--about the Intoruist
Conference.
Subject claimed not to be able to remember
the Soviet's name, hunted around in his wallet unsue
cessfully for the Soviet's card, and then antd, well,
in- any case it was the individual he had mentioned
last time as having just gotten a promation to Consul..
I fInally asked him 1f he meant foGINOV whose name he
had given me last timer-and after thipking for a moment,
he rolled that yes, that sounded righty I then asked
him If LOGINOV had shown any more Interest in hir or
In any way been more friendly toward him in the last
COPIES
couple of months or since he bad recelved the Intourist
Invite.
Subject roplied that he had hot.
Subject seemed a little sensitive to this
question, and I stated that I was sure he understood:
why I was asking, since I lonew he had been thoroughly
briefed by one of my predecessors prior to his 1963
trip to the Soviet Union on Soviet Interest In visitors
to the USSR. I explained that se had no intention to
ask him to
do what he had agreed to do on his last
trip to
the USSR (accept recruitrent if offered. and
Oreg feled
1-8415
that we did not want to burden him with any instructions
on how to behave or respond while there, However, I
said, we continued to feel he las of potential Irterest
to the Soviets and wanted to rake sure he was atsre of
this when he kent over, had a beslthy respect for the
leverago the Soviets have
on thels hore ground, and
LIGANN -1 Contact 70,7016
18006606
---
## Page 202
CARDED 3
11 October 1966
COPIES MADE
14 lies 1000a1245, Jubj's offle
1o
a tron hat dropped hy the orfice durine the
mook
and ment to have coffer miti jubli
Juby remareed that lordnow doodn't seen to rant
to talk in the orsico), Lo iron had brounht olene visa application fora for subs,
and Subs filled thea out for hirgelf and his son, larcod, and turned them suer to
Loginor alony with tho pasoporta (attached are ooplos of the visas- notor the viada
are good for over 20 daja in the Soviet Union, altlouch the INTUPIST conference 1o.
Sron 24 Vot to 29 Octdo
Loginor told Suby that Pavel Yatalov, wantod to seo him (prreumenly Yatnkov
has broucht sonathing back for Subj). Subj asked Losinov what Yatskor 1o doing.
The soviet replted that Yatskow has a Job in tho Embassy. Subd proaned, "hat kind
maid
of a Job. It's worthrhilo that you gave hin a dood job." Loginor ropliede "You
6-7442
want to inow too mich."
2°
The C/d asked Sung what deodded him to 50 to the Soviet Unton.. Subj replied
that he had a cornionion fron the Petroleum Congrong (Subj is involved in orminizing
the Congrcas for liceico for 2 to l April 1967), aotually in bohalf if Kli! and hia
own intoreats,, to pérnuado the Sovieta that they use done
other nirline then
Aeroflot to traranort the Soviet delerates to lesdco. /Comments the c/0 3u» a
barnts
thist attäe
confideditinl Irtter from Kuli which set out the probabllity that the Sovicts would
want to use deroflot but that thoy had not committed themaives an yet ne to
number of delcated thnt would attend or the means by which they would trinatort
deletes atenched so a copy of a letter to Dr. Mos. anotkin arrointine Sung
in his visit to loacon to talk to Dr. Neretkin- the let-er sinter that ther
future wait or subj la excluelvely connected to assist the Nationsi comition"
chuch la ratestly not the care since suby ta attendine the brior con rener/
At any rate suhf has decided to go to losco?, ird ia
taking, is one son'
Subj repeaten iun lectie in oscon as fer as contreta nith the seviet are ancerned.
lie will not rog lim out, not even lechiporenko, and if contacted a tire l will
be affable md ionedittal, and not put the sharp inque te hen thet he i, rouch.
He said the lactor remains his rovition in lexico, or anywhere else tut in me ioviet
Union®
3. The attrelini ion: let at the World Petroleum Conress containa the néren ur the .
National Conittoes of the Iron Cartain countries.
Attached are listinee of thr
Czechoslounk irle aten and a"letter detailing the Hungarian deleratea aloni witn
financial arran renta
for them.
Ao The C/D will seo iub.j before he leaves ledco on 22 October.
It aid sit an a cite Mirates
.117
---
## Page 203
Lobile:
7 00t0ber 1966
SUNJECTS
Contact lieport/1I00z8-5 -P-27122
7 Uct 1145-1230, Subj'o office
I. Suby had been to los Angulos, Cilicornia for a feu daya and lad returned to
Mexico on 5 Oot.
Evidently he had acconpanied a Mietla delegntion that vialted
Douslas and lockhred aircraft roctories in California, He mentioned that
Aeronaves had purchaned two DCible fren Douslag, and ordered some Di-9'e.
the lockheed plint thoy saw the new super sontt airplane.
Suby had received on 6 Oot a confireatory telegram fron INTRIST, for suby.
and llo son (cory attached), re attendance as the INJURIST conference in roscow.
Also, In the mail of 70ot Aubj had receired INTUMIST mloados on travel mrulationa
for tourists to the Soviet Union,
rational plans, tours, oto. (subj will nake
copins of these for turnover tot
Suby reported that Yalentin
Loginos
care by the office on 29 Sept.. Suby was
with a friend, potor torr, of en
so he went to have coffeo with to-lner,
taking along his friond... The discussion was innocuous, but lopinov askod fulf
it he would he cine to see his frienda, chich subj too to cean that ill ina 0.Ko
as far as Subj's attordnnce In Moscoy for the IUlIST conference, Jubd negered
"yes". Locitov ickinely asked Subj whey rusk hid cone to inxico. Suny bantered
a reply that the ortoen liniotry of foreien Afirira was coine to serve oue rare
Chamjarne that tal liked.
Lo Inor pressed Subj for the rent ronson. Sui enid
crolly that teen, but he won't roing to tell lecinor. /cortent: hid hanter
we report to de coatrate the time of teln mahtr it eye te
hotreon Sui,
he terror.
Hare in fron Incision that borders on rirs for
inforction or involvian Suba, the latter turns er with a joking mater innov
accepts chia
toricor ood nturedly, Jokinny calling Jiby." 'nao of nibitey".
or worde
13.
aubd discary sit. tre Clo the prospect of his coire to the ovict union. le
mas debatin in lui cun mind the advisahility of ito the C/o probed to see has
Subj refrand it ran
nigeas standpoint, pitting the question "if you weidy't.
60, do you think i: sule hurt you frou the standmint of husiness." subi naia he
Just didri't inns. The c/o naked if othere went (Suny had just said that mess li
sarzn, thine eid diry (sarretio) nould ea althouth ther were not certain) did Surj.
think she Soviet rut thron the bulk of the businoss their way. Agnin Suby doid
he didn't knes.
The t/d then said that unless there vere sore overriding business
renson, Suby should take into accourt our view that there was a targin of hazard
COPIES MADE CL
CARI
Filed
---
## Page 204
20
to Subd's beire thairs the viet Union. Suby nold thirt perionally ho had no lmen:
deatre to 50. 8u the iciire linion, on three countag 1) the climato 2) "ho picarnt
wouldn't put out it mol corpot for him do they did reevirandy) und 3) he mos plain
afraid.
¿The latters risin antarently touched son hidden serine in Gulfo loritotaro
Subj had limiter: al' calliro the coviota "iontarde" etc. ind mnileienttie.
Now, Juby chided liegel"or dore no littlo to alloutato the lot or the Jera in
the soviet Union. le inclared that tho Sovlot Union was the vorot pfinder a minst
the Jens, becouse to vere olininating the race, not through thyalon extermintion
but thrust forein animilation. Mid son view mas that the Soviets were more.
annerous to the dect mid dardel than wore the Araba, for intance loberion or Joranny.
who if 1t vern't in four of Nasoer would make their peace with harnel.
The CO tried to cunter the self rcorinination of Subf by tolling him that
ho had accomplisten i apers job in the duel of the lost aith the Sovieto threwe
hio cooperation sich us. That, in viem of his real feelings about the Sovinto, hia
dening with them had bren masterful. Subf shook off the C/do optiolatio vie of
Subj'a contrilition to the "cause.""
4o. The c/o bront up the request to ret full detaila on the travel of nil ron
Soviets to the soviet linion and auerosted that Suby automatically havo duplientes
made of the visa requesto for such people.. Subj anid
that would be simple - and
ho would instruct Mirina" (the employce who handles INTUPIST travol) to make contes
of all aprlicationg for visas. Conments the C/O saked Suby 1f
ware coins to remin in hio enply, not taking a job at the laroell Embassy and
Subj ropliod tint de was colns to stay on in Subj's riralo.
Subj had roarked that he sas voing to discuss the mtter of makin the Horcow
trip with hia nife. The C/o asked that Jubj adviso un is soon as he had come to
a dociaion either ires a ainst coins to the Soviet Union.
The C/0 told subj, that he would pasa by hia office next neeR to rick up the
copies of the INTIFIST material.
CARDINO
PRM
COPIES MADE Leezy -5
CR-P.3l2
70ct66
---
## Page 205
SECRBT
LICOMT Onoral Notes Turned in on 6 October 1966
28, September 1966 (Thursday)
(LOGINOY) cano in for cigarottos.
He paid that there aro 52
Maylcang studying.
at Lusumba,
These students
ard solug to be
the directors in the schools of the Politechnico Nacional since
one of then has coso back well prepared in physics.
(Thote
follows a diatribo agalnst those bad Mexicans who wat to make
Mexico another Cuba.)
33 Buptember: 1966 (Friday)
The"Spanish' type" came in with a briefcase ind bought Raleighe
with filters. He had the ame type of billfold as the other
Sovlets.
He then went directly to the sabassy.
(I asked 11
he lad a noustache; he said, yos.
Thie is probably GAZIYIV)
34 Soptember 1960 (Saturday)
In tho afternoon SILNIROV uns thore when (ISAYEV) came in.. I
asked the latter about the watches.
and he said that they
wouldn't
arrive until the end of the year, SILNIROY loft at
25 Boptember 1966 (Sundar
Unimportant
88 Septenber. (Bonday)
A useless blurb about an unnamed Soviet who came in and discoursed
On MADRALO,
saying that he will set up a new party and an
anti-Soviet blast:
37 September (Tuesday)
(DENISOV) came in at 1210 and made a phone call..
• I beard him
mention Dolicios and del Rio.
Since these towns are near the
border near San Diogo, I thing be me talklog about smureling
arns to Quatenals (sic). Atteryards I asked alter his wife.
He sald that she and their daughter are in loscor and that he
o a batchelor Lashed if her mable house de fort at 1230.
anovered, of course, but they all want a house.
28. Beptember 1966 (ledneeday)
An account fron & friend that & Soviet will be pNGed for being
Involved with the Guatemalsn arus smuggling..
Cittactinent to
Licour. Contact
SICRET
Ripert, lacet lot
P-11712
---
## Page 206
: i.
CONTACT REPORT:
SUBJFCT:
-P-ü115
DITÉ OF MEETING: 28 Sopterbor 1968
offers
1o
LICOZX-5 reported on 20 September that LICANNYI
Tours. was one of those Invited to attend
• the 24-29. Intourist Conference In Moscow. This was
confirmed by LlENVoY on the same dato.
Since the Station
had had no contest with Subject sine 6 danuary ighh, I:
contacted Don Lautz of the Visa Seotion on 27 Septerber.
to see 1f Subject was still coming into the Embassy
regularly the on visa business.
Lautz
said that Subject
had for some time now been sending an agent to the
Embassy rather than coming himself. Lautz readily
agreed to give Subjeot a call, however, and reached.him
late that afternoon. He told Subject that the "people"
at the Embassy woom he had introduced Subjest to earlier
were Interested in talking with him and asked if he could
drop Into the Embassy in the next row daye.
Subjeot
Immediatoly recognized which "people" Lautz was referring
to, sald that as a matter of fact he had something to
discuss with
"them," commented that it probably in fact.
involved the same matter, and agreed to come to Laut's
office at 11:00 the next daye
As he had done with Irving
A. Oronslit, Lautz agreed to let me use his orfico to
talk to Subject.
2. I went to Lautz's offico at 11:00 or the 28th,
but when Subject had not appeared by 11:15, Lautz agreed
to call me in my office when Subject arrived. Lautz called
about 11:30, and I went right down. By the time I got
there, however, Subject had already explained to Lautz
that ho was sure I wanted to talk about his invitation to:
Filia: ce.
p.2712,
• sittinat
R1172013-1876 (rig)
i erada
A place da no ne l
cutlers no
para
---
## Page 207
14-00000
the USSR and had given Lautz a list of three other
Inutes to to Intrarlat conference. Lautz introduced
me by true name as Oronsky's replacement. Sutject, in
what-Lautz had forewarned me was his usuall over enthusiastio
marner, greeted no with a "bollevo mo, it is my ploasure"
salutation and, upon
confirming that it was the Intourist
conference I was interest in, took off from there:
Without
the slightest prompting, he rattled off the following:
a) He had recelved a telegram from
Moncow on
6 september inviting him to an Intourlat conference in
Moscow from. 24-29 Detober.
He had immediately thought
of Informing
the Embassy, but because of the pressure
of business siriply hadn't gotten around to 1t. When
Lautz called him, he knew Immediately what we were
intorested 1n.
b). He had prepared a Xerox copy of the telegrain.
for us; which ho gavo to mo.
He has not yet definitely
made up his mind about
attending the conference, but
thinks he probably will go. At the moment, he was still
awalting the detailed lotter on the conference which,
according to the telogram, was to folion. (LICOZY-S has
atready rocolved his lettor.) In reply to my question
as to whether he was sending enough people to the USSR
to make the trip really worthwhtle, he said that he
had sont only five people there so far this year, but
that he thought travel to the Soviet Union
was definitely
going to pick up. He said that LOGINOV, who has beer
thọ Sovlot official he has been dealing with about visas,
in.o
---
## Page 208
to Moscow could consequently bo made at rolatively little
additional expense.
c) Subject continued that 1f he did go to roscow,
ho would be glad to submit a report on his trip when he
got back, got (group) pictures, 1f we wanted them, of
his eyes open. However, he said, as he told Oronsky, ho
la not intorested in working for us on a pormanent basio,
was w9l1.a1g to help, he erplulned, because he belleved
basically what we did about current world problems and,
aftor all, had ilved in the Statas for many yearg and
rogarded 1t as his
"second home." He said he llked the
arrangement of meeting in Lautz!s office because 1t made
clandestine meetings unnecessary and because he had &
perfectly legitimate reason for being there.
d) Subject
stated that he had already given Lautz
the names of the other travel agents in Mexico whom he
had heard had been invited
to Moscow and said that once
he received the Intourlot letter givang the detalls on
the conference he would begin calling around to see
exactly who was going.
3. Since a) Subject had already volunteered to do
primarily what I Intended to ask him; b) had not yet
definitely dedided to make the trip, e) Lautz gave no
Indication of preparing to leave us alone, and a) I
clearly could not got any farther with Subject on a
personal level with Lautz present, I brought the meeting
to an end with a request to see Subject again after he
had recelved the Intourist letter, obtained the names of
nose of big colleasues mao were zoing and decided
definitely whether or not be was going to go. Subject
said he would be harpy to talk with ne again,. get the
---
## Page 209
14-00009
Information I santed, and, " If I liked,". "be briefed"
on the trip. It as agreed he would call Lautz to set
up the rectirgo (Tho. situation was such that I do not
blame Lautz for apparently thinking 1t unnecessary to
leave us alore this timo, but I made a special point
of requesting. that he leave us to ourselves next time..
Lauts, who seers to be thoroughly friendly and accommodatlngs.
readily agreed.)
4. Subjoct impresses me as a very sharp, shrewd,
cool-headod, but probably basically sincere indivlaual.
No had the situstion rigured perfectly when he arrived
In Lautz's office, had decided precisely what ho would
be willing to do, knew exactly what he was going to say,
and wasted no words in saying 1t.. I plan to try to got
to know him a little better next time, Elve him a defensive
briefing as well as one on what to keep his eyes open
ror, and also explore his attitude toward a possible
recruitrent piton from the Soviets.
(Prior to his trip
to the oss? in May 1963, Subject agreed to accept Sovlot
recruitment if approached and to serve as a Dy.. Upon
his return, boxerer, he reported that the Soviets mado
no approach to him! I also want to ask him about LOGINOV;
on whom he agreed to supply personality data
to oronsky,
put evidently never did. Subject mentioned
that LOGINOV had told him about ten days ago that he
had bee
romoted to Consul. Subject did not say. 1f
he had been in touch with LOGINOV or anyone olse at the
Soviet Embassy about the Intourist conference. : I will. -
got this from him sext time.
5°
Subject told Lautz that the following individuals
had been Invited to the Intourist conference:
(a)
Moises Schuster of Mundos Tours.
(b) Carlos IBARGUEN Of Do Carlo Tours (IBARGUSN
13
also the preslient of the Mexiean Travel Agents' Assoc.io
4
---
## Page 210
(e) Someone from the Garza Travol Servico.
Subject also gave me an Al. France tourist ramphlet on
the USSR in Spanish for ny information.
6i subjoct tentioned in passing that ho would bo
glad to furnish us (presumably on a regular basis) with
the names of those people who book travel to the Soviet
Union through his Agency, but said Oronsky dad previously
shown disinterest in such information. In view of Oronsky?!
alleged disinterest, I let the subject pass without comment,
but I see no reasoa not:
take up his offor: Besides furnishing
us with a sow more names, It would slve us a reason for
continuing contact with Subjeot.
---
## Page 211
diminis
-117
22
inicigerna
s-.17:
viver:
acaeno, jovee.
navina
axico (vice
Ca
resicence:
Car:
Croit dutios:
cas.
ME 61760281
LOGINOV - Phorno renta
---
## Page 212
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 213
Valentin S.
_LOGINOV (P11712) wich Bords A. CHMYKHOY.
(80235)
SOURCE
LICALLA 2 August 1968.
8.11112
lere
Dino
Karusten
---
## Page 214
pella 12100
71
fail, 112
---
## Page 215
P-11712
SOURCH: LILYRIC, 25 SEPT 1968:
---
## Page 216
14-00000
Valentin S. LOGUINOV
Third Secretary at the Soviet Embassy
Born in-1927
Wife Alexandra, born in 1928
Son Dmitry, born in 1959
LOGUINOV Is tall and has very curly, light brown halr. He speake
Quent Spanish and some English. He drives a green 1965 Impala with
•lomatic tags 19-DA.
Palenline.
I Loquinen
15-Á5-15
---
## Page 217
•2 4 3.12
io derare al
9: .
---
## Page 218
Penzia
hrealla - 20 sfil 68
7:120
---
## Page 219
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 220
Contact reports, photos, etc., forwarded from:
the field.
---
## Page 221
J000
SECRET
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Reepared Fy.
LIREALM-7
1282
2825
SECRET
LOGIUAN-P-11117
Va 19
---
## Page 222
SECRET
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
1. This. is d new, experimental version of the Personality Assessment
Questionnaire (sometimes informally called the PRQ Ill) which has been in
use for several years. This new form is largely a checklist and thus requires
far less essay type reporting than the previous form.
2. For a number of years, our operational psychologists have been de
veloping d system -for "indirect.assessment of larget personalities.. The
system employs-in lieu of psychological tests and interviews observations
of appearance, manner, and stile of behavior. Such observations are:
used as if they were items in a psychological test, and like test items, are
weighted and analyzed to yield a personality profile..
Working from the
profile, operational psychologists describe the target personality's basic
aptitudes, artitudes, motives and susceptibillies:
The goal of the assess.
ment is to identity feasible means of influencing the target person,
J. Reliability is vastly Increased when two or more observers complete
this questionnaire independently. All items need not be completed; in fact,
it isa rare case where contact is sufficient to complete it fully
You are
encouraged to guess where complete information is lacking.
Mark such
items with a "C." inslead of the customary check mark or "X." Thus, an
observer with very limited contact can be expected to enter more "G's"
than MX's."
SECRET
---
## Page 223
14-00001
A. Bofore completing the enclosed PAQ form, please provide the follow.
Ing information about yourself:
Age 39 sox MI Nationality US
Social-cultural. backgrounds
Middle-class
How often have you observed the target individual?
3.t04 times pere month over two
-years.
Then did you last observe the larget inaividual
ast week. /ucck»157eb.167)
Tennis club.
5. Can you supply a specimen of the target individual's handwriting?
Yes:: Na. X
Bit the main thou the penny elong walife n
knowledgeable to compléte this form at least in part.
GloRia Pinto
---
## Page 224
1.
1:01
1.02
1. 03
1.04
1:05
• 1.05
1.07
1.08
1:09
2.01
2.02
2.03
2.04
2.05
2.06
2.07
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
1. DESCRIPTIÖN
Overall Impression. (Check the most appropriate.)
Virile, athletic, practical, and socially facile ("Hail fellow")
Virile, rugged, practical, but socially guarded (authoritarian)
Rather soft and sensuous but socially pleasant and appropriate
(good guy)
Rather soft and sensuous but socially guarded and moody (a
possible whiner
Manly, clean-cut, professional, and socially smooth (execu
tive type)
Austere, précise, ond businesslike (dedicated worker type)
Cultured, neat, ortistic, and socially s
mooth (diplomatic type)
Sensitive, intense, and self-preoccupied (ristic or absent-
minded professor type)
None of these fit.
I would describe him os:
Dress. (Check the most appropriate.)
Well-groomed (natty)
Neat (well-kept)
Fastidious (fussy)
Overdressed (prissy)
Nondescript. (bländ)
Underdressed (informal)
Casual (indifferent)
||111X
---
## Page 225
14-000n
4.01.08
4.01.05
4.01.06
4.02.
4.02.01
4.02.02
4:02.03
4.02,04
4.02.05=
4.03
4.03.01
4.03.02
Does he have a nickname:
If. Yes, does he object to
being addressed by his nickname?
Is he addressed by a diminutive?
-(Johnny e Jack, Hank, etc.)
Does he have any scars or other distinguishing
marks?
If so, please describe:
Yes. NoX
Yes. No:
Yes X No
Yes. No Y
Hair:
Color
Very light
- Light
Medium X
Gray or white
Dark
Very dork
Waviness®
Curly Average
Straight
Amount
Thick.
- Average X
Bilding
Sporse
Bald
• Grooming
Unruls
Well-Aronge Unkey.
Is there anything unusual about his hair or hair style?.
If so, please describe:
Eyes
Color
Yellowish
Groy
Bive:
Haze light brown-
Brown
Wears eyeglasses
Alway'_ To read
Never X
---
## Page 226
4.03.03
4.03.04
4.03.05
•Eyeglass lens
•Eyeglass style
Thick
Average
Bifocal
Average frame
Mos, frame Contact lens
Is.there anythirg.unusualebout.his eyes.that.requires.
special mention. If so, please describe:
4.03:00
4.03.07
4.03.08
4.04
4.04:01
4.04.02
Does he rake off glasses when he speaks?
Does he use glasses to gesture?
- Does he ever wear sunglasses indoors?
• Complexion:
Coloring
Face.
Yes: No:
Yes_ NoX
4.04.03
Ruddy
(a)
. (b)
Scarred
Beard
Mustache
Describe type of mustache or beard:
Dark:
Tan.
Light X
pole.
Lined
'Smooth
Clean-shaven X
Unshaved
4.04.04
4:04.05
4:04.06
4.04:07
Body hair farms, legs, chesty
Heavy
Medium Light X
Hair visible on nose?
Hair visible on ears?
Is there anything unusual or striking about his skin or skin
coloring? If so, please describe:
anto
---
## Page 227
14-00000
— 4.05:
4.05.01:
- Face:
Expressiveness
Average i represe =
Nutural.
Tense:
4.05.02
If expressive, is face
4.05.03
If.inexpressive,. is face
•Relaxed
4:05.04- In general, are facial responses Inappropriate
Deadpan
Appropriate X
4:05.05
Is there anything unusual or striking about his facial
expressions? ll so, please describer When terise,
his hea a ba eyebeous and tilts
4.06
4.06.01
Lips:
Type
4.06.02-:
Smiles
4.06:03
4.06.04
4:06.05
4.06.06
Protruding
Spontaneous ly
(bMery frequently
FrequenTy:
Infrequertly.
Have you ever seen him smile to himself?
If you have seen him having his picture token,
con he smile on command?
Or is he wooden and rather ill-of-ease?
he would prefer?
cinder i hero to erie
Is there anything about his lips or smile that is unusual or
striking? If so, please describe:
Pursed
Full:
Thin X
Loose i
Mechanically:
Average
Never
Yes X No 22
Serious Smiling_
---
## Page 228
14-00000
4.07
4.07.01
4.07:02
4.07.03
4.07.04
4.07:05
4.07:06
4.07.07
4.08 -
4.08.01
4.08.02
4.08.03
Teeth
Shape
eguli
rotrudir
Average
Unusual
No: X
Do you get the feeling he clenches his teeth? Yes
If Yes, under what circumstances?
Does he have any gold teeth or unusual dental work?
Yes
• No X:
When he smiles, does he
Show his teeth?
Purse his lips?
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Put hand over mouth?.
Does he put his hand over his mouth when talking?.
Never
X Frequently
Occasionally
Always
White
Dull.
Color of teeth
Is there anything unusual of striking about his teeth?
If so, please describe:
Stained
•Posturé:
Straightriess.
Is posture maintained?.
Shoulders
Round-shouldered
Erect. X
Consistently X
Brood-shouldered
Average
Slumped.
• Stiff.
Variable,
Sloping
Narrow
= 6r
---
## Page 229
1d-0n0d
4.08.04
4.08.05
4.08.06
4.06.07
4-06:08
4.08.09
4.08.10
4.08.11
4:08.12
4.09
4.09.01
4.09.02
Body build
Skinny __. Average Heavy X Obese
When conversing, in what direction does he primarily
lean in relation to the other person?
Towards:
Away X
Neither
Does posture, when listening, differ from posture when talking?
NO
If so, please describe::
Sitting Posture •
When in a group; is he inclined
Relaxed
rect X. Average
Stiff
Slumped
To stand stil! X
Move about in one place
Lean against the wall
Sit down even though others are standing
Place his arms on others -
If taller than average, does he bend over to come down
to the group?
If shorter than average, does he stand up to the group?
Yes.
When listening to a lecture (or watching a play or movie)
does he
No
No
Is there onything about his posture, carriage, or bearing
that warrants special mention?.. If so, please describe:
Hands:
Dominance
Right-handed_
Is he inclined to use his less doninant hand?
Frequently _
Left-handed X
Never X
---
## Page 230
4.09.03.
4.09.04
4.09.05
4:09.06
4,0.9.07
*4.09.08
Size of hands
Very large
Lorge:
Small
Average
Very small
His use of his hands is Graceful
Average
In normal situations, his arms hang
Awkward
Loose
Stiff
Average
When standing (talking or listening) Tie has a tendency:
To open and close his hands
• Püt hands in pocket.
Run hand over face or hair
If he puts hands in pockets, he is more likely to put them in
Pants
Coat
Nails Clean, not manicured
Ragged
X Manicured
Dirty
Average
Bitten
4.09.09
4.09.10
4:09.11
4.09.32
4.09. 13
4.09.14
4.09.15
If nails are bitten, to what extent?
Barely_
Blunt.
Are fingers,
Are hands.
In public, does he
Callous :
Average
Average
Rough
"Smooth
Deeply
Long
Average
Soft
Does he put his arms on the table?
Does he put his 'elböws on the table?
Pull; rub, or pick nose
Rub back of neck
Run hand over face or mouthi
Scratch any part of his body
Pull at his clothes
Never do any of these things
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Often
Rarely
Sometimes
Never
When sitting at a table or desk, does he
talk
his hands?
or listen with his head in
Often
Rarely_
Sometimes
Never
---
## Page 231
1.09.10
4.09.17:
4.09.18:
4.09.19
4009.20
4.09.21
4.10
4:10.01
4.10.02
4.10.03
4:10.04
4.10.05
4.10.06
4.10.07
When talking, does he tend to
Close his eyes
Put his hand over his eyes
Often -
Sometimes
Rarely -
Never X
If he closes or covers his eyes, is he more inclined to do it
When trying to make d particular point
When listenirig to someone else_
Does he tap fingers on table?:
Never _Occosionally
Often
Is he more inclined to do this when
Talking _ Listening _
Thinking._
Does he
Rattle change in his pocket:
Toy with some object
Often
Sometimes.
Rarely
Never X
Is there anything unique about his hands of arms worthy of
special mention? If so, please describe:
Feet:
Does he lind to show foot preference?
Left
Right _
Does he work to keep in step when walking with someone?
-Yes
Does he cross feet at ankles when seated?
No
Yes =
No
If so, which foot is over the other?
Does he cross legs
Left:
Right
Only when he faces in a new direction
As soon as he sits down.
Shortly ofter he sits down
Occasionally
Never
• If he crosses legs, which leg is on top?
Right
Depends on how he is sitting
Does he change his crossed leg
ped ely epit in how he is facing
---
## Page 232
14-00000
4.10.08
4.10.09
4.10.10
4.10.1!
4.10.12
4.10.13
4:10.14
4.10.15
4.10.16
4.10.17
4.10.18
4.10.19
Compared to most people; does he walk
Faster _
If he is out of step with you, does he notice it arid get
in step?
Slower_ Somespeed
No _
In conversation when he becomes intense, does he.
Uncross his legs and lean forward
Uncross his legs and leon backward
Cross his legs and sit upright
Shift to a more erect position- *
Shift to a more relaxed position
Make little change, in position
Large
Average
• Smoll.
Are his feet
Are his shoes (a)
b) Highly polishe
Is there anything about his feet or legs that warrants special
mention?. If so, please describe:
• Blun!
When his legs are crossed, does
Sit quietly
- Move his root
Does he ever top his foot?
Does he swing back and forth on his
feet when standing and talking in d
group?
Somother
- When walking, are his steps Long.
Normal X
When he walks, do his arms
Swing or wiggle his leg a
No...
Rarely
Never X
short—
Hang loose
Swing with his stride X
Swing, but out of rhythm
Hang tense
When he walks, do his toes
Turn out Stay straight X
Turn in _
10
---
## Page 233
4.11
4.11:01
4.11:02
4.11.03
4.11.04
Voïce:
: Is his voice pitched
com_ Medium X High_
Does he speak:
Quietly_ Average X. Loudly: _
• In his native language, is his. tone quality noticeably
Quieter
_'About the same
Does he have a speech impediment?
If Yes, please describe:
Yes_ No_1
4.12
4.12.01
4.12:02
4.12.03
4.12.04.
4.12.00
Use of l'onjuago.
Does his native language vocabulary seem
Average
Limited
In his best language, other than nativer luche
Barely flüen
Moderately fluent X. Poor
Does he pick up idioms
_Does he learn foreign languages cosily
If Yes, does he.
Learn primarily by "feel" and by "irio and error".
Learn primarily from textbooks
In his best second language, can he switch from his native language
"Smoothly with little hesitation
Effectively with average hesitation
Slowly with considerable hesitation
Awkwardly with considerable embarrassment
When he misuses language, does he ordinarily appear
Aware of, but indifierent to ir X
Aware of, and anxious about it
Very amore of it and quite embarrassed
---
## Page 234
4.12.07
4.12.08
4.12.09
4.12.10
: 4.12.!
4:12:12
4.12.13
In general, would you characterize him as.
Connie
Average & Goriulous
In ordinary conversation, does the content tend to be primorily
Intorpersonal - murdol
Guarded
In ordinary conversation, is the content
Precise and to the point!
Relevant
Avergge
To the point bur rambling
Irrelevant
Does he
Often discuss personal problems
Rarely discuss personal problems
Does he use profanity in his native laguage?
Occosionally _ Frequently _ Never X
Does he use profanity in an acquired languagoguenity - Never.
Occasionally
Is there anything about his manner of speech or conversational
style that is unusual:"
No
If Yes, please describe:
4:13.
4.13.01
4.13.02
Gestures:
Does he gesture when he talks?
His most characteristic gesture ls.
Always Sometimes
Never
Pointing with finger,
Waving one hand
Sweeping both hands
Chopping both hands
-12°
---
## Page 235
$.13.03
When he gestures, the motion is
Groceful
Average_ Mechanical
4.13.04
When engaged in conversation, does he fense up:
Often
Rarely _.
Sometimes X
Never.
4. 13:05
It is relatively easy to tell when he is really interested in a subject
Always X
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
4.13.06
4.13.07--
His eyes are very expressive Always
Most people would find his eyes
Sometimes
X-Rarely -
Beautiful
Average X
Pleasont
- Unpleasant
Sinister.
4. 13:08
Ho maintairs eye contact
Always-
Frequently X
sometimes..
Rarely
Never
4.13.09
In a group, have you ever seen him stare repeatedly at a person
who seemed to interest him?. Often
Somctimes.
Never X
4.13.10
When he admires (follows with eyes) an attractive girl,
Obvious.
Averagé.
Subrle X
Thave never seen him do it
Have you ever seen him blush?
Yes X. No
If Yes, describe the situation:
st his political comments were successfully
at ai party. Ali present, includwe
timself were embarraised by the confrontation
Is there anything particularly striking and worthy of further explonation
about the movemens he makes with his bady, eyes, or head and me yes
way he behaves in a group? If so, please describe:
Sec
4.05.05
-13
---
## Page 236
4-00000
4.14
4.14.01
4.14.02
4.14.03
4.15
4.15.01
4.15.02
4.15.03
4.15.04
4:15.05
Sleep
Does he
Does he
Is he
Enjoy sleep and fall off easily?
Read or walk. lo prepare himself.
for sleep?
Rise easily?.
Prefer to remain obed until the
last moment?.
An early starter?
A lote starter'?
Yes. No
Yes_
_ No.
Yes. No
Impressions:
would keat if you knowlodgo, de pou think mat sorien
would find him:
would find him!
To the best of your knowledge du ally at ractive
Very unplegsant
Pleasant
verage
Unplessart
ery unpleasan
Without prior knowledge, yonderim on the rest rould
he impress you os
Striking
Without prior knowledge, and on the basis of looks alone, which
of the following do you think he might be?
• Peasant
Executive
Worker. X
Professionial..
Merchant
Military Officer
Artist-of some type
Les
If so, please describe:
conspicuously athletic.
Loots like boxeR:
-14-
---
## Page 237
14-00009
11. BÄCKGROUND
5.
5.01
General
Ethnic Background:
5.01.01 Please describe his ethnic background.
slavic-blond
5.01.02
How does he compare with others of this background? Like most
A stereotype:
Not like most
•I would never guess his background
5.02
5.02:01
Cultural Background:
If he had his personal choice, do you think he is the kind of
person who, living in a foreign cullure would
Never change his accustomed way of living
Maintain his accustomed way of living but
show some interest in the local culturé
Show some interest in the local culture and adapt his ways X
Go native if he had his chance
5.02.02 Compared with his own group, he is just like all the rest of them X
Somewhat different than most of them
Unique
5:03:
5.03.01
Educational Backgros
nd:
What is his educational background? Please describe:
-15-
---
## Page 238
14-00000
5.03.02
In your opinion, compared to most people in his culture with a
similar background he
Is as well-educated
Is better informed
Appears better educated than he claims
Appears less educated than he claims X
.:l cannot conceive of him having the background he claims.
If you doubt his background, please comment:
6 :
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
*6.05
6.06
6.07.
6.08
6.09
Géneral Impression of Background (Check the most appropriate):
Strong and rugged (a man's man).
Strong, rugged, but independent (a self-sufficient loner)
Compassionate, serisual and understanding (a woman's man)
Moody, emotional, and sometimes bitter (the "misunderstood"
man)
Forthright, intelligent, and responsible (the professional man)
Proficient, intelligent, and intense (the technical man)
Sensitive, cultured, and sophisticated (the "Madison Avenue"
mạin)
Sensitive, temperamental, and unconventional (the Bohemion:
man)
Nöne of these.
I would describe him as:
-16=
---
## Page 239
7.
7.0i
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05.
7.06
7.07
III. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR
General Impression. (Check the most appropriate.).
The kind of a man who is usually puntiual, inclined to greet every-
one informally and who appears to be comfortable with himself
when he enters a room.
The kind of a man who is always punctual, inclined to greet
everyone somewhat awkwardly and who appears to be uncom
fortable when he enters a room.
The kind of man whose punctuality is unpredictable; who is
inclined to be very warm and friendly with everyone he knows;
and who appears confident when he enters a room.
The kind of man who is punctual when he makes a date, but
who is inclined to cancel engagements rather, often, inclined
to greet only those people he has met before and is somewhat
retiring or standoffish when he enters à room.
The kind of man who is inclined to keep you waiting but is
"gracious and attentive wher, he arrives, inclined to be pre
cise and proper os he greets everyone, and can be quite
impressive when he enters a room.
The kind of man who is always punctual, inclined to be
very formal in his greetings and is most often stiff and
unbending when he enters a room.
The kind of man whose punctuality is unpredictable, whe
is inclined to be charming and sophisticated as he greets
everyone and is quite socially poised when he enters a room.
-17=
---
## Page 240
14-00009
7.08
7.09
8.
8.01
8.02.
8.03
8.04
8.05
The kind of man whö is often quite late-and indifferent
about it-inclined to be short and curt in his greetings
and is sometimes awkward when he enters a room.
None of these.
I. would describe him ass
Mecting People:
When he shakes hands
Does he move toward you
or Do you most often have to move toward him
Wher he shakes hands, is his grip
Very firm
Average
Firm X.
Weak
Limp
When he shakes hands, does he
Pump your hand
Squeeze your hand X
Let you do all the work_
Is there anything about the way he stakes hands worthy of
special mention? If so, please describe:
When he is first introduced, does he
Look the person in the eye to whom he is being introduced X.
Cock his head toward the introducer but
look at the person to whom he is being introduced
Cock his head and look at neither
-18
---
## Page 241
8.06
8.07.
8.08
8:09
8.10
When he firit heors a name, he
Does rothing obvious to remember it
Repegts it as he acknowledges the introduction
Asks the introducer to repuat or verify it.
Asks the person to whom he is being introduced
to repeat the nome:
If calling cards ore exchanged, does he
Read the card and carchully put if away
Read it and stick it in his pocket
Carefully put it away without reading it
Stick it in his pocket without reading it
When introducing someone, does he do so
With ease and grace
with
some
slight
embarrassment
hesitation
With considerable awkwardness
To what extent is his monner different when he is being introduced
to women?
Not or'all :
Normal X
Marked.
l he shows a difference, which of the following describes it?
Uses both hands when he tokes her hand
Moves in closer when acknowledging the introduction
Becomes more formal and distant
Becomes worm and effusive:
Becomes warm and effusive only with pretty girls
Is very courteous and gracious to older women
Varies, depending on the woman
If so, please explain:;
---
## Page 242
8.11.
8.12
8.13
g.0l
8.01:012
:9.01:02
When introduced.to a fair number of people at the some time
does he Linger o bit with eoch person to whom he is introduced
Acknowledge the Introduction quickly and wait for the next
Look toward the next person almost of the some time he is:
shaking hands with the person whom he has just met
In general, does he strike you as the kind of person who will
Always remember a neme's.
Remember names in an average monner X
Have difficulty remembering nomes
Be very poor at remembering names.
=
Has ho ever asked you to re-identify someone to whom you had
previously introduced him?
No
Yes:
Smoking and oting:
Smoking::
Does he smoke?
Cigarettes a
Regularly
a Occasionally
Never X
How nuch does he smoke?
Cigars
Regularly.
Occasionally
"Never X
Pipe
Occosionally
Never EX
Average sc.
Light:
-20-
---
## Page 243
9.01.03
9.01.01
9.01.05
9.01.06
9.01.07
9.01.08
4.01.09
9:01.10
9.01.11
9:01.12
9.01.13
8.01:14
Does he use his own
Is he the kind of person who
Does he use a holder?
Does he ellp cigan? Always
Does he care for his pipe?
Lighter
Matches..
Is always asking for o light
Frequently asks for o light
Usually has his own light:
Always. has his own light
Cigoretté:
Cigar
Always
" Al ways
Sometimes
Sometimes
Never re
7. Never
Sometimes
Bites"off, end
Fastidiously
Average
Neglects
When lighting a cigarette does he
Obviously duck his head and cup his hands
Light it casually while tolking
Have you ever seen him hold on unlighted cigarette and wait for
a pause in the conversation before. lighting it? No
Have you ever seen him put a cigarette in his mouth ond pause;
match poised, woiting for the appropriate time to light it?
• No-
Yes.
Have you ever seen him chew on an unlighted cigal, pipe,
or cigarette?
Yes
Is he a chain smokermho
Lights one cigarette from nother
Smokes his cigarette down to the nub and then lights another
Alwoys keeps o cigarette going even though he may
not smoke it very much
Does he smoke
Only offer meals
Only when offered a cigarette by someone
Between the entree and the dessert when others do
Is the presence of tobacco stain on his fingers
Very marked
Noticeable
Barely noticeabie
No stain.
-21-
---
## Page 244
14-00000
9.01.15
9.01.16
9.01.17
9.01: 18
9.01.19
2.01.20
9.01.21
9.01.22
9.01.23
When smoking, does he
Allow a long ash to accumulate on his cigorette
Flick off ashes in a normal manner 4
Become unusually preoccupied with the ashtray
(b):
Let ashes fall to the rug
Cup his hand under, his cigaret coal
Always use an oshtray
Does he
Put out a cigarette with elaborate oshtray ritual
Seem to put out cigarettes in a normal manner
Seem careless about how he puts out a cigarette
Does he
Show obvious enjoyment when smoking
Show average satisfaction
Smoke perfunctorily and mechanically
Is he the kind of person who offers a light to others
Always 223
Frequently
Seldom
Never
is ho the kind of per on it cos gro
Will walk across a room to offer a light to a lady
Is conventional in how he offers a light too lady. X
Will seldom offer a light too lady
To your knowledge, has he given up smoking for reasons of health?
-Yesi
Have you ever heard him mention that he should give up smoking
But canne!
Has tried to stop buf could not
Hall you ever heard him mention that he is bothered by mo
Cigarettes
over heed him mention any of their
Is there anything about his smoking habits that requires special.
mention of special description? If so, please describes
~22-
---
## Page 245
9-02
9.02:01
• Eating:
Is his mode of eöting
Typical of most of his colleagues X
Sorely atron, then hot of a college
9.02.02.
9.02:03
Is he d
Heary cater Average coler X Wish catere
Is the fact that he hos marked food preferences Very noticcable.
*Not particularly noticeable"
Not at all noticeable
9:02.04
Does he
eat with relishe
Enjoy his food in a conventional manner
Seem indifferent to food X
9.02.05
9.02.06
Does he cat
Quickly
Avcrage X.
slowly.
To take second helpings
To toke all he wants the first time around. X
Often leaves some of his food untouched e
9: 02.07
Does he
Dwell on how much he misses his native foods
Show conventional interest in local foods
Indicate considerable interest in new and unusual foods 22
9.02:08 16) He does not eat chile
Tolking listening
(o) He does eat maite.!
TalkingX
Listening X
9.02.09
Does he show a tendency to adapt to the table etiquette of the a
people with whom he is dining?
. Marked $
Average Xi
Maintains his fomiliar style of eating at all times
9.02.10
9.02.11
Sometimes
Always Roady: or
When eoting out
It is very difficult for him to select his meal
Waits to hear what his companion orders and orders same thing
Älways knows what he.wants.very quickly.
9.02.12
When eating out, he is-
Somewhat extravagant when he knows you ure paying
Very cost-conscious when he knows he is poying
Very costiconscious no matter who is paying
Generally indifferent about cost no matter who is paying
-23-
---
## Page 246
stain
9.02.13
Is he the sort of person who.
Usvally wants to check the bill regardless of who is payings
Is indifferent about the bill when someone else is paying
%02.14
When he is paying, he checks the bill
Unobtrusively
Very carefully (and rather obviously)
9.02.15
When he pays his check, does he,Obvidusly count his change
Show indifference when accepting his change
Take his change in a normal manner
9.02.16
When he deals with headwaiters, is he
- Aggressive
Normal and conventional
Somewhat ingratiating
Brusque XI
9.02.17
9.02.18:
9.02.19
i he prone To come long when enice does net sys him
Directly Nos
Not of all:
He handles waiters
In a conventional way
Over friendly
Unwally polite
is there anything about his eating habits or manners that requires
special mention ? li-so, Please describe:
9:03
9.03.01
9:03.02
9.03:03
Drainer get plan end molin othere. Check the
A hearty eater with walladefined preferences.
He eats and me
with considerable gusto buf tends to be a little on the course ond
boorish side. It is rather easy to imagine him eating huge sand"
wiches and drinking beer with the boys at the neighborhood. bar
A heavy eater with limited preferences.
He eats and smokes
with gusto but his manners are definitely course and boorish.
I is rather easy to imagine him becoming quite sharp with a
waiter who serves tim-unfamiliar, fond or a dish prepared in
on unfamiliar way.
A sensual eater who knows all the restaurants and their native
specialties. He is very anxious to have others try dishes he
has discovered. He eats with obvious pleasure, savors-his.
smokes, and though rarely gauche, he is more aware of his
food than his manners.. It is easy to imagine him cooking and
serving special dishes to his friends.
-24-
---
## Page 247
9.03.04
A sensual eater who tends to eat by himself when possible..
He seems to eat all types of food and has something of the
air of a glution about him. He eats with obvicus pleasure,
savors his smokes and afterwards will linger alone at o toble
with self-satisfaction. It is easy to imagine him hovering
alone over the buffet ata cocktail party savoring the tidbits
A conventional eater who usually goes along with the crowde
He probably has food allergies that prevent. him from eating:
certain foods. He gives the impression of enjoying smoking
more than eating but his table manners cre adapted to what-
ever situation he is in. It is easy to imagine him taking on
indigestion pill in the privacy. of his room.
A conventional eater who always goes along with the crowd.
He eats with little relish and rarely mentions anything about
his likes or dislikes. He smokes at every opportunity; but:
more mechanically than with pleasure: He usually tries to
adapt his manners to the situation but may be a little awkward
and obvious in doing so. 'It is eosy to imagine him grabbing o
bite at a sidewalk stand at any time of day.
A gourmet eater who has marked and voried sophisticated
food tostés. Dining is quito a ritual with him, and atmo-
sphere and service are almost as important as the food. He
Is graceful and cultured at table and smokes in the same
manners its easy to imagine him dressing for dinner, ens
joying fine wines and food by condlelight.
An unconventional eater, a man who "eats like a bird."
He cots in a preoccupied way, obviously, indifferent to
his food and surroundings. It would not be surprising to
learn he was a food faddist (vegetarion, health food
etc.)
None of these descriptions really fit;
I would describe him os
---
## Page 248
9.04.
9.04.01
9.04.02
9: 04:03
9.04.04
9.04.05
9.04.06
9.04.07
9.04:08
9:04.09
9. 04.10
9:04,11
Drinking:
Does he drink?
Not of all
Average
A little Heavily
•Does he drink
alone (solitary drinker)
with others mainly for sociablenes
on formal occasions only
after work, of home.
Does he appear to drink primarily for the taste
primarily for the effect
for both,
His favorite drink is
Vodka -
Wine
Whiskey
Gin.
No preference
He prefers
_ocktails
Straight shots
Highballs Short drinks
He drinks
Slowly!
Average X
Quickly:
Does he
Gulp his drink Sip his drink X
Does he
• Go out of his way to get a refill.
Usually.woit until asked
Always wait until asked
Attitude foward wines?
Very knowledgeable
Enjoys but not particularly knowledgeable 23
Indifferent about wines
Knows nothing, couldn't care less X
Does he Talk at length (and obviously get pleasure fron
talking) äbout his liquor preferences
Talk abour his liquor preferences no more than
anyone else:
Never talk about his liquor preferences
Is he openly proud of his native drinks and does he urge others to
try them?
Yes;
_ No X
'Is he conventionally aware.of his native drinks and offer them
when appropriate?
Does he soroly mention his nolive drink ind nar "push them?
Yes No
-20-
---
## Page 249
14-00000
9.04.12
9.04.13
8.04.14
9.06.15
9.04.161
9.04.17
Does he Pay litile attention to the drinking needs of others:
Serve drinks in a socially appropriate manner
• Tend to force drinks on others
Compared with his colleagues, what are his drinking habits?
When he has aid a few drinks, his behavior shows
No noticeable change Y
Some change
A definite change.
If a definite change, please describe:
Does his manner of speaking change when he drinks?
Becomes quite slurred
Shows little change:
Does not change at all X.
When he drinks, his voice becomes
Louder
have you ever seen him truly drunk?
If so;
was he Socially active
Boisterous
Hostile
Quiet, withdrawn
Quieter_ No change:
No X¿ Yes
Well-controlled
Poorly coordinated
Depressed
Sexually aroused
-27
---
## Page 250
8.04:18
9.0419
9:04.20
If you have not seen him drunk, would you predict that wher
drunk he would become
Very unpleasant_
Very aclive- Rother pleasant 2
Very passive
Never become drunk X
I cannot imagine how he would act when drunk
Have you ever seen him with & hang over?
if Yes, is he the kind of purson who
Obviously looks hung over but functions fairly well
Looks somewhai hung over but shows it mainly in
his eyes and general manner
Obviously looks hung over and is quite vocal about
how bad he feels
Does not look hurig over in spite of what he says
Is there anything special about his drinking habits that requires
mention? If so, please describe:
9.05
9.05.00°
9.05:02
9: 05:03
9.05.04
Overall impression of drinking behavior: (Check the most appropriate)
A hearty, heavy drinker who holds his liquor well. He is
always rather boisterous, and wher he drinks, there is little
change in behavior.
A heavy drinker who often gives the impression he con drink
others under the table:
When he drinks, there is little change
in behavior, but there is a hint that he could get quite mean
if provoked
A steady drinker who obviously enjoys being "tight." In d way
he can be somewhat charming when drunk and can get away
with a bit of the "life of the party" routine.
A steady drinker who becomes somewhat more maudlin when
drunk or tight. Tends to tell people how much he likes them
and sometimes osks others whether they like him. Gives an
impression that he could become quite disgusting if he got
very drunk.
-28--
---
## Page 251
9.05.05
9.05.06
9.05.07
9.05.08
9.05:09
A steady drinker who holds his liquor very well. He ol
ways remains quite dignified and usvally maintains his poise
even though others are becoming quite drunk or tight. He
still remains part of the crowd, however that is, he gives
few signs of being disgusted or bored.
A light drinker who paces his drinks. He seems to drink only
because in is socially necessary. As o party progresses he
tends to become oloof and distanti. Is likely to continue to
talk about his work even when it is inappropriate.
A light drinker who tapers off as the evening progresses.
Usually manages to keep a sophisticated aloofness from
others Often singles out and associates with someone
rather like himself. As the party progresses, he shows.
obvious distaste for anything he considers crude or bois-
-ferous: Often becomes quite sarcostic about others'
belavior.
A very light drinker who either drinks only because he
has to or refuses to drink at all. Is esilly not really
a part of the party and is obviously annoyed when others
bring him in against his wishes. Tends to be solitary
and sometimes will leave unobtrusively when the oppor
tunity presents:
None of these descriptions really fit:
I would describe him os:
10.
10.01
10.01.01
Driving and Walking
Driving Behavior:
He drives a car in an
Unusually. odept manner
Averoge or conventional manner
Unusually inept monner
He does not drive
-29÷
---
## Page 252
14-000n
10:01.02 He drives
Very fost
Average Very slow
10:01:03 When he drives and talks, you get the feeling
He pays little attention to his driving
He pays overage ottention to his driving
His driving is obviously more imporiant than his conversation
-10.01,04
Compared with his colleagues, his interest in foreign cors is
About the some
Definitely different
10.01.05
His interest in the care and maintenance of automobiles is
Unusual
Average:
_Little or none
10.01.06
His road courtesy is
Equivalent to most of his colleagues
Equivalent to the courtesy of most people! know
Unusual in that he is very courteous and cautious
Unusual in that he is rude and demanding
10.01.07
To the best of your knowledge, he is the kind of person who
Con learn how to get ground a strange city very quickly
Can follow a rood or city mop with relotive eose
Gets ground by asking lots of questions
Almost always depends upon others to get him where he is going
10.01.08
When riding with someone else, is he the kind of person who is
very much aware of the driving and responds with the driver
(goes through motions of braking; braces with changing traffie)?
10.01.09
When driving with someone else, is he the kind of person who
seems to adapt to the style of driving in an averoge or appro
priate manner?
No "
Yes
= 30=
---
## Page 253
10.01.10
When driving with someone else, is he the kind of person who:
is very relaxed and relatively indifferent to the driving?
Yes
10.01.11
Is he the kind of person who
Would never drive when drinking
Is inclined to be owore when he should not drive
Would always insist on driving, even when drunk
10.01.12
Will he offer someone a lift?
When it is appropriate
Almost always
Never
10:01.13
Is there anything about his manner of driving that requires special
mention? If so, pleäse describe:
10.02
10.02.01
Walking:
Is he the kind of person who
10.02.02
10:02.03
10.02.04
10.02.05
10.02.06
.10.02.07
Does a greät sical of walking...
Wäll's an average amount.:
Never walks if he can help it:
Whon he wolks, his pace is. Fast
Average
Slow
When you walk with him, he most often
"Keeps pace with you
forces you to keep up with him
When he walks, do his feet Swing to the right and left (outwards)
Maintain a fairly parallel motion
Swing inward
Does he walk
Erect with head up
Erect with head down
Bent forward but eyes up
Bent forward with eyes down.
In a very stouped monner -
When he is walking, he looks ground
A great deal
Average
Never
When he greets someone he knows on the street, his face
• Lights up
Shows overage or appropriate expression
Rarely changes expression
---
## Page 254
10.02.08
Is there anything unusual or striking about his gait or mannér
of walking? If so, please describe:
10.03.02
10.03:06
Overall impression of driving and walking behavior:
(Check the most appropriate descriptions)
An active, olert individual with a purposeful stride who appears
to have a very practical mind. He enjoys "fixing things,
..ap
peors to have sound knowledge of automobiles, and drives in o
relaxed efficient-manner.
An active individual who is somewhat stondoffish (or negative)
toword others. His stride is fast and intert., He appears to
have a practical mind, is quite possessive and protective and
is roluctant to share his possessions with others. He "fixes
things" in a matter -of-fact way, appeors to have good know
ledge of automobiles, and drives in a determined (sometimes
even hostile) but efficient manner:
An active, alert individual with a fice-and-easy stride who
appears most of the time to:be in good humor. Seldom tries:
to fix things, but is often quite good at getting others to fix
things for him.. He appears to have little knowledge of auto-
mobiles but drives in a relaxed, efficient manner:
An active individual who hos a cautious tinge to his walk ais
though he is easily embarrassed or easily startled. He appears
rather helpless and awkward when he has to "fix things." He
evidently has little knowledge of automobiles and drives in d
coreful (sometimes tense) but efficient manner.
A well-controlled and attentive individual who walks in
something of a clipped, formal manner
Although generally.
practical, he seldom will do anything by
"feel.". He must
read up and prepare himself when required to "fix things,"
He appears to have acquired considerable knowledge about
automobiles but drives in a somewhat mechanical or highly
controlled manner.
A well-controlled individual who is often somewhat preoccu-
pied even in his walk. When he takes time to "fix things" ho
does so with intensity, and precision. He is often very well
read about automobiles and cores for his cor or sees that it is
cored for meticulously. However, when involved in conver.
132-
---
## Page 255
10.03.07
10.03.08
10:03.09
10.04
10.04.01
sation or otherwise preoccupied, he con sometimes be quite
a dangorous drivor:
A well-controlled individual who has a glide (or grace) in
his walk.. He has little or no interest in "fixing things"
but usually knows the best places to get things done and is
inclined to be quite particular in how things are done for
him. He appears to have relatively little knowledge of
the mechantes of an automobile, but appreciates and takes
good care of a good automoble. He drives with confidence,
but usually ot a fast pace with not too much owareness of
others.
A rather nervous and temperamental person who walks rape
idly and rather awkwardly:
He has little or no interest in
"fixing things" and is inclined to ignore or throw away
things.that do not work. He appears to have little interest
in or knowledge about automobiles and his driving shows it.
It is sometimes frightening to ride with him:
None of these descriptions really fit.
I would describe him as:
Hobbies nd Sports
Does he have any hobbies?
Yes
if Yes, describe his hobbies:
Tennis
Don'" Know
in No or Don't Know, what is your best guess on the hobby most
likely to interest him?
Can"t imagine him having any kird of hobby
- 33-=
---
## Page 256
10:04.02
10.04.03
10.04.04
Collecting What does he collect? Guns, stamps,
coins, books, butterflies, ete.)
As a collector, is he Alicared Modentel
.Only.casual:
Artistic (painting, ceramics; etc.)
• Mechanical (motors, hi-fi-building, etc.)
Skill (woodworking. model building, etc:
Intellectual (special periods in hispory,
philosophy. etc.)
Active (group dancing, such light sports as
ping pong, bowling or volleyball)
Outdoor (hunting, fishing, golf, ctc.)
Social (chess, poker, bridge, etc.)
Vicarious (listening to music, attending plays;
ball games, etc.)
Mental amusement (crossword puzzles, ana-
grams; cryptograms)
Has he ever mentioned having had hobbies in the past? Yes
If Yes, give details:
How well does he dance? unus gly out nor daned
good average
poor X
do not know if he dances
Describe the kind of dancing you have seen him do:
Foxtrot, cumbias
-34-
---
## Page 257
10.00.05
10.04.06
10:04:07
10.04.08
10.04.09
10:04.10
10.04.1l
10:01.12
10.04.13
Does he play chess?
Yes KNo
believe he is probably good
if Yes, do you know he is good believe he is probably averase
know he is an average ley believe he is probably a poor player X
know he is a poor player.
If you are a poker player, describe the kind of poker player you think
he would be:
FaiR
is tie the kind of person with whom you would like to play poker?.
Yes.
No
If. No, explain:
Have you heard him sing?
Yes X No
Yes, is his voice good average poor X
Does he seem tổ know many songs?.
Yes_ No X
off with a song
Yes_ Now
Has he ever mentioned having played an instrument?
If Yes, give details?
yes?
Does he participate in an active sports?
Yes X No.
If yes, describe:
Tenmis, embassy volley baht
- 35
---
## Page 258
10:04:14
10.04.15
10.04.16
10:04.17
10: 04.18
10.06.19
If No, what is your guess regarding the kind of sport that would
interest him most:
He definitely is not the sports type
Body contact sports (football, rugby,
i soccer, ete:)
Skill sports (tennis, handball, volleyball, efc) 3.
Individual skill sports (swimming, archery,
skeet, efc.)
He is likely to be interested in all kinds of
sports
Does he play golf?
No X.
If Yes; does he toke goll very seriously take golf in on average
woy
_take golf indifferently
As a golfer, do you know he is good:
believe he is probably. good
.know.he is an average ployer
believe he is probably averáge
know he is a poor player
believe he is probobly a poor player
If you are a golfer, is he the kind of person you would like to play with?
•Yes:
•If No, explain:
Does het hunt a great deal never hunt
fish a great deal
do some hunting a
do some fishing
never jo fishing
Do you have information on how seriously he takes hunting or fishing?
Yes.
No:
If Yes, explain:
Has he ever mentioned participating in sports to the post? Yes Nei
If Yes give details (include ony mention he may have
mode of medals, trophies, team membership, etc.):
BoxIng
•36-
---
## Page 259
14-00000
10:04.20-
10.04.21
10.04.22
10.04.23
80:04.24
10.04.25
Have you ever heard anyone describe him es an athlete? Yes NO
'If Yes, give detoils:
everyone
Is he the kind of person who:
is very much preoccupied with keep-
ing in shape
works at keeping in shope to on
overage degree
shows little interest in keeping in
shape
Has he ever indicated an interest. in weight lifting?
Yes: No.
If Yes, explain:
He is best described as
'a muscular, athletic type
an effeminate type
a strong..
Is he mechanically inclined?
Yes
No
If. Yes," does he
Prefer to follow instructions in books
Ignore instructions and.try to figure.
it.out for himself
:.If it were possible to provide American magazines or periodicals for hims
which of the following do you think he would really enjoy:
The New York Times
Saturday Review ATlantic_
Field. and Stream
layboy Xi Sports illustialed, & Life New Republic_
• Popular Mechaniçs"
Better Homes and Gürdens Reoders Digest -
Chition satience Marina
Ramparts.
* Scientific American
Con't imagine him reading on American magazine
-37-.
---
## Page 260
10.04.26
10.04.27
10.04.28
What books, if any, have you heard him mention as having read and enjoyed?.
What movies, if any; have you heard him mention as having seer and enjoyed?
If he had his choice, would he most likely afrends
a movie. the theater.
the ballet
a soccer match X a bullfight
..di concert:
10: 05
10: 05:01
eck
where
applicable)
Delegutes: work
Can't delegate:
Productive: •
Thinker type
Organized
Disörganized
Feels work is not
apprecioted.
10.05.02
eir
31113011
work
211/01.111
Don't Know
AIM 111
---
## Page 261
Superiors
Trust his judgment
Like him
Dislike him
Delegate responsibility
to him:
See him socially
10111
IV: EMOTIONAL SET
I. Temperament arid. Humor
11.01
Temperament:
11,01.01
in his relations with others would you consider him
Shy win
Guarded
Conventional and correct
Outgoing
Warm
11.01.02
Is his conversational style
Awkward
• Hesitant
Contrived
Convertional
Comfortable
Easy
# Volüble:
11:01.03 His manner of relating to women is About the same as with men
More correct and controlled than with men
More worm and relaxed than with men X
11:01.04"In general, do you think he is a person who
Loses his temper casily.
Has a quick temper but holds it well
Hos a normali tempér
Has an even temper and is rarely ruffled
Has an unusual amount of tolerance and
would almost never lose his temper
11.01,05
Yes
Have you ever seen him lose his temper?
If Yes, give a short description of the incident, inclüding
how he reacted.
-39-
---
## Page 262
14-00000
11.02.
11.02.01
11.02.02
11.02.03
11.02.04•
11.02.05
11.02.06
11.03
11.03.01
11.03.02
Humor:
Is he. a person whom.you
Have never seen tease anyone
Hove frequently seen tease someone
cannot imagine ever feesing cryone:
onsider his feridency to tease like that of mast people X
Is he a person:
Who obviously cannot take teasing
- Whom most people enjoy feasing
• Whom most people would never consider leasing
Who obviously likes to be teased
His serise of humor is
About like that of most people..
Notably absent.
Clever
Subtle
Dry
Heovy X Crude
Does he tell jokes and anecdotes?
Never..
Sometimes
Frequently X
As a story teller, he is Very good Average Poor A
-Is he more inclined lo tell a story
To a group of people X
Quietly to a friend or acquaintance
Only when encouraged
Overal! impression of temperament und sense of humor
(Check the most appropriate description.)
He is o hearty, hale fellow who laughs with gusto and pleasure
His humor is forthright, not subtle, and although he is sometimes
loud, he is rarely unpleasant or objectionable. Most of the
time, his good humor. is contagious.
He is a hearty fellow who, when he laughs, does so with con
siderable gusto. However, he is fréquently dour and sometimes.
intolerant and somewhot humorless. His humor is direct, even
crude, end at times, inappropriate. He tends to be the kind of
person who laughs more at people than with people.
---
## Page 263
14-0000
11.03.03
18.03.04
11.03.05
He is à good-humored fellow who sometimes can be considered
jolly and carefree. His humor is clever and well timed. He. is
quite sensitive to the moods and feelings of others and often
can do d good job appropriately livening up a party. Although
something.of a tease, he is never cruel or insensitive.
He is generally a rather quiet and somewhat complacent person
who, or times, can be surprisingly goy and carefree: However,
when gay, he sometimes overdoes it and causes some strain for
those ground him. His humor is öften cleyer but he con be
quite sarcostie and even biting on occosion.
He is on urbane fellow, generally quite corventional and appro
priate. He does not necessarily appear to be a humorless persion,
but he seldom displays his sense of humor. It is sometimes diffi
cult to tell whether he is in a good humor, because of the way.
he covers or controls his feelings. His humor is more studied:
than spontaneous yet it is never crude or inappropriate:
He is a dour and humorless person always serious and intense.
It is difficult to joke around him partly because he is not re
sponsive and partly because he seems to disapprove.
He is ó sensitive, sophisticated fellow with a subtle wit. He
can be quite charming and amusing in the right sort of setting.
However, there is something of an aristocratic quality to his
sense of humor and he. con be quite condescending towards
people who do not understand or appreciate his sense of humor -i
He is go arty somewhat cypical person who con be quite
flippant of times: His humor tends lo be a bit farout: He
seems to have private jokes he shares with intimates. It is
sometimes difficult to tell whether he is being amusing.or
subtly hostile:
None of these fit. I would describe him oss.
---
## Page 264
12.
112.01
12.01.01
Sexual Altitudes
General;
Are his attitudes about sex
12:01.02
:12.01.03
12.01:.04
12.01.05
Difficule. No detencore
About average for his culture and background
Clearly.uninterested
: Indifferent
Clearly interested X
In the presence of women, he is
Stilted
Flirtatious X
Hostile
Conventional
Vulgar
Indifferent
Does he go to "girlie" shows
Often
Never
Sometimes with a group
Can't imagine him ever going
I have no idea what he thinks of "girlie" shows
Does he, in the presence of male companions, talk about sex?
Often
Sometimes
Rarely s
Never
other he hay chen thin he /ol bechovioriono/.ivd.no idea
If Yes, describe the change:
-42-
---
## Page 265
14-00000
12.01.06
12.01.07
12.01.08
12:01.09-
12.01.10
12.01:11
• Do you have any idea how he feels about prostitutes?
Yes
No
If No, do you shink he is the type who would go to a prostitute
Connot imagine him visiting a prostitute
Have nothing to base an opinion on
If Yes, is he
Obviously. negativistic toward prostitutes
Indifferent fowärd prostitutes
• Interested In prostifutes
In his relations with women, does he
Generally act in accordance with his age and experience
Generally.oct somewhat immoture and indppropriate for
his age and experience
Show considerable facility and poise X.
Show considerable uneäsiness or awkwardness
in describing an attractive woman, ieh most likely fo mercians
Eyes
Clothes
Figüre
Legs.
Personality
Have no idea.
Have you ever heard him described in any way by a woman? Yes. X
If Yes, what did she say?
athletic, vicile, marily:
12:02
12.02•01
12.02.02
Overall impression: Which of the following best describes him?
He is on earthy, lusty man who shows little embarrassment about
sex. He treats women appropriately, but makes little effort to
conceal his admiration and attraction. He appears virile and
self-confident with women; and most women seem to like it:
He is an earthy, lusty man who on occasion con be crude or
even vulgar. He ireats women rather harshly, und con become
quite pushy when attracted to a woman. He seems to be very
proud of his virility. Many women would be offended or ser.
buffed by his aggressiveness, But shis does not seem to bother
him.
543-
---
## Page 266
12.02.03
12.02.04
12:02.05
12.02.06
12:02.07
12.02.08
12.02.09
He is a somewhat sensual, rather soft man-who is very consid
crate of women. He is prore to hold a moman's hand overly
long when talking to her and frequently puts his arms around
women he admires. He often uses flattery and complimerts.
but does so rather graciously. Most woren üsually like his
attentiveness.
He is a sensual person, but is embarrassed and insecure about.
it.. He is o rather soft man who tries hard to be inoffensive..
However, he will frequently follow attractive women with his
eyes when he thinks no one is looking: He is also prone to
brust against or touch women "occidentally" whenever he gets
a chance.
He is a self-confident, rother polished person who is proper
and convertional, with either men or nomen. He is olwäys
•considerate and polite with all women and it is difficult to
discertain what his sexual attitudes.and interests might be.
In a group, he always behaves according to protocol and
usually can be quite efficient in daing so.
He is a self-confident and precise person who has something
of the air of a professional man about him. He is polite,
almost to a fault, and is inclined to go out of his way to.
light a woman's cigaretté or see that she is properly taken
core of: Nevertheless, he shows considerable distance in
his relations with worien. Sometimes his formality is out
of place, but he will rarely, if ever, change his manners
or procedures to fit the situation.
He is a charming, urbone person and both friendly and
sophisticated. He deals with women in a cultured way
but shows little sensuality or sexual inappropriateness:
He is neat, even dapper, and con be quite fastidious..
Most of his relations with women appear to be quite pla-
tonic. He is the kind of person who likely has several
very close friends who are women:
He is o somewhat shy and indifferent persón whöm some
people consider odd or unusual. He shows little or no
interest. in women in' public. In general, he is a preoc
cupied person who only seeks out people with similar
interests.
There is an oscetic, asexual air about him
most of the time.
None of these fit. I would describe him as:
---
## Page 267
V. FAMILY SET
13. Marital Status
13.01
13.01:01
13.01.02
13.01.03
13.01.04
13.01.05
13.01.06
Is he married?
Yes: X
No
Is his wife with him?
Yes X
No
Does his wife go out socially with him
Never
Seldom X Averogo
Offen_
Is his wife: older than he
about his aga
yourger than he
con't tell
Is his wife: unusually atträctive.
unusually unattractive
attractivo to an average degree
Generally speaking, is his wife: sociolly poised
socially adequate X
socially gauche
What languages other, than her native language does his wife speak? Spanish
13.01.07
13.01.08
Is his wife: better educated than he
educäted about the same
Hos he been married before:
if yes, give details if known:
loss educated
No
13.02
13.02.00
13:02.02
Does his wife seem to; have many friends
almest no friends X
In public, is he: very attentive to his wife
oppropriotely. oftentive to his wife
indifferent towards his wife
In public, is his wife: very attentive to him
appropriately attentive to him
indifferent to him
o few friends
13.02.03
Would you characterize his wife as:
aggressive
domineering
independen!
• complacent
submissive X dependent.
-45-
---
## Page 268
13.02.04
13.03
In the area in which she lives, does she oppear to be:
very satisfied normally satisfied X.
very dissotisfied
Have you been to their home?
if Yes, how often?
Yes
No X
13.03.01:
13.03.02
13.03.03
13.03:04
13.03.05
• 13.03.06
13.03.07
13.03:08
13.04
Are their living quarters: unüsually nice for the cred
typical of the oreo:
unusually poor for the area.
Are they, os a couple:
unusuelly good hosts
good hosts
adequate hosts
somewhat inadequate hosts
unusually poor hosts
Dog the wife a lon yery comfortable of te hoster a hostess.
adequate as a hostess
very uncomfortable as a hostess
Are their living quarters: a reflection of his persorality
a reflection of both their personalities:
a reflection of heither of their personolities
In gueri, hi furnishings surely nis
unusually drab
conventional
Is his wifes obviously very interested in her home
obout. as interested in her home as most women in the area
obviously very uninterested in her home
cannot really tell whether she is interested or not
Is her social behavior at heme:
Icss.comfortable
Under ordinary circumstances, are they:
the kind of people who entertain öften and like it-
the kind of people who meet their social obligations and rather enjoy it
the kind of people who enjoy entertäining only close friends
the kind of people who entertain only when they have to
the kind of people who really Jislike to entertain
Does ho ever criticize his wife:
Yes
No
If so, what is he most likely to criticize:
---
## Page 269
13:04.01
13.04.02
13.04.03
13.04.04
13.05:
In general, as a couple are they:
obviously very.compatible
as compatible as most
obviously not very compatible X
Is he inclined fo: never appear jealous of her
rarely appear icalous of her
often appear jealous of her
Is she inclined tos never appeur jealous of him
rarely appear jealous of him X
often appeer jealous of him
Is there anything about his wife that deserves special mention or
description?
As a husband, ho is best described as:
An outgoing man who obviously is the dominant partner in the
marriage. He is protective of his wife, and always includes her
when possible in his social activities.
An'active man who is authoritarion. and dominant as a-husband.
He is possessive of his wife and tends to be demanding in their
relationship
An outgoing man who is quite dependent upon his wife. She
tends to be the more dominant partner and he seems to like it and
expect it.
An active but somewhat surly man who is obviously very dependent
upon his wife but will rarely odmit it
He may have some tendency
to be jealous and possessive about his wife.
A conventional husband who treats his wife with respects He
forely shows his feelings in public. It is difficult to tell how he
really feels about her.
•: A conscientious husband who takes his marriage quite seriously.
His wife is obviously part of the team and they both take family
and social responsibilities seriously
A socially active man who can be quite charming with the ladies
even when his wife is present.. They both seem to lead separate
but quite compatible lives:
A quiet mon who is obviously very dependent upon his wife.
She looks after him rather unostentatiously but it is obvious that
she hos considerablé influence on his behavior and attitudes.
X None of these fit, he is best described os:
daninant paztner.. Independent of
wite, Indifferent to here Wieds
-47-
---
## Page 270
13.00
Houschold:
Is tie concerned about thé appearance or functioning of the
household?
_No.
Does he make mirior repairs himself?
•If Yes!
Fairly.competently.
Awkwardly
Yes no.
1d: Children:
:14.01
1o1.oi
14:01.02
14.01.03
14.01.04
14.01.05
14:01.06
14:01.07:
Does he have any children.
Yes X
- No
How many 1 What ages.
10+18 sexorchildren male + fem
Are oll the children with him?
Yes_ No X
If not, where are they?
Giel moscow
Does he: pay unusual attention to his children
pay normal attention to his children
pay little attention to his children
Is his wife: an urusually attentive mother
on average mother
an unusually unattentive mother
Are the children: unusually. woll behaved.
normally well behaved
unusually rowdy or difficult
Does he: - rever tolk about his children.
alk about his children as normal and appropriat
X..
frequently talk about his children.
seem quite preoccusied about his children
Are ally bitechide nippod in deformed rogual bro, lie.
No X
If yes; describe circumstances:
-48-00
---
## Page 271
14.02
14:0g
14.04
14.05
14.06
When his wife and family are awoy, he is:
obviously very lonely and of loose ends
unlikely to vary his routine
likely. to become more.active.and socially aggressive
have no idea
As a futher, he is best describad ou
_An active, happy family man who is proud of his family.
" An active family man who is inclined to be strict and
demanding with his children.
• An active family man who spends a great deal of time with his
family. He tends to spoil his children.
¿ An active but insecure family main who worries a good deal
about his children.
An active, responsible father; but hos a no-norisense ottitude.
His work comes first and his fumily knows it:
i A careful, responsible father who is conscientious about his.
family but not particularly warm or demonstrative.
X.. A carefree father who takes his family for grunted. Nost of the
time they fend for themselves and do a pretly good job of it.
family:
_An indifferent father, who sométimes seems oblivious of his
None of these fit, he is best described ast
Does he carry pictures of his fomily wife_ children
himself
In his office or room, does he display pictures of his family
• wife
children himself
Is there anything about his relotions with wife of family that requires
special mention or description?
-49 m
---
## Page 272
VI. IDEOLOGICAL SET
15. Genero
15.01
In general:
He'is a man with forthright and obvious opinions: He is copable
of expressing these opinions with little apparent regard for the
feelings and orleudes of oshers.
He is a man with many prejudices and dogmatic ideas. He con:
express them with heat and determination when necessary.
He is a man who is likely to turn aside controversial opinions
with flippancy or humor. It is sometimes difficult to determine
his opinions because it is hard to get him. really serious.
He is a man who.may. have.many.strong opinions but it is difficult
for him io show them. He is opologetic, diffident and often
uncomfortable: when an argument is in the offing.
He is o man whose true opiniors are difficult to determine. He
istusually diplomatic and conventional when controversial subjects.
or haboo subjects are discussed:
He is a man vito is serious and determined to be proper and :
conventional: He has the manner of a well disciplined person who
only says what he is supposed to say of expected to say.
He is'a man who has quite sophisticated opinions. He is well read,
"capable of considerable articulate orgument, but at times can be
quite cynical, or subtlely sarcastic:
He is o man who is shy or taciturn about his opinions: It is
very hard to get him to open up on any subject, particularly
if it is controversial.
Noreof these fit, he is best described as:
-50-
---
## Page 273
1d-0d0
15:01,00
15.02
15.02.01
Is there any subject.that tends to get his dander up?
If so; what is it?
Yes. No:
is he a man whose patriotism.
is obvious and intense
is like that of most of his colleagues
is guarded önd not too intense
is difficult to determine
•Ön general political issues, is he:
unusually well informed on his country's position and attitudes
as informed as most of his colleagues:
unusually poorly informed
-51-
---
## Page 274
MEDICAL
16.01
State of Health:
To your knowledge, does he love any sort of health problem?
Yes_ NoX
if Yes, pleose explain:
16.02
Does he wite or children have any on of heal problem a X No
If Yes, please explain:
wite =
16:03
Has he ever indicated that he had health problems in the past?
If Yes, please explains
No X
16.01
To your krowledge, does he regularly take pills or medication of ony kinu?
Yes " No K
"if Yes, please explain:
16.05
13.06
Is he the kird of person who: Never talks about his health. or how he
Talks about his health and feelings to an average degree
Frequently talks about his health and feelings
ger ho feel a rie out to are - brians to on orga
1o feel bad
=52=
---
## Page 275
16.07
16:08
16:09
In appearance, he looks Robust and healthy
X. Essentially like most
peaple his oge
Unheolthy :
-Does he have A flushed face.
breathe hard with exertion
"Cold clot bellind
A tendendy to
to sweat to any unusual degree
Foul breath
To: your knowledge, does he odhere to a special diet or health regimen?
Yes
No
If Yes, pleose explain:
16.10
16.1
As an overall impression, does he strike you os à person who is
Highly energetic and tireless.
Energetic; but in spurts
Moderately energetic
Lethargic, listless
Is there onything about the state of his health or his fomily's health
¡hat warrants further comment?
53
---
## Page 276
floria-
Clore Pient 7 Valentin Lobinou
Sone: LIREALM-1
Fili
p-11712
---
## Page 277
de 1848
i76g,
140
filio de 1968
17 4,
Valentin togenon
, Mendinitong
simpli.. Talena
non la copert.
41969
séte siR aude
147-11,712
---
## Page 278
14-000
files
Calente f! Laguinan
Terceo aFecretario de la Emplejortes de la M1. R. 8. S.
Cineno do lre 11:94.56:5)
15.60-45
fiven ti bicame 1 m ca 21 Der
1966 Gy tobinou-logran via
p-11712
---
## Page 279
State
Feltinating
-Mice-
ander 1968
8. DaC 1800- ISKS, SiDj's 019168
mo. C/O artred at siaj's office mila suby vas on 11s say cour to the
street to met valentin logino: sto had colled dy phone to ast subj to step
costs to the street.
It.
turned cut that all loginow uas interested in uns to
subj tro tichots for sha
saila: for 9 Dacinder.
loginor stingly asked
sid if he had gone to ha main of the cuo presidents at in corder and
sidy rajoinad.tlat he didn' nois cht masting dut would de on hend for the
tamiry over of tha Charisad. /Corrent; the C/0 ins not anare of any Soulet
initering about as he entered suajis building!
2.
Sury reported that Alexards Prikhodho had dropped in to the office
narractedly on 9 Dac, but dos. crevented from calking to SubJ Soccuse Subj'g
mife and son vare
chare. Fitsodko esked when re could haré lunch with isubj,
ard-susy told him to will nax; suet, but that he ung terrldly dusy during the
Christmas rushi
The C/O too% the opportunity de inpress. on sudj cgain tha! he. uas to do
thirs, absolutely nothing, for the sourees.
doen ty the sonio's only wanted
to tron about charged visa requircients for traval tri latin-Ararica - 5udJ was
not to sive then the tina of day,
Io. C/0 brought up. she subject of Jacodo zabludorsty's maniton to
SUDJ.Of
characridts interest in aldistiro the support of influentic. verg
in his bid
-for the presidancy, and asked if subj had heard anything furiter on thla.
sasj said ino:"
But re related
the story coath for the. C/o:
Fact in Octobar 1955 Echernria tos attending a conference de nich subf.
present.
Echeverpla
cane down off the phesialum directly to subjes table
and greeted hin.
suby related
this to asslodorts, and it was then that rasiuoosky told
susy that ichevarria had goten to lin and said he Jesls he to a strong candidaço
fe for the presidency, and mould like to rave a connittes of fibe gople in the
FF-Nr66
vertsh community to coondirate with it.
zabludoushy told susy he
22202
to propose subj:. Tabludoroty dic not nine any others.
The C/O asked Subj sho
ho coucht sore of the other itkely deutsh leaders
suby sole it lag hard so say, but he nored tro:.
Kictarteldman, o
anter and ferrando Jara; the Recd' oi Binal B'rith.
The C/O asked suay to chact tier tabludodoty on the whole matior agalr, uhen
hod the opportunity. Subj suid la could do 30.
53J 89
intendirg to tate e too day trip to colomblo, outrer 9 or 10 Dec,
correction with the Feirolera Congress.
CARDED
File ec
f-11712
82270
P-7724
PRU
P-5530
5530
P. 2712
---
## Page 280
1d-0000
sources terroy/
locide a
9 Doc. 1988.
Thie was sent to lirana by Ilenvoy/?.
The laot commont pertains to Casaaadrid'e
(former) assdolation with tho ¿ogal Attache!8
office, posalbig but i don't kno how Idenvoy/2
know of this.
some.
sator to
kid seri
obile the
-F1le88
CarLos CASARADRID (
- 4-1698
"ces Carlos BLANCO
•COB. LOQUINOV
117.1'
c0 8 50-8-75/2
co: 50-8-75/4
---
## Page 281
14-0000
Coneraje
22° 60105-1000 Enclano 8 au
471i0 ol Vicosaou trist
sin no sen para pandonde tratan dicoria que acaba do recrear
de un vando a tineln. 100301 110aàa no cajoda todirlo un poco
dnllóida"y
jabasrio por la noche en plego piro vorue y para allo lo puode
12umor al 37-36-93 sun do un acroedo do du tornano y alli puode
digir al rucado o bios in au is'élna quo on ol: 35-11-27 ext-112.
NOTAS EL
to:85.13 17-26011 ce yaporde a una tlapalesia ubicado
on
la coleada forraten Fi30D;
E1
teldirno 35-12-07. 10 1l contados del cdsfloto 4110
EL 6 dO diCIenrO dO 10G6, CARLOS BLANCO SAludO a LOQUINOY
y dico quos
"El couardante Culos, Elono urconois por looulisar
PAVCL INTRECE".
Lica tal ricurin quo sio entãe puro que dojó
dicho dondo poderio lliuia liCO que al 10-13-62 o o la Guardia
de siganizan qui arn al 21-21-03 y 23-28-10 y que le alen qué o
uncanto j que pude lLama a la Mori que ruato, guas "yanos a
Đo tur. de
MuAlla" 1U6TINUV Do 10 dirl para jua loo Llone & las
ocho y modio de ln sochu liliCo nota de acuodo y prácuntas ..
"jun pasio con di abunto
oce da coron de lo Dollos Artos 9"
Loor contestas
dicos
axos ontonces adioso"
(NOTA, LOS tOlUTCHOs rencIonados cortosjorion al surundo cOsa
danto y Quadia do Mienta de la policla Judicial dol:
o dicl0l.20 909 29660.
CARLOS DENCO SALINO pUedO LOS lU rilunA pOreOna quios datuvo
coolulosado por la pirocalla redural de Socuridad Junto don
CARLES CASIJAPNID MINii: ip en cirudelo on la Embajada do 20s
Eatados Unt:ose
8-10.968.
---
## Page 282
MADE
Mise
war 4)
SUBJECT®
Contact Disport /LICOZY - P- 2712
22 Docender 1950
22 DOC 1153-1245, 5ud1'3.01f1c0
3
The C/O dropped by Subj's office on 22 Doc, after hauing delluered a
Chilatmas alfe of liquor to subj's home the previous day.
subj was very apprectatiod of the gift.
suisy proved che C/o the reservation card for travel of soulet Georgi vioro
and ilo Jambly, Nino, Irina and farina..
They're bookod for departure from lexico
for. 25 Dic Dy Alr France, Jor: Parla..
"Jarls to Brussois, uhere Viako has jour dajo
of buntreas, and continuing flight Brussels to loscoin on 30 December.
Vlako had olatted subf in company with another sbobot who subd uas told was
de la Imbajade Sovletica.
3.
suby stated
that he hod receive
lotter from Sidney Neintraud, U.S. State
Dopartmert.offlclal.now in Chile, inulting.sudg to visit him.
formeriy atatloned in Mexico and later In Mashington was the nubject of intorest
by the Soulate ln Mexico,.
who had suby try to maintain contact on his Hashington
tripol: Please, foruand theo information to Gerald I. Gestatner in partlalin. "/
4.
subf orld he had recelved a firm Inultation from Mr. Haunlus (phonetic),
öf Alr France In Mexico, to go on the Inaugural flight of Air France to Red China,
posalbly bri Aprll 1907.
subj wis complatoly neutral about hla going, but askod
the c/o.lf wa had any Interest in his taking the trip to fed Cheno..
The C/O sald
me. would let him 'know about that..
3.
ine C/O äsked subj to have the door to ris. offlce closed, do that wa itort
dlacuas a serfous matter.
C/o sald he wanted to explore frankly the status
of subj's relationship toward. tha soulets: The C/O stated. bluntly that there
wag. a feeling
higher ups that subj had not achloved a sufflotent degree of
cut-ods from the soulets, and that his posture of friendly compromise
hts alanco:
In reply, subf mentloned the tuo alements that went into rus
attitude toward
a) re the financlal gain from assoclading with them, subf sald that had fallen
to
such an inatontficant. level: that tt had no effect in htg dealings wlth the
Soulets.
And he: adid that level would sint even more when the souleta inaugurate
derojiot. fllghts..rom d'ontreal
and New York (the Soulets do not handle bookings
on Aeröflot.
through agente).
b) Nts personallty (the C/O had agtod l It were posstole for suby to become cool
or even unfriendly touard the soulets); Suby sald he
could not charge his
In the past year he had cooled off noticeably, having realsted all
cooperation ulth them, avolded them, put alf/lcultles in the way of meetings, ete
•But it was against his graln to be unfrlendly toward people ilth whom he might
be thrown into assoctation..
He cited proudly that he was not beholden to the
soolets for anything; and never went out of his ray to seat anything from them;
for tristarce, he had been told that Paval Yatstoo had brought back carlar for
(schem, and 11.Yatskoo .colla him, he will see him and cannot understand how he
could be wifriendly to Yatskou under such circumstances).
Tre C/O mentioned to subj the latteris equivocal reply of umaybe" when
Loginow had asted ly Suby would report the nons of the CIA chief la Mexico 1f
subs replied that he had told loginod that the latter was crasy
File: cc: P-8017 (p1)
f-11712
P- 11668. (p. 1)
---
## Page 283
SIBUECI OF VOCINENE
-CRET
Folled day
DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE
OCCUMEAT
IDENTIFICATION
RI FILE NO.
OISPATON DA
sOvaca doc.
LOGINOV, Valentin
SYMBOL
DATE
7. SOURCE CRTPICHTULE. DATE OF INFO.
EVALUATION
DATE PROCESSED
10. OFSSEWIGATEDIN
DATE.
,CROSS REFERREO TO THIS FILE.
DOCUMENT CISPOSITION
ID=. TRAASFERREO TO
RI TILE 4O.
PERTINENT INFORMATLON
Lista del Cuerop Diplomatico, Abrx] 1963, (Cuban) Ministerio de
Relaciones Exteriores
Attache, Sovemb Havana-- Valentin S. LOGINOV (LOGUINOV)
Aleksandra LOGINOVA, wife ( DE LOGUINOV)
Address: Havana-Vedado, Paseo # 309, apto 4-B
APOROYED FOR RELEASE 1992
CIR BISTORICAL REYEW PROCRAN
001.585412
FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.
7 867
use
(9- 46}
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10193-10033.pdf | 104-10193-10033 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 06/22/1961 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CARACAS | DIRECTOR | CABLE RE MESSAGE TO BE PUT INTO COVER LETTER AND MAILED. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-28 : F2 : 20040310-1056699 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10193-10033
RETURNTO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
•+==
1658
CLAS: = iMESSAGE
EXt
DATE
80
CONS.
INFO:
1O
235S
33 v123 2961
"1-95A5
DIRECTOR
BELL 10
COP, ADOP/A, WH 5, S/C 2
CARA
INFO
Л.ZD
23-13
23 JUN51 22
23z
CITE DIR
DERING EN
ROUTINE
CUT59361
•OUT 69661
4,7608
PIS FUT FOLLO: TE INTO SW IRITS COVER LETTER ALD IAIL TO AURE- 1]
"ISSAGE NUNBER ONE: FOR FELIPE. HE GREATZY APPRECIATE YOUR TAKIIG
you
OVER I I OPERATIO:S FROT SAIQUE. AD'ISS IS NESD ATTITIG AND WE
MILL SEID BY LEXT COURIER.
WE HAVE NUMBER YOUR LIFES BAiK ACCOUNT
ADITI BRUIN MONT.-LY DSPOSITS $200. USE SECEET URITING OFTEN
A D RADIO ONLY IF ¡ESSAGS URGENT. TELL PACO LE VERY INTEREJTED
RECE UIT INFORIANT I: LOVI INTO RIVOLUCIONARIO DEI. PUESID. NE
FREPARING 'FORMATIO: REPORTING GUIDES FOR ALL NEVBERS YOUR GROUP
A'D NILI. SEND IN IIT SI LESSAGE. ADVISE OF ANY NE: EXECUEIONS
I'CUITINO INE TITY VICTE'S.*
END OF MESSAGE
Comert:
fellne 1s"510J1 who took over maragement of the intel not
:/4/PROP
K. lul
s. c. KIx/re
C/-D
ASINO CAPICIO
0/: 11/1 F2 ustin
hi!/copr
Matte
COOCOINGINE ORIGIR
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
03
R. K. DAVISO
c/: 7/4
AUTHENTICATINO ORVICED
Copy to.
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10335-10009.pdf | 104-10335-10009 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 06/17/1996 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | PROJFILES-ARRB REQUESTS | ARRB REQUEST - CIA-1 | 13 | ARRB | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK-M-19 : F10 : 2000.02.16.09:26:40:280044 : UNIT INDEX | 13 | ## Page 1
1104-70335-10009
1110.9
Assassination Records Review Board
600 E Street NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20530
(202) 724-0088 - Fax: (202) 724-0457
11115
June 17, 1996
Mr. John Pereira
Director
Historical Review Group
Center for the Study of Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 20505
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR
RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION
IN THIS DOCUMENT
Re: ARRB Request for Additional Information and Records No. CIA-10
Dear John:
Pursuant to its authority under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records
Collection Act of 1992, the Assassination Records Review Board requests that you
provide us with descriptive information regarding the "Interagency Source Register"
cited in the attached document.
Would you please explain the principal function of the Interagency Source Register and
provide some basic background information, including when it began functioning, the
purpose for which was created, which entity or entities in the intelligence community
were responsible for operating it, and which entity or entities in the intelligence
community made use of it. To the extent that the Register may have been discontinued
during the 1958-1965 period, we would like to know why and what type of system
replaced it (if any).
In addition, would you please identify the documents to which you refer in drafting
your response.
This request should be interpreted in its broadest reasonable sense. To the extent that
you are not certain whether certain information comes under the scope of this request,
please let us know and we can advise you whether we seek to include it. Should this
request impose an unreasonable burden on you that we may have not anticipated,
please advise us so that we can work with you to modify or amend the request
accordingly.
BOARD MEMBERS: John R. Tunheim, Chair • Henry F. Graff • Kermit L. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson
---
## Page 2
13-00000
: .
KI6
Assassination Records Review Board
600 E Street NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20530
(202) 724-0088 • Fax: (202) 724-0457
11:1
June 17, 1996
Mr. John Pereira
Director
Historical Review Group
Center for the Study of Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 20505
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR
RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION.
IN THIS DOCUMENT
Re: ARRB Request for Additional Information and Records No. CIA-10
Dear John:
Pursuant to its authority under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records
Collection Act of 1992, the Assassination Records Review Board requests that you
provide us with descriptive information regarding the "Interagency Source Register"
cited in the attached document.
Would you please explain the principal function of the Interagency Source Register and
provide some basic background information, including when it began functioning, the
purpose for which was created, which entity or entities in the intelligence community
were responsible for operating it, and which entity or entities in the intelligence
community made use of it. To the extent that the Register may have been discontinued
during the 1958-1965 period, we would like to know why and what type of system
replaced it (if any).
In addition, would you please identify the documents to which you refer in drafting
your response.
This request should be interpreted in its broadest reasonable sense. To the extent that
you are not certain whether certain information comes under the scope of this request,
please let us know and we can advise you whether we seek to include it. Should this
request impose an unreasonable burden on you that we may have not anticipated,
please advise us so that we can work with you to modify or amend the request
accordingly.
BOARD MEMBERS: John R. Tunheim, Chair • Henry F. Graff • Kermit L. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: David G. Marwell
---
## Page 3
13-00000
Mr. John Pereira
June 17, 1996
Page 2
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Rion
David G. Marwell
Executive Director
Enclosure
---
## Page 4
13-00000
143
177 ORATIDUM FOR:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
SEGRET
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
WASHINGTON 25. D.C.
CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
JELEASE IN FOLI
ssistant Chiei 0200991, Intelligenc
Departuent of the Army
Attention:
Plans and Operations Branch
Interagency Source Zegister
Burn lotice - lens Dieter KAiLiSI
1 3 UGH: 1665
:
1. Subject Individual is suspected of being a mentally
disturbed Intelligence nuisance. It is requested that this office
be furnished any Infornation your office can make availeble which
night support or deny this suspicion, plus any own biographical
Infornation not Included In the attached report.
2. The attached Information concerning Subject is forwarded
for purposes of identification.
3. Reply by 1 July 1966 would be appreciated. Legative reply
may be telephoned using the correspondence file number of this
menorandum for reference.
ISRAI-23,279
Att: a/s para 2
CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM
Release In Full 1996
іКі'-r?7T
Reply telephoned te nice 29 a.
12
SFARFT
Exciadat Y
01sadt2e and
1- 147e
4° гáAя
---
## Page 5
13-00000
ADMINISTRATIVE
AL USE ONLY
21. June 1996
CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
RELEASE IN FOLL
2000
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Fred Wickham
DO Focal Point for
JFK Board Requests
FROM:
SUBJECT:
John F. Pereira
Chief,
Historical Review Group
JFK Board Request No. CIA-10
Interagency Source Register
1.. Attached is request No. CIA-10, dated June 17, 1996
from the Assassination Records Review Board.
The request is
for information regarding the "Interagency Source Register",
which is cited in an attached document.
this
2.
Please advise how you would like us to respond to
request.
All hosin
John
F. Pereira
Attachments
ATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY
---
## Page 6
13-00000
ADMINISTRATIVE
ITERNAL USE ONLY
21 June 1996
CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
RELEASE IN FULL
2000
MEMORANDUM FOR: Fred Wickham
DO Focal Point for
JFK Board Requests
FROM :
John F. Pereira
Chief,
Historical Review Group
SUBJECT:
JFK Board Reguest No. CIA-10
Interagency Source Register
1. Attached is request No. CIA-10, dated June 17. 1996
from the Assassination Records Review Board.
The request is
for information regarding the "Interagency Source Register",
which is cited in an attached document.
2.
Please advise how you would like us to respond to
this request.
Oh bacina
John F. Pereira
Attachments
INISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONE%
---
## Page 7
13-00000
Mr. Barry Harrelson
October 7, 1996
Page 2
which will be processed as an assassination record. Gunn will then
determine whether there are any additional portions of the history that
should be added to the Blakey version. CIA will compile the "Blakey
version" as soon as possible and Gunn will promptly thereafter review the
documents.
Index. CIA has made an index available to Review Board staff and the
stat his iment ava ertain histories rie may ate apprise or reces and
will raise with Review Board staff any questions regarding the requests
where the basis for the request is unclear. CIA will begin to make
histories available on a rolling basis. Review Board has agreed to review
histories promptly once they are made available. Although it was not
discussed at our meeting, we would very much appreciate it if you would,
within the next two weeks, identify which histories you are prepared to
make available and those that CIA believes should be subject to further
discussions.
Cram's multi-volume counterintelligence history. Although Cram's
history was not specifically discussed at our meeting, the Review Board
staff understands that the history has been located and the Review Board
staff awaits its being made available.
CIA-8 (Intelligence community staff)
CIA will provide a report to the Review Board staff within two weeks.
CIA-9 (Publications and analytical materials)
The Review Board staff provided CIA with a list of certain publications as
they appear in an LBJ Library finding aid. CIA will report back on
recommended action to the Review Board promptly.
CIA-10 (Interagency source register)
CIA has compiled information responsive to the request. CIA will make
(cord available within two weeks.
CIA-11 (Duran's original statement)
---
## Page 8
13-00000
Mr. Barry Harrelson
October 27, 1996
Page 2
Other Histories. No response has been received to our agreement that
CIA identify within two weeks the histories that can be made available
and those that should be subject to further discussions.
CIA-8 (Intelligence community staff)
CIA had promised to provide a report to the Review Board within two
weeks. Nothing has been made available.
CIA-9 (Publications and analytical materials)
We have received no materials responsive to this request. Additionally,
no response has be received from CIA regarding the list of publications
that are identified in an LBI Library finding aid that the Review Boarc
staff provided.
CIA-10 (Interagency source register)
CIA has not yet made available the records that it had agreed to provide
within two weeks. (was Oswald on)
CIA-11 (Duran's original statement)
CIA has agreed to make some further attempts to locate Duran's original
statement.
CIA-12 (MWAVE materials)
CIA has agreed to make materials available on a rolling basis.
Informal requests:
Spas Rankin. CIA has made the Spas Rankin file available to the Review Board.
review board staft research continues. When research is complete, staft wil
discuss issues with CLA
files fuum collection pulled /warten
ARRIS stat
reureu
IN 23738. CIA is searching for cable number IN 23738 (7 July 1962). = Copy seat
Marilyn Murrett. CIA has made the Marilyn Murrett file available to the Review •
' Board. Review Board staff research continues. When research is complete, staff
---
## Page 9
13-00000
CIHRG
CONFIDENTIAL
20 February 1997
Mr. T. Jeremy Gunn
General Counsel
Assassination Records Review Board
600 E Street, NW
Washington, D. C. 20530
Re: (U) ARRB Request for Additional Information and
Records No. CIA-10 (Interagency Source Register)
Dear Jeremy:
(U) This is in response to Mr. David Marwell's letter
of 17 June 1996 to Mr. John Pereira, in which he asked ‹
number of questions concerning the
"Interagency Source
Register"; specifically,
a. What is the function of the register?
b. When did it begin?
c. What are the purposes of the register?
d. Which entity or entities are responsible for
operating the register?
e. Which entity or entities in the intelligence
community have made use of it?
f. To the extent it fell into disuse during the
period 1958-1965, what, if any, system replaced
it?
(C) Please find enclosed for your review DO Instruction
"The Interagency Source Register." This
three-page instruction fully answers questions a, cy and d
above. With respect to question e, at this time I know of
no way of determining exactly which entities within the
intelligence community made use of the register.
It can be
assumed that all such agencies knew about it and used it to
some extent.
With respect to b and f, we will continue to
search for data which will provide answers. We request that
the enclosure be returned when the Staff completes its
deliberations on this issue.
CL BY:
611637
CL REASON: 1.5(c)
DECL ON:
X1
DRV FROM: PER 10-82
CONFIDENTIAL
---
## Page 10
13-00000
..
. *
CONFIDENTIAL
call
me at you have any questions in this regard, please
Sincerely,
=Banatan
Barry Harrelsor
Enclosure:
As stated
CONFIDENTIAL
---
## Page 11
13-00000
CONFIDENTIAL
DCI /CSI/HRG : JBH/GMB/bkh (20
Distribution:
Orig - Adse w/enc
- HRG File w/o enc
1 - ARRB Request File w/enc
- DO (Fred Wickham) w/o enc
- JFK/DO
1 - Barry w7o enc
|| w/enc
CONFIDENTIAL
---
## Page 12
13-00000
CONFIDENTIAL
Central Intelligence Agency
14. 8. 48
Washington, D.C. 20505
13 August 1998
Ms. Laura Denk, Esquire
Executive Director
Assassination Records Review Board
•600 E Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
Dear Ms. Denk:
Reference: (C) ARRB Request No. CIA-10, for information
on the Interagency Source Register
(U) The following is responsive to referent request.
(C) The Interagency Source Register (ISR) is simply a
device whereby agencies within the intelligence community
which recruit or deal with sources of foreign positive
intelligence outside the United States try to keep from
no bara states
bumping into each other in the pursuit of such information.
It is for the further purpose of ensuring a source cannot
gain an unwarranted advantage by dealing with more than one
agency.
Each agency is responsible for registering an
individual as a source with the ISR before using the
individual.
(C) The ISR was established in 1957 by the Intelligence
Advisory Committee, predecessor to the U.S. Intelligence
Board.
The ISR was not used extensively during the years
1958-1965 and we know of no system or procedure which took
its place.
(C) The first ISR regulations were in the form of
basic procedures each agency was to follow, procedures which
have gone through a number of reiterations.
ARRB staff
members have reviewed the classified, current written
instruction governing the existence and use of the ISR.
CL BY:
(0611637)
CL REASON: 1.5 (C)
DECL:
X1
DRV FROM: Per 10-82
CONFIDENTIAL
---
## Page 13
13-00000
CONEIDENTIAL
Ms. Laura Denk, Esquire
(U)
I believe that this information is fully
responsive to your request on the ISR and accordingly,
completes our work on CIA-10.
Sincerely,
J. Barry Harrelson
2
CONFIDENTIAL
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10104-10093.pdf | 104-10104-10093 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 5/2/67 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | OGC, CIA | AC/WH/COG | PROSECUTION OF CUBANS IN MIAMI, FLORIDA. | 2 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK37 : F2 : 1993.07.22.15:02:15:180620 : 2 COPIES | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10104-10093|
C06067-0840
S125
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
WH/COG 67-185
2 MAY 1967
MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of General Counsel
ATTENTION
SUBJECT
: Mr. John K. Greaney
: Prosecution of Cubans in Miami, Florida
1.
Reference your request dated 27 April 1967 on the
possible association of the Cubans who are being charged
with violation of Arms Control Act, conspiracy and the
according to our files with the exception
none of the men cited were ever
associated with this Agency.
2.
review of our records on Orlando BOSCH y Avila
has revealed the following information:
An Operational
Approval was requested by the Miami Station on 29 January
1962 to utilize him as an External Coordinator for an
infiltration group in Cuba.
The Approval was granted on
6 March 1962.
He was afforded technical interrogation in
the Miami area in May
1962 and successfully answered all
pertinent questions without any indications of deception.
However, it was decided not advisable to continue our
relationship with him; therefore, his approval was cancelled
on 9 November 1962.
There was never any electronic
surveillance employed against BOSCH.
In December 1966 he
was tried and acquitted of extortion in Miami.
During the
trial
he stated he planned to sue CIA, FBI, and Customs for
one million dollars because of damage to his reputation.
3. Miami Station commented
that the effects of the
BOSCH Group trial could be similar to that of the Masferrer
trial.
(Please see
• attachment.)
C/YA/COG
Attachment
Er2222 12210 1)
KKI
---
## Page 2
SECRET
C066.67-0840.
WH/COG 67-185
2 MAY 1967
MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of General Counsel
ATTENTION
SUBJECT
: Mr. John K. Greaney
: Prosecution of Cubans in Miami, Florida
1. Reference your request dated 27 April 1967 on the
possible association of the Cubans who are being charged
with violation of Arms Control Act, conspiracy and the
Neutrality. Act, according to our files with the exception
nore ever
of Orlando BOSCH y Avila, none of the men cited were ever
associated with this Agency.
A review of our records on Orlando BOSCH y Avila
revealed the following information:
An Operational
Approval was requested by the Miami Station on 29 January
1962 to utilize him as an External Coordinator for an
infiltration group in Cuba.
The Approval was granted on
6 March 1962.
He was afforded technical interrogation in
the Miami area in May 1962 and successfully answered all
pertinent questions without any indications of deception.
However, it was decided not advisable to continue our
relationship with him; therefore, his approval was cancelled
on 9 November 1962.
There was never any electronic
surveillance employed
against BOSCH. In December 1966 he
was tried and acquitted of extortion in Miami.
During the
trial he stated he planned to sue CIA, FBI, and Customs for
one million dollars because of damage
to his reputation.
3.
Miami Station commented that the effects of the
BOSCH Group trial could be similar to that of the Masferrer
trial. (Please see attachment.)
TAL/WH/COU
Attachment
APT
Exceed in suleatie
KK1
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32291640-1.pdf | 124-10207-10416 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 02/24/1977 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 2-2173-1ST NR 237 | DIRECTOR, FBI | LEG, CAR | 3 | FBI | HQ | 02/18/2018 | 3 | ## Page 1
JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD_NUMBER: 124-10207-10416
RECORD SERIES: HO
AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 2-2173-1ST NR 237
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM:
LEG. CAR
TO: DIRECTOR. FBI
TITLE:
DATE: 02/24/1977
PAGES: 3
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENT_ TYPE:
ORIGINAL
CLASSIFICATION:
REVIEW DATE:
STATUS
PAPER. TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
Secret
03/17/1997
Redact
NEW
CLASSIFICATION:
UPDATE DATE:
RESTRICTIONS:
JFK Act 6 (4)
COMMENTS:
---
## Page 2
SECRET
CAR, 2-14
By State Department telegram 2/11/77, Legat respondea
"I.
The following information was provided to Legat by a confi-
dential source, who has provided reliable information in the past‹
qualified homicide and use and manufacture of weapons of
Posada is currently in custody in Caracas awaiting trial(5)
"3.
In all likelihood, Posada will not be released from custody
until all judicial proceedings have been completed in Venezuela.
le is now a naturalized Venezuelan citizen, and cannot be extra-
lited to another country unless stripped of his Venezuelan citizen-
ship, which can entail a lengthy judicial process, and is not likely
"4. Information concerning any weapons seized at the time of
Posada's arrest is not immediately available:
nor are copies of his
passport.
Any items sezea in connection with his arrest are in the
custody of the court, and are
ordinarily available until comple-
tion of judicial proceedings. (S
"'5. ANDRES DOMINGUEZ, SERGIO DIEGUEZ, and HECTOR ROBLEDO are un-
known to source 3)
"6. Source knows ERNESTO BIONDI as a private citizen, residing
in Caracas, and who has many friends in police and government
circles in
Venezuela.
He has a brother who is an executive of
roctor and Ganble in Venezuela
ernan weapons firm doing business in venezuela (ate
with a
"7.
CARLOS FABBRI holds the rank of Sub-Comisario in the Venezuelan
Directorate of Intelligence and Preventive Services (DISIP), and
is
in charge of the DISIP Explosives Demolition Squad. Fabbri
has
traveled to the United States on a number of occasions, and has
purchased handguns in Miami through a U.S.-citizen intermediary.
These handguns were delivered to various police officials in
altered to
Venezuela for whom they were purchased by Fabbri.
He has
also
purchased arms directly from the Smith and Wesson factory through
official channels. (g)
- 2 -
ACCRED
2-2173-N22/24177
---
## Page 3
SECRET
CAR 2-14
"8. RAFAEL PARRA is an employee of Viasa Airlines
in Caracas, and
travels occasionally to the United States.
he has many friends in
law enforcement and military circles in Venezuela, and, through a
U. o. citizen, purchased firearms in the United States
for
venezuelan military oificers and police officials.g)
"9. MANUEL ENRIQUE HIDALGO YANEZ worked for DISIP until about
three or four years ago.
At that time, he lost a hand in an
explosion while dismantling a bomb at the Centro Venezolano
Americano in Caracas.
He underwent extensive medical treatment
at George Washington Hospital in Washington, D. C.
Since his dis-
ability, he has not worked for DISIP, but continues to have many
friends
in DISIP and in the Venezuelan military.
He is not known
by source
to have purchased firearms in the United States since his
injury. (g)
The Bureau is requested to authorize the Miami Office to
contact U.S. Customs at Miami for further details in this matter,
and to determine if a violation of the Neutrality Act exists.
For the information of the Bureau and Miami, CARLOS
FABBRI, who holds the rank of Sub-Comisario at DISIP,
Caracas:
is a Legat contact, and is the confidential source referred to
above. $ (3)
- 3
-
SECRED
2-2173NK 2/24/77
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32290952-1.pdf | 124-10206-10228 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 08/24/1962 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 92-2781-599, 598 | DIRECTOR, FBI | SAC, TP | 4 | FBI | HQ | 3/6/18 | INC A/T | 4 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
6/11/201
AGENCY : FBI
RECORD NUMBER : 124-10206-10228
RECORD SERIES :
HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
92-2781-599, 598
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM: SAC, TP
TO:
DIRECTOR, FBI
TITLE :
DATE :
'PAGES:
SUBJECTS :
08/24/1962
4
LST, ASSOC, BUSS
DOCUMENT TYPE:
PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION :
Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS : 4
CURRENT STATUS : Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW:
10/13/1998
OPENING CRITERIA :
INDEFINITE
COMMENTS :
INC A/T
t.
v9.1
46
---
## Page 2
FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-56)
FBI
Date:
8/31/62
(Type in plain text or code)
(Priority or Method of Mailing)
Transmit the following in
Via
AIRTEL
AIRMAIL
TO:
FROM:
SANTO
AR
DIRECTOR, FBI (92-2781)
SAC, TAMPA (92-1) (P)
TRAFFICANTE, JR., aka
Re my airtel, 8/24/62.
WEEKLY AIRTEL SUMMARY
On 8/29/62, Detectives WILLIAM WARREN and ROBERT COOK,
Orlando, Fla. PD, advised their office had covered the Pine Hills
Country Club the nights of 811 and 18/62.
They advised their
coverage determined that subject did not visit the club on either
evening and there has been no indication of his presence in Orlando,
Florida during recent months.
(It is noted that ROYCE EARL SIMMONS
had previously advised subject was to attend a meeting at the above
location on 8/11/62).
PCI DOMINICK LaROCA, Tampa, determined that individual ip
contact with JINVY LONGO, Tampa, driving 1956-58 Cadillac, bearing
1962 Florida license 3W-51546.
Above tag determined issued to KENNETH GUTHRIE, 4008 Talia-
ferro, Tampa.
Further investigation, Tampa, determined GUTHRIE employed
oy General Telephone Company,
Tampa,
and his photograph obtained
to be shown to PCI for positive identification.
Subject's 1959 Chevrolet Impala, 1962 Florida license 3W-
12736, has been observed at subject's Tampa residence since 8/29/62.
Sources and observation of subject's
residence failed to indicate
subject presently in Tampa. Subject's wife not observed at resi
dence.
a Wich
REC- Z
(3 - Bureau
1
- Miami
(92-88) (Info)
1
100.
- Tampa
92-228/599
FXO/ mw
(5)
12 SEP 3 1962
56548/503862
Approved:
Sent
M
Special Agent in Charge
---
## Page 3
TP 92-1
PCI MARIO CESAR CAPAZ, Tampa, has advised subject
has not been in Columbia
Restaurant, and subject's close
associate, JINMY LONGO, has not been in Restaurant since the
afternoon of 8/26/62.
No activity re subject or associates has been ob
served at St. Petersburg Beach residence.
Detective JACK DE LA LLANA, Intelligence Unit,
Tampa PD, advised his sources report subject continues resi-
dence in
Miami.
---
## Page 4
FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-56)
FBI
Date:
8/24/62
Transmit the following in
Via
AIRTEL
PLAIN TEXT
(Type in plain text or code)
AIR MAIL
(Priority or Method of Mailing)
TO:
DIRECTOR, FBI (92-2781)
FROM:
SAC, TAMPA (92-1 (P)
SANTO TRAFFICANTE, JR, aba.
AR
Remyairtel, 8/17/62.
WEEKLY AIRTEL SUMMARY
Dallas Office advised that PCI GEORGE FUQUA related
he and JAMES HENRY DOLAN, late 1960 or early 1961 went to
miami, Fla. and contacted MILO BELL.
was acquainted with both BELL and TRAFFICANTE and the purpose
of the contact was to see if BELL could use FUQUA and DOLAN in
the "collection business" or as enforcers for TRAFFICANTE.
According to informant, DOLAN contacted BELL through JOHNNY
WILLIAMS, an Italian from Boston.
PCI related BELL asked DOLAN and FUQUA if they were
interested in an armored car deal as BELL knew another person,
not identified, who had the necessary keys. TRAFFICANTE
was to get part of the "score" for protection he was
furnishing. FUQUA and DOLAN declined as it appeared too risky.
Informant continued that subsequently DOLAN and
roQuA, acting for BELL AND TRAFFICANTE, knocked off two
bolita men and obtained $7,000 from one of them.
t.
Bureau
2
-
Miami
1
- Tampa
?. FX0: cl
(6)
REC-21
92-2781-598
12
AUC 217 1962
EX-ING
Approved:
Sent
Per
Special Agent in Charge
---
## Page 5
TP 92-1
PCI related he was never in Tampa and alt his
contacts with BELL and TRAFFICANTE were in the Miami area.
Continued observation of subject's residence
and hangouts
subject not located
Tampa, during the past week, have determined
in the Tampa area.
PCI ANNIE MAY JACKSON advised 8/24/62 subject
not at his residence and only cars observed 2505 Bristol
are cars of subject's daughter, SARAH ANN and AUGIE PANIELLO.
LEAD:
MIAMI DIVISION
AT MIAMI, FLORIDA
Will check sources and files
WILLIAMS above.
to identify JOHNNY
2
t.
--
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10315-10015.pdf | 104-10315-10015 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 9/7/61 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | LA DIV WORK FILE | THE RECORD | WITHHELD | MEMO:CONSIDERATION OF THE CUBAN MATTER BY THE 5412 SPECIAL GROUP | 2 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK-WF05 : F2 : 1999.01.27.16:34:59:043120 : | 2 | ## Page 1
110410315100151.
TOP SEGRET
7 September 1961
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Consideration of the Cuban Matter by the 3412
Special Group
1. Attached are my detailed notes made while reading the
minutes of the Special Group yesterday. The 12 pp. paper that
paper purported to quote the minutes only with reference to the
strike force concept. (It should be replaced in the two WH/4
bound volumes of papers furnished the Taylor Committee, at
"Part FF.")
2. I call attention to the following new matters, which
suggests a number of points that should be reflected in my draft irri
report of 31 August 1961:
Al.
Parrott was the Assistant to DD/P for Executive
Branch Matters (DD/P/FBM). He not only acted as secretary of
Special Group, and briefed the DCI beforehand, but took an active
role in the discussions,
at least from time to time, i.e., at
meetings of 8/11, 9/1, 9/8 and 11/16. This introduces stil]
another non-operator echelon in the decision-making, between DCI
and Chief, WH/4.
b. These minutes show the extremely detailed reporting
by CIA to the Special Group and requests for approval of individual
operations, 1.e., individual air drops.
c. Note that the detailed reporting to the Special Grou
was almost always done by Bissell or Barnes, not by the DCI.
d. Note Adm. Burke's statement that Navy Ideas were to
have 50,000 U.S. military for intervention in Cuba. (3/14/60 meeting)
Query:
was this statement in the back of the minds of CIA operators
bathe Cuban Brigade was only a spearhead
considerable additional talk of overt intervention.
AJOF SECRET
---
## Page 2
13-00000
e. Note (8/25 meeting) reference to Barnes' assurances to
Macy of Budget that 1t would be "out of question" to mount an
invasion without participation of large numbers of disaffected
individuals within the country (Cuba).
I. The words "Special Discussion" e•g., 10/6 meeting,
DP/D
indicate in my notes discussions of sensitive Do/! activities (PIC).
They are described at length in the minutes, but I took no notes on
g. Note (11/3 meeting) State's suggesting that the three
top Cubans be assassinated.
h. Note CIA was conducting a re-evaluation of the entire
situation (which presumably led to the decision to go ahead with a
large brigade): Should we not ask Bissell whether any memoranda of
this re-evaluation are in existence?
1. There is reference to Cuba being on NSC agenda for early
November 1960. Should we inquire what was said at such NSC meeting?
j. Note Barnes' preposterous statement (12/5) that 600
troops (in invasion) would be just as useful as 3000.
k. It is clear that the pressures to get the Cuban trainees
out of Guatemala were considered by the Special Group to be real and
urgent.
Tar erece
3. Will IG and GD and RIBS please make" additsonal suggestions, for
Inclusion in draft report?
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10119-10061.pdf | 104-10119-10061 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 07/25/1969 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CHIEF, EUROPEAN DIVISION | CHIEF, PHYSICAL SECURITY DIVISION | MEMO ON OPEN SAFE SECURITY VIOLATION. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK43 : F18A : 1997.06.27.07:32:02:403106 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10119-10061
PUNFIULNIIHL
25 JUL 1969
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, European Division, DE/P :
SUBJECT
: Security Violation - Open Safe
HUNT, E. Howard
1. An investigation by this Office has determined that
Mr. E. Howard Hunt and Missl
I both assigned
to your Office, were responsible for an Open Safe security
violation which occurred on 15 July 1969.
2. The records of this Office indicate that:
a. Mr. Hunt has been charged with an Open Safe
security violation which occurred on 3 September 1968.
In view of the fact that there have not been two consec-
utive years without a violation since 3 September 1968,
this is to be considered Mr. Hunt's second security vi-
olation for administrative action as specified in Section
(e) of CIA Headquarters Regulation 10-1.
b. Missh.
03
Thas not been previously charged with
a security violation.
3. In accordance with the provisions of Headquarters
Regulation 10-1, it would be appreciated if this Office were
advised of the action taken in this case. The action should be
noted in the space provided for your convenience at the bottom
of the attached report, in this, in turn, forwarded to this
Office.
Att
Violation Report
Content thin
James W. McCord, Jr.
To cia, one, i see him, do
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
CONFIDENTIAL
Excleded from automatic
downgradiog and
declassification
3/50
Dalian?.
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10173-10015.pdf | 104-10173-10015 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 5/3/62 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CHIEF, SR DIVISION | DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SECURITY (INVEST | MEMO. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-9 : F10 : 1998.02.14.10:50:18:716031 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10173-10015
S-E-C-R-E-T
(When Pilled In)
MEMORANDUM FOR:
ATTENTION
FRON
Chief, SR Divialon
Deputy Direotor of Security (Investigations
and Operational Support )
_ sonatize -released
• lur 106
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10121-10239.pdf | 104-10121-10239 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 09/29/1966 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | SUBJECT'S SUPERVISOR IS A CURRENT GS-15 STAFF EMPLOYEE WHO EOD IN 1951. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK44 : F22 : 1997.09.22.20:38:12:653102 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10121-10239
SEUKLI
0-592 217
0-105343 - S:ouse
Subject's spouse is a current GS-9 staff employee who EOD in March 195c. H.D.
- 0-487250 - SR°S 308
Subject's SR's son was a
susser contract euployee at a C Agency facility for
1256. R.D.
0-48277 - 53
Subject's Sa 18 a current G5-10 staff employee who BOD 1a July 1951. H.D.
MORALES, David Sanchez - 0/C - 35418 - gupervisor
Subject's supervisor 18 a current GS-15 stail employee voo EOD In 1951. M.D.
0/0 - 44772 - 58
Bubject's SA le a current GS-12 staff earloyee who BOD In Apri 1951 HE Ille
contains un sas flag sheet dated 6 March 1256. No pertinent derogatory information.
0-38798 - SUPerViGOr
Subject's sujervisor is a current GS-15 staff emplogee who BOD in Serlember
19490 MaDe tensi
0-38123 - EUSerVIsOr
Sutject's supervisor is & current GS-it staff enzloyee who DOD in September
1049. N.D.
RETIRITO CIA
Baske.urd
Dog Only
Do Nol Reproduco
ä, Centecher 1kd
TiTi
SIZi: 115
SOCIET
62337 1
declaccification
1
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32279111.pdf | 124-10068-10015 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 11/25/1963 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 44-24016-166 | DIRECTOR, FBI | SAC, SA | 5 | FBI | HQ | 2/5/18 | 5 | ## Page 1
8/25/2014
JFK Full Results
National Archives and Records Administration
Kennedy Assassination Collection Full Results
Viewing/Ordering Information
Exit JFK
Back to Brief Results Back to Search
Hits 1-1 of 1
Hit 1 of 1
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : FBI
RECORD NUMBER :
124-10068-10015
RECORDS SERIES : HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 44-24016-166
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : FBI
FROM
SAC, SA
TO
: DIRECTOR,
FBI
TITLE : [No Titlel
DATE
: 11/25/1963
PAGES
5
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
SUBJECTS
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS
CURRENT STATUS
RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW
: 05/06/1996
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE
Audit history for this Record Identification Form
Hits 1-1 of 1
Back to Brief Results
Back to Search
National Archives and Records Administration
webmaster@nara.gov
Exit JFK
1/1
---
## Page 2
ON 4/5/97
• URGENT 11-25-63 5-50PM CST RDL
TO
-DIRECTOR AND SAC, DALLAS
FROM
SAC, SAN ANTONIO 144-7481
ie Coriat
JACK LEON RUBY, AKAO, LEE HARVEY OSWALD, AKA. DASH,
VICTIM DASH DECEASED, CRO 00 DALLAS.
RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SACS TODAY.
JOSEPH PA
ROSSI, REAL ESTATE, TWO THREE ONE MERCHANTILE
CONTINENTAL BUILDING, DALLAS, TEXAS, ON NOV. TWENTYFIVE
-INSTANT ADVISED SAS THOMAS W. CRAWFORD AND CLAY ZACHRY, JR.,
RIATE AGENCIES
OF.
AS FOLLOWS-
HE SAID THAT HE AND JACK RUBY, WHOSE REAL NAME IS
ADVISI
SLIP
RUBENSTEIN, WERE BOTH BORN AND REARED IN THE TWENTYFOURTH
WARD IN CHICAGO. HOWEVER, DID NOT KNOW EACH OTHER UNTIL
ABOUT ELEVEN YEARS AGO WHEN THEY MET IN DALLAS • RUBY
HAD THE SILVER SPUR CLUB AND LATER THE VEGAS CLUB. ROSSI
DOES NOT KNOW MANY OF RUBY-S FAMILY, BUT SAID THEY ARE JEWS
AND THAT JACK RUBY OBSERVES JEWISH RELIGIOUS CUSTOMS • ROSSI
KNOWS OF NO CONNECTION BETWEEN OSWALD AND RUBY. HE STATES
THAT RUBY IS HIGHLY EMOTIONAL AND HAS A HIGH TEMPER.
END PAGE ONE
:: 2040
213
REC 27/
44-24016-166
:33.5
DocId: 32279111 Page 2
---
## Page 3
. .
TAREE
PAGE FWO
CASE.
A SIMPLE AND EMOTIONAL MAN FOR OBTAINING JUSTICE IN THIS
FD THREE ZERO TWO FOLLOWS ON ABOVE.
SOURCES AI SAN ANTONIO, AUSTIN, WACO, TEMPLE AND PHARR,
TEXAS, HAD NO PERTINENI INFORMATION.
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION REPORT
SOURCES CONTACTED NEGATIVELY NOV. TWENTYFIVE INSTANT
AI SAN ANTONIO. PCI J. C. STEPHENSON, PROPRIETOR, S • P•
DRUG STORE AND NEWSTAND, SA SIX SIX FIVE DASH C, PCI
VANCE FO BORDELON, GAMBLER, PCI CAESAR J. FERRIS, CAFE
OWENER AND BARTENDER, FORMER SA FIVE SIX ZERO DASH C.
ABOVE CONTACTED BY SA BRUNO F. DREYER.
{(w)
CONTACTED BY SA JOHN RUSSELL GRAHAM. PCI PHILLIP
BORDONARO, TAVERN KEEPER, POI JACK PATRICK HANRATTY, GAMBLER,
PCI ROBERT S. YARRINGTON RETIRED GAMBLER.
FOLLOWING CONTACTED BY SA MORTON P. CHILES, JR. CAPTAIN
ROBERT ALLEN, VICE SQUAD, SAN ANTONIO PD AND CHECK OF VICE
END PAGE THREE
DocId: 32279111 Page 3
---
## Page 4
PAGE FOUR
SQUAD RECORDS, PCI VINCENT L. LOCICERO, PCI WADE HANSEN, ente
PCI HENRY CARTER, AND SA SIX SIX ZERO DASH C•
CONTACTED NEGATIVELY AT AUSTIN, TEXAS, BY SA H. T.
BURK. PCI MARY HALBOUTY, MANICURIST, FORMER POI MARION C.
QUOTE SONNY UNQUOTE PEARSON, GAMBLER, FORMER PCI J.0 H.
QUOTE DUDE UNQUOTE STEL FOR, CAMELER, AND AL SACHS, WENT CLUE 4)
CONTACTED AT WACO, TEXAS, BY SA TO GO MC WILLIAMS, JR.
LEONARD SIMPSON, PCI, CAPTIAN TOM BENNETT, DETECTIVE, WACO
PD, HERBERT VAHRENKAMP, MC LENNAN COUNTY SO, DOLORES BARNES,
RMA, JANE MARSTALLER, RECORDS SECTION, WACO PD.
CONTACTED AT WACO BY SA WILLIAM H. BUCKLER. SAM ABDNOR,
MANAGER, ELKS CLUB, KNOWN MEETING PLACE OF CENTRAL TEXAS
GAMBLERS, RALPH GREENWOOD SALTER, PCI, AND ADMITTED PROFESSIONAL
GAMBLER IN CENTRAL TEXAS AND HOT SPRINGS, ARKANSAS, AREAS FOR
TWENTYFIVE YEARS •
CONTACTED AT TEMPLE, TEXAS, BY SA O. LEE GOLDEN. CHARLES
V. FLORA, PCI AND KNOWN GAMBLER, BARNEY HAM, PCI AND KNOWN
GAMBLER, SA FIVE THREE EIGHT DASH C.
END PAGE FOUR
DocId: 32279111 Page 4
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10256-10298.pdf | 104-10256-10298 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 06/17/1972 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | SDO | TOUR OF DUTY REPORT FROM SDO. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK46 : F6-B : 1998.01.11.13:45:56:700108 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10256-10298
104415171
09
LEMORANDUM FOR : Chiei, Building Security Branc.
FROM
: SDO' s
SUBJECT
: Tour of Duty Report, 1700 - 0100 hours
1700 - Intered on duty. Reviewed current OSDO instructions, chrono
file and previous tour of duty report..
2.
1705
SB, inquiried if the keys to any rental cars
had been leit
in the OSDO. SDO advised Mr
in the
negative. GGS
1710 - Received backstop call on 356-5996 from Ken for Andrews.
Message passed to fir. Smith. Call logged. WEC
% 1720 - James Fearon, MDO, advised he can be reached via Pageboy #1l4
until further notice. WEG
56: 1740 - Sid Feders, CBS/NEWS, called to verify the former employment
of Edward McCord. Obtained Mr. Feders telephone number and
advised him the Special Ass't. would call him. Contacted and
briefed Mr. Unumb who will handle. SDO will respond to SR&CD
to run a name check.
,б.
1740 - Operations Center requested a name check on Edward Martin, who
was involved in a demonstration at the Watergate and claimed to
be employed by the Agency. After a check of SR&CD based on
information available, SDO informed the Operations Center that
the Subject had not been employed by the Agency. The same is
true for item #5 and Mr. Unumb so advised. GGS WEG
1750 - Mr.
Iszard, Med Psa/Do, advised that he can be reached via Page
Boy #141 until further
notice. WEC
8.
1755 - USSP Cumbow, Key Building, reported a possible violation in you
210, ext-3712. Advised USSP to impound the material and thai de
SDO would respond. WEC
1805 - Mr. Van Damm, DD/Log, advised that he can be reached on 759-2712
after 1830 hours. WEC
70. 1825 - Mr. Dennis, SOD Support Staff, advised that he would be away from
home for about an hour and would call when he returns. WEC
1825 - Mrs
spouse of
FE, requested that the SDO
attempt to determine the location
and ETA of her husband, who
was enroute from Saigon. Contacted
FE, and the CSDO
who will handle. GGS
C0o Coy
TIT!
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10413-10064.pdf | 104-10413-10064 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 1/1/64 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | RUSS HOLMES WORK FILE | OFFICE NOTES RE AGENTS | 5 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK-RH08 : F150 : 20040324-1064325 : | 5 | ## Page 1
GIN
104-10413-10064•
dl
(Teusó)
(hiramias
replatach
Rogu Kuuguani -
Johu
fidontre
hittauptlu-Fanando
G-aatierricz
Barrios
A cin c
DFS
-Bt5:
---
## Page 2
13-00000
Poste
06
---
## Page 3
13-00000.
FITAMI/}
04
(Consuclo Especon)
об
-
(201-330173)
Sea. O Ranot, ie tered
in
(1970.)
DoB (1909) Mhexicen eit.
30 yps in Gart.
08
Pang
(201-79830)
(Caro'" ferads.)
Pradley CI/RB
(uTAMiC/9) Quis ted Olkenu
Suiti) - Ceultuas Gst du sns)
buban
boun
in Spein @(1955)
Hieplaued
04
i2/NN
thc
---
## Page 4
13-00000.
sd" isdf
cAXesSg
/02e6102080/
04
701-798301
1. (Corlas JURADO?.
.oi, 0б
1 Quis ALPißU Seuho - 329609)
3. Grieile ESPEicaN )04
PLIRInG 3 =241-330173)
EEiTAmI9
(7):
LICOOKIE =
eie Calif-
6/rV
---
## Page 5
13-00000 .
e."' ''". pe
...t/trt1:'
Nxes arde 320450 6043assiarkea
Stail inn.Cogee
iraleae!
. Iye tea
Baub.na..
imwihia.cee
Habat Mauel
hoes in Mriarni)
Lucie A. Dilleugas
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10063-10265.pdf | 104-10063-10265 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 7/5/72 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CIA, HEADQUARTERS | MHCURB MHCHAOS | JOSEPH KRAFT LEFT PARIS FOR HANOI 1 JULY. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK10 : F6 : 20031216-1025846 : | 1 | ## Page 1
1104-0063-10265)
JuL 5
18 55272
SE CRE I ASISATZ JUL 72 RESTRICTED HANDLING
CITE S
2592
HEADQUARTERS.
RYBAT. MHCURB MACHAOS
UNION ADVISED STA AND LNERGO 5 JULY FOLLOWINGS
JOSEPH KRAFT LEFT PARIS FOR HANOS 1 JULY, JANE FONDA GRANTED
VISA TO HANOI• THREE UNIDENTIFIED AMERICAN TRADE UNIONISTS
WHO DUE ARRIVE PARIS SHORTLY ALSO AUTHORIZED VISIT NORTH
VIEINAM.. EX-2, APDIR, WN-SISM.
SECRET
CLASSIFICATION REVIEW
CONDUCTED ON. 12 APR 1976
/ 2IMPDET CL BY.01.2170
WARNING NOTICE
SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES
AND METHODS INVOLVEU
ICLASSIFIED BY G8 505
EXEMPT FROM SERERAL DECLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
0F E. Q. 11252, EXCEPTISH SATESCHY:
50C), C, (3) or (4) (dirate one or more)
AUTOMATICALLY DECLASSIFIED ON
Approval of DCI
10333
Maris 2604
10 Miles 12
1 Caram
Adies: Bi
die:
Like=an
MISE
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10100-10274.pdf | 104-10100-10274 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 10/26/1963 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 201-289248 | MEXICO CITY | DIRECTOR | FOOTLOCKER SHIPPED | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK33 : F6 : 1996.07.26.14:47:33:750075 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10100-10274
03
CLASSIRED MET-S
ORIG
Wit dee
EXT : : 7282
Far Ma C3 = 1:1
DATE :24 October 1903
To. :Mexico City
FROM: DIRECTOR
CONF: .,.3
INFO: (" 2, J1, RF:
VR
1: 8c7? 1: 493
A7.0EN
! A
TO
dont irit.
INFO
MEXI
78235
REF:
MEXI 6461 (IN 36742)*
MICHNOFF SO LBS FOOTLOCKER SHIPPED VIA EASTERN AIRLINES. AIR
WAYBILL NO. 007-DCA-209279• CONSIGNED TO MRS. HARRY CHANDLER AS
EMB:: MANIFESTED AS USED PERSONAL, EFFECTE. SHIPPING HARGES NOT
PREPAID. CONBINATION LOCK SET AT 32-13-26.
END OF MESSAGE
Oh. 1219
Exi.
RAT*: 26
129x
Fille
itin
4MB
SRE:
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
• Advise pessibility ait forgot one plece or
MI CHOPP ME eroning clothing.
sH/:
bell It
03
WILl
CHIl
CUTERS W SUPPORT
TRAG CHIEF, WN LOGISTICS
AUTHENT
RRRODUCTION DECRIES THAN THE
770
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 180-10131-10339.pdf | 180-10131-10339 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | HSCA | 04/13/1978 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 014739 | GOODPASTURE, ANN | 155 | HSCA | SECURITY CLASSIFIED TESTIMONY | 3/12/18 | Box 9 | null | ## Page 1
180-10131-10339
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
10/19/20
AGENCY: HSCA
RECORD NUMBER:
180-10131-10339
RECORD SERIES :
SECURITY CLASSIFIED TESTIMONY
AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 014739
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: HSCA
FROM:
GOODPASTURE, ANN
TO :
TITLE :
DATE:
PAGES:
SUBJECTS :
04/13/1978
155
CIA, FILES
CIA, METHODOLOGY
OSWALD, LEE, POST RUSSIAN PERIOD, TRAVEL, TRIP TO
MEXICO
GOODPASTURE, ANN, TESTIMONY BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE
CIA, STAFF
DOCUMENT TYPE: TRANSCRIPT
CLASSIFICATION: Declassified
RESTRICTIONS: 1B
CURRENT STATUS : Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW :
02/01/2003
OPENING CRITERIA:
COMMENTS :
Box 9
v9.1
HW 50955
DooId: 32277224
Page
---
## Page 2
Stenographic Transcript
601
HEARINGS
Belore be
Subcommittee/on the Assassination of John Fo Kennedy
of the
SELECT COMMITTEE ON
ASSASSIMATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
• EXECUTIVE SESSION
WashIngton .D.c
Apг:1 136 1978
Alderson
Reporting Company inC.
Offioval Reporters
300 Seventh St. Sew Washington,D.C.
554.2345
---
## Page 3
IONE : amt
1-1
EXECUTIVE
SESSION
THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 1978
HASHTNGTON,
D. C.
20024 (202) 554-2395
12
13
REFORTER:
SON PIN STREET
18
19
20
21
U.S. House of Representatives,
Subcommittee on the Assassina-
tion of John F. Kennedy of
the Select Committee on
Assassinations,
Washington, D.C.
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:15 a.m.
in room 1310, Longworth House Office Building, Hon. Richardson
Preyer (Chairman of the Subcommittee) presiding.
Present:
Representatives Preyer, Dodd, Fithian and
Sawyer.
Also present: G. R. Blakey, G. Cornwell, E. Berning,
D. Hardway, B. Wolf, M. Goldsmith, R. Mörrison, R. Cenzman,
K. Klein and W. Cross.
MI. Preyer. | The Committee will come to order.
The Chair recognizes the clerk of the Committee to read
us a record of those members who are officially designated
to be on the Subcommittee today, pursuant to Committee Rule
12.3.
21
25
The Clerk. Mr. Chairman, you, Mr. Thone, Mr. Sawyer
and Mr. Dodd are regular members of the Subcommittee. Mr.
Fithian will be substituting for Mrs. Burke.
001143
MEGEREON RETORTING GUMPANY IC
NN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 3
---
## Page 4
1-2
2
3
÷
ITH STREET,
s.H.
REPORTELS
MELDING,
MAGMINICTON.
n. C
20021
(202)
10
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
Mr. Preyer. Thank you.
The Chair will entertain a motion to go into Executive
Session at this time.
Mr. Sawyer. I so move, Mi. Chairman.
MI. Preyer. There has been a motion that today's
hearing, one that the hearing be held in Executive Session.
This is on the basis that information obtained by the
Committee, that the evidence or testimony may tend to degrade
or incriminate people.
The Clerk will call the roll on the motion.
The Clerk. Mr. Preyer?
Mr. Preyer. Aye.
The Clerk, Mr.
Thone?
(No response)
The Clerk. Mr. Sawyer?
MI. Sawyer. Aye.
The Clerk.
Mr.
Dodd?
(No response)
The Clerk. Mr. Fithian?
Mr. Fithian. Aye.
Thei Clerk. Three ayes, MI. Chairman.
MI. Preyer. The meeting is declared closed and the
room will be cleared of all unauthorized personnel.
Are you ready to call the witness at this time?
Mr. Goldsmith. I have some statements. I would like to
001144
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 4
---
## Page 5
1-3
2
3
make off the record:
(Discussion off the record.)
Mr. Fithian. Would the witness please stand to be
SWOIn?
300
7TI STREET,
s.W.
REPORTERS
NUTLOTIG
MASHINGTON, D.C.
20024
(202)
551-2345
5
Ms. Goodpasture. I have one problem. I cannot hear.
Mr. Fithian. Can you hear if I come through at this
7
8
9
level?
10
12
13
14
15
Ms. Goodpastrue. Yes. I use a hearing aid. It is not
always reliable. I do not want you to waste my time and I
do not want to waste too much of yours.
Mr. Fithian. We will need to swear you in, Ms. Good-
pasture.
Ms. Goodpasture. Do you want me to stand?
Mr. Fithian.
Yes, please stand.
Do you swear thatethe information you are about to
give to this Committee is the truth, the whole truth and
nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
001145
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 5
---
## Page 6
1-4
3
20024 (202)
551-2345
5
10
1TH
STREET,
s.w.
REPOSIT:
12
13
74
• 15
1á
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
23
TESTIMONY OF ANN GOODPASTURE
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you state your name and address
for the record?
Ms. Goodpastrue. My name is Ann Goodpasture. My local
address is with friends in Maryland, 5600 Bridgeview.
My mailing address, at the moment, is in care of my
father in Livingstone, Tennessee.
MI. Fithian. If I may, now that we have your name on
the record and your address, I would like to explain our
proceedings here, Miss Goodpasture.
The House Resolution 222, under which this Subcommittee
acts, mandates that the Committee conduct a full and complete
investigation and study of the circumstances surrounding the
assassination and the death of President John F. Kennedy
including determining whether the existing laws of the United
States concerning the protection of the President and the
investigatory jurisdiction and capability of agencies and
departments are adequate in their provisions and enforcement;
and whether there was full disclosure of evidence and informa-
tion among agencies and departments of
the United States
government; and whether any information or evidence not in
theppossession of an agency or department would have been of
assistance in investigating the assassination; and why such
information was not provided or collected by that agency or
department; and to make recommendations to the House, if the
001146
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 6
---
## Page 7
1-5
3
20029 (202)
554-2345
7
₴
REPORTERS
1011.0196,
WASHINGTON,
10
! 1
12
300
ITH STREET
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
Select Committee deems it appropriate, for the amendment of
existing legislation or the enactment of new legislation.
I would like, because of the special expertise of this
witness, if counsel will withhold for just a moment, say a
word of two about the process that we are engaged in.
First, we commend you for your long years of service
to a very, very important agency of this
government. I:
personally was a part of that in a very, very small way in
the Navy a long time ago, and I commend you for your dedica-
tion and your experience and what has come to be your reputa
tion for, as we have talked with other members of the agency,
they have referred to you as sort of the touchstone, or the
person who was the expert among the experts.
I want to say also that I personally want to commend
our Chief Counsel, Professor Blakey, and our assistant
counsels for their long and dilligent effort to build a
relationship with the agencies which is now beginning to be
extremely productive and fruitful in our whole process of
trying to get all the information and to lay the matter of
the assassination of the President of the United States to
rest permanently with the complete story.
I just wanted you to know that we have been working
with the CIA and the FBI and they have been very cooperative
with us as well as the State Department in the two investi-
gations in which we are now engaged, and I look forward to
001147
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
17 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 7
---
## Page 8
1-6
2
3
S
ann
7TH STRET
S.W. REPONTERS
MALDING,
WASHINGTON,
D. C.
20024
(202)
554-2345
10
1z
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
your testimony today as a person of longstanding and long
experience with one of the key agencies in the United
States
government and hope that we can proceed today to fit
in some pieces of the
mosaic that we are trying to assemble.
Counsel may proceed.
Mr. Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, have you received a
copy of the Committee Rules and the Committee Resolution?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, you gave me a copy yesterday.
MI. Goldsmith. What is your present employment status,
Miss Goodpasture?
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
MT..
Goldsmith. What is your present employment status,
Miss Goodpasture?
Ms • Goodpastrue.
I am retired.
Mr. Goldsmith.
Were
you formerly employed with the
Central Intelligence Agency?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes:
Mr. Goldsmith. What was your term of service with the
CIA?
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. What was my term of service?
Mr. Goldsmith. How many years were you with the CIA?
Ms: Goodpasture.. Over 31.
Mr. Goldsmith. At this time, I would like to refer to
Exhibit 94. Would the Clerk please hand that to the witness?
Miss Goodpasture --
001148
ALCERSON REPORTINO CONFANY, INC
HH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 8
---
## Page 9
1-7
2
3
J00 9TH STREET.
S.H.
REPORTERS BUCIDING,
HASHINGTON, D. С
3
15
17
8
17
20
23
21
25
Ms. Goodpasture. I read this yesterday.
Mr. Goldsmith. - Exhibit No. 94 is a copy of a letter
written by the present Director of Central Intelligence to the
Chairman of this Committee.
I believe a copy was given to
you yesterday, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you read that letter yesterday?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes:
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you understand that letter?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated that you worked with the
Central Intelligence Agency for 31 years. Which branch within
the CIA did you work
for?
Ms. Goodpasture. For the entire length of time?
MI. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, I worked for a number of
different branches, but most of the time I was outside of the
United States and it came under what is now called the
Director of Operations, or clandestine service.. I suppose
that would be a more appropriate term.
Mr. Goldsmith Fine.
When did you retire from the CIA?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think it was in June, 1973.
Mr. Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, I am drawing your
attention to 1963. Where were you stationed at that time?
001149
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 9
---
## Page 10
1-8
2
3
REFORTERS BUSTDTNG
VAGMINCTON: D.C. 20024
(202)
554-2345
3
Ms . Goodpasture.
Where was I stationed at that time?
Mr. Goldsmith.
YeS.
Ms. Goodpasture. Here in Washington. Oh, 1963?
Excuse me.
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. I thought you said '73. I was
stationed in Mexico City.
MI. Goldsmith. In what capacity were you stationed
in Mexico City?
Ms. Goodpasture. I was a staff employee of the CIA
10
1!
12
13
14
15
300
7TH
STRET
17
18
1.9
20
21
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith. What were your responsibilities as a
staff employee at that time?
Ms. Goodpasture. I worked as a case officer on liaison
projects with the Mexicans and liaison with other government
agencies represented in the Embassy. I did routine clerical
office functions, originating correspondence, answering
correspondence.
Mr. Goldsmith. What type of liaison work did you do
with the Mexican government?
Ms. Goodpasture. What type of -= 1,00 wade die gon
Mr. Golsmith.- liaison work did you do with the
Mexican government.
Ms. Goodpasture, What type of inside?
Mr. Goldsmith, Liaison. You indicated that you did
001150
ALGERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HH 50955
DocId:32277224 Page 10
---
## Page 11
1-9
2
3
20024 (202)
554-2345
7
8
10
7T11
STREET,
s.1.
REFORDCES MICIDING,
12
i3
15
16
17
13
19
20
liaison work with the Mexican govemment.
Ms. Goodpasture. Electronic surveillance.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the Chief of Station?
Ms. Goodpasture. Winston Scott.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it appropriate to refer to you as
having been Winston
Scott's righthand man during your term
of service in Mexico City?
Ms. Goodpasture. I take exception to that. First of
all, I am not a man; and second, I think that his righthand
person was his Deputy who participated in all the decision
making processes, which I did not, and acted for Mr. Scott
in his absence.
A lot of people said that I was Winn's right hand because e
at times he asked me to do things for him that. he did not ask
other people to do. He depended upon me for certain projects
that he managed, or
he wanted to manage, and I did the legwork
for it.
I would not say that I was his right hand in the entire
station.
Mr. Goldsmith.
How many years. did you work in Mexico
City?
23
24
23
Ms: Goodpasture.
Mr. Goldsmith.
entire time?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Eleven.
Were you working with Mr. Scott that
Yes.
He was there first,
001151
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 11
---
## Page 12
1-10
2
3
n.C. 20024
(202)
551-2315
S
3
10
З00 7T11
STREET
S.W.
RI:PORTERS
BUILDING,
12
13
14
•15
17.
18
17
20
21
23
24
25
Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated that you were not
involved in the actual decision-making process.
Were YOu
privy. to the actual decision-making process?
Ms. Goodpasture. It depended upon what it concerned.
If it was a project that I worked on, I participated in it,
but if it were a station activity, I did not.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did youwork at the station in Mexico
City also involve occasionally making contact with CIA agents
in the field?
Ms • Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. Would you give the Congressional panel
an evaluation of Winn Scott's competence as the Chief of
Station?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, I think that he was a very
conscientious man, he was a hardworking man, he expected
everyone else. to do their work, he worked long hours.
Some
people felt, or expressed the opinion, in my presence, that
he was a hard worker and expected too much from employees,
but I do not think that that was really the case. He was
a very conscientious man, an intelligent man. He obviously
had the intelligence for the post, or he would not have been
assigned there.
MI. Goldsmith. Is the Mexico City station one of the
largest CIA stations in operation?
Ms. Goodpasture, At the present time, I do not know.
001152
WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 12
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC
---
## Page 13
1-11
2
3
30n
STREET,
. H, REPONTERS
BUTIDING.
HASHINGTON, n.C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
5
ó
10
12
13
15
17
18
19
20
2 1
23
24
25
At that time, it was one of the largest ones in Latin America,
but not in comparison to the other places. I could not
comment on the size of the other places.
Mr. Goldsmith. What kind of attitude did Mr. Scott
have towards the importance of files and recordkeeping systems
at the Mexico City station?
Ms. Goodpasture. He was very conscientious. He wanted
them maintained accurately and completely.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long were the files that he main-
tained preserved?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, I am not too sure about that.
They were there up until the time that I left, but I think
that there was a reduction because of space in 1969. 'The
files were cut back, but I do not have firsthand knowledge
of that because I did not participate in it.
Mr. Goldsmith. During the time that you were in Mexico
City with Mr. Scott, to your knowledge was anything ever
thrown out of destroyed from the Mexico City station files?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, several things were destroyed
that were not considered of any value as far as the work at
that time was concerned.
We looked at it more or less like
keep cash register receipts for a
grocery bill. There was a
limitation of space on just how long you could keep certain
things.
But there were no documents that were a part of the
001153
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC
WH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 13
---
## Page 14
3
20024
( 202)
551-2345
ó
3
300 7TH1
STREET,
REPORTERS BUILDING,
MASHTHCTON,
10
12
13
74
15
Té
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
1-12
official files that could be destroyed without a certificate
of destruction being made. That did not apply to our rough
notes that we made, but you could not take a file out, go
through it and tear it up because you did not like something
in it.
Mr. Goldsmith. It has been said of Mr. Scott that
during his tenure in Mexico City not even a shred of paper
was thrown out or moved from the Mexico City station files.
would you say that is an accurate statement?
Ms. Goodpasture. Some of the rough paper was thrown
out, the rough paper that he considered supporting data for a
dispatch that he had written or a cable that he sent, he kept.
He insisted that other people do the same thing.
Mr. Goldsmith, Fine.
At this time, I am going to get into the area of the
surveillance operations in Mexico City.
Miss Goodpasture, what kinds of surveillance operations
did the CIT have in Mexico City in 1963 with respect to the
Soviet and Cuban consulate and embassies?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, we had electronic surveillance,
wiretaps, which covered telephone conversations.
Mr. Goldsmith, If I may interrupt you for a moment, could
you possibly raise the mike closer to your mouth so that we
might hear you better?
Ms. Goodpasture.
We had electronic surveillance,
001154
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
NN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 14
---
## Page 15
1-13
2
3
5
ó
7
₴
300 7T11
STREET.
s.W.
REPORTERS
MUTINING,
MASHLICTON,
D.C. 20029
10
11
12
13
15
17
19
2
22
23
24
25
wiretaps on the telephones in the Soviet Embassy, and we had
photographic surveillance.
There was also what they called foot surveillance at
times, when people were interested, they could find out where
they were staying, where they went from the Soviet Embassy.
Mt. Goldsmith.
That would be physical surveillance?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Turning first to the area of photographic
surveillance, what was the purpose of the photographic
surveillance project with regard to the Soviet and Cuban
embassies and consuls?
Ms. Goodpasture. My understanding of that was that it
was to be used to identify those people who might be working
for the Soviets as espionage agents who were U.s. citizens
who went down there driving a car with a U.S. license plate
on it, or people we did not know but could identify.
The same procedure was also used for trying to identify
people other than U.S. citizens, but it was concentrated in
the beginning on license plates or numbers, or something that
could be identified.
MI. Goldsmith. An attempt would be made to take pic-
tures of both the car, license plates and the occupants of
the car, is that correct?
Ms . Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine.
001155
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 15
---
## Page 16
1-14
3
5.l.
REFORTERS
NUTIOTNG,
MACHINERON. D. C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
ó
7
10
12
13
15
7
18
19
20
2!
23
24
23
Turning now to the photographic surveillance operation
with regard to the Soviet Embassy and consulate, I would
like to ask you, what role, if any, did you play with regards
to this surveillance operation during 1963?
Ms. Goodpasture. In 1963, I was more or less a bystander
of that operation because the operation, at times, was conducted
by another case officer:
I screened and looked at the photographs because I had
been there in the early part of the operation where the
photograph bases were first set up, were first used. I had
an interest in them, or looked at them to see that they were
in focus, that the negatives were all printed, and Mr.
Scott asked me to do that because I had been a commercial.
photographer before. I went to work for the goverment.
MI. Goldsmith, Are you saying, in 1963, your r01l
with regard to the photographic surveillance at the Soviet
Embassy was to review photographs, essentially to evaluate
their quality?
Ms, Goodpasture. Their technical quality.
Mr. Goldsmith, Not for the purpose of obtaining subse
quent information from the photographs?
Ms. Goodpasture, No, because, at that time, by 1963
there was a staff there who had been assigned to work on
Soviet matters and it was their function to investigate the
leads - we called them leads -- to try to identify the person
001156
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
NN 50955 DocId:32277221 Page 16
---
## Page 17
1-15
2
3
ITH STREET,
S.W.
REPORTERS BUCIDING,
MASHINICION,
o. C.
20024
(202)
55k
234
7
10
'1
12
13
15
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
at the Soviet embassy they were interested in.
So all the raw material went to them. I usually took
a quick look at the photographs when they came in, and if
I noticed anything significant about them, I mentioned it to
the Soviet case officer, but he gave the formal reporting on
all the Soviet information.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand.
How many cameras were in operation with regard to the
photosurveillance of the Soviet Embassy and consulate?
Ms: Goodpasture. Three. There were three, generally.
There could be any number. if we wanted to put some on
the street, but at that time, I think there were only three.
MI. Goldsmith. Where were these cameras located?
Ms. Goodpasture. Where?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. They were located around the building.
the embassy building, to cover the area in the yard and in
the front
gate.
Mr. Goldsmith. So the cameras were situated so that
they would photograph the yard area and front entrance gate?
Ms . Goodpasture.
Yes
Mr. Goldsmith. During this period, was your role with
regards to this project at any time of a supervisory nature,
actually supervising the project?
Ms. Goodpasture. Informally it could have been interpreted
001157
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HN 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 17
---
## Page 18
1-16
2
3
5
7
8
10
13
13
17
300
19
20
23
24
in that way, but I never had the responsibility for them
alone.
MI. Goldsmith. As a practical matter, you were acting
in an informal supervising capacity?
Ms. Goodpasture. It could have been interpreted that
way by some of the people, because they would come to me and
bring me photographs and say, what do you think of this, do
you think that this is a latin, or do you think he has ever
been to the Soviet Embassy before.
Mr. Goldsmith. In your own opinion do you think you
were acting, at least infomally, in a supervisory capacity
with regards to this project?
Ms, Goodpasture.
No.
Mr. Goldsmith. At this time, I would like for the
witness to be
given Stack C of the documents that have been
prepared.
(Pause)
I would like to draw your attention to page 2 of the
documents that appear in Stack C.
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to ask you if you can
identify that document.
Ms, Goodpasture.
This looks like a copy of a cable sent
from the Mexico station on the 8th of October.
Mr. Goldsmith. To whom would the cable have been sent?
001158
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC
NH 50955 Doold: 32277224 Page 18
---
## Page 19
1-17
2
3
30n
ITH STREET
S.l.
REFORTERS
KULDING
CASINGTON,
D.C.
20024
(202)
5516-2345
12
13
15
17.
18
19
20
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. It was sent to Washington.
MI. Goldsmith. CIA Headquarters?
Ms. Goodpasture. CIA Headquarters.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to have you examine the
cable in more detail. I call your attention to the first
paragraph.
What does the term "the envoy" mean?
Ms: Goodpasture. What was that again?
Mr. Goldsmith.: I am sorry. I am drawing your atten-
tion to the first paragraph.
Ms• Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. The second word --
Ms. Goodpasture. Page two?
Mr. Goldsmith. Page two. There appears a word "the
envoy." What does that word
. me an?
Ms. Goodpasture.
That was a cryptonym to identify
the telephone surveillance. Instead of saying a telephone
tap operation we used crytonyms for all of the things that
involved assets outside that could be identified.
MI. Goldsnith. I am not drawing your attention to the
upper lefthand corner of this document. There appears the
word "orig." Whät does that stand for?
Ms. Goodpasture, The person who wrote the cable.
MI. Goldsmith. Does that stand for originating officer?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. You say the originating officer is the
001159
HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 19
ALGERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. ING.
---
## Page 20
1-18
2
3
SON IT! STREET,
5.V. REPORTERS BUILDING,
MASHINGTON,
n. C.
20024
(202)
554-2345
5
10
12
13.
14
15
17
18
17
20
23
24
person who wrote the cable, correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. In this case, it is.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who was identified in this document as
the originating officer.
Ms. Goodpasture. The originating officer is Mr. Herbert
Minell.
Mr. Goldsmith. Please listen to my questions carefully
and just answer my questions. I think you may be trying to
anticipate.
Who is identified in the upper lefthand corner as the
person who issued the document? What name is given?
Does it say
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is the term
a pseudonym?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. It is a pseudonym for Herbert Minell?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. I take it that these documents commonly
used pseudonymns, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. In almost all cases that was the
practice.
Mr. Goldsmith. What would be the purpose of using a
pseudonym?
Ms, Goodpasture. In case the document happened to fall
outside classified control, it would be meaningless to the
001160
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 20
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 21
1-19
2
3
30л
ITH STREET,
5.11.
REPORTERS
AUILDING
MASHINGTON,
n. C.
2002% (202)
551-2345
5
ó
7
3
people who picked it up than if the true name were on it.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand.
Let us take a look at the lower righthand corner of
this same document. It says, releasing officer. What is
a releasing officer?
Ms. Goodpasture.
W. C. Curtis. That was a pseudonym
for Winston Scott.
MI. Goldsmith. Understood.
What is a releasing officer? What are his responsibil-
10
!!
12
13
ities?
15
16
17
18
17
20
21
22
23
24
Ms. Goodpasture. The supervisor, the person who decides
that the message should be sent; generally the releasing offi
cer is the chief, the senior person there at the time, the
person who will assume responsibility for the message after
it has been transmitted.
MI. Goldsmith. The message would go --
Ms. Goodpasture. For instance, in an Embassy, if a
document goes to the communications center signed by someone
who is not the senior person in the section, they will not
send it; just everybody cannot take a message to the message
center and say, send this cable to Washington.
So this is to make sure that the Chief of the Section
knows that is going on by everybody in his section.
Mr. Goldsmith, I would not like to draw your attention
to page 5 of Stack C. That pertains to a different cable, but
001161
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 21
ALDERSON REPORTNO COMPANY, INC
---
## Page 22
1-20
2
3
7
REPONTERS QUIDDING,
NASHTUCTON, n. C.
20024
10
1
12
13
15
15
17
STREEP
19
20
23
24
23
simply for the purpose of clarifying terminology, I would
like you to look at the lower righthand corner where it says,
"Authenticating Officer."
What is
an authenticating officer?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, this cable originated in
Washington and in Washington there are more than one chief,
so the person who signs off on it - it may be a Branch Chief.
In this case, it was the Division Chief.
He approved sending the cable and then his superior
released it.
MI. Goldsmith.. So the authenticating officer woüld be
someone under the releasing officer, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, to be sure about that, you
would have to check with the communications people on their
practices, but I think that sometimes it could be the same.
If
the authenticating officer were the Section Chief,
then the Section Chief could also release the message.
Mr. Goldsmith, Were you ever an authenticating officer?
Ms. Goodpasture. No. Well, I have signed off on cables
going out from Headquarters at times, I am sure.
MI, Goldsmith..
• Only from Headquarters?
Ms. Goodpasture. The fact that you sign there as an
authenticating officer does that mean that that is a title,
It means that you were the person who were probably best
informed on that subject, I think.
001162
WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 22
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 23
1-21
2
3
7
21'11
STREET,
5.V1.
REPORTERS
BUILDING,
WASHINGTON,
n. C.
2002%
10
!!
12
13
15
17
19
20
?1
23
24
MI. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, is
it the responsibility of the authenticating officer to verify
the contents of the cable?
Ms. Goodpasture.
It might be, I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. What would the specific purpose of an
authenticating officer be?
Ms. Goodpasture. I never went into that terminology
with anyone.
Mr.Fithian. Would the counsel permit a question?
Mr Goldsmith. Yes, sir.
Mr. Fithian. In our Navy communications sytem, we
sometimes distinguished between an authenticating officer as
one who not only authorized the sending of the cable, but
authenticated or verified or vouched for, the content.
Is that similar?
Ms. Goodpasture. That would be the literal interpre
tation of the word. Whether ornot it was used in air traffic.
all the time or not, I do not know.:
My guess would be that that is correct.
MI. Fithian. Do you know whether, in CIA traffic,
you had to have both an authenticating officer and a releasing
officer for a single message?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think that there were times when one
person could sign both places.
Mr, Fithian. Thank you, counsel,
001163
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC.
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 23
---
## Page 24
2
3
MASATICTON.
D.0. 2002%
(202)
554-2345
10
12
15
300
7TH STREET,
17
18
19
20
21
1-22
Mr. Goldsmith. Would the phrase authenticating officer
appear only on cable traffic that originated at headquarters?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. You would have to
compare the field forms and headguarters forms to be sure
of that
MI. Goldsmith. On those occasions when you acted as
authenticated officer, did you see your purpose as being that
of verifying the contents of the cable for accuracy?
Ms, Goodpasture.™
Yes.:
it at torti
Mr. Goldsmithin I would like, to go now to page 2: of.
the documents contained in Stack C and I would like you to
read the second paragraph.
(Pause)
Ms • Goodpasture, Yes.
Mx. Goldsmith, Was the photograph referred to in this
paragraph obtained by the CIA's photo surveillance operation
of the Soviet Embassy?
Ms, Goodpasture. Yes.
Well, this message has a mistake in it which was not
noted at that time in paragraph 2, and that is the date,
Mr. Goldsmith, We will get to that later on to clarify
that.
23
24
25
would you tell the Committee what the scope of the
coverage of the Soviet Embassy and consulate was? By that,
I mean in September and October, 1963, at what times were the
001164
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
NY 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 24
---
## Page 25
1-23
3
REPORTERS BUDDING,
MACHINOTON,
n. C.
20024
554-2345
ó
3
=
!!
12
13
Soviet Embassy and consulate under surveillance?
Ms. Goodpasture. I cannot give you the exact times.
I can guess, and my guess is that they were open most of
the time when the consulate was opened for business hours.
But the person who would have that information, the only
person who would know, is the case officer who was handling
the project at that time.
Mr. Goldsmith. Even though you were acting in what you
regard as an informal supervisory capacity, you do not
recall?
Ms. Goodpasture. No, because a year ago I tried to
find that specific information from the records and I could
not find it; and I do not know. I am sorry. I cannot answer
that.
15
7TH
STREET,
17
18
19
20
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith,
Fine.
I am sorry; It has just been drawn to my attention that
we should clarify -
Ms: Goodpasture. I did not answer that paragraph 2.
I noticed that. Photograph, yes. That was my fault, not yours.
I wanted to correct that date so you would not get the impres-
sion that there was a photograph on the lst of October because
the photograph was made on the 2nd of October, but it was made
by the surveillance from the Soviet Embassy.
MI. Goldsmith, Fine.
You indicated that the scope of the coverage, to your
001165
ALCERSON REFERTINE COMPANY. INC.
WW. 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 25
---
## Page 26
1-24
2
3
knowledge, was probably at such time as the soviet Embassy
and consulate was open, in other words, working hours. Is
that correct, to the best of your knowledge?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think that it was at working hours.
Mr. Goldsmith. What were the working hours of the soviet
Embassy and consulate in September and October, 1963?
Ms. Goödpasture.: I do not know.
MI. Goldsmith. How many years did you work in Mexico
City?
REPORTERS BULLOING
VASHINGTON,
10
!!
12
13
15
300
PTH STREET,
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. Eleven.
MI. Goldsmith. Working in Mexico City for eleven
years and you do not know what the working hours were?
Ms . Goodpasture.
The Soviet Embassy changed their
working hours frequently. Their consulate might be open from
8:00 to 10:00 on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays or they
might change it from 10:00 to 12:00 on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
But for me to say now that in September, 1963, without having
a document to prove it; that they were open from 10:00 to
12:00 would be rather foolish because I really do not know
what their hours were at that time.
MI. Goldsmith. Let us refer to a document, then. Will
the Clerk hand the witness Stack D?
Drawing your attention to page 3 -
Ms, Goodpasture. Right.
MI. Goldsmith. In Stack D, can you identify this
001166
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 26
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 27
1-25
3
554-2345
7
300 PIU STREET
s.W.
REPORTERS NUCLDING,
MASHSICTON,
10
12
13
15
15
18
20
21
23
24
25
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 27
document?
Ms. Goodpasture.
It looks like a cable that was sent
to Mexico.
MI. Goldsmith.
Is that cable 9332?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to ask you to read the
first paragraph of that cable.
Ms. Goodpasture. It has the normal work hours there.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does this cable accurately reflect what
the normal working hours were of the Soviet Embassy?
Ms. Goodpasture, I do not know. The work hours are
listed here, but I do not know who originated this cable.
MT .
Goldsmith. Who was the authenticating officer on
this cable?
Ms. Goodpasture. I did, but I could not find this
message last year.
Mr. Goldsmith. The answer to the question who the
authenticating officer was is you?
Ms: Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith, there on page 4 it indicates that the
authenticating officer was
Ms. Goodpasture. That was my pseudo.
MI. Goldsmith, In light of the fact that you were
the authenticating
Ms, Goodpasture. I do not have a memory of the specific
0011677
ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC
---
## Page 28
1-26
2
3
П. С. 20024 (2012)
551-2345
3
.3
10
! 1
i2
13
З00 PTI
STREET.
S.l.
RETORTERS
15
17
18
1
20
23
24
23
hours at that time.
MI. Goldsmith. I would like, at this point, to refer
your attention to page 1 of the documents contained in Stack
D.
I would like to ask you to read the first two para-
graphs.
(Pause)
Ms. Goodpasture. The first paragraph?
MI. Goldsmith. It is labelled up top, memo to Mr.
Popitch at FBI. I think that it is the stack that we just put
by your right hand. I would like to ask you to read the
first two paragraphs.
Ms. Goodpasture. The first paragraph?
Mr. Goldsmith. The first two paragraphs.
(Pause)
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does the information contained in this
document contradict the information that is contained
disregard that question.
The question I have now is, according to this document,
it appears that the photograph surveillance was of a continu
ous: nature during daylight hours.
Ms. Goodpasture.
No.
Mr. Goldsmith. What I am saying, according to this
document, the photograhpic surveillance of the Soviet Embassy
and consulate was of a continuous nature during daylight
001168
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 28
ALGERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC
---
## Page 29
1-27
hours:
2
3
LaGUTHCTON, D.C.
20024
(202)
554-2345
5
7
10
11
12
13
300
7TH
STREET
S. 11.
REPORTERS
15
17
18
19
20
21
73
21
Ms • Goodpasture.
We are talking about two different
things here. The surveillance, someone was available there,
but they did not make pictures. They may have been watching
the activity from 9:00 o'clock in the morning until 1:00
o'clock. and may have only made two pictures, one at 11:00
and one at 12:00.
As far as photographic surveillance being continuous,
that would be really inaccurate because it was not a camera
making a picture of every minute's activity.
Mr. Goldsmith, However, there were personnel stationed
at positions outside the Soviet Embassy compound who had
photographic equipment available and ho could take pictures
at any time during daylight hours, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know whether it would be or
not. At any time during daylight hours?
Mr. Goldsmith. I am drawing your attention to the
second paragraph of this document, page 1, the very first
sentence of that paragraph. It says the photographic
coverage of the mentioned installations is of a continuous
nature during daylight hours. Is that an accurate statement?
Ms• Goodpasture. I think in November of 1973 --
Mr. Goldsmith. *63.
Ms, Goodpasture, " after the assassination, the case
officers ordered their people to be on duty continuously, I
001169
HH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 29
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 30
1-28.
am not sure of that. That probably may have prompted this
statement
2
3
Mr. Goldsmith. This documented is dated November 27,
1963.
5
7
3
STREET,
S.V.
REPORTERS BUILDING,
WASHENGTON,
D. C.
10
•12
13
15
1ó
17
20
21
?3
21
25
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes:
Mr. Goldsmith.
Is that correct?
Ms . Goodpasture.
That is the date that is on the
document:
MI. Goldsmith, This document seems to indicate, does
it not, that the photographic coverage of the installations
was of a continuous nature during daylight hours. Is that
correct?
Ms, Goodpasture. That is what the document says here.
MI. Goldsmith. This was a document that was given to
the FBI by the CIA. Is the information contained in this
document accurate as far as that specific sentence is
concerned?
Ms. Goodpasture. I assume it is. This memorandum was
written in Washington, though, at headquarters.
MI. Goldsmith. In your previous answer, you seemed to
be suggesting that this document referred to the coverage
of the embassies after November 22, 1963. I am referring
to the period of September-October 163.
Ms, Goodpasture. I think that this memorandum was
written to tell them the coverage that had been instituted
001170
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 30
---
## Page 31
• 1-29
2
3
300
!
7TH
S.V.
REPORTERS BUILDING.
MASHMIGTON,
D.C.
20024(202)
554-2345
S
after the assassination.
Mr. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, to the
best of your knowledge, what was the scope of the photographic
surveillance of the Soviet Embassy in September and October
1963?
3
.10
Ms. Goodpasture, What is that?
MI. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, to the
best of your knowledge, what was the photographic -- what
was: the scope of the photographic surveillance coverage of
the Soviet Embassy and consulate in September and October,
1963?
2
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. During the hours that that office
would have been opensto receive visitors from the public.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would the clerk please now hand to the
witness the stack labelled A?
Stack A contains actually four sub-stacks, A-l. A-2,
A-3 and A-4,
I would like to draw your attention to Stack A-3.
Ms. Goodpasture.
Page 3?
Mr. Goldsmith. Stack A-3, one of the stacks contained
in Stack A.
Ms. Goodpasture. What page?
Mr" Goldsmith. It is a separate sub-stack within the
overall Stack A
Has your attention now been drawn to Stack A-3? :
001171
ALDERSON REPORTING COMFANY. INC.
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 31
---
## Page 32
1-30
2
3
MACHTICTON,
D.C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
ó
₴
10
!!
12
13
74
15
TTU STREET,
vi
REPORTERS
17
18
20
2}
23
24
25
Ms • Goodpasture.
Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. Can you identify the document that
appears on Stack A-3?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
MI (Goldsmith, What is that document?
Ms. Goodpasture. This is a memorandum, a rough draft,
that I wrote
from memory when I came to Washington a year ago
to be used as background material to try to get together the
information about what was the situation in Mexico at the
time of Oswald's visit and the assassination and to name
people who were there that we could talk to and locate their
records and get as complete a report as we could on what.
happened there.
Mr. Goldsmith. Of all the available personnel from
Mexico City, why were you specifically asked to prepare this
memo randum?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think anybody else was will-
ing to do it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it possible that you were asked to
preparethis memorandum because you had more information
concerning this issue?
Ms. Goodpasture. No, I was asked to do it because the
man who was reviewing it had never been at the Mexico station
and it is just as though he was asked to write a report on this
committee, that he wanted someone that had been in Mexico,
001172
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 32
• ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 33
2
3
554-2345
é
7
2002%
PTI STREET,
5.11
PEPORTERS
RUTIDING,
MaCHINGTON.
10
12
13
14
15
18
19
20
21
13
24
25
1-31
Mr. Goldsmith.
Before we proceed, I would like to ask
you, Miss Goodpasture, to wait until I have finished asking
my question, and although you may have answered the question
I was asking, I would like to ask it again.
Why were you specifically chosen to prepare this
memo randum?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was anybody else from the Mexico City
station who served with you in 1963 asked to prepare similar
memoranda?
Ms. Goodpasture. I was told that all of the people who
were there at the time would be interviewed and would be
asked to do the same thing that I was asked to do.
Mr. Goldsmith. To your knowledge, did they?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. I did not see any of
the results, but that does not mean that they did not.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you familiar with the CIA's Inspec-
toI General Report of 1977?
Ms. Goodpasture. The CIA what?
MI. Goldsmith.: Inspector General's Report of 1977?
Among other things, it dealt with the question of the surveil-
lance operation of Cuban and Soviet Embassies in Mexico City
in 1963.
Ms. Goodpasture. I am sorry. I am going to have to
ask you to repeat that because there is a word in there at the
001173
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955 DooId:32277224 Page 33
---
## Page 34
1-32
beginning I am not sure I understood. Did you say secretarial
board?
2
3
20024
(202)
554-231
5
10
Mr. Goldsmith. No, I did not. I will try to speak up
and to clarify my questions for you. Why do we not defer that
until later on?
I would like to address your attention to page 19 of
this document.
(Pause)
What appears on page 19 of this document? What infor-
mation appears on page 19 of this document?
Ms. Goodpasture. There is a list of names and dates.
Mr. Goldsmith. What are the names and dates related
12
13
to?
REPORTiNG
ITH STREET,
15
1á
17
13.
19
20
?!
Ms. Goodpasture. There were related to people who were,
or who I thought, could have been in Mexico at that time, but
this document was never checked. I did this, I tried to do
this from memory and it was to be checked from the personnel
records for accuracy as well as the other memorandum that you
have.
23
24
What we have here is my rough draft and there may be
some names of people who were not there.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand we are only going to focus
this time on a few of the names.
Drawing your attention to the middle of the page where
it says "unilateral photo, soviets," do you see that?
001174
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC
NN 50955 DocId: 32277224. Page 34
---
## Page 35
1-33
2
3
20024 (202)
551-2345
7
₴
MACITHCTON.
10
12
13
300
ITH STREET,
S. 1.
REPORTERG
15
16
18
20
21
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture.
YeS.
Mr. Goldsmith.
Is your name mentioned under that
category?
MS ..
Goodpasture. My name was there in the initial
status.
Mr. Goldsmith. I think the question calls for a yes or
no answer. Was your name --
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. This was in a report that you prepared,
is that correct?
Ms. Goödpasture.' That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. It says Goodpasture, alternate CO in
internal routing. What does that mean?
Mr. Goodpasture. That means that during the time that
Harry Mahoney was there, when the base was first set up, I
was his alternate case officer and I did the internal routing
for the Soviet photographs. My tenure lasted much longer. I
kept an interest in the Soviets - I mean in the photographs.
When the other people were away on holidays I could meet with
their contact and pick up the photographs and route them.
Sometime in 1964, I had nothing more to do with photo-
graphs.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Mahoney left in April, 1959, is
that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
001175
IN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 35
ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 36
1-34
2
3
7
Mr. Goldsmith. MI. Mahoney left, according to this,
roughly in April, 1959.
Ms. Goodpasture. That is approximate.
I am not sure
of the date.
Mr. Goldsmith. Understood.
However, you continued working in this particular
capacity through 1964. Is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Only when the other people were away,
I met someone outside. That was the function of the alternate
JON ITH STREET,
S.W.
REPORTERS BUILDING,
MASHINGTON,
10
!1
12
13
CO.
15
17
-20
23
21
23
Mr. Goldsmith. What was
responsibility
in regards to this project?
Ms. Goodpasture.
He was a case officer.
MI. Goldsmith. According to page 19, he served in that
capacity from June '63 until October '64, is that correct?
Ms• Goodpasture. I think so.
Mr. Goldsmith. When you say case officer, you mean
case
officer with regard to the Soviet Embassy photosurveil
lance coverage?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that when
received the materials from the photosurveillance operation
he would turn them over, either to you or to Herbert Minell?
Ms. Goodpasture. He sometimes brought the photographs
in to me and I gave them to Herb Minell. On other occasions,
001176
ALGERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
NN 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 36
---
## Page 37
1-35
2
3
he would give it to Herb Minnel directly.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that
responsibility
in this area was simply to do the leg work on the project,
that he himself was not really in chargé of the project?
Ms. Goodpasture. NI, he managed the projects also. He
had complete supervision of the projects, as well as the leg-
work.
JON TTH STRETC
REFORTERS
WASHINGTON,
20024
(202)
7
8
9
12
13
15
17
18
20
==
23
24
23
The production, the material that was produced as a
result of the project, was not his responsibility. That was
MI.
Minnel's.
Mx, Goldsmith. Who was involved in setting the require-
ments on policies with regard to the running of the project?
Ms, Goodpasture.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you certain that the person respon
sible for that was not yourself?
Ms• Goodpasture. Pardon me?
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you certan that you were not
responsible
for setting those requirements and policies?
Ms. Goodpasture. Are you referring to asking people
to asking for coverage over a specific investigation?
Mr. Goldsmith. My question is directed towards whether
you were involved in a supervisory capacity with setting the
requirements and policies as to how the photosurveillance
operation would be run.
Ms. Goodpasture. I talked to him about it; but this
001177
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
NW 50955
DocId: 32277224
Page 37
---
## Page 38
1-36
2
3
5
7
9
10
300
I TH
STREET,
S.W.
REPONTERS RUINING.
WASHTROTON.
12
13
15
1T
18
19
20
23
24
25
was his sole responsibility at the time. He was the case
officer for the project.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that, because of the sensi
tivity of the photosurveillance operation. at the Soviet
Embassy that Winn Scott felt that you were the person who
should run this operation?
Ms . Goodpasture.
I do not think I heard that statement
before. He did not want too many people involved in it
because of the sensitivity and he asked me to review the photo-
graphs to make sure that the outside people did not become
sloppy in the photographic work.
MI.
Goldsmith. Nevertheless, did Winn Scott place you
in a supervisory capacity with regard to this project?
Ms. Goodpasture. No. I never saw anything in writing
that referred to me as supervising the activities of that
project.
Mr. Goldsmith. If not in writing, nevertheless, informally
did Winn Scott designate you as the person who would be super-
vising that project?
Ms. Goodpasture. He may have said informally, I want
you to make sure that those operations are run properly, or
something like that, but I do not think he did. I do not
recall him doing that.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that
was the most
junior officer in the station in 1963?
001178
ALCERSON REFORTINO COMPANY, INC.
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 38
---
## Page 39
1-37
300
STREET,
S: V1.
REPORTERS BUILDING,
casiltuiTON, D.C.
2
3
5
ó
7.
3
10
11
13
14
15
17
19
20
Ms. Goodpasture. That he was what?
Mr. Goldsmith. The most junior officer. He had less
seniority than anybody else in 1963.
Ms. Goodpasture. Agewise, he probably was,
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it also true that the Soviet opera-
tion, in terms of surveillance of the Soviet Embassy, was an
extremely sensitive operation?
Ms. Goodpasture... It was not any more sensitive than
the other operations which
was handling. In fact,
was probably the person most trusted by Winn
scott.
23
21
23
Mr. Goldsmith, I do not believe that the answer is
responsive to my question, though,
Is it true that the Soviet Embassy surveillance opera
tion was one of the most sensitive operations that was in
effect in Mexico City in 1963?
Ms • Goodpasture. I doubt it.
MI. Goldsmith, Would you characterize that operation
as extremely sensitive?
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you characterize that surveil-
lance operation as extremely sensitive?
,MS: Goodpasture. It was - I would characterize it as
sensitive to the extent that the Chief of Station did not want
the photographs disseminated and the sourte identified,
0611g
NH 50955 DocId: 32277221 Paye 39
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. ING.
---
## Page 40
1-38
2
3
551-2345
5
ó
7
20024
STREET,
REPORTERS BUILDING,
HASHENCION,
10
!
12
13
17
18
19
20
21.
23
24
23
that reason it was considered sensitive. But every project
that we had was also considered sensitive that involved a
source who would be in jeopardy if they were identified.
MI. Goldsmith. If
were to say that his
responsibility with regard to that project was simply to do
the legwork on it and not to act in a supervisory capacity,
would he be telling us the truth?.
Ms. Goodpasture. When he first came there -
Mr. Goldsmith. I believe that calls for a yes or no
answer.
Ms. Goodpasture. I am trying to figure out why someone
would make a statement of that type. He felt, I am sure, as
a young officer that he was only doing the legwork, but so
was I. Because the person who made the decisions was the
Chief of Station and his deputy, and they had the remainder
of the people in the station do the legwork, the running
around, meeting the agents; but when it came to make decisions
they made the big decisions, but I did not make any decisions
over
work, if that is what you are getting at.
MI. Goldsmith. With regards to this particular surveil-
lance operation, did you make the decisions on it, or did
make the decisions on it?
Ms: Goodpasture. He made the decisions on it. As far
as management of the project was concerned --
Mr • Goldsmith.
Miss Goodpasture, what was the procedure
001180
ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HW 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 40
---
## Page 41
1-39
3
30n
PTH STREET,
S.H.
REPORTERS
B011.01Ha.
наЄНУлеТОМ,
=
20024
(202)
551-2345
5
for getting the photographic film from the photography
surveillance site to the station?
Ms. Goodpasture. It was picked up at intervals by
meetings with the person outside.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long did it take?
Ms. Goodpasture. There, again, my memory is faulty.
I think that it was picked up once or twice or three times a
week.
Mr. Goldsmith. What was done with it once it was picked
10
!1
12
13
up?
Ms, Goodpasture.
Pardon me?
Mr. Goldsmith, What was done with it once it was picked
up? What was done with the photographic tape once it was
picked up?
15
Ms. Goodpasture. What happened to it once it was picked
up?
17
18
19.
20
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith. Right.
Ms, Goodpasture. It was brought into the station and
distributed to the people who took action on that product,:
Mr, Goldsmith,
Before it was distributed to the people
In the station, was it developed?
Ms, Goodpasture. Yes, it was developed.
Mr. Goldsmith. It would he picked up, you think,
approximately three times a week,
It would be taken somewhere
for processing and development and they would take it to the
001181
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 41
---
## Page 42
1-40
2
3
20024
(202)
554-2345
7
3
10
2
13
14
30л
7T11
STREET,
S.H.
REPORTERS
ANILDING,
15
17
18
17
20
23
24
23
station and distribute it. Is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long did this overall process
• take?
Ms. Goodpasture. My guess would be about a week from
the time that the film was exposed, but some of the film
might only be two days old or three days old.
In the roll of film, it would. cover a period of one,
two or three days, so that the last day's coverage on the
film would be more recent than the first part of the film.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you give the panel your evaluation
of the efficiency of the photosurveillance operation?
Ms. Goodpasture.
well, I think that it generally was
very good as far as the coverage was concerned. If we asked
them to get a photograph of the events that occurred between
9:00 and 10:00 on such
and such a date, they usually produced
the photographs for that period.
Mr. Goldsmith. What if they were not specifically asked
to focus on a person, as a matter of routine?
How thorough
was the coverage?
Ms. Goodpasture. They covered the categories that we
asked them for on a routine basis, which was to identify any
people who appeared to be non-latin and any Soviets.
MI. Goldsmith, I understand that was the purpose.
Given that purpose, how thorough was the coverage?
Ms. Goodpasture. 'I think it was accurate.
001182
ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC.
WW 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 42
---
## Page 43
1-41
2
3
5
7
3
10
300
2TH
STRECT,
.H. REPORTERS BUTIDING,
12
13
14
15
.15
17
18
19
20
23
2÷
25
MI. Goldsmith. Was Winn Scott satisfied with the
performance of the photo operation at the Soviet Embassy?
Ms. Goodpasture.
To the best of my knowledge he was.
MI. Goldsmith, I would now like you to refer to page
20 of the document that you have before you in Stack A-3.
Seven lines from the bottom in the middle of the page, it says
"However."
Ms. Goodpasture, Wait a minute.
(Pause)
Mr. Goldsmith.
Seven lines from the bottom, starting
with the word "However," I would like for you to read that.
Ms• Goodpasture.
The last,
Mr. Goldsmith.
"However, here again, there was." That
is what I am referring to. Just read that section please.
(Pause)
Is the information contained in that section starting
with "However" until the end of that page, accurate?
Ms• Goodpasture. To the best of my knowledge it is,
but I am not so sure whether or not the cameras used a
separate ioll of film for each day after the assassination or
before, I think it was after the assassination, That part
right here is not clear.
The reason I say it was after that period, because if
you will look at the log of the film that occurred in October
you will note more than one day on thatroll of film.
011183
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
AW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 43
---
## Page 44
2
3
20024 (202)
554-2345
7
10
11
12
13
300 PTH STREET,
$
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
1-42
Mr. Goldsmith. After the photos were taken to the
station, were they reviewed? Were the photographs reviewed?
Ms. Goodpasture. After they came into the station?
Mr. Goldsmith, Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture' Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. Who reviewed them?
Ms. Goodpasture. I
glanced at them and then I gave them
to Herb Minell and he studied them, and if I was looking for
something at the request of Mr. Scott, if he came down and
asked me to go over the photographs for such and such a
period, then I studied them more carefully.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you review, did you give all of
the photographs from the photosurveillance operation of the
Soviet Embassy to Mr. Minell?
Ms, Goodpasture.
Yes. I routed them and then they
went to the file where they were kept, but he had access to
all of them.
Mr. Goldsmith. If Mr. Minell were to have said that
he received only those particular photographs from the Embassy!
operation that you regarded to be of significance, would he
be telling us the truth?
Ms., Goodpasture. I think he would. I think he is
referring - the photographs came in and there was a contact
print on one sheet of paper, also, of those photographs, of
those cases, where we asked
them to look for people who had
001184
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 44
---
## Page 45
I÷43
2
3
5
10
12
OTH STREET.
S.l.
REPORTERS
NUTIDENG,
15
17.
18
19
20
??
23
24
25
car license plate or knew Soviets who had not been there
before or people who were not Latins.
They gave us a 3 x 5 photograph with them in addition to
the sheet, and those 3 x 5 photographs were always given to
MI. Minell to use of to identify the new Soviets or to start
files to try to identify the others. But that was separate
from the file copy, so that may have been what he was
referring to.
Mr. Goldsmith, He was given photographs of significance.
Was he also
given all of the photographs of the Embassy?
Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. He was shown all of the photo
graphs that came. He retained, for his use, the 3 x 5 photo-
graphs, but all the photographs were routed to him.
Mr. Goldsmith, At this time, Mr. Chairman, I would
like to break for any questions that the Committee might have.
Mr. Preyer, I believe we would prefer to complete
the testimony before asking questions.
MI. Goldsmith. I would like to turn now to the photo-
graphic surveillance operation of the Cuban Embassy and
consulate.
What responsibilities, if any, did you have with regard
to that particular operation?
Ms, Goodpasture. At the time, in 1963; none.
MI. Goldsmith. When did you have responsibilities with
regard to that operation?
001186
B"11".
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
NW 50955
Doold: 32277224
Page 45
---
## Page 46
1-m 44
2
3
554-2345
5
ó
2002%
$
10
!!
12
REPORTERS MUTILING.
•13
15
16
S.M.
STREET
18
PTH
17
30n
20
23
24
23
Ms. Goodpasture. When they were first working on the
Cuban Embassy, they asked me if I would help them with the
photographs. I do not remember the exact time now.
Mx. Goldsmith. How many cameras were in operation
surveilling the Cuban Embassy and consulate?
Ms. Goodpasture, I do not know. I am not sure. I
tried to speculate on that, but I am just not sure.
MI. Goldsmith, If you had to estimate, what answer
would you give?
Ms, Goodpasture. I thought that there were two, but
I did not know if they were at the consulate entrance or the
main gate,
MI. Goldsmith. In September and October, 1963, at what
times were the Cuban Embassy and consulate under photo-sur
veillance?
Ms, Goodpasture. What is that?
Mr. Goldsmith. In September and October of 1963, at
what times was the Cuban Embassy and consulate under photo-
surveillance?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. I think the cameras
were malfunctioning during thatperiod, but I am not sure
right now the exact dates, but it should be in the record.
MI. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine, during that
period, what times would there have been coverage?
Ms • Goodpasture. My guess would be that it would be the
001186
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
MH 50955 DooId: 32277221 Page 16
---
## Page 47
1-45
2
3
same as the Soviets when the offices were opered, but it
would be up to their case officer as to what times he ordered
then to work, and the case officer, at that time, was Bob
Shaw.
554-2345
S
9TH
STREET,
S.W.
REPORTERS
BUILDING.
HASHINGTON,
10
11
12
13
17
19
20
21
23
24
23
ME. Goldsmith, In the case of the Cuban Embassy and
consulate, what was the procedure for
getting the photographic
film from the surveillance site to the station?
Ms. Goodpasture, I think that it was similar to that
used for the Soviets, but I did not know the people who brought
it in. I did not bring it in.
Mr, Goldsmith, By whom were the photographs reviewed?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think Bob Shaw,
MI. Goldsmith. Did you review any of those photographs?
Ms. Goodpasture. Not unless they brought one to me to.
just look at it and compare with somebody who may have gone
to the Soviet Embassy, which was the case of this controversial
photograph. that we have.
Mr. Goldsmith.
Were you acting in an informal super-
visory capacity with regard to the surveillance operation?
Ms. Goldsmith, Mr. Shaw was in charge of thisoperation?
Ms, Goodpasture. I think Bob Shaw was in charge of that
operation.
Mr, Goldsmith. How many years had. MI. Shaw been down at
the Mexico City station?
Ms: Goodpasture.
I am not sure. It should be available
001187
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 47
---
## Page 48
]- 46
3
REFORTERS BULLDING.
HACINGTON,
n. C.
20029
( 202)
554-2345
5
ó
7
10
12
13
}4
15
17
300
7TH
19
20
23
21
23
from headquarters. $63 to '65, I think... It is on page 18.
Mr. Goldsmith. Now here-- according to
page 18 of this document, Mr. Shaw was Chief of Cuban
operations:
Ms. Goodpasture. I think Dave Phillips, I believe.
Mr. Goldsmith. You say that Mr. Phillips was the
Chief during this period. According to your document on page
18, you also indicate that Mr. Shaw was the Chief of Cuban
Operations.
Ms, Goodpasture. Because MI. Phillips came down there,
Dave Phillips was the covert action officer and then he was
placed. In charge of Cuban operations, but Bob Shaw had
actually been there before, handling the Cuban operations,
and the other memorandum that you referred to was written when
I was trying -- and I said it had several errors in it,
but. I remember that Bob. Shaw was there working on Cuban.
target. I did not know on what date when I wrote this when
Dave Phillips was named as Chief,
MI. Goldsmith. When Phillips came down, did be replace
Bob Shaw as Chief of Cuban Operations?
Ms: Goodpasture. No, he was there before in another
capacity, then he was named to replace him.
Mr. Goldsmith. Turning to page l9, according to page
19, under the section "Unilateral Photo, Cubans," it says that
during this period, Robert Zambernardi was in charge of the
001188
ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 48
---
## Page 49
1-47
2
3
2002%
(202)
554-2345
8
9
WASHINGTON,
12
13
ITH STREET
REPORTERS
15
is
17
19
20
23
24
25
unilateral photo operations.
Ms. Goodpasture.
These were two photographers, but
they were not case officers. They processed the film.
Mx. Goldsmith. I see.
Ms. Goodpasture. They had no operational responsibility.
MI. Goldsmith. Are you able to evaluate the efficiency
of the Cuban photosurveillance operation?
Ms. Goodpasture. My guess would be that it was just as
efficient when it was operating as the Soviet one.
MI. Goldsmith. With regard to both the photos that were
obtained from the Cuban and the Soviet Embassy and consulates,
what happened to them after they were taken back to the
station and reviewed? Were they stored?
Ms. Goodpasture, They were stored in the main file,
chronological files.
Mr. Goldsmith. During the period when MI. Scott was
there, were any of these photographs disposed of?
Ms. Goodpasture: Yes, Some of the earlier photographs,
before we began to set up formal files in the late 1950's were
not used.
During the period that we are talking about to the best
of my knowledge, in 1963, I do not believe any of the photo-
graphs were destroyed as long as Mr. Scott was there.
Mt. Goldsmith, How long were these photographs retained?
Ms. Goodpasture, As far as I know, they were still there
001189
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 49
---
## Page 50
1-48
3
2002% (202)
554-2345
•. I
REPORTERS BUTLDING,
DACITHOTON.
9
10
11
12
13
15
is
17
300
20
21
23
24
25
when I left in 1968.
Mr. Goldsmith, Are they there now, to your knowledge?
Ms. Goodpasture. Not all the photographs. A year ago
I could not locate all of them.
MI. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, we are
now talking specifically about photographs taken in September
and October of 1963. Now, you just said that, a year ago,
you could not locate them. Did you go to Mexico City to
attempt to locate them?
Ms. Goodpasture. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Where did you go to to attempt to locate
the photographs?
Ms. Goodpasture. I was here in Washington and I looked
through the files, but we did send a cable to Mexico City,
In fact, we sent two cables to them trying to locate the
photographs,
Mr, Goldsmith. What was the response?
Ms. Goodpasture. They could not locate one page of the
photographs.
Mr. Goldsmith. I do not understand the answer.
They
were unable to locate one page?
Ms, Goodpasture. One page.
One page of photographs
they could not locate.
Mx. Goldsmith. Does that mean that all of the other
photographs they were able to locate?
RA1AN3
ANDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 50
---
## Page 51
1-49
3
5
REPORTERS
NUILDING,
paceron,
10
!!
12
13
15
300
PTI
STREET,
17
18
19
20
21
Ms. Goodpasture. Does that mean what? All of the
other photographs?
Yes, We located all of the other files
except for one.
MI. Goldsmith. Do you remember what time period the
page of photographs that you coudd not locate referred to?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right offhand I do not remember, but
I wrote a memorandum for it, which should be in this group of
materials, a cover letter a year ago.
MI. Goldsmith. Specifically with regard to the photo-
graphs that were taken in September and October, 1963, did
the information that you obtained from the Mexico City station
last year indicate that all but one page of those photographs
had been recovered and were available?
Ms, Goodpasture. Yes, to the best of my knowledge,
Mr. Goldsmith. When you say "a page of photographs,"
what are you referring to?
Ms. Goodpasture. In a file which you showed me you
have a copy, it is a contact print of 35 mm. film on one
page,
Mr. Goldsmith. I think I know what you are referring
€0..
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. By "a page," you mean a page that would
contain one of more contact prints on it.:
Ms, Goodpasture. It would contain contact prints from
001191
ALGERSON REPORTING COMFANY. INC.
HW 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 51
---
## Page 52
1-50
2
: 3
30n
7711
STREET,
S.V. REPORTERS BURLOCKG.
WASHINGTON,
Đ.C.
20024
(2012)
554-2345
3
10
12
13
?4
15
18
19
20
21
23
24
• 23
one roll of 35 imm. film. The film we had, but it was that
contact print that was in
the original files that we could
not locate.
Mr. Goldsmith. You still had the film?
MS. Goodpasture. The negatives were avaihable.
Mr. Goldsmith. In that case, what is available from
the Mexico City station are all of the photographs, all of
the photographic negatives or contact prints from the pictures
that were taken at the Soviet and Cuöan Embassies and consul
ates in september and October in 1963, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Were these materials sent to head-
quarters last year?
Ms. Goodpasture. No, I do not think the material we
could not locate was ever sent to headquarters. I think it
was destroyed in the field.
But the other film, all of the negatives concemed in
this photograph had been sent to headquarters before I began
to look for it last year.
It came up in about 1968 or '69 when certain files
were sent to headquarters,
MI. Goldsmith.
For purposes.of clarification, is it
true that, available at headquarters or the Mexico City station
are either the contact prints or the negatives of all of the
pictures that were taken at the Cuban and Soviet Embassy and
001192
ALDERSON
REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
AW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 52
---
## Page 53
1-51
3
5
300
1TH
STREET.
RETORTERS BULLDING.
LASHIMCTON, D.
20024(202)
554-2345
10
12
13•
15
consulate?
Ms, Goodpasture.
YeS a
Mr. Goldsmith.. Is it also true that available in regard
to these materials are the photoproduction lines that are
maintained?
Ms
• Goodpasture.
With the one exception that I
mentioned, the others are all available.
Mr, Goldsmith. Are you saying that there was not a
production log with regard to the contact prints?
Ms• Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith,
The others were all available from the
Cuban and Soviet Embassy and consulates, is that right?
Ms. Goodpasture, Correct.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to turn to the area of
the electronic surveillance operation of the Cuban and
Soviet Embassies and consulates.
How many wiretap operations were in effect with respect
to these embassies and consulates in September and October of
1963?
21
23
24
23
Ms, Goodpasture. Do you mean how many lines were
covered, or how many projects did we have?
When you say
operations, you are referring to unilateral, not a lateral?
Mr. Goldsmith, Let's first talk about the projects.
How
many projects were there?
Ms. Goodpasture. We had one that we ran independently
001193
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 53
---
## Page 54
1-52
2
3
ó
7
3
300
7'111
STREET.
S.M.
REPORTERS RUTLETHE, VAGUERGTON, D.C.
20024
io
'!
12
13
15
i7
18
20
21
23
24
23
and one that was a liaison project.
MI. Goldsmith. The one that was run independently was
referred to as the unilateral project?
Ms : Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. With regard to the one that was run
independently, how many taps did you have in operation
with regard to phones at the Soviet Embassy and consulate?
Ms. Goodpasture.
On the unilateral one?
MI. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms, Goodpasture, I would have to guess without checking
the files.
Mr. Goldsmith. I am Just asking for an estimate.
Ms. Goodpasture. I think -- I do not think that there
was any coverage of the Soviets on the unilateral in September
1963. I think all of that was on the liaison. On the Cubans,
I think there were one or two lines,
Mr. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, again
we are now talking about the period September-October, 1963.
Turning to the liaison project, how many taps were in effect
at the Soviet Embassy?
Ms, Goodpasture, I believe there were five.
MI, Goldsmith. Did you follow whose phones?
Ms, Goodpasture. Do I recall m
Mx.. Goldsmith, On whose phones,
Ms, Goodpasture, Phones?
001194
ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 54
---
## Page 55
1-53
2
3
MI. Goldsmith. Which phones were selected for wire-
tapping purposes?
Ms. Goodpasture.
There was the Chancellory phone, the
Cultural Office. I would have to check the transcripts to be
sure.
7
i0
12
15
16
19
20
23
24
23
The military office was also covered.
Mr. Goldsmith. By whom was the liaison project
coordinated?
I will try to speak up and speak more clearly. In any
event, before I get to the question that I just asked you,
how many phones were tapped at the Cuban Embassy and consulate?
Ms, Goodpasture.
The Cuban Embassy, four or five.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you recall which phones?
• To the best
of your memory, which phones were taped in the Cuban --
Ms, Goodpasture. Four or five.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you recall which ones?
Ms• Goodpasture, Which ones?
Not by menory, but I
listed them all a year ago when I reviewed the transcripts,
so there is a list of all the films that were covered at that
time in the records.
Mr, Goldsmith, Did the Mexicans have any unilateral
coverage with regard to the Soviet and Cuban embassies?
Ms. Goodpasture. The project was joint. They had the
same coverage that we had
MI. Goldsmith. To your knowledge, is it possible that
001195
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC
(NN 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 55
---
## Page 56
1-54.
3
ITH STREET.
REPORTERS BULLDING,
MASHENGTON,
D.C.
20029
(202)
551-2345
5
10
12
3
1S
17
18
17
20
23
24
25
they, themselves, had a unilateral project? It is possible,
but if they had coverage - which I am sure they probably did
have - but they shared with us the coverage from the joint
project:
Mr. Goldsmith. What were your responsibilities with
regard to the wiretapping operations?
Ms. Goodpasture. Legwork and maangement.
Mr, Goldsmith. By management, what do you mean?
Ms. Goodpasture. I recorded all the correspondence,
getting the money, paying the people who did the work, making
sure that the machinery was functioning, picking up all of
the transcripts and supervising most of the people involved
with it, except for the Mexicans.
MI. Goldsmith. In addition to electronic surveillance
ofaa wiretapping nature, were there any "bugs" planted in the
Cuban or Soviet Embassy and consulate?
Ms, Goodpasture. I think there were, but I do not have
firsthand knowledge of them. I think that the best person
to give you the best information on that would be the Cuban
case officers. We never put anything in the Soviet Embassy.
MI. Goldsmith. If you did, would there have been a
transcript made of the conversations that were overheard?
Ms, Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would those transcripts still be on
record at the agency today?:
001196
. ALCERSON PEFORTINE COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 56
---
## Page 57
1-55
2
3
STREET,
S.W.
REPORTERS BUILDING,
MASHINGTON,
D.C.
20024
(202)
554-2345
₴
i0
12
15
17
19
19
20
27
23
24
23
Ms. Goodpasture. They should be.
Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated earlier, I believe, that
there was a list available of the Cuban phones that were
covered by the electronic surveillance operation, is that
correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That thère was
Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated earlier that you either
saw or prepared a list of the phones that were covered by the
surveillance project at the Cuban Embassy and consulate?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know where that list is today?
Ms. Goodpasture. It should be in your records,
MI. Goldsmith. Why do you say it should be?
Ms. Goodpasture. I was told that you had a copy of
all the transcripts and, with those transcripts, there was
list of the lines that were covered, both Cuban and soviet.
Mt. Goldsmith. In addition to the electronic surveil-
lance both of a wiretap and of a bugging nature, did the
Mexico City station have any penetration agents at the Cuban
Embassy?
Ms. Goodpasture.
• I am not sure about the Cuban Embassy.
MI Goldsmith. Did the Mexico City station have any
penetration agents at the Soviet Embassy and consulate?
Ms: Goodpasture.: No,
MI. Goldsmith.:
Are you certain about that answer?
001197
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY INC.
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 57
---
## Page 58
1-56
3
300
ITH STKFFT,
S.V. REPORTERS BULLDING.
WASHINGTON, n.
10
71
12
13
17
18
20
21
23
24
23
Ms, Goodpasture.
Pardon me?
MI, Goldsmith.
Are you certain that there were no
CIA penetration agents?
Ms, Goodpasture. To the best ofamy knowledge, there
were none at the Soviet Embassy.
If there were, I did not
know about them.
MI, Goldsmith. Your answer is the same for the Cuban.
Embassy?
Ms. Goodpasture. The Cuban Embassy, I do not know,
because the Cuban Embassy had locals employed and there were
assets in touch with some of those, locals by the case
officer for the Cuban operations who would be the only person
who would know about that. It is not in the records.
Mr. Goldsmith,
Fine.
Turning to the scope of coverage, at what times were
these lines under electronic surveillance.
Ms, Goodpasture. I think that the equipment was
activated when a telephone conversation took placelon the
liaison lines,
MI, Goldsmith. It would be autonatically activated?
Ms, Goodpasture,
yes
Mr, Goldsmith. Therefore it would not be limited just
to working hours?
Ms, Goodpasture. Yes, or whenever a call occurrec.
MI. Goldsmith. You indicated earlier when you attempted
001158
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
NW 50955
DooId: 32277224
Page 58
---
## Page 59
1-57
2
3
REPORTERS BUTLDING, MASHINCTON.
n. C.
2002%
(202)
554-2305
7
10
12
13
300
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
23
to locate the photograhpic materials in Mexico City there
was one contact page missing, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. There is a log missing and a page
of contact prints --
Mr. Goldsmith, - is missing.
Do you recall what period in September, October of
'63 that page pertained to?
(Pause)
Are. you able to find what you are looking for?
Ms. Goodpasture. There is a memo which I wrote on it.
You should have a copy of it, and I am not sure what date it
is. I thought it was in the papers that you showed me
yesterday.
Mr. Goldsmith. Let me see if I can help you.
If you turn to the materials in Stack A, I think Stack
A-2, is this what you are referring to? Because that is
the only other document pertaining to this area that I showed
you yesterday.
Ms. Goodpasture. A-2.
MI. Goldsmith. I am referring to Stack A-2. Is this
the document that you referred to which would indicate which
contact page was missing?
Ms. Goodpasture. There is another one in which I
mentioned that the folders had been reused, No, it is in this
one
001199
ALOERSON REFORTINO COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 59
---
## Page 60
1-58
3
ó
300
ITH STREET.
S.N: REPORTERS BUTTING,
1261? NOTON,
10
12
13
15
17
17
20
23
24
25
MI. Goldsmith.
please take the time to look through
this document and see if you can find which contact print
for what period is missing.
Ms: Goodpasture.
Right,
(Pause).
Mr. Goldsmith.
If you are unable to find that at this
time, perhaps we could pursue it later. It would be best
to continue with the inquiry
Ms. Goodpasture. Here it is, on page 4.
Mr. Goldsmith. where specifically on page 4?
Ms. Goodpasture. The files contained the photographs
for the period. 2. May '67 to 30: of June '67 were in
a folder that had been used, that was marked to hold files
from the period 23 July '63 until 30 November "63.
Mr. Goldsmith. Let us see if we can.
I get this straight.
First of all, even though the contact prints would not
be available, the original negatives still would be. That
Is correct, is it not?
Ms, Goodpasture. The log for this one base, this one
photographic source, was not available,
Mr, Goldsmith.
The original negatives would still be
available?
Ms, Goodpasture. The negatives are available and the
original photographs are available because they were sent to
Washington, But this file was destroyed, I suppose accidentally.
001200
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 60
---
## Page 61
1-59
3
REPORTERS BUTEDING,
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
7
10
3
300
ITU STREET,
17
19
19
2C
Mr. Goldsmith. All that is missing is the log and the
contact print?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right, which would have been
in that file.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you saying, then, that the 1og
that was kept of the photographs taken during this period,
the entire 10g, from July 23rd '63 to November 30 '63 is no
longer available?
Ms. Goodpasture. Could not be locatédaa year ago.
We were trying to locate it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did this pertain to the Cuban or Soviets?
Ms, Goodpasture. Soviets.
Now; another source that made photographs at the saie
time, their logs are avalable for the same period.
Mr. Goldsmith. I am not sure I am following. What
are you getting at?
Ms. Goodpasture.
That there were three bases, there
were two of those bases that photographed this unidentified
man.
23
24
25
MI. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms, Goodpasture. Well, the logs are not available from
one of those bases but from the other, it is, that you have.
Mr. Goldsmith. When we say the production logs and
the contact prints for this period are missing, that refers
to only one of the three photo sites that were in operation
001201
ALDERSON
REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 61
---
## Page 62
1-60
3
30л
7T11
STREET,
S.W. REPORTERS
BUILDING,
WASHINGTON,
20024
(202)
554-2345
7
10
!
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
23
21
25
at that time.
Ms: Goodpasture.:
That is right.
The third photo site never photographed that man because
he did not appear in the area.
Mr. Goldsmith. We do not know whether they did or did
not, since we do not have the production log.
Ms.
Goodpasture.
We do not have the photographs from
that third source again.
MI. Goldsmith. Getting back to he wiretap operation
how long did it take for the information that was obtained by
the surveillance operation to reach you at the Mexico City
station?
Ms, Goodpasture. I
generally picked it up early in the
morning after the day on which conversation was made.
Mr. Goldsmith. What would you pick up at that time?
Ms ; Goodpasture. I picked up
copies of the transcripts.
Mr. Goldsmith, So, just take one day. To have the
tape transcribed -
Ms; Goodpasture. In most cases, because the transcribers
with the Spanish texts worked at the same place where the
recording machinery was.
Mr. Goldsmith. When you say you picked it up, from whom
did you pick up the transcripts?
Ms. Goodpasture, From an outside agent,:
MI. Goldsmith. Let us get into this procedure in a bit
001222
ALDERSON REPORTIO COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 62
---
## Page 63
1-61
2
3
3
9
10
'!
12
13
REPORTERS
300
ITH STREET,
15
16
17
18
19
20
2!
23
24
25
more detail
There would be a tape recording made, is that correct?
Ms • Goodpasture. A what?
Mr. Goldsmith. A tape recording of the conversation
would be made, is that correct?
Ms • Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. How would that tape recording actually
get to the transcribers, or translaters?
Ms. Goodpasture. The transcribers, or the transcrip-
tions that I picked up, the transcribers were working at the
same place with the Spanish text. If the language were other
than Spanish, it would have to be taken to another location.
to be transcribed. The material that was picked up the day
after the date on which it occurred was in the Spanish
language, normally.
Mr. Goldsmith. If the conversation was in Russian,
would it be taken to Mr. Boris Tarasoff for translation?
Ms: Goodpasture, That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith,
Routinely, how long did it take Mr.
Tarasoff to make the translation?
Ms. Goodpasture.
It depended on his backlog, but
generally it was a delay of a day or two.
Me. Goldsmith. In cases of Russian translations, would
It be fair to say that generally you would receive a transcript
within three or four days?of the time that the conversations
091*==
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC.
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 63
---
## Page 64
1-62
2
3
5
551-2345
300
7TH
STREET,
S.V.
REFORTERS BUILDING.
9
10
12
13
14
15
1á
17
were made?
Ms, Goodpasture.
Yes,
MI. Goldsmith. Do you know who took the tapes to Mr.
Tarasoff for transcription?
Ms • Goodpasture.
Yes, the same man who brought them
to me, the outside agent of the liaison project.
Mx. Goldsmith. Who was that individual.
Ms, Goodpasture. His name was Flick.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was there anybody else besides MI.
Flick that was responsible?
Ms., Goodpasture,
Herbert Minell.
Mr. Goldsmith. I believe I asked you yesterday to
describe Mr. Flick and you described him as looking like me.
Are you able to.
give a more definite description today of
MI. Flick?
Ms, Goodpasture. Well, he. looks like an All-American
boy-
20
23
24
23
ME, Goldsmith. Thank you.
This Mr. Flick was approximately 5 feet six inches tall?
Ms. Goodpasture. He seemed taller than that to me.
MI. Goldsmith. How old was he in 1263?
Ms, Goodpasture.
He must have been about 45 and if I
missed it by a few years, he probably would not like it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Once the transcripts were brought.to
you, would you review all of then?
001204
ALCERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC.
HN 50955
DocId: 32277224 : Page 64
---
## Page 65
1- 63
20024
(202)
2
3
5
7
3
10
300
ITH STREET,
REPORTERS
nurturi.
WASHINGTON,
12
13
15
1ó
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture.:
Not always because they were routed
to the people who took the action on them, and in the case
of some of those transcripts, there was a stack about an
inch or so thick, and if you took the time to read them, then
the people who had to take the action on them did not get to
see them, so I generally took them and passed them out.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you review most of them?
Ms. Goodpasture. I had more than one copy so I could
look at them, if there was something of significance.
Mr. Goldsmith. I am not sure that I am following you.
As a matter of routine you would review it, or would you
pass it along?
Ms. Goodpasture. I would pass it along, first. I kept
one
copy myself for files and I had access to that copy.
Mr. Goldsmith. In the case of transcripts from the
Soviet compound, they woüld go to Mr. Minell, is that correct?
Ms, Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith.
From the Cuban compound, it would go
to whom?
Ms. Goodpasture. It went to Bob Shaw.
MI. Goldsmith. Or Dave Phillips?
Ms. Goodpasture. Or Dave Phillips.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long were the tapes maintained?
Ms. Goodpasture. About two weeks.
Mr. Goldsmith. What happened to the tapes after
the two-
001205
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 65
---
## Page 66
1-64
2
3
7
3
week period?
Ms. Goodpasture. They were erased and reused.
Mr. Goldsmith. They would be erased for the purpose
of reuising, did you say?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes:
Mr. Preyer. "Let me interrupt counsel. That is our
second bell, We have to go to the Floor to answer the quorum
call. Miss Goodpasture has been at it quite awhile now, so
I suggest that we take about a ten-minute recess at this
time.
10
11
1 2
13
15
300
17
18
19
20
73
24
25
We will recess for about ten minutes,
(A brief recess was taken,)
Mx. Preyer. The Committee will resume when counsel is
ready to resume his questions.
MI, Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, getting back to the
area of the wiretap operations of the Cuban and Soviet
embassies, would you indicate to the Committee in what manner
the photosurveillance and the wiretap operations were tied
into each other?
Ms. Goodpasture. On a wiretap operation, if we got
information that someone was
going to one of those places far
in adyance, we would notify the people taking the photographs
to try to get pictures of them.
That was one way we were tied in, Another way we were
tied in was if we saw where a person had been there at such
001206
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HY 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 66
---
## Page 67
1-65
2
3
300
7111
STREET,
REPORTIES
BUILDING.
MACHINGTON,
п. с.
20024 (202)
554-2345
3
10
11
12
13
15
13
18
17
20
?1
and such a time, we would check back to see if there was
a photograph made during that period and if there was any
way that that person could be identified.
Mr. Goldsmith. Similarly, if there was a tape-recording
made of a conversation and from the conversation it became
apparent that the person at issue was either at one of the
embassies or was going to go to one of the embassies, it would
be possible, would it not, to go to the photo-production logs
and determine who that person was?
Ms. Goodpasture. We could determine if there was a
photograph there and if the photograph appeared to be the same
person that came
upon the wiretap.
Now, there might be someone speaking English and the only
photograph that we had was someone that was obviously a Latin
whom we knew who did not speak English. We could rule him out!
as being the person who made the call.
Mr. Goldsmith. In what manner would this procedure take
place if you knew that someone was either going to the Embassy
or that he was there at a particular time? How would you go
about checking to see if you had a photograph of that person?
Ms. Goodpasture. If we knew afterwards that he had been
there?
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith.
yeS.
Ms. Goodpasture. We would take the coverage for that day,
look at it, and see if he was there.
0N1207
ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 67
---
## Page 68
1-66
?
3
2002%
(202)
554-2345
7
300 77H
STREET,
S.W.
REPORTERS
nuttninG,
CASIOUSTON,
10
12
13
15
17
18
19
20
* 1
23
24
25
Mr. Goldsmith.
You would not confine yourself just to
a specific time that day? You would examine the entire day's
coverage?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes.
The log was prepared in such
way that they listed the time and the description of the
person who went there.
Mr. Goldsmith. I believe earlier you testified as a
matter of routine, the photo-surveillance operations would
take pictures of foreigners - in other words, a non-Mexican
and of Soviet or Cuban personnel, is that true?
Ms. Goodpasture. Soviet, yes. Well, I do not know
about the Cubans, but I can say that for sure for the Soviets.
Mr. Goldsmith. They would take the photograph of some-
one who did not fit that category if they were given notice
in advance that someone happened to be of interest, is that
correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
(Pause)
Mr. Preyer. We have another vote on the House Floor.
I suggest that we take another moment while I go over and
vote. We will recess for about five minutes.
(A brief recess was taken.)
MI. Preyer. The Committee will resume.
You may resume questioning.
Mr. Goldsmith.
Thank you.
001208
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 68
ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 69
1 - 67
2
3
20024 (202)
7
3
ITH STREET.
47
REPORTERS BUILDING,
PENNGTON,
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
13
24
25
Miss Goodpasture, who would give notice to the photo
surveillance units to take a picture of a particular individual.
Ms. Goodpasture. Would you repeat that, please?
Mr. Goldsmith. Certainly•
Let us assume that it is decided that a particular
individual is important and should be photographed.
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes.
MI. Goldsmith, Who would give notice to the photo-
surveillance units of.that fact?
"Ms. Goodpasture. The case officer handling the project.
That would have been
Mr. Goldsmith. Assuming, for example, that one of the
people monitoring the wiretap operation picked up a conversa-
tion that the person regarded to be significant and in that
conversation it became apparent that something was of interest
Would it be standard procedure for that person to call
directly to the photo-surveillance sites?
Ms. Goodpasture. No, because that person did not know
any of the people onducting the photo-surveillance. Now I
think in the case of the unilateral operation which was
also handled unilaterally, wiretap operation, it was also
handled by
I am not sure if they would contact
the photo people of not, but my people could not contact the
photo people. They would have to come in to me and I would
write a note, give it to Tom, and Tom went out and notified
001209
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. ING
AH 50955
DooId: 32277224 Page 69
---
## Page 70
1-68
2
3
AULINING.
MACINCTON, D
20024
554-2345
5
ó
7
10
!
2
3
15
17
300
20
73
24
25
the photo people.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long would it take for notice to
be given?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, the length of time that it would
take to call somebody and locate them and talk to them,
normally we did not give them that information on the telephone.
It could be one day, two days, or three days.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would it be possible for the individual
monitoring the telephone conversation to call his case officer
directly, or to call you directly?
Ms. Goodpasture. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. To call the case officer directly and
then for the case officer to immediately contact the photo-
surveillance operations and tell them to take a picture of
a particular individual?
Ms. Goodpasture.
In the case of
s operation,
it would, but in the case of the ones I handled, it would
not, They had to go through the person whom I met outside,
then he got in touch with me and I gave the notice to Tom
and Tom took it to his people.
MI. Goldsmith.
You are drawing a distinction now between
the operations
handled and those which you handled.
What is the distinction you are making? Which operations did
he handle?
Ms. Goodpasture. He handled the unilateral telephone
001210
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 70
---
## Page 71
1-69
2
3
30n
TE STREET.
S.W. REPONTERS BUTLDING.
DASHINGTON.
o.C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
10
2
15
lá
17
18
19
20
23
24
23.
operations.
MI. Goldsmith. You handled?
Ms. Goodpasture. The liaison and the agents in the
unilateral operation and the agents in the liaison operation
did not know each other, to the best of our knowledge, were
not aware of each other's operations.
Mr. Goldsmith. We may have covered this before, however
I would like to clarify this point in terms of the photo
production logs from the surveillance operations from the
Cuban Embassy and consulate and Soviet Embassy and consulate.
Those materials were all available the last time you knew
with the exception of that particular contact page, and the
photoproduction page pertaining to that contact page, is
that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. You mean available now?
MI. Goldsmith. Right.
Ms, Goodpasture. They are available, yes.
That is
correct.
Mr. Goldsmith. On the transcripts that were made of
the telephone conversations, would the transcript have an
indication of the telephone line that was being tapped?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. And the location of the telephone?
In
other words, the soviet Embassy, Cuban Embassy?
Ms. Goodpasture. There would be a cryptonym which would
001211
NH 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 71
ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 72
1-70
2
JON ATI STREET.
S.V. REPORTERS BULLDING,
LASHTICTON,
n. C.
20024
(202)
554-2345
5
9
!!
12
13
14
is
17
19
20
identify it.
Mr. Goldsmith. It would also give the time of the
telephone call, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to get into the area
of the relationship between the Agency's surveillance opera-
tions and Lee Harvey Oswald.
In that regard, I would like to draw your attention to
Stack B. I believe it is going to be handed to you right.
now, Miss Goodpasture.
(Pause)
I would like you to refer to page 1 in Stack B.
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes:
Mr. Goldsmith. Can you identify this document?
Ms. Goodpasture, This looks like a copy of the trans-
cript, a xerox copy of the transcript.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you please read the content of
this first page, the person that is marked off starting by
line 151 or starting with the line designated in the left
151.
23
24
Ms. Goodpasture. Are you referring to the last lines?
Mr. Goldsmith. No. I am refering to the middle of the
page, in the lefthand column, where it says number 151.
Ms. Goodpasture. 151. That is the space on the tape
where this conversation took place.
. If that tape were put on
001212
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 72
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 73
1-71
1
3
7
3
PEPORTERS RULIDING,
MASHINCION,
11
12
13
14
15
i7
300
ITH STREET.
19
20
21
23
24
23
the same machine that it was recorded on and started at 0,
this would come up on 151. It would not apply on any other
machine of starting at any other number.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you read the conversation that
follows immediately next to 151.
(Pause)
What does the designation "MO" signify?
Ms. Goodpasture. Man outside.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does that mean a man outside making a
phonecall inside?
Ms. Goodpasture. That means that this telephone call,
that it was a man from outside of where the telephone was
who called in.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine.
Is it possible to tell from page 1, at approximately what
time this call came in? I will direct your attention to the
top of the page, of page I.
Ms. Goodpasture: I know. I am looking for - it was
sometime after 9:55.
Mr. Goldsmith. The upper righthand portion of this
page indicates that the call came in on October 1, 1963, is
that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. At the bottom of the page there is some
writing in script, cursive. I draw your attention to that at
001212
play 50955 DocTa: 32377224 Page 73
ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 74
1-72
2
300 2111
STREET,
S.H.
REPORTERS
BUILDING
MASHU NOTON,
20024(202)
554-2345
7
this point.
Ms. Goodpasture. It is a number for the Russian Embassy.
Mr. Goldsmith. Which would be the number for the
Russian Embassy, 15-16-55?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. What do the other numbers signify?
Ms. Goodpasture.:
The other numbers refer to numbers
that were used on the machine doing the recording.
Mr. Goldsmith. The number 0921-1320. What does that
Ms. Goodpasture. The hours that were covered on that
10
!!
12
13
reel.
MI. Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, when did the informa-
tion contained in this transcriptifirst come to your atten-
tion?
•15
1á
17
1
20
21
23
24
Ms. Goodpasture.. Probably the day after it was recorded.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was that the first time that Lee Harvey
Oswald came to your attention?
Ms • Goodpasture.
Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. What action, if any, did you take upon
receiving this information?
Ms. Goodpasture.
What action?
MI. Goldsmith. Right. How did you respond to receiving
this ifnormation?
Ms. Goodpasture, Well, the tape, the reel, was taken
to the Russian transcribei. Now I am not sure whether that
001214
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 74
---
## Page 75
1-73
3
J00 PTI STREET,
s.V.
REPORTERS
BULLDING,
HASHTUSTON,
n.C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
ó
3
12
13
14
1j
man who brought me the conversation took the reel to the
transcriber, or whether Herb Minell did, but normally, one
or the other would carry the reel out to the Russian trans-
criber.
Mr. Goldsmith. So, when you say that this information
first came to your attention a day or two after the conversa-
tion was made --
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you saying that you received the
conversation in its original form in Russian?
Ms. Goodpasture.: No, I received a transcript.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did the transcript -
Ms. Goodpasture. Which said there was a call made.
was
; a Spanish transcript and in Spanish, it said there was a
call being made by a man who was trying to speak. Russian and
gave the name Oswald, I believe. I do not happen to have a
copy, but you should have a copy of it.
Mr. Goldsmith. This transcript was taken to Mr. Tara-
17
18
17
20
21
soff?
23
24
23
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. When was the first time you actually
saw the Russian translation of the conversation?
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
MI. Goldsmith. When was the first time that you actually
saw the conversation after it had been translated from Russian
001215
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 75
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 76
1-74
3
3O0 PTI STREET
S.W.
REPORTERS BULLDING, MASHLUCTON,
D.C. 20024 (202)
554-2345
7
10
!!
12
13
15
17
18
20
23
24
23
into English?
Ms. Goodpasture. Probably when I got a file copy back
from Herb Minnel, within a few days after this, but I do not
know the exact date right off.
Mr. Goldsmith.
What was your response at that point,
if any?
Ms. Goodpasture.
A cable was sent to Headquarters
by Mrs: Minell.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you direct Mrs. Minell to send a
cable to headguarters?
Ms: Goodpasture. No, I did not, because Mr. Minell was
my superior. He would have been directed by the Chief -- I
say he was my superior. He outranked me in grade.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who sent the cable, Mr. or Mrs. Minell?
Ms. Goodpasture. His wife, but he had his own section
and he had a separate section from the one I was in. We did
not direct each other. We might have suggested it, but he
took his orders from the Chief of Station.
MI. Goldsmith. Did you suggest to Mrs. Minell-
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not remember whether I did or
not.
"I may have
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you, or anyone else, check the
transcripts that were obtained from the Soviet Embassy
• from
September 28th?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think I checked them at that
001216
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 76
ALOEASON REFORTING COMPANY. ING.
---
## Page 77
1-75
time.
2
3
REFCRIFAS BUTLDING,
WASHINGTON, D.C. 2002%
(202)
554-2345
ó
7
8
10
12
13
300
7TI STREET,
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
23
MI. Goldsmith. The significance of the question is as
follows. Drawing your attention to the third line after the
number 151, it says: "Hello. This is Lee Oswald speaking.
I was at your place last Saturday."
well, October 1, 1963 was a Tuesday, the 28th was a
Saturday. I am wondering whether anyone went back to check
onthe transcripts of telephone conversations. on that day of
the photo-production materials for that day?
Ms. Goodpasture. Theonly indication of the name was
from the telephone transcripts.
MI. Goldsmith. Yes:
Ms. Goodpasture. On that day. That was when we first
found out that he was there.
Mr. Goldsmith. On October Ist, you found out that
Oswald had been at the Russian Embassy the preceding Saturday.
Was any effort made to check your materials from the surveil
lance operation, the photographic surveillance operation, or
from the telephonic surveillance operation to get additional
information: on this?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know whether I checked it
immediately or not at this stage. I do know that they were
checked thoroughly after the assassination, In fact, I
think they were checked thoroughly after the information came
back from Washington identifying a Lee Oswald. The files were
091217
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 77
---
## Page 78
1-76
3
300 11H
STREET. S.W.
REPORTERS
BUILDING,
VASMINCION, D.C. 2002% (202)
554-2345
7
10
12
15
17
18
19
20
checked at that time to find out if we had any record of a
person named Lee or a person named Oswald.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. Let's stay to this time period
for a moment, however.
Would it have not been standard operating procedure
if
the transcript refers to a person who appeared at the Embassy
a few days earlier, would it not have been standard operating
procedure for either you or someone else in the Mexico City
station. to check your records. from that earlier day, September
28th, to see if, in fact, you had a photograph of this person
or another tape recording of his voice?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think that it would have been stan-
dard practice to have done a file check on him.
MI. Goldsmith. Is the answer to my question yes?
Ms. Goodpasture. To check the record files to see if
we have a record of that name previously, but to check back
on the transcripts, I did not process the transcripts from
the Soviet Embassy as such. Whether MI. Minell or MrS. Minell
went back and reviewed those again at that time, I do not
knoW •
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith. The text of this conversation includes,
in brackets, what apparently is an insertion by the transla-
tor. He says the same person who phoned a day or so ago
and
spoke in broken Russian:
In light of that statement by the translator, in light
001218
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 78
---
## Page 79
1-77
3
5
7
JON ITH STREET
5.W.
REPORTERS BULLDING,
WASHINGTON.
D. C.
20024
10
12
13
15
17
19
.20
21
23
24
of that statement by the person who identifies himself as
Oswald that he, Oswald, had been there Saturday and the trans
lator was saying that this person had phoned a day or so
ago, would it not have been standard operating procedure to
have checked?
Ms, Goodpasture, Yes, I think it would have.
Mr. Goldsmith. The photo materials and the wiretap
materials?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Also, it would have been done
autonatically in the base by the Mexicans.
Mr. Goldsmith.' Fine.
At that time, was any photograph found of lee Harvey
Oswald?
Ms. Goodpasture. The only photograph that was located
ten Meren
no, not of oswald.. We had no photograph of him.
MI. Goldsmith. At that time, were you able to locate
the earlier tape recording containing a conversation involving
this same individual?
Ms, Goodpasture. I did not, but I do not know if the
Minell's put those taperecordings or not at that time. I
assume that they probably did. I know that they were put
together in November.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would now like you to refer to pages
2 and 3 in Stack. B, and I ask you if you can identify what
these materials are.
001219
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 79
ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY INC.
---
## Page 80
1-78
2
3
5
30n
TTI STREET.
S.W.
REPORTERS BUrNING,
NASHYNCTON, D. C.
20024
(202)
554-2345
3
10
12
•13
14
13
17
13
20
71
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture.
Page
• 2?
MI. Goldsmith. Page 2 and 3 of the materials contained
in Stack B, 2 and 3, the next two pages.
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Can you identify these materials?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. They also appear to be copies
of portions of the transcripts.
Mr. Goldsmith. On what date was this conversation
transcribed? I withdraw that question. Let me rephrase it,
please.
On what date, according to this document, did this
conversation take place?
Ms • Goodpasture.
28 September 1963.
Mr. Goldsmith. What was the telephone that was the
source of this conversation?
Ms. Goodpasture, The Soviet Embassy. The conversation
was recorded on the Soviet Embassy telephone, It came in
from a woman from the consulate, the Cuban consulate.
MI. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to the number 208
in the middle of the page, on the line adjacent to that.
number, it says, please see that the Spanish transcription,
it says "wo."
Does that stand for woman outside?
Ms. Goodpasture. That was written by Tarasoff.
MI. Goldsmith. Right. That would indicate woman out-
side?
Telephone call from a woman outside?
001220
HH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 80
ALDERSON PEPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 81
3
REPORTERS BUILDING,
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
3
10
!1
13
14
15
300
PTH STREET,
17
18
19
20
23
21
15
1-79
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes. When he prepared the transcripts,
he prepared them on
a separate sheet of paper and he put them
in there so that the person would tie it in with the Spanish
transcript, and what they have done here is they cut off
the top of the page, the transcript that Tarasoff did, and
pasted it to the Spanish transcripts.
Mr. Goldsmith. Have you seen this particular document,
or a copy of it, before?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, my name is on it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Your name appears in the upper right-
hand portion?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes
MI. Goldsmith. When was the first time that you saw
either this particular document, or a copy of it?
Ms. Goodpasture. Within a couplerof days after it
was transcribed.
Mr. Goldsmith. What action, if any, did you take in
response to seeing this particular document?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think I took any. I think
Minell was the one who would have taken the action on this!
MI. Goldsmith. At the time that you received the
transcript. containing the conversation of October Ist, do
you recall this earlier transcription of the conversation?
Ms, Goodpasture. No, I do not think I did, because I
did not read all of these transcripts. When I brought them
001221
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page B1
ALOEASON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 82
1-80
3
MACHINGTON.
D.C.
20029
(202)
554-2345
5
7
3
10
13
14
15
30п
ITH STREET
en
REFORFERS
17
18
19
20
21
23
2=
25
in, I passed them out, and the one on the 28th of September
would have gone automatically to Mr. Minell. The one on
I October, unless it was very unusual or my attention woüld
have béen called to it, I would not have been doing an
analysis of them.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether the Minells. linked
the two conversations together?
Ms. Goodpasture, I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you or the Minell's check the
photo production materials after seeing this particular
conversation?
Ms. Goodpasture. After seeing the name Lee Oswald, I
think that the photo production materials for that day had
not been received, as. I recall, and a note was given to
tO
go out and pick up the film for this period and
bring it in. The transcripts were usually received before
the photographs were.
MI. Goldsmith. At such timethat thephotographs were
received, did you or anyone else go to check. the photoproduc-
tion materials to see if you could identify the individual?
Ms• Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you recall when that happened?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. As I remember, we were waiting
for that material to come in, and when it came in, we looked
at it together and decided that there was one man who was
not
001222
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 82
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY INC.
---
## Page 83
1-81
2
3
RIGHTERS
BUILDING,
MACHINGTON. n. C. 2002%
(202)
551-2345
$
10
!!
!3
14
15
300
ITH STREET,
17
18
19
20
23
24
23
a Latin.
MI. Goldsmith. This conversation came in at approxi-
mately 11:51 a.I., is that correct, on September 28th?
Ms Goodpasture. This conversation was recorded at
1151 hours on the 28th. The 28th was on a Saturday. We
would have gotten it probably on Monday, following the 28th.
Then it would have
gone out to Mr. Tarasoff who would
have made a trnaslation from the Russian.
Mr. Goldsmith. You said that you waited to receive the
photographs and, upon receiving the photographs of production,
you checked these materials, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
MI. Goldsmith. Upon checking the photograph of produc-
tion from September 28th, did you find a photograph of Lee
Harvey Oswald?
Ms. Goodpasture. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you find a photograph of some other
North American appearing male?
Ms • Goodpasture.
We found a photograph of a non-latin,
a man who appeared to be a non-Latin,
MI. Goldsmith. That photograph was taken on September
28, 1963. In other words, these are the production materials
you were checking?
Ms. Goodpasture. There were three sets, He appeared
on the 28th, I believe, and on the indond. I am
not sure. it
001222
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 83
ALCERSON RESORTINO COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 84
1-82
2
3
REPORTERS BUILDTNG.
MASHENGTON, D.C.
20024
( 202). 554-2345
10
12
13
ITH STREET
15
15
17
18
17
20
13
24
25
is in the logs, the date that the man appeared there.
Mr. Goldsmith. Now, Saturday, September 28th, drawing
your attention to that day, would that have been a day when
the Embassy, either the Cuban Embassy or Russian Embassy,
would have been open?
Ms. Goodpasture. Not to the public, I do not think,
but somebody could have
gone there and rung the doorbell and
may have been received by the guard on duty.
Mr. Goldsmith. Saturday was not really a working day,
is that correct?
Ms • Goodpasture. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. I am a bit confused, now. Earlier in
your téstimony I recall your indicating that the photo-surveil
lance operation was coordinated with the working hours of the
embassies:
Here we have a situation where the embassies were
not working.
Ms, Goodpasture.. I think the photograph was the 27th,
not the 28th. I made a mistake:
Mr. Goldsmith. If I may finish, here we have a situation
where the photograph was taken on the 28th. This was a
Saturday. If the photograph were taken on the 28th then, in
fact, the photo-surveillance operation was in effect on a
Saturday, which was a non-working day for the Cuban and
Soviet embassies, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. If the photograph was made on the 28th,
001224
ALIERSON REPORTING COMPANY. ING.
HN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 84
---
## Page 85
1-83
2
3
3O0 PTH STREET,
S.l.
REFORTERS BUrtDING.
MASHINCTON,
D.C.
2002%
02
554-2.
3*5
7
10
12
15
18
19
.20
23
24
it was not a working day, a Saturday. But the photo base
houses were places where people lived and if they saw some-
thing that they thought was unusual, they could make a pic-
ture anytime they wanted to and send it in. But they were
normally required to be on duty during the times when the
Embassy had working hours.
Does that explain it?
Mx. Goldsmith. That may explain it in part. I think
we should pursue this just a bit.
The photograph that you found of a person going to one
of these embassies was taken on September 28th, is that
correct?
Ms, Goodpasture. I would have to look at them to
see.
Right now I am a little confused about that nyself,
because this man appeared there several times, but we have
copies of those and the dates on them. I do not know if they
are here of not, but I went through the files that we had to
put those dates on.
Mt. Goldsnith. I am afraid that none of the materials
that yourand. I reviewed yesterday pertained to September 28th
or even September 27th, so I am unable to show you any produc-
tion materials for those two days.
Ms. Goodpasture. It was not the 28th. They are not
here. I guess it was on the 2nd of October that he appeared
the first time.
001225
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 85
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. ING.
---
## Page 86
1-84
2
3
20024
(202)
554-2345
5
10
5.11.
REPORTERS
BUILDING.
12
13
15
17
18
17
20
31
23
24
25
Mr. Goldsmith. You are saying now that you are not
sure whether you found the photograph of September 28th?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not have them here, but I did
get all the photographs of that man, together with the dates
on them, which I think you have. When I was looking here on
this 28th transcript, I said 28th and what I was "thinking
was that when we checked the photographs for the days around
the time of the call, we found the photograph, but I do not
know what day it was now, right off the top of my head.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you find a photograph of just one
person who appeared to be North American in appearance?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith.
How many days' photographic surveillance
coverage did you review?
Ms. Goodpasture. How many days?
Mr. Goldsmith, Right.
Ms. Goodpasture.
They were the same days that were
mentioned in the transcripts.
MI. Goldsmith. Four or five days?
Would that be a
fair estimate?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Right.
Mr. Goldsmith.
I notice Mr. Shaw's name on this, on
the top of the page, page 2, Why would his name be up there?
Ms, Goodpasture. His name would be on here because the
telephone call came from a woman from the Cuban Embassy, but
NN1226
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 86
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 87
1-85
2
3
ó
JON ITI STREET,
S.V.
REFORTERS BULLDING,
LASHTICION.
10
!!
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
21
25
he was responsible for the Cuban Embassy coverage.
The first line of that says woman from the consulate,
Cuban Embassy.
MI. Goldsmith. Why did this particular document go to
Shaw rather than to Dave Phillips?
Ms. Goodpasture. Because Shaw had handled most of the
routine work and I think he
was the one who read all of the
transcripts. But to be perfectly exact about it, I am not
too sure. I suppose Dave Phillips did not have time to read
the transcripts and Shaw was the one who reviewed them
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it possible in fact that the photo-
graph. that you found was thephotograph that was taken on
September 28th, 1963?
Ms, Goodpasture. To answer your question we would have
to check the log because the log has the date of the photo-
graphs and a copy of the photograph attached to it.
Mr. Goldsmith. In any event, with regard to the conver-
sation of October Ist and the conversation of October 28th;
these came to your attention right around that time period
as
opposed to some time after the assassination, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. The conversations that had the name
in it, Lee Oswald, came to my attention right after the
conversation occurred.
MI. Goldsmith, The conversation of the 28th, when did
that first come to your attention?
001227
WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 87
ALDERSON REFORTINE COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 88
1- 86
2
3
REPONCERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON,
n. C.
20024
( 202)
8
10
?!
12
13
15
17
300
ITH STREET,
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not recall seeing it until after
the assassination.:
MI. Goldsmith. However, was your testimony earlier to
the effect: that upon receiving the conversation reflected on
page 2, the September 28th, 1963 conversation, and after it
was made, to locate a picture of the person who was going to
the Russian Embassy, you did indicate that, did you not?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, this conversation may have
been tied into the Oswald conversation by the Russian trans-
criber because he did both of them about the same time.
There was only one day's difference. It
is logical
to assume that he would have recognized the voice, and we
probably had both transcripts at the same time looking for a
man when we were examining the photographs.
Mr, Goldsmith. This, in all likelihood, would have
been brought to your attention,
Ms• Goodpasture. When?
Mr. Goldsmith, Shortly after September 28th?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right. If it was with the lee Oswald
19
20
21
one..
23
24
MI. Goldsmith, Do you recall personally screening the
photo production materials to try to locate a photograph of
Oswald, or the person who identified himself as Oswald?
Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. I think almost everyone in the
station looked at those photographs after the assassination,
001228
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HM 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 88
---
## Page 89
1-87
2
JON PIN STREET
S.V.
REPORTERS
BULL.DING.,
MACINGTON,
n. C.
20024
(202)
551-2315
10
12
13.
15
1é
18
19
20
23
24
25
but MI. Minell and I looked at them after, his wife and I
examined them after the Oswald name first appeared.
Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, this conversation did come
to your attention well before the assassination?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was there anything, in your opinion,
unusual about Oswald's being at the Cuban Embassy on a
Saturday?
Ms: Goodpasture. I do not think that the Cuban Embassy
connection was tied in until afterwards, I do not know®
There were two calls on the 27th to the Cuban Embassy.
MI. Goldsmith, I will rephrases the question. It is
apparently that, on September 28, 1963, Oswald, according to
this conversation, was at the Cuban Embassy.
That is where
the conversation was made from, so at that day he was at the
Cuban Embassy. You indicated that that would not have been
a working day for the Cuban Embassy, is that correct?
Ms, Goodpasture. The photo-surveillance, you mean?
Mr. Goldsmith, Saturday would not have been a working
day for the Cuban Embassy.
Ms, Goodpasture. That/is right.
MI. Goldsmith. Was there anything unusual about
Oswald's being at the Cuban Embassy on a day that was not a
working day?
Ms. Goodpasture. No, because foreigners were going to.
001229
NW 50955 DooId: 32277224
Page 89
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 90
1-88
2
3
7
3
300 7111
STREET,
5.1.
REPORTERS
BUTIRiNG,
DASHINGTON;
10
11
i2
13
F.
15
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
both places and ringing the door bell and the gate-keeper
frequently let them in on days other than working days.
Mr. Goldsmith. If it is true that foreigners were
frequently visiting the embassies on days other than working
days, then why was the photo-surveillance operation confined
to working days?
Ms. Goodpasture. Because the people could not work
around the clock. They had to have some time off. One of
the photographers, as I recall, was apart-time student, or
something, but it was not possible to have that thing going
all the time.
I think later maybe it set up a mechanical type surveil-
lance that ran continuously.
Mr. Goldsmith. However, there were three different
camera sites?
Ms. Goodpasture. They did not all hit the same place.
MI. Goldsmith. Is it not possible, despite staffing
problems; that on Saturday and Sunday at least one of the
photo sites could have been maintained?
Ms. Goodpasture. It could have been possible if we had
been working, if our photographers had been American citizens
and staff agents, but we were working with Mexicans and not
many of them worked on sundays, normally. That was their day
off.
MI. Goldsmith, How about Saturdays?
001230
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY INC.
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 90
---
## Page 91
1-89
2
3
20024
10
300 7711
STREET
S.W.
REPORTENS B011016,
12
13
17
18
19
20
23
24
23
Ms: Goodpasture. I do not know. You would have to
talk to the case officer because it was determined that it
just was not feasible to use them on Saturdays and Sundays.
Mr. Goldsmith. Even though there were three different
surveillance sites?
Ms. Goodpasture. There were three different photo
surveillances, but they all did not cover the same spot.
Mr. Goldsmith. Even though there were three different
surveillance operations of each Embassy on non-working days,
all three were shut down, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right, to the best of my
knowledge.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to refer you to pages
4 through 6 of the documents contained in Stack B. Most of
them are in Spanish, I believe. There is a summary transla-
tion on page 6;
The pages are identified in the lower righthand corner
of the page, Can you identify these documents?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. They appear to be copies of
the transcripts, of portions of transcripts.
MI. Goldsmith. What was the date of the conversation
that was reflected in this transcript?
Ms, Goodpasture. The one on page 4 is dated 21 Septem-
ber 1963 g
Mr. Goldsmith. At what time did this conversation take
001231
HM 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 91
ALGERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 92
1-90
2
place, directing your attention to page number 6.
Ms. Goodpasture.
About five minutes after 4:00.
Mr. Goldsmith.
What was the source of this conversa-
tion?
REPORTERS BUTInING.
MASHTNGTON, D. C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
Ms. Goodpasture.
The source was the liaison. The
•10
!!
12
13
STRELT,
15
1á
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
source?
MI. Goldsmith. Which telephone was being tapped?
Ms. Goodpasture. The Soviet Embassy telephone.
Mr. Goldsmith. This was an incoming call, is thät
correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. It was an incoming call from the
Cuban consulate.
Mr. Goldsmith. On page 6, to the right of the numbers
in parentheses, 1605, it says; IN. What does that stand for?
Ms • Goodpasture.
.. 1605 is the hour the call occurred.
Mt. Goldsmith. Right. IN, What does that stand for?
Ms• Goodpasture. In.
MI, Goldsmith. OV, what does that stand for?
Ms. Goodpasture.
That would be the voice outside.
MI. Goldsmith. Have you ever seen this document, or
copy of it, before?
Ms • Goodpasture.
Seen what?
MI. Goldsmith. Have you ever seen this document, or a
copy of it, before?
Ms Goodpasture.
I have seen what I think was a copy
001232
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC
HY 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 92
---
## Page 93
1-91
2
(202)
ITH STREET,
S.V.
REPORTERS BUILDING.
WASHENGTON,
12
13
14
15
8
20
of this document before, but this translation is a summary,
not a translation, and when we reviewed this a year ago we
determined that it was not correct and a new transcription
was made.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that you determined that it
was correct in substance, however it was not complete?.
Ms. Goodpasture. No. It gave the wrong impression
in substance.
Mr. Goldsmith.: At this time, I would like to draw your
attention to document B-1, which is attached to Stack B,
just two pages.
Ms • Goodpasture.:
Yes.
MI. Goldsmith, There are two pages in document B-1,
is that correct?
Ms• Goodpasture: Right.
MI. Goldsmith. Does one of them contain a conversation
from September 27, 1963 at 1605 hours?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is that accurate?
Ms. Goodpasture.
To the best of my knowledge, it is.
Mr. Goldsmith. An accurate summary of that conversa
tion?
23
24
23
Ms • Goodpasture.
Yes
Mr. Goldsmith, You have indicated that you have seen
this document before.
I am not referring to B-l. I
am going
001233
ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY. INC.
NN 50955 DooId:32277224 Page 93
---
## Page 94
1-92
2
3
20024
300
TTy STREET.
S.V. REFORTERS
NUTI.DING,
UASINOTON.
10
2
13
15
1á
17
18
17
20
73
back to page 4 of document B.
Ms. Goodpasture. Page 4?
Mr. Goldsmith. There is a routingindication that
indicates that you have seen this document before, is that
correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. When was the first time that you saw
this document?
Ms • Goodpasture.
Probably within a day after the
conversation occurred. Well, it would not have been the day
after. This was on the 27th, It would have been picked up
on the following Monday.
Mr. Goldsmith. What action, if any, was taken in
response?
Ms. Goodpasture. These were routed to the Minells.
Mr. Goldsmith. When was the first time that this
conversation was linked to Lee Harvey Oswald?
Ms • Goodpasture. I do not know.
MI. Goldsmith. Let us turn to pages 7 and 8 of document
Ba.
Can you identify this document?
Ms• Goodpasture, Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is that?
Ms.: Goodpasture. It appears to be a copy of a part of
l transcript:
MI. Goldsmith.
Does it reflect a telephone conversation
001234
ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC.
HY 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 94
---
## Page 95
1-93
2
3
5
that came in on September 27, 1963, at 4:26?
Ms. Goodpasture. This is a telephone conversation on
the Soviet Embassy line, different from the different telephone
number and
it is out to the Cuban Embassy from a man inside
the Soviet Embassy making the call to Sylvia Duranda at the
Cuban Embassy •
Mr. Goldsmith. Have you ever seen this document before?
Ms. Goodpasture, I have seen the original, yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. When did you see that for the first
10
time?
13
14
15
30n
STREET,
17
20
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. Probably with a couple of days after
it occurred.
Mr. Goldsmith. When was this document linked to Lee
Harvey Oswald?
Ms. Goodpasture.
I do not know. 'I think after the
assassination,
Mr. Goldsmith. How long were the CIA and Mexico City
station's tapes concerning Oswald's conversations with Cuban
and Soviet officials maintained?
MS. Goodpasture. I think they were probably destroyed
at the same time that other tapes for that period were
destroyed. The translations concerning the part where he
attempted to speak in Russian, the tapes which were taken to
Tarasoff may have been retained a longer time or a shorter
time. I do not know.
001235
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HH 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 95
---
## Page 96
1-94
Mr. Goldsmith. Why would they have been retained a longer
2
3
5
time?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, occasionally he kept voice
samples, but I do not know if he kept one of this call, or
MASICTON, D. C.
20024
(202)
554-2315
not.
300
ITH STREET,
REFORTERS
10
11
• 12
:13
15
15
17
19
20
Mr. Goldsmith. At the time of the assassination, did
the Mexico City station have on hand the tapes of the Oswald
conversations?
Ms. Goodpasture. Not to my knowledge.
Mr. Goldsmith. To your knowledge, was a voice comparison
ever made between the tapes to determine whether the same
person was speaking in each one?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. I did not make one:
I do not know whether someone else made one or not. There is
transcript, a cable here, in which the transcriber of the
Soviet tape says that it is the same voice, which would lead
one to believe that he made a voice comparison, but it just
may have been that he, from his memory, came to that conclu
sion.
23
24
25
Mr. Goldsmith, I would like to refer you now to Stack
C and, in Stack C, if you would kindly refer to page 57,.
please.
Ms, Goodpasture. Page?
MI; Goldsmith, Page 57g
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes,
001236
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC
HM 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 96
---
## Page 97
1-95
2
20024 (202)
554-2345
HASHTROTON:
10
i2
13
14
15
ITH STREET,
17
18
19
20
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith. On the lower righthand corner of the
newspaper article that is contained there, marked off with a
dark line is a paragraph.
Kindly read that paragraph,
starting with the words, "The investigators."
(Pause)
Ms. Goodpasture.
This would suggest -
MI. Goldsmith.
One moment.
Ms. Goodpasture.
- Tarasoff compared the voices on
a tape of October.
Mr. Goldsmith, Whose handwriting appears?
Ms, Goodpasture. That is mine.
Mx. Goldsmith. That is your handwriting?
Ms, Goodpasture. That is mine.
Mr. Goldsmith, That indicates that the caller - could
you please read that to us. Read what you wrote that day.
Ms, Goodpasture. The cäbler from the Cuban Embassy was
unidentified until headquarters sent traces on Oswald. Now,
that would have been in answer to the cable that was dated
8th October. I believe their cable was 18 October, and
voices compared by
was the pseudonym
used by Tarasoff.
Mx. Goldsmith. In fact, that indicates --
Ms. Goodpasture, He compared the Cuban Embassy voices
with the others, with Oswald's call, in which he used his
name.
001237
ALOERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955 DooId:32277224 Page 97
---
## Page 98
1-96
2
3
RETORTERS
NUROTAG, MASHINCTON, D.C. 20024
(202)
551-2345
5
ó
7
10
11
12
13
Mr.: Goldsmith. When would that have happened?
Ms. Goodpasture. I said 18 October because I thought
thät was the date of the cable. 10 October.
Mr. Goldsmith. What happened to that tape containing
Oswald's voice?
Ms. Goodpasture.
What happened?
ME. Goldsmith. What happened to that tape, yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know.
MI. Goldsmith. Do those tapes exist today?
Ms• Goodpasture. What?
Mr.. Goldsmith. Do those tapes exist today?
Ms, Goodpasture.: If they do, I do not know where they
are,
ITH STKEET,
15
17
19
20
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you aware of the fact that, after
the
assassination, it has been alleged that some tapes were
given to the FBI to listen to and that it was said that these
tapes contained Oswald's voice on them?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Someone asked me about that, but I do
not think that I had those tapes, I do not remember if I did,
and I was not aware that we
gave any to the FBI.
I do not
know whether MI. Minell
• got tapes from Mr. Tarasoff and passed
them to the FBI, or if the Chief of Station or Deputy passed
anything to the FBI.
I just do not know.
MI. Goldsmith. At any time, did anyone in the Mexico
atrick tin
001238
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
NW 50955
DocId: 32277224
Page 98
---
## Page 99
1-97
2
3
3
10
12
13
15
18
19
20
2!
23
24
25
City station find any photographs showing Lee Harvey
Oswald?
"Ms. Goodpasture. Notuto my knowledge.
Mr. Goldsmith. How many times did Oswald visit the
Cuban and Soviet embassies and consulates?
Ms • Goodpasture.
We did an analysis of the conversa-
tions which indicated, I think, five times.
MI. Goldsmith. He visited the embassy and consulate
approximately five times?
And even though he visited these
places five times, the station's photosurveillance operations
never took a picture of him, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
MI. Goldsmith. Is there any reason that you can give
as to why the photosurveillance operation, having had five
shots at Mr. Oswald, nevertheless --
Ms, Goodpasture.: I could speculate, but I just assume
that he went there later in the day than they were still
wroking.
Mx. Goldsmith.
In effect, they would have had an
opportunity to get a picture of Mr. Oswald, or the person who
said he was Mr. Oswald, when he went into the embassy and
when he went out of there, so really, there were ten oppor-
tunities to take pictures of Mr. Oswald and yet there was no
picture taken of him,
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
001239
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 99
---
## Page 100
1- 9 8
2
3
554-2345
5
7
8
REPORTEAS
DUTLONG, MASHINGTON, n. C.
10
11
12
•13
30Л
IT STREET,
17
18
19
20
21
2
23
24
25
Mr. Goldsmith. Earlier, you indicated that Winston
Scott was a conscientious administrator, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. After the assassination, was he satis-
fied with the performance of the photo-surveillance operation
in regard to this particular matter?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, we still did not have the
exact times that Oswald went to these places, the inferences
that he used and we could not prove that one of our people
was sitting there, making photographs, and missed him,
Human error if the photograph station was working that
he was missed.
Mr. Golasmith. Without intending to sound argumenta
tive in any way, I would raise the question that needs to be
raised, which is how efficient is the photosurveillance
operation that has ten opportunities to take a picture of
someone and apparently fails in each instance?
Ms, Goodpasture. I think the people that were handling
the photobase at that time sat down and tried to figure out
why it happened. As I recall, they did not think it was
terribly unusual.
I think the Cubans said their machinery was not .
functioning, and I think for the Soviets it was ata time
when they were not working, but I am not sure.
Mr, Goldsmith. Did you, or anyone else, find a picture
001240
ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY. INC.
AW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 100
---
## Page 101
1-99
2
3
5
ó
ITH STREET,
S.W. REPORIERS RUELDIMG,
10
!:
12
13
14
$
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
of someone else who was at the embassies at the time when
Oswald was thought to have
gone there?
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you or anybody else find a picture
of somebody who went to the Cuban or Soviet embassies at a
time whenoswald was thought to have gone there?
Ms. Goodpasture. No.
We found a photograph of a man
but later it was determined that he went there after Oswald
had left.
Ms. Goldsmith, When you found this particular photo-
graph, did you think that it pertained to Oswald?
Ms. Goodpasture. We did not know, because at the time
that photograph was found, as I recall, we did not know
that Oswald had already left there, It was not until after
the assassination that we had the dates of Oswald's
departure from Mexico.
Up until the assassination time and after the assassina-
tion, it still could have been pertinent that this man who
was unidentified could have been Oswald if he had been still
there the 15th.
Mr. Goldsmith. But the agency or the Mexico City sta-
tion never made a connection between this man and Oswald?
Ms , Goodpasture, No.
Mr. Goldsmith. I have just handed you a document that
shows an individual. The background, the document contains a
ALOERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
001241
AW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 101
---
## Page 102
1-100
20024
(202)
5516-2345
ó
3
ITH STREET.
S.W. REPORTERS MUTIDING.
NOSIONGTON,
10
12
13
17
18
19
20
23
24
23
copy of the photograph that was taken of an individual.
The background to the document has been cropped out, is that
correct?
Ms • Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is this the man whose picture was taken
leaving the Cuban or Soviet embassy?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes:
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to refer you to Stack
c, page 2.
We have reviewed this particular document before.
Do you have it before you?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. We reviewed this document earlier today,
have we not?
Ms: Goodpasture. Right.
MI. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to the first
paragraph, it indicates, does it not, on 1 October 63 an
American male speaking broken Russian made contact with the
Soviet embassy. Is that correct?
Ms Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. In the second paragraph, it refersito a
photograph, does it not?
Ms • Goodpasture.:
Yes.
Mr, Goldsmith. Does the second paragraph refer to the
photograph I have just given you?
Ms, Goodpasture. Right.
001242
¿LOERSON REPORTINO COMFANY. INC.
HN 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 102
---
## Page 103
1-101
2
3
REPORTERS BUILDING, MASHTNOTON, D.C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
5
7
STREET,
10 •
!!
12
13
14
15
1á
17
18
20
23
24
25
Mr. Goldsmith. Does it refer to the photograph I have
just given you a copy of?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. It refers to a photograph of
this man. I am not sure that these photographs were made.
Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, nine or ten photographs may
have been taken of this particular man? We do not know that
this was the particular one taken on that day, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Why was the reference made in this
cable to a photograph taken on October I, 1963?
Ms. Goodpasture. It should have been October 2. That
October Ist was the wrong date. I showed you the log yesterday
-to show you how that error occurred.
MI. Goldsmith. At this point, let us look at the 109.
In order to do that, you will have to look
at Stack A. It
is A-4. I believe it is marked Stack A-4. Do you have that
before you? Do you have the log before you?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. Looking at the log, can you now
explain to the Committee why the cable referred to a photo-
graph taken on October Ist when actually it was taken on
another day?
Ms. Goodpasture. If you look at the log here you see
at the top - it was just an oversight on the part of the
person who was writing that cable. It looks as though the
001243
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 103
---
## Page 104
1-102
2
3
5
10
12
13
15
300
17
18
19
20
31
23
24
23
date is 1 October, but if you read it very closely you see
there are only two frames that were shot on 1 October and
2 October, it starts up with frame number 3, et cetera, et
cetera, and there the shots occur. That is the only explana
tion I can give.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is your explanation that whomever
referred to the log simply looked at the date at the top of
the page, the date being October Ist, and did. not see any
reference tolthe date October 2nd?
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Getting back to the cable, what is the
date of the cable?
Ms • Goodpasture. & October.
Mr. Goldsmith. If the photograph was taken on October
2nd, what was the reason for the delay in transmitting this
information to headquarters?
Ms. Goodpasture.. It took about a week for processing,
generally. Two or three days. Someone had to go out and
get it and bring it in.
Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated earlier in your testimony
that the photograph you found was never linked to Oswald, yet
paragraph. 2 of this cable is tied in to paragraph 1 which
specifically refers to an American male who said his name
was Oswald.
Does that not indicate that, in fact, the link was made?
001244
ALDERSON REFORTNG COMPANY. INC.
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 104
---
## Page 105
3
300
ITH STREET
•N. REFORTERS BULLDING, DASHINGTON, D. C.
20029 (202)
554-2345
7
9
10
12
13
1-103
Ms. Goodpasture.
As I said, the link was made earlier.
It did not
relate to Oswald. That was hindsight. At the time
this cable was written, the person who wrote it thought it
could possibly have related to Oswald.
Mr. Goldsmith. I believe that my question earlier was
clear. If you have a problem understanding my questions,
please tell me.
Are there any questions at this time?
Mr. Preyer. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. When did the inaccurate description of
Oswald contained in the first paragraph first come to your
attention?
Ms. Goodpasture.: Page 3?
Mr. Goldsmith. Let us take a look at page 3. Can you
identify the cable that appears on page 3?
Ms. Goodpasture. The description in paragraph 1 of
Oswald is different than the description in paragraph 2.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is the cable that is found on page
17
18
19
20
3?
23
21
23
Ms. Goodpasture.
That is a cable from Washington
headguarters
sent to Mexico in reply to the Mexico cable to
headquarters.
This is giving headquarters tracing on Oswald.
Mr Goldsmithae
When was this cable sent?
Ms • Goodpasture. When was it sent?
001245
ALDERSON REFORTINO COMPANY. INC.
WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 105
---
## Page 106
1-104
MI. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. The day that is on there is 10 October
1963.
3
551-2345
$
REPORTERS BUILDING,
MASHINCION, D.
10
!!
12
13
15
ЗАЛ
ITH STREET,
17
18
19
20
23
25
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it your testimony, then, that based
upon the description of swald in paragraph 1 of that cable
it was realized that the photograph that had been taken on
October 2nd in fact did not show Oswald?
Ms. Goodpasture. It was realized that it was not
Oswald.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to refer to page 5.
Mr. Dodd. Counsel, just one point.
What was your response to that last question?
Mr. Goldsmith. I believe Congressman Dodd has a
question.
MI. Dodd. What was your response to that last question?
Ms. Goodpasture. The last question, that the identifi-
cation of Oswald that they had a file trace on in the Washing-
ton cable was different from the one that the description of
the man who was in the photograph.
Mr. Dodd. You reached that conclusion on what day;
with the 10 October '63 cable, what day would you have
received that on that day, 10 October?
Ms. Goodpasture. We would have received it on about
the 10th or Ilth of October, within a day from the time it
was sent here. And I said we reached that conclusion. There
001246
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 106
ANDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 107
1-105
3
REPORTERS
NUILDING
MASHINGTON, D.C.
20024 (202) 554-2345
S
8
10
12
13
15
17
ITH STREET,
19
20
?!
23
24
23
was controversy there over whether this man could have been
Oswald.
Mr. Dodd. Counsel, why do you not proceed?
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you describe the controversy that
you are referring to, Miss Goodpasture, over whether this
man was Oswald?.
Ms. Goodpasture. I felt that it was not Oswald.
MI. Goldsmith. When did you feel this? At the time
that the cable was sent?
Ms. Goodpasture. As soon as we got the description,
because I did not think this man, this photograph, could
possibly be the same man that was described here.
Mr. Goldsmith. What actions were taken at that point
to clarify the situation?
Ms. Goodpasture. I had an argument, I think, with the
Deputy Chief of Station, MI. Scott, over it. He said, oh,
that may be incorrect and so forth. But there was quibbling
over it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Going back to the cable that appears
on page 2, I am still not sure that I understand why the
photo was sent to headquarters. What indication did you
have that Oswald had been to the Cuban or Russian Embassy on
October Ist of 2nd of 1963?
The transcripts that we reviewed earlier gave no indica-
tion that he was going to be there on that day.
0012477
H₩ 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 107
ALDERSON REPORTING COMFANY, INC
---
## Page 108
1-106
2
3
(202)
554-2345
S
Ms. Goodpasture. What was that again now?
Mr. Goldsmith. The transcript that we reviewed earlier
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
MI. Goldsmith. Gave no indication that Oswald was
going to be at the Russian or Cuban Embassy on October Ist
or 2nd.
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. But once this mistake
was made and this cable was sent, it was compounded, because
the cable was used as reference material, rather than
1 going
back to the log.
We did not get around to correcting that
date.
300
1TH
STREET,
S.l1.
REPORTERS BUILDING.
10
1!
12
13
14
15
17
20
21
2]
24
25
MI. Goldsmith. I understand that but, however, at the
time this cable was sent, it refers to an American male
entering the Soviet Embassy. on October ist and now we find
that it really was October 2nd., And apparently you checked
the production logs for October Ist and 2nd.
My question is; since the transcripts
gave no indication
that Oswald had been at the Embassy on October Ist or 2nd
why was this picture connected to Oswald?. You have no inde-
pendent information that Oswald had been to the Embassy on
October lst or 2nd?
Ms: Goodpasture. That is true, but we could not tell
from this conversation on the lst that he did not go there?
We also could not tell from our transcripts that he had left
the area and that there was a possibility that he had gone
001248
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 108
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 109
1-107
2
3
5
ó
7
3
10
J00. OTH STREET,
S:U. REPORTERS BUILDING,
12
13
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
23
there without calling.
MI. Goldsmith. You checked the photosurveillance
materials for approximately a four or five day period, is that
correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, I think it is.
Mr. Goldsmith. During that four of five day period
Oswald was the only -- not Oswald. This man was the only
non-Latin appearing man whose photograph you found, is that
correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think that it was the only non-
Latin appearing person's photograph that we found that we
could not identify as somebody else. A lot of the people
who went to the Soviet Embassy all the time, we
came to know
who they were. After they had been identified, they made
frequent visits there.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to refer your attention
now to page 5.
Mr. Preyer. Counsel, may I speak to you for a moment?
(Discussion off the record.)
Mr. Dodd. Miss Goodpasture, I
am checking on the time
remaining for questioning. Counsel indicates that he would
require something less than another hour. Is that right?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. Can you stand it
• that much bonger?
Let us get it over with.
001249
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 109
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC
---
## Page 110
1-108
MI. Preyer. Would you prefer ahead and get it over
: 2
with?
20024
(202)
554-2345
5
7
3
REPORTERS BUILDING.
HASHINCTON.
10
12
3
300 7T1
STREET,
15
15
17
18
19.
20
23
24
Ms. Goodpasture.
I would rather
get it over with, if
you can stand it.
Mx. Preyer. All right.
I think
we might proceed at this time.
• I will have to
excuse myself.
MI. Goldsmith., For purposes of clarification, the
reason that this particular photograph was selected was
because during the four or five day period in which the
photo productioniots were checked, this individual was the
only non-latin appearing male whom your personnel in the
Mexico City station were unable to identify, is' that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to page 5 --
before we get into page 5, was Oswald's, or the person whom
you thought was Oswald, was his appearance at the Embassy
considered to be unusual or of any significant interest?
Ms. Goodpasture, Would you ask that question again?
I am not sure I understood.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was. thecfact that Oswald or the person
whom you identified as Oswald appeared at the embassies when
he did, was that considered unusual?
Ms. Goodpasture. No. Frequently there were callers,
people who were American citizens, long distance calls, local
001250
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 110
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 111
1-109
2
3
300 PTH STREET,
S. 11.
REFORTIRS
PURIDING,
FISHINGTON.
D. C..
20024
(202)
5546-2345
ó
7
3
calls, and so many of them were crackpots, in a sense, that
it was just another one, another name that we might or might
not identify. But when we found that there was no record in
our file traces it did not mean anything to us exceptaa name
at that time.
Mr. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention now to page 5
of the cable that was sent to the Mexico City station from the
CIA headquarters, this is page 5 of stack C --
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the releasing officer for this
10
11
12
13
cable?
17
13
19
20
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. Who wrote it?
MI. Goldsmith. Who was the releasing officer?
Ms. Goodpasture. The releasing officer?
Mr. Goldsmith.
Xes.
Ms. Goodpasture. The Acting Director for Plans.
His
name was Tom Karamessinas.
Mr. Goldsmith. At that time, MI. Karamesinas was the
Director for Plans?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
I think Assistant Director,
excuse me.
Mr. Goldsmith. Under what circumstances would somebody
like Karamessinas serve as a releasing officer?
Ms• Goodpasture. I do not know.
It may have been the
hour of the day that it was sent.
He may have been the only
001251
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 111
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC..
---
## Page 112
1-110
2
3
s.M.
REPORTERS BUILDING,
vasHHOTOw, o.c.
20024
(202)
554-2345
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
300
17
18
19
20
21
23
26
25
person still around at that time.
Mr. Goldsmith.
MIs: Karamessinas?
Ms • Goodpasture.
I was in Mexico so I would not really
know why he did it at headquarters.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand.
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. Mr. Karamessinas' position was a
relatively high one in the CIA hierarchy, is that correct?
Ms • Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. This was a matter that was not considered
to be of particular significance, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. It was not significant to us at the
time that - before we
got the name trace. It may have been
considered significant here in Washington because it was
possibly because he was a former defector.
Mr. Goldsmith. I see. The Washington authorities may
have regarded this as significant and upon receipt of this
cable in Mexico City station, I believe you indicated before
that MI. Tarasoff apparently made a voice comparison of the
taped conversations. Is that correct?
Ms • Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. If headquarters considered this matter
to be significant, would they have been apprised of the
results of this voice comparison?
Ms. Goodpasture, I do not know whether they would of
001252
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 112
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 113
1-111
not:
2
3
20024 (202)
554-2345
S
8
MACINGTON,
10
!!
13
REPONTERS
JOn TTU STREET,
15
1á
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
23
M8. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine procedure?
Ms. Goodpasture.
The voice comparison only indicated
that he called the Soviet embassy and the Cuban embassy.
We
had his name, a name, Oswald, in the traffic to the Soviet
embassy,
to start off with, and the only thing the voice
comparison did, it tied in that name, but we had no way of
identifying our caller exactly with the subject of this
trace.
MI. Goldsmith. Are you saying, then, that the fact
that Oswald, the fact that you were able to, by voice compari-
son, establish that he had been to the Cuban Embassy and the
Soviet Embassy was not significant?
Ms. Goodpasture, That is what we said in the note.
In the transcripts, he called the Soviet embassy from the
Cuban embassy, a man, and that voice by the Russian trans-
criber was identified as the same voice as the person who
said his name was Lee Oswald.
MI. Goldsmith. I understand that. But headquarters
was never apprised of that voice comparison?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think they were in a cable.
Mr. Goldsmith. Prior to the assassination? •
Ms. Goodpasture. No, I do not think they were prior
to the assassination.
MI: Goldsmith. Apparently the fact that the Lee Harvey
001253
NN 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 113
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 114
1-112
5
2002% (202)
REPORTERS
PUTIDING,
MASMINGTON,
10
12
13
•15
ITH STREET,
18
20
21
22
23
24
23
Oswald was considered significantly significant. for Mr.
Karamessinas to be the releasing officer of the cable to the
Mexican station and a voice
comparison is made for the purpose
of determining essentially whether Oswald had been to both
the Cuban and the Soviet Embassy. According to your testi
mony, the results of that voice comparison were that in fact
it was the same person.
Are you saying that the fact that Oswald had been to
both the Cuban and the Russian embassy was not considered
sufficiently important to notify headquarters prior to the
assassination?
Ms. Goodpasture. No, because at that stage, we had no
way of proving that the man who made that call in Mexico was
the same man that this trace was about.
Mr. Goldsmith. The cable from headquarters gives back-
ground information on Mr. Oswald, does it not?
Ms• Goodpasture. Right..
We assumed that it probably was.
MI. Goldsmith. Right.
After receiving the cable, a voice comparison is made.
It is determined that the same person was talking on each
tape and there is no follow-up to headquarters, even though
headguarters clearly considered this to be significant?
Ms. Goodpasture. The follow-up was made by disseminat-
ing this information from the traces locatly and trying
001254
NW 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 114
ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANT. INC
---
## Page 115
1-113
554-2395
(202)
2002%
WASHINCTON,
REPORTERS BULLDING.
S.U.
3O0 ITH STREET,
2
3
ó
7
3
10
11
12
13
15
18
19
20
21
23
24
23
identify Oswald, trying to locate the man. That is the way
the follow up was made. We thought that he may still be in
Mexico.
Mr. Goldsmith. The point is, however, that upon the
making of a voice comparison, if, in fact, that was done,
that information was not communicated to anyone.
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know if it was or not.
You would have to check the file completely, the cable
traffic, to see if it was. Io the best of my knowledge, it
was not until after the assassination.
MI. Goldsmith. If it were not, would that be unusual?
MS. Goodpasture. NO.
MX: Goldsmith. Despite the fact that this was considered
something of significance by headquarters?
Ms. Goodpasture. Headquarters - no, because they
could not have done anything with the voice comparison.
Mx. Goldsmith. Perhaps they could not have done any
thing with the voice comparison, but they may have considered
it to be even more serious had they been informed that not
only had Oswald been to the Soviet Embassy but he also had
been to the Cuban Embassy-
Ms. Goodpasture. I think they knew that, because the
call from the Soviet Embassy came from the Cuban Embassy.
MI. Goldsmith. Your cable of October 3th, does that.
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 115
indicate that the call came fron the Cuban Embassy?
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
001255
---
## Page 116
1-114
2
3
5
JON ITH STREET
S.H. REPONTERS BUTLDINO, MASHINGTON, D.C. 20024
( 202)
554-2345
7
$
10
!!
12
13
15
1á
iT.
20
21
23
24
23
MI. Goldsmith.::
Your cable of October 8th, I am
referring now to page 2. Does that give any indication that
the call came from the Cuban Embassy?
Ms. Goodpasture. The first call was not made - no,
it does not.
Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, headquarters did not know
that he had been to the Cuban Embassy,
MS, Goodpasture. Pardon me?
MI. Goldsmith. In fact, headquarters did not know that
he had also been to the Cuban Embassy:
Ms. Goodpasture. At that point, no.
MI. Goldsmith. At least, according to your recollec-
tion, it was not until after the assassination that head-
quarters was informed of that fact.
Ms. Goodpasture. That is probably right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Have you ever spoken to Mr. Karasmes-
sinas about this matter?
Ms • Goodpasture. Pardon me?
Mr. Goldsmith. Have you ever spoken to Mr. Karamessinas
about this matter?
Ms. Goodpasture. No, and I do not think that in
Mexico that we would have known that Tom Karamessinas signed
off on this cable, beause the cable that came down there did
not have the names of the people on them.
This is a headquarters file copy that you are working
001256
WH 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 116
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 117
1-115
with here and it is next to a copy from the Mexico station
file.
3
REPORTERS
BUILDING,
WASHINGTON, D. C.
20024
(202)
554-2345
7
$
10
!1.
12
3
15
7TH STREET
17.
13
19
20
27
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith. There are other indications on the
cable as well that headquarters regarded this incident to be
significant, is that not true? The cable also contains other
indications that indicated that headquarters regarded this
matter to be significant, is that not true?
For example, in paragraph 4 -- I am referring now to
page 5 of Stack C, paragraph 4 -- it says, "Station should
pass info RIF (1) and it
gives cryptonyms of various govern-
mental agencies. Certainly that is an indication that
headquarters regarded this as significant.
Ms. Goodpasture. That Information was taken immediately
and all efforts were made to locate the man in Mexico, think-
ing that he was still there, but this cable. did not tell us
that he had come back to the states.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand. The only point I am
making here, this is a spearate indication that headquarters
regarded this to be a matter of significance, the fact that
they told you to pass along information to other people.
Ms • Goodpasture. That is right.
MI. Dodd. Counsel?
(Discussion off the record.)
Mr. Dodd: We are
going to take a five or so minute
recess:
There is a recorded vote on the Floor. I will
give
001257
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 117
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC:
---
## Page 118
1-116
3
3O0 PTH STREET.
S.V. REPORTERS BUSIDING.
NASHNGTON, D.С. 20024 (202)
551-2345
10
12
13
14
15.
you aminute to
get a breather and I will be right. back to
continue with the questioning.
The Committee will stand in recess for five minutes.
(A brief recess was taken.)
MI. Dodd. At the time that we took the recess, and I
responded to a recorded vote, Counsel was proceeding with
questions. I would ask counsel to continue with those
questions.
Mr. Goldsmith. Thank you.
One question that was out of the line of my inquiry
that I was making prior to the recess, at the time that
the Oswald reco-ding was obtained, did you or anyone else
go to Boris Tarasoff and indicate to him that this was a matter
of special importance and needed to be transcribed immedi-
ately?
17
18
19
20
21
Ms. Goodpasture. The first tape with his voice on it,
I cannot remember whether or not I took that to Herb Minell
or whether the outside agent took it to Tarasoff, but it was
taken to Tarasoff at the same time that it came in from the
base:
24
Mr. Goldsmith. Was Tarasoff
given special instructions
that this particular recording was of unusual importance?
Ms: Goodpasture. I am quite sure that he was asked
to transcribe it imnediately®:
Mr. Goldsmith. Why would he have been asked to transcribe
001258
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Paye 118
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 119
1-117
3
20024
300 PUH STREET
S.H.
REFORTERS BUTLDING, BASHTHCTON,
10
12
13
13
1ớ
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
it immediately?
Ms. Goodpasture.. So they could find out whether there
was any information there under the name Lee Oswald. That
was the only transcription that he did except for a short
one from the Cuban Embassy staff.
Mr. Goldsmith. The first conversation that came in
involving Oswald apparently came in on September 27, that
he was not identified by name in that conversation.
Ms. Goodpasture. No, that is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was that tape taken to Tarasoff?
Is
that the one that he was asked to transcribe immediately?
Ms. Goodpasture. The one that he was asked to transcribe
immediately was the one that had the name on it.. The one
that was unidentified, it would also have been taken to him
as soon as it came off of the machine, and he would have been
asked to transcribe it as soon as he could.
MI. Goldsmith, I am not sure I follow you why there
was a need to transcribe it immediately.
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
MI. Goldsmith, Why was there a need to have him
transcribe it immediately?
Ms. Goodpasture.
The Lee Oswald one?
Mr. Goldsmith Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. The conversation was in Russian, or
broken Russian, but it was in a language that the monitors
001259
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 119
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 120
1-I18
3
S
ó
10
12
.13
15
300
17
18
19
20
?1
23
23
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 120
inside could not understand. They could not tell if the
man had a telephone number there or if he had an address
or if he gave more information in the Russian language than
his name
The only thing they got was his name, which I believe
was in English.
Mr. Goldsmith. Even so, why could they not have waited
for the ordinary lag time to ensure prior to the transcrip
tion of the recording?
Ms. Goodpasture. Wait a minute. We are talking about
two different things. The reason that he would have been
asked, Tarasoff would have been asked, to transcribe it
immediately would have been because we had a name connected
with it. Most of Tarasoff's transcription work was trans-
cribing Russian to English, but the conversations were with
persons who were in the Embassy, Soviet personnel, and in
that process he built up a backlog.
So if something came in that was not a Soviet or
something other than the people who we knew there talking,
he would have been asked to do that immediately before the
chit-chat conversation translations of people who were
living in the Embassy:
Now do you understand what I am talking about?
MI. Goldsmith, I think your explanation is responsive.
MI. Dodd,
"Counsel, one point I should make gothe 6ú
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 121
1-119
2
3
20024 (202)
554-2315
7
MACHENGTON,
10
!1
12
13
14
REPORTERS
30n
PTH STREET
17
18
19
20
21
record. I should mention that Mr. Edgar is replacing MI.
Sawyer here for purpose of this hearing.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like, at this point, to refer
to page 6 of the documents contained in Stack C. In this
regard, can you identify this particular document?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, it is a cover sheet that woüld
go over a cable in the Mexico station files.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is this the cover sheet that went with
the cable that was received from headquarters which gave the
correct description of Oswald?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Probably on the llth of October.
That is the date stamped here.
Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, number
meter tot
"ISMs, Goodpasture. No, that is not right. The date
is stamped there with the date of the message. The day it
was received was 12 October which was the day that is
beside Scott's name.
MI. Goldsmith. However, the routing slip pertains
to cable number 74830.
Ms. Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Which is the one that arrived from
Washington that gave the description of Oswald, is that
correct?
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. That is correct.
MI. Goldsmith. Examining this particular document,
001261
NN 50955 DocId:32207224 Page 121
ALGERSON REPORTINE COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 122
1-120
2
3
REPORTERS
BULLDING,
HASINGTON, D. C.
20024 (202)
5
ó
7
3
10
12
14
15
ЗO0 ITH STREET,
17
18
•19
20
21
23
24
25
whose handwriting appears in dark, bold script on the right
side, the right side of the page?
Ms. Goodpasture.
The dark print?
Mr. Goldsmith. The cursive.
Ms. Goodpasture. Please set up P file?
MI. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture, That is Mr. Scott's.
MI. Goldsmith. What is a P file?
Ms. Goodpasture. Where?
MI. Goldsmith.: What is a P file?
Ms. Goodpasture. What is one?
Mr. Goldsmith, Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. That is
a personality file on an
individual, an investigative file containing all the informa-
tion about a name.
MI. Goldsmith. Is that a file that is maintained at a
local station?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mx. Goldsmith. How does it differ from the file on an
individual that is maintained at
• headquarters?
Ms. Goodpasture. It is not any different at all. It
is the same type of file.
Mr, Goldsmith. In terms of the content of the file,
would everytng that is in the local file, the P file, be
reflected in the headquarters file on the individual?
011262
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 122
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 123
1-121
2
3
ó
7
REPORTERS MUTIDING, MASHINCTON,
=
10
'1
12
13
14
15
STR
17
18
19
20
13
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. Not always. It should be, but some-
times formal communication was sent to headquarters that was
written from several notes. The formal communication, such
as the cable, would be in the headquarters files, but if some-
one had taken the information down from the conversation on a
table napkin, or something, and had not written a formal
memorandum for the file, the raw data would not be in the
headquarters file.
MI. Goldsmith. How long would it take to open a P
'file
locally?
Ms, Goodpasture. Depending on the workload, it should
not take longer than a day to take a file folder out of the
cabinet and put the material in and put a label on it. •
MI, Goldsmith. Is it likely that Oswald's P file
was open shortly after October 12, 1963?
Ms, Goodpasture. I would assume so.
MI. Goldsmith. Examining the statement in cursive
by Mr. Scott, it says, "Please set up P file on Lee Henry
Oswald and put all data that we have into it."" "All" is
underscored.
Do you have any explanation for why Mr. Scott would
have bothered to underscore "all"?
Ms. Goodpasture. He always did that.
You always had the feeling that your files were never
complete enough.
001263
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 123
ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 124
1-122
2
3
20024.
(202)
554-2345
300
7T1 STREET
5.H.
REPORTERS MUTIDING,
NASHTNCTON,
10
12
13
14
15
17
17
20
21
23
24
23
Mr. Goldsmith. If you examined another routing slip
by Mr. Scott directing that a P file should be opened, he
would also, as a matter of routine, have the "all" under-
lined?
Ms, Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. To your knowledge, do you have any
information that any materials that should have gone in
Oswald's P file were not put into it?
Ms, Goodpasture. Not to my knowledge.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was Oswald's P file, in fact, complete?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think his file was complete.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to refer you to page 7
at this time of the materials contained in Stack C'and could
you explain to me and the Congressmen what the difference
is between this cable which is marked, in the upper right-
hand corner, 74830 and the cable that appears on page 3 that
is also marked 74830?
Ms: Goodpasture: Number 3?
Mr. Goldsmith. Page 3.
Ms . Goodpasture.
The one on page 7 is a copy of the
cable when it was received in Mexico City that was typed up
in the Mexico station, The one on page 3 is a copy that
was taken from the headquarters file and the way the cable
looked when it went out.
Page 7 is the way it was received,. You have information
001264
HH 50955
DocId: 32277224
Page 124
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 125
1-123
3
5
JON ITH STREET,
S.W.
REPORTERS BULLDING, MASHINCTON, B.
10
12
13
14
15
15
17
3
from the Mexico file and information from a headquarters file
put together here.
Mr. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine, who would review
the cable upon receiving it in Mexico City?
Ms. Goodpasture. The first person to get all cable
traffic was the Chief of Station and the second person to get
it was Alan White. The third person to get it was usually
the person to whom it was routed to, that Mr. Scott wanted
to see it first.
Mr. Goldsmith. On page 7. This appears to be Mr.
Scott's handwriting in dark, the dark lines, and the hand-
writing.
Ms, Goodpasture. Winn Scott!s.
Mr. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to the arrow
that appears on the upper lefthand corner of this document,
the arrow goes from Henry upwards. Do you see that?
Ms• Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. To the right of that appears the word
"sic."
20
23
24
25
Ms • Goodpasture. Right.
MI.. Goldsmith. Underscored.
Can you explain that?
Ms, Goodpasture.
Well, he put "sic" there because he
wanted a heading on the P file -- this goes back to the P
file -- he wanted the P file to be written Lee Oswald, the
001265
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 125
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC
---
## Page 126
1-124
2
3
5
3
REPORTERS
QUILDING
10
11
12
13
14:
15
15
300
PTU STREET,
18
20
23
24
title on it, also known as lee Henry Oswald. That is what
the "sic" designates, that it could be two names.
MI. Goldsmith. If that were the case, would not the
appropriate way to indicate that be by writing down "aka".
instead of "sic"
Ms. Goodpasture. "Aka" was also used.
Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, my impression is that the
term "sicl: is used as a matter of routine in the English
language to designate that the item that is referred to is
erronEOUS •
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think he meant it in those
terms. I think he wanted both names to be on the file. He
is another world now and there is no way of finding out.
MI. Goldsmith. Understood.
In fact, the "sic" points right to the henry and in
fact Oswald's real name was Harvey not Herry, is that correct?
Ms • Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith.: Did Winn Scott know that Oswald's middle
name was Harvey and not Henry?
Ms Goodpasture. Not to my knowledge. We had no record
of it at the Mexico station. We had no trace on anyone by
Oswald.
MI. Goldsmith, That is exactly right. It is an impor-
tant question
Ms, Goodpasture. Right
001266
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 126
ALOSASON REPORTING COMPANY, INC:
---
## Page 127
1-125
3
5
ó
• 20024
(202)
30n
ITH
STREET
S.H. REPORTERS
КU11DTIR
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
21
That is why, I think, that he must have wanted it so
that the file would show lee Oswald and also Lee Henry
Oswald.
Mr. Goldsmith. If the Committee wanted to verify whether
it was standard procedure for Mr. Scott to indicate that a file
should be opened under more than one name, for him to indi-
cate that by writing down the word "sic," I presume that all
we would have to do is to review cable traffic or routing
sheets to see if that was a matter of routine, he used that
terminology, "sic" is that not correct?
Ms • Goodpasture.
You could if you wanted.
MI. Goldsmith. If, in fact, it turned out that as a
matter of routine he did not use the terminology "sic" to
refer to the opening of a file under more than one name, that
might indicate, would it not, that scott was aware of Oswald's
true middle name?
Ms. Goodpasture. I would not
go so far as to suggest
that. You could assume that you thought that he knew, but
if he knew it, we certainly had no record of it to my knowledge
at the Mexico station.
MI. Dodd. Let me step in here for a second.
Ms. Goodpasture.
I do not think he knew
It.
MI. Dodd. Let me ask you something, ma'am.
What does
"sic" mean to you, s-i-c?
Ms. Goodpasture. I was just saying that; the way it is
00126%
NN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 127
ALDERSON REPORTING COMFANY, INC.
---
## Page 128
1-126
2
3
551-2345
written
Mr, Dodd, What does "sic" mean to you?
Ms • Goodpasture.
A garbled version of a name.
MI. Dodd. Not an aka?
Ms. Goodpasture. No.
MI. Dodd. There is a distinction between an aka and a
sic?
3
9
10
12
13
14
15
30n
ITH STREET,
S.V. REPORTEES
17
18
19
20
21
23
2%
25
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Dodd. Are you telling this conmittee that it is
your personal knowledge --
Ms. Goodpasture. I am saying, sir, that I think that.
what he meant was that lee Oswald, because the first conversa-
tion we heard --
MI. Dodd. I understand,. Let me repeat what I think
you are saying. Correct me if I am wrong.
What you are telling us is that you have personal
knowledge that the individual that made that notation there,
sic, as a result of your personal knowledge of this individual,
he used those words interchangeably all the time, even though
you know that those two words have different meanings, or
those symbols have different meanings?
Ms, Goodpasture. That is not what I mean to say.
MI. Dodd. The record indicates that you had some sort
of special knowledge that this individual used those symbols
interchangeably.
001268
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 128
ALDERSON REFORTHO COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 129
1-127
2
3
300
721.ST4FET
=
RETORTISS
BUILDING,
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024
(202)
551-2345
10
13
5
1ó
3
20
23
21
25
Ms. Goodpasture. In the context of the way the name
Lee Oswald came to our attention the first time, it was in
such a way that we could not tell the man was saying his
name was Lee and Oswald, or whether his name was Lee Oswald.
Mr. Dodd, What notation was made in that reference
in the cable traffic when the transcripts - what notation is
in parentheses?
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
Mr. Dodd. What notation was in parentheses in the
transcripts of the telephone conversations? Does the word
phonetic, does that strike a bell
in parentheses, phonetic?
Ms. Goodpasture. Phonetic, Lee Oswald.
When the transcript was first brought to me, the man
outside, as I recall, said they do not know if this man is
Lee or whether it is Oswald.
Mx. Dodd. If they indicated they did not understand,
what did they put in parentheses?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Before the action was taken on the
transcript, was taken to the transcriber who prepared an
English translation and on the basis of his English trans-
lation they felti that, the person who prepared the cable
felt, that the name was Lee Oswald.
Mr. Dodd. Did they not put phonetic?
Ms: Goodpasture. They put phonetic.
Mr. Dodd. They did not put sic?
001269
HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 129
ALOERSON REFORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 130
1-128
2
3
20024
(202)
REPORTERS
BUILDING,
VASHINGTON,
10
11
12
13
15
17
JON TIN STREET,
20
27
23
24
23
Ms. Goodpasture. Meaning that they did not know whether
it was spelled ozwald or Oswald, I guess. But I cannot be
sure, but the person who prepared the cable is here, Barbara
Minell. She might know.
MI. Dodd. Counsel and witness, I am going to have to
apologize to you one more time. This is one of the burdens
of this institution. We have a recorded vote again. We will
come right back.
(A brief recess was taken.)
MI. Dodd. Picking up where we left off at the time we
took that recess, I do not want to belabor this point with
you.
How well did you know Mr. Scott?
Ms. Goodpasture. I did not make myself clear. What
I meant when I answered his question, I thought, I think,
that this refers to the fact that the fist lee Oswald that
we had was garbled.
Mr. Goldsmith. Where was that? What are you talking
about, on the transcripts or the conversation?
Ms, Goodpasture. From the transcripts, yes, sir.
And we had never seen the name printed and that I thought what
he meant that this lee Henry Oswald file should have in it
all the information that we had on the man with the name,
the garbled name, the Lee Oswald that had come up in the
transcripts:
That was just my interpretation.
I do not know, to
091270
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 130
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 131
1-129
2
5
VASIONICTON,
n. C.
20024
10
12
13
REPORTERS
300
PTH STREET
17
18
19
20
27
23
24
23
answer the question truthfully.
MI, Dodd.:.
Let us go back a little bit and, counsel,
I will ask you to assist me on this, but in all of the trans-
cripts, was there any middle name or middle initial mentioned?
I do not recall seeing any.
Mr. Goldsmith. No, there was not.
MI. Dodd. That does not explain the letter or the
language "sic" by Henry, because they had never been any
reference to a Henry or a Harvey®
Ms. Goodpasture. That Henry, I think that was the
headquarters mistake. This cable originated in headquarters
that we are looking at and this is a copy of it as it was
received in Mexico.
The first time that we received the name on Oswald and
the traces it was Lee Henry, and it was later that it became
Lee Harvey
Mr. Dodd. We are getting away from my point. If it
were a question about using a different name as you have
properly described Aka, also known as, is the proper letter
to use in that kind of situation where a sic, as you have
properly defined it, describes an entirely different
situation.
Ms • Goodpasture. Right.
MI. Dodd. My next question is, how well did you know
MI. Scott? Didyou know him well?
001271
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 131
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 132
1-130
2
WASHINCTON,
n.C.
20024 (202)
554-2345
3
10
13
7T1
STREET
13
17
13
19
20
21
23
24
MS • Goodpasture.:
I worked there for 11 years when he
was there.
Mt. Dodd. You knew him fairly well.
Ms.Goodpasture. Let me answer it this way. I do not
think I knew him well enough to be able to say beyond any
reasonable doubt what he meant here by this term
MI. Dodd. Were you familiar with his annotations on
other cable traffic?
Ms. Goodpasture. Well, yes, I think I probably was
more familiar than anybody else who was down there at that
time because I was down there longer.
Mr. Dodd. Did you ever notice that he used these
symbols interchangeably in other cable traffic?
Ms • Goodpasture.
res, I think he would use it.. I have
seen him write sic in for a
garbled name by the side of it.
One garbled version put
in for the information on a file
traced with another name.
MI. Dodd. Thank you, I turn questioning over to
counsel.
Mr • Göldsmith®
Referring to page 6.0f Stack C, Scott
indicates that a P file should be opened on lee Henry Oswald
does he not?
Ms, Goodpasture.
Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith, He does not indicate that a file should
be opened under Lee Oswald and Lee Henry Oswald, does he?
001272
HW
50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 132
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC
---
## Page 133
1-131
2
3
10
12
13
14
300
7711
STREET
S.W.
REPORTERS
16
17
13
19
20
In other words; he does not indicate the file should
be opened up under two names?
Ms. Goodpasture.'Right.
MI. Goldsmith. So really there is no basis at all for
thinking that the term "sic" indicates what Scott had in mind
was an "aka" is there? " There is no basis for reaching that
conclusion, is there?
Ms. Goodpasture. Would you repeat that again?
Mr, Goldsmith.
certainly
It is apparent from the routing indication on page 6
that Scott wanted the file opened on Lee Henry Oswald.
Ms • Goodpasture. Right.
Mr. Goldsmith. He gave no indication on the routing
slip that he wanted the file open up under the name Lee Henry
Oswald aka Lee Oswald. There is no indication that the file
was to be opened up under two names. In light of that, there
is really no basis, is there, for concluding that the use of
the phrase sic on page 7 refers to the term aka?
Ms. Goodpasture.
My interpretation that the use of
the word sic was for the lee Oswald, the first name in there
on page and that all of the information about that name
that we did not know the full name on would
go into the other
file,
23
14
23
Mr. Goldsmith, The "sic" is pointing to the word
"Henry" is it not?
001273
HW 50955
DooId: 32277224 Page 133
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 134
1-132
2
3
RETORTERS
BULLDING, WASHINGTON,
D.C.
2002%
(202)
554-2345
5
ó
3
10
!1
12
13
15
17
18
19
20
23
23
Ms • Goodpasture. I feel that refers to the first
Lee Oswald in place of Lee Henry Oswald, the first line.
We
could argue that.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is not the arrow pointed right over
and in between the "e" and "n'"in the word "Henry"?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right, but it is also pointing
right to the beginning of the lee Oswald name.
To answer your question, I do not know.
MI. Goldsmith. In any event, "sic" does not mean "aka"
does it?
Ms • Goodpasture:
That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Scott did not use those terms
interchangeably, did he?
Ms. Goodpasture., Did he
Mr. Goldsmith. Use the term "sic"
pas-i-c, and the
term "aka".
interchangeably? He did not, as a matter of
custom, do that, did he?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not recall having seen him use
aka that much at all. I have seen sic several times after a
name when there was no middle initial or where there was.
question about spelling.
Mr. Goldsmith. I do not believe that the answer was
responsive. Do you know whether he used the term "sic" and
"aka" interchangeably?
MS, Goodpasture. No, I do not know.
001274
AH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 134
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 135
1-133
2
3
vENINGTON, D.С. 20024
(202)
554-2345
10
12
Mr. Goldsmith. You testified earlier, I belleve, that
upon receipt of this cable, the Tarasoffs, or Boris Tarasoff,
made a voice comparison. Is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That -
Mr. Goldsmith. Your testimony earlier, I believe, was
that upon receipt of this cable from headquarters, Boris
Tarasoff made a voice comparison of the tape recordings?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. And they concluded --
Ms. Goodpasture. At some time after receipt of this
cable, according to receipt of that note, I do not know
when.
300
ITH STREET,
S.W.
REFORTERS
15
15
17
18
19
20
Mr. Goldsmith. He concluded that it was the same
person on both tapes, is that correct?
Ms, Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like you to refer now to page
21 in Stack C, page 21.
Ms. Goodpasture. One moment,
MI. Goldsmith. We will make that page 22. Can you
identify this document?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes, This is a copy of a cable that
was sent from headquarters to Washington.:
Mr. Coldsmith.
Who was the originating officer of this
23
24
25
cable?
Ms . Goodpasture.
I am.
001275
AW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 135
ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY INC.
---
## Page 136
1-134
MI. Goldsmith. Who was the authenticating officer of
2
JON ITH STREET.
5.11.
REPONTERS
BUILDING,
CASINGTON, D.C. 2002º
(202)
554-2345
7
3
10
12
13
14
$
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 136
this cable?
Ms. Goodpasture.
I am.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is your understanding of the term
"authenticating officer"? What does that term mean?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Someone who has the authority to sign
a cable, to release it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would an authenticating officer simply
sign a cable and release it, or is there anything that he
would do before signing?
Ms. Goodpasture. The releasing officer was a superior
officer.
MI, Goldsmith. It would be the responsibility of the
authenticating officer, would it not, to verify the accuracy
of the contents of the cable?
Is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, that would be his responsibility.
MI. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to the bottom of
page 22, please read the second paragraph.
It continues on
to page 23.
(Pause)
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Specifically, this seers to indicate
that the station is unable to compare the voice of the first
tape, which was erased pror to the receipt of the second call?
Is that true? Is that what the document indicates? 001276
ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 137
1-135
2
3
3
300
7T1
STREET,
s.l1.
REPORTERS
BULLDING.
VASIENGTON,
D. C.
10
12
13
15
17
18
20
23
24
23
Ms • Goodpasture. Right.
MI. Goldsmith. Do you have any explanation for the
inconsistency between this document and your earlier testimony
that there was a voice comparison made?
Ms, Goodpasture. The only explanation that I can make
is that the Soviet transcriber made it on the basis of not
listening to the two tapes again over, but on his memory of
yes, that is the same man that I listened to and transcribed
the tape fron the Soviet Embassy, the man who called himself
Lee Oswald.
MI. Dodd, Counsel, I do not want to interrupt you.
Mrs. Goodpasture, you worked a long time in that Embassy,
you are very familiar with technical terms and terminology
that are used.
Now, when you are doing a voice comparison and what
all of that means, a voice comparison, that is a rather
technical description of something, and you just stated a
minute ago that a voice comparison was made. I would assume
by that that you are telling this Committee - and we are
grateful that you are here, we appreciate your testimony.
We have a very difficult job in front of us. We are trying
to get to the botton of this whole story, and you are making
it difficult.
I do not like to have to tell you that, but you are. You
are using the term "voice comparison" and you are indicating
00127
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 137
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 138
1-136
2
3
20024
(202)
554-2345
5
30л
YTH STREET,
S.l.
REPORTERS BUILDING,
HASHTSTON,
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
17
20
to this committee that there was analysis made of a person's
voice, not the memory of a transcriber. It is a technical job.
It is not something that you leave to somebody who is merely
a translator, and you just finished telling us that a voice
comparison was made. Your own memorandum there on page 21
says that, in fact, one could not have been made.
What is the truth here?
Ms, Goodpasture. I think that what happened was that
the voice comparison, by taking the two tapes, I think the
tape. had been destroyed,
Based on my memory now --
MI. Dodd.
What you just said a minute ago
Ms. Goodpasture. To tell you the truth, I do not
remember.
Mr. Dodd. What you just said a moment ago is not
true, then, that there is not a voice comparison?
Ms, Goodpasture, What I said a moment ago was based on
a note that had been made in the files, that the transcriber
hadicompared the voices, and this note was written 14 years
ago.
23
21
25
Mr. Dodd. Based upon your working knowledge of the
terminology of voice comparison, does that normally involve
listening to two tapes with someone who is technically trained
to make a determination as to whether of not the voices on two
different tapes are one and the same person?
001278
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC
HH 50955
DocId: 32277224 Page 138
---
## Page 139
1-137
2
20024 (202)
554-2345
10
12
SON PTH STREET,
5. W.
REPORTEKS
BUTLDING,
Ms. Goodpasture. The way it was used, to me it would
also mean that a person who had listened to two tapes at
different times and said that they were the same, that it
would be a comparison by him.
Mr. Dodd. That was considered a bona fide voice
comparison?
Ms. Goodpasture. Not in the technical sense that you
are referring to.
You are correct.
MI. Dodd. Counsel, you may proceed. I am awfully
confused about your statement.
Ms• Goodpasture. I apologize for that. It is a con
fusion tame of so much material at one time, going over it
and the details of it. But I honestly do not remember being
present when those tapes were listened to, or a conversation
relating to it, It was this material that came up in the
files.
1á
17
20
21
22
23
•24
23
Mr. Dodd.
You understand, when you are talking aout
voices being compares, you are comparing a tape of someone
speaking.
Ms• Goodpasture. Right.
MI. Dodd,: You cannot make a comparison based on a
transcript or someone's memory of a tape that had been
destroyed, by your own testimony:
Ms. Goodpasture. A better way to explain it would have
been, probably, if this occurred, would have been to have
001279
ALDERSON RESORTING COMPANY, INC.
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 139
---
## Page 140
1-138
2
3
20029 (202)
554-2315
300
ITH STREET,
S.H:
REPCRTERS
BUILDING,
MASHINOTON,
7
3
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
17
20
21
23
24
25
said that the transcriber who listened to both tapes said
that it was the same person rather than using the term
"voice comparison."
Mr. Dodd. You sent out this memo. Let me refer you
to page 67.
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes, sir.
Mr. Dodd.: Stack C.
I am looking. at thiso newz story here.""o""
Can. I ask you, is that your handwriting on the bottom there?
You see the documentation?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, sir.
Mr. Dodd. Whose handwriting is that?
Ms. Goodpasture. It is mine.
Mr. Dodd. Read that for me. I can't read your hand-
writing too well. What does that say?
Ms. Goodpasture.
It says the caller from the Cuban
Embassy was unidentified until Headquarters sent traces on
Oswald and voices compared by
who is the Soviet
translator.
Mr. Dodd. When did you make that annotation?
Ms. Goodpasture. When?
MI. Dodd. Yes.
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know.
Mr. Dodd. Approximately?
Ms. Goodpasture. I would assume we made it some time
001280
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC
HN 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 140
---
## Page 141
1-139
2
• 3
after the date of this article.
To answer your question.
truthfully, I do not know.
MI: Dodd..: Was it ten years ago, a year ago?
Ms. Goodpasture. The date on this article was 21 October
554-2345
1964.
7
20024
10
300 7711
STREET.
S.W
REPORTERS BUILDING,
12
Mr. Dodd. Would you have done it right at the time that
the article had come out?
Ms: Goodpasture. I will tell you --
MI. Dodd. Unfortunately, we are going to have to
break again for another vote and I am going to come back
again in five minutes. In that five minutes, I want you to
think very hard about when you made that annotation. I am
going to ask you to
give me an answer to that.
I do not want to have to remind you here that you are
sworn to tell the whole truth to this Committee and it is
vitally important.
Ms. Goodpasture. That is what I have been trying to
14
1$
1ớ
17
18
19
20
21
do.
23
25
MI. Dodd. This is a very important matter. We will
take a recess and come back in five minutes and I would like
you to think about it during those five minutes, and then I
would like you to give me your best answer to that question
I just asked you.
We will stand in recess.
(A brief recess was taken.)
001281
NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 141
ALCERSON REFORTINO COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 142
1-140
REPORTERS
NUILDING,
CaSINHOTON.
D.C.
2002%
(202)
554-2345
5
7.
3
$
10
12
13
14
15
300
OTH STREET.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
MI. Dodd. Picking up, Mrs. Goodpasture, where we left
off at the time of the last break and you have had a few
minutes to think over my question, I do not want you to think
for one second that I am particularly being tough in any
way. It is just that these are very, very important ques-
tions and I would like you to answer you as honestly and as
candidly as you can as to when you think you made that
notation.
Ms. Goodpasture. I think that I made the notation within
about a week or ten days after the date of the newspaper
article, because this was a Washington article and it would
have been sent to us in Mexico through a pouch.
Mr. Dodd. 1964?
Ms. Goodpasture. I think it would have been some time
towards the end of October, 1964.
MI. Dodd. Did
. I understand you correctly to respond
to counsel's question, turning to page 22, that you were
the releasing officer, authenticating officer - which was it
on that memo? Did I hear your response to that correctly?
Mr. Goldsmith. Were you the authenticating officer of
this memo?
Ms. Goodpasture.
Yes.
Mr. Dodd. You were the authenticating officer for
that memo?
Ms. Goodpasture.
001282
Cable.
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
HH 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page 142
---
## Page 143
1-141
2
3
OTH STREET,
s.l.
REPORTERS
BUILDING,
WASNTNGTON, D.C.
20024
3
10
•-.
12
13
14
15
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
Mr. Dodd. Cable dated 23 November 1963?
MS. Goodpasture. Yes, sir.
MI. Dodd. I read to you again paragraph 2. "In view
Oswald Soviet Union. In fact, he claimed on 1 October, the
envoy" -- whatever that is - "to have visited the Soviet
Embassy 28 September:
Subject paragraph 1 probably Oswald.
Station unable to compare voice as first tape erased prior
second call."
That is November, 1963 and in October of '64, "Voices
compared by
Which is true?
Ms. Goodpasture.
The notation was made in 1964 on this
newspaper article. I think that I was referring to the trans-
criber, Mr. Tarasoff's, identifying the man as having made
both calls in listening to the tapes.
Mi. Dodd. Why did you not make that same observation
on 23. November 1963?
Ms. Goodpasture. That was a mistake I made that I should
not have made. I should have stated it exactly as it occurred
so we would not be in doubt now. But I do not know.
Mr. Dodd.
So the statement made on 23 November '63 is
inaccurate?
Ms. Goodpasture.
To the best of my knowledge, it is.
I am sure I could not locate the tapes, or I would not have
put that in the cable.
Mr. ODodd. Thank you.
001283
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 143
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 144
1-142
2
3
20024
(202)
554-2345
7
REPORTERS
RUTI.DING.
MASHINGTON.
10
300
ITH STREET.
12
13
!
15
15
17
18
19
20.
21
Counsel, you may proceed.
MI. Goldsmith. Thank you.
In this regard, I would like to refer to Stack B, the
document, page 1 in Stack B, which is the transcript ofithe
conversation in reference to Oswald. That is Stack B, page
1. This is a transcription of a conversation involving
Oswald that took place on 1 October 1963.
By the line which immediately follows the number 151
in brackets it says "the same person who phoned a day or so
ago and spoke in broken Russian."
Viewing this language in connection with page 67 of
Stack C, that is the newspaper article that we were just
referring to -
Ms • Goodpasture. 67.
MI. Goldsmith. Page 67, the newspaper article that
we were just referring to. I direct your attention to the
last paragraph of that article, the one that is marked off,
specifically the one that is adjacent to your marginal nota-
tion.
23
21
23
Would you please read that?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. Might it not be said that, viewing these
two items together, the language in this paragraph and the
statement in brackets, the same person who phoned a day of so
ago and spoke broken Russian, that it was apparent that swald,
001284
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 144
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 145
1-143
2
3
5
ó
20024
(202)
WaSHINGTON,
3
9
• 10
11
12
13
14
15
300 7TH
STREET,
=
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
in fact, had visited
the Cuban Embassy earlier?
Ms. Coodpasture: Would you repeat that again, please?
Mr. Goldsmith. Viewing these two documents together,
the last paragraph of the article, the language in brackets,
it says, "The same person who phoned a day or so ago and
spoke in broken Russian."
Does it not become apparent that Oswald, in fact, had
visited the Cuban Embassy earlier?
I admit that is not a direct inference that can be
drawn, but if you follow the transcripts, if you go back to
the preceding Saturday and you review the transcripts from
that day, it becomes apparent that Oswald had been at the Cuban
Embassy on Saturday. The point that I am getting at is that
independent of these documents here, it would seem that a
voice comparison, in fact, would have to. have been made.
Ms. Goodpasture. I think that he recognized the voice
from having listened to a tape ofithe Cuban
Embassy that had
Russian on it but did not have a name, instead of just
listening to two tapes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Going back to page 22 of Stack C it
says, "station unable to compare voice as first tape erased
prior receipt second call."
Does that suggest to you at at the time that this cable
was sent the second tape wasastill in existence? It says
one tape was destroyed or erased; the second one ias not.
001285
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 145
ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 146
1-144
2
3
S
NAPORTERS
NUEL.DTMG,
VPSHINICTON,
n. C. 20024 (202)
10
12
13
14
1
$
STREET.
7.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
Ms. Goodpasture. No, I think that it had been erased.
Mr. Goldsmith. You say both have been erased?
This says, "station unable to complete" -
Ms. Goodpasture. The first tape -
Mr. Goldsmith. Right. The first tape, according to
this cable, had been erased. What about the second tape?
Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me?
Mr. Goldsmith. What about the second tape?. There are
two tapes we are talking about.
Ms. Goodpasture. YOu said what about the second tape.
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes, that is what I said.
This seems to suggest that while the first tape had
been erased, the second tape has not been erased.
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. This cable is dated November 23, 1963.
What happened to the tape that was in existence on November
23, 1963?
Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think that it was still in
existence in November, 1963 but I think that it still was in
existence wien the tape from the second call cane back to us.
But the first one, we discovered, had been erased.
Mr. Goldsmith. This says, "station unable to compare
voice as first tape erased prior receipt second call." Why
does not the cable say instead --
Ms. Goodpasture. They both were erased. I do not know.
001286
ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC.
IW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 146
---
## Page 147
1-145
2
20024 (202)
558-2345
5
3
300
GIl STREET.
REFORTERS
BUTIDING,
LASHTNGTON,
10
12
13
15
17
18
19
20
23
..24
25
Mr. Goldsmith. I recalled earlier that your testimony
was that you looked for the tapes and that you could not
find the first one. That also suggests that this second one,
in fact, was found.
Was
the second tape found?
Ms. Goodpasture. Would you repeat that, please?
MI. Goldsmith.
Your testimony earlier was that you
looked for the tapes but you were unable to find the first
tape. You did not say that you were unable to find either
tape. You said that you were unable to find the first tape.
i
That, again, suggests that the second tape was found.
Ms. Goodpasture. No, I do not think I was able to find
any of the tapes that had Lee Oswald's calls on them. I found
the original transcripts, but I could not find the tapes that
had those calls.
Mr. Goldsmith. The calls in question came in between
September 27 and October 1, 1963, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. The first call?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Ms • Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Goldsmith. The first call came in, as it turns
out, September 27th. The last call that was attributed to
Oswald came in October Ist. So we have a timespan here of five
or six days in which the calls came in, and your testimony is
that the first tape was erased prior to the receipt of the
00128%
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 147
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 148
1-146
2
3
7T1
STREET.
5.W. REPORTERS BULLOG,
NASHTUGTON,
20024
(202)
9
10
12
13
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
74
25
second call, yet earlier, you indicated that the normal time
Lag was two weeks.
Here we have a tape being erased well before the normal
time lag. Do you have any explanation for that?
Ms. Goodpasture. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Referring to page 28, Stack C, could
you identify this document?
Ms. Goodpasture.: It is a copy of the cable sent from
Mexico to Washington, CIA Headquarters.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is the date on it?
Ms. Goodpasture. The date on it is 23 November 1963.
Mr. Goldsmith. Directing your attention to paragraph
4
of this particular document, would you please read that?
Ms. Goodpasture.
who did transcrip-
tion said Oswald is identical to person speaking broken
Russian who called from Cuban Embassy 28 September to Soviet
Embassy.
And that, I think, was taken from the information in this
transcript; B-1, line 151.
Mr. Goldsmith. Your response then is that - l si
Ms Goodpasture.iI think that was taken from this
statement in the October 1 transcript,
Mr. Goldsmith. At any time after the assassination of
the President, did anyone go to Boris Tarasoff who is the
person referred to, whose pseudonym was
001288
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 148
ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 149
1-147
2
3
HASHTNCION,
n.C.
20024
(202)
5518-2345
5
3
10
?!
12
13
at any time after the assassination did anyone go to Mr.
Tarasoff and ask him whether the person speaking in these
conversations was the same person?
Ms. Goodpasture. I did not, but I did not see it.
The person who saw him was Herb Minell and that was his case
officer. The outside person for the electronic surveillance
delivered tapes to me, but he did not
•give them guidance or
supervision. That was given to him by Mr. Minell, who would
have been the one who would have gone to him and talked to him
about this
MI. Goldsmith. This paragraph number 4 seems to suggest,
does it not, that
was actually specifically asked
whether Oswald was the same person appearing in each conversa-
tion.
30 л
ITI STREET,
.W.
REPORTERS
15
• 1'
17
18
19
20
??
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. It could be interpreted that way of
it could also have been taken from this other transcript.
MI. Goldsmith.: And finally, I would like you to compare
the statement in paragraph 4 of this cable with paragraph 2
on page 22,
(Pause)
Paragraph 4 indicates that
said that Oswald
is identical with the person in paragraph 1 speaking broken
Russian, yet the earlier cable on page 22, the second para-
graph -- this is your cable - you report that the station was
unable to compare the voices. Is there any way to resolve the
001289
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 149
---
## Page 150
1-148
3
Э0n
ITH STREET,
s.H.
REPORTERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON,
n.C.
20024 (202)
554-2315
7
3
.10
12
13
15
inconsistency?
Ms. Goodpasture, The only explanation is the one I made
previously, is that the two tapes were still not available at
that time to compare and we had to take the transcriber's
word for it.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would also like to point out that
paragraph 2, the very last line, the first two words, it says
"probably Oswald." Is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Page 22?
Mr. Goldsmith. Page 22, the second paragraph, the last
line, it says "probably Oswald."
Ms Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. This cable is Mexico 7023.
Then, two cables later, 7025, the fourth paragraph, it
says
who did transcriptions, says
Oswald is identical. We no longer have any words of qualifica-
tions.
17
18
20
71
22
24
23
I am referring now to page 29, paragraph 4.
Ms. Goodpasture.
What page is the other one?
Mr. Goldsmith.: Page 29, paragraph 4. It says,
who did transcription, says Oswald is identical. The earlier
cable says, "probably Oswald. Unable to compare voice as
first tape erased prior to receipt of the second."
Two cables later, it says that
says Oswald is
identical with the person speaking broken Russian who called
001290
ALCERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955
DocId: 32277224
Page 150
---
## Page 151
1-149
2
3
from the Cuban Embassy on September 28th.
What happened between the time that Mexico 7023 was sent
out and Mexico 7025 was sent out to account for this differ=.
ence?
(202)
554-2315
300
STREET,
S.V.
REPORTERS
BUILDING.
VASHINGTON, D.
3
10
!!
12
13
15
1T
19
20
23
23
Ms. Goodpasture.' The only explanation I can give is
that we went over the files again and we found the references
that the transcriber had made, the statements that he had
made, that it was the same person. Oh, MI. Minell could have
gone out and talked with him.
In your interview with Mr. Minell, I am sure that he
would remember if he did.
Mr. Dodd. Let me interrupt for one second.
Miss Goodpasture, at the time that you were sitting down
and having discussions over these November 23 -- over this
23 November, 1963, when you were sitting down and comparing
these two memorandum; was MI. Tarasoff ever present in the
preparation of these memos?
Ms.: Goodpasture. Did MI. Tarasoff ever --
Mx. Dodd. Was he present during the preparations of
these memos and these discussions you were having?
Ms. Goodpasture. You mean this one?
MI. Dodd. I am talking about page 22, the memorandum
on which you were the authorizing officer, the memorandum
involving paragraph 4 on page 29 where
that Oswald is identical.
says
001291
NW 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 151
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
---
## Page 152
1-150
Ms. Goodpasture. No, he was not present.
MI. Dodd. He was not present for any of those discus-
3
sions?
30п
ITH STREET.
s.V.
REPORTERS BULLDING, MASHINCTON, D. C. 20024
(202)
554-2345
5
3
$
10
!!
12
13
• 1.5
17
18
19
..20
23
24
23
Ms. Goodpasture. No.
The reason was that he was located outside of the
Embassy and these were not taken outside.
Mr. Dodd. Did you ever personally speak to Mr. Tarasoff?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, I have spoken to him personally.
Mr. Dodd. Did you speak to him at the time?
Ms. Goodpasture. No. I was not in touch with him at
this time?
MI. Dodd. Did you speak to him - how did you know he
compared the voices?
Ms • Goodpasture. Pardon me?
MI: Dodd:
How do you know he compared the voices if
you did not speak to him?
Ms • Goodpasture.:
I took it from this transcript, I
think, from a statement made here that he typed himself, the
P 1-B is a copy of a transcript prepared by Tarasoff, on his
typewriter.
MI. Dodd. Let us suspend for a second.
(Pause)
Go ahead.
Mr, Goldsmith. Probably you will not believe this.
I
only have a few more questions.
0n1202
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.
NW
50955 DooId:32277224 Page 152
---
## Page 153
1-151
2
3
554-2345
300
ITH STREET.
S.V. REPORTERS
BUTLDING.
WASHINGTON,
12
13
15
18
1.9
20
21
1]
24
23
Turning to page 30 of the documents in Stack C, this
is a duplicate of Mexico number 7025, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
MI. Goldsmith.
This is the same cable that in paragraph
4 makes a reference to
saying that Oswald is identi-
cal with the person who spoke broken Russian involved in the
Cuban Embassy on September 28th, is that correct?
'Ms. Goodpasture. Wait a minute, I am not following you,
page 30?
Mr. Goldsmith. Turn to page 30. That is a duplicate
of 7025. That is the Mexico copy of 7025.
Ms: Goodpasture. Mexico 7025, right.
Mr. Goldsmith. This is your copy, the one that you
referred to earlier?
On page 28 and 29 was the copy that
went to headquarters, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. We are talking about the same
cable now. In each case, paragraph 4 makes the same reference
to Oswald's being identical, et cetera, et cetera. Who was
the authenticating officer, page 32, I believe.
Ms. Goodpasture. I am.
Mr. Goldsmith. Turning back to page 23, which refers
to Mexico 7023,lwho is the authenticating officer of that
cable?
Ms. Goodpasture. I am.
001293
'ALDERSON REPORTIE COMPANY, INC.
NN 50955 DooId: 32277224
Page 153
---
## Page 154
1-152
2
3
20024
(202)
3
ITH STREET.
S.W.
REPORTERS
AUILDING
VASILICTON,
10
i2
13
14
15
17
18
.20
.?!
22
24
Mr. Goldsmith. Yet, in the first cable, you say
"probably. Oswald. Station unable compare voice as first tape
erased prior receipt second call.". And in the second cable
you state, "Oswald is identical," without any lanquage of
qualification.
Ms. Goodpasture. I said that the transcriber said he
was identical, right?
Mr. Goldsmith. Did anything happen?
Ms. Goodpasture, In the other one, we were unable to
have the tapes for someone else to compare them, for other
people to listen to them or to send them to headquarters for
them tolisten to then, but we did have on record from this
transcript that he had prepared that Tarasoff said that the
calls were made by the same man.
MI. Goldsmith. You have no explanation for why the
Oswald tapes would have been erased within six days of their
receipt by the Mexico City station as opposed to within the
normal two-week period.
Ms, Goodpasture. No, I cannot explain it.
MI. Goldsmith. One final question. Have you discussed
the testimony that you have given us today, have you discussed
that with anyone prior to coming here today?
Ms. Goodpasture. Have I discussed the testimony?
MI. Goldsmith.:
Have you discussed the nature of your
testimony with anyone prior to your coming here today?
001294
ALDERSON REPORTING CEMPANY, INC.
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 154
---
## Page 155
1-153
2
3
20024
(202)
554-2345
5
7
10
'!
12
13
REPORTERS BUILDING.
15
17
JON ITH STREET,
20
21
23
24
25
Ms. Goodpasture. The only discussion I had was a
confusion about my coming up, which I discussed when I
arrived, and there was a misunderstanding of my being brought
up here.
Mr. Goldsmith.
I am aware of that.
Have you discussed the substance of your testimony with
anybody, or what you thought would be your testimony with
anyone?
Ms. Goodpasture. No, I have not talked with anyone since
I left here yesterday:
Mr. Goldsmith.
Since you left the Committee's offices
yesterday, is that correct?
Ms. Goodpasture. That is right.
•I left your office
yesterday.
Mr. Goldsmith. I have nothing further.. Thank you
very much
Mr. Chairman?
Mr. Dodd. MI. Preyer, do you have any questions?
MI. Preyer: I have no further questions at this time.
MI. Dodd. Mrs. Goodpasture, first of all, I would like
to request of you that you leave your address or addresses
with the Legislative Counsel of the CIA from time to time.
so if we feel a need to
get back in touch with you, we can
contact them and they can locate you for us, If you would
do that, I would appreciate it.
001295
NH 50955 DocId: 32217224 Page 155
ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
---
## Page 156
1-154
2
3
(202)
554-2345
5
ó
7
$
REPONTERS BUILDING,
WASHINGTON,
10
12
13
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
Secondly, I want you to know that we are grateful to
you for appearing before your Committee. You have been help
ful and we are grateful to you for that.:
I want to apologize to you if I seemed to be a little
abrasive on that one point, which is that we are trying to
get to the truth of this as quickly as we can. Under our
rules of this Committee, we give each witness an opportunity
at the conclusion of their testimony to take five minutes and
sum up or add any additional information that you feel might
be helpful to this Committee or to correct what you may feel
are any inconsistencies or confusion over testimony that you
have given this committee, and I will ask you now to take
advantage, if you would so desire, of five minutes or so to
make that summation.
Ms, Goodpasture. The only thing that I could think of
right now is that I feel that some of the papers here are
probably out of context and still have some errors in them,
and those errors that come up, I am sure they are human
errors and there may be more of them.
I know. in this one draft of background material, I just
guessed at the dates when people were there as well as names,
as well as much of the information about the situation in
Mexico at that time, because it was to be used as a framework
for trying to pull together the documents that would be needed
to present a true picture of what the agency had in their
001296
ALESASON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
NH 50955 DocId: 32277224
Page 156
---
## Page 157
1-155
2
3
2002*
(202)
554-2345
5
ó
10
files or the situation that was there at that time.
That is about all I car think of now.
Mr. Dodd.
Thank you.
All right, Miss Goodpasture, you are excused as a
witness. Again, on behalf of the Committee, I express my
gratitude to you.
Mr: Preyer. I want to congratulate you on your stamina
Miss Goodpasture:
Mr. Dodd. Unless there is any further business before
this Subcommittee, we will stand in recess until further
call of the Chair.
(Whereupon, at 3:45 pim, the Subcommittee recessed to
reconvene at the call of the chair.)
13
T4
5
OTIl STREET,
13
17
20
21
23
24
23
00129%
ALDERSON REPORTING COMFANY, INC.
HW 50955
DooId: 32277224
Page
157
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10234-10140.pdf | 104-10234-10140 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 03/19/1966 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | JMWAVE | CABLE RE:BELIEVE POSSIBILITY CENSORSHIP AMTRUNK-19 MSGS 5 AND 6 (REF B) CLEARED UP IN REF C | 3 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK64-51 : F9 : 1998.06.14.18:01:34:153115 : | 3 | ## Page 1
104-10234-10140
CRAISIFY TO BILE NO,
A-GIE TO FILE ND..
FILE AIDD ACT. TO DRANCH D
DESTROY
• 7660
Chic.
*ED MESSAGE
50/55 SECRET
PERSON/UNIT NOTIFIRO
TOTAL COPIES
REPROOUCTION PROMIBITED
TC
18|C6-199
To 1:1-
aLF:
•i,12
(a38 D 1
VING
ADVANCE CoAr
Winless
SAND COPY
Duca Dioro Drusco
68680
ILE, VE DES, COPS, CILOA, COMMO I; FL, FUZ M
SE CRST 193025Z
DIR INFO MADR CITE WAVE 9706-
TYPIC AMMOON MHAPRON AUTRUNK-19, COMMO
REF A DIR 88648
19105076526
C WAVE 9657 GN7665
D HAVE 8471 (N35492)
1 BELIEVE POSSIBILITY CENSORSHIP AMTRUNK-19 MSGS
5 AND 5 (REF B) CLEARED UP IN REF 6 AND UFCA 24782, DATED
17 MAR 550 AS STATED REF 6, COMPARISON LAST 4 A -19 MSGS
INDICATES CENSORSHIP ANY A-19 MSGS IMPROBABLE®
2. ALTHOUGH WAVE AWARE DATE LAST A-19 SW MSG (REF C)
PREDATES AMLASH-1/AMTRUNK-10 ARREST, UFGA 24782 POINTS OUT
INDEPENDENT LINK AMICE-14 FAMILY HAS GIVEN NO INDICATION
AMTRUNK-19 IN ANY. DIFFICULTY WITH GOC. AMICE-14 AND AMTRUNK
• 19 HAVE MANY MUTUAL RELATIVES INSIDE CUBA (SOME AS PRO-REGIME
AS AMICE-14 AND AMTRUNK-11 ARE ANTI-) AND THESE
RELATIVES KEEP A-14 AND OTHER COUSINS RESIDENT WAVE AREA
POSTED THRU TELEPHONE CALLS AND LETTER CORRESPONDENCE. LAST
TELECON ON 12 MAR SY A-1A COUSIN WAVE AREA INDICATES A-14
AIMLASH -1
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHiNITED
Corlead lager sus,
shaunagrating rod
ericanone
Copy No
---
## Page 2
PAGE 2 VAVE 97OG SECRET SECZE
MOTHER WHO NAMED DURING AMLASH-I TRIAL AS SAFEHOUSE AND
IN 78526 PAgez
ACCOMMODATION ADDRESS KEEPER STILL FREE FROM JAIL OR
HARASSMENT. SINCE ORIGINAL NOTIFICATION AMTRUNK-11 ARREST
CAME WAVE THRU THIS CHANNEL (REF D), BELIEVE THIS MEDIUM
WAVE BEST ADVANCE INDICATOR ANY GOC MOVES AGAINST A -19.
3. AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY LCFLUTTER A-19 NEXT TRIP
MADR TO RESOLVE A-19 MOTIVES AND CLEAR UP MINOR SW
DEFICIENCIES. CONCUR MADR ACCOM ADDRESS WOULD BE QUICKER
AND MORE SECURE. WOULD SUGGEST, HOWEVER, THAT A-I9 RETAIN
WAVE ACCOM ADDRESS AS ALTERNATE MEANS COMMO. VIEW
DEMONSTRATED A-19 GRASP SW TECHNIQUE, POSSIBLY ENCRYPTED
SW WOULD ALSO CONTRIBUTE A-I9 SECURITY.
4O VIEW A-19 SW MSG & STATING CUBANA HAS DISCONTINUED
PUBLISHING ADVANCE CREW SCHEDULE, ALTERNATE CHANNEL RE
NOTIFICATION HIS NEXT TRIP MADR COULD BE INITIATED BY A-19
THRU COMMERCIAL CABLE USING METHOD DESCRIBED PARA 27,
ATTACHHENT TO UFGA 23922, 38 NOV 65. WAVE ACCOM ADDRESS NOT
•SET UP RECEIVE COMMERCIAL CABLES.
5. A-19 SW MSGS 6 AND S (DISSEMINATED IN UFG 8082
---
## Page 3
PAGE 3 VAVE 970S SEE BET MS
AND UFG 8048) TOUCH ON PARA 3F REF A RUMTS•
1N78526 Page 3
6. WAVE CONTINUING RESERVE OWVL SCHEDULE IN
ANTICIPATION COMPLETING THIS COMMO LINK TO A-19.
SECRET
CFN 9706 AMTRUNK-19 88640 9442 9657 8471 19 5 6 B C UFGA 24782
17 66 C 4 A-19 A-19 A-19 SW C AMLASH-! AMTRUNK-10 UFGA 24782
AMICE 14 NO INDICATION 19 GOC 14 19 14 11 ANTI A-14 12 A-14 A-14
1 11 D GOC A-19 A-19 A-79 SW A-19 A-19 SV A-19 A-19 SW 8 A-19
27 UFGA 23922 30 65 NOT SET A-19 SW 6 8 UFG 8002 UFG 8048 3F A
• A-19
BT
NANN
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-10287-10426.pdf | 124-10287-10426 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 09/30/1966 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 97-4474-314 | DIRECTOR, FBI | SAC, MM | 6 | FBI | HQ | 3/12/18 | INC NOTE | null | ## Page 1
124-10287-10426
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
6/4/2015
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER:
124-10287-10426
RECORD SERIES: HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 97-4474-314
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM:
SAC, MM
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI
TITLE:
'PAGES:
PACTE: 9/30/1966
SUBJECTS:
MIRR, OBA, COMANDOS L, BOMBING RAID, CUBA, NEWS
ARTIC
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Secret
RESTRICTIONS: 1A; 4
CURRENT STATUS: Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 06/26/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE, APPROVAL OF CIA
COMMENTS :
INC NOTE
N4'50953
DooId:32305296 Page 1
19
---
## Page 2
i.s.
SECRET:
TELETYPE UNIT
SEP 3 0 1966
•Mr. Casper-
Mr. Callahan...
Mr.
Conrad
NR--
30gt
ENCODER MESSACE
Mr. Felt
Mr. Gala
3:48PM URGENT 9-22-66 GPS
SEO
RET
Mr.
Rogen
CUNT
Mr.
SulliT
Mr.
Tav
TO BIRECTOR
SHICE RIVEP.!
Sassifled by
Beldon
CIA HAS NO
ChEt
DECI
ROAN TO
FROM MIAMISADAr IMi
CiA = 001
No pecas
DADR 91583
OF CIFIPORMATION
55211324
WANt
DOCUMENT
FaR
the BRAGn
A DOU IMENTO TASTIERRE RECUPERACION REVO CIQUARTA PERR) SEC
PAUFILE NINE SEVEN DASH FOUR FOUR SEVEN FOUR
CUBA.
place ce m
705-11712268-6)
MIAMI HERALD ISSUE OF
SEPT. THIRTY, NINETEEN SIXTYSIX, CONTAINS
ARTICLE TO EFFECI THAT CUBAN ARMED FORCES MINSTRY ANNONCED THURSDAY,
Spirit cil
SEPT. TWENTYNINE, SIXTYSIX, THAT AN AIRPLANE,
"APPARENTLY FROM THE UNITED STATES," ATTEMPTED BOMBING RAID ON THAT DAT
ON NORTH COAST PORT OF NUEVITAS. NUEVITAS IS IN CAMAGUEY PROVINCE 23-9
SOME THREE HUNDRED FIFTY MILES EAST OF HAVANA DECLASSIFY CIV: 25%
CLASSIFIED BY 5668 SLAS
CREDIT FOR RAID ACCORDING TO NEWSPAPER ARTICLE, WAS TAKEN
BLUFK)
MIRR
HEADED BY DR. ORLANDO BOSCH AVILA. MIRR' CLAIMED IT HAD
BEEN
AIDED
BY MEMBERS OF ANOTHER: ANTI DARN CASTRO GROUP, COMANDOS L.
ACCORDING TO NEWSPAPER, A COMMUNIQUE BROADCAST OVER RADIO CUBA
SAID PLANE CAME FROM THE NORTH, DROPPED ONE BOMB INTENDED FOR A THERMO
ELECTRIC PLANT. BOMB FELL FIVE
HUNDRED
METERS FROM TARGET. WITH NO
A-115
MATERIAL DAMAGE OR CASUALTIESREC
97-4474-31
PLANE DROPPED TWO OTHER BOMBS
AT NEARBY PUERTO
TARAFA, INTENDED
FOR WAREHOUSES BUT CHARMED BOMBS DID NOT EXPLODE
• ARTICLE WENT ON TO STATE THAI LATE 3
AMONG
DOT 1 19G
THERES
MOZACtUALL& 1966 THE ATTACK.
# rimiento Insurrecional
END PAGE ONE /
MR. DELOACH FOR THE DIRECTOR
RecupErAción
SECRET'
REVOLUCiOnAKiA
CATRON
E
copy
UNTEG
HH 50953 DocId:32305296 Page 2
---
## Page 3
Page
3
NH 50953
DocId: 32305296.
120
RECEIVED DIRECTRECO
FBI DON INTELL DIV.
RECO UP: 0AC$
19. Hd 65 S DE da
Der 1 12 53 04 966
N1O 7131N/ 81101
0.03Y
NOS it.
99. WY 90 01. €
DE dES
jfe Me io g
NOVA: 3: 1.034
FBI
Classified by 5P6 BIT
Declassity en: 0AD04/20/85
ALI INTOTNATION CONTAINES
HEREIN IS USEGASSIFIED.
FSCEPT MITE 3HOSN
UTILERNISE
49, ill LE
30I230E.N0.101
Dcr
RECU
Le
12 41 PM 35F
REC'O - SULLIVAN
1914"
РОЖА + 311, 326
AFPEALE
CIVIL ACT
E. 0. 1182
D: T= 9/201
ITTES CCL
(5-1) 6(040)(5)
IS ARMS
NOIM 0 038
I8 y
Q0 SS
° 101.
---
## Page 4
SECRET
CONX
PAGE TWO
SaptEmbER
077т 495-15
LON SEPT. THIRTY, SIXTYSIX, MM FOUR MINE TWO DASH'S ADVISED HE
HAD MONITORED CUBAN RADIO STATION CMQ WHICH IN ITS FIVE THIRTY AM NEWS
serenak
BROADCAST ON SEPT. THIRTY, SIXTYSIX, ANNOUNCED THE BOMBING OF A
SUGAR WAREHOUSE IN NUEVITAS. DESCRIBED BOMBING AS BEING MADE AT
SEPtEMbER
APPROXIMATELY ONE AM, ON IHURS. SEPT. TWENTYNINE, SIXTYSIX, BY A TWO
MOTORED AIRCRAFT FLYING VERY LOW WITHOUT LIGHTS• AIRCRAFT DROPPED THREE
BOMBS IN VICINITY OF THE PASTELILLO SUGAR WAREHOUSE IN NUEVITAS * U
SEptEmbErE
IIS SIX THIRTY AM BROADCAST ONLSERT. THIRTY, SIXTYSIR, MOU
531) 492
110(4)
NINE FHE
SAID
CUBAN RADIO STATION REBELDE ANOUNCED THAT TWO CUSTOMS
EMPOYESS GAVE FIRST HAND ACCOUNTS OF BOMBING INCIDENT. FIRST BOMB
LANDED BETWEEN WAREHOUSES NUMBER SIX AND TEN BUT DID NOT EXPLODE•
SECOND BOMB LANDED ON ROOF OF WAREHOUSE NUMBER TWO, FELL THROUGH THE
CEILING, AND DISINTEGRATED WITHOUT EXPLODING. THE THIRD BOMB EXPLODED
/ AT THE PASTELILLO SUGAR WAREHOUSE. ONE BOMB CONTAINED THE FOLLOWING
MARKINGS AND IDENTIFICATION/ "L DASH TEN DASH M THREE EIGHT DASH
TWO ORTHIRTYTWO, JANUARY NINETEEN SIXTYSIX. I
(PHONETIC).
END PAGE TWO
CONAKE TIAL
SECRET
HH 50953 DocId: 32305296 Page #
---
## Page 5
SECRET
139032
11
PAGE FOUR
VERtEMbER
SERT. THIRTY. SIXTYSIX
CENTRICIA COMIC MANAGERAL
WALLY
DEL TORO, "USAFAD COVERT DIAMO
ADVISED FLIGHT NOT SPONSORE
EITHER OF THOSE AGENCIES THAT
HAD NO INFO CONCERNING THIS MATTER
BUT WOULD ATTEMPI TO ASCERTAIN ADDITIONAL INFO RE RAID.
FEDERAl AViAtiUn
Administration
MIAMI HAS CONTACTED U.S. BORDER PATROL
AND FAA AND NEITHER AGENCY
HAS ANY INFO CONCERNING THIS FLIGHT OR IDENTITY OF AIRCRAFT IN ABSENCE
OF MORE SPECIFIC INFO CONCERNING PLANE•
MIAMI MAINTAINING CONTACT WITH LOGICAL SOURCES AND INFORMANIS AND
OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES CONCERNING THIS MATTER•
LECTErhEAD MEMORANDUM
WILL SUBMIT LAM SUITABLE FOR DISSEMINATION AND WILL KEEP BUREAU ADVISED
OF PERTINENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS MATTER.
END
is now
FBI WASH DC
Downs too por
CLA INFO URI REMANIS GLASSIFEO
9883nda/ge 24,326 3/30/92
PeR menus a/ia/so 018.
98031dd/ge1 21132657192
(JF14)
Xerox copies to : DE LOACH
WANNALL
NASCA
MTIVAN.
SECRET
HH 50953
DocId: 32305296
Page 5
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32264272.pdf | 180-10111-10367 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | 04/20/1977 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 015072 | GENERAL MAGNIFICO | 4 | CITIZEN | 2/7/18 | Box #:291. | 4 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
10/13/20
•AGENCY : HSCA
RECORD NUMBER :
180-10111-10367
RECORD SERIES:
NUMBERED FILES
AGENCY FILE NUMBER:
015072
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: CITIZEN
FROM:
GENERAL MAGNIFICO
TO :
TITLE :
DATE :
PAGES:
SUBJECTS :
04/20/1977
4
GENERAL MAGNIFICO
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
DOCUMENT TYPE :
LETTER
CLASSIFICATION :
Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS :
Open in Full
CURRENT STATUS :
Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW :
07/12/1993
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS :
Box #:291.
v9.1
NW 55923
Doold:32264272
Fage 1
---
## Page 2
2022
Offi
pras
1a247a
GENERAL SERVICEE ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL PERSONNEL RECOROS CENTER
MILITARY PERCONNEL RECONDS,"
ALL POINTS BULLETIN
Political kidnaping with
intended murder an 20
DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL
"WARNING AGAINST CLARENCE M. KELLEY;
THE DOMESTIC
BUREAU OP
NAMED.ON
THE
BACK
OF THIS PAGE
INVESTIGATION AND THOSE CO-CONSPIRATORS
BY THE
STATES GRIFFIN
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED
BELL.
• WARNING TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY
ARE CHARGED WITH VIOLATIONS OF
CONCERN: CLARENCE M- KELLEY AND CO-CONSPIRATORS
18, UNITED STATES
(CONSPIRACY),
1201 (KIDNAPING)",
CODE, , SECTIONS
201 (BRIBERY: & GRAFT),
1001 (FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS)
351
CATIONS),
2311 (STOLEN PROPERTY),
2510 (WIRE INTERCEPTION & INTERCEPIION OF.TORAL
*111 (ASSAULT),
BURGLARY),
2231 (SEARCHES "&" SEIZURES);
COMMUNI-
2071 (RECORDS & REPORTS),
2111 (ROBBERY &
1901 (PUBLIC OFFICERS
1751 (PRESIDENTIAL ASSASSINATIONS, KIDNAPING & ASSAULT).
& EMPLOYEES),
1541 (PASSPORTS & VISAS);.:
1501 (OBSTRUCTION,
1581 REPYARES & WAVENY 1361 (MALICIOUS MISCHIEF)?"* 1341 (MAIL/ FRAUD) 3
1621 (PERJURY) OF JUSTICEL
1111 (HOMICIDE );
871 (EXTORTION & THREATS).
641 (EMBEZZLEMENT & THEFT )
591 (BLECTIONS & POLIVICAL
791 (ESPIONAGE & CENSORSHIP),
351 CONGRESSIONAL ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPING & ASSAULTI, ETC.
ACTIVITIES),
TO:ALI JUDGES, JUSTICES AND ALI
TOSALI
COURTS EMPLOYEES EVERYWHERE:
10: ALL
EMPLOYEBS OF. BOTH HOUSES OF UNITED STATES CONGRESS;
POLICE,
ALL
SHERIFFS,
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
1103
OF
ALL LAW ENFORCING OFFICERS & AGENCIES EVERYUHERE:
POST OFFICES & POSTAL
ALL
SERVICE;
EMPLOYEES OF ALL
MOTOR
1O:
10:
ALL
DOCTORS, PSYCHIATRISTS;
VEHIGLE DEPTS IN ALL STATES:
ALI
"EMPLOYERS OF
DOCTORS
CHIEFS
OF
AND HOSPITALS:
456 ladd
TO:
ALI
u.s.
POLICE EVERYWHERE AND ALL DISTRICT ATTORNEYS;
ATTORNEYS,
u.s.
TO:
ALL
TO:
EMPLOYEES. OF ALL FEDERAL,
MARSHALS AND EVERY STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL;
STATE,
Aul.
MAYORS, CITY COUNCILS AND THEIR EMPLOYEES,
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL
COURTS:
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION;
KOSLAUPATIS.
AIRLINES,
ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES,
BUS LINES
MARKETS,
15309
MERCHANDISE STORES,
PIRE
AIRPORT EMPLOYEES,
BAKKS,
SUPERIOR COURTS, MUNICIPAL
COURTS,
SUPREME
COURT. OF
COURTS,
DEPTS: POST OFFICES,
APPEAL'S
THE
SUPREME
THE UNITED STATES, ALL
COURTS
STATE HOSPITALS,
SHERIFPS PACILITIES,
CITY COUNCILS,
PRISONS,
POLICE FACILITIES,
WARNING LI
MERA MAGNIFICO, THE DEPUTY PRESIDENT
I UNICE TO COLAR FEMALE GENERAT
INVIERNATIONAL
DIRECTOR OF THE
122 VES MARINE, CORP: STNCE
I ADICE: J/2041: COMMANDIRE CENTRAT OF
THE PLOT TO KIDRAP
GENE RAI:: MACH IPICO
M. KELLEY
THE
DOMESTIC DIRECTOR OF INE, P.B.T.
CLARBACE
FOR AND WITH CERTAIN; KNOW;
CONSPIRATORS (SEE BACK OF PAGE) BY USING ILLEGALLY AND UNLAWFULLY AND
CRIMINALLY THE
FACILITIES AND
PERSONNEL OF
FIELD OFFICES.
THE PEDERAL BÚREAU OF
INVEST ICATTON
1Y40EAO 7052
6027943
CLARENCE M. KELLEY -PRI,
NICHOLAS P.
CALLAHAN
THOMAS J
JENKINS-
JAMES B.
ADAMS -
EUGENE
WALSH
MADNEW J.
130.
DONALD.
DECKER
W. - MOORE,
973E3 JOHN JO'MCDERMOTT
JR.
GALLACHER
HAROLD
BASSETT
.W. RAYMOND WANNALI
COCHRAN ,JR
* 20 JOHN AB MINTZ
HERBERT E. HOXIF
IWM.V.
CLEVELAND
WM M..
-MOONEY
JOHN W.
WM C. SULLIVAN
JOHN P.
POTATO, BULLTIN, ON MAY FIRS
MOHR
1977, THE KIDAPINO PLOT IS PLANNID TO PARE PIACE UFON TRB' ARRIVNI OF GEMIRAI
THOMAS E. BISHOP
ROBERT F.
GE BHARDT
SACH RICO
ON TA AIRLINES PROM
AT
Z0D0 P.M
LOS ANILES AT TRE AIRPORT IN ST.
LOUIS,
JOSEPH J.
BF. EX
RENTED. AT
A RIOGED: PLANTED: AUTO, PROM
CASPER
LOUIS,
THE NATIONAL' CAR RENTAI.
IVAN W.
MISSOURDENHICH, IS TO
AGINCY HAS -
TAKF
GENERAI MAGNIFICO AWAY
WASON
G.
CAMPBELL
PROP THE AIRPORT TO THE: PLACE-WHERE "SHEIS TO BE KIDNAPED' AND LATER KILLED
ROBT RUSS PRANCK
AREA.WHERE THE, CRIME- IS-PLANNED- NO:
"X PERT A COSE GARUD SECRET A TAL ATTORNEY CREEL OF TINED.50
MARK FELT
"GALE""
AND FIVERY PERSON INVOLVED IN THE CONSPIRACY IS BEING CLOSELY WATCHED BY F.B.I.
ALEX ROSEN
AGENTS WHO ARE WORKING DIRECTLY UNDER THE ATTÓRNEY GENERAL AND ARE ORDERED TO
CHAS D.
BRENNAN
GO OVER THE HEAD OF CLARENCE M.
wM.S.'
KELLEY AND THOSE IN HIS OFFICE.
NANTAL
THE ATTORNEY, GENERAL: OF. THE UNITED ETATES GRIPPIN BELL MAKES THIS REPEATPI
LEONARD M.
WALTERS
ARMING TO ALI
50P N09
•FLETCHER: D.") THOMPSON
OPFICER ON ACTIVE ...
HELEN GANDY
THIS IS A FINAL WARNING FOR ALI
JACOBSON
FUNNEX OR SUYTER TRE: CONSEQUENCES AS STAIRD ABOVE IN FAN WARNINGS
4ECCO CERNARD S.
MILLER
10 AID AND ABET CLARENCE KELLEY AND HIS COLLASORATORS ANY FURTHER HILL CAUSE
BRIGGS S.
WHITE
ALL CHARGES NAMED HEREIN TO BE PLACED AGAIRST THOSE PERSONS WHO DO NOT HEED
RICHARD J.
THOMAS J.
BAKER
BITS WARNING IN THIS CONSPIRACY OR ANY LEON
JENKINS
WESLEY
GRAPP
NW. 55923 DocId: 32264272 - Fage 2
NAMES OP
OF THE
THOSE UNDER INVESTIGATION, BY THE ATTORNEY EMERAI
FOR CRIMES
UNITED STATES GRIPPIN BELI: &-THE CONGRESS OF U.S.
ON OFLAY E SIDE OF PAG:
RICHARO, M.
NiXON.
THOMAS L.
CORDIN, JERRORE S.
GRANT,
ALLEN MILLER. :DR.
JOHN SHERMAN COOPER,
OLIVER,
THRUSTOS MORTON
'BERLINER, DR.
HAMMETT,
GORE,
DOCTORS.OF
WESTHOOD PRIVATE.
DR DOROTRY
Lades:
•BARRINGTON..
PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
PROTEM
JOAN
..
LA:", JUDGE LEOPOLDO
DR.
CARNEY, DR. RONALD
SANCHEZ,
JUDA!.
SEYMOUR POLLACHI
MARKMAN; DR.
DR. ALVIN DAVIS,
ROOF.
WILFRED- ROOF,
.:3401
HARVEX MCKEE.
ROOP
MAMIE EISENHOWER,
KOENAKE,
BETTY PORD,
GERALD R.
KENNEDY ONASSIS,
LADY BIRD JOHNSON,
JACKIE
MARGARET
M.K.
MARLOWE
HALDEMAN, JOHN EHRLICKMAN,
TRUMAN DANIELS, PAT NIXON, JOHN
• CHARLES COLSON,
& SONS JOHN,
FAMILY,
DEWEY,
GENE, JAMES & MARK V:.
MARTIN
STILL, DONALD DAWSON,
RAY,
LAVINIA (MRS.
i Statu
TOM
JAMES -STEWARI, ATTY.. CHAS S. LEEDS,
---
## Page 3
CLERK®
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
POST OFFICE BOX 2201
WICHITA: KANSAS 67201
OFFICIAL BUSINESSE
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300
Bi
MAGNIFICO
151
BoX
11998.
RECEIVED
GENERAL
p.o-
HER
sePt.
FROm A.M.
8:0°
-p M
SEP 20
1978
Post Office Box: 151
Firestone Station
South Gate, California 90280
ARTHUR G. JONNSON
CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
DiSTRICT OF KANSAS
Wichi tas Kansas
September 20,
1978
Mr. James P. Buchele
United States Attorney
Post Office
Box: 1537
Topeka, Kansas 66601
Dear Mr. Buchele:
I enclose an unopened letter delivered to our office
As which was addressed to "The Federal Grand Jury, United States
F2a Government, Wichita, Kansas."
Viu
Since your office handles grand jury matters inthe
District of Kansas.
Lam forwarding it to you for whatever
attention you deem necessary.
Very truly yours,
ARTHUR G. JOHNSONG CLE
CaroliNe cus
By: Carotyn J. Brown, Deputy
cresaco: sP.0.
Box 151
Firestone Station
South Gate, California 90280
SNOIL HISSESSY NO SALINHOO
127278 ASOOH ST
81. 6W 01 100 8151
09A15078
WW 55p23.
DocId: 32264272 Pagé-3i
POST
ZRL80RRO)
SAILERERO
AA COLA
---
## Page 4
FEDERAL GRAND JURY INUESTIGATION
WARNING
Offo
NoTE
UNDER FEDERAL
LAW THERE: IS
IN STATUTE OF
LIMOTATOONOF
V CONSPIRACY
TIME FOR
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
PROSECUTION OF
NATIONAL PERSONNEL RECORDS CENTUR
CONSPIRACY
TANTANY PINE ONNEL RECCRDOI
ALL POINTS BULLETIN C
political kidnaping with
intended murder
RAINST CLARENCE M. KELLEY,
INVESTIGATION AND THOSE CO-COUSPIRATORS
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
AND ALREADY
ATTEMPTED MURDER
WARNING TO WROMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN:
OF GENERAL
ANE CHARGED WITH. UIOLANTONS
KELLEY AND CO-CONSPIRATORS
(CONSPIRACY): 1201 (KIDNAPING),
MAGNIFICO
1001 (FRAUD AND FALSE
201 (BRIBERY & GRAFT),
STATEMENTS),
CATIONS),
2311 (STOLEN PROPERTY),
2510 (WIRE INTERCEPTION & INTERCEPTION OF
111 (ASSAULT),
ORAL COMMUNI-
BURGLARY),
2231 (SEARCHES & SEIZURES),
2111 (ROBBERY &
FEMALE COMMAMDINE
2071 (RECORDS & REPORTS),
1751 (PRESIDENTIAL ASSAISINATIONS, KIDNAPING & ASSAULT),
1901 (PUBLIC OFFICERS & EMPLOVEES),
GENERAL U.S,M.
1621 (PERJURY),
SINCE
- 1-19x1
1541 (PASSPORTS & VISAS),
1501 (OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE)
ALSO
1111 (HOMICIDE ),
1361 (MALICIOUS MISCHIRE),
1341 (MAIL
871 (EXTORTION
rMaur..
641 (EMBEZZLEMENT & TIETY),
SI THREATS),
791 (ESPIONAGE & CENSORSHIP).
351 CONGRESSIONAL ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPING
591 (PECTIONS & POLISICAL ACTIVITIES),
& ASSAULT)
ETC.
U.S. SECRET -5-1938
SERVICE
TO: ALL
JUDGES,
TO SALI
JUSTICES AND ALL, COUNTS EMPLOYEES EVERYWHERE:
EMPLOYEBS OY EUTH HOUSES OF
UNITED
Trouser
STATES CONGRESS:
THE INTERNATIONAL
TO: ALL
ALL
SHERIPPS,
ALL LAN ENPORCING OFFICERS
TO: ALI
& AGENCIPS EVERSTIERE:
ALL POST. OFFICES
& POSTAL
ALL EMPLOYEES OF ALL MOTOR
DEPY3
SERVICE:
DIRELTOR OF THE
IN ALL STATES:
DOCTORS, PSYCHIATRISTS.
EMPLOVEES OF DOCTORS
AND BOSPITALS:
FEDERAL BUREAU
CHIEFS OF. POLICE
unher park
U.s.
ATTORNEYS,
ALTD
ALL
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS:
101
EMPLOYEES OF ALL FEDERAL,
U.S. HARJIALS ABID EVERY STATES APPOINEY GENERAL:
0F
STATE,
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL
SING-20 APRIL
In GATes
COUrt'g:
MAYORS,
CITY
COUNCILS AND
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION,
TEZIR EMPLOYEES,
ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES,
AIRLINES,
BUS LINES
RESTAURANTS,
MArNeTS,
FERCHANDISE STORES,
AIRPORT EMPLOYEES,
FIRE
SUPERIOR COURNe.
MUNICIPAL
Counts,
DEPTS:, POST OFFICES,
APPRALS COURTS
THE
nur drur
COURTS
CoUnT OF
THE UNITSD STATIC.
ALL
SOPHEME
CITY
HOSPITALS,
SHERIFF'S PACILITIES.
COUNCILS, PRISONS,
POLICE
NAVY ESTABLISHMENTS, AUTOYOBILE
FACILITIES,
MILITARY
JAILS,
INSURANCE. COMPANIES,
BROKERS,
TRUMANNE
DIESELITY ADE DUSTINEN
WAKWING 11
STAYS GRISEN ENLI AND U.5. REAVENS DE SUSPICE 20 KTOMAP PEMALE
MERA MAGNIFICO,
THE DEPUTY PRESIDINT
7717100&
INTERLATIONAL, DIRECILL OR ME
TEN MORE MARTEE CORNS BYECT
IS BICH 1241 CONNE STA
24/28514 Veg
ACT OURVICE BACK
„NAL PLOY TO KIOSAF
GPRETAL
116/100,
M. KELLEY i
CONSPIRATORS (SSE
NIC DOVESTIC DIRECTOR OF TE P.B.I.
MACHTYICO IS LAMME SPCAN-INADED BY CLAPLUCE
BACK OF PAGE)
FOR AND WITH CERTAIN IRONY 6OU
CRIMINAILY THE
BX USING ILLEGALLY AND UNLAUFULLY AND
FACILITIES AID PERSONALL, OF THE FEDERAL
ANU AL 119
FIELD OFFICES.
BUREAU OP
INVESTIRATION
IE. ATTORNEX GENERAL
AND
CLARIUEL ME NELLEY IS NON UNDER INVESTIGATIO BY
TALIVES.
THE UNIZAD ACADES PALATE A62 U.S.
HOUSE OF RETENORE
38 BOY SON 1043
DAXE AFTER
NON THE ISSUANCE 86S0S ARN BINOR
ISSUANCE
1977,
THE KIDDING FLOT IS
MAGERICO ON ERA AIRLIKES FROM LOS PESTLED AR WILL AIRFORT
VRACE UPON TIE ARRIVAI, O2 GENERAL
AT 201O p.M.
A RIGGED.
In 8T.
LOUIS, DO..
PLANTED
AUTO PROM
BREN RENTED AT ST.
THIr. NATIONAL
CAR ReNTAI.
LOUIS,
MISSOURIANNACH IS
TAKE. GENERAL
AGINCY HAS -
PROF, THE AIRFORT TO THE
MAGNIPICO AWAY
WHERE
"BY ACCIDENT" AFTER BEING DRUGGED.
SHE. IS TO BE KIDNAPED AND LATER KILLED
THE AREA WHERE
THE
TAKE PLACE
CRINE •IS PLANNED TO
AND FIVERY PERSON INVOLVED
IS A CLOSELY GUARDED SECTAT BY THE ATTORNEY GERERAL OF THE U.S.
CONSPIRACY
WHO ARE
IS BEING CLOSELY WATCHED BY F.B.I.
GO OVER THE HEAD OF
WORKING DIRECTLY UNDER THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND ARE ORDERED TO
CLARENCE
KELLEY AND THOSE IN HIS OFFICE.
TO. ALL
CONCERNED:
GENERAL PLENIPICO 1S A
DUIX AND IS VITAL, TO THE DEFENSE OP 214Z UNITED
MOPICER ON ACTIVE
STATES. SHE CANNOT DE REPLACED.
HIS IS A FINAL WARNING FOR ALL CONSPTRATONS NUCLULD 10 CHASE AND DESTST
WINK OR SUITER IN CONSAQUENCKS AS RYALED MOVE TN TV. VARIE.
10 AID AND ABST CLARENCE
ALL CHARGES NAMED HEREIN 70 BE PLACED
FELLEY AND HIS CORSAENRAXORS APY PURTHER HILL CAUSE
THI& WAINING IN THIS CONSTRACY; IS NADE
NON GIN:
CLARENCE Mi.
KELLEY
NICHOLAS P.I CATTAMAN. •
TOMAS Ji
JENKINS:
JAMES B. ADAMS
EUGENT W."WAI,SH
'DECKER"
INNALD WI MOORE.
: JR.
McDERMOTT
RICHARD J. GALLACHER.
RICHARD H.
ASH
narone w.
BASSETT
RAYMOND WANNALI
JAY COCHRAN
JOHN A. MINTZ
HERSERT E.
wMV.
CLEVELAND
#M M.
MOONEY
Monk.
MARSHALL
WM
C. SULLIVAN
THOMAS
E. BISHOP
CC SHART
CASPER
AYAN W
WASON G. CAMPBELL
ROBT RUSS FRANCK
MARK FELT"
JAMES H. GALE:
ALEX ROSEN
CHAS D. BRENHAN
LEONARD M. WALTERS
FLETCHER D. THOHPSON
HELEN GANDY
1Adr49r
EDWARD SO MILLER
BRIGGS S.
RICHARD J.
BAKER
THOMAS J. JENKINS
WESLEY GRAPP
SOCIAL SECURITY
#OF GENERAL MAGNIFICO IS
JEK Act 6 (3)
SHEr WAS
BORNIN UNION
COUNTY
KENTUCKY ON SUNDAY, JULY 4,
1920
NAMES OF THOSE UNDER.
THE UNITED
INVESTIGATION BY SIS ATTORY CLAPRAI
STATES GRIPPIN BELL & HE CONCREAS Or U.B.
RICHARD
DOKALD W. GRANT,
COUTH, JERROLE S. OLTVER.
JUDGE
ALLEN MILLER,
JOHN SHERMAN COOPER, THRUSTUS
-DR.
HAMME. TS.
MORTOn,
BERLINER,
DR.
CORE. OR DOROFITY
2412.5.
DOCTORS O? WESTWOOD PRIVATE PSYCHIATRIC HOLITAL
PROTEM JOAN
BARRINGTON, IN. LA. "JUDGE LEOPOLDO SANCHEZ, JUDY
CARNEY-DR.
Un.-
SE IMOOR
POLLACE.
RONALD MARIMAN, DR. SKERDLA, SHEN
ROOF,
DR. AL,VIN DAVIS. HARVEY MCKPE, DUZOIN
MAMIE EISENHOWER:
WILFRED ROOT, WALDA ROUP KOENBRE, GERALD REPOND,
BETTY PORD LADY BIRD JOHNSON. JACKIE
KENNEDY ONASSIS, MARGARET TRUMAN DANIELS. PAT DIXONEYOHN!
MITCHELL. H.R: HALDMAN, JOHN CARLICHMAN:
CHARLES OULSON,
PAMILY.
MARLOVE & SONS JOHN, GENE, JAMES & MARK V. HARTING
DENEY:, ROY H..
LAVINIA(ARS. TOY
STILL, DONALD DAWSON, JAMES STRUART, ATTY. CHASIS, LEADSI
STILL) 707
NW.
55923
DocId: 32264272
Page
---
## Page 5
CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
POST OFFICE BOX 2201
WICHITA. KANSAS 67201
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300
MAGNITICO
15'
1918
RECeIVED
GENERAL
P.o.
HER
SEPT. 22,
FROM
8:00
A.
PM
SEP 20
1978
P307404AK
UNTHE STAT
Post Office Box 15i
Firestone Station
South Gate, California 90280
ARTHUR G. JOHNSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
DISTRICT. OF KANSAS
Wichita, Kansas
NOTE:
September 20, 1978
REGARDING CONSPIRACY AIDNAPING WITH ATTEMPTED
AND INTENDED MURDER OR
GENERAL M. MAGNIFICO,
FEMALE FEDERAL OFFICER
ON DUTY.
SEE BACK OF PAGE
Mre James P. Buchele
United States Attorney
Post Office Box 1537
Topeka, Kansas 66601
Dear Mr. Buchele:
I enclose an unopened letter delivered to our office
which was addressed to
"The Federal Grand Jury, United States
Government, Wichita, Kansas."
Since your office handles grand jury matters in the
District of Kansas, I am forwarding it to you for whatever
attention you deem necessary.
Very truly yours,
ARTHUR G. JOHNSON, CLERK
Carolin
roun
By: Carolyn J. Brown, Deputy
CC:
P.0. Box 151 -
Firestone Station
South Gate, California 90280
TEL# OF GENERHE MAGNiFICO IS
2/3
569-8067
3177 LIBERTY BLUA
SOUTH GATE CALIR
NW 55923
•DocId: 32264272
Page
--- |
||||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10066-10253.pdf | 104-10066-10253 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 11/28/1978 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | SLANK | OPERATIONAL INFO | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK11 : F6 : 20031216-1025936 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10066-10253
02/37/
ADV LA 1735Z
SECRET
PRECEDENCE
FRP: 020
STAFF
ACTION: C/LA-8 (735)
INFO: ODPD-DO VRO FILE DO-HO CICIA, C/EPS/EG 2
C/OG/DMS, C/PES, C/POS/LOO, CAPCSAPGLA OLGA
(25/W)
78 1625449
TOR!
PAGE 001
2816394
NOV 78
IN 1625449
129187
SECRET 2816327 NOV 78 STAFF
CITE
29167
TO: PRIORITY DIRECTOR.
WNINTEL RYBAT SLANK
REFS:
A.
- B
C
D.
DIRECTOR
DIRECTOR
_ 266967
28716
28719
333233
PACHANKIS ADVISES THAT HE MAS NEITHER SEEN NOR HEARD
FROM SLANK-I (SO1) SINCE EVENTS OF REFS B AND CO
PER PARA 2O REF DO PACHANKIS WILL CHECK WITH SOME OF
MIS CONTACTS RE WHEREABOUTS OF SOL. WILL ADVISE RESULTS SOONEST.
3. FILE: 20107496510 EZ IMPDET
END
OF
MESSAGE
SECRET
95646
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10120-10379.pdf | 104-10120-10379 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 2/9/61 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CHIEF, SR DIVISION | ACTING DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | BASIC PROPOSAL TO COVER FIELD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL (REDSKIN AGENT CANDIDATES. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK43 : F24A : 1994.03.31.17:40:27:840028 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10120-10379
DAD.
tal
9746.
294S0TИ
ATUETTIEHT
2. Board laborne, terry Clos
Ronna 2032 R Dad 141n
doting trutor of Sorty
1 Formans tarbal 1aes Daises
#90682
clareres la soda to 14o tonorantan In tro Depray
chiat, ca ariston for Me Mief, Contrl Cony Foy, Cle
on the 108115 106 35
0: 33/20-
As sall la noted, to nouri gose cascuared in th
refereed 11ma10a5 lebruace
merpended tut arter 1t has been veteriest that te sure
ador sins perchologist os as as lore bees creati
arested ta the long fu in alteratins at cog
sagueted bat ids smescat be socospliobed ky jone
cista roppescat themsins und be broceris badimhored sa:
true man sith the
I0700476
506e this agesego
It would also area, that thia entressies sens
Tention coes l rat
- *
C"$
1S/:3
KUHNK§/ewd (2-8-61)
CLOSED PREVIOUSLY
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-10264-10203.pdf | 124-10264-10203 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | 00/00/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 62-116395-713 THRU 724 | null | HQ | 3/12/18 | Review PDF 62-HQ-116395 652 thru 724 pages: 33-34 | null | ## Page 1
124-10264-10203
Assistant Actorney General subl
Crininal Division
Attention: lit, Paul loucher
Director, FDI 62-116395-
September 4g 1975
1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
1 - MI. W. O. Gregar
1 - Mr. J, P. Lee
MAIL, INTERCEPT PROGRANS
Felorence is made to your monoranda of July 22
and August 13, 1975, and to our menorandus of August 20, 1975.
This vill' confiri the fact that on Auguat 22,
1975, Ix, Paul Loucher of your Division reviewad docunenta
In possession of the Federal bureau of Investigation.
Headquarters (FBIHQ) pertaining to the nail intercept
progradl
NI. Boucher was furnished vich copies of
appropriate docuents fron that file.
A revlaw has been comploted of documents in the
possession of FBIll concerning two prograns of mail inter
ception operated by the Ill. In accordance with your
requests these documents are nor available for review.
It is requested that you contact Special Agent Janes I. Lee
on extension 4562 at IBIHQ to arrange for a review of these
Digit
ORIGINAL. FINED IY
105-288406
- 62-116395 (Senstudy 75)
MiLieng
(7)
"LLINFORMAT"": CONTAINED
:.12D EXCEPT.
WHERE SHOWN DIMERWISE.
DUPLICATE YELLOW
SEE NOTE PAGE TWO
1:00.00
ADIY SPQALM/PN
DECLASSIFY ON: 25X
MDR-16
NOONE I
570CT 1
1975
---
## Page 2
Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division
Re: Mail Intercept Programs
SECRET
NOTE:
The Griminal Division has requested all memoranda,
records, letters and othet correspondence from 1951 to date
which the FBI had received or generated with respect to its
participation by the i'Bl in mail intercept programs.
the letter
of 8/13/75 from
the Criminal Division also asked for all infor-
mation relative to the inception, implementation, justification,
and highest level of authorization for institution of any mil
Intercept (opening) programs either independently or with the
assistance or approval of the Postal Service or any other
Federal agency fron the period 1940 to present.
That letter
requested that we advise ir. Edward Fenig or Ronald Malone,
Division
attorneys, when this information is available. This
notification is being furnished by letter to the attention of
Mr. Paul Boucher since he is the Departmental attorney vho
received information on the Project Hunter program and is the
individual interested in obtaining inforuation concerning our
progran.
The information referred to in this letter concers ..
the San Survey and Gus Survay and ve still have six more
progzamscabout which to lurnish infornation
to the Departuent
2
--- |
|||||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32324522.pdf | 124-90029-10014 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | 1/4/54 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 100-405298-NR | USA | 1 | ARMY | 02/25/2018 | EXCERPT; | 1 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
6/8/2015
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER:
124-90029-10014
RECORD SERIES: HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
100-405298-NR
Released under the John
?. Kennedy
Issassination Records
Collection Aet. of 1992
144 USc 2107 Note!.
Case# :WH 45907 Date:
04-11-2018
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: ARMY
FROM:
USA
TO :
TITLE :
DATE: 01/04/1954
PAGES:
SUBJECTS :
THOMAS PEASNER
THOMAS R. PEASNER
DOCUMENT TYPE :
CLASSIFICATION:
PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS :
3
CURRENT STATUS :
Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 08/20/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF USA
COMMENTS:
EXCERPT;
v9.1
HH 45907
DocId: 32324522
Page 1
---
## Page 2
CONFO
ENTIN
SECURITY INFORMATION
EXCERPT
Enu
NAME
RANK
ASN
DOSSIER. No.
ARMY AREA
JEK Act 6(3).
Sgt.
during an interrogation on
31 August 1953, stated
that
(hearsay) studied Conmunism
prior to his capture.
voluntarily made recordings for which
he was paid with Chinese money.
Sceiven +
ALL FBI INFORNAMIONU
CONTRUNED
PATE /1-15-94/y
MAC /KSR
JFK)
405588
DECLASSIFIED BY HRMY
Des i 4.: 21-98
100
SLOPKER
8-4.98
(JFK)
CAR LE, D0F2
JAM 1 $ 1957
CONFIDENTIAL
SECURITY IMFORMATION
HH 45907
DooId: 32324522
Page 2
--- |
||||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10172-10155.pdf | 104-10172-10155 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 06/20/1962 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | INFORMATION REPORT INCREASE OF SABOTAGE IN CUBA. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-8 : F20 : 20040302-1052731 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10172-10155
KNFORMA
TIOt
REPORT. INFOrM ON. REPORT
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
COUNTRY
SUBJECT
Cuba
Inorease of Sabotage in Cuba
S-E-C-R-E-T
NOFORN /CONTINUED CONTADS.
REPORT NO. C5-3/5246,4621
DATE DISTR.
20 June 1962
NO. PAGES
1
REFERENCES
RD
DATE OF
INFO.
PLACE &
DATE ACQ
Hid May 1962
England, London
( June 1962)
T141S 18
UNEVALUATED
FELD REPORT NO.
INFORHATION
SOURCE GRADINOS ARE DEPINITIYE APPRAISAL OF CONTENT IS TENTATIVE
SOURCE
from "a rogular source, quoting Jovan Mirio,
sorTesponden: in Cuba of TANJO, IugosleY press agenoy.
Appratsal of Content: 3e
Tho militla is no longer regarded by the Cuban Goverment as a sorious
faotor in internal or external defense.
Instead, it 18 used as a recruiting
ground for the Armed Foroes, which are now thoroughly professional and
well-trained.
2. Armed clashes between opposition groups and goverment forces have occurred
In several provinoes, Inaluding Matanzas,. Canaguey, and PInar del AlO.
3. There has been a notable increase in sabotage since February or March 1962.
Buildings and fastories have been blown up or burned, cane fiolds set on
fire, and above all, passive reistance has grown in certain industries,
espoolally the sugar refining industry. A different pattern of sabotage
has emerged. Instead of setting off explosive or incendiary bombs ihare
they night cause loss of life or injury, thus arousing popular resentment
against the opposition, targets are chosen for the maximum financtal damage
or dislocation.
S-E-C-R-E-T
NOEORY/CONTINUED CONTROL
LEINSA
1I 100
stea
020
STATE F I /ARHY
I NAVY
FOPCINCLANT CINCARIB #
(Moros Moshtagon dutribution indicated by "1", Pall distriberton by "$=)
18L DIA IX FBI
INFORMATION REPORT
12/L5
LEHR
1/ TEA THE
2/ JFW/SI
1s/6
164/ EXEC
2 TEN/MAD:
IS DIAR
2/ W1/GA/PROP
2, 1M/PACY
LE/R
1INPA-PI2D:21
POrALE DISSEN SEC 1, IE 2, CI 2, FI 3, lE 3 (2),
IN 1 (1), kH 4 (1).
INCORMATION REPORT
0F1-32,015
NO PROJECT (SMOTH)
CS-3/511,421
DOORDINATING RELEASIN
61a1800 C
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10218-10106.pdf | 104-10218-10106 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 01/01/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | LICOOKY-1 PRQ PART II (ILLEGIBLE) | 7 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-53 : F20 : 1998.05.28.12:32:12:513082 : WHITE BANDED AS ILLEGIBLE, (NBR ) | 7 | ## Page 1
104-10218-10106
ThI»
iy.
part
lacoble
Thores cop
Dada
Fill
for item, use
8. CRYPTONTA
SECRET
PRO NO.
PERSONAL RECORD QUESTIONNAIRE
PART 11 - OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
DISPATCH AO.
INSYRUCTIONS TO CASE OFFICER
offaero of appropriato authorily or tha bases of lAe
DOSE AFAIDABlO IN.
on approval unloss requester
approval say
furnishes
be obtained
OrRUOTE
complyine
MARA RhO ap.
128
and 12d.
Therealer sho
usual nothos
document or
€aM.
FR
subject's hondarisine, al possibled and too 68) com.
TIMED.
in 800 13) ropies
number.
urete
"NA.
8f additional space repuired
PSEUDONYM
SECTION
CONTACT AND DEVELOPMEMT
INDICATE HON. WHER, EMERE, ANY, AND BY ANCH SUBJECT NAS FIRST CONTACTED OR DEVELOPED.
I 814199700
INDICATE METHER
SUBJECT GOLIO DE TURNSO OVER QUICKLY AND IN A SECURE MANNED TO DUE REISDASIBLE CASE DEFICER SOP
HANDLING.
INDICATE
nowhow.
....
:?!=
111090.uü
+ 59.80010
clini.
.....
"weater:
LIST OTHER CASE OFFICERS
DEEN KNOON.
.!?.
181d
WHO MAVE HANDLED SUQJECT OR ANON ME ANONS OR MAS I VOWN, GIVE NAMES BE ANICH THEY HAVE
...:
chron 2:
12"0
that?
11ia"
11 6271606 dete doi
trase the recest, to car headlar de
3131.
ised
F0Rм 1050a
3-99
T6-208 :
SECRET
Mislaint needle
---
## Page 2
1d-0d0d
SECRET
SECTION 1
MOTIYATION AND CONTPOL
1. ESTIMATE SUBJECT-S MOTIVATION, (BO detallod, of ponsablo cito exidence. Do eat ude siock cosmont auch do
Gontunada.
INDICATE
WHAT CONTAOL. IF ANY.
EXISTS OVER THE SUBJECT. (Al nO
of reol control
SECTION
COVER
1. COVER USED BY SUBJECT AND CASE OFFICER IN THEIR MEETINGS.
2. COVER USED BY SUBJECT IN OBTAINING HIS INFORMATION AND IN CONTACTING HIS INFORMANIS.
INDICATE SERVICE
FOR
#MICH
SUBJECT THINKS NE (Will orky (ls auriend).
SECTION IV
INTELLIGENCE CORNECTIONS AND TRAINING
EXPLAIA SUBJECT'S KOONN PAST OR PRESENT CONNECTION "ITH
ANY OTHEA INTELLIGEACE SERVICE, INUILAIF THE EXTENT
SUCH CONNECTION IS KNOWN OVERTLY.
EXPLAIN ANY TRAINING SUBJECT HAS HAD IN CLANDESTINE OPERATIONS.
!!!"
trig
SECTION V
COLLABORATION POTENTIAL
INDICATE OTHER
FOREIGE POMER SUBJECT ADULO BE MOST LIKELY TO COLLABORATE
WITH
BECAUSE OF HIS BOLDLOGY
OR PAST
ASSOCIATIONS.
EXPLAIN.
:::;"
it
coolestle: c
it contrad. 00! 10.
202.00
fire tan
Grind.
SECRET
---
## Page 3
14-00000
:
ContInued
Section II. 1.
2. She undoubtedly 18 patriotic but disaprees stronaly with certain PBERNE policies.
3. She 15, at the tire being at least, almost completely dependent on the KUEARs
salary paid her.
san.......
Lest i de is holleris"
stad titin in sinterine
---
## Page 4
• .
SECRET
SECTION'
OPERATIONAL
USE
CONTACT
1F SUBJECT MAS DIES USED DE CONTACIED GEFORE, INDICATE ACTIVITY IN MUICH HE DAS ENGAGED ASD TAI HYPE DE IPUSSH-
MATION
•..*
INDICATE HOE
AND FRON ANDS SUBJECT OBTAINS INFORMATION.
S. INDICATE ANAT HAS BEEN TOLD SUBJECT AS TO INE DISPOSITION OF INFORMATION ME FURNISHES.
• "*
;.:":?
DETAIL SUBJICTOS PROPOSED FI OR CI TYPE USE OR DUTIES.
3. DITATE SUBJECT•S FOSPOST
:2.:.:..1
UST OR BUTTES
SECTION VII
PROPOSED LIAISON OR OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY
DETAIL SUBJECT'S PASPOSED LIAISO TIRE SDITAÇI DR SREPATIOSAL USE .
A. "HERE SUBJECI IS AN OFFICIAL MEMBER OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT:
"I'd
• 10÷903.1"
B. WHERE SUBJECT IS AN OFFICIAL MEMBER OF AN ODOKE AGENCY:
iting. in:
SECTION VIII
AGENCY RELATIONSHIP WITH SUBJECT
RELATIONSHIO WITH SUBJECTS DOE, TRAINEE, OPPOSITE NUMBER, RENUVERATION. OF ANT: AGENCY
PERSONNEL ANONA TO SUBJECT.
3i00 Cerebio
"rar
curle Ma ceraline Borgotly
serviceig
Is paid 40a 250.00 Perchiv;
-90 1395970071011119991
catcher
For ter
For
3
SECRET
---
## Page 5
SECRET
SECTION 1X
QUALIFICATIONS FOR OTHER DREPATIONS
INDICATE SPECIAL GRILITIES, PALENTS, OR QUALIFICATIONS POSSESSED DO SUBJECE ANICH COULO CONCELUGEL. BE OF MALEE
OTHER OPERATIJAS.
112?
SECTION X
COMMI THEA TS
IF
IS PROPOSED
SPAr
COUMODITILS.
INDICATE TAL DEERLY AMOUNT, IF PAYMENT 1O DE MADE IN IREN
SUASIDY OR OTHER METHOD, SPECIFY AND GIVE DETAILS.
Cubject
025.911
corridies, solelies or
1?X.21d
irts
2.
OTHERMISE NOY COVERED MEREIO, MADE TO SUBJECT, (EXARDIE. COUMAIMONIS
famely.)
1. te:?
-this
!:!"
• About
21."
1:31;
1IC
^1'
ieet.macin
::
!??'
srir
nitri, "it
•.294-
SECTION XI
CE AND SECURITY
LODICATE THE FIELO AGENCIES AND GIELD FILES MITH OMICH SUBJECS-S NAME HAS BEEN CHECKED AND THE IS.
model
LICENTO -
AOTEATE OTHER TSESTTSATIVE MEASURES TAREY TO VEDIFY BIOGRAPMIERE
INtORMATION FURLISHED BY
p::=00°1
encoraint
1722300106 162. 01'22
Paring: Not
INDICATE
WHETHER T9 45T
PAOTTASHAL
APPROVAL OR OFENGTIOLAL AP.
PROVAL FOR SUBJECT'S USE HAS BEEN PREPIOUSLY OBTAIDED.
DATE APPADIAL DOTAIRED
EVALUATE SUBJECTES CORDACIEN, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY, CITING EVIDENCE MIERE POSSIBLE.
;.2?121:
-..a on "casion/ineolo deal snint or vier,
or isaacs
2.
camill
load not
G.
55:7182:
c: aocuri
5.:0»
malaria:
11s
125790
rainie,
ribera she d0:211.r:
EXPLAIN
ANY SITUATION
OR
INDISCRETIDR IN AMICH SUBJECY MAY HAVE BEES INVOLVED AMICH MUST BE EVALUATEO ERJOR A
CE/OPERATIONAL
SECURITT VIEWPOINT.
is ludlocaica not imom croade do catciuerars con ba cited ióri, 15a cas
cost ace wen in moct dale the latter as in tadeo,
le not feecordt:" to her) ear
munna, dreact 30012222 1nd cita 0690ra
SECTION KII
SUBJECT'S PERSONAL MADITS
1. USE OF LIQUOR. DRUGS:
GAMBLING, PARANOURS.
unect irnia socially, biù is not tolleved to sink excesaivel. Eradar, d'e 13
no loliered to coe druno of' ony tina, exceed for reiteinal curredes and iderán.
incited anitations.
orally, che
Ful not ie grainst it: didna, but sais are ies
not trile, Maranour have toen covend elsartare in this for.
SECRET
---
## Page 6
Section XI, 5.
30
Securitys The has proven to be reasoratly security conselous, hounver, her
Intirate relationship with Ll'iLlCil,
and rossible with others
constitute potential security intards.
The 13 descreet in her phone conversations
with the case officer, md in the rectanies of miin. reetlas.
She sonetimes tures
down necting places surcasted by the case officer, savinr that some of her
noquaintances visit the place or the area surrested, or that coulet and/or Satellite
personnel are believed to visit the piace or era.
The (reatest potential securits
hazard, the polter belleves, is the type of situation, nesual and/or erotional
Involverent, which she wirht allow herselr to becore involved in.
Section XI, 6e
2. In an effort to pavo the say for Illudis retum to lexico, she lia
Incereedad :1th various lexican Coverarent of cials, and caused certain
she orridec
copies of letter written, and received lucm LILUCk, clipidem from the press,
and suraries of her conversations with ledcan Covement personnel.
---
## Page 7
SECRET
SECTION RElI
AVOCATIONAL INTERESTS
S• IADICATE SUBJECT-S HOBBIES OR INTEREST IN SPORTS, MUSIC. ETC.
shock desca. 23990212169
1101: 50191t
SECTICE
XIV
GENERAL
DEA COUNTRE DE SCROS OTHER NEARE SOUNT ES ALA OMER CHAMACTERISTICS, ARE SUCH AS ME CONLO PASS AS A NATIVE
OE A COUMYRY ON AF104 OTHER
sect late to presidal doerence, do could parall not post do trateee
cition contri
INDICATE WHETHER IUFCRUATION
1& PRO PARTS I AND
CORDESPONDENCE OR OTHER MEANS.
,..i
it taint!
on tra dr for colon cottad.tar 1
wrest tin"
#AS OBTAINED BY RESEARCH, CLANDESTINE
ASSESSMENT.
1ti1s
11902 1o20 Ted
FILES.
..:}1
/ORER YAN POUTINS SCION IS PEQUIRED, IF AND NHER TERMINATION OF SUBJECT IS ERECTED, OLGASE EXPLANA: (A1D0
sapra)
he gates matten doude ar
SECTION XY
DHERGENCY CORDITIONS
RECCH TACT
ARRAHGEMENTS
GIVE FULL DETAILS I.E, RECOGNITION SIGNALS, S'#:
COIN COYTACT BE MADE:
MARINE CONTACT USES
^.?:.
in: 3
t09tot1s
ix.
Do cataster sa 1212
101 "1re Dua care hes cean tira 60 ter Cor tire Coroa
coricor code te uner.
t!5
ДИАТ ДОДА ГАРЕСТСОУКО
101H: CHE:
31 T-1,
SECTION XVI
MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONAL
DATA AND REMARKS
100101110 Comtoced Protestio Mith Catal de112
cluele to concirbances,
÷318
DO 2511:5
in ircicine coontial cittalio.
Cádiso mice te rosicite and revon tich
Pois
Che aho:0d decialtaid not de diven ang more infortion con
for vor to averanlia: he tasion arained tor.
atised ales bore, due pericero selectie to condie sould do rature, 290 ecarteners
in6 8.636 105
be youncer than site
It 1o colora that a axerienced concle care
secur peter aprocinate ad could co to valia de nes letter, tian a rate coco
DATE
10 CrANe 1163
5
SECRET
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10192-10062.pdf | 104-10192-10062 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 07/27/1960 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | MASH | CABLE RE: RE PARA 1 AND 2 REF: AMPALM-5 SAID BOATS DO EXIST, BELIEVE | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-27 : F5 : 1998.04.10.18:07:35:030115 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10192-10062
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
CLASS SIED MESSAGE
"ATE
TO
FioM
ACTION:
270 JL 6O
DIRECTOR
CAL
pa,
51
ML 23 0938? 60
1. 76-
CЭP, C03, A033/4, S/6 2
Wit DIV NOTIFIEO 2110 27M160)
PRIORITY
IN 30269
PARTY DIR MURA CIES MASH 9236
2UET
SEE REVA 5:25(11: 901) *
1O 8E PIRA 1 IND Z 8EF: AMPAL:-S SAID BOATS DO EXIST, BELIEVES
NÃO CUSA WAS SEVERAL AVAILASLE. COES NOT KNOW NAMES BOATS BUT
SAID TIS LEGATED COJIMARO AMPALM-S SUGGESTED WIECHA CONTACT SEGUNDO
AGRANDA CAD CUESTION HEN PE EOATS UMICH ME CAMPALM-S) MAS DEFINITE
LATCH VECHING FOR TABIR EXISTENCE.
REFUs 3 ACT: ROCORDENS AlPALI-S TiDE COMPLYCUG WITH BENDER
AGGRET TO CUP2LY153 MEY FOR MILET TRINING.
*STATED IN PIST STA HAS BEEN OFFERED UNKNOWN NUMBER OF BOATS, BUT
1-2:
Cales 00..,
ELATS MAVE DEN EITHER SUNK, SOLD OR CONFISCATED.
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-10279-10020.pdf | 124-10279-10020 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 08/30/1967 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | CR 109-12-221-1792 | CIA | 2 | CIA | HQ | 3/12/18 | null | ## Page 1
124-10279-10020
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
5/7/2015
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER: 124-10279-10020
RECORD SERIES:
HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
CR 109-12-221-1792
Document Information
ORIGINATOR:
FROM:
TO :
TITLE :
CIA
CIA
DATE: 08/30/1967
PAGES:
2
SUBJECTS :
EGD, CLASH, RIVAL FACTIONS, COPRA GROWERS UNION,
ACAPULCO
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Confidential
RESTRICTIONS:
CURRENT STATUS: Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 04/30/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF CIA
COMMENTS :
v9.1.
HH 50953
DocId: 32301685
Page 1
---
## Page 2
*ROUTINE
CEN
RAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Intelhgence Information C. le
1N- 41475
STATE/INR
DIA
FBI
NMCC/MC
( SECDEF
JCS
ARMY
NAVY
AIR)
CIA/NMCC
NIC
USIA
NSA
"ONE
PAGE 1'OF 2 PAGES
OCR
5D0
AID
ORR
DCS
CGS
This material contains information sflecting
Becs. 793. and
794,
the transmisson
revelation
he National Defense of the United States within the mering one to taws, tate lo, u.s.e
i which in any manner
GROUP I
Excuded from outematie
downpreding and
declorifeation
NO FOREIGN DISSEM
THIS IS AN INFORMATION REPORT. NOT FINALLY EVALUATED INTELLIGENCE.
CITE TDCS -314/13013-67
C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L
300659Z
REC 18
DIST
,30 AUGUST 1967
Matters
COUNTRY:
MEXICO
DOI:
AUGUST 1967
SUBJECI: (ARREST OF FEDERAL DEPUTY CESAR DEL
INGE
ENTE SA
FOR AGIIATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN GUERRERO
ACQ:
SOURCE:
MEXICO, MEXICO CITY (29 AUGUST 1967) FIELD REPORT
NO. HMM- 11,295
HIS REPORTING
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR,
RELEASE OF CTANINFORMAT
IN THIS DOCUMENTAS SANITIZ
GMA BIANA
KP 1-14-98
HAS BEEN RELIABLE
:.SINCE EARLY 1966.J
ALL FBI INFORMATION CONTAINED
ATE 2-18-9531.5608510 KSK
THE ROLE OF FEDERAL DEPUTY FROM THE
12-
779
STATE OF VERACRUZ, CESAREER ANGEL FUENTES, IN
THE CLASH BE-
TWEEN RIVAL FACTIONS OF THE COPRA GROWERS' UNISH IN ACAPULCO,
GUERRERO, OVER THE WEEKEND OF 19-20 AUGUSI T967 , RESULTING
IN THE DEAIH OF ABOUT THIRTY PERSONS AND THE WOUNDING OF ABOUT
ONE HUNDRED, HAS BEEN WIDELY PUBLICIZED IN THE MEXICAN PRESS.
THERE HAS BEEN SPECULATION THAT HE WOULD BE ARRESTED, BUT FOR
07 Adop
•HIS CONGRESSIONAL IMMUNITY. HIS IMMUNITY, HOWEVER, EXPIRES
оди в
• SEP 111987
C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L NO FOREIGN DISSEM (09-02-ZE?
NH 50953 DocId: 32301685 Page 2
---
## Page 3
279-10020
Auc 31 11 45 AM °67
C-O-N-F-1-D-E-N-F-4LASQN SENO FOREIGN DISSEM
IN-41475
TDCS - 314/13013-67
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
(classification)
-(dissemi controls.
WITH HIS TERM ON I SEPTEMBER. >
2.
ON 28 AUGUST 1967, AGENTS OF THE MINISTRY OF GOVERN-
MENT (GOBERNACION) ARRESTED FEDERAL DEPUTY CESAR DEL ANGEL AS
HE WAS LEAVING THE HOME OF ELENASGARRO DESPAZ, LEFTIST MEXICAN
PLAYWRIGHT. HE IS BEING INTERROGATED ABOUT HIS ROLE IN THE
"ACAPULCO MURDERS."
petites
3.
FIELD DISSEM: STATE ARMY NAVY AIR FBI CINCSO
REPORT CLASS: CONFIDENTIAL NO FOREIGN DISSEM
C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L
Laser
NH 50953
DocId: 32301685 Page 3
--- |
|||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10065-10401.pdf | 104-10065-10401 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 4/12/78 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CARPENTIER, PATRICK/OLC | WARREN, RAYMOND A./C/LA DIV | DISPATCHES TO AND FROM MEXICO FOR PERIOD 15 OCTOBER THRU 26 NOV 1963. | 3 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK11 : F11 : 1993.07.14.16:21:03:680340 : ROUTING SHEET IS PAGE 1 OF DOCUMENT. | 3 | ## Page 1
104-10065-10401
J: UNCLASSIFIED
L
INTERNAL
SE ONLY
CONFIDENTIAL
ROUTING AND. RECORD SH
SECRET
'SUBJECT: (Optionol)
OLG RECORD COPY
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO.
Rodger S.
Affabri165 KM '78
OLC/CER
1133
DATE
13 April 1978
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
INITIALS
COMMENTS (Number. each comment lo show from whom
to whom.
Draw a line across column after each comment.)
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
1.
'i done!
MI.
Shepanek
0/SA/D0/0 Tube:
Harold Leap,
HSCA staff,
DX6-Green
wants the name ofl
for the years 1957
and 1958 to close the l00p
on his inquiry as to whether
had any
relationship with Oswald
Kim File HSCA
when he was in Japan.
ted.
Gabrielson
10
1t
3:
The
for the years 1991.
1958 was.
Mr. Joke Baker.
Me. Baker died
nü 1964.
Masant
12.
13
14.
15.
FORM
3-62
610 USE PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
SECRET
CONFIDENTIAL
INTERNAL
USE ONLY
# 06532
UNCLASSIFIED
---
## Page 2
14-00000
12 APR 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Mr. Patrick Carpentier
Office of Legislative Counsel
VIA
FROM
SUBJECT
SA/D0/0
:
Raymond A. Warren
Chief, Latin America Division
Dispatches to and from Mexico for period
15 October through 26 November 1963
REFERENCE
HSCA Request of 9 March 1978
Attached are copies of 407 dispatches covering the
period 14 October through 29 November 1963. to and from
Headquarters.and the Mexico City Station and Monterrey Base.
These dispatches are bioken down as follows:
No. Dispatches
221
120
55
11
From
Mexico City
Hqs
Monterrey
Hqs
To
Symbol
Hqs
HMMA
Mexico City • HMMW
Hqs
HMY A
Monterrey
HMYW
2.
These dispatches contain sensitive operational and
privileged information.
Accordingly, the review of these
documents must be done under strict security controlled
conditions.
Any notes taken from these documents by the HSCA
reviewer(s) must cite dispatch and paragraph number; otherwise
it will be impossible to conduct the necessary note
review
and will preclude the release of the notes to the HSCA.
3. No copies of these dispatches are to be made and
the attached dispatches are to be returned to this Division
these dispatches
immediately following the HSCA review.
siezed
Raymond d. Tasren
Raymond A. Warren
Attachments:
407 dispatches
a/s
THAt: 10:16
AND WHO 1104D
SEREST
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 9560
# 06533
---
## Page 3
14-00000
OLGELA
SUBJECT:
Dispatches to and from Mexico
for period 15 October
through 26 November 1963
DDO/C/LA/STB/WSturbitts:esm (X9127) (12 Apr 78)
Distribution:
Orig - Addressee w/att
1 - SA/DO/0 w/o att
- C/LA w/o att
1
- C/ LA/ST.B
2
300R2T
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10177-10023.pdf | 104-10177-10023 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 08/29/1959 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | FBI | CIA | FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS OF DOMINIC BARTONE. | 2 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK64-13 : F12 : 1998.02.26.17:24:56:390102 : | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10177-10023
LASSIER MESSAG
ROUTING
WITARI
2056
DATE.
38 AUGEST 1858
10.
YEDER'I ERRAO OF IMISTINITICH
PROM, DIRECTOR COMTRAL ISTELLTORACI AGENCY
come, Vort 51
no. 61, C1/ 0P3, 51, S/6?
LOEFEURIO
As 29
1946:59
OBIT
OPEHARONAS
Tota
TO
00190983
909:3
CITE CER
NOPORI /OQNYINUED COITIOL
THON:
• Fixara, SARAH 0287) 16-7
DATI OP IIO 26-28 AUOUST 1959
SUBJECT: 1 TOLICIAL PRANSAGTILNS OF DOSINICA BARTONE
*TUÁN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
LO' REPELSICS IS XUDE SO OUR OUS-POBL TO JOUR BUREAU, LATTE 27 AUGUSS 195%,
WHICH REPORTED THAT DONUTE BARTONE ALSO RETORTED AS BETO, MAD SETT A LANTER
TO PARAMA LITT A LARDS ANCONT OF CUSE TO OPTI A GARLATTO ACCOUTE DI TRI PARAMA
CITY BRAIGH OF THE NATIONAL CITY BATK AND TRAY THEJS JUDS MY DE CCTNTID WITH
MILITAN ALCANDER MOROAR, AMERICAN CITIZEY NO LAS BUEY BADADED IT REVOLITTONART
AGTIVITIRS IN CURA, RISINCE AIRO IS LUDE TO TOVE ANORAMUN DATSO 5 ATUST 1958,
YOUR FILS FUGIE 105-70973, CONCERTTHO MORIA DID BARTONE.
2O OU 88 AUGUST 1959 A FAINLI REZIABLE SOUNCE REPRISED TILT TEN PERONE MORON
BUTTONE SENT TO PARAMA SO OMEN SRI ACCOVIT WAS ONE NIRE PSALIALS, LAN PARTIER ON
CREDORI PASTLES, ALDRESS 2720 TIRSI RATIONAL DUI SULLUDIO, HIAT, TORIDA, PRALIAS
NAS CARTIONO A POTLE ON $70,000, OF MICÙ $15, 000 MIRE IS 1, 000 DOLLE IRiS. AB
PRINT TO OPET AN ACCQUIT IN THE HAS OF SERVICIOS DITIOLACIONS Sado, HITH PIS
OTET AUTHORIIÃO SIONITURE ON CRICKS TO BI THAT OF DOMINSE BARTONE. SUB SARA
REPRUESSPLATIVSS IN PAYAMA ARE ARIAS, PAERERA UD PADRIA. TIES PIKH IS KRADED
0018++
REFFOOUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMITED
Cop 12
ZIBR
---
## Page 2
CLASSIFED MESSAGE
ALTREO
10
PIOM. DIRECTOR JO
CONER
ANO.
1DE91AEI0
I BOUTINA
PRIORITY
OPERAIIONA
LALLEDIAN
7:r 90933
INFO
CITE DIR
IL HAPSODIO ARIAS SALICE, HIFI SEVERAL PARTIERS, INCLUDINO ARTASO SON, OILERS,
NID CARLOS AROSHOA ABORRODL NAS RUDI PIACINO OONSIDIRABIE PRISSURE ON IN
BUITO MARITI ANONIE AGIVE BUT 1S DE 20 MI MEN FARE ME MET NOCENTEE
JO THE SOVACE OS TRIS DIPORTATI # IS SEISITIVE AND CARE SIOULD BE DUECISA
IE DIVEZOFISO LELDS ON THIS KATTEA,
(BAD OF MESS403)
21-7
ADOTE DITO RARIO OTTO PACTITES, IN 29282.
interno oeriere.-ii
B &C RET
ICEHLOCHLIACONE
REPROOUCTION AT OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMIBITED.
aMericarine oreisse
Copa!
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32289108.pdf | 124-10200-10384 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 05/25/1967 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 105-165503-25 | DIRECTOR, FBI | LEG, MX | 8 | FBI | HQ | 3/1/18 | INC MEMO, NOTE | 8 | ## Page 1
JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY:
FBI
RECORD_NUMBER:
124-10200-10384
RECORD_ SERIES:
HO
AGENCY FILE_NUMBER: 105-165503-25
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM:
LEG. MX
TO: DIRECTOR. FBI
TITLE:
DATE: 05/25/1967
PAGES: 8
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
ORIGINAL
CLASSIFICATION:
REVIEW DATE:
STATUS
PAPER. TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
Secret
03/16/1998
Redact
NEW
CLASSIFICATION:
UPDATE DATE:
RESTRICTIONS:
JFK Act 6 (4)
COMMENTS:
INC MEMO, NOTE
DocId: 32289108
Page 1
---
## Page 2
09
also
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINAD
HERCIN IS UNCLASSIFIED
EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN
OTHERWISE
on
Cont
ential
SECRET
Mr •
J. Walter Yeagley
Assistant Attorney General
4-12-94
Director, FBI
Declassily on: QAD& JF
FRANK ANGELO TOTIN, and others
REPONTED PLANS TO BLOW UP CUBAN SHIP
IN MEXICAN PORT,
POSSIBLY VERACRUZ
INTERNAL SECURITY - CUBA
NEUTRALITY HATTERS - CUBA
-
1
Nic.
Mr.
May 31, 1967
Wannall
Nasca
CLASSIFIED: AND
REASON
FCIM, IV
DATE OF h
DECLASSIFILATION
TON
5/33/92
Reference is made to our previous communications
in the captioned matter, particularly to our communication
dated way 19, 1967, which transmitted a number of photographs
depicting ca
recovery of the buried explosives by Mexican
authorities.
on way 45, 1900, our representative in Mexico fur-
nished the following intormatione
Declassi
The explosives recovered from the burial place in the
State of Tamaulipas, Mexico, are in the custody of the Mexican
Army in Mexico City.
The possibility of having the explosives
presented at a trial within the United States together with
competent witness from the Direccion Federal de Seguridad
Federal Security Police
or the Army has been proposed
1967
to the lexican Government.
MAILED 9
MAY
COMM-FBI
On May 25, 1967, Fernando Gutierrez Barrios, Director
of the DES,
and Rafael Hernandez Ochos, Under Secretary of
Goverment (Interior), advised that no decision has been
reached as the matter
is very sensitive politically.
There
is a feeling that the DES should not be compromised
in this
matter even though they are anxious to see the subjects
prosécuted.
While it might be possible for Mexican Army
AGENCIES
Cas
demolition experts to testify;
this also poses political
problems which require further thought.
Our representative noted that
the final decisione
In this matter may rest with the presidency. f(U)
APPROPRIATE
AND FIED
Tolson
This is for your information and you will
be lept
DeLoach -
advised
Mobr
of developments.
Wick
Casper
Callahan
REC. 52
Classtied by 304
Conrad
Felt
105-165503
25 /us
Exempt/stom GDS Categony
Gale
2
- Miami
Rosen
2
Sullivan
- Mexico City
Tavel
Trotter
Foreign
Tele. Room
Holmes
J LAN Us 1967
Liaison Unit
for
Gandy
(10NL ROOML
TELETYPE UNITL
MAIL ROOM I
(Route Through
Review)
105-16550329
• Coo!1
antial
SELE NOTE TPAGE TWO
UHN
DocId: 32289108
Page 2
DATA
---
## Page 3
4-3 TReV. 1=27-669
DECODED COPY
ential
xxX CABLEGRAM
$ RADIO
SECRET
TELETYPE
Tolson
DeLoach
Mohi -
Wick -
Casper
Callahan
Conrad
Felt
Sulli
Tave
Trotter
Tele.' Room
Holmes
Gandy
O AIRGRAM
STATE 04
URGENT 50625-67
TO DIRECTOR (105-965503)
FROM LEGAT MEXICO CITY NO. 289
APPRO
AND FIFIT
ADVIDED
AGENeTE accified
AES
Exemat from
TING
Date of Declas
204
Indefinate
1+81
ALI, INFORMATION CONTAINED
HERRIM
IS UNCLASSIFIED
2x22
WABRE SHOWN
OTHERWISE
CLASSIFIED AN
EXTENDED B
REASON
BION
FCIM, II, &
DATE OF REV
FOR
DECLASSIFICATION..
5| 35192(7
INTERNAL SECURITY
FRANK ANGELS
Cha
QRINI, AKA; ET ALO
• CUBA,
Mac rude
Declassiy
Q0:
PAIR
Classified
REBUAIRTEL
MAY 9 LAST.
Declassify
gn: GADR 6,
18,3
THIS OFFICE HAS DETERMINED THAT EXPLOSIVES RECOVERED:
FROM BURIAL PLACE IN STATE OF TAMAULIPAS, MEXICO, ARE IN THE
CUSTODY OF THE MEXICAN ARMY AT MEXICO CITY THE POSSIBILITY
OF HAVING THE EXPLOSIVES PRESENTED AT A TRIAL WITHIN THE
UNITED STATES TOGETHER WITH À COMPETENT WITNESS FROM THE
DIRECCION FEDERAL DE SEGURIDAD (DES - FEDERAL SECURITY POLICE)
THE ARMY HAS BEEN PROPOSED TO THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT.
DFS,
AND RAFAEL HERNANDEZ OCHOA, UNDERSEGRETARY OF GOVERIMEN
ON MAY 25 INSTANT, FERNANDA GUTIERRE ZAARIOS, ORECTOR
(INTERIOR) ADVISED THAT NO DECISION HAS BEEN REACHED AS THE
"RICES
MATTER IS VERY SENSITIVE POLITICALLY. THERE IS A FEELING
THAT THE DES SHOULD NOT BE COMPROMISED IN THIS MAITER EVEN
and rape!:
ICEMAN M
REG. 52
#o: 60 5729168
105-0
MR DELOACH FOR THE DIRECTOR
11 JUN
1967
If the intelligence contained in the above message is to be disseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be suitably
paraphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems.
Coz
SECRET
DATE
-25
DocId: 32289108 Page 3
---
## Page 4
1-3° (ev. 1-27-66)
= AIRGRAM
DECODED COPY
Confidential
SECRET
Xx CABLEGRAM
RADIO
TELETYPE
PAGE 2 FROM LEGAT MEXICO CITY NO. 289
THOUGH THEY ARE ANXIOUS TO SEE SUBJECTS PROSECUTED. WHILE IT
MIGHT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE MEXICAN ARMY DEMOLITION EXPERTS TO
TESTIFY, THIS ALSO POSES POLITICAL PROBLEMS THAT REQUIRE
FURTHER THOUGHT.
THIS OFFICE IS OF THE OPINION THE FINAL DECISION
IN THIS
MATTER MAY REST WITH PRESIDENCY. DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE
FOLLOWED CLOSELY AND BUREAU KEPT ADVISED.
44)
Tolson
DeLoach
Mohr —
Wick
Casper
Callahan -
Conrad -
Felt -
Gale -
Roser -
Sullivan
Tavel -
Trotter
Tele. Room
Holmes:
Gandy
RECEIVED: 9:48 PM JRL
CC- MR SULLIVAN
"':
3RD CC MR. BRENNAN
Confidestial
105-165503-25
f the intelligence contained in the above message is to be disseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be suitabl
araphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems
SECRET
DocId: 32289108 Page 4
---
## Page 5
4-3
Kev. 1127-98)
3
DECODED COPY
Conf jential
SECRET
• AIRGRAM
XXX CABLEGRAM, MIT, RADIO
TELETYPE
STATE 044
412:14506 kee
Classinted
URGENT 5025-67
Declassity on:
OAUT
TO DIRECTOR (105-165503)
FROM/LEGAT MEXICO CITY NO. 289
Tolson.
De Loach .
Mohi —
Wick —
Casper
Callahan
Conrad
Felt -
Gale -
Rosen
Sullivan
Tavel
Trotter
Tele. Room
Holmes
Gandy
DE gorone
Напп
Classified D
Declassify on: OAR 6/15/63
FRANK ANGELO FIORINI, AKAS ET AL. IS • CURASSED ARUBA
Se/29
EXTENDED
1 1 70177 10
REASON
FCIM, 71,
REBUAIRTEL MAY 9 LAST.
DATE OF RONIC
FOR
THIS OFFICE HAS DETERMINED THAT EXPLOFFLESS RECOVERED
5125192
FROM BURIAL PLACE IN STATE OF TAMAULIPAS, MEXICO, ARE IN THE
CUSTODY OF THE MEXICAN ARMY AT MEXICO CITY. THE POSSIBILITY
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED
EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN
OTHERWISE
OF HAVING THE EXPLOSIVES PRESENTED AT A TRIAL WITHIN THE
UNITED STATES (TOGETHER WITH A COMPETENT WITNESS FROM THE
DIRECCION FEDERAL DE SEGURIDAD (DFS • FEDERAL SECURITY POLICE)
OR THE ARMY HAS BEEN PROPOSED TO THE MEXICAN GOVERNWENT.
ON MAY: 25 INSTANT, FERNANDO GUTIERREZ BARRIOS, DIRECTORS
DFS, AND RAFAEL HERNANDEZ OCHOA, UNDERSECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT
(INTERIOR) ADVISED THAT NO DECISION MAS BEEN REACHED AS THE
MATTER IS VERY SENSITIVE POLITICALLY.
THERE IS
AFFEELING E
THAT THE DFS SHOULD NOT BE COMPROMISED IN THIS
BET REVER (S
MATTER EVEN
Let I6 AM
gragley
1 ra
- 11)111
SEROPRTATE AdENCIES
2040
IVE FIELDOFTACES
VAN:
5/31/61
Classified
Exempt from
GDS Category, I
ADVISED BY
Date of Declas
rication Indefinate
00TING
SLIP(S) OF
DATE
to by Mi
If the intelligence contained in the above message is to be de?lemibated outside the Bureau, it is
suggested that it be suitably
paraphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems
Core ent 1a1 SECRET
105-16550-3-25
DocId: 32289108 Page 5
---
## Page 6
Ionfidential
DECODED COP YSECRET
• AIRGRAM
XX CABLEGRAM
RADIO
_ TELETYPE
PAGE 2 FROM LEGAT MEXICO CITY NO
289
THOUGH THEY ARE ANXIOUS TO SEE SUBJECTS PROSECUTED. WHILE IT
MIGHT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE MEXICAN ARMY DEMOLITION EXPERTS TO
TESTIFY, THIS ALSO POSES POLITICAL PROBLEMS THAT REQUIRE
FURTHER THOUGHT. (C)
THIS OFFICE IS OF THE OPINION THE FINAL DECISION IN THIS
MATTER MAY REST WITH PRESIDENCY DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE
FOLLOWED CLOSELY AND BUREAU KEPT ADVISED:
Tolson.
De Loach
Mohi -
Wick -
Casper
Callahan
Conrad
Felt -
Gale -
Rosen
Sultel:
Tav:
Trottsh
Tele...oom
Holmed
Gandy
RECEIVED: 9:48 PM JRL
ORIG: MR. DELOACH FOR DIRECTOR
LEFELADE OMIL
BRD CC: MR. BRENNAN
HEARINED
I the intelligence contained in the above message is to be dieseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be suitabl
araphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems
Considential SECRETS 105-165503-25
DocId: 32289108 Page 6
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10140-10422.pdf | 104-10140-10422 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 5/2/77 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | JOURNAL: OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL MONDAY - 2 MAY 1977--HSCA GUIDELINES | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK53 : F6 : 1993.08.04.17:09:20:250058 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10140-10422
Cre INFERNAL USE UNLY
Journal - Office of Iogislative Counsel
Monday - 2 May 1977
COMBER NA!
5-26
HSCA
77-0007126
suideline.
Page 6
24. (Confidential - DEM) LIAISON Called Bill Milleï, Staff
Director, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and set up a meeting
for him with @ric Isenstead®C/CCS, at 1l:00 a.rn. on 3 April to discuss
a story regarding Agency cover placements which may appear shortly
in the Chicago Sun Times.
I also asked Miller if there was any remaining assistance the
Agency could provide on the matter of a briefcase temporarily lost by
one member of the Committee staff and Miller said he thought not.
25. (Confidential - DEM) LIAISON Received a call from Stan
Taylor, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staff, who referenced
one answer provided by the. Agency to the supplemental questions
submitted by the Committee regarding Agency activities in Micronesia.
Taylor thought that the documents referenced in this answer might help
in convincing the Committee to delete the most offensive sentence in the
interim report. I promised to bring the materials to Taylor the following
morning.
26. (Unclassified - GLC) LIAISON Steve Fallis, House Select
Committee on Assassinations staff, called in follow-up of his callin
Friday concerning yeeritelearatesand related matters. I told him
that Mr. Doug Cummins would be in touch with him today, after he
has talked with our Security people.
27. (Confidential - GLC) LIAISON Called Sam Hoskinson,
National Security Council staff, to check on the President's contacts
with the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on the Micronesia
statement. He confirmed that the President had talked with
Chairman Daniel Inouye (D., Hawaii) on Friday afternoon and the
Chairman had indicated that the Committee would hold off any action
on the statement until Chairman Inouye returned to Washington and the
Committee meets on Tuesday. At that time, the matter will be brought
before the full Committee again. Hoskinson said the President was also
considering calling Senator Gary Hart (D., Colo.) on the matter.
18941
96.4
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10218-10046.pdf | 104-10218-10046 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 01/01/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | (ASSET) SUPPORT | 16 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-53 : F22 : 1998.04.30.14:33:12:373082 : 16 PAGES NOT BELIEVED RELEVANT (NBR) | 16 | ## Page 1
104-10218-10046
HOUSE SELECT COMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS STAFF NEW:ES
FILE TITLE /NIER/VOL: KDACETUNE (LIHUFF) (1 Vol)
Support
50-134-18/3
INCLUSIVE DATES: A Apí 1963 - 28 Oct 1921
CUSTODIAL. UNIT/LOCATIOY:
POs: 2011
DELETIONS, IF'AVY:
None
TATE
TATT
RECEIVED RETURNED
REVIEWED BY
(PRINT NATE
SUGNATURE OF
REVIEWING CFFICIA!.
NOT REVIEWED BY HSCA
FOCUNRES MAY BE COrTERRE RIMONED FRON THIS FILI.
SCONT
109d
RETUENT TO RECORDS C
MATERIAL FIRED IN THIS TOLE
IS IN CHRONOLOGICAL, ONL
KDACETONE
50-124-28/2
" LIHUFF SUPPORT
50-124-28/2
---
## Page 2
14-00000
1 11m 171 12 00 1 00.
CONFIDENTIAL
NOTICE
-.-
:
THIS FILE HAS BEEN PROCESSED AND RETIRED. DO NOT
ADD ANY DOCUMENTS TO THIS FOLDER. FORWARD CS
DOCUMENTS THAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THIS FOLDER
TO IP /RPU GE-58.
NOTICE
CONFIDENTIAL
....
foRE 2593
17-13)
......
- А им.
---
## Page 3
14-00000
SECRET
(WHEN FILED DN)
•ROM: (Heodquarters componeni)
WH/1 Mexico
TO
SUBJECT AND PROJECT FILE REQUEST
AND FIELD NOTIFICATION OF ACTION
IP/AN
TO : (Station/Bose)
FROM: (Division)
Chief of Station, Mexico City
Chief, Western Hemisphere Division
INFORMATION FOR REQUESTERS
COMPLETE ITEMS I THROUGH 12.
ITEM 10- ENTER OLD TITLE WHEN AMENDING A TITLE, CITE
ANY FILES, SUCH AS 201 OR PROJECT FILES THAT ARE RE.
ITEM 3 ALL FILE
TITLES MUST BE STERILE SINCE THEY WILL
APPEAR ON THE FIELD COPIES AND ON MACHINE LISTS
LATED TO THE FILE COVERED BY THIS REQUEST ITEM 1O MAY
ALSO BE USED TO GIVE REASONS FOR THE ACTION BEING RE•
ITEM E- ALL REMARKS MUST BE STERILE.
QUESTED. TO IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF MATERIAL TO BE PLACED
IN A FILE OR TO MAKE OTHER EXPLANATORY REMARKS
ITEM 7 AND B-USE FIRST THREE LETTERS OF DISPATCH SYM.
STATIONS
AND LIST HEADQUARTERS ELE-
ITEM 11 - A RECORDS OFFICER MUST SIGN ALL FILE ACTION RE•
MENTS ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED NUMERIC CODES
QUESTS CONSULT YOUR RHO ON ANY PROBLEMS THAT ARISE.
INFORMATION CONCERNING FILE
TYPE OF FILE
•QUE IFILE NUMBE
COUNTRY NUMBER
ATEGORY NUMBE
SUBJECT
PROJECT
50
124
ISPECIFIC SURJECT NUMBER
28/2
3. FILE TITLE (SPECIFIC SUBJECT) (PROJECTS LIMITED TO 15 SPACES!
KDACETONE
ANALYSIS ACTION
OPEN FILE
X CLOSE FILE INDICATE DISPOSITIONI
AMEND FILE TITLE
GEOPEN
6. REMARKS (FOR FIELD DISTRIBUTION)
ACTION REQUIRED
5.
RETAIN
DISPOSITION
TDESTRUCTION RECOMMENDED
THRU DATE!
7. INTERESTED STATIONS (PROJECTS ONLY,
TE INTERESTED HEADOUARTERS DESK LIST ACTION DESK FIRSTI
HMM
50
9.
FILES ACTION
[CHARGE PERMANENTLY TO
OFFICER & DESKI
10L0 B
CS FILE
RESTRICTED
UNRESTRICTED
REPARE FOLDER AN
END TO REQUESTE
T0. COMMENTS INCLUDE SPECIAL HEADQUARTERS ROUTING INSTRUCTIONSI
ENDORSEMENT
FrECTIVE DATE
28 ocl 71
FORM
82-83
DESOLETE PREVIOUS
812
G. 2-€
12.
•CORDINATION
50
SECRET
CODE
124
....
RIO APPROVAL
REQUEST APPROVED BY
38 |
28/2
I-S COPY
---
## Page 4
.S-E-C=R-E-T.
DATE CE CRYPTONIM CHANGE - 2ÖSO4171
KDACETONE
FORMER CRYPTÖVIM - LIHUFF
CRYPTONY! CHANGE AUTHORIZED BY
COMPONENT - RID/AN
IRO OR RID SECTION CHIEFI
- GiDLE OR DOCLHENT REFERENCE (FROM ITEM IO OF FORM 8121
=_HUMS=7138
N-D-T-I-C-E
......
THIS IS AN RID NOTICE CF A CHANGE IN FILE
•____ TITLE CRYPTONYM CAUSEO BY COMPROMISE. IT
.. .. ..... ...
IS TO BE PLACED
IN THE FILE INDICATED AND
TO REMAIN THEREIN'ÄS" A PERMANENT DRTICINL
CS RECORD.
. S-E-C-R-E-T
FILE IN - 050-124-028102
---
## Page 5
SECHET
Ciricia Station, 'axico cite
%
NO PICIO BANDID
ONLY DUANED LISK
CAN FUSA BEELING
CHief. NOGANE
SUBTLET
LINUFF /1.
Social Security Benefits
REFS:
i.
ICT 10, 210
B. Dook Dispalch 6900, 11 :larcn 1969
I'mile undar contract to UNLitiCE from 1958 to February, 1970, LINUFF/1
accurulated mino croditable quartors unir the Social Socurity f. dinistration (SSA)
accuculated under trus nano but have not get been trans-
ferred to S5A.
Ona quarter crodited under alias is already posted in the SSa.por
With Station approval, Heducuarters intonds to transfer the cignt quarters
accumulated under true nara to so and have sieutarcously the one duarter dictalias
merged into the true nade account trough the intercession of a cleard 55A contact.
tolue would be identified as Lilure/l's a ployer for all nine quarters,
SSA account will not sion any uklaice interest or conncction.
The advantane of
this procodure is that efter all creditable servico and contributions nove been
recorded in SeA, LIlUFF/l can correspond directly with ssi on any questions lie may have
as to ino arounts ne is entitled
jKLAiCE will ba cut out excuse if LItUFF/T
siould nave any quastions on the arount of credit he earned during his UNLANCE service.
In this case, he rould hava to contact tie Station for forvarding nis questions to
Head uartors and resolution with appropriate SSA contacts.
2. Following Station action is therefore required:
a. Hocity lisadquarters that no objection exists to the transfer
Caslinclin para l above;
b. Brief LilFs/l Chat
his SSA credits are being transferred to SSA for
ricording bu: that their posting nay take as long
six ronths boccuse of routine posting backlog in SSA;
(2) he should therafore not expect a consolidation of all of his
SSA credits until
about the cad of calendar ycar 1970
and should rot begin correspondence with SSA until
(3) sinca dia had carned SSi credits prior to his
UNLACE, his epouse should ta made duare of his/and/or her
general SSa enticlerants without any reference to the
credits accrued curing his UNLANCE service;
(4) after 31 Ducerbar 1970, he ray oddress any questions concera-
ing SSA credito and entitlenchis to:
CROSS RETERENCE TO
DISFAIGI STRESS AND NUMBER
1T: A1.5 - 1413
DATE
(coirt)
15 JUL 1970
HOS FILE HUWEER
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
- CCS/CTS
- WH/FaRSCeN
- WH/1
CPB
COS/DFB
1 - CCS/DFB
GIFILE
CCS/OFB
THE CE SINGOL
CCS/CTS
WH/ REAS
CPD
GRECES: 351
EXT.
COORDIMATING
6804:
CAtE
CATE
13/2/2
53
USE PREVIOUS COITIO'8.
DIORATCH
---
## Page 6
1d-0d0d
DISPATCH
HE1d - 17972
(5)
Social Security Idsinistration
balticore, darylans 21203
Suca corrispondunce rust, of course, dare no ruference to diLf icE.
le should contact the Station if he has iny quaction pertainion t
he SSA credits de earned anile under contract to JiLAiCE
bistribution:
vriy and 1 - COS, lexico City
--..-
GLASSIFICATION
PRECIO
5-99
5.om9
530
USE PREOUS EDITION.
Lovindira
---
## Page 7
DISPATCH
FEUCESSING ACTION
SECRET
MAENED FOR DIDEXTEC
RAR-O.
Chlef of Station.
Chief, kH Division
FROM
Chief of Station. Mexico CIty
SUBECT
MHSPAWN/LIHUFF/Request of Assistance
to Obtain Microfilm Coples of Spanish Documents
ACTION REQUIRED - RIFEKENCLS
DEO INDEXING REONKED
CALY QUALIED DESK
CAN JULGE DIDENING
MICROFILM
Action Required: As Stated
An old and proven contact of COS Mexico, L HUFF, has
requested assistance to obtain for research purposes microfile
coples of the historical Spanish documents contalned in the
"Examen Histórico de la Reforma Constitucional que
Hicleron las Cortes Generales y Extraordinarlas"
(Londres,
1935), by Agustin ARGUELLES.
"Apuntes Sobre el Arreglo de los Vocales de Cortes
o putado...® (Madrid, 1820
Escritos en la Carcel por el
* (Madrid, 1820), by Joaquin Lorenzo VILLANUEVA.
C. "Expediente del Proceso a los Dipurados Presos en
1814 en el Archivo de
las Cortes Españolas."
Archivo
reservado dol Congreso de los Diputados.
Tomo Xil.
Marico City Station would appreclate any assistance the
Station can render to obtain the above mentloned microfilm
coples.
for Willard G. CURTIS
Distributions
2 - cos.
-/WHD
CROSS REFERSICE TO
and ..
CS COPY
DISPATCH SYNAGO, AND NEARER
HMMA -37 154
CASINATiON
SECRET
DATE
15 May 1969
1 50-124-2812
und.
---
## Page 8
1d-0n0d
DISPATCH
dUSTICATIO
SOCIET
PROCESIRE ACTION
MARKED fOR BOXING
NO MOLEING EQUIRCO
OMIT QUIIFED DESK
CAN JUDGE RADERING
MICROFES
FROM
Chief, i Diviadon
Chiof of Station, Mexico City
SUBACT
ADRIA/ JACEUT
LINE - 1901 T0c0T Jar Return
ACTION BLOUIRED - REFRINCES
Aotlon Requirod: FTI
Peference:
Hone
: 04
Porvardad as a separate cover attachant la a troe copy of the 1067
title
U.S. Individual Incoma Tax Heturn for Subjout.
Wi lard 6. Curtle
Attachment: 1987 Ircora Tar Feturn, U.Soto
Distribution:
rigE 1- Chief inal, watt u.S.C
2 - Chief kH Div, W/o att
CROSS REFERSACE 10
DISPATOR STARDI AND MISSER
104X2-0163
GASSAHCATON
SECRET
CUREND - DO 102 SENOVE
DATE
27 tune 1908
MOS FRE NUMBER
50-1-1/8
---
## Page 9
TO
DISPATCH
Chief, Whi Division
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
xx
PROCESSING ACTION
MARXED FOR MISERiNG
BO INDEN SE PEQUIRED
ONLY QUALIFIED DESA
ICAM JUDGE INDEX IN
MICROFILM
FROM
Chief of Station, Mexico City
SUBJECT
Agent Evaluation - LIHUFF/I Of LIHUFF Project
ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES
by millard a cached on coples or a enur luaten written
2. This is forwarded for Headquarters information and
records.
-
Willard C. CURTIS
ittachment:
Agent Evaluation 13 cys
= inter to atsmatic
• 1.21691
Distribution:
3 - C/WH, wlat
CROSS REFERENCE TO
OISPATCH SYUBOL ARO NUMBER
HMMA - 32878
GCLASSIFICATION
SECRET
50-124-28
DATE
LIHUFE/SUP.
29 August 1967
HOS FILE NUMBER
201-30999
---
## Page 10
SECRET
AGENT EVALUATION
24 August 1967
1. Nane (P): LIHUFF/8
2. Project & LIHUFF
3. Overt Job Title: Manager of Large Association.
4. Covert Job Title: Contract Agent.
i Job Description & LIHUFF/l-Is a contract agent who Is
in touch with and reports on a right wing student
organization and Its activitles. He also reports
on a Mexican organization which sponsors the
publication of a right wing economics (monthly)
Journal: he has contact with a sub-agent (LICHANT/
who is employed by both the Ministry of Education
and
the Mexican
Soclal Securlty Institute.
addition, he is able by virtue of his overt
employment, to get Dun and Bradstreet credit and
other checks on
business firms. American,
Mexican and others.
is In contact with other
right wing organizations and Indlviduals and has
lood contacts with Catholic Church authoritles
in MeXiCO.
6. Evaluations
a Performance of Above Duties without Prejudice to
Elther One.
only part-
excellent cover for the work he doas for woract.
bo Attitude towards WOFACT, Cover Organization and
Present Assignment.
LIHUFF/ Is a great admirer of WOFACT. He Is
anx lous
to do any asslanment given him: he ls
grateful for the extra income (although small)
which the WOFACT job gives him.. He Is very
leased with his present assignment, loves workin
or his cover organ zation.
C .
Security and Discretion.
LIHUFF/I has had years of work of the WOFACT
cape i, in chinas has been
Ho did the same type of work during world
assoclated: with WOFACT
under unfeel ever one contrace status
Jand In Mexico.
He Is very security=
consclous and discreet
about his assoclation with
WOFACT and about his work with this organization.
SEGRET
UHUFF/SUP
---
## Page 11
.....
SECRET
do Handling.
LIHUFF/ has presented
no problems to the Station.
le accepts guldance and Instructlons, is anxious te
do whatever Is asked of him. He takes about one
hour weekly to handle.
Thore have been no excessive
administrative demands generated by this agent.
Report Writing.
LIHUFF/I generally submits reports which he has
acquired fron elther LIHUFF/2 or LICHANT/18 0r,
he writes brlef memorande on data he belleves of
Interest.
he makes coples of the dun & Gradstreet
reports or simllar ones he delivers to the Station.
His reporting is good, thorough, but brief and to
the point.
f. Personal Attributes.
tlos in Mexicos he Is very well Ilked and respected
all typest
Mexican Businessmens and he gets along wall with
His family plays no role in his WOFACT
aceivlties.
8. Performance in Mis Specifie Job.
LIHUFF/I porforms woll In his speelfle Job. He
gives the station no probleas, elther administra
tively or otherise. Mis performance could be
rated as Strong.
h. Noteworthy Weaknesses.
This agent has no noteworthy weaknesses. In vie
lo Career Developmental Possibilitles.
This agent could adjust well in any Spanish-
speaking country.
J. Comments Not Covered by Above Headings None.
Signature of Rating Officer
eard (Custo
Tard Go CURTT:
Signature of Revlewing Officer
Arcane Casti
SECRET
1316631
arounds ride
sanitatitan.
---
## Page 12
DISPATCH
CLASS, CATION
_SECRET
Chief. L'OGAlE
aFaL
Chief. VH Division
Chief of Station. Mexico City
SUBJECT
JECENT/LIHUFF/1 - 1966 Tax Return
ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES
Reference:
A.
HHMS-5094,
16 Dec
66
HISMT -5750, 9 Feb 67
BARRED I OR IDEANO
GO INDEXING RECUURED
CELY CURLIFIED LES
CAH JUOGE INDERING
MICROFILN
Forwarded unde
956 (overtly submitted, separatecome fax Retuerax copy of Subject".
2. This is being submitted in response to Reference A.
Willard 6. CURTIS
Attachment:
(u/s/c)
1966 Tax Return
Distribution:
2 - C/WOGATE, w/ate (8 cy)
t'= G/WH, w/o att
6.008000a.33
CROSS REFERENCE TO
DISPATCH SYHOOL AND BUMBER
HMMT- 8008
CLASS,FICATION
SECRET
7751"1|
DATE
22 June 1967 •
ROS FILE NUMBER
«TWO D
---
## Page 13
DISPATCH
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
NFO.
Chlef of Station, Mexico City
FROM
Chief, Wi Division
SUBJECT
O LIFE Studert Substay
ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES
References:
A. WWW 14500,
18 Ajr1l 1966, Paragraph 4
B.
IRSiA 28835, 4 lay 1966, Paragraph 3
с. НУТ 6507, 3 May 1966
HIT 7147, 13 September 1966
B. IMT 7197, 4 October 1966
FPOCESSING ACHIO!
MADRED FOR MIDERIO
INS ROEXISO REQUIRED
ELY QUALIFIED DESE
CID LOGE MEDEXIO
ESCROF ELM
1. In response to Reference A, the Station notified Headquarters
In Reference B that the $500 monthly subsidy to the LIur student
creanization vould cease as of 30 April 1906.
leedguarters believed
chet the Apil subsloy payment reported in Reference o and cherred to
Project LIRANCH vas to be the last payment.
The post recent reneval requests for Projects LIHUFF and LILISP-X do
not contain provicions for this subsidy. Headquarters vas under the
Impression that the subsidy would not be continued and would appre-
Kenneth B. TRABOVT
Distribution:
2 - COS, Mexico City
CROSS REFEREICE TO
&S COPY
RI
Chrono
362
LEST
5025
Foes 53
USE PREVIGUE CONSON
I DISPATCH SYMBOL NEO MUMBER
Eat - 3031
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
OFFICE
WE/1
OFFICE SYMBOL
- =
191 S
OFFICE SYMBOL
OFFICER:
SODATE
TAED
1 из ун.0e
CATE
1201
• DATE
50-134-2812
28 NOV 1955
MOS FIL i Dovember 1966
50-124-28/3
ORIGINATING
TYPIST
[EXT.
3654
COORDINATING
OFFER'S NAISE
RELEASING
---
## Page 14
14-00000
SECRET
6 September 1966
MEMORANDUM POR: Chief, CCS
FROM
SULJECT
:
WH Division
: Project Funding Plan/Pro:ect
LIEUTE (PI)
A. Iuentification of Actlulty
1. Project cryptonya: LIHUrT
2. Approved for: 1 July 1965 - 30 June 1566:
$1, 200
FY 1967 - $4,200
3. Proposed successive flocal your budget: Same
4. Bered utatement os project ains, character and
The purpose of this project is to provide
support to a U. S. Contract Agent who has access
to night-wing political leaders and organizatione
in Mexico.
This agent is handled directly by
a Station Case Officer.
B. Funding Bistory
1. The Contract Agent recelves a monthly Balar,
of $300 plus his opcrational expenses directl
fros the Station Case Officer.
2. Funda have algays been handled in this manner.
-009
them a more i an one go out is
• :
---
## Page 15
1d-0d0d
TO
INFO.
FROM
DISPATCHI
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
PROCESSING ACTION
MARKED FOR INDEXING
Chief, WHD
xX
NO INDEXING REQUIRED
ONLY QUALIFIED DES
AN JUDGE INDEXIN
Chief en station. Mexicacide Afirmacion Revolux maria (FCMAR)
ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES
REFERENCE: HMMA-24542, 20 October 1964
1.
In reference the Station Indicated that unless reference
Identity D
the
succeeded In galning
an
important ministerlal
post in
new Diaz Ordaz government, the beneflts to be derlved from
the Cecil B. ARLISS-reference Identity B contact (l.e.. a
continuing indirect connection with the frente Civico and
Incidentlal information reports) would not be of sufficient
value to warrant continuation of the contact.
To date, as far as the Station is aware, reference
Identity D has not been appointed to any Cabinet
lal position.
Further,
there Is no indication that former
President Aleman Intends to
reactivate the frente Civico into
a movement which would be of MHSPAWN interest at this juncture.
ARLISS has accordingly been instructed to phase out the
contact with
reterence Identity B and the Frente Civico upor
his return from his U.S. trip In January 1965.
Before lois
departure ARLISS gave reference Identity B an advance of 4000
pesos to cover the
two regular monthly payments of 2000 pesos
December 1964 and
proceed to close out the contact as expeditlously as
for
Willard G. CURTIS
Distribution:
• WHD
2 - Files
CROSS REFERENCE 10
1110F5
DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER
H4A-2503
ASSIFICATIO
SECREI
DATE
50-126-112
si tryi
---
## Page 16
14-00000
DISPATCH
CLASSIFICATICN
SECRET
PROCESSING ACTION
MARKED FOR INDEXINO
10
Chief of Station, Mexico City
iNFO.
NO INDEXING REQUIRED
ONLY QUALIFIED DESE
CAN JUDGE INDEXING
FROM
Chief, WH Divigion
MICROFILA
SUBJECT
LIHUFF Projcct
ACTION RFQUIRER - REFERENTES
REF:
DIR 96033
DIR 99160
The level and the scope of authorized charges to LILIßPY
for LIEUFF activities for the balance of FY64 were provided to you
In Ref B.
The Station should adhere rigidly to the limitations on
LIHUFF's salary and the support for student activities.
Should
you wish to support other specific projects under LIHUFF activity
such as the book to be published in Buenos Aires, your
recommendations in this respect will be considered by Headquorters
on a:rage to case basis.
As also Indicated in Ref B, Headquarterg has allocated an
additional $30,000 to Project LILISP-S for FY bringing the total
to $82500.
This additional allotment will have to be documented
and the Station is asked to submit its comments which can be used
in support of it.
3. The Station is also requested to submit to Headquarters,
not later than 1 June 1964.
nn up-dated assessment of the LIHUFF
operation.
If at that time the Station wishes to present a revised
project for fiscal ycar 1965, your recommendations should be
submitted with the reassessment.
If your recommendations are
accepted, Headquarters will then undertake to rewrite the project
outline forwarded with EMA-20931 and submit the Project for
approval.
Oliver G. GALBOND
CROSS REFERENCE TO
Distribution:
0&]-COS,
Mexico City
COPA
DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER
FANY 12379
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
OFFICE
WH/3/Mexico
Postribut Jon: Is
--F-RI
1 Chrono
OFFICE SYMBOL
DATE
50-184-3879
DATE
2 March 1964
HOS FILE NUMBER
50124-28/3
COORDINATING
EXT.
5940
OFFICER'S NASIE
WH3/REX
rea*
53
USE PREVIOUSFDITION
OFFICE SYMSOL
C/WHD
DATE
146:
RELEASING
OFFICERS SIGGUATURE
ICDATCH
indians iden
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10192-10122.pdf | 104-10192-10122 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 04/23/1964 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR FBI | DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR PLANS | MEMORANDUM: SUBJECT - ROBIN MOORE | 1 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK64-27 : F2 : 20040310-1056521 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10192-10122
RETURNTO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
11 TrEBOr
Do D. Duated
J RON
:Deputy Mirector or lane
SUDJECT: BODIE MOORE
Interence la race to your amoratis tated
CubaE" (IMa ROVOlUTIONiTY 'NEtS) (JU?)," Your 8110
IT OILIN
сото Jus.
-08
24
has reported tsat lie totalion
baos of alriya BUllA unro nor aparteral vas ralcod bo
the danaican police.
3.
11l0g of thie
mencY ontaia the inioration chit
BaRIB Lo a
budding
Sa 84550 1024818 y348 006-17008
CaC: 9/781.003
: de
Dintribution:
OrdE.
did rottere
1: 11 ( 103-2-513)
CILIA
1C
108
2645007
79 DIlL 1984
DASIC:
WIRA 330
9 AprIl 1904
XiD
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10109-10249.pdf | 104-10109-10249 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 12/23/1959 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | WITHHELD | DIRECTOR | CABLE RE ARTIME TRAVEL PLANS | 1 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK40 : F7A : 1997.06.28.13:37:51:543031 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10109-10249
ORIG :
UNIT
• EXT
DATE :
TO
FROM:
CONF:
INFO :
#+90-088801
WH/III/CARIBBEAN
3623
23 DECEMBER 1959
MEXICO CITY) 16-3
DIRECTOR
WH 5
C1, CI/OPS, C1/0A,
Os 2,
s/C 2
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE
3
TO
DEFERRED
Ell PRUNING
5 2108.38
6
7: 213
ROUTINE
INITIALS
PRIORITY
INITIALS
OPERATIONAL
IMMEDIATE
47346
CITE DIR
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do NOl Reproduce
[MEXI]213
INFO
HAVA (PRIORITY)
HER: DIR-07506 (007-7655267
1. ARTINE ETA MEXI 1845 MEXI TIME 23 DEC VIA EAL FLIGHT 305.
21-32. WILI ATTENTI OBE IN POON PRADO HOPEL, NÂTE ICE ECSTAGE PET
MEXI]÷811 BEGINING 1400 HOURS 24 DEC. IF UNABIE DIADI ROQI AN PIDO TREE
LEAVE WORD WHERE STAYING AND AVAIT COITACT PER SAS PLAT
(END OF MESSAGE)
WE Conment:
*Ref says is vill aüvise devi when Aitice aM! leon.
WE/III/Mexi
Of/SSD/ucCrew by shone)
COORDINATING OFFICERS
S-I-C-R-L-T
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
31BR
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10100-10334.pdf | 104-10100-10334 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 11/1/63 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | MEXICO CITY | DIRECTOR | TRAVEL AUTHORIZED | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK33 : F6 : 20040108-1032354 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10100-10334
HEDO Cora
16346
TASTEN
102210
CITE CIR
79937
MIKE MOO 6700 (IN 49319)-
Background
Do Not Reproduce
1. FREAPUKE TRAVEL AUREL
TIED WITH STOPOVER NI ORTEARS. PERAPANE
•BLIMAT SITA SENDERMEY TIN ESTO SINA CIONE
2. RIS PARA PARER RIS LAPLANTER CARE OPTICIA AVAILANCE NEI
MRAPAVE CHICAGO ON 19 JAWARY DESCUSS
WAY APPAGICE TLWTER
CHANTIN AND MUTUALES AGNES ON OBJECEIVES.
3• EDS HIT
TEL CET
HE UPON SICKOT SUATECT'S TRAVE
Mational Catholio
0A/D/3 -
WH/CA
rast)
(mare)
holate
1920/3
COOLOMATO ORACLAY
REPRODUCTIONS OTHER TAN THE ISSUING CUICE IS PROHIBITEC
415836
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10234-10000.pdf | 104-10234-10000 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 03/14/1966 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | WITHHELD | 12 MARCH LA REPUBLICA PUBLISHED ARTICLE BY CAZALIS ENTITLED "UNA NACION DE AGENTES DE LA CIA". | 1 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK64-51 : F8 : 1998.05.31.07:47:25:200107 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10234-10000 ₽
'7-
108.95
1610H7
=estãor D sie.
SECRET
•iTi
1 189.
ELE VIE CUES WH 8 CA/AR CA2 EE6
SECRET 141SSUL
DIR FRAN MEXI PARI INFO
#AVE GMNY CITE CARA 3832
TYPIC ANKAISER
REF:
FRAN 1585 SRA &
(N54815) *
1 4la66 71525
12 MARCH LA REPUBLICA PUBLISHED ARTICLE BY CAZALIS ENTITLED "UNA
NACION DE AGENTES DE LA CIA: EL COMANDANTE SORI MARIN, EL COMANDANTE
MORGAN, EL COMANDANTE ORDOQUI Y EL COMANDANTE CUBELA"* AIRMAILING
CLIP DIR MEXI PARI WAVE. POUCHING FRAN
SECRET
CFN 3832 1585 PARA 4 12 LA REPUBLICA CAZALIS UNA NACION DE
AGENTES DE LA CIA EL COMANDANTE SORI MARIN MORGAN ORDOQUI Y EL
CUBELA
BT
#REf CABLE
16665
15
NNNN
Amlack-i
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 180-10112-10466.pdf | 180-10112-10466 | 04/26/2018 | 4/17/2018 | HSCA | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | null | NUMBERED FILES | 3/12/18 | null | ## Page 1
1800-10112-10466°
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
10/13/20
-
AGENCY: HSCA
RECORD NUMBER: 180-10112-10466
RECORD SERIES: NUMBERED FILES
AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 015106
Document Information
ORIGINATOR:
FROM:
TO:
TITLE:
CIA
DATE:
PAGES:
SUBJECTS :
06/25/1976
25
ANTI-CASTRO ACTIVITIES
STURGIS, FRANK, BACKGROUND
CIA, INTELLIGENCE
DOCUMENT TYPE:
NOTES
CLASSIFICATION:
Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS:
3
CURRENT STATUS:
Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 01/01/2003
OPENING CRITERIA:
COMMENTS:
NOTES FROM 6-25-76 - 9/21/77. BOX 296.
wH 30955 DocId: 32264840
Page 1
---
## Page 2
Fonzi
Notes - call from Frank Sturgis 6/25/76
He just ran across a friend of his who used to be an agent, in
communications,
and a he "revived" his mind
on something that
he "completely
had lost
forgot."
He had previously told me that he
almost all his notes from his adventures in the
intelligence business, which explains why he hadn't remembered
this before.
He reminded me he told me that he had been sent to washington
by a group of key men
in Castro's inner circle and told to
give some secret documents and lists of names to Hoover, personally.
(Sturgis didn't tell me this, but Pedro Diaz-Lanz -- the guy who
came out with Sturgis and was head of Castro's Air Force -- told
someone the list contained the
names of Cuban exile double agents.
At the top of the list, says Diaz-Lanz, was Artime's name. )
sturgis
says he never did get to see Hoover but he did see his
personal secretary.
He says he was sent to Hoover directly
because the insiders didn't trust the. American Embassy.
He believes the Rockefeller Commission and the Watergate Commission
has testimony from
his about plots
agamast Castro, but he couldn't
get
an OK to assassinate pa*s Castro because of the Eisenhower
administration.
One of the people that Sturgis says he was in touch with here,
besides *hadia tbe ClA, was
Tarabochia.
He was in touch
with
Tarabbohia at this particular time, and therefore Tarabochia
would know of this incident:
There was a meeting
in Cuba bout two, two and half months
before the Kennedy assassination.
There were a number.of
high-rakking rebel officers present:
Ee Fidel, Raul, Che,
¡the chief of G2 (can't remember his name), a man who
was called
"El Mexicano, "
several other people, a woman...and Jack Ruby.
The meeting was in Havana. One of the rebel officers present was
sa half-brother at of a Cuban exile living in Miami.
After the
JFK assassination, the officer sent a letter to his half brother
telling of the meeting, the discussion to assassinate JFK and
the presence of Jack Ruby. He smuggled the letter out, probably
ithhough Mexico.
The deal was that Castro would supply Ruby with a flow of drugs.
Ruby would
get the money to buy the
drugs by being given the
winning number in the bolito drawing.
That's how Ruby would
be
paid off..
When Cuban exile got letter some ClA agents found out about it, but
"before they
could get it from him,
in Miami
and he turned over the letter to agents from the Miami: FBI
office.
ro to control tre i re
made contact with the FBl here
They advised him that it was a very delicate situation and
not tell anyone about it.
NH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 2
---
## Page 3
2
Sturgis doesn't know name of Cuban exile, but he worked.
in a factory
in. Miami or Hialeah. He's going to try to find out, he's checking
on it now.
The friend he ran into, the guy with the company, was the one who
told him Tarabochia had this information.
the background is this:
Ruby had gone to Cuba many
times and
while he was there he was
trying to get some action
"McWillie was
friend of his, as you know."
(NOTE: In
interview with Canfield in Coup d'fat
sturgis has a tough time
remembering who McWillie is page 243). This is where Ruby
probably thought a up the idea of making a deal with Castro.
"We all know he had criminal connections."
There should be
some record of his trip through the American Embassy in
Mexico City of his trip to cuba through there. "But this could
have been a secret ten trip he went on,
on the other hand, if
he was involved an in an
assassination."
He doesn't know how long after the assassination the Cuban exile
got the letter from his
half-brother. (l/. probably.came
Sturgis: "This
man here like to had
a shit hemorrhage."
(Coincidence?: From Robert Morrow's Betrayal: "Not to be vulgar,"
I thought aloud,
"but he'll have a shit hemorrhage." Morrow
speaking of Castro's reaction to his counterféét operation. d
(1 asked him about Crile's piece in the Wash. Post re the Castro-
Trafficante
relationship)
sturgis says that's news to him. But he doesn't believe it
because Castro kicked out the mob and Lansky and Trafficante
lost their casinos.
told Santos one
day, I said, 'Santos,
I: just ***xa left a meeting with Castro and he ordered me to
close down the casinos for 10 days.".
And he did. Sturgis was
put in charge of casinos for a while by fastro.
Sturgis believes if that was the case, that would make Aleman an
agent for Castro also. But if he did make contact with Trafficante
it was through Rolando Martinez, because he knew Trafficante
very well, he used to work for the Havana Hilton, so he knows
all. ** the mob people, "He knows them as well as l do."
Aleman and Martinez are xaXxa*ia
very close friends.
Barker got fired from the ClA because of his connections with the
racket people.
NH 5095J/ DocId:32264810 Page 3
---
## Page 4
Sturgis - 6/30/76 = tatel
--says: Tarabochia should
remember Castro-Ruby incident because
"I know thellA agent, or former agent, who told him about it.".
-thinks the
woman he mentioned
as being at the meeting was Tanya,
Che's secretary who was
killed witth him
Bolivia..
-also trying to get
name of Cuban exile in Miami who received
the letter
=-his ex-ClA friend
spoke to. Tarabochia. about it at the time and
perhaps
Tarabochia wa should have it on
record.
...it
should alsok be part.of the FBl files
in Washington, along
with the original
letter...
-ClA should have a report in too,
"We sent the report in."
***
--re Cellula Fantasma: (Was that Company operation or Naval
Intelligence operation?,
"No, Company operation." The people
who were involved, in that were Dr. Louis Conte-Aguerra (sp?);
he asked
my assistance and l went to see my CO, who was
Sam Jenis.
Conte-Aguerra was associated with the Company and
they came to me because
they knew
I was about the a only one
who could do successful air operations.
So they asked me
if I would do a series of five
air operations and I said, certainly,
I would...
cre l heard of the relationship ax of Jukio Lobo and his
anti-Castro
activity.
I understand Bill Attwood went down
to interview him and...
"Well, Bill was with the Company.
No, wait a minute, wait
a minute..
Attwood, Attwood...
forget... l think he was
the company... I'm not sure offhand...l didn't know all the agents."
(Wasnit it Rojas in charge of Cellula Fantasma?)
Conte-Aquerra
was the big man on it.
He's the one who arranged for the
financing for the people that I would do the operation for.
As a matter of fact, I went on three of them myself..l couldn't
get the Cubans to do it sol used Americans. One of the pidots
•was Bill Johnson..)
(What was Rojas' role?)
I didn't fool around with. Rojas.
You know,
there was
a movement within ClA which told Conte-Aquerra
that he
was going to be a big official in the new government..
And many of
the agents who were
also
going
to get positions went
along with
the
idea that Conte Aquerra would be the president of the new Cuba.
And
he was
being
financed through
his own ClA contacts to do a
series of these operations
(How does Lobo fit in?)
Well, Julio gave money.
He was working
also with ClA.
money which he was taking off income
tax and so forth.
This was the way what you'd call 'washigg" money.
This is how ClA would wash money through different Cuban business
people--and American businessmen--which wouldn't lead directly
to the ClA. Julio Lobo was one of the people.
NW 50955 DocId: 32264840
Page 1
---
## Page 5
(Were you dealing
with him much?) Well, I worked
with him, but
I wasn't dealing directly with
him because he wasn't connected
with a the s
people 1
was
associated with.
He was
more with
the economic section, you
know, that certain officials dealt with.
(You met him here in Miami or Havana?) In Havana.
But I didn't
have any
& dealings with him because, you know, certain people
worked with certain people. It was the thing
that you call
compartmentation, you know.
They dealt with didferent people in different ways.. Just like
Tony Verona.
He was a ClA agent. He not only was one of the
leaders, he was an agent per se.
And even today Manolo Artime
is still an agent.
He wasn't then but he is today.
He's still
with them.: You know he was the civil coordinator between the
Revolutionary Junta and the Bay of Pigs..:
(mentioned Gerald Shamma and her Artime story) Heh heh bah, she
told you that story, eh. I wish she hadn't told you that
sodry,
heh heh heh.
Artime: "When he came back from Cuba, they made him a businessman,
they
made
him a very wealthy man.
I think he's got a little
problem with Semoza
now,
but he was working closely with him.
**But if you're with
the right people they don't give
a shit
what you did, as long as they control you.
The ClA got some
shits of the world working for them.
The Agency slammed the door on all four of us when we got
out of prison. Colby sent orders out to all stations not
to talk to us or have any contact with us.
But it makes no
**difference to me, if I need to get to them I go through other
people..
But,
hey, that's the
name of the game, I guess.
When you get
into the
big league stuff with the powefaul people up in Washington
or Langley, if the wrong group of people are in control and you're
not in
that league, they can hurt you. And right now the wrong
group is up there.
Have been since Colby's been up there.
Colby's
got his own
people and l'm not one of them."
(Looks like they're getting ready
to hang & Lucien Conein, Well,
you know,
Howard knew him very well.
Evidentally,
he's been
involved
in some things and they don't want to let it come out.
But there's a lot of shit Colby has been involved in and he comes
out smedling like
a rose" Evidentally, he [Conein] is in band bad
with the wrong
people. Colby cleaned
house and
put his own people
in theeean and
what they do is use people for sacrificial lambs...
like they did us in Watergate... to take
the heat off of them..
Howard himself didn't realize that he was used and we in turn
worked with Howard and they buried
all of us..
•HH 50955. DocId: 32264840
Page
---
## Page 6
3
But like I told you before, Bennett
was the man who really did
a number on the President.
(Bennett of Mullens Co.) And though
they
closed house and withdrew
all the agent that were overseas
working
for the & Mullens Co,
they re-opened
a new company
and had to re-do
the
agents with the new company...
l curious to
find out
where Bennett is right now.
(Howard Hughes connection) Oh yeah, they used him.. They let
him make a lot of money:
There's still a lot of places down
here especially that are still ClA fronts...
-remembered also that Castro's G2 at meeting name wasR
Romero Valez...
HH 50955: DocId: 32264840
Page
---
## Page 7
-notes--call from Frank Sturgis 7/28/76 -tatel
-said he wasn' surprised by the Schweiker announcement of
running with
"I think schweiker's using this thing,
but, hey, you can't blame him, he's a politician. The thing
worked out beautifully
he asked: "Is he still
officially investigating the JFK thing?"
I said, yes, he was
still interested. After a few minutes of inconsequential
conversation,
he
asked again: "Hey, let me ask you something.
Are you still
checking up
on the JFK thing?"
I said, yes, l
was.
Then
he said: "I told you about that letter from Cuba,
didn't 1?"
I said we
as had checked up on it and that we had gotten a
Tarabochia about it but the memo said nothing
although it did mention a trip to Cuba by Ruby.
He asked did the report mention about the letter that came
to the relative in Miami, he said his friend
"Salvatore" Ithe
former ClA man] told him definitely there was a ** letter
and that "Bob Dwyer probably was the man [the FBI agent], because:
he was in charge of the Cuban desk at the Bureau downtown, was
probably one of the agents who picked up the letter."
I told him that Tarabochia's memo indicated only that Ruby
went to Cuba, not that he had seen
Castro, and that the FBl
man was
James D'Oonnor, not Dwyer. Sturgis asked how we got
a copy of that memo and I told him I didn't know.
He implied
that perhaps it was changed or censured and I said that was
possible.
for all l knew, because
I had never seen the original.
He then
said that Ruby could have been to Cuba without people
knowing it, of course.
Sturgis then asked me if I o had ever heard of lyle Stuart.
said yes. he's the ax book ax publisher who has published
a lot of sensational and controversial books. "You know he
supposedly met Oswald a month before Kennedy was assassinated
in Miami, accordäng
to a report
There's supposed to be something in the newspapers in 1963 before
Kennedy was killed about Oswald being in Miami, Sturgis said, and
he is going
to the library to check up on that.
Lyle stuartit was also
says sturgis, was head of the Fair Play for Cuba
committee.
reported
he was very pro-Castro and
that Castro was supporting him financially
and that Lyle
Stuart was seen
with and connected with Oswald. And it was
reported in the papers that Oswald
was here a month before
the
assassiaation.
NOw
it may all
be bullshit but l'm still
going to
check
it
out."
sturgis said
the
man
who told him this was a writer who was "pretty
much
involved" in the investigation of the assassination.
He was
last night, and the guy said that lyle Stuart would be the
one to check
with.
The guy's name is Bob Traflins.
"I did ask him& if it would be alright for him to talk with you."
At this time sturgis went to get Trainins phone number and in the
background I could hear the television news which - coincidentally.-
happened
just then to announce the news of Howard Hunt filing the
$2-1/2 million libel suit against Weberman & Canfield.
"Did. you
hear that?" Sturgis asked, just to make sure.
MH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 7
---
## Page 8
2
"What Ellis is doing," said sturgis, "is to file Howard's now
and then by the we end of the week
or next week he's filing
mine.
Both Howard and myself
are
using Ellis. " [Ellis Rubin,
local controversial attorney
is most
known in Miami for his
publicity ploys and long-standing
feud with. State Attorney (Dade. co.)
Richard Gerstein. Sturgis
said the suit dad would be against
the authors and publisher of Coup D'Etat and against Playboy.
and Hefner and later maybe against Dick Gregory ("As soon as
I dig up enough about
him. ":
I said libel suits are tough to
win.
"Yeah, but hey," said Sturgis ISt. George was right: he
says
"but
hey" a loth, even if
we get a judgment for a dollar
it'll stop
all the shit about us
being involved in the the
assassination
of John F. Kennedy."
He asked if I had a chance to.
that
letter.
speak with the Cuban who received
I said no, l haven't had a chance because as a result
of his television appearances Wally. Weston had come forth with
his information and I had been busy on that.
"I spoke to
Wally Weston tonight," said Sturgis, "and I have a meeting to
sit down and find out what he can tell me and so forth."
Back on Oswald's meeting with Lyle Stuart, Sturgis said he
thinks it may have been
possible because there
was a report that
he himself had met Oswald in Miami and that could have been very
possible, what with all the anti-castro people he met and the
double-agents, but he himself didn't
remember it.
But he did
hear
that Stuart was connected with the Fair Play for Cuba
Committee and getting financial assistance from Cuba. "This
Bob Tralins was a
friend of his
and dislikes the man
very much,
but: he definitely told me this."
Switching subjects, I asked him
what he knew about operations
that took place from Cay Sal island.
[the Hughes connection.]
Afl he knew, he said,
that there was
a black Customs official who
tried to keep people off the island because the ClA used it as
a stepping stone,
like
a "listening
post": off the coast of Cuba.
He himself didn't have any operations from there. "On some .of..
the island close by there we stopped by occasionally for several
houss, but I kept away from Cay Sal
by other people, other aroups."
because it was being operated
"They were ClA operations.
C???] Was it Clavor other opegators?
One time Barker got a hold of me because
was doing
something, in some operations with Bill Johnson which
was financing, and Barker got
a hold of me and said, 'Hey, we're
doing something
very
sensitive
that area' and he asked me to
stop
for a while and
go into another area." [Note: This is obviously
conflicting: Who was Sturgis working for if not ClA? Here he became
very deliberately convoluting and
wound up talking about pinar de Rio
operations in Cuba. J
I asked him if he was involved in the training camp in New Orleans
with Gus
DeLabarre and Rudodph Davis: "No," he said
at all. I never knew about any
quickly.
"Not
training camp in Dallas.
New Orleans." ENOTE: WHO SAID ANYTHINO ABOUT DALLAS???' DI
HH. 50955
DocId: 32264840 Page 8
---
## Page 9
3
l asked him
about the guy who was reportedly the head ClA
man
here, Mr. B, or Bender or his supposedly "real" name,
Drescher, and
what he looked like.
"Oh, I don't know," he
said.
mean
I never met him. You've got to understand the
agents
didn't talk to the contract employees, but there would
just be a telephone system of reporting.
The telephones were
connected by relays
so that if the FBl were checking the number
it would be
located
in
one area but it would just be a relay
station, so they could
never check it down."
Sturgis
talked then about Schweiker
and the Reagon situation and
I said
I thought they would have a
tough fight on their hands
against Ford who, after all, has all the power. "1 disagree
with you, " said sturgis.
"1
think the power is up there and
they're advising him
what to do.
He's being controlled, like
all Presidents are. Certain power groups control, you know
what I mean?"
He changed the subject and mentioned he had been out in California
last week. He said
he was invited out by Chuck Ashman La former
Miamian who has a radio or TV talk show out there and has
wiitten some exploitation books about the Mafia and the cla].
Sturgis said he has Oscar Fraley
i Cauthor of "The Untouchables")
who wants to do the
story of his life. EFraley's latest book
is on Jimmy Hoffal.
He said he has been trying to get a hold of his ex-agent friend
(Salvatore) who told him about
the Ruby in Havana story to get
more information
but the quy is in the Domican Republic for
the week.
Sturgis then asked if it were possible to get a copy of the
Tarabochia memo and I said l would
check on that
with my office.
The conversation got back on the ClA:
"The ClA is very funny," he
said.
"They
do things right up to a point and then they turn right
around and screw you.
Depending what their policy is; lf they
want to change it they'll change it and bury your ass
700.:"In
the last few years they've had their own internal, power struggle
and in that struggle a lot of people sa get hurt who are decent
people. Like if I favor Howard Hunt and his boss gets whacked out.
then everybody down the line goes. That could go into hundreds or
couple thousand people.
Just like when Helms left. I told you
that Nixon wanted
some
files
from
Helms and Helms
wouldn't give
it to him; so the president fired
him.
Now
I'm assuming..from
my discussions with certain ClA officials fired now. the files
he wanted
pertained to the Bay of Pigs and also the JFK assassination.
And Helms didn't to turn them over.
He was scared that if he
turned it over to the President, that Maldeman
and Erlichman
would have used it for political
reasons. And
after Helms was
fired McCord turned
aax around
and said, 'If Helms goes, all the
trees in the forest will fall!' That's why McCord blew
the
NW 50955
Doold:32264840 Page 9
---
## Page 10
4
whistle on the President. Well, you know who Deep Throat was,
don't you?
I think Helms ordered Bennett to bury Nixon.
Deep Throat was probably several guys, but the main man was
Bennett, the ClA man.
Unfortunately poor Howard got sucked
into this thing, I don't think he even knew anything about it.
And Bennett was his boss, both at the Mullen company and
I suspect, his ClA chief also. Oh yeah, I believe certain
ClA officials,
Helms the major one, set up Nixon to be caught.
And the company's hot at me because I told all this to the
Rockefeller and the Senate Watergate committees. But fuck'em,
they screwed me enough
all these years.
Maybe Schweiker will
get to be the Vice President and j'11
get him to get
me
into ClA and 1'1l clean
that place up myself..."
And on that note....
##
50955
DooId: 32264840
Page
10
---
## Page 11
-Notes -- call from Frank Sturgis wl Ed Keiser. 8/2/76 tatel
Says
he's
at a friend's house
and this friend just came back
from
Israel.
He was in one of the big notorious prisons over
there, Pomley (sp?) prison outside Tel Aviv, the top security
prison where
all the major captured terrorists are locked up..
... his friend is very much in with the American dews in this
area and he had gone to Israel with the idea of trying to
help Israel
as an undercover agent, to help infiltrate the
He did that and came back with a lot of information.
sturgis told him. he would
try to get someone to talk with
him because he feels there is much
information his friend
has that our government should be avare of, since he made
friends and has
lot of connections
now with the terrorist
leaders in prison.
He put himself in prison with. the knowledge
of Israeli Intellengence.
"This guy has worked for me in the past and he's worked as
an undercover agent for several federal agencies.
He used to
be with the French
Foreign Legion, the guy is really a hot-shot
guy. "
--Name is Edwin Keiser .
sturgis said he thought I might find
this guy's story of interest. "Whether it can be of
any help
to you or schweiker, I don't know. After all, your boy is
running for politics
now. "
I said I didn't know whether Schweiker would be interested in
that information since it's really outside our subject area.
"You never can tell," said Sturgis, "you know how politicians
are.
If they think there's a little bit of something that they
might be able. to use and Schweiker, I don't know what a kind of
religious background he's got but that sounds. Jewish anyway."
I said
wasn't interested in the political
aspects of any kind
of intelligence
information and /didn't think schwiker.was either.
"Well, why don't you just say hello to my friend here anyway,
1:
said Sturgis. "He's got an interesting backgoound, l've known him
for a number of years and he's good to know.
"Hell, Frank," I said, "isn't there anybody you don't know?"
iSturgis laughed and
said,
"Well, there were some people I swear l
didn't know and l'd
like
to keep it that way. Ha, ha, ha, you know,
one of those things."
Ed Keiser got on the phone and said that his problem was that the
American Embassy in Israel, specifically the vice consul (whose
name is John Adams and who
is, in fact, chief of the ClA station),
told him
That when he:
Keiser, returned to the l.s. he would be
in touch with certain
people and now he
found that no one wants
to talk with him, because
technically he's under arrest for having
left this country with
a xasxe falsified
passport.
He says he had lost his
citizenship back in the mid-50's, without
his knowledge of losing it, when ate he joined the kraa French
Foreign Legion. He says it
was taken away without a hearing or trial
and he has since found out that shouldn't have been done.:
. He says,
however, he has
never stopped fighting Communism and he has been
out of the country several times
since then on false passports.
NH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 11
---
## Page 12
2
This last time he went to Israel he went on a forged passport and
after a month and a half he gave himself up and agreed to work
undercover in the prison for
the Israeli government.
He was
in Romley prison for five and a half months, including with
the 43 people they wanted to exchange on the hijacking
program
in Uganda, all the top-ranking terrorists.
He ked left in
good standing with these terrorists, including the six jews
and 30 Arabs who had plotted to take over the Israeli government
who had come in out of Syria.
He dame back to the U.s. to be prosecuted, paroled to this
country by the Israeli government an an Ra Israeli.
'I brought back quite a bit of information with me," he said.
For instance, he said, he was in prison with an American. whose
father is
very
big
man in the California movie business.
The
son was arrested for smuggling a half a ton of hashish, and
his family is dealing heavily here in the States and in south
America with cocaine and other drugs...
The Federal agents he's xxx
tried to talk with said they
can't talk with him because he's
under arrest aar
(for
false
use of a passport and his case
is not resolved.
"It's really stupid," he says. "I'm carrying
information around
with me, I supposed to be in
contact with intelligence over there
and
carry on with what l was doing, and I can't even talk with
people in my own coumtry to see if
they want me to continee.:
He was arrested by FBI here
after he arrived at kennedy airport
after being deported by
Israel.
They
put a $25,000 bond on x him
in New York and another $25,000 bond in Miami.
They a brought him
here for prosecution
because
here's where he
falsified the passport.
Me sags he was also
subpoenaed to Watergate when
Frank was
involved
andihe brought up information that could have really helped
Frank,
the information
was taken but nothing was done.
•"It was
really a sad
thing,' he said. " think it was just
used politically.. I had agents
in Cuba that were coming out of Havana who were willing to come here
and testify, but the Senate wouldn't send a PBY or couldn't get
authorization to pick them up.
This
all went to Howard Baker and
his
assistant Liebenaood and
they didn't do anything.
I have but
one life to
live and
I'll give it to my country, but l felt sour
about that..
He said he was
working
with the Cubars here in Miami
for a while
after Watergate but he
decided to go
to Israel and fight Communish
there "because those people are serious."
He says he effectively infiltrated the terrorist and communist groups
within Israel prisons and he brought
out important information
but
now
"it seems like my own country could care less about it."
He says he'd like to get the information primarily to: the ClA, especially
stuff about the & PLO. He says he has
pages of information which,
"if
he dropped on the United Nations
"would blow the lid off.": He wouldn't
do that, of course, without
the authorization of his government; "But
I'm sitting
on a g
keg of dynamite
here and I don't know why my
government is not. at
least talking with me... If they want to put me
jal!, put me jail, but at least first talk to me."
NN 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 12
---
## Page 13
3
He says his wife put up their house to raise money for his bond.
He says. he's being represented by a public defender because
he
cant afford an attorney: Edward G. Galante (305-350-4391)
He says he talked
to people from DEA who say they're interested
in what I got and to head of intelligence of U.s. Customs
(Steve Czukos) here in South Florida == but they all put him
off and he hasn't heard
from any of them.
--meanwhile,
he says he is supposed to get back in touch aäk with
Israeli intelligence, he has a code and it was should have
been started a week ago, but he doesn't want to start it up
again without making our government aware of what he is going.
He says he also has
agents with the PLO who are waiting now
in Rome for him and he has been putting that off too.
He says his attorney is talking about making a deal with the
government but he's not interested, he's interested only in
getting out the information he has...
"I think that the information l have has something to do with
the security of this nation,
because it has something to do
with the security of Israel."
He says just the information
he has on
drugs alone is valuable.
The guy he met in prison who was busted with a half tone of
hash should be
out in two or three weeks and he's on be his
way back to California with a conspiracy he put together in
the Israeli prison..
Keiser says he's got knowledge of how
drugs are coming in, who's arranging for them, and who is
carrying them.
He says the DEA told him they are interested but because he is
still on charges and has a court case
pending, it is not. allowed
to talk with him or work. dak with him..
SHis home number is 832-3358.
He said: "If you can't get a hold of
ame, you can always get a hold of Frank and he'll know where l am
because l don't do
anything without his knowledge anyway."
I told Keiser I don't know what, if
anything, I could do about
his problem
but that I would bring it to the
attention of my office.
Sturgis than got on the line again and said that what keiser forgot
to
mention to me is
that he has
information that PLO leaders are
using the drug traffic to finance their terrorist operations.
ATHT
50955
DooId: 32264840
Page
13
---
## Page 14
sturgis
8/4/76
tatel
--asked if | contaeted the person who got the note from
Cuba re
meeting of Castro
and
Ruby... asked if l would give him the ar
names and details again of the Tarabochia memo...
- doesn't know the name of Pratkin or Paskin mentioned in memo..
(Why would Ruby visit him?) well, why would
Ruby go visit
McWillie.. You know
Mcwillie was one of the big boys there...
so evidentally he had more than one connection... but remember
when he went over there there were no more racket guys there,
so why would he go see this man?
--Trafficante came out, I think, in 60, when they closed the
casinos... that was after l came
out...l left in
June of *2882*959-
1959
-- the casinos were still operating..
(Could Trafficante have had a deal with Castro?) I doubt it.
Remember I closed the casinos for 10 days on Castro's orders.
There was a big uproaa.
I told Trafficante and some of these
otherpeople, because l
was in charge of the casinos for
the government, and I told them,
I says, I want to tell you
something
for
your own good, Fidel has said that hasx he's going
to run all the gangsters out
of Cuba and take all their businesses.
On one
of my tours of the casinos I ran into Santos and l told
santos, l said, I want to tell you something, if you see your
other friends
tell them I was in the prime ministers office with
Fidel and Bidel said he's gonna
nationalize all the American
businesses here and he 's goinna run you fuckin' gangsters out
of Cuba.'
And he says,
'Naah, he can't do that, we got over
a hundred million dollars in
investiments here! Who the fuck
does he think he is?! He was really hot. "That sunavatich
should be dead!'
Naah, he was
an
enemy of Fidel's.
(what's behind Crile piece then?) I don't know. Crile took some
cracks at me.
Well, I can't say that's wrong, because l don't
know, all I can say
is what happened to me and what l know.
But, let's face it, Martinez worked for the mob. He was working
for
the Havana Hilton when I met him in 1959 on the baccarat table.
-- knows Aleman, not well. "not buddy
buddy with him like arenar,
never talked to him about this; "I'm
surprised Aleman came up with
that because one time Aleman borrowed some money from Santos when
he needed it."
Trafficante kill JFK?
"I don't think
50, no, I don't think so. The
man most logically to want to kill JFK would
be that guy k in New
Orleans, whassisname,
yeah Marcella.
He would be the logical one."
Surprised Aleman
said that.
"He's got
a lotta balls to say that
in the paper; argestatkex but why didn't it come out down here?"
**
But I don't know why Martinez k is working with Barker. Barker is
a totten sunavabitch.
But one of these days l'll find
out why a
certain ClA
agent wanted me to do a domestic assassimation. I wish
I bad a
good memory to &x find out when it was asked me because that
would nail that sunnavabitch CO of the party, because as I understand
his CO was very leftist and considered
an undercover Communist agent,
but l'll dig it out one of these days..
NH 50955 DocId: 32264810 Page 14
---
## Page 15
2
You know, Ambassador smith called
who was
chief of ClA in Havana
in 1959, a "goddamn Communist."
Oh,
you don't know what
went on...
(Was there a Cogswell also?)
I don't know, l'll have to check
some
of my notes on
some of these things.
You know Paul Bethel
was there also, he was the press agent... that was a nice little
cover...yeah,
he was an
agent... he may be retired right now,
but l believe he's done
some contract work for them off and on...
No, I can't believe that Santos worked with 8d Fidel; You know
I told you that they contacted me once, wanted me to kill fidel..
(Yeah, Norm Rothman asked you,
didn't he?)
Опаха по, по, по.
It was Hymie Levine and another party... but they had
a lot of
connections with other people, besides me, who were constantly
with Fidel and if they wanted
to nail him
they could have..:
Trafficante hangs out at Capra's (80th & Biscayne) when he's
in town... that's one of his people there.... 8 o'clock.
I haven't been there for years, but l know
, I was told one
time, if you ever
want to see me or something like that.
g'oclock,
have spaghetti with
me, you know, we'll both hit,
but I don't go there,
I don't mess with him, I keep
away
from zee mob...not my kind of people...
NH 50955 DocId: 32264840
Page
---
## Page 16
Sturgis 8/5/76
tatel
-asked if I spoke to Barker or Martinez yet?
Crile wrote an article about me that didn't put me in a good
light.
0f
course, you know me and Barker a. are on the outs.
I don't like Barker... You know,
I was gonna put Barker's
head through the wall kap in prison.
The sunavabitch
is
freakin!
coward.
I tried to get at him and four of the
prisoners grabbed me and he went into the corner like
goddamn baby, the sunavabitch.
But l'11 fix his ass.
You know I told the Senate Watergate Committee that
one
CIA
associate of mine asked me to do a domestic assassination,
and I told *e them it was Bernard Barker.
Add I told them,
if you don't believe me,
give me a polygraph...And his
CO was a goddamn Communist bastard! (yells)
Because he
sure loved Fidel, even over here.
But I told Barker I wanted
the orders directly from the because l wanted to make
sure l knew who the & people was...
I told Barker, if you're
co told you to contact me, then
I want to see him...then
the co told him he didn't
o want me to
do it...
And I don't
know what year
this
was...
•The Rockefeller Commission really
went into detail with me on that.
told them, I says, well,
• 111 be honest with you, because
this is why l'm so mad at
these goddamn ClA officials.
They get you to do their dirty
work and after a while they throw you to the wolves, like
they did at the Watergate and...uhh, you know... uhhh.. so now
I'm down
on them. Fuck em.
well, whatayagonna do?
lasked him who Barker's CO was:
talked
around it) Barker had
same CO here as he had in Havana
I forget who is CO was.,
because an employee had various
types of agents: Barker and
Martinez were contract agents,. I was not a contract agent, because
-2X 34X
I didn't sign a contract and
didn't swear to arreax secrecy,
but I was a so-called field operator recruited by them to
work for them on a cash basis, for a week or for months...but
I wasn't in the same position
Barker and Martinez was...because
there were times here when they wanted me to turn in Cubans
making raids against Cuba and I said, Hell, you gotta be kiddin'
I'm
a goddamn
revolutionary! Just because you people are not
assisting Cubans anymore,
l'm gonna
turn them in? Fuck you, l'm
not gonna
like l was very close to Sam Jenis and
whole x family, we were very close, very close, since 1956,
and I worked with that whole family, and two of the family
members
were ClA people, but they knew
how I felt, they knew I would
never betray the cubans..
... this here David Phillips, he knocked the shit out of me on
televisoon, he said, "We
never did no
assassination, and Sturgis
is full of
shit, he never had no association with. us, he never
was an agent!"
Well, fuck him; the sunavabitch, a week later
all the shit
broke loose about assassinations and all, and the
Gianncanna bit, and then admitted
on
television that when he was
chief of
western hemisphere division, that he notified the Cuban
government--Castro!
--through the Czechoslovakian embassy, when
Cuban groups were leaving the
south Florida area to da.go to
CubaR and a do operations against him.
Here's a man admitting
that he was betraying Cubans to.
be caught over there and executed!
NY 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 16
---
## Page 17
********
(1 heard & he was involved in some Castro assassination attempts
that never came off)
"I'm gonna tell you something.. I think it's a little game they
play.
I think the plots that they
wanted us to do were simply
done
to go ahead and make certain people think that they were
working.
But I think what they were doing all along, they were
really betraying us, you know
what I mean?
They have one
policy: Nail 'em,
but behind the
door stop it. The Cubans
had.a d force here and they had this feeling against Castro;
SO
to pacify certain people who had
lot of influence here, they
had to pacify
them by saying, well, we're gonna do things, but
at the same time they're doing the
betrayal bullshit...
And
David Phillips convinced me
that they had been doing
this all
along, just betraying everyone, the American public and everyone..
(I hear he was pretty much involved in the Chilean thing also)
Who, Phillips?
With the Allende thing? You better believe it!
l1 asked him why did David Phillips have an interest in his
Cellula Fantasma operation, as l had heard he had?)
I don't
know, he said,
I really don't know. Well, he was pretty high
up, you know.. leven in 61, 62?)
••well, yeah..."
Said the
guy in charge
was conte-Aquerra, he worked for
the company, later
they sent him
to Europe on an economic mission...
"Then Diaz-Lanz
go!
into
the picture, he was suppose
to take over the group,
and that's what started a
lot of problems.
We had a lot of
problems and
think this is where David Phillips came in, becaase
;then
he started to get interested, you
know, because of Pedro
Diaz Lanz
coming into the group."
"I'm writing
a book.
I sign a contract with Oscar Fraley this
Sunday."
Doing a movie with Morgan on the Trujillo thing, and
Fraley will do the book of his life, less the trujillo thing..
-talk to Pedro Diaz Lanz, that's how
1got involved in the Trujillo
thing.
for the people.
Geraldine Shamma will tell you that also. she hates him..
(Do, you see him much?) Not too much. When we were in prison, yean.
Talk to Pedro diaz labo"fell you artimes andedle.
And talk to him about Artime. You Artime is still working
Artime's an double agent.
But since l've been out l've kept away from him.
don't want a
goddamn thing to do with the company...
-- (About about Roselli?) I think they nailed him good. How do l
read it? Cuban agents.
But | leave
a question mark.
I hate to
jump on something
else, really, but they're capable of doina
anything.
"Cause I did
a lot of dirty work for the sunavabitches,
believe
me,
and they'll get people like me - because you know l
was considered one of the most six dangerous men in thexartax
country - and
they can get people like me to do a lot of their
dirty work, you know what
I mean, because it leaves their hands
clean and if they want to discredit you they can because they have
the force and the power, they got everything working for them...
But l'll give them the benefft of the doubt, I don't think they
had anything to do with killing the President through. That l'll give
them the benefit of the doubt...
• NH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 17
---
## Page 18
Sturgis
8/16/76
-
tatel
I had the FBl call me.
On the JFK stuff.
They
said, well,
you made
some statements on television andwe'd
like
tO
get together with you.
Met them over at Denny's. It- was
about when I went to Calif. and was on TV out there
and made
certain statements about the meeting with Castro and Jack
Ruby
and they wanted to know about that... said Wash, calledthem.
agents..Ben Conte
and???
... When I asked them
about the letter, they told me that
O'Connor had investigated that and that o'connor was the
one who spoke withme
about the JFK assassmadion.
But
they told they didn't know
anythingabout a letter...
*** O'Connor now
in New Orleans????
Hey did you read anything about four constables fron
Dallas
who received a box of letters and documents pertaining to a
meeting between Oswald and Ruby and
soforht??
This box of
33 documents turned over to Dallas DA Henry Wade....???
...well, a friend of mine called
me up last night and I
copied
down
some shit on it...you
want to read you sore
of this??? (is this from& clippings?) It may have
because he told me he got it out ofsore papers...
... they turned it over to the FBl. and they gave a number
and now they can't find the documents.
Canyoubelieve that?
Just like
they can't find the letter, they can't find the
documents...
..You never got a whold of Salvadore, did you?
(You never gave
me his name)
Yes,
I did, I gave you his
phone number but
he told me
he wouldn't talk toyou, Schweiker!s
man..
Salvadore Garcia - former ClA guy... says he doesn't like
Schwelker.
The 8 FBI guys also asked me
I didn't believe l knew Roselli.
about it... They asked me
Rome about old them
about Roselli. I told them
I told them l know nothing
what I thought, I said I fought the
mob got rid of him..they're always fightingamong: temselves..
(re Crile pieces) l don't believe it.
I don't think Trafficante
had anything to do with it.
l don't
believe a guy like Trafficante
could
go ahead and do something like
that on his own,
he would
have to get permission
from the Commission, and I don't believe
the commission would
allow him to do something
like that. They
tried it once before with Anastasia.
Anastasia wanted.totake
over some of the gambling in Havana and the Commission said no.
What happened, he went against the Commission's orders And
Look what
happened to him.: The same thing happened to Dutch
schultz who wanted to knock off Tom Dewey.
I can't see it.
don't think the mob would want that kind ofcatastrophe tohappe
to kill the president.
NW 50955 DocId:32264840. Page 18
---
## Page 19
(re the Rolling Stone piece and Trafficante relation
to the
Bay of Pigs
and his contact in thatoperation, Fs)
(Laughed) Was that
in. Rolling
Stone?
You
know, I'm trying
to
get
my lawyers to sue them
sunavabitches for about $20 million.
Well, you know the mob was here on
the Beach. And remember
I told you how in cuba the emiessy
was divided and
how smith
ven accused
the chief of station of ClA, of being
a communist
because all his agents were feeding information
to the guerillas
and Castro...
And here you have
the mob
over there, all
these Cubans who were working for the mob
over there,
they came over here and the ClA made agents out
of them!
So, hey, the mob knew everything was going on..
You know, you
had
Normie Rothman who had the Biltmore Terrace,
which was Batista's money, the top floor over there was
going to house Batista if
the government gave me him permission
to come into thecountry.. Now that place was the hang out
of a lot of mob people.. a lot.. and a lot of cuban ClA boys
used to work for Batista.
• . and
alos intelligence agents
from other countries would come in
there...and
the
American
ClA agents used to go wine and
dine there,
used to have
a ball there
..and as far as
I'm concerned, l don't have contact adie with
Santos Trafficante here and I don't have any contact with the
mob..
(re Watley's statement of Sturgis contact with Trafficante)
HON
Well,
/ don't
know how Richard Waatley can go ahead
and
say
shit
like that because that's :
garbaxge....That is
garbage!
(Who was Whatley?):
*Whatley was one of these mercenaries who used to fool
around with this ferry Patrick, trying to get involved
with the Cuban exiles...
You know, when I came
out of cuba they came up withall sorts
of wild
stories that I was the contact between the mob
and te
CIA... that'a
all bullshit
-re a conflict of interest. on Ellis Rubin part because of suit
with Hunt and him against CREEß (???>
.. But I'm going to Washington anyway tomorrow.. Yeah, I told you
that Senator Baker wanted to see me..yeah, they called me,
Michael Madigan and Howard Liebengood called me, they sayd,
come on up, weld like to talk
to
you about this JFk shit.
Yeah, I was
surprised....
(re Martinez working at Havana Hilton and Crile saying no)
That's bullshit.
That's where I met Martinez when
I was
working for the Embassy.
I told that to the Senate Watergate
Committee when they
asked me...(why) Well, because Martinez has
been working on $100 month retainer for the ClA and he has probably
dug up a lot of information for the company and writing thebook
with Crile and talking about Trafficante and Aleman, so naturally
the ClA don't want anybody to know there was any connection. de's
not goxax going to admit he worked for the bauxa gamblers..
met him. at the
Havana Hilton working on the baccarat table..
(fairly well off?) Yeah, he did abortions, he had a whore hose
over there... yeah, he was pretty well off...
NW 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 19
---
## Page 20
3
(re WerBell trial) Yeah, you know I recruited the undercover
agent that got Bernstine.. Jerry Buchanan...
I got a hold
of the company first because
it was out of the country,
because they have a drug.. you
know,, thing, but they
slammed the door on
me when I contacted them...l even
had to go to Washington for the damn
thing...so
I got a
hold
of other friends of mine and they made the conneetion..
that's how derry was recruited...and he made out pretty good,
they busted one of the biggest
international aux drug
conspiracies
in
the country....
and Bernstine turns around
and
he starts to work for the government..
(undercover?) Buchanan got involved up. to his eyeballs with
Bernstine... I don't know how he made the connection...
(Bernstine involved
in Bay of Pigs?) I think that's all
bul$shit
(Bernstine crash an accident?) No, I think somebody killed him.
He's too good
a axa pilot...
(WerBell) Well, he's
sa friend of my old friend Andrew St.
George
and I think maybe Andy has
helped bury WerBell a little
bit...
I swear to God, you can't even trust your friends
nowadays....
HH 50955
DooId: 32264840
Page 20
---
## Page 21
-notes -- Frank Sturgis - tatel - 4/18/77
(partial)
(get any reaction from the New Times piece? Came drunks heavy
on CIA..any reaction from them?)
No, except David Phillips, you know every time he gets a chance
wacks me.
Because I made a big liar out of him..
KaN You
know when I
was in frint of tee Rockefeller Commission, I spent
16 hours with them,
they want over very much withime on the
JFK stuff and the mob stuff and CIA assassinatin plots and
all this
* stuff and everything started to leak out. Then
David Phillips came ut out and started wacking me.
Then
got mad and I
said, Fuck them, the hell with them, I'll just
tell the truth!
And that's when I said, Yeah, damn right,
I been in tron touch with them,
I was associated with them!"
That's when David Phillips went on television and started
knocking me,
saying I was never an agent. I never told anyone
I said I was associated with them. But the truth is
I was recruited by them, because it's on record.
It's in CIA
records
(Did you ever meet Phillips in Havana?) I don't know. This
is the problem. I don't
KnoW.
You know my contact man, the
CO I was working with, was Colonel Nichols.. And Nichols had
Major Van Horn working with him..
And I met a few other CIA
guys but I had never any contact with because the rest was
strictly telephone.
You know when you make contact with
an agent, an employee, and you are directly in contact with
someteing happens where
teey have to leave, well,
they li give you a code name and they 1l dive you a number
and they'll tell you that this man hexexer here, so and so,
will contact you,
and this is the number.
Then
he disappears
and then it's strictly telephone. You never really in touch
with one another, after the first shot, after your first man
leaves.
..Just like Barker. Barker met Hunt only one time. When he
vas turned over to Hunt...'cause Howard told me thi'...I said,
How many times did Barker ever meet you? He says, Well, one
time.
shasxax His man, who Barker was in touch
when
he came over here, he
says, he turned Barker over to me,
I needed
an assistant,
has he says, so he turned Barker over
me, I met him one time and then after that we checked by
telephone, the normal way of contact. He says
after that when
I left, I
turned Barker over to somebody else, he said.
It all depends on the situation you're in. Like Martinez, he was
in maritime operations and so forth.
Well, when you're in
maritime
operations you come in direct contact with one or more CIA CO's
at one time....las a result of working on a ship where CIA officials
xe are sir restricted in their movements).. in maritime you have
more personal contact with them, because thep stay with the nahrar
mother ship...
(why is Phillips on your back?) Becaase I told the Committee that
the CIA helped Fidel. The Communists were out to kill Fidel at the
NW 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 21
---
## Page 22
2
very beginning when
we came out of the mountains. When
Ambassador Smith asked the CIA the background of
the Castro
brothers and his top military officials, the Cia
said no
they had no communist background. Well, the FBI in the Embassy
was given all the information on the Castro brothers, but
the CIA wouldn't give Smith the correct intelligence
informatoon.
Smite called |
William Cardwell, was the CIA station & chief and
noteing but a fuckin communist.
90% of tee agents that work for me here are noteing but
pro-communist bastards.
That's why CIA had Smith removed
through pressure in Washington.
was another
one of them.
was way to the left.
He was later Barker's CO here, and that sunavabitch
(when was
Barker's CO here?) Right after Hunt
You
see, Hunt
Teft a week before the invasion.
got tr
be Barker's next political officer.
Hunt went back up
to
Washington and was in the Cuban desk, and the man... remember
Hunt was
a political officer...and Hunt was transferred from
the politicad office tr work with David Phillips, who was
propaganda...
(When wa$ Bender here?)
Frank Bender?, He was here before,
during and after the Bay of Pigs. Fle's a queer sunavabitch.
(Wasn't he Barker's CO?) No! Bender? No!
Bender was
over-all chief
of CIA here for the poliitcal section. That's
old Droller.
He was
German born...and he was faggot too.
No, he wasn't Barker's CO. Barker's CO was Hunt and teen
it was
like
Hunt..
worked under Bender, just
[Not
Droller also called DRESCHER...]
(Don't know where Droller is now; may be retired; he's a few
years older than Hunt..)
(RE PRIO) ;
under gir financial pressure recently; wife only allotted
him $1000 a month; he snorted Coke for years;
only those close tr
him knew how much
business
pressure he was under..***I asked a
friend of mine who was close what happened..."
(Duran???]
No, he wasn't involved in narcotics...only yeass ago back
Batista's day, everybody was then..but all he did now was
coke...has all his life...
sniff
NH. 50955 DocId: 32264810 Page
22
---
## Page 23
• 1'
Frank Sturgis- notes - 9/21/77
tre
Lorenz
story)
(Had you known
she
was going to break this?)
No!
I got a call Monday night, tonight's: Wednesday, right?,.from
Paul Meskil, and
Paul
told me, he says, "Frank, Merita gave me
something and I wanted you to de know
about it and I want your
comments
on it." I says,
"Shoot."
He
says,
"You know, she has
made
statements and
gave
it to us and my editor is thinking
about putting it in
the papers."
So! says, "What is it?"
He says,
"Well, she claims, she says, you know, this, this
and this about
Alex Rorke and some pictures somewheres in
a training
camp, l suppose,
you know, and pictures of you,
Daaz Lanz,
I think she mentioned Diaz Lanz, l'm not sure,
well
anyway, me, Oswald and
so forth.
So'l
says, "Oh yeah, what else?"
And he says we had some
maps out with a
couple of Cubans,
Pedro Diaz Lanz, yBurself, Oswald, and it had D*arx&x Dallas,
and that we were, we all
got into two automobiles and
we drove
to Dallas a couple days, a few days, whatever, before the
assassination, and that we went there, and that we were members
of Operation
40, and that we went there specifically to go
ahead
and kill the President of the United States:
I says, "She's got to be out of her goddamn mind! She's gotta
be whacko to say shit like that!.. How the hell can she prove
this?
I says, I volunteered, like you know with the JFK
assassination, to take a polygraph. l says, l'11 do the same
goddamn thing now!
That shels lying."
So ha says something about
supposedly the two pictures
that she had, one was missing with some German girl who was
supposed
to write her
book....
(Had she ever mentioned
this to you before?) Not a thing
cabout that.
You know, my own opinion, she's been messing
around with these gangsters.
And yank you know, the father
of one of her kids is a very wealthy man,
owns some race horses
and stuff like that, a lewish guy, and he's a loan shark for
the mob. (Know
his name?)
Ed something. I think maybe him
or the other da guy might have pushed her, because she's always
bitching that she needs money, and I think maybe more or less
they busted her balls
and
said, hey look, you want cash for
your book, this and that, you gotta k get something spectacular,
you know, they always came
up
with some goddamn mob lawyers
for
her to handle her book and so forth, and you know, she's
a little whacko.
This
is the conclusion l come to, but l don't
know what's behind
her mind to do this, because, hey, we're
friends, but, christ, with something
like this,
she'
s actually
getting
herseef, and
Pedro and muself involved
in killing
the President!
She's gotta
be out of her goddamn mind!
Was she in Miami at that time, in November. of '63?)
"I can't remember that
long.
All I know is,
like l told you, the
iday that Kennedy got killed I was here in the house. It beats the
"hell out of
me,
I can't get remember that long if she was here
at the time.
Merola= matt Melane-ClA
NH 50955-DoeId:32264010 Page 23
---
## Page 24
2
"Well, you
know, too, she was Perez Jimenez's mistréss.
And Perez Jimenez was giving
of the Cuban people
And also in New Orleans, with money
so. forth.
And she told me, at one time, that possibility at one
time that Jimenez wanted to do something against the
Kennedys.
Now I don't know who she meant, weether it
was the President or Bobby Kennedy or what, l don't
but it's something she told
me this pasped year
up in New York.
•How true it is, I don't know.".
(Did
Jimenez have
a lot of money when he was here?)
Shit,
yeah.
He lived on one of the island here,
kept her
in a fancy apartment because you know she had a baby by
Jimenez, a girl, and she's a split image of jimenez.
And the
was involved in all kind of bullshit, Jimenez was.
But who knows whether it's true.
The only way to go ahead
and
get the truth
out of her, like l told Paul, l says
Paul, the people from the Assassination Committee if they
believe her,
should make her come to Washington and put
her under oath, then
ask her to take a polygrah.
And
1'1l xax tell you this, l'll take a polygraph that the
statement that she said is a complete lie! That it is
not so!
No way in the world did l ever travel to Dallas,
Texas with her, with Bosch, with Pedro, or Oswald.
Cause I told the Committee
and I told you, too, hey, to
the best of my knowledge I don't think l ever met Oswald.
Because you know the shit that was coming out of the town
from here, that
I made the statement the FBl got dox going
that oswald was in town here, and this Lyle Stuart, the
guy who was financing the fair Play for Cuba thing, and
that's known as being backed up with Communist money, that.
supposedly Oswald was here and was on a radio station,
there was some article about it in the paper, that he
front of some TV station or something, but
hey, I don't know, this is all some bullshit talk,
I don't
know if he was here or not? But I was talking with a friend
of mine today, Bob Tralins, and he remembered Oswald was
(Talked to him last year)... "Oh you did." (Didn't
rRe Lorenz claim that Hemming was in photol "Yeah, he called
me up last nicht.
(Where was
that training camp supposed to
have
been?)
"Big Pine Key, or No Name.
Well there were several
down there.
We had
one out in the Everalades too.
But eventually
they separated from me and started doing shit on
their own.
Jerry had all the fuckin' garbage all over theunited states in
with
nim,
bunch of crazy bastards." (erry knew Merita,
als0,
didn't he?) "I don't know. That's it, l really don't know.
"But
why Merita would say shit like this, l
really krox don't
know either. But I tell you sometting, she's got a lot of balls,
this gal.
But, hey, this gal here did some good stuff for
the government, believe me.. You know, in the past she turned
NW 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page. 24
---
## Page 25
3
over Communist codes to me, and documents and shit like
that. she worked for the Company before and she worked
for the FBl as
an
undercover
agent for about seven vears,
even had her kid do shit for them.
And she was out being
a mistress. for the top Russian KGB agent in New
York.
She
was his
undercover mistress,
he bought her jewelry and
booze, wining and dining
her. and she was ballin' him.
You know, she won't say it to anybody because it would
make
her look
like a whore, you know, but hey, man, she really
did a job. And I took tabe recordings of all that shit, k
you know, and I turned it over to our
intelligence, they
got it,
they took copies of it
ax and all that. Yeah,
she's got a lot of balls...
(re clicks on
line) "That's probably the FBl bugging me,
ha, ha, ha.
I hope they got a court
order.
Hey, you
know, that's how Nixon lost his 18 minutes of tape, you
know.
the rabe cap.
You know I know who did it, I know
who ordered it.
I was told who ordered it, and l believe
I know the man who x erased it.
It was erased electronically.
(Why?) Well, you remember there were statements l made to
you and then
it came out in the press about Nixon * was
trying to cover himself about the files he wanted from
ClA about the Bay of
Pigs and the missiles and the Kennedy
assassitation,
he ordered Helms to give it to him and
Helms wouldn't
give it to him.
Three times he wouldn't
give it to him
and then Nixon
fired him for it. Well,
in that 18 and half minutes tape l think there were
conversations
on that, that pertained
to what I was talking
about, and this ex-agent told me, he says, "Frank, you're
right, with the statements that you made, you know, that
I read
about what you said about
Nixon being set up and
so forth and about the files and all that, well, l want to
tell you something, l was hired to erase those tapes." And
he says, "It was done electronically. And the man no hired
me was so and so.
And 1 got the tape recordine of it, too.
10f the guy telling you
this?) Yes,
sir. Hopefully, it's
still here.
I mean, hopefully it's
still in my possession,
baerasex you know what l mean,
if I don't go ahead and
get
It.all
erased,
ha.
ha.
But he told
me, and whether it was
bullshit or a
lie done know, bus this quy was an
R ex-CIA:.
agent.
Well, after a period of time these people get a little
disgusted with their government, with what goes on and so
forth times, and
sometimes people will tell other people,
yOU
know, which
is limited to the
people they tell, of so and
SO
and so and so.
Who
knows, it's a
funny world.
I suspect one
of these days
I'm conna xak wake un and somebody is gonna
shoot my ass.
But, hey, *a it's the name of the game..
I don'+
worry about it.
But sometimes I think Pedro is right. You
know he thinks
the Agency is gonna kill him.
He says,
"1 know
too much about the Agency.' You know, he thinks Artime is a
HH 50955. DooId: 32264840
Page 25
---
## Page 26
4
double agent.
(Have you heard
from Artime?) Hell, no,
Artime wouldn't call. me.
You know who called me yesterday?
Howard. (Hunt?) Yeah, ha, ha, ha, Howard.
Here comes all
these press people inside the doors and Howard calls me
on the phone and
says,
"Hey, sorry to hear about this, so
on and
sar so forth.
I saw you on television, you really
did a good job.' Yeah, I says, Howard,. I got
all the press
walking
* in the front door right now.
Ult's a wonder
she didn't put him in this thing, too, huh?)
"Wall, she pulled a boo-boo by saying
that when she
came from Cuba she met Howard Hunt and myself. And I called
her up and I says,
"You never met Howard Hunt and me! It
was not Howard Hunt!T. She says, 'Well, I thought it was
Howard Hunt.' I says, "If you saw Howard Hunt todays you
wouldn't know who the
hell the man was! How & could you
go ahead
and say that?'
She says, 'Well, it don't make
no difference, what difference does it make?' I says, 'It
makes a
lot of
difference!' I says,
"I never knew Howard
at that Fime. ' I says,
"Now l'm
under oath telling these
people, the senate Watergate Committee that taxI didn't
know Howard,
never met -- which
is true, you know -1
never personally
met Howard until either late 171 or 172
and you come
up with
a cockamania
story that Frank arranged
for my escare out of Cuba and the
first people l meet in
Miami is Frank Sturgis and
E. Howard Hunt.
You gotta be
crazy! To say shit like that, oh God.
But she wants to
get in the goddamn papers.
You know
Howard's been hittin'
the
papers quite a
bit.
But I says,
"Why do you want to
put the man in the jackpot for? That's a lie.' I says, "Them
people ever ask you to take a polygraph, for christ's
sake,
they'll make a goddamn liar out of you.
Because you never
met Howard Hunt because
I never knew Howard Hunt.'
She
never met Howard Hunt.
At least the best as l know.
Maybe
in bed someplace she met him, you know, ha, ha, ha. she
sure as
hell didn't
meet Howard Hunt with me?"
NW 50955
DocId: 32264840 Page 26.
--- |
|||||||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10066-10082.pdf | 104-10066-10082 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 12/12/78 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | N. SHEPANEK | "DISSEMINATION OF HSCA DRAFT ON CIA PERFORMANCE" | 2 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK11 : F6 : 1993.07.16.08:20:54:530580 : FILE ORIGINAL WAS MISTAKENLY STAMPED IN 1993. | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10066-10082
17
18.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
31
38
39
is item.
Located
Russ
Sturbelts-LADis
Returned to Ken 6D15
Dete
127218
Shepare peshod
Martin Smell IMS
Julian 7ox cI
ed andress SE
Shepanek PCS/000
ok
rok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
Sentto
ok
ok otS returned detecte
O KI
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
Committee Kite hens a
11
4
HISLA
128478
12 Дe78
18
132078
Shepande pes/or
all copies returned ar
accounted vor as inclicated.
above
12Ve 1978. Returned
---
## Page 2
14-00000
HSCA Draft
CIA Performance - Bark
SENT TO :
DATE SENT
DATE RETURNE)
copy *
16,17
Russ Holmes
21N0x78
19,20,
2),
25,
WmSturbitts
LA DIV
24, 25, th
22,35,J Nobert Staponct
36,37,
PCS 28C
38,39
27,28
29,30,31
32,33
21N00 78
2P Noo78.écs:
18, 20
23,15,26
30 Nar 78ce.
1424
36N0078
2!
21N0078
Martini Smith IMS
2/ N0078
Julian 707685421N78
Cd Andrews- SE)i
21N0N78
27 Now 78
opies tured in l
Dale
12. Dee
Ken x 5655(Pm6215.
22
23
24.
26
32
3
3
34
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10143-10330.pdf | 104-10143-10330 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 4/5/78 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | MR. SHEPANEK | CARPENTIER, PATRICK L. | MEMO: HSCA INTERVIEWS OF SR DIVISION INDIVIDUALS | 2 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK58 : F8 : 1993.07.30.14:37:43:280041 : | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10143-10330).
SECREI
OLE RECUTS COPY
Intervieno
OLC 78-0443/3
5 April 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Shepanek
0/SA/DO/O
FROM
: Mr. Patrick L. Carpentier
Assistant Legislative Counsel
SUBJECT
: HSCA Interviews of
Individuals (S)
SR Division
1. (S) Michael Goldsmith, HSCA staff, called concerning the
Committee's letter of 2 March 1978 and requested that the Committee
will contine its interviews of persons assigned to the
only to those people that were then assigned to the SR Division. The
remaining individuals listed can be completely disregarded.
2. (S) Goldsmith also requested that arrangements be made for
staff investigator Harold Leap to interview those persons now serving
in Headquarters who were assigned to the SR. Division of the
in 1963. At this time we will arrange such interviews only
for those persons who served in the SR Division during the months of
November and December 1963•
3. (S) Will you please follow through and make the necessary
arrangements. After the first group is interviewed, we will discuss
this request with Goldsmith and Leap to determine whether or not it
will be necessary to interview those people that were assigned to the
Pin 1963 prior to the assassination.
Datect Hau
carpentier
21022
SECRET
airper cL erll 3423
---
## Page 2
=..
Distribution:
Orig - Addressee
• - OLe Subject
1 - OLC Chron
OLC: PLC:jms (5 Apr 78)
...
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 180-10142-10018.pdf | 180-10142-10018 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | HSCA | 00/00/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 22-19-01 | CIA | 119 | HSCA | CIA SEGREGATED COLLECTION | 3/12/18 | Box 10 | null | ## Page 1
180-10142-10018
Classification:.
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
THIS COPY IS NOT
FOR RELEASE.
JFK 38X22
Folder 19
Cover Sheet
The attached package of paper is the property of
the House Select-Committee on Assassinations,
and is
on loan to CIA under an agreement whereby CIA is not
to reproduce or copy the draft or any portion thereof.
Notes may be taken on materials in this package,
and rough notes may be prepared as a basis for informal
and oral
exchanges with HSCA representatives.
These
notes, however
are to be held as though controlled and
aTi
to be destroyed under agrecd conditions with HSCA.
They are not
be copied or excerpted and are to be
heid
until further instructions are received for
• eventual disposal
These papers have been numbered for accountability
receipted accordingly. They are to be handled. on
a secure basilis
though constituting sensitive papers
on a need-tö..
or basis.
RERPORIICTION
DO NOT REPRODUCE
RETURN TO CIA
Copy 250f 42
Classification:
10142-100181
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 2
Berk-writelassification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.).
(1)
Purpose and
Scope of Study
The Central Intelligence Agency's performance
in its role of support to the Warren Commission
public concern durin
nas been a source of controversy since) the pasT
neef then her sensen commission. Critics
have repeatedly charged that the CIA participated
in a conspiracy designed to suppress information
relevant
to the assassination of President Kennedy•
During 1976 the Critic's
assertions were the subject of official inguiry
by the Senate Select Committee to Study
(SS<)
Governmental Operations therein
=1 SsC). The
SSC, in its report regarding. "The Investigation
of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy:
Performance of the Intelligence Agencies" reached
Findino
he following cone-lusion
The Committee emphasizes that it has
not uncovered any evidence sufficient
to justify a conclusion that there was
a conspiracy to assassinate President
Kennedy•
The Committee has, however, developed
evidence which impeaches the process
Classification:
Classified BAliArAnO
---
## Page 3
SEC
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from A wisco led de merel i gence agencies
arrived at their own conclusions.
about the assassination, and by
which they provided information
to the Warren Commission.
This
evidence indicates that the
investigation of the assassina-
tion was deficient and that facts
which might have substantially
affected™
the course of the inves-
tigation were not provided
the
Warren Commission or those
individuals within the EBI and
withinvestigating the asgassina-
tion:
(SSC, DocKI,P6)
(2)
Th1
ommittee has sought to examine in
greater detail the general findings of the SSC.
The Committee has particularly focused its attention
on the specific issue of whether the CIA or any
employee or former employee of the CIA misinformed.
or withheld information relevant to the assassina-
tion of President Kennedy from the Warren
Commission. In addition, the Committee has
attempted to determine whether, if the Warren
Commission was misinformed or not made privy to
information relevant to its investigation,
the misinforming or withholding of
evidence from the Warren Commission was the
Classification:
Classified Groan: _
---
## Page 4
* The AM-LASH
One. of fire
CIAT
3
Classification:
S5/32T.
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
result of a conscious intent to do so by the
Agency or its employees.
(3)
The Committee has sought to examine the
issue detailed above in both an objective
and disciplined manner.. In order to accomplish
this goal the Committee has utilized a 1977 TasS fie
(19.77 T FR).
Repost by the CIA*s, Inspente
general
lis Report was highly critical of
pertaining tothe AMLASHeperation*
the SSC findings and asserted that the SsC
the militia
Final Report conveyed(an)
) impression of limited
effort by the CIA to
assist the Warren Commission
TER
in its work. The 7 IGR was in fundamental
disagreement with this characterization of the
SSC findings and noted that "CIA did seek and
collect information in support of the warren
Commission. Additionally, it conducted studies
and submitted special analyses
andreports..3
(TE, Intaction to ta)
(4)
In order to
demonstrate further the scope
of support provided by the CIA to the Warren
19
PFR
Commission, the
77
IR contained a comprehensive
listing of CIA generated material made available
/р.т.
Classification:
operation wis
adsendination plots!
Classified by derivan 0 0 0 02
---
## Page 5
D/TI
(5)
(6)
(7)
Classification: -
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
to both the U.S. Intelligence Community and
the Warren Commission regarding the assassina-
tion of President Kennedy. In this respect,
the committee agrees with the y7 tes
‹ wherein
it is stated that "This compiliation (of
CIA generated material) is appropriate to
consideration of the extent of the CIA effort,
to the extent that it reveals something of
the results of that effort
TEK
177 IER, Introduction
to Tab E)
'In examining the Agency's comprehensive
listing of CIA generated material referenced above,
the Committee has paralled its review to the
structure given to these materialsby the
TFR
1?7 IGR.
In this regard the ?? fer details four inter-
related compilations of Kennedy assassination
material: These four compilations are:
1) Agency dissemination of information
to the Intelligence Community (Formal
and Informal Disseminations)
2) Dissemination of material to the
Warren Commission
Classification: _
000003
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 6
- 5
Classification:
(P)
This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.) •
3) Agency dissemination to the FBI et al
regarding rumors and allegations
regarding President Kennedy's
assassination
9)
4) Memorandum submitted by CIA to the
Warren Commission on Rumors
and
Allegations Relating to the President's
Assassinati
177 TEl Introduction
to Tab F
(10)
In reviewina these compilations,
the Committee
focused upon those
TER
CIA materials which the ?? teR documented as having
bein
^ made available in written form to the Warren
Commission.
(11)
During the course of this study, additional
Agency files have been revieved. These files have
been examined in an effort to resolve certain
issues created by the review of the Agency's
compilations discussed in this report. Where
apparent gaps existed in the written record,
files have been requested and reviewed in an effort
to resolve these gaps.
Where significant substantive
Classification:
000004
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 7
Classification: -
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
issues have arisen related to the kind and
quality of information provided the Warren
Commission, files have
also been requested and
reviewed in an effort to resolve these issues.
As a result, approximately thirty files, comprising
an approximate total of ninety volumes of
material have been examined and analyzed
in preparation of this report.
(2)
The findings set forth herein are subject
to modification due to the following considera
tions.
During the course. of the past fifteen
years; the CIA has generated massive amounts of
information related to the assassination of
President Kennedy. In spite of the Agency"s
sophisticated doeument-retrieval system, Certain
documents reguested by this Committee for study
and analysis have not been located. Whether these
documents merely have been filed incorrectly or
destroyed, gaps in the written record still
do
000005
exist.
( 13)
Secondly, due to dissimlar standards of investigative
---
## Page 8
Classification:
septer.
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
relevancy adopted by the CIA and this Committee,
certain files requested by the Committee for
review ::
have been made available to
the Committee in a santized fashion.
Therefore,
to the degree reflected by the Agency's denial
of access and/or santization of certain materials,
this study's conclusions are based upon the
best evidence available to the Committee though
this may not be all relevant evidence to which
( 14)
the Agency has access.
One must, moreover, give due consideration
to the role that oral discussions, oral briefings,
and meetings of Warren Commission and CIA
representatives may have played in the supply of
assassination-related information by the CIA to
the Warren Commission. The subject and substance
of these discussions, briefings, and meetings
may not always be reflected by the written
record made the
subject of this study.
Therefore, the Committee has conducted interviews,
depositions and executive session hearings with
000006
ElA files pertaining to AMMuS-1, Maria Teresa Prenza,
edwins
Is parsonal 5a42 nodings dere muds
aveilabiClossificationi..ttec subject to Aginay
Sanitraition of the n
T.
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 9
Classificatish: =
-Se
Thiss form is to
sed for materi
extracted
- 8 CO
key Warren Commission staff and members and
former or present CIA representatives in an
effort to resolve questions that are not
addressed by the written record.
The results
of the Committee's efforts to chronicle this
(15)
aspect of the working relationship between the
Warren Commission and the CIA will be a subject
for discussion herein.
In addition
this report will examine the
following subjects generated by the Committee's
study (as outlined aboves in the following general
order of discussion:
18)
(11)
(18)
1) the organization of the CIA's investigation
of President Kennedy's assassination;
2)
the working relationship of the Warren
Commission staff and those CIA répresentatives
concerned with the Warren Commission inquiry;
3)
the standards of investigative cooperation
thal
which the Warren Commission staff believed
to govern the quality and quantity of
information supplied by the CIA to the
Warren Commission;
Alassification: =
000007
20.0513
Easified By derivation S. Berk
---
## Page 10
Etassifieation:
pet
-8a-
(19)
4)
(20)
5)
the CIA's concern for protection of its
sensitive sources and methods and the
consequent effects of this concern
upon the warren Commission investigation;
and
the substance and quality of information
concerning Luisa Calderon passed to the
Warren Commission and the results of this
Committee's investigation of Calderon
and her significance to the events of
November 22, 1963.
II. Select Commitice Stuig si
Information Made Available by CIA to Warren
Commission
Sel CIA page 2000517 infra
for beginning of this section
It invatigation a the cit involued an extensive
andly is of some fits. sentine vources and method
Beccuse the round and method and button
disclosure, portion to this report have been
---
## Page 11
Erassification: -
To be insated prior to Section II
I. Organization of CIA Investigation
of President Kennedy's Assassination
(21)
In his Executive Session testimony before the Select
Committee, Richard Helms, the CIA's Deputy Director for
Plans during 1963, described the CIA's role in the
investigation of President Kennedy's assassination as
follows:
(12)
This crime was committed on United
States soil. Therefore, as far as the
Federal government was concerned, the pri-
mary investigating agency would have been
the Federal Bureau of Investigation without
any question. The role
of the CIA would
have been entirely supportive in the sense
of what material we are (sic) able to
acquire outside the limits of the United
States with reference to the investigation.
For investigative purposes, the Agency
Classification:
000009
20.0535
lassified by
CervaTion
derivation:
---
## Page 12
SECRET
this form is t8 be used for material extrasted
from ElA- egRislled dscuments:)
had no investigative role inside the United
States at all. So when I used here the
word "supportive," I meant that in the
literal sense of the term. We are (sic)
trying to support the FBI and support the
Warren Commission and be responsive to
their requests, but we were not initiating
any investigations of our own or, towmy
recollection, were we ever asked-to
(Executive Session Testimony of Richard
Helms, 8/9/78, pp. 17-18-0
(23)
On November 23, 1963 Helms called a meeting of senio:
level CIA officials to outline the Agency's investiga
tive responsibility vis a vis the assassination
SSCa desk office
(cadquarter Book V, p. 25.)
andrewester
At that time, Helms placed John Scelso, bustin
Branch Chief for CIA operations in Mexico, Central
Ameri
Ponama, in charge of the Agency's initial
investigative-efforts.
(HSCA Class. Deposition of John
'Scelso, 5/16/78, PP. 111-112--ExecSession Testimony
SECRET.
000010
2060503
derivation
Classified by derivation
---
## Page 13
3
ElassifisatisA:
This form is to be
extracted
of Richard Helms, 8/9/78, p. 10.)
(24)
Scelso testified before the (Select Committee
that he was given charge of the Agency's investigation
on the basis of two considerations: 1) 'his prior
experience in conducting major CIA security investi-
reported
to C/#
gations and 2) the observance of Oswald by CIA L
headwater's
surveiHanee in Mexico@ (Scelso's operational concern
less than two months prior to the assassination
(SSC
Book V, P. 25, HSCA Class. Deposition of John Scelso,
WasaH2202490400-20400241441999956
5/16/70, pp. 111-112. 7)
Scelso also noted that
"during the course of his investigative efforts, Helms
did not pressure him to adopt specific investigative
theories nor reach conclusions within a set
period of
MSCA ClASS DeR oR JohnScelso
8/9/78
* Raymond Rocca, Chief of Research and Analysis for
CIA's Counterintelligence Staff characterized Scelso's
responsibility not as a mandate to investigate but
rather to "coordinate traffic (code facilitation,
telegram or telegraphic consideration) for working
with the DDP with respect to what was being done over
the whole world..."
the GPFLOOR, phaser (Ibia.)
Classification: =
000011
2060537
Elasified by derivation:
---
## Page 14
- 4.-
5201
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
(25)
tion:
Scelso described in detail to the Committee the
manner in which he conducted the Agency's investiga-
•..practically my whole Branch participated
in the thing.
We dropped almost everything
else and I put a lot of my officers to work
in tracing names, analyzing files.
reports, suggestions, allegations from all
checked out.
Ne were checking out just dozen:
nd dozens of-people-all thetime, (HSCA Classifie
Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/70, p. 131)*
*. During the course of the Agency's invetigation, Liaison
with the FBI was handled for the CIA by
(Ibid. p. 80.)
At the time of the assassination A.
a former FBI agenti was Chief of the Special Investigations
Group of the CIA's Counterintelligence Staff. (HSeA Classifted
'Deposition of
He
A characterized his functions with respect to the Agency
as follows:
(This footnote - Footnote
*: - continues
on bottom of page 5)
014755
Classification:
000012
26. 0510
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 15
Elassification:
(26)
Scelso stated during his testimony that CIA
field stations worldwide were alerted to the Agency's
investigation "and the key stations were receiving
tips on the case, most of which were phony. We did not
send out instructions saying everybody participate in
the investigation."
(Ibid. p. 135.)
It was his
• recollection, however
that throughout his tenure as
Mexico traine
coordinator of the Agency's investigation, the Mexico
City Station was the only CIA
field station directly
unit
Footnote
continued from bottom of page 4.
I knew that we fat CIA did not have the
basic responsibility for investigating the
assassination of the President.
If there was
a crime commited in the course
of this activity,
(sic) it belonged to the FBI. I recognized that
it was our responsibility to give the fullest
cooperation to the FBI to protect the Agency
with regard to any aspects of our operations,
you understand, and at the same time giving them
cooperation, and Iwas in close contact with Mr.
Sam Papich {of the FBI, and always fully co-
operated,
and he always fully cooperated with me.
(Ibid. p. 52.)
This
noted that his office (CI/SIG) at the direction of
the Chief of Counterintelligence, James Angleton, was
designated the central point for collection of assassination-
related information made available to the FBI. (Ibid. pp. 52-53.
Classification:
2060573
000013
Classied By derivation
derivation:
---
## Page 16
ErassifieatigA: -
SECRET
According
othe
Agency,
an animations..
Subsequently,
this
immediately,
pursue
other
investigative
13
involved in investigatory, activities
related to President
Kennedy's assassination
(Tbia? / 34
(27) During the latter haft of December, scelso
issued a summary report which described Oswald's
activities in Mexico City from September 26, 1963 -
October 3, 1963.
Scelso characterized the summary report
as incomplete by comparison to assassination-related
information
then available to the FBI but not provided
to CIA until late Dec. 1963.
(Ibia. PP. 11A-drs.)
(CIA
Document Report by John Scelso to C/CI
DeC. 63.1**
(28)
Following issuance of this report, Helms shifted
responsibility for the CIA's investigation of President
Kennedy's
assassination-to-the=Counterintelligence
Staff.
HSCA Classified Deposition of John Scelso
5/16/78, p. 136, ef. HSCA Classified Deposition of
Raymond Rocca, 7/17/78, P. 15 wherein Rocca states that
responsibility shifted from Scelso to CI Staff on
политов та Рітак
January 12, 1964)
Helms testified that this shift in
/S.
* SHA the CIA
"does wit
agree
all of its branche
ten of its station
** Approximately two days after President Kennedy's
assassination, Scelso prepared a summary report,
provided to President Johnson by helms.
This report
adopted the position that Oswald probably was a lone
assassin who had no visible ties to Soviet or Cuban
intelligence though such ties could not be excluded
from consign
House fol-Get Con
assication:
Peps. of ToB61890090014
20.0510
Elasified By
dertvation
014738
Jerivation
---
## Page 17
7
ElassificatisA:
SECRET
This form in to be t man a
controlled
responsibility was a logical development because the
investigation had begun to take on broader tones.
(Executive Session Testimony of Richard Helms, 8/9/78,
p. 14, see also HSCA Classified Deposition of John
Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 138.)
(29)
Helms reasoning was expanded upon by Raymond
Rocca
who testified before the Committee that the
shift in responsibility described by Helms was caused
in part by the establishment of the Warren Commission
7/17/78
(HSCA Classified Deposition of Raymond Rocca, pp. 12-13.)
Rocca
added:
30
It was entirely appropriate in the
GPFLOOR phase that he (Scelso) would
have that (responsibility for the Agency
investigation.)
But the minute you had
a commission set up outside the line
obviously had to be the Director, and from
the Director to his Chief of Operations
overseas, because the spread involved
then all
of the divisions. Here you had
Mr. (Scelso) being asked to sign off on
cables that had to do with the Netherlands,
with U.K., with Australia, and it would
have seemed to me utterly administratively
simply-g-hybrid-monster.HSCA Classified
Deposition of R. Rocca, 7/17/78, p. 120)
(31)
spread
James Angleton supported Rocca's belief that "the
(of investigative responsibility) involved...
chief of the counterintelligene staff,
15022
• 18
000015
20(0511
Classified by derivatioti:
---
## Page 18
A classified stefl ryant desting explicitly
with
thee semitive roune and methods
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR
RELEASE OF THIG DOCUMENT
---
## Page 19
8
ClassifiestA: —
extracted
all of the (CIA divisions." Angleton testifed
to this Committee that the Agency's efforts to
gather and coordinate information related to
the assassination underwent a metamorphic
transition. Initially, Angleton noted, the
Director, Deputy Director, Division Chiefs and
Case Officers approached Warren Commission.
requirements in a piecemeal fashion. However,
Angleton
testified the Agency was eventually
able to focus its resources to avoid duplication
of effort and provide a system for the central
referencing of assassination related information
as such information was developed.
MASCA
Classified Deposition of James Angleton,
10/5/78, pp. 76-77, see also HSCA Classified
Deposition of Raymond Rocca, 7/17/78,
p. 23.)
safet
Classification:
000016
206092
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 20
ElassifiestigA: =
i SECRET
from SAcontrolled documents:
(32
The record reveals that during this second phase
of CIA information collection efforts in support of
the Warren Commission investigation the concentration
of Agency resources shifted in emphasis from exploration
of Oswald's activities in Mexico City to his residency
in the Soviet Union during 1959-1962 and possible
association with the Soviet intelligence apparatus.@ segPa.ff)
(Ibia., pp. 32-33,44, Executive Session of Testimony
Richard Helms, 8/9/78, p. 23.
Accordingig, Rocca commented
that during this phase
primary interest in support of the
Argue
Warren Commission was to
follow-up on Soviet leads g
on the assumption that a person who spends
four years*fin the Soviet Union, under his
circumstances, had to be of specific interest
to Soviet State security and their collateral
authorities. MascA Classified Deposition of
Raymond Rocca, PP. 32-33.1 6SEEp 9& for ty
(13)
Therefore,Rocca concluded, the areas the CIA tended
to concentrate on concerned the Soviets:
Go topi-/ofe continuation of text
*In fact, dwill wrent the years, eight months!
in the Souiet Union.
PET
000017
2000920
Elasified by derivation:
---
## Page 21
9a
Classification: -
SECRET
This gi witt
(is ferm is te be used for material entrasted
04 pill.
From ElA centrelled documents.
*The following exchange between Mr. Rocca and Committee
counsel sheds, further light on the difficulties encountered
by the Agency.
"reLated torts investigation of possible
Cuban involvement in the assassination:
Mr. Goldsmith. Earlier, when I asked you which
areas of the case received emphasis, I believe that you
indicated that on balance the primary area of emphasis
was the Soviet connection.
Mr. Rocca.
That was certainly the one that I would
say dominated - looking at it from my point of view.
Mr. Goldsmith. Now, had you known about the anti-
Castro
assassination plots
on the part of the CIA, would
you have given more priority, more emphasis, to the
possibility of a Castro conspiracy to kill the President?
Mr. Rocca.
Again, I say that it would have
simply intensified it, that there was attention given
to it, not particularly by the staff. I had no capabilities
on the Cuban side.
The organization of their service and their
operation in Mexico was something entirely entirely (sic)
within - it was an enigma at the time.
They were just
getting started.
This was Wils area.
This was in LAgnin
copiece
Scotes area of
So the defectors had only
begun to come out and they,
defectors.
ame out later, the Cuban
Agencie Gunpone te
So, I can't - I really can't say that (a)
the
Cuban connection was ignored, because it wasn't. The
press was filled with it at the time.
The Harker interview should have been undoubtedly
given greater attention in a generalized sense; but it
was given specific attention, I was told at the time of
the Rockefeller thing.
Mr. Goldsmith. In what way was the Cuban connection
investigated?
Mr. Rocca. I don't know.
I don't know this.
That side of the report strikes me as being inadequate.
Crassification:
000018
2060636
Classified by
derivation:
Classified
by
derivation:
---
## Page 22
- 9b -
Elassification: -
SECRET
(his form is 18 be used for material exisaated
178m ElA centralled decurents)
Mr. Goldsmith. Well, when I said to what extent
was the Cuban connection investigated, I don't mean by
the Warren Commission. I mean to what extent did the
Agency provide
Mr. Rocca. That I can't answer. I certainly
didn't, do it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Pardon me?
MI. Rocca. We certainly didn't, in R & A.
Mr. Goldsmith. So, CI/R & A did not --
Mr. Rocca. Go into the Cuban side of it at all.
This was something left to the people who were concerned
specifically with Cuban intelligence and security operation.
Mr. Goldsmith. But I believe earlier we
established that Mr. Helms gave orders that information
pertinent to the assassination was to go through your
office, correct?
Mr. Rocca.
Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. And once information pertinent
to the assassination went through your office, I take (it)
you or Mr. Helms would decide what information would
be relevant for the Warren Commission to see.
Is that correct?
Mr. Rocca. Well =
Mr. Goldsmith. Based upon what you knew?
Mr. Rocca. Well, everything would go, yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Therefore, you were in the
position, it would seem, to know what information was
being generated in the field that was going to the
Warren Commission.
Earlier I asked you which area received emphasis
and I believe you indicated that the
Soviet area (did).
SE
Elassificati8R: =
000013
2050837
Cassitled by derivation:
Classified
by derivation:
---
## Page 23
Elassificatien: sec
urais form is to be used for material exterated
from ElA centralled decuments:y
Mr. Rocca. Primarily, primarily.
But I didn't
mean by that that it excluded the Cuban, because there
was a lot of material that came through and went to the
Commission that concerned the Cubans.
Mr. Goldsmith. Let's go off the record.
(Discussion off the record.)
Mr. Goldsmith. Let's continue.
Mr. Rocca. My recollection is that at the time
the great press
manifestation was that Cuban exiles who
were in touch with CIA had been somehow involved in this.
This was the great concern.
Mr. Goldsmith. That's another possibility.
There are different -
CApering tigerabout
MI. Rocca. Questions went down to WH:
have anybody who could possibly have gotten involved in
this kind of thing.
There was extraordinary diligence, I thought,
exercised to try to clarify that side.
Mr. Goldsmith.
Do you think that the possibility
of an assassination plot by
Castro against the President
was adequately investigated?
(Pause)
Mr. Rocca.
With the advantages of 20-20 hind-
sight, I could say probably not.
But at the time it seems
to me
that they gave due attention to it - within the
information that I had at my disposal.
Goes mo?
9
**In fact,
(October
HO spent 2 years, 8 months in the Soviet Union
1959 - June 19621
ElassificatisA:
009020
20.0633
Classitied by derivation:
Classified
derivation:
---
## Page 24
Elassification: -
10a -
SECRET
This form is i be mee me materia eaten
f78PA ElA— EgRiFalled scuments:)
Oswald... (Angleton, p.
86) estated for the record
with rega
roto the Warren Commission's investigation
praise?
(with the CIA's support) of possible Cuban involvement i
in the assassination:
(38)
I personally believe that the United
inadequate.
a i A
States intelligence services did not
have the capabilities to ever come to
an adjudication (of the Cuban aspect) •
27
I don't think the capabilities were there.
(ASCA ClassIlled Deposition of James Angleton,
10/5/78
p. 93)
Trid
Chock-tis page i
comforte
Elassification:
000022
2000610
Easified by derivation:
---
## Page 25
Elassification:
11-
¿This f8rm is 18 be ysed per material extracted
(39)
As noted above, the CI Staff assumed responsibility
in late December 1963 - early January 1964 for the
coordination of CIA efforts to assist the Warren
Commission in its investigation. At that time, Raymond
Rocca,
Chief of Research and Analysis for CI Staff»
was designated point of contact with the warren
Commission®
(sch chases sied deposition ve semes
Angleton, 10/5/98, D. 17.1
Rocca's Research and
Analysis component was concerned with:
(40)
"analytical intelligence, analytical
brainpower, which meant all source, all
overt source comprehension; a study of
cases that had ceased to occupy opera-
tional significance, that is, closed cases,
to maintain the ongoing record of overall
quality and quantity of counterintelligence
being performed by the entire DDP operational
component; the Deputy Director foF Plant
7/17778 assified Deposition of B.
Rocca
See also HSCA Classified Deposition
of James Angleton, 10/5/78, p. 77.):
(41)
Mr. Rocca testified that assassination-related
information generated by CIA components was directed
to his staff (as designated point of contact with the
Warren Commission) in the normal flow of day to day
000023
Elassification:
20:0621
derivation:
derivation:
---
## Page 26
- 12
This form is to be
used for materia extracted
•cument:
work (Fbid., pp. 16-17.) This information was then
reviewed by Rocca or his
assistants who included LAjen eggi
Empirigh
Thomas-Hatt, (Soviet Expert), Paul Hartman
(general
research and search man for the U.S. Intelligence
Community and its resourcesif, and liar Deoley
Deoley twho
had transferred to the CIA from the FBI a number of
years prior to the assassination) (Ibid. p. 17.)
During the course of the Warren Commission investi-
gation, Hall Hartman and Dooley worked with those
that deser
CIA divisions producing substantive information
related to the assassination
(Ibid.)
(42)
Mr. Rocca testified that
even though
CI/R&A was the Agency's point of reference with regard
to the Warren Commission, neither his staff nor the
CI staff in general displaced the direct relations of
Mr. Helms or any other concerned Agency official with
the Warren Commission
MIbid.; Rocca testified that neither
CI Staff nor his staff displaced the CIA's Soviet
Division (represented by David Murphy, Chief of the
000024
Alassification: -
2060625
Elasified By derivation:
---
## Page 27
13
Classification: -
"This form is 18 be used dor material extrated
33
SR division and his assistant, Tennant Bagley) in
Its contact with the Commission; nor did CI/R&A
displace John Scelso in his contact with the Warren
Commission.
Rocca testified that in some instances
indicated
J. Lee Rankin of the Warren Commission would go directly
to Helms with requests, and in other instances David
Slawson, a Commission Staff counsel, conferred directly
with Tom fair of Rocca's staff.
(Ibid. p. 363)
(43)
The record reveals that on certain issues of
particular sensitivity Rocca was not permitted to act
as the Agency's point of contact with the Warren Commission.
He testified that "compartmentalization was observed
notwithstanding the fact that I was the working level
point of contact.
(HSCA Classified Deposition of Raymond
34
* Although James Angleton functioned as Rocca's direct
superior during the course of the Warren Commission
investigation, he did not participate on a regular
basis in the Agency's efforts to supply substantive
IT/ liaised information to the Warren commission nor did he deal our saline
on a direct basis with Warren Commission representa
tives. (excepting Allen Dulles on an unofficial basis;
p. 17-181 HECA Classified Deposition of James
10/5/78, P. 782) However, Angleton testified to this
need etassified Deposition of Raymond Rocca, Angleton?, Houseletcon
(JFK +98
Paci
0101720)
Committee that he did attempt to keep apprised of
developments as the investigation progressed through
consultation with Rocca. (HSCA Classified Deposition of
James Angreton, 10/5/78, p. 81)
, p81)
Classification:
000625
20:0625
assifted
lassitied
2y derivation:
ay derivation:
---
## Page 28
"This form is to be used for material extranted
fF8m ElA cantrailed documents+)
35
Rocca, 8/17/78, p. 18)
occa cited by way of example
the case of the Soviet defector Nosenko. Rocca
testified that he did not attend any of the Agency
=30
discussions pertaining to Nosenko's case
Ibid.)
Rather,
fas it affected the Warren Commission investi-
gation! responsibility for the Nosenko caselwas
assigned to batta manpay,
Chierof
SR Division, in
addition to Richard Helms. (Ibid)
37
(44)
Rocca described the CI staff mail intercept program,
HTLINGUAL, as a second example of an Agency matter
about which he had no knowledge nor input.visavi
38
the Agency's support tale to the warred Commission.
(Ibid., pp. 19-20. Rather, James Angleton and-
the Prippingen
31
handled the disposition of this particular,
material
(HSCA Classified Deposition of J. Scelso,
5/16/78, P. 113, wherein Scelso states that CI Staff
including
was: repository of HILINGUAL intercepts;
but see NSCA Class Dep. of
7/20/78
warren commission
states that he did not o/78, Pineer
to provide
the HT WINSuAn program.
Classificati®A:
20:062?
000026
derivation:
Classified by deriation:
---
## Page 29
Elassificatien: SECRET
(This farm is 18 be used for material
extrasted
(Y5)
In summary, it was Rocca's testimony that an internally
decentralized information reporting function best
40
characterized the organization of this second phase
of the Agency's investigative efforts to assist
the Warren Commission,
(Fbid., p. '10; HSCA Classified
Deposition of James Angleton, 10/5/78, p. 75, 80.
See
also CIA Doc. Rocca Memo for Record, 1 April 1975,
Subject: Conversation with David W. Belin, April 1,
o 1978,
wherein it is stated that Helms remained senior
official in charge of the overall investigation,
with CI staff acting as a coordinator and repository
of information collected.)
552.
Elassification:
000027
26:0623
der yatior
Classiffed By derivatior
---
## Page 30
ClassificatisA:
See
ret
used for material extracted
from
controlled
rocuments
trom
-controlled
ocuments
Il The Warren Com Sion =2iA Working Relatzerstr
A. Opinions of Warren Commission and CIA Representatives
Regarding Warren Commission-CIA Relationship
(46)
The Committee has contacted both representatives of
the Warren Commission staff and those representatives of
the CIA who played significant roles in providing CIA-
generated information to the Warren Commission. The
general consensus of these representatives is that the
41
Warren Commission and the CIA enjoyed a successful
working relationship during the course of the Commission's
investigation. (HSCA Class. Depo. Of R. Rocca 7/17/78,
p. 18) (See also Exec. Sess. Test. of Richard Helms,
8/9/78, 5p1,24. ) William Coleman, a senior staff counsel
for the Warren Commission who worked closely with Warren
Commission staff counsel W. David Slawson on matters
which utilized the CIA's resources, characterized
the CIA representatives with whom he dealt as
•..
highly competent, cooperative, and intelligent.
(See HSCA staff interview of William Coleman,
8/2/78
Mr. Slawson expressed a similar opinion
regarding the Agency's cooperation and quality
000028
2000517
Elasified By derivation:
Ce Berk
---
## Page 31
Lassification
lassitication
Secre
(This form is to be used for material
extracted
trom Cram controlled 488umeht haterial
extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
-10-
43
of work.
(Executive Session Testimony of W.
David Slawson, 11/15/77, P. 17isee also JFK
Exhibit 23.)
(47)J. Lee Rankin, General Counsel for the
Warren Comnission, testified that the Warren
Commission and its staff were assured by the CIA
that the Agency would cooperate in the Commissi
work
(HSCA Class. Depo. of J. Lee Rankin,
8/7/78, p.4; HSCA Class. Depo. of John McCone,
8/17/78, p. 9)
John McCone, Director of Central Intelligence
at the time of President Kennedy's assassination
and during the Warren Commission investigation,
supported Mr. Rankin's testimony in this regard
by characterizing the CIA's work vis-a-vis
the Warren Commission-as both responsive and
comprehensive
(SCA Class. Depo. of John
McCone, 8/17/78, p. 5)
Mr. McCone was responsible
for ensuring that all relevant matters were
see yellow pad changes
44
000029
Le lat
20:0513
Clessified by derivation:
C. Berk
---
## Page 32
assurication
assitication
(This form is to be used for material
extracted
tols carm confPoiled ysecuments aterial
extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
-10a-
(49)
conveyed by the
SIA
the Warren Commission.
(Ibid., pp. 5=6))
In this regard, Mr. McCone
testified that:
The policy of the CIA was to give the Warren
Commission everything that we had. I
personally asked Chief Justice Warren to
come to my office and took him down to the
vault of our building where our information
is
microfilmed and stored and showed him the
procedures that we were following and the
extent to which we were giving him - giving
his staff everything that we had, and arthr
he was quite satisfied.
(Ibia., p.9)-
47
(50)
Materials Be Made Promptly Available By
CIA To Warren Commission
(51)
Mr. Raymond Rocca, • fis daninglerdinnerter of ClA
the Warren Commission
investigation,
characterized the Agency's role as one of
full support to the Warren Commission. Mr.
Rocca, who served as the Chief of the Research and
009030
@tessifliction:_
2060513
Classified by derivation:
Berk
---
## Page 33
Classification: -
Seer
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
trons dieta contpolled dedurentsnaterial extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
-10b
Analysis Divison for the Counter-Intelligence
Staff of the CIA, stated under oath that
Richard Helms had given the following
directive:
52) 11 material bearing in anyway that
could be of assistance to the
Warren Commission should be seen by cIf
staff and R and A and marked for us.
He
issued very, very strictly worded
lastructions indications
-they were verbal in so
far as I know — that we were to leave no
stone unturned.
(ASCA Class. Depo. of Raymond Rocca,
7/17/78, p.
24)
118
000031
2000520
01%.-
cret
Elassified by derivation C. Berk
---
## Page 34
Classification: -
119
(53)
ME. ROCHAis afrAds thater used finchermlaraded Mr. Helms!
lers were followla to tole deters by all CIA employees.
Ibid. p. 24.
• Mr. Rocca concluded that on this basis:
was to turn over and to develop any information
bearing on the assassination that could be of assistance
to the Warren Conmission."
Ibia., p. 26.
(5x)
A different view of the CIA's role regarding the
supply of CIA's information to the Warren Commission was
propounded by Richard, Helms. Mr. Helms, who served as
the CIA's Deputy Director for Plans during the Warren
Commission investigation, was directly responsible for the
CIA's investigation of President Kennedy's assassination antthe
tablishment of ch
patiay visa ris the warren Commission.
(Ibid., p. 23
He testified to the Committee that the
CIA made every effort to be as responsive as possible too
Warren Commission requests
(Exec. Sess. Text. of Richard
Helms, 8/9/78, p. 10
• Helms added further testimony
regarding the manner in which the CIA provided its infor-
mation to the Warren Commission. He stated:
(55)
(56)
An inquiry would come over (from the Warren Com
mission).
We would attempt to respond to it.
But these inquiries came in individual bits and
pieces or as individual items...Each individual
item that came along we toot care of as best we
(Ibid., pp. 10-11
However, it was Mr. Helms' recollection that the CIA
provided information to the Warren Commission primarily
53
Classification:
SEEKET.
000032
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 35
Classification:
SECRET
on the basis dhither drut sits fos peterial extralests. Under
from ClA-controlled documents.)
oath he supported this proposition:
Mr. Goldsmith:
In summary, is it your position that
the Agency gave the Warren Commission
information only in response to speci-
fic requests by the Warren Commission?
Mr. Helms:
That is correct.
I want to modify that by saying that
memory is fallable.
There may have been
times or circumstances under which some-
thing different might have occured, but
my recollection is that we were attempting
to be-responsive and supportive to the
FBI and the Warren Commission. When
they asked for something we gave it to
• them.
As far as our volunteering information
is concerned, I have no recollection of
whether we volunteered it or not
(Ibid., p. 34
157)
Mr. Helms' characterization of fulfilling Warren
Commission requests on a caserbasis rather than uniformly
volunteering relevant information to the Warren Commission
stands in direct opposition to J. Lee Rankin's perception
of the CIA's investigative responsibility. MI. Rankin was
asked by Committee Counsel whether he worked under the
impression that the Agency's responsibility was simply to
respond to questions that were addressed to CIA by the
Warren Commission. In response, Mr. Rankin testified as
follows:
(58)
Not at all and if anybody had told me that I
would have
insisted that the Commission com-
municate with the President and get a different
arrangeclassificatione might not ask the right
SECRET
Classified by deridi0. 0 0 33
---
## Page 36
Classitication:
sectet
lassitication:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
Nots Cram toniPoled usseumehtshaterial extracted
trom ClA-controlled documents.
-13-
55
(59)
B
questions and then we would not have the
information and that would be absurd.
(HSCA Class. Depo. of J. Lee Rankin,
8/17/78, p. 4)
MI. Slawson added support to Rankin's position
testifying that Warren Commission requests to the CIA
were rarely specific. "The request was made initially
that they give us all information pertinent to the
assassination investigation.
J (Exec. Sess. Test. of
W. David Slawson, 11/15/77, p. 29)
CIA's faiter to Discles: 214 inti
Eutro Abusinatina pinine to Narcen
commission
56
(60)
in unfortunate consequence of partin donnission @liane a
trecia to provide tu
CIA mitirill isreflecrelii
the subsequent exposure of the CIA's anti-Castro
assassination plots LTSSC Book V) see also (Alleged
Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders, Interim
Report, SSC, 11/20/75)/.
aradoxiently, even if the
von had requested int
tior on such
The recordreveals that the
me CIA's point of contact with the
Warren
Commission
Khame be
o provide the
2030521
Camified by derivations
000034
C. Berk
---
## Page 37
Classification:
Secre
lassification:
(This form is to be used
I for material extracted
fretir denm iontrolted urseurtentsmaterial extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
-13a-
Comun
i Informatio
"SO" TEqueSted.As
MI/soca's testamony reveáls, sea no
knowledge at the time of the Warren Commission
investigation of Agency efforts to assassinate
Fidel Cástro.
CESCA Class Depo. of Raymona
Bocca,
7/17/78, p. 509
geep. 34
5
trailinastie
20.0522
000037
Classified by dermation: C. Berk
---
## Page 38
Classification:
SECRE
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from CIA - controlled documents.)
Had RoceT, as the CIA's working level representative
to the warren Comission, been requested by the
conmission to research and report on an
and all
dele
CIA ánti-Castro assassination operations, Rocca's
this welling sut
efforts would have produced no substantive informa-
tion. (Ibid., p. 497.
cate
(611
The record bed reve als that the CiA desk
officer who was initially given the responsibility
by Mr. Helms to investigate
Lee Harvey
Oswald, and the assassination of President Kennedy
had no knowledge of such plots during his investi-
sedical cation. (45cA C Dego 08 50m 566150. 5/16/78
pp. 73, 111-112)y Mr. Scelso testified that had he
rown of such assassination plots the following
action would have been taken:
662)
(63)
"We would have gone at that hot and heavy.
We would have queried the agent (AMIASH)
about it in great detail. I would have
had him polygraphed by the best operative
security had to see if he had (sic) been
a double-agent, informing Castro about
our poison pen things, and so on.
would have had all
our Cuban sources
queried about it."
(Ibid., p. 166)
4174445
As the record reflects,
these plots were known
by few within the CIA.
Mr. Helms' testimony regarding
00003
Classification:
SECRET
starse Seleet Comm
chu-
014720
*See also HSCA 0106526101
Deposition
. of James Angleton, 10/ 5/78,
pp.22 wherein Angleton states thut ned datiled by demaior store
toassusine Fider Gistro antir atro nesarinconnission da
---
## Page 39
emphasis
Classification:
53Y
ẾT
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
these plots reveals that the Agency compromised the policy of
its pirestor
Les promise to supply all relevant information to
(sEx statementot son Mutant, ploaherein)
the Warren Commission.
The following exchange
between
Comnittee Counsel and Mr. Helms illustrates
the
extent
Mr. Goldsmith:
¡of the Agency's compromise:
Mr. Helms, I take it from your
testimony
that your position is
that the anti-Castro plots, in
fact, were relevant to the
Warren Commission's work; and,
in light of that, the Committee
would like to be
informed as to
why the warren Commission was
not told by you of the anti-
Castro assassination plots.
Mr.
Helms:
I have never been asked to testify
before the Warren Commission about
our operations.
Mr. Goldsmith:
If the Warren Commission did not
know of the operation, it certainly
was not in a position to ask you
about it.
Is that not true?
Mr • Helms:
Yes, but how do you know they did
not know about it? How do you
know Mr. Dulles had not told them?
How was I to know that? And besides,
I was not the Director of the Agency
and in the CIA, you did not go
traipsing around to the Warren Com-
mission or to Congressional Committees
or to anyplace else without the
Director's permission.
Mr.
Goldsmith:
Did you ever discuss with the Director
whether the warren Commission
should be informed of the anti-Castro
assassination
lots?
Classification: S
Classified by derivation: 1 0 0.037
---
## Page 40
16
Classification: —
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA - controlled documents.)
Mr. Helms:
I dia note as far as I recall
AHSCA Exec.
Sess.
Test: or Richard
helms.
8/9/18, PP. 30-31-4, emphasis
Added,
Mr. McCone testifed that he first became aware
of the CIA's anti-Castro assassination plots
involving CIA-Mafia ties during August 1963. He
stated that upon learning of these plots he directed
that the. Agency cease all such activities.
(HSCA
Class. Depc. of John McCone, 8/17/78, P. 13)
When
asked whether the CIA desired to withold informa-
tion from the Warren Commission about the Agency anti-
Castro assassination plots to avoid embarrassing the
Agency or causing an international crises he gave
the following response:
"I cannot answer that since they (CIA
employees knowledgeable of the
continuance of such plots) withheld
the information from. me.
I cannot
answer that question. I have never
been satisfied as to why they with
held--the-information-from me..Ibid.
p. 16)
Regarding the relevancy of such plots to the
Warren Commission's work,. Warren Commission counsels
Rankin, Slawson and spector were in agreement that
such information should have been reported to the
U
660
677
Classification:
Classified by deriv B.0 0 38
---
## Page 41
Classification:.
SESSKETI
(This form
i seque dater petrial of fact de Runkin, 8/117/73,
from CIA -contrplpaidocentents.)
warren Commission. (Exec. Sess. Test. of w.
David Slawson, 11/15/77, p. 27; Exec. Sess. Test.
of Arlen Spector 11/8/77, pp. 45-46; CF, Exec.
Sess. Test. of Wesley Liebeler, 11/15/77, p. 71
where he states that possible witholding of
information by CIA about Agency attempts to
assassinate Castro did not significantly affect
Warren Commission- investigation)
From the CIAls-perspective, MI. Rocca
testified that had he known of the anti-Castro
assassination plots his efforts to explore the
possibility of a retaliatory assassination against
President Kennedy by Castro would have been intensi-
fied. He stated that: " a completely different
procedural approach probably would and should have
been taken." (HSCA Class. Depo. of Raymond Rocca
1/17/78, p. 45)
John Scelso, the above-cited CIA desk officer
who ran the CIA's initial investigation of President
Kennedy's assassination until that responsibility
was given to the CIA's counterintelligence staff,
offered a highly critical appraisal of Helms'
non-disclosure to the Warren Commission:
Classification: 55 fI
Classified by derivation:
0D0039
---
## Page 42
Classification: -
SEAT.
(This form is to be used for. material extracted
from ClA - controlled documents.)
Mr. Goldsmith:
Do you think Mr. Helms was
acting properly when he failed
to tell the Warren Commission
about the assassination plots?
Mr. Scelso:
No, I think that was a morally
highly reprehensible act, which
he cannot possibly justify under
his oath of office, or any
other standard of professional
public
ic service.
(HSCA Class.
Depo. of John Scelso, 5/16/78
170
II. D.
Lage: Respecsibi lisprotection
Agency Coneern/for the Sanctity
of Sensitive Sources and Methods - Factors Affecting
CIA Resporse to Warren Commission Requests
The length of time required by the CIA to
respond to the Warren Commission's requests for
information was dependent upon 1) the availability
of information;...
"2) the complexity of the issues
presented by the request and 3) the extent to which
the relevant information touched upon sensitive CIA
• -.
sources and methods. On
the first two points, Mr.
Helms testified that when CIA(had been) able to
satisfy a Commission request, the CIA would then send
a reply back:
mand some of these inquiries obviously
took longer than others.
For example, some might
avolve.
Classification: -
000040
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 43
defete
Unles
AY
in 1!
and wist,
Classitication: -
SERgEL
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
checking a file which was in washington.
Other inquiries might involve trying to
see if we could locate somebody in some
overseas country:
Obviously, one takes longer to per-
form than the other. Exec. Sess. Test
öf Richard Helms, 8/9/78, p. 20
At
Ines-ther
fals concern for protecting its
sensitive sources and methods caused the Warren
Commission to expérience greater difficulty in
getting relevant information than when the protec-
tion of such sources and methods was not at issue.
iOn Occasion,
J.
Lee rankin expressed the opinion that the Agency's
effort to protest it seare sources and ethods partieten
affectedthe guality of the information to which
the Warren Commission and its staff were given
access.
27-
p.
23)
(ASCA Class. Depo, of J. Lee Rankin 8/17/78,
"howeve,
As
a result of
the ChA-s Goneern, in
some instances
the Agency made
initially
Limit accessptO CIA Materials by the Commission
T73
(ASEA ClasS. De
Depo. Of John Scelso, 5/16/78, P. 158)
The Committee has identified two areas of
concern in which the Agency's desire to protect Its
sensitive sources and methoas pelickthe fazen
Commission's investigation. These are:
Classification:
Đ00041
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 44
Initially
Classification: -
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.).
cal sover materals
witholding information from the warren
Commission
Oswald's trip
pertaining to the photo-
se refia litta telephonio surveillance
operations of the CIA's Mexico City Station
2) As a related consideration, the Agency's relucter.
Gity Myste
Man dev
CAsInitial Concern
for Revealing
Sensitive Sources intMetroils
The CIA's concern for revealing the existence
soure and methods
of sensitive technioal operations
as outlined abover
evident from the inception of the Warren Commission.
Mr •
Scelso commented that "we
were
not authorized
[semitive
at first to reveal all our
(technica) operations."
(Ibid., p. 158)
But Scelso did testify that:
We were going
to give them intelligence
reports which derived from all our sources,
including technieel sources, including the
telephone intersept and the information
gotten from the interrogation of Silvia
Duran, for example, which corresponded
75
almost exactly with the information from
the telephone intercepts. Fbid. )
Mr: Scelsco's characterization is supported by
examination of the background to the first major CIA
report furnished the Warren Commission regarding
Classification: -
-==277
000042,
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 45
Classitication: -
SECREL
This. form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
Lee Harvey Oswald's trip to Mexico City.
ICIA
DOC: FOIA #509-803, 1/31/64/ Memorandum for J.
Lee Pankin from Richard Helms) Much of the
information provided to the Warren Commission
in this report was based upon sensitive sources
and methods, identification of which had been
deleted completely from the report.
The CIA policy limiting Warren Commission
knowledge of CIA sources and methods was articu-
sensitie dance
and merited)
lated as early as December 20, 1963, at which
time a cable was sent from CIA headquarters to
the Mexico City Station which stated:
Our present plan in passing information
to the Warren Commission is to eliminate
mention Oftelephone taps, in order to
protect your continuing ops.
Will rely
instead on statements of Silvia Duran
and on contents of
which Soviets gave oXeet fonsular file
(CIA DOCHFOIA
#420-75712/20/63 Dir 90466) %
The basic policy articulated in the December
20, 1963 cablenis also set forth in a CIA memorandum
of December 10, 1963 as it specifically concerned
the CIA's relations with the FBI.
-CIA Memorandum
for File, 12/20/63,
included in with Soft
file materials)
In that memorandum,
C'A employer
of the CIA Counterintelligence/Special Investigations
Group StElassification e had bell advised by san.
Classified by derivation:
000043
---
## Page 46
SECRET
Classification: -
(This form is to be used for material extracted
Papich, FBforhialÁseonttaledblecutents.) that the FBI was
anticipating a reguest from the Warren Commission
for copies of the FBI's materials which supported
or complimented the FBI's five volume report of
December 9, 1963 that had been submitted to the
Warren Comnission. Papich provided
with
this report which indicated that some United
States Agency was lept tetepfores in Mexico
and asked him whether the FBI could supply the
this operettan.
Warren Commission with the source of the telephone
7[Ammemorandum shows that he discussed
this matter with Scelso. After a discussion
with Helms, Scelso was directed by Helms to prepare
CIA material to be passed to the Warren Commission.
wrote
made..
the fallowing it-latio
regarding
SECRAT
000044
Classification:
Classified by derivation: -
40474
---
## Page 47
ok
SECRET
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
He (Scelso) was quite sure it was not
the Agency's desire to make available
Gensitive
source
to the Commission at least in this
manner-via the FBI-sensitive informa-
tion which could relate to telephone
taps. CIA Memo for File, 12/20/63, by
included in Soft File
materials)*
cap/hond other
wish card
-.O!
The opinion expressed by Scelso as of December
20, 1963 was set forth on January 14, 1964 in a
formalized fashion, When Helms expressed his
concern regarding exposure by the FBI of Agency
sources to the Warren Commission.
Helms wrote
that the CIA had become aware that the FBI had
already:
called to the attention of the
Commission, through its attorney,
that we have information [las deter-.
mined from Agency sources) coinciding
with the dates when Oswald
was in Mexico
City and which may have some bearing
on his activities while in that area.
CIA # CSCI 377797
#66 4/74-191
Mr. Helms further indicated that the CIA might
be called upon to provide additional information
acquired from checks of CIA records and
agency
sources. He suggested that certain policies be
employed to enable CIA to work cooperatively
with the Commission in a manner which would
protect CIA information, sources and methods.
Among the policies articulated were two which
Helms claimed would enable the Agency to control
the flow of Agency originated information.
In
this way the CIA could check the possibility of
revealing its sources and methods inadvertantly.
The policies articulated were:
SECRAT
Classification:
000045
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 48
ok
S/24
dinaris: 05
Classification:
CIA HAS NO CBJECTION TO
DECLASSIFIGATION AND/OR
(This form is to be used for material extracted
RELEASE OF THIS DOGUMENT
from ClA-controlled documents.)
The CIA policy of eliminating reference
to Agency
sensitive sources and methods is further revealed
by examination of an Agency cable, dated January 29,
1964, sent from CIA Headquarters to the CIA Mexieo
citystation: fICIA DOC. FOIA 7398-204, 1/29/60
DIR 97829)
This cable indicated that knowledge of
Agency sources "and techniques was still being with-
held from the Warren Commission, and stated that on
Saturday, February 1, 1964, the CIA was to present
a report on Oswald's Mexico City activities to the
80
Warren Commission which would be in a form
protective of the CIA's Mexico City Station's
sources and techniques?
(Ibid.).
78/
(Footnote cont'a from pg. 23.)
1) Your Bureau not disseminate information re-
ceived from this Agency without prior concur-
rence
2) In instances in which this Agency has provided
information to your Bureau and you consider
that information is pertinent to the Conmission's
interest, and/or compliments (sich or otherwise
is pertinent to information developed or
received by your Bureau through other sources
and is being provided by you to the Commission,
you refer the Commission to this Agency.
In
such cases it will be appreciated if you will
advise us of such referral, in order that we may
anticapate. the
possible denture interest of the furle
commis
prasaratory steps to
meeting its needs. (Ibid. jack.
Classified by derivation:
00046
---
## Page 49
A3/075
125- dest
dance 22:26
Classification:.
(This form is to be used for materia! extracted
from ClA controlled documents.)
Telephone Taps
Mr. Helms offered testimony regarding the CIA's
reticence to inform the Warren Commission, at least
during. the initial stage of the Commission's work,
of the CIA's telephonic and photo surveillance
operations in Mexico City.
The reason for the sensitivity of these
telephone.taps.and surveillance-was not
only becuase it was sensitive from the
Agency's standpoint, but the telephone
taps were cunningn conjunction with
the Mexican authorities and therefore,
if this had become public knowledge,
it would have caused very bad feelings
between Mexico and the Unitedstates.
and that was the reason (Exec.
Sess.
Test. of Richard Helms, 8/9/78, pp. 51-52.
The CIA's unwillingness to inform the Warren
commission in the early stages of its investigation
of the above-described surveillánce operations is
a source, of concern to this committee. It is
indicative of an Agency policy designed to skew
In its favor the form and substance of information
the CIA felt uncomfortable providing the warren
Commission. (HSCA Class. Depo. of John Scelso,
5/6/78, p. 158) This process might well have
hampered the Commission's ability to proceed in
8
Classification:
000047
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 50
8
ol.
- 26
SECKZL
Classification:
its investion on ontole d
material extracted
before it.
As noted previously, on January 31, 1964,
the CIA provided the Warren Commission with a
83
7921
memorandum that chronicled Lee Harvey Oswald
Mexico City visit during September 26,71963
October 3, 1963.
That memoranduded not mentionan old tai
is coin!?
that Oswald's various conversations with the Cuban
in Mexico,
and Soviet Embassy/Consulates had been tapped and
by the Agency's Mexico City Station
subsequently transcribed?
Furthermore, that memo-
randum did not mention that the CIA had tapped
and transcribed conversations between Cuban Embassy
employee Sylvia Duran and Soviet officials at the
Soviet Embassy/Consulate
nor was mention madé of
the conversations between cuban President. Dórticos
and Cubán Ambassador to Mexico Armas which the CIA
had also tapped and transcribed.)
On February 1, 1964, Helms appeared before the
Many hase
Cormission and Hikely discussed che memorandum of
3
January 31, 1964. SicIa: DOC. FOIA 7498-204, 1/25/641
DIR 97829)
On
February TO 964 Lee Rankin wrote
Helns in regard to
the CIA memorandum of January 31.
(JFK DOC. NO. 3872
A review of Rankin's letter
delete
8Y
Classification:
SECRET
000048
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 51
senditive
-
Classification: -
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
indicates that as of his writing, the Warrer
internatase 0.222
ommission had no substantire knowledge of th
sensitive
arce emeter that had nethe
telephonie surveillance uperation or the production
the, formed Onscripts from that operation.
Rankin inquired in the February 10, 1964 letter
whether Oswald's direct communication with employees
of the Soviet Embassy (as stated in Paragraph 1
of January 31 memorandum) had been facilitated by Millar
lephone
terview. Manifestly, had the Warren
senife sonia died
Commission
been informed of the telephonic
surveillance operation and its suecess in tapping
swald, this inquiry by Rankin would not have been
made.
Raymond Rocca's testimony tends to support
this conclusion. It was Rocca's recollection that
between the time period of January 1964 - April 1964,
Warren Commission's representatives had visited the
CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virginia and had
been shown various Mauseripes resulting from the
CIA Elephonies ance operations in Mexico
City •
(ESCA Class. Depo. of Raymond Rocca,
7/17
p. 39)
However, Mr. Rocca did not personally make
86
Classification:
Classified by derivation:
000049
---
## Page 52
28
Classification: -
SEGRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
this material available to Commission representa-
tives and was not able to state under oath
precisely the point in time at which the Warren
Commission first learned of these operations. (Ibid.)
87
83
On February 19, 1964 the CIA responded to
( CD 384, FOLA NO: 553-80814
Rankin's inquiry of February
10. The Agency
response did indicate that Oswald had phoned the
Soviet Consulate and was also interviewed at the
still disl
not reveal
Consulate. However, the Agency
neither revealed
the source of this information, in its response to
the Commission nor indicated that this source
would be revealed by other means fe.g. by ofal
briefing)
(Ibia
188
densitive Optiotising
Warren Commission Knowledge of CIA Telephonic Surveillance
During the period of March - April 1964,
David Slawson drafted a series of memoranda which
among other issues concerned Warren Commission know-
ledge of and access to the production material
sensitive
operations
derived from the CIA telephonie surveillance operations
• in Mexico City. A review of these memoranda tends
to support the Committee's belief that the warren
Commission, through Mssrs. Slawson, Coleman, and
Classification:
Classified by derivation:
000050
---
## Page 53
Corich.
Classification:
SECRET
iginalsonnes
and willer thisalemdttoobta decegerial restedelephonic
Duca
from ClA - controlled documents.)
surveillance materials until April 9, 1964. On
that date, Coleman,
Slawson and Willens met with
Win scott, the CIA"s eniero eulathen Mexico
raw data
city, who provided them with various transeripts
and translations derived from A teteprenticaps
of the Cuban and Soviet-Embassy/Consulates A slawson
Memorandum of April 22, 1964, Subject: Trip to
Mexico City p22)
perman
-PriOrto April 9, it appears doubtful that
the Commission had been given even ire tel
access,
to thel referenced material. Nevertheless, by March
12, 1964, the record indicates that the Warren
Commission had at least become aware that the CIA.
9
did maintain telephonic surveillance of the cuban
21440601
Embassy/Consulate. (Slawson merorandum, March 12,
(1964, Subj: meeting with CIA representatives) .
Slawson's memorandum of March 12 reveals that. the Warren
reporter
Commission had learned that the CIA possessed tran- inforte
scripte of conversations between the Cuban Ambassadol
al to Mexico, Armas, and the Cuban President Dorticos
The
91
Dorticos-Armas conversations, requested by the Marrer
whichihadbeen summarized inthe
T(31/01)
A DO FAN # 509-803,
whilein
Classification:
ECRET
# Slawson
sten inter drenche
this Committee
stated that me be came aware of the exis classified by derivation:
000051
16:p
citi
andis
sCre
dur
lister
---
## Page 54
SECRET:
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
AMAS O CSJECTION TO
DEGLASSIFICATION AND/OR
from ClA-controlled documeite Marita
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUME
Commission representatives at nitting; with
CIA officials, including Richard Helms, concerned
Silvia Duran's arrest and interrogation by the
9z
Mexican Federal Police.
•(Slawson Memorandam
April 22, 1964, pp. 3, 19, 45-46)S Helms responded
to the Commission's request for access, stating
that he would attempt to arrange for the Warren
cornission's representatives to review this material. 93
(Slawson Memorandum of March 12, 1964, p. 6)°
Another Slawson memorandum, dated March 25,
1964 concerned Oswald's trip to Mexico. In that memo
Slawson wrote that the tentative conclusions
he had reached concerning Oswald's Mexico trip,
were derived from CIA memoranda of January 31, 1964
anc. February 19, 1964, (Slawson Memorandum of March
25, 1964, p. 20) and, in addition, a Mexican federal
police summary of interrogationsconducted shortly-
after the assassinationwith -
5010a Durant teet
Slawson wrote:
large part of it (the summary report)
is simply a summation of what the Mexican
police learned when they interrogated Mrs.
Silvia Duran, an employee of the Cuban
Consulate in Mexico City, and is there-
fore only as accurata as
puran's
testimony to the police.
Ibid.
95
SECRET
Classification:
Classified by derivation:0000-52
---
## Page 55
31
Classification:
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
These comments indicate that Slawson placed
qualified reliance upon the Mexican police summary.
Moreover, there is no indication that Slawson had
raw data
been provided the Duran telephonie in
creept
betion obtained by meand of
scripts.
In fact, by virtue of Slawson's comments
concerning the Mexican police report, it would
appear that the Warren Commission, as of March 25,
had been provided little substantive information
sensitate
C.A
duurch.
and
methis.
pertaining to Silvia Duran. As Slawson reveals,
the Commission had been forced to rely upon the two
sensitive
memoranda that did not make reference to the surveil-
lance operations and a sunnary report issued by
the Mexican Federal Police. Thus, the Agency had
for over three months Prelude exposing
nau sato estate pes on tected analisis
concerned Warren Commission staff members.
As was
3 ok
stated in the CIA cable of December 20, 196f to its
Mexico City Station:
Our present plan in passing information
[sensitie
spiratisan
to the Warren Commission is
to eliminate
nention of'erephone caps, in order to
protect your continuing operatons.
will
rely instead on statements of Silvia
Duran and on contents of Soviet consular
file which soviets gave eDACID here.
TCIA DOC. FOIA #420-757, DEC.
: 20, 1964,3
Got An
- A DIR 90466)
ol
State Deft
SECRET
state Deputie.
9 80
Classification:
Classified by derivatid 0 9 053
---
## Page 56
SECRET
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
Naw data
from CIA - controlled documents.)
parteining
jurain
The Committee's belief that Slawson had
that
not been given access to the Duran transcripts is
further supported by reference to his memorandum
of March 27, 1964 (eb 092) wherein he states his
C14!
conclusion that Oswald had visited the Cuban
of Embassy on three occasions.
(Ibid, pr?)
This
again
conclusion, he wrote, was based upon an analysis of
Silvia Duran's testimony before the Mexican police.
This memorandum bears
no indication that he had
reviewed any of the Duran transtlipts. Furthermore,
had Slawson been given access to these transcripts,
certainly their substance would have been incorporated
into Kis analysis and accordingly noted for this
purpose.
His analysis would have reflected the fact
of his review either by its corroboratión or
criticism of the above cited Mexican police summary report.
Logically, access to the CIAl telephonic
delete surveir mee odictor would hare clarifige some
ambiguities.
For example, on september 27, at 4:05 p.m.
(Slawson Memorandam of April 21, 1964, Subj: Intereepts
from Soviet and Cuban Embassies in Mexico, P. 2) puts..a
encotsentence
SECRZT
Classification:
000054
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 57
Classification:
SECRET
silvia duraris therhoned the priderabad and
stated that a/Amertille dos esently at the
Cuban Embas:
Sy requesting an
in-transit visit to
Cuba. Thas American was later determined by CIA analysts
to be Oswald.
/Again on september 28,
at 11:51 a.m.
Duran telepkoned the
Soviet Consulate stating that
an American, subseqdently identified by CIA analysts
as Oswald was at the Cuban Embassy:
corrob sting stage visit are Cuten Embassy
Had this information been made available to Slawson,
his calculatións of Oswald's activities in Mexico
city would have been
more
firmly established than
they were as of March 27, 1964.
The record supports the Committee's finding
that as of April 2, 1964 the Warren Commission had
till not been given access to the above reterence
originalsource materials.
series of tetephone teresaitop now untor hair daisie
,; a memorandum of
that date by Coleman and Slawson,
posed one .
question to the CIA and made two requestsfor information
from the Agency, (Slawson - Coleman MemorandWI
April 2, 1964, Subj: Questions Raised by the Ambassador
Mann
FileX
Coleman and Slawson wrote:
1) What is the information source referred
to in the November 28 telegram that
SECRZI
Classification:
000065
Classified by derivation:.
---
## Page 58
Classification: -
SECRET
Öswad intendedect dorsenteriel astastesh
from ClA-controlled documents.)
Odessa;
sensitive
2) We would like to see copies of the
raw datal
transeripts of the intercepts, translated
if possible, in all cases where the
Law data!
Intercepts reter to the assassination.
sensitive
renditine
or related subjects;
3 We would especially like to see the
raw data
intercept in which the allegation tha
money was passed at the Cuban Embassy
is discussed
(Ibia.)
The question initially posed by (Item I) in
the above-referenced memorandum of April 2 concerns
a seniore
sparatio..
then CIA terephonio intercept of September 27, 1963-
* Sen
at 10:37 a.m= f(Slawson Memorandum of April 21
1964, p. 1)
Obviously, if Slawson found it necessary
to request the source of the information, he had
not as yet been provided access to the original
material by the CIA.
100
Item Number Two of the above listing tends to show
that the Connission had
not been giving access
the intercept
concerning the assassination.
Certain
sensitive
data
SECRET
Classification:
000056
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 59
Classification: -
_ SECRAL
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
Item number three of the above listing
sensitive
reveals hat the int rept the Dorticos-Armas
conversation of November 22, 1964, in which the
passing of monies was discussed had not as of April
2 been provided to the Commission. The Commission
information
had specifically requested) the Dorticos Armas convergatior
transcripts at a March 12, 1964 meeting between
Commission representatives and. Agency representatives.
101
(Slawson memorandum, March 12, 1964, Subj: Conference
with CIA on March 12, 1964)
On April 3, 1964, Coleman and Slawson expressed
their concern for receiving complete access to all
materials relevant to Oswald's Mexico City trip:
The most probable final result of the
entire investigation of Oswald's activities
in Mexico is a conclusion that he went
there for the purpose of trying to reach
Cuba and that no bribes, conspiracies,
etc. took place.
... In order to make such a judgment (that
all reasonable lines of investigation that
might have uncovered other motivations or
SECRET
Classification:
0000574
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 60
CIA MAG NO OSJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION ANDIOR
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT
Classification:
SECRET,
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
possible conspiracies have been followed
through with negative results), we must
become familiar with the details of what
both the American and Mexican investi-
gatory agencies there have done. This
means reading their reports, after trans-
lation, if necessary, and in some cases
talking with the investigators themselves.
10.2
(Slawson and Coleman Memorändum, April
oK
f3, 1964, Subj: Additional lines
Investigation in Mexico Which May Prove
Worthwhile, p. 11.)
However, as the rand tends to show
Manifestly, Coleman's and Slawson's desire
rampedic
for a thorough investigation had boon
Imposed"the CIA's concern test
Torexposureas subjeit to the
a limitations
sources and methods,
however relevant to the Commission's investigation,
be emposed. Considering the gravity and signi-
ficance of the warren Commission's investigation; the
the
initial
original sourer
Agency'switholding of material from the
Commission staff may have petapers ability to reach
a curately reasoned conclusions meth serpent to Oswald's
activities while in Mexico City.
Classification: -
000058
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 61
4 57
Classification: -
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-contrelled documents.)
On April 8, David Slawson, Howard Willens,
and William Coleman flew to Mexico City, Mexico
to meet with the representatives of the State
3
Department, FBI, CIA, and the Government of Mexico.
(Slawson Menorandum, April 22, 1964, Subj: Trip
Mexico City, P. l) Prior to their departure.
they met with Thomas Mann, the U.S. Ambassador to
Mexico
during Oswald's visit to Mexico City and at™
104
the time of President Kennedy's assassination.
Ambassador Mann told the Warren Commission representa-
about senile
operation
tives
that the CIA's- Mexico City Station-was-actively
engaged photosurveillance-operations against the
• Soviet and Cuban Embassy/Consulates (Ibid., p.
Upon the group's arrival in Mexico City, they
ND
were met by U.S. Ambassador Freeman, Claire Boonstra
of the State Department, Clarke Anderson of the FBI,
Lein africanses
i 1060
and Winston scott Ethe CIA
(Ibid. pp. 9-10)"
That same day, during a meeting between the
Commission kepresentatives and Win Seott-Scott made
the raw dete
informithile
available to the group actual transcripts of the -CIA's
peacheded
con unis tadophonic surpidance operations accompanied pith or
side decutione. 107
English translations-ofthe transe
In addition,
senitive
Classification:
000059
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 62
38
CIA HAS NO CEJECTION TO
/DECLASSIFICATION ANDIOR
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT
Classification: -
he provided the group
CIA controller 480
Lie material strategraphs photogra
for the time period covered by Oswald's visit.
that had resulted fróm photosur
i hane
108
Cuban and soviet Embassy entratces. Davia slawson
wrote:
D
Mcfeett stated at the beginning
of his narrative that he intended to make
a complete disclosure of all facts,
including the sources of his information,
and that he understood that all three of
us had been cleared for TOP SECRET and
that we would not disclose beyond the
confines of the Commission and its
immediate staff the information we obtain-
ed through him without first clearing it
with his superiors in washington.y
agreed to this."
(Ibia.]
The CIA diana entire
stat
Ma Scott described to the Commission
repre- Meteo
directly
sentatives the CIA's course of action i:
following the assassination, indicating that his
staff immediately began to compile dossiers on
Oswald, Duran, and everyone else throughout Mexico
whom
the CIA knew had had some contact with Oswald
(Ibid.)
Seett revealed that all known Cuban and Russian
intelligence agents had quickly. been put under
surveillance following the assassination. Slawson
concluded :
[CIA Representative'.
"Scotts narrative plus the material we
were shown disclosed immediately how
incorrect our previous information had
and men can ease state the soutet
and Mexican
Classification:
Thereferene should bete
Subar
classified by dil0,0 50
---
## Page 63
"CIA
spresen
eite
39
Classification:
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
distortionsorndledicaduns to which our
information had been subjected had
entered some place in Washington,
because the CIA information that we
[CIA
on
We had
previously planned to show Soott, Slawson's
reconstruction of Oswald's probable
activities at the embassies to get Scott's
opinion, but once we saw how badly distorted
our information was we realized that this
would be useless.
Therefore, instead,
decided to take as close notes as possible
Irom the original source materials at some
later time during our visit." (Ebias salads
A separate Slawson nemorandum of April 2I, 1964 records
the results of the notetaking from original source
materials that he did following scott's disclosures.
Esensitive now datal
These notes dealt exclusively with the telephonic
intercepts pertaining to the Duran and Oswald conver-
sations tor the period sept. 27- 0ct. 1, 1963.
CS
4/21/64.
from the Soviet and Cuban Embassies in Mexico City.
It is evident from Slawson's record that the
retirene to proude the lette, Commission in. ta
Agency's den.
len at ot original source materials, in this
case the telephonic surveillance intercepts,
affecte
impeived
the Commission's ability to draw accurately
reasoned conclusions regarding oswald's sofourn in
Merco city.
It meant that as of April Á0, 1964,
Classification:
SECRET
Soto
yellon
legal odditions
000061
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 64
CIA HAS NO OSJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT
de
Q
othe
40
Classification: -
sicker
This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
nearing the halfway point of the warren conmission
0011 1585340-
investigation, the Commission
forced to retrac
the factual path by which it had structured Oswald's
activities in Mexico City.
It further revealed that
the Agency had provided ambiguous information to
the Comnission when, in fact "on almost all the
crucial points" significantly more precise materials
could haye been made available for analysis by the
Commission. (Ibid.)
Thus, the Agency's early policy
ginal source
of not/ providing the Commission with
Nically retevant
intortet on derived from assain sepsitive sources
hamper en
and methods had gerouslyades
ned the investigation
and/ possibly foreclosed lines of
investigation e.g,
Cuban involvement, that might have been more seriously
considered had this material been expeditiously
provided.
Monitot Station ho poserstitine and the
Merteo C
On November 23, 1963, FBI Special Agent Odüm
showed Marguerite Oswald a photograph of a man
bearing no physical resemblance to her son
(Warren
Classification:
Classified by derivatial. 0 0 0 5 2
---
## Page 65
noneed
to chara
declds. pur-
pases
Some
Agency
Roce
Classification:
SECRET
-114
commission here is tobag usefues mate tograg had beer
roman controited documents.
supplied to the FBI on November 22 by the CIA S
117
Mexico Gity StatIon-after Ageney representatives
had searched their files in an effort to locate
Ook
Ibid.
•117
information on Oswald. (CIA DOC. DDP4-1555, 3/25/64
@ok
warren Conmission Doc. GAT this photograph, which was one
in a series suing fron the CIA S photosurveillande
K operations against the soviet and cuban Embassy comoriato
Prior to the assassination,
had been linked by
the Mexico City Station to Lee Harvey Oswald.
(Ibid
Richard Helms, in a
sworn affidavit before the Warren
Commission, stated that the photograph shown to
outside of the coid.io
Marguerite oswald
dal United
red been take do the per 5963
July'i
in Mexico City and mistakenly Linked-at-that-time-to
1963 to November 23, 1963-
Oswald.
/(Warren Commission Affidavit of Richard Helms
5119
ofwarterCominissianfter.ngs
8/7/64, Vol. XI, pp. 469-470)
On February 101964, Marguerite Oswald testified
before the Warren Commission and recounted the cir-
cumstances under which she was shown the photograph.
—лужарие :волоснеіна ТАМЕНАЛУіСІММ
(Warren Commission Report Vol 1p153 Mrs. Oswald testified
that she
believed this photograph to have been of Jack
Ruby. (Ibia. )):
0/21
12.
Classification:
S40/31
000053
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 66
Luck
Reprisin
Classification: -
42 -
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
Thereafter, on February 12, 1964, J. Lee
Rankin wrote to Thomas Karramesines, Assistant DDP
requesting both the identity of the individual
depicted in the photograph and an explanation of
the circumstances by which this photograph was
obtained by the Central Intelligence Agency.
6127
(Letter of J. Lee Rankin, Feb. 12, 1964, JFK DOC.
#3872) FOIA 543-233A
On that same day, in a separate letter,
Rankin wrote to DCI McCone regarding materials
that the CIA had disseminated since November 22,
1963 to the Secret Service but not to the Warren
Commission. Rankin requested copies of these
materials which included three CIA cables.
The
that 102 3660
cables concerned the photograph subsequently shown in. fr
by the FBI to Oswald's mother of the individual
originally identatied by the ent to ation
123,.
as' Lee Harvey Oswald f'(Letter of J. Lee Rankin"
Feb.
12, 1964, JFK DOC.
#3872)
541-235A
Amrong the materiat's dIsseminated by the CIA
to Chelsecret set Vas & November 26 dissemination.
dK (CIA BoEnaT3177, 11/26/64) That cable concerned
FOiA
76-7276164)
Classification:.
000064
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 67
43
Classification: -
during
(This form is to be used for material extracted
the DorticASmAmaScoRPalla a8aufreRß.$
and
disclosed the
CiA denitive popsetti that
existence of GIA telephone surveintance operations
information
in Mexico-city at the time of the assassination
andposwald's earlier visite's
a result the CIA was
reluctant to make the material disseminated to
the Secret Service available to the Warren Commission
for in so doing the Agency would have necessarily exposed its
sensitive splation
telephonic surseillance operationsto the Commission.
John Scelso testified
regarding the circumstances
surrounding the eventual explanation given to the
Commission
recounting the origion of the photograph in
question.
Scelso stated:
"We did not initially disclose to the
Warren Commission all of our technical/fensin
In other words, we did not
initially disclose to them that we had
Gauch
operator s
photosurveillance because the November
photo we hady (of MMM) was not of Oswald.
Therefore it did not mean anything,
see?"{HS.CA: C/ass Depo of John"
SeEtso, 51161787158
Mr. Goldsmith:
...So the Agency was making a unilateral
decision that this was not relevant to the Warren
commission bid/s
Scelso:
Right, we were not authorized, at first,
to caveat a11 our tes nice opera 1028/18;
sensitive)
Rin: 1507 Ebid
In summary the records shows that
By February 12, 1964 the Warren Commission had
(inadvertantly) requested access to telephonic surveillance
proa
ten, a cause for concern within the Agenty
quietu
Classification: -
SECRET
000065
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 68
S
ossitication
(This form is to be used for material extracted
this deam tortolted urseurtentsmaterial extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
1044-
due to the sensitivity of Agency sources and methods.
Similarly, the possible disclosure/of the photo veilance
operations to the Warren Commissionkhad also begun to cause
concern within the Agency.
oll.
On March 5, 1967, Raymond Rocca wrote in an
internal memorandum to Richard Helms that "we have
a problem here for your determination." Rocca
outlined Angleton's desire not to respond directly
to Rankin's request of February 12 regarding the ClA
material forwarded to tre secret servi
since
November 23, 1964.P0
-occa then stated:
"Unless you feel otherwise, Jim would
prefer to wait out the Commission on the
matter covered by paragraph 2 (of the
above-referenced February 12 letter to McCone
requesting access to CIA reports provided
367 the Secret Service after November 22, 1963,
ok
AJFK DOC: 3902) .
If they come back on this
point he feels that you, or someone from
here, should be prepared to go over to show
that to them in copy:
Commission the material rather than pass
Incidentally, none
of these items are of new substantive
interest.
We have either passed the material
in substance to the Comnission in response to
earlier levies or the items refer to aborted
leads, for example, the famous, six photographs
which are not of aswaldal ICTA DoC.
*. FOIA
#579-250, 3/5/64; see also HSCA Classified
Deposition of tames Angleton, 10/5/78e PP. 31t:3
17
nation.-
000006
2000523
Hay deniention:
C. Berk
---
## Page 69
Classification:
Se
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
fridris Gibm contoolled deduntentsaterial extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
-44a-
potato
127
wherein he states that the only reason
for not providing the Warren Commission with
access to CIA surverttance materials (tie e mush
ent
was due to the Agency's concern for
protection of its sources and methods)
000067
Erassification:
20.
0521
Elassilied by derivations
---
## Page 70
Classification:
SECTATI
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
On March 12, 1964, representatives of the
Warren Commission and the CIA confered regarding
the February 12 request for the materials forwarded
ok to the Secret Service by the Ageney.
(Letter of
FOIA 6041-256017
J. Lee Rankin March 16, 1964, JFK DOC. # 3872, Slawson*
Memorandum, March 12, 1964)
The record indicates that the Commission at
the March I2 meeting pressed for access to the
§lesionis
com. March 121194
Secret Service materials. Rankin wrote to Helms
on March 16. that it was his understanding that the
CIA would supply the Commission with a paraphrase of
each report or communication pertaining to the Secret
Service materials "with all indications of your
confidential communications techniques and confidential
sources deleted. VYou will also afford members of.
our staff working in this area an opportunity to
review the actual file so that they may give assurance
hat the paraphrases are.complete..
(Letter of J. Tee
FOIA 604-2564
Rankin, March 16, 1964, paragraph 2, JFK DOC. No. 3872) -
Rankin further indicated that the same
procedure was to be followed regarding any material
in the possession of the CIA prior to November 22,
130
131
132
Classification: -
008068
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 71
Classification: -
SECRET.
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
1963 which had not as yet been furnished because
133
it concerned sensitive sources and methods.
(Ibid.,
par.
3)
Helms responded to Rankin's March 16 letter
oli on March 24 (POIA 7 622-258) by two separate
-134.
F01H693-258
communications! (CIA Doc. DDP4-1554, hereinafter CD 631,
Furt 6ä1-259
ola
3/24/64, CIA Doc., DDP4-1555, 3/24/64, CD 674 hereinafter)
) CD 631 provided the Commission with a copy of the
textile. "October 10, 1963 CIA dissemination to FBI, State Dept.+
C00Bi
INS and Navy Dept. (and to the Secret Service on
22 Nov.) regarding Lee Harvey Oswald and his presence
at the Soviet Consulate in Mexico City.
The response
3
I further revealed that on October 23, 1964, CIA had
fyam the Navy.
requested two copies of the most recent photograph
of oswald in order to check the identity e
of the person
I-DI
believed to be Oswald in Mexico City
Furthermore,
cank
the CIA stated, though it did not indicate when, that
it had determined that-the photograph shown to Marguerite
oswald on rovember 2, 1903 sa pae seter to ree
26
Harvey OswaldT The Ágency explained that it had checked the
photograp
against the press photographs of Oswald generally
available on November 23, 1963,
CD 674 reveals that on Nov. 22, 1963 immediately follow
Exilain
is 0571 Classification:
000069
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 72
0.:.
47
Classification: -
(This form is to be used for material
extracted
the assasstom Etonconfiled documenmper 23,
1963, three
cabled reports were received at CIA headquarters
from the CIA Maxico City Station regarding photographs
of an unidentified man who had visited the Cuban and
ED674
Soviet Embassies during October and November 1963.
Paraphrases of tiese cables, not revealing sensitive
sources and methods, were
attached to CD(674.
The
Agency wrote that the subject of the photo referenced
in these cables was not Oswald. It was further
stated that:
"In response to our meeting of z. March and
your memo of 16 March,Stern and, Willens
To t review
or these 3
Service and the cables
fied man."
March 1964)4
(CIA DOC. DDP4-1555 €D63424
14°
On March
26, William Coleman wrote in a memorandum
for the record:
2
"The CIA directed a memorandum to J. Lee Rankin
on-March 24: 1964 (Commission Document No. 631)
in which it set forth the dissemination of
the information on Lee Harvey Oswald.
I realize
that this memorandum is only a partial answer
to our inquiry to the CIA dated March 16, 1964
and I hope that the complete answers will give
us the additional information we requested."
(Memorandum of William Coleman, March
24, 196AT%
Coleman went on to state:
"As you know, we are still trying to get an
explanation of the photograph which the FBI
showed marsuerite one
en after the
21°
Classification:
13
$9
FWH
141
Classified by derila 8:0 0 70
---
## Page 73
No
all.
- 48: 55221
Classification:
This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA controlled documents.)
assassination.
hope that paragraph
of the memorandum of March 24, 1964
[CD 631) sent Mr. Rankin by the CIA
is not the answer which the CIA intends
114
to give us as to this inquiry " (Ibid.
Marit. 27
The following day, as agreed by Warren Commission
and Agency representatives, Samuel Stern of the
Commission visited CIA headquarters in Langley,
Sterns' memorandum of his visit reveals -that
he reviewed Oswald's file with Raymond Recca.
Stern
indicated that Oswald's file contained those materials
oll
furnished previously to the Warren Commission by, +5
Al "the file also contained:
fron
"Cable reports^of November 22 and-November
1903
23, from the CIA's Mexico City Station
parton
relating to the photograph of the unidenti-
the Cohan.
i? Octoberdo 6,60
fied individual mistakenty believed to-be
19÷1
Lee Harvey oswald'and the reports on these
cables furnished on Novembar 25, 1992 0 02/92
"sharehone
(Memorandum
the segret service by the et the sa...
of Santel stern, March 27, 1964)
Stern noted that these messages were accurately
paraphrased in the attachments to CD 674 provided the
# Paragraph 4 of CD 631 stated that CIA soncludiettie
Classified by derivar8.0 0 0 71
---
## Page 74
- 49-
Classitication: -
_SEC
1417
(This form is to be used for materiat extracted
warren Comfressian entreles cecuments 19647k
He/also
reviewed the october 18, 1963 cable from erA a field sti
Mexico
station to
CIA headquarters
reporting Oswald's contact with the Soviet Embassy
Ilia
in Mexico City.-
In
/addition, Stern examined the
October 10, 1963 cable from CIA headquarters to
the Mexico City Station reporting background infor-
mation on Oswald." (Ibid.))
stern recorded / 4 9.
that . these messages
were
Reprie
Jok. paraphrased accurately as-set forth in the CIA's January
31 memo to the Warren Commission reporting Oswald's
Mexico City trip Fbid
1150
Lastly, Stern noted that Rocca provided him
for his review a computer printout of the references
/51
to Oswald-related documents
Located in the Agencys
electronic data storage system.
stated "there is
i no itera listed on the printout which jehe Warren con.
mission has not been given either in full text of.
paraphrased." ( (Ibia.)
0157
Thus, by the 27th of March, a Warren Commission
representative had been apprised of the circumstances
surrounding the mysterious photograph.
Classification:
000072
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 75
- 53 -
Classification: -
SECRET
This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
Luisa Calderon
Approximately five hours after President
Kennedy's assassination a Cuban government employee
in Mexico City, named "luisa" received a telephone
call from an unidentified-man-speaking spanisia.
-153
IN 697.
( CIA DOC. FOrA SEXT 7105, 11/27/63, 173-615, attachment)
This call had been intercepted and zecorded by the
CIA'sMexico City Station as the result of its
15%
(Ibid.
The Mexica
City Station as subsequently reported to CIA
headquarters, identified the Luisa of the conversa-
tion as Luisa Calderon, who was then employed in
the Commercial Attache's office at the Cuban Consu-
late
(Ibid=)
SISS
During the course of the conversation, the
unidentified caller asked Luisa if she had heard
(of the assassination)
the latest news. Luisa replied in a joking tone:
"Yes, of course, I knew almost before Kennedy."
(Ibid.)
0/56
CIA'S
Paraphrasing the telephone intercept transcript,
it states that the caller told Luisa
the person
#Paraphrade on translator's interpretatio
an Calderon's 5905%
Classification: SECRET
Classified by d000.073
---
## Page 76
CIA HAS NO OG/E
TONTO
DECLASSPIOATICN ANDIOR
RELEASE OF THS DOCUMENG
158
54
Classification: -
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
apprehended for Kennedy's slaying was the
-15>
"President of one of the Committees of the Fair
alid
Play
for Cuba."
Luisa replied that she also knew
159
Th:
this
Idisa inquired whether the person being
held for the killing was a
"gringo.
The unidenti-160
fied caller replied, "yes!
""'.
Idisa told her caller
that she had learned nothing else about the assassina-
161
tion and that she had learned about the assassination
I lore
only a little while ago.
The unidentified caller
commented:
We think that if it had been or had
seemed... public or had been one of
the segregationists or against
intergration who had killed Kennedy,
then
there was, let's say, the
possibility that a sort of civil
war would arise in the United States:
who knows
that contradictions would be sharpened...
8162
Luisa responded:
Imagine, one, two, three and now, that
makes three. (She laughs.) (Ibid, D.27
Raymond Rocca, in response
to a 1975 Rocke-
feller Commission request for information on a
possible Cuban conspiracy to assassinate President
Kennedy wrote regarding Calderon's comments:
Classification: -
Classified by derivaliD Dü7$
---
## Page 77
Slassifisati8A:
Secret
(an i are ate, materia grated
-55-
Latin hyperbole? Boastful ex post facto
suggestion of foreknowledge.
This is the
only item in the intercept coverage of
the Cubans and Soviets after the assassina-
tion that contains the suggestion of fore-
knowlege of expectation. (CIA DOC.
Memorandum of Raymond Rocca for DC/OPS,
5/23/75, p. 152* fsee p, 55a for t
Standing by itself, Luisa Calderon's cryptic
comments do not merit serious attention. Her words
164
may indeed indicate foreknowledge of the assassina-
tion but may egually be interpreted without such a
sinister implication. Nevertheless, the Committee
has determined that Luisa Calderon's case should
have merited serious attention in the months following
the assassination.
In connection with the assassination, Luisa
" Calderon's nana first surfaced ca Movember 27, 195%
in a cable sent by then Ambassador Mann to the State
Fo.:
5'65
- /' Department (CIA DOC. DIR-85573, 11/27/63).
In that cable Mann stated:
.. Washington should urgently consider
feasibility of requesting Mexican authorities
to arrest for interrogation: Eusebio Azcue,
Luisa Calderon and Alfredo Mirabal.
The two
men are Cuban national and Cuban consular
officers. Luisa Calderon is a secretary
in Cuban Consulate here."
Ebid.)
11606
Classfication: -
2060525
Elasified by derivation.
003075
C. Berk
---
## Page 78
ClassificatigA:
(This form is t8
Secret
ysed for material extracted
-55a-
*Regarding the issue of whether Calderon's comments
could reasonably be interpreted to indicate possible
foreknowledge, the CIA position is as follows:
During the Rockefeller Commission inquiry,
Calderon's conversation was identified
as a possible item of information from
the Agency's Cuban and Soviet telephone
intercepts that might suggest foreknowledge
of a plot to assassinate the American Presi
dent. This involves a faulty translation of an
answer Calderon gave to her caller.
In answer
to the latter's question as to whether she
had heard the latest news, Calderon said:
"Si, claro, me entere casiantes que Kennedy."
The verb entere is mistranslated. Me entere
(the first person of the verb enterarsede,
past tense) should be translated as
found
out (or I learned) /about it -- the assassination/
almost before Kennedy Ldid/." In other words,
Calderon was saying she heard about the shooting
of Kennedy almost at the time the event took
place...
(CIA DoC., Memorandum
Regarding
Luisa Calderon conversation, p.1).
= 12
double
spacer
The Committee fundamentally disputes the
narrow interpretation of Calderon's comments
assigned by the Agency. It is the Committee's
position that translation of Me Entere as
either "I found out" or "I learned about"
does not foreclose interpretation of Calderon's
comments as a suggestion on her part of possible
foreknowledge of President Kennedy's assassination.
The interpretation, i nany event.
shouldhavesn/eftto
Hejudgement of theidarren iommission, not tre clA
Classification:
000076
20.0526
Classified by derivation: -
---
## Page 79
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATICR ANDIOR
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT
Classification: -
See
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
fr983 fAm fontrolled securpeptinaterial extracted
from ClA-controlled s/gsuments.)
This cable does not state the basis for
arresting Calderon.* However, the CIA's copy of this
cable bears a handwritten notation on its routing
page. That
notation states: "Info from Amb Mann
for. Sec Rusk re: ...persons involved with Oswald
in Cuban Embassy." Mann went on to state in urgent
I terms: "They may, quickly be returned to Havana in
order to eliminate any possibility that Mexican
o government could use them as witnesses.
According to CIA files, Calderon made
reservations to return to Havana on Cubana Airlines on
December 11, 1963, less than four weeks after the b
assassination.
(CIA Doc. CSCI-316/01783-65, 4/26/63)
• Calderon, Azcue and Mirabal were not arrested
nor detained for questioning by the Mexican federal
7870
police.
However, Silvia Duran, a friend and associate
of Calderon's and the one person believed to have
the Committee's belief
that Mann was prompted
to request the arrest of Calderon on the basis of
Gilberto Alvarado Ugarte's allegation that Calderon
was present at the Cuban Embassy when Oswald
was allegedly given a sum of money presumably to
carry out
the assassination of President Kennedy•
fIA.
¿ June 1964, Attaehment C)
/ 8
Cassification: -
tret
167
2000527
000077
C.
Berk
Sassed Dy
assified
derivation:
derivation:
---
## Page 80
ElassificatisA:
sgoget
extracted
-57-
had repeated contact with Oswald while he was in
Mexico City, was arrested and questioned by the
Mexican police on two separate occasions. (CIA
DoC. DIR 84950, 11/23/63, CIA DOC. DIR 85471222
13.
11/27/63)
During
her second interrogation, Duran was
questioned regarding her association with Calderon.
There is no indication in the reinterrogation report
accounting for the questioning of Duran about Calderon.
(CIA DOC. DDP40940, 2/21/64)
The information regarding
Duran's interrogation was passed to the Warren Commission
on February 21, 1964, more than two months after
Calderon had returned to Cuba.
17/
(Ibid.)
Information was reported to the CIA during
May 1964, from a Cuban defector, tying Luisa
Calderon to the Cuban Intelligence apparatus. The
defector, ANMUG-1, was himself a Cuban Intelligence
Officer who supplied valuable and highly reliable
information to the CIA regarding Cuban Intelligence
operations. (CIA Doc., Memorandum of Joseph Langösch
to Chief, Office of Security, 6/23/64) Calderon's
169
170
177
Elassification: secre
2060523
009078
derivation:
C. Berk
---
## Page 81
ElassificatigA: -
secret
This form in is me me me men t
-57a-
173
ties to Cuban intelligence were reported to the warden
Commission on June 18, 1964
(CIA DoC. FOIA #739-319)
6/19/64) However, the Committee has determined from
its review that the CIA did not provide Calderon's
conversation of November 22 to the Warren Commission.
Consequently, even though the Warren Commission was aware that
SERPET
Elassified By derivation:
000073
Classification:
2000523
---
## Page 82
- 58
Classification: -
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
Calderon
had connections to intelligence work,
as did other Cuban Embassy officers, the vital
link between her background and her comments
was never established for the Warren Commission
by the CIA. The Agency's oversight in this
regard may have forclosed the Commission from
actively pursuing a lead of great significance.
Calderon's 201 file reveals) that she
arrived in Mexico City from Havana on January 16,
1963, carrying Cuban Passport E/63/7. Her date
of birth was believed to be 1940 (CIA Doc. Dispatch
HMMA21612, no date given) Calderon's presence in
Mexico City was first reported by the CIA on July
15, 1963 in a dispatch.
. from the CIA's Miami field
office to the CIA's Mexico City station and to the
Chief of the CIA's Special Affairs Staff (for Cuban
operations). (CIA Doc. Dispatch JECA-10095, 7/15/63)
That dispatch had attached to it a report containing
biographic data on personnel then assigned to the
Cuban Embassy in Mexico City. At page three of the
attached report Luisa Calderon was listed as Secretary
of the Cuban Embassy's commercial office. The
000080
Classification: -
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 83
59
Classification: -
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA - controlled documents.)
notation indicated that a report was pending on
No such report is present
Calderon. (Ibid., p. 3 of attachment) The
in Calderon's
201 File.
Agency has attempted, without success, to locate
the report.
Luisa Calderon's association with the Cuban
DGI was first recorded by the CIA on May 5, 1964.
(CIA DOC. 481 ina Memorandum of Harold Suenson
FOIA
68÷290 5/5/64)
At that time, Joseph Langosch,
Chief of Counterintelligence for the Special Affairs
174
Staff, reported the results of his debriefing of
the Cuban defector, AMMUG-1. The memorandum stated
thạt AMMUG-1 had no direct knowledge of Lee Harvey
Oswald or his activities but was able to provide
175
items of interest based upon the comments of certain
Cuban Intelligence Service officers
(Ibia.) specificaliy,
IMMUG-1 was asked if Oswald was known to the Cuban
intelligence services before November 23, 1953.
AilNuG-1 told Langosch
• "Prior to October 1963, Oswald
visited the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City-on two or
three occasions. Before, during and after these
visits, Oswald was in contact with the Direccion
Classification: -
$3
000081
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 84
on rind NO ORJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION ANDOR
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUIEME
60 -
Classification: _
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
General De Intelligencia (DGI), specifically
with Luisa Calderon, Manuel Vega Perez, and
Rogelio Rodriguez Lopez."
(Ibia?)
176
Langosch thereafter wrote that Calderon's
precise relationship to the DGI was not clear.
As a comment to this statement he set forth the
CIA cable and dispatch traffic which recorded her
arrival in Mexico during January 1963 and departure
for cuba within one month after the assassination.
(Ibid.)
On May 7, 1964, Langosch recorded additional
information he had elicited from AMMUG-1 regarding
Oswald's possible contact with the DGI.
(CIA DOC
FOIA 687-295, attach. 6, 5/1/64) § Paragraph 3 of
this memorandum stated in part:
"a. Luisa Calderon, since she returned
to Cuba, has been paid a regular
salary by the DGI even though she
has not performed any services.
Her home is in the Vedado section
b.
Calderon
for several years.
Before going
to Mexico, she worked in the
Ministry of Exterior Conmerce
in the department which was known
as the "Empresa Transimport."
Her title was Secretary
• General
of the Communist Youth in the
department named in the
evIous
sentence.
(Ibid?
179
Classification:
178
000082
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 85
61
Classification: -
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
On May 8 Langosch further disclosed AMMUG'S
knowledge of the Oswald casé.
(Ibid, attach. 5)
Langosch paraphrased AMMUG's knowledge of Calderon
as follows:
I thought that Luisa Calderon might have
had contact with Oswald because I learned
about 17 March 1964, shortly before I made
a trip to Mexico, that she had been
involved with an American in Mexico.
The
information to which I refer was told to
me by a DGI case officer... I had commented
to (him) that it seemed strange that luisa
Calderon was receiving a salary from the
DGI although she apparently did not do
any work for the Service.
(The case officer)
told me that hers was a peculiar case and
that he himself believed that she had been
recruited in Mexico by the Central Intelligence
Agency although Manuel Pineiro, the Head
of the DGI, did not agree.
As I recall,
(the case officer) had investigated Luisa
Calderon.
This was because, during the time
she was in Mexico, the DGI had intercepted
a letter to her by an American who signed
his name OWER (phonetic) or something
similar. As you know,
the pronunciation
of Anglo-Saxon names is difficult in
Spanish so I am not sure of how the name
mentioned by Hernandez should be spelled.
It could have been "Howard" or something
different.
As I understand the matter,
the letter from the American was a love
letter but indicated that there was a
clandestine professional relationship
between the writer and Luisa Calderon.
I also understand from (the case officer)
that after the interception of the letter
she had been followed and seen in the
company of an American.
if / 81
Classification:
000083
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 86
62
Classitication: -
SECREI
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
On May 11, Raymond Rocca wrote a memorandum
to Director Richard Helms regarding the information
swenson
ad elicited from AMMUG ICIA DOC. FOIA 682-295.
5/11/64, Rocca Memorandum)
Rocca proposed that "the
DDP in person or via a designee, perferably the
A-i
former, discuss the AMMUG-I situation on a very
restricted basis with Mr. Rankin at his earliest
convenience either at the Agency or at the Commission
-182
headquarters. Until this takes place, it is not
desirable to put anything in writing.
(Ibid. p.
On May 15, 1964, Helms wrote Rankin regarding
A-I'S
AMMUG's information about the DGI, indicating its
sensitivity and operational significance,
(CIA DOC.
FOIA 697-294, 5/15/64, Helms Memorandum) / Attached
to Helms' connunication was a paraphrased accountings s
of Langosch's May 5 memorandum.
(Ibia.)
that
attachment the intelligence associations of Manuel
Vega Perez and Rogelio Rodriguez Lopez were set forth.
183
However, that attachment made no reference whatsoever
to Luisa Calderon.
Howard Willens of the Warren Commission
requested as a follow-up to the May 15 memorandum,
Classification:
578. 3T
000084
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 87
• 63
Classification:
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
access to the questions used in Langosch's
186
all interrogation of AMUG.
(CIA DOC. FOIA 739-316, 6/19/64,
Memorandum)
On June 18, 1964 Arthur Dooley of
Roccals Counterintelligence Research and Analysis
A.1
Group took the questions and AMMUG's
responses to
the Warren Commission's office's for Willen's review.
Willens saw Langosch's May 5 memorandum. The only
mention of Calderon was as follows: "The precise.
relationship of Luisa Calderon to the DGI is not
clear. She spent about six months in Mexico from
1817
which she returned to Cuba early in 1964."
(Ibid
However, Willens
was not shown Langosch's
memoranda of May 7 and May 8, 1964 which contained
much more detailed information on Luisa Calderon,
Al's report 96
including her possible association with Lee Harvey
188
Oswald and/or American intelligence
(Ibia.) *
The Warren Commission as of June 19, 1964,
had little if no reason to pursue the Luisa Calderon
lead. It had effectively been denied significant
It should be noted that these memoranda of May 5,
7, 8, 11 and June 19 with attachments, are not
referenced in the Calderon 201 file.
(See CIA
Computer printout of Calderon 201 file)
Their
existence was determined by the Committee's
independ lassificationi: other agency files.
SECRETI
Classified by derivation:
000085
---
## Page 88
64
Classification: -
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
background information. This denial may have
impeded or prevented
the Commission's pursuit
of Calderon's potential relationship to oswald
and the assassination of President Kennedy. But
even if the Warren Commission had
learned
of Calderon's background and possible contact with
Oswald it still had been denied the one significant
piece of information that might have raised its
interest in Calderon to a more serious level. The
Warren Commission was never told about Calderon's
conversation of November 22, 1964)
Classification:
Classified by derivatioD D 0 08 6
---
## Page 89
- 65 -
Classification: -
SECREL
This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
Seep66#
the Calderon 201 file Dear:
reference to the conversation nor does it indicate
that it was ever made known to or provided the
Warren Commission for its analysis. (CIA Compute
print-out of Calderon 201 file)
In an effort to
determine the manner in which the
treated the Calderon conversation this Committee
posed the following questions to the CIA:
1. Was the Warren Commission or any Warren
Commission staff member ever given access
to the transeript of a telephone conversa-
Lian dated November 22, 1963, between a
female employee of the Cuban Embassy/
Consulate in Mexico City, identified
as Luisa, and an unidentified male speak-
ing from outside the Cuban Embassy/Con-
sulate? If so, please indicate when
this transcript was provided to the Warren
Commission or its staff, which CIA official
provided it, and which Warren Commission
members or staff reviewed it.
2..
Was the Warren Commission or any member
of the Warren Commission or any Warren
Commission staff member ever informed
Classification:
SE
ET
000087
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 90
ClassifisatisR: =
from
rom a conrolled
- 65a -
Secret
documents.
documents.
orally or in writing of the substance of the
above-referenced conversation of November 22,
1963?
If so, please indicate when and
in what form this information was provided,
and which CIA official provided it. (HSCA
request letter of August 28, 1978)
The CIA responded by memorandum:
"Although the (Mexico-fity Station considered
the conversation of sufficient possible
interest to send a copy to headquarters,
the latter apparently did nothing with
it, for there appears to be no record in the
Oswald file of such action as may have
been
taken.
A review of those Warren
Commission
documents containing information
provided by the Agency and still bearing
Secret or Top Secret classification does
not reveal whether the conversation was
given or shown to the commission.
(CIA DOC. , Memorandum
Regarding Luisa
Calderon conversation, p. 1)
The available evidence thus supports the
conclusion that the Warren Commission was never
given the information nor the opportunity by
which it could evaluate Luisa Calderon's
significance to the events surrounding President
Kennedy's assassination. Had the Commission been
expeditiously provided this evidence of her
intelligence background, association with Silvia
Duran, and her comments following the assassination,
it may well have given more.
serious investigative
Classification: -
-189
190
000088
Crustified by daciratin&n-
---
## Page 91
66
Classification: -
consideration to her potential knowledge of Oswald
(This form is to be used for material extracted
and the Cub#em derantated dollenile involvement in
a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy.
Two difficult issues remain which are raised
by the Committee's finding. First, why didn't
the Agency provide the Calderon conversation to the
Warren Connission; secondly, why didn't the Agency
reveal to the Warren Commission its full knowledge
of Calderon's intelligence background, her possible
knowledge of Oswald and her possible connection to
the CIA or some other American intelligence apparatus.
The first question can be explained in benign
terms. It is reasonably possible that by sheer
oversight the conversation was filed
away and not
recovered or recollected until after the Warren
Commission had completed its investigation and
#eep 65, circled portion as tootnoremertini
published its repori.
(See above CIA explanation)
As for the Agency's withholding of information
concerning Calderon's intelligence background, the
record reflects that the Commission was merely
informed that Calderon may have been a member of
-I P
the DGI.
CIA DOC. 5/5/64,
Swenson Memorandu
The memoranda which provided more extensive examina-
tion of her intelligence background were not made
Classification: .
000089
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 92
67 -
Classification: SECRET,
EJECTION TO
CIAYA
FICATION ANDOR
DECiA
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
available for the Commission's review. Significantly,
the May 8 memorandum written by Joseph Langosch
following his debriefing of mltvo'1 indicated that
AMMUG-1 and a second Cuban Intelligence officer
85192
believed Calderon to be a CIA operative. (CIA DOC
FOIA 687-295, attach 5, 5/8/64) It is possible
that this information was not provided the Warren
Commission either because there was no basis in
fact for the allegation or because the allegation
was of substantive concern to the Agency. If the
allegation were true, the consequences for the CIA
would have
been serious. It would have demonstrated
possible
that a CIA operative, well placed in the Cuban Embassy,
may have possessed information prior to the assassina-
tion regarding Oswald and/or his relationship to the
Cuban Intelligence Service. and that Services
possible involvement in a conspiracy to assassinate
President Kennedy•
Regarding Calderon's possible association
with the CIA, Agency files reviewed reveal no
ostensible connection between Calderon and the CIA.
Classification:.
000090
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 93
Dok
68 -
SECRET
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
However, there are indications that such contact
between Calderon and the Agency was contemplated.
A September 1, 1963 CIA dispatch from the Chief
of the Special Affairs Staff to the CIA's Chief
of Station in Mexico City states in part:
... Luisa Calderon has a sister residing
in Reynosa, Texas, married to an American
of Mexican descent.
If (CIA asset) can
further identify the sister, our domestic
exploitation section might be in a posi-
tion to follow up on this lead...Please
levy the requirement on (CIA asset) at
the next opportunity.
(CIA Doc.
11935, 9/1/63)
An earlier CIA dispatch from the CIA Chief
of Station in Mexico City to the Chief of
the CIA's
Western Hemisphere Division records that:
Wilfredo of the Cuban Consulate, Tampico,
reported that Luisa Calderon has a sister
residing in Reynosa, Texas... Luisa may go
up to the border to
visit her sister soon--
or her mother may make the trip--details
not clear TCIA DOC. #IMMA 21849, July 3I,
1965)
At the very least; the above dispatches
evidenced an interest in the activities of Calderon
and
her family. Whether this interest took
the form of a clandestine agent relationship is
not revealed by Calderon's 201 file.
SECRET
$ 3
194
Classification:.
000091
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 94
- 69 -
Classification:
SECRET
CLA HAS NO ORVE
DECLASSIFICATION ANDIOR
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
The Conmittee has queried David Ronis, the
author of the above cited dispatch requesting
that Calderon's sister be contacted by the CIA's
"domestic exploitation section."
C¡HSCA Class.
Staff Interview of David Ronis, 8/31/78) Ronis
was a member of the CIA's Special Affairs Staff
at the time he wrote the dispatch. He worked
principally at CIA headquarters and was responsible
for recruitment and handling of agents for collection
of intelligence data. Mr. Ronis, when interviewed
by this Committee, stated that part of his responsi-
bility was to scour the Western Hemisphere division
for operational leads
related to the work of the
Special Affairs staff. Ronis recalled that he
normally would send requests to CIA field stations
for information or leads on various persons. Often
he would receive no response to these requests,
which normally indicated that no follow-up had
either been attempted or successfully conducted.
It was Ronis' recollection that the above-cited
domestic exploitation section was a task force
within the Special Affairs Staff. He also stated
that in 1963 the CIA's Domestic Contacts Division
Classification: -
195
Classified by dllDi:Q.092.
---
## Page 95
- 70
Classification: — 5-
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
might have been requested to locate Luisa Calderon's
sister. Ronis told the Committee that he had no
recollection of recruiting any person associated
with the Cuban Intelligence Service. He did recall
that he had recruited women to perform tasks for
the Agency. However,
he did not recall ever recruiting
any employees of the Cuban Embassy/Consulate in
Mexico City. Finally, Mr. Ronis stated that he had
no recollection that Luisa Calderon was associated
: with the CIA. (
(Ibia.))
19 Le
Various present and former CIA representatives
were queried whether Luisa Calderon had ever been
associated with the CIA. The uniform answer was
that no one recalled such an association.
(Cites:
Exec. Sess. Test. of Richard Heims, 8,9/78, p. 136;
HSCA Class. Depo. of Raymond Rocca, 7/17/78, p. 148;,
HSCA Staff Interview of Joseph Langosch, 8/21/78,
Piecuto, Interview offaly
421
Thus, the Agency's file on Calderon and the
testimony of former CIA employees have revealed no
connection between Calderon and the CIA. Yet, as
indicated earlier, this file is incomplete:the
197
Classification:
000093
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 96
:...
199
SECR
SECRET
Classification:
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
most glaring omission being the absencé from
her 201 file.lof
Calderon's
cryptic remarks
following the assassination of President Kennedy.
Buckground.inm
This Committee's investigation of Luisa
Calderon has revealed that a defector from the Cuban
Intelligence Services provided the CIA with signi-
ficant information about Lee Harvey Oswald's contacts
with the DGI in Mexico City. This defector was
A+/
assigned the CIA cryptonym AMMUG-1 (A-1 heroinafter*
CIA files reveal that A-l defected from the
DGI on April 21, 1964 in
When he defected, A-l possessed a number of DGI
documents which were subsequently turned over to
the CIA. C(CIA DOC."
IN. 68894, 4/24/64)
Following his defection, a CIA officer, Joseph H.
Langosch, went, to
to meet A-1, debrief him,
and arrange for A-l's travel into the United States.
198
(Ibid.
On May 1, 1964, 22 reels of Langosch's
*It is now known that A-l did provide signati
ant heren)
leads to the CIA regarding Luisa Calderon PIE
Gas classie itone at the dea to the infen commission.
Therefore, the possibility exists that A-l had
provided other information to tefassifiedby.
rela
to
the
Warren Commission's work
der which
wa
ted
che
Issi
000091
---
## Page 97
- 72-
SECRET
Classification:
(This form is to be used. for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
debriefing of A-l were forwarded to the Chief off
Disputer
Station in
(CIA DOC. Dispatch
7763, 5/1/647
Effective on May I, A-I was under
contract with the CIA for operational purposes.
(CIA Doc. Contract Approving Officer Meno, 8/6/64)
By June 23, 1964, Langosch was convinced that A-1
would be of great value to the Agency. He stated:
There is no question in my mind that
A -1 AMMUG-I is a bona fide defector or
that he has furnished us with accurate
and valuable information concerning
Cuban intelligence
and agents can ratson Memons Joseph hang
Director of security 6/23/64)
As an officer of the DGI, A-1 from August of
1963 until his defection was assigned to the DGI's
.20z
Derrader da
S
< Illegal Section B (CIA DOC.
IN 68894 4/24/64)
which was responsible for training agents for
assignment in Latin America. His specific responsi-
bility pertained to handling of agent operations
in El Salvador. CIA Doc. Personal Record Question-
naire 6/4/64; CIA DOC.
In 68894 4/24/64)
A-1 identified for the CIA the Cuban Intelli
gence officers assigned to Mexico City: Langosch
described A-l's knowledge of GI operations in
Mexico as follows:
SECRET
Classification:
000095
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 98
73
-
Classification: -
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR
RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT
This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA- controlled documents.)
In
Mexico City, he knows who the
intelligence people are.
One is the
Cuban Consul Alfredo Mirabal.
He is
called the Chief of the Centre. That
is his title but he is actually the
intelligence chief, or at least he
was until the 16th of April at which
time a replacement was sent to Mexico
to take over.
This fellow's name is
Manuel Vega.
The source says that
the Commercial attache whose name is
Ricardo Tapia or Concepcion
the is
not sure which is an intelligence
officer) and another one is Rogelio.
(: I might say that some of these names...
are familiar to me. (Langosch debriefing
of A-1,
, 4/30/64, p. 5 of reel 4, 4/23/64)
Thus, A-1 was able to provide the CIA soon
after his defection with accurate information
regarding DGI operations and DGI employees in
Mexico City. # In sert from p72
The Committee has reviewed the CIA's files
concerning A-l. This examination was undertaken
€ 204
to determine: 1) whether A-l had provided any
valuable investigative leads to the CIA pertaining
to the assassination of President Kennedy; and 2)
whether, if such leads were provided, these leads
and/or other significant information were made
available to the Warren Commission.
Classification:
003096
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 99
чата
Classification:
74
--
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
The Committee's initial review of the
materials provided by the CIA to the Warren
Commission did not disclose the existence of the
AMMUG files. However, the Committee did during
the course of its review examine a file containing
material passed to the Rockefeller Commission. That
file made reference to A-l.
Included in this
file was a memorandum of May 5, 1964 written by
Joseph Langosch which concerned information A-l
205°
provided about the Oswald case. ICIA DOC. FOIA 68-290)
Liängosch Memorandum, 5/5/64) Also contained within
this file were the A-1 debriefing memoranda of
May 7, and May 8, 1964 previously cited with regard 206
to luisa Calderon.C
(CIA DOC. FOIA #687-295, attach's
and 5)
Following review of the memoranda, the
Committee requested access to all CIA files
OI
concerning referring to A-1.
From review of these materials the Committee
has determined that the Warren Commission did learn
during mid-May 1964 that Lee Harvey Oswald probabl
had come in contact with DGI officers in Mexico City.
Classification:
000097
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 100
Classificion: sitt
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from CIA -controlled documents.)
the warren Commission
Prior to learning of Oswald's probable contact
with DGI officers, James Angleton, Chief of the
CIA's Counter Intelligence Staff passed an internal
memorandum to Raymond Rocca, also of the Counter-
intelligence Staff, which stated that he had been
informed by the DDP, Richard Helms, that J. Lee
Rankin had contacted John McCone to request that.
the Director consent to an interview before the
Warren Commission on May 14, 1964, (J. Edgar
Hoover also appeared before the Commission on
that date prior to McCone's appearance)
Warren
Commission Report,* f? 17129)(CIA Doc. FOIA 689-298,
Menc
James Angleton, 5/12/64 Angleton
also wrote:
I discussed with Mr. Helms the nature of
the recent information which you are
processing which originated
with the
sensitive Western Hemisphere source.
I
Informed him that in your view this would
raise a number of new factors with the
Commission, that it should not go to the
Commission prior to the Director's appear-
ance unless we have-first had some pre-
liminary reaction or made sure that the
Director is fully aware of the implica-
tions since it could well serve as the
basis for detailed questioning.
The DDP
stated that he would review this care-
fully and made (sic) a decision as to 8
the question of timing.
(Ibid.)
62077
Classification: -
Classified by derived 0098
---
## Page 101
Classification:
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
Und rint elay thelleshfuntise source referred
to in Angleton's memo was A-1. This conclusion
is
based in part upon the date of this memo which
was quite close in time to A-l's defection. In
addition, Rocca's staff prepared
prior
to DCI McCone's appearance before the Warren
a "Brief
Commission for Fresentation to the Warren Commission
outlining various positions adopted by the CIA vis a
vis its investigative efforts and assistance to the
Commission.
CIA DOC. FOIA 695-302-A, 5/14/547)05
At Tab E of this brief it states:
Within the past week, significant infor-
mation has been developed by the CIA re-
garding the relationship with Oswald of
certain Cuban intelligence personnel in
Mexico City and the reaction in Havana
within the Cuban Intelligence Service
to the news of the assassination of
President Kennedy.
The Commission Staff
is in the course of being briefed on the a /0
Cuban asspect.? (Ibid., Tab E)
On May 15, 1964, the day of McCone's interview,.
the warren Commission received its first formal
66>1
communication regarding A-1.r
-CIA DOC FOIA 697-294,
5/15/64)
However, the Agency did not at that time
identify A-l by his real name or cryptonym nor did
the Agency indicate that the source of this information
Classification:
Classified by derivahol. 0 09.9
---
## Page 102
77
Classification: -
SERREL
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
was a defector then residing under secure conditions
in the Washington, D.C. area.
communication did
(Ibid.
The May 15
state that the Agency had
established contact "with a well-placed invidivual
who has been in close and prolonged contact with
ranking officers of the Cuban Direccion General de
Intelligencia."
(Ibid.) 0z13
212
Attached to the May 15 communication was a
copy of Langosch's above referenced memorandum of
May 5, 1964 regarding knowledge of Oswald's pro-
bable contact with the DGI in Mexico City. The
attachment made no reference to the source's status
as a defector from the DGI. ((Ibid., attachment) &
As set forth in the section of this report.
concerning Luisa Calderon, on June 18, 1964, Howard
Willens of the Warren Commission reviewed Langosch's
May 5 memo and the questions upon which the informa-
tion set forth in the memo was elicited. Neither the
questions nor the memo shown to willens made
reference to the source's status as a defector col-
laborating with the CIA.
CIA DOC FOIA 739-319,5 0
6/19/64)
- 215
Classification:
stopat.
000100
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 103
Classification:
(This form is to be used for
extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
Based upon review of the Langosch memoranda,
the Committee has determined that significant
information regarding Luisa Calderon, specifically
of Nov. 22
*details of her
her conversation and association with Cuban Intelligence
notforwarded
were withald from the Warren Commission. This
information as described above, was derived from
However,
debriefings of A-1. From the Committee's review
of the A-1 file provided by the CIA, the Committee
has not found any credible evidence indicating that
other information provided by A-1 to the CIA was
relevant to the work of the Warren Commission. However,
in its review the Committee has determined that a
as
specific document referenced in the Al file is.
not present in that file.
The missing itemis of considerable concern to
the Committee.
It is a debriefing report of A-1
P. spaster No
entitled "The Oswald Case."
(CIA DOC Dispatch UPGW-
503503123/65)
On March 23, 1965, a CIA dispatch
records the transmittal of the report, along with
..17
eleven other A-1 debriefing reports^
"(Ibia.)
Next to
the listing of the "Oswald Case" debriefing report
is the handwritten notation "SI." A CIA employee
who has worked extensively with the Agency files
210
Classification: _
REL
Classified by derivation 0 0 01 01
---
## Page 104
- 552
"This f8rm is 18 be used for material extrasted
7889 ElA=e8ntfslied ascuments:)
-80-
system told a Committee staff member that this
notation was the symbol for the CIA component
known as Special Intelligence. Other CIA
representatives believed the notation was a
reference to the Counterintelligence component
CI/SIG. IN a CIA memorandum dated September 27,
1978, the CIA has adopted the position that
debriefing Report No. 40 is a duplication of
the original Langosch memorandum of May 5, 1964
concerning AMMUG's knowledge of Lee Harvey
Oswald's possible
contact with the Df.l.*
asth memorandit.
officers regarding additional information that A-l may
have supplied about Oswald. Joseph Langosch, when
interviewed by the Committee, stated that he did not
have contact with the Warren Commission and does
not know what information derived from A-1's de-
218
briefings was supplied to the Warren Commission
(HSCA
Staff Interview of Joseph Langosch, 8/21/78; Cite also
Interviews of Hildago & Piccato!
He also stated that
he does not recall that A-I provided any other information
Classification: -
26. 0630
lassiffed By dericatio
000102
€. BerK
---
## Page 105
Elassification: -
See
This form is 18 be used to material exteenage
F8m ElA Entralled assuments.
-80a-
*The CIA memorandum states in part as follows:
When CI Staff learned of AMMUG-I's defection
and considered the possibility that he
might have some knowledge of
the Oswald
case, CI Staff submitted a list of questions
to WH (Western Hemisphere) for debriefing
AMMUG-1...WH desk records reflect that
AMMUG-I was debriefed on 4 May 64 regarding
this questionnaire.../B/ecause the debriefing
on the Oswald case
was handled as a sensitive
matter, it was dictated directly to a CI
(Counterintelligence) stenographer on
5 May 1964.
Note:
A-l was debriefed on
several subjects on 4 May 64. The procedure
was to assign each subject discussed a
debriefing number and they were written
up in contact report form by the WH case
officer.
The instructions from CI staff
were to handle the Oswald case debriefing
very closely and not to keep any copies in
WH Division/. The "Oswald Case" was
logged in the WH notebook log as debriefing
report number 40, but the report itself
was dictated by the WH Case Officer directly
to a CI staff stenographer. There would
be no reason to include the number 40 on
the report of this special debriefing for
CI staff, since it was their only debriefing
report.
We are certain it is the debriefing
report (#40) because the date is the same;
it is the only debriefing report on Oswald
listed in AMMUG-l records; and it it (sic)
the only AMMUG-1 debriefing report in
Oswald's 201 file.
Classifice
(CIA DoC., Memorandum for the Record, Regarding
MMUG=1 Debriefing Repost on tire oswal
ace, 27_September September, beg, p. 1
9/2-718
CIaSSH1€a718A: -
SECRET
000103
20. 003.
Classified by
deriyation:
derivation:
---
## Page 106
Elassification: -
segfet
This form is to be used ter material extracted
-81-
on Oswald's contact with the DGI except for that
set forth in the Memoranda of May 5, 7, and 8
as discussed herein.
(Ibid.)
219
In a further effort to clarify the substance
of information that A-l provided to the CIA
regarding Oswald, the Committee has attempted
to locate A-1.
The CIA has also attempted to
locate A-1, whose present/relationship with
the Agency is ambiguous, but has been unable?
¿ste pil a for it)
to determine his present whereabouts/*
The CIA's
inability to focáte a-1 has been a source of
concern to this Committee, particularly in
light of his long association with the Agency.
remains, incomplete
Thus, ta, nitriorot cirinformation A-1
Thus,
may have supplied the CÍA about Oswald. However, with
the exception of the Calderon episode and on the
basis of the CIA's written reocrd, it appears that
the CIA provided the Warren Commission with all A-1
information of investigative significance.
A separate question remains, however. The
Agency, as noted earlier, did not reveal to the
Warren Commission that A-1 was present in the
Classificatish: —
2060002
00010
Slasified by derivation:
derivation:
---
## Page 107
Elassification: -
"This form is 18 be used dar material extranted
-81a-
*An April 1978 CIA communication to the FBI regarding
A-1 states in pertinent part:
Since 1971 (A-1) has not been involved
in any CIA operation in Miami or elsewhere.
Joseph Norris is the alias of a CIA
representative who periodically debriefs
(A-l) on personalities and methods of the
DOR A A 1216 20 228302 037 80 47 9/0/73
Vol. 4, A-1
However, a CIA handwritten index card concerning
the Agency status of A-l states:
Informed "Calvia" on 15 April 1977 that
(A-])
is still an active contact, not
receiving any salary, but could be paid if
and when used in an operation. No problems
here.
active folder. (CIA
SPOB will kegas contract in an
Handwritten Note,
15 Abril 1977, contained in Vol. 4 of A-1 file.
Classification: -
2000033
Elasilied by derivation:
000105
- C. Berk
---
## Page 108
82
Classification: -
SERTET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
WashingtorronDClagrerplleph@cuuedet controlled
conditions, accessible to the Commission. Giving
due consideration to the CIA's serious concern
for protecting its sources, the fact that A-l's
status was not disclosed prevented the Warren
Commission from exercising a possible option,
i.e. to take the sworn testimony of A-l as it
concerned Oswald and the Kennedy assassination.
On this issue, as the written record tends to
show, the Agency unilaterally rejected the possibility
of exercising this option.
In light of the establishment of A-l's
bona fides, •
• his
proven reliability and his depth of knowledge of
Cuban intelligence activities, this option might
well have been considered by the Warren Commission.
The AMASH Operation (to be ine gorated into criticism directed
During 1967, the CIA's Inspector General
issued
a report which examined CIA supported
assassination plots. Included in this report
was discussion of the CIA-Mafia plots and an
Classification:
Classified by derivation:
000106
---
## Page 109
- 83 -
Classification: -
SECRET,
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from CIA - controlled documents.)
Agency project referred to as the AMLASH
operation) (CIA Inspector General Report 1967
pp. 1-74, 78-112). The AMLASH operation involved
a high level Cuban official (assigned the CIA
cryptonym AMLASH/1) who, during 1962 while meeting
with a CIA representative expressed the desire to
assassinate Fidel Castro (Ibid., p. 84) ,
As a
result of AMLASH's expressed objective and the
CIA's
desire to find a viable political alternative
to the Castro regime, the Agency subsequently
provided AMLASH with both moral and material
22%
22
support designed to depose Fidel Castro
Ibid.,
pp. 80-94)
The AMLASH operation was
terminated
Dy the CIA in 1965 as the result of security leaks.
(Ibia. pp. 104-106)
During 1965, AMLASH and his
conspirators were brought to trial in Cuba for plotting
against Castro. AMLASH was sentenced to death, but
at Castro's request the sentence was reduced to
twenty-five years imprisonment.
(Ibid. pp. 107-110)
In its examination of the AMLASH operation
the 1967 IGR concluded that the CIA had offered both
direct and indirect support for AMLASH's plotting (Ibía.
222
22$.
Classification:
000107
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 110
229
84 -
Classification: SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
The most striking example of the CIA's direct
offer of support to AMLASH reported by the
1967 IGR states
"it is likely that at the very
moment President Kennedy was shot a CIA officer
was meeting with a Cuban agent in Paris and giving
him an assassination device for use against CASTRO."
(Ibia 227
The 1967 IGR offered no firm evidence confirming
or refuting Castro's knowledge of the AMLASH operation
prior to the assassination of President Kennedy. The
1967 IGR did note that in 1965 when AMLASH was
tried in Havan come
press reports of Cuban knowledge
Of AMLASH's association with the CIA weredated from
November 1964, approximately one year after President
Kennedy's assassination
(Ioid. p. 1Il).
The Church Committee in Book V of its Final
Report examined the AMLASH operation in great detail.
((SSC, Book.V, pp. 2-7, 67-691
\ The Church Committee
concluded:
The AMLASH plot was more relevant to the
warren Commision work than the early CIA
assassination plots with the underworld.
Unilke those earlier plots, the AMLASH
Classification: -
000108
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 111
Classification: stepfat.
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from CIA controlled documents.)
operation was in progress at the time
of the assassination; unlike the earlier
plots, the AMLASH operation could
clearly be traced to the CIA; and
unlike the earlier plots, the CIA had
endorsed AMLASH's proposal for a coup,
the first step to him being Castro's
assassination, despite Castro's threat
to retaliate for such plotting. No one
directly involved in either investigation
(i.e. the CIA and the FBI) was told of
the AMLASH operation. No one investi-
gated a connection between the AMLASH
operation
and President Kennedy's
assassination. Although Oswald had been
in contact with pro-Castro and anti-
Castro groups for many months before the
assassination, the CIA did not conduct
a thorough investigation of questions
of Cuban government or Cuban exile
involvement in the assassination.
(Ibid. p.
5)
Classification:
000109
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 112
86 -
Classification: -
SECREI
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
In 1977, the CIA issued a second Inspector
General's Report concerning the subject of CIA
sponsored assassination plots. This Report, in
large part, was intended as a rebuttal of the
Church Committee's findings. The 1977 IGR states:
The Report (of the Church Committee)
assigns it (the AMLASH operation)
characteristics that it did not have
during the period preceding the assassina-
tion of JFK in order to support the SSC
view that it should have been reported
to the Warren Commissioni
(1977 IGR p. 2)
The 1977 IGR concluded that prior to the
assassination of President Kennedy, the AMLASH
operation was not an assassination plot.
Nevertheless, the 1977 IGR did state:
It would have served to reinforce the
of the matter of normal avenue of
The CIA, too, could
what most then saw in general térms--
the possibility of soviet or Cuban
Involvement in the assassination
because of the tensions of the time.
It is not enough to be able to point
234
Classification:
000110
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 113
The
Classification: -
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
to erroneous, criticisms made today.
initiatives
initiatige hour sale talen aroader
CIA employees at the time felt-as
they obviously did--that the activities
about which they knew/had no relevance
to the Warfen Commission inquiry does
not take the place of a record of
conscious review. (Ibid. p. 17)
Richard Helms, as the highest level CIA
employee in contact with the Warren Commission on
a regular basis, testified to the Rockefeller
Commission that he did not believe the AMLASH
operation was relevant to the investigation of
President Kennedy's death. (Rockefeller Commission,
Testimony of Richard Helms, 4/24/75 pp. 389-391,392)
In addition, Mr. Helms testified before this
Committee that the AMLASH operation was not designed
to be an assassination plot lExec. Sess. Test. of/
Richard Helms, 8/9/78, PP. 26-27).
A contrasting view to the testimony of Mr.
233
Helms was offered by Joseph Langosch who in 1963
was the Chief of Counterintelligence for the CIA's Special~
Special Affairs Staff was the CIA component
Affai
Staff
responsible for CIA operations directed against
the Government of Cuba and the Cuban Intelligence
Services (HSCA Class. Affidavit of Joseph Langosch,
Classification:
Classified by derivation 0 00111
---
## Page 114
ElassifeatigA: —
secret
This form is 18
.234
Sept. 14, 1978, P. L) The Special Affairs Staff
was headed by Desmond FitzGerald and was responsible
for the AMLASH operation (SSC, Book V, pp. 3, 8, 79)
Langosch, as the Chief of Counterintelligence
for the Special Affairs Staff, was responsible for
safeguarding SAS against penetration by foreign
intelligence services, particularly the Cuban
Intelligence Services
(HSCA Classified Affidavit
of Joseph Langosch, 9/14/78, p. 3). It was
Langosch's recollection that:
... the AMLASH operation prior to the
assassination of President Kennedy was
characterized by the Special Affairs
staff, Desmond Fitzgerald (sic) and other
senior CIA officers as an assassination
operation initiated and sponsored by the
CIA.
VIbid., P.
1209949023
Langosch further recollected that as of 1962
it was highly possible that the Cuban Intelligence
Services were aware of AMLASH and his association
with the CIA and that the information upon which
he based his conclusion that the AMLASH
operation was insecure was available to
officials, including Desmond FitzGerald.
Ibid., p.
However, the issue before this Committee is
Classification: =
2000631
Slaiied by deryation: -
000112
C. Berk
---
## Page 115
Erassitication: -
seoret
This form is to be ysed for material
extracted
-88a-
*In response to Langosch's sworn statements, this
Committee has received from the CIA an affidavit
executed by Kent I. Pollock (CIA pseudonym) who "served
as Executive Officer for Desmond FitzGerald during the
entire period in which he was Chief of the Special Affairs
Staft...and discusse& With him the AMLASH operation as it
, Affidavit of Kent l. Pollock,
197p. 1) Mr. Pollock specifically
contested Langosch's assertion that the AMLASH operation
was characterized by the Special Affairs Staff, Desmond
FitzGerald, and other senior level CIA officials as an
assassination operation.
In pertinent part, Pollock
drew the following conclusions:
To the best of my knowledge, Mr. FitzGerald
considered
the AMLASH operation to be a political
action activity with the objective of organizing
a group within Cuba to overthrow Castro and the
Castro regime by means of a coup d'etat.
I heard
Mr. FitzGerald discuss the AMLASH operation
frequently, and never heard him characterize it as
an "assassiantion operation." Mr. FitzGerald
stated within my hearing on several occasions
his awareness that coup d'etat often involves
loss of life. (Ibid., par. 3, p. 2)
He also stated:
Desmond FitzGerald did not characterize the AMLASH
operation as an
"assassigntion operation"; the
case officer did not; I, as Executive Officer, never
discussed any aspect of the AMIASH operation with
Joseph H. Langosch; the Deputy Chief, the other
branch chiefs and
the special assistants could not
have so characterized it since they did not know
about the pen (the pen was specially fitted with a
hypodermic syringe in response to urgings by AMLAsh
for a means to start the coup by killing Castro.)
The case officer offered the pen to AMLASH on the day
of President Kennedy's death.
AMLASH rejected the
pen with disdain. /Ibid., par. 4, p. 2/), (Ibid.,
par. 6, p. 3)
Classification: :
000113
2060635
Chasified ax derivation: -
---
## Page 116
Classification: —
SEGRET
not simply WhetHers th bentlast meterit on wed
from ClA-controlled documents.*
was an
assassination plot prior to President Kennedy's
death.
The broader and more significant issue,
as the 1977 IGR has identified it, is whether
the AMLASH operation was of sufficient relevancy
to have been reported to the Warren Commission.
In the case of the AMLASH operation this
determination is a most difficult matter to
resolve. Reasonable men may differ in their
characterization of the Agency's operational
objectives.
Based upon the presently available evidence
it is the Comnittee's position that such informa-
tion, if made available to the Warren Commission,
might have stimulated the Commission's investiga-
tive
corcern for possible Cuban involvement or
complicity in the assassination. As J. Lee Rankin
commented before this Committee:
...when I read.."the Church Committee's
report-it was
an ideal situation for
them to just pick out any way they
wanted to tell the story and fit it
in with the facts that had to be met
and then either blame the rest of it
on somebody else or not tell any more
or polish
it off. I don't think that
Classification:
SECRET
000114
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 117
- 90
Classification: -
SECRET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
could have happened back in 1964.
I think there would have been a
much better chance of getting to
the heart of it.
It might have
onLy revealed that we are involved
in it and who approved it and all
238
that.
But I think that would
have-atleast come.out. (HSCA Class.
Depo. of J. Lee Rankin, 8/17/78, p.91)
The Committee is in agreement with Mr. Rankin
that had the AMLASH operation been disclosed to
the Warren Commission, the Commission might have
been able to foreclose the speculation and conjecture
that has surrounded the AMLASH operation during
the past decade. As history now records, the AMLASH
operation remains a footnote to the turbulent
relations between Castro's Cuba and the United States.
Clasificion: 338//T.
000115
Classified by derivation:
---
## Page 118
Classification:
ET
(This form is to be used for material extracted
from ClA-controlled documents.)
Cover Sheet
The attached package of paper is the property of
the House Select-Committee on Assassinations,
and is
on loon to CIA under an agreement whereby CIA is not
to reproduce of copy the diaft or any portion thereof.
and
Notes may be taken on materials in this package,
rough notes may be prepared as a basis for informal
and oral exchanges with HSCA representatives.
These
notes, however;
are to be held as though controlled and
are to be destroyed under agreed conditions with HSCA.
They are not to
oe copied
or excerpted and are to be
heid
until further instructions are received lor
• eventual disposal.
and
papers have been numbered for accountability
receipted accordingly. They are to be handled on
an secure
on a need-tot
though constituting sensitive papers
now basis.
REPRODISTON
1N
Copy 250F 42
Classification:
Classified by derivation:
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10173-10155.pdf | 104-10173-10155 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 10/13/1966 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | JMWAVE | PLANS FOR MAKING FILM PURPORTING TO SHOW EFFORTS OF HAITIANS TO OVERTHROW PRESIDENT FRANCOIS DUVALIOR. | 3 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK64-9 : F2 : 1998.02.24.17:36:53:936102 : | 3 | ## Page 1
104-10173-10155
REPORT COVER SHEET
SECRET
exPosT w).
•nosect databan 1886
201-251853
PROCESSINA ACTION
MADRED POR ANORRIS
ORDELINS REQUIRED.
ICS DISRENATION
TOCH O/CHINATiON
PALAP GO FINAND
DISTRIDUTION
- Jia.
Port-aw-Priner 16: "8
1263o DO 16: 10
Man nege of:
USCS
Culton
DYYOUR IMPALA PERUKER
SOURCES ANDENIA-1, UnO SOl the laforsation la pare rapa l
Soon Andrew STe GLORit:
RID: Please cros
ace to:
201-002705 (Andren ST. CORGID:
201-042669
(Rolando MASTERRER ROja»"
RETURN TO CIA
Baokground Use Only.
Do Nọt Reproduce.
one tie boredat
Inclided fine
no Declosificatie,
201-251853
1801
TE 1467:
УдД
---
## Page 2
FIELD INFORMATION REPORT
CASA O SOURC a como rotono donato computenci
B04l0d s40e0st
Balse
6 Cornos De andena,
CONFIDEATIAL
CONTROLLES DISSES
NO FORCIGN: DISSEY
REPORT NA.
DATE OF REPORT • 12 0ot 66
NO PAGEE
REFERENCES
COUNTRY Haiti/Cuba
SUBJECT
Plars for jaking Fila Purporting
To Show Efforts
of Haitians To
Ovorthrow President Francole
Lavalior
DATÊ OF
27. Saptenbor 1986
INFO.
PLACE &
Unatca statos
Hian.
DATE ARA: (5 COODON "95E)
UFC 0588
SOURCES
A prominent Cuban caigro,
His reports concerning emigre
affairs have been accurato.
Fiere Conment.
TDCSDB-325/02687-66, 22 Suptember 1966,
ported"
statements by folando lasferrer lojas, former Cuban:
cenator, doscribing what he called plans for detton rainst
laiti fron the Doninican Republie.
According to other inton,
peto no pied sa phe had enno prensi coreo a
permission from
Macferror to maxe a
fiin for the Colundia Sroadcasting Systen
concerning the activitios of the Mesferrer group with respoet
to a7
Invasion of Haiti to be mounted fros the
Doninican
Republic®
Soe also IDCSDD-315/02686-66, 22 Septenber 1966,
which reported on plans for moving the
schoonor. POOR RICHARD
Floridas
to Dinner Key
Marina,
Yitchel] Livingston Worbell III with the vessel. Herbola
vassel
caid that họ hađ beco
•Systes (CBs) to produce & 90-minute docurentany fila an the
e foras of the Haitian Catholie moverent to everthros the
zovcrent of Prosidont Francois Duvalier of Uaiti®
St.
said that the filn mas to be radé in the Miani area
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED DISSEY
NO FORZIGN DISSEY
Enstante 5prs
D.STR.@0T.5
---
## Page 3
1d-0000
2..
• COHTIDEITIAL
CONTROLLED
DISCI
GO FORCIG: DISSEM
UrG -$503
assistant producer, with day richullen, cos executive as
producer.
According to st. Gorgo,
all the necessary
such as weipons, boats, motors, and ottur equip-
meat.
had Soca acguirod..
The schooner 200k RICHlaD and two
small Loston whalers nould be usad in tho filu.
St. George
said that the only fiining cono 50 far has
footage taken of a
veadoo dance in a Miami bistro.
St. George end his grown vere in
dircet touch with Rolandp
Masferror Rojas and
two of his sadistanes.
St. Gcorso has had
nu:drous contacts with cusan enigne: croups, including.
Representacion
Cuban Reprosentation
in Exilo),
tha Asociacion facionalista Cuband LANC, Cuban:
rationalist Association), and the new Cooriinacion
de Fucrzas
o* forces).
in connoction with the filt.
Field Comment
1..
for inforsation on the creation by RECE of Coordinacion
de Fuerzas,
see UFG-8589.
With regard to Source's infor
nation, above, that no haitians are involved, see
UFG-8589, in which another sounce reports the involvement
of Father Jean Baptiste Georges, prominent Haitian emigre
Georges has been reported earther as working wite
Masferrer®
See, for example, IDCSDB-315/002?5-66, 80
January 1966;
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10121-10379.pdf | 104-10121-10379 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 5/10/68 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CECIL TIGHE, OS/SRS | CI/R&A | REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN GARRISON INVESTIGATION OF ASSASSINATION OF KENNEDY. | 3 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK44 : F4 : 1997.11.02.10:59:55:106107 : | 3 | ## Page 1
104-10121-10379
SEGlET
(
10 MAY 1958
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Cecil TIGHE
OS/SRS
4E13
SUBJECT
Request for Information
1.
Request information on the following individuals who
are involved in the Garrison Investigation of the Assassination of
Prefident Kennedy:
a. Jim BISHOP
b.. Wayne COOK
c. James Herbert MARTIN
d. Bcujamin SONNENBERG
Edgar B. STERN and wif
1. William WOOD
.2.. Jim BISHOP
a.. A Jim BISHOP was the author
of a three-part.
article on Jim Garrison which appeared in the Seattle, Washington
Post-Intelligencer:
b. RID/INDEX references to OS files: Janca Francia
BISHOP, DOOB: 14 March 1937,, Chicago, Illinole (0S| - 192169):
Jamon Howard BISHOP, DIOB: 3 January 1937, Gallowya, Ohio:
Jaines Clarence BISHOP (OS# - 57262).
Are any of these three identifiable with the newspaperman?
3. Wayne COOK
a. Leslic Norman BRADLEY claimed that he flew
from Wichita, Kansas to New Orleans on 23 November 1963
with a pilot named Wayne COOK. i In March 1968 COOK was
attending pilot-training classes for Pan American Airways at
Sin Mateo, California (FBI rcport) •
b. RID/INDEX references to OS files:
Wayne Birner COOK, DPOB: 22 August 1237,
Iroeno, California (OSt - 235139)
DIOU
SCHIE
---
## Page 2
SECRET
Wayne Augustus COOK, DPOB: 22 April 1932,
Kingman, Arizonia (OS# - 389652)
Is either of these men identifiable with the pilot..
1.
James Herbert MARTIN
a. James Herbert MARTIN, a motel manager in Dalla:,
Iexas became the "business manager" of Marina OSWALD after
the assassination. MARTIN had lived in Dallas since 1956
(Warren Commission Report)
b. RID/INDEX reference to OS files:
James MARTIN, cit USA?, location: Los Angelea
James H. MARTIN, 'CSC list 1-30-13, p-128
5. Benjamin SONNENBERG
a. On the acknowledgment page of his book Rush to
Judgenient Mark LANE states:
"I am deeply indehted to
Benjamin SONNENBERG, Jr. Whose numerous and invaluabio
suggestions have found there way into this volume."
b. RID traces indicate that a Benjamin SONNENBERG
was President of the Public Relations Council in New York City
in 1952 and later President of Publicity Consultants Incorporated.
One FBI report indicates that in 1938 Alfred K. STERN guazanteed
a bank loan made to SONNENBERG.
24
/6. Edgar B. STERN and wife
a. According to Jack N. ROGERS, the committee
counsel for the Joint Legislative Committee on Un-Amorican
Activities of the Statc of Louisiana, Jim Garrison has been.
recciving "contributions and monetary support" from Mis.
Edgar B. STERN:
b. RID tracus indicate that Mrs. Edgar B. STERN Sr.
of New Orleans is a danghtor of Julius ROSENWALD. Thie
would nake her à sister-in-law of Altred K. STERN. Edgar
Bloom STERN Jr. is apparently a New Orleans TV station owner.
SECRET
---
## Page 3
SECRET
24
7. William WOOD (aka William BOXLEY)
• a. A Bill WOOD is alleged to have been conducting
investigations in Dallas for Jim Garrison. He has used the
alias Bill BOXLEY. Hc 1 possibly identical with William
Clarence WOOD Ji. who allegedly had resigned from the
Agency becauso of a "drinking problem" (DOS report, HOU-80-6B,
26 April 1968, out copy Indicated you receivod i copy)
b. According to other information we have, a William
WOOD of Waco, Texas was the Office of Personnel recruiter
who covered the New Orleans area in 1963. Is there any connection?
Sanes
W. Dealer
James W. Kesler
CI/R&A
3
SECHET
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 144-10001-10217_docid_6606966_binary_sealed.pdf | 144-10001-10217 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | NSA | 5/8/81 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | Stanley Brand | OGC | JFK related… | 23 | NSA | JFK | 2/8/18 | 23 | ## Page 1
Doe ID: 6606966
DATE: 12/10/97
PAGE: 1
JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : NSA
RECORD NUMBER : 144-10001-10217
RECORDS SERIES :
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR :
NSA
FROM
OGC
TO : STANLEY BRAND
JFK RELATED MATERIAL AND DOCUMENTS RELEASED PREVIOUSLY TO THE COMMITTE
PAGES : 25/08/81
SUBJECTS
VARIOUS JFK LETTERS
DOCUMENT TYPE : MEMORANDA, LETTERS
CLASSIFICATION
RESTRICTIONS
: 1A-
CURRENT STATUS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/12/97
OPENING CRITERIA
ORIGINATING AGENCY'S DETERMINATION REQUIRED
COMMENTS :
IR] - ITEM IS RESTRICTED
Released on 11-01-2017 under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2017 Note)
---
## Page 2
LAO
• Dóc ID: 6606966
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755
Serial:
GC/305/81
13
May 1981
Mr. Stanley Brand
General Counsel
Office of the Clerk
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Brand:
Pursuant to our conversation of ll May, enclosed please
correspondence or records of communications between NSA and
the House Select Committee on Assassinations.
The documents
were released as the result of an initial request and prior
to our knowledge of congressional intent that this information
be maintained in confidentiality.
Future requests of this nature will be handled in accordance
with expressed congressional intent; we would appreciate receiving,
however, a letter addressed to this Agency specifying current
congressional views with respect to the information maintained
by NSA.
If you have any questions do not hesitate to call me or
Robin Ullman
688-6054.
Sincerely,
ratricia murphy
PATRICIA A. MURPHY
FOIA Appeals
Coordinator
Encl:
a/s
Released on 11-01-2017 under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2017 Note)
162-3-2
And Does. If
---
## Page 3
Doc ID: 6606966
Serial: N9187
CC:
D/DIR
ExReg (less encl.)
GC
D1
L22211 (less
encl.)
Stanley Brand, General Counsel, Clerk of the House
of Representatives
M/R: This
response was coordinated with Q4 (Dinwoodie) on
classification and with Stan Brand, General Counsel to the
Clerk of the House of
Representatives in determining whether
correspondence originating with the House Select Committee
on Assassinations are NSA records.
Mr. Brand informed us of
correspondence from Louis Stokes to Executive Agencies that
congressional material and related information in a form connected
to the Committee should not be disclosed without the written
concurrence of the House of Representatives.
A subsequent letter
from the Clerk of the House affirmed this decision.
He told us
that he believes the Committee inadvertently neglected to send
the
Stokes letter to NSA.
Copies of both letters are attached for
your information, and, for LAO, your file.
As Q4 had already released the NSA-originated records (not
knowing about the Stokes request), we decided to uphold their
findings.
Future requests of this
nature should be handled in
accordance with the Stokes and Henshaw letters.
If any documents
covered by these letters are to be released they must first be
coordinated with
and approved by Stan Brand, General Counsel
to the Clerk of the House of Representatives. His phone
number
is 225-7000.
Mark Allen has sued CIA under the FOIA for withholding
information responsive to a similar reguest.
The D.C. Circuit
in November 1980 remanded that case to the District Court, .
but made some rulings on the (b) (1) and (b) (3) exemptions
which we have
tried
alia,
showing procedural conformity with E.O. 12065,
demonstrating
which exemptions the deleted information fall
under
and why, and releasing
classification markings.
PATRICIA
Patricia Murphy
MURPHY, OGC, 50475,
May 81, pad
ASCA-1-Bholson
3-7
Pennedy Coder If
---
## Page 4
Doc+D: 6606966,a. -2
+80-8 811-18-8110.81
a-.-.
1002.1657
MAD 8.111.
1. M.!He
MDIRSD.PIIGIDT9
(702) 229-0620
Beleel Commiller on Signosinaliens
U.S. House ol Sirportinialiurs
SILS HOUSE UITICEHUILDING. ANNEXE
W'ASHINGTON. D.G. 20315
March 26, 1979
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the
U.S.
Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20530
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
As you
are aware, H. Res. 222,
as passed by the House
of Representatives
on February
2, 1977, authorized the Select
Committee on Assassinations
to
investigate the deaths of
Dr. Martin Luther King, ur. ano
The committee's work
1s now drawina to an eno.
president John i write
Kennedy.
this
letter to
draw to your attention a matter that I recognize
will inevitably come up in the future.
A great deal of material
has been generated by your
Department in
response to specific requests or concerns of
the Select Committee.
In
addition, your Department is in
physical custody of
a variety of materials originating from
the Select Committee.
It can be anticipated that your Depart-
ment will receive requests under the Freedom of Information
Act for
access
to these
materials.
The purpose of this
letter
is to request specifically
that this Congressional material
and related
information in a form connected
to the Committee
not be
disclosed outside your Department without the written
concurrence of the House of Representatives.
Sincerely,
LS: dm
cc: Robert L. Keuch
---
## Page 5
"I'boat: 60d066 34
Crit
an. Jongmand Colleg
Toys 51rd
Offire nf the Clerk
215 House of Braresculaties
Jasjinglon, 2.0L 20515
March 2, 1981
Honorable William H. Webster
Federal Bureau of
Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
washington, D.C. 20535
Dear MI. Webster:
I am writing to you concerning a subject of considerable
concern to me as the legislative branch officer charged with
naintaining and pieserving non-current House docunents and
records under the rules
and precedents of the House of
Representatives.
Specifically, I call your attention to
requests
filed with the Bureau
under the Freedom of Informa-
Lion Act for correspondence,
records or any communications
between the Bureau and the former House Select Committee on
Assassinations ('HSCA").
By letter dated March 26, 1979
to the Honorable Griffin
Bell, former
Chairman Stokes specifically identified the
problem which would result from requests under the Freedom
of Information Act for material generated by the Bureau in
response to specific requests by HSCA during its
investiga-
tion.
That letter requested that "this congressional material
and related information in a form connected to the Committee
not be disclosed outside your Department."
for the House of SCA's records.
General Counsel has generally. reviewed
materials and has determined that none
materials can be released consistent with the letter from
Chairman Stokes asserting the exemption for Congress under
5 U.S. C. 5551(1) (4) (1976). This is our position notwith-
standing
the recent decision of a panel
of the United States
---
## Page 6
Doc ID: 66d6866orable tll12am
lebster
rage L
Court of Appeals in Holy Spirit Association For The Unifica-
tion of World Christianity v.
Central Intelligence Agency,
2202 (D.C.
Cir. Dec.
Nehe ring Trich, Let 2, to shee with sta
23, 1980), petition 10r
We strongly believe that
Chairman Stoke's
reaffirmation by
this letter, comes squarely within the standards
articulated
in the Holy Spirit case,
request and any litigation which might arise therefrom, iwo
factors cited by the panel in Holy Spirit as absent.
As constitutional officer of the House chaiged with
preservation of House records, I cannot overemphasize the
importance of maintaining the
strictest confidentiality over
records
generated by
as
well
as
copies of
congressional materials retained by the Bureau, in connection
with HSCA. While I believe
that these letters
adequately
serve to support the withholding of any of these documents
under FOlA,
I would appreciate being informed of any such
requests.
this regard, please have appropriate personnel
in the processing sections
contact my General Counsel concein-
ing equests for HSCA materials.
Edmunda Menohaw.)
EDMUND L. HENSHAW, JR.,
U.S. House of Representative
---
## Page 7
Doc ID: 6606966
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE
FORT GEORGE G. MADE, MARYLAND 20735
Serial: N9187
11 May 1981
Mr. Mark Allen
P.0. Box 9032
Washington, D.C. 20003
Dear Mr. Allen:
This replies to your letter of 8 April 1981 in which you
appeal the National Security Agency's (NSA) denial of information
responsive to your
Freedom of Information Act request.
I have
reviewed your initial request of 12 January 1981, the nine records
located in response to that request, NSA's letter of 16 March
1981 which forwarded one record in its entirety and portions of
eight other records, and your letter of appeal. As the result
of this review, I am again sending you the releasable portions
of eight documents and I
am'referencing herein the laws that
preclude disclosure of certain segments of these documents.
I
have also decided to release additional portions of three records
that were released to you by the Chief, Office of Policy, and
amended copies
of those records are attached.
However,
I affirm
the determination of the Chief, Office of Policy, that the
remaining portions of the attached records must be withheld.
The ninth document, an unclassified letter from
Eugene Yeates
to Robert Blakey dated 14 July 1978 was released to you in its
entirety and
therefore does not need to be addressed.
Set forth below are descriptions of the
eight
records which
were
withheld in part and the reasons for withholding those
portions of them.
The reasons for withholding are
as responsive
as possible without disclosing
classified information.
The U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has recognized that
information disclosed by an agency about withheld documents does
not have to contain facts
that if made public would compromise
the secret nature of the information.
App. D.C.
977
(1974).
Document. No./
Description
Attachment 1
Date
9 Dec 77
Attachment 2
7 Jul 78
Attachment 3
9 Aug 78
- Exemption (s)
5 U.S.C. 5552(b) (3): applicable
statute Public Law 86-36, (50
U.S.C. $402 note)
5 U.S.C. 5552(b) (1); 5 U.S.C. 5552
(b) (3):
applicable statute Public
Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. $402 note)
5 U.S.C. 8552(b) (1): 5 U.S.C. 8552
(b) (3):
applicable statutes Public
Law 86-36, (50 U.S.C. §402 note)
and 50 U.S.C. 8403(d) (3) 0r18
U.S.C. $798
---
## Page 8
Doc ID: 6606966
Attachment 4
10 NOV 78
5 U.S. C. 5552(b)(1): 5 U.S.C. $552
(b) (3):
applicable statutes Public
Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. $402 note) and
50 U.S.C. 5403(d)(3) 01 18 U.S.C.
$798; 5 U.S. C. 5552(0) (6)
Attachment 5
21 Nov 78
5 U.S.C. C. 5552(b)(1); 5 U.S.C. S552
(b) (3):
applicable statutes Public
Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. 5402 note) and
50 U.S.C. 5403(8) (3) 01 18 U.S.C.
$798; 5 U.S. C. 5552(b) (6)
Attachment 6
21 NOV 78
Attachment
7
28 NOV 78
5 U.S.C. C. 5552(b)(1);5 U.S.C. §552
(b) (3):
applicable statutes Public
Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. $402 note) and
50 U.S.C. 5403(8) (3) 0118 U.S.C.
$798; 5 U.S. C. 5552(0) (6)
5 U.S. C. 8552(5) (1); 5 U.S.C. 5552
(b) (3):
applicable statutes Public
Law 86-36, (50 U.S.C. §402 note) and
50 U.S.C. 8403(d) (3) 0r 18 U.S.C.
$798
Attachment 8
28 Nov 78
5 U.S. C. 5552(b) (1); 5 U.S.C. $552
(b) (3):
applicable statutes Public
Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. $402 note) and
50 U.S.C. 5403(d) (3) 01 18 U.S.C.
$798: 5 U.S. C. 8552(0) (6)
A more detailed explanation of the rationale for each exemption follows:
With
respect to the classifications assigned to the portions
of documents 2 through 8
being withheld, I have concluded that
they meet the criteria for classification in Section 1-3 of Executive
Order 12065 and
in paragraph 2-202 of DoD Regulation 5200.1-R and
that the withheld portions
are properly classified in their entirety
within the categories provided in Section 1-1 of Executive Order
12065 and in Chapter I, Section 5 of DoD Regulation 5200.1-R.
records have
been reviewed for possible declassification or down-
grading
according to the provisions of sections 3-1 and
3-3 of
Executive Order
of Chapter III of DoD Regulation 5200. 1-R.
Portions that were declassified
are enclosed; the remaining portions
were found to
be properly classified and therefore excluded from
declassification or downgrading despite the length of time which
origin. In conducting
this review, I
have weighed the significant need for openness
in government against
security at this time.
I have specifically taken into account Section
3-303 of Executive
Order 12065 and have determined that the records, except for the
portions released, should continue to be classified. Thus, I finc
2
---
## Page 9
Doc ID: 6606966
that the Chief, Office of Policy, properly found these portions
to be exempt from release pursuant to 5 U.S.C. $552(b) (1), and I
affirm his denial
of your request for release of these portions
on those grounds.
Portions of each of the eight documents are exempt fiom
disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. $552(b) (3).
Section 6 of Public
Law 86-36 provides that no law
shall be construed to require
the disclosure of
the organization, personnel, functions or
activities of the National Security Agency.
Each of
the
records contains information falling
into
this description.
The National Security Agency
is precluded by 18 U.S.C. $798
from providing information concerning classified communications
intelligence activities except to those persons authorized to
receive such
information.
50 U.s.c. 8403(d) (3) protects infor-
mation pertaining to intelligence
Withheld
portions of documents 3 through 8 contain information protected
by these statutes.
Enclosure 6 of DOD Directive 5400.7 (32
C.F.R.
$286 (1980)) specifically recognizes 18 U.S.C. $798
and
Public Law 86-36 as exemption 3 statutes.
Thus, I also find that
the Chief, Office of Policy, properly concluded
that portions of
the documents were exempt from release pursuant to 5 U.s.C.
5552 (b)(3), since each of the statutes and the directive cited
above provides adequate grounds upon which to base such an
exemption.
In addition, portions of documents 4, 5, 6 and
8 relating
to one individual
exempt pursuant to 5 U.S. C. $552(b) (6)
due to
certain unique circumstances
involved. I have determined
that disclosure would constitute a "clearly unwarranted invasion
of personal
privacy," for this individual.
With the exception of the one document released in its
entirety
and the portions of the other documents that were
released, I found
the matter
covered by your request clearly
within
the statutory protection and exemptions cited
above.
proper protection
classified information and intelligence
sources and methods requires a denial of the remaining portions
of the documents.
Finally four documents originated by Congress, one of
which
was a Memorandum
of Understanding between the House
Select Committee on Assassinations and the Office of the
Secretary of Defense and attached
to document 5, were
found
not to be agency records and
are therefore not subject to the
Freedom of Information Act. Possession of a document does not
dictate that it is an
"agency record" but rather whether control
of the document has passed from Congress and become property of
the agency within which it resides.
See Goland v. CIA, 607 F.2d
339 (D.C. Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927 (1980). As you
already know, when the House Select Committee on Assassinations
disbanded, Chairman Stokes informed
former Attorney General
Griffin Bell that the Congressional
materials and related
information connected to the Committee should be held in
confidentiality.
That assertion of Congressional privilege
has been recently reaffirmed
by the Congress.
3
---
## Page 10
Doc ID: 6606966
As your appeal is denied in part, you are hereby advised
of your rights
under 5 U.s.C. 5552 to seek judicial review.
You
may seek an order
from a United States Court in the district in
which you reside, in which you have your principal place of
business, or
in which
this Agency's records are situated (U.S.
District Court, District of Maryland), or in the District of
Columbia, for the production of any Agency records which you
consider
to have been improperly withheld by this Agency.
5 U.S.C. 5552(a) (4) (B) sets out your
rights in this matter
with respect to such judicial action.
Sincerely,
ANN CARACRISTraCisti
Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act
Appeals Authority
Encls:
a/s
---
## Page 11
dc ID: 6606966
Legislative Affairs
9De 77
To: DIR
THRO: D DIR
He Assasinations Committe
1. The Diguty Clif Crunal
Aà Assasinidins Chintee, Mr. 5.
Wrey called to say he is sanding
a litter to D1R. Letter, do be
disfil Monday, will request
cortain informatin (unziciel)
1 OSA.
I Possidat Kenny o les. King.
---
## Page 12
2
Doc ID: 6606966
OAFT
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Phone Call from House
7 July 1978
Select Committee on Assassinations
This office received a phone call this date from a staffer
of the House Select Committee on Assassinations who said the
address a letter to NSA.
the letter would be on its way shortly.
Legislative Affairs
LAO
CC :
DIR
D/DIR
GC
prodies
1376
---
## Page 13
Doc ID: 6606966
NATIONAL SECUTITY AGENCY
CENTRAL SECURITY SEPVICE
FORT GIORC"". PiLADI. MARYLAND 20755
Serial:
1A0/025-78
9 August 1978.
"SECRETi
MEMORANDUM FOR THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY AND
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
ATTN: Ms. Judith A. Miller
SUBJECT: House Select Committee on Assassinations 10 July 1978
Request
1. NSA has made a thorough search of all records that
might contain information relevant to the Select Committee on
Assassinations' request for
"telegrans or other communications,
sent from Cobo Cleaners in Detroit, Michigan, by Earl Ruby
any other individuals to Cuba in March and April 1962."
2.
If no other
component of DoD has located information pursuant to the Comnittee's
request, propose you use the attached draft as your response
to the Committee.
If, however, there is any reason why the
attached draft cannot be used, please consult with MI. Silver
before releasing information in any other form.
3.
The attached draft response is classified CONFIDENTIAL.
A direct response from the National securitiency to the
Committee's request
because the availabilennon saint the type of
information requested by the Commitee
and protected in e
Acting Chief
Legislative Affairs
Incl:
a/s
Copy Furnished:
DOD General Counsel
Faringi too 505. l0 1ild. 6ri 3
*HOLE VA SOME PHONE ENV
533169
47°
---
## Page 14
L822A5T
bir. G. Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
Select Committee on Assassinations
U.
S. House of Representatives.
331 House Office Building, Annex 2
Washington, DC 20515
Dear MI. Blakey:
This is in reply to your recent letter which reguested from
the Department of Defense certain information relating to Cobo Cleaners
and Mr. Earl Ruby in March and April 1962.
The Department of Defense has conducted a thorough search of
its records and e
The above information is classified CONFIDENTIAL because it
relates to Department of Defense intelligence operations and must
not be disclosed to unauthorized individuals. In addition, you must
not reveal the Department of Defense of any Defense Agency as the
source of this information.
Sincerely,
F DRAFT
John G. Kester
The Special Assistant
Candied by DIRNSAICHESS INSAICSIN IN A
ERDOpe fiRE GDS, EO 11852, Calagary?
Dectersiy Urn Molitiaiion Dy Sha Dristato
INDENTIA
HERAFT
---
## Page 15
Dóc ID: 6606966
CC :
DIR
D/DIR
GC
DDO
EXEC/DDO
Serial: 1A0-025-78
M/R: 1.
MI.
Blakey, Chief Counsel and Staff Director of the House
Select Committee on Assassinations, requested this information from
NSA on 10 July.
On 14 July, he was informed that, in accordance
with the MoU between DoD and the Committee, requests must go to
DOD not NSA.
'Ms. Judy Miller forwarded the Committee request to NSA.
Lanes
This memo has been coordinated with GC and EXEC/DDO.
The
classification was reviewed bysi
sand approved by D/DIR.
now =-.
SKORET
-MAHOLE VIA COMENT CLAMMIES OMIS
452 + 1944
---
## Page 16
4
•* Doc ID: 6606966
710019057594
10 November 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: 8 November Meeting with MI. Blakey
1.
On 8 November,
*visited Mr. Robert G. Blakey,
Chief Counsel and Staff Director for the House Select. Committee
information linking an assassination plot against President Kennedy
with a figure in organized crime.
MI. Blakey had been referred to
NSA (GC, Dan Silver) by Ms. Judy Miller, Special Assistant to
John Kester, OSD.
2.
Mr. Blakey indicated.that+
3 had
communicated with a friend of his named Sgt Michael B. Stevensen
at "Corry" Field, FLorida
3.
At that time,
sometime before November
mations 0949051
work
w-37-753-7771
as
wig referred in paragraph
stated thàt he hia no
did not know who the crime figure is.
Super so Sater actually Prate
273)
in his
4. Mr. Blakey stated that NSA had already acknowledged the
existence of such a facility during this period, but he didn't
indicate to whom such a statement had been made.
5. Mr. Blakey posed the following questions for NSA:
(a) What is NSA's capability for retrieving communications
from this time and place?
(b)
How quickly can we make this retrieval?
(His Committee completes its work in December. If
NSA can easily provide the answers to a number of
questions, he will do some preliminary investigation
before formally requesting the information, but if
we indicate that much time will be required, he will
task us now.)
(c) What additional information does NSA need from Mr.
Blakey to speed the retrieval process?
(d) Is the data still available for retrieval?
ow8+73976531
Ennistr
b00 bosstaces
42.
78
---
## Page 17
* Doc ID: 6606966
Ken
Was&
working for Praeter (Prater)i
and actually doing this kind of work
at that location during. that period? "
He asked for the responses, or at least, a status of what
can be provided and how soon, by Monday, 13 November.
" September, the General Counsel sent a copy of
meletter to
the FBI (GC/335/78), along with a letter
from AF Security Service (to which Sgt Stevensen had sent the letter).
In the General Counsels letter he noted that sect service was
8. On 9 November,
Band I met with Dan Silver and decided
Dan should respond initially to Mr.
Blakey's questions by phone.
After coordinating with EXEC/DDO,
Jasked
to provide input
for a response.
9.
of the availability of data from &
months 0F1963
conducted an initial review
covering the first eleven
• 0,
equert fune
eat
YEATES
EUGENE F.
Chief
Legislative Affairs
* NOLE VIA SOIRA GUINNE
---
## Page 18
Doc ID: 6606966
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
21 November 1978
SUBJECT: House Assassination Committee Inguiry
1.: On 17 November 1978, m
- GC, and I attended an
interview conducted by staff
members of the House Select Committee
on Assassinations in regard to the allegations off
concerning the involvement of certain: individuals in
the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. The interview was conducted by Messrs Kenneth Klein and
Gary Cornwell and was held in secure spaces prövided by Mr. George.
Murphy, director of the Senate National security office. Both
individuals are
The interview was conducted under terms of a Memorandum
of Understanding executed between the Committee and OSD on 15 November;
1978 (copy attached).
4. For purposes of the intervi
DoD made available Sgt.
Nicholas B. Stevenson SAFe
was
accompanied angerey raham, USAi
Sgt. Stevenson
USAF, ALI FOICE LegISLatIVe
Liaison.
5..
The Committee staffers were interested primarily in Sgt.
Stevenson's recollections in regard to events described by l
in a letter to Stevenson written in May 1978.
Sgt. Stevenson briefly described
Regarding
the specific allegations
3 relating to
the President's
assassination,
mst. Stevenson emphatically stated that he had no
no proba de us not been wilty on went ood it on
man and my tole in the interview was concentrated largey
on interpreting
rong quemphasing the fact that the
The staffers made no notes and agreed to let us review their
report; for purposes of classification, on or after 20 November 1978.
HANBLE MA COINT CHANNELS BY
---
## Page 19
Doc ID: 6606966
9. The staffers remain particularly interested in determining
the name of
the individual whom believes relates
to
the assassination.
They will explore means of determining this
all mation to include the possibility of having sgt. stevenson
mand ask him for the identity (Stevenson indicate
his extreme unwillingness to do this. LTC Graham stated that this
request would have to be examined at policy level
within DoD).
If the Committee is able to determine a specific name,
the staffers indicated that they would probably initiate a specific
inquiry to NSA to again search our materials.
UGENE I YEATE
Chief
Legislative Affairs
Encl:
a/s
CC :
DDO
---
## Page 20
• Doc iD: 6606966
CHIDEF
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755
Serial: D1/LAO-017M-78
21 November 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY AND DEPUTY
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
ATTN:
Ms. Judith A. Miller
1. The National Security Agency has made a thorough search of all
records that might contain information pertaining to the Select Committee
on Assassinations' request for information.
to relevant to an allegation by
* linking an assassi-
nation plot against President Kennedy with a figure in organized crime.
i suggest you use the attached
draft as your response.
If, however,
there is any reason why the attached
draft cannot be used, please consult with us before releasing the infor-
mation in any other form.
3-
The attached draft response is unclassified.
EUGENE F. YEATES
Chief
Legislative Affairs
Encl:
a/s
•=1
TIMESTO
CHEAT DENIESACHESS INSANESSA LEGRO
React $95e 605, 10 11052, Collins &
Dustan lin asiaten by the Originate
---
## Page 21
see deeded totted
Doc ID: 660696
Serial:
1190-04711-78
CC: • DIR
D/DIR
ADPL
we 77075
GC
EXEC, DDO
M/R: On 8 November, Mr. Robert G. Blakey, Chief Counsel and Staff Director
for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, posed a number of questions to
NSA regarding at allegation that he te
information linking an assassination plot against President Kennedy with a figure
in organized crime.
MI.. Blakey subsequently submitted a written request (dated
15 November) to support his verbal one.
In essense, the questions probed sa's ability quickly an thereignly
probe for records
hm for information relating to the allegation.
The actual traffic from this period was minimal and no other records are extant.
The Director has approved.
LAO,
---
## Page 22
Do B: 60666
legislati
ive Aifairs
28 November 1978
TO: Judy Miller
1... Enclosed is a request made directly to us by
Blakey and a reply which we propose be provided to
Mr. Blakey by Mr. Kester.
2. If you have any
questions concerning this
please give me a
call:
EUGENE F.
"YEATES'
Encl:
a/s
---
## Page 23
Dọc IĐ: 6606966
DRAFT
AMSECRET
HI. G. Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
Select Committee on Assassinations
U.S. House of Representatives
3331 House Office Building, Annex 2
Washington, DC 20515
Dear MI. Blakey:
This responds to your letter of November 13, 1978, directed to a
component of the Department of Defense.
with respect to the subject of the FBI file to which the requested
information relates;
Dinar sirens
420TOE DOn
MA PN DA
Sincerely,
JOHN G. KESTER
Special Assistant to
The
Secretary
GRAF
---
## Page 24
Doc ID: 6606966
Putts
ONEIDENTIAL CINE-CHANNELS
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
28 November 1978
SUBJECT: Visit to House Select Committee on Assassinations
• On 21 November I visited House Select Committee on Assassinations
spaces to review for classification purposes the report Messrs Cornwell
and Klein wrote following the 17 November interview with Sgt Nicholas B.
Stevenson, USAF.
The report, about one and a half pages long, listed the participants
in the interview and described generally the substance of the discussions:
Although it did not mention the specific site to which Sgt Stevenson and
assigned, it did say that the facility was able t
u. The report further
mentioned f
and "NSA" in several places.
3 ..
I told Mr. Cornwell that as written, portions of the report should
be classified "CONFIDENTIAL, HANDLE VIA COMINT CHANNELS ONLY."
He agreed
to classify it and asked me to mark it which I did. I suggested that with
a few changes we could make it unclassified. Mr. Cornwell stated that he
would prefer to retain the original language of the report at this time
but that if it was to be used in any unclassified report by the Committee,
he would then ask us to review the wording so that classified information
would not be disclosed.
Mr. Cornwell asked if NSA had determined whether the conversation
we ferenced had been published and disseminated in product
channels. I told him that we had not yet determined the answer to that
question and that we would be back in touch.
Legislative Affairsi
DISTRIBUYION
DIR CAS
D/DIR
ADPL
DDO
Exec/DDO.
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10193-10062.pdf | 104-10193-10062 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 12/1/60 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | JMASH | DIRECTOR | CABLE RE: PLS ADVISE IF FURTHER SMITH AMCHIRP-1 | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-28 : F3B : 1998.04.07.20:09:24:390115 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10193-10062
DROLLER
WH/W/ PA
Cil: 1935
DAlE: 1 DECIBER 1960
10 i MASH
FROM. DIRECTOR
0.3
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE
SECRBT
fOUlING
3
INFO. •
File
MPP
DEFERRED
I DECED 22 07 7
ROUTINE
PRIORITY
OPERATIONAL
RARMSOIATE
CITE DU
INO
parall
TINI LAL!
GUT98159
14318
TO
PRIORITY MASH
JIN ET
REP: MASH 1930 (DE 19510)
PIS ADVISE IN FURTHER SMITH ANCHIRF-1 MJ0S SCENDULED OR HOW MATTER HAS
LEFT.
END OF MESSAGE
WH COMET: Hamel Ray/Aschirpal atz 29 Morember
OFFICERS
! o.
DROLLER, C/IRL/PA
AUTHINTICATINO OFFICEA
SCRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMIBITED..
Copy Mo
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-10320-10235.pdf | 124-10320-10235 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 8/10/64 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 100-409763-121 | HQ | RO | 9 | FBI | HQ | 3/12/18 | INC LHM, RS | null | ## Page 1
124-10320-10235
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
4/10/201
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER :
124-10320-10235
RECORD SERIES :
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
HQ
100-409763-121
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM:
RO
TO: HQ
TITLE :
DATE: 08/10/1964
'PAGES:
9
SUBJECTS:
MARK LANE
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Secret
RESTRICTIONS: 1B
CURRENT STATUS: Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 09/24/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF CIA
COMMENTS: INC LHM, RS
19.1
NH 50953 DocId: 32311918
Page 1
31
---
## Page 2
Office Memor ndum
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.
TO
SUBJECT:
Director, FBI (SC 100-409763)
Legat,
Rome
(100-1072) (RUC)
MARK LANE
SM - C
CONF
DENTIAL
DATE:
'SECRET
8/10/64
CIA HAS NO OBJBOTIC 75
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR,
RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION
AN THIS DOCUMEN
Kp218198
7Y 5668 s0l
CLASSIT D
DECI
ReRomelet dated 7/21/64.
By report dated 8/4/64 CIA
this office a report concerning the subjeet italy clAmoseed
emanated from an official Italian service but which was re-.
letterhead memorandum.
even tents o the par in set out a the dental manner
Ore set out in the enclosed
Cumentel
the report was classified Confidential by CIA Yea
4. 76434.
- 014/93 с
GAT
Classiffed
(И)
Declassify on:
DADO JESSY
Becal Tennay,
era,
hafinite
FILI
ENCI
rile
FBI discernsantin cAM
do common, Confrontat
Harpication a tened
Classified by
Exemptfrem iDS
Date of Deciscon
5)
- Bureau (Encs.
SNCLOSURE
(1 - Foreign
Liaison)
(2 - New York 100117844)
1 - Rome
(100-1072)
scM: hes
PROX
AUG 2'7 1964
CONFDENTIAL
LECIZLEA
to NtO 8/17/6.4.
2 6 AUG 311964
18/1/64.
ail
Eroyed 865
COPY
RET
EX 110
APPROP"
AND TYS!
ADVER R
SITD(S)
DATE
14 AUG 74-1964
ATE MENCIES
OFFICES
ECRE
Sovie seatin
SECRET
NH 50953 DocId: 32311918 Page 2
---
## Page 3
8/10/64
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR.
RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION
SECREE
Director, FBI (SC 100-409763)
Legat, Rome
(100-1072) (RUC)
ALL IPOMaTION CONTAIRED
MARK LANE
FERSIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT
SM - C
LEUNG SZON OTEERWISE:
IN THIS DOCUMENT.A
JBH
ReRomelet dated 7/21/64.
By report dated 8/4/61 ClAy Rome, Italy furnished
this office a report concerning the subject which CIA noted
emanated from an otticial Italian sorvice but which was ro
ceived by CIA, Rome,
manner. (S)
letterhead memorandum.
The contents be the report are set out la the dEclosod
The report was classified, Confidentias by CIA
10 re
labskied
Declassity on:
OADR
SAT
ORK
CLASSIFIED BY 5668 SLOGOL
DECLASSIFY ON: 25X U
— Bureau (Ence.
8)
(1 - Foreign Liaison)
(2 - New Yorks 100-117844)
1 - Rone (100-1072)
JCM: hes
(6)
8/18-ClT
8/20-CalT- Gui,
There f clarane
nat persing
sona doss.
WICH! 1N01N.00
SEG
DIA
NELS
NH 50953 DocId: 32311918 Page 3
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10075-10167.pdf | 104-10075-10167 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 11/23/1963 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | JMWAVE | JMWAVE CABLE RE IAPA CONFERENCE ACTIVITIES. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK17 : F3 : 1995.07.11.16:02:18:940028 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10075-10167
SECRET
: 218-138
C
ACTION: C4/0 4
DOPS/L, DODS 4, CA 2, CA/PEG, CA/PROP, CI/OPS, Ci/IC 2, El, Fi/LUT 2, WHi?,
SEGRET
2222322
PACY INFO DIR MEXI CITE WAVE S047
DISORIC IPPANSACK PERUMEN
REPS: A.
PACY 1354(11 65904) :
C/
I'S COMET:
MAPPRECIATE KNOWING
WHAT HAVE ASSETS ATTENDING SEMINAR.
06
VAVE 7900 (IN GSIGN)
DELAYED BY TAPA CONPINNCE ACHINGLES, DEPARTED
BY AIR CO NOVO DIAZ VERDON DEPARTIO 13 LOVO BOTH HAVE FULL
EXPENSES PAID BY FIOPP.
06
2. SUGGEST HANDLING OPS CONTACTS THROUGH
WHO HAS
POA AND IS FULLY RESFONSIVE WAVE. L'SE "FRIEND OF FICARDO IN MIAMI"
AS SONA FIDES. DiAZ VERSON IS PROFESSICAL ANT: - CONUNIS: AND
ONE TIME POLICE CHIEF. UNDER BATISTA ENO
IN TOUCH CITY WAVE THROUGH
06
CUTOUT, EUT WILL COOPERATE WITHI
..:
MI7 URIGITALLY PRESS SECTION DEN, GAVE-SUBSIOILED TEACHERS
GROUP, BUD GRADUALLY BECAME WAVE OUTLET FOR ACCROSS-BOARD PROP
-PLACEMENT.
FIOPP OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT AT APR 6E NESTING OF VALUE
FOR PASTICE PURPOSE. PIS ATTENPT AVOIO DISCUSSION THIS MATTER
AT SSMINAR: FYI AIP OPENLY ANTI-COMMUNIST BUT OTHERWISE
SCRUPULOUSLY ATTEYPTS AVOID POLITICS.
5.
NO INDEXING.
10969
SEERS:
5215a5
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10059-10121.pdf | 104-10059-10121 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 1/10/78 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DDO/ISS/IP/EIS | CHIEF, NE/ISRAEL | MEMO RE MITCHELL LIVINGSTON WERBELL III. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK8 : F9 : 20031208-1021128 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10059-10121
SECRET/SENSITIVE
10 January 1978
MEMORANDUM FOR: DDO/ISS/IR/RIS
FROM
.......-..
Chief, NE larsel
•. a..-..
SUBJECT: Mitchell livingston WerBell TIT
REFERENCE
OLC. 77- 5685/4, Request from House
Select Committee on Assassinations
On 9 January 1978, the files of NE/Israel
Branch were searched for records referring to the
In individuals cited In reference zequest... All
traces were negative, with, the exception.of
Mitchell Livingston WerBell IU
2.
Attached for your information. are copies
of two NE/ISR index cards and two NE/ISR records
concerning WerBell.
The State Department cable
dated 12 November 1971) could not
be found in NBASR files. A copy. of the second
reference, a sensitive Fil report dated 29 January 1970
(Project SCOPE), is attached for, your information.
Please contact the Bureau for rolease of this report.
Also attached 1s a copy 01.a l Decomber 120 article
fron the Washington Post which concerns HerBell.
If further Information.
contact Alyson ward 81004. N6/SSR.
•regen
Attachments:
A.
Index cards
B. Records
SECRET/SENSITIVE
EZ TMPDBT
CL BY 018559
03968
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10048-10098.pdf | 104-10048-10098 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 2/2/65 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | ALLEGED ABORTIVE AIR RAID OVER CUBA BY THE MOVIMIENTO INSURRECCIONAL DE RECUPERACION REVOLUCIONARIA MIRR | 3 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK2 : F15 : 1993.06.30.09:31:56:960510 : | 3 | ## Page 1
104-10048-10098
INFIX::
L NO
CLASSIFY
TO FILE NO
FROM MANENO
FILE RID
RET. TO BRANCH O
ACTIONY
5I3. JW
SEAGRE.T
= Cy
Helen
INFO:
DDP,
'ADI
*, SOD 4, CA 2, CA/PEG, CA/PROP, CA/O 4, CI, CI/OPS, CI/PS,
CI/IC 2, FI, FI/D, FIFINT 6, RI/AN, WH 8, JH/SA/12, VR, FILE.
INDEXED AND CONTROL COPIES
NOT WATCHED NR
SUE:CRET 0323147
H2P
4 FEB 65 11DZ IN 73172
DIR INFO LANT PACY BARR CITE WAVE T9QD SINGHURST ACTING FRAG
INTEL TYPIC
I DISCRET
SUPDATA:
ABSTRACT
_INDEX
ABOUT MIDNIGHT
3
AMCLATTER 1 BY) PHONE FROM
Y 2 FEB. RID: INDEX. FILED: 03/2314Z
REPORT CLASS CONFIDENTIAL CONTROLLED DISSEM
COUNTRY: CUBA
SUBJ: ALLEGED ABORTIVE AIR. RAID OVER CUBA BY THE MIRR
DOI: 2 FEB 65
PADA:
UNITED STATES, MIAMI (3 FEB 65)
MICROFILMED
EEB 121965
UFG 6636
DOC. MICRO. SER
P
SOURCE: A MIAMI BUSINESSMAN WHO WAS A RESIDENT OF HABANA FOR
SEVERAL YEARS.
THE SOURCE HAS CONTACTS WHO RECOGNIZE HIM AS A
CHANNEL TO U.S. INTELLIGENCE. THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A
FRIEND OF BILL JOHNSON
IW COMMENT:
R
WH/SA
122
2R29
8
TDCSD9-315/00379-65
C
P
Y
R
C
P
R
C
P
X/ ROUTINE
BASED ON:
RELEASING I WO
GLENN W. NELSON
DATE
DISTRIBUTED:
3 FEBRUARY 1965
0323Z
SECRET
LIAISON:
EXCLUDED
AUTOMATIC
00487 796868942809
MAMA 104184
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN IS SING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED,
¡PRIORITY
P
UFG-6636
NP: AMCLATTER-1
201-25/684
45icl16165
Copy No.
$39141
7. 0 02236
---
## Page 2
13-00000
CONFIDENTIAL
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE ACENCY
Intelligence Information Cable
COUNTRY
DATE OF
INFO.
CUBA
2 FEBRUARY 1965
ONTROLLED DISSEM
• ROUTINE
TDCSDB-315/00379-65
DISTR.3 FEBRUARY 1965
- SUBJECT -
INFORE
ALLEGED ABORTIVE AIR RAID OVER CUBA BY THE
MOV IMIENTO INSURRECCIONAL DE RECUPERACION
REVOLUCIONARIA& (MIRR
UNITED STATES, MIAMI: (3 FEBRUARY 1965)
PLACE &
DATE ACQ.
SOURCE
AND
APPRAISAL:
REF
IN 73172
FIELD REPORT NO. UFG-6636
A MIAMI BUSINESSMAN WHO WAS A RESIDENT OF. HABANA FOR SEVERAL YEARS.
THE: SOURCE HAS CONTACTS WHO RECOGNISE HIM AS A CHANNEL TO U.S.
INTELLIGENCE. THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A FRIEND OF
BILL JOHNSON®
Cir USA Miami, FialisA.
- 1. ON 2 FEB 65, BILK
JOHNSON, AN AMERICAN PILOT WHQ ARRANGES
SUPPORT ASPECTS OF AIR STRIKES AGAINST CUBA BY ORLANDO BOSCH AVILA'S
cit Cuba
MOVIMIENTO INSURRECCIONAL DE RECUPERACION REVOLUCIONARIA (MIRR,
* INSURRECTIONAL MOVEMENT FOR REVOLUTIONARY RECOVERY) , SAID THAT JACK BROOKS
GUAIGHT WAS ON FRE FIRST LEG ANAUST EVER CUBA WHEN HIS
TWIN-ENGINE BEECHCRAFT CRASHED WHILE HE WAS ATTEMPTING TO LAND AT
FREEPORT, GRAND BAHAMAS ISLAND, ON 2 FEB. JOHNSON SAID THAT A
BOAT WITH AMMUNITION AND SUPPLIES WAS WAITING FOR THE PLANE TO ARRIVE
AT FREEPORT. THIS CARGO WAS THEN TO BE TRANSFEPRED TO THE BEECH
CRAFT. JOHNSON ADDED THAT HE WAS ASKING BOSCH FOR $2, DEÓ TO GIVE TO
This masterial contains Information alectiaz the Intlonal Defense of the United States withla the neaning of the Esplonage Inws. Title
18, U.S.C. Beca. 793 and 79%, the transmalision a revelation Of Which in any manny 10 sit unal buried person is prohibited by law.
CONFIDENTIAL
•LONTROLLED DISSEM
STATE/INR: DIA
ARHY/ACSI NAVY AIR. JCS
SECDEF
NSA
NIC
AID
USIA OCI ONE
OCR ORR
00
:C/CL 2, CIA/NMCC, FBI, IENS; TREASURY, BORDER PATROL, COASE GUARD, CUSTOMS
---
## Page 3
13-00000
CONFIDENTIAL
( TDCSDB-315/00379- PAGE 2
-65
MRS. WRIGHT TO "KEEP HER QUIET."
.2. JOHNSON ALSO SAID THAT WRIGHT HAD FLOWN THE SAME BEECHCRAFT
OVER CUBA ON 17 JAN WHEN THE MIRR BOMBED THE NIAGARA SUGAR MILL
IN PINAR DEL RIO PROVINCE. (FIELD COMMENT: ANOTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY
REPORTED THAT WRIGHT DEPARTED AT 12:30 P.M. ON 16 JAN IN A BEECHCRAFT
BEARING REGISTRATION N 52933 FROM FORT LAUDERDALE FOR FREEPORT.
HE LEFT FREEPORT AT 5:17 P.M. AND CHECKED THROUGH FORT LAUDERDALE
CUSTOMS AT 6:20 P.M. THAT DAY.
THERE IS NO INFORMATION TO INDICATE
THAT THE N 52933, THE SAME AIRCRAFT THAT CRASHED ON 2 FEB, WAS
FLOWN ON 17 JAN.)
3. (FIELD COMMENT: THE 3 FEB ISSUE OF THE MIAMI HERALD REPORTED
THAT THE FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY IDENTIFIED THE DEAD PILOT WHO CRASHED
AT FREEPORT AIRPORT ON THE AFTERNOON OF 2 FEB AS JACK BROOKS
WRIGHT OF 6208 NE 5TH AVE, MIAMI. WRIGHT TOOK OFF FROM FORT
LAUDERDALE - HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AT 11:48 A.M. IN THE
TWIN-ENGINE BEECHCRAFT, WHICH WAS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN RENTED TO A
UNIFORM SUPPLY FIRM. THE FAA SAID THAT WRIGHT WAS LISTED AS THE OWNER
OF THE PLANE.)
4. FIELD DISSEM: CINCLANT, CINGSO, COMKWESTFOR, MIAMI REPS
MOF STATE, USCG, BORDER PATROL, I&NS,
FBI AND CUSTOMS.
CONFIDENTIAL
(END OF MESSAGE)
CHITROLLED DISSEM
D082236
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10431-10075.pdf | 104-10431-10075 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 12/11/63 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | RUSS HOLMES WORK FILE | CHIEF, SINO-SOVIET BLOC AREA | SRI-HUNTLEY NEIL | MF: ADDITIONAL NOTES AND COMMENTS ON THE OSWALD CASE-SUMMARY OF REASONS FOR NOT CONCLUDING SOVIET INVOLVEMENT WITH OSWALD | 8 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK-RH18 : F05 : 1998.12.16.09:38:03:076128 : PAGE 7 IS BLANK | 8 | ## Page 1
104-10431-10075
V
SAM
NO TONSON DISEM
35901
FEE:
ni;-
"Il Deceaber 195t6
Pira
150, 020)
SPITHLES
B2:8: 7.70964
1ASTA5
11148.9
(CEL :2. 13.3.60
CABLE KEN (11)
NED (3).
LECH FELTE
CLASSIFICATION REVIEW
CONDUCTED ON R5- MAY 1921
mIMPDET CL BY 0142€
for FOLA Review on
MAY 1976
HENORANDUM FOR: Chief, Bino-Soviet Bloc Area
TEROUGH
: Chief, Soviet Internal Affairs Branch
Chief, Soviet Division
FROM
SRI - Neil Hintley
SUBJECT
Additional Notes and Conments on the
Oswald Case - Summany cr Rousers
for not ceveluding Stret eNvelremont
with OscArn
According to the New York Iimes for 10 December,
the Fil report on the assassination of Fresident Kennedy
categorically states that loe tarvey Oswald was the
assassin,
that he acted alone, and that there is no ev
dence to
indicate that he was the agent of any foreign
government.
These disclosures prosumably elisinate the
possibility of furtber conirontations, with kre Robert
Slusser•
In the event that tr. Slusser continues to
Inalst that the President was nurdered by the Sovlet se
cret police, the following additional negative indications
and observations may be of sone value.
Long standing kis practice generally forbids
serving outside the USSR to have any contact with
domestic communist parties or with sovlet embassies or
consulates.
2055
This prohibition, designed to reduce the
possibilitles of compronise to a minimm, is probably nost
stringently applied to agents on extremely sensitive i
sions.
Jet Oswald blazed a trail to the Soviets which was
a mile wide.
He corresponded with the nationnl headquarters
of the Cornist Party USA- apparently With sone regular-
Ity-and visited the Soviet Consulate In Mexico City. In
addition to his well-knom leftist political activitles,
11 DEC63
RFCORD COPY
SEGRET
BACKGRO
S USE ONLY
201-289248
endor 1
Excluded ian autoratic
donateling ant
dechoosit caren
tired
---
## Page 2
13-00000
4" "
ho also subscribed to the Dally Vorker and a Trotskyite
pubilcation, allegedly received newspapers fron the Sov
let Unlon, and asked last June that his passport be
re validated for travel to the USSR.
Certain facets of Oswald's activities in the
Boss also sigue strongly thit the IGB sould never have
recrulted him for a mission of any kind. First, there
Is no doubt that Oswald us debriefed by the secret
police shortly after his arrival In Hoscow. They were
interested In him not only because he was a political
defector, but also because be boasted publicly in the
Embassy on 31 October 1959- that he Intended to tell
the Soviets "everything he knew" about Marine Corps
radar Installations on the West Coast. / According to
Oswald's former conmanding officer, this included the
locations of all radar unts and their secret call signs,
authentication codes and radio frequencies-all of which
knowledge was grist for the Sovlet Intelligence u1ll.
Given the KGB penchant for keeping Its "Illegals" under
the deepest possible cover, bovever, 1t 18 extremely
unlikely that oswald with bis Fassian wife was even
seriously considered for subsequent repatriation to the
United States as # KGB asset.
As a re-defector from
the USSR he would immediatoly be suspect and thus under
survelllance by the ible
Furthernore, any Indication
that he had made good on his bonst about the radars
could easily lead to arrest and Indictent on a charge
o1 treason.
Secondly, Sovlet "executive action" agents
(assassins, saboteurs and terrorists) are carefully
selected by the KGB and specifically trained for their
missions.
Oswald very probably ruled hluself out of
any consideration. for this kind of operation. On
14 November 1959,
Moscow refused his request for sor
fet citizenship; Shortly thereafter, he becane des
pondent and reportedly attempted to kill hinsolf by
slashing his wrists.
Even 1f the EG3 bad not earlier
noted signs of mental aberratlons, the sulcide try pre
sumably furnished convincing evidence that Oswald vas
5. Oswald's activities on a Dallas rifle rango on
17 November are of some interest both as circumstantial
evidence of prior planning to assassinate the President
and as one more negatlve indication of XGB Involvement.
BACKGNON.
NO Fo.
USE ONLY
---
## Page 3
13-00000
SLutci
NO FOREC. SSEM
Oswald was firing at a range of 100 yards. He was assigned
to target suber 8, but according to witnesses, was actu
aLy Iring at targets 7, 8, and 9.: Se was thus firing
through an nre of approximately lo degrees and obviously
seems to have been simulating Iise at a moving target.
It 15, of course, most unllkely that & KGb agent on an
pat kins is a ge
perait hinself) to practice firing under such obvious and
public circunstances.
:Go.: The evidence presently avallable to us seens
falrly conclusively to rule out any soviet Involvement in
the President's assassination. There are, however,
several rather fascinating inconsistencies, loose ende
and unanswered questions about Oswald.
Some, #I not ally
may be treated in the IBI report.
Pending its publion
ton, they are listed below for whatever they may be worth.
2): In an interview last august, Oswald stated
that his father-In-law was a sovlet army colonel who
taught him to drink vodsa when he came to court Marad.
After the assassination, however, Nrs. Ruth Paine (some-
time Oswald Irlend and landlady) stated thnt Marina's
father, a colonel, had died wben Marina was an Infant.
b) To the tine of some $437, the US pleked
up the tab for Ossald's return to this
country.
loan was repald between October 1962 and January 1963.
During this period, Oswald was earning $50 per veel,
Thus, over half of
his total earnings went to the govern
ment and he supported himself, his wife and child on
somewhat less than $25 weekly.
His rent at that tine
was $59 per month.
The possibility that he received out
side help In repaying the government apparently hasnnot
been raised in the press.
surprisingly literate.
a par play tog
In contrat to the letters Oswald wrote
to his mother, Governor Connally and Senator Tower, bis
letters to the Falr Play for Cuba Committee are rather
They do not appear to contaln
his frequent misspellings and ungramatical languago.
There have been no suggestions that he received help in
framing the letters, and he told the IPCC that he was
Iinancing his activitles on its behalf out of his ow
pocket.
BAGS 2000 11: ONLY
---
## Page 4
13-00000
SHOREI
BACKGROWNO GOE ONL.
NO FOLDEN OSSEA
There is increasing evidence that Cswald
and his wiie vere not happily narried. She vas vell
liked and he was unpopular.
She soned genuinely lond
of tho United States, did not share his anti-merican
viers and sosetimes spoke of the hard lile in the Sov
let Usion.
Oswald resented ber friends and beat her
up on at last one occasion. Since he could not have
planned the assassination of the President prior to
26 September-whon tbe Dallas trip vas announced could
it be that his appliention for a passport (without one
for Marina) on 29 Juno, his application for & lexican
visa on 17 September and his trlp to Mexico City on
26 Beptember simply indicate that be planned to desert
his wife and soek refuge in the sertet Unlon?
Despite Mrs. Palne's testimony that
Oswald could not drive, witnesses sald he drove klusell
to the Dallas riflo range on one of his vialts.. Do vas
driven there by a unidentified nan on his other trip.
One witness also clalas that two non wore lavolved in the
aftemptcyidently by Oswald-to shoot General Walker
last April.
Distribution:
Orig. # 1 - Addressee
— CD/SOV
CB/SRIv
SRI File
SEE 2A
BAC: 10
ONLY
---
## Page 5
13-00000
PHILE
22St Li
Hesit
COGE SQ. CE. 3. 41
BIEST FEST. COGE
AFE (B)
FOR FROKE
MEMO FOR THE RECORD:
CorRections to Record
SUBJECT: DCI Testimony before the Warren Commission
1. 0/SR called me in re matter of correcting record of DCi's
testimony before the Warren Commission. On page 6582 of transcript,
Mr. Allen DULLES asked one of the key questions in the inquiry.
Unfortunately, the question was badly phrased and contained an
accurate statement.
It was usggested that the following modification
be made for the final record:
Melief that mirk
ME CD
D: Does your answer, Mr. McCONE, include a negation
of any belief that OSWALD was working for or on behalf
of the Soviet intelligence services (originally phrased:
on behalf of the Soveet Union) at any time?.
This would require a slight change in Mr. MCCONE's testimony in
which the words "intelligence services" would be substituted for
HUnion!
1eluded
2. :
In response to C/SR's request: I provided him with à brief
statement to
the effect that other
defectors to the USSR had received
subsidies or salary supplements vis the MVD.
The Statement also in-
cluded information concerning the role of the MVD in 1959 - 61.
(Copy attached)
Note:
/s/:
Lee H. Wigren
C/SR/CI /R
was advised by telephone that C/SR
R used this on
18 May 1964.
/s/
Document Number
628-305
for FOIA Review on
JUN 1976
RECORD COPY
18 MAY64
201-289248
---
## Page 6
13-00000
According to his own statements, Lee Harvey OSWALD
received a lump
sum of 5000 old rubles and a monthly salary
supplemented by 700 old rubles. These funds were provided
to him through the Soviet Red Cross, but OSWALD indicated his
belief that these funds actually came from the Ministry of
Internal Affairs (MVD).
2. Several other Americans are known to have received
salary supplements while resident in the USSR. In two cases
the Soviet Red Cross reportedly supported the defector and his
family for as
as six months. prior
to resettlement.
other cases it was not specified where the aid came
other than Soviet Government or Soviet authorities.
included payment of espenses until resettlement, medcial care,
above-average salary for job done, and lump-sum payments in
varying amounts.
3.
Until January 1960, the All-Union Ministry of Internal
Affairs (MVD) of the USSR was responsible for civil police func-
tions (crime detection, traffic controls,
administration
of internal document controls, fire fighting and civil defense.
In January 1960, the All-Union MVD was abolished and its func-
tions were transferred to the MVD's of the fifteen républics:
of the USSR..
The republic MVDs were renamed Ministeries for
Maintenance of Public Order (MOOP) in mid 1962•
Prepared for and delivered to
C/SR on 18 May 1964 (AM) •
Notified by phone that
C/SR used this on 18 May.
/s/ L..W.
---
## Page 7
13-00000
Sea Sanitines 1al0
Chamber
FOr SterIa sORI SE 3949 E09WPEL
---
## Page 8
13-00000
SR/CI Memo
23 Novumber 1963
vacate
ananation Departrest
241: 91
cover for their friarser there som sort of eyes business Vios Adulnal
COPY oF 34-538
Document Number
for FOlA Review on WAY: 1973
34-538
CoPs
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32304913.pdf | 124-10287-10043 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 07/19/1965 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 105-86025-3RD NR 40 | DIRECTOR, FBI | SAC, MM | 7 | FBI | HQ | 02/28/2018 | INC LHM | 7 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
10/7/201
AGENCY :
RECORD NUMBER :
RECORD SERIES :
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
FBI
124-10287-10043
HQ
105-86025-3RD NR 40
Document Information
ORIGINATOR :
FROM:
TO:
TITLE :
FBI
SAC, MM
DIRECTOR, FBI
DATE : 07/19/1965
PAGES :
7
SUBJECTS :
LCA, ANTI-COMMUNIST, MILIAN, DANIEL, ASSOC, PLOT,
ASSA, CASTRO, FIDEL
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS : 4
CURRENT STATUS :
Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW :
07/01/1998
OPENING CRITERIA : INDEFINITE
COMMENTS : INC LHM
v9.1
DocId: 32304913
Page
---
## Page 2
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
5010-107-02
MAY 1962 EDITION
SA GEN. REG. NO. 27
UNITED STATES
/ERNMENT
Memorandum
TO
DIRECTOR, FBI (209-584)
SECRET
DATE:
JUL 1 g 1965
FROM
SAC, MIAMI (105-10278) (P)
10-23-94
KP&MACSAC
Classified by
SUBJECT:
PLOT TO ASSASSINATE PREMIER
FIDEL CASTRO DURING OCTOBER
Declassity off:
HOLIDAYS, 1965
IS - CUBA
DECLASSIFIED BY 5668 SIR JKSR
3-2-98
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN IS UN
ASSIRED EXCERI
WHERE SHOU/S l
OTHERWiSE.
At
ReBuairtel to Miami 7/8/65
Enclosed herewith are 12 copies of a letterhead
memorandum dated and captioned as above •
Copies are being disseminated locally to the
following agencies: -INS, CIA, Coordinator of Cuban
Affairs - State Department,
Border Patrol, Customs
Miami, Region II, Miami, and Key West, Coast Guard,
G-2, ONI and OSI:
MM T-1 1S CARLOS ZARRAGA MARTINEZ, Key Source -
Cuban.
MM T-2 is MM 635-S.
CIA HAS NO OGJECTION TO
DECLASCITADGN AND/OR,
MM T-3/16 MM 639-5.
RELEASE OF CIA FORMATION
(u)
MM T-4 1s MM 492-S.
IN THIS DOCUMENT. MKH 2-6-98
MM T-5 is MM 974-S.
On July 5, 1965, U. S. Customs, Miami, advised
that they had no information concerning the Sentinels of
Liberty or that LUIS CONTE AGUERO was involved in any
assassination plot.
ENCLOSURE
2) - Bureau (Enc-12) (RM)
2 - Chicago (105-20239) (Enc-2) (RM)
1 - Miami
RJD: 511
(5)
105-86325-
NOT NECORDED
174 AUG & 1965
AUG 6196
SECHET
U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan:
$2,
DocId:32304913
Page 2
---
## Page 3
MM 105-10278
THER SECRET
Copies of the letterhead memoranda prepared by the
Chicago Office in this matter will be disseminated locally
to federal agencies in Miami.
MV 635-S said he will try to re-establish contact
with CONTE AGUERO and will try to furnish coverage of his
activities.
MM
The Miami Office will maintain contact with
635-S
and other established sources and informants
and will keep the Bureau advised.
- LEAD -
MIAMI
AT MIAMI, FLORIDA
Will contact CIA,
Miami,
to ascertain if that
agency has an operational
interest in CONtE AGUERO or
Sentinels of Liberty. (5)U)
It is noted that according to MM-685-s it has been
reported
also that CONTE's anti-communist speeches and
radio activity have been for a long time indirectly sponsored
by a U.S. government agency.
SECRET
2
585-10123
DocId: 32304913
Page
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32292353-1.pdf | 124-10209-10129 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 02/13/1962 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 92-3182-445 | DIRECTOR, FBI | COOK, ROBERT A. | 25 | FBI | HQ | 3/6/18 | RPT, TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES 1a, 1b | 25 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
6/12/201
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER :
124-10209-10129
RECORD SERIES: HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
92-3182-445
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM: COOK, ROBERT A.
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI
TITLE :
DATE: 02/13/1962
PAGES:
25
SUBJECTS :
GAL, RES, TRA, ASSOC, GAMBLING, B/F INT, TESUR, MISUR
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION :
Unclassified
• RESTRICTIONS: 4
CURRENT STATUS :
Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW:
04/28/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE
COMMENTS :
RPT, TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES 1a, 1b
v9.1
390
---
## Page 2
CG 92-373
INFORMANTS
CG T-I is CG 6343-C*.
CG T-2 is CG 6443-C, who was contacted by SAs
WILLIAM A. MEINCKE and JOSEPH G. SHEA from
December 8, 1961,
through February 7, 1962.
CG T-6 is PCI FRANK LA CROIX, contacted by SA
ROBERT A. COOK from December 8, 1961, through February 7,
1962.
CG T-9 is CG 6343-C*.
CG T-18 is CG 6272-C, who was contacted by SA WILLIAM
F. ROEMER on December 8, 196%.
CG T-25 is CG 6486-C*.
CG T-27 is a mail cover on the mailing address of
GUS ALEX at 9353 South Spaulding, Evergreen Park, Illinois.
CG T-29 is CG 6502-C*.
on December 8, 19615 OG 8498-PC, contacted by SA ROMER
CG T-31 is CHARLES POSTL, Owner of Postl's Heälth
Club, who was contacted by SA COOK on February 7, 1962,
(upon request).
CG T-32 is CG 6502-C*.
CG T-33
is CG 6232-C, contacted by SA MEINCKE on
December 12, 1961.
CG T-34 is PCI JOSEPH T. O'HARA, JR.,
contacted
by SA VINCENT L. INSERRA on December 8, 1961.
COVER PAGE
Sealersa
---
## Page 3
CG 92-373
trouble PEARIMAN would bring his problems to KOLITZ and
KOLITZ in turn would see GUS ALEX or one of his associates
in order to get the matter straightened out. He stated that®
KOLITZ was also formerly connected with the
• Blatz Distributing
Company in Chicago and is believed to have secured this
employment because he knew GUS ALEX.
- STEVE' DE KOSTA
CG T-2
advised that STEVE DE KOSTA is a very close
friend of ALEX.
He said that DE KOSTA has taken over in the
management of My Lady Fair, a new key club on the Near North
Side of Chicago.
It is to
be noted that DE KOSTA was
reportedly the former owner of the Hucksters Club and
Old Chicago Room, which are both now out of business.
CG T-2
stated that ALEX used to frequent the Hucksters Club
but seldom visited the Old Chicago Room because it was located
in the Parkway Hotel, which is a hangout for burglars and
prostitutes and always had too much "heat" around for ALEX. *ll
CG I-was under the impression that AlEX and hair suSk were
the actual owner of the Old Chicago Room and that DE KOSTA
was just
a front for them.
HENRY SUSK
CG T-29 advised that HENRY SUSK, owner of Henry
Susk Pontiac, Chicago, is a very close friend of GUS ALEX.
He stated that he received information that SUSK was in the
company of ALEX during the latter part of January, 1962. It
is to be noted that SUSK in the past has admitted lending
ALEX automobiles to use whenever he requested one.
NICK CONTOS
Mr. NIKOLAOS NIKITAKIS Aliens Directorate,
on December 12, 1961, advised
continues to reside at 29 K Kota Street, Ney Psychico, Athens.
KONTOS is not known
n to have engaged in any contacts
or activities which would be the subject of any police action.
It is to be noted that CG T-27 has advised that ALEX has
received mail in the past from NICK CONTOS residing in
Athens, Greece.
-4 -
+097-3152-445
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10179-10134.pdf | 104-10179-10134 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 06/19/1963 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | PARIS | RAY CONTACTED BY JERVAY 17 AND 18 JUNE. | 3 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-15 : F10 : 20040303-1053811 : | 3 | ## Page 1
104-10179-10134
IT+ X 221-239218
SECREL
ROUTING
TO ''DIRECTOR TE
• FROM ":
PARIS
ACTION:
SAS Ô (SAS NOTIFICO AND COPY SLOTTER AT 1735 19 JN DD)
RETERN TO CIA
INFO :
DOP, 68, CL/OPS, CI/OA, FI, RI/AN, ME A NAS 7, S/C. 2
Mad i ee cart Merica
Background Use Only
MAISHED.*
IN63271
SEC
RET!
77272
APRITY DIR INFO PRITY MAOR SJAN VAVE ROUTINE BRUS CITE PARI 9868
RET A PARI 0808 (IN (01964)
1:9 JUN 1963
B PARE 9849 NOT SENT SUAN BRUS LIN (03094)
1• RAY CONTACTED BY JERVAY & UNDER IDEN A ALIASS 1T
AND 18
CON SETAI
JUNE IN ADDITION CONTACTS REPORTED PARA ONE PARI 8824
APAY NAS
ALSO BEEN IN CONTACT UNRUMBLE 6. UNPAPIST, AND AT LEAST ONE COM
TACT WITH AMSPORT SO RAY DESIGNATEO UNRUMBLE 6 AS HIS CONTACT
MAN PARI® JERVAY NOT INTRODUCED BUT WILL CONTACT SHORTLY STA
FEELS THIS IS 8000 MOVE SINCE CUNTUMBLE 6 APPEARS BE
GOOD MAN AND
HAS APPROACHED DNA IN PAST SEPARATELY FROM UNRUMBLE 2 WITH SOME
• INTERESTING PLANS. STA DID "NOT APPROASH HIN DIRECTLY IN PAST
BEAUSE DID NOT MANT TO DISTURA RELATIONSHIE VITH RUMSLE 2.
CORATOLE 2 VILL NEVERTHELS DE VICTING USUMBLE & CURRENT
PELATIONGNZDO NOT VAS DRIVEN AIM SY ALENO DIE
UNGE RAY SPENT MUCH TISE UND UHO BLENS DE CLOSEST TO MAN ANONG
DIe CONTACTE PARISS
on cor parts over utens,
CONTINUE MONITOR DEVELOPN HES
ICPRODUGTONEY OTHER.
AHRA
THE
FICE 19 P
SOMOTES
NATION.
д/р)
---
## Page 2
1d-0d0d
OLASSIFIED MESSAGE
SECRET
IN
63₴
- rAGE 2.
ARJU RAY SELTEVES CABRERA WILL VORX ON ARCOS BUT SAYS MAN WHO
•COULD REALLY DO THE JOB IS ARCOS UNCLE NHO IN PUERTO RICO AND
KNOWN TO RAY ME COULD NOT REMEMBER NAME OR EXACT RELATIONSHIP.
dUI PLANS CONTACT MIM ON RETUMN AND GROOM MIM FOR TASK. RAY ASKED
BE INFORMED WHEN ARCOS RETURNS BRUS.
A KUBARY STAFFER CIDEN 8) OF CONGRESS OF CULTURAL FREEDOM
BET RAY AT LEAST TWICE. EXCELLENT RAFPORT. ME ARKANGED RAY'S
PRESS INTERVIEN VITH GUILLO CO AULINS (INCORRECTLY REPORTED
IN PARA FIVE PARI 89478
SE LE MONDE. ALSO ARRANGED DINNER S
JUNE. WAS NONCOMMITAL BUT ENCOURAGING ABOUT JOB POSSIBILITY FOR
FRANQUI, SHOULD HE DEFECT.
SO RAY SEEMS TO BE CONFIDENT FRANQUI WILL JOIN HIS CAMP IN
NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE AND RELYING ON CABRERA TO CONTINUE WORK
B ON SEANS PARO SO GOT SEE SO LANS PROCEED A ONE LINES
DIR A8158 AND PARI 9067J NOT SENT SUAN BRUS).
POSSIBLE REFERENCE
TO GUEDE TALK VITH FRANQUI IS IN& JUNE
Сивок.
MARIO SPRESUMABLY
THIRO SECY MARIO GRACIA VARELA CALLED FROM THE EXHIBITION SAYING
"THAT SOME ANTI-CASTRO ELEMENTS WERE ABOUT AND THAT FRANQUE ASKED
FOR SOME MORE PEOPLE FRON THE EVASS
L4 TO BE AROUND THE EAHIEITION
ALSO 12 VEINE UNSIERRA (ORS
Aru: is (com
ENTS TO UNSNATU. 16 THAT
*SOME "GUSANUS" VERE AT THE PHOTOBRAPIZE EXHIBITION AND THE FRENCH
COLICE VENT: BY CUBAN ENS TO ASK IF THEY SHOULD GUARD THE EKHIBIT.
NOVEVER HIS LATTER PROUNDLY NOT REFERENCE TO SUEDES DERER THAN
DILS STA MES NO INDICATION TRANQUI MIS TALKED ARONT ARERONE
TO BEN
BAY TEELS TOUP EURORE WAS VERY PROITABLE DEPTE PReT
HE HAS NO FIRE COMMETIHENT EBOX FRANQUIS CABRERA OR ARCOS NE
a Sara
---
## Page 3
RUSSIFICO MESSAGE
SECRFT
IN 63371 PAGE 3
• BIG,SECHS CONFIDENT THEY VILL JOIN MIM EVENTUALLY. NE FEELS HE NAS
TISHTEVED UP AND INSPIRED HIS "ORGANIZATION" PARIS. SAYS HAS
GAINED AMPRESSION FROM TALKS VITH CUBANS HERE THAT DISILLUSION-
MENT AYONG CUBAN EMBASSIES AND OFFICIALS INSIDE CUBA HAS GROWN
CONSIDERABLY. RAY CONVINCED IT POSSIBLE TO OVERTHROW CASTRO
CLEANLY AND SIMPLY WANTS DEVOTE OUN APPARATUS TO IDENTIFYING
DISAFFECTED ELEMENTS IN CUBA AND BUILDING UP SUPPLY APPARATUS IN
•AND OUTSIDE CUBA TO SERVE THEY
Bo RAY ASKED FOR FOLL
A• UP TO DATE LIST OF PERSONNEL AND ADDRESS OF ALL CUBAN
EMBASSIES IN EUROPF, TO BE PASSED HIM IN SUAN AND UNRUMBLE & IN
PARIS. HE WANTS BEGIN MAILING PROPAGANDA AND LETTERS TO STIMU®
LATE FURTHER DISAFFECTION •ERSONNEL®
& TRAINING OF HIMSELF IN SUAN AND UNRUMBLE & PARI IN
IDENTICAL SU SYSTEM WHICH THEY CAN USE FOR CORRESPONDENCE BETVEEN
SJAN AND PARI AND ALSO INTO CUBA. STA FELT BOTH THESE IDEAS
SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED AND RAY WAS TOLD COULD BE DONE. WOULD
APPRECIATE HOS PROVISIAN OF ITEM Á AND DESIGNATION OT SU SYSTEM.
CO RAY ALSO ASHED WE LINE UP JOB FOR CABRERA AS EUROPE REP
SUME PAPER AS DISCUSSED VITH MAUMAN PER PARI B94T, VOULÉ APPRI-
CRATE MAS FOLLOWUP ON THIS
• FILL ONE SOLTO ACOONPLISIENT OY NAME TRIP WAS RELE
TONINENT-OF VORKENS MELATION DED RNS BELIEVE HE MET IT ONE
APPORT WHICH MAT ALLENTATE B04S
SUNT DOHE PAST PROBERNS NUBA
RELAFIONSHIP
IC.. INDER
C/S CONCERTO DRAY DEPARTINO PART NE O1S ARIVINO NY 1300 MOUS 10 20
SECRET
C SECRET
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10216-10151.pdf | 104-10216-10151 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 1/6/64 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | MEXICO CITY | CABLE: REF DOES NOT INCLUDE TELEPHONE NUMBER. PLS CABLE | 2 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-51 : F2 : 20040315-1057868 : | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10216-10151
= 25-2522741
Вана по еще то -
3 0 321234
I88: 09 105 165a
ClASSIED ESSAGE
PILE ID
DES HOT L
500
12.2
SECRET
• DIRECTOR
M Fatta
; MEXICO CITY
AClichie WH 8
(TEMPO FOR WAI SLOTTED AT: 1900 6 MAN. G ON)
'1R6t: • DOP, C1/04, SE 4, SAS 8, VR
•E CRET 062333?.
PRIORITY DIR CITE
NEXI 7650) (EASBY ACTING)
PERIMEN DEGRIP
REF& MMMW 12233
REF DOES NOT INCLUDE TELEPHONE NUMBER OF ERNESTINA.
ROUTING
PLS CABLE
JAS: 7147
ROUTING INITIAl
RID/AN
IAD/AIS
R
• P
REVI
WH3/MEX
DESTROY
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMIBITED
so. 229.
108g 1 389
RI COPY :
RI COPY
135.
---
## Page 2
14-00000
003
DATE : 6 JANUARY 195%
: DIRECTOR
"ROM : MEXICO CITY
ACTION:
SAS 8
NFO : MH 7. VR
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE
34/25
SECRET
1
2
DE"
INFO
Satus
JAN. 79
19302 64
ACTION CHANGE
ROUT INE
IN 93118 A MEXI 7650
CITE
PERUMEN DEGRIP
C/S COMMENT:
ACTION RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS CABLE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM WH TO
SAS BY R. SCOTT WH DIV, EXT. 5940 IN COORDINATION WITH N. SANCHEZ SAS DIV. EXT, 7147.
EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC DON~
SECRET
GRADING AND DECLABSIFICATION
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
Copy No.
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10291-10019.pdf | 104-10291-10019 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 01/01/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | GEORGE MARTIN ROSNEK. | 67 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-58 : F17 : 1998.04.17.12:33:21:640082 : NOT BELIEVED RELATED | 67 | ## Page 1
104-10291-10019
SECRET - SECURITY INFORMARON
CONTRACT PERSENREL
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
RETURN FILE TO SE 45
NOTICE:
This is
an Độc fue of Personnel File
and
subject to 1o
day
limitat ion 'period.
This
has beun charged
file
and is due do he returned to
CONTRACT
DIVISION, 5E-65 Hgs.,
×784 COU 2008/25
---
## Page 2
admi
Dear Mr l
Reference is made to your contrnct with the U. S. Goternmont
as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 1970,
as amendede
Effective & April 1979, paragTaph four (4) entitlod "Compensation"
to an nded by doleting the figure 837,270 as it appears therely and
substituting la lou thereos the figure 341, 270.
Said paragrap
so don"
i 10 aloo modilled to provido that rubsequent
sumentation of your baute foe, based upon the peroentage increase.
authorised U.%, Goverent ciploycon la tho anmuel Rectolative Per
Increason, vis be individually authorized by contract amendrient ate
proprtato tined as requested and cents fled by the responsible
ament officiel, provided homever, that your total comendson
under thia perppraph doen net exceed, the setary rot.
63-650
äll other terms and Conditions of + 1e
convenet, an amendid, isman in fuel fare and
effect.%
---
## Page 3
14-00000
ACHINISTRATIVE - INIEMiAL USE CNLY
Dear
Coctive 7 october 192 peregregh four (0) artier tea by-non: *
montod by deletino the facure 801270 03. 12 appeas.
etatuting an laou thereor the Pagure 300, 15%
Alt other, Losed art condations of the contrect.
cut forco land offecto
UNTICO STATES COVER
ACMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
1115178
---
## Page 4
14-00000
sis a.
597-58
SECRET
1579.190171
5 998
C1 321-79
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Chief, Contract Personnel Division
- TRONG
1d. H. Blee:
Chie
e Counterintelligence Staff
THROUGHS
Career Management. Staff
lanpower and Support Branch/Contráct
-SUBJ
idment:
to Contract for
QuE 1) entitled "Conpensations
ofs subice ti
re ective sir
Naren. 1970
Fe is cherch regu
sandi che:
514
hoe the run 270 be delete
as amender
subs attired, thereins
crease represents the percentage ingrease:
(z percent)
authorized US Government employees on the annual Legislative
ray increase etrective
October 1979
2 All classified Secret
David H. Blee
CONCUR:
got 79
Chief, Contract Personnel Division
Da-te
CL BY
063765
RVW: 5
Oct 99 DRV D9c. 1
SECRET
---
## Page 5
•ADMINT:
DIVE - INTERLIN USE ONLY
Dear
reference is made to your contract with the ünited States Government.
as 9a sented Er the Centräl Intelligence Reeney, effective 1 March 1970,
fective & Baril 1979, paragraph four: (1) entitled "Carpensation"
ts sended by caleting there gues
637,270 as fit appears therein and by
subser sting an a eu thered agre
guzest 70.
Sata paragraph: ts alsor
not ento premise.
that subes.
NO BICE
Increase auth
enmente
hostes
contraet ene
gustaveren
requested
Kbr the responsible: Gavechnem
onensat ton. under this paragrap
does not exceed the equivatent rot the satary robe pata at the top step ot
GS 25352
in othes ters and conditions of the contract, is mended; renain tri
full force and effect.
CEVIRAL ININLIGENCE AGENCY
13/
ocritracting Officer
*11 AR. 1919
Đã tẻ
11.1 APR 1979
Đặt c
David I. Ble
12
APR 1979
Date
ADVINISTRITIVE - INTERAAL, USE OVIS
---
## Page 6
14-00000
SECRET
29 MAR
CI 121-79
SGEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division
FROM
David H. Blee:
Chtef,
Counterintelligence Staff
THROUGH
chief
carpose career upport tie Sa/Contract
Career Management
SUBJECT
Amendent to Contract for
•Action: Keque
ede us reques go chas the contract
ans Independent contractoi
his compensation from 537,270 to 341270
per annum offective 8 Ap711 1979,
Rackground. In Septembor 1978]
This $20,000 clain has become
an-vosession wish
and is likely to affect negatively
his relationship wey one agency unless rosolved to his relative.
satisfaction.
Attached for backeround information are
documents relating to Mr.
clại.
in this casc it
Mol casey consideratise of ty cutties torolved
dictate. that ve settle
clatm In the following
manner:
I will approve an increase
in hts. annual parment by
54, 000 effective April 1979 (from $37,270 to $41,270)-
his annual
compensation would be Increased each
such time
CE BY
063765
RVIV ' 26
Mar
99
DRV D9c.I
SECRET
---
## Page 7
SECRET
reaches the salary pald an employce in the
stop of GS-15 (currently $47,500) his annual
compensation
would be increased only as the pay for that step increases..
amended, remain in
All other terms and conditions of sald contract. as
full force and effect.
5.
All classified Secret
David: R. Bloe:
Attachme
As
3 + 3
CONGURA
Chief, Career Management Staff
O3 APR ST
- Da te.
APPROVED:
Chief, Contract Personnel Division
Date:
2
S
ECRET
Her a ne
---
## Page 8
SECRET
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM
Chief, counterintelligence Staff
SUBJECT
REFERENCES
PODONOR
•A.
Memo Dated lo Februsry
1970
From DC/Security
Rescarch Start
Acknowledgment end Rolease Form
Dated 12:
July 1973
A careful review of the PRONOR 110 substantiates
the ract chae chore were circe unequivocal fianctal comms t=
ments made to PiONoR at the time ot his defection in
February 1904. These: three commitments nere.
ile would
bê paid $2S,000 for each
of
. the
two
years he cooperated in place.
Total
$50,000.
•b..
He would receive $t0,000 for has part in
jdentifying William Vassale a British
Admiralty employce as a NoB agent.
C i
He mild récaive $25,000 per year salary,
the Agency
2 o
The question at issud how is whether an additional
comnitment was also made to. PDDONOR. to the effect that thé:
Agency would provide Emanciat assistance
to him to purchase
a home:
According to PDUONOR,
to his dee on ace or aton eith dis case officer.
Mr •
he stated,
"i will arfre with
what I have.
on:
my back
no home. no roof no anything."
the reply to
PDDONOR™
-be
WaS.
as follows:
"This will be taken care of.
'It will
provided
This exchange in PDDONOR's view, constituted
COOL ERV
14 Fob-90
DRY 09c. 1
_BY.
063765
S E
CRET
---
## Page 9
SECRET
what he
believes
a coumitment on the part
of the Agency
to provide. him with
financial
in the purchase. of
A memorandum dated
16 Fobruary 1970 written by
Mr:
Bruce Solle describes this verbal exchange between PDONOR
and his case officer.
(See Reference A).
In addition,
memorondum dated: 14 August 1972 also written by Mi. SoMe
(Reference D) states that "Nosenko stated that prior to his
he discussed his future-with Bagley and
made three requests,
being;
Employment at $25,000 per year;
b: $50.000 In savings accounts
Assistance in purchasing house.
According to Nosanko,
Nosenko
that his coucts
considers. this constituted a valid, verbal contracte
From PiNONOR's viexpoint therefore an additional
commitment,
quito separate and apart from the three listod
in
paragraph 1 was made to him.
Consequently, she now argues
that a paynent made to him in July 1970, in the anount of
$20, 000
and which he used as a downpayment on a housc, was
the
fulfilinent of this additional commitment and not part
the $50,000 he was promised. for his two years
as Mr.
Solie statos in paragraph S
"Nosenko also
considers that the assistance in purchasing furniture
nouses etc, which he has been given since 1969 should be
considered as cancelling the matter of the 350,000.
4.
What seems to have occurred is a change of position-
on PUDONOR's part.
while previously
acknowledging that the
original 350,000 commitment had been
below listed payments only: $30,000 should be applied against
the $50,000 commatment.
The July 1970 payment of $20,000.
should be applica against a separate commitment to provide
purchasing
a home.
2-
SECRET
---
## Page 10
SECRET
$2,000 in March 1964
$8,000 1n. May 1969
55,000 on. July 1970-
$20,000 on 1 July
1970
(According to PDDONOR this
payment Should not be applied
against the $50,000 commitnent)
$15,000 on 12 July 1973
Thuse
to pDONORs reasonins
$20,000 is still due him
as part of the original $50.000 commitment.
Several additionat pornts: should be noteds. on. 2 July
1973 PDDONOR signed an "Acknowledgment rand Releasey:
prepared
by the cencrat Counsel in which, PDONoRereleases and. forever
discharges. she US. Government and the Agency from. any Claim for
moncy prowlsed
to him:
(Reference C)
addis ton the issue,
of
the 20, 000 he
says is suri owed him does not surface:
Min:
the file unti
Sentember 19790
14ycars after his defection.
The explanation of why this resue would arise at this tate
date is not cicar from available: records.
Attached are copies of those documents which impact.
on this issue.
Because of the complexities
of this case I
recommend that we reguest.the Office of General Counsel to
$20,000
After such a ruling we can
discuss our
future course of action.
7.
Ail classified Secret
• в гротчуіа
Attachments:
AS
Stated
SECRET
---
## Page 11
* SECRET A
OGC 79-02042
1 March 1979
MEMORANDUN FOR
FROM
SUBJECT
Chief; Counterintelligence Staff
John
Rizzo
Assiatant General Counsel
Financial Commitments to PDDONOR/1
Thio: 13 in response to yous memorandum ot
webruary wich sequeste europinton concerning.CrAxe
obligations to PrONAR/laxtormer higher
" KGB.:
retected to ths countrysen february
196 zaftes: having:
coopens sed. place for the prey lous two
Years Based on, information contained in CT. Stoff tilee.
there appears ne quest ton. chat the Agency made thice docu
mented,
detections
negul vecat promises to PopoNOR/l at the time of his
he would be paid a total of $50,000
• 15250000
per anñum) in consideration for his previous:
tho years' service in placer
b)
he would receive a $10,000 payment for
his
part in identifying a certain KGB operative
in the British government; and
c)
he would be placed under contract for an
indefinite period"
yearLy
provision for retfrement
and other benefits.
Your menorandum
seeks our assistance In resotving the issue
of whether of not the
Agency hat, as PoDoNOR/d
asserts,
any
current, independent obligation to pay PDDONOR/1 S20,000
based on an oral commitment made to him by, à now retired CIA
officer at the time of hts defection promising
him the
Agency's Financial assistance In his securing a restdence
in this country:
ORIGINAL CLBY _ 03577:9
O DECLE REVICH 28 ECh 99
EXT BYND 6 YRS BY
3ame
REASON.
3d (3)
ALL PORTIONS ARE CLASSIFIED SECRET
ATTACHMENT
---
## Page 12
I SECRET
2.
As you know, due to unforseen and extraordinary
factors which arose shortly after PDDONOR's defection.
three documented comnitments made to him as outlined
the
in the
previous paragraph. were
not fulfilled until some years after
his defection. In this connection, the file indigates that
PEONORA did
not start
receiving an Ageney salary unttl
March: 1969, and that it was not
until six years later that
he began to be paid. at the previously promised rate of
$25,000 per arnum. Accordingly, in order to belateaty
satisty in full the commitments originary made to DONORy
In 1964, Jump-sum payments have been made to him on three
occasions in recent years with the approval of senior Agency
managenent Bered yo
these lump-sum payments consisted of:
Sy1900 tess taxes)
in November 1922.to coverscho
balance owed fordealery auring the pertod Aps 196 Ato
March 1969b: 315,000 in July 1973 to setole the remainder
in place overseas prion to his defectiong and c) $28:500-
(authorized in April 1976 but evidently notepala until late
cast year) to cover the balance of his previously promised
as well as the $10.000 commitment originally made to PDDONOR/1
prior to his February 1964 defection (see paragraph t(b)
above) for his role in identifying a certain kGB operative
in England.
As previously
tion
stated, the sole issue for considera-
at this point revolves around PDDONOR/l's rclatively!
recent assertion that CIA still owes him $20,000 as a result
of a vaguely worded oral comnitment made to him by a now-
retired
Agency officer in 1964 who promised that CIA would
provide housing
for IDDoNor/i in this country following, his
arrival. In analyzing eDdONOR/l's contentions In this
regard, we believe for the
following reasons that the details
surrounding CIA's July 1973 payment to him of $15, 000 assume
particular stonificance and do; in
fact,
firmly rule out
any.
further, outsfanding legal obligation to him with respect to
payments to cover PODONÖR/1's éventual purchase of a höme.
Of course, the key consideration involved is the fact that
the s15,000 payment was made following PDDONOR/ll execution
of a
quitclaim prepared by this office through which he
agreed to
"celease, and forever discharge.. the: Central;
Intelligence Agency: from any
claim
for money promised to
him for, and/or at. the time of his defection, and from any
and all other clates in any form whatsoever arising out of
or in any way connected with his cooperation
with... CIA prior to the date of this document, 12 July
1973.*
SECHET P
---
## Page 13
14-00000
¿ SECRETA
Thus, the wording of the quitclaim is clearly and purpose
fully unconditional and is
specifically intended to bar the
kind of belatedly raised Claim which
PoDONoR/lis raking now.
4.
In taking this position, we recognize that one
out in rebuttal that
notwithstanding
the scemingly all encompassing scope of the guitclot,
further payment of $28,500 wag
in fact subseguently author
1zed
fOr PDDONOR 1 In April 1976.
However
an internal OGC memorandum dated I April 1976 which concurred
to this additional $20/500 payment, the real purpose of the
12 July release was to settle once. and for all the losue of
the balance. of the $50.000 owed PRONOR fOE Wis two years
of in place cooperation pelor to his detectione Recordy Yo
paynerases intended to satists other pre-
existing comitments to pronore. base are owes
fox. 1964-1969 as.
weitas the 50,000 promised tor ma role
this offlee
Condicate that an operate paymentands vegan parassed-
ble since to was outside, the Intended scope of
the guitclaim
and was being used to tuttift separate.
fully documented
promises of compensation made earlier to him.
1973
5.
BY contrast;
at the
time that CIA made Ats July
payment
to PDDONOR/1 In return;
for his quitclaim, the
avallable background materials contained in the files you
have provided us loave little doubt that the issue of compen
sation to cover his purchase of
a home was an Intrinsic part
of the calculations which led to the
decision to
3ИEл0г120:
the $15,000 payment to him at that time.
For Instance?
in
the 25 June 1973 menorandum
to Me. Colby which contained the
[commendation for the s15,a00 payment, the director ot
Security delineated some of the previous advances made to
PoDoNoR/1 in partial Batisfaction of the s50,000 owed to hin
tor the
1962-64 period.
It was specifically noted in that
connection. that
"Tadgainst thus 1S50,000l Sum in April-May
for resettlement An e private aconomy and. es. coo
(PDDONOR/1l was given s8, 000 as financial assistance
a new house and othes related-
expenses s
These mounts Plus
an addattonal
$2,000 which had bech prevtously
advanced were sustracted
from the original $50,000 commitment, thus lcading to the
final figure of
$5, 000 that was.
subsequently paid
in July 1973 and
for which he readily
signed
the quitclatt re
leasing CIA from any further financial
obligationa
to him.:
Director of Security's memörändum went on tó indicate
The
that
PDDONOR/1 agreed*
with these calculations: morecter PDDONOR/1's
acknowledgment that CIA had previously fulfilled its
SEGREES
3
---
## Page 14
A SECRET S
commitments to him regarding a house is more explicitly
documented in a 14 August 1972 memorandum for the ffle from
the Deputy Chief, Security Research Group, which quotes
PDDONOR/I as saying that he considers that the assistance
matter of the 550,000*• (Emphasis added):
6%
Therefore, from
all. of the above, it must be coy.
crudes that. contrary to PoDoNOR/l's assertions, crAhas
long since fulfilled any promises which Agency representa?
tivos made to him prior to his defection concerning his
housing in this country.
further, the avallable evidence
clearly tends to indicate thet
PoDoNON. fullyurdorstood.
and accepted the fact. that these obligat one hath been
Caly
at
10B%
Since, the couns and scope os the quitclaim ano fully
controlling.on. the claim which PronoRs to asserting we
have determined that the Agency has no, legat, outgat on
whatsoever
tỏ pay tìm the 520,000 which he seekee
As a
final note,
this
olfice rocognites that.
not"
withstanding the absence
of any legal obligations, the par-
Licularly sensitive
status. of eddonor/1 within CIA may
nevertheless give rise
to an understandable desire in some
quarters to make the $20.000 payment to him on security
and/or moral grounds.
We do not necessarily quarrel with
•such a viCW,
nor do we mean to imply that cIA is legally
precluded from, in effect.
"waiving" the terms of the quit
claim if it so chooses.
At the same time, it
must be remen
bered that this office
was
asked to prepare the gurkelaim at:
issue in 1973 precisely in
anticipation.of a situation. such
as the one beföre us now.
it is respectfully submitted that
such documents will cease to have any future efficacy.or
credibility whatsoever if individuals such as PDONOR/I who
are ostchsibly bound by them perceive a willingness on the
aside these carefully worded and legally
binding documents whenever a claim
(no matter how til
founded) is advanced.
short, we hope and trust, that any
based on truly compelling security or moral considerations
Jen a Pass
at SEGRE L
4
---
## Page 15
CHINIS RATIVE - ITS
CREE ONLY
Dear
clarence la made to your contract with the U. B. Germent, a
epresented by the Central Intelligenco Agencil, effective 1 March 1970, a
"It in the courán of this contract you are airected. to traval or
nue to ta care the calcion of the content, as mened, tate te
VE - INTETAL, USE ONLY
---
## Page 16
AMENISE
Dear
Reference lo male do your contract with the unital states soroement.
represented by the cantral. Intelligence Agendy, elfective 1 Marcti 1970,
aman lode
Elective 8 April 197%s parograph tour, (l) entitled, pompensation"
anion deleting the floure sa7,270 as it appete thereln an by
quo tituting In lieu thered the figure eno.
said paragroch to alco
paleted to proude that abegunt musentation of your baste fog, bored
be indiytuy authorized br contraction
estad and certifles by. the reaponatole Gover
official, prostied holes a that your toes? Opansation undor ente paragr
Dog not encood che egulvalent of thi
A Man treat coltion de de enret, el conte, re to
CENTRAL INALITICS AGONY
EX:
KIRKSSI
APPROVED:-
13
ADMINISTRATIVB - INTRUME UBR ONLY
---
## Page 17
14-00000
Atlantil d.
Mr. Bruce A, Bertotally
Dear Mr. Bertotally:
Reference Is made to your contract with the United States Government, as
represented by the Contracting Officer, effective 1 March 1970, as amended.
Effoctive 3 October 1978 paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" 1s
amended by deleting the figure $35,327 as it appears therein and by substituting
In lieu thereof the figure $37,270.
All other tems and conditions of the contract, as amended, remain in
Pull force and effect.
UNITED STATES GOVERIMENT
contracting officer
м вн
в 2005
10/10/28
Admidistrative - literal Use Os.,
---
## Page 18
14-00000
ADMINISTASCENE - IRREMAL USE ONLA
Dearl
Ratorenco le made to your contriot with the Unitel Statur Coverment, as
representad by the Contral Intelligunce Ayancy, offoctivo 1 Marchi 1970, a8
amundad."
Effectivo 9 October L0T7 paragraph four (1) entitio) "Ompensation" Is
emmlal be deleting the figura $33,000 an 1t agoars theral and by substituting
In leu theraof the figure $33,327. Sall paragraph Is also molitled to provide
that mibrewent augentation of your busic fee, lanes uoon cost of-living
Insreases, will be Individually athorizel by contract anenment at appropriate
time's as roguested and cortified by the responsible Covermant offIcial•…
Nil other ters and conditlons of the contract, as amanded, remain
in full force and eftact.
Bi i tri
COVIRAL INTO LIGENCE AGENCI
13eu 1771
Spactal Contracti
78.
VITYRESI
Da
APPORT
?.-"
---
## Page 19
Diar L
saference la mile to your contract with the ünited Stäter Owernment, as
represented by the Central Iritelligence Agency, effective l March 1970, as
amin leil.
Eatective 16 mbruary 1977 parzarash four (4) entitled "Corpensation"
18 mena by cather laing you a one-time, Jump sin tirable payment in tha
amount of $2,100.
ALl other berms anl conditions of the contract, no amendort, remain
In full force and effect.
RAL, INTELL
• - AGENCY
all Cont
acting Of
2 ger 28
Da ba
15/
2: Cgs 28
APPROVID:
B. 21.
heTh
Date
---
## Page 20
AGMINS/ANTRE INTONEL USE ONLY
Dear
Reference 13 male to your contract ilth the Unftail States Covernment, as
represented by the Central Intelligenca Agency, effective l March 1970, as
Refective 1 June 1977 parugraph. Elva (5) entitlod "allaner, Tearol, ani
other Expenseg" la amended by expanding its sope to authorize the cincurtent..
pluntary, tratel of your dependent wilo, incluling the apperprtate eate o
par diem. when it la datemind by the responsible Government otticial thal
such travel a support and best serve eparationas Interesta am opectives.
The extent and destinations of such depen lent travel will be an destonated and
defined by such offictal and, when in the course of such travel if lo Setarimd
as a mitter of operational necensity of as a matter essentlal to her health me
vell boing that she remin at sine partleilar plice in the course of such travel
unile you continua on to specifie geographical locattons in tulellment of
Government netther Inters or assums eny Mast lily of hat ever nablure
concerning her health and well baing tenans freety electe-to invertake such
travel:
in full orree te is md condithmt of the contract, as ambay, rematin
and effet
DIVRAL INSLLIGACE ADICY:
BY:
special tractim olliont
pate:
WITHESS:
15/
2
2:8
Date
APPROVED:
Date
---
## Page 21
OGC 78- 0606
1-31-15
SECRET
Bertotally, Bruce A.
30 January. 1978
ME GRANDUN: FOR: Chef, Countorintelllgence Staff
VIA:
Offica of General Counsel, OND; Attention: Mr. John Risto
FROM:
SUB LET
REFERENCE:
Chief, Contract Forsonnel Division
Contruct Arendment for
onoranden from Chiot, Cl Staff, dated 20 December 1977
Referenced.
menorandin percained. to, ornal roquest to amend
sub jot contract to proM de author fratan do to cite operato do get
(S) Paragraph Elve (S) of Subject's current contract.
anong other.
things, provided for
It is our opinion that the intent
hore was to provide authorization for expenditures for "Operational" purposes
no language boing goneral. and non-restrictive in saturo, it would follow
that aiy expenditum deemed by you, as the operating activity, to bo of an
operatlonal nature, and so authorized, would be within the framork of the
authortzation and that there would be no need to specifically identify and
addictonally authorize the icon invor its value. Accordingly no netton
Is taken upon your request,
it boing presuned that you already have adequate
contractual authority.
/8;
+ 1481-399918
Concur :
Lai John A. Risso:
* "Offico of Coneral Counsel
Distribution:
Orig & 1 - Addressee
1 - OGC/O6MLD
246 OP/CHD.
Date:
& FEB 1970
3ECRET
E2 IMPUET
CL BY: 063837
---
## Page 22
Dear
Ref. In unde to your contract sith the aû. Garlo, du represented by
the central Intelllience Agenes, effective 1 March 1970, as amendedlo
Erfoctivo 26 Doc, 1973 parnerapi five (5) catiuled "Allowances, Iravel,
and other Expences" In mended by the deletion of the last sentence to 1t0--
entirets and by aubctituting in lleu thereor the following:
- EIr In tho course of thie contract you are directed to travel or are.
authorized to incur other expenses, retabursenent of auch expenses vill
"be made on: à commuted rate bacio, based on constructive cost, nite in the
In the washinston stropolitan area. This commuted rite sun will hot
be inconcent reduced by my operational entertalment that may be
provided to you."
All other tents and condition of the contract, as emended, rematr in fula
force and veffect..
Signature.
+156+01522-094
---
## Page 23
1d-0n0d
SECRET
26:98,
CI 194-78
MEMORANDUM FOR: Contract Persenael Division
FROM
David H. Blee
Chief, Counterintelligence Staff
THROUCH:
Chief, Career Munacement Staff
Manpower and Sapport Branch/Contract
SUBJECT:
Contract. Amendrent for
Bruce A. BERTOTULLY
Astion Requested: It is requested that the contract:
for Bruce A. BERIOTAL an Independent Contractor, be amended
by consing the est sentence, on caragraph so allowances
travels ands other penses, to read as colors:
"Ifph the course of this contract, you are directed
reimbur sement.of
to meason of much cared in one prene
commuted
in the at to me rope can ant the connehile
commuted:
rate sun will
not be, reduced by any operational
entertainment that may be provided to you.
Background:-
Because of the current wording in
paragraph's of BERTOTALLY's contract, C/PCS/CSS/B&F
believes
that a reduction in BERTOTALLY"S
commuted rate
entitlement
must be made when operational entertainment (meals)
provided him
by
his
casc officer.
are..
based on the present wording in
This
interpretation is
the contract stating that
rcimbursement
for expenses will be in
"substantial
accordance
with CIA resulations
Since unter CIA regulations
a re
duction in per dien
is effected when meals are provided by
the Government, C/PCS/CSS/B&F belteves the language of the
contract should be amended to permit operational
entertainment
(meals) torbe provided to Subjock without resultant deduction.
in his commuted rate reimbursement=
3.
All other terms
and conditions of the. contract
remain in full force and effect.
David H. Blee
David H. Blee
CONCUR:
DERIVATIVE CL BY 043142
O DECLE REVW ON Di DiaS
• DERIVEDFROM 9C -1
C/CMS
SECRET
---
## Page 24
-Hey Bruce Me Borestally
Dear Mi. Berto 1215
Ref, to kare to your contrass with the U.s. Gort., as represented
Dy the Central Inalligence Ageroy, effective 1 March 1910, an aended,
rend vity speciese reference to the amendment erfective 1 June 3911
pertaining to travel as authorizos in paragrapa fre (5) entitled Morancose
Trevel and other Bigennes."
Pirective i June 29171 the lest sentence of
-cald parnerati a Foe senso of vadea pertetna to the importtion and the
mubjoctlvets.of.tande.rne
tved inder the contractato tires, lu daleted in
ito entirety
Eitective 2S Jens 1918 data & 1a Further amended by expanding the
scope of pariao four (1) till copensation to provide for then
author, ratlon of a one time to eus payment in the angunt of triot.
All ather tens and confitions of the contract, an anended, remale ti
full force and effect..
---
## Page 25
•L " hilLiAL VoE UNlI
Pr. Drucó A. Bertorally
Dear He: Sertotally:
Roference 1a nada to your controct vith tho Unitod Statea Covoramant.
ad
representod by the Contral Intellieence Acency,
allectiva 1 March 1970,
emundod, elth specifie refarence to the amendeont effective ! June 1977
portaintag to travol ao authoriaed la parasraph five (1) anticlod "Allovancoo,
Travol and other Expensos."
Refoctive 1 June 1977. the last sentence of
sald paragraph, the senno of valch partalas
co the imposition and the subjoctivaty.
of funda recoivod undor cho contraét to cara, la delecad in 1ca entirety.
¿§loctive 25 January 1978 nald contract to furthur amended by expandtos:
cha sou of parasranh four (4), enticlod "Compensocton"' to provsde for ehe
authortiation of a ono-cina, lum mun nymans in the
ount of fi. 400.
Ml other rore ind condieton of the contract, on amendod, remain ta
Pull force
and effeet.
TINTIN
e mớ do ho
BE
spocial Contract tas Officor
- HITERNAL USE ONLY
1-30-78
---
## Page 26
SECRET
20 858
C1 659-77
MEMORANDUM FORE:
FROM;
THROUGH
SUBJECT.
Chief, Contract Personnel Division
Bo
Hugh Tovar
Chief, Counterintelligence Staff
Chief
arce:
Manpover
see Manage Branch/c
Branch/Contraet
Contract Amendment to
Action Requested: Mats requested
that the
contract
for
7. an. Theependent
amended. eftectivo. as of: 1 January, 3978
Contracto'' 550.00 per month for the use of his private
to pay him
living quarters as an office:
"It is atso requested that
contract be amended to include the interest
payments on a car that he purchased
so that he could be
ready and available for work when we request him.
i. Background:
Khen CI Staff assuned responsibility
for
In July 1076, we noted that the Office of
Security had an inforant arrangement by which it reimbursed
1$50. 00 per month for the use of his private
quarters as
office space.
arrangement be incorporated its now requested that this
Icontract.
On? February 1977 former Chief Cl Stuff agreed to
reimburse
for the interest payments on a car
which he purchased so that he would be ready and available
for work when we
needed hin;
The months interest
charge as
of December 197% is slightly less than $39.00
and it is
. EZ IMPDET
CL BY 012209
SECRET
---
## Page 27
SECRET
cxpocted to. decline.stcadily .as tho unputd. balance ls
amortised over tho next to years
therefore,
requested that
I contract be amendou to
also include this payment
All other terms and conditiong of said contract,
as amended, remain in full force and effect
lugh Tovar
CONCUR:
C/CMS/MSB/C*
2 3 DEC 197:7
Dat'c
2
SECRET
---
## Page 28
4-00000
S
ECRET
C1 031-78
MEMORANDUM
FOR:
FROM
THROUGH
:
SUBJECT
Chief, Contract Personnel Division
Hugh Tovar
Chief, Counterintelligence Staff-
Chief, Career Management Staff
Manpower and Support Branch/Contract
contract Anendment,
Bruce A. PENTOTALLY ON
Action Requested: is requested that the contract
for Bruce
BERTOTALLY, an Independent. Contractor..e
amonded retroactive to 1 June 1977 deloting the last sentence
of paragraph 3j
concerning the taxability of operational
travel by his wife, of a previous amendment effective i June
1977.
It is further requested that a one-time, payment of
$1: 404 to BERTOTALLY be authorized to offset the tax he is
required to pay on the $3,100 which represents his wife's
travel expenses on their last operational trip abroad, which
appcared on BERTOTALLY's W-? form for 1977 as additional
taxable income.
for BERTOTALEE On July 1996,
After CI Staff assumed responsibility.
based on requirements develoved
by the field, he was asked if he would be willing to under-
take occasional operational irios abroad
BERTOTALLY agreed, but was
adamant that he would only do so if the Ageney would allow
his wife
to accompany him not only for purposes of companion
ship
but also. to enhance his security;
condition to such overscas operational travel and because i
was felt het presence would contribute
to his good morale,
effectiveness in the porformance of his mission, and also
preclude his possibly
creating potentially embarrassing
incidents for us and
the host fiaison services; Chief,
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 012208
SECRET
---
## Page 29
SECRET
C/ Staff made a personal commitment to BERTOTALLY. that
he could indeed have his wife accompany. him on any
operational trips abroad, if he chose to have her do so,
and that her travel expenses would be borne by the
Agency.
It was
understood that her
travel expenses would be Timited
to the cost of her travel and. per diem.:
subsequent to this agreement Bertotally took three
separate:trips abroad accompanied. by his wife
No proprems
Terrors he
rouchers. submitted
trip, cinning neit ointycosts as operationat.
thoir last joint trip abroad her travch expenses of 3/100
wore
interpreted as additional taxable income. BERTOMDE
considers this a violation of the commitment made to him
and has demanded that the Agency pay hin a sum equivalent to
thc additional Federal and state taxes he will have to pay
as a result of our unilateral decision on this matter.
Presently
he already have three separate trips abroad
planned
for BERTOTALLY during 1978..
We are convinced that
unless we reimburse him for the $1,404 additional tax he
must pay for 1977 and assure him that his wife can accompany
him on future operational trips abroad at Agency expense
and without having
such
expenses. declared
as' additional in-
come,
he will refuse to go on any more trips abroad on our
behalf.
A11 other
terms and conditions of the contract
remain in
full force and effect.
3tugh awar
Hagh Toyal
CONCUR:
C/ CMS/MSB/ C
26 Jan 78
SECRET
---
## Page 30
14-00000
SECRET
Mr. Bruce A. Bortotally
Dear Mr. Bartotally:
Reference is made to vour contract with the United States Governsent, ne
represented by the Contracting Officer, affective 1 March 1970, ae amended.
Effactive 9 October 1977 paragraph four entitled "Couponsation" 18
i led by tole the the rous 2: 09ald a paro the did bosurg
provide that mibsequent austentaiion of your basic fèe, baned upon cont-of-living
Increnses; will be Individually authorised by contract mendrant at appropriace.
¿then no requested and cortilled by the rosponsible Covernment offlesal.
All ócher coris and conditions of the contract, as amended, remalmi
In full force and effect.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMEN
EZIMPDET
CI. by:
063837
ACBINgG
1-13-78
---
## Page 31
SECRET
5 %:
CI. 001-78
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Director of Personnel
ATTENTION:
Chief, Contract Personnel Division
FROM
B.
hiel. counterintelagence. stat
THROUGH
Chief,
Carcer Management Star
Manpower and Support Branch/Contracts
SUBJECT
Contract Amendment for
Action Reuvested: It is requested. that the contract
for
an Independent Contractor,
be
amended retroacurve to. 9. October 1977 to increase his
compensation from $33,000 per annum to $35,327.
This tepre-
sents a.cost of living increaso of 7.05 per cent. (It is
further requested that a clause be included in
contract to
the effect that he is entitled to the equivalent
of any future cost-of-living increases granted to Agency
employees.)
in
2.
Background:
was recruited by the Agency.
switzerland
in I96Z and promised $25,000 per year while
working as an agent in place.
• He later defceted to this
• country:
In July 1976 responsibility for him was transferred
from the Office of Security
to be of great assistance to this Staff as
to the Cl Staff and he continues
well as
the Fbi.
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 012208
SECRET
---
## Page 32
SECRET
The remuneration that he recrives from the Agency is his
He was given cost-of-living
to
receive such increases in the future.
December 1977 he inquired why his pay did not already roflect
7.05 per cent increase given to Agency employees in October.
Ne believe it to be in the best interests of the US Government
to honor all commitments made to him and to assure that he
continues to
identify himself posttivoly with the Agency.
All other terms and condicions
amended, remain
In full
force:
and
of said contract, as
effect.
BALA
Tovar
CONCUR:
C/CMS/MSB/C
9 dar 27
Date.
2
SECRET
---
## Page 33
SECRET
14 November: 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chlef, Contract Personnel Diviston
FROM.
Chief, PCS/CSS/B8F
SUBJECT
RÉFERENCE
Contract Amendment - Bruce A: BERTOTALLY (P)
Our Memorandum of 29 June 1979
Our Memorandum of: 28-
September 1971
In regards to referenced memorandums, we were telephonteally
adutsed by your office that subject's contract was being amended
to provide that the travel expenses of subject's wife represented
taxable compensation:
As we are nearing the end of the tax year,
It would be apprectated if the amendment could be provided in the
near future in order that these payments can be included in sub-
ject's earring's statements.
Thanks.
SECRET
E2 IMPDET CL BY 061922
---
## Page 34
14-00000
SECRET
29 June 1977
MENORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division
FROM
Chiof, PCS/CSS/B6R
SUBJECT
Contract Amendment - Bruce A. BERTOTALLY
No are in receipt of a copy of subject contract
amondment dated
27 June 1977
To administer the conditions
of this améndment, thero are two questions which come to
mind:
a .
The
amendment provides.
that travol of subject's
dependent wife may ho authorized "when
it is
determined by the responsible Governmont official
that such travel will support and best serve
operational interests and objectivòs."
Under the
provisions of lk e0 (18) now in the process of
amendment), TDY truvel, for dependents of an employee
must be approved by a Deputy Director.
Further,
under the OGC ruling 77-1204,
ThY travel for a
dependont "should not be authorized,
save the
Doputy Director's discretion.
It should be changed
to preclude
any possible interpretation of which
would give rise to the junkets for wives and depen
dents at Government expense
While it is recognized
is in fact an Indopendent Contractor,
the entire subject of dependents roY travel is a
delicate issue,
and because of this, we ask that
your office identify the level of the
"responsible
Government official"
who must approve the operational
necessity travel of subject's wife.
SECRET
---
## Page 35
SECRET
b.
Query..
if the TDY travel of subject's
wife
is in
fact properly approved,
not as an
opérational.
necessity, but
for matters "essential to her health"
do these payments in fact become taxablé income:
The
regulations define an Independent Contractor as a
self-employed individual who nay be paid a fee for
certain
services of products, and generally contracts
provide for reimbursement for necessary operational
expenses:
We have no difficulty in certifying the
wite 's
travel when it can be classified as antoperational
necessity
However,
as both references provide authority
only to
dependent operational
this also gives rise as: to what level of
authority is roquired to authorize travel for a-
dependent
wife to accompany hor husband on a TDY. trip was a matter
essential to her health."
It 1s requested that
we be
advised
of the level of the "resonsible. Government
official"
who can approve such travel
Further
ag:
subject's contract draws a line between the opefational
necessity
travel and that travel essential to hor healoh,
we would appreciate boing advised if the non-operational
travel paynents for subject's wife represents taxable in-
come.
PCS/CSS/ BEF,
Distribution:
Oriz.
4. 1 - C/Contract Personnel Division
SECRET
- 2-
---
## Page 36
14-00000
come
SECRET
28 September 1977
MENORANDUM FOR: Chef, Contract Personnel Division
FRON
Chtet, Pes/EsS/B&F
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE
Contract Amendment - Bruce A. BERTOTALLY (S):
Our Memorandum of 29 June 1977
A response to our referenced memorandum (copy
attached) would be appreclated.
28 September 1.977
PCS/ESS/BRF/
Distridution:
Orig•
CPD
B2F
files
SECRET
E2 IMPDET EL BY 061922
---
## Page 37
ні, акад ри 67-8.
T Opt..1977
Ar of thile date a fuid each har been made of GiD for she eabou: - of rubject,
rile.
Our rerords indirate that 1i sar charged out tol
Jin July
probably in
refertare to ruertion ral-et by
on dependent
travel.
He has rearched and hir pery har searched oGe with no marrerr.
Ori 6.0ct
and undersigned met. with
t91+
that in erna to hil
westion re approval authority for travel Suet CI
Ke to covered pnint *
to 'ravel of ou independent son actor. In ronformence
and
indi
Indirated arceptance of the -tuation:
with Govt rule: and Reg.
---
## Page 38
Rr. Bruce A. Bertotally
Dear Ar. Bertotally:
Reference is made to your contract with the lpited States Government, as
represented by the Contracting Officer, effective 1 March 1970..
Effective 1 June 1977 paragraph five (5) entitled "Allerances, Travel and
other Expenses" is amended by expandire Its scope to authorize the concurrent.
voluntary, travel of your dependent wife, Including the appropriate rate of
per diem. when 1t Is determined by the responsible Government official that
such travel will support and best serve operational Interests and oblectlves.
The extent and destinations of such dependent travel will be as restonated and
defined by such official and, when in the course of such travel it is determined
as a matter of operational
necessity or as a matter essential to her health
and well being that she remain at some particular place in the course of such.
travel while you continue on to specifie geographical locations in
fulftllment
of operational missions, continuation of, her pen diem will be authorized for
such perlods.
Al) montes. advanced or reimbursed you hereunder by the Governs
ment and for the purposes herefo Indicated are determined to be additional
income to you and as such considered to be taxable for federal Incone tax
purposes:
It is also understood and agreed by all concerned, and 1s herein so.
the tens of this agreement.
Government neither Inters or assumes any Mability of, whatsoever nature
concerning her health and well boingate she frooly clocts to undertake; such:
Al other terms and conditions of the contract, as amended, remain in
full force and effect:
• UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
10/
BY
Contracting Officer
E2 IMPDET *
CL BY:
063837
2S.00
10/17/77
---
## Page 39
Seene!
17 October 1977
MEHORANDUM FOR: Chief PCS/CSS/B&F
FROM:
SUBJECT
REFERENCE
DC/CPD:
: Contract amended Bruce A. BERTOTALLY
Your memorandum, sublect as above, dated 29 June 1977
Your referenced memorandum catsed two basic questions in regar
to an amendment effected to the contract of Bruce Bertotally.
.To.
determine the answers a meeting was held:6. October 1977 with discuss on
and deciston by those present:
ISSADDA John Rizzo for.
the General. Counsel
and
for CPD:
In subparagraph (a) öf your memorandum you requested identification
of the level of the responstole Government offictal who must approve the
operational necessity travel of subject's wife.. The Chief Cl Stafe was
so Identified.
Subparagraph (b) basically related to the taxability or non taxability
o9, funds made available and relating to the dependent wife's travel.
was the consensus and agreement of all present that all such funds should
be considered as additional compensation and taxable.
E2IMPDET
CL BY:
---
## Page 40
14-00000
SECRET
28 September 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Dirtston
FROM
Chief, PCS/CSS/B&F
SÜBJECT.
REFERENCE
Contract Amendment - Bruce A. BERTOTALLY (S)
Our Memorandum of 29 June 1977
A response
to our referenced memorandum (copy
attached) would be appreciated.
28 September 1977
PCS/CSS/B&FA
SECRET
E2 IMPDET CL BY 061922
---
## Page 41
SECRET
:29 June 1977
NEMORANDUM FOR:
Chivf, Contract Porsonnol Division
FROM
Chief, PCS/CSS/BGF
SUBJECT
Contract Amendment - Bruce A. BERTOTALLY
1. We are in reccipt of a copy of subject contract
amendment dated 27 June 1977 To administer the conditions
of this amendment, there are two questions which come
The, amendment provides.
that travel of subject's
dependent wife may be authorized "when it is
dotermined by the responsible Government official
that such travel will support ánd best serve
operational interests and objectives.". Under the
provisions of HIR 22-2a (18) (now in the process of
amendment), TDY travel for dependents of an employee
must be
Further,
travel for a
depéndent "should not be authorized, save the
Deputy Director's discretion. It should be changed
to preclude any possible interpretation of which
would give rise to TDY junkets for wives and depen-
dents at Governmen't expense."
While it is iccognized
that
subject is in fact an Independent Contractor,
the entire subject of dependents To travel
is a
delicate issue,
and because
your office udentity the leved of the responsib
"responsible:
Government official"! who must
approve the operational
necessity travel of subject's wife.
SECRET
---
## Page 42
1d-0d0d
b.
Query, if the TDY travel of subject's wife
is in
fact properly approved,
not as an operational
necessity, but for matters "essential to her health"
do these payments in fact become taxable income. The
regulations define an Independent Contractor
as. &::
self-employed individual who may be paid a fee for
certain
services
or.products, and generally contracts
provide for reimbursement for necessary operational
expenses
We have no difficulty in certifying
the
wife's travel when it can be Classified as an operational
necessity.
However, as both references provide authority
only to Deputy Directors to approve dependent operational
this also gives rise as to what level of
authority is required to muchorize travel for a dependent
kito to accompany her husband on a TDY. trip "as a matter
" It is requested that we be
the resonsible Government
official"'
who can approve
such
travel. Further; as
subject's contract draws a line between the opérationat
necessity travel and that travol essentral to her health,
ve would appreciato being advised: if the.non-operational
travel payments for subject's wife represents taxable in-
come..
PCS/CSS/B&F
Distribution:
Orig. & 1 - C/Contract Personnel Division
SECRET
2
3. LIMEDET CL Br261922
---
## Page 43
22 more
Ct 575-77
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division
FROM
B•
Hugh Tovar
Chiof, Countorintelligence Staff
SUBJECT
Action Roquested:
It is requested that
paragraph five. (59 crititlod "Allovances, Travel and other
expenses of BrucoA. BERTOTALLy's contrace dated) I March 1970-
as amended, be furthor, amended offective I Jue 1977 to permit
his wife to accompany him on
travel
abroad.
2.
Background:
As in indopendent contractor Bruce
A.
BERTOTALLY'S
concract makos no provision for his wife to
accompany him when traveling abroad at
our request.
. This
amendment will make such travel possible when at the option
and dircction of the Contral Intclligence Agency it is
believed that such travel wlll materially inprové his cover
and security and substantially contribute to the performance
of his mission.
The rcquested change in paragraph five (5)
should in no way
obligato BERTOTALLY's wife to accompany her
husband on travel abroad nor does it assume su). liability if
she frecly clects to mako such travel.
All other torms and conditions"
of the contract remain
in full force and effect.
Sing: Kuan TaiCoy
B.
EZ INPDET
CL. BY 019359
SECRET
---
## Page 44
SECRET
064510
20/12755.93
Mr. Bruce A. Bertotally
Dont Hs, Bertorallys
Referance lo nado to your contract with the Untted States Covernment, da
roprosinted by the Contracting Officer, effectivall March 1970.
Pilactiro 1 June 1977 paragraya five (5) rutitlad "Allovencos,
Traval and other ispensos" in anended by expanding ice acopa to suthorite
the concurrent, voluntary, traval of your depeniont wife, tacluding the
approptinto rate of per dien, then 1t la dateralned by tha responalblo
Covernment officlas that such travel vill nupport and best sorva operational
Intereats and obeetya.
The extend and destination of puch dependent
travel u1ll be a dantenated and defined by nich official md, whea to tha
course of such travel it la deterioed is i mattor of operationil noceanity
or du a nactor nonstal to but bealth and vol botag that aba renola it don
particular placo to the course of such travl vile you contire on to
pictite geosraph,ca, Location in lulfilmut of operation astone;
continuncion of bar per din mit be nichorted for such pertodo.
All other torna and conditions of the contract, so amcaded, rematr to
full force and affect,
UNITED STATES COVERINEN
18/
Contracting Officer
ELLIPDET
Ci: by: 063837
SECRET
---
## Page 45
14-00000
SECRET
Mr. Bruce A: Bertotally
Dear Mr. Bertotallys
Roference is mado to your contract with the United Statos Government,
as reprosented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective l March 1970.
Effective 1 March 1975, said contract is amended by revising the first
sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation"' to read as follows:
"You will be compensated by the Centräl Intelligence Agency
at the rate of twenty-five thousand, two hundred filty dollars
($25, 250) per year."
All other terms and conditions of the contract remain in full force and
effect.
CENTRAL
JNTELLIGENGE AGENCY
Spicial Contracting Olficer
CEPTED:
Bruce
WITNESS:
Bertotally
APPROVED:
LICROFILVED
GULY
ELIMPDET
CL by: 063837
SECRET
---
## Page 46
1d-0d0d
Dear!
Reference is made to your contract with the United States
Jovernment
effective i March 1970.
as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency,
Effective I Narch 1976, said contract is amended by revising
tho first
sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation"
read as follows:
"You will be compensated by the Central Intelligence
Agency at the rate of Twenty-Six Thousand Five Hundred
Thirteen Dollars ($26,513) per yéar."
A1l
other terms and conditions of said contract remain in
full force and iffect..
Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY
BY
Spectal Contractin
OFFICEr
ACCEPTED:
Apr: 6 8, 1976
Date
WITNESS:
Bene Isile
APPROVED:
220l,26
certlled to be a true copy of the sigred original which is on fle in the
office of Security"'
Chief,
Eudget and Fiscal trach
Office of Security
MICROF ILMED
JULY
1977
SECRET
---
## Page 47
AOMNESRATVE
INTERSAL USE CNIY
Nr. Bruce A.. BERTOTALLY
Dear Mr. Bertotally:
Reference is sade to your contrace with the Taiced States Goverment, an
represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 191o, As
amended.
Effective 1 October 1976, said contract 19 amended by revising the ffrst
sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" to read as follows:
"You will be compensated by the Central Intelligence Agency at the rate
of Twenty-Eight Thousand lae Hundred and Three dollars ($29,103.00) per year,"
All other terms and conditions of sald contract, as amended remain in
full force and effect.
Please achowledge by itguins la the space provided belor.
CENTRAL. INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
1209.
spectal Contracing officer
•ACCEPTED:
/s/ Bruce A. BERTOTALLY
dont act Personnol D1718103
Detober: 12. 1976
Date
WITNESS:
Gellu0/976
APPROVED:
MICRCEILWED
JULY 1977
Date.
Certified
to be a true copy of the signed original which is
file in Ct Staff.
BITERNAL BSE ONLY 7
19h6
Personnel Orficer
CI Staff
---
## Page 48
ACMISTRATIKE
INTERNAL ERE ONLY
Мг. Bruce A. BERTOTALLY
Dear Mr. Bertotally:
keference is made to your
contract with the United States Government, as
represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 1970.
Effective 1 December 1976 said contract is amended by deleting the figures
$12.50 and $603.52 as they appear in subparagraph (n) of parngraph 81x (G)
entitled "Negotiated Benefits" and by substituting in lieu thereof the figures
All other terms and conditions of the contract remain in full force and
effect.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Special Contracting Officer.
ACCEPTED:
/sl- Bruce A: BERTOTALLY
WITNESS:
9. Du 14,76
APPROVEP:
Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is
in CI Staff:
12/14/16
Porsonned officer
MICROFILMED
JULY
and a de
1973
AOMHSTMATIVE
TARMEN USE ONLY
Read 12115146.
---
## Page 49
1d-0d0
Bruce A. BLKTOTN.LY
-Dear Mr. BERTOTALLY
Reference is made to your contract with the United States Coverinal. as
reprevented by the Contracting Officer, effcctive l March 1970, as amended.
Effective 16 February 1977 paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensati
1s amended by authorizing you a one-time, lump sun, taxable payment la
the amount of $2,100.
All other terms and conditions of the contract, as amended, female
In full force and effect.
UNITED STATES COVERNHENT
BY
Certified
I to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in
CI Staff.
MICROF ILN ED
•4966
Personned Officer
23 Fibuke, 1777.
• ASMNSTRATSE
BITE 22 ISE ONLY -
---
## Page 50
14-00000
ABENSTRATRE
INTEREAL DOS CUTY
Bruce A. BEKTOTALLY
Deur Mr. BERTOTALLY
Reference is ande to your contract with the United States Government, as
represented by the Central Intolligence Agency, effective 1 Narch 1970, as
amended.
iffective 1 March 197%,
said contract in anended by revising the first
sencence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" to read as follows:
"You.will be compensated by the Central Intelligence Agency at the
of Thirty-three shousand dollars. ($33,000) per year."
A1l other teres and conditions of sald contract, as anended renata in
full force and effect.
Please acknowledge by slining in the space provided below.
Ослабу
Spectal Contracting officer
ACCEPTED:
Way 3,1927.
Date
WETNESS:
1977
APPROVED:
MICROFILMED
Date
Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in
CI Staff.
AOMINICTRATITE Persónnel Officer
INTERNAL USE ONLY
---
## Page 51
Mr: BrUCe A, BERTOTALLY DA!
¡Dear Mr. Bertotally:.
Reference is made lo your contract with the United Statee Government,
as ropiesentrol by flie Gentral Inielligence Agenes, effretive l March 1970.
Effective | March 1973 said contract is amended by revising the
firat sentence of paragraph four (%) entitled "Comprasation" lo read is
•follows:
You will be compensated by the Central Intelligence
Agcncy at the rate of Twenty-Two Thousand Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($22, 250) per year."
All other terms and conditions of said contract remain in full force
and effect.
Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
As Represented by the
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
By:
ouncer
ACCEPTED:
18/ Bruce. 1. DERTOTALLY
WITNESS:
1s/ Bruce I Solie
Date: 142201 16, 8023
Date: 16 March 1973
Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in the Office.
of Security.:
20/345
Chief, Budget and Fiscal Branch
Office of Security
STORET
EZIMPDET
CLby: 026715
---
## Page 52
Мг.
Bruce A. BERTOTALLY
064.010
Dear Mr. BERTOTALLY:
20/71
Reference is made to your contract with the United States Government,
as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, cilectivo l March 1970.
Ellective l March 1974, said contract is amonded by revising the firut
sentence of paragraph four (4) entilled "Compensation" to read as follows:
"You will be compensated by the Central Intelligence Agency
at tho rate of Twenty-Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollara
($23;750) per year. "
All other terms and conditions of said contract remaln in full force and
effect.
Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below..
CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY
M
1/75
ACCEPTED:
/s/ Bruce A. BERTOTALLY
kirip 9, 1974
Date
WITNESS:
99/na11474
Date
APPROVED:
Vị Min)
Date
Certified to
bea true copy of the signed original which. is.op
file in the Office of Security:
ELIMPDET
CL by: 063837
Chief, Budget and Fiscal Branch
Oftice of Security
SEGSET
---
## Page 53
14-00000
RONOUNO COMPONINT
BETONALER. Druce A.
CASA OFFICER
Doden on Security 3K2
Bruce lo Solle
PERSONAL DATA
PRECTIVA DATI
CURRINT RCS POST
Independent Contractor
1.1 March 1969
PUTURI ROS POST (ACTIO DATO)
Washioston, D. C.
AILATIONI#
BRATE CA DIRTH
CITZENIAN
Nº
10392
EA TERMO
7682 F0. 9126
Allen
DATE OF BERTI
RESICA WITH SUANET, I NOT. MITRE
I SPOUSE UNDER CONTRACI CR DIMONO DY MOTACT
APICTIVA DATI DE COVEA
COVER DATA
YA$
I VES, PROVIDI PUDONYM
¡TRONELO BY COM
NONONCIL COVER
РАСРАНТАМУ
TEs.
Divido
CONDA PACITY CATTICATO
ALLONANCE
PAY, PRANOO USO aY Covie
MEE OF TAR:DDO
VENTATION TO IN USURD AY COVER
117. 18: 811
WOFACT DATA.
PAYMINT OR
CONIPINSATiON:
HEADQUARTERS
INGOLD
DEVISED PACAITY
ACCOUNT FICA
WORACT TO MPORT
DEVISED "PACIÜTY
1099
DIVISIO PACHITY
#' SUESET I UNDIR MONOPACIAL COVER CONSUITATION VITH THE COVIAT TAX COMMITILE IS MIONIRIO
A TAX-ASCESCAINI
Not Applicable
IWAL SiOT AS SUONID OY THE COVEAT TAX COMMITTE
COMMENTE
#Prior to preparing Fora, calll
x5345, for addrens
"Incone aud social security taxes will bo vithheld.
O/SEx wiri handle Ililog of stato estimated tax returns.
APPROVAL
DATA
• 313 a usi prinay
toriors
AUTHENNICATICON
DATE
SIGNATURE ALSINSILE DIFICI
6/25/69
Bune Pole
Bruce I. Solte
LE ORRE TO ONICE DI PALANTE, CON TO CENTRA COVIN COPY TO PRE
SECRET
SECRET
NOTE: DETACH:THIS PORTION OF FORM AND DISTRIBUTE SEPARATELY
SOCLAL SECUAITY NO.
HOT SCIANO ACCONTA CONIATO O MONOE NORANDE
5T7-74-5127
ADDAIIS OE RECORD UN UAY
ADORESS (Ferrga)
* Bee above
FOX 313A USE PREVIOUS EOMONS
DISTRIBUITION- SICHED ORE TO OSAICE DE EDMAVÉE, CORY TO CENTRAL COVIA, COAY TO PRE
SECRET
N° 10392
JUSEY SOCIAL LICUITY NO
---
## Page 54
Empl A 064010
Per your request,
the following de. a breakdown of additional retroactive
salary for the perlod 1 March -J1 May 1977. This will be Included with normal
salary check for the month of June.
Cross
1,224.27
Fica
$20.40
Fedtax
401.10
SEx
85.4046
Net
717.33
Gros
2,750.00
New normal salary effective 1-30 June 1977 1s as follow,.
Fica
Tedtax
608.07
_Stx
170.00
Hosp
18.75
*Pien Max reached for tax year; Stopped offective. 1. June 1977
Met
1953.10
MICROFILMED.
---
## Page 55
REPLY-REGRETTED
SPEED LETTER
YES
LETTEN
_day 1925
T0 : Chiof, C&TD/OF
FROM:
OS/B&F
4E71 Hqs
TIN: Special PayrOll Ops
SUBJECT: Bruce A. BERTOTALLY 1064010 - Independent Contractor
Attached is an amendment to Subject's contract increasing
has compensation from $23,750 to
$25.750 per annum effective
1 March 1975,
Withholding. of
_state tax should
be increased from S125 tors130 per month concurrent with
the
offective date of this amondment.
I trust it is not too jate
to include the increase plus adjustment for March with hiss
April
pay:
Your
assistance: is appreciated
as alvays:
SNATURE
REPLY
O416
HETURN TO ORIGINATOR
1838
USE
PRETION%
SEITIONS.
---
## Page 56
Bruce A. BERTOTALLY
Mr. BERTOTALLY (P)
1S!
ruce
JULY 197I
---
## Page 57
SECHET
Mr. Bruce A. BERTOTALLY (P)
Dear Mr. BERTOTALLY:
Reference is made to your contract with the United States Government,
as represented by the Central Intolligence Agency, effective l March 1970.
Effective l March 1971 said contract is amended by revising the
first sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" to read as
follows::
"You will be compensatod by the Central Intelligence
Agency at the rate of Nineteen Thousand Five Huidred Dollars
(19, 500.00) per year."
All other terms and conditions of said contract remain in full force
and effect.
Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DOC MICRO, SER.
As Represented by: the
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
By:
MICROFILMED
Contracting Öfficer
ACCEPTED:
/S/ Bruce A. BER TÖTALLY
WITNESS:
ist Bruce L. Solie.
Date: 12 February 1971
Date: 12 February 1971
Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in the
Office of Security.
ivisti
Chief,
SEGIST
Budget and Fiscal Branch
Orrect security
23546 man manade
CaW796-10% 291
Cátaclesias
---
## Page 58
Me. Bruco A. BERTOTALLY. S021
Dear. Mr. Bertotally:
Reference is made to your contract with the United States Government;
as sopresented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective l March 1970,
as amended.
Effective I March 1972 said contract, as amended, is further amended
as set forth below:
"(a) The first sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "COM-
PENSATION" is revised to read as followa:
"You will be compensatod by the CIA at the rato of
Twenty-one Thousand Dollars ($21, 000) per ycar."
(b) Sub-paragraph (a) of paragraph six (6) entitled
"'NEGOTIATED BENEFITS" is deleted, and in lieu thereof
the following is substituted:
"6(a): You presently have a private health insurance
plan for yourself and your wife. It is understood and agreed
that you will bear a portion of the total premium cost of said
plan; this organization will bear the remainder. Your portion
Is herein established at $12. 50 por month and will be deducted
from contractual paymente due you. The total annual premium
coat of said plan lo presently $603.52. If required, the.
Government's portion may be paid yearly, in advance."
All other terms and conditions of said contract, as amended, remain
in full force and effect.
Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
As Represented by the
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
By:
Contracting Officer
ACCEPTED:
/S/ Bruce A. BERTOTALLY "
Date:
Fe Barn 201, 192$
WITNESS:
/S/ Bruce. L. Solic
Date: Fcbruary 29, 1972
Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in the Office
of Security.
DOC. MICRO. SER.
an miner
MICROFILMED
Chiel, Budgek and Fiscal Branch
Office of Security
---
## Page 59
SECRET
MP. Bruce A. BERTOTALLY (P)
Deaf MY. BERTOTALLY:
Reference la made to your contract with the UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT, as soprevented by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.
effective l March 1969. Eflective ! March 1970 said contract is herein
terminated by mutual convent of the parties thereto, and In lieu thereof
the following agreement la substituted.
The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, as represented by the
CENTRAL INTELLGENCE AGENCY, hereby contracts with you under
the following forma and conditions:
L. STATUS: Your legal atatus under thia contract la that of an
Independent contractor or consullible You are not considered an employe
of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT by virtue of thie contract. You
will be required to boid yourself vallablo at all times to fall requente
made of you by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY or to repond te
tasks roguented of you by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.
BER
cologist oher leful employment on occupation mot
-APPO
Instructto
hereaf bath
colved from the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
bed to you pur oant to tito contrace and within the torn
i blades upon you soft lncluded in the written torme
COMMUNCATON Inclid lion hips with the CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY you will accept requests, tasks and relevant
instrucilons from an individual hereloatter referred to au the "Authorized.
Government Represent live. " Ho will be fully nuthorized to discues
mattors with you relating to your responsibillties under this contract
including, bat not limitod to, cover arrangements, place of asalgement.
conditions of work or any other mattere relating to your relatlonablp with.
the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY..
COVER AND SECUKITY. In the performance of your
responsibilities hereunder, apropriate arrangements will be made.
regarding, cover and goneral security conditione:
you may be reguired
to executo certala documents in the course of'ostabitshing cover
arrangements but it ls to be expressly uoderstood that such documents are
solely for the purpose of cover and security and confer no additional
logal righta or obligationa and that all of your rights and obligations with
respect to the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY derive solely from this
agreement.
In connection with cover and decurity you will be provided
from time to time speckfic instructions by the Authorlzed Government
Representative and you will be required to adhere precltely to such
instructions
MICROFILMED
DOC. MICRO. SER:
SECRET,
qura;radag and
---
## Page 60
1 to the bal did d
COSIPENSATION.:
You will be compensated by the CENTANL
INTELLICENCS AGENCY at the rate of Elgiteen Thousad Elve Hundred:
Dollars ($19:502. 00f per year.. Pryient of this compensation shall be
monthly in accordance with arrangements acceptable to the Authoried
Coverament Sepresent stlve.
The sum is subject to Federal locome taxea
and to such'locome tax lawa no are splicable to your place of residence.
Additionally, ebla compongation do subject to FICA faxes.
The current
rates and method of payment will be in accordance with applicable laws and
the security instructione lasued by the Authorized Government Representative.
Paynent of all faxes and preparallon of neceusary tax returns are your
persond obligation and responsibility but in accord with approprate security
Instructions which will be furniahed by the Authorized Goverment
Representative.
5-
ALLOWANCES,
DAVEL AND OTHER EXPENSES. I, la the
course of fulles your co pond butties under thip asceement. monetary
llowancen
dunder general UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT rules and rogulationd, you will be paid ouch monetary
Nowanese ta subatantial accordance with those lawn and regulatione.
it, in the courbe of this congree, you ra directed to travel or aro
wuthorized to lacur other of
s0ed, salmbur oment for e penies wilbe
made by to CENTRAL IN
TELLICENCE AGENCY Cubatanstil accordance
MS apPuCablo CENTRAL NTELLIGENCE NGENCY cosulations
6. NEGOTIATED DE
You presentis have o private boatth laour ace plan for
yourdels and your wito patd until late Decembet 1970., Prior to
the expiration dato of the current policy the CENTRAL,
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY has the option of prying premlure
on the current polley untll I March 1972 or enrolling you in a:
hoalth Insurance program for selected contract ladividunle
of the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY subject to
all the terms and conditions of that program.
The CENTRAL
INTELLIGENGE AGENCY will pay the premium on elther
Insurance coverago undit i March i9T2. However, any now
contract wilt include an appropriate clause providing that tois
orsenisation will bear a portion of the fotal premlum cont of
any health insurance and you will bear the remaledor.
The CENTRAL INTCLLIGENCE AGENCY will endeavor
to arrange for you to secure a term We induranco policy with
a face value of $15, 000. 00: This policy contals no additional
accidental death bengfita. The premiums for the policy wr
be your personal responstbility. The current premium charge
to $12. 00 per month.
MICROFILMED
!!'L: ^ 1478
DOC. MICRO, SER.
SECRET:
g9 01. 37 23
---
## Page 61
14-00000
ci (!) Subjoce to the prioritles of work you are heroin
guthorkzed twenty-one. (21) work daya vacation with. Phy per
contract year to be taken only at times and places approved.
Lo advance by the Authorlaed Government Representative:
Vacation time la not accruable and will nos be carpled over
from year to year. Payment for unused vacation time will
not be authorized.
(2) If Incappeltated for work due to illness, injury
and the like, your compensatlon may be contiaued for periods
not to exceed a total of thirteen (13) working days por contract
year.
Poriods of abaence in excaja of three (3) Consecutive
days will require a doctor'a certiíicate.
dike vacatloo.time
this benelit in not accruablé and will not be carrled over from
year to year.
• Cash payment in lleu of this beneflt will not bo
authorized.
SECRECT OBLIGATION. You will be required to keep forever
secret this agreement and all Information which you may obtata by reason
hereot (unles; releaned in writes by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE
AGENCY (rom much obligation). With full knowledge that violation of sueb.
secrecy may hubject you to enmiant.
prosecutton undor she coptonage lam
Cod other appliesble
Your relationabl
CENTRAL INELLIGRNCE
ACENCY Cad
she contract meet bo
and you my nos disco any hopest ot this rolationablp and
contra
Repres
yes Astherland Governmen
на от
quet othee person a he may epectically epproves.
BS UNAUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS: No promlace: on:
commitments portating to righte, privileges, of benefits other than thones
expresoly stipulated in writtog ta this agreement or aby amendment thereto
whall be binding on the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.
TERM.
This agreement la effective ad of! March 1970 and
shall bo for a term of two (2) yearte
At the end of that period thie contract
shall be deemed to be ronowed for another year unlous novleered
termination has been furniahed to you thirty (39) days to adyance.
Thereafter the contrnct will be renewed automatically on similar terme
and conditions.
This contrast may be termlented at any time by either
party upon furalahlog thirty (30) days advance notice. Upon termination
ot thie contract or ronewato thoroot, including amendments, lf any. the
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY will undertake to basiat you la
obtalatos galaful employment or to provide continuiat Compensation to.
asture you that you will be abte to malotain a reasonable standard of
liviog:
This undertaklog la contlagent upon your futilillay the terma of
SECRET
MICROFiLMED
il-n 1970
DOC. MICRO, SER.
Essets-ren salaear.
dgasgrstrno.22g
---
## Page 62
the contract und the continuing compllance with the gecticy obliautton
Imposed on you by paragraph 7of hia contrace and
the grovelone or 60
recrecy
agreement which you have signed with the CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
UNITED STATES COVEKNMENT
As Reprerented by the
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
В уз
/B/
Contractloan Offleer
Dates 6 March 1970
ACCEPTED:
US/. BrUCO A BERTOTA
WITNESS
Brúc
6 MI
Certified to be& true copy of the signed original which is on file in the
Once of Security.
19 Mati
Chiel, Budget and Fiscal Branch
Office of Security.
MICROFILMEO
"! =n 1970.
DOC. MICRO. SER.
SECRET
Echend try calroat
497.3777 741
---
## Page 63
BrucE A. BERTOTALLY (P)
Dear Mi. BERTOTALLY..
The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, as represenied by the
CENTRIL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, hereby contracts with you under
the following torme and condidlone:
1. STATUS:
Your legal atatus under thilo contract la that of an
Independent contractor os consuliant. You ure not conuldered an
employee of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT-by vrtue of thie
contench You will be raquited to hold yourselt aralable at all times
to titti
gene trade of fouby he CENTRAL INTELLICENCE AGENCY
on to reapond to tooke requented of you by o CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE.
ACENCE Tou will retral from onsastes te other salati omploym
or occupation unill approvat bae boon recolved from the CENTRAL.
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Instructions furnished to you pursuant to
the contract and witals the terma hereof shall be ae binding upon you
an lt tacluded ln the written terma herrof.
? COMMUNICATION. In all relationahips with the CENTRAL
INTELLICINCE AGENCY you will accept requiete, taske and relevant
instructions from an individual herotaatier referred to as the
"Authorised Goyerni
ment Reprodentatives" He Wilr Do fully author tzed
to discuse mattere wier you rolating to your responsibilities undor cale
contract Includiag.
but not limited to, covor arrangemente, place of
assigament, conditions of work or any other matters relating to your
relationship with the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.
3. COVER AND SECURITY. ' in the parformance of your
responsibilittes hereunder, appropriate arrangementa will be made.
regarding cover and general security conditions.
You may be required
MICROFILMEO
12933-71979
DOC. MICRO. SER
---
## Page 64
to execute certal document. in the course of establishing cover
arrangements but lt la to be'expresly sderstood that auch documente
are solely for the purpose of cover and security and confor no additional
logal righta or obligations and that all al your rights and obligations with
respect to the CENTRAL INTELLIGLICI AGENCY derive solely from
this agreemont. In connection with comes end security you will be
providod iron time to time specile inviractions by the Authortsed
Govornment Ropresentitive and you inal to required to adhere precionly
to such inétructione.
4, COMPENSATION, You Wait be composited by the CENTRAl
INGELLUGENCE AGENCT be the rate of Sharge Thousand Five Madred
pollar sto
S00: 001 per
Reynges of elle compensation chall be.
monthly lo accordance with arrangen
acceptable to the Authorited
Government Representative, Thie gam la aubject to Federsi lacome
taros and to vuch income tax laws ad are applicabla to your place of
reeldence.
Additionally, this compencation to subject to FICA laxes.
The current rates and method of payment sail be la accordanco with
applicable lawe and the security instructions lasted by the Authörized
Government Roprecentadve, To assles you in establlahing yoursell, the
CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY will aBslot you in procurlos an
automobile and necessary honschold fees sturge, providing lunds therefor,
up to a maximum of Light Thougand Dotary (58: 000. 00% Payment of all
taxes and preparation of necessa
your personal
obligation and responsibility but in accord with appropriate securtly
Intructions which will be furlebed by the Authorized Government
Ropresentative.
MICROFILMED
DOC. MICRO. SER
---
## Page 65
14-000n
5. PLACE DE RESIDENCE. la the intereits of security, you will.
be required lo live in such State, ares, and houne or apartment as in
opecifically approved by the CENTUAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY after
mutual discunion and due consideration of all circumstances. All of
tho expenses of such loased house or apartment will be borne by you and
the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY will not be obligated to pay any
such éxpense
6. ALLOWANGES, TRAVEL AND OTHER EXPENSES.
Is, In the
courge of fulliuling your responsibilities mader this agreement, monetary
allowances would be payable under general UNITED STATES
COVERNMENT rules and regulatione, you will be pald such monetary.
¿Movinges la substontial accordanco with thore lows and regulatons.
It, Io the courto of hio contract, you are directed to travel or aro
authorled to ineur other expendad, reimbursoment for expenses will
be made by the CENTRAL INTELLICENCE AGENGY la substantial
accordance with applicable CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
regulation..
7. HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL CARS. The CENTRAL,
INTELLICENCE AGENCY will provide you with reasonable insurance
covering medteal care and hospitallcation equivalont to that which could
be obtaled through atandard Insurance policied: or, the CENTRAl.
INTELUGENGE NOENCY may provide diractly nuch medical care aad
hostialisadon.
8. SECRECY OBLIGATION: You will ba raquired to seep foraves
secret this agreement and all information which you may obtain by reason
hereol (unless released in writing by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE
AGENCY from such obligation", with full knowledge that violation of such
-3-
MICROFILMED
:!Lon 1970
DOC. MICRO. SER.
---
## Page 66
cocrecy may dubjecs gou to criminal prosecution under the esplonago laws.
as smonded, and other applicable laws and regulations. Your selationship.
with the CENTRAL INTILLIGENCE AGCNC! and this contract must be
kept necret and you say sot discuns any aspect of this rolatioaship and
contract with aay persos other than the Authorized Goverment
Representative of such other person as he may specilically approve.
9. UNAUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS, No promiuer.or
commitments portaining to rights, privileged, or bonaflin other than those
exprosaly atipulated in weldog ln thie agreement or any amendment therete
shalt be binding on the CRNTlAX INTeLLiGENes AGENCY,
19: JERY. Too asceoment in effectve as of 1 March 1969
and shall te for a terte of one fl yout. Al the end of that parted out
contract shot be deemed to be renewed for another your unloas notice of
termination has been furashed to you thirty (391 daye In advanço of the
olapse of one il year, Theroalter the contract will be renowed automatically
on similar terms ind conditions. This contract may be terminated at any
time by olther party upon furalahing thirty (39) days advance notico. Upon
termination of thie contract of renewals thereol, Including amondmenta.
Lany, tho CENTRAL ENTELLIGENCE AGENCY will undertake to assist
you in obtainind gainful eraployment on to provide continulag compensation
to abeure you that you will be able to plantators coasonable standurd of
living: This undertading is contingent upon your fulling the terma of
this contract ind the continuing compliance with the secrecy obligations.
MICRO-ILMED
.=.0 1070
DỌC. MICRO. SER.
---
## Page 67
imposed or you by paragraph 8 of this contract and the provisions of
any secrecy agreement whlch you have signed with the CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.
UNITED STATES COVERNMENT
As Represented by the
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Contractins Ollice?
DA
ACCEPTED:
Bate
Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in the
Office of Security:
24, 74
Howard Grun
HOWARD J:
DIRECTOR OF
ECURITY
* 196s
MICROFILMED
'"L=n 1070
DUC MIÇRO. SER.
-5-
SEXTET
1
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10071-10380.pdf | 104-10071-10380 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 04/20/1968 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CIA. | CIA. | CABLE RE PHOTOS OF RAY. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK15 : F37 : 1993.07.31.11:21:22:090063 : PHOTOS OF RAY. | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10071-10380
OUTING AND/ OR INITLALS - SEEH
405-201 FE
ЕС/JROTФ
02231
220 8P:IL. 1968
170743
cfeg
SPIC RE
109
HID COPY
SECRET
B
U по вас
FILE DE CS
RETURNT
Not Reor
20- 16.042
CHE DIRECTOR LI
133
93 2 3 0
10-3
A DIPSC JOR 931624
19600 (1791792)
ATLANTAS DIO PROTOS OF RATIO FABAND APO ADDRESS 20 AFRIT
BILL POUCH ICAS COPIES, 22 APRIL BE IT.
nasaeein ja Days pouchire Ohotos for Liaison.
Send steer copiesy photo of GalE
CT Stars Coordeby bhoneritn
An Elita
Robert D. Brown Jd
GEE/JKO
arra
COOEDINATING OF
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN TUE
Craigai
feeding
alitiestion
RAY
Riderls
SS
OFFICER
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10071-10011.pdf | 104-10071-10011 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 04/22/1968 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | FBI | CI/OBER | SUBJECT: RADIO MESSAGES FOR STOKELY CARMICHAEL DURING THE APRIL 1968 RIOTS IN WASHINGTON, D.C. | 3 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK15 : F3 : 1993.07.29.17:20:13:060058 : | 3 | ## Page 1
1104-10071-10011
I ENCLASSIFIED:
SUBJECT: 1Opr.
"ROM:
YTERNAL
-SE ONLY
J COr DENTIAL
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SECRET
CI/Ober
suilding)
"J: ¡Officer sesignation, room number, and
i.
2.
3.
DATE
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
EXTENSION
6537
OFFICER'S
INITIALS
5.
7.
3
NO.
B-89
DATE
22 April 1968
COMMENTS (Number, gea comment to
show from whors
DES ONLY
Originated by: DDP/CI/OP/Ober
22 April 68
Based on
Memorandum for
the Record br
Source of xpap
para 2 not
identified
Disseminated to: FBI on
22 Apr 68
o lip use
PENOUS
SECRET
CONFIDENTIAL
File:
TROD
PROD
B-Memos (record copy)
CC:
SEGRET
DIES ONLY
INTERNAL
USE ONLY
7518
B=89
UNCLASSIFIED
---
## Page 2
14-00000
SECRET
NO FOREIGN DISSEM NO DISSEIN ABROAD
2 2 APP 1968
SUBJECT: Radio Messages for Stokely Carmichaal
During the April 1968 Riots in Washiagton, D.C.
1. During the civil diaorders of 6 and 7 April 1968
in Washington, D.C. following the assassination of Di. Martin
Luther King. Jr., an employee of this Agency heard on his
car radio messages directed to Stokely Carmichael. The
employee does not remember the station of which the program
was broadcaat; however, he identified it as a local "rock and
roll" station which was located in the 1400-1600 range on the
AM dial.
2. An acquaintance of this empioyee also mentioned
hearing during this period messages such as "Stokely Carmichael,
please call your headquarters'; regular radio programs were inter-
upted to broadcast these messages.
Originated by: DDP/CI/OP/Ober:sg, 22 Apr 68
Based on : Memorandum for the Record
Source of paragraph 2 not identified
15-21
NA ENOCIEN MISSFM MO DISSEM ABROAD
---
## Page 3
14-00000
SECRET
22 April 1968
-ONd FOR. 773 RECORD
3.0002:
Radio messages for Stokely Carmichael during
the riots in Washington D.C.
1453
mring the civil disorders of April 6-7,
02
following the assasination
artin Luther king Jr., this writer heard on his car radio mes
sages intended for Stokely Carmichael.
Another acquaintance of mine
also -entioned hearing such messages which would interrupt the program
in progress to say, "Stokely Carmichael, please call your headquarters
(or sore similar nessage)." The exact station is unknoim to me, except
that it was in the 14001600 range on the AM dial and was a local rock-.
and-roll station.
Cours
SEGRET
2-44
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10074-10027.pdf | 104-10074-10027 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 1/6/65 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | WH/SA/IOS | WH/SA/ | MEMORANDUM: REQUEST FOR POAS FOR HOMERO ECHEVARRIA AND OTHERS. | 2 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK16 : F83 : 1993.07.16.15:21:17:460280 : | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10074-10027
6 cHenry 2969
ARE TORA 14/BN/208
RETURNTO CIA
Background Use Only
*Do Not Reproduce
BOBBLEE
BCACTATRIA ASKIN
d rach 19051
SOLFO AT CLIENTS
9 Aga 11 2922, Бачева, Ов
8007 1l. Albaaya Calesso, LUllrola
BIT
vertest of
MICROFICHE REPRODUCTIONS
DESTROY AFTER USE
---
## Page 2
00000-7L
Pons c. 1929,
ES, lates horse, cal
ANdS
FI assets 1a Cuba.
MICROFICHE REPROPUCTIONS
DESTROY AFTER USE
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-90137-10150.pdf | 124-90137-10150 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 03/24/1961 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | CR 105-97455-1 | CIA | HQ | 1 | FBI | HQ | 3/12/18 | MEMO | null | ## Page 1
124-90137-10150|
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
4/17/201
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER :
124-90137-10150
RECORD SERIES :
HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
CR 105-97455-1
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM: HQ
TO: CIA
TITLE :
DATE: 03/24/1961
PAGES:
1
SUBJECTS:
CIA LIAISON MATERIAL
EDGAR SILVESTRE REYES
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Secret
RESTRICTIONS: 1B
CURRENT STATUS: Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 09/28/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF CIA
COMMENTS :
MEMO
v9.1
HH 50953
D001d: 32337384
Page 1
2
---
## Page 2
- Mr. Hayne
1
• Liaison
n: 97455
Date:
To:
Fron:
Subject:
March 24, 1961
Director
Central
Intelligence Agency
Attention:
Deputy Director, Plans
John Edgar Hoover, Director
EDGAR SILVESTRE REYES
INTERNAL SECURITY -
[SPAIN (5)
U)
SHOT T
HERE IN S UNCLASSIFTED
ALE INFORTAATION CONTAINED
CIA 4IAG
*7 04 2 3TN TO
Hi AND/OR
A SOMaTON
, Reference is made to
Narch 10,
1961
your reference
captioned
communication dated
KP 3-23-98
CS 61 3/764,325, concerning
individual. 1)
review of
the files of this Bureau fails to
reveal any data identifiable with Edgar Silvestre Reyes.
1 - Madrid (Enclosure-ccof (CIA let dated 3/16/612
1= Mexico (enclosure-ce of CiA let gated 3/16/61)
1 - Rio de Janeiro (Enclosure-cc of CIA let dated
3716161) 44)
783 - WW05
1 - Foreign Liaison Unit
4-8-98
CLASAIFIED CY 5648 SUO/ISR
Ak: paf
(9)
8/31/43
Classified 1 5883120 fl
Declassify
56668-520/u
106-183 (5FK)
JFK)
"NOTE: CIA advised that captioned individual
born 11/8/31
in Puerto Rico; is American citizen; had studied medicine at
jon
sons.
university in Spain; had departed Spain 10/4/60; and reportedly
_is now communist leader in either Cuba or Venezuela.
CIA
nont t requested anv information
lahan -
we might have
ad
coach.
_(S)
ins.
one
en.
el-
"er -
119611
Sullivan
SECRED
3, Room
ndy
MAIL ROOM
TELETYPE UNIT
HW 50953
DocId: 32337384 Page 2
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10510-10120.pdf | 104-10510-10120 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 08/27/1965 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DR. ANTONIO MACEO | SMITH. VOCAT. REHAB. | LETTER:ATTACHED PLEASE FIND A COPY OF PREVIOUS MONTHLY COMMENTS | 2 | PRIVATE | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-64 : F7 : 1999.06.03.09:09:13:326128 : | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10510-10120
11:
it aist 2., liús
De: intonio laceo
PaDo j0x 1303
MIami, Florida 33101
6,8
Dear Do. tacos:
astached iluse find a copy oi previous muntily.camer.ts by the
Instructor it Lindooy Hopkino school regarding the above cuntioned
individual's ircicir progross Ircluding a letter dates 12/16/64.
by iarie i icirire, instructor ind a lettor of ro cat dite sroa
his Inotrictor.
Unfortunircly, tilo individurl duo to his illness i ope scion hus
baci muine entrcuig little prores drin a exterdue iloi.
"nis
"as rou conlesui lio basse drsitin: couroc and, is le corec at 211,
rolli jo into inchine dosies and a mojection bised or t tino tici
he sicat in lourning the baalc dediun vould tidicate i do would zot
Aloo there is acal concoin as to mechar is would
over caster he subject oven by 1969, thorsiore, I tilic that no inva
¿oro 2o lid dui ie can co with thia individual and Siven Mi C
opportunin but I foul that no can say mù this soint that ho cannot
bo assabilitatue and dis not trainaulo.
pocial Custo
le 13 necuitary to drop hira fron our rohabilitation furat
sincaroly yuurs,
Gordon Do Satta, Counsolor
Vocition: sonabilitation
GaJ: cab
cos farta ivans
---
## Page 2
LINDSEY HOPKINS EDUCATION CENTER
DADE COUNTY• PUDUE SCrIDORO
Da fun Felt, Deporte
8010 1. I ODOOND AVILTUR
MALA CO, 7100IA
• ..
Facilla 8-8388.
W : 1905
August 36, 1965
Ms. Gordon D. Smien
Vocational Rehabililation
Staro of Florida
Depariment of Education
1350 N. W. 12th Avenue, Room 188
Miami, Florida 33136
Doss Mr. Smith:
VOCALLUNAL RENADHCATION
Mrome Gislict Orica
at lie to seze report ol fugust 3, 1965 867 CRC student.
_do quorod belon:
"Dolinitoly nor employable al this lime. At masent sotarded sale of progross
should complete Machine Drafting 8:31-3, upproximately end of third somosies..
Angust 1969. Basic Course 4131-1 should bo complored by and of third samostar
August 6, 1965 - did not complara. Timo consumed 12 complero this 240 hou
course, 842 houli. Extremely impeded postess due to foc Englian compro
hension and medically induced slowness (Epileptic) sopcatedly noted on monthly
Rohab reports
Upon completion of the course, he would be unemployable bacauso le rakoe
him lour limos longer than the normal person to complote his work."
On sha baste of this information, perminarion or leteral transfer da recommonded.
{22KS44
Rogiatration and Staustes
EMA/ag:
lips
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10126-10082.pdf | 104-10126-10082 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 06/15/1978 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | THE DIRECTOR | SMITH, HAVILAND | NOTE RE HSCA INVESTIGATION OF THE MEXICO CITY STATION. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK57 : F2 : 20040226-1050133 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10126-10082
200-
June 15, 1978
NOTE FOR
FROM
SUBJECT
: The Director
: Haviland Smith
: The HSCA Investigation of the Mexico City Station
1. The memorandum from Scott Breckinridge, attached hereto, dated
15 June, addresses only one aspect of our problem with the HSCA.
In the
fall of this year, the HSCA will prepare a report for the Congress which will
be unclassified.
There seems every likelihood that this report, whether we
are able to contest it successfully either with the Committee or perhaps even
in the Courts, will contain sensitive information, the revelation of which
will be very damaging to our interests in Mexico. Not only will this report
active es are dainst MexiCate a Duel ence activity in Mexica Gitka which
The best example of this, but not the only
example, is their telephone tap activity, the evidence from which will be
an integral part of the HSCA's conclusions.
2. Mexico City is a focal point for Soviet intelligence operations
against the continental United States.
There is a long, documentable history
of Soviet activities based in Mexico being run into our country.
The relation-
ship that
is a critical ingredient
in our ability to protect ourselves against these Soviet intelligence acti-
vities. You will recall that the Boyce-Lee case was brought to our attention
by those elements of the Mexican government.
If, as we suspect, the Committee
publishes the kind of information spelled out above, the result on this
will be disastrous. It will seriously weaken our
ability to protect our country from Soviet intelligence activities.
3. We believe that the issues raised by Chairman Stokes in his letter
to you affords an excellent opportunity for you to underline to him some of
the problems which are inherent in an ultimate declassification and publica-
tion of the sensitive information they have gleaned from our files on general
intelligence activities in Mexico City.
This may not prove to be helpful
in dampening the ardor of the HCSA staff, but it most certainly will put
them on notice that the course they are taking will have direct repercussions
not only on CIA activities
in Mexico City, but on our bilateral relations
with that country.
177797
19998
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10185-10220.pdf | 104-10185-10220 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 07/22/1964 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | COB, MONTERREY | DEPUTY CHIEF, WH (SA) | DISPATCH:TRANSMITTAL OF SUBJECT REFERENCE LETTER FOR MAILING IN MONTERREY | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-20 : F14 : 1998.05.04.11:14:03:200120 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10185-10220
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
DISPATCH
CLASSINCATION
3. I CBST
PROCESSING
# "TICA
Chief of Baso, Monterrey
chies of station, Mexico
HEADY ANTENS DCHI
IN ATSTRACT.
-C9057
of Sutject Reference Lotter for Mailing in Monterrey
*Đ: RECHENCE
ACTION: 8eo Below
aIr: mm 1163, I3 July 1964
trinitted herewith is a letter tron Subject of Reference
for untling in Monterrey as establithed in previous
correspondence The continued expeditious: forrding to
Wendquartera, of return correspondence will be appreclated..
АССОМ
FISHED
KENKSTH I. PEILAROOX
Attachment: As stated
Diatribution:
Or 1g. &
1 - COB,
MNTY "/att.
1 = COS,
MEXI
RECLASSIFIED
PI/AHT
RI/"
WHSA/CL
ROUTING
г/рV
INITIAI
+58711
¡ CROSS REFERENCE TO
CASSACATION
SECRET
doFICE
WH/SA/CI
OFFICER
0+5-JE 57M901
DATE
WH/SA/CI
2z W44
WH/SA/EOB
19-6-102/21
264749651
DATE TYPED
DATE DISPATCHED
DISPATCH STRONA AND NUMBER
neis tenths is toes
201 - 749651
Jirk
ет.
4421
COORDINATING
OFIXERS NAME
10s
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10337-10004.pdf | 104-10337-10004 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 03/30/1995 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | PROJFILES-CIA MATTERS | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR | JOHN F. PEREIRA | CIA MATTERS - FOCAL POINT OFFICERS FOR ARRB REQUESTS | 14 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK-M-21 : F5 : 20030804-974525 : UNIT INDEX | 14 | ## Page 1
10410337.1001
ADMINFOTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
CSI-0324/95
30 March 1995
MEMORANDUM FOR:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director
Director, Center for the Study of
Intelligence
John F. Pereira
Chief, Historical Review Group
Appointment of Directorate Focal Points
for JFK Assassination Board Requests (AIUO)
1. Action Requested: It is recommended that you request
the Directorates to appoint focal point officers for purposes of
responding to requests from the (President Kennedy) Assassination
Records Review Board. (AIUO)
2.
Background: President Clinton appointed the Board to
oversee the release of records related to both the assassination
of President Kennedy and the investigations into the assassination.
The Board has forwarded to us the first (attached) of what are
likely to be many requests for additional information from CIA
records.
The Board will not complete its work until late 1997
at the earliest. (AIUO)
The Historical Review Group (HRG) has reviewed more than
400,000
pages of JFk-related records, most of which were contained
in the
"sequestered records" that were collected for the House
Assassination Committee's investigation and in the Oswald 201 file.
Up to now, no new searches have been required.
Now that the Board
has begun
to generate requests for additional information, the
Agency needs to create a mechanism for processing the requests and
for tasking components to conduct records searches. (AIUO)
3. Recommendation: That you request each Directorate to
appoint a focal point to work with HRG as the principal liaison
with the Board, and that you name someone to perform the same
unction for the DCI Area.
Attached is a proposed memorandum
for your signature.
(AIUO
John
1 F. Pereira
Attachments:
A.
ARRB Request No. CIA-1
B.
Proposed Memorandum
ADMINISTRATIVE
NAL USE ONLY
---
## Page 2
13-00000
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAE USE ONLY
SUBJECT:
DCI/CSI/HRG/JPereira:bas/x30373
(30 Mar 95)
Distribution:
Original - Addressee
1 - Executive Registry
1 - D/CSI
1 - C/HRG
2
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY
---
## Page 3
13,0.0000
SUBJECT: (Optional)
FROM: Leo Hazlewood
Executive Director
/ 7D55 OHB
TO: (Officer dosignation, room number, and
building)
1.
CAL EXDLI
7D55 JOH
2.
3.
C/EXDIR Staff
(6E0703
*OHB
4.
5.
Ed. Cohon
6.
7.
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
Appointment of Directorate
Focal Points for
JFK Assassination Board Requests
EXTENSION
NO.
ER 95-8097
8-37900 }
DATE
6 April 1995
/ 001/BEG
DATE
RECEIVED FORWARDED
OFFICER'S
INITIALS
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
07 APR
| 1836
gor
Ed-
ADD 5%
On tep of the one!
8.
10.
11.
12.
13:
14.
15.
10RM 610 (EF) SEINOUS
EDITIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
---
## Page 4
13-0.0000
ADMINISTrATIVE INTERNAL USE ONIS
ER 95-8097
6 April 1995
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Deputy Director for Administration
Deputy Director for Intelligence
Deputy Director
for Operations
Deputy Director for Science and Technology
Administrative Officer, DCI
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director
Appointment of Directorate Focal Points
for JFK Assassination Board Requests
1. I would like each of you to appoint a focal point
officer for your Directorate who would be responsible for
responding to requests for information from the (President
Kennedy) Assassination Records Review Board. (AIUO)
2. The Agency has received the first (attached) of what
are likely to be many
from the Board for information
related to the assassination of President Kennedy and to the
investigations into the assassination.
Up to now, the Board
has focused on the "sequestered" records CIA had collected
for the House Assassination Committee's investigation and
documents that had been part of the Oswald 201 file. It is
expected that the new requests will require records searches
to be done for additional information.
(AIUO)
3. The Historical Review Group (HRG) of the Center for
the Study of Intelligence (CSI), which has been the Agency's
principal liaison with the JFK Board, will continue in that
role.
HRG will receive requests from the Board, and then
forward them to the Directorate focal points for action.
Responses
from the Directorates will be coordinated by HRG,
which will make the responses available to the Board. (AIUO)
Please provide the name of your focal point officer to
John Pereira, Chief, HRG (x303737 secure) by 13 April.
(AIUO)
Leo Hazlewood
Attachment
ADMINISPRATIVE
NTERNAL USE ONLY
---
## Page 5
13-00000
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
SUBJECT:
Appointment of Directorate Focal Points
for JFK Assassination Board Requests
DCI/CSI/HRG/JPereira:bas/x303737
Distribution:
Original - DDA
Original
- DDI
Original
- DDO
Original
- DDS&T
1 - AO/DCI
1
Executive Registry
ExDir
1
1
anan
D/CSI
- C/HRG
(30 Mar
95)
AOMENESRATTVR - INERA USE-ONEX
---
## Page 6
13-00000
ra piadito
Attachment
widnisaro..nn
:ww.sannsereaiscinioes.in..
---
## Page 7
13-00000
Assassination Records Review Board
600 E Street NW O 2nd Floor O Washington, DC 20530
March 22, 1995
Mr. John Pereira
Director
Historical Review Group
Center for the Study of Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 20505
RE: ARRB Additional Information Request No. CIA-1
Dear John:
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR
RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION
IN THIS DOCUMENT
I would like to thank you and your staff for your assistance and cooperation during
our start-up phase. I trust that this bodes well for our work together during the
upcoming years.
In order to facilitate and coordinate our efforts, I will be sending to you, from time-
to-time, requests for additional information and records to facilitate the completion of
the ARRB's responsibilities under the JFK Act. We will be numbering these requests,
as shown above, to help us track our queries and your responses. Please do not
hesitate to contact me or Jeremy Gunn if our requests are insufficiently clear or if
they are unduly burdensome.
For our first request, we ask that you make available the following items:
(a)
Comprehensive organizational charts (or the best available substitutes)
of the following entities for the years 1958-1968:'
First, the Directorate of Plans (DDP or DD/P) including:
Western Hemisphere Division (DDP/WH)
Special Affairs Staff (DDP/SAS)
Task Force W
'We are of course aware that the names, organizational structure, and reporting
relationships of the entities identified below have changed over time. We have listed some
divisions, offices, and staffs in order to facilitate the identification of organizational charts. If
the Agency refers or referred to these entities by any other names or acronyms, we would of
course intend our request to include those other names or acronyms.
Telephone: (202) 724-0088 O Facsimile: (202) 724-0457
---
## Page 8
13-00000
Mr. John Pereira
March 22, 1995
Page 2
- Special Task Force Operations
боровова
Counterintelligence Staff (DDP/CI)
Soviet Russia Division (DDP/SR)
Foreign Intelligence Staff (DDP/FI)
Technical Services Division (DDP/TSD)
Records Integration Division (DDP/RID)
Division D
Western Europe Division (WE);
Second, the Directorate of Support (DDS or DD/S) including:
Office of Security (DDS/OS) (including Security Research Section);
Third, the Directorate of Intelligence (DDI or DD/I) including:
National Photographic Interpretation Center (DDI/NPIC)
- Office of Operations (DDI/OO)
Domestic Contacts Division including all DCD bases in Louisiana,
Florida, and Texas;
Fourth, the Directorate of Research (DDR or DD/R) including:
- Special Projects Branch
- Technical Services Division;
Fifth, CIA stations in
Mexico City (1960-68 only)
- Miami OMWAVE)
- other stations that we will discuss orally;
Sixth, the Inspector General;
Seventh, the Office of the General Counsel;
Eighth, to the extent not otherwise included above, any entities with
responsibility for liaison or communications with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation on matters pertaining to intelligence or
counterintelligence, and
Ninth, any other offices, task forces, units, programs, persons, or other
'If there were persons (rather than entities) tasked with the responsibility for
such liaisons with the FBI, please identify those individuals.
---
## Page 9
13-00.000
Mr. John Pereira
March 22, 1995
Page 3
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
entities with any responsibilities for surveilling, conducting operations
with respect to, or engaging in liaison with any pro-Castro groups (eg.
Fair Play for Cuba Committee) or anti-Castro groups (e.g., Alpha-66,
DRE, JURE, etc.).
The names and affiliations of all CIA personnel responsible for liaison
with the Warren Commission, the House Select Committee on
Assassinations, the House Select Committee on Intelligence of the 94th
Congress (the "Pike Committee"); the Senate Select Committee to Study
Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (the
"Church Committee"), and the Commission on CIA Activities within the
United States (the "Rockefeller Commission").
All manuals, handbooks, memoranda, or guides explaining:
(i)
the for riza tions sue read 1 division of responsibilities within
(ii)
the filing systems or filing procedures for the entities identified in
(a) above; and
(iii) guidelines for drafting memoranda or completing forms.
Examples of the type of documents we are seeking include the
Clandestine Services Instruction (CSI), the Clandestine Services Handbook
(CSHB), and the Directorate of Operations Handbook (DOHB).
Copies of the instructions, guidelines, and other materials used by your
reviewers in the review process. Barry Harrelson has already provided
some - if not all - of these materials to Jeremy Gunn.
A list or lists of cryptonyms, digraphs, codes, pseudonyms, numericals,
file identifications, or other identifications appearing in the assassination
records (to the extent that such a list or lists have been or could readily
be created).
To the extent that these materials are security classified, we will take all necessary
precautions to protect them.
---
## Page 10
13-00000
Mr. John Pereira
March 22, 1995
Page 4
I would like to thank you again for your cooperation. Please do not hesitate to
contact me or Jeremy Gunn for any clarification regarding these requests.
Sincerely yours,
David G. Marwell
Executive Director
cc: Barry Harrelson
T. Jeremy Gunn
File 4.20.41
•..
---
## Page 11
13-00000
UNCLÄSSIFIED
INTERNAL
USE ONLY
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
CONFIDENTIAL
SECRET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
Appointments of Directorate Focal Points for JFK Assassination Board Requests
FROM: Hugh E. Price
EXTENSION NO.
DD/095-1857
Deputy Director for Operations
(7 E 30 0HB
37875}
NICERSS
DATE
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
DATE
building)
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
COMMENTS a line oct so colom to eh out comman)
to whom.
1. Chief, Historical Review
Group
404 Ames B1dge
2.
3.
CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
RELEASE ET FULL
2000/
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
FORM
610 USE PREVIOU
EDITION:
SECRET
• CONFIDENTIAL
INTERNAL
USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED
---
## Page 12
13-00000
pig as
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
DO/IMS 95-069/2
95-1857
APR 1 8 1995
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Historical Review Group
FROM:
Hugh E. Price
Deputy Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
Appointment of Directorate Focal Points
for JFK Assassination Board Requests
REFERENCE:
ER 95-8097, dated 6 April 1995, Same Subject
Based upon the expectation that most of the requests will be for
information from our historical records, the Information Management
Staff will take the lead role. The focal point will be Fred Wickham, Chief,
External Support Group/IMS located in 1D4107 OHB, ext. 44448.
Hugh E. Price
cc: Executive Director
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY
---
## Page 13
13-00000
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
#/95
DCI
DA
DI
DO
DS&T
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
FOCAL POINTS FOR JEK ASSASSINATION BOARD
Doug Garthoff
Becky Rant
Jack Wright
Kathryn Dyer (backup)
Fred Wickham
37597h
137598
30554
54475
54644
44448
/ 50104
---
## Page 14
13-00000
ADMINISIBATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
21 February 1997
MEMORANDUM FOR:
John Pereira
FROM:
J. Barry Harrelson
CSI/HRG, JFK Project Officer
DI Focal Point for JFK Board
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
I have been advised byl
DIIRO, that he has replaced
Point for Assassination Records Review Board requests.
CC:
@DI
as the Directorate Focal
ADMINISTRATIVE-INTERNALUSE ONLY
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32286578.pdf | 124-10195-10354 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 02/23/1961 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 92-2781-136 | DIRECTOR, FBI | SAC, TP | 1 | FBI | HQ | 3/5/18 | 1 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
6/11/201
AGENCY:
RECORD NUMBER :
RECORD SERIES :
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
FBI
124-10195-10354
HQ
92-2781-136
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM:
TO :
TITLE:
SAC, TP
DIRECTOR, FBI
DATE: 02/23/1961
' PAGES:
1
SUBJECTS :
LST, SUR, RES, TELCAL
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS: 4
CURRENT STATUS : Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW:
- 10/01/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE
COMMENTS :
rcc...
v9.1
DocId: 32286578
16
Page 1
---
## Page 2
FD-3L(Rev. 12-13-56)
FBI
Date:
2/23/61
Transmit the following in
Via
AIRTEL
PLAIN TEXT
(Type in plain text or code)
AIRMAIL
(Priority or Method of Mailing)
TO:
DIRECTOR, FBI (92-2781)
EROM:
SAC, TAMPA (92-1)
SANTO TRAFFICANTE, JR., AKA
AR
ReBuairtel to SAC, New York, dated 2/15/61 entitled
"Criminal Intelligence Program"
DAILY AIRTEL
Spot surveillanges conducted 2/21/61 at subject's
residence, 2505 Bristol Avenue, and the Columbia Restaurant,
Tampa, negative.
FRANK FALSONE, PCI (protect identity), advised 2/21/61
subject has not been seen at Columbia Restaurant, his usual spot,
for approximately one week.
Pretext telephone call to residence to person
identify-"
ing self as daughter elicited information subject out of town,
whereabouts unknown and she did not know where or how to contact
him.
3 - Bureau
2
Tampa
SJL: jn
(5)
REC- 44
92-7781-136
112 FEB 25 1961
C c: Wick,
.
CRIL
Approved:
5 0 MART
196 Pecial Agent in Charge
Sent
_M
Per
DocId: 32286578
Page 2
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10428-10260.pdf | 104-10428-10260 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 10/8/63 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | RUSS HOLMES WORKING FILES | DIRECTOR | MEXICO CITY | CABLE: ACC LIENVOY 2 OCT 63, AMERICAN MALE WHO SPOKE BROKEN RUSSIAN | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK-RH16 : F17 : 20040330-1069409 : | 1 | ## Page 1
110410428-10260]
1229
1301
ORIG.:
EXT.:
DISTR.:
(44)
LADILLINGER
XXXX
TO
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE
Commo: Chrone:.
Sor Contacts J0-&x10-3
SECRET
CLASSIFICATION
DATE: 8 OCT 1963
FILE:
DEFERRED
ROUTINE
PRIORITY
OPERATIONAL
IMMEDIATE
INITIALE
DIG.
NUMBEP.
INITIALS
DIR
INFO.
CITE MEXI
645ü
NUMBER
IC IMPROVE
1.
ACC
ITENVOY JI OCT 63, AMERICAN MALE WHO SPOKE BROKEN RUSSIAN SAID HIS
NAME LEE OSWALD (PHONETIC), STATED HE AT SOVEMB ON 23 SEPT WHEN SPOKE WITH
CONSUL WHQM HE BELIEVED BE VALERIY VLADIMIROVICH KOSTIKOV. SUBJ ASKED SOV
GUARD IVAN OBEDKOV WHO ANSWERED, IF THERE ANYTHING NEW RE TELEGRAM TO
WASHINGTON. OBYEDKOV UPON CHECKING SAID NOTHING RECEIVED YET, BUT REQUEST
HAD BEEN SENT.
2. HAVE PHOTOS MALE APPEARS BE AMERICAN ENTIRING SOVEMB 1216 HOURS,
LEAVING 1222 ON 1 OCT. APPARENE AGE 35, ATHLETIC BUILD, CIRCA 6 FEET, RECEDIN
HAIRLINE, BALDING TOP. WORE KHAKIS AND SPORT SHIRT.
SOURCE: LIEMPTY.
3. NO LOCAL DISSEM.
DIP OF
5
eriginaled. by
1. A. BILLENPER (P)
SOORDINATING OFFICERS
SECRET
CLASSIFICATION
OUTGOING
WCCURT IS
RELEASING OFFICER
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10254-10015.pdf | 104-10254-10015 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 11/22/1963 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | MFF | LAUREANO BATISTA FALLS | SUBJECT: MOVIMIENTO DEMOCRATICA CRISTIANO. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK44 : F16 : 1998.03.17.21:19:09:606102 : CORRECTED TO 1 PAGE VICE 3. | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10254-10015
'ECRF?
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM
SUBJECT
:
THE FILES
MOVINIENTO DEMIOCRATICA CRISTIANO
#353 012
1. Subject Organization is of interest to CA/1 because it
forwarded the attached letter (prepared by Laureano BATESTI falla---
212 635) to Bela Kiraly of the Hungarian Freedom Fighters Inc.---a
Office of Security data concerning Subject Organization or the writer
of the letter. I there was nothing unfavorable available concerning
then them to me to ten me teet with the wee tateve
could be of
help to subject group.
A review of Office of Security records revealed that Subject
Organization is an Anti-Castro group and that the writer of the letter
was of interest to the Agency under an Operational Approval in 1960.
cc: 212 635
GROUP 1
Eneloded trom automail:
donograding 196
deciassificallon
5/MJ
SECRET
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10178-10074.pdf | 104-10178-10074 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 10/17/1960 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | WITHHELD | WITHHELD | 1 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK64-14 : F15 : 1998.03.07.08:25:59:750108 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10178-10074
DArE
114
17 OCTOBER 19688
TO
DIRECTOR
15-19
PROM, LUXEMBOURG]
ACTION:
6/51/0%
INTO !
C/Fl, G/EE !,
CLASSIFIED MESSAS
SECRET
BOUTINO
NE,: 3/6 8
TO
Ocr 17
10 2340
REG'O CABLE SECT.
ROUTINE:
IN 28612
20-19
CITE [LUXE 8252
15-19
PRITY ERAN
INFO
DIR
vit jar D7 26817 (0ur 80536) •
FOR RABLEY: MANKEL AVAILABLE.
END OF MESSAGE
S COMMENTS STATED IF MANKEL AVAILABLE WEEK 17 OCT RABNEY WOULD CONTACT JOUVEM
IRECTLY TO ARRANGE MEETING WITH MANKEI
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER
AN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.
17 OCT 1960
Copy-No.
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-10273-10041.pdf | 124-10273-10041 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | 06/13/1975 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 62-116395-340 | AG | DIRECTOR, FBI | 7 | FBI | HQ | 3/12/18 | Review PDF 62-HQ-116395 340_341-343_344_345X-347 pages: 317 | null | ## Page 1
124-10273-10041
SECRET
to Mr. W. M. Felt
Memorandum
Re: LIAISON SECTION
with other agencies is handled by domestic liaison supervisors dealing with
those agencies. In similar fashion the British will not furnish derogatory (5)
information directly to the Department of Defense in connection with its
background-type investigations but require that such data be channeled
through FBI. These are just two of the instances in which a foreign liaison
... matter becomes a domestic liaison matter and should be under the same
supervision.
Our foreign offices are necessarily closely involved in the
operations of several U. S. agencies and require domestic liaison with those
agencies. Our many problems surrounding the establishment and maintenance
of foreign offices have to be coordinated with the Department of State. It is
essential that we know and have access to the proper official at State in order
to solve problems faced by the Legats as without prodding State moves very
slowly. Our foreign offices work closely with the Central Intelligence
Agency(ClA) stations abroad. CIA Headquarters does not permit its overseas
stations to disseminate information to other agencies overseas, including our
Legats, except in unusual circumstances. They frequently, however, suggest
to our Legats that CIA Headquarters be asked for particular items.
These
can most rapidly be secured by direct request from a domestic liaison
supervisor.? In a number of areas, our Legal Attaches work closely with (S)
local representatives of the U. S. military. Leads are passed to our Legat
which are then followed up by liaison contacts in Washington with the appropriate
military headquarters.
Liaison, or, in other terms, the establishment of a harmonious
relationship, is basically the same whether practiced in Washington or Tokyo.
I feel that it would be to the Bureau's advantage to have our liaison operations
closely coordinated and directly supervised in the same area.
This has proved
to be an efficient and productive arrangement in the past, and we believe that
the re-establishment of limited direct liaison in Washington should be handled
by the same
supervision which has been given to our posts abroad. The work in
both areas is primarily intelligence oriented, yet does not fall within the
normal responsibilitios of the present operational sections. It is considered
that we should not leave the foreign supervision in its present area, which is
fully occupied with Arab terrorism, Chinese espionage, and Cuban, Arab,
Chicano and Jewish extremists.. A logical and economical step would be to
make the present foreign liaison supervision an integral part of the new
liaison section. Under this arrangement, the foreign liaison supervision
would be handled as a separate and distinct unit composed of the three
supervisors presently engaged in this work. This unit would be completely t
= 2 -
CONTINUED - OVER
JFK
(i)(B)
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10217-10011.pdf | 104-10217-10011 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 03/18/1948 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF S | HARVEY, WILLIAM K., PBS | LEO YCHUDA CHERTOK, WITH ALIASAS LEO Y. CHERTOK AND LEO V. CHERTOK. | 4 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-52 : F7 : 1998.04.21.17:16:35:543031 : | 4 | ## Page 1
104-10217-10011
/-
18 Krich 1548
11 ins
citrus
gie subjocts
Ino Ychuin Cle.00i, with alloons leo do Cherbik as
Ie Vo Chorenk
manand ly the Forloal luman ef form bloodless de Clar 100g0r1110L lema
000 Ercou.
• Thoro posible, in pertliont inlivion in contact witt
sos Informale asad assistinco
and for tho Inforntion and diJUo sf bin tirrelor
ENCLOSURE
REGISTRY COPY
SECIST
23
---
## Page 2
•... .
--..
6 March 1'42
CATAL IN 1109X3: AL17
Jero Vo 5105Lc26
a toiler of all 6i0 traces Cucurani: l.5.
for your tortion.
To enteril 1ha laitia Claios In bolis
1o Tid Can Z22007:262812022
coatinonly since that tire Hir. tai5, iscy
:35:i0d on
January 1, 1227 at iri Jon. Citi, 1ns bund 191 mIle Cio: ay 3, 10020 Cranig
fathor, josesi, baccao a naturalincú do jo citina 1:
1011308-076610e21r1
aboat I9lê and, consegucaly, dare da ca da tea cacira la tirinatio.
In 2045 charon filed ablicatic ala Lie "tara
L'o So prosuot for t:0 pause 0r d busines trip ta lalini, irrier, and locala.
lis application for tilla
anyone lag sodeed ?-
• Is calliately
of ta 1e0a0ler 130 d6 Cit
arcHid 1939 si7 113 801011:1109568401.6411
tensivo concuralia in in loala sera
8u1N 51.01a.8::
Stato Impariat doo choraleant don tru die la list 6i 7 80%
to tho cordot union and propoacd the ec1 e: 11:0.12'.
a can of 30,00,0 for da piro can 05 233
rocairod in payaani dor incrican products ali que to sho isio
In Coloser 19.2 tha 19X Lublinoi Mu 1a:c:L9t1a 00 1-0 192013
CiTa05 bared on inforration accivil to tis ef gie tial i 380.100 30% casin"
had boca shird to hin at tin total infit, i dor, do?e
anis Incidunt fallod to soflot sa inulliracu mislence, la: id sortess
Mial Clin had acrilrod a Miu Mutation 30 40 0000n2151 1à 09:12205 209
What the bons cailn: had boch rhapsed to bis in aonnersion tits cints on lir
part to procuro la so and lican corara Giu call aet=.
'äre
-:=
---
## Page 3
as siderine dog Disto 16 me diersdend Wise 61:552818 10 2240000
that it-s. + a 50.980-891-0- 63:081116 a118 06
a30.7l.
It 8.3 aleu snailad 1a 2iba Sier6: 16 88 018001 00 175..: 414t
2, a to la la born tim cogot ore 30600
8086050059116.8
11aT
05,1018:00701.
recortla: to
waves an abeady de parver. as
an a.,3t of luch tha 0341 (007 20il) nad liri lory lucill core.
Inartich as this Initial Invusl1:allon of CHu: 1a110: 1o rifloct
his Inaliestion in intollienco activitio:s
08 80511 22, 1gko
basis of on cno.-oue lotier pontarid 1o: 13,
Nitro! thE C:100E H1C 170 10.01010 1 t0
Cia of i0:0: but no virile romas of 02:16g
c220td22
a persoral friona of covio. trial in dos Cosit utin 1p'%:
il, gigs, it Will in
call, tea illies 17 a plino accide
in l'axico ist,
1h9 S9dl01
stated Liat C:::70r lirindo: du visit
frogiently sistend the corint Coulate dis in
Train: Corm-c10n 11 40r Tork,
Bit alie"a! li thu Retico d'at Cilil6r hal
it
illend entail
1s. L1
10,1108:9078
161316-
106!032°g
torati: to muce this cornalin tair:941010: -80-19-11-8
pris
deith cinal, inleila: lin no lero% ladlie:
..!a
Lice on duno 25, 1925 les Mote to CarlTo! Maldi, enro, 89161805
01il 11505 sarine cho pascadio: to piers.
antos onscarmin: the valuo or lis Sorot Coincts fur Lin piT, vino
It man alia arcortilnal unal tho gpanina di làn
macing de 18
notod, do the primary sorlor jusciusin: radium la llas U, So Miú me diálcial
---
## Page 4
Inand to ing
110n In Do ruportlin do dia 20I N.3 ausE iti 18l.%
Corporatin: la lar inc: Sor 1ionalin1 C0:d.191: 811669 10 C01: 006101 i6
Forld iar II.
1/28ch
as para char
TTC.
N427220/262000:00 1202103
defrontier
ad 1:0? (now 1173)
806 X107 30 811
Pli e::1l d991 .19
Todo 290-91610+69 6994486
vostijillun o sic! by the 11'1 1a cunidaly ras lin Ls 666. 5. 6.1190
6a l'2och 29, 2966 -1a11:
Le tus pel agronel era toda orde do dito dae Ditando escaraay
19A.11
18: 888 Milh
ai lor d:e
soviet uttiell: concernln, lão coollo tio fo a rios do Local. Lo Ma ioriot
Valone
CamaRol D0d0118 -100-150gle
sou lot infra-e
Ca, lide 908, 4:3: 80%, 809 9118
0191.01..18)18110
199:0e cail fasaio
1808:8 6686-9
livino.
Imineh ao Chie 10v0019 HlIn, 18. 01919 °nte 190 C01208: 10615.31
Oro Tir
A comilato rurer has loen cala dê de 150 filos conesring CH320%e
The only pertinant sililiaial 1: fortior. Cit: 1:01 Larei 1i snit 6ão irresi
= 3=
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10180-10216.pdf | 104-10180-10216 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 01/01/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | MR PETER J DIGERVENO | CONTRACTING OFFICER | CONTRACT UPDATED. | 4 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-16 : F12 : 1998.06.17.11:25:03:686108 : | 4 | ## Page 1
104-10180-10216
"An.
Mr. Palert. DigorTers
Dans Mr. Digarsesos
153317.991.
Band castract do desol sorrlicated by 570648 8000938
The tolled Stases Coveranent as sapponeniod Of Bho Car.
NoT the sno of your carvice dad to parlormaco ol delion of a coallo i-
dentil mature sador to follows 10r401816054681
1. Compensaloo, la full conslderaldon for Po sia 06 your
corried and tho performance of special conadental dudes gos vill
Do compenanted In an amoral calendled de lar Fata d 59100 por assa.
ln conformanco with and enojoct is the gallelon of tale ofiaolasti
Pretemly 1111 Preslia Fay la da accord agoal to Siftees par i63t (155)
paid you direcily or gue ranited by to companan sia. thie peragraph
conotitto locome for Todorsi la, purposes. Too wiil to sortein no do
an Tell an tha procedaros used by pala or partialios du leapioner l
lar reportiny respossillline wiil be baned primarily 10oa cor as 1a1
Nс4718Y 16409934110
Unloso procladed by nuch rogulrecesis, taneo
will be withhold therefrom and entailed 6y 1440498514316
2. Irare'
You will bo advasced or rolnsuread fade for
Bravel and transportation esponsos for poo, pour depandesis and your
• Doroundor, sul for you b'aro for aultoried aparational starel. ton
moy ho entitiod do por alim in llen ol vabalutence 1s the comaso of all
ErsTal parforased haround r and, who antsorised, sor you alons malle
travol, transporailos ssd par dier provided los udas this paragrapa
object lo payment 011 50-astay locompiano rita napless 8630099
laellily, mairiams da diraclad by lao Gorezareas.
To's will ho almaced of taletarced
---
## Page 2
14-00000
11,
4 2095799
Il le Fucognitud tha1 poz Laliato do Ascosal
edusea o? asy portia 150se0l fson day medles dio you podor lo dorso
3. Dosatiro fal You will ho astiliad to deala and disability
Dunolla anal la l-06 anserined ador the Sedera S3Dl01900 C-
pra det5- a Allo do arrendodo Chalmi by pol, yoor hairg, or logal repto-
PAraonA Aet (50 D.8.60.A00 App. 1601-1828)
(+) Tho Unite Nate GenIt
hold 15950 tho compantalla dal poemdar thie consei social doteray
dodondas 1560505100066 mica the Basti degentty Aes el el de
MAIORINA, SAN IA PrOCONTON N ILO ODIAMOTOS (20SEAR1T 8-4153
Dy you oy en you badel 1d0y 1000044n 01 be tarere di Ol
BI BITON ORA placas approred La nevaDeo by Appropliale daveranod
(0) Tou ars berela anchered to apple fes
mollmoal t o bella larruce pregaam la onptata seleuled Contrant
to boar a sorsion al ton premiam c00l, pua síli tar te raraianer.
Your Mantelal +681-s199t1il boetinald +44+s 9711771840664110
os ty d'Irie realando da pastodle larruale lo lo deteriend by bio
lil Tosarebaten 6362071211 7986-99430
чbo10 (0S1941171055edb0speloln+11410183155301
---
## Page 3
22
N+- 08 88022650NS COTAACTIONS
copters of lie i. d.
Proceduraliy, daed 01101470910 tilibe aliced salaat
By the Werner butter oN In FeeTa 0000 01 210
Gone due goT cades B36 Mi
Elesto
T.
1l, la tho pertaroraco of corriede
andcho ins cantody ol Covarmas: terda er
ento clile ol record lo properly at any scinto malodorar sad aberores
aluard, which propriy bao In luel bede Feschesed iles sonist o1 tae
U. 9. Coroismeal, you harosy socogalla and aetnow'ouga le antiteaco
ordense this relationeer.
lo coatrai and all delorenlos ubled you may obtala by sezaos barool
and pennecation soder toy darlosage dant, taied ly duen 154ã, da assesad.
matructless roceived by you spora coo
21371101 1INI 1UID DISCO ATON HE TA
bareal.
DIVEly -1000i is Trid some 19Y 3006913 tArte
Torm, Thin contract le ofloctire so of l Septerades
19t1o and nell 20nane therealias ius a parlod d too (3) yoss valedo
(a) Egan Pality (14) daya' acteal musts by astaar prety
loreto, on
11) Upas Arteal noles do you to too stani eso pastica
al su enlilaliy repairal medieni enamirailor aro doter.
---
## Page 4
estondos pos aoice len the Gamranta Ite 0veat 06 v0I-4a1
prlos do lao espirados of ltio agronment of any renored lernol. yu
olil nas ho snallod lo rotoro aravel expondo lo your parasauca plaço of
UNITID DIATES COVICINMXNT
Contracting Olfiett
ACCEPTHO!
APPROVEDI
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10180-10187.pdf | 104-10180-10187 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 11/11/60 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | HAVANA | CABLE-COVER COMPANY HAS INSTRUCTED HIM LEAVE CUBA. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-16 : F11 : 1998.06.14.11:55:11:373107 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10180-10187 *
106
= : 11 NOY 60
¿ DIRECTOR
* HAVANA
CRON I WH9
150
• COP, ADOP/A, S/C 2
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE
ROUTING
3
File
201
NOV 11 1100z 60
PRIORITY
IN 41186
PRITY DIR CITE HAVA 6888
JMNET
AMIRE-L'S COVER COMPANY HAS INSTRUCTED HIM LEAVE CUBA.
IF HE STAYS HE WILL LOSE THE S3BB A MONTH GUARANTEED SALARY
THAT HE WAS GETTING FROM THE COMPANY EFFECTIVE I NOV 60 SAYS
ME CAN REMAIN ON HIS OWN WITHOUT A COMPLETE BREAK WITH THE
COMPANY, BUT THAT HE MUST HAVE AN ADDIT S38D A MONTH RETROACTIVE
TO 1 NOV.
AMERE CARRYING HEAVY LOAD, TAKING HEAVY RISKS
AND MAINTAINING FAMILY IN SEPARATE ESTABLISHMENT. IN PBRIME.
RECOMMEND APPROVAL®
ADVISE SOONEST•
FILED 181625Z
END OF MESSAGE
Code,
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMISITED.
Copy No.
→ Bird
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-90012-10033.pdf | 124-90012-10033 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 12/16/1963 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 105-124552-2 | HQ | MM | 4 | FBI | HQ | 3/12/18 | MEMO | null | ## Page 1
124-90012-10033
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
6/15/201
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER: 124-90012-10033
RECORD SERIES: HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
105-124552-2
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM: MM
TO: HQ
TITLE :
DATE :
PAGES:
SUBJECTS :
12/16/1963
4
MARIO OSCAR BALDATTI BRIEBA
BERNARDO ALVAREZ
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Secret
RESTRICTIONS: 1A
CURRENT STATUS: Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 06/12/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF CIA
COMMENTS: MEMO
v9.1
NH 50953
DooId: 32323264
Page 1
---
## Page 2
IONAL FORM NO,
UNITY * STATES PERNMENT
Memorandum
TO
Director, FBI
REX DATE:
05G: 1 6 1963
FROM
SAG, Miami (105-
3175) (P)
CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO
DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR,
CHANGED
RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION
SUBJECT:
5-9-98 MARIO OSCAR
BALDATTI
BRIEBA,
akaHIS DOCUMENT ExCEP
CLASSIFIED BY 5668 SU/SMario Oscar Baldatti,
JECLASSIFY ON: 25X
JFK D-iMM3-254k4
Maria Baldati
rept 413S 4-3-4
IS - CUBA
NEUTRALITY MATTERS
3÷7
013333043
tora: 0860109060
SEr
SIDE
CLASSIIOATION
ACTION
Title changed to reflect the complete name
of subject according to Spanish usage, that is, MARIO
OSCAR BALDATTI BRIEBA, and also the name by which he is
generally known; MARIO OSCAR BALDATTI, spelled with double
Reference Bureau letter to Miami, 110/71
enclosing a CIA Information
Report
Wlan
#B- 3/656/9305 ca
to Bomb Ship."
2016)
Losed for the Bureau are
copies
Of LHM
\dated.
and "captioned as fabove.
VELOVD'#
classifie
BOSECRET
It' contains
Inorgero
MM TAERES
with referenced Burear
Report received
1s also
designatedle
òi the contact with EX
representative
Miami, Florida on October 23, 1963
DEG
/Florida.
UMM, Te2 torecord of Local Draf
Base 147, 38
600
CIA Agentcat Miami,
torias advised he had been
124552
Bureau
2
Mlami
JJO :JMS
Copy iò:
(4)
Sinte,
REG
15-01
INS-425 a
Customs 281A
+ 205-111-4-6-64
Critiate
res will 462 14-11-641
SECRET
1 08G 18 1963
MINATION
DISSIN
tiate....
NH 50953
D001d: 32323264
Page 2
---
## Page 3
MM 105-8175
SECRET
the contact of free lance pilot DAVID BROWN, and that after
the original allegation was received from BROWN the latter
was instructed to immediately contact CIA in the event
further developments took place in the alleged plan of
subject BALDATTI. Mr.I
tated he had not been
contacted again by BROWN and he was relatively certain
that the alleged plan had not further materialized. at
least as far as BROWN would be concerned. Mr.
advised that his office hading
pbjection to contact of
BROWN by FBI, Miami. Ela
22005.1.3rd Aive
ender
Aversa
Records of Immigration
and Naturalization Ser
VICe (INS), Miami, reflect that RUBEN RICARDORAVERSA,
Allen RegiStreation #12 912 525 who it is recalled is
listed by subject BALDATTI in his Draft Board registra-
tion as the person always knowing his address), arrived
at Miami on April 10, 1962 from Argentina with a resident
visa.
This is the same date Subject BALDATTI arrived
in the United States with a resident visa.
AVERSA was born October 2, 1935 in Buenos.
Alres, Argentina, and is married to JILLIAN OF LILLIAN
LESBITIAPORTER, a person of British nationality.
The INS file indicated that as of January, 1963, AVERSA
was employed by the Maru Irading Corporation, Pan American
Bank Building, Miami.
Avera
Copies of LHM are being sent locally to CIA,
Customs, INS, Border Patrol, FAA,3n3 State Department,
Coordinator of Cuban Affairs, ONI, OSI and G-2.
MIAMI, at Miami, Florida
(1) Will contact U.S/ Border Patrol and FAA,
Miami, to
ascertain if subject may be known to engage
in flying
REVIEWED BY ESWUFK TASK FORCE
ON
9/4/2d2
A RELEASE IN FULL
SECRET
•J RELEASE IN PART
J TOTAL DENIAL
SECRET
d9915-19033
NH 50953 DocId: 3232326 Page 3
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10126-10253.pdf | 104-10126-10253 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 06/28/1978 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | JOURNAL OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL WEDNESAY 28 JUNE 1978. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK57 : F9 : 1993.08.07.07:05:30:750027 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10126-10253 •
Tenserony
• Journal - Office of Legislative CounschRETURNTO GIA
Page 3
Wednesday - 28 June
1978
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
7. (Secret - MMP) LIAISON Julie Wotzel, NSA, called to
adviso
us that a lettor was coming over from
NSA to Lyle Miller,
Acting Legislntixe.Counsel, on the subject of the leak of NSA's
ability to read
diplomatic traffic.
She said that the
lotter states that NSA"has no objoction to the Director's
provision of NSA's damage assessment to the House Permanent.
Select Committee on Intelligence.
The letter goes on to state
that NSA does not feel that it would be appropriate to reveal.
the names of Congressmen and staff who are aware of NSA'S
capability to read
diplomatic traffic inasmuch as the
Attorney General is investigating the leak.
8. (Confidential - MMP) LIAISON Called Luch Johnson,
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence statt,
to advise
him (based on information provided by Suzanne Black, Office of
Public Affairs), that the Agency has no past or present substantive
involvement with WEIA. J
in response to a previous
request from Johnson.
I also asked Johnson how much information
he wished us to provide him on the Agency's relationship with
public television.
He indicated that he is only interested in
a brief sketch of
what kinds of relationships the Agency may have
had with public television and I passed this requirement on to
Ns. Black.
9 .
(Confidential • DFM) LIAISON Received a call from
Ed Greissing, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staff,
regarding the House Satect Committoc on 1s of testimon equest
tor access to Church Committee transcripts of testimony by
Agency employees.
I asked him to send Ted Shackley's
testimony to
me so he could review it before giving approval.
I reminded him
that Mr. Sanchez had asked that his testimony
not be shown and that that should be considered the final
Agency response.
10. (Secret - DFM) LIAISON Called Earl Eisenhower, Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence staff, who mentioned he would
like the briefing on counterintelligence to be presented to
the Committee during the first week of August. I later picked
up a letter from Eisenhower on this subject.
We confirmed
tomorrow's briefing of four Committee stati members to cover
the Martha Peterson case, specifically the allegations of
poison pills; the discovery of the antenna in the chimney of
the Moscow Embassy; and the Shevchenlio case.
Eisenhower
repeated his carlier request to Lyle Miller, Acting
Legislative
counsel,
for a trip to NPIC to viewWrangel Island which is part
›f the USSk but which some U.S. citizens claim really belongs to
the U.S. Eisenhower had viewed maps of the Island but wants to
see photographs as none of the mays are more recent that ten
ycars old. I agreed to try to
set this meeting up for Friday,
30 June.
20437
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10178-10134.pdf | 104-10178-10134 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 04/19/1968 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | WITHHELD | CABLE- 19 APR BOTH LA PA Z MORNING PAPERS CARRIED PAGE 1 WIRE SERVICE PHOTOS OF FBI WANTED POSTER. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK64-14 : F21 : 1998.03.07.12:19:19:090108 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10178-10134
CANET SEE RATANIAS DISSERATI
a Find canoeino
ADVANCEGUIY
01894915960€
TOTAL COMES
SECRET
S8 Mour Fulled Iral
MENANDUE DON OF TRISELY PROMISITIO
CLAUDITY TO MURA NO
A PRO PO PIANO.
294 041) I 18 TIALS - SEIN BY
D181ah mY
B8 mo.com
10-16
S EiR ET E APP OS CITE [LA PAZ 4228
& IRECT UR
SABAr WOrUSE
REF: DIRECTOR $2664
lo PLEASE POUCH PHOTO.
2. 19 AYR BOTH LA PAL MURNING PAPERS CARRIED PAGE 1
WIRE SERVICE PHOTOS OF FOI WANTED POSTER•
3. NO STATION TRACES.
SECRET
ET
indisca
TIRAVE PROGRAM
TABSIRACI
STBAI REST. CADE
CARE DEIN (UD)
Too (0)
10a 686
DESENSTIZCI
EU DOI IU-18
RECORD COPY
SECRET
19 pile68
661232232
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10217-10151.pdf | 104-10217-10151 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 7/8/70 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | WH/MIAMI | CABLE RE: AMCALL-1'S WIFE TOLD GORDON M. BINIARIS ON 27 JUNE THAT AMSOUR 1 CASE HAS NO SOLUTION | 3 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-52 : F13 : 1998.05.03.18:00:22:356115 : | 3 | ## Page 1
104-10217-10151
*'st
CABLE SECRETARIAT DESEMHATION
• PRASCHEZONT METERS
INUES
LASSIFIED MESSAGE
SECPET
When Filled lad descens
ROUTINO AMBISA MILLE SUEN I
6
AFe.
EL ASIPY TO CS FRE NO.
MAGE TO ES TRE NO
O PLEAD
O RETURE TO
BETION
C/ wHs
FILE, VR
829
"S§ CRES 8814BAZ JUL 18 CITE VIVELANI 8181
DIRECTOR INFO
• RYBAT TYPIC AMERU AMCALL AM SOUR
8JAM 118808
REF A DIRECTOR 048796
B WHAT 8138 (~ 116495)
1o AMCALL-J'S WIFE TOLD GORDON M. BINIARIS ON 27 JUNE THAT AMSOUR-I
CASE HAS NO SOLUTION, NOT EVEN BEING STUDIED FOR POSSIBLE SOLUTION AND BOC
HAS NO INTENTION OF EVER STUDYING CASE FOR SOLUTION. FIDEL. CASTRO-REGARDS
ANSOUR-! AS DIRECT BETRAYAL OF PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP. CASTRO FREQUENTED
HOME OF AMSOUR-1O AMSOUR-I CAUGHT WITH MICROFILM IN WHICH CASTRO'S
MOVEMENTS VERE BEING REPORTED ON DETAILED BASIS. CASTRO TOOK IT AS
PER SONAL AFFRONT AND BETRAYAL OF FRIENDSHIP.
2. ON SEVEN JULY BINIARIS AGAIN QUERIED AMCALL-L'S WIFE RE AMSOUR-I
•SE. SHE STATED THAT, SHE ONLY REMEMBERED THAT AMECRU-I HAD STATED THIS
CASE HOLLD BE MOST DIFFICULT TO SOLVE BECAUSE IT WAS IN THE SAME CATEGORY
AS THAT OF HUBER ROGELIO MATOS BENITEZ (201-266268). SHE THEN FOLLOVED
THE SAME RATIONALE AS PARA ONE. SHE ADDED THAT THE AMSOUR-1 CASE "HEANT
NOT KING TO HER BECAUSE SHE VAS NOT PERSONALLY INOLVED IN IT AND BECAUSE
• AMERU- MAD HAD ONLY TOUCHED ON IT VERY LIGHTLY DURING THEIR MEETING IN
MADRID:
3. -
'ASSUMPTION REF B PARA THO CORRECT, POSSIBLE REASON WHY MONEY HAS
==
SECRET
---
## Page 2
14-00000
is 70-8-0-79720-00210
-CABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMINATION
1 PERSONUNIT NOTEIRD
ADVANCE COTT
ROTTER
#57.
• DHARM BY
ACTION UNIT
• ACTION NO
то AT0-
FE#.
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE TOTAL COPIES
170092639
REPRODUETION OF TAIS CORT PROMIBITED
NOIR DI D
CLASSIFY TO CS FREDO.
RAKE TO CS FILEND
D FLERE D RETURN TO.
ROUTERO ANDIOR ANTIALE-FELD BY
• BRANCH
FILE, VR
PAGE 2 UNMIAMI 8181 SECRET
YET TO BE DEPOSITED DUE TO SEVERAL TELEGRAPHIC ERRORS. ORIGINAL CABLE
SENT BY BINIARIS UNDER NAME OF MOTHER OF AMPANIC-7. CABLE
DELIVERED WITHOUT SIGNATURE (ACCORDING TO AMECRU-12. ON TWENTY THREE
JUNE AMERU-I SENT RETURN CABLE TO MOTHER OF AMPANIC-T ASKING IF
ORIGINAL CABLE CORRECT SINCE NO SIGNATURE, AMEGRU-I ASKED THAT REPLY
BE SENT TO HILBERTS PARK HOTEL IN GERMANY. NO CITY GIVEN IN ADDRESS.
AND CABLE SENT AS INSTRUCTED. IT RETURNED TO SENDER DUE TO INCONPLETE
ADDRESS. ON TWENTY SEVEN JUNE, BINIARIS INSTRUCTED WIFE OF AMCALL-!
TO SEND CABLE TO CORRECT ADDRESS. INSTEAD WIFE OF AMCALL-I VISITED
MOTHER OF AMPANIC-7 AND REQUESTED MOTHER SEND CABLE TO AMECRU-I.
MOTHER AGREED TO DO 1 KIS. HOWEVER UP TO PRESENT TIME OUTGOING COPY
UNOBTAINABLE SINCE BINIARIS CANNOT ASK FOR IT AND VIFE OF ANCALL ANCALL-1
DOES NOT VANT TO ASK FOR IT. TO SOLVE PROBLEM BINIARIS ASKED AMSIGH-2
TO VIRE AMEORU-1 AND ASA HIM WHY MONEY HAD NOT BEEN DEPOSITED AS
INSTRUCTED. AMSIGH-2 AGREED TO SEND CABLE.
4. ON SEVEN JULY WIFE OF AMCALL-I RECEIVED LETTER IN OPEN CODE
FROM AMERU-I DATED ONE JULY STATING HER CASE WOULD BE SOLVED
SATISFACTOR IL Y AND TO LET HIM KNOW WHEN REST OF MONEY AVAILABLE.
BINIAR IS TOLD HER TO AGAIN TELL AMECRU-1 MONEY. WOULD. NOT BE RELEASED
UNTIL MONE Y DEPOSITED SWISS ACCOUNT AS STATED IN REF A PARA TWO.
SECRET
---
## Page 3
14-00000
CABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMHATION
PERICIANT NOTITED
• ROMANCE COOT
-CI ASSIFIED MESSAGE
SECRET
(When Filled la)
HEPRODUCTION OF THE EJE
INDEE
D va
CLARITY TO CO FEE MO -
RATE TO ES TIE NO. .
O FRE NO
D RET TO
TOTAL CRIES.
ROUtena
1N::: 119
DIANEM AT
HE TION UNTY
NETION не
Đ+z.
FILE, VR
"PAGE S UNIAMI 8181 SEGRET
COPY OF INCOMING CABLE FROM AMERU-I BEING SENT IN UFAA-2139.
STATION COMMENT: IT POSSIBLE AMERU-! VIEING FOR TIME IN THIS
STRANGE EXCHANGE OF CABLES. NOTHING ELSE KNOWN AT MOMENT HERE. WILL
CABLE ASAP DEVELOPMENTS.
% FILE: 201-B61063, 201-275949, AID 201-325064. GP-1
SECRET
SECRET
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10006-10246.pdf | 104-10006-10246 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 3/11/64 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 201-289248 | NAME CHECK REQUEST - JOSEPH DALLIN | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | OSW12 : V53B : 1996.06.07.10:23:57:690092 : | 1 | ## Page 1
1104-1006-10246|
FROM:
BRANCH
(Requestero name) O
• A-N• BRASHO
ROOM
5R/CI/R
5 - 39
TO
TUBE
ROOM
DATE
RID/INDEX
DT- 5
REQUESTER
RID/FILES
DT- 6
RID/ANALYSIS
GT - 7
RID/201
DW- 6
RID/MIS
GT - 6
RID/INDEX
SURNAME
VE
DALLIN
Joseph
SPELLING VARIATIONS TO BE CHECKED
AKA, ALIASES
• SECRET
BADGE NO.
3H905
EXTENSION
7735
INITIALS
DATE
NAME CHECK AND CONSOLIDATION REQUEST
RID CONTROL NO.
1I MAR 64
CHECKING INSTRUCTIONS
SUBJECT TO BE CHECKED
GIVEN NAMES
OTHER IDENTLEY IOnS. TAc Occupation, 80x.
Le menadeadi
Lectured
to U. 5: Marines
In
the Philippines
Leff USER
CA 1917
SEX
DATE OF BIRTH
PLACE OF OUT 5. 5. 01
CITIZENSHIP
RESIDENCE
RESULTS OF RID/INDEX CHECK
COMMENTS
NO PERTINENT IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION
CARD REFERENCES
ATTACHED
INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUESTERS
IN ALI, CASES
201 CONSOLIDATION
Use gummed label; type or print all
1. Return this form with the card repro-
entries.
ductions, also return pertinent documents,
Upon receipt of index card reproductions aperture cards and the dossier if a 201 or
draw a green diagonal line across the
Items you do not want.
Edit (use green) the reproduced index
cards to indicate:
copy or cross reference
(a) cards to be destroyed (mark with
green D and note reason for destruction) below:
Examples: document destroyed; duplicate
or less informative than retained in-
formation; information of no CS value.
(b) corrections and additions, inclu-
ding infinity symbol oo when card in-
cludes all facts contained in the
document.
(a) • Consolidate into
201-
(b)[ Open 201 file on subject.
RESTRICTION (If any)
ASSIGNEEM
INO
Note 1. Records of COI, SSU, OSS and CIG
OTHER INTERESTED DESKS OR STATIONS
БА REF?
are in RID/ARD, and those that meet
TRID
DESK
indexing criteria in CSHB 70-1-1 are Note 2. Information concerning foreign
carded in the CS Main Index.
If you
public personalities (except
believe there could be additional in-
tary) may be available in BR/OCR
formation of value in these recoras,
x7997.
you must request an Archives Index
search.
DATE
SIGNATURE OF RECORDS OFFICER
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10123-10265.pdf | 104-10123-10265 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 7/1/49 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CHIEF OF STATION( ) | C/FB, CIA | OPERATIONAL, HEDE MASSING. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK44 : F8 : 20040225-1049084 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10123-10265
OFFICIAL DISPATCH
3 0-
cried oy tEr6is
Calafe regslen "es.
FALIAI
SAFI1E
5 201015
goce lisrg
¡rso.
higsi
AaNansy
10N5
$ phs
id sid
: E: €
SE
e ihnts
n3tsg
Bame3
2ạ, 2!.
nilaller
e midittung toas
Ie9E 811e114
17 19-5
E20 214
Se4.e
wgsene
SToni I
aaldoet eig eperate motio
10 10 R:4 0.7.4
#:1.17s
i 1a2s
Na e9et trodue
i ie mtama to tracdke vulrcte
ts soreser
nabturoiraln, Mire
1901 5
Rer2g
180sA
3tes
799621
#84655145. 095151
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10439-10108.pdf | 104-10439-10108 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 12/16/1963 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | RUSS HOLMES WORK FILE | DIRECTOR | WITHHELD | CABLE: ASKED INTERROGATE RIDDERSTRALE 9 DECEMBER | 2 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK-RH04 : F108-III : 20040331-1070083 : | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10439-10108
/ SECRET
TO
: DIRECTOR
FROM
ACTION: C/Wt 4
INFO , DCI, D/DCI, DDP, C/CI, C/Ci
/SI, RI/ AN DUMMY, VR
41a2n
ROUTING
2
5
T: f.710win5 aotion 18
authoriod: DE SENSINZE
Signed:
R.0. #1 - Untt.
c//R+A
Note:
If destruction,
cite
reasons
and
coordinate
eppropriate.
BC 63N8 1715
Document Number
4-08-
for FOIA Review on
MAY 1976
S E
C R
ET 1615257
DIR CITE
14362
RUDIT GPFLCOR
REF DIR 88581*
CLASSIFICATION REVIEW
CONDUCTED ON 5- BAY 15/05
_ IMPDET CL BY 012208
1. ASKED TIPSTATES INTERROGATE RIDDERSTRALE 9 DEC. THEY TIED
UP WEEK 9-13 DEC. 13 DEC THU SAID WOULD CONFER THI AND T/LO DEC
14 OR 16 TO ARPANGE INTERROGATION.
2.
ALBRECHT AGAIN APPEARED EMB 12 DEC. VOLUNTEERED "KEEP EYES
AND
EARS OPEN" FOR MATTERS POSSIBLE INTEREST JACONNETY, IMPLIED
ILE KNEW JACONNETY KUBARK, TRIED SEVERAL PLOYS MAINTAIN CONTACT,
YET SAID HE WANTED NOTHING DO WITH KUBARK, POLITICAL MATTERS,
OR
MILITARY• ALL THIS IN FACE RATHER COLD RECEPTION AND GENERAL
EXPRESSIONS DISINTEPEST. SAID HAD JOINED YOUNG REPUBLICANS NY
TO INTRODUCE NOTE "LIBERALITY" BUT WAS BOUNCED FOR SUGGESTING
201-289248
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED
GROUF
acluded hrom ou
Copy No.
---
## Page 2
13-00000
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE
SECRET
IN 81715 PAGE 2.
7'
NUCLEAR TEST BAN•
8
GPFLOOR MATTERS PERMITTING, REQUEST ODENVY TRACES
ASAP.
See Sanitized File
B
Number
For sterilg. copy of this document.
3. RE LETTER BYY"RYO", TA CHECKED ALL NAMES CHINESE IN EMBASSY
MEDIATELY WITHOUT FINDING LIKELY CANDIDATE. WILL CHECK NAMES ALL
CHINESE SWEDEN AT EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY.
40 INDEX ALBRECHT.
ECRET
231
C/S. Comment:
#Assumer
Ridderstrale.
stu: planned ask its lisison to interrogate.
52 at
SECRET
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32308844.pdf | 124-10296-10172 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 08/30/1958 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | CR 97-3445-26 | DIRECTOR, FBI | SAC, NY | 2 | FBI | HQ | 3/3/18 | 2 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
6/12/201
AGENCY:
RECORD NUMBER :
FBI
124-10296-10172
RECORD SERIES:
HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER: CR 97-3445-26
Document Information
ORIGINATOR:
FROM:
TO :
TITLE :
FBI
SAC, NY
DIRECTOR, FBI
DATE: 08/30/1958
PAGES:
2
SUBJECTS :
JAN, CUBA REBELDE, FINANCES, ASSOC, TRA
DOCUMENT TYPE :
PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS :
4
CURRENT STATUS : Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 04/07/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE
COMMENTS :
v9.1
DocId: 32308844
Page
---
## Page 2
FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-561
FBI.
COT
Date:
8/30/58
Transmit the following in -
AIRTE
(Type in plain text or code)
Via
Ain.
BERLINTS
LXCEPT W
WISE®
MATTON CONTARNNDIAD NO CR
FROM:
SAC, NEW YORK (109-106)
Decleselly on: OADR-L
211,32
070/144901-551
0 BY 5068220/60
11.
0201
TO:
riority or Method of Mailing
SCURRIAT
AND TIR
CESTORS
DINSR 1114-47
DIRECTOR FBI (97-3445)
10 - 21-97 ADVISED B
St 1P 5%1
DATE
No
SUBJECT:
DIRECTORIO OBRERO REVOLUCIONARIO
aka, RA,
IS = CUBA
TABETADO/DIONISIO LIMA PEREZ protect identity,
with whom
insufficient contact hás been had to determine his
reliability, advised sA ROBERI Ad BERMINGHAM, 0/29/50, he ha
learned from
-ROGALLOTHOLES DIrECTOLLO OBRARO REVOL CIONARLO
DOR) leader in New York that the DOR and the CUBANA
REBELDE have 200 men armed and ready to depart for cuba
at moments notice, sLinajuas unable to determine the point
of departure, method of travel or approximate time of
departure other than the fact it could be any day. He
identified ROIG, Dr./ LaGUARDIA, a Negro Dentist who 1s
acting as head of the Cubana Rebelde, and JESUS RODRIGUEZ,
a DOR member,
alf of New York,
• as readers of this planned
pedition,
exa
-xplained that the DOR is not cooperating
with any other revolutionary group other than the Cubana
Rebelde, Inasmuch as the DOR was not invited to the recent
cuban revoluthonary meeting in Caracas, Venezuela.
" He advised that he has heard that the July 26 Movement
has organized an armed expedition of 3000 men in the
states and also expects to land in cuba in the near
He advised that he has also heard that Venezueal is
wide open for cuban revolutionary activity and for the
obtaining of arms.
3-Bureau: (97-3445) (RM).
3-Miami (97-186)
(1-DOR)
9-3.
V
1-cubana Rebelde
I-Jwly 26 Movement
1AD 26
529203445-
SEP
* 1958
'3
109-106 DOR.)
I-New York
I New York
-New York
Approy New York
_M
NAI.
• COT
Mr. Tolson.
Mr. Mohr_
Mr. Nease_
Mr. Parsons.
Mr. Rosen_.
Mr. Tamm.
Mr. Tretter
MTr. W.C.Sallivan
Tele. RooTa.
Mr. Holleran
Miss Gandy.
UNRECORDED COPY FILED IN
N
=1483
DocId: 32308844
Page 2
---
## Page 3
FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-56). 00
FBI
Date:
Transmit the following in
Via
(Type in plain text or code)
(Priority or Method of Mailing)
NY 109-106
JIMA Purther advised that the DOR in Miami
has become disprganized due to a split up between JOSE
CALEMAN ANGEL COFINO anChHIRIGOYEN, but ROlG continues
so have contact with members In Miami and With HIRIGOYEN
JOSE ALEMAN is said to be furnishing money tolthe Cubana
Rebelde In Miami.
FLIMA advised that ROIC stated that he expects LIMA,
to take part in the expedition. ALIMAtagvised that he
intends to back' out at the last minute
office.
INS and customs will be notified locally.
Bureau and interested offices will be kept advised.
FOSTER
- 2-
Approved:
Special Agent in Charge
Sent
STORETT
_M
Per
DocId: 32308844 Page 3
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-10373-10019.pdf | 124-10373-10019 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | 12/20/1977 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 62-117290-TICKLER FOLDER | AG | HSCA | 19 | HSCA | INC FOLDER, LET, MEMO | null | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
4/3/2018
AGENCY: FBI
RECORD NUMBER :
124-10373-10019
RECORD SERIES:
HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER:
62-117290-TICKLER FOLDER
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: HSCA
FROM:
HSCA
TO: AG
TITLE:
DATE: 12/20/1977
PAGES:
19
SUBJECTS :
12/20/77 REQUEST H. L. LEE, R. D. RACKLEFF, ETAL
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS:
CURRENT STATUS:
DATE OF LAST REVIEW :
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE
COMMENTS:
INC FOLDER, LET, MEMO
v9.1
---
## Page 2
Date : 03/27/99
Page
JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY
:
FBI
RECORD
NUMBER :
124-10373-10019
RECORDS SERIES
HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER
62-117290-TICKLER FOLDER
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR
: HSCA
FROM
HSCA
TO
AG
TITLE :
DATE: 12/20/77
PAGES : 19
SUBJECTS : 12/20/77 REQUEST H. L. LEE, R. D. RACKLEFE, ETAL
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/27/99
OPENING CRITERIA : INDEFINITE
COMMENTS : INC FOLDER, LET, MEMO
---
## Page 3
1 - Legal Counsel Division
(Attn: Mr. Coulson,
2- Mr. G. J.
Foster
J.
T. Aldhizer
1 - Mr.
February int, 1978
Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division
Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Director, FBI
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE UN ASSASSINATIONS
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA)
Reference is made to letter to the Attorney General
Irom G. Robert blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, HSCA, dated
December 16, 1977, requesting access to material in the files of
the FEI pertinent to the John F. Kennedy assassination investiga-
tion. Additionally, reference is made to letter to the Attorney
General from the Director, Fbl, dated February 3, 1978, which
responded in part to this request.
Enclosed are an original and two copies of a memorandum
which responds to the above request and advises that the material
is available for HSCA access at F BI Headquarters.
Enclosures - 3
62-117290
JSG: cfb
(7)
NOTE: The HSCA has requested access to 17 enumerated items
relative to the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Our
response of 2/3/78. advised that material regarding four anti-Castro
groups has been prepared for HSCA access. This response advises
that the remainder of the material has been compiled and is available
for HSCA access, subject to the usual excisions and deletions. Where
Information is not provided, it is either not retrievable from Head-
quarters files or is not being produced pursuant to the Memorandum.
of Understanding.
Additionally, this respond to the HSCA's letter of 12/20/77 requesting
that retired Assistant Director, Alex Rosen, be made available for
interview. This has been coordinated win Legal Counsel Division,
---
## Page 4
1 - Legal Counsel Division
(Attn: D. O. Coulson)
P- Mr. G. j. Foster
. - Mr. J.
T. Aldhizer
1 - Mr. J. S. Giaquinto
February 14, 1978
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
U. 8. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA)
Reference is made to letter to the Attorney General
from G. Robert Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, HSCA, dated
December 16, 1977, requesting access to material in the flles of the
FBI pertinent to the John F. Kennedy assassination Investigation.
Additionally, refereace is made to letter to the Attorney General
from the Director, FBI, dated February 3, 1978, which responded
in part to this request.
Retrievable information in FBI Headquarters files regard-
ing the 13 named Individuals in referenced request has been prepared
for the Committee's access, subject to the usual excisions and dele-
tions. Where Information is not provided, it is elther not retrievable
from Headquarters files or la not being produced pursuant to the
Memorandum of Understanding.
It is noted that the requested matertal regarding the four
anti-Castro groups was responded to in our referenced letter of
February 3, 1918.
This serves as written confirmation of a conversation of
January 6, 1978, between Mr. A. Purdy of the HSCA and Special
Agent Drew Clark, wherein Mr. Purdy was advised that retired
Special Agent James W. Anderton was avallable for interview by
the Committee.
Additionally, by letter dated December 20, 1977, the HSCA
requested retired Assistant Director Alex Rosen be made avall-
able for Intervlew. Rosen has been cleared from his employment
agreement and is avallable for interview as needed by the ESCA,
Arrangementa for Interview can be made through contact with
62-117290
SEE NOTE PAGE 2
JSG:cib
(8)
---
## Page 5
House Select Committee on Assassinations
U. 8. House of Representatives (H8CA)
representatives of the Legal Liaison and Congressional Affairs
Unit and the Congressional Inquiry Unit, FBl Beadquarters. By
FBI memorandum dated February &, 1978, the HSCA was advised
that other Agents named in the letter of December 20, L977, have
been similarly cleared and are avallable for HSCA Interview.
ORIGINAL AND TWO SENT TO
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL,
CRIMINAL DIVISION, ATTENTION:
MR. ROBERT L. KEUCH
NOTE: See Director, FBI, letter to Assistant Attorney Caneral,
Criminal Division, Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch,
dated 2/14/78, captioned as above.
---
## Page 6
1- Legal Cou CO DiVision
Mr. G. J. Foster
February 8, 1978
Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division
Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Director, FBI
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA)
Reference is made to letters to the Attorney General
from G. Robert Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, HSCA, dated
December 20, 1977, January 5, 1978, January 19, 1978, and
January 20, 1978, which, in connection with the HSCA's
investigation
into the assassination or
i Martin Luther King, Jr., requested that
several Agents of the FBI be made available for interview by the
HSCA.
Reference is also made to letter to the Attorney General
from Mr. Blakey, dated January 17, 1978, which, in connection with
the HSCA's investigation into the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy, requested that former Special Agent Ivor Ellis Nitschke be
made avallable for interview by the ESCA.
Enclosed are an original and one copy of a memorandum
in response to the above requests. It is requested that you furnish a
copy of the enclosed memorandum to the HSCA.
Enclosures - 2
62-117290
JTA :1fj
(5)
NOTE:
By memorandum dated 2/1/78, the current offices of
assignment and/or last known addresses of Agents and
former Agents, except Ahearn and Sheets, listed in the five HSCA
letters were set forth and approval was obtained to clear them from
their employment agreements and to contact them regarding inter-
view by HSCA. Ahearn and Sheets were previously cleared by memo-
randum dated 10/25/77.
NOTE CONTINUED PAGE 2
---
## Page 7
Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division
Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
NOTE CONTINUED:
Arrangements for these interviews are handled informally
by representatives of the Legal Liaison and Congressional Affairs
Unit and the Congressional Inquiry Unit of FBI Headquarters.
This letter and memorandum completes our response to
all five above-mentioned requests of the HSCA.
- 2 -
---
## Page 8
1 - Legal Counsel Division
(Attn: Mr. Coulson)
- Mr. G. J. Foster
February 8, 1978
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA)
Reference Is made to letters to the Attorney General
from G. Robert Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, HSCA, dated
December 20, 1977, January 5, 1978, January 19, 1978, and
January 20, 1978, which, in connection with the HSCA's investigation
Into the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., requested that
several Agents of the FBI be made avallable for interview by the
HSCA.
Reference is also made to letter to the Attorney General
from Mr. Blakey, dated January 17, 1978, which, in connection with
the HSCA's investigation into the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy, requested that former Special Agent Ivor Ellis Nitschke be
made avallable for intervlew by the ESCA.
This memorandum is to confirm that Agents and former
Agents of the FBI, listed in the above HSCA letters, have been cleared
from their employment agreements and are avallable for interview as
needed by the HSCA. Arrangements for interview can be made through
contact with representatives of the Legal Liaison and Congressional
Affairs Unit and the Congressional Inquiry Unit of FBI Headquarters.
62-117290
ORIGINAL AN ON, ENTERTON: MAN PORTONE. GENERAL,
JTA :1fj
(5)
NOTE: See leiter to sistant At me earal, Gim a piviela
---
## Page 9
LOUIS STOKES, OHIO, CHAIRMAN
RICHARDSON PREYER, N.C.
SAMUEL L
INE, OHIO
WALTER E. FAUNTROY, D.C.
DIANANY
KINNEY, CONN.
YVONNE BHATHIVAITE DURKE, CALIF.
CHARLE'S TradE, NEBR.
CHPISTOPHER J, DODD, CONN.
MAROLD S. SAWYER, MICH.
MAROLD C. FORD, TENN.
FLOYD J. FITHIAN, IND.
ROBERT W. EDGAR, PA.
(202) 223-4624
deshagen
Select Committee on Assassinations
U.S. House of Representatibes
3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515
January 5, 1978
far 10 240 fm 1928
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20530
Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2113
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
In connection with the investigation by this Committee
into the death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., it is re-
quested that the F.B.I. make available for interview, on a
priority basis, the following agents:
1. Theodore A 'Hearn - LoS Angeles
2. Leroy W. Sheets - Los Angeles / 10/ 467 cla
Thomas J. Wilson - Atlanta
4. Gerald Galbreath - El Paso
The Committee is ready to interview these agents on an
immediate basis.
Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly
appreciated.
Sincerely,
G. Robert Blakey
Chief. Counsel and Director
CC: Danny O. Coulson
GRB: wwd
---
## Page 10
LOUIS STOKES, ONIO, CHAIRMAN
RICHAROSON PREYER, N.C.
AMUEL L. DEVINE, OMI
WALTER E. FAUYTROY, D.C.
STEWAR
ANEY, CON
YVONNE BRATHWAITE BURKE, CALIP.
CHARLES
CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, CONN.
MAROLD E. FORD, TENN.
FLOYD J, PITHIAN, IND.
ROBERT W. KOGAR, PA.
Rec.
(202) 225-4824
Select Committee on Assassinations
U.S. House of Representatives
3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515
January 19, 1978
Jan: 24.3:448M1978
2:15pm
1/25/5
Althoge
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20530
Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2113
Dear Mr, Attorney General:
In connection with the investigation by this Committee
into the death of Dr. Martin Luther King, JI., it is re-
quested that the Federal Bureau of Investigation make avail-
able for interview Special Agent Cole Geary of the Birming-
ham Field Office.
It is requested that arrangements for
such an interview be made within the next two weeks.
Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly
appreciated.
Respectfully,
1. Nobes Blokay
G.
Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
GRB: med
CC:
Danny 0. Coulson
---
## Page 11
1 LOUIS STOKES, ONIO, CHAIRMAN
RICHARDSON PREYER, N.C.
SAMUEL L. DEVINE, OHIO
WALTER E: FAUNTROY, D.C.
STEWART B. MC KINNEY, CONN
YVONNE BRATHWASTE BURKE, CALIF.
CHARLES THO
ABA.
CHRISTOPHER J, DOJO, CONN.
MAROLD 5. S
MICH.
MAROLD E. FORD, TENN.
FLOYD J. PITHIAN, IND.
ROBERT W. KOGAR, PA.
(202) 225-4624
Received Office y
Conguscional Affai
Jari: 24 12:31 PM 1978
Select Committee on Ass.
Sinations
U.5. House of Representatives
3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING. ANNEX 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515
JAN 2 0 1978
Kee.
CiU
2:15Pmm
1/25/8
Alchagen
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C. 20530
Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2113
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
In connection with the investigation by this
Committee into the death of DI. Martin Luther King,
Jr., it is requested that the FBI make available for
interviews, the following agents:
Richard S. Clark
Dennis LeMaster
Russell Jean Gray, Jr.
Douglas G. Bills
The Committee is ready to interview these agents
on priority basis, therefore your prompt attention to
this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
2. Nott Blaby
G. Robert Blakey•
Chief Counsel and Director
GRB: ghj
CC :
Mr. Danny O. Coulson
---
## Page 12
1. н.с.
nor. D.c
DOOO, COMA
AR, PA.
(702) 225-16
Kind offu
Select Committee on Assassinations
E.S5. Ibouse of Bepresentatibes
3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515
January 17, 1978
Уідин
Jon.
18 2.28 P
1978
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20530
Attention:
Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2113
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
In connection with its investigation into the circum-
stances surrounding the death of President Kennedy, the Select
Committee on Assassinations would like to interview former
P.B.I. agent I. E. Nitschke. The Committee, therefore, re-
quests that the F.B.I. advise the Committee of Mr. Nitschke's
last known location and that the F.B.I. release Mr. Nitschke
from his employment agreement.
The Committee is in possession of the following identi-
fying information with respect to Mr. Nitschke:
Name: I. E. Nitschke
Last Known Address:
559 Focis Street
Metairie, Louisiana
Last Known Employment: Chief of Security
NASA Installation.
Michoud, Louisiana
F.B.I. Service: Prior to 1961; believed to have been
assigned to Butte, Montana prior to
1955.
Known Associates: Guy Bannister
If at aif
possible, the Committee would like to have
this information and the appropriate employment agreement
waiver by January 23, 1978.
---
## Page 13
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
January 17, 1978
Page 2
This letter confirms the oral request made by Ms. Hess
on December 16, 1978.
Thank you for your continuing cooperation.
Respectfully,
22. Nobes Slalong
G.
Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
GRB: Jhd
Cc: Danny 0. Coulson
---
## Page 14
The Director
2/14/78
-Mr. H. N. Bassett
Mr. G. J. Foster
1
- Mr. Mintz
2 - Mr -
Hotis
Legal Counsel
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON ASSASSINATIONS (HSCA)
PURPOSE:
To request the release of former Assistant Director
Alex Rosen from his employment agreement in order that he may
be interviewed by captioned Committee.
DETAILS:
To date, staff attorneys of the RSCA have conducted
a number of interviews of Special Agents and former Special
in connection with the Cormittee's investigation into
the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther
King, Jr.
The HSCA requested that former Assistant Director
Rosen be interviewed.
Through records of the Admin-
istrative Services Division it has been determined that Rosen
resides at 55 Fir Hill Towers, North, Akron, Ohio.
If approved, Rosen will be telephonically advised
by the Legal Liaison and Congressional Affairs Unit, Legal
Counsel Division, and the Congressional Inquiry Unit, Records
Management Division, of the interest of the Cormittee and,
prior to interview, a Legal Counsel representative will provide
Rosen with
interview.
a briefing as to the scope and limitations of the
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Director release former Assistant Director
Rosen
from his
employment agreement to be interviewed by
staff
personnel of captioned Committee.
1 - Personnel file
Alex Rosen
DOC/JTA:1fj/ldr
(7)
---
## Page 15
The Associate Director
Legal Counsel
2/1/78
1 - /ir.
Bassett
I7-
7r.
Foster
1
- 2r. Nintz
2 - ir. Hotis
HOUSE BRINCT CONNINTED ON
ASSASSINATIONS (ROCA)
PURPOSE: The purpose of this memorandun is to request the
release of certain Special Agents from their employment
agreement in order that they may be interviewed by captioned
Committee.
DETAILS: To date, staif attorneys of the HiSCA have conducted
a number of interviews of Special Agents anu former Special Agents
in connection with the Committee's Investigation into the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther
KInS. Jr.
Additional requests for agent interviews have been
subritted by letters to the Attorney General from G. Robert
Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, ESCA. These agents, their
offices of assignment or last known address, the date of
interview request and the case involved are as follows:
Agent
Office of Assignment
or.
Last Known
Address
Date of
Request
12/20/77
Case
Involved
King
3
Marry L. Lee
(Former)
Richard D. Rackleft Atlanta Office
James R. Riordan
niew Haven Office
Thomas J. Wilson
Cleveland Office
DOC/JTA/533
(17)
CONTINUED - CV22
1 . Personnel
file of Kerry L. Ice
1. Personnel
file of Richard D. Rackleft
1
• Personnel
file of James N. Plorrian
]
Personnel
file
of thomas J. Wilson
1
Personnel
file of Gerald D. Caloreatn
1
Personnel
ille of Coloman D. Geary IIT
Personnel
f.le
of Iver niiis hitschke
]
1
Personnel
file of Nichard S. Clark:
Personnel
11le of Dennis C. Levaster
• Personnel
file of Ruanell Joan Gray. Jr.
1
Personnel file of Douclas G. Bills
12/20/77
King
12/20/77 King
1/5/78
Kins
---
## Page 16
3
Tenorandm. 80 The associaos Director
ne :
:000
Acent
Uffice of Assimment
or west Anoin Acoress
Geraid C. Galoreatn
Houston
Office
Colchan D. Geary III Birminchar Office
Ivor Silis witschke Travel Loûge Lotel
(Former)
Anarillo,
Texas
(1971)
Richard S. Plan:
Legat: Loncon
Dennis C. Levaster
(Former)
Russell Jean Gray: Jr.
FOREO
Douglas G. Bills
(Former)
Date of
request
1/5/70
1/19/76
1/19/75
Case
Involved
King
King
Kennedy
1/20/78
1/20/78
Kins
KinG
1/20/70
1/20/78
King
King
I approved, tue above agents will be telephonically
advised or che
Legal Liaison and Congressional Afrairs Unit:
ical Coucel Division; anu Congressional Inquiry Unit, Records
management division, of
the interest of the Committee
and, prior
to intervier:
counsel representatives will provide these
agents wies o uriefing as to the scope and limitations of the
intervious.
P20124D492038: (1) That the Director release the Special Agents
hamed in the attached lotter fron their employment agreement to
be intervieved by staff personnel of captioned Committee.
---
## Page 17
Viemorandum to The Associate Director
ISCA
(2) That the legal Counsel Division make appropriate
notification
to current employees regarding this matter.
Management
(3) That the Congressional Inquiry Unit, Records
Division, make appropriate notification
to former
employees regaraing
tnis matter.
---
## Page 18
LOUIS STOKES, ONIO, CHAIRMAI
RICHARDSON PREYER, N.C
WALTEH E. FAUNTROY, D.C.
YVONER ANATMNNITE BURKE. CALIF
CHRISTOPHER J. DOOD, CONN.
HAROLD E. FOND. TEAN.
STEWART B. MORNINEY: COIN
CHARLES THONE, INIRAL
MARGLOOMY CENSONAL Select Committee on Assassinations
AFFAIRS
(202) 225-4620ec 21 9.19 AM 1977
U.S. Mouse of Representatibes
3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2
original to file. WASHINGTON. D.C, 20515
COPY
ĐSC 2. 0 1977
dethings
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C.
20530
Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2113
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
In connection with the investigation by this Committee
into the death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., it is requested
that the FBI make available for interview the
following agents
who were assigned to the Atlanta field office in 1968:
Harry L. Lee
Richard D. Rackleff
33. James R. Riordan
In addition, the staff requests your assistance in arrang-
ing the availability for interview of Al Rosen, formerly
Assistant Director of the FBI under the late J. Edgar Hoover.
We understand that Mr. Rosen has recently retired.
Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly
appreciated.
Very truly yours,
22. Nobes Blahe
G. Robert. Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
GRB : mek
CC:
Danny 0. Coulson
---
## Page 19
LOUIS STOKES, DINO, CHAIRNIAN
A:0HA/u0:N PRETEN, N.C.
SAM:: L. I.
MALTEP T
TOP. A HATE DJOKE. CALIE
PIRULO L. 201S.
1,0m TS
HARE CUMYRESBIONAL
AFFAIRS
Sclect Committer on Ascassinations
(232) 225028E6 21 9 1970.1977
We. Mouse of BiopecSentatives
3331 HOUSE OFFICE FUILDING. ANNEX 2
WASHINSTON, D.C. 20515
ĐSG 20 277
Alchezer
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States.
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C. 20530
Attention: Mi. Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2113
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
In connection with the investigation by this Committee
into the death of Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr., it is requestea
that the FBI make available for interview the
who were assigned to the Atlanta
following agents
field office in 1968:
1. Harry I. Lee
2. Richard D. Rackleff
3.. James R. Riordan
In addition, the staff requests your assistance in arrang-
ing the availability for interview of Al Rosen, formerly
Assistant Director of the FBI under the late J. Edgar Hoover.
We understand
that Mr. Rosen has recently retired.
Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly
appreciated.
Very truly Yours,
12. Notes Blahng
G. Robert. Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
GRB :nek
ec: Danny O. Coulson
--- |
||||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10071-10151.pdf | 104-10071-10151 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 1/4/67 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | JMWAVE | CABLE: ARREST, KEY WEST OF MASFERRER, GEORGES. | 3 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK15 : F13 : 1993.07.30.17:58:29:680059 : | 3 | ## Page 1
104-10071-10151₴
SECRET CARLITE GITE DUVAVE 15G
NO NIOCT
16-8
DYVIR PORTE
:203
3P
SUPPLENaNTS PEF INFO.
ARRESTED AND HELD
CY MOST HOT? SOCIG RECOONIZANCE
01=704.
ERECFAT VER BAPTISTI
ROBERT, (CULONEL RENE
AGraS, in Florida
MARTIN FO CASEY. SOLAUSE FIND
"HELD UNDER $S9R? SURETY
for attesptal
BONS. TRY OTUERS KELD UNDER SOSHAGON, HELD AI DODE COUNTY
invasion of
JAIL MIANO INDER
559A SUDDeNTENCE BOND WAS ANTONIO MONAS.
Haiti d
"FIFTY DADE MELA DE RECOGNIZANCE BOND OF SERG. STAIRE EO
BE AYERICALS MERE BARMAN AND DACT GLY AILEY WEST AND
EDALAFLACINE KILD OT MIAMI.
MEATINE CEROPE LOGO CUMNISSIONET CONNENC & JANUARNARgIES
HAS ACID CONTINUANCE. NO DEN DATE TO MFAUDS HAS STAIED
ME PLAS PROSSCITE SAUF FOR VIOLATION OF MINITIONS CONTROL
• ACTO MAXIMIN PEWALTY TYO YEARS II
6iO 539,202 FINE.
SECRET
over?
4 form 67
308-9-1k
8645
UME
GARD
REPRODUCTIO
---
## Page 2
14-00000
PAGE E INADAPON SECRET SLE
TOR PAROLE A SATING FRON LXTORATTON ACTION PH ST
AGAINST NIT..
S. SIZEABLE STOCK OF VEAPONS AND MUNITIONS SUFISCATED
BY GUSTOLE ON BOARD - "DON AiD IN HOUSE, INCLUDED WERE iZ
HORTARS 69 MN AÜD 8I NM, 2 POCKET LALICHERS 3.5 INCH, 7.
MACHINE GUNS SO CALIBER, 7 MACHINE GUNS 39 CALIBER, & BREN
SO 1A SUARACHINE GUNS, ABOUT 140 RIFLES AND CARBINES,
OVER
STU BAYDiCIS AND KNIVES, 18 PISTOLS, ONE WALKIE TALKI:,
1 EMPTY 179 LB. 3013 CASING AND 1 EMPTY SO LB. BOMB CASING,
& OUTSOARD MOTORS, I SHALL AND I LARCE RUBBER BOAT, MISCEL -
LANED!IS MES EQUIPMENT AND ACCRSSOFIES FOR WIAPONS, OVER
197,737 ROHINDS AlTO. ALSO SEIZED WERE S7 BUICK SKYLARK VIT
GEN JERSEY PLATES.
66 FALCON WITH FLORIDA PLATES, TVO AND ONE
HALF TON TRUCK GUC HITH NEW SEASEY PEADOSROTOR VESSEL
CLON 916 CITED JHAVE 4218 HAS SRIZED AT BERTH IN MIAMI.
PES POUNDS OF COA EXPLOSIVE MUSCUE ITS MEDANS.
: 4.
TRICULOAD OF EXPLOSIVIE SIR"D EY MODE COUNTY
SHERIFF OU 31 DECENDER 66 P: THIC: "ITH FLAT TIRE CHEC:ES
---
## Page 3
14-0000g
PAGE S UNNAVE 4987 SEC!:I SACHET
ON HISHUAY, EXPLOSIVES SELDIDEO TO MASFERRER GROUP, "EXC
DEINS • TRANSPORIED TO FLORIDA YEYS FOR DISTRIBUTION®
SO AMTASSADORS MAY BE BHIEFED DE INFO PARAS I THRU 4.
6. NOFACT INFO ONLY, STATIO: CHECHING SEPIAL WUMBERS
OF VARIO'IS MEAPONS SEIZED. OUTAJAR) "OTORS CITED PARA S MERE
OF SILENT TYPE LISED EXTENSIVTLY ! OF CT SINCE SI. MANY
LOST ON OPERATIDS INCLIDIUS BAY OF PIGS. SERIAL MBERS
S-21 AND S-IS ARE MEANINGLISS TO CUTTIT MAVE STATION.
APPEARS LARGE BUTSER POOT 15 79-1 93 39-9.9 TYPE USSO 3Y
JAWAVE. IOWEVER MANY OF TIGE ALSO LUST IN VARIOUS INDER-
TAKINTS iI C' SI, STATION ALTO TACIT ALL PERSONS
ARRESTED. WILL ADVISE ANY TICUIFICAT SILIS.
SE C PET
BT
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10074-10167.pdf | 104-10074-10167 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 9/11/74 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | PLANNING OF COUP AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT OF THE BAHAMAS | 6 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK16 : F62 : 1993.07.17.09:53:13:370480 : ATTACHMENTS MIM-00-A-(S)-3227 | 6 | ## Page 1
1104-0074-0167)
OFFICE
RATE OPENE!
DATE CLOSED
CONFIDENTIAL
(then filled In)
DCD CASE CHRONICLE
ACTIVATION AND CLOSURE
DATE OPENED
-Sun
dATE CLOSED
Cano d 11901
DETROIT
OFFICE
MPLS
PHIL
PITT
OFFICE
LOUIS
DATE CLOSED
iS THACUSE
WASH
GENERAL CLOSURE
INITIATOR
REQUIREMENTS
NUMBER (If Any)
NUMBER (TY any)
HUN 2,6S
Раму Виче
3,54402
X:4489
X3128 (bin)
MONTHLY REVIEW
REMARKS
Closed- 5 Feb 14
0970'
---
## Page 2
14-00000
: Planning of Coup Against the Government of the Bahamas
DOMESTIC COLLECTION DIVISION
upport Branch/Operational Support Section
-per 900, Ker Buezdine - oxe. 2308
Case 61401
11 September 1974
03
WH/7/CAR
• ATTN:
3 B 0001 Hos.
03
Attached for your information
is a copy of MIM-00-A(S)-322/
26415-74.
E-2 IMPDET CL BY 007622
0910
---
## Page 3
00000-tL
CONFIDENTIAL
(when filled in)
DE SERTE
NUMBER
10/87 1819|20
22 23 24 25 20
169409
Planning of Coup Against the Government of the Bahamas
INDINDUAL NO
Joseph Merola
Gordon: Cooper and Associates
Opa-Locka, Florida
IGANIZATION NO:
SOURCE (Nome. Title, Organizotion, Address)
INDIVIQUAL NOS
- Same as above
OAEANIGAUION NO
27 28 20 80 31 3233
40/41 42|
PROCESSING
8. COMBINED WITH
ORGANIZATION NO.
REQUESTED FROM
COLLZGTION
INTERVIEW
TRIP REPORT
OTHER DOCUMENT
SUp
50V
DIRECTED TO
OTHER (specity below)
CASE OFFICER
SPRyan
FiELD COMMENTS
A) Re Watts/Bem telecon, 10 September
1974.
3) The meeting took place the morning
of 7 September 1974 in Miami.
Joe Merola
telephoned Matt MacVane at his home on
7 September 1974 to pass on
this informa-
tion. The telecon was unsolicited by
MacVane,
who no longer contacts
Merola
per DCD Headquarters Instructions.
Com
Robinson flew In from Nassau to meet with
Joe Merola and Mike Yamanis (Yamants 1s
apparently from Ft. Lauderdale and 11ke
Merola he has close ties to arns dealers
and mercenarles).
Robinson plans to meet
again with Merola and Yamanis
after com-
plete financial details have been worked
out in Hassau.
Filed:
101900Z
03
TGAOUUARTEHS COMMENTS
Process sheet and report typed in
OSS.
(MIAMI TWX 12584)
Manios
0001
CASE OFFICER
VIMAGINOS
°3
/. RY 007822
EX-Z IMP. DET.
DIVISION/STAFF. DE
097°
3
---
## Page 4
14-00000
CLASSIFICATION
CONFIDENTIAL
DIRECTORATE OF
EPEHATONS
COUNTRY
SUBJECT
Bahamas
Planning of Coup Against the
Government of the
Bahamas
REPORT NO.
0O-A(S)•322/26415-74
DATE 11 September 1974
NO. PAGES
REFERENCES
Case 61401
DOMESTIC COLLECTION DIVISION
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION REPORT
This report is believed to contain information of operational interest and may not be disclosed to
personnel
the Directorate of Operations without the prior permission of the Domestic Collection Division.
SOURCE
U.S. citizen,
convicted arms dealer who maintains close ties
to known underworld figures.
1:
Com (Robinson), a black Bahamian who resides in Nassau, Bahamas,
recently has made foreign enquiries into the possibility of hiring
armed mercenaries
to be used in
an attempt to overthrow the
Government of Prime Minister Lyndon 0. (Pindling).
During
a meeting with non-Bahamians, who have close ties with foreign
arms dealers, that took place outside of the Bahamas Robinson
stated that he represents elements of the Bay Street merchants
of Nassau, and that funds are available for action against the
Bahaman
Government.
According
to Robinson, his group is looking
equipping, and execution
a coup against the Government.
who are in sympathy with his planned course of action, and that
after full details are worked out and the required funds are set
aside, he will
convene another meeting with the foreigners in order
to finalize the appropriate arrangements.
09703
---
## Page 5
14-00000
CUNFIULWNM
DUNFID BEN TRIAL IBISPER SEP TA LITEL
CITE DRO/MIANT 12584
PETORITY DOD /WASHINGTON
ATTRA SUPPORT BRANCHLOSS (UATTS/RYAN)
INTEL REPORT
SOURCES JOSEPH SEROLA, GORDON COOPER AND ASSOCIATES, OPA-LOCKA,
FLORIDA:
FILED A
10190r2
REPOPT CLASS CONFIDENTIAL
COUVTRY
SAHAMAS
SAKAYAS
FIELD NO. XMIY DOA6S 322/26415574
PLANNING OF COUP ABAINST THE COVTRNMENT
OF THE
1.?.
CITIZZY,
CONVICTEC DAMS DEALER UHO MAINTAINS CLOSE TIES
KWYN
'DERWORLD FIGURES.
30'
RECENTLY NAS
HOTLY MAY MAT AGREE MENSHES ESTO TA OSSET
FOREIGN FINITRIES INTO THE POSSIBILITY
ARMED VERCEMARIES TO
ATTEMPT TO OVERTHIAW
TA GO HEYT
OF PRITE MINISTER LYSDOM O.
"SETING
(PINDLING)..
DIRITS
WITH NON-SAHANIS,
n?49
THAT
PLACE
HAVE CLOSE TIES WITH FOREIG'
DEALERO, THAT TOOY
CUT SIDE
T NE.
RAidAlAS ROBINSON
HE PEERCSEITS
FLEMENTE 25 THE BOY STREET YERCHANT?
MASSAU,
AND
THAT
FUNDS ARE
AVAILAPLE
FOR
ACTIO: AGAINIT
FANAVIAY GOVERNMENT.
DORINSON, HIS GRO!P
IF LOOKING
FOR
FOREIGN ASSISTA ICE IN THE PLAWIG,
EXECUTION OF
COMP AGAINST
ThE GOVERNMENT.
HE CHIP THAT
THER"
AFE
MANY BAHAMIANS WHO
ARE IN SYMPATHY WITH MIS PLANNED
1952 OF
ACT10%,
AiD
THeT
AFIO? FILL RETAILS
ARE WORKED OUT
THE
REQUIRED
FINDS ARE
SET
HE
WILL
WITH
THE
FORELJNERS
ARRANGEMENTS.
CODE TO TYIAL CO THE
CONVENF. ANOTHER
END OF REPORT
1÷74.
FIELD COMMENTSE
17)
MEETING
1971
(A)
TOOM.
RE WATTS/DEM TELECOND IN SEPTEMUTY
PLACE THE
MORNING
JOE
MEROLA TELEPHOVSD
MATT
SPTINBEE 1974 ТО РАЗЕ ON ТИIТ
"O%
POLICITED DY
NO LOCAR
CONTACTS
MF 10L4
PER DOU HEADQUANTERS IN TRUCTIONI
NGRY NGON
FLEW IN
FROM NA!! TO MEET KITH JOE MEROLA
LIK
AYATANIS
APPARSATLY F309 FT, LA DERDaLE
NTROLA
HAG
CLOSE
TES TO ARMS DCALLAS AND
pain Nood
TO MEET AGAIN WITH CROLA
514n
LICIAL DETAILS NAVE ASEN
0990"
---
## Page 6
14-00000
1.
BAYAYS, RECENTLY
COR CORLESENT LA CARE SAMANTA QUO RESIDES,
IN HA550
oF
POSSINTLITY
HIRING ARMEO MENCENARIES TO
BE !SED
IN.
AN
THE GOVERNMENT OF PRIME MINISTER LYNDON
ATTEN TOL
OVERTHROW
(PINDLING) .:
DERING
MEETING WITH NON-SAHAMIANS,
VIIO HAVE CLOSE TIES
WITH FOREIGN
ARMS DEALERS THAT TOOK PLACE
OUTSIDE OF THE
BAHAMAS
ROBINSON
STATED THAT HE REPRESEHTS ELEMENTS OF THE BAY STREET MERCHANTS
OF NASSAUS
AND
THAT
FUNDS ARE
AVAILABLE FOR ACTION AGAINST
THE
BANANAN SOVERNMENT
ACCORDING TO POBINSON, HIS
13
GRO!P
LOOKING FOR FORETON ASSISTANCE IN TUE PLANNING BALBRYNA
AND-EXECUTION:OF AP COUP AGAINST THE
GOVERNMENT
SAID THAT
THERE ARE MANY RAKAMIANS UHC
ARE IN SYMPATH! WITH KIS PLANNED
COURSE OF ACTION,
AND THAT AFTER FULL DETAILS ARE WORKED
OuT
ANTING SECURE FORCE NERS IN ORDER TO VALIZE THE NEE
VITH THE FOREIGNERS IN ORDER
AIRPROFRIATE ARRANGEMENTS.
•END OF REPORT
218
FIELD COMNENTS'!
1974-
(A).
RE WATTS/SEN TELECON, 19 SEPTEMBER
B)S THE MEETING TOOK PLACE THE MORNING
OF 7 SEPTEMBER 1974F IN MIAMI®
JOE MEROLA TELEPHONED MATT
MA VANE AT HIS HOMEON 7, SEPTEMBER 1974: TO PASS 0M THIS
INFORMATION.
THE TELECON WAS UNSOLICITED BY
HACVARE"
*HO
NOP LONGER CONTACTS MEROLA PER DOD
HEADOUARTERS INSTRUCTIONS
COM ROBINSON FLEW IN FROM NASSA!! TO MEET
wITH
AND
MIKE
MAMANIS YAMANIS IS APPARENTLY FROM
TO LAIDERD
• LAUDERDALE
AND LIKE FEROLA HE
HAS CLOSE TIES TO ARUS DEALERS AND
MERCENARIEST. POSINSON. PLANS TO MEET
AGAIN WITH YEROLA
AND
*YAMANIS AFTER COMPLETE FINANCIAL DETAILS HAVE BEEN
WORKED OUT IN NASSAU•
A 13
PREPARE
TYPLE COPY
"HAT
F? IMPDET
09704
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32287857.pdf | 124-10198-10133 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 11/21/1966 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 92-3171-1907 | DIRECTOR, FBI | ROEMER, WILLIAM F. JR. | 14 | FBI | HQ | 3/7/18 | 14 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Date:
5/7/2015
Agency Information
AGENCY:
FBI
RECORD NUMBER:
124-10198-10133
RECORD SERIES:
HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
92-3171-1907
Document Information
ORIGINATOR:
FBI
FROM: ROEMER, WILLIAM F. JR.
TO :
DIRECTOR, FBI
TITLE :
DATE :
'PAGES:
SUBJECTS :
11/21/1966
14
SGI, ACT, ASSOC, OC, NEG
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS :
4.
CURRENT STATUS:
Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW:
04/03/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE
COMMENTS:
v9.1
DocId: 32287857
Page 1
166
---
## Page 2
FD-9a3 (Fier. 5-1-511
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
E
REPORTING OFFICE
CHICAGO
TITLE OF CASE
OFFICE OF ORIGIN
CHICAGO
SAMUEL M. GIANCANA, aka
DATE
11/21/66
REPORT MADE BY
WILLIAM F. ROEMER,
CHARACTER OF CASE
INVESTIGATIVE PERIOD
9/20 - 11/15/66
JR
..AR
•I TYPED BY
REFERENCE: Report of SA WILLIAM F. ROEMER, JR., dated 9/27/66
at Chicago. !d
,25
ENCLOSURES
TO BUREAU (2)
characterization of peormant letterhead membe al
iwo (2) copies of a letterhead memorandum setting
characterization of informants utilized in instant report. J
- 11-82
forth
LEAD
6353 VeT/AG
CHICAGO
AT CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
Will continue to
1121-86
ollow and
report the activities
Of GIANCANA /
Fending over one year - yes; pending prosecution over 6 months - no.
SPECIAL AGEN
APPROVED
COPIES MADE:
3, - Burea
X v4
N CHARGE
DO NOT WRITE IN SPACES BELOW
(92-3171) (Ener
92-3171
(907.2028
1 - USA,
Chicago
11 NOV 25 1966
2 - Chicago (92-349)
le/asification
9/301
26 140
Dissemination Record of Attached Ribpor
Notations
Agency
CG.
-AAGI
Criminal Division,
Request Recd.
Date Fwd.
How Fwd.
Ormonized. Crime
and Racketeering
Section,
Room 2524.
CLASSTI
BY
EXE. PIFF
GOS, CATEGORY
I TE OF DECLASSIFICATION INDEFINITE 940*
DocId: 32287857 Page 2
---
## Page 3
CG
92-349
INFORMANTS
Source
MARY KAY MC ALLISTER
1151 South Wisconsin, Oak
Park, Illinois
CG T-2
CG 7016-PC
CG T-3'
FIORE BUCCIERI
Berwyn, Illinois
(deemed adviseable)
CG T-4
CG 6690-C-TE
_. CG T-5
CG 6404-C-TE
Contacted By
On numerous occasions during
September, October, November,
1966 by SA WILLIAM F. ROEMER
November 14, 1966 by SAS JOHN
R. BASSETT and WILLIAM F.
ROEMER
November 1, 1966 to SA LENARD
A. WOLF
CG T-6
CV 654
CG T-7
NY 5642-C-TE
CG T-8
CG 6588-C-TE
CG T-9
CG 6792-C
CG T-10
CG 7049-PC
CG T-11
CG 6533-C
October 11, 1966 by SA LENARD .
A. WOLF
September 19, 1966 by SAs
MERLE B. HAMRE and JOHN J.
OITZINGER
October 13, 1966 by SA JOHN J..
BARRETT, Cleveland Office
August 30, 1966 by SA THOMAS L.
COLARELLI, New York OIIICe
October 20, 1966 by SA RUSSELL
R. GIRSCH
August 26, 1966
by
SA DENNIS
W. SHANAHAN
October 19, 1966 by SAs FRANK J.
FORD and MERLE B. HAVRE
October 20, 1966 to SA MAX R.
FRITSCHEL
- B.-
COVER PAGE
SEAR
n8102
DocId: 32287857
Page
3
---
## Page 4
CG
92-349
Source
CG T-12
CG 6786-PC
CG T-13
Attorney RAFAEL HERNANDEZ
OCHOA, Assistant Secretary of
Contaçted By
November 2, 1966 to SATRUBE
LE MARONE AU)
Actober 6, 1966
COVER PAGE
DocId: 32287857
Page 4
---
## Page 5
Fp. 201, (Rev. 3p99)
UN_ ED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ...STICE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Copy to:
1 - USA, Chicago
SECRE
SEE REVERSE
Report of:
Date:
SA WILLIAM F. ROEMER, JR.
E FOR
Office: Chicago
11/21/66
JEVICATLON
Field Office File #: CG 92-349
Bureau File #:
92-3
Title:
Character:
Synopsis:
SAMUEL M. GIANCANA
ALE MENRMATION CORTANCED
CC0ne
Ein there Signa
40.384
"r':
ANTI-RACKETEERING
Although daughters of GIANCANA continue to reside
at 1147 South Wenonah, Oak Park, Illinois, GIANCANA
has not been observed there or anywhere else in Chicago
rea auring september, October and November, 1966.
In August, 1966, GIANCANA known to be in Guatemala City,
Guatemala and on
*10/26/66 the Mexican Government was
advised by an attorney for GIANCANA that GIANCANA (US
is interested in applying for immigrant status in Mexico
for permanent residence there.
Information obtained
indicating possibility GIANCANA no longer active leader
of organized crime in Chicago area.
Information received
indicating GIANCANA has financial interest in Las Vegas
casinos, The Dunes, The Tropicana, and The Stardust.
Negative investigation to determine current whereabouts
of GIANCANA set out herein.
received indicating possibilityfofmeeting-.of.leaders
of organized crime throughout United.states-including-.m...as
GIANCANA to be held in Los Angeles area intlate October.
1966, no information developed
conf truing) that sucki
meeting ever took place. XS(4)
_P-
CLASS
REASON-I
DATA
OF
16323V
IM IT
181412
11022
4.198
Cleositte
Declassify
5206649
SECRET
This document contatns
neither recommendations nor conclusions
of the FBI.
It is the property of the fBI and is loaned to
your agency; it and its contents are
to be distributed
outside your agency. '
Caper
DocId: 32287857 Page 5
---
## Page 6
CG 92-349
-CAN I DENNA AMERI
SECRET
He gave a local Guatemalan address indicating tourist status.
He stated that he intended to travel to Argentina and South
marist from hate a 1? i pected to return to una united
states in October.
Mexico
CG T-13 an official of the Mexican Government,
advised on October 26, 1966, that SAMUEL GIANCANA applied for
immigrant status in Mexico, being represented by a reputable
Mexican attorney. CG T-13
declined to identify the attorney.
The informant also advised that GIANCANA'S request to immigrate
• Mexico was accompanied by a
similar request concerning a
relative of GIANCANA. (5) (49 (44)
7*
SARRET
1028.1933
DocId:32287857
Page
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10069-10195.pdf | 104-10069-10195 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 7/6/60 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CHIEF, CONTACT DIVISION | CHIEF, NEW YORK OFFICE | US GOVERNMENT OFFICE MEMO RE CONVERSATION WITH ALEXANDER I. RORKE RE CUBA | 3 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK14 : F47 : 1993.07.14.19:29:43:180310 : THE 3 PAGES INCLUDES A DUPLICATE 2ND PAGE. | 3 | ## Page 1
1104-10069-10795}
IMPO DITTRO STATES GOVERNWENT
SORRESS
Conver
Earing called an ate the cominaloss ily So ta 3 raci
of = telephone 0611 fra robert Recoza, i Mvision, to states
thot soris mont have inore on of value concertes Cube.
2:
Sorta is o tuls
o by bis mi adnission ispoomerant germalous.
beia share operetir..
reposter
and photograper to has worced socti,for the Rationel Broadcazting?
Carpeny on assigmentire says he 1ratso stylas to hate = 11urg bri
motudine docuentery dins for, beleysion station.cam 12 lewtork-
He clafro that he wiüt chorug soch for then a apremer: concerine
the raricus coups thick are to Sprosition to Castm. Borke's business
address to tac oftico oe als fathes an abtement Biogropale daba
concerniss Rorise is being Formaded ó dily 60.
•Cardebunn coundriet es a recult o2 ate venitorial vors in Tecaragis,
Penava, Coste Rici.,
223e Pad
other areas,.
and be sogs that because de
i aced enternet is ane printom of aids can he done duod facto ei
Commandan in Cibe,
sna 219 main the current inomonter 301e, do mar
been keenans in ciose touce with variors Cabor opapattion aroupes, ge
in: Lis Caribbean packground ut great loncts sodr
concrated be detti his vialto: so Micaragia, Pariare
avents the mentined
attelut. to recotiat then here
Poose dora ali sats bademna merely to tr
2r0ve.
ibe sinuation là Cuon end indesatezes tue versouc
poposition groupe:
Ze ter care to his reel point inici id tat te
regards Dues tanz.
same be has deen a, treat dead as ravanti, as the
most solutiot all tacoc who went to tare actica agaitas Cessro. Re
Cople in the Cuben aroy ans otto Caben Organinetiats to can
spyss, shed tae rigut tíne comes. Acebrains to Forke, Lony Sellares
that, the oarshould be done by Cubens' iron a base outside the way
bet lena to beare ard yesmarcost enough 3o Mee.
el succestau
a tells. Trashes, the necessary ars, and esmaition.
Rozze belt:
renter, than lenn Lo politically in the drue de the road,
is nob motivated by batred and could not bring soon a blood
Cubai
In chort, laè fools thet lanz would be vita tbe
son a it the
14/60274
DO NOT REPRODUCE
RETURN TO CA
# 08848
---
## Page 2
14-00000
noina
Re con ne
instencay
1s too. fan
3 aiszerent greyps:
amaito Morte, Tant Lao,
e con pet mes beve and
cateti
eut.: Al the she af teven Lode execta to laterit
124C B94326
ira:
Aradon his seraed de bond irithe rignt people:
Sonte belsoren Shus this
Gora En Norkere
ortise be edeirod a falopher cal?
Si: Mento to remam
13t : mora
12x0G fine:
sacrate forona firi nartue
inocaron in. Coufsdonsist Migealna,
¿avide Che dna 29 ca invarrion. Ruzice acaded co lire ertocot 2181
da 15 mag
T26220)66
hir.
70:
ze Chens t
ristacte:
1: 2uo dataila di Rosina: crare.
c -second.
---
## Page 3
14-00000
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10213-10027.pdf | 104-10213-10027 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 12/10/63 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | PARIS | CABLE: TO DATE, ONLY ITEM MENTIONING PRESIDENT KENNEDY | 2 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-48 : F36 : 20040311-1056963 : | 2 | ## Page 1
104-10213-10027*
CLA-SIFIED MESSAGE
IS SECRET
"AULTING
141
• TO
2515-
• DIRECTOR
FROM & PARIS
$1E.=4:
Hastie
AGTIONI CAHI.
R.О. 7 -ü.::
INTO A DEI, D/OCI, DOP, C/C1, fei/sta VR • joto:
Il desiractica.
•cite
reasons and coordicate
10 DEc 63 1N 7 7 1.48
SECRET 100858Z
DIR CITE PARI 1833
FE DIR 85133"
RY944 GPFLOOR
S. TO DATE, ONLY UNPRY ITEM MENTIONING PRESIDENT KENNEDY
ASSASSINATION IS BRIEF 27 NOVEMBER EXCHANGE BETWEEN UNLIFT/2 AND
0F
GROUP. THEY OBVIOUSLY BEEN STUDYING NEVSPAPER
ARTICLE AND PHOTOS RE DALLAS EVENTS.
SAID IS THIS THE GUY
WHO KILLED HIM (KENNEDY>? WZ ANSWERED "THAT IS OSWALD BUT I DON•T
THINK HE IS ONLY ONE INVOLVED. OSWALD SHOT TO DEATH BY RUBY AND LATTER
PICKED UP 8Y DALLAS POLICE. KILLING IN USA IS SO EASILY ACCOM
PLISHED. "
20 STA CÓNMENT. FRENCH PRESS HAS GIVEN SENSATIONAL COVERAGS
TO POSSIBILITY THAI ASSASSINATION WAS MANY-ANGLED PLOT, STRESSING
"SECOND MAN IN THE VINDOW". STA INTERPRETS ABOVE AS W/2 BRIEFING
C'S COPY
201-289248
SECRET
D-200-5 BY OTHER THAN ME ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBTED
Copy No
367-
-Document Number
S-727A
--5997
fOr FOIA Review on MAY 1976
---
## Page 2
CASSITIED MESSAGE ON GONE
IN 772$8
JON BASIS PRESS STORIES WE HAS READ. STA WILL CONTINUE UNPRY
COVERAGE AND REPORT ANY FURTHER RELATED COMMENTS.
3. NO INDEX.
SECRET
C/S COMMENTS. * DISSEMINATION APPLICABLE TO RYBAT DYVOLER GAFLOOR. CABLES.::
requested. any information on assassination of
President Kennedy.
Ethical
-25
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10336-10004.pdf | 104-10336-10004 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 9/5/97 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | PROJFILES-ARRB REQUESTS | CIA/HRG | ARRB | ARRB REQUEST: CIA-IR-5: POSSIBLE FOREIGN SOURCE FOR RECORDS ON OSWALD | 21 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK-M-20 : F5 : 20031120-1015139 : | 21 | ## Page 1
104-10336-10004
FYI
United States Department of State
Washington, D.C. 20520
April 8, 1997
David Marwell
Executive Director
Assassination Records Review Board
600 E Street, NW
2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20530
ASSASSINATION HE CORDS
BEVILV: 604BD-
Dear Mr. Marwell:
Enclosed is the diplomatic note received from the Mexican
government, dated March 12, 1997, which responds to the ARRB's
request for any additional documents that the Mexican
government might have relating to the assassination of
President John F. Kennedy•
The, Embassy evidently submitted the
request to the Mexican government on June 13, 1996, but did not
report the action through telegraphic channels. The reference
in the telegram is to our recent query.
The Mexican government note conveys copies of the
diplomatic notes exchanged between Mexico and the United States
in 1963-1964 regarding the initial U.S. request for Mexican
documents relevant to the investigation into Lee Harvey
Oswald's visit to Mexico in the fall of 1963.
Most of these
notes were published in volume XVIII of the Warren Commission
Report:
They also duplicate copies of the same correspondence
found in Legal Adviser's and Mexico City post files that are
included in State's collection at NARA.
enclosed
I have stamped
copies of pages bearing "confidential" classification
markings. I am also enclosing a copy of Mexico City telegram
~ 3078 of March 31.
According to my records, we have now received responses
from all posts contacted through the A bureau.
Minsk remains
ongoing. Final responses have been received from Bonn, Paris,
London, Moscow, and now Mexico City.
been received from from Tokyo and Ottawa.
mexto and ottawat
Interim responses have
As it has been some
time since Tokyo reported that the Japanese government would be
searching for documents, the ARRB might wish to prepare a
followup cable.
Sincerely,
lena flering
Nina J.
Noring
Department of State Liaison
JFK Assassination Records
Collection Act
Attachments:
As indicated.
---
## Page 2
13-00000
ISSINATION
REC
SECRET
Assassination Records Review Board
600 E Street NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20530
(202) 724-0088 • Fax: (202) 724-0457
EVIEW
BOAR
September 5, 1997
BY COURIER
Mr. John Pereira
Director
Historical Review Group
Center for the Study of Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, DC 20505
Re:
Request to CIA to contact|
Oswald telephone calls in Mexico City
regarding LIENVOY intercepts of
Some time ago the Review Board requested informally that CIA contact
Jin Mexico City for information related to Lee Harvey Oswald. During your
recent visit here we discussed with you the feasibility of your making such contacts. I
am writing in response to your request that we memorialize our request and provide
some background information.
The Review Board believes that all reasonable steps should be taken to account for all
telephonic intercepts of Oswald during his visit to Mexico City in September-October
1963. There is evidence that CIA intercepted some telephone calls through an operation
named LIENVOY (conductedl,
TWe
believe that it would be appropriate for CIA to contact directly[
to inquire as to whether the Mexican authorities retained copies of LIENVOY
telephonic take, specifically the actual recordings of Oswald's telephone calls to the
Soviet Embassy during the period of September 27 through October 3, 1963.
The Review Board previously has sought information from the Mexican Government
through appropriate diplomatic channels. For reasons that are obvious to those
familiar with Mexico City issues, the Review Board could not raise with Mexican
officials nor with the U.S. State Department the possible existence of additional tape
recordings that might be in the hands of certain officials. Thus, at the behest of the
Review Board, the Department of State requested that the Mexican federal government
and local government agencies conduct general searches of their files for records
related to the assassination of President Kennedy. The Mexican government responded
SECRET
BOARD MEMBERs: John R. Tunheim, Chair • Henry F. Graff • Kermit L. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson
ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR: David G. Marwell
---
## Page 3
13-00000
SECRET
Mr. John Pereira
September 5, 1997
Page 2
by sending copies of the same documentation and correspondence that the GOM had
made available to the Warren Commission in 1964.
The basis for our interest in your contacting appropriate Mexican Officials is found in
ClA document 104-10004-10199, which was reviewed by the Board on September 19,
1995. On page 5 of this document (not including the cover sheet) information that the
Board agreed to protect, due to the sensitivity of sources and methods involved,
suggests that the Mexican security forces may have had their own copy of the October 1
intercept on Lee Harvey Oswald. It is unclear whether this statement refers to the
transcript or to an actual tape containing the phone call. Nevertheless, it provides
enough evidence to warrant additional inquiries on this matter.
For your reference we are enclosing copies of the reference documents as well as copies
of the correspondence between the DOS and the Mexican government.
We would appreciate your contacting appropriate officials to determine what
reasonably can be known about this and related matters, and ask that you provide a
response to this request by November 14, 1997. We are fully aware of the sensitivity of
this type of request and do not wish to take any action that would compromise existing
intelligence operations. If necessary, we would be pleased to discuss with you ways in
which we might further elaborate on this request, including person-to-person
discussions with appropriate officials either here or in Mexico.
Thank you for your continued assistance and cooperation.
Sincerely yours,
Guilenter
T. Jeremy Gunn
General Counsel and Associate Director
for Research and Analysis
cc: J. Barry Harrelson, HRG
Enclosures
SECRET
---
## Page 4
13-00000
Descriptive Name:
CIA Request to J. Pereira
Descriptive Type:
Letter (Class. SECRET)
Subject:
CIA Request
Attachments:
CIA Doc. 104-10004-10199, DOS correspondence
Blind Copy:
Carbon Copy:
Barry Harrelson
Reference:
Classified CIA memos a:lcia-mc.02wpd
Document Number: File: 4.20.4
Date Completed:
9/5/97 12:00:00 AM
Checked By:
Jeremy Gunn
Typist:
Cathy Rodriguez
Author:
Irene Marr
-
---
## Page 5
13-00000
AGENCY
RECORD NUMBER
RECORD SERIES
AGENCY FILE NUMBER
SECRET - ypage only
Assassination Records Review Board
Final Determination Notification
CIA
104-10004-10199
JEK
201-289248
OSW10: V10B 1993.06.14.15:36:06:060000
September 19, 1995
Status of Document:
Postponed in Part
Number of releases of previously postponed information: 16
Reason for Board Action: The Review Board's decision was premised on several factors including: (a) the
significant historical interest in the document in question; (b) the absence of evidence that the release of
the information would cause harm to the United States or to any individual.
Number of Postponements: 6
Postponement # 1 (Page RS):
Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it reveals the identity of an intelligence agent that
properly may be withheld under Section 6(1)(A) of the JFK Act. The Board is awaiting additional
evidence from the CIA, at which time it will reconsider the postponement.
Substitute Language: See Document
Date of Next Review: 12/1995
Postponement # (Page (PageRS):
Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it reveals the identity of an intelligence agent that
properly may be withheld under Section 6(1)(A) of the JFK Act. The Board is awaiting additional
evidence from the CIA, at which time it will reconsider the postponement.
Substitute Language: See Document
Date of Next Review: 12/1995
Postponement # 3 (Page 1):
Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it discusses sources and methods that properly may
be withheld under Section 6(1)(B) of the JFK Act.
•Substitute Language: None: The redacted information contains no substantive information about the
assassination of President Kennedy or about Lee Harvey Oswald.
Date of Next Review: 2017
SECRET
---
## Page 6
13-00000
Postponement # 4 (Page 2):
Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it discusses sources and methods that properly may
be withheld under Section 6(1)(B) of the JFK Act.
Substitute Language: None: The redacted information contains no substantive information about the
assassination of President Kennedy or about Lee Harvey Oswald.
Date of Next Review: 2017
Postponement # 5 (Page 5):
Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it discusses sources and methods that properly may
be withheld under Section 6(1)(B) of the JFK Act
Substitute Language: None: The redacted information references "the 1 October intercept on Lee Oswald"
and the possible existence of another copy of that "intercept" that was discovered after the assassination.
The redacted information contains no other substantive information about the assassination of President
Kennedy or about Lee Harvey Oswald.
Date of Next Review: 2017 :
Postponement # 6 (Page 14):
Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it discusses sources and methods that properly may
be withheld under Section 6(1)(B) of the jFK Act.
Substitute Language: None: The redacted information contains no substantive information about the
assassination of President Kennedy or about Lee Harvey Oswald.
Date of Next Review: 2017
Board Revlew Completed: 08/03/95
---
## Page 7
13-00000
LET UNCLASSILIEDR
SUBJECT: (Optional 213 ris
FROM::
NTERNAL
BE- USE ONLY
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
EXTENSION
LICOOPNATEPEI
RESECRET :
«CIA HISTORICAL DEMON DOC
RELE
• TO: (Offor
building is deleno
c/cr
RECEIVED?
FORWARDED
10.
[SCELSO]
12.
13.
avor
A610 USE
PREVIOUS
1- EOIIONS
CONFIDENTIAL
INTERNAL.
USE ONLY AT LA
NCLASSIFIED
---
## Page 8
13-00000
"P.4:
SECRET
and othus senses my bur talen bored os our sort le menin that the
Fat my bare mun 10002 chooke sioust Medoms nthettten to men 18
runtiuntion has contiand all the detetle of lio 19119, shere he stayes,
wal what he did to eveta cronster 1500a with the fat, dar Mesice Station
Minico on 3 October and is no loner there when our mport me jut out.
Dinos thie talmphens top operution te
the Maccan nita bad the 1 October Intercept on Joe DEMAID,
but 1t parently lumbered in theis flim intil the seanination tod
12000.
her 3963
When word of the shouting of Irnsident Sunzedo trachal the 0ff100s
os our operatina diviatons and starte on the altarzoon el totany de Heven..
bar 1969, translotor tello unre surred ou everyboro to fallou the
tre, When the hase of Ise ONALD van huand, the estact mas elastrio.
A phone meton fren the ta cue et soont the nam
• time, nurina OSHALD
SECRET
---
## Page 9
13-00000
TL: 202-647-5094201
P. 003
OUTGOING
TELEGRAM
PAGE 01
APA 24384217 55 4911. °GG
ORIGIN A-08
INFO L0G-00
ARA-BO
OASY-BE DIM-gD
TEDE-08 L-80
1MIS-02 DSCC-90
DRAFTED BY: 0/ IM/ I S/FPC/PPA: MPGRAFELD
APPROVED BY: A: PFKENNEDY
MIM/IS: EVILSON• A/IMEGEISELA A/IM/IS/FPC: PSHEILS
ARA/MEX: DURS
-310619 2321102 /38
R 2321071 APR 96
FM, SEGS TAFE-WASHDC
MEHBASSY MEXICO
UNCLAS STATE B84217
FOR TUE ANBASSADOR FROM ASSISTANT SECRETARY KENNEDY
E.0. 12956: N/A
TAGS:
AINF
SURJECT: JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS
COLLEGTION ACT OF 1992
1. THE ASSASSIMATION RECORDS COLLECTION ACT OF 1992
THE "ACT" WAS SIGNED INTO LAW ON OCTOBER 26г 1992.
THE ACT ESTABLISHED A PROGESS FOR IDENTIFYING AND:
SECURING ALL RECORDS RELATING TO THE ASSASSINATION OF
PRESIDENT KENNEDY AND COLLECTING THEM IN THE
PRESIDENT JON F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS
COLLECTION AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES IN COLLEGE PARKA
MARYLAND. THE ACT ALSO ESTABLISHED THE ASSASSIMATION
RECORDS REVIEN BOARD (ARAB) TO COORDIMATE AND QUERSEE
THE PROCESS. THE DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN WORKING GLOSELY
WITH THE ARRB TO ENSURE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THESE
REQUIREMENTS AND OVER A YEAR AGO PRODUCED ITS
COLLECTION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES.
Z. THERE REMAINS, HOMEVER ONE PROVISION OF THE ACT.
FOR WHICH THE SECRETARY MUST RELY ON YOUR OFFICE FOR
INPLEMENTATION. THE ACT ENVISIONED AN APPROACH TO
FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS FOR ANY RECORDS THAT THEY MIGHT
POSSESS. SPECIFICALLY, SECTION 10 QU (21 OF THE ACT
STATES THAT IT IS THE "SENSE OF CONGRESS THAT THE
SECRETARY OF STATE SHOULD CONTACT. .. MY FOREIGN
GOVERNMENT THAT MAY HOLD INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE
ASSASSIMATION AND SEEK DISCLOSURE OF SUCH INFORMATION. *
113*
3. IN ITS CONGRESSIONALLY MANDATED SEARCH FOR
ASSASSIMATION RECORDS. THE ARRB WISHES TO DETERMINE
WHETHER THE MEXICAN GOVERMMENT OR LOGAL GOVERMMENT
AGENGIES IN MEXICO MAINTAIN RECOLOS THAT ARE RELATED TO
THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY. THE ARRE NOTES
THAT THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY ATTRACTED
THE ATTENTION OF THE WORLDS AND THAT THE RESPONSE OF
THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT TO THE EVENT WOULD BE ORac::
INTEREST. INFADDITIONE RECONDS OF MEXICAN AUTHORITIES
CONCERNING LEE HARVEY OSTALD'S VISIT TO MEXICO CITYAIN
: SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 1963 WOULD BE OF INSERS A
1. WITHOUT BEING AWARE OF THE STRUCTURE AND
ORGAMIZATION OF POTENTIALLY RELEVANT MEXICAN FILES, THE
ARRE CANNOT PROVIDE SPECIFIC GUIDANCE ON THE
APPROPRIATE STRATEGY FOR ENSURING A COMPREHENSIVE
SEARCH.
THE ARRB IS WILLING TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION THAT MAY BE REQUIRED. ANY SEARCH FOR
REGORDS SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
UNCLASSIFIED
Department of State
SHC9833
STATE 884217 232106Z
CAI ANY AND ALL RECORDS RELATED TO TRE AETIVITIES OF
THE MEXICAN AUTRORITIES DESCRIBED IN THE DIPLOMATIG
CRYE -88
NOTES 70 THE UNITED STATES ENBASSY ON MEXICO CITY FROM
THE MEXICAN SECRETARIAY OF FOREICN RELATIONS NO. 504826
DATED MAY 161
1964, AND NO. 565583 DATED JUNE 9, 1964.
THESE ACTIVITIES IRCLUDE:
-CLOSURE OF THE BORDER BY THE DEPARTRENT OF THE
INTERIOR ON NOVENDER 22, 1963;
--DEPLOYMENT OF TROOPS THAT SAME DATE "TO TIGHTEN
SURVEILLANCE IN TRE BORDER AREA• ESPECIALLY AT REYNOSA
CIUDAD MIQUEL ALEMAN NUEVO LAREDOE AND MATAMOROS;* AND
-- INVESTICATION OF OSWALD'S TRIP TO MEXICO CITY IN
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 19630 AND ESPEGIALLY OF HIS MEANS OF
ENTERING AND EXITING MEXICO AND&HIS-CONTACTS-WITH
SILVIA TIRADO-DURAN AN-EMPLOYEE OF THE CUBAN CONSULATE
BI ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS THAT IDENTIFY: AMERICAN
REQUESTS TO MEXICO FOR INFORNATION ABOUT THE
ASSASSIRATION AND TRE MEXICAN RESPONSES TO THOSE
REQUESTS.
IC) ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS, STUDIES,. INQUIRIES OR
INVESTIGATIONS BY MEXICAN GOVERNHENT ENTITIES OF THE
ASSASSINATION.
TAL BOTT
SHG9833
---
## Page 10
13-00000
SECRET
(DRAFT)
CSI 1997-444
25 September 1997
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DO/LA
Fred Wickham, DO/IMS
John F. Pereira
Chief, CSI/HRG
Priority Request from Chairman,
JEK Assassination Records Board
1.
(S) The purpose of this memorandum is to advise you of
priority request from the Chairman of the JFK Assassination Records
Review Board (ARRB) .
The request concerns records related to Lee
Harvey Oswald that may be held by the Mexican Government.
2. (S) At his initiative, I met recently with the ARRB
Chairman, Judge John Tunheim. He said the reason for the meeting was
to ask that CIA assist the Board by making inquiries
determine if the Mexican Government has certain records related to
Oswald's activities in Mexico in late 1963. Of particular interest
to the Board is whether the Mexicans have copies
of tapes from joint
(tel-tap operations, including coverage of Oswald's telephone calls
to the soviet Embassy. He said that locating such records
is "the
highest priority of the Board." (The attached letter from the
ARRB's General Counsel explains the Board's interest.)
3.
Earlier this year, the Board sought unsuccessfully
to obtain information about Oswald from the Mexican Government
via the State Department. (See attached cable.)
Mexico responded
by providing copies of the same material that had been made
available to the Warren Commission in 1964.
The problem for the
Board was
that, in
making the request to Mexico, it did not want
to reveal information about
the Board knew of from CIA records. Being sensitive to the
Agency's request to protect this information, Tunheim would like
the Agency, to contact
directly) on the Board's
behalt.
CL BY 0185904
CL REASON 1.5 (b,c, &d)
DECL BY X1
DRV FRM LIA 2-82
---
## Page 11
13-00000
SECRET
SUBJECT:
Priority Request from Chairman,
JFK Assassination Records Board
(FOUO) During the meeting with Tunheim, I said that we
would discuss his request with the appropriate people in the
Agency.
In view of the priority that Tunheim places on this
matter, I recommend that our JFK Project Leader (Barry Harrelson)
and I meet with you or other appropriate DO representatives soon
to discuss possible
options for responding to the request.
John Pereira
Attachments
CL. BY (0185904
CL REASON 1.5 (b,C, 8d)
DECL BY X1
DRV FRM LIA 2-82
---
## Page 12
13-00000
SECRET
CL BY: 611637)
CL REASON: Section 1.5 d
DECL ON: X5
DRV FAM: LIA 2-82
1 December 1997
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Ja Do
Frearck c. wIcKnam @ DO
FROM:
J. Barry Harrelson
JFK Project Officer
CSI/HRG
OFFICE:
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
JFK Board Request - Mexico City
Request from ARRB Chairman, Judge Tunheim re Intercepts of Oswald's calls;
Letter fr ExDir, ARRB, to C/HRG dated Sept 5, 1997 same subject
I provided copies of the two Oswald telephone intercepts received from the Station to the ARRB staff. The ARRB staff has
responded with a number of questians for the Station to ask [
] The list of questions is being faxed to you; please call
if you have not received it by noon today (Monday). Judge Tunheim will be in Washington on 15 December and has ask for an update on
the status of the request.
Thank you for your assistance with this request, if you have any questions please call me on 31825.
Barry
CC:
John Pereira @ DCI
Sent on 1 December 1997 at 10:14:23 AM
SECRET
---
## Page 13
13-00000
FAx'd 10:25Am
12/1191
SECRET
Classification of Material Transmitted
HISTORICAL REVIEW GROUP
CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF INTELLIGENCE
Phone # 703-613-1806
PLEASE DELIVER IMMEDIATELY
****
CLASSIFIED FAX
SUBJECT: QUESTIONS FOR.CDS
FROM: BARRY HARRELSON, SCIICSI/HRG
SENDING FAX NO. 703-613-30607
DELIVER TO:
X77 148
DO) LA
RECEIVING FAX NO. 703-234-10967
DATE TRANSMITTED: *1/9, PAGES TRANSMITTED: 2
(including cover sheet)
TRANSMITTED BY: BUNNiE HUNTER
+47777777777
*****
+7773724
MESSAGE:
PRIORITY
SECRET
Classification of Material Transmitted
---
## Page 14
13-00000
secret
Classification of Material Transmitted
FAX. COVER SEBE1
SUBJECT: QueSTIOns
FROM: michelle combs
SENDING FAX NO: 202-638-4274
DEVaRTO: Barry Hamelson
RECEIVING FAX NO: 703-613-3060
DATE TRANSMITTED: 7 210097
PAGES TRANSMITTTED (including cover sheet) 2.
I"d
36. 9O NHE
---
## Page 15
13-00000
SECRET
Barry,
These are our questions to be passed to the COS with our thanks.
Michelle
1. Can we have the original documents?
2. Does the date and location appear on the original documents? is there any indication
as to when and where they were added?
3. Is there a Spanish version of the transcripts? Can we have it if one exists?
4. Where were the two transcripts found? What file or box? Who found them?
5. What else is in the file or box where these two transcripts were found?
6. Are there any additional files on the assassination or any post assassination
investigation still in existence?
7. Were any files on the assassination or any post assassination investigation
destroyed under a routine records destruction schedule?
8. Are there any teltap tape recordings from the era 1960-1963 still in existence?
9. Are there any individualswho were involved in the teltap, the Sylvia Duran
interrogation, and/or any post assassination investigation who could be interviewed
by the ARRB?
10. Are there any persons knowledgeable about the filing system and records
management both in 1963 and to the present who could be interviewed by the
ARRB and might have some knowledge of the disposition of any teltap
information, any Syliva Duran interrogation records, and /or any assassination or
post assassination records in the archives?
SECRET
• .
---
## Page 16
13-00000
OCT 21 '97 22:01 MEXI
206•
MO:
NO:
a20:
loane see the Spanish tranaeria lo 6
spuala in English to semoso In tao bsolspowen: I0 said viali
(RE. 22 20 5, 25)
• Do you spoal Rundlan? Yes. lay don't Jen 50110 11ml
I don't know.. MO takos tha phoso end ifs 1a crocoa Jussieri
I was 1a goin Inbassy and spoiso to you concur, Just a minute
MI tatos tao phone asd acts 10 17 Inglish mast dos be want?
(1a Russian/ Floase spoak Riselame
What also do you want:
I was just now at your sabassy and they sodd my eddress
I lazow that.
apoaks terrible, herdly recogaizablo Russian/ I did 10t
know it then. I went to the Cuben Inbeesy to sa 10r 105
• I address, because they bave 1t..
Viay don't Jos cono' agaiz and loave your eddause with us,
not far fron the Cubm Erbassy.
Well, I'll be shere sagat away.
29 Septanbes 1933
Sortet Imbassy
**.
---
## Page 17
13-00000
ul car ceili mesa
P. 3
P3:"
151.
MO:.
OBY:
LES:
OBY:
03%:
LEE:
In at tea 18) 10/ tho sano porcon uho peedd a dur do es
ago and spoke 11 broson Ruscian/ spouce so CariOT.
fello, this yes
OSWED (phos) spoaking. I was au your placa
last Saturday and spoke to a consul, and touy said that
they'd serd a talegram to Wascington, so i Wassue to fluc
out 1f you have anything now? But I don' renaibes the Zama
of that concis
KOSTIKOV. Ee 13 daris /halT 0r 8k13?/.
XeS. MY SONS IS OSWAID.
Just a minute I'1l fine out. Icey say trau they inventt
received su this yet..
Have they core anything?
Yes, they say that a request has beon sont out, but total=s
has beer receivod as yet.
And what...? /OlY hangs up/.
249.
• (previously transcribed)
• * Octaber 1963
Soviet Inbassy
---
## Page 18
13-00000,
SECRET
CL BY:0185904
CL REASON: Section 1.5 d
DECL ON: X5
DAV FRM: LIA 4-82
NOTE FOR:
Ermund Enhen @ DA
# DA
FROM:
OFFICE:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Lee S. Strickland @ DA
John F. Pereira
CSI/HRP
01/23/98 05:19:59 PM
Meeting with Chair, JFK Board
(S) At his request, I met with the Chairman of the JFK Board, Judge Jack Tunheim this morning for more than an hour. A principal
topic of discussion was the status of the Agency's response to Tunheim's request that we ask
to provide records and
other information related to Oswald's time in Mexico. (The station is following up on a preliminary response]
(FOUO)Tunheim described efforts the Board is making to obtain records directly from the KGB , with State Department assistance. Not
much success so far.
(FOUO) We also discussed the general relationship between the Board and CIA, about which he was very positive. He is aware that we
have added resources to step up the pace of our review in view of the 1 September deadline. He said that he does not see much chance
that Congress would extend the Board's charter again.
Ed: Tunheim asked that we set up a meeting with you on 18 Feb, when he'll be in town for a meeting of the Board.
CG:
J. Barry Harrelsonl
Sent on 23 January 1998 at 05:19:59 PM
SECRET
---
## Page 19
13-00000
MEMORANDUM
September 19, 1998
To:
CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
RELGASE IN FULL
2000
Laura Denk
Executive Director
cc:
From:
Bob Skwirot
CIA Team Leader
Michelle Combs Michelle Conto
Associate Director for Research and Review
Subject:
CIA-IR-05 Possible Foreign Source for Records on Oswald
The Review Board requested that the CIA assist in locating and acquiring records
relevant to Lee Harvey Oswald and the assassination of President John Kennedy which
might exist in the files of a foreign government agency. Due to the foreign liaison
sensitivity of this request, information on this issue was passed between the CIA,
Review Board Chairman Judge John Tunheim, and one Review Board staff member.
On September 15, 1998, Chairman Tunheim and I flew to Houston to consult with CIA
Directorate of Operations officers on the likelihood of the existence of additional
records and the possibility that the CIA would be successful in acquiring these records.
These CIA officers demonstrated that they had consulted numerous times with the
senior officials of the foreign government but had, thus far, been unsuccessful in
obtaining additional records or in confirming, visually, the existence of additional
records. The CIA agreed to continue to work to obtain these records.
e: \combs \cia-ir05.wpd
File 4.20.1 and 4.20.4
---
## Page 20
13-00,00
re CIA IRO5
Assassination Records Review Board
600 E Street NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20530
(202) 724-0088 • Fax: (202) 724 0457
& BN
December 18, 1997
CLA BRESLAL COLLECTIONS
RELZASE IN FULL
Mr. John Pereira
Chief
2000
Historical Review Group
Center for the Study of Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 02505
Re:
Status of CIA Responses to Assassination Records Review Board's Requests for
Additional Information and Records
Dear John:
I am writing to follow-up on our telephone call earlier today and to convey my serious
concern about the status of CIA's responses to the Review Board's requests for
additional information and records. Although CLA has completed its responses to
several requests, and many others have been answered in part, a significant number of
requests have not been answered - including some that were made more than two
years ago. On many occasions we have been assured that responses would be
forthcoming, only to have promised dates come and go without answers. It is now
extremely important that these requests be answered promptly so that we may conduct
a proper follow-up if necessary. The issues that we can now identify as being of the
highest priority are identified in the text below by double asterisks (**)' and we request
that they be answered within the next month. We request that the remaining requests
be answered by April 1, 1998.
The remainder of this letter is divided into two parts: first, a listing of the formal
requests for information and records, and second, a listing of the informal requests for
information and records. Please let me know if your understanding of any of the
following points differs from ours so that we can resolve any potential discrepancies.
'As identified more fully below, the issues are: CIA-1 Organizational Material,
CLA-6 Cables and Dispatches, CIA-13 Backchannel Communications, CLA-IR-03
HTLINGUAL Documents, CIA-IR-04 Disposition of Angleton Files, CIA-IR-07 Claude
Barnes Capehart, CIA-IR-15 Electronic "take" from Mexico City, CIA-IR-21 DRE
Monthly Operational Reports, CIA-IR-22 " A" Files on Clay Shaw and Jim Garrison.
BOARO MEMBERS: JOhn R. Tunheim, Chair • Henry F. Graff • Kermir !. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson
---
## Page 21
13-00000
Mr. John Pereira
December 18, 1997
Page 7
Documents file: documents Nos. 496, 498, 499, 500, and 510. The Review Board
is awaiting confirmation that these documents are at HIRG for processing.
CIA-IR-05 Possible Foreign Source for Records on Oswald.
CIA was informally requested to use its contacts to pursue certain records
related to Oswald that were orally described to CIA. The Review Board
understands that the CIA has taken steps to pursue these records.
CIA-IR-06 QKENCHANT.
The Review Board seeks information regarding the purpose of QKENCHANT
and its connection with Clay Shaw, Howard Hunt, and Monroe Sullivan.
The Review Board was initially provided some information in regard to this
request that now appears to be incorrect. CIA is now seeking additional
information to correct or to clarify its previous answers. The Review Board seeks
an immediate, full, and accurate formal response to this request. Once the formal
statement is provided, this request will be complete.
**CIA-IR-07 Claude Barnes Capehart.
The ARRB staff has reviewed all records that CIA has been able to locate to date.
During the course of this review, additional questions were raised that CIA
agreed to pursue. CIA also agreed to conduct additional searches to determine
whether there may be additional retrievable records on Mr. Capehart. The
Review Board seeks a full and accurate formal response to this request. Once the
formal statement is provided, this request will be complete.
• CIA-IR-08 Unredacted Copy of the "Family Jewels" Memoranda.
ARRB has reviewed a redacted version of the "Family Jewels." Additional
questions have been raised. At meeting between HRG, ARRB and the DCI/IRO
on December 11, 1997, specific redacted pages were identified for ARRB staff
review. These pages should be made available as soon as possible.
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10161-10321.pdf | 104-10161-10321 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 1/1/64 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | ADDRESS COVER SHEET. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK45 : F17 : 20040301-1051573 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10161-10321
WASILINGTON
3 LEAN OFFICE
Take Jorge Washington Park Way
to BPR turnoff.
1820 N. Ft. Meyer Drive
Roslyn,
Va.
JOhn HART sur Millips?
/Ops -
Ext: 3481
638-5074 (Area Code
hicoil010: 109-8049 (Area Code 301)J8
- Walter CINI (pronounced Chini
0S ReD, 3E04
FT - S
Hair Hask.f
Pal Bearat
3..
Exte
6528
Dĩd/s pads, oto)
703
2922
ncealment
Ext.
Ext.
03
2292
Wil - William V. BROE
AH - Jake ESTERLINE
(Exod & Persornel)
WIl 3 = LArry STERNFIELD
NDP • Desmond FITZGERAL
RECTOR - DicK HELMS
BUk-South - Ed FENNIMORE Ron 4824
Il/Cuba • Les RATY
(pronounced Rattl
FUR -Ralph KISLY us
x-6313
spain
_(friend
of
WASHINGTON
(A.C WITTE & Dorthy)
(10125 Markham
Ave.) 0б
(Four Corners)
Silver Spring.
Md.
Home: 593-0368
08
Off. EXt. 4147
- Russ Jon
Ed
LAFFIN
5614
06
& Maj-Lis
6314 Tulsa Lane* 66
Bethesda,
Md.
Home: (460-63894811
off Ext. 6223
*Irom Bolt exit at Old Georgetown Rd
(Clemente HERNANDEZ
American Institute for free
Labor Development
1925 K St N.W.
Social Projects
Phone:
965-2100(Area Code202
635-3172 (Area Code703
06
Sally SWINSON
(3707 Leland St) 0
They Cast- MeT 08
c/o MrS. Robert Phelps
Fred
HENDFRSON) 06X-6523 Room 5C40
G629 Beacon Lane 06
Falle Church, Virginia 22043
Mathew NOCULLOUGT O6 Kin 283603
(10401 Grosvenor Place) Apt 2322 8
Phone 1 7493-9534)
Phone:
(35/- 6223
from out BCG.
71 x=4460
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32576377.pdf | 124-10223-10362 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | 04/17/2018 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | null | 12/15/2017 | null | ## Page 1
FD-36 (Rev. 10-29-63)
FBI.
1/15/65
Date:
(Type in plain text or code)
AIR MAIL - REGISTERED
(Priority)
Transmit the following in
AIRTEI
Via
TO :
FROM:
RE:
Director, FBI
SAC, Los Angeles (92-1112)
LA COSA NOSTRA
ANTI-RACKETEERING -
CONSPIRACY
6
JAF
Re Los Angeles radiogram to Bureau and New York
dated 1/13/65.
on 1/13/65 LA 4448-C-TE furnished the following
information:
On the night of 1/12/65 informant was visiting
with NICK LICATA,
"Under-Boss"
of the Los Angeles
"Brugad"
of La Cosa Nostra.
they
Part of their discussion related to the intensified
investigation by local, and in particular. Federal investigative
agencies into the activities of La Cosa Nostra and its
leaders.
In this connection,
LICATA told informant,
Thing will never be destroyed"
• He expressed confidence ir
the ability of the organization to resist infiltration and
discussed certain reprisals taken against "members"
enemies in past years.
3) Bureau (REGISTERED)
→ Chicago (Encl. 4) REGISTERED
Clevelana inch;
4) (REGISTERED
Dallas (Enc1. 0) REGISTERED
Denver (Encl. 4) (REGISTERED
2
2
"Detroit (Encl. 4) (REGISTERED.
- Kansas City (Encl. 4) (REGISTE
- New YorK (RA 24) (REGSTERED)
- Phoenix (Encl.
4) (REGISTERED,
- Portland' (Encl. 4) (REGISTERED'
2
2
4) REGISTERED
- Pittsburg city EncI: 4) (REGISTERED)
2 - San Diego (Encl. 8)
2
- San Francisco (Enc.10)
(REGISTERED)
- Seattle (Enci. 4) (E
- Los Angeles
NEY/sef
92-6054
BE JAN 18 1965
Approved:
2919
Sent
- M
Per
rat Agent in Charge
DocId: 32576377 Page 1
1
---
## Page 2
LA 92-1112
LICATA then
told informant that in addition to
the larger better-known
"Brugads"
of the bast and Mid-West.
that the
Now sork arousat in particular littie was inown of
organization"
had smaller
discussed
- about whom
-- located at various places throughout the
country.
As an illustration, LICATAmentioned "our group"
in San Francisco, and "our group"in San Jose, California.
He then identified the "Boss"
of the San Francisco group
JAMES LANZA and the "Boss" of the San Jose group as JOE
as
CERRITO. LICATA also spoke of another such group as
"our
group"
in Texas. He did not elaborate further, but the
inference drawn by informant was that other such small
sroups were located elsewhere, and their existence was not
a matter
of general knowledge
to all "members"
of other
"Brugads"
In connection with the San Francisco and San Jose
groups, informant advised that he had little contact with
these
one
"Brugad" with the atways presumed that they were part of
under one
"Boss"
with the other group operating as a
"Caporegima"
whom informant had thought was JOSEPH CERRITO.
He noted that this might still be the case and LICATA was
actually identifying the-man in charge
"on the spot"
as JOSEPH ADAMO might be referred to as the
"Boss"
of the
San Diego group, although he is actually a "Capo" under the
Los Angeles "Boss"
VICATA then referred again to the "Commissione"
City as its
City ate enthunters the
"organization"and New York
•He pointed out that since the
publicity of the Apalachin Meeting, that such large
meetings no longer occur and leaders of these smaller
the "Conmis fenerally, do not have direct contact with
In this connection, he mentioned that FRANK DESIMONE
"Boss" of the Los Angeles
"Brugad"
Western
"Brugads" before the
"Commissione" on thos smaller
on those
occasions when a Western U.
S. representative was necessary.
After such meeting:, according to LICATA, it was the
responsibility of DESIMONE to relay the instructions of the
"Commissione" to the "Bosses" of other Western "Brugads"
- 2 -
DocId:32576377
Page 2
---
## Page 3
LA 92-1112
LICATA did not further identify such groups.
He did mention that DESIMONE had numerous
expenses in connectior
le also mentioned that DESIMONE had to oc
at least a half dozen times last year and after
such trips he had to relay instructions to certain other
"Bosses"
• Again, LICATA did not further identify such
contacts except to mertionission lucil had amons other
Contact Texelayed sate
instructions to "the
, on at least one occasion last year (This
may possibly be JOSEPH FRANCIS CIVELLO Of the Dallas,
Texas area, known at least on occasion in the past, to have been
in contact
with the Los Angeles "Brugad"
LICATA then told informant in strict confidence --
requestine informant not to discuss this with any other
"member" of the
-- that DESIMONE had to be in
New York on 1/25/65 to attend a meeting of the
"Commissione"
LICATA did not state that he knew the purpose of
unis neeting, but speculated tost t possibly would relate
to the appointment of a new
for the JOE
by all the other
"Brusad" end, perhared "reconition of this "Brugad"
in La Cosa Nostra. He did
indicate, however, that after this meeting, "Bosses" to
it would again
be necessary for DESIMONE to contact other
relay "Commissione" instructions.
-
the late JACK DRAGNA (deceased in 1950) as
Los Angeles "Brugad"
of La Cosa Nostra.
DESIMONE was an
attendee at the Apalachin Meeting in November, 1957.
For a number of months, DESIMONE has not resided
in the Los Angeles area and his whereabouts are known only to
his very closest associates.
between himself and
"members" of the Los Angeles
of the Los Angeles "Brust"atact
matters
of special urgency only.
the only individual known
to have regular contact with him is "Under-Boss" NICOLO
LICATA.
of DESIMONE to the individual
It iS LIVATA who relainemerinstruction aga orders
LICATA has not confided to other "members"
as to the
- 3 -
DocId:32576377
Page 3
---
## Page 4
LA 92-1112
whereabouts of DESIMONE or where they meet.
Recent investigation has determined that DESIMONE
is presently residing at 517 Tyron Street, El Cajon,
California.
This home and all utilities are listed
in the
name of an
associate, PETE MONTANA. DESIMONE, has apparently
kept his residence here a well-guarded secret.
This
information has been handled in a most discreet manner
by the San Diego and Los Angeles Offices.
Following is a description of DESIMONE:
Name
Sex
Race
Nationality
Date of birth
Place of birth:
Height
Weight
Hair
Eyes
Marital status
FBI #
Automobile
Occupation
Characteristics
Residence
FRANK DESIMONE
Male
White
American
7/17/09
Fueblo,
Colorado
5'11"
190 pounds
Brown
Brown
Single
770 726 C
1960 White
Cadillac,
coupe De ville
license QXE 608
California
Attorney
Wears thick lensed dark glasses;
reportedly blind or nearly blind
in right eye.
7838 Adoree, Downey, California
-
RECOMMENDATION
Reference is made to information outlined
above indicating that DESIMONE
represents other
"Brugads"
in the Western United States at certain
"Commissione
meetings and that he then relays instructions to other
Reference is also made to certain remarks made
ESTER EIDAD So intorant (upra) inaluating the existence
- 4 -
DocId: 32576377 Page 4
--- |
||||||||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10195-10008.pdf | 104-10195-10008 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 01/01/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | ADDP, C/CI/R&A | AC/WH/COG | MEMORANDUM WITH ATTACHMENTS: SUBJECT - GARRISON AND THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION | 16 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-30 : F10 : 1998.04.08.19:26:41:030115 : | 16 | ## Page 1
104-10195-10008
•rt Almona
moun belando : .
CIT:A 1"
MUt:H0d A.ed120X30
Pecca)
1111,01:
te-ci"
glitter
1.11.01
lorelle dati i
9M111
:il.':
dian.
lion a!?.
Parairan:
8: 0970134-111
much 1n101
.A
Plo egiti
1:1
13:3
thdiihm1a
111.0813
•.-1.
".1."
tie:
---
## Page 2
1i0 id doae 1i7-199
---
## Page 3
"Poan
Midtelaahrit
nio elna dodes dlel ceredeonór mrodedcnchara)
le to
::.
inigs
..', .A
N'1°
Fil
toinli
.illiad®
•A1L:
Mirrdlieda iel bil%
NUS
1221
Gili
th.:
1.5".
Jasnn
Calt
Aneigs ohe
ARCACHNA
s lnxe
ind?ercaasa
ric'ómaoné
Ltiginles
01"
Mlabordt
BUC C HU1
solici veucon
:! ):
Lir.t'lie
?Ma SOTON
isd."
". til
1iilble
iririande.
2lodl
dahee
MIcRidon!d
1:14•
X":, Oili?.
'i"rie!'
lein:eirlado
•ureer. t'ig
llviii
Maiho d ChnGLande
fivinis
• **8
ilad colgi condio sáomatt
bälas
Cax'g
raiite"
nae i" tnadedliil
itwoma, solie".
peuninead Cubäns
D01.
Lhic:
daatiaaanal drceé eoai
uiisir'iràs.
•I 11.
id tre;
Jazdtrike
1iol calel deleclo iat
AACACIl!
Jate.
iyat
slree do odmaete nii.a
dee coin-dt ao umseci ta icoel
Hiai Mrleaosa
"i".
uris:
ALIICi
ti: lsadcoa
.i:.
dis Hioril TlEsl, Caracis,
Liata'ci
Oldar:
•aiEXI1'1
Uw3:
15 1026. Puplesses Strsel,
---
## Page 4
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 5
cd-idono;
iázje=
Nyrrnns
4:t0 29. 2s/1)
"rlos
Hytllee ts
:1
clretaroe od Duan Fo Gio DGrNGobka
ii lirgo sii
ci: :":
inbolilao1l.
Hils.
Ticraadio 1001
hn wti ccaptored
tormairn!l
r...1:
GClA's-0!
iils
MalodS l teimynl
i it
in
Cticl;
aeo lle beelled Calelor aae
Taakyxa
was an yogis colil it
'thi
lime ol .uains xecgutlmeste
1'31
lt'iir.
---
## Page 6
tina.
ili: ti.
...i ris
..i.."
...i!'
i.
---
## Page 7
14-00000
1*:96 : 1
H:*::
•atmidlo gll ö:li
re dope ge ci incor Toinactee) cis
i...l.:
•2oe dot Orieaoe.' Rodrasadhai".
':.,
:.
...!s: doine Coloor Poslg Cigtlolin
•o,"!"
rse?
,.1:.
Paelpli
t.ilo
Hillleef
plino" a1!
r..18d..d iee 1.e61 L5
1rChe 1es frisone.
impirieols.
a':.e'rtalei9'
d.tiin.
noli ii ilptiadid'lléni
ririi:
I. i
1.'.-
I'si nl'
1o cinlaat satis
1!10: 415
11e199
i::i.
1t'1
473/5
/•t•'d
..1:.'.
'Ü::'
i..lel
iidso
g'."'a
•1 41
. 1.
is tro
•mil, i1s
parolk
14492353301 90 22
::14119°
ci "cordiben
kil!i
lunitol:.
1!:..
il!
sironird init
inladog iindd
inte
10!!:
ieriit liltial:
"irtil
ks:!
1Iтs,
il'.j
inocin't"
ie.
1D2 40.
11 1:,
Nho
Urleans
Xadaaa
L't:
CovIn:
ti. Fore
Bạn Aub y
---
## Page 8
ici
lin
11ad
cilin
10
1:0%1
Hotsid
1.d 119:!
....,
: 101:1
1l:17.::a
Sile
1:220is
1ii.
W.13
Liniciava
Madras
Peti:
tians.
1lon
la trei
1111:
ss e
on variou::
Lit'
diu Rive
•his
п6s..
indicatos
he: 1:
BRAVE for ident
Al
¿ua:
i'*.
il antes
tini
4{er1ß1
ALVA
" L
vicies
:ilt
barth
ile
11503
Bairreion
in cones
Mecossals
0 0e: 5009154
SCarion
victos
iticu
---
## Page 9
14-00000
lei puente diegos correncia:
-a.1:1100:
tonto
:telle d1
sudore
1671'
11.
11110r.
Trr.linh.
intino
1?1
" 1:11:
•J:
ii?s
1-1!61
117
11::
tai'
ir,.
---
## Page 10
D7Og
That
Cust
shiela needintly idenrifiable
1'::
IN AS EIIO
19601anl
enlisari
cind
in tridg
2505.
chalin pilot.
sorted durin
Lizzi
Cant
middleasad
ii:
Xiia'
1R010Y° CN
idication lie irate eodei."
colonel by the apologe adled Lila?
iris participation
₫ the zavale.
---
## Page 11
coratode itale.
111
filc.i
Vil
111i7.
el concitate arm
1185.
rootetel
ille:i.
¡preliee:
abillatte
L'1/N
in i
in fil, d'ut tor
italed
l.::
niti appil
itt
dio proces
111
---
## Page 12
81..68:6e1
i ile::
"•I412ti6;]
hel mar ca chl00%s1
---
## Page 13
mlieip o10 allicud bisiie
---
## Page 14
haiti
119.
111i1.
•* *;
drile in
11:19
13i
ixi"
solit: i.
•"!:
lilian
і1 1e
111:'*2
migarlore"
Whis
-Pilareal
ill'ri
÷1143
iNvi
"O!:
AlD.
Laoy
Mitad
Curlser
Lisen
d
llorarios" 111..
Кито ни 11..1.
st
indicatir colit
1120)
1162.
1d01"
Ст ста днІ.
---
## Page 15
"Авокани
l'i:
Donald
vil.
гладі-і÷?
¿ness dil allie '1:
100!
1130 3NE
11!211
granner-el
L04÷4-2
110d.C.:
slogar in Clacy
1 11
THE 100110
1? 81. 416.11108,0;
• 10
11119.0111-11.1
tatter si
1.:e.
d°OJ6,N':
Leanne Bad 11161
1111:
Lily
no on
Litt's
14188
Kennedy and
Paa dated
tar:
JAVI
PiD and Che poisonel:
1811.11110
Lie bro
be of any
QUS
UndER CA.
aceral to largiciane
Sociate cl
•lle
the A sency participation
celia, a latt
numbie be
directly involved vili- both
---
## Page 16
i".
•1%
10e1.219
siste.
121"
Hele:
parteci
sto;
Lipoiler
Epiroslias
I5711
E]?"
#i1168
1i!
14:10911.
t•*1
ci i
i:;
лlab.е°.i8..:
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | docid-32303130.pdf | 124-10283-10142 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 8/11/61 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 92-2918-2ND NR 100 | DIRECTOR, FBI | SAC, PG | 2 | FBI | HQ | 02/28/2018 | 2 | ## Page 1
JFK Assassination System
Identification Form
Agency Information
Date:
5/28/201
AGENCY:
RECORD NUMBER :
RECORD SERIES:
FBI
124-10283-10142
HQ
AGENCY FILE NUMBER :
92-2918-2ND NR 100
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM:
TO:
TITLE :
SAC, PG
DIRECTOR, FBI
DATE: 08/11/1961
PAGES:
2
SUBJECTS :
[Restricted]
DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION:
Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS :
4
CURRENT STATUS :
Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 09/11/1998
OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE
COMMENTS :
v9.1
DocId: 32303130
Page 1
7
---
## Page 2
COMGUNICAMORS DEVON
AVO 1:1196
Cita
Mr BrOL
fir. Moles
Mr. Etonea..
IS::
Funera
Mr, Aretter
Me. Jeccam
Mise Guate
URGENT. 8-11-51:
3-35
PM NP
TO, DIRECTOR, FBI -92-2914--92-2918
FROM, SAC,. PITISBURSH 92-2-36--92-228
2-P
GABRIEL MANNARINO, AKA, ARO, SAMUEL MANNARINO, AKA, AR. ON
EIGHT ELEVEN INSTANT, DJ ATTORNEY WILLIAM KEHOE TELEPHONICALL!
CONTACTED SA THOMAS GO FORSYTH III FROM MIAMI, FLA. HE SAID
HE AND DJ ATTORNEY KENNY INTERVIEWED JOSEPH RO MEROLA PAST TWO
DAYS IN MIAMI AND FELT MEROLA WAS: COOPERATING RE MANNARINOS.
MEROLA SAID WILL NOT TESTIFY. KEHOE HAD MEROLA: AGREE TO INTERVIEW
BY BUAGENTS BUT MEROLA WILL NOT TALK WITH AGENTS OF MIAMI OFFICE,
WILL NOT COME TO PITTSBURGH AND INSISTS DJ ATTORNEY KENNY BE
PRESENT DURING INTERVIEW. MEROLA AGREEABLE TO INTERVIEW IN MIAMI
BY SA JOHN SO PORTELLA, WITH WHOM HE HAS AT LEAST A SURFACE
FRIENDLY RELATIONSHIP, AND SA FORSYTH WHO IS HANDLING MANNARINO
INVESTIGATIONS, KEHOE ASKED IF SAS PORTELLA AND FORSYTH COULD
COME TO MIAMI ON AUGUST FOURTEEN NEXT FOR INTERVIEW AND WAS
ADVISED HE SHOULD MAKE REQUEST THROUGH NORMAL CHANNELS. KEHOE
SAID HE WOULD CALL AAG SILBERLING AT DU AND HAVE HIM MAKE
REQUEST OF BUREAU. KEHOE FEELS THAT SINCE SAS PORTELLA AND
FORSYTH ARE MORE FAMILIAR THAN HE WITH ACTIVITIES AND ASSOCIATES 1961
2- 2918-
NOT RECORDE
167 AUG 17 1964
ORIGINAL COPT
code. is
66 AUG 221961
DocId: 32303130 Page 2
---
## Page 3
PAGE TWO
MOF MANNARINOS AND OF MEROLA: THEY CAN CONDUCT A MORE PENETRATIVE
QUESTIONING OF MEROLA. FORSYTH AND PORTELLA WILL TAKE NO
ACTION VACBO
END ACK PPSL
3-38 PM OK FBI WA WS
DISC
wei:
yne 11 3 3064381
indee indicate
DocId: 32303130 Page 3
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10164-10086.pdf | 104-10164-10086 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 01/29/1962 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CHIEF CI/OA | CHIEF WH | ORLANDO BOSCH AVILA TOOK EXTREMELY CRITICAL VIEW OF KUBARK POLICY AND PERSONNEL. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-3 : F15 : 1998.01.06.16:05:58:700107 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10164-10086
89 Juanry 1962
SORTECT
8 Orlando BOSCH AvlIa
vuten ant 8I ehrela condusted en the above sund
Bebfeet soval that on 20 My 1066, an atvertisemt appene
whieh the Dubjeet took an trenty mitten vor ef AT
#Are 1004890
Dul Ano no mont to tram Cita do Cantro himals.
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
: Do Not Reproduce
Motetbuttent
403-299099
JAN/mon
SECRET
92033
I/BR
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10250-10023.pdf | 104-10250-10023 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 1/2/76 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | ONE CALVIN WILSON HICKS IS A 51 YEAR OLD. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK43 : F10 : 20040322-1061493 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10250-10023
A RETURNTO CIA
0-676323
Background Use Only
DOợNg Beast
300%
HICKS, Cạlvin MisOn - 0-43133:-
SR
be identical to
one Cal to vison Bicke Era 51 year old ho may OF
subject's social reference
may
. not
7708
2000
One Hicks,
10207 Forest Avenue, Fairfax,
was a former GS-13 DDO/SOD Agency employee from 1950 untli
disability retirement on 31 December 1974,
One Hicks vas a former Military Staff Agent from 1955 to 1958.
NOTE:
Memorandun
contacted this Agency on 15 May 19
Le way o7 indicates thirone Hioker
197S regarding
U.s, merchant vessel Mayaguez
recently returned
Pile contains the following flag sheets:
JMARC
-Tebruary 1968 TET Offensive.
2 POETCH 0. 32883
Jan. 1976
Z/PV
RJB: ds
SEORET
1
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10216-10380.pdf | 104-10216-10380 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 9/3/65 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | WITHHELD | NOTE: TELEPHONE CALL FROM AMWHIP | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-51 : F7 : 1998.05.30.10:13:05:560109 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10216-10380
3566-1-65
lo CA 3 Serteabor 1955 at a90d 1030 Alisai, 1 caio: 16 188
tea Sow Fork to nay that ho indidd iais fio: 14a--e" esgist inat
to neo A/1 1n Sureza, le sald there sas 10 15d=a
nashed to seo his aborto
Repres
•2o d/i addos that SAPATO Mas alao foine :e suropa el to dese ti0o.
He thought MANso Me rould go te Italy bi had no ether dataile
=1111bk
Mos trip mas connected rith that of
InLESIAS®
3o all eleo sentionad that Herzes seld 15' tre "sas ai to sorical"
(NCASI/I) Wa8 011-20 elaborattes.
Lo In reply to a query about ury furthar contersaliene 116h 12A3H/2
intadild, 1/1 sold he kad telled to & e tocas no 2it00 with klei
2'ued sha AcAsA mas tatararted 10 "the das 020 141r8"-100.
gottlog, neney frus d/do
So A/2 aria bo non plana lo Louro Ser Puerto Bico da buBlsosa abert
l septenbar and that he will call no en his sutura durias tha met of
5 Septomber.
He ot11l plana to depart for Europe about I5 Sopterbere
KINS
10/.
refases e sete acredita.
3 septilq65
Amlash-1.I
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10216-10011.pdf | 104-10216-10011 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 8/9/74 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | COMPUTER PRINT OUT: CROSS REF TO THE 21 FILE CITED UNDER LEFT MARGIN. | 4 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-51 : F10 : 1998.04.21.17:56:25:356102 : | 4 | ## Page 1
104-10216-10011
1600
X-REF • SHEET
S-E-C-R-E-T
DATE
09/08174
2010252234
SYMAA NUMBER
DER -547988 HuS
HM1M-28671 J08
DOSA-DAIE
08 MAY 74
08 MAY 74
DOGA FILED IN
019-006-156/07
019-006-156107
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT (SI
ARE CROSS REFERENCED
TO THE 201 FILE CITED UNDER LEFT MARGIN
FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LOCATION
THE FILE CONTAINING THE RECORO COPY DOCUMENT.
CALL FILES SECTION, EXTENSION 4127•
S-E-C-R-E-T
E2
IMPDET CL. BY 054979
FILE IN 201-0252234
---
## Page 2
14-00000
SECRET.
CO DOCUMENT EXTRACT
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201
DOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANDTHER OFFICIAL DO FILE•
PERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT ...THE DOCU
MENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED
INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED
FROM IP/FILES.
CUBELA, ROLANDO
201-0252234
SEXM
201-0924584
27881
OT MAY .74
AKA ROBERTO, KICKED CÜT OF INTELL CA 68, PER
SUB-J
201-0924584°
DATE 18 JUL 74
09142622
20r-252234
SEGRET
E2 IMPDEI C6_BY 054979
soniara
---
## Page 3
14-00000
1139109279591
X- REF.
SHEET
SE-C-R-E-T
DATE 19/07/7%
X-REE...
201-0252234
DIR -547988
DOGA DALE
08 MAY 74
DOSA FILED IN
201-0924584
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTIS ARE CROSS REFERENCED
TO THE LOL
FILE CITED UNDER LEFT MARGIN•
FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LOCATION OF
THE FILE CONTAINING THE RECORD COPY DOCUMENT
CALL FILES
SECTION, EXTENSION 4127
S-E-CR-E-T
EZ iMPDET CL BY 054979
FILE IN
(201-0252234
wet in fiania has g
---
## Page 4
A +354-8437775 tadt, sas if to get us a
X-REF. SHEET
S"E-C-R-E-T
DATE
26/07/74
A-BEER
201-0252234
SYMB - NUMBEB
WMIM-2167I
DOG. DAIE
O8 MAY T4
DOC. ELLED IN
201-0924584
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTIST
ARE CROSS REFERENCED
TO THE
201 FILE CITED UNDER LEFT
MARGIN.
FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LOCATION
OF
THE FILE CONTAINING THE RECORD COPY
DOCUMENT,
CALL FILES SECTION, EXTENSION
4127.
27881
F2 IMPDET-19040054978
FILE IN 201-0252234
22-0:22
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10170-10109.pdf | 104-10170-10109 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 01/01/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | CIA FILE ON AMERICAN VOLUNTEER GROUP. | 76 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-25 : F17 : 1998.02.08.09:33:41:733107 : NBR | 76 | ## Page 1
104-10170-10109
Office of Crison:
Report diade At:
Subjec falsivas
FIRERARID NSUD ANN
Classification:
folerence:
23 Februmsy 1931
7x-2891
ried Cong
B5/037 4 44082
Stanis:
Nevert YATBO dated 13 Men, 1015 entitled ver a(r)
1s roquested by tuning, the follariny as funisel by tsa members of Alr
ground forens pasources and rechateal stuff.
The Arst source, M/Sgt. Farry sney states Chrt Newarm's Mrst nig la
PAMED,
so was bom and edicted in emany.
Inay fromertly nentioned
the to of atreation he reedy ander the vernons and also tha sethods
of instructions.
Sate lives sald thet Nough uns a mechande with the ArO
prior to entoring the 1.5. 1oy-
Die to his work with the 17T, ISMAN 1a
a close friend of reneral ChoraTE:
po la a quiet follon and rary solden
mtare into concersation. He is bald die to trome.
The second nowce, tr. Iris war, stalenths fIT tasedlei fro
normany and has been in Chira for a long time,
prior to jainin the avo, ba
was an enginer. Accerding tour. "Rut, Neuman retar gorassed any
oolfiloal sentiments.
He 15 a mulet fallou and seldos erzages anyone in
corversation
The source also states tint he nover heard feuan mention
his fantly relations.
TADE TINTED Y EADS:
Al runnings.
This case is considend to be clos d at razing.
The furing
office say obtsin further inforsation fra
other fellos coldlirg of the Alr
prond forces resorce and" chrtea? sinfl
Distribution:
12 = Washington, DoCo
I sero
I : net. 202
2 - Funkas
1 - yuelyang
sheer in 213*ge.
---
## Page 2
MANCATORY AEVIEW OF CLASSEELED
COTOS OF CAN MAN RE ARCHES AND WATERNS
Ssivich
1/8/16
Date of Request
Name of Depository:
Address:
JOIN DE KENNEDY.
LIBRARY
360 TRAPMO ROAD -
WALTHAN, MA 02154.
Phone #: 617-223-1230
I hereby request mandatory revier of classified
material (see attached list) in the records/document collecti
of
National Securlly Files
(record group or coltection)
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 11652,
Section 5 (c).
Name of Requestor:
Address:
Richard D: Mahoney
4019 S. Mill Ave.
Tempo, Ariz: 95282
Phone #:
---
## Page 3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DECKERSE
National Aichie's and Records Service
Martingon, DC 20109
In reply refer toi
1LK-76-260
APR: 1 9 578
E- 76-124
Mr. Gune F. WUlson
Information and Privacy Coorilnator
Certral Intelligraco Agcacy
Warrington, Do 2U5os
Dear Mro Wilson:
Under che provistons of Seccion S(C), Executive Order 11652, 0 researcher
has requested the mindatory classification review ef che enclosed document(a)
fros the holdings of one of che Presidential libraries.
Enclosed are coptes
of the researchec'a request and a document list.
The identification of the
library file which concains the document(a) is given in the documene list.
it there is any question concerning this request, do not hesitate to contace
UB:
t.?+
Please revier the docment(s) and if they may be declausified, mark then
approprintely.
If a docucent
should remin classlfied in the interest of
national securiey, please provide us with che applicable exemption category
from Section S(B) of the Executive order and with a date or event when
autonatic declassificacion say be acconplished. We would appreciate retur
of the document copies wich your response.:
Sipcerely
EDWIN A. THOMPSON
Records Declassification Division
Enclosures
ArR 22
SECRET
INCLASSIEIED UPON REMOVAL UE ENCLOSUKES
Keep Freedom in Tom Fuisre Wih US. Savings Bonds
---
## Page 4
26 Janiary 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR:
ATTENTION
SUBJECT
REFERENCES
Chairman, Information Revlew Committee
Assistant for Information
E.0. 11652-FRichard D. Mahoney (E 76-124)
A.
Initlal Request dated 8 Janusry 1976.
B.
GSA Referral Letter w/att. dated
19. April 1976.
C. IPS Reply dated 26 July 1976.
D. Appeal Letter dated IS August 1976.
1:
Summary of Reconnendations: Sustain the initial
determination to deny the document in toto under prorision
S(B) (2) of E.0. I1652, as amended. Add provision 5(B) (3).
2.
Background:
On 8 January 1976, Mr. Richard D. Mahoney
requested a mandatory review of two classified CIA
documents under provisions of Executive Order 11652
Section S(C).
The documents were in custody of
the National Archives and Records Service (NARS)
in the John F. Kennedy Library.
b:
On. 19. April 1976, the NARS referred Mr:
Mahoney's request with copies of the documents to
CIA.
The Agency was asked to review the documents.
If declassified, they were to be marker appropriately.
FZ IMPDET
CL BY 012170
CONFIDENTIAL When
Detached From
Allachments
SECRET
---
## Page 5
SECRET
If they remained classified, the Agency was
requested to cite the applicable exemption
category from Section S(R) of the F.C.
and
a date when automnite declassification may be
accomplished. They requested that the copies
of the documents be returned with the Agency's
response.
On 26 July 1976, I8S wrote to the
NARS and returned
copies of the documents.
Both documents were found to require continued classi
Cication under E.0. 11657 Section 5(B) However, a
sanitized vorsion of Item el as found possible
and was enclosed. NARS Could adrise requester
of his right to appeal directly to ClA.
ad. On 15 August 1976, Mr. Mahoney wrote
to the ClA and appealed the decision to with-
hold from declassification Item 12 of his
request.
3. Recommendations:
Tih R-? contains TDCSDB 3/657,851 dated
12. November: 1963.
During the initial.
revicw, the
document was denied in toro to requester under
provision S(R) (2) of E.Q. 11652, as amended:
The
document is. based on NCL-1832 dated 10 November
1963.
I recommend that the initial determination
to deny the document to the requester in toto
under provision 5(B) (2) of E.O. 11652
be
sustained and that provision s(R)is) of e.o.
as amended,
11652
now be applied.
The information is .from
¿ sensitive, source with unique access to a poli.
tical leader.
.If
the infornation
cause embarrassment to the
released united States Govern
could
ment and exacerbate relations with a friendly
foreign government.
b.
During the DDO appeals revier, a classifi
cation review was conducted. The document is
properly classified and properly marked in accordance
with the provisions. of E.0. 11652
• as amended.
Due to the sensitivitv of the subiect matter, a
meaningful
sanitization cannot he made.
CONFIDENTIAL When
D:19 hed From
Attachments
SECRET
---
## Page 6
SECRET
recosmendat ions.
OGC has nor yet concurred in these
DO Appeals Officer
Attachments:
Tab A • References A-D
Tab B = TDCSDB: 3/657,851
COORDINATION
C/AF/PLAYS
DATE
CONFIDENTIAL When
Detached From
Allachments
SECRET
---
## Page 7
Append
E 76-13.46
arli
els
19 1•19:: $032191192
Sena
F.
infurtation
trivncy
2090l.aa:2=
control Intolllsence faturd
r.?.
20505
71r:
pray: jo.5
Joccent
2 or 82x
^6-43
Inca docunint,
SInce I dO L05 110:r
perition
tr.at
0:1? y
Feline beat or peera?
the sensitlilty of this
rel.asel
Ir sanitleed
fort.:
11?09
1312956
ter?::
bank you for your sosillerat
Fearing fros yod.
are conni
:11:14%.:
5111090-
Rill Syste
---
## Page 8
UNITED STATES or
AMERICA
GENEVAL SERVICES AOMINISTRATION
National Archives and Records Seruice
Washing:on, DC. 20108.
In reply refer to:
NP.K-76-321
WAY 1 0 11/8
Mr. Gone F. Wilson
Intonation
and Prisey Coordinator
Control Intelligence Agoney
Nashirgion, DC 20505
• Dear Me. Wilson:.
106
E 76-150
Under the provistons of scution 560), Frecutive Oider 11652, is rescarchos
lia regreated the mandatory classification coview of the enclosed document(s)
from the Boldloge of one of the Presiduitial librarles.
Fnelosed are coples
of the remare hod's
request and a document list.
The Ironetfleation
of the
Libracy file which contains the documont(3) 11 elven in
the document list.
Te thore lo any preston concerning chts request, do not healtate to concret
11:9 *
Plates color the dewarailed did le thig my ie declassfiled, mark chen
appropriately.
IF i document
Rould rent stamiried in the Interest of
masonal seruelly, plore provide no bich the applleable exenpelon category
from Soution 5(3) 0f Cho Piccutive order and wich a date or event when
auromotic.diclassffication my heaccouplished. Wa would appreciate seturn
of the dooment coples with jour temponse.
sinnerala
Director
roveda Doclassification Division
linclosures
Fax 19
1 24 PH'76
CP
Y CLASSINTED WAYS
70Ar.
Mtcro.caes
---
## Page 9
•DOX DE THE NATION ARCHES ARD RECORD: CERV EF
1/8/16
Date ne Request.
Address: 230 310020 2010
VALELAX, HA 0215'
lone 4: 611-223.1220
I hercoy request
mandatory. covior of classified
mlourial one ditched
Tist) in the cocords/docent collections
MOLOTAGS QUNEY 23
(r coM coup or cortcction)
1xe0t?:
ce will the movision do mortive Oeder 17052,
Wene of Remberior:
• 180955:
Fione :
Richard boyle Baloney
Генре, Arizon 85282
---
## Page 10
rr0d 5:
Ex22nis
1
CONGIDENCEAL
SECRaC
TOP SECRET
Unmarked (Dut
pussihly ilossiried)
Jac2o
5
*,------==
•13
Polal. ClassiCied
Unclessieled AcLachnenes
(for information only
3
18
: 1.03
1/1.3/63
!1r1!9.3
Desoription (identiCication, 2bJ:b):*
SC No. 00302/&3B:
"signiricanos or
PTC-African
esmolation Agracmont"
dennis
op doroch Dirioinle oit Feench Activities
in Block Alejen"
OCT 4o. 2375/63:
"Sub jeet:
African
Renetions
to US
Positiona
Comeil
in Security
Debatas on Porsuguose Territories
and South Africa"
Pores
7
tion
S
C
ior archivist:
Documento fron ESP:CO:Africs, 8/63-11/63, Bo% 3
---
## Page 11
MEMORADS FOR: Chairman, Inforantion eries Cooters
ATTENTION
50B68
NIFERENCE
Executivo Ordor 11062
Appert--
kichard
hoyle Bahotry (i
76-150)
:. Initial Request fron bars dated
100 Miy
1970 with arteriounts.
B. l'S Reply do BaRs died 21 dold
1970.
C. Appril better, 2i Septerber 1976.
1.
Summary
determination
Suspin the initivi
in tuto
TDCShl1/660,?90,
?!1)
incolligence robart
oriinated he taris Stalion dated
19 Soptonher
liod under excoption
Ordor (1.0.) 11652, and add the claim or F(l(ü) oF
1. 0. 11052.
?.
Backxrosa!
il.
Richard Doyle Makoney, i neaber
at the puttie
who is idmiriod a i
initiatol
Olt
§ January 1974
ti:rough
the
Kom dl library
a mandator rorion of TheSil- 3/066
,:0 to eccordaned
with the provision: of 1.0. 11052
Section "(C).
This request
for revior was
romarded to the via tho
National lochiros and Records Gorice CARE on
10 May 1976.
I respondod to 1Al5 on 20 mine 1976
Among other things, Cid denied in tote tocsor
wich was Item Da on the Niks roquesi, ou
the ground of Section E(B) (2) of lan. 11634.
The
1:2
IMPORT
101 Bx 012171
---
## Page 12
SCRET
reply stared that the document had tó remain
Massified indefinitely
in order to protect
intelligence sources and muthods, and stated
that release of segregable portions has not
feasible.
This was based upon a classification
review by a Anomiedicable officer
dited at May 1976.
Mr. Richard Doyle Mahoney appealed this
determination directly to It'S in a letter dated
September 1976.
He specifically asked if
it nould not be possible to release a sanitized
version of the document without jcopardizing
national security.
3.
Recommendations:
detalied recommendations.
See the Appeals Roview Forms for specific
A second classification revier was requested
ly DOO/ISS/PICG.
The second
revior was conducted
on TDCSUB-3/656,740 on 22. Neconher 1076 by Furope
Division, which
decided to retain the classification
at Scurot in accordance with F.o. 11652. Europe
Division wimmined mier rirlow that there bere
foreign policy and liaison sonsitivities which
precluded dongrading TDCSD -3/056,180, 0r
sterilizing the document and releasing portions
thorcof. at this time.
- 2 -
Data hed From
Atlachiments
---
## Page 13
it was
To touris
informian in the doctacht tort
scurity.
in
disclose de that incontion 102d
fact he filely do point the linger of duipirit
i a relaliyal saall doop or pricelial courers,
one of thou is pourer.
Fallen lo progres
this
source would in toon jeopardies Con rotations
with
carront aid loture sources.
officer rote nith
this position.
Out: his n0l get concuire in
theic rocommentations.
Arischients:
Reference's A.C
47:1.
Full Teal of them /665.71
COORDINATION:
X EUR/EXO
DATE
7 Jan 77
---
## Page 14
14-00001
€-76-150
NIK: 70-321
StanDar 22, 1975
Inforsation Rovior Coralitos
d/o Gias Fo lilson
Infomeatlon and Policy Conninator
£ 76-150
Madalagton, DoCo 20505
Due infamirilon Roslow Coralitags
Walso tho prordulons of Macitira Cider 11552, I tould Ills to
appeal dha ClAls doolsion
thoroof Man bolng duclasairlado 114. - 76-311.
As 193 Agoroy his dons alth sono sany of i declassifleation
riguests, todd 1t not bo possiblo to plougo a sunlitial version os tha
dosimant withort jropardistng national socurity?
I loss turned la racoiulns your roply and mut you for your
comilaration of this and Frovious -parls.
Sineuralya
Telesh
Richard Doyle Mahonay
joiri Fo
Yanna library
330 Trapnlo Road
inlthar, Masso 02154
31.:
---
## Page 15
14-00001
1: 25331
86 Best 6
000010888841
BIP LOTES COPIOS
TON 6068 (sONA)
META CH DE BRICA FOISAS
5-25331
2073
20.c0H
P 31
Miniss
GONTIDEESIAY
---
## Page 16
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 17
MDENTAL
31 December 1975
MEMIORANDUM POR:
Chlof, Information and Privacy Statt
SUBJECT
REFERENCE
F7S-4057
The FBI: forwarded for our terler two documents
Release of these docunents
(b) (3)(a) and (b) (6) POIA.
(SC B0C5 10C5 516/005150 Pd April 1971.5
Charles A. Briggs
Chiof, Servicos Staff
E2. IMPDET
CL
BY 0012176
---
## Page 18
Administrative - Internal Use
SAl
4. November 1975
MENORANDUM FOR: Chief, Information and Privncy Staff
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
Request No. 75-4057
Subject.
This Directorate does maintain an official file on
A review of this file and other records of this
Directorate reveal the following information identifiable
with requester.
Please forward these document
Seven documents originating with the FBI.
descriptions to the
so they can correspond directly with the requester.
(1) •
subject:
Date:
Vencercmos Brigade
7 January 1970
Origin of Report: Washington, D.C.
No Bureau File Number or Field File
Number provided.
(2) .
Subject:
Date:
16 June 1970
Origin:: Washington; D.C.
No Bureau File Number of Field File
Number provided.
(3).
Subject:
Date:
12. June 1970
Committee of Returned Volunteers
Origin:
New York City
File Number: 100-447724
(4) •
Subject:
Date:
30
Origin:
Jeptemder 1970
No
Washington, D.C.
Bureau
File Number or
Number
Field File
provided.
(5).
Subject:
Date:
27 AprIl 1971
Origin:
Washington,
D.C.
File Number:
100-47256
Administrative - Internal Lsa
---
## Page 19
@ministralive - Internal üse
(6) ÷
Subject:
Cate:
30 Lvare Tr. 4
Origin:
Washincion
D.C.
•File Number:
100-47256
222s
(7).
Subject:
Date:
-12
FECT TITT
Origin: Washington, D.C.
No Bureau File Number or Fleld File
Sumber provided.
D: One INS report entitled "Sugar Cane Cutters
Returning from Cuba," dated 29 April 1970, originating
in Portland, Maine.
zation
Service so they can correspond directly with
the requester.
c.
Three documents originating with this Agency,
of which sanitized versions are attached.
Further
descriptions are as follows:
(1). Name Trace Request dated 12 November
1968,
exempt per (b) (3)(a) (sources and methods),
(b) (6) (privacy) and (b) (1) (properly classified) of
the Frcedom of Information Act, as amonded.
(2).
Memorandum dated 21 November 1968,
exempt per (b)(5) (b) (CIA Act of 1949) and (b) (1)
(properly classified) of the Frecdom of Information
Act, as
amended.
Cable dated 20 February 1970, exempe
(b) (3) (b) (CIA Act of 1949) and (b) (1) (properly
classified) of the Freedom of Information Act,
amended,
Charles A.
Briggs
Chief,
Services
Staff
Administrative - Internal Use Only
- 2-
---
## Page 20
Jit 28
/ 27 AM '75
22 July, 1975
1101 Pine S
Philadelphia, Pi. 19104
Irbort S. Young
Coordinator, Freedom of Information Act
CIA
Washington, D.C. 20505
IRS 75-4057
Dear Hobert Young
I am writing pursuant to the Freeíon of Information Act, 9 U.S. C. Sec. 552, et suq.,
to request that you provide me with any ind all records, documents, memoranda,
letters and any information of any type or kind and in any form concerning me that is
on file, in the possession of, accessible ta,
or maintained by your agercy. If for
any reason you decide not to foriard to me any of the Information that I have hereby
requested, I further request that you identity the nature of the information withheld
and the roasons for your action,
I ask you to waive any fees according to the Act which permits it when the request
"is in the public interest because furishing the information can be considered as
primarily benefiting the pablis.". I think this is the casc.
As provided in the amended Act, I espeet to receive a reply within 10 working days.
Sincerelie
---
## Page 21
SEUNLI
17 Ncrember 1976
NEMORANDUM FOR: Chairaan, Information Review Committee
ATTENTION
Mr. H. G. Bean, Assistunt for Information
SUBJECT
FOIA Appeal
REFERENCES
A.
Initial Request dated 22 July 1975.
IPS Reply dated 19 March 1976.
C. Appeal Letter Received 26 April 1976.
1. Summary of Recoamendations:
a .
Sustain initial determination to deny in toto
to requester to DO originated documents under
exemptions (b) (1), (b) (3), and (b1(6) of FOIA.
Remove
(b) (6)
fron one document;
add creapcion (b)(2) to
both Jocuments.. iTabs B-S and 8-6).
Release additional inforzation in three
originated docucents previously released in
sanitized form--excised portions exempted under (b) (1),
priate.
Correct the names of the deciding officials
in the appeal response to requesier.
Advise
requester that docunent B-5 super-
cedes
document B-o and contains the exact same
information.
IPS advise FBI. that document B-5 supercedes
document B-d and shat the latter should be destroyed
to avoid duplicate referrals in the future.
Correct dates on documents 8-5 and 6.
E: IMPDET
CL BY 012170
SECRET
CONFIOENTIAL When
Beta-hed From
Machments
---
## Page 22
SECRET
2. Background:
On 22 July 1975
to ClA and requested all and any antormation con-
cerning her maintained by CIA under the FOIA.
She provided some biographic information and asked
that any fees be waived.
b. On 15 Decenber 1975, IPS/DDA advised DDO
Thad been
C.
On 19 March 1976, IPS wrote to
and enclosed sanitized versions of four documents,
three of which were Do documents.
Deletions had
iven made under (b) (1),
(b) (3),
and (b) (6) of the
FOIA.
iwo additional DuO documents (those referred
by the FBI) were denied in toto under the
sane
exemptions.
The exemptions vere explained, the
denying officials were identified by name, and
was advised of her right to appeal.
was also advised that FBI and
INS ori-
ginated material was being referred to the FBI and
INS for their direct response to her request.
When IpS listed the four documents. they
droneously listed the Deputy Director of Security
as denying
document 1 and Chief, Services Staff
as responsible
for documents 2
3, 4, 5,
and 6.
In fact, the Deputy Director
of security was the
denying official of document & and Chief,
Services
Staff for documents 1, 2
3,
5,
and 6.
OGC should
point out and correct this error in their letter
to requesterl.
d.
In an
undetal torter received by CIA on
26 April 10 subsectaon (a) (6) of the forA.
appealed the decisions
pursuant
3.
Reconnendations:
Tabs B-1 thru B-3,
B-S, and B-d contain the
documents constituting the DDO
appeals
refer to these tabs
for my recommendations concerning
individual documents.
Z
SECRET
CONFIDENTIAL When
Polached From
Atiachments
---
## Page 23
SECRET
b.
As stated in Paragraph ic above, 1
recommend that OGC,
in their lotter to requester,
correct the previous error in identifying the
dcciding officials.
c.
Document B-6 is a CSC! chat transmits an
accumulative machine listing to the FBI.
document is updated periodically and previous
listings shuuld be destroyed.
Document B-S
the updated and final machine listing for 1970
and superceded document B-6 which
been destroyed.
I recommend that OGC advise
requester that document B-S supercedes document
B-o and contained the exact sire information.
further recommend that IPS dras this matter to
the attention
FBI so future duplicate
referrals may be avoided.
d.
A classification revier of the five documents
listed in Tab B has been conducred.
are properly marked and properly classified in
accordance with Executive Order 11652, as anended.
All non-exempt information has boen identified
and recommended
for release to roquester.
The FBI and INS documents pertaining to
Subject located in DDO
files have been referred in
writing to the respoctive agencies for their direct
response to requester.
(See Tab C).
of OGC has concurred in these
4.
• recommendattons.
DDO Appeals Officer
Attachments:
Tab A = References A-C
Tab B = Documents
Tab C = NIS & FRI
B1, B2, B3,BS, and 66
Referral Letters
SECRET
CONFIDENTIAL When
sia hed From
Attachments
---
## Page 24
king Copy
Gene F. Wilson
Information and Privacy Coordinator
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C.
20505
Dear Gene Wilson,
•On 23 March, 1976 I received
some matorial on myself from your files
which only partially answored my request for information.
Your letter
Indicated that an appeal should he directed to you.
This lotter
consitutes that appeal pursuant to subsection (a) (6) of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) .
As provided for in the dee, I will expect to receive a reply within 20 working
days.
Sinccrely,
ArR 26
7 55 AH '76
---
## Page 25
14-00000
0 091
18 April 1977
NENOR IN DUM FOR:
FRON
SUBJECT
REFERENCE
Chief, Information and Privacy Staff
Chief, ISS/Policy and Information
Coordination Group
American Voluntcer Group: American
Voluntary Guerrillas: Alternate
Voluntary Government; requested by
Terry Catchpole
Request No. F-77-147
Subject organizations have been checked with all components
that night have an interest.or a record. The search revealed no
records in this Directorate pertaining to subject organizations.
15
CONRDEVTAL
---
## Page 26
F-77-147 JF. (pls vick)
CODUO OU
70.097
288$68.0900
March 7, 1917
Log/F
sient
rcedom of Information Coordinator
contral Intelligence Agency
l'ashington, D.C.
Hear Sir.
This 19 a request under the Freedom of Information Act as amended (5U,S.C.-
lection 552) •
Briefly, my request is for information that may be in your files pertaining
o a U.S. paramilitary organizntion known varlously as the American Volunteer
Viroup, American Voluntary Guerrillas or Alternate Voluntary Government (all AVG).
As you know, the amended Freedom of Inforsation Act provides that if
parts of a filé are exempt from release,
"reasonably segregable" portions shall
be provided. I therefore request that, if you determine that some of the
requested information is exempt, you provide de lmediately with the Information
1. hat can be mde available.
Of course, I reserve my right to appeal any such
decisione pertaining to
"exempt" material.
I am prepared to pay reasonable costs for locating this information.
DRO
seR?
lerrel
Terry (Catchpole,
Managing Editor
---
## Page 27
CONCENTAL
10 May 1977
MEMORIVDUM FOR
FROM
SUBJECT
REFERENCE
Chief, Information and Privacy Staff
Chief, Policy and Insurmation Coordination Group.
Peter A. Schey Request
- Ku Klux Klan, et al,
at Camp
Pendleton, California
F 77-025*
The files of this Dircetorate have been scarched with
regard to the listed organizations' connection with Camp
Pendicton, California and the result is negative for each
organization.
CONFIDENTIAL
C2 INDET SI DULLIIDO
---
## Page 28
577-025 - iK
Pls acknowledge
LAIN OFFICES OF
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO, INC.
SOUTHEAST OFFICE
3O%0 INHERIAL AVENUE
SAN DIECO, CALMORNIA 92102
(784) 239-9137
January 13, 1977.
.t?
le win led
flat
if he parsists in
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Fort George G. Meade
Mid. 20755
CHIEF OF NAVAL CPERATIONS
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Washington D.C. 20350
Attn- OP-09318
DEFENSE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE
DS4A
Hashington D.C. 20301
NATIONAL SÉCURITY COUNCIL
Attn. Staff Secretary
Old Executive Office Building
washington D.C. 20506
PEDIRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U.S. DÉPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
'9 th
and Penn Ave. Ni
Washington D.C. 20535.
DIRECTOR
DEFENSE INTELLICENCE AGENCY
Attn: SC (FOIA)
Mashington D.C. 20303.
3e.
DIRECTORATE FOR FREEDOM OF INFORGATION
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Public Affairs)
Room 2C757. Pentagon,
Washington D.C. 20301
CIA FREEDOM OF INFORUATION COORDINATOR
CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCY AGENCY
Washington D.C. 20505
RE: FREEDOM OF INFORKATION REQUEST
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This is a
request under the Freedom of Information Act as
amended (5 U.S.C. S552).
He had "my file'
reguet
75-5938
JAw 17
35 PH '77
---
## Page 29
88.8!T.
Page 2 (continued)
an writing this letter on behalf of mysclf and
and Reporter Publications.
Pursuant to tne Frcedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C, $552;
as amended by Pub. L. 93-502, 88 Stat: 1561, we wish to
obtain access to and the opportunity
to copy the following
documents:
All directives, memoranda, letters, orders, reports.
memoranda of telephone on ether one hich eludie to treen
Camp Pendleton Parine Base, California:
a.
b..
Ku Klux Klan:
California Ku Klux Klan;
United Klans:
Knights of the Ku Klux Klan;
e
f.
United Klans of America;
Southern Ku Klux Klan;
White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan;
White. Brotherhcod;
United Klans of America Knights of the Ku Klux Klan:
Minutemen:
Secret Army Organization;
Christian Crusade Church;
American Rangers;
n.
Invisible Empire of the Ku Klux Klan;
Christian Defense League;
The National States Rights Party:
California Anti-Communist League;
Christian National Alliance;
American Volunteers Group:
Provisional Naticnal Government of the U.S.A.;
American Nazi Party:
v.
W.:
National Socialist White Peoples Party;
Leagion of Justice;
Operation Unicorn-And other similar groups.
2.
All directives,
memoranda, letters, orders, reports.
investigations, studies, or other records, including written
memoranda of telephone conversations, which relate to the
foundation,
existence, activities, operations, size, member-
ship or presence of any of the organizations named in No. I
above in the
United States Marine Corp.
3. All directives, letters, memoranda, orders, reports.
investigations. or other records which describe, analyze
or otherwise relate to rascism at Camp Pendleton Marine Base.
---
## Page 30
14-00000
Page 3 (continuc)
All directives, letters, memoranda, orders, reports,
investigations or other records which describe, analyze
or otherwise relate to rascism in the United States Marine
corp.
Since none of the statutory exonptions Erom the Freedon of
Information Act's
matidatory disclosure provision applies.
access to the requested records should be granted within
ten (10) working days. y
In the unlikely event, however, that access is denied to
any part of the requested records, please describe the
deleted material in detail and specify the statutory basis
for the denial as well as your reasons for believing that
the alleged
statutory justification exists in this casc.
Please also state your rcasons
discretionary power
to release the requested documents in
the public interest.
le also request that you waive any applicable fees since
disclosure will meet the statutory standard for such waiver
in that it would clearly be "in the public interest because
furnishing
the information can be considered
primarily
benefiting
the general public".
S U.S.C.A. $552(a) (4) (A).
Should ,any procedural problem arise as to this request,
please
call me (collect)
TRO: 229017
J0rst 70011
Attorney at Law
TERESA. ORTIZ
ROTARY PUBLIC - CALFORNIA
Princial Ollica, San D.aea Co. Call
My Commission Exp. Der. %, 1979
Tell 443199399773
PAS: pen-
Subscribed and sworn to before
me on January 14, 1977.
OTAR
мст Слі THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
---
## Page 31
LAN OFFICES OF
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO, INC.
SOUTHEAST OFFICE
3040 16:PERIAL AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CALIFONNIA 9Z10I
(784) 239-9837
January 13, 1977
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Fort George G. Heade
Md. 20755
CHIEF ON NAVAL OPERATIONS
DEPARTRIENT CF THE NAVY
Washington D.C. 20350
Aten. CP-09818
COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES MARINE CORP.
Department
of the Navy
Washington D.C. 20350
DEFENSE INVESTICATIVE SERVICE
DS4A
Washingtori D.C. 20301
NATICNAL SECURITY COUNCIL
Attn. Staff Secretary
Old Executive Office Building
Rashington D.C. 20506
FEDERAL SUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U.S. DEPARIMENT OF JUSTICE
9th and Penn.
Ave.
NW
Washington D.C. 20535
DIRECTOR
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Attn: SC. (FOIA)
Washington D.C. 20301
DIRECTORATE FOR FREEDO: OF INFORMIATION
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Public Affairs)
Roor 20757, Pentagon,
Washington
DC 20301
CIA FREEDO:1 OF INFORMATION COORDINATOR
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Washington D.C. 20505
RE: FREEDOM OF INECRIATION REQUEST
TO WHOM IT HAY CONCER':
if printro
an Ankate
Fallarina narenne and
---
## Page 32
Page 2 (continuca)
organizations:
illiam Bishop, 6202 Capestone, Dallas, Texas
Grenoiv Coffoc. 1521 wellstone Place, St. Louis, Mo.
Eddie Page, Jr., Bay Springs, Mississippi,
D.R. Hunter, 2715 Drewry Lane, North Carolina,
Ricky McGilvery, 6202 Capestone, Dallas, Texas
Willian Spencer: S1l Henry Place, High Point, N.C.
H. Fletcher, 2222 Superior, Detroit, Mich.
Clarence Capers. 209 Powder Mill Lane, Edgewater Park, Phil.
Anthony Matthews, 3904 E. 155th, Cleveland, Ohio
Carlton Goodlett, President, National Newspaper Publishers
Association - Black Press of America, 1366 Turk Street, San
Francisco, CA
94115°
Reporter Publications, 1366 Turk Street,
San Francisco, CA 94115.
Military Liw Office, National Lavyers Guild, San Francisco, CA.
Pursuant to the Freedom of Infornation Act, 5 U.S.C. 5552, as
amended by Pub. I. 93-502,
88 Stat. 1561,
they wish
to obtain
access to and the opportunity to copy the following documents:
All directives, memoranda, letters, orders, reports,
investigations, studies or other records, including written
memoranda of telephone conversations, which relate to the
formation, existence,
activities, operations, membership, size
or presence of any of
the following organizations at Camp.
Pendleton Marine Base, California:
=.
b.
C.
d.
f.
9.
Ku Klux Klan;
California Ku Klux Klan:
United Klans;
Knights of the Xu Klux Klan;
United Klans of America;
Southern Ku Klux Klan:
White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan;
White Brotherhood:
United Klans of Merica Knights of the Ku Klux Klan:
Minutemen:
Secret Army Organization:
Christian Crusade Church:
Averican Rangers;
Invisible Empire of the Ku Klux Klan;
Christian Defense League;
---
## Page 33
Page 3. (continued)
The National States Rights' Party;
california Anti-connunist Loague:
Christian National Alliance:
American Voluntcers Group;
•Provisional National Covernment of the U.s.n.g
American Nazi Party:
National Socialist White Peoples Party;
Leagion of Justice,
Operation Unicorn And other similar groups.
2. - All directives,
nemoranda, letters, orders, reports,
investigations, studies,
or other records, including written
memoranda of telephone
conversations, which relate to the
foundation, existence,.
activities, operations, size; member
ship or presence of any of the organizations named in No. 1
above in the United States Marine Corp
3:
All directives, letters, meroranda, orders, reports.
investigations.or other records
which describe,
analyze
or otherwise relate to rasciom at Camp Pendleton Marine Base.
All directives, letters,
menoranda, orders, reports,
investigations or other records which describe, analyze. or
otherwise relate to rascism in the United States Marine Corp.
Since "hone of the statutory exemptions from the Frcedom of
Information Act's mandatory disclosure provision applies,
access to the requested records should
be granted within ten
(10) working days.
In the unlikely event, however, that access is denied to any
part of the requested records, please describe the
deleted
material in detail and specify the statutory basis
for the
denial as well as your reasons for believing that the alleged
statutory justification exists in this case.
Plcase also state
your reasons for not invoking your discretionary power to
release the requested documents in the public interest.
We also request that you waive any applicable fees since
disclosure will meet the
statutory
standard for such waiver in
that it would clearly be
the public interest because
furnishing the information can be
considered as primarily
benefiting the general public".
5 U.S.C.A. $552(a) (4) (A).
Should any procedural problem arise as to this request, please
call me (collect)
so await vour progat reply.
Attorney at Law
---
## Page 34
10 March 1976
VENORANDUN FOR:
Chief, Information and Privacy Staff
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
A.
Request No: 75-4508
B.
OS Referral dated & Decemhor 1975
This Directorate mintains a filo on
The following paragraphs describe
no results or
a review
of this file and tho other record holdings of this
Mirectorato.
There are s1x FBI documonts identifiable to Mr.
Attached is a
list of the descriptivo
data for
those documonts that should be referrod to the FBI for
thetr dotermination.
The following documents may not be passod to Mr.
Document and Date
1 Cablo, 12 July 1970
& rispatch, 28 July 1970
I Dispatch, & August 1970
•Cable, 20 Fobrussy 1970
nispatch, 19 Play 970
fi Cable, In May 1972
Exemption
(6) (1) (11a1s0n), (b) (3);. (b)(6)
(D) (1), (b) (3), (0)(6)
E2
IMPDET
CL
BY 012170
---
## Page 35
The document referred to this Diroctorate by
the Offico of Security should bo returned to then for
their revier.
The document concerned is a list of names
of people who traveled to Cuba to cut sugar cane, dated
18 May 1973.
For tuther guidance on this 11$t,
please
see DDO/PIC memorandum,.
dated 5 March 1976 Subject:
Documents Rolating to the Vencoremos Brigade.
Chardos A.
BY 889
chiof, Services Staff
Attachment:
A/S
Cc:
OPS/ITC
LA
---
## Page 36
3 0) PN'75
Robere S. Young
roodon of Information Coonlinitor
entral Intelliganco Agercy
rington DO 20505
INS 75-4508
alor the provisions of 5 Use 552, tho Froudom of Information Act,
requost:
accoss to,
and copios of all flion and docimonts main
alrod by tho CIA rolating to aysolf.
sy photographs and fingorprint flles which you may have.
I, purchance, you rule that portlons of these files aro "roasonably
orrogable!"
I roquest copies of thu romnining material and roservo
ij right to appoal any such doletions.
is, perchanco, this roquast is dended in wholo or In part, ploase
nform me of tho appropriate appeals procodiro.
'I delotions are made, please cite the statutory justification for
rachi deloted itom.
: an submitting my full none, date and place of birth and Social
¡ocurity
Tumber.
proparod to pay a roasonable foe for the
reproduction of this matorial.
s required by 5 USC 552, I oreot to hoar from you within 10
sorking dayso
Sincoroly yours;
---
## Page 37
5 Parch 1976
BIENORANDUM FOR: Chiot, Information and Privacy Staff
SUBJECT:
Documents Reinting to the Vencerchos Brigade
1.
This Dircetorate is unablo to locate or to
acknovledgo origin of the following ruports contalned
In tho files of tho Offico of Sccurity:
Tho Venceremos Prigade a Report - J1
May 197001.
List of namos of Peoplo Who Travoled to
Cuba to Cut
Sugar Cano dated 18 May 1963.
thoroforo decline to rulo on the releascabilley
of thesé tro documents on FOIA and PA requosts,
and ask that these
documents not be roferred to
us for action.
From che nortions forwarded in connection with
specific requests, there lould appear to be no renson for
denying the inforantion.
He defor, however, to os for a
final. Judgenent.
DDO/PIC
EZ IMPDET
CL
BY 012170
CONFIDENTIAL
---
## Page 38
11174
27 October 1971
MEMORINDUS FOR: Chief, Information ind Privacy Staff (U)
FROM
Robert. l. Owen (U)
UDo Inforration kerior Officer
SUBJECT
REFERENCE
P-77-0140 (U)
(U)
A scarch of the DDO rocords systems has
pinduced nine documents whose recommended disposition
is as follen's:
b.
(U)
Six documents are denied in toto.
(Tab A, Document Nos. 1-6).
(U)
Document Nos." and & should be
referred
to
the FRI;
No.
and Document
9. should ho referred to the ..
Department of state. (Tab B)
Robert F. Owen (U)
Attachments:
a/s
cc: • ISS/1PG/SCB
(V)
ii.
ADMINISTRATIVE- INTERNAL USE ONLY
When Detached: from Attachments
1.?.
... 012170
SECRET
---
## Page 39
Central Intelliaeuce Agency
Washington, D.C. 20505
Dear People at the CJ.A.,.
My name is
I live at
I am requesting
under the Freedom of Information Act
all information pertaining to me in your
igency. files and records
purs trulyr
affirm that all in formation.
provided above pertaining to myself is correct.
On this
41 dan af January before
porsonally
appeared
ridicidn"
1 mento a are real did to ti
perdentid.
State of New York, Wyoming County
Commission Expires bisich 30, 1014
---
## Page 40
20 April 1976
MEMORANDUN FOR:
Chlof, Information and Privacy Staff
SUBJECT:
A Quaker Action Group
REFERENCE:
Request No. F. 76-211
A reviow of the filos of this Directorate re-
vealed the documents discussed below concerning Subject.
Documents which may
be released in their ontiraty
consist of twenty-four overt Items; copies attached.
(Documents 1-24)
One document dated July 1971 may not be released
t 1s exempt under (b)(1) and (b) (3) (liaison), FOIA.
: (Docúment 25)
momorandum datod 8 November 1976 (Document
26) consists entirely of a direct quote
from an FBI report
datod 30 May 1907, Washington; D..C.: Sublect: Protost
Activity In Washington, D. C.. Ry A Quaker Action Group
Beginning May 26, 1967; no file.
This report should be.
referred to the FBI for relesse.
In addition there are elghty-seven other FBI
documents which are not boing listed
sinco your offico has
advised that the FBI also has a roquest on Subject.
(Documents 27-114.)
Charles A.
Br18xs
Chiof, Services Staff
Attachments: NS
E2 IMPET
CL BY 012170
CONADENTIAL
---
## Page 41
Ris.
Young
Cleani Intelligence mine:
martial, D.C.
20505
F 76-211
Dear Sir:
This is a request unda= the Freedom of Information
rico, 5 V.5.c. 552,
we,
et. sed.,
on behalf of n quaker resion
the undersianed,
were the authorized
sificers at the time of the dissolution of the organtiation.
no request that you drovide us. with any and all records,
documents,
letters, or any other tyoe
of kind
of intormation concerning our
groug that is currently on
file, in possession of, or maintained by your agency.
The full name of the organization in d quater desion
It was also knon sy
initlals, dads.
crcantration var establlahod in 1905 and existed until
The main offica ves maintained at 20 south 1241
capes in Philadelphia, PA.
is for any raison you debormine nos to farcard to
w. and of the Informition tas
Na have boroby requested,
e mother request that you identify the nature of the
income mion silthheld and the reasons for your actions.
¿s you know.
the arosed de. ocanier you to reduce
du waive the foes 1E that
"Is In tho public interest
i mause furnishing the Information can bo considered as
primacily bonefiting
the oubiic."
this request olainly fits that caingory and ask you
wave any fees..
se providod fo= in the anenand hct, werill excast
to recolve.
a raoly within li days.
sincerely,
---
## Page 42
CONFIDENIA:
23 June 1976
NENORIADUN FOR: Chief, Infornation and Privacy Staff
FROM
Chirles M. Briggs
Chief, Services Staff
SURJECT
REFERENCE
for. "A Quaker Action
Group"
A. 0S Referral
R. Request No. F 76-211
The dispatch dited 18 April 1068, referred to this
Directorate by the Office of Security has heen revicwed.
Release of the document
is denied under
exemptions. (b) (1) and (b)(3) of the 1011.
Charles A. Briggs
CONFIDENTIAL
---
## Page 43
SECRET
29 September 1977
MENORANDUN FOR. Chairman, Infornation Review Committeo (U)
ATTENTION
SUBJECT
Mr. H. G. Bean, Assistant for Information (U)
COps 1P7e-2m0 ()
CIPS -F
REFERENCES
Initial Request Letter,
22 March 1976 (U)
B.
C.
IPS Response, 20 July 1976 (U)
Appeal Letter, 23 August 1976 (U)
1. (U) Summary of Recommendations:
Sustain initial denial in toto of two DDO documents
under exemptions (b) (1), (b) (3) and (b)(6), as applicable. :
(Tabs 3 and 4).
b.: Relcase portions of ten DDO documents found
during the appeals
review, citing exemptions (b)(1),
(D) (3) and (b)(G), is applicable, for the deletions.
(Tabs 5-14).
Deny in toto one DDO document located during the
appeals review.
citing exemptions
(b) (1), (b) (3) and
(b) (0) as the justification:
(Tab 15).
Rofer a list of 88 FBI Documents to the FBI for
review and direct response.
(Tab 16).
Refer one Department of the Army
document to them"
for review and direct response.
(Tab 17).
• f. Five NSA-originated items have been referred to NSA
for review.
(Tab 18).
CONFICENTIAL Whe
Detached From o
Attachments
SECRET
---
## Page 44
SECRET
2.
(U). Background:
2 ..
Subject submitted a request under FOlA, on
22 March 1976, for any and all
information the
held on "A Quaker Action Group"' also known as "AgAnC"
In the 20 July 1976 initial response, 24 newspaper
clippings
and one leaflet were released to him; two
documents were denied.
.D..
On 23 August 1976 Subject appealed,
requesting
that further information be relcased to him on
the group.
c. During
the appeals review ll additional documents
were located and are included in the
recommendations
below. These documents were not considered during the initial
review since
they were not considered to meet the criteria
"records" extant at that time and they contained onzy
incidental references to the subject of the roquest.
d.
During the appeals review we were unable to
identify any Air Force documents concerning the subject
of this request.
The requester should be told that this
was apparently an error.
During the appeals review we were unable to
identify any bepartment of State documents concerning
A Quaker Action Group.
possibly referred to
in the statiad cumponse, do no, and
concern A Quaker Action Group.
The requestor should be
inforned that this was also apparently an error.
3. (C) Recommendations:
My specific recommendations are shown on the
Appeals Review Form attached to each document.
A
classification review has been conducted and all documents
are considered properly classified and marked in accordance
b. I recommend that the two documents denied in toto
under the
initial review continue to be denied.
One of
them (Tab
3) could identify a still active and
sensitive
source.
The other (Tab 1)
was obtained
through a sensitive
operation conducted jointly by. American
German
authorities.
SECRET
---
## Page 45
C..
I reconnend that portions of ion additional
doctrents lointed during the appeals revier be rcleased
Exceptions (b)(1), (b)(3) and (D) (6) should he cited,
as arplicable, to the deniod portions:
Specific
recognendations on each of these documents is reflected
in the attached Appeals Revice Forms. (Tabs 5-14):
One additional document located during the
amcals revice should he denied
received from a foreign liaison service.
in tuto, since:
it wag
(Tab 15).
e.
88 FAT docurents located during the initial
revies, but not referred to the lal, should he referred
to the FBI
in triting for review ind direct response.
These documents are listed under Tab 16.
f.
One Department of the Army document should be
referred in writing to them
for revicw and direct response
The title paye: anc
a description of the document are
itanched. as
Tab li.
Fire
irs. for revich. (Tab 18).
items from NSA have been refered to them by
n.
scroral other documents turned up during both the
initiat revich and the appcals review should be considered
not responsive to the request since they rofer te
& hc
generic
term
"Quaders" hut not to
"A quater Arsion Group".
15
specified in the request. (Tao 1?).
4.
(il)
recommendatio
ns..
of O6C has. concurred in the above
Richard
Hagner
DDO Appeals Officer (U)
Atrachments:
Tab A -
Initial Letter
Tab 6. 1'S Response
Tab C
oneal Letter
Tabs 3-19
• See Revick Forms
COORDIVATION
FA/OEM<FOI
ISS/IPA/SCR
EUR/EXO
nex
DATE
211/12
30/9/27
30c722
SECAFT
---
## Page 46
pi..
16 99? 1975
ARDIORA:DOY FOR:
SURJECT:
REFERENCE:
Chief, Information lovier stast
Request An. 75-801
1. This Nonetorses naintains e personalley dossier
A roview rE
this file and other
records of this circetorate reveal tie folloring infor-
nailon pertinent to subject:
A few FBI documents, tich are excluded
under 1900.3 (u) (1) of the Eodoral Perister.
office that raintains
the information on subject is
unable to further iloncify these documents.
nort intoration provided by a joint
Dopartnont of the Army and forcign liaison opera
tion abroal.
This materinl is considered exenpt
under 5B (1) 08 8.0. 11552 And 1000.3 (x)(1) and
(3) 0f the Foileral Registor.
nation
Tio igency dispatches based on infor-
Frog unilateral
and liaison murces a-
brons concerned Subject's travel to Cubr.
This
material
considered
exempt indet: (b) (3) 08
FOlA 3nd 53 (1) OfF.D. 11652.
Ons memorarium to the FOI reporced
Subject's travel as mentioned in paragraph 1.c.
130ra.
This naterial
is considered exompt for
reason
in paragraph
l.c. tinve.
Form 3535 is attached.
iltacineat
FOrT 3535
!?".
Л!
Arless
Charles
Brlugs
Chief, Services Stass
CONG pond:
---
## Page 47
14-00009
Freedon of Intoration Coordinator
contral latelligenes Agency
hashington, b.C.
205CS
Gentlemais
The Office of the Deputy Attoric! General referred me to
I formally requess
Crio has aboat 2oo. Be rare is
to see in and all socoration, urs
Thank you
cc. Office of Congressman Toly Motfitt
---
## Page 48
SECRET
28 0ds 875
NAIIN PORS
ATTATION &
SURVITE
Chatree, taforens ten lovier Countster
Mr. W.G. Boan, Speculive Socretary
POLA APPRAL - PaLlo A. StaRerson
Rogue e L
dated I AprIl L9TS
Ors/ITo Nano dared 14 Hay 1975
DO/AS 175-190 decod Le May 1975
IES 75-801 decod 30 May 1975
Appeal
1.
dated 26 Juna. 197S
Ops/IrG Mario dared 1S July 1973
The lastial request and salvernont appeal by
Agoncy'e corruspondenco to him, and the documence that percata
have been revieved and the documate savolved are an follori
ni B 561, 11 Auguas 1969
tho
HHMA-37509• 10 July 1969
€ I001A-37416, 23 June 1969
do Headquarters 876, 26 June 1969
•.
MRXICO CITY 329, 23 June 1969.
ACHICO CITY 330, 24 June 1969
R-3663, 24 Octobor 1969
TH-559888, 26 August 1969
Itera, b and c. Iron the Lot 1n paragruph 1. vero tha basis of
che tristial reponso and dostall
(Bofarenco d.), Itess d.
and as do not meniton|
by nano but are ralative and are tacluded
for bockground informatiog.
evallabla itll afear the lalciel resposad
and cherafore vare
not conaidared la that reply.
On cho bants of our revie, ve balleve Item do, b. and e- ver
properl mempted ta secord iRs (b) (I) Bad (D) (3) of C POLA Bed S3(1) ol
5.0, 11632. Thie was raported
Ra Ratorence d. on 30 Kay 1975.
Aintalatrative-Istaroi? l'se Only
inen Separated iron Actacharate.
---
## Page 49
¡SECRET
Doinite the detafled explanation provided
vo note ls lils latter
of appeal that bo continuea to sual a baile lor cha ductason. Uita resara to
these jocusence, se ballove and agree thee rulesolng than
would violate procoction of venuitive soureso and tachode. The orifinal
destal te corroct in sould te sheld by the Icformation Revie Corniecee.
Our rever of the renaloing ibree documento (itons f., %. and ho)
resulted la the inliolas recimendations.
MP 559605. A passenser lat stiles tie Agency apparently
obtatred through foralga klatoon
Tun esture of cae
infomation
not poride segregating and releasias farta of the latI
Ne believe the document 1a exampt under (b) (1), (b) (3) Of tie FOLA and
58(1) of B.O. 11692.
D.
MEXICO CITY 330. Provides
tco sano information ao R4A-37509
nos 1o, thorofore, axemps under the sane execptiona cited in the origioal
deutal. 10. (b)(1), (D) (3) and JB(1).
1-3603. de ballera carrala surts of lads 15-page docuco.
an bo sagrogatal aud maladead
No agree wilà its on
¿he selectad portiona that abould be exirectad for raloana (dec attached
marked copy).
The balanoe of the commoc, bonver, mar be considared
ereipt under (3) (3)(a) 81d (D) (6) of the POLA:
la sunary, it la recosmanded that the appeal be denied and tha
exasptions iphald on all tha rolated documents as liatod above except in che
CaBa 01 EX-3663. The paloctad porEsons ahould be santelzai and providad to
_ This recommandacion has boon siscussad with
Odi and ho concura vich our docialoa.
131
DiO Appeale Officer
Attachmenta: a/s
ISG/EXEC
30 July 1975
Distribution:
Urig.
& 1 - Addressee
1 - ОСС (Мт. Макошка)
1 - C/IRS
2 = DDO/FIO
1 - ISG, w/o arts.
1 - Chrono, w/o arts.
2
---
## Page 50
15 M1 ps
MENORISDON FOR:
SUBJECT
REFERENCE
Freedom of Infornation Officer, D00
IKS 7S-801 (Appeal)
Request foi
Agenes doctents
Nttached are the thirce Agency docments Listol in
our monorandun of 14 May 1975:
a.
Agency dispatch INNA-3::16,
dated: 23 June 1969.
This covering dispatch does not sention Subject by man;
Subject's photograph was forwarded as an attachnent to
this
disputch.
Two other attachnones listing Subject's
name on too flight manifests are not available here, but
the reference to his travel from Mexico city to Cuba had
beon incorporated into a Spocinl Channel memorandun to
the FBI, S-501,
dated 11 August 1909 (paragraph id of
Our
14. May memorandum).
b. agency dispatch IM:l-37509, dated 10 July 1909
listed requestor as a traveler to Cuba and listed his
passport number.
It also forwarded a copy of his passport
in an atrachment which is not ararlable here.
Special Channel Memorandum B-561, dated 11
August 1969 (sce paragraph la abore).
2. He belicro that the nbove mentioned documents have
been properly
crempted in our 14 May
manorindun under (b)(1)
5(B) (1) (foreign
liaison,
in this cass,
tho sections of
liaison) and: (b)(3).
The muterial is
not segregable for re-
lease,
as the miure of the
information and its
format are
such that the requester could determine that the information
doneeryans him was obtained by the Auchey through surreptitious
Relerso would thus violate
protection of sensitive sources and nothods
CONFIDENTIAL
---
## Page 51
CONFIDENTIAL
One more docaone (nos intoxed into thie 201 file or
in) other records of this office)
has become availible:
Transmittal Manifest soosss, dated 28 August 1969L
This manifest lists Subiece imong passergers
striving
from Cab.d.
No covering dispatch was used
ind no source is given, but the information our bo oresumed
to have been provided by forcin linison
Thc
and is cortainly crempt under (b) (3)
The fornit and the nature
information do not maxe it feasible to segrogite and relcase
it/
4.
Attached is a segrogable portion of internal Agency
memorandum Ex-3005, dated 2a Detober 1009. This docunent is
it 25 page paper
and
¡ofors briefly to requestor, repeating in part the reference
to roquestors travel is reported in INMA- 37500 (Daragranh
1h abovole
The exeised portion of the dochnent is considered
exempt under (b) (3)(a) and (D) (6).
5.
Also attached are copies of three additional Agency
cables.
1550, dated 24 June 1909,
is referred to
in 10111-57509 (paragraph
tb above), and provides the same
information (except for copies of passports).
The reference
cited in
this cable, in turn,
is Headquarters 876, dated
24 June 1969, which
requested that names and passports of
groups
traveling to Cuba be cabled, as the information was
urgently needed for a paper being prepared for the White
louse.
This cable in
turn refers to
7320, dated
we shich explains the run tenderers ation
Although Hoadgurters 870
do not mention requestor by name they
rached for background information.
Chief, international Torrorisn Croup
Operations staff
Merichments:
it/5
---
## Page 52
3Wn conchates
D.0. 483050
12881
this
=.
*corney agreat chis decisione
crould line to dies
aLisio for male croister.
irish te advice that
taking the adrian do counscio
Sincerais
Cc. Congresanon Cory MetfetE
---
## Page 53
14-00000
CoM
12 Decomber 1975*
-MEMORANDUM FOR $
SUBJECT:
RE PE RENCE:
Chief, Informacion and Privacy Stuff
Roquent No. 75-1161
1.: This Directorato maintains an officlal file on
Subject.
A review of thla file and other records reveals.
the folloring information pertinent to Subject:
Twenty-nine FBI documents, Seo attached
11sting.
Five Agency documents (one cable and three
dispatches) concorned Subjoce's travel and activitlos
abroad and transmitted information
Ono special channel (B) menorandun forwarded
meterlal provided 1
to the PRI.
of this materlal to considoted exeript under pOlA, (b)
and (D) (3).
Five Agoney documenta (one cablo, three
dispatches,
srid one fold Information
report) To-
terrod to Subjoct's travols and activities abroad.
The nature of the Inforation could Identify the
source 1f 1t were released.
Ono RL memorandum, one
spocial channel (B) memorandum and one CSCI memo-
randum forwarded this Anforantion to the FBI.
Ono
scl memorandun forwarded a report to the U. S.
Intelligence Community
All of this natorial 13
considered exempt under (b)(3), sources and nothods
and (b)(1) properly classified.
One agency dispatch forwarded Information
on Subtect's activitios abrond provided by a U.
source.
This material •s exempe under HOlA
(b) (1) properly classifled and (b)(3), sources and
methods.
F2 IMPDET
CI. BY 012170
CONMIOEAOAL
---
## Page 54
Pour Internal offico memoranda (EX) per-
tained to Subject's travols, contacts and activi.
The source of throo of these was information
from the FBI; the source of ono of theao was the
Deparimens of Seate nesorandum to CIA dated 1 Feb-
TUATY 19713
All of these are exempt under FOIA (b)
(J), sources and methods, and (b) (1).
One Incemal office memorandun contains a
Mating of Subject's foreign travel.
It was Caken
fron a composite of all-sourco information, In-
cluding foreign
sources and is
considered exe inder lolA (5), and and (bel.
One Internal office (EX) nemorandun con-
cerning subject's background and activitios, which
included material fron the FBI, an Agency fleld
Information report fron a unilateral source and
an Agency dispatch forwarding information provided
by a
This memorandum
considered exompt under 70IA (b) (3) and (b) (1).
The following documents with sterilized segrosshlo
portions attached are considored relesseable to Subject
under the FOIA.
CSCI memorandun dared 17 May 1968:
oxeised
portions exempt under FOIA (h) (6), personal privacy, (h) (3)
and (b) (1).
b.
Incornal offico (BX) memorandum dated 14 July
19671
excised portions exempt under FOIA (b)(6),
personal privacy, (b) (3) and (h) (1).
Internal offico memotandum (EX) datod 26
Anril 1968:
excisod portions exempt under FolA (b
(o) personal privacy, (b) (3) and (b) (1)
Incornal office menorindun (RX) dated 10
July
excised portions erempt under FOLA (b)
(6), personal privacy, (b) (3) and (b) (1).
Attachment to a dispotch dated 23 November
excised portions exempt under (h) (6), personal
privacy and (b) (1).
Dispatch exempt under (b) (3
"sources
methods and
(b) (1).
---
## Page 55
1121
Dispatch dated as November 1965. excise
portions exempt under FOIA (5)(1) and (D) (S)
Attached aro coples
three documonts whiel
may be
used In obtaining revlows by the originatin
agencies!
Department of Army • ACSI-DSCC Momorandu
dated 8 July 1966
• Subtoet:
Transnietal of. Sun-
marlos of Infomation:
Department of Stare
toleran Coponhagen
2014 dated 21 November 1967
Departnent of Stato mamorandum dated 1
February 1971 fron Director, Passport Office re
garding Subject.
FBI.
Cable from Director,
dated 6
November 1968, Subject. Washington Mobilization
Committee to End War in Vietnam.
^1. 11235
Charles A.
Briggs
Chief, Services Staff
Attachments: NS
cc:
OPS/ITC
---
## Page 56
denatticutton c: FAl documents nuntioningl
TAS 75-1161, 30 April 19:5.
1-
Report dated
23 June: 1965, Detroit,
Michigan;
(no file nunbers)
subject: communist Infiltration of
Students for a Denocratic Society
2.
Report dator6 August 1965,
Detroit, Nichigan; Subject:
no buttle file
• по
FOF 1):
Report dated
- 8 October 1965, Detroit, Michigan
PLe: 100-53032• Bufile 105-142056; Subject:
- Security Natter - SDS
firert dated
6 December 1965,
lashington,
105-142056 (no
Bufile #) Subject:
Security Matter
5.
6.
S..
9.
10.
Report dated
17 Maj
1966,
hashington, D.C.; Subject:
no.
file a)
Report dated
17 May 1966, Nashington, D.C.;
Subject:
International Days
of Protest, March 25-26, 1966 (no
file
*)
Report dated
Re:
20 May 1966.
Detroit, Michigan;
(no file.$)
1l.
Report dated
30 June 1966,
Detroit, Michigan;
File # 100÷33052,
Sufile 105-143056;
Subject:
- Security Maiter - SDS
Report
dated
Subject:
14 September 1966
Detroit,
Michigan;
(no file ls)
Report
Nated
27 October 1966,
Detroit, Michigan;
burile
105-1+3056, Field office
file
100-25032;
Subject:
Natter - Students for a Democratic Society
Security
Rebort
dated
Subject:
FOF
35 stober 1960.
Detroit,: Nichigan;
[no Bufile, no
---
## Page 57
CON REMEL
12.1
Report dated
8 June 1967
Fieta office fuic c1 100-13602, Outane 100-138262
Subject:
"13.
Report dated
(no
file fs) Subject:
7 July 1967, Detroit, Michigan;
Students for a Democratic Society.
14.
Report dated
File H 105-11627; Butile 62-110030.
ZZuptember 1967, Detroit, Michigan;
Subject:
University Comnittee for Debate on Foreign Policy
Inter
15.
Report dated
(no file is) Subject:
7 December 1967% Phoenix, Arizona;
Anti-drale activities December
4-8, 1967; Demonstration at Selective Service Has,
Tucson, Arizona, Deceiber 4, 1967.
16.
Report dated
14 December 1967,
Portland, Jregon;
(no file is) Subject:
Oregon
Antidraft Activities,
Portland,
17.
Report dated
11 December 1967,
Cincinnati, Ohio;
Field office file CI 100-15928: Futile 105-142056.
Subject:
- Security Matter - SDS
18. Report dated
(no file #s) Subject:
31 January 1969, Nashireton. D.C
Intornal Security - CU.
19.
Report dated
report daice file due 196%, Cincin: to 1h2056.
Subject:
20.
21.
Report dated
10 October 1965,
(no file Ms) Subject:
washington, D.C.,
Foreign Travel• New left Groups -
Report dated
18 November 1968,
Jacksonville, Florida
Field office file 105-1613 (no Bufile #) Subject:
220.
Report dated
Field office
12 December 1963, New York, N.Y.:
File 100-115047 (no Bufile e) Subject:
Students for a Democratic Society - IS - SDS
Report dated :
(no file is) Subject:
6 January: 1969, San frincisco, Calif.;
---
## Page 58
2S:
26.
27.
28.
29.
Report dated
January
1969, Cincinnati,
Ohio:
Fiold office file Cl 100-15928;
Bufile. 105-142056.
Subject:
Report dated
* 10 February 1909, Nashington, D.C.;
(no file #s) Subject:
Report dated
14 April 1969,
San Francisco,
Calif.;
Field office file 100-55497; Butile 105-142056.
Subject:
- Sccurity Matter - SDS
Report dated
- 6 February 1970, Atlanta,
Georgia;
Field office file 100-7808; Bufile 105-178431.
Subject:
Report dated 28 January
1966,: Detroit, Michigan, Bufile
97-5029 field file 105-11615,
Subject:
Committee to Aid
the Vietnamese: -
Report dated 14 January 1966, Washington, D. C: no file
numbers, Subject:
Demonstrations Protesting
United
States
Intervention
in Vietnam.
---
## Page 59
Nf. Robert S. Young
Freedos of Inforention Coordinator
Central Intelligenco Agency, Wantington
Dear ir. Young,
Thank you for your loctor of upril 24, 1979, acknowledging
my Freedon-of-Information request.
Mero 1o the additional Information you ask for:
Place of birth
Date of birth:
The FBI. in a sinilar reply to a simplar request,
also
wanted sy Social Securtty number, which you may also need.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sinceroly
ArR 29 7 50 RH 75
---
## Page 60
14-00000
STATES
UNITED
AMERICA
L
April Ll, 1975
Mr. 'Inbert S. Young
CIA roodom of Information Coordinator
CIA idatra
Langley, Va.
Deark, Young,
Pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of
Inforsation Act,
plaase make available to me any materials
or fians the CIA may have collected and kept on my activin
ties.
Sinceral
SLOHY IT Y
9 | 12%
---
## Page 61
0: Deccaber 1077
MERRINDUS FOR:
AFFENETON
SURINGT
NUTRINCIS
Chrion, Tofornation Forick Coshittee (U)
ir. H. to Poon,
Assistane for Information (V)
1010 Appen
(F 15. 1100) (U)
Original Request dosen 1l April 1975 00)
11'5
Response dided 19. Fcornary
1076 (U)
Appeal letter dared 24 Februd 1976
(U)
1: (V), Sporary de Recommendations:
dudents
Rolease
additionind
Incopral ion fion six 000
inipially released
murerated versions.
Release portions of cighe 100 detaints initialiy
1010.
sustain the denial in coco of 13 a00 documenes.
Release
doctonts
in coto nine nous itens
discovered
and seton Dro
during the appeals
radice.
Daily
in
puro 15 p00 dorments discovered during
(U) Background:
•.
on 11 goril 1095 requested "ay
circria
or tiles die flA may lage collecte?
and kent en
arcivities."
the original
100 warch
27 DDO
dieurones,
29 FBl files, one
PHl. unble and thore other-
agends documents.
IP'S responded on 19 February 1976
---
## Page 62
releasing six of the DDO documents
and denying the remaining 21.
IPS advised
in segrocated versions
that the
non-DIO doctronts were being referred to the
originating agencies for direct response to him.
requestine full retire
appealed on 24 February 1976
"fill withhold dirts,
anil this
triggered in
additional
scarch with the colluring restles:
(1)
carlier
sine pres:
irons,
not considered under
vere located.
(2) 15 a resule of an exchange of referrals
between the 100 and the oys, mo accented responsibility
Far che documense dorred ty Tabs 28, '36, 32, 33
rerich-1.c. those covered by
13) 1s a result of a Privacy Act request levied
Jon the rB!,
the litter referred three
000
acmoranda, per P 76-180
Tio
of these--(SCI
716/02677-67 and ESCl s16/05757-67--had not previously
surfaced, but the third had been handled
initially
under Tab
19(H).
he informed the FBl be would
handle the former ino in the appoal.
re-checking
(2) and leiles and running down referenies.
He do unant one locaten carol rese
additions have resulled in a total
of si 000 doements
heing treated in this appeal
in increase of 24 since
she IP'S response, and nine picco items.
(5) Four EX menoranda--895,
referred
to the FBI
1070, 1076 for
2197 and 3363-.
coordination regarding FBI information therein.
The
FBI replied on
28 Morober 1076 rowarding portions to be
withhold and excaptions to he applied.
FJTA -18,789 daied 6 December 1965 (Tab 20)
for
Air Force data therein.
Air Force responded on 29. Octoher 1976 relcasing its
input.
---
## Page 63
3
(7)
Three FAl files)
in
addition to those
undertled during le
initial
sarch,
pore discovered.
DRC. 02629 and DHB-80223 note reierred to the FRI
on 5 Ocrober 1976 for direct contact with the requester,
and 180-24857 bus similarly Corarded on 26 April
1977
Three State Department doctrents were
forwarled to the Forenu of Püblic arrairs
on. 1
October 1976:
Tho of those here spare
negoranda,
aldered. to the cia.
Classpore rilled on 20 ocrober
to advise that both had alrcad been referred
The third document-rab 2l(D)-twas elcared
for release by the same telephone call.
c .
A classificition
cerios has hotn conducted on
Wo documenes involved in
this appead,
marked to
röflect this roview.
inal
all lure been
In those cases where
segregation of non-crept data has been possible, such
his been dentificd is
reconnonded for
In chose cases whore
release
the documenes have been
segregation of non-excupt
data pertaining to him has not
feasihle.
3.
(U) Recommendations:
See Tabs 12-45.
(U) This
monorandum has as yet not been coordinated
the office of the Goneral Counsel.
IDO
Appeals nifices (U)
artachments:
Tab R
Tibs 12-18
References
- As Stated
---
## Page 64
STATES
UNITED
Mr. Gene F. Wilson
•Central Intelligence Agency
Hashington, DaC. 20505
HE: FOIA Appeal
Dear Mr. WIlson,
By letter dated 11 and 26 April 1975, I asked for
my file. By letter dated, 19 February 1976, you respogred
with sore of the requested documents.
However, some
censored and others were withheld altosethe..
I hereb's
appeal: these deletions
I look forward to hearing from you within 20 dayn,
as required by law.
Sincerely
MAR 1 2 12 FH
---
## Page 65
CONFIDEATIAL
-164
2e Decenber 1975
HEMORANDUM FOR:
SUBJECT
REFERENCE
Chief, IPS
Request Nọ. 75-4681
This Directorate maintains a file
l. The folleing paragraphs describe the
tricuments held by this Utrectorate which refer in her and her specific
assoclation with the
Group.
The documents listed below are from the FBI and are exempt ger
1900:3(g) (4) of the Federal Register.
"Cormittee of Returned Volunteers
A July is ree of pen o to un are husber.
dated
Committee of Returned Volunteers (CRY)", dated 27 August 1969, from
Hashington, D.C., no file number.
"Committee of Returnes Volunteers (CRV)
dated il September 1959, fron Mashington, D.E., no file number.
Comittee of Returned Volunteers".
dated: 24
Septenber 1969,
no file nucter:
SM-R1!
e.
dated 2) February 1973, from New York, V.Y., Tile number 107-339235-416.
1. "Comittee of pete med do usess, doted 14 July 197.
file nurber: 100-45751.
There Is one Departnent of State letter, which is a requese fror
he Passoort Office Por Information of a security nature pertinentl
Idates 1 February 1971. ne file nunher.
although this leiter
1s expluded under 1900.3(g) (4) of the rederal legister, a copy is attached
for referra! to the State repartment.
E2 IMPDET
CL BY C12170
CONFIDENTIAL
---
## Page 66
72-19
CONFIDENTIAL
The following documents may not be passed
One Agency menorandum dated 11 Auqust 1969 and one
Agency Cable dated 24 June 1969 which contain Information
and are exempt per (b)(1), (b)(3)(a) an
b) (3) (b) of the FOlA and 5(b)(1) of E.0. 11652.
b.
Two Agency dispatches dated 23 June 1969 an1 10 July 1969
which
contain information from the same source as. In paragraph 43
above. The same exemptions apply.
5.
The following three Items may be passed
coples
are attached for each.
In all cases.
the excised portions are exempt per
(b)(1) (b)(3)(a). (b)(3)(b) and (b)(6) of the FOlA.
a. One Agency memorandum dated I Decenber 1971.
b. One Agency dispatch dated 6 December 1971.
c. One Agency dispatch dated. 30 November 1971.
E. Form 3533. 1s also attached.
Charles A.
Briggs
Chief, Services Staff
Attachment:
As Stated Above
---
## Page 67
4-00000
August 7, 1975
LOG
S2-Reil
Robert Young
Freedom of Information Coordinator
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 20505
Dear Mr. Young,
I understand that under the Freedom of Information Act that an organ-
can seck disclosure of any and all information and documenta
that the Central Intelligance Agency may have collected pertinent to
lts activitles.
As the resident of the now inactive, but still existant
, I would 11ke
to request any intormation
and documents that concern
the organization.
Also, as an Individual I would like to reauest anv information cocerning
my activities.
I would appreciate iny relevant inforation that
you could send along.
I look forward to your reply
and well as in restads to maysell
Sincerelv.
---
## Page 68
SECRET
19 September 1977
ATTESTION
SURJICT
REFIRINCES
chairman, Information Review Conmittee (U)
Mr. 11. G. Bean, Assistant for Information (U)
Fold Appcall
Initial Request dred 7 Angust 1975 (U)
ClA's Response dated 6 April 1926 7(U)
C.
Appeal Letter daced 5 39y 1976
(U)
1..
(U) Summary of Recommendations:
Rolease additional intomation fron three documents
initially
relcased
segregaied form.
are excepted inder (olIo send 000600101e
sustain initial donial in loto of four documents
under
exemptions (b)(1); (b) (3), (b) (0) and (b) (7) (C)
of the 101A as applicable.
c.
Rolcase in segregated form tienty-one documents
discorered in
the appeal process
Deleted portions are
exempted under (b)(1): (b)(3), (b)(6) and (h) (7) (C) of
the FOlA as applicable.
"Deny in toto seven documents that here located in
the appeal robier.
These docents are bring
denied under
exemptions (b) (1), (b) (3), (b) (0) anil (h) (?) (G) of the FOlA.
0001e.
Pass in into six overt documents located during
the appeal revich.
Refer to the FBI for their action
an identification
list
nine additional FBl coports that nore located
during the appeal revicw.
Refer one document located during the appeal review..
to the Department of the Army for their
action.
CONNICETTW
Detached From
Allachments
---
## Page 69
Julics
2.
(U) Background:
ciA requesting
On ? August 1975,
wrote the
concern.
" an organization called the
remand information and decuments that
Ms. Barnes explained that thei
"an inactive, but still existant" rescarch
group of which she is the president.
_also
stated:
"...as an individual I would like to request any
infornation concerning my activities."
b.
The 6 April 1976 response
stated
seren blO documents
form.
were being released in sanitized
This memorandum also stated that FBl and State
Department documents had been surfaced in our search
igency for action.|
was also informed of her
right to appeal.
C.
On 5 May 1976,
appealed.
information de unitial reviek, he seagch yas socitedono
including any association
with thell
she search las broadened to include any information about
regardless of
association with it. This
Tater search located additional
•documents which are included in this appeal package.
3. (U) Recommendations:
Tah A-1 contains nine overt documents that I
recommend be released
in t0t0.
Tah A contains the DDO documents that were
considered in this appeal case.
The Appeal Review Form
to each of the documents reflects. my recommendations
concerning the release of the information in the document.
All meaningful, non-exempt information applicable to this
request has been identified and is recommended for release.
A classification review has been conducted on zach of
the DDO documents reviewed in this mppeal case.
A DDO
officer with national security classification authority
has asserted that each document is
marked
in
accordance with E.O, lio Properly classified and
., as amended.
SECTIO
---
## Page 70
SLUNLI
3-
c.
Tab C contains the identification of nine
FRI docunents that vere surfaced during the appeal
search.
I recommend this list be referred to the Fil.
for their action.
d.
Tab D contains a docunent that originated with
• the Department of the Army.
I rocommend that it be
returned to the Army for their action.
Tab E contains a copy of the document that wis
referred to the Department of State for their action. and
a list of the FBl documents that were referred to the
FRI for action on 10 March 1976.
These documents were
surfaced
at the initial review search.
Tab F contains an FBI document that contained
classified information
furnished by the ClA.
FBI referred the document to the ClA for revier. A full
text copy and a copy as approved for relense are atrached.
The tuo Cla documonts that here surfaced by the FBI ind
forwarded co. the CIA for action are included as docurents
32 and 35.
(U)
OGC has not yet concurred in
those
Dilen it Sheen
Helen H. Stilson (U)
DDO Appeals Officer (U)
Attachments:
- References A through C
Tab A-1 - Documents to be released in toto with appeal
pachage
Tab
- Dho documents reviewed at aupeal level
Tab C
- Documents for referral to FBi
Tab
D
- Document to be reforred to Department of Army
Tab E
- Locuments
Tab F
-
referred with inicial review
Referral
SECRE
---
## Page 71
May 5th
Gene F. Wilson
CIA Information Review Conmittee
CLA
Washington, D.C. 20505
Dear Mr. Wilson,
On August 7, 1975, I trade a request to the CIA under tha
Freedan on Information Act for intormation, and documents
_ By letter dated
April 6, 1976, the agency aged to release a newspaper clipping
and three censored documents. The renainder of the reguested documenta
I hereby appeal the agency's denial of my request for
documents on the ercunda that the exciptions relled upon do not
apply to the requested docurents.
In reviewing whether classifled information
is tjll properly classified and therefore
excripted trun disclosure uner subsection (b) (1) , you should be
fomally Lisbanded three years ano.
In aidtion, I have renson to belleve that the agency's initial
roply is incomplete. In partferiar. the documents released by the agency c
contain only one publication
Tie docurents already releases
Indicate that the agency was at least aware of other|
publicaticis.
I hereby request a copy of any catalogue, 11st or Index of these publications.
As to any documents or portion of documents which are witheld
after this appeal, I hereby request:
(a) specification as to whether the material pertains to
or to the
(D) as to material withled on the basis of exemption (b) (5),
names of any other agency which Initiated or received coples of
Inter agency memoranda; and
(e) as to the material witheld on the basis of exemption (b) (7)
the authority for the law enforcernet activities of the
Central Intelligence Agency and the function of the investigation.
May !!
? 43 PH'76
sinierelv
---
## Page 72
2 October 75
NEMORANDUM FOR:
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
Chlof, Inforsacion and Privacy Staff
Request No. 75-5747
This Directorate has no file on
Two Asoncy documents, however
were surfaced.
documonts
aro deniod under (b)(l),
as baing properly
classified under F.O. 11652 and (U) (3) (sources and
sothods) FOLA.
Release of the portion concerning
Subject would
probably identify the source to him.
Thus ,
these
documents must be denied in full®
10/ carlo: do 966d9
Charles A. Briggs
Chiof, Sorvices Stast
E2 IMPDET
CL
SY 012170
COWaRFATI
---
## Page 73
SEP 5:
1c4 PH *75
125.75-5742
Freedom of Information Act
Robert Young CIA Cordinator
CIA:
Wasbington D.C.
20505
106
SERPCH
Dear Siro:
I bava rosson to bollove the CIA may bave a record file on
me •
In 1961 I wag a momber of an Anti-Castro group In the Ploride
Boys...
timo.
And resided on Fo lane Key In the Florida Keys for a
Since I was A devote anti-communint at tho timo and partloipated
la a raid or two (that never accomplished anything), I'm
courious to see lf entthing la in print roganting my 8o oalled
wild oats! days and tinder the Troudon of Information Aot
I hearby respootfully request a copy of any possible filoo
---
## Page 74
& December 1975
ME LIRANDUM POR
Chaiman, Infomation Revier Committee
ATTEVTION:
NE. H. G. Bean, Assistant for Information/DDA
SUBJECT:
DIA (peal
REFERENCES:
A.
Original Request, dated 1 Sep 75
B:
Reply to Subject, dated 29 Oct 75
C. ippeal letter, dated 10 Nor 75
Summary:
It is recormended that the initial denial as stated
in our reply of 29 Oct 75 be affirmed, based on Title 5,
U.S.C. 552(b)(1), (5) (3) and (b)(0) as applie to the specific documents
mentioned herein.
2.
Background:
a.
on him.
initial request bas for a copy of any Agency file
b..
The original search revealed two documents
Jwas denied the document in toto.
appeal states that he is perplexed at why the
documents were denied hin and requests the documents so that he can
correct any possible misinformation in the record.
3.
The tro dociezents 35e:
Agency dispatch UFG: 2192, 23 kg 61
on ANCIEER/! meno
of conversation
and others who
This dociment is denied under
(b) (1) properly classified, (b) (3) protecion of sources and methods
and (b) (6) protrition of the privacy of others. A representative
of lal Division does not wish to declassify this dispatch, and I concur.
Agency menorandim CSCI 3/707455 dated 4 pet 61 is a memoranium
to the FBI containing the information in UFGI ?192 plus file traces.
---
## Page 75
14-00000
This document must he denied to protect the former deep cover asset,
This document is denied under (b)(1) proper classification,
(b) (3) protection of sources and methoils and (b) (6) protection of the
privacy of others. A representative of l' Division does not wish to
declassify this memorandum, und I concur.
Reconnendation:
It is recommendel that the initial denial as
stated in
our reply of 29 Oct 75 be reaffirmed, based on Title S.
U.S.C. 552(6) (ka (b) (3) aid (b)(6) as stated above.-
5 .
OCC has concurred in the above.
DIO Appeals Officer
Attachments:
References
Agency dispatch UFGA 2192,
23 Aug 61
Agency memo CSSI 3/767,435
--- |
||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10113-10391.pdf | 104-10113-10391 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 10/25/1977 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | [[DELETE]]CI/R&A/E | ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET. | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK41 : F29 : 1993.08.09.18:02:43:000058 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10113-10391
E ONLYSS
ROUTING AND."
SHEET
SUBJEFT: (Optional)
TO:
(Officer deig
building) -
ATE
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
XTENSION
9469
OFFICER'S
INITIALS
NO CT: 5005-0
-C1: 565-77
25
COMMENTS (Nümber
hom, Draw o line
AC/CI/R&A/E
AC/CI/RGA
sor signature
:25
75126, 005
OCT 8197/
OCT. 9 NS
9.
91
001
1977
10
11.
D/Sound
„ Cat: Mage, lin
14.
15.
FORM
3-32
610 ' PROVOUS
Bol-
-31 OCT 1977:
0S: 7 4752
SECRET SC
CONFIDENTIAL'
INTERNAL
USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED
--- |
|
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 124-10243-10364.pdf | 124-10243-10364 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | FBI | 00/00/0000 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 105-38431-189 | BR | 1 | FBI | NY | 3/12/18 | null | ## Page 1
124-10243-10364
JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY:
FBI
RECORD NUMBER:
124-10243-10364
RECORD_SERIES:
NY
AGENCY FILE NUMBER:
105-38431-189
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR: FBI
FROM: BR
TO:
TITLE:
DATE: 00/00/0000
PAGES: 1
SUBJECT:
SEE FBI 105-82555-355
DOCUMENT TYPE:
ORIGINAL
CLASSIFICATION:
PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
Secret
REVIEW DATE:
STATUS
10/29/1998
Redact
NEW
CLASSIFICATION:
UPDATE DATE:
02/14/2001
RESTRICTIONS:
JFK Act 6 (1)(B)
COMMENTS:
NW 50953 DocId:32186154 Page 1
---
## Page 2
1- 30(R00.4017-631
SECRED
D AIRGRAM
DECODED COPY
0 CABLEGRAM
ORADIO
O TELETYPE
Tolson
Beimon:
Mohr
Carper
Callahan
Contad
Detonah
Evang
Gaie
Fiocon
Sullivan
Town!
Troitar
Tele, Room
Holines an
Condy
LEGAT BERN NO. 240
PAGE THREE
FOREGOING
ADDITIONAL INQUIRY
BEING MADE OF SWISS FEDERAL POLICE TO OBTAIN FURTHER CUS
PERTINENT DETAILS IF ANY LEGAT PARIS ADVISED BY BERN
HENRY DO GRUSH
RECEIVED: 3:53 PM.
MAL
BND CC: IR, BRENNAN
165-38431-189
SEARCHED... INDEXED.
SERIALIZED.
10s:
141994974
SECRET
If the intelligence contained in the
above
message is to be disseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be sulchiy
paraphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems.
50953
Doeld: 32186154
Page 2
--- |
|||
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10150-10004.pdf | 104-10150-10004 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 10/1/68 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | BRUCE L. SOLIE, DEPUTY CHIEF/SRS | MEMO: CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS IN THE CASE OF YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO. | 280 | CIA | JFK | 03/16/2018 | JFK62 : F9 : 20040301-1051500 : MEMO, INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY; DUP OF 104-10210-10009 (ARRB RELEASE). This document contains 264 text pages and 16 tab pages, total 280 p.p. | 280 | ## Page 1
104-10150-10004
1 October 1968
CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS
IN THE CASE OF
YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO
---
## Page 2
SECRET
1 October 1965
MEMORANDUM FOR: Directos of Security
FRON
: Deputy Chief, Socurity Rescarch Staft
SUBJECT
: NOSENKO, Furig Ivanovich
do
In accordance with the request of the Deputy Director
of Central Intelligence, attachod is a summary with conclusions
concerning the bona fides o Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENXO. Sub-
conclusions are contained in tas summary concerning several
majos areas which were givin pritcazy consideration la the master
of the bona fidos of NOSENKO.
2. Included in this aummary are comments concerning
conclusione in the previous summary and an annex containing i-
marks on three separate subjecto rolated to the NOSENKO CaJe.
3. In brici, the conclusion of fbis aummary is that NOSENKO
is the permon ho claims to be, thut he hold his claimed posítioas la
the KOB during 1951 - Jazuary 19o1, toat NOSeNKO was z0t dis-.
patched by the KGB, and that his previous lies and exaguerations
aro noi actually di material signulcance as ibis tiere.
Brues Li Solie
Attaciment:
Summary
3IS:460
0001002
SECRET
---
## Page 3
war.
SECRET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
: 1.
Introduction
Summary of Developments in NOSENKO Case Since
30 October 1967
=í. Analytical Comments Concerning the Bona Fides of Yuriy
Ivanovich NOSENKO
A. Is NOSENKO Identical to the Person Whom He Claims
to be?
B. Is the Claimed KGB Career of NOSENKO Plausible?
C, Has NOSENKO Given an Acceptable Explanation of
His Motivation in Contacting CIA in 1962 and For
His Defection in 1964?
D. Is the Information Furnished by NOSENKO to CIA
Concerning KGB Operations, Personalities, and
Organization Reasonably Commensurate With His
Claimed KGB Career?
E. Can the Information Furnished by NOSENKO be
Considered in Toto as Having Resulted in Material
•Damage to the KGB and/or Has the Information
Furnished by NOSENKO Been of Significant Benefit
to Western Intelligence?
F. Is There Evidence of KGB Deception or "Give-Away"
in Information Furnissed by NOSENKO Which Would
Warrant a Conclusion that NOSENKO was Dispatched
by the KGB?
0001003
SECRET
Cecide dom doisatia?
---
## Page 4
and to ...
G. Is There Evidence of a Political or Any Other Type
Objective Which Could Justify a Dispatch of NOSENKO
by the KGB With Permission to Speak Freely to CIA
Concerning His Knowledge of the KGB and Without
NOSENKO Being Given a Specific Mission or Missions?
H. Is There Any Evidence That the Contacts of NOSENKO in
1962 or in 1964 With CIA Were Known to the KGB Prior
to His Defection or That NOSENKO Was Ever Briefed
by the KGB Relative to His Behavior or KGB Objectives
During These Contacts or After His Defection?
IV. Comments Concerning Previous Conclusions in Regard to NOSENKO
A. NOSENKO Did Not Serve in the Naval RU in Any of the
Capacities or at the Places and Times He Claimed
B. NOSENKO Did Not Enter the KGB in the Manner or at the
Time He Claimed
C.' NOSENKO Did Not Scrve in the American Imbassy Scotion
Throughout the 1953 - 1955 Period as He Claimed
D. During the Period 1955 - 1960, He Was Neither a Senior
Case Officer in, nor Deputy Chief of, the Seventh
Department American-British Commonwealth Section
•
E. NOSENKO Was Neither Deputy Chiei of the American Embassy
Section nor a Senior Officer or Supervisor in the Section
During the Period 1961 - 1962 (sic)
I. NOSENKO's Claims, That in 1962 He was Chief of the
American-British Commonwealth Section and Was
Thereafter a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department,
Are Not Credible
G. NOSENKO Has no Valid Cluim to Certainty That the KGB
Recruited No American Embassy Personnel Between
1953 and His Defection in 1964
0001004
2
---
## Page 5
Annex
Annex A - Statements of Soviet Officials About NOSENKO
Annex 3 - Summaries of Cases Not Examined in Text
Annex C. - The Cherepanov Papers
0001005
SECRET
---
## Page 6
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 7
'SECKLI
• INTRODUCIION
SECRET
GROUP 1
Excluded from automatic
downgrading and
declassilication
0001006
---
## Page 8
SEGRET
INTRODUCTION
The following summary and analysis is not intended to be
all inclusive, that is to contain a specific comment on all organi-
zational, operational, personality and case type information furnished
by Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO. To attempt to do so would be repetitious
and confusing to the reader and would not be of material benefit in the
formation of logical conclusions concerning the rather limited areas of
primary concern.
This summary will not contain a detailed psychological
assessment of NOSENKO nor will it contain a recitation of the numerous
theories which have been promulgated in the past concerning varying
•-aspects
of the NOSENKO case. This summary will be primarily
directed toward the question of whether NOSENKO was or was not
dispatched by the KGB, whether his claimed KGB career is relatively
plausible and whether he has since late October 1967 been cooperative in
a reassessment of the entire case for or against NOSENKO. NOSENKO
has admitted certain lies and exaggerations in the past but claims that
these were
of a personal nature, intended to enhance his own importance
SECRET
6001007
i rarelin and
---
## Page 9
SECRET
but not to mislead this Agency in any material matters of an operational
or policy nature.
In order to avoid any misunderstanding of the phrase "bona.
fides" as considered in this summary, NOSENKO will be judged primarily
on whether he voluntarily defected to this Agency without KGB knowledge,
and whether his 1962 and early 1964 contacts with representatives of this
Agency were known to the KGB. Motivation and certain other pertinent
aspects will be considered, but his admitted previous errors, lies and
exaggerations will not per se warrant a conclusion that NOSENKO is not a
"'bona fide" defector.
There is not an accurate standard or scale of measurement
*gainst which information concerning NOSENKO can be balanced or
correlated to determine if he is or is not a dispatched KGB officer. For
purposes of this analysis and summary, an arbitrary list of areas
considered pertinent has been compiled. Readers may differ in regard to
wheiher this arbitrary standard is a completely accurate standard, but it
is felt that the information from NOSENKO and information from other
sources derived through independent investigation will permit the reader
to assess the information in toto against any standard he considers
appropriate.
The previous summary on NOSENKO entitled, "The Exami-
nation of the Bona Fides of a KGB Defector, " has been considered in
SECRET
2
60010C8
---
## Page 10
SECREI
the preparation of this sunmary. I will be commented on in part
and this mmmary will include conclusions corselated with the seven
primary conclumiona set forth on page 358 of the above summary.
Remarks concernlag certais erIors, inconsistencios, omiasions and
anupported conclusions in the previous summary in regard to specific
canes or sad arens will be included in this summary. However, this
summary will not incinde a polas-by-pola: comparison of all areas of
agreement or disagroement with inlormation contained la the previous
A positive decision in regard to NOSENKO based on all
avallable islormation should be made in the immediate futare. There
3Io so known sources currently avallable to provido new positive
Information concerning NOSENKO and his bona fides. It la recognized
that there la almaya a possibility ln the futare a sew sonrce os sourcos
will be able to turniah addicional information in regard to NOSENKO.
However, this possibility in exceedingly tenuous and lt la leit there
la ruffleient information avallable on which to base a concluston in
the NOSENKO matter.
3
0001CCS
---
## Page 11
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 12
II.
SECRET
SUMMARY OF DEVELOPVENTS IN NOSENKO CASE
SINCE 30 OCTOBER 1967
SECRET
Ghoup 1
damagrading and
declassificatloa
6001010
---
## Page 13
SECRET
SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENTS IN NOSENKO CASE
SINCE 30 OCTOBER 1967
Since 30 October 1967, interviews with Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO
have been conducted by one individual not previously known personally to
NOSENKO but who has been aware of the NOSENKO case since June 1962.
Interviews have been detailed and very extensive in scope, have
been recorded and transcribed, and have covered the entire life and career
of NOSENKO without regard to whether a particular aspect had been
covered during previous interview or interviews.
NOSENKO, although naturally apprehensive during the first few
interviews, has been cooperative, has developed a relaxed attitude, and
the interviewer has noted no significant reluctance to discuss any aspect
of his life, career, or activities. On occasion NOSENKO has indicated a
reluctance to make positive statements in certain areas previously
considered at a minimum extremely controversial. This reluctance
was understandable and when it became apparent to NOSENKO that the
SECRET
6001011
cos rating and
---
## Page 14
SECRE!
interviewer would not dispute or disparage his statements without adequate
reason; this reluctance on the part of NOSENKO, in the opinion of the
interviewer, totally disappeared.
During the interviewing period, particularly in the first six months,
NOSENKO materially assisted the interviewer by preparing approximately
sixty memoranda on such diverse subjects as his life, motivation for de-
fection, individual cases, notes which he furnished to CIA in 1964, KGB
organization, and KGB officer and agent personalities. As an example
of the scope of this work by NOSENKO, four of the memoranda included
remarks concerning approximately 875) KGB officers, 100) KGB agents,
35 GRU officers, and 400) other Soviet nationals. These lists were alpha -
betically arranged and the above indicated cooperation of NOSENKO has
materially assisted in the organization and evaluation of information
furnished by him during current interviews.
Copies of transcripts of interviews with NOSENKO and related
memoranda have been disseminated to the FBI and the CI Staff. Special
Agent Elbert Turner and Special Agent James Wooten of the Washington
Field Office/FBI in particular have given great assistance in research
and compilation of new or additional information and the FBI has inter-
viewed or reinterviewed a number of United States citizens concerning
whom NOSENKO has furnished pertinent information.
2
E ГЕТ
0001612
---
## Page 15
SLUALI
In addition, three professionale from the SB Division have
revlowed the current information and assisted in the retrtoval of
previous Information from NOSENKO and collation of current
infomaation with prevlous luformatios. The latter la a tremendous
taait becauno of the volurse of material; the sumber of Individual
cases invoived; and the entenaive infosmation in regard to KGB
personlities, procedares, organisational structare and activities.
The SB Divialos also provided the services of as expart.
translator to frantiate the tapes of the 1965 interrogation of NOSENKO
by Pair DERYABIN and one al the previoualy mentioned three pro-
fenstonala completed a now translation of the 1962 intessiowa with
NOSENKO. In additios, transcriptions of certain other particularly
pertinent previous intervlems of NOSENKO have been completed by
the Office of Security.
Approximately 7000 pugos of transcripts and selated materlal
bave been complled and diuseminated mace late Ocsober 1967. Com
ments concerning the value of tha Information containod in the above
material ase contrined in anothes section of this cummary. As of the
present time, & complate analyais is not posmibla since a considerable
portion of the material hao not been fully proceased. In the preparation
si this summary all areas of major signiflcance have been exarained.
Because of the voluminous information, all analysical asd collation work
bas not been complaiad; built ia not considered that, based on ail
3
SECRET
6001013
---
## Page 16
12-0000
SECRET
arillable informatios, the remaining work will materially nifect
the concisions drawn in this summary.
The polygraph Interviem of NOSINKO was initiatod on
2 Angunt and conciuded on 6 Auguat 1968. Approximately sixty
gressions of a pertinent nature were included la the polygraph later
View. No probleme were encountered during the polygraph luterview
and no addittonal testing al NOSENKO le anticipated, Attached la s
copy al the melf-explanatory report on the results of the polygraph
intervlew.
Interviews with NOSENKO lavo continued since the polygraph
intosstar on a temporarily reduced acalo in order to permit a revien
of previona informatios and preparation ol this summary. There la
no doubt thnt future interviews with NOSENKO will reveal information
of intulligence value, but information devaloped thus far will permit
a decialon la the cass of Yurty Ivanovich NOSENKO.
Attachment:
12 Aug 68 Polygraph Rpe
0001014
---
## Page 17
FROM
SUBJECT
: Chief, Security Research Staff
: Interrogation Research Division
Yurly Ivanovich NOSENKO
12 August 1968
IRD # 67491
IDENTIFYING DATA
Subject is a 40 year old former KGB Staffer who defected
b, to the
U.S. in 1964 12 Geneva.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Bruce I. Solie of the Security Research Staff has been de-
brieting and interrogating Subject since October 1967 in order to
resolve the issue whether Suoject was a dispatched agent of the KGB.
He has conducted & vast amount of research and checking with sources
in an effort to establish the veracity of Subject's statements.
PURPOSE
The primary. purpose of the polygraph test was to determine:
I. Whether Subject was a dispatched Agent of the KGB;
2. Whether Subject had Intentionally given Mr. Solie
any false Information.
PROCEDURE
Suoject was given a polygraph examination on 2 August 1968 at
& saiesite in the vicinity of Washington, D.C. The examination was
conducted in the English language. Subject's comprehension and the
ability to express himself in English was completely adequate for
purposes of polygraph testing. Subject was completely cooperative
in all respects. Subject displayed no evasiveness and appeared to
be completely frank whenever he was guestioned or gave information
on a topic.
The following relevant questions were asked during the first test:
Is your true name Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO? Yes.
Were you born in the year 1927? Xes.
Besides the Americans, did you tell anyone else about your
intention to defect?
NO.
0001015
SECRET
GROW'
Excliced drag gularais
forecoding aud
---
## Page 18
14-00000
IRO $ 67421
Page 2
Did you ever tell anyone in the KGB about your contact with
American Intelligence? No..
Were you given instructions by the KGB to get in contact with
American Intelligence? No.
Were you told by the KGB to defect in order to carry out an
Intelligence mission? No.
The following relevant questions were asked during the seconê test:
Did the KGB actually send a communication for your recall to
the USSR on the day of your defection? No.
Were you acquainted with CHEREPANOV? Yes.
Did you actually travel to Gorkly In November 1963 to hunt for
CHEREPANOV? Yes.
'Are you deliberately withholding from us any information about
the KGB recruitment of Americans? No.
Does the KGB have METKA and NEPTUNE 80? Yes.
Were you the responsible Case Officer for John Abidian in 1960-617
Yes.
Do you know the true name of ANDREY Or SASHA? No.
Did you ever have tuberculosis?
Yes.
The following relevant questions were asked on test three:
Did you serve in Navy Intelligence from 1951 to 1953% Yes.
Was (SHUBIN in the USSR during the period 1957 to 1959? Yes.
Io the best of your knowledge, were you in the Seventh
Department at this time? Yes.
Did you telephone the GRU about SHUBIN at this time? Yes.
•To the best of your knowledge, was POPOV compromised because
of the letter Mr. Winters mailed? Yes.
0001016
---
## Page 19
a. and
IRI
Pager
67431
To the best of your knowledge, was PINKOVSKTY exposed to the
KGB because of the mass surveillance on the British Embassy?
Yes.
Was there any misleading Information in the notes you-brought
out from the Soviet Union? No.
Did you intentionally exaggerate your personal association with
GRIBANOV? NO.
Are you hiding any adverse information about your background? No.
Subject's polygraph test reflected no significant responses indicative
eception regarding the relevant questions asked. No further polygraph
s were administered on this date because the examiner did not want to
ine risk of fatigue setting in and thus possibly causing adrenalin.
Polygraph testing was resumed on 6 August 1968. The following
ant questions were asked on test fowr:
ou Join the KGB in March 1953? Yes.
are you a KGB officer from 1953 to 1964? Yes.
re you a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department? Yes.
re you only a Captain at this time?
Yes.
re you an officer in the U.S. Embassy Section from March
3 to May 1955%
Yes.
1958 and 1959 were you the Deputy Chief of the American-
tish-Canadian Section in the Seventh Department? Yes.
January 1960 to December 1961 vere you the Deputy to the
of the First Section of the First Department?
Yes.
January to July 1962 were you the Chief of the Flrst Section
e Seventh Department? Yes.
you an officer in the First Section, First Department,
_SCD,
• time of the Stalingrad operation against Benson, Mule and
?. Yes.
0001015
---
## Page 20
IRD # 67491
Page 4
The following relevant questions were asked on test five:
Since 1953 do you know of any other KGB recruitments in the
American Embassy besides ANDREY and HOWARD? No.
Did the KGB know about the notes you brought out? No.
Have you told us the complete truth about your kGB career?
Yes.
Did you intentionally exaggerate your personal involvement in
cases in 1962 and 1964 in order to mislead us? No.
Did you Intentionally give us any false operational.
information? No.
Did GRIBANOV offer you the position of Deputy Chief of the
First Department?
Xes.
Was an order actually prepared promoting you to deputy to the
Chief of the First Department? Yes.
In early 1960 dia GRIBANOV tell you that your primary responsibility
was to work against American Code Clerks?
Yes.
Other than you mentioned, are you hiding any other reasons for
your defection? No.
Are you deliberately withholding any information on any foreigners
recruited by the KGB? No.
The following relevant questions were asked on test six:
Did you enter the KGB through the influence of General BOGDANN
KOBULOV?
Yes.
Did you succeed BAKHVALOV as Deputy Chief of the First Section?
Yes.
Did GRYAZNOV succeed you as Deputy Chief of the First Section?
Yes.
Were the CHERTPANOV papers passed to the Americans with KGB
knowledge?
No.
0001018
---
## Page 21
SLCRET
IRD # 67421
Page. 5
To your knowledge was there any misleading infomation in the
CHEREPANOV papers? No.
Did you ever personally meet GOLITSYN? No.
Was there a cable sent to Geneva for you to assist ARTFMEV
In the BELITSKIY CaSe?
Yes.
Did you personally make an approach to KEYSERS
at the Moscow
Airport? Yes.
The following relevant questions were asked on test seven:!
Did you actually review the KGB file on OSWALD? Yes.
Did LEE HARVEY OSWALD reCeive
any KGB training or assigments?
No.
Were there any microphones installed in the North Wing of the
U.S. Embassy in Moscow?
Was the review of microphone reports one of your duties in
1960-617 Yes.
Are you withholding any Information known to you concering
KGB microphones or electronic activity against the U.S.
Embassy?
NO.
Before your official transfer to the Seventh Department did
you read the surveillance report on the visit of ABIDIAN
to PUSHKIN street? Yes.
Did you personally conduct a certain investigation of SHAKOV
in 1962 In Geneva? Yes.
Was the rank of Lieutenant Colonel on your travel document i
to GORIIY only a mistake by KASHPEROV?
Yes.
The following relevant questions were asked on test eight:
While in the U.S. Embassy Section did you obtain a typewriter
for BORODIN for the preparation of a letter to Edward Ellis
SMITH? Yes.
0001019
---
## Page 22
IRD t/ 67491
Page
Did you read the official repori of KOSOLArOV on his contact
with JENNER on a train from llelsinii to Moscow? Yes.
Are you intentionally withholding any infornation concerning
KGB knowledge of CIA personnel in Moscow? No.
Is there any possibility that the iCE would aispatch an officer
to defect to the Americans? No.
Subject's polygraph test of 6 August Likewise reflated no
indications of deception.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the overall analysis of Subjeci's polygraph
tests, It is the opinion of the undersigned that the Subject has
been substantially truthul in answering the relevant questions.
asked.
6001020
Censeeine and
---
## Page 23
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 24
SECRET
III. ANALYTICAL COMMENTS CONCERNING THE BONA FIDES
OF YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO
SECRET
89000 1
Excluded tron adiematic
tomagrading a:2
declassification
6001021
---
## Page 25
SECRET
ANALYTICAL COMMENTS CONCERNING THE BONA FIDES OF
YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO
As indicated in the introduction to this summary, information in
regard to Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO will be considered against an arbi-
trary but realistic list of areas considered pertinent to the question of
whether NOSENKO voluntarily defected to this Agency without KGB
knowledge, and whether his 1962 and early 1964 contacts with represent-
atives of this Agency were known to the KGB:
It was noted that motivation and certain other pertinent aspects
would also be considered but that his admitted previous lies and exag-
gerations would not per se warrant a conclusion that NOSENKO is not a
"bona fide defector."
The following is a list of the areas considered pertinent and which
are being given specific consideration. Attached is a separate section
containing remarks in regard to the designated areas of A - H.
A. Is NOSENKO identical to the person whom he claims
to be?
B. Is the claimed KGB career of NOSENKO plausible?
SECRET
GROUP 1
Excluded trem automatic
downgrading and
declassification
0001022
---
## Page 26
C. Has NOSENKO given an acceptable explanation of
his motivation in contacting CIA in 1962 and for his
defection in 1964?
D. Is the information furnished by NOSENKO to CIA
concerning KGB operations, personalities, and organi-
zation reasonably commensurate with his claimed KGB
career?
E.: Can the information furnished by NOSENKO be con-
sidered in toto as having resulted in material damage
to the KGB and/or has the information furnished by
NOSENKO been of significant benefit to Western Intelli-
gence?
F. Is there evidence of KGB deception or "give away" in
information furnished by NOSENKO which would warrant
a conclusion that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB?
G. Is there evidence of a political or any other type objective
which could justify a dispatch of NOSENKO by the KGB
with permission to speak freely to CIA concerning his
knowledge of the KGB and without NOSENKO being given
a specific mission or missions?
0001023
SECRET
---
## Page 27
14-00000
SECRET
H. Is there any evidence that the contacts of NOSENKO
in 1962 or in 1964 with CIA were known to the KGB
prior to his defection or that NOSENKO was ever briefed
by the KGB relative to his behavior or KGB objectives
during these contacts or after his defection?
6001024
SECRET
---
## Page 28
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 29
14-00000
SECRET
A. IS NOSENKO IDENTICAL IO THE PERSON
WHOM HE CLAIMS TO BE?
0R027 1
SECRE
Excludeo from aromatie
donagrading ard
declassification
0001025
---
## Page 30
SECREI
A. Is NOSENKO identical to the person whom he claims to be?
During interviews
NOSENKO has furnished detailed information in regard
to his family, his activities as a youth, the schools he attended, assoc-
iates of his father and mother, and his own associates. The period
under consideration in this section is the period preceding his entry
into the First Department, Second Chief Directorate, MVD, in mid-
March 1953.
Information furnished by NOSENKO concerning his father and
mother and his early life, together with other information such as a
comparison of photographs of NOSENKO and a photograph of his father
and confirmed travel of his mother to Western Europe in 1956 with
Madame KOSYGINA, conclusively establish that he is Yuriy Ivanovich
NOSENKO, the son of Ivan Isidorovich NOSENKO, the Minister of Ship-
building in the USSR prior to his death in 1956. This is also satisfactorily
supported by personal-type information furnished by NOSENKO concern-
ing other associates of his father and mother.
Since, as indicated above, there is considered to be no doubt
that Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO is the son of the former Minister of
Shipbuilding, a detailed study of his life prior to 1945 (age 18) is of
SECRET
000102S
GROUP 1
Excluded from aulemalles
doragracing nud
---
## Page 31
SECRET
little or no value in assessing the bona fides or non-bona fides of
NOSENKO. An expose of his youthful indiscretions, of which he has
admitted a number, is of no import in a discussion of whether NOSENKO
was or was not dispatched by the KGB. Obtaining any collateral first-
hand information in regard to NOSENKO before 1945 would be of
negligible value, but there actually is supporting information from
Nikolay ARTAMONOV, a defector from the Soviet Navy, concerning
the claimed attendance by NOSENKO at a military-naval preparatory
school in Leningrad.
NOSENKO, during current interviews, has stated that he grad-
uated from the Institute of International Relations in 1950 and had
attended the Institute since 1945. He has explained that he should have
graduated in 1949 since it was a four-year course, but failed the final
examination in Marxism and therefore was required to attend the Institute
for a longer period of time and again take his final examinations.
Based on information furnished by NOSENKO concerning co-
students and the Institute, there is no reason to doubt that he actually
attended and graduated from the Institute of International Relations in
1950. The previous controversy in this matter was complicated by
NOSENKO who, in 1964 after his defection, stated in a biography that
he had graduated from the Institute in 1949. Actually this statement
0001027
2
SECRET
---
## Page 32
SECRET
by NOSENKO in 1964 resulted in conflicting information since NOSENKO
on 9 June 1962 during his first contact with CIA had stated that he
"completed the Institute of International Relations in 1950." NOSENKO
has given the explanation that he changed the date of his graduation to
1949 because he did not wish to admit that he had failed to graduate in
1949: NOSENKO explained that this change in his date of graduation
caused him to pre-date his actual entry into Navy Intelligence to 1950
instead of 1951 and his actual entry into the KGB from 1953 to 1952.
The above action by NOSENKO is included in what NOSENKO has
characterized as his "stupid blunders." The latter is a rather apt
characterization of his now admitted lies and exaggerations but is not
evidence that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB. It is evidence of
a certain personality trait of NOSENKO who has in the past by his own
admission tended to enhance his importance and astuteness by graphically
portraying his personal participation in KGB activities concerning which
he had knowledge but did not personally participate.
The claimed service of NOSENKO in Navy Intelligence during
March 1951 to early 1953 in the Far East and the Baltic areas has been
seriously questioned in the past. Specific comments on this period of
3
SECRET
6001028
---
## Page 33
!
time are contained in a separate section of this summary, but it is
considered that the recent interviews of NOSENKO satisfactorily sub-
stantiate his claimed service in Navy Intelligence during March 1951
to early 1953.
Attached is a typed copy of a handwritten memorandum completed
by NOSENKO on 31. October 1967. This is a biographical statement con-
cerning his life and KGB career. No effort has been made to correct
grammatical errors or spelling since to do so would be in conflict with
the manner in which current interviews were conducted; namely, to give
NOSENKO an opportunity to recount his life and activities to permit a re-
examination of the entire case. The comprehension and fluency of
NOSENKO in the English language was adequate for interview purposes
in October 1967 and both have materially improved since that time.
Interviews of and memoranda prepared by NOSENKO since
31 October 1967 have not indicated any material discrepancies with the
statements of NOSENKO in the attached memorandum. One change that
has been made by NOSENKO is that he now dates his transfer from the
First Department, Second Chief Directorate (SCD), KGB, to the Seventh
Department, SCD, as occurring in the latter part of May 1955 rather
than June - July 1955 as indicated in the attached statement. NOSENKO
also now dates the period in which an unsatisfactory "characterization"
0001029
SECRET
---
## Page 34
(personnel evaluation) was prepared on NOSENKO in March - April
1955 rather than May - June 1955. Since the unsatisfactory personnel
report was directly related to his transfer to the Seventh Department,
neither of the above changes are
considered to be of a significant nature.
An effort has been made during current interviews to differentiate between
errors due to faulty memory and discrepancies indicative of deception by
NOSENKO.
Attachment:
31 Oct 67 Memo
5
SECRET
0001030
---
## Page 35
SEChEl
Operational Memo # N-2
SUBJECT: NOSENKO, Yuri Ivanovich
. The following is a typed copy of a handwritten memorandum
furnished by Subject on 31 October 1967, following a request on
30 October 1967:
I, NOSENKO, George, was born 30 October 1927 in the city
Nicolaev, Ukraine.
My family: the father - NOSENKO, Ivan, b. 1902, was working
at the shipbuilding plant and studied at the shipbuilding institute, which
he finished in 1928; the mother - NOSENKO, Tamara (nee MARKOVSKI),
b. 1908, a housewife; the brother - NOSENKO, Vladimir; b. 1944, a
student.
In September 1934 I began to study in the school (0 class) but
studied a short period of time because in October with the mother went
in Leningrad where the father was working at the shipbuilding plant,
"Sudamech" from summer 1934. In Nicolaev I was living at the Street
Nicolski 7. All relatives of my family were living also in Nicolaev.
In Leningrad I was living with parents in three places till 1938:
at the Street Stachek (1934 - summer 1935), St. Canal of Griboedov,
154 (1935-1938), St. M. Gorky (short period in 1938). From 1935 till
SECRET
0001031
GROUP T
Excluled from automalie
---
## Page 36
1938 I studied at the schools, which were close to my places of living.
In 1938 the father began to work in Moscow and soon I with the mother
went to live in Moscow in the end of this year.
In Moscow we were living at the St. Serafimovich, 2.
Here
I was continuing to study at the school 585 (St. B. Polianka). In 1941
I finished 6th class and went with parents to rest to the south (Sochi)
but soon began the war and we returned in Moscow.
In October 1941 I with my mother went in the evacuation in
Cheliabinsk (Ural), where I finished 7th class in spring 1942. In
Cheliabinsk I lived in the poselok ChIZ, being there I tried to run to
the front with my playfellow BUSKO, but we were caught and returned
home. In 1942 (summer) I went with the mother in city Gorki and in
July- August we returned in Moscow.
In August I entered in the Moscowite military-navy special
school, which was evacuated in Kuibyshev, where I finished 8th class
in summer 1943 and after that I arrived on a leave in Moscow. Thie
• school must be evacuated from Kuibyshev in Achinsk (Siberia) and I
did not want to go there. With the help of father I was accepted in the
Baku's military-navy preparatory school and in August went in Baku,
where I was studying at the second course (9th class). In this school
I twice tried to be sent as a volunteer to the front but failed. Soon
d1.0=
2
SECRET
0001032
---
## Page 37
after that I run with a friend (RADCHENKO) home in Moscow (January
1944). : In Moscow I studied at the courses (Russian word), finished
9th class and was accepted again in the military-navy preparatory
school, which was located in Leningrad. In August of 1944 I went in
Leningrad.
All cadets of this school were sent to forest (about 200 km.
from Leningrad) to prepare wood for winter, where we have been two
monthe. In November I wounded by chance the left hand and was put
in the navy hospital. When I was in the hospital I decided not to return
in the school but to finish 10th class in Leningrad about what I have
written a letter to my father asking his help and agreement with such
my decision. With the help of the father's friends I quited with the school
and entered in the shipbuilding college on the second course in January
1945 and studied there till the end of May. The WWIl finished and I
decided to return to Moscow. The director of the shipbuilding college
had given me a document that I studied in this college at the second
course and finished this course (though I was not passing exams). In
Leningrad I was living in the hostel of this college (St. Tolmachev). .
In May 1945 I arrived in Moscow and was living with parente
(St. Granovaki, 3).
3
0001033
SECRET
---
## Page 38
ocunci
In summer 1945 there was created the institute of the inter.
national relations in Moscow and in July I entered in this institute.
In July my father went in Germany with the group of engineers
and he took me (I received a temporary rank of a senior lieutenant,
documents and a uniform).
In 1945-1950 I studied at the institute. In 1946 I acquainted! /
with a girl - Shishkov FLAVIA, student of the medicine institute. I
was in close relatione with this girl, because of the pregnancy I married
her and she made an abort. My parents were against the marriage and
we did not live together and we soon divorced. In the end of 1946 I was
acquai nted with Telegin AUGUSTINE and was going to marry her, re
ceived a flat in 1947 (St. Mira - former Ist Uecyehckad, 162/174). In
November her father, General TELEGIN, was arrested, but I married
" her. The marriage was not successful. I foundout about her close
relations with the brother, and the child-girl was born with pathological
changes. I was not the father of this child. After that I broke with her
and we were living separately (end of 1948 - beginning 1949).
In spring 1950 before state exams in the institute was working
the commission, which was deal ing with future works of the students of
my 5th course. I expressed a wish to work in any military organization
0001034
---
## Page 39
and soon I was invited to visit personnel department of MGB (Ministry
of State Security). But MGB did not accept me. After that with the
help of the father I began to deal with the personnel department of the
intelligence of the ministry of military navy concerning my future work.
Passing state exams I failed Marxism-Leninism and with a
group of fails I was passing state exams once more. In October 1950
I finished the institute and received a diploma.
I was accepted in the navy intelligence in the 13 of March 1951
and in March 17 went by a train to Soviet Harbour (intelligence of 7th
Fleet, as an interpreter of the information department). Before going:
to the Far East I began my divorce with the former wife.
At the end of April 1952 I went on a leave in Moscow. Immediately
after returning in Moscow I had a blood cough out. In the middle of May
I went to a tuberculous sanatorium not far from Moscow. In July I
finished my treatment and returned in Moscow. Because of the health
I could not return back to the Far East and the personnel department of
the navy intelligence sent me to Baltic Sea (as a senior interpreter of
the navy intelligence point of the intelligence of 4th Fleet - in Sovietsk,
Kaliningrad's dietrict).
When I studied at the institute I as all the students received a
rank of junior lieutenant of administrative service after finishing the
0001035
5
SECRET
---
## Page 40
second course in 1947. In 1951 the ministry of navy had given me also
the rank of junior lieutenant when I was accepted in the navy intelligence.
In September-October 1952 I received a rank of lieutenant.
In Sovietsk the work was not interested and for me it was nothing .
to doi
Besides this the climate was not good for my health and I decided
to change the job. With thie purpose before new year at the end of 1952
I took a leave and went to Moscow. January 1 I was with my parents
at the evening party at the cottage of General MGB KOBULOV, whom I
did not know before, but I knew his son-in-law Vahrushev Vasili - a
former student and my friend. I told him about my job and that now I
was thinking about change of the job. KOBULOV was speaking with me
on this theme and propose we work and his help in MGB, but nothing
more definite was said about my work. This month I reported to the
head of the personnel department of the navy intelligence KALOSHIN
about my decision and that I will be working in MGB.
In the end of January I went again in the tuberculous sanatorium,
where I was in 1952. In the days of funeral of STALIN I has come to
Moscow and visited the ministry where my father was working. There
I have seen General KOBULOV who has
come to the father and he said
that he would settle my question concerning my job. After several days
in the middle of March I have received a telephone call from MVD to
0001036
6
SECRET
---
## Page 41
SECREA
come to KOBULOV. There I have spent about two hours in the re-
ception room of KOBULOV, but he was too busy and his assistant
SAVITSKI sent me to the Deputy of the Chief of the Second Directory
SHUBNIAKOV, who told me that there was signed an order and I was
accepted in the 1 department of 2 chief directory as a case officer.
SHUBNIAKOV invited the deputy of the chief of l department GORBATENKO
(who was acting as the chief of 1 Department because the chief of the
department KOSLOV, Anatoli, was appointed to the special department
of extraordinarily affairs (investigation) ). SHUBNIAKOV and
GORBATENKO said to me that I would be working in the l section of
the department. Then I with GORBATENKO went to the 1 department,
was acquainted with the chief of section KOSLOV, Veniamin. KOSLOV
told me that I will be working against the American correspondents,
showed me room, my desk and acquainted with the officers, who were
working in this room: KUTIREV, RACOVSKI, GROMOV and TURMOSOY.
The last officer must give files on the correspondents and agents. I
was said to come next day and began to work.
When I was resting in the tuberculous sanatoriim I acquainted
with KOJEVNIKOV, Ludmila, a student of the Moscowite University,
and in June 1953 we married. Before it I was living with my parents
at St. Gorky, 9, but after marriage was living with the wife at
6001057
---
## Page 42
St. Serafimovich, 2 (the flat of her parents). In 1955 I received a flat.
at St.
Narodnya, 13, where was living with my family.
In 1954 I contracted a disease (gonorrhea) and on the advice
of the friend IVANOV went to medic point at St. Negliunya. Doctors
asked to show a document,. I had with me only MVD certificate and an:
operative passport and showed them the passport.. Doctors had given
me a treatment, after that twice they made tests and asked to come once
more, but I did not come. They wanted to see once more and sént a
letter to the place of work, which was written in the passport. The
plant with MVD found out about it.. The deputy of the chief, SHUBNIAKOV,
was speaking with me. I had written my explanation, and punished by the
chief of the 2 directory, FEDOTOV - 15 days of arrest. The komsomol's
organization also punished me. I received a strict reprimand and was
' freed of the head of komsomol's organization of the 2 chief director.
I was a member of komsomol's organizationfrom, October 1943.
In the end of 1954 before leaving komsomol (because of age) the komsomol
organization of KGB took off this strict reprimand.
In 1955 on all officers of the 2 chief directory were written
characterizations (May-June). In my characterization was written that
I did not appropriate to the 1 department 2 chief directory. In June.
July I was appointed to the 7 départment 2 chief directory as a case
0001038
8
---
## Page 43
14-00000
officer of 2 section. This section was new created (the work against
tourists). The chief of 7 department - PERFILIEV, the chief of the
2 section - GUSKOV.
In 1956 I was accepted as a candidate in the Communist Party,
soon received a rank of a senior lieutenant and got a promotion a
senior case officer.
In 1957 I was accepted in the Party as a member.
In August 1956 my father died.
In 1957 or 1958 I was promoted a deputy chief of 2 section. In
7th department I was working till 1960 and in January 1960 was sent to
work as a deputy chief of the l section in the 1 department 2 chief
directory (chief of the 1 department, KLIPIN, Vlad., chief of the
1 section - KOVSHUK).
My family was consist of the wife and two daughters: Oksana,
born in 1954, and Tamara, born in 1958. Oksana was ill (bronchial
asthma) from 1957 and almost every year till 1963 2-3 monthe was in
hospitals: In 1960 I'was thinking about change (temporary) place of
living and there was a possibility to go to work in 2 departments KGB
in Lvov and Odessa. But there was another question if I go from Moscow
I would lose the flat in Moscow. At this time the chief of the section of
2 department, PIATROVSKI, proposed to me to go to work in Ethiopia
0001639
9
SECRET
---
## Page 44
SECRET.
(counter-intelligence work among Soviet specialists in Ethiopia). The
chief of 2 chief directory agreed and the question was almost decided
•but in the last moment the personnel department of KGB did not agree.
The reasons were the case of 1954 (illness and use of the passport for
"cover) and a checking in the place of my living (some of agente report
that drink and on this base have quarrels with the wife).
I was working in the 1 department till 1962. In January 1962
I was appointed again it-the 7 department as the chief of the 1 section
(work against tourista from the USA and Canada).
In December 1959 I got a rank of a captain.
When I began to work in the 7 department I knew that soon I
must be promoted a deputy chief of the department, when would free
a place - the deputy chief of department BALDIN was preparing to go
to work in eastern Germany.
In July 1962 I was appointed the deputy chief of 7 department
(the chief of the department was CHELNOKOV) and here I was working
till January 18, 1964.
During my work in MVD-KGB I did not study in any school,
only in 1953-1954 was visiting courses of foreign languages of MVD-
KGB at St, Kiselni.
10
6001040
SECRET
---
## Page 45
SECRET
Five times I was sent abroad: In 1957 I was in England with a
sport delegation; in 1958 was again in England with a sport delegation;
in 1960 I was in Cuba with a delegation of specialists
of nickel industry;
in 1961 I was sent in Bulgaria with the aim to help to 1 department 2
directory MVD; in 1962 I was in Switzerland - the conference of dis -
armament.
Working in MVD-KGB every year I had leaves for rest. In
1953 with the wife I was resting in the tuberculous sanatorium. In 1954
I was with the family at the cottage. In 1955 I was resting at the cottage.
In March 1956 I was resting with the wife in Karlovi Vary, Czechoslovakia
In 1957 I was in Leningrad two weeke with the wife and then rested at
the cottage.
In 1958 I was resting at the cottage. In 1959 I with the wife
rested in Sochi, In January-February 1960 I rested with the wife in
Kislovodsk. In 1961 - August - I rested with the wife and daughters in
Nicolaev. In October 1962 I rested with the wife in Sochi. In July 1963
I rested with the wife and daughters in Anapa.
C001041
11
---
## Page 46
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 47
SECRET
B. iS THE CLAIMED KGB CAREER OF NOSENKO PLAUSIBLE?
SECRET
Elust ton automatic)
dowagradiar and
declassification
0001042
---
## Page 48
B. Is the claimed KGB career of NOSENKO plausible? In the
past the theory has been advanced that NOSENKO was never an officer
in the KGB. Information of a detailed nature from NOSENKO concern-
ing the KGB, particularly the Second Chief Directorate, has been 80
extensive as to invalidate any contention that he was not a KGB officer.
It is considered that NOSENKO was a KGB officer in the claimed
Departments during the claimed periods of time and served in the claimed
positions in each Department. It is interesting to note that NOSENKO has
not materially varied in his statements in regard to the above since his
original contact in June 1962 (with the exception of his change to 1952 as
date of his entry into the KGB and then later reverting to the date given
in 1962). There have been some variations in dates of a minor nature,
as indicated elsewhere in this summary, but these are of month or day .
of transfer from one Department to another and not considered critical
or evidence of deception. NOSENKO has admitted previously giving false
information in regard to rank and medals, but his basic story concerning
SECRET
GROUP 1
Congrating att
0001043
---
## Page 49
his KGB career today is not significantly different from the fragmentary
version he gave in June 1962.
Basically the following is now considered to have been the KGB
career of NOSENKO:
Mid-Marck 1953 - late May 1955, First Section,
First Department, SCD
Late May 1955 - December 1959 (1958 - December
1959 - Deputy Chief of Section) Seventh
Department, SCD
January 1960 - December 1961, Deputy Chief of
Section, First Section, First Department,
SCD
January 1962 - July 1962, Chief of First Section,
Seventh Department, SCD
July 1962 - January 1964, Deputy Chief of Seventh
Department, SCD
(NOTE: The term Deputy Chief is being used throughout this
summary, but the better terminology probably is "Deputy to Chief."
The position of "Deputy Chief" in United States Government parlance,
including CIA, is not synonymous with the term "Deputy Chief" as used
0001044
SECRET
---
## Page 50
in Soviet organizations and more specifically in the KGB. As an example,
a Chief of Department in the KGB or the Chief of a Residentura abroad
may have 2, 3 or even 4 deputies, one of whom is given the title of
First Deputy. This particular deputy acts in the absence of the Chief
of Department and in general has
supervisory functions over all the
Department sections. The exception to the latter is when the Chief of
Department retains direct supervision over what he may consider the
most important section. Other deputies have supervisory functions only
over designated sections or organizational components.)
During current interviews and in prepared memoranda, NOSENKO
has furnished detailed information which it is considered substantiates
his claimed positions in the KGB. Detailed remarks on these topics are
contained in separate sections of this summary.
It is realized that GOLITSYN, although confirming that NOSENKO
was a KGB officer in both the First Department and Seventh Department,
SCD, has stated that NOSENKO remained in the First Department until
circa 1958 and that NOSENKO was not Deputy Chief of the First Section,
First Department, in 1960. It is impossible to correlate this information
with the above indicated opinion that NOSENKO left the First Department
in late May 1955 and was Deputy Chief of the First Section, First Depart-
ment, in 1960, nor is an adequate explanation of these variances available
0001C45
3
SECRET
---
## Page 51
SECRET
at this time. On the other hand, it is not reasonable that NOSENKO
would lay claim to the title of Deputy Chief of the First Section, First
Department, if this were not true when he clearly knew of the visits of
GOLITSYN to the First Section in 1960 - 1961 and of his conferences
with officers closely associated with NOSENKO at that time.
NOSENKO has also mentioned a number of officers of the SCD
or former officers of the SCD who transferred to the FCD with whom
he was personally acquainted and who were also known to GOLITSYN.
A number of these officers were officers from whom GOLITSYN has
stated he obtained certain information or through whom he became aware
of certain activities including Vladislav M. KOVSHUK, Gennadiy I.
GRYAZNOV, Vladimir Ivanovich PETROV, Yuriy I. GUK, Vladimir
A. CHURANOV, Yevgeniy GROMAKOVSKIY and Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV.
The statement of NOSENKO that although he had heard of
GOLITSYN he had never personally met GOLITSYN, stands in conflict
with the statements of GOLITSYN that he, GOLITSYN, had met and
talked with NOSENKO in the SCD in the late 1950's. The description
of GOLITSYN of this meeting is that of a casual encounter in the halls
rather than a specific office visit. In light of this, the absence of any
reason why NOSENKO from his point of view should remember such
an encounter and the absence of any reason for NOSENKO to lie on this
0001046
SECRET
---
## Page 52
Scuncl
issue, it is eminently reasonable to conclude that the encounter took
piace but that NOSENKO simply has no recollection of it. There is
no reason to attach significance to this lapse of memory.
The previous opinion that NOSENKO did not hold the claimed
position of Deputy Chief, First Section, First Department, during 1960
1961 has had the most merit in the controversy over his statements
relative to his KGB career. This particular aspect will be covered in
detail in another section, but of note at this time is the controversy
over what duties the position of Deputy Chief of Section in the SCD, KGB,
entails or does not entail. It is a fruitless exercise to attempt to judge
whether NOSENKO was Deputy Chief of the First Section in 1960 - 1961
on the basis of whether his knowledge of the total activities of the First
Section was commensurate with the knowledge of a Deputy Branch Chief
in CIA in regard to the activities of the entire Branch.
Whether NOSENKO was a Deputy Chief of Section in the SCD,
KGB, must be judged on the basis of what were the duties of a Deputy
Chief of Section in the SCD and in particular what were his duties in
the particular assignment. The organizational structure of the KGB
may or may not have some similarities to the organizational structure
of CIA, but any similarities are surely not such as to permit a judgment
5
SECRET
0001047
---
## Page 53
SECRET
as to whether NOSENKO held a certain claimed position on the basis
of a comparison of his activities and responsibilities with that inherent
in a somewhat similar position in CIA.
One of the most important differences between United States
agencies
or organizations, including CIA, and the bureaucratic structure
of agencies of organizations in the USSR, including the KGB, is the
salary structure. Pay of a KGB officer is based on military rank and
on actual position held with an additional percentage increase for longevity
and language qualification. Actual position held is important from a
monetary viewpoint in addition to the prestige. As an example, the
difference in monthly salary between a captain and a major is twenty
rubles and the difference in salary between a Senior Case Officer and
a Deputy Chief of Section is also twenty rubles. An increase in military
rank alone has limited pay advantages, as for example a Lieutenant
Colonel who is only a Senior Case Officer receives less pay than a major
who holds the position of Chief of Section.
During current interviews, an effort has been made to obtain
from NOSENKO statements concerning his responsibilities in the various
claimed positions. The judgment on whether he held or did not hold
the various claimed positions, in view of the absence of any factual
6
6001(48
---
## Page 54
supporting or refuting information, has necessarily been based to a
considerable degree on the logic of the statements made by NOSENKO.
Admittedly this is not the most satisfactory way of resolving the
questions, but it is the only method possible at this time.
0001049
7
SECRET
---
## Page 55
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 56
SECRET
C. HAS NOSENKO GIVEN AN ACCEPTABLE EXPLANATION OF
HIS MOTIVATION IN CONTACTING CIA IN 1962
AND FOR HIS DEFECTION IN 1964?
SECRET
GROUP 1
Excladed iron automatle
coungrading aud
declassification
6001050
---
## Page 57
SECRET
C. Has NOSENKO given an acceptable explanation of his
motivation in contacting CIA in 1962 and for his defection in 1964? Of
the eight listed categories which are being given specific consideration
in the matter of the bona fides of NOSENKO, this category is probably
the most difficult in which to present a logical position with factual
support. There are too many intangible aspects involved and although
motivation is an important factor; full resolution of the motivation
problem is not a paramount factor in deciding whether NOSENKO is or
is not a dispatched agent. . NOSENKO could have contacted this Agency in
1962 and defected in 1964 without KGB knowledge and yet even at this late
date have failed to disclose some important events of a personal nature.
which actually were important ingredients in his ultimate decision.
Defectors are humans and have at least the normal reluctance to admit
unfavorable information which they consider of a personal nature.
On 31 October 1967 NOSENKO, following a request, furnished a
handwritten memorandum on the topic of his motivation, a typed copy of
which is attached. The memorandum, although not grammatically correct,
is quite understandable and is worthy of review. The tenor of the memo-
randum is one of increasing disillusionment with the Soviet regime.
SECRET
6001051
---
## Page 58
SECRET
NOSENKO and others of his generation have lived in a Soviet society
throughout their entire lives. The environment is an important factor
of influence in the life of an individual and true disillusionment is at
best usually a gradual process in which many factors, some recognized
and some not recognized by the individual, have played a role in varying
degrees.
NOSENKO, until 1955 and possibly until the death of his father
in August 1956, could be compared to the profligate son of wealthy
parents in the United States who finally graduates from college and obtains
employment perhaps in the firm of his father without actually earning any of
the luxuries he has enjoyed. The father of NOSENKO was not only wealthy
by Soviet standards but also held a high government position. The
influence of his father and the name of his father undoubtedly was an
important if not the most important factor in NOSENKO even being
permitted to enter the Naval RU and the KGB even though NOSENKO is
particularly reluctant to admit, perhaps even to himself, that this was
the primary reason.
The above should not be construed as any reflection on the
actual intelligence of NOSENKO, but rather as an explanation of how
NOSENKO could have even entered the Naval RU and KGB. His
2
SECRFT
0001652
---
## Page 59
SECRET
performance in both prior to 1956 by his own admission was such that
he probably would have been summarily terminated if he had not been
the son of the capable, respected Minister of Shipbuilding.
If a certain amount of speculation is permitted, the
disillusionment of NOSENKO, who lost many personal advantages
following the death of his father including a personal automobile, may
have actually started soon after the death of his father. That NOSENKO
is undisciplined is supported by his admissions relative to his life in
the USSR and his behavior both in 1962 in Geneva and for a period of time
after his defection in 1964. NOSENKO was addicted to women, liquor, and
the material things which can be purchased with money or obtained through
influence.
A question has been previously raised regarding his motivation
in contacting CIA in 1962, particularly his statement that he needed money
and would sell "two pieces of information." NOSENKO has stated that he
wanted to make a contact with the Americans, that he was not emotionally
ready to defect, but that he subconsciously believed that if he made a
contact he would be making an ultimate commitment from which he could
no longer retreat.
3
0001053
SECRET
---
## Page 60
14-00000
NOSENKO has stated that he gave considerable thought to the
best way to contact the Americans so that he would be believed and not
rejected and came to the conclusion that he would offer to sell some
information. NOSENKO stated that he thought if he approached the
Americans stating he was a "KGB counterintelligence officer who wanted
to give information," he would not have been believed and would have
been peremptorily rejected. NOSENKO stated he had difficulty deciding.
how much money to ask for and how to make the approach, but finally
decided to do it through David MARK)whom the KGB considered was with
American Intelligence.
The above
statements by NOSENKO are not in conflict with the
record. NOSENKO did offer to sell "two pieces of information," almost
immediately gave more information, made no significant demands for
money, and in fact his price for "two pieces of information" was
ridiculously low by American standards. NOSENKO has during current
interviews stated, as he first stated in 1962, that he had spent excessive
amounts of money in one or two riotous evenings. However, NOSENKO
has during current interviews stated that he could have covered his
expenditures by other means without receiving any money from the
Americans.
4
6001054
---
## Page 61
NOSENKO has stated that the sight before his departure from
Ganeva to the USSR he gave serious thougài to defection but was not
emotionnily ndmpted to delect at that time. Following bia saturn to the
Sortel Valon, NOSENKO, during a period of time, made his final
decision to defect at the firet opportunity, realising that it reant
leaving his wie, childres, and otber members of his family la the
Some aspects of the motivation of NOSENKO are obacure and
will probably so remain. Il moald be proferable li an exuet detuliod
chronology of all the lactore involvod could be prepared or 11 ever
certain obvious factors could be accurately delinented. These ars both
Imponsible at this time and probably at say time in the future. What
in Important at this timo lo a decimion an to whether the motivation ol
NOSENKO wan baond on personal ressons with no implications of KCB
dispatch. It la considered that the explasazion of NOSKNKO concerning
bin motivation 1s acceptable and thai hin tatement that no one escept
the Americans was aware of his contacts with the Americane in 1962
Of bis istoni to defaci in 1964 1a supported by otbes Information of a
collateral astaro. (See Secton Ill, H.)
Attachment:
Typed cpy Memo from NOSENKO
5
GECRET
6001055
---
## Page 62
Operational Memo # N-4
SUBJECT: NOSENKO, Yuri Ivanovich
The following is a typed copy of a handwritten memorandum
furnished by Subject on 1 November 1967, following a request on
31 October 1967:
What were the motif and the reasons which have led me to
the decision to breake with the Soviet Russia? The only definite is an
understanding of the situation in the Soviet Russia, the knowledge of
the methods of the communist regime, the knowledge of the real foreign
and interior policies of the Soviet government and the faith in the right
neis of the free world.
It was not a decision which was accepted or could be accepted
in a month or a year. This decision was slowly growing in me. I'
think that the beginning was in the studentship.
Living with my parents and being in the circles of the parent's
and my acquaintances I knew more then there was written in newspapers
and periodice and that was propagandized by radio and TV. Working in
the Far East and later being in trips in different regione and cities of
Russia I found out much better the life and conditions of the life of the
people of the Soviet Russia.
SECRET
GRoUP 1
Facinder frens aulemalle?
6001056
---
## Page 63
When I worked 11 years in MVD-KGB I understood and found
out very many things, details and the real deal of the existing regime,
about methods of the work of MGB-MVD-KGB and about their doings,
about hundreds of thousands of the people of Russia who were (and
still are) considered "politically'' dangerous and around whom was
(and atill is) going an active work of all organs KGB.
At the same time when I was several times abroad I have
seen personally the so-called "decay" at the West. I have seen in
reality how is living people.
Several times when I was abroad I was thinking about staying
at the West and not returning in Russia, but only one thing was keeping
me - my family.
In 1962 in Switzerland I made the acquaintance with the
Americans. From my part "the sell of the information" was a real
show. I was thinking that they would not believe me otherwise. In
that period of the time there was going a big struggle in me to stay
abroad or to return home till the last days of living in Geneva and even
when I was returning home in Vienna.
In 1962-1963 I decided definitely that I did not want and could
not live more in the Soviet Russia. In this period of time I have done
all my best to go as soon as possible abroad.
2
0001657
---
## Page 64
14-00000
VIVIL
It was not easy to make this decision, it was very difficult
to leave the family for ever..
And now in spite of everything I do not regret.
0001058
3
SFPPET
---
## Page 65
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 66
SECRET
D. IS THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY NOSENKO TO CIA
CONCERNING KGB OPERATIONS, PERSONALITIES,
AND ORGANIZATION REASONABLY COMMENSURATE
WITH HIS CLAIMED KGB CAREER?
SECRET
Excludes.
Cancereling cal
0001059
---
## Page 67
SECRET.
D. Is the information furnished by NOSENKO to CIA concerning
KGB operations, personalities, and organization reasonably commen-
surate with his claimed KGB career? The conclusion is that the infor
mation furnished by NOSENKO concerning KGB operations, personalities,
and organization is more than reasonably commensurate with his claimed
career in the KGB from mid-March 1953 to his defection in early February
1964.
In reaching the above conclusion, consideration has been given
to his claimed departmental assignments and claimed positions in each
department.. Certain allowance has been made for faulty memory with
consideration being given to whether there is any indication of deception
or whether the failure to recall a particular item of interest can logically
be attributed to the vagaries of the human mind. There is, of course, nu
accurate standard of measurement which would permit a positive deter
mination as to whether inability to recall certain details or events is
actually due to the fact that the human mind cannot recall all past events
or could be attributed to willful deception.
SECRET
GhOUP 1
Excluded from automatici
downgrading and
declassilication
0001C60
---
## Page 68
An effort has been made to determine if there are any particular
patterns or areas where NOSENKO has indicated he did not recall
specific matters or certain details, and no pattern or specific areas
have been noted. NOSENKO, in fact, has an unusually good memory
as evidenced by the extensive information furnished by NOSENKO purely
from recollection. In addition, there has been no material reluctance
on the part of NOSENKO to discuss his entire life, KGB officers he has
known, KGB organization and procedures, or other topica of interest.
NOSENKO has furnished considerable detail concerning KGB
officers whom he has known at various periods in his: entire KGB career.
He has been very consistent in information furnished and has frequently
added certain details which he recalled at a later date.
Certain remarks will be made in another section in regard to
the volume and scope of information furnished by NOSENKO. This in-
formation is not selective, but is an excellent indicator that NOSENKO
was assigned to the First Department and Seventh Department, SCD,
during the claimed periods of time and held the claimed positions. Con-
sideration has been given to his various claimed KGB assignments in
evaluating the information furnished in an effort to assess whether his
indicated knowledge was commensurate with his claimed position during
2
0001061
SECRET
---
## Page 69
SEEMAL
a particular period of time or suggested the possibility that he did not
occupy the position which he claimed to have held.
It is considered that information furnished by NOSENKO supports
his claimed positions in the SCD. It has not been possible to substantially
confirm through collateral sources that NOSENKO served in bis claimed
positions. Neither has it been possible to obtain from other sources an
applicable description of the duties or responsibilities of an individual
holding any of the positions NOSENKO claimed to have held after 1958. It
is felt there can be no question that NOSENKO served in the capacities of
junior case officer, case officer, and senior case officer during 1953 - 1957.
As regards the duties and responsibilities of a Deputy Chief of Section,
Chief of Section, and Deputy Chief of Department, and whether NOSENKO
held these various claimed positions, a considerable amount of personal
judgment has been necessary. This personal judgment has been made in
as judicial a manner as possible, with full knowledge that any opinion in
regard to the above is largely dependent upon information from NOSENKO.
NOSENKO bas compiled detailed diagrams of the actual offices
he claims to have occupied and surrounding offices during the four pri-
mary periods of time: 1953 - 1955, 1955 - 1959, 1960 - 1961, and 1962 -
1963. He has
prepared specific memoranda concerning his co-officers
3
0001C62
SECRET
---
## Page 70
and other personnel, and changes of personnel, as well as diagrams
of the offices of the Chief and Deputy Chiefs of the SCD during 1956 -
1964. This material is internally consistent. Furthermore NOSENKO
could not possibly have known that this detailed information could not
immediately be checked for accuracy, at least in part, with a source
or another officer who has defected since mid-1964. If these diagrams
and memoranda were not relatively correct, NOSENKO, who is quite
astute in matters of counterintelligence, would hardly have voluntarily
prepared the material in such detail. This type of information is
peculiarly adaptable for analysis by a knowledgeable source or by another
defector and could, if not relatively correct, permit a rather positive con-
clusion that NOSENKO was lying or fabricating information.
NOSENKO has furnished quite specific information on KGB
operations during the 1953 - 1955, 1955 - 1959, 1960 - 1961, and 1962 -
1963 periods of time. As might be expected, his specific knowledge is
less for the 1953 - 1955 period; but his own personal situation and attitude
until 1955 - 1956, which are mentioned elsewhere, should be given
consideration. In any event, he has furnished adequate information so
that his claimed assignment during 1953 - 1955 is considered sufficiently
substantiated even though his actual job performance undoubtedly
deserved a low rating.
6001063
SECRET
---
## Page 71
SEORET
The knowledge of NOSENKO concerning cases, KGB operations,
and other officers can consistently be related to his claimed department
and position assignment during the 1953 to January 1964 period. The
scope of his knowledge of his own department when considered in toto
is broader after 1957 than before, which is compatible with his claim of
increased responsibilities. His knowledge of the work of other departments
of the SCD from the late 1950's on is also more extensive, whick is also a
further indication that NOSENKO actually held the claimed positions
during this period of time.
5
SECRET
0001084
---
## Page 72
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 73
SECRET
-E.
CAN THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY NOSENKO BE
CONSIDERED IN TOTO AS HAVING RESULTED
IN MATERIAL DAMAGE TO THE KGB AND/OR HAS
THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY NOSENKO BEEN OF
SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT TO WESTERN INTELLIGENCE?
0001065
SECRET
GROUP 1
Excluded tron automatie
downaradlag and
deciascillestion
---
## Page 74
* 87
SECRET
E. Can the information furnished by NOSENKO be considered
in toto as having resulted in material damage to the KGB and/or has
the information furnished by NOSENKO been of significant beneit to
Western Intelligence? The conclusion in regard to both of the above
questions is affirmative, even though it is realized that ultimate loss
to the KGB and ultimate benefit to Western Intelligence are both partly
of an intangible nature and not susceptible to accurate measurement.
NOSENKO has, as previously indicated, furnished voluminous
information during current and previous interviews. An accurate total
oi specific cases is not possible at this time and would at best be only
an interesting figure, the actual significance of waich would be marginal.
Practically every interview with NOSENKO, even at present, reveals
information oi counterintelligence interest and it is expected that this
production can continue for a considezable period of time. This should
not be construed as an indication thai NOSENKO is intentionally with -
colding information, but rather that stimulation of his memory tarougà
normal questions and discussions has been and can continue to be
productave.
SEGRET ser
Cannerog 075
0001066
---
## Page 75
NOSENKO has furnished information concerning perhaps 2, 00)
KGB officers and |300)KGB agents or operative contacts (here the terms
agents
or operative contacts are used io refer to Soviet nationals),
mainly in the Second Chief Directorate or internal KGB organizations.
However, he has identified approximately (250 former or current First
Chief Directorate officers and there is a considerable exchange of
officers between the FCD and SCD. In addition, numerous officers
of the SCD and other internal KGB organizations travel abroad with
delegations, tourist groups, and as visitors to various major exhibitions
such as World's Fairs. It is impossible at this time to estimate the
number of KGB officers identified by NOSENKO who have been outside
the Soviet Bloc since his defection or who will be out sometime in the
future.
There has been very little attempted exploitation of information
furnished'by NOSENKO concerning other XGB officers and, therefore,
the possible value of this information to United States Intelligence
cannot be estimated nor can the potential damage to the KGB be esti-
mated.
Disclosure of information concerning certain KGB officers would
be a necessary part of any dispatch oi a KGB agent or oíficei to the
West either íor purposes of contact with Western Intelligence for a
2
S50P-
0001667
---
## Page 76
14-00000
limited period oi time or for the placing of the individual in a defector
staius. However, identification of KGB officers or agents to Western
Intelligence is necessarily a matter of concern to the KGB and the ex-
posure of the identities of approximately (2, 000)KGB officers and (several)
(hundred) KGB agents could not be considered of negligible importance.
Obtaining specific information in regard to KGB officers or
KGB assets is important to United States Intelligence and a consider-
able amount of manpower and money is spent on this activity. Even
acknowledging that it is much more difficult for CIA to obtain this type
of information about the KGB, which operates in a closed society, than
it is for the KGB to obtain the identity of CIA employees, it is believed
doubtiul any reader of this summary would consider that the identifi-
cation of 2, 000 CIA employees and(several hundred) agent assets to
the KGB would be any less than a very serious compromise of valuable
information.
Prior to the defection of NOSENIO, little was known of the
organization of the SCD or other internal KGB organizations. The
information provided by NOSENKO concerning both has been detailed
and extensive. That this information is of value to the United States
intelligence community is hardly subject io dispute, althouga analysts
(
3
6001068
---
## Page 77
SECRET
can differ as to the weight which should be given to the value of this
type of information.
NOSENKO has furnished information concerning SCD, KGB,
recruitments of United States citizens and foreign nationals covering
the period of 1953 through 1963. This should not be interpreted as a
statement that NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to all
SCD recruitments, even of Americans, during this period.. His infor-
mation based on personal knowledge is in general limited to the First
Department and Seventh Department.
He has furnished information
concerning cases of several other departments in the SCD and some
FCD cases, but this information was in general acquired indirectly
from social or business conversations with other KGB officers.
NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to a number of
cases which were previously known to United States Intelligence. While
the value of such information cannot be considered high, the additional
details which NOSENKO has provided in a number of cases cannot be
dismissed as being of no value to Western Intelligence, even if the
information cannot be regarded as damaging to the KGB. Furthermore,
inasmuch as there is no reason to question his sourcing of information
already known, there is no basis for suspicion of NOSENKO for his
having provided such information.
0001069
CE0027
---
## Page 78
NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to a number of
recruitments. by the KGB of non-Bloc nationals who were known by
Western Intelligence to be pro-Communist or even connected with
Communist organizations. The identification as a recruited KGB
agent of an individual previously known to be pro-Communist is of
considerable value to Western Intelligence and may be considered to
have resulted in some damage to the KGB. Admittedly, the potential
to the KGB of an agent who is known as pro-Communist is less than
that of a "politically clean" individual. However, "pro-Communist"
or even "Communist" are not synonymous with "recruited KGB agent."
NOSENKO has furnished additional information on cases in
which there was some previous but limited information. In a number
of these instances the additional information from NOSENKO has per-
mitted identification of the individuals of interest and the closing of an
"'Unknown Subject'' case. In such instances the information from
NOSENKO must be considered valuable to Western Intelligence since
the incomplete information known previously would in many cases not
have permitted ultimate identification of the individual of interest.
This category of cases must be considered as having resulted in damage
to the KGB and in benefit to Western Intelligence.
5
0001070
SECRET
---
## Page 79
NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to a number of
individuals, both American and non-Bloc foreign, who were recruited
by the KGB and concerning whom Western Intelligence had no significant
information. It is recognized that certain of these cases mentioned by
NOSENKO, particularly in the tourist category, would probably never
lave actually materialized as productive KGB agents. This could be
for various reasons including later refusal to cooperate, later geo-
graphical inaccessibility to the KGB, or not being either at the time
of SCD recruitment or later in a position to furnish information of
interest to the KGB. In this regard, NOSENKO has stated that at least
until 1962 there was a definite tendency in the Seventh Department to
make a "recruitment" as a statistic for the end-of-year report even
though it was apparent the agent at the time had no potential and that
it was highly unlikely there would be a potential in the future.
NOSENKO has furnished information on or leads to a number of
cases, primarily third nationals but some American, in which he has
beer unable to furnish sufficient details to permit identification at this
time. In certain instances it is believed that an identification will be
possible after additional research and investigation. Until an identi-
fication is made, the value of any particular lead to Western Intelli-
gence cannot be estimated, but thai there may be a potential value
0001071
6
SEGME
-as so una
---
## Page 80
14-00000
cannot be ignored. As an example of this category, NOSENKO has
furnished a lead, still under investigation, to an unidentified agent,
probably not an American, who in 1962 was in a position to remove
the "NATO Emergency Codes," deliver the codes to the KGB for
photographing, and then successfully replace the codes. Because the
agent is as yet unidentified, his current access to information affecting
the security of the United States cannot be gauged.
In all, the information from NOSENKO in the category of cases
where Western Intelligence did not previously have significant infor-
mation must be considered on balance as having resúlted in material
damage to the KGB and of significant benefit to Western Intelligence.
Quantity alone of CI or FI information from a KGB defector is
not a standard on which to judge bona fides.. The question is whether
the amount of his information is reasonably commensurate with his
claimed positions in the KGB. This question as regards NOSENKO
has been examined, with affirmative findings, in another section of
this paper:
A few examples from the above cited categories of information
furnished by NOSENKO are listed below. These cases are given as
illustrations and are not necessarily listed in order of importance.
7
SECR
SOREA
0001072
---
## Page 81
Ile case oi Robert Lee JOHNSON and the related case of
James Allen MINTKENBAUGH have been covered in the previous
summary. It can be considered that doth were exposed as a result
of a lead from NOSENKO which led to suspicions of JOHNSON.
Another American case is that of Herbert HOWARD, a USIA;
employee who spent considerable time in the USSR in 1962 - 1963.
NOSENKO identified Herbert HOWARD/as having been recruited by.
the First Section, First Departmeat, SCD, in 1962 and was positive
that (HOWARD) furnished valuable information to the KGB. When
interviewed in 1964, HOWARD did not admit he had beer recruited,
but suspicion of HOWARD was greai enough so that ais contract with
USIA) was not renewed.
Li indeed HOWARD was recruited by the KGB, it is impossible
to determine how much information would have been compromised by
HOWARD; while in the USSR, he did have certain access to the United
States Embassy. There is good reason to believe that if HOWARD) was
recruited, it was he who was responsible for the compromise of a
potentially valuabie Soviet walk-in with whom CIA was attempting to
establish contact using HOWARD)as intermediary.
NOSENKO in 1964 furnished information in regard to a "ZHARI"
(apparently a KGB code name, although NOSENKO thought it was a true
8
0001073
9500E7
---
## Page 82
mare). Ho identifled "ZHARI" (phonetic) as an Americas code clerk
Who delocted to the USSR in 1961. As Internal assumptloa was made
annod on the original lend information from NOSENKO that "ZHARI"
WaA VICtor NOSIis HAMILTON, abA FOur Mitri HINDALY, & fOrMAT
NSA eroplayne who defectad to the USSR In 1962, and the information
¡TOm NOSINKO was never dissemianted or Investigated.
Pitor to the surfacing of John Diacoe SMITH by the Sovieta
Ra tan tall of 1967,
Inlormation conceraing KGB knowledge
of Anare code clerks was being taventigated; and John Dineor
SaLt was t lending suspoct. After tan surfacing of SMITH by to
Soulets, It became apparent that SMITH, rather than HAMILTON, Was
Identical to "ZHARI." Invastigation dlacioned thns so dafiaito iritorias.
ton could be established in regard to the actual wbereaboute of SMITH
after circh mid-1960. It cannot be positivaly sinted font appropriate
tavestigation la 1964 of the "ZHARI" load would have led to the identi-
fleation of John Discos SMITH as "ZHARI," However, much identifi-
cation would bavo been of considerable intarent to the Department ol
State and ClA, and could vry wall have perraitted cortala notion which
would savo al least lessened the propaganda effect of ta surprina
announcement by the Soviora in the fall of 1967.
NOSENKO, in June 1962, farniahed Information from walch
Wulliam VASSALL could ba quicily identifled. GOLITSYN, la late
1960 - carly 1961, bad furnished Isformation concerning a Soviet pene-
¡Taton of la Britai Goveramant on to badio oilst la Britieb
9
SECRFT
---
## Page 83
Services had complled a list al twenty suspects, Including VASSALL.
Iven thoagh is may be presumed thas investigation of the twenty muspecta
mould ultimataly have resulted in & determination that VASSALi was
the agent on whom GOLITSYN had furnisbed certain information, the
information from NOSENKO in June 1962 resulted in the eariler termi-
nation by the British Servicen of a still valuable productive KGB agent.
Although not the cane of a KGB agent, the matter of the micro-
phones is the United States Embanny should also be mentioned.
GOLITSYN, following his defection in December 1961, furniahed
certain information in regard to microphones in the United States
Embaany (Chascary), Since in fact the microphones were connected
so contral cables, location of one microphone moald logically bave led
so the exposure ol the entira set of micsophones. However, appro-
priate action was not taxon on this information and the KGB would have
been aware that no action was taken prior to june 1962 when NOSENKO
flat contacted CLA.
I NOSINKO Is a dispatched KGB agent, it is not clear way the
KGB would attract specifie attention to a syatem of microphones which
2n5t have still had some value an ol June 1962. A presumption may
Do mado ta: 11 NOSENKO was a dispatched agent, the KGB bad, us of
1962, an advanced system of montioring devices walch rendered the
abova microphone system obsolete. Howaves, so concrate evidence
of nuch an advanced system in available and it should be noted that it
10
CEORET
0001075
---
## Page 84
isolat
was not until circa April 1964 that any effective action was taken to
locate and remove the microphone system to which GOLITSYN had
given a lead in late December 1961 - early January 1962.
A few general comments in regard to the CI information fur-
nished by NOSENKO wald be appropriate in this particular section.
As regards leads furnished by NOSENKO to American cases, most
of these leads have been mentioned in the previous summary. Current
interviews with NOSENKO have resulted in approximately seventeen
new American leads which are being examined by the FBI. The inter-
views have also resulted in more specific information in regard to à
number of cases previously mentioned by NOSENKO, thus permitting
additional development of these cases by the FBI.
NOSENKO has provided leads to over 100 third-country KGB
agents. Geographically these leads are wide in scope, including
nationals of such countries as Indonesia, Austria, Uruguay, the United
Kingdom, France, West Germany, Belgium, Sweden, Australia, Japan,
Mexico, Italy, and a number of other countries.
included in the more important of these agent or other leads
are leads to high levels of government and intelligence to code clerks,
to access agenis fo: American ¡argeis, to actual or possible illegal
0001076
---
## Page 85
SEU
support assets. Also included are foreign correspondents,
repre-
sentatives of foreign tourist firms, and foreign tourists.
A summary of the foreign leads arbitrarily defined as of major
significance shows nineteen leads highly placed or formerly highly
placed in their own government, four code clerks; eight cases involving
definite American interest, and four access agents to Americans. It also
shows nine instances of clandestine KGB activity against foreign missions
in Moscow, including actual KGB clandestine access into certain Western
Embassies (but not the British or American Embassies).
NOSENKO has also furnished leads to certain FCD foreign
national agents, his information on several being derived during his
three months in Geneva in 1962.
It is impossible to give an exact evaluation of the significance
of the foreign leads furnished by NOSENKO. That they are of signi-
ficant value to Western Intelligence and damaging to the KGB is hardly
subject to dispute. This evaluation must be given even though there
are numerous foreign leads which have not been adequately exploited
ai this time. '
As a final note, the implied conclusion in the previous summary
is accepted that the failure of NOSENKO to provide usable positive
12
200733
0001026/2
---
## Page 86
OLUNLI
Inselligence Information la no? s signilleant factor in a determination
of his bons Ades. The qualification should, howeves, be added that
131= 10t lels tas NOSENKO has, an of this time, bean lally debrieled
in many areas of positive intolligence interest.
13
SECRET
0001077
---
## Page 87
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 88
14-00000
F. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF KCB DECEPTION OR "GIVE AWAY"
IN INFORMATION FURNISHED BY NOSENKO WHICH
WOULD WARRANT A CONCLUSION THAT NOSENKO
WAS DISPATCHED BY THE KGB?
0001078
COUP 1
Exeladed from cotomatic
SECRET
---
## Page 89
SECRET
F. Is there evidence of KGB deception or "give away" in
information furnished by NOSENKO which would warrant a conclusion
that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB? The conclusion in this
summary is that NOSENKO was not dispatched by the KGB. In
reaching this conclusion, a full examination of the above question has
been both a necessary and integral part.
It is inherent that the volume of information furnished by
NOSENKO is only one of the factors which should be given consideration
in arriving at a conclusion that NOSENKO was or was not dispatched by
the KGB. If NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB, the KGB would have
surely been willing to sacrifice certain information of value to the KGB
in order to support the bona fides of NOSENKO. However, if NOSENKO
was dispatched, it must have been to accomplish or further a KGB
purpose or mission, the nature of which has been and continues to be
unknown.
An examination of the circumstances under which NOSENKO first
contacted CIA in Geneva in 1962 and his behavior during these contacts is
particularly pertinent since during this period of time NOSENKO would
have surely been under direct KGB control if there are any implications
of KGB dispatch in the NOSENKO case.
Cüur 1
Cond ten dilamatic
SECRET
0001079
---
## Page 90
NOSENKO has stated that his original approach to "sell two
pieces of information' was his own idea as to what was most likely to
be successful. NOSENKO has stated that he wanted to make a contact
with the Americans, was not psychologically adapted to defect at the
time, and felt that if he merely stated that be was a "KGB counter-
intelligence officer who wanted to give information, " he very possibly
would be rejected. It should be noted that NOSENKO even during his
first contact did not limit his remarks to the "two pieces of information"
and began to talk quite freely on other matters.
If NOSENKO was dispatched, it is felt that he, during his 1962
contacts, would have been very carefully briefed and that his remarks
or statements would have not been of a nature which could cause any
suspicion in regard to the bona fides of NOSENKO. Instead. a current
review of his statements and remarks during his five contacts in 1962
indicate that his many errors, exaggerations, and actual lies were quite
likely typical of a braggadocio element in the personality of NOSENKO
and may also have been evidence supporting the statement by NOSENKO
that he usually had a few drinks of liquor before each contact in
Geneva.
0001080
SECRET
---
## Page 91
SECRET
NOSENKO, during his five contacts in Geneva, made many
statements which in retrospect were impossible, and the investigation
of which could only have raised certain questions concerning NOSENKO:
The following is a list of the more obvious areas in which NOSENKO
made gross exaggerations or made incorrect or impossible statements.
(a) NOSENKO claimed he personally was with
Oleg M. GRIBANOV, Chief of the SCD, during the
recruitment pitch to James STORSBERG. (This was
a lie and an interview with STORSBERG)with display
of photograph would have disclosed that NOSENKO
did not participate.)
(b) NOSENKO was involved in the recruitment
approach to Russell LANGELLE. (This was a lie and
LANGELLE was available for interview.)
(C) NOSENKO said he recruited LUNT (Horace;
(LUNT) in Bulgaria. (Actually NOSENKO never met
(LUNT.)
3
6001081
SECRET
---
## Page 92
SEGRET
(d) NOSENKO claimed personal contact with (Edmund)
STEVENS who,
according to NOSENKO, had been recruited
by the KGB. (NOSENKO actually had never personally met
(STEVENS and only had seen(STEVENS) once at a distance.)
(e) NOSENKO dated the recruitment of "ANDREY"
in Moscow as 1949-1950. At the same time he furnished
information that "ANDREY" (who is considered identical to
. Dayle Wallis SMITH) was in Moscow during a part of the time
that Roy RHODES, also a recruited agent, was assigned to
Moscow, 1951-1953. "ANDREY" (SMITH) was actually in
Moscow 1952-1954.
(f) NOSENKO said be, GRIBANOV, and another officer
met Edward Ellis SMITH. (NOSENKO has since stated he did
not meet SMITH and that his only role was obtaining a foreign
typewriter and paper for a KGB agent involved in the SMITH
operation.)
(g) NOSENKO in a number of instances spoke in the
first person, saying "We did this," or "We did that, " in
reference
to
a particular KGB activity in whick be now admits
0001082
SECRET
---
## Page 93
he was not involved but had some knowledge. (If
NOSENKO was under KGB control in 1962, both he
and the KGB should have known that these indicated
exaggerations would eventually lead to a question
concerning the bona fides of NOSENKO. )
In 1962-1963 a number of similarities were noted between
information furnished by NOSENKO and information which had been
furnished by GOLITSYN prior to June 1962. These similarities were
quite striking and gave riseto certain suspicions of NOSENKO because
he provided information which the KGB would presumably have considered
already compromised as a result of the defection of GOLITSYN. Certain
of the similarities at the time could only be explained in terms of
NOSENKO being a dispatched agent. The following are some examples of
the similarities noted.
(a) Both furnished information in regard to
(Johan PREISFREUND!
(b) Both furnished information in regard to a
military code clerk case (James STORSBERG).
(c) Both furnished information in regard to a
trip of Vladislav KOVSHUK, under an assumed name,
to the United States. (GOLITSYN was sure it was
connected with a reactivation of an agent formerly in
5
0001285
---
## Page 94
Moscow, or a recruitment of an American formerly
with the United States Embassy in Moscow; and NOSENKO
related it directly to the "ANDREY" case, giving the
assumed name which KOVSHUK used. )
(d) Both furnished information in regard to
microphones in the United States Embassy in Moscow.
(e) Both furnished information in regard to
Edmund STEVENS and Isaac Henry SHAPIRO!
The above list is not complete nor does it indicate the actual
differences in the amount of information furnished on any particular
topic by GOLITSYN and NOSENKO. To cite the above in detail in this
summary is believed unnecessary since the only point of real interest
is whether the fact that NOSENKO was aware of certain events, cases,
or situations of which GOLITSYN was also aware raises a legitimate
question concerning the bona fides of NOSENKO.
The above area of concern has been thoroughly examined and
it is considered that the fact that NOSENKO furnished some information
on certain cases or situations previously mentioned in lesser or
greater detail by GOLITSYN cannot logically be construed as evidence
0001084
6
SECRET
---
## Page 95
SECREI
that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB. NOSENKO has during
current interviews satisfactorily sourced his information in almost
every instance. In a few instances he has said he did not recall
how be learned of a particular piece of information but these
apparent lapses of memory were not large in number and are
considered to be in no way suspicious.
The general area in which there was a similarity between
information furnished by GOLITSYN in late 1961 - early.1962 and
information furnished by NOSENKO in June 1962 and which would have
been the most significant insofar as the security of the United States
Government was or is concerned related to certain activities centering
around or in the First Department, SCD.
It is the conclusion of this summary that NOSENKO was an
officer of the First Section, First Department, SCD, during 1953-1955
and was Deputy Chief of the same section in 1960 - 1961. Therefore,
the fact that NOSENKO furnished information concerning certain cases
or situations in the First Department and the fact that GOLITSYN
furnished information concerning the same case or situation is not
unusual or necessarily suspicious. NOSENKO has stated that GOLITSYN
0001085
cont
---
## Page 96
SECRE?
knew and was in contact with other officers of the First Section and
GOLITSYN has attributed his knowledge of certain cases or activities
of the First Department, SCD, primarily to his association with
certain officers in the First Department, SCD.
It is recognized that there are certain conflicts in information
furnished by GOLITSYN and NOSENKO and at this time it is not
possible to satisfactorily correlate certair information from GOLITSYN
with information from NOSENKO. Pages 162 - 163 of the previous
summary refer to information from GOLITSYN which is characterized
as "Information about KGB Operations Agairst Embassy Code Clerks in
1960 - 1961. " The references are to information from GOLITSYN baseo
on remarks by Gennadiy Ivanovich GRYAZNOV and Vadim Viktorovich
KOSOLAPOV of the First Section, First Department, SCD, and an
officer of the Second Section, First Department, SCD.
NOSENKO has stated that he was Deputy Chief of the First
Section, First Department, SCD, during 1960 - 19ó1, that his primary
responsibility was work against code clerks at the United States Embassy
in Moscow, and that both KOSOLAPOV and GRYAZNOV were engaged in
the same work and under his supervision. The siatement by GOLITSYN
8
SECRET
6001086
---
## Page 97
that NOSENKO was not Deputy Chief of the First Section in 1960 has
been noted and commented on in another section of this summary.
GOLITSYN has furnished certain information which he re-
ceived from officers of the First Section, First Department, SCD.
In each instance where this information, which was fragmentary, could
not be immediately correlated with information from NOSENKO, it was
previously considered to be evidential of deception or lying on the part
of, NOSENKO. This position, however, failed to allow for the possibility
that the discrepancies between the two sources were; at least in certain
instances, more apparent than real.
In certain instances it has now been possible to correlate frag-
mentary information from GOLITSYN with information from NOSENKO,
making it evident that in these instances the differences could not be
construed as in any way reflecting against NOSENKO. The four examples
cited below represent two probable correlations, (a) and (b); one possible
correlation, (c); and one instance where no correlation is possible at this
time, (d):
(a) GOLITSYN furnished information which he
received in April-May 1960 from Gennadiy GRYAZNOV
that an attempt had been made by the KGB to recruit an
0001087
9
SECRET
---
## Page 98
14-00000
SECRET
American female employee of the American Embassy
in Moscow through a male Soviet friend, but that the
attempt had failed. GOLITSYN also furnisbed information
that the woman had left Moscow by the time be learned of
the information but that the Soviets hoped she would return
to Moscow so that further work could be undertaken to
effect her recruitment. He did not recall the name of the
secretary, but did recall that it was al long and "German)
sounding" name.
NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to a
recruitment attempt against Collette SCHWARZENBACH)
who it is considered is identical to the "American secretary"
referred to by GOLITSYN. However, (SCHWARZENBACH)
(was not a female secretary in the American Embassy, but)
had been employed as a secretary to the wife of Ambassador)
BOHLEN during 1955 - 1956 and from 1958 - 1959 was employed)
las a correspondent by the United Press in Moscow.) The
recruitment attempt against SCHWARZENBACH, according to
NOSENKO, occurred in 1959 and was an operation of the First
Section, First Department, SCD.
0001088
10
REPOCT
---
## Page 99
14-00000
SECRET
(b) Page 163 of the previous summary contains infor-
mation that GOLITSYN also learned from GRYAZNOV in
the spring of 1960 that GRYAZNOV had developed an operation
against an American Embassy military code clerk in which the
KGB was "99 per cent sure" that the target would be recruited.
This is believed to undoubtedly be a reference to the case of
(James STORSBERG)who was actually the subject of a recruit-
ment approach in 1961.
There is considered to be a good possibility that
GOLITSYN actually learned of the above information from
GRYAZNOV in early January 1961 when he was again in Moscow
rather than during the spring of 1960 when GOLITSYN was
preparing for his assignment to Helsinki, Finland. This
theory is supported by information on page 163 of the previous
summary that GOLITSYN has stated he learned in January
1961 from Vladislav M. KOVSHUK (Chief of the First Section)
that Johan PREISFREUND) had recently been used in the
successful recruitment of an American employee of the
Embassy. (Johan PREISFREUND) was used in the(STORSBERG'
operation,
according to NOSENKO, and NOSENKO was also
0001089
11
SECRET
---
## Page 100
14-00000
SECRET
aware that GOLITSYN had a conversation with KOVSHUK about
PREISFREUND since GOLITSYN wanted to use (PREISFREUND
in Helsinki. NOSENKO has stated he was
not present during
the above conversation. It is very possible that KOVSHUK
exaggerated a little in his conversation with GOLITSYN in the
matter of way GOLITSYN could not use PREISFREUND as an
agent.
NOSENKO has furnished extensive information in regard
to the James SIORSBERG case and with due consideration to
the accuracy and recollection of GOLITSYN, there does not
appear to be an adequate basis for questioning the bona fides of
NOSENKO on the basis of the differences between the report-
ing by GOLITSYN of information he received from GRYAZNOV
concerning what is considered to have been the James)
STORSBERG case and detailed information furnished by
NOSENKO concerning the James STORSBERG case.
The
exact date of the recruitment attempt against STORSBERG)
has not been positively established, but it is considered to
have occurred before early May 1961 and probably in the
March-April 1961 period.
The statement by James /
6001090
12
SECRET
---
## Page 101
SECRET
STORSBERG that it occurred in October 1961 is com-
pletely unacceptable and is even contradicted by other
statements by STORSBERG himself.
(c) Page 163 of the previous summary contains
information from GOLITSYN which he had received from
GRYAZNOV in April or May 1960 that an American
employee of the Embassy in Moscow was either recruited
or prepared for recruitment on the basis of a homosexual
compromise beginning in 1959 and concluding in 1960.
The previous summary also states that according to
GOLITSYN, the KGB had photographed the American in
various homosexual acts, but SHELEPIN, who had just
become Chairman of the KGB, was at the time stressing
ideological rather than blackmail recruitments. SHELEPIN
did not exclude future use of the photographs which the KGB
would hold in reserve.
NOSENKO has furnished information concerning the
homosexual compromise of Robert BARRETT, who was a
guide at the United States Exhibition in Moscow in 1959, and
with whom "SHMELEV" and "GRIGORIY", two homosexual
6001031
13
SECRET
---
## Page 102
14-00000
(
agents of NOSENKO, became acquainted. Work against
the United States Exhibition was the responsibility of
the Ninth Department, SCD, but various Departments
were participating under the direction of the Ninth
Department.
One of the above homosexual agents succeeded in
involving BARRETT in homosexual activities which were
photographed by the KGB but, according to NOSENKO,
although the photographs were of a good quality, the KGB
was
unable to
use the photographs in 1959 because of a
general ban by the Central Committee on the recruitment
of the United States Exhibition guides due to the planned
visit of President EISENHOWER to the Soviet Union.
NOSENKO also stated that the compromising material
and information on BARRETT was later given to the First
Department and that BARRETT was recruited by the Second
Section, First Department when he returned with another
Exhibition in 1961, and that he, NOSENKO, was not involved in
the recruitment operation, BARREIT, following his return
0001092
14
SECRET
---
## Page 103
SECRET.
to the United States in January 1962, confessed to the
FBI that he had been recruited in 1961 on the basis of
compromising photographs which had been taken
during his 1959 trip to Moscow.
Although it cannot be established at this
time, it is possible that the information furnished
by GOLITSYN which he had received from GRYAZNOV
actually refers to the Robert BARRETT case. It should
be noted that Robert BARRETT) could not actually be
characterized as an "American employee of the Embassy
in Moscow. "
(d) Page 162 of the previous summary contains infor-
mation from GOLITSYN that in the spring of 1960 when he
visited the First Section, First Department, SCD, he learned
from GRYAZNOV that GRYAZNOV had as an agent an Embassy
code clerk who was scheduled to be transferred to Helsinki.
GRYAZNOV indicated to GOLITSYN that the code clerk had
already furnished the KGB with some information, that he was
15
0001093
SECRET
---
## Page 104
SECRET
considered by the KGB to be a "real"' agent and that if
the transfer of the code clerk materialized, GOLITSYN
might have the code clerk as an agent in Helsinki.
NOSENKO has furnished no information which can be
correlated in any way with the above information from
GOLITSYN, but neither has the information from GOLITSYN
resulted in an identification despite the considerable investigation
which has been conducted in the matter. Although this is
considered to be a valid lead, it need not necessarily refer
to a code clerk who was in the United States Embassy in
Moscow during 1960 - 1961. It is also possible that the previous
remark by GOLITSYN concerning the above "code clerk" who
might be transferred to Helsinki as well as his cited remarke
in a-c could be clarified or at least additional information
obtained if a specific reinterview on these matters was possible.
The trip of Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki, Finland in
November 1960 should be mentioned in any comparison of information
from NOSENKO with information from GOLITSYN. This conflict is
001CS4
SECRET
---
## Page 105
SECRET
also mentioned in another section pertaining to the 1960-1961 career
of NOSENKO. GOLITSYN stated that KOSOLAPOV came to Helsinki
to accompany an American Embassy code clerk on the train to
Moscow and that KOSOLAPOV planned to strike up an acquaintance
with the code clerk which could be continued in Moscow.
The American Embassy code clerk referred to above was
undoubtedly (John GARLAND and the train manifest lists John GARLAND
and Viktor KOLOSOV (Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV) as passengers on the
same train from Helsinki to Moscow. NOSENKO is aware of the
identity of John GARLAND but claims no knowledge of the above trip
Of KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki, although being well aware of a previous trip.
NOSENKO, as Deputy Chief of the First Section specifically
charged with work against code clerks, should have been aware of the
November 1960 trip of KOSOLAPOV to and from Helsinki. His lack of
knowledge may or may not be explainable in terms of his other activities.
such as his trip to Cuba in November-December 1960 but it cannot be
interpreted as evidence NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB since, if
he had been, the KGB should have briefed NOSENKO on the trip of
KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki in November 1960, as this was an event the
KGB knew GOLITSYN was aware of.
6001095
17
SEPPET
---
## Page 106
A theory which bas previously been given consideration and
warranted full consideration was that if NOSENKO was dispatched,
his mission was to confuse leads furnished to American Intelligence
and/or to denigrate the value of information furnished by GOLITSYN.
In connection with this theory, it should be noted that NOSENKO during
current interviews has not made any remarks which could in any way
be construed as derogatory to GOLITSYN. In addition, NOSENKO does
not claim to have any detailed knowledge of the FCD and frequently,
when some topic peculiar to the FCD has been broached with NOSENKO,
his immediate reply has been to the effect that "I didn't work in the FCD, "
or "You should ask GOLITSYN about that. "
In connection with any consideration of whether the contact of
NOSENKO with CIA in Geneva in June 1962 could have been initiated by
the KGB as a result of the defection of GOLITSYN, the timing of certain
events should be noted. GOLITSYN defected on 15 December 1961.
NOSENKO departed from Moscow in March 1962 for Geneva, Switzerland,
where he remained until 15 June 1962.
It is felt that it would have been practically impossible if not
impossible for KGB officials to complete an assessment of the actual or
potential damage which could result from the defection of GOLITSYN,
18
6001096
---
## Page 107
SECREI
select NOSENKO as the individual who would be dispatched to counter
act the possible damage, and appropriately brief NOSENKO prior to
his departure for Geneva in March 1962. Therefore, if NOSENKO
was dispatched by the KGB, it would appear that plans for this would
have predated the defection of GOLITSYN and that any GOLITSYN
aspect could only be a related aspect and not the basis for the original
plan to dispatch NOSENKO. In addition, if NOSENKO was dispatched,
it would hardly seem necessary for the KGB to send NOSENKO to
Geneva two and one-half months before his first contact with CIA.
The theory has also been considered that NOSENKO could have
been dispatched to confuse and divert American Intelligence and thus
to protect an important KGB penetration or penetrations of the United
States Government, particularly CIA. This is a theory which should
and has been given full consideration, but it is not possible to factually
substantiate of refute this theory in the absence of specific information
that high-level KGB penetrations do or do not exist.
Actually, as regards NOSENKO, the primary area which should
be given consideration in the above matter is if all the information from
NOSENKO is accepted, what effect would or could it have on the efforts
19
SECRET
0001997
---
## Page 108
14-00000
(
SECRET
of American counter-intelligence tó determine the identity of and
take appropriate action against KGB penetrations of the United
States Government. The only answer to this question seems to be
that there would be little consolation or assurance to American intelli-
gence even if every statement by NOSENKO was accepted at face value.
The only specific area in which NOSENKO could be even con-
sidered to claim full knowledge is the United States Embassy in Moscow.
In this area his statements could be construed as assurance that there
were no recruitments of American personnel in the, United States Embassy
in Moscow from 1953-December 1963 with the exception of "ANDREY"
(Dayle Wallis SMITH) and Herbert HOWARD. The basis for this
expressed opinion of NOSENKO is considered elsewhere in this summary
and analysts may differ as to whether a recruitment could have occurred
of which NOSENKO did not have knowledge, assuming that his statements
are made in good faith. It should be noted, however, that at this time
there is no specific information which is in direct conflict with the
expressed opinion of NOSENKO.
NOSENKO, as previously mentioned, has never claimed any
particular knowledge of FCD activities, In addition, he does not claim
to be aware of all recruitments of Americans by the SCD. As an •
20
6001C98
- 1980099
---
## Page 109
SECRET
example, be has made it clear that his knowledge of SCD activities
against members of delegations, foreign businessmen, foreign students,
and individuals in the USSR on the invitation of a Soviet organization or
a component of the Soviet Government is extremely limited and at best
mainly of a collateral nature.
NOSENKO does not even claim any detailed knowledge of
activities of the Second Section (Active Line) of the First Department, SCD,
nor does he claim to know all of the cases of which the Chief of the Seventh
Department was aware. The latter is specifically supported by certain
notes brought out by NOSENKO which are short references to a number
of Seventh Department cases which are identified only by the KGB code
name. These notes, according to NOSENKO, were made when he had an
opportunity to review a notebook held by the Chief of the Seventh Department
and constitute the only knowledge NOSENKO had of these particular cases.
6001099
21
SECRET
---
## Page 110
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 111
14-00000
SECRET
G. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF A POLITICAL OR ANY
OTHER TYPE OBJECTIVE WHICH COULD JUSTIFY A DISPATCH
OF NOSENKO BY THE KCB WITH PERMISSION TO SPEAK
FREELY TO CIA CONCERNING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE KGB
AND WITHOUT NOSENKO BEING GIVEN A SPECIFIC
MISSION OR NESSIONS?
0001100
SECRET
CROM 1
downgrading and
declassifisation
---
## Page 112
SE6.21
G. Is there evidence of a political or any other type objactive
waich could justify a dispatch of NOSENKO by the KGB wick permission
to speak freely to CIA concerning his knowledge of the KGB and without
NOSENKO being given a specific mission or missions? The above possi-
bility has been given consideration even though the ultimate ramifications
are practically incalculable. The conclusion is that as regards NOSENKO,
with the single exception detailed below, there is no evidence of a
political or other type objective which could be considered of sufficient
importance by the KGB to warrant the dispaich oi a KGB offices with
the knowledge of NOSENKO to speak freely with CIA without his being
given a specific mission or missions by the KGB.
It is accepted that the Soviet leadership would be entirely capable
of instructing the KGB to dispatch a staff officer for permanent defection
to United States authorities with no specific intelligence mission and no
limitations on the KGB intelligence information he miga reveal providing .
that such act would, in the estimate of the leadersaip, result in a net
political gain for the USSR.
For such a possibility to be seriously
entertained by the Soviets, however, it wouid have to involve an issua of
majoi importance to the Soviet leatership and presumably would save to
0001101
EGRET
---
## Page 113
be considered by them as the only or at least the best means of
achieving we desired end and of having i very hige probability
of success.
The only area touched upon in any way by NOSENKO which
might meet the above requirements is the assassination of President
Kennedy: the involvement of Lee Harvey Oswald in the assassination
and his association with the Soviet Union. 'Given (a) speculation
obtaining at the time that there was Soviet involvement in the
assassination, (b) tbe premise that in fact there was'no Soviet
involvement, and (c) a hypothesis that the Soviet leadership was deeply
concerned lest erroneous conclusions be drawn which could lead to
irreversable actions, it is conceivable that the Soviet leadership migat
have been prepared to take extreme steps to convince United States
authorities of their non-involvement in the assassination. (The passage
so the United States Government of the aliegedly complete Soviet consuia:
file on OSWALD was, in itself, an unprecedented aci.)
The NOSENKO case warrants examination in the above regaid in
light of the fact that among the information NOSENKO provided was
"inside" KGB information on OSWALD: infornation waich purpoiiedy
00011C2
2
---
## Page 114
revealed the substance of the content of tae KGB files on OSWALD.
This information clearly indicated tha: there was no KGB relationship
with OSWALD, that the KGB had no operational interest in OSWALD,
and that as a matter of fact OSWALD had presented the KGB with a
continuing series of problems.
Upon examination, however, NOSENKO does not meet the
requirements premised above for serious Soviet consideration of a free
KGB defection.
The following reasons render this unacceptable:
a. The chronology, in itself, presents virtually impossible
problems for such a theses, viz. NOSENKO's initial approach to CIA
in June 1962, 17 months prior to the assassination of President Kernedy.
b. While the information from NOSENKO on OSWALD is
interesting and pertinent, it is not,
in nature, scope, and content,
sufficiently convincing for United States authorities to reasonably be
expected to conclude that it zepresented unequivocal proof oi Soviet
nor-involvement.
c. It is implausible not to assume that the Sovicts would
assume that United States authorities, in any examination of the
possibility of a Soviet (KGB) hand in the assassination, wouid presume
3
0001103
---
## Page 115
extrernely narrow Soviet compartmentation in such an operation -- a
compartmentation which would exclude knowledgeability by any KGB
officer other than very senior persons and an individual os group of
action individuals specifically concerned with matters of this nature.
The KGB career of NOSENKO would not permit even serious
consideration that NOSENKO could have logically been fitted into the
above very limited category.
It is accordingly concluded that the possibility of a politically
motivated free dispatch can in the case of NOSENKO be satisfactorily
eliminated.
The possibility has also been considered that the KGB might
have theorized that by dispatching an agent, in this case an officer,
with numerous leads to non-valuable or non-curient KGB agents or
cases, the facilities of the United States Intelligence community would
be practically neutralized for an extended period of time. This could
only be based on an assumption that the United States Intelligence
community would involve a major portion of its personnel and efforts
in the investigation and resolution of cases which had little or no curzent
or potential value to the KGB. The above possibility cannot be
arbitrarily eliminatod without full consideration. It is nos believed that
0001104
---
## Page 116
SECR
NOSENKO in the absence of any evidence that he had any KGB mission
oi missions to fulfill comes within the above category, particularly since ân
overall assessment of his information leads to the conclusion that full
exploitation of his information would be quite damaging to the KGB.
Consideration of the above possibility must also include an
evaluation of the deterrent effect on the prospects of future recruitments
by the KGB caused by legal action taken against individuals exposed by
information from the dispatched agent or officer. The deterrent offect
on others of the conviction and sentercing of persons who have committed
a crime or: crimes has long been a part of the legal theory of way persons
who commit a crime should be imprisoned or punished.
The deterrent effect on others of the trials and convictions of
William VASSALL, Robert Lee JOHNSON and James Allen MINTKEN-
BAUGH should not be underestimated. The KGB also could not have
inown that information furnished by NOSENKO would not result in the
trial and conviction of other KGB agents or recruitments concerning
whom NOSENKO had some knowledge.
5
0001105
---
## Page 117
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 118
SECRET
H. IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE THAT THE CONTACTS OF
NOSENKO IN 1962 OR IN 1964 WITH CIA WERE KNOWN TO THE
KGB PRIOR TO HIS DEFECTION OR THAT NOSENKO
WAS EVER BRIEFED BY THE KGB RELATIVE TO HIS BEHAVIOR
OR KGB OBJECTIVES DURING THESE CONTACTS OR
AFTER HIS DEFECTION?
0001106
SECRET
Excluded from automatic
dowagrading and
desiasal icallan
---
## Page 119
SECRET
H. Is there any evidence that the contacts of NOSENKO in 1962
or in 1964 with CIA were known to the KGB prior to his defection or
that NOSENKO was ever briefed by the KGB relative to his behavior
or KGB objectives during these contacts or after his defection? The
conclusion is that there is no evidence that the contacts of NOSENKO
in 1962 or in 1964 with GIA were known to the KGB prior to his
defection and that NOSENKO was never briefed in any manner by the KGB.
The basis for the above conclusion is substantially contained in
previous sections. It is being treated here as a separate area of interest
since it is a sufficiently important area as to warrant individual consideration.
It is recognized that since positive factual confirmation such as
the KGB file on NOSENKO is not available, any conclusion concerning
whether NOSENKO was or was not dispatched by the KGB can only be
based on the full review of available information from NOSENKO,
collateral sources, independent investigation and the opinion of the
individual analyst concerning the significance or non-significance of
each item of available information.
The conclusion that the contacts of NOSENKO with CIA in 1962
and 1964 prior to his defection were not known to the KGB is
0001107
SECRET
Excited dron automalle
dannarading and
1:3.31.1049
---
## Page 120
SECREA
necessarily based in part on a judgment as to whether any of his
activities or information logically warrant a substantial suspicion
that they were or could be in any part the result of KGB direction
or control. One of the particular areas considered was his apparent
behavior during his contacts with CIA in June 1962 and the conclusion
was that it was incomprehensible that he could have been under KGB
control at that time.
Consideration has been given to the possibility that his 1962
contacts with CIA were not known to the KGB, but became known to
the KGB later and NOSENKO was doubled by the KGB. It was con-
cluded that there was no basis for or information which would warrant
serious consideration of the above possibility aside from the separate
conclusion that the KGB would be very unlikely to reward a traitor in
KGB eyes by sending him again to Geneva where he would be quite free
to defect.
Worthy of comment in this section is the fact that NOSENKO,
during his 1962 contacts, expressed considerable concern over his
personal security, requesting that knowledge concerning his identity be
kept to an absolute minimum, that no communications be sent to the
2
0001108
SECRET
---
## Page 121
14-00000
S=6.27
Varied States Embassy in Voscow cuncerning lis contact wit. CIA and
that he did not wish io be contacted and wouid not recognize any attempted
contact within the Soviet Union. NOSENKO also furnished information as
to tse reason for his concein thai no information regarcing his contact
with CiA become known in the United States Embassy in Moscow and the
dangers to NOSENKO in any contact o, attempted contact with NOSENKO
in the USSR.
It is recognized that the above indicated concern of NOSENKO
about his personal security is noi substantial evidence thai NOSENKO
was not under KGB control; however, it is evidence that NOSENKO was
not in any way encouraging clandestine contact of NOSENKO within the
USSR, which very likely would have been an aim of the KGB if NOSENKO
was under KGB control.
The material which NOSENKO furnished to CIA in 1964 has been
carefuily reviewed to determine if there is any evidence that the KGB
participated in any way in the assembling of this rather unique collection
oi material. None of the material appeais to have been of an accountable
type and, on the contrary, it appears thai NOSENKO could hava furnissed
all of the material to CIA and returned to the Soviet Urion without the KGB
ever at a later date becoming aware that the material was actually missing.
The latter statement even inciudes the travel dogument Which audorized
the trip o NOSENKO to Gorkiy in December 1963.
00011C9
3
---
## Page 122
The tip in December 1963, according to NOSENKO, was to
participate in the search for Aleksandr CHEREPANOV. According to
NOSENKO, this particuiar documeni was not accountable in that it was
only necessary to turn it in when requesting reimbursement for travel
expenses.
NOSENKO stated tat e had not claimed te rather small
amount of money to waico he was entitled and has also admitted that he
really brought the document along because it gave him the indicated rank
of Lieutenan: Colonel.
NOSENKO has completely retracted his claim io baving had the
rank of Lieutenant Coionel, stating that ever as a Deputy Chief of Dapasi
ment be was only a Captain althoug, he was entitled to and expected to
receive the rank of Major in early 1964. NOSENKO bas stated that
giving him the rank of Lieutenant Colonel in the above document was
the error Of KASHPEROV, the officer on duty in the SCD on Sunday, and.
that practically all Deputy Chiefs of Department in the SCD had at least
the rank of Lieutenant Colonel.
The above explanation by NOSENKO may well be considered by
readers with at least a degree of skepticisma. However, if NOSENKO
was dispatched by the KGB, it would seem that he could have been pro-
viced with something a little move substantial to document his claim oi
the rank of Lieutenant Colonei, In addition, it would seem that the KCB
0001110
SECRET
---
## Page 123
14-00000
SEUNEi
could have provided NOSENKO with some type of document waice
would support at least one of his claimed positions in the SCD, KGB.
Even the Cherepanov Papers do not in any way support the claim oi
NOSENKO that be was Deputy Caies of the First Section, First
Depariment, SCD, in 1960 - 1961, nor do they even support the claim
of NOSENKO that there was such à position in the First Section in
1960 - 1961 0r even in 1958 or 1959.
0001111
5
---
## Page 124
IV
---
## Page 125
14-00000
SECRET
IV.
COMMENTS CONCERNING PREVIOUS CONCLUSIONS
IN REGARD TO NOSENKO
0001112
SECRET
Excluded trai
298233
---
## Page 126
SECRET
COMMENTS CONCERNING PREVIOUS CONCLUSIONS
IN REGARD TO NOSENKO
Attached is a verbatim copy of pages 357 - 360 of the "Examina-
tion of the Bona Fides of a KGB Defector"' which contains seven (A - G)
primary conclusions concerning the claimed Naval RU (Navy Intelligence)
and KGB career of NOSENKO.
These conclusions or findings are
independently treated in separate attachments.
With the exception of "G," the conclusions in this summary are
in direct conflict with the above conclusions and are basically that
NOSENKO served in the Naval RU from March 1951 to early 1953, was
a KGB officer from March 1953 until his defection in February 1964,
and held his claimed positions in the *KGB during the March 1953 -
February 1964 period.
* For purposes of clarity, the term KGB is used to refer to the
Committee for State Security and predecessor organizations
unless otherwise indicated.
Aïtachment:
Cpy Pgs 357-360 of "Examination
of the Bona Fides of a KGB Defector"
SFCRFT
CROST
congrading anu
dadlassiticalion
0001113
---
## Page 127
SECRET
PREVIOUS CONCLUSIONS RE NOSENKO
AS CONTAINED ON PAGES 357 - 360 OF
"THE EXAMINATION OF THE BONA FIDES OF A KGB DEFECTOR"
The following is a quote of the previous conclusions in the case of Yuriy
Ivanovich NOSENKO. (The specific conclusions have been given the designation
of A - G for purposes of easier correlation with other sections of this summary.)
"SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
CONCERNING NOSENKO'S BONA FIDES"
"NOSENKO claims that he served for a decade in the KGB in
successively senior positions of auhority from which he derived
extensive knowledge of the scope, character, and results of KGB
operations against Americans in the Soviet Union in the period
1953-1963. To substantiate his claim, he provides an impressive
array of information about KGB personnel, organization and opera-
tions which, to the extent that it has been confirmed, is presumptive
evidence of his bona fides. Various Soviet officials, including
intelligence officers, have generally corroborated NOSENKO's
claims.
According to some of these sources, NOSENKO was a
senior KGB officer who occupied a
series of sensitive positions, who
0001114
# :117797
---
## Page 128
SECKLi
enjoyed considerable authority and trust despite personal short.
comings, and whose defection, 'the greatest loss ever suffered
by Soviet Intelligence', paralyzed the work of at KGB
• Legal Residency, and justified the formulation of plans to assas-.
sinate him."
"The examination has compared each element of NOSENKO'e
biography relevant to his claimed KGB service with known
facts and reasonable surmise. The examination reflects the
test to which his accounts were put: whether his accounts are
internally coherent and consistent with known fact, and whether
he actually gained the information he has from occupying the
KGB positions he claims to have held. In short, is he what he
says he is, according to his own accounts?"
"This examination had led to the following findings, arrived
at independently:
A. NOSENKO did not serve in the Naval RU
in any of the capacities or at the places and times he
claimed.
B. NOSENKO did not enter the KGB in the
manner or ai the time he claimed.
C. NOSENKO did not serve in the American
Embassy Section throughout the 1953-1955 period as
he claimed.
6001115
---
## Page 129
Lite bad i o ones to
D. During the period 1955-1960, he was neither
a senior case officer in, nor Deputy Chief of, the Seventh
Department American-British Commonwealth Section.
E. NOSENKO was neither Deputy Chief of the
American Embassy Section nor a senior officer or
supervisor in the Section during the period 1961-1962.. (sic)
F. NOSENKO's claims, that in 1962 he was Chief
of the American-British Commonwealth Section and was
thereafter a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department, are
not credible.
G. NOSENKO has no valid claim to certainty
that the KGB recruited no American Embassy personnel
between 1953 and his defection in 1964.
These findings differ somewhat with respect to degree of probability.
or certitude, but they reflect the preponderance of available evidence
in each instance. "
"The above judgments, if correct, rebut presumptive evidence
of NOSENKO's bona fides. The contradictions in NOSENKO's accounts
of his life and KGB service are so extensive as to make his claims
as a whole unacceptable.. While truth and fact in this case frequently
0001116
SECRET
---
## Page 130
cannot be established with certainty, it is evident that truth and
fact are not what NOSENKO relates. By almost any test, virtually
any of NOSENKO's above claims are impugned by fact or probability,
or contradicted or retracted in his own statements. NOSENKO is
not what he claims to be, and thus he is not a bona fide defector."
"Given the conclusion that NOSENKO is not a bona fide
defector, it is necessary to attempt to determine his true motives
for contacting American Intelligence and for providing the information
he has given. Here, it must be recognized that the evidence, largely
consisting of NOSENKO's own assertions, does not permit unequivocal
conclusions.
Nevertless, the question cannot be ignored.: The
character of the information NOSENKO has conveyed, the fact that
some of his false claims have been corroborated by Soviet officials,
and the necessity to make decisions about NOSENKO's future all
require that at least a provisional judgment be made. "
"Of the reasonable explanations advanced for NOSENKO's
misrepresentations, the chief ones are that he is a swindler posing
as a former KGB officer for reasons of personal advantage; that he
suffers irom a deranged personality or unbalanced mind; that he has
greatly exaggerated his actual rank, status and access in the KGB, for
simply personal reasons; or, finally, that he is a dispatched KGB
agent. "
0001117
---
## Page 131
SEÜNEI
"The first two possibilities are easily dismissed. That
NOSENKO is not simply a swindler who falsely claims for personal
advantage to have been a KGB officer is evident, we believe, from
the confirmed details of KGB organization, personnel and operations
which he has provided and which could only derive from within the
KGB itself. "
"Second, as noted in the text, extensive psychiatric and
psychological examination by qualified specialists rule out the
possibility that NOSENKO's actions and testimony are the product
of a deranged personality or unbalanced mind."
"It is somewhat more plausible that NOSENKO is a KGB
officer who served in at least some of the components for some
or all of the time periods that he claims, but who greatly exag-
gerated his positions, rank and access to intormation, and
invented some matters outright, to achieve greater status with
American Intelligence.
This explanation, however, fails to
accommodate the fact that several KGB officers have asserted
that NOSENKO did in fact hold senior positions in the KGB. Also,
NOSENKO's assertions with respect to his rank, GRIBANOV's
patronage, the recall telegram, and the like, cannot be just a
product of his own invention, since these were the subject of
comment by other sources."
.""..":
6001118
PLODET
---
## Page 132
SECRET
"Because none of the above explanations is consistent with
the data developed in interrogations and investigations, we are
left with the hypothesis that NOSENKO was dispatched by the
KGB. While this explanation does not reconcile all the anomalies,
none of them renders it untenable. "
"In the absence of further revelations by NOSENKO, or
other persuasive evidence to the contrary, CIA finds that the
evidence establishes a presumption that NOSENKO was dispatched
by the KGB, and believes that prudence requires that he be
regarded as still responsive to KGB control, and that his infor-
mation should be assessed accordingly. "
6001119
CECRET
---
## Page 133
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 134
14-00000
SECRET
NOSENKO DID NOT SERVE IN THE NAVAL RU
IN ANY OF THE CAPACITIES OR AT THE PLACES AND
TIMES HE CLAIMED
SECRET
CAGUP 1
Excludes from automatich
degrading and
declassifier lan
0001120
---
## Page 135
SECRET
A. NOSENKO did not serve in the Naval RU in any of the capacities
or at the places and times he claimed.
(Previous conclusion)
The above is conclusion "A" in the previous summary in regard
to NOSENKO. The current conclusion is that the claimed service of
NOSENKO in Navy Intelligence (Naval RU) during March 1951 to early
1953 in the Far East and the Baltic areas is adequately substantiated
and should be accepted.
The interrogations of NOSENKO prior to 1967 were complicated
by NOSENKO changing the date of his graduation from the Institute of
International Relations from 1950 to 1949 because he did not wish to
admit that he had failed to graduate in 1949 with the majority of his class.
However, previous efforts of NOSENKO to revert to his original 1962
statement that he graduated in 1950 were not accepted and an unwarranted
significance was given to the 1949 - early 1953 period of time.
It is considered that NOSENKO has adequately explained his
"stupid blunders" as they relate to the above and to certain other personal
matters and that his claimed service in Navy Intelligence from March
SECRET
GROUPT
downgrading and
0001121
---
## Page 136
(
SLUMLA.
1951 to early 1953 both in the Far East and the Baltic area is fully
acceptable. It is not considered necessary to comment concerning all
of the remarks in the previous summary regarding the claimed Naval
RU service of NOSENKO as reflected on pages 49-59 and remarks will,
for purposes of brevity, be limited in scope.
The statement is made in the previous summary that "The sole
Headquarters RU officer NOSENKO identified was the Personnel Chief,
Colonel KALOSHIN. He identified no ranking officers in either'the Baltic
or Far East Intelligence Staffs. Some 30 GRU officers he did identify,
by his own admission, NOSENKO knew not from his Naval RU service,
but through social acquaintance, later, in Moscow, or through his visits
to Geneva. ":
Attached is a copy of a handwritten memorandum voluntarily
prepared by NOSENKO in late 1967 containing the names of a number
of GRU personnel of whom he had some knowledge. The attached was
not prepared as the result of any inquiry concerning his claimed Naval
RU service, but was only a small part of the material prepared by
NOSENKO at this time. The entire material included remarks by
NOSENKO regarding approximately (875)KGB officers, (100) KGB agents,
35 GRU officers and 400 other Soviet nationals.
0001122
SECRET
---
## Page 137
shei
It is interesting to note that the attached list contains the names
of approximately 20 GRU officers whom NOSENKO relates to the early
1950's period. In addition, NOSENKO has, during current interviews
and in other memoranda, furnished the names of additional Navy Intelli
gence
personnel whom he knew in the 1951 - early 1953 period.
Page 52 of the above summary and other related pages question
whether NOSENKO ever served in the Baltic area with Naval Intelligence
and even question his geographical knowledge of the area. Attached is a
copy of a handwritten memorandum with certain diagrams prepared by
NOSENKO on 21 February 1968 concerning his assignment with Navy
Intelligence in the Far East and the Baltic area. The memorandum was
completed by NOSENKO without any reference material and a review of
his diagrams indicates they are quite accurate.
NOSENKO had previously stated that his service in the Baltic
area was at Sovetsk Primorskiy and during current interviews recalled
that the former name of the place, an almost deserted fishermen's
village, was Fishausen. The previous designation given by NOSENKO
for this place as having the mail address of Sovetsk Primorskiy had
caused the conclusion that his alleged place of assignment was non-
existent. A further check in the matter would have disclosed that the
place was not nonexistent, that it is currently known as Primorsk and
that the former German name of the fishing village was Fischhausen.
3
6001123
---
## Page 138
The previous summary also stated that despite his claimed
active commissioned service in the Navy, NOSENKO knew nothing of
Soviet Navy tradition, doctrines, or organization of procedures. It
should be noted that there is a considerable difference between being
a member of the Naval RU and being an actual member of the Soviet.
Navy. The situation could be compared to a career civilian employee
of the Office of Naval Intelligence and a line officer in the United States
Navy•
Attachments:
List of GRU Personnel as Prepared by NOSENKO
Diagrams and comments
as Prepared by NOSENKO
6001124
SECRET
---
## Page 139
sekrenew Leonid - till 1952 or 1s53 a deputy of chief t nacy
inteli gene, they a chinf of mary itlligeure, later he was a deputy of dief.
f gal (Sezor Such and Isashutiny, I heard be was a navy attache in the ust.
for Malarients
2. bespalor - amajor, code desk of the very intellizence of 7 ficet
in Sorest Marbow's region in 195T-1952
3. boydanooskiy a deputy of chief of the navy intellizenerof 7
Fleet (on agents) in 1951-1952.
4. Bulakh - an officer of the ravy intelligence print of intelligenc
of te 4 Fleet in Sovietsk, Kaliningrad's distriét in 1852.
5. Chikin - in 1350- a colonel, rooked in ti departuret of foreiza
ins of the ministry of defence.
6. hurril'skiy - a colonel, in 1850 cooked in the depastment of
forcign, afflins of the misistry of dofence.
7. Demohenko an offic if nary intelligence point of intelligence if 4Fbet
in Sovietsk, Kaliningrad's district.
8. Denisento - in 1962-1954 a military attache of soviet embassy in Bern.
. Bolishakoo Yuri - au officer f GRIl (colonel), was in the USA,
marks whor. cons of press-agency Newss."
lo. Bulgaria Ler 1, in 1950= world in gRU.
11. Soliyer - du fficer if jU i 1150f. (or Syerler)
12. Kaloshin - a colonel, in 1150-455 a chief of personnel department.
the navy intelligence
0001125
13. Kononyuk - in 1950 finished the institute of internatisual relations,
i. 1917 Inton in the house istellierree sud cant toerant in Borde draine
---
## Page 140
1. Kipalkiu - a generel, in 1$90 t nos aidepeity of chief the military
diplimetic aondesmy, Ne hes tire sous: Kepalkiu Sergey- finchid this acudteny
in 4950, oorks in gRH, woiked in Halg und in Fzause, his nöifena drughtör if
Mirishel Tinioshento - Olya Efinishil the istituti f fozeign treds); Kapalkirtie-
Tor
in 1s4os studed as a student in the USt, alsa woks in gRU.
- inn.
5: Kabalinor Vadimir - a major, a serion offices if the hay intellizsuce
3f 7 Fleet in 1950- 52.
46. Khaberoo - in 19r0-52 n dipuity of chif of nery radio ditachiment
f the nary intelligence of 7 Féeet
17. Khaytor S.S. =a depraty of chif (on information) of nary intelli -
*P 7 Fleet in 1550-52
18: Kon'kox - adepent f chif if hacy intellizeuse of 7 Flict in 1951-52
1s. Rozlorskig - in iss0= suofficer of depostucut f fozciga offairs of the
ministry of dofence.
20. Molchunor - au ifficer of gAU (in 1350-)
21. Orchhor Geuscadi - in 1951-52 uu admimistzatice ifficer of the waoy in -
Telligence if 7 Fliet
20. Pegodiu Boris - a chiof ff- the serziteriate of musy intellizeuce f 7 Fleet
in 1950-1952, tavas a japaneze länguage.
23. Kezantseo-- a coumander of iung inteCeizeuce point of the inteGlizeure
4 Fect in Sovetsk , kaliningrid's düstiot in 1152.
.24. Shalin - a geueral, in 1340 = noes a chief of the kitilitory diplizuatic de.-
dimy, later ses a chief of JR4.
WDIIZG
25. Shanestuiker dueil madruisl warks in YRUl: his fatter vara masslallsi
---
## Page 141
26 Mel'nikor Seryay - a chif of woy intilligence of 7 Ilet i 190-52.
27. Nasugaladze -ayeurl, a chief of navy ütilêiguce nt Blacki ses; 1950-52
28. sergeyes - an cnjiner-biacolivel, a senior sfices of the naty .
intelligence if7 Fleet in 1507-54 (carlier hi worked in Turkey).
11. Suslotick - in 1300-52 a crmmcrelce of sacyadio datadment of the
mary intelligeme if 7 Fteet.
30: Srishehunov - au ifficer ef JCU, coondied in the USA, hest yiues in thn
din , from sshere was recalled .
:31. Tisiein, - a zuna-aduizel, is E550-5e é depety diif f te nary iste -
Mipenne of the ministry of militzzy wary.
32. Vasilevskiy Yuri - works in IEU, son of a muestel of Utk
33. Voroukro Alsbert -un officer of lhe masy intelligeute f 7 Ilect in 1952
34. Torantser Micherl- a viec aliviznl, a fosuer chief f hacy inteligena (yasi,
mVgihe hactata dostorof tde fent wodes in post leniegaid,
ascamhives egritfetgas
35. Yershrr - an effüer ef persoucl of the hacy intelligonie f 7 Tert-
in 1950-52, Rreoos a chinize lasignaye.
0001127
SECRET
---
## Page 142
.vi-t
Te tô ef Mareh, ihs tas sigkind an orler allount ly e.
pocitment es oa interpritor of the mary üntellizence of 7 F8it
in Soviet herbar, Primorskiy district., ahere 1 hunss goer.
by i train and arrived in the plice if my agsicitucut inthe
end of March: (I rocut from tilaseeo to Khabarrost, sshere.
chauged on train to Komsosolsk-on-tmur ther crossed the
Syatis pm statin Pirul west tE Srie hn (totie
Bay banin
Pay Postorujes, u
meset Zhildirbait,
sity Soviet
heboe
feisland Sukkalis.
The intellizeuce of 7 Flect was loasitid in lay Costroays, herc.
oive also Pelitioal directory ef I Flecti, submarinis and distrigias basei.
ui hiadquartens of 7 Fleit was triten in settlcmnnt iteldozi
He conusandes in oief f 7 Flict,was aduizal Baykor trasd.,
chief of staff - rice-atmiral Fasatinro.
$001128
He chiif of ny intelizence of 7 Fleet was captain of leunh
Wie Enikor Sergen K., dis denitis- en iticin of 2 zack Goglascoskep
---
## Page 143
, giutis department), capitaco if 1zante Khaytio Someu S: (iformotion
dtipeitnet, copptaiaf teik Kaiike( naoy int llijent), colonat
Buzchenko (a commissar).
I I noas working in the infarmeition dliguertrcut: tfhaers Kabaline;
Efimo' were working in this degartacuit. Oller officers of the inteligans.
ocre lietananit-coluel Sergeysr, lintesuit berautior Albert, ugjir
Sishor, ca teins Orekhor, Rodisuor, Pogodhio, Besprulou and 3-4 mar
ofroers, here vere also siargesits aul privates.
In the end of April, 1752 I Pless in Maseors (stogping for 12
dlgs ins Khaharosk) for a liare.
chif clircetiry:
In fuse -fuly IsTe a persemat desartment of thitnauy intelli
jusse (a chif -coloual kaloshinn) was deciting a peestièn abouit-
tersfrano briarse of illuass. Mud t was appiineted ins the iri
intelligence prisit of naoy intelligsues of H Fleet in Sowistsk (lo-
catid bifere a peninsula ti Bültügsk-forsier Pillau), rohece I
errived in August, 1952.(Kaliuiugrud's district-fornic fuesin)
Soviet is a litle sity-viliaje, a fornee german village of fish
crisen, it seems had ai hamue. Fishhassen.
Sövritsk
Surüitsk - a denrlishied Citelitiwn, here lhiri
isteltigiaoe pruil aud '
otters niletary detackmeuits (fuiliing
baittalion)."
6001129
Baltigse
Bültüyst. uns n buse and hendguinters of 4 Fleet
---
## Page 144
The chief of my nary intellizou prist was arpitain of 2 wink Kyszantico.
Hue were fficers: Pinogrador, Bulakh, Denchenko and others wilt serged;
and privates.
bufore my errine (d degs) this wasy intellizuce point ans tansfe-
nd from eest gerainy in Smist. If in Jerummy the work of the
point was sonnested with agit's work, how thee was whather
tash - a preparation of agent of territion past in a ease of noser
(544 persous reak poet). - an alsolidly monkey bussness
In the end of December I took a lers zasining it will hay illuess,
his herring in mind a transference in unither plase
In mid of March, 45s I began to work in 2 chief diretery flys,
(fare 1102)
0001130
---
## Page 145
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 146
14-00000
SECRET
B. NOSENKO DID NOT ENTER THE KGB IN THE
MANNER OR AT THE TIME HE CLAIMED
SECRET
taungrading and
declaratara
6001131
---
## Page 147
SECRET
B. NOSENKO did not enter the KGB in the manner or at the time
claimed. (Previous conclusion)
The above is conclusion "B" in the previous summary in regard
to NOSENKO. The conclusion in this summary is that NOSENKO entered
the then Second Chief Directorate, MVD, in mid-March 1953 and that his
entry was not only facilitated by but due to the influence of General
Bogdan Zakharovich KOBULOV.
Previous statements by NOSENKO and changes relative to date of
entry into the KGB have been mentioned in another section of the summary
and will not be repeated here. His statements during current interviews
that he entered on duty in mid-March 1953 as a case officer in the First
Section, First Department, Second Chief Directorate, MVD, are con-
sidered adequately substantiated and should be accepted.
The conclusion of the previous summary (pages 61-74) that
NOSENKO did not enter the KGB in the manner or at the time claimed
was primarily based on conflicting statements by NOSENKO as to when
he entered the KGB (MVD). In 1962 NOSENKO said March 1953 and in
1965 NOSENKO again said March 1953, soon after the death of STALIN.
SECRET
0001132
CROUP 1
Excluded from automatic!
dorograding and
declassification
---
## Page 148
In 1964, NOSENKO had given two dates in 1952 as his time of entry into
the KGB in an effort not to admit that he had failed to graduate from the
Institute of International Relations in 1949.
The previous summary gave considerable weight to the statements
of NOSENKO indicating that he did not enter the KGB (MVD) under what
are considered normal KGB procedures. Proper allowances were not
given for position of the father of NOSENKO, the Minister of Shipbuilding,
and the influence of General KOBULOV. An analyst can either accept of
reject the statement of NOSENKO that he entered the KGB (MVD) through
the influence of General KOBULOV; but, if the statement is accepted, then
the failure of NOSENKO to be required to follow normal KGB procedures
should also be accepted. A Communist society or a Soviet Intelligence
organization is not and could not be immune to influence by a high official.
General KOBULOV as of mid-March 1953 was First Deputy to BERIYA,
the Minister of the then MVD.
The previous summary raises several points concerning the
eligibility of NOSENKO for the KGB (MVD). It points out on page 67
that otber than bis undistinguished period of service with the Naval RU,
he was no more eligible for a KGB appointment in 1953 than he was at
the time of his previous rejection in 1950. This statement is not contro-
vertible and is fully accepted with the qualification that in 1950 NOSENKO
0001133
2
SECRET
---
## Page 149
was not sponsored by any person of influence as was the case in 1953
with General KOBULOV who in mid-March 1953 was the First Deputy
to BERIYA.
The previous summary also states that according to KGB
defectors familiar with the standards in force at the time, no candidate
was accepted who had ever had tuberculosis. This is a flat statement
which it is doubtful any defector or series of defectors could fully
substantiate; namely, that it never happened. Until and unless it is
medically proven that NOSENKO did not have tuberculosis, it is accepted
that he did have tuberculosis in 1952 and was at a sanitarium . rest
place in Kubinka. It is also accepted that he was an officer in the KGB
after mid-March 1953. The influence of KOBULOV could undoubtedly
have permitted NOSENKO to enter the KGB even though he previously
had tuberculosis, but the flat statement that no candidate was accepted who
had ever had tuberculosis is not and cannot be sufficiently substantiated.
The previous summary contained a number of additional remarks
and conclusions intended to show that NOSENKO was not eligible for and
therefore could not have entered the KGB (MVD). Comments concerning
these will be brief since there is considered to be no adequate basis at
this time on which to contend that NOSENKO did not enter the KGB
(MVD) as an officer in mid-March 1953. A comment was made that
0001134
3
SECRET
---
## Page 150
NOSENKO did not take a physical examination in connection with his
processing for KGB entry, and that such a medical examination was
routine and mandatory part of the processing of a KGB candidate.
This statement makes no allowance for the influence of General
ROBULOV; but, in addition, does not consider the fact that the Naval
RU dossier on NOSENKO was available to the KGB (MVD).
The previous summary also failed to note that the MVD would
have had independent information in regard to NOSENKO since the MVD
would have conducted any necessary inquiry in connection with the entry
Of NOSENKO into the Naval RU. As of 1953, the MVD undoubtedly also
had a dossier on the father of NOSENKO since this was still the STALIN
era.
The summary also states that NOSENKO did not complete the
necessary lengthy Anketa before entry into the KGB (MVD) and did not
speak to any personnel officers or visit the personnel office.
It would
seem that the influence of General KOBULOV could have permitted the
elimination of most if not all of the necessity of complying with normal
procedures,
but NOSENKO has during interviews stated that he com-
pleted the Anketa while sitting at his desk after entry into the KGB (MVD).
Page 70 of the previous summary states that NOSENKO did not
know the designation of his own Directorate either at the time he allegedly
6001135
4
SECRET
---
## Page 151
SECRET
entered on duty or during his first year of KGB service. While
NOSENKO has claimed that the designation of his Directorate at the
time he entered the KGB (MVD) in mid-March 1953 was the Second
Chief Directorate and that it subsequently was redesignated the
First Chief Directorate, DERYABIN has stated this reversal of
designations occurred in March 1953.
STALIN died in early March 1953 and that same month the
MVD and the MGB were merged under the name MVD with BERIYA
as Minister. BERIYA held this position until his arrest in early June
1953. BERIYA was succeeded by KRUGLOV, who held office for less
than a year. Yuriy RASTVOROV was recently queried concerning the
date of the reversal of the designation of the FCD and SCD and places
it as the end of April or early May 1953. GOLITSYN has indicated that
the change occurred "soon after the advent of BERIYA as head of the
MVD in April 1953. " In the light of our inability to fix the effective date
of the reversal of the designations of the SCD and the FCD, it is
unreasonable to impugn NOSENKO on his statement as to the designation
of his Directorate at the time of his entry into the KGB (MVD).
There
is a disagreement between NOSENKO and others as to who
was
responsible for the reversal of designations of the FCD and the SCD.
NOSENKO is of the opinion that it occurred under KRUGLOV, which is
5
0001136
SECRET
---
## Page 152
in conflict with the statements of DERYABIN, RASTVOROV and
GOLITSYN, all of whom maintain that BERIYA was responsible for
the changes. As for the issue of who was responsible for the reversal
of designations, it would appear that NOSENKO is in error. However,
the fact that he was a new junior officer and that this was a period of
upheaval in the KGB (MVD) effectively eliminates any significance in
this issue.
NOSENKO is criticized in the previous summary for not knowing
the location of the Chief Directorate of the Militia or the history of the
KI (Committee of Information). NOSENKO has stated that he had no
contacts with either office during 1953-1955 and there is no adequate reason
to disbelieve this statement. He is not aware of when the KI ceased to
exist (1951 given in the summary, but other information indicates the KI
continued to exist in a nominal capacity until the mid-1950's), but care
should be used in stating what NOSENKO should know if he held a certain
position. Readers of this summary may wish to reflect on their own
memory concerning the location and their knowledge of Agency facilities at
any given period of time or when Agency components or related organizations
were organized or ceased to exist.
6
0001137
SECRET
---
## Page 153
The point has also been made that any career of NOSENKO
in the KGB should have ended or he should have at least encountered
difficulty when his benefactor General KOBULOV, together with the
brother of General KOBULOV, was arrested with the BERIYA group in
early June 1953. NOSENKO has during current interviews stated that he
encountered no difficulties but is aware that the KOBULOV connection
was discussed by an officer from the Personnel Directory with an
official of the First Department. Under other circumstances NOSENKO
would very possibly have encountered difficulty; but, it should be noted
that the father of NOSENKO retained his position, that NOSENKO only
met General KOBULOV through his father, and that NOSENKO has stated
that although his father knew General KOBULOV, his father could in no
way be considered a member of the BERIYA group.
Üu1138
SECRET
---
## Page 154
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 155
14-00000
SECRET
C. NOSENKO DID NOT SERVE IN THE AMERICAN EMBASSY
SECTION THROUGHOUT THE 1953 -1955 PERIOD
AS HE CLAIMED
0001139
SECRET
---
## Page 156
SEORE!
C. NOSENKO did not serve in the American Embassy Section
throughout the 1953 - 1955 period as he claimed. (Previous conclusion)
The above is conclusion "C" in the previous summary. The
conclusion in this summary is that NOSENKO was an officer of the First
Section (American Embassy Section), First Department, from mid-March
1953 to late May 1955 when he was transferred to the Seventh Department,
SCD.
This period of time has been covered in detail with NOSENKO
during current interviews. The conclusion is that NOSENKO was an
officer in the First Section but was not a very effective officer and that
both his work and behavior were decidedly influenced by the fact that he
was the son of the Minister of Shipbuilding. NOSENKO is reluctant to
admit that he was other than slightly lackadaisical in his work during
this period of time, but is not hesitant to admit that his personal be-
havior was
such as to cause him to be removed as Secretary to the
Komsomol unit in 1954 and to cause an unsatisfactory "characterization"
SECRET
Excludad frun automatich
duregrading and
Gediaositication
6001140
---
## Page 157
it in in in a
to be prepared in early 1955 which necessitated a decision as to whether
he would be fired from the KGB or transferred to some other component.
The influence of his family is quite apparent in the above since
his father was advised of his difficulties in 1954 by an official of the
KGB and his mother interceded on his behalf in 1955 with the Chief of
SCD. The result in 1955 was that NOSENKO was transferred to the
Seventh Department and not fired from the KGB.
The question has been raised as to how NOSENKO could remain
in the KGB when after 1954 he was not a member of the Komsomol and
was not eligible to become a candidate for the Communist Party. This
is a valid question but a plausible explanation is again the fact that he was
the son of the then Minister of Shipbuilding.
NOSENKO has stated during previous and current interviews that
following his entry into the KGB and until circa mid-1954 he was respon-
sible for work against American correspondents in Moscow. He has not
claimed that he had any successes and has stated that the work with news -
paper correspondents already recruited was being handled by other officers.
NOSENKO has explained that during this time he was a "new officer,"
indicating he could hardly have been expected to act as an experienced
officer.
His knowledge of correspondents in Moscow during this period
of time, together with his knowledge of other KGB officers and his
2
6001141
SECRET
---
## Page 158
information concerning his own agents is believed of sufficient weight
to accept the statement of NOSENKO that work against American cor -
respondents was his assignment from mid-March 1953 to mid-1954.
From circa mid-1954 until his transfer to the Seventh Depart-
ment in late May 1955, NOSENKO claims and has claimed he was an
officer of the First Section with the responsibility of work against the
Military Attaches (Army) at the United States Embassy in Moscow. It
is considered, based on his knowledge of the various Military Attache
personnel and other collateral information furnished by NOSENKO, that
NOSENKO was an officer of the First Section during the mid-1954 - late
May 1955 period of time, that his primary work was against members
of the Office of the Military Attache, but that the quality of his work
undoubtedly left much to be desired.
In circa mid-1954, NOSENKO was removed as Secretary of the
Komsomol unit and by early 1955 his performance was such that at least
certain officials in the First Department desired his removal from the
First Department, if not the KGB. Under these circumstances,
NOSENKO could be criticized as having been a very poor if not
undesirable KGB officer, but his knowledge of the First Section during
this period of time and his knowledge of the members of the Office of
3
SECRET
6001142
---
## Page 159
SECRET
the Military Attache supports the claim of NOSENKO that be was an
officer of the First Section with the indicated assignment as related
by him.
NOSENKO has stated that the work against the Military
Attaches was not primarily directed toward development of recruitment
possibilities, but was directed toward control of the Military Attaches
. on trips in order to prevent observation of sensitive areas, sensitive
sites or sensitive activities in the USSR. This attitude by the KGB
would appear to be completely plausible and NOSENKO noted as
exceptional in this regard the recruitment attempt against Captain Walter
MULE. NOSENKO explained this exception as retaliation for approaches
to Soviets in the United States in that period.
NOSENKO has been criticized because he did not know all the
details concerning the Military Attaches which it was considered he
should have known if he had the specific responsibility for work against
the Military Attaches during the indicated period of time. It is submitted
that this may be evidence of his failure to satisfactorily fulfill his
6001143
SECRET
---
## Page 160
assigned junctions, mi muires to ajiwance for the uncertair persoi
staius d NOSENIO Whose actua: inture in the KGB was in jeopardy
NOSENKO RaS prEVIously
indicated and still indicates à definite
lach of incwledge concerning his assigned targets during approximately
March - May 1955. This, according to NOSINKO, was when an ur-
satisfactory "characterization" was beirg prepared on NOSENKO, a
decision was being made on his case, and a period of time in waich he
veri on a "big druak" which culminated in his spending about 40 days
made: suspiral care because of the possibility of recurrence i his previous
miberculosis.
Pages 84 - 87 of the previous summary suggeat thai NOSENNO
had not fumished sificient details about his alleged agent detwo.. fur
we ajalast the Military Attaches. It is considered that NOCENC in
curreni incerviews has uinished adequae acceptable deta.s, zad as
an example iurnisaed spicific mormation concerning "VOLODiNA
ral JAkeli" pig- 85) "Wed appear that inere was 10 tai by
NOSadio i Withaoi information concaraing wese individuals, buc
0001144
5
---
## Page 161
The effectiveness or non-effectiveness of NOSENKO during his
assignment to the First Section, First Department, from mid-March
1953 to late May 1955 can have little pertinency in the question of the
bona fides of NOSENKO if it is accepted that he actually was an officer
in the First Section during this period of time. It is felt that information
furnished by NOSENKO in current interviews and in previous interviews
is of sufficient scope and detail that his claimed service as an officer
in the First Section during this period of time is completely acceptable.
0001145
6
SECRET
---
## Page 162
0001146
---
## Page 163
14-00000
SECRET
D. DURING THE PERIOD 1955 - 1960, HE WAS NEITHER A
SENIOR CASE OFFICER IN, NOR DEPUTY CHIEF OF,
THE SEVENTH DEPARTMENT AMERICAN-BRITISH
COMMONWEALTH SECTION
0001147
SECRET
CROUP 1
Excluca: ton cutomatic
diagrading and
racines Acation
---
## Page 164
•..
SECRET
D. During the period of 1955 - 1960, NOSENKO was neither a
senior case officer in, nor Deputy Chief of, the Seventh Department,
American-British Commonwealth Section. (Previous conclusion)
The above is conclusion "D" in the previous summary.
The
current conclusion is that NOSENKO was an officer in the Seventh
Department, SCD, from late May 1955 to December 1959 and was
Deputy Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section, Seventh
Department from 1958 to December 1959.
During current interviews, NOSENKO has furnished extensive
information concerning his own activities in the Seventh Department
during the 1955-1959 period. Interviews of persons who were the subject.
of KGB interest collaterally confirm that NOSENKO was personally in-
volved in certain claimed activities during 1955 to December 1959.
These
activities include among others the recruitment of Richard BURGI.
in June 1956, contact with Sir Allen LANE)and Arthur BIRSE) in the
summer
of 1957, the recruitment of (Gisella HARRIS) in 1958, the re-
cruitment of George DREW) in the spring of 1959, the recruitment of
0001148
SECRET
comparadian did
Ceconomitation
---
## Page 165
14-00000
SECRET
William Stanley WILBY) in June 1959, the recruitment of David TAYLOR
in the summer of 1959, the recruitment of Gerard MERTENS in July -
August 1959, and the recruitment of Arsene FRIPPEL in 1959. The
foregoing is not a complete list of all cases in which NOSENKO claims
personal involvement, but is representative of cases in which his alleged
participation has been confirmed by interviews with the individual who
was the KGB target.
Sir Allez LANE, Arthur BIRSE, William Stanley WILBY) and
David TAYLOR were British citizens and the other above-named indi-
viduals were United States citizens. This would seem to substantiate
the claim of NOSENKO that during 1955 - December 1959 he was an
officer engaged in KGB operations against American-British Common-
wealth tourists in the USSR.
In addition, NOSENKO has furnished specific information about
an operation against Martin MALIA, an American tourist who was in
the Soviet Union from approximately September 1955 to December 1955.
MALIA)has not been interviewed and will not be interviewed, so at this
time no particular 1955 case in which NOSENKO claims involvement
or personal knowledge has been substantiated by interview of the
individual involved.
0001149
2
---
## Page 166
NOSENKO has furnished information on the travel of certain
United States Government officials, including Congressional represent-
atives to the USSR in 1955 - 1956; and the trip of Supreme Court Justice
William O. DOUGLAS in 1955 which, when considered with the previously
mentioned specifics, adequately substantiate his claimed service in the
Seventh Department and work against American-British Commonwealth
tourists during the late May 1955 - December 1959 period.
NOSENKO has stressed that when he transferred to the Seventh
Department, the Tourist Section had just been established and an agent
network was not available for operations against American and British
tourists. This seems quite logical since the influx of tourists into the
USSR was just in, a formative stage.
NOSENKO has spoken in detail about an agent network he de-
veloped after 1955 which primarily consisted of Intourist personnel
and two homosexual agents, "SHMELEV" and "GRIGORIY" (KGB code
names), whose extensive use in KGB operations has been confirmed by
interviews with individuals who were the subject of homosexual com-
promise operations.
The previous summary contained remarks on pages 101 - 150
in regard to the claimed 1955 - 1959 Seventh Department service of
0001150
NOSENKO. To comment on all the aspects mentioned in those fifty
3
---
## Page 167
SECRET
pages would be repetitious and in many instances superfluous. It is
considered that even if the statements were accepted in toto, there
would still not be an adequate basis for a conclusion that NOSENKO
was not an officer
in the claimed positions in the Seventh Department
during the period of late May 1955 - December 1959. Nor is it con-
ceded that, if all the sub-conclusions and the interpretationg of various
areas of information were accepted without qualification, there is any
evidence that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB.
However, there
are certain assumptions and interpretations which appeared in the
previous summary which are particularly worthy of comment and which
are considered erroneous or require additional clarification.
On page 145 it is stated that the evidence suggests that NOSENKO
was an English-speaking specialist in sexual entrapment, not a counter-
intelligence officer responsible for the identification of foreign agents
among tourists or for the development, recruitment, and exploitation
of agents for the KGB. The Second Chief Directorate, KGB, and the
MVD have used homosexual and heterosexual compromise in numerous
known (and presumably unknown) successful recruitments and recruit-
ment attempts. This activity has not been limited to the Seventh Depart-
ment, SCD; and the innuendo that NOSENKO was "only an English-
speaking specialist in sexual entrapment"' and not a KGB orderlthen
SECRET
---
## Page 168
14-00000
SECREI
considered with the detailed information NOSENKO has provided on
Seventh Department personnel, activities, procedures, and topics of
a similar nature is not considered to have any foundation in fact.
Page 145 of the above
summary lists eleven operations which
were Seventh Department cases prior to 1960 and which were included
in the notes furnished to CIA in 1964 by NOSENKO. The named operations
were those against Bernard PECHTER, Patrick PRESSMAN, John RUFE,
Gerald SEVERN, Sofia SHATIAUER, (fnu) KARLOV, Norman FISK,;
Ralph MATLAW, Marvin KANTOR, Michael GINSBURG, and William
(TARASKA. The criticism made in regard to the above eleven cases
was that NOSENKO could not describe the individual operations other
than to say that he had recorded the name of the target and such details
as he could acquire when he reviewed the activities of the Seventh Depart
ment in 1962 following his return from the First Department.
The notes brought out by NOSENKO are considered in another
section of this summary, but it should be noted here that a full review
of all of the notes of NOSENKO currently available indicates that his
statements as to how and why he obtained the information in the notes
are completely plausible. A detailed explanation of the notes furnished
by NOSENKO would almost necessitate a separate listing of the approxi-
mately 150 cases
or names mentioned in the notes.
0001152
5
SECRET
---
## Page 169
During current interviews, NOSENKO furnished specific
information on certain of the above eleven cases, including William'
(TARASKA, Bernard PECHTER, Michael GINSBURG and John RUFE,
It should also be noted that certain of the cases such as Marvin KANTOR
and William TARASKA were cases in which the tourist was visiting
relatives in the Soviet Union and that NOSENKO has given a satisfactory
explanation of how he learned of the KANTOR case. NOSENKO has, in
discussing his duties as Deputy Chief of the American-British 'Common-
wealth Section, also explained that if a tourist indicated that he intended
to visit relatives in the USSR, the case automatically was assigned to a
group of officers in the Section who reported directly to the Chief of
Section and were, not under the supervision of NOSENKO.
NOSENKO has stated that he noted the names of three of the
individuals when retiring the files of "GRIGORIY" and "SHMELEV, "
two homosexual agents of NOSENKO previously mentioned. NOSENKO
has explained that "SHMELEV" and "GRIGORIY" had the assignment of
identifying American travelers with homosexual tendencies, that they
had contact with numerous Americans, and that they had homosexual
activity with individuals on whom they reported but on whom no overt
action was taken by the Seventh Department.
In some cases the individual
6001153
6
SECRET
---
## Page 170
SECRET
was not considered a worthwhile target and in others the information
was just maintained for possible use at a later date if the individual
returned to the USSR.
NOSENKO has also explained how he learned of the Patrick:
PRESSMAN and Gerald SEVERN cases; and, the listing of the Sofia
SHATTAUER case in connection with the 1955 - 1959 period is in com-
plete error since page 427 of the previous summary contains information
from NOSENKO on her recruitment in 1962. During current interviews
the notes which NOSENKO brought out in 1964 have been discussed in
detail with NOSENKO. He has given a detailed explanation of the material
which he brought out and his explanation of all aspects is very convincing.
The previous summary (page 144) suggested that the involvement
of NOSENKO in certain cases being handled by other Sections in the
Seventh Department or by the KGB Directorate of Moscow was unusual.
An examination of the cited cases does not indicate that his participation
was unusual, but rather that his explanation of why he was involved is
logical and normal. No consideration was previously given to the English
language capability of NOSENKO or the fact that his own homosexual agents
were used in two of the four cited cases.
The summary also noted that there was a question concerning
whether Gisella HARRIS)was necessarily a Seventh Department case.
0001154
7
REPRET
---
## Page 171
14-00000
SECRET
(
• This question seems quite superfluous since HARRIS was in the USSR
on a tourist visa and "real" tourists are the responsibility of the Seventh
Department.
Departmental responsibility within the SCD for an indi-
vidual traveling in the USSR is decided on the basis of how the individual
is traveling; i. e., whether on a tourist visa,
as a member of a delegation,
as the invitee of an organization in the USSR, as a former diplomat
stationed in Moscow, as a diplomat not previously stationed in Moscow,
as a member of the Cultural Exchange program, as a student attending.
a university in the USSR, etc. There are also various other factors
which affect the determination of which Department or organizational
component of the SCD has the responsibility for a tourist case. These
factors include whether the individual is already suspected of foreign
intelligence connections and whether the individual is a businessman.
In addition, certain actual tourists in the USSR may never become the
responsibility of the SCD if the individual is of specific interest to the
FCD.
On pages 148 - 149, NOSENKO is criticized for not knowing at
least some of the substance of the information furnished by George
BLAKE in regard to the CIA-MI-6 program of utilizing tourist agents
in the USSR. This criticism completely ignored the fact that NOSENKO
made several references in 1962 to the KGB having such information
0001155
8
SECRET
---
## Page 172
SECRET
although he did then and still suspects that William VASSALI was the
source. The references by NOSENKO to the KGB having such infor -
mation were not developed in 1962 or later interrogations, and it was
not until current interviews that it was established that NOSENKO had
actually seen excerpts of information passed by George BLAKE.
According to NOSENKO, the information which was obviously only
partial was furnished to the FCD by the SCD and could only have come
from an agent.
The previous summary (page 149) also notes that in 1961 CIA
acquired a lengthy Top Secret study on the subject of the use of tourists
by American Intelligence for espionage and operational support in the
Soviet Union (document was furnished by GOLITSYN following his de-
fection in December 1961). It was noted that the summary contained
references to certain 1958 - 1959 tourists whom the KGB counter-
intelligence identified as American agents and noted that NOSENKO
claimed he was Deputy Chief of the American-British Commonwealth
Section in this period of time and that he claimed the KGB identified
no American Intelligence agents during this period of time. What later
is described as
a claim by NOSENKO is neither an accurate reflection
of what NOSENKO said prior to 1967 or has said since 1967.
0001156
9
SECRET
---
## Page 173
SECREA
NOSENKO has never claimed to know all activities against
American travelers in the Soviet Union during 1958 - 1959. Many
of these travelers would have been the responsibility of a section in
the Seventh Department, other than the American-British Common-
wealth Section, or another Department in the SCD. NOSENKO was
quite aware that certain of the American tourists in 1958 - 1959 were
acting suspiciously from a KGB point of view.
NOSENKO has stated he was aware that a document which the
Seventh Department had prepared and furnished to the ECD in an effort
to obtain further assistance from the FCD in the work against tourists
had been compromised by GOLITSYN. NOSENKO stated he was not in
the Seventh Department when the document was prepared and did not
review the document until after the defection of GOLITSYN and follow
ing advice from the FCD to the Seventh Department, SCD, that the
document had been compromised. The document furnished by GOLITSYN
has never been reviewed with NOSENKO to determine if it contained
additional information not in the document which he was aware had
been prepared by the Seventh Department for the ECD.
NOSENKO has been impugned on his apparent unfamiliarity with
a number of cases cited as examples in the document furnished by
GOLITSYN. In current interviews, however, the descriptioUt NOSENKO
10
SERRET
---
## Page 174
14-00000
concerning the distributon di resporsibilities wiin de SCD io.
Various
categories
O fORCiZA ViSORS tO tU USSR provides a logical
expiminion foi his mammit. Previous pioblems in is regard
a2306i
to have stemmed fion a misconceptica li tie meaning oi tae
term "tourist"' as üsed by the KC3. Tais gecerai term has a spacific
meaning in tre Second Guidi Directorate; namely, a "tourist"' is a
ioreigner travalling io the USSR on a tourist visa. Such a person
was the responsibuity oi the Iourist Section of lae Seventh Depazi-
mazi. A large number of tavelers to the USSri, inciuding bismess-
men, pessons travelling on invitation of a Sovict Organization,
students
attending a university, eic., ure qui tourisis in the KGS concept and
would not be ine responsibility of the Tourist Section of the Seventa
Départment.
The oy unresoived Frobiem considered di any sagnificance
¡a regara to the 1955 - 1959 pariod is ze account by NOSENKO of ica
prasence of American citizen Joan SHUSIN in tse USSR as a tourist
in the late 1950's. Tae previous summaly ported out that, sirce
cohn SauBldid not have a valid Juited States passport between 1940
anà June 1951, it was imjossible loi him io have been a tourist undei
true name in the USSR and, therefore, a taiget of the Seventa Depari-
mont, as NOSTikO cians. Alaougo saveral avenues oi possisty
0001158
Fruitil investigation have not yet been illy explored, there is to
11
20099
---
## Page 175
assurance that this anomaly will ever be explained. All tat
justifiably can be said ai the preser ime is that, even if the story
Oí NOSENKO is inaccurate, there is no evidential reason way such
inaccuracy should be interpreted as indicative of deception or dispatch,
or for that matter as indicative that he was not Deputy Chief of the
American-British Commonwealth Section of te Seventic Department
in 1958 - 1959; neither would such an inaccuracy reflect on his claimed
service in 1962 - 1963 in the Seventh Department.
G001159
12
---
## Page 176
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 177
14-00000
SECRET
E.. NOSENKO WAS NEITHER DEPUTY CHIEF OF THE AMERICAN
EMBASSY SECTION NOR A SENIOR OFFICER OR
SUPERVISOR IN THE SECTION DURING THE
PERIOD 1961 - 1962 (sic)
0001160
SECRET
GROUP 1
seven rains and
---
## Page 178
SECRET
E: NOSENKO was neithor Deputy Chief of the American
Embassy Section nor a senior officer or supervisor in the Section
during the period of 1961 - 1962 (sic). (Previous conclusion)
It is the conclusion of this summary that NOSENKO held the
position of Deputy Chief, First Section (American Embassy Section),
SCD, from January 1960 - December 1961.
The claim of NOSENKO that he held the above position in 1960
- 1961 has been the most difficult claimed position of NOSENKO to
satisfactorily resolve and accept. Acceptance or nonacceptance of
his claim to have held this particular position is a critical factor in
a decision as to whether the remainder of his claimed KGS career
is valid. It is believed reasonable to presume that if NOSENKO was
Deputy Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section, Sevenua
Department, prior to December 1959 in the absence of any indication
that he was demoted, he should have been ai least a Deputy Chief oi
Section during 1960 - 1961.
Position in the SCD, KG3, and throughout the KGB is important
from a monetary point of view as well as a prestige point of view. I
0001161
---
## Page 179
NOSENKO was only in the First Section as a Senior Case Officer, in
1960 - 1961, this would have been a demotion in position with resultant
loss of both money and prestige. Foi this reason alone, his failure to
have held the position of Deputy Caies in 1960 - 1961 would raise con-
siderable doubt as to whether he held his claimed position prior to 1960,
as well as whether he held his claimed positions in 1962 - 1963.
It is apparent that the knowledge of NOSENKO concerning all
aspects of activity in the First Section, First Department, during 1960 -
1961 is incomplete when judged by what are considered the normai
responsibilities of a Deputy Chiei in CIA. During current interviews,
an effort was made to determine what the responsibilities of NCS ENKO
actually were in 1960 - 1961 and whether his statements in this area
were impossible or could be accepted as noi negating his claim to have
been Deputy Chief, First Sectio.
According to NOSENKO, in the early 1960's there were only
approximately fifteen Deputy Chiefs of Section in the entire SCD and
in certain departments none of the sections had a Deputy Chief of Section.
in addition, transíer
of a Deputy Chief of Section was not always followed
by a repiacement in kind, according to NOSENKO who stated that he was
not replaced by another Deputy Chief when he transferred to the First
Section, First Department.
0001162
2
430201
---
## Page 180
According to NOSENKO, inere was not a job description for a
Deputy Chief o Section and te dusies of the particular Deputy Chief
were in actuality whai the Chie of Department and Crief of Section
decided would be his assigned duties.
The previous summary drew attention to an apparent conflict
between early statements of NOSENKO that he replaced no one when he
entered on duty in the First Section, First Department, and his subseguent
claim that he replaced Mikhail BAKEVALOV as Deputy Chief in the First
Section. Along with this he had first credited KOVSHUK and various
other officers in the Section with previous responsibility for cerain
matters which were assigned to him upon his arrival there, then later
stated that BAKHVALOV had been responsible for these matters. The
previous summary noted that interrogation had never resolved these
contradictions.
In the light of the present clearer picture of the nature of a
Deputy Chief of Section, the statements of NÖSENKO on BAKHVALOV
and on the issue of who he, NOSENKO, did or did not replace are not
contradictory. There is no reason to question that BAKHVALOV, with
whom NOSENKO, incidentally, did not overlay, was a Deputy Chiei of
Section in the First Section before NOSENKO, and thai he was respon-
sible for certain areas which latei iell to NOSENKO. On the oiner
0001163
3
---
## Page 181
hand, according to NOSENKO, the principal reason for his being assigned
to the First Section was to concentraie on a new area of emphasis (code
clerks). There could of course have been no specific predecessor for
a substantively new area. Therefore, in one sense BAKHVALOV was
the predecessor of NOSENKO and in another sense he was not. The
interpretation of the various statements of NOSINKO on this issue as
being in conflict appears to be the result of coniusion on this point by
all concerned.
According to NOSENKO, at the time of his transier to the First
Section, First Department, in early 1960, he had not been told and for
a short period thereafter was not told what his actual duties would be.
KOVSHUK, Chief of the First Section, wanted to assign NOSENKO to
supervise the work against Service Attaches at the United States Embassy.
NOSENKO felt that the proposed assignment by KOVSHUK was intended
to keep NOSENKO occupied with nonproductive work since KGB policy
for work against the Service Attaches was primarily one of control on
trips and not active work towards possible recruitment.
After a short period of time, NOSENKO was iniormed by
GRIBANOV that he, NOSENKO, had been transferred to supervise the
work agains: code cleris (also code machine mechanios) ai the United
States Embassy. GRIBANOV defined this work as being of the greatest
0001164
8272.
---
## Page 182
importance, and the recruitment of code clerks as a priority aim of
the KGB. KLYPIN, who was Chief of the First Department, later re-
peated the above and a group consisting of NOSENKO, Gennadiy I.
GRYAZNOV and Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV was formed with NOSENKO
responsible for supervision of the work. GRYAZNOV and KOSOLAPOV
were not new KGB officers, but instead were experienced officers
although both as Senior Case Officers were of lesser rank than NOSENKO.
NOSENKO does not claim that he had to train either officer or to minutely
scrutinize every action or proposed action of GRYAZNOV and KOSOLAPOV.
NOSENKO does claim he was responsible for supervision over their
work.
According to NOSENKO, GRIBANOV emphasized that work
against code clerks was to be his primary work in the First Section
and that it would take precedence over any other activity. Other than
work against code clerks, NOSENKO has generally defined his resyon-
sibilities as follows:
(a) Responsibility for file of (work against) John
ABIDIAN, Security Officer at United States
Embassy•
(b)
Responsibility for preliminary review of re-
poris irom OTU (KGB technical unit) of "take" from
microphones in the United States Embassy.
6001165
5
---
## Page 183
(c) Responsibility for maintenance of the physical
security file on the United States Embassy.
(d) Acting in place of Vladislav KOVSHUK, Chief,
First Section, when KOVSHUK was absent.
As can be seen from the above, the responsibilities of NOSENKO,
by his definition, which are borne out by specific information furnished
by NOSENKO, would not coincide with the normal responsibilities of a
Deputy Chief of Branch or Section in CIA. An analyst can either accept
or reject the theory that there is necessarily an equation between the
responsibilities of a Deputy Chief in CIA and the KGB, but il the analyst
accepts the theory, he must offer some supporting evidence on this point.
Pages 151 - 261 of the previous summary contained comments
and conclusions and sub-conclusions in regard to the claimed service.
of NOSENKO as Deputy Chief of Firsi Section, First Department, 1960 -
1961. The previous primary conclusion was that he was neither Deputy
Chief of the First (American Embassy) Section nor a supervisor in that
section. The conclusion of this summary is that he was Deputy Chief
and had supervisory responsibilities for work against code cierks. The
matter of the responsibility of NOSENKO for work against code clerks
will be considered later. Comments will first be made on the respon-
sibilities listed in (a) - (d) above.
0001166
6
9E0G27
---
## Page 184
SCUL
Pages 205 - 222 of the previous summary contain a detailed
basis for the previous conclusion that NOSENKO was not the KG3 case
officer for john ABIDIAN. The current conclusion is that he was the
responsible case officer for ABIDIAN. Whether or not his work against
ABIDIAN compared favorably with what is considered to be the MO of
a responsible CIA case officer is immaterial; what is material is
whether NOSENKO reasonably fulfilled the requirements of the KGB
for work against the particular target, John ABIDIAN. It is felt that
the answer to this is that NOSENKO did.
According to NOSENKO, the work against ABIDIAN was in the
direction of determining if ABIDIAN would lead the KGB to "another
POPOV, " and no consideration was given to active agent work against
ABIDIAN for possible recruitment. This explanation by NOSENKO
appears reasonable and logical and his knowledge of ABIDIAN and his
description of his work against ABIDIAN should be considered only
within that framework.
Admittedly NOSENKO was unaware of a considerable amount
of details regarding the background of ABIDIAN, but on the other hand
it the statements of NOSENKO are accepted that the only aim of the
KGB was to see if coverage of ABIDiAN would lead to "another POPOV, "
it follows that such personalia information on ABIDIAN would have had
0001167
7
---
## Page 185
little material value for the SCD. The FCD had advised the SCD prior
to the arrival of ABIDIAN in the USSR that ABIDIAN was considered to
be "American Intelligence, " and in addition ABIDIAN assumed the
Security Officer position formerly held by Russell A. LANCELLE,
who was known by the KGB to be CIA. No investigation by the SCD
was necessary to determine if ABIDIAN was "American Intelligence"
or not.
The previous summary, pages 213 - 216, contains som e quite
specific statements relative to ABIDIAN and a Soviet maid, a KGB
operational contact according to NOSENKO, which are erroneous.
This invalidates one of the bases for the previous conclusion that
NOSENKO was not the responsible case officer for ABIDIAN.
NOSENKO had previously stated that in circa October 1960 he
prepared an operational plan on ABIDIAN which included continuation
of the placing of Metka on the clothing and eifects of ABIDIAN by his
maid who is mentioned above, Tatyana FEDOROVICH. The statement
is made in the summary that this could not be true because FEDOROVICH
did not work part time for ABIDIAN until at least July 1961. ABIDIAN.
has recently been reinterviewed concerning the above and the results.
invalidate the previous conciusion that FEDOROVICH could nui have
treated the clothing and effecis of ABIDIAN with Metka prio: 10 July 196i.
C001168
8
---
## Page 186
ABIDIAN has now stated that he arrived in Moscow in March
1960 with the intention that he would not employ a Soviet maid. Approxi-
mately three months later his close association began with Myra
KEVIVER, a Department of State employee; this association continued
until she left Moscow in mid-1961. KEMMER had Tatyana FEDOROVICH
as a maid and through mutual agreement with KEMMER, FEDOROVICH
became the pari-time maid for ABIDIAN beginning sometime in the fall
of 1960. From that time on FEDOROVICH, according to ABIDIAN, had
uncontrolled access to his living quarters since she had a key to permit
entry for cleaning purposes.
ABIDIAN did not mail any operational letters within the Soviet
Union until after March 1961 and therefore in view of the above, there
is do reason to contradict the statement of NOSINO that the three mical ?
operational letters intercepted by the KGB and mailed by ABIDIAN all
showed evidence of Metka. It is interesting to note that NOSENKO in
June 1962 warned CIA about the KGB use of Metka for spotting internal
letter mailings by United States Embassy personnel.
ABIDIAN, according to NOSENKO, was the subject of a 24-hour
surveillance with the Seventh Directorate assigning a specific surveillance
brigade to cover ABIDIAN. The actual surveillance of ABIDIAN was the
responsibility of the Seventh Directorate which submitted reports to the
0001169
---
## Page 187
800051
First Section, First Department. NOSENKO, as the responsible case
officer for ABIDIAN, was expected io review these reports and give
any appropriate guidance or direction to the Seventh Directorate, but
under the KGB organization he would not participate in the surveillance
activities of the Seventh Directorate. NOSENKO stated that had sur-
veillance or agent information disclosed any personal weaknesses of
ABIDIAN, the KGB would have attempted to exploit them. No personal
weaknesses were disclosed, according to NOSENKO, and the pattern
of coverage to see if ABIDIAN would lead the KGB to "another POPOV!
remained unchanged.
Pages 210 - 212 of the previous summary notes that NOSENKO
was unaware of countries visited by. ABIDIAN during trips ouiside the
USSR and that no effort was made by NOSENKO through the FCD to find
out such information. According to the previous summary, NOSENKO
stated that the FCD "would not accept"' such a request for "operationai
action against an American diplomat coming from Moscow. " The
surveillance which would have been required on the part of the ECD
to achieve any sort of reasonable coverage of ABIDIAN abroad would
certainly have placed a severe burden on the FCD. Further, NOSENKO
contends that the results which might reasonably be expected would be
of little or no practical value to the SCD.
6001170
10
---
## Page 188
witnes
Pages 216 - 221 of the previous summary contain a summary
on the matter of the Pushiin Street deaddrop site which John ABIDIAN
visited on 30 December 1961. It should be noted that a current review
of the 1964 - 196ó interrogations of NOSENKO on this matter indicates
they were unable to clarily the matter and dia much to confuse the issue.
Current interviews, as indicated above, have not fully resolved
the problems, but have assisted in at least minimizing the areas of
conflict or confusion. It is apparent that NOSENKO was not in the First
Section, First Department, for any material period of time after
30 December 1901. It is also clear that he either read the surveillance
report on the visit of ABIDIAN to the Pushkin Street deaddrop site or
was fully briefed on the details of the visit. NOSENKO insists that he
read the surveillance report at the time or shortly after the event.
There is no reason to question his assertion that he read the report
since his accurate knowledge of the route of ABIDIAN and his actions
in connection with the visit support this claim. However, his consistent
inability on his own to approximate the date of the visit or relateit to
his change of assignments raises a question regarding when he actually
read the
report.
NOSENKO claims that the visit of ABIDIAN to the Pushkin Street
deaddrop area ledto the KGB setting uy a stationary surveillance posi
0001171
---
## Page 189
near the site which was maintained for three months and that he was
informed on a daily basis of the results of this stake out (always
negative). To take this statement literally would raisa further problem
since, in addition to his transfer from the First Department to the
Seventh Department as of early January 1962, NOSENKO went to
Geneva in mid-March 1962.
It is conceivable that, as he himself now maintains, he was kept
advised of developments or nondevelopments following the visit of
ABIDIAN to the Pushkin Street building by Veniamin KOZLOV, a Chief
of Department in the Seventh Directorate who had been known to
NOSENKO since 1953, or Vladislav KOVSHUK or Gennadiy GRYAZNOV,
Chief and Deputy Chief respectively of the First Section, First Depart-
ment.. Even so, however, his failure to call our attention to this matter
in June 1962 would seem to require explanation, especially in view of
the fact that he did warn us about the danger of operational letter mail-
ings by ABIDIAN -- a warning which would aypear clearly to have been
derived from KGB coverage of the activities of ABIDIAN in the spring-
summer of 1961.
It is to be noted that during the June 1962 meetings NOSENKO
was not specifically asked for any additional information regarding
any known or suspected intelligence activities of ABIDIAN. Beyond
0001172
12
...
---
## Page 190
this, NOSENKO himself has stated thai it did not occur to him to tell
us because the stake out had long since been dropped, it had revealed
nothing suspicious on the part of ABIDIAN or anyone else, and therefore
he had regarded it as insignificant.
This is not implausible.
Another possible explanation, however,
derived from the already noted inability of NOSENKO to pin down a date
for the visit, is that he learned of the stationary surveillance post if not
of the visit itself after his meetings with us in June 1962. It should be
noted in this context that with the public exposure of the PENKOVSKIY
case in the fall of 1962, the Pushkin Street deaddrop undoubtedly became
the subject of widespread interest within the KGB.
That NOSENKO is at a minimum still confused about the visit
OÍ ABIDIAN to the Pushkin Street deaddrop and its consequences is clear
from the record. While it is entirely possible that NOSENKO has con-
sciously exaggerated his involvement with the visit and its aftermati,
it is also possible that the evident distortions of his accounts of the
affair derive from honest confusion.
Current interviews and a check of the tapes of previous inter-
views leave no doubt that NOSENKO was aware of the visits of ABIDiAN
to the uppei Gorkiy Sireei area ciica March 1961. These visits by
ABIDIAN were for cover purposes and preceded his start of operational
0001173
13
---
## Page 191
SEUREI
letter mailing. NOSENKO consistently relates, and has furnished
drawings which substantiate, thai visits of ABIDIAN to a commission
shop, a next-door art shop, and a local post office in the area were
known to and considered suspicious by the KGB. The entrarce to the
art shop, according to NOSENKO, was so situated as to be an ideal
place for picking up or placing a deaddrop, and a mobile surveillance
was placed on the art shop for a period of time following the visit of
ABIDIAN. Official records confirm the visits of ABIDIAN at the time
and to the buildings described by NOSENKO.
Pages 216 - 220 of the previous summary contain no reíerence
to the specific statements of NOSENKO relative to KGB interest in the
visits of ABIDIAN to the upper Gorkiy Street area. It is also clear
from a review of certain transcripts of previous interrogations that
no differentiation was made concerning his statements relative to KGB
coverage of the activities of ABIDIAN in the upper Gorkiy Street area.
circa March 1961 and his statements concerning his knowledge of the
Pushkin Street deaddrop site after the visit of ABIDIAN to that site
(30 December 1961).
It is impossible at this time to state that a detailed debriefing
Of NOSENKO concerning ABIDIAN prior to hostile interrogation wouid
have permitted the clarification of all issues inciuding ihe abova, but
14
6001174
ASCRET
---
## Page 192
14-00000
there is no doubt that the hostile interrogation has confused matters to
the point where compiete clarification appears impossible. In any event,
one thing is clear - since he may well have transferred out of the First
Section, First Dapartment, by 31 December 1961 and most certainly hac
transferred by early. January 1962, the faci that NOSENKO has supplied
confused information regarding the Pushkin Street aifair cannot be used
to impugn his claim to having been case office for ABIDIAN from early
1960 until late 1901. Furthermore, the fact that NOSENKO is not able to
properly date the visit of ABIDIAN to Pushkin Street, is in no way indicative
of KGB dispatch. If dispatched, NOSENKO presumably would have had the
date right.
In regard to (b), the responsibility of NOSINKO for preliminary re-
view of reports from OTU (Technical Unit of KGBj of "take" from micro-
phones in the United States Embassy, the previous conclusion was that his
claim that he personally reviewed the KGB monitoring reports was not
sustained.
It is not felt that the previous conclusion made sufficient allow-
ance for the explanation of NOSENKO of what the responsibility actually
entailed. Information from microphones in the United States Embassy,
according to NOSENKO, was handled very specially. Telephone inter-
cepts were given to a designated office: fo: distribution to the appropriate
case officer, but microphone reports, io prevent wide dissemination even
0001175
within the First Section, ware brought daily to the Deputy Chies
: Of Is his
absence to the Chief and then were distributed to the individual responsible
15
---
## Page 193
SEVERA
case officer.
In this way, according to NOSENKO, no one below the
rank of Deputy Chiei was aware of the total microphone "take" from
the United States Embassy as received by the section.
As regards political type information, and according to NOSENKO
this was considered the most important by the KGB and OTU, NOSENKO
had no responsibility for review or ultimate dissemination of the infor-
mation to the Chief, SCD, the Chairman, KGB, or the Central Committee
since this was the responsibility of a unit in the office of the Chief, SCD.
NOSENKO has also stated that the output from certain of the
working microphones was "dying" and that OTU in addition to having
reception difficulties was also having difficulty obtaining a sufficient
number of qualified monitor-translators. As a result, according to
NOSENKO, OTU was not providing complete verbatim transcripts from
most microphones, but actually was reporting only those portions which
OIU considered pertinent. Despite the fact that full transcripts of all
conversations in areas covered by active microphones would have been
of interest to responsible officers
of the First Section, OTU, according
tO NOSENKO, did not provide full transcripts and whei asked to provide
more gave the routine answer of, "we could do so if we had more
personnel." According to NOSENKO, the tapes were mainiained at
OTU and could not be furnished to the First Section.
An officer or t
0001176
15
?
---
## Page 194
First Section could listen io a particulai tape but he had to go to OTU
to do so and as a result this was done very infrequently.
It is believed that any presumption that the KGB recoverad or
transcribed all conversations
even in the thirteen
areas listed by
NOSENKO as having active microphones is noi reasonable or even
realistic. It is also unrealistic to presume that any conversation con-
ducted within reasonable distance of an active microphone was not
compromised to the KGB. The latter is a factor to be considered in
any damage assessment; it is not an appropriate basis for a presumption
that NOSENKO had to have been aware of this or this just because some-
one had a conversation in one of the rooms in which there was an active .
microphone and NOSENKO has claimed he reviewed the "take" from
microphones in the United States Embassy.
It is apparent that there are a number of imponderable factors
to be considered such as whether the conversation could be picked up
by the microphone, whether the monitor could recover sufficient portions
of the conversation to understand the gist of what was being said, and
even if he did, whether he would consider it of suificient importance or
interest io include in his report in verbatim or in summary form.
In regard to (c), the claim of NOSENKO thai he was responsible
for maintenance of the physical security flie on the United States Embassy,
17
00011'77
---
## Page 195
it is not considered that there is an adequate basis for questioning
this claim.
The previous summary contained a conclusion thai the claim
of NOSENKO that he was custodian of the Embassy security file was
an invention. The basis for this conciusion was not then adequate and
current intezviews with NOSENKO have further indicated that his claim
on this point should be accepted.
In regard to (d), the claim of NOSENKO that he acted in place
of KOVSHUK, the Chief of First Section, when KOVSHUK was absent,
it is considered that this claim is acceptable providing it is not con-
verted into a presumption that therefore NOSINKO knew everything
that KOVSHUK knew.
NOSENKO claims that he was not responsible for the direct
supervision of approximately two-thirds of the officers in the First
Section. These officers normally reported directly to KOVSHUK and
would only report to NOSENKO when KOVSHUK was absent. As an
example of this, NOSENXO has shown a lack of detailed knowledge of
the work against diplomatic personnel in the United States Embassy.
He has stated he is süre he would have inown of anything "important"
such as a recruitment or attempied recruitment, but he does noi claim
to have reviewed all the reports of the various officers of the First
1S
SECRET
0001179
---
## Page 196
Section.
His recognition of the races of individuals at the United
States Embassy in 1960 - 1961 and even their assignments seems
adequate.
The previous criticisin that NOSINKO knew only the names
of most agents or operative contacts who were part of the KGB network
among the indigenous employees of the American Embassy, did not
recognize their photographs, and did not give sufficient details con-
cerning their specific activities is considered to be an unwarranted
criticism. NOSENKO indicates that in general the handling of agents
in the First Section was the responsibility of individual case officers.
It is also apparent that the philosophy in the KGB was to maintain
a single handler-agent relationship as much as possible, and that respon-
sibility for an agent would not be transferred merely because the agent
had access to a taiget who was the responsibility of a case officer other
than the handler of the agent. This apparent philosophy is of particulas
interest in connection with NOSENKO, who even though he was the case
oîficer responsible for ABIDIAN and together with KOSOLAPOV and
GRYAZNOV worked actively against code clerks, did not have an agent
network which he specifically handled. Mere use of an agent foi repori-
ing on or a specific activity againsi a particular target was normally
19
G001179
---
## Page 197
not an adequaie reason to transier responsibility for the agent and it
appears the KGB considers that the continuation of an established
handler-agent relationship has considerable merit.
NOSENKO, as previously indicated, has stated that he had the
responsibility for work againsi code clerks at the United States Embassy
during 1960 - 1961. Except for the period of time that he claims respon-
sibility for supervision of work against the Service Attaches in early
1960, he was, according to NOSENKO, responsible for supervision of
the work of Vadim A. KOSOLAPOV, Gennadiy I. GRYAZNOV, Vladimir
DEMKIN and Yevgeniy GROMAKOVSKIY.
GRYAZNOV and KOSOLAPOV worked only against code clerks
and therefore were supervised
solely by NOSENKO, whereas DEVKIN
and GROMAKOVSKIY, who handled indigenous agents in American
House, came under the supervision of NOSENKO only in those cases
where these agents were directed against code clerks.
It is quite clear that the knowledge of NOSENKO concerning the
code clerks, code machine mechanics and pouch clerks who, according
tO NOSENKO, were included in his targets in 1960 - 1961, was müch
greaier than his knowledge of any other catezury of American employees
at ine United States Embassy during this period excepi for AbiDiaN.
6001180
20
---
## Page 198
14-00000
(
(
.!
The following comments are concerned with several specific
cases in which, according to NOSENKO, there was an approach by the
KGB, interesting information was developed, or in which at least a
considerable amouri of specific work was carried out by NOSENKO,
KOSOLAPOV and GRYAZNOV.
The first case, (James STORSBERG) is covered on pages 105 -
177 of the previous summary. Little additional comment is considered
necessary on this case since there does not appear to be any adequate
reason to question the general story of NOSENKO in regard to the KGB
effort against|STORSBERG.
It is recognized and mentioned elsewhere that NOSENKO in 1962
exaggerated his personal involvement in the case, particularly in placing
himsel as present with GRIBANOV when the recruitment pitch was made
to SIORSBERG. NOSENKO has retracted this particular claira, but
there is no reason to doubt that he was engaged for approximately a year
in the planning and activities which preceded the unsuccessiul approach
to STORSBERG.
An issue was previously made over the timing of the approach
to STORSBERG since SICRSBIRG) dated this as October 1961, NOSENKO
has indicated about June 19ó1, and information from GOLITSYN, based
on remarks by KOVSHUK to him, had been interpreted as indicating the
21
0001181
---
## Page 199
14-00000
approach occurred at the "end of 1960."
NOSENKO, during current interviews, has given an acceptable
account of the (STORSBERG)case. He has stated that he cannot precisely
date the approach to STORSBIRG, bui lnat it occurred before the
approach at the Moscow airport to James KEYSERS (Juze 16, 1961)
because otherwise no action would have been taken against KEYSERS.
When recendy reinterviewed, (STORSBERG)continued to maintain
that the approach occurred in October 1961, but the incernal evidence in
his description of collateral events makes it clear that the approach had
to have taken place considerably earlier.
(Joseph MORONE; another code cierk at the United States Embassy,
who will be the subject of further discussion below, has been intesviewed
on the basis
of statements by STORSBERG) that MORONE) was present in
American House the night of the approach. Analysis of the statements
of MORONE clearly indicates that the events STORSBERG describes
could not have taker place later than the period February to early May
1961.
The best estimate possible at this time is thai the ayproach to
(STORSBERG occurred in March - April 1961, which is quite compatible
with the approximate dating of the approach by NOSENKO. In the face
of this approximation of the date of the approaca to STORSBERG, it is
0001182
22
---
## Page 200
believed reasonable to assume that the ramarks of KOVSHUK to
GOLITSYN in January 1901, as related by GOLITSYN concerning
a successíul operation againsi a military code clerk in Moscow at the
end of 1960, referred to STORSBERG, and thai KOVSHUK either was
referring to a compromise phase of the operation rather than the actual
approach, or was prematurely claiming anticipated success.
Pages 178 - 181 oí the previous summary contain information
in regard to the attempied defection operation against James XYSERS.
As of this time, it is considered that there are no discrepancies between
record information and information from NOSENKO which in any way
refiect against NOSENKO. KEYSERS dia not recognize a photograph
of NOSENKO as the Soviet who made a fast approach to him at the air-
port, but this does not provide a valid reason to disbelieve the statement
Of NOSENKO that it was he who tried to talk to KEYSERS.
There are certain statements relative to the KZYSERS case as
set forth in the previous summary which require specific comment.
(a) The statement is made that no KGB cilicer
directly connected with the case could regard KEYSERS)
as the replacement for STORSBERG. In fact, KEYSERS
actually was being trained by STORSBERGlas
a substitute,
not a replacement, even thoug. his primary assignment
0001183
23
COMET
---
## Page 201
(
te to coin to d
was not thât of a code cie.k.
NOSENKO has during
current interviews reiated dow he received the impression
from the OTU reports of conversations picked up by the
microphone in the Military code room at the United States
Embassy that KZYSERS either was not a code clerk or
had been away from code work for a considerable period
of time.
In azy event, the impression of NOSENKO was
that STORSBERG was having a difficul time expiaining
the particular work to KEYSERS. The observations of
NOSINKO are of interest since KEYSERS actually had
not been a code clerk but, as noted, was being trained
by STORSBERG so that he could act as a substitute. Under
the circumstances, it is considered quite logical that the
KGB would assume at the time that XEYSERS was to be the
eventual replacement of STORSBERG.
(b) The previous summary stated that, "prior to his
departure from Moscow, KEYSIRS acknowledged io his
supervisors /Colonel URBAN/ his homosexual tendencies
and he adritted involvement in three homosexual incidents,
all at the American House" (page 179).
0001184
24
SEGR
SET
---
## Page 202
(
Contrary to this assertion, a review of the
official memorandur, dated l6 June 1961, oí (Coionel,
(URBAN reflects that KEYSERS was not informed by
URBAN of the "allegations of homosexuality in order
not to aggravate the possibility of a rash act by him
while within the Soviet Union. "
(c) On page 23ó of the previous summary, the
statement is made that, "In the single case in which he,
ÑOSENKO/ asserted thai he relied on information pro-
cured from microphones (KEYSERS) failure to report
receipt of the defection invitation) he was in error."
While the official record shows that KEYSERS)
did indeed repori receipt of the defection latter to (Colonel)
(URBAN in the office of Coionel URBAN, it should be noted
that this occurred less than one hour before (KEYSERS left
the Embassy for the airpori. NOSENKO has stated that in
the absence of information to the contrary from microphone
and telephone taps, the KGB had concluded that KEYSERS)
had not reported receipt of the
defection letter and there-
fore had decided to approach KEYSERS at the airport.
In
view of the shori time between KEYSIRS report of receipt
0001185
25
---
## Page 203
(
of the letter and ais departure iron Moscow, it would
nave been remarkable i the iCE ad learned this in-
formation in time to cali off ine airport approach.
The
account Of NOSENKO in the|KEYSERS matter therefore
is considered completely credible.
Pages 181 - 184 of the previous summary contain information
in regard to Matthew ZUJUS, who succaaded James STORSBERG,
having arrived in Moscow in Septembez 1961. GRYAZNOV was the
responsible case officer for ZUJUS, according to NOSENKO.
The previous summary states (page 183) that ZUJUS, during a
routine debriefing, confirmed an Embassy report that in the summer of
1962 he had been intimate with an Austrian woman, "LILLIAN, " who.
visited the American House with someone from the United Ara's Republic.
"LILLIAN" was interviewed by the American House manager and sae
claimed to be from Vienna but traveling with her employer, a Czeca.
Further inquiry revealed that no Austrian passport had been issued to
"LILLIAN," and she was later asked for her passport. "LILLIAi"
replied that she had forgotten it, then leit, and did not return.
The previous summary stated that the above incident had beer
described by NOSENKO but in connection with artempts to entray Joseph
¡VORONE in 1960, not ZUJUS) in 1962.
6001186
2'6
---
## Page 204
14-00000
(
(
Page 194 of the pievious summary relates information from
NOSENKO hai GRYAZNOV went to Dasi Berlin in early 1960 to obtain
two German women who could be used against the residents of American
House
During current interviews, this matter has been again covered
with NOSENKO. According to NOSENKO, GRYAZNOV arranged for.
these two women, agents of the Berlin KGB Residentura, to visit Moscow
under false documentation, one as a West German and the other as an
Austrian. NOSENKO further identified the "West German" agent,
"HANNA, " as having the cover of a journalist, and stated he believed
"HANNA" had met MORONE at American House. In a racent interview,
MORONE confirmed that in early 1961 he had met a West German girl
at American House who claimed to be a journalist. The staïements of
MORONE therefore appear to substantiate the report of NOSENKO.
Concerning the agent documented as an Austrian, NOSENKO ze-
ported that she was queried about her passport at American House and
as a result the KGB returned her to East Germany without further
attempts to use her at American House. NOSENKO places this incident
in the same time period as the "HANNA"' case; i.e., 1960 - 1961. He
has never suggested any connection with ZUJUS, nor is there reason
to assume that he could be referring to the experience of ZUJUS) since
this iook place in the summer of 1962, alter NOSENKO had leit the
American Embassy Section.
0001187
27
---
## Page 205
(
• •I
It was the conclusion of the previous summary that NOSENKO
dia noi know enough about ZUJUS oi his background to have exercised
any supervision in the development of ZUJUS. Granted that NOSENKO
did not know many details regarding ZUJUS, the fact is that NOSENKO
left the First Section, First Depariment, ât the end of 1961 at wnich
time any supervisory functions of NOSENKO terminated. ZUJUS, who
did not arrive in Moscow until Septembe: 1961, remained in Voscow
until January 1963. NOSENKO could hardly be held responsible for
knowing anything about ZUJUS after 1 January 1962.
Pages 185 - 189 of the previous summary contain a synopsis of
previous information from NOSINKO in regard to Paul JENNER)
Basically, NOSENKO had reported that when the KGB learned that
(Paul JENNER, who was thought to be a code clerk, was coming to
Moscow through Helsinki, a plan was made to send Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV
to Helsinki to travel on the same train as JENNER) to Moscow. A female
agent of GRYAZNOV was to be placed on this train at Vyborg after the
train entered the USSR. The female agent was to become acquainted
with JENNER as a part of a future operation against JENNER) in Moscow,
and ROSOLAPOV was also to become acquainted with (JENNER.
NOSENKO has stated that the operation was successful, that both
ROSOLAPOV and the ¡emale agent made the acquaintance of JENNER,
28
SEGRET
6001188
---
## Page 206
14-00000
....:
and that he, NOSENKO, read the report submitted by KOSOLAPOV on
ine trip from helsinici to Moscow.
JENNER, after arriving in ivoscow, reported that he was
approached on the train from Helsinki by two young Russiars, "a boy.
and a giri, probably university students," who struck up a conversation.
According to JENNER, they both said that they might see JENNER in
Voscow. About three months later JENNER) reported being approached
again by the same girl, this time at the Moscow airport wherd he had
gone on courier business. There was a short conversation and she gave
JENNER a phone number, insisting that he call her.
The woman also
advised JENNER not to mention the conversation to anyone. NOSENKO
has stated that in an effort to follow up the initial train acquaintance,
the KGB had arranged for the female agent to encounter (JENNER) at
the Moscow railroad station or airport when he went alone to meet
couriers.
Insofar as is known, JENNER)has never been shown a photograph
Of KOSOLAPOV. Although KOSOLAPOV was approximately 34 years of
age in
1960, his photograph and remarks by NOSENKO indicate that in
appearance he was much younger and that he couid have passed as a
university student.
0001189
29
-o..
---
## Page 207
14-00000
During current interviews, NOSENKO nas repeated the same
general story as regards Paul JENNER. He still insists that KOSOLAPOV
was on the same train with JENNER from Heisiaki. Collateral infor-
mation raises difficulties here, however: Finnish train manifests
indicate that JENNER was the only Moscow-bound passenger os the
31) March 1960 train from Finland to Moscow, and that one Viktor
KOLOSSOV (a name NOSENKO has identified as an alias used by
KOSOLAPOV) was on the 2 April 1960 train io Voscow.
The above obvious discrepancy has not beer and cannot be clari-
fied with available information. KOSOLAPOV (KOLOSSOV) was either
on the same train as JENNER or he was not. Train manifests indicate
that KOSOLAPOV was not. Nevertheless, the "boy and girl, probably
university students" who, according to JENNER, struck up a conver-
sation with him on the train would appear clearly to be part of the
operational effort described by NOSENKO, particularly in view of the
later approach of this same girl to JENNER at the airport. There is
no reason io question that this girl was the female agert of CRYAZNOV.
In view of the conflict between the train manifest and statements by
NOSENKO, however, it is not clear who the "boy student" was: whether
this somehow was KOSOLAPOV, or whether it may have been some
other person entirely.
0001190
30
$E020A
---
## Page 208
..... i
It is not accepted that the train manifests are incontrovertible
evidence thai KOSOLAPOV could not have been on ine same train as
(JENNER. Neither is it accepted thai the train manifests are in error.
There is just not a satisfactory answer for the indicated discrepancy
between the train manifests and the statement of NOSENKO that
KOSOLAPOV and JENNER were on the same train. If indeed KOSOLAPOV
did not travel with JENNER, this does not establish anything more than
that NOSENKO is wrong; it is evidence that he does not low something
he, as the supervisor of ROSOLAPOV, should have known according to
his own statements.
Pages 190 - 192 contain a summary of previous information in
regard to the John GARLAND case. GARLAND)was identified by
NOSENKO as a code clerk whom the KGB was studying, but on whom
no derogatory information was developed. NOSENKO provided practically
no details in regard to GARLAND other than to identily him as a code
clerk.
GOLITSYN has reported on an incident which it is considered
relates to the trip of GARLAND from Heisinki to Moscow on ló November
1960. GOLITSYN reported that in November 1960 the Helsinki KGB
Residency received a Cable from Moscow advising that an Americai
code clerk would be arriving in Helsinki en route to voscow and that
0001191
31
SCODET
---
## Page 209
the responsible SCD case officer, KOSCIAPOV, would be sent to Helsinki
under alias to sirike up an acquaintance with the code clerk which the
SCD hoped to continue in Noscow. GOLITSYN talked to KOSOLAPOV
in Helsinki at that time, and the Residency procured for KOSOLAPOV
a place in the compartment of the American on the train from Helsinki
to Moscow.
The previous summary also stated GOLITSYN had advised that
läter in Helsinki he inquired of another SCD officer "from the Embassy
Section" (First Section, SCD) about the case on which he had aelped
KOSOLAPOV. According to GOLITSYN,
the officer refused to discuss
the case and be, GOLITSYN, concluded from this reaction that it must
have resulted in a successful recruitment.
It has been determined that GOLITSYN, in an interview with the
FBI on 20 March 1962, referred to the above "SCD officer from the
Enibassy Section" as (fnu) ZENKIN of the American Department.
GOLIISYN also stated that the officer was in Helsinki under the alias
Of SERGEEV (SERGIYEV), but was unabie to furnish a first name and
patronymic for SERGEYEV. GOLITSYN referred to (inu) ZENKiN as
being from the American Department, SCD.
It is considered that there is no doubt that the (inu) ZEXXIN
zeferred io by GOilTSYN is the individual of the same last name
32
0001192
---
## Page 210
14-00000
Yourse.
concerning whom NOSENKO has furnished information. NOSENKO
has identified ZENKIN (whose first name he does not recall but
possibly is Yuriy) as an officer of the Second Section, First Depari-
ment, SCD. According to NOSINKO, one group of the Second Section
both before and after 1960 - 1961 was engaged in "operative games"
against American Inteiligence and that ZENKIN was a member of this
group. NOSENKO has advised that ZENKIN traveled abroad in connection
with activities of the Second Section, but that he had no specific knowledge
regarding the activities of ZENKIN on these trips. NOSENKO has fur-
nished some fragmentary information which he learned in regard to
ZENKIN and when the full name of SERGEYEV (ZENKIN) together with
his photograph is obtained, this fragmentary information from NOSENKO
may prove quite useful.
As regards the KOSOLAPOV-GARLAND matter and the opirion
expressed by GOLITSYN based on the refusal of ZENKIN to discuss the.
case (GARLAND) that it must have resulted in a successiul recruitment,
there appears to be an inadequate basis for this presumption. According
to NOSENKO, and there is no reason to disbelieve NOSENKO on this
point, ZENKIN was in the Second Section, not the First Section, in
1950 - 1961. He was not Chief of the Section, but only a Senior Case
33
SECRET
0001193
---
## Page 211
14-00000
Officer.
Since KOSOLAPOV. was an officer of the First Section and
the work against GARLAND was the responsibility of the First Section,
it does noi appear that ZINKIN would necessarily have knowof any
developments in the KOSOLAPOV-GARLAND) matter.
The Finnish train manifest of 16 November 1960 for the Helsinki
to Moscow train lists John GARLAND' and Viktor KOLOSSOV (alias of
KOSOLAPOV) as passengers. GARLAND, when interviewed in 1962
following the lead from GOLITSYN, deried having met any Soviet with
the physical description of KOSOLAPOV on the Heisinki-to-Moscow.
trip, and denied ever being approached by Soviet Intelligence. Later
interviews by the FBI and a polygraph interview did not indicate that he
hãd ever met KOSOLAPOV or that he had ever knowingly been contacted
by any foreign intelligence agent.
It is accepted that KOSOLAPOV went from Moscow to Helsinki
in November 1960, that he talked with GOLITSYN there, and that he
was on the same train as GARLAND from Helsinki to Moscow. It is
also accepted that NOSENKO is unaware that KOSOLAPOV made a trip
to Helsinki in November 1960.
Travel for an SCD officer outside the USSR o Bloc countries
requires high-level approval, according to NOSENKO. It does not
0001194
34
---
## Page 212
14-00000
(
matter that the incividual has previously traveied on a similar mission,
each trip must have
specific high-level approval.
The red tape which
thus must inevitably nave been involved in preparation ior such a trip
further supports the assumption that NOSENKO should have known about
the KOSOLAPOV-GARLAND trip.
The position taken by NOSENKO on this point is that he accepts
the statement by the interviewer that KOSOLAPOV made süch a trip,
but he says that he, NOSENKO, simply does not know anything about
it. He adds only that had anything significant developed in the study
Of GARLAND, he would have been aware of it.
NOSENKO, as supervisor of the group working against code
clerks, should have known of any trip of KOSOLAPOV to Finland in
1960 or 1961. NOSENKO himself was out of Voscow on a trip to Cuba
from 15 November 1960 to circa 17 December 1960. The possibility
exists that this could have accounted for his lack of knowledge of the
trip of KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki and return to Moscow on 16 November
1960. However, NOSENKO has not attempted to use his Cuban trip as
a possible explanation for not knowing of the November KOSOLAPOV
trip.
As with the JENNER, KOSOLAPOV case, it is not possible at
this time to
resolve the discrepancies pertairing to the GARLAND;
KOSOLAPON trip. The fact thet NOSaNKO danies any kobullie
35
---
## Page 213
(
this operational activity of KOSOLAPOV is another apparent instance,
as in the JENNER
case, of his not kaowing something he, by his own
statements,
should have known.
Viewed in the coniext of the total knowledge of NOSENKO of
operations against code clerks, however, neither the problems in the
'JENNER case nor those in the GARLAND case, singly or combined,
in any way represent conclusive evidence that NOSENKO was not super-
VISOr
Of KOSOLAPOV or that he was not responsible for the code clerk
operations described by NOSENKO. This statement, however, was not
substantiated in the previous summary.
Pages 193 - 199 of the previous summary contain an account of
KGB activity against code clerk Joseph MORONE from various sources,
including NOSENKO. NOSENKO first mentioned the case in 1962.
According to NOSENKO, the responsible case officer for work
against MORONE was KOSOLAPOV. When it was learned that MORONE
and an Embassy colleague, a Marine guard by the name of|BEGGS, were
pianning a vacation trip to Warsaw, arrangements were made with the
UB (the Polish Security Service) for a female Polish agent to come to
Moscow and travel from there to Warsaw on the same train as MORONE)
and BEGGS. The intent was for the agent, either on the train or sub-
seguently in Warsaw, to meet and compromise MORONE sexually. She
0001196
36
37291
---
## Page 214
successfully accompiished this, but due to certain problems in KGB-UB
liaison relations, it was not possible for the KGB io expioit this directly.
The previous summary stated that with respeci to the female
UB agent, there was persuasive evidence that neither NOSENKO nor
KOSOLAPOV played the roies in the MORONE case described by
NOSENKO. That summary cited the travel of NOSENKO to Cuba and
Of KOSOLAPOV to finiand at approximately the same time as the MORONE
trip to Warsaw as evidence of the impossibility of NOSENKO ana
KOSOLAPOY being invoived personally in this part of the iVORONI
case.
NOSENKO has stated that KOSOLAPOV met the Polish female
agent and made the arrangements to place her on the train to Warsaw.
(MORONE and BEGGS) departed Moscow on 12 November 1960. it is not
known when KOSOLAPOV left Moscow for Helsinki, but he was on the
16 November 1960 train manifest as departing Helsinki for vioscow.
NOSENKO departed Moscow on 15 November 1960 for Cuba. The
activities described by NOSENKO are therefore possibie within the
known time frame.
It is clear that NOSENKO in 1962 exaggerated his personal role
in the MORONE) case, particularly when he staied that he, NOSENKO,
placed the female agent on the train. NOSENKO now clearly states that
6001197
37
---
## Page 215
14-00000
KOSOLAPOV was the oniy ICB officer in contact with the
Polish agent.
NOSENKO previously stated that a KGB technician who was on the train
from Moscow to Warsaw reported back to NOSENKO the day after the
train arrived in Warsaw. Later NOSENKO said that instead of talking
to the technician personally, he may have read the report of the technician
after he returned from Cuba.
The activities described by NOSENKO with regard to this matter
are accordingly possible within the known time frame. It is not con-
sidered that the retractions NCS ENKO has made from his original
statements on this operation are of sufficient significance to materially
discredit him.
Page 198 of the previous summary contains the statement that
MORONE, when interviewed, denied having been intimate with Svetlana
IVANOVA, a KGB agent employed at the American House. NOSENKO
had stated that IVANOVA was instructed to report everything she saw
or heard concerning/MORONE (page 194). The summary, however,
cited a number of reports that MORONE had been intimate with IVANOVA
and with Ella UMANETS, also a KGB agent employed at the American
House, and commented that NOSENKO therefore was apparently unaware
of the sexual involvement of MORONE with "IVANOVA's friends."
0001198
38
SESRET
---
## Page 216
14-00000
(
(
NOSENKO, during cuirent inierviews, has indicated awareness
ofat least some invoivement of IVANOVA with MORONE. He has fur-
nished information on a developing operation against Marine guard
¡GARCIA (Anthony A. GARCIA) based on the involvement of GARCIA)
with IVANOVA. He has also stated that the possibility was considered
of using IVANOVA against MORONE to obtain compromising photographs.
This plan was seriously affected when it was learned from the
militiaman/KGB guard at the United States Embassy that IVANOVA,
her girl friend, MORONIand a Varine guard, possibly GARCiA, had
been in the city," then returned to the "flat" of one of the Marines
where the girls spent the night. This apparently placed the reliability
Of IVANOVA in question in the eyes of the First Section.
According to the previous summary, NOSENKO stated that Pietro
CECCHI, Italian cook ai the American Embassy and agent of KOSOLAPOV,
reported on Americans at the Embassy, but NOSENKO recalled nothing
specific that CECCHI had reported about MORONE. The summary also
states that MORONE was said by other American Embassy employees
to be a close friend of CECCHI and that MORONE)had admitted black
market money exchanges with CECCHI.
During current interviews, NOSENKO has stated that CECCHI
furnished "pieces" of information concerning MORONE, but he, NOSENKO,
0001199
39
SEGREY
---
## Page 217
14-00000
(
knew of no black market involvement of MORONE with CECCHI.
NOSENKO has aiso indicated that the KGB sometimes suspected,
and on occasion actually became aware that various agents did not
fully report everything of interest to the KGB. The KGB of course
was aware that CECCHI was involved in the biack market. However,
whether he reported to the KGB everything he did and with whom is
open to question; viz., the Maurice ZWANG) case below.
The comment was made in the previous summary that NOSENKO
was unaware that MORONE/met some Soviet females in the spring of
1961 at the apartment of Saiwat el SHAZLY, an Egyptian-national KGB
agent of the Sixth Department who was also reporting on Americans,
and was intimate with one in this apartment.
A review of oificial records indicates that VORONE) did report
having met some Soviet girls at the apartment of Sarwat, but there is
no indication that he admitted or that anyone else has reported that he
was intimate with any of them. The conclusion of the previous summary
in this regard was based on a misinterpretation. Accordingly, since
there is no reason to believe that any compromise incident took place
in the Sarwat apartment, the story of NOSENKO on this matter is con-
sidered completely acceptable.
(
40
6001200
---
## Page 218
14-00000
3E0211
(
A few comments are appropriate concerning iemarks in the
previous summary on pages 199 - 204. Comments were made there
concerning five code clerks, Maurice ZWANG, John TAYLOR, Frank)
(DAY, Robert DWELLY and Joseph GAFFEY, and although it is not
specifically stated, the suggestion is apparent that the reporting of
NOSENKO on these cases was considered evidence that NOSENKO was
• not supervisor of all KGB operations against code clerks. The follow-
ing observations may assist in placing these cases in their proper
perspective:
(a) Maurice ZWANG - ZWANG was identified by
NOSENKO as
a code clerk who was actively "worked on"
during 1960 - 1961. The previous summary suggested
that the knowledge of NOSENKO regarding KGB activity
against ZWANG was inadequate. First, reporting of
NOSENKO on ZWANG contained no reference to the
relationship of ZWANG with his maid, whom NOSENKO
in another case has identifiea as a KGB agent. Although
ZWANG) denied sexual relations with his maid, he did
admit to some intimacies with her in her apartment.
During polygraph examination ZWANG) reacted when he
41
0001261
---
## Page 219
14-00000
responded in the negative to a question regarding sexual
relations with his maid.
The iailure of NOSENKO to re-
port on this relationship can be ascribed to ignorance,
but also can be piausibly explained by faulty memory on
his part or failure on the part oi the maid to report details
of this relationship to the KGB.
Second, NOSENKO had not reported that (ZWANG)
was involved in the currency operations of Pietro CICCHI.
(A fact that previous summary implied he should have
known from KGB agent CECCHI.) From the record, cow-
ever, it appears that the dealings of ZWANG were not
directly with CECCHI, but rather through other Embassy
employees, making it plausible that CECCHI was either
unaware of the involvement of ZWANG Or, as NOSENKO
himself stated he suspected, CECCHI did not report all
details of his currency operations to his KGB handier.
(b) (John TAYLOR - NOSENKO identified TAYLOR
as a State Department code clerk)and target of KOSOLAPOV.
The KGB was aware of the involverent of (TAYLOR) with
his Soviet maid, but no attempt was made to recruit TAYLOR)
before his departure in early 19ó1 since to do so might
42
0001202
STORE:
---
## Page 220
14-00000
endanger the pians for a recruitment approach to James:
STORSBERG, who had been inder development for almost
a year and was considered more valuable.
The implication of the previous summary that
the explanation given by NOSENKO was subject to question
failed to take into account the fact that although STORSBERG)
was not approached until after the departure of IAYLOR;
the operation against STORSBERG was underway before
(TAYLOR became involved with his maid.
Further, it is
apparent that the KGB did not abandon interest in TAYLOR
since he was approached at a later date outside the USSR
on the basis of his previous affair with his maid in Moscow.
(c) (Frank DAY - NOSENKO identified' Frank DAY'as
a State Department code clerk|who was the target of either
KOSOLAPOV or GRYAZNOV. According to NOSENKO,
nothing "interesting" was learned about DAY) and no oper-
ational measures were taken against DAY. The previous
summary noted that in July 1961, DAY) traveled to the
Caucasus with his friend and former overt CIA employee,
Agriculiural Attache G. Stanley BROWN.' It was also
stated that the two were under surveillance by five persons
43
0001203
VE022T
---
## Page 221
(
SEGRETA
at all times on the above trip, that they found a "repairman"
in their hotel room wien way unexpectedly returned, and
that on another
occasion an "a'tractive and available Soviet
female" was believed to have been planted in their train
compartment.
According to NOSENKO, surveillance and any other
local coverage of any employee ai the United States Embassy
who travels in the USSR is the responsibility of the locál
KGB organization, not the SCD. It would appear that the
local organization was trying to do a thorough job on DAY!
and BROWN, but it apparently was nonproductive. It does
not seem justifiable to expect that NOSENKO should have
recalled a trip which produced no results.
(d) Robert DWELLY - NOSENKO has related in con-
siderable detail the efforts of NOSENKO, GRYAZNOV and
KOSOLAPOV to involve Robert DWELLY, a code clerk) in
Moscow from April 1959 - July 1960, in a homosexual com-
promise operation. According to NOSENKO, a homosexual
agent of GRYAZNOV was of the opinion (DWELLY was a
homosexual.
6001204
44
SEGRET
---
## Page 222
(
• in .
There is no reason to doubt the statement of
NOSENKO concerning KGB efforts to determine when
and where DWELLY was going "into the city" (Moscow)
so that a homosexual compromise situation could be
arranged. There were no specific developments from
their efforts, according to NOSENKO.
(DWELLY has categorically denied being a homo-
sexual; NOSENKO has not said he was, but only that the
homosexual agent of GRYAZNOV assessed DWELLY) as.
a homosexual. There does not appear to be any reason
to
consider the statements of NOSENKO about DWELLY
as
reflecting adversely on NOSENKO.
(e) Joseph GAFFEY - NOSENKO has identified
'Joseph GAFFEY as a code clerk. The previous summary
noted that NOSENKO had stated the KGB had tried to lure
GAFFEY into downtown Moscow, using Svetlana IVANOVA,
an agent of DEMKIN in the American House.
By way of comment, the previous summary stated.
that GAFFEY arrived in Moscow in September 196i and
that Fred KADERA;had reported that GAFFEY had told him
he had been intimaïe with a Russian girl at the AmeNitrF2C5
45
SECRET
---
## Page 223
14-00000
House. It was further noted that GAFFEY was recalled:
from Moscow in the summer oi 1962 because of drunken-
ness and during interview had admitted being intimate
with IVANOVA at the American House and at her apart-
ment and that she had claimed pregnancy.
As to whether the above information raises a
question concerning NOSENKO, the following factors
should be considered:
(1) NOSENKO has stated that during the
latter part of December 1961 he was part time
in the First Department and part time in the
Seventh Department,
and that he reported full
time to the Seventh Department after New
Years Day 1962.
(2) In addition to the information previously
mentioned as furnished by GAFFEY during inter-
view, GAFFEY also stated that he was first
intimate with IVANOVA in his room on 27 December
1951 and was also intimate with her later on three
occasions at her apartment. According to GAFFEY,
IVANOVA told him of her pregnancy about i May
46
SECRET
0001206
---
## Page 224
1962, which is approximately four months after
NOSENKO has stated he transierred to the Seventa
Department.
The matter of review by NOSENKO of OTU reports from micio-
phone coverage on the United States Embassy has previously been
mentioned in this summary. Pages 226 - 236 of the previous summary
contained a detailed account of information from NOSENKO on the matter
of microphones, countermeasures taken by the Americans in 1964, and
damage estimates prepared by the Americans. The previous conclusion
was that his information did not sustain his claim to have been Deputy
Chief, First Section, or his claim that he personally reviewed the KGB
microphone monitoring reports. Comments have been made in this
summary in regard to this previous conclusion.
A few remarks, it is believed, will assist in a fuller understandina
of the microphone matter. In the material brought out by NOSENKO ii
1964, there was a single sheet of paper containing on one side hand-
written notes which NOSENKO identified as a list of the active micro-
phones (those which were being monitored) in the United States Embassy.
This list is given on page 227 of the previous summary and need not be
rapeated here. The acquisition of this list by NOSENKO was character-
ized in the previous summary as singular and it was stated thai NOSENKO
0001207
47
---
## Page 225
14-00000
has
never plausibly explained the circumstances which prompted his
retention of the list until 1964, when he produced it for CIA in Geneva.
During current interviews, the matter of the above list has been
covered in considerably greater detail with NOSENKO than had been
done before. His explanation, both of the circumstances which led to
his acquiring the list as well as of his still having it in his possession
at the time of his defection, is considered plausible, contrary to the
judgment of the previous summary.
NOSENKO has stated that in 1960 - 1961 Vladimir I. PETROV,
Chief of the Second Section, First Department, desired some "points"
for use against targets of his section. NOSENKO uses the term "point"
not as meaning just a microphone, but as referring to an OTU sub-unit
which includes microphones as well as the necessary monitors and
translators to cover the microphone and translate the "take." The
targets of PETROV were primarily Americans and, therefore, there
was a transcription-translation problem.
According to NOSENKO, most of the available "points" were
assigned to the First Section to cover microphones in the United States
Embassy. The Chief of the First Department, Viadimir A. KLYPIN,
held a meeting attended by KLYPIN, Chief of the First Section Viadislav
KOVSHUK, Vladimir
I. PETROV, and NOSENKO, the purpose of waich
0001208
48
6:0357
---
## Page 226
14-00000
was to discuss the possibility of temporarily discontinuing certain
Embassy "points" controlled by the First Section, and permitting
PETROV to use these "points" against targets of his section.
According to NOSINKO, PETROV brought to the meeting a list
of names of certain targets to which he wished to give technical cover-
age. During the meeting, KOVSHUK apparently took a piece of paper
which PETROV had and wrote on it a list of active microphones in the
United States Embassy and residences. When the meeting ended,
NOSENKO had this paper and he took it back to his office.
Contained on the reverse side of the paper were the iollowing
names in Russian: (LUBIN, SMITH, Will BURTIN, and Sipe BURTIN.
The name A. A. MIKHAYLOV was listed next to the name of LUBIN,
and the name of Y. E. CHERNETSEV was listed next to the name of
SMITH. NOSENKO has explained that LUBIN, SMITH, Will BURTIN,
and Sipe BURIIN were among the targets of PETROV; and MIKHAYLOV
and CHERNETSEV were officers of the Second Section.
NOSENKO stated he knew nothing more about the four non-Soviet
names except that they were targets of PETROV. NOSENKO stated that
he could not be positive of the date of the meeting other than that it
occurred while KLYPIN was Chief of the First Departmea. (According
tO NOSENKO, KLYPIN was succeeded by Sergey Mi. FEDOSEYEV as
0001209
49
9222-7
Done.
---
## Page 227
14-00000
Chief of the First Department in Circa mid-1961.) Research in regard
to the four non-Soviei names leaves 10 doubt that|LUBIN is George;
(LUBIN; and that Will SURTIN and Sipe BURTINare correct names,
with Sipe being the wife of Will BURTIN) All three are American
citizens who were in the USSR circa June 1961. (SMITH) at this time,
has still not been identified.
In view of the above, it has been possible to deduce the date
of the meeting called by KLYPIN as circa June 1961.
According to NOSENKO, the piece of paper described above
was placed by NOSENKO with other notes he kept between the pages
of a bound volume which NOSENKO calls a "working copy." This,
according to NOSENKO, was an accountable, registered notebook
issued to all officers in which they were supposed to write all their
notes,
destroying any other notes.
According to NOSENKO, he, like many other officers, did not
completely follow regulations and the tendency was to frequently put
loose notes in the notebook so that the notebook often acted as a file
rather than being used in the way required by regulations. NOSENKO
has stated that when he left the First Section he took various notes
with him to the Seventh Department; these included notes he had drafted
concerning certain First Section activities for use in briefing FEDOSEYEV
0001210
50
SECRET
---
## Page 228
14-00000
SEONGI
when FEDOSEYEV succeeded KLYPIN, and notes he had prepared for
lectures to the Seventh Directorate. According to NOSENKO, he did
not intentionally take the particular paper pertaining to microphones;
it was just in the group oi notes he took along when he went to the Seventh
Department.
In consideration of the above explanation by NOSENKO, it should
be noted that he also brought with him in 1964 his notes for the briefing
of FEDOSEYEV and certain notes he obviously had also prepared while
in the First Section; e. g., his notes for a lecture to the Seventh
Directorate in regard to a "mass surveillance" on the American
Embassy.
By including a section (pages 236 - 239) on the knowledge of
NOSENKO of the KGB cryptologic attack on United States Embassy
communications, the previous summary implies that there is some
reason to question his information on this subject.
NOSENKO has asserted that the KGB had never succeeded in
reading enciphered communications of the Service Attaches; however,
he said that the Eighth Directorate (the unit of the KGB responsible for
communications intercept and cryptologic analysis) was reading some
United States Embassy traffic. While it is open to question to what
extent knowledge of successes of the Eighth Directorate would be known
C001211
51
---
## Page 229
to anyone in the First Section of the First Department, within the
scope plausibly availabie to NOSENKO in his claimed position, there
is no reason to question his statement.
In the previous summary (pages 240 - 248), the failures or
successes of NOSENKO in identifying CIA officers are noted. With
the exception of ABIDIAN, NOSENKO does not claim to have been the
responsible case officer for any of the listed CIA officers. According
to his claim, NOSENKO should have been aware that William N. MORELI
was CIA, but he hasnever identified MORELL as CIA. Surely KOVSHUK
knew MORELL was CIA but why NOSENKO is not aware MORELI was
CIA is not known. It has already been established, however, that
NOSENKO, as Deputy Chief, was not aware of all of the activities of
KOVSHUK.
are appropriate.
As regards some of the other listed individuals, a few remarks
(a) NOSENKO has never indicated any knowledge
Paul GARBLER was CIA, and yet GARBLER was surely
known to the FCD as a CIA employee before going to
Moscow. It is presumed that the FCD furnished the SCD
at least basic information that Paul GARBLER was
"American Intelligence." GARBLER, however, did not
0001212
52
SEGRET
---
## Page 230
14-00000
and ines.
arrive in Voscow until Noverber 1961, only a month
before NOSENKO left the First Section for the Seventh
Department.
(b) The previous summary stated that according
tO NOSENKO the KGB did not suspect that
was a CIA officer, yet he was a CIA officer.
It was also stated that
reported the presence
of intensive KGB surveillance while in Moscow irom
October 1960 to September 1961. The "intensive KGB
surveillance" is based on statements of
and
may possibly be more a reflection of his personal concern
over surveillance rather than what was actually happening.
(c) Steve WASHENKO was correctly identified by
NOSENKO as CIA. William HORBALY was CIA and
identified by NOSENKO as suspected of being a CIA officer
or cooptee.
(d) Lewis BOWDEN, who was not CIA, was, according
to NOSENKO, suspected of being a CIA officer.
George Payne WINTERS, JI., has stated that
ROVSHUK warned WINTERS that BOWDEN was the "FBI
officer" in the Embassy. The Cherepanov Papers indicate
0001213
53
SEGRET
---
## Page 231
that the KC Lad reasons to cossider the activitles of
BOWDEN with suspleion.
It is not balleved that the linted Sallures of NOSENKO to identliy
CIA officera are of partiesist significance is establishing that be was
0s was not Deputy Chial of the First Sacion. There ara too many run-
1n0r factors which would sand to be considered. Despite our asmump-
fione so to whas the KGB knows, l1 1s possiblo that (a) t2e KGS did not
low of the ClA afflintion of than people, (D) le taformation Inowa
to tha KGS was not avallable at the first Sectios, Firn Department,
Jovel, or (c) information available to the Chiel of tha Firaz Section or
to a spoelde cane ollicer was of no official concern to NOSENKO and
was 201 made avallablo to him. The last of those posalbilities de
suggested in spite of claires by NOSINKO that he had to have noma
whatever waa known in the Section regarding CIA identifications; a
propensity on she part of NOSENKO to exeggerate the aren of his owr
knowledgeability ban been seen alsewhere lo this caso.
Pages 252 - 258 al tha previous summary contais a report of
the 1960 zip of NOSENKO to Cuba and his 1961 trip to Bulgaria. Wich
regara to the Caba trip, there la collateral ovidence of lis travel as
described by NOSENXO, and there la so aubutantire senson to doube
his account of his activides on thia trip. The statement was made la
54
0001214
---
## Page 232
14-00000
this:
(
the previous summary that the travel of NOSENKO to Cuba in 1960
damaged his claim that he was supervising operations against Embassy
code clerks at the time. To accepi the validity of this judgment is to
say that no supervisor in the SCD would be permitted to make a trip
abroad unrelated to his supervisory function, a judgment for which
there is no supporting evidence.
As regards the trip of NOSENKO to Bulgaria in 1961, for which
there is no collateral information, the previous summary concluded
that his account of the trip was untrue and argued that such a trip to
Bulgaria, if it did take place,
at a time when he claimed the operation
against |STORSBERG was reaching a climax and his subordinates were
"apparently planning to exploit KEYSERS) newly-discovered vulnerability, "
it would indicate thai the presence of NOSENKO in Moscow was dis-
pensable. There was, however, no evidence that NOSENKO did not
travel to Bulgaria and only highly speculative reasoning as to why his
account of the purpose of the trip was untrue.
As to the (STORSBERG) case, while it cannot at present be proved
that the recruitment pitch took place before NOSENKO left for Bulgaria,
it can be stated, on the basis of reporting from MORONE, that it had to
nave taken place before the time NOSENKO returned from Bulgaria.
Since no serious quesda has ever been raised concerning the fillence
55
8300 97
---
## Page 233
of NOSENIO in Moscow at the time this pitch was made, it would appear
that NOSENKO was comparatively free to go to Bulgaria because this
phase of the (STORSBERG) operation had been completed.
As to the KEYSERS case, there is no apparent probier since
it is clear that the approach to KEYSERS took place aiter NOSENKO
returned from Bulgaria, and furthermore that the KGB probably did
not become aware that KEYSERS was a homosexual, and thereíore
potentially vulnerable, until just before the pitch was made.
In short, there is no reason to believe that the accounts by
NOSENKO of his trips to Cuba and to Bulgaria are not essentially true,
or that if they are true they necessarily reflect on his claim to having
been supervisor of code clerk operations.
0001216
56
S50RE7
---
## Page 234
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 235
14-00000
SECRET
F.
NOSENKO'S CLAIMS, THAI IN 1962 HE WAS CHIEF
OF THE AMERICAN-BRITISE COMMONWEALTH SECTION AND
WAS THEREAFTER A DEPUTY CHIEF OF THE SEVENTH
DEPARIMENT; ARE NOT CREDIBLE
0001217
SECRET
---
## Page 236
SECRET
F. NOSENKO's claims, that in 1962 he was Chief of the
American-British Commonwealth Section and was thereafter a
Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department, are not credible. (Previous
conclusion)
The conclusion of this summary is that NOSENKO was Chief
of the American-British Commonwealth Section (First Section) from
January 1962 to July 1962 and that he was a Deputy Chief of the Seventh
Department thereafter.
NOSENKO has stated that, although he was offered the position
of a Deputy Chief of the First Department, SCD, by Oleg M. GRIBANOV,
Chief, SCD, and although an order had been prepared and was in the
Personnel Directorate, he declined the proffered position.
According to NOSENKO, he knew that Sergey Mikhaylovich
FEDOSEYEV, the Chief of the First Department, did not want NOSENKO
as a Deputy Chief, but instead wanted to promote Vladislav KOVSHUK,
then Chief of the First Section, to the position. FEDOSEYEV was
SECRET
C001218
cumigrating and
---
## Page 237
SECRET
willing to promote NOSENKO to the position of Chief, First Section.
However, GRIBANOV did not wish to promote KOVSHUK and NOSENKO
considered that under the circumstances it would be better for him to
return to the Seventh Department rather than to become a Deputy to
FEDOSEY EV who wanted KOVSHUKas a Deputy.
Vladimir Dmitriyevich CHELNOKOV had offered NOS ENKO the
position of Chief of the First Section, Seventh Department, pending the
reassignment of BALDIN to Germany at which time NOSENKO would
become a Deputy Chief, Seventh Department, replacing BALDIN. The
above explanation of NOSENKO seems plausible and credible and indi-
cates that GRIBANOV, the Chief of the SCD, for reasons best known tò
GRIBANOV, was assisting NOSENKO in his career in the KGB.
This section actually covers two periods in the claimed career
of NOSENKO; namely, January - July 1962 as Chief of the First Section,
and July 1962 - January 1964 as a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Depart-
ment. Since NOSENKO was in Geneva, Switzerland, from March to
June 1962, he actually cannot be seriously faulted for not having de-
tailed knowledge of the activities of the First Section during January -
July 1962. The previous
summary (pages 268 - 291) contains remarks.
in regard to the January - July 1962 period, including the period of
March - June 1962 when he was in Geneva..
Four specific tourist cases
0001219
2
PERPET
---
## Page 238
14-00000
are discussed in the previous summary: the cases of Wallace Everett
JOHNSON, William Carroll JONES, Natalie BIENSIOCK, and Horst
BRAUNS. Apparent conflicts between information from NOSENKO and
information derived from subsequent interviews with these individuals
were cited as evidence impugning NOSENKO. It is not believed that the
previous
comments concerning these cases constitute any substantial
evidence that NOSENKO did not hold the claimed position of Chief of the
First Section, Seventh Department, during January - July 1962. That
there were KGB operations against JOHNSON, JONES, BIENSTOCK and)
BRAUNS) has been confirmed through interviews by the FBI of all four
individuals.
A few additional remarks in regard to the above four cases are
warranted, not because it is considered that there are any substantial
discrepancies between what NOSENKO has said and what each individual
stated when interviewed, but because they may provide additional clari-
fication.
In the Wallace Everett JOHNSON case, it was previously noted
that JOHNSON arrived in Moscow on 31 December 1961 and that the KGB
operation against him occurred on 5 January 1962. The summary sug-
gested that the short lapse of time indicated that the homosexual tend -
encies of JOHNSON were known to the KGB prior to his arrival, contrary
to the statements of NOSENKO. NOSENKO during current in griews
3
SECRET
---
## Page 239
14-00000
has stated that the KGB learned of the homosexual tendencies of JOHNSON
"by chance" soon after his arrival, "SHMELEV" and "GRIGORIY, " two
homosexual agents of NOSENKO, were at the time operating out of a room
at the Metropol Hotel where JOHNSON stayed. They met JOHNSON there
and reported his apparent homosexual tendencies.
"In regard to the William Carroll JONES case, NOSENKO during
current interviews has furnished additional information on the KGB operation
against (JONES, including the woman Ludmila BUGAYEVA who was recruited
as an agent to work against JONES and was used in another case. The other
details furnished by NOSENKO concerning the JONES case are compatible
with his claim to having been Chief of the First Section, Seventh Department.
In regard to the Natalie BIENSTOCK case, NOSENKO did not claim
to have been the responsible case officer but was able to provide enough
specific information concerning the case to bring about a confession when
she was interviewed by the FBI. That he did not know all the details con-
cerning the BIENSTOCK case could be explained by his claim to have been
Chief of Section and not the case officer directly involved with the case.
In regard to the Horst BRAUNS) case, in the previous summary
the criticism was levied that NOSENKO did not know why BRAUNS visited
the USSR and was not able to identify any Soviet citizens whom BRAUNS)
met in the USSR. It was also stated that NOSENKO had explained that
0001221
SECRET
---
## Page 240
14-00000
(.
the Seventh Department was not concerned with foreigners visiting
relatives in the USSR nor with Soviet expatriates.. NOSENKO, accord-
ing to the previous
summary, was aware that BRAUNS was a former
Soviet citizen and the summary stated that his plan to visit relatives
was information available to the KGB through his visa application.
In regard to the statement that the Seventh Department was not
concerned with foreigners visiting relatives in the USSR nor with Soviet
expatriates, this is not in agreement with current information from
NOSENKO. " Cases of "true" tourists, whick were normally, the respon-
sibility of the Seventh Department, could become the responsibility of
another department or KGB component where Soviét relatives were
involved. However, if the case was not taken over or assigned by higher
authority to another department or
component, it was and remained the
responsibility of the Seventh Department. The fact that BRAUNS) was a
former Soviet citizen could very well have made BRAUNS of interest to
the Second Section, First Department, or a direction in the Service of
the SCD. However, in the absence of an actual reassignment by higher
authority, the case would remain the responsibility of the Seventh Depart»
ment since (BRAUNS) was visiting the Soviet Union on a tourist visa.
The
previous summary also indicated that BRAUNS listed on his visa appli-
cation that he planned to visit relatives in Leningrad. BRAUNS had a
* By 1962 there had been a large reorganization in the SCD and in the
Seventh Department. The
sitiation was not the same b0&h4795%.
SERDET
---
## Page 241
14-00000
(
relative or relatives in Leningrad. Although BRAUNS, when interviewed by
the FBI, mentioned a number' of items of which the KGB was aware concern-
ing his background and occupation from his visa application, there is no
specific reference in these interviews indicating his statement of purpose
in visiting the USSR.
Pages 282 - 286 of the previous summary reviews remarks by
NOSENKO on the Boris BELITSKIY case and states that his claimed role
in the case was not plausible. There are several specific points made in
the summary which imply that NOSENKO was lying about his knowledge of
the case. There is adequate reason to believe that NOSENKO exaggerated
his own 1962 role in that NOSENKO now states he was to give assistance
to Vladimir Lvovich ARTEMOV in the handling of BELITSKIY in Geneva
in 1962 and not to supervise ARTEMOV.
The more important aspect and the primary one is the difference in
what NOSENKO specifically reported about the BELITSKIY case and infor
mation from the actual CIA record of the case. There are major differ-
ences and without going into all the details of the case which is very involved,
an effort has been made toward determining whether these apparent differ-
ences necessarily indicate that NOSENKO was or is lying or whether there
is a possibility he is relating the actual KGB version of the case.
NOSENKO has stated that BELITSKIY was a KGB agent whom
American Intelligence recruited in London in 1960 or 1961 and that the
0001223
6
SECRET
---
## Page 242
14-00000
KGB purpose in running the operation was to lure American Intelligence
into meeting BELITSKIY inside the USSR. The previous summary stated
that NOSENKO did not know when the BELITSKIY operation started
(Brussels, Belgium, 1958), did not know the nature of the British
involvement, did not know the operational details and contact arrange -
ments BELITSKIY had with CIA, and did not know BELITSKIY's pattern
of activity in Moscow or Geneva.
NOSENKO during current interviews has indicated an awareness
that the KGB (Second Section, First Department) had been trying to use
BELITSKIY against the British. However, he still has dated the recruit-
ment of BELITSKIY as 1960-1961 in London and still states that the
primary purpose of the KGB was to involve American Intelligence in
contacts with BELITSKIY within the USSR. The latter was considered
completely inconsistent with the fact that BELITSKIY was recruited in
Brussels, Belgium, in 1958; that three letters bad been mailed to
BELITSKIY in the USSR in 1959 and early 1960; and that BELITSKIY
had an accommodation address for contact outside the USSR.
There are at this time sufficient unresolved questions in the
BELITSKIY case to preclude any conclusion that the apparent dis-
crepancies between the statements by NOSENKO on the BELITSKIY
case and the actual record are a reflection against NOSENKO
0001224
7
SECRET
---
## Page 243
the other hand, there is some reason to believe NOSENKO has
furnished the actual KGB version of the BELITSKIY case and that the
KGB, at least as of 1962, did not know the true story of the relation-
ship of BELITSKIY with CIA. There is a distinct possibility the
KGB believed the BELITSKIY recruitment occurred in 1961 in London
and BELITSKIY did not then nor ba's he since admitted to the KGB
his association with CIA actually started in 1958 in Brussels, Belgium.
As a possible reason why BELITSKIY would have told the KGB in
1961 a partial story of his contact with American Intelligence, some
at present unknown event may have occurred in 1961 which caused
BELITSKIY to believe his security was endangered and as a result
Le told the KGB of certain events in London in 1961, relating these.
events as being the original approach to BELITSKIY by CIA.
The following are certain of the points which suggest the KGB
actually considered that BELITSKIY was recruited by CIA in London
in 1961 and tbat BELITSKIY may have never told the KGB of the
developments in his case prior to 1961:
(a) BELITSKIY was in London in April 1960 at which
time he was in contact with a British citizen who was also
reporting to MI-5. This individual reported information
received from BELITSKIY which may have been a lead to
0001225
8
SECRET
---
## Page 244
14-00000
Scontai
George BLAKE. (It seems highly unlikely the KGB would
ever have directed BELITSKIY to furnish information which
may have been a lead to George BLAKE, or at least could
have caused the employees of the unit in which BLAKE was
employed from June 1959 to August 1960 to come under
suspicion as having passed information to Soviet Intelligence.)
(b) NOSENKO has stated that BELITSKIY, after he went
to Geneva in 1962, managed to reinitiate contact with CIA
rather quickly because he met a girl he had previously known
whom he was sure was an American Intelligence agent and
that she must have reported his presence in Geneva to American
Intelligence. (I the BELITSKIY case had been controlled by the
KGB from its inception in 1958, the KGB would have known of
the internal mailings to BELITSKIY and the fact that BELITSKIY
had a cover address outside the Soviet Union through which to
initiate contact. However, if BELITSKIY did not tell the KGB
anything about his contacts with CIA prior to 1961 and then
gave only a partial story of what happened in London in 1961,
BELITSKIY would not have told the KGB of the internal mail-
ings to BELIISKIY in the USSR or the fact that he long had
a cover address
outside the USSR. BELITSKIY therefore
6001228
9.
---
## Page 245
would not have told the KG3 how he actually made contact
with American Intelligence in Geneva in 1962, but very well
could have toid the KGB ie had
seen a particular woman
whom he had previously koowr, he was
sure she worked
for American Intelligence and it was through this woman
American Intelligence became aware BELITSKIY was in
Geneva. )
(c) BELITSKIY in 1962 in Geneva agreed to meat
within the USSR an individual representing CIA. ' However,
ais agreement was only under certain stipulated conditions,
the most interesting of whick was that the individual must
be unwitting of the true nature of the relationship of
BELITSKIY with CIA. In addition, any message to
BELITSKIY or any individual who met BELITSKIY must
make no reference to any previous meeting of BELITSKIY
with CIA.
The above conditions are quite explainabie if
BELITSKIY had not been under KGB control between 1958
and 1961 and in 1961 gave the KGB only a partial story o
the 1961 events in London.
6001227
10
---
## Page 246
14-00000
SECRET
As previously indicated, the conclusion is there are a sufficient
number of unresolved questions in the BELITSKIY case so that discrep-
ancies between information from NOSENKO and the actual record in the
BELITSKIY case cannot at present be considered as a reflection against
NOSENKO, and there is a distinct possibility the KGB actually did not
know the true facts of the BELITSKIY case.
The previous summary noted on page 106 that Nataliya SHULGINA
was an Intourist interpreter recruited by NOSENKO in 1955. It also
noted that NOSENKO had stated Boris BELITSKIY "reported to the KGB
that CIA had warned BELITSKIY against SHULGINA. " "
The previous
summary stated BELITSKIY reported to CIA that SHULGINA was a KGB
agent and "CIA did not warn BELITSKIY."
There appears to be no doubt at this time that the statement: by
NOSENKO that BELITSKIY reported the "CIA had warned BELITSKIY
against SHULGINA, " is a reasonably accurate description of what actually
happened in May 1962 during Agency contacts with BELITSKIY in Geneva.
The record reflects that BELITSKIY stated SHULGINA had confidentially
told him of her status as a KGB agent, stating she had been doubled by
the KGB after having been forcibly recruited by American Intelligence
while previously in Paris, France.
6001228
11
SECRET
---
## Page 247
It was determined there was no collateral information which
would indicate that the statement by SHULGINA had any factual basis
and BELITSKIY was warned SHULGINA may have been acting on behalf
of the KGB in stating to BELITSKIY she had been "forcibly recruited by
American Intelligence" at a previous date. It was also suggested to
BELITSKIY that he should go to the KGB as a loyal Soviet citizen and
report the apparent indiscretion of SHULGINA.
Pages 282 - 286 of the previous summary, in connection with
the BELITSKIY case, made reference to Vladimir Lvovich ARTEMOV.
It was stated that ARTEMOV had been involved with a series of American
tourist agents in the Soviet Union and although NOSENKO was allegedly
familiar with ARTEMOV, he was unaware of the involvement of ARTEMOV
with American tourist agents in 1958 - 1959. The summary noted this
was during a period when NOSENKO claimed to have been Deputy Chief
of the American-British Commonwealth Section of the Seventh Depart-
ment. Although not specifically stated, the above suggested ARTEMOV
was
actually in the Seventh Department in 1958 - 1959 and that NOSENKO
not even aware ARTEMOV was in the Seventh Department. NOSENKO
has consistently stated that ARTEMOV was assigned to the First Section,
First Department, from the time he entered into the KGB in approxi-
mately 1957.
0001229
SECRET
---
## Page 248
A closer
examination of the cases described in the previous
summary as "CIA American tourist agents," reveals there is no con-
flict in the involvement of ARTEMOV in these cases and the statement
by NOSENKO that ARTEMOV was with the First Section, First Depart-
ment. As an example, one of the cases is the case of Edward McGOWAN.
NOSENKO has furnished information concerning this case, stating it was
originally a Seventh Department case and that after the mailing of a letter
by the individual in Minsk, the case was immediately taken over by the
First Department. There is adequate reason to believe ARTEMOV only
became involved after the case was transferred to the First Department.
Another of the cases involved the contact of ARTEMOV with a CIA)
officer
and visited the USSR on a tourist visa.
Such an individual would under
no circumstances be considered a true tourist or the responsibility of
the Seventh Department, particularly since apparently the individual was
even traveling under a diplomatic passport. It is assumed the individual
was of interest to the First Chief Directorate and if the First Chief
Directorate required or desired support from the SCD, it would normally
request the First Department for such assistance and it is extremely un-
likely that the FCD would request the Seventh Department for assistance
in a case involving an American diplomat.
0001230
13
SECRET
---
## Page 249
Pages 332 - 333 of the previous summary contain the basis
for the previous conclusion that the claim of NOSENKO that he was a
Deputy Chief of the Seventa Department from July 1962 to January
1963 was not credible. It is considered that a detailed rebuttal is
not necessary since this conclusion was apparently based on inadequate
information. During current interviews, NOSENKO has furnished
details concerning his duties and other aspects of his claimed position
which substantiate his claim to having been a Deputy Chief of the
Seventh Department from July 1962 to January 1964.
An example in support of the statement that the previous conclu-
sion was based on inadequate information is the matter of the written
notes which NOSENKO brought out and furnished to CIA in early 1964.
The description of these notes on page 319 of the previous summary is
inadequate, inaccurate, and misleading. Prior to current interviews,
an cffort had not been made to obtain from NOSENKO a detailed explan
ation of his notes or of how be obtained the information in the notes.
During current interviews, NOSENKO has given detailed informa-
tion concerning all aspects of his notes. This information supports his
claimed position of Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department and includes
collateral support to his claim of being Deputy Chief of the First Section,
First Department, iz 1960 - 1961.
C001231
14
SECRET
---
## Page 250
14-00000
Primarily the notes of NOSENKO can be categorized as
follows:
(a). Short case summaries by the Chiefs of the
First Section, Second Section and Sixth Section, Seventh
Department. NOSENKO has stated that he was in 1962 -
1963 responsible for supervision over these Sections and
that Filip Denisovich BOBKOV, Deputy Chief, SCD, who
supervised the Seventh Department, requested a list of all
recruited agents of the Seventh Department. According to
NOSENKO, the order from BOBKOV was to only retain the
files (cases) of agents in tourist firms and that the files of
other
recruited agents should be sent to the FCD or Archives.
NOSENKO has
stated that he in turn levied on the Chiefs of
the three Sections the requirement of BOBKOV, but also ex-
panded the request to include all 1960 - 1962 cases, not
excluding previous cases or cases which had already been
given to the FCD. The notes of NOSENKO included hand-
written reports from the Chief or Acting Chief of each Section
on recruited agents, with information varying from agent to
agent and even including some human errors.
Many of the above cases had previously been trans-
ferred to the FCD, but the remarks of NOSENKO about thef001232
15
SECRET
and i it inca
---
## Page 251
inclusion support his statement that he had expanded
the original request from BOBKOV so that he would have
some "pieces of information to give CIA. "
(b) Notes by NOSENKO on other cases which he learned
of during the 1962 - 1963 period. Certain of the notes were
made from a review of a notebook kept by the Chief, Seventh
Department, to which NOSENKO had access on at least two
occasions. Most of his notes were not detailed but were
sufficient to refresh the memory of NOSENKO at a later
date and yet were somewhat innocuous to maintain before
his defection.
(c) Notes for lectures to officers of the Seventh Directorate
prepared while with the First Department, 1960 - 1961, and
the Seventh Department, 1962 - 1963.
(d; Draft report for the briefing of the new Chief, First
Department, in the latter part of 1961.
(e) One of three copies of an unregistered report pre-
pared by the Chief, Seventh Department, and two Deputy Chiefs,
including NOSENKO. This was a briefing paper for use by the
Chief (CHELNOKOV) in an appearance before the Collegium
of the KGB which was reviewing the activities of the Seventh
16
SECRET
0001233
---
## Page 252
SECRET
Department. According to NOSENKO, the prepared
report was never typed as a formal document.
The view has been set forth that NOSENKO took undue risk in
carrying written notes with him out of the Soviet Union. An examination
of this material suggests that NOSENKO was using extreme care in
collecting material and was not attempting to obtain documents, the
possession of which might be incriminating or which if he had brought
out would have been immediately missed. Instead, he collected a con-
siderable amount of valuable information which he could bring out with
little or no fear that a search of his effects in the KGB after his depart-
ure for Geneva would disclose that certain material was missing. None
of the material was registered and all could have previously been des-
troyed by NOSENKO.
The previous summary stated that NOSENKO brought three KGB
documents to Geneva. These were typed papers but none was registered
or actually accountable. The reference to three documents was to:
(a) The draft report for the briefing of the Collegium
which has been mentioned previously.
(b) A typed two-page report on several cases. Actually
a Chief of Section had typed his notes on cases instead of
submitting in handwriting as the others did.
0001234
17
SECRET
---
## Page 253
(c) A second copy of a summary on a KGB agent.
NOSENKO stated that there were two copies in the file
kept by the Chief which he reviewed and that he kept one.
Of interest is the fact that the copy was not a registered
document and did not contain the usual information as to
number of copies typed.
0001235
18
SECRET
---
## Page 254
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 255
14-00000
SECRET
G.
NOSENKO HAS NO VALID CLAIM TO CERTAINTY THAT
THE KGB RECRUITED NO AMERICAN EMBASSY
PERSONNEL BETWEEN 1953 AND HIS DEFECTION IN 1964
0001236
SECRET
0R0UP 1
Excleded tom zulematic
damaradag acd
dastassirigation
---
## Page 256
14-00000
(
G. NOSENKO has no valid claim to certainty that the KGB
recruited no American Embassy personnel between 1953 and kis
defection in 1964. (Previous conclusion)
The conclusion in this summary is that NOSENKO is of the
opinion that there were no KGB recruitments of United States Embassy
personnel in Moscow between 1953 and December 1963 with the exception
of "'ANDREY" (Dayle Wallis SMITH) and Herbert'HOWARD; who actually
was a USIA) employee but did work part of the time in the Embassy.
The question here is whether or not the expressed opinion of
NOSENKO is sufficiently based on actual knowledge so that this opinion
can be accepted as absolute evidence that there were no other KGB
recruitments of Embassy personnel during this period of time. The
only logical conclusion is that the opinion of NOSENKO cannot be
accepted as absolute fact and,
therefore, there is a possibility that
a recruitment could bave occurred and NOSENKO not be aware in any
way of the recruitment. This should in no way be interpreted as
suggestion that NOSENKO could be lying, but rather that an unbiased
observer without personal knowledge could and should be hesitant to
accept the expressed opinion of NOSENKO in this particular area.
actual basis for the stated opinion of NOSENKO
100120
examined and can be cited as follows.
SECRET
66O67 1
1 Excluded irera automatic
conagrading and
écelescificallen
---
## Page 257
(a) During March 1953-late May 1955 NOSENKO
was a case officer in the First Section, First Department,
SCD. NOSENKO does not claim that he would have known
the details concerning any recruitments (other than
"ANDREY") in this period, but states if there had been
he would have heard "something."
(b) During late May 1955 to December 1959 NOSENKO
was in the Seventh Department, not the First Department,
but continued to have contact with certain officers in the
First Section, First Department. NOSENKO is of the
opinion that if there had been a recruitment in the United
States Embassy during this period he would have heard
"something" even though he would probably have learned
few details.
(c) During the January 1960-December 1961 period
NOSENKO was Deputy Chief of the First Section, First
Department, and he has made the categorical statement
that there were no recruitments by the KGB of United
States Embassy personnel during this period of time.
He has also stated that if there had been any recruitments
during the 1953-1959 period he is sure he would, during
1960-1961, have heard or learned some details of tp0) 01230
case
or cases. There is merit to this contention by
---
## Page 258
'at ere to to stone da
NOSENKO since the Chief of Section was Vladislav
KOVSHUK who had been an officer of the First Depart-
ment since 1953, actually working in the First Section
except for the periods of time that he was in the United
States to reactivate "ANDREY" in 1957-1958 and a
period of time that he was Deputy Chief of the First
Department
(d) During 1962-1963 NOSENKO was again in the
Seventh Department. However, he continued to maintain
contact with certain officers of the First Section, First
Department: in particular, Gennadiy I. GRYAZNOV,
who succeeded NOSENKO as Deputy Chief of the First.
Sectión, then became Chief of Section, and in the latter
part of 1963 became a Deputy Chief of the First Department.
According to NOSENKO his relationship with
GRYAZNOV was sufficiently close during 1962-1963 that
he is sure GRYAZNOV would have furnished NOSENKO
some information in regard to any successful recruitments
of United States Embassy personnel. NOSENKO pointed
out that he learned of the existence of the Herbert HOWARD
case from GRYAZNOV in 1962, although it was not until
1963 that NOSENKO beard the name. NOSENKO actually
0001239
3
SECRET
---
## Page 259
SECRET
learned of the name when the Flest Section, Firat
Department, needed the services of the Seventh
Department (Third Section) in obtaining a rooms in a
certain hotel for the Soviet girl friend of HOWARD.
In goneral the above constitates the baats for the stated opinion
Of NOSENKO that "ANDREY" and Hesbert HOWARD were the only
succeseial KGB recraltments during 1953 - December 1963. It should
be soted that there are no other identifled KGB recrultments during
this period of time which would specifically refate the oplaion of
NOSENKO. However, ba viow of the cited actual basta for the opialon
of NOSENKO, acceptance of the opinion of NOSENKO as being an
honest opinion should not be converted into a statement that it la
absolute proof that another recruitment could not have occurred.
NOSENKO may be completely correct in his opinion, but since
NOSENKO was only in the First Department 1953 - 1955 and 1960 - 1961
his opinion that he would have heard "something" about a recrultment
1= 1953 - 1959 or 1962 - 1963 cannot be accepted as infallible.
0001240
SEGRET
---
## Page 260
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 261
SECRET
v.
ANNEX
0001241
CACA
Excladed frant automat!
down raring cod
SECRET
---
## Page 262
14-00000
ANNEX
The previous summary contained an Annex "A" and an Arnex
"B" covering pages 316 - 435. Limited comments concerning Annex
"A, " Statements of Soviet Officials About NOSENKO, and Annex "B, "
Summaries of Cases Not Examined in Text, are attached. In addition,
there is an Annex "C" to this summary which is entitled, "The
Cherepanov Papers. "
Attachments:
Annex A
Annex B
Annex C
SECRET
Excused Mera cutorale
0001242
---
## Page 263
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 264
14-00000
SECRET
ANNEX B - SUMMARIES OF CASES NOT
EXAMINED IN TEXT
SECRET
6001243
Exclude i
DH002237 SoJ
---
## Page 265
ANNEX B
SUMMARIES OF CASES NOT EXAMINED IN TEXT
Pages 399 - 435 of the previous
summary contain summaries
on the cases
of 49 Americans who, according to information from
NOSENKO, were of KGB interest, were approached by the KGB, or
were actually recruited by the KGB. It was stated that these cases
did not clearly relate to the specific KCB positions held at particular
times by NOSENKO and thus could not be usefully employed in examining
his claimed KGB service. The sourcing of these cases has been explored
in detail during the current interviews with NOSENKO, and it is now
possible to establish a certain relationship between these cases and
certain claimed positions of NOSENKO in the KGB.
It is the conclusion of this summary that any group of 49) cases,
as well as all other cases concerning which NOSENKO has furnished
information, must be fully considered, not necessarily for the importance
or unimportance of the information, but to determine how NOSENKO
claimed to have learned of the case and whether his statemenis con-
cerning each identified case are supported by collateral information.
These factors are important in assessing the overall validity of info=-
mation from NOSENKO as well as being supporting evladlidis
claimed positions in the KGB.
¡ Lichbas died saamatics
carting aid
---
## Page 266
14-00000
!
To comment specifically on each of the 49 cases would require
a very lengthy paper. Current interviews have developed pertinent
additional information from NOSENKO in approximately 40 of the 49)
cases. Of even more significance is the fact that NOSENKO has
logically sourced his irformation in all except perhaps four cases.
The indicated inability of NOSENKO to completely source all 49 of
the cases is not considered significant, pasticularly since his having
knowledge of all the cases is quite compatible with his claimad positions
in the KGB. In addition, criticism of NOSENKO for not being able to
source all of his information would be unreasonable since it makes
no allowance for normal lapses of memory or failure to recali some-
thing which was insignificant at the time it occurred.
Without citing in detail any of the 49) cases, the ways in which
NOSENKO learned of a number of the cases are considered important
since there is a direct relationship to his claimed positions in the KGB
during 1960 - January 1964, specifically the position of Deputy Chief,
First Section, First Department, 1960 - 1961; Chief, First Section,
Seventh Depariment, January - July 1962; and as Deputy Chief, Seventh
Department, July 1962 - Januazy 1964. Certain examples of the above
are
as follows:
0001245
SECRET
---
## Page 267
14-00000
(a) NOSENKO learned of a number of the Seventa
Department cases which had occurred in 1960 - 1961, as
well as several 1958 - 1959 cases from notes prepared by
the Chief or Acting Chief of the First Section, Second
Section and Sixth Section in 1963. These notes were pre-
pared at the request of NOSENKO who as a Deputy Chief,
Seventh Department, was responsible for supervision of
these three sections; and the request was actually an ex-
pansion of the original request from BOBKOV, Deputy Chief
of the SCD, for information on recruitments of the Seventh
Department. NOSENKO brought with him in 1964 the notes
prepared by the Chief or Acting Chief of the First Section,
Second Section and Sixth Section and his knowledge of mary
of the cases which had occurred prior to 1962, particularly
1960 - 1961, was limited to information contained in the
notes. From these notes, NOSENKO had prepared his re-
port tO BOBKOV eliminating those which were not applicable
to the request.
(0) NOSENKO learned of several 1962 - 1963 cases of
the First Section, First Department,
from Gennadiy I.
GRYAZNOV who succeeded NOSENKO as Deputy Chief,
6001246
3
SEORET
---
## Page 268
14-00000
First Section, First Department. This information was
furnished to NOSENKO primarily because of bis friendship
with GRYAZNOV and not as the result of mutual operations.
However, NOSENKO learned of certain oi the cases or
was furnished additional details as a result of a request
from the Seventh Department to the First Section, First
Department, for assistance or vice versa.
Certain of the 49 cases listed were cases of the Seventh Depart-
ment prior to 1960 or in 1962 - 1963 waen NOSENKO was in the Seventh
Department. Certain of the cases were cases in which the First Section,
First Department, was involved prior to 1960 or 1960 - 1961. The
knowledge of NOSENKO concerning these two groups of cases does not
materially support his claimed positions in the First Department and
Seventh Department, but does support his claimed assignment to the
Seventh Department prior to 1960 and in 1962 - 1963, and kis claimed
assignment to the First Department in 1960 - 1961.
It is difficult to specifically comment concerning these 49ì cases
since they do not fall into one or two specific categories. Instead, they
constitute a rather motley group of cases remaining after completion of
the detailed sections of the previous summary. Included are Fiist
Department and Seventh Department cases covering a period of appioxi-
mately five and one-half years.
It should be noted, no?tor? fat the
---
## Page 269
(
explanation of NOSENKO concerning ais knowiedge oi tel 49) cases
is both plausible and compatible with his claimed positions in tee
First Departnent and Seventh Department during 1960 - Januacy 1964.
0001248
5
---
## Page 270
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 271
SECRET
ANNEX C - THE CHEREPANOV PAPERS
0001249
SECRET
Excluded in carmala
22221 pota
---
## Page 272
SECRET
ANNEX C
THE CHER EPANOV PAPERS
Pages
309 - 316 of the previous summary contain a description
of the Cherepanov Papers,
and how Aleksandr Nikolayevich CHEREPANOV
passed a package oí documents to an American tourist in Moscow in early
November 1963. The conclusion, however, was that the assertions of
NOSENKO with respect to the CHEREPANOV case were not material to
the claim of NOSENKO that he was Deputy Chief, Seventh Department,
in late 1963.
The definite relationship of the Cherepanov Papers to the bona
fides of NOSENKO cannot be ignored and must be given specific consi
eration. I CHEREPANOV was under KGB control when he passed the
papers to the American tourist, or if the papers contain "deception
information, " the bona fides of NOSENKO are subject to very serious
question.
NOSENKO had personal knowledge of CHEREPANOV who was,
according to NOSENKO, an officer in the First Section, First Depaitment,
SECRET
0001250
colded ten strato
---
## Page 273
during 1960 - mid-1961 when he was forced into retirement from the
KGB. During the above period of time, NOSENKO claims to bave
been Deputy Chief, First Section,
although he does not claim to have
had a direct supervisory responsibility over CHEREPANOV except
in the absence of the Chief of Section, Vladislav KOVSHUK. NOSENKO
also claims to have participated in the hunt for CHEREPANOV in
December 1963.
Consideration has previously been given to the theory that the
Cherepanov Papers were passed to Americans by the KGB through
CHEREPANOV to support the bona fides of NOSENKO. Tais ibeory
seems to have little credibility since toe papers contain no information
which would even support the claim of NOSENKO that he was in the
First Section, First Department, 1960 - 1961. The papers also contain
no information which would indicate there was even a Deputy Chief of
the First Section during 1958 - 1960.
Statements by NOSENKO are emphatic that CHEREPANOV was
not under KGB control, that be passed the papers which it later developed
he had taken from the First Section prior to his retirement because be
was disgruntled with his treatment by the KGB, and that the action by
CHEREPANOV caused consternation in the KGB.
There is no collateral evidence which contradicts any of
the statements by NOSENKO about CHEREPANOV. Further, there is
0001251
SECRET
---
## Page 274
To one i t
noting in either the form or substance of the papers which provides
a basis for suspicion as to their aubenticity. In addition, the form
and substance of the papers aie in keeping with the description by
NOSENKO of the day-to-day operation of the First Section, First
Department.
During current interviews, the CHEREPANOV case has been
covered in detail with NOSENKO.. The Cherepanov Papers, waich
were originally shown to NOSENKO in 1964 after his defection, have
also been covered in detail on a separate item-by-item basis. Although
NOSENKO does not claim to have specifically seen any particular item
prior to 1964, his statements in regard to the various handwritings,
types of notes, and drait memoranda leave no doubt that NOSENKO
was very familiar with personnel in the First Section, First Depart-
ment, and with First Department procedures.
Certain additional research has been conducted in regard to the
papers and a detailed analysis will be prepared at a later date. It
should be noted that a considerable amount of personal judgmen ras
been necessary in making an assessment of the Cherepanov Papers
since there are no exemplars with which to compare any of the material.
However, based on information developed thus fai,
and there is no
reason to believe additional work will alter the conclusion, there is
not an adequate basis for an opinion that CHEREPANOV was under KGB
control, thai the Cherepanor Papers contain "deceptive inúpriu 252"
3
---
## Page 275
14-00000
or that the papers were other than the collection of material by a
disgruntled employee which he very carefully selected or accumulated,
toe removal of which would only bave constituted a minimal risk to
CHEREPANOV.
The entire Cherepanov Papers have been reviewed to determine
if there is any information which could be considered "deceptive infor-
mation" either by direct statement or implication. Two possible areas
have been noted and given full considerati
(a) There is no specific infd
were any recruitments by the KGB
sonnel in the United States Embas;
nor is there any information sugge
1253
coded 08, stand
be.
Piratect
American source 01 American age
during that period of time.
(b) PetI S. POPOV, a GRU
get ok
an extremely valuable CIA source from 1953 on, was,
according to the papers, exposed to the KGB in January
1959 as a result of a letter mailing by George Payne
WINTERS, JI. WINTERS was a CIA employee under
passigned to the Embassy in
Moscow. The letter, which was to POPOV, was obtained
by the KGB after mailing by WINTERS and was a direci
result of KGB surveillance of WINTERS.
0001253
---
## Page 276
In regard to (a), the papers
are only a rather minute part of
the total papers prepared in the First Section during 1958 - 1960.
The lack of any information in these papers which directly or indirectly
indicates that the KGB made a recruitment of an American in the
Embassy or had an American source in the Embassy during the 1958 -
1960 period is only a matter for consideration. It is not conclusive
proof that a recruitment was not made or that an American source.
did not exist.
The papers do not contain a positive statement on
either matter.
In regard to (b), the quite specific information in the papers
that Petr S. POPOV was uncovered by the KCB as a result of KGB
surveillance on George Payne WINTERS, JI., who mailed a letter to
POPOV. in January 1959, this information should be considered as
possibly information of a deceptive nature unless an adequate explanation
can be made for its presence in the papers. POPOV was recalled to
Moscow from East Germany in November 1958 ostensibly for TDY.
The circumstances under which be was recalled and collateral infor -
mation have given adequate grounds for a belief that by November
1958 POPOV was suspected by the KGB of cooperating with Western
Intelligence or that the KGB may even have been sure POPOV had
been cooperating with United States Intelligence.
It may be presumed that any lead to tae KGB in regard io
POPOV or the fact that United Siates Intelligence, more spe 6001254
5
---
## Page 277
14-00000
CIA, had a source in the GRU would have come from an agent or
source of the FCD, KGB, not the SCD. It can also be presumed that
a source or agent of the ECD in a position to furnish a lead to a
penetration of the GRU by Western Intelligence would be carefully
proiected even within the KGB. The possibility of course exists that
a lead from George BLAKE, an FCD agent, resulted in toe exposure
of POPOV to the KGB, but it is not established that it did nor is there
any reason to believe the FCD could not or did not have another agent
or agents who furnished information to the KGB pertinent to develop-
ment of the case against POPOV.
The primary question, however, as regards the Cherepanov
Papers is whether, even if it is presumed the KGB obtained information
from an FCD source or agent which led to suspicion of POPOV or
identification of POPOV, this would be incompatible with information
in the papers and could only lead to the conclusion that the papers contain
"deceptive information."
The conclusion in regard to the above is that the faci the papers
attribute the exposure of POPOV to the KGB to surveillance on WINTERS
when he mailed the letter to POPOV in January 1959 is not incompatible
with the distinct possibility that the KGB had previously obtained infor-
mation from an ECD agent oi agents which actually led to suspicion in
regard to POPOV or actual identification of POPOV.
0001255
SECRET
---
## Page 278
It information was received from an important ECD agent
such as George BLAKE or through another valuable FCD agent which
led to KGB suspicion of POPOV priot to bis return to Moscow in
November 1958, it is highly unlikely such information would receive
wide distribution within the KGB, either in the FCD or the SCD. It
is also possible the limited group within the KGB who would be aware
that the KGB had received information leading to suspicion of POPOV
from a valuable agent would be very interested in attributing the
exposure of POPOV to the fortuitous mailing of the letter to POPOV
by WINTERS. The possibility should be considered that prior to the
retrieval by the KGB of the letter to POPOV there was only a deep
suspicion of POPOV but that the letter completely solidified the case
against POPOV.
Consideration has been given to the possibility that CHERZPANOV
was under KGB control when he passed the papers to the American
tourist and that it was done by the KGB with the hope of involving CIA
in a KGB-controlled operation within the USSR. In that event, the
papers passed by CHEREPANOV would most likely be genuine since
this would have been the initial step in what the KGB hoped would become
successful operation.,
The above theory has been rejected since there
are a number
of factors which militate against it. These factors include the fact that
0001256
---
## Page 279
ine latest irformation in the papers was at least three years old,
which world indicate CHEREPANOV had no current access and there
was no indication CHEREPANCV Was interested in a future contact.
0001257
8
SCAPE
---
## Page 280
*No text recognized on this page.*
---
## Page 281
td-innod
SECRET
INDEX
ABIDIAN, John - IV, E, 5, 7-15,19,20, 52
"ANDREY" (Dayle Wallis SMITH) - IV, G, 1-4
ARTAMONOV, Nikolay - III, A, 2
ARTEMOV, Vladimir Lvovich - IV, F, 6, 12, 13
BAKHVALOV, Mikbail - IV, E, 3, 4
BALDIN, Boris Andreyevich - IV,F, 2
BARRETT, Robert - II, F, 14, 15
BEGGS, Frank) - IV, E, 36,37
BELITSKIY, Boris - IV, F, 6-12
BERIYA, Lavrentiy Ivanovich - IV, B, 2,3,5-7
BIENSTOCK, Natalie) - IV, F, 3, 4
(BIRSE, Arthuy - IV, D, 1,2
BLAKE, George - IV, D, 9; IV, F, 9; V, C, 6,7
BOBKOV, Filip Denisovich - IV, F, 15,16; V, B, 3
BOHLEN, Ambassador - II, F, 10
BOWDEN, Lewis - IV, E, 53, 54
BRAUNS, Horst)- IV, F, 3-6
BROWN, G. Stanley, - IV, E, 43
6001259
•. .
SECRE:
CRobe 1
Excledea trea zutamalic
daer recing aad
Gecirclticaina
---
## Page 282
BUGAYEVA, Ludmila - IV, F, 1
BURGI, Richard - IV, D, 1
BURTIN, Sipe - IV, E, 49,50
BURTIN, Will) - IV, E, 49, 50
CECCHI, Pietro - IV, E, 39, 40, 42
CHELNOKOV, Vladimir Dmitriyevich - IV, F, 2,16
CHEREPANOV, Aleksandr N. - III, H, 4; V, C, 1-4,6-8
CHERNETSEV, Y. E. - IV, E, 49
CHURANOV, Vladimir A. - II, B, 4
DAY, Frank - IV, E, 41,43
DEMKIN, Vladimir - IV, E, 20, 45
DERYABIN, Petr Sergeyevich - IV, B, 5,6
DOUGLAS, William O. - IV, D, 3
DREW, George - IV, D, 1
DWELLY, Robert - IV, E, 41, 44, 45
FARMAKOVSKAYA, Olga A. - V,A, 1
FEDOROVICH, Tatyana - IV, E, 8,9
FEDOSEYEV, Sergey M. - IV, E, 49-51; IV, F, 1
(FISK, Norman - IV, D, 5
FRIPPEL, Arsene) - IV, D, 2
(GAFFEY, Joseph) - IV, E, 41, 45, 46
2
0001259
---
## Page 283
SECRET
GARBLER, Paul - IV, E, 52
(GARCIA, Anthony A. - IV, E, 39
GARLAND, John - III, F, 17; IV, E, 31, 33-36
(GINSBURG, Michael - IV, D, 5, 6
GOLITSYN, Anatoliy Mikhaylovich - II, B, 3, 4; III, E, 9-11; III, F, 5-13, 15-19;
IV, B, 5,6; IV, D,9,10; IV, E, 21,23, 31-34;
V, A, 1
GRIBANOV, Oleg M. - II, F, 3,4; IV, 6; IV, 6; IV, E, 4,5,21; IV, E, 1,2
"GRIGORIY" - III, F, 13; IV, D, 3,6; IV,F, 4
GROMAKOVSKIY, Yevgeniy - III, B, 4; IV, E, 20
GRYAZNOV, Gennadiy I. - III, B, 4;
II, F, 8-13,15; IV, E, 5,12, 19-21, 26-28,
30,43-45; IV, G,3; V,B, 3,4
GUK, Yuriy I. - II, B, 4
HAMILTON, Victor Norris - III, E, 9
(aka: HINDAL, Fouzi Mitri)
"HANNA" - IV, E, 27
HARRIS, Gisella - IV, D, 1, 7, 8
HORBALY, William - IV, E, 53
HOWARD, Herbert) - III, E, 8; II, F, 20; IV, G, 1,3,4
IVANOVA, Svetlana - IV, E, 38, 39, 45, 46
'JENNER, Paul) - IV, E, 28-31, 35-36
JOHNSON, Robert Lee - III, E, 8; III, G, 5
(JOHNSON, Wallace Everett) - IV, F, 3,4
JONES, William Carroll'-IV,F, 3,4'
0001280
3
SECRET
---
## Page 284
cd-idonor
SECRET
KADERA, Fred - IV, E, 45
KANTOR, Marvin - IV, D, 5, 6
(KARLOV, fnu' - IV, D,5
KASHPEROV, Mikhail - II, H, 4
KENMER, Myra - IV, E, 9
KEYSERS, James - IV, E, 22-26, 55, 56:
KLYPIN, Vladimir Alekseyevich - IV, E, 5, 48-51
KOBULOV, Bogdan Zakharovich (General) - IV, B, 1-4,7
KOLOSSOV, Viktor - IV, E, 30, 34
(Alias used by KOSOLAPOV)
KOSOLAPOV, Vadim V. - III, B, 4; II, F, 8, 16, 17; IV, E, 5, 19-21, 28-32,
34-39,42-44
KOSYGINA, Madame - III, A, 1
KOVSHUK, Vladislav M. - II,B, 4; Ш,Е,5,11, 12; IV, E, 3, 4, 6, 12, 18, 21,
23,49,52,53; IV, F, 1,2; IV, G, 3; V, C,2
KOZLOV, Veniamin - IV, E, 12
KRUGLOV, Sergey Nikiforovich - IV, B, 5
LANE, Allen) - IV, D, 1, 2
LANGELLE, Russell - II, F, 3; IV, E, 8
"LILLIAN" - IV, E, 26
(LUBIN, George) - IV, E, 49,50
LUNI, Horace) - III, E, 3
MAHONEY, Eugene - IV, E, 53
0001261
MALIA, Martin) - IV, D, 2
4
SEORET
---
## Page 285
SECRET
MARK, David - III, C, 4
MATLAW, Ralph - IV, D, 5
MERTENS, Gerard - IV, D, 2
MIKHAYLOV, A. A, - IV, E, 49
MINIKENBAUGH, James Allen - ILI, E, 8; II, G, 5
MORELL, William N. - IV, E, 52
MORONE, Joseph' - IV, E, 22, 27, 36, 37,39, 40, 55
MULE, Walter (Capt.) - IV, C, 4
(MC GOWAN, Edward) - IV, F, 13
PECHTER, Bernard - IV, D, 5,6
PENKOVSKIY, Oleg Vasilyevich - IV, E, 13
PETROV, Vladimir Ivanovich - III, B, 4; IV, E, 48, 49
POPOV, Petr S. - IV, E, 7, 10; V, C/4-7
PREISFREUND, Johan) - III, F, 5, 11, 12
PRESSMAN, Patrick - IV, D, 5,7
"RAKETA" - IV, C, 5
RASTVOROV, Yuriy - IV, B, 5, 6
RHODES, Roy - III, E, 4
RUFE, John - IV, D, 5,6
SCHWARZENBACH, Collette - III, F, 10
5
SECRET
0001262
---
## Page 286
SERGEYEV (SERGEEV), FNU - IV, E, 32, 33
(Very possibly Igor Alekseyevich ZENKIN, but is now considered also
identical to Igor Alekseyevich SERGEYEV, Igor Alekseyevich SUKHOV
and very possibly Igor A. SMIRNOV.)
(SHAPIRO, Isaac Henry - III, F, 6
SHATTAUER, Sofia - IV, D, 5,7
SHAZLY, Sarwat el - IV, E, 40
SHELEPIN, Aleksandr Nikolayevich - II, F, 13
"SHMELEY" - II, F, 13; IV, D, 3, 6; IV, F, 4
SHUBIN, Jobn - IV, D, IL =
SHULGINA, Nataliya - IV, F, l1, 12
SMITH, Dayle Wallis - II, F, 4, 20; IV, G, 1
SMITH, Edward Ellis - III, F, 4
SMITH, John Discoe' - ILI, E, 9; IV, E, 49, 50
STALIN - IV, B, 5
STEVENS, Edmund - II, F, 4,6
'STORSBERG, James - III, F, 3,5,11-13; IV, E, 21-24, 26, 43, 55, 56
TARASKA, William - IV, D, 5, 6
TAYLOR, David - IV, D, 2
TAYLOR, John - IV, E, 42, 43
UMANETS, Ella - IV, E, 38
6001262
6
SECREI
---
## Page 287
SEO.21
(URBAN, (Colonel); - IV, E, 24, 25
VASSALL, William - III, E, 9; IL, G, 5; IV, D, 9
WASHENKO, Steve - IV, Ei, 53
WILBY, William Stanley - IV, D, 2
WINTERS, George Payne, Jr. - IV, E,, 53; V, C, 4-7
ZENKIN, FNU - IV, E, 32-34
(Very possibly Igor Alekseyevich ZENKIN, but is now considered also
identical to Igor Alekseyevich SERGEYEV, Igor Alekseyevich SUKHOV
and very possibly Igor A. SMIRNOV.)
ZUJUS, Matthew) - IV, E, 26-28
ZWANG, Maurice - IV, E, 40-42
7
0001264
SECRET
--- |
2,018 | /releases/2018 | 104-10167-10405.pdf | 104-10167-10405 | 04/26/2018 | Redact | CIA | 09/15/1966 | PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT | 80T01357A | DIRECTOR | CABLE RE TRANSFER OF ITEMS (EXPLOSIVES). | 1 | CIA | JFK | 3/12/18 | JFK64-6 : F14 : 1998.02.05.17:30:46:373031 : | 1 | ## Page 1
104-10167-10405
RETURN TO CIAY
Background Use Ohly
Do Not Reproduce
CLISSIFAED MISSACE
SECRET
PERSON/UNIS NOTIFIEO
cies
te
FEPECDUCTION PROMENAR
MO-
RES. TO ERANCH O
DISTaOr Ds16.
ACTIGH
SIStEN BY 30/2
Just p
& RID COPY
FILE, VI LOGS 4, SUDG, WH8,
ADVANCE CODY
S= 02 F T 1525222 CITE JUAVE 3344
DIRECTOR
I"FO JMEAS
TYPiC INCEDRICK
REF: DIRECIOR 34535
pesget
1. LOCAL LIYAPA STAIES TRANSFER OF REF ITEMS
(EXCEPI GRENADES--ALL EXPLOSIVES ALREADY DISPOSED OF).
CAN BE ARRANGED BY SHAVE ZEMO TO LOCAL LNYAPA•
2. HOVEVEP LYYAPA CANSO! PELEASE UNTIL EARLY
OCTOBEP., WHEN MATERIAL WILL 3E FOPFEITED TO G.S. GOVI
IN ABSENCE PETITION FROY INDIVIDUALS FROM WHOM IT WAS
SEIZED.
3. HILL ADVISE WHEN MATEFIAL ACQUIRED.
SECRET
96922
SECRET
03
a copy of this menage to acto
requived
--- |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.