year
int64
2.02k
2.03k
path
stringclasses
8 values
file_name
stringlengths
16
57
record_number
stringlengths
15
423
nara_release_date
stringclasses
21 values
formerly_withheld
stringclasses
14 values
agency
stringclasses
30 values
document_date
stringlengths
0
19
document_type
stringclasses
93 values
file_number
stringlengths
0
383
to_name
stringlengths
0
47
from_name
stringlengths
0
60
title
stringlengths
0
246
number_of_pages
int64
0
51.9k
originator
stringclasses
140 values
record_series
stringclasses
301 values
review_date
stringclasses
404 values
comments
stringlengths
0
219
pages_released
int64
1
51.9k
content
stringlengths
31
5.75M
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32293692-1.pdf
124-10211-10468
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
10/20/1959
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CR SEE TITLE
DIRECTOR, FBI
SAC, NY
CR 134-8502-3
12
FBI
HQ
02/24/2018
INC MEMO
12
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 5/26/201 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER : 124-10211-10468 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : CR SEE TITLE Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: SAC, NY TO: DIRECTOR, FBI TITLE: [Restricted] DATE: 10/20/1959 PAGES: 12 SUBJECTS : DLH, ASSOC, RES, EMP, SOVIETS DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Secret RESTRICTIONS: 1B; 1C; 4 CURRENT STATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 01/13/1999 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS: INC MEMO v9.1 13 --- ## Page 2 SEC New Yor: EX 109 Director, TBI •Ar. rapich 034-126 0390381. Shubatt 8654-8502) - 3 REC- 18 '12-10-59 ANNETTE SYLVIA EPSTEIN, ala. Annette Eberly 721130 Classi Beciassity on 3/37/85- Reurses 10-20-59. (A(4) Bufiles contain no information identifiable wich coptioned 1001vi010 under the name of Annette Eberly •(A)(U) NrS. Jane Roman, CIA, advised on 11-4-59 that CIA has no information concerning the subject and that CIA has no interest in the subject. ALL. (OFOAZATION CONTANED naranows 4076613h WFS : hr (5) 3-20-96 CLASSIFIED BY/ 5668 5L2/KSR DECLASSIFY ON: 25X (OFK) Epstein being considered by NYD for development as PS1. NY requested BU determine if CIA has info or interest as subject, during 1956 and 1957, attended University of strasbourgh, (4)C set sore alone to sa France. Mrs. Roman, CIA, furnished J. Papich 11-4-59.(8 ) CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIICASION AND/OR, RELEASE OF SIF. FORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. MKH 2-6-98. DECLASSIFIED BY 5668 5C0/BC 08 3 - 10-98 (JFK. MAILEP, 20, NÖV 1 0 1959 COMM-FOI | (4) (a) i. do Tolson Belmont Mohr Nease Parsons Rosen Tamm Trotter W.C. Sullivan _ ¡Tele. Room Holloman - jandy - TV SECT --- ## Page 3 STANDARD FORM NO. '64 Office Memorandum SEC UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO / DIRECTOR, FBI DATE: 10/20/59 SAC, NEW YORK (137-4214) 280,386 Classified by SUBJECT: HORN FOREMAN Annette Eberly IS-R RELEASE CE CIA INFORMATION SAN THIS DOCUMENT. MKH 2-6-981 ReBuäirtel to NY. BSI-R-DBSE0O; 19/15/592 captioned "BURTON VAN ANNETTE SYLVIA EPSTEIN; IS-R."()(Y(U) 3-20-96 ANNETTE EBERLY, obtained from records of the City Court of New York, Bronx County, NY, which reflect subject's name was 5668-520 Referenced airtel denied authority for the NYO to conduct a DESECO] interview with subject. This airtel (SU) also directed that prior investigation concerning subject 97 10-29 S2D/KSR DECLASSIFY ON: 25X (Bufile 140-11741; NY f1le 140-5353) be brought up to date and that discreet inquiries be made among subject's associates to determine the extent and nature of her association with Soviet nationals 7(5) BURTON VAN HORN FORMAN, 160 Claremont Avenue, corporation (ATC) 1016, since September 4, 1959 eu on 9/10/59, FOREMAN advised SAS of the FBI he had had homosexual tendencies in the past. directed that the PSI-R-DESECO case on FOREMAN be closed and 4/98 that no further contacts be initiated with FORMAN, but that information FOREMAN volunteered should be accepted. FOREMAN since voluntarily furnished information concerning American. and Soviet employees of ATC and concerning contacts-.and activities of the officers of Alo REC. 1i Bureau (RM) - New York (134-4214) JCH: mkr (3) 21019800. VICT: 8. 324448502-3 ASSIFIER REE-JIB Sige AND SCORET: 3 оет 23 1959 33a6hW3e EX: 109 ET --- ## Page 4 (NY 134-42147880(4) On 9/17/59, FOREMAN was interviewed at his request at his residence, 160 Claremont Avenue, NYC, bY SAS WILLIAM V. SCHMALTZ and JOHN C. HESSIN. FOREMAN volunteered additional information concerning the activities or are ana furnished s the following information concerning his association with subject: FOREMAN stated he first met the subject in January, 1958 when both he and subject were instructing English at the Street, NYC. FEDORCHENKO (Buffle I05-51672; NY file 105-20553) and BORIS "ST/VANOV: (Bufile 105-36596; NY file 105-124561 started 5 1 che bertluz school. elated the attendance of these Soviets at the Berlitz School S continued through June 1958. FOREMAN Stated that, about one nonth after these soviets started the Berlitz schools thes subject, JORIE, CARRIGUE. (Bufile 105-74489;/NY file 105-32886), himself accompany FEDORCHENKO and. IVANOV on coffee breaks between classes. FOREMAN advised GARRIGUE and DEDERI were also instructors at the Berlitz School and that the teacher-student coffee break relationships at the Berlitz School were a common occurrence. FOREMAN stated this group met for coffee at least once every two weeks and often more frequently. FOREMAN stated they generally retired to thelinternational Cafeteria, RA Building, Rockefeller Center, NYC, and that the coffee breaks generally extended from 5 PM to 5:30 PM. FOREMAN advised subject was first formally invited out by these Soviets]inS prit or May 1950 when FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV requested that subject, DEDERI and himself accompany them to lunch at the Russian following classes at the Berlitz School. FOREMAN on this occasion they engaged in light conversation on general topics. FOREMAN statea to the best of his recollection, he proceeded by subway while the soviets drove DEDERI and subject to their S residences. SECRET - 2 "SEC X-0909 --- ## Page 5 (NY 134-421418814) SEOREO FOREMAN stated in June. 1958 he invited the subject, GARRIGUE, FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV]to a musicale in the residence 5) of a Mrs. FNU LEVITSKY, 160 West 73rd Street, NYC, 9th floor. FOREMAN stated he had previously attended several musicales at the LEVITSKY apartment which were held weekly on Tuesdays during this period in LEVITSKY's apartment. FOREMAN related the people attending the musteales were amateur musicians who met and played for their own pleasure. FOREMAN advised that on no other occasion, to his knowledge, haalsoviet nationals attended these musicales. FOREMAN stated there 3 were about 20 other people present aside Irom the subject GARRIGUE and the mentioned Soviets, but that he was not (S acquainted with any of the FOREMAN advised that following the musicale, the Soviets. S Invited the subject, GArRIGUE and himself to a steak dinner at a restaurant located on West 73rd Street, NYC. FOREMAN advised the conversation during the evening concerned only general topics and was of a bantering nature to the best of residences. FOREMAN stated he invited FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV (S) night in June 1958. attend the affair but sent in his place LEONARD A KOVALEW " (Bufile 105-64470; NY file 105=27651), a Soviet national, employed at the UN Secretariat. FOREMAN related that DEDERI GARRIGUE and subject attended this party as well as several other instructors and pupils from the Berlitz School. FOREMAN advised there were between 20 and 30 people in attendance at FOREMAN stated one of these individuals was a at 454 West 22nd Street, number was chelsea 3-Y208 C, Apartment Aw, and whose telephone FOREMAN stated HARBER became somewhat intoxicated during the evening and started talking about Communism In Spain, speaking apparently with authority on the organization of communist cells in spain. FOREMAN advised HARBER was friendly with KOVALEV land EOREMANt stated he had been informed by subject that during 1958, she (!) -3 ISEC Sri 104798 --- ## Page 6 NY 134-4214)08u) SECRET had dated one AMERICO LNU, HARBER's roommate. FOREMANormant nad been to the apartment shared by HARBER and hamself os tated subject informed him that AMERICO had told her KOVALeWl several occasions. FOREMAN advised he could not presently recall the other people in attendance at the party.cop FOREMAN stated that on a Saturday night in the latter part of July or August, 1958, the subject held a party in ner apartment. FOREMAN stated he believed subject had requested KOVALEV to bring along some of his Soviet friends. (S) FOREMAN advised KOVALEV picked him up at his residence and s drove him to the mentioned party and that YURI I WISHUKOVS! (BufIle 105-64471; NY fIle 105-27649) and a BORIS INU. Soviet nationals, FOREMAN stated, subject, GARRIGUE, DEDERI and FOREMAN's room; JAPAN affair in addition to the mentioned Soviets. FOREMAN advisedS there were also in attendance about a number of people unknown to FOREMAN who were college acquaintances of the subject. FOREMAN stated that on 7/17/59, while visiting the (S) Soviet Trade Fair, ]NYC, he and subject encountered KOVALEY and MISHUKOV on the (Soviet Trade Fair premises. FOREMAN (S) FOREMAN advised (5) a date convenient to FOREMAN. FOREMAN stated pursuant to a call from himself to/KOVALEV onS 7/29/59, he and subject visited KOVALEV at the UNion 7/30/59• (S) about one half hour. FOREMAN stated on 7/14/59, he and subject attended the Russian Festival of Music and Dance, Madison square Garder NYC, where they encountered FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV. FOREMAN (S, stated that after exchanging social amenities, they passed on. SEGRET scien o) 90-10:86 --- ## Page 7 EUK (1) INX 134-4214780 (U) SCONET FOREMAN advised that on 9/11/59, the subject informed him she had made an appointment with FEDORCHENKO at the UN Secretariat and requested FOREMAN accompany her.5 FOREMAN advised the purpose of the visit was to see if the Soviets would be Interested in a plan the subject had con-(s) ceived to set up an English language curriculum especially designed for the various foreign delegations to the UN. S According to FOREMAN subject had planned to draw on former advised that after some additional general. conversation, he and subject departed.. FOREMAN stated there is an amicable relationship between subject, FEDORCHENKO and himself. (5) DEDERI and himself with the Soviets mentioned above, developed S from the student-teacher relationship at the Berlitz School, a curiosity on the part of the subiect, GARRIGUE, DEDERI and himself to find out more about the Soviets and theirS way of life and a desire to exchange Russianjand English (S) language lessons. FOREMAN advised he had never heard sub- ject, GARRIGUE or DEDERI utter remarks that could be construed as sympathetic to the Communist form of government.. FOREMAN related he was a particularly close associate of subject and that she had confided to him that she had been troubled on being turned down for a position with the State Department, US Government, during 1956. FOREMAN stated the subject felt her rejection for the position was the result of some suspected subversive associations of an uncle of the subject. FOREMAN stated subject is a sincere, loyal American and that subject was not bitter over not being accepted by the State Department. the cloud which she believes hangs over it." JORIE GARRIGUE, previously mentioned, furnished the NYO with considerable information concerning soviet nationals inglish teacher to NIKOLAI M 9/4/59. GARRIGUE left ATC to attend pre-medical school au(s the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. -5 - SECRE * (1) DUP SECONS --- ## Page 8 (1) [NY 134-42141814) HOP SEORET On September 3, 1959, GARRIGUE advised SA THOMAS D.J BROOKS that she had been acquainted with the subject and FOREMAN since January 1958 when they all taught at the Berlitz School of Languages,. New York city. GARRIGUE stated she recalled that subject and FOREMAN had, on severa. occasions during 1958, gone out socially with FEDORCHENKO and IVANOVS who were then students of the English language at the Berlitz school. GARRIGUE stated she recalled subject had attended a party at FOREMAN's residence, 160 Claremont Avenue, NYC, during June or July 1958, to which FEDORCHENKO and another Soviet national]were also invited.. GARRIGUE advised subject, FOREMAN, (5) FEDORCHENKO and IVANOV had attended a musicale in a woman's S apartment on West 73rd Street, NYC, during June 1958. was unable to recall specific details of this affair. GARRIGUE GARRIGUE related the association of subject; FOREMAN and herself with the mentioned soviet nationals developed ass a result of student teacher associations at the Berlitz School and through the above mentioned social functions. GARRIGUE relatea subject and English language lessons. of no sympathy on the part of the subject of FOREMAN for Communism and that she had no reason to question their loyalty to the us. In this connection, it is noted GARRiGue's intro- duction and recommendation of FOREMAN to Soviet officials at ArC led to his employment by ATC officials as her replacement as English Instructor at ATC. (S) BACKGROUND (u) [Change of Name ]e (u) On 10/8/59, FRANK CONCILIO, Assistant Deputy Clerk, City Court of NY, County of the Bronx, NY, furnished SA JOHN c. HESSIN with City Court Petition No. 7317, year 1958, captioned ANNETTE SYLVIA EPSTEIN. This petition reflects that on 12/8/58, ANNETTE SYLVIA EPSTEIN, 3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY, made application to the special term, part 2 of the city court of NY, Bronx county, NY, to legally assume the name, ANNETTE EBERLY. This petition reflects that subject stated reason for desiring the change of name was that, for the past two or three years, subject had been known to her friends and business acquaintances by the name ANNETTE EBERLY. Subject's petition was granted on 1/19/59 in the City Court of NY, Bronx County, NY. ECRET 16- SEYET ON USH-106.21 --- ## Page 9 NY 134-4214 Residence] * (u) N SECRE On 9/18/59, a pretext telephone call under the guise of a credit inquiry to KIngsbridge 3-1982 listed to JULIUS EPSTEIN, 3071 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY, by SA JOHN C. HESSIN, determined subject currently resides at that address. It is noted NY report of SA BERTRAM WORTHINGTON, 3/12/56, captioned "ANNETTE. SYLVIA EPSTEIN, APPLICANT - FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICER, DEPARIENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, D.CO, SECURITY OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES" sets forth interviews verifying subject's residence The following Interviews set forth under the caption "Employment" reflects subject resided in France during 1950 and 1957 and at 3071 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, N7, 1958 to date C(U) Employment On 10/1/59, BURTON VAN HORN FOREMAN, previously mentioned, advised SAS SCHMALTZ and HESSIN that he had recently typed an employment resume for subject which reflected subject had tutored the English language to French students at the University of Strasbourg, Strasbougg, France, during 1956 and 1957 yu) on 10/1/59, JOSE MANOS, Assistant Director, Manhattan Office, Berlitz School of Languages, 40 West 5lst Street, NYC, advised the subject applied for a position as English teacher at the Berlitz School on 1/6/50. MANOS stated subject started employment on 1/17/5o as an English instructor and taught at the Berlitz School until 3/4/59, except for the period June through September, 1958, when subject was on summer leave of absence. MANOS stated subject listed her residence address as 3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY. MANOS stated he was personally acquainted with subject and that she was intelligent and competent instructor and that he knew of nothing that would reflect on subject's loyalty to the US Government. MANOS advised subject would not be eligible for rehire because of a spotty attendance record que to extensive sick leave (lu) on 10/1/59, RITA DUNFEE, Assistant to Personne: Director, Benton and Bowles Advertising Agency, 666 Madison Avenue, NYC, advised SA JOHN C. HESSIN subject, as ANNETTE EBERLY , was employed as a research trainee at Benton and Bowles from 3/9/59 through 7/17/59. DUNE stated subject 11sted her )(ul) 7- SECRET --- ## Page 10 did tea to a later. da employment application. subject's personnel file that would reflect adversely on subject's character or loyalty to the US Government. DUNFEE stated subject was eligible for rehire. Miss DUNFEE advised she did not personally recall subject and that there was no one presently the subject. i Benton and Bowles who would be able to recall Director, Time and Life, InC., Rockefeller Center, NYC, advised SA JOHN C. HESSIN that subject, as ANNETTE EBERLY, was employed as a temporary secretary in the Market Research Section of the Fortune Magazine division of Time and Life, Inc., on 9/14/59. Miss WEST advised subject listed her residence as 3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY, on her employment application. Miss WEST stated subject's position is a 6 month temporary employment during a period of maternity leave of another employee. Miss WEST stated that if subject's work record was satisfactory at the termination of the 6 month period, she would be considered for further employment elsewhere in the organization. Miss WEST stated the subject had not been employed for a sufficient period to evaluate her performance or personal characteristics.@ u Education on 10/1/59, BURTON VAN HORN FOREMAN, previously. mentioned, advised. SAS SCHMALTZ and HESSIN that the previously mentioned employment resume typed by FOREMAN for subject reflects that during the period 1956 - 1957, subject attended the University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France as a student of French language and civilization under a French Government scholarship and a Full Bright travel grant. According to FOREMAN, this resume reflected that subject attended the Strasbourg Seminar in American Studies at the University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, during 1957 • FOREMAN advised the resume also reflected subject represented the US at a Seminar of 17 nations at Schloss • Leopol- dor, Strasbourg, France, during 1957-(p)U) '-8 - SECRETI 511-1. --- ## Page 11 SECKEY Election Records ]($/U) on 9/22/59, records of the Board of Elections for the borough of Bronx County, NY, were reviewed by IC ROBERT C. NADLER. The 1955 Signature Book reflects subject, as ANNETTE EPSTEIN, student, registered in 1955, listing a preference for one of the two major political parties (R)(u) on 9/22/59, the records of the Credit Bureau of Greater New York were furnished by PAULINE DE FIORE to IC ALFRED G. ENNULAT. These records contained ne derogatory Information concerning subject or mabers of her family. (i(N) Criminal 71444) on 9/25/59, SA VINCENT F. CLANCY caused the records of the BSS and BCI of the NYCPD to be checked for subject and members of her family. These records contained no information identiflable with subject or members of her fartly. CoU) Informants The following confidential informants who are acquainted with the activities of the CP in the NYC area, were contacted by the following agents on the dates set forth below: These informants were unable to furnish any infor- mation identifiable with subject or members of her family: Informant NY 1086-S NY 2009-S NY 646-S NY 779+5 NY 388-S NY 2124+S NY 384-5* NY 972-S NY 367-S Date Contacted Agent Contacting 9/28/59 DAVID RYAN 9/28/59 DAVID RYAN 9/24/59 JOHN A. HAAG 9/24/59 JOHN A. HAAG 9/22/59 LEROY W. SHEETS 9/24/59 LEROY W. SHEETS 9/22/59 JAMES P. HALLERON 9/23/59 JAMES HALLERON 9/23/59 JAMES P. HALLERON - 9 - Jli-10N:8 --- ## Page 12 ÍSEC NSA REVIEWED BY JURK TASR FORCE. OM 4/24/97 cat * RELEASE IN PART TOTAL DENIAL NX 134-4214 CX4) Miscellaneous REY Prior investigation of subject was conducted by NYO from 2/56 through 5/56 in the case captioned "ANNETTE SYLVIA ESPTEIN; APPLICANT - FOREEGN SERVICE OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, D.C. - SECURITY OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES." Agent, NYC, sent information to Moscow on 5/26/43, mentioning the address 3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY.. Following the address were some missing parts, then came the digits...982. An additional gap in the message was followed by the statement that someone's sentiments were pro-Soviet. Thereafter, considerable portion of the message was missing and then the name LEBEDEV was mentioned. In 1943, the EPSTEIN family (S) residence was 3871 Sedgwick Avenue, Bronx, NY, and the EPSTEIN family telephone number was KIngsbridge 3-1982. It is noted subject was nine years of age in 1943. R The significance of the above information was not known, but, in addition, to forming the basis of the mentioned NEW YORK (SOME) ESP-R" JULIUS EPSTEIN and TATIANA EPSTEIN, subject's parents, LSJ a corollary case was investigated, captioned "NELSON CHIPCHIN, 7 OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES"! (ure 123 53 10 16 440-306 PO A GONERAME ENTORES Considerable investigation was conducted in the unsub case subsequent to termination, in 5/56, of the NYO SGE case of subject. (fl NY letter to Director, 8/23/56, in the unsub case, reflects that during the course of an interview with TATIANA EPSTEIN, the subject's mother, by SAS of the FBI, TATIANA EPSTEIN advised that subject had received a letter from the Department of state, Washington, D.Cs, stating that the Department of state & - 10 - ETI --- ## Page 13 (m) BECK Ny 134-4224J81(4) could not use the subject's services but that their failure to hire her was noc to be considered reflection on subject's character, reputation or abilities. 4) SEGRET for the unknown subject in this case. This report also set forth information in explanation and mitigation of the original information furnished by source 5. In this connection, It Is noted that subject advised BURTON VAN HORN FOREMAN, previously mentioned, in 9/59, that CHIPCHIN was currently employed by (5) the Department of State at Radio Center, Munich, Germany. In view of subject's established acquaintanceship also appears subject would be receptive to an invitation to cooperate with the Bureau concerning her continuing association with Soviet nationals in view of her purported remarks to BURTON: VAN HORN FOREMAN, previously mentioned, to the effect that subject had in the past, possessed a desire to "ölear her name" in regard to suspected subversive activities of an uncle. In this connection, Bureau authority will be requested to interview subject to assess her attitude, availability and potential as a PSIor double agent upon completion of background S checks currently being conducted by the Newark Office and com- pletion of the following request of the Bureau. The Bureau is requested to determine, through liaison, whether CIA has an interest in subject or information concerning the subject, noting subject reportedly attended the University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, during 1956 and 1957. Subjec was born 3/12/34; Bronx, NY•C The Bureau is requested to search Bureau indices for mention of subject under her legally assumed name, ANNETTE EBERLY. - 11 - (Nu) •GE ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32627026.pdf
No RIF - 250 pp. Report to PFIAB/Cuban arms
04/26/2018
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
null
null
## Page 1 JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM AGENCY : NARA RECORD NUMBER : None-listed RECORD SERIES : AGENCY FILE NUMBER : ORIGINATOR : FROM : TO TITLE : Report to PFIAB/Cuban Arms DATE : 10/14/1962 PAGES : SUBJECTS : DOCUMENT TYPE : CLASSIFICATION : RESTRICTIONS : CURRENT STATUS : DATE OF LAST REVIEW : OPENING CRITERIA : COMMENTS : DocId: 32627026 Page 1 --- ## Page 2 VOLUME I ANNEXES TO REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT'S FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY BOARD ON INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES RELATING TO THE CUBAN ARMS BUILD-UP (14 April through 14 October 1962) DocId: 32627026 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 SECRET C RR 2 60251 270 INTERROGATION GUIDE: CUBA DECLASSIFIED EO: 13526, SEC 35 NLK-10-119 SCAP Asa BY MAD. NARA; Date 12 -SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 3 --- ## Page 4 WARNING This material contains information affecting the National Defense of the United States within the meaning of the espionage laws, Title 18, \USC, Secs. 793 and 794, the trans- mission or revelation of which in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. DocId: 32627026 Page 4 --- ## Page 5 SECRET : A N ANNEX A INTERROGATION GUIDE: CUBA This annex consists of the Interrogation Guide: Cuba which was primarily designed for debriefing Cuban escapees/ refugees and for advance briefing and debriefing of visitors (including agents) to Cuba. It also provided a systematic statement of information needs to be used as the basis for collection planning, collection action, and responsive reporting. This guide was originally prepared by CIA in February 1962 for use by the Caribbean Admissions. Center, Opa-Locka. It was revised in March with full community participation. A major revision of the guide took place in May with full USIB coordination.. SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 5 --- ## Page 6 Nombre y apellidos: Condiciones y Costos de Vida Edad: Residencia: (indique provincia, y ciudad si corresponde): 2/62 Sexo: Fecha en que partió de Cuba: I. En Cuba, se consideraba Ud. residente de pueblo o del campo? 2. ¿A qué se dedicaba en Cuba? 3. ¿ Cuánto le reportaba en dinero semanal o mensualmente este oficio inmediamente antes de partir de Cuba? 4. 5. 6. ¿ Ganaba más o ganaba menos en dicho empleo antes de la revolución? ¿ Cuánto mas? ¿Cuánto menos? ¿Además del salario en dinero, ¿recibía también comida, ropa, atencion medica o vivienda suministradas por el gobierno? En tal caso, explique brevemente. 7. ¿Qué medio de transporte usaba para viajar al trabajo? ¿Tuvo dificultad con el transporte últimamente? 8. ¿Cuántas horas por semana se suponía que trabajara? ¿Cuántas horas por semana trabajaba en realidad? ¿Cuántos días por semana trabajaba? Después del trabajo ¿tenía que servir en las milicias o en otra forma? Ixplique brevemente. 10. ¿Tenía Ud. o su familia vivienda tan espaciosa bajo el régimen de Castro como antes? (Conteste sí o no) Si no, ¿ tenía más o tenía menos espacio? DocId: 32627026 Page 6 --- ## Page 7 DocId: 32627026 Page 2/62 11. Artículos de consumo: Precios y Disponibilidad Anote 10 mejor que pueda los siguientes datos sobre precios y disponibilidad de artículos de consumo. Unidad de Peso, Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad Medida o Cantidad en (al momento de Mercado libre 1958 partir) escasez 0 abundancia) de partir) Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origen ALIMENTOS (Especifique el precio de los artículos ali- menticios en términos de cantidad, peso o / medida.) Arroz Frijoles negros Frijoles coloradas Garbanzos Chícharos Malanga Gallina Garne de res Garne de puerco Tocino Jamón Embutidos Mantequilla Manteca --- ## Page 8 DocId: 32627026 Page 2/62 Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad en 1958 (al momento de Mercado libre (escasez o partir) (al momento abundancia) de partir) Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origen ALIMENTOS (Especifique el precio de los artículos ali- menticios en términos de cantidad, peso o medida.) Aceite de aliva Aceite de maní Aceite de soya Queso Pescado fresco (diga que clase) Café Azúcar Leche fresca Leche enlatada Alimentos enlatados (indique clase) Cebolla AJO Tomates Naranjas dulces PIñe Otras hortalizas ( indique clase ) --- ## Page 9 DocId: 32627026 Page Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad Precio Precio Oficial en (al momento de 1958 partir) Precio en el Disponibilidad Mercado libre (escasez o (al momento abundancia) de partir) 2/62 Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origen ALIMENTOS (Especifique el precio de los artículos ali- menticios en términos de cantidad, peso o medida.) Pimienta Sal ROPA De hombre: Ropa de trabajo Pantalones 1 par Camisa Zapatos Calcetines 1 par 1 par Camiseta Calzoncillos 1 par De vestir Flus (precio medio) 1 Zapatos (precio medio ) 1 par --- ## Page 10 DocId: 32627026 Page Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad Precio Precio Oficial en 1958 (al momento de partir) Precio en el Disponibilidad Mercado libre (escasez o (al momento abundancia) de partir) 2/62 Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origen ROPA De señora: Ropa de casa Ropa de salir (precio medio) 1 Pañuelo para la cabeza Enagua o refajo Medias de nylon Media de rayón Medias de algodón Zapatos corrientes Zapatos de vestir De niño: Escolar para varones Pantalones Camisa Zapatos 1 par 1 par 1 par 1 par 1 par T° --- ## Page 11 DocId: 32627026 Page 11 2/62 Unidad de Peso, Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad Observaciones Medida o Cantidad en 1958 •(al momento de Mercado libre partir) (al momento (escasez o abundancia) sobre calidad y país de origen de partir) ROPA Escolar para niñas Vestido Blusa Falda Zapatos 1 par otros artículos: Frazada Sábana Toalla de baño ARTICULOS NO DE CONSUMO ( Diga si puede la marca, el estilo y otras características. ) Televisor Radio Plancha eléctrica Refrigerador Cocina eléctrica --- ## Page 12 DocId: 32627026 Page 12 Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad ARTICULOS NO DE CONSUMO Cocina de gas Sartén de hierro Sartén de aluminio Bicicleta ARTICULOS DIVERSOS Fósforos ( clase y cantidad ) Cigarros ( clase y cantidad .) Tabacos ( clase y cantidad ) Gas embotellado (cantidad ) Kerosén (cantidad ) Gasolina (cantidad ) Aceite de motor ( cantidad) Jabón (clase y cantidad) Precio en 1958 2/62 Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad Observaciones (al momento de partir) Mercado libre (escasez o (al momento . sobre calidad abundancia) y país de origéti de partir --- ## Page 13 DocId 32627026 Page Datos sobre los Programas de Radio 2/62 El siguiente cuestionario esta siendo distribuido a todos los pasajeros que desembarcan desde Cuba. El proposito del mismo es el de recopilar datos sobre los programas de radio, transmitidos desde el extranjero, que se estan oyendo en Cuba. No encierra compromiso alguno para Ud. ya que no es necesario que Ud. firme nada, ni ponga su nombre en ninguna parte. Simplemente solicitamos su cooperacion rogandole llene el cuestionario siguiente y lo eche al correo, en el sobre que adjuntamos, favor que se le agradecera sinceramente. 1. ¿Cuando Ud. estaba en Cuba, acostumbraba oir programas de radio desde el extranjero? Si NO No recuerdo, o no se 2. Diganos, por favor, los programas y emisoras que Ud. oia con preferencia, en que idioma los oia, a que hora, y si la recepcion era buena, regular o mala. Programa Emisora Idioma Hora Buena Recepcion Mala Regular Comentarios 3. ¿ En que termino municipal vivia Ua.? 4. ¿Tenia radio de onda larga sola Provincia 5. Onda corta y larga ¿Que tipo de programa desde el extranjero, cree Ud. que seria de mayor utilidad en Cuba en los momentos actuales? 6. Haga a continuacion cualquier comentario que Ud. quiera hacer sobre los programas de radio dirigidos el extranjero. a Cuba desde 7. Comentario en general: --- ## Page 14 Nombre y apellidos: Condiciones y Costos de Vida Edad: Residencia: (indique provincia, y ciudad si corresponde): 2/62 Sexo: Fecha en que partió de Cuba: 1. En Cuba, se consideraba Ua. residente de pueblo o del campo? 2. ¿A qué se dedicaba en Cuba? 3. ¿ Cuánto le reportaba en dinero semanal o mensualmente este oficio inmediamente antes de partir de Cuba? 4. ¿ Ganaba más o ganaba menos en dicho empleo antes de la revolución? 5. ¿ Cuánto más? ¿Cuanto menos? ¿Además del salario en dinero, ¿recibía también comida, ropa, atencion medica o vivienda suministradas por el gobierno? En tal caso, explique brevemente. 7. ¿Qué medio de transporte usaba para viajar al trabajo? ¿Tuvo dificultad con el transporte últimamente? 8. ¿Cuántas horas por semana se suponía que trabajara? ¿Cuántas horas por semana trabajaba en realidad? ¿Cuántos días por semana trabajaba? Despues del trabajo ¿tenía que servir en las milicias o en otra forma? Explique brevemente. 10. ¿Tenía la, o su familia vivienda tan espaciosa bajo el régimen de Castro como antes? (Conteste sí o no) Si no, ¿ tenía más o tenía menos espacio? DocId: 32627026 Page 14 --- ## Page 15 DocId: 32627026 Page 2/62 11. Artículos de consumo: Precios y Disponibilidad Anote 10 mejor que pueda los siguientes datos sobre precios y disponibilidad de artículos de consumo. Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el (al momento de Mercado libre 1958 partir) (al momento de partir) Disponibilidad escasez o abundancia) Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origen ALIMENTOS (Especifique el precio de los artículos ali- menticios en términos de cantidad, peso o medida.) Arroz Frijoles negros Frijoles coloradas Garbanzos Chícharos Malanga Gallina Garne de res Garne de puerco Tocino Jamón Embutidos Mantequilla Manteca --- ## Page 16 DocId: 32627026 Pag 16 2/62. Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad Precio Precio Oficial • Precio en el Disponibilidad (al momento de Mercado libre (escasez 0 1958 partir) (al momento abundancia) de partir) Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origen ALIMENTOS (Especifique el precio de los artículos ali- menticios en términos de cantidad, peso o medida.) Aceite de aliva Aceite de maní Aceite de soya Queso Pescado fresco (diga que clase) Café Azúcar Leche fresca Leche enlatada Alimentos enlatados (indique clase) Cebolla Ajo Tomates Naranjas dulces Piña Otras hortalizas (indique clase ) --- ## Page 17 DocId: 32627026 Page 17 Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad ALIMENTOS Especifique el precio de los artículos ali- menticios en términos de cantidad, peso o medida.) Pimienta Sal ROPA De hombre: Ropa de trabajo Pantalones Camisa Zapatos Calcetines Camiseta Calzoncillos 1 par 1 par 1 par 1 par De vestir Flus ( precio medio ) 1 Zapatos ( precio medio ) 1 par Precio Precio Oficial en 1958 (al momento de partir) Precio en el Disponibilidad Mercado libre (escasez o (al momento abundancia) de partir) 2/62 Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origen ₴ --- ## Page 18 DocId: 32627026 Page. 18 Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad Precio Precio Oficial en 1958 (al momento de partir) Precio en el Disponibilidad Mercado libre (escasez o (al momento abundancia) de partir) 2/62 Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origen ROPA De señora: Ropa de casa Ropa de salir (precio medio) 1 Pañuelo para la cabeza Enagua o refajo Medias de nylon Media de rayón Medias de algodón Zapatos corrientes Zapatos de vestir • De niño: Escolar para varones Pantalones Camisa Zapatos ^24 1 par 1 par 1 par 1 par 1 par 1 par --- ## Page 19 DocId: 32627026 Page 2/62 Unidad de Peso, Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad Observaciones Medida o Cantidad en (al momento de Mercado libre (escasez o 1958 partir) (al momento abundancia) sobre calidad y país de origen de partir) ROPA Escolar para niñas Vestido Blusa Falda Zapatos 1 par Otros artículos: Frazada Sábana Toalla de baño 1 ARTICULOS NO DE CONSUMO ( Diga si puede la marca, el estilo y otras características. ) Televisor Radio Plancha eléctrica Refrigerador Cocina eléctrica --- ## Page 20 DocId: 32627026 Page 20 Unidad de Peso, Medida o Cantidad Precio Precio Oficial Precio en el Disponibilidad (al momento de Mercado libre (escasez o 1958 partir) (al momento abundancia) de partir 2/62- Observaciones sobre calidad y país de origel ARTICULOS NO DE CONSUMO Cocina de gas Sartén de hierro Sartén de aluminio Bicicleta ARTICULOS DIVERSOS Fósforos (clase y cantidad ) Cigarros ( clase y cantidad ) Tabacos ( clase y cantidad ) Gas embotellado (cantidad ) Kerosén ( cantidad ) Gasolina ( cantidad ) Aceite de motor (cantidad) Jabón (clase y cantidad) $. 85-6 --- ## Page 21 DocId: 326 27026 Pade 21 Datos sobre los Programas de Radio 2/62 El siguiente cuestionario esta siendo distribuido a todos los pasajeros que desembarcan desde Cuba. El proposito del mismo es el de recopilar datos sobre los programas de radio, transmitidos desde el extranjero, que se estan oyendo en Cuba. No encierra compromiso alguno para Ud. ya que no es necesario que Ud. firme nada, ni ponga su nombre en ninguna parte. Simplemente solicitamos su cooperacion rogandole llene el cuestionario siguiente y lo eche al correo, en el sobre que adjuntamos, favor que se le agradecera sinceramente: 1. ¿Cuando Ud. estaba en Cuba, acostumbraba oir programas de radio desde el extranjero? Si No recuerdo, o no se 2. Diganos, por favor, los programas y emisoras que Ud. oia con preferencia, en que idioma los oia, a que hora, y si la recepcion era buena, regular o mala. Programa Emisora Idioma Hora Recepcion Buena Mala Regular Comentarios 3. ¿ En que termino municipal vivia Ud.? 4. ¿Tenia radio de onda larga sola Provincia 5. Onda corta y larga ¿Que tipo de programa desde el extranjero, cree Ua. que seria de mayor utilidad en Cuba en los momentos actuales? 6. 7. Haga a continuacion cualquier comentario que Ua. quiera hacer sobre los programas de radio dirigidos a Cuba desde el extranjero. Comentario en general: --- ## Page 22 EXEMPTED NUI. 10. 119 4/11 SECRET sanitized NLK-10-19 ISCAP Appeal, 19/18 5/62 MEMORANDUM FOR: Recipients of Interrogation Guide: Cuba (C-RR2 60251) FROM: SUBJECT: Chief, Intelligence Information Staff, ORR Revision of C-RR2 60251 1. When the Interrogation Guide: Cuba (C-RR2 60251) was published, recipients were advised that it would be updated periodically. Attached are current changes with revision date 5/62 (May 1962) marked in upper right hand corner of each change page. 2. The Watch List, pages iii and iv, is to be deleted and the new List inserted in its place. 3. The following changes are to be made as indicated: Delete Insert Page No. (s.) Section Page No. (s) 6 1000 6 Section 1000 18 1000 18-18a 27 2000 27-270 1000 1000 28 2000 28:.. 2000 31 2000 31-31a 2000 32 2000 44 3000 32-32m 44 2000 3000 47 3000 47 3000 55 3000 55-55a 3000 62 3000 62 3000 64 3000 64 3000 65 3000 65-65a 3000 66 3000 66-66a 3000 SE CRE T DocId: 32627026 Page 22 --- ## Page 23 SECRET 5/62 Delete Page No. (s) 82 115 sectior 4000 5000 Insert Page No. (s) 82 115 Section 4000 5000 4. The page listing the Annexes (Section 8000) is to be deleted and the new page listing Annex C inserted. Pages C-1 through C-13 are to be inserted after Annex B: 5. The airfield map in the front of the Guide includes. only selected air facilities. Changes should be made on the map to indicate the recently constructed Santa Clara International airfield. The present dimensions are estimated to be 10,400 feet long; the; saving is reportedly nearing completion. For the Chief, Intelligence Information Staff Edgar a Bradley EDGAR BRADLEY Chief, Requirements Branch Office of Research and Reports - 2 S E CRET DocId: 32627026 Page 23 --- ## Page 24 SECR ET TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWARD- WATCH LIST- 1000 POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL Political Dynamics-. Political Policies and Objectives----- Structure and Operation of Government- Communist Party Control= Organization-- Political leaders=-- Prisions-------- Judiciary- Intelligence and Security Organizations Organization-- Personnel--- Training- Operational Activities- Soviet Intelligence Services in Cuba-- Sociological Population Population Movements- Attitudes-- Ethnic Differences--=-- Reception of Foreigners- Social Structure- Religion-- Education- University- Secondary Schools- Primary Schools-- Adult Education-- Trade Schools- News Media-.• Psychological-- 2000 MILITARY General-- Guided Missiles-- Installations and Equipment- SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 24 5/62 Question Number -Page Number 1001-1006 1007-1009 1010-1021 1022-1031 1032-1037 1038-1043 1044-1050 1051-1069 1070-1079 1080-1086 1087-1090 1099-1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119-1126 1127-1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138-1141 1142-1146 iii 1 2 6 7 10 11 • 11 14 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 19 20 20 20 21 21 21 2001-2035 2036-20399 2040-2046 23. 27 27c --- ## Page 25 SECRET 2000 3000 MILITARY (Continued) Shipments of Bloc Arms- Planning------- Security Organizations and Functions- General Questions on Cuban Navy--- Fishing Fleet--- Maritime Activities----- Cryptologic Information ana Material- Communications Cryptologic Activities- Cryptologic Equipment- Radio Agents---- Intercept and Crypt Analysis (COMINT) Activities----- Communications Countermeasures Signals- Electronic Information and Material---- Non-Communicative Signals- Cuban Air Force General-- Air Order of Battle and State of Readiness-. Personnel------ EW/GCI Radar Order of Battle- AAA Order of Battle- Organizational Training- Training---- Key Air Force Personnel and Biographic Information-- Logistics-- Means of Identification- Electronics--- Ammunition Storage-- Highway Construction- Air Facilities- Medical Facilities- Hospitals---- ECONOMIC Economic Planning and Programs National Planning Economic Growth-- Economic Control Structure- Domestic Finance- Foreign Trade- SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 25 5/62 Question Number Page. Number 2047-2049 2050-2052 2053-2057 2058-2080 20801-20802 20803-20805 2081 2082-2083 2084 2085-2087 2088-2089 2090 2091-2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108-2124 28 28 29 29 31 31a 32 32 32 32b 32b 32b 32c 32d 32e 32€ 32e 32f 32f 32f 32F 32g 32g 328 32g 32h 32h 32h 32i 321 3001-3002 3003-3006 3007-3008 3009-3011 33 33 34 35 --- ## Page 26 SECRET 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Prices- Commodities---- U.S. Trade Embargo- International Finance- Convertible Currencies- Nonconvertible Currency- Arms Payments---- Multilateral Payments Agreement--. Miscellaneous-- Bloc Economic Aid-- Industrilization- Specific Projects- Soviet Bloc Technical Assistance~ Industry-- General-------- Industrial Sectors of Interest-. Manufacturing Industries- Information Needed--- Specific Information Needs on Key Indus- tries--. Mining Industries-- Manufacturing Industries- Service Industries-. Transportation-- National Level-- Harbor Facilities Port Security--- Merchant Shipping- Civil Air- Local Level Automobile- Railroad- Trucking Busses-- Taxi Service-- Electric Power- Organization and Administration--- Labor Force- SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 26 5/62 Question Number Page Number 3012-3014 3015-3026 3027-3029 3030-3034 3035 3036-3039 3040 3041-3045 3046-3049 3050 3051-3059 3060-3067 3068 3069 3070-3093 3094 3095-3098 3099 3100-3110 3111-3119 3120-3125 3126-3129 3130-31327 3133 3134 3135 3136 : 3137 3138-3140 3141 40 40 41 41 42 43 43 43 44 45 46 46 47 47 48 51 51 51 52 52 52 53 54 54 55a 55a 55a 56 57 57 58 58 59 --- ## Page 27 SECRET 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Production--. Powerplants-- Transmission- Consumption-- Aid----- Problems--- Costs--- National Level Local Level-- Telephone System- National Level- Local Level-- Telegraph System- Radio and Television National Level-- Local Level--- Agriculture--- Agricultural Organization and Policies---- Agricultural Production-- Agricultural Input Factors-- Procurement and Distribution of Agricultural Products- Miscellaneous-- -= - Outline of Key Topics for assessment of labor force- Questions for the development of information-- Organized Labor Worker morale- Consumer Welfare--- General Direction of Living Standards--- Availability and Quality of Goods--- Availability and Quality of Housing- Availability and Quality of Other Services--- Emphasis in Distribution of Goods and Services-- Regime Vulnerabilities in Consumer Welfarea Extent of censorship in Cube- SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 27 5/62 Question Number Page Number 3142-3146 3147-3153 3154-3156 3157-3158 3159-3162 3163-3165 3166-3169 3170-3179 3180-3184 3185-3190 3-91-3201 3202 3203-32076 3208-3214 3215-3217 3218-3263 3264-3274 3275-3279 3280-3281 3282-3289 3290-3301 3302-3315 3316-3321 3322 3323 3324 3325 3326 3327 3328 72 72 73 74 76 77 79 79 79 79 79 80 80 •80 --- ## Page 28 SECRET 3000 4000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Procedures for persons to follow in order to leave Cuba- Asylum--- GEOGRAPHIC Physical Setting-- Relief and Drainage- Water Supply- Vegetation--- Wildlife-- Climate- Travel--- Rail-passenger- Rail-freight- Inter-urban Bus- Inter-urban Bicycle, horse, burro, Foot--. Water-- Air----- Urban Public Transportation-• Automobile--- Travel Controls-- Special Regulations- Clandestine Movement- Sensitive Installations General---- Authorization to enter restricted areas - Movement within restricted areas--- Authorization to live in restricted areas - Authorization to leave a restricted area----- Local Business Conditions- General- Business Controls------- Foreign Business Community-- Housing-- Eating and Buying Food---- Social Activities-. SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 28 5/62 Question Number Page Number 3329 3330 80 81 4001-4003 4004-4007 4008-4012 4013-4016 4017-4019 4020-4023 4024-4030 4031-4035 4041-4044 4045-4054 4055-4058 4059-4066 4067-4071 4072-4082 4083-4090 4091-4092 4093-4102 4103-4109 4110-4115 4116-4121 4122-4133 4134-4140 4141-4143 4144-4148 4149-4150 4151-4171 82 82 82 83 84 84 85 85 87 89 89 90 91 92 93 93 94 95 95 95 96 97 97 98 98 99: 99 99 102 104 --- ## Page 29 SECRET 4000 GEOGRAPHIC (Continued) 5000 6000 Employment---- Postal Communications-- Medical and Dental-- Miscellaneous Personal Activities-- Documentation--. FACTORY MARKINGS Exploitation opportunities- Interrogation opportunities-- DEBRIEFING AIDS Map of Cuba----- Factory Markings Handbook-- Consumer Welfare Questionnaire- Radio Broadcast Questionnaire-- Grid Sketch Map-- 7000 ILLUSTRATIONS 8000 ANNEXES Annex A-- Annex B- Annex C-- DocId: 32627026 Page 29 5/62 Question Number Page Number 4172-4178 4179-4194 4195-4201 4202-4220 4221-4231 107 108 110 111 112 5001 5002 115 115 6001 6002 6003 6004 6005 116 116 116 116 116. A-1 B-1 C-1 --- ## Page 30 SECRET 5/62 WATCH LIST (5/62) This Watch List contains selected occupations, organizations and geographic area in which there is a continuing and high priority interest. This List will be revised in light of responsive reporting and changing information needs. Headquarters should be notified promptly when sources knowledgeable on Watch List items become available so that detailed requirements can be provided for exploitation in depth. I. Military Officers; 2. Industrial plant managers and foremen; 3. Technicians including communications specialists; 4. Harbor pilots and port captains; 5. Employees from: ORI (Integrated Revolutionary Organization) JUCEPLAN (Central Committee for Planning) under which also: Direccion de Estadisticas Directorate of Statistics) CTC-R (Revolutionary Cuban Workers' Central) JUCEI (Councils for Coordination, Executive and Inspection) INRA - Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria (National Institute for Agrarian Reform) under which also: ANGP - Administration Nacional de Granjas del Pueblo (National Administration of People's Farms) AGCC - Administracion General de las Coopera- tivas Caneras (General Administration of Cane Cooperatives ANAP - Asociacion Nacional de Agricultores Pequenos (National Association of Small Farmers) Ministerio de Economia (Ministry of the Economy) Ministerio de Comercio del Exterior (Ministry of Foreign Trade) Ministerio de Comercio del - Interior (Ministry of Internal Trade) Ministerio de Comunicaciones (Ministry of Communications) Red Oficial de Comunicaciones por Microondus (ROCMI.) Ministerio de Industrias (Ministry of Industry) under which also: ICP - Instituto Cubano de Petroleo (Cuban Petroleum Institute) ICM - Instituto Cubano de Mineria (Cuban Mineral Institute) iii SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 30 --- ## Page 31 SECRET 5/62 WATCH LIST (Continued) Empresa Consolidada de la Goma (Consolidated Enterprise for Rubber) Empresa Consolidada de Minas (Consolidated Enterprise for Mining) Empresa Consolidada de la Electricidad (Consolidated Enter- prise for Electric Power) Ministerio de Transporte (Ministry of Iransport) under which also: Impresa Consolidada de Navigacion (Consolidated Enterprise for Merchant Shipping) Empresa Consolidada de Cubana de Aviacion (Consolidated Enterprise for Civil Aviation - Cubana) Moa Bay and Nicaro Nickel Plants Banco Nacional (National Bank) 6. Former residents from: General area of Pinar del Rio and Vinales. General area of Cienfuegos and Trinidad. iv. DocId: 32627026 Page 31 --- ## Page 32 SECRET 5/62 1000 POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL (Continued) Political Leaders (Continued) 1037 Does source know any officials of the Communist Party; local government? What is his evaluation of them? What influences do their wives or close relatives have upon them? Prisons 1038 Where are prisons located? 1039 Is there any separation in the prisons between criminals or political prisoners? 1040 What is the political supervision of the guards and prison officials? Whom, among the guards or officials would be susceptible to bribery? prisoners? 1041 What are visiting hours and regulations for political For criminals? 1042 Who are the outstanding prisoners that source knows of? 1043 Whom does source suspect to be innocent political prisoners? Judiciary 1044 What does source know of the civil judiciary? 1045 Who are the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys? 1046 Whom are they seen with professionally and whom are they seen with privately? 1047 How susceptible is this group to bribery? What are the controls over them? 1048 Can source name any judges he thinks are untainted by the Communist touch? Any attorneys? 1049 Is there any indication that the judiciary disagrees with the regime? 1050 To what extent is the civil judiciary influenced in civil and criminal cases by the Communist bosses? - 6 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 32 --- ## Page 33 SECRET 5/62 1000 POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL (Continued) Sociological (Continued) Religion (Continued) 1126 Do the religious of the main city have contact with religious in other areas of the island? Education 112? Report information about policies and activities of the Castro regime regarding the educational system and how it is affected by the regime. Report on the following: a. Any details concerning the literacy program regarding instruction, instructors, time and place of meetings; b. To what extent is there any real change in literacy? c. Has Castro's educational program done more than teach people to write their names? ¿. How many Cubans have been forced to participate in the literacy program? e. How many volunteered to take the literacy courses? f. Is it a continuing program? g. Were all Cubans participating in the literacy courses indoctrinated in Communist ideology? If so was the indoctrination Soviet slanted or Chinese? 1128 Does source know of any new scientific or technical.colleges or universities that have been or are being set up? What are their specialities? Describe; give date of observation and locations. 1129 Who are the major school administrators and teachers? Give a complete estimate of each as to: a. Intellect b. Political leanings - pro or anti-Castro c. Influence on students - 18 - SECRET 'DocId: 32627026 Page 33 --- ## Page 34 SECRET 5/62 1000 POLITICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL. (Continued) Education (Continued) d. Associations and persons who control each e. Outside activities 1130 Where do the school administrators and teachers live? To whom are they related? 1131 How is Communist policy interjected into the educational system? 1132 What students have been sent to the Sino-soviet Bloc countries for technical training? - 18a SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 34 --- ## Page 35 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) General (Continued) 2035 Transportation and communication facilities serving military areas: any new construction? Type and status. (See also Section 3000, paras 3099-3137). Guided Missiles 2036 There have been many rumors and low grade reports of missile activity in Cuba. In view of present and potential conditions in Cuba, there is a continuing requirement for information or indica- tions of plans to procure missiles or of military assistance agreements between the Soviet Bloc and Cuba for supplying short range, intermediate range or air-to-surface missiles. 2037 Does source know of any new or unusual laboratories, plants, or restricted field sites, such as missile test or launch facilities? If under construction, how far has work gone? Describe: give date, locations, quantities, and originating country. 2038 Any construction of missile sites, evidence of mobile missile launchers, evidence of ships or boats equipped for missile launching, or characteristics and combat readiness of missiles would be of priority interest. 2039 Any training of Cuban military forces in handling missiles? Any information on presence of Bloc missile experts. 20391 Improvements or additions to the transportation facil- ¡ties, particularly in remote areas. a. Repairs to rail bed to provide more shockfree ride. Reinforcing or replacing of existing rail or highway bridges. c. Construction of new rail lines or spurs. d. Paving, widening, and elimination of sharp curves on existing highways. e. Construction of new highways. f. Addition of new railroad stations. - 27- SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 35 --- ## Page 36 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Guided Missiles (Continued) 20392 cargoes. 20393 20394 g. Elimination of stops on rail routes. h. Extension of cargo plane and helicopter service into new areas. i. Additions or elimination of stops on inland waterways. Reports of special types of transportation equipment and a. Oversize railroad cars (box or flat), road transporters, or special barges designed for handling large bulky objects. b. Large, bulky, one-piece cargoes, either enclosed in crates or covered with canvas. c. Priority handling of trains or highway convoys. d. Special cars for transporting dangerous liquids, cryogenic liquids, gas under high pressure. e. •Special measures taken to protect cargoes from effects of inclement weather, shock, or observation. Security measures. a. Restriction of areas, closing off of access roads, restriction of population movement within the area. b. Special security measures on trains and highway convoys. c. Deployment of security troops. d. Deviations in flights of civil aircraft. Surveying activities. a. Extension of triangulation network (first order). b. Gravimetric surveys. c. Electronic surveys (HIRAN, radar trilateration, etc.). - 27a - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 36 --- ## Page 37 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Guided Missiles (Continued) 20395 Population movements. a. Evacuation of civilian population. b. Creation of new settlements having unusually large numbers of skilled workers. c. Movement of military personnel into new areas: 20396: Construction Activities. Forest clearing, when not associated with the lumbering industry. b. Land grading (for unidentified purposes). c. Earth-moving and excavation. d. Erection of large steel and concrete structures. e. Construction of new military housing in remote areas. I. Transportation and assembly of large quantities of construction materials and equipment. g. Construction of underground installations. h. Visits to construction projects by VIP's. 20397 Communication facilities. a. Extension of land lines (telephone and telegraph) particularly in remote areas. b. Extension of radio facilities (including microwave). 20398. Power facilities. a. Construction of new, relatively small power plants in isolated areas. b. Use of mobile power plants. c. Extension of power lines into remote areas. - 2то = SECRET DocId:32627026 Page 37 --- ## Page 38 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Guided Missiles (Continued) 20399 Commodities, tools, and equipment. a. Installation of new, high-precision machine tools. b. Installation of large, semi-automatic or fully automatic welding equipment. c. Consumption of large quantities of stainless steel and aluminum sheet. à. Consumption of copper, K-monel, magnesium alloys, chrome, molybdenum, and titanium. e. Consumption of large quantities of electric cable and thin-wall tubing. f. Receipt, storage, and use of dangerous liquids, cryogenic liquids, and high pressure gases. §. Production of miniaturized computers, gyros, and accelerometers. Installations and Equipment 2040 Description of any new naval, army, or air bases, or any unusual weapons or military equipment that may have been supplied by the sino-soviet Bloc. Date of observation, locations, quantities, and originating country. Detailed description and/or sketch of equip- ment, indicating e.g., approximate dimensions, estimated caliber of weapons, number of wheels per vehicle, size and shape of antennas, etc. 2041 Descriptions of any unusual aircraft, ships, or vehicle seen or reported. Date of information, locations, quantities, and originating countries. 2042 Descriptions of any new or unusual instruments that may- have come from the Sino-Soviet Bloc. Date of information, quantities, and originating country. 2043 Detailed information regarding location, staffing mission, and operations of local investigative officers, formerly G-2 MINAR, with particular emphasis on identification of the organizations to which the Office belongs at present. - 27c - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 38 --- ## Page 39 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) General Questions on Cuban Navy (Continued) d. Dry provisions e. Fresh provisions f. General stores g. Clothing h. Medicinal stores 2073 List potential or critical shortages which may affect logistic levels. 2074 What are the quantities of POL stocks on hand or available on reporting date? List designators of various types of POL products. 2075 What is the Cuban Naval intelligence organization ashore and afloat? Describe. 2076 What is the relation of naval intelligence to the other Cuban intelligence activities? Describe. 2077 Is there a training school for naval intelligence personnel? Describe. 2078 Io what extent are bloc personnel engaged in intelligence activities? Training? 2079: What counterintelligence practices are utilized by the navy? Discuss. 2080 What are the operational frequencies for Navy communica- tions? Fishing Fleet 20801 What is the military potential - availability and adaptability. for military use; troop and cargo capabilities? 20802 Plans for utilization of fleet during emergency or wartime. - 31 - SECRET DocId:32627026 Page 39 --- ## Page 40 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Maritime Activities 20803 Status and operations of Cuban merchant vessels. 20804 Patterns of Cuban merchant ships cabotage operations. 20805 Locations of fishing areas and operating patterns of fishing fleets. - 31a..- SE CRET DocId: 32627026 Page 40 --- ## Page 41 SECRET 5/62 ,2000 MILITARY (Continued) Cryptologic Information and Material Communications Cryptologic Activities 2081 Detailed data concerning the type and purpose of com- munications, technique of transmission and reception, associated security devices and communications regulations and procedures uti- Lized by foreign Armed Forces, Secret Police, and civil or state agencies at any echelon. The required data includes: a. Precise location, organization, training, subordina- tion, associated personality lists, and other pertinent order of battle data. b. Mission to include, communications procedures and regulations involving cryptologic activities, call signs, frequencies, schedules, authentication systems, signal operating instructions and signal operating procedures. c. Technical data providing identifying descriptions and operating characteristics of communications and enciphering de- ciphering equipment used in transmitting and receiving emcrypted traffic. a. Relationship and influence with respect to communi- cations matters, technically and operationally, of the USSR (or other foreign nations) on the Ministry of Defense, Armed Forces and civil or state communications and electronic establishments of soviet Bloc (or other foreign) countries. e. Original or copies of communications traffic and message processing tapes, enciphered or plain text. Cryptologic Equipment ..2082 Detailed technical data concerning all enciphering and deciphering devices to include: a. Physical description, actual use, operating theory, procedures and characteristics. = 32 - SEC RET DocId: 32627026 Page 41 --- ## Page 42 •SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Cryptologic Equipment (Continued) b. Maintenance procedures, techniques, problems. ..c. Identification and precise location of users. &. Research and development on improved or new devices. e. Production, sales and shipping. data, military supply channels and procedures. L. Location and organization of laboratories, production, supply, maintenance and distribution facilities! Personality lists anddata on/or from individuals concerned with any of the above. h. Distinctive nomenclature, slang expressions, nicknames, procedural language, double talk, associated with any of the above. 2083 Detailed technical data concerning codes and ciphers to include: of code and cipher system. Description and explanation of types and composition b. How created and by whom (individuals and organiza- tions) : Co. Methods, circumstances, and purpose of use. d. From who received and distribution channels. e. Identification (personality lists and data) of holders of codes and ciphers or of individuals concerned with any of the f. Originals, photographs and/or memory sketches of keys, - 322 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 42 --- ## Page 43 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Cryptologic Equipment (Continued) charts, codes, ciphers, pad pages, encrypted and plain text messages, authentication systems, logs, instruction manuals or other cryptologic guidance. Radio Agents 2084 Agent schedules; transmission and receiving frequencies; copies of incoming and outgoing traffic; operational procedures and techniques; details as to the code/communications training of agents; modus operandi associated with agent communications procedures and con- trolling personnel; originals, photographs or memory sketches of pad pages, keys, codes, ciphers, etc. Intercept and Crypt-Analysis (COMINT) Activities Detailed data to include precise location, organization, training, associated personality lists, subordination and other perti- nent order of battle data. 2086 Mission to include, type, echelon and identification of U.S. and other national communications on which foreign nations concen- trate; scope of intercept coverage; techniques of intercept operations, crypto-analytical techniques and methods; successes achieved; types and 2087 Technical and performance data providing identifying descriptions and operating characteristics,: capabilities and methods of use of intercept, direction finding, special identification techniques, and intercept processing equipment; traffic analysis, and cryptanalysis. Communications Countermeasures Signals 2088 General: Data concerning the type and purpose of commun- ications signals, means of transmission and associated operational procedures, employed to reduce the effectiveness of U.S. or allied ..com- munications equipment and activity. - 320 - SEC RET DocId:32627026 Page 43 --- ## Page 44 id, SE RET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Communications Countermeasures Signals (Continued) 2089 Specific: Detailed data related to the above to include: a. Precise location, organization, subordination, train- ing, associated personality lists, and other pertinent order of battle. b. Mission to include identification of U.S. or other national communications equipment, activity or organization on which foreign countermeasure action is concentrated. employed. c. Scope of capability, successes achieved, techniques ¿. Technical data providing identifying descriptions, and operating characteristics of equipment utilized. Relationship and influence of the USSR (or other foreign governments) on countermeasure operations, and policies. Electronic Information and Material 2090 Non-communicative Signal Intercept and Analysis (ELINT) Activities. a. Detailed data to include precise location, organi- zation, training, associated personality lists, subordination and other pertinent order of battle. b. Mission to include type, echelon and identification of U.S: and other national non-communications signals on which foreign nations concentrate, scope of intercept coverage; techniques of inter- cept operation; analytical techniques and methods; successes achieved; types and distribution of reports produced. c. Technical and performance data providing identifying descriptions and operating characteristics, capabilities and methods of use of intercept, direction finding and intercept analytical equipment - 32c - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 44 --- ## Page 45 S..E..C-R.E.T 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Electronic Information and Material (Continued) and electronic jamming and deception activities. Non-communicative Signals 2091 General: Data concerning the type and purpose of non-communications signals, means of transmission and reception, associated security devices and procedures, to include: a. Radars - offensive, defensive and passive. b. Weapon detonator systems, e.g,. VT fuses. c. Guidance and control systems. d. Electronic counter and counter-countermeasures systems. 2092 Specific: Detailed data related to 2091a above to include: Precise location, organization, subordination, training, associated personality lists, and other pertinent order of battle. b. Mission: Operating procedures and regulations. c. Technical data providing identifying descriptions and operating characteristics of equipment utilized for non- communications purposes, 2091a above. d. Parameters of signals omitted from non-communicative equipment 2091a above. e. Relationship and influence of the USSR (or other. foreign governments) on non-communicative signal systems, technically and operationally, of the Ministry of Defense, Armed Forces, and civil or state establishments of Sino Soviet Bloc (or other foreign) countries. - 322 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 45 --- ## Page 46 SECRET 5/62 2000 MIIIIARY (Continued) Non-communications Countermeasures Signals 2093. General: Data concerning the type and purpose of non- communications signals, means of transmission and associated operational procedures, employed to reduce the effectiveness of U.S. or allied non- communications equipment and activity. 2094 Specific: Detailed data related to the above to include: a. Precise location, organization, subordination, training, associated personality lists, and other pertinent order of battle. "b. Mission to include identification of U.S. or other.. national non-communications equipment, activity or organization on which foreign countermeasure action is concentrated. c. Scope of capability, successes achieved, techniques employed. d. Technical data providing identifying descriptions, and operating characteristics of equipment utilized. Relationship and influence of the USSR (or other. foreign governments) on countermeasure operations, and policies. Cuban Air Force - General 2095 Air Order of battle and state of readiness; including: a. Unit designations; airfield or station location and number and type of aircraft assigned. 2096 b. Flight patterns and frequency of flights. Personnel a. Air personnel strength, officer and enlisted in - 32e SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 46 --- ## Page 47 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Cuban Air Force - General (Continued) trained and trainee status by type (pilot, aircrew, groundcrew). b. Proficiency. Sources of manpower, methods of procurement. .:do General status of morale of aviation personnel. •e General attitude towards Communism and Castroism. EW/GCI Radar Order of Battle, including: number and type equipment, Location name and coordinates, function, number of officers and enlisted personnel, and period of operation for each. 2098 AAA Order of Battle, including: units, subordination, location name and coordinates; quantity and nomenclature of equipment, and number of officers and enlisted personnel for each unit; type of fire control utilized. Organizational position, command echelons and functions of aviation in the government, military structure, and in relation to the ground and naval forces. 2100 Training. Number and location of flight schools and type train- ing being given, to include number of students. b. Number and location of USSR-Sov Bloc advisors in- volved in Cuban training. c. The extent of aviation training in the sov Bloc to include; number of pilots/crews which have been or are receiving train- ing in Czechoslovakia/USSR; date of departure from Cuba. do The number of Bloc trained personnel who have re- turned to Cuba. - 32f - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 47 --- ## Page 48 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Cuban Air Force - General (Continued) 2101 Key Air Force Personnel and Biographic Information. a. List of key personnel to include: Air Commander, Chief of Staff, Deputies. b. Biographic data on above. 2102 Logistics. a. Sources for logistic support and supplies. b. Quantities of aviation fuel stocks and storage. c. Location of air depots. d. Maintenance and repair policies, procedures, methods, techniques and effectiveness. e. Availability of spare parts. •f. Aircraft serviceability rates. g.. Fuel and oxygen servicing. h. Purchase agreements with other nations involving aircraft, missiles, and related equipment or strategic materials. 2103 Means of identification. a. Describe aircraft markings. b. Unit insignia. 2104 C. Describe air force uniforms and insignia. Electronics. a. Describe communications equipment in operation and/or - 32g - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 48 --- ## Page 49 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Electronics (Continued) used by the air force. b. Is there any indication that a communications network, space vehicle tracking or electronic guidance system is being installed under the guise of other construction at or near construction sites? 2105 Ammunition Storage. a. Location name. b. Coordinates. 2106 c. Type and amount of ammunition stored. Highway Construction. 2107 Air Facilities. a. Is any new construction in progress at existing air fields? b. If so, what is the purpose of the construction? C. Are any new air fields being built? If so, please locate. .. 33 - 32h.- SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 49 --- ## Page 50 •SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Medical Facilities 2108 Hospitals: (include only the following) Military Hospitals Central Military Hospital (Finlay) in Havana Casa Blanca Military Hospital, Havana Hospital Military Castillo Duany, Santiago de Cuba Hospital Militar, Pinar del Rio Hospital Militar, Matanzas Hospital Militar, Holguin Hospital Militar, Camaguey Hospital Militar, Santa Clara Governmental Hospitals Quinta la Covadonga, Havana Quinta Benefica, Luyano Asoc. de Dep. del Comercio, Jesus del Monte Universidad Calixo Garcia, Havana Saturino Lora, Santiago de Cuba Leon Cuervo Rubio, Pinar del Rio Sta. Isabel y San Sanatian de Nicolas, Matanzas San Juan de Dios, Santa Clara Sanat. de la Col. Espanola, Cienfuegos Civil de Camaguey, Camaguey Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes, Vedado (Havana) General Freyre de Andrade, Havana Indicate bed capacity; normal bed occupancy and bed 2109 capacity. 2110 2111 of floors. 2112 elevators? 2113 Street address of hospital. Type of construction; brick, mortar, or frame; number If building is of more than one floor, are there What type, make, capacity? Is the hospital electricity from a public utilities - 321 SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 50 --- ## Page 51 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Medical Facilities (Continued) 2113 (Continued) source or from self-contained generator? If source is from public utilities, is there any emergency generator within the hospital? Quality of power (both sources), current, phase, nominal voltage, relative stability. 2114 Surface communications. Is there a paved road enter- ing the hospital area? Is the hospital physically located near a.. railroad spur, port facility, or air strip? Is there a helicopter pad In the hospital vicinity? If not, is there a suitable open area in the near vicinity? 2115 Water used by the hospital; source, adequacy, potability, type of treatment, if any. 2116 Method of waste and sewage disposal; burned,.. open ditch, hauled away, city sewerage system. 2117 Surgical capability: Number of operation rooms: b. Type of cases performed - minor surgery, chest, abdominal. make, model: autoclave. c. Type and condition of equipment, manufacture, Include tables, lights, major instruments, sterilizers, d. Method of sterilization, autoclave, boiling, chemical. e. Is electrical system extended to operating. room, 1,e., plugs for use of power equipment? 2118 Hospital laboratory capability: a. Type of tests and examinations performed.. b. Type and condition of major equipment, manu- facture, model. Include microscope, centrifuge, ovens. Are there cold storage facilities within the laboratory; capacity, type of unit, make, and model. - 32j- SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 51 --- ## Page 52 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Medical Facilities (Continued) 2118 (Continued) a. Skill level and status of training of laboratory. technicians. 2119 Blood bank capability: Size of cold storage units, type, make. Are they equipped with temperature recorders? b. Is blood drawn locally or obtained elsewhere and. stored only? c. Are refrigeration units temperature controlled, 0° -1° centigrade? d. Are compatability tests performed? 2120 X-ray capability: a. How many units are present? What size are units, milleamperage/voltage? Type, model. Are there portable X-ray machines? 2121 b. Are developing tank temperatures controlled? c. Are spare parts kept on hand? Tubes, tube heads? Communication system: a: Within hospital. b. With local community; telephone system--how extensive, reliability. 2122 Manufacturing Laboratories (civilian): a. Location. b. What products are manufactured? In what quantity? Include such items as gamma glöbulin, cathomycin, and albamycin. 32k SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 52 --- ## Page 53 S E C R 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Medical Facilities (Continued) 2122 (Continued) c. Cold storage facilities. Capacity, make and model. d. Source and details of electrical data; current, phase, nominal voltage, and relative stability. e. Facilities. Building construction and number of structures. f. Professional equipment. Type, condition, and make. g. Source and quality of water; treatment method. h. Source of raw material, local or import. 2123 Medical Depots (military) or Medical Sections of a General Depot: a. Location. b. Number of square feet of covered storage area.. c. Number and dimensions of buildings. ¿. Presence and capacity of cold storage area. of refrigeration unit, make, and model. e. Security measures in effect, i.e., pilferage.. theft. f. Surface communications: (1) Road net into depot; extent, paved. (2) Proximity to railroad, port, airfiela. Type - 32L - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 33 --- ## Page 54 SECRET 5/62 2000 MILITARY (Continued) Medical Facilities (Continued) 2123 (Continued) • ---- g. Is material handling equipment used? What type? How many machines? Capacity, make, and model. (Fork lifts, conveyors, mechanical dollies). h. Extent of medical maintenance performed: (1) What type of testing equipment present? (2) Training of repairmen/technicians.* (3) Are spare parts kept on hand or reg- uisitioned as needed? 1. Number of days' stock kept on hand. j. Throughput capability - in tons per day. k. Expansion capability. 1. Stock management system (requisition, stock control, and issue procedures.) 2124 Refrigerated Storage: Identify and locate refrigerated storage sites and/or ice plants which could be used to store and reprocess shipments of whole blood and other perishable medical items. - 32m - S ECR E T DocId: 32627026 Page 54 --- ## Page 55 SECRET 5/62 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Bloc Economic Aid (Continued) Industrialization (Continued) such as, general planning, construction scheduled, progress on construction, production planned for, and the like. 3046 Identify and locate all industrial facilities and projects completed or under construction in Cuba on the basis of assistance from Bloc countries. (Identify the Bloc country providing the assistance). Where possible, locate not only by city but also by what section of the city and near what prominent landmarks. 3047 What portion of the total cost of any project is accounted for by foreign exchange costs, i.e., cost incurred through the necessity of importing materials, equipment, and outside technical assistance? What is the nature of the Bloc aid, i.e., direct grant, credit, technical assistance; extent of cost covered by Bloc financial aid, i.e., entire cost or only foreign exchange portion of cost! 3049 For all projects where credit is involved, what are the repayment terms and interest rate? 3050 Specific projects - Using the above guidance, and the questions in paragraph 3069, report on the following: A steel plant is to be built in Cuba by the USSR. Is it planned as an integrated steel combine or a rolling mill only? The projected oil refinery at Santiago, also being built through Soviet assistance. c. The shipbuilding yard at Mariel and the ship-repair yard at Havana to be built with Polish assistance. Soviet Bloc Technical Assistance Information about technical assistance from the Bloc, its general character and scope, as well as answers to the specifics outlined below provide still another approach to assessing the Castro regime's prospects for success or failure. The general plans, their execution and changes in these, are of continuing interest. - 44 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 55 --- ## Page 56 SE CRET 5/62 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Industry (Continued) General (Continued) c. Laborers d. Foremen e. Management f. Secretaries 3066 To what extent are the industrial plants guarded by militia and where are the guards? 3067 Are there evidences of Sov-Sat technicians assisting or supervising the plants? Industrial Sectors of Interest There is a continuing interest in the major sections of the Cuban economy and the rate and general development patterns in these sections. 3068 Information is needed on the following Cuban industries in particular. (Specific questions applicable to these industries and individual facilities are listed under paragraphs 3070 and 3094). Extractive industries a. nickel-cobalt b. copper c. manganese d. chromite e. iron 3069 Manufacturing industries • a. petroleum refining (See also para. 3050) b. metallurgical (See also para. 3050) - 47 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 56 --- ## Page 57 SECRET 5/62 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Industry (Continued) Specific Information Needs on Key Industries (Continued) d. Cargo aboard. e. Dates in ports. 3128 Report any details known on Cuban trade, by commodity and volume, with both Bloc countries and non-Bloc countries. 3129 Bloc ships, specific requirements. a. Were special security precautions noted in port of arrival? b. Was the ship heavily or lightly loaded? c. Give type and quantity of cargo unloaded from ship holds; if tanks or trucks state type. d. Did the ship carry deck cargo? Give as complete a description as possible, i.e., crates the size of a semitrailer, boxcar, or automobile. (See Illustrations). e. Did the ship carry motor torpedo boats on deck and was the ship towing any type of craft? Civil Air 3130 Report sales of Bloc transport aircraft to Cuba. 31301 Total number of civil aircraft by types indicating those currently operational. 31302 Civil aviation personnel strength by categories - i.e. (a) jet pilots, (b) multi-engined pilots, (c) single-engined pilots; (a) engineers, (e) radio operators, (f) stewards; ground personnel: (a) professional and administrative, (b) mechanics and other skilled ground crews, (c) clerical and unskilled personnel. 31303 Established air corridors and civil airways, including schedules and routes of all domestic air services. - 55 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 57 --- ## Page 58 SECRET 5/62 ( 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Civil Air (Continued) 31304 Flight traffic control and communications facilities including meteorological services or other aids to air navigation 31305 Number and location of training schools and aero clubs. 31306 Foreign airlines operating in Cuba including types of aircraft used, flight numbers, frequencies, and routes. 3131 and any Bloc country. Report information on civil air agreements between Cuba 3132 Cuba or beyond. Report information on operations of Bloc airlines to 31321 Airline agreements or pooling arrangements involving Cuban carriers or affecting Cuban services. 31322 CUBANA maintenance facilities including their availability to other carriers, domestic or foreign. 31323 Other maintenance facilities available to civil air operators plus fuel supplies and services. 31324 for civil air administration. Governmental controlling agency or organizational structure 31325 Aviation laws, Licensing requirements, etc. 31326 Principal personalities: -(1) Government administrators; (2) Airline officials; (3) Biographies of above. 31327 Means of identification: (1) aircraft markings; (2) uniforms of airline personnel. Local Level (Whenever personalities are mentioned obtain as complete a biographic sketch as possible). 3133 Automobile a. Who are the outstanding garage men in your area? Most trusted? - 55a SE CRET DocId: 32627026 Page 58 --- ## Page 59 SECRET 5/62 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Industry (Continued) Communications Industry Microwave radio relay National Level 3170 Describe the operation and facilities for microwave radio relay of the Red Oficial de Comunicaciones por Microondas (ROCMI) network. a. Allocation of channels, 1.e., military, commercial, etc. b. List of routing indicators and abbreviations. c. Location of stations Installed after RCA completed Its initial installation. d. Location of equipment within Havana, particularly point of entry of microwave signal into Havana. e. How traffic is routed on microwave. f. Use and identification of cover names. &. Information concerning communications operating courses and nets. 3171 How many telephone channels are in use on this network and what, If any, are the plans to enlarge the network? 3172 What are the nationalities of the technicians operating this network? 3173 What is the current operating status of the Ministerio de Comunicaciones network? 3174 Who are the users of this network (military, militia, other ministries, etc.)? 3175 What are the major operating difficulties? 3176 What is the operational status and identification of the VHF and UHF stations connecting to the ROCMI network? - 62 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 59 --- ## Page 60 SECRET 5/62 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Industry (Continued) Communications Industry (Continued) Telephone System (Continued) National Level (Continued) 3188 Describe the present quality of local and long- distance service. 3189 How much of the open wirelines has been replaced by cable? Where? What kind of cable was used? Was the cable buried? If any repeater stations are used along a cable route, where are they located? 3190 Are there any plans for the use of direct long- distance dialing? Local Level 3191 Where are the telephone offices in yours and in surrounding cities? 3192 Are they automatic exchanges or are all calls handled by operators? 3193 Are the telephone offices guarded? How? 3194. Are there pay phones in these cities? 3195 Did the withdrawal of coinage affect the use of these? 3196 List all remembered local telephone numbers. (Friends, Important people, Businesses, Militia, Fire department, City offices, etc.) 3197 Where are the telephone exchange transfers, vaults, substations (especially in smaller towns) located? 3198 What is the estimated number of telephones in your area? 3199 Are telephones in good repair? - 64 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 60 --- ## Page 61 SECRET 5/62 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Industry (Continued) Communications Industry (Continued) Telephone System (Continued) Local Level (Continued) 3200 Does subject know anyone in the telephone business, civil or military? a. Operators b. Linemen c. Repairmen 3201 Give complete data on any other aspects of the telephone system with which source is familiar. Telegraph. System Comment on the status of modernization of the Cuban Telegraph system for such things as: a. Installation of new wirelines. b. The switching of traffic from open wirelines to microwave radio relay. c. The location of and equipment used in point-to- point radio facilities for passing telegraph traffic and the extent of such use by the Institute Nacional de la Reforma Agraria (INRA).. a. The progress in establishing domestic Telex networks and any plans for establishing international Telex connections. Radio and Television National Level 3203 What is the operational status of the main radio broadcasting and television studio in Havana? - 65 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 61 --- ## Page 62 7) SECRET 5/62 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Industry (Continued) Communications Industry (Continued) Radio and Ielevision (Continued) National Level (Continued) 32031 When did Cuba begin broadcasting to other countries over Radio Havana? 32032 Who is in charge of Radio Havana and who are his assistants? 32033 Give the names of anyone else connected with Radio Havana and tell what they do and where their political sympathies lie. 32034 Where are the studios of Radio Havana located? Where are the transmitters? •32035 Are any of Radio Havana's announcers and/or technicians from tron Curtain countries? 32036 In what language does Radio Havana broadcast? Will any new languages be added in the future? 32037 Radio Havanais used by various dissident groups. such as the Guatemalan Information Cormittee to beam subversive programs to specific countries. Who controls these groups? Can they broadcast what they wish or are they merely "front" groups organized to give the programs an aura of authenticity? S - 65a - ECR E T DocId: 32627026 Page 62 --- ## Page 63 SECRET 5/62, 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Industry (Continued) Communications Industry (Continued) Radio and Television (Continued) National Level (Continued) 3204 What is the status of the new international radio. broadcasting station under construction at Bauta near Havana? 3205 What are the number and types of transmitters in- stalled at the Bauta station and to what extent is the station operated by Cuban or Bloc personnel? 3206 What government entity is responsible for the selection and preparation of radio and television programs? What is the degree of Bloc involvement in such programming? 3207 What are the plans for extending coverage of international radio broadcasting service? 32071 Is it true that Radio Havana actually has few listeners Do many people write to Radio Havana reporting on in Latin America? reception? 32072 Are the programs of the Havana station called The English School of the Air beamed to the United States or are they intended solely for Cuba? Does the director of Radio Havana also direct The English School of the Air? 32073 What can you tell us about the Radio Havana announcer. named Barbara Collins? Is Robert Williams on the staff of Radio Havana? Is Marge McCurdy an announcer for Radio Havana? 32074 How many transmitters does Radio Havana have? What are the powers of the transmitters? How do programs reach the transmitters from the studios? 32075 Does Radio Havana have a monitoring section to listen to broadcasts from other countries? If so, describe the section giving number of personnel employed, language capabilities, which countries and stations are monitored, what type of equipment is used, location, etc. = 66 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 63 --- ## Page 64 SECRET 5/62 3000 ECONOMIC (Continued) Industry (Continued) Communications Industry (Continued) Radio and Television (Continued) National Level (Continued) 32076 What security precautions are taken at the Radio Havana studios? Describe the studios, and if possible, draw a rough diagram of the floor plan of the studios. Local Level 3208 What are the most popular radio and television programs? 3209 Estimate the number of television sets in the area. 3210 Estimate the total radio and television audience. 3211 What is the quality of radio and television reception. 3212 Which radio and television personalities. are the most and the • least popular? 3213 What radio programs from foreign areas are popular? 3214 How much communist cultural material is broadcast? What is the most effective type of communist propaganda? What is the general reaction to this type of broadcast? - 66a - SECREI DocId: 32627026 Page 64 --- ## Page 65 SHERET 4000 GEOGRAPHIC Detailed information on local conditions is required for certain priority areas. This settion is designed to provide guidance for exploitation of a person's knowledge of local conditions. It should be used as an adjunct to the preceding functional and technical sections. Sources from Guane and Clenfuegos areas should be interrogated in the greatest detail on local conditions as wellias on their occupational specialty. Sources with knowledge of the following areas also should be given precedence in processing for this type of information. (Pinar del Rio Province): (Havana Province): (Matanzas Province) : (Las Villas Province) : (Camaguey Province): (Oriente Province): Guane and Esperanza Havana Matanzas, Colon Calbarien, sancti Spiritus; Santa Clara Moron, Camaguey, Nuevitas, Santa Cruz del Sur, Florida Puerto Padre, Gibara, Mayari, Holguin, Baracoa, Santiago del Cuba, Manzanillo Physical Setting Persons who have lived in an area and who have spent time in the out-of-doors can provide unique information related to movement across local terrain. The following questions are a guide to developing informa- tion on local terrain conditions. Relief and Drainage 4001 Describe trails in your area. What is the normal amount of traffic using them? 4002 Describe and locate fords across streams, including the steepness and composition of the stream banks, type and density. of vegetation, depth and swiftness of the strean. 4003 Are there any caves that could be used for hiding or caching supplies? Can sink-holes be used for the same purpose? Water Supply 4004 What are the local supplies of water? -82 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 65 --- ## Page 66 SECRET 5/62 5000 FACTORY MARKINGS Valuable intelligence information on the Soviet Bloc can be obtained from the study of factory markings appearing on equipment produced in the BLOC. Of particular interest are serial numbers and other markings on Soviet Bloc aircraft, artillery, motor vehicles (including trucks, prime movers, etc., and scientific equipment of all types:) Also all material of Naval interest such as, communications equipment, sonar, ordnance, ASW (including mines, torpedoes, depth charges, ahead thrown weapons, etc.), propulsion machinery, Hover and Hydrofoil craft, pharmaceutical and medical supplies and equipment, etc. 5001 (Exploitation opportunities) Minimum markings exploitation of each piece of equipment and itsscomponents would include: a. Type designation b. Serial number c. Date of production d. Manufacturer These data usually are available on nameplate or stamped into the metal parts of equipment. Documents, especially technical passports or logbooks, are a valuable source because of the exact production dates therein. If the data include unfamiliar characters such as Cyrillic or Chinese, an approximation of the type designation, (that is familiar letters and numbers) often is enough to establish the product type and manufacturer where information is available from other sources. Obviously, considerable attention to accuracy of serial number and date information is necessary. Collection by photography is preferred, if practicable; physical impressions by clay, tape or overlay pencil rubbings next; and lacking this, accurately hand-copied data can be used. 5002 (Interrogation opportunities) Does source recall any numbers and/or letter number combinations stenciled or stamped on Bloc equipment in Cuba? Any supporting photographs or similar materials should be forwarded with reporting. - 115 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 66 --- ## Page 67 SE CRET 5/62 8000. ANNEXES A. Selected List of Cuban Industrial Organizations and Plants B.. Map and List of Electric Power Stations c. List of Cuban Sugar Mills (includes new names where known) S R E DocId: 32627026 Page --- ## Page 68 SECRET ANNEX C Cuban Sugar Mills ( Former Name New Name 1. Andreita 2. Manuelita 3. Adelaida Patria 5. Punta Alegre 6. Violeta 7: San German 8. Fajardo 9. Toledo 10. Providencia 11. Guipuzcoa Mal Tiempo City & Province Cruces, L.V. 14 July Palmira, L.V. Enrique Varona Gonzalez Patria 0 Muerte Falla, Moron, C. Moron, C. Maximo Gomez Punta de San Juan, C. Primero de Cupeyes, Moron C. Enero Urbano Noris San Germain, O. CDIE. Manuel Fajardo San Antonia de Los Banos, H. Manuel Martinez Prieto Marianao, H. Osvaldo Sanchez Guines, H. Esteban Hernandez Marti, M.. C-1 SECR ET Coordinates 22-18N 80-16w 22-15N 80-31W 22-10N 78-50W 22-06N 78-38W 22-24N 78-46W 21-57N 78-27W 20-37N 76-09W 22-50N 82-27W 23-03N 82-25W 22-48N 82-02W 22-58N 80-57W DocId: 32627026 Page 68 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 2,722 6,237 14,309 2,551 6,237 8,289 7,598 1,701 5,103 2,835 3,175 --- ## Page 69 SECRET ( Former Name New Name 12. Santa Isabel 13. Trinidad F.N.T.A. 14. Zaza 15. Fe 16. Corazon de Jesus 17. Ulacia 18. Cunagua 19. Jaronu 20. Alava 21. Conchita 22. Mercedes .23. Lugareno 24. Moron City & Province Fomento, L.V. Trinidad, I.V. Placetas, L.V. José Maria Camajuani, L.V. Pérez Mariana Grajales Carlos Sitecito (Sagua), L.V. Rodrigo, I.V. Balino Bolivia Cunagua, C. Brasil Jaronu (Esmeralda), Mexico Banaguises, M. Puerto Alacranes, M. Rico Libre Seis de Agosto Sierra de Cubitas Manguito, M. Lugareno, C. Ciro :: Redondo Pina, C. c-2 SECRET Coordinates 22-06N 79-44W 21-50N 79-50W 22-17W 78-38W 22-26N 79-42W. 22-44N 80-04W 22-4IN- 80-12W 22-05N 78-20W 21-51N 77-58W .22-47N 80-49W 22-45N 81-32W 22-38N 80- 52W. 21- 33N, 77-29W 22-01N/ 78-44W - DocId: 32627026 Page 69 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 2,608 2,381 2,381 3,402 2,155 2,381 :9,526 12,836 4,763 4,002 3,856 6,237 11,340 --- ## Page 70 SECRET Former Name New Name 25. Stewart Venezuela 26. Cuba 27. Santo Domingo 28. Es pana 29. Alto Cedro 30. Palma 31. Santa Ana 32. Miranda 33: Jatibonico 34. Jobabo 35. Mercedita 36. Chaparra 37. Delicias 38. La Vega City & Province Simon Reyes, C. Cuba Libre' Pedro Betancourt, M. Juan Avila Union de Reyes, M. Espana Perico, M. Republicana Loynaz Marcane, O. Hechevarria Dos Rios Chile Palma Soriano, 0. Azua (San Luis) 0. Julio A. Mella Uruguay Miranda, 0. Jatibonico, C. Peru Jobabo, 0. Augusto Cesar Sandino Cabanas, P. de R. Jesus Menendez Puerto Padre, O. Antonio Guiteras Puerto Padre, 0. Humberto Abrad Guayos, L. V. 0-3 SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 70 Coordinates . 21-44N 78-48W 22- 45N 81-18W 22-51N 81-30W 22-49N 81-01W 20-35N 75-58W 20-14N. 76-01W 20-16N 75-54W 20-23N 75-55W 21-55N 79-12W 20-50N 77-18W 22-59N 82-55W 21-10N 76-29W 21-11N 76-34E 22-030 79-28W 5/62. Cane Grinding Capacity M .tons per 24 hours 9,922 5,670 2,528 6,600 3,062 4,536 2,495 5,670 5,103 5,103 2,041 8,062 9,752 1,701 --- ## Page 71 SECRET 39. Former Name New Name Tuinucu 40. Cespedes City & Province Sancti Spiritus, I. V. Carlos Cespedes, C. Manuel de Cespedes -41. Elia Colombia 42. Francisco Elia (Guairmaro), C. Guayabal, C. 43. Manati Amancio Rodriguez Argelia Libre Dumanecos, 0. 44. San Francisco Marta Cruces, L. V. Abreu 45. Algodones Orlando Majagua, C. Gonzalez 46. Baguanos Lopez Pena Cueto, O. 47. Tacajo 48. Agramonte 49. Estrella Fernando de Dios Igancio Agranonte Republica Dominicana Cueto, 0. Forida, C. Cespedes, C. 50. Vertientes Panama Vertientes, C. 51. Isabel (Jamaica) 52. Los Canos Honduras Jamaica, 0. Paraguay Arroy Hondo, 0. C-4 SECRET Coordinates 21-59N 79-26W 21-35N 78-17W 21-OIN 77-25W 20-49N 77-35W 21-18N 76-55W 22-22N 80-14W 21-52N 78-59W 20-46N 76-03W 20-5IN 76-00W 21-31N 78-14W 21-36N 78-18W 21-19N 78-12W 20-11N 75-06W 20-03N 75-08W DocId: 32627026 Page 71 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 4,536 4,356 6,010 7,450 9,639 1.928 3,402 3,742 3,742 4,536 4,736 8,992 1,814 2,041 --- ## Page 72 SECRET 53. Former Name New Name Soledad City & Province El Salvador Guantanamo, O. 54. Andorra 55. Australia 56. Zorrilla 57. Maria Antonia 58. Purio 59. San Pablo 60. Washington 61. El Pilar 62. San Cristobal Abraham Lincoln Artemisa, P de R. Jaguey Grande, M. Mario Munoz 26 July Los Arabos, M. Santo Domingo, I. V. Perucho Calabazar, I. V. Figueredo Zulueta, L. V. Camilo Manacas, I. V. Cienfuegos Eduardo Garcia Artemisa, P de R. Lavandero Jose Marti San Cristobal P de R 63. Hershey Camilo Santa Cruz Del Cienfuegos Norte, H. 64. Rosario Ruben Aguacate, F. Martinez Villena 65. San Antonio Boris Luis Madruga, F. Santa Colona C-5 SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 72 Coordinates 20-13N 75-13W 22-48N 82-49W 22-31N 81-06W 22-46N 80- 38W 22-33N 80-42w 22-40N 79-52W 22-21N 79-36W 22-35N 80-18W 22-51N 82-46W 22-41N 83-01W 23-08N 81-57W 22-40N 82-03W 22-55N 81-52W 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 2,495 2,495 2,619 1,928 907 2,268 1,701 3,629 3,062 3,402 7,371 2,381 3,027 --- ## Page 73 SECRET Former Name New Name 66. Araujo Reinöld Garcia City & Province Manguito, M. 67. Tinguaro Sergio Gonzalez Pericos, M. 68. Escambray Fomento, I. V. 69. Perseverancia Primero Real Campina, de Mayo L. V. 70. Cape Cruz Luis Enrique Ensenade de Mora Carracedo 0. 71. Niquero Niquero, O. 72. Tanamo Frank Pais Cayo Mambi, 0. 73. Constancia 74. Portugalete Elpirio Gomez Encrucijada, I. V. Palmira, L. V. 75. Unidad 76. Amistad Calabaza de Sagua, L. V. Amistad de Guines, H. Los Pueblos 77• Gomez Mena Hector Molina San Nicolas, H. 78. Mercedita Gregorio Arlee Manalich Melena del Sur, F. Coordinates 22-36N. 80-54W 22-47N 80-57W 22-07N 79-45W 22-24N 80-45W 19-54N 77-19W 20-03N 77-35W 20-41N 75-15W 22-35N 79-52W 22-17N 80-25W 22-4IN 80-01W 22-51N 82-00W 22-46N 81-53W 22-50N 82-0.9W C-6 SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 73 (14) 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 2,619 4,536 1,814 4,536 2,041 3,402 3,969 2,495 2,177 1,928 2,880 6,804 3,969 --- ## Page 74 SECRET Former Name New Name 79. Resolucion Jose R. Riquelmg 80. Baragua. (Ciego de Avila) 81. Florida Ecuador City & Province Quemados de Guines, I. V. Ciego de Avila, C. Argentina Florida, C. 82. Marcareno Haiti Manopla, C. 83. : Constancia Abreu, L. V. 84. Covadonga Antonio Sanchez Carreno, I. V. 85. Hormiguero Espartaco San Fernando de Camarones, L. V. 86. Parque Alto Batalla de Rodas, L. V. Peralejo 87. Pastora Osvaldo Herrera 88. San Agustin Ramon Balboa San Juan de Los Yeras, I. V. Santa Isabel de las Lajas, I. V. 89. Boston Nicaragua Banes, 0. 90. Preston Guatemala Preston, 0. 91. Bahia Honda Harlem Bahia Honda P de R 92. La Francia Sierra Maestra Los Palacios P de R C-7 SECRET Coordinates 22-50N C0-20W 21-42N 78- 39W 21- 33N 78-15W 20-43N 77-52W 22-14N 80-34W 22-17N 80- 51W 22-15N 80-20W 22-22N 80-29W 22-18N 80-04W 22-21N 80-18W 20- 54N 75-43W 20-47N 75-39W 22-55N 83-12W 22-31N 83-14W DocId: 32627026 Page 74 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 1,814 7,371 3,402 3,865. 4,536 3,526 4,309 1,928 2,654 3,470 : 7,938 9,185 2,381 2,608 --- ## Page 75 SECRET Former Name New Name 93. Niagara Manuel Sanguily City & Province Consolacion del Norte P de R 94. Orozco 95. San Ramon Pablo de Cabanas, P de R la Torriento Brau Orlando Mariel, P de R Nodarse 96. Havana Havana Libre Cainito, H. 97. Josefita Manuel Nueva Paz, H. Isla 98. Occidente Pablo Quivican, H. Noriega 99. Portugalete Liberacion San Jose de Las Lajas, H. - 100. Carolina Gramma Coliseo, M. 101. Dolores Jaime Lopez Pedro Betancourt, 102. Dos Rosas Fumerto Alvarez Cardenas, M. 103. Elena Canasi, M. 104. Limones 105. Porfuerza Fructoso Limonar, M. Rodriguez Jesus Rabi Calimete, M. 106. Progreso Jose Smith Mendez Carote, C-8 SE C REI Coordinates 22-50N 83-31W 22-57N 83-02W 22-58N 82-47W 23-01N 82-37W 22-46N 81-45W 22-48N - 82-24W 23-00N 82-13W 22-55N 81-16W 22-49N 81-17W 23-05N 81-18W 23-02N 81-43W 22-54N 81-25W 22-33N 80-51W 22-59N 81-11W DocId: 32627026 Page 75 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 1,542 3,084 2,381 1,701 1,814 907 2,041 2,551 1,588 1,746 907 2,495 2,937 3,062 --- ## Page 76 SECRET Former Name 107. Puerto New Name Puerto Libre City & Province Canasi, M. 108. San Ignacio Agramonte, M. 109. Santa Amalia 110. Santa Rita I11. Soledad 112. Triunfo 113. Adela 114. Amazonas 115. Caracas 116. Carmita 117. Fidencia 118. Macagua 119. Narcisa 120: Natividad William Soler Victoria de Coliseo, M. Yagujay Baro, Agramonte, M. Julio Reyes Jovellanos, M. Mario Nunez Limonar, M. Remedios, Lo ,V. Hiram Rojas Sancti Spiritus, L. V. Ciudad Caracas Santa Isabel de las Lajas, L. V. Vega Alta, L. V. Fidencia, L. V. Mata, L. V. Yuguajay, L. V. 7 de Noviembre Sancti Spiritus, L. V. C-9 SECRET Coordinates 23-07N 81-47W 22-40N 81-07W 22-55N 81-17W 22-41N 81-00W 22-49N 81-09W 22-59N 81-21W 22-23N 79-32W 21- 40N 79-26W 22-23N 80-16W 22- 30N 79-49W 22-21N 79-40W 22-36N 79-58W 22-20N 79-17W 21-39N 79-29W DocId: 32627026 Page 76 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M. tons per 24 hours 1,474 1,701 2,551 2,268- 2,767 1,928 2,722 1,701 3,969 1,984 2,495 1,814 3,969 1,928 --- ## Page 77 43. SEC RET Former Name New Name 121. Nazabal Emilio Cordova 122. Nela Obdulio Morales Torres 123: Ramona 124. Reforma Marcelo Salado 125. Resulta Antonio Finalet 126. San Agustin Ramon Balboa 127. San Isidro 128. San Jose Hermanos Ameijerias 129. Santa Catalina Carlos Caraballo 130. Santa Lutgarda E1 Vaguerito 131. Santa Maria Efrain Alfonso 132. Santa Rosa 10 de Octubre 133. Santa Teresa Santa Teresa Libre City & Province Encrucijada, L...V. Mayajigua, L. V.' Rancho Veloz, L. V. Caibarien, L. V. Sagua La Grande, L. V. Remedios, L. V. Quemados de Guines, I. V. Placetas, L. V. Cruces, L. V. Mata, L. V. Ranchuello, L. V. Ranchuello, L. V. Sitiecito, L. V. Coordinates 22-45N 79-44W 22-18N 79-06W 22-52N 80-21W 22- 30N 79-30W. 22-48N 80- 03W 22-21N 80-18W 22-47N 80-17W 22-19N 79-36W 22-23N 80-13W 22- 39N 79-58W. 22-22N 80-11W 22-22N 80-07W 22- 48N 80-06W C.- 10 SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 77 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 2,835 1,928 4,423 2,551 2,835 2,722 2,722 2,891 2, 722 2,381 2,438 2,347 3,402 --- ## Page 78 ine, 134. Former Name Soledad 135. Vitoria 136. Najasa 137. Santa Marta 138. Senado 139. Siboney 140. Algodonal 141. America 142. Baitony 143. Borjita 144. Сасосит 145. Dos Amigos 146. Ermita DocId: 32627026 Page 78 SECRET City & New Name Province Pepito Tey Cienfuegos, L. V. Coordinates 22-07N 80-20W Alfredo Alvarez Mola Candido Gonzolez Noel Fernandez Salvador Rosales America Libre LOS Reinaldos Paquito Rosales Cristino Naranjo Françisco Castro Ceruto Yaguajay, I. V. Hatuey, C. Santa Marta, C. Senado, C. Marchena, C. El Cristos, O. Contramaestre, 0. Almeida, O. Dos Camines, 0. Cacocum, 0. Campechuela, O. Costa Rica Near Guantanamo, 0. 22-20N 79-15W 21-13N 77-33W 20- 48N 78-01W 21-34N 77-37W 21-16N 77-39W 20-09N 75-45W 20-15N 76-15W 20-11N 75-29W 20-12N 75-47W 20-45N 76-23W 20-14N 77-18W 20- 11N 75-24W C-11 SECR 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 2,551 2,495 2,268 4,536 5,103 2,041 1,826 2,631 5,103 2,722 2,381 1,474 1,814 --- ## Page 79 SECRET Former Name New Name 147• Esperanza Argeo Martinez City & Province Guantanamo, O. 148. Estrada Palma 149. Isabel 150. Mabay 151. Maceo 152. Rio Cauto 153. Romelie Bartolome Maso Xava, O: Marquez Juan Media Luna, 0. Manuel Mar quez Arquimedes Julia Bayamo, Colina Antunez Antonio Cacocum, O. Maceo Jose M. Rio Cauto, 0. Figueredo Hector Infante Yateras, GGuantanamo, 0. 154. Salvador Calicito, O. 155. San Antonio Manuel Tames 156. San Ramon Yateras, Guantanamo, 0. • San Ranon, 0. 157. Santa Cecilia Jorge Prieto 158. Santa Lucia Rafael Freire Torres Coordinates 20-12N 75-10W 20- 10N 76-5TW 20÷08N 77-27W 20- 21N 76-47W 20-45N 76-29W 20- 32N 76-56W 20- 10N 75.-05W 20-17N 77-14W 20-09N 75-03W 20-13N 77-22W 20-08N 75-08W 21-03N 76-02W 5/62 Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 2,268 3,175 3,402 2,551 2,041 4,536 1,701 2,155 1,588 2,268 (Converted to chicken farm) 1,701 4,196 Near Guantanamo, 0. Santa Lucia, 0. C-12 S. E CRET DocId: 32627026 Page 79 --- ## Page 80 SECRET 5/62 159. 160. Sofia 161. Union Former Name New Name Santa Regina Enidio Diaz Machado Ranulfo Leiva Rafael Reyes City 8e Province Ceiba Fuega, 0. Sofia, Bayano, 0. San Luis, O. Cane Grinding Capacity M tons per 24 hours 2,268 Coordinates 20-13N 77-20W 20-19N 76-58W 20-12N 75-51W 2,041 1,928 C-13 SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 80 --- ## Page 81 SECRET ANNEX K 24222 NPIC REPORTS This annex contains extracts from NPIC publications such as the Mission Coverage Index (MCI) and the Situation Summary (SITSUM). The annex is arranged alphabetically by geographic area. Within each area the information is reported chronologically. This informa- tion was widely disseminated throughout the intelligence community, including some 50 U. S. domestic and overseas installations. The first figure appearing in each extract refers to the mission number, and the date is the date of overflight. SECRET DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13526, SEC. 3.5 NLK-10-120 BYMAD NARA. Date 12/13 DocId: 32627026 Page 81 --- ## Page 82 DocId: 32627026 Page 82 -ANNEX NPIC Reports ALTO CEDRO AREAR ARIILLERY TRAINING SITE CU 2027N 87558H 3078 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS 3 NM SOUTH OF ALTO CEORO AND CENTERED AROUNO COVERS APPROXIMATELY 25-38 SO MI. NUMEROUS AW POSITIONS, PERSONNEL TRENCHES, AND FA POSITIONS, NUMEROUS BARRACKS IN WOODED AREAS ALONG STREAM BEDS. 15 FA PIECES JUST EAST OF SABARA. 18 CAMOUFLAGEO PROBABLE FA PIECES ONE NM EAST OF SABARA. APPROXIMATELY I& TRUCKS IN AREA EAST OF SABARA. LANDING STRIP ZIPOO X TO FT ORIENTEO NNE/SSH IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF SABARA. PUSSIELE LANDING STRIP 12,408 X 130 FII ORIENTEO NWISE UNCER CONSTRUCTION 1.5 NM SW OF SABARA. 138 ETI ORIENTED NWISE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. 1.5 NM SOUTHWEST OF SABANA. SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS AT LEAST 9 ADDITIONAL 6 GUN FLA POSITIONS (UNOCCUPIED) NOTEO SINCE MAY 62= NO MISSILE ACTIVITY. --- ## Page 83 DocId: 32627026 Page 83 ANTON RECIO AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION CU 3683 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS NM NORTH OF ANTON RECIO, AT UTM GRID TIQNO 485537 PAMS SERIES E7Z3, SHEET 408211. 2 BUILDINGS AND SEVERAL UNOCCUPIEO EMPLACEMENTS. 9 CANVAS-COVERED PROBABLE I8 TRUCKS PARKED IN AREA. 3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS •T NM NORTH OF ANTON RECIO. INSTALLATION CONTAINS 2 PROBABLE BARRACKS, ONE PROBABLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING, AND 8 HUTS. GROUND-CLEARING ACTIVITY IN AREA. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 9 CANVAS-COVERED TANKS, AND & TRUCKS. •-.. --- ## Page 84 DocId: 32627026 Page 84. BAHIA HONDA, PORT FACILITIES CU 2255N 083114 3IOT STTSUM T4 OCT 62 REPORTS VESSELS - ONE FREIGHTER. UNIDENTIFTED EQUIPMENT IN PORT AREA. A SECURED STORAGE AREA ON PUNTA GERARDO CONTAINS AT LEAST 25 PIECES OF UNTOENTIFTEO EQUIPMENT. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION• --- ## Page 85 DocId: 326 Page 85 Parame BAHIA HONDA SAM STTE G-3888, 29 AUG 62 REPORTS. & NM NW OF BAHTA HONDA AT 22-57-32N 883-17-28W. SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. FOUR UNREVETTED LAUNCH POSITIONS COMPLETEO AND 2 UNDER CONSTRUCTION. TWO LAUNCHERS ARE NET-COVERED. FRÜIT SET RADAR IS PRESENT AND SURROUNDEO BY VERTICAL NETTING. SIX VANS AND & MISSILE TRANSPORTERS ARE PRESENT AND NET COVERED. APPROXIMATELY IS TENTS AND 1S VEHICLES IN AREA. 3101 SITSUM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS MISSILE LAUNCHERS AND GUIDANCE AREA ARE NOW REVETTED. NO OTHER APPARENT CHANGE SINCE LATE AUG 62. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. CU 2257N 083174 --- ## Page 86 DocId: 32627026 Page 86 BANES AREA, PORT FACILITIES CU. 2855N 87542W1 3100 SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS VESSELS -- 2 PF-TYPE SHIPS MOORED AT BANES PIER. GROUND SCRAPED CLEAR IN SE SECTION OF BANES PORT. APPROXIMATELY 15 PIECES OF UNTOENTIFIED EQUIPMENT. PORT AREA• INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. --- ## Page 87 DocId: 32627026 Page 87 BANES • AREA PROBAULE ELECTRONICS SITE 6-3788. 62 REPORTS. NM ENE OF BANES. SITE CONTAINS 2 LARGE AND 2 SMALL REVETMENTS EQUIPMENT, ADDITIONAL GENERATOR OR VEHICLE REVETMENTS, AND ABOUT 38 TENTS. CU 2058N 075381 --- ## Page 88 DocId: 326 27026 Page 88 BANES CRUISE-MISSILE SITE CU 2858N 07539W G- 3888, 29 AUG 62 REPORTS. • NA ENE OF BANES AT 20-58-S0N 875-38-10W. SAM LAUNCH AND RADAR EQUIPMENT STORED IN OPEN AREA ADJACENT TO PROBABLE ELECTRONICS FACILITY. EQUIPMENT -- B MISSILE TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERS. 7 ELECTRONICS VANS AND 20 MISCELLANEDUS VEHICLES. 3093 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS THE FOLLOWING MAJOR CHANGES NOTED SINCE LATE AUG 62 -- CONSIDERABLE PROGRESS IN SITE CONSTRUCTION IS EVIDENT. LAUNCH AREA KEVETMENTS APPEAR COMPLETE, AND SITE IS OPERATIONAL. A PROBABLE MISSILE IS LOCATEO ON THE NORTH LAUNCHER. SEVEN CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE TRANSPORTERS AND ONE EMPTY TRANSPORTER ARE PRESENT. TWO ADDITIONAL RECTANGULAR REVETMENTS ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION OPPOSITE VEMICLE PARKING AREA• THO NEWLY CONSTRUCTEO MISSILE- HOLO REVETMENTS, ONE OF WHICH IS OCCUPIED, ARE DIRECTLY BEHINO EACH LAUNCHER. A NEW REVETMENT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION ADJACENT TO THE OCCUPIED MISSILE-HOLO REVETMENT. ALL PREVIOUSLY REPORTED REVETMENTS LOCATED THE LAUNCHERS NOW APPEAR OCCUPIED. SIRA SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS THE FOLLOWING CHANGES NOTEO SINCE LATE SEP 62 -- TWO NEW REVETMENTS ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN FRONT OF AND BETWEEN THE LAUNCH POSITIONS. AREAS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION NOTEO DIRECTLY WEST OF TENT AREA. THE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED PRODABLE MISSILE ON THE NORTH LAUNCHER IS NOW CANVAS-COVERED. --- ## Page 89 DocId: 32627026 Page 89 CAMAGUEY AREA, LITARY AREA 3965 SITSUM 2 FEB 62 REPORTS LOCATEO 6O5 MILES SE OF CAMAGUEY. A FENCEO MILITARY AREA SERVED BY AN ALL- WEATHER. Z-LANE ROAD. CONTAINS 3 BARRACKS, BUILDINGS, AND 1 BUILDING UNDER CCMSTRUCTION• ALSO 3 OCCUPIED LIGHT IPOSS 37. MMS ANTIAIRCRAFT ARTILLERY EMPLACEMENTS AND PARKED HOWITZERS (POSS 122 MMI. CU 2120N 077400 --- ## Page 90 DocId: 32627026 Page 90 CAMAGUEY AREA, MILITARY AREA 3065 SITSUM 2 FEB 62 REPORTS LOCATEO 5.5 MILES SE OF CAMAGUEY AND 4 MILES § OF CAMAGUEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. APPEARS CAPABLE OF CONTAINS 4 ACCORMODATING APPROX 165 MEN BUTLDINGS ANO BARRACKS, 3 ADMIN NUMEROUS STORAGE/SUPPORT PARTIALLY OBSCURED BY VEGETATION IN THE AREA. 5 SMALL EXCAVATIONS SIMILAR TO THOSE IN THE TRACKEO VEHICLE PARK AT SANTA CLARA. NO EVIDENCE OF VEHICLE ACTIVITY ARE DISCERNIBLE. AREA 15 DEFENDED BY 2-LIGHT ANTIAIRCRAFT ARTILLERY GUNS. CU 2121N 07750W --- ## Page 91 DocId: 32627026 Page 91 CAMAGUEY AREA, MILITARY ACTIVITY 3071 MCT 15 MAR 62 REPORTS 4.6 NMESE OF CENTER OF CAMAGUEY. ONE T-SHAPED BUILDING. 6 GABLE-ROOFEO BUILDINGS, 4 OUG-OUT REVETMENTS, AND AW POSITIONS IN SMALL WOODEO AREA AT 21-21 45N 077-50-45W• CU 212IN 07750W --- ## Page 92 DocId: 32627026 Page 92 €. CAMAGUEY AREAT MILITARY INSTALLATION 3078 NCT MAY 62 REPORTS NM ESE OF CAMAGUEY. SARRACKS-TYPE BUILDINGS, 2 STORAGE BUTLOINGS, NUMEROUS TRENCHES ANO AN POSITIONS EAST BARRACKS CU 2122N 07747W --- ## Page 93 DocId: 32627026 Page 93 CAMAGUEY AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION CU 2117N 078014 3478 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS APPROXIMATELY 8 NM SWOF CAMAGUEY ON ROUTE: 5-39. MILITARY AREA CONTAINING RANCH BUILDINGS, 4 POSSIBLE BARRACKS. 3 EXCAVATED VEHICLE SHELTERS, AND NUMERGUS WEAPONS EMPLACEMENTS WHICH APPEAR TO BE UNOCCUPIEO. A GOOD INTERNAL ROAD NETWORK IS ALSO PRESENT. VEHICLES -- IO CARGO VEHICLES. --- ## Page 94 DocId: 32627026 Page 94 C2007 CAMAGUEY AREA. MILITARY INSTALLATION CU 2123N 07756H 3070 KCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS 2.5 NM WNW OF ROUNDHOUSE AT RAILROAD YARDS. MILITARY AREA CONTAINING 5 ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS OF WHICH 3 ARE TWO-STORIED, BARRACKS, ONE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/STORAGE BUILDING, A THEATER, GYMNASIUM, AND 7 UNIDENTIFIED BUILDINGSI A MICROWAVE STATION IS ALSO PRESENT: VEHICLES -- 12 BUSES. 3979 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS STRONG POINT LOCATED 21-20-BON 877-49-204 CONTAINS 4 GABLE-ROOFED BUILDINGS ANO 2 UNOCCUPIED AAA EMPLACEMENTS SURROUNDEO NUMEROUS TRENCHES AND PERSONNEL EMPLACEMENTS. SITSUM 18 JUN B2 REPORTS ÖNE BLOG UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND 4 TRUCKS. UNUSUAL ACTIVITY. 3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS HEADOUARTERS AREA CONSISTING OF 6 LARGE BARRACKS-TYPE BUILDINGS, 2 SUPPORT BUILDINGS, AND 15 OTHER BUILDINGS. VE ICES SITSUA IZ JUL 62 REPORTS INFORMATION ON CAMAGUEY MILITARY --- ## Page 95 DocId: 32627026 Page 95 NSTALLATIONS • IS AS FOLLOWS MILITARY HEADQUARTERS LOCATED IN NE SECTION OF CAMAGUEY -- NO APPARENT CHANGE FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62• VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- I0 SEMI-TRAILERS AND CARS/JEEPS AT WAREHOUSE LOADING DOCK. MILITARY TRAINING INSTALLATION 3.5 NM NNE CAMAGUEY AT SITE OF FORMER BERNABE SANCHEZ ADAN AIRFIELD -- BUILDINGS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTIONe NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE JUN 62• VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 5 TRUCKS PARKED NEAR MAINTENANCE BUILDING. ARTILLERY TRAINING AREA Y NN ESE OF SARAGUEY - 7 BARRACKS VARYING IN SIZER SEVERAL UNOCCUPIED FIELO ARTILLERY EMPLACEMENTS. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 6 TRUCKS, 2 FIELD ARTILLERY PIECES. _ MILITARY AREA LOCATED 4•5 NM ESE OF CAMAGUEY -- 2 BARRACKS, 2 UNOCCUPIED LIGHT AAA EMPLACEMENTS. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- TRUCK NOTED. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 5. MILITARY BARRACKS AREA 5.5 NM ESE OF CANAGUEY -- 4 BARRACKS, 6 UNOCCUPIEO LIGHT AAA EMPLACEMENTS• AND 3 TRENCHES IN AREA. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- ONE TRUCK AND 6 POSSIBLE LIGHT ANA PIECES. B• MILITARY AREA LOCATED 7.5 NM. SSW OF CAMAGUEY -- 7 PROBABLE BARRACKS, SEVERAL OTHER BUILDINGS, 3 PROBABLE VEHICLE SHELTERS, AND 12 UNOCCUPIED AAA/AW EMPLACEMENTS. VEHICLESTEQUIPKENT -- 28 TRUCKS THROUGHOUT AREA. --- ## Page 96 DocId: 32627026 Page 96 CAMAGUEY AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE 2 MAY 62. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 54 VEHICLES PARKEO IN OPEN AREA. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3082 • SITSUM 16 JUN 82 REPORTS ONE BLOG UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND 4 TRUCKS. UNUSUAL ACTIVITY. SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS SECURED AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION CONTAINING ONE LONG VEHICLE SHED, AND SEVERAL SMALL BUILDINGS. VEHICLES -- NONE. SITSUM 29 AUG 82 REPORTS INFORMATION ON THE CAMAGUEY MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IS AS FOLLOWS -- MILITARY HEADGUARTERS LOCATED IN NE SECTION OF CAFAGUEY, 1.8 NM SW OF SW END OF INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RUNWAY -- NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE JUL 62. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. MILITARY TRAINING INSTALLATION 3.5 NM NNE OF CAMAGUEY AT SITE OF FORMER BERNADE SANCHEZ ADAN AIRFIELD -- INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. ARTILLERY TRAINING AREA 7 NM ESE OF CAMAGUEY -- NO REPORT. MILITARY IRAINING AREA LOCATED 4.5 NM ESE OF CAMAGUEY - NO REPORT. MILITARY BARRACKS AREA 5.5 NA ESE OF CAMAGUEY AT EL PENON -- NO REPORT. MILITARY AREA LOCATED 705 NN SSH OF CAMAGUEY == INCOMPLEIE INFORMATION. CU 2123N 07757W --- ## Page 97 DocId: 32627026 Page 97 CAMAGUEY INTERNATIONAL AIRFIELD CU 2125N 87751W 6-3079. 22 MAY 62 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT =- TOTAL OF 18% INCLUDING 3 FAGOT/FRESCO, ONE PROBABLE FAGOT/FRESCO, LIAISON (POSSIBLY L-GO BRIGADIR). ONA LANESONSONE MAPE, ONE POSSIOLE TYPE TRUCKS SOUTH OF SW END SEA FURY. TORENWAY. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. G- 3088. JUNE 6Z REPORTS. AIRCRAFT COUNT 3 L- 60 BRIGADYR, ONE C-4,7. ONE FAROTALLETO SINGENG CAME P TOKEN CAN NOTEO IN DEFENSES, NO NOT OBSERVED. G- 30820 18 JUNE 62 REPORTS. NO CHANGE TO FACICITIES. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. AIRCRAFT == A TOTAL I1 INCLUDING -= 5 FRESCOA 1 CRATE, I C-47. 1 HOUND • LIAISON, 1 BRIGADYR AND I DERELICT SEA FURY: CONSTRÜCTION CONTINUING ON AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS. --- ## Page 98 DocId: 32627026 Page 98 G- 3083. 29 JUNE 62 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL INCLUDING & FRESCO, 2 CRATES ONE C-47, 2 LIAISONe ONE BRIGADYRA AND ONE UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE-ENGINE. ONE DERELICT SINGLE-ENGINE. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MAY 62. AIRCRAFT REVETHENTS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION• INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. G-3085, 12 JULY 62 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT - TOTAL 160 INCLUDING 6 FAGOT/FRESCO, 5 LIAISON, 2 BRIGADYR! ONE HOUND. ONE CRATE (TAKING OFFIA AND ONE. DERELICT FURY. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. TOKEN RADAR IN PLACE ON MORTH SIDE OF EAST END OF RUNWAY. NO OTHER APPARENT CHANGES SINCE JUN 620 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 18, INCLUDING 18 FAGOT/FRESCO, O BRIGADYR, ONE UNIDENTIFTED SINGLE-ENGINE, AND ONE DERELICI SEA FURY. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUL 02. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. G-3088• 23 AUG 62 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 18, INCLUDING 14 FAGOT / FRESCO, 2 LIAISON, ONE CAB AND ONE CRATE. NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3UB9 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT 13 FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 LIAISON, ONE C47, AND ONE CRATE• NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3898 SITSUM 5 OCT 62 REPORTS INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3100 SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE NOTED. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. --- ## Page 99 DocId: 32627026 Page 99 • I CAMILO CIENFUEGOS (SANTA CLARA) AIRFIELO CU G- 30789 1962 REPORTS. RUNWAY APPEARS COMPLETE, I BUT COULO DE EXTENDED AT EITHER ENO. CITUMINOUS SURFACINGO 100 TENTS ON HARDSTANDS• SEVEN OF 11 REVETHENTS ON THE WEST END HAVE BEEN AT LEAST PARTIALLY EARTH-COVERED. DEFENSES -- 3 UNOCCUPIEO ANA POSITIONS NORTH OF RUNWAY AT WEST END. TRENCHES OFF END OF RUNWAY, TRENCHES AND AN POSITIONS AROUND RADAR INSTALLATION, 6 AA EMPLACEMENTS, 3 OCCUPIED, WEST OF TOKEN RADAR SITE. AIRCRAFT -- FAGOT/FRESCO, AND 2. CRATE• APPROXIMATELY 95 OBSERVED. G- 3079, 22 MAY 1962 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF INCLUDING 3 MIG-15, 6 LIAISON-TYPE, AND ONE HELICOPTER CHARE-TYPET. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES, FACILITIES, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIOS FACILITTES SINCE 2 MAY GZ. NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS. G- 3080, 6 JUNE 1962 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- Z FAGOT/ MIDGET, ANO 7 LIAISON-TYPE. NO APPARENT CHANGE DEFENSES, FACILITIES, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. C-3081, 15 JUNE 19G2 REPORTS. NO APPARENT CHANGES. AIRGRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 5 INCLUDING 3 FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 COLT. INCOMPLETE INFO. G-3082, 18 JUNE 19G2 REPORTS. NO CHANGE FACILITIES NOTED. AIRCRAFT -- 2 FRESCO AND 2 PROBABLE COLT. INCOMPLETE INFO. G- 3083, 29 JUNE 1962 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 9, INCLUDING 6 FAGOT/FRESCO, AND 3 LIAISON-TYPE. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. PREVIOUSLY NOTED TOKEN RADAR NOT OBSERVED. NO OTHER APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINGE MAY 62. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON COVERED AIRCRAFT REVETNENTS. 2229N 07955W --- ## Page 100 DocId: 32627026 Page 100 .wv.1 G- 3085, 12 JULY 1962 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 8. INCLUDING 7 FAGOT/FRESCO AND ONE HARE. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE• CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING ON COVERED PARKING AREAS AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE PARKING. APRON. DEFENSES -- 4 OCCUPIED 6-GUN LIGHT AAA POSITIONS ALONG PERIPHERY OF AIRFIELD. TOKEN RADAR AGAIN IN PLACE ON HILL NORTH OF RUNWAY. NUMEROUS TENTS NOTEO IN VICINITY OF PARKING APRON AND LOOP TAXIWAY. 3886 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 6P INCLUDING 5 FAGOT/FRESCO, AND ONE LIAISON. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. G- 3089, 29 AUG OZ REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- IOTAL OF 7. INCLUDING 5 FAGOT/ FRESCO, ONE HOUND, AND ONE HARE. SEVEN COMPLETED EARTH-COVERCO REVETMENTS ANO 1 UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT WESTERN END OF AIRFIELO, AND Y COMPLETED EARTH-COVERED REVETMENTS AT EASTERN END. SITSURE 5 SEP G2 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- A • TOTAL OF 152 INCLUDING ONE FISHBED, 11 ONE HOUND. FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 BRIGADYRI AND FOUR PROPABLE AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES 144 X 8.5 FT) IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF FISHBED TAXIWAY. PROBABLE SHIPPING CRATES (APPROXIMATELY 44 X 8.5 FT) APPROXIMATELY 41500 FT WNH OF RUNWAY. 32 SQUAD TENTS, 9 LARGE SQUAD TENTS, 4 MECIUM-SIZE TENTS. AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS -- FOUR COVERED REVEINENTS, 3 EARTH-COVERED REVETMENTS, 2 REVETMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT WEST ENO OF RUNWAY. FIVE EARTH-COVEREO REVETMENIS AT EAST END OF RUNWAY. --- ## Page 101 DocId: 32627026 Page 101 POSITIONS 4 OCCUPIED O-GUN BATTERIES AND ONE OCCUPIEO 3-GUN BATTERY ON PERIPHERY OF AIRFIELO. TOKEN RADAR AND 4 VANS ON HILL NORTH OF RUNWAY. R RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. NUMEROUS VEMICLES AND EQUIPMENT THROUGHOUT THE EARTH SCRAPING EAST OF RUNWAY. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FAGILITIES SINCE AUG 62.. --- ## Page 102 DocId: 32627026 Page 102 CAMPO COLUMBIA MILITARY INSTALLATION CU 3078 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES OR DEFENSES SINCE APR 62. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 20 VEHICLES PARKED NEAR REVIEWING STAND, AND APPROXIMSTE SUAS 22 BUSE 62 APORR POOL AREA. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 44 BUSES IN MOTOR POOL, a CARS AND 2 BUSES AT REVIEWING STAND. NO APPARENT CHANGES IN FACILITIES AND DEFENSES EXCEPT THAT LIGHT AAA POSITIONS ARE NOT APPARENT. 30&A SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT OBSERVED. 56 BUSES AND NUMEROUS CARS IN AREA. NO APPARENT CHANGE TO FACILITIES SINCE MAY 62. ... 3UBZ SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGES TO FACILITIES SINCE APRIL 62. VEHICLES BUSES IN MOTOR POOL AND 50 MISCELLANCOUS VEHICLES THROUGHOUT SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS AREA. VEHICLES -- 43 BUSES NEAR AOMINISTRATIVE BUTLOING. I APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE APR 62. 3484 SITSUM 8 JUL 62 REPORTS VEHICLES -- APPROXIMATELY 50 BUSES NEAR ADMIFISTRATIVE BUILOING. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES• INCOMPLETE INFORMATION•. SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT 46 BUSES IN MOTOR PARK AND APPROXIMATELY 12 OTHER VEHICLES IN CAMP ARCA EARTH SCARRING INDICATING POSSIBLE NEW CONSTRUCTION IN CENTER AND SW SIDE OF AREA. 3R8U SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS SITES IN CENTER AND ON SW SIDE OF AREA. NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES OR DEFENSES SINCE APRIL 1962. VEHICLES 185 BUSES IN PARKING AREA AND 7 JUST OUTSIDE OF CONPOUND. 2305N 082261 --- ## Page 103 DocId: 32627026 Page 103 CAMPO FLORIDA POSS CRUTSE-MISSILE SITE CU 2386N 30B8 SITSUM, 29 AUG 1962 REPORTS A NEW MISSILE INSTALLATION HAS BEEN LOCATED 9.5 NA EAST OF HAVANA, 3.7 NN WSW OF CAMPO FLONIDA AT 23-46-30N782-11-864. INSTALLATION IS SITUATED APPROXIMATELY 4 NM SOUTH FROM. THE COAST AT AN ELEVATION APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET. THE SITE IS SECURED BY A FENCE AND CONSISTS OF SOME EQUIPMENT THAT IS SIMILAR IN BOTH CONFIGURATION: AND GENERAL LAYOUT AS THAT FOUND AT MISSILE STTES NEAR BANES AND SANTA CRUZ DEL NORTE. THE EQUIPMENT CONSISTS OF THO UNREVETTÉO PROBABLE CANVAS COVERED LAUNCHERS APPROXIMATELY I75 FEET APART AND ORIENTED 254 DEGREES AND 228 DEGREES RESPECTIVELY, TWO PROBABLE VANS, SEVEN CANVAS COVERED TRAILER-TYPE VANS TWO OF WHTCH ARE PROBABLY ELECTRONIC ASSOCIATED, ALL OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED EQUIPMENT IS INTER-CONNECTED BY CABLE. ALSO WITHIN THE AREA ARE SIX CANVAS COVERED MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, SIX TRAICER VANS, FOUR TRÜCK VANS, FOUR TENTS AND SEVEN UNIDENTIFIED PIECES OF EQUIPMENT. O8211W --- ## Page 104 DocId: 32627026 Page 104 CANANOVA MILITARY ARCA 3108 SITSUM 20 OCT 62 REPORTS EAST EDGE OF CANANOVA. SIX TENTS AND 2 LONG STORAGE-TYPE BUILDINGS. APPROXIMATELY IO UNIDENTIFIEO VEHICLES 1.000 SOUTH OF TENTS ON HEST SIDE OF ROAD. NO OTHER ACTIVITY NOTED. CU 2838N 87505W --- ## Page 105 DocId: 32627026 Page 105 • 1 CASILOA PORT CU 2145N 07959H 3078 MCI 62 REPORTS VESSELS NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT IN PORT AT CASILDA. IN PORT FACILITTES SINCE MAR 62• TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS. 3070 SITSUM 22 MAY GE REPORTS VESSELS HE NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT PORT AT CASILDA. NO CHANGE IN PORT FACILITTES SINCE Z MAY 62. TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS. 30BO SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS TROOP OR VEHICULAR CONCENTRATIONS NOTED. NO RAIL TRAFFIC. CASILDA - 28 TANK CARS NEAR POL AREA. NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT AT PIERS AND IN HARBOR. CARGO VESSEL (APPROXIMATELY 350 FTS ON SE COURSE QUISIDE OF HARBOR. SITSUM 29 JUN &2 REPORTS VESSELS -- NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT IN CASTLDA PORT. NO TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS NOTED. SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY ACTIVITY OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATION OBSERVED IN TRINIDAD. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES AT CASILDA PORT SINCE MARCH 62. VESSELS ONE CARGO VESSEL AT QUAY. 3483 SITSUM 29 AUG S2 REPORTS 205 NM SOUTH OF TRINIDAO. VESSEL DESERVEO OFF-LOADING MATERIEL. VENICLES/EQUIPHENT --S TANKS, IS TANKS OR SP GUNS, 16 UNIDENTIFIEO VEHICLES, AND APPROXIMATELY 28 TRUCKS IN IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF WHARF. APPROXIMATELY 10 UNIDENTIFIEO PIECES OF EQUIPMENT ON LARGE CARGO VESSEL AT PIER. --- ## Page 106 DocId: 32627026 Page 106 CHANDAS SAM SITE CU 2213N 7 OCT 1962 REPORTS LOCATED 2 NA NE OF CHAMBAS AT 22-13-20N7078-53-30W AND 12 NU SSW OF PUNTA ALEGRE. SITE TS NOT REVETTED. EQUIPMENT OBSERVED - 6 LAUNCHERS PROB CANVAS COVERED, POSS FRUIT SET RADAR AND Y VANS IN CENTRAL GUIDANCE AREA, 4 POSS MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, APPROX TO TADDITIONAL VEHICLES, APPROX IN TENTS, SITE CONFIGURATION NOT DISCERNIBLE. 67853H --- ## Page 107 DocId: 32627026 Page 107 CHAPARRA SAM SITE CU 2107N 57626N SAM SITE IS LOCATED 3.2 NM SE OF CHAPARRA. 3493 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS 3. 2 NM SE OF CHAPARRA AT 21-117-20N 976-26-20H- SIX LAUNCH POSITIONS NOTED, STAR CONFIGURATION. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. _SITSUM Y OCT 62 REPORTS SA-2 SAM SITE, FIRST REPORTED IN LATE SEP 021 IS UNREVEITEO AND CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 6 PROBABLE CANVAS-COVEREO. MISSILE LAUNCHERS, POSSIBLE FRUIT SET RADAR AND 5 VEHICLES IN CENTRAL GUIDANCE AREA, POSSILE SPOONREST RADAR AND 2 ASSOCIATEO VEHICLES, TENTS, 7 POSSIBLE TENTS, AND PPROXIMATELY ZO ADOITIONAL VEHICLES. --- ## Page 108 DooId: 32627026 Page 108 •CIEGO DE AVILA, SAM ASSEMBLY AREA CU 2152N 878441 CUBAN REFUGEE REPORTED SEEING CONVOY OF SOVIET VEHICLES TURN IN AT FINCA JULIA, LOCATED 7 KH NOKTH OF CIEGO DE AVILA AT GRID Q0295248. APPROXIMATELY LINDA SOVIETS REPORTED THERE• CUBANS REPORTEOLY EXCLUDEO. RUMORS CIRCULATING . AMONG RESIDENTS THAT MISSILE WAS LOCATED ABOUT IT KM NORTH OF CIEGO DE AVILA. DATE OF INFO. OCT 62 3498 SITSUM 5. OCT 62 REPORTS NM NE OF CIEGO DE AVILA AT 21-52-00N 078-44-07W• BIVOUAC AREA CONTAINING 15 LARGE TENTS, APPROXIMATELY 25 SMALL TENTSO ANO APPROXINATELY 45 VEHICLES ANO PIECES OF CQUIPHENT. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. --- ## Page 109 DocId: 32627026 Page 109 a l CIENFUEGOS PORT FACILITIES CU 2209N 08027W G- 3078, 2 MAY 62 REPORTS.: NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MISSION 3850, 3 SEP 61. ONE SMALL FREIGHTER AT LONG T-SHAPE PIER NEXT TO PUNTA VERDE 2 LARGE FREIGHTERS OFF PUNTA MAJAGUA. NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT THROUGHOUT HARDOR. NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.. VESSELS -- ONE TANKER, 4 CARGO VESSELS, 6 COASTAL FREIGHTERS, 18 BARGES, LIGHTERS, AND LAUNCHES, 6 SMALL PATROL BOATS, AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT. 22 MAY 62 REPORTS. FACILITILS 6-30794 SINCE 2 MAY 62• VESSELS -- ONE CARGO NO APPARENT CHANGE IN VESSEL ANCHORED WEST OF PUNTA CORDA. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 6-30800. 6 JUN 62 REPORTS. VESSELS -- ONE CARGO VESSEL (S0O FTI, CARGO VESSEL (415 FID CARGO VESSEL 1200 FTl. ALONGSIDE PIERS AT PUNTA VEROE. ONE CARGO VESSEL (415 FT) ALONGSIDE QUAY NORTH END ENSENADA MARSILLAN, NUMEROUS. SMALL CRAFT. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES INCLUDE LARGE QUANTITY OF 25-FT CRATES AND SINCE NAY 620 VLENSERSS IN ENSENADA MARSILLAN. G- 3082, 18 JUN 62 REPORTS. SINCE MAY 620 VESSELS REPOR SARGOO CHANGS TANKER ANDIES COASTAL TANKER. 6-30871. • 29 JUN 62 REPORTS. VESSELS -- 3 CARGO ONE PATROL CRAFT, 4 PT BOATSO AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT. --- ## Page 110 DocId: 32627026 Page 110 G-3095. 12 JUL 62 REPORTS. VESSELS -- ONE TANKER AT PIPELINE PIER. ONE FREIGHTER AT RAIL PIER: FREIGHTERS AT T-HEAD PIER ON SOUTH SIDE. 2 KRONSHTADT- CLASS. 4 PT BOATS, AND ONE POSSIBLE GUNBOAT AT CAYO LOCO. ONE PT BOAT ON SOUTH SIDE OF PENINSULA. ONE POSSIBLE PI BOAT ON MARINE RAILWAY. ONE U/I BOAT AT LAST END OF SOUTH SIDE OF PENINSULA. NUMEROUS BARGES AND SMALL CRAFT IN HARBOR. MATERIAL STORED IN OPEN AT CAYO LOCO. SITSUM 5 i AUG 62 REPORTS VESSELS ONE 514-FT FREIGHTER OFFLOADING UNTO BARGES. ONE 485-FT FREICHTER MOVING INTO DOCK AREA. ONE 440-FT FREIGHTER ALONG SIDE OF T-HEAD PIER. 2 FREIGHTERS AND 520 FTS AT RAIL PIER. 4 PT GOATS, ONE POSSIBLE GUNBOAT. 2 PATROL GRAFT. NUMEROUS BARGES _AND SMALL CRAFT IN MARBOR. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MAY 62. RAIL CARS -- 12 BOXCARS ON DOCK, 24 BOXCARS ON SIDINGS AT END OF DOCK• APPROXIMATELY 190 FREIGHT CARS IN RAILYARO. 6-3288%. 29 AUG 62 REPORTS. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN PORT FACILITIES SINCE JUL 62• VESSELS -- 3 FREIGHTERS OFF-LOADING AT TORRIENTE PIER AND DONESTEVEZ WHARF (ENSENADA MARSILLAND, ONE FREIGHTER AT ANCHOR IN GAMIA DE CIENFUEGOS, 4 PT BOATS AND ONE KRONSITADI-CLASS PO AT NAVAL DASE. 30B9 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS VESSELS -- 3 FREIGHIERS AT TORRIENTE PIER AND DONERTEVEY WHARF• ONE FRETCHTER RAILROAD PIER. INCOAPLETE INFORMATION. --- ## Page 111 DocId: 32627026 Page 111 * 1 CTENFUEGOS SAM SITE G-3088, 29 AUG 62 REPORTS • SSE OF CIENFUEGOS AT 22-02-50N 800-24-26W. SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SIX UNREVETTEO LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH AT LEAST S LAÜNCHERS EMPLACED, ONE OF WHICH IS POSSIBLY NET-COVERED. GUIDANCE RADAR AND 4 ASSOCIATED VANS LOCATED IN CENTER OF SITE. CABLE SCARS NOTED LEADING FROM THE GUIDANCE AREA TO AT LEAST 4 OF THE LAUNCH POSITIONS. THREE PROBADLE MISSILE TRANSPORTERS ARE T PRESENT. CU 2202N 080247 --- ## Page 112 DocId 32627026 Page 112 COLONEL MARTIN MARRERKO AIRFIELO 3078 MCI • 2 MAY 62 REPORTS NO CHÄNGE SINCE MISSION 3445. 23 APR 611 EXCEPT THAT NE/SW RUNWAY IS UNDERGOING REPAIR AND IS BEING REGRADED: NOT SERVICEABLE AT TIME OF PHOTOGRAPHY. BURGRAS PROGNONE NOT SERVICEABLE BECAUSE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PROBABLY RUNWAY IMPROVEMENT I• NO OTHER APPARENT CHANGE SINCE FEB NUMEROUS TRENCHES AND FIRING POSITIONS AROUND AIRFIELD. 30U8 SITSUN 6 JUN 6Z REPORTS AIRCRÄFT -- NONE. APPARENT CHANGE TO DEFENSES OR FACILITIES SINCE MAY G2. RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING. NOT SERVICEABLE. 3095 SITSUM 29 SEP ÜZ REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE• NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE JUN 62. RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION CONTINUINGO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SCATTERED THROUGHOUT AREA. 3101 SITSUM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE. CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING ON RUNWAYS. GRADING HAS PROGRESSEO FOR APPROXIMATELY 5,206 FT ON NH RUNWAY. UNWAYS PROBABLY UNSERVICEABLE. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. CU 2158N 08247W --- ## Page 113 DocId: 32627026 Page 113 CONDADO AREA, PROBABLE MILITARY INSTALLATION 3078 MCT. 2 MAY 62 REPORTS ONE NA SW OF CONDADO. NINE BARRACKS APPROXIMATELY I28 BY 25 FT, ONE BUILDING 120 BY 75 FT, FIVE MISCELLANEOUS SMALLER BUILDINGS. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT 24 TRUCKS, 3 JEEPS. AIRCRAFT -- ONE HOUND. AIRCRAFT =- ONE HOUND. I2 BUILDINGS, APPROXIMATELY 120 BY 29 FT, AND SMALLER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS. NO DEFENSES NOTED. CU 2152N A7951W --- ## Page 114 DocId: 32627026 Page 114 CUATRO CAMINOS AREA, MILITARY TRAINING AREA 3060 SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS & LÄRGE AND NUMEROUS SMALL BUILDINGS, 10 UNOCCUPIED WEAPONS EMPLACEMENTS. ONE FLAT BEO TRUCK, O. CAMOUFLAGED VEHICLES IN REVETMENTS, AND EXTENSIVE TRACK ACTIVITY AT 28-06-30N 075-33-201. CU 2007N 07533W --- ## Page 115 DocId: 32627026 Page 115 CUEVAS DEL PEPU, REPORTED MISSILE ACTIVITY CU 3065 SITSUH 2 FEU O2 REPORTS NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED. 3071 MCI 15 MAR. 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED. 3074 SITSUM I APR OZ REPORTS MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED. INCOMPLETE REPORT. 3HBA SITSUM 6 JUN G2 REPORTS APPARENT CHANGE IN AREA DEFENSES. UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OBSERVED. 329L SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS MISSILE OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED. 3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTEO. 3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS MILITARY OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTEO. 2022N 97622N --- ## Page 116 DocId: 32627026 Page 116 DOS CAMINOS AREA, MILITARY TRAINING AREA CU ZBI1N 075494 SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS APPROXIMAIELY 4S FA POSITIONS, 2 AW POSITIONS, ONE MORTAR POSITION. NUMEROUS TRENCHES AND PERSONNEL EMPLACEMENTS LOCATED 20-10-45N 475-48-401. --- ## Page 117 DocId: 32627026 Page 117 EL CRISTO AREA, MILITARY TRAINING AREA 3045 MOI 23 APR 61 REPORTS 205 NA NH OF EL CRISTO. 12 PROBABLY OCCUPIED AUTOMATIC WEAPONS POSITIONS LOCATEO ON " SIDE OF ROUTE 6-53. 3OGH SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS NUMEROUS TRENCHES, FA EMPLACEMENTS AND TRAINING SCARS AT 20-08-28N 48-810410 SITSUM 6 DEC 61 REPORTS APPROXIMATELY 45 UNOCCUPILO FA POSITIONS. NUMEROUS TRENCHES, PERSONNEL EMPLACEMENTS AND VEHICLE TRACK ACTIVITY. SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS APPARENT CHANGES NOTED SINCE HAY 02. CU 2009N 07548H --- ## Page 118 DocId: 32627026 Page 118 EL CRISTO AREA, ARMOR TRAINING AREA 3062 SITSUM 19 JAN 62. REPORTS LOCATED I MILE EAST OF EL CRISTO. COVERS APPROX 8U ACRES AND IS PARTIALLY FENCED. 2 PROBABLE SUPPORT BUILDINGS, PROBABLE TENTS AND 3. SMALL TRENCHES • VEHICLES 5 HEAVY TANKSO 2 PROBABLE TANKS, POSSIBLE TANK, Z CARGO VEHICLES. CU 2407N 875446 --- ## Page 119 DocId: 32627026 Page 119 -I CRISTO AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION CU. 2008N 87547W MCI 2 MAY 62 NH NH OF • REPORTS EL CKISTO. ENCOMPASSING NM ON EAST 510E.. AND ABOUT 2.5 AREA TO WEST CONTAINS AT LEAST 3U OISPERSED SINGLE-STORY, GABLE-ROOFED QUILDINGS• ARFA ALSO CONTAINS NUMEROUS FA POSITIONS, TRENCH SYSTEMSI AND VEMICLE REVETMENTS• ONE FA POSITION AND ONE NORTAR POSITION OCCUPIED. EXTENSIVE AREA OF TRACKED VEHICLE SCARRING. SEVERAL AH POSITIONS AND 18 GARAGE-TYPE BUILDINGS NEAR TRACKED AREA JUST WEST OF TRENCHES.. POSSIBLE HO AREA LOCATED 2.3 PIM NORTH OF TRAINING AREA SECURED BY FENCE AND SEVERAL TRENCHES. --- ## Page 120 DocId: 32627026 Page 121 EL CRISTO, MILITARY INSTALLATION CU 2007N 875461 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS IN FORTIFICATIONS SINCE 2 MAY 62. VEHICLES OR TROOP CONCENTRATION DOSERVEU. 3480 SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MAY 62. CONCENTRATION OF TROOPS OR EQUIPMENT NOTED: 3681 SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS 1 APPARENT CHANGES NOTED SINCE MAY 62. 3483 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MAY 62r EXCEPT ONE VEHICLE EMPLACEMENY OCCUPIED. ONE OTHER VEHICLE PARKED IN AREA. 3085 SITSUN 12 JUL 62 REPORTS MILITARY OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED. NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES (UNOCCUPIED SINCE HAY 620 3086 SITSUM • 5 AUG 62 REPORIS INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 31188 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS SIX FA PIECES IN TRAINING AREA 2 NM NW OF EL CRISTO. NO OTHER SIGNIFICANT CHANGES NOTED SINCE JUL 020 --- ## Page 121 DocId:32627026 Page 121 EL CRISTO, SUSPECT MISSILE AREA UNDER GROUND CONSTRUCTION. 3093 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS NO UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION SITES OR MISSILE-RELATED ACTIVITY NOTEO. CU - 2007N 875444 --- ## Page 122 DocId: 32627026 Page 122 •I ESPERALDA SAM SITE CU 3IAD, TOCT 1962 REPORTS LOCATED 6 NA NA OF ESMERALDA AT 21-55-48N/078-13-18W. SA-Z SAM SITE, UNREVETTEO, CONTAINING THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES AND LOUIPMENT - & EMPLACED LAUNCHERS PROBAULY CANVAS COVEREDO PROBAGLE FRUIT SET RADAR ANO 6 ASSOCIATED VANS IN GUIDANCE AREA, A POSSIBLE ACQUISITION RADAR • CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE TRANSPORTERS PROBABLE EMPLACED, RANSPORTER, S LARGE AND 6 SMALL TENTS AND AT LEAST IS OTHER VEMICLES. 2155N 87013W --- ## Page 123 DocId: 326 706 raue 123 GUANAJAY AREA, MILITARY CAMP 3070 2 MAY 62 REPORTS 2.1, NAME OF GUANAJAY• CAMP CONTAINS 2 SUPPURT/BARRACKS BUILDINGS, « ASSOCIATEO BUILDINGS, AT LEAST 25 TENTS, I VEHICLES. DEFENSES -- ONE G-GUN UNOCCUPIEO FA POSITION • NH TO THE EAST AND ONE G-GUN UNOCCUPTED FA POSITION 1.I NM TO THE EASTA G-GUN UNOCCUPTEC FA POSITION 2.2 NH NORTH OF GUANAJAY, ONE &-GUN UNOCCUPIED FA POSITION 2OT NH NORTH OF GUANAJAY, ONE 6-GUN UNOCCUPIED FA POSITION I.4 N# NORTH OF GUANAJAY, 4-GUN UNOCCUPTED FA POSITION, POSITIONS WNW OF GUANAJAY. --- ## Page 124 DocId: 32627026 Page 124 GUANTANAMO AREA, MILITARY BARRACKS AND STORAGE • 3049 I5 JUNE GI REPORTS REPORTEO 25-06-35N 075-04-32H. i2 DWELLINGS, I B BARNS, ONE STORAGE- TYPE BUILDING, ONE STORAGE-TYPE BUILDING IN FENCED AREA, AND NUMEROUS SMALL ASSOCIATED QUILDINGS. CU 200 4N 07504W --- ## Page 125 DocId: 32627026 Page 125 JIGUANI AREA, SAM SITE CU 2021N 076201 SAM EQUIPMENT, LOCATEO 504 NA ESE OF JIGUANI, INCLUDES 6 CANVAS-COVEREO MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, MISSILE LAUNCHERS, AND 15 VEHICLES. 3093 SITSÜM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS 5.4 NM ESE OF JIGUANT AT 2P-21-GUN 875-20-0A% SAM EQUIPMENT EMPLACED) IN OPEN FIELDS INCLUDES S CANVAS-COVERED TRANSPORTERS, & MISSILE-LAUNCHERS, VEHICLES, AND 5 PIECES OF EQUIPMENT. THREE LARGE AND SMALL TENTS ALSO NOTED. 3098 SITSUM 5 OCT 62 REPORTS 5044. ESE OF JIGUANI AT 2W-21-MON 176-28-08W. PROBABLE SA-2 SAM SITE WITH CIRCULAR ROAD PATTERN AND " POSSIBLE LAUNCHERS. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. .... .. --- ## Page 126 DocId: 32627026 Page 126 JUCARDR SUSPECT MISSILE AREA CU 2137N CUBAN REFUGEE SOURCE REPORTED THAT IN MID-AUGUST A 208-MAN SCUIET ENCAMPMENT WAS OBSERVEO NORTH OF TOWN AT GAID QP2259539 ENCAMPHENT HAD TENTS, UPEN STORAGE OF CRATES, SEVERAL TRUCKS. NO SECURITY MEASURES, WEAPONS APPARENT• INTERCEPTEO INTERNAL MESSAGES OF LATE SEPTEMBER AND EARLY OCTOBER REVEAL PRESENCE OF SOVIETS IN JUCARO AREA. 3A98 SITSUM S OCT 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED WITHIN A IU-NM RADIUS OF JUCARO. 87851W --- ## Page 127 DooId: 32627026 Page 127 HAVANA. AAA DEFENSES IPIR 9617-5030 27 OCT 62 REPORTS 9.3 NM EAST OF CAMPO LIBERTAD AIRFIELD AT 23-05-34N 882-16-50W. SIX-GUN OCCUPIED, PRODABLY 57-MM. MEDIUM AAA BATTERY WITH FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT. GUNS ARE MANNED, CABLES: LEAD FROM EACH BATTERY TO CONTROL EQUIPMENT: LARGE PERSONNEL TENTS, Z BUILDINGS. CU 2385N 88216W --- ## Page 128 DocId:32627026 Page 178 *I MAVANA, 3078 NCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS SUOMARINES -- NONE OOSERVED• SURFACE COMBATANTS -- ONE PF AND 2 PT BOATS CUBAN NAVAL SHIPYARD ICASA BLANCADO AUXILIARY/HERCHANT -- 23 FREIGHTERS, TANKER, & SMALL FREIGHTERS, AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT THROUGHOUT THE MARBOR. NUMEROUS CRATES OUSERVED AT VARIOUS PIERS AND WHARVES. APPROXIMATELY LOU RAIL CARS (ROXCARS, TANK CARS, AND FLAT CARSI DUSERVED ADJACENT TO HARBOR AREA. 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS SURFACE COMBATANTS -- ONE PF AND ONE AUXILIARY VESSEL AT PAULA PIER NO 2, 4 PT AND 2 SMALL PATROL CRAFT AT NAVAL SHIPYARO. AUXILIARY/MERCHANT -- ZB FREIGHTERS, ONE TANKERO D SHALL FREIGHTERS, AND NUMEROUS SHALL CRAFT THROUCHOUT HARBOR- LOGISTICS/MATERIAL -- ONE FREIGHTER CARRYING TEN 30-40 FT LONG PACKING CRATES ON DECK. 3080 SIT SUM • JUN. 02 REPORIS VESSELS - 1E LARGE FREIGHTERSO 2 SMALL COASTAL FREIGHTERS, ONE SMALL TANKER, ONE BARGE, 3 PATROL CRAFTO 2 FRIGATES. 3 PT BOATS, AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT THOUGHOUT HARBOR. SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS VESSELS - 29 LARGE AND SMALL. CARGO, 2 TANKERSO 4 PI COATSO AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT IN HARBOR. NO APPARENT CONCENTRATIONS OR STOCKPILING NOTED. CU 2308N 08221W --- ## Page 129 DocId: 32627026 rade 129 3084 SITSUM a JUL 62 REPORTS AT LEAST 15 CARGO SHIPS. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3885 SITSUM 12 JUL 02 REPORTS VESSELS -- 2 PATROL FRIGATES, 2 PATROL CRAFT. ONE POSSIBLE PATROL CRAFI, 3 PT BOATSE 20 FREIGHTERS, AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT. NO APPARENT CONCENTRATIONS OR STOCKPILING NOTED IN HARBOR AREA. 3A06 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS VESSELS -- 11 SURFACE COMBATANTS, INCLUDING 3 PATROL FRIGATESe 4 PATROL CRAFT, ONE POSSIBLE PATROL CRAFTe 3 PT BOATS. 20 FREIGHTERS, AND NUMEROUS SMALLER VESSELS. NO STOCKPILING OR CONCENTRATIONS NOTED. 3098 SITSUA 29 AUG 62 REPORTS VESSELS - A TOTAL OF 35 CARGO/TANKERS, 3 EX-US-PF. ? PT BOATS AND 3 PC AS FOLLOWS -= ONE FREICHTER AT COAL LiHARF NO 20 THO LIGHTERS AND 3 UNIDENTIFIEO VESSELS AT GAMIZ CYLINORICAL TANK CARS ON DECK AND ONE LIGHTER AT ESSO PIER. ONE FREIGHTER AT COIFICIO QUAY NO L. ONE FREIGHTER AT REGLA PIER 34. GNE FREIGHTER AT GEGUIRISTAIN KHARF• FIVE FREIGHTERS AND ONE TÄNKER AT CAYO CRUZ• ONE COASTAL FREIGHTER AT POTE GUAY. ONE FREIGHTER AT ATARES FRUIT WHARF AND ONE AT VACCARO WHARF. THREE EREIGHTERS AT WAND LINE PIER AND WHARF... TWO SMALL FREIGHTERS AT UNITED FRUIT COMPANY PIER AND WHARF. ONE FREIGHTER AT HAVANA CENTRAL PIER. SMALL FREIGHTER AT PAULA PIER NO 3. THREE US PF-TYPE VESSELS AT PAULA PIER NO 1. ONE FREICHTER AT SANTA CLARA PIER. ONE FREIGHTER AT MACHINA PIER. ONE FREIGHTER --- ## Page 130 DocId: 32627026 Page 130 .. MAVANA SAM SITE G- 3088, 29 2 AUG 62 REPORTS. 6.7 NM ENE OF - HAVANA AT 23-89-25N 982-13-324. SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. UNPEVETTIO LAUNCH POSITIONS. LAUNCHERS: FRUIT SET RADAR WITH APPROXIMATELY 6 ASSOCIATED VANS, 6 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERS, APPROXIMATELY L0 VEHIGLESe AND APPROXIMATELY 15 TENTS. CU 23H9N 002131 --- ## Page 131 DocId: 32627026 Pade 131 HAVANA, VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREA ADJACENT TO RAIL YARD, JUST SOUTH OF HAVANA HARBOR. OPEN STORAGE AREA CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 150 TRUCKS AND APPROXIMATELY 1,300 U/1 VEHICLES AND/OR PIECES OF EQUIPMENT• APPROXIMATELY 88 SQUARE SHIPPING CRATES. 3458 &C1 3 SEP O1 REPORTS ADJACENT TO RAIL YARD, JUST SOUTH OF HAVANA HARBOR. OPEN STORAGE AREA CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 158 TRUCKS AND APPROXIMATELY 1,300 U/I VEHICLES AND/OR PIECES OF EQUIPMENT. 3068 SITSUM 26 OCT OI REPORTS ADJACENT TO RAIL VARD, JUST SOUTH OF HAVANA HARBOR. OPEN STORAGE AREA CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY S0 TRUCKS AND 156 UNTOENTIFIED VEHICLES AND/OR PIECES OF EQUIPMENT. 3461 SITSUM & DEC 61 REPORTS ADJACENT TO RAIL YARD, JUST SOUTH OF HAVANA HARBOR: OPEN STORAGE AREA CONTAINING 150 PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, AND 1O BUSSES. 3A88 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS AREA ADJACENT TO RAILYARO SOUTH OF HAVANA HARBOR. TOTAL OF 439 VEHICLES, INCLUDING LARGE TRUCKS, 305 MEDIUM TRÜCKS, 31 JEEPS, 2 LOW BOYS, 12 BUSES AND 11 VEHICLES OF UNDETERMINED TYPE. CU. 2307N 08221W --- ## Page 132 DocId: 32627026 Page 132 HAVANA. VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT PARK 3&B0 SITSUM & JUN &Z REPORTS SW OUTSKIRTS OF HAVANA, AND SW EDGE UF MARIANAO. LARGE VEHIGLE EQUIPMENT PARK CONTAINING SEVERAL HUNDREO VEHICLES AND PIECES OF UNIDENTIFIED EGUIPMENT. MAJORITY OF VEHICLES APPEAR TO BE SMALL TRÜCKS AND JEEPS. 8 POSSIBLE MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS. CU 2303N 88227W --- ## Page 133 DocId: 32627026 Page 133 HAV ANA- AREA AAA DEFENSES &I REPORTS OCCUPIED AAA • SITE AT +3-84-158 682-29-869to VEHICLES, TENTS IN AREA. OCT EL REPORTS MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIED ANA SITE AT 23-04-15N 082-74-00W. SIX VEHICLES. IN AREA. 6 DEC 61 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM E-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-14-15N 082-20-130n° 7 VEHICLES, TENTS IN AREA. CU 2304N 88228W --- ## Page 134 DocId: 32627026 Page 134 MAVANA AREA ANA DEFENSES 3058 MCL 3 SEP O1 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-03-25N 482-17-15W• ENPLACEMENT, 4 PERSONNEL TENTS AND 3 VEHICLE REVETMENTS. 3UGÜ SITSUM 26 OCT GI REPORTS ONE MEDIUM &-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-48-25N 082-17-15W. FCC EMPLACEMENT, 4 PERSONNEL TENTS, 3 VEHICLE REVETNENIS AND & VEHICLES OBSERVEO. 3UGL SITSUH 6 DEC GL REPORTS ONE MEDIUM A-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-08-25N 082-17-15W0 FCC EMPLACEMENT, PERSONNEL TENTS, 3 VEHICLE REVETMENTS AND VEHICLES. CU --- ## Page 135 DocId: 326 27026 Page 135 HAVANA • AREA DAA DEFENSES 3058 MCI 3 SEP 61 REPORTS ONE MEDIUN O-GUN OCCUPIED MAA SITE AT 23-86-ZQN 882-17-351. SIX TENTS, 4 VEHICLES, 2 SMALL BUILDINGS IN AREA. 3:GH SITSUM 26 OCT GI REPORTS ONE MEDIU: G-GUN OCCUPIEO AAA _SITE AT 23-16-20N 062-17-35h. SIX TENTS: 4 VEHICLES, Z SMALL BUILDINGS IN AREA. 3HOL SITSUM 6 DEG GL REPORIS ONE MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-46-22N 032-17-35H0 4 TENTSe 4 VEHICLESe 2 SMALL BUILDINGS IN ARFA. CU 2306N 182184 --- ## Page 136 DocId: 32627026 Page 136 HAVANA AREA AAA DEFENSES 3058 KC1 3 SEP &1 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM 6-GUN OCCUPIEO AAA SITE AT 23-04-00N 682-27-25H. ALL EMPLACEMENTS COVEREO BY NETTING. I VEMICLES PARKLO IN AREA. 3U61 SITSUM & DEC 61 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM G-GUN UCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-24-00N 002-27-25N. ALL EMPLACEMENTS COVERED BY NETTINGO & VEHICLES. CU --- ## Page 137 DooId: 32627026 Page 137 HAVANA AREA ANA DEFENSES NCI 3 SEP 61 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM E-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-45-36N 482-27-50Wo RADAR CONTROLLED. VEHICLES IN AREA. 3961. 6 DEC OL REPORTS ONE MEDIUM 6-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-25-30N 082-27-50W0 PADAR CONTROLLED. 12 VEHICLES. CU 2366N 08228W --- ## Page 138 DocId: 32627026 Page 138 HAVANA AREA AAA DEFENSES 3458 MCI 3 SEP 61 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AI 23-03-35N 882-25-05H. FOUR TANKS AND LA VEHICLES IN AREA. 6 DEC 61 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM &-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-43-35N 602-25-45M• 8 VEHICLES, AND CÜ 2304N 00225W --- ## Page 139 Do01d: 32627026 Page 139 HAVANA AREA AAA DEFENSES: 3058 MCI 3 SEP 61 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM 6-GUN OCCUPIED AAA SITE AT 23-04-15N 882-22-15W° EICHI VEMICLES, 4 TENTS IN AREA:O SITSUM 26: 0CT. 01. REPORTS ONE MEDIUM G-GUN OCCUPIEU AAA SITE:AT. 23-04-151 002-22- 15W• NING VEHICLES, 4 TENTS IN AREA• 3061 SITSUM 6 DEC 61 REPORTS ONE MEDIUM &-GUN OCCUPTED AAA SITE AT 23-06- 15N • 082-22-15W• NINE VEHICLES, 4 TENTS: IN AREA. CU: 2304N 08222W --- ## Page 140 DocId: 32627026 Page 140 HAVANA AREA, MILITARY CAMP • 3062 SITSUM 19 JAN 62 REPORTS A ROAD-SERVED, PARTIALLY FENCED MILITARY CAMP LOCATED O NM SE OF HAVANA AND 3 NM NNW OF MANAGUA, COVERS APPROX 6D ACRES, BARRÄCKS... FACILITIES IN THE AREA ARE CAPABLE OF HOUSING APPROX 175 MEN. THE AREA CONTAINS THREE BARRACKS: ONE PROBABLE BARRACKS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, ONE ADMIN BUILDING, TWO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS, FIVE STORAGE BUILDINGS, ONE BARN, ONE ANTI- AIRCRAFT ARTILLERY EMPLACEMENT 15 FEET IN DIAMETER, AND TWO EXCAVATIONS. SEVEN PRIME MOVERS, 20 WHEELED VEHICLES, AND & CAMOUFLAGE NETS COVERING UNIDENTIFIED EQUIPMENT ARE VISTOLE IN THE AREA. A SMALL LOCAL TRAINING AREA IMMEDIATELY SW OF THE MILITARY CAMP CONTAINS RECENTLY DUG TRENCHES AND FOXHOLES. TWO CAMOUFLAGED 3-GUN LIGHT ANTIAIRCRAFT: ARTILLERY SITES (PROBABLY OCCUPIED) WITH EMPLACEMENTS: 15 FEET IN DIAMETER ARE LOCATED 1, 500 FEET SOUTH OF THE CAMP. THREE OTHER... BUILDINGS ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE - VICINITY DE THE ANTIAIRCRAFT ARTILLERY SITES. CU. 2380N 08218W --- ## Page 141 DocId: 32627026 Page 141 HAVANA HAN CAL AMMO STORAGE 3007 SITSUM 21 FEB 62 REPORTS FENCED AREA CONT • AT LEAST TWO CARTH-COVERED DRIVE-THOUGH BUILDINGS WITH INTERCONNECTING ROAD. CONSTRUCTION IS CONTINUING IN THE AREA. TAL: 3067: 8/311. -: L/305. CLEAR: 250-F502-1F-17-6 50- E723-SHEET-3785-1115 CU 2304N3 08219W --- ## Page 142 DocId: 32627026 Pag 142 HAVANA AREA, COASTAL DEFENSES :3036 2.5 NM EAST OF MORRO CASTLE, HAVANA. L.5 NM STRETCH OF BEACH: CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 35 GUN POSITIONS, 10: OF WHICH ARE POSSIBLY OCCUPIE0. (INCOMPLETE INFORMATION) 3058| MCI 3: SEP GI REPORTS EAST OF MORRO CASTLE, HAVANA. NM STRETCH OF BEACH CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 35 GUN POSITIONS: CU --- ## Page 143 DooId: 32627026 Page 143 HAVANA AREA, MILITARY DEFENSES 3429 4.2 NM SW OF MORRO CASTLES ON LOMA DE HUSILLO. ONE UNOCCUPIED &-GUN MEDIUM AA POSITION, 20 OCCUPIED LIGHT AA POSITIONS: THREE 4-GUN, ONE 5-GUNI ONE 7-GUN. AND THREE POSSIBLE 3-GUN MEDIUM DP POSITIONS AND NUMEROUS LIGHT ARTILLERY POSITIONS, ALL UNOCCUPIED ON THE HIGH GROUND OF THE LOMA DE HUSILLO. 3058 MCD 3 SEP 61 REPORTS 402 NM SH OF MORRO CASTLE: ON LOMA DE HUSILLO: ONE UNOCCUPIED 6-GUN MEDIUM AA POSITIONA 20 OCCUPIED LIGHT AA POSITIONS: THREE 4-GUN. ONE 5-GUN, ONE 7-GUN• AND THREE POSSIBLE 3-GUN MEDIUM: DP POSITIONS AND NUMEROUS LIGHT ARTILLERY POSITIONS, ALL UNOCCUPIED, ON THE MIGH GROUND OF THE LOMA DE HUSILLO. EU: 230GN 08224W --- ## Page 144 DocId 326 27026 Lace 144. HAVANA AREA, MILITARY DEFENSES 3445 206 NM EAST OF GUANABACOA ANO 1,509 FT" NE OF ROUTE 2-19. ONE 5-GUN AND TWO 4-GUN POSITIONS, PRODABLY OCCUPIED: AND ONE PROBABLE 3-GUN UNOCCUPIED MEDIUM ARTILLERY POSITION. * 3058 MCI, 3 SEP 61 REPORTS 206 NA EAST OF GUANÁBACOA AND 1,500 F1322 NE OF ROUTE 2-190 ONE 5-GUN AND THO 4-GUN: POSITIONS, PROBABLY OCCUPIED, AND ONE PROBABLE 3-GUN UNOCCUPIED MEDIUM ARTILLERY POSITION OBSERVED. --- ## Page 145 DocId: 32627026. Page 145 HOLGUIN AIRFIELO CU 2049N 07610W G-3078, 2 NAY 62 REPORTSO RUNWAY APPROXINATELY 8S PERCENT BLACK-TOPPED. CONSTRUCTION OF RUNWAY AND FACILITTES CONTINUES. NO OTHER CHANGE SINCE FISSION 3074, LAPR 62. ARCRAFT =- NONE. SURFACING OF RUNWAY AND TAXIWAYS, AND CONSTRUCTION OF REVETTED PARKING AREAS CONTINUING. NO SECURTTY, COMMUNICATIONZELECTRONIG FACILITIES, OR WEAPONS STORAGE OBSERVED. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. +: G- 3079, 22 MAY 62 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT - NONE. DEFENSES: - TOTAL OF 13 LIGHT ANA EMPLACEMENTS - 9 OCCUPIED AND 4 UNOCCUPIED: NO COMMUNICATIONS OR CLECTRONICS FACILITIES IN AREA. 6-3080, 6 JUNE 62 REPORTS. AIRCRAFT - ONE CRATEV AND ONE CESSNA 310. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON RUNWAY, AIRFIELD FACILITIES, AND AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS•. RUNWAY PARTIALLY SERVICEABLE. NUMEROUS EMPLACEMENTS, BOTH OCCUPIED AND UNOCCUPIED ARDUND PERIMETER OF FIELD. 6-3081, 15 JUNE 62 REPORTS. RUNWAY COMPLETE AND SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON TAXIWAYSe: AIRCRAFT REVETNENTS AND OTHER SUPPORT FACILITIES• NUMEROUS LIGHT AA POSITIONS COCCUPIED AND --- ## Page 146 DooId: 32627026 Page 146 ONOCCUPTEDY AROUND PERIMETER OF FIELD. AIRCRAFT -- NONE INCOMPLLTESINFOSZZ 6-30837 29 JUNE 62 REPORTS. ATRCRAFT -- RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED, RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON TAXIWAYS NEARING COMPLETION. NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MID-JUN 62. G-3085, 12 JULY GZ REPORTS. AIRCRAFT -- NONE. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTTON CONTINUING ON TAXIWAYS, REVETMENTS, AND OTHER SUPPORT FACILITIES. NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE JUN: 620 3086 SITSUM S AUG 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT E- NONE OBSERVED. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING TAXIWAYS, REVETMENTS AND OTHER SUPPORT FACIL TIES. NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE JUL 62• G-38B80 29 AUG 62 REPORTS. RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY APPEAR SERVICEALE. CONSTRUCTION ON FACILITIES CONTINUES: ATRCRAFT -- NONE. 3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT 2 KUNWAYS SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTION: ON FACICITIES CONTINUINGO NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINGE JUN 620 3093 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE. RUNWAY AND TAXINAYS SERVICEABLE. CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING ON FACILITIES AND AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS. NEW NAVIGATIONAL AID UNDER CONSTRUCTION 2 NM SW OF THE SW END OF THE RUNWAY CONTAINS AREA A CRS-DE BE LOINS, T-SHAPED BUILDING, AND & SUPPORT-TYPE BUILDINGS. NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE LATE AUG G20 NO 3100 SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS: NO APPARENT CHANGE AN EACTUITTES SINGEESER 620 AIRCRAFT -- --- ## Page 147 DOCI 26 Page 147 HOLCUIN AREA, MILITARY MOTOR POOL. 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT 16 CARGO TRUCKS, 15 CARGO TRAILERS, 2 BULLDOZERS, ANO 19 UNIDENTIFTEO OBJECTS MEASURING APPROXIMATELY LO BY 3 FEET. NO TROUP CONCENTRATION OR DEFENSES IN IMMEDIATE AREA• 2 3084 SITSUM 6 JUN: 62 REPORTS LARGE CONCENTRATION OF OPEN STORAGE. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MAY 1962. ONG VEHICLE. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3082 51TSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS MOTOR POOL-APPROX 25 VEHICLES. MARRACKS ANO TRATNING AREA, 202 NM WEST- SOUTHWEST OF HOLGUIN AT 2052N/76171 CONTAINS 6 PROBABLE DARRACKS AND NUMEROUS TRENCHES AND AW POSITIONS: NUMEROUS TRENCH: NETWORKS AND AW POSITIONS ARE LOCATED ON HIGH GROUND SWAN ANO NE UF TOWN. INCOMPLETE INFO. 3063 SETSUM 29 JÜN 62 REPORTS MEMICLES =- 2 IN MOTOR POOL PARKING AREA. GARAGE AREA CONTALNS NUMEROUS CRATES IN OPEN STORAGE. NO CHANGE IN HARRACKSE OR IN TRENCHES ENCIRCLING TOWN. 3005 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS INSTALLATION.: ON SOUTH EDGE OF HOLGUIN PREVIOUSLY REPORTED AS A MILITARY MOTOR POOL IS NOW CONSIDGRED TO BE AN AGRICULTURAO EQUIPMENT STORAGE FACILITY. VEHICLES/EGUIPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 3U TRÜCKSA APPROXIMATELY 20: LIGHT TRUCKS OR TRACTORS, AND NUHEROUS CONTAINERS IN OPEN STORAGE: NO CHANGE IN HOLGUIN AREA DEFENSES. 3000 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 2 3088 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS XPPROXTRATELY IOU CONTAINERS IN OPEN STORAGE. NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED. VEHICLES -- ABOUT 25G SMALL VEHICLES IN PARKING AREA. CU 2052N 07616W --- ## Page 148 DocId: 32627026 Page 148 HOLGUIN AREAS. MILITARY ENCAMPMENT 3893 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS. 3.8 NM NORTH OF HOLGUIN IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE JUNCTION OF ROUTES G-58 AND 6-53P AT 20-57-00N 976-16-38W. WCODED AREA CONTATNING PERSONNEL TENTS+ NUMEROUS VEHICLES, ANO CONSIDERASLE TRACK ACTIVITY. MATERIEL STORED IN OPEN. CO 2057N 076164 --- ## Page 149 DocId 32 7026 Page 149 HOYO DE MANICARAGUA AREA, POSS BARRACKL AREA VE # 1 38161 1 NM WSW OF HOYO DE MANICARAGUA. 1L BARRACKS, 3 STORAGE BUILDINGST 3 POSSIBLE STORAGE BUILDINGS, 2 ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS, AND 5 SUPPORT BUILDINGS. AREA •S NM EASTOE. SITE CONTAINS 2 GROUPS OF BUILDINGS UNDER: CONSTRUCTION. ONG GROUP HAS 20: BUILDINGS. THE OTHER GROUP: HAS 12 BUILDINGS AND FOOTINGS FOR 8 MORE. AREA HAS POSSIBLE: PARADE GROUND. NO SECURITY MEASURES OBSERVED. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- NONE VISIGLE: • 3058 MOT 6I REPORTS ONE NM WSH OF HOYO DE MANICARAGUA. 11 BARRACKS, 3 STORAGE BUILDINGS, 3 • POSSIBLE STORAGE BUILDINGS+ 2 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS. AND G SUPPORT BUILDINGS. AREA •5 NM EAST OF SITE CONTAINS 2 GROUPS OF BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION• ONE GROUP HAS 21 BUILDINGS. THE OTHER GROUP-HAS 20 BUILÖINGS. NO SECURITY MEASURES OBSERVED. APPROXIMATELY 50 ARTILLERY PIECES ARRANGED IN ROWS WEST OF THE BARRACKS. APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FT SOUTH OF BARRACKS AREA FOOTINGS HAVE BEEN LAID FOR 3 LARGE BUILDINGS. • 3071 MOL 15 MAR 62 REPORTS NO CHANGE IN BARRACKS AREA SINCE MISSION 305803 SEP 61. THE 2 AREAS •5 NM EAST OF BARRACKS NOW APPEAR COMPLETED. 2 LARGE BUILDINGS SOUTH OF BARRACKS AREA ARE PARTIALLY COMPLETED. ALL AREAS ROAD SERVED. ARTILLERY -- NONE OBSERVED. 0 5 3078 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MISSION 3058, 3 SEP GL IN POSSIBLE BARRACKS AREA• NO ARTILLERY OBSERVED. AREA 0.5 NM EAST OF POSSIBLE BARRACKS APPEARS TO BE A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. AREA: SOUTH OF THE POSSIOLE BARRACKS AREA APPEARS TO BE AN INDUSTRIALS COMPLEX UNDER CONSTRUCTION. POSSIBLE UNDERGROUNO STORAGE AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION JUST SOUTH OF INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. CU 220SN 09004W --- ## Page 150 DocId 32 7026 Page 150 =.1 : LA:COLOMA SAM SITE G- 3088, 29 AUG: 62. REPORTS: 4.5 NM. NNW OF LA COLOMA AT 22-18-42N 883-32-35W- SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SIX LAUNCHERS, FRUIT SET RADAR AND 7 VANS-IN CENTER. 15 TRUCKS, 6 TENTS, 3 MISSILE-HOLD POSITIONS WITH 2 CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE TRANSPORTERS IN EACH. 3 HOLD POSITIONS REVETTED. ONE LAUNCHER AND VANS IN CENTER OF SITE BEING REVETTED. POSSIBLE ACQUISITION: RADAR SITE REVETTEO AND NET-COVERED. 3101: SITSOM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS SIX LAUNCHERS, 3 HOLD POSITIONS, AND GUIDANCE AREA IN: CENTER, ALL REVETTED. SITE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE COVERED OR NETTED. ONE UNIDENTIFIED REVETMENT NOTED. UNIDENTIFIED VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT NOTED IN SUPPORT AREA. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. CU 2218N 083321 --- ## Page 151 DooId: 3262 7026 Page 151 SE0E2E ESPERANZA MARTEL 3078 MOT 2 MAY 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS, EQUIPMENT OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OBSERVEO IN THE ESPERANZA-MARIEL AREA. 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY: 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE OR OTHER UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OBSERVEO. SITSUM 6: JUN 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OUSERVED. SITSUM 18 JUN: 62 REPORTS NO UNUSUAL MILITARY OR MISSILE ACTIVITY NOTED. ANCOMPLETE INFO. SITSUM: 29 JUN 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OR MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS NOTGO. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. # 3484 SITSUM 8 JUL 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OR MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OBSERVED. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. #: 3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED. 3086 SITSUM: 5 AUG 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY ACTIVITY NOTED. 3688 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS SEE BAHIA HONDA SAM SITE. CU 2301N 18245W --- ## Page 152 DocId: 32627026 Page 152 LA FLORA AREA MIL ¡RY STORAGE 3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS 205 NAWSH OF SAN ANTONIO DE LOS EANOS. AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION, CONTAINING STORAGE-TYPE BUILDINGS, 3 STORAGE-TYPE BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, AND 32 PROBABLE DWELLING UNITS. LOCATED IN WOODED AREA. NO SECURITY OR DEFENSES NOTED. CU 2252N 08233W --- ## Page 153 DocId: 326 7026 Page 153 LA-SIERRA: PROB:LI TARY: VEHICLE PARK 3069 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS 20.5 NMENE CIF COLON AND 1.5 NMASSE. OF LAM SIERRA, ATPAN EXISTING PROBABLE AGRICULTURAL STORAGE. AREA* CONTAINS 42 LARGE BUTLINGS WITH A VEHICLE COMPOUND TO THE REAR CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 300 VEHICLES. APPROXIMATELY: 50 VEHICLES ARE LOCATED: THROUGHOUT THE SUILOING AREA. AT LEAST L4 CANVAS-COVERED PROBABLE TANKS. IMMEDIATELY ACROSS THE ROAD FROM THE BUILOING AREA ARE 5 TENTS ANO APPROXIMATELY. 12 VEHICLES. CU 2249N 08033W --- ## Page 154 DocId: 32627026 Page 154 ARET LAS MERCEDES AREAS BOSI SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY INSTALLATIONS OR ACTIVITY NOTED. CU 2029N 07633W --- ## Page 155 DocId: 32627026 Page 155 SHANET CU: 2259N 08121W SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS SE OF LIMONAR, AT UTM 17QMR 626332 SERIES E7234 SHEET 3984 IVI. AREA CONTAINS 8 CANVAS-COVERED/CAMOUFLAGED PROBABLE TANKS, 6 PROBABLE BARRACKS, AND 12 SMALL SUPPORT BUILDINGS. ROAD SERVED. CONSIDERABLE TRACKEO-VEHICLE TRACK ACTIVITY IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. 13085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS 3.5 NM SE OF LIMONAR. NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE JUN 628 EXCEPT GROUND CLEARING NEAR BARRACKS AREA INDICATES POSSIBLE NEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY• VENTCLES/EQUIPMENT -- 8 CANVAS-COVERED TANK SO --- ## Page 156 DocId: 32627026 Page 156 LOMA ENRA POSS SAM ASSEMOLY AREA CU: SITSUM 2 MAY 62 REPORTS OPEN VEHICLE STORAGE ARCA WITH AN ACCESS ROAD IS LOCATEO ME MILES, SE OF HAVANA. CONTAINS SIX SMALL SHEDS OF WHICH ONE IS PROBABLY SENTRY BOX OR SHELTER FOR A CHECKER. NO VEHICLE PROCESSING OR MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ARE AREA. PHOTOGRAPHY OF 2. MAY: 1962 400 CARGO TRUCKS AND 100 CARGO TRAILERS. RAPHY OF 292AUG 1962 REVEADS APPROXIMATELY VEHICLES OF VARIOUS TYPES. --- ## Page 157 DocId 32627026 Page 157 LOS ANGELES SAM SITE CU A SAM SITE LOCATED INM ENE OF LOS ANGELES CONTAINS SIX UNREVETTED LAUNCHERS AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. 3093 SITSUM 26 SEP 62 REPORTS ONE NM ENE OF LOS ANGELES: AT 21-00-4QN 075-41-43WO SIX UNREVETTED LAUNCHERS EMPLACED. SITE ALSO CONTAINS 3 LARGE, ONE MEDIUM, AND 2 SMALL TENTS. FRUIT SEY RADAR AND 7 ASSOCIATED VANS IN THE CENTER OF THE SITE• 15 VANS, 7 HISSILE TRANSPORTERS, AND 6 UNIDENTIFIED VEHICLES ON NORTH SIDE OF SITE. SERVICE ROAD CONFIGURATION NOT EVIDENT. 3100 SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS SA-2 SAM SITE HAS BEEN MOVED APPROXIMATELY 250 YAROS WEST OF LOCATION REPORTED IN SEP 62, TO 21-01-45N7 175-41-50W• SITED WATCH IS UNREVETTEO AND PROBADLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING FACILTTTES AND AND EQUIPMENT -- 6 PROBAGLE CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE LAUNCHERS, FRUTT SET RADAR AND & ASSOCIATED VEHICLES IN CENTRAL GUIDANCE AREA, ONE POSSIOLE MISSILE CRANSPORTER, & TENTSY AND APPROXIMATELY 15 VEMICLES. LAUNCHERS ARE NOT DEPLOYCO IN A CIRCLES AND SITE CONFIGURATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED. 7210ON: 075410 --- ## Page 158 DocId: 32627026 Page 158 SEET LOS INDIOS, REPORTEO MISSILE ACTIVITY CU 203IN 07606W 3065 SITSUM 2 FEB 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVEO. 3074 SITSUM APR 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE ACTIVITY OBSERVED. PROBABLE MINING ACTIVITY 2 NM SOUTH OF SAN GERMAN AT 20-34-00N 076-08-004. ACTIVITY CONSISTS OF SEVERAL SMALL STRIP AREAS, 3 LINEAR CUTS INTO HILLSIDE AND NUMEROUS SINGLE-STORY, GABLE-ROOFED BUILDINGS. SEVERAL NEW ROADS AND 3 NEW RAILROAD SPURS NOT SHOWN ON MAP SHEET 4977: 1, SERIES 8723% SERVE THE AREA. 2 MAY 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS, FACILITICS OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED. 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS MILITARY ACTIVITY OBSERVED• TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS. SITSÜM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY ACTIVITY OBSERVED. TROOP OR VEHICLE CONCENTRATIONS. NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MAY 62. SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED. 3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY OR UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED. + 3086 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY OR OTHER UNUSUAL ACTIVITY NOTED. 3080 SITSUM 29 AUC 62 REPORTS NO: MISSILE ACTIVITY NOTED. --- ## Page 159 DocId: 32627026 Page 159 LOS PALACIOS ARCA, MILITARY ENCAMPMENT 3101 SITSUM 14 00T 62 REPORTS + a 4: MILITARY LOS PALACIOS AT 22-39-45N083-18- 15W. ENCAMPMENT WITH 17 LARGE TENTS, 20 SMALL SMALL TRUCKS, IA LARGE TRUCKS, 11 UNTDENTIFIED VEHICLES OR PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, AND AN AREA:OF OPEN STORAGE•: CUX 2239N/ 8318W --- ## Page 160 DocId : 32 7026 Page 160 MANAGUA AREA, EXPLOSIVES STORAGE 7. 3682 3 NM SH OF MANAGUA. FENCED AREA CONTAINING 9 REVETTED STRUCTURES AND 10 SUPPORT BUILOINGSE ROAD SERVED. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- NONE. 3058 MCT 3 SEP 61 REPORTS NO CHANGE SINCE MISSION 3045% 23 APR 610 * 3060 SITSUM 26 OCT 8I REPORTS 3 NM SA OF MANAGUA. FENCED AREA CONTAINING 9 EARTH-COVEREO HUNKERS, 2 PROBABLE CONCRETE BUNKERS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, AND 10 SUPPORT BUILDINGS. 3061 SITSUM G DEC 61 REPORTS 3 NM SW OF MANAGUA. FENCED AREA: CONTAINING 9 EARTH-COVERED BUNKERS® 2 PROBABLE CONCRETE BUNKERS UNDER A CONSTRUCTION, AND 10 SUPPORT BUTLDINGS. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3071 MCI 15 MAR 62 REPORTS 3 NM SW OF MANAGUA. FENCED AREA CONTAINING 9 HEAVILY REVETTED HUNKERS, & CONCRETE BUNKERS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED UNDER CONSTRUCTION APPEAR COMPLETED. REVETMENTS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION: IMMEDIATELY TO EAST OF THESE BUNKERS ARE 6 POSSIBLE BUNKERS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. 3078 MCI 2 MAY S2 REPORTS FENCEO AREA CONTAINING LI REVETTED BUNKERS. AND 6 ADOITIONAL BUNKERS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. LE ASSOCLATED BUILDINGS PLUS 2 UNDER CONSTRUCTIONO SEORET CU 2256N 082200 --- ## Page 161 DooId: 32627026 Page 161 MANAGUA MILITARY INSTALLATION: THIS IS THE HEADQUARTERS FOR AN ARMORED DIVISIONI ARTILLERY DIVISION, AND THE 3RD AND 4TH INFANTRY BATALLIONS: 3002 SITSUM 27 OCT 60 REPORTS SOUTHEAST EDGE OF MANAGUA. CAMP CONTAINS 15 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS, 10 BARRACKS, 6. VEHICLE SHEDS, 9 STORAGE BUILDINGS, ONE PROBABLE AMMUNITION BUNKER, ONE PROBABLE. AMMUNITION BUNKER UNDER CONSTRUCTIONA 16 SUPPORT BUILDINGS, AND AN AIRFIELO CONSTRUCTION (PIC TARGET 0586-1118%. DEFENSES INCLUDE ONE G-GUN OP POSITION ON HILL JUST NW OF BARRÄCKS, 6 GUNS EMPLACED. ONE &-GUN AA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION O7 NM SE OF BARRACKS, 6 GUNS EXPLACEO. ONE 4-GUN AA POSITION UNDER COMSTRUCTION LOT NN SSE OF BARRACKS: 1 GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 3-GUN AA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.8 NM SOUTH OF BARRACKS, 3 GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 6-GUN AA POSITION 1.6 NM.WEST OF BARRÄCKS, & GUNS EMPLACEO• ZIGZAG TRENCH WITH FIRING BAŸS NM EAST: OF: BARRACKS AREA• AT LEAST 100• VEHICLES CARS AND TRUCKS) IN SHOPY WAREHOUSE/BARRACKS AREA. ONE TANK AND 25 MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES ELSEWHERE IN CAMP  3058 MCT 3 SEp 61 REPORTS SOUTHEAST EDGE OF MANAGUA. CAMP CONTAINS 15 ADMINESTRATION BUILDINGS, 1O BARRACKS, 6 VEHICLE SHEDS, 9 STORAGE BUILOINGS, ONE: 2 PROBABLE AMMUNITION BUNKER, ONE PROBABLE I AMMUNITION BUNKER UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH REINFORCEMENT TIMBERS IN PLACE, LOCATED 2 TOL NM ESE OF CADET SCHOOL BARRACKS, AT UTM LR394698, 16 SUPPORT BUILDINGS. DEFENSES INCLUDE -- ONE 6-GUN DP POSITION ON HILL JUST NW OF BARRACKS, 6 GUNS TEMPLACED. ONE: 6-GUN AA POSITION CU --- ## Page 162 26 Page 162 UNDER CONSTRUCTION OT NM SE OF BARRACKS 6 GUNS EMPLACEO. ONE 4-GUN AA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 157 NA SSE OF BARRACKS, 4 GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 3-GUN AA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION L.8 NM SOUTH OF BARRACKS: 3 GUNS EMPLACED ONE 6-GUN AA POSITION 1.6 NA WEST OF BARRACKS, 6 GUNS EMPLACED. ZIG-ZAG TRENCH WITH FIRING DAYS •SNE FASTTOE BARRACKS ARCA• AFFLEAST 89% VEHICLES AND 10 PROBABLE FIELD ARTILLERY PIECES IN WAREHOUSE/BARRACKS AREA. APPROXIMATELY 25 TENTS AT EAST. END: OF CAMP, T-SHAPED EXCAVATION IN PROGRESS AT UTM LR403669: NM WEST OF CADET SCHOOL BARRACKS. THREE PROBABLE ARMORED CARS AÑO § CANVAS-COVERED VEHICLES PARKED ON PARADE GROUND. CAMP CONTAINS MANAGUA AIRFIELD, WHERE NO AIRCRAFT WERE OBSERVED. RUNWAY IS UNDER: CONSTRUCTION. AND NOT SERVICEABLE. NO CRATES, RADAR OR ELECTRONICS OSSERVED. NO DEFENSES OBSERVEO. 3060 SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS SOUTHEAST EDGE OF MANAGUA• CAMP CONTAINS 15 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS, 10 BARRACKS, 6 VEHIGLE SHEDS, & STORAGE BUILDINGS, ONE PRODABLE AMMUNITION BUNKER, ONE CONCRETE: BUILDING IN EXCAVATION I02 NN ESE OF CADET SCHOOL BARRACKS, AT UTM LR394698, 16 SUPPORT BÜILDINGS. DEFENSES INCLUDE -- ONE 6GUN DP POSITION ON HILL JUST NW OF BARRACKS, & GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 6-GUN AA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 7 NM SE OF BARRACKS, & GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 4-GUN AA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.7 NM SSE OF BARRACKS, 4 GUNS: EMPLACED• ONE J-GUN AA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION LO8 NM SOUTH OF BARRACKS, 3 GUNS EMPLACED. ONE 6-GUN AA/ POSITION 1.6 NM WEST OF BARRACKS, 6 GUNS EMPLACED, ZIGZAG TRENCH WITH FIRING BAYS AS NM EAST OF BARRACKS AREA. DEAST 0O. VEHICLES AND 1a PROGABLE FIELD --- ## Page 163 DocId: 3262 7076 Page 163 ARTILLERY PIECES IN WAREHOUSE/BARRACKS AREA. APPROXIMATELY 25 TENTS AT EAST END: OF CAMP, T-SHAPED EXCAVATION IN PROGRESS AT UTM LR403660 1.3 NM WEST OF CADET SCHOOL BARRACKS. 3061 SITSUM 6 DEC 61 REPORTS SE EDGE OF MANAGUA. CAMP CONTAINS I5 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS, I& BARRACKS 6 VEHICLE SHEDS, 9 STORAGE BUILDINGS, ONE PROBABLE AMMUNITION BUNKERY 16 SUPPORT BUTLDINGS. T-SHAPED EXCAVATION IN PROGRESS AT UTM LR403660 1.3 NM WEST OF CADET SCHOOL BARRACKS. ONE CONCRETE U-SHAPEO BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN EXCAVATION 1.2 NM ESE OF CADET SCHOOL CARRACKS, AT UTM LR394698. DEFENSES -- ONE OCCUPIED G-GUN DP POSITION ON HILL JUST NW OF BARRACKS, ONE OCCUPIED G-GUN AAA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SE: OF BARRACKS. ONE OCCUPIED 4-GUN AAA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.7 N# SSE ÖF BARRACKS• ONE OCCUPIED 3-GUN AAA POSITION / UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.8 NA SOUTH OF BARRACKS• ONE OCCUPIED &-GUN AAA POSITION 206 NM WEST OF BARRACKS• ZIGZAG TRENCH WITH FIRING BAYS .5 NM EAST OF BARRACKS AREA. 4: 3062 SITSUM 19 JAN 62 REPORTS: :6 GUN UNOCCUPIED FA POSITION 2 NN-SOUTH SOUTHWEST OF BARRACK AREA. CONSTRUCTION OF AAA POSITIONS COMPLETE. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND RESURFACING ÖF RUNWAY STILL IN PROGRESS. NO OTHER CHANGE SINCE DECEMBER 1961. VEHICLES - - 13 PROBABLE TANKS, ONE POSSIBLE TANK, ONE UOS. TANK, 7 TRACTOR/TRAILERS, 50 CARGO TRUCKS, 4 PIECES OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND APPROXIMATELY 25 MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES. 3067 SITSUM 21 FEB 62 REPORTS NO MAJOR CHANGES OBSERVEO.: VEHICLES -- TOTAL OF 126 VEHICLES INCLUDING 9 TRACTOR/TRAILERS TRAILERSY Od CARGO TRUCKS, SEGRET --- ## Page 164 DocId 32 7026 Page 164 AND 60 MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3071 MOT 15 MAR 62 REPORTSU CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES. LONG NARROW BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION 09 NM SOUTH OF CADET SCHOOL. IN AREA WHERE T-SHAPED EXCAVATION WAS REPORTED ON MISSION 3061, DEC 611 THERE IS A LARGE FENCED AREA CONTAINING 2 LOOP ROADS• THERE ARE 2 EARTH- COVERED DRIVE-THROUGH STRUCTURES ON SMALUER ROAD AND ONE ON THE LARGER ROAD. A 6-GUN OCCUPIED DP EMPLACEMENT HAS A BATTERY OF 3 GUNS WITHIN THE LARGER LOOP ROAD AND A BATTERY OF 3 GUNS JUST WEST OF THE LOOP ROAD. JUST NORTH OF LOOP ROAD AND OUTSIDE THE FENCEO AREA YS A DIAMOND-SHAPED GROUND SCAR AND A LARGE CONCRETE STRUCTURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHICH MAY EVENTUALLY BE EARTH- COVERCO. THE T-SHAPEO EXCAVATION REPORTED IN MISSION 30610 IS NOT NOW EVIDENT. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN U-SHAPED BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1.2 NM ESE OF CADET SCHOOL SINCE MISSION 30610 DEC 610 HOWEVER, INMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THIS STRUCTURE THERE IS GROUNO SCARRING AND A COMPARISON OF MISSION 3045• APR GI, SHOWED THAT THERE WAS A LARGE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED STRUCTURE WHICH NOW IS APPARENTLY BURIED. DEFENSES -- A 6-GUN OP POSITION NN OF BARRACKS AREA - 2 EMPLACEMENTS OCCUPIED. A 6-GUN UNOCCUPTED FA POSITION UNDER CONSTRUCTION 2 NA SSH OF CADET SCHOOL• OTHER DEFENSES UNCHANGED SINCE MISSION. 3067, FEB 620 : 3078 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS CONSTRUCTION CONTINUES ON EARTH-COVERED BUILDINGS TO THE SOUTH AND DEFENSIVE POSITIONS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH. ONE NEW BUILDING, POSSIOLY A THEATER, UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON EAST EDGE OF BARRACKS AREA. VENICLES " APPROXIMATELY 10 ARMORED VEHICLES, 15 TANK TRANSPORTERS, 11O TRUCKS, SHORETI --- ## Page 165 DocId 32 7026 Page 165 AND 30 OTHER VEHICLES. APPROXIMATELY 11Q CARGO AND 30 MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES. = 3079. SITSUN 22 MAY 62 REPORTS VEHICLES: -- 14 TANK TRANSPORTERST S PROBASLE POL TRANSPORTERS, 285 TRUCKS+ ONE TRAILER VAN AND NUMEROUS SEDANS.X NER BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT OLD MOTOR POOL AREA. POSSIBLE THEATER BUILDING ALSO UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 3A8& SITSUN 6 JUN 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MAY 62. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON BUILDINGS. AT LEAST 26G TRUCKS, 14 TANK-TRANSPORTERS, 5 POSSIBLE POL TRANSPORTERS, AND NUMEROUS AUTOS. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE EARLY JUN 620 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON BUILDINGS. VEHICLES -- AT LEAST 200, PREDOMINATELY TRUCKS. NO TANKS NOTED. IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE BUILDING AREA A LARGE AREA IS BEING CLEARED FOR UNDETERMINEO PURPOSES. 30A5 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS MOTOR POOL BUILOING AND OUTDOOR THEATER APPEAR COMPLETE. CONSTRUCTION ON LARGE CONCRETE BUILDING AND 2 DRIVE-THROUGH STRUCTURES COMPLETE, BUT STRUCTURES HAVE NOT BEEN EARTH-COVERED. LARGE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION SOUTH OF BUILDINGS STILL BEING CLEARED AND LEVELEO IS PIECES OF EQUIPMENT? NOTED). DEHICLES/ COUTPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 200 VEHICLES, PREDOMINANTLY TRUCKS, PARKED AND IN USE THROUGHOUT FACILITY. NO APPARENT CHANGES IN AREA DEFENSES SINGE: TOM 624 S8090 --- ## Page 166 DocId: 3262 7076 Page 166 3886 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS VEHICLES - APPROXIMATELY 300 VEHICLES, PREDOMINANTLY TRUCKS, PARKED AND IN USE THROUGHOUT FACILITY. LARGE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION SOUTH OF BUILDING AREA STILL BEING CLEAREO AND LEVELED. NO OTHER CHANGES IN FACILITIES OR DEFENSES SINCE JUL 620 * 3088 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS DEFENSES -- NO CHANGE SINCE JUL 62. CONSTRUCTION SOUTH OF HILLS CONTINUING. NO: APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE VEHICLES -- APPROXIMATELY THROUGHOUT AREA. 350 VEHICLES --- ## Page 167 DocId: 32627026 Page 167 SERRETS MANATI SAM SITE CU 2113N 07702W 31A0 SITSUM 7OCT 62 REPORTS NM SW OF MANATI AT 21-13-45N 077-0215W SA-2 SAM SITE, UNREVETTED AND STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION, CONTAINING THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT - MISSILE LAUNCHERS, POSSIBLE FRUIT SET RADAR AND APPROXIMATELY 6 ASSOCIATED VEHICLES IN GUIDANCE AREA, 3 PROBABLE MISSILE-HOLD REVETMENTS EACH WITH 2 POSSIBLE MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, AND APPROXIMATELY 6 TENTS. SECRETS --- ## Page 168 DocId: 32627026 Page 4168 MANZANILLO AREA, MILITARY ACTIVITY 3098 SITSUM 5 OCT 62 REPORTS 2.8 NM SSE OF MANZANILLO.. AN AREA OF UNIDENTIFIEO MICITARY ACTIVITY CONTAINING 6 STORAGE/MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS, NUMEROUS SMALL TENTS, TO UNIDENTIFIEO VEHICLES, CONSIDERABLE TRACK ACTIVITY, TRENCH SYSTEMS AND SMALL ARMS EMPLACEMENTS. INMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE MANZANILLO CU. 2017N 7706W --- ## Page 169 DocId: 32627026 Page 169 • 1 MANZANILLO SAM SITER 3098 SITSUN 5 OCT 62 REPORTS 2.5 NM SSE OF MANZANILLO AT 20-18-20N 077-06-08W. SA-2 SAM SITE CONTATNING 6 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, 6 MISSILE LAUNCHERS, FRUIT SET RADAR WITH 5 VANS 9 UNIDENTIFICO VEHICLES+ 10 ADOITIONAL VANS, AND OPEN STORAGES ALL EOUIPMENT UNREVETTED. CU: 20ION 07706W --- ## Page 170 DocId: 326 27026 Page 170 MARTEL AREA, NAVAL AMMO STORAGE 3078 MCT 2 MAY 62 REPORTS •5 NM N# OF MARTEL NAVAL AIR STATION. PUNKER, ONE BUILDING. ROAD CONNECTS STORAGE AREA WITH AIR STATION. CU 2300N 08246W --- ## Page 171 EE MARTEL NAVAL AIR STATION • 3078: MCT 2 MAY 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE. DEFENSES TRENCH SYSTEM WITH SEVERAL AX POSITIONS AND: 3 OCCUPIED PROBABLE AAA EMPLACEMENTS ON SOUTH SIDE OF SH END OF RUNWAY. 3. EXCAVATIONS AT SW END OF RUNWAY. ARE PROBABLE BUNKERS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. TWO NEW PIERS ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON NORTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION• APPROXIMATELY 35 TRUCKS PARKED IN AREA& * 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE Z MAY 620 AIRCRAFT NONE • 1 • 3680 SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE OBSERVED. NO APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MAY 620 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUING ON 3 PROBABLE BUNKERS AND 2 NEW PIERS ON NORTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION. 0 3882 SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGE TO FACILITIES SINCE JUNE 520 AIRCRAFT -- NONE• CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING ON BUNKERS AND PIERS• 3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE• RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MAY 62. BUNKERS AND PIERS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION. 3094 SITSUM 8 JUL 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT - NONE& RUNWAY SERVICEABLE• NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES SINCE MAY 62. BUNKERS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION. NUMEROUS VENICLES PARKED ON SAPRON NEAR HANGAR. CU: 2300N 08246W Docta: 32627026 Page 171 --- ## Page 172 * 3085 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS AIRCRADE -- NONE. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE: SIX OCCUPIED LIGHT AAA POSITIONS JUST SOUTH OF RUNWAY. CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING ON 3 BUNKERS• ONE PIER ON NORTH SIDE OF AIRFIELD APPEARS COMPLETE, ONE PIER: STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION• NO OTHER CHANGE IN FACILITIES. 3086 SITSUM S AUG 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- NONE OBSERVED. CONSTRUCTION CONTINUES ON BUNKERS AND ONE PIER. NO CHANGE IN OTHER FACILITIES OR DEFENSES SINCE JUL 62. 3088. SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS RUNWAY SERVICEABLE• 24 CRATES (24 X 8 FF) AND 16 TRUCKS ON APRON• NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUL 62• CONSTRUCIION CONTINUING ON BUNKERS• (FOR INFORRATION ON MARIEL SAM SITED HARIEL MILITARY INSTALLATION, AND MARIEL NAVAL PORTO SEE SITUATION SUMMARY PART PAR R63-6201 Dootd: 32627026 Page 172 --- ## Page 173 •1 MARIEL NAVAL PORTA CU 2301N 08245W 0586 • G-3002, 27 OCT 68 REPORTS. NORTH EDGE OF MARIEL, NE SIDE OF MARIEL BAY. 4,500 FT OF PRINCIPAL WHARFAGE.. 1 PIER 680 FT LONG FOR LOADING CEMENT, I PIER 200 FT LONG, 1 PIER 190 FT LONG. NUMEROUS SMALLER PIERS-N MARINE RAILHAY L90 FT LONG. LARGE QUANTITY OF LOUSNES MATERIALS IN OPEN STORAGE ADJACENT TO WHARF ON NE STOE NEE OF BAY• SMALLER AMOUNT OF U/I MATERIALS ON LARGE RAIL-SERVED PIER JUST NORTH OF MARIEL G-3051, 28 JUNE 61e REPORTS. VESSELS -- ONE FREIGHTER AT LA BOCA PIER• ONE FREIGHTER AT LARGE PIER JUST NORTH OF MARTEL• ONE PATROL BOAT AT MARITIMAS MARIEL PIER. CARGO -- NONE OF SIGNIFICANCE OBSERVED. DEFENSES - APPROXIMATELY 3 UNOCCUPIED GUN POSITIONS ON LA BOCA SIDE OF HARBOR ENTRANCE. ONE 6-GUN FA POSITION AT 23-OON 082-47-47W• TRENCHING ACTIVITY EVIDENT 2•4 NM WNW OF MARIEL. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT - ONE POSSIBLE FIRECAN RADAR VANº 4 PROBABLE MILITARY VEHICLES, 5 UNIDENTIFIEO VEHICLES, AND APPROXIMATELY 68 CARGO TRUCKS ARE PARKED IN A FENCED FIELO NEXT TO A RECTANGULAR BUILDING AT 22-59-35N 082-45-15We NINE PROBABLE BOXCARS 5 PROBABLE TANK CARS ON PIER JUST NORTH OF MARIEL. • G-30549 29 JULY 61 REPORTS• A TOTAL OF 2 VESSELS ONE FREIGHTER, 359 FT LONG. AND ONE TANKER 390 FT LONGI BOTH AT LA BOCA PIER. NO SIGNIFICANT CARGOES, HARBOR DEFENSES OR OTHER ITEMS OF MILITARY SIGNIFICANCE. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.. • G-3067, 22 FEB 62 REPORTS. NO UNUSUAL CON- CENTRATIONS OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT: OR SUPPLY STOCKPILES OBSERVED. VESSELS -4 MOTOR TORPEDO BOATS, 2 PATROL VESSELS, 4 CARGO SHIPS. • G-3071, 15 MAR 62 REPORTS. SUBMARINES - NONE O SURFACE COMBATANT -- 4 KRONSHTAOI-CLASS PATROL CRAFTS 1173 FT. LONG) MOGREO ON SOUTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION. 4(83 FT LONG) PT BOATS MOORED ALONGSIDE UNLOENTIFIED SHIP (APPROXIMATELY 160 FT LONG) ON NORTH. OF NAVAL AIR STATIONS AUXILIARY/MERCHANT ME DocId: 32627026 Page 173 --- ## Page 174 BARGEST 3 UNIDENTIFIED SMALL CRAFT, 2 FREIGHTERS AT MARVEL MOLE. 2 BARGES AT NORTH PIER, NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT THROUGHOUT PORT• AMPHIBIOUS - NONE• LOGISTICS/MATERIEL -- SHIPPING CRATES AT MARIEL MOLE. • G-3074, 1 APR 62 REPORTS• SUBMARINES - NONE. SURFACE COMBATANT • -: 2 KRONSHTAOT-CLASS PATROL CRAFT AND 2 PT BOATS MOORED ON SOUTH SIDE, 2 KRONSHTADT- CLASS PATROL CRAFT AND 2 PT BOATS MOGREO ON NORTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION. 4 POSSIBLE PATROL CRAFT MOORED NW OF NAVAL AIR STATION. AUXILIARY/MERCHANT. CH ONE FREIGHTER IN HARBOR IMMEDIATELY EAST OF NAVAL AIRS STATION• ONE FREIGHTER AT MARIEL MOLE. 2 POSSIBLE BARGES MOORED AT MARIEL QUAY• 2 SMALL COASTAL CRAFT MOORED AT NORTH PIER• NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT THROUGHOUT HARBOR: LOGISTICS/MATERIEL -- LARGE STACKS OF 11 UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL ON MARTEL MOLE• SEVERAL SMALL STACKS OF UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL ON SOUTH PIER• NUMEROUS SMALL STACKS OF UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL ON MARANTE WHARVES. • G-3078, 2 HAY 62 REPORTS: NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MISSION 3002, 27 OCT 60• OPPOSITE CEMENT PLANT, 2 KRONSHTADI CLASS PATROL VESSELS AND 2 PT BOATS MOORED ON NORTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION. 4 POSSIBLE PC MOORED NW OF NAVAL AIR STATION. 2 KRONSHTADE CLASS PATROL VESSELS, 4 PT BOATS, AND ONE UNIDENTIFIEO SMALL CRAFT MOORED ON SOUTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION• 2 KRONSHTADT CLASS PATROL VESSELS AND ONE PT BOAT MOORED SW OF NAVAL AIR STATION• 4 PT BOATS MOGRED JUST SOUTH OF NORTHWEST END OF NAVAL AIR STATION RUNWAY• 2 FREIGHTERS MOOREO AT LARGE PIER JUST NORTH OF. MARIEL• 2 POWER-DARGES MOORED OPPOSITE CEMENT PLANT. ONE SMALL COASTAL VESSEL AT ANCHOR NORTHWEST OF MARIEL. NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT• NO AMPHIBIOUS-TYPE VESSELS. GESERVED• PIER NORTH OF MARIEL CONTAINS VARIETY OG UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL. VESSELS -- ONE EX-US PF-TYPE FRIGATE MOORED AT CEMENT PLANT PIER, 2 KRONSHTADT-CLASS PATROL VESSELS, AND 2 PT BOATS MOORED ON NORTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATIONS 4 PATROL CRAFT MOORED: NW OF NAVAL AIR STATION, 2. KRONSHTAOT-CLASS PATROL VESSELSO 4PT BOATS AND ONE UNIDENTIFIED SMALL CRAFT MOORED ON SOUTH SIDE OF NAVAL AIR STATION 2 KRONSTADT-CLASS AcId: 32627026 Page 174 --- ## Page 175 DocId : 32627026 Page 175 AND ONE PT BOAT KOORED SW OF NAVAL AIR STATION, 4 PT BOATS MOORED JUST SOUTH OF NW END OF NAVAL AIR STATION RUNWAY, 2 LARGE FREIGHTERS MOORED AT LARGE PIER JUST NORTH OF MARIEL: 2 POWER BARGES MOORED OPPOSITE CEMENT PLANT, ONE SMALL COASTAL VESSEL ANCHORED NORTH OF MARIEL, ONE SMALL VESSEL AT ANCHOR NORTH OF NAVAL AIR STATION, AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT. 6-3079, 22 MAY 62 REPORTS. VESSELS -- 2 FREIGHTERS AT PIER NEAR ENTRANCE TO HARBOR, 2 BARGES AT CEMENT PIER. ONE SMALL FREIGHTER ANCHORED IN BAY. Y PT, 4 KRONSMTADT AND ONE PROBABLE EX-US PCE DOCKED ON SOUTH SIDE OF AIRFIELD, 2 KRONSHTADT, 3 PT AND 2 COASTAL KERCHANT VESSELS DOCKED NORTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE PT ENTERING HARBOR. LOGISTICS/MATERIEL -- UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL ON MARIEL MOLE. 6-3080, 6 JUNE 62 REPORTS.. VESSELS -- 2 KRONSHTÄOT- CLASS DOCKED NORTH OF AIRFIELD. 3 KRONSHTADT-CLASSI ONE PATROL BOAT, 8 PT BOATS: SOUTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE EX- US PCE AND ONE BARGE AT CEMENT PIER. ONE LARGE MERCHANT SHIP AT WHARF AT MOUTH OF HARBOR, ONE LARGE MERCHANT SHIP AT WHARF JUST NORTH OF MARIEL. LOGISTICSI MATERIAL -- UNIDENTIFIED MATERIAL ON WHARF. 0-3082. 18 JUNE 62 REPORTS. VESSELS -- 2 LARGE CARGO, 3 SMALL CARGO, 1 EX-US PCE, 7 PT, 2 PATROL BOATS, 5 BARGES AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT. MINOR STOCKPILING OF UNIDENTIFIEO MATERIAL ON MARTEL WHARF. G-30631 29 JUNE BZ REPORTS. VESSELS -- ONE LARGE CARGO, 2 SMALL CARGO, 2 PATROL CRAFT, 9 PT BOATS, AND 5 BARGES. UNIDENTIFIEO MATERIAL ON WHARF AND PIER• G-3084, 8 JULY G2 REPORTS. VESSELS - TWO KRONSHTADT-CLASS DOCKED NORTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE KRONSHTADT-CLASS, ONE POSSIBLE KRONSHTADT-CLASS, 7 PT BOATS, AND TWO POSSIBLE PT BOATS DOCKED SOUTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE PROBABLE EX-US PF AND ONE CARGO SHIP DOCKED AT PIER NEAR CEMENT PLANT: TWO CARGO SHIPS DOCKED AT PIER ON SE SIDE OF HARBOR. UNIDENTIFIED MATERIAL ON WHARF ANO PIER. --- ## Page 176 DooId:326 27026 Page 176 G- 3985. JULY 62 REPORTS. VESSELS -- ONE PT AND ONE KRONSHTADT-CLASS MOORED NORTH OF AIRFIELD, 2 KRONSHTADT-CLASS AND 6 PT MOORED JUST SOUTH OF FIELD, ONE PF MOORED AT CEMENT PLANT PIER, ONE FREIGHTER MOORED AT MARIEL PIERS AND ONE FREIGHTER MOORED AT CEMENT PLANT PIER. NO CHANGE IN PORT FACILITIES. LOGISTICS/MATERIAL - UNIDENTIFIED MATERIAL STACKED ON MARIEL PIER. 3086 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS VESSELS - 2 FREIGHTERS, 2 KRONSHTAÖT-CLASS. AND 4 PT BOATS MOORED NORTH OF AIRFIELO: ONE KRONSHTADT-CLASS AND 4 PT BOATS MOOREO SOUTH OF AIRFIELD. ONE PT BOAT MOORED AT CEMENT PLANT PIER. NO CHANGE IN PORT FACILITIES SINCE JUL 62. •LOGISTICS/MATERIEL -- NONE OBSERVED. 6- 3088r 29 AUG 62 REPORTSI VESSELS - 13 PT BOATS MOORED NORTH AND SOUTH OF AIRFIELD OF WHICH 7 ARE KOMAR-CLASS (GUIDED MISSILE BOATS) AND ONE IS PROBABLY IN PROCESS OF CONVERSION. ONE UNIDENTIFIED VESSEL SW OF NAVAL PIER AND ONE UNIDENTIFIED VESSEL, APPROXIMATELY 270 X 50 FT, AT NAVAL PIER. ONE FREIGHTER AT MARIEL PIER WITH 11 LARGE TRUCKS, 14 MEDIUM TRUCKS AND UNIDENTIFIED RATERIAL ON PIER. TWENTY-FOUR CRATES 124 X 8 FTI AND 1G TRUCKS ON APRON AT AIRFIELD. --- ## Page 177 DocId: 32627026 Page 177 MARIEL SAM SITE G-30088 29 AUG 62 REPORTS: 2.8 NM WNW OF MARIEL AIRFIELD AT 23-00-55N 082-49-384. SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION• SIX UNREVETTED LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH LAUNCHERS 12 LAUNCHERS HAVE CANVAS OR NET COVERING), FRUIT SET RADAR WITH 6 ASSOCIATED VANS, 6 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERS, APPROXIMATELY 20 VEHICLES, AND 2 TENTS. 1,20O YOS WEST OF MARIEL SA-Z SITE IS A HEADQUARTERS AREA CONSISTING OF 4 ONE-STORY BUILDINGS AND A STORAGE AREA WITH IL STORAGE BUILDINGS AND ONE H-SHAPED BUILDING. VEHICLES -- SEVENTEEN SMALL TRUCKS, TRAILERS, 13 JEEPS, 12 LARGE TRUCKS, II SMALL TRAILERS, 16 POSSIBLE ARMORED CARSA 6 LARGE AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRATES, & TENTS. AND 20 UNIDENTIFIEC VEHICLES IN OPEN STORAGE VESSELS -M 4 PATROL CRÄFT AT ANCHOR ARROYO DONA MARIAr 3 ARE APPROXIMATELY 6A X 1O FT AND ONE 50 X LA FT. CU 2300N 08249W 0586 --- ## Page 178 DocId: 32627026 Page 178 MATANZAS AREA, MILITARY ACTIVITY CU. 2303N 08135W 3078 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OR EQUIPMENT BUILDUP NOTED. NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES AT CIUDAD MILITAR, INSTITUTO CIVICO MILITAR OR IN AREA DEFENSES SINCE MAR 62• APPROXIMATELY 62- CARS AND 5 TRUCKS NOTED AT CIUDAD MILITAR. THE 6 FA POSITIONS 300. FT NE OF THE MICROWAVE TOWER CONE NM NORTH OF MATANZAS) ARE UNOCCUPIED• 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY O2 REPORTS APPARENT BUILDUP OF MILITARY EQUIFMENT TROOPS. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES AT CIUDAD MILITARY, INSTITUTO CIVICO MILITAR, OR IN AREA DEFENSES SINCE 2 MAY 62. VEHICLES -- APPROXIMATELY 41 CARS, ONE TRUCK AND ONE BUS NOTED AT CIUDAD MILITAR. --- ## Page 179 DocId 371 7026 Page 179 239227 MATANZAS AREA. MILITARY ACTIVITY CU 2303N 08135W MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OR EQUIPMENT BUILDUP NOTED. NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES AT CIUDAD MILITAR, INSTITUTO CIVICO MILITAR OR IN AREA DEFENSES SINCE MAR 62. APPROXIMATELY 62. CARS AND 5 TRUCKS NOTED AT CIUDAD MILITAR. THE 6 FA POSITIONS 30B. FT. NE OF THE MICROWAVE TOWER CONE NA NORTH OF MATANZAST ARE UNOCCUPIED• 3079.SITSUM 22 MAY 6Z REPORTS APPARENT BUILDUP OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT OR TROOPS. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES AT CIUDAD MILITARY, INSTITUTO CIVICO MILITAR, OR IN AREA DEFENSES SINCE 2 KAY 62. VEHICLES -- APPROXIMATELY 41 CARS, ONE TRUCK AND ONE BUS NOTED AT CIUDAD MILITAR. --- ## Page 180 DocId 32627026 Page 180 MATANZAS; PORT FACILITIES 3078 MCI 2 MAY 52 REPORTS AUXILIARY/HERCHANT VESSELS - 2 LARGE FREIGHTERS AT DUBROCO WHARF, AND ONE OREOGER IN OPERATION BETWEEN ARMOUR PIER AND NEW PIER. UNIDENTIFIED MATERIEL STORED ON CUSTOMS QUAY AND DUBROCO WHARF: NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE APR 62. 3079 SITSUN 22 MAY 62 REPORTS AUXILIARY/MERCHANT 2 LARGE FREIGHTERS AT DUBROCQ WHARF, ONE SMALL FREIGHTER AT DISTILLING PIER, ONE LARGE FREIGHTER AT ARMOUR PIER, ONE LÄRGE FREIGHTER DOCKED IN BAY AND ONE DREDGE NEAR TEXAS PIER. ROAD UNDER IMPROVEMENT ON NW SIDE OF BAY. 3080 SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS VESSELS -- 2 LARGE FREIGHTERS AT DUBROCQ WHARF, ONE LARGE FREIGHTER AT NEW PIER, ONE DREDGE NEAR NEW PIER. NO CHANGES IN FACILITIES OBSERVEO. 3082 SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES. • VESSELS -- ONE CARGO SHIP• INCOMPLETE INFO. 3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS - 2 FREIGMTERS AT DUBROCO WHARF, EACH APPROXIMATELY 435 FT LONG, AND ONE SMALL SHIP AT NEW WHARF. NO APPARENT CHANGE TO FACILITIES SINCE FEB G2. 02979 DIJ1a1 --- ## Page 181 DocId: 32627026 Page 181 3085 5173U1 12 JUL 62 REPORTS VESSELS -I ONE PIPELINE DREOGE NEAR ARMOUR PIER, ONE CARGO VESSEL AT NEW MOLASSES PIERS ONE SMALL CARGO VESSEL AT CUBA DISTILLING PIER, 2 CARGO VESSELS AT DUBROCO WHARFO A FEW SMALL CRAFT SCATTERED IN HARBOR AREA. AND NUMEROUS SMALL CRAFT BERTHED AND ANCHORED IN RIO SAN JAUN. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE FEB MATERIEL/EQUIPMENT -- NO CONCENTRATIONS OBSERVEO IN MARBOR AREA. 3686 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS VESSELS -- 3 FREIGHTERS, ONE AT DUBROGG WHARF AND 2 AT NEW WHARF• ONE DREDGE NEAR ARMOUR PIERO SMALL CRAFT SCATTEREO IN HARBOR. ONE FREIGHTER OUTBOUND 3 NM NE OF MATANZAS. RAIL CARS -- 35 BOXCARS NOTED IN AREA NEAR NEW WHARFE 9 POSSIBLE TANK CARS NEAR STORAGE TANKS+ 56 POSSIBLE TANK CARS NORTH OF FERTILIZER PLANT. VEMICLES -- CONVOY OF & MILITARY TRUCKS HEADING NE ON ROAD NEAR SHORELINE AT DUBROCO WHARF• NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE FEB 62. 3088 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS VESSELS -- ONE FREIGHTER DOCKED AT MOLASSES PIER. VEHICLES - APPROXIMATELY 22 TRUCKS PARKED AT DUBROCO WHARF. NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUL 62. Dinardorm --- ## Page 182 DocId: 32627026 Page 182 MATANZAS SAM SITE 6-3088, 29 AUG 62 REPORTS. 5 NM ESE OF MATANZAS AT 23-61-50N (981-29-1410 SA-2 SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. 5IX UNREVETTED LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH 6 LAUNCHERS. FRUIT SET RADAR INSTALLEO WITH 4 ASSOCIATED VANS, 6 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED AGQUISITION RADAR. TRAILERS, POSSIBLE AT LEAST I2 VANS OR VEHICLES. PROBABLE STAR CONFIGURATION. CU 2301N 08129W CO00sy --- ## Page 183 DooId: 32627026 Page 183 MINAS DEL FRIO, POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION CAMP CU 2000N 07659W 3078 MCT 2 MAY 62 REPORTS AREA NO LONGER BELIEVEO TO DE A MILITARY CAMP. IT IS PROGABLY A ROAD CONSTRUCTION CAMPETINO.. NO EVIDENCE OF MILITARY ACTIVITY OF ANY 3479 SITSUM 22 MAY G2 REPORTS CHANGE SINGE 2 MAY 620 3082 SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS NO MILITARY ACTIVITY OR CONCONTRATIONS NOTED. INCOMPLETE INFO. J2G.1 --- ## Page 184 DocId: 32627026 Page 184 NUEVITAS, SUSPECT MISSILE AREA SOVIET PERSONNEL REPORTED IN THE AREA. DATE OF INFO. OCT 62 3100 SITSUM 7 OCT 62 REPORTS SENADO SAM SITED 17 NM WNW OF NUEVITAS. • NO OTHER MISSILE ACTIVITY NOTEO WITHIN 16-NM RADIUS OF NUEVITAS. CU 2133N 07715W 820307 --- ## Page 185 DocId: 32627026 Page 185 PALMA SORIANO AREA, MILITARY INSTALLATION CU Z01ON A7600W 3078 MCI Z MAY 62 REPORTS 308 NM SOUTH OF PALMA SORIANO. BARRACKS, ONE BUTLOING FOUNDATION: 3 SUPPORT BUILOINGS AND APPROXIMATELY 25 AN POSITIONS ALONG PERIMETER FENCE: MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS OR EQUIPMENT NOTED. _SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS CHANGE SINCE 2 MAY 62. 3HAN SITSUM BARRACKS. & JUN 62 REPORTS SUPPORT BUILDINGS, APPROXIMATELY 25 AW POSITIONS ALONG PERIMETER FENCES AND SEVERAL PERSONNEL TRENCHES. VEHICLES = ONE TRUCK. NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED. 3081 SITSUM 15 JUN 62 REPORTS APPARENT CHANGES NOTEO SINCE MAY 02. 3083 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS APPARENT CHANGE SINCE MAY 02. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- NOME. --- ## Page 186 DocId: 32627026 Page 186 SECRET PLAYA BARACOA AIRFIELD CU 2302N 082354 RELATIVELY SMALL AIRFIELD NEAR AIR AND NAVAL TRAINING FACILITIES. THIS IS THE MAIN HELICOPTER LOCATION IN CUBA.. 3002 SITSUM 27 OCT 60 REPORTS 305 NM SW OF SANTA FE. 5,400 X 150 FT NNE/SSW PROBABLE BLACKTOR RUNWAY. LISTED IN ASSOTWO VOL GO JAN GL. TOTAL OF 12 AIRCRAFT -- ONE C-47, ONE LIAISON, 6 HOUND, 3 HARE, AND ONE POSSIBLE HARE. RUNWAY IS SERVICEABLE. 8 SHIPPING CRATES (MEASURING 25 X 14 FTL, 4 PROBACLE POL TRUCKS, AND APPROXIMATELY 10 MISCELLANEQUS VEHICLES. NO ELECTRONICS INSTALLATION OBSERVED. DEFENSES INCLUDE TWO 4-GUN AND ONE 3-GUN AAA POSITIONS (UNOCCUPIED) ANO ONE POSSIBLE 3-GUN AAA POSITION (UNOCCUPIEDI. ONE 5-GUN CD POSITION (PROBABLY OCCUPIED) IS LOCATED YO WNW OF THE AIRFIELO. 3054 SITSUM 29 JUL 61 REPORTS PROBABLE HOUND OBSERVED. POSSIOLE NEW CONSTRUCTION ON RAMP IN FRONT OF CONTROL TOWER, AND PROBABLE NEW HANGAR U/C• INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3058 MCI • 3 SEP 61 REPORTS A TOTAL OF LO AIRCRAFT OBSERVED--I C-47% 7 HOUND, 2 HARE • RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. TWELVE 25 X 1A FT CRATES, NUMEROUS SMALLER CRATES. NO ELECTRONICS OUSERVED. ONE 3-GUN AAA POSITION (UNOCCUPIED) -TWO-POSSIOLE 4-GUN AAA POSITION (UNOCCUPIEDI ONE POSSIBLE 3-GUN AAA --- ## Page 187 DocId: 32627026 Page 187 3060 SITSUM 26 OCT 61 REPORTS 54400 X 150 FT NNE/SSW BLACKTOP RUNWAY. SERVICEABLE• NO ELECTRONICS OBSERVED: 3-GUN AAA POSITION (UNOCCUPIEDI. THO POSSIELE A-GUN AAA POSITIONS (UNOCCUPIEDI ONE POSSIBLE 3-GUN AAA POSITION UNGICCUPLEDI A TOTAL OF 12 INCLUDING, 6 HOUNDS. HARES, AND ONE C-47. VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT - B TRUCKS, 6 SMALL VEHICLES APPROXIMATELY 5 POSSIBLE LARGE SHIPPING CRATES, AND 7 SMALL SHIPPING CRATES. 30G1 SITSUM 6 DEC 6I REPORTS RUNWAY SERVICEABLE• HARDSTAND IN FRONT OF MAIN HANGAR BEING RESURFACED. NEW HANGAR IN LATE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION ON SOUTH END OF AIRFIELD. CONSTRUCTION GRAVEL DUMPED ON SOUTH END OF 4 SHIPPING CRATES. DEFENSES - TWO 3-GUN OCCUPIED AAA POSITIONS, ONE 3-GUN UNOCCUPIED AAA POSITIONA AND ONE 4-GUN UNOCCUPIED AAA POSITION• AIRCRAFT -- 9 HARE, 2 HOUND, AND ONE C-47: 3062 SITSUM 19 JAN 62 REPURTS RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. HANGAR UNDER CONSTRUCTION• FOUR (4) PROB SHIPPING CRATES. AIRCRAFT - TOTAL OF 17. INCLUDING (2). CRATE, HOUND, (7) HARE AND (1) C-47. DEFENSES -- FOUR (4) 3 GUN UNOCCUPIED AAA POSITIONS. SITSUM 2 FEB 62 REPORTS RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 3 INCLUDING Z CRATE AND 1 C-47• INCOMPLETE INFORMATION• 3067- SITSUM 21 FEB 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 8 INCLUDING 2 HOUND. 4 HARE, ONE C-47, ONE CRATE. * ... --- ## Page 188 DocId: 326 7026 Page 188 3071 MCI IS MAR 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGE IN RUNWAY, FACILITIES, OR DEFENSES SINCE MISSION 3062, JAN 62. AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 17 INCLUDING, 2 CRATER ONE C-47, & HOUND. S HARED 2 HELICOPTER FUSELAGES, ONE UNIDENTIFIED DERELICT. 3674 SITSUM APR 62 AIRCRAFT -- 2 CRATED ONE C-47, ONE HOUND, 3 POSSIBLE MARE. DEFENSES -- ONE UNOCCUPIED 3 GUN AAA POSITION INCOMPLETE INFORMATION• 3078 MCI 2 MAY 62 REPORTS CONSTRUCTION WORK STILL IN PROGRESSO THE TWO 3-GUN AAA POSITIONS AT THE SOUTH END OF RUNWAY ARE OCCUPIED. AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 20 INCLUDING, ONE C-47. 2 CRATE, 8 MARE, 6 HOUND, Z FUSELAGES (HELICOPTERS, AND ONE UNIDENTIFIEO SE. ONE UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE-ENGINE• DEFENSES -- 2 OCCUPIED LIGHT 3-GUN AAA POSITIONS JUST SOUTH OF AIRFIELD, ONE UNOCCUPIED LIGHT 3-GUN AAA POSITIONS NORTH OF OPERATIONS BUILDINGe AND ONE UNOCCUPIEO LIGHT 3-GUN AAA POSITIONS EAST OF RUNWAY. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. NEW HANGAR UNDER CONSTRUCTION, APPROXIMATELY 90 PERCENT COMPLETED. PARKING APRON NEAR NEW HANGAR IS BEING SURFACEO. Z NEW BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION NEAR NORTH END UF RUNWAY. NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED. 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 149 INCLUDING 2 CRATE, ONE C-47. 7 HOUND CONE KITHOUT ROTORSI, 3 HARE CONE WITHOUT ROTORS), ONE UNTDENTIFIED SINGLE ENGINE. DEFENSES =- NO CHANGE SINCE 2 MAY 62. RUNWAY SERVICEABLE. 2 NEW BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION NEAR NORTH END OF RUNWAY. NEH APPEARS TO BE COMPLETED. PARKING AREA NEAR NEW HANGAR IS BEING SURFACED. ! TROOP CONCENTRATION NOTEO. SB0221 --- ## Page 189 DocId: 326 706 Page 189 6 JUN G2 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- I HARE AND ONE CRATE OBSERVED. 2 BUILDINGS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT NORTH END OF RUNWAY. HANGAR COMPLETE. SURFACING CONTINUING ON PARKING APRON. NO APPARENT CHANGE IN DEFENSES, NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS OBSERVED. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION• 3082 SITSUM ..LE JUN 62 REPORTS APPARENT CHANGE TO FACILITIES. AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF LA INCLUDING -- 1 C-47 3 HOUND, 3 HARE AND 3 POSSIBLE ZLIN-TRENER ALSO 2 HARE FUSELAGES. APPROXIMATELY 40 SHIPPING CRATES 120 _ FT SQUARE) • --- ## Page 190 DocId: 32627026 Page 190 SAGUA LA GRANDE EN/GI RADAR, INSTALN U/C 3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS 2.7 NM NNW OF CENTER OF SAGUA LA GRANDE AT 22-58-50N 886-05-42H. TWO ELEVATEO POSITIONS, 8 LARGE TENTS, 4 MEDIUM AND 6 TENTS, ANO APPROXIMATELY 12 VEHICLES. INSTALLATION •8 NM SE OF THE SAGUA LA GRANDE SA-2 SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. CU 22501 080051 --- ## Page 191 DocId: 32627026 Page 191 LA SITE CU G- 3088, 29 AUG 52 REPORTS. NO NEW CONSTRUCTION OR MISSILE ACTIVITY NOTED WITHIN LO NA RADIUS OF SAGUA LA GRANDE. 3089 SITSUM S SEP 62 REPORTS 2.9 NM NNW OF SAGUA LA GRANDE AT 22-51-10N 080-05-50W.. SA-2 SAM SITE, STAR CONFIGURATION, UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SIX LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH CANVAS/NET-COVERED LAUNCHERS, 3 UNOCCUPIED MISSILE-HOLD POSITIONS. FRUIT SET RADAR WITH APPROXIMATELY 6 ASSOCIATED VANS" POSSIBLE ACQUISITION RADAR. APPROXIMATELY VEHICLES. 2251N Đ80050 --- ## Page 192 DocId: 32627026 Page 192 _ SAN ANTONIO DE LOS BANOS AIRFIELD CU 2252N 3885 SITSUM 1Z JUL 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 45. INCLUDING 14 FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 PROBABLE MIDGETO 2 FARMERS 2 T-33, ONE LIAISON, ONE HOUND, 3 PROBABLE T-G, 12 B-26 (INCLUDING 2 PROBABLE DERELICTI, ONE PROBABLE SEA FURY. 5 UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE-ENGINE FIGHTERS, AND 2 UNIDENTIFIED 12 ADDITIONAL POSSIBLE EMPLACEMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTIONI, ONE OCCUPIED 3-GUN POSITION ON WEST SIDE OF NIS RUNWAY, JUST SOUTH OF RUNWAY INTERSECTION, ONE 3-GUN PROBABLY OCCUPIED POSITION ON EAST SIDE OF MIS TAXIWAY ON WEST SIDE OF FIELD. ONE OCCUPIEO 3-GUN POSITION AT SOUTH END OF N/S RUNWAY. 2 MAY 62 REPORTS CHANGES NOTED FROM MISSION 300Le DEC 61 ARE AS FOLLOWS• POSSIBLE GOA EQUIPMENT NEAR SOUTH END OF NE/SW RUNWAY HAS BEEN REMOVED. FIVE AW POSITIONS AT WEST END OF NEISW RUNWAY. THREE -AN POSITIONS AT NORTH END OF NWISE RUNWAY. ONLY 2 POSITIONS REMAIN OF THE & GUN AAA AT NE END OF NE/SW RUNWAY: ONE SMALL REVETTEO CORRUGATEO HANGAR AT WEST END OF NE/SW RUNWAY• SMALL CORRUGATED HANGARS: ALONG HARDSTAND OFF TAXIWAY PARALLELING NE/SW RUNWAY ON NORTH SIDE. AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 50 INCLUDING 21 FAGOT/ FRESCO, ONE FARMER, 12 8-26, ONE AERO COMMANDER, 3 T-33, ONE HOUND, 11 UNIDENTIFIED DEFENSES -- ONE UNOCCUPIED AAA SITE ADJACENT TO SW END OF NE/SW RUNWAY. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MAR 6ZO NO 68231N € 20.21 --- ## Page 193 DocId: 32627026 Page 193 SECURITY NOTEO. TOKEN EW/GCI UNIT SOUTH OF SE END OF NWISE. RUNWAY. AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES OBSERVED. NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED. 3079 SITSUM 22 MAY 6Z REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 45. INCLUDING -- 15 FRESCO/FAGOTS, ONE FARMER+ 10 B-261 2 DERELICT B-260 7 UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE ENGINE, 5 LIAISON, 3 T-33, ONE HOUND, ONE AEROCOMMANDER• NO CHANGE IN DEFENSES, RADAR, AND OTHER FACILITIES SINCE 2 MAY 62O NO TROOP CONGENTRATION OR AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES OBSERVED. NO SECURITY NOTED. FIVE NEW COVEREO REVETMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, 2 ALONG AW/SE RUNWAY, 2 ON NORTH SIDE OF NE/SH RUMWAY, AND ONE ON SOUTH SIDE OF NE/SW RUNWAY. 3000 SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 53, INCLUDING 21 FAGOTT MIDGET, 2 FARMER, 10 B-269 2 DERELICT B-26, 4 T-33, 6 PROBABLE SEA FURY, I LIAISON, ONE HOUND. 4 AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES. THE 5 NEW, COVEREO AIRCRAFT REVEMENTS ARE STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION. NO TROOP CONCENTRATION OBSERVED. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE MAY 62. 3082 SITSUM 18 JUN 62 REPORTS NO CHANGE TO FACILITIES. RUNWAYS SERVICEABLE. AIRCRAFT -- A TOTAL OF 23 INCLUDING -- 14 FAGOT/FRESCO, I FARMER, 2 T-33, 2 B-26 AND 4 LIAISON. INCOMPLETE INFO. = 3983 SITSUM 29 JUN 82 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 37, INCLUDING 2 FARMER, 14 FAGOT/FRESCO, 11 B-26, 2 T-33, ONE HELICOPTER, 3 LIAISON, 3 UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE-ENGINE, ONE DERELICT B-26, AND NUMEROUS OTHER DERELICTS IN SCRAP PILE. RUNHAYS SERVICEADLE. THE 5 NEW COVERED REVETMENTS ARE STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION. --- ## Page 194 NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES OR DEFENSES SINCE MAY 620 3084 SITSUM 8 JUL 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 37e INCLUDING 12 B-269 3 LIAISONe ONE UNIDENTIFIED SINGLE-ENGINE STRAIGHT-WINGE AND 5 AIRCRAFT FUSELAGESE 2 WITH WINGS AND NO TAILe 3 WITHOUT WINGS. RUNWAYS CLEAR AND SERVICEABLE, 800 FT EXTENSION TO NIS RUNWAY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. TWO POSSIBLE 24 FI GRATES NEAR WAREHQUSES. NO RADAR OR OTHER ELECTRONIGS NOTED. DEFENSES INCLUDE ONE G-GUN AA POSITION CONE POINT OCCUPIED) AT SW END OF NEISW RUNWAY, UNOCCUPIED 3- GUN POSITION SW OF 6-GUN POSITIONS ONE OCCUPIED 4-GUN POSITION NW OF INTERSECTION OF RUNWAYS, SINGLE-ENGINE TRAINERS• 5 AIRCRAFT SHIPPING CRATES, 30 FI IN LENGTH. NO CHANGE IN AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS, FACILITIES. OR DEFENSES SINCE EARLY JUL 62. TOKEN RADAR IN PLACE. 3086 SITSUM 5 AUG 62 REPORTS •AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 440 INCLUDING 12 =:B-26, 2 FARMER, 17 FAGOT/FRESCO, 2 PROBABLE T-33, 5 UNIDENTIFIEO SINGLE-ENGINE* 3 PROBABLE T-DO AND 3 LIAISON. INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. 3488 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS AIRCRAFT -- TOTAL OF 30, INCLUDING 16 FAGOT/ FRESCOA 2 POSSIBLE MIDGET. 12 B-26 12 • ONE AERO COMMANDER. ENGINE PISTON• 10 PROBABLE AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION NE CORNER OF AIRFIELD. 9 PROBABLE AIRCRAFT REVETMENTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION SE CORNER OF AIRFIELD. Dockd: 32627026: Page 194 --- ## Page 195 # 1 SAN JULIAN AIRFIELD SAM SITE * G-30889 29 AUG 62 REPORTS. •2 NM SE OF SAN JULIAN AIRFIELD RUNWAY INTERSECTION AT 22-05-28N 084-08-58W• SA-Z SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SIX LAUNCHERS• 6 CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE TRAILERSO G VANSA AND 9 TENTS• FIVE LAUNCHERS IN PROCESS OF BEING REVETTED. CENTRAL GUIDANCE AREA CONTAINING VANS PROBABLE FRUIT SET RADAR IS REVETTED. CU 2205N 08409W DocId: 32627026 Page 195 --- ## Page 196 SANCTI SPIRITUS SAM SITE CU 2147N 07929W SOVIET SHIPS APPARENTLY UNLOADED AT CASILDA AND THEIR CARGOS TRANSPORTED THROUGH TRINIDAD DIRECTION OF SANCTI SPIRITUS. DESTINATION MAY BE THE SANTA CLARA AIR BASEO G- 38880 29 AUG 62 REPORTS. NO UNUSUAL CONSTRUCTION OR MISSILE ACTIVITY NOTED • INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. • 3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS 6.5 N# SSW OF SANCTI SPIRITUS AT 21-47-45N 079-29-30W. UNREVETTED SA-Z SAM SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION: STAR CONFIGURATIONS SIX LAUNCH POSITIONS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND 6 TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERSO 11 VEHICLES IN GUIDANCE AREA• THREE TENTS AND ID VEHICLES NEARBY. DecId: 32627026 Page 196 --- ## Page 197 SANCTI SPIRITUS - CIENFUEGOS HIGHWAY CU 2156N 87926H HIGHWAY FROM SANCTI SPIRITUS (2I5GN-B7926W) TO SANTA CLARA (2225N-27957W) TO CIENFUEGOS (2209N-08027H) • 3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REPORTS CONVOY TRAVELING NWO 4.5 NM SE OF PLACETAS. CONSISTING OF 5 LOWBOY TRACTOR-TRAILERS EACH WITH ONE POSSIBLE CANVAS-COVERED TANK. TWO OTHER TRUCKS TOWING UNIDENTIFIED EQUIPMENT• HIGHWAY FROM SANTA CLARA TO CIENFUEGOS -- INCOMPLETE INFORMATION: DocId: 32627026 Page 197 --- ## Page 198 u301L1 SANTA CLARA AREA SEARCH SOVIET SHIPS APPARENTLY UNLOADED AT CASILDA AND THEIR CARGOES TRANSPORTED THROUGH TRINIDAD IN DIRECTION OF SANTA CLARA. DESTINATION MAY BE THE SANTA 3089 SITSUM 5 SEP 62 REFORTS NO MISSILE-RELATEO ACTIVITY NOTED. MILITARY INSTALLATION 2•3 NM SSE OF CENTER OF SANTA CLARA CONSISTS OF ONE LARGE H-SHAPED BUILDING, ONE 3- SECTION ADMINISTRATIVE-TYPE BUILDING. AND & SUPPORT BUILDINGS• APPROXIMATELY 9 VEHICLES. AREA FENCED. FIELO ARTILLERY TRAINING AREA 3.9 NM SW OF CENTER OF TOWN CONSISTING. OF THREE AREAS AS FOLLONS -- AREA LA 18 FIELD ARTILLERY EMPLACENENTS, 18 PRIME MOVERS 112 HAVE PROSABLE HOWITZERS ATTACHEDI. AREA 2. BARRACKS AREA WITH AT LEAST 8 BARRACKSO SEVERAL SMALL SUPPORT BUILDINGS.: SMALL TRENCHES, AND SMALL ARMS EMPLACEMENTS: AREA 3A NO ACTIVITY OBSERVED. TANK TRAINING AREA 4.7 NM SSE OF CENTER OF TOWN -- APPROXIMATELY 18 CANVAS COVERED PROBABLE TANKSA 12 SUPPORT BUILOINGS, AT LEAST 15 EXCAVATIONS FOR TANK TRAINING. GU 2225N 07957H Daisin DocId: 32627026 Page 198 --- ## Page 199 SANTA CLARA MILITARY AREAS 3080 SITSUM & JUN 62 REPORTS 2•5 NH SH OF SANTA CLARA. MILITARY COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 4 SEPARATE INSTALLATIONS - AL TRAINING AREA AT 22-23-15N 080-08-45H CONTAINS & SUPPORT BUILDINGS (EA X 20 FTIO 8 UNOCCUPIED FA POSITIONS Y TRUCKS AND 5 AUTOS. B) TRAINING AREA AT 22-22-09N 080-04-156 CONTAINS 6 SUPPORT BUILDINGS 190 X 15 FT/P 18 UNOCCUPIEO FA POSITIONS, AND 26 TRUCKS. C) BARRACKS AREA AT 22-23-DON 08A-01-20W CONTAINS 18 BUILDINGS, INCLUDING ONE ADMINISTRATIVE: 6 BARRACKS, 2 ADMINISTRATIVE/ SUPPORT BUILDINGSA 5 PROBABLE ADMINISTRATIVE/ BARRACKS BUILDINGS, AND 29 TRUCKS. O1 VEHICLE PARK AREA AT 20-22-30N 680-09-554 CONTAINS 7 BUILDINGS, 8 PRIME MOVERSE TRUCKS. CU 2223N 08001W Roe Id: 32627026 Page 199 --- ## Page 200 SANTA CLARA MILITARY AREAS 3080 SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS 2•5 NM SW OF SANTA CLARA. MILITARY COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 4 SEPARATE INSTALLATIONS - AL TRAINING AREA AT 22-23-15N 080-00-45K CONTAINS & SUPPORT BUILDINGS (88 X 20 FIle 8 UNOCCUPIEO FA POSITIONS, Y TRUCKS AND S AUTOS. TRAINING AREA AT 22-22-09N 080-00-15W CONTAINS & SUPPORT BUILDINGS 190 X 15 FTI. 18 UNOCCUPIEO FA POSITIONS, AND 26 TRUCKS. BARRACKS AREA AT 22-23-DON 088-01-20W CONTAINS L8 BUILDINGS, INCLUDING ONE ADMINISTRATIVE, 6 BARRACKS, 2 AOMINISTRATIVE/ SUPPORT BUILDINGS, 5 PROBABLE ADMINISTRATIVE/ BARRACKS HUILDINGS, AND 29 TRUCKS. D) VEHICLE PARK AREA AT 20-22-30N 080-49-554 CONTAINS.. TRUCKS. I BUILDINGS, 8 PRIME MOVERSE AND 22 CU 2223N 08201W DocId: 32627026 Page 200 --- ## Page 201 SANTA CLARA, MILITARY INSTALLATION CU 222214 0795711 3078 MCI 2 MAY UZ REPORTS SANTA CLARA, MILITARY INSTALLATION NO CHANGE SINCE MISSION 3071, 15 MAR 62• VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 20 TANKS. NO TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NOTED. 308A SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE APR 61. NO VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT OBSERVED• 3985 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS ONE NM SE UF SANTA CLARA. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE APR 610 VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 3 TRUCKS. * 3088 SITSUM 29 AUG 62 REPORTS NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE SINCE JUNE 62. TANK TRAINING AREA AT 22-20N 879-56W 5 NM SW OF SANTA CLARA. NO VEHICLES OBSERVED. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES. DOcId: 32627026 Page 201 --- ## Page 202 SANTA CLARA AREAR TANK TRAINING CỤ 2220N R7956H 3879 SITSUM 22 MAY O2 REPORTS NO MAJOR CHANGES SINCE JAN 62• NO ACTIVITY OBSERVED• NO TROOP CONCENTRATION• MILITARY EQUIPMENT -- 13 TANKS, AND 7 SPS IN TANK TRAINING AREA• 38BO SITSUM 6 JUN 62 REPORTS NO APPARENT CHANGE IN FACILITIES • SINCE MAY 62. 13 TANKS IN AREA: • 3883 SITSUM 29 JUN 62 REPORTS VEHICLES - 14 TANKS. 7 PROBABLE PROPELLED GUNSA ONE TRUCK. AND 2 SMALL VEHICLES, POSSIBLY JEEP-TYPE. AT LEAST 18 SUPPORT BUILDINGS AND 20 DUG-IN TANK SHELTERS/POSITIONS. 3985 SITSUM 12 JUL 62 REPORTS 5 NM SSE OF SANTA CLARA. NO CHANGE IN FACILITIES SINCE JUN 62. VENICLES/EQUIPMENT -- 16 TANKSe 3 PROBABLE SELF-PROPELLED GUNS. S20051 DocId: 32627026. Page 202 --- ## Page 203 SANTA CRUZ DE LOS PINOS, MILITARY ENCAMPMENT CU 3191 SITSUM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS 2 NM NNH OF SANTA CRUZ DE LOS PINOS AT 22-42-35N 083-08-151. MILITARY ENCAMPMENT LOCATEO IN A WOODEO AREA CONTAINS AT LEAST 7 BUILDINGS, 14 LARGE TENTS, 15 SMALLER TENTS, AND 75 VEMICLES, INGLUDING A CONVOY IN THE AREA• EQUIPMENT. AREA APPEARS TO BE UNDER DEVELOPMENT• 2242N 08308W 1-21 DocId: 32627026 Page 203 --- ## Page 204 033.1 SANTA CRUZ DEL NORTE CRUISE-MISSILE SITE 6-32388 29 AUG 62 REPORTS • • 9 NM WSS OF SANTA CRUZ DEL NORTE AT 23-49-02N 861-56-2810 SA-2 SAM SITE IN AN EARLY STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION• GUIDANCE POSITION WITH CABLE TRENCHING EXTENDING TO INTENDED LAUNCH POSITIONS• UNE UNOCCUPIEO LAUNCH POSITION. PARKING AREA CONTAINS 12 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERSE SET RADARE A MISSILE LAUNCHERS, AT LEAST 12 VANS AND NUMEROUS TRUCKS. CU 2309N PREVIOUSLY REPORTED AS AN SA-Z (SAM SITER NOW HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS AN INSTALLATION SIMILAR TO ONE AI BANES IN ORIENTE PROVINCES WHICH IS BELIEVED TO BE A CRUISE-TYPE COASTAL DEFENSE MISSILE SITE. DocId: 32627026 Page 204 --- ## Page 205 # 1 SANTA LUCIA ALTERNATE SAM SITE CU 2243N 08349W 304888 29 AUG 62 REPORTS LOCATED 8.4 NM NE OF SANTA LUCIA AT 22-43-48N1 083-49-50W• EQUIPMENT OBSERVED, 6 UNREVETTEO LAUNCH POSITIONS WITH LAUNCHERS, 6 CANVAS COVERED MISSILE TRAILERS. FRUITSET RADAR, APPROX 20 VEMICLES, AND & TENTS. STAR CONFIGURATION. 310L SITSUM 14 OCT 62 REPORTS INCOMPLETE INFORMATION. DocId: 32627026 Page 205 --- ## Page 206 SANTA FE AREA, MILITARY ACTIVITY CU 2143N 08249W 3078 MC1 2 MAY 62 REPORTS LARGE MILITARY TRAINING COVERING APPROXIMATELY 1A SO MI: 4 NM SW OF SANTA FE. AREA CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 7 BARRACKS, PROBABLE MESS HALL, A SUPPORT BUILDINGS. NUMEROUS SMALL BUILDINGS SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE AREA, 3 REVETTEO AMMUNITION STORAGE BUILDINGS, 2 FIRING RANGES. NUMEROUS ENTRENCHMENTS, GUN POSITIONS, VEMICLE REVETMENTS, DUG-IN TANK POSITIONS AND TRACK ACTIVITY SCATTERED THROUGHOUT AREA.: VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY 12 TRUCKS, PROBABLE PERSONNEL CARRLERSe AND 5 MISCELLANCOUS VEHICLES. DooId: 32627026 Page 206 --- ## Page 207 SANTIAGO DE CUBAS MILITARY CAMP 3ALO 11 DEC GO REPORTS CENTER OF CITY. L LARGE QUILDING WITH 6 W1MG58. 4 OTHER LARGE BUILDINGS. 22 PROBABLE PARKACKS. 17 BUSES, APPROXIMATELY 35 TRUCKS.. AND LE AUTOMOBILES IN CAMP AREdO NO OEFENSES COSERVED• 3H6U SITSUM 20 OCT O1 REPORTS CENTER OF CITY. ONE LARGE BUILDING WITH 6 WINGS, " OTHER LARGE QUILDINGS, 24 PROSAULE BARRACKS. 15 BUSESA 8 TRUCKS.... AND AUTOMOBILES IN CAHP AREA• NO DEFENSES OBSERVED® CU 28014 475490 DOCId: 32627026 Page 207 --- ## Page 208 SANTIAGO DE CURA AREA, MILITARY CAMP CU 2003N 075546 3478 MCI APPROXIHATELY B IN UNW OF SANTIAGO DE CUBA ON ROUTE 6-52. MILITARY CAMP AT 20-43-15N SHE CAR 4 20 05 5 975-53-30H INCLUDES T BARRACKS. ONE ADMIRISTRATIVE BUILDING, O SUPPORT BUTLOINGS, & FA POSITIONS, AND NUMEROUS AW LAPLACEMENTS. Doatd: 32627026 Page 208 --- ## Page 209 SANTIAGO DE CUUA, MILITARY TRAINING AREA CU 2842N 87550W 307B ICE 2 MAY O2 REPORTS MILITARY TRAINING AREA AT THE SANTIAGO DE CUBA AIRFIELD. FACILITIES INCLUDE 4 LARGE BUILDINGS, 6 SMALL BUILDINGSa NUMEROUS WEAPON EMPLACEMEN. H-SHAPED BUTLDING WITHIN A FENCED AREA. NO AÁA POSITIONS OBSERVED IN VICINITY. VEHICLES -= QUE GARD ONE TRUCKS MOBILE CRANE. DodId: 32627026 Page 209 --- ## Page 210 SANTIAGO DE CUBA, PROBABLE ANA SITE 3045 23 APR GI REPORTS 105 NM WEST OF SOUTH END OF AIRFIELD, AT SANTIAGO DE CURA. OCCUPIEO LIGHT AA POSITIONS SCATTERED IN AN OPEN FIELD. VEHICLES.- 3 TRUCKSO ONE POSSIOLE CONTROL CU 2002N 07549W Docrd: 32627026 • Page 210 --- ## Page 211 SANILAGO DE LAS VEGAS SAM ASSEMBLY AREA CU 2257N 68221W 6-30880 29 AUG 62 REPORTS• 2 MiT ESE SANTIAGO DE LAS VEGAS AT 22-57-408 002-21-30V. POSSIBLY AN INTERIM SAM ASSENBLY AREA COMTAINING 34 MISSILE TRANSPORTERS 1Ó OF WHICH ARE CANVAS-COVEREDI, S MISSILE DULLIESI 12 PROCABLE GUIDELINE MISSILES, _PIECES OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND APPROXIMAIELY 35 MISCELLANEOUS VEHICLES. EXTENSIVE OPEN STORAGE. MANOLINGA STORAGE, AND CHECKOUT FACILITIES NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH SOVIET-TYPE SUPPORT FAGILITIES WERE NOT OBSERVED. (0) DocId: 32627026 Page 211 --- ## Page 212 SENADO SAM SITE 3109 7 OCT 62 REPORTS 4ol NM NNE OF SERADO ARD LINE WNE OF NUEVITAS AT 21-36-36N 477-33-31H. SA-2 SAM SITE, UNREVETTED AND PROBABLY UNDER CONSTRUCTIONe CONTAINING THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 6 PROBABLE CANVAS-COVERED MISSILE LAUNCHERS EMPLACEDO POSSIBLE FRUTI SET RADAR AND APPROXIMATELY O ASSOGIATED VANS IN GUIDANCE AREA. MISSILE-HOLD POSITIONS EACH WITH Z MASSILE TRANSPORTERS? APPROXIMATELY 15 ADDITIONAL VEMICLES AND APPROXIMATELY & TENTSO SITE HAS A LINK CONFIGURAI101. Cu 2136N 07733W Do Ta: 32627026 Page 212 --- ## Page 213 STERRA DEL ANAFE MILITARY CAMP CU 2257N 03238W 3078 101 2 MAY 62 REPORTS ON STERRA DEL ANAFE AT 22-57-20N 882-38-00W. FACILLTLES INCLUDE 13 MISCELLANEOUS EUILOINGSO SMEOSO S VEHIGLE REVETMENTSA SHALL ARMS KÁNGER A POSSIOLE INFILTRATION RANGE AT SOUTH EDGE OF CAMP, ONE 3-GUN AW POSITION 105 N4 NW OF CANPA ONE 3-GUN AAN POSITION IUMEDIATELY FASI OF CAMP2 A PARRACKS/SUPPORT AÑEA CONTALNING 24 BUILDINGS ONE NN NORTH OF CAMP. OME G-GUN OCCUPIEO FA POSITION 1.2 NM NV OF CAIMITO. ONE G-GUN OCCUPIEO FA POSITION 1.4 NO:TH OF CAIMITO. 6-GUN AAA POSITION 203 NM NW OF CAMP. THE NE OE OTHER POSITION LOCATED TO CACIP• 0-GUR DocId: 32627026 Page 213 --- ## Page 214 SIGUANCA GOAT BASIN CU = 3101 SITSUM 14. 061 62 REPORTS 104 No She 0F SIGUANEA• VESSELS ONE PATROL FRIGATE AND ONE PROBABLE PATROL CRAFTO IACOMPLETE INFORMATION• 2137N 98258W DocId: 32627026 Page 214 --- ## Page 215 SIGUANGA CRUISE-HISSILE SITE A CRUISE MISSILE SITE MIC HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE ISLE OF PINES 1 NM SSW OF SIGUANEA AIRFIELD AT 21-37-25N 002-50-15W IT IS SITUATED •I NH INLANDA HILLTOP, ON THE EAST COAST OF THE RAY OF SIGUANEA. THE SITE IS SIMILAR TO THOSE OBSERVED AT BANES SANTA CRUZ DEL NORTE IN BOTH SITE CONFIGURATION ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. THE SITE CONSISTS OF TWO INCLINED LAUNCHERS APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET APART. ORIENTED 200 DEGREES AND 240 DEGREES RESPECTIVELY. RUTH LAUNCHERS ARE CONNECTED BY CABLE TO A PROBABLE WHIFF RADAR AND ANOTHER UNIOENTIFIED TYPE RADARO BOTH RADARS APPEAR TO BE NETTED. TO THE REAR OF THE LAUNCHERS ANO AT THE FOOT OF THE MILL ARE SEVEN MISSILE TRANSPORTERS, FIVE ARCH-ROOFED VANS ONE CRADE AND SEMORAL PROBACLE TRUCKS • CU 2137N 28258W DocId: 32627026 Page 215 --- ## Page 216 SIGUANEA SAL SITE CU 213791 3295 SITSUM 29 SEP 62 REPORTS •E NM SOUTH OF SWEND OF SIGUANEA AIRFIELO RONNAY? AT 21-37-33N 882-57-33k• SIX LAUNCHERS. 2 OF WHICH ARE IN OSTYE-THROUGH REVETKENES AND 4 UNREVETTER• FRUIT SET RADAR AND 4SS061A20 VANS INSTALLEDO CABLES EXTENO FROli QUIDANCE RAGAR TO ALL LAUNCHERS. AT LEAST T MISSILE TRANSPORTERS WITH CANVAS-COVERED TRAILERS PAKKED APPROXIMATELY ..S NN SOUTH OF CIRCULAR ROAD AND SACURITY FENCE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. 88257k DocId: 32627026 Page 216 --- ## Page 217 TRINIDAD AREA, POSS MIL HEAOQUARTERS CU 2150N 07953W 3078 MC1 2 MAY S& REPORTS NO CHANGE SINCE LASSION 3071% 1SMAK 62. EXCEPT 3 POSSIELE GUN EMPLACCMENTS CONSTRUCTION JUST LAST OF & PREVIOUSLY REPORTEO EMPLACEMENTS• POSSIOLE MILITARY: HCADQUARTERS AREA, •O NM NORTH OF SUN EMPLACEMENTS, CONSISTING OF MAIN BUILDING AND 8 MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS LOCATED AT 021-5QN. CHICLES/EQUIPMENT -- APPROXIMATELY & TRUCKS. DooId: 32627026 Page 217 --- ## Page 218 VICTORIA: DE LAS TUNAS AREA, MILITARY DEFENSES 3045 23 APR 61 REPORTS ZOl NM ENE OF VICTORIA DE LAS TUMASO NUMEROUS TRENCHESE AFPPOXIMATELY 2O OP SUN POSITIONS AND & MEDIUM/HEAVY GUN P0s17l0Nee ALL PROBABLY UNOCCUPIED. CU 2059N 076541 DocTa: 32627026 Page 218 --- ## Page 219 TERBA GUINEAR SUSPECT MISSILE AREA CU ZE06N 07532W MATERIAL UNLOADED AT SANGS REPORTED TAKEN TO YERBA GUINEA. 3055 SITSUM 2 FEB 02 REPORTS NO MISGILE ACTIVITY OESERVED. MILITARY TRAINING AREA WITH I2 SUPPORE QUILDINGS FRA EMPLACEMENTS, TRACK ACTIVITY. VEHICLE REVEMENTS AND 5 PRO@ADLE PRIME MOVERS. 3093 SITSUM 24 SEP 62 REPORTS NO MISSILE-RELATED ACTIVITY NOTED. NO CONVOYSE MILITARY CONCENTRATIONS? NEM CONSTRUCTION, OR SECUREE AREAS GOGERVED O DocId: 32627026 Page 219 --- ## Page 220 SECRET ANNEX L REVIEW OF NIE'S AND SNIE'S This annex reviews the formal National Intelligence Estimates and Special National Intelligence Estimates published prior to 14 October 1962 on the Cuban problem. DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13526, SEC. 3.5 NLK-10-120 BYMAD NARA, Date 3/3 SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 220 --- ## Page 221 SECRET Review of NIE's and SNIE's on Cuba Through 14 October 1962 1. SNIE 80-62, "The Threat to US Security Interests in the Caribbean Area, " Dated 17 January 1962. This estimate was done before there was any evidence of a build-up of sophisticated weapons in Cuba, but the possibility was explored that the Soviets might consider establishing "missile, submarine, or air bases designed to bring North America under attack or to add to the deterrents to any conceivable U.S. military action in the Caribbean or elsewhere." The estimators concluded, on the basis of their understanding of past Soviet policy and of the risks the Soviets would perceive, that a Soviet move to establish such bases was unlikely for some time to come. They pointed out that the Soviets in the past had been careful to retain control over situations which involved them in any serious degree of risk. Finally, they pointed out that such a move would be inconsistent with their purposes in Latin America. Nevertheless, they noted that the USSR could and pro- bably would augment its naval, air, and communications capabilities in the area by arrangements not openly identifiable as Soviet bases. 2. NIE 85-62, "'The Situation and Prospects in Cuba," dated 21 March 1962. This estimate was designed to present a detailed picture of develop- ments within Cuba and of Soviet activities there. The authors noted the steady communization of Cuba and the complexity of Soviet and Cuban SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 221 --- ## Page 222 SECRET Communist relations with Castro. They found no evidence of a Soviet intention to develop Cuba into a strategic base nor of any change in the Soviet policy of spreading communism in Latin America by encouraging and supporting Communist and non-Communist revolutionaries. They took account of the military equipment already in Cuba. An examination of this armament, however, led them to point out "that Bloc military deliveries to Cuba to date have been such as to enhance Cuba's capabilities for defense against external attack and for the maintenance of internal security rather than to contribute to the development of an independent offensive military capability.". They added, "The Bloc has provided no strategic weapon systems." The estimators then made the judgment that the. Bloc would be unlikely to provide Cuba with air, missile, or naval capabilities suitable for independent operations overseas, or to station Bloc combat units in Cuba. They did not believe, however, that this would preclude liberal provision of Bloc military advisers and technicians, or the provision of such defensive weapons and equipment as surface-to-air missiles and radars, or a token number of IL-28 jet light bombers. Thus the intelligence community took into account the possibility of the build-up of SAM's and IL-28's and. of Soviet military personnel which did in fact take place in August and September. What the estimators thought unlikely, along with an independent Cuban offensive capability, was the ..?::.. SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 222 --- ## Page 223 SECRET deployment to Cuba of Soviet combat units and of strategic weapons under Soviet control.. They thought this because they believed that the Soviets were aware of the geographic advantages which the U. S. would enjoy in any military confrontation in the neighborhood of Cuba and that they would estimate that there would be a high risk of U. S. intervention to prevent the establishment of an offensive base there. They estimated that the Soviets would not wish to bring on a confrontation with the U. S. under unfavorable circumstances and with attendant risks of general war. They were also impressed by the political and psychological importance of the Soviet position in Cuba and by the prospect that it could be used to effect the spread of communism in Latin America. They could see no reason for the USSR to risk that position by inviting U. S. intervention. 3. NIE 85-2-62, "The Situation and Prospects in Cuba, " dated 1 August 1962. The analysis of Soviet relations with Castro noted the concessions, both political and economic, which the Soviets had made to Castro in order to maintain their position in Cuba. The estimators saw no indication, however; of a change in the over-all Soviet posture toward the U. S. and Latin America.. After a careful examination of previous Bloc military shipments.to Cuba, they concluded that the effect of the shipments was still "to enhance Cuba's capabilities: for defense against external attack"' and maintain Cuba's internal security, but that they did not provide an offensive capability. They - 3 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 223 --- ## Page 224 SECRET went on to estimate that the Bloc would limit its military assistance to Cuba in this way, although they said again that such a policy would not preclude provision of more advanced jet fighters, surface-to-air missiles, IL-28 bombers, and the liberal provision of Bloc technicians. Once again the estimators took into account the possibility of the build-up that was to take place in August and September, and once again they deemed it unlikely that the USSR would develop a strategic base. Their reasons were as before. The evidence on Soviet policy toward the U. S. and Latin America in general remained as it had been. They believed the Soviets were fully aware of the risks inherent in the deployment of strategic weapons. Furthermore the military build-up in Cuba continued to be marked by the absence of air and sea lift which would have given Castro a capability for attacking his neighbors and by the absence of strategic weapon systems. NIE 85-2-62 was completed and passed by USIB before intelligence had become available on the military build-up that began in the last days of July. During the month of August, evidence on the progress of the build-up accumulated. By the end of the month it had become possible to piece. to- gether from a mass of ground reports a picture which included the deploy- ment of SAM's and the arrival of large numbers of Bloc personnel under military discipline. It was not until 29 August and 5 September, however, that aerial surveillance provided a clear picture of this: build-up. SNIE: 85-3-62 was then written. - 4 - ' SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 224 --- ## Page 225 SECRET 4. SNIE 85-3-62, "The Military Build-up in Cuba, " dated 19 September 1962. The key question to be answered was whether the new build-up reflected basic changes in Soviet policy. The estimators concluded that it did not, although it marked a dramatic change of pace. They believed that the military establishments in Cuba remained essentially defensive in character and that the Soviets had continued to avoid making an open pledge to protect Cuba under all circumstances. They saw no evidence to contra- dict the long established pattern of Soviet concern for the political and psychological advantages that they gained from their position in Cuba. The estimators placed their greatest. emphasis.on the.continued belief that the Soviets recognized that the development of an offensive military base in Cuba might provoke U. S. military intervention and thus defeat their purpose. At the same time the estimators observed that the Soviets were probably still uncertain about their future military program in Cuba and that they probably intended to test the U. S. and Latin American reaction as they proceeded with it. They went on to point out that their analysis of Soviet policy in Cuba was based on an over-all evaluation of Soviet interests and intentions, as well as on Soviet actions in and with respect to Cuba. While they had concluded on this basis that Soviet policy remained fundamentally unaltered, they did not wish to exclude the possibility that Moscow was at least considering a change in this policy. Therefore, in SNIE 85-3-62, they examined not only the Soviet military build-up in Cuba and developments in that build-up which might follow, but also "the nature and implications of = 5 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 225 --- ## Page 226 SECRET military assistance which the Soviets. could provide Cuba in the event of a major change of policy. " In analyzing the implications of the "current build-up" they pointed out that some of the new weapons could be used for offensive as well as defensive purposes, but that the pattern of aid to that date appeared "clearly designed to strengthen the defenses of the island, thereby pro- tecting the Communist beachhead in the Western Hemisphere and raising the price the lJ. S. would have to pay to eliminate it by military action." They noted that the military establishment in Cuba still lacked a significant strike capability. They then examined the possibilities for expansions of the build-up. They noted that the distinction between offensive and defensive weapons had become a major issue and that the Soviets were aware that a case could be made for supplying. "defensive" weapons and that the supply of other types would pose a challenge to which the U. S. might forcefully respond. They discussed the various weapons which the Soviets might try to inject into Cuba while still claiming that their purpose was defensive--IL-28 and TU-16 bombers, SS-1 and SS-2 missiles, submarines and destroyers. In this connection, the estimators suggested "a modest number of IL-28's" as a next move in testing U. S. reactions. "Thus," they concluded, "the Soviets may experiment with a number of further steps in the military build-up." The Soviet decision to do so, however, would be strongly ....... influenced by their estimate as to whether they could be introduced without - 6 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 226 --- ## Page 227 SECRET forceful U. S. intervention. The estimators next considered the use of Cuba as a Soviet strategic missile base. They pointed out that Soviet planners might see some utility in deploying MRBM's and IRBM's to Cuba and in estab- lishing a submarine base there. Their net judgment, however, was that the Soviets would not make such deployments, in part because such actions would run counter to their policies for the communization of Latin America, "but primarily because "they would almost certainly estimate that this could not be done without provoking a dangerous U. S. reaction." -7..= SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 227 --- ## Page 228 IOP SEGRET IDEALIST ANNEX M INTELLIGENCE JUSTIFICATION FOR U-2 OVERFLIGHTS OF CUBA Information concerning the U-2 mission of 14 October, consisting of: The Intelligence Justification A map showing the planned route and the route actually flown DECLASSIFIED E.O. 13526, SEC. 3.5 NLK-10-120 BYMAD NARA, Date 12/13 TOP SECRET IDEALIST DocId: 32627026 Page 228 --- ## Page 229 COPY TOP SECRET IDEALIST USIB-D-41. 5/25 (COMOR-D-24/20) 5 October 1962 Limited Distribution UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR THE UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD SUBJECT: Intelligence Justification for U-2 Overflight of Cuba The attached COMOR-developed statement of intelligence justification for U-2 overflight of Cuba will be placed on the agenda of the 10 October USIB meeting for consideration and approval of the Board. COMOR-M-105, referenced therein, is available to Board members through their representatives on the COMOR. (Signed) JAMES S. LAY, JR. Executive Secretary TCS-13708-62 TOP SECRET IDEALIST COPY DOCId: 32627026 Page 229 --- ## Page 230 COPY TOP SECRET IDEALIST Attachment USIB-D-41. 5/25 (COMOR-D-24/20) 5 October 1962 MEMORANDUM FOR: United States Intelligence Board SUBJECT: REFERENCE: Intelligence Justification for U-2 Overflight of Cuba COMOR-M-105 (TCS-13368-62) The attached intelligence justification for U-2 overflight of Cuba is forwarded for consideration and approval of the United States Intelligence Board. This proposal should be considered in conjunction with COMOR-M-105, which summarizes the capabilities of peripheral reconnaissance. (Signed) Lowell E. May Acting Chairman Committee on Overhead Reconnaissance Attachment: Subject Paper -2.- TOP SECRET IDEALIST TCS-13708-62 COPY DocId: 32627026 Page 230 --- ## Page 231 COPY TOP SECRET IDEALIST Attachment USIB-D-41. 5/25 (COMOR-D-24/20) INTELLIGENCE JUSTIFICATION FOR U-2 OVERFLIGHTS OF CUBA 1. There is now a pressing and continuing need for up-to-date intelligence on the progress of the Soviet arms build-up in Cuba. The very highest levels of the government are dependent upon this intelli- gence to assist in making policy decisions of immediate and vital concern to the nation. At the present time, this intelligence can best be provided, with sufficient timeliness and broadness of scope, by overflying Cuba with the U-2. 2. The items of most immediate concern are the missile installations springing up all over the island. SA-2 sites are present in various stages of construction, including some sites where available photography shows only the missile hardware present with no actual construction yet under way (e.g:, Jiguani suspect SAM site). There are also SSM sites which have been observed on recent coverage of the eastern end of the island and on the Isle of Pines. Two sites on older coverage of Cuba have also been re-evaluated as SSM rather than SAM sites. The absence of coverage of the western end since August 29, coupled with the rate of construction we have observed, means that there may well be many more sites now being built of which we are unaware. Ground observers have in several recent instances, reported sightings of what they believe to be. the SS-4 (SHYSTER) MRBM in Cuba. These reports must be confirmed or denied by photo coverage. It is also necessary to know how many KOMAR class PGMG's may be in service. 3. In addition to the missile threat, on which it is so important to obtain late date knowledge, we have confirmed the presence of MIG-21 aircraft in Cuba. Estimates (based on sightings of merchant shipping with crates which may obtain more disassembled MIG-21's) " already have been made in figures as high as 36 although we have firm photo confirmation of only one. We have no way of substantiating these estimates at the present time other than through overhead reconnaissance. 4. Given this extensive build-up of arms, the possibility of U.S. operations in the area cannot be ignored.. To prepare for such events, the responsible commanders (in the case of overt military - 3 - TOP SECRET IDEALIST TCS-13708-62 DocId: 32627026 Page 231 --- ## Page 232 COPY TOP SECRET INDEALIST Attachment USIB-D-41. 5/25 (COMOR-D-24/20) operations) and organizations (in the case of clandestine or unconventional operations) require up-to-date intelligence on the areas in which they may be working. These requirements are secondary to the requirements outlined in paragraphs 2 and 3 above. But they are nonetheless important and potentially of even greater importance, 5. The requirements stated above have been translated into a list of objectives by the COMOR Working Group. This list is maintained up-to-date on the basis of all-source intelligence and a plot of them as of 1 October is appended as TAB A for information. The schedule of satellite missions approved for the remainder of the year will probably provide some intelligence, but it is not timely enough nor of sufficient resolution to meet our needs. The next mission will not be till mid- November, some ll weeks after the last good coverage of some areas. FIRE FLY may also prove highly useful in covering specific objectives of limited scope. But the small area coverage obtainable by FIRE FLY makes it less desirable than the U-2. Tactical reconnaissance using FR-101/F8U-1P aircraft may also prove feasible. But this is supple- mentary to a U-2 program, not a substitute therefor. Tactical reconnaissance can provide detailed photography for technical intelli- gence purposes, but not the repeated, wide area coverage necessary to cover the present objectives. 6. There is only one presently available way to meet the require- ments of the government: frequent and regular U-2 overflights of the island to the extent that primary objectives as shown in TAB A are covered once a month.. The COMOR recognizes the increased risk to the aircraft in light of the SA-2 and MIG-21 aircraft present there. But it must be stated that the current need is extremely urgent, and the risk involved should be very thoroughly weighed before this coverage is denied. 4÷ TOP SECRET IDEALIST TCS-13708-62 COPY DocId: 32627026 Page 232 --- ## Page 233 DocId: 32627026 Page 233 TAB A of Attachme: Miami RECONNAISSANCE OBJECTIVES IN CUBA SECRET NOFORN Havana. Isle of Pines CUBAR UNIDENTIFIED - MISSILES SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SITES JET FIGHTER FIELDS NAVAL OPERATING BASES NAVAL PORTS MILITARY INSTALLATIONS SPECIAL AREAS BEACHES UNIDENTIFIED INSTALLATIONS NAS Guanfanamo Bay TAB A SECRET NOFORN ### 68-13708-17 --- ## Page 234 WARNING AREA SAC By . WARNING AREA G U L ROUTE CIA PLANNED PROB. OPERATIONAL SAM SITE TARGET AREA Cayo Inés de Soto 1...: La Esperanzà- San Cayelano <= Santa Lucla Fiao "Niagara® ir o terracos •Consolación det Norte SIE Viñales Matalámbre •B'S PINAR DELIRIO Herradura Pilotos Consolación del Sur Puestade Golpe PINAR DEL RÍO 'unta de a Sierra San Juan y Martinez Êso _ R Bp Fr, JULIAN San Luis Media Luna? La Coloma Punta de Cartas 10. I CORTES SAY/IBO 10 ¡CAYOS DE SAN FELIPE ACTUAL Otozco +-illagel 00. Bahía Honda 253₴1 PR 8 Sabanilla TT San Cristoba San Die LOs Palacie Y Taco Taco la Caballeria , Pas Re: Ponte de Vayaniguas - 10: Punta de Carraguao GOLFO.. 1 D.4J • Cayo de Dios los hitlid Punta d Barcos: indios Cabo Frances'" Ensenade de lu PROHIBITED AREA SANTA FE LA de la HABANA / 66 Gp FI 00 Boca de Guanabo LA HABANA SEX CAMPO COLUMBIA /65 45 MARIEL NAS/ 90 00 SANTA FE/30 DOMINGO ROSILLO / 45. EL NAS / 60 40 Sustita Cabañas 6 Martes OHIBITED Ramoi RE 894 Bauta-C+ PUTION AREA GUANARACON- -JOSE M _Cotorro $0o", Jar "Tapaste OSE MA La C GUANAIX •Cayajabos ARTEMISA SAN ANTO NO DE LOS BAÑOS Alquiza 50 San Folipe- Orivioát Santiago de las Vegas / San José "Bejucal de las Lajas °950 9Sar Antonic de las Vegas Melena del Sul andelaria RESTRICTED -AREA-. Guanimar —R Bn - Cayos •BATISTA irlos Guzmanes •Camacho Surgidero ¿ Rosario de Batabanó Xv • Punta! Cayos Las Cayamas Jejenes ENSENA (bay) F "Si": LOTEM-O Punta Gorda (point) I Cayos del Hambre B A T B A N:"Ó .:Gayo (islaid de Mangies 30 40 50 _RiBn Nueva Gerona NUEVA GERONA ISLA Tistand) "PIÉLAG Santa Bárbara okONEL MARTIN BARRERRO/ 60E LOS DE Santa Fé-50 Los ladios 3017 r PINOS 3 920 C Cayos Bocas de Alonzo CANARREOS: Cayo Tablones f DocId: 32627026 Page 234 --- ## Page 235 SECRET ANNEX O Correspondence Between Chairman, President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and the Director of Central Intelligence Regarding the Cuban Arms Build-up (14 April - 14 October 1962) E This annex contains a copy of a letter from the Chairman, President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board to the Director of Central Intelligence requesting a review of the intelligence community's activities in regard to the Cuban arms build-up (14 April - 14 October 1962), and the DCI's reply thereto, both : dated 14 November 1962. SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 235 --- ## Page 236 COPY 14 November 1962 Memorandum for: Dr. James Killian Chairman, President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory. Board This is to let you know that your letter of November 14th asking for a report on the intelligence community's activities during the 12-month period preceding 14 October 1962, specifically in regard to Cuba, has been received and will be discussed at the meeting of the United States Intelligence Board tomorrow. Addi- tionally, I have sent copies of it to Secretary Rusk; Secretary McNamara, Mr. McGeorge Bundy, and the Attorney General for their information. I think you realize that it is a sizeable task to be fully responsive by the time of your next meeting on December 7th. Although the Central Intelligence Agency is well along toward its final report, the consolidation of this report with those from other members of the intelligence community will require some painstaking and closely-integrated effort. I will do my best to get my final report to you prior to your next meeting. John A. McCone Director cc: J. Patrick Coyne DocId: 32627026 Page 236 --- ## Page 237 THE WHITE HOUSE. WASHINGTON PRESIDENT'S FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY BOARD 163-8368 November 14, 1952 Dear John: on benali of the presidentis Board, trasi to express our appreciation for your submission at our November S meeting of the memorandum dated Hovenber 7, 1962, Which ned been pre- pared within the Central intelligence Agency on the subject "CIA Fandling of 16 October 1562." the Soviet Build-uo in Cuba, 1 Juy - The memorandum wich you supplica, ad your comments to the board, vere an inctructare contribution to our current review of the intelligence collection and reporting roles performed by the United states intelligence community with respect to the vitaily important subject matter invoived. In furtherance of the Board's review it would be helpiul in we were supplied with information on ail pertinent aspects of the total U.S. foreign intelligence effort which was brought to bean in providing advence information and assess- ments of the developing ballietic missile canability which was positively confirmed by means of photographic reconneis- sance over Cuba on October 14 , 1952. such infomation will materially assiso un bond in lus continuing sporaisai oi our foreion intelligence activities and should racilitate the consideration of messures fon the purther stranguening of our intelligence system. Accordingly, the Board would lile to bequest a revier on an cli-source, all-agenor basis of the actions talen and resulis obtsinea within the intelli- gence cormunity in providino incelligence coverage, reporting and estimates of the developing build-un during the morth perlod preceding Detocen 14, 1962. It would de appreciated in a report setting fortr the results of the intelligence communityis revier would include: (a) an identification of the roguinenente levied on intelli- ¿ence collection elemente of une Government, (o) a resume of the intelligence infoimation obtained from such sources as coreion diniomatic nerzonnel, cupen reruzee invernogations. in-place agent reports, colina, end ELINT auring the period DocId: 32627026 Page 237 --- ## Page 238 2. referred to above, (o) the scope of distribution given such and laterally within the the extent to which such information was reflected in reports and assessments ero- vided to policy level officials. He understand that the Department of Defense is reviewing Its own Intelligence activities pertaining. to the Cuban situation, and this will doubtless be helpful in this matter. If the results of the intelligence community's review could be made availabla to the board in time for consideration at its next meeting on December 7, without materially interferins with substantive matters of importance, the board would theresy be enabled to respond in timely fashion to requests which are before it. FOR THE BOARD." James R. Killian, Jr. Chairman Mr. John MeCone Director of Central Intelligence DocId: 32627026 Page 238 --- ## Page 239 SECRET ANNEX P Request for Contributions to Intelligence Community Review of Activities during the Cuban Arms Build-up (14 April - 14 October 1962) This annex contains a copy of a memorandum dated 16: November 1962 from the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence to the Department of State, Defense Intelligence Agency, and. National Security Agency forwarding a format to be followed in the preparation of their agency's contribution to the study of community activities during the Cuban arms build-up (14 April 14 October 1962). Copies of General Carter's memorandum were also furnished the USIB representatives from AEC and FBI as well as components of CIA participating in the review. SECRET DooId:32627026 Page 239 --- ## Page 240 SECRET 16 November 1962 MEMORANDUM FOR: The Director of Intelligence and Research, : Department of State Director, Defense Intelligence Agency Director, National Security Agency REFERENCE Memorandum for USIB Principals from the DCI, dated 14 November 1962 1.. Pursuant to the discussion at the Executive Session of the United States Intelligence Board meeting on 15 November 1962, I have established a working group in the Central Intelligence Agency under the chairmanship of the Inspector General of CIA to prepare the response to the request by the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board for an all-agency, all-source review of the intelli- gence. activities relating to the Cuban situation, 2. The Director of Intelligence and Research, Department of State; the Director, Defense Intelligence Agency; and the Director, National Security Agency have designated representatives to this group in order to provide necessary support, research, analysis, and other staffing required in the preparation of the response. the seve There is attache ot the guidance of the peration otines os agency's contribution to the study. This format has been coordinated with these representatives. 4: Copies of this letter and of the format have also been sent tọ Chairman, Atomic Energy: Commission, and to Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, together with requests for any data which they may be able to supply to aid the study. SECRET GROUP 1 Exetuded from automatic downgrading and declassification DooId: 32627026 Page 240 --- ## Page 241 SECRET 5. Individual agencies' contributions will be submitted to the chairman of the working group not later than close of business 23 November 1962. Mas hasS. Canted Marshall S. Carter Lieutenant General, USA Deputy Director of Central Intelligence Attachment CC: Director J-? (Intelligence) Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Army Director, Naval Intelligence Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Air Force - 2 - SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 241 --- ## Page 242 SECRET FORMAT FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY'S REVIEW OF INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES RELATING TO THE CUBAN ARMS BUILD-UP, 14 APRIL THROUGH 14 OCTOBER 1962 The main headings under which information is desired from each contributing agency are as follows: A. COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS B. COLLECTION FACILITIES C. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION-- THE SUBSTANCE D. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION--ITS DISSEMINATION E. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION--PROCESSING F. THE INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT G. USE OF THE INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT H. PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY COORDINATION Under these general headings each agency is asked to supply the following information: SECRET DocId: 32627026. Page 242 --- ## Page 243 SECRET A. COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS I. At the beginning of the period under review, what were the requirements on Cuba and on Soviet Bloc activities with respect to Cuba, as levied upon the agency? 2. At the beginning of the period, what were the agency's own internal requirements for intelligence on Cuba and on Soviet Bloc activities with respect to Cuba? How were these requirements generated? 3. How long had the requirements in 1. and 2., above, been in effect? Had there been any significant recent changes? If so; what? 4. What significant changes in requirements were introduced during the period? I internally produced, how were they generated? 5. How were the requirements in I., 2., and 4., above, trans- mitted to the agency's collection facilities? What, if any, requirements were referred to other collecting agencies? 6. What role did the agency play in the generation of community. requirements? SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 243 --- ## Page 244 SECRET B. COLLECTION FACILITIES 1. What are the nature and scope of the agency's collection facilities With respect to the Cuban situation? (For example: Cuban or third-countiy agents or informants in Cuba; legal travelers; Cuban of third-country. diplomats; refugees; liaison services; analysis of overt press and radio; COMINT, ELINT; photography -- specify means and available targets.) 2. Please describe any new facilities which were created -- or existing facilities which were expanded or redirected during the period or shortly before -- which contributed significantly to the agency's col- lection effort. 3. What targets was the agency able to cover and with what frequency and continuity? 4 Within the terms of the agency's mission, what targets was it unable to cover, and why? 5.! What, if any, significant changes, either positive or negative, in the agency's coverage capability, took place during the period? 6. What support for collection facilities was required from other agencies? How was it secured from them? Was it timely and effective? What, if anything, was lacking? SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 244 --- ## Page 245 SECRET C. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION - THE SUBSTANCE Please submit the following data on all intelligence information relating to the Cuban arms build-up which was collected by the agency during the period: 1, Abstracts of all raw reports bearing significantly on the build-up. 2.: For each such abstract please note: a. Serial number of report. b. Date of information. c. • Date of dissemination. d. Brief source description. e. Source grade. f. Content appraisal. g. To whom disseminated. 3. Please make special note of any such raw reports which the agency. considered to be of particular significance at the time of receipt. Also please note any which, though not specially noted at the time of receipt, the light of subsequent events has shown to be of importance. SECRET DooId: 32627026 Page 245 --- ## Page 246 SECRET D: INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION -- ITS DISSEMINATION I. Please provide, in detail, the standard dissemination which applies to most of the agency's reports. When, how, and for what reasons is this dissemination varied? 2. How are reports originating with your agency distributed in the community? 3. How are reports originating outside your agency dissemin- ated within the agency? 4. Please provide a narrative statement on the flow of intel-. ligence information significantly concerned with the arms build-up in: Cuba, both within your agency and from your agency to other community elements. 5. Please select a particularly significant report and trace its progress from the time the information was acquired by the ultimate source to the time it reached the hands of the customer. SECRE DooId: 32627026 Page 246 --- ## Page 247 SECRET E. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION -- PROCESSING 1. Please discuss the analytical process in the agency with respect to the Cuban arms build-up. Who does the analyzing? What research facilities of technical analytical tools are brought to bear? Does this involve support from other agencies? If so, to what extent? How effective? Any lacks? 2. Do analysts discuss intelligence information with analysts of other agencies? If so, do they do it regularly or only on occasion?. Does such discussion facilitate rapid and effective analysis? 3.. Please discuss the way the agency uses intelligence information; both its own product and that of other collecting agencies, in the preparation of internal intelligence and estimative publications. 4. To what extent do analysts and estimators discuss intel- ligence information with personnel engaged in directing collection operations? Do the analysts and estimators know as much about the capabilities of collection facilities as they need to in order to do their job effectively? 5. How is intelligence processed for submission to coordinated community publications? Who prepares such submissions; and what is the administrative mechanism employed? How does it work? SE R.. E T DocId: 32627026 Page 247 --- ## Page 248 SECRET F. THE INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT 1. Please submit the following: a. Consecutive dated verbatim extracts, dealing with the Cuban arms build-up, from all of the agency's formal intelli- gence publications during the period. b. Two copies of each formal agency estimative publication dealing with Cuba during the period. Do not include agency contributions to NIE's or SNIE's. 2. Please describe what other channels, such as oral or written, were used during the build-up to transmit pertinent information to policy-level officials. SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 248 --- ## Page 249 "SECRET G. USE OF THE INTELLIGENCE PRODUCT 1. What unilateral operational use did the agency make of intelligence or intelligence information received on the build-up? 2. How was such information or intelligence used by the agency in participation in community meetings (USIB, Special Group, Watch Committee, NRO, others)? 3.: How and to what extent did the agency contribute to coordinated action by the community or members thereof (including action by the agency alone, as directed or permitted by the community) as a result of intelligence received during the build-up? 4. Please provide specific instances in which the agency's intelligence product affected US policy or, together with the product of other agencies, contributed to it. DocId: 32627026 Page 249 --- ## Page 250 SECRET H. PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY COORDINATION 1.: Other than as stated under G., above, in what community publication panels or committees does the agency participate? 2. What elements of the agency are resconsible for such coordination? 3. How do they participate in this coordination? 4. Please give specific examples, including dates and contents, of any items of intelligence presented by the agency which have been withheld from publication, delayed, or signifi cantly altered by the coordination process. If delayed, how long? If altered, in what way? SECRET DocId: 32627026 Page 250 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10173-10104.pdf
104-10173-10104
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
01/01/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CIA FILE ON LOGUINOV, VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH.
283
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-9 : F27 : 1998.02.16.10:42:12:890107 : NOT BELIEVED RELEVANT (NBR).
283
## Page 1 104-10173-10104 •ASSIFICO MESSAGE Z24 SECRET D SiT. 10 8016640 O11. MEXICO CITY WH8 N RID COPY I VR, CI, CT/ORS, FI, SRS, CIRCL, CT/CA -?. SECRET 071903Z DIR SITE MEXI 3831 72546029099 REDCOAT LCIMPROVE LICANNY-I REF A HMMY 12821 AUD 64 filed 201-202:37 MEXT 5372 NOV 63(099634 7 1, DURING ROUTINE CONTACTS WITH POSWING OFFICER DURING JAN • SURJ ADVISED ME IN CONTACT, PAVEL YATSKOV (201-129123) AND VALENTIN LOGINOV <201-2854123, BOTH SUSPECT XGB. SOVS ASKED HIM FPÉPARE TrAVEL INFO ON TRAINS AND SHIPS, BETUEEN MEXICO, NEW CRA IND EUROPE, LOGINOV APPEARS FRIENDLY AND TOLD SUEJ NE MOPES THEY -*LE-BE FRIENDS.: & PASWING OFFICER TURNED SUBJECT OVER TO SIATION OFFICER TO WHOM AUREED ACT -AS ACCESS AGENT LOGINOV REQUEST HES REPROCESS POA. •SECRET * REF., LAURICLE CEN 5837-1 HMMW-12821 HMMW-12821 5372 65 PBSWING PAVEL YIASKOV YIASKOV 122123 VALENTIN LOGINOV 201-285412 KGB SOVS NEW YORK EURUPE LOGINOV PRSWING LOGINOV HOS POA ST SERRET 501.885412 --- ## Page 2 sa, es DISPATCH SECRET AX Celo S00 chief, HID Chief of Station, Mextoo City xx REDWOOD UndentIfied Visitor 20 the Sorter Embassy In Mexico Cisy. 193636 89144 Masola Fa ride-r 10+048I N933 LICALLA and LILYRIC reported an unidentified visitor.ro the Sovier Eabsssy La Maxico City between 29 November and 3 Decenber 1965. The visitor appears to be a Sorter; horever, LIFIRE has not reported any inaccounted for soviet to havo visited Mexico during this period, nor las the presence of a Sorter visitor reported to the station by any other source. Is has not been seen since 3 Decenber 1263. ?, According to LiCNad, the visitor was principally in contace with the cook, Anatoliy Aleksawrovich ALRiN (201-223948), miministrative sour chey Arena trove: PARO (203-% 1365), • Miril secretary and Anoin KGB officer Malfair Ivanorich SEAMVICH (201-343894), First Secretary and kron AGb officer Aleksandr Vladimirovich MINDDU (201-202379). and Press Arracia mid known AGb officer Maholmy Sergeyevich LEONA (201-1-32 139) According to LILYRIC, the visitor ias geen leaving the Saviet Enhassy writh Mililn, and later with Third Secretary and suspect KOB osticer Valentin Sergerevich LOCINOV (201-285412) on 30 Noventer 1905: On 1 Decenber he was seen lesving with MUNiN and his wife, Contarcial Conselor Georgly Stepanovich VIS&0 (201-243603) and chauffeur Anatoliy Paylovich PRAlICULIN (201-735052) In the car norally driven by Pravda correspondent Vialimir -Aga fonovich DOLOOV: (201=763035)5 - On 2 Docenber he was soon leaving with KIN Sid his wife, zaKaY, visitor Ferdinand Rove rovich CINTO mad (continued) Distribut ion: •AID w/o/att 2 • File- CDOSS PERSIACA TO 1094A-28001 CLASSE CATION SECRET Prey fled 50-8-10 3 January 1900 1501285412 201-4-04 --- ## Page 3 • CONTINUATION OR DISFATCH SECRET 1N04-23201 Arrache and suspect kiB officer Visdisla SorgeYaNC DORMSKIN (201-744341) On 3. Decenter la mas seen learing wich MAHN sil do Abrached is a photographi of tha visitor taten by LiLYRIC. in state veric portda for possible dentification es the attached photograph could t for/wllard C. OJiTIS --- ## Page 4 DiSPATCH Chief of Ststion, Mexice Caty CLASSMICA: ION SIGNE I PROCESSINR ACT:OR... XXXXX 110 1902U8G FUED CAIT QUALIFIS DISA D4FO Fries Chief. SR via Chiefa hil SUBJECT REDWOOD ¿talentin Sergeyevich LOGINOY (201-295112) ACTION REQUIRLO REFERINCES REFERENCE: HiMW- 13985, 16 Septomber 1965 Fotwarded herewith is paragraph 9 (PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION AND PHOTOS) of summary traces in SPR format on Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412) as promised to you in the above reference. BAG: BRUCE H. GINTALAS ATTACHMENT: Paragraph 9 as stated above TELETT DISTRIBUTION: Orig. & 2-Chief' of Station, Mexico City (W/att): 1c00) CROSS REFERENCI DISPATON STARDON AMD MUMBER ENMN 14087 CLASSIFICATION SECRET 907-285412 CS. C32% DATE LANOv 1965 GROUP .1 28. October 1965 factuced Mam zing". PAT PACE: L'S MOS FILE NUMBER deciassificatias 201-285412 ON FICE OFFICER ORIGINATING TYPIST Exr. ST./0/PA vib 6213 COORDINATING OFFICE STRUCK DATE OTICER'S MANE SR/O/WH 25 Eeт65 1-RID (w/att) I-SR/O/WH (wo/att) RH/1 (wo/att) RELEASING DECER SS GRATURE Pret Sosas 7/KI1/1 ¡ DATE 143) MICHATEU +ce 53 --- ## Page 5 1d-0000 SECRET PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION AND PHOTOS: Do: Height: 68 tall. Co Biild: strong build; ca. 185 Ibs. in Havane. do Hairs, blond wavy hair. 8o Shape of Face: concave forehead. 1- 1:721 9:9 27 WTFE: 201-203412 RFF: 4: SO1C107 PFT -20553 S010107: S010I0T #:: 0) 660-14057 SECRET 547-255412 --- ## Page 6 DISPATCH SECRET 10 INTO Chief, su Division -- are, =. XXX: MATO AT IT NO REATURE RICE Ra. en?" CAS SOLE INTONINa. chies, sa Division SUBMICT chlof of Station, Mexico CAtY REDCOAT/LCIMPROVE John: - a STRATOS ACTION REQUIRLD FUURENCES LICOZY/S reported that on 12 Octobor 196S Subject visited his place of business and said thit he had been referred to LICOZY/S by the Soviot inbassy. llo said ho was intorested in a one-may tickot the Soviet Union. Subjock furnished the following information tO LICOZY/S : Ho was born on 19 August 1942 in Michigau.. He-is : a student at U.C.h.A. and wante to visit the USSR as a tourist. Subject held U. 5. passport number C 630391 1ssuod 29 August 1962. His tourist card shoved that he enteroil Noxico by bus at Sonoita, Sonora on 9. Uctober 1965. Subject pald for 15 days in the Soviet Union but sald that he planned so stay longer. Ho left Mexico via Air France flighe 703 on 16-Ocrober; (confired by flight manifosts). His plans call for hin to depare Paris for Moscos via Air Prance Flighe 724 on 17 Ocsober. During a routine visit to the Consular Section of the soviet Embassy, Valontin S. LOGINOV thanked LiCOZY/S for "taking care" of subject but. in the prosence of both PRIKHODO any Consular officor Vladimir S. KORMUSHKIN, LOGINOV admonished: LIC02Y/5 {0r 09KI0g for more biographic-data than he necded to fill our the necessary LIC0ZY/5 dented that he had asked for more information than (Subject apparontly reported kICOrY/S's obtatuing the above biographic data for was debriefed by LOGINOy, goeng unusual for in American student to travol fron the U.S. to Moxico in order to travel to the Sovior Undon since ho le mutomatically increasing. the cost of his travol by a considorable Since Subject Crossed Into Mexico on 9 October, veck before his departure for the USSR, it would appoar that ho came to Mexico exclusivoly for this purpose. the P. So a Chortle ling via Moxico was to conceal this trip froa Killard C. CURTIS Distribution! CIBHAICH SYMODE, ANI NUMAGI HAMLA • 27467 CLASSI SECRET CABE 20 OCTOBER 1905 +C585-51203201285412 FFN: P -2712 --- ## Page 7 DISPATCH QLASSITKATON PROCESSING ACTION SECRET BARNED FOR IHOEXIS XXX NO IROCTING REQUIRED Chief,: SR ENFOR Chief, hit SUBJECT Q RETHOOD - Valent in Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-265412) oner or station, monto a e ONLY QUALIFIED DISA CAM NAGE INDEXINO actoram CTION REQUILD - REFEREN LIPIRE reported the arrival on 10 October 1965, vía Sabena Might 555, of Subject's wife, Aleksandra Dmitriyevna, ard his son Dnitriy. Travelling on the same flight were Boris Aleksandrovich KAZANTSEV (201-028975) and nia pad pi8387 27425 wife returning to Mexico from home cave: i fian - forMillard C. CURTIS DISTRIBUTION: 2 a C/SR -C/WH CROSS REFERENCE TO CS CORI DISPATCH STRADIO AND MEMBER HMMA 27420 CLASTREICATION SECRET 201-2854112 DATE 14 October 1965 HQSIAISLADER 201-285412 --- ## Page 8 14-00000 DISPATCH GAIJARAIIN SECRET Chief of station, Muxico ClEy EAVO MAN: SO STAR NO INCE EIDERIO CHET QUANTID E151 CAT NONE ISOCKING Chief, Se via Chiof, Mi REDADOD (Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201 283412) ACTIOP RIQUARTO RUFUREHOLS REFERENCE: - MAXI 4363, 7 August 1969 1. Forwarded herowlth are sumiary traces in SPR format on Valentin Sorgeyevich LOcINoV, reflocting a digest of avallable Information In Headquartors £1los. 2, Paragraph 8 of the above atcachuent (PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION AND PHOTOS) will be forvarded to you ae a lator date under soparate dispatch as soon as the photos hnve buen procossed here at lleadyuarters. 3o" Forwarded under separate cover, la Paragraph 21 (IDENTITIES). BRUCE H. GINTALAS ATTACHHENTS: Bo. Summary traceo in SPR format (h/w) Paragraph 21 (IDENTITIES) (u/s/c) DISTRIBUTION! Origo & 2-Chief of Station, Mexico City (watt A, H/w; Watt 8, u/s/C) 201-285912 CROSS REFERENCE TO DISPATCH STABOL AND NUMBER HMM 13935 CLASSIFIC. GROW 1 domegrarin: ana declasalticaller SECRET DIATE 23SEP 1905 16 September 1965 HOS FILE MUMBER 201 285412 Of FIE ORIGIATING 160931 SR/O/PA vjb COORDINATING Fat? OFFERS NAME 1- RDEW/ALt A & B 1- SR/OCKH (wats A & B) 1- WHEE SR/O/WH WI/1 20 Setos 4/31 77 Rilessins +01-19448 68 ad / 1 6213 '??! --- ## Page 9 14-00000 ATTACHNENT EZE TO # 13985 SECRET SUNMARY TRACES IN SPR FORMAT PREPARFD BY. DATE 201 NUMBER A NUMBER BRUCE M. CINTARAS • 8 September 1965 201 285412 18721 1. NAME: Valentin Sergeyevsch LOGINOV - 20 DPOB: 23 December 1927, Moscow 3O CITIZENSHIP AND PASSPORT DAA: a. USSR citizen. bo Passport D016993, Issuud 24 August 1960. c. Passport D010264, Issued 1965 6. CURRENT POSITION: Third Secretary, Soviet Embassy, Mexico City. 7. RELATIVES: Spouse: do Children: Aleksandra Dmitriyevna, born 20 August 1928, Moscow.. Worked in the Consular Offico in Havana. Speaks poor Spanish. Son - Dmitrty Valentinovich, born 1959., Daughter - Irina Valentinovna, born ca. 1952. LANGUAGES: Subject speaks fluent Spanish with a slight accent. ..,. Subject spoke some Engitsh while he, was in Havana.' RIS INPUT NO. I THOA $9 207-285412 * read the st in the --- ## Page 10 SBCRET 11. CURRICULUM VITAE: A February 1960 Diplomatic List from Argentina lists Subject as a new Soviet Military Attache due to arrive in Buenos Alres in the near. future. There is no. indication that Subject ever filled that post. From September 1960 to September 1963, Subject and family vere In Havana where subject served as an Attache at the Soviet Embassy. December 1961, he accompanted the Soviet DYNAMO soccer team on a Latin American tour as their escort and Interpreter. Subject arrived in Mexico City on 3 August 1965 to roplace knowm KCB officer Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO (201 305870), as. a Third Secretary® 12. INTELLIGENCE AFFILIATION: subject is listed as probable RIS, probably KGB.on the basis of his activitiés while statiored in Havana and by virtue of his replacing & known KGB officer in Mexico City. Per HArMA 28310, 3m0166 Sulyset 13 g INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITY: While subject accompanted the DYNAMo soccer team through La Pas 1n December 1961, he became acquainted with KISHIN-1 (Identity i), a KUBÄRK Bolivian security service penetration and later'a low level Bolivian university-cell CP penetration. It is not recorded upon whose Initiative the contacte were made. However, by KISHIN-l's admission he had several informal and friendly reetings with Subject during which Subject encouraged KISHIN-I to accept a Cuban student grant. Infact he specifically expressed an eagemess to be of any assistance in helping KISHIN-1 to get to. Cuba. KISHIN-l never went to Cuba, although he did SEC RET --- ## Page 11 1d-0000 SECRET 13a (CONTINUED) correspond with Subject on the mattar un at least one occasion. KISHIN-I was terminated as an agènt In July 1969 for security reasons and because It was belleved that he was a fabricature: No further dèvelopments in -his associatiön with Subject were noted. On the same trip through Latin Anurica in December 1961, Subject was observed to have In his possussion some $2,000 in' United States currency. Aftor sending the soccer tram back to Moscow from Quito, *Subject continued alone through Panama Cily, where he was seen in contact with a Mexican eltizen with whom he flow on to Mexico City. In Mexico City Subject reported to known KGB officer Aleksey Ivanovich CARMASHOV (201 227418) at the Soviet Embassy. Frouà sensitive source it was.; Learned that CARMASHOV lad been linstructed to look into the mattor of Subject's four-day délay in returning to lavana from Quito and that Subject's superlors in Havana wore concarned. It is not known what relationship, 1l any, these circunstoneci have to each other. „In Havana carly in 1963, Subjeck bufriended and apparently attempted to cultivate VASLOUCHs 1, 2, and 3:(Iduntitles 2, 3, and 4). The. association was discoüraged by KUBARK because VASIOUCH-I and 2 were performing important functions in connuction with Cuban FI actlvities and contact with a possible RIS officer was not thought destreable. In September 1962 at the Invitation of Senhor Vazco Leltao de CUNHA, Brazilian Ambassador to Cuba and newly appointed Ambassador to the Soviet Union, VASLOUCH- 3 traveled to Moscow and accepted a clerical position at the Brazilian Embassy where she remainc for approximately two years. year later, in September 1963, Subject returned PCS to Moscow. Between December 1963 and February 1964, Subject made three attempts to see VASLOUCH-3. According to VASLOUCH-3, che contacts were by telephone only SECRET --- ## Page 12 ECRET 130 (CONTINUED) and she did not meet with Subject personally while in Moscow. 15. CONTACTS: KISHIN- 1. In December 1961 in La Paz, Bolivia, Subject was in contact with See paragraph 13 above and Identities. Subject was in contact in Panama City and on a flight from Panama City to Mexico City in December 1961 with Edmindo Fausto ZORRILLA Martinez, a Mexican citizen who had been traveling around Latin America. The nature-of this contact has not-been determined, Subject befriended and apparently attempted to develop in Havana VASLOUCHS 1, '2, and 3 See paragraph 13 above and Identities: 20. TRACES FOR LIAISON: See first page following. 21. IDENTITIES: See second page following. E C E T --- ## Page 13 SECRET Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV - DPOB: - 23 December 1927, Moscow: PASSPORTS: D016993, issued 24 August 1960 DOlO 264, issued 1965 POSITION: Third Secretary, Soviet Embassy, Mexico CIty. WIFE: Aleksandra Dimitrlyevna, born 20 August 1928, Moscow., Worked 1n. the Consular Office of the Soviet Embassy In Havana. Speaks poor spanish. SON: initrly Valentinovich, born 1959: DAUGHTER: Irina Valentinovna, born' ca. 1952... LANCUAGES: Subject speaks, fluent Spanish and poor English. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: He t's 6' tall, wetghs 185' lbs., has a strong build, blond wavy hatr, and-a concave forehead. TRAVEL: In 1960 Subject was designated to the Soviet Embassy in Argentina as a Military Attache, however, there is no. record that Subject ever filled that post. From September 1960 to September 1963, Subject and fámily were in Havana where Subject, served as an Attache at the Soviet Embassy. In December 1961, he accompanied the Soviet DYNAMO Soccer tean on a latin American tour as their escort and interpreter. ECRET 10+4446 113-66i74 P time n reat trin --- ## Page 14 14-00000 I pain 35 578749627 Misuach caritars 1ta f CADES SEPALATE CONCI ATTAC NOMI B TO HMM -3955 SECREI _IDENTITIES" IDENTITY ONE IDENTIFY TWO IDENTITY THREE IDENTITY FOUR DELGADILLO Menacho, Adalid, formerly a Captain on the Bolivian Police Force. KUBARK agent from 1960 to 1963. MATIAINEN, Laure Olavs, Honorary Finnish Counsel In Havana and KUBNEY contact since 1962. MATINAINEN, Estrella, wife of IDENTITY TWO. MATIKAINEN, Annels, daughter of IDENTITIES TWO and THREE. SECR ET sen no tamiere ge 13-0 the sand Jean as are on to said strengte the de not we she carbon read --- ## Page 15 DISPATCH CLASSIFICATION SECRET TO Ch 1c&, SR Division INTO, FROM Chief, WH Division Chief of Station, Mexico CLy i _SUBJECT 6. REDWOOD - Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412) ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES REFERENCE: MEXI 4363, "6 August 1965 XXXX PROCESSIND ACTION MARTEN TOO LUCEYING NO INDEXINO ARQUIREO ONLY QUALIFIED DESK CAN JUDGE INDEMINO MICROFILM - Subject's arrival in Mexico was reported in Reference. Attached are coples of subject's passport, obtained througti kITEMPO, no. D-010264, Issued 24 June 1965 in. Moscow and valla for flve years. i A me too for Willard C. CURTIS Attachment: Copies of Passport" Digtribution: 2 - CSR, w/att., as stated, H/W* 1. - CWH, w/o att. . GROUP 1 Eacteded fears auere dera rica, int CROSS REFERENCE TO CS COPY DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER HMMA -- 26881 CLASSIFICATION SECRET 201-285412 DATE 12 AUGUST 1965 NOS FILE NUMDER 201-285412 FEN ° P-11712 --- ## Page 16 UNION DES FEN BIOL'ES SNICTIO. ES SOCINUSTES PISSEPORT DIPLEMITIQUE *COiO] COGETCKHX СОЦИА МАСТИЧЕСКИХ •РЕСПУБЛИК Д Кº 010284 +eraps Decorteran Cecr --- ## Page 17 Entaltro Serrâtairo de 1° II:0. H9/ 000 3.2.304 кань syaa* --- ## Page 18 PERA MATINZCRA đel --- ## Page 19 14-00000 CAST 005854121 CLASSIFIED NESSAGE FIRE 40.. 244 SECRET CEBPROr. O'sIG SON/UNIT NOTIFIED Mexico Cirt SR-8 GRID COPR COP 16S 30 ADVANCE COP Dieuro Driero Devio REPRODUCTION-PROMIBITED SECRETS OICCIEZ " DIR CITE MEXI 4363 REDWOOD 1. LIFIRE REPORIS ARRIVAL 3 AUG VIA SABENA FLIGHT 555 OF VALENTIN LOGINOV, AGE 38 PPT D-P1P264, NEW THIRD SECRETARY SOVIET EMB MEXICO. 2: PRESUMABLY IDEN VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH LOGINOV 281-285412. REQUEST SUMMARY TRACES. -3. BELIEVED REPLACING NECHIPORENKO: 221-3058.70• SECRET CEN: 4563 3 AUG VIA SABENA 555 VALENTIN LOGINOV 38. PPT DE 10264 IMI D-BIEZSA SOVIET EMB MEXICO IDEN VALENTIN SEPGEYEVICH LOGINOV 201-285412 NECHIPORENKO 2e1-385878 BT SECRET AN L EF ABSTRACI 5267071571 •Ihoak • 7 AuG 55 BI 2756 1 201-285-7124 7A4665 201-285412 siderik. --- ## Page 20 1d-0d0d 10 FROM " DIRECTOR MESSACE FORE A SEER BE & MIRCH 2065 SiTINGSHINO 25-6-33 INFO: JARAVE 7116.5 MOSE dE 10ND 56705/00 10120 GUISE WAVE CITE DIA TYPIC VASLOUCH REF. TEN 1701 (1Y 30193) 95920 1. SUBJ REF (IDEN A) IS VASLOUCH 3, DAUGURER V-I (IDE-I) AND V-2, (YDEN C). V-1 AND V-2 CURRENTLY RESIDE PBRUSES AND LIVE BEEN HQS REPORTING ASSETS SINCE FEB 63. 2:: V-2 WORKED APPROX I2 YEARS BRAZILIAN EMBASSY PERLIES. WAS QUITE CLOSE TO ALSUPER AND FAMILY WEN HE HAD EID THERE AND TOURED FUSTEAL WITH HIM FOR NOITH NY LOGINOC V-3: CLOSE FRIEND ALSUPER DAUGHTER. EARLY 63 LOCAL SOY XGE TIPE WILO HAD PREVIOUS JUSTNESS CONTACTS WITH Y-2 MADE SOCIAL CONTACT WITH V-1 AND Y-2 IN RELATIVELI CLUSSY EFFORT DEVELOP THEM. V-1 AND Y-2 WERE INSTRUCTED BY VOS TO NOID FURTHER CONTACT: XGB OFFICER RETURNED PCS MOSCOW LATE AUG 63. BETWEEN DEC 63 AND FEB 64 HE MADE THREE MILD ATTEMPTS CONTACI V3 IN MOSCON: EFFORT CONTICT VASLOUCIES APPARENTLY- DROPPED WITH NO FURTiER - DEVELOPMENT. HQS HAS NO ADDITIONAL INTO TO COSFIRM OR DISPELL. ALSURAIS SUSPICIONS V-3 SOVIET PENETRATION. 4. V-3 HAS BEEN SOLENHAT NORRY TO PAHENTS AND IQS THADUGHOUT® OUR ASSOCIATION. PARENTS DESIRE SEE VIJ LOÇATED SAFELY SOME WESTERN CITY WITH GOOD JOB AND SECURE INCONE MATCHES HQS WISH ELIXINATE HER 0+*164a SECRET PRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THEISSUING DIRCH IS PROMELEO 5013285812 --- ## Page 21 MESSAGE FORM SECRET ROUTYS EXT DATE. TO TRQM DIRECTÖR CONT I INDEE O. NO INDEX P-FEE IN CS FILE NO. PAGE THO TO INFO an of AS SOURCE CONCERN HER: PARENTS. 86720 REQUEST STA TAKE NO ACTION THIS MATTER AT THIS TIME. HQS CONCERN PRIMARILY THAT WORRY ABOUT V-3 NOT BE ALLORED JEOPARDIZE FUNCTIQNING V-1 AND Y-2• V-3 MAY EVEN AGREE: SQNE FUTURE DATE ACT AS SW LINK BETWEEN V-I AND HQS IF SUCH CHANNEL EVER NEEDED. END Or MESSAGE Attrie DESSOND FITZGERALD C/#H C/VA/C/FI C/WH/C/HO Walter Cind (an drast) WH/5 →(by phonas SR/CI/KOB DCHD/C SINALAATIAL SILLIN OFFICIA SAC RET RIPRODUCTION SY OTHER THAN THEISULE OPISS iS FICTIONIO. +90,600 • Pay die --- ## Page 22 LAti DATE. 1O'. PROM r48. Кр1в. MESSAGE FORM 21 mI7C/YI/10 O O0 BECRET 6172 Di NO DOD 29 MARCH 1965 23 IRI IN CS TR NO 2'8-6-33 INTO: JAWAVE 27383 ROUTING DIRECTOR 29 MissiS. 2241₴1 To , CITI DE; 96921 TYPIC: VASLOUCH REE DIR 96120 -Time rai END OF MESSAGE C/wh/C/FI •C/WH/C/HO Walter C101 dra8t) 8f DESHOND FITZGERALI /WHA _(b$ phone) 15. JOHN I BR/CI/KGB nas and or phoney DOWHDA 1508-29 9B CR SIL ALPRODUCTION DY OTHEA THAN THE QUING ONICT TE FROHINITIO HART Coop rio --- ## Page 23 ACTION CLASSIFIED MESSAGE, POTAL.. COPIES SECRET PERSON/UNIT NOTICES. 9:53 AN '65 WH-8 AQVANCE COPY UN 1P, Dissoro MR BLE, DDP WH C-8. Co, CF/OP5, F5, SR-7 Reserve lay noto E Ta DIR INFO WAVE CITE. 7701 2 6 Aes 65 11170 25 JUNE 1053 MOUT SENT NAVED ON 23 MARCH NERGEDES MAGALHAES LINTO, PERSONAL SECRETARY ALSUPER 2, INTRODUCED MILKES TO ANNELL MATIKAINEN, WHO VISITING RIO FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH. MATIKAINEN SAID ALTHOUGH HER FÚTURE PLANS INDEFINITE, SHF HAD NO INTENTION RETURNING PSRUMEN, WHERE HER PARENTS ASSIGNED. SATO SHE MIGHT ACCEPT EMPLOYMENT IN NEW YORK. CITY OR WOULD RETURN TO EUROPE. HOWEVER, LIRIO IS ATTEMPTING TO INTEREST MATIRAINEN IN REMAIN- ING RIO AND ASKED MILKES IF MATIKATEN DID STAY, COULD ME-DIREC HER TO SOME AMERICAN COMPANY OR U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCE FOR MENT. EMPLOVESH MYLKES LEFT MATTER ÖPEN SAYING HE WOULD HAVE CO HAVE MORE INFO ON MATIKAINEN'S QUALIFICATiONS: .20 ONLY INFO SE MATIKALNEN CONTAINED iN REF SUPPLIED BY ALSURAH, WHO NOW. ON TWO YEAR LEAVE FROM HIS SERVICE AND ONLY IN ON INFREQUENT. VISITS, WILL ATTEMFI TO ELICIT MORE DETAILS FROM ALSURAN AT FIRST OPFORTUNITY.. 3. APPRECIATE HQS FORWARDING ANY ADDITIONAL INFO ON MATIKAINEN WHICH WOULD TEND TO CONFIRM AL SURANS DOUBIS ABOUT CREDIT lunches with Matikain. 201 sortable 001-285412 307 KA Int 35p-?° NAR 1b6: initiated --- ## Page 24 1d-0d0d IN 3.01.93/82. SECRET HEN AS NOTED REF. A.. INFO WAVE, ALSURAH REPORTED IN REF HE SUSPECTEU MATIKAINEN AS BEING SOVIET PENETRATION HIS EMBASSY IN MOSCOW. SHE WAS CURIOUS BEYOND NORMAL HOUNDS AND WANTED TO SEC. EVERY- THING. SHE WAS SUSPECTED OF HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH ONE OF THE BRAZILIAN OFFICIALS IN MOSCOW WHO HAD RAISED HER EMBASSY PAY TÓ SIDO DOLLARS A MONTH. SHE HAD PREVIOUSLY SERVED WITH AL SUPER-I IN PBRUMEN SECRET CFN. SECRET Hi 22 --- ## Page 25 CL 4SSIFIED MESSAGE SECRET 20160 ROUTING TD- DrACUTOR FROM MINE ACTIOH:. Las S INFO:: CL. C/22, Mr /207 61/02, 1/02, Ar/NE, V'F TOC'S SECRE 1720921 INTEL • SUPDATA: AMIAUP-5 FROM ANUNIDENTIFIED INFORMANT. PARA. 2: AMTAUP-5: RID: NO. INDEX: FILED 17/241827 REPORT CLASS SECRET CONTROLLED DISSEM COUNTRY: CUBA/USSR $U30 :. PASSPORT ACTIVITY AT THE SOVICT EMBASSY-IN HABANA TA. CONTINUED ARSENCE FRON-CUBA-OF SOVIET VICE CONSUL LOGUINOY COi: CD DECEMOSP. 1963 PARA: UNITED STATES, MIAMI (LA JANUARY 1964) I COMMENT: NO. DISSEMINATION OF THE ATTÄCHED TD FORTION OF THIS CIPLE HAS BEÉN. MADE OUTSIDE TH: AG:"CY PENDING RELEASE BY THE ACTION UNIT- (HolD for fimna.)- IN 08925 RELEASING INO: CATE DISTRIBUTED: BASED ON. TOCS PRECEDENCE ROUTIVE PRIORITY LIAISON: 501-585-4102 SECRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. Copy No. --- ## Page 26 CLASSIFIED MESSAGE SECRET ROUTING ACTION INFO • PAGE 2: - IN 88925 UFG-14505 AND HAS REPORTED MILITARY INFORMATION WHICH, FOR THE MOST PART, HAS BEEN ACQUIRED BY PERSONAL OBSERVATION. THE INFORMATION IN PARA, ! WAS OBTAINED FROM AN UNIDENTIFIED INFORMANT AND THAT IN PARA: 2 FROM PERSONAL OBSERVATION. IT COMMENT: TDCS PRECEDENCE ROUTINE PRIORITY RELEASING IMO: DATE DISTRIBUTED: BASED ON: LIAISON: SECRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. Copy No. --- ## Page 27 SECRET LANIRAL INTILLICUNCI AGENCY Inteligence infornation Cable COUNTRY DATE OF TOCS JUAFC! PRADEA: DATE ACQ. SOURCE ANJ APPRAISAd Id. 268925 MENT ASSAN ANT. _* III. ON ZEIDEGEMBER 1963, THERE WAS A LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE • AT THE SOVIET CONSULATE AND EMBASSY IN THE VEDADO SECTION OF THE: CITY OF HABANA WHO WERE APPARENTLY MAKING PREPARATIONS FOR DEPARTING FROM CUBA. SOME OF THESE INDIVIDUALS PRESENTED. A BOOK WITH A RED COVER BEARING THE CYRILLIC LETTERS "CCCP RPT CCCP" IN GOLD AND RECEIVED A FORM TO FILL OUT AND RETURN. OTHERS RECEIVED A WHITE CARD WITH A PHOTOGRAPH. ONE SOVIET ASKED FOR Á POSTPONEMENT OF HIS TRIP, SAYING THAT HE WAS MARRIÇO TO A CUBAN GIRL WHO WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO STAND THE COLD. A HIGH DIPLOMAT, WHO WORE GLASSES AND WHO WAS ABOUT 6$ YEARS OLD, ANGRILY EXPRESSED HIMSELF TO THE CUBANS IN SECRET STASE/ONE DIA RENTASI MAVY ANA IS SECORA NSA NIC AID USA OCS ONE OCA OIR 0O --- ## Page 28 CLASSIFICATION: DISSEMINATION CONTROLS SECRET • (Wh* y5hot 28) TOCS IN 00925 PAGE 2 SPANISH. COMMETA NEITHER LOCATION NOR CIRCUMSTANCES RELATIVE TO THIS EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE HIGH DIPLOMAT AND THE CUBANS WERE REPORTED:) 2.. • AS OF: 28 DECEMBER, SOVIET VICE CONSUL VALENTIN S. LOGUINOV HAD NOT RETURNED TO CUBA FROM THE SOVIET UNIQN: DISSEM: STATE (MIAMI). END OF MESSAGE CLASSIFICATION - DISSEMINATION CONTROLS SECRET ross 2096 APO. 6-03 -1. (15-30-46-47) CO....NUATON OF TOCS INFORMATION REPCR... 114771 --- ## Page 29 CONTINUATION OF DISPATCH SECRET ARMIA • 28501 Embassy offices. älCALLA thinks that Sunjoct left the Labnssy at 1115: having put is luggage the oor with license elates l9-JA. (Tials is the car Tegularly driven by LOCGINOV.) A LIbALLA pilOtO graph of subject is forwarded as Attachment B (leadquarters only). *. FOM LIESVOY it appears that LOGINOV was principally rosponsible for subjoct's travel arrangerents. •LOGINOV. probably met subject at the airport. since kIMllLU roported that LOGINOV left tic soviet kbassy in 10-DA at 0535 and returned at 0058 on 20 March 1960, apparently having dropped subject off at the liotel Aglies. subject's wife was not reported to have visited the Libassy. The station had not volieved that subject would be ablo to take the 21 march flight to lavana, there had been no Vladislav Sergeyevich: AORMUSHNIN (201-744341) had visitod the Cuban. Embassy in person on lộ March 1900, at which time he probably arranpod for Subject's visa. for Villard C. CURTIS =÷÷÷ r0" 530 UST DORISETON DASSSAATAT SECRET --- ## Page 30 DISPATCH CLASSIFICATION SECRET PROCISSINO ACTION XXX MARNTO FOR IS Chief, SR Division 1NP0 ORLY QUALIFILD DESE CAN NOGE INOCUME - Chiefe bit Division chicker station, Mexico Girill microrna SUBJECT REDKOOD/LCIMPROVE - Valentin Sericyovich LOGINOV (201-285+12) ACTION REQUIRED - RETURUNCOI Subject has been identified as a lok officer based on following incidents. on 12 February 1966 Moksandy Vladimirörich PRURHODO / P igh case officer, during a mecting with LIcozY-s, todd- 202328-s kha cis would crine subject to their next mecting and that Subject would be LICOZY-S's new case officer. During Januar! 1960 Cristobal la ToRREs Ponce,, shauffeur. employed by the in Mexico City, to the Soviet Embassy in regard to a Soviet visa for one of American Imbassy officials. spoke with subject, who, after asking whether ir would get TORRES-in trouble if he went to ended up by TORRES to dinner on 24 January TORRES did not meet Subject. that and on 8 February 1966 Subject called TORRES at thé American Embassy to ask why, he had not TORRES replied that he had lad to nork. Subject asked whether TORRES had located a person lio could teach him English: TORRES replied that one person whom he had asked had not been interested, and Subject asked him to cop. Looking Subject again called TORRES ön 9 February 1900, but TORRES was out. is noted that Subjcet's calls to TORRES have not appeared on LIENVOY and were therefore presumably made from a pay station.) for Killard C. CURTIS Dispribution: CSR CHH continuin CRONICALS CROSS REFERENCE TO GS COPY DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER INMA - 28390 CIASSIFICATION SECRET DATE 3 MARCI: 1966 HOS FHE NUMBER 201-285412 --- ## Page 31 0... 03 nec. 5 $3015 i E, Espera cente je' SECRET SOLONE CHIS CHICO CHEY 1191 31050707 3.3 :7532 10: CEO LIENSOY MO 1US SOULET FRESH TORCH AND URA DEFICER NIMOLAY CONFERDICE. VICE CONCH MENTIE SERCSVEVICH DELION ALSO DELD ETerEY-S 0: P4 THE THAT- LEONOVAD TO EE IN 10S000 C1: 1111. SHEFTO TELES EVERAL CIPLINGS TO GET REGULATION FOR LEGACY TO NO DELT LES LEAVING co 590A LIFEAT AND LICIUOY IT APPEARE THAT CONCUCAS PREDATING TO TE 0.12. 'LEAVE SODE POS. HE SOU LEAPIUS MITHOUT FAMILY APPAPENTUYLOS s74s 3G73E ' 3. DORS NEADGUAPTERO LIVE ELY INCICATIONS OR THAT. CONFERENCE LECYOU YA! FEATHESSING? HOEUCE LIEGLE SEPORTET BE MUNE THET GRONOR MES TOLE ME" SHAT HE GRAVLIS 2 JULY AND HOLD GLY STAY 2?.3AYS MBO 3AIO 115 4553 50.516K TUST SHE COULD MOT ACCOMFANY KIMO BEPORTING LIPEE M-REGIOU TELATIONSHIP EX PO CH. S BT. T --- ## Page 32 CLASBITY TO FILE NO. X-AIT TO PILE CLaUSIFIED MESSAGE SECRET ASON/UNIT. ROTIFTEO OTAL COPIT REFRODUCTION-PROMIBITED ACTION ADVANCE COPY UNIT TAFO WA 8. • (A RIO COPY O 000e0. mE, ue 5B8 cifees. c/icz, FoliNTE SECRET 2919452 CITE MEXICO CITY 8081 INFO DIRECIOR REDCOAT LCIMPROVE REF DIRECIOR 23740K PLS INCLUDE LIAISON TRACES. SECRET Scutadi 29 Jr 66 I 66625 #REQUESTEA. TANCES ON NICCLAS, JUHN GOSTAGEN. BT NNNN: fogens. 501-285-412 --- ## Page 33 B#16: 3654 GATE: 2S JULY 1956 Dissin are ran = €. D INDEN O NO INDEE O FILE IN'CS FILE NO. PEOis: DIRECTOR • WHS ORIO COPY МУ. БАЛЕ ГОНИ ДДІEВ: à. SECRET 1047190 5 6 I: RR -19501 VA: 20 20. 51°Z. CITE DIRECTOR TO. 23746- INFO MEXICO CITY. RSDCOAT LCIMPROVE MEXICO CITY 8020 (IN 62261) * NOT SENT REQUEST STATION TRACES FOR MEXICO CITY ON: •A. NICOLAS: JUAN BOSTROEN, BORN 1915 IN ST. PETERUBURG, RUSSIA, NOW VENEZUELAN CITIZEN. EMPLOYED AS "DIRECTOR OF PROJECT BY STEPHENS- ADAMSON DE MEXICO, FORMERLY SERVED IN U.S. NAVY. B. VALENTINA GRUSDOW DE BOSTROEN, PORN BRESLAU, GERMANY, 42 YEARS OLD, WENT TO USSR WHEN SMALL CHILD, WAS IN STALINGRAD IN 1942, WENT TO VENEZUELA POST WWIS NOW VENEZUELAN CITIZEN. BOTH BOSTROEN'S NOW LIVE CALLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSON 419, MEXICO CITY. FYI EXICAN OFFICIAL ADVISED STATION THAT VALENTIN S. LOGINOY, KNOWN KGB STAFF OFFICER MEXICO CiTY, APpARENTLY DEVELOPING POLICEMAN WHOM HE ASKED TO PROVIDE BOSTROEN HOME ADDRESS, HONS TELEPHONE AND PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT. •CONTINUED: HELEASINE BEFICER COORDIMATING OFFICENS SECRET REPRODUCTION DY OTHER THAN THO ISSUING OFPICE IS PRONIBITED. 006-0.85412 AUTHENICATIN! logins. --- ## Page 34 ORI* DATE: DISSEN SY O A MOCI O FILE INCISILENA. NFISAGE FORM TITAS CODIES: SECAST PAGE 8 OUTING 1'8 MOM. DIRECTOR •O RiD COPY • 14P08 M: SECRET -1 CITE DIREGTOR 23746 3. REL NEXICO CITY: TRACES DESIRED. NO TRACES FOS. NOTIFY IF LIAISON END OF MESSAGE WH Comment: *Reported LOGINOV recruitment pitch to unnamed LITEMPQ8 policeman to report on Nicolas Juan and Valentina. Grusdow de Bostroen. Requested additional data these: individuals to assist in providing LIRAN Into fOr: PNG Of. LOGINOY: WH/3VL "SB/O/WH/I SB/CI/K/ (in draft) 7 (in draft) (in draft). William Xias Broe DELLASTE OFFICIA COORDIMATINE OFFICERS SECRET REPROSUCTION SY OTHER THAN THE ISSUMG OFP.CE IS PROMIBITED. AUTHENTICATIN® dEFICER --- ## Page 35 DISPATCH SECRET Chief, Wl Division XXX PROCESSING ACTION MARRED POR INDEN INS DO MOLTINO REQUIRED ORLE QUALIFIO DESE CAR MOGE: INDURG Chief, SB Divleton Chief of Station, Mexico City SUBACT. L REDCOAT/LCIMPROVE - Iriformation on Local Sovlets passed to LIRAMA ACTION REQUIRLD • NEERENCES REFERENCE: MEXICO CITY - 8020 1. Transmitted herewith are a llst of Sovlet Intelligence personnel assigned to Mexico and a note on Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412) which were given by Chief of Station on 22 July to LIENVOY-2 for passage to LITEMPO-8 and LIRAMA. The circumstances were explained in Reference.: ?. Please note that the following items in the LOGINOV note are fictions of the Station a. that LOGINOV jolned the KGB In 1955. b. that he attended the KGB school (rom 1955 to 1957: C. that he was an officer in KGB Headquarters from 1957 to August 1960 d. that the money found in his sultcase. in Paname in December 1961 was for Latin American Communist Parties (lt probably was): c. that we have known LOGINOV as a KGR officer sirice 1958 for/willard C. CURTiS Attachment: List of Soviet intelligence personnel and note on LOGINOV •Distribution: 2 - CWH, w/att. (1 copy); H/W 1 - CSB, w/att (1 copy), H/W INTT STIOSS REFERENCE TO iS COPY OISPATCH STRESOL AND MUMMACR HMMA - 29626 GROL 1 sciates iror solomatic 7:01-2:35417 DATE 27 JULY 1966 HOS FILE NUMBER 201-285412 --- ## Page 36 SECRET Valcatin Sergeyorich LCOLNOV DC3: 23. Docoolbc 1927: Position: Tatro Secretary la sho Consular Section Of tic Sovic: Embassy, Mcxico D. F. Residence: Tenselo Esteva 15-1, Colonia Facubaja: Automobile: 1965 Clievrole Impal, license 19 DJ. Languages: Fluent Spantsa, falt Erglish Carcor: 1955: Joked the KOB 1955-57 Attendad tao KGS tratning ecicol 1957:- Augue: 1959: Oficer in KGO Ficudguariers, Moscow Son: 1963-Sopt 1953: Attache In Huvara, Cuba Decomics 1951: Travelled to Fanatha and Ecuador wich a Sorlos soccer toam. On this trip he curried & large sum ci money lot the Communist Patiles ci Punania, and Equador. 17 May 1062: Tratoied Mexico on route to the USSK for leave. 9 Soptember 1963: Licit Cuba to rctuza to tice USSR Sebterabar 1963:- July 1955: Officer 1a KCB Readquarters, Moscow. 3 August 1955: Arrived Mcnico In Mexico LCGINOV replaced OlEg M. NECHPORENKO, anoter KES citicer cud tobk ovcr all of NECHONEND's tolligence agents and dacles. in January 1956 he attempied to cultivate and recruit a chauticur ce the American Embassy la Minico. LOONOV Is an unusually scrive and capable intelligence catcer. Since ho has almost ns crort duties ho ls able to spond about 9511 ; or his time on intelligence acelvity, We have known that bels a io3 culcer since 1953. His Immediate KGb chict in Merico is Rival A. YATSKOV. is corr Tn1y874676 781-285418 --- ## Page 37 SECAZi Soviet Incolligcace. Ofileers Stailonod Li Mcsico 1. KGB (Commlisco fo= State Sucurley) Chieti Sergcy S. KONSTANTLOY Deputy Chlei, Alckoonar V. PRIKRODRO OFFICERS: Yergenly I. BEDRIN Ivan A. BEKETCV. Alcksande M. BROVKIN VladImIr A. DOLGOV Yevgeniy N. CORLITSYN: Corto A. KAZANTSLY Vladislavis. KORA USAKIN Valcatin I. CuCiteROV Svycteslav F. KUZNETSOV Nikolay S. LEO:OV Valcuti S. LCOn OV Vestity S. MESOSINKOV Lconid V. NutkO30V Aleksandr 4. NKIFIN Viadalr N. RADVANSKTY: Vladimir i, SEPAKEVICH Ccorgly S. VISKO Pavel A. YATSKOV Yurly ZHURIN Corto S. ZOONIN 2. GRU (Militasy Istciligcico) Cilof Vladimir N. SOKOLOV Doputy Cilel: Gorgly A. SECHUCHIN OFFICERS: Alessandr M. DENISOV. PetT F. CORELOV VladImir P. COROLETS •Yuriy.N.. ISAYEV Anatoliy V. KARABACH VIKtOr L. KHUKHOREV Yurly A. MITROFOLSKIY Valerly:V. SOKOLLY Rusion A. TUCANN 8.. Kenstartin F. VORONKOV. Ivan: V. YELFIMOV --- ## Page 38 SECRET Patiod los DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE SUBJECT CE DOCUMENT DOCUMENT IDENTLVICATION RI PILA-NO. G. DATE T: BOURCE CAVATONTATA, DAVE DO UNPO. D. RUAGUATION TiT: DAY! DOCUMENT. DISPOSITION what ther • PRALIMENT INIORHATION LCGIMOVE VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH 201-285412 SEXM DOB CIT 7 OCC 7. 050-008-010 HMMA:29544 20 JUL 66 R 6607281146 FILE IN 201-285712- FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO. • 687 SECRET 68•488 --- ## Page 39 DISPATCH SECRET TO Chilet, WH Divlsion 25.5 PROCESSING ACTION. XXX MAND, CE NOTE NO CATCHING BEGINED INFO Chlef, SB Division FACA. Chlef of Station, Mexico Cly AN CROFILM SUBJECT REDOÖAT/LIMPROVE - Ecard YEBELMAN Freminger ACTION RIQUIRED - REFURENCES 1. LIOOZY-5 reported that on 24 June 1966 bls KGB case oncer, Valem in Sergeyevich LOCINOV (201-285412); stopped by bts affloe on eglilmate bustness, then sold be had: some (operational) businoss for him, LICOZY 5 demurred, but LOGINOV went ahead, took a plece of paper out and began reading from it, asking LIOOZY-S lf he knew Than an i not want to do in his hot h 2, 030 and he a co want LIOOZY-S to do anything, it was just that he did not know who be was. LIOOZY-5 refused to discuss it further. When LOGINOV left LICOZY-5"s office he left behind a plece of paper with the following wrkten on l la Eduardo Vebelman, about 55 years old, Mexican of Jewish extraction, owner of a secl plant and a firm which selle photographle egiloment, Came to Mexico during World War I. Lives in the Pedregal at Teololco 320, His son Is Mauricio Vebelman. Station files led no traces on anyone named WEBELMAN: The 1965 Mexico Ciry Telephone Directory lists the following: ArIo ®WEBELMAN, Arts Fotograficos, Uruapan 7, Tel, 11-44-77 Eduardo WEBELMAN, Teoloico 320, tel, 48-57-17 WEBELMAN Hermanos, S, 4., Paseo de la Reforma 308, Ist floor, tel: 11-41-90 and 11-49-79: • CONTINUED - Distr butlon: 2 - CWH CROSS REFERENCE 1O" Cert DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER HMMA - 29477 CLASSiFICATION SURET 20:: 7*5 5c 4-1/119 DATE 201-285412 14 JULY 1966 HOS TIRE NOMBER 201- --- ## Page 40 14-00000 SECRET CONTINUATION OF DISPATCH HMMA - 29477 3. The Mexican Cobemacion (ei ai Subjoct (apparently lemical with LOGINOY's "Vebelman') was revlewed on ll July 1966, I shows that Subject was born on 7 October 1917 In Warsaw, Poland, (s Jewish, and came to Mexico ou 8 December: 1939 as a student. la 1942 be had received "Immigrante" statue and was working for Adolfo "WEBLLMAN Coelpe (2), manager of WEBELMANý Clara flim then located at Aluminio 192 ta Mexico, D. F. (Comment:: Adolto WEGELMAN le presumably a relative of Subject's bur nac bis tather,, who le given as Saymon WEBELMAN,) The last entry in the tile la dated 1941. d. Headquarters traces on subjact are requested, fox/willard C, CURTIS RA BID ZEUL LO WVWE INUCE? WILINIED SECRET Page 2 --- ## Page 41 ''dad gen is" DISPATCH maRio 108 in74*i 1040 QUALIND ALLA I CAN MODE INDENIAO Chirte ni lavision cust of sention, lexie re We ACTION MIQUIRED - REPER NEPTRENCE: 1394-301966 d6 Jinic 1068.. CIZ OCC •B". ÷:.. wit: Vitaly distantinerien tanny, 2u-355o0r) t Perior fro" 27 May Is 1 Jine 1966. Ta roonre! ilintificu mean seres te croceed dishe positionl al 5i5 June 1900.. 31 tiny roceived follOws LILYRIC suncillace rocits on Salaact have sunsecuently 0931 hrs: 1023 hrs: 1411 hrs: ubige left the soviet: Crhassy alch: subjera mirered the Serice tonger alame Suhject list the Sorict Inhasey torether with Perry Antonovich AlL e01-120225) mid dendaila Vasive Ditcr (201-790799) in in it Subject tral the soviet triass! Subject lo"i the soviet Embassy tich alent,m 2 hine 1037 l:rs: • 1145 kirs: 1606 hrs: 16156. 118*9: 1137 Wr Subjeet interei the : oviet massy Subject left the soviet Eraser mit KOVSTLTINM 1202-101799) in die lecteres co istin,in. Distritation: AS REFPRINCE 1O. SPATCH STEERA AND MUNGER. • 1959 DisT 501.285-412 --- ## Page 42 COMTINUATION.OF DiSPATCH SEC687 26*21 1021 Prs: subjeet autorod. the Soviet talassy with YATeNOV in the latter; coi. 6 .June 7 turic 1040 has: 1413 hrs: Rahiere entrrod the soviet Frasso alone. subire ieft the Soviet arassy with alcasmor Vladimrich pRimonta (201-202379) in the lotter's car. subjrer retumal to the subice: lot: soviet irrassy with Myrsky in the lntter's.car. Subject entered cle Soviet Inhassy with YATSkO! in (as not spen lesvinr.) entered the Sovict Intase with Vasilly Stormovich 1053 hT VIRÖSNTKW/(201-275016} in tie latter's car Mobil the latter's g June 1130 hrs: Subjeet entered the Soviet Inhassy with KONSTNTISOV . and Sorin Tarascvich IZAROV (201-049257) in KONSTANTINO'S Car. 1200 hrs: Subject left the soviet Enhassy with MIROSINIKOV me KaNSTATIVOl in the latters car. 1356 hrs: retured to the Soviet latassy with MROS NIKOV Rad MiNSTANTION 1405 hrs: Suhjest arain left the soviet inhassy wich MIrosiNikay ind NONSTATINOV: The following infomation is mailable on the persus neitioned above as being with suhjait: do: ¡ONSTANTINO! iS ArON tO be the iGN resident. YATSKOV is a inona KOB officer, probably in CI. e. IndiOr is a lion lGa officer who works for Ya"Sank. ¿ PATRIODÃO iS a know iG officer ind prohably the deputy resident. C" MIROSENIKOV is probably the jon chauffeur. "RAZAROV is the mbassador, no low intollirence affiliation. 'SONOLINA is the wife di an Assistant itilitary Attache. Pratherit Wrensing did tof that i slee : *530 --- ## Page 43 C56 PROCESSING ICION DISPATCH SECRET Chief, MI Division Chief, St Division 81050 Chief of station, Mexico City SUBJECT REICHAT/UCI PROVE -EMeStO ClAZAND FerrinO ICTION RIQUIATO. RESERENCE REFERENCE: MEXICO CITY 7688 XXX CATO NUDGE CACOXINO Transmitted herewith is the local CREWY report on Subject which was promised. ODEvY still has not lem able to centact sulject in arier to nut him in touch with the station but hones te in so during the weik of 4 hily. Big id for/hilllard C. CirTIS Enclosure: ODENVY Report Distrihution: 2 - CHi, Lt - C5B, M/enc1. (2 conies), 11/4 (1 copy), l COPY Enciated tram sulana:: 201-8:04124 CROSS REFERENCE TO DISPATCH SYMBDI ANO RUNABER 13914 - 29125 CASSIFICATION SECRET ASE NEC: 13 DATE 30 SE MOS ThE NUBIBER 196€ FFV: P=1.313 --- ## Page 44 FBI REPORT (ATTACHENT TO IMMA 29325). DATE: 27 JUNE 1966 CLASSIFICATION: SECRET. SURJECT: ERNESTO CHAZARO PEREGRINO 134-815 (6-27-66) FROM MEXICO CITY --- ## Page 45 SUBJECT SECRET • 10) DOCUMENT TRANSFER AÑD CROSS REFERENCE DOCUMENT: IDENPIFICAPION RO FILE NO: OISPATEM OR SOURCE DOG. BYMBOL AS. P. BOUNCE. CRYPTORYN D, DATE OF INTO. 10. DI SEEM IRATRO 10 DOCLIENT DISPOSiTION TRANSFERRED - PO & DATE STALUATION PRALINENI LÖGINOV, VALENTIN. SERGEYEVICH 201-285412 SEX M DOA 8 201-355606 ИNMA-29198 16 JUN 66 CIT. OCC KNOWN KGB® 201-395608 MEXICO• IN CONTACT WITH V. BOYAROV 1 JUN DOO MEXICO CITY. _6606240887 FILE IN 2012HEC/J FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO. 80$9 807 00. SECRET 17088₴ --- ## Page 46 14-00000 DISPATCH CLASSIFICATIÓN SECRET PROCISSING ACTION. airero 109 900 Chief, SR Division XXx! DO NOTINE BEGUEED air QUALIntO ArSa chief, kli Division chiot of station, Hexico crie CAN NOR MOCUME RIDWOOD/LCIMPROVL • KGB and GRU Residencies in Mexico CIty ACTION FROL Attached are analyses of the XGR and GRU residencies in Mexico City, Included are only those officers who are prohibly or known to be intelliyence officers.: Of the 52 Soviets currently assigned to Mexico. Ciry, 22 are idontified intelligence officers and 13 probably intelligence officers, i.e. roughly 67% of the total Soviet colony. 2. The case officers have not neen divided irto separate taigot groups, with the exception of KGB S& in rie the Station's information is too fragmentary for a realistic irration With the exception of s. is. known in nes tne NGB. residont, the positions of resident and deputy resident are inconfirmed, but ropresent the Station's best guess: 128.8 37. for Hillard C. CURTIS LOGINOW Attachment: NGE and GRU Residencies. Distribution: :? • CSR, w/att. (2 copies). i - Chil, w/att. (1 copy), i/r i!:. CROSS REFERENCE TO 28 April 1966 101-885412 --- ## Page 47 •CROFILMEÙ EAT 4 1085 0x2. 2520 352- SECRET 2P ATTACIENT TO MINA : 28808 DATED _2S APRIL. 1000 Nob Residency in Mexico City April 1906 -....... ECruSYE: A. V. PRINIONAO (bnowi.so: 90%101 den gated it REM. CP Liaison: I. A. "RAZANISLIM (KNOW responsible to intelligence officor, possibly now CP.SU rather than sGd).r... A!14 lergaris Case Offacers: r.. ANDREYLE (suspect) - PROVIN (suspecta DOLGOV -Isuspoct N POKLITSYN (suspect): FORMOSHNA (suspect) AUCHEROV (suspect" F KUZNETSOV. (known) LEONOV (known)irls: VINIFOROV (suspect)?* V •G P.. I $ TISKO: (knonn)irri TAÏSION (KNOWN+. Sat Case Officers * : A.. Referentura p., GULIA (suspeiry V.. N. "RADVANSATY (ANONJA Chauffeur P. S. MiROSININOV (SUSpeELL KRORA KGS:. Suspect KGB:: Diplomatic Cover: Immorcial Cover: Pross. Cover: tabassy Laployer: --- ## Page 48 SECRET ATTACIMENT TO LINNA • 28803 DATED _ES NULL 1960 GRu Residency in Merico city Resident: V. N. SOKOLOV (Anown April 1500 jee - 1' lee poria" Case Officers: ail; 1. 1. N. PENISOV (knOwn) CORALOV (AnOIn). V KARABACH (suspoce)! 15295- KHUMOREV. (known): ZETROPOLSKTY (AMOW") V R. SOLOLIN (Anowiii: muciNti (suspect) F. FORONKOV (known)Cpr Code Clerk: I.V. YALFINOV (know). - Chauffeur: .V. P. KOROLTS (known)..., KnOWN GRUE Suspect GRU: Military Cover: Diplomatic Cover: Commorcial Cover •Pross Cover: --- ## Page 49 14-00000 I-ICE TO FILE AO.. DESTROY OSi6. MEXICO BITY LLASSIFIED MESSAGE, SECRET PERSON UNIT ROTSEIRO RIPRCOUCTION PRONIDITED ADVANCE COPT UNIT & RID COPY SECRET 1922502 ¿INFO DIR CITE MEXI 7025 20 AR 66 0 00 064 REDWOOD LCIMPROVE REF: DIR 95441 1• ACCORDING L'IENVOY 18 APR, IVANÁ.. tEKETOV CITED REF, CONTACTED COSTA RICAN EMBASSY MEXI AND INGUIRED. RE STATUS HIS VISA. HE TOLD CHECK LATER SINCE COSIA RICAN EMB STILL HAD NO WORD: A FEW MINUTES LATER VALENTIN SO LOSINOV (281-2854122 ALSO CALLED COSTA RICAN EMB AND SAID HE WANTED VISA FOR HIMSELF. WHEN ASKED IF HE HAD DIP OR OFFICIAL PASSPORT HE SAID HE HELD OFFICIAL PASSPORT. HE THEN TOLD TO BRING PASSPORT TO EMBASSY. 3. VISA PROBABLY FOR BEKETOV SINCE LOGINOV HOLDS. LIP PASSPORT: LOGINOV VICE CONSUL AND SUSPECT KGB OFFICER. SECRET l.7025 95441 LIENVOY 18 APR. IVAN A. BEXETOU REF COSTA RICAN E EMB NO WORD A VALENTIN S. LOGINOV (201-235412) EMZ DIP BEKETOV LOGINOV DIP KGB BT SECRET 201.285412 --- ## Page 50 SECRET Chlof, SK Division Corlef, Ms: Chief of Statios, Mexico City REDHOOU - RusteR O. #BAANITOV (101-785564) REFERENCLS: 8: MEXI-0O31; C.. CIR-90901. As raporiod In Reference A., Subject and fils nife arrived in Mexico City at 0550 hours on: 20 March is06 via Canadian Pacific flight 421 fIon Buenos Alres. They departed Mexico City at 1300 hours on 11 March 1yo0 via Cuna flicht 4o5 for davard. tho mention of thoir departuro from Vexico City in the herspaper clipping forwaried as Attachnent A. on 10 March 19c0 Sovler Vico Consul known kobi made reservations. at the lotel. Agnes in toxico City (frequently used by Soviots) for a couple with a child for the night of 20 Karch 1900.. This reservation was undoubtedly for Subjoct, however," thoro has beon no oter nention of the child: Ae 0830 on 2l March 1956 (Subject] called the sovlet invassy fron the Hotel agnos and said be vould liho to come over to pay perhaps for the roos and the Cutana eickets]. 3. LICALLA reported seoing Suuject at kho Soviet labassy in Moxlco Clty at 1015 hours ou 21 Horch 1960. Subject was seen talkiug priucipally with tabassy Counselor boris Alelsandrovich, KAZANISEV (201-028975), suspect CPSU representativo), aud also briefly with Second Secretary Aleisandr Mikhaylovich DENISOV (201-726491) known GRU, Ambassador Somen TAraSOViCh BALAROY (201-049257 and 40154l Pavel Antonovich YATSAOV (201-120123, Anose K60),- At 1040- Subject was seen entering the Embassy building with KAZANTSEV. through the entranco which leads to the koferentura but also connects win othor continued Attachments: A. debsclip B. dolCAikA photos Distribution: 2 CSR, b/att.. as stated, 1l/H 1 CHil, W/o atts. w/o att Xiet sheets nade LibiA - 28591 serace do 20 146.1160-2161 SECRET Encadet too antinic AV2379338 130 éle hagener 201 78 MARCH 1906 201. 085412 2П+- #-*8 --- ## Page 51 DISPATCH 10 • Chief, Va DIv18100 CDlof, SB Division Chief. Of Statton, Hexico Clts SUBACT REDCOAT /CIMPROVE - Ernesto CHAZARO PerS clea TRON REQUIRED REFURENCES REPRINCh: NNW-14816, 38 Angues 1908 PROKESSING ¡ANCO POR MORTIN NO NOCKING REQUIRE. ONLY QUALILO DESIR CAN NOGE INOCHE : The Station'e final report on Subjeet uns forwarded In OTIA-29714, 9 August 1966. for/willard C. CURTIS рідної. Distribution: 2 2 CHH CROUP 1 20: 221 CS CoRE TO LH/1 CROSS REFERENCE TO OISPATCH STREOL AND MUMBER ENMA • 29913 CLASSIFICATION ES GET FRED M 201-800413 DATE 31 MOS FRE NUMBEN 201-800412 AUGUST 1960 --- ## Page 52 DISPATCH SECRET PROCISSING ACHION Chicl, WH Dlylslon INDEXING. BEGUIED Chlef, SB Divlsion Chiet of statloa, Moxico Ckÿ- REDOOST/LCIMPROVE - EmOto CHAZARO Persex lo REQUINTO REFERENCES REFERENCE: HMMA -29325, 30 June 1966 •On 7 July 1966, Ling A. ORONSKY and a local representarte LNERCO tirervlewed Subjoct In Veracruz, Mexico, It became. obvlous at that rime that subject had fabricated mout of hla srory as will be shown in the artached memorandum to local LNERGO. 2.: The Station has no plans for using Subject in any capacly wha for/Willard C. CURTIS Attachment: Copy of Memo to LNERCO Dlerr but lon: 3 CWH, w/at (1 copy). H/W ¿ - CS, w/ate (l copy), H/W CROSS AÉTERENCE TO COPY CASPATCH STATEDL AND HUMBER HMMA - 29714 SECRET 13: 201=8004121 DATE 9 AUGUST 1966 nestring , 2 15 412 EEN: R-12818 --- ## Page 53 14-00000 SECRET 21 July 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: 13 2227. SUBJECT: Emento CHAZARO Peregrbo li. Referanco ta made to your memorandim dared 27.Jm 1906 and to the literviow with subject conducted in Voracrus on 7 July 1900 by of your office and a representative of this office. We wish to make the following abdervat lons regirding Subject's atatementa ln connection with la encounters wih Sovler Embassy Third Secretary, Valentin SO LOGINOV. 3: Regarding subject's clalm to have vialted Mextoo Ciry: on or abour 16 May 1906 and to have conticted the Sovlot Embassy ou or abair 18 May 1960, thia office has establlshed the fact that a contact es deveribed ly Subjoct ald noi take place at any time đur log the parled 10 through 30 May 1966, 3. Subject made stremens to the olfect that ho had res LOGINOV and a second Sovlet at an unknown restaurant at 1800 hours on. or about IS May, He clalinod to bave talked to these two Sovlete for approximately one hour (le. mill about 1900 bours) atter which they lett the rescaurant, walked to and entered LOGINQY"s car, drove to an unknown apartmem near the Soylet kimbaasy. parked the car and enered the apartment and then phoned three collisirls who arrived vichla 20 minutes. Followtog the arrival, ot the girls Subject escused himself and left the apartien abour 1900 r 1930 bours. To our knowledge there la no precodant for the KGB using call-guis for the purpose and in che manner deser thed by Subject. Fails: d.? 9. aug if SCURET --- ## Page 54 SECRET Subject stared that he belloved that the automoblle artren by LOGINOV. an automobile that be had seen several times, bare the llcense number "67," Our recorde show that no Sovle Embasay offictal or employee drives an automobile wuh the number 67 or 76. LOCINOV drives an automobile with Mexico Cliy diplomatic license 19 DA. Subject's statements to the effect that LOGINOY deapos lied 30, 000. 00 Mexican paradare sub fole account ta she Banco de Londres in Veracruz as a "git for nothing" and then took the money back when Subject refused it; ls not in keoping with our exper lence with regird to KGB modus operandl. ALso, laformat lon avallable to this olfice indicates that according to established Mexican banking practices it le nos possible to set up a checking account without the presence of the owner of the account who mus slyn aignature carde lor compartoon wuh the signatures on checks. б.! Subjecia general vaguances as to citen, times, addresses and locationg in connection with bile encountera # ich LOGINOV, in addirion to those points cited above, leada us co the conclusion that Subject has labelented a large portion of what he has stated. Thie office has little doute that be did meet LOGINOV.. In Yeracruz during carly May 1966 ln connection with the inlising Sover sallor, but we cousider his account of contacts with LOGINOV rubsequent to thia occasion as fabrication. 7: In vlaw of the above and in view of Subject's statements n july so the etlect that be had absolutely no dealre to becom malved with perocanel of eltner the Sovlet or. American Embassle and wished to remata completely "neural, this offce ts not Considering using Subject as an Imormant of any kind SECRET --- ## Page 55 CLASSIA.. 166 N0. PILE MINO HiT. TO. DRAMCH O besTior Osie. WENT 6410755 WHIS CLASSIFIED MESSAGE SECRET PERSON/UNIS NOTIFIRO 35 REPRODUCTION PROMIBITEO 214 O RID COPY ADVANCH• COP Dieuro Ronio uses INFO SECRET 230U2OZ CITE MEXICO CITY BUZN DIRECT OR REDCOAT LCIMPROVE: 1. EARLY MORNING 22 JULY LITEYPO-8 CALLED COS AT HOME AND IN EXCITED MANNER SAID HAD URGENT REQUEST.. HE SENT LIENVOY -2 TO SEE COS TO ASK FOR INFO ON VALENTINS, LOGINOV PROVING HE A "SOVIET SPY" AND FOR LIST OF" ALL SOVIET SPIES IN MEXICO." LITEMPO-8 VIA LIENVOY? SAID REQUEST COMES FROM LIRAMA WHO PERSONALLY INTERESTED •AND INTIMATED"WE MAY HAVE. SAME SITUATION AS 1959". & WHEN GOM EXPELLED TWO SOVIETS FOR CONTACTS WITH LEADERS OF RAILROAD STRIKE). 2. SAME MORNING: COS PASSED A PAPER ." PROVING" LOGINOV IS ACTIVE AND DANGEROUS KGB OFFICER AND A LiST OF IS SOVIET INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS IN MEXI TO LIENVÖY-2 FOR PASSAGE TO LITEMPO-8/LIRAMAS. SEE HiMA 28390 OF S MARCH FOR REFERENCE TO LOG INOV. APPROACH TO CHAUFFEUR. 3. LAITER SAME DAY COS RECEIVED PERSONAL 32 Jut 66 &2261 бостранн Loginor SECRET 701-085412 find. --- ## Page 56 td-nn0d PADE TWO MEXICO CIlY SUedS COME i LETTER FROM LITEYPO-S VIA LITEMPO-4 STATING: LOGINOV HAD BEEN COMPLAINING FOR SOME: TIME ON LACK OF POLICE ACTION ON RADIO ALLEGESLY STOLEN FROM HIS COMMENT: NO CONFIRMATION FROM OTHER STATIOSOuRCES). FINALLY CHIEF OF METROPOLITAN DISTRICT POLICE, GEN. LUIS CUETO RAMIREZ SENT OUT AN UNNAMED POLICEMAN TO INVESTIGATE. ON 19 JULY POLICEMAN CONTACTED POLICEMAN 5, 000 PESOS PER MONTH - TO WORK: FOR HIM ON CERTAIN MATTERS" POLICEMAN TEMPORIZED AND ASKED HIS SUPERIORS FOR INSTRUCTIONS. MATTER CALLED TO LITEMPO-8 ATTENTION BY GEN. CLETO, LITEMPO-S INSTRUCIED THE POLICEMAN TO GO AHEAD ON 21 JULY POLICEMAN RECONTACTED LOGINOV AND RECEIVED. FIRST "ASSIGNMENT:" TO DETERMINE HOME ADDRESS, HOME TELPHONE AND PLACE OF EMPLOYENENT •OF NICOLAS JUAN BOSTROEN AND WIFE VALEVIINA GRÚSDOW DE SOSTROEN, BOTH. VENEZUELAN CITIZENS. 1. LITEMPO-A OBTAINED FOLLOWING INFORMATIO SECRETS --- ## Page 57 2861 PACE THRSE MEXICO CITY SORO SECRET. ON SOSTROENS FROM GODERNACION. FILES: A. NICOLAS JUAN SOSIRDEN, 1915 IN ST. PETERSSURG, RUSSIA, VENEZUELAN CITIZEY. EMPLOYED AS " PIRECTOR OF PROJECTS" EY STÉPHENS-ADAMSON DE MEXICO. FORMERLY SERVED. IN US NAVY. SO VALENTINARÚSOON DE SOSTROEN, BORN BRESLAU, GERMANY, FORMERLY LAS IRANSLATOR OR TEACHER OF RUSSIAN AT UN, NOW. TEACHER OF RUSSIAN AT IBERO-AERICANO UNIVERSITY, MEXI, VENEZUELAN CITIZEN: 5. STATION TRACES: ON 18 SEE LOSS OR RICHARD L. POTTS, AMERICAN GENERAL PRACTICIONER MEXI AND STATION CONTACT WHO RECENTLY RETURNED US REPORTED FOLLOWING ON MRS. FOSIRDEN WHO HIS PATIENT: MRS. VALENTINA BOE STROEM, 41 YEARS OLD, RESIDES CALLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSOV 419, MEXI. WAS 50RN VENEZUELA, VENI USS? THEN SALL CHILD, WAS IN STALINGRAD IN 1942. RETURNED VENEZUELA AFTER WIL, NOW VENEZUELAN CITIZEN, HAS RESIDED MEXI SEVERAL YEARS WITH BERRED ARDS a 02 001 14190.9631 wenty aston --- ## Page 58 PAGE FOUR MEXICO CITY SO2A SECRET HUSEANO U WHO FORMER SOV CITIZEN VOY VENEZLELAN CITIZEN. COUPLE HAS INO JEENAGE DAUGHTERS. HUSBAND WORKS FOR AMERICAN COMPANY VEXI. NEITHER HAS CONTACI, WITH LOCAL RUSSIAN COLOVY (SIC) SINCE DONT WANT JEOPARDIZE HUSBAND'S JOB. BOTH SPEAK SEVERAL LANGUAGES. VIFE APPEARS NEITHER PRO OR ANTI SOVIET. POLIS REPORTED ABOVE INFO BECAUSE HE THOUGHT IT STRANGE DUE AGE DIFFERENCE AND NÓ OBVIOUS CONVECT ION THAT YRS. BOESTROEM RECOMMENDED AS PATIENT. BERINA JAVILA MOLINA DE OSEGUEDA, AGE 64, WIFE OF DR. PAUL •OSEGUEDA PELALA (201-88063) G. REQUEST HOS TRACES ON BOSTROEN/EDESTROEM COUPLE, ESPECIALLY ANYTHING WHICH COS COULD USE TO ENCOURAGE LIRAMA TO EXPELL LOGINOU WHICH IMMEDIATE STATION OBJECTIVE. in BT. --- ## Page 59 14-00000 SECRET Date: November 24, 1965 TO! Mr. Winston M. Seott Henry C, Johnson Legal Attache. Subjeat! Travel of Soviet to Mazatian Your file #9808 This dorument is for the use of your arcady caig auel neither in nor its contents should to further distri ured without appropriate authorisation. Reference 1s made to your memorandum dated November 2, 1965• A rellable source at Mazatian, Sinaloa, has 1n formed that the Soviet scientifio ship LIRA, of 2,435 tons and carrying a crew of 76, was at Mazatlan fron Ootober: 23-28, 1965• Ariother rellable source advised that a person belleved to be from the Soviet Embassy; Mex1oo, D.F.s visited this ship while it was in port; however, he was not Identifled: аз. # LOG/NOV p- 11712 SECRET. File CROST 1, Excluded dora sulematic ++07-0-08-999 399901-9 P-11712 --- ## Page 60 3. Goate 005 25. October: 1955 5. Fil Valentin INGIROV: In their reply to a request we sent them for traces of subject, our headquarters have revlied as follows: •. Valentin 'S, LOGINOV was assistant Haval attoché at the Soviet Embassy in BUaNes itREs in 1960, and was listed as Attache in Havina in 1961-53, where his exact dutes were. not known . If he now assumes NSCHIPORENKO'S post of Vice-Consul, his career appeare to be an unusual one, and he must be presumed to be an intelligence officer" 2. Does this check with your own inforation? Rice from hath 37000.65 Reply a sterile boin 4) Cafy to 502-4) Cry% 502.6 P-11712 COPIES MADE --- ## Page 61 4-00001 SECRET $ November 1965 *C-Ma miip ste MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. lienry C. Johnson, Legal Attache Dinston M. Scott Travel of Soviots to Mazatlan 1. This office has recolved a report that two membors: of the Soviet Enbassy. in Mexico City, Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV and. Yovgeniy Nikolayevich GORLITSYN, planned to travel. by air to Nazatlan on 2 November 1965; The length of their stay and the This office would appreclate recciving information availablo to you on the trip of these Soviets THIS •INFORMATION: IS PROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE• :IT MÜST NOT BE: DISSEMINATED IN MIOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY: 0•9833 Distribution: Original - Addressee 1 =-50-2-4/A 1 • P-11712 1 P-11163. ECRET histoul! Ercltea tras aaiszalit CUERETINOS TAN HtLasal," sllarhe --- ## Page 62 14-1000 3 Hovember 1955 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD FROM: ORONSKE SUBJECT: LICOWL-1 сул. lo P- 8451 P... 8588 Р - 1175г Belon 1s a aunmary of the noteworthy items from bubjeot during meetings with him in September and Ootober. Lo: During September the meeting site was changed to the stroots between Merida and Morol on Puebla atreet IniColonia Roma. Subject walks along Püobla street and I pick him up in the car and drive olsowhere for the meeting. I attempted to change tho time of the meeting as well but. subjeot does •not olose hie store untll just before 2100 houra each day and feela that it would appear oda if he were to olose the storo at various timos of the evening on different days of the week. ils wife to not always in the store and be. would have to close the store in order to meet me. He oloses at 1400 hours on Sundays. I also instruoted him to change the speed of the recorder from 1 7/8ths to 3 3/iths. We have no recorders in the station that will take a large reel at 17/8the and this extremely slow spood is not necessary. 2 During early September Subject commented that there Is a new apartment building boing constructed on the corner of Gelati and Gereral de los Santos, across the atreet from the Sovlet Embassy. (This to our now basehouse). I took considerable notes on this as though I had never heard of the P- 8764 P=8764 COPIES MADE P-11712 --- ## Page 63 pince deforo and asked several questions about it. Ro said that the owner of the buflding.Is Sr. VILLAGRAN and that VILLAGRAN hag the reputation of being an anti-Communist and a loyal Noxican ostizen. He sald that the bullding would probably. be completed by Mars: 1946 and that 1t w11l have about alt floors. several Sovlets have mentioned to subject that they would like to rent apartments in the building sinoe. st ls so olose to the imbassy. 3. Subject said that ISAYBY had been In his store about the last week in September. (As far as I can tell this la ISAYEVg first visit to Subjectis-store.) ISAYEV made a: great many anti-U.s, remarks during his visle to the store and blamed the U.s. for most of the world's troubles. At one point he said that the Soviets made much better cars than the U.s. and that Sovlet cars were bullt llke "tanks". subject laughed at this remark because the thought crossed hls mind that only a soldier would like to drive a "tank" and from where Subject was standing at the time he could. вее the Sovietta" new fleet of American Fords and Chevys: I: I again asked Subject why the Soviets bad not been vlaiting his store in the evenings as they had in the past and he inslated. that it was because most of big "friends" at the Embassy lad returned to the Soviet Union beginning In July and their replacements had not warned up to him yet. --- ## Page 64 14-00000 site. I nokod him 18 a amall flosta might not help this situation and he sald that he thought that it might help. I toldi him tó make plans sor a flesta in honor of Mexican Independenco Day and to inülte an many of the new Sorseta as possible. He said that he would probably give the party on Fridsy, 17 September,. I suggosted that he Invite Turky ANDRIANOV (the GRU chauffeur) first and tell ANDRIANOV to Invite soveral of his friends. At the hext meeting with Subjeat he reported that NIKIFOROV, LOGTNOV and KORNUSHRIN were the only Sovlets who came to the fleste on the 17th. They arrived, had a fow drinks, danced t o some Russian recorda which they had brought with them and then left. (Ail are KGB types); They told subject that the other Sovlets could not attend because they had to attend a Crech Embassy reception that same evening. L I can find no record of such a reception either at the Czech on Polish Embaaales and there is no indication on the Soviet lines that they had anything planned for that evening. A soviet from Cuba arrived on the 17th but we have no idea how many sovlots were at the airport to greet him. I questioned Subjeet about the Soviets who. had appeared at the fiesta and he gave me a littlo information about them. They, visited his atore several times in the next few weeks and I showed him photographs of the men and expanded on his previous information. He had the following to say about them lhe has previoualy reported on NIKIFOROV). LOGINOV: Subject said that he belleves LOGINOV replaced --- ## Page 65 14-00009 NECHIPORENKO (correct), Subject calls him "the Bull" and deseribed him as being vulgar, crude, 11l mannered, ghort, tempered and a tyrant. He is A person who thinks that ho Is some sort öf a "big shot" and when he sits down he spreads ails lege and arms and takes up a space big enough; cor to mori... His Spanish la very bad and ho smokes "pleate" elgarettes. At the flesta LOGINOY told him that he was from the northern part of the Soviet Union, is married and has children. He claimed to have served in the Red Army. - KORNUSHK IN: Subject likes KORMUSHKIN who 1s friendly, well mannered and outgoing. He speaks good Spanish and told Subject that his wife likes Nexico.: Although KORMUSHKIN was wearing glassea in the photo show to Subjeot, he commented that be ofton sees KORNUSHRIN without hia glasses. He smokes "Record" elgarettes and Subject oalls him "El Jovencito". 5. Subject said that ISAYEV had dropped by his store during the week of 18 October and spent some time making fun of the King and Queen who were visiting Mexieo at the tines ISAYEV selt that the very existance or a king and Queen in 1965 was silly. He also claired that the Soviets had discovered the Comet that was then in the sly. (The Comet had actually been discovered by to Japanese and bears their names. He bragged about the great advances in the Soviet Union in all flelds and told Subject with great pride that the ruble was worth more than the dollar. He commented --- ## Page 66 that the U.s, was a waring nation while the Sovlet Union sought only poade and that the United States would ohange to something dimilar. to the Soviet oystem In the near future. 6o the reat of the meeting and the next tro, hero spent discussing Stanislav SILNIKOV and hia request that Subject. not as "flador" on an apartment for him as well as supply him with a a prostitute. (800 IMMA-27548. Of 4 Nov.) 7. In addition; Subject said that ANDRIANOV had asked bim to get Viktor KALININ some aphrodisiao pills.. ANDRIANOV paid that they were "for Viktor KALININ In Moscow" but subjeet thinks they are "for Yurly ANDRIANOV In Mexico" subject sald he hasn't the slightest Idea where to buy such a thing. 8. I told Subject to test the recorder by speaking into the microphones both in the upstairs room as well as in the main part of the store and then to play book the tape. Although RESCIGNO has explained the workings of the recorder to subjeot several times, he claimed that he did not know how to do this. I then Instructed him to disconnect the recorder and to deliver it to me at 2100 hours on Friday, 5 November. I sald that I would test the recorder myself. No asked why RESCIGNO could not come to the store and test It and I told him that RESCIENQ was away. Me then asked if RESCIONO Was a Mexican of an American. He said that RESCIGNO speaks Spanish like a Mexican and looks like a'Mexican but that ho (Subject) 19 sure that he was an American. I told him --- ## Page 67 14-00000 're data con licitiand no indian do to do items to iace that I really didn't know since I had never asked him. I ohanged the toplo. of conversation by saying that if be reported that SILNIKOV wanted a girl for this Sunday, I would reture the machine to him on Saturday, 6 November. "If not, he hould get it back at the next regular meoting which I would set on Friday wien I moet him. 18-0-1 let tone gettinte ..a... not the to .'. ";:: •*:, interes t... --- ## Page 68 14-00000 SECRET 2 November, 1965 MEMORANDUM FOR: .. FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. lionry & Johnson, Legal. Attache Winston M. Scott Travel of Soviot to Magatlan 1. This office has received a roport that Soviet Vice-Consul valentin Sergeyevich, LoGINOV planned to travol to Mazatlan from 26 to 28 October 1905 by plane. The purposo of tho trip was to take mail to of cod sips hech vad to for Lin Mazatian. The name This office would approciate any information: available to you concerning LOGINOV's trip. THIS INFORMATION, IS FRON A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE® IT MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY. • Distribution: Original - Addressee 50-2-4/A 9808: SECRET 68830 1 Essiolat 877 exterger tresesu.t812 --- ## Page 69 1o 1h9 C.0. ronunod aoqualntancoship with Subjoot, and in the insediato and olzablo väour loft by. Gerald F, Contotnor's doparturo, tried to establish a sriondly rapport with Subjoot. For this rosson the C.O. gave Subjeot a more "Erlandly nano to know him by, lo1 bergor it being explained to subjoot that Dol was the C.O.'8 trüe firat name. Subjeos thenht the cholon of targer i mid, bonnino he heros norrral jeslo of lot 8am Mia. Do menodis allo geo sologlunds in, and asking for Monicy. P-7442 2o. Subject roparted that ho had cone baok to loileo sion a trip on 10 autuat l ula Nochiporenko was at the airport to greet his. Nochiporonko had vialted his offico proviously, and brousht along his roplacement "Valontin", and at that timo had fourd out when Subjeot was expocted back. Nochiporenko was invited by Subjeot to visit him at hid homa for broakfast on il lugiat. Ha showed up wiel the soviet tabasey, or in any othor way try to reach Sache. Subjoot had e souvoris platol which ho had obtainod fron sono Caulolter (preaumably during WIII), and Nechiporenso asked if ho might have it. Subjoot save 1t to hm. Nechi porenko evidently arked Subjoot to arrange for a oño day trip to Paria for hin while he was en route to the suetet Union from his stopover, Fussels. (Subjeot complied, and notifled hia agent abrond.. Subject received a wire a Low dayo ago that lachiporanio mas "no show" in Patle), Nachiporenko was not. Interosted in Subjoot's observations of U.S. attitudes toward the Viet Naw and Dominican altuations, although Subject had boen asked to note such attitudes that Catalana foresi wao han worked previously in Sablect's office, who ned (321) attended the Maccan Soviet Cultural Institute, who had da boy friend the trerican who was Elving daglich lessons to leantporenko (Garyodgoa ang, and who hai married sone loxloan and was now in Acapuloo with her husband. (works at has Brisas) would be able to contaot lechiporenko by mail to the Soviet Embasay in Mexico. 3a Subject is to call in when he is contaoted dy Sasha, His lino'to the Sovs about the travel arency in New York will be that he binn't the time to select complily intif contest. Ju P-1171.2 --- ## Page 70 the rangeer or somplete the study of the offico'e roquirosente, but that do 1e budois coine to hava it done. On hia parsonal affaire, sibfoct said ho mas 80116:40 nove in Decender to the Lomas, so a cordominium apartiento. Attention "Paul"? PRA the G.O. would approciato knosing any collatoral info about Neokiporenko's doparturo, the idontity of "Valentin", and a triof pracia of Subject's Pornor associationa with ilichodso. nat cotle in Late Losining parsing Twiel Ree Hechen even thie Epilton tues Catalina Tori, polis --- ## Page 71 MANSOL. VAF --- ## Page 72 STUJECT OF DOCUMENT. SUBJECT: Ernesto Canuano del. VECEsTO and Mario Mante forte Toledo LIENVOY Take Mil11e godricuee 12. CROSS #CARASO TO THIS PILE SECRET 1 Rope Foliot 899 DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFER-NEE DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATICE AI FILE NO. 201 058 DISPATCH OR SOURCE DOC. S+H804 40. F:1 30432 B. SOURCE. CRYPTONYM LTENTVOY 10- OISSEMINATED IN DATE OF INFO. 18-27 Oet 561 P'::DATE DATE PROCKSSES 25 NOw 1066 DOCUMENT DISPOSITION 1D. TRANSFERRED. TO RA FILE NO. PERTINENT ISFORMATION 248 #- DATE I. Nov 66 •EVALUATION • LOGINOV, Valentin Sergeyerich (201-285412) DE. ALIASO MARTINE NEVAREE (a suatecalan) calls Soviet Concul IDitoV to Invited him to a cocktail party to be him at Nartinez' hori. Vertiner hes Invited some inf tie. Russian sthletes participating in some r? the ine- olymple sames and wishes Logiray to attend also; as well as she, Ambessader.. (all the Info found on logirion in thie icement) FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO. fele J01siona 1201 285 117 SECRET 48• 488 --- ## Page 73 DISPATCH CLASSIFICATION. 8. PROCISSING ACTION MARIO FOR INDEXING Chtes, SB Divielon INFO CaleR, WH Division CAR FUDGE INDOXINE FRONA Chief of statior, Mesico City MICROFIL SUBJECT REDTOP/LCIMPROVE - Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV (201-120123) ACTION REQUIRED • REFERENCES. I LiTKArO reported the return of subject hts wife and daughter Nins has renained in the USSR.) Subject and hlis wife wore still trivelling on the same passports used when they left Mexico in August 1966 (copies have been foriarded to Headquarters) and Subject is still listed as Second Secretary An his paasport. The ohly addition to the passports 1e& Mexican entry visa valld for sixty daye lesued on 30 August 1966 in Moscow. Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412) has been reported telling Lic0z7-5, LICol and LICANNY»I that he la now the Consul Goneral, replacing Subject - when LICOLY-5 asked LOGINOV what he ma then going to do with Subject, LOGINOV said that it was not his decision, but that subject would probably. bo put In charge of some dopartment in the Embassy.as First Secretary. The Station will keep Headquarters advised of any Indications of the nature of subject'a prosent duties and status within the KGB hierarchy. 3. During Subjectle absence on home leave, LILYRIC reported that suspect KGB chauffeur Vasilly Stepanovich MIROSINIKOY (201-273046) was been driving Subject's car a fow times. : LICOUl also reported that MIROSHNIKOV was driving • car with diplonntie plates 26 DA, which is Subjoct's car: Distribution: CSB 1 - CWH CROSS REFERENCE TO for/Millard C. CURTIS ES COPY FILED: IN 201-120123 Exched. 201-285412 LASPATON SYMBOL, AND NUMBER DATE HUMA • 30213 CLASSIFICATION S BC R 5 OCTOBER HOS FILE NUMBER 201-120123 1966 --- ## Page 74 FBI. DOCUMENT DATE: • 20 SEPTENGER 1966: CLASSIFICATION: SECRET SUSJECT :: UNKNONN SUBJECTS; 10S BLUE FORD FAIRLANE, / UTAN. LICENSE 'AR 1966: AT SOVIET ENRASSY, NEVICO CITY, NAS 30, 66: FAt FILE NO: NONE GIVEN (SALT LAKE CITY) --- ## Page 75 SECRET on 80) DOCUMEMT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE TO. DATE Da!& Proce DOLMENT DÍSPOSITION TOANB+EHHED:10 PLATINENT INESAMALISN ECGINUV, 201-295412 •SEX M:CO8.7 VALENTIA SENGAYIVICH 208-01947? МанА діОгО! OCC 7. 201-7734220.CAK SEEN CHIVING YA•'ONALISSYNS duL FILE IN 201-2 837-12 •FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO. 867 SECRET --- ## Page 76 SECRET IrS. MUELLER recently Inherited some money from an uncle, VARROS sald, and this is one of her ways of spending some of It. 8:. MUELLER's daughter Is.studying (third year of college) In Vienna. She is majoring In Russian language and Russian history there, That. Is where the "great" Interest" In Russia comes from, VARROS sald. This daughter hopes to teach when" she finishes school: KMBARK ON: • Distributlong Origi Charles: G. MUELLER P- Valentin LOGUINOV PR 50-2-4/E ECRET. --- ## Page 77 6 Japuary 1946 NEMOSANDIM FOR TiE RECORD: FROM: Oronsky SUBJECT: LICANNY-I (P-8415) 1. Subject 1s an official of Tours which 1s a representative for Inturist in Mexloo Clty. We have had no contact with him since e July 1964. At one time he had given the Station reports on various soviet tourists and had been recruited prior to a trip to the Soviet Union in connection with Inturist. During the past few months he has been giving Don Lautz reports on various Soviet tourists such as the Soviet Orchestra which visited Mexico and Cuba recently. Lautz passed these reports-on to me and Cynthia sent them home. subject sees bautz once or twice a week In connection with visa matters. He told Lautz that he had been contacted by KUBARK sore jears ago büt that due to eno pressure of his buatness he did not have one ta write reports or to act as some sort of Double Agent. He said he was willing to pass along Information on Soviet tourists but did not wish to become an agent for both the Americans and the Soviets. About & weok sago Lautz told me that subject bad poported that valenten Loanor, Vice-Consit at the Soviet Embassy, ad asked Subject to supply him with information on boats and trains between Mexico and lew York. Subject winted to know what he should do. I asked Lautz 1r Subject wanted to talk to me and Don said. that he did. I then arranged to meet him in Lautz's'office at 1430 hours 6 January. IP-885 P.11712 NUTILO MAUL JP.8415 P-11712 --- ## Page 78 2 = He is well dressed and speaks native American English. I naked him about his contacts with the Sovlets and he sald that he had not had any extended contact with the Soviets for some time. During. August I9kS he was arnroached by rApskov whom he knows as the Sovlet Consul and was asked passenger by him to prepare a chart of all commercial/ships operating between Veracrus and New York City. "for the month of September". He also wanted the costs of travel and baggage. Subject has not given this report to YATSOV, (A copy 1s attached. ) During December he met LOGINOV for the first time. at the airport while Subject was attending to the Soviet Orchestra. LOGINov did not know subject and was very cool toward him. until YATSKOV came by and greeted Subject warmly. LOGINOV then beenme very friendly and asked subject's hame. LoGINOV subsequently visited Subjectle place of bustness and told him that he was the replacement for oles NSCHIPORENiO (KGB Officer) and that Oleg an had sent regards to subject. He said that he hoped that he and subject would be as frlendly aa subject had been with oles. (subject commented that he had not been especially friendly with NECHIPORENKO,) Subject sald that LOGTNOV's Spanish is almost native and that he (Subject) was shocked to learn that he was a Soviet. LOGINOV referred to YAISKOVis request and added that he also wanted Subject to include rail travel in the chart and ba was especially interested in the cost of "excess baggage" by rail. He also wanted to Include sea travel from Veracruz to Europe. --- ## Page 79 3: Sübject sald that he did not want to become a Did but that he would be willing to supply seir whatever Information he could concerning the Sovlots he dealt with and the soviet tourtsts. I aoked Is ho would be willing to surely personality data on LoGINOy inoluding LoGINov'a background, education, family ote. He sald that he would be glad to do this. He said that he would not be able to meet me on street corners or in restaurants and preferred. to talk to me after he had finished his business with Don Tautz.. I Instructed him not to discuss his relationship with me with Don Lautz or with anyone else for that matter. antxthat He said that he would call LOGINOV and arrange to five him the report and perhaps have lunch with him. 4. Subject wiil never be anything exceptional in the Way of an Access agent but I have asked Headquarters to renew his POA. --- ## Page 80 Thru CONT IDENTIAL Ne. Boone tra Mintator Corolor Jays: C/VIB A. Cortoelno, C.C. January 6, 1966: LICANNY-I A reproventativeof rollable Information In the paot called on me soday to rapert that Nr, Logulner of the Soviet Embassy has requeated hía agency to pro vide data on train schedulea fren Moxice to New York Cliy and best - schedules fren New York City to Burope. The Sevists vere particularly Interoutod In the traln boggage allomance and the cost fer escaos baggage, he aald. Logulnov do a raplocement for Olog Neciperenico she mo: recently transferred fren the Sovier Babasay in Manico City. My: Infornant-d0-.- ecribed him an tall; blond, bluaeyed, about thirty geare of ago, and ao a person no apeake fluent Spartah without any decont. ce: P/2 P-11712 CONVIDENTZAI --- ## Page 81 notes 25. NoV KADIDDLE might have been at Perla'& Thanksgiving party. I know PRIKHODKO and KONSTANTINOV were Invited, possibly KUCHE ROV but. I can't find the names of the others. The description of the tall brunette sounds like LOGINOŸ. The other one sounds ilke PRIKHODKO: I wiil get out photos to show DIDDLE. P-11420 * anger p- 5237 29 Dec 1965 --- ## Page 82 de t the fire i Possed-l Thank Tris Contaos Reports Noting botreon Elgobrook and jadídulo, 28 Debomber cOs On 28 Dooombor I onllod on Kadiadlo at his realdenoo, primarily for tho purpodo of petting up an olomontary codo ayato vitaliar, and to arrivo at salary arrangonnato with him.. Salary vas Sirod at 150 por month, (olightly above what doors had puggested) and plus 6100 alloavance during the duration of bie tour hore as Ambassador. As heid previouely. roquoutod, I roturned to hia blo rooolpt for 35,000 poads, valob ho inatantly burnt in an ashtras, with obvious rollor. Ho commontod tast he hopod ho would never hava. to sign anothor, and 1t is oloar that there may be some oblon in vorking out a pold aokorlodgowonte I will loave 1t foX latory wiit cortity the i Jan vaymontand ticy it on the following month. I askod han do ho had boon having problomo with hae poncoioned about taking money Fion the norloans, and he rophlod that he lead not been ablo to loop the... night after our firat paymont, but aftor talking the whole matter over with hio vito (the strongor porsonality of the tro) ho bad finally rosolved it In bió minde friende bad to help one anothor, and 1f soceptod the Anerione aa miah - malot has alaya done - he should not be too proud to let too bail him out of a tight pot, "They were soing to turn off the cleatriolty, and there was only a thousand peson left in our bank abount" His conno, we agroad. to call in bla wife and consult together.. She was nore than sensible about holping, copognited both the uses and dangers of the telephono, and nado sono usoful suggestions, Porsonal contaot, - .. banod on social rolationship, in the bario arrangement) either at'hle house of mino.; Tolophone cortaot to bo only betwoen his wife and mine, It of ther of the two women oall and suggest seeing one anothor at any hous botwoon five and 17g '1t means that oithor I an to oall on hiddle at that koer or ho on no, depending on the contest of the convereation. Any othor hour mentioned aignifion pooial contaot botwoon the vomon themsolvos, who are, of course, available to pass written messagon. Baorgenoy contaot 9.2770 --- ## Page 83 can do mado by Diddlo himsell, oalling only froa @ pu tolophono, novor fron bla houso or pit100. In rogard'to CE affaira, Diddle made tro comonts whioh ho ouggonted I might want to. Ago up wita Enobye Ho sokod us If I had not or talked with Noel LIndal, at (vico Prosidont of Grant Advortlaing s A) at the dinnor hassa Diadlo rayo Chrlotues nicht, and on louring that'i had, he commentod that lindeayo oultivation of hii had boon to anaiduous that ho was beginning to wonder 18 ho was not dooling vith condono who meht bo visualting hirvels no bla futuro brition bado offloor. Thore was nonething about lindear, ho malde : that node him fool that ho way anuonsing Diddlo quito oarofullye lio aakod 1s no oould run'a file ohoos on Lindosy himsolf and on Grant idvortloing. I patd I would shook. Poarl Conzalo% has boon purouing hin much too cotivoly, ahking him to hór house out of turn, ranting to do a procilo on hin for tho Inclion languago lova, of whioh tho 1s the soolety editor. Wat a portoot: over for soguiring blo data, ho oxplainod, and what odd friondo no had for an Morion, (aho 1o llated an a US natlonal in the inglo inorioan dir- potory, and 18, acoording to Didald, olther neparatod or divorood from d Moxloan huaband) newupaper wonan or note One evoning a month or so a80 ho had gone to dinner at her louse, found mout of the other suouts ajod on that thoir way rather uncorotoniously; and was loft with only Mru Gonsalo% and to non, whop, he found to his surpriso, vexo both Ruselane (namen not rocalled, and nover very olearly given during the initial flurry of intro duotions) • These two ongagod him in serious conversations Ruentanas How do you fool about Communion? --- Diddler There is sonothing to bo said for miny 18 not o11 the important systems undor which various oountrius are governed, hovever ny primary conoorna lu not vita Communion in the abstraot, but with the bout way for thana, to be sovorned. No munt take the boat of all, and flo whom to our country. --- ## Page 84 14-00000 Rusaland: 7o, no, the quention do wbat do you think corsonally about Commundan? What are your omn D9110re? Diddior (getting shulad ub at tate palat) Tolbertly, I quet do desoribod as a nationallat.. LOGINOV aged about 38. ono os the useland was very tall, brunette, wayy thia bedrenot obvloualy Rubalan in appearanco, very good-looks. The PRiKHODKO other was aiddle boight, doop linos running from the corners of his none vortivally down his obooke, not so handeone, ago about 42. Diddlo led not. êcan then sinoo, al though he has kopt an eye out for thom; cursing hlazolf for not having their names.. Convorastion in Englaih - whioh is scout al Diddle has, othor than Fand and sone German. He boldoves he would do ablo to. Identity them from photographe. Dladlo'e point in reviewing this in tae not to not ne know that there were Russians looking him over-re both well avare 1of that - but to point up Mre Gonnalos'o rolo so a spotter. He does not think that sho could have boon unitting of the role she was pleyles, and has avoided her singe. Regarding indreyev, he sussented that I oultivate him, and on being told that I plans a dinner on 8 Jan (to whloh Diddle Invited) for about 18 people, he carmented that it would be an excellont opportunity to nice aal andreyer as irell: Doubtful, of sourse, that he would aocopt, but no opportunity to continue hle exposure to un should be overlooked. de made the usual comments conderning Adrejer's difforences. Don his colleagues,. nadins only that A bad told hin that he was basloally intornationallet: Inousloake As otharo, ho sondes sorothing wrong In d's relationello vita hia vife. (Comments. I diat do not, as yet. She did not appoar conrortable did not Ilke: trist, trug & cotora, but they soomed to be on good annugle tores. Fo vas pushing hor join in, but not impatiently) ... Didalo ancod for EDI'a on the tel-continental congronay a number of: Ghanians will be transiting hostoo on their. vav_to and from lavanay. ho.... Baba poolfoady mentioned Donortonoo, Yoon do dogoridod as an anti- --- ## Page 85 alice ¡crunal Ghandan onployod an a o1ril/ corvant do the UN, and not montono do Hould have expoojad to bo nerod as a dolosate to the conforondo, and Joan sottogal, whom he cald vao a "orypto donorat" at agart, and not tho anti-. vostorner ho la uoually donoribod as boins.. What Tottosch wood to bo, and what ho rolly in at tho promont tino aro two quito differont thingo. He than booome a friönd, nave ki-b, although ho cannot appoor me su. "I told him that Rattesoy would be coming on tho sixth, nore or 1008, and that I vould got bla a 11ot of roguiromonte for the Conforenoo White Dillon 91206i P- 11070: 9 --- ## Page 86 1d-0d0d SECRET .. Date: December 21, 1965 To: Mr. Winston M. Scott N. L. Ferris Legal Attache Subject: TRAVEL OF SOVIETS TO MAZATLAN 105-4900 (12/21/65) This document is for tho de ef your sirne caly and neither it nor. its crients should he fucker distributed -withat appropriate auchorization. Reference is made to your memorandum dated November, 5, 1965; your #9833, and my memorandum dated November 24, 1965. A reliable source stated that Vice Consul VALENTIN S LOGINOV, Third Secretary of the Russtan Embassy, had been at Mazatian, Sinaloa, Mexico, bring mail to the Russian ship ISKATEL and had left Mazatlan On December 8; 2965, on CHA jet flight #911 at 3:45 PY ,m., en route to Mexico, D.F. This same source stated that the above person visit a Russian ship, belleved to have been the VENUSHTYELNYI, in November, 1965 SECRET. Group Excluded from Automatic Downgrading and Declassification --- ## Page 87 CONEIDENTIAL Dalo: .To: From: Subject: core: 21, 190 So Winston di. Scott V. I. Forris Lobal Attache Russian Ship ISKITEL 105-1970 (12/21/65) Ha. A confidential source at Mization, sil Mexico, advised that the Russinn Kl0i, Ship ISKATEL arrived laxatlan on Decorber 3, 1953 and Deceibei 9, 1905. dopajeed.on This ship was. listed as being a scichtific motur ship and carried i crow od 32. Thie abore source made available a copy o1 thie cicw list of this vessol, which is enclosea. A socond confidential sourco at lazatlan stated that Vice. Consul VALENTIN S- LOGINOV, Third sociotary of the Russian Enbassy: had boon at inzation to bring mail to this ship and ind left Mazatlan on Decenbor. S, 1955, on CIA jet flight FOll at 3:15 p.m., en route to lexico; Enclosure її CONFIDEITIAL GrOUD. I Excluded from Automatic Dongriding and Declassification --- ## Page 88 1d-0d0d 1l February 1056 &STORANDUS FOR THE RECORD: PACK:. Oronsky SUBJECT: LICONL-} ..!- 1. I met Subject on Friday, 11 February at 1900 hours. The meeting hag a very short one since I only wanted to determine Ir he had found a giri for SILNIKOV to "paint" sald was still looking. 2. The boy who watches Subject's store at night did not up on 7 February, and Subject was forced to sleep above the store himself. waS At 0300 hours on Tuesday (8 February) he: awakened by the noise of a car horn and looked fron the window to see Valentin'S. LOGINOV and Vladislav S. KORMUSHKIN -blowin the horn of their car in the driveway of the Embassy. Both Sovlet's were drunk and were yelling for the gato guard (bino naprened to be SILlIKOV) over the rate for them. They were driving car 337-D (LEONOV?s) or. 336-D (KORNUSHKIN'S). Subject returned to his bed and-did not see them leave the Embassy. 3. Since both LOGINOV and KORMUSSKIN live in apartments outside. the Embassy and since they sould not willingly go to the Embassy at 3 a.m. while drunk, It is likely that they were working when they got drunk and therefore had no fear of being reprimanded-for ite They risy. have returned to the Embassy to make a report or to secure some classified materials before going home. Both men redlaced known KGB officers and both work under Pavel YATSKOV. 4. I set our next meeting 24 February.. COPIES MADE P.1112 --- ## Page 89 14-00000 LIMITED, 7 Feb 1966 Man driving black Opel with plates 22-82-62 of DF was at Soviet Embassy 1707-1740 hours thits date. LOGINOV saw him to the gate. (re vIsa???) cur ) Placa Ne. 22-82-62-Expediente Nº M/552/421521-0p01-170394385-Sedan mo= delo 1962 dado de alta en Marzo 10 de 1965 a nombre de CELIA BAYARDI TORRES con domicilio en las calles de Arquitectos Nº 46 de la colonia Escandón en Tacubaya D. P. 211712 --- ## Page 90 14-00009 SECRET 3 February 1966 MENORANDUN FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nathan L. ferris, Legal Attache Winston M. Scort Travel of Soviet This office has received a report that the 1°y1eo-Consul in Mexico City, Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV, planned to fly to Mazatlan Sinaloa on 1 February 1900 and renain there until s February 1900 in ordor to attend to the Sovict ship Unushitelyy," which was scheduled to dock in Mazatlan at 0800 hours on 2 February. 1966 Any inforastion avallable to you on LOCiNOV's trip would be appreciated. THIS INFORNATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SCURCE. MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY: 10097 Distribution: Original - Addressee =50-2-12A P- 11712-л SECRET AP --- ## Page 91 howe peil ro 27 Jan 1965 MEMO FOR RECORD • FROM: Marvin A. Cibor. SUBJECT: Sov let Attendance at PRI Lecture 71, 1. On the evening of 26 Jan 1966 the following Soviet Embussy officers were identified as artending se a lecture glven by. Prof. Jose VAZQUEZ Amaral on the subject of "Tire Éxperlencos of a Mexican Professor In a Unlversity ln the United State.i*; Svyatoslav Fedorovich KUZNitSOV and Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV. KUZNETSOV was seated on the dals behind the principal speaker. LOGINOV was seated in the year portion of the audience. There were six U,S. Emussy officers present. P- - 11712 p-8102 -11712 --- ## Page 92 14-000 SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD FROM COS SUBJECT Valentin LOGUINOV: 21 January. 1960-1 vile Dila сурк recuriche 2. VARROS sald he would, unless we asked the contrarys Tell Cristobal TORRES Ponce not to show up for the meeting.on 24 January with LOGUiNoV. ASk TORRES Ponce to report any and all subsequent approaches. ите). th -Distributions Orig w/atti 1. w/0.8. On base lies contat safely Cist Libinos Valentin LOGUINOV P- walipis W. SECRET --- ## Page 93 TO STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum TO •Roglonal Security Officer DATE: JanuATy 21, 1766 FROM :: Frinelsoo Ding Gomer Seourity Assistant aujieT: Criatobal TORRES Ponce - Enbassy. Chauffew Xesterday noon Is. TORRes came up to my offiod and roported that -ho was sent to the Russian Embassy In ordor to Dick up ldes. MuELLER's passport and that he was approached by Valentin'S. LoGulNoV, 3rd, Socrotary, who asked him 1f he would like to go to Russle and that if ho would like to rocolve. Rossian magazines and that if the U.S. Embassy uses to send comebody to follow its enployees when they go some place in coin and that this individual finally invited tr. TORRES to have supper with him next Monday, January 244, 2966, and that they will neot one oach other at the corner Insurgentes Sur with Baja Calfornia, undor big advertisenent "CANADA", at 1830 hourg. Mr. TORRES also commontod that this Indiridual told hin that in order to got a Visa for Russia, takos timo, bocauso thoy haro to call Russia In order. to get suthorization, sane proçoss the U.3.. Embasay does when the Russian. Elbassy roquento a Vles for one of the mmbere of Ita Staffo Buy U.S. Savings Bords Regulaily on the Payroll Savings Plan --- ## Page 94 ... i: Valentin V. Zozieince ..... ; : ." taalondoet air.onmnn --- ## Page 95 Imagitas y baga colo torre. 6 % fus = --- ## Page 96 SEGRET MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD FROM 17 January 1966 KUBARK ONLY SUBJECT 3 Charles G. MUELLER, U.S: Embassy (Economies Section) Officer Reference Is made to LIENVOY (three conversatlons soviet Embassy officer. U.S. Embassy) wich Sovlets concerning a proposed visit by Subject's wife and daughter to the USSR. Paul Dillon and / advised Minister Boonstra (who was Acting Charge) on 14 January 1966 of this proposed visit and.of the conversatlons we had learned about. Mr. Boonstra had not prevlously heard of this proposed visit of Mrs. MUELLER to the USSR.: He sald he would (without divulging CAS as the source) look Into this.. Later on 14 January 1966, Mr. George VARROS told the proposed trip. • He sald the Ambassador had personally approved: It (Mr. Boonstra later also confirmed this) VARROS also said he thought It "not good" for About anyti only eye, ay the one about. o He sald (Confidentially) example, she told at a party (when she was practically "Blotto!) about MUELLER's"taking pletures all over Mexico for CIA!" {defia Vanes he prong i be travelling on MUELLER a pre-briefing; She will (and VARROS thinks Is wrong) be travelling on a diplomatle passport. SECRET 11712 --- ## Page 97 1d-0d0 SECKI T - 1.98 07. •DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE • нак то. 0. Orpio 090000069 • Deto no sino. O 909188 COCUNENT OISPOSITION 01 #0. LOGINOV VALENTINE S- 2012054122 SEX M DOB Y CAT OCC 3AD SEÇY• VIGE CONSULA 050-008-010 MMMA -20372 124 1t8 60 AOL PL. R 6603082384 FILE IN 20T-2554/2 PILE THOS PORM IN PIGE NO. +°# 087 +00 08600098 808000800 SECRET 201-085412 --- ## Page 98 SILNIKOV arrived about 1330 hrs and had a drlok of tequila. a hiph levol Soviet came Into the shop and after he had left Is studying Spanish in the Embassy. (This followed Subject's corment to SILNIKOV that the Sovlet spoke very good Spanish). - SILNIKOV said that eaoh Wednesday all the Sovlets must speak Spanish and those who refuse to do this must pay a fine. crNIXOV sa1d -that With the fine money they: buy more Spanish: booklets and records. there are some Sovlets who simply refuse to learn Spanish or Mexican customs and that these people will probably not be sent abroad again. Commented that this would be a shame sinoe Mexico han such excellent beaches, weather and everything is so Inexpensive here.. He left the shop about 1430 hrs. Subject was about to olose his shop at 2100 hrg when Valentin S • LOGINOV came into the store. He asked If he could use Subject's phone and ther made a long distance call to Cuernavaca and spoke to someone 1n Spanisb® Subject could not heer what was being sald but got the phone number - Cuernavaca 2-30-55* (I told Subject to bring ne the phone bill when It arrivea so that I can double number- check the Sauces Licowe-r Contect reput 12 Agil 66 P-11,712 --- ## Page 99 14-000 SECRET 25 March 1966. CONTACT REPORT SUBJECT: 1. Subject called me on 23 March to report that he had learned a little which might interest me No made an appolntment to meet in his office at 1700 tho same day. The meeting lasted for 20 minutes. 2i. : Subject stated that at 1200 hours on Sunday, 20 March LOGINOV came to the French Club. • He was accompanied by his wife whose salient features were, redish hair which. could be died and very generous proportions, "a typically stout Russian woman. Theye was also another Soviet couple wich them. The man was described as vory blond as tall as LocINov (cars boyish haircut with a part, not quite with a solid muscular build, like a weight lifter. • His apparent age was. 25 to 35: His wi-fo was dark haired, normal figure and also young. The two couplos had three children with them all in the fo bracket. Subject did: not remember their sexes sinco he was concentrating on the adults. (COMMENT: I first thought that the second Soviet would be KORMUSHKIN but. Subject insisted that he did not wear glasses (KORMUSHKIN always wears glasses). GORLITSYN Subject's description fits and wife perfectly. However, will take platures to the next. meeting for. conflimation, Subject stated that upon arrival the two men went into the locker. room and emerged In shorts. The women were alrcady dressed in shorts. "They had their own badminton rackets. and repaired to a side lawn where they played badminton until Subject at 1330; During the period 1200 to 1330 they did not contact anybody but simply played badminton among themselves. lot noting the mayin subted Picted Locitoves car in the parking license plates: Subject was apologetic about the paucity of his information but I encouraged him and told him it was a fine said that he had briefed his wife on LÖGINOV and she Subject she will be.on the lookout for him during the week. Subject appeared to be very much interested in pursuing this subject for me and gave every indication that he will keep working on it. Paul Dillon File: p- 12330. Ф-11712 P-11163 SECRET --- ## Page 100 SECRET 22 March 1966 MIMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nachan L. Ferris; Logal AEtache Winsion N. Scott Soviet Intolligence Services 65-465 1. Referonce 1s made to previous correspondence concerning the captioned subfoct. A sensitive and rollable source advised that on Tuesday, 1 March 1960 an unidentifled young girl who appeared to be an American visitod the Soviet lubassy in Mexico City fron 1202 - 10:1218 hours. source advised that the girl spoke to Sryatosláv Fodorovich NUINETSOV, First- Socrotary of the labassy and vith Valentin Sergeyevich Lucinov, Third. Socretary and Vice Consul of the Labassy. ; Both are KGB officers. While talking to those two Sortets she was seen to write something in a notebook whici she carriod inside a folder. Attachod is a photograph of this sirl. THIS INFORMATION IS FRON A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE: IT MUST NOT BE DISSEMINNTED IN WOLL OR IN FART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE. IN MEXICO CITY. 4 10263 Attachment:: Photo Distribution: Orignal - Addressee • t/att. 50-2-4/A. w/att" • 50-8-10/11, w/att; P- 8102, W/o atz. 210/0: 810 Meno Chron SECRET declateli/catica --- ## Page 101 10 d'arch 1966 it ninet 111 biar 1930, Diad's orfie Runs reporerd that on 16 l'ir he ano called at his office hy Valentin Lorinor, atio ond ho flat munted to have lunch eith subj and talk, lordney ernirt in not ind luncheon for 17 inr, mit sin; decurred and the noot uns ont for 10 lar. Mud rent to the lason la borde irataurent on Hollvar Callo (ineidentally, Lonnov jaid tic check, being more prone to take the tab than his piedecensor Alokonndr Trikhodko). They talked for two hours, most of that time taken up by lonnoy in a revien of the world ritation for subd. locinor Intinated to Suhy thint he wanted Suig to be au courant and In the know on political eventes. Ho apoke of the Sino Soried aplit,. entioning the widely known reasons for the split but correnting specifically. from the Soviet vienroint on the Chinese hero-worship of lao toe fun; sile implodyencoo and hollrorency. of China ca compared "ith the Soviet Unionin inculne policy of decking peace. ie mentioned that China had had. a break in the ant two sourg ly hovin; abundont harvents. He said that hardly a Communiat Party In the world non aupport Hod China, nentioning apecifically on those that do the Mccralion, dew brolond and Vint dan'prties. He concitod ot lenith on the Indonesion situation, blaming the Cilnese for having reduced commintot strength in that country. He snid that a hundred thnusand ra Communtata, in Indononto hod bren illed since lagt October. In like voin he comented odversely nibinst the Chinese in the recent overthrow cia of lictuma in Ganna® ile apoke of the upcoming Coniress of the CPSU at uhich he said would he COPI that thrushcher had done many good things for his country but that he was a mon who relied too wich on his collible judsment. He comented about France. He said nothing about the U.S. /Comments The C.O. asked Subj to prepare a precis on the topica covered and the main soints that Loginov nade about them. 2. Ro operational mattere losinov asked Subj if he had prepared the anorers about the personalitios in the foredon office and the Resiatro Civil, Subj sald he hadn't, and losinoy asked him to have then ready for their next meet. cy. to P- 11112 CARDED P-2112 117/2 --- ## Page 102 14-00000 1229 Suhy told Leinor ajnut an speomina trip to Copenharen, which he la to undertore in behnlf of the chief of lexican Teurion, mustin solvat (oco astuched leterr). Locinor asked Subj, 1f he vere in Paris, to 100k up Ginnita Polner Tortur, nico pi do trition 1a70 official. Subf said ho "Time mure of beir in Parin, but ho would. try to see her ar he noco thero. Mosento Suil plans to leave l'exico on 23 liar, travol to Brusele and insterdan, ve in Gownhnich for the Concreas on Concress caniantions • from 30 lor to? 455• continue on lucinces to Vienna and Parto, Thero lo no set date for hio retum/. Loinov Inuired If any of the employes of subj's offico snoke Enrich, indentin, that if they did they micht be able to min employment at the i.s: saunay in lexioo. subd volinteered nor ready inferration to lonnoy shout his shie enj.lrigoos. borinov said he would call Subj for their next neot. 3 The 0.0. told Subj to primro a superficinl peracnality resume on the persons wanted ly lostrov (thiu for prior jubmiosion to the Station). Alno, while in Turia, at it le not too much trouble, try to see Giretta Palaces-for thó purpoo ni having some little to report to losinoy (naturilly mre-checked by the Station) and aloo for the Station's benorit to discem if the Scriote abrond hnd made any överturen to her. 40: Subj parentheticolly remarked to the C.0., in a loosely defined manner of howing the ectivity of the Israell Embasay in koxico, that there nao to he a Congress it Intellcotuals in Mexico with about fift porticipante from ali over latin merico. The mafor theme of the Congress was to be The Situation of the Jews and Anth-Semitiem in the soviet Union, but the theme was being held under cover as far as all advance fublicity was concerned. (Attached in the anncuncement card for the Conrass) Subj'e fira is handling the arrancerents. So The CO, vill contact subj on 22 ver prior to his departure abroode to the C.0. CARDIO sidenduns Subj renarked/after his long talk with losinoy that he regarded Lo: Inov as a better intelligence official than Prikhodko, much nore savvy, and that he must have been in the intelligence cane longer than frikhodko.. Subj sinid. that locinor had told him that he mould show subf pictures of the places ne hod been in Lotin Arerica. COPIES MADE --- ## Page 103 SECRET 16 March 1966 MENORANDUM FOR THE RECORD CONTACT REPORT SUBJECT: l. Unon receipt of POA on Subject, I called him at his. office on 1l March 1965 and made an appointment to see him at 1300 on 14 Narch at the office. I had met him socially in the fall of 1965, he remembered me which facilitated the contact: I met with him from 1800 to 1835 at his öffice. He took ime to a back office where we conducted the conversation. stated my business. briefly that. I knew LOGINOV was a member of the French Club and' I desired information about his activitles: He was in immediate ngreement to help me in any way he could. and contacts at the cluby have him LoGInoV's full name, physical description, type and license plate of his car and showed him pictures.of LOGINOV and his wife. Subject said that he had not seen LOGINOV at the club nor heard his name: He is sure that LOGINOV. is not a tennis player which is Subject's only occupation at the club. Subject said the only goes there on Saturday afternoons and Sunday Thences with the children swore a red eate othering the children."Subject agreed that both he and his wife would look out for LOGINOV.: At my suggestion he agreed to make inquiries about LOGINOV from Club employees such as: the manager or the 'bar tender who know everybody. He agreed to mask his interest by stating only he had heard that à Russian was a member and to express normal curiosity about this unusual Subject immediately agreed to my request that this subject be a matter of strictest confidence between himself, his wife and me (his wifo is: an American citizen whom. I have met and on whom we also have a FOA).. As I was leaving and thanking hin for his cooperation, he expressed his appreciation in the confidence that l'had in him in a matter of this nature. Towards the end of the conversation he asked if i worked with ät the Embassy. I said hin." but I know He answered, "of course, you would be with counter- SECRET P-12330 P-11717 --- ## Page 104 SECRET intelligence and he is in political norh." " agreed wich He did not appear to this. Other than his telling me that I nort in counter-intelligence, he did not ask any questions about my position in the Embassy. Subject made a very good impression; direct, businessilke and no nonsense. He said that he would call me in tow or three weeks to advise the results of his investigation. Paul Dillon SECRET --- ## Page 105 14-00000 Pili mat (2 See be? Date: To: From N I Ferris Legal Attacho Subject: SOVIET SHIPS VISITING MEXICAN PORTS 1105-5156 (3/7/66) Reference is made to your memorandum entitled "Travel of Soviets," dated February 3, 1966; your number 10097. Enclosed herewith .for reference are copies of the crew list of the Soviet "Vnushttelnyi." À source, who has furnished reliable information in the past, advised that the above ship arrived in the harbor at Mazatian, Sinalon, on February 4, snt1l 3:30 PM; on February 5, 1966. 1966, and remained there According to.this source,. Third Secretary. cf the arriving. by air from Moxico Clty and was staying at the Hotel Freenan in Mazatian. According to this source, national Intelligence operatives in Mazatlan. regorted. LOGINOV had no: contacts while in the city except with the ship's crew: attempt was made: by the No soviets. to Introduce propaganda material from the ship. Enclosures (2) C(/ 1712 INDEX This document l: fee the une of your agency color nad ni. contents chould te further di grated withcut appropriate currimation. SECRET Group I EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC DOWNGRADING AND - DECLASSIFICATION Jeer ARDED 200 -1-79 P-11717 --- ## Page 106 14-00000 SECRET On February 21, 1966, PEDRO ZARATE MARNOLESO, Commandant. of the Customs Guard, Maritime customs Office, Nazatlan, Sinalos, advised that Mis men have been carefully watching the elements of the Soviet whaling fleet that are currently visiting Mazatian:. Thes have beon alerted to the importation of any propaganda or contraband, but; as yet, nothing has transpired. When the flagship of the Sovlet whallng "fleet arrived recently, there was no ong aboard who spoke: Spanish or English, and the Captain seemed/to be. completely lacking in Instructions: about documents. In order to enter the harbor. He did not have the necessary papors prepared. A Soviet Eibassy official was sent from Mexico City in order to straighten matters out. ZARATE sald that the purpose of the visit of 'the whaling ships was to take on fresh water nnd supples. The crows wero also given likerty. Also, enclosed herewith for reference are copies of the crew list of the Soviet vessel "'Iskatel" which visited Mazatlan on January 9, 1966. In connection with the visit of the "Iskatel," it is noted that a Soviet Embassy believed to contain Soviet Commercial Consul GEORGIY STEPHLYQVICH VISKO and. USSR 'Embassy chauffeur VASILIY STEPHANOVICH NIKOSHNIKOV, was observed 'on the highway leading to Unzatani on January Il, 1966, and was subsequently observed on January 1966, in Mazatlan. This office is attempting to obtain the crew list of the Soviet whaling vessels thhit havo visited Mazatlan during, February, 1966, and will make then avallable when obtained. 1 cc.- Naval Attache (Enclosure 6518 S 5 CR ST Hamit Pul P-8017 CARDES - --- ## Page 107 scou 611.2 5==1 15-5 Meeta otisco ?. In macion aclor noticacation 19 2922525 nee acintiono aco tacobad indebnakor and dog dicorn and darlier cor and toriad immanted I lunchess meet 202 25 20b- 1400 at the do Cordo Toctatart Sing canted tant lie callod in do. thr Station on a3 no madon the lindaçone. Boo the Coo. seen morrised co this call, tie Station Tobably soild have reccirce sho advanco notice to kaloonizov ard his Soviot flient companiors! 2o. 10-a0r come to Subj's cisico on 23 peS and tocother they went to tho 1a jorda leotaurorte octand to gord the report on dog'e condition fion tha Fempio Olinio to ¡cocoa. Subg asica joinor ming ne manted the roport, and locinov anarerod "ne want to tale core of your scald." /Corents subt will not cornlil. acros startled subj by ashtre what he knor about tho super cecret Jovis orconination "Place" lioments Bisd osplaired to tho Colo that "Pluga" was Corned all ovor latir inorica after tus arrest of Tichrona had causod lari-like anti- Scritle orcarizations to seriro into being in the latri countrica. Jous forreà "Plica" (which 1a a tourer nod recning sone kird or military init) In orde= to recsivo militami truininco Suoj Mono about tio or aninction throuh. tis contrato in the Iorteli Inbaasy in Lexico althouch ie in rot a romber, lio mures tie occan continent at about 25 to 50... The Ioroel1. Gout cent an opporter end-ins'motor to lexico. "embers lave cone from lexico to Issac? ¿oo danirine (Suj Jarous, Éncarce So candled their travel arcingerenta):/ locance stated that he would lee to cón Sacut the Fonders of "plure", decauso "it worla de intercotino in vale croanization could work fos them (the Soviets)": Iranov sas pleascü iie: Suodle menare that the orconization nas rilitantly anti- Jung indic.tod nithout too muci enthusiaon that he rould do ghat he could. iccinor mut srotior recuect to Jubg In a ruthor decultory sarnor, achine -Suaj's cooreration si Subj "rants to, can 0r 1111" comply. Losino: torarked: OSPIES MADE P-11712 --- ## Page 108 Premio and monted süi do dind. cut die cosction Oi tieso citicials e tag annal dron tai aad o) e third reint thot Subg eculd not recallo ¡cirno teãd Duel that dio Sovieto vero arsioio lo recrist screono in te Te dono mecursicù iniranation abeat tuo caplorees tho rodised for Suhg. i.m. Suo teo cenglissed tue né queation, autho did not iss iccimor no le unand the inconnationo /commanti dubj expressoù in tho CLO, Plo ferr cora the erodeto might trio do socrudt seracco in dio otitea, ona sor inat reasosa w.:! it lont.cor die C.0. to lini: his personali colls to the orrice. Thie "ou ancet on tuo need dor ecution es lanerel paincinled, but thieunt it int 1o:1nor moula so blatutly adontice his intentione of sibverting ennati tito i "soro point" in sabg's colutiono nith lorinov and tá esciolted co. M in drastating sactor cor the suturofo Locinov did not white donn the minos cộ the crolorcesa Inanov secigit un tie anorers lo Eriklocko's questions. subg soid "les mozon't rondje Hounov, estod di subf cruld nave thon by nost tiro. omonts For all the alora reggesta sie 6o0, instrugted subt to do nothing, exploinine that me nere elitlar desirave cons arder aselaiton on tro crurdo le. onoration. subd do "regared cog the oventunlity that no bay-wich to ein tie milation to tho Sorets/ : 3a. i tiss rete his first job abroad. Locirov carlind thot he ledooed an laida irarica seta counlo of leues, ani censioned hen Subj senaried that the dorseta dint hase oricial comisentition in trose contries, lorinov primeree cisat da sod deon in commercinl riasians and ether missionse. Suig stated it ag aia incrossion, Leenroe Loiner mentiored daviag boen in the junmles erd in thot isinst in coon on arediar rissiors of sabotare. leie intolle dal siano in --- ## Page 109 antono abiod cubo dom he cinca do corinóia Subd soid ho mantou coro tico to caraulado não improsudono, but roord that botaor 10 not "condo", spcais Inino miê ligee the soft ageroach, to sud mored do lá: nem conduzanio cracteent ca 26 debruaryo Dio seleciona mo aduress, 'aireace rogericù to te Station, 1s dv. Guibres do inico ao narco do rocisca lo ve Ate elicring he mas silcientl" loontifica ai caline for Zeroe o C.O, recomerda ias tie lattor be accented so dosimete thie instaice" Mia lore 14260 .?. 1-9 40402 --- ## Page 110 micried plainte Flintie ' 2740 29 Potator: 1965 C: 15 we 1220, bartolor titlested, ed coheverine to subj an eud candra do 25 20u a cace of mino Goro apacino Sibdo at die darier's curiostirng to inter-s Sanbeans "siteuront, -Cusesy at 0900. 3.. Subj. reposted on Zob tro sacry co his hadhore arct wash Sasha on 16 Peu. :.= £o2d Saclas, for he. fcund. standins to the side of the resthurant in Saaborns, that hono piey end haa got up cut of snick bed sucinat iis rite's inotinetions? dait to that 'te. masn't trying to avoid a rooting but, he was too sick ậy "Sashe subj outside and calked ith hin soard suits honce then tola subs to sunrit tó lue the findings on she comple clinto on Subala ¿ninoos, cha he mould cornera then to legeon (for medienl rovice). /Comment: Suld don, no Intention de doine 9o/. •Suly too Sasha that he and aro on to Jaenoo Salludounky nbout Saials micatine or bas, muclour polder, and that dabludovoky had jubt loured at hai roo mustna such peive, diale queásires, cabardorally lad nodd that eerivone is of Visa tasercut an can des Mie cprent of molçar power. Sanho Touched, ud tidy that was only sonoreder tilk. se correaced concorn to Sasta as to why he had been turnod. over to Valentin Lorror Sasha rezcated so provious statement that losinor had more orrortindty For outjido contre, oven visits. to Subj's ordice as fort of hig naturel consular dutiea. Artier, the chancover had been entered by their auporiore. Sashs uaid rat Lo: non would cot in touch with subj.: 3. The C.0. fruna out that wien Subj had contioned. Schcrarria to Sasha at on corior bet ns beinge secker for the presideroy of lesico, Snoha had snown Scat interest The C.0 Just 1s there mere any aos vity on travel to the Sovict Union (for, the mirnode of diccoverin: in Suby would bring-un the none or laria de. 1a Pne Gerontos, a Salena siplice émlogee interested in travel to the Soviet unton). sity coplied that done renters of the Jerdal commity in lexico were inquiring scat a trip to cho Sovict Union. Subado to. cula in whenever he hears to Loanor ahout a reet. 1040: But 3, in line dovin trail 206 66302.5550 irite •ard andresue craduai accumulatic. dn° o& his r.CH {o= 1 case of Ped case =r, ¿cates'ts that i? it rossinle. this lot over tr.e rext tro menths. P-11712 --- ## Page 111 1d-0d0 13-4-73 12-9 Jung mas ne fare Joche a hant tireo" anpicnie coutze-tied.engteruation jabgadrired Die 5.0. cmd called his office ong dab, cated ip te sere reing to je tinsted incistod 76 960% 102d Sanj to Co shasd rita 1a du Bel Sung' conontcé do the Goc, the results er ido neet des saulia ca a Dochoo. Suo lattoritold Suad tuat sinoa de has litte wort that tafeg his cande de die Sove:b, de la turnina July eier de lulontin who will serasdorth sunde who had not vagentinorice defore at the Sevenb, andrey renalcd das tut 003:011 richt with bir, talentin vao a nico rem mich border Signa, tonover, carred die dali for most of the bolenen or Co deto Cogna ccariaánod because Subj end nos gut. baciait the ahomera to hin ques docao Suis corlaco su nahann into Sauha in dum pith compleinta of thy he hedite acna sno materda nis diclmesa, nis vicit to Bannio, Sorah olinio, tho findinici ca she: •sans Colloned this reen the curden ce ais corplatats alout teé Sittets, raieà Hab that sale do vãs málliná to do semicos tos the Sovioto, hâ vos cod rotima "e "font essieents thes moré hondiro er do ciants to do mhat 1ộ conerate ea Isröchente Sesha started to scothe him in the sone old: way about hor inier cigt Mo litsle wings mora, cice, out Subj cut his oft. it about this tire, vole-tia calvad in by sorino tat ke nea Sasno dust rass alons to Subj the secks receive soon sicher up, and chat it is to to subj to toli then 12 he riii on sili ndt coco-puish them. Subá asrced to that trabesaled Saahn then stantiod Jugg by asians carectly why it.mas that subd nas andr con tre Soriot ünion. Susg ansmered cardidly that he dian!t really loi riy- ard;sadà the joviets znen na más not Adori ically with thom: Sasbe seized or tino to say that mas juat the may the Soviets mantea it Subd mas right rot-eo. COPIES NADE D- 11712 --- ## Page 112 Ros: associatien attest food ca tid date tood tied cased s-305-52 = 1. tina t9. xr0r0r3 his irisd, more scr to said totete ere caredo tin mid in the thrife, and ho Totes. lando coale wide crater! o reit territo Time bug to checie sta she corone an, tait to that to bad. is: of r.ales. mende do decodes, de mooger cord de dougreat on to mas Incidate ar conidate we sent presides da trieded me the laters Sing ela gadha dud calorian ete curbo he had starado cassed du to tro Stationd. ent dekarrin, do cobor-chon, ens trying so card to fire Jend in tie. Jewish Jaso, actlie rent root tor 15 Teo 0000 andr at Canborne Cestaurant en amanço, coe cala chas valenain cula pot la dacre coeuge he nos roing to: 3a told uto co, that done tire aro chen dart sened to not liban cigars so surgidio told Subj What Soviet écuriero no Agater transit Coxico to Havara, at that they do dicet crom foscor.. subd aloo ronilence that Palet fatercy lad bockdà rascale at Suban osfice last accli son a trinito i acotlan and danennillo. §i to cod, at first obaros the soot mita Sasha set cos 15 Feb, end instricted Subj not to bring the answers. further, he nas to thros the Sacludess sit mi5: saci at Secan as being too ridiculous to mi to a tumino nemoropezzar mat mes coron nonlodie about Us, colion on malacrisatim on, in salerants. abacco, Subj nas to curious concean to septia sbeut casts diren a contact tho mcaby dantt inon mat the score mes on everythin that had sona before in Subj's sort; saco Lastly, subg coula contion to Bagha tuat de sas reading the Ted Inhos Liter cacetiro idt encis Coyse, ê, 2. Mea deciaca to contiruo on the took os aimogiss Sasha and therefore have Subj nico his next sediat. Sidd pas later oprised o tie change in plans, and mill not shon ip es 15 Baù or l6 Febo 6. Subj adrised the C.0, on 15 Des that Susha had cilies to fire id misscà dis rect, end gia tie soremo on for 16 363. no sies on 16 Fare --- ## Page 113 k Junc. Subject visited the Embassy. twice this. day. but mothing of Interest occured.. LOGINOV came in and call' and tolkica made a chone to someone about volleyball. LOGINOV spoke in Sanniah and told the other party that he would be over to "the house"" in half an hour. Subject saw him drive away in his car. P- 11, 712 --- ## Page 114 14-00000 23 Juite 1966 35-71-30 Is lisievito Yolanda AL.FÁRO Vda de CACERES Butrago : Chiapas 130- A No Station traces of above name or on Gloria ALFARO. ch Request visa trace: Yolanda ALFARO Vda de CACERES Butrigo: (lives at Chiapas 130-A) If possible, also Gloria ALFARO at same address, C NO RECERD 23 func. 666 --- ## Page 115 CAZDED sio? 6680 Entradá - 1319 ArS.- NE pOS LOQUINOV. RARSITI dios que espere ua momento. Después it Culota ALPARO reguerda a LoQUIxoV que olla lo conootó en la nocho de la Nevidad pasada en caso de ¡a Bollora SOTO, LOGUIROV la soguerda, apenas de que la paçado tlORpo, AFiRO lo querro Irvitar a ua reunión ol sabado próximo. LOQUINOV no podrá apeptar perque es dia que olloa argumlsan •• una volada dentro do la andajada entro los seapañaros. ALFARO que es me lastir, LOCUINOY proguate ou nostro comploto. LIENGOY Te que na Roura sino y que ala guture platicas al menos. maiona por la mañana y poder saludarlo, LOGUINOV dioe que podrd 1 30) ser el viernue porque riañona tione por la salinna sus elases de Seciony Medicate ingios asi que podriaor el viernos on algin lugar de la ciudad ¿para toser un card y ea tado onu la mada lucer por colétodo *para proglear mas tardo. GLORIi que ca el 35-71-30 que es de "¿¿ su casus LOQUINOV 1o lamardentonces doannes para Fijar una ¿ Galcita. GLORTA que ella trabaja doco horas al ala pero onal nunoa Pi ostl on su casas aal que nofor lo llamara dañana aiseo. LoGUiNoy que osti bion y que si ontonços quiuna misur ol puede sechusar su alado de inglos y virlo, GLORIA que no da incesarlo o SE TERMINA EL ROLLO. 808 o se tri nineroe enter igle tie Yaron da. 115,15 60 55 22 JUN 1966 Chiapo 13: A pr.01ed.e --- ## Page 116 SECRET CONTACT REPORT SUBJECT: -DATÉ OF METING: AECELATIN, Jr. • 16 Juno 1966 I hed lunch with Subject at the Reforma Club from 1330 80 1500 on 16 June 1966. BOYAROY as bet Intonate had dont fled she passport photo of "Viktor" he lle said that our picture of LOGINOV was not 'Vasilio" whom he described as younger and not as heavy as FOcINOV's picturo. 4.. subject roportod that on 13 June ISAYEV called him at home and asked to come by: that ovening. ISAYEV arrived about 1930 and stayed to about 2030: (Confirmed by LIENVOY): Subject' suggested that they have a Martini. never had one and was ISAYEV said that he had interested in the ingredients and how it was put together.. after he had drunk half, Subject noted that he obviously did not like 1t., Therefore, Subject offored hin a Cuba Libra which he accopted and drank of this combination was the first time The result Subject has soen ISAYEV a bit tipsy. ISAYEV said a successful weekend fishing 3-5 June: that he had heard that Subject had had Subject admitted this and then sounded off about how rude YATSKOV had been (drinking Vodka in front of Nick and his friend, refusing to come to Nick's for a drink or inviting Nick and his friend in, anger at Nick's success, .ete) mentioned that he had met the new ISAYEY merely shrugged this off. Nick. then had spoken a few words of ingtten with kiktond thougan he was very nice. ISAYEV answered that although "Viktor" was not a flsherman, he had enjoyda seeing the Mexican countryside particularly the scenery at Pucuato. They did not discuss the third Soviet, "Vasilio.' FILE: P-3776 P.- 8588 P-11712 SECRET 0903 728181 418 declassicnican --- ## Page 117 SECRET 6. ISAYEV asked what his fishing plans wore. Nick said that he was so busy with his many probloms at the now plant that he would not be going fishing during June. Nick then suggested that they so on the weekend of 1 July.: ISAYEV answered "Not even Anatolly (XARABACH?" okay and he could come. This date is tentative and will be confirmed. ISAYEV remarked that his wife and child were in Cuernavaca and that KARABACH's wife would go down on the weekend of 18 June leaving them both bachelors. renarked that he would have to organize some wome: for them. Nick asked ISAYEV about the Soviet volleyball team. ISAYEV sald that he had been heavily engaged in working with them. the team for oach game, then went out with then to took them to the hotel, etc. and didn't got home nights until 1ram. Nick brought up the point that ISAYEV had never invited him to his house. ISAYEV, definitely uncomfortable and searching for words, said that he hadn'e invited them because his wife thought: that there was too big a Contrast between Nick's home and theirs." That Nick was "rich" with lots of beautiful things that thoy lived very modostly having inherited undistinguished curniture from has predecessor, etc. Nick pooh-poohed this stating that friendship is what counts and the circumstances of one's home meant nothing. ISAYEV ended by saying rather famely. that he would invite Nick to his home. Nick said that from ISAYEV's words and discomfiture, it was obvious that he: is ashamed to invite anyone to his house. Fanally, Nick said that it was his impression that ISAYEV had absolutely no immediate plans to return to the USSR and Nick feels that he will be here until November or December. Paul Dillon SECRET --- ## Page 118 1d-0d0 SECRET CONTACT REPORT • SUBJECT: DATE OF MEETING: 7. June 1966 I met Nick at his apartment from 2030 to 2200 in order to debriet him on the fishing weekend of 3-5 June. Nick reported that when he and his Mexican friend arrlved at Pucuato at 1845 on Friday" fishing YATSKOV and two -öther Soviots were already there 3. June in frone of the cabins. They had come in ISAYUV's Vl: Shortly thereafter the Soviets came to the cabins. and Nick greoted YATSKOV and introduced his Mexican friend to him. YATSKOV did not introduce the other two Soviets by name but they all did shake hands. Nick invited them all Into his roon but only YATSKOV came. He accepted a drink and loft with it Later outside Nick asked one of the new sovlots his name and got the answo Nick "Vasilio." asked. if ho spoke English. The other one then used an English. word This. Soviet sold his namo was Viktor and that he spoke a little English. Nick then asked YATSKOV which of tho other two was the newly arrived Soviet. YATSKOV sald that it was viktor.. Nick then lent them his. oxtra lantern and that ended things for the night. 3. The noxt day both groups fished soparately at Sabanita, About noon YATSKOV cane by and noticed that Nick was having luck so he brought the other tro Sovsto a spot immediately adjacent. They stayed about an hour, have any luck' and loft. They met again that evening at the • Cabins- ATSKOV was uoset, v1c. and his: triend had caupht 28 trout and the Soviet: none. Jealous and even angry. Nick then Invited Viktor In for a drink. Viktor did the same as YATSKOV,: took the drink with him. early Sunday morning for fishing. owner that the Sovlots had left fairly early Sunday morning. FILE: P-3776 P-8588 P- 885 P-1,712 Exclared to tui9a8... downgratis, and declassilicalien SEC: --- ## Page 119 1d-0d0d SECRET Although all the Soviets were ploasant and correct there was absolutely no socializing or extended conversation. They did not accept Nick's invitations to come in for a drink, except for the above noted occasions when they accepted a drink and lofe taking le wich them. "Viktor:" Nick described him. as an older man, to 42, mediun height, • 82-85 Nilos, heavy but not fat build, roundish, boyish face, looked like an American in general appearance. Does not English.. speak Spanish. Said he spoke a little However, their conversation was so limited that Nick couldn't determine his fluoncy. He obviously understood •everything that Nick said but his angwors and comments were short and simple. As noted above, YATSKOV said that he is the newly arrived Soviet.. He did not do any fishing himself but simply watched YATSKOV and the othor Soviet. •6. showed Nick a picture of BOYAROV. Nick couldn't positleoly identify it.. Our picture hus sunglasses. During. the day Viktor. had on a white covel protecting his neck and & wide hat but no sunglasses. At night Nick sar very little of him and it was dark. However, Nick did say that our photo was not at all incompatible with Viktor. Also showed him a photo d GAzIYEV and he said that this was definitely not (COMMENT: Since GAZIYEV and. BOYAROV arc the only new Soviets in town, and Viktor spoke English, he has to be BOYAROV. name Viktor when his name is Vitally?' 7. "Vasillo". About 28-32 years old, medium to dark blond curly hair, nediun height, very good athletic build, tough and strong appearance, the all-American boy type. Speaks pretty good Spanish but not as well as ISAYEV of YATSOV. There are only two Vasillys at the Embassy, BUTSEV and nrosmo but neither cones any where near the above description. (COMMENT: Nick's description of'yssilio" fits LOGINOV Ito a . "T. " However, his name is Valentin and not Sas1l1y6 I will show Nick piccures at the next neeting.): Previously Nick has net 8 Soviets; all in true name (mostly by first name only). Thus it is strange: that BOYAROV and LOGINOV should use phony names. 1o feve Paul Dillon wor OGINC --- ## Page 120 7 June 1966 SUBJECT: RequIrement for LIREALM & is requested that the attached Information on Sovlete Valentin Sergeyevich LOCINOV and Yevgenty NikolayerIch CORTISYN be given to LIREALM, Both of the Sovlets are known to freguent the French Club, I la requested that LIREALM report on any activitles of the Soviets' at the Club, or any other Club members with whom they assoctate. N.C P-11185 P-11712 P-11163 --- ## Page 121 Valentin S. LOGUINOV -Third Secretary at the Sovlet Embassy Born in 1927. Wife Alexandra, born in 1928 Son Dmitry, born in 1959 petro LOGUINOV is tall and has very curly, light brown hair. He speaks fluent Spanish and some English, He drives a green 1905 Impala with: diplomatic tags 19-DA. --- ## Page 122 Content Agent 5f 30m 66 In the contact regest 0? 12 Annil, Sulect trport a that LOCINOv dad visited hie-acons Girons the April and madg Long. distance prone cail 00 Croonavacs. At our mecting on June he produces the chons bili mics the phone number According to the satly She car! which agrees with race to phone number 2-30-65 The runder given to us my Suprect 10-÷721% like E. checked this number and found it listed to Moses gameso de la Fuente Callejon E. Prediado Humero 4; Cuernavaca, Y0 have do traces of inla him since Peopie. 62gea LouTOV talked fong and concono else's nano: minutes on 6acrile P-11, 712 --- ## Page 123 14-0000 132 SECRET 31 May 1966 MEMORANDÚM FOR A •FROM -- SUBJECT: Mr. Nothan L. FerrIs.: Legal Attache: Winston N, Scott Travel of soviets This office has recelved a report that Sovlet VIce-Consul ValentIn Sergeyevich LOGINOV travelled to Mexican port co. 27. May 1966. He expected to be back In Mexico City ca: 1. June 1966. Ho ls belleved to have gone to Veracruz: travel would be appreciated. Any Information avallable to you on LoGiNov's IN MEXICO CITY® # 10525 Distributions Original - Addressee. = 50-2-41A P-11212 Memo Chron Excited a fileral. - SECRET --- ## Page 124 ps: 11712. SUBJECTS. Contoot Baport/LIC03T-5 PCP- 2112 12 day 1966 1l we 1200e Subje office. By colopheno an attoapt uno nade to line subj up sor an LeFLorTeR. but the tico subj yes ablo to allot for moeting the representative fron Washington" was too lilted for the operator, and this the axicination was postponed to bows later date Tho G.00 anta to go on recore, any event, for belleving that the Mining van not epicomtato for dubjeoting subg to the leariar. Subj had been led over period of centhe up to tho polat it he carried out a break off tron the Soylose so olandesting work for those fust the nemo doy be hedi been soneduled for the examination, 3 Mar, ho had a econo with hin old Sortet one offloor, prishodko, and do nattor what aplond Subj han (aad ho has plonty) subj linda the break-off soones ouotionally wouring, Henoo, to have apring an ICPLUTER on kla at this thno, ho may havo boon inordinataly sonsitive to a fooling that wa pletratod hiss contre an at did aftor our adamant stend that he out 1009e fron the Sorote the Fisk of almonting suoy l en lonsumen was not, in the Cio. 'a opinion, vorth 1o at tile partloular stare of relationahipe in the operations 20 On 12 Xay Subj reported that on 30 Key at about 1630 Valentin Loginov cano to hia offlie. locinor asked subj if he knew anything about the Congress of Intollectuals that won soine to take place fa Mexico. Loginor sald that the Consrosa, whose topto was Anti-senitian in tha Soviet Union, was really anse-Soviet, no brought subf a panphlot in Sperlan "ho Jens In the Soviet Vatop" (petnted by (he Soviet inbaray hMoxico) - (attached), Subj did sone Loat thinking, boomund he in reality had booked the hotel roservations for the croup that was to attend the co Ho told lostnow that he had handled tho hotel reservations att the llo el Dol Prado. When Loginov aaked for the races of the delegatoa, Subj daja he didn't snor them Darler thet day Suby hag woon tersels lab inad, and the Congrees had been: a toplo or discussion botwein. then.: head had said that some new media, apealfloally El Dia: Politioa, and Stone, had oriticised the Congress as bedhe inti-Soviet. Tho toraeli Sabaroy notually as supporting the Consoss; but for polly recaone, hạd tó mạin lạ the background. An Ioraol1, named Tov, was in Mexico promoting the Constuss, but ho was not associated with the Israell Embasay, Arad feared scheduled to take plaoe at pirhago biat MAGIDIN - 11/2 --- ## Page 125 to Hotel Pol Modo on 35, 3è and as e, and so nad not @bernals for plante Socros Service protoction. Arad told Subf that elcit poraons had ooo. to_ Hedloo, brought be tha criety, Ho didn't know where they cane: from or wha thay were. diad was harm that sone nevapopore were defonding the Congross. istor Losinare rialt Suby called 'Arad to advico hia of the Soviet's Interest in the Constead. Subj said that Arad would be dining at hid hone that ovoning (11 day). 3. togtnor also told Subj that ho had beon la Veraorus beane of the goater thet had jumped ship theres to bald that ho had found the meanion, and returned Nia to bio anspo Taore had been a fisht aboard only, the desmon no hod had Not had hit & companton with a bottle and thousat he had killed limo The can had họt beon killed. 4o. Sub! anid ho would do solas to lew York for five dare on 15 Mav. He stay at the St. Rogle Hotel, COPIES NADE --- ## Page 126 SECRET CONTACT REPORT DATE OF MESTING 2 May 1966 SUBJECT. L. On 2 May 1966 Subject called me and asked for a meeting whleh cook place at his office from 1530 to 1600 the same day. Subject reported that on Saturday, 16 Apru he saw LOCINOV wun hia wife and con leavins the French Club at ca 1500% He noticed that another. Car, 25 DA (GORLITSYN a) was parked next to LOGIOV's. A halt an hour later 25 DA was stul there, which meant that is owner bad something to do with the Club Independent of LOGiNOV. I showed Subject pictures of GORLETSYN which he immedlately. Identified as the Sovler who was with LOCINOV the firet ilme Subject saw him at the Club, (comment: Since this makes two times that GORLITSYN has been at the Club, perhapa he is'also a member.) Subject reported that on Sunday, 24 April he and another member, Antonlo SARMIENTO, were looking for a fourth co play doubles: Subjeci noticed LOCINOV standing beside the tennts court and asted SARMIENTO to lovie LOGINOV to Join them. Howeyer, LOGINOV deciled and sald that he was going to have a swim with SARMIENTO a wife. After lunch Subject sav LOGINOV and SARMIENTO playing chess together and overheard that the are on a first-name basls. From the above Subject commented that LOCINOV and the SARMIENTOs have a close social relatlonship. 40 Subject Inowa SARMIENTO casually as an occasional tennis companion, SARMIENTO owns a plaatle factory which makes airine baga and simllar kems. He le about 35. His wife's name ls Violeta and she la In her late 208, Subject looked them up In the phone book and got the following Lating Violeta SARMIENTO, Manuel M. Ponce 143, Guadalupe In, tel: 24-21-58. 5. We have several LIFEAT traces on the SARMIENTOs lu social contact wIth NECHIPORENKO at the French Club. Evldently LOGINOV took them over from him; Now that Sublect has found a link, I told him to try to engage. LOCINOV In conversarion, have a drink with blm. etc. In order to establleh a direct line to:bim. PILE: 1 - P-12230 1 - P-11163 1 - F-11712- 1 = P-12703 P. Dillon --- ## Page 127 1 p. 1: 0824 LICALLE (Esporta da las • Abstl do 1256 Laa aotiridados an al cuo durante al aja do Abril, fuiron noraaloa on canoral, sin gabarco obares que con mucha fricuanota asturiaron locando al club crusos do 4i, 5:0 ú loabros Jornos con tino do estullantoa, ostoo en 51 Rogloidor turioron à woos cortas ontrovlatea con algunos do los iloabros dol Groo que duranto esto ma dojo da var un mayor cantidad con rolacion a otros mas, a varios sujotos dal cluu los qualos a continuaolos citos 9774 đẹjó de varlos ol Nonindo 3 volviuron o1 Lunos 11 ":l16rcoloe 13 3229: 2102 820 2270 "PRIK E DIG 96647 " 16rcolos 13 : .89 Sábado 16 Lingo 3a0a1o F16 16 Juaros Luzos •Viomia :21 22 25. (PAIK) 29 (200) 16730 • GoRt 3396 12009 LUCRY TRI 2120 " bogingo. 17. - "215rcoloa 20.- i. ". Tertos 26 ...i scondo 26: 30 no obcares ningun abadio on lao aotividados, no costento hay algunas mujeras que las dojo de var on algunas coacionas hasta 2 aaaanaa, untra ostas wal era, toa joabras que raportó ol luna 25 entro los cuales erjo qua venía lIk, 10a vi solamente 2 dia iteo COPIES MADE P-11112 --- ## Page 128 SECRET 27 April 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: Nr. Nachen L. Ferrts, Legal Attache Winston N. Scott Travel of Sovlots 1. This office has received a report that Soviet Vice Consul Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV: planned to travel to . Guadalajara on 25 April 1966 in order to attend the Congress of Mexican Travel' Agencies (ANAV) there. Also planning to " attend the Congress. are four visators: fron the USSR:. Viktor BOYCHENKO, Ley MIKHAYLOV, Lyudmila KUZNETSOVA and Asan AKINEDOV: Any information avallablo to your office on the activities of the above Soviets in Guadalajara would be appreciated: THIS INFORMATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE. IT NUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN NEXICO CiTY. • 10401 Distribution: Original - Addressee 50-2-4/A P-11712 Memo Chron Extern sos sotasan. SECRET --- ## Page 129 14-00000 Brigticis Gyn ch SUBJECT& Cintact Refort: 25 AIr 1000; entrance. • Salinico 25 Epril. 1966 arquinades, in cors 1. Subf reported that he ras at the nirport the nimht of 23 apr to recalve the INTurIST delecation, Kv remesentativer Ibariuion and forero mere also on hond. Soicienko was much put out because their arrival. had boon: doloyed over the natter of cotnining l'ericon visas. lo told Subj he rould bo 111 l'exioo only for the first day of the NaY conferenco in Guadalajara, becauso ho was going on to loatread on 29 A% to Inagurate Soyiot ship service direct between lontrcal and Leninetad. The others would remain in Lexico for the conference 2.. The delegates were taken to the hotel lcloina. Suble wio brousht lov, Lakhotlov to the defore, asked how it wan that ikhataw hed left the Soroton oscico to be in ITunist. likhailor sald he had a 15 year old danchter, in loacon, and wanted to renain there. His card read "Director of International Orennications", INSIST. 3. Subj had coffeo it the airport with otentia 1: noriend Vialo. Nothing as said of subj's brea off from lorinoy. do Subt mill aratt overturos bron the Soviets. He seid he my not planninos to be out of Mexico until 15 Kay. PiO! Paris --- ## Page 130 14-00009 SECRET Mair color report of Soviets LICALLA 25 April 1966 SUBJECT: SOURCE: - LOGINOV -Wifò: ZHEVTUN MALAKHOVICH Wife MIROSHNIKOV Wife NITROPOLSKIY. Wife MUKHIN Wife NIKIFOROV Wife SHPAKEVICH Wife PRYGOV Wife PRIKHODKO Wife RADVANSKIY Wi-fe BEDRIN Fife STRIZHOV: Wife ROMANCHENKO Wife SILNIKOV Wife SOKOLOV Wife BTOWTI Brown Dyed brown Dark brown Brown Brown with gray brown Slack Brown Blond Platinum: Brokn Bark brown Dark brown Dark brown Brown Black Brohn & very gray Dyed dark brown: Blond & very thin Dark brown Dark brown Blond Brown Dari brown Blond Platinum Brown Platinum Brown with gray Platinum SECRET P-11712 p-8954 P-9772 P- 6518 P-$7:70 P - 7220 P-9026 p:S167 P- 10011 P-2270 P-9289 P-9037 P.- 1:1579 P-8609 P-6414 P-$10 --- ## Page 131 14-00000 KIENDOY con Paulie! Whito. Cc- LOGINi 20 ATril 1966 Swish v. P-1/12 alice Thong tne Cano errived at Suij's aérico, one do the calo coploreca. of Subj cridently idiod hin that 's. ferar" gas here. üing came ires his innor •office to odviro tho Colo Unt (reonid inilerion) letitoros mos in his offico maling travol arrangerents, file CoP, reuninco is als outer drileo, but citi hio back to the ransacenos and hia coco turica in a rascale f - 1026 Subaquentage Subi told the co. tint acreate Irevir cor vention to che Soviet intondon 22 bre via dup toreco do mha duo so rotion to lexico on 24.205 Subj also mentioned that the Ita uSt delecation coring to the hiv rooting: in Guadalajora (27-30 Ar) hnd not arrived in cadco an acheduled (ma 19 Ag) becauso there had boon a delay in their recolino lexicon viens. tho delay ras occasioned by scsican demand for cinical bio ruphic Incoration in order to procose tho vioad. ino rouy of for has bean roacheduled to arrive in. lioxico on 23 Arr via sabena. The CoDe saw the exchance of telo on to tla infumation required for visa: Laguance, and notout the following Vitorkatchenko, bon 21 July 1925 in ituninals menident of INVIST; Pessport •D 01155 B, Laoued 6 Got 1965• Ler? uhallov, born 11 l'ay 1921 in Loscon, chief of the Internatioral deartnent; Sport C065257, Loquod 25 Sent 1965 soon Mhredoy (sic), born 24 June 1924 in Tashkert; chief of the Vacekintan. Courie Direciernto Pageport 069757, Losucd 24 Deg 1265. Indol Victoova, born 5 kar 1923 in Moscow; Latin Merican Departrent; Passport C 065784, Jasued 6 Oct 1265. Subj tentioned that at the Corenhagen Congrosa on Contress Granizations that he atterded 30 war to 2 Apr 1966, he set to Soviet "scientists" nd the INFURIST ron for Denmark: The " representatives fron the scade of Sciences" nere Connadiyi hadroyevich loshaey and Timr I. Timofciov (cards attached). 20. the CoO. who hod heard from Subj on Da in be telenhone that he had are his confrontation with Valenty Jeanor last week requested a full account of that nocting. Jubj reported Loner had, called him on 15 dr roquestins a scot someniore outside; subj inslated that losinor come to his offica. CAR DAD P-2'112 CP-11112 --- ## Page 132 td-innod 2. me dollonano diso de adde io ciaoo ero to subd'e offleco de noked Subg hor :is-trip (io auroro) lad teca and orocifically naties 1à Sigj ind acon Giretto •Padeced derter. Subl sentied thas he had foini out that diargie and hor hunband mere raca donino in Ital Ici nou acker mhos ingaghino subs tre recojved sa furoro en aruncelo bucking ou: co "T0, Dubj nnomerrà that he lud arolen te anno ibenchra, including ¿corso lainero of dir Franco, tha conajuered in cenoral that de Caullo vas not monce bus that his uni mas teo drnatio, that he nas annoiri overyone, and that ranco could not be icolatedo men Subj nade his break ofs arnouncenent to lectrov, arring Dut- I'a sorry to tolly you that Ita not solra so be abla to nors rith you ary nore. Thero aro several reasons." Loginov asked if arytrine had harponed. Subd roplied he had scasona. Indinov askod uhat they vere. Subg cald ho mas tired, he had a lot to dos and frankly ho mas plain disaprointeda tioro had beon bio doala nlannod, nothing happenod, and he mas doine just jurik. Intinov asked If that mas slojn final deciaion. Suby said you. tuo Soviot then asted. if they could talk dt over. subj gatd cortrandi ars tiro, herourn it mas nereed betecen thoc that toy nould cot hale an hour before the espected arrival at l'ex1oo nort of the unust reir cono to lexico. They would seet in the restaurent. subd told Locinov lo had traveled with dio dacarov, ma that thoy had regone very ilordly, ind he astod donov le he rinded that ho sar dic 1b amin. loginov said not at'all- dut not to cali tho ino at tho sovia er use the phono Cor ani calle to the sout di stntod in para. 1 abovo, tie linurist delecation dia not arrive on 19 aru, and Subd who knew of the rostioneent did not so to the nirport, and cosscquently niosca his ret nith Locirov. 30. subd, In his cuatecary ray assed "did I do richt?" Me G.0e gaid 1t vos Tino if loginoy cot tio no-nonsense ides that Subf mas throug The C.ó. toid Subj to mait until tho Sovs pet in touch nith hin again, and to havo their second weet, at which subs acain maies pericotly clos that ho is throush Ho 1s: to renain friendly thou h, and la iree to do ansthino he wishes re estabilähing conscos vith the soriat asboisndor. Subs baid he soula under an circurstances. rostpone his net with Lorinov urtis at locat the micht of 23 hor when the: InutIst delogation is scheauled in arrive. COPIES MADE --- ## Page 133 cut SECRET B5x100, DoP. 27 702ly, 1966 Ro: VALENTIN S. LOGITICU Recy: 4x8r4 1566. source: 4/8 (ula I4) (FOR PERSONAL ATTENTION COS) (13:00 his) Dates: 22 July, Inst. CINDED diese Some time ago subject is radio was stolen from his homo. He roported it to the police and nothing happened. He has continued to roquest polica assistance in this mattor, until the robhory and subjoot's complaining about laok of polloe attention was brought to the attention of Gon, OpETo, who assigned, or requested that an agent be assigned to gò out and calm down the trate soulot. The agent want out on 19 July, last. police hia is eart Da 20 July, last, the agant reported bnot to son. odoro that ho had talked to subjoot for some time about the stolen radlo, bùt that collowing the discussion the subject had aaled the agant "to work for him on cortein watters", offoring him 5, 000.00 peson per monthe Agont requested instruationa, don. CETO contadted i/8, alsousand the ratter and told the agent to accent the offer. Agènt again saw subleat on 21 July, laste and was glen his flost "assignment" by subjoot. This was a request for agent to leonte one NICOLAS JUAN BOSTROEIN and latter's wife, VALENTINA. GRUSDOM DE BOSTROEN, both described es Venequelan oltizens, and to advise subfoot soonest as to street address and tol phona number of roadno, do well as placo of empLoymeng y 50-6-91/4 1-12733 SECRET. 1011712 --- ## Page 134 SECREI • 2.0 In mado a quick check of the Gobirnación siles on the BoStRoNa, with following resulta: CORAS JUAN BOSTON: 7128.93 Born St. Petersburg, Russian In 1915. Indiation that at one tina ho sorved in laS. Navy, Presontly employed as "Diroctor of Projects" by stophene-Adamson de Mox10o, SiA, de GiVo, Callo Norto 65 #1058, Za?, 16; H6x1c0, DeFo; tol, 47-67-89, 47-42-22. He 18 I1stod as Vonezuolan oltizen. VALENTINA CRUSDOW DE BOSTROEN : Born Breslau, Germany, worked as translator or teacher or Russian at U.N. Presently emplojed as teacher of Russian at the Iboro Amerloano Univoralty, Prosently a Vonezuelen nitizon. The Gen. ligro of Stephens-Adamson de Mexioo La RICHARD SEYMOUR: BARER, a U.S: oltisen.: I/8 suggests that we may destre to oontsot BAkIR, to got a line on the BOSTROENa, and, if that source and others available to un give them a clear bill, that we may destro to contaot them and start à little backfire, 18 -1l1 cooperate ally with us. He would like to know your roaotion. (He l'a personally: Intrigued by the case, and will be anxious to hoar trom you ula thesame route baake mer? tann CARDED --- ## Page 135 TO OPI TA TA 10 10 8010-108 DRA GRA LITED STAITS GOVERNWENT Memorandum The Files fa viennes 22 J0l5.1066 FROM: Gile SUBJECT: V Natalio 1o At DEsh hours I had a telephone call from the Secretary of Coterracion, Ilc, Juis Echevarria, He dais that he had an urrent ratter in wiich ho needed oy helf. He asiad that this was a natter that President Cuctaro Diaz Orone vas personally mr interested. co Echovarria sort Jiencoy/? to see ne and gave ne the follow Ins incormation and asked the collere i lo or ma à). President Jia% Ordas is personally very lipset! by certain recent actions by. sone Soriets in Mexico. (Notes I: celleve, lut de not know this, that sore Sovirt ras triod to "ancruit" a sosree close to the President and that this has. "rackfired!") Palatin TOCUINOr, Societ (Ecomi XJB) Is of partic- ular and urgent Intorect interest lanthe, Pincident. I was. tola he schevarria on the telophone that the too name on the list he rould send by Lienvor/e would probably set the samé treatment that sons.others set in 1959% This refers to PNO actions taken in larch 1250 agalast tha, Sovints caught with Dematrio VALIIJO fartiray ant the Railerad Strikers: I-was ask, ed if. cruld gerd tunthings. to Echecarria urgently:. These sies 1 Summary. of data, in INUIMOV, particularly raying what there was to show him a "Spy"g and, secorry, list of lor Spies in Soviet inhassy, (Lote: These requests nete siven to mo oral- li and .cn a card 22 July 1966). ky Montoy/2,. when fraw Mim at 02:40.hours on e). Data on two Mirchloakers"s Fell ALTAME and, disce Lenin AlAWAVE:: Those two, are "nor and 3 Elle resire will card fre: Echevarria slich Lientoy/2 gave me. E.? asked Echevarria for his peraoral assistance in cottiro the data on Sovints wiic-itte leitican Foreian Ciri:" that has. I told hin this data, ith photocraghs particularly, would halp us. Fe ronised to get this data for is: and T'intera de push for it on a contiming basis. Diatribition Buys Sarings Bonds Regularly or the Payroll Sarings Plan 111288818029 Cos Lienpo/& 1P - 5530÷ 2ra-2 (P-E081)& ALFATS 15-2/20, --- ## Page 136 JILN.: mentines with Subirat. en il ind i.ed Cree 16.70 idice Prancis J. COIGNE tofulect i meeting, was set for bednesday 27 only cornir of ruebla and Jalain otrito t.. is claimed that ho had.rcintivorin.town :1s notes up to date. He had very.?lt.te o was Instructed to make every cliort 1 nily basis. •During the metino on *is wint was leaving and that rahlo •1: 19 in In the future. sublect sald abaolurly neer lalking about another tonic. I war rot ineratood me and repeated tint i war raving rint he understood. My impres:lor sas is leavine ond his reaction to my bit of n.:. i mini picted. (or enther his lack of ronceion) ¿ublect enters the car due berirs rolking. 1*11 tals a voly strance way to berin any kind of monelen tint he might be reneatine a proared ince wire I asked him the same quertlor..in 1 he would aive me the answer in thr afairly but he always. chanped it. enoup. sc writred that he was telling me something in ila on Cischalett It was a point that always bothy red me a matter of record. (rom his written notes) sullect saw the short Amerienn womar lererlously rhoningir subject's store to a tourist. ornay) alie too. 5orlet Erossy about 1130 hours. lie did not ce SHO one into the shop to use Subicet's phine rut the inori out of order. About the game time he saw terr who to be Americans enter the embassy. one was white ind neiro. subject went to pick up some hotties and to rach other in English. Accordin: to subject, told in l-m trint two Arcricans had visited the imbass brcaice they did not want to firht ir Vict Nam. Dren •able to identify the woman but the Americans are The Carier:. iIcow. said they left the Embassy at 1157 hours.) 'made. two vialts to the Embassy. once in the in -re early afternoon.: thnt ratkov told him that they wanted visas. ow SILNIKOV knew anythirg about thesp SiNTrO: 1s no longer on the main gate of i. inter in thr day i TINTKOV dronped by land made the comers nicet that Viktor KAlyGIN had heen placed on rar anin ratr once. more (contIrmed by the basebonces) ag that he (o1T.) wa:: "offically" the administrative "firer. He nir he enn now find time to eat Mexican rood with i: Od 114 he would be by the following day about 1000 hours. " June. SITNIKOV came Ir about. 090 hours and TiT, Tarmitoixed him sore scecial terlean food Ana's Day. He was there for about a half rucTsOV came in and ordered 75 pe:an 01 elvered that same day by 100 in: ments and at poon bours iner. •le..i three mide cases of ch.t. :.itIor. Is already there" and askrd fubject •ly to the mbassy. On his arrival at : ni.i that there were grours from all the aid hint each had broucht wine and food thir country. There was so nuch food and --- ## Page 137 14-00001 Cilici 464m espore un norentõe DoopuRa iT JOSE CUTE ALVAREA GAYOU enlada a su amigo roouinov. tete progunta of se diversidy el descones bleno JoSt LuIs dice que et y que ya de pues lo platicará y que sOlo lo llams para avisarle que esta de rogroso y que tambien es para avisarle que no hon tenido noticios de TUCHA o TYCHA y por osu quiero platioar por al LoGUINOV Se interosa on seguir Lao OlaN0O, LUGUINOV data de aeuerdo y nonan a lao once do 1a tailana pard a violtarlo para platicar de 0su,- 35 permite trenes att CARDED 15 60 55 JUL p-11713 --- ## Page 138 ATVA32, (nichoocan) core mila 570105/5(50 i6) KETORCY 30 Nov. 61 ALVAREZ, JOSE LUIS SEX: # CCA 7 650-C04-034 AMMA- 2751€ CIT- NEXIC 27 CCT €5 CCC ? ẠOL • MEXICC• МІС†САСАЛ ON A LIST CF RAMES CE ACTIVE MORS CF THE NATL: LIBERATICA: MCVEMENT -IN THE VARICLS STATES- MEXICAN ALVAREZ, JOSE LUIS (I di Jess?) SEX M DOB ? 050-009-005/1 HMM 06018 17 NOr 61 CIT MEXICO. OCC ? MICHOACAN • MEXICTIONIE DAGERATION MOVEMENT COMMITTEE NOV 6Y. SUBJ IS MOR OF MLN COMMITTEE WITH HEADQUARTERS: IN MORELIA. 1. * HMY. FLO INDEX ÖNLY 54:064=92/3 Litanial (detach) 20 dure (intende Into Russian Language Classes) I ALVAREZ, JOse Luis Att to HAS 27516 27. Oct 65 50-4-34 Page 20 Active member. MIN, Michoncan ALVAREZ, JOSE LUIS SEX M DOS ? 050-009-004 HVMA-20910 402 01 NAR 63 P1 CIT MEXICO? 0c6? SOVE CONTACT WITH CHECH ENSASSY. MEXICO •NOV-DEC E2. WORKS ON PERIODICO D LA UNIVERSIDAD AND VOZ DE LA UNIVERSIDAD. UNAM? KUSSTA 1201-04.167/ PRAISED REPORTS SUSU WROTE FOR THESE MIGAZINES AND SAID. HE WOULD GIVE THEM MONEY AND MATERIAL TO HELP SUPPORT THE MAGAZINE, NEXI. CARDED --- ## Page 139 Paul & 1.. I have reviesed the entire LOGINOV flle and have made coples of all pertinent WENvol alipa for the following P filos and bave included a note to that effect in each of these filess Mriam AVILA Ratu P581 Socorro FLORFS P-12259 Silvador PAZ Plata Erika KAMMERMAN -12775- P=12843 2. Atlached hereto aro coples of all the clips I found on the other people included on the liot you gave me. Besửdes thá Lị Aprll olip on Dr. Juan Lula ALVAREZ Gallou I found a 12 Jul 66 cali fron Jose Lula ALVAREZ Cayou, probably'at Toast related 1f not-the sane person. - Thie le the only nam on whioh- other there are any/possibly identiflable traces: (2) Aocording to a 28 June 1962 LITEA Contact Feporte Jose Luis ALVAREZ, was one of the students in the Tuesday and Thurscay, 7 to 8:30 p. la, Ruasian languasa classos at the IICh during the montha of February and Marai. (2) H8-6018, dated 17 Novonter 1961, basod on Information -fron LEVOY Unit G, reported that one Jose Lula ALVAREZ vao a memher of the MN Comitttee of Mlchoaon. (3) La a 30 November 1962 Legal Attacke roport one Jose Luis ALVI:SZ of Moralia, Michoacan, was named as one vao assirted the lational Ilberation Movement in Maxico. (4) "HIN-20810, datod"|" Marda 1963, Incluced the following Intorration iron-LIBUFOKM: "Ono-Jose-Luis-AEVARS2-(matrogyndo unknos) 1s putting-itema in tha 'Yon de la Pairersidad! (Univer- sidad Autonara Nacional de Maxico) for the Gachs. KURATA, the Chargo d'Aftaires ln the Grech Embassy praised ALVAREZ for bis reports and sald 've will give you soney and mterial to help support the magazine' ALVAREZ also works on the Chiversity's "Feriodico de la Unlversidad" (resispaper), -(5) 1121-27516, dated 27-Ootober 1965, provided sn 11 October 1965 l1stinz, agaln based on LIBIVY Ieformation, on --- ## Page 140 14-00000 which the naso of Joso Luid ALVAREZ was agAlo included as an sotive member of the Mil and a member of the State Comrittoo of Morolla, Michoacan, which had its general offices at Gulllerno Prioto 35-10 1a Morolla. b. About Gloria ALFARO, I wonder 18 she may not le related teacher at the UNAl Econorica School and - to Ofella NUFAO Lopes (P-11339) / friend of Antonio SARMIENTO (P12703) and bis ulfo, VIolete Both Ofella ALPARO and LOCINOV attended a Carlataaa party at the SAMENTO's last yoar (pertinant" alipa included vith the Glorio ALFARO material attached). In the 22 June 66 conversation Gloria ALFARO had with LOGINOV she mentions baving met bin at Chriotme timo. c, Copies of all of LoGINoVis contacte with thé Instituto ...do Interprotos y Traduotores, Inoluding the one which-mentioned aro attached. Senorita HARNANDEZ/ Othor poople conneoted with that outfit are: Lio KELSIN Sarita -Inu Jacobo Chansinsk1 3o Besidea tho names on your list I also found two alipa an Margarat (Magre) MADOR uho seema to be on quite familar terms with - LOQINOV, I have included ooples of them also. .. dodote that all of the calls In queation are Incolne calle Also to each of these people something la mentioned about classes. --- ## Page 141 Dilas Reportable? Jonging. Reports C. FOTOS 1022,.23 S 10 1.0 20:15 x200. $1% bujo In t2oa.0110 -cos Coxoroses 332O• Since at To 2Ckcd Siu- 211.01 Lege ches in pest rite et i tri repater agree? o-800 190:20; chico, do so ashit • o Saiday д.1 16. s: 13220050 3303 -703 1c. 139. c] 0209, y C 199 1 ho 1T..C $33 "209s ad C. -.01 120 23 1:11712 gordit. --- ## Page 142 1d-0n0d SECRET AMRANURE MOR TUT FILES 28 Jino: 1000 1o I called Subject he his offter on 28 lunc.. He said that he hasn's men or been able do such latrly because he has been travelling almost I trled to set hie talce during the last two merle mu he was out of town hoth Hires). to of three venes. Howver suhjeet has seen lorIN witis wife or child st the club He was never wies intelo Carrent. He has not reen. C0l4I15YN 3. I will call Subject deal in ali-July and seo him at tint time. Paul Dilloi FILE: 1-12703 P-l1712 P=11103 7. 912330** SECRET --- ## Page 143 ''.. 20 Juro 1950 Contact Repot:/ 2ICC3Y-5 25 Jero 115041225, Subj's serico 1o In scopenso to a callain ly Subj, the 0.0, mont to d06 Suld so Satiries Iraina 25 Juicol 2. Subj rupcated thet Valentin Louinor had drogneú in to tro ortico on 24 Juro to alo arrangumenta for a return wip to the Soviet Union foz (icoloi) Lecrov, who, lecircy soid, bad to be in lescer at the latest 4 Julye Subg said tw eculd try to handle, /Corments logiror said he sould coso by the offsco on 27 Jino with Iconov's pocoport, because thore ves tro litzihoca thrt Subj woula attoapt to got e kli flight for Wonor via foucton (requiriro, a U.S, visa [ci icorov), Im any everit, Subj tald the CiO, that ho nas not coirig to the J,so ratassy to rcguost tho visa, lue moula buo tho viole probles to xi! tho rould hove to said iny vioa arcinaunts that vore requireù. 3o. Interostingly onough, losinor took the opportunity to brirg up operational attis spain to Subj, and Subj used the encuine alscussion to rolo his stince Literly clear to LoLinoy.. Tho convursatica ront sore of less as follons. Loginor said: "You're ead it Ic." Suby said; "may should I be rad at jou?" Logicor culd: "Socauso of l'adestio" (rotering to the fect that tho Sovs had firot divon a travol requost to Viaion l'ajestic to co servicca).. You kior to have to sireud it around anons frienda:" Suòg shruered this oft.. Then Lostnow asica: "¿o you still mad?"" Subf roplied: "I's not sad, and I never ras. Loo!, Valentin. " (and then ho ride his first attempt at clorification, suving in effect that in normal friendly natters thoy more like brothera, Subj exaggerated as 13 his menner- Ecationine intizato catters liko "carriar" and "even unto doatihasta la querte)" but soying that that was the culniction point "arything elso" mas finislod); Lozinor sald (without battino en era): "I had sce buciness for you.": Subj. cut his shorts "Don't bring he enythins- isportént of not important- you can keep it. You sant to go for cocroes you rast to eo out with girls; - sita. such ploasr; cuthirs up to that point. Lid I want you to understand that clearly, Don'i force no, and lot'a be good frierds.". Loginor saids "You'ro sotting difficult." Subj raglied: "so, I'n not di ticulto had there's so damaçe.. I rado y decision - end your chiefs will understand zy position." RDED PRIZ --- ## Page 144 2. Losinos tried açain: "' Good faens of yours ran sprointed Chich or the J.s. Recal Somico - Paul Giciron B'o a fricia: Of jour?" GUIDAY ¿ubj cecaro a littlo heated in ropiya "tes, solo e good friond. Iri11 ainays do cloco to his. But you dot tdo very clocau any plans jou have los Ful Giedro, forect. about thes, 1o that olcar? i son't do a codden thin. a togo you indoratané trat. To'To friends (yoi bad I), but sasido. being rrierds rosiod!" Loginor too% out a pleco of paper crá started to read iron it, astiás subj is to knom tho can "Canardo Vetelri»-'approxiaoter 55 years old a loricra Jea." (attached is a photocori of to pieco of saper lasinoy had been rcadirai and which he left behind or Subj'a dost apparontly by ristaie.. It's in Pusis, ee subj vas not able to transicto completely at cirst Glanco. Suvi plans to retur the original to jogiriov uhas ho coaco by on 27 Jino. Inile Loginor mas mesdira, Subj scid insistontly: "I donle knor tho saa, and I'c not colns to. do an thing " LOsinov replied. "I's not ickirs you to do arything 1t's Just ¿hat I don't now (about hin), Abore Faul Giedro, he's a 8003 frierd of yours.. Siby said: "Forgot it."" do Subj esteà tao C.O. - "aid I do wrong?" The C.0: replied that Subj had saso recuticully, but he has to expect that the Sovs will keep up all kinds of messures subtle, stall, or oven ereat, and not so subtlo. Sit the wey la clear a22 ho has to do is say "no." subj said that loginow had brought hiri a bos of "Purch" eigars (Cubor), end subs in usual offered to pay, but losinor preased thes on his. Subj then said to the C.O, homontod an expression of jolloy on hon ho should hindlo that kind as thing fron tho sous- take the gifts, altor offering to pay? refuse outright? Do c.O, said ve nculd lve the suidance te needed for thst situetion. S.. Tha CoO. Mill drop ground to Subj!s office carly next rock. Ladeziuss tho Cir, tola Suba that there cas a rumor that Olen Nechiporenko ass seen enound tomhe, Subj said ho kren of nothing on thät score, öut arioted ¿: strongly- since he was sure Olef zould tave contacted hig. The C.O. under scared that Subj do nothing about the rior. Prai 1/6/2 allan's 'itseling this. --- ## Page 145 td-0n0d укруї вібльмою си 5лет, міжний байки ziee- Маурисио Выбеляци CARDED --- ## Page 146 1A-0D Eduardo Willinana • sello plato guit fine in the Relie cut Maurico WEBELMAN COPIES MADE CARDED (P-11713 --- ## Page 147 ta-indos 10'5 riaone 300% lasis croCo 1551618 10?000 ÷20 16l 45 .5? 17 Station traces. o station traces Paul CIDIS. GUIDRY CA. ! --- ## Page 148 25 9.8026 miranda tani d bed ironed in at dis accice on CO July. too) Logaron sold Sundoct that no and recei;:. """""" man ring to digo that "chog" moe dory dicappointed, ¿i died, ana trog rud hojen that Subj would Coopirstoo subs anerrito monroot maid tie a broken rooord by noi) that he asili ma •a friend to emila, that hu run in thelr sido, he was their none bat ho can't do aig a de here they woulda't try to force hire because he- Juat cant: in anschine for ther Locincr Are us: to tood subg that Puvol Tatskor was leaving for Rioacon on adit (e vaa in subjes officó to acco the arrangerento)i end would ho returnin? in a ronth.. He icked thet sord Yatskoy con bring back to loncom Subd said o tad chrendy told his: rothine he con't do arything for then, locinor then nuked h t.!:9 rote irant back to Subg anù Suba snid sot a thineo He dolande hanu do get citing "rudern" (A Societ astroon og had atrended onc 12020) that mould ho sire with hin torinor appreciatod and tortid torn luof cordially. /Corments Many did moreo: doo the roco of ragor to had lert ir Sung's office -re sene a is did aboded to inquire aöcuty and Subg loft it at that- no didnte tillises orini the sul • 779 2 touch te ens the plece of paper to roturn to locinor/. • 2. In respirien tc coro inquiry subs centioned the names' öf sore deplicanto for travel t..t Erich. Apparents do echolony ferruss to take place in loscen in du:'t 1966 Los noy had scared several applicanta to subja offices jullos medioz de. Stonen ad me te-(Jr. Fernandest card attached) and tro friends, Ir. Fernandez cade, inquiries best travel arrancoents. She has not cose back yet. • Licencisac Lictano Lora had come to tho ofrice (?) on 21 July to arronge travel to the coviot triin. Subj ooid that his amployee, tirien irila fitz, who handies trus? ratters, hod told hia that leeaby had been invited by too Soviet Ambassador anu clio that té ma a close friend to the dexican icb to loscon. Tue Monteurt Travel dores, in Tiguana had transferred a reduat to u0j to handle the ravel to the soviet Union as" touriäts for two "Sesoros" "Heria Jesus de "Abakien and Stela Castro. /Concert: the don. told subj te sented more info about these applicental Cy to P 555. P-2112 Hematio --- ## Page 149 3o• Phe Cod, redmini suda diat so mould Like additicaoà inconzation about she individualo rio hod lost to stina she kerobiolorical Contess in loscoI. Bio C.0, nusuested that Subg hore sureno in his offige extrac: soca the folder Subj has all extra information tini do to adduced, ouch ss, address, 25o, rofessione eto. Subj said he would try so caré it done bozore de lestes ca his trip ion 31 july). : Jubf auxed if therd pas anyahing son about "lors" (Gastetres), De Ca, said he had word from fashington abcs she errind rules la casa to (subj) mere to so to Sentiaco de Chile. ihat te dois abcut seoins loro is his oun arfsir - but if. he dons see Hors: Subj'is to anié reference to our "business" in Mexico as fer ag voluntaring inforcution is concerned. Mat Horo does vis a vis Subj is aerb's business. she C.0, will cot to see subs tufore be leaved for Furope os 3I July. --- ## Page 150 75 July 1066• Ditton Tote: This. Is a translation. (ty Lenvoy) of the brief report wa sent to lite pol? (ria It. vew/2) for Ilrama...... FIles: Talentin I6 1P 11712 shived send Sisters) Capy made to of --- ## Page 151 VALENTID SERGNESTIC LOCIROV ¡cohe de necimiento: 25 dicicabe 1927. Fuplco: torocr Socrimin un ir suboisa Consulor de lo Ha bajoda soviético en Losico. Dosicillo: Jenncio istora, 131 Colo Tacubayoo Autoabril: Chorrolet lapala 1965, Licencia 19 diploaltica. Idionan que habla: espatol con fluides y rogular inglés. Corrora: 5n 1955 se unió a la KeR 1955 n 1957 concurrió a una escuela de entrenanderto do De 1957 n agosto de 1960, funcionardo en ol Cuartol Gencral de la KGS: en losche Do septicabre de 1960 a coptlembro do 1963, Aerogudo on In Habana, Cuba. Dicionbre do 1961: Voj5 a juana Ecuador con el equipo corlotico de Soecer. En cote viajo llovó una cran suca de sinoro porn los Pertidos Comunitas de Panoná y Ecur dor. 17 mayo 1962: Pasó por léxico on tránsito para In URsS en uso de liconciso 9 septienbre 1903: Fartlo de Cubo para rectosar o la USSe Septloabre 1963 a julio de 1965, estuvo cono funcionario en el Cunrtol Genorol de la nGb en Loscus. agosto. 1965: Arribo a exco. La Léxico LOCINOV reamplaco & OLEC H. NEOLIPORAO, otro clocento de la-KuB, haciéndose cargo de todas sus fun clones J do los ogentes de intoliconcia. En enero de 1966 Intento influcnciar y reclutar a un chofer de la tabajada Norteoricana en loxico. LOCINOY es un arente de Inteligen cla nuy capacitado y deussiado notivo. Debido a que no tione otros responsabilidados citos, puedo dodicar el 95 do su tienpo a la actividnd de Intoligencia. Toncnos: conociniento de que es funcionario de intelisoncia de la Mes desde 1955. •Su Jojo Inmediato de cate croaniano, en Lexico, os INVid Ae YATSKO%® --- ## Page 152 SECRET 22 July. 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Information on Local Sovleta Passed to LIRAMA In response to LITEMPO-8's urgent requent for certain information on certain local Sovlets, COS on 22 July passed the attached Information to LIENVOY. LIENVOY -2 will translate lt Into Spanish and give it to LITEMPO-8 who will In rum pass lt to LIRAMA: Paul Dillon Attachmenta FILE: P. = 3634 P - 11712 1.- P • 885 P = 5530 P. - 5683 30-6-72-2 SECRET. --- ## Page 153 1d-0n0d Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV DOB : 23 December 1927 Positiona Third Secretary In the Consular Section of the Sovlet Embassy, Mexiço, D.F. Residences Ignaclo. Esteva 18-1, Colonia Tacubaya Automobile: 1965 Chevrolet Impala, License 19 DA. Languages: Fluent Spanish, Fair English Career.: 19551 Joined the KGB 1955-57 Attended the KGB Training School 1957-August 1960s Officer In KGB Headquarters, Moscon Sept 1960-Sept 19636. Attache In. Mavana, Cuba December 1961g Trevelled to Panama and Ecuador witha Soviet soccer ream. On this trip. he carried a large sum of money for the Conbunist Partles of Panama and Ecuador. 17. May 1962 g Transited Mexico en route to the USSR for leave: 9 September 1963% Lefê Cuba to return to the USSR. septenber 1963;-July 1965: officer in KGB. Headquarters, Moscow - 3 August 19651 Arrlved Mexico. agents and dutles. In January 1956 he attempted to cultivate and recruit a chauffeur 'at the Aperican Embassy in Mexico.. •TOGINOV Is an unusually active and capable intelligence: Since he has almost nó overt duties he is able to spend.about 95% of his time ca.intelligence actlvity. Ce: 1036-9111 --- ## Page 154 Sovlet Intelllgence Officers Ststloned In Mexico 1: KGB (Committee for State Security) Ceputy Sergey Second v. PAY Aleksandr V. PRIKHODKO OFPICERS: Yevgenly 1. BEDRIN Ivan A. BEKETOV Alekaands M. BROVKIN Vladimli A. DOLCOV Yevgenly N. CORLITSYN Boris A. KAZANTSEV Vladislav S. KORMUSHKIN. Valentin I. KUCHEROV Svyatos Lav. P. KUZNETSOV Nikolay S. LEONOV Valentin S, LOGINOV Vasilly S. MIROSHNIKOV Leonid V. NIKIFOROV. AleRsandr A. NIKITIN Vidimir N. RADVANSKTY Viadimir I. SHPAKEVICH Georgly S. VISKO Pavel A. YATSKOV Yurly ZHURIN Boris S. ZOBNIN 2. GRU (Mutary Itelligence). Chlet: Vladimir N. SOKOLOV Deputy Chiet: Georgly A. SHÄHUCHKIN OFFICERS: Aleksands M. DENISOV PetT F. CORELOV Vladimir P. GOROBETS Yurly N. ISAYEV. Anatolly V. KARABACH Viktor L. KHUKHOREV Yurly A. MITROPOLSKTY Valerly V. SOKOLIN Ruslan A. TUCHNIN Konstantin R. VORONKOV Ivan V. YELFIMOV --- ## Page 155 14-00000 20 jug 66 Seat. that the you wig lit print rit can clevote 85% no consular wort I 1 hours a weal office hono Ville do 7145572 vite Zilos Valentin -LoGiNor PS. Jame applies to the 7 entell fue CP-I1112 --- ## Page 156 Paie 10.a (lection) Frosting tie too at 1730 34. Valentin "ol ju in to male a relephone call. Apparoatly ME : (co::: pain chinos that I ras able to hear wis that ie sir ior that. righe, that it night. he dreams chat "oodid tad cosurion iSundiv). they coild so. sriaai:." '3!. Troy malhod for-quite a whiie and se seamed guess mllant." Ho told her that he would take care of everyohind itista I went outside thé soo- 1100000. Per. 10 finished talkios, he ranted to justify: hiasolt to +0 br wife is in saying that he is a batchelor because his caravase. S122221631-192151 2019 Toch cer thing is roadil since I know that my friends 10N'E. 0000 iO.192 S:znd33, tha: is rouse to.ea. - I has nade my progran for today, I0 57j10 loite. to take ny wife and grand- child to the counter and eat outside the house. 3'2E ::* 1?59. wich is the hour to close, my wife and Trunichilc alicadi there. Mien SILNIKOV arrived to drink 3. 303r. loris idoolint pretty bad frox last night's "drinking Do!!'" Me tirary solebrating the Albassador's return. He told, re tres wore srintingdl night. But at this time 1t was rainst oiie ned so that I couldalt close up and leave. the store. wife asked sin wey he, bad alwiys thought difforon ly isic) in not coxing to eat at our house. And- oa the moment to said that le told core. My wife shot me a "Miria kere; loo's and dinally sillikov, broke the silence saying; I. will be back ina minute".. Then he left in the rain which naied i lictle.. It then started to ans.1 ar dore We hass devan by the ambassado oka naitor (STRYZISY) 1 le sial' pirk in front of the store but in Gelati, the -street running pirillel to the store. iri to teli he They siLNiKoy came was ready. lie shut up the store, got into the car and drove to arnoise: ve paried the car in the street and entered ay house.. Once inside the first thing they did was to inspect the house in great demail eves the "azotea" "I think that the house pleased then. They made me show. then everything including the bathroor and bedroots. Then we sat at the table to drink teguila.(la copa). and See; chicken, una soja, ands rutsado witchy wile served barbesued they ate with relish, o: so it spered me since they ate everything served. them accospanted by bleasant chatter. But he didi't even mention SECRET extract froin Ricaul /i Nite Catted: 26 rug is attached to Ricuul. Contact Depart cated 230upust 1966 --- ## Page 157 1d-0d0 BECRIT I asked subject if ho hed mentioned stilikove pornographic negative to the latter. At firet Bubject sald no, then your that he had asked BlIntsov about It but Slinikov sald that the negative didn't belong to hier but to Vallly who took it back to Moncon with hin.. Subject added that Valli had roturied to the UsaR about two weeks ago. (Coments This 1a moat probably BUTSV whom Subject calla Vasilly and who returned to the vaiR on 24 July.) (Becond Coumant: Thie' 1a another exonple of one of 81intkov'e vulnerabilties evaporating into thin air).. Concerning the item in the notes for Saturday, 30 July, In which Blintkov hid in the ballroon for twenty minutes becauge two other coveta came in, sibject had the following to say about these two soviets. ntin (E forro), then follows a perfect description of LOGINOV. ledinirs here follows a good description of KORMUSHCE Includin not Vladimir. I asked Subject about the discrepancy In the 19 July peeting wher he seld that STINKOV and PRABiCINiN had come to the store on Saturday 16 July but bly notes said, that PRASHCHICHi and him replacement had come. Subject nata that he docan't knou ho PRASACHKIN'a replacement 186. Me aleo couldn't explain the dlacrepancy, stating that he couldn't remember the 7. Lalso acked his about his Itemof 21 July in which at the request of VALETIN he had delivered two cages of refreacon to General Cano 32. (We save no soveca at colo address. de Changed It to Meneral Icon 39 CaKTi'e The VALeNTIN noted above lie LodINd then Subject delivered the two cases only a Soviet vomen was at home. he described thie address as a angle house nich is undersolns renovation inside. In alecussing STinKY', recent work fixing up the Embasay I asted who actually aid the pork. Dibject eatd that the sovlets do not like to deal with establialed sirn for, repaire to the Embassy because they charge too They prefer to deal' with mall independent, people whom they can beat down on the price. Bubject loons of two nich individuales Licoil Contact Report, 17 Gugust 194,6 BECRET P-11712 --- ## Page 158 16 August 1966 There Is no derogatory Information on the BOSTROEM couple in the United States or Venezuela, However, we have obtalned the following blogrephic Informatlon on them from Venezuela. Nicholas Juan BOSTROEM Schrelber, born 23 January 1915 in St. Pétersburg, Russla. Cedula $983566® •Yenezuelan Passport #207100. • Trävela::17.December 1957. -left Malquetla for Miami, 30 October 1961 entered Verezuela from Mexicos 22 November 1961 left Venezuela for Mexicoi 26 December 196l ertered Venezuela: 6 January 1962 left Venézuela for Mexicog: 5 December 1964 entered Venezuelag: 19 December 1964 left Venezuele for: Naxicoj 16 March 196€ left, Venezuela for Mexico. Malentine GRUSDOVLAVRIK de BOSTROEM, born 2 October 1923 In Breslau Malquetla: for Maxicos 25 June 1965 left Venezuela for Distribution: Or l9r V. EOPQANOV'D PENAQUM On 17 Aug 66 LOGUINOVP- 18: 50-6-91/2/7 Nicholas Juan EOSTROEM Schreiber Pe 7-11712 --- ## Page 159 • 11 Aug 66 AND FOR RECOND In sia morthly report Cos Auguit 1966, LICAlin enla TArsOr on ed to navo taxon PRIKiuso a planes mon I nobod shy no sought that, bio navered! PRIKHOO de not herA (he left 20 June on homi loavo). PRIKIODSO and: beon entering the funny through the min door and was soon working in window # 220 Mos YATSKOY la entering throush the rain door and wao soon tonice at thie vindow. rareroy aleu had the sae contact dith MixtUror who pRicHORo hed greviountr hed. Nor that Yerstor hoa alsO LOSE (4 145)e LICALla sinko that LOCIMON la probably tolns hia place, (Thie last statement la not olear, whether locitor lo tatans YATSKOV a pLaco 1a ArStOres ald Job, shich would be mont lostoel Or Whether LIcallA dainke WalRoY nay now be In the PRIODO Jobe In any CanO, PHIKHOIKO hinelS should be beok acontarily.) R 685 P-2270 P-9026 P-?1712 --- ## Page 160 Cyps On Sunday 2 Cup 66 et can, with sevent perple in it enter the Carla road fa Cremarma concent dentify my f the secants P- 11712 --- ## Page 161 1. Ser oy dorstration. 24, did riat, "it too tore do the Tchlonirs Soviet travei arranurentor ironitro, and child, Miklta, Confirmed en Sabcna-f9r •caládo Gerchodorto, truno (ire), cadideos, Cordra and Vladirin, Salers, 7 Re nicencinio Liganno iron cored into Subj's offaco 28 dili (?) and mos VCry "hon Sabl did art tve ccacircod: trovod to satellite countrios (includin lunania cho csdicule in) sendy, lora runded and said to rould go take tig aron,dronts Sees there, Plans atos in loscoe a renthe ¿us freo tickos on torontos lorigo so ladrid. Jubf booked his for tavel fron Madrid t0:0 Masterdam, and returne Valentin ee dropred in to Salj's offico on 27 July but Susa nso too busy- to acc nor called dull or 23 July and zade an appointrent to see Subj at 1200 on p9 3ul" it the cleo in rexico Hostauront neor Subj's offico. me C.O. utricord to subo sha: so conticio to ploy the sero tune with losinoy di triendo, too- rosi, 30 july the Polo too duba bricel 1a hio officc, Subj's wife hac accompanied hia to the orrie bush:so :.. 1all le muraring it while dubg is may do his. sordere do subj, hin cice to not cutting of the on the rife Eather, around, Suba ras solo to Tic aurooted poner play ly anchor ada Yatskora trail armen tor Pricon to not Hith Subj junt to contra lavol ,. ask Subj acain in they could bring Suty Mord so to tho flor de lexca too, dir contributed nothing to the conc-uncon had civon PriModto MiCe dear lu enins tem back tro kilos of cavier). For the promised additional infrination on the croup tho were piro to the icrobiolorical Concuba in dozoca (so provious Contact Renort. for complete list), Subj turned over to the c.0. tou ittiched isst which stres only telerhone numbers of the profcasicals scine to una corress, and in sone cases the positions. To coyo told sother thar to mit drop in to the office, if he could do anythine for Fei. "oto Guld not due back until the end of fugust. Cy to Pati 919137. 11712 9-9371 P-2712 ? 11917 --- ## Page 162 14-00000 er had to do cont dare card durin i warn thi dion out that Wage tad and hernetiri, Masoo (006) care do A 1110 du for a sup os "tea" tie sun oldalniron as every aturda, Cinco 10 coco messagin, and out tier atustede lo told me that in his countr (cage) can tave one ver. dorod succums word tre, inve too enlaes no their fine roles. While die pople ac arman nates canuage ee the prople an in; thnt every daccaculty cais. mdraco mic e cith ard site calmness min firinlar ou can wine de podia tara tea applain mi lots en ros lace nto berter 15 not vari od, hiel could uncessiond, and what lie acant for te.to indergraid tas tO cree monto recally our come all diceiculties, and us his alue Poil to iront an she bour de triumph. Thead friends (wove) ire ear obedient in seir superiors the will even sind 20-25 arutes in shn antercos en a store, so wey would not be discovered by treir pas ja chat ho penco to my triend Estanislao (SILAIkOV) toddy: ans an ideassureder cut los ue betarion) at 1140h horeruse to friends" (sors) came in ros one at then is rone other that the incurd secretar. of unn aborandor, a houga be (tro Asbassador) is 70t in jesteo, wizzin tamin lot di power to discarias rece win. do ca sipline er ten duate. Pranalation fo 50 Quly 1966 --- ## Page 163 1018,80 1 14 unt it. le candlana pileis lind to ho mont thre one day in .".l10. '1.19. denial que thre notice dean out thne the had been proporite or i never proo: 150 ca long and 60 em wide. only her daide us to came in at lilo in cord cup of "ten" iris il.o i..:. Me him sie chichigron as every. vitirder, sinco'it 1,0F !!!' i me tuit otarted, in told me. thnt in his country we lag mound wire the door die car lazer: ers: du precin obarete corrid sth dewelro! nrin trii well. a their fine robes. While the prople se Alin to have a bruin, small as a finin ot ricio: Mr mopin so in that ever: difficult: in i959 T1?1 si.hicolnnegs.and.finnlly.ou.cnnwin..r: 15. dis this tome, ince his sprich is no: vy and and what he mint for me te intergland as nil cirriculties, and thus hitli 70 i2e4 -53: " trumphe Tege friends. (ove) are ve the: sit; insan the will even stay 20-25 minuts ir .5321T ter mould not be diservered by their wor arcaned to my friend Estonislao (CrlNIKOV) bodny hind sodo cub jo. the bathrcom): at 1140h becnudo two priones (Sovas in amate fir as none other thet the sc secre ar ai the Amar enor, diçura ho (Mo inbassador) is not in lexico, thuesslks:s roblike Heart lint. resets iner a lot os poiser to atarinkir these who dr d. "midt to too disciolino ni the state. LICouL Mater 30 July 1966 --- ## Page 164 27 July 1966 d.::81001 CONTACT KARI: • ORONSKY SUNCE 1168001-1=1: 1. 10. 18601-8 on 27 July at 1930 hours (COIGNE was slik). The mector me danil tectes tects indIset the next meeting for COIGNE in and location Meanesday, 10 August. Tell XIGNE no wul mr 1..01l.19000 pores lor adlary for the month of July and at the end of cami ho will owe nim another 800 pesos for August.. I always pay dir it: indof she minath. Do turnt beer two dudin microphones and I gave them to Feldinam. My may noses wire installed in his sliop and we have taken the Prora our The bene paper attached was found in LICOWL'A noes (pride top rue 250 of June. He said he did not recall how it had goteen there and did not know scho had written and drawn on the - l'" tory od since the word written on the picce of brown paper: and ine-last ory in LICOWl's notes are the same - but the handwriting Only LK OWL should have access to his notes. KWI. 'swatted anes from 27 July inectlug (translated by lEBNING: SIL MINU Wiriestir. Tochy my friend Estanislao (SILNIKOV) came.to Trik a loa at il bout tom, and I asked him about the photographs which he hail god me he wänted me to make from a negative which he has. He answered to he was going to look for the negative and bring it to me. thy nother our of his friends (tc. Sovicts) wis Icaving d! now it was Visiliv's curn (BUfSEV did leave on 24 July), outbout? years old and now it is time to teach him how since for thoscof us who live in a free country, is lite of this people seums bad to us because everyching is different from what we do. They reach us to love our Progress (?), to live well with pur neighbors, to help the poor, to give food to hagers. While they comato nur country 10 create disorder and crcate distance within our tints and in our work, and they infiltrate themselves everywhere in order to sow hatred. They show us evcrything which ts produced in their country and how much they have. But they import things from our countries through their embassies. Daily, their sedition movements can be seen. In fact, a month ago a group of Mexicans (in haing) obtain. visas for Moscow and in the (Sovier) Embassy they were given? blisy" with as much vodka as they could drink. A good startin get igno Know the country which so "foolishly" hopes to improve to mentally ducky ird who cannot realize the evil they do in supporting thoadho soir inflocion wherever they go. After sccing people come- eviry daylug hc. intossy to gel propaganda we can only think that their work is (valic). Thursday; 21 July:. Tochy at 1045 Sr. Valentin (LOGINOV pr. KUGHEROV) came in to mid the colophone and asked soncone to wait for hin at Constal Cano 32, and as he was about to hany up he stressed that they be alre to wall for him at 7:30 pm. After talking to whoever it was, he asked m. lo send him, at the same address on General Cano, two case of quinine wirer and gingerale by 7 pm, without fail, I delivered then in perse and took them into the kitchen and I noticed that the house wes being repriend and that they were getting ready for oompany, since there were sir nil iptiles of liquor there. (COMMENT: No Soviets live at General Cano 32, NIKTIIN llees at General Leon 32 and, --- ## Page 165 2 5 JulJ.10 Note: These are traces from the Linnvoy Listering • Fost on. Inguinov, whe Is or Lirand and Literpo/e. Sil! Files valertin LotINer (9-1, 712) --- ## Page 166 з АдРобУ 10460063 6 80p.63 12 Bop.65 13 воро65 37 Sepo65 6 00to65 l'onlesos VILINDI S. UT: TOV: Lonlo111os Tainclo Intima llol Aerodiindo cosa faster siertorio on tuncinco do Vloo CAnonl Aido Chovrolet Iopalà 10101065 plucas Da935 (datos de Die 1965) De sabano coafirran es lligado tropodento de Hogol es os malo de loe 23110 hrse JORGE ROSAS PErOs do CoRañO do Attoo1aso Precunto por VOlIRoY poriuo guiero abor quo hados sobró la llegia del Bollot teruninno quo asculaunto están on Venasola, poro 1105an ADILINDO CURUELO LOnGi? CuCO SuSIA A M COlOga LOQUITOU 7 sonidon quo al tallos iranteno so va a noenostas do viol. yo qun dol quejo de Viaso da Venciola jocon al vuolo do Cubanco y ajus unicananto so lanin bajo la pragontecion do pacaportoa. VAl-DIC de llr Francae lo pluo la docusiontación pura ol CutomidoCo RIDO CASTIL: ShoRAy Otros jare que pueden 1lecar a siondo a tatualar ou sa triverascad vasssoto luction orcorno prorrs do viajos las ricao solieltr vienes (oonstantesante, beta Cujos on Soma forillios os atendido por LOGUIEnY) Fo trullado a reunisiooetol dol Cueryo Counular jars ol JOFO: MIJAS COSMOLI avisa la Ilogoda do 10 daportlatas TUBOSO LAQUINOY Do enenTes de atorios dichos Juendoroso --- ## Page 167 25 008.65 28 008.65 Jo Novos # N0w,63 8 Nov 63 10 NOTOGY 15:N0v.65 17 Nov.65 19 Nov 63 30 Nov 65. IJ En0066 18 ED0,66 linco roboracionis para ir al puorto do Masoeldo, LO atlAndO pOr NENINTO JOSIIS de la Padajada Cubano, quo an Tucatán do encuentras los barcos rusos "thafiro"'y ofros or al que lioy un lestonado por en losión do una oaldora. So reune con CARLOS BLINÇO® JULIO PLATAS do la CiTON... co pone a su disposlosda. Resorvo por cortonla do Aviaclón paonjoo pari la aliano y pAra SUGENIO GORLTTTINE® •¡URIANO GANCIA COnJul Cubano du Nórtes, durorma licidonto dol barco dondo 6o116 LoaloRado VICTOR MOROSHOY MIRIANO QUICIA nucyacento Inioma estado de galud dol reatonado MeRosulovo julás un transadado a la cludad do li6z1oo para dor atendido por lOs dOCBOreS CONCILI" CARDENAS de MérIda. T DI DISO ENILINÃO SORIANO dA MOTICO. Reserva pasalo o cuis para el lesionado MOROSION. ALUCINDRO FRITODAS OFFOCO a SOLIO ANOSURA COnmEl de ranando presentarte a LoGUINoY Procuentomento dol Club Frango lo Lacon cobroe por adondos. 1F'.. Cormala con al Concejoro de Panand InC. JOSE B. CALVO Ine b ¡enas daclaracionne de iu Frecidente puslicadas doy en Exooletor. CA.DIO EMILINNO SCHIANO le Inforsa la alud de en crinero: ruso, a quion posteriorunite ópars do apendicitis. CURLES O NUELLER do la rabilada do Entados Unidos, soldalto la visa jara ou esposa ELdIvE. i RooLaca a su BESIa SCRERRO FLORES que la otra ocasIón que tuó Anidado a su flosta antatieron snos nortemarteanos Lase DO. dIsculpa y 10 15718e 60l0. --- ## Page 168 14-10000 21 E00.66 20 FeD, 66 1А F0D. 66 21 P0D•66 - 22 Feb:66 28 F00.66 10.8130.66 LUCASIO UrUMiTy pado a RITILA do Toolco lloctrodoedidea alistas magnétiena para la erabadora ines de LOQUINOV. Io atonilas por ol DIo SORIANO y operano sl lo de febrero on la Contral sufrurelea. Rosora panojos a Mazatlin. Avids a CONZALEL de Villasmia y comando, quo salo e Contracoalcos a vietlar la cerca dol barco sulde lo coboten con alfino perodia de rise puerto. ExICÍA, Corresporoal de The Neda, de pone do couardo para.... huoer una icundon® Por Indionolonea de PRIJNODKO, LleVard a SARITA ROSSENPIELD $ PIRIA GONZALEZ do Tho Novs Invitaciones para la sacopolón del día 23 en la rebajado. SANTIDO RÍCO de sonrias honerlos Maritiono, Infor a LOGUINOV que los barons maos "Thulonida" y Shelengaldo que en dias pasados ostuvieron cargando en coatzacoalgos; donde estuvo LOGUINOs reiresarán du cuatro diuo não por lo que quiero sabor •al os poalble que un barco yun anlo ol dia 18 oou destino e La Habana secrooo ol 260.8n carcar 5,500 toneladas de unfai LOQUILOV no comprendo coro suu pobiblo oso y orae que ses obro bargo of que venga a onrpora RIco ratipioa que de trata del "Thulonalla" ouyo capitán irioró a STETLER de proytuo que sosten carla para oca foola, y gulero rocorias que debo darso avdeo a la capitanla del Puorto con tres dias do antiolpaelón. FRICKA do InvIta o oonar e su dondolllo y progunta ad ya tiono ?lotos sua popolun para pudor viajar. SALVIDOR VAZ de Reprovintaciones Haritinad qulos acopald • LOQUINOV on su ditino viaje a HasatIan, informa Sonillarono la llogada do don baroon runos al "ortidr y el "Venuedarly" que próstemento llorarín a acupulço, pidiondo que una peraona do la Esbajada ruyo a ese quorto para que sirva de interproto. --- ## Page 169 1d-0d0d з NВ0.60 Hs0.66 y Nwo.66 17 M80.06 29 180: 66 31 Abr:66 21. Ab5.66 82. Abr. 66 29 ADr. 66 26 Abr.66 SALVADUR PAZ Munanento Infensa a LoGUINOY que de Aoapuloe •1 barco que 1loçd neorosta para castos 10,000 dolninos, para cambantiblo, cassoa do puerto y proviolasos. LOGUInoi ditossa que los dará radia el lundo, dunndo rodreso os coreojoro vasto do Veraorus donde datá abundlando al barco "Thuldanido®. ABELANDO CURRELO Cônoul Cubuno, 10 jErita para el proisias laneo a la Farta del lognro. Dó Mazaslda ol Capitás del faroo "Lyra so comunica en riSO Con LOQUINCY roio rente saint em unes so reintra inflana con MOnET FEDOR jum que lo d8 80o. SALVADOR TAI quire noutrarlo loa diaprolofonea ruspeoso al arribo do barços surcaltos e puertoo naolonaios y vor que opinlós "tionen vasedeo sobre on y ros o ustodos cono embajade ruedon tomar cartas on el asunto". E1 DIO JOSE LUIS ALVARIZ GALLOU DO POPUSTRO ENGUTION 1O. roclam haborlo dejado plantado ayer en Cuersavada. 90s8 wis ofroco tivitarlo para su cumploadios ol dia 21, So ruce corro do la reservucianos durarito la permanenta en México del sonor BOITCINKO VIce Tropidente do Insurtos en Mosoi j dono acosparuntos à la conferonotá de Agencios do Viajes. CUNDELO 10 LivItA AL iGUAl que a TArTION& NROSHIHOYy BORNUSITo a la recopotón dol dia 25 en la rabajada de Cube en despedida del LiC, CARLOS GONZALIS PARRODI y OrFANIOOdA POR 98 Cuerpo Consular® COrTIna Con PERCEDES TRIVIÑO do la Aso01a018n Mesionna do Agencias de Viajos, sobro lia aotividados de los delegados rusoa a la onneanalón de furioso en Guodalajara. DEo AMARAL que d1jo ser persoguido polleloo do su pale natal Brasil, pido a LISEINOY esllo deniro do la ecbajada, porque on 1a de cuba de lo dan negado, LOGVINOV roouarda que hay e traiado ++ + --- ## Page 170 3 Hay. 66. 10 1aye66 18 May, 66 19 H8y,66 20 Mey, 66 84 Mạy 66 26 May 66 30 saya66: 100J86066 • y roconlonda Deo lA enDojidO do alEta DETO pOlO LaS1RO • Astrleano. De poso en contucto con ol capitán dol barco "volchoria en verionis y profunta al ya ajaroold ol sartnero ruso. (rootoriomento so supo que dicho martnero habla faltado o u baroo por cuensiones de faldao) EI De JUAN MANUEL FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEL que dijo Dos repu contanto dol Gollerno del rotado de l6xloo, lo colloita vlea. ¿DoUINOY lo invita o quo paso vañaza a la albajado. ERICKA LINENUN InèletO on Bener que documentoe pire poder aprovechar nu viaje a lurojo y vialtar MOsOdo LUGUINOV obrado. hablar con él eubajador al os novesario " por la olmpeste qua 010nt0 107 0118ª: Liana la atorolón al carento de in Agorojo Vagon a Cook porque atoniro que bandon paoaportos para sus visao so pao. : blon roquialtadose CONIOlORAdO pOr KAZANISIV, COMICA aL LID. FENNATO FIORES. TrUnDs do Rulaoloreo Extorloros el cunstanto robo y entrarlo. do plooue on loo cutos diplonatico. DAVIO ORNELAS do Mundos Toures agradeco ol oboogulo de Pollodos y rovintas de la cubajada. SOCORRO PLORES vuUlloa de vien al pasaporto que no siono Cocha de voncimiento, Locuirov manirlesta que solamonto de viese • los pasaportão en rogla y que no lo importo que oos persoen vaye on violte ostolale Heneri jasajos para veracrusi HERTA CONZILVE PADILLA raCIa ol 1noumplinlanto dol contrato do arrendaniento do la cosa en Cuernavaca para ol porsonal do la enbajados --- ## Page 171 0.8517.65 39 Jun 66- 83 Jun. 66 _89 June 66 5 201.66 6 J01.66 7. 301066 19 J01.66 SALVADON PAS DIITA plía lo agulo para obtener lo roproce tación de los baroos ruana que llegan al puerto de Veraoruto _porque de 10018!8 un. Holos en qua dioon que Rusta da a Importar un organanto de tuberlo, MovINoV lo ayudari pero no lo puedon diooudir por toléfono. LI' DIO JOSE LUIS ALVARIL DALLOU del Instituto de Interpretes y produetaro, la pido llovo al proyoctor de alno, "porteo ono cotorno dioras doçoos do vor vio polioulas". GLORIA ALTARO quiere rounirno pare plation con algunos runodonarios de la enhajado, LOGUINOV osta de nouerdo es que. nda al viornus "duspues de Ins olados de incles" Le Buñorta JENNiDE del Instieuto de Interpreteo y Traduos tores, so aviao que oun olouce corto hosta te promin omin De la aconola Morrlu Hormanose Inforn sobro ol choque dos auso Chevrolet Impala placas LInDA Y que robaron al rade. BOOVINOV trasliará lo del onguro en La Provinointo ERICKA LUENUN a su recroço de Puroja dO repOrtOS LOGUINON so reolas que no se despidlo e Informa que olono mon de mes con sue documentos jara quo pane a recogerlos. MORTAN do la leencia Mundos Toure, despune do Bratar pobre Vengo soplana al mal binos de LoGUINov of dle que estuvo en e oasa, puos hasta su familia o solesto. LiGUIROY recoslende lo mo novelas de anor que pollotados porque lo haso proguntae que no puede --_---- contestar. PROgUntO al LIO. MORI PLANCARTI OTIOIAl MayOr de lo Clanra de DijuEndOs, ol BOSITO dol TiaJo a Rusta dol Diputado JESUS RANCHEZ, por podorlo otergar la viale Coationa vioa paro ratados Unidos a nombro do VLADIN SITLANTEY COrTAOpOnDAl ruDO do Imanto en La Habana, setualmonte on Noxico. --- ## Page 172 iIY' Juda66 19. J0l.66 29 5038,66° - 7 = •1 INGO MATUEL ARITA do la Foorntarta do loourado MIdrauloo SO 001101ta la Visa, paro solotire un 0014re00. El Enta jador de Cuba HERNANDEL ARMAS, DAdO DO AyUdO O "US STON ANITO NUCOtTO OL DIO ALFONSO MARTINEY ALVAREZ guÍeN dodo: astatir al Cóngroso No Morobioloçlo on Masod o trotiselvo Ost! AIVIEndo para lOs FOntOJOO dol 26 do Jello on LA Baler a remira pera m camblo de SuprecIonio, LOCUTROV LO esperS. El ILOo LARA PLORES Informa haber cooluido cablo des caba jador JOSS ITURRIALA on dondo ratitton in instacion, DeT tal suttro pollotta la vlog, y podor plosion co l00 Agrocdos Culturaly Conarolal ruoDO. LOQUINOY dar quateso L they on. LA onbajada los pondra on contadto con osas porsonado BOTAs Froovantonento ds bungado LocUINOr on la orbajado jusa,. aln que no enouantro dste.. Juldo 22: 40 1966. --- ## Page 173 14-00000 Tall.:.. SUBJECTE Forture 20 l 1i00T5 +1-2712 75 septerter 1066 manjo",. Subj's hone 910÷9.00. auble office 4 Do Thn C/0 eu 30 sid sent to Sunfla hobe the évenire of 20 Sap for dinner. To astablishe mind ur reirtlinghly with Sury's mife, this arcidin une of. To othere vore present beatre un, and sint and his i not Joln at the dinner tables A bricht toich on the murt of went wan that no wore served the cartor that Pothodho had recently hrought to Subje Subja wife, Fathere La an intelligent end charuine person • She arko wi th emat percention of her expertences in the Soviet Inton, when whe had accrayonded: her hanhand thiert a few years ago, Althrugh Subj has told the C/O thnt his wife doos not knon of the Intelligence relationship brtween them, it apfeared evident to the c/o thet subjls aife conniders the c/o in sore kind of opecinl roletionshin to her hunhard: During the evening subd reported to the C/o sorothine that lillio hid said at their cret on queat, which he had ouitted in repo-ting their mont. In mrinking uhout the for con tracel aconta uttending the IntesT conference in osci in. October isor, milled sinted me are interested that as many travel as cy as rossile duty conortion. maybe've could later on use one of thenut tho roblen with Mr toxicans lu thio- they are vory affble and simmetico, tut when it renches the mint of a strairht proposition, t'ey are all lchickrn."'" 2. On 23 Sent Subj ranorted about the visit of Valentin Loginow to his office on. 21 Septe Tre, went to the nearhy Flor de lexico for coffee. Sibj, "ho had boon Instricted tr move norther re Pavel Yatokov's prorable assimoment when he retime to Mexico didn't have to. Locinow burat nut to Subji. "You have to contrat: late mol on the Concul General," Subj aoked who's sons to be tocinovle sostetant. Ioninoy answered, but Suld does not recall the name. Subj asked' "ihnt Job are you plannine to Sive Tatakoy?" Lostnov saked my de?" Sung sald moutrea big shot". Locinor stated ile'll get a Job, He will be sone Pirat Secretary of sone Depertment,." The reason that Incinoy cane by to. Subj is that he wanta to investlente the shabby treat-ent that had been accorded the delegates to the Miernbloler?cal Congress in loscow (surj had told the c/o that the attendees to the Contress didn't ron Files: CCi 8-2278 P-11712 F8i55. (p.1) 0-541) COPIES MADE P-11112 --- ## Page 174 COFIES MADL love hotel decramil long, lost had to ho pait un 15 leds a? "orere lialsey'ly). loilnor was estar: ll losestinating on conplaint no the lerterna sho ind attendede Subj ailed 16 !...des lo miar lo rite lie spor: do intotet. lerinos le. "No - ligher e to tir "trition of Pourion" nici propered "Hot lọ Inay g: i lj "You are unahle to do arttline now. "pelic mous con recommend cognunús -uton Merlean that world he able later en to mee a Job in the ever dis latinero" /Commente Despite the way hey renated te trowg phratin of thir on, subs sold he had the imenssion that lordron war listine Subj to reconce vurcone mio erald toke Subj's place, "At eny rite, suby had die latter in mimi ven hr arvored lostnov/ Subj replied, "ou have tore contact this have cil lins of people. It's not necessary for re to recomend mortie. to you."" suf chamed fir nubject and asked, "what should I take to the "payo" lot ILTURIO?)?" danov snid "Don't make the some miatake you made lost tire - you brote inctin mut ins mtortals. That's not the custorin cur country. wine sone third lorden but, donon't cont more than tin or three dollorg." 3ó. Subo also n rocd that on 22 Sept he had lunch with fernaida ond ion caldania. siby told the hut utony tire in the not when our ofrice had waked july. for recoirendation? rescare in pover ent, Suby hod iven Saldonin' nree độg thát thuo in the li Fic auranintration Saldanta had rorked no endlet. ca: in do of the Sceretariot or Public Suestion. a •Ir the Sub-Secretortet of Etuentions Hien sube harl to the danto had been instrumental in atting hiton offic emmondan works in the Pran nile Funeunef. the, iT. anc What sung's riftee before her fustand cater or tore en g22cà. fe for lunch). Fernanda told Suby: that more are renese Vinc to True innd a-"tribunal." trice to jet sarancs in prance, but that was turned don t the perch cinernt. there ure: in in lor two neetinga, in lovether in stockicle, ne in "arci, in in viet tat" he lind translated, she started enlar phot has for Batter fare Curati: ). --- ## Page 175 14-00000 3. called l'exicon "ut f vietnin; those furpose it was to rublich the truth about. Vintrun and colirt, rimy to send to Vietna via France. On meekendo the soup visits villagon for lontro proletarias and talke to the workore and perpente. terrarda montion d to Juby that thore ver a grail nicklar cup in the Jealoh coatunity, and sir wited to know shout it so they could join forcess Suhy rold he knew of nio such Til in the Jenian community. men Permanda arked suby to Join the priup and umort it with monoge Suby turned the mopooltion down. lle anda the Viet or torn evictira - they were dues of the Cöruntet oninese and To th lethere to my, emundn called Suba "o hourceouse jabi sold Mul: umo Juan muo not present for the ilogicion, he do sugaloo-cationed main that ho had found out that Unran of yoon Toro and hunger out c) or arca lopes Toura vere definttoly reler te stend thr Raped day! 25415 PIOT COPIES MADE --- ## Page 176 T I then astiod his hoe the purchase of the watches un cooing, alugg. So told no that the borning after our last poettog tanta could have been on 10, Soptembers, " Saturday.: at about 0s50 hol went to the Trade Dolesation building and ached for bio sood intend, out of untchen but nt they ospoct-none soro In 15 days at: hich thee Bubtoot, should come back and sAty will soil pla 91) - he wants. COMMENTS In his noted for 1s september Subjeot's e8y5 that SuNIkoy and cone in to nay that Subjootle sortet frionds, had wanted to -ELve has watch for. 116:501010642/22 I: September but that tho solotal are notlout of then but tant Fee would come ta Isitoon daye)•: leithen reviewed his, notes. Fron now on In not going to reproduce them in todo but only do certain Itens 1a br.01 for since they are tiredone, repotitious and now largoly proven to be pross casseratione plus fabrication. d: General Notes: 11. Soptenber: STRY THOV, toile Subject that ho has to drive the Imbare dor overy Sunday sorning to play Bolt: Then follow Subject a account of thn non eristent party 12:8opt: costIlov comes by at 1143 to offer regrets for not having come to yesterday's party and to say that soviet cyollate will come to roxico for the forthconing wintor olyapics. Later three now soviots who don't spesk Spantsh cone fu. SILNIBOY said that they vlil Zeave (Moxico) soon. (COMIENT probably the two audio techa. 13 Sopto Xt J14S STRIZOV and CORONETS CORd In to sAY thet BiLNIROV had an accident 1n hio caron Marias Nacional that horning (COMRIT" Accident confined by LIENTOY) 14 sops. Tho three nor Soviete came in and brought 1os return to this paradise. Doscription of "stontado" describod abovo. 18 Sopt: Nothing LOGINDY tella bin that ho la noe Consul in place of YArskov. Subdoot ho ia 1o0k1es for s s bedroom house with garden near the Babasey and not nore than 1, 000 HN per Boath. subjeet to look for one. a Septutes c: 15650 P-11712 --- ## Page 177 л. 18: 8opts Subject takes off on bicycle and finds & boure at Avenue 180 with sit bedroons but renting at 5,000. Subjeet suspects tha Lodisoveront 11ko the 3,000 rent nor the laot Chat there is " weant lot next door. 19. 302- LOCINOY comos in at 0930 and Subject describes the bouse •LoGINOY 111 So by to 100k at it: T. Spocial Noton On BILNIKOY 10 Bept (Saturday); SILNIKOV la alone. fron 1045 to 1110. Bays he; STRIZROY and URa COROBETS sill come to party next day attor sooing MAlTOIN Off at sirport. (Both LiLYRiC and LIITED have hin leaving at 1013 in ear and not returning bý, 1400) 81 LNIKOY comes In from 1100 to 1120. i too lots in rave to leave the party a little carly aince Bays Soviets 0111: have they hive to show a fils to the loviet iids in the labissy that. OventOR ORUSTKIN then comes 1n and gays, can't come. Atch 1128 81LH7ROV COROBITE and STRIZKOY ConG In and all to to party, 9L0. 12 SOptL2020 1O 1040 BILNIKOV, COROBITE and TRIZBOY come 1u to thank Bubjoct for the party: 1450 SILNIKOV cores. in alone for a quick tequila. 1510 BILMIROV and STRIZHOY drop by to make Ball purchasee. IS Rept 1130 to 2200 SILNI comeS Te looking for empty 13-Mter Jara. 21510 comes In agains and tells about ilo car scotdent yesterday. 14 Copt: to 200 BILlKOY comes ta and explaian the danage to his car. 1320 to 1635 was In again 16 septS: 1130 to 120S BILNIKOY come 10, 1400 1n agal. 10 Bopt. Hothins. 17 Sopt 1010 BILNIKOY and STRIZHOY cone 1n. 1450 BILAIROY 1n alone 16 Bept: 1100 SILNIKOY and STRIZBOY come 1E: Bublect laviten then home for lunch, They can't because STRIZIY had to diive Ambassador to a conference ith Chilean Asbassador. 1400 BILmInOV in alone. 10 Bept: SILNIKOY Cones in 3 times: 1100 to 1122; 1430 to 1410; 1830 to 1900 with STRIZIOV to ent tacon. 20 Sept: 1400 SILNIKOV, STRIZHOY and GOROBETS drop In for & (CONMENT: AB USUAL LILYRIC and LIMITED do nos support these t1n0s). Trancis J. COIGHS BS CRET --- ## Page 178 1d-0n0d Tho C/O reminded Subj of what he baoienily was In Soriet eyes i an-Sootorn Lurepour serume did a Sure . ind more, he had nover professed to then ary dicolosical smirnety to tho Cromunist enusa. Tho rost he had done maa to declare that the. Soviets sorresented the mave of the futuro, and he vented to ho on the linino dide. But hò nuôt recoiro that such sortinent coming fros a Jew could hardly have convirend the soviets. b) Next star of arproach to Soviets in Xexicot Dio C/O quarated to Surd as in effoctly mar to break off from the Sovieta that he chould too co flotely all arnatime or "criendshare - cut nut tho "asta la morte". bit. Subj, In turning down any and el2 Sortet requeste for Inforiation or antatanor, should couple it with the oren declaration that he hea quit. Subj aurord tn coller thia lino, except for the qualification pertaining to his presence in losers o) Clarity ntatus of Inginov an "Consul"a Subj data that during his rcet with Prikhodko and inciner on & Sontecher 1966 while thoy vero talking abont pavel Yatskov, whon trikhrato sata he had acon in oscon, subj addresacd the folzarine queation to lostnovs men la your boad conine back?" Lostnow repiteda "You're talkins now to the Consul." 3o Tho C/O miahod to clartly or reaffirmhis understandins of Subj'e responso to Prikhoiko on 3 Sentenber when the Soviet asked obout lesalizins a tourlat in Kerdcod Fororted in mragrarh & of the Contact Roport of 6 Sententer), Prat. the C/0 paramrared for Subj the vay he had roportod Subjis reasonias proocee about Brikhodko'a question (son Coment In raragrach 4 of the Contact Peront) - Subs sold that it mas essentially correot. Then tho Co folated the war he had reported Prikhoako's question and Suh'a: "subt sata that that was not exactly how the corversation had taken piece. He restated the conversation as followss Pikhodkor minics tial be the best way to legalize (a tourist in l'erico)? Subject ¿"You know the ansmers." Prikhotkos "If you wild have to put (a man in your office), would you be sble to?" Subject "It moula la difficult necessary to consult Cotercacion, because conrary had to have the required capitalizatio: to place a foreigner 'a from LiC02Y-5 Cried Resort Ilse inal banne ang filed: P-2712 --- ## Page 179 irtes - 1 .,. . file Licalla SUPPENBRE DE 1966 SPOC LAI 33. Lato dia e las 1920 He: Xó tranqitaba por la Aranida Unirareidad, Bobre onta callo y a le altura do Pilaros, ao ao inauentra un Cats que llova por nombro: " IPOCAPO", en dicho lugar obsorre que al intertor so oncontra- ba LOG platleando con una nuior bon tipo do latina, la pillación ão 1a. mujer manolonala, os aproximadamento la alguientes Bad 20 o 30 añoa, altura 1.5ố n., comploción Icoramonto grudáa, plol morona, cabello nogro y rizado, cara redonda, ojos darse, , narla ancha, boes rogular de labion truesos. Esta mujar routla de color vardo 8000. --- ## Page 180 CONTACT REPORT SUBJECT: DATE OF NESTING: 8 September Ï966 I met with Subject at his office ön 8 September 1966 from 1730 to 1800. Next meeting is in about two weeks to be arranged by phone. reported. that LoINOv still comes fairly. regularly to the French Club on weekends. Occastonally he brings hts wife. Once of twice he brought two young soviet men in thetr early twenties. He has also brought & Soviet woman ca 25 who has played tennis with two other women. (club membere whom Subject doesn't know. Subject hasn't seen GORLITSYN since 3: Bince LOGINOY doesn't play tennds but only alta around outside or in the bar, subject doesn't see hin for sustained: periods Subject has seen LOGINOV talking to BARMIENTO or his wite two or three times. From observing bim in the bar, • Subjeet saw that LOCINOV 1s on speaking teres with several members. I asked Subject 1p he knew Ofella ALPARO Lopez (P-11339), a good friend of the SArMIENTOs and also in contact with the Soviets. To didnt recontrother name an a club member rathen I told him that she teaches at the School of Economics, remembered that at a dinner party at the home of Henry *STECHANN, an American and local head Of Continental 011 Co., a Mexican woman was present who was a professor of Economics. She: speaks excellent Engltsh and to In her thirties. ALFAno but 1s not gured He thinks this-la He will check his wife who is the name renenberer In the family. 367573132 Subject remarked that he found the above dinner strange for its odd mixture of solid busdaess, types and a few off-beat Por the next meeting Subject will attempt to confir ALFARO's identity and also to spot likely club membere who appear to be in close terms with the SARMIENTOs with the view of setting an assesament of the latter. subject is interested and willing. However, he does not appear to be very much interested in people. Thus he baa played tennis with SARMIENTO for years and hasn't a thing to say about hin except that. he 19 a pleasant tennis companion. Similarly SARMIENTO's. wife is good looking and & good tennis player. 8. I haven't had an opportunity to talk to Subject's wife yet because Subject says that she does not know the SARMIENTOS. I met his wife last fall and noted that she is much more alert, interested and lively in social relations than he 1s. Therefore I bet that she knows a lot more than he gives her credit for. I Intend to invite them to dinner soon in order to talk with the wife and explore possibilities. FILE: P-12330 P-11713 Paul Dillon p11163 P11339: P-12703 --- ## Page 181 SUIJECTE Lister.le Alice. Contact licyor/ LIC0275 - 2-2.712. 7jept, a fer ainutes; Sears Ejorolto Noional a Sent, 11001200, subj'a office O September 1966 3. On 7. Sept at ábout 1100 the C/O made a routine call to Subj'o orrice to deteruine If. Suby would be available that day.. Juby responded that he was clad that the c/o hod called because he had to nog him ursontly. In pharaoteriotió manner Subj trying doublotalk told the c/o that he had recelved a telegram. that his old friend (irikbors) was back, and that he wes coins to see the "two of them" (Prikhodko and logirior) at 2500 that day at the for de Moxloo. The C/Q was mizzled by the reference to the colesal, and askod incredulously if the telegram had anythine to do with sottins up the meeting with his friende. Subfle anever was ambiguous, and the C/O lot it 8o at that because he arranged a kriof neet with Subj for 1230 at Seers Restaurant: st Ejeroito Nacional, whore Subj was to be on his own buginess at that tire. 2. lovertheless, in considering the briefing instruction to alve to Subj the C/o hod to alic for the fact that there mlent havo been apecial circuntancos in the sovlote! arranpetent for their meet with subf. further, thia was Brikhodko!s firet ucet with Subj after return fron Moscow, where it is presumed he had taken up Sub'a crue with hs superioro and the line decided on how to deal in the ruture with their ringing, non-cooperative "acent." A reasonable ocntisoney expectation was that the Sovlets nicht have a "hot" proposition to moke to Suble and the c/o decided to brief. Subj to the ritent that if the Soviets broached a really important operational assimmont, which Subf was. to judgy, Subj would onduct himalf so as to draw out the Soviets but stall on acceptance. If nothing of overriding importan come from tha Soviota, Suby was to continue hio"friende-yes, work-no" atance At 1230 the C/o say Subj for Juet a few minutes, during whioh the tolostan was explaineds it mas from Moscon, Inviting Subj'o travel agenoy to pirticipite In a deminar in Norcon 24-29 Oot 1966, detailed letter to follow. Further, Subj had leamed from Prikhodko then the latter had called earlier in the noming to make the appointment for the meet that aftermoon that Brikhoako was avare of the Invitation and would talk to subj about if at their meet. the c/o imparted to subs the briefing outlined above, stressing that Subj must Judge whother the Sovlota were proposing something that was so important that he couldn't dierios It out of hand - In rhioh case he ves to be non-comittal and stall on a decicion 3o. The Co had communicated to the Station the tack he was going to take, and. "as later inforned by the Station" to reverse the planning of Subj'e attitude toward • contingenoy propoaition of the Sovieta to a flat, unconditional "no." File: re f11702 5-2270 P-855 (pa). P-7447(p2) ted is simone coo --- ## Page 182 14-00000 2. Accordin'ly, the C/O tried to reach Subj at hia office. Subj wis not thore so the 6/0 left a neesaso, to be civen to Suby 1f he should arrive dofore 1500. Sho sessage vase "En el negoclo con sus alg08 deberte uated deolr "no! a todo i The messase rurported to one fron "Seler Bergor." " In i telephone call to sulf at 1600 that ovening the C/o lonrned Aron Subig. that nothing of trangeending importance had occurred at hie neet with the Sortete, and so tho c/o arranged to meet with Subf the following day B September once mee 4o. On a Sept Subj renorted that he had set Pikhodko and lostnov at 1500 the . receding day in the Flor de Nexico Restaurant, Pikhodko did most of the talling. Ho brought Subj the two kilos of cavier that Subf had requested (and paid for). and with the Miniatry of forelin Affairs) who sent hio reparda to Subj and aloo, rout Fussion recorde.. He had scen Pavel Yatakoy In Moscow who told him that he had not •Subj in Paris, Yatskov would be retumins to Moxico about 17 Septemher 1966. sisher Prikaddko of Lasinoy toid Subf that Lostror was now the Soviot Consul in Mexioo. liginoy told Subj that he would pans by Subl'g offioe on Monday (12 Sept) - Thoy discissed the invitation to the travel afonta to come to Moicon. Trikhodko. bald that twelve TUTiRIST representatives in hextoo had been Invited, that ho had the toleram and that ho was going to coordinate the arrandomenta for the travel agente to artend the conference, /Comante The telegram sent to Subj in Spondeh on 6 September 1966 snide "there will be a conference 24- 29 Dotober In Moscow of travel agencies that collaborate with nrast dealing with international trurtar; ve Invite your aceneri a reduced metce for the stay will be afforded a detailed Lottor follorse"/ Pikhodko asted Subd if he thought of attending the onference, Suby nata ho would like to 80 (and added "ith a twinklo) "only from à huainese sturdroint." Irikhodko, for his part, in thin reference to Subj's uncooperative itti tule 7sald that Subjhad put ble into a hard spot with hia auperdors in Mogcon. And now. no would have to consult with Moscon to see whether Suby can attend the travel acent conference. Subj asked archly "Hy letter?" Prikhodko replied "You're crazy? overy thing goes by cable." Subf stated "You cen refuse me a vloa." Prikhoako dismosed that, saying that it Subj soos to Moscow he will he meet Prikrodko'a collearuos, and that if Subj is in hosce the doctors there would be happy to chook into Subj's health (a matter menticned previoualy with both Loginow and Prikhodko)e: Subj, responding sonewhat sockingly to thia expression of concerta by the Soviets, said he was etill their friend"and one of them. --- ## Page 183 30 Mikiniso then remarked sonothine to tho offect that subj now dida & vant to do anything for thon what with his bad health and being tied up in miness -but that rayho la tho future..es and then got very much into the present ey a11dtnr canilo into tho old crooves he gaid "I talked/you several times sout a man coming touriat to laxtoo - what 1o the beat was to arrange legal muldence could 1t he done throuch jour offloo - ho could be attached to your office he docan't have to work there /Commente Subs explatned to the C/o that ho sensod tho trap immediately, recosniains that this was the old bent of the Soviets on which he had furiahed a wealth of Information in the past. Suby reasoned that if the Soviete were fishing with the old bait, he would not flae to 1t ensorly because in view of his recent noos cooperative behavior it would only confirn to the Soviets that he was bejas controlled (by the MIS) Me would not reject the inainuation of hio cooperation out of hand and categorically, because that rould not be conglotent with bis pasture ôf ronatning on crendly toruo vith the Sovieta. Merofore he took the middle road, that of being non-comittal or unoonitted, where the initiative of connliancé was always in hia hands Parinthetically, Suby told the c/o that if the policy is that of complete rajortion of the Sovieta he should not have even set them; but following the policy of "hanta la morte- amos, pero hacer nada" he felt de vas doing the richt thing In stringing them along a barren path. Thus, without batting in eye he simply repeated what he had already told thom./ Subf satd he would have to confult Goboracin bocause he didn't know lf his company had the muuired capitalization to placo à foreimer in a Job - but thie being l'exico, arrains could probably bo dong. /Commonts Subj remarked to the C/O at this point that she Soviete could not seriougly connider uning Subj'o Cira to "lecalito" their son, because. It rould be a patont fraud to the omployeen in hia lew, and he dia not think the Soviets vere stupid about such thing. The C/o's surmary comment to Subj'e unspoken plea for critiotsn or his ccurse of action was that under the concopt of a "friends, yest work, no" policy terard: the soviets he was doine e fine fob of walking the tightrope. The C/o asked Subj If there had boon any travel arrangements for nor sortets to the Soviet Union. Suny replied that Jullo Rothengtreich, whom Subj cheracterized as a Germen Jen, and his nife, a Russian Jew, had Jeft 5 Sept to New York en risto to the Soviet Union. Subj eald Rothenstretch had told him that he was triestraith the Soviet Ambassador in Mexieo and represented "Pussian firing" (810). Ea tas to reriain in the Soviet Union-15 daya and visit a few cities, Rescon, Kiev and fulfid and then sone cities in Europe, Vienna and Paris! Jubf said that Rothenstrich's --- ## Page 184 11.00000 own fira was baking tho hotol reservations in the Soviet Union for hia. Subg'sald ho had net onco hefore with Rothenstreich years noo, but didn't know anything about Subs aldo rentired a midonor in hia mistleo, David Nosofaky, who loft for the sovlot Union or 1 Sape - josufany lau a brother In Mei. the c/o had noticed a now face among subj's employees and aaked Subd who the Stri was. Subf explained that he had taken on the new fart, the daustitor it one of subja quidas in loxtoo, as possible replacorient for who hau an offer to work for the Israell Subsy In lexioo. Subf sadd Tie would not want to love _becauge, even though she le a elon worker, she 1s conable and aldo a nice Girl TEL pould Leave. would take over her work. (which includes the responsibility for non Soviet travel to the Soviet Union)e To The c/o questined Subj about hie attitude toard, atterding the travel dent conforence in l'oscow. Subj sald that from a business otandoint he would wont to attend, or 1f not hin perschally sonore frontlo Mom, Like Miriam. Me mao Intorested in InTuiSt buainoss, and folt that he should know what plans INTURIST 1ll be formulatine inesnuch an his competitore will be there. Ho is interested to know what percentage ho dote of riturist buginess.. Ho bolieved that INtISt. would foot 50g of the costs of staying in the Soviet Union during the conference. The c/o askod if Suby knew the other travol asncies that were to be invited.. Of the trelve from Merloo Subj folt that the following were ineluded Carze, Carza Tours, Da Carlo Trura, Mojoa dollo, Cook'o, NexAmerica, Pegaso, Excuratones y Viajeo (SVISA)! American Exrress, and poesibly Autoriajen Intornacionales.. Subj krien the "jefea" of all these. Suby plana to attend the International Congress and Convention Assootation woatine in Isracl on 30 detober 1966. He la considering the poraibility of going to locoy for the travel afont meeting 24-29 Oot and then doing on to Israel. The C/0 told Subj to let him know Prikhodko's resulta re perilsaton for subj to attend the hosoon moating. 8.: Subj requested the C/O to obtaln one cace each as Red, inite and Rouse Frenoi vine, the Most" avatladles CARDIO so on to? --- ## Page 185 14-000n 8 .T. MKHORANDUN FOR THE RECORD: SUBJECT: ircozY-s Meeting vith PRIKHODKO and LoCINoV on? September 1966 LICOZY"S reported that he had a meetins with PRIKHODKO and LOGINOV at 1500 on Y Septembor at a Restaurant in town. 2. LILYIC reports that on y September LOGINY left the Embassy alone' in his ow car at 1403 going north on Tacubaya. PRIKHODED left alone on foot to the east at 1416. returned together in LOGINOV'a car at 1730. Thus LOGINOY picted up PRIKHODKO somewhere and took hin to the LICOZY 3 weating Thia. is not. only a good anti: aurvelllance device but also helps to prevent us associating the tựo: Paul Dillon TILS: P 27127 P- 2270 P-11718 --- ## Page 186 -00c0s files alentin V. langiino Terno "orindesin da les Felejades de la 1. 1. 111. 51. Cruela Cipo Cope Coinchein P-1712 Separ. 6,1946. --- ## Page 187 31.22:30: 1266 1=ac in Paráco 70 Cleo ,?: took. curi -mored to "takos that Guly had arrived id they he, a short sal; about diecancopertial that ratchoy mould be returnirrito Mrico. Pacheco dorantise 1.d0rt 1000 toxico/Ere Sue Mir Estoradio ta dent 40-00i cause coof told bie to and do me fami -8767 miles -585 21221 GU. Prévidariti seen and. erotiti of nore. travel; ho 2L: "... agree -bă Solen orino? had autra nt soro ra ranketch de sung's. office, id asked sung if thero had 1o1 tar Soviots an his carloyees, Sukg said he knew Gic accented the ho already nees that Armicing handled Soviet 31. nandios misoriod travot to tho Sovict Union -rint asked mis (otos Subj. baa a f47r on Canuclas, .13 da not unt at that tize to enla dog Ornucla's cucationo rearacting both coplarcos, and said re pould as a luton deto - ervero es ronson triat no mantid dala Lone but the Sovieta.) me facts anchord on bach ro rera: com did shout 5 yeare, Suba acquired Pette rod arother one creatont in tarleso. subd curld homo bit mered. was "Cott and other diees "Do the ridit." "isn' 3. is nories, Cathy brom data, Chised Martas had merced for 0ssr:le5.11 t.:o ¿one Farla Dude, detor chich she santica lot digos to Subje tiat Varia is me Jantat a mirdod, and iriterson interestos in 10 rie: ais 8/0 munirded jubs tie do is contactod to the dorioss he mintains mis none?: stance rit: then. Subs sodded a rockent 22: 1-2712. 117, --- ## Page 188 SECRET Concerning the big inj, 21 Aufust, Subjoet had tho follorina to say in ridition to the irforration in his notes. This AriOratiC" los 12, 205p0.s0 to my questions : 2. They loft the stoic at ca 1110 and stopped off to got: sarbecued chicken (Coilinit: clicy didn't actually airive at LICOll's until 1507.! b. They wont ti a blue Station vagon (COSENT: this is 1? DA): The Soriots léit at ca 1800 (COMMENT: correct) scsices riCon and his wife and the two Soviets, only LICORL's daughtor and son-in-law were present. Later on in the rocting Subject volunteered the infonation that StilliV has coid him that ho had obtained painission to:cord to bicor's hore (cornrit: Strange conduct for soncore tir a playing the port.of a case ficer.) a1s0 volunta he lad told SILNIKOV ti LOGINOV had: called a girl fro. iro Saturday (See Subject Is notes for 20 August. CLIKOV'S lcaction was one. of approval • Toting thật LOGISON wES ingcholor now. I asked Subjcet. Il he didn't think his seaterert abit indiscreot since he could have burned , espocially since SILNIKOV' has now shown an intcrest in socurity norsures. He said I was right but it was obvious that his ispot cidn't bother him in the least either before or after my question. T.: I astcd Subject what lo trought about SILNIKOV's crratic banavior accut vantans ronen, pornographic matcrial, etc. in that he raiso's and cross the subicct without any sense. of continuity. Subject answered this by proposing that ve send a girl under our corrol to vost iis score and he would introduce her to SIL KOY 100% wactly wat we are trying to do with Linustic-li I pointed out thrt such a girl" rould have to live in the neighbor- hood or hor szosence in the store vould be suspect. He then said that tho firl: could bo invitce to his home at a time when r SILVIKOV Tas trores Subject would introduce her as a friend frog Jalisco and lot nature tale its course. I told him that his idea has basic recit but could be quite disficult to implement in a'securó I roharked that it was a shame that he.had been unable He said chess soco we wich suitable candidates in his neighborhood. bat 10Л! surable friends in the neighborhood chat norc nuitable since they weren't the types to thon te could custest such an but re could:, idea. I told him that he couldn't no would spot suitable candidates. Licoul Contact Repart 23 August 1966 --- ## Page 189 and that his "mayoo" was juat a uny of loaning Loptnor. sudy thon araorted to the C/0 that he felt strong in his capaclty to deal with the sandeto, and that his joking remaris ln noo uay vitlated that strengen.. The co brought up the matter of subja hung told /toginoo his personal documents to loginov, and (solely with the deston of reaching for subj's motivel stated that we thought it would be betterly suby did nothing to pass these ducurants to une soviots and hold them off indefinitely: apreäred a dlt chagrined. at the C/O's request, and told the C/O uhy: -ha. manted to glue those mastards" his documents to show them he had nothing to Alde, and that he was not afraid of them; uf he didn't give over his documenta they right thinh they had sometring on him. furtror he: felt that le uag buying Insurance by handing them over openly, and gave as on example that he might be flying in Europe and might find himself dlverted or force-landed ln'a place like praque or Narsaw.- and it would be a comfort to him to know that he fithing to be afrald of concerning any trregularittes in his pasts merefore, subf asked the C/o to chech ülth his "bogges" to see if re could the go chead on handing over his documents: subf sald ly the answer le no! he ulll comply, but his pleading to the C/O appeared as of subj thought hla mas the ulger course: /comment: Desplte the C/Org matrod of challenging subf on spectfics; like the "maybe" and the passing of the documents, the c/org ow opinion 19 that subj has achloved a very satisfactory status in his dealings wth the Sbutate, satlofactory In the sense that it is in accord with the station's objectives in the case and equally important that it can be maintained Decause li lạ conslatent ulth subj's parsonality and outlook 7... subj expressed a desire for another get-together with the C/O and his wife. The C/0 explained that. his.ulfe would do leaving dexico by mid-tomary - and SiDl, who doesn't need any pictures to be draun for him, Immedtately hazarded the opinion that that meant that the C/O would be leaving nat too long after. The C/O acknowledged this possibillty, but said he had ro idea of when it would take place. suby wanted to know if there would de someone to take the C/O'a place when the tima came, and the C/O anowered that of course there would. The time for the get-together is leff for some indefinite date before the c/or nife departe PPAU COPIES MADE --- ## Page 190 1d-in thon SECRET 14 inconver 1005 MMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Carlos BLANCO Solano (P-9328). SOURCE: LITEPO-19. to cod a is pater four report to bet shed anyon requirement: "Carlos BLANCO worke in the judicial police as a confident of Carlos. CASAMADRID (P»10968) : •Barlier he' vorked 1n the DPS and later worked with Carlos MADRAZO (P-3193) in tbe pRI. When MADRAZO left the PRI BLANCO continued as his aide. Inter he went to work with CASAMADRID.. nett alone but was annised to the socialecenter, In the: D'S he never porked on foregnore. I met his last Saturdar: (COMMENT: evidentally 1a responao to our requirement, which source received on 9 December). He sald that he tea friend of (Vindinir) LOGINOV of the soviet embassy and he had one of LOQINOV's carde. Attached 1e BLANCO's card. I will subalt s photo inter. CASAMADRID's office number 1f 10 93-98. A .. Br. BANTOS of the Amerioan Embassy. " Source mubmitted BLANCO'e car: the back is eritten Atenor Sale # 110-%, Col. Naryate (BLANCO's home address) and the telophone numbera 10-33-62 (CASAMADRIDe offico) and 28-5740 to leave messages) " Evidently, BLANCO does not have a home phone. The street, Atonor sale de not in the 1965 plan of the Federal Distriot. TILE: p:9328 болта) Paul Dillon "Pw8Ÿ56 P-5193 P-10968 SECRET --- ## Page 191 1d-0d0d Alton SeTT White o Alice. 19 Dacember 1906 STEECT: coritact sapors/ IIC02Y5+ f-7712 .13 Dec 1930-2000, Hotel Rafornia The C/0 arranged to dellvar some liquor to subj at the time he was rosting an Alr France cocktall. at the Hotel Pajorma. After. the liquor vas tranuferred to subj's car in à neardy. parking lot, suby recounted to thec/o the story of a oisit he had had from Valast log inou that day. 2. subf reported thet, Loginoo come to his office unannounced and provalled on subj to step down to the street to have a coffee witr rim. Loginod presented suby with four bottles of voake for Christmes, and then started to oat subs some personal questions 1) Mou had subj left Polond (after wit) for farls- had lils documentation been legal or filegal. subj answered that it was legal. 2) •How was he able to enter faris- did he have a valla French ulso. said he did. How long ald he stay in faris. • subj said. a few months. - 3) Bus he released from service with the (Polesh) UB? sibj.sald.y0g.- Moro. there any conditions to this releass. subj sald no. Hard was he supposad to de contacted by the foles. suby said yes; and related the story of how he uno contacted in Mexico (in Aarch 1955) by a Folläh diplomatic courler who brought. a latter from subj's old boss in the UB, Stanchuk (phonetic), and how subj answered that letter.. /Comment:. Believe the story given in some detail tr debriefing of suby on his experiences in. UB and waII. Loginou wanted to krow 11. subj'3. response to Poles had been, positive or neyative. subj sald it had been nautral. Asked-why, subf replied that he belteved that eighty parcent of the foles were ariti soviet. Loginow said. "You are right." 4) :Loginov asked subj how he was getting along witr tre Amerloan alrlineg he deals with. suby sald "fine", and asked why. Logtrov sald that mybe, if sub'j has the chance, he can learn the name of " the airector of the CIA in Mexico". subj told loginow he was crazy, or couldn't be serlous; he. couldn't get that information loginov asked subj if he could, would he tell the Solets. suby gaid to Loginou that he would show loginov the documents that bach up his answers to loginous questions, but thet he was busy through Christmas, but could possibly see him after Christmas and before New Years. ?. The C/o asked sucy he had Inquired of logtnow why the latter was asking such question. sudy sald. he did not, even though he mas complately purried by this tach on the port of the soulets. But sub" felt perfectly at ease in telling. the truth to the sbolets, and had no hesitation in showing them his documentatton The C/o told suoy that we would discuss this matter firther at leelisy File CC. P-11712 PRI COPIES MADE --- ## Page 192 14-00000 SECRET CONTACT REPORT SUBJECT: DATE OP MEETING: LICOUL 13 Decouber 1066 and Melchor Ocampo lastod untll: 1515. Christass bonun: for 1966. Next meeting te for Tuesday, 3 January 1967 at 1500 at the same place. subjeet started out by showing me A ploces of paper he had picked up near the incinerator. They wore worthless and I later told hin not to attompt to pick up any more paper aince it is not worth the risk. I then roviewed the SGSWIri examination with him; I-told him that because of his lies and esasterations, none of his peevioud Information us considered valid and that rather than "being sore useful tous" his material had meant a lot of nork for nothing. I told him that. I would give him another chance and that we sere starting a new operation. Throughout uy talk he was quite un comfortable. He did not try to defond hingelf but simply agreed to whatever I said. Although he thanked ne for the second chance he did not appear to be too 'contrite. 4. Following are the few interesting itens fron hid potes On 12 December at ca 1700 KORMUSHKIN came in with another Soviet. KORWUSHKIN asked Subject when ho was going to invite bin to his home for a drink. Subject suggested Sunday, 18 Decenber They agreed to meet at the store at 1500. Subject described the other Soviet an a young diplount ca 29 30 with i thin build gho comes in only soldom. He was a friend of Oleg NECHIPORKNIO (vis already here when NECHIPORENKO Vas here) and vent to the flesta at subject's home watch was attended by NECRIPORANKO and KOSTIKOY and wives "OINT: I remember a report on this flesta but can't find it amyhero). Subject asked no for instructions, dinner, girla. ete? "told him to to along with it have then to bie house without other quests and offer thon only liquor and snacks. Subject is to doternine HORNUSHKIN's motive in asking hinself to Subject's: hant so song he he ray Set hit red london very Bette On 6. December LOGINOV camo ta from 1230 to 1242. had previously asked Subject about helping the Soviets to find a house for thelr school. This time he asked about the now (LILYRIC) building - how much an apartment costs (1500 MN), who lives there (chemical engineer In penthouse (LILTRIC), & Gorman fanily on the second floor, etc. LOGINOV's questions vere general and so vere Subject's answers. On Saturday 3 December 1966 SILNIKOV came in from 1412 He asked for tuo receipts of ca 3 IN each for bread, saying that he had lost the real ones. notect uninks no uses these sna. Bums to buy beer and girlie magarines. TINTY then leated throu a girlie sagazine and then said he vants Subject to find his a girl for whose favore ho is willing to pay 100 MN. (COMMENT: chiseling 10 MN In. false receipts and in the next breath offering 100 uN for & girl?) FILE: P-8764 $ 11707 po 11712 p-6414 --- ## Page 193 Concorning the tolephone call of 8 Decenher 1960 from Carlos BLANCO to Valentin B, LOOTV at the Sovlet Babassy 1n whIch BLANCO told LoCiOV that "*i' conndanto Carlos" (Carlos CABARADRID Mirando vanted to see Pavel A" YATSKOV.on an urgent matter, the folloving infomation may pertain to this diécussion on 11 october 1863 at 2200 hours Pavol A, YATSHOV as soon'having dinner vith an untdentified Mexican sale at the "Lo Tablita" Bostaurant on the corner of Sjercito Racional and Gutenborg: At tho end of thetr peal the Poxican pushed a sail objoct seross the table towirda YATSKOY. YATBROY Covered thie objeat with his napkin and then put the objoct in his pocket. It cas obvious that this object was passed in a clandestino They, thon left the restaurant. logothor and separated. Tbo Moxican thon rent to a joop with Dr liconso 11-63 (1964 1965 tenue) and drove off. alono. This jeep had n seal reading "Procuradurla' Conoral de Justiola del Diotrito y Torritorios Pederalos - Pollela Judicial'" Thus, 1t cas be assured that tho porcon la-as exployee of the Judictal Police, The undentified Maxican malo ma described sa about 35 gor old about 170 es tall, 70 kilos In wolght, slight ië is noted that both Carlos CABAMADRID and Carlos BLANCo are slater in apparace to the above described porson: Carton CABANADRID. Miranda called Oleg M. WICHIFORKNKO at the soviet Fabany on 10 March 2863 and on 16 Marce 1965. On 10 March 1965 CABANAriD called to confira dinner with: PORn the can day On to March 1005 WICHI POREO vee not 1n. Carlos BlANCO Called Valentin &. LOGINOV on 1 November 1065 and 10 Novenber 1086. "" addition Graciela soto (a Priond 'OS BLANCORS) Called LOGINOV on behal? of BLABCO on 3 Soptenber 1960 and 0 Novonber 1000. AtT of the above calls vore to arrante • social notings botroen BLANCO and LoGInOY. All of the above inned Solete are KGb officor LOGINDY took the place of NECHIPORENKO when MICHI PORERIO 102t Mexico. LOGINOY arrived in Mexico on 3 August 1905. According to the colephone convorsation he was already a good friond of BLANCO"s on 1 Noveabor 1965. Thus It would appear that LoOKoV VILE: F885 P7412 P10968 P11712 P-3694 p-9328 Dis: firama (Madonnoy), 5 Dec966 --- ## Page 194 VAN PUE SORO COntACT EACh BLATCO bY aRothor BovIot, probably NECHI PORENSO OF YATSLOY. It is interesting to note that,although CASANADBID Ban boon ta contact vito NECHIPORENKO and BLANCO hAn been ta contact vith looty, ; thoro: 1e so pervious: indication that either nee YATSOV, YATSOV la the kch onlo! of both. -B. Attached ta a COpy Of a memorandu conceralag LOOINDY. --- ## Page 195 14-00000 1. In July 1966 whon you and Gorty Wit Slacissiar Carlos CABANADRID bs a possiblo choico for tho porson to ind a nooting with Pavol YATSHOV nt "La Tablita" rostrurant in Ootobor 1903, you told Goorco that CASAMADRID'E naplotent man of confidence; NU, fittod the doscription of tie porcon even better than CASAMADRID did. •*.: What :1e the name of tale porson und his official titlo? Be what are his business and hone addrosson and tolophones? o.; Can you provide us with a photo of htm... d. Can you sivo un a rosuno of his profossional rareor and en evaluation of him as a porson? Do you know & An ta pereas above. CRU SLANCO WhO WOrka Math CASALDRED. DotailE Des quis Pitemptir (9 De21965) c0 50-6-91/4 CC: Carls BLANCO CP- 9328 Parce YATS RON CP- 873 LOGUINOR CP- 11712 --- ## Page 196 4.0=8e.! El Cónsul de Monaco Ofrecio una Recepción •LUOMELA VASILIEVA, Galia Soloviena: Kienia Barretel, consul.de Молясь у? kina y Galina. Valentina S. Loguinov.y señor schora. esposa. frole Garza Noble) En la residencia del cinsul Barele: Finge fune, & deli. Cionzalez. Pariode s; sonnra, da: URSS. el. setior Ahelard ip Monano. "en las Lomas;de, Chamiltepri. se. ofrpio crusce pocacillee Puergn. sel;= don this de Curhelo, 'los"- corisules: de. grané e lae muchiginvirados sennia. "Gristain Cognio Francia. Sillza, Erador, Es dictel para.rlehrar.o. hesta: Fontio, inej asistentes se fi. Thiecas don Agustin Salvat sados linidna, Grecia. Hattl nacinnial. Centil anfitrione; contrahan Alleran de Rasenz. tue là discinguida senoia de si erg Diaz' g señors. ' Carlos schole. les entaladcies de Islandia, Marmeros. Nicaia: Francia, Grecia, Haiti, Hoian- SIGLE EN LA FAGIA DUS Ex celsior 22 Wor 66 11?17 --- ## Page 197 -00000 BECRET CONTACT REPORT SUBJECT: DATE OF MEETING: 21 November 1968 picked Subject up at the corner of Nilo and Melchor Ocampo at 1100 ön 21 November 196G. The mocting was hold in my car on a side strict and lasted: 50 minutos. paid subjcot 900 MN; his salary for November 1966. Next meeting is for 1100 on December at the above place. Subject will be given an SGSWIRL examination at this meeting. Subject didn't have a word to say about LOGINOV's attempt to recruit him. When I asked about it, he said he thinks that LOGINOV is out of town since he hasn't scen. LOGINOV since. his Jast mecting. with me. His "notes for 17 November say that at 1210 Yurly. (ISAYEV) camc in with another "diplomat" and both bought cigarcttes: ISAYEV told Subject (apparently out of the blục) that LOGINOV had been very busy and therefore hadn't been able. to sce subject ISAYEV then added Subject shouldn't forget about what LOGINOY had asked him.: Subject answered that he didn't ISAYEV simply Good, he will come to see you) would be di-cussing LOGINOV's business with him. • Subject had no that they are connected professionally 1-11712 --- ## Page 198 CONTACT REPORT SUBJECT: DATE IS MEETING: LICORI -1 10 November 1966 I picked Subject up on the corner of Nazas and Melchor Ocampo at 1100 10 Noverber. The meeting was held in my car did lasted an hour. Next meeting is for 21 November at 1100. 2. subject started things out by saving that LOGINOy 18 tryin. to rocruit him to report on LIE:PTY-6.. Roview of his notes and d' scussion revealed the following:. On 5 November LOGINOV cano . Subject told him he had found a house on Juanacatlan. LOGINEV said that he's looking for oncön the Chapultapec Park •Sie ^& Talz. Tacubayz and for. Subject to keep looking. V. said. that he rould like to rent an apartment at P.A. de Santos 104- Subject told him they arc all occupied. LOGINUV said Subject must know those apartments well. admitted that he did and besan to sketch them buTLOGINOV didn°t seem to be interested in his efforts.' LOGINOV then asked. how many apartments there were in the building. 16. Subject answered, LOGINOV then said that since Subject knows the apartments so well he must also know the people who live there. Subject admitted that he did. At this point some other Soviets came in and the conversation ras torminated. On 6 November LOGINOV dropped by for some small talkand left some Soviet chocolate (which Subject showed ne) for Subject's grandchild. On 9 November LOGINOV, came in at 1230 and asked. Subject to go to a restaurant: with him: Subject countered by saying his wife was home sick and he had no one to leave the store with. Subject then invited LOGINOV to his house but LOGINOV insisted on a restaurant. Subject agréed to go on 12 or 13 November. •From the above Subject concludes that LOGINOY wants to recruit him to report. on LIENPTY-6 (whó lives in P.A. de los Santos I asked why LOGINOV would be interested in LIENPTY 6 (there is nothing about him in the notes). Subject answered. that hẹ finds LIENPTY-6. very suspicious because in the 5 years that he has known him, Subject doesn't know what he does lIving. He thinks he writes novels. In any case he is home all day long. In additión, he lies. He told Subject the new (LILYRIC) building. He is also eccentric. Besides his windows face 17. on the Embassy. The apartment directly below his, number 13, (probably LILYRIC) 1s empty. the owner having LOGINOV in mind. owner said that the apartment had been rented by LI EMPTY-6 which Subject also finds surprising. The whole theme was that he is suspicious of LIElPTY6 and that LOGINOV wants to recruit him to All of the above on LIEWPTY-6 and his apartment was verbal. There was not a word about hin In his notes. I told Subject that. 11 LOGINOV tries to recruit him 10r any purpose, he is to cut hin short and to indignantly refuse. He 1s:8150 to tOll LOGINUY that SILNIKOV had tried the sano thing two months ago. P-11'112 --- ## Page 199 1d-0d0 LICOTLl Contaet Report 1 November 1008 He 1e 38-30 years old, married and has worked for Nicolas for 2 or 3. joars. (COMMENT: Colonta Pensil Is in the western part of Tacuba and is full of lagos, but nothing anywboro near Lago Cont):: I told Subject to go abend and Ket no the information on Nicolas INU anyway, His notes on this are in the entry. loi 26 october. :5. With thia SubJect ran out of volunteored information and attacked his notos which contained the following tea worthy of note : . .. On li October LOGINOV eine in and asked Subject to koep looking for a houge. near the Embassy.. He said they want it for a school to which the children can walk since driving then back and forth to the present sebool in proving cumberione. He nieo sursented that Subject sign the rental contract since many people are unwilling to rent to Sovlets. When I expressed surprise about Subject signing a contraot for 5,000 pesos a month he said that ho had done it bofore for a Soviet Colonel in 1953 (the year Stalin died) This bouse was at Chicontepec 70 and sented for 4,000 pesos. (COMENT; That subject could sign a contract for 5,000 posos a month is ridioulous. That the soviets, are lookins for a not bobool Just altor novtng tnto the m one 1s strango): PI1112 --- ## Page 200 14-000 • . usual effervescent self, asked Immediatoly If I had gotten the capers ho left for me, sinted that he had decided to go to Moscow, rattled off his schedule, gave Le the names of the only other two travel agents be new were going, repeated several times he'd be happy TIDE CARDED to give me a report when ne returned, and asked, as 1f.. he hoped I didn't, it there was anything I wanted to tell him before he left. I got the floor about this time. and proceeded to backtrack over some of the ground just covored. As for his schedule and itinerary, ho plans to leave for Moscow on 23 October via Air Franco, stopping over briefly in Paris; to make a sido trip to Aser on 27. and 28 October; and to leave Moscow fon Paris via Air France on 70 October. He will fly from COPIES MADE Paris. to Genoa for a day on travel business and then return to Mexico from Paris on Air Franco via Now York, where ho plans to pick up a couple of suits and tako in "Supernan" on Broadway. He will arrive back In Mexico on 3 autobury November. 3. Subject said that in addition to the other three agents whom he had mentioned last time as having been invited to the Intourist Conference-loises SCHUSTER of Mundos Tours, Carlos ISIRGUEN of De Carlo Tours, and Edmundo GARZA ofGarza Travel Servico--he had. learned that 'ISaiC BULEVSKY of Jet Travel Agency had also received. an invitation. Besides hinself, however, only ScHuStER ory filid P- 8415 and BULAFVSKY are solnig, the other two having decided againstithe trip. for unknoin reasons. Subject mentioned. that SCHUSTER 13 going to take his son, who is in hie early teons. I asked Subject 1f he had been in touch with anyone at the Soviet Enbassy about the trip or 1f anyone there seemed to be resconsible for lining up participants 1800666 --- ## Page 201 sor or to have any special interess in the conference. Subject replied that ho had been at the Sovlet Embassy about the middle of September on risa business and had seen the Soviet he always dealsinità on visa matters, but that this Indivldual seened surprised to hear Subject had been Invited to Moscon and claimed to know nothing. or at least none of the details--about the Intoruist Conference. Subject claimed not to be able to remember the Soviet's name, hunted around in his wallet unsue cessfully for the Soviet's card, and then antd, well, in- any case it was the individual he had mentioned last time as having just gotten a promation to Consul.. I fInally asked him 1f he meant foGINOV whose name he had given me last timer-and after thipking for a moment, he rolled that yes, that sounded righty I then asked him If LOGINOV had shown any more Interest in hir or In any way been more friendly toward him in the last COPIES couple of months or since he bad recelved the Intourist Invite. Subject roplied that he had hot. Subject seemed a little sensitive to this question, and I stated that I was sure he understood: why I was asking, since I lonew he had been thoroughly briefed by one of my predecessors prior to his 1963 trip to the Soviet Union on Soviet Interest In visitors to the USSR. I explained that se had no intention to ask him to do what he had agreed to do on his last trip to the USSR (accept recruitrent if offered. and Oreg feled 1-8415 that we did not want to burden him with any instructions on how to behave or respond while there, However, I said, we continued to feel he las of potential Irterest to the Soviets and wanted to rake sure he was atsre of this when he kent over, had a beslthy respect for the leverago the Soviets have on thels hore ground, and LIGANN -1 Contact 70,7016 18006606 --- ## Page 202 CARDED 3 11 October 1966 COPIES MADE 14 lies 1000a1245, Jubj's offle 1o a tron hat dropped hy the orfice durine the mook and ment to have coffer miti jubli Juby remareed that lordnow doodn't seen to rant to talk in the orsico), Lo iron had brounht olene visa application fora for subs, and Subs filled thea out for hirgelf and his son, larcod, and turned them suer to Loginor alony with tho pasoporta (attached are ooplos of the visas- notor the viada are good for over 20 daja in the Soviet Union, altlouch the INTUPIST conference 1o. Sron 24 Vot to 29 Octdo Loginor told Suby that Pavel Yatalov, wantod to seo him (prreumenly Yatnkov has broucht sonathing back for Subj). Subj asked Losinov what Yatskor 1o doing. The soviet replted that Yatskow has a Job in tho Embassy. Subd proaned, "hat kind maid of a Job. It's worthrhilo that you gave hin a dood job." Loginor ropliede "You 6-7442 want to inow too mich." 2° The C/d asked Sung what deodded him to 50 to the Soviet Unton.. Subj replied that he had a cornionion fron the Petroleum Congrong (Subj is involved in orminizing the Congrcas for liceico for 2 to l April 1967), aotually in bohalf if Kli! and hia own intoreats,, to pérnuado the Sovieta that they use done other nirline then Aeroflot to traranort the Soviet delerates to lesdco. /Comments the c/0 3u» a barnts thist attäe confideditinl Irtter from Kuli which set out the probabllity that the Sovicts would want to use deroflot but that thoy had not committed themaives an yet ne to number of delcated thnt would attend or the means by which they would trinatort deletes atenched so a copy of a letter to Dr. Mos. anotkin arrointine Sung in his visit to loacon to talk to Dr. Neretkin- the let-er sinter that ther future wait or subj la excluelvely connected to assist the Nationsi comition" chuch la ratestly not the care since suby ta attendine the brior con rener/ At any rate suhf has decided to go to losco?, ird ia taking, is one son' Subj repeaten iun lectie in oscon as fer as contreta nith the seviet are ancerned. lie will not rog lim out, not even lechiporenko, and if contacted a tire l will be affable md ionedittal, and not put the sharp inque te hen thet he i, rouch. He said the lactor remains his rovition in lexico, or anywhere else tut in me ioviet Union® 3. The attrelini ion: let at the World Petroleum Conress containa the néren ur the . National Conittoes of the Iron Cartain countries. Attached are listinee of thr Czechoslounk irle aten and a"letter detailing the Hungarian deleratea aloni witn financial arran renta for them. Ao The C/D will seo iub.j before he leaves ledco on 22 October. It aid sit an a cite Mirates .117 --- ## Page 203 Lobile: 7 00t0ber 1966 SUNJECTS Contact lieport/1I00z8-5 -P-27122 7 Uct 1145-1230, Subj'o office I. Suby had been to los Angulos, Cilicornia for a feu daya and lad returned to Mexico on 5 Oot. Evidently he had acconpanied a Mietla delegntion that vialted Douslas and lockhred aircraft roctories in California, He mentioned that Aeronaves had purchaned two DCible fren Douslag, and ordered some Di-9'e. the lockheed plint thoy saw the new super sontt airplane. Suby had received on 6 Oot a confireatory telegram fron INTRIST, for suby. and llo son (cory attached), re attendance as the INJURIST conference in roscow. Also, In the mail of 70ot Aubj had receired INTUMIST mloados on travel mrulationa for tourists to the Soviet Union, rational plans, tours, oto. (subj will nake copins of these for turnover tot Suby reported that Yalentin Loginos care by the office on 29 Sept.. Suby was with a friend, potor torr, of en so he went to have coffeo with to-lner, taking along his friond... The discussion was innocuous, but lopinov askod fulf it he would he cine to see his frienda, chich subj too to cean that ill ina 0.Ko as far as Subj's attordnnce In Moscoy for the IUlIST conference, Jubd negered "yes". Locitov ickinely asked Subj whey rusk hid cone to inxico. Suny bantered a reply that the ortoen liniotry of foreien Afirira was coine to serve oue rare Chamjarne that tal liked. Lo Inor pressed Subj for the rent ronson. Sui enid crolly that teen, but he won't roing to tell lecinor. /cortent: hid hanter we report to de coatrate the time of teln mahtr it eye te hotreon Sui, he terror. Hare in fron Incision that borders on rirs for inforction or involvian Suba, the latter turns er with a joking mater innov accepts chia toricor ood nturedly, Jokinny calling Jiby." 'nao of nibitey". or worde 13. aubd discary sit. tre Clo the prospect of his coire to the ovict union. le mas debatin in lui cun mind the advisahility of ito the C/o probed to see has Subj refrand it ran nigeas standpoint, pitting the question "if you weidy't. 60, do you think i: sule hurt you frou the standmint of husiness." subi naia he Just didri't inns. The c/o naked if othere went (Suny had just said that mess li sarzn, thine eid diry (sarretio) nould ea althouth ther were not certain) did Surj. think she Soviet rut thron the bulk of the businoss their way. Agnin Suby doid he didn't knes. The t/d then said that unless there vere sore overriding business renson, Suby should take into accourt our view that there was a targin of hazard COPIES MADE CL CARI Filed --- ## Page 204 20 to Subd's beire thairs the viet Union. Suby nold thirt perionally ho had no lmen: deatre to 50. 8u the iciire linion, on three countag 1) the climato 2) "ho picarnt wouldn't put out it mol corpot for him do they did reevirandy) und 3) he mos plain afraid. ¿The latters risin antarently touched son hidden serine in Gulfo loritotaro Subj had limiter: al' calliro the coviota "iontarde" etc. ind mnileienttie. Now, Juby chided liegel"or dore no littlo to alloutato the lot or the Jera in the soviet Union. le inclared that tho Sovlot Union was the vorot pfinder a minst the Jens, becouse to vere olininating the race, not through thyalon extermintion but thrust forein animilation. Mid son view mas that the Soviets were more. annerous to the dect mid dardel than wore the Araba, for intance loberion or Joranny. who if 1t vern't in four of Nasoer would make their peace with harnel. The CO tried to cunter the self rcorinination of Subf by tolling him that ho had accomplisten i apers job in the duel of the lost aith the Sovieto threwe hio cooperation sich us. That, in viem of his real feelings about the Sovinto, hia dening with them had bren masterful. Subf shook off the C/do optiolatio vie of Subj'a contrilition to the "cause."" 4o. The c/o bront up the request to ret full detaila on the travel of nil ron Soviets to the soviet linion and auerosted that Suby automatically havo duplientes made of the visa requesto for such people.. Subj anid that would be simple - and ho would instruct Mirina" (the employce who handles INTUPIST travol) to make contes of all aprlicationg for visas. Conments the C/O saked Suby 1f ware coins to remin in hio enply, not taking a job at the laroell Embassy and Subj ropliod tint de was colns to stay on in Subj's riralo. Subj had roarked that he sas voing to discuss the mtter of makin the Horcow trip with hia nife. The C/o asked that Jubj adviso un is soon as he had come to a dociaion either ires a ainst coins to the Soviet Union. The C/0 told subj, that he would pasa by hia office next neeR to rick up the copies of the INTIFIST material. CARDINO PRM COPIES MADE Leezy -5 CR-P.3l2 70ct66 --- ## Page 205 SECRBT LICOMT Onoral Notes Turned in on 6 October 1966 28, September 1966 (Thursday) (LOGINOY) cano in for cigarottos. He paid that there aro 52 Maylcang studying. at Lusumba, These students ard solug to be the directors in the schools of the Politechnico Nacional since one of then has coso back well prepared in physics. (Thote follows a diatribo agalnst those bad Mexicans who wat to make Mexico another Cuba.) 33 Buptember: 1966 (Friday) The"Spanish' type" came in with a briefcase ind bought Raleighe with filters. He had the ame type of billfold as the other Sovlets. He then went directly to the sabassy. (I asked 11 he lad a noustache; he said, yos. Thie is probably GAZIYIV) 34 Soptember 1960 (Saturday) In tho afternoon SILNIROV uns thore when (ISAYEV) came in.. I asked the latter about the watches. and he said that they wouldn't arrive until the end of the year, SILNIROY loft at 25 Boptember 1966 (Sundar Unimportant 88 Septenber. (Bonday) A useless blurb about an unnamed Soviet who came in and discoursed On MADRALO, saying that he will set up a new party and an anti-Soviet blast: 37 September (Tuesday) (DENISOV) came in at 1210 and made a phone call.. • I beard him mention Dolicios and del Rio. Since these towns are near the border near San Diogo, I thing be me talklog about smureling arns to Quatenals (sic). Atteryards I asked alter his wife. He sald that she and their daughter are in loscor and that he o a batchelor Lashed if her mable house de fort at 1230. anovered, of course, but they all want a house. 28. Beptember 1966 (ledneeday) An account fron & friend that & Soviet will be pNGed for being Involved with the Guatemalsn arus smuggling.. Cittactinent to Licour. Contact SICRET Ripert, lacet lot P-11712 --- ## Page 206 : i. CONTACT REPORT: SUBJFCT: -P-ü115 DITÉ OF MEETING: 28 Sopterbor 1968 offers 1o LICOZX-5 reported on 20 September that LICANNYI Tours. was one of those Invited to attend • the 24-29. Intourist Conference In Moscow. This was confirmed by LlENVoY on the same dato. Since the Station had had no contest with Subject sine 6 danuary ighh, I: contacted Don Lautz of the Visa Seotion on 27 Septerber. to see 1f Subject was still coming into the Embassy regularly the on visa business. Lautz said that Subject had for some time now been sending an agent to the Embassy rather than coming himself. Lautz readily agreed to give Subjeot a call, however, and reached.him late that afternoon. He told Subject that the "people" at the Embassy woom he had introduced Subjest to earlier were Interested in talking with him and asked if he could drop Into the Embassy in the next row daye. Subjeot Immediatoly recognized which "people" Lautz was referring to, sald that as a matter of fact he had something to discuss with "them," commented that it probably in fact. involved the same matter, and agreed to come to Laut's office at 11:00 the next daye As he had done with Irving A. Oronslit, Lautz agreed to let me use his orfico to talk to Subject. 2. I went to Lautz's offico at 11:00 or the 28th, but when Subject had not appeared by 11:15, Lautz agreed to call me in my office when Subject arrived. Lautz called about 11:30, and I went right down. By the time I got there, however, Subject had already explained to Lautz that ho was sure I wanted to talk about his invitation to: Filia: ce. p.2712, • sittinat R1172013-1876 (rig) i erada A place da no ne l cutlers no para --- ## Page 207 14-00000 the USSR and had given Lautz a list of three other Inutes to to Intrarlat conference. Lautz introduced me by true name as Oronsky's replacement. Sutject, in what-Lautz had forewarned me was his usuall over enthusiastio marner, greeted no with a "bollevo mo, it is my ploasure" salutation and, upon confirming that it was the Intourist conference I was interest in, took off from there: Without the slightest prompting, he rattled off the following: a) He had recelved a telegram from Moncow on 6 september inviting him to an Intourlat conference in Moscow from. 24-29 Detober. He had immediately thought of Informing the Embassy, but because of the pressure of business siriply hadn't gotten around to 1t. When Lautz called him, he knew Immediately what we were intorested 1n. b). He had prepared a Xerox copy of the telegrain. for us; which ho gavo to mo. He has not yet definitely made up his mind about attending the conference, but thinks he probably will go. At the moment, he was still awalting the detailed lotter on the conference which, according to the telogram, was to folion. (LICOZY-S has atready rocolved his lettor.) In reply to my question as to whether he was sending enough people to the USSR to make the trip really worthwhtle, he said that he had sont only five people there so far this year, but that he thought travel to the Soviet Union was definitely going to pick up. He said that LOGINOV, who has beer thọ Sovlot official he has been dealing with about visas, in.o --- ## Page 208 to Moscow could consequently bo made at rolatively little additional expense. c) Subject continued that 1f he did go to roscow, ho would be glad to submit a report on his trip when he got back, got (group) pictures, 1f we wanted them, of his eyes open. However, he said, as he told Oronsky, ho la not intorested in working for us on a pormanent basio, was w9l1.a1g to help, he erplulned, because he belleved basically what we did about current world problems and, aftor all, had ilved in the Statas for many yearg and rogarded 1t as his "second home." He said he llked the arrangement of meeting in Lautz!s office because 1t made clandestine meetings unnecessary and because he had & perfectly legitimate reason for being there. d) Subject stated that he had already given Lautz the names of the other travel agents in Mexico whom he had heard had been invited to Moscow and said that once he received the Intourlot letter givang the detalls on the conference he would begin calling around to see exactly who was going. 3. Since a) Subject had already volunteered to do primarily what I Intended to ask him; b) had not yet definitely dedided to make the trip, e) Lautz gave no Indication of preparing to leave us alone, and a) I clearly could not got any farther with Subject on a personal level with Lautz present, I brought the meeting to an end with a request to see Subject again after he had recelved the Intourist letter, obtained the names of nose of big colleasues mao were zoing and decided definitely whether or not be was going to go. Subject said he would be harpy to talk with ne again,. get the --- ## Page 209 14-00009 Information I santed, and, " If I liked,". "be briefed" on the trip. It as agreed he would call Lautz to set up the rectirgo (Tho. situation was such that I do not blame Lautz for apparently thinking 1t unnecessary to leave us alore this timo, but I made a special point of requesting. that he leave us to ourselves next time.. Lauts, who seers to be thoroughly friendly and accommodatlngs. readily agreed.) 4. Subjoct impresses me as a very sharp, shrewd, cool-headod, but probably basically sincere indivlaual. No had the situstion rigured perfectly when he arrived In Lautz's office, had decided precisely what ho would be willing to do, knew exactly what he was going to say, and wasted no words in saying 1t.. I plan to try to got to know him a little better next time, Elve him a defensive briefing as well as one on what to keep his eyes open ror, and also explore his attitude toward a possible recruitrent piton from the Soviets. (Prior to his trip to the oss? in May 1963, Subject agreed to accept Sovlot recruitment if approached and to serve as a Dy.. Upon his return, boxerer, he reported that the Soviets mado no approach to him! I also want to ask him about LOGINOV; on whom he agreed to supply personality data to oronsky, put evidently never did. Subject mentioned that LOGINOV had told him about ten days ago that he had bee romoted to Consul. Subject did not say. 1f he had been in touch with LOGINOV or anyone olse at the Soviet Embassy about the Intourist conference. : I will. - got this from him sext time. 5° Subject told Lautz that the following individuals had been Invited to the Intourist conference: (a) Moises Schuster of Mundos Tours. (b) Carlos IBARGUEN Of Do Carlo Tours (IBARGUSN 13 also the preslient of the Mexiean Travel Agents' Assoc.io 4 --- ## Page 210 (e) Someone from the Garza Travol Servico. Subject also gave me an Al. France tourist ramphlet on the USSR in Spanish for ny information. 6i subjoct tentioned in passing that ho would bo glad to furnish us (presumably on a regular basis) with the names of those people who book travel to the Soviet Union through his Agency, but said Oronsky dad previously shown disinterest in such information. In view of Oronsky?! alleged disinterest, I let the subject pass without comment, but I see no reasoa not: take up his offor: Besides furnishing us with a sow more names, It would slve us a reason for continuing contact with Subjeot. --- ## Page 211 diminis -117 22 inicigerna s-.17: viver: acaeno, jovee. navina axico (vice Ca resicence: Car: Croit dutios: cas. ME 61760281 LOGINOV - Phorno renta --- ## Page 212 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 213 Valentin S. _LOGINOV (P11712) wich Bords A. CHMYKHOY. (80235) SOURCE LICALLA 2 August 1968. 8.11112 lere Dino Karusten --- ## Page 214 pella 12100 71 fail, 112 --- ## Page 215 P-11712 SOURCH: LILYRIC, 25 SEPT 1968: --- ## Page 216 14-00000 Valentin S. LOGUINOV Third Secretary at the Soviet Embassy Born in-1927 Wife Alexandra, born in 1928 Son Dmitry, born in 1959 LOGUINOV Is tall and has very curly, light brown halr. He speake Quent Spanish and some English. He drives a green 1965 Impala with •lomatic tags 19-DA. Palenline. I Loquinen 15-Á5-15 --- ## Page 217 •2 4 3.12 io derare al 9: . --- ## Page 218 Penzia hrealla - 20 sfil 68 7:120 --- ## Page 219 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 220 Contact reports, photos, etc., forwarded from: the field. --- ## Page 221 J000 SECRET PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE Reepared Fy. LIREALM-7 1282 2825 SECRET LOGIUAN-P-11117 Va 19 --- ## Page 222 SECRET PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE 1. This. is d new, experimental version of the Personality Assessment Questionnaire (sometimes informally called the PRQ Ill) which has been in use for several years. This new form is largely a checklist and thus requires far less essay type reporting than the previous form. 2. For a number of years, our operational psychologists have been de veloping d system -for "indirect.assessment of larget personalities.. The system employs-in lieu of psychological tests and interviews observations of appearance, manner, and stile of behavior. Such observations are: used as if they were items in a psychological test, and like test items, are weighted and analyzed to yield a personality profile.. Working from the profile, operational psychologists describe the target personality's basic aptitudes, artitudes, motives and susceptibillies: The goal of the assess. ment is to identity feasible means of influencing the target person, J. Reliability is vastly Increased when two or more observers complete this questionnaire independently. All items need not be completed; in fact, it isa rare case where contact is sufficient to complete it fully You are encouraged to guess where complete information is lacking. Mark such items with a "C." inslead of the customary check mark or "X." Thus, an observer with very limited contact can be expected to enter more "G's" than MX's." SECRET --- ## Page 223 14-00001 A. Bofore completing the enclosed PAQ form, please provide the follow. Ing information about yourself: Age 39 sox MI Nationality US Social-cultural. backgrounds Middle-class How often have you observed the target individual? 3.t04 times pere month over two -years. Then did you last observe the larget inaividual ast week. /ucck»157eb.167) Tennis club. 5. Can you supply a specimen of the target individual's handwriting? Yes:: Na. X Bit the main thou the penny elong walife n knowledgeable to compléte this form at least in part. GloRia Pinto --- ## Page 224 1. 1:01 1.02 1. 03 1.04 1:05 • 1.05 1.07 1.08 1:09 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE 1. DESCRIPTIÖN Overall Impression. (Check the most appropriate.) Virile, athletic, practical, and socially facile ("Hail fellow") Virile, rugged, practical, but socially guarded (authoritarian) Rather soft and sensuous but socially pleasant and appropriate (good guy) Rather soft and sensuous but socially guarded and moody (a possible whiner Manly, clean-cut, professional, and socially smooth (execu tive type) Austere, précise, ond businesslike (dedicated worker type) Cultured, neat, ortistic, and socially s mooth (diplomatic type) Sensitive, intense, and self-preoccupied (ristic or absent- minded professor type) None of these fit. I would describe him os: Dress. (Check the most appropriate.) Well-groomed (natty) Neat (well-kept) Fastidious (fussy) Overdressed (prissy) Nondescript. (bländ) Underdressed (informal) Casual (indifferent) ||111X --- ## Page 225 14-000n 4.01.08 4.01.05 4.01.06 4.02. 4.02.01 4.02.02 4:02.03 4.02,04 4.02.05= 4.03 4.03.01 4.03.02 Does he have a nickname: If. Yes, does he object to being addressed by his nickname? Is he addressed by a diminutive? -(Johnny e Jack, Hank, etc.) Does he have any scars or other distinguishing marks? If so, please describe: Yes. NoX Yes. No: Yes X No Yes. No Y Hair: Color Very light - Light Medium X Gray or white Dark Very dork Waviness® Curly Average Straight Amount Thick. - Average X Bilding Sporse Bald • Grooming Unruls Well-Aronge Unkey. Is there anything unusual about his hair or hair style?. If so, please describe: Eyes Color Yellowish Groy Bive: Haze light brown- Brown Wears eyeglasses Alway'_ To read Never X --- ## Page 226 4.03.03 4.03.04 4.03.05 •Eyeglass lens •Eyeglass style Thick Average Bifocal Average frame Mos, frame Contact lens Is.there anythirg.unusualebout.his eyes.that.requires. special mention. If so, please describe: 4.03:00 4.03.07 4.03.08 4.04 4.04:01 4.04.02 Does he rake off glasses when he speaks? Does he use glasses to gesture? - Does he ever wear sunglasses indoors? • Complexion: Coloring Face. Yes: No: Yes_ NoX 4.04.03 Ruddy (a) . (b) Scarred Beard Mustache Describe type of mustache or beard: Dark: Tan. Light X pole. Lined 'Smooth Clean-shaven X Unshaved 4.04.04 4:04.05 4:04.06 4.04:07 Body hair farms, legs, chesty Heavy Medium Light X Hair visible on nose? Hair visible on ears? Is there anything unusual or striking about his skin or skin coloring? If so, please describe: anto --- ## Page 227 14-00000 — 4.05: 4.05.01: - Face: Expressiveness Average i represe = Nutural. Tense: 4.05.02 If expressive, is face 4.05.03 If.inexpressive,. is face •Relaxed 4:05.04- In general, are facial responses Inappropriate Deadpan Appropriate X 4:05.05 Is there anything unusual or striking about his facial expressions? ll so, please describer When terise, his hea a ba eyebeous and tilts 4.06 4.06.01 Lips: Type 4.06.02-: Smiles 4.06:03 4.06.04 4:06.05 4.06.06 Protruding Spontaneous ly (bMery frequently FrequenTy: Infrequertly. Have you ever seen him smile to himself? If you have seen him having his picture token, con he smile on command? Or is he wooden and rather ill-of-ease? he would prefer? cinder i hero to erie Is there anything about his lips or smile that is unusual or striking? If so, please describe: Pursed Full: Thin X Loose i Mechanically: Average Never Yes X No 22 Serious Smiling_ --- ## Page 228 14-00000 4.07 4.07.01 4.07:02 4.07.03 4.07.04 4.07:05 4.07:06 4.07.07 4.08 - 4.08.01 4.08.02 4.08.03 Teeth Shape eguli rotrudir Average Unusual No: X Do you get the feeling he clenches his teeth? Yes If Yes, under what circumstances? Does he have any gold teeth or unusual dental work? Yes • No X: When he smiles, does he Show his teeth? Purse his lips? Yes Yes No No No Put hand over mouth?. Does he put his hand over his mouth when talking?. Never X Frequently Occasionally Always White Dull. Color of teeth Is there anything unusual of striking about his teeth? If so, please describe: Stained •Posturé: Straightriess. Is posture maintained?. Shoulders Round-shouldered Erect. X Consistently X Brood-shouldered Average Slumped. • Stiff. Variable, Sloping Narrow = 6r --- ## Page 229 1d-0n0d 4.08.04 4.08.05 4.08.06 4.06.07 4-06:08 4.08.09 4.08.10 4.08.11 4:08.12 4.09 4.09.01 4.09.02 Body build Skinny __. Average Heavy X Obese When conversing, in what direction does he primarily lean in relation to the other person? Towards: Away X Neither Does posture, when listening, differ from posture when talking? NO If so, please describe:: Sitting Posture • When in a group; is he inclined Relaxed rect X. Average Stiff Slumped To stand stil! X Move about in one place Lean against the wall Sit down even though others are standing Place his arms on others - If taller than average, does he bend over to come down to the group? If shorter than average, does he stand up to the group? Yes. When listening to a lecture (or watching a play or movie) does he No No Is there onything about his posture, carriage, or bearing that warrants special mention?.. If so, please describe: Hands: Dominance Right-handed_ Is he inclined to use his less doninant hand? Frequently _ Left-handed X Never X --- ## Page 230 4.09.03. 4.09.04 4.09.05 4:09.06 4,0.9.07 *4.09.08 Size of hands Very large Lorge: Small Average Very small His use of his hands is Graceful Average In normal situations, his arms hang Awkward Loose Stiff Average When standing (talking or listening) Tie has a tendency: To open and close his hands • Püt hands in pocket. Run hand over face or hair If he puts hands in pockets, he is more likely to put them in Pants Coat Nails Clean, not manicured Ragged X Manicured Dirty Average Bitten 4.09.09 4.09.10 4:09.11 4.09.32 4.09. 13 4.09.14 4.09.15 If nails are bitten, to what extent? Barely_ Blunt. Are fingers, Are hands. In public, does he Callous : Average Average Rough "Smooth Deeply Long Average Soft Does he put his arms on the table? Does he put his 'elböws on the table? Pull; rub, or pick nose Rub back of neck Run hand over face or mouthi Scratch any part of his body Pull at his clothes Never do any of these things Often Sometimes Rarely Never Often Rarely Sometimes Never When sitting at a table or desk, does he talk his hands? or listen with his head in Often Rarely_ Sometimes Never --- ## Page 231 1.09.10 4.09.17: 4.09.18: 4.09.19 4009.20 4.09.21 4.10 4:10.01 4.10.02 4.10.03 4:10.04 4.10.05 4.10.06 4.10.07 When talking, does he tend to Close his eyes Put his hand over his eyes Often - Sometimes Rarely - Never X If he closes or covers his eyes, is he more inclined to do it When trying to make d particular point When listenirig to someone else_ Does he tap fingers on table?: Never _Occosionally Often Is he more inclined to do this when Talking _ Listening _ Thinking._ Does he Rattle change in his pocket: Toy with some object Often Sometimes. Rarely Never X Is there anything unique about his hands of arms worthy of special mention? If so, please describe: Feet: Does he lind to show foot preference? Left Right _ Does he work to keep in step when walking with someone? -Yes Does he cross feet at ankles when seated? No Yes = No If so, which foot is over the other? Does he cross legs Left: Right Only when he faces in a new direction As soon as he sits down. Shortly ofter he sits down Occasionally Never • If he crosses legs, which leg is on top? Right Depends on how he is sitting Does he change his crossed leg ped ely epit in how he is facing --- ## Page 232 14-00000 4.10.08 4.10.09 4.10.10 4.10.1! 4.10.12 4.10.13 4:10.14 4.10.15 4.10.16 4.10.17 4.10.18 4.10.19 Compared to most people; does he walk Faster _ If he is out of step with you, does he notice it arid get in step? Slower_ Somespeed No _ In conversation when he becomes intense, does he. Uncross his legs and lean forward Uncross his legs and leon backward Cross his legs and sit upright Shift to a more erect position- * Shift to a more relaxed position Make little change, in position Large Average • Smoll. Are his feet Are his shoes (a) b) Highly polishe Is there anything about his feet or legs that warrants special mention?. If so, please describe: • Blun! When his legs are crossed, does Sit quietly - Move his root Does he ever top his foot? Does he swing back and forth on his feet when standing and talking in d group? Somother - When walking, are his steps Long. Normal X When he walks, do his arms Swing or wiggle his leg a No... Rarely Never X short— Hang loose Swing with his stride X Swing, but out of rhythm Hang tense When he walks, do his toes Turn out Stay straight X Turn in _ 10 --- ## Page 233 4.11 4.11:01 4.11:02 4.11.03 4.11.04 Voïce: : Is his voice pitched com_ Medium X High_ Does he speak: Quietly_ Average X. Loudly: _ • In his native language, is his. tone quality noticeably Quieter _'About the same Does he have a speech impediment? If Yes, please describe: Yes_ No_1 4.12 4.12.01 4.12:02 4.12.03 4.12.04. 4.12.00 Use of l'onjuago. Does his native language vocabulary seem Average Limited In his best language, other than nativer luche Barely flüen Moderately fluent X. Poor Does he pick up idioms _Does he learn foreign languages cosily If Yes, does he. Learn primarily by "feel" and by "irio and error". Learn primarily from textbooks In his best second language, can he switch from his native language "Smoothly with little hesitation Effectively with average hesitation Slowly with considerable hesitation Awkwardly with considerable embarrassment When he misuses language, does he ordinarily appear Aware of, but indifierent to ir X Aware of, and anxious about it Very amore of it and quite embarrassed --- ## Page 234 4.12.07 4.12.08 4.12.09 4.12.10 : 4.12.! 4:12:12 4.12.13 In general, would you characterize him as. Connie Average & Goriulous In ordinary conversation, does the content tend to be primorily Intorpersonal - murdol Guarded In ordinary conversation, is the content Precise and to the point! Relevant Avergge To the point bur rambling Irrelevant Does he Often discuss personal problems Rarely discuss personal problems Does he use profanity in his native laguage? Occosionally _ Frequently _ Never X Does he use profanity in an acquired languagoguenity - Never. Occasionally Is there anything about his manner of speech or conversational style that is unusual:" No If Yes, please describe: 4:13. 4.13.01 4.13.02 Gestures: Does he gesture when he talks? His most characteristic gesture ls. Always Sometimes Never Pointing with finger, Waving one hand Sweeping both hands Chopping both hands -12° --- ## Page 235 $.13.03 When he gestures, the motion is Groceful Average_ Mechanical 4.13.04 When engaged in conversation, does he fense up: Often Rarely _. Sometimes X Never. 4. 13:05 It is relatively easy to tell when he is really interested in a subject Always X Sometimes Rarely Never 4.13.06 4.13.07-- His eyes are very expressive Always Most people would find his eyes Sometimes X-Rarely - Beautiful Average X Pleasont - Unpleasant Sinister. 4. 13:08 Ho maintairs eye contact Always- Frequently X sometimes.. Rarely Never 4.13.09 In a group, have you ever seen him stare repeatedly at a person who seemed to interest him?. Often Somctimes. Never X 4.13.10 When he admires (follows with eyes) an attractive girl, Obvious. Averagé. Subrle X Thave never seen him do it Have you ever seen him blush? Yes X. No If Yes, describe the situation: st his political comments were successfully at ai party. Ali present, includwe timself were embarraised by the confrontation Is there anything particularly striking and worthy of further explonation about the movemens he makes with his bady, eyes, or head and me yes way he behaves in a group? If so, please describe: Sec 4.05.05 -13 --- ## Page 236 4-00000 4.14 4.14.01 4.14.02 4.14.03 4.15 4.15.01 4.15.02 4.15.03 4.15.04 4:15.05 Sleep Does he Does he Is he Enjoy sleep and fall off easily? Read or walk. lo prepare himself. for sleep? Rise easily?. Prefer to remain obed until the last moment?. An early starter? A lote starter'? Yes. No Yes_ _ No. Yes. No Impressions: would keat if you knowlodgo, de pou think mat sorien would find him: would find him! To the best of your knowledge du ally at ractive Very unplegsant Pleasant verage Unplessart ery unpleasan Without prior knowledge, yonderim on the rest rould he impress you os Striking Without prior knowledge, and on the basis of looks alone, which of the following do you think he might be? • Peasant Executive Worker. X Professionial.. Merchant Military Officer Artist-of some type Les If so, please describe: conspicuously athletic. Loots like boxeR: -14- --- ## Page 237 14-00009 11. BÄCKGROUND 5. 5.01 General Ethnic Background: 5.01.01 Please describe his ethnic background. slavic-blond 5.01.02 How does he compare with others of this background? Like most A stereotype: Not like most •I would never guess his background 5.02 5.02:01 Cultural Background: If he had his personal choice, do you think he is the kind of person who, living in a foreign cullure would Never change his accustomed way of living Maintain his accustomed way of living but show some interest in the local culturé Show some interest in the local culture and adapt his ways X Go native if he had his chance 5.02.02 Compared with his own group, he is just like all the rest of them X Somewhat different than most of them Unique 5:03: 5.03.01 Educational Backgros nd: What is his educational background? Please describe: -15- --- ## Page 238 14-00000 5.03.02 In your opinion, compared to most people in his culture with a similar background he Is as well-educated Is better informed Appears better educated than he claims Appears less educated than he claims X .:l cannot conceive of him having the background he claims. If you doubt his background, please comment: 6 : 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 *6.05 6.06 6.07. 6.08 6.09 Géneral Impression of Background (Check the most appropriate): Strong and rugged (a man's man). Strong, rugged, but independent (a self-sufficient loner) Compassionate, serisual and understanding (a woman's man) Moody, emotional, and sometimes bitter (the "misunderstood" man) Forthright, intelligent, and responsible (the professional man) Proficient, intelligent, and intense (the technical man) Sensitive, cultured, and sophisticated (the "Madison Avenue" mạin) Sensitive, temperamental, and unconventional (the Bohemion: man) Nöne of these. I would describe him as: -16= --- ## Page 239 7. 7.0i 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05. 7.06 7.07 III. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR General Impression. (Check the most appropriate.). The kind of a man who is usually puntiual, inclined to greet every- one informally and who appears to be comfortable with himself when he enters a room. The kind of a man who is always punctual, inclined to greet everyone somewhat awkwardly and who appears to be uncom fortable when he enters a room. The kind of man whose punctuality is unpredictable; who is inclined to be very warm and friendly with everyone he knows; and who appears confident when he enters a room. The kind of man who is punctual when he makes a date, but who is inclined to cancel engagements rather, often, inclined to greet only those people he has met before and is somewhat retiring or standoffish when he enters à room. The kind of man who is inclined to keep you waiting but is "gracious and attentive wher, he arrives, inclined to be pre cise and proper os he greets everyone, and can be quite impressive when he enters a room. The kind of man who is always punctual, inclined to be very formal in his greetings and is most often stiff and unbending when he enters a room. The kind of man whose punctuality is unpredictable, whe is inclined to be charming and sophisticated as he greets everyone and is quite socially poised when he enters a room. -17= --- ## Page 240 14-00009 7.08 7.09 8. 8.01 8.02. 8.03 8.04 8.05 The kind of man whö is often quite late-and indifferent about it-inclined to be short and curt in his greetings and is sometimes awkward when he enters a room. None of these. I. would describe him ass Mecting People: When he shakes hands Does he move toward you or Do you most often have to move toward him Wher he shakes hands, is his grip Very firm Average Firm X. Weak Limp When he shakes hands, does he Pump your hand Squeeze your hand X Let you do all the work_ Is there anything about the way he stakes hands worthy of special mention? If so, please describe: When he is first introduced, does he Look the person in the eye to whom he is being introduced X. Cock his head toward the introducer but look at the person to whom he is being introduced Cock his head and look at neither -18 --- ## Page 241 8.06 8.07. 8.08 8:09 8.10 When he firit heors a name, he Does rothing obvious to remember it Repegts it as he acknowledges the introduction Asks the introducer to repuat or verify it. Asks the person to whom he is being introduced to repeat the nome: If calling cards ore exchanged, does he Read the card and carchully put if away Read it and stick it in his pocket Carefully put it away without reading it Stick it in his pocket without reading it When introducing someone, does he do so With ease and grace with some slight embarrassment hesitation With considerable awkwardness To what extent is his monner different when he is being introduced to women? Not or'all : Normal X Marked. l he shows a difference, which of the following describes it? Uses both hands when he tokes her hand Moves in closer when acknowledging the introduction Becomes more formal and distant Becomes worm and effusive: Becomes warm and effusive only with pretty girls Is very courteous and gracious to older women Varies, depending on the woman If so, please explain:; --- ## Page 242 8.11. 8.12 8.13 g.0l 8.01:012 :9.01:02 When introduced.to a fair number of people at the some time does he Linger o bit with eoch person to whom he is introduced Acknowledge the Introduction quickly and wait for the next Look toward the next person almost of the some time he is: shaking hands with the person whom he has just met In general, does he strike you as the kind of person who will Always remember a neme's. Remember names in an average monner X Have difficulty remembering nomes Be very poor at remembering names. = Has ho ever asked you to re-identify someone to whom you had previously introduced him? No Yes: Smoking and oting: Smoking:: Does he smoke? Cigarettes a Regularly a Occasionally Never X How nuch does he smoke? Cigars Regularly. Occasionally "Never X Pipe Occosionally Never EX Average sc. Light: -20- --- ## Page 243 9.01.03 9.01.01 9.01.05 9.01.06 9.01.07 9.01.08 4.01.09 9:01.10 9.01.11 9:01.12 9.01.13 8.01:14 Does he use his own Is he the kind of person who Does he use a holder? Does he ellp cigan? Always Does he care for his pipe? Lighter Matches.. Is always asking for o light Frequently asks for o light Usually has his own light: Always. has his own light Cigoretté: Cigar Always " Al ways Sometimes Sometimes Never re 7. Never Sometimes Bites"off, end Fastidiously Average Neglects When lighting a cigarette does he Obviously duck his head and cup his hands Light it casually while tolking Have you ever seen him hold on unlighted cigarette and wait for a pause in the conversation before. lighting it? No Have you ever seen him put a cigarette in his mouth ond pause; match poised, woiting for the appropriate time to light it? • No- Yes. Have you ever seen him chew on an unlighted cigal, pipe, or cigarette? Yes Is he a chain smokermho Lights one cigarette from nother Smokes his cigarette down to the nub and then lights another Alwoys keeps o cigarette going even though he may not smoke it very much Does he smoke Only offer meals Only when offered a cigarette by someone Between the entree and the dessert when others do Is the presence of tobacco stain on his fingers Very marked Noticeable Barely noticeabie No stain. -21- --- ## Page 244 14-00000 9.01.15 9.01.16 9.01.17 9.01: 18 9.01.19 2.01.20 9.01.21 9.01.22 9.01.23 When smoking, does he Allow a long ash to accumulate on his cigorette Flick off ashes in a normal manner 4 Become unusually preoccupied with the ashtray (b): Let ashes fall to the rug Cup his hand under, his cigaret coal Always use an oshtray Does he Put out a cigarette with elaborate oshtray ritual Seem to put out cigarettes in a normal manner Seem careless about how he puts out a cigarette Does he Show obvious enjoyment when smoking Show average satisfaction Smoke perfunctorily and mechanically Is he the kind of person who offers a light to others Always 223 Frequently Seldom Never is ho the kind of per on it cos gro Will walk across a room to offer a light to a lady Is conventional in how he offers a light too lady. X Will seldom offer a light too lady To your knowledge, has he given up smoking for reasons of health? -Yesi Have you ever heard him mention that he should give up smoking But canne! Has tried to stop buf could not Hall you ever heard him mention that he is bothered by mo Cigarettes over heed him mention any of their Is there anything about his smoking habits that requires special. mention of special description? If so, please describes ~22- --- ## Page 245 9-02 9.02:01 • Eating: Is his mode of eöting Typical of most of his colleagues X Sorely atron, then hot of a college 9.02.02. 9.02:03 Is he d Heary cater Average coler X Wish catere Is the fact that he hos marked food preferences Very noticcable. *Not particularly noticeable" Not at all noticeable 9:02.04 Does he eat with relishe Enjoy his food in a conventional manner Seem indifferent to food X 9.02.05 9.02.06 Does he cat Quickly Avcrage X. slowly. To take second helpings To toke all he wants the first time around. X Often leaves some of his food untouched e 9: 02.07 Does he Dwell on how much he misses his native foods Show conventional interest in local foods Indicate considerable interest in new and unusual foods 22 9.02:08 16) He does not eat chile Tolking listening (o) He does eat maite.! TalkingX Listening X 9.02.09 Does he show a tendency to adapt to the table etiquette of the a people with whom he is dining? . Marked $ Average Xi Maintains his fomiliar style of eating at all times 9.02.10 9.02.11 Sometimes Always Roady: or When eoting out It is very difficult for him to select his meal Waits to hear what his companion orders and orders same thing Älways knows what he.wants.very quickly. 9.02.12 When eating out, he is- Somewhat extravagant when he knows you ure paying Very cost-conscious when he knows he is poying Very costiconscious no matter who is paying Generally indifferent about cost no matter who is paying -23- --- ## Page 246 stain 9.02.13 Is he the sort of person who. Usvally wants to check the bill regardless of who is payings Is indifferent about the bill when someone else is paying %02.14 When he is paying, he checks the bill Unobtrusively Very carefully (and rather obviously) 9.02.15 When he pays his check, does he,Obvidusly count his change Show indifference when accepting his change Take his change in a normal manner 9.02.16 When he deals with headwaiters, is he - Aggressive Normal and conventional Somewhat ingratiating Brusque XI 9.02.17 9.02.18: 9.02.19 i he prone To come long when enice does net sys him Directly Nos Not of all: He handles waiters In a conventional way Over friendly Unwally polite is there anything about his eating habits or manners that requires special mention ? li-so, Please describe: 9:03 9.03.01 9:03.02 9.03:03 Drainer get plan end molin othere. Check the A hearty eater with walladefined preferences. He eats and me with considerable gusto buf tends to be a little on the course ond boorish side. It is rather easy to imagine him eating huge sand" wiches and drinking beer with the boys at the neighborhood. bar A heavy eater with limited preferences. He eats and smokes with gusto but his manners are definitely course and boorish. I is rather easy to imagine him becoming quite sharp with a waiter who serves tim-unfamiliar, fond or a dish prepared in on unfamiliar way. A sensual eater who knows all the restaurants and their native specialties. He is very anxious to have others try dishes he has discovered. He eats with obvious pleasure, savors-his. smokes, and though rarely gauche, he is more aware of his food than his manners.. It is easy to imagine him cooking and serving special dishes to his friends. -24- --- ## Page 247 9.03.04 A sensual eater who tends to eat by himself when possible.. He seems to eat all types of food and has something of the air of a glution about him. He eats with obvicus pleasure, savors his smokes and afterwards will linger alone at o toble with self-satisfaction. It is easy to imagine him hovering alone over the buffet ata cocktail party savoring the tidbits A conventional eater who usually goes along with the crowde He probably has food allergies that prevent. him from eating: certain foods. He gives the impression of enjoying smoking more than eating but his table manners cre adapted to what- ever situation he is in. It is easy to imagine him taking on indigestion pill in the privacy. of his room. A conventional eater who always goes along with the crowd. He eats with little relish and rarely mentions anything about his likes or dislikes. He smokes at every opportunity; but: more mechanically than with pleasure: He usually tries to adapt his manners to the situation but may be a little awkward and obvious in doing so. 'It is eosy to imagine him grabbing o bite at a sidewalk stand at any time of day. A gourmet eater who has marked and voried sophisticated food tostés. Dining is quito a ritual with him, and atmo- sphere and service are almost as important as the food. He Is graceful and cultured at table and smokes in the same manners its easy to imagine him dressing for dinner, ens joying fine wines and food by condlelight. An unconventional eater, a man who "eats like a bird." He cots in a preoccupied way, obviously, indifferent to his food and surroundings. It would not be surprising to learn he was a food faddist (vegetarion, health food etc.) None of these descriptions really fit; I would describe him os --- ## Page 248 9.04. 9.04.01 9.04.02 9: 04:03 9.04.04 9.04.05 9.04.06 9.04.07 9.04:08 9:04.09 9. 04.10 9:04,11 Drinking: Does he drink? Not of all Average A little Heavily •Does he drink alone (solitary drinker) with others mainly for sociablenes on formal occasions only after work, of home. Does he appear to drink primarily for the taste primarily for the effect for both, His favorite drink is Vodka - Wine Whiskey Gin. No preference He prefers _ocktails Straight shots Highballs Short drinks He drinks Slowly! Average X Quickly: Does he Gulp his drink Sip his drink X Does he • Go out of his way to get a refill. Usually.woit until asked Always wait until asked Attitude foward wines? Very knowledgeable Enjoys but not particularly knowledgeable 23 Indifferent about wines Knows nothing, couldn't care less X Does he Talk at length (and obviously get pleasure fron talking) äbout his liquor preferences Talk abour his liquor preferences no more than anyone else: Never talk about his liquor preferences Is he openly proud of his native drinks and does he urge others to try them? Yes; _ No X 'Is he conventionally aware.of his native drinks and offer them when appropriate? Does he soroly mention his nolive drink ind nar "push them? Yes No -20- --- ## Page 249 14-00000 9.04.12 9.04.13 8.04.14 9.06.15 9.04.161 9.04.17 Does he Pay litile attention to the drinking needs of others: Serve drinks in a socially appropriate manner • Tend to force drinks on others Compared with his colleagues, what are his drinking habits? When he has aid a few drinks, his behavior shows No noticeable change Y Some change A definite change. If a definite change, please describe: Does his manner of speaking change when he drinks? Becomes quite slurred Shows little change: Does not change at all X. When he drinks, his voice becomes Louder have you ever seen him truly drunk? If so; was he Socially active Boisterous Hostile Quiet, withdrawn Quieter_ No change: No X¿ Yes Well-controlled Poorly coordinated Depressed Sexually aroused -27 --- ## Page 250 8.04:18 9.0419 9:04.20 If you have not seen him drunk, would you predict that wher drunk he would become Very unpleasant_ Very aclive- Rother pleasant 2 Very passive Never become drunk X I cannot imagine how he would act when drunk Have you ever seen him with & hang over? if Yes, is he the kind of purson who Obviously looks hung over but functions fairly well Looks somewhai hung over but shows it mainly in his eyes and general manner Obviously looks hung over and is quite vocal about how bad he feels Does not look hurig over in spite of what he says Is there anything special about his drinking habits that requires mention? If so, please describe: 9.05 9.05.00° 9.05:02 9: 05:03 9.05.04 Overall impression of drinking behavior: (Check the most appropriate) A hearty, heavy drinker who holds his liquor well. He is always rather boisterous, and wher he drinks, there is little change in behavior. A heavy drinker who often gives the impression he con drink others under the table: When he drinks, there is little change in behavior, but there is a hint that he could get quite mean if provoked A steady drinker who obviously enjoys being "tight." In d way he can be somewhat charming when drunk and can get away with a bit of the "life of the party" routine. A steady drinker who becomes somewhat more maudlin when drunk or tight. Tends to tell people how much he likes them and sometimes osks others whether they like him. Gives an impression that he could become quite disgusting if he got very drunk. -28-- --- ## Page 251 9.05.05 9.05.06 9.05.07 9.05.08 9.05:09 A steady drinker who holds his liquor very well. He ol ways remains quite dignified and usvally maintains his poise even though others are becoming quite drunk or tight. He still remains part of the crowd, however that is, he gives few signs of being disgusted or bored. A light drinker who paces his drinks. He seems to drink only because in is socially necessary. As o party progresses he tends to become oloof and distanti. Is likely to continue to talk about his work even when it is inappropriate. A light drinker who tapers off as the evening progresses. Usually manages to keep a sophisticated aloofness from others Often singles out and associates with someone rather like himself. As the party progresses, he shows. obvious distaste for anything he considers crude or bois- -ferous: Often becomes quite sarcostic about others' belavior. A very light drinker who either drinks only because he has to or refuses to drink at all. Is esilly not really a part of the party and is obviously annoyed when others bring him in against his wishes. Tends to be solitary and sometimes will leave unobtrusively when the oppor tunity presents: None of these descriptions really fit: I would describe him os: 10. 10.01 10.01.01 Driving and Walking Driving Behavior: He drives a car in an Unusually. odept manner Averoge or conventional manner Unusually inept monner He does not drive -29÷ --- ## Page 252 14-000n 10:01.02 He drives Very fost Average Very slow 10:01:03 When he drives and talks, you get the feeling He pays little attention to his driving He pays overage ottention to his driving His driving is obviously more imporiant than his conversation -10.01,04 Compared with his colleagues, his interest in foreign cors is About the some Definitely different 10.01.05 His interest in the care and maintenance of automobiles is Unusual Average: _Little or none 10.01.06 His road courtesy is Equivalent to most of his colleagues Equivalent to the courtesy of most people! know Unusual in that he is very courteous and cautious Unusual in that he is rude and demanding 10.01.07 To the best of your knowledge, he is the kind of person who Con learn how to get ground a strange city very quickly Can follow a rood or city mop with relotive eose Gets ground by asking lots of questions Almost always depends upon others to get him where he is going 10.01.08 When riding with someone else, is he the kind of person who is very much aware of the driving and responds with the driver (goes through motions of braking; braces with changing traffie)? 10.01.09 When driving with someone else, is he the kind of person who seems to adapt to the style of driving in an averoge or appro priate manner? No " Yes = 30= --- ## Page 253 10.01.10 When driving with someone else, is he the kind of person who: is very relaxed and relatively indifferent to the driving? Yes 10.01.11 Is he the kind of person who Would never drive when drinking Is inclined to be owore when he should not drive Would always insist on driving, even when drunk 10.01.12 Will he offer someone a lift? When it is appropriate Almost always Never 10:01.13 Is there anything about his manner of driving that requires special mention? If so, pleäse describe: 10.02 10.02.01 Walking: Is he the kind of person who 10.02.02 10:02.03 10.02.04 10.02.05 10.02.06 .10.02.07 Does a greät sical of walking... Wäll's an average amount.: Never walks if he can help it: Whon he wolks, his pace is. Fast Average Slow When you walk with him, he most often "Keeps pace with you forces you to keep up with him When he walks, do his feet Swing to the right and left (outwards) Maintain a fairly parallel motion Swing inward Does he walk Erect with head up Erect with head down Bent forward but eyes up Bent forward with eyes down. In a very stouped monner - When he is walking, he looks ground A great deal Average Never When he greets someone he knows on the street, his face • Lights up Shows overage or appropriate expression Rarely changes expression --- ## Page 254 10.02.08 Is there anything unusual or striking about his gait or mannér of walking? If so, please describe: 10.03.02 10.03:06 Overall impression of driving and walking behavior: (Check the most appropriate descriptions) An active, olert individual with a purposeful stride who appears to have a very practical mind. He enjoys "fixing things, ..ap peors to have sound knowledge of automobiles, and drives in o relaxed efficient-manner. An active individual who is somewhat stondoffish (or negative) toword others. His stride is fast and intert., He appears to have a practical mind, is quite possessive and protective and is roluctant to share his possessions with others. He "fixes things" in a matter -of-fact way, appeors to have good know ledge of automobiles, and drives in a determined (sometimes even hostile) but efficient manner: An active, alert individual with a fice-and-easy stride who appears most of the time to:be in good humor. Seldom tries: to fix things, but is often quite good at getting others to fix things for him.. He appears to have little knowledge of auto- mobiles but drives in a relaxed, efficient manner: An active individual who hos a cautious tinge to his walk ais though he is easily embarrassed or easily startled. He appears rather helpless and awkward when he has to "fix things." He evidently has little knowledge of automobiles and drives in d coreful (sometimes tense) but efficient manner. A well-controlled and attentive individual who walks in something of a clipped, formal manner Although generally. practical, he seldom will do anything by "feel.". He must read up and prepare himself when required to "fix things," He appears to have acquired considerable knowledge about automobiles but drives in a somewhat mechanical or highly controlled manner. A well-controlled individual who is often somewhat preoccu- pied even in his walk. When he takes time to "fix things" ho does so with intensity, and precision. He is often very well read about automobiles and cores for his cor or sees that it is cored for meticulously. However, when involved in conver. 132- --- ## Page 255 10.03.07 10.03.08 10:03.09 10.04 10.04.01 sation or otherwise preoccupied, he con sometimes be quite a dangorous drivor: A well-controlled individual who has a glide (or grace) in his walk.. He has little or no interest in "fixing things" but usually knows the best places to get things done and is inclined to be quite particular in how things are done for him. He appears to have relatively little knowledge of the mechantes of an automobile, but appreciates and takes good care of a good automoble. He drives with confidence, but usually ot a fast pace with not too much owareness of others. A rather nervous and temperamental person who walks rape idly and rather awkwardly: He has little or no interest in "fixing things" and is inclined to ignore or throw away things.that do not work. He appears to have little interest in or knowledge about automobiles and his driving shows it. It is sometimes frightening to ride with him: None of these descriptions really fit. I would describe him as: Hobbies nd Sports Does he have any hobbies? Yes if Yes, describe his hobbies: Tennis Don'" Know in No or Don't Know, what is your best guess on the hobby most likely to interest him? Can"t imagine him having any kird of hobby - 33-= --- ## Page 256 10:04.02 10.04.03 10.04.04 Collecting What does he collect? Guns, stamps, coins, books, butterflies, ete.) As a collector, is he Alicared Modentel .Only.casual: Artistic (painting, ceramics; etc.) • Mechanical (motors, hi-fi-building, etc.) Skill (woodworking. model building, etc: Intellectual (special periods in hispory, philosophy. etc.) Active (group dancing, such light sports as ping pong, bowling or volleyball) Outdoor (hunting, fishing, golf, ctc.) Social (chess, poker, bridge, etc.) Vicarious (listening to music, attending plays; ball games, etc.) Mental amusement (crossword puzzles, ana- grams; cryptograms) Has he ever mentioned having had hobbies in the past? Yes If Yes, give details: How well does he dance? unus gly out nor daned good average poor X do not know if he dances Describe the kind of dancing you have seen him do: Foxtrot, cumbias -34- --- ## Page 257 10.00.05 10.04.06 10:04:07 10.04.08 10.04.09 10:04.10 10.04.1l 10:01.12 10.04.13 Does he play chess? Yes KNo believe he is probably good if Yes, do you know he is good believe he is probably averase know he is an average ley believe he is probably a poor player X know he is a poor player. If you are a poker player, describe the kind of poker player you think he would be: FaiR is tie the kind of person with whom you would like to play poker?. Yes. No If. No, explain: Have you heard him sing? Yes X No Yes, is his voice good average poor X Does he seem tổ know many songs?. Yes_ No X off with a song Yes_ Now Has he ever mentioned having played an instrument? If Yes, give details? yes? Does he participate in an active sports? Yes X No. If yes, describe: Tenmis, embassy volley baht - 35 --- ## Page 258 10:04:14 10.04.15 10.04.16 10:04.17 10: 04.18 10.06.19 If No, what is your guess regarding the kind of sport that would interest him most: He definitely is not the sports type Body contact sports (football, rugby, i soccer, ete:) Skill sports (tennis, handball, volleyball, efc) 3. Individual skill sports (swimming, archery, skeet, efc.) He is likely to be interested in all kinds of sports Does he play golf? No X. If Yes; does he toke goll very seriously take golf in on average woy _take golf indifferently As a golfer, do you know he is good: believe he is probably. good .know.he is an average ployer believe he is probably averáge know he is a poor player believe he is probobly a poor player If you are a golfer, is he the kind of person you would like to play with? •Yes: •If No, explain: Does het hunt a great deal never hunt fish a great deal do some hunting a do some fishing never jo fishing Do you have information on how seriously he takes hunting or fishing? Yes. No: If Yes, explain: Has he ever mentioned participating in sports to the post? Yes Nei If Yes give details (include ony mention he may have mode of medals, trophies, team membership, etc.): BoxIng •36- --- ## Page 259 14-00000 10:04.20- 10.04.21 10.04.22 10.04.23 80:04.24 10.04.25 Have you ever heard anyone describe him es an athlete? Yes NO 'If Yes, give detoils: everyone Is he the kind of person who: is very much preoccupied with keep- ing in shape works at keeping in shope to on overage degree shows little interest in keeping in shape Has he ever indicated an interest. in weight lifting? Yes: No. If Yes, explain: He is best described as 'a muscular, athletic type an effeminate type a strong.. Is he mechanically inclined? Yes No If. Yes," does he Prefer to follow instructions in books Ignore instructions and.try to figure. it.out for himself :.If it were possible to provide American magazines or periodicals for hims which of the following do you think he would really enjoy: The New York Times Saturday Review ATlantic_ Field. and Stream layboy Xi Sports illustialed, & Life New Republic_ • Popular Mechaniçs" Better Homes and Gürdens Reoders Digest - Chition satience Marina Ramparts. * Scientific American Con't imagine him reading on American magazine -37-. --- ## Page 260 10.04.26 10.04.27 10.04.28 What books, if any, have you heard him mention as having read and enjoyed?. What movies, if any; have you heard him mention as having seer and enjoyed? If he had his choice, would he most likely afrends a movie. the theater. the ballet a soccer match X a bullfight ..di concert: 10: 05 10: 05:01 eck where applicable) Delegutes: work Can't delegate: Productive: • Thinker type Organized Disörganized Feels work is not apprecioted. 10.05.02 eir 31113011 work 211/01.111 Don't Know AIM 111 --- ## Page 261 Superiors Trust his judgment Like him Dislike him Delegate responsibility to him: See him socially 10111 IV: EMOTIONAL SET I. Temperament arid. Humor 11.01 Temperament: 11,01.01 in his relations with others would you consider him Shy win Guarded Conventional and correct Outgoing Warm 11.01.02 Is his conversational style Awkward • Hesitant Contrived Convertional Comfortable Easy # Volüble: 11:01.03 His manner of relating to women is About the same as with men More correct and controlled than with men More worm and relaxed than with men X 11:01.04"In general, do you think he is a person who Loses his temper casily. Has a quick temper but holds it well Hos a normali tempér Has an even temper and is rarely ruffled Has an unusual amount of tolerance and would almost never lose his temper 11.01,05 Yes Have you ever seen him lose his temper? If Yes, give a short description of the incident, inclüding how he reacted. -39- --- ## Page 262 14-00000 11.02. 11.02.01 11.02.02 11.02.03 11.02.04• 11.02.05 11.02.06 11.03 11.03.01 11.03.02 Humor: Is he. a person whom.you Have never seen tease anyone Hove frequently seen tease someone cannot imagine ever feesing cryone: onsider his feridency to tease like that of mast people X Is he a person: Who obviously cannot take teasing - Whom most people enjoy feasing • Whom most people would never consider leasing Who obviously likes to be teased His serise of humor is About like that of most people.. Notably absent. Clever Subtle Dry Heovy X Crude Does he tell jokes and anecdotes? Never.. Sometimes Frequently X As a story teller, he is Very good Average Poor A -Is he more inclined lo tell a story To a group of people X Quietly to a friend or acquaintance Only when encouraged Overal! impression of temperament und sense of humor (Check the most appropriate description.) He is o hearty, hale fellow who laughs with gusto and pleasure His humor is forthright, not subtle, and although he is sometimes loud, he is rarely unpleasant or objectionable. Most of the time, his good humor. is contagious. He is a hearty fellow who, when he laughs, does so with con siderable gusto. However, he is fréquently dour and sometimes. intolerant and somewhot humorless. His humor is direct, even crude, end at times, inappropriate. He tends to be the kind of person who laughs more at people than with people. --- ## Page 263 14-0000 11.03.03 18.03.04 11.03.05 He is à good-humored fellow who sometimes can be considered jolly and carefree. His humor is clever and well timed. He. is quite sensitive to the moods and feelings of others and often can do d good job appropriately livening up a party. Although something.of a tease, he is never cruel or insensitive. He is generally a rather quiet and somewhat complacent person who, or times, can be surprisingly goy and carefree: However, when gay, he sometimes overdoes it and causes some strain for those ground him. His humor is öften cleyer but he con be quite sarcostie and even biting on occosion. He is on urbane fellow, generally quite corventional and appro priate. He does not necessarily appear to be a humorless persion, but he seldom displays his sense of humor. It is sometimes diffi cult to tell whether he is in a good humor, because of the way. he covers or controls his feelings. His humor is more studied: than spontaneous yet it is never crude or inappropriate: He is a dour and humorless person always serious and intense. It is difficult to joke around him partly because he is not re sponsive and partly because he seems to disapprove. He is ó sensitive, sophisticated fellow with a subtle wit. He can be quite charming and amusing in the right sort of setting. However, there is something of an aristocratic quality to his sense of humor and he. con be quite condescending towards people who do not understand or appreciate his sense of humor -i He is go arty somewhat cypical person who con be quite flippant of times: His humor tends lo be a bit farout: He seems to have private jokes he shares with intimates. It is sometimes difficult to tell whether he is being amusing.or subtly hostile: None of these fit. I would describe him oss. --- ## Page 264 12. 112.01 12.01.01 Sexual Altitudes General; Are his attitudes about sex 12:01.02 :12.01.03 12.01:.04 12.01.05 Difficule. No detencore About average for his culture and background Clearly.uninterested : Indifferent Clearly interested X In the presence of women, he is Stilted Flirtatious X Hostile Conventional Vulgar Indifferent Does he go to "girlie" shows Often Never Sometimes with a group Can't imagine him ever going I have no idea what he thinks of "girlie" shows Does he, in the presence of male companions, talk about sex? Often Sometimes Rarely s Never other he hay chen thin he /ol bechovioriono/.ivd.no idea If Yes, describe the change: -42- --- ## Page 265 14-00000 12.01.06 12.01.07 12.01.08 12:01.09- 12.01.10 12.01:11 • Do you have any idea how he feels about prostitutes? Yes No If No, do you shink he is the type who would go to a prostitute Connot imagine him visiting a prostitute Have nothing to base an opinion on If Yes, is he Obviously. negativistic toward prostitutes Indifferent fowärd prostitutes • Interested In prostifutes In his relations with women, does he Generally act in accordance with his age and experience Generally.oct somewhat immoture and indppropriate for his age and experience Show considerable facility and poise X. Show considerable uneäsiness or awkwardness in describing an attractive woman, ieh most likely fo mercians Eyes Clothes Figüre Legs. Personality Have no idea. Have you ever heard him described in any way by a woman? Yes. X If Yes, what did she say? athletic, vicile, marily: 12:02 12.02•01 12.02.02 Overall impression: Which of the following best describes him? He is on earthy, lusty man who shows little embarrassment about sex. He treats women appropriately, but makes little effort to conceal his admiration and attraction. He appears virile and self-confident with women; and most women seem to like it: He is an earthy, lusty man who on occasion con be crude or even vulgar. He ireats women rather harshly, und con become quite pushy when attracted to a woman. He seems to be very proud of his virility. Many women would be offended or ser. buffed by his aggressiveness, But shis does not seem to bother him. 543- --- ## Page 266 12.02.03 12.02.04 12:02.05 12.02.06 12:02.07 12.02.08 12.02.09 He is a somewhat sensual, rather soft man-who is very consid crate of women. He is prore to hold a moman's hand overly long when talking to her and frequently puts his arms around women he admires. He often uses flattery and complimerts. but does so rather graciously. Most woren üsually like his attentiveness. He is a sensual person, but is embarrassed and insecure about. it.. He is o rather soft man who tries hard to be inoffensive.. However, he will frequently follow attractive women with his eyes when he thinks no one is looking: He is also prone to brust against or touch women "occidentally" whenever he gets a chance. He is a self-confident, rother polished person who is proper and convertional, with either men or nomen. He is olwäys •considerate and polite with all women and it is difficult to discertain what his sexual attitudes.and interests might be. In a group, he always behaves according to protocol and usually can be quite efficient in daing so. He is a self-confident and precise person who has something of the air of a professional man about him. He is polite, almost to a fault, and is inclined to go out of his way to. light a woman's cigaretté or see that she is properly taken core of: Nevertheless, he shows considerable distance in his relations with worien. Sometimes his formality is out of place, but he will rarely, if ever, change his manners or procedures to fit the situation. He is a charming, urbone person and both friendly and sophisticated. He deals with women in a cultured way but shows little sensuality or sexual inappropriateness: He is neat, even dapper, and con be quite fastidious.. Most of his relations with women appear to be quite pla- tonic. He is the kind of person who likely has several very close friends who are women: He is o somewhat shy and indifferent persón whöm some people consider odd or unusual. He shows little or no interest. in women in' public. In general, he is a preoc cupied person who only seeks out people with similar interests. There is an oscetic, asexual air about him most of the time. None of these fit. I would describe him as: --- ## Page 267 V. FAMILY SET 13. Marital Status 13.01 13.01:01 13.01.02 13.01.03 13.01.04 13.01.05 13.01.06 Is he married? Yes: X No Is his wife with him? Yes X No Does his wife go out socially with him Never Seldom X Averogo Offen_ Is his wife: older than he about his aga yourger than he con't tell Is his wife: unusually atträctive. unusually unattractive attractivo to an average degree Generally speaking, is his wife: sociolly poised socially adequate X socially gauche What languages other, than her native language does his wife speak? Spanish 13.01.07 13.01.08 Is his wife: better educated than he educäted about the same Hos he been married before: if yes, give details if known: loss educated No 13.02 13.02.00 13:02.02 Does his wife seem to; have many friends almest no friends X In public, is he: very attentive to his wife oppropriotely. oftentive to his wife indifferent towards his wife In public, is his wife: very attentive to him appropriately attentive to him indifferent to him o few friends 13.02.03 Would you characterize his wife as: aggressive domineering independen! • complacent submissive X dependent. -45- --- ## Page 268 13.02.04 13.03 In the area in which she lives, does she oppear to be: very satisfied normally satisfied X. very dissotisfied Have you been to their home? if Yes, how often? Yes No X 13.03.01: 13.03.02 13.03.03 13.03:04 13.03.05 • 13.03.06 13.03.07 13.03:08 13.04 Are their living quarters: unüsually nice for the cred typical of the oreo: unusually poor for the area. Are they, os a couple: unusuelly good hosts good hosts adequate hosts somewhat inadequate hosts unusually poor hosts Dog the wife a lon yery comfortable of te hoster a hostess. adequate as a hostess very uncomfortable as a hostess Are their living quarters: a reflection of his persorality a reflection of both their personalities: a reflection of heither of their personolities In gueri, hi furnishings surely nis unusually drab conventional Is his wifes obviously very interested in her home obout. as interested in her home as most women in the area obviously very uninterested in her home cannot really tell whether she is interested or not Is her social behavior at heme: Icss.comfortable Under ordinary circumstances, are they: the kind of people who entertain öften and like it- the kind of people who meet their social obligations and rather enjoy it the kind of people who enjoy entertäining only close friends the kind of people who entertain only when they have to the kind of people who really Jislike to entertain Does ho ever criticize his wife: Yes No If so, what is he most likely to criticize: --- ## Page 269 13:04.01 13.04.02 13.04.03 13.04.04 13.05: In general, as a couple are they: obviously very.compatible as compatible as most obviously not very compatible X Is he inclined fo: never appear jealous of her rarely appear icalous of her often appear jealous of her Is she inclined tos never appeur jealous of him rarely appear jealous of him X often appeer jealous of him Is there anything about his wife that deserves special mention or description? As a husband, ho is best described as: An outgoing man who obviously is the dominant partner in the marriage. He is protective of his wife, and always includes her when possible in his social activities. An'active man who is authoritarion. and dominant as a-husband. He is possessive of his wife and tends to be demanding in their relationship An outgoing man who is quite dependent upon his wife. She tends to be the more dominant partner and he seems to like it and expect it. An active but somewhat surly man who is obviously very dependent upon his wife but will rarely odmit it He may have some tendency to be jealous and possessive about his wife. A conventional husband who treats his wife with respects He forely shows his feelings in public. It is difficult to tell how he really feels about her. •: A conscientious husband who takes his marriage quite seriously. His wife is obviously part of the team and they both take family and social responsibilities seriously A socially active man who can be quite charming with the ladies even when his wife is present.. They both seem to lead separate but quite compatible lives: A quiet mon who is obviously very dependent upon his wife. She looks after him rather unostentatiously but it is obvious that she hos considerablé influence on his behavior and attitudes. X None of these fit, he is best described os: daninant paztner.. Independent of wite, Indifferent to here Wieds -47- --- ## Page 270 13.00 Houschold: Is tie concerned about thé appearance or functioning of the household? _No. Does he make mirior repairs himself? •If Yes! Fairly.competently. Awkwardly Yes no. 1d: Children: :14.01 1o1.oi 14:01.02 14.01.03 14.01.04 14.01.05 14:01.06 14:01.07: Does he have any children. Yes X - No How many 1 What ages. 10+18 sexorchildren male + fem Are oll the children with him? Yes_ No X If not, where are they? Giel moscow Does he: pay unusual attention to his children pay normal attention to his children pay little attention to his children Is his wife: an urusually attentive mother on average mother an unusually unattentive mother Are the children: unusually. woll behaved. normally well behaved unusually rowdy or difficult Does he: - rever tolk about his children. alk about his children as normal and appropriat X.. frequently talk about his children. seem quite preoccusied about his children Are ally bitechide nippod in deformed rogual bro, lie. No X If yes; describe circumstances: -48-00 --- ## Page 271 14.02 14:0g 14.04 14.05 14.06 When his wife and family are awoy, he is: obviously very lonely and of loose ends unlikely to vary his routine likely. to become more.active.and socially aggressive have no idea As a futher, he is best describad ou _An active, happy family man who is proud of his family. " An active family man who is inclined to be strict and demanding with his children. • An active family man who spends a great deal of time with his family. He tends to spoil his children. ¿ An active but insecure family main who worries a good deal about his children. An active, responsible father; but hos a no-norisense ottitude. His work comes first and his fumily knows it: i A careful, responsible father who is conscientious about his. family but not particularly warm or demonstrative. X.. A carefree father who takes his family for grunted. Nost of the time they fend for themselves and do a pretly good job of it. family: _An indifferent father, who sométimes seems oblivious of his None of these fit, he is best described ast Does he carry pictures of his fomily wife_ children himself In his office or room, does he display pictures of his family • wife children himself Is there anything about his relotions with wife of family that requires special mention or description? -49 m --- ## Page 272 VI. IDEOLOGICAL SET 15. Genero 15.01 In general: He'is a man with forthright and obvious opinions: He is copable of expressing these opinions with little apparent regard for the feelings and orleudes of oshers. He is a man with many prejudices and dogmatic ideas. He con: express them with heat and determination when necessary. He is a man who is likely to turn aside controversial opinions with flippancy or humor. It is sometimes difficult to determine his opinions because it is hard to get him. really serious. He is a man who.may. have.many.strong opinions but it is difficult for him io show them. He is opologetic, diffident and often uncomfortable: when an argument is in the offing. He is o man whose true opiniors are difficult to determine. He istusually diplomatic and conventional when controversial subjects. or haboo subjects are discussed: He is a man vito is serious and determined to be proper and : conventional: He has the manner of a well disciplined person who only says what he is supposed to say of expected to say. He is'a man who has quite sophisticated opinions. He is well read, "capable of considerable articulate orgument, but at times can be quite cynical, or subtlely sarcastic: He is o man who is shy or taciturn about his opinions: It is very hard to get him to open up on any subject, particularly if it is controversial. Noreof these fit, he is best described as: -50- --- ## Page 273 1d-0d0 15:01,00 15.02 15.02.01 Is there any subject.that tends to get his dander up? If so; what is it? Yes. No: is he a man whose patriotism. is obvious and intense is like that of most of his colleagues is guarded önd not too intense is difficult to determine •Ön general political issues, is he: unusually well informed on his country's position and attitudes as informed as most of his colleagues: unusually poorly informed -51- --- ## Page 274 MEDICAL 16.01 State of Health: To your knowledge, does he love any sort of health problem? Yes_ NoX if Yes, pleose explain: 16.02 Does he wite or children have any on of heal problem a X No If Yes, please explain: wite = 16:03 Has he ever indicated that he had health problems in the past? If Yes, please explains No X 16.01 To your krowledge, does he regularly take pills or medication of ony kinu? Yes " No K "if Yes, please explain: 16.05 13.06 Is he the kird of person who: Never talks about his health. or how he Talks about his health and feelings to an average degree Frequently talks about his health and feelings ger ho feel a rie out to are - brians to on orga 1o feel bad =52= --- ## Page 275 16.07 16:08 16:09 In appearance, he looks Robust and healthy X. Essentially like most peaple his oge Unheolthy : -Does he have A flushed face. breathe hard with exertion "Cold clot bellind A tendendy to to sweat to any unusual degree Foul breath To: your knowledge, does he odhere to a special diet or health regimen? Yes No If Yes, pleose explain: 16.10 16.1 As an overall impression, does he strike you os à person who is Highly energetic and tireless. Energetic; but in spurts Moderately energetic Lethargic, listless Is there onything about the state of his health or his fomily's health ¡hat warrants further comment? 53 --- ## Page 276 floria- Clore Pient 7 Valentin Lobinou Sone: LIREALM-1 Fili p-11712 --- ## Page 277 de 1848 i76g, 140 filio de 1968 17 4, Valentin togenon , Mendinitong simpli.. Talena non la copert. 41969 séte siR aude 147-11,712 --- ## Page 278 14-000 files Calente f! Laguinan Terceo aFecretario de la Emplejortes de la M1. R. 8. S. Cineno do lre 11:94.56:5) 15.60-45 fiven ti bicame 1 m ca 21 Der 1966 Gy tobinou-logran via p-11712 --- ## Page 279 State Feltinating -Mice- ander 1968 8. DaC 1800- ISKS, SiDj's 019168 mo. C/O artred at siaj's office mila suby vas on 11s say cour to the street to met valentin logino: sto had colled dy phone to ast subj to step costs to the street. It. turned cut that all loginow uas interested in uns to subj tro tichots for sha saila: for 9 Dacinder. loginor stingly asked sid if he had gone to ha main of the cuo presidents at in corder and sidy rajoinad.tlat he didn' nois cht masting dut would de on hend for the tamiry over of tha Charisad. /Corrent; the C/0 ins not anare of any Soulet initering about as he entered suajis building! 2. Sury reported that Alexards Prikhodho had dropped in to the office narractedly on 9 Dac, but dos. crevented from calking to SubJ Soccuse Subj'g mife and son vare chare. Fitsodko esked when re could haré lunch with isubj, ard-susy told him to will nax; suet, but that he ung terrldly dusy during the Christmas rushi The C/O too% the opportunity de inpress. on sudj cgain tha! he. uas to do thirs, absolutely nothing, for the sourees. doen ty the sonio's only wanted to tron about charged visa requircients for traval tri latin-Ararica - 5udJ was not to sive then the tina of day, Io. C/0 brought up. she subject of Jacodo zabludorsty's maniton to SUDJ.Of characridts interest in aldistiro the support of influentic. verg in his bid -for the presidancy, and asked if subj had heard anything furiter on thla. sasj said ino:" But re related the story coath for the. C/o: Fact in Octobar 1955 Echernria tos attending a conference de nich subf. present. Echeverpla cane down off the phesialum directly to subjes table and greeted hin. suby related this to asslodorts, and it was then that rasiuoosky told susy that ichevarria had goten to lin and said he Jesls he to a strong candidaço fe for the presidency, and mould like to rave a connittes of fibe gople in the FF-Nr66 vertsh community to coondirate with it. zabludoushy told susy he 22202 to propose subj:. Tabludoroty dic not nine any others. The C/O asked Subj sho ho coucht sore of the other itkely deutsh leaders suby sole it lag hard so say, but he nored tro:. Kictarteldman, o anter and ferrando Jara; the Recd' oi Binal B'rith. The C/O asked suay to chact tier tabludodoty on the whole matior agalr, uhen hod the opportunity. Subj suid la could do 30. 53J 89 intendirg to tate e too day trip to colomblo, outrer 9 or 10 Dec, correction with the Feirolera Congress. CARDED File ec f-11712 82270 P-7724 PRU P-5530 5530 P. 2712 --- ## Page 280 1d-0000 sources terroy/ locide a 9 Doc. 1988. Thie was sent to lirana by Ilenvoy/?. The laot commont pertains to Casaaadrid'e (former) assdolation with tho ¿ogal Attache!8 office, posalbig but i don't kno how Idenvoy/2 know of this. some. sator to kid seri obile the -F1le88 CarLos CASARADRID ( - 4-1698 "ces Carlos BLANCO •COB. LOQUINOV 117.1' c0 8 50-8-75/2 co: 50-8-75/4 --- ## Page 281 14-0000 Coneraje 22° 60105-1000 Enclano 8 au 471i0 ol Vicosaou trist sin no sen para pandonde tratan dicoria que acaba do recrear de un vando a tineln. 100301 110aàa no cajoda todirlo un poco dnllóida"y jabasrio por la noche en plego piro vorue y para allo lo puode 12umor al 37-36-93 sun do un acroedo do du tornano y alli puode digir al rucado o bios in au is'élna quo on ol: 35-11-27 ext-112. NOTAS EL to:85.13 17-26011 ce yaporde a una tlapalesia ubicado on la coleada forraten Fi30D; E1 teldirno 35-12-07. 10 1l contados del cdsfloto 4110 EL 6 dO diCIenrO dO 10G6, CARLOS BLANCO SAludO a LOQUINOY y dico quos "El couardante Culos, Elono urconois por looulisar PAVCL INTRECE". Lica tal ricurin quo sio entãe puro que dojó dicho dondo poderio lliuia liCO que al 10-13-62 o o la Guardia de siganizan qui arn al 21-21-03 y 23-28-10 y que le alen qué o uncanto j que pude lLama a la Mori que ruato, guas "yanos a Đo tur. de MuAlla" 1U6TINUV Do 10 dirl para jua loo Llone & las ocho y modio de ln sochu liliCo nota de acuodo y prácuntas .. "jun pasio con di abunto oce da coron de lo Dollos Artos 9" Loor contestas dicos axos ontonces adioso" (NOTA, LOS tOlUTCHOs rencIonados cortosjorion al surundo cOsa danto y Quadia do Mienta de la policla Judicial dol: o dicl0l.20 909 29660. CARLOS DENCO SALINO pUedO LOS lU rilunA pOreOna quios datuvo coolulosado por la pirocalla redural de Socuridad Junto don CARLES CASIJAPNID MINii: ip en cirudelo on la Embajada do 20s Eatados Unt:ose 8-10.968. --- ## Page 282 MADE Mise war 4) SUBJECT® Contact Disport /LICOZY - P- 2712 22 Docender 1950 22 DOC 1153-1245, 5ud1'3.01f1c0 3 The C/O dropped by Subj's office on 22 Doc, after hauing delluered a Chilatmas alfe of liquor to subj's home the previous day. subj was very apprectatiod of the gift. suisy proved che C/o the reservation card for travel of soulet Georgi vioro and ilo Jambly, Nino, Irina and farina.. They're bookod for departure from lexico for. 25 Dic Dy Alr France, Jor: Parla.. "Jarls to Brussois, uhere Viako has jour dajo of buntreas, and continuing flight Brussels to loscoin on 30 December. Vlako had olatted subf in company with another sbobot who subd uas told was de la Imbajade Sovletica. 3. suby stated that he hod receive lotter from Sidney Neintraud, U.S. State Dopartmert.offlclal.now in Chile, inulting.sudg to visit him. formeriy atatloned in Mexico and later In Mashington was the nubject of intorest by the Soulate ln Mexico,. who had suby try to maintain contact on his Hashington tripol: Please, foruand theo information to Gerald I. Gestatner in partlalin. "/ 4. subf orld he had recelved a firm Inultation from Mr. Haunlus (phonetic), öf Alr France In Mexico, to go on the Inaugural flight of Air France to Red China, posalbly bri Aprll 1907. subj wis complatoly neutral about hla going, but askod the c/o.lf wa had any Interest in his taking the trip to fed Cheno.. The C/O sald me. would let him 'know about that.. 3. ine C/O äsked subj to have the door to ris. offlce closed, do that wa itort dlacuas a serfous matter. C/o sald he wanted to explore frankly the status of subj's relationship toward. tha soulets: The C/O stated. bluntly that there wag. a feeling higher ups that subj had not achloved a sufflotent degree of cut-ods from the soulets, and that his posture of friendly compromise hts alanco: In reply, subf mentloned the tuo alements that went into rus attitude toward a) re the financlal gain from assoclading with them, subf sald that had fallen to such an inatontficant. level: that tt had no effect in htg dealings wlth the Soulets. And he: adid that level would sint even more when the souleta inaugurate derojiot. fllghts..rom d'ontreal and New York (the Soulets do not handle bookings on Aeröflot. through agente). b) Nts personallty (the C/O had agtod l It were posstole for suby to become cool or even unfriendly touard the soulets); Suby sald he could not charge his In the past year he had cooled off noticeably, having realsted all cooperation ulth them, avolded them, put alf/lcultles in the way of meetings, ete •But it was against his graln to be unfrlendly toward people ilth whom he might be thrown into assoctation.. He cited proudly that he was not beholden to the soolets for anything; and never went out of his ray to seat anything from them; for tristarce, he had been told that Paval Yatstoo had brought back carlar for (schem, and 11.Yatskoo .colla him, he will see him and cannot understand how he could be wifriendly to Yatskou under such circumstances). Tre C/O mentioned to subj the latteris equivocal reply of umaybe" when Loginow had asted ly Suby would report the nons of the CIA chief la Mexico 1f subs replied that he had told loginod that the latter was crasy File: cc: P-8017 (p1) f-11712 P- 11668. (p. 1) --- ## Page 283 SIBUECI OF VOCINENE -CRET Folled day DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE OCCUMEAT IDENTIFICATION RI FILE NO. OISPATON DA sOvaca doc. LOGINOV, Valentin SYMBOL DATE 7. SOURCE CRTPICHTULE. DATE OF INFO. EVALUATION DATE PROCESSED 10. OFSSEWIGATEDIN DATE. ,CROSS REFERREO TO THIS FILE. DOCUMENT CISPOSITION ID=. TRAASFERREO TO RI TILE 4O. PERTINENT INFORMATLON Lista del Cuerop Diplomatico, Abrx] 1963, (Cuban) Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores Attache, Sovemb Havana-- Valentin S. LOGINOV (LOGUINOV) Aleksandra LOGINOVA, wife ( DE LOGUINOV) Address: Havana-Vedado, Paseo # 309, apto 4-B APOROYED FOR RELEASE 1992 CIR BISTORICAL REYEW PROCRAN 001.585412 FILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO. 7 867 use (9- 46} ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10193-10033.pdf
104-10193-10033
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
06/22/1961
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CARACAS
DIRECTOR
CABLE RE MESSAGE TO BE PUT INTO COVER LETTER AND MAILED.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-28 : F2 : 20040310-1056699 :
1
## Page 1 104-10193-10033 RETURNTO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce •+== 1658 CLAS: = iMESSAGE EXt DATE 80 CONS. INFO: 1O 235S 33 v123 2961 "1-95A5 DIRECTOR BELL 10 COP, ADOP/A, WH 5, S/C 2 CARA INFO Л.ZD 23-13 23 JUN51 22 23z CITE DIR DERING EN ROUTINE CUT59361 •OUT 69661 4,7608 PIS FUT FOLLO: TE INTO SW IRITS COVER LETTER ALD IAIL TO AURE- 1] "ISSAGE NUNBER ONE: FOR FELIPE. HE GREATZY APPRECIATE YOUR TAKIIG you OVER I I OPERATIO:S FROT SAIQUE. AD'ISS IS NESD ATTITIG AND WE MILL SEID BY LEXT COURIER. WE HAVE NUMBER YOUR LIFES BAiK ACCOUNT ADITI BRUIN MONT.-LY DSPOSITS $200. USE SECEET URITING OFTEN A D RADIO ONLY IF ¡ESSAGS URGENT. TELL PACO LE VERY INTEREJTED RECE UIT INFORIANT I: LOVI INTO RIVOLUCIONARIO DEI. PUESID. NE FREPARING 'FORMATIO: REPORTING GUIDES FOR ALL NEVBERS YOUR GROUP A'D NILI. SEND IN IIT SI LESSAGE. ADVISE OF ANY NE: EXECUEIONS I'CUITINO INE TITY VICTE'S.* END OF MESSAGE Comert: fellne 1s"510J1 who took over maragement of the intel not :/4/PROP K. lul s. c. KIx/re C/-D ASINO CAPICIO 0/: 11/1 F2 ustin hi!/copr Matte COOCOINGINE ORIGIR SECRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. 03 R. K. DAVISO c/: 7/4 AUTHENTICATINO ORVICED Copy to. ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10335-10009.pdf
104-10335-10009
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
06/17/1996
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
PROJFILES-ARRB REQUESTS
ARRB REQUEST - CIA-1
13
ARRB
JFK
3/12/18
JFK-M-19 : F10 : 2000.02.16.09:26:40:280044 : UNIT INDEX
13
## Page 1 1104-70335-10009 1110.9 Assassination Records Review Board 600 E Street NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20530 (202) 724-0088 - Fax: (202) 724-0457 11115 June 17, 1996 Mr. John Pereira Director Historical Review Group Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT Re: ARRB Request for Additional Information and Records No. CIA-10 Dear John: Pursuant to its authority under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, the Assassination Records Review Board requests that you provide us with descriptive information regarding the "Interagency Source Register" cited in the attached document. Would you please explain the principal function of the Interagency Source Register and provide some basic background information, including when it began functioning, the purpose for which was created, which entity or entities in the intelligence community were responsible for operating it, and which entity or entities in the intelligence community made use of it. To the extent that the Register may have been discontinued during the 1958-1965 period, we would like to know why and what type of system replaced it (if any). In addition, would you please identify the documents to which you refer in drafting your response. This request should be interpreted in its broadest reasonable sense. To the extent that you are not certain whether certain information comes under the scope of this request, please let us know and we can advise you whether we seek to include it. Should this request impose an unreasonable burden on you that we may have not anticipated, please advise us so that we can work with you to modify or amend the request accordingly. BOARD MEMBERS: John R. Tunheim, Chair • Henry F. Graff • Kermit L. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson --- ## Page 2 13-00000 : . KI6 Assassination Records Review Board 600 E Street NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20530 (202) 724-0088 • Fax: (202) 724-0457 11:1 June 17, 1996 Mr. John Pereira Director Historical Review Group Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION. IN THIS DOCUMENT Re: ARRB Request for Additional Information and Records No. CIA-10 Dear John: Pursuant to its authority under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, the Assassination Records Review Board requests that you provide us with descriptive information regarding the "Interagency Source Register" cited in the attached document. Would you please explain the principal function of the Interagency Source Register and provide some basic background information, including when it began functioning, the purpose for which was created, which entity or entities in the intelligence community were responsible for operating it, and which entity or entities in the intelligence community made use of it. To the extent that the Register may have been discontinued during the 1958-1965 period, we would like to know why and what type of system replaced it (if any). In addition, would you please identify the documents to which you refer in drafting your response. This request should be interpreted in its broadest reasonable sense. To the extent that you are not certain whether certain information comes under the scope of this request, please let us know and we can advise you whether we seek to include it. Should this request impose an unreasonable burden on you that we may have not anticipated, please advise us so that we can work with you to modify or amend the request accordingly. BOARD MEMBERS: John R. Tunheim, Chair • Henry F. Graff • Kermit L. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: David G. Marwell --- ## Page 3 13-00000 Mr. John Pereira June 17, 1996 Page 2 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, Rion David G. Marwell Executive Director Enclosure --- ## Page 4 13-00000 143 177 ORATIDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: SEGRET CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON 25. D.C. CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS JELEASE IN FOLI ssistant Chiei 0200991, Intelligenc Departuent of the Army Attention: Plans and Operations Branch Interagency Source Zegister Burn lotice - lens Dieter KAiLiSI 1 3 UGH: 1665 : 1. Subject Individual is suspected of being a mentally disturbed Intelligence nuisance. It is requested that this office be furnished any Infornation your office can make availeble which night support or deny this suspicion, plus any own biographical Infornation not Included In the attached report. 2. The attached Information concerning Subject is forwarded for purposes of identification. 3. Reply by 1 July 1966 would be appreciated. Legative reply may be telephoned using the correspondence file number of this menorandum for reference. ISRAI-23,279 Att: a/s para 2 CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM Release In Full 1996 іКі'-r?7T Reply telephoned te nice 29 a. 12 SFARFT Exciadat Y 01sadt2e and 1- 147e 4° гáAя --- ## Page 5 13-00000 ADMINISTRATIVE AL USE ONLY 21. June 1996 CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS RELEASE IN FOLL 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR: Fred Wickham DO Focal Point for JFK Board Requests FROM: SUBJECT: John F. Pereira Chief, Historical Review Group JFK Board Request No. CIA-10 Interagency Source Register 1.. Attached is request No. CIA-10, dated June 17, 1996 from the Assassination Records Review Board. The request is for information regarding the "Interagency Source Register", which is cited in an attached document. this 2. Please advise how you would like us to respond to request. All hosin John F. Pereira Attachments ATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY --- ## Page 6 13-00000 ADMINISTRATIVE ITERNAL USE ONLY 21 June 1996 CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS RELEASE IN FULL 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR: Fred Wickham DO Focal Point for JFK Board Requests FROM : John F. Pereira Chief, Historical Review Group SUBJECT: JFK Board Reguest No. CIA-10 Interagency Source Register 1. Attached is request No. CIA-10, dated June 17. 1996 from the Assassination Records Review Board. The request is for information regarding the "Interagency Source Register", which is cited in an attached document. 2. Please advise how you would like us to respond to this request. Oh bacina John F. Pereira Attachments INISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONE% --- ## Page 7 13-00000 Mr. Barry Harrelson October 7, 1996 Page 2 which will be processed as an assassination record. Gunn will then determine whether there are any additional portions of the history that should be added to the Blakey version. CIA will compile the "Blakey version" as soon as possible and Gunn will promptly thereafter review the documents. Index. CIA has made an index available to Review Board staff and the stat his iment ava ertain histories rie may ate apprise or reces and will raise with Review Board staff any questions regarding the requests where the basis for the request is unclear. CIA will begin to make histories available on a rolling basis. Review Board has agreed to review histories promptly once they are made available. Although it was not discussed at our meeting, we would very much appreciate it if you would, within the next two weeks, identify which histories you are prepared to make available and those that CIA believes should be subject to further discussions. Cram's multi-volume counterintelligence history. Although Cram's history was not specifically discussed at our meeting, the Review Board staff understands that the history has been located and the Review Board staff awaits its being made available. CIA-8 (Intelligence community staff) CIA will provide a report to the Review Board staff within two weeks. CIA-9 (Publications and analytical materials) The Review Board staff provided CIA with a list of certain publications as they appear in an LBJ Library finding aid. CIA will report back on recommended action to the Review Board promptly. CIA-10 (Interagency source register) CIA has compiled information responsive to the request. CIA will make (cord available within two weeks. CIA-11 (Duran's original statement) --- ## Page 8 13-00000 Mr. Barry Harrelson October 27, 1996 Page 2 Other Histories. No response has been received to our agreement that CIA identify within two weeks the histories that can be made available and those that should be subject to further discussions. CIA-8 (Intelligence community staff) CIA had promised to provide a report to the Review Board within two weeks. Nothing has been made available. CIA-9 (Publications and analytical materials) We have received no materials responsive to this request. Additionally, no response has be received from CIA regarding the list of publications that are identified in an LBI Library finding aid that the Review Boarc staff provided. CIA-10 (Interagency source register) CIA has not yet made available the records that it had agreed to provide within two weeks. (was Oswald on) CIA-11 (Duran's original statement) CIA has agreed to make some further attempts to locate Duran's original statement. CIA-12 (MWAVE materials) CIA has agreed to make materials available on a rolling basis. Informal requests: Spas Rankin. CIA has made the Spas Rankin file available to the Review Board. review board staft research continues. When research is complete, staft wil discuss issues with CLA files fuum collection pulled /warten ARRIS stat reureu IN 23738. CIA is searching for cable number IN 23738 (7 July 1962). = Copy seat Marilyn Murrett. CIA has made the Marilyn Murrett file available to the Review • ' Board. Review Board staff research continues. When research is complete, staff --- ## Page 9 13-00000 CIHRG CONFIDENTIAL 20 February 1997 Mr. T. Jeremy Gunn General Counsel Assassination Records Review Board 600 E Street, NW Washington, D. C. 20530 Re: (U) ARRB Request for Additional Information and Records No. CIA-10 (Interagency Source Register) Dear Jeremy: (U) This is in response to Mr. David Marwell's letter of 17 June 1996 to Mr. John Pereira, in which he asked ‹ number of questions concerning the "Interagency Source Register"; specifically, a. What is the function of the register? b. When did it begin? c. What are the purposes of the register? d. Which entity or entities are responsible for operating the register? e. Which entity or entities in the intelligence community have made use of it? f. To the extent it fell into disuse during the period 1958-1965, what, if any, system replaced it? (C) Please find enclosed for your review DO Instruction "The Interagency Source Register." This three-page instruction fully answers questions a, cy and d above. With respect to question e, at this time I know of no way of determining exactly which entities within the intelligence community made use of the register. It can be assumed that all such agencies knew about it and used it to some extent. With respect to b and f, we will continue to search for data which will provide answers. We request that the enclosure be returned when the Staff completes its deliberations on this issue. CL BY: 611637 CL REASON: 1.5(c) DECL ON: X1 DRV FROM: PER 10-82 CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Page 10 13-00000 .. . * CONFIDENTIAL call me at you have any questions in this regard, please Sincerely, =Banatan Barry Harrelsor Enclosure: As stated CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Page 11 13-00000 CONFIDENTIAL DCI /CSI/HRG : JBH/GMB/bkh (20 Distribution: Orig - Adse w/enc - HRG File w/o enc 1 - ARRB Request File w/enc - DO (Fred Wickham) w/o enc - JFK/DO 1 - Barry w7o enc || w/enc CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Page 12 13-00000 CONFIDENTIAL Central Intelligence Agency 14. 8. 48 Washington, D.C. 20505 13 August 1998 Ms. Laura Denk, Esquire Executive Director Assassination Records Review Board •600 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Ms. Denk: Reference: (C) ARRB Request No. CIA-10, for information on the Interagency Source Register (U) The following is responsive to referent request. (C) The Interagency Source Register (ISR) is simply a device whereby agencies within the intelligence community which recruit or deal with sources of foreign positive intelligence outside the United States try to keep from no bara states bumping into each other in the pursuit of such information. It is for the further purpose of ensuring a source cannot gain an unwarranted advantage by dealing with more than one agency. Each agency is responsible for registering an individual as a source with the ISR before using the individual. (C) The ISR was established in 1957 by the Intelligence Advisory Committee, predecessor to the U.S. Intelligence Board. The ISR was not used extensively during the years 1958-1965 and we know of no system or procedure which took its place. (C) The first ISR regulations were in the form of basic procedures each agency was to follow, procedures which have gone through a number of reiterations. ARRB staff members have reviewed the classified, current written instruction governing the existence and use of the ISR. CL BY: (0611637) CL REASON: 1.5 (C) DECL: X1 DRV FROM: Per 10-82 CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Page 13 13-00000 CONEIDENTIAL Ms. Laura Denk, Esquire (U) I believe that this information is fully responsive to your request on the ISR and accordingly, completes our work on CIA-10. Sincerely, J. Barry Harrelson 2 CONFIDENTIAL ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10104-10093.pdf
104-10104-10093
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
5/2/67
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
OGC, CIA
AC/WH/COG
PROSECUTION OF CUBANS IN MIAMI, FLORIDA.
2
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK37 : F2 : 1993.07.22.15:02:15:180620 : 2 COPIES
2
## Page 1 104-10104-10093| C06067-0840 S125 RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce WH/COG 67-185 2 MAY 1967 MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of General Counsel ATTENTION SUBJECT : Mr. John K. Greaney : Prosecution of Cubans in Miami, Florida 1. Reference your request dated 27 April 1967 on the possible association of the Cubans who are being charged with violation of Arms Control Act, conspiracy and the according to our files with the exception none of the men cited were ever associated with this Agency. 2. review of our records on Orlando BOSCH y Avila has revealed the following information: An Operational Approval was requested by the Miami Station on 29 January 1962 to utilize him as an External Coordinator for an infiltration group in Cuba. The Approval was granted on 6 March 1962. He was afforded technical interrogation in the Miami area in May 1962 and successfully answered all pertinent questions without any indications of deception. However, it was decided not advisable to continue our relationship with him; therefore, his approval was cancelled on 9 November 1962. There was never any electronic surveillance employed against BOSCH. In December 1966 he was tried and acquitted of extortion in Miami. During the trial he stated he planned to sue CIA, FBI, and Customs for one million dollars because of damage to his reputation. 3. Miami Station commented that the effects of the BOSCH Group trial could be similar to that of the Masferrer trial. (Please see • attachment.) C/YA/COG Attachment Er2222 12210 1) KKI --- ## Page 2 SECRET C066.67-0840. WH/COG 67-185 2 MAY 1967 MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of General Counsel ATTENTION SUBJECT : Mr. John K. Greaney : Prosecution of Cubans in Miami, Florida 1. Reference your request dated 27 April 1967 on the possible association of the Cubans who are being charged with violation of Arms Control Act, conspiracy and the Neutrality. Act, according to our files with the exception nore ever of Orlando BOSCH y Avila, none of the men cited were ever associated with this Agency. A review of our records on Orlando BOSCH y Avila revealed the following information: An Operational Approval was requested by the Miami Station on 29 January 1962 to utilize him as an External Coordinator for an infiltration group in Cuba. The Approval was granted on 6 March 1962. He was afforded technical interrogation in the Miami area in May 1962 and successfully answered all pertinent questions without any indications of deception. However, it was decided not advisable to continue our relationship with him; therefore, his approval was cancelled on 9 November 1962. There was never any electronic surveillance employed against BOSCH. In December 1966 he was tried and acquitted of extortion in Miami. During the trial he stated he planned to sue CIA, FBI, and Customs for one million dollars because of damage to his reputation. 3. Miami Station commented that the effects of the BOSCH Group trial could be similar to that of the Masferrer trial. (Please see attachment.) TAL/WH/COU Attachment APT Exceed in suleatie KK1 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32291640-1.pdf
124-10207-10416
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
02/24/1977
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
2-2173-1ST NR 237
DIRECTOR, FBI
LEG, CAR
3
FBI
HQ
02/18/2018
3
## Page 1 JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY: FBI RECORD_NUMBER: 124-10207-10416 RECORD SERIES: HO AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 2-2173-1ST NR 237 DOCUMENT INFORMATION ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: LEG. CAR TO: DIRECTOR. FBI TITLE: DATE: 02/24/1977 PAGES: 3 SUBJECT: DOCUMENT_ TYPE: ORIGINAL CLASSIFICATION: REVIEW DATE: STATUS PAPER. TEXTUAL DOCUMENT Secret 03/17/1997 Redact NEW CLASSIFICATION: UPDATE DATE: RESTRICTIONS: JFK Act 6 (4) COMMENTS: --- ## Page 2 SECRET CAR, 2-14 By State Department telegram 2/11/77, Legat respondea "I. The following information was provided to Legat by a confi- dential source, who has provided reliable information in the past‹ qualified homicide and use and manufacture of weapons of Posada is currently in custody in Caracas awaiting trial(5) "3. In all likelihood, Posada will not be released from custody until all judicial proceedings have been completed in Venezuela. le is now a naturalized Venezuelan citizen, and cannot be extra- lited to another country unless stripped of his Venezuelan citizen- ship, which can entail a lengthy judicial process, and is not likely "4. Information concerning any weapons seized at the time of Posada's arrest is not immediately available: nor are copies of his passport. Any items sezea in connection with his arrest are in the custody of the court, and are ordinarily available until comple- tion of judicial proceedings. (S "'5. ANDRES DOMINGUEZ, SERGIO DIEGUEZ, and HECTOR ROBLEDO are un- known to source 3) "6. Source knows ERNESTO BIONDI as a private citizen, residing in Caracas, and who has many friends in police and government circles in Venezuela. He has a brother who is an executive of roctor and Ganble in Venezuela ernan weapons firm doing business in venezuela (ate with a "7. CARLOS FABBRI holds the rank of Sub-Comisario in the Venezuelan Directorate of Intelligence and Preventive Services (DISIP), and is in charge of the DISIP Explosives Demolition Squad. Fabbri has traveled to the United States on a number of occasions, and has purchased handguns in Miami through a U.S.-citizen intermediary. These handguns were delivered to various police officials in altered to Venezuela for whom they were purchased by Fabbri. He has also purchased arms directly from the Smith and Wesson factory through official channels. (g) - 2 - ACCRED 2-2173-N22/24177 --- ## Page 3 SECRET CAR 2-14 "8. RAFAEL PARRA is an employee of Viasa Airlines in Caracas, and travels occasionally to the United States. he has many friends in law enforcement and military circles in Venezuela, and, through a U. o. citizen, purchased firearms in the United States for venezuelan military oificers and police officials.g) "9. MANUEL ENRIQUE HIDALGO YANEZ worked for DISIP until about three or four years ago. At that time, he lost a hand in an explosion while dismantling a bomb at the Centro Venezolano Americano in Caracas. He underwent extensive medical treatment at George Washington Hospital in Washington, D. C. Since his dis- ability, he has not worked for DISIP, but continues to have many friends in DISIP and in the Venezuelan military. He is not known by source to have purchased firearms in the United States since his injury. (g) The Bureau is requested to authorize the Miami Office to contact U.S. Customs at Miami for further details in this matter, and to determine if a violation of the Neutrality Act exists. For the information of the Bureau and Miami, CARLOS FABBRI, who holds the rank of Sub-Comisario at DISIP, Caracas: is a Legat contact, and is the confidential source referred to above. $ (3) - 3 - SECRED 2-2173NK 2/24/77 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32290952-1.pdf
124-10206-10228
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
08/24/1962
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
92-2781-599, 598
DIRECTOR, FBI
SAC, TP
4
FBI
HQ
3/6/18
INC A/T
4
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 6/11/201 AGENCY : FBI RECORD NUMBER : 124-10206-10228 RECORD SERIES : HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 92-2781-599, 598 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: SAC, TP TO: DIRECTOR, FBI TITLE : DATE : 'PAGES: SUBJECTS : 08/24/1962 4 LST, ASSOC, BUSS DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION : Unclassified RESTRICTIONS : 4 CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 10/13/1998 OPENING CRITERIA : INDEFINITE COMMENTS : INC A/T t. v9.1 46 --- ## Page 2 FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-56) FBI Date: 8/31/62 (Type in plain text or code) (Priority or Method of Mailing) Transmit the following in Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL TO: FROM: SANTO AR DIRECTOR, FBI (92-2781) SAC, TAMPA (92-1) (P) TRAFFICANTE, JR., aka Re my airtel, 8/24/62. WEEKLY AIRTEL SUMMARY On 8/29/62, Detectives WILLIAM WARREN and ROBERT COOK, Orlando, Fla. PD, advised their office had covered the Pine Hills Country Club the nights of 811 and 18/62. They advised their coverage determined that subject did not visit the club on either evening and there has been no indication of his presence in Orlando, Florida during recent months. (It is noted that ROYCE EARL SIMMONS had previously advised subject was to attend a meeting at the above location on 8/11/62). PCI DOMINICK LaROCA, Tampa, determined that individual ip contact with JINVY LONGO, Tampa, driving 1956-58 Cadillac, bearing 1962 Florida license 3W-51546. Above tag determined issued to KENNETH GUTHRIE, 4008 Talia- ferro, Tampa. Further investigation, Tampa, determined GUTHRIE employed oy General Telephone Company, Tampa, and his photograph obtained to be shown to PCI for positive identification. Subject's 1959 Chevrolet Impala, 1962 Florida license 3W- 12736, has been observed at subject's Tampa residence since 8/29/62. Sources and observation of subject's residence failed to indicate subject presently in Tampa. Subject's wife not observed at resi dence. a Wich REC- Z (3 - Bureau 1 - Miami (92-88) (Info) 1 100. - Tampa 92-228/599 FXO/ mw (5) 12 SEP 3 1962 56548/503862 Approved: Sent M Special Agent in Charge --- ## Page 3 TP 92-1 PCI MARIO CESAR CAPAZ, Tampa, has advised subject has not been in Columbia Restaurant, and subject's close associate, JINMY LONGO, has not been in Restaurant since the afternoon of 8/26/62. No activity re subject or associates has been ob served at St. Petersburg Beach residence. Detective JACK DE LA LLANA, Intelligence Unit, Tampa PD, advised his sources report subject continues resi- dence in Miami. --- ## Page 4 FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-56) FBI Date: 8/24/62 Transmit the following in Via AIRTEL PLAIN TEXT (Type in plain text or code) AIR MAIL (Priority or Method of Mailing) TO: DIRECTOR, FBI (92-2781) FROM: SAC, TAMPA (92-1 (P) SANTO TRAFFICANTE, JR, aba. AR Remyairtel, 8/17/62. WEEKLY AIRTEL SUMMARY Dallas Office advised that PCI GEORGE FUQUA related he and JAMES HENRY DOLAN, late 1960 or early 1961 went to miami, Fla. and contacted MILO BELL. was acquainted with both BELL and TRAFFICANTE and the purpose of the contact was to see if BELL could use FUQUA and DOLAN in the "collection business" or as enforcers for TRAFFICANTE. According to informant, DOLAN contacted BELL through JOHNNY WILLIAMS, an Italian from Boston. PCI related BELL asked DOLAN and FUQUA if they were interested in an armored car deal as BELL knew another person, not identified, who had the necessary keys. TRAFFICANTE was to get part of the "score" for protection he was furnishing. FUQUA and DOLAN declined as it appeared too risky. Informant continued that subsequently DOLAN and roQuA, acting for BELL AND TRAFFICANTE, knocked off two bolita men and obtained $7,000 from one of them. t. Bureau 2 - Miami 1 - Tampa ?. FX0: cl (6) REC-21 92-2781-598 12 AUC 217 1962 EX-ING Approved: Sent Per Special Agent in Charge --- ## Page 5 TP 92-1 PCI related he was never in Tampa and alt his contacts with BELL and TRAFFICANTE were in the Miami area. Continued observation of subject's residence and hangouts subject not located Tampa, during the past week, have determined in the Tampa area. PCI ANNIE MAY JACKSON advised 8/24/62 subject not at his residence and only cars observed 2505 Bristol are cars of subject's daughter, SARAH ANN and AUGIE PANIELLO. LEAD: MIAMI DIVISION AT MIAMI, FLORIDA Will check sources and files WILLIAMS above. to identify JOHNNY 2 t. -- ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10315-10015.pdf
104-10315-10015
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
9/7/61
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
LA DIV WORK FILE
THE RECORD
WITHHELD
MEMO:CONSIDERATION OF THE CUBAN MATTER BY THE 5412 SPECIAL GROUP
2
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK-WF05 : F2 : 1999.01.27.16:34:59:043120 :
2
## Page 1 110410315100151. TOP SEGRET 7 September 1961 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Consideration of the Cuban Matter by the 3412 Special Group 1. Attached are my detailed notes made while reading the minutes of the Special Group yesterday. The 12 pp. paper that paper purported to quote the minutes only with reference to the strike force concept. (It should be replaced in the two WH/4 bound volumes of papers furnished the Taylor Committee, at "Part FF.") 2. I call attention to the following new matters, which suggests a number of points that should be reflected in my draft irri report of 31 August 1961: Al. Parrott was the Assistant to DD/P for Executive Branch Matters (DD/P/FBM). He not only acted as secretary of Special Group, and briefed the DCI beforehand, but took an active role in the discussions, at least from time to time, i.e., at meetings of 8/11, 9/1, 9/8 and 11/16. This introduces stil] another non-operator echelon in the decision-making, between DCI and Chief, WH/4. b. These minutes show the extremely detailed reporting by CIA to the Special Group and requests for approval of individual operations, 1.e., individual air drops. c. Note that the detailed reporting to the Special Grou was almost always done by Bissell or Barnes, not by the DCI. d. Note Adm. Burke's statement that Navy Ideas were to have 50,000 U.S. military for intervention in Cuba. (3/14/60 meeting) Query: was this statement in the back of the minds of CIA operators bathe Cuban Brigade was only a spearhead considerable additional talk of overt intervention. AJOF SECRET --- ## Page 2 13-00000 e. Note (8/25 meeting) reference to Barnes' assurances to Macy of Budget that 1t would be "out of question" to mount an invasion without participation of large numbers of disaffected individuals within the country (Cuba). I. The words "Special Discussion" e•g., 10/6 meeting, DP/D indicate in my notes discussions of sensitive Do/! activities (PIC). They are described at length in the minutes, but I took no notes on g. Note (11/3 meeting) State's suggesting that the three top Cubans be assassinated. h. Note CIA was conducting a re-evaluation of the entire situation (which presumably led to the decision to go ahead with a large brigade): Should we not ask Bissell whether any memoranda of this re-evaluation are in existence? 1. There is reference to Cuba being on NSC agenda for early November 1960. Should we inquire what was said at such NSC meeting? j. Note Barnes' preposterous statement (12/5) that 600 troops (in invasion) would be just as useful as 3000. k. It is clear that the pressures to get the Cuban trainees out of Guatemala were considered by the Special Group to be real and urgent. Tar erece 3. Will IG and GD and RIBS please make" additsonal suggestions, for Inclusion in draft report? ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10119-10061.pdf
104-10119-10061
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
07/25/1969
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CHIEF, EUROPEAN DIVISION
CHIEF, PHYSICAL SECURITY DIVISION
MEMO ON OPEN SAFE SECURITY VIOLATION.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK43 : F18A : 1997.06.27.07:32:02:403106 :
1
## Page 1 104-10119-10061 PUNFIULNIIHL 25 JUL 1969 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, European Division, DE/P : SUBJECT : Security Violation - Open Safe HUNT, E. Howard 1. An investigation by this Office has determined that Mr. E. Howard Hunt and Missl I both assigned to your Office, were responsible for an Open Safe security violation which occurred on 15 July 1969. 2. The records of this Office indicate that: a. Mr. Hunt has been charged with an Open Safe security violation which occurred on 3 September 1968. In view of the fact that there have not been two consec- utive years without a violation since 3 September 1968, this is to be considered Mr. Hunt's second security vi- olation for administrative action as specified in Section (e) of CIA Headquarters Regulation 10-1. b. Missh. 03 Thas not been previously charged with a security violation. 3. In accordance with the provisions of Headquarters Regulation 10-1, it would be appreciated if this Office were advised of the action taken in this case. The action should be noted in the space provided for your convenience at the bottom of the attached report, in this, in turn, forwarded to this Office. Att Violation Report Content thin James W. McCord, Jr. To cia, one, i see him, do RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce CONFIDENTIAL Excleded from automatic downgradiog and declassification 3/50 Dalian?. ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10173-10015.pdf
104-10173-10015
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
5/3/62
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CHIEF, SR DIVISION
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SECURITY (INVEST
MEMO.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-9 : F10 : 1998.02.14.10:50:18:716031 :
1
## Page 1 104-10173-10015 S-E-C-R-E-T (When Pilled In) MEMORANDUM FOR: ATTENTION FRON Chief, SR Divialon Deputy Direotor of Security (Investigations and Operational Support ) _ sonatize -released • lur 106 RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10121-10239.pdf
104-10121-10239
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
09/29/1966
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
SUBJECT'S SUPERVISOR IS A CURRENT GS-15 STAFF EMPLOYEE WHO EOD IN 1951.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK44 : F22 : 1997.09.22.20:38:12:653102 :
1
## Page 1 104-10121-10239 SEUKLI 0-592 217 0-105343 - S:ouse Subject's spouse is a current GS-9 staff employee who EOD in March 195c. H.D. - 0-487250 - SR°S 308 Subject's SR's son was a susser contract euployee at a C Agency facility for 1256. R.D. 0-48277 - 53 Subject's Sa 18 a current G5-10 staff employee who BOD 1a July 1951. H.D. MORALES, David Sanchez - 0/C - 35418 - gupervisor Subject's supervisor 18 a current GS-15 stail employee voo EOD In 1951. M.D. 0/0 - 44772 - 58 Bubject's SA le a current GS-12 staff earloyee who BOD In Apri 1951 HE Ille contains un sas flag sheet dated 6 March 1256. No pertinent derogatory information. 0-38798 - SUPerViGOr Subject's sujervisor is a current GS-15 staff emplogee who BOD in Serlember 19490 MaDe tensi 0-38123 - EUSerVIsOr Sutject's supervisor is & current GS-it staff enzloyee who DOD in September 1049. N.D. RETIRITO CIA Baske.urd Dog Only Do Nol Reproduco ä, Centecher 1kd TiTi SIZi: 115 SOCIET 62337 1 declaccification 1 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32279111.pdf
124-10068-10015
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
11/25/1963
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
44-24016-166
DIRECTOR, FBI
SAC, SA
5
FBI
HQ
2/5/18
5
## Page 1 8/25/2014 JFK Full Results National Archives and Records Administration Kennedy Assassination Collection Full Results Viewing/Ordering Information Exit JFK Back to Brief Results Back to Search Hits 1-1 of 1 Hit 1 of 1 AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY : FBI RECORD NUMBER : 124-10068-10015 RECORDS SERIES : HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 44-24016-166 DOCUMENT INFORMATION ORIGINATOR : FBI FROM SAC, SA TO : DIRECTOR, FBI TITLE : [No Titlel DATE : 11/25/1963 PAGES 5 DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT SUBJECTS CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED RESTRICTIONS CURRENT STATUS RELEASED WITH DELETIONS DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 05/06/1996 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE Audit history for this Record Identification Form Hits 1-1 of 1 Back to Brief Results Back to Search National Archives and Records Administration webmaster@nara.gov Exit JFK 1/1 --- ## Page 2 ON 4/5/97 • URGENT 11-25-63 5-50PM CST RDL TO -DIRECTOR AND SAC, DALLAS FROM SAC, SAN ANTONIO 144-7481 ie Coriat JACK LEON RUBY, AKAO, LEE HARVEY OSWALD, AKA. DASH, VICTIM DASH DECEASED, CRO 00 DALLAS. RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SACS TODAY. JOSEPH PA ROSSI, REAL ESTATE, TWO THREE ONE MERCHANTILE CONTINENTAL BUILDING, DALLAS, TEXAS, ON NOV. TWENTYFIVE -INSTANT ADVISED SAS THOMAS W. CRAWFORD AND CLAY ZACHRY, JR., RIATE AGENCIES OF. AS FOLLOWS- HE SAID THAT HE AND JACK RUBY, WHOSE REAL NAME IS ADVISI SLIP RUBENSTEIN, WERE BOTH BORN AND REARED IN THE TWENTYFOURTH WARD IN CHICAGO. HOWEVER, DID NOT KNOW EACH OTHER UNTIL ABOUT ELEVEN YEARS AGO WHEN THEY MET IN DALLAS • RUBY HAD THE SILVER SPUR CLUB AND LATER THE VEGAS CLUB. ROSSI DOES NOT KNOW MANY OF RUBY-S FAMILY, BUT SAID THEY ARE JEWS AND THAT JACK RUBY OBSERVES JEWISH RELIGIOUS CUSTOMS • ROSSI KNOWS OF NO CONNECTION BETWEEN OSWALD AND RUBY. HE STATES THAT RUBY IS HIGHLY EMOTIONAL AND HAS A HIGH TEMPER. END PAGE ONE :: 2040 213 REC 27/ 44-24016-166 :33.5 DocId: 32279111 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 . . TAREE PAGE FWO CASE. A SIMPLE AND EMOTIONAL MAN FOR OBTAINING JUSTICE IN THIS FD THREE ZERO TWO FOLLOWS ON ABOVE. SOURCES AI SAN ANTONIO, AUSTIN, WACO, TEMPLE AND PHARR, TEXAS, HAD NO PERTINENI INFORMATION. FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION REPORT SOURCES CONTACTED NEGATIVELY NOV. TWENTYFIVE INSTANT AI SAN ANTONIO. PCI J. C. STEPHENSON, PROPRIETOR, S • P• DRUG STORE AND NEWSTAND, SA SIX SIX FIVE DASH C, PCI VANCE FO BORDELON, GAMBLER, PCI CAESAR J. FERRIS, CAFE OWENER AND BARTENDER, FORMER SA FIVE SIX ZERO DASH C. ABOVE CONTACTED BY SA BRUNO F. DREYER. {(w) CONTACTED BY SA JOHN RUSSELL GRAHAM. PCI PHILLIP BORDONARO, TAVERN KEEPER, POI JACK PATRICK HANRATTY, GAMBLER, PCI ROBERT S. YARRINGTON RETIRED GAMBLER. FOLLOWING CONTACTED BY SA MORTON P. CHILES, JR. CAPTAIN ROBERT ALLEN, VICE SQUAD, SAN ANTONIO PD AND CHECK OF VICE END PAGE THREE DocId: 32279111 Page 3 --- ## Page 4 PAGE FOUR SQUAD RECORDS, PCI VINCENT L. LOCICERO, PCI WADE HANSEN, ente PCI HENRY CARTER, AND SA SIX SIX ZERO DASH C• CONTACTED NEGATIVELY AT AUSTIN, TEXAS, BY SA H. T. BURK. PCI MARY HALBOUTY, MANICURIST, FORMER POI MARION C. QUOTE SONNY UNQUOTE PEARSON, GAMBLER, FORMER PCI J.0 H. QUOTE DUDE UNQUOTE STEL FOR, CAMELER, AND AL SACHS, WENT CLUE 4) CONTACTED AT WACO, TEXAS, BY SA TO GO MC WILLIAMS, JR. LEONARD SIMPSON, PCI, CAPTIAN TOM BENNETT, DETECTIVE, WACO PD, HERBERT VAHRENKAMP, MC LENNAN COUNTY SO, DOLORES BARNES, RMA, JANE MARSTALLER, RECORDS SECTION, WACO PD. CONTACTED AT WACO BY SA WILLIAM H. BUCKLER. SAM ABDNOR, MANAGER, ELKS CLUB, KNOWN MEETING PLACE OF CENTRAL TEXAS GAMBLERS, RALPH GREENWOOD SALTER, PCI, AND ADMITTED PROFESSIONAL GAMBLER IN CENTRAL TEXAS AND HOT SPRINGS, ARKANSAS, AREAS FOR TWENTYFIVE YEARS • CONTACTED AT TEMPLE, TEXAS, BY SA O. LEE GOLDEN. CHARLES V. FLORA, PCI AND KNOWN GAMBLER, BARNEY HAM, PCI AND KNOWN GAMBLER, SA FIVE THREE EIGHT DASH C. END PAGE FOUR DocId: 32279111 Page 4 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10256-10298.pdf
104-10256-10298
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
06/17/1972
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
SDO
TOUR OF DUTY REPORT FROM SDO.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK46 : F6-B : 1998.01.11.13:45:56:700108 :
1
## Page 1 104-10256-10298 104415171 09 LEMORANDUM FOR : Chiei, Building Security Branc. FROM : SDO' s SUBJECT : Tour of Duty Report, 1700 - 0100 hours 1700 - Intered on duty. Reviewed current OSDO instructions, chrono file and previous tour of duty report.. 2. 1705 SB, inquiried if the keys to any rental cars had been leit in the OSDO. SDO advised Mr in the negative. GGS 1710 - Received backstop call on 356-5996 from Ken for Andrews. Message passed to fir. Smith. Call logged. WEC % 1720 - James Fearon, MDO, advised he can be reached via Pageboy #1l4 until further notice. WEG 56: 1740 - Sid Feders, CBS/NEWS, called to verify the former employment of Edward McCord. Obtained Mr. Feders telephone number and advised him the Special Ass't. would call him. Contacted and briefed Mr. Unumb who will handle. SDO will respond to SR&CD to run a name check. ,б. 1740 - Operations Center requested a name check on Edward Martin, who was involved in a demonstration at the Watergate and claimed to be employed by the Agency. After a check of SR&CD based on information available, SDO informed the Operations Center that the Subject had not been employed by the Agency. The same is true for item #5 and Mr. Unumb so advised. GGS WEG 1750 - Mr. Iszard, Med Psa/Do, advised that he can be reached via Page Boy #141 until further notice. WEC 8. 1755 - USSP Cumbow, Key Building, reported a possible violation in you 210, ext-3712. Advised USSP to impound the material and thai de SDO would respond. WEC 1805 - Mr. Van Damm, DD/Log, advised that he can be reached on 759-2712 after 1830 hours. WEC 70. 1825 - Mr. Dennis, SOD Support Staff, advised that he would be away from home for about an hour and would call when he returns. WEC 1825 - Mrs spouse of FE, requested that the SDO attempt to determine the location and ETA of her husband, who was enroute from Saigon. Contacted FE, and the CSDO who will handle. GGS C0o Coy TIT! ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10413-10064.pdf
104-10413-10064
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
1/1/64
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
RUSS HOLMES WORK FILE
OFFICE NOTES RE AGENTS
5
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK-RH08 : F150 : 20040324-1064325 :
5
## Page 1 GIN 104-10413-10064• dl (Teusó) (hiramias replatach Rogu Kuuguani - Johu fidontre hittauptlu-Fanando G-aatierricz Barrios A cin c DFS -Bt5: --- ## Page 2 13-00000 Poste 06 --- ## Page 3 13-00000. FITAMI/} 04 (Consuclo Especon) об - (201-330173) Sea. O Ranot, ie tered in (1970.) DoB (1909) Mhexicen eit. 30 yps in Gart. 08 Pang (201-79830) (Caro'" ferads.) Pradley CI/RB (uTAMiC/9) Quis ted Olkenu Suiti) - Ceultuas Gst du sns) buban boun in Spein @(1955) Hieplaued 04 i2/NN thc --- ## Page 4 13-00000. sd" isdf cAXesSg /02e6102080/ 04 701-798301 1. (Corlas JURADO?. .oi, 0б 1 Quis ALPißU Seuho - 329609) 3. Grieile ESPEicaN )04 PLIRInG 3 =241-330173) EEiTAmI9 (7): LICOOKIE = eie Calif- 6/rV --- ## Page 5 13-00000 . e."' ''". pe ...t/trt1:' Nxes arde 320450 6043assiarkea Stail inn.Cogee iraleae! . Iye tea Baub.na.. imwihia.cee Habat Mauel hoes in Mriarni) Lucie A. Dilleugas ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10063-10265.pdf
104-10063-10265
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
7/5/72
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CIA, HEADQUARTERS
MHCURB MHCHAOS
JOSEPH KRAFT LEFT PARIS FOR HANOI 1 JULY.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK10 : F6 : 20031216-1025846 :
1
## Page 1 1104-0063-10265) JuL 5 18 55272 SE CRE I ASISATZ JUL 72 RESTRICTED HANDLING CITE S 2592 HEADQUARTERS. RYBAT. MHCURB MACHAOS UNION ADVISED STA AND LNERGO 5 JULY FOLLOWINGS JOSEPH KRAFT LEFT PARIS FOR HANOS 1 JULY, JANE FONDA GRANTED VISA TO HANOI• THREE UNIDENTIFIED AMERICAN TRADE UNIONISTS WHO DUE ARRIVE PARIS SHORTLY ALSO AUTHORIZED VISIT NORTH VIEINAM.. EX-2, APDIR, WN-SISM. SECRET CLASSIFICATION REVIEW CONDUCTED ON. 12 APR 1976 / 2IMPDET CL BY.01.2170 WARNING NOTICE SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVEU ICLASSIFIED BY G8 505 EXEMPT FROM SERERAL DECLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE 0F E. Q. 11252, EXCEPTISH SATESCHY: 50C), C, (3) or (4) (dirate one or more) AUTOMATICALLY DECLASSIFIED ON Approval of DCI 10333 Maris 2604 10 Miles 12 1 Caram Adies: Bi die: Like=an MISE ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10100-10274.pdf
104-10100-10274
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
10/26/1963
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
201-289248
MEXICO CITY
DIRECTOR
FOOTLOCKER SHIPPED
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK33 : F6 : 1996.07.26.14:47:33:750075 :
1
## Page 1 104-10100-10274 03 CLASSIRED MET-S ORIG Wit dee EXT : : 7282 Far Ma C3 = 1:1 DATE :24 October 1903 To. :Mexico City FROM: DIRECTOR CONF: .,.3 INFO: (" 2, J1, RF: VR 1: 8c7? 1: 493 A7.0EN ! A TO dont irit. INFO MEXI 78235 REF: MEXI 6461 (IN 36742)* MICHNOFF SO LBS FOOTLOCKER SHIPPED VIA EASTERN AIRLINES. AIR WAYBILL NO. 007-DCA-209279• CONSIGNED TO MRS. HARRY CHANDLER AS EMB:: MANIFESTED AS USED PERSONAL, EFFECTE. SHIPPING HARGES NOT PREPAID. CONBINATION LOCK SET AT 32-13-26. END OF MESSAGE Oh. 1219 Exi. RAT*: 26 129x Fille itin 4MB SRE: RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce • Advise pessibility ait forgot one plece or MI CHOPP ME eroning clothing. sH/: bell It 03 WILl CHIl CUTERS W SUPPORT TRAG CHIEF, WN LOGISTICS AUTHENT RRRODUCTION DECRIES THAN THE 770 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
180-10131-10339.pdf
180-10131-10339
04/26/2018
Redact
HSCA
04/13/1978
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
014739
GOODPASTURE, ANN
155
HSCA
SECURITY CLASSIFIED TESTIMONY
3/12/18
Box 9
null
## Page 1 180-10131-10339 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 10/19/20 AGENCY: HSCA RECORD NUMBER: 180-10131-10339 RECORD SERIES : SECURITY CLASSIFIED TESTIMONY AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 014739 Document Information ORIGINATOR: HSCA FROM: GOODPASTURE, ANN TO : TITLE : DATE: PAGES: SUBJECTS : 04/13/1978 155 CIA, FILES CIA, METHODOLOGY OSWALD, LEE, POST RUSSIAN PERIOD, TRAVEL, TRIP TO MEXICO GOODPASTURE, ANN, TESTIMONY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE CIA, STAFF DOCUMENT TYPE: TRANSCRIPT CLASSIFICATION: Declassified RESTRICTIONS: 1B CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 02/01/2003 OPENING CRITERIA: COMMENTS : Box 9 v9.1 HW 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page --- ## Page 2 Stenographic Transcript 601 HEARINGS Belore be Subcommittee/on the Assassination of John Fo Kennedy of the SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSIMATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES • EXECUTIVE SESSION WashIngton .D.c Apг:1 136 1978 Alderson Reporting Company inC. Offioval Reporters 300 Seventh St. Sew Washington,D.C. 554.2345 --- ## Page 3 IONE : amt 1-1 EXECUTIVE SESSION THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 1978 HASHTNGTON, D. C. 20024 (202) 554-2395 12 13 REFORTER: SON PIN STREET 18 19 20 21 U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on the Assassina- tion of John F. Kennedy of the Select Committee on Assassinations, Washington, D.C. The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:15 a.m. in room 1310, Longworth House Office Building, Hon. Richardson Preyer (Chairman of the Subcommittee) presiding. Present: Representatives Preyer, Dodd, Fithian and Sawyer. Also present: G. R. Blakey, G. Cornwell, E. Berning, D. Hardway, B. Wolf, M. Goldsmith, R. Mörrison, R. Cenzman, K. Klein and W. Cross. MI. Preyer. | The Committee will come to order. The Chair recognizes the clerk of the Committee to read us a record of those members who are officially designated to be on the Subcommittee today, pursuant to Committee Rule 12.3. 21 25 The Clerk. Mr. Chairman, you, Mr. Thone, Mr. Sawyer and Mr. Dodd are regular members of the Subcommittee. Mr. Fithian will be substituting for Mrs. Burke. 001143 MEGEREON RETORTING GUMPANY IC NN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 3 --- ## Page 4 1-2 2 3 ÷ ITH STREET, s.H. REPORTELS MELDING, MAGMINICTON. n. C 20021 (202) 10 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 Mr. Preyer. Thank you. The Chair will entertain a motion to go into Executive Session at this time. Mr. Sawyer. I so move, Mi. Chairman. MI. Preyer. There has been a motion that today's hearing, one that the hearing be held in Executive Session. This is on the basis that information obtained by the Committee, that the evidence or testimony may tend to degrade or incriminate people. The Clerk will call the roll on the motion. The Clerk. Mr. Preyer? Mr. Preyer. Aye. The Clerk, Mr. Thone? (No response) The Clerk. Mr. Sawyer? MI. Sawyer. Aye. The Clerk. Mr. Dodd? (No response) The Clerk. Mr. Fithian? Mr. Fithian. Aye. Thei Clerk. Three ayes, MI. Chairman. MI. Preyer. The meeting is declared closed and the room will be cleared of all unauthorized personnel. Are you ready to call the witness at this time? Mr. Goldsmith. I have some statements. I would like to 001144 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 4 --- ## Page 5 1-3 2 3 make off the record: (Discussion off the record.) Mr. Fithian. Would the witness please stand to be SWOIn? 300 7TI STREET, s.W. REPORTERS NUTLOTIG MASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 551-2345 5 Ms. Goodpasture. I have one problem. I cannot hear. Mr. Fithian. Can you hear if I come through at this 7 8 9 level? 10 12 13 14 15 Ms. Goodpastrue. Yes. I use a hearing aid. It is not always reliable. I do not want you to waste my time and I do not want to waste too much of yours. Mr. Fithian. We will need to swear you in, Ms. Good- pasture. Ms. Goodpasture. Do you want me to stand? Mr. Fithian. Yes, please stand. Do you swear thatethe information you are about to give to this Committee is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 001145 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 5 --- ## Page 6 1-4 3 20024 (202) 551-2345 5 10 1TH STREET, s.w. REPOSIT: 12 13 74 • 15 1á 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 23 TESTIMONY OF ANN GOODPASTURE Mr. Goldsmith. Would you state your name and address for the record? Ms. Goodpastrue. My name is Ann Goodpasture. My local address is with friends in Maryland, 5600 Bridgeview. My mailing address, at the moment, is in care of my father in Livingstone, Tennessee. MI. Fithian. If I may, now that we have your name on the record and your address, I would like to explain our proceedings here, Miss Goodpasture. The House Resolution 222, under which this Subcommittee acts, mandates that the Committee conduct a full and complete investigation and study of the circumstances surrounding the assassination and the death of President John F. Kennedy including determining whether the existing laws of the United States concerning the protection of the President and the investigatory jurisdiction and capability of agencies and departments are adequate in their provisions and enforcement; and whether there was full disclosure of evidence and informa- tion among agencies and departments of the United States government; and whether any information or evidence not in theppossession of an agency or department would have been of assistance in investigating the assassination; and why such information was not provided or collected by that agency or department; and to make recommendations to the House, if the 001146 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 6 --- ## Page 7 1-5 3 20029 (202) 554-2345 7 ₴ REPORTERS 1011.0196, WASHINGTON, 10 ! 1 12 300 ITH STREET 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 Select Committee deems it appropriate, for the amendment of existing legislation or the enactment of new legislation. I would like, because of the special expertise of this witness, if counsel will withhold for just a moment, say a word of two about the process that we are engaged in. First, we commend you for your long years of service to a very, very important agency of this government. I: personally was a part of that in a very, very small way in the Navy a long time ago, and I commend you for your dedica- tion and your experience and what has come to be your reputa tion for, as we have talked with other members of the agency, they have referred to you as sort of the touchstone, or the person who was the expert among the experts. I want to say also that I personally want to commend our Chief Counsel, Professor Blakey, and our assistant counsels for their long and dilligent effort to build a relationship with the agencies which is now beginning to be extremely productive and fruitful in our whole process of trying to get all the information and to lay the matter of the assassination of the President of the United States to rest permanently with the complete story. I just wanted you to know that we have been working with the CIA and the FBI and they have been very cooperative with us as well as the State Department in the two investi- gations in which we are now engaged, and I look forward to 001147 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. 17 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 7 --- ## Page 8 1-6 2 3 S ann 7TH STRET S.W. REPONTERS MALDING, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 10 1z 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 your testimony today as a person of longstanding and long experience with one of the key agencies in the United States government and hope that we can proceed today to fit in some pieces of the mosaic that we are trying to assemble. Counsel may proceed. Mr. Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, have you received a copy of the Committee Rules and the Committee Resolution? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, you gave me a copy yesterday. MI. Goldsmith. What is your present employment status, Miss Goodpasture? Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? MT.. Goldsmith. What is your present employment status, Miss Goodpasture? Ms • Goodpastrue. I am retired. Mr. Goldsmith. Were you formerly employed with the Central Intelligence Agency? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes: Mr. Goldsmith. What was your term of service with the CIA? 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. What was my term of service? Mr. Goldsmith. How many years were you with the CIA? Ms: Goodpasture.. Over 31. Mr. Goldsmith. At this time, I would like to refer to Exhibit 94. Would the Clerk please hand that to the witness? Miss Goodpasture -- 001148 ALCERSON REPORTINO CONFANY, INC HH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 8 --- ## Page 9 1-7 2 3 J00 9TH STREET. S.H. REPORTERS BUCIDING, HASHINGTON, D. С 3 15 17 8 17 20 23 21 25 Ms. Goodpasture. I read this yesterday. Mr. Goldsmith. - Exhibit No. 94 is a copy of a letter written by the present Director of Central Intelligence to the Chairman of this Committee. I believe a copy was given to you yesterday, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Did you read that letter yesterday? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes: Mr. Goldsmith. Did you understand that letter? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated that you worked with the Central Intelligence Agency for 31 years. Which branch within the CIA did you work for? Ms. Goodpasture. For the entire length of time? MI. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms. Goodpasture. Well, I worked for a number of different branches, but most of the time I was outside of the United States and it came under what is now called the Director of Operations, or clandestine service.. I suppose that would be a more appropriate term. Mr. Goldsmith Fine. When did you retire from the CIA? Ms. Goodpasture. I think it was in June, 1973. Mr. Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, I am drawing your attention to 1963. Where were you stationed at that time? 001149 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 9 --- ## Page 10 1-8 2 3 REFORTERS BUSTDTNG VAGMINCTON: D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 3 Ms . Goodpasture. Where was I stationed at that time? Mr. Goldsmith. YeS. Ms. Goodpasture. Here in Washington. Oh, 1963? Excuse me. Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms. Goodpasture. I thought you said '73. I was stationed in Mexico City. MI. Goldsmith. In what capacity were you stationed in Mexico City? Ms. Goodpasture. I was a staff employee of the CIA 10 1! 12 13 14 15 300 7TH STRET 17 18 1.9 20 21 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith. What were your responsibilities as a staff employee at that time? Ms. Goodpasture. I worked as a case officer on liaison projects with the Mexicans and liaison with other government agencies represented in the Embassy. I did routine clerical office functions, originating correspondence, answering correspondence. Mr. Goldsmith. What type of liaison work did you do with the Mexican government? Ms. Goodpasture. What type of -= 1,00 wade die gon Mr. Golsmith.- liaison work did you do with the Mexican government. Ms. Goodpasture, What type of inside? Mr. Goldsmith, Liaison. You indicated that you did 001150 ALGERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HH 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 10 --- ## Page 11 1-9 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2345 7 8 10 7T11 STREET, s.1. REFORDCES MICIDING, 12 i3 15 16 17 13 19 20 liaison work with the Mexican govemment. Ms. Goodpasture. Electronic surveillance. Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the Chief of Station? Ms. Goodpasture. Winston Scott. Mr. Goldsmith. Is it appropriate to refer to you as having been Winston Scott's righthand man during your term of service in Mexico City? Ms. Goodpasture. I take exception to that. First of all, I am not a man; and second, I think that his righthand person was his Deputy who participated in all the decision making processes, which I did not, and acted for Mr. Scott in his absence. A lot of people said that I was Winn's right hand because e at times he asked me to do things for him that. he did not ask other people to do. He depended upon me for certain projects that he managed, or he wanted to manage, and I did the legwork for it. I would not say that I was his right hand in the entire station. Mr. Goldsmith. How many years. did you work in Mexico City? 23 24 23 Ms: Goodpasture. Mr. Goldsmith. entire time? Ms. Goodpasture. Eleven. Were you working with Mr. Scott that Yes. He was there first, 001151 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 11 --- ## Page 12 1-10 2 3 n.C. 20024 (202) 551-2315 S 3 10 З00 7T11 STREET S.W. RI:PORTERS BUILDING, 12 13 14 •15 17. 18 17 20 21 23 24 25 Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated that you were not involved in the actual decision-making process. Were YOu privy. to the actual decision-making process? Ms. Goodpasture. It depended upon what it concerned. If it was a project that I worked on, I participated in it, but if it were a station activity, I did not. Mr. Goldsmith. Did youwork at the station in Mexico City also involve occasionally making contact with CIA agents in the field? Ms • Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. Would you give the Congressional panel an evaluation of Winn Scott's competence as the Chief of Station? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, I think that he was a very conscientious man, he was a hardworking man, he expected everyone else. to do their work, he worked long hours. Some people felt, or expressed the opinion, in my presence, that he was a hard worker and expected too much from employees, but I do not think that that was really the case. He was a very conscientious man, an intelligent man. He obviously had the intelligence for the post, or he would not have been assigned there. MI. Goldsmith. Is the Mexico City station one of the largest CIA stations in operation? Ms. Goodpasture, At the present time, I do not know. 001152 WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 12 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC --- ## Page 13 1-11 2 3 30n STREET, . H, REPONTERS BUTIDING. HASHINGTON, n.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 ó 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 2 1 23 24 25 At that time, it was one of the largest ones in Latin America, but not in comparison to the other places. I could not comment on the size of the other places. Mr. Goldsmith. What kind of attitude did Mr. Scott have towards the importance of files and recordkeeping systems at the Mexico City station? Ms. Goodpasture. He was very conscientious. He wanted them maintained accurately and completely. Mr. Goldsmith. How long were the files that he main- tained preserved? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, I am not too sure about that. They were there up until the time that I left, but I think that there was a reduction because of space in 1969. 'The files were cut back, but I do not have firsthand knowledge of that because I did not participate in it. Mr. Goldsmith. During the time that you were in Mexico City with Mr. Scott, to your knowledge was anything ever thrown out of destroyed from the Mexico City station files? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, several things were destroyed that were not considered of any value as far as the work at that time was concerned. We looked at it more or less like keep cash register receipts for a grocery bill. There was a limitation of space on just how long you could keep certain things. But there were no documents that were a part of the 001153 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC WH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 13 --- ## Page 14 3 20024 ( 202) 551-2345 ó 3 300 7TH1 STREET, REPORTERS BUILDING, MASHTHCTON, 10 12 13 74 15 Té 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 1-12 official files that could be destroyed without a certificate of destruction being made. That did not apply to our rough notes that we made, but you could not take a file out, go through it and tear it up because you did not like something in it. Mr. Goldsmith. It has been said of Mr. Scott that during his tenure in Mexico City not even a shred of paper was thrown out or moved from the Mexico City station files. would you say that is an accurate statement? Ms. Goodpasture. Some of the rough paper was thrown out, the rough paper that he considered supporting data for a dispatch that he had written or a cable that he sent, he kept. He insisted that other people do the same thing. Mr. Goldsmith, Fine. At this time, I am going to get into the area of the surveillance operations in Mexico City. Miss Goodpasture, what kinds of surveillance operations did the CIT have in Mexico City in 1963 with respect to the Soviet and Cuban consulate and embassies? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, we had electronic surveillance, wiretaps, which covered telephone conversations. Mr. Goldsmith, If I may interrupt you for a moment, could you possibly raise the mike closer to your mouth so that we might hear you better? Ms. Goodpasture. We had electronic surveillance, 001154 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. NN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 14 --- ## Page 15 1-13 2 3 5 ó 7 ₴ 300 7T11 STREET. s.W. REPORTERS MUTINING, MASHLICTON, D.C. 20029 10 11 12 13 15 17 19 2 22 23 24 25 wiretaps on the telephones in the Soviet Embassy, and we had photographic surveillance. There was also what they called foot surveillance at times, when people were interested, they could find out where they were staying, where they went from the Soviet Embassy. Mt. Goldsmith. That would be physical surveillance? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. Turning first to the area of photographic surveillance, what was the purpose of the photographic surveillance project with regard to the Soviet and Cuban embassies and consuls? Ms. Goodpasture. My understanding of that was that it was to be used to identify those people who might be working for the Soviets as espionage agents who were U.s. citizens who went down there driving a car with a U.S. license plate on it, or people we did not know but could identify. The same procedure was also used for trying to identify people other than U.S. citizens, but it was concentrated in the beginning on license plates or numbers, or something that could be identified. MI. Goldsmith. An attempt would be made to take pic- tures of both the car, license plates and the occupants of the car, is that correct? Ms . Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. 001155 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 15 --- ## Page 16 1-14 3 5.l. REFORTERS NUTIOTNG, MACHINERON. D. C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 ó 7 10 12 13 15 7 18 19 20 2! 23 24 23 Turning now to the photographic surveillance operation with regard to the Soviet Embassy and consulate, I would like to ask you, what role, if any, did you play with regards to this surveillance operation during 1963? Ms. Goodpasture. In 1963, I was more or less a bystander of that operation because the operation, at times, was conducted by another case officer: I screened and looked at the photographs because I had been there in the early part of the operation where the photograph bases were first set up, were first used. I had an interest in them, or looked at them to see that they were in focus, that the negatives were all printed, and Mr. Scott asked me to do that because I had been a commercial. photographer before. I went to work for the goverment. MI. Goldsmith, Are you saying, in 1963, your r01l with regard to the photographic surveillance at the Soviet Embassy was to review photographs, essentially to evaluate their quality? Ms, Goodpasture. Their technical quality. Mr. Goldsmith, Not for the purpose of obtaining subse quent information from the photographs? Ms. Goodpasture, No, because, at that time, by 1963 there was a staff there who had been assigned to work on Soviet matters and it was their function to investigate the leads - we called them leads -- to try to identify the person 001156 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. NN 50955 DocId:32277221 Page 16 --- ## Page 17 1-15 2 3 ITH STREET, S.W. REPORTERS BUCIDING, MASHINICION, o. C. 20024 (202) 55k 234 7 10 '1 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 at the Soviet embassy they were interested in. So all the raw material went to them. I usually took a quick look at the photographs when they came in, and if I noticed anything significant about them, I mentioned it to the Soviet case officer, but he gave the formal reporting on all the Soviet information. Mr. Goldsmith. I understand. How many cameras were in operation with regard to the photosurveillance of the Soviet Embassy and consulate? Ms: Goodpasture. Three. There were three, generally. There could be any number. if we wanted to put some on the street, but at that time, I think there were only three. MI. Goldsmith. Where were these cameras located? Ms. Goodpasture. Where? Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms. Goodpasture. They were located around the building. the embassy building, to cover the area in the yard and in the front gate. Mr. Goldsmith. So the cameras were situated so that they would photograph the yard area and front entrance gate? Ms . Goodpasture. Yes Mr. Goldsmith. During this period, was your role with regards to this project at any time of a supervisory nature, actually supervising the project? Ms. Goodpasture. Informally it could have been interpreted 001157 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 17 --- ## Page 18 1-16 2 3 5 7 8 10 13 13 17 300 19 20 23 24 in that way, but I never had the responsibility for them alone. MI. Goldsmith. As a practical matter, you were acting in an informal supervising capacity? Ms. Goodpasture. It could have been interpreted that way by some of the people, because they would come to me and bring me photographs and say, what do you think of this, do you think that this is a latin, or do you think he has ever been to the Soviet Embassy before. Mr. Goldsmith. In your own opinion do you think you were acting, at least infomally, in a supervisory capacity with regards to this project? Ms, Goodpasture. No. Mr. Goldsmith. At this time, I would like for the witness to be given Stack C of the documents that have been prepared. (Pause) I would like to draw your attention to page 2 of the documents that appear in Stack C. Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to ask you if you can identify that document. Ms, Goodpasture. This looks like a copy of a cable sent from the Mexico station on the 8th of October. Mr. Goldsmith. To whom would the cable have been sent? 001158 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC NH 50955 Doold: 32277224 Page 18 --- ## Page 19 1-17 2 3 30n ITH STREET S.l. REFORTERS KULDING CASINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 5516-2345 12 13 15 17. 18 19 20 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. It was sent to Washington. MI. Goldsmith. CIA Headquarters? Ms. Goodpasture. CIA Headquarters. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to have you examine the cable in more detail. I call your attention to the first paragraph. What does the term "the envoy" mean? Ms: Goodpasture. What was that again? Mr. Goldsmith.: I am sorry. I am drawing your atten- tion to the first paragraph. Ms• Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. The second word -- Ms. Goodpasture. Page two? Mr. Goldsmith. Page two. There appears a word "the envoy." What does that word . me an? Ms. Goodpasture. That was a cryptonym to identify the telephone surveillance. Instead of saying a telephone tap operation we used crytonyms for all of the things that involved assets outside that could be identified. MI. Goldsnith. I am not drawing your attention to the upper lefthand corner of this document. There appears the word "orig." Whät does that stand for? Ms. Goodpasture, The person who wrote the cable. MI. Goldsmith. Does that stand for originating officer? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. You say the originating officer is the 001159 HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 19 ALGERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. ING. --- ## Page 20 1-18 2 3 SON IT! STREET, 5.V. REPORTERS BUILDING, MASHINGTON, n. C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 10 12 13. 14 15 17 18 17 20 23 24 person who wrote the cable, correct? Ms. Goodpasture. In this case, it is. Mr. Goldsmith. Who was identified in this document as the originating officer. Ms. Goodpasture. The originating officer is Mr. Herbert Minell. Mr. Goldsmith. Please listen to my questions carefully and just answer my questions. I think you may be trying to anticipate. Who is identified in the upper lefthand corner as the person who issued the document? What name is given? Does it say Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Is the term a pseudonym? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. It is a pseudonym for Herbert Minell? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. I take it that these documents commonly used pseudonymns, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. In almost all cases that was the practice. Mr. Goldsmith. What would be the purpose of using a pseudonym? Ms, Goodpasture. In case the document happened to fall outside classified control, it would be meaningless to the 001160 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 20 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 21 1-19 2 3 30л ITH STREET, 5.11. REPORTERS AUILDING MASHINGTON, n. C. 2002% (202) 551-2345 5 ó 7 3 people who picked it up than if the true name were on it. Mr. Goldsmith. I understand. Let us take a look at the lower righthand corner of this same document. It says, releasing officer. What is a releasing officer? Ms. Goodpasture. W. C. Curtis. That was a pseudonym for Winston Scott. MI. Goldsmith. Understood. What is a releasing officer? What are his responsibil- 10 !! 12 13 ities? 15 16 17 18 17 20 21 22 23 24 Ms. Goodpasture. The supervisor, the person who decides that the message should be sent; generally the releasing offi cer is the chief, the senior person there at the time, the person who will assume responsibility for the message after it has been transmitted. MI. Goldsmith. The message would go -- Ms. Goodpasture. For instance, in an Embassy, if a document goes to the communications center signed by someone who is not the senior person in the section, they will not send it; just everybody cannot take a message to the message center and say, send this cable to Washington. So this is to make sure that the Chief of the Section knows that is going on by everybody in his section. Mr. Goldsmith, I would not like to draw your attention to page 5 of Stack C. That pertains to a different cable, but 001161 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 21 ALDERSON REPORTNO COMPANY, INC --- ## Page 22 1-20 2 3 7 REPONTERS QUIDDING, NASHTUCTON, n. C. 20024 10 1 12 13 15 15 17 STREEP 19 20 23 24 23 simply for the purpose of clarifying terminology, I would like you to look at the lower righthand corner where it says, "Authenticating Officer." What is an authenticating officer? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, this cable originated in Washington and in Washington there are more than one chief, so the person who signs off on it - it may be a Branch Chief. In this case, it was the Division Chief. He approved sending the cable and then his superior released it. MI. Goldsmith.. So the authenticating officer woüld be someone under the releasing officer, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, to be sure about that, you would have to check with the communications people on their practices, but I think that sometimes it could be the same. If the authenticating officer were the Section Chief, then the Section Chief could also release the message. Mr. Goldsmith, Were you ever an authenticating officer? Ms. Goodpasture. No. Well, I have signed off on cables going out from Headquarters at times, I am sure. MI, Goldsmith.. • Only from Headquarters? Ms. Goodpasture. The fact that you sign there as an authenticating officer does that mean that that is a title, It means that you were the person who were probably best informed on that subject, I think. 001162 WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 22 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 23 1-21 2 3 7 21'11 STREET, 5.V1. REPORTERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON, n. C. 2002% 10 !! 12 13 15 17 19 20 ?1 23 24 MI. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, is it the responsibility of the authenticating officer to verify the contents of the cable? Ms. Goodpasture. It might be, I do not know. Mr. Goldsmith. What would the specific purpose of an authenticating officer be? Ms. Goodpasture. I never went into that terminology with anyone. Mr.Fithian. Would the counsel permit a question? Mr Goldsmith. Yes, sir. Mr. Fithian. In our Navy communications sytem, we sometimes distinguished between an authenticating officer as one who not only authorized the sending of the cable, but authenticated or verified or vouched for, the content. Is that similar? Ms. Goodpasture. That would be the literal interpre tation of the word. Whether ornot it was used in air traffic. all the time or not, I do not know.: My guess would be that that is correct. MI. Fithian. Do you know whether, in CIA traffic, you had to have both an authenticating officer and a releasing officer for a single message? Ms. Goodpasture. I think that there were times when one person could sign both places. Mr, Fithian. Thank you, counsel, 001163 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC. NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 23 --- ## Page 24 2 3 MASATICTON. D.0. 2002% (202) 554-2345 10 12 15 300 7TH STREET, 17 18 19 20 21 1-22 Mr. Goldsmith. Would the phrase authenticating officer appear only on cable traffic that originated at headquarters? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. You would have to compare the field forms and headguarters forms to be sure of that MI. Goldsmith. On those occasions when you acted as authenticated officer, did you see your purpose as being that of verifying the contents of the cable for accuracy? Ms, Goodpasture.™ Yes.: it at torti Mr. Goldsmithin I would like, to go now to page 2: of. the documents contained in Stack C and I would like you to read the second paragraph. (Pause) Ms • Goodpasture, Yes. Mx. Goldsmith, Was the photograph referred to in this paragraph obtained by the CIA's photo surveillance operation of the Soviet Embassy? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. Well, this message has a mistake in it which was not noted at that time in paragraph 2, and that is the date, Mr. Goldsmith, We will get to that later on to clarify that. 23 24 25 would you tell the Committee what the scope of the coverage of the Soviet Embassy and consulate was? By that, I mean in September and October, 1963, at what times were the 001164 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. NY 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 24 --- ## Page 25 1-23 3 REPORTERS BUDDING, MACHINOTON, n. C. 20024 554-2345 ó 3 = !! 12 13 Soviet Embassy and consulate under surveillance? Ms. Goodpasture. I cannot give you the exact times. I can guess, and my guess is that they were open most of the time when the consulate was opened for business hours. But the person who would have that information, the only person who would know, is the case officer who was handling the project at that time. Mr. Goldsmith. Even though you were acting in what you regard as an informal supervisory capacity, you do not recall? Ms. Goodpasture. No, because a year ago I tried to find that specific information from the records and I could not find it; and I do not know. I am sorry. I cannot answer that. 15 7TH STREET, 17 18 19 20 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith, Fine. I am sorry; It has just been drawn to my attention that we should clarify - Ms: Goodpasture. I did not answer that paragraph 2. I noticed that. Photograph, yes. That was my fault, not yours. I wanted to correct that date so you would not get the impres- sion that there was a photograph on the lst of October because the photograph was made on the 2nd of October, but it was made by the surveillance from the Soviet Embassy. MI. Goldsmith, Fine. You indicated that the scope of the coverage, to your 001165 ALCERSON REFERTINE COMPANY. INC. WW. 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 25 --- ## Page 26 1-24 2 3 knowledge, was probably at such time as the soviet Embassy and consulate was open, in other words, working hours. Is that correct, to the best of your knowledge? Ms. Goodpasture. I think that it was at working hours. Mr. Goldsmith. What were the working hours of the soviet Embassy and consulate in September and October, 1963? Ms. Goödpasture.: I do not know. MI. Goldsmith. How many years did you work in Mexico City? REPORTERS BULLOING VASHINGTON, 10 !! 12 13 15 300 PTH STREET, 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. Eleven. MI. Goldsmith. Working in Mexico City for eleven years and you do not know what the working hours were? Ms . Goodpasture. The Soviet Embassy changed their working hours frequently. Their consulate might be open from 8:00 to 10:00 on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays or they might change it from 10:00 to 12:00 on Tuesdays and Thursdays. But for me to say now that in September, 1963, without having a document to prove it; that they were open from 10:00 to 12:00 would be rather foolish because I really do not know what their hours were at that time. MI. Goldsmith. Let us refer to a document, then. Will the Clerk hand the witness Stack D? Drawing your attention to page 3 - Ms, Goodpasture. Right. MI. Goldsmith. In Stack D, can you identify this 001166 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 26 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 27 1-25 3 554-2345 7 300 PIU STREET s.W. REPORTERS NUCLDING, MASHSICTON, 10 12 13 15 15 18 20 21 23 24 25 NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 27 document? Ms. Goodpasture. It looks like a cable that was sent to Mexico. MI. Goldsmith. Is that cable 9332? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to ask you to read the first paragraph of that cable. Ms. Goodpasture. It has the normal work hours there. Mr. Goldsmith. Does this cable accurately reflect what the normal working hours were of the Soviet Embassy? Ms. Goodpasture, I do not know. The work hours are listed here, but I do not know who originated this cable. MT . Goldsmith. Who was the authenticating officer on this cable? Ms. Goodpasture. I did, but I could not find this message last year. Mr. Goldsmith. The answer to the question who the authenticating officer was is you? Ms: Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith, there on page 4 it indicates that the authenticating officer was Ms. Goodpasture. That was my pseudo. MI. Goldsmith, In light of the fact that you were the authenticating Ms, Goodpasture. I do not have a memory of the specific 0011677 ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC --- ## Page 28 1-26 2 3 П. С. 20024 (2012) 551-2345 3 .3 10 ! 1 i2 13 З00 PTI STREET. S.l. RETORTERS 15 17 18 1 20 23 24 23 hours at that time. MI. Goldsmith. I would like, at this point, to refer your attention to page 1 of the documents contained in Stack D. I would like to ask you to read the first two para- graphs. (Pause) Ms. Goodpasture. The first paragraph? MI. Goldsmith. It is labelled up top, memo to Mr. Popitch at FBI. I think that it is the stack that we just put by your right hand. I would like to ask you to read the first two paragraphs. Ms. Goodpasture. The first paragraph? Mr. Goldsmith. The first two paragraphs. (Pause) Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Does the information contained in this document contradict the information that is contained disregard that question. The question I have now is, according to this document, it appears that the photograph surveillance was of a continu ous: nature during daylight hours. Ms. Goodpasture. No. Mr. Goldsmith. What I am saying, according to this document, the photograhpic surveillance of the Soviet Embassy and consulate was of a continuous nature during daylight 001168 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 28 ALGERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC --- ## Page 29 1-27 hours: 2 3 LaGUTHCTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 7 10 11 12 13 300 7TH STREET S. 11. REPORTERS 15 17 18 19 20 21 73 21 Ms • Goodpasture. We are talking about two different things here. The surveillance, someone was available there, but they did not make pictures. They may have been watching the activity from 9:00 o'clock in the morning until 1:00 o'clock. and may have only made two pictures, one at 11:00 and one at 12:00. As far as photographic surveillance being continuous, that would be really inaccurate because it was not a camera making a picture of every minute's activity. Mr. Goldsmith, However, there were personnel stationed at positions outside the Soviet Embassy compound who had photographic equipment available and ho could take pictures at any time during daylight hours, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know whether it would be or not. At any time during daylight hours? Mr. Goldsmith. I am drawing your attention to the second paragraph of this document, page 1, the very first sentence of that paragraph. It says the photographic coverage of the mentioned installations is of a continuous nature during daylight hours. Is that an accurate statement? Ms• Goodpasture. I think in November of 1973 -- Mr. Goldsmith. *63. Ms, Goodpasture, " after the assassination, the case officers ordered their people to be on duty continuously, I 001169 HH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 29 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 30 1-28. am not sure of that. That probably may have prompted this statement 2 3 Mr. Goldsmith. This documented is dated November 27, 1963. 5 7 3 STREET, S.V. REPORTERS BUILDING, WASHENGTON, D. C. 10 •12 13 15 1ó 17 20 21 ?3 21 25 Ms. Goodpasture. Yes: Mr. Goldsmith. Is that correct? Ms . Goodpasture. That is the date that is on the document: MI. Goldsmith, This document seems to indicate, does it not, that the photographic coverage of the installations was of a continuous nature during daylight hours. Is that correct? Ms, Goodpasture. That is what the document says here. MI. Goldsmith. This was a document that was given to the FBI by the CIA. Is the information contained in this document accurate as far as that specific sentence is concerned? Ms. Goodpasture. I assume it is. This memorandum was written in Washington, though, at headquarters. MI. Goldsmith. In your previous answer, you seemed to be suggesting that this document referred to the coverage of the embassies after November 22, 1963. I am referring to the period of September-October 163. Ms, Goodpasture. I think that this memorandum was written to tell them the coverage that had been instituted 001170 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 30 --- ## Page 31 • 1-29 2 3 300 ! 7TH S.V. REPORTERS BUILDING. MASHMIGTON, D.C. 20024(202) 554-2345 S after the assassination. Mr. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, to the best of your knowledge, what was the scope of the photographic surveillance of the Soviet Embassy in September and October 1963? 3 .10 Ms. Goodpasture, What is that? MI. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, to the best of your knowledge, what was the photographic -- what was: the scope of the photographic surveillance coverage of the Soviet Embassy and consulate in September and October, 1963? 2 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. During the hours that that office would have been opensto receive visitors from the public. Mr. Goldsmith. Would the clerk please now hand to the witness the stack labelled A? Stack A contains actually four sub-stacks, A-l. A-2, A-3 and A-4, I would like to draw your attention to Stack A-3. Ms. Goodpasture. Page 3? Mr. Goldsmith. Stack A-3, one of the stacks contained in Stack A. Ms. Goodpasture. What page? Mr" Goldsmith. It is a separate sub-stack within the overall Stack A Has your attention now been drawn to Stack A-3? : 001171 ALDERSON REPORTING COMFANY. INC. NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 31 --- ## Page 32 1-30 2 3 MACHTICTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 ó ₴ 10 !! 12 13 74 15 TTU STREET, vi REPORTERS 17 18 20 2} 23 24 25 Ms • Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. Can you identify the document that appears on Stack A-3? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI (Goldsmith, What is that document? Ms. Goodpasture. This is a memorandum, a rough draft, that I wrote from memory when I came to Washington a year ago to be used as background material to try to get together the information about what was the situation in Mexico at the time of Oswald's visit and the assassination and to name people who were there that we could talk to and locate their records and get as complete a report as we could on what. happened there. Mr. Goldsmith. Of all the available personnel from Mexico City, why were you specifically asked to prepare this memo randum? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think anybody else was will- ing to do it. Mr. Goldsmith. Is it possible that you were asked to preparethis memorandum because you had more information concerning this issue? Ms. Goodpasture. No, I was asked to do it because the man who was reviewing it had never been at the Mexico station and it is just as though he was asked to write a report on this committee, that he wanted someone that had been in Mexico, 001172 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 32 • ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 33 2 3 554-2345 é 7 2002% PTI STREET, 5.11 PEPORTERS RUTIDING, MaCHINGTON. 10 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 13 24 25 1-31 Mr. Goldsmith. Before we proceed, I would like to ask you, Miss Goodpasture, to wait until I have finished asking my question, and although you may have answered the question I was asking, I would like to ask it again. Why were you specifically chosen to prepare this memo randum? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. Mr. Goldsmith. Was anybody else from the Mexico City station who served with you in 1963 asked to prepare similar memoranda? Ms. Goodpasture. I was told that all of the people who were there at the time would be interviewed and would be asked to do the same thing that I was asked to do. Mr. Goldsmith. To your knowledge, did they? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. I did not see any of the results, but that does not mean that they did not. Mr. Goldsmith. Are you familiar with the CIA's Inspec- toI General Report of 1977? Ms. Goodpasture. The CIA what? MI. Goldsmith.: Inspector General's Report of 1977? Among other things, it dealt with the question of the surveil- lance operation of Cuban and Soviet Embassies in Mexico City in 1963. Ms. Goodpasture. I am sorry. I am going to have to ask you to repeat that because there is a word in there at the 001173 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DooId:32277224 Page 33 --- ## Page 34 1-32 beginning I am not sure I understood. Did you say secretarial board? 2 3 20024 (202) 554-231 5 10 Mr. Goldsmith. No, I did not. I will try to speak up and to clarify my questions for you. Why do we not defer that until later on? I would like to address your attention to page 19 of this document. (Pause) What appears on page 19 of this document? What infor- mation appears on page 19 of this document? Ms. Goodpasture. There is a list of names and dates. Mr. Goldsmith. What are the names and dates related 12 13 to? REPORTiNG ITH STREET, 15 1á 17 13. 19 20 ?! Ms. Goodpasture. There were related to people who were, or who I thought, could have been in Mexico at that time, but this document was never checked. I did this, I tried to do this from memory and it was to be checked from the personnel records for accuracy as well as the other memorandum that you have. 23 24 What we have here is my rough draft and there may be some names of people who were not there. Mr. Goldsmith. I understand we are only going to focus this time on a few of the names. Drawing your attention to the middle of the page where it says "unilateral photo, soviets," do you see that? 001174 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC NN 50955 DocId: 32277224. Page 34 --- ## Page 35 1-33 2 3 20024 (202) 551-2345 7 ₴ MACITHCTON. 10 12 13 300 ITH STREET, S. 1. REPORTERG 15 16 18 20 21 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. YeS. Mr. Goldsmith. Is your name mentioned under that category? MS .. Goodpasture. My name was there in the initial status. Mr. Goldsmith. I think the question calls for a yes or no answer. Was your name -- Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. This was in a report that you prepared, is that correct? Ms. Goödpasture.' That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. It says Goodpasture, alternate CO in internal routing. What does that mean? Mr. Goodpasture. That means that during the time that Harry Mahoney was there, when the base was first set up, I was his alternate case officer and I did the internal routing for the Soviet photographs. My tenure lasted much longer. I kept an interest in the Soviets - I mean in the photographs. When the other people were away on holidays I could meet with their contact and pick up the photographs and route them. Sometime in 1964, I had nothing more to do with photo- graphs. Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Mahoney left in April, 1959, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? 001175 IN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 35 ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 36 1-34 2 3 7 Mr. Goldsmith. MI. Mahoney left, according to this, roughly in April, 1959. Ms. Goodpasture. That is approximate. I am not sure of the date. Mr. Goldsmith. Understood. However, you continued working in this particular capacity through 1964. Is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Only when the other people were away, I met someone outside. That was the function of the alternate JON ITH STREET, S.W. REPORTERS BUILDING, MASHINGTON, 10 !1 12 13 CO. 15 17 -20 23 21 23 Mr. Goldsmith. What was responsibility in regards to this project? Ms. Goodpasture. He was a case officer. MI. Goldsmith. According to page 19, he served in that capacity from June '63 until October '64, is that correct? Ms• Goodpasture. I think so. Mr. Goldsmith. When you say case officer, you mean case officer with regard to the Soviet Embassy photosurveil lance coverage? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that when received the materials from the photosurveillance operation he would turn them over, either to you or to Herbert Minell? Ms. Goodpasture. He sometimes brought the photographs in to me and I gave them to Herb Minell. On other occasions, 001176 ALGERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. NN 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 36 --- ## Page 37 1-35 2 3 he would give it to Herb Minnel directly. Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that responsibility in this area was simply to do the leg work on the project, that he himself was not really in chargé of the project? Ms. Goodpasture. NI, he managed the projects also. He had complete supervision of the projects, as well as the leg- work. JON TTH STRETC REFORTERS WASHINGTON, 20024 (202) 7 8 9 12 13 15 17 18 20 == 23 24 23 The production, the material that was produced as a result of the project, was not his responsibility. That was MI. Minnel's. Mx, Goldsmith. Who was involved in setting the require- ments on policies with regard to the running of the project? Ms, Goodpasture. Mr. Goldsmith. Are you certain that the person respon sible for that was not yourself? Ms• Goodpasture. Pardon me? Mr. Goldsmith. Are you certan that you were not responsible for setting those requirements and policies? Ms. Goodpasture. Are you referring to asking people to asking for coverage over a specific investigation? Mr. Goldsmith. My question is directed towards whether you were involved in a supervisory capacity with setting the requirements and policies as to how the photosurveillance operation would be run. Ms. Goodpasture. I talked to him about it; but this 001177 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 37 --- ## Page 38 1-36 2 3 5 7 9 10 300 I TH STREET, S.W. REPONTERS RUINING. WASHTROTON. 12 13 15 1T 18 19 20 23 24 25 was his sole responsibility at the time. He was the case officer for the project. Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that, because of the sensi tivity of the photosurveillance operation. at the Soviet Embassy that Winn Scott felt that you were the person who should run this operation? Ms . Goodpasture. I do not think I heard that statement before. He did not want too many people involved in it because of the sensitivity and he asked me to review the photo- graphs to make sure that the outside people did not become sloppy in the photographic work. MI. Goldsmith. Nevertheless, did Winn Scott place you in a supervisory capacity with regard to this project? Ms. Goodpasture. No. I never saw anything in writing that referred to me as supervising the activities of that project. Mr. Goldsmith. If not in writing, nevertheless, informally did Winn Scott designate you as the person who would be super- vising that project? Ms. Goodpasture. He may have said informally, I want you to make sure that those operations are run properly, or something like that, but I do not think he did. I do not recall him doing that. Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that was the most junior officer in the station in 1963? 001178 ALCERSON REFORTINO COMPANY, INC. NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 38 --- ## Page 39 1-37 300 STREET, S: V1. REPORTERS BUILDING, casiltuiTON, D.C. 2 3 5 ó 7. 3 10 11 13 14 15 17 19 20 Ms. Goodpasture. That he was what? Mr. Goldsmith. The most junior officer. He had less seniority than anybody else in 1963. Ms. Goodpasture. Agewise, he probably was, Mr. Goldsmith. Is it also true that the Soviet opera- tion, in terms of surveillance of the Soviet Embassy, was an extremely sensitive operation? Ms. Goodpasture... It was not any more sensitive than the other operations which was handling. In fact, was probably the person most trusted by Winn scott. 23 21 23 Mr. Goldsmith, I do not believe that the answer is responsive to my question, though, Is it true that the Soviet Embassy surveillance opera tion was one of the most sensitive operations that was in effect in Mexico City in 1963? Ms • Goodpasture. I doubt it. MI. Goldsmith, Would you characterize that operation as extremely sensitive? Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? Mr. Goldsmith. Would you characterize that surveil- lance operation as extremely sensitive? ,MS: Goodpasture. It was - I would characterize it as sensitive to the extent that the Chief of Station did not want the photographs disseminated and the sourte identified, 0611g NH 50955 DocId: 32277221 Paye 39 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. ING. --- ## Page 40 1-38 2 3 551-2345 5 ó 7 20024 STREET, REPORTERS BUILDING, HASHENCION, 10 ! 12 13 17 18 19 20 21. 23 24 23 that reason it was considered sensitive. But every project that we had was also considered sensitive that involved a source who would be in jeopardy if they were identified. MI. Goldsmith. If were to say that his responsibility with regard to that project was simply to do the legwork on it and not to act in a supervisory capacity, would he be telling us the truth?. Ms. Goodpasture. When he first came there - Mr. Goldsmith. I believe that calls for a yes or no answer. Ms. Goodpasture. I am trying to figure out why someone would make a statement of that type. He felt, I am sure, as a young officer that he was only doing the legwork, but so was I. Because the person who made the decisions was the Chief of Station and his deputy, and they had the remainder of the people in the station do the legwork, the running around, meeting the agents; but when it came to make decisions they made the big decisions, but I did not make any decisions over work, if that is what you are getting at. MI. Goldsmith. With regards to this particular surveil- lance operation, did you make the decisions on it, or did make the decisions on it? Ms: Goodpasture. He made the decisions on it. As far as management of the project was concerned -- Mr • Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, what was the procedure 001180 ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 40 --- ## Page 41 1-39 3 30n PTH STREET, S.H. REPORTERS B011.01Ha. наЄНУлеТОМ, = 20024 (202) 551-2345 5 for getting the photographic film from the photography surveillance site to the station? Ms. Goodpasture. It was picked up at intervals by meetings with the person outside. Mr. Goldsmith. How long did it take? Ms. Goodpasture. There, again, my memory is faulty. I think that it was picked up once or twice or three times a week. Mr. Goldsmith. What was done with it once it was picked 10 !1 12 13 up? Ms, Goodpasture. Pardon me? Mr. Goldsmith, What was done with it once it was picked up? What was done with the photographic tape once it was picked up? 15 Ms. Goodpasture. What happened to it once it was picked up? 17 18 19. 20 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith. Right. Ms, Goodpasture. It was brought into the station and distributed to the people who took action on that product,: Mr, Goldsmith, Before it was distributed to the people In the station, was it developed? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes, it was developed. Mr. Goldsmith. It would he picked up, you think, approximately three times a week, It would be taken somewhere for processing and development and they would take it to the 001181 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 41 --- ## Page 42 1-40 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2345 7 3 10 2 13 14 30л 7T11 STREET, S.H. REPORTERS ANILDING, 15 17 18 17 20 23 24 23 station and distribute it. Is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. How long did this overall process • take? Ms. Goodpasture. My guess would be about a week from the time that the film was exposed, but some of the film might only be two days old or three days old. In the roll of film, it would. cover a period of one, two or three days, so that the last day's coverage on the film would be more recent than the first part of the film. Mr. Goldsmith. Would you give the panel your evaluation of the efficiency of the photosurveillance operation? Ms. Goodpasture. well, I think that it generally was very good as far as the coverage was concerned. If we asked them to get a photograph of the events that occurred between 9:00 and 10:00 on such and such a date, they usually produced the photographs for that period. Mr. Goldsmith. What if they were not specifically asked to focus on a person, as a matter of routine? How thorough was the coverage? Ms. Goodpasture. They covered the categories that we asked them for on a routine basis, which was to identify any people who appeared to be non-latin and any Soviets. MI. Goldsmith, I understand that was the purpose. Given that purpose, how thorough was the coverage? Ms. Goodpasture. 'I think it was accurate. 001182 ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC. WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 42 --- ## Page 43 1-41 2 3 5 7 3 10 300 2TH STRECT, .H. REPORTERS BUTIDING, 12 13 14 15 .15 17 18 19 20 23 2÷ 25 MI. Goldsmith. Was Winn Scott satisfied with the performance of the photo operation at the Soviet Embassy? Ms. Goodpasture. To the best of my knowledge he was. MI. Goldsmith, I would now like you to refer to page 20 of the document that you have before you in Stack A-3. Seven lines from the bottom in the middle of the page, it says "However." Ms. Goodpasture, Wait a minute. (Pause) Mr. Goldsmith. Seven lines from the bottom, starting with the word "However," I would like for you to read that. Ms• Goodpasture. The last, Mr. Goldsmith. "However, here again, there was." That is what I am referring to. Just read that section please. (Pause) Is the information contained in that section starting with "However" until the end of that page, accurate? Ms• Goodpasture. To the best of my knowledge it is, but I am not so sure whether or not the cameras used a separate ioll of film for each day after the assassination or before, I think it was after the assassination, That part right here is not clear. The reason I say it was after that period, because if you will look at the log of the film that occurred in October you will note more than one day on thatroll of film. 011183 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. AW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 43 --- ## Page 44 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2345 7 10 11 12 13 300 PTH STREET, $ 15 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 1-42 Mr. Goldsmith. After the photos were taken to the station, were they reviewed? Were the photographs reviewed? Ms. Goodpasture. After they came into the station? Mr. Goldsmith, Yes. Ms. Goodpasture' Yes. MI. Goldsmith. Who reviewed them? Ms. Goodpasture. I glanced at them and then I gave them to Herb Minell and he studied them, and if I was looking for something at the request of Mr. Scott, if he came down and asked me to go over the photographs for such and such a period, then I studied them more carefully. Mr. Goldsmith. Did you review, did you give all of the photographs from the photosurveillance operation of the Soviet Embassy to Mr. Minell? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. I routed them and then they went to the file where they were kept, but he had access to all of them. Mr. Goldsmith. If Mr. Minell were to have said that he received only those particular photographs from the Embassy! operation that you regarded to be of significance, would he be telling us the truth? Ms., Goodpasture. I think he would. I think he is referring - the photographs came in and there was a contact print on one sheet of paper, also, of those photographs, of those cases, where we asked them to look for people who had 001184 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 44 --- ## Page 45 I÷43 2 3 5 10 12 OTH STREET. S.l. REPORTERS NUTIDENG, 15 17. 18 19 20 ?? 23 24 25 car license plate or knew Soviets who had not been there before or people who were not Latins. They gave us a 3 x 5 photograph with them in addition to the sheet, and those 3 x 5 photographs were always given to MI. Minell to use of to identify the new Soviets or to start files to try to identify the others. But that was separate from the file copy, so that may have been what he was referring to. Mr. Goldsmith, He was given photographs of significance. Was he also given all of the photographs of the Embassy? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. He was shown all of the photo graphs that came. He retained, for his use, the 3 x 5 photo- graphs, but all the photographs were routed to him. Mr. Goldsmith, At this time, Mr. Chairman, I would like to break for any questions that the Committee might have. Mr. Preyer, I believe we would prefer to complete the testimony before asking questions. MI. Goldsmith. I would like to turn now to the photo- graphic surveillance operation of the Cuban Embassy and consulate. What responsibilities, if any, did you have with regard to that particular operation? Ms, Goodpasture. At the time, in 1963; none. MI. Goldsmith. When did you have responsibilities with regard to that operation? 001186 B"11". ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. NW 50955 Doold: 32277224 Page 45 --- ## Page 46 1-m 44 2 3 554-2345 5 ó 2002% $ 10 !! 12 REPORTERS MUTILING. •13 15 16 S.M. STREET 18 PTH 17 30n 20 23 24 23 Ms. Goodpasture. When they were first working on the Cuban Embassy, they asked me if I would help them with the photographs. I do not remember the exact time now. Mx. Goldsmith. How many cameras were in operation surveilling the Cuban Embassy and consulate? Ms. Goodpasture, I do not know. I am not sure. I tried to speculate on that, but I am just not sure. MI. Goldsmith, If you had to estimate, what answer would you give? Ms, Goodpasture. I thought that there were two, but I did not know if they were at the consulate entrance or the main gate, MI. Goldsmith. In September and October, 1963, at what times were the Cuban Embassy and consulate under photo-sur veillance? Ms, Goodpasture. What is that? Mr. Goldsmith. In September and October of 1963, at what times was the Cuban Embassy and consulate under photo- surveillance? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. I think the cameras were malfunctioning during thatperiod, but I am not sure right now the exact dates, but it should be in the record. MI. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine, during that period, what times would there have been coverage? Ms • Goodpasture. My guess would be that it would be the 001186 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. MH 50955 DooId: 32277221 Page 16 --- ## Page 47 1-45 2 3 same as the Soviets when the offices were opered, but it would be up to their case officer as to what times he ordered then to work, and the case officer, at that time, was Bob Shaw. 554-2345 S 9TH STREET, S.W. REPORTERS BUILDING. HASHINGTON, 10 11 12 13 17 19 20 21 23 24 23 ME. Goldsmith, In the case of the Cuban Embassy and consulate, what was the procedure for getting the photographic film from the surveillance site to the station? Ms. Goodpasture, I think that it was similar to that used for the Soviets, but I did not know the people who brought it in. I did not bring it in. Mr, Goldsmith, By whom were the photographs reviewed? Ms. Goodpasture. I think Bob Shaw, MI. Goldsmith. Did you review any of those photographs? Ms. Goodpasture. Not unless they brought one to me to. just look at it and compare with somebody who may have gone to the Soviet Embassy, which was the case of this controversial photograph. that we have. Mr. Goldsmith. Were you acting in an informal super- visory capacity with regard to the surveillance operation? Ms. Goldsmith, Mr. Shaw was in charge of thisoperation? Ms, Goodpasture. I think Bob Shaw was in charge of that operation. Mr, Goldsmith. How many years had. MI. Shaw been down at the Mexico City station? Ms: Goodpasture. I am not sure. It should be available 001187 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 47 --- ## Page 48 ]- 46 3 REFORTERS BULLDING. HACINGTON, n. C. 20029 ( 202) 554-2345 5 ó 7 10 12 13 }4 15 17 300 7TH 19 20 23 21 23 from headquarters. $63 to '65, I think... It is on page 18. Mr. Goldsmith. Now here-- according to page 18 of this document, Mr. Shaw was Chief of Cuban operations: Ms. Goodpasture. I think Dave Phillips, I believe. Mr. Goldsmith. You say that Mr. Phillips was the Chief during this period. According to your document on page 18, you also indicate that Mr. Shaw was the Chief of Cuban Operations. Ms, Goodpasture. Because MI. Phillips came down there, Dave Phillips was the covert action officer and then he was placed. In charge of Cuban operations, but Bob Shaw had actually been there before, handling the Cuban operations, and the other memorandum that you referred to was written when I was trying -- and I said it had several errors in it, but. I remember that Bob. Shaw was there working on Cuban. target. I did not know on what date when I wrote this when Dave Phillips was named as Chief, MI. Goldsmith. When Phillips came down, did be replace Bob Shaw as Chief of Cuban Operations? Ms: Goodpasture. No, he was there before in another capacity, then he was named to replace him. Mr. Goldsmith. Turning to page l9, according to page 19, under the section "Unilateral Photo, Cubans," it says that during this period, Robert Zambernardi was in charge of the 001188 ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 48 --- ## Page 49 1-47 2 3 2002% (202) 554-2345 8 9 WASHINGTON, 12 13 ITH STREET REPORTERS 15 is 17 19 20 23 24 25 unilateral photo operations. Ms. Goodpasture. These were two photographers, but they were not case officers. They processed the film. Mx. Goldsmith. I see. Ms. Goodpasture. They had no operational responsibility. MI. Goldsmith. Are you able to evaluate the efficiency of the Cuban photosurveillance operation? Ms. Goodpasture. My guess would be that it was just as efficient when it was operating as the Soviet one. MI. Goldsmith. With regard to both the photos that were obtained from the Cuban and the Soviet Embassy and consulates, what happened to them after they were taken back to the station and reviewed? Were they stored? Ms. Goodpasture, They were stored in the main file, chronological files. Mr. Goldsmith. During the period when MI. Scott was there, were any of these photographs disposed of? Ms. Goodpasture: Yes, Some of the earlier photographs, before we began to set up formal files in the late 1950's were not used. During the period that we are talking about to the best of my knowledge, in 1963, I do not believe any of the photo- graphs were destroyed as long as Mr. Scott was there. Mt. Goldsmith, How long were these photographs retained? Ms. Goodpasture, As far as I know, they were still there 001189 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 49 --- ## Page 50 1-48 3 2002% (202) 554-2345 •. I REPORTERS BUTLDING, DACITHOTON. 9 10 11 12 13 15 is 17 300 20 21 23 24 25 when I left in 1968. Mr. Goldsmith, Are they there now, to your knowledge? Ms. Goodpasture. Not all the photographs. A year ago I could not locate all of them. MI. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, we are now talking specifically about photographs taken in September and October of 1963. Now, you just said that, a year ago, you could not locate them. Did you go to Mexico City to attempt to locate them? Ms. Goodpasture. No. Mr. Goldsmith. Where did you go to to attempt to locate the photographs? Ms. Goodpasture. I was here in Washington and I looked through the files, but we did send a cable to Mexico City, In fact, we sent two cables to them trying to locate the photographs, Mr, Goldsmith. What was the response? Ms. Goodpasture. They could not locate one page of the photographs. Mr. Goldsmith. I do not understand the answer. They were unable to locate one page? Ms, Goodpasture. One page. One page of photographs they could not locate. Mx. Goldsmith. Does that mean that all of the other photographs they were able to locate? RA1AN3 ANDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 50 --- ## Page 51 1-49 3 5 REPORTERS NUILDING, paceron, 10 !! 12 13 15 300 PTI STREET, 17 18 19 20 21 Ms. Goodpasture. Does that mean what? All of the other photographs? Yes, We located all of the other files except for one. MI. Goldsmith. Do you remember what time period the page of photographs that you coudd not locate referred to? Ms. Goodpasture. Right offhand I do not remember, but I wrote a memorandum for it, which should be in this group of materials, a cover letter a year ago. MI. Goldsmith. Specifically with regard to the photo- graphs that were taken in September and October, 1963, did the information that you obtained from the Mexico City station last year indicate that all but one page of those photographs had been recovered and were available? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes, to the best of my knowledge, Mr. Goldsmith. When you say "a page of photographs," what are you referring to? Ms. Goodpasture. In a file which you showed me you have a copy, it is a contact print of 35 mm. film on one page, Mr. Goldsmith. I think I know what you are referring €0.. 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. By "a page," you mean a page that would contain one of more contact prints on it.: Ms, Goodpasture. It would contain contact prints from 001191 ALGERSON REPORTING COMFANY. INC. HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 51 --- ## Page 52 1-50 2 : 3 30n 7711 STREET, S.V. REPORTERS BURLOCKG. WASHINGTON, Đ.C. 20024 (2012) 554-2345 3 10 12 13 ?4 15 18 19 20 21 23 24 • 23 one roll of 35 imm. film. The film we had, but it was that contact print that was in the original files that we could not locate. Mr. Goldsmith. You still had the film? MS. Goodpasture. The negatives were avaihable. Mr. Goldsmith. In that case, what is available from the Mexico City station are all of the photographs, all of the photographic negatives or contact prints from the pictures that were taken at the Soviet and Cuöan Embassies and consul ates in september and October in 1963, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. Were these materials sent to head- quarters last year? Ms. Goodpasture. No, I do not think the material we could not locate was ever sent to headquarters. I think it was destroyed in the field. But the other film, all of the negatives concemed in this photograph had been sent to headquarters before I began to look for it last year. It came up in about 1968 or '69 when certain files were sent to headquarters, MI. Goldsmith. For purposes.of clarification, is it true that, available at headquarters or the Mexico City station are either the contact prints or the negatives of all of the pictures that were taken at the Cuban and Soviet Embassy and 001192 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. AW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 52 --- ## Page 53 1-51 3 5 300 1TH STREET. RETORTERS BULLDING. LASHIMCTON, D. 20024(202) 554-2345 10 12 13• 15 consulate? Ms, Goodpasture. YeS a Mr. Goldsmith.. Is it also true that available in regard to these materials are the photoproduction lines that are maintained? Ms • Goodpasture. With the one exception that I mentioned, the others are all available. Mr, Goldsmith. Are you saying that there was not a production log with regard to the contact prints? Ms• Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith, The others were all available from the Cuban and Soviet Embassy and consulates, is that right? Ms. Goodpasture, Correct. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to turn to the area of the electronic surveillance operation of the Cuban and Soviet Embassies and consulates. How many wiretap operations were in effect with respect to these embassies and consulates in September and October of 1963? 21 23 24 23 Ms, Goodpasture. Do you mean how many lines were covered, or how many projects did we have? When you say operations, you are referring to unilateral, not a lateral? Mr. Goldsmith, Let's first talk about the projects. How many projects were there? Ms. Goodpasture. We had one that we ran independently 001193 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 53 --- ## Page 54 1-52 2 3 ó 7 3 300 7'111 STREET. S.M. REPORTERS RUTLETHE, VAGUERGTON, D.C. 20024 io '! 12 13 15 i7 18 20 21 23 24 23 and one that was a liaison project. MI. Goldsmith. The one that was run independently was referred to as the unilateral project? Ms : Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. With regard to the one that was run independently, how many taps did you have in operation with regard to phones at the Soviet Embassy and consulate? Ms. Goodpasture. On the unilateral one? MI. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms, Goodpasture, I would have to guess without checking the files. Mr. Goldsmith. I am Just asking for an estimate. Ms. Goodpasture. I think -- I do not think that there was any coverage of the Soviets on the unilateral in September 1963. I think all of that was on the liaison. On the Cubans, I think there were one or two lines, Mr. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, again we are now talking about the period September-October, 1963. Turning to the liaison project, how many taps were in effect at the Soviet Embassy? Ms, Goodpasture, I believe there were five. MI, Goldsmith. Did you follow whose phones? Ms, Goodpasture. Do I recall m Mx.. Goldsmith, On whose phones, Ms, Goodpasture, Phones? 001194 ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 54 --- ## Page 55 1-53 2 3 MI. Goldsmith. Which phones were selected for wire- tapping purposes? Ms. Goodpasture. There was the Chancellory phone, the Cultural Office. I would have to check the transcripts to be sure. 7 i0 12 15 16 19 20 23 24 23 The military office was also covered. Mr. Goldsmith. By whom was the liaison project coordinated? I will try to speak up and speak more clearly. In any event, before I get to the question that I just asked you, how many phones were tapped at the Cuban Embassy and consulate? Ms, Goodpasture. The Cuban Embassy, four or five. Mr. Goldsmith. Do you recall which phones? • To the best of your memory, which phones were taped in the Cuban -- Ms, Goodpasture. Four or five. Mr. Goldsmith. Do you recall which ones? Ms• Goodpasture, Which ones? Not by menory, but I listed them all a year ago when I reviewed the transcripts, so there is a list of all the films that were covered at that time in the records. Mr, Goldsmith, Did the Mexicans have any unilateral coverage with regard to the Soviet and Cuban embassies? Ms. Goodpasture. The project was joint. They had the same coverage that we had MI. Goldsmith. To your knowledge, is it possible that 001195 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC (NN 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 55 --- ## Page 56 1-54. 3 ITH STREET. REPORTERS BULLDING, MASHENGTON, D.C. 20029 (202) 551-2345 5 10 12 3 1S 17 18 17 20 23 24 25 they, themselves, had a unilateral project? It is possible, but if they had coverage - which I am sure they probably did have - but they shared with us the coverage from the joint project: Mr. Goldsmith. What were your responsibilities with regard to the wiretapping operations? Ms. Goodpasture. Legwork and maangement. Mr, Goldsmith. By management, what do you mean? Ms. Goodpasture. I recorded all the correspondence, getting the money, paying the people who did the work, making sure that the machinery was functioning, picking up all of the transcripts and supervising most of the people involved with it, except for the Mexicans. MI. Goldsmith. In addition to electronic surveillance ofaa wiretapping nature, were there any "bugs" planted in the Cuban or Soviet Embassy and consulate? Ms, Goodpasture. I think there were, but I do not have firsthand knowledge of them. I think that the best person to give you the best information on that would be the Cuban case officers. We never put anything in the Soviet Embassy. MI. Goldsmith. If you did, would there have been a transcript made of the conversations that were overheard? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Would those transcripts still be on record at the agency today?: 001196 . ALCERSON PEFORTINE COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 56 --- ## Page 57 1-55 2 3 STREET, S.W. REPORTERS BUILDING, MASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 ₴ i0 12 15 17 19 19 20 27 23 24 23 Ms. Goodpasture. They should be. Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated earlier, I believe, that there was a list available of the Cuban phones that were covered by the electronic surveillance operation, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That thère was Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated earlier that you either saw or prepared a list of the phones that were covered by the surveillance project at the Cuban Embassy and consulate? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know where that list is today? Ms. Goodpasture. It should be in your records, MI. Goldsmith. Why do you say it should be? Ms. Goodpasture. I was told that you had a copy of all the transcripts and, with those transcripts, there was list of the lines that were covered, both Cuban and soviet. Mt. Goldsmith. In addition to the electronic surveil- lance both of a wiretap and of a bugging nature, did the Mexico City station have any penetration agents at the Cuban Embassy? Ms. Goodpasture. • I am not sure about the Cuban Embassy. MI Goldsmith. Did the Mexico City station have any penetration agents at the Soviet Embassy and consulate? Ms: Goodpasture.: No, MI. Goldsmith.: Are you certain about that answer? 001197 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY INC. HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 57 --- ## Page 58 1-56 3 300 ITH STKFFT, S.V. REPORTERS BULLDING. WASHINGTON, n. 10 71 12 13 17 18 20 21 23 24 23 Ms, Goodpasture. Pardon me? MI, Goldsmith. Are you certain that there were no CIA penetration agents? Ms, Goodpasture. To the best ofamy knowledge, there were none at the Soviet Embassy. If there were, I did not know about them. MI, Goldsmith. Your answer is the same for the Cuban. Embassy? Ms. Goodpasture. The Cuban Embassy, I do not know, because the Cuban Embassy had locals employed and there were assets in touch with some of those, locals by the case officer for the Cuban operations who would be the only person who would know about that. It is not in the records. Mr. Goldsmith, Fine. Turning to the scope of coverage, at what times were these lines under electronic surveillance. Ms, Goodpasture. I think that the equipment was activated when a telephone conversation took placelon the liaison lines, MI, Goldsmith. It would be autonatically activated? Ms, Goodpasture, yes Mr, Goldsmith. Therefore it would not be limited just to working hours? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes, or whenever a call occurrec. MI. Goldsmith. You indicated earlier when you attempted 001158 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. NW 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page 58 --- ## Page 59 1-57 2 3 REPORTERS BUTLDING, MASHINCTON. n. C. 2002% (202) 554-2305 7 10 12 13 300 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 23 to locate the photograhpic materials in Mexico City there was one contact page missing, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. There is a log missing and a page of contact prints -- Mr. Goldsmith, - is missing. Do you recall what period in September, October of '63 that page pertained to? (Pause) Are. you able to find what you are looking for? Ms. Goodpasture. There is a memo which I wrote on it. You should have a copy of it, and I am not sure what date it is. I thought it was in the papers that you showed me yesterday. Mr. Goldsmith. Let me see if I can help you. If you turn to the materials in Stack A, I think Stack A-2, is this what you are referring to? Because that is the only other document pertaining to this area that I showed you yesterday. Ms. Goodpasture. A-2. MI. Goldsmith. I am referring to Stack A-2. Is this the document that you referred to which would indicate which contact page was missing? Ms. Goodpasture. There is another one in which I mentioned that the folders had been reused, No, it is in this one 001199 ALOERSON REFORTINO COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 59 --- ## Page 60 1-58 3 ó 300 ITH STREET. S.N: REPORTERS BUTTING, 1261? NOTON, 10 12 13 15 17 17 20 23 24 25 MI. Goldsmith. please take the time to look through this document and see if you can find which contact print for what period is missing. Ms: Goodpasture. Right, (Pause). Mr. Goldsmith. If you are unable to find that at this time, perhaps we could pursue it later. It would be best to continue with the inquiry Ms. Goodpasture. Here it is, on page 4. Mr. Goldsmith. where specifically on page 4? Ms. Goodpasture. The files contained the photographs for the period. 2. May '67 to 30: of June '67 were in a folder that had been used, that was marked to hold files from the period 23 July '63 until 30 November "63. Mr. Goldsmith. Let us see if we can. I get this straight. First of all, even though the contact prints would not be available, the original negatives still would be. That Is correct, is it not? Ms, Goodpasture. The log for this one base, this one photographic source, was not available, Mr, Goldsmith. The original negatives would still be available? Ms, Goodpasture. The negatives are available and the original photographs are available because they were sent to Washington, But this file was destroyed, I suppose accidentally. 001200 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 60 --- ## Page 61 1-59 3 REPORTERS BUTEDING, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 7 10 3 300 ITU STREET, 17 19 19 2C Mr. Goldsmith. All that is missing is the log and the contact print? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right, which would have been in that file. Mr. Goldsmith. Are you saying, then, that the 1og that was kept of the photographs taken during this period, the entire 10g, from July 23rd '63 to November 30 '63 is no longer available? Ms. Goodpasture. Could not be locatédaa year ago. We were trying to locate it. Mr. Goldsmith. Did this pertain to the Cuban or Soviets? Ms, Goodpasture. Soviets. Now; another source that made photographs at the saie time, their logs are avalable for the same period. Mr. Goldsmith. I am not sure I am following. What are you getting at? Ms. Goodpasture. That there were three bases, there were two of those bases that photographed this unidentified man. 23 24 25 MI. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms, Goodpasture. Well, the logs are not available from one of those bases but from the other, it is, that you have. Mr. Goldsmith. When we say the production logs and the contact prints for this period are missing, that refers to only one of the three photo sites that were in operation 001201 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 61 --- ## Page 62 1-60 3 30л 7T11 STREET, S.W. REPORTERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON, 20024 (202) 554-2345 7 10 ! 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 23 21 25 at that time. Ms: Goodpasture.: That is right. The third photo site never photographed that man because he did not appear in the area. Mr. Goldsmith. We do not know whether they did or did not, since we do not have the production log. Ms. Goodpasture. We do not have the photographs from that third source again. MI. Goldsmith. Getting back to he wiretap operation how long did it take for the information that was obtained by the surveillance operation to reach you at the Mexico City station? Ms, Goodpasture. I generally picked it up early in the morning after the day on which conversation was made. Mr. Goldsmith. What would you pick up at that time? Ms ; Goodpasture. I picked up copies of the transcripts. Mr. Goldsmith, So, just take one day. To have the tape transcribed - Ms; Goodpasture. In most cases, because the transcribers with the Spanish texts worked at the same place where the recording machinery was. Mr. Goldsmith. When you say you picked it up, from whom did you pick up the transcripts? Ms. Goodpasture, From an outside agent,: MI. Goldsmith. Let us get into this procedure in a bit 001222 ALDERSON REPORTIO COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 62 --- ## Page 63 1-61 2 3 3 9 10 '! 12 13 REPORTERS 300 ITH STREET, 15 16 17 18 19 20 2! 23 24 25 more detail There would be a tape recording made, is that correct? Ms • Goodpasture. A what? Mr. Goldsmith. A tape recording of the conversation would be made, is that correct? Ms • Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. How would that tape recording actually get to the transcribers, or translaters? Ms. Goodpasture. The transcribers, or the transcrip- tions that I picked up, the transcribers were working at the same place with the Spanish text. If the language were other than Spanish, it would have to be taken to another location. to be transcribed. The material that was picked up the day after the date on which it occurred was in the Spanish language, normally. Mr. Goldsmith. If the conversation was in Russian, would it be taken to Mr. Boris Tarasoff for translation? Ms: Goodpasture, That is right. Mr. Goldsmith, Routinely, how long did it take Mr. Tarasoff to make the translation? Ms. Goodpasture. It depended on his backlog, but generally it was a delay of a day or two. Me. Goldsmith. In cases of Russian translations, would It be fair to say that generally you would receive a transcript within three or four days?of the time that the conversations 091*== ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 63 --- ## Page 64 1-62 2 3 5 551-2345 300 7TH STREET, S.V. REFORTERS BUILDING. 9 10 12 13 14 15 1á 17 were made? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes, MI. Goldsmith. Do you know who took the tapes to Mr. Tarasoff for transcription? Ms • Goodpasture. Yes, the same man who brought them to me, the outside agent of the liaison project. Mx. Goldsmith. Who was that individual. Ms, Goodpasture. His name was Flick. Mr. Goldsmith. Was there anybody else besides MI. Flick that was responsible? Ms., Goodpasture, Herbert Minell. Mr. Goldsmith. I believe I asked you yesterday to describe Mr. Flick and you described him as looking like me. Are you able to. give a more definite description today of MI. Flick? Ms, Goodpasture. Well, he. looks like an All-American boy- 20 23 24 23 ME, Goldsmith. Thank you. This Mr. Flick was approximately 5 feet six inches tall? Ms. Goodpasture. He seemed taller than that to me. MI. Goldsmith. How old was he in 1263? Ms, Goodpasture. He must have been about 45 and if I missed it by a few years, he probably would not like it. Mr. Goldsmith. Once the transcripts were brought.to you, would you review all of then? 001204 ALCERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC. HN 50955 DocId: 32277224 : Page 64 --- ## Page 65 1- 63 20024 (202) 2 3 5 7 3 10 300 ITH STREET, REPORTERS nurturi. WASHINGTON, 12 13 15 1ó 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture.: Not always because they were routed to the people who took the action on them, and in the case of some of those transcripts, there was a stack about an inch or so thick, and if you took the time to read them, then the people who had to take the action on them did not get to see them, so I generally took them and passed them out. Mr. Goldsmith. Would you review most of them? Ms. Goodpasture. I had more than one copy so I could look at them, if there was something of significance. Mr. Goldsmith. I am not sure that I am following you. As a matter of routine you would review it, or would you pass it along? Ms. Goodpasture. I would pass it along, first. I kept one copy myself for files and I had access to that copy. Mr. Goldsmith. In the case of transcripts from the Soviet compound, they woüld go to Mr. Minell, is that correct? Ms, Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. From the Cuban compound, it would go to whom? Ms. Goodpasture. It went to Bob Shaw. MI. Goldsmith. Or Dave Phillips? Ms. Goodpasture. Or Dave Phillips. Mr. Goldsmith. How long were the tapes maintained? Ms. Goodpasture. About two weeks. Mr. Goldsmith. What happened to the tapes after the two- 001205 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 65 --- ## Page 66 1-64 2 3 7 3 week period? Ms. Goodpasture. They were erased and reused. Mr. Goldsmith. They would be erased for the purpose of reuising, did you say? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes: Mr. Preyer. "Let me interrupt counsel. That is our second bell, We have to go to the Floor to answer the quorum call. Miss Goodpasture has been at it quite awhile now, so I suggest that we take about a ten-minute recess at this time. 10 11 1 2 13 15 300 17 18 19 20 73 24 25 We will recess for about ten minutes, (A brief recess was taken,) Mx. Preyer. The Committee will resume when counsel is ready to resume his questions. MI, Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, getting back to the area of the wiretap operations of the Cuban and Soviet embassies, would you indicate to the Committee in what manner the photosurveillance and the wiretap operations were tied into each other? Ms. Goodpasture. On a wiretap operation, if we got information that someone was going to one of those places far in adyance, we would notify the people taking the photographs to try to get pictures of them. That was one way we were tied in, Another way we were tied in was if we saw where a person had been there at such 001206 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HY 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 66 --- ## Page 67 1-65 2 3 300 7111 STREET, REPORTIES BUILDING. MACHINGTON, п. с. 20024 (202) 554-2345 3 10 11 12 13 15 13 18 17 20 ?1 and such a time, we would check back to see if there was a photograph made during that period and if there was any way that that person could be identified. Mr. Goldsmith. Similarly, if there was a tape-recording made of a conversation and from the conversation it became apparent that the person at issue was either at one of the embassies or was going to go to one of the embassies, it would be possible, would it not, to go to the photo-production logs and determine who that person was? Ms. Goodpasture. We could determine if there was a photograph there and if the photograph appeared to be the same person that came upon the wiretap. Now, there might be someone speaking English and the only photograph that we had was someone that was obviously a Latin whom we knew who did not speak English. We could rule him out! as being the person who made the call. Mr. Goldsmith. In what manner would this procedure take place if you knew that someone was either going to the Embassy or that he was there at a particular time? How would you go about checking to see if you had a photograph of that person? Ms. Goodpasture. If we knew afterwards that he had been there? 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith. yeS. Ms. Goodpasture. We would take the coverage for that day, look at it, and see if he was there. 0N1207 ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 67 --- ## Page 68 1-66 ? 3 2002% (202) 554-2345 7 300 77H STREET, S.W. REPORTERS nuttninG, CASIOUSTON, 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 * 1 23 24 25 Mr. Goldsmith. You would not confine yourself just to a specific time that day? You would examine the entire day's coverage? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. The log was prepared in such way that they listed the time and the description of the person who went there. Mr. Goldsmith. I believe earlier you testified as a matter of routine, the photo-surveillance operations would take pictures of foreigners - in other words, a non-Mexican and of Soviet or Cuban personnel, is that true? Ms. Goodpasture. Soviet, yes. Well, I do not know about the Cubans, but I can say that for sure for the Soviets. Mr. Goldsmith. They would take the photograph of some- one who did not fit that category if they were given notice in advance that someone happened to be of interest, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. (Pause) Mr. Preyer. We have another vote on the House Floor. I suggest that we take another moment while I go over and vote. We will recess for about five minutes. (A brief recess was taken.) MI. Preyer. The Committee will resume. You may resume questioning. Mr. Goldsmith. Thank you. 001208 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 68 ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 69 1 - 67 2 3 20024 (202) 7 3 ITH STREET. 47 REPORTERS BUILDING, PENNGTON, 12 13 14 15 15 17 18 19 20 21 13 24 25 Miss Goodpasture, who would give notice to the photo surveillance units to take a picture of a particular individual. Ms. Goodpasture. Would you repeat that, please? Mr. Goldsmith. Certainly• Let us assume that it is decided that a particular individual is important and should be photographed. Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith, Who would give notice to the photo- surveillance units of.that fact? "Ms. Goodpasture. The case officer handling the project. That would have been Mr. Goldsmith. Assuming, for example, that one of the people monitoring the wiretap operation picked up a conversa- tion that the person regarded to be significant and in that conversation it became apparent that something was of interest Would it be standard procedure for that person to call directly to the photo-surveillance sites? Ms. Goodpasture. No, because that person did not know any of the people onducting the photo-surveillance. Now I think in the case of the unilateral operation which was also handled unilaterally, wiretap operation, it was also handled by I am not sure if they would contact the photo people of not, but my people could not contact the photo people. They would have to come in to me and I would write a note, give it to Tom, and Tom went out and notified 001209 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. ING AH 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page 69 --- ## Page 70 1-68 2 3 AULINING. MACINCTON, D 20024 554-2345 5 ó 7 10 ! 2 3 15 17 300 20 73 24 25 the photo people. Mr. Goldsmith. How long would it take for notice to be given? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, the length of time that it would take to call somebody and locate them and talk to them, normally we did not give them that information on the telephone. It could be one day, two days, or three days. Mr. Goldsmith. Would it be possible for the individual monitoring the telephone conversation to call his case officer directly, or to call you directly? Ms. Goodpasture. No. Mr. Goldsmith. To call the case officer directly and then for the case officer to immediately contact the photo- surveillance operations and tell them to take a picture of a particular individual? Ms. Goodpasture. In the case of s operation, it would, but in the case of the ones I handled, it would not, They had to go through the person whom I met outside, then he got in touch with me and I gave the notice to Tom and Tom took it to his people. MI. Goldsmith. You are drawing a distinction now between the operations handled and those which you handled. What is the distinction you are making? Which operations did he handle? Ms. Goodpasture. He handled the unilateral telephone 001210 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 70 --- ## Page 71 1-69 2 3 30n TE STREET. S.W. REPONTERS BUTLDING. DASHINGTON. o.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 10 2 15 lá 17 18 19 20 23 24 23. operations. MI. Goldsmith. You handled? Ms. Goodpasture. The liaison and the agents in the unilateral operation and the agents in the liaison operation did not know each other, to the best of our knowledge, were not aware of each other's operations. Mr. Goldsmith. We may have covered this before, however I would like to clarify this point in terms of the photo production logs from the surveillance operations from the Cuban Embassy and consulate and Soviet Embassy and consulate. Those materials were all available the last time you knew with the exception of that particular contact page, and the photoproduction page pertaining to that contact page, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. You mean available now? MI. Goldsmith. Right. Ms, Goodpasture. They are available, yes. That is correct. Mr. Goldsmith. On the transcripts that were made of the telephone conversations, would the transcript have an indication of the telephone line that was being tapped? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. And the location of the telephone? In other words, the soviet Embassy, Cuban Embassy? Ms. Goodpasture. There would be a cryptonym which would 001211 NH 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 71 ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 72 1-70 2 JON ATI STREET. S.V. REPORTERS BULLDING, LASHTICTON, n. C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 9 !! 12 13 14 is 17 19 20 identify it. Mr. Goldsmith. It would also give the time of the telephone call, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to get into the area of the relationship between the Agency's surveillance opera- tions and Lee Harvey Oswald. In that regard, I would like to draw your attention to Stack B. I believe it is going to be handed to you right. now, Miss Goodpasture. (Pause) I would like you to refer to page 1 in Stack B. Ms. Goodpasture. Yes: Mr. Goldsmith. Can you identify this document? Ms. Goodpasture, This looks like a copy of the trans- cript, a xerox copy of the transcript. Mr. Goldsmith. Would you please read the content of this first page, the person that is marked off starting by line 151 or starting with the line designated in the left 151. 23 24 Ms. Goodpasture. Are you referring to the last lines? Mr. Goldsmith. No. I am refering to the middle of the page, in the lefthand column, where it says number 151. Ms. Goodpasture. 151. That is the space on the tape where this conversation took place. . If that tape were put on 001212 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 72 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 73 1-71 1 3 7 3 PEPORTERS RULIDING, MASHINCION, 11 12 13 14 15 i7 300 ITH STREET. 19 20 21 23 24 23 the same machine that it was recorded on and started at 0, this would come up on 151. It would not apply on any other machine of starting at any other number. Mr. Goldsmith. Would you read the conversation that follows immediately next to 151. (Pause) What does the designation "MO" signify? Ms. Goodpasture. Man outside. Mr. Goldsmith. Does that mean a man outside making a phonecall inside? Ms. Goodpasture. That means that this telephone call, that it was a man from outside of where the telephone was who called in. Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. Is it possible to tell from page 1, at approximately what time this call came in? I will direct your attention to the top of the page, of page I. Ms. Goodpasture: I know. I am looking for - it was sometime after 9:55. Mr. Goldsmith. The upper righthand portion of this page indicates that the call came in on October 1, 1963, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. At the bottom of the page there is some writing in script, cursive. I draw your attention to that at 001212 play 50955 DocTa: 32377224 Page 73 ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 74 1-72 2 300 2111 STREET, S.H. REPORTERS BUILDING MASHU NOTON, 20024(202) 554-2345 7 this point. Ms. Goodpasture. It is a number for the Russian Embassy. Mr. Goldsmith. Which would be the number for the Russian Embassy, 15-16-55? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. What do the other numbers signify? Ms. Goodpasture.: The other numbers refer to numbers that were used on the machine doing the recording. Mr. Goldsmith. The number 0921-1320. What does that Ms. Goodpasture. The hours that were covered on that 10 !! 12 13 reel. MI. Goldsmith. Miss Goodpasture, when did the informa- tion contained in this transcriptifirst come to your atten- tion? •15 1á 17 1 20 21 23 24 Ms. Goodpasture.. Probably the day after it was recorded. Mr. Goldsmith. Was that the first time that Lee Harvey Oswald came to your attention? Ms • Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. What action, if any, did you take upon receiving this information? Ms. Goodpasture. What action? MI. Goldsmith. Right. How did you respond to receiving this ifnormation? Ms. Goodpasture, Well, the tape, the reel, was taken to the Russian transcribei. Now I am not sure whether that 001214 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 74 --- ## Page 75 1-73 3 J00 PTI STREET, s.V. REPORTERS BULLDING, HASHTUSTON, n.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 ó 3 12 13 14 1j man who brought me the conversation took the reel to the transcriber, or whether Herb Minell did, but normally, one or the other would carry the reel out to the Russian trans- criber. Mr. Goldsmith. So, when you say that this information first came to your attention a day or two after the conversa- tion was made -- Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. Are you saying that you received the conversation in its original form in Russian? Ms. Goodpasture.: No, I received a transcript. Mr. Goldsmith. Did the transcript - Ms. Goodpasture. Which said there was a call made. was ; a Spanish transcript and in Spanish, it said there was a call being made by a man who was trying to speak. Russian and gave the name Oswald, I believe. I do not happen to have a copy, but you should have a copy of it. Mr. Goldsmith. This transcript was taken to Mr. Tara- 17 18 17 20 21 soff? 23 24 23 Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. When was the first time you actually saw the Russian translation of the conversation? Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? MI. Goldsmith. When was the first time that you actually saw the conversation after it had been translated from Russian 001215 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 75 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 76 1-74 3 3O0 PTI STREET S.W. REPORTERS BULLDING, MASHLUCTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 7 10 !! 12 13 15 17 18 20 23 24 23 into English? Ms. Goodpasture. Probably when I got a file copy back from Herb Minnel, within a few days after this, but I do not know the exact date right off. Mr. Goldsmith. What was your response at that point, if any? Ms. Goodpasture. A cable was sent to Headquarters by Mrs: Minell. Mr. Goldsmith. Did you direct Mrs. Minell to send a cable to headguarters? Ms: Goodpasture. No, I did not, because Mr. Minell was my superior. He would have been directed by the Chief -- I say he was my superior. He outranked me in grade. Mr. Goldsmith. Who sent the cable, Mr. or Mrs. Minell? Ms. Goodpasture. His wife, but he had his own section and he had a separate section from the one I was in. We did not direct each other. We might have suggested it, but he took his orders from the Chief of Station. MI. Goldsmith. Did you suggest to Mrs. Minell- Ms. Goodpasture. I do not remember whether I did or not. "I may have Mr. Goldsmith. Did you, or anyone else, check the transcripts that were obtained from the Soviet Embassy • from September 28th? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think I checked them at that 001216 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 76 ALOEASON REFORTING COMPANY. ING. --- ## Page 77 1-75 time. 2 3 REFCRIFAS BUTLDING, WASHINGTON, D.C. 2002% (202) 554-2345 ó 7 8 10 12 13 300 7TI STREET, 15 15 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 23 MI. Goldsmith. The significance of the question is as follows. Drawing your attention to the third line after the number 151, it says: "Hello. This is Lee Oswald speaking. I was at your place last Saturday." well, October 1, 1963 was a Tuesday, the 28th was a Saturday. I am wondering whether anyone went back to check onthe transcripts of telephone conversations. on that day of the photo-production materials for that day? Ms. Goodpasture. Theonly indication of the name was from the telephone transcripts. MI. Goldsmith. Yes: Ms. Goodpasture. On that day. That was when we first found out that he was there. Mr. Goldsmith. On October Ist, you found out that Oswald had been at the Russian Embassy the preceding Saturday. Was any effort made to check your materials from the surveil lance operation, the photographic surveillance operation, or from the telephonic surveillance operation to get additional information: on this? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know whether I checked it immediately or not at this stage. I do know that they were checked thoroughly after the assassination, In fact, I think they were checked thoroughly after the information came back from Washington identifying a Lee Oswald. The files were 091217 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 77 --- ## Page 78 1-76 3 300 11H STREET. S.W. REPORTERS BUILDING, VASMINCION, D.C. 2002% (202) 554-2345 7 10 12 15 17 18 19 20 checked at that time to find out if we had any record of a person named Lee or a person named Oswald. Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. Let's stay to this time period for a moment, however. Would it have not been standard operating procedure if the transcript refers to a person who appeared at the Embassy a few days earlier, would it not have been standard operating procedure for either you or someone else in the Mexico City station. to check your records. from that earlier day, September 28th, to see if, in fact, you had a photograph of this person or another tape recording of his voice? Ms. Goodpasture. I think that it would have been stan- dard practice to have done a file check on him. MI. Goldsmith. Is the answer to my question yes? Ms. Goodpasture. To check the record files to see if we have a record of that name previously, but to check back on the transcripts, I did not process the transcripts from the Soviet Embassy as such. Whether MI. Minell or MrS. Minell went back and reviewed those again at that time, I do not knoW • 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith. The text of this conversation includes, in brackets, what apparently is an insertion by the transla- tor. He says the same person who phoned a day or so ago and spoke in broken Russian: In light of that statement by the translator, in light 001218 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 78 --- ## Page 79 1-77 3 5 7 JON ITH STREET 5.W. REPORTERS BULLDING, WASHINGTON. D. C. 20024 10 12 13 15 17 19 .20 21 23 24 of that statement by the person who identifies himself as Oswald that he, Oswald, had been there Saturday and the trans lator was saying that this person had phoned a day or so ago, would it not have been standard operating procedure to have checked? Ms, Goodpasture, Yes, I think it would have. Mr. Goldsmith. The photo materials and the wiretap materials? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Also, it would have been done autonatically in the base by the Mexicans. Mr. Goldsmith.' Fine. At that time, was any photograph found of lee Harvey Oswald? Ms. Goodpasture. The only photograph that was located ten Meren no, not of oswald.. We had no photograph of him. MI. Goldsmith. At that time, were you able to locate the earlier tape recording containing a conversation involving this same individual? Ms, Goodpasture. I did not, but I do not know if the Minell's put those taperecordings or not at that time. I assume that they probably did. I know that they were put together in November. Mr. Goldsmith. I would now like you to refer to pages 2 and 3 in Stack. B, and I ask you if you can identify what these materials are. 001219 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 79 ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY INC. --- ## Page 80 1-78 2 3 5 30n TTI STREET. S.W. REPORTERS BUrNING, NASHYNCTON, D. C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 3 10 12 •13 14 13 17 13 20 71 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. Page • 2? MI. Goldsmith. Page 2 and 3 of the materials contained in Stack B, 2 and 3, the next two pages. Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Can you identify these materials? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. They also appear to be copies of portions of the transcripts. Mr. Goldsmith. On what date was this conversation transcribed? I withdraw that question. Let me rephrase it, please. On what date, according to this document, did this conversation take place? Ms • Goodpasture. 28 September 1963. Mr. Goldsmith. What was the telephone that was the source of this conversation? Ms. Goodpasture, The Soviet Embassy. The conversation was recorded on the Soviet Embassy telephone, It came in from a woman from the consulate, the Cuban consulate. MI. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to the number 208 in the middle of the page, on the line adjacent to that. number, it says, please see that the Spanish transcription, it says "wo." Does that stand for woman outside? Ms. Goodpasture. That was written by Tarasoff. MI. Goldsmith. Right. That would indicate woman out- side? Telephone call from a woman outside? 001220 HH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 80 ALDERSON PEPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 81 3 REPORTERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 3 10 !1 13 14 15 300 PTH STREET, 17 18 19 20 23 21 15 1-79 Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. When he prepared the transcripts, he prepared them on a separate sheet of paper and he put them in there so that the person would tie it in with the Spanish transcript, and what they have done here is they cut off the top of the page, the transcript that Tarasoff did, and pasted it to the Spanish transcripts. Mr. Goldsmith. Have you seen this particular document, or a copy of it, before? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, my name is on it. Mr. Goldsmith. Your name appears in the upper right- hand portion? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes MI. Goldsmith. When was the first time that you saw either this particular document, or a copy of it? Ms. Goodpasture. Within a couplerof days after it was transcribed. Mr. Goldsmith. What action, if any, did you take in response to seeing this particular document? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think I took any. I think Minell was the one who would have taken the action on this! MI. Goldsmith. At the time that you received the transcript. containing the conversation of October Ist, do you recall this earlier transcription of the conversation? Ms, Goodpasture. No, I do not think I did, because I did not read all of these transcripts. When I brought them 001221 NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page B1 ALOEASON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 82 1-80 3 MACHINGTON. D.C. 20029 (202) 554-2345 5 7 3 10 13 14 15 30п ITH STREET en REFORFERS 17 18 19 20 21 23 2= 25 in, I passed them out, and the one on the 28th of September would have gone automatically to Mr. Minell. The one on I October, unless it was very unusual or my attention woüld have béen called to it, I would not have been doing an analysis of them. Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether the Minells. linked the two conversations together? Ms. Goodpasture, I do not know. Mr. Goldsmith. Did you or the Minell's check the photo production materials after seeing this particular conversation? Ms. Goodpasture. After seeing the name Lee Oswald, I think that the photo production materials for that day had not been received, as. I recall, and a note was given to tO go out and pick up the film for this period and bring it in. The transcripts were usually received before the photographs were. MI. Goldsmith. At such timethat thephotographs were received, did you or anyone else go to check. the photoproduc- tion materials to see if you could identify the individual? Ms• Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Do you recall when that happened? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. As I remember, we were waiting for that material to come in, and when it came in, we looked at it together and decided that there was one man who was not 001222 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 82 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY INC. --- ## Page 83 1-81 2 3 RIGHTERS BUILDING, MACHINGTON. n. C. 2002% (202) 551-2345 $ 10 !! !3 14 15 300 ITH STREET, 17 18 19 20 23 24 23 a Latin. MI. Goldsmith. This conversation came in at approxi- mately 11:51 a.I., is that correct, on September 28th? Ms Goodpasture. This conversation was recorded at 1151 hours on the 28th. The 28th was on a Saturday. We would have gotten it probably on Monday, following the 28th. Then it would have gone out to Mr. Tarasoff who would have made a trnaslation from the Russian. Mr. Goldsmith. You said that you waited to receive the photographs and, upon receiving the photographs of production, you checked these materials, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. MI. Goldsmith. Upon checking the photograph of produc- tion from September 28th, did you find a photograph of Lee Harvey Oswald? Ms. Goodpasture. No. Mr. Goldsmith. Did you find a photograph of some other North American appearing male? Ms • Goodpasture. We found a photograph of a non-latin, a man who appeared to be a non-Latin, MI. Goldsmith. That photograph was taken on September 28, 1963. In other words, these are the production materials you were checking? Ms. Goodpasture. There were three sets, He appeared on the 28th, I believe, and on the indond. I am not sure. it 001222 NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 83 ALCERSON RESORTINO COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 84 1-82 2 3 REPORTERS BUILDTNG. MASHENGTON, D.C. 20024 ( 202). 554-2345 10 12 13 ITH STREET 15 15 17 18 17 20 13 24 25 is in the logs, the date that the man appeared there. Mr. Goldsmith. Now, Saturday, September 28th, drawing your attention to that day, would that have been a day when the Embassy, either the Cuban Embassy or Russian Embassy, would have been open? Ms. Goodpasture. Not to the public, I do not think, but somebody could have gone there and rung the doorbell and may have been received by the guard on duty. Mr. Goldsmith. Saturday was not really a working day, is that correct? Ms • Goodpasture. No. Mr. Goldsmith. I am a bit confused, now. Earlier in your téstimony I recall your indicating that the photo-surveil lance operation was coordinated with the working hours of the embassies: Here we have a situation where the embassies were not working. Ms, Goodpasture.. I think the photograph was the 27th, not the 28th. I made a mistake: Mr. Goldsmith. If I may finish, here we have a situation where the photograph was taken on the 28th. This was a Saturday. If the photograph were taken on the 28th then, in fact, the photo-surveillance operation was in effect on a Saturday, which was a non-working day for the Cuban and Soviet embassies, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. If the photograph was made on the 28th, 001224 ALIERSON REPORTING COMPANY. ING. HN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 84 --- ## Page 85 1-83 2 3 3O0 PTH STREET, S.l. REFORTERS BUrtDING. MASHINCTON, D.C. 2002% 02 554-2. 3*5 7 10 12 15 18 19 .20 23 24 it was not a working day, a Saturday. But the photo base houses were places where people lived and if they saw some- thing that they thought was unusual, they could make a pic- ture anytime they wanted to and send it in. But they were normally required to be on duty during the times when the Embassy had working hours. Does that explain it? Mx. Goldsmith. That may explain it in part. I think we should pursue this just a bit. The photograph that you found of a person going to one of these embassies was taken on September 28th, is that correct? Ms, Goodpasture. I would have to look at them to see. Right now I am a little confused about that nyself, because this man appeared there several times, but we have copies of those and the dates on them. I do not know if they are here of not, but I went through the files that we had to put those dates on. Mt. Goldsnith. I am afraid that none of the materials that yourand. I reviewed yesterday pertained to September 28th or even September 27th, so I am unable to show you any produc- tion materials for those two days. Ms. Goodpasture. It was not the 28th. They are not here. I guess it was on the 2nd of October that he appeared the first time. 001225 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 85 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. ING. --- ## Page 86 1-84 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 10 5.11. REPORTERS BUILDING. 12 13 15 17 18 17 20 31 23 24 25 Mr. Goldsmith. You are saying now that you are not sure whether you found the photograph of September 28th? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not have them here, but I did get all the photographs of that man, together with the dates on them, which I think you have. When I was looking here on this 28th transcript, I said 28th and what I was "thinking was that when we checked the photographs for the days around the time of the call, we found the photograph, but I do not know what day it was now, right off the top of my head. Mr. Goldsmith. Did you find a photograph of just one person who appeared to be North American in appearance? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. How many days' photographic surveillance coverage did you review? Ms. Goodpasture. How many days? Mr. Goldsmith, Right. Ms. Goodpasture. They were the same days that were mentioned in the transcripts. MI. Goldsmith. Four or five days? Would that be a fair estimate? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. I notice Mr. Shaw's name on this, on the top of the page, page 2, Why would his name be up there? Ms, Goodpasture. His name would be on here because the telephone call came from a woman from the Cuban Embassy, but NN1226 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 86 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 87 1-85 2 3 ó JON ITI STREET, S.V. REFORTERS BULLDING, LASHTICION. 10 !! 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 21 25 he was responsible for the Cuban Embassy coverage. The first line of that says woman from the consulate, Cuban Embassy. MI. Goldsmith. Why did this particular document go to Shaw rather than to Dave Phillips? Ms. Goodpasture. Because Shaw had handled most of the routine work and I think he was the one who read all of the transcripts. But to be perfectly exact about it, I am not too sure. I suppose Dave Phillips did not have time to read the transcripts and Shaw was the one who reviewed them Mr. Goldsmith. Is it possible in fact that the photo- graph. that you found was thephotograph that was taken on September 28th, 1963? Ms, Goodpasture. To answer your question we would have to check the log because the log has the date of the photo- graphs and a copy of the photograph attached to it. Mr. Goldsmith. In any event, with regard to the conver- sation of October Ist and the conversation of October 28th; these came to your attention right around that time period as opposed to some time after the assassination, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. The conversations that had the name in it, Lee Oswald, came to my attention right after the conversation occurred. MI. Goldsmith, The conversation of the 28th, when did that first come to your attention? 001227 WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 87 ALDERSON REFORTINE COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 88 1- 86 2 3 REPONCERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON, n. C. 20024 ( 202) 8 10 ?! 12 13 15 17 300 ITH STREET, Ms. Goodpasture. I do not recall seeing it until after the assassination.: MI. Goldsmith. However, was your testimony earlier to the effect: that upon receiving the conversation reflected on page 2, the September 28th, 1963 conversation, and after it was made, to locate a picture of the person who was going to the Russian Embassy, you did indicate that, did you not? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, this conversation may have been tied into the Oswald conversation by the Russian trans- criber because he did both of them about the same time. There was only one day's difference. It is logical to assume that he would have recognized the voice, and we probably had both transcripts at the same time looking for a man when we were examining the photographs. Mr, Goldsmith. This, in all likelihood, would have been brought to your attention, Ms• Goodpasture. When? Mr. Goldsmith, Shortly after September 28th? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. If it was with the lee Oswald 19 20 21 one.. 23 24 MI. Goldsmith, Do you recall personally screening the photo production materials to try to locate a photograph of Oswald, or the person who identified himself as Oswald? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. I think almost everyone in the station looked at those photographs after the assassination, 001228 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HM 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 88 --- ## Page 89 1-87 2 JON PIN STREET S.V. REPORTERS BULL.DING., MACINGTON, n. C. 20024 (202) 551-2315 10 12 13. 15 1é 18 19 20 23 24 25 but MI. Minell and I looked at them after, his wife and I examined them after the Oswald name first appeared. Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, this conversation did come to your attention well before the assassination? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Was there anything, in your opinion, unusual about Oswald's being at the Cuban Embassy on a Saturday? Ms: Goodpasture. I do not think that the Cuban Embassy connection was tied in until afterwards, I do not know® There were two calls on the 27th to the Cuban Embassy. MI. Goldsmith, I will rephrases the question. It is apparently that, on September 28, 1963, Oswald, according to this conversation, was at the Cuban Embassy. That is where the conversation was made from, so at that day he was at the Cuban Embassy. You indicated that that would not have been a working day for the Cuban Embassy, is that correct? Ms, Goodpasture. The photo-surveillance, you mean? Mr. Goldsmith, Saturday would not have been a working day for the Cuban Embassy. Ms, Goodpasture. That/is right. MI. Goldsmith. Was there anything unusual about Oswald's being at the Cuban Embassy on a day that was not a working day? Ms. Goodpasture. No, because foreigners were going to. 001229 NW 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page 89 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 90 1-88 2 3 7 3 300 7111 STREET, 5.1. REPORTERS BUTIRiNG, DASHINGTON; 10 11 i2 13 F. 15 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 both places and ringing the door bell and the gate-keeper frequently let them in on days other than working days. Mr. Goldsmith. If it is true that foreigners were frequently visiting the embassies on days other than working days, then why was the photo-surveillance operation confined to working days? Ms. Goodpasture. Because the people could not work around the clock. They had to have some time off. One of the photographers, as I recall, was apart-time student, or something, but it was not possible to have that thing going all the time. I think later maybe it set up a mechanical type surveil- lance that ran continuously. Mr. Goldsmith. However, there were three different camera sites? Ms. Goodpasture. They did not all hit the same place. MI. Goldsmith. Is it not possible, despite staffing problems; that on Saturday and Sunday at least one of the photo sites could have been maintained? Ms. Goodpasture. It could have been possible if we had been working, if our photographers had been American citizens and staff agents, but we were working with Mexicans and not many of them worked on sundays, normally. That was their day off. MI. Goldsmith, How about Saturdays? 001230 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY INC. NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 90 --- ## Page 91 1-89 2 3 20024 10 300 7711 STREET S.W. REPORTENS B011016, 12 13 17 18 19 20 23 24 23 Ms: Goodpasture. I do not know. You would have to talk to the case officer because it was determined that it just was not feasible to use them on Saturdays and Sundays. Mr. Goldsmith. Even though there were three different surveillance sites? Ms. Goodpasture. There were three different photo surveillances, but they all did not cover the same spot. Mr. Goldsmith. Even though there were three different surveillance operations of each Embassy on non-working days, all three were shut down, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right, to the best of my knowledge. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to refer you to pages 4 through 6 of the documents contained in Stack B. Most of them are in Spanish, I believe. There is a summary transla- tion on page 6; The pages are identified in the lower righthand corner of the page, Can you identify these documents? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. They appear to be copies of the transcripts, of portions of transcripts. MI. Goldsmith. What was the date of the conversation that was reflected in this transcript? Ms, Goodpasture. The one on page 4 is dated 21 Septem- ber 1963 g Mr. Goldsmith. At what time did this conversation take 001231 HM 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 91 ALGERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 92 1-90 2 place, directing your attention to page number 6. Ms. Goodpasture. About five minutes after 4:00. Mr. Goldsmith. What was the source of this conversa- tion? REPORTERS BUTInING. MASHTNGTON, D. C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 Ms. Goodpasture. The source was the liaison. The •10 !! 12 13 STRELT, 15 1á 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 source? MI. Goldsmith. Which telephone was being tapped? Ms. Goodpasture. The Soviet Embassy telephone. Mr. Goldsmith. This was an incoming call, is thät correct? Ms. Goodpasture. It was an incoming call from the Cuban consulate. Mr. Goldsmith. On page 6, to the right of the numbers in parentheses, 1605, it says; IN. What does that stand for? Ms • Goodpasture. .. 1605 is the hour the call occurred. Mt. Goldsmith. Right. IN, What does that stand for? Ms• Goodpasture. In. MI, Goldsmith. OV, what does that stand for? Ms. Goodpasture. That would be the voice outside. MI. Goldsmith. Have you ever seen this document, or copy of it, before? Ms • Goodpasture. Seen what? MI. Goldsmith. Have you ever seen this document, or a copy of it, before? Ms Goodpasture. I have seen what I think was a copy 001232 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC HY 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 92 --- ## Page 93 1-91 2 (202) ITH STREET, S.V. REPORTERS BUILDING. WASHENGTON, 12 13 14 15 8 20 of this document before, but this translation is a summary, not a translation, and when we reviewed this a year ago we determined that it was not correct and a new transcription was made. Mr. Goldsmith. Is it true that you determined that it was correct in substance, however it was not complete?. Ms. Goodpasture. No. It gave the wrong impression in substance. Mr. Goldsmith.: At this time, I would like to draw your attention to document B-1, which is attached to Stack B, just two pages. Ms • Goodpasture.: Yes. MI. Goldsmith, There are two pages in document B-1, is that correct? Ms• Goodpasture: Right. MI. Goldsmith. Does one of them contain a conversation from September 27, 1963 at 1605 hours? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Is that accurate? Ms. Goodpasture. To the best of my knowledge, it is. Mr. Goldsmith. An accurate summary of that conversa tion? 23 24 23 Ms • Goodpasture. Yes Mr. Goldsmith, You have indicated that you have seen this document before. I am not referring to B-l. I am going 001233 ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY. INC. NN 50955 DooId:32277224 Page 93 --- ## Page 94 1-92 2 3 20024 300 TTy STREET. S.V. REFORTERS NUTI.DING, UASINOTON. 10 2 13 15 1á 17 18 17 20 73 back to page 4 of document B. Ms. Goodpasture. Page 4? Mr. Goldsmith. There is a routingindication that indicates that you have seen this document before, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. When was the first time that you saw this document? Ms • Goodpasture. Probably within a day after the conversation occurred. Well, it would not have been the day after. This was on the 27th, It would have been picked up on the following Monday. Mr. Goldsmith. What action, if any, was taken in response? Ms. Goodpasture. These were routed to the Minells. Mr. Goldsmith. When was the first time that this conversation was linked to Lee Harvey Oswald? Ms • Goodpasture. I do not know. MI. Goldsmith. Let us turn to pages 7 and 8 of document Ba. Can you identify this document? Ms• Goodpasture, Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. What is that? Ms.: Goodpasture. It appears to be a copy of a part of l transcript: MI. Goldsmith. Does it reflect a telephone conversation 001234 ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC. HY 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 94 --- ## Page 95 1-93 2 3 5 that came in on September 27, 1963, at 4:26? Ms. Goodpasture. This is a telephone conversation on the Soviet Embassy line, different from the different telephone number and it is out to the Cuban Embassy from a man inside the Soviet Embassy making the call to Sylvia Duranda at the Cuban Embassy • Mr. Goldsmith. Have you ever seen this document before? Ms. Goodpasture, I have seen the original, yes. Mr. Goldsmith. When did you see that for the first 10 time? 13 14 15 30n STREET, 17 20 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. Probably with a couple of days after it occurred. Mr. Goldsmith. When was this document linked to Lee Harvey Oswald? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. 'I think after the assassination, Mr. Goldsmith. How long were the CIA and Mexico City station's tapes concerning Oswald's conversations with Cuban and Soviet officials maintained? MS. Goodpasture. I think they were probably destroyed at the same time that other tapes for that period were destroyed. The translations concerning the part where he attempted to speak in Russian, the tapes which were taken to Tarasoff may have been retained a longer time or a shorter time. I do not know. 001235 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HH 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 95 --- ## Page 96 1-94 Mr. Goldsmith. Why would they have been retained a longer 2 3 5 time? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, occasionally he kept voice samples, but I do not know if he kept one of this call, or MASICTON, D. C. 20024 (202) 554-2315 not. 300 ITH STREET, REFORTERS 10 11 • 12 :13 15 15 17 19 20 Mr. Goldsmith. At the time of the assassination, did the Mexico City station have on hand the tapes of the Oswald conversations? Ms. Goodpasture. Not to my knowledge. Mr. Goldsmith. To your knowledge, was a voice comparison ever made between the tapes to determine whether the same person was speaking in each one? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. I did not make one: I do not know whether someone else made one or not. There is transcript, a cable here, in which the transcriber of the Soviet tape says that it is the same voice, which would lead one to believe that he made a voice comparison, but it just may have been that he, from his memory, came to that conclu sion. 23 24 25 Mr. Goldsmith, I would like to refer you now to Stack C and, in Stack C, if you would kindly refer to page 57,. please. Ms, Goodpasture. Page? MI; Goldsmith, Page 57g Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, 001236 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC HM 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 96 --- ## Page 97 1-95 2 20024 (202) 554-2345 HASHTROTON: 10 i2 13 14 15 ITH STREET, 17 18 19 20 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith. On the lower righthand corner of the newspaper article that is contained there, marked off with a dark line is a paragraph. Kindly read that paragraph, starting with the words, "The investigators." (Pause) Ms. Goodpasture. This would suggest - MI. Goldsmith. One moment. Ms. Goodpasture. - Tarasoff compared the voices on a tape of October. Mr. Goldsmith, Whose handwriting appears? Ms, Goodpasture. That is mine. Mx. Goldsmith. That is your handwriting? Ms, Goodpasture. That is mine. Mr. Goldsmith, That indicates that the caller - could you please read that to us. Read what you wrote that day. Ms, Goodpasture. The cäbler from the Cuban Embassy was unidentified until headquarters sent traces on Oswald. Now, that would have been in answer to the cable that was dated 8th October. I believe their cable was 18 October, and voices compared by was the pseudonym used by Tarasoff. Mx. Goldsmith. In fact, that indicates -- Ms. Goodpasture, He compared the Cuban Embassy voices with the others, with Oswald's call, in which he used his name. 001237 ALOERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DooId:32277224 Page 97 --- ## Page 98 1-96 2 3 RETORTERS NUROTAG, MASHINCTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 551-2345 5 ó 7 10 11 12 13 Mr.: Goldsmith. When would that have happened? Ms. Goodpasture. I said 18 October because I thought thät was the date of the cable. 10 October. Mr. Goldsmith. What happened to that tape containing Oswald's voice? Ms. Goodpasture. What happened? ME. Goldsmith. What happened to that tape, yes. Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. MI. Goldsmith. Do those tapes exist today? Ms• Goodpasture. What? Mr.. Goldsmith. Do those tapes exist today? Ms, Goodpasture.: If they do, I do not know where they are, ITH STKEET, 15 17 19 20 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith. Are you aware of the fact that, after the assassination, it has been alleged that some tapes were given to the FBI to listen to and that it was said that these tapes contained Oswald's voice on them? Ms. Goodpasture. Someone asked me about that, but I do not think that I had those tapes, I do not remember if I did, and I was not aware that we gave any to the FBI. I do not know whether MI. Minell • got tapes from Mr. Tarasoff and passed them to the FBI, or if the Chief of Station or Deputy passed anything to the FBI. I just do not know. MI. Goldsmith. At any time, did anyone in the Mexico atrick tin 001238 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 98 --- ## Page 99 1-97 2 3 3 10 12 13 15 18 19 20 2! 23 24 25 City station find any photographs showing Lee Harvey Oswald? "Ms. Goodpasture. Notuto my knowledge. Mr. Goldsmith. How many times did Oswald visit the Cuban and Soviet embassies and consulates? Ms • Goodpasture. We did an analysis of the conversa- tions which indicated, I think, five times. MI. Goldsmith. He visited the embassy and consulate approximately five times? And even though he visited these places five times, the station's photosurveillance operations never took a picture of him, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. MI. Goldsmith. Is there any reason that you can give as to why the photosurveillance operation, having had five shots at Mr. Oswald, nevertheless -- Ms, Goodpasture.: I could speculate, but I just assume that he went there later in the day than they were still wroking. Mx. Goldsmith. In effect, they would have had an opportunity to get a picture of Mr. Oswald, or the person who said he was Mr. Oswald, when he went into the embassy and when he went out of there, so really, there were ten oppor- tunities to take pictures of Mr. Oswald and yet there was no picture taken of him, Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. 001239 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 99 --- ## Page 100 1- 9 8 2 3 554-2345 5 7 8 REPORTEAS DUTLONG, MASHINGTON, n. C. 10 11 12 •13 30Л IT STREET, 17 18 19 20 21 2 23 24 25 Mr. Goldsmith. Earlier, you indicated that Winston Scott was a conscientious administrator, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. After the assassination, was he satis- fied with the performance of the photo-surveillance operation in regard to this particular matter? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, we still did not have the exact times that Oswald went to these places, the inferences that he used and we could not prove that one of our people was sitting there, making photographs, and missed him, Human error if the photograph station was working that he was missed. Mr. Golasmith. Without intending to sound argumenta tive in any way, I would raise the question that needs to be raised, which is how efficient is the photosurveillance operation that has ten opportunities to take a picture of someone and apparently fails in each instance? Ms, Goodpasture. I think the people that were handling the photobase at that time sat down and tried to figure out why it happened. As I recall, they did not think it was terribly unusual. I think the Cubans said their machinery was not . functioning, and I think for the Soviets it was ata time when they were not working, but I am not sure. Mr, Goldsmith. Did you, or anyone else, find a picture 001240 ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY. INC. AW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 100 --- ## Page 101 1-99 2 3 5 ó ITH STREET, S.W. REPORIERS RUELDIMG, 10 !: 12 13 14 $ 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 of someone else who was at the embassies at the time when Oswald was thought to have gone there? Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? Mr. Goldsmith. Did you or anybody else find a picture of somebody who went to the Cuban or Soviet embassies at a time whenoswald was thought to have gone there? Ms. Goodpasture. No. We found a photograph of a man but later it was determined that he went there after Oswald had left. Ms. Goldsmith, When you found this particular photo- graph, did you think that it pertained to Oswald? Ms. Goodpasture. We did not know, because at the time that photograph was found, as I recall, we did not know that Oswald had already left there, It was not until after the assassination that we had the dates of Oswald's departure from Mexico. Up until the assassination time and after the assassina- tion, it still could have been pertinent that this man who was unidentified could have been Oswald if he had been still there the 15th. Mr. Goldsmith. But the agency or the Mexico City sta- tion never made a connection between this man and Oswald? Ms , Goodpasture, No. Mr. Goldsmith. I have just handed you a document that shows an individual. The background, the document contains a ALOERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 001241 AW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 101 --- ## Page 102 1-100 20024 (202) 5516-2345 ó 3 ITH STREET. S.W. REPORTERS MUTIDING. NOSIONGTON, 10 12 13 17 18 19 20 23 24 23 copy of the photograph that was taken of an individual. The background to the document has been cropped out, is that correct? Ms • Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Is this the man whose picture was taken leaving the Cuban or Soviet embassy? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes: Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to refer you to Stack c, page 2. We have reviewed this particular document before. Do you have it before you? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. We reviewed this document earlier today, have we not? Ms: Goodpasture. Right. MI. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to the first paragraph, it indicates, does it not, on 1 October 63 an American male speaking broken Russian made contact with the Soviet embassy. Is that correct? Ms Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. In the second paragraph, it refersito a photograph, does it not? Ms • Goodpasture.: Yes. Mr, Goldsmith. Does the second paragraph refer to the photograph I have just given you? Ms, Goodpasture. Right. 001242 ¿LOERSON REPORTINO COMFANY. INC. HN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 102 --- ## Page 103 1-101 2 3 REPORTERS BUILDING, MASHTNOTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 7 STREET, 10 • !! 12 13 14 15 1á 17 18 20 23 24 25 Mr. Goldsmith. Does it refer to the photograph I have just given you a copy of? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. It refers to a photograph of this man. I am not sure that these photographs were made. Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, nine or ten photographs may have been taken of this particular man? We do not know that this was the particular one taken on that day, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. Why was the reference made in this cable to a photograph taken on October I, 1963? Ms. Goodpasture. It should have been October 2. That October Ist was the wrong date. I showed you the log yesterday -to show you how that error occurred. MI. Goldsmith. At this point, let us look at the 109. In order to do that, you will have to look at Stack A. It is A-4. I believe it is marked Stack A-4. Do you have that before you? Do you have the log before you? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. Looking at the log, can you now explain to the Committee why the cable referred to a photo- graph taken on October Ist when actually it was taken on another day? Ms. Goodpasture. If you look at the log here you see at the top - it was just an oversight on the part of the person who was writing that cable. It looks as though the 001243 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 103 --- ## Page 104 1-102 2 3 5 10 12 13 15 300 17 18 19 20 31 23 24 23 date is 1 October, but if you read it very closely you see there are only two frames that were shot on 1 October and 2 October, it starts up with frame number 3, et cetera, et cetera, and there the shots occur. That is the only explana tion I can give. Mr. Goldsmith. Is your explanation that whomever referred to the log simply looked at the date at the top of the page, the date being October Ist, and did. not see any reference tolthe date October 2nd? Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. Getting back to the cable, what is the date of the cable? Ms • Goodpasture. & October. Mr. Goldsmith. If the photograph was taken on October 2nd, what was the reason for the delay in transmitting this information to headquarters? Ms. Goodpasture.. It took about a week for processing, generally. Two or three days. Someone had to go out and get it and bring it in. Mr. Goldsmith. You indicated earlier in your testimony that the photograph you found was never linked to Oswald, yet paragraph. 2 of this cable is tied in to paragraph 1 which specifically refers to an American male who said his name was Oswald. Does that not indicate that, in fact, the link was made? 001244 ALDERSON REFORTNG COMPANY. INC. HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 104 --- ## Page 105 3 300 ITH STREET •N. REFORTERS BULLDING, DASHINGTON, D. C. 20029 (202) 554-2345 7 9 10 12 13 1-103 Ms. Goodpasture. As I said, the link was made earlier. It did not relate to Oswald. That was hindsight. At the time this cable was written, the person who wrote it thought it could possibly have related to Oswald. Mr. Goldsmith. I believe that my question earlier was clear. If you have a problem understanding my questions, please tell me. Are there any questions at this time? Mr. Preyer. No. Mr. Goldsmith. When did the inaccurate description of Oswald contained in the first paragraph first come to your attention? Ms. Goodpasture.: Page 3? Mr. Goldsmith. Let us take a look at page 3. Can you identify the cable that appears on page 3? Ms. Goodpasture. The description in paragraph 1 of Oswald is different than the description in paragraph 2. Mr. Goldsmith. What is the cable that is found on page 17 18 19 20 3? 23 21 23 Ms. Goodpasture. That is a cable from Washington headguarters sent to Mexico in reply to the Mexico cable to headquarters. This is giving headquarters tracing on Oswald. Mr Goldsmithae When was this cable sent? Ms • Goodpasture. When was it sent? 001245 ALDERSON REFORTINO COMPANY. INC. WW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 105 --- ## Page 106 1-104 MI. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms. Goodpasture. The day that is on there is 10 October 1963. 3 551-2345 $ REPORTERS BUILDING, MASHINCION, D. 10 !! 12 13 15 ЗАЛ ITH STREET, 17 18 19 20 23 25 Mr. Goldsmith. Is it your testimony, then, that based upon the description of swald in paragraph 1 of that cable it was realized that the photograph that had been taken on October 2nd in fact did not show Oswald? Ms. Goodpasture. It was realized that it was not Oswald. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like now to refer to page 5. Mr. Dodd. Counsel, just one point. What was your response to that last question? Mr. Goldsmith. I believe Congressman Dodd has a question. MI. Dodd. What was your response to that last question? Ms. Goodpasture. The last question, that the identifi- cation of Oswald that they had a file trace on in the Washing- ton cable was different from the one that the description of the man who was in the photograph. Mr. Dodd. You reached that conclusion on what day; with the 10 October '63 cable, what day would you have received that on that day, 10 October? Ms. Goodpasture. We would have received it on about the 10th or Ilth of October, within a day from the time it was sent here. And I said we reached that conclusion. There 001246 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 106 ANDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 107 1-105 3 REPORTERS NUILDING MASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 S 8 10 12 13 15 17 ITH STREET, 19 20 ?! 23 24 23 was controversy there over whether this man could have been Oswald. Mr. Dodd. Counsel, why do you not proceed? Mr. Goldsmith. Would you describe the controversy that you are referring to, Miss Goodpasture, over whether this man was Oswald?. Ms. Goodpasture. I felt that it was not Oswald. MI. Goldsmith. When did you feel this? At the time that the cable was sent? Ms. Goodpasture. As soon as we got the description, because I did not think this man, this photograph, could possibly be the same man that was described here. Mr. Goldsmith. What actions were taken at that point to clarify the situation? Ms. Goodpasture. I had an argument, I think, with the Deputy Chief of Station, MI. Scott, over it. He said, oh, that may be incorrect and so forth. But there was quibbling over it. Mr. Goldsmith. Going back to the cable that appears on page 2, I am still not sure that I understand why the photo was sent to headquarters. What indication did you have that Oswald had been to the Cuban or Russian Embassy on October Ist of 2nd of 1963? The transcripts that we reviewed earlier gave no indica- tion that he was going to be there on that day. 0012477 H₩ 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 107 ALDERSON REPORTING COMFANY, INC --- ## Page 108 1-106 2 3 (202) 554-2345 S Ms. Goodpasture. What was that again now? Mr. Goldsmith. The transcript that we reviewed earlier Ms. Goodpasture. Right. MI. Goldsmith. Gave no indication that Oswald was going to be at the Russian or Cuban Embassy on October Ist or 2nd. Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. But once this mistake was made and this cable was sent, it was compounded, because the cable was used as reference material, rather than 1 going back to the log. We did not get around to correcting that date. 300 1TH STREET, S.l1. REPORTERS BUILDING. 10 1! 12 13 14 15 17 20 21 2] 24 25 MI. Goldsmith. I understand that but, however, at the time this cable was sent, it refers to an American male entering the Soviet Embassy. on October ist and now we find that it really was October 2nd., And apparently you checked the production logs for October Ist and 2nd. My question is; since the transcripts gave no indication that Oswald had been at the Embassy on October Ist or 2nd why was this picture connected to Oswald?. You have no inde- pendent information that Oswald had been to the Embassy on October lst or 2nd? Ms: Goodpasture. That is true, but we could not tell from this conversation on the lst that he did not go there? We also could not tell from our transcripts that he had left the area and that there was a possibility that he had gone 001248 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 108 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 109 1-107 2 3 5 ó 7 3 10 J00. OTH STREET, S:U. REPORTERS BUILDING, 12 13 15 15 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 23 there without calling. MI. Goldsmith. You checked the photosurveillance materials for approximately a four or five day period, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, I think it is. Mr. Goldsmith. During that four of five day period Oswald was the only -- not Oswald. This man was the only non-Latin appearing man whose photograph you found, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. I think that it was the only non- Latin appearing person's photograph that we found that we could not identify as somebody else. A lot of the people who went to the Soviet Embassy all the time, we came to know who they were. After they had been identified, they made frequent visits there. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to refer your attention now to page 5. Mr. Preyer. Counsel, may I speak to you for a moment? (Discussion off the record.) Mr. Dodd. Miss Goodpasture, I am checking on the time remaining for questioning. Counsel indicates that he would require something less than another hour. Is that right? Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms. Goodpasture. Can you stand it • that much bonger? Let us get it over with. 001249 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 109 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC --- ## Page 110 1-108 MI. Preyer. Would you prefer ahead and get it over : 2 with? 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 7 3 REPORTERS BUILDING. HASHINCTON. 10 12 3 300 7T1 STREET, 15 15 17 18 19. 20 23 24 Ms. Goodpasture. I would rather get it over with, if you can stand it. Mx. Preyer. All right. I think we might proceed at this time. • I will have to excuse myself. MI. Goldsmith., For purposes of clarification, the reason that this particular photograph was selected was because during the four or five day period in which the photo productioniots were checked, this individual was the only non-latin appearing male whom your personnel in the Mexico City station were unable to identify, is' that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to page 5 -- before we get into page 5, was Oswald's, or the person whom you thought was Oswald, was his appearance at the Embassy considered to be unusual or of any significant interest? Ms. Goodpasture, Would you ask that question again? I am not sure I understood. Mr. Goldsmith. Was. thecfact that Oswald or the person whom you identified as Oswald appeared at the embassies when he did, was that considered unusual? Ms. Goodpasture. No. Frequently there were callers, people who were American citizens, long distance calls, local 001250 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 110 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 111 1-109 2 3 300 PTH STREET, S. 11. REFORTIRS PURIDING, FISHINGTON. D. C.. 20024 (202) 5546-2345 ó 7 3 calls, and so many of them were crackpots, in a sense, that it was just another one, another name that we might or might not identify. But when we found that there was no record in our file traces it did not mean anything to us exceptaa name at that time. Mr. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention now to page 5 of the cable that was sent to the Mexico City station from the CIA headquarters, this is page 5 of stack C -- Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the releasing officer for this 10 11 12 13 cable? 17 13 19 20 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. Who wrote it? MI. Goldsmith. Who was the releasing officer? Ms. Goodpasture. The releasing officer? Mr. Goldsmith. Xes. Ms. Goodpasture. The Acting Director for Plans. His name was Tom Karamessinas. Mr. Goldsmith. At that time, MI. Karamesinas was the Director for Plans? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. I think Assistant Director, excuse me. Mr. Goldsmith. Under what circumstances would somebody like Karamessinas serve as a releasing officer? Ms• Goodpasture. I do not know. It may have been the hour of the day that it was sent. He may have been the only 001251 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 111 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.. --- ## Page 112 1-110 2 3 s.M. REPORTERS BUILDING, vasHHOTOw, o.c. 20024 (202) 554-2345 3 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 300 17 18 19 20 21 23 26 25 person still around at that time. Mr. Goldsmith. MIs: Karamessinas? Ms • Goodpasture. I was in Mexico so I would not really know why he did it at headquarters. Mr. Goldsmith. I understand. Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. Mr. Karamessinas' position was a relatively high one in the CIA hierarchy, is that correct? Ms • Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. This was a matter that was not considered to be of particular significance, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. It was not significant to us at the time that - before we got the name trace. It may have been considered significant here in Washington because it was possibly because he was a former defector. Mr. Goldsmith. I see. The Washington authorities may have regarded this as significant and upon receipt of this cable in Mexico City station, I believe you indicated before that MI. Tarasoff apparently made a voice comparison of the taped conversations. Is that correct? Ms • Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. If headquarters considered this matter to be significant, would they have been apprised of the results of this voice comparison? Ms. Goodpasture, I do not know whether they would of 001252 NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 112 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 113 1-111 not: 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2345 S 8 MACINGTON, 10 !! 13 REPONTERS JOn TTU STREET, 15 1á 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 23 M8. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine procedure? Ms. Goodpasture. The voice comparison only indicated that he called the Soviet embassy and the Cuban embassy. We had his name, a name, Oswald, in the traffic to the Soviet embassy, to start off with, and the only thing the voice comparison did, it tied in that name, but we had no way of identifying our caller exactly with the subject of this trace. MI. Goldsmith. Are you saying, then, that the fact that Oswald, the fact that you were able to, by voice compari- son, establish that he had been to the Cuban Embassy and the Soviet Embassy was not significant? Ms. Goodpasture, That is what we said in the note. In the transcripts, he called the Soviet embassy from the Cuban embassy, a man, and that voice by the Russian trans- criber was identified as the same voice as the person who said his name was Lee Oswald. MI. Goldsmith. I understand that. But headquarters was never apprised of that voice comparison? Ms. Goodpasture. I think they were in a cable. Mr. Goldsmith. Prior to the assassination? • Ms. Goodpasture. No, I do not think they were prior to the assassination. MI: Goldsmith. Apparently the fact that the Lee Harvey 001253 NN 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 113 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 114 1-112 5 2002% (202) REPORTERS PUTIDING, MASMINGTON, 10 12 13 •15 ITH STREET, 18 20 21 22 23 24 23 Oswald was considered significantly significant. for Mr. Karamessinas to be the releasing officer of the cable to the Mexican station and a voice comparison is made for the purpose of determining essentially whether Oswald had been to both the Cuban and the Soviet Embassy. According to your testi mony, the results of that voice comparison were that in fact it was the same person. Are you saying that the fact that Oswald had been to both the Cuban and the Russian embassy was not considered sufficiently important to notify headquarters prior to the assassination? Ms. Goodpasture. No, because at that stage, we had no way of proving that the man who made that call in Mexico was the same man that this trace was about. Mr. Goldsmith. The cable from headquarters gives back- ground information on Mr. Oswald, does it not? Ms• Goodpasture. Right.. We assumed that it probably was. MI. Goldsmith. Right. After receiving the cable, a voice comparison is made. It is determined that the same person was talking on each tape and there is no follow-up to headquarters, even though headguarters clearly considered this to be significant? Ms. Goodpasture. The follow-up was made by disseminat- ing this information from the traces locatly and trying 001254 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 114 ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANT. INC --- ## Page 115 1-113 554-2395 (202) 2002% WASHINCTON, REPORTERS BULLDING. S.U. 3O0 ITH STREET, 2 3 ó 7 3 10 11 12 13 15 18 19 20 21 23 24 23 identify Oswald, trying to locate the man. That is the way the follow up was made. We thought that he may still be in Mexico. Mr. Goldsmith. The point is, however, that upon the making of a voice comparison, if, in fact, that was done, that information was not communicated to anyone. Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know if it was or not. You would have to check the file completely, the cable traffic, to see if it was. Io the best of my knowledge, it was not until after the assassination. MI. Goldsmith. If it were not, would that be unusual? MS. Goodpasture. NO. MX: Goldsmith. Despite the fact that this was considered something of significance by headquarters? Ms. Goodpasture. Headquarters - no, because they could not have done anything with the voice comparison. Mx. Goldsmith. Perhaps they could not have done any thing with the voice comparison, but they may have considered it to be even more serious had they been informed that not only had Oswald been to the Soviet Embassy but he also had been to the Cuban Embassy- Ms. Goodpasture. I think they knew that, because the call from the Soviet Embassy came from the Cuban Embassy. MI. Goldsmith. Your cable of October 3th, does that. NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 115 indicate that the call came fron the Cuban Embassy? Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 001255 --- ## Page 116 1-114 2 3 5 JON ITH STREET S.H. REPONTERS BUTLDINO, MASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 ( 202) 554-2345 7 $ 10 !! 12 13 15 1á iT. 20 21 23 24 23 MI. Goldsmith.:: Your cable of October 8th, I am referring now to page 2. Does that give any indication that the call came from the Cuban Embassy? Ms. Goodpasture. The first call was not made - no, it does not. Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, headquarters did not know that he had been to the Cuban Embassy, MS, Goodpasture. Pardon me? MI. Goldsmith. In fact, headquarters did not know that he had also been to the Cuban Embassy: Ms. Goodpasture. At that point, no. MI. Goldsmith. At least, according to your recollec- tion, it was not until after the assassination that head- quarters was informed of that fact. Ms. Goodpasture. That is probably right. Mr. Goldsmith. Have you ever spoken to Mr. Karasmes- sinas about this matter? Ms • Goodpasture. Pardon me? Mr. Goldsmith. Have you ever spoken to Mr. Karamessinas about this matter? Ms. Goodpasture. No, and I do not think that in Mexico that we would have known that Tom Karamessinas signed off on this cable, beause the cable that came down there did not have the names of the people on them. This is a headquarters file copy that you are working 001256 WH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 116 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 117 1-115 with here and it is next to a copy from the Mexico station file. 3 REPORTERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 7 $ 10 !1. 12 3 15 7TH STREET 17. 13 19 20 27 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith. There are other indications on the cable as well that headquarters regarded this incident to be significant, is that not true? The cable also contains other indications that indicated that headquarters regarded this matter to be significant, is that not true? For example, in paragraph 4 -- I am referring now to page 5 of Stack C, paragraph 4 -- it says, "Station should pass info RIF (1) and it gives cryptonyms of various govern- mental agencies. Certainly that is an indication that headquarters regarded this as significant. Ms. Goodpasture. That Information was taken immediately and all efforts were made to locate the man in Mexico, think- ing that he was still there, but this cable. did not tell us that he had come back to the states. Mr. Goldsmith. I understand. The only point I am making here, this is a spearate indication that headquarters regarded this to be a matter of significance, the fact that they told you to pass along information to other people. Ms • Goodpasture. That is right. MI. Dodd. Counsel? (Discussion off the record.) Mr. Dodd: We are going to take a five or so minute recess: There is a recorded vote on the Floor. I will give 001257 HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 117 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC: --- ## Page 118 1-116 3 3O0 PTH STREET. S.V. REPORTERS BUSIDING. NASHNGTON, D.С. 20024 (202) 551-2345 10 12 13 14 15. you aminute to get a breather and I will be right. back to continue with the questioning. The Committee will stand in recess for five minutes. (A brief recess was taken.) MI. Dodd. At the time that we took the recess, and I responded to a recorded vote, Counsel was proceeding with questions. I would ask counsel to continue with those questions. Mr. Goldsmith. Thank you. One question that was out of the line of my inquiry that I was making prior to the recess, at the time that the Oswald reco-ding was obtained, did you or anyone else go to Boris Tarasoff and indicate to him that this was a matter of special importance and needed to be transcribed immedi- ately? 17 18 19 20 21 Ms. Goodpasture. The first tape with his voice on it, I cannot remember whether or not I took that to Herb Minell or whether the outside agent took it to Tarasoff, but it was taken to Tarasoff at the same time that it came in from the base: 24 Mr. Goldsmith. Was Tarasoff given special instructions that this particular recording was of unusual importance? Ms: Goodpasture. I am quite sure that he was asked to transcribe it imnediately®: Mr. Goldsmith. Why would he have been asked to transcribe 001258 NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Paye 118 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 119 1-117 3 20024 300 PUH STREET S.H. REFORTERS BUTLDING, BASHTHCTON, 10 12 13 13 1ớ 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 it immediately? Ms. Goodpasture.. So they could find out whether there was any information there under the name Lee Oswald. That was the only transcription that he did except for a short one from the Cuban Embassy staff. Mr. Goldsmith. The first conversation that came in involving Oswald apparently came in on September 27, that he was not identified by name in that conversation. Ms. Goodpasture. No, that is right. Mr. Goldsmith. Was that tape taken to Tarasoff? Is that the one that he was asked to transcribe immediately? Ms. Goodpasture. The one that he was asked to transcribe immediately was the one that had the name on it.. The one that was unidentified, it would also have been taken to him as soon as it came off of the machine, and he would have been asked to transcribe it as soon as he could. MI. Goldsmith, I am not sure I follow you why there was a need to transcribe it immediately. Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? MI. Goldsmith, Why was there a need to have him transcribe it immediately? Ms. Goodpasture. The Lee Oswald one? Mr. Goldsmith Yes. Ms. Goodpasture. The conversation was in Russian, or broken Russian, but it was in a language that the monitors 001259 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 119 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 120 1-I18 3 S ó 10 12 .13 15 300 17 18 19 20 ?1 23 23 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 120 inside could not understand. They could not tell if the man had a telephone number there or if he had an address or if he gave more information in the Russian language than his name The only thing they got was his name, which I believe was in English. Mr. Goldsmith. Even so, why could they not have waited for the ordinary lag time to ensure prior to the transcrip tion of the recording? Ms. Goodpasture. Wait a minute. We are talking about two different things. The reason that he would have been asked, Tarasoff would have been asked, to transcribe it immediately would have been because we had a name connected with it. Most of Tarasoff's transcription work was trans- cribing Russian to English, but the conversations were with persons who were in the Embassy, Soviet personnel, and in that process he built up a backlog. So if something came in that was not a Soviet or something other than the people who we knew there talking, he would have been asked to do that immediately before the chit-chat conversation translations of people who were living in the Embassy: Now do you understand what I am talking about? MI. Goldsmith, I think your explanation is responsive. MI. Dodd, "Counsel, one point I should make gothe 6ú ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 121 1-119 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2315 7 MACHENGTON, 10 !1 12 13 14 REPORTERS 30n PTH STREET 17 18 19 20 21 record. I should mention that Mr. Edgar is replacing MI. Sawyer here for purpose of this hearing. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like, at this point, to refer to page 6 of the documents contained in Stack C. In this regard, can you identify this particular document? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, it is a cover sheet that woüld go over a cable in the Mexico station files. Mr. Goldsmith. Is this the cover sheet that went with the cable that was received from headquarters which gave the correct description of Oswald? Ms. Goodpasture. Probably on the llth of October. That is the date stamped here. Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, number meter tot "ISMs, Goodpasture. No, that is not right. The date is stamped there with the date of the message. The day it was received was 12 October which was the day that is beside Scott's name. MI. Goldsmith. However, the routing slip pertains to cable number 74830. Ms. Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. Which is the one that arrived from Washington that gave the description of Oswald, is that correct? 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. That is correct. MI. Goldsmith. Examining this particular document, 001261 NN 50955 DocId:32207224 Page 121 ALGERSON REPORTINE COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 122 1-120 2 3 REPORTERS BULLDING, HASINGTON, D. C. 20024 (202) 5 ó 7 3 10 12 14 15 ЗO0 ITH STREET, 17 18 •19 20 21 23 24 25 whose handwriting appears in dark, bold script on the right side, the right side of the page? Ms. Goodpasture. The dark print? Mr. Goldsmith. The cursive. Ms. Goodpasture. Please set up P file? MI. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms. Goodpasture, That is Mr. Scott's. MI. Goldsmith. What is a P file? Ms. Goodpasture. Where? MI. Goldsmith.: What is a P file? Ms. Goodpasture. What is one? Mr. Goldsmith, Yes. Ms. Goodpasture. That is a personality file on an individual, an investigative file containing all the informa- tion about a name. MI. Goldsmith. Is that a file that is maintained at a local station? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mx. Goldsmith. How does it differ from the file on an individual that is maintained at • headquarters? Ms. Goodpasture. It is not any different at all. It is the same type of file. Mr, Goldsmith. In terms of the content of the file, would everytng that is in the local file, the P file, be reflected in the headquarters file on the individual? 011262 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 122 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 123 1-121 2 3 ó 7 REPORTERS MUTIDING, MASHINCTON, = 10 '1 12 13 14 15 STR 17 18 19 20 13 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. Not always. It should be, but some- times formal communication was sent to headquarters that was written from several notes. The formal communication, such as the cable, would be in the headquarters files, but if some- one had taken the information down from the conversation on a table napkin, or something, and had not written a formal memorandum for the file, the raw data would not be in the headquarters file. MI. Goldsmith. How long would it take to open a P 'file locally? Ms, Goodpasture. Depending on the workload, it should not take longer than a day to take a file folder out of the cabinet and put the material in and put a label on it. • MI, Goldsmith. Is it likely that Oswald's P file was open shortly after October 12, 1963? Ms, Goodpasture. I would assume so. MI. Goldsmith. Examining the statement in cursive by Mr. Scott, it says, "Please set up P file on Lee Henry Oswald and put all data that we have into it."" "All" is underscored. Do you have any explanation for why Mr. Scott would have bothered to underscore "all"? Ms. Goodpasture. He always did that. You always had the feeling that your files were never complete enough. 001263 HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 123 ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 124 1-122 2 3 20024. (202) 554-2345 300 7T1 STREET 5.H. REPORTERS MUTIDING, NASHTNCTON, 10 12 13 14 15 17 17 20 21 23 24 23 Mr. Goldsmith. If you examined another routing slip by Mr. Scott directing that a P file should be opened, he would also, as a matter of routine, have the "all" under- lined? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. To your knowledge, do you have any information that any materials that should have gone in Oswald's P file were not put into it? Ms, Goodpasture. Not to my knowledge. Mr. Goldsmith. Was Oswald's P file, in fact, complete? Ms. Goodpasture. I think his file was complete. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to refer you to page 7 at this time of the materials contained in Stack C'and could you explain to me and the Congressmen what the difference is between this cable which is marked, in the upper right- hand corner, 74830 and the cable that appears on page 3 that is also marked 74830? Ms: Goodpasture: Number 3? Mr. Goldsmith. Page 3. Ms . Goodpasture. The one on page 7 is a copy of the cable when it was received in Mexico City that was typed up in the Mexico station, The one on page 3 is a copy that was taken from the headquarters file and the way the cable looked when it went out. Page 7 is the way it was received,. You have information 001264 HH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 124 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 125 1-123 3 5 JON ITH STREET, S.W. REPORTERS BULLDING, MASHINCTON, B. 10 12 13 14 15 15 17 3 from the Mexico file and information from a headquarters file put together here. Mr. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine, who would review the cable upon receiving it in Mexico City? Ms. Goodpasture. The first person to get all cable traffic was the Chief of Station and the second person to get it was Alan White. The third person to get it was usually the person to whom it was routed to, that Mr. Scott wanted to see it first. Mr. Goldsmith. On page 7. This appears to be Mr. Scott's handwriting in dark, the dark lines, and the hand- writing. Ms, Goodpasture. Winn Scott!s. Mr. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to the arrow that appears on the upper lefthand corner of this document, the arrow goes from Henry upwards. Do you see that? Ms• Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. To the right of that appears the word "sic." 20 23 24 25 Ms • Goodpasture. Right. MI.. Goldsmith. Underscored. Can you explain that? Ms, Goodpasture. Well, he put "sic" there because he wanted a heading on the P file -- this goes back to the P file -- he wanted the P file to be written Lee Oswald, the 001265 NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 125 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC --- ## Page 126 1-124 2 3 5 3 REPORTERS QUILDING 10 11 12 13 14: 15 15 300 PTU STREET, 18 20 23 24 title on it, also known as lee Henry Oswald. That is what the "sic" designates, that it could be two names. MI. Goldsmith. If that were the case, would not the appropriate way to indicate that be by writing down "aka". instead of "sic" Ms. Goodpasture. "Aka" was also used. Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, my impression is that the term "sicl: is used as a matter of routine in the English language to designate that the item that is referred to is erronEOUS • Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think he meant it in those terms. I think he wanted both names to be on the file. He is another world now and there is no way of finding out. MI. Goldsmith. Understood. In fact, the "sic" points right to the henry and in fact Oswald's real name was Harvey not Herry, is that correct? Ms • Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith.: Did Winn Scott know that Oswald's middle name was Harvey and not Henry? Ms Goodpasture. Not to my knowledge. We had no record of it at the Mexico station. We had no trace on anyone by Oswald. MI. Goldsmith, That is exactly right. It is an impor- tant question Ms, Goodpasture. Right 001266 HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 126 ALOSASON REPORTING COMPANY, INC: --- ## Page 127 1-125 3 5 ó • 20024 (202) 30n ITH STREET S.H. REPORTERS КU11DTIR 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 23 21 That is why, I think, that he must have wanted it so that the file would show lee Oswald and also Lee Henry Oswald. Mr. Goldsmith. If the Committee wanted to verify whether it was standard procedure for Mr. Scott to indicate that a file should be opened under more than one name, for him to indi- cate that by writing down the word "sic," I presume that all we would have to do is to review cable traffic or routing sheets to see if that was a matter of routine, he used that terminology, "sic" is that not correct? Ms • Goodpasture. You could if you wanted. MI. Goldsmith. If, in fact, it turned out that as a matter of routine he did not use the terminology "sic" to refer to the opening of a file under more than one name, that might indicate, would it not, that scott was aware of Oswald's true middle name? Ms. Goodpasture. I would not go so far as to suggest that. You could assume that you thought that he knew, but if he knew it, we certainly had no record of it to my knowledge at the Mexico station. MI. Dodd. Let me step in here for a second. Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think he knew It. MI. Dodd. Let me ask you something, ma'am. What does "sic" mean to you, s-i-c? Ms. Goodpasture. I was just saying that; the way it is 00126% NN 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 127 ALDERSON REPORTING COMFANY, INC. --- ## Page 128 1-126 2 3 551-2345 written Mr, Dodd, What does "sic" mean to you? Ms • Goodpasture. A garbled version of a name. MI. Dodd. Not an aka? Ms. Goodpasture. No. MI. Dodd. There is a distinction between an aka and a sic? 3 9 10 12 13 14 15 30n ITH STREET, S.V. REPORTEES 17 18 19 20 21 23 2% 25 Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Dodd. Are you telling this conmittee that it is your personal knowledge -- Ms. Goodpasture. I am saying, sir, that I think that. what he meant was that lee Oswald, because the first conversa- tion we heard -- MI. Dodd. I understand,. Let me repeat what I think you are saying. Correct me if I am wrong. What you are telling us is that you have personal knowledge that the individual that made that notation there, sic, as a result of your personal knowledge of this individual, he used those words interchangeably all the time, even though you know that those two words have different meanings, or those symbols have different meanings? Ms, Goodpasture. That is not what I mean to say. MI. Dodd. The record indicates that you had some sort of special knowledge that this individual used those symbols interchangeably. 001268 HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 128 ALDERSON REFORTHO COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 129 1-127 2 3 300 721.ST4FET = RETORTISS BUILDING, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 551-2345 10 13 5 1ó 3 20 23 21 25 Ms. Goodpasture. In the context of the way the name Lee Oswald came to our attention the first time, it was in such a way that we could not tell the man was saying his name was Lee and Oswald, or whether his name was Lee Oswald. Mr. Dodd, What notation was made in that reference in the cable traffic when the transcripts - what notation is in parentheses? Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? Mr. Dodd. What notation was in parentheses in the transcripts of the telephone conversations? Does the word phonetic, does that strike a bell in parentheses, phonetic? Ms. Goodpasture. Phonetic, Lee Oswald. When the transcript was first brought to me, the man outside, as I recall, said they do not know if this man is Lee or whether it is Oswald. Mx. Dodd. If they indicated they did not understand, what did they put in parentheses? Ms. Goodpasture. Before the action was taken on the transcript, was taken to the transcriber who prepared an English translation and on the basis of his English trans- lation they felti that, the person who prepared the cable felt, that the name was Lee Oswald. Mr. Dodd. Did they not put phonetic? Ms: Goodpasture. They put phonetic. Mr. Dodd. They did not put sic? 001269 HW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 129 ALOERSON REFORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 130 1-128 2 3 20024 (202) REPORTERS BUILDING, VASHINGTON, 10 11 12 13 15 17 JON TIN STREET, 20 27 23 24 23 Ms. Goodpasture. Meaning that they did not know whether it was spelled ozwald or Oswald, I guess. But I cannot be sure, but the person who prepared the cable is here, Barbara Minell. She might know. MI. Dodd. Counsel and witness, I am going to have to apologize to you one more time. This is one of the burdens of this institution. We have a recorded vote again. We will come right back. (A brief recess was taken.) MI. Dodd. Picking up where we left off at the time we took that recess, I do not want to belabor this point with you. How well did you know Mr. Scott? Ms. Goodpasture. I did not make myself clear. What I meant when I answered his question, I thought, I think, that this refers to the fact that the fist lee Oswald that we had was garbled. Mr. Goldsmith. Where was that? What are you talking about, on the transcripts or the conversation? Ms, Goodpasture. From the transcripts, yes, sir. And we had never seen the name printed and that I thought what he meant that this lee Henry Oswald file should have in it all the information that we had on the man with the name, the garbled name, the Lee Oswald that had come up in the transcripts: That was just my interpretation. I do not know, to 091270 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 130 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 131 1-129 2 5 VASIONICTON, n. C. 20024 10 12 13 REPORTERS 300 PTH STREET 17 18 19 20 27 23 24 23 answer the question truthfully. MI, Dodd.:. Let us go back a little bit and, counsel, I will ask you to assist me on this, but in all of the trans- cripts, was there any middle name or middle initial mentioned? I do not recall seeing any. Mr. Goldsmith. No, there was not. MI. Dodd. That does not explain the letter or the language "sic" by Henry, because they had never been any reference to a Henry or a Harvey® Ms. Goodpasture. That Henry, I think that was the headquarters mistake. This cable originated in headquarters that we are looking at and this is a copy of it as it was received in Mexico. The first time that we received the name on Oswald and the traces it was Lee Henry, and it was later that it became Lee Harvey Mr. Dodd. We are getting away from my point. If it were a question about using a different name as you have properly described Aka, also known as, is the proper letter to use in that kind of situation where a sic, as you have properly defined it, describes an entirely different situation. Ms • Goodpasture. Right. MI. Dodd. My next question is, how well did you know MI. Scott? Didyou know him well? 001271 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 131 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 132 1-130 2 WASHINCTON, n.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 3 10 13 7T1 STREET 13 17 13 19 20 21 23 24 MS • Goodpasture.: I worked there for 11 years when he was there. Mt. Dodd. You knew him fairly well. Ms.Goodpasture. Let me answer it this way. I do not think I knew him well enough to be able to say beyond any reasonable doubt what he meant here by this term MI. Dodd. Were you familiar with his annotations on other cable traffic? Ms. Goodpasture. Well, yes, I think I probably was more familiar than anybody else who was down there at that time because I was down there longer. Mr. Dodd. Did you ever notice that he used these symbols interchangeably in other cable traffic? Ms • Goodpasture. res, I think he would use it.. I have seen him write sic in for a garbled name by the side of it. One garbled version put in for the information on a file traced with another name. MI. Dodd. Thank you, I turn questioning over to counsel. Mr • Göldsmith® Referring to page 6.0f Stack C, Scott indicates that a P file should be opened on lee Henry Oswald does he not? Ms, Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith, He does not indicate that a file should be opened under Lee Oswald and Lee Henry Oswald, does he? 001272 HW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 132 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC --- ## Page 133 1-131 2 3 10 12 13 14 300 7711 STREET S.W. REPORTERS 16 17 13 19 20 In other words; he does not indicate the file should be opened up under two names? Ms. Goodpasture.'Right. MI. Goldsmith. So really there is no basis at all for thinking that the term "sic" indicates what Scott had in mind was an "aka" is there? " There is no basis for reaching that conclusion, is there? Ms. Goodpasture. Would you repeat that again? Mr, Goldsmith. certainly It is apparent from the routing indication on page 6 that Scott wanted the file opened on Lee Henry Oswald. Ms • Goodpasture. Right. Mr. Goldsmith. He gave no indication on the routing slip that he wanted the file open up under the name Lee Henry Oswald aka Lee Oswald. There is no indication that the file was to be opened up under two names. In light of that, there is really no basis, is there, for concluding that the use of the phrase sic on page 7 refers to the term aka? Ms. Goodpasture. My interpretation that the use of the word sic was for the lee Oswald, the first name in there on page and that all of the information about that name that we did not know the full name on would go into the other file, 23 14 23 Mr. Goldsmith, The "sic" is pointing to the word "Henry" is it not? 001273 HW 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page 133 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 134 1-132 2 3 RETORTERS BULLDING, WASHINGTON, D.C. 2002% (202) 554-2345 5 ó 3 10 !1 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 23 23 Ms • Goodpasture. I feel that refers to the first Lee Oswald in place of Lee Henry Oswald, the first line. We could argue that. Mr. Goldsmith. Is not the arrow pointed right over and in between the "e" and "n'"in the word "Henry"? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right, but it is also pointing right to the beginning of the lee Oswald name. To answer your question, I do not know. MI. Goldsmith. In any event, "sic" does not mean "aka" does it? Ms • Goodpasture: That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Scott did not use those terms interchangeably, did he? Ms. Goodpasture., Did he Mr. Goldsmith. Use the term "sic" pas-i-c, and the term "aka". interchangeably? He did not, as a matter of custom, do that, did he? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not recall having seen him use aka that much at all. I have seen sic several times after a name when there was no middle initial or where there was. question about spelling. Mr. Goldsmith. I do not believe that the answer was responsive. Do you know whether he used the term "sic" and "aka" interchangeably? MS, Goodpasture. No, I do not know. 001274 AH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 134 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 135 1-133 2 3 vENINGTON, D.С. 20024 (202) 554-2345 10 12 Mr. Goldsmith. You testified earlier, I belleve, that upon receipt of this cable, the Tarasoffs, or Boris Tarasoff, made a voice comparison. Is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That - Mr. Goldsmith. Your testimony earlier, I believe, was that upon receipt of this cable from headquarters, Boris Tarasoff made a voice comparison of the tape recordings? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. And they concluded -- Ms. Goodpasture. At some time after receipt of this cable, according to receipt of that note, I do not know when. 300 ITH STREET, S.W. REFORTERS 15 15 17 18 19 20 Mr. Goldsmith. He concluded that it was the same person on both tapes, is that correct? Ms, Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. I would like you to refer now to page 21 in Stack C, page 21. Ms. Goodpasture. One moment, MI. Goldsmith. We will make that page 22. Can you identify this document? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, This is a copy of a cable that was sent from headquarters to Washington.: Mr. Coldsmith. Who was the originating officer of this 23 24 25 cable? Ms . Goodpasture. I am. 001275 AW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 135 ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY INC. --- ## Page 136 1-134 MI. Goldsmith. Who was the authenticating officer of 2 JON ITH STREET. 5.11. REPONTERS BUILDING, CASINGTON, D.C. 2002º (202) 554-2345 7 3 10 12 13 14 $ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 136 this cable? Ms. Goodpasture. I am. Mr. Goldsmith. What is your understanding of the term "authenticating officer"? What does that term mean? Ms. Goodpasture. Someone who has the authority to sign a cable, to release it. Mr. Goldsmith. Would an authenticating officer simply sign a cable and release it, or is there anything that he would do before signing? Ms. Goodpasture. The releasing officer was a superior officer. MI, Goldsmith. It would be the responsibility of the authenticating officer, would it not, to verify the accuracy of the contents of the cable? Is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, that would be his responsibility. MI. Goldsmith. Drawing your attention to the bottom of page 22, please read the second paragraph. It continues on to page 23. (Pause) Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Specifically, this seers to indicate that the station is unable to compare the voice of the first tape, which was erased pror to the receipt of the second call? Is that true? Is that what the document indicates? 001276 ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 137 1-135 2 3 3 300 7T1 STREET, s.l1. REPORTERS BULLDING. VASIENGTON, D. C. 10 12 13 15 17 18 20 23 24 23 Ms • Goodpasture. Right. MI. Goldsmith. Do you have any explanation for the inconsistency between this document and your earlier testimony that there was a voice comparison made? Ms, Goodpasture. The only explanation that I can make is that the Soviet transcriber made it on the basis of not listening to the two tapes again over, but on his memory of yes, that is the same man that I listened to and transcribed the tape fron the Soviet Embassy, the man who called himself Lee Oswald. MI. Dodd, Counsel, I do not want to interrupt you. Mrs. Goodpasture, you worked a long time in that Embassy, you are very familiar with technical terms and terminology that are used. Now, when you are doing a voice comparison and what all of that means, a voice comparison, that is a rather technical description of something, and you just stated a minute ago that a voice comparison was made. I would assume by that that you are telling this Committee - and we are grateful that you are here, we appreciate your testimony. We have a very difficult job in front of us. We are trying to get to the botton of this whole story, and you are making it difficult. I do not like to have to tell you that, but you are. You are using the term "voice comparison" and you are indicating 00127 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 137 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 138 1-136 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 30л YTH STREET, S.l. REPORTERS BUILDING, HASHTSTON, 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 17 20 to this committee that there was analysis made of a person's voice, not the memory of a transcriber. It is a technical job. It is not something that you leave to somebody who is merely a translator, and you just finished telling us that a voice comparison was made. Your own memorandum there on page 21 says that, in fact, one could not have been made. What is the truth here? Ms, Goodpasture. I think that what happened was that the voice comparison, by taking the two tapes, I think the tape. had been destroyed, Based on my memory now -- MI. Dodd. What you just said a minute ago Ms. Goodpasture. To tell you the truth, I do not remember. Mr. Dodd. What you just said a moment ago is not true, then, that there is not a voice comparison? Ms, Goodpasture, What I said a moment ago was based on a note that had been made in the files, that the transcriber hadicompared the voices, and this note was written 14 years ago. 23 21 25 Mr. Dodd. Based upon your working knowledge of the terminology of voice comparison, does that normally involve listening to two tapes with someone who is technically trained to make a determination as to whether of not the voices on two different tapes are one and the same person? 001278 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC HH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 138 --- ## Page 139 1-137 2 20024 (202) 554-2345 10 12 SON PTH STREET, 5. W. REPORTEKS BUTLDING, Ms. Goodpasture. The way it was used, to me it would also mean that a person who had listened to two tapes at different times and said that they were the same, that it would be a comparison by him. Mr. Dodd. That was considered a bona fide voice comparison? Ms. Goodpasture. Not in the technical sense that you are referring to. You are correct. MI. Dodd. Counsel, you may proceed. I am awfully confused about your statement. Ms• Goodpasture. I apologize for that. It is a con fusion tame of so much material at one time, going over it and the details of it. But I honestly do not remember being present when those tapes were listened to, or a conversation relating to it, It was this material that came up in the files. 1á 17 20 21 22 23 •24 23 Mr. Dodd. You understand, when you are talking aout voices being compares, you are comparing a tape of someone speaking. Ms• Goodpasture. Right. MI. Dodd,: You cannot make a comparison based on a transcript or someone's memory of a tape that had been destroyed, by your own testimony: Ms. Goodpasture. A better way to explain it would have been, probably, if this occurred, would have been to have 001279 ALDERSON RESORTING COMPANY, INC. NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 139 --- ## Page 140 1-138 2 3 20029 (202) 554-2315 300 ITH STREET, S.H: REPCRTERS BUILDING, MASHINOTON, 7 3 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 20 21 23 24 25 said that the transcriber who listened to both tapes said that it was the same person rather than using the term "voice comparison." Mr. Dodd. You sent out this memo. Let me refer you to page 67. Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, sir. Mr. Dodd.: Stack C. I am looking. at thiso newz story here.""o"" Can. I ask you, is that your handwriting on the bottom there? You see the documentation? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, sir. Mr. Dodd. Whose handwriting is that? Ms. Goodpasture. It is mine. Mr. Dodd. Read that for me. I can't read your hand- writing too well. What does that say? Ms. Goodpasture. It says the caller from the Cuban Embassy was unidentified until Headquarters sent traces on Oswald and voices compared by who is the Soviet translator. Mr. Dodd. When did you make that annotation? Ms. Goodpasture. When? MI. Dodd. Yes. Ms. Goodpasture. I do not know. Mr. Dodd. Approximately? Ms. Goodpasture. I would assume we made it some time 001280 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC HN 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 140 --- ## Page 141 1-139 2 • 3 after the date of this article. To answer your question. truthfully, I do not know. MI: Dodd..: Was it ten years ago, a year ago? Ms. Goodpasture. The date on this article was 21 October 554-2345 1964. 7 20024 10 300 7711 STREET. S.W REPORTERS BUILDING, 12 Mr. Dodd. Would you have done it right at the time that the article had come out? Ms: Goodpasture. I will tell you -- MI. Dodd. Unfortunately, we are going to have to break again for another vote and I am going to come back again in five minutes. In that five minutes, I want you to think very hard about when you made that annotation. I am going to ask you to give me an answer to that. I do not want to have to remind you here that you are sworn to tell the whole truth to this Committee and it is vitally important. Ms. Goodpasture. That is what I have been trying to 14 1$ 1ớ 17 18 19 20 21 do. 23 25 MI. Dodd. This is a very important matter. We will take a recess and come back in five minutes and I would like you to think about it during those five minutes, and then I would like you to give me your best answer to that question I just asked you. We will stand in recess. (A brief recess was taken.) 001281 NW 50955 DocId:32277224 Page 141 ALCERSON REFORTINO COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 142 1-140 REPORTERS NUILDING, CaSINHOTON. D.C. 2002% (202) 554-2345 5 7. 3 $ 10 12 13 14 15 300 OTH STREET. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 MI. Dodd. Picking up, Mrs. Goodpasture, where we left off at the time of the last break and you have had a few minutes to think over my question, I do not want you to think for one second that I am particularly being tough in any way. It is just that these are very, very important ques- tions and I would like you to answer you as honestly and as candidly as you can as to when you think you made that notation. Ms. Goodpasture. I think that I made the notation within about a week or ten days after the date of the newspaper article, because this was a Washington article and it would have been sent to us in Mexico through a pouch. Mr. Dodd. 1964? Ms. Goodpasture. I think it would have been some time towards the end of October, 1964. MI. Dodd. Did . I understand you correctly to respond to counsel's question, turning to page 22, that you were the releasing officer, authenticating officer - which was it on that memo? Did I hear your response to that correctly? Mr. Goldsmith. Were you the authenticating officer of this memo? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Dodd. You were the authenticating officer for that memo? Ms. Goodpasture. 001282 Cable. ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. HH 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page 142 --- ## Page 143 1-141 2 3 OTH STREET, s.l. REPORTERS BUILDING, WASNTNGTON, D.C. 20024 3 10 •-. 12 13 14 15 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 Mr. Dodd. Cable dated 23 November 1963? MS. Goodpasture. Yes, sir. MI. Dodd. I read to you again paragraph 2. "In view Oswald Soviet Union. In fact, he claimed on 1 October, the envoy" -- whatever that is - "to have visited the Soviet Embassy 28 September: Subject paragraph 1 probably Oswald. Station unable to compare voice as first tape erased prior second call." That is November, 1963 and in October of '64, "Voices compared by Which is true? Ms. Goodpasture. The notation was made in 1964 on this newspaper article. I think that I was referring to the trans- criber, Mr. Tarasoff's, identifying the man as having made both calls in listening to the tapes. Mi. Dodd. Why did you not make that same observation on 23. November 1963? Ms. Goodpasture. That was a mistake I made that I should not have made. I should have stated it exactly as it occurred so we would not be in doubt now. But I do not know. Mr. Dodd. So the statement made on 23 November '63 is inaccurate? Ms. Goodpasture. To the best of my knowledge, it is. I am sure I could not locate the tapes, or I would not have put that in the cable. Mr. ODodd. Thank you. 001283 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 143 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 144 1-142 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2345 7 REPORTERS RUTI.DING. MASHINGTON. 10 300 ITH STREET. 12 13 ! 15 15 17 18 19 20. 21 Counsel, you may proceed. MI. Goldsmith. Thank you. In this regard, I would like to refer to Stack B, the document, page 1 in Stack B, which is the transcript ofithe conversation in reference to Oswald. That is Stack B, page 1. This is a transcription of a conversation involving Oswald that took place on 1 October 1963. By the line which immediately follows the number 151 in brackets it says "the same person who phoned a day or so ago and spoke in broken Russian." Viewing this language in connection with page 67 of Stack C, that is the newspaper article that we were just referring to - Ms • Goodpasture. 67. MI. Goldsmith. Page 67, the newspaper article that we were just referring to. I direct your attention to the last paragraph of that article, the one that is marked off, specifically the one that is adjacent to your marginal nota- tion. 23 21 23 Would you please read that? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. Might it not be said that, viewing these two items together, the language in this paragraph and the statement in brackets, the same person who phoned a day of so ago and spoke broken Russian, that it was apparent that swald, 001284 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 144 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 145 1-143 2 3 5 ó 20024 (202) WaSHINGTON, 3 9 • 10 11 12 13 14 15 300 7TH STREET, = 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 in fact, had visited the Cuban Embassy earlier? Ms. Coodpasture: Would you repeat that again, please? Mr. Goldsmith. Viewing these two documents together, the last paragraph of the article, the language in brackets, it says, "The same person who phoned a day or so ago and spoke in broken Russian." Does it not become apparent that Oswald, in fact, had visited the Cuban Embassy earlier? I admit that is not a direct inference that can be drawn, but if you follow the transcripts, if you go back to the preceding Saturday and you review the transcripts from that day, it becomes apparent that Oswald had been at the Cuban Embassy on Saturday. The point that I am getting at is that independent of these documents here, it would seem that a voice comparison, in fact, would have to. have been made. Ms. Goodpasture. I think that he recognized the voice from having listened to a tape ofithe Cuban Embassy that had Russian on it but did not have a name, instead of just listening to two tapes. Mr. Goldsmith. Going back to page 22 of Stack C it says, "station unable to compare voice as first tape erased prior receipt second call." Does that suggest to you at at the time that this cable was sent the second tape wasastill in existence? It says one tape was destroyed or erased; the second one ias not. 001285 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 145 ALDERSON REFORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 146 1-144 2 3 S NAPORTERS NUEL.DTMG, VPSHINICTON, n. C. 20024 (202) 10 12 13 14 1 $ STREET. 7. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 Ms. Goodpasture. No, I think that it had been erased. Mr. Goldsmith. You say both have been erased? This says, "station unable to complete" - Ms. Goodpasture. The first tape - Mr. Goldsmith. Right. The first tape, according to this cable, had been erased. What about the second tape? Ms. Goodpasture. Pardon me? Mr. Goldsmith. What about the second tape?. There are two tapes we are talking about. Ms. Goodpasture. YOu said what about the second tape. Mr. Goldsmith. Yes, that is what I said. This seems to suggest that while the first tape had been erased, the second tape has not been erased. Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. Mr. Goldsmith. This cable is dated November 23, 1963. What happened to the tape that was in existence on November 23, 1963? Ms. Goodpasture. I do not think that it was still in existence in November, 1963 but I think that it still was in existence wien the tape from the second call cane back to us. But the first one, we discovered, had been erased. Mr. Goldsmith. This says, "station unable to compare voice as first tape erased prior receipt second call." Why does not the cable say instead -- Ms. Goodpasture. They both were erased. I do not know. 001286 ALDERSON REPORTINE COMPANY. INC. IW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 146 --- ## Page 147 1-145 2 20024 (202) 558-2345 5 3 300 GIl STREET. REFORTERS BUTIDING, LASHTNGTON, 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 23 ..24 25 Mr. Goldsmith. I recalled earlier that your testimony was that you looked for the tapes and that you could not find the first one. That also suggests that this second one, in fact, was found. Was the second tape found? Ms. Goodpasture. Would you repeat that, please? MI. Goldsmith. Your testimony earlier was that you looked for the tapes but you were unable to find the first tape. You did not say that you were unable to find either tape. You said that you were unable to find the first tape. i That, again, suggests that the second tape was found. Ms. Goodpasture. No, I do not think I was able to find any of the tapes that had Lee Oswald's calls on them. I found the original transcripts, but I could not find the tapes that had those calls. Mr. Goldsmith. The calls in question came in between September 27 and October 1, 1963, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. The first call? Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. Ms • Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. The first call came in, as it turns out, September 27th. The last call that was attributed to Oswald came in October Ist. So we have a timespan here of five or six days in which the calls came in, and your testimony is that the first tape was erased prior to the receipt of the 00128% NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 147 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 148 1-146 2 3 7T1 STREET. 5.W. REPORTERS BULLOG, NASHTUGTON, 20024 (202) 9 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 21 23 74 25 second call, yet earlier, you indicated that the normal time Lag was two weeks. Here we have a tape being erased well before the normal time lag. Do you have any explanation for that? Ms. Goodpasture. No. Mr. Goldsmith. Referring to page 28, Stack C, could you identify this document? Ms. Goodpasture.: It is a copy of the cable sent from Mexico to Washington, CIA Headquarters. Mr. Goldsmith. What is the date on it? Ms. Goodpasture. The date on it is 23 November 1963. Mr. Goldsmith. Directing your attention to paragraph 4 of this particular document, would you please read that? Ms. Goodpasture. who did transcrip- tion said Oswald is identical to person speaking broken Russian who called from Cuban Embassy 28 September to Soviet Embassy. And that, I think, was taken from the information in this transcript; B-1, line 151. Mr. Goldsmith. Your response then is that - l si Ms Goodpasture.iI think that was taken from this statement in the October 1 transcript, Mr. Goldsmith. At any time after the assassination of the President, did anyone go to Boris Tarasoff who is the person referred to, whose pseudonym was 001288 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 148 ALDERSON REPORTINO COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 149 1-147 2 3 HASHTNCION, n.C. 20024 (202) 5518-2345 5 3 10 ?! 12 13 at any time after the assassination did anyone go to Mr. Tarasoff and ask him whether the person speaking in these conversations was the same person? Ms. Goodpasture. I did not, but I did not see it. The person who saw him was Herb Minell and that was his case officer. The outside person for the electronic surveillance delivered tapes to me, but he did not •give them guidance or supervision. That was given to him by Mr. Minell, who would have been the one who would have gone to him and talked to him about this MI. Goldsmith. This paragraph number 4 seems to suggest, does it not, that was actually specifically asked whether Oswald was the same person appearing in each conversa- tion. 30 л ITI STREET, .W. REPORTERS 15 • 1' 17 18 19 20 ?? 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. It could be interpreted that way of it could also have been taken from this other transcript. MI. Goldsmith.: And finally, I would like you to compare the statement in paragraph 4 of this cable with paragraph 2 on page 22, (Pause) Paragraph 4 indicates that said that Oswald is identical with the person in paragraph 1 speaking broken Russian, yet the earlier cable on page 22, the second para- graph -- this is your cable - you report that the station was unable to compare the voices. Is there any way to resolve the 001289 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 149 --- ## Page 150 1-148 3 Э0n ITH STREET, s.H. REPORTERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON, n.C. 20024 (202) 554-2315 7 3 .10 12 13 15 inconsistency? Ms. Goodpasture, The only explanation is the one I made previously, is that the two tapes were still not available at that time to compare and we had to take the transcriber's word for it. Mr. Goldsmith. I would also like to point out that paragraph 2, the very last line, the first two words, it says "probably Oswald." Is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Page 22? Mr. Goldsmith. Page 22, the second paragraph, the last line, it says "probably Oswald." Ms Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. This cable is Mexico 7023. Then, two cables later, 7025, the fourth paragraph, it says who did transcriptions, says Oswald is identical. We no longer have any words of qualifica- tions. 17 18 20 71 22 24 23 I am referring now to page 29, paragraph 4. Ms. Goodpasture. What page is the other one? Mr. Goldsmith.: Page 29, paragraph 4. It says, who did transcription, says Oswald is identical. The earlier cable says, "probably Oswald. Unable to compare voice as first tape erased prior to receipt of the second." Two cables later, it says that says Oswald is identical with the person speaking broken Russian who called 001290 ALCERSON REPORTINO COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 150 --- ## Page 151 1-149 2 3 from the Cuban Embassy on September 28th. What happened between the time that Mexico 7023 was sent out and Mexico 7025 was sent out to account for this differ=. ence? (202) 554-2315 300 STREET, S.V. REPORTERS BUILDING. VASHINGTON, D. 3 10 !! 12 13 15 1T 19 20 23 23 Ms. Goodpasture.' The only explanation I can give is that we went over the files again and we found the references that the transcriber had made, the statements that he had made, that it was the same person. Oh, MI. Minell could have gone out and talked with him. In your interview with Mr. Minell, I am sure that he would remember if he did. Mr. Dodd. Let me interrupt for one second. Miss Goodpasture, at the time that you were sitting down and having discussions over these November 23 -- over this 23 November, 1963, when you were sitting down and comparing these two memorandum; was MI. Tarasoff ever present in the preparation of these memos? Ms.: Goodpasture. Did MI. Tarasoff ever -- Mx. Dodd. Was he present during the preparations of these memos and these discussions you were having? Ms. Goodpasture. You mean this one? MI. Dodd. I am talking about page 22, the memorandum on which you were the authorizing officer, the memorandum involving paragraph 4 on page 29 where that Oswald is identical. says 001291 NW 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 151 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. --- ## Page 152 1-150 Ms. Goodpasture. No, he was not present. MI. Dodd. He was not present for any of those discus- 3 sions? 30п ITH STREET. s.V. REPORTERS BULLDING, MASHINCTON, D. C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 3 $ 10 !! 12 13 • 1.5 17 18 19 ..20 23 24 23 Ms. Goodpasture. No. The reason was that he was located outside of the Embassy and these were not taken outside. Mr. Dodd. Did you ever personally speak to Mr. Tarasoff? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes, I have spoken to him personally. Mr. Dodd. Did you speak to him at the time? Ms. Goodpasture. No. I was not in touch with him at this time? MI. Dodd. Did you speak to him - how did you know he compared the voices? Ms • Goodpasture. Pardon me? MI: Dodd: How do you know he compared the voices if you did not speak to him? Ms • Goodpasture.: I took it from this transcript, I think, from a statement made here that he typed himself, the P 1-B is a copy of a transcript prepared by Tarasoff, on his typewriter. MI. Dodd. Let us suspend for a second. (Pause) Go ahead. Mr, Goldsmith. Probably you will not believe this. I only have a few more questions. 0n1202 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. NW 50955 DooId:32277224 Page 152 --- ## Page 153 1-151 2 3 554-2345 300 ITH STREET. S.V. REPORTERS BUTLDING. WASHINGTON, 12 13 15 18 1.9 20 21 1] 24 23 Turning to page 30 of the documents in Stack C, this is a duplicate of Mexico number 7025, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. MI. Goldsmith. This is the same cable that in paragraph 4 makes a reference to saying that Oswald is identi- cal with the person who spoke broken Russian involved in the Cuban Embassy on September 28th, is that correct? 'Ms. Goodpasture. Wait a minute, I am not following you, page 30? Mr. Goldsmith. Turn to page 30. That is a duplicate of 7025. That is the Mexico copy of 7025. Ms: Goodpasture. Mexico 7025, right. Mr. Goldsmith. This is your copy, the one that you referred to earlier? On page 28 and 29 was the copy that went to headquarters, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. We are talking about the same cable now. In each case, paragraph 4 makes the same reference to Oswald's being identical, et cetera, et cetera. Who was the authenticating officer, page 32, I believe. Ms. Goodpasture. I am. Mr. Goldsmith. Turning back to page 23, which refers to Mexico 7023,lwho is the authenticating officer of that cable? Ms. Goodpasture. I am. 001293 'ALDERSON REPORTIE COMPANY, INC. NN 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page 153 --- ## Page 154 1-152 2 3 20024 (202) 3 ITH STREET. S.W. REPORTERS AUILDING VASILICTON, 10 i2 13 14 15 17 18 .20 .?! 22 24 Mr. Goldsmith. Yet, in the first cable, you say "probably. Oswald. Station unable compare voice as first tape erased prior receipt second call.". And in the second cable you state, "Oswald is identical," without any lanquage of qualification. Ms. Goodpasture. I said that the transcriber said he was identical, right? Mr. Goldsmith. Did anything happen? Ms. Goodpasture, In the other one, we were unable to have the tapes for someone else to compare them, for other people to listen to them or to send them to headquarters for them tolisten to then, but we did have on record from this transcript that he had prepared that Tarasoff said that the calls were made by the same man. MI. Goldsmith. You have no explanation for why the Oswald tapes would have been erased within six days of their receipt by the Mexico City station as opposed to within the normal two-week period. Ms, Goodpasture. No, I cannot explain it. MI. Goldsmith. One final question. Have you discussed the testimony that you have given us today, have you discussed that with anyone prior to coming here today? Ms. Goodpasture. Have I discussed the testimony? MI. Goldsmith.: Have you discussed the nature of your testimony with anyone prior to your coming here today? 001294 ALDERSON REPORTING CEMPANY, INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 154 --- ## Page 155 1-153 2 3 20024 (202) 554-2345 5 7 10 '! 12 13 REPORTERS BUILDING. 15 17 JON ITH STREET, 20 21 23 24 25 Ms. Goodpasture. The only discussion I had was a confusion about my coming up, which I discussed when I arrived, and there was a misunderstanding of my being brought up here. Mr. Goldsmith. I am aware of that. Have you discussed the substance of your testimony with anybody, or what you thought would be your testimony with anyone? Ms. Goodpasture. No, I have not talked with anyone since I left here yesterday: Mr. Goldsmith. Since you left the Committee's offices yesterday, is that correct? Ms. Goodpasture. That is right. •I left your office yesterday. Mr. Goldsmith. I have nothing further.. Thank you very much Mr. Chairman? Mr. Dodd. MI. Preyer, do you have any questions? MI. Preyer: I have no further questions at this time. MI. Dodd. Mrs. Goodpasture, first of all, I would like to request of you that you leave your address or addresses with the Legislative Counsel of the CIA from time to time. so if we feel a need to get back in touch with you, we can contact them and they can locate you for us, If you would do that, I would appreciate it. 001295 NH 50955 DocId: 32217224 Page 155 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. --- ## Page 156 1-154 2 3 (202) 554-2345 5 ó 7 $ REPONTERS BUILDING, WASHINGTON, 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 Secondly, I want you to know that we are grateful to you for appearing before your Committee. You have been help ful and we are grateful to you for that.: I want to apologize to you if I seemed to be a little abrasive on that one point, which is that we are trying to get to the truth of this as quickly as we can. Under our rules of this Committee, we give each witness an opportunity at the conclusion of their testimony to take five minutes and sum up or add any additional information that you feel might be helpful to this Committee or to correct what you may feel are any inconsistencies or confusion over testimony that you have given this committee, and I will ask you now to take advantage, if you would so desire, of five minutes or so to make that summation. Ms, Goodpasture. The only thing that I could think of right now is that I feel that some of the papers here are probably out of context and still have some errors in them, and those errors that come up, I am sure they are human errors and there may be more of them. I know. in this one draft of background material, I just guessed at the dates when people were there as well as names, as well as much of the information about the situation in Mexico at that time, because it was to be used as a framework for trying to pull together the documents that would be needed to present a true picture of what the agency had in their 001296 ALESASON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. NH 50955 DocId: 32277224 Page 156 --- ## Page 157 1-155 2 3 2002* (202) 554-2345 5 ó 10 files or the situation that was there at that time. That is about all I car think of now. Mr. Dodd. Thank you. All right, Miss Goodpasture, you are excused as a witness. Again, on behalf of the Committee, I express my gratitude to you. Mr: Preyer. I want to congratulate you on your stamina Miss Goodpasture: Mr. Dodd. Unless there is any further business before this Subcommittee, we will stand in recess until further call of the Chair. (Whereupon, at 3:45 pim, the Subcommittee recessed to reconvene at the call of the chair.) 13 T4 5 OTIl STREET, 13 17 20 21 23 24 23 00129% ALDERSON REPORTING COMFANY, INC. HW 50955 DooId: 32277224 Page 157 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10234-10140.pdf
104-10234-10140
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
03/19/1966
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
JMWAVE
CABLE RE:BELIEVE POSSIBILITY CENSORSHIP AMTRUNK-19 MSGS 5 AND 6 (REF B) CLEARED UP IN REF C
3
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK64-51 : F9 : 1998.06.14.18:01:34:153115 :
3
## Page 1 104-10234-10140 CRAISIFY TO BILE NO, A-GIE TO FILE ND.. FILE AIDD ACT. TO DRANCH D DESTROY • 7660 Chic. *ED MESSAGE 50/55 SECRET PERSON/UNIT NOTIFIRO TOTAL COPIES REPROOUCTION PROMIBITED TC 18|C6-199 To 1:1- aLF: •i,12 (a38 D 1 VING ADVANCE CoAr Winless SAND COPY Duca Dioro Drusco 68680 ILE, VE DES, COPS, CILOA, COMMO I; FL, FUZ M SE CRST 193025Z DIR INFO MADR CITE WAVE 9706- TYPIC AMMOON MHAPRON AUTRUNK-19, COMMO REF A DIR 88648 19105076526 C WAVE 9657 GN7665 D HAVE 8471 (N35492) 1 BELIEVE POSSIBILITY CENSORSHIP AMTRUNK-19 MSGS 5 AND 5 (REF B) CLEARED UP IN REF 6 AND UFCA 24782, DATED 17 MAR 550 AS STATED REF 6, COMPARISON LAST 4 A -19 MSGS INDICATES CENSORSHIP ANY A-19 MSGS IMPROBABLE® 2. ALTHOUGH WAVE AWARE DATE LAST A-19 SW MSG (REF C) PREDATES AMLASH-1/AMTRUNK-10 ARREST, UFGA 24782 POINTS OUT INDEPENDENT LINK AMICE-14 FAMILY HAS GIVEN NO INDICATION AMTRUNK-19 IN ANY. DIFFICULTY WITH GOC. AMICE-14 AND AMTRUNK • 19 HAVE MANY MUTUAL RELATIVES INSIDE CUBA (SOME AS PRO-REGIME AS AMICE-14 AND AMTRUNK-11 ARE ANTI-) AND THESE RELATIVES KEEP A-14 AND OTHER COUSINS RESIDENT WAVE AREA POSTED THRU TELEPHONE CALLS AND LETTER CORRESPONDENCE. LAST TELECON ON 12 MAR SY A-1A COUSIN WAVE AREA INDICATES A-14 AIMLASH -1 SECRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHiNITED Corlead lager sus, shaunagrating rod ericanone Copy No --- ## Page 2 PAGE 2 VAVE 97OG SECRET SECZE MOTHER WHO NAMED DURING AMLASH-I TRIAL AS SAFEHOUSE AND IN 78526 PAgez ACCOMMODATION ADDRESS KEEPER STILL FREE FROM JAIL OR HARASSMENT. SINCE ORIGINAL NOTIFICATION AMTRUNK-11 ARREST CAME WAVE THRU THIS CHANNEL (REF D), BELIEVE THIS MEDIUM WAVE BEST ADVANCE INDICATOR ANY GOC MOVES AGAINST A -19. 3. AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY LCFLUTTER A-19 NEXT TRIP MADR TO RESOLVE A-19 MOTIVES AND CLEAR UP MINOR SW DEFICIENCIES. CONCUR MADR ACCOM ADDRESS WOULD BE QUICKER AND MORE SECURE. WOULD SUGGEST, HOWEVER, THAT A-I9 RETAIN WAVE ACCOM ADDRESS AS ALTERNATE MEANS COMMO. VIEW DEMONSTRATED A-19 GRASP SW TECHNIQUE, POSSIBLY ENCRYPTED SW WOULD ALSO CONTRIBUTE A-I9 SECURITY. 4O VIEW A-19 SW MSG & STATING CUBANA HAS DISCONTINUED PUBLISHING ADVANCE CREW SCHEDULE, ALTERNATE CHANNEL RE NOTIFICATION HIS NEXT TRIP MADR COULD BE INITIATED BY A-19 THRU COMMERCIAL CABLE USING METHOD DESCRIBED PARA 27, ATTACHHENT TO UFGA 23922, 38 NOV 65. WAVE ACCOM ADDRESS NOT •SET UP RECEIVE COMMERCIAL CABLES. 5. A-19 SW MSGS 6 AND S (DISSEMINATED IN UFG 8082 --- ## Page 3 PAGE 3 VAVE 970S SEE BET MS AND UFG 8048) TOUCH ON PARA 3F REF A RUMTS• 1N78526 Page 3 6. WAVE CONTINUING RESERVE OWVL SCHEDULE IN ANTICIPATION COMPLETING THIS COMMO LINK TO A-19. SECRET CFN 9706 AMTRUNK-19 88640 9442 9657 8471 19 5 6 B C UFGA 24782 17 66 C 4 A-19 A-19 A-19 SW C AMLASH-! AMTRUNK-10 UFGA 24782 AMICE 14 NO INDICATION 19 GOC 14 19 14 11 ANTI A-14 12 A-14 A-14 1 11 D GOC A-19 A-19 A-79 SW A-19 A-19 SV A-19 A-19 SW 8 A-19 27 UFGA 23922 30 65 NOT SET A-19 SW 6 8 UFG 8002 UFG 8048 3F A • A-19 BT NANN ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-10287-10426.pdf
124-10287-10426
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
09/30/1966
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
97-4474-314
DIRECTOR, FBI
SAC, MM
6
FBI
HQ
3/12/18
INC NOTE
null
## Page 1 124-10287-10426 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 6/4/2015 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER: 124-10287-10426 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 97-4474-314 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: SAC, MM TO: DIRECTOR, FBI TITLE: 'PAGES: PACTE: 9/30/1966 SUBJECTS: MIRR, OBA, COMANDOS L, BOMBING RAID, CUBA, NEWS ARTIC DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Secret RESTRICTIONS: 1A; 4 CURRENT STATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 06/26/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE, APPROVAL OF CIA COMMENTS : INC NOTE N4'50953 DooId:32305296 Page 1 19 --- ## Page 2 i.s. SECRET: TELETYPE UNIT SEP 3 0 1966 •Mr. Casper- Mr. Callahan... Mr. Conrad NR-- 30gt ENCODER MESSACE Mr. Felt Mr. Gala 3:48PM URGENT 9-22-66 GPS SEO RET Mr. Rogen CUNT Mr. SulliT Mr. Tav TO BIRECTOR SHICE RIVEP.! Sassifled by Beldon CIA HAS NO ChEt DECI ROAN TO FROM MIAMISADAr IMi CiA = 001 No pecas DADR 91583 OF CIFIPORMATION 55211324 WANt DOCUMENT FaR the BRAGn A DOU IMENTO TASTIERRE RECUPERACION REVO CIQUARTA PERR) SEC PAUFILE NINE SEVEN DASH FOUR FOUR SEVEN FOUR CUBA. place ce m 705-11712268-6) MIAMI HERALD ISSUE OF SEPT. THIRTY, NINETEEN SIXTYSIX, CONTAINS ARTICLE TO EFFECI THAT CUBAN ARMED FORCES MINSTRY ANNONCED THURSDAY, Spirit cil SEPT. TWENTYNINE, SIXTYSIX, THAT AN AIRPLANE, "APPARENTLY FROM THE UNITED STATES," ATTEMPTED BOMBING RAID ON THAT DAT ON NORTH COAST PORT OF NUEVITAS. NUEVITAS IS IN CAMAGUEY PROVINCE 23-9 SOME THREE HUNDRED FIFTY MILES EAST OF HAVANA DECLASSIFY CIV: 25% CLASSIFIED BY 5668 SLAS CREDIT FOR RAID ACCORDING TO NEWSPAPER ARTICLE, WAS TAKEN BLUFK) MIRR HEADED BY DR. ORLANDO BOSCH AVILA. MIRR' CLAIMED IT HAD BEEN AIDED BY MEMBERS OF ANOTHER: ANTI DARN CASTRO GROUP, COMANDOS L. ACCORDING TO NEWSPAPER, A COMMUNIQUE BROADCAST OVER RADIO CUBA SAID PLANE CAME FROM THE NORTH, DROPPED ONE BOMB INTENDED FOR A THERMO ELECTRIC PLANT. BOMB FELL FIVE HUNDRED METERS FROM TARGET. WITH NO A-115 MATERIAL DAMAGE OR CASUALTIESREC 97-4474-31 PLANE DROPPED TWO OTHER BOMBS AT NEARBY PUERTO TARAFA, INTENDED FOR WAREHOUSES BUT CHARMED BOMBS DID NOT EXPLODE • ARTICLE WENT ON TO STATE THAI LATE 3 AMONG DOT 1 19G THERES MOZACtUALL& 1966 THE ATTACK. # rimiento Insurrecional END PAGE ONE / MR. DELOACH FOR THE DIRECTOR RecupErAción SECRET' REVOLUCiOnAKiA CATRON E copy UNTEG HH 50953 DocId:32305296 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 Page 3 NH 50953 DocId: 32305296. 120 RECEIVED DIRECTRECO FBI DON INTELL DIV. RECO UP: 0AC$ 19. Hd 65 S DE da Der 1 12 53 04 966 N1O 7131N/ 81101 0.03Y NOS it. 99. WY 90 01. € DE dES jfe Me io g NOVA: 3: 1.034 FBI Classified by 5P6 BIT Declassity en: 0AD04/20/85 ALI INTOTNATION CONTAINES HEREIN IS USEGASSIFIED. FSCEPT MITE 3HOSN UTILERNISE 49, ill LE 30I230E.N0.101 Dcr RECU Le 12 41 PM 35F REC'O - SULLIVAN 1914" РОЖА + 311, 326 AFPEALE CIVIL ACT E. 0. 1182 D: T= 9/201 ITTES CCL (5-1) 6(040)(5) IS ARMS NOIM 0 038 I8 y Q0 SS ° 101. --- ## Page 4 SECRET CONX PAGE TWO SaptEmbER 077т 495-15 LON SEPT. THIRTY, SIXTYSIX, MM FOUR MINE TWO DASH'S ADVISED HE HAD MONITORED CUBAN RADIO STATION CMQ WHICH IN ITS FIVE THIRTY AM NEWS serenak BROADCAST ON SEPT. THIRTY, SIXTYSIX, ANNOUNCED THE BOMBING OF A SUGAR WAREHOUSE IN NUEVITAS. DESCRIBED BOMBING AS BEING MADE AT SEPtEMbER APPROXIMATELY ONE AM, ON IHURS. SEPT. TWENTYNINE, SIXTYSIX, BY A TWO MOTORED AIRCRAFT FLYING VERY LOW WITHOUT LIGHTS• AIRCRAFT DROPPED THREE BOMBS IN VICINITY OF THE PASTELILLO SUGAR WAREHOUSE IN NUEVITAS * U SEptEmbErE IIS SIX THIRTY AM BROADCAST ONLSERT. THIRTY, SIXTYSIR, MOU 531) 492 110(4) NINE FHE SAID CUBAN RADIO STATION REBELDE ANOUNCED THAT TWO CUSTOMS EMPOYESS GAVE FIRST HAND ACCOUNTS OF BOMBING INCIDENT. FIRST BOMB LANDED BETWEEN WAREHOUSES NUMBER SIX AND TEN BUT DID NOT EXPLODE• SECOND BOMB LANDED ON ROOF OF WAREHOUSE NUMBER TWO, FELL THROUGH THE CEILING, AND DISINTEGRATED WITHOUT EXPLODING. THE THIRD BOMB EXPLODED / AT THE PASTELILLO SUGAR WAREHOUSE. ONE BOMB CONTAINED THE FOLLOWING MARKINGS AND IDENTIFICATION/ "L DASH TEN DASH M THREE EIGHT DASH TWO ORTHIRTYTWO, JANUARY NINETEEN SIXTYSIX. I (PHONETIC). END PAGE TWO CONAKE TIAL SECRET HH 50953 DocId: 32305296 Page # --- ## Page 5 SECRET 139032 11 PAGE FOUR VERtEMbER SERT. THIRTY. SIXTYSIX CENTRICIA COMIC MANAGERAL WALLY DEL TORO, "USAFAD COVERT DIAMO ADVISED FLIGHT NOT SPONSORE EITHER OF THOSE AGENCIES THAT HAD NO INFO CONCERNING THIS MATTER BUT WOULD ATTEMPI TO ASCERTAIN ADDITIONAL INFO RE RAID. FEDERAl AViAtiUn Administration MIAMI HAS CONTACTED U.S. BORDER PATROL AND FAA AND NEITHER AGENCY HAS ANY INFO CONCERNING THIS FLIGHT OR IDENTITY OF AIRCRAFT IN ABSENCE OF MORE SPECIFIC INFO CONCERNING PLANE• MIAMI MAINTAINING CONTACT WITH LOGICAL SOURCES AND INFORMANIS AND OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES CONCERNING THIS MATTER• LECTErhEAD MEMORANDUM WILL SUBMIT LAM SUITABLE FOR DISSEMINATION AND WILL KEEP BUREAU ADVISED OF PERTINENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS MATTER. END is now FBI WASH DC Downs too por CLA INFO URI REMANIS GLASSIFEO 9883nda/ge 24,326 3/30/92 PeR menus a/ia/so 018. 98031dd/ge1 21132657192 (JF14) Xerox copies to : DE LOACH WANNALL NASCA MTIVAN. SECRET HH 50953 DocId: 32305296 Page 5 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32264272.pdf
180-10111-10367
04/26/2018
Redact
04/20/1977
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
015072
GENERAL MAGNIFICO
4
CITIZEN
2/7/18
Box #:291.
4
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 10/13/20 •AGENCY : HSCA RECORD NUMBER : 180-10111-10367 RECORD SERIES: NUMBERED FILES AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 015072 Document Information ORIGINATOR: CITIZEN FROM: GENERAL MAGNIFICO TO : TITLE : DATE : PAGES: SUBJECTS : 04/20/1977 4 GENERAL MAGNIFICO GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE DOCUMENT TYPE : LETTER CLASSIFICATION : Unclassified RESTRICTIONS : Open in Full CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 07/12/1993 OPENING CRITERIA : COMMENTS : Box #:291. v9.1 NW 55923 Doold:32264272 Fage 1 --- ## Page 2 2022 Offi pras 1a247a GENERAL SERVICEE ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL PERSONNEL RECOROS CENTER MILITARY PERCONNEL RECONDS," ALL POINTS BULLETIN Political kidnaping with intended murder an 20 DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL "WARNING AGAINST CLARENCE M. KELLEY; THE DOMESTIC BUREAU OP NAMED.ON THE BACK OF THIS PAGE INVESTIGATION AND THOSE CO-CONSPIRATORS BY THE STATES GRIFFIN ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED BELL. • WARNING TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY ARE CHARGED WITH VIOLATIONS OF CONCERN: CLARENCE M- KELLEY AND CO-CONSPIRATORS 18, UNITED STATES (CONSPIRACY), 1201 (KIDNAPING)", CODE, , SECTIONS 201 (BRIBERY: & GRAFT), 1001 (FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS) 351 CATIONS), 2311 (STOLEN PROPERTY), 2510 (WIRE INTERCEPTION & INTERCEPIION OF.TORAL *111 (ASSAULT), BURGLARY), 2231 (SEARCHES "&" SEIZURES); COMMUNI- 2071 (RECORDS & REPORTS), 2111 (ROBBERY & 1901 (PUBLIC OFFICERS 1751 (PRESIDENTIAL ASSASSINATIONS, KIDNAPING & ASSAULT). & EMPLOYEES), 1541 (PASSPORTS & VISAS);.: 1501 (OBSTRUCTION, 1581 REPYARES & WAVENY 1361 (MALICIOUS MISCHIEF)?"* 1341 (MAIL/ FRAUD) 3 1621 (PERJURY) OF JUSTICEL 1111 (HOMICIDE ); 871 (EXTORTION & THREATS). 641 (EMBEZZLEMENT & THEFT ) 591 (BLECTIONS & POLIVICAL 791 (ESPIONAGE & CENSORSHIP), 351 CONGRESSIONAL ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPING & ASSAULTI, ETC. ACTIVITIES), TO:ALI JUDGES, JUSTICES AND ALI TOSALI COURTS EMPLOYEES EVERYWHERE: 10: ALL EMPLOYEBS OF. BOTH HOUSES OF UNITED STATES CONGRESS; POLICE, ALL SHERIFFS, TO: ALL EMPLOYEES 1103 OF ALL LAW ENFORCING OFFICERS & AGENCIES EVERYUHERE: POST OFFICES & POSTAL ALL SERVICE; EMPLOYEES OF ALL MOTOR 1O: 10: ALL DOCTORS, PSYCHIATRISTS; VEHIGLE DEPTS IN ALL STATES: ALI "EMPLOYERS OF DOCTORS CHIEFS OF AND HOSPITALS: 456 ladd TO: ALI u.s. POLICE EVERYWHERE AND ALL DISTRICT ATTORNEYS; ATTORNEYS, u.s. TO: ALL TO: EMPLOYEES. OF ALL FEDERAL, MARSHALS AND EVERY STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; STATE, Aul. MAYORS, CITY COUNCILS AND THEIR EMPLOYEES, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL COURTS: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION; KOSLAUPATIS. AIRLINES, ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES, BUS LINES MARKETS, 15309 MERCHANDISE STORES, PIRE AIRPORT EMPLOYEES, BAKKS, SUPERIOR COURTS, MUNICIPAL COURTS, SUPREME COURT. OF COURTS, DEPTS: POST OFFICES, APPEAL'S THE SUPREME THE UNITED STATES, ALL COURTS STATE HOSPITALS, SHERIFPS PACILITIES, CITY COUNCILS, PRISONS, POLICE FACILITIES, WARNING LI MERA MAGNIFICO, THE DEPUTY PRESIDENT I UNICE TO COLAR FEMALE GENERAT INVIERNATIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE 122 VES MARINE, CORP: STNCE I ADICE: J/2041: COMMANDIRE CENTRAT OF THE PLOT TO KIDRAP GENE RAI:: MACH IPICO M. KELLEY THE DOMESTIC DIRECTOR OF INE, P.B.T. CLARBACE FOR AND WITH CERTAIN; KNOW; CONSPIRATORS (SEE BACK OF PAGE) BY USING ILLEGALLY AND UNLAWFULLY AND CRIMINALLY THE FACILITIES AND PERSONNEL OF FIELD OFFICES. THE PEDERAL BÚREAU OF INVEST ICATTON 1Y40EAO 7052 6027943 CLARENCE M. KELLEY -PRI, NICHOLAS P. CALLAHAN THOMAS J JENKINS- JAMES B. ADAMS - EUGENE WALSH MADNEW J. 130. DONALD. DECKER W. - MOORE, 973E3 JOHN JO'MCDERMOTT JR. GALLACHER HAROLD BASSETT .W. RAYMOND WANNALI COCHRAN ,JR * 20 JOHN AB MINTZ HERBERT E. HOXIF IWM.V. CLEVELAND WM M.. -MOONEY JOHN W. WM C. SULLIVAN JOHN P. POTATO, BULLTIN, ON MAY FIRS MOHR 1977, THE KIDAPINO PLOT IS PLANNID TO PARE PIACE UFON TRB' ARRIVNI OF GEMIRAI THOMAS E. BISHOP ROBERT F. GE BHARDT SACH RICO ON TA AIRLINES PROM AT Z0D0 P.M LOS ANILES AT TRE AIRPORT IN ST. LOUIS, JOSEPH J. BF. EX RENTED. AT A RIOGED: PLANTED: AUTO, PROM CASPER LOUIS, THE NATIONAL' CAR RENTAI. IVAN W. MISSOURDENHICH, IS TO AGINCY HAS - TAKF GENERAI MAGNIFICO AWAY WASON G. CAMPBELL PROP THE AIRPORT TO THE: PLACE-WHERE "SHEIS TO BE KIDNAPED' AND LATER KILLED ROBT RUSS PRANCK AREA.WHERE THE, CRIME- IS-PLANNED- NO: "X PERT A COSE GARUD SECRET A TAL ATTORNEY CREEL OF TINED.50 MARK FELT "GALE"" AND FIVERY PERSON INVOLVED IN THE CONSPIRACY IS BEING CLOSELY WATCHED BY F.B.I. ALEX ROSEN AGENTS WHO ARE WORKING DIRECTLY UNDER THE ATTÓRNEY GENERAL AND ARE ORDERED TO CHAS D. BRENNAN GO OVER THE HEAD OF CLARENCE M. wM.S.' KELLEY AND THOSE IN HIS OFFICE. NANTAL THE ATTORNEY, GENERAL: OF. THE UNITED ETATES GRIPPIN BELL MAKES THIS REPEATPI LEONARD M. WALTERS ARMING TO ALI 50P N09 •FLETCHER: D.") THOMPSON OPFICER ON ACTIVE ... HELEN GANDY THIS IS A FINAL WARNING FOR ALI JACOBSON FUNNEX OR SUYTER TRE: CONSEQUENCES AS STAIRD ABOVE IN FAN WARNINGS 4ECCO CERNARD S. MILLER 10 AID AND ABET CLARENCE KELLEY AND HIS COLLASORATORS ANY FURTHER HILL CAUSE BRIGGS S. WHITE ALL CHARGES NAMED HEREIN TO BE PLACED AGAIRST THOSE PERSONS WHO DO NOT HEED RICHARD J. THOMAS J. BAKER BITS WARNING IN THIS CONSPIRACY OR ANY LEON JENKINS WESLEY GRAPP NW. 55923 DocId: 32264272 - Fage 2 NAMES OP OF THE THOSE UNDER INVESTIGATION, BY THE ATTORNEY EMERAI FOR CRIMES UNITED STATES GRIPPIN BELI: &-THE CONGRESS OF U.S. ON OFLAY E SIDE OF PAG: RICHARO, M. NiXON. THOMAS L. CORDIN, JERRORE S. GRANT, ALLEN MILLER. :DR. JOHN SHERMAN COOPER, OLIVER, THRUSTOS MORTON 'BERLINER, DR. HAMMETT, GORE, DOCTORS.OF WESTHOOD PRIVATE. DR DOROTRY Lades: •BARRINGTON.. PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL PROTEM JOAN .. LA:", JUDGE LEOPOLDO DR. CARNEY, DR. RONALD SANCHEZ, JUDA!. SEYMOUR POLLACHI MARKMAN; DR. DR. ALVIN DAVIS, ROOF. WILFRED- ROOF, .:3401 HARVEX MCKEE. ROOP MAMIE EISENHOWER, KOENAKE, BETTY PORD, GERALD R. KENNEDY ONASSIS, LADY BIRD JOHNSON, JACKIE MARGARET M.K. MARLOWE HALDEMAN, JOHN EHRLICKMAN, TRUMAN DANIELS, PAT NIXON, JOHN • CHARLES COLSON, & SONS JOHN, FAMILY, DEWEY, GENE, JAMES & MARK V:. MARTIN STILL, DONALD DAWSON, RAY, LAVINIA (MRS. i Statu TOM JAMES -STEWARI, ATTY.. CHAS S. LEEDS, --- ## Page 3 CLERK® UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POST OFFICE BOX 2201 WICHITA: KANSAS 67201 OFFICIAL BUSINESSE PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300 Bi MAGNIFICO 151 BoX 11998. RECEIVED GENERAL p.o- HER sePt. FROm A.M. 8:0° -p M SEP 20 1978 Post Office Box: 151 Firestone Station South Gate, California 90280 ARTHUR G. JONNSON CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OFFICE OF THE CLERK DiSTRICT OF KANSAS Wichi tas Kansas September 20, 1978 Mr. James P. Buchele United States Attorney Post Office Box: 1537 Topeka, Kansas 66601 Dear Mr. Buchele: I enclose an unopened letter delivered to our office As which was addressed to "The Federal Grand Jury, United States F2a Government, Wichita, Kansas." Viu Since your office handles grand jury matters inthe District of Kansas. Lam forwarding it to you for whatever attention you deem necessary. Very truly yours, ARTHUR G. JOHNSONG CLE CaroliNe cus By: Carotyn J. Brown, Deputy cresaco: sP.0. Box 151 Firestone Station South Gate, California 90280 SNOIL HISSESSY NO SALINHOO 127278 ASOOH ST 81. 6W 01 100 8151 09A15078 WW 55p23. DocId: 32264272 Pagé-3i POST ZRL80RRO) SAILERERO AA COLA --- ## Page 4 FEDERAL GRAND JURY INUESTIGATION WARNING Offo NoTE UNDER FEDERAL LAW THERE: IS IN STATUTE OF LIMOTATOONOF V CONSPIRACY TIME FOR GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROSECUTION OF NATIONAL PERSONNEL RECORDS CENTUR CONSPIRACY TANTANY PINE ONNEL RECCRDOI ALL POINTS BULLETIN C political kidnaping with intended murder RAINST CLARENCE M. KELLEY, INVESTIGATION AND THOSE CO-COUSPIRATORS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE AND ALREADY ATTEMPTED MURDER WARNING TO WROMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN: OF GENERAL ANE CHARGED WITH. UIOLANTONS KELLEY AND CO-CONSPIRATORS (CONSPIRACY): 1201 (KIDNAPING), MAGNIFICO 1001 (FRAUD AND FALSE 201 (BRIBERY & GRAFT), STATEMENTS), CATIONS), 2311 (STOLEN PROPERTY), 2510 (WIRE INTERCEPTION & INTERCEPTION OF 111 (ASSAULT), ORAL COMMUNI- BURGLARY), 2231 (SEARCHES & SEIZURES), 2111 (ROBBERY & FEMALE COMMAMDINE 2071 (RECORDS & REPORTS), 1751 (PRESIDENTIAL ASSAISINATIONS, KIDNAPING & ASSAULT), 1901 (PUBLIC OFFICERS & EMPLOVEES), GENERAL U.S,M. 1621 (PERJURY), SINCE - 1-19x1 1541 (PASSPORTS & VISAS), 1501 (OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE) ALSO 1111 (HOMICIDE ), 1361 (MALICIOUS MISCHIRE), 1341 (MAIL 871 (EXTORTION rMaur.. 641 (EMBEZZLEMENT & TIETY), SI THREATS), 791 (ESPIONAGE & CENSORSHIP). 351 CONGRESSIONAL ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPING 591 (PECTIONS & POLISICAL ACTIVITIES), & ASSAULT) ETC. U.S. SECRET -5-1938 SERVICE TO: ALL JUDGES, TO SALI JUSTICES AND ALL, COUNTS EMPLOYEES EVERYWHERE: EMPLOYEBS OY EUTH HOUSES OF UNITED Trouser STATES CONGRESS: THE INTERNATIONAL TO: ALL ALL SHERIPPS, ALL LAN ENPORCING OFFICERS TO: ALI & AGENCIPS EVERSTIERE: ALL POST. OFFICES & POSTAL ALL EMPLOYEES OF ALL MOTOR DEPY3 SERVICE: DIRELTOR OF THE IN ALL STATES: DOCTORS, PSYCHIATRISTS. EMPLOVEES OF DOCTORS AND BOSPITALS: FEDERAL BUREAU CHIEFS OF. POLICE unher park U.s. ATTORNEYS, ALTD ALL DISTRICT ATTORNEYS: 101 EMPLOYEES OF ALL FEDERAL, U.S. HARJIALS ABID EVERY STATES APPOINEY GENERAL: 0F STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL SING-20 APRIL In GATes COUrt'g: MAYORS, CITY COUNCILS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, TEZIR EMPLOYEES, ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES, AIRLINES, BUS LINES RESTAURANTS, MArNeTS, FERCHANDISE STORES, AIRPORT EMPLOYEES, FIRE SUPERIOR COURNe. MUNICIPAL Counts, DEPTS:, POST OFFICES, APPRALS COURTS THE nur drur COURTS CoUnT OF THE UNITSD STATIC. ALL SOPHEME CITY HOSPITALS, SHERIFF'S PACILITIES. COUNCILS, PRISONS, POLICE NAVY ESTABLISHMENTS, AUTOYOBILE FACILITIES, MILITARY JAILS, INSURANCE. COMPANIES, BROKERS, TRUMANNE DIESELITY ADE DUSTINEN WAKWING 11 STAYS GRISEN ENLI AND U.5. REAVENS DE SUSPICE 20 KTOMAP PEMALE MERA MAGNIFICO, THE DEPUTY PRESIDINT 7717100& INTERLATIONAL, DIRECILL OR ME TEN MORE MARTEE CORNS BYECT IS BICH 1241 CONNE STA 24/28514 Veg ACT OURVICE BACK „NAL PLOY TO KIOSAF GPRETAL 116/100, M. KELLEY i CONSPIRATORS (SSE NIC DOVESTIC DIRECTOR OF TE P.B.I. MACHTYICO IS LAMME SPCAN-INADED BY CLAPLUCE BACK OF PAGE) FOR AND WITH CERTAIN IRONY 6OU CRIMINAILY THE BX USING ILLEGALLY AND UNLAUFULLY AND FACILITIES AID PERSONALL, OF THE FEDERAL ANU AL 119 FIELD OFFICES. BUREAU OP INVESTIRATION IE. ATTORNEX GENERAL AND CLARIUEL ME NELLEY IS NON UNDER INVESTIGATIO BY TALIVES. THE UNIZAD ACADES PALATE A62 U.S. HOUSE OF RETENORE 38 BOY SON 1043 DAXE AFTER NON THE ISSUANCE 86S0S ARN BINOR ISSUANCE 1977, THE KIDDING FLOT IS MAGERICO ON ERA AIRLIKES FROM LOS PESTLED AR WILL AIRFORT VRACE UPON TIE ARRIVAI, O2 GENERAL AT 201O p.M. A RIGGED. In 8T. LOUIS, DO.. PLANTED AUTO PROM BREN RENTED AT ST. THIr. NATIONAL CAR ReNTAI. LOUIS, MISSOURIANNACH IS TAKE. GENERAL AGINCY HAS - PROF, THE AIRFORT TO THE MAGNIPICO AWAY WHERE "BY ACCIDENT" AFTER BEING DRUGGED. SHE. IS TO BE KIDNAPED AND LATER KILLED THE AREA WHERE THE TAKE PLACE CRINE •IS PLANNED TO AND FIVERY PERSON INVOLVED IS A CLOSELY GUARDED SECTAT BY THE ATTORNEY GERERAL OF THE U.S. CONSPIRACY WHO ARE IS BEING CLOSELY WATCHED BY F.B.I. GO OVER THE HEAD OF WORKING DIRECTLY UNDER THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND ARE ORDERED TO CLARENCE KELLEY AND THOSE IN HIS OFFICE. TO. ALL CONCERNED: GENERAL PLENIPICO 1S A DUIX AND IS VITAL, TO THE DEFENSE OP 214Z UNITED MOPICER ON ACTIVE STATES. SHE CANNOT DE REPLACED. HIS IS A FINAL WARNING FOR ALL CONSPTRATONS NUCLULD 10 CHASE AND DESTST WINK OR SUITER IN CONSAQUENCKS AS RYALED MOVE TN TV. VARIE. 10 AID AND ABST CLARENCE ALL CHARGES NAMED HEREIN 70 BE PLACED FELLEY AND HIS CORSAENRAXORS APY PURTHER HILL CAUSE THI& WAINING IN THIS CONSTRACY; IS NADE NON GIN: CLARENCE Mi. KELLEY NICHOLAS P.I CATTAMAN. • TOMAS Ji JENKINS: JAMES B. ADAMS EUGENT W."WAI,SH 'DECKER" INNALD WI MOORE. : JR. McDERMOTT RICHARD J. GALLACHER. RICHARD H. ASH narone w. BASSETT RAYMOND WANNALI JAY COCHRAN JOHN A. MINTZ HERSERT E. wMV. CLEVELAND #M M. MOONEY Monk. MARSHALL WM C. SULLIVAN THOMAS E. BISHOP CC SHART CASPER AYAN W WASON G. CAMPBELL ROBT RUSS FRANCK MARK FELT" JAMES H. GALE: ALEX ROSEN CHAS D. BRENHAN LEONARD M. WALTERS FLETCHER D. THOHPSON HELEN GANDY 1Adr49r EDWARD SO MILLER BRIGGS S. RICHARD J. BAKER THOMAS J. JENKINS WESLEY GRAPP SOCIAL SECURITY #OF GENERAL MAGNIFICO IS JEK Act 6 (3) SHEr WAS BORNIN UNION COUNTY KENTUCKY ON SUNDAY, JULY 4, 1920 NAMES OF THOSE UNDER. THE UNITED INVESTIGATION BY SIS ATTORY CLAPRAI STATES GRIPPIN BELL & HE CONCREAS Or U.B. RICHARD DOKALD W. GRANT, COUTH, JERROLE S. OLTVER. JUDGE ALLEN MILLER, JOHN SHERMAN COOPER, THRUSTUS -DR. HAMME. TS. MORTOn, BERLINER, DR. CORE. OR DOROFITY 2412.5. DOCTORS O? WESTWOOD PRIVATE PSYCHIATRIC HOLITAL PROTEM JOAN BARRINGTON, IN. LA. "JUDGE LEOPOLDO SANCHEZ, JUDY CARNEY-DR. Un.- SE IMOOR POLLACE. RONALD MARIMAN, DR. SKERDLA, SHEN ROOF, DR. AL,VIN DAVIS. HARVEY MCKPE, DUZOIN MAMIE EISENHOWER: WILFRED ROOT, WALDA ROUP KOENBRE, GERALD REPOND, BETTY PORD LADY BIRD JOHNSON. JACKIE KENNEDY ONASSIS, MARGARET TRUMAN DANIELS. PAT DIXONEYOHN! MITCHELL. H.R: HALDMAN, JOHN CARLICHMAN: CHARLES OULSON, PAMILY. MARLOVE & SONS JOHN, GENE, JAMES & MARK V. HARTING DENEY:, ROY H.. LAVINIA(ARS. TOY STILL, DONALD DAWSON, JAMES STRUART, ATTY. CHASIS, LEADSI STILL) 707 NW. 55923 DocId: 32264272 Page --- ## Page 5 CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POST OFFICE BOX 2201 WICHITA. KANSAS 67201 OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300 MAGNITICO 15' 1918 RECeIVED GENERAL P.o. HER SEPT. 22, FROM 8:00 A. PM SEP 20 1978 P307404AK UNTHE STAT Post Office Box 15i Firestone Station South Gate, California 90280 ARTHUR G. JOHNSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OFFICE OF THE CLERK DISTRICT. OF KANSAS Wichita, Kansas NOTE: September 20, 1978 REGARDING CONSPIRACY AIDNAPING WITH ATTEMPTED AND INTENDED MURDER OR GENERAL M. MAGNIFICO, FEMALE FEDERAL OFFICER ON DUTY. SEE BACK OF PAGE Mre James P. Buchele United States Attorney Post Office Box 1537 Topeka, Kansas 66601 Dear Mr. Buchele: I enclose an unopened letter delivered to our office which was addressed to "The Federal Grand Jury, United States Government, Wichita, Kansas." Since your office handles grand jury matters in the District of Kansas, I am forwarding it to you for whatever attention you deem necessary. Very truly yours, ARTHUR G. JOHNSON, CLERK Carolin roun By: Carolyn J. Brown, Deputy CC: P.0. Box 151 - Firestone Station South Gate, California 90280 TEL# OF GENERHE MAGNiFICO IS 2/3 569-8067 3177 LIBERTY BLUA SOUTH GATE CALIR NW 55923 •DocId: 32264272 Page ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10066-10253.pdf
104-10066-10253
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
11/28/1978
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
SLANK
OPERATIONAL INFO
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK11 : F6 : 20031216-1025936 :
1
## Page 1 104-10066-10253 02/37/ ADV LA 1735Z SECRET PRECEDENCE FRP: 020 STAFF ACTION: C/LA-8 (735) INFO: ODPD-DO VRO FILE DO-HO CICIA, C/EPS/EG 2 C/OG/DMS, C/PES, C/POS/LOO, CAPCSAPGLA OLGA (25/W) 78 1625449 TOR! PAGE 001 2816394 NOV 78 IN 1625449 129187 SECRET 2816327 NOV 78 STAFF CITE 29167 TO: PRIORITY DIRECTOR. WNINTEL RYBAT SLANK REFS: A. - B C D. DIRECTOR DIRECTOR _ 266967 28716 28719 333233 PACHANKIS ADVISES THAT HE MAS NEITHER SEEN NOR HEARD FROM SLANK-I (SO1) SINCE EVENTS OF REFS B AND CO PER PARA 2O REF DO PACHANKIS WILL CHECK WITH SOME OF MIS CONTACTS RE WHEREABOUTS OF SOL. WILL ADVISE RESULTS SOONEST. 3. FILE: 20107496510 EZ IMPDET END OF MESSAGE SECRET 95646 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10120-10379.pdf
104-10120-10379
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
2/9/61
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CHIEF, SR DIVISION
ACTING DIRECTOR OF SECURITY
BASIC PROPOSAL TO COVER FIELD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL (REDSKIN AGENT CANDIDATES.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK43 : F24A : 1994.03.31.17:40:27:840028 :
1
## Page 1 104-10120-10379 DAD. tal 9746. 294S0TИ ATUETTIEHT 2. Board laborne, terry Clos Ronna 2032 R Dad 141n doting trutor of Sorty 1 Formans tarbal 1aes Daises #90682 clareres la soda to 14o tonorantan In tro Depray chiat, ca ariston for Me Mief, Contrl Cony Foy, Cle on the 108115 106 35 0: 33/20- As sall la noted, to nouri gose cascuared in th refereed 11ma10a5 lebruace merpended tut arter 1t has been veteriest that te sure ador sins perchologist os as as lore bees creati arested ta the long fu in alteratins at cog sagueted bat ids smescat be socospliobed ky jone cista roppescat themsins und be broceris badimhored sa: true man sith the I0700476 506e this agesego It would also area, that thia entressies sens Tention coes l rat - * C"$ 1S/:3 KUHNK§/ewd (2-8-61) CLOSED PREVIOUSLY ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-10264-10203.pdf
124-10264-10203
04/26/2018
Redact
00/00/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
62-116395-713 THRU 724
null
HQ
3/12/18
Review PDF 62-HQ-116395 652 thru 724 pages: 33-34
null
## Page 1 124-10264-10203 Assistant Actorney General subl Crininal Division Attention: lit, Paul loucher Director, FDI 62-116395- September 4g 1975 1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall 1 - MI. W. O. Gregar 1 - Mr. J, P. Lee MAIL, INTERCEPT PROGRANS Felorence is made to your monoranda of July 22 and August 13, 1975, and to our menorandus of August 20, 1975. This vill' confiri the fact that on Auguat 22, 1975, Ix, Paul Loucher of your Division reviewad docunenta In possession of the Federal bureau of Investigation. Headquarters (FBIHQ) pertaining to the nail intercept progradl NI. Boucher was furnished vich copies of appropriate docuents fron that file. A revlaw has been comploted of documents in the possession of FBIll concerning two prograns of mail inter ception operated by the Ill. In accordance with your requests these documents are nor available for review. It is requested that you contact Special Agent Janes I. Lee on extension 4562 at IBIHQ to arrange for a review of these Digit ORIGINAL. FINED IY 105-288406 - 62-116395 (Senstudy 75) MiLieng (7) "LLINFORMAT"": CONTAINED :.12D EXCEPT. WHERE SHOWN DIMERWISE. DUPLICATE YELLOW SEE NOTE PAGE TWO 1:00.00 ADIY SPQALM/PN DECLASSIFY ON: 25X MDR-16 NOONE I 570CT 1 1975 --- ## Page 2 Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division Re: Mail Intercept Programs SECRET NOTE: The Griminal Division has requested all memoranda, records, letters and othet correspondence from 1951 to date which the FBI had received or generated with respect to its participation by the i'Bl in mail intercept programs. the letter of 8/13/75 from the Criminal Division also asked for all infor- mation relative to the inception, implementation, justification, and highest level of authorization for institution of any mil Intercept (opening) programs either independently or with the assistance or approval of the Postal Service or any other Federal agency fron the period 1940 to present. That letter requested that we advise ir. Edward Fenig or Ronald Malone, Division attorneys, when this information is available. This notification is being furnished by letter to the attention of Mr. Paul Boucher since he is the Departmental attorney vho received information on the Project Hunter program and is the individual interested in obtaining inforuation concerning our progran. The information referred to in this letter concers .. the San Survey and Gus Survay and ve still have six more progzamscabout which to lurnish infornation to the Departuent 2 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32324522.pdf
124-90029-10014
04/26/2018
Redact
1/4/54
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
100-405298-NR
USA
1
ARMY
02/25/2018
EXCERPT;
1
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 6/8/2015 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER: 124-90029-10014 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 100-405298-NR Released under the John ?. Kennedy Issassination Records Collection Aet. of 1992 144 USc 2107 Note!. Case# :WH 45907 Date: 04-11-2018 Document Information ORIGINATOR: ARMY FROM: USA TO : TITLE : DATE: 01/04/1954 PAGES: SUBJECTS : THOMAS PEASNER THOMAS R. PEASNER DOCUMENT TYPE : CLASSIFICATION: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT Unclassified RESTRICTIONS : 3 CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 08/20/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF USA COMMENTS: EXCERPT; v9.1 HH 45907 DocId: 32324522 Page 1 --- ## Page 2 CONFO ENTIN SECURITY INFORMATION EXCERPT Enu NAME RANK ASN DOSSIER. No. ARMY AREA JEK Act 6(3). Sgt. during an interrogation on 31 August 1953, stated that (hearsay) studied Conmunism prior to his capture. voluntarily made recordings for which he was paid with Chinese money. Sceiven + ALL FBI INFORNAMIONU CONTRUNED PATE /1-15-94/y MAC /KSR JFK) 405588 DECLASSIFIED BY HRMY Des i 4.: 21-98 100 SLOPKER 8-4.98 (JFK) CAR LE, D0F2 JAM 1 $ 1957 CONFIDENTIAL SECURITY IMFORMATION HH 45907 DooId: 32324522 Page 2 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10172-10155.pdf
104-10172-10155
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
06/20/1962
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
INFORMATION REPORT INCREASE OF SABOTAGE IN CUBA.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-8 : F20 : 20040302-1052731 :
1
## Page 1 104-10172-10155 KNFORMA TIOt REPORT. INFOrM ON. REPORT CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY COUNTRY SUBJECT Cuba Inorease of Sabotage in Cuba S-E-C-R-E-T NOFORN /CONTINUED CONTADS. REPORT NO. C5-3/5246,4621 DATE DISTR. 20 June 1962 NO. PAGES 1 REFERENCES RD DATE OF INFO. PLACE & DATE ACQ Hid May 1962 England, London ( June 1962) T141S 18 UNEVALUATED FELD REPORT NO. INFORHATION SOURCE GRADINOS ARE DEPINITIYE APPRAISAL OF CONTENT IS TENTATIVE SOURCE from "a rogular source, quoting Jovan Mirio, sorTesponden: in Cuba of TANJO, IugosleY press agenoy. Appratsal of Content: 3e Tho militla is no longer regarded by the Cuban Goverment as a sorious faotor in internal or external defense. Instead, it 18 used as a recruiting ground for the Armed Foroes, which are now thoroughly professional and well-trained. 2. Armed clashes between opposition groups and goverment forces have occurred In several provinoes, Inaluding Matanzas,. Canaguey, and PInar del AlO. 3. There has been a notable increase in sabotage since February or March 1962. Buildings and fastories have been blown up or burned, cane fiolds set on fire, and above all, passive reistance has grown in certain industries, espoolally the sugar refining industry. A different pattern of sabotage has emerged. Instead of setting off explosive or incendiary bombs ihare they night cause loss of life or injury, thus arousing popular resentment against the opposition, targets are chosen for the maximum financtal damage or dislocation. S-E-C-R-E-T NOEORY/CONTINUED CONTROL LEINSA 1I 100 stea 020 STATE F I /ARHY I NAVY FOPCINCLANT CINCARIB # (Moros Moshtagon dutribution indicated by "1", Pall distriberton by "$=) 18L DIA IX FBI INFORMATION REPORT 12/L5 LEHR 1/ TEA THE 2/ JFW/SI 1s/6 164/ EXEC 2 TEN/MAD: IS DIAR 2/ W1/GA/PROP 2, 1M/PACY LE/R 1INPA-PI2D:21 POrALE DISSEN SEC 1, IE 2, CI 2, FI 3, lE 3 (2), IN 1 (1), kH 4 (1). INCORMATION REPORT 0F1-32,015 NO PROJECT (SMOTH) CS-3/511,421 DOORDINATING RELEASIN 61a1800 C RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10218-10106.pdf
104-10218-10106
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
01/01/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
LICOOKY-1 PRQ PART II (ILLEGIBLE)
7
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-53 : F20 : 1998.05.28.12:32:12:513082 : WHITE BANDED AS ILLEGIBLE, (NBR )
7
## Page 1 104-10218-10106 ThI» iy. part lacoble Thores cop Dada Fill for item, use 8. CRYPTONTA SECRET PRO NO. PERSONAL RECORD QUESTIONNAIRE PART 11 - OPERATIONAL INFORMATION DISPATCH AO. INSYRUCTIONS TO CASE OFFICER offaero of appropriato authorily or tha bases of lAe DOSE AFAIDABlO IN. on approval unloss requester approval say furnishes be obtained OrRUOTE complyine MARA RhO ap. 128 and 12d. Therealer sho usual nothos document or €aM. FR subject's hondarisine, al possibled and too 68) com. TIMED. in 800 13) ropies number. urete "NA. 8f additional space repuired PSEUDONYM SECTION CONTACT AND DEVELOPMEMT INDICATE HON. WHER, EMERE, ANY, AND BY ANCH SUBJECT NAS FIRST CONTACTED OR DEVELOPED. I 814199700 INDICATE METHER SUBJECT GOLIO DE TURNSO OVER QUICKLY AND IN A SECURE MANNED TO DUE REISDASIBLE CASE DEFICER SOP HANDLING. INDICATE nowhow. .... :?!= 111090.uü + 59.80010 clini. ..... "weater: LIST OTHER CASE OFFICERS DEEN KNOON. .!?. 181d WHO MAVE HANDLED SUQJECT OR ANON ME ANONS OR MAS I VOWN, GIVE NAMES BE ANICH THEY HAVE ...: chron 2: 12"0 that? 11ia" 11 6271606 dete doi trase the recest, to car headlar de 3131. ised F0Rм 1050a 3-99 T6-208 : SECRET Mislaint needle --- ## Page 2 1d-0d0d SECRET SECTION 1 MOTIYATION AND CONTPOL 1. ESTIMATE SUBJECT-S MOTIVATION, (BO detallod, of ponsablo cito exidence. Do eat ude siock cosmont auch do Gontunada. INDICATE WHAT CONTAOL. IF ANY. EXISTS OVER THE SUBJECT. (Al nO of reol control SECTION COVER 1. COVER USED BY SUBJECT AND CASE OFFICER IN THEIR MEETINGS. 2. COVER USED BY SUBJECT IN OBTAINING HIS INFORMATION AND IN CONTACTING HIS INFORMANIS. INDICATE SERVICE FOR #MICH SUBJECT THINKS NE (Will orky (ls auriend). SECTION IV INTELLIGENCE CORNECTIONS AND TRAINING EXPLAIA SUBJECT'S KOONN PAST OR PRESENT CONNECTION "ITH ANY OTHEA INTELLIGEACE SERVICE, INUILAIF THE EXTENT SUCH CONNECTION IS KNOWN OVERTLY. EXPLAIN ANY TRAINING SUBJECT HAS HAD IN CLANDESTINE OPERATIONS. !!!" trig SECTION V COLLABORATION POTENTIAL INDICATE OTHER FOREIGE POMER SUBJECT ADULO BE MOST LIKELY TO COLLABORATE WITH BECAUSE OF HIS BOLDLOGY OR PAST ASSOCIATIONS. EXPLAIN. :::;" it coolestle: c it contrad. 00! 10. 202.00 fire tan Grind. SECRET --- ## Page 3 14-00000 : ContInued Section II. 1. 2. She undoubtedly 18 patriotic but disaprees stronaly with certain PBERNE policies. 3. She 15, at the tire being at least, almost completely dependent on the KUEARs salary paid her. san....... Lest i de is holleris" stad titin in sinterine --- ## Page 4 • . SECRET SECTION' OPERATIONAL USE CONTACT 1F SUBJECT MAS DIES USED DE CONTACIED GEFORE, INDICATE ACTIVITY IN MUICH HE DAS ENGAGED ASD TAI HYPE DE IPUSSH- MATION •..* INDICATE HOE AND FRON ANDS SUBJECT OBTAINS INFORMATION. S. INDICATE ANAT HAS BEEN TOLD SUBJECT AS TO INE DISPOSITION OF INFORMATION ME FURNISHES. • "* ;.:":? DETAIL SUBJICTOS PROPOSED FI OR CI TYPE USE OR DUTIES. 3. DITATE SUBJECT•S FOSPOST :2.:.:..1 UST OR BUTTES SECTION VII PROPOSED LIAISON OR OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY DETAIL SUBJECT'S PASPOSED LIAISO TIRE SDITAÇI DR SREPATIOSAL USE . A. "HERE SUBJECI IS AN OFFICIAL MEMBER OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT: "I'd • 10÷903.1" B. WHERE SUBJECT IS AN OFFICIAL MEMBER OF AN ODOKE AGENCY: iting. in: SECTION VIII AGENCY RELATIONSHIP WITH SUBJECT RELATIONSHIO WITH SUBJECTS DOE, TRAINEE, OPPOSITE NUMBER, RENUVERATION. OF ANT: AGENCY PERSONNEL ANONA TO SUBJECT. 3i00 Cerebio "rar curle Ma ceraline Borgotly serviceig Is paid 40a 250.00 Perchiv; -90 1395970071011119991 catcher For ter For 3 SECRET --- ## Page 5 SECRET SECTION 1X QUALIFICATIONS FOR OTHER DREPATIONS INDICATE SPECIAL GRILITIES, PALENTS, OR QUALIFICATIONS POSSESSED DO SUBJECE ANICH COULO CONCELUGEL. BE OF MALEE OTHER OPERATIJAS. 112? SECTION X COMMI THEA TS IF IS PROPOSED SPAr COUMODITILS. INDICATE TAL DEERLY AMOUNT, IF PAYMENT 1O DE MADE IN IREN SUASIDY OR OTHER METHOD, SPECIFY AND GIVE DETAILS. Cubject 025.911 corridies, solelies or 1?X.21d irts 2. OTHERMISE NOY COVERED MEREIO, MADE TO SUBJECT, (EXARDIE. COUMAIMONIS famely.) 1. te:? -this !:!" • About 21." 1:31; 1IC ^1' ieet.macin :: !??' srir nitri, "it •.294- SECTION XI CE AND SECURITY LODICATE THE FIELO AGENCIES AND GIELD FILES MITH OMICH SUBJECS-S NAME HAS BEEN CHECKED AND THE IS. model LICENTO - AOTEATE OTHER TSESTTSATIVE MEASURES TAREY TO VEDIFY BIOGRAPMIERE INtORMATION FURLISHED BY p::=00°1 encoraint 1722300106 162. 01'22 Paring: Not INDICATE WHETHER T9 45T PAOTTASHAL APPROVAL OR OFENGTIOLAL AP. PROVAL FOR SUBJECT'S USE HAS BEEN PREPIOUSLY OBTAIDED. DATE APPADIAL DOTAIRED EVALUATE SUBJECTES CORDACIEN, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY, CITING EVIDENCE MIERE POSSIBLE. ;.2?121: -..a on "casion/ineolo deal snint or vier, or isaacs 2. camill load not G. 55:7182: c: aocuri 5.:0» malaria: 11s 125790 rainie, ribera she d0:211.r: EXPLAIN ANY SITUATION OR INDISCRETIDR IN AMICH SUBJECY MAY HAVE BEES INVOLVED AMICH MUST BE EVALUATEO ERJOR A CE/OPERATIONAL SECURITT VIEWPOINT. is ludlocaica not imom croade do catciuerars con ba cited ióri, 15a cas cost ace wen in moct dale the latter as in tadeo, le not feecordt:" to her) ear munna, dreact 30012222 1nd cita 0690ra SECTION KII SUBJECT'S PERSONAL MADITS 1. USE OF LIQUOR. DRUGS: GAMBLING, PARANOURS. unect irnia socially, biù is not tolleved to sink excesaivel. Eradar, d'e 13 no loliered to coe druno of' ony tina, exceed for reiteinal curredes and iderán. incited anitations. orally, che Ful not ie grainst it: didna, but sais are ies not trile, Maranour have toen covend elsartare in this for. SECRET --- ## Page 6 Section XI, 5. 30 Securitys The has proven to be reasoratly security conselous, hounver, her Intirate relationship with Ll'iLlCil, and rossible with others constitute potential security intards. The 13 descreet in her phone conversations with the case officer, md in the rectanies of miin. reetlas. She sonetimes tures down necting places surcasted by the case officer, savinr that some of her noquaintances visit the place or the area surrested, or that coulet and/or Satellite personnel are believed to visit the piace or era. The (reatest potential securits hazard, the polter belleves, is the type of situation, nesual and/or erotional Involverent, which she wirht allow herselr to becore involved in. Section XI, 6e 2. In an effort to pavo the say for Illudis retum to lexico, she lia Incereedad :1th various lexican Coverarent of cials, and caused certain she orridec copies of letter written, and received lucm LILUCk, clipidem from the press, and suraries of her conversations with ledcan Covement personnel. --- ## Page 7 SECRET SECTION RElI AVOCATIONAL INTERESTS S• IADICATE SUBJECT-S HOBBIES OR INTEREST IN SPORTS, MUSIC. ETC. shock desca. 23990212169 1101: 50191t SECTICE XIV GENERAL DEA COUNTRE DE SCROS OTHER NEARE SOUNT ES ALA OMER CHAMACTERISTICS, ARE SUCH AS ME CONLO PASS AS A NATIVE OE A COUMYRY ON AF104 OTHER sect late to presidal doerence, do could parall not post do trateee cition contri INDICATE WHETHER IUFCRUATION 1& PRO PARTS I AND CORDESPONDENCE OR OTHER MEANS. ,..i it taint! on tra dr for colon cottad.tar 1 wrest tin" #AS OBTAINED BY RESEARCH, CLANDESTINE ASSESSMENT. 1ti1s 11902 1o20 Ted FILES. ..:}1 /ORER YAN POUTINS SCION IS PEQUIRED, IF AND NHER TERMINATION OF SUBJECT IS ERECTED, OLGASE EXPLANA: (A1D0 sapra) he gates matten doude ar SECTION XY DHERGENCY CORDITIONS RECCH TACT ARRAHGEMENTS GIVE FULL DETAILS I.E, RECOGNITION SIGNALS, S'#: COIN COYTACT BE MADE: MARINE CONTACT USES ^.?:. in: 3 t09tot1s ix. Do cataster sa 1212 101 "1re Dua care hes cean tira 60 ter Cor tire Coroa coricor code te uner. t!5 ДИАТ ДОДА ГАРЕСТСОУКО 101H: CHE: 31 T-1, SECTION XVI MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONAL DATA AND REMARKS 100101110 Comtoced Protestio Mith Catal de112 cluele to concirbances, ÷318 DO 2511:5 in ircicine coontial cittalio. Cádiso mice te rosicite and revon tich Pois Che aho:0d decialtaid not de diven ang more infortion con for vor to averanlia: he tasion arained tor. atised ales bore, due pericero selectie to condie sould do rature, 290 ecarteners in6 8.636 105 be youncer than site It 1o colora that a axerienced concle care secur peter aprocinate ad could co to valia de nes letter, tian a rate coco DATE 10 CrANe 1163 5 SECRET ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10192-10062.pdf
104-10192-10062
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
07/27/1960
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
MASH
CABLE RE: RE PARA 1 AND 2 REF: AMPALM-5 SAID BOATS DO EXIST, BELIEVE
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-27 : F5 : 1998.04.10.18:07:35:030115 :
1
## Page 1 104-10192-10062 RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce CLASS SIED MESSAGE "ATE TO FioM ACTION: 270 JL 6O DIRECTOR CAL pa, 51 ML 23 0938? 60 1. 76- CЭP, C03, A033/4, S/6 2 Wit DIV NOTIFIEO 2110 27M160) PRIORITY IN 30269 PARTY DIR MURA CIES MASH 9236 2UET SEE REVA 5:25(11: 901) * 1O 8E PIRA 1 IND Z 8EF: AMPAL:-S SAID BOATS DO EXIST, BELIEVES NÃO CUSA WAS SEVERAL AVAILASLE. COES NOT KNOW NAMES BOATS BUT SAID TIS LEGATED COJIMARO AMPALM-S SUGGESTED WIECHA CONTACT SEGUNDO AGRANDA CAD CUESTION HEN PE EOATS UMICH ME CAMPALM-S) MAS DEFINITE LATCH VECHING FOR TABIR EXISTENCE. REFUs 3 ACT: ROCORDENS AlPALI-S TiDE COMPLYCUG WITH BENDER AGGRET TO CUP2LY153 MEY FOR MILET TRINING. *STATED IN PIST STA HAS BEEN OFFERED UNKNOWN NUMBER OF BOATS, BUT 1-2: Cales 00.., ELATS MAVE DEN EITHER SUNK, SOLD OR CONFISCATED. ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-10279-10020.pdf
124-10279-10020
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
08/30/1967
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CR 109-12-221-1792
CIA
2
CIA
HQ
3/12/18
null
## Page 1 124-10279-10020 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 5/7/2015 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER: 124-10279-10020 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : CR 109-12-221-1792 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FROM: TO : TITLE : CIA CIA DATE: 08/30/1967 PAGES: 2 SUBJECTS : EGD, CLASH, RIVAL FACTIONS, COPRA GROWERS UNION, ACAPULCO DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Confidential RESTRICTIONS: CURRENT STATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 04/30/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF CIA COMMENTS : v9.1. HH 50953 DocId: 32301685 Page 1 --- ## Page 2 *ROUTINE CEN RAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Intelhgence Information C. le 1N- 41475 STATE/INR DIA FBI NMCC/MC ( SECDEF JCS ARMY NAVY AIR) CIA/NMCC NIC USIA NSA "ONE PAGE 1'OF 2 PAGES OCR 5D0 AID ORR DCS CGS This material contains information sflecting Becs. 793. and 794, the transmisson revelation he National Defense of the United States within the mering one to taws, tate lo, u.s.e i which in any manner GROUP I Excuded from outematie downpreding and declorifeation NO FOREIGN DISSEM THIS IS AN INFORMATION REPORT. NOT FINALLY EVALUATED INTELLIGENCE. CITE TDCS -314/13013-67 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L 300659Z REC 18 DIST ,30 AUGUST 1967 Matters COUNTRY: MEXICO DOI: AUGUST 1967 SUBJECI: (ARREST OF FEDERAL DEPUTY CESAR DEL INGE ENTE SA FOR AGIIATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN GUERRERO ACQ: SOURCE: MEXICO, MEXICO CITY (29 AUGUST 1967) FIELD REPORT NO. HMM- 11,295 HIS REPORTING CIA HAS NO OBJECTION DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR, RELEASE OF CTANINFORMAT IN THIS DOCUMENTAS SANITIZ GMA BIANA KP 1-14-98 HAS BEEN RELIABLE :.SINCE EARLY 1966.J ALL FBI INFORMATION CONTAINED ATE 2-18-9531.5608510 KSK THE ROLE OF FEDERAL DEPUTY FROM THE 12- 779 STATE OF VERACRUZ, CESAREER ANGEL FUENTES, IN THE CLASH BE- TWEEN RIVAL FACTIONS OF THE COPRA GROWERS' UNISH IN ACAPULCO, GUERRERO, OVER THE WEEKEND OF 19-20 AUGUSI T967 , RESULTING IN THE DEAIH OF ABOUT THIRTY PERSONS AND THE WOUNDING OF ABOUT ONE HUNDRED, HAS BEEN WIDELY PUBLICIZED IN THE MEXICAN PRESS. THERE HAS BEEN SPECULATION THAT HE WOULD BE ARRESTED, BUT FOR 07 Adop •HIS CONGRESSIONAL IMMUNITY. HIS IMMUNITY, HOWEVER, EXPIRES оди в • SEP 111987 C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L NO FOREIGN DISSEM (09-02-ZE? NH 50953 DocId: 32301685 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 279-10020 Auc 31 11 45 AM °67 C-O-N-F-1-D-E-N-F-4LASQN SENO FOREIGN DISSEM IN-41475 TDCS - 314/13013-67 PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES (classification) -(dissemi controls. WITH HIS TERM ON I SEPTEMBER. > 2. ON 28 AUGUST 1967, AGENTS OF THE MINISTRY OF GOVERN- MENT (GOBERNACION) ARRESTED FEDERAL DEPUTY CESAR DEL ANGEL AS HE WAS LEAVING THE HOME OF ELENASGARRO DESPAZ, LEFTIST MEXICAN PLAYWRIGHT. HE IS BEING INTERROGATED ABOUT HIS ROLE IN THE "ACAPULCO MURDERS." petites 3. FIELD DISSEM: STATE ARMY NAVY AIR FBI CINCSO REPORT CLASS: CONFIDENTIAL NO FOREIGN DISSEM C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L Laser NH 50953 DocId: 32301685 Page 3 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10065-10401.pdf
104-10065-10401
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
4/12/78
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CARPENTIER, PATRICK/OLC
WARREN, RAYMOND A./C/LA DIV
DISPATCHES TO AND FROM MEXICO FOR PERIOD 15 OCTOBER THRU 26 NOV 1963.
3
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK11 : F11 : 1993.07.14.16:21:03:680340 : ROUTING SHEET IS PAGE 1 OF DOCUMENT.
3
## Page 1 104-10065-10401 J: UNCLASSIFIED L INTERNAL SE ONLY CONFIDENTIAL ROUTING AND. RECORD SH SECRET 'SUBJECT: (Optionol) OLG RECORD COPY FROM: EXTENSION NO. Rodger S. Affabri165 KM '78 OLC/CER 1133 DATE 13 April 1978 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) DATE OFFICER'S INITIALS COMMENTS (Number. each comment lo show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) RECEIVED FORWARDED 1. 'i done! MI. Shepanek 0/SA/D0/0 Tube: Harold Leap, HSCA staff, DX6-Green wants the name ofl for the years 1957 and 1958 to close the l00p on his inquiry as to whether had any relationship with Oswald Kim File HSCA when he was in Japan. ted. Gabrielson 10 1t 3: The for the years 1991. 1958 was. Mr. Joke Baker. Me. Baker died nü 1964. Masant 12. 13 14. 15. FORM 3-62 610 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS SECRET CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY # 06532 UNCLASSIFIED --- ## Page 2 14-00000 12 APR 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Patrick Carpentier Office of Legislative Counsel VIA FROM SUBJECT SA/D0/0 : Raymond A. Warren Chief, Latin America Division Dispatches to and from Mexico for period 15 October through 26 November 1963 REFERENCE HSCA Request of 9 March 1978 Attached are copies of 407 dispatches covering the period 14 October through 29 November 1963. to and from Headquarters.and the Mexico City Station and Monterrey Base. These dispatches are bioken down as follows: No. Dispatches 221 120 55 11 From Mexico City Hqs Monterrey Hqs To Symbol Hqs HMMA Mexico City • HMMW Hqs HMY A Monterrey HMYW 2. These dispatches contain sensitive operational and privileged information. Accordingly, the review of these documents must be done under strict security controlled conditions. Any notes taken from these documents by the HSCA reviewer(s) must cite dispatch and paragraph number; otherwise it will be impossible to conduct the necessary note review and will preclude the release of the notes to the HSCA. 3. No copies of these dispatches are to be made and the attached dispatches are to be returned to this Division these dispatches immediately following the HSCA review. siezed Raymond d. Tasren Raymond A. Warren Attachments: 407 dispatches a/s THAt: 10:16 AND WHO 1104D SEREST E2 IMPDET CL BY 9560 # 06533 --- ## Page 3 14-00000 OLGELA SUBJECT: Dispatches to and from Mexico for period 15 October through 26 November 1963 DDO/C/LA/STB/WSturbitts:esm (X9127) (12 Apr 78) Distribution: Orig - Addressee w/att 1 - SA/DO/0 w/o att - C/LA w/o att 1 - C/ LA/ST.B 2 300R2T ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10177-10023.pdf
104-10177-10023
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
08/29/1959
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
FBI
CIA
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS OF DOMINIC BARTONE.
2
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK64-13 : F12 : 1998.02.26.17:24:56:390102 :
2
## Page 1 104-10177-10023 LASSIER MESSAG ROUTING WITARI 2056 DATE. 38 AUGEST 1858 10. YEDER'I ERRAO OF IMISTINITICH PROM, DIRECTOR COMTRAL ISTELLTORACI AGENCY come, Vort 51 no. 61, C1/ 0P3, 51, S/6? LOEFEURIO As 29 1946:59 OBIT OPEHARONAS Tota TO 00190983 909:3 CITE CER NOPORI /OQNYINUED COITIOL THON: • Fixara, SARAH 0287) 16-7 DATI OP IIO 26-28 AUOUST 1959 SUBJECT: 1 TOLICIAL PRANSAGTILNS OF DOSINICA BARTONE *TUÁN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce LO' REPELSICS IS XUDE SO OUR OUS-POBL TO JOUR BUREAU, LATTE 27 AUGUSS 195%, WHICH REPORTED THAT DONUTE BARTONE ALSO RETORTED AS BETO, MAD SETT A LANTER TO PARAMA LITT A LARDS ANCONT OF CUSE TO OPTI A GARLATTO ACCOUTE DI TRI PARAMA CITY BRAIGH OF THE NATIONAL CITY BATK AND TRAY THEJS JUDS MY DE CCTNTID WITH MILITAN ALCANDER MOROAR, AMERICAN CITIZEY NO LAS BUEY BADADED IT REVOLITTONART AGTIVITIRS IN CURA, RISINCE AIRO IS LUDE TO TOVE ANORAMUN DATSO 5 ATUST 1958, YOUR FILS FUGIE 105-70973, CONCERTTHO MORIA DID BARTONE. 2O OU 88 AUGUST 1959 A FAINLI REZIABLE SOUNCE REPRISED TILT TEN PERONE MORON BUTTONE SENT TO PARAMA SO OMEN SRI ACCOVIT WAS ONE NIRE PSALIALS, LAN PARTIER ON CREDORI PASTLES, ALDRESS 2720 TIRSI RATIONAL DUI SULLUDIO, HIAT, TORIDA, PRALIAS NAS CARTIONO A POTLE ON $70,000, OF MICÙ $15, 000 MIRE IS 1, 000 DOLLE IRiS. AB PRINT TO OPET AN ACCQUIT IN THE HAS OF SERVICIOS DITIOLACIONS Sado, HITH PIS OTET AUTHORIIÃO SIONITURE ON CRICKS TO BI THAT OF DOMINSE BARTONE. SUB SARA REPRUESSPLATIVSS IN PAYAMA ARE ARIAS, PAERERA UD PADRIA. TIES PIKH IS KRADED 0018++ REFFOOUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMITED Cop 12 ZIBR --- ## Page 2 CLASSIFED MESSAGE ALTREO 10 PIOM. DIRECTOR JO CONER ANO. 1DE91AEI0 I BOUTINA PRIORITY OPERAIIONA LALLEDIAN 7:r 90933 INFO CITE DIR IL HAPSODIO ARIAS SALICE, HIFI SEVERAL PARTIERS, INCLUDINO ARTASO SON, OILERS, NID CARLOS AROSHOA ABORRODL NAS RUDI PIACINO OONSIDIRABIE PRISSURE ON IN BUITO MARITI ANONIE AGIVE BUT 1S DE 20 MI MEN FARE ME MET NOCENTEE JO THE SOVACE OS TRIS DIPORTATI # IS SEISITIVE AND CARE SIOULD BE DUECISA IE DIVEZOFISO LELDS ON THIS KATTEA, (BAD OF MESS403) 21-7 ADOTE DITO RARIO OTTO PACTITES, IN 29282. interno oeriere.-ii B &C RET ICEHLOCHLIACONE REPROOUCTION AT OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMIBITED. aMericarine oreisse Copa! ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32289108.pdf
124-10200-10384
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
05/25/1967
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
105-165503-25
DIRECTOR, FBI
LEG, MX
8
FBI
HQ
3/1/18
INC MEMO, NOTE
8
## Page 1 JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY: FBI RECORD_NUMBER: 124-10200-10384 RECORD_ SERIES: HO AGENCY FILE_NUMBER: 105-165503-25 DOCUMENT INFORMATION ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: LEG. MX TO: DIRECTOR. FBI TITLE: DATE: 05/25/1967 PAGES: 8 SUBJECT: DOCUMENT TYPE: ORIGINAL CLASSIFICATION: REVIEW DATE: STATUS PAPER. TEXTUAL DOCUMENT Secret 03/16/1998 Redact NEW CLASSIFICATION: UPDATE DATE: RESTRICTIONS: JFK Act 6 (4) COMMENTS: INC MEMO, NOTE DocId: 32289108 Page 1 --- ## Page 2 09 also ALL INFORMATION CONTAINAD HERCIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OTHERWISE on Cont ential SECRET Mr • J. Walter Yeagley Assistant Attorney General 4-12-94 Director, FBI Declassily on: QAD& JF FRANK ANGELO TOTIN, and others REPONTED PLANS TO BLOW UP CUBAN SHIP IN MEXICAN PORT, POSSIBLY VERACRUZ INTERNAL SECURITY - CUBA NEUTRALITY HATTERS - CUBA - 1 Nic. Mr. May 31, 1967 Wannall Nasca CLASSIFIED: AND REASON FCIM, IV DATE OF h DECLASSIFILATION TON 5/33/92 Reference is made to our previous communications in the captioned matter, particularly to our communication dated way 19, 1967, which transmitted a number of photographs depicting ca recovery of the buried explosives by Mexican authorities. on way 45, 1900, our representative in Mexico fur- nished the following intormatione Declassi The explosives recovered from the burial place in the State of Tamaulipas, Mexico, are in the custody of the Mexican Army in Mexico City. The possibility of having the explosives presented at a trial within the United States together with competent witness from the Direccion Federal de Seguridad Federal Security Police or the Army has been proposed 1967 to the lexican Government. MAILED 9 MAY COMM-FBI On May 25, 1967, Fernando Gutierrez Barrios, Director of the DES, and Rafael Hernandez Ochos, Under Secretary of Goverment (Interior), advised that no decision has been reached as the matter is very sensitive politically. There is a feeling that the DES should not be compromised in this matter even though they are anxious to see the subjects prosécuted. While it might be possible for Mexican Army AGENCIES Cas demolition experts to testify; this also poses political problems which require further thought. Our representative noted that the final decisione In this matter may rest with the presidency. f(U) APPROPRIATE AND FIED Tolson This is for your information and you will be lept DeLoach - advised Mobr of developments. Wick Casper Callahan REC. 52 Classtied by 304 Conrad Felt 105-165503 25 /us Exempt/stom GDS Categony Gale 2 - Miami Rosen 2 Sullivan - Mexico City Tavel Trotter Foreign Tele. Room Holmes J LAN Us 1967 Liaison Unit for Gandy (10NL ROOML TELETYPE UNITL MAIL ROOM I (Route Through Review) 105-16550329 • Coo!1 antial SELE NOTE TPAGE TWO UHN DocId: 32289108 Page 2 DATA --- ## Page 3 4-3 TReV. 1=27-669 DECODED COPY ential xxX CABLEGRAM $ RADIO SECRET TELETYPE Tolson DeLoach Mohi - Wick - Casper Callahan Conrad Felt Sulli Tave Trotter Tele.' Room Holmes Gandy O AIRGRAM STATE 04 URGENT 50625-67 TO DIRECTOR (105-965503) FROM LEGAT MEXICO CITY NO. 289 APPRO AND FIFIT ADVIDED AGENeTE accified AES Exemat from TING Date of Declas 204 Indefinate 1+81 ALI, INFORMATION CONTAINED HERRIM IS UNCLASSIFIED 2x22 WABRE SHOWN OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED AN EXTENDED B REASON BION FCIM, II, & DATE OF REV FOR DECLASSIFICATION.. 5| 35192(7 INTERNAL SECURITY FRANK ANGELS Cha QRINI, AKA; ET ALO • CUBA, Mac rude Declassiy Q0: PAIR Classified REBUAIRTEL MAY 9 LAST. Declassify gn: GADR 6, 18,3 THIS OFFICE HAS DETERMINED THAT EXPLOSIVES RECOVERED: FROM BURIAL PLACE IN STATE OF TAMAULIPAS, MEXICO, ARE IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MEXICAN ARMY AT MEXICO CITY THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING THE EXPLOSIVES PRESENTED AT A TRIAL WITHIN THE UNITED STATES TOGETHER WITH À COMPETENT WITNESS FROM THE DIRECCION FEDERAL DE SEGURIDAD (DES - FEDERAL SECURITY POLICE) THE ARMY HAS BEEN PROPOSED TO THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT. DFS, AND RAFAEL HERNANDEZ OCHOA, UNDERSEGRETARY OF GOVERIMEN ON MAY 25 INSTANT, FERNANDA GUTIERRE ZAARIOS, ORECTOR (INTERIOR) ADVISED THAT NO DECISION HAS BEEN REACHED AS THE "RICES MATTER IS VERY SENSITIVE POLITICALLY. THERE IS A FEELING THAT THE DES SHOULD NOT BE COMPROMISED IN THIS MAITER EVEN and rape!: ICEMAN M REG. 52 #o: 60 5729168 105-0 MR DELOACH FOR THE DIRECTOR 11 JUN 1967 If the intelligence contained in the above message is to be disseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be suitably paraphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems. Coz SECRET DATE -25 DocId: 32289108 Page 3 --- ## Page 4 1-3° (ev. 1-27-66) = AIRGRAM DECODED COPY Confidential SECRET Xx CABLEGRAM RADIO TELETYPE PAGE 2 FROM LEGAT MEXICO CITY NO. 289 THOUGH THEY ARE ANXIOUS TO SEE SUBJECTS PROSECUTED. WHILE IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE MEXICAN ARMY DEMOLITION EXPERTS TO TESTIFY, THIS ALSO POSES POLITICAL PROBLEMS THAT REQUIRE FURTHER THOUGHT. THIS OFFICE IS OF THE OPINION THE FINAL DECISION IN THIS MATTER MAY REST WITH PRESIDENCY. DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE FOLLOWED CLOSELY AND BUREAU KEPT ADVISED. 44) Tolson DeLoach Mohr — Wick Casper Callahan - Conrad - Felt - Gale - Roser - Sullivan Tavel - Trotter Tele. Room Holmes: Gandy RECEIVED: 9:48 PM JRL CC- MR SULLIVAN "': 3RD CC MR. BRENNAN Confidestial 105-165503-25 f the intelligence contained in the above message is to be disseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be suitabl araphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems SECRET DocId: 32289108 Page 4 --- ## Page 5 4-3 Kev. 1127-98) 3 DECODED COPY Conf jential SECRET • AIRGRAM XXX CABLEGRAM, MIT, RADIO TELETYPE STATE 044 412:14506 kee Classinted URGENT 5025-67 Declassity on: OAUT TO DIRECTOR (105-165503) FROM/LEGAT MEXICO CITY NO. 289 Tolson. De Loach . Mohi — Wick — Casper Callahan Conrad Felt - Gale - Rosen Sullivan Tavel Trotter Tele. Room Holmes Gandy DE gorone Напп Classified D Declassify on: OAR 6/15/63 FRANK ANGELO FIORINI, AKAS ET AL. IS • CURASSED ARUBA Se/29 EXTENDED 1 1 70177 10 REASON FCIM, 71, REBUAIRTEL MAY 9 LAST. DATE OF RONIC FOR THIS OFFICE HAS DETERMINED THAT EXPLOFFLESS RECOVERED 5125192 FROM BURIAL PLACE IN STATE OF TAMAULIPAS, MEXICO, ARE IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MEXICAN ARMY AT MEXICO CITY. THE POSSIBILITY ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN OTHERWISE OF HAVING THE EXPLOSIVES PRESENTED AT A TRIAL WITHIN THE UNITED STATES (TOGETHER WITH A COMPETENT WITNESS FROM THE DIRECCION FEDERAL DE SEGURIDAD (DFS • FEDERAL SECURITY POLICE) OR THE ARMY HAS BEEN PROPOSED TO THE MEXICAN GOVERNWENT. ON MAY: 25 INSTANT, FERNANDO GUTIERREZ BARRIOS, DIRECTORS DFS, AND RAFAEL HERNANDEZ OCHOA, UNDERSECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT (INTERIOR) ADVISED THAT NO DECISION MAS BEEN REACHED AS THE MATTER IS VERY SENSITIVE POLITICALLY. THERE IS AFFEELING E THAT THE DFS SHOULD NOT BE COMPROMISED IN THIS BET REVER (S MATTER EVEN Let I6 AM gragley 1 ra - 11)111 SEROPRTATE AdENCIES 2040 IVE FIELDOFTACES VAN: 5/31/61 Classified Exempt from GDS Category, I ADVISED BY Date of Declas rication Indefinate 00TING SLIP(S) OF DATE to by Mi If the intelligence contained in the above message is to be de?lemibated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be suitably paraphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems Core ent 1a1 SECRET 105-16550-3-25 DocId: 32289108 Page 5 --- ## Page 6 Ionfidential DECODED COP YSECRET • AIRGRAM XX CABLEGRAM RADIO _ TELETYPE PAGE 2 FROM LEGAT MEXICO CITY NO 289 THOUGH THEY ARE ANXIOUS TO SEE SUBJECTS PROSECUTED. WHILE IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE MEXICAN ARMY DEMOLITION EXPERTS TO TESTIFY, THIS ALSO POSES POLITICAL PROBLEMS THAT REQUIRE FURTHER THOUGHT. (C) THIS OFFICE IS OF THE OPINION THE FINAL DECISION IN THIS MATTER MAY REST WITH PRESIDENCY DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE FOLLOWED CLOSELY AND BUREAU KEPT ADVISED: Tolson. De Loach Mohi - Wick - Casper Callahan Conrad Felt - Gale - Rosen Sultel: Tav: Trottsh Tele...oom Holmed Gandy RECEIVED: 9:48 PM JRL ORIG: MR. DELOACH FOR DIRECTOR LEFELADE OMIL BRD CC: MR. BRENNAN HEARINED I the intelligence contained in the above message is to be dieseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be suitabl araphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems Considential SECRETS 105-165503-25 DocId: 32289108 Page 6 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10140-10422.pdf
104-10140-10422
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
5/2/77
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
JOURNAL: OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL MONDAY - 2 MAY 1977--HSCA GUIDELINES
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK53 : F6 : 1993.08.04.17:09:20:250058 :
1
## Page 1 104-10140-10422 Cre INFERNAL USE UNLY Journal - Office of Iogislative Counsel Monday - 2 May 1977 COMBER NA! 5-26 HSCA 77-0007126 suideline. Page 6 24. (Confidential - DEM) LIAISON Called Bill Milleï, Staff Director, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and set up a meeting for him with @ric Isenstead®C/CCS, at 1l:00 a.rn. on 3 April to discuss a story regarding Agency cover placements which may appear shortly in the Chicago Sun Times. I also asked Miller if there was any remaining assistance the Agency could provide on the matter of a briefcase temporarily lost by one member of the Committee staff and Miller said he thought not. 25. (Confidential - DEM) LIAISON Received a call from Stan Taylor, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staff, who referenced one answer provided by the. Agency to the supplemental questions submitted by the Committee regarding Agency activities in Micronesia. Taylor thought that the documents referenced in this answer might help in convincing the Committee to delete the most offensive sentence in the interim report. I promised to bring the materials to Taylor the following morning. 26. (Unclassified - GLC) LIAISON Steve Fallis, House Select Committee on Assassinations staff, called in follow-up of his callin Friday concerning yeeritelearatesand related matters. I told him that Mr. Doug Cummins would be in touch with him today, after he has talked with our Security people. 27. (Confidential - GLC) LIAISON Called Sam Hoskinson, National Security Council staff, to check on the President's contacts with the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on the Micronesia statement. He confirmed that the President had talked with Chairman Daniel Inouye (D., Hawaii) on Friday afternoon and the Chairman had indicated that the Committee would hold off any action on the statement until Chairman Inouye returned to Washington and the Committee meets on Tuesday. At that time, the matter will be brought before the full Committee again. Hoskinson said the President was also considering calling Senator Gary Hart (D., Colo.) on the matter. 18941 96.4 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10218-10046.pdf
104-10218-10046
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
01/01/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
(ASSET) SUPPORT
16
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-53 : F22 : 1998.04.30.14:33:12:373082 : 16 PAGES NOT BELIEVED RELEVANT (NBR)
16
## Page 1 104-10218-10046 HOUSE SELECT COMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS STAFF NEW:ES FILE TITLE /NIER/VOL: KDACETUNE (LIHUFF) (1 Vol) Support 50-134-18/3 INCLUSIVE DATES: A Apí 1963 - 28 Oct 1921 CUSTODIAL. UNIT/LOCATIOY: POs: 2011 DELETIONS, IF'AVY: None TATE TATT RECEIVED RETURNED REVIEWED BY (PRINT NATE SUGNATURE OF REVIEWING CFFICIA!. NOT REVIEWED BY HSCA FOCUNRES MAY BE COrTERRE RIMONED FRON THIS FILI. SCONT 109d RETUENT TO RECORDS C MATERIAL FIRED IN THIS TOLE IS IN CHRONOLOGICAL, ONL KDACETONE 50-124-28/2 " LIHUFF SUPPORT 50-124-28/2 --- ## Page 2 14-00000 1 11m 171 12 00 1 00. CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE -.- : THIS FILE HAS BEEN PROCESSED AND RETIRED. DO NOT ADD ANY DOCUMENTS TO THIS FOLDER. FORWARD CS DOCUMENTS THAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THIS FOLDER TO IP /RPU GE-58. NOTICE CONFIDENTIAL .... foRE 2593 17-13) ...... - А им. --- ## Page 3 14-00000 SECRET (WHEN FILED DN) •ROM: (Heodquarters componeni) WH/1 Mexico TO SUBJECT AND PROJECT FILE REQUEST AND FIELD NOTIFICATION OF ACTION IP/AN TO : (Station/Bose) FROM: (Division) Chief of Station, Mexico City Chief, Western Hemisphere Division INFORMATION FOR REQUESTERS COMPLETE ITEMS I THROUGH 12. ITEM 10- ENTER OLD TITLE WHEN AMENDING A TITLE, CITE ANY FILES, SUCH AS 201 OR PROJECT FILES THAT ARE RE. ITEM 3 ALL FILE TITLES MUST BE STERILE SINCE THEY WILL APPEAR ON THE FIELD COPIES AND ON MACHINE LISTS LATED TO THE FILE COVERED BY THIS REQUEST ITEM 1O MAY ALSO BE USED TO GIVE REASONS FOR THE ACTION BEING RE• ITEM E- ALL REMARKS MUST BE STERILE. QUESTED. TO IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF MATERIAL TO BE PLACED IN A FILE OR TO MAKE OTHER EXPLANATORY REMARKS ITEM 7 AND B-USE FIRST THREE LETTERS OF DISPATCH SYM. STATIONS AND LIST HEADQUARTERS ELE- ITEM 11 - A RECORDS OFFICER MUST SIGN ALL FILE ACTION RE• MENTS ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED NUMERIC CODES QUESTS CONSULT YOUR RHO ON ANY PROBLEMS THAT ARISE. INFORMATION CONCERNING FILE TYPE OF FILE •QUE IFILE NUMBE COUNTRY NUMBER ATEGORY NUMBE SUBJECT PROJECT 50 124 ISPECIFIC SURJECT NUMBER 28/2 3. FILE TITLE (SPECIFIC SUBJECT) (PROJECTS LIMITED TO 15 SPACES! KDACETONE ANALYSIS ACTION OPEN FILE X CLOSE FILE INDICATE DISPOSITIONI AMEND FILE TITLE GEOPEN 6. REMARKS (FOR FIELD DISTRIBUTION) ACTION REQUIRED 5. RETAIN DISPOSITION TDESTRUCTION RECOMMENDED THRU DATE! 7. INTERESTED STATIONS (PROJECTS ONLY, TE INTERESTED HEADOUARTERS DESK LIST ACTION DESK FIRSTI HMM 50 9. FILES ACTION [CHARGE PERMANENTLY TO OFFICER & DESKI 10L0 B CS FILE RESTRICTED UNRESTRICTED REPARE FOLDER AN END TO REQUESTE T0. COMMENTS INCLUDE SPECIAL HEADQUARTERS ROUTING INSTRUCTIONSI ENDORSEMENT FrECTIVE DATE 28 ocl 71 FORM 82-83 DESOLETE PREVIOUS 812 G. 2-€ 12. •CORDINATION 50 SECRET CODE 124 .... RIO APPROVAL REQUEST APPROVED BY 38 | 28/2 I-S COPY --- ## Page 4 .S-E-C=R-E-T. DATE CE CRYPTONIM CHANGE - 2ÖSO4171 KDACETONE FORMER CRYPTÖVIM - LIHUFF CRYPTONY! CHANGE AUTHORIZED BY COMPONENT - RID/AN IRO OR RID SECTION CHIEFI - GiDLE OR DOCLHENT REFERENCE (FROM ITEM IO OF FORM 8121 =_HUMS=7138 N-D-T-I-C-E ...... THIS IS AN RID NOTICE CF A CHANGE IN FILE •____ TITLE CRYPTONYM CAUSEO BY COMPROMISE. IT .. .. ..... ... IS TO BE PLACED IN THE FILE INDICATED AND TO REMAIN THEREIN'ÄS" A PERMANENT DRTICINL CS RECORD. . S-E-C-R-E-T FILE IN - 050-124-028102 --- ## Page 5 SECHET Ciricia Station, 'axico cite % NO PICIO BANDID ONLY DUANED LISK CAN FUSA BEELING CHief. NOGANE SUBTLET LINUFF /1. Social Security Benefits REFS: i. ICT 10, 210 B. Dook Dispalch 6900, 11 :larcn 1969 I'mile undar contract to UNLitiCE from 1958 to February, 1970, LINUFF/1 accurulated mino croditable quartors unir the Social Socurity f. dinistration (SSA) accuculated under trus nano but have not get been trans- ferred to S5A. Ona quarter crodited under alias is already posted in the SSa.por With Station approval, Heducuarters intonds to transfer the cignt quarters accumulated under true nara to so and have sieutarcously the one duarter dictalias merged into the true nade account trough the intercession of a cleard 55A contact. tolue would be identified as Lilure/l's a ployer for all nine quarters, SSA account will not sion any uklaice interest or conncction. The advantane of this procodure is that efter all creditable servico and contributions nove been recorded in SeA, LIlUFF/l can correspond directly with ssi on any questions lie may have as to ino arounts ne is entitled jKLAiCE will ba cut out excuse if LItUFF/T siould nave any quastions on the arount of credit he earned during his UNLANCE service. In this case, he rould hava to contact tie Station for forvarding nis questions to Head uartors and resolution with appropriate SSA contacts. 2. Following Station action is therefore required: a. Hocity lisadquarters that no objection exists to the transfer Caslinclin para l above; b. Brief LilFs/l Chat his SSA credits are being transferred to SSA for ricording bu: that their posting nay take as long six ronths boccuse of routine posting backlog in SSA; (2) he should therafore not expect a consolidation of all of his SSA credits until about the cad of calendar ycar 1970 and should rot begin correspondence with SSA until (3) sinca dia had carned SSi credits prior to his UNLACE, his epouse should ta made duare of his/and/or her general SSa enticlerants without any reference to the credits accrued curing his UNLANCE service; (4) after 31 Ducerbar 1970, he ray oddress any questions concera- ing SSA credito and entitlenchis to: CROSS RETERENCE TO DISFAIGI STRESS AND NUMBER 1T: A1.5 - 1413 DATE (coirt) 15 JUL 1970 HOS FILE HUWEER INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION - CCS/CTS - WH/FaRSCeN - WH/1 CPB COS/DFB 1 - CCS/DFB GIFILE CCS/OFB THE CE SINGOL CCS/CTS WH/ REAS CPD GRECES: 351 EXT. COORDIMATING 6804: CAtE CATE 13/2/2 53 USE PREVIOUS COITIO'8. DIORATCH --- ## Page 6 1d-0d0d DISPATCH HE1d - 17972 (5) Social Security Idsinistration balticore, darylans 21203 Suca corrispondunce rust, of course, dare no ruference to diLf icE. le should contact the Station if he has iny quaction pertainion t he SSA credits de earned anile under contract to JiLAiCE bistribution: vriy and 1 - COS, lexico City --..- GLASSIFICATION PRECIO 5-99 5.om9 530 USE PREOUS EDITION. Lovindira --- ## Page 7 DISPATCH FEUCESSING ACTION SECRET MAENED FOR DIDEXTEC RAR-O. Chlef of Station. Chief, kH Division FROM Chief of Station. Mexico CIty SUBECT MHSPAWN/LIHUFF/Request of Assistance to Obtain Microfilm Coples of Spanish Documents ACTION REQUIRED - RIFEKENCLS DEO INDEXING REONKED CALY QUALIED DESK CAN JULGE DIDENING MICROFILM Action Required: As Stated An old and proven contact of COS Mexico, L HUFF, has requested assistance to obtain for research purposes microfile coples of the historical Spanish documents contalned in the "Examen Histórico de la Reforma Constitucional que Hicleron las Cortes Generales y Extraordinarlas" (Londres, 1935), by Agustin ARGUELLES. "Apuntes Sobre el Arreglo de los Vocales de Cortes o putado...® (Madrid, 1820 Escritos en la Carcel por el * (Madrid, 1820), by Joaquin Lorenzo VILLANUEVA. C. "Expediente del Proceso a los Dipurados Presos en 1814 en el Archivo de las Cortes Españolas." Archivo reservado dol Congreso de los Diputados. Tomo Xil. Marico City Station would appreclate any assistance the Station can render to obtain the above mentloned microfilm coples. for Willard G. CURTIS Distributions 2 - cos. -/WHD CROSS REFERSICE TO and .. CS COPY DISPATCH SYNAGO, AND NEARER HMMA -37 154 CASINATiON SECRET DATE 15 May 1969 1 50-124-2812 und. --- ## Page 8 1d-0n0d DISPATCH dUSTICATIO SOCIET PROCESIRE ACTION MARKED fOR BOXING NO MOLEING EQUIRCO OMIT QUIIFED DESK CAN JUDGE RADERING MICROFES FROM Chief, i Diviadon Chiof of Station, Mexico City SUBACT ADRIA/ JACEUT LINE - 1901 T0c0T Jar Return ACTION BLOUIRED - REFRINCES Aotlon Requirod: FTI Peference: Hone : 04 Porvardad as a separate cover attachant la a troe copy of the 1067 title U.S. Individual Incoma Tax Heturn for Subjout. Wi lard 6. Curtle Attachment: 1987 Ircora Tar Feturn, U.Soto Distribution: rigE 1- Chief inal, watt u.S.C 2 - Chief kH Div, W/o att CROSS REFERSACE 10 DISPATOR STARDI AND MISSER 104X2-0163 GASSAHCATON SECRET CUREND - DO 102 SENOVE DATE 27 tune 1908 MOS FRE NUMBER 50-1-1/8 --- ## Page 9 TO DISPATCH Chief, Whi Division CLASSIFICATION SECRET xx PROCESSING ACTION MARXED FOR MISERiNG BO INDEN SE PEQUIRED ONLY QUALIFIED DESA ICAM JUDGE INDEX IN MICROFILM FROM Chief of Station, Mexico City SUBJECT Agent Evaluation - LIHUFF/I Of LIHUFF Project ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES by millard a cached on coples or a enur luaten written 2. This is forwarded for Headquarters information and records. - Willard C. CURTIS ittachment: Agent Evaluation 13 cys = inter to atsmatic • 1.21691 Distribution: 3 - C/WH, wlat CROSS REFERENCE TO OISPATCH SYUBOL ARO NUMBER HMMA - 32878 GCLASSIFICATION SECRET 50-124-28 DATE LIHUFE/SUP. 29 August 1967 HOS FILE NUMBER 201-30999 --- ## Page 10 SECRET AGENT EVALUATION 24 August 1967 1. Nane (P): LIHUFF/8 2. Project & LIHUFF 3. Overt Job Title: Manager of Large Association. 4. Covert Job Title: Contract Agent. i Job Description & LIHUFF/l-Is a contract agent who Is in touch with and reports on a right wing student organization and Its activitles. He also reports on a Mexican organization which sponsors the publication of a right wing economics (monthly) Journal: he has contact with a sub-agent (LICHANT/ who is employed by both the Ministry of Education and the Mexican Soclal Securlty Institute. addition, he is able by virtue of his overt employment, to get Dun and Bradstreet credit and other checks on business firms. American, Mexican and others. is In contact with other right wing organizations and Indlviduals and has lood contacts with Catholic Church authoritles in MeXiCO. 6. Evaluations a Performance of Above Duties without Prejudice to Elther One. only part- excellent cover for the work he doas for woract. bo Attitude towards WOFACT, Cover Organization and Present Assignment. LIHUFF/ Is a great admirer of WOFACT. He Is anx lous to do any asslanment given him: he ls grateful for the extra income (although small) which the WOFACT job gives him.. He Is very leased with his present assignment, loves workin or his cover organ zation. C . Security and Discretion. LIHUFF/I has had years of work of the WOFACT cape i, in chinas has been Ho did the same type of work during world assoclated: with WOFACT under unfeel ever one contrace status Jand In Mexico. He Is very security= consclous and discreet about his assoclation with WOFACT and about his work with this organization. SEGRET UHUFF/SUP --- ## Page 11 ..... SECRET do Handling. LIHUFF/ has presented no problems to the Station. le accepts guldance and Instructlons, is anxious te do whatever Is asked of him. He takes about one hour weekly to handle. Thore have been no excessive administrative demands generated by this agent. Report Writing. LIHUFF/I generally submits reports which he has acquired fron elther LIHUFF/2 or LICHANT/18 0r, he writes brlef memorande on data he belleves of Interest. he makes coples of the dun & Gradstreet reports or simllar ones he delivers to the Station. His reporting is good, thorough, but brief and to the point. f. Personal Attributes. tlos in Mexicos he Is very well Ilked and respected all typest Mexican Businessmens and he gets along wall with His family plays no role in his WOFACT aceivlties. 8. Performance in Mis Specifie Job. LIHUFF/I porforms woll In his speelfle Job. He gives the station no probleas, elther administra tively or otherise. Mis performance could be rated as Strong. h. Noteworthy Weaknesses. This agent has no noteworthy weaknesses. In vie lo Career Developmental Possibilitles. This agent could adjust well in any Spanish- speaking country. J. Comments Not Covered by Above Headings None. Signature of Rating Officer eard (Custo Tard Go CURTT: Signature of Revlewing Officer Arcane Casti SECRET 1316631 arounds ride sanitatitan. --- ## Page 12 DISPATCH CLASS, CATION _SECRET Chief. L'OGAlE aFaL Chief. VH Division Chief of Station. Mexico City SUBJECT JECENT/LIHUFF/1 - 1966 Tax Return ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES Reference: A. HHMS-5094, 16 Dec 66 HISMT -5750, 9 Feb 67 BARRED I OR IDEANO GO INDEXING RECUURED CELY CURLIFIED LES CAH JUOGE INDERING MICROFILN Forwarded unde 956 (overtly submitted, separatecome fax Retuerax copy of Subject". 2. This is being submitted in response to Reference A. Willard 6. CURTIS Attachment: (u/s/c) 1966 Tax Return Distribution: 2 - C/WOGATE, w/ate (8 cy) t'= G/WH, w/o att 6.008000a.33 CROSS REFERENCE TO DISPATCH SYHOOL AND BUMBER HMMT- 8008 CLASS,FICATION SECRET 7751"1| DATE 22 June 1967 • ROS FILE NUMBER «TWO D --- ## Page 13 DISPATCH CLASSIFICATION SECRET NFO. Chlef of Station, Mexico City FROM Chief, Wi Division SUBJECT O LIFE Studert Substay ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES References: A. WWW 14500, 18 Ajr1l 1966, Paragraph 4 B. IRSiA 28835, 4 lay 1966, Paragraph 3 с. НУТ 6507, 3 May 1966 HIT 7147, 13 September 1966 B. IMT 7197, 4 October 1966 FPOCESSING ACHIO! MADRED FOR MIDERIO INS ROEXISO REQUIRED ELY QUALIFIED DESE CID LOGE MEDEXIO ESCROF ELM 1. In response to Reference A, the Station notified Headquarters In Reference B that the $500 monthly subsidy to the LIur student creanization vould cease as of 30 April 1906. leedguarters believed chet the Apil subsloy payment reported in Reference o and cherred to Project LIRANCH vas to be the last payment. The post recent reneval requests for Projects LIHUFF and LILISP-X do not contain provicions for this subsidy. Headquarters vas under the Impression that the subsidy would not be continued and would appre- Kenneth B. TRABOVT Distribution: 2 - COS, Mexico City CROSS REFEREICE TO &S COPY RI Chrono 362 LEST 5025 Foes 53 USE PREVIGUE CONSON I DISPATCH SYMBOL NEO MUMBER Eat - 3031 CLASSIFICATION SECRET OFFICE WE/1 OFFICE SYMBOL - = 191 S OFFICE SYMBOL OFFICER: SODATE TAED 1 из ун.0e CATE 1201 • DATE 50-134-2812 28 NOV 1955 MOS FIL i Dovember 1966 50-124-28/3 ORIGINATING TYPIST [EXT. 3654 COORDINATING OFFER'S NAISE RELEASING --- ## Page 14 14-00000 SECRET 6 September 1966 MEMORANDUM POR: Chief, CCS FROM SULJECT : WH Division : Project Funding Plan/Pro:ect LIEUTE (PI) A. Iuentification of Actlulty 1. Project cryptonya: LIHUrT 2. Approved for: 1 July 1965 - 30 June 1566: $1, 200 FY 1967 - $4,200 3. Proposed successive flocal your budget: Same 4. Bered utatement os project ains, character and The purpose of this project is to provide support to a U. S. Contract Agent who has access to night-wing political leaders and organizatione in Mexico. This agent is handled directly by a Station Case Officer. B. Funding Bistory 1. The Contract Agent recelves a monthly Balar, of $300 plus his opcrational expenses directl fros the Station Case Officer. 2. Funda have algays been handled in this manner. -009 them a more i an one go out is • : --- ## Page 15 1d-0d0d TO INFO. FROM DISPATCHI CLASSIFICATION SECRET PROCESSING ACTION MARKED FOR INDEXING Chief, WHD xX NO INDEXING REQUIRED ONLY QUALIFIED DES AN JUDGE INDEXIN Chief en station. Mexicacide Afirmacion Revolux maria (FCMAR) ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES REFERENCE: HMMA-24542, 20 October 1964 1. In reference the Station Indicated that unless reference Identity D the succeeded In galning an important ministerlal post in new Diaz Ordaz government, the beneflts to be derlved from the Cecil B. ARLISS-reference Identity B contact (l.e.. a continuing indirect connection with the frente Civico and Incidentlal information reports) would not be of sufficient value to warrant continuation of the contact. To date, as far as the Station is aware, reference Identity D has not been appointed to any Cabinet lal position. Further, there Is no indication that former President Aleman Intends to reactivate the frente Civico into a movement which would be of MHSPAWN interest at this juncture. ARLISS has accordingly been instructed to phase out the contact with reterence Identity B and the Frente Civico upor his return from his U.S. trip In January 1965. Before lois departure ARLISS gave reference Identity B an advance of 4000 pesos to cover the two regular monthly payments of 2000 pesos December 1964 and proceed to close out the contact as expeditlously as for Willard G. CURTIS Distribution: • WHD 2 - Files CROSS REFERENCE 10 1110F5 DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER H4A-2503 ASSIFICATIO SECREI DATE 50-126-112 si tryi --- ## Page 16 14-00000 DISPATCH CLASSIFICATICN SECRET PROCESSING ACTION MARKED FOR INDEXINO 10 Chief of Station, Mexico City iNFO. NO INDEXING REQUIRED ONLY QUALIFIED DESE CAN JUDGE INDEXING FROM Chief, WH Divigion MICROFILA SUBJECT LIHUFF Projcct ACTION RFQUIRER - REFERENTES REF: DIR 96033 DIR 99160 The level and the scope of authorized charges to LILIßPY for LIEUFF activities for the balance of FY64 were provided to you In Ref B. The Station should adhere rigidly to the limitations on LIHUFF's salary and the support for student activities. Should you wish to support other specific projects under LIHUFF activity such as the book to be published in Buenos Aires, your recommendations in this respect will be considered by Headquorters on a:rage to case basis. As also Indicated in Ref B, Headquarterg has allocated an additional $30,000 to Project LILISP-S for FY bringing the total to $82500. This additional allotment will have to be documented and the Station is asked to submit its comments which can be used in support of it. 3. The Station is also requested to submit to Headquarters, not later than 1 June 1964. nn up-dated assessment of the LIHUFF operation. If at that time the Station wishes to present a revised project for fiscal ycar 1965, your recommendations should be submitted with the reassessment. If your recommendations are accepted, Headquarters will then undertake to rewrite the project outline forwarded with EMA-20931 and submit the Project for approval. Oliver G. GALBOND CROSS REFERENCE TO Distribution: 0&]-COS, Mexico City COPA DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER FANY 12379 CLASSIFICATION SECRET OFFICE WH/3/Mexico Postribut Jon: Is --F-RI 1 Chrono OFFICE SYMBOL DATE 50-184-3879 DATE 2 March 1964 HOS FILE NUMBER 50124-28/3 COORDINATING EXT. 5940 OFFICER'S NASIE WH3/REX rea* 53 USE PREVIOUSFDITION OFFICE SYMSOL C/WHD DATE 146: RELEASING OFFICERS SIGGUATURE ICDATCH indians iden ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10192-10122.pdf
104-10192-10122
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
04/23/1964
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR FBI
DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR PLANS
MEMORANDUM: SUBJECT - ROBIN MOORE
1
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK64-27 : F2 : 20040310-1056521 :
1
## Page 1 104-10192-10122 RETURNTO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce 11 TrEBOr Do D. Duated J RON :Deputy Mirector or lane SUDJECT: BODIE MOORE Interence la race to your amoratis tated CubaE" (IMa ROVOlUTIONiTY 'NEtS) (JU?)," Your 8110 IT OILIN сото Jus. -08 24 has reported tsat lie totalion baos of alriya BUllA unro nor aparteral vas ralcod bo the danaican police. 3. 11l0g of thie mencY ontaia the inioration chit BaRIB Lo a budding Sa 84550 1024818 y348 006-17008 CaC: 9/781.003 : de Dintribution: OrdE. did rottere 1: 11 ( 103-2-513) CILIA 1C 108 2645007 79 DIlL 1984 DASIC: WIRA 330 9 AprIl 1904 XiD ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10109-10249.pdf
104-10109-10249
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
12/23/1959
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
WITHHELD
DIRECTOR
CABLE RE ARTIME TRAVEL PLANS
1
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK40 : F7A : 1997.06.28.13:37:51:543031 :
1
## Page 1 104-10109-10249 ORIG : UNIT • EXT DATE : TO FROM: CONF: INFO : #+90-088801 WH/III/CARIBBEAN 3623 23 DECEMBER 1959 MEXICO CITY) 16-3 DIRECTOR WH 5 C1, CI/OPS, C1/0A, Os 2, s/C 2 CLASSIFIED MESSAGE 3 TO DEFERRED Ell PRUNING 5 2108.38 6 7: 213 ROUTINE INITIALS PRIORITY INITIALS OPERATIONAL IMMEDIATE 47346 CITE DIR RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do NOl Reproduce [MEXI]213 INFO HAVA (PRIORITY) HER: DIR-07506 (007-7655267 1. ARTINE ETA MEXI 1845 MEXI TIME 23 DEC VIA EAL FLIGHT 305. 21-32. WILI ATTENTI OBE IN POON PRADO HOPEL, NÂTE ICE ECSTAGE PET MEXI]÷811 BEGINING 1400 HOURS 24 DEC. IF UNABIE DIADI ROQI AN PIDO TREE LEAVE WORD WHERE STAYING AND AVAIT COITACT PER SAS PLAT (END OF MESSAGE) WE Conment: *Ref says is vill aüvise devi when Aitice aM! leon. WE/III/Mexi Of/SSD/ucCrew by shone) COORDINATING OFFICERS S-I-C-R-L-T REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. 31BR ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10100-10334.pdf
104-10100-10334
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
11/1/63
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
MEXICO CITY
DIRECTOR
TRAVEL AUTHORIZED
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK33 : F6 : 20040108-1032354 :
1
## Page 1 104-10100-10334 HEDO Cora 16346 TASTEN 102210 CITE CIR 79937 MIKE MOO 6700 (IN 49319)- Background Do Not Reproduce 1. FREAPUKE TRAVEL AUREL TIED WITH STOPOVER NI ORTEARS. PERAPANE •BLIMAT SITA SENDERMEY TIN ESTO SINA CIONE 2. RIS PARA PARER RIS LAPLANTER CARE OPTICIA AVAILANCE NEI MRAPAVE CHICAGO ON 19 JAWARY DESCUSS WAY APPAGICE TLWTER CHANTIN AND MUTUALES AGNES ON OBJECEIVES. 3• EDS HIT TEL CET HE UPON SICKOT SUATECT'S TRAVE Mational Catholio 0A/D/3 - WH/CA rast) (mare) holate 1920/3 COOLOMATO ORACLAY REPRODUCTIONS OTHER TAN THE ISSUING CUICE IS PROHIBITEC 415836 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10234-10000.pdf
104-10234-10000
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
03/14/1966
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
WITHHELD
12 MARCH LA REPUBLICA PUBLISHED ARTICLE BY CAZALIS ENTITLED "UNA NACION DE AGENTES DE LA CIA".
1
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK64-51 : F8 : 1998.05.31.07:47:25:200107 :
1
## Page 1 104-10234-10000 ₽ '7- 108.95 1610H7 =estãor D sie. SECRET •iTi 1 189. ELE VIE CUES WH 8 CA/AR CA2 EE6 SECRET 141SSUL DIR FRAN MEXI PARI INFO #AVE GMNY CITE CARA 3832 TYPIC ANKAISER REF: FRAN 1585 SRA & (N54815) * 1 4la66 71525 12 MARCH LA REPUBLICA PUBLISHED ARTICLE BY CAZALIS ENTITLED "UNA NACION DE AGENTES DE LA CIA: EL COMANDANTE SORI MARIN, EL COMANDANTE MORGAN, EL COMANDANTE ORDOQUI Y EL COMANDANTE CUBELA"* AIRMAILING CLIP DIR MEXI PARI WAVE. POUCHING FRAN SECRET CFN 3832 1585 PARA 4 12 LA REPUBLICA CAZALIS UNA NACION DE AGENTES DE LA CIA EL COMANDANTE SORI MARIN MORGAN ORDOQUI Y EL CUBELA BT #REf CABLE 16665 15 NNNN Amlack-i ---
2,018
/releases/2018
180-10112-10466.pdf
180-10112-10466
04/26/2018
4/17/2018
HSCA
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
null
NUMBERED FILES
3/12/18
null
## Page 1 1800-10112-10466° JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 10/13/20 - AGENCY: HSCA RECORD NUMBER: 180-10112-10466 RECORD SERIES: NUMBERED FILES AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 015106 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FROM: TO: TITLE: CIA DATE: PAGES: SUBJECTS : 06/25/1976 25 ANTI-CASTRO ACTIVITIES STURGIS, FRANK, BACKGROUND CIA, INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT TYPE: NOTES CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified RESTRICTIONS: 3 CURRENT STATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 01/01/2003 OPENING CRITERIA: COMMENTS: NOTES FROM 6-25-76 - 9/21/77. BOX 296. wH 30955 DocId: 32264840 Page 1 --- ## Page 2 Fonzi Notes - call from Frank Sturgis 6/25/76 He just ran across a friend of his who used to be an agent, in communications, and a he "revived" his mind on something that he "completely had lost forgot." He had previously told me that he almost all his notes from his adventures in the intelligence business, which explains why he hadn't remembered this before. He reminded me he told me that he had been sent to washington by a group of key men in Castro's inner circle and told to give some secret documents and lists of names to Hoover, personally. (Sturgis didn't tell me this, but Pedro Diaz-Lanz -- the guy who came out with Sturgis and was head of Castro's Air Force -- told someone the list contained the names of Cuban exile double agents. At the top of the list, says Diaz-Lanz, was Artime's name. ) sturgis says he never did get to see Hoover but he did see his personal secretary. He says he was sent to Hoover directly because the insiders didn't trust the. American Embassy. He believes the Rockefeller Commission and the Watergate Commission has testimony from his about plots agamast Castro, but he couldn't get an OK to assassinate pa*s Castro because of the Eisenhower administration. One of the people that Sturgis says he was in touch with here, besides *hadia tbe ClA, was Tarabochia. He was in touch with Tarabbohia at this particular time, and therefore Tarabochia would know of this incident: There was a meeting in Cuba bout two, two and half months before the Kennedy assassination. There were a number.of high-rakking rebel officers present: Ee Fidel, Raul, Che, ¡the chief of G2 (can't remember his name), a man who was called "El Mexicano, " several other people, a woman...and Jack Ruby. The meeting was in Havana. One of the rebel officers present was sa half-brother at of a Cuban exile living in Miami. After the JFK assassination, the officer sent a letter to his half brother telling of the meeting, the discussion to assassinate JFK and the presence of Jack Ruby. He smuggled the letter out, probably ithhough Mexico. The deal was that Castro would supply Ruby with a flow of drugs. Ruby would get the money to buy the drugs by being given the winning number in the bolito drawing. That's how Ruby would be paid off.. When Cuban exile got letter some ClA agents found out about it, but "before they could get it from him, in Miami and he turned over the letter to agents from the Miami: FBI office. ro to control tre i re made contact with the FBl here They advised him that it was a very delicate situation and not tell anyone about it. NH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 2 Sturgis doesn't know name of Cuban exile, but he worked. in a factory in. Miami or Hialeah. He's going to try to find out, he's checking on it now. The friend he ran into, the guy with the company, was the one who told him Tarabochia had this information. the background is this: Ruby had gone to Cuba many times and while he was there he was trying to get some action "McWillie was friend of his, as you know." (NOTE: In interview with Canfield in Coup d'fat sturgis has a tough time remembering who McWillie is page 243). This is where Ruby probably thought a up the idea of making a deal with Castro. "We all know he had criminal connections." There should be some record of his trip through the American Embassy in Mexico City of his trip to cuba through there. "But this could have been a secret ten trip he went on, on the other hand, if he was involved an in an assassination." He doesn't know how long after the assassination the Cuban exile got the letter from his half-brother. (l/. probably.came Sturgis: "This man here like to had a shit hemorrhage." (Coincidence?: From Robert Morrow's Betrayal: "Not to be vulgar," I thought aloud, "but he'll have a shit hemorrhage." Morrow speaking of Castro's reaction to his counterféét operation. d (1 asked him about Crile's piece in the Wash. Post re the Castro- Trafficante relationship) sturgis says that's news to him. But he doesn't believe it because Castro kicked out the mob and Lansky and Trafficante lost their casinos. told Santos one day, I said, 'Santos, I: just ***xa left a meeting with Castro and he ordered me to close down the casinos for 10 days.". And he did. Sturgis was put in charge of casinos for a while by fastro. Sturgis believes if that was the case, that would make Aleman an agent for Castro also. But if he did make contact with Trafficante it was through Rolando Martinez, because he knew Trafficante very well, he used to work for the Havana Hilton, so he knows all. ** the mob people, "He knows them as well as l do." Aleman and Martinez are xaXxa*ia very close friends. Barker got fired from the ClA because of his connections with the racket people. NH 5095J/ DocId:32264810 Page 3 --- ## Page 4 Sturgis - 6/30/76 = tatel --says: Tarabochia should remember Castro-Ruby incident because "I know thellA agent, or former agent, who told him about it.". -thinks the woman he mentioned as being at the meeting was Tanya, Che's secretary who was killed witth him Bolivia.. -also trying to get name of Cuban exile in Miami who received the letter =-his ex-ClA friend spoke to. Tarabochia. about it at the time and perhaps Tarabochia wa should have it on record. ...it should alsok be part.of the FBl files in Washington, along with the original letter... -ClA should have a report in too, "We sent the report in." *** --re Cellula Fantasma: (Was that Company operation or Naval Intelligence operation?, "No, Company operation." The people who were involved, in that were Dr. Louis Conte-Aguerra (sp?); he asked my assistance and l went to see my CO, who was Sam Jenis. Conte-Aguerra was associated with the Company and they came to me because they knew I was about the a only one who could do successful air operations. So they asked me if I would do a series of five air operations and I said, certainly, I would... cre l heard of the relationship ax of Jukio Lobo and his anti-Castro activity. I understand Bill Attwood went down to interview him and... "Well, Bill was with the Company. No, wait a minute, wait a minute.. Attwood, Attwood... forget... l think he was the company... I'm not sure offhand...l didn't know all the agents." (Wasnit it Rojas in charge of Cellula Fantasma?) Conte-Aquerra was the big man on it. He's the one who arranged for the financing for the people that I would do the operation for. As a matter of fact, I went on three of them myself..l couldn't get the Cubans to do it sol used Americans. One of the pidots •was Bill Johnson..) (What was Rojas' role?) I didn't fool around with. Rojas. You know, there was a movement within ClA which told Conte-Aquerra that he was going to be a big official in the new government.. And many of the agents who were also going to get positions went along with the idea that Conte Aquerra would be the president of the new Cuba. And he was being financed through his own ClA contacts to do a series of these operations (How does Lobo fit in?) Well, Julio gave money. He was working also with ClA. money which he was taking off income tax and so forth. This was the way what you'd call 'washigg" money. This is how ClA would wash money through different Cuban business people--and American businessmen--which wouldn't lead directly to the ClA. Julio Lobo was one of the people. NW 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 1 --- ## Page 5 (Were you dealing with him much?) Well, I worked with him, but I wasn't dealing directly with him because he wasn't connected with a the s people 1 was associated with. He was more with the economic section, you know, that certain officials dealt with. (You met him here in Miami or Havana?) In Havana. But I didn't have any & dealings with him because, you know, certain people worked with certain people. It was the thing that you call compartmentation, you know. They dealt with didferent people in different ways.. Just like Tony Verona. He was a ClA agent. He not only was one of the leaders, he was an agent per se. And even today Manolo Artime is still an agent. He wasn't then but he is today. He's still with them.: You know he was the civil coordinator between the Revolutionary Junta and the Bay of Pigs..: (mentioned Gerald Shamma and her Artime story) Heh heh bah, she told you that story, eh. I wish she hadn't told you that sodry, heh heh heh. Artime: "When he came back from Cuba, they made him a businessman, they made him a very wealthy man. I think he's got a little problem with Semoza now, but he was working closely with him. **But if you're with the right people they don't give a shit what you did, as long as they control you. The ClA got some shits of the world working for them. The Agency slammed the door on all four of us when we got out of prison. Colby sent orders out to all stations not to talk to us or have any contact with us. But it makes no **difference to me, if I need to get to them I go through other people.. But, hey, that's the name of the game, I guess. When you get into the big league stuff with the powefaul people up in Washington or Langley, if the wrong group of people are in control and you're not in that league, they can hurt you. And right now the wrong group is up there. Have been since Colby's been up there. Colby's got his own people and l'm not one of them." (Looks like they're getting ready to hang & Lucien Conein, Well, you know, Howard knew him very well. Evidentally, he's been involved in some things and they don't want to let it come out. But there's a lot of shit Colby has been involved in and he comes out smedling like a rose" Evidentally, he [Conein] is in band bad with the wrong people. Colby cleaned house and put his own people in theeean and what they do is use people for sacrificial lambs... like they did us in Watergate... to take the heat off of them.. Howard himself didn't realize that he was used and we in turn worked with Howard and they buried all of us.. •HH 50955. DocId: 32264840 Page --- ## Page 6 3 But like I told you before, Bennett was the man who really did a number on the President. (Bennett of Mullens Co.) And though they closed house and withdrew all the agent that were overseas working for the & Mullens Co, they re-opened a new company and had to re-do the agents with the new company... l curious to find out where Bennett is right now. (Howard Hughes connection) Oh yeah, they used him.. They let him make a lot of money: There's still a lot of places down here especially that are still ClA fronts... -remembered also that Castro's G2 at meeting name wasR Romero Valez... HH 50955: DocId: 32264840 Page --- ## Page 7 -notes--call from Frank Sturgis 7/28/76 -tatel -said he wasn' surprised by the Schweiker announcement of running with "I think schweiker's using this thing, but, hey, you can't blame him, he's a politician. The thing worked out beautifully he asked: "Is he still officially investigating the JFK thing?" I said, yes, he was still interested. After a few minutes of inconsequential conversation, he asked again: "Hey, let me ask you something. Are you still checking up on the JFK thing?" I said, yes, l was. Then he said: "I told you about that letter from Cuba, didn't 1?" I said we as had checked up on it and that we had gotten a Tarabochia about it but the memo said nothing although it did mention a trip to Cuba by Ruby. He asked did the report mention about the letter that came to the relative in Miami, he said his friend "Salvatore" Ithe former ClA man] told him definitely there was a ** letter and that "Bob Dwyer probably was the man [the FBI agent], because: he was in charge of the Cuban desk at the Bureau downtown, was probably one of the agents who picked up the letter." I told him that Tarabochia's memo indicated only that Ruby went to Cuba, not that he had seen Castro, and that the FBl man was James D'Oonnor, not Dwyer. Sturgis asked how we got a copy of that memo and I told him I didn't know. He implied that perhaps it was changed or censured and I said that was possible. for all l knew, because I had never seen the original. He then said that Ruby could have been to Cuba without people knowing it, of course. Sturgis then asked me if I o had ever heard of lyle Stuart. said yes. he's the ax book ax publisher who has published a lot of sensational and controversial books. "You know he supposedly met Oswald a month before Kennedy was assassinated in Miami, accordäng to a report There's supposed to be something in the newspapers in 1963 before Kennedy was killed about Oswald being in Miami, Sturgis said, and he is going to the library to check up on that. Lyle stuartit was also says sturgis, was head of the Fair Play for Cuba committee. reported he was very pro-Castro and that Castro was supporting him financially and that Lyle Stuart was seen with and connected with Oswald. And it was reported in the papers that Oswald was here a month before the assassiaation. NOw it may all be bullshit but l'm still going to check it out." sturgis said the man who told him this was a writer who was "pretty much involved" in the investigation of the assassination. He was last night, and the guy said that lyle Stuart would be the one to check with. The guy's name is Bob Traflins. "I did ask him& if it would be alright for him to talk with you." At this time sturgis went to get Trainins phone number and in the background I could hear the television news which - coincidentally.- happened just then to announce the news of Howard Hunt filing the $2-1/2 million libel suit against Weberman & Canfield. "Did. you hear that?" Sturgis asked, just to make sure. MH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 7 --- ## Page 8 2 "What Ellis is doing," said sturgis, "is to file Howard's now and then by the we end of the week or next week he's filing mine. Both Howard and myself are using Ellis. " [Ellis Rubin, local controversial attorney is most known in Miami for his publicity ploys and long-standing feud with. State Attorney (Dade. co.) Richard Gerstein. Sturgis said the suit dad would be against the authors and publisher of Coup D'Etat and against Playboy. and Hefner and later maybe against Dick Gregory ("As soon as I dig up enough about him. ": I said libel suits are tough to win. "Yeah, but hey," said Sturgis ISt. George was right: he says "but hey" a loth, even if we get a judgment for a dollar it'll stop all the shit about us being involved in the the assassination of John F. Kennedy." He asked if I had a chance to. that letter. speak with the Cuban who received I said no, l haven't had a chance because as a result of his television appearances Wally. Weston had come forth with his information and I had been busy on that. "I spoke to Wally Weston tonight," said Sturgis, "and I have a meeting to sit down and find out what he can tell me and so forth." Back on Oswald's meeting with Lyle Stuart, Sturgis said he thinks it may have been possible because there was a report that he himself had met Oswald in Miami and that could have been very possible, what with all the anti-castro people he met and the double-agents, but he himself didn't remember it. But he did hear that Stuart was connected with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee and getting financial assistance from Cuba. "This Bob Tralins was a friend of his and dislikes the man very much, but: he definitely told me this." Switching subjects, I asked him what he knew about operations that took place from Cay Sal island. [the Hughes connection.] Afl he knew, he said, that there was a black Customs official who tried to keep people off the island because the ClA used it as a stepping stone, like a "listening post": off the coast of Cuba. He himself didn't have any operations from there. "On some .of.. the island close by there we stopped by occasionally for several houss, but I kept away from Cay Sal by other people, other aroups." because it was being operated "They were ClA operations. C???] Was it Clavor other opegators? One time Barker got a hold of me because was doing something, in some operations with Bill Johnson which was financing, and Barker got a hold of me and said, 'Hey, we're doing something very sensitive that area' and he asked me to stop for a while and go into another area." [Note: This is obviously conflicting: Who was Sturgis working for if not ClA? Here he became very deliberately convoluting and wound up talking about pinar de Rio operations in Cuba. J I asked him if he was involved in the training camp in New Orleans with Gus DeLabarre and Rudodph Davis: "No," he said at all. I never knew about any quickly. "Not training camp in Dallas. New Orleans." ENOTE: WHO SAID ANYTHINO ABOUT DALLAS???' DI HH. 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 8 --- ## Page 9 3 l asked him about the guy who was reportedly the head ClA man here, Mr. B, or Bender or his supposedly "real" name, Drescher, and what he looked like. "Oh, I don't know," he said. mean I never met him. You've got to understand the agents didn't talk to the contract employees, but there would just be a telephone system of reporting. The telephones were connected by relays so that if the FBl were checking the number it would be located in one area but it would just be a relay station, so they could never check it down." Sturgis talked then about Schweiker and the Reagon situation and I said I thought they would have a tough fight on their hands against Ford who, after all, has all the power. "1 disagree with you, " said sturgis. "1 think the power is up there and they're advising him what to do. He's being controlled, like all Presidents are. Certain power groups control, you know what I mean?" He changed the subject and mentioned he had been out in California last week. He said he was invited out by Chuck Ashman La former Miamian who has a radio or TV talk show out there and has wiitten some exploitation books about the Mafia and the cla]. Sturgis said he has Oscar Fraley i Cauthor of "The Untouchables") who wants to do the story of his life. EFraley's latest book is on Jimmy Hoffal. He said he has been trying to get a hold of his ex-agent friend (Salvatore) who told him about the Ruby in Havana story to get more information but the quy is in the Domican Republic for the week. Sturgis then asked if it were possible to get a copy of the Tarabochia memo and I said l would check on that with my office. The conversation got back on the ClA: "The ClA is very funny," he said. "They do things right up to a point and then they turn right around and screw you. Depending what their policy is; lf they want to change it they'll change it and bury your ass 700.:"In the last few years they've had their own internal, power struggle and in that struggle a lot of people sa get hurt who are decent people. Like if I favor Howard Hunt and his boss gets whacked out. then everybody down the line goes. That could go into hundreds or couple thousand people. Just like when Helms left. I told you that Nixon wanted some files from Helms and Helms wouldn't give it to him; so the president fired him. Now I'm assuming..from my discussions with certain ClA officials fired now. the files he wanted pertained to the Bay of Pigs and also the JFK assassination. And Helms didn't to turn them over. He was scared that if he turned it over to the President, that Maldeman and Erlichman would have used it for political reasons. And after Helms was fired McCord turned aax around and said, 'If Helms goes, all the trees in the forest will fall!' That's why McCord blew the NW 50955 Doold:32264840 Page 9 --- ## Page 10 4 whistle on the President. Well, you know who Deep Throat was, don't you? I think Helms ordered Bennett to bury Nixon. Deep Throat was probably several guys, but the main man was Bennett, the ClA man. Unfortunately poor Howard got sucked into this thing, I don't think he even knew anything about it. And Bennett was his boss, both at the Mullen company and I suspect, his ClA chief also. Oh yeah, I believe certain ClA officials, Helms the major one, set up Nixon to be caught. And the company's hot at me because I told all this to the Rockefeller and the Senate Watergate committees. But fuck'em, they screwed me enough all these years. Maybe Schweiker will get to be the Vice President and j'11 get him to get me into ClA and 1'1l clean that place up myself..." And on that note.... ## 50955 DooId: 32264840 Page 10 --- ## Page 11 -Notes -- call from Frank Sturgis wl Ed Keiser. 8/2/76 tatel Says he's at a friend's house and this friend just came back from Israel. He was in one of the big notorious prisons over there, Pomley (sp?) prison outside Tel Aviv, the top security prison where all the major captured terrorists are locked up.. ... his friend is very much in with the American dews in this area and he had gone to Israel with the idea of trying to help Israel as an undercover agent, to help infiltrate the He did that and came back with a lot of information. sturgis told him. he would try to get someone to talk with him because he feels there is much information his friend has that our government should be avare of, since he made friends and has lot of connections now with the terrorist leaders in prison. He put himself in prison with. the knowledge of Israeli Intellengence. "This guy has worked for me in the past and he's worked as an undercover agent for several federal agencies. He used to be with the French Foreign Legion, the guy is really a hot-shot guy. " --Name is Edwin Keiser . sturgis said he thought I might find this guy's story of interest. "Whether it can be of any help to you or schweiker, I don't know. After all, your boy is running for politics now. " I said I didn't know whether Schweiker would be interested in that information since it's really outside our subject area. "You never can tell," said Sturgis, "you know how politicians are. If they think there's a little bit of something that they might be able. to use and Schweiker, I don't know what a kind of religious background he's got but that sounds. Jewish anyway." I said wasn't interested in the political aspects of any kind of intelligence information and /didn't think schwiker.was either. "Well, why don't you just say hello to my friend here anyway, 1: said Sturgis. "He's got an interesting backgoound, l've known him for a number of years and he's good to know. "Hell, Frank," I said, "isn't there anybody you don't know?" iSturgis laughed and said, "Well, there were some people I swear l didn't know and l'd like to keep it that way. Ha, ha, ha, you know, one of those things." Ed Keiser got on the phone and said that his problem was that the American Embassy in Israel, specifically the vice consul (whose name is John Adams and who is, in fact, chief of the ClA station), told him That when he: Keiser, returned to the l.s. he would be in touch with certain people and now he found that no one wants to talk with him, because technically he's under arrest for having left this country with a xasxe falsified passport. He says he had lost his citizenship back in the mid-50's, without his knowledge of losing it, when ate he joined the kraa French Foreign Legion. He says it was taken away without a hearing or trial and he has since found out that shouldn't have been done.: . He says, however, he has never stopped fighting Communism and he has been out of the country several times since then on false passports. NH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 11 --- ## Page 12 2 This last time he went to Israel he went on a forged passport and after a month and a half he gave himself up and agreed to work undercover in the prison for the Israeli government. He was in Romley prison for five and a half months, including with the 43 people they wanted to exchange on the hijacking program in Uganda, all the top-ranking terrorists. He ked left in good standing with these terrorists, including the six jews and 30 Arabs who had plotted to take over the Israeli government who had come in out of Syria. He dame back to the U.s. to be prosecuted, paroled to this country by the Israeli government an an Ra Israeli. 'I brought back quite a bit of information with me," he said. For instance, he said, he was in prison with an American. whose father is very big man in the California movie business. The son was arrested for smuggling a half a ton of hashish, and his family is dealing heavily here in the States and in south America with cocaine and other drugs... The Federal agents he's xxx tried to talk with said they can't talk with him because he's under arrest aar (for false use of a passport and his case is not resolved. "It's really stupid," he says. "I'm carrying information around with me, I supposed to be in contact with intelligence over there and carry on with what l was doing, and I can't even talk with people in my own coumtry to see if they want me to continee.: He was arrested by FBI here after he arrived at kennedy airport after being deported by Israel. They put a $25,000 bond on x him in New York and another $25,000 bond in Miami. They a brought him here for prosecution because here's where he falsified the passport. Me sags he was also subpoenaed to Watergate when Frank was involved andihe brought up information that could have really helped Frank, the information was taken but nothing was done. •"It was really a sad thing,' he said. " think it was just used politically.. I had agents in Cuba that were coming out of Havana who were willing to come here and testify, but the Senate wouldn't send a PBY or couldn't get authorization to pick them up. This all went to Howard Baker and his assistant Liebenaood and they didn't do anything. I have but one life to live and I'll give it to my country, but l felt sour about that.. He said he was working with the Cubars here in Miami for a while after Watergate but he decided to go to Israel and fight Communish there "because those people are serious." He says he effectively infiltrated the terrorist and communist groups within Israel prisons and he brought out important information but now "it seems like my own country could care less about it." He says he'd like to get the information primarily to: the ClA, especially stuff about the & PLO. He says he has pages of information which, "if he dropped on the United Nations "would blow the lid off.": He wouldn't do that, of course, without the authorization of his government; "But I'm sitting on a g keg of dynamite here and I don't know why my government is not. at least talking with me... If they want to put me jal!, put me jail, but at least first talk to me." NN 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 12 --- ## Page 13 3 He says his wife put up their house to raise money for his bond. He says. he's being represented by a public defender because he cant afford an attorney: Edward G. Galante (305-350-4391) He says he talked to people from DEA who say they're interested in what I got and to head of intelligence of U.s. Customs (Steve Czukos) here in South Florida == but they all put him off and he hasn't heard from any of them. --meanwhile, he says he is supposed to get back in touch aäk with Israeli intelligence, he has a code and it was should have been started a week ago, but he doesn't want to start it up again without making our government aware of what he is going. He says he also has agents with the PLO who are waiting now in Rome for him and he has been putting that off too. He says his attorney is talking about making a deal with the government but he's not interested, he's interested only in getting out the information he has... "I think that the information l have has something to do with the security of this nation, because it has something to do with the security of Israel." He says just the information he has on drugs alone is valuable. The guy he met in prison who was busted with a half tone of hash should be out in two or three weeks and he's on be his way back to California with a conspiracy he put together in the Israeli prison.. Keiser says he's got knowledge of how drugs are coming in, who's arranging for them, and who is carrying them. He says the DEA told him they are interested but because he is still on charges and has a court case pending, it is not. allowed to talk with him or work. dak with him.. SHis home number is 832-3358. He said: "If you can't get a hold of ame, you can always get a hold of Frank and he'll know where l am because l don't do anything without his knowledge anyway." I told Keiser I don't know what, if anything, I could do about his problem but that I would bring it to the attention of my office. Sturgis than got on the line again and said that what keiser forgot to mention to me is that he has information that PLO leaders are using the drug traffic to finance their terrorist operations. ATHT 50955 DooId: 32264840 Page 13 --- ## Page 14 sturgis 8/4/76 tatel --asked if | contaeted the person who got the note from Cuba re meeting of Castro and Ruby... asked if l would give him the ar names and details again of the Tarabochia memo... - doesn't know the name of Pratkin or Paskin mentioned in memo.. (Why would Ruby visit him?) well, why would Ruby go visit McWillie.. You know Mcwillie was one of the big boys there... so evidentally he had more than one connection... but remember when he went over there there were no more racket guys there, so why would he go see this man? --Trafficante came out, I think, in 60, when they closed the casinos... that was after l came out...l left in June of *2882*959- 1959 -- the casinos were still operating.. (Could Trafficante have had a deal with Castro?) I doubt it. Remember I closed the casinos for 10 days on Castro's orders. There was a big uproaa. I told Trafficante and some of these otherpeople, because l was in charge of the casinos for the government, and I told them, I says, I want to tell you something for your own good, Fidel has said that hasx he's going to run all the gangsters out of Cuba and take all their businesses. On one of my tours of the casinos I ran into Santos and l told santos, l said, I want to tell you something, if you see your other friends tell them I was in the prime ministers office with Fidel and Bidel said he's gonna nationalize all the American businesses here and he 's goinna run you fuckin' gangsters out of Cuba.' And he says, 'Naah, he can't do that, we got over a hundred million dollars in investiments here! Who the fuck does he think he is?! He was really hot. "That sunavatich should be dead!' Naah, he was an enemy of Fidel's. (what's behind Crile piece then?) I don't know. Crile took some cracks at me. Well, I can't say that's wrong, because l don't know, all I can say is what happened to me and what l know. But, let's face it, Martinez worked for the mob. He was working for the Havana Hilton when I met him in 1959 on the baccarat table. -- knows Aleman, not well. "not buddy buddy with him like arenar, never talked to him about this; "I'm surprised Aleman came up with that because one time Aleman borrowed some money from Santos when he needed it." Trafficante kill JFK? "I don't think 50, no, I don't think so. The man most logically to want to kill JFK would be that guy k in New Orleans, whassisname, yeah Marcella. He would be the logical one." Surprised Aleman said that. "He's got a lotta balls to say that in the paper; argestatkex but why didn't it come out down here?" ** But I don't know why Martinez k is working with Barker. Barker is a totten sunavabitch. But one of these days l'll find out why a certain ClA agent wanted me to do a domestic assassimation. I wish I bad a good memory to &x find out when it was asked me because that would nail that sunnavabitch CO of the party, because as I understand his CO was very leftist and considered an undercover Communist agent, but l'll dig it out one of these days.. NH 50955 DocId: 32264810 Page 14 --- ## Page 15 2 You know, Ambassador smith called who was chief of ClA in Havana in 1959, a "goddamn Communist." Oh, you don't know what went on... (Was there a Cogswell also?) I don't know, l'll have to check some of my notes on some of these things. You know Paul Bethel was there also, he was the press agent... that was a nice little cover...yeah, he was an agent... he may be retired right now, but l believe he's done some contract work for them off and on... No, I can't believe that Santos worked with 8d Fidel; You know I told you that they contacted me once, wanted me to kill fidel.. (Yeah, Norm Rothman asked you, didn't he?) Опаха по, по, по. It was Hymie Levine and another party... but they had a lot of connections with other people, besides me, who were constantly with Fidel and if they wanted to nail him they could have..: Trafficante hangs out at Capra's (80th & Biscayne) when he's in town... that's one of his people there.... 8 o'clock. I haven't been there for years, but l know , I was told one time, if you ever want to see me or something like that. g'oclock, have spaghetti with me, you know, we'll both hit, but I don't go there, I don't mess with him, I keep away from zee mob...not my kind of people... NH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page --- ## Page 16 Sturgis 8/5/76 tatel -asked if I spoke to Barker or Martinez yet? Crile wrote an article about me that didn't put me in a good light. 0f course, you know me and Barker a. are on the outs. I don't like Barker... You know, I was gonna put Barker's head through the wall kap in prison. The sunavabitch is freakin! coward. I tried to get at him and four of the prisoners grabbed me and he went into the corner like goddamn baby, the sunavabitch. But l'11 fix his ass. You know I told the Senate Watergate Committee that one CIA associate of mine asked me to do a domestic assassination, and I told *e them it was Bernard Barker. Add I told them, if you don't believe me, give me a polygraph...And his CO was a goddamn Communist bastard! (yells) Because he sure loved Fidel, even over here. But I told Barker I wanted the orders directly from the because l wanted to make sure l knew who the & people was... I told Barker, if you're co told you to contact me, then I want to see him...then the co told him he didn't o want me to do it... And I don't know what year this was... •The Rockefeller Commission really went into detail with me on that. told them, I says, well, • 111 be honest with you, because this is why l'm so mad at these goddamn ClA officials. They get you to do their dirty work and after a while they throw you to the wolves, like they did at the Watergate and...uhh, you know... uhhh.. so now I'm down on them. Fuck em. well, whatayagonna do? lasked him who Barker's CO was: talked around it) Barker had same CO here as he had in Havana I forget who is CO was., because an employee had various types of agents: Barker and Martinez were contract agents,. I was not a contract agent, because -2X 34X I didn't sign a contract and didn't swear to arreax secrecy, but I was a so-called field operator recruited by them to work for them on a cash basis, for a week or for months...but I wasn't in the same position Barker and Martinez was...because there were times here when they wanted me to turn in Cubans making raids against Cuba and I said, Hell, you gotta be kiddin' I'm a goddamn revolutionary! Just because you people are not assisting Cubans anymore, l'm gonna turn them in? Fuck you, l'm not gonna like l was very close to Sam Jenis and whole x family, we were very close, very close, since 1956, and I worked with that whole family, and two of the family members were ClA people, but they knew how I felt, they knew I would never betray the cubans.. ... this here David Phillips, he knocked the shit out of me on televisoon, he said, "We never did no assassination, and Sturgis is full of shit, he never had no association with. us, he never was an agent!" Well, fuck him; the sunavabitch, a week later all the shit broke loose about assassinations and all, and the Gianncanna bit, and then admitted on television that when he was chief of western hemisphere division, that he notified the Cuban government--Castro! --through the Czechoslovakian embassy, when Cuban groups were leaving the south Florida area to da.go to CubaR and a do operations against him. Here's a man admitting that he was betraying Cubans to. be caught over there and executed! NY 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 16 --- ## Page 17 ******** (1 heard & he was involved in some Castro assassination attempts that never came off) "I'm gonna tell you something.. I think it's a little game they play. I think the plots that they wanted us to do were simply done to go ahead and make certain people think that they were working. But I think what they were doing all along, they were really betraying us, you know what I mean? They have one policy: Nail 'em, but behind the door stop it. The Cubans had.a d force here and they had this feeling against Castro; SO to pacify certain people who had lot of influence here, they had to pacify them by saying, well, we're gonna do things, but at the same time they're doing the betrayal bullshit... And David Phillips convinced me that they had been doing this all along, just betraying everyone, the American public and everyone.. (I hear he was pretty much involved in the Chilean thing also) Who, Phillips? With the Allende thing? You better believe it! l1 asked him why did David Phillips have an interest in his Cellula Fantasma operation, as l had heard he had?) I don't know, he said, I really don't know. Well, he was pretty high up, you know.. leven in 61, 62?) ••well, yeah..." Said the guy in charge was conte-Aquerra, he worked for the company, later they sent him to Europe on an economic mission... "Then Diaz-Lanz go! into the picture, he was suppose to take over the group, and that's what started a lot of problems. We had a lot of problems and think this is where David Phillips came in, becaase ;then he started to get interested, you know, because of Pedro Diaz Lanz coming into the group." "I'm writing a book. I sign a contract with Oscar Fraley this Sunday." Doing a movie with Morgan on the Trujillo thing, and Fraley will do the book of his life, less the trujillo thing.. -talk to Pedro Diaz Lanz, that's how 1got involved in the Trujillo thing. for the people. Geraldine Shamma will tell you that also. she hates him.. (Do, you see him much?) Not too much. When we were in prison, yean. Talk to Pedro diaz labo"fell you artimes andedle. And talk to him about Artime. You Artime is still working Artime's an double agent. But since l've been out l've kept away from him. don't want a goddamn thing to do with the company... -- (About about Roselli?) I think they nailed him good. How do l read it? Cuban agents. But | leave a question mark. I hate to jump on something else, really, but they're capable of doina anything. "Cause I did a lot of dirty work for the sunavabitches, believe me, and they'll get people like me - because you know l was considered one of the most six dangerous men in thexartax country - and they can get people like me to do a lot of their dirty work, you know what I mean, because it leaves their hands clean and if they want to discredit you they can because they have the force and the power, they got everything working for them... But l'll give them the benefft of the doubt, I don't think they had anything to do with killing the President through. That l'll give them the benefit of the doubt... • NH 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 17 --- ## Page 18 Sturgis 8/16/76 - tatel I had the FBl call me. On the JFK stuff. They said, well, you made some statements on television andwe'd like tO get together with you. Met them over at Denny's. It- was about when I went to Calif. and was on TV out there and made certain statements about the meeting with Castro and Jack Ruby and they wanted to know about that... said Wash, calledthem. agents..Ben Conte and??? ... When I asked them about the letter, they told me that O'Connor had investigated that and that o'connor was the one who spoke withme about the JFK assassmadion. But they told they didn't know anythingabout a letter... *** O'Connor now in New Orleans???? Hey did you read anything about four constables fron Dallas who received a box of letters and documents pertaining to a meeting between Oswald and Ruby and soforht?? This box of 33 documents turned over to Dallas DA Henry Wade....??? ...well, a friend of mine called me up last night and I copied down some shit on it...you want to read you sore of this??? (is this from& clippings?) It may have because he told me he got it out ofsore papers... ... they turned it over to the FBl. and they gave a number and now they can't find the documents. Canyoubelieve that? Just like they can't find the letter, they can't find the documents... ..You never got a whold of Salvadore, did you? (You never gave me his name) Yes, I did, I gave you his phone number but he told me he wouldn't talk toyou, Schweiker!s man.. Salvadore Garcia - former ClA guy... says he doesn't like Schwelker. The 8 FBI guys also asked me I didn't believe l knew Roselli. about it... They asked me Rome about old them about Roselli. I told them I told them l know nothing what I thought, I said I fought the mob got rid of him..they're always fightingamong: temselves.. (re Crile pieces) l don't believe it. I don't think Trafficante had anything to do with it. l don't believe a guy like Trafficante could go ahead and do something like that on his own, he would have to get permission from the Commission, and I don't believe the commission would allow him to do something like that. They tried it once before with Anastasia. Anastasia wanted.totake over some of the gambling in Havana and the Commission said no. What happened, he went against the Commission's orders And Look what happened to him.: The same thing happened to Dutch schultz who wanted to knock off Tom Dewey. I can't see it. don't think the mob would want that kind ofcatastrophe tohappe to kill the president. NW 50955 DocId:32264840. Page 18 --- ## Page 19 (re the Rolling Stone piece and Trafficante relation to the Bay of Pigs and his contact in thatoperation, Fs) (Laughed) Was that in. Rolling Stone? You know, I'm trying to get my lawyers to sue them sunavabitches for about $20 million. Well, you know the mob was here on the Beach. And remember I told you how in cuba the emiessy was divided and how smith ven accused the chief of station of ClA, of being a communist because all his agents were feeding information to the guerillas and Castro... And here you have the mob over there, all these Cubans who were working for the mob over there, they came over here and the ClA made agents out of them! So, hey, the mob knew everything was going on.. You know, you had Normie Rothman who had the Biltmore Terrace, which was Batista's money, the top floor over there was going to house Batista if the government gave me him permission to come into thecountry.. Now that place was the hang out of a lot of mob people.. a lot.. and a lot of cuban ClA boys used to work for Batista. • . and alos intelligence agents from other countries would come in there...and the American ClA agents used to go wine and dine there, used to have a ball there ..and as far as I'm concerned, l don't have contact adie with Santos Trafficante here and I don't have any contact with the mob.. (re Watley's statement of Sturgis contact with Trafficante) HON Well, / don't know how Richard Waatley can go ahead and say shit like that because that's : garbaxge....That is garbage! (Who was Whatley?): *Whatley was one of these mercenaries who used to fool around with this ferry Patrick, trying to get involved with the Cuban exiles... You know, when I came out of cuba they came up withall sorts of wild stories that I was the contact between the mob and te CIA... that'a all bullshit -re a conflict of interest. on Ellis Rubin part because of suit with Hunt and him against CREEß (???> .. But I'm going to Washington anyway tomorrow.. Yeah, I told you that Senator Baker wanted to see me..yeah, they called me, Michael Madigan and Howard Liebengood called me, they sayd, come on up, weld like to talk to you about this JFk shit. Yeah, I was surprised.... (re Martinez working at Havana Hilton and Crile saying no) That's bullshit. That's where I met Martinez when I was working for the Embassy. I told that to the Senate Watergate Committee when they asked me...(why) Well, because Martinez has been working on $100 month retainer for the ClA and he has probably dug up a lot of information for the company and writing thebook with Crile and talking about Trafficante and Aleman, so naturally the ClA don't want anybody to know there was any connection. de's not goxax going to admit he worked for the bauxa gamblers.. met him. at the Havana Hilton working on the baccarat table.. (fairly well off?) Yeah, he did abortions, he had a whore hose over there... yeah, he was pretty well off... NW 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 19 --- ## Page 20 3 (re WerBell trial) Yeah, you know I recruited the undercover agent that got Bernstine.. Jerry Buchanan... I got a hold of the company first because it was out of the country, because they have a drug.. you know,, thing, but they slammed the door on me when I contacted them...l even had to go to Washington for the damn thing...so I got a hold of other friends of mine and they made the conneetion.. that's how derry was recruited...and he made out pretty good, they busted one of the biggest international aux drug conspiracies in the country.... and Bernstine turns around and he starts to work for the government.. (undercover?) Buchanan got involved up. to his eyeballs with Bernstine... I don't know how he made the connection... (Bernstine involved in Bay of Pigs?) I think that's all bul$shit (Bernstine crash an accident?) No, I think somebody killed him. He's too good a axa pilot... (WerBell) Well, he's sa friend of my old friend Andrew St. George and I think maybe Andy has helped bury WerBell a little bit... I swear to God, you can't even trust your friends nowadays.... HH 50955 DooId: 32264840 Page 20 --- ## Page 21 -notes -- Frank Sturgis - tatel - 4/18/77 (partial) (get any reaction from the New Times piece? Came drunks heavy on CIA..any reaction from them?) No, except David Phillips, you know every time he gets a chance wacks me. Because I made a big liar out of him.. KaN You know when I was in frint of tee Rockefeller Commission, I spent 16 hours with them, they want over very much withime on the JFK stuff and the mob stuff and CIA assassinatin plots and all this * stuff and everything started to leak out. Then David Phillips came ut out and started wacking me. Then got mad and I said, Fuck them, the hell with them, I'll just tell the truth! And that's when I said, Yeah, damn right, I been in tron touch with them, I was associated with them!" That's when David Phillips went on television and started knocking me, saying I was never an agent. I never told anyone I said I was associated with them. But the truth is I was recruited by them, because it's on record. It's in CIA records (Did you ever meet Phillips in Havana?) I don't know. This is the problem. I don't KnoW. You know my contact man, the CO I was working with, was Colonel Nichols.. And Nichols had Major Van Horn working with him.. And I met a few other CIA guys but I had never any contact with because the rest was strictly telephone. You know when you make contact with an agent, an employee, and you are directly in contact with someteing happens where teey have to leave, well, they li give you a code name and they 1l dive you a number and they'll tell you that this man hexexer here, so and so, will contact you, and this is the number. Then he disappears and then it's strictly telephone. You never really in touch with one another, after the first shot, after your first man leaves. ..Just like Barker. Barker met Hunt only one time. When he vas turned over to Hunt...'cause Howard told me thi'...I said, How many times did Barker ever meet you? He says, Well, one time. shasxax His man, who Barker was in touch when he came over here, he says, he turned Barker over to me, I needed an assistant, has he says, so he turned Barker over me, I met him one time and then after that we checked by telephone, the normal way of contact. He says after that when I left, I turned Barker over to somebody else, he said. It all depends on the situation you're in. Like Martinez, he was in maritime operations and so forth. Well, when you're in maritime operations you come in direct contact with one or more CIA CO's at one time....las a result of working on a ship where CIA officials xe are sir restricted in their movements).. in maritime you have more personal contact with them, because thep stay with the nahrar mother ship... (why is Phillips on your back?) Becaase I told the Committee that the CIA helped Fidel. The Communists were out to kill Fidel at the NW 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 21 --- ## Page 22 2 very beginning when we came out of the mountains. When Ambassador Smith asked the CIA the background of the Castro brothers and his top military officials, the Cia said no they had no communist background. Well, the FBI in the Embassy was given all the information on the Castro brothers, but the CIA wouldn't give Smith the correct intelligence informatoon. Smite called | William Cardwell, was the CIA station & chief and noteing but a fuckin communist. 90% of tee agents that work for me here are noteing but pro-communist bastards. That's why CIA had Smith removed through pressure in Washington. was another one of them. was way to the left. He was later Barker's CO here, and that sunavabitch (when was Barker's CO here?) Right after Hunt You see, Hunt Teft a week before the invasion. got tr be Barker's next political officer. Hunt went back up to Washington and was in the Cuban desk, and the man... remember Hunt was a political officer...and Hunt was transferred from the politicad office tr work with David Phillips, who was propaganda... (When wa$ Bender here?) Frank Bender?, He was here before, during and after the Bay of Pigs. Fle's a queer sunavabitch. (Wasn't he Barker's CO?) No! Bender? No! Bender was over-all chief of CIA here for the poliitcal section. That's old Droller. He was German born...and he was faggot too. No, he wasn't Barker's CO. Barker's CO was Hunt and teen it was like Hunt.. worked under Bender, just [Not Droller also called DRESCHER...] (Don't know where Droller is now; may be retired; he's a few years older than Hunt..) (RE PRIO) ; under gir financial pressure recently; wife only allotted him $1000 a month; he snorted Coke for years; only those close tr him knew how much business pressure he was under..***I asked a friend of mine who was close what happened..." (Duran???] No, he wasn't involved in narcotics...only yeass ago back Batista's day, everybody was then..but all he did now was coke...has all his life... sniff NH. 50955 DocId: 32264810 Page 22 --- ## Page 23 • 1' Frank Sturgis- notes - 9/21/77 tre Lorenz story) (Had you known she was going to break this?) No! I got a call Monday night, tonight's: Wednesday, right?,.from Paul Meskil, and Paul told me, he says, "Frank, Merita gave me something and I wanted you to de know about it and I want your comments on it." I says, "Shoot." He says, "You know, she has made statements and gave it to us and my editor is thinking about putting it in the papers." So! says, "What is it?" He says, "Well, she claims, she says, you know, this, this and this about Alex Rorke and some pictures somewheres in a training camp, l suppose, you know, and pictures of you, Daaz Lanz, I think she mentioned Diaz Lanz, l'm not sure, well anyway, me, Oswald and so forth. So'l says, "Oh yeah, what else?" And he says we had some maps out with a couple of Cubans, Pedro Diaz Lanz, yBurself, Oswald, and it had D*arx&x Dallas, and that we were, we all got into two automobiles and we drove to Dallas a couple days, a few days, whatever, before the assassination, and that we went there, and that we were members of Operation 40, and that we went there specifically to go ahead and kill the President of the United States: I says, "She's got to be out of her goddamn mind! She's gotta be whacko to say shit like that!.. How the hell can she prove this? I says, I volunteered, like you know with the JFK assassination, to take a polygraph. l says, l'11 do the same goddamn thing now! That shels lying." So ha says something about supposedly the two pictures that she had, one was missing with some German girl who was supposed to write her book.... (Had she ever mentioned this to you before?) Not a thing cabout that. You know, my own opinion, she's been messing around with these gangsters. And yank you know, the father of one of her kids is a very wealthy man, owns some race horses and stuff like that, a lewish guy, and he's a loan shark for the mob. (Know his name?) Ed something. I think maybe him or the other da guy might have pushed her, because she's always bitching that she needs money, and I think maybe more or less they busted her balls and said, hey look, you want cash for your book, this and that, you gotta k get something spectacular, you know, they always came up with some goddamn mob lawyers for her to handle her book and so forth, and you know, she's a little whacko. This is the conclusion l come to, but l don't know what's behind her mind to do this, because, hey, we're friends, but, christ, with something like this, she' s actually getting herseef, and Pedro and muself involved in killing the President! She's gotta be out of her goddamn mind! Was she in Miami at that time, in November. of '63?) "I can't remember that long. All I know is, like l told you, the iday that Kennedy got killed I was here in the house. It beats the "hell out of me, I can't get remember that long if she was here at the time. Merola= matt Melane-ClA NH 50955-DoeId:32264010 Page 23 --- ## Page 24 2 "Well, you know, too, she was Perez Jimenez's mistréss. And Perez Jimenez was giving of the Cuban people And also in New Orleans, with money so. forth. And she told me, at one time, that possibility at one time that Jimenez wanted to do something against the Kennedys. Now I don't know who she meant, weether it was the President or Bobby Kennedy or what, l don't but it's something she told me this pasped year up in New York. •How true it is, I don't know.". (Did Jimenez have a lot of money when he was here?) Shit, yeah. He lived on one of the island here, kept her in a fancy apartment because you know she had a baby by Jimenez, a girl, and she's a split image of jimenez. And the was involved in all kind of bullshit, Jimenez was. But who knows whether it's true. The only way to go ahead and get the truth out of her, like l told Paul, l says Paul, the people from the Assassination Committee if they believe her, should make her come to Washington and put her under oath, then ask her to take a polygrah. And 1'1l xax tell you this, l'll take a polygraph that the statement that she said is a complete lie! That it is not so! No way in the world did l ever travel to Dallas, Texas with her, with Bosch, with Pedro, or Oswald. Cause I told the Committee and I told you, too, hey, to the best of my knowledge I don't think l ever met Oswald. Because you know the shit that was coming out of the town from here, that I made the statement the FBl got dox going that oswald was in town here, and this Lyle Stuart, the guy who was financing the fair Play for Cuba thing, and that's known as being backed up with Communist money, that. supposedly Oswald was here and was on a radio station, there was some article about it in the paper, that he front of some TV station or something, but hey, I don't know, this is all some bullshit talk, I don't know if he was here or not? But I was talking with a friend of mine today, Bob Tralins, and he remembered Oswald was (Talked to him last year)... "Oh you did." (Didn't rRe Lorenz claim that Hemming was in photol "Yeah, he called me up last nicht. (Where was that training camp supposed to have been?) "Big Pine Key, or No Name. Well there were several down there. We had one out in the Everalades too. But eventually they separated from me and started doing shit on their own. Jerry had all the fuckin' garbage all over theunited states in with nim, bunch of crazy bastards." (erry knew Merita, als0, didn't he?) "I don't know. That's it, l really don't know. "But why Merita would say shit like this, l really krox don't know either. But I tell you sometting, she's got a lot of balls, this gal. But, hey, this gal here did some good stuff for the government, believe me.. You know, in the past she turned NW 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page. 24 --- ## Page 25 3 over Communist codes to me, and documents and shit like that. she worked for the Company before and she worked for the FBl as an undercover agent for about seven vears, even had her kid do shit for them. And she was out being a mistress. for the top Russian KGB agent in New York. She was his undercover mistress, he bought her jewelry and booze, wining and dining her. and she was ballin' him. You know, she won't say it to anybody because it would make her look like a whore, you know, but hey, man, she really did a job. And I took tabe recordings of all that shit, k you know, and I turned it over to our intelligence, they got it, they took copies of it ax and all that. Yeah, she's got a lot of balls... (re clicks on line) "That's probably the FBl bugging me, ha, ha, ha. I hope they got a court order. Hey, you know, that's how Nixon lost his 18 minutes of tape, you know. the rabe cap. You know I know who did it, I know who ordered it. I was told who ordered it, and l believe I know the man who x erased it. It was erased electronically. (Why?) Well, you remember there were statements l made to you and then it came out in the press about Nixon * was trying to cover himself about the files he wanted from ClA about the Bay of Pigs and the missiles and the Kennedy assassitation, he ordered Helms to give it to him and Helms wouldn't give it to him. Three times he wouldn't give it to him and then Nixon fired him for it. Well, in that 18 and half minutes tape l think there were conversations on that, that pertained to what I was talking about, and this ex-agent told me, he says, "Frank, you're right, with the statements that you made, you know, that I read about what you said about Nixon being set up and so forth and about the files and all that, well, l want to tell you something, l was hired to erase those tapes." And he says, "It was done electronically. And the man no hired me was so and so. And 1 got the tape recordine of it, too. 10f the guy telling you this?) Yes, sir. Hopefully, it's still here. I mean, hopefully it's still in my possession, baerasex you know what l mean, if I don't go ahead and get It.all erased, ha. ha. But he told me, and whether it was bullshit or a lie done know, bus this quy was an R ex-CIA:. agent. Well, after a period of time these people get a little disgusted with their government, with what goes on and so forth times, and sometimes people will tell other people, yOU know, which is limited to the people they tell, of so and SO and so and so. Who knows, it's a funny world. I suspect one of these days I'm conna xak wake un and somebody is gonna shoot my ass. But, hey, *a it's the name of the game.. I don'+ worry about it. But sometimes I think Pedro is right. You know he thinks the Agency is gonna kill him. He says, "1 know too much about the Agency.' You know, he thinks Artime is a HH 50955. DooId: 32264840 Page 25 --- ## Page 26 4 double agent. (Have you heard from Artime?) Hell, no, Artime wouldn't call. me. You know who called me yesterday? Howard. (Hunt?) Yeah, ha, ha, ha, Howard. Here comes all these press people inside the doors and Howard calls me on the phone and says, "Hey, sorry to hear about this, so on and sar so forth. I saw you on television, you really did a good job.' Yeah, I says, Howard,. I got all the press walking * in the front door right now. Ult's a wonder she didn't put him in this thing, too, huh?) "Wall, she pulled a boo-boo by saying that when she came from Cuba she met Howard Hunt and myself. And I called her up and I says, "You never met Howard Hunt and me! It was not Howard Hunt!T. She says, 'Well, I thought it was Howard Hunt.' I says, "If you saw Howard Hunt todays you wouldn't know who the hell the man was! How & could you go ahead and say that?' She says, 'Well, it don't make no difference, what difference does it make?' I says, 'It makes a lot of difference!' I says, "I never knew Howard at that Fime. ' I says, "Now l'm under oath telling these people, the senate Watergate Committee that taxI didn't know Howard, never met -- which is true, you know -1 never personally met Howard until either late 171 or 172 and you come up with a cockamania story that Frank arranged for my escare out of Cuba and the first people l meet in Miami is Frank Sturgis and E. Howard Hunt. You gotta be crazy! To say shit like that, oh God. But she wants to get in the goddamn papers. You know Howard's been hittin' the papers quite a bit. But I says, "Why do you want to put the man in the jackpot for? That's a lie.' I says, "Them people ever ask you to take a polygraph, for christ's sake, they'll make a goddamn liar out of you. Because you never met Howard Hunt because I never knew Howard Hunt.' She never met Howard Hunt. At least the best as l know. Maybe in bed someplace she met him, you know, ha, ha, ha. she sure as hell didn't meet Howard Hunt with me?" NW 50955 DocId: 32264840 Page 26. ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10066-10082.pdf
104-10066-10082
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
12/12/78
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
N. SHEPANEK
"DISSEMINATION OF HSCA DRAFT ON CIA PERFORMANCE"
2
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK11 : F6 : 1993.07.16.08:20:54:530580 : FILE ORIGINAL WAS MISTAKENLY STAMPED IN 1993.
2
## Page 1 104-10066-10082 17 18. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 38 39 is item. Located Russ Sturbelts-LADis Returned to Ken 6D15 Dete 127218 Shepare peshod Martin Smell IMS Julian 7ox cI ed andress SE Shepanek PCS/000 ok rok ok ok ok ok ok Sentto ok ok otS returned detecte O KI ok ok ok ok ok Committee Kite hens a 11 4 HISLA 128478 12 Дe78 18 132078 Shepande pes/or all copies returned ar accounted vor as inclicated. above 12Ve 1978. Returned --- ## Page 2 14-00000 HSCA Draft CIA Performance - Bark SENT TO : DATE SENT DATE RETURNE) copy * 16,17 Russ Holmes 21N0x78 19,20, 2), 25, WmSturbitts LA DIV 24, 25, th 22,35,J Nobert Staponct 36,37, PCS 28C 38,39 27,28 29,30,31 32,33 21N00 78 2P Noo78.écs: 18, 20 23,15,26 30 Nar 78ce. 1424 36N0078 2! 21N0078 Martini Smith IMS 2/ N0078 Julian 707685421N78 Cd Andrews- SE)i 21N0N78 27 Now 78 opies tured in l Dale 12. Dee Ken x 5655(Pm6215. 22 23 24. 26 32 3 3 34 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10143-10330.pdf
104-10143-10330
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
4/5/78
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
MR. SHEPANEK
CARPENTIER, PATRICK L.
MEMO: HSCA INTERVIEWS OF SR DIVISION INDIVIDUALS
2
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK58 : F8 : 1993.07.30.14:37:43:280041 :
2
## Page 1 104-10143-10330). SECREI OLE RECUTS COPY Intervieno OLC 78-0443/3 5 April 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Shepanek 0/SA/DO/O FROM : Mr. Patrick L. Carpentier Assistant Legislative Counsel SUBJECT : HSCA Interviews of Individuals (S) SR Division 1. (S) Michael Goldsmith, HSCA staff, called concerning the Committee's letter of 2 March 1978 and requested that the Committee will contine its interviews of persons assigned to the only to those people that were then assigned to the SR Division. The remaining individuals listed can be completely disregarded. 2. (S) Goldsmith also requested that arrangements be made for staff investigator Harold Leap to interview those persons now serving in Headquarters who were assigned to the SR. Division of the in 1963. At this time we will arrange such interviews only for those persons who served in the SR Division during the months of November and December 1963• 3. (S) Will you please follow through and make the necessary arrangements. After the first group is interviewed, we will discuss this request with Goldsmith and Leap to determine whether or not it will be necessary to interview those people that were assigned to the Pin 1963 prior to the assassination. Datect Hau carpentier 21022 SECRET airper cL erll 3423 --- ## Page 2 =.. Distribution: Orig - Addressee • - OLe Subject 1 - OLC Chron OLC: PLC:jms (5 Apr 78) ... ---
2,018
/releases/2018
180-10142-10018.pdf
180-10142-10018
04/26/2018
Redact
HSCA
00/00/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
22-19-01
CIA
119
HSCA
CIA SEGREGATED COLLECTION
3/12/18
Box 10
null
## Page 1 180-10142-10018 Classification:. (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) THIS COPY IS NOT FOR RELEASE. JFK 38X22 Folder 19 Cover Sheet The attached package of paper is the property of the House Select-Committee on Assassinations, and is on loan to CIA under an agreement whereby CIA is not to reproduce or copy the draft or any portion thereof. Notes may be taken on materials in this package, and rough notes may be prepared as a basis for informal and oral exchanges with HSCA representatives. These notes, however are to be held as though controlled and aTi to be destroyed under agrecd conditions with HSCA. They are not be copied or excerpted and are to be heid until further instructions are received for • eventual disposal These papers have been numbered for accountability receipted accordingly. They are to be handled. on a secure basilis though constituting sensitive papers on a need-tö.. or basis. RERPORIICTION DO NOT REPRODUCE RETURN TO CIA Copy 250f 42 Classification: 10142-100181 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 2 Berk-writelassification: (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.). (1) Purpose and Scope of Study The Central Intelligence Agency's performance in its role of support to the Warren Commission public concern durin nas been a source of controversy since) the pasT neef then her sensen commission. Critics have repeatedly charged that the CIA participated in a conspiracy designed to suppress information relevant to the assassination of President Kennedy• During 1976 the Critic's assertions were the subject of official inguiry by the Senate Select Committee to Study (SS<) Governmental Operations therein =1 SsC). The SSC, in its report regarding. "The Investigation of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: Performance of the Intelligence Agencies" reached Findino he following cone-lusion The Committee emphasizes that it has not uncovered any evidence sufficient to justify a conclusion that there was a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy• The Committee has, however, developed evidence which impeaches the process Classification: Classified BAliArAnO --- ## Page 3 SEC Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted from A wisco led de merel i gence agencies arrived at their own conclusions. about the assassination, and by which they provided information to the Warren Commission. This evidence indicates that the investigation of the assassina- tion was deficient and that facts which might have substantially affected™ the course of the inves- tigation were not provided the Warren Commission or those individuals within the EBI and withinvestigating the asgassina- tion: (SSC, DocKI,P6) (2) Th1 ommittee has sought to examine in greater detail the general findings of the SSC. The Committee has particularly focused its attention on the specific issue of whether the CIA or any employee or former employee of the CIA misinformed. or withheld information relevant to the assassina- tion of President Kennedy from the Warren Commission. In addition, the Committee has attempted to determine whether, if the Warren Commission was misinformed or not made privy to information relevant to its investigation, the misinforming or withholding of evidence from the Warren Commission was the Classification: Classified Groan: _ --- ## Page 4 * The AM-LASH One. of fire CIAT 3 Classification: S5/32T. (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) result of a conscious intent to do so by the Agency or its employees. (3) The Committee has sought to examine the issue detailed above in both an objective and disciplined manner.. In order to accomplish this goal the Committee has utilized a 1977 TasS fie (19.77 T FR). Repost by the CIA*s, Inspente general lis Report was highly critical of pertaining tothe AMLASHeperation* the SSC findings and asserted that the SsC the militia Final Report conveyed(an) ) impression of limited effort by the CIA to assist the Warren Commission TER in its work. The 7 IGR was in fundamental disagreement with this characterization of the SSC findings and noted that "CIA did seek and collect information in support of the warren Commission. Additionally, it conducted studies and submitted special analyses andreports..3 (TE, Intaction to ta) (4) In order to demonstrate further the scope of support provided by the CIA to the Warren 19 PFR Commission, the 77 IR contained a comprehensive listing of CIA generated material made available /р.т. Classification: operation wis adsendination plots! Classified by derivan 0 0 0 02 --- ## Page 5 D/TI (5) (6) (7) Classification: - (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) to both the U.S. Intelligence Community and the Warren Commission regarding the assassina- tion of President Kennedy. In this respect, the committee agrees with the y7 tes ‹ wherein it is stated that "This compiliation (of CIA generated material) is appropriate to consideration of the extent of the CIA effort, to the extent that it reveals something of the results of that effort TEK 177 IER, Introduction to Tab E) 'In examining the Agency's comprehensive listing of CIA generated material referenced above, the Committee has paralled its review to the structure given to these materialsby the TFR 1?7 IGR. In this regard the ?? fer details four inter- related compilations of Kennedy assassination material: These four compilations are: 1) Agency dissemination of information to the Intelligence Community (Formal and Informal Disseminations) 2) Dissemination of material to the Warren Commission Classification: _ 000003 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 6 - 5 Classification: (P) This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) • 3) Agency dissemination to the FBI et al regarding rumors and allegations regarding President Kennedy's assassination 9) 4) Memorandum submitted by CIA to the Warren Commission on Rumors and Allegations Relating to the President's Assassinati 177 TEl Introduction to Tab F (10) In reviewina these compilations, the Committee focused upon those TER CIA materials which the ?? teR documented as having bein ^ made available in written form to the Warren Commission. (11) During the course of this study, additional Agency files have been revieved. These files have been examined in an effort to resolve certain issues created by the review of the Agency's compilations discussed in this report. Where apparent gaps existed in the written record, files have been requested and reviewed in an effort to resolve these gaps. Where significant substantive Classification: 000004 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 7 Classification: - (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) issues have arisen related to the kind and quality of information provided the Warren Commission, files have also been requested and reviewed in an effort to resolve these issues. As a result, approximately thirty files, comprising an approximate total of ninety volumes of material have been examined and analyzed in preparation of this report. (2) The findings set forth herein are subject to modification due to the following considera tions. During the course. of the past fifteen years; the CIA has generated massive amounts of information related to the assassination of President Kennedy. In spite of the Agency"s sophisticated doeument-retrieval system, Certain documents reguested by this Committee for study and analysis have not been located. Whether these documents merely have been filed incorrectly or destroyed, gaps in the written record still do 000005 exist. ( 13) Secondly, due to dissimlar standards of investigative --- ## Page 8 Classification: septer. (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) relevancy adopted by the CIA and this Committee, certain files requested by the Committee for review :: have been made available to the Committee in a santized fashion. Therefore, to the degree reflected by the Agency's denial of access and/or santization of certain materials, this study's conclusions are based upon the best evidence available to the Committee though this may not be all relevant evidence to which ( 14) the Agency has access. One must, moreover, give due consideration to the role that oral discussions, oral briefings, and meetings of Warren Commission and CIA representatives may have played in the supply of assassination-related information by the CIA to the Warren Commission. The subject and substance of these discussions, briefings, and meetings may not always be reflected by the written record made the subject of this study. Therefore, the Committee has conducted interviews, depositions and executive session hearings with 000006 ElA files pertaining to AMMuS-1, Maria Teresa Prenza, edwins Is parsonal 5a42 nodings dere muds aveilabiClossificationi..ttec subject to Aginay Sanitraition of the n T. Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 9 Classificatish: = -Se Thiss form is to sed for materi extracted - 8 CO key Warren Commission staff and members and former or present CIA representatives in an effort to resolve questions that are not addressed by the written record. The results of the Committee's efforts to chronicle this (15) aspect of the working relationship between the Warren Commission and the CIA will be a subject for discussion herein. In addition this report will examine the following subjects generated by the Committee's study (as outlined aboves in the following general order of discussion: 18) (11) (18) 1) the organization of the CIA's investigation of President Kennedy's assassination; 2) the working relationship of the Warren Commission staff and those CIA répresentatives concerned with the Warren Commission inquiry; 3) the standards of investigative cooperation thal which the Warren Commission staff believed to govern the quality and quantity of information supplied by the CIA to the Warren Commission; Alassification: = 000007 20.0513 Easified By derivation S. Berk --- ## Page 10 Etassifieation: pet -8a- (19) 4) (20) 5) the CIA's concern for protection of its sensitive sources and methods and the consequent effects of this concern upon the warren Commission investigation; and the substance and quality of information concerning Luisa Calderon passed to the Warren Commission and the results of this Committee's investigation of Calderon and her significance to the events of November 22, 1963. II. Select Commitice Stuig si Information Made Available by CIA to Warren Commission Sel CIA page 2000517 infra for beginning of this section It invatigation a the cit involued an extensive andly is of some fits. sentine vources and method Beccuse the round and method and button disclosure, portion to this report have been --- ## Page 11 Erassification: - To be insated prior to Section II I. Organization of CIA Investigation of President Kennedy's Assassination (21) In his Executive Session testimony before the Select Committee, Richard Helms, the CIA's Deputy Director for Plans during 1963, described the CIA's role in the investigation of President Kennedy's assassination as follows: (12) This crime was committed on United States soil. Therefore, as far as the Federal government was concerned, the pri- mary investigating agency would have been the Federal Bureau of Investigation without any question. The role of the CIA would have been entirely supportive in the sense of what material we are (sic) able to acquire outside the limits of the United States with reference to the investigation. For investigative purposes, the Agency Classification: 000009 20.0535 lassified by CervaTion derivation: --- ## Page 12 SECRET this form is t8 be used for material extrasted from ElA- egRislled dscuments:) had no investigative role inside the United States at all. So when I used here the word "supportive," I meant that in the literal sense of the term. We are (sic) trying to support the FBI and support the Warren Commission and be responsive to their requests, but we were not initiating any investigations of our own or, towmy recollection, were we ever asked-to (Executive Session Testimony of Richard Helms, 8/9/78, pp. 17-18-0 (23) On November 23, 1963 Helms called a meeting of senio: level CIA officials to outline the Agency's investiga tive responsibility vis a vis the assassination SSCa desk office (cadquarter Book V, p. 25.) andrewester At that time, Helms placed John Scelso, bustin Branch Chief for CIA operations in Mexico, Central Ameri Ponama, in charge of the Agency's initial investigative-efforts. (HSCA Class. Deposition of John 'Scelso, 5/16/78, PP. 111-112--ExecSession Testimony SECRET. 000010 2060503 derivation Classified by derivation --- ## Page 13 3 ElassifisatisA: This form is to be extracted of Richard Helms, 8/9/78, p. 10.) (24) Scelso testified before the (Select Committee that he was given charge of the Agency's investigation on the basis of two considerations: 1) 'his prior experience in conducting major CIA security investi- reported to C/# gations and 2) the observance of Oswald by CIA L headwater's surveiHanee in Mexico@ (Scelso's operational concern less than two months prior to the assassination (SSC Book V, P. 25, HSCA Class. Deposition of John Scelso, WasaH2202490400-20400241441999956 5/16/70, pp. 111-112. 7) Scelso also noted that "during the course of his investigative efforts, Helms did not pressure him to adopt specific investigative theories nor reach conclusions within a set period of MSCA ClASS DeR oR JohnScelso 8/9/78 * Raymond Rocca, Chief of Research and Analysis for CIA's Counterintelligence Staff characterized Scelso's responsibility not as a mandate to investigate but rather to "coordinate traffic (code facilitation, telegram or telegraphic consideration) for working with the DDP with respect to what was being done over the whole world..." the GPFLOOR, phaser (Ibia.) Classification: = 000011 2060537 Elasified by derivation: --- ## Page 14 - 4.- 5201 Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) (25) tion: Scelso described in detail to the Committee the manner in which he conducted the Agency's investiga- •..practically my whole Branch participated in the thing. We dropped almost everything else and I put a lot of my officers to work in tracing names, analyzing files. reports, suggestions, allegations from all checked out. Ne were checking out just dozen: nd dozens of-people-all thetime, (HSCA Classifie Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/70, p. 131)* *. During the course of the Agency's invetigation, Liaison with the FBI was handled for the CIA by (Ibid. p. 80.) At the time of the assassination A. a former FBI agenti was Chief of the Special Investigations Group of the CIA's Counterintelligence Staff. (HSeA Classifted 'Deposition of He A characterized his functions with respect to the Agency as follows: (This footnote - Footnote *: - continues on bottom of page 5) 014755 Classification: 000012 26. 0510 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 15 Elassification: (26) Scelso stated during his testimony that CIA field stations worldwide were alerted to the Agency's investigation "and the key stations were receiving tips on the case, most of which were phony. We did not send out instructions saying everybody participate in the investigation." (Ibid. p. 135.) It was his • recollection, however that throughout his tenure as Mexico traine coordinator of the Agency's investigation, the Mexico City Station was the only CIA field station directly unit Footnote continued from bottom of page 4. I knew that we fat CIA did not have the basic responsibility for investigating the assassination of the President. If there was a crime commited in the course of this activity, (sic) it belonged to the FBI. I recognized that it was our responsibility to give the fullest cooperation to the FBI to protect the Agency with regard to any aspects of our operations, you understand, and at the same time giving them cooperation, and Iwas in close contact with Mr. Sam Papich {of the FBI, and always fully co- operated, and he always fully cooperated with me. (Ibid. p. 52.) This noted that his office (CI/SIG) at the direction of the Chief of Counterintelligence, James Angleton, was designated the central point for collection of assassination- related information made available to the FBI. (Ibid. pp. 52-53. Classification: 2060573 000013 Classied By derivation derivation: --- ## Page 16 ErassifieatigA: - SECRET According othe Agency, an animations.. Subsequently, this immediately, pursue other investigative 13 involved in investigatory, activities related to President Kennedy's assassination (Tbia? / 34 (27) During the latter haft of December, scelso issued a summary report which described Oswald's activities in Mexico City from September 26, 1963 - October 3, 1963. Scelso characterized the summary report as incomplete by comparison to assassination-related information then available to the FBI but not provided to CIA until late Dec. 1963. (Ibia. PP. 11A-drs.) (CIA Document Report by John Scelso to C/CI DeC. 63.1** (28) Following issuance of this report, Helms shifted responsibility for the CIA's investigation of President Kennedy's assassination-to-the=Counterintelligence Staff. HSCA Classified Deposition of John Scelso 5/16/78, p. 136, ef. HSCA Classified Deposition of Raymond Rocca, 7/17/78, P. 15 wherein Rocca states that responsibility shifted from Scelso to CI Staff on политов та Рітак January 12, 1964) Helms testified that this shift in /S. * SHA the CIA "does wit agree all of its branche ten of its station ** Approximately two days after President Kennedy's assassination, Scelso prepared a summary report, provided to President Johnson by helms. This report adopted the position that Oswald probably was a lone assassin who had no visible ties to Soviet or Cuban intelligence though such ties could not be excluded from consign House fol-Get Con assication: Peps. of ToB61890090014 20.0510 Elasified By dertvation 014738 Jerivation --- ## Page 17 7 ElassificatisA: SECRET This form in to be t man a controlled responsibility was a logical development because the investigation had begun to take on broader tones. (Executive Session Testimony of Richard Helms, 8/9/78, p. 14, see also HSCA Classified Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 138.) (29) Helms reasoning was expanded upon by Raymond Rocca who testified before the Committee that the shift in responsibility described by Helms was caused in part by the establishment of the Warren Commission 7/17/78 (HSCA Classified Deposition of Raymond Rocca, pp. 12-13.) Rocca added: 30 It was entirely appropriate in the GPFLOOR phase that he (Scelso) would have that (responsibility for the Agency investigation.) But the minute you had a commission set up outside the line obviously had to be the Director, and from the Director to his Chief of Operations overseas, because the spread involved then all of the divisions. Here you had Mr. (Scelso) being asked to sign off on cables that had to do with the Netherlands, with U.K., with Australia, and it would have seemed to me utterly administratively simply-g-hybrid-monster.HSCA Classified Deposition of R. Rocca, 7/17/78, p. 120) (31) spread James Angleton supported Rocca's belief that "the (of investigative responsibility) involved... chief of the counterintelligene staff, 15022 • 18 000015 20(0511 Classified by derivatioti: --- ## Page 18 A classified stefl ryant desting explicitly with thee semitive roune and methods CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR RELEASE OF THIG DOCUMENT --- ## Page 19 8 ClassifiestA: — extracted all of the (CIA divisions." Angleton testifed to this Committee that the Agency's efforts to gather and coordinate information related to the assassination underwent a metamorphic transition. Initially, Angleton noted, the Director, Deputy Director, Division Chiefs and Case Officers approached Warren Commission. requirements in a piecemeal fashion. However, Angleton testified the Agency was eventually able to focus its resources to avoid duplication of effort and provide a system for the central referencing of assassination related information as such information was developed. MASCA Classified Deposition of James Angleton, 10/5/78, pp. 76-77, see also HSCA Classified Deposition of Raymond Rocca, 7/17/78, p. 23.) safet Classification: 000016 206092 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 20 ElassifiestigA: = i SECRET from SAcontrolled documents: (32 The record reveals that during this second phase of CIA information collection efforts in support of the Warren Commission investigation the concentration of Agency resources shifted in emphasis from exploration of Oswald's activities in Mexico City to his residency in the Soviet Union during 1959-1962 and possible association with the Soviet intelligence apparatus.@ segPa.ff) (Ibia., pp. 32-33,44, Executive Session of Testimony Richard Helms, 8/9/78, p. 23. Accordingig, Rocca commented that during this phase primary interest in support of the Argue Warren Commission was to follow-up on Soviet leads g on the assumption that a person who spends four years*fin the Soviet Union, under his circumstances, had to be of specific interest to Soviet State security and their collateral authorities. MascA Classified Deposition of Raymond Rocca, PP. 32-33.1 6SEEp 9& for ty (13) Therefore,Rocca concluded, the areas the CIA tended to concentrate on concerned the Soviets: Go topi-/ofe continuation of text *In fact, dwill wrent the years, eight months! in the Souiet Union. PET 000017 2000920 Elasified by derivation: --- ## Page 21 9a Classification: - SECRET This gi witt (is ferm is te be used for material entrasted 04 pill. From ElA centrelled documents. *The following exchange between Mr. Rocca and Committee counsel sheds, further light on the difficulties encountered by the Agency. "reLated torts investigation of possible Cuban involvement in the assassination: Mr. Goldsmith. Earlier, when I asked you which areas of the case received emphasis, I believe that you indicated that on balance the primary area of emphasis was the Soviet connection. Mr. Rocca. That was certainly the one that I would say dominated - looking at it from my point of view. Mr. Goldsmith. Now, had you known about the anti- Castro assassination plots on the part of the CIA, would you have given more priority, more emphasis, to the possibility of a Castro conspiracy to kill the President? Mr. Rocca. Again, I say that it would have simply intensified it, that there was attention given to it, not particularly by the staff. I had no capabilities on the Cuban side. The organization of their service and their operation in Mexico was something entirely entirely (sic) within - it was an enigma at the time. They were just getting started. This was Wils area. This was in LAgnin copiece Scotes area of So the defectors had only begun to come out and they, defectors. ame out later, the Cuban Agencie Gunpone te So, I can't - I really can't say that (a) the Cuban connection was ignored, because it wasn't. The press was filled with it at the time. The Harker interview should have been undoubtedly given greater attention in a generalized sense; but it was given specific attention, I was told at the time of the Rockefeller thing. Mr. Goldsmith. In what way was the Cuban connection investigated? Mr. Rocca. I don't know. I don't know this. That side of the report strikes me as being inadequate. Crassification: 000018 2060636 Classified by derivation: Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 22 - 9b - Elassification: - SECRET (his form is 18 be used for material exisaated 178m ElA centralled decurents) Mr. Goldsmith. Well, when I said to what extent was the Cuban connection investigated, I don't mean by the Warren Commission. I mean to what extent did the Agency provide Mr. Rocca. That I can't answer. I certainly didn't, do it. Mr. Goldsmith. Pardon me? MI. Rocca. We certainly didn't, in R & A. Mr. Goldsmith. So, CI/R & A did not -- Mr. Rocca. Go into the Cuban side of it at all. This was something left to the people who were concerned specifically with Cuban intelligence and security operation. Mr. Goldsmith. But I believe earlier we established that Mr. Helms gave orders that information pertinent to the assassination was to go through your office, correct? Mr. Rocca. Yes. Mr. Goldsmith. And once information pertinent to the assassination went through your office, I take (it) you or Mr. Helms would decide what information would be relevant for the Warren Commission to see. Is that correct? Mr. Rocca. Well = Mr. Goldsmith. Based upon what you knew? Mr. Rocca. Well, everything would go, yes. Mr. Goldsmith. Therefore, you were in the position, it would seem, to know what information was being generated in the field that was going to the Warren Commission. Earlier I asked you which area received emphasis and I believe you indicated that the Soviet area (did). SE Elassificati8R: = 000013 2050837 Cassitled by derivation: Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 23 Elassificatien: sec urais form is to be used for material exterated from ElA centralled decuments:y Mr. Rocca. Primarily, primarily. But I didn't mean by that that it excluded the Cuban, because there was a lot of material that came through and went to the Commission that concerned the Cubans. Mr. Goldsmith. Let's go off the record. (Discussion off the record.) Mr. Goldsmith. Let's continue. Mr. Rocca. My recollection is that at the time the great press manifestation was that Cuban exiles who were in touch with CIA had been somehow involved in this. This was the great concern. Mr. Goldsmith. That's another possibility. There are different - CApering tigerabout MI. Rocca. Questions went down to WH: have anybody who could possibly have gotten involved in this kind of thing. There was extraordinary diligence, I thought, exercised to try to clarify that side. Mr. Goldsmith. Do you think that the possibility of an assassination plot by Castro against the President was adequately investigated? (Pause) Mr. Rocca. With the advantages of 20-20 hind- sight, I could say probably not. But at the time it seems to me that they gave due attention to it - within the information that I had at my disposal. Goes mo? 9 **In fact, (October HO spent 2 years, 8 months in the Soviet Union 1959 - June 19621 ElassificatisA: 009020 20.0633 Classitied by derivation: Classified derivation: --- ## Page 24 Elassification: - 10a - SECRET This form is i be mee me materia eaten f78PA ElA— EgRiFalled scuments:) Oswald... (Angleton, p. 86) estated for the record with rega roto the Warren Commission's investigation praise? (with the CIA's support) of possible Cuban involvement i in the assassination: (38) I personally believe that the United inadequate. a i A States intelligence services did not have the capabilities to ever come to an adjudication (of the Cuban aspect) • 27 I don't think the capabilities were there. (ASCA ClassIlled Deposition of James Angleton, 10/5/78 p. 93) Trid Chock-tis page i comforte Elassification: 000022 2000610 Easified by derivation: --- ## Page 25 Elassification: 11- ¿This f8rm is 18 be ysed per material extracted (39) As noted above, the CI Staff assumed responsibility in late December 1963 - early January 1964 for the coordination of CIA efforts to assist the Warren Commission in its investigation. At that time, Raymond Rocca, Chief of Research and Analysis for CI Staff» was designated point of contact with the warren Commission® (sch chases sied deposition ve semes Angleton, 10/5/98, D. 17.1 Rocca's Research and Analysis component was concerned with: (40) "analytical intelligence, analytical brainpower, which meant all source, all overt source comprehension; a study of cases that had ceased to occupy opera- tional significance, that is, closed cases, to maintain the ongoing record of overall quality and quantity of counterintelligence being performed by the entire DDP operational component; the Deputy Director foF Plant 7/17778 assified Deposition of B. Rocca See also HSCA Classified Deposition of James Angleton, 10/5/78, p. 77.): (41) Mr. Rocca testified that assassination-related information generated by CIA components was directed to his staff (as designated point of contact with the Warren Commission) in the normal flow of day to day 000023 Elassification: 20:0621 derivation: derivation: --- ## Page 26 - 12 This form is to be used for materia extracted •cument: work (Fbid., pp. 16-17.) This information was then reviewed by Rocca or his assistants who included LAjen eggi Empirigh Thomas-Hatt, (Soviet Expert), Paul Hartman (general research and search man for the U.S. Intelligence Community and its resourcesif, and liar Deoley Deoley twho had transferred to the CIA from the FBI a number of years prior to the assassination) (Ibid. p. 17.) During the course of the Warren Commission investi- gation, Hall Hartman and Dooley worked with those that deser CIA divisions producing substantive information related to the assassination (Ibid.) (42) Mr. Rocca testified that even though CI/R&A was the Agency's point of reference with regard to the Warren Commission, neither his staff nor the CI staff in general displaced the direct relations of Mr. Helms or any other concerned Agency official with the Warren Commission MIbid.; Rocca testified that neither CI Staff nor his staff displaced the CIA's Soviet Division (represented by David Murphy, Chief of the 000024 Alassification: - 2060625 Elasified By derivation: --- ## Page 27 13 Classification: - "This form is 18 be used dor material extrated 33 SR division and his assistant, Tennant Bagley) in Its contact with the Commission; nor did CI/R&A displace John Scelso in his contact with the Warren Commission. Rocca testified that in some instances indicated J. Lee Rankin of the Warren Commission would go directly to Helms with requests, and in other instances David Slawson, a Commission Staff counsel, conferred directly with Tom fair of Rocca's staff. (Ibid. p. 363) (43) The record reveals that on certain issues of particular sensitivity Rocca was not permitted to act as the Agency's point of contact with the Warren Commission. He testified that "compartmentalization was observed notwithstanding the fact that I was the working level point of contact. (HSCA Classified Deposition of Raymond 34 * Although James Angleton functioned as Rocca's direct superior during the course of the Warren Commission investigation, he did not participate on a regular basis in the Agency's efforts to supply substantive IT/ liaised information to the Warren commission nor did he deal our saline on a direct basis with Warren Commission representa tives. (excepting Allen Dulles on an unofficial basis; p. 17-181 HECA Classified Deposition of James 10/5/78, P. 782) However, Angleton testified to this need etassified Deposition of Raymond Rocca, Angleton?, Houseletcon (JFK +98 Paci 0101720) Committee that he did attempt to keep apprised of developments as the investigation progressed through consultation with Rocca. (HSCA Classified Deposition of James Angreton, 10/5/78, p. 81) , p81) Classification: 000625 20:0625 assifted lassitied 2y derivation: ay derivation: --- ## Page 28 "This form is to be used for material extranted fF8m ElA cantrailed documents+) 35 Rocca, 8/17/78, p. 18) occa cited by way of example the case of the Soviet defector Nosenko. Rocca testified that he did not attend any of the Agency =30 discussions pertaining to Nosenko's case Ibid.) Rather, fas it affected the Warren Commission investi- gation! responsibility for the Nosenko caselwas assigned to batta manpay, Chierof SR Division, in addition to Richard Helms. (Ibid) 37 (44) Rocca described the CI staff mail intercept program, HTLINGUAL, as a second example of an Agency matter about which he had no knowledge nor input.visavi 38 the Agency's support tale to the warred Commission. (Ibid., pp. 19-20. Rather, James Angleton and- the Prippingen 31 handled the disposition of this particular, material (HSCA Classified Deposition of J. Scelso, 5/16/78, P. 113, wherein Scelso states that CI Staff including was: repository of HILINGUAL intercepts; but see NSCA Class Dep. of 7/20/78 warren commission states that he did not o/78, Pineer to provide the HT WINSuAn program. Classificati®A: 20:062? 000026 derivation: Classified by deriation: --- ## Page 29 Elassificatien: SECRET (This farm is 18 be used for material extrasted (Y5) In summary, it was Rocca's testimony that an internally decentralized information reporting function best 40 characterized the organization of this second phase of the Agency's investigative efforts to assist the Warren Commission, (Fbid., p. '10; HSCA Classified Deposition of James Angleton, 10/5/78, p. 75, 80. See also CIA Doc. Rocca Memo for Record, 1 April 1975, Subject: Conversation with David W. Belin, April 1, o 1978, wherein it is stated that Helms remained senior official in charge of the overall investigation, with CI staff acting as a coordinator and repository of information collected.) 552. Elassification: 000027 26:0623 der yatior Classiffed By derivatior --- ## Page 30 ClassificatisA: See ret used for material extracted from controlled rocuments trom -controlled ocuments Il The Warren Com Sion =2iA Working Relatzerstr A. Opinions of Warren Commission and CIA Representatives Regarding Warren Commission-CIA Relationship (46) The Committee has contacted both representatives of the Warren Commission staff and those representatives of the CIA who played significant roles in providing CIA- generated information to the Warren Commission. The general consensus of these representatives is that the 41 Warren Commission and the CIA enjoyed a successful working relationship during the course of the Commission's investigation. (HSCA Class. Depo. Of R. Rocca 7/17/78, p. 18) (See also Exec. Sess. Test. of Richard Helms, 8/9/78, 5p1,24. ) William Coleman, a senior staff counsel for the Warren Commission who worked closely with Warren Commission staff counsel W. David Slawson on matters which utilized the CIA's resources, characterized the CIA representatives with whom he dealt as •.. highly competent, cooperative, and intelligent. (See HSCA staff interview of William Coleman, 8/2/78 Mr. Slawson expressed a similar opinion regarding the Agency's cooperation and quality 000028 2000517 Elasified By derivation: Ce Berk --- ## Page 31 Lassification lassitication Secre (This form is to be used for material extracted trom Cram controlled 488umeht haterial extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) -10- 43 of work. (Executive Session Testimony of W. David Slawson, 11/15/77, P. 17isee also JFK Exhibit 23.) (47)J. Lee Rankin, General Counsel for the Warren Comnission, testified that the Warren Commission and its staff were assured by the CIA that the Agency would cooperate in the Commissi work (HSCA Class. Depo. of J. Lee Rankin, 8/7/78, p.4; HSCA Class. Depo. of John McCone, 8/17/78, p. 9) John McCone, Director of Central Intelligence at the time of President Kennedy's assassination and during the Warren Commission investigation, supported Mr. Rankin's testimony in this regard by characterizing the CIA's work vis-a-vis the Warren Commission-as both responsive and comprehensive (SCA Class. Depo. of John McCone, 8/17/78, p. 5) Mr. McCone was responsible for ensuring that all relevant matters were see yellow pad changes 44 000029 Le lat 20:0513 Clessified by derivation: C. Berk --- ## Page 32 assurication assitication (This form is to be used for material extracted tols carm confPoiled ysecuments aterial extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) -10a- (49) conveyed by the SIA the Warren Commission. (Ibid., pp. 5=6)) In this regard, Mr. McCone testified that: The policy of the CIA was to give the Warren Commission everything that we had. I personally asked Chief Justice Warren to come to my office and took him down to the vault of our building where our information is microfilmed and stored and showed him the procedures that we were following and the extent to which we were giving him - giving his staff everything that we had, and arthr he was quite satisfied. (Ibia., p.9)- 47 (50) Materials Be Made Promptly Available By CIA To Warren Commission (51) Mr. Raymond Rocca, • fis daninglerdinnerter of ClA the Warren Commission investigation, characterized the Agency's role as one of full support to the Warren Commission. Mr. Rocca, who served as the Chief of the Research and 009030 @tessifliction:_ 2060513 Classified by derivation: Berk --- ## Page 33 Classification: - Seer Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted trons dieta contpolled dedurentsnaterial extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) -10b Analysis Divison for the Counter-Intelligence Staff of the CIA, stated under oath that Richard Helms had given the following directive: 52) 11 material bearing in anyway that could be of assistance to the Warren Commission should be seen by cIf staff and R and A and marked for us. He issued very, very strictly worded lastructions indications -they were verbal in so far as I know — that we were to leave no stone unturned. (ASCA Class. Depo. of Raymond Rocca, 7/17/78, p. 24) 118 000031 2000520 01%.- cret Elassified by derivation C. Berk --- ## Page 34 Classification: - 119 (53) ME. ROCHAis afrAds thater used finchermlaraded Mr. Helms! lers were followla to tole deters by all CIA employees. Ibid. p. 24. • Mr. Rocca concluded that on this basis: was to turn over and to develop any information bearing on the assassination that could be of assistance to the Warren Conmission." Ibia., p. 26. (5x) A different view of the CIA's role regarding the supply of CIA's information to the Warren Commission was propounded by Richard, Helms. Mr. Helms, who served as the CIA's Deputy Director for Plans during the Warren Commission investigation, was directly responsible for the CIA's investigation of President Kennedy's assassination antthe tablishment of ch patiay visa ris the warren Commission. (Ibid., p. 23 He testified to the Committee that the CIA made every effort to be as responsive as possible too Warren Commission requests (Exec. Sess. Text. of Richard Helms, 8/9/78, p. 10 • Helms added further testimony regarding the manner in which the CIA provided its infor- mation to the Warren Commission. He stated: (55) (56) An inquiry would come over (from the Warren Com mission). We would attempt to respond to it. But these inquiries came in individual bits and pieces or as individual items...Each individual item that came along we toot care of as best we (Ibid., pp. 10-11 However, it was Mr. Helms' recollection that the CIA provided information to the Warren Commission primarily 53 Classification: SEEKET. 000032 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 35 Classification: SECRET on the basis dhither drut sits fos peterial extralests. Under from ClA-controlled documents.) oath he supported this proposition: Mr. Goldsmith: In summary, is it your position that the Agency gave the Warren Commission information only in response to speci- fic requests by the Warren Commission? Mr. Helms: That is correct. I want to modify that by saying that memory is fallable. There may have been times or circumstances under which some- thing different might have occured, but my recollection is that we were attempting to be-responsive and supportive to the FBI and the Warren Commission. When they asked for something we gave it to • them. As far as our volunteering information is concerned, I have no recollection of whether we volunteered it or not (Ibid., p. 34 157) Mr. Helms' characterization of fulfilling Warren Commission requests on a caserbasis rather than uniformly volunteering relevant information to the Warren Commission stands in direct opposition to J. Lee Rankin's perception of the CIA's investigative responsibility. MI. Rankin was asked by Committee Counsel whether he worked under the impression that the Agency's responsibility was simply to respond to questions that were addressed to CIA by the Warren Commission. In response, Mr. Rankin testified as follows: (58) Not at all and if anybody had told me that I would have insisted that the Commission com- municate with the President and get a different arrangeclassificatione might not ask the right SECRET Classified by deridi0. 0 0 33 --- ## Page 36 Classitication: sectet lassitication: (This form is to be used for material extracted Nots Cram toniPoled usseumehtshaterial extracted trom ClA-controlled documents. -13- 55 (59) B questions and then we would not have the information and that would be absurd. (HSCA Class. Depo. of J. Lee Rankin, 8/17/78, p. 4) MI. Slawson added support to Rankin's position testifying that Warren Commission requests to the CIA were rarely specific. "The request was made initially that they give us all information pertinent to the assassination investigation. J (Exec. Sess. Test. of W. David Slawson, 11/15/77, p. 29) CIA's faiter to Discles: 214 inti Eutro Abusinatina pinine to Narcen commission 56 (60) in unfortunate consequence of partin donnission @liane a trecia to provide tu CIA mitirill isreflecrelii the subsequent exposure of the CIA's anti-Castro assassination plots LTSSC Book V) see also (Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders, Interim Report, SSC, 11/20/75)/. aradoxiently, even if the von had requested int tior on such The recordreveals that the me CIA's point of contact with the Warren Commission Khame be o provide the 2030521 Camified by derivations 000034 C. Berk --- ## Page 37 Classification: Secre lassification: (This form is to be used I for material extracted fretir denm iontrolted urseurtentsmaterial extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) -13a- Comun i Informatio "SO" TEqueSted.As MI/soca's testamony reveáls, sea no knowledge at the time of the Warren Commission investigation of Agency efforts to assassinate Fidel Cástro. CESCA Class Depo. of Raymona Bocca, 7/17/78, p. 509 geep. 34 5 trailinastie 20.0522 000037 Classified by dermation: C. Berk --- ## Page 38 Classification: SECRE (This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA - controlled documents.) Had RoceT, as the CIA's working level representative to the warren Comission, been requested by the conmission to research and report on an and all dele CIA ánti-Castro assassination operations, Rocca's this welling sut efforts would have produced no substantive informa- tion. (Ibid., p. 497. cate (611 The record bed reve als that the CiA desk officer who was initially given the responsibility by Mr. Helms to investigate Lee Harvey Oswald, and the assassination of President Kennedy had no knowledge of such plots during his investi- sedical cation. (45cA C Dego 08 50m 566150. 5/16/78 pp. 73, 111-112)y Mr. Scelso testified that had he rown of such assassination plots the following action would have been taken: 662) (63) "We would have gone at that hot and heavy. We would have queried the agent (AMIASH) about it in great detail. I would have had him polygraphed by the best operative security had to see if he had (sic) been a double-agent, informing Castro about our poison pen things, and so on. would have had all our Cuban sources queried about it." (Ibid., p. 166) 4174445 As the record reflects, these plots were known by few within the CIA. Mr. Helms' testimony regarding 00003 Classification: SECRET starse Seleet Comm chu- 014720 *See also HSCA 0106526101 Deposition . of James Angleton, 10/ 5/78, pp.22 wherein Angleton states thut ned datiled by demaior store toassusine Fider Gistro antir atro nesarinconnission da --- ## Page 39 emphasis Classification: 53Y ẾT (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) these plots reveals that the Agency compromised the policy of its pirestor Les promise to supply all relevant information to (sEx statementot son Mutant, ploaherein) the Warren Commission. The following exchange between Comnittee Counsel and Mr. Helms illustrates the extent Mr. Goldsmith: ¡of the Agency's compromise: Mr. Helms, I take it from your testimony that your position is that the anti-Castro plots, in fact, were relevant to the Warren Commission's work; and, in light of that, the Committee would like to be informed as to why the warren Commission was not told by you of the anti- Castro assassination plots. Mr. Helms: I have never been asked to testify before the Warren Commission about our operations. Mr. Goldsmith: If the Warren Commission did not know of the operation, it certainly was not in a position to ask you about it. Is that not true? Mr • Helms: Yes, but how do you know they did not know about it? How do you know Mr. Dulles had not told them? How was I to know that? And besides, I was not the Director of the Agency and in the CIA, you did not go traipsing around to the Warren Com- mission or to Congressional Committees or to anyplace else without the Director's permission. Mr. Goldsmith: Did you ever discuss with the Director whether the warren Commission should be informed of the anti-Castro assassination lots? Classification: S Classified by derivation: 1 0 0.037 --- ## Page 40 16 Classification: — (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA - controlled documents.) Mr. Helms: I dia note as far as I recall AHSCA Exec. Sess. Test: or Richard helms. 8/9/18, PP. 30-31-4, emphasis Added, Mr. McCone testifed that he first became aware of the CIA's anti-Castro assassination plots involving CIA-Mafia ties during August 1963. He stated that upon learning of these plots he directed that the. Agency cease all such activities. (HSCA Class. Depc. of John McCone, 8/17/78, P. 13) When asked whether the CIA desired to withold informa- tion from the Warren Commission about the Agency anti- Castro assassination plots to avoid embarrassing the Agency or causing an international crises he gave the following response: "I cannot answer that since they (CIA employees knowledgeable of the continuance of such plots) withheld the information from. me. I cannot answer that question. I have never been satisfied as to why they with held--the-information-from me..Ibid. p. 16) Regarding the relevancy of such plots to the Warren Commission's work,. Warren Commission counsels Rankin, Slawson and spector were in agreement that such information should have been reported to the U 660 677 Classification: Classified by deriv B.0 0 38 --- ## Page 41 Classification:. SESSKETI (This form i seque dater petrial of fact de Runkin, 8/117/73, from CIA -contrplpaidocentents.) warren Commission. (Exec. Sess. Test. of w. David Slawson, 11/15/77, p. 27; Exec. Sess. Test. of Arlen Spector 11/8/77, pp. 45-46; CF, Exec. Sess. Test. of Wesley Liebeler, 11/15/77, p. 71 where he states that possible witholding of information by CIA about Agency attempts to assassinate Castro did not significantly affect Warren Commission- investigation) From the CIAls-perspective, MI. Rocca testified that had he known of the anti-Castro assassination plots his efforts to explore the possibility of a retaliatory assassination against President Kennedy by Castro would have been intensi- fied. He stated that: " a completely different procedural approach probably would and should have been taken." (HSCA Class. Depo. of Raymond Rocca 1/17/78, p. 45) John Scelso, the above-cited CIA desk officer who ran the CIA's initial investigation of President Kennedy's assassination until that responsibility was given to the CIA's counterintelligence staff, offered a highly critical appraisal of Helms' non-disclosure to the Warren Commission: Classification: 55 fI Classified by derivation: 0D0039 --- ## Page 42 Classification: - SEAT. (This form is to be used for. material extracted from ClA - controlled documents.) Mr. Goldsmith: Do you think Mr. Helms was acting properly when he failed to tell the Warren Commission about the assassination plots? Mr. Scelso: No, I think that was a morally highly reprehensible act, which he cannot possibly justify under his oath of office, or any other standard of professional public ic service. (HSCA Class. Depo. of John Scelso, 5/16/78 170 II. D. Lage: Respecsibi lisprotection Agency Coneern/for the Sanctity of Sensitive Sources and Methods - Factors Affecting CIA Resporse to Warren Commission Requests The length of time required by the CIA to respond to the Warren Commission's requests for information was dependent upon 1) the availability of information;... "2) the complexity of the issues presented by the request and 3) the extent to which the relevant information touched upon sensitive CIA • -. sources and methods. On the first two points, Mr. Helms testified that when CIA(had been) able to satisfy a Commission request, the CIA would then send a reply back: mand some of these inquiries obviously took longer than others. For example, some might avolve. Classification: - 000040 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 43 defete Unles AY in 1! and wist, Classitication: - SERgEL (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) checking a file which was in washington. Other inquiries might involve trying to see if we could locate somebody in some overseas country: Obviously, one takes longer to per- form than the other. Exec. Sess. Test öf Richard Helms, 8/9/78, p. 20 At Ines-ther fals concern for protecting its sensitive sources and methods caused the Warren Commission to expérience greater difficulty in getting relevant information than when the protec- tion of such sources and methods was not at issue. iOn Occasion, J. Lee rankin expressed the opinion that the Agency's effort to protest it seare sources and ethods partieten affectedthe guality of the information to which the Warren Commission and its staff were given access. 27- p. 23) (ASCA Class. Depo, of J. Lee Rankin 8/17/78, "howeve, As a result of the ChA-s Goneern, in some instances the Agency made initially Limit accessptO CIA Materials by the Commission T73 (ASEA ClasS. De Depo. Of John Scelso, 5/16/78, P. 158) The Committee has identified two areas of concern in which the Agency's desire to protect Its sensitive sources and methoas pelickthe fazen Commission's investigation. These are: Classification: Đ00041 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 44 Initially Classification: - SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.). cal sover materals witholding information from the warren Commission Oswald's trip pertaining to the photo- se refia litta telephonio surveillance operations of the CIA's Mexico City Station 2) As a related consideration, the Agency's relucter. Gity Myste Man dev CAsInitial Concern for Revealing Sensitive Sources intMetroils The CIA's concern for revealing the existence soure and methods of sensitive technioal operations as outlined abover evident from the inception of the Warren Commission. Mr • Scelso commented that "we were not authorized [semitive at first to reveal all our (technica) operations." (Ibid., p. 158) But Scelso did testify that: We were going to give them intelligence reports which derived from all our sources, including technieel sources, including the telephone intersept and the information gotten from the interrogation of Silvia Duran, for example, which corresponded 75 almost exactly with the information from the telephone intercepts. Fbid. ) Mr: Scelsco's characterization is supported by examination of the background to the first major CIA report furnished the Warren Commission regarding Classification: - -==277 000042, Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 45 Classitication: - SECREL This. form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) Lee Harvey Oswald's trip to Mexico City. ICIA DOC: FOIA #509-803, 1/31/64/ Memorandum for J. Lee Pankin from Richard Helms) Much of the information provided to the Warren Commission in this report was based upon sensitive sources and methods, identification of which had been deleted completely from the report. The CIA policy limiting Warren Commission knowledge of CIA sources and methods was articu- sensitie dance and merited) lated as early as December 20, 1963, at which time a cable was sent from CIA headquarters to the Mexico City Station which stated: Our present plan in passing information to the Warren Commission is to eliminate mention Oftelephone taps, in order to protect your continuing ops. Will rely instead on statements of Silvia Duran and on contents of which Soviets gave oXeet fonsular file (CIA DOCHFOIA #420-75712/20/63 Dir 90466) % The basic policy articulated in the December 20, 1963 cablenis also set forth in a CIA memorandum of December 10, 1963 as it specifically concerned the CIA's relations with the FBI. -CIA Memorandum for File, 12/20/63, included in with Soft file materials) In that memorandum, C'A employer of the CIA Counterintelligence/Special Investigations Group StElassification e had bell advised by san. Classified by derivation: 000043 --- ## Page 46 SECRET Classification: - (This form is to be used for material extracted Papich, FBforhialÁseonttaledblecutents.) that the FBI was anticipating a reguest from the Warren Commission for copies of the FBI's materials which supported or complimented the FBI's five volume report of December 9, 1963 that had been submitted to the Warren Comnission. Papich provided with this report which indicated that some United States Agency was lept tetepfores in Mexico and asked him whether the FBI could supply the this operettan. Warren Commission with the source of the telephone 7[Ammemorandum shows that he discussed this matter with Scelso. After a discussion with Helms, Scelso was directed by Helms to prepare CIA material to be passed to the Warren Commission. wrote made.. the fallowing it-latio regarding SECRAT 000044 Classification: Classified by derivation: - 40474 --- ## Page 47 ok SECRET Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) He (Scelso) was quite sure it was not the Agency's desire to make available Gensitive source to the Commission at least in this manner-via the FBI-sensitive informa- tion which could relate to telephone taps. CIA Memo for File, 12/20/63, by included in Soft File materials)* cap/hond other wish card -.O! The opinion expressed by Scelso as of December 20, 1963 was set forth on January 14, 1964 in a formalized fashion, When Helms expressed his concern regarding exposure by the FBI of Agency sources to the Warren Commission. Helms wrote that the CIA had become aware that the FBI had already: called to the attention of the Commission, through its attorney, that we have information [las deter-. mined from Agency sources) coinciding with the dates when Oswald was in Mexico City and which may have some bearing on his activities while in that area. CIA # CSCI 377797 #66 4/74-191 Mr. Helms further indicated that the CIA might be called upon to provide additional information acquired from checks of CIA records and agency sources. He suggested that certain policies be employed to enable CIA to work cooperatively with the Commission in a manner which would protect CIA information, sources and methods. Among the policies articulated were two which Helms claimed would enable the Agency to control the flow of Agency originated information. In this way the CIA could check the possibility of revealing its sources and methods inadvertantly. The policies articulated were: SECRAT Classification: 000045 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 48 ok S/24 dinaris: 05 Classification: CIA HAS NO CBJECTION TO DECLASSIFIGATION AND/OR (This form is to be used for material extracted RELEASE OF THIS DOGUMENT from ClA-controlled documents.) The CIA policy of eliminating reference to Agency sensitive sources and methods is further revealed by examination of an Agency cable, dated January 29, 1964, sent from CIA Headquarters to the CIA Mexieo citystation: fICIA DOC. FOIA 7398-204, 1/29/60 DIR 97829) This cable indicated that knowledge of Agency sources "and techniques was still being with- held from the Warren Commission, and stated that on Saturday, February 1, 1964, the CIA was to present a report on Oswald's Mexico City activities to the 80 Warren Commission which would be in a form protective of the CIA's Mexico City Station's sources and techniques? (Ibid.). 78/ (Footnote cont'a from pg. 23.) 1) Your Bureau not disseminate information re- ceived from this Agency without prior concur- rence 2) In instances in which this Agency has provided information to your Bureau and you consider that information is pertinent to the Conmission's interest, and/or compliments (sich or otherwise is pertinent to information developed or received by your Bureau through other sources and is being provided by you to the Commission, you refer the Commission to this Agency. In such cases it will be appreciated if you will advise us of such referral, in order that we may anticapate. the possible denture interest of the furle commis prasaratory steps to meeting its needs. (Ibid. jack. Classified by derivation: 00046 --- ## Page 49 A3/075 125- dest dance 22:26 Classification:. (This form is to be used for materia! extracted from ClA controlled documents.) Telephone Taps Mr. Helms offered testimony regarding the CIA's reticence to inform the Warren Commission, at least during. the initial stage of the Commission's work, of the CIA's telephonic and photo surveillance operations in Mexico City. The reason for the sensitivity of these telephone.taps.and surveillance-was not only becuase it was sensitive from the Agency's standpoint, but the telephone taps were cunningn conjunction with the Mexican authorities and therefore, if this had become public knowledge, it would have caused very bad feelings between Mexico and the Unitedstates. and that was the reason (Exec. Sess. Test. of Richard Helms, 8/9/78, pp. 51-52. The CIA's unwillingness to inform the Warren commission in the early stages of its investigation of the above-described surveillánce operations is a source, of concern to this committee. It is indicative of an Agency policy designed to skew In its favor the form and substance of information the CIA felt uncomfortable providing the warren Commission. (HSCA Class. Depo. of John Scelso, 5/6/78, p. 158) This process might well have hampered the Commission's ability to proceed in 8 Classification: 000047 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 50 8 ol. - 26 SECKZL Classification: its investion on ontole d material extracted before it. As noted previously, on January 31, 1964, the CIA provided the Warren Commission with a 83 7921 memorandum that chronicled Lee Harvey Oswald Mexico City visit during September 26,71963 October 3, 1963. That memoranduded not mentionan old tai is coin!? that Oswald's various conversations with the Cuban in Mexico, and Soviet Embassy/Consulates had been tapped and by the Agency's Mexico City Station subsequently transcribed? Furthermore, that memo- randum did not mention that the CIA had tapped and transcribed conversations between Cuban Embassy employee Sylvia Duran and Soviet officials at the Soviet Embassy/Consulate nor was mention madé of the conversations between cuban President. Dórticos and Cubán Ambassador to Mexico Armas which the CIA had also tapped and transcribed.) On February 1, 1964, Helms appeared before the Many hase Cormission and Hikely discussed che memorandum of 3 January 31, 1964. SicIa: DOC. FOIA 7498-204, 1/25/641 DIR 97829) On February TO 964 Lee Rankin wrote Helns in regard to the CIA memorandum of January 31. (JFK DOC. NO. 3872 A review of Rankin's letter delete 8Y Classification: SECRET 000048 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 51 senditive - Classification: - SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) indicates that as of his writing, the Warrer internatase 0.222 ommission had no substantire knowledge of th sensitive arce emeter that had nethe telephonie surveillance uperation or the production the, formed Onscripts from that operation. Rankin inquired in the February 10, 1964 letter whether Oswald's direct communication with employees of the Soviet Embassy (as stated in Paragraph 1 of January 31 memorandum) had been facilitated by Millar lephone terview. Manifestly, had the Warren senife sonia died Commission been informed of the telephonic surveillance operation and its suecess in tapping swald, this inquiry by Rankin would not have been made. Raymond Rocca's testimony tends to support this conclusion. It was Rocca's recollection that between the time period of January 1964 - April 1964, Warren Commission's representatives had visited the CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virginia and had been shown various Mauseripes resulting from the CIA Elephonies ance operations in Mexico City • (ESCA Class. Depo. of Raymond Rocca, 7/17 p. 39) However, Mr. Rocca did not personally make 86 Classification: Classified by derivation: 000049 --- ## Page 52 28 Classification: - SEGRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) this material available to Commission representa- tives and was not able to state under oath precisely the point in time at which the Warren Commission first learned of these operations. (Ibid.) 87 83 On February 19, 1964 the CIA responded to ( CD 384, FOLA NO: 553-80814 Rankin's inquiry of February 10. The Agency response did indicate that Oswald had phoned the Soviet Consulate and was also interviewed at the still disl not reveal Consulate. However, the Agency neither revealed the source of this information, in its response to the Commission nor indicated that this source would be revealed by other means fe.g. by ofal briefing) (Ibia 188 densitive Optiotising Warren Commission Knowledge of CIA Telephonic Surveillance During the period of March - April 1964, David Slawson drafted a series of memoranda which among other issues concerned Warren Commission know- ledge of and access to the production material sensitive operations derived from the CIA telephonie surveillance operations • in Mexico City. A review of these memoranda tends to support the Committee's belief that the warren Commission, through Mssrs. Slawson, Coleman, and Classification: Classified by derivation: 000050 --- ## Page 53 Corich. Classification: SECRET iginalsonnes and willer thisalemdttoobta decegerial restedelephonic Duca from ClA - controlled documents.) surveillance materials until April 9, 1964. On that date, Coleman, Slawson and Willens met with Win scott, the CIA"s eniero eulathen Mexico raw data city, who provided them with various transeripts and translations derived from A teteprenticaps of the Cuban and Soviet-Embassy/Consulates A slawson Memorandum of April 22, 1964, Subject: Trip to Mexico City p22) perman -PriOrto April 9, it appears doubtful that the Commission had been given even ire tel access, to thel referenced material. Nevertheless, by March 12, 1964, the record indicates that the Warren Commission had at least become aware that the CIA. 9 did maintain telephonic surveillance of the cuban 21440601 Embassy/Consulate. (Slawson merorandum, March 12, (1964, Subj: meeting with CIA representatives) . Slawson's memorandum of March 12 reveals that. the Warren reporter Commission had learned that the CIA possessed tran- inforte scripte of conversations between the Cuban Ambassadol al to Mexico, Armas, and the Cuban President Dorticos The 91 Dorticos-Armas conversations, requested by the Marrer whichihadbeen summarized inthe T(31/01) A DO FAN # 509-803, whilein Classification: ECRET # Slawson sten inter drenche this Committee stated that me be came aware of the exis classified by derivation: 000051 16:p citi andis sCre dur lister --- ## Page 54 SECRET: Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted AMAS O CSJECTION TO DEGLASSIFICATION AND/OR from ClA-controlled documeite Marita RELEASE OF THIS DOCUME Commission representatives at nitting; with CIA officials, including Richard Helms, concerned Silvia Duran's arrest and interrogation by the 9z Mexican Federal Police. •(Slawson Memorandam April 22, 1964, pp. 3, 19, 45-46)S Helms responded to the Commission's request for access, stating that he would attempt to arrange for the Warren cornission's representatives to review this material. 93 (Slawson Memorandum of March 12, 1964, p. 6)° Another Slawson memorandum, dated March 25, 1964 concerned Oswald's trip to Mexico. In that memo Slawson wrote that the tentative conclusions he had reached concerning Oswald's Mexico trip, were derived from CIA memoranda of January 31, 1964 anc. February 19, 1964, (Slawson Memorandum of March 25, 1964, p. 20) and, in addition, a Mexican federal police summary of interrogationsconducted shortly- after the assassinationwith - 5010a Durant teet Slawson wrote: large part of it (the summary report) is simply a summation of what the Mexican police learned when they interrogated Mrs. Silvia Duran, an employee of the Cuban Consulate in Mexico City, and is there- fore only as accurata as puran's testimony to the police. Ibid. 95 SECRET Classification: Classified by derivation:0000-52 --- ## Page 55 31 Classification: SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) These comments indicate that Slawson placed qualified reliance upon the Mexican police summary. Moreover, there is no indication that Slawson had raw data been provided the Duran telephonie in creept betion obtained by meand of scripts. In fact, by virtue of Slawson's comments concerning the Mexican police report, it would appear that the Warren Commission, as of March 25, had been provided little substantive information sensitate C.A duurch. and methis. pertaining to Silvia Duran. As Slawson reveals, the Commission had been forced to rely upon the two sensitive memoranda that did not make reference to the surveil- lance operations and a sunnary report issued by the Mexican Federal Police. Thus, the Agency had for over three months Prelude exposing nau sato estate pes on tected analisis concerned Warren Commission staff members. As was 3 ok stated in the CIA cable of December 20, 196f to its Mexico City Station: Our present plan in passing information [sensitie spiratisan to the Warren Commission is to eliminate nention of'erephone caps, in order to protect your continuing operatons. will rely instead on statements of Silvia Duran and on contents of Soviet consular file which soviets gave eDACID here. TCIA DOC. FOIA #420-757, DEC. : 20, 1964,3 Got An - A DIR 90466) ol State Deft SECRET state Deputie. 9 80 Classification: Classified by derivatid 0 9 053 --- ## Page 56 SECRET Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted Naw data from CIA - controlled documents.) parteining jurain The Committee's belief that Slawson had that not been given access to the Duran transcripts is further supported by reference to his memorandum of March 27, 1964 (eb 092) wherein he states his C14! conclusion that Oswald had visited the Cuban of Embassy on three occasions. (Ibid, pr?) This again conclusion, he wrote, was based upon an analysis of Silvia Duran's testimony before the Mexican police. This memorandum bears no indication that he had reviewed any of the Duran transtlipts. Furthermore, had Slawson been given access to these transcripts, certainly their substance would have been incorporated into Kis analysis and accordingly noted for this purpose. His analysis would have reflected the fact of his review either by its corroboratión or criticism of the above cited Mexican police summary report. Logically, access to the CIAl telephonic delete surveir mee odictor would hare clarifige some ambiguities. For example, on september 27, at 4:05 p.m. (Slawson Memorandam of April 21, 1964, Subj: Intereepts from Soviet and Cuban Embassies in Mexico, P. 2) puts..a encotsentence SECRZT Classification: 000054 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 57 Classification: SECRET silvia duraris therhoned the priderabad and stated that a/Amertille dos esently at the Cuban Embas: Sy requesting an in-transit visit to Cuba. Thas American was later determined by CIA analysts to be Oswald. /Again on september 28, at 11:51 a.m. Duran telepkoned the Soviet Consulate stating that an American, subseqdently identified by CIA analysts as Oswald was at the Cuban Embassy: corrob sting stage visit are Cuten Embassy Had this information been made available to Slawson, his calculatións of Oswald's activities in Mexico city would have been more firmly established than they were as of March 27, 1964. The record supports the Committee's finding that as of April 2, 1964 the Warren Commission had till not been given access to the above reterence originalsource materials. series of tetephone teresaitop now untor hair daisie ,; a memorandum of that date by Coleman and Slawson, posed one . question to the CIA and made two requestsfor information from the Agency, (Slawson - Coleman MemorandWI April 2, 1964, Subj: Questions Raised by the Ambassador Mann FileX Coleman and Slawson wrote: 1) What is the information source referred to in the November 28 telegram that SECRZI Classification: 000065 Classified by derivation:. --- ## Page 58 Classification: - SECRET Öswad intendedect dorsenteriel astastesh from ClA-controlled documents.) Odessa; sensitive 2) We would like to see copies of the raw datal transeripts of the intercepts, translated if possible, in all cases where the Law data! Intercepts reter to the assassination. sensitive renditine or related subjects; 3 We would especially like to see the raw data intercept in which the allegation tha money was passed at the Cuban Embassy is discussed (Ibia.) The question initially posed by (Item I) in the above-referenced memorandum of April 2 concerns a seniore sparatio.. then CIA terephonio intercept of September 27, 1963- * Sen at 10:37 a.m= f(Slawson Memorandum of April 21 1964, p. 1) Obviously, if Slawson found it necessary to request the source of the information, he had not as yet been provided access to the original material by the CIA. 100 Item Number Two of the above listing tends to show that the Connission had not been giving access the intercept concerning the assassination. Certain sensitive data SECRET Classification: 000056 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 59 Classification: - _ SECRAL (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) Item number three of the above listing sensitive reveals hat the int rept the Dorticos-Armas conversation of November 22, 1964, in which the passing of monies was discussed had not as of April 2 been provided to the Commission. The Commission information had specifically requested) the Dorticos Armas convergatior transcripts at a March 12, 1964 meeting between Commission representatives and. Agency representatives. 101 (Slawson memorandum, March 12, 1964, Subj: Conference with CIA on March 12, 1964) On April 3, 1964, Coleman and Slawson expressed their concern for receiving complete access to all materials relevant to Oswald's Mexico City trip: The most probable final result of the entire investigation of Oswald's activities in Mexico is a conclusion that he went there for the purpose of trying to reach Cuba and that no bribes, conspiracies, etc. took place. ... In order to make such a judgment (that all reasonable lines of investigation that might have uncovered other motivations or SECRET Classification: 0000574 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 60 CIA MAG NO OSJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION ANDIOR RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT Classification: SECRET, (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) possible conspiracies have been followed through with negative results), we must become familiar with the details of what both the American and Mexican investi- gatory agencies there have done. This means reading their reports, after trans- lation, if necessary, and in some cases talking with the investigators themselves. 10.2 (Slawson and Coleman Memorändum, April oK f3, 1964, Subj: Additional lines Investigation in Mexico Which May Prove Worthwhile, p. 11.) However, as the rand tends to show Manifestly, Coleman's and Slawson's desire rampedic for a thorough investigation had boon Imposed"the CIA's concern test Torexposureas subjeit to the a limitations sources and methods, however relevant to the Commission's investigation, be emposed. Considering the gravity and signi- ficance of the warren Commission's investigation; the the initial original sourer Agency'switholding of material from the Commission staff may have petapers ability to reach a curately reasoned conclusions meth serpent to Oswald's activities while in Mexico City. Classification: - 000058 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 61 4 57 Classification: - (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-contrelled documents.) On April 8, David Slawson, Howard Willens, and William Coleman flew to Mexico City, Mexico to meet with the representatives of the State 3 Department, FBI, CIA, and the Government of Mexico. (Slawson Menorandum, April 22, 1964, Subj: Trip Mexico City, P. l) Prior to their departure. they met with Thomas Mann, the U.S. Ambassador to Mexico during Oswald's visit to Mexico City and at™ 104 the time of President Kennedy's assassination. Ambassador Mann told the Warren Commission representa- about senile operation tives that the CIA's- Mexico City Station-was-actively engaged photosurveillance-operations against the • Soviet and Cuban Embassy/Consulates (Ibid., p. Upon the group's arrival in Mexico City, they ND were met by U.S. Ambassador Freeman, Claire Boonstra of the State Department, Clarke Anderson of the FBI, Lein africanses i 1060 and Winston scott Ethe CIA (Ibid. pp. 9-10)" That same day, during a meeting between the Commission kepresentatives and Win Seott-Scott made the raw dete informithile available to the group actual transcripts of the -CIA's peacheded con unis tadophonic surpidance operations accompanied pith or side decutione. 107 English translations-ofthe transe In addition, senitive Classification: 000059 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 62 38 CIA HAS NO CEJECTION TO /DECLASSIFICATION ANDIOR RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT Classification: - he provided the group CIA controller 480 Lie material strategraphs photogra for the time period covered by Oswald's visit. that had resulted fróm photosur i hane 108 Cuban and soviet Embassy entratces. Davia slawson wrote: D Mcfeett stated at the beginning of his narrative that he intended to make a complete disclosure of all facts, including the sources of his information, and that he understood that all three of us had been cleared for TOP SECRET and that we would not disclose beyond the confines of the Commission and its immediate staff the information we obtain- ed through him without first clearing it with his superiors in washington.y agreed to this." (Ibia.] The CIA diana entire stat Ma Scott described to the Commission repre- Meteo directly sentatives the CIA's course of action i: following the assassination, indicating that his staff immediately began to compile dossiers on Oswald, Duran, and everyone else throughout Mexico whom the CIA knew had had some contact with Oswald (Ibid.) Seett revealed that all known Cuban and Russian intelligence agents had quickly. been put under surveillance following the assassination. Slawson concluded : [CIA Representative'. "Scotts narrative plus the material we were shown disclosed immediately how incorrect our previous information had and men can ease state the soutet and Mexican Classification: Thereferene should bete Subar classified by dil0,0 50 --- ## Page 63 "CIA spresen eite 39 Classification: SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted distortionsorndledicaduns to which our information had been subjected had entered some place in Washington, because the CIA information that we [CIA on We had previously planned to show Soott, Slawson's reconstruction of Oswald's probable activities at the embassies to get Scott's opinion, but once we saw how badly distorted our information was we realized that this would be useless. Therefore, instead, decided to take as close notes as possible Irom the original source materials at some later time during our visit." (Ebias salads A separate Slawson nemorandum of April 2I, 1964 records the results of the notetaking from original source materials that he did following scott's disclosures. Esensitive now datal These notes dealt exclusively with the telephonic intercepts pertaining to the Duran and Oswald conver- sations tor the period sept. 27- 0ct. 1, 1963. CS 4/21/64. from the Soviet and Cuban Embassies in Mexico City. It is evident from Slawson's record that the retirene to proude the lette, Commission in. ta Agency's den. len at ot original source materials, in this case the telephonic surveillance intercepts, affecte impeived the Commission's ability to draw accurately reasoned conclusions regarding oswald's sofourn in Merco city. It meant that as of April Á0, 1964, Classification: SECRET Soto yellon legal odditions 000061 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 64 CIA HAS NO OSJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT de Q othe 40 Classification: - sicker This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) nearing the halfway point of the warren conmission 0011 1585340- investigation, the Commission forced to retrac the factual path by which it had structured Oswald's activities in Mexico City. It further revealed that the Agency had provided ambiguous information to the Comnission when, in fact "on almost all the crucial points" significantly more precise materials could haye been made available for analysis by the Commission. (Ibid.) Thus, the Agency's early policy ginal source of not/ providing the Commission with Nically retevant intortet on derived from assain sepsitive sources hamper en and methods had gerouslyades ned the investigation and/ possibly foreclosed lines of investigation e.g, Cuban involvement, that might have been more seriously considered had this material been expeditiously provided. Monitot Station ho poserstitine and the Merteo C On November 23, 1963, FBI Special Agent Odüm showed Marguerite Oswald a photograph of a man bearing no physical resemblance to her son (Warren Classification: Classified by derivatial. 0 0 0 5 2 --- ## Page 65 noneed to chara declds. pur- pases Some Agency Roce Classification: SECRET -114 commission here is tobag usefues mate tograg had beer roman controited documents. supplied to the FBI on November 22 by the CIA S 117 Mexico Gity StatIon-after Ageney representatives had searched their files in an effort to locate Ook Ibid. •117 information on Oswald. (CIA DOC. DDP4-1555, 3/25/64 @ok warren Conmission Doc. GAT this photograph, which was one in a series suing fron the CIA S photosurveillande K operations against the soviet and cuban Embassy comoriato Prior to the assassination, had been linked by the Mexico City Station to Lee Harvey Oswald. (Ibid Richard Helms, in a sworn affidavit before the Warren Commission, stated that the photograph shown to outside of the coid.io Marguerite oswald dal United red been take do the per 5963 July'i in Mexico City and mistakenly Linked-at-that-time-to 1963 to November 23, 1963- Oswald. /(Warren Commission Affidavit of Richard Helms 5119 ofwarterCominissianfter.ngs 8/7/64, Vol. XI, pp. 469-470) On February 101964, Marguerite Oswald testified before the Warren Commission and recounted the cir- cumstances under which she was shown the photograph. —лужарие :волоснеіна ТАМЕНАЛУіСІММ (Warren Commission Report Vol 1p153 Mrs. Oswald testified that she believed this photograph to have been of Jack Ruby. (Ibia. )): 0/21 12. Classification: S40/31 000053 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 66 Luck Reprisin Classification: - 42 - SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) Thereafter, on February 12, 1964, J. Lee Rankin wrote to Thomas Karramesines, Assistant DDP requesting both the identity of the individual depicted in the photograph and an explanation of the circumstances by which this photograph was obtained by the Central Intelligence Agency. 6127 (Letter of J. Lee Rankin, Feb. 12, 1964, JFK DOC. #3872) FOIA 543-233A On that same day, in a separate letter, Rankin wrote to DCI McCone regarding materials that the CIA had disseminated since November 22, 1963 to the Secret Service but not to the Warren Commission. Rankin requested copies of these materials which included three CIA cables. The that 102 3660 cables concerned the photograph subsequently shown in. fr by the FBI to Oswald's mother of the individual originally identatied by the ent to ation 123,. as' Lee Harvey Oswald f'(Letter of J. Lee Rankin" Feb. 12, 1964, JFK DOC. #3872) 541-235A Amrong the materiat's dIsseminated by the CIA to Chelsecret set Vas & November 26 dissemination. dK (CIA BoEnaT3177, 11/26/64) That cable concerned FOiA 76-7276164) Classification:. 000064 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 67 43 Classification: - during (This form is to be used for material extracted the DorticASmAmaScoRPalla a8aufreRß.$ and disclosed the CiA denitive popsetti that existence of GIA telephone surveintance operations information in Mexico-city at the time of the assassination andposwald's earlier visite's a result the CIA was reluctant to make the material disseminated to the Secret Service available to the Warren Commission for in so doing the Agency would have necessarily exposed its sensitive splation telephonic surseillance operationsto the Commission. John Scelso testified regarding the circumstances surrounding the eventual explanation given to the Commission recounting the origion of the photograph in question. Scelso stated: "We did not initially disclose to the Warren Commission all of our technical/fensin In other words, we did not initially disclose to them that we had Gauch operator s photosurveillance because the November photo we hady (of MMM) was not of Oswald. Therefore it did not mean anything, see?"{HS.CA: C/ass Depo of John" SeEtso, 51161787158 Mr. Goldsmith: ...So the Agency was making a unilateral decision that this was not relevant to the Warren commission bid/s Scelso: Right, we were not authorized, at first, to caveat a11 our tes nice opera 1028/18; sensitive) Rin: 1507 Ebid In summary the records shows that By February 12, 1964 the Warren Commission had (inadvertantly) requested access to telephonic surveillance proa ten, a cause for concern within the Agenty quietu Classification: - SECRET 000065 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 68 S ossitication (This form is to be used for material extracted this deam tortolted urseurtentsmaterial extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) 1044- due to the sensitivity of Agency sources and methods. Similarly, the possible disclosure/of the photo veilance operations to the Warren Commissionkhad also begun to cause concern within the Agency. oll. On March 5, 1967, Raymond Rocca wrote in an internal memorandum to Richard Helms that "we have a problem here for your determination." Rocca outlined Angleton's desire not to respond directly to Rankin's request of February 12 regarding the ClA material forwarded to tre secret servi since November 23, 1964.P0 -occa then stated: "Unless you feel otherwise, Jim would prefer to wait out the Commission on the matter covered by paragraph 2 (of the above-referenced February 12 letter to McCone requesting access to CIA reports provided 367 the Secret Service after November 22, 1963, ok AJFK DOC: 3902) . If they come back on this point he feels that you, or someone from here, should be prepared to go over to show that to them in copy: Commission the material rather than pass Incidentally, none of these items are of new substantive interest. We have either passed the material in substance to the Comnission in response to earlier levies or the items refer to aborted leads, for example, the famous, six photographs which are not of aswaldal ICTA DoC. *. FOIA #579-250, 3/5/64; see also HSCA Classified Deposition of tames Angleton, 10/5/78e PP. 31t:3 17 nation.- 000006 2000523 Hay deniention: C. Berk --- ## Page 69 Classification: Se Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted fridris Gibm contoolled deduntentsaterial extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) -44a- potato 127 wherein he states that the only reason for not providing the Warren Commission with access to CIA surverttance materials (tie e mush ent was due to the Agency's concern for protection of its sources and methods) 000067 Erassification: 20. 0521 Elassilied by derivations --- ## Page 70 Classification: SECTATI (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) On March 12, 1964, representatives of the Warren Commission and the CIA confered regarding the February 12 request for the materials forwarded ok to the Secret Service by the Ageney. (Letter of FOIA 6041-256017 J. Lee Rankin March 16, 1964, JFK DOC. # 3872, Slawson* Memorandum, March 12, 1964) The record indicates that the Commission at the March I2 meeting pressed for access to the §lesionis com. March 121194 Secret Service materials. Rankin wrote to Helms on March 16. that it was his understanding that the CIA would supply the Commission with a paraphrase of each report or communication pertaining to the Secret Service materials "with all indications of your confidential communications techniques and confidential sources deleted. VYou will also afford members of. our staff working in this area an opportunity to review the actual file so that they may give assurance hat the paraphrases are.complete.. (Letter of J. Tee FOIA 604-2564 Rankin, March 16, 1964, paragraph 2, JFK DOC. No. 3872) - Rankin further indicated that the same procedure was to be followed regarding any material in the possession of the CIA prior to November 22, 130 131 132 Classification: - 008068 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 71 Classification: - SECRET. (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) 1963 which had not as yet been furnished because 133 it concerned sensitive sources and methods. (Ibid., par. 3) Helms responded to Rankin's March 16 letter oli on March 24 (POIA 7 622-258) by two separate -134. F01H693-258 communications! (CIA Doc. DDP4-1554, hereinafter CD 631, Furt 6ä1-259 ola 3/24/64, CIA Doc., DDP4-1555, 3/24/64, CD 674 hereinafter) ) CD 631 provided the Commission with a copy of the textile. "October 10, 1963 CIA dissemination to FBI, State Dept.+ C00Bi INS and Navy Dept. (and to the Secret Service on 22 Nov.) regarding Lee Harvey Oswald and his presence at the Soviet Consulate in Mexico City. The response 3 I further revealed that on October 23, 1964, CIA had fyam the Navy. requested two copies of the most recent photograph of oswald in order to check the identity e of the person I-DI believed to be Oswald in Mexico City Furthermore, cank the CIA stated, though it did not indicate when, that it had determined that-the photograph shown to Marguerite oswald on rovember 2, 1903 sa pae seter to ree 26 Harvey OswaldT The Ágency explained that it had checked the photograp against the press photographs of Oswald generally available on November 23, 1963, CD 674 reveals that on Nov. 22, 1963 immediately follow Exilain is 0571 Classification: 000069 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 72 0.:. 47 Classification: - (This form is to be used for material extracted the assasstom Etonconfiled documenmper 23, 1963, three cabled reports were received at CIA headquarters from the CIA Maxico City Station regarding photographs of an unidentified man who had visited the Cuban and ED674 Soviet Embassies during October and November 1963. Paraphrases of tiese cables, not revealing sensitive sources and methods, were attached to CD(674. The Agency wrote that the subject of the photo referenced in these cables was not Oswald. It was further stated that: "In response to our meeting of z. March and your memo of 16 March,Stern and, Willens To t review or these 3 Service and the cables fied man." March 1964)4 (CIA DOC. DDP4-1555 €D63424 14° On March 26, William Coleman wrote in a memorandum for the record: 2 "The CIA directed a memorandum to J. Lee Rankin on-March 24: 1964 (Commission Document No. 631) in which it set forth the dissemination of the information on Lee Harvey Oswald. I realize that this memorandum is only a partial answer to our inquiry to the CIA dated March 16, 1964 and I hope that the complete answers will give us the additional information we requested." (Memorandum of William Coleman, March 24, 196AT% Coleman went on to state: "As you know, we are still trying to get an explanation of the photograph which the FBI showed marsuerite one en after the 21° Classification: 13 $9 FWH 141 Classified by derila 8:0 0 70 --- ## Page 73 No all. - 48: 55221 Classification: This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA controlled documents.) assassination. hope that paragraph of the memorandum of March 24, 1964 [CD 631) sent Mr. Rankin by the CIA is not the answer which the CIA intends 114 to give us as to this inquiry " (Ibid. Marit. 27 The following day, as agreed by Warren Commission and Agency representatives, Samuel Stern of the Commission visited CIA headquarters in Langley, Sterns' memorandum of his visit reveals -that he reviewed Oswald's file with Raymond Recca. Stern indicated that Oswald's file contained those materials oll furnished previously to the Warren Commission by, +5 Al "the file also contained: fron "Cable reports^of November 22 and-November 1903 23, from the CIA's Mexico City Station parton relating to the photograph of the unidenti- the Cohan. i? Octoberdo 6,60 fied individual mistakenty believed to-be 19÷1 Lee Harvey oswald'and the reports on these cables furnished on Novembar 25, 1992 0 02/92 "sharehone (Memorandum the segret service by the et the sa... of Santel stern, March 27, 1964) Stern noted that these messages were accurately paraphrased in the attachments to CD 674 provided the # Paragraph 4 of CD 631 stated that CIA soncludiettie Classified by derivar8.0 0 0 71 --- ## Page 74 - 49- Classitication: - _SEC 1417 (This form is to be used for materiat extracted warren Comfressian entreles cecuments 19647k He/also reviewed the october 18, 1963 cable from erA a field sti Mexico station to CIA headquarters reporting Oswald's contact with the Soviet Embassy Ilia in Mexico City.- In /addition, Stern examined the October 10, 1963 cable from CIA headquarters to the Mexico City Station reporting background infor- mation on Oswald." (Ibid.)) stern recorded / 4 9. that . these messages were Reprie Jok. paraphrased accurately as-set forth in the CIA's January 31 memo to the Warren Commission reporting Oswald's Mexico City trip Fbid 1150 Lastly, Stern noted that Rocca provided him for his review a computer printout of the references /51 to Oswald-related documents Located in the Agencys electronic data storage system. stated "there is i no itera listed on the printout which jehe Warren con. mission has not been given either in full text of. paraphrased." ( (Ibia.) 0157 Thus, by the 27th of March, a Warren Commission representative had been apprised of the circumstances surrounding the mysterious photograph. Classification: 000072 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 75 - 53 - Classification: - SECRET This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) Luisa Calderon Approximately five hours after President Kennedy's assassination a Cuban government employee in Mexico City, named "luisa" received a telephone call from an unidentified-man-speaking spanisia. -153 IN 697. ( CIA DOC. FOrA SEXT 7105, 11/27/63, 173-615, attachment) This call had been intercepted and zecorded by the CIA'sMexico City Station as the result of its 15% (Ibid. The Mexica City Station as subsequently reported to CIA headquarters, identified the Luisa of the conversa- tion as Luisa Calderon, who was then employed in the Commercial Attache's office at the Cuban Consu- late (Ibid=) SISS During the course of the conversation, the unidentified caller asked Luisa if she had heard (of the assassination) the latest news. Luisa replied in a joking tone: "Yes, of course, I knew almost before Kennedy." (Ibid.) 0/56 CIA'S Paraphrasing the telephone intercept transcript, it states that the caller told Luisa the person #Paraphrade on translator's interpretatio an Calderon's 5905% Classification: SECRET Classified by d000.073 --- ## Page 76 CIA HAS NO OG/E TONTO DECLASSPIOATICN ANDIOR RELEASE OF THS DOCUMENG 158 54 Classification: - (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) apprehended for Kennedy's slaying was the -15> "President of one of the Committees of the Fair alid Play for Cuba." Luisa replied that she also knew 159 Th: this Idisa inquired whether the person being held for the killing was a "gringo. The unidenti-160 fied caller replied, "yes! ""'. Idisa told her caller that she had learned nothing else about the assassina- 161 tion and that she had learned about the assassination I lore only a little while ago. The unidentified caller commented: We think that if it had been or had seemed... public or had been one of the segregationists or against intergration who had killed Kennedy, then there was, let's say, the possibility that a sort of civil war would arise in the United States: who knows that contradictions would be sharpened... 8162 Luisa responded: Imagine, one, two, three and now, that makes three. (She laughs.) (Ibid, D.27 Raymond Rocca, in response to a 1975 Rocke- feller Commission request for information on a possible Cuban conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy wrote regarding Calderon's comments: Classification: - Classified by derivaliD Dü7$ --- ## Page 77 Slassifisati8A: Secret (an i are ate, materia grated -55- Latin hyperbole? Boastful ex post facto suggestion of foreknowledge. This is the only item in the intercept coverage of the Cubans and Soviets after the assassina- tion that contains the suggestion of fore- knowlege of expectation. (CIA DOC. Memorandum of Raymond Rocca for DC/OPS, 5/23/75, p. 152* fsee p, 55a for t Standing by itself, Luisa Calderon's cryptic comments do not merit serious attention. Her words 164 may indeed indicate foreknowledge of the assassina- tion but may egually be interpreted without such a sinister implication. Nevertheless, the Committee has determined that Luisa Calderon's case should have merited serious attention in the months following the assassination. In connection with the assassination, Luisa " Calderon's nana first surfaced ca Movember 27, 195% in a cable sent by then Ambassador Mann to the State Fo.: 5'65 - /' Department (CIA DOC. DIR-85573, 11/27/63). In that cable Mann stated: .. Washington should urgently consider feasibility of requesting Mexican authorities to arrest for interrogation: Eusebio Azcue, Luisa Calderon and Alfredo Mirabal. The two men are Cuban national and Cuban consular officers. Luisa Calderon is a secretary in Cuban Consulate here." Ebid.) 11606 Classfication: - 2060525 Elasified by derivation. 003075 C. Berk --- ## Page 78 ClassificatigA: (This form is t8 Secret ysed for material extracted -55a- *Regarding the issue of whether Calderon's comments could reasonably be interpreted to indicate possible foreknowledge, the CIA position is as follows: During the Rockefeller Commission inquiry, Calderon's conversation was identified as a possible item of information from the Agency's Cuban and Soviet telephone intercepts that might suggest foreknowledge of a plot to assassinate the American Presi dent. This involves a faulty translation of an answer Calderon gave to her caller. In answer to the latter's question as to whether she had heard the latest news, Calderon said: "Si, claro, me entere casiantes que Kennedy." The verb entere is mistranslated. Me entere (the first person of the verb enterarsede, past tense) should be translated as found out (or I learned) /about it -- the assassination/ almost before Kennedy Ldid/." In other words, Calderon was saying she heard about the shooting of Kennedy almost at the time the event took place... (CIA DoC., Memorandum Regarding Luisa Calderon conversation, p.1). = 12 double spacer The Committee fundamentally disputes the narrow interpretation of Calderon's comments assigned by the Agency. It is the Committee's position that translation of Me Entere as either "I found out" or "I learned about" does not foreclose interpretation of Calderon's comments as a suggestion on her part of possible foreknowledge of President Kennedy's assassination. The interpretation, i nany event. shouldhavesn/eftto Hejudgement of theidarren iommission, not tre clA Classification: 000076 20.0526 Classified by derivation: - --- ## Page 79 CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATICR ANDIOR RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT Classification: - See Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted fr983 fAm fontrolled securpeptinaterial extracted from ClA-controlled s/gsuments.) This cable does not state the basis for arresting Calderon.* However, the CIA's copy of this cable bears a handwritten notation on its routing page. That notation states: "Info from Amb Mann for. Sec Rusk re: ...persons involved with Oswald in Cuban Embassy." Mann went on to state in urgent I terms: "They may, quickly be returned to Havana in order to eliminate any possibility that Mexican o government could use them as witnesses. According to CIA files, Calderon made reservations to return to Havana on Cubana Airlines on December 11, 1963, less than four weeks after the b assassination. (CIA Doc. CSCI-316/01783-65, 4/26/63) • Calderon, Azcue and Mirabal were not arrested nor detained for questioning by the Mexican federal 7870 police. However, Silvia Duran, a friend and associate of Calderon's and the one person believed to have the Committee's belief that Mann was prompted to request the arrest of Calderon on the basis of Gilberto Alvarado Ugarte's allegation that Calderon was present at the Cuban Embassy when Oswald was allegedly given a sum of money presumably to carry out the assassination of President Kennedy• fIA. ¿ June 1964, Attaehment C) / 8 Cassification: - tret 167 2000527 000077 C. Berk Sassed Dy assified derivation: derivation: --- ## Page 80 ElassificatisA: sgoget extracted -57- had repeated contact with Oswald while he was in Mexico City, was arrested and questioned by the Mexican police on two separate occasions. (CIA DoC. DIR 84950, 11/23/63, CIA DOC. DIR 85471222 13. 11/27/63) During her second interrogation, Duran was questioned regarding her association with Calderon. There is no indication in the reinterrogation report accounting for the questioning of Duran about Calderon. (CIA DOC. DDP40940, 2/21/64) The information regarding Duran's interrogation was passed to the Warren Commission on February 21, 1964, more than two months after Calderon had returned to Cuba. 17/ (Ibid.) Information was reported to the CIA during May 1964, from a Cuban defector, tying Luisa Calderon to the Cuban Intelligence apparatus. The defector, ANMUG-1, was himself a Cuban Intelligence Officer who supplied valuable and highly reliable information to the CIA regarding Cuban Intelligence operations. (CIA Doc., Memorandum of Joseph Langösch to Chief, Office of Security, 6/23/64) Calderon's 169 170 177 Elassification: secre 2060523 009078 derivation: C. Berk --- ## Page 81 ElassificatigA: - secret This form in is me me me men t -57a- 173 ties to Cuban intelligence were reported to the warden Commission on June 18, 1964 (CIA DoC. FOIA #739-319) 6/19/64) However, the Committee has determined from its review that the CIA did not provide Calderon's conversation of November 22 to the Warren Commission. Consequently, even though the Warren Commission was aware that SERPET Elassified By derivation: 000073 Classification: 2000523 --- ## Page 82 - 58 Classification: - SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) Calderon had connections to intelligence work, as did other Cuban Embassy officers, the vital link between her background and her comments was never established for the Warren Commission by the CIA. The Agency's oversight in this regard may have forclosed the Commission from actively pursuing a lead of great significance. Calderon's 201 file reveals) that she arrived in Mexico City from Havana on January 16, 1963, carrying Cuban Passport E/63/7. Her date of birth was believed to be 1940 (CIA Doc. Dispatch HMMA21612, no date given) Calderon's presence in Mexico City was first reported by the CIA on July 15, 1963 in a dispatch. . from the CIA's Miami field office to the CIA's Mexico City station and to the Chief of the CIA's Special Affairs Staff (for Cuban operations). (CIA Doc. Dispatch JECA-10095, 7/15/63) That dispatch had attached to it a report containing biographic data on personnel then assigned to the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City. At page three of the attached report Luisa Calderon was listed as Secretary of the Cuban Embassy's commercial office. The 000080 Classification: - Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 83 59 Classification: - SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA - controlled documents.) notation indicated that a report was pending on No such report is present Calderon. (Ibid., p. 3 of attachment) The in Calderon's 201 File. Agency has attempted, without success, to locate the report. Luisa Calderon's association with the Cuban DGI was first recorded by the CIA on May 5, 1964. (CIA DOC. 481 ina Memorandum of Harold Suenson FOIA 68÷290 5/5/64) At that time, Joseph Langosch, Chief of Counterintelligence for the Special Affairs 174 Staff, reported the results of his debriefing of the Cuban defector, AMMUG-1. The memorandum stated thạt AMMUG-1 had no direct knowledge of Lee Harvey Oswald or his activities but was able to provide 175 items of interest based upon the comments of certain Cuban Intelligence Service officers (Ibia.) specificaliy, IMMUG-1 was asked if Oswald was known to the Cuban intelligence services before November 23, 1953. AilNuG-1 told Langosch • "Prior to October 1963, Oswald visited the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City-on two or three occasions. Before, during and after these visits, Oswald was in contact with the Direccion Classification: - $3 000081 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 84 on rind NO ORJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION ANDOR RELEASE OF THIS DOCUIEME 60 - Classification: _ (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) General De Intelligencia (DGI), specifically with Luisa Calderon, Manuel Vega Perez, and Rogelio Rodriguez Lopez." (Ibia?) 176 Langosch thereafter wrote that Calderon's precise relationship to the DGI was not clear. As a comment to this statement he set forth the CIA cable and dispatch traffic which recorded her arrival in Mexico during January 1963 and departure for cuba within one month after the assassination. (Ibid.) On May 7, 1964, Langosch recorded additional information he had elicited from AMMUG-1 regarding Oswald's possible contact with the DGI. (CIA DOC FOIA 687-295, attach. 6, 5/1/64) § Paragraph 3 of this memorandum stated in part: "a. Luisa Calderon, since she returned to Cuba, has been paid a regular salary by the DGI even though she has not performed any services. Her home is in the Vedado section b. Calderon for several years. Before going to Mexico, she worked in the Ministry of Exterior Conmerce in the department which was known as the "Empresa Transimport." Her title was Secretary • General of the Communist Youth in the department named in the evIous sentence. (Ibid? 179 Classification: 178 000082 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 85 61 Classification: - SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) On May 8 Langosch further disclosed AMMUG'S knowledge of the Oswald casé. (Ibid, attach. 5) Langosch paraphrased AMMUG's knowledge of Calderon as follows: I thought that Luisa Calderon might have had contact with Oswald because I learned about 17 March 1964, shortly before I made a trip to Mexico, that she had been involved with an American in Mexico. The information to which I refer was told to me by a DGI case officer... I had commented to (him) that it seemed strange that luisa Calderon was receiving a salary from the DGI although she apparently did not do any work for the Service. (The case officer) told me that hers was a peculiar case and that he himself believed that she had been recruited in Mexico by the Central Intelligence Agency although Manuel Pineiro, the Head of the DGI, did not agree. As I recall, (the case officer) had investigated Luisa Calderon. This was because, during the time she was in Mexico, the DGI had intercepted a letter to her by an American who signed his name OWER (phonetic) or something similar. As you know, the pronunciation of Anglo-Saxon names is difficult in Spanish so I am not sure of how the name mentioned by Hernandez should be spelled. It could have been "Howard" or something different. As I understand the matter, the letter from the American was a love letter but indicated that there was a clandestine professional relationship between the writer and Luisa Calderon. I also understand from (the case officer) that after the interception of the letter she had been followed and seen in the company of an American. if / 81 Classification: 000083 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 86 62 Classitication: - SECREI (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) On May 11, Raymond Rocca wrote a memorandum to Director Richard Helms regarding the information swenson ad elicited from AMMUG ICIA DOC. FOIA 682-295. 5/11/64, Rocca Memorandum) Rocca proposed that "the DDP in person or via a designee, perferably the A-i former, discuss the AMMUG-I situation on a very restricted basis with Mr. Rankin at his earliest convenience either at the Agency or at the Commission -182 headquarters. Until this takes place, it is not desirable to put anything in writing. (Ibid. p. On May 15, 1964, Helms wrote Rankin regarding A-I'S AMMUG's information about the DGI, indicating its sensitivity and operational significance, (CIA DOC. FOIA 697-294, 5/15/64, Helms Memorandum) / Attached to Helms' connunication was a paraphrased accountings s of Langosch's May 5 memorandum. (Ibia.) that attachment the intelligence associations of Manuel Vega Perez and Rogelio Rodriguez Lopez were set forth. 183 However, that attachment made no reference whatsoever to Luisa Calderon. Howard Willens of the Warren Commission requested as a follow-up to the May 15 memorandum, Classification: 578. 3T 000084 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 87 • 63 Classification: SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) access to the questions used in Langosch's 186 all interrogation of AMUG. (CIA DOC. FOIA 739-316, 6/19/64, Memorandum) On June 18, 1964 Arthur Dooley of Roccals Counterintelligence Research and Analysis A.1 Group took the questions and AMMUG's responses to the Warren Commission's office's for Willen's review. Willens saw Langosch's May 5 memorandum. The only mention of Calderon was as follows: "The precise. relationship of Luisa Calderon to the DGI is not clear. She spent about six months in Mexico from 1817 which she returned to Cuba early in 1964." (Ibid However, Willens was not shown Langosch's memoranda of May 7 and May 8, 1964 which contained much more detailed information on Luisa Calderon, Al's report 96 including her possible association with Lee Harvey 188 Oswald and/or American intelligence (Ibia.) * The Warren Commission as of June 19, 1964, had little if no reason to pursue the Luisa Calderon lead. It had effectively been denied significant It should be noted that these memoranda of May 5, 7, 8, 11 and June 19 with attachments, are not referenced in the Calderon 201 file. (See CIA Computer printout of Calderon 201 file) Their existence was determined by the Committee's independ lassificationi: other agency files. SECRETI Classified by derivation: 000085 --- ## Page 88 64 Classification: - (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) background information. This denial may have impeded or prevented the Commission's pursuit of Calderon's potential relationship to oswald and the assassination of President Kennedy. But even if the Warren Commission had learned of Calderon's background and possible contact with Oswald it still had been denied the one significant piece of information that might have raised its interest in Calderon to a more serious level. The Warren Commission was never told about Calderon's conversation of November 22, 1964) Classification: Classified by derivatioD D 0 08 6 --- ## Page 89 - 65 - Classification: - SECREL This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) Seep66# the Calderon 201 file Dear: reference to the conversation nor does it indicate that it was ever made known to or provided the Warren Commission for its analysis. (CIA Compute print-out of Calderon 201 file) In an effort to determine the manner in which the treated the Calderon conversation this Committee posed the following questions to the CIA: 1. Was the Warren Commission or any Warren Commission staff member ever given access to the transeript of a telephone conversa- Lian dated November 22, 1963, between a female employee of the Cuban Embassy/ Consulate in Mexico City, identified as Luisa, and an unidentified male speak- ing from outside the Cuban Embassy/Con- sulate? If so, please indicate when this transcript was provided to the Warren Commission or its staff, which CIA official provided it, and which Warren Commission members or staff reviewed it. 2.. Was the Warren Commission or any member of the Warren Commission or any Warren Commission staff member ever informed Classification: SE ET 000087 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 90 ClassifisatisR: = from rom a conrolled - 65a - Secret documents. documents. orally or in writing of the substance of the above-referenced conversation of November 22, 1963? If so, please indicate when and in what form this information was provided, and which CIA official provided it. (HSCA request letter of August 28, 1978) The CIA responded by memorandum: "Although the (Mexico-fity Station considered the conversation of sufficient possible interest to send a copy to headquarters, the latter apparently did nothing with it, for there appears to be no record in the Oswald file of such action as may have been taken. A review of those Warren Commission documents containing information provided by the Agency and still bearing Secret or Top Secret classification does not reveal whether the conversation was given or shown to the commission. (CIA DOC. , Memorandum Regarding Luisa Calderon conversation, p. 1) The available evidence thus supports the conclusion that the Warren Commission was never given the information nor the opportunity by which it could evaluate Luisa Calderon's significance to the events surrounding President Kennedy's assassination. Had the Commission been expeditiously provided this evidence of her intelligence background, association with Silvia Duran, and her comments following the assassination, it may well have given more. serious investigative Classification: - -189 190 000088 Crustified by daciratin&n- --- ## Page 91 66 Classification: - consideration to her potential knowledge of Oswald (This form is to be used for material extracted and the Cub#em derantated dollenile involvement in a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy. Two difficult issues remain which are raised by the Committee's finding. First, why didn't the Agency provide the Calderon conversation to the Warren Connission; secondly, why didn't the Agency reveal to the Warren Commission its full knowledge of Calderon's intelligence background, her possible knowledge of Oswald and her possible connection to the CIA or some other American intelligence apparatus. The first question can be explained in benign terms. It is reasonably possible that by sheer oversight the conversation was filed away and not recovered or recollected until after the Warren Commission had completed its investigation and #eep 65, circled portion as tootnoremertini published its repori. (See above CIA explanation) As for the Agency's withholding of information concerning Calderon's intelligence background, the record reflects that the Commission was merely informed that Calderon may have been a member of -I P the DGI. CIA DOC. 5/5/64, Swenson Memorandu The memoranda which provided more extensive examina- tion of her intelligence background were not made Classification: . 000089 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 92 67 - Classification: SECRET, EJECTION TO CIAYA FICATION ANDOR DECiA RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) available for the Commission's review. Significantly, the May 8 memorandum written by Joseph Langosch following his debriefing of mltvo'1 indicated that AMMUG-1 and a second Cuban Intelligence officer 85192 believed Calderon to be a CIA operative. (CIA DOC FOIA 687-295, attach 5, 5/8/64) It is possible that this information was not provided the Warren Commission either because there was no basis in fact for the allegation or because the allegation was of substantive concern to the Agency. If the allegation were true, the consequences for the CIA would have been serious. It would have demonstrated possible that a CIA operative, well placed in the Cuban Embassy, may have possessed information prior to the assassina- tion regarding Oswald and/or his relationship to the Cuban Intelligence Service. and that Services possible involvement in a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy• Regarding Calderon's possible association with the CIA, Agency files reviewed reveal no ostensible connection between Calderon and the CIA. Classification:. 000090 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 93 Dok 68 - SECRET Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) However, there are indications that such contact between Calderon and the Agency was contemplated. A September 1, 1963 CIA dispatch from the Chief of the Special Affairs Staff to the CIA's Chief of Station in Mexico City states in part: ... Luisa Calderon has a sister residing in Reynosa, Texas, married to an American of Mexican descent. If (CIA asset) can further identify the sister, our domestic exploitation section might be in a posi- tion to follow up on this lead...Please levy the requirement on (CIA asset) at the next opportunity. (CIA Doc. 11935, 9/1/63) An earlier CIA dispatch from the CIA Chief of Station in Mexico City to the Chief of the CIA's Western Hemisphere Division records that: Wilfredo of the Cuban Consulate, Tampico, reported that Luisa Calderon has a sister residing in Reynosa, Texas... Luisa may go up to the border to visit her sister soon-- or her mother may make the trip--details not clear TCIA DOC. #IMMA 21849, July 3I, 1965) At the very least; the above dispatches evidenced an interest in the activities of Calderon and her family. Whether this interest took the form of a clandestine agent relationship is not revealed by Calderon's 201 file. SECRET $ 3 194 Classification:. 000091 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 94 - 69 - Classification: SECRET CLA HAS NO ORVE DECLASSIFICATION ANDIOR RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) The Conmittee has queried David Ronis, the author of the above cited dispatch requesting that Calderon's sister be contacted by the CIA's "domestic exploitation section." C¡HSCA Class. Staff Interview of David Ronis, 8/31/78) Ronis was a member of the CIA's Special Affairs Staff at the time he wrote the dispatch. He worked principally at CIA headquarters and was responsible for recruitment and handling of agents for collection of intelligence data. Mr. Ronis, when interviewed by this Committee, stated that part of his responsi- bility was to scour the Western Hemisphere division for operational leads related to the work of the Special Affairs staff. Ronis recalled that he normally would send requests to CIA field stations for information or leads on various persons. Often he would receive no response to these requests, which normally indicated that no follow-up had either been attempted or successfully conducted. It was Ronis' recollection that the above-cited domestic exploitation section was a task force within the Special Affairs Staff. He also stated that in 1963 the CIA's Domestic Contacts Division Classification: - 195 Classified by dllDi:Q.092. --- ## Page 95 - 70 Classification: — 5- (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) might have been requested to locate Luisa Calderon's sister. Ronis told the Committee that he had no recollection of recruiting any person associated with the Cuban Intelligence Service. He did recall that he had recruited women to perform tasks for the Agency. However, he did not recall ever recruiting any employees of the Cuban Embassy/Consulate in Mexico City. Finally, Mr. Ronis stated that he had no recollection that Luisa Calderon was associated : with the CIA. ( (Ibia.)) 19 Le Various present and former CIA representatives were queried whether Luisa Calderon had ever been associated with the CIA. The uniform answer was that no one recalled such an association. (Cites: Exec. Sess. Test. of Richard Heims, 8,9/78, p. 136; HSCA Class. Depo. of Raymond Rocca, 7/17/78, p. 148;, HSCA Staff Interview of Joseph Langosch, 8/21/78, Piecuto, Interview offaly 421 Thus, the Agency's file on Calderon and the testimony of former CIA employees have revealed no connection between Calderon and the CIA. Yet, as indicated earlier, this file is incomplete:the 197 Classification: 000093 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 96 :... 199 SECR SECRET Classification: (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) most glaring omission being the absencé from her 201 file.lof Calderon's cryptic remarks following the assassination of President Kennedy. Buckground.inm This Committee's investigation of Luisa Calderon has revealed that a defector from the Cuban Intelligence Services provided the CIA with signi- ficant information about Lee Harvey Oswald's contacts with the DGI in Mexico City. This defector was A+/ assigned the CIA cryptonym AMMUG-1 (A-1 heroinafter* CIA files reveal that A-l defected from the DGI on April 21, 1964 in When he defected, A-l possessed a number of DGI documents which were subsequently turned over to the CIA. C(CIA DOC." IN. 68894, 4/24/64) Following his defection, a CIA officer, Joseph H. Langosch, went, to to meet A-1, debrief him, and arrange for A-l's travel into the United States. 198 (Ibid. On May 1, 1964, 22 reels of Langosch's *It is now known that A-l did provide signati ant heren) leads to the CIA regarding Luisa Calderon PIE Gas classie itone at the dea to the infen commission. Therefore, the possibility exists that A-l had provided other information to tefassifiedby. rela to the Warren Commission's work der which wa ted che Issi 000091 --- ## Page 97 - 72- SECRET Classification: (This form is to be used. for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) debriefing of A-l were forwarded to the Chief off Disputer Station in (CIA DOC. Dispatch 7763, 5/1/647 Effective on May I, A-I was under contract with the CIA for operational purposes. (CIA Doc. Contract Approving Officer Meno, 8/6/64) By June 23, 1964, Langosch was convinced that A-1 would be of great value to the Agency. He stated: There is no question in my mind that A -1 AMMUG-I is a bona fide defector or that he has furnished us with accurate and valuable information concerning Cuban intelligence and agents can ratson Memons Joseph hang Director of security 6/23/64) As an officer of the DGI, A-1 from August of 1963 until his defection was assigned to the DGI's .20z Derrader da S < Illegal Section B (CIA DOC. IN 68894 4/24/64) which was responsible for training agents for assignment in Latin America. His specific responsi- bility pertained to handling of agent operations in El Salvador. CIA Doc. Personal Record Question- naire 6/4/64; CIA DOC. In 68894 4/24/64) A-1 identified for the CIA the Cuban Intelli gence officers assigned to Mexico City: Langosch described A-l's knowledge of GI operations in Mexico as follows: SECRET Classification: 000095 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 98 73 - Classification: - CIA HAS NO OBJECTION DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR RELEASE OF THIS DOCUMENT This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA- controlled documents.) In Mexico City, he knows who the intelligence people are. One is the Cuban Consul Alfredo Mirabal. He is called the Chief of the Centre. That is his title but he is actually the intelligence chief, or at least he was until the 16th of April at which time a replacement was sent to Mexico to take over. This fellow's name is Manuel Vega. The source says that the Commercial attache whose name is Ricardo Tapia or Concepcion the is not sure which is an intelligence officer) and another one is Rogelio. (: I might say that some of these names... are familiar to me. (Langosch debriefing of A-1, , 4/30/64, p. 5 of reel 4, 4/23/64) Thus, A-1 was able to provide the CIA soon after his defection with accurate information regarding DGI operations and DGI employees in Mexico City. # In sert from p72 The Committee has reviewed the CIA's files concerning A-l. This examination was undertaken € 204 to determine: 1) whether A-l had provided any valuable investigative leads to the CIA pertaining to the assassination of President Kennedy; and 2) whether, if such leads were provided, these leads and/or other significant information were made available to the Warren Commission. Classification: 003096 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 99 чата Classification: 74 -- SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) The Committee's initial review of the materials provided by the CIA to the Warren Commission did not disclose the existence of the AMMUG files. However, the Committee did during the course of its review examine a file containing material passed to the Rockefeller Commission. That file made reference to A-l. Included in this file was a memorandum of May 5, 1964 written by Joseph Langosch which concerned information A-l 205° provided about the Oswald case. ICIA DOC. FOIA 68-290) Liängosch Memorandum, 5/5/64) Also contained within this file were the A-1 debriefing memoranda of May 7, and May 8, 1964 previously cited with regard 206 to luisa Calderon.C (CIA DOC. FOIA #687-295, attach's and 5) Following review of the memoranda, the Committee requested access to all CIA files OI concerning referring to A-1. From review of these materials the Committee has determined that the Warren Commission did learn during mid-May 1964 that Lee Harvey Oswald probabl had come in contact with DGI officers in Mexico City. Classification: 000097 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 100 Classificion: sitt (This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA -controlled documents.) the warren Commission Prior to learning of Oswald's probable contact with DGI officers, James Angleton, Chief of the CIA's Counter Intelligence Staff passed an internal memorandum to Raymond Rocca, also of the Counter- intelligence Staff, which stated that he had been informed by the DDP, Richard Helms, that J. Lee Rankin had contacted John McCone to request that. the Director consent to an interview before the Warren Commission on May 14, 1964, (J. Edgar Hoover also appeared before the Commission on that date prior to McCone's appearance) Warren Commission Report,* f? 17129)(CIA Doc. FOIA 689-298, Menc James Angleton, 5/12/64 Angleton also wrote: I discussed with Mr. Helms the nature of the recent information which you are processing which originated with the sensitive Western Hemisphere source. I Informed him that in your view this would raise a number of new factors with the Commission, that it should not go to the Commission prior to the Director's appear- ance unless we have-first had some pre- liminary reaction or made sure that the Director is fully aware of the implica- tions since it could well serve as the basis for detailed questioning. The DDP stated that he would review this care- fully and made (sic) a decision as to 8 the question of timing. (Ibid.) 62077 Classification: - Classified by derived 0098 --- ## Page 101 Classification: SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted Und rint elay thelleshfuntise source referred to in Angleton's memo was A-1. This conclusion is based in part upon the date of this memo which was quite close in time to A-l's defection. In addition, Rocca's staff prepared prior to DCI McCone's appearance before the Warren a "Brief Commission for Fresentation to the Warren Commission outlining various positions adopted by the CIA vis a vis its investigative efforts and assistance to the Commission. CIA DOC. FOIA 695-302-A, 5/14/547)05 At Tab E of this brief it states: Within the past week, significant infor- mation has been developed by the CIA re- garding the relationship with Oswald of certain Cuban intelligence personnel in Mexico City and the reaction in Havana within the Cuban Intelligence Service to the news of the assassination of President Kennedy. The Commission Staff is in the course of being briefed on the a /0 Cuban asspect.? (Ibid., Tab E) On May 15, 1964, the day of McCone's interview,. the warren Commission received its first formal 66>1 communication regarding A-1.r -CIA DOC FOIA 697-294, 5/15/64) However, the Agency did not at that time identify A-l by his real name or cryptonym nor did the Agency indicate that the source of this information Classification: Classified by derivahol. 0 09.9 --- ## Page 102 77 Classification: - SERREL (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) was a defector then residing under secure conditions in the Washington, D.C. area. communication did (Ibid. The May 15 state that the Agency had established contact "with a well-placed invidivual who has been in close and prolonged contact with ranking officers of the Cuban Direccion General de Intelligencia." (Ibid.) 0z13 212 Attached to the May 15 communication was a copy of Langosch's above referenced memorandum of May 5, 1964 regarding knowledge of Oswald's pro- bable contact with the DGI in Mexico City. The attachment made no reference to the source's status as a defector from the DGI. ((Ibid., attachment) & As set forth in the section of this report. concerning Luisa Calderon, on June 18, 1964, Howard Willens of the Warren Commission reviewed Langosch's May 5 memo and the questions upon which the informa- tion set forth in the memo was elicited. Neither the questions nor the memo shown to willens made reference to the source's status as a defector col- laborating with the CIA. CIA DOC FOIA 739-319,5 0 6/19/64) - 215 Classification: stopat. 000100 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 103 Classification: (This form is to be used for extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) Based upon review of the Langosch memoranda, the Committee has determined that significant information regarding Luisa Calderon, specifically of Nov. 22 *details of her her conversation and association with Cuban Intelligence notforwarded were withald from the Warren Commission. This information as described above, was derived from However, debriefings of A-1. From the Committee's review of the A-1 file provided by the CIA, the Committee has not found any credible evidence indicating that other information provided by A-1 to the CIA was relevant to the work of the Warren Commission. However, in its review the Committee has determined that a as specific document referenced in the Al file is. not present in that file. The missing itemis of considerable concern to the Committee. It is a debriefing report of A-1 P. spaster No entitled "The Oswald Case." (CIA DOC Dispatch UPGW- 503503123/65) On March 23, 1965, a CIA dispatch records the transmittal of the report, along with ..17 eleven other A-1 debriefing reports^ "(Ibia.) Next to the listing of the "Oswald Case" debriefing report is the handwritten notation "SI." A CIA employee who has worked extensively with the Agency files 210 Classification: _ REL Classified by derivation 0 0 01 01 --- ## Page 104 - 552 "This f8rm is 18 be used for material extrasted 7889 ElA=e8ntfslied ascuments:) -80- system told a Committee staff member that this notation was the symbol for the CIA component known as Special Intelligence. Other CIA representatives believed the notation was a reference to the Counterintelligence component CI/SIG. IN a CIA memorandum dated September 27, 1978, the CIA has adopted the position that debriefing Report No. 40 is a duplication of the original Langosch memorandum of May 5, 1964 concerning AMMUG's knowledge of Lee Harvey Oswald's possible contact with the Df.l.* asth memorandit. officers regarding additional information that A-l may have supplied about Oswald. Joseph Langosch, when interviewed by the Committee, stated that he did not have contact with the Warren Commission and does not know what information derived from A-1's de- 218 briefings was supplied to the Warren Commission (HSCA Staff Interview of Joseph Langosch, 8/21/78; Cite also Interviews of Hildago & Piccato! He also stated that he does not recall that A-I provided any other information Classification: - 26. 0630 lassiffed By dericatio 000102 €. BerK --- ## Page 105 Elassification: - See This form is 18 be used to material exteenage F8m ElA Entralled assuments. -80a- *The CIA memorandum states in part as follows: When CI Staff learned of AMMUG-I's defection and considered the possibility that he might have some knowledge of the Oswald case, CI Staff submitted a list of questions to WH (Western Hemisphere) for debriefing AMMUG-1...WH desk records reflect that AMMUG-I was debriefed on 4 May 64 regarding this questionnaire.../B/ecause the debriefing on the Oswald case was handled as a sensitive matter, it was dictated directly to a CI (Counterintelligence) stenographer on 5 May 1964. Note: A-l was debriefed on several subjects on 4 May 64. The procedure was to assign each subject discussed a debriefing number and they were written up in contact report form by the WH case officer. The instructions from CI staff were to handle the Oswald case debriefing very closely and not to keep any copies in WH Division/. The "Oswald Case" was logged in the WH notebook log as debriefing report number 40, but the report itself was dictated by the WH Case Officer directly to a CI staff stenographer. There would be no reason to include the number 40 on the report of this special debriefing for CI staff, since it was their only debriefing report. We are certain it is the debriefing report (#40) because the date is the same; it is the only debriefing report on Oswald listed in AMMUG-l records; and it it (sic) the only AMMUG-1 debriefing report in Oswald's 201 file. Classifice (CIA DoC., Memorandum for the Record, Regarding MMUG=1 Debriefing Repost on tire oswal ace, 27_September September, beg, p. 1 9/2-718 CIaSSH1€a718A: - SECRET 000103 20. 003. Classified by deriyation: derivation: --- ## Page 106 Elassification: - segfet This form is to be used ter material extracted -81- on Oswald's contact with the DGI except for that set forth in the Memoranda of May 5, 7, and 8 as discussed herein. (Ibid.) 219 In a further effort to clarify the substance of information that A-l provided to the CIA regarding Oswald, the Committee has attempted to locate A-1. The CIA has also attempted to locate A-1, whose present/relationship with the Agency is ambiguous, but has been unable? ¿ste pil a for it) to determine his present whereabouts/* The CIA's inability to focáte a-1 has been a source of concern to this Committee, particularly in light of his long association with the Agency. remains, incomplete Thus, ta, nitriorot cirinformation A-1 Thus, may have supplied the CÍA about Oswald. However, with the exception of the Calderon episode and on the basis of the CIA's written reocrd, it appears that the CIA provided the Warren Commission with all A-1 information of investigative significance. A separate question remains, however. The Agency, as noted earlier, did not reveal to the Warren Commission that A-1 was present in the Classificatish: — 2060002 00010 Slasified by derivation: derivation: --- ## Page 107 Elassification: - "This form is 18 be used dar material extranted -81a- *An April 1978 CIA communication to the FBI regarding A-1 states in pertinent part: Since 1971 (A-1) has not been involved in any CIA operation in Miami or elsewhere. Joseph Norris is the alias of a CIA representative who periodically debriefs (A-l) on personalities and methods of the DOR A A 1216 20 228302 037 80 47 9/0/73 Vol. 4, A-1 However, a CIA handwritten index card concerning the Agency status of A-l states: Informed "Calvia" on 15 April 1977 that (A-]) is still an active contact, not receiving any salary, but could be paid if and when used in an operation. No problems here. active folder. (CIA SPOB will kegas contract in an Handwritten Note, 15 Abril 1977, contained in Vol. 4 of A-1 file. Classification: - 2000033 Elasilied by derivation: 000105 - C. Berk --- ## Page 108 82 Classification: - SERTET (This form is to be used for material extracted WashingtorronDClagrerplleph@cuuedet controlled conditions, accessible to the Commission. Giving due consideration to the CIA's serious concern for protecting its sources, the fact that A-l's status was not disclosed prevented the Warren Commission from exercising a possible option, i.e. to take the sworn testimony of A-l as it concerned Oswald and the Kennedy assassination. On this issue, as the written record tends to show, the Agency unilaterally rejected the possibility of exercising this option. In light of the establishment of A-l's bona fides, • • his proven reliability and his depth of knowledge of Cuban intelligence activities, this option might well have been considered by the Warren Commission. The AMASH Operation (to be ine gorated into criticism directed During 1967, the CIA's Inspector General issued a report which examined CIA supported assassination plots. Included in this report was discussion of the CIA-Mafia plots and an Classification: Classified by derivation: 000106 --- ## Page 109 - 83 - Classification: - SECRET, (This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA - controlled documents.) Agency project referred to as the AMLASH operation) (CIA Inspector General Report 1967 pp. 1-74, 78-112). The AMLASH operation involved a high level Cuban official (assigned the CIA cryptonym AMLASH/1) who, during 1962 while meeting with a CIA representative expressed the desire to assassinate Fidel Castro (Ibid., p. 84) , As a result of AMLASH's expressed objective and the CIA's desire to find a viable political alternative to the Castro regime, the Agency subsequently provided AMLASH with both moral and material 22% 22 support designed to depose Fidel Castro Ibid., pp. 80-94) The AMLASH operation was terminated Dy the CIA in 1965 as the result of security leaks. (Ibia. pp. 104-106) During 1965, AMLASH and his conspirators were brought to trial in Cuba for plotting against Castro. AMLASH was sentenced to death, but at Castro's request the sentence was reduced to twenty-five years imprisonment. (Ibid. pp. 107-110) In its examination of the AMLASH operation the 1967 IGR concluded that the CIA had offered both direct and indirect support for AMLASH's plotting (Ibía. 222 22$. Classification: 000107 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 110 229 84 - Classification: SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) The most striking example of the CIA's direct offer of support to AMLASH reported by the 1967 IGR states "it is likely that at the very moment President Kennedy was shot a CIA officer was meeting with a Cuban agent in Paris and giving him an assassination device for use against CASTRO." (Ibia 227 The 1967 IGR offered no firm evidence confirming or refuting Castro's knowledge of the AMLASH operation prior to the assassination of President Kennedy. The 1967 IGR did note that in 1965 when AMLASH was tried in Havan come press reports of Cuban knowledge Of AMLASH's association with the CIA weredated from November 1964, approximately one year after President Kennedy's assassination (Ioid. p. 1Il). The Church Committee in Book V of its Final Report examined the AMLASH operation in great detail. ((SSC, Book.V, pp. 2-7, 67-691 \ The Church Committee concluded: The AMLASH plot was more relevant to the warren Commision work than the early CIA assassination plots with the underworld. Unilke those earlier plots, the AMLASH Classification: - 000108 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 111 Classification: stepfat. (This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA controlled documents.) operation was in progress at the time of the assassination; unlike the earlier plots, the AMLASH operation could clearly be traced to the CIA; and unlike the earlier plots, the CIA had endorsed AMLASH's proposal for a coup, the first step to him being Castro's assassination, despite Castro's threat to retaliate for such plotting. No one directly involved in either investigation (i.e. the CIA and the FBI) was told of the AMLASH operation. No one investi- gated a connection between the AMLASH operation and President Kennedy's assassination. Although Oswald had been in contact with pro-Castro and anti- Castro groups for many months before the assassination, the CIA did not conduct a thorough investigation of questions of Cuban government or Cuban exile involvement in the assassination. (Ibid. p. 5) Classification: 000109 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 112 86 - Classification: - SECREI (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) In 1977, the CIA issued a second Inspector General's Report concerning the subject of CIA sponsored assassination plots. This Report, in large part, was intended as a rebuttal of the Church Committee's findings. The 1977 IGR states: The Report (of the Church Committee) assigns it (the AMLASH operation) characteristics that it did not have during the period preceding the assassina- tion of JFK in order to support the SSC view that it should have been reported to the Warren Commissioni (1977 IGR p. 2) The 1977 IGR concluded that prior to the assassination of President Kennedy, the AMLASH operation was not an assassination plot. Nevertheless, the 1977 IGR did state: It would have served to reinforce the of the matter of normal avenue of The CIA, too, could what most then saw in general térms-- the possibility of soviet or Cuban Involvement in the assassination because of the tensions of the time. It is not enough to be able to point 234 Classification: 000110 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 113 The Classification: - (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) to erroneous, criticisms made today. initiatives initiatige hour sale talen aroader CIA employees at the time felt-as they obviously did--that the activities about which they knew/had no relevance to the Warfen Commission inquiry does not take the place of a record of conscious review. (Ibid. p. 17) Richard Helms, as the highest level CIA employee in contact with the Warren Commission on a regular basis, testified to the Rockefeller Commission that he did not believe the AMLASH operation was relevant to the investigation of President Kennedy's death. (Rockefeller Commission, Testimony of Richard Helms, 4/24/75 pp. 389-391,392) In addition, Mr. Helms testified before this Committee that the AMLASH operation was not designed to be an assassination plot lExec. Sess. Test. of/ Richard Helms, 8/9/78, PP. 26-27). A contrasting view to the testimony of Mr. 233 Helms was offered by Joseph Langosch who in 1963 was the Chief of Counterintelligence for the CIA's Special~ Special Affairs Staff was the CIA component Affai Staff responsible for CIA operations directed against the Government of Cuba and the Cuban Intelligence Services (HSCA Class. Affidavit of Joseph Langosch, Classification: Classified by derivation 0 00111 --- ## Page 114 ElassifeatigA: — secret This form is 18 .234 Sept. 14, 1978, P. L) The Special Affairs Staff was headed by Desmond FitzGerald and was responsible for the AMLASH operation (SSC, Book V, pp. 3, 8, 79) Langosch, as the Chief of Counterintelligence for the Special Affairs Staff, was responsible for safeguarding SAS against penetration by foreign intelligence services, particularly the Cuban Intelligence Services (HSCA Classified Affidavit of Joseph Langosch, 9/14/78, p. 3). It was Langosch's recollection that: ... the AMLASH operation prior to the assassination of President Kennedy was characterized by the Special Affairs staff, Desmond Fitzgerald (sic) and other senior CIA officers as an assassination operation initiated and sponsored by the CIA. VIbid., P. 1209949023 Langosch further recollected that as of 1962 it was highly possible that the Cuban Intelligence Services were aware of AMLASH and his association with the CIA and that the information upon which he based his conclusion that the AMLASH operation was insecure was available to officials, including Desmond FitzGerald. Ibid., p. However, the issue before this Committee is Classification: = 2000631 Slaiied by deryation: - 000112 C. Berk --- ## Page 115 Erassitication: - seoret This form is to be ysed for material extracted -88a- *In response to Langosch's sworn statements, this Committee has received from the CIA an affidavit executed by Kent I. Pollock (CIA pseudonym) who "served as Executive Officer for Desmond FitzGerald during the entire period in which he was Chief of the Special Affairs Staft...and discusse& With him the AMLASH operation as it , Affidavit of Kent l. Pollock, 197p. 1) Mr. Pollock specifically contested Langosch's assertion that the AMLASH operation was characterized by the Special Affairs Staff, Desmond FitzGerald, and other senior level CIA officials as an assassination operation. In pertinent part, Pollock drew the following conclusions: To the best of my knowledge, Mr. FitzGerald considered the AMLASH operation to be a political action activity with the objective of organizing a group within Cuba to overthrow Castro and the Castro regime by means of a coup d'etat. I heard Mr. FitzGerald discuss the AMLASH operation frequently, and never heard him characterize it as an "assassiantion operation." Mr. FitzGerald stated within my hearing on several occasions his awareness that coup d'etat often involves loss of life. (Ibid., par. 3, p. 2) He also stated: Desmond FitzGerald did not characterize the AMLASH operation as an "assassigntion operation"; the case officer did not; I, as Executive Officer, never discussed any aspect of the AMIASH operation with Joseph H. Langosch; the Deputy Chief, the other branch chiefs and the special assistants could not have so characterized it since they did not know about the pen (the pen was specially fitted with a hypodermic syringe in response to urgings by AMLAsh for a means to start the coup by killing Castro.) The case officer offered the pen to AMLASH on the day of President Kennedy's death. AMLASH rejected the pen with disdain. /Ibid., par. 4, p. 2/), (Ibid., par. 6, p. 3) Classification: : 000113 2060635 Chasified ax derivation: - --- ## Page 116 Classification: — SEGRET not simply WhetHers th bentlast meterit on wed from ClA-controlled documents.* was an assassination plot prior to President Kennedy's death. The broader and more significant issue, as the 1977 IGR has identified it, is whether the AMLASH operation was of sufficient relevancy to have been reported to the Warren Commission. In the case of the AMLASH operation this determination is a most difficult matter to resolve. Reasonable men may differ in their characterization of the Agency's operational objectives. Based upon the presently available evidence it is the Comnittee's position that such informa- tion, if made available to the Warren Commission, might have stimulated the Commission's investiga- tive corcern for possible Cuban involvement or complicity in the assassination. As J. Lee Rankin commented before this Committee: ...when I read.."the Church Committee's report-it was an ideal situation for them to just pick out any way they wanted to tell the story and fit it in with the facts that had to be met and then either blame the rest of it on somebody else or not tell any more or polish it off. I don't think that Classification: SECRET 000114 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 117 - 90 Classification: - SECRET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) could have happened back in 1964. I think there would have been a much better chance of getting to the heart of it. It might have onLy revealed that we are involved in it and who approved it and all 238 that. But I think that would have-atleast come.out. (HSCA Class. Depo. of J. Lee Rankin, 8/17/78, p.91) The Committee is in agreement with Mr. Rankin that had the AMLASH operation been disclosed to the Warren Commission, the Commission might have been able to foreclose the speculation and conjecture that has surrounded the AMLASH operation during the past decade. As history now records, the AMLASH operation remains a footnote to the turbulent relations between Castro's Cuba and the United States. Clasificion: 338//T. 000115 Classified by derivation: --- ## Page 118 Classification: ET (This form is to be used for material extracted from ClA-controlled documents.) Cover Sheet The attached package of paper is the property of the House Select-Committee on Assassinations, and is on loon to CIA under an agreement whereby CIA is not to reproduce of copy the diaft or any portion thereof. and Notes may be taken on materials in this package, rough notes may be prepared as a basis for informal and oral exchanges with HSCA representatives. These notes, however; are to be held as though controlled and are to be destroyed under agreed conditions with HSCA. They are not to oe copied or excerpted and are to be heid until further instructions are received lor • eventual disposal. and papers have been numbered for accountability receipted accordingly. They are to be handled on an secure on a need-tot though constituting sensitive papers now basis. REPRODISTON 1N Copy 250F 42 Classification: Classified by derivation: ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10173-10155.pdf
104-10173-10155
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
10/13/1966
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
JMWAVE
PLANS FOR MAKING FILM PURPORTING TO SHOW EFFORTS OF HAITIANS TO OVERTHROW PRESIDENT FRANCOIS DUVALIOR.
3
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK64-9 : F2 : 1998.02.24.17:36:53:936102 :
3
## Page 1 104-10173-10155 REPORT COVER SHEET SECRET exPosT w). •nosect databan 1886 201-251853 PROCESSINA ACTION MADRED POR ANORRIS ORDELINS REQUIRED. ICS DISRENATION TOCH O/CHINATiON PALAP GO FINAND DISTRIDUTION - Jia. Port-aw-Priner 16: "8 1263o DO 16: 10 Man nege of: USCS Culton DYYOUR IMPALA PERUKER SOURCES ANDENIA-1, UnO SOl the laforsation la pare rapa l Soon Andrew STe GLORit: RID: Please cros ace to: 201-002705 (Andren ST. CORGID: 201-042669 (Rolando MASTERRER ROja»" RETURN TO CIA Baokground Use Only. Do Nọt Reproduce. one tie boredat Inclided fine no Declosificatie, 201-251853 1801 TE 1467: УдД --- ## Page 2 FIELD INFORMATION REPORT CASA O SOURC a como rotono donato computenci B04l0d s40e0st Balse 6 Cornos De andena, CONFIDEATIAL CONTROLLES DISSES NO FORCIGN: DISSEY REPORT NA. DATE OF REPORT • 12 0ot 66 NO PAGEE REFERENCES COUNTRY Haiti/Cuba SUBJECT Plars for jaking Fila Purporting To Show Efforts of Haitians To Ovorthrow President Francole Lavalior DATÊ OF 27. Saptenbor 1986 INFO. PLACE & Unatca statos Hian. DATE ARA: (5 COODON "95E) UFC 0588 SOURCES A prominent Cuban caigro, His reports concerning emigre affairs have been accurato. Fiere Conment. TDCSDB-325/02687-66, 22 Suptember 1966, ported" statements by folando lasferrer lojas, former Cuban: cenator, doscribing what he called plans for detton rainst laiti fron the Doninican Republie. According to other inton, peto no pied sa phe had enno prensi coreo a permission from Macferror to maxe a fiin for the Colundia Sroadcasting Systen concerning the activitios of the Mesferrer group with respoet to a7 Invasion of Haiti to be mounted fros the Doninican Republic® Soe also IDCSDD-315/02686-66, 22 Septenber 1966, which reported on plans for moving the schoonor. POOR RICHARD Floridas to Dinner Key Marina, Yitchel] Livingston Worbell III with the vessel. Herbola vassel caid that họ hađ beco •Systes (CBs) to produce & 90-minute docurentany fila an the e foras of the Haitian Catholie moverent to everthros the zovcrent of Prosidont Francois Duvalier of Uaiti® St. said that the filn mas to be radé in the Miani area CONFIDENTIAL CONTROLLED DISSEY NO FORZIGN DISSEY Enstante 5prs D.STR.@0T.5 --- ## Page 3 1d-0000 2.. • COHTIDEITIAL CONTROLLED DISCI GO FORCIG: DISSEM UrG -$503 assistant producer, with day richullen, cos executive as producer. According to st. Gorgo, all the necessary such as weipons, boats, motors, and ottur equip- meat. had Soca acguirod.. The schooner 200k RICHlaD and two small Loston whalers nould be usad in tho filu. St. George said that the only fiining cono 50 far has footage taken of a veadoo dance in a Miami bistro. St. George end his grown vere in dircet touch with Rolandp Masferror Rojas and two of his sadistanes. St. Gcorso has had nu:drous contacts with cusan enigne: croups, including. Representacion Cuban Reprosentation in Exilo), tha Asociacion facionalista Cuband LANC, Cuban: rationalist Association), and the new Cooriinacion de Fucrzas o* forces). in connoction with the filt. Field Comment 1.. for inforsation on the creation by RECE of Coordinacion de Fuerzas, see UFG-8589. With regard to Source's infor nation, above, that no haitians are involved, see UFG-8589, in which another sounce reports the involvement of Father Jean Baptiste Georges, prominent Haitian emigre Georges has been reported earther as working wite Masferrer® See, for example, IDCSDB-315/002?5-66, 80 January 1966; ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10121-10379.pdf
104-10121-10379
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
5/10/68
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CECIL TIGHE, OS/SRS
CI/R&A
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN GARRISON INVESTIGATION OF ASSASSINATION OF KENNEDY.
3
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK44 : F4 : 1997.11.02.10:59:55:106107 :
3
## Page 1 104-10121-10379 SEGlET ( 10 MAY 1958 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Cecil TIGHE OS/SRS 4E13 SUBJECT Request for Information 1. Request information on the following individuals who are involved in the Garrison Investigation of the Assassination of Prefident Kennedy: a. Jim BISHOP b.. Wayne COOK c. James Herbert MARTIN d. Bcujamin SONNENBERG Edgar B. STERN and wif 1. William WOOD .2.. Jim BISHOP a.. A Jim BISHOP was the author of a three-part. article on Jim Garrison which appeared in the Seattle, Washington Post-Intelligencer: b. RID/INDEX references to OS files: Janca Francia BISHOP, DOOB: 14 March 1937,, Chicago, Illinole (0S| - 192169): Jamon Howard BISHOP, DIOB: 3 January 1937, Gallowya, Ohio: Jaines Clarence BISHOP (OS# - 57262). Are any of these three identifiable with the newspaperman? 3. Wayne COOK a. Leslic Norman BRADLEY claimed that he flew from Wichita, Kansas to New Orleans on 23 November 1963 with a pilot named Wayne COOK. i In March 1968 COOK was attending pilot-training classes for Pan American Airways at Sin Mateo, California (FBI rcport) • b. RID/INDEX references to OS files: Wayne Birner COOK, DPOB: 22 August 1237, Iroeno, California (OSt - 235139) DIOU SCHIE --- ## Page 2 SECRET Wayne Augustus COOK, DPOB: 22 April 1932, Kingman, Arizonia (OS# - 389652) Is either of these men identifiable with the pilot.. 1. James Herbert MARTIN a. James Herbert MARTIN, a motel manager in Dalla:, Iexas became the "business manager" of Marina OSWALD after the assassination. MARTIN had lived in Dallas since 1956 (Warren Commission Report) b. RID/INDEX reference to OS files: James MARTIN, cit USA?, location: Los Angelea James H. MARTIN, 'CSC list 1-30-13, p-128 5. Benjamin SONNENBERG a. On the acknowledgment page of his book Rush to Judgenient Mark LANE states: "I am deeply indehted to Benjamin SONNENBERG, Jr. Whose numerous and invaluabio suggestions have found there way into this volume." b. RID traces indicate that a Benjamin SONNENBERG was President of the Public Relations Council in New York City in 1952 and later President of Publicity Consultants Incorporated. One FBI report indicates that in 1938 Alfred K. STERN guazanteed a bank loan made to SONNENBERG. 24 /6. Edgar B. STERN and wife a. According to Jack N. ROGERS, the committee counsel for the Joint Legislative Committee on Un-Amorican Activities of the Statc of Louisiana, Jim Garrison has been. recciving "contributions and monetary support" from Mis. Edgar B. STERN: b. RID tracus indicate that Mrs. Edgar B. STERN Sr. of New Orleans is a danghtor of Julius ROSENWALD. Thie would nake her à sister-in-law of Altred K. STERN. Edgar Bloom STERN Jr. is apparently a New Orleans TV station owner. SECRET --- ## Page 3 SECRET 24 7. William WOOD (aka William BOXLEY) • a. A Bill WOOD is alleged to have been conducting investigations in Dallas for Jim Garrison. He has used the alias Bill BOXLEY. Hc 1 possibly identical with William Clarence WOOD Ji. who allegedly had resigned from the Agency becauso of a "drinking problem" (DOS report, HOU-80-6B, 26 April 1968, out copy Indicated you receivod i copy) b. According to other information we have, a William WOOD of Waco, Texas was the Office of Personnel recruiter who covered the New Orleans area in 1963. Is there any connection? Sanes W. Dealer James W. Kesler CI/R&A 3 SECHET ---
2,018
/releases/2018
144-10001-10217_docid_6606966_binary_sealed.pdf
144-10001-10217
04/26/2018
Redact
NSA
5/8/81
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
Stanley Brand
OGC
JFK related…
23
NSA
JFK
2/8/18
23
## Page 1 Doe ID: 6606966 DATE: 12/10/97 PAGE: 1 JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY : NSA RECORD NUMBER : 144-10001-10217 RECORDS SERIES : AGENCY FILE NUMBER : DOCUMENT INFORMATION ORIGINATOR : NSA FROM OGC TO : STANLEY BRAND JFK RELATED MATERIAL AND DOCUMENTS RELEASED PREVIOUSLY TO THE COMMITTE PAGES : 25/08/81 SUBJECTS VARIOUS JFK LETTERS DOCUMENT TYPE : MEMORANDA, LETTERS CLASSIFICATION RESTRICTIONS : 1A- CURRENT STATUS DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/12/97 OPENING CRITERIA ORIGINATING AGENCY'S DETERMINATION REQUIRED COMMENTS : IR] - ITEM IS RESTRICTED Released on 11-01-2017 under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2017 Note) --- ## Page 2 LAO • Dóc ID: 6606966 NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755 Serial: GC/305/81 13 May 1981 Mr. Stanley Brand General Counsel Office of the Clerk House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. Brand: Pursuant to our conversation of ll May, enclosed please correspondence or records of communications between NSA and the House Select Committee on Assassinations. The documents were released as the result of an initial request and prior to our knowledge of congressional intent that this information be maintained in confidentiality. Future requests of this nature will be handled in accordance with expressed congressional intent; we would appreciate receiving, however, a letter addressed to this Agency specifying current congressional views with respect to the information maintained by NSA. If you have any questions do not hesitate to call me or Robin Ullman 688-6054. Sincerely, ratricia murphy PATRICIA A. MURPHY FOIA Appeals Coordinator Encl: a/s Released on 11-01-2017 under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2017 Note) 162-3-2 And Does. If --- ## Page 3 Doc ID: 6606966 Serial: N9187 CC: D/DIR ExReg (less encl.) GC D1 L22211 (less encl.) Stanley Brand, General Counsel, Clerk of the House of Representatives M/R: This response was coordinated with Q4 (Dinwoodie) on classification and with Stan Brand, General Counsel to the Clerk of the House of Representatives in determining whether correspondence originating with the House Select Committee on Assassinations are NSA records. Mr. Brand informed us of correspondence from Louis Stokes to Executive Agencies that congressional material and related information in a form connected to the Committee should not be disclosed without the written concurrence of the House of Representatives. A subsequent letter from the Clerk of the House affirmed this decision. He told us that he believes the Committee inadvertently neglected to send the Stokes letter to NSA. Copies of both letters are attached for your information, and, for LAO, your file. As Q4 had already released the NSA-originated records (not knowing about the Stokes request), we decided to uphold their findings. Future requests of this nature should be handled in accordance with the Stokes and Henshaw letters. If any documents covered by these letters are to be released they must first be coordinated with and approved by Stan Brand, General Counsel to the Clerk of the House of Representatives. His phone number is 225-7000. Mark Allen has sued CIA under the FOIA for withholding information responsive to a similar reguest. The D.C. Circuit in November 1980 remanded that case to the District Court, . but made some rulings on the (b) (1) and (b) (3) exemptions which we have tried alia, showing procedural conformity with E.O. 12065, demonstrating which exemptions the deleted information fall under and why, and releasing classification markings. PATRICIA Patricia Murphy MURPHY, OGC, 50475, May 81, pad ASCA-1-Bholson 3-7 Pennedy Coder If --- ## Page 4 Doc+D: 6606966,a. -2 +80-8 811-18-8110.81 a-.-. 1002.1657 MAD 8.111. 1. M.!He MDIRSD.PIIGIDT9 (702) 229-0620 Beleel Commiller on Signosinaliens U.S. House ol Sirportinialiurs SILS HOUSE UITICEHUILDING. ANNEXE W'ASHINGTON. D.G. 20315 March 26, 1979 The Honorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20530 Dear Mr. Attorney General: As you are aware, H. Res. 222, as passed by the House of Representatives on February 2, 1977, authorized the Select Committee on Assassinations to investigate the deaths of Dr. Martin Luther King, ur. ano The committee's work 1s now drawina to an eno. president John i write Kennedy. this letter to draw to your attention a matter that I recognize will inevitably come up in the future. A great deal of material has been generated by your Department in response to specific requests or concerns of the Select Committee. In addition, your Department is in physical custody of a variety of materials originating from the Select Committee. It can be anticipated that your Depart- ment will receive requests under the Freedom of Information Act for access to these materials. The purpose of this letter is to request specifically that this Congressional material and related information in a form connected to the Committee not be disclosed outside your Department without the written concurrence of the House of Representatives. Sincerely, LS: dm cc: Robert L. Keuch --- ## Page 5 "I'boat: 60d066 34 Crit an. Jongmand Colleg Toys 51rd Offire nf the Clerk 215 House of Braresculaties Jasjinglon, 2.0L 20515 March 2, 1981 Honorable William H. Webster Federal Bureau of Investigation J. Edgar Hoover Building washington, D.C. 20535 Dear MI. Webster: I am writing to you concerning a subject of considerable concern to me as the legislative branch officer charged with naintaining and pieserving non-current House docunents and records under the rules and precedents of the House of Representatives. Specifically, I call your attention to requests filed with the Bureau under the Freedom of Informa- Lion Act for correspondence, records or any communications between the Bureau and the former House Select Committee on Assassinations ('HSCA"). By letter dated March 26, 1979 to the Honorable Griffin Bell, former Chairman Stokes specifically identified the problem which would result from requests under the Freedom of Information Act for material generated by the Bureau in response to specific requests by HSCA during its investiga- tion. That letter requested that "this congressional material and related information in a form connected to the Committee not be disclosed outside your Department." for the House of SCA's records. General Counsel has generally. reviewed materials and has determined that none materials can be released consistent with the letter from Chairman Stokes asserting the exemption for Congress under 5 U.S. C. 5551(1) (4) (1976). This is our position notwith- standing the recent decision of a panel of the United States --- ## Page 6 Doc ID: 66d6866orable tll12am lebster rage L Court of Appeals in Holy Spirit Association For The Unifica- tion of World Christianity v. Central Intelligence Agency, 2202 (D.C. Cir. Dec. Nehe ring Trich, Let 2, to shee with sta 23, 1980), petition 10r We strongly believe that Chairman Stoke's reaffirmation by this letter, comes squarely within the standards articulated in the Holy Spirit case, request and any litigation which might arise therefrom, iwo factors cited by the panel in Holy Spirit as absent. As constitutional officer of the House chaiged with preservation of House records, I cannot overemphasize the importance of maintaining the strictest confidentiality over records generated by as well as copies of congressional materials retained by the Bureau, in connection with HSCA. While I believe that these letters adequately serve to support the withholding of any of these documents under FOlA, I would appreciate being informed of any such requests. this regard, please have appropriate personnel in the processing sections contact my General Counsel concein- ing equests for HSCA materials. Edmunda Menohaw.) EDMUND L. HENSHAW, JR., U.S. House of Representative --- ## Page 7 Doc ID: 6606966 NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MADE, MARYLAND 20735 Serial: N9187 11 May 1981 Mr. Mark Allen P.0. Box 9032 Washington, D.C. 20003 Dear Mr. Allen: This replies to your letter of 8 April 1981 in which you appeal the National Security Agency's (NSA) denial of information responsive to your Freedom of Information Act request. I have reviewed your initial request of 12 January 1981, the nine records located in response to that request, NSA's letter of 16 March 1981 which forwarded one record in its entirety and portions of eight other records, and your letter of appeal. As the result of this review, I am again sending you the releasable portions of eight documents and I am'referencing herein the laws that preclude disclosure of certain segments of these documents. I have also decided to release additional portions of three records that were released to you by the Chief, Office of Policy, and amended copies of those records are attached. However, I affirm the determination of the Chief, Office of Policy, that the remaining portions of the attached records must be withheld. The ninth document, an unclassified letter from Eugene Yeates to Robert Blakey dated 14 July 1978 was released to you in its entirety and therefore does not need to be addressed. Set forth below are descriptions of the eight records which were withheld in part and the reasons for withholding those portions of them. The reasons for withholding are as responsive as possible without disclosing classified information. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has recognized that information disclosed by an agency about withheld documents does not have to contain facts that if made public would compromise the secret nature of the information. App. D.C. 977 (1974). Document. No./ Description Attachment 1 Date 9 Dec 77 Attachment 2 7 Jul 78 Attachment 3 9 Aug 78 - Exemption (s) 5 U.S.C. 5552(b) (3): applicable statute Public Law 86-36, (50 U.S.C. $402 note) 5 U.S.C. 5552(b) (1); 5 U.S.C. 5552 (b) (3): applicable statute Public Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. $402 note) 5 U.S.C. 8552(b) (1): 5 U.S.C. 8552 (b) (3): applicable statutes Public Law 86-36, (50 U.S.C. §402 note) and 50 U.S.C. 8403(d) (3) 0r18 U.S.C. $798 --- ## Page 8 Doc ID: 6606966 Attachment 4 10 NOV 78 5 U.S. C. 5552(b)(1): 5 U.S.C. $552 (b) (3): applicable statutes Public Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. $402 note) and 50 U.S.C. 5403(d)(3) 01 18 U.S.C. $798; 5 U.S. C. 5552(0) (6) Attachment 5 21 Nov 78 5 U.S.C. C. 5552(b)(1); 5 U.S.C. S552 (b) (3): applicable statutes Public Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. 5402 note) and 50 U.S.C. 5403(8) (3) 01 18 U.S.C. $798; 5 U.S. C. 5552(b) (6) Attachment 6 21 NOV 78 Attachment 7 28 NOV 78 5 U.S.C. C. 5552(b)(1);5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (3): applicable statutes Public Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. $402 note) and 50 U.S.C. 5403(8) (3) 0118 U.S.C. $798; 5 U.S. C. 5552(0) (6) 5 U.S. C. 8552(5) (1); 5 U.S.C. 5552 (b) (3): applicable statutes Public Law 86-36, (50 U.S.C. §402 note) and 50 U.S.C. 8403(d) (3) 0r 18 U.S.C. $798 Attachment 8 28 Nov 78 5 U.S. C. 5552(b) (1); 5 U.S.C. $552 (b) (3): applicable statutes Public Law 86-36 (50 U.S.C. $402 note) and 50 U.S.C. 5403(d) (3) 01 18 U.S.C. $798: 5 U.S. C. 8552(0) (6) A more detailed explanation of the rationale for each exemption follows: With respect to the classifications assigned to the portions of documents 2 through 8 being withheld, I have concluded that they meet the criteria for classification in Section 1-3 of Executive Order 12065 and in paragraph 2-202 of DoD Regulation 5200.1-R and that the withheld portions are properly classified in their entirety within the categories provided in Section 1-1 of Executive Order 12065 and in Chapter I, Section 5 of DoD Regulation 5200.1-R. records have been reviewed for possible declassification or down- grading according to the provisions of sections 3-1 and 3-3 of Executive Order of Chapter III of DoD Regulation 5200. 1-R. Portions that were declassified are enclosed; the remaining portions were found to be properly classified and therefore excluded from declassification or downgrading despite the length of time which origin. In conducting this review, I have weighed the significant need for openness in government against security at this time. I have specifically taken into account Section 3-303 of Executive Order 12065 and have determined that the records, except for the portions released, should continue to be classified. Thus, I finc 2 --- ## Page 9 Doc ID: 6606966 that the Chief, Office of Policy, properly found these portions to be exempt from release pursuant to 5 U.S.C. $552(b) (1), and I affirm his denial of your request for release of these portions on those grounds. Portions of each of the eight documents are exempt fiom disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. $552(b) (3). Section 6 of Public Law 86-36 provides that no law shall be construed to require the disclosure of the organization, personnel, functions or activities of the National Security Agency. Each of the records contains information falling into this description. The National Security Agency is precluded by 18 U.S.C. $798 from providing information concerning classified communications intelligence activities except to those persons authorized to receive such information. 50 U.s.c. 8403(d) (3) protects infor- mation pertaining to intelligence Withheld portions of documents 3 through 8 contain information protected by these statutes. Enclosure 6 of DOD Directive 5400.7 (32 C.F.R. $286 (1980)) specifically recognizes 18 U.S.C. $798 and Public Law 86-36 as exemption 3 statutes. Thus, I also find that the Chief, Office of Policy, properly concluded that portions of the documents were exempt from release pursuant to 5 U.s.C. 5552 (b)(3), since each of the statutes and the directive cited above provides adequate grounds upon which to base such an exemption. In addition, portions of documents 4, 5, 6 and 8 relating to one individual exempt pursuant to 5 U.S. C. $552(b) (6) due to certain unique circumstances involved. I have determined that disclosure would constitute a "clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy," for this individual. With the exception of the one document released in its entirety and the portions of the other documents that were released, I found the matter covered by your request clearly within the statutory protection and exemptions cited above. proper protection classified information and intelligence sources and methods requires a denial of the remaining portions of the documents. Finally four documents originated by Congress, one of which was a Memorandum of Understanding between the House Select Committee on Assassinations and the Office of the Secretary of Defense and attached to document 5, were found not to be agency records and are therefore not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Possession of a document does not dictate that it is an "agency record" but rather whether control of the document has passed from Congress and become property of the agency within which it resides. See Goland v. CIA, 607 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927 (1980). As you already know, when the House Select Committee on Assassinations disbanded, Chairman Stokes informed former Attorney General Griffin Bell that the Congressional materials and related information connected to the Committee should be held in confidentiality. That assertion of Congressional privilege has been recently reaffirmed by the Congress. 3 --- ## Page 10 Doc ID: 6606966 As your appeal is denied in part, you are hereby advised of your rights under 5 U.s.C. 5552 to seek judicial review. You may seek an order from a United States Court in the district in which you reside, in which you have your principal place of business, or in which this Agency's records are situated (U.S. District Court, District of Maryland), or in the District of Columbia, for the production of any Agency records which you consider to have been improperly withheld by this Agency. 5 U.S.C. 5552(a) (4) (B) sets out your rights in this matter with respect to such judicial action. Sincerely, ANN CARACRISTraCisti Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Appeals Authority Encls: a/s --- ## Page 11 dc ID: 6606966 Legislative Affairs 9De 77 To: DIR THRO: D DIR He Assasinations Committe 1. The Diguty Clif Crunal Aà Assasinidins Chintee, Mr. 5. Wrey called to say he is sanding a litter to D1R. Letter, do be disfil Monday, will request cortain informatin (unziciel) 1 OSA. I Possidat Kenny o les. King. --- ## Page 12 2 Doc ID: 6606966 OAFT MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Phone Call from House 7 July 1978 Select Committee on Assassinations This office received a phone call this date from a staffer of the House Select Committee on Assassinations who said the address a letter to NSA. the letter would be on its way shortly. Legislative Affairs LAO CC : DIR D/DIR GC prodies 1376 --- ## Page 13 Doc ID: 6606966 NATIONAL SECUTITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SEPVICE FORT GIORC"". PiLADI. MARYLAND 20755 Serial: 1A0/025-78 9 August 1978. "SECRETi MEMORANDUM FOR THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY AND DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ATTN: Ms. Judith A. Miller SUBJECT: House Select Committee on Assassinations 10 July 1978 Request 1. NSA has made a thorough search of all records that might contain information relevant to the Select Committee on Assassinations' request for "telegrans or other communications, sent from Cobo Cleaners in Detroit, Michigan, by Earl Ruby any other individuals to Cuba in March and April 1962." 2. If no other component of DoD has located information pursuant to the Comnittee's request, propose you use the attached draft as your response to the Committee. If, however, there is any reason why the attached draft cannot be used, please consult with MI. Silver before releasing information in any other form. 3. The attached draft response is classified CONFIDENTIAL. A direct response from the National securitiency to the Committee's request because the availabilennon saint the type of information requested by the Commitee and protected in e Acting Chief Legislative Affairs Incl: a/s Copy Furnished: DOD General Counsel Faringi too 505. l0 1ild. 6ri 3 *HOLE VA SOME PHONE ENV 533169 47° --- ## Page 14 L822A5T bir. G. Robert Blakey Chief Counsel and Director Select Committee on Assassinations U. S. House of Representatives. 331 House Office Building, Annex 2 Washington, DC 20515 Dear MI. Blakey: This is in reply to your recent letter which reguested from the Department of Defense certain information relating to Cobo Cleaners and Mr. Earl Ruby in March and April 1962. The Department of Defense has conducted a thorough search of its records and e The above information is classified CONFIDENTIAL because it relates to Department of Defense intelligence operations and must not be disclosed to unauthorized individuals. In addition, you must not reveal the Department of Defense of any Defense Agency as the source of this information. Sincerely, F DRAFT John G. Kester The Special Assistant Candied by DIRNSAICHESS INSAICSIN IN A ERDOpe fiRE GDS, EO 11852, Calagary? Dectersiy Urn Molitiaiion Dy Sha Dristato INDENTIA HERAFT --- ## Page 15 Dóc ID: 6606966 CC : DIR D/DIR GC DDO EXEC/DDO Serial: 1A0-025-78 M/R: 1. MI. Blakey, Chief Counsel and Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, requested this information from NSA on 10 July. On 14 July, he was informed that, in accordance with the MoU between DoD and the Committee, requests must go to DOD not NSA. 'Ms. Judy Miller forwarded the Committee request to NSA. Lanes This memo has been coordinated with GC and EXEC/DDO. The classification was reviewed bysi sand approved by D/DIR. now =-. SKORET -MAHOLE VIA COMENT CLAMMIES OMIS 452 + 1944 --- ## Page 16 4 •* Doc ID: 6606966 710019057594 10 November 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: 8 November Meeting with MI. Blakey 1. On 8 November, *visited Mr. Robert G. Blakey, Chief Counsel and Staff Director for the House Select. Committee information linking an assassination plot against President Kennedy with a figure in organized crime. MI. Blakey had been referred to NSA (GC, Dan Silver) by Ms. Judy Miller, Special Assistant to John Kester, OSD. 2. Mr. Blakey indicated.that+ 3 had communicated with a friend of his named Sgt Michael B. Stevensen at "Corry" Field, FLorida 3. At that time, sometime before November mations 0949051 work w-37-753-7771 as wig referred in paragraph stated thàt he hia no did not know who the crime figure is. Super so Sater actually Prate 273) in his 4. Mr. Blakey stated that NSA had already acknowledged the existence of such a facility during this period, but he didn't indicate to whom such a statement had been made. 5. Mr. Blakey posed the following questions for NSA: (a) What is NSA's capability for retrieving communications from this time and place? (b) How quickly can we make this retrieval? (His Committee completes its work in December. If NSA can easily provide the answers to a number of questions, he will do some preliminary investigation before formally requesting the information, but if we indicate that much time will be required, he will task us now.) (c) What additional information does NSA need from Mr. Blakey to speed the retrieval process? (d) Is the data still available for retrieval? ow8+73976531 Ennistr b00 bosstaces 42. 78 --- ## Page 17 * Doc ID: 6606966 Ken Was& working for Praeter (Prater)i and actually doing this kind of work at that location during. that period? " He asked for the responses, or at least, a status of what can be provided and how soon, by Monday, 13 November. " September, the General Counsel sent a copy of meletter to the FBI (GC/335/78), along with a letter from AF Security Service (to which Sgt Stevensen had sent the letter). In the General Counsels letter he noted that sect service was 8. On 9 November, Band I met with Dan Silver and decided Dan should respond initially to Mr. Blakey's questions by phone. After coordinating with EXEC/DDO, Jasked to provide input for a response. 9. of the availability of data from & months 0F1963 conducted an initial review covering the first eleven • 0, equert fune eat YEATES EUGENE F. Chief Legislative Affairs * NOLE VIA SOIRA GUINNE --- ## Page 18 Doc ID: 6606966 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 21 November 1978 SUBJECT: House Assassination Committee Inguiry 1.: On 17 November 1978, m - GC, and I attended an interview conducted by staff members of the House Select Committee on Assassinations in regard to the allegations off concerning the involvement of certain: individuals in the assassination of President Kennedy. 2. The interview was conducted by Messrs Kenneth Klein and Gary Cornwell and was held in secure spaces prövided by Mr. George. Murphy, director of the Senate National security office. Both individuals are The interview was conducted under terms of a Memorandum of Understanding executed between the Committee and OSD on 15 November; 1978 (copy attached). 4. For purposes of the intervi DoD made available Sgt. Nicholas B. Stevenson SAFe was accompanied angerey raham, USAi Sgt. Stevenson USAF, ALI FOICE LegISLatIVe Liaison. 5.. The Committee staffers were interested primarily in Sgt. Stevenson's recollections in regard to events described by l in a letter to Stevenson written in May 1978. Sgt. Stevenson briefly described Regarding the specific allegations 3 relating to the President's assassination, mst. Stevenson emphatically stated that he had no no proba de us not been wilty on went ood it on man and my tole in the interview was concentrated largey on interpreting rong quemphasing the fact that the The staffers made no notes and agreed to let us review their report; for purposes of classification, on or after 20 November 1978. HANBLE MA COINT CHANNELS BY --- ## Page 19 Doc ID: 6606966 9. The staffers remain particularly interested in determining the name of the individual whom believes relates to the assassination. They will explore means of determining this all mation to include the possibility of having sgt. stevenson mand ask him for the identity (Stevenson indicate his extreme unwillingness to do this. LTC Graham stated that this request would have to be examined at policy level within DoD). If the Committee is able to determine a specific name, the staffers indicated that they would probably initiate a specific inquiry to NSA to again search our materials. UGENE I YEATE Chief Legislative Affairs Encl: a/s CC : DDO --- ## Page 20 • Doc iD: 6606966 CHIDEF NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755 Serial: D1/LAO-017M-78 21 November 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY AND DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ATTN: Ms. Judith A. Miller 1. The National Security Agency has made a thorough search of all records that might contain information pertaining to the Select Committee on Assassinations' request for information. to relevant to an allegation by * linking an assassi- nation plot against President Kennedy with a figure in organized crime. i suggest you use the attached draft as your response. If, however, there is any reason why the attached draft cannot be used, please consult with us before releasing the infor- mation in any other form. 3- The attached draft response is unclassified. EUGENE F. YEATES Chief Legislative Affairs Encl: a/s •=1 TIMESTO CHEAT DENIESACHESS INSANESSA LEGRO React $95e 605, 10 11052, Collins & Dustan lin asiaten by the Originate --- ## Page 21 see deeded totted Doc ID: 660696 Serial: 1190-04711-78 CC: • DIR D/DIR ADPL we 77075 GC EXEC, DDO M/R: On 8 November, Mr. Robert G. Blakey, Chief Counsel and Staff Director for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, posed a number of questions to NSA regarding at allegation that he te information linking an assassination plot against President Kennedy with a figure in organized crime. MI.. Blakey subsequently submitted a written request (dated 15 November) to support his verbal one. In essense, the questions probed sa's ability quickly an thereignly probe for records hm for information relating to the allegation. The actual traffic from this period was minimal and no other records are extant. The Director has approved. LAO, --- ## Page 22 Do B: 60666 legislati ive Aifairs 28 November 1978 TO: Judy Miller 1... Enclosed is a request made directly to us by Blakey and a reply which we propose be provided to Mr. Blakey by Mr. Kester. 2. If you have any questions concerning this please give me a call: EUGENE F. "YEATES' Encl: a/s --- ## Page 23 Dọc IĐ: 6606966 DRAFT AMSECRET HI. G. Robert Blakey Chief Counsel and Director Select Committee on Assassinations U.S. House of Representatives 3331 House Office Building, Annex 2 Washington, DC 20515 Dear MI. Blakey: This responds to your letter of November 13, 1978, directed to a component of the Department of Defense. with respect to the subject of the FBI file to which the requested information relates; Dinar sirens 420TOE DOn MA PN DA Sincerely, JOHN G. KESTER Special Assistant to The Secretary GRAF --- ## Page 24 Doc ID: 6606966 Putts ONEIDENTIAL CINE-CHANNELS MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 28 November 1978 SUBJECT: Visit to House Select Committee on Assassinations • On 21 November I visited House Select Committee on Assassinations spaces to review for classification purposes the report Messrs Cornwell and Klein wrote following the 17 November interview with Sgt Nicholas B. Stevenson, USAF. The report, about one and a half pages long, listed the participants in the interview and described generally the substance of the discussions: Although it did not mention the specific site to which Sgt Stevenson and assigned, it did say that the facility was able t u. The report further mentioned f and "NSA" in several places. 3 .. I told Mr. Cornwell that as written, portions of the report should be classified "CONFIDENTIAL, HANDLE VIA COMINT CHANNELS ONLY." He agreed to classify it and asked me to mark it which I did. I suggested that with a few changes we could make it unclassified. Mr. Cornwell stated that he would prefer to retain the original language of the report at this time but that if it was to be used in any unclassified report by the Committee, he would then ask us to review the wording so that classified information would not be disclosed. Mr. Cornwell asked if NSA had determined whether the conversation we ferenced had been published and disseminated in product channels. I told him that we had not yet determined the answer to that question and that we would be back in touch. Legislative Affairsi DISTRIBUYION DIR CAS D/DIR ADPL DDO Exec/DDO. ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10193-10062.pdf
104-10193-10062
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
12/1/60
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
JMASH
DIRECTOR
CABLE RE: PLS ADVISE IF FURTHER SMITH AMCHIRP-1
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-28 : F3B : 1998.04.07.20:09:24:390115 :
1
## Page 1 104-10193-10062 DROLLER WH/W/ PA Cil: 1935 DAlE: 1 DECIBER 1960 10 i MASH FROM. DIRECTOR 0.3 CLASSIFIED MESSAGE SECRBT fOUlING 3 INFO. • File MPP DEFERRED I DECED 22 07 7 ROUTINE PRIORITY OPERATIONAL RARMSOIATE CITE DU INO parall TINI LAL! GUT98159 14318 TO PRIORITY MASH JIN ET REP: MASH 1930 (DE 19510) PIS ADVISE IN FURTHER SMITH ANCHIRF-1 MJ0S SCENDULED OR HOW MATTER HAS LEFT. END OF MESSAGE WH COMET: Hamel Ray/Aschirpal atz 29 Morember OFFICERS ! o. DROLLER, C/IRL/PA AUTHINTICATINO OFFICEA SCRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMIBITED.. Copy Mo ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-10320-10235.pdf
124-10320-10235
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
8/10/64
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
100-409763-121
HQ
RO
9
FBI
HQ
3/12/18
INC LHM, RS
null
## Page 1 124-10320-10235 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 4/10/201 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER : 124-10320-10235 RECORD SERIES : AGENCY FILE NUMBER : HQ 100-409763-121 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: RO TO: HQ TITLE : DATE: 08/10/1964 'PAGES: 9 SUBJECTS: MARK LANE DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Secret RESTRICTIONS: 1B CURRENT STATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 09/24/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF CIA COMMENTS: INC LHM, RS 19.1 NH 50953 DocId: 32311918 Page 1 31 --- ## Page 2 Office Memor ndum UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. TO SUBJECT: Director, FBI (SC 100-409763) Legat, Rome (100-1072) (RUC) MARK LANE SM - C CONF DENTIAL DATE: 'SECRET 8/10/64 CIA HAS NO OBJBOTIC 75 DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR, RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION AN THIS DOCUMEN Kp218198 7Y 5668 s0l CLASSIT D DECI ReRomelet dated 7/21/64. By report dated 8/4/64 CIA this office a report concerning the subjeet italy clAmoseed emanated from an official Italian service but which was re-. letterhead memorandum. even tents o the par in set out a the dental manner Ore set out in the enclosed Cumentel the report was classified Confidential by CIA Yea 4. 76434. - 014/93 с GAT Classiffed (И) Declassify on: DADO JESSY Becal Tennay, era, hafinite FILI ENCI rile FBI discernsantin cAM do common, Confrontat Harpication a tened Classified by Exemptfrem iDS Date of Deciscon 5) - Bureau (Encs. SNCLOSURE (1 - Foreign Liaison) (2 - New York 100117844) 1 - Rome (100-1072) scM: hes PROX AUG 2'7 1964 CONFDENTIAL LECIZLEA to NtO 8/17/6.4. 2 6 AUG 311964 18/1/64. ail Eroyed 865 COPY RET EX 110 APPROP" AND TYS! ADVER R SITD(S) DATE 14 AUG 74-1964 ATE MENCIES OFFICES ECRE Sovie seatin SECRET NH 50953 DocId: 32311918 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 8/10/64 CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR. RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION SECREE Director, FBI (SC 100-409763) Legat, Rome (100-1072) (RUC) ALL IPOMaTION CONTAIRED MARK LANE FERSIN IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT SM - C LEUNG SZON OTEERWISE: IN THIS DOCUMENT.A JBH ReRomelet dated 7/21/64. By report dated 8/4/61 ClAy Rome, Italy furnished this office a report concerning the subject which CIA noted emanated from an otticial Italian sorvice but which was ro ceived by CIA, Rome, manner. (S) letterhead memorandum. The contents be the report are set out la the dEclosod The report was classified, Confidentias by CIA 10 re labskied Declassity on: OADR SAT ORK CLASSIFIED BY 5668 SLOGOL DECLASSIFY ON: 25X U — Bureau (Ence. 8) (1 - Foreign Liaison) (2 - New Yorks 100-117844) 1 - Rone (100-1072) JCM: hes (6) 8/18-ClT 8/20-CalT- Gui, There f clarane nat persing sona doss. WICH! 1N01N.00 SEG DIA NELS NH 50953 DocId: 32311918 Page 3 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10075-10167.pdf
104-10075-10167
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
11/23/1963
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
JMWAVE
JMWAVE CABLE RE IAPA CONFERENCE ACTIVITIES.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK17 : F3 : 1995.07.11.16:02:18:940028 :
1
## Page 1 104-10075-10167 SECRET : 218-138 C ACTION: C4/0 4 DOPS/L, DODS 4, CA 2, CA/PEG, CA/PROP, CI/OPS, Ci/IC 2, El, Fi/LUT 2, WHi?, SEGRET 2222322 PACY INFO DIR MEXI CITE WAVE S047 DISORIC IPPANSACK PERUMEN REPS: A. PACY 1354(11 65904) : C/ I'S COMET: MAPPRECIATE KNOWING WHAT HAVE ASSETS ATTENDING SEMINAR. 06 VAVE 7900 (IN GSIGN) DELAYED BY TAPA CONPINNCE ACHINGLES, DEPARTED BY AIR CO NOVO DIAZ VERDON DEPARTIO 13 LOVO BOTH HAVE FULL EXPENSES PAID BY FIOPP. 06 2. SUGGEST HANDLING OPS CONTACTS THROUGH WHO HAS POA AND IS FULLY RESFONSIVE WAVE. L'SE "FRIEND OF FICARDO IN MIAMI" AS SONA FIDES. DiAZ VERSON IS PROFESSICAL ANT: - CONUNIS: AND ONE TIME POLICE CHIEF. UNDER BATISTA ENO IN TOUCH CITY WAVE THROUGH 06 CUTOUT, EUT WILL COOPERATE WITHI ..: MI7 URIGITALLY PRESS SECTION DEN, GAVE-SUBSIOILED TEACHERS GROUP, BUD GRADUALLY BECAME WAVE OUTLET FOR ACCROSS-BOARD PROP -PLACEMENT. FIOPP OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT AT APR 6E NESTING OF VALUE FOR PASTICE PURPOSE. PIS ATTENPT AVOIO DISCUSSION THIS MATTER AT SSMINAR: FYI AIP OPENLY ANTI-COMMUNIST BUT OTHERWISE SCRUPULOUSLY ATTEYPTS AVOID POLITICS. 5. NO INDEXING. 10969 SEERS: 5215a5 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10059-10121.pdf
104-10059-10121
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
1/10/78
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DDO/ISS/IP/EIS
CHIEF, NE/ISRAEL
MEMO RE MITCHELL LIVINGSTON WERBELL III.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK8 : F9 : 20031208-1021128 :
1
## Page 1 104-10059-10121 SECRET/SENSITIVE 10 January 1978 MEMORANDUM FOR: DDO/ISS/IR/RIS FROM .......-.. Chief, NE larsel •. a..-.. SUBJECT: Mitchell livingston WerBell TIT REFERENCE OLC. 77- 5685/4, Request from House Select Committee on Assassinations On 9 January 1978, the files of NE/Israel Branch were searched for records referring to the In individuals cited In reference zequest... All traces were negative, with, the exception.of Mitchell Livingston WerBell IU 2. Attached for your information. are copies of two NE/ISR index cards and two NE/ISR records concerning WerBell. The State Department cable dated 12 November 1971) could not be found in NBASR files. A copy. of the second reference, a sensitive Fil report dated 29 January 1970 (Project SCOPE), is attached for, your information. Please contact the Bureau for rolease of this report. Also attached 1s a copy 01.a l Decomber 120 article fron the Washington Post which concerns HerBell. If further Information. contact Alyson ward 81004. N6/SSR. •regen Attachments: A. Index cards B. Records SECRET/SENSITIVE EZ TMPDBT CL BY 018559 03968 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10048-10098.pdf
104-10048-10098
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
2/2/65
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
ALLEGED ABORTIVE AIR RAID OVER CUBA BY THE MOVIMIENTO INSURRECCIONAL DE RECUPERACION REVOLUCIONARIA MIRR
3
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK2 : F15 : 1993.06.30.09:31:56:960510 :
3
## Page 1 104-10048-10098 INFIX:: L NO CLASSIFY TO FILE NO FROM MANENO FILE RID RET. TO BRANCH O ACTIONY 5I3. JW SEAGRE.T = Cy Helen INFO: DDP, 'ADI *, SOD 4, CA 2, CA/PEG, CA/PROP, CA/O 4, CI, CI/OPS, CI/PS, CI/IC 2, FI, FI/D, FIFINT 6, RI/AN, WH 8, JH/SA/12, VR, FILE. INDEXED AND CONTROL COPIES NOT WATCHED NR SUE:CRET 0323147 H2P 4 FEB 65 11DZ IN 73172 DIR INFO LANT PACY BARR CITE WAVE T9QD SINGHURST ACTING FRAG INTEL TYPIC I DISCRET SUPDATA: ABSTRACT _INDEX ABOUT MIDNIGHT 3 AMCLATTER 1 BY) PHONE FROM Y 2 FEB. RID: INDEX. FILED: 03/2314Z REPORT CLASS CONFIDENTIAL CONTROLLED DISSEM COUNTRY: CUBA SUBJ: ALLEGED ABORTIVE AIR. RAID OVER CUBA BY THE MIRR DOI: 2 FEB 65 PADA: UNITED STATES, MIAMI (3 FEB 65) MICROFILMED EEB 121965 UFG 6636 DOC. MICRO. SER P SOURCE: A MIAMI BUSINESSMAN WHO WAS A RESIDENT OF HABANA FOR SEVERAL YEARS. THE SOURCE HAS CONTACTS WHO RECOGNIZE HIM AS A CHANNEL TO U.S. INTELLIGENCE. THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A FRIEND OF BILL JOHNSON IW COMMENT: R WH/SA 122 2R29 8 TDCSD9-315/00379-65 C P Y R C P R C P X/ ROUTINE BASED ON: RELEASING I WO GLENN W. NELSON DATE DISTRIBUTED: 3 FEBRUARY 1965 0323Z SECRET LIAISON: EXCLUDED AUTOMATIC 00487 796868942809 MAMA 104184 REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN IS SING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED, ¡PRIORITY P UFG-6636 NP: AMCLATTER-1 201-25/684 45icl16165 Copy No. $39141 7. 0 02236 --- ## Page 2 13-00000 CONFIDENTIAL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE ACENCY Intelligence Information Cable COUNTRY DATE OF INFO. CUBA 2 FEBRUARY 1965 ONTROLLED DISSEM • ROUTINE TDCSDB-315/00379-65 DISTR.3 FEBRUARY 1965 - SUBJECT - INFORE ALLEGED ABORTIVE AIR RAID OVER CUBA BY THE MOV IMIENTO INSURRECCIONAL DE RECUPERACION REVOLUCIONARIA& (MIRR UNITED STATES, MIAMI: (3 FEBRUARY 1965) PLACE & DATE ACQ. SOURCE AND APPRAISAL: REF IN 73172 FIELD REPORT NO. UFG-6636 A MIAMI BUSINESSMAN WHO WAS A RESIDENT OF. HABANA FOR SEVERAL YEARS. THE: SOURCE HAS CONTACTS WHO RECOGNISE HIM AS A CHANNEL TO U.S. INTELLIGENCE. THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A FRIEND OF BILL JOHNSON® Cir USA Miami, FialisA. - 1. ON 2 FEB 65, BILK JOHNSON, AN AMERICAN PILOT WHQ ARRANGES SUPPORT ASPECTS OF AIR STRIKES AGAINST CUBA BY ORLANDO BOSCH AVILA'S cit Cuba MOVIMIENTO INSURRECCIONAL DE RECUPERACION REVOLUCIONARIA (MIRR, * INSURRECTIONAL MOVEMENT FOR REVOLUTIONARY RECOVERY) , SAID THAT JACK BROOKS GUAIGHT WAS ON FRE FIRST LEG ANAUST EVER CUBA WHEN HIS TWIN-ENGINE BEECHCRAFT CRASHED WHILE HE WAS ATTEMPTING TO LAND AT FREEPORT, GRAND BAHAMAS ISLAND, ON 2 FEB. JOHNSON SAID THAT A BOAT WITH AMMUNITION AND SUPPLIES WAS WAITING FOR THE PLANE TO ARRIVE AT FREEPORT. THIS CARGO WAS THEN TO BE TRANSFEPRED TO THE BEECH CRAFT. JOHNSON ADDED THAT HE WAS ASKING BOSCH FOR $2, DEÓ TO GIVE TO This masterial contains Information alectiaz the Intlonal Defense of the United States withla the neaning of the Esplonage Inws. Title 18, U.S.C. Beca. 793 and 79%, the transmalision a revelation Of Which in any manny 10 sit unal buried person is prohibited by law. CONFIDENTIAL •LONTROLLED DISSEM STATE/INR: DIA ARHY/ACSI NAVY AIR. JCS SECDEF NSA NIC AID USIA OCI ONE OCR ORR 00 :C/CL 2, CIA/NMCC, FBI, IENS; TREASURY, BORDER PATROL, COASE GUARD, CUSTOMS --- ## Page 3 13-00000 CONFIDENTIAL ( TDCSDB-315/00379- PAGE 2 -65 MRS. WRIGHT TO "KEEP HER QUIET." .2. JOHNSON ALSO SAID THAT WRIGHT HAD FLOWN THE SAME BEECHCRAFT OVER CUBA ON 17 JAN WHEN THE MIRR BOMBED THE NIAGARA SUGAR MILL IN PINAR DEL RIO PROVINCE. (FIELD COMMENT: ANOTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY REPORTED THAT WRIGHT DEPARTED AT 12:30 P.M. ON 16 JAN IN A BEECHCRAFT BEARING REGISTRATION N 52933 FROM FORT LAUDERDALE FOR FREEPORT. HE LEFT FREEPORT AT 5:17 P.M. AND CHECKED THROUGH FORT LAUDERDALE CUSTOMS AT 6:20 P.M. THAT DAY. THERE IS NO INFORMATION TO INDICATE THAT THE N 52933, THE SAME AIRCRAFT THAT CRASHED ON 2 FEB, WAS FLOWN ON 17 JAN.) 3. (FIELD COMMENT: THE 3 FEB ISSUE OF THE MIAMI HERALD REPORTED THAT THE FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY IDENTIFIED THE DEAD PILOT WHO CRASHED AT FREEPORT AIRPORT ON THE AFTERNOON OF 2 FEB AS JACK BROOKS WRIGHT OF 6208 NE 5TH AVE, MIAMI. WRIGHT TOOK OFF FROM FORT LAUDERDALE - HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AT 11:48 A.M. IN THE TWIN-ENGINE BEECHCRAFT, WHICH WAS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN RENTED TO A UNIFORM SUPPLY FIRM. THE FAA SAID THAT WRIGHT WAS LISTED AS THE OWNER OF THE PLANE.) 4. FIELD DISSEM: CINCLANT, CINGSO, COMKWESTFOR, MIAMI REPS MOF STATE, USCG, BORDER PATROL, I&NS, FBI AND CUSTOMS. CONFIDENTIAL (END OF MESSAGE) CHITROLLED DISSEM D082236 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10431-10075.pdf
104-10431-10075
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
12/11/63
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
RUSS HOLMES WORK FILE
CHIEF, SINO-SOVIET BLOC AREA
SRI-HUNTLEY NEIL
MF: ADDITIONAL NOTES AND COMMENTS ON THE OSWALD CASE-SUMMARY OF REASONS FOR NOT CONCLUDING SOVIET INVOLVEMENT WITH OSWALD
8
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK-RH18 : F05 : 1998.12.16.09:38:03:076128 : PAGE 7 IS BLANK
8
## Page 1 104-10431-10075 V SAM NO TONSON DISEM 35901 FEE: ni;- "Il Deceaber 195t6 Pira 150, 020) SPITHLES B2:8: 7.70964 1ASTA5 11148.9 (CEL :2. 13.3.60 CABLE KEN (11) NED (3). LECH FELTE CLASSIFICATION REVIEW CONDUCTED ON R5- MAY 1921 mIMPDET CL BY 0142€ for FOLA Review on MAY 1976 HENORANDUM FOR: Chief, Bino-Soviet Bloc Area TEROUGH : Chief, Soviet Internal Affairs Branch Chief, Soviet Division FROM SRI - Neil Hintley SUBJECT Additional Notes and Conments on the Oswald Case - Summany cr Rousers for not ceveluding Stret eNvelremont with OscArn According to the New York Iimes for 10 December, the Fil report on the assassination of Fresident Kennedy categorically states that loe tarvey Oswald was the assassin, that he acted alone, and that there is no ev dence to indicate that he was the agent of any foreign government. These disclosures prosumably elisinate the possibility of furtber conirontations, with kre Robert Slusser• In the event that tr. Slusser continues to Inalst that the President was nurdered by the Sovlet se cret police, the following additional negative indications and observations may be of sone value. Long standing kis practice generally forbids serving outside the USSR to have any contact with domestic communist parties or with sovlet embassies or consulates. 2055 This prohibition, designed to reduce the possibilitles of compronise to a minimm, is probably nost stringently applied to agents on extremely sensitive i sions. Jet Oswald blazed a trail to the Soviets which was a mile wide. He corresponded with the nationnl headquarters of the Cornist Party USA- apparently With sone regular- Ity-and visited the Soviet Consulate In Mexico City. In addition to his well-knom leftist political activitles, 11 DEC63 RFCORD COPY SEGRET BACKGRO S USE ONLY 201-289248 endor 1 Excluded ian autoratic donateling ant dechoosit caren tired --- ## Page 2 13-00000 4" " ho also subscribed to the Dally Vorker and a Trotskyite pubilcation, allegedly received newspapers fron the Sov let Unlon, and asked last June that his passport be re validated for travel to the USSR. Certain facets of Oswald's activities in the Boss also sigue strongly thit the IGB sould never have recrulted him for a mission of any kind. First, there Is no doubt that Oswald us debriefed by the secret police shortly after his arrival In Hoscow. They were interested In him not only because he was a political defector, but also because be boasted publicly in the Embassy on 31 October 1959- that he Intended to tell the Soviets "everything he knew" about Marine Corps radar Installations on the West Coast. / According to Oswald's former conmanding officer, this included the locations of all radar unts and their secret call signs, authentication codes and radio frequencies-all of which knowledge was grist for the Sovlet Intelligence u1ll. Given the KGB penchant for keeping Its "Illegals" under the deepest possible cover, bovever, 1t 18 extremely unlikely that oswald with bis Fassian wife was even seriously considered for subsequent repatriation to the United States as # KGB asset. As a re-defector from the USSR he would immediatoly be suspect and thus under survelllance by the ible Furthernore, any Indication that he had made good on his bonst about the radars could easily lead to arrest and Indictent on a charge o1 treason. Secondly, Sovlet "executive action" agents (assassins, saboteurs and terrorists) are carefully selected by the KGB and specifically trained for their missions. Oswald very probably ruled hluself out of any consideration. for this kind of operation. On 14 November 1959, Moscow refused his request for sor fet citizenship; Shortly thereafter, he becane des pondent and reportedly attempted to kill hinsolf by slashing his wrists. Even 1f the EG3 bad not earlier noted signs of mental aberratlons, the sulcide try pre sumably furnished convincing evidence that Oswald vas 5. Oswald's activities on a Dallas rifle rango on 17 November are of some interest both as circumstantial evidence of prior planning to assassinate the President and as one more negatlve indication of XGB Involvement. BACKGNON. NO Fo. USE ONLY --- ## Page 3 13-00000 SLutci NO FOREC. SSEM Oswald was firing at a range of 100 yards. He was assigned to target suber 8, but according to witnesses, was actu aLy Iring at targets 7, 8, and 9.: Se was thus firing through an nre of approximately lo degrees and obviously seems to have been simulating Iise at a moving target. It 15, of course, most unllkely that & KGb agent on an pat kins is a ge perait hinself) to practice firing under such obvious and public circunstances. :Go.: The evidence presently avallable to us seens falrly conclusively to rule out any soviet Involvement in the President's assassination. There are, however, several rather fascinating inconsistencies, loose ende and unanswered questions about Oswald. Some, #I not ally may be treated in the IBI report. Pending its publion ton, they are listed below for whatever they may be worth. 2): In an interview last august, Oswald stated that his father-In-law was a sovlet army colonel who taught him to drink vodsa when he came to court Marad. After the assassination, however, Nrs. Ruth Paine (some- time Oswald Irlend and landlady) stated thnt Marina's father, a colonel, had died wben Marina was an Infant. b) To the tine of some $437, the US pleked up the tab for Ossald's return to this country. loan was repald between October 1962 and January 1963. During this period, Oswald was earning $50 per veel, Thus, over half of his total earnings went to the govern ment and he supported himself, his wife and child on somewhat less than $25 weekly. His rent at that tine was $59 per month. The possibility that he received out side help In repaying the government apparently hasnnot been raised in the press. surprisingly literate. a par play tog In contrat to the letters Oswald wrote to his mother, Governor Connally and Senator Tower, bis letters to the Falr Play for Cuba Committee are rather They do not appear to contaln his frequent misspellings and ungramatical languago. There have been no suggestions that he received help in framing the letters, and he told the IPCC that he was Iinancing his activitles on its behalf out of his ow pocket. BAGS 2000 11: ONLY --- ## Page 4 13-00000 SHOREI BACKGROWNO GOE ONL. NO FOLDEN OSSEA There is increasing evidence that Cswald and his wiie vere not happily narried. She vas vell liked and he was unpopular. She soned genuinely lond of tho United States, did not share his anti-merican viers and sosetimes spoke of the hard lile in the Sov let Usion. Oswald resented ber friends and beat her up on at last one occasion. Since he could not have planned the assassination of the President prior to 26 September-whon tbe Dallas trip vas announced could it be that his appliention for a passport (without one for Marina) on 29 Juno, his application for & lexican visa on 17 September and his trlp to Mexico City on 26 Beptember simply indicate that be planned to desert his wife and soek refuge in the sertet Unlon? Despite Mrs. Palne's testimony that Oswald could not drive, witnesses sald he drove klusell to the Dallas riflo range on one of his vialts.. Do vas driven there by a unidentified nan on his other trip. One witness also clalas that two non wore lavolved in the aftemptcyidently by Oswald-to shoot General Walker last April. Distribution: Orig. # 1 - Addressee — CD/SOV CB/SRIv SRI File SEE 2A BAC: 10 ONLY --- ## Page 5 13-00000 PHILE 22St Li Hesit COGE SQ. CE. 3. 41 BIEST FEST. COGE AFE (B) FOR FROKE MEMO FOR THE RECORD: CorRections to Record SUBJECT: DCI Testimony before the Warren Commission 1. 0/SR called me in re matter of correcting record of DCi's testimony before the Warren Commission. On page 6582 of transcript, Mr. Allen DULLES asked one of the key questions in the inquiry. Unfortunately, the question was badly phrased and contained an accurate statement. It was usggested that the following modification be made for the final record: Melief that mirk ME CD D: Does your answer, Mr. McCONE, include a negation of any belief that OSWALD was working for or on behalf of the Soviet intelligence services (originally phrased: on behalf of the Soveet Union) at any time?. This would require a slight change in Mr. MCCONE's testimony in which the words "intelligence services" would be substituted for HUnion! 1eluded 2. : In response to C/SR's request: I provided him with à brief statement to the effect that other defectors to the USSR had received subsidies or salary supplements vis the MVD. The Statement also in- cluded information concerning the role of the MVD in 1959 - 61. (Copy attached) Note: /s/: Lee H. Wigren C/SR/CI /R was advised by telephone that C/SR R used this on 18 May 1964. /s/ Document Number 628-305 for FOIA Review on JUN 1976 RECORD COPY 18 MAY64 201-289248 --- ## Page 6 13-00000 According to his own statements, Lee Harvey OSWALD received a lump sum of 5000 old rubles and a monthly salary supplemented by 700 old rubles. These funds were provided to him through the Soviet Red Cross, but OSWALD indicated his belief that these funds actually came from the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD). 2. Several other Americans are known to have received salary supplements while resident in the USSR. In two cases the Soviet Red Cross reportedly supported the defector and his family for as as six months. prior to resettlement. other cases it was not specified where the aid came other than Soviet Government or Soviet authorities. included payment of espenses until resettlement, medcial care, above-average salary for job done, and lump-sum payments in varying amounts. 3. Until January 1960, the All-Union Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) of the USSR was responsible for civil police func- tions (crime detection, traffic controls, administration of internal document controls, fire fighting and civil defense. In January 1960, the All-Union MVD was abolished and its func- tions were transferred to the MVD's of the fifteen républics: of the USSR.. The republic MVDs were renamed Ministeries for Maintenance of Public Order (MOOP) in mid 1962• Prepared for and delivered to C/SR on 18 May 1964 (AM) • Notified by phone that C/SR used this on 18 May. /s/ L..W. --- ## Page 7 13-00000 Sea Sanitines 1al0 Chamber FOr SterIa sORI SE 3949 E09WPEL --- ## Page 8 13-00000 SR/CI Memo 23 Novumber 1963 vacate ananation Departrest 241: 91 cover for their friarser there som sort of eyes business Vios Adulnal COPY oF 34-538 Document Number for FOlA Review on WAY: 1973 34-538 CoPs ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32304913.pdf
124-10287-10043
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
07/19/1965
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
105-86025-3RD NR 40
DIRECTOR, FBI
SAC, MM
7
FBI
HQ
02/28/2018
INC LHM
7
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 10/7/201 AGENCY : RECORD NUMBER : RECORD SERIES : AGENCY FILE NUMBER : FBI 124-10287-10043 HQ 105-86025-3RD NR 40 Document Information ORIGINATOR : FROM: TO: TITLE : FBI SAC, MM DIRECTOR, FBI DATE : 07/19/1965 PAGES : 7 SUBJECTS : LCA, ANTI-COMMUNIST, MILIAN, DANIEL, ASSOC, PLOT, ASSA, CASTRO, FIDEL DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION : Unclassified RESTRICTIONS : 4 CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 07/01/1998 OPENING CRITERIA : INDEFINITE COMMENTS : INC LHM v9.1 DocId: 32304913 Page --- ## Page 2 OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-107-02 MAY 1962 EDITION SA GEN. REG. NO. 27 UNITED STATES /ERNMENT Memorandum TO DIRECTOR, FBI (209-584) SECRET DATE: JUL 1 g 1965 FROM SAC, MIAMI (105-10278) (P) 10-23-94 KP&MACSAC Classified by SUBJECT: PLOT TO ASSASSINATE PREMIER FIDEL CASTRO DURING OCTOBER Declassity off: HOLIDAYS, 1965 IS - CUBA DECLASSIFIED BY 5668 SIR JKSR 3-2-98 ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS UN ASSIRED EXCERI WHERE SHOU/S l OTHERWiSE. At ReBuairtel to Miami 7/8/65 Enclosed herewith are 12 copies of a letterhead memorandum dated and captioned as above • Copies are being disseminated locally to the following agencies: -INS, CIA, Coordinator of Cuban Affairs - State Department, Border Patrol, Customs Miami, Region II, Miami, and Key West, Coast Guard, G-2, ONI and OSI: MM T-1 1S CARLOS ZARRAGA MARTINEZ, Key Source - Cuban. MM T-2 is MM 635-S. CIA HAS NO OGJECTION TO DECLASCITADGN AND/OR, MM T-3/16 MM 639-5. RELEASE OF CIA FORMATION (u) MM T-4 1s MM 492-S. IN THIS DOCUMENT. MKH 2-6-98 MM T-5 is MM 974-S. On July 5, 1965, U. S. Customs, Miami, advised that they had no information concerning the Sentinels of Liberty or that LUIS CONTE AGUERO was involved in any assassination plot. ENCLOSURE 2) - Bureau (Enc-12) (RM) 2 - Chicago (105-20239) (Enc-2) (RM) 1 - Miami RJD: 511 (5) 105-86325- NOT NECORDED 174 AUG & 1965 AUG 6196 SECHET U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan: $2, DocId:32304913 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 MM 105-10278 THER SECRET Copies of the letterhead memoranda prepared by the Chicago Office in this matter will be disseminated locally to federal agencies in Miami. MV 635-S said he will try to re-establish contact with CONTE AGUERO and will try to furnish coverage of his activities. MM The Miami Office will maintain contact with 635-S and other established sources and informants and will keep the Bureau advised. - LEAD - MIAMI AT MIAMI, FLORIDA Will contact CIA, Miami, to ascertain if that agency has an operational interest in CONtE AGUERO or Sentinels of Liberty. (5)U) It is noted that according to MM-685-s it has been reported also that CONTE's anti-communist speeches and radio activity have been for a long time indirectly sponsored by a U.S. government agency. SECRET 2 585-10123 DocId: 32304913 Page ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32292353-1.pdf
124-10209-10129
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
02/13/1962
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
92-3182-445
DIRECTOR, FBI
COOK, ROBERT A.
25
FBI
HQ
3/6/18
RPT, TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES 1a, 1b
25
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 6/12/201 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER : 124-10209-10129 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 92-3182-445 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: COOK, ROBERT A. TO: DIRECTOR, FBI TITLE : DATE: 02/13/1962 PAGES: 25 SUBJECTS : GAL, RES, TRA, ASSOC, GAMBLING, B/F INT, TESUR, MISUR DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION : Unclassified • RESTRICTIONS: 4 CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 04/28/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS : RPT, TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES 1a, 1b v9.1 390 --- ## Page 2 CG 92-373 INFORMANTS CG T-I is CG 6343-C*. CG T-2 is CG 6443-C, who was contacted by SAs WILLIAM A. MEINCKE and JOSEPH G. SHEA from December 8, 1961, through February 7, 1962. CG T-6 is PCI FRANK LA CROIX, contacted by SA ROBERT A. COOK from December 8, 1961, through February 7, 1962. CG T-9 is CG 6343-C*. CG T-18 is CG 6272-C, who was contacted by SA WILLIAM F. ROEMER on December 8, 196%. CG T-25 is CG 6486-C*. CG T-27 is a mail cover on the mailing address of GUS ALEX at 9353 South Spaulding, Evergreen Park, Illinois. CG T-29 is CG 6502-C*. on December 8, 19615 OG 8498-PC, contacted by SA ROMER CG T-31 is CHARLES POSTL, Owner of Postl's Heälth Club, who was contacted by SA COOK on February 7, 1962, (upon request). CG T-32 is CG 6502-C*. CG T-33 is CG 6232-C, contacted by SA MEINCKE on December 12, 1961. CG T-34 is PCI JOSEPH T. O'HARA, JR., contacted by SA VINCENT L. INSERRA on December 8, 1961. COVER PAGE Sealersa --- ## Page 3 CG 92-373 trouble PEARIMAN would bring his problems to KOLITZ and KOLITZ in turn would see GUS ALEX or one of his associates in order to get the matter straightened out. He stated that® KOLITZ was also formerly connected with the • Blatz Distributing Company in Chicago and is believed to have secured this employment because he knew GUS ALEX. - STEVE' DE KOSTA CG T-2 advised that STEVE DE KOSTA is a very close friend of ALEX. He said that DE KOSTA has taken over in the management of My Lady Fair, a new key club on the Near North Side of Chicago. It is to be noted that DE KOSTA was reportedly the former owner of the Hucksters Club and Old Chicago Room, which are both now out of business. CG T-2 stated that ALEX used to frequent the Hucksters Club but seldom visited the Old Chicago Room because it was located in the Parkway Hotel, which is a hangout for burglars and prostitutes and always had too much "heat" around for ALEX. *ll CG I-was under the impression that AlEX and hair suSk were the actual owner of the Old Chicago Room and that DE KOSTA was just a front for them. HENRY SUSK CG T-29 advised that HENRY SUSK, owner of Henry Susk Pontiac, Chicago, is a very close friend of GUS ALEX. He stated that he received information that SUSK was in the company of ALEX during the latter part of January, 1962. It is to be noted that SUSK in the past has admitted lending ALEX automobiles to use whenever he requested one. NICK CONTOS Mr. NIKOLAOS NIKITAKIS Aliens Directorate, on December 12, 1961, advised continues to reside at 29 K Kota Street, Ney Psychico, Athens. KONTOS is not known n to have engaged in any contacts or activities which would be the subject of any police action. It is to be noted that CG T-27 has advised that ALEX has received mail in the past from NICK CONTOS residing in Athens, Greece. -4 - +097-3152-445 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10179-10134.pdf
104-10179-10134
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
06/19/1963
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
PARIS
RAY CONTACTED BY JERVAY 17 AND 18 JUNE.
3
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-15 : F10 : 20040303-1053811 :
3
## Page 1 104-10179-10134 IT+ X 221-239218 SECREL ROUTING TO ''DIRECTOR TE • FROM ": PARIS ACTION: SAS Ô (SAS NOTIFICO AND COPY SLOTTER AT 1735 19 JN DD) RETERN TO CIA INFO : DOP, 68, CL/OPS, CI/OA, FI, RI/AN, ME A NAS 7, S/C. 2 Mad i ee cart Merica Background Use Only MAISHED.* IN63271 SEC RET! 77272 APRITY DIR INFO PRITY MAOR SJAN VAVE ROUTINE BRUS CITE PARI 9868 RET A PARI 0808 (IN (01964) 1:9 JUN 1963 B PARE 9849 NOT SENT SUAN BRUS LIN (03094) 1• RAY CONTACTED BY JERVAY & UNDER IDEN A ALIASS 1T AND 18 CON SETAI JUNE IN ADDITION CONTACTS REPORTED PARA ONE PARI 8824 APAY NAS ALSO BEEN IN CONTACT UNRUMBLE 6. UNPAPIST, AND AT LEAST ONE COM TACT WITH AMSPORT SO RAY DESIGNATEO UNRUMBLE 6 AS HIS CONTACT MAN PARI® JERVAY NOT INTRODUCED BUT WILL CONTACT SHORTLY STA FEELS THIS IS 8000 MOVE SINCE CUNTUMBLE 6 APPEARS BE GOOD MAN AND HAS APPROACHED DNA IN PAST SEPARATELY FROM UNRUMBLE 2 WITH SOME • INTERESTING PLANS. STA DID "NOT APPROASH HIN DIRECTLY IN PAST BEAUSE DID NOT MANT TO DISTURA RELATIONSHIE VITH RUMSLE 2. CORATOLE 2 VILL NEVERTHELS DE VICTING USUMBLE & CURRENT PELATIONGNZDO NOT VAS DRIVEN AIM SY ALENO DIE UNGE RAY SPENT MUCH TISE UND UHO BLENS DE CLOSEST TO MAN ANONG DIe CONTACTE PARISS on cor parts over utens, CONTINUE MONITOR DEVELOPN HES ICPRODUGTONEY OTHER. AHRA THE FICE 19 P SOMOTES NATION. д/р) --- ## Page 2 1d-0d0d OLASSIFIED MESSAGE SECRET IN 63₴ - rAGE 2. ARJU RAY SELTEVES CABRERA WILL VORX ON ARCOS BUT SAYS MAN WHO •COULD REALLY DO THE JOB IS ARCOS UNCLE NHO IN PUERTO RICO AND KNOWN TO RAY ME COULD NOT REMEMBER NAME OR EXACT RELATIONSHIP. dUI PLANS CONTACT MIM ON RETUMN AND GROOM MIM FOR TASK. RAY ASKED BE INFORMED WHEN ARCOS RETURNS BRUS. A KUBARY STAFFER CIDEN 8) OF CONGRESS OF CULTURAL FREEDOM BET RAY AT LEAST TWICE. EXCELLENT RAFPORT. ME ARKANGED RAY'S PRESS INTERVIEN VITH GUILLO CO AULINS (INCORRECTLY REPORTED IN PARA FIVE PARI 89478 SE LE MONDE. ALSO ARRANGED DINNER S JUNE. WAS NONCOMMITAL BUT ENCOURAGING ABOUT JOB POSSIBILITY FOR FRANQUI, SHOULD HE DEFECT. SO RAY SEEMS TO BE CONFIDENT FRANQUI WILL JOIN HIS CAMP IN NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE AND RELYING ON CABRERA TO CONTINUE WORK B ON SEANS PARO SO GOT SEE SO LANS PROCEED A ONE LINES DIR A8158 AND PARI 9067J NOT SENT SUAN BRUS). POSSIBLE REFERENCE TO GUEDE TALK VITH FRANQUI IS IN& JUNE Сивок. MARIO SPRESUMABLY THIRO SECY MARIO GRACIA VARELA CALLED FROM THE EXHIBITION SAYING "THAT SOME ANTI-CASTRO ELEMENTS WERE ABOUT AND THAT FRANQUE ASKED FOR SOME MORE PEOPLE FRON THE EVASS L4 TO BE AROUND THE EAHIEITION ALSO 12 VEINE UNSIERRA (ORS Aru: is (com ENTS TO UNSNATU. 16 THAT *SOME "GUSANUS" VERE AT THE PHOTOBRAPIZE EXHIBITION AND THE FRENCH COLICE VENT: BY CUBAN ENS TO ASK IF THEY SHOULD GUARD THE EKHIBIT. NOVEVER HIS LATTER PROUNDLY NOT REFERENCE TO SUEDES DERER THAN DILS STA MES NO INDICATION TRANQUI MIS TALKED ARONT ARERONE TO BEN BAY TEELS TOUP EURORE WAS VERY PROITABLE DEPTE PReT HE HAS NO FIRE COMMETIHENT EBOX FRANQUIS CABRERA OR ARCOS NE a Sara --- ## Page 3 RUSSIFICO MESSAGE SECRFT IN 63371 PAGE 3 • BIG,SECHS CONFIDENT THEY VILL JOIN MIM EVENTUALLY. NE FEELS HE NAS TISHTEVED UP AND INSPIRED HIS "ORGANIZATION" PARIS. SAYS HAS GAINED AMPRESSION FROM TALKS VITH CUBANS HERE THAT DISILLUSION- MENT AYONG CUBAN EMBASSIES AND OFFICIALS INSIDE CUBA HAS GROWN CONSIDERABLY. RAY CONVINCED IT POSSIBLE TO OVERTHROW CASTRO CLEANLY AND SIMPLY WANTS DEVOTE OUN APPARATUS TO IDENTIFYING DISAFFECTED ELEMENTS IN CUBA AND BUILDING UP SUPPLY APPARATUS IN •AND OUTSIDE CUBA TO SERVE THEY Bo RAY ASKED FOR FOLL A• UP TO DATE LIST OF PERSONNEL AND ADDRESS OF ALL CUBAN EMBASSIES IN EUROPF, TO BE PASSED HIM IN SUAN AND UNRUMBLE & IN PARIS. HE WANTS BEGIN MAILING PROPAGANDA AND LETTERS TO STIMU® LATE FURTHER DISAFFECTION •ERSONNEL® & TRAINING OF HIMSELF IN SUAN AND UNRUMBLE & PARI IN IDENTICAL SU SYSTEM WHICH THEY CAN USE FOR CORRESPONDENCE BETVEEN SJAN AND PARI AND ALSO INTO CUBA. STA FELT BOTH THESE IDEAS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED AND RAY WAS TOLD COULD BE DONE. WOULD APPRECIATE HOS PROVISIAN OF ITEM Á AND DESIGNATION OT SU SYSTEM. CO RAY ALSO ASHED WE LINE UP JOB FOR CABRERA AS EUROPE REP SUME PAPER AS DISCUSSED VITH MAUMAN PER PARI B94T, VOULÉ APPRI- CRATE MAS FOLLOWUP ON THIS • FILL ONE SOLTO ACOONPLISIENT OY NAME TRIP WAS RELE TONINENT-OF VORKENS MELATION DED RNS BELIEVE HE MET IT ONE APPORT WHICH MAT ALLENTATE B04S SUNT DOHE PAST PROBERNS NUBA RELAFIONSHIP IC.. INDER C/S CONCERTO DRAY DEPARTINO PART NE O1S ARIVINO NY 1300 MOUS 10 20 SECRET C SECRET ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10216-10151.pdf
104-10216-10151
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
1/6/64
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
MEXICO CITY
CABLE: REF DOES NOT INCLUDE TELEPHONE NUMBER. PLS CABLE
2
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-51 : F2 : 20040315-1057868 :
2
## Page 1 104-10216-10151 = 25-2522741 Вана по еще то - 3 0 321234 I88: 09 105 165a ClASSIED ESSAGE PILE ID DES HOT L 500 12.2 SECRET • DIRECTOR M Fatta ; MEXICO CITY AClichie WH 8 (TEMPO FOR WAI SLOTTED AT: 1900 6 MAN. G ON) '1R6t: • DOP, C1/04, SE 4, SAS 8, VR •E CRET 062333?. PRIORITY DIR CITE NEXI 7650) (EASBY ACTING) PERIMEN DEGRIP REF& MMMW 12233 REF DOES NOT INCLUDE TELEPHONE NUMBER OF ERNESTINA. ROUTING PLS CABLE JAS: 7147 ROUTING INITIAl RID/AN IAD/AIS R • P REVI WH3/MEX DESTROY SECRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMIBITED so. 229. 108g 1 389 RI COPY : RI COPY 135. --- ## Page 2 14-00000 003 DATE : 6 JANUARY 195% : DIRECTOR "ROM : MEXICO CITY ACTION: SAS 8 NFO : MH 7. VR CLASSIFIED MESSAGE 34/25 SECRET 1 2 DE" INFO Satus JAN. 79 19302 64 ACTION CHANGE ROUT INE IN 93118 A MEXI 7650 CITE PERUMEN DEGRIP C/S COMMENT: ACTION RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS CABLE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM WH TO SAS BY R. SCOTT WH DIV, EXT. 5940 IN COORDINATION WITH N. SANCHEZ SAS DIV. EXT, 7147. EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC DON~ SECRET GRADING AND DECLABSIFICATION REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. Copy No. ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10291-10019.pdf
104-10291-10019
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
01/01/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
GEORGE MARTIN ROSNEK.
67
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-58 : F17 : 1998.04.17.12:33:21:640082 : NOT BELIEVED RELATED
67
## Page 1 104-10291-10019 SECRET - SECURITY INFORMARON CONTRACT PERSENREL OFFICE OF PERSONNEL RETURN FILE TO SE 45 NOTICE: This is an Độc fue of Personnel File and subject to 1o day limitat ion 'period. This has beun charged file and is due do he returned to CONTRACT DIVISION, 5E-65 Hgs., ×784 COU 2008/25 --- ## Page 2 admi Dear Mr l Reference is made to your contrnct with the U. S. Goternmont as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 1970, as amendede Effective & April 1979, paragTaph four (4) entitlod "Compensation" to an nded by doleting the figure 837,270 as it appears therely and substituting la lou thereos the figure 341, 270. Said paragrap so don" i 10 aloo modilled to provido that rubsequent sumentation of your baute foe, based upon the peroentage increase. authorised U.%, Goverent ciploycon la tho anmuel Rectolative Per Increason, vis be individually authorized by contract amendrient ate proprtato tined as requested and cents fled by the responsible ament officiel, provided homever, that your total comendson under thia perppraph doen net exceed, the setary rot. 63-650 äll other terms and Conditions of + 1e convenet, an amendid, isman in fuel fare and effect.% --- ## Page 3 14-00000 ACHINISTRATIVE - INIEMiAL USE CNLY Dear Coctive 7 october 192 peregregh four (0) artier tea by-non: * montod by deletino the facure 801270 03. 12 appeas. etatuting an laou thereor the Pagure 300, 15% Alt other, Losed art condations of the contrect. cut forco land offecto UNTICO STATES COVER ACMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY 1115178 --- ## Page 4 14-00000 sis a. 597-58 SECRET 1579.190171 5 998 C1 321-79 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division - TRONG 1d. H. Blee: Chie e Counterintelligence Staff THROUGHS Career Management. Staff lanpower and Support Branch/Contráct -SUBJ idment: to Contract for QuE 1) entitled "Conpensations ofs subice ti re ective sir Naren. 1970 Fe is cherch regu sandi che: 514 hoe the run 270 be delete as amender subs attired, thereins crease represents the percentage ingrease: (z percent) authorized US Government employees on the annual Legislative ray increase etrective October 1979 2 All classified Secret David H. Blee CONCUR: got 79 Chief, Contract Personnel Division Da-te CL BY 063765 RVW: 5 Oct 99 DRV D9c. 1 SECRET --- ## Page 5 •ADMINT: DIVE - INTERLIN USE ONLY Dear reference is made to your contract with the ünited States Government. as 9a sented Er the Centräl Intelligence Reeney, effective 1 March 1970, fective & Baril 1979, paragraph four: (1) entitled "Carpensation" ts sended by caleting there gues 637,270 as fit appears therein and by subser sting an a eu thered agre guzest 70. Sata paragraph: ts alsor not ento premise. that subes. NO BICE Increase auth enmente hostes contraet ene gustaveren requested Kbr the responsible: Gavechnem onensat ton. under this paragrap does not exceed the equivatent rot the satary robe pata at the top step ot GS 25352 in othes ters and conditions of the contract, is mended; renain tri full force and effect. CEVIRAL ININLIGENCE AGENCY 13/ ocritracting Officer *11 AR. 1919 Đã tẻ 11.1 APR 1979 Đặt c David I. Ble 12 APR 1979 Date ADVINISTRITIVE - INTERAAL, USE OVIS --- ## Page 6 14-00000 SECRET 29 MAR CI 121-79 SGEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division FROM David H. Blee: Chtef, Counterintelligence Staff THROUGH chief carpose career upport tie Sa/Contract Career Management SUBJECT Amendent to Contract for •Action: Keque ede us reques go chas the contract ans Independent contractoi his compensation from 537,270 to 341270 per annum offective 8 Ap711 1979, Rackground. In Septembor 1978] This $20,000 clain has become an-vosession wish and is likely to affect negatively his relationship wey one agency unless rosolved to his relative. satisfaction. Attached for backeround information are documents relating to Mr. clại. in this casc it Mol casey consideratise of ty cutties torolved dictate. that ve settle clatm In the following manner: I will approve an increase in hts. annual parment by 54, 000 effective April 1979 (from $37,270 to $41,270)- his annual compensation would be Increased each such time CE BY 063765 RVIV ' 26 Mar 99 DRV D9c.I SECRET --- ## Page 7 SECRET reaches the salary pald an employce in the stop of GS-15 (currently $47,500) his annual compensation would be increased only as the pay for that step increases.. amended, remain in All other terms and conditions of sald contract. as full force and effect. 5. All classified Secret David: R. Bloe: Attachme As 3 + 3 CONGURA Chief, Career Management Staff O3 APR ST - Da te. APPROVED: Chief, Contract Personnel Division Date: 2 S ECRET Her a ne --- ## Page 8 SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM Chief, counterintelligence Staff SUBJECT REFERENCES PODONOR •A. Memo Dated lo Februsry 1970 From DC/Security Rescarch Start Acknowledgment end Rolease Form Dated 12: July 1973 A careful review of the PRONOR 110 substantiates the ract chae chore were circe unequivocal fianctal comms t= ments made to PiONoR at the time ot his defection in February 1904. These: three commitments nere. ile would bê paid $2S,000 for each of . the two years he cooperated in place. Total $50,000. •b.. He would receive $t0,000 for has part in jdentifying William Vassale a British Admiralty employce as a NoB agent. C i He mild récaive $25,000 per year salary, the Agency 2 o The question at issud how is whether an additional comnitment was also made to. PDDONOR. to the effect that thé: Agency would provide Emanciat assistance to him to purchase a home: According to PDUONOR, to his dee on ace or aton eith dis case officer. Mr • he stated, "i will arfre with what I have. on: my back no home. no roof no anything." the reply to PDDONOR™ -be WaS. as follows: "This will be taken care of. 'It will provided This exchange in PDDONOR's view, constituted COOL ERV 14 Fob-90 DRY 09c. 1 _BY. 063765 S E CRET --- ## Page 9 SECRET what he believes a coumitment on the part of the Agency to provide. him with financial in the purchase. of A memorandum dated 16 Fobruary 1970 written by Mr: Bruce Solle describes this verbal exchange between PDONOR and his case officer. (See Reference A). In addition, memorondum dated: 14 August 1972 also written by Mi. SoMe (Reference D) states that "Nosenko stated that prior to his he discussed his future-with Bagley and made three requests, being; Employment at $25,000 per year; b: $50.000 In savings accounts Assistance in purchasing house. According to Nosanko, Nosenko that his coucts considers. this constituted a valid, verbal contracte From PiNONOR's viexpoint therefore an additional commitment, quito separate and apart from the three listod in paragraph 1 was made to him. Consequently, she now argues that a paynent made to him in July 1970, in the anount of $20, 000 and which he used as a downpayment on a housc, was the fulfilinent of this additional commitment and not part the $50,000 he was promised. for his two years as Mr. Solie statos in paragraph S "Nosenko also considers that the assistance in purchasing furniture nouses etc, which he has been given since 1969 should be considered as cancelling the matter of the 350,000. 4. What seems to have occurred is a change of position- on PUDONOR's part. while previously acknowledging that the original 350,000 commitment had been below listed payments only: $30,000 should be applied against the $50,000 commatment. The July 1970 payment of $20,000. should be applica against a separate commitment to provide purchasing a home. 2- SECRET --- ## Page 10 SECRET $2,000 in March 1964 $8,000 1n. May 1969 55,000 on. July 1970- $20,000 on 1 July 1970 (According to PDDONOR this payment Should not be applied against the $50,000 commitnent) $15,000 on 12 July 1973 Thuse to pDONORs reasonins $20,000 is still due him as part of the original $50.000 commitment. Several additionat pornts: should be noteds. on. 2 July 1973 PDDONOR signed an "Acknowledgment rand Releasey: prepared by the cencrat Counsel in which, PDONoRereleases and. forever discharges. she US. Government and the Agency from. any Claim for moncy prowlsed to him: (Reference C) addis ton the issue, of the 20, 000 he says is suri owed him does not surface: Min: the file unti Sentember 19790 14ycars after his defection. The explanation of why this resue would arise at this tate date is not cicar from available: records. Attached are copies of those documents which impact. on this issue. Because of the complexities of this case I recommend that we reguest.the Office of General Counsel to $20,000 After such a ruling we can discuss our future course of action. 7. Ail classified Secret • в гротчуіа Attachments: AS Stated SECRET --- ## Page 11 * SECRET A OGC 79-02042 1 March 1979 MEMORANDUN FOR FROM SUBJECT Chief; Counterintelligence Staff John Rizzo Assiatant General Counsel Financial Commitments to PDDONOR/1 Thio: 13 in response to yous memorandum ot webruary wich sequeste europinton concerning.CrAxe obligations to PrONAR/laxtormer higher " KGB.: retected to ths countrysen february 196 zaftes: having: coopens sed. place for the prey lous two Years Based on, information contained in CT. Stoff tilee. there appears ne quest ton. chat the Agency made thice docu mented, detections negul vecat promises to PopoNOR/l at the time of his he would be paid a total of $50,000 • 15250000 per anñum) in consideration for his previous: tho years' service in placer b) he would receive a $10,000 payment for his part in identifying a certain KGB operative in the British government; and c) he would be placed under contract for an indefinite period" yearLy provision for retfrement and other benefits. Your menorandum seeks our assistance In resotving the issue of whether of not the Agency hat, as PoDoNOR/d asserts, any current, independent obligation to pay PDDONOR/1 S20,000 based on an oral commitment made to him by, à now retired CIA officer at the time of hts defection promising him the Agency's Financial assistance In his securing a restdence in this country: ORIGINAL CLBY _ 03577:9 O DECLE REVICH 28 ECh 99 EXT BYND 6 YRS BY 3ame REASON. 3d (3) ALL PORTIONS ARE CLASSIFIED SECRET ATTACHMENT --- ## Page 12 I SECRET 2. As you know, due to unforseen and extraordinary factors which arose shortly after PDDONOR's defection. three documented comnitments made to him as outlined the in the previous paragraph. were not fulfilled until some years after his defection. In this connection, the file indigates that PEONORA did not start receiving an Ageney salary unttl March: 1969, and that it was not until six years later that he began to be paid. at the previously promised rate of $25,000 per arnum. Accordingly, in order to belateaty satisty in full the commitments originary made to DONORy In 1964, Jump-sum payments have been made to him on three occasions in recent years with the approval of senior Agency managenent Bered yo these lump-sum payments consisted of: Sy1900 tess taxes) in November 1922.to coverscho balance owed fordealery auring the pertod Aps 196 Ato March 1969b: 315,000 in July 1973 to setole the remainder in place overseas prion to his defectiong and c) $28:500- (authorized in April 1976 but evidently notepala until late cast year) to cover the balance of his previously promised as well as the $10.000 commitment originally made to PDDONOR/1 prior to his February 1964 defection (see paragraph t(b) above) for his role in identifying a certain kGB operative in England. As previously tion stated, the sole issue for considera- at this point revolves around PDDONOR/l's rclatively! recent assertion that CIA still owes him $20,000 as a result of a vaguely worded oral comnitment made to him by a now- retired Agency officer in 1964 who promised that CIA would provide housing for IDDoNor/i in this country following, his arrival. In analyzing eDdONOR/l's contentions In this regard, we believe for the following reasons that the details surrounding CIA's July 1973 payment to him of $15, 000 assume particular stonificance and do; in fact, firmly rule out any. further, outsfanding legal obligation to him with respect to payments to cover PODONÖR/1's éventual purchase of a höme. Of course, the key consideration involved is the fact that the s15,000 payment was made following PDDONOR/ll execution of a quitclaim prepared by this office through which he agreed to "celease, and forever discharge.. the: Central; Intelligence Agency: from any claim for money promised to him for, and/or at. the time of his defection, and from any and all other clates in any form whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with his cooperation with... CIA prior to the date of this document, 12 July 1973.* SECHET P --- ## Page 13 14-00000 ¿ SECRETA Thus, the wording of the quitclaim is clearly and purpose fully unconditional and is specifically intended to bar the kind of belatedly raised Claim which PoDONoR/lis raking now. 4. In taking this position, we recognize that one out in rebuttal that notwithstanding the scemingly all encompassing scope of the guitclot, further payment of $28,500 wag in fact subseguently author 1zed fOr PDDONOR 1 In April 1976. However an internal OGC memorandum dated I April 1976 which concurred to this additional $20/500 payment, the real purpose of the 12 July release was to settle once. and for all the losue of the balance. of the $50.000 owed PRONOR fOE Wis two years of in place cooperation pelor to his detectione Recordy Yo paynerases intended to satists other pre- existing comitments to pronore. base are owes fox. 1964-1969 as. weitas the 50,000 promised tor ma role this offlee Condicate that an operate paymentands vegan parassed- ble since to was outside, the Intended scope of the guitclaim and was being used to tuttift separate. fully documented promises of compensation made earlier to him. 1973 5. BY contrast; at the time that CIA made Ats July payment to PDDONOR/1 In return; for his quitclaim, the avallable background materials contained in the files you have provided us loave little doubt that the issue of compen sation to cover his purchase of a home was an Intrinsic part of the calculations which led to the decision to 3ИEл0г120: the $15,000 payment to him at that time. For Instance? in the 25 June 1973 menorandum to Me. Colby which contained the [commendation for the s15,a00 payment, the director ot Security delineated some of the previous advances made to PoDoNoR/1 in partial Batisfaction of the s50,000 owed to hin tor the 1962-64 period. It was specifically noted in that connection. that "Tadgainst thus 1S50,000l Sum in April-May for resettlement An e private aconomy and. es. coo (PDDONOR/1l was given s8, 000 as financial assistance a new house and othes related- expenses s These mounts Plus an addattonal $2,000 which had bech prevtously advanced were sustracted from the original $50,000 commitment, thus lcading to the final figure of $5, 000 that was. subsequently paid in July 1973 and for which he readily signed the quitclatt re leasing CIA from any further financial obligationa to him.: Director of Security's memörändum went on tó indicate The that PDDONOR/1 agreed* with these calculations: morecter PDDONOR/1's acknowledgment that CIA had previously fulfilled its SEGREES 3 --- ## Page 14 A SECRET S commitments to him regarding a house is more explicitly documented in a 14 August 1972 memorandum for the ffle from the Deputy Chief, Security Research Group, which quotes PDDONOR/I as saying that he considers that the assistance matter of the 550,000*• (Emphasis added): 6% Therefore, from all. of the above, it must be coy. crudes that. contrary to PoDoNOR/l's assertions, crAhas long since fulfilled any promises which Agency representa? tivos made to him prior to his defection concerning his housing in this country. further, the avallable evidence clearly tends to indicate thet PoDoNON. fullyurdorstood. and accepted the fact. that these obligat one hath been Caly at 10B% Since, the couns and scope os the quitclaim ano fully controlling.on. the claim which PronoRs to asserting we have determined that the Agency has no, legat, outgat on whatsoever tỏ pay tìm the 520,000 which he seekee As a final note, this olfice rocognites that. not" withstanding the absence of any legal obligations, the par- Licularly sensitive status. of eddonor/1 within CIA may nevertheless give rise to an understandable desire in some quarters to make the $20.000 payment to him on security and/or moral grounds. We do not necessarily quarrel with •such a viCW, nor do we mean to imply that cIA is legally precluded from, in effect. "waiving" the terms of the quit claim if it so chooses. At the same time, it must be remen bered that this office was asked to prepare the gurkelaim at: issue in 1973 precisely in anticipation.of a situation. such as the one beföre us now. it is respectfully submitted that such documents will cease to have any future efficacy.or credibility whatsoever if individuals such as PDONOR/I who are ostchsibly bound by them perceive a willingness on the aside these carefully worded and legally binding documents whenever a claim (no matter how til founded) is advanced. short, we hope and trust, that any based on truly compelling security or moral considerations Jen a Pass at SEGRE L 4 --- ## Page 15 CHINIS RATIVE - ITS CREE ONLY Dear clarence la made to your contract with the U. B. Germent, a epresented by the Central Intelligenco Agencil, effective 1 March 1970, a "It in the courán of this contract you are airected. to traval or nue to ta care the calcion of the content, as mened, tate te VE - INTETAL, USE ONLY --- ## Page 16 AMENISE Dear Reference lo male do your contract with the unital states soroement. represented by the cantral. Intelligence Agendy, elfective 1 Marcti 1970, aman lode Elective 8 April 197%s parograph tour, (l) entitled, pompensation" anion deleting the floure sa7,270 as it appete thereln an by quo tituting In lieu thered the figure eno. said paragroch to alco paleted to proude that abegunt musentation of your baste fog, bored be indiytuy authorized br contraction estad and certifles by. the reaponatole Gover official, prostied holes a that your toes? Opansation undor ente paragr Dog not encood che egulvalent of thi A Man treat coltion de de enret, el conte, re to CENTRAL INALITICS AGONY EX: KIRKSSI APPROVED:- 13 ADMINISTRATIVB - INTRUME UBR ONLY --- ## Page 17 14-00000 Atlantil d. Mr. Bruce A, Bertotally Dear Mr. Bertotally: Reference Is made to your contract with the United States Government, as represented by the Contracting Officer, effective 1 March 1970, as amended. Effoctive 3 October 1978 paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" 1s amended by deleting the figure $35,327 as it appears therein and by substituting In lieu thereof the figure $37,270. All other tems and conditions of the contract, as amended, remain in Pull force and effect. UNITED STATES GOVERIMENT contracting officer м вн в 2005 10/10/28 Admidistrative - literal Use Os., --- ## Page 18 14-00000 ADMINISTASCENE - IRREMAL USE ONLA Dearl Ratorenco le made to your contriot with the Unitel Statur Coverment, as representad by the Contral Intelligunce Ayancy, offoctivo 1 Marchi 1970, a8 amundad." Effectivo 9 October L0T7 paragraph four (1) entitio) "Ompensation" Is emmlal be deleting the figura $33,000 an 1t agoars theral and by substituting In leu theraof the figure $33,327. Sall paragraph Is also molitled to provide that mibrewent augentation of your busic fee, lanes uoon cost of-living Insreases, will be Individually athorizel by contract anenment at appropriate time's as roguested and cortified by the responsible Covermant offIcial•… Nil other ters and conditlons of the contract, as amanded, remain in full force and eftact. Bi i tri COVIRAL INTO LIGENCE AGENCI 13eu 1771 Spactal Contracti 78. VITYRESI Da APPORT ?.-" --- ## Page 19 Diar L saference la mile to your contract with the ünited Stäter Owernment, as represented by the Central Iritelligence Agency, effective l March 1970, as amin leil. Eatective 16 mbruary 1977 parzarash four (4) entitled "Corpensation" 18 mena by cather laing you a one-time, Jump sin tirable payment in tha amount of $2,100. ALl other berms anl conditions of the contract, no amendort, remain In full force and effect. RAL, INTELL • - AGENCY all Cont acting Of 2 ger 28 Da ba 15/ 2: Cgs 28 APPROVID: B. 21. heTh Date --- ## Page 20 AGMINS/ANTRE INTONEL USE ONLY Dear Reference 13 male to your contract ilth the Unftail States Covernment, as represented by the Central Intelligenca Agency, effective l March 1970, as Refective 1 June 1977 parugraph. Elva (5) entitlod "allaner, Tearol, ani other Expenseg" la amended by expanding its sope to authorize the cincurtent.. pluntary, tratel of your dependent wilo, incluling the apperprtate eate o par diem. when it la datemind by the responsible Government otticial thal such travel a support and best serve eparationas Interesta am opectives. The extent and destinations of such depen lent travel will be an destonated and defined by such offictal and, when in the course of such travel if lo Setarimd as a mitter of operational necensity of as a matter essentlal to her health me vell boing that she remin at sine partleilar plice in the course of such travel unile you continua on to specifie geographical locattons in tulellment of Government netther Inters or assums eny Mast lily of hat ever nablure concerning her health and well baing tenans freety electe-to invertake such travel: in full orree te is md condithmt of the contract, as ambay, rematin and effet DIVRAL INSLLIGACE ADICY: BY: special tractim olliont pate: WITHESS: 15/ 2 2:8 Date APPROVED: Date --- ## Page 21 OGC 78- 0606 1-31-15 SECRET Bertotally, Bruce A. 30 January. 1978 ME GRANDUN: FOR: Chef, Countorintelllgence Staff VIA: Offica of General Counsel, OND; Attention: Mr. John Risto FROM: SUB LET REFERENCE: Chief, Contract Forsonnel Division Contruct Arendment for onoranden from Chiot, Cl Staff, dated 20 December 1977 Referenced. menorandin percained. to, ornal roquest to amend sub jot contract to proM de author fratan do to cite operato do get (S) Paragraph Elve (S) of Subject's current contract. anong other. things, provided for It is our opinion that the intent hore was to provide authorization for expenditures for "Operational" purposes no language boing goneral. and non-restrictive in saturo, it would follow that aiy expenditum deemed by you, as the operating activity, to bo of an operatlonal nature, and so authorized, would be within the framork of the authortzation and that there would be no need to specifically identify and addictonally authorize the icon invor its value. Accordingly no netton Is taken upon your request, it boing presuned that you already have adequate contractual authority. /8; + 1481-399918 Concur : Lai John A. Risso: * "Offico of Coneral Counsel Distribution: Orig & 1 - Addressee 1 - OGC/O6MLD 246 OP/CHD. Date: & FEB 1970 3ECRET E2 IMPUET CL BY: 063837 --- ## Page 22 Dear Ref. In unde to your contract sith the aû. Garlo, du represented by the central Intelllience Agenes, effective 1 March 1970, as amendedlo Erfoctivo 26 Doc, 1973 parnerapi five (5) catiuled "Allowances, Iravel, and other Expences" In mended by the deletion of the last sentence to 1t0-- entirets and by aubctituting in lleu thereor the following: - EIr In tho course of thie contract you are directed to travel or are. authorized to incur other expenses, retabursenent of auch expenses vill "be made on: à commuted rate bacio, based on constructive cost, nite in the In the washinston stropolitan area. This commuted rite sun will hot be inconcent reduced by my operational entertalment that may be provided to you." All other tents and condition of the contract, as emended, rematr in fula force and veffect.. Signature. +156+01522-094 --- ## Page 23 1d-0n0d SECRET 26:98, CI 194-78 MEMORANDUM FOR: Contract Persenael Division FROM David H. Blee Chief, Counterintelligence Staff THROUCH: Chief, Career Munacement Staff Manpower and Sapport Branch/Contract SUBJECT: Contract. Amendrent for Bruce A. BERTOTULLY Astion Requested: It is requested that the contract: for Bruce A. BERIOTAL an Independent Contractor, be amended by consing the est sentence, on caragraph so allowances travels ands other penses, to read as colors: "Ifph the course of this contract, you are directed reimbur sement.of to meason of much cared in one prene commuted in the at to me rope can ant the connehile commuted: rate sun will not be, reduced by any operational entertainment that may be provided to you. Background:- Because of the current wording in paragraph's of BERTOTALLY's contract, C/PCS/CSS/B&F believes that a reduction in BERTOTALLY"S commuted rate entitlement must be made when operational entertainment (meals) provided him by his casc officer. are.. based on the present wording in This interpretation is the contract stating that rcimbursement for expenses will be in "substantial accordance with CIA resulations Since unter CIA regulations a re duction in per dien is effected when meals are provided by the Government, C/PCS/CSS/B&F belteves the language of the contract should be amended to permit operational entertainment (meals) torbe provided to Subjock without resultant deduction. in his commuted rate reimbursement= 3. All other terms and conditions of the. contract remain in full force and effect. David H. Blee David H. Blee CONCUR: DERIVATIVE CL BY 043142 O DECLE REVW ON Di DiaS • DERIVEDFROM 9C -1 C/CMS SECRET --- ## Page 24 -Hey Bruce Me Borestally Dear Mi. Berto 1215 Ref, to kare to your contrass with the U.s. Gort., as represented Dy the Central Inalligence Ageroy, effective 1 March 1910, an aended, rend vity speciese reference to the amendment erfective 1 June 3911 pertaining to travel as authorizos in paragrapa fre (5) entitled Morancose Trevel and other Bigennes." Pirective i June 29171 the lest sentence of -cald parnerati a Foe senso of vadea pertetna to the importtion and the mubjoctlvets.of.tande.rne tved inder the contractato tires, lu daleted in ito entirety Eitective 2S Jens 1918 data & 1a Further amended by expanding the scope of pariao four (1) till copensation to provide for then author, ratlon of a one time to eus payment in the angunt of triot. All ather tens and confitions of the contract, an anended, remale ti full force and effect.. --- ## Page 25 •L " hilLiAL VoE UNlI Pr. Drucó A. Bertorally Dear He: Sertotally: Roference 1a nada to your controct vith tho Unitod Statea Covoramant. ad representod by the Contral Intellieence Acency, allectiva 1 March 1970, emundod, elth specifie refarence to the amendeont effective ! June 1977 portaintag to travol ao authoriaed la parasraph five (1) anticlod "Allovancoo, Travol and other Expensos." Refoctive 1 June 1977. the last sentence of sald paragraph, the senno of valch partalas co the imposition and the subjoctivaty. of funda recoivod undor cho contraét to cara, la delecad in 1ca entirety. ¿§loctive 25 January 1978 nald contract to furthur amended by expandtos: cha sou of parasranh four (4), enticlod "Compensocton"' to provsde for ehe authortiation of a ono-cina, lum mun nymans in the ount of fi. 400. Ml other rore ind condieton of the contract, on amendod, remain ta Pull force and effeet. TINTIN e mớ do ho BE spocial Contract tas Officor - HITERNAL USE ONLY 1-30-78 --- ## Page 26 SECRET 20 858 C1 659-77 MEMORANDUM FORE: FROM; THROUGH SUBJECT. Chief, Contract Personnel Division Bo Hugh Tovar Chief, Counterintelligence Staff Chief arce: Manpover see Manage Branch/c Branch/Contraet Contract Amendment to Action Requested: Mats requested that the contract for 7. an. Theependent amended. eftectivo. as of: 1 January, 3978 Contracto'' 550.00 per month for the use of his private to pay him living quarters as an office: "It is atso requested that contract be amended to include the interest payments on a car that he purchased so that he could be ready and available for work when we request him. i. Background: Khen CI Staff assuned responsibility for In July 1076, we noted that the Office of Security had an inforant arrangement by which it reimbursed 1$50. 00 per month for the use of his private quarters as office space. arrangement be incorporated its now requested that this Icontract. On? February 1977 former Chief Cl Stuff agreed to reimburse for the interest payments on a car which he purchased so that he would be ready and available for work when we needed hin; The months interest charge as of December 197% is slightly less than $39.00 and it is . EZ IMPDET CL BY 012209 SECRET --- ## Page 27 SECRET cxpocted to. decline.stcadily .as tho unputd. balance ls amortised over tho next to years therefore, requested that I contract be amendou to also include this payment All other terms and conditiong of said contract, as amended, remain in full force and effect lugh Tovar CONCUR: C/CMS/MSB/C* 2 3 DEC 197:7 Dat'c 2 SECRET --- ## Page 28 4-00000 S ECRET C1 031-78 MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM THROUGH : SUBJECT Chief, Contract Personnel Division Hugh Tovar Chief, Counterintelligence Staff- Chief, Career Management Staff Manpower and Support Branch/Contract contract Anendment, Bruce A. PENTOTALLY ON Action Requested: is requested that the contract for Bruce BERTOTALLY, an Independent. Contractor..e amonded retroactive to 1 June 1977 deloting the last sentence of paragraph 3j concerning the taxability of operational travel by his wife, of a previous amendment effective i June 1977. It is further requested that a one-time, payment of $1: 404 to BERTOTALLY be authorized to offset the tax he is required to pay on the $3,100 which represents his wife's travel expenses on their last operational trip abroad, which appcared on BERTOTALLY's W-? form for 1977 as additional taxable income. for BERTOTALEE On July 1996, After CI Staff assumed responsibility. based on requirements develoved by the field, he was asked if he would be willing to under- take occasional operational irios abroad BERTOTALLY agreed, but was adamant that he would only do so if the Ageney would allow his wife to accompany him not only for purposes of companion ship but also. to enhance his security; condition to such overscas operational travel and because i was felt het presence would contribute to his good morale, effectiveness in the porformance of his mission, and also preclude his possibly creating potentially embarrassing incidents for us and the host fiaison services; Chief, E2 IMPDET CL BY 012208 SECRET --- ## Page 29 SECRET C/ Staff made a personal commitment to BERTOTALLY. that he could indeed have his wife accompany. him on any operational trips abroad, if he chose to have her do so, and that her travel expenses would be borne by the Agency. It was understood that her travel expenses would be Timited to the cost of her travel and. per diem.: subsequent to this agreement Bertotally took three separate:trips abroad accompanied. by his wife No proprems Terrors he rouchers. submitted trip, cinning neit ointycosts as operationat. thoir last joint trip abroad her travch expenses of 3/100 wore interpreted as additional taxable income. BERTOMDE considers this a violation of the commitment made to him and has demanded that the Agency pay hin a sum equivalent to thc additional Federal and state taxes he will have to pay as a result of our unilateral decision on this matter. Presently he already have three separate trips abroad planned for BERTOTALLY during 1978.. We are convinced that unless we reimburse him for the $1,404 additional tax he must pay for 1977 and assure him that his wife can accompany him on future operational trips abroad at Agency expense and without having such expenses. declared as' additional in- come, he will refuse to go on any more trips abroad on our behalf. A11 other terms and conditions of the contract remain in full force and effect. 3tugh awar Hagh Toyal CONCUR: C/ CMS/MSB/ C 26 Jan 78 SECRET --- ## Page 30 14-00000 SECRET Mr. Bruce A. Bortotally Dear Mr. Bartotally: Reference is made to vour contract with the United States Governsent, ne represented by the Contracting Officer, affective 1 March 1970, ae amended. Effactive 9 October 1977 paragraph four entitled "Couponsation" 18 i led by tole the the rous 2: 09ald a paro the did bosurg provide that mibsequent austentaiion of your basic fèe, baned upon cont-of-living Increnses; will be Individually authorised by contract mendrant at appropriace. ¿then no requested and cortilled by the rosponsible Covernment offlesal. All ócher coris and conditions of the contract, as amended, remalmi In full force and effect. UNITED STATES GOVERNMEN EZIMPDET CI. by: 063837 ACBINgG 1-13-78 --- ## Page 31 SECRET 5 %: CI. 001-78 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Personnel ATTENTION: Chief, Contract Personnel Division FROM B. hiel. counterintelagence. stat THROUGH Chief, Carcer Management Star Manpower and Support Branch/Contracts SUBJECT Contract Amendment for Action Reuvested: It is requested. that the contract for an Independent Contractor, be amended retroacurve to. 9. October 1977 to increase his compensation from $33,000 per annum to $35,327. This tepre- sents a.cost of living increaso of 7.05 per cent. (It is further requested that a clause be included in contract to the effect that he is entitled to the equivalent of any future cost-of-living increases granted to Agency employees.) in 2. Background: was recruited by the Agency. switzerland in I96Z and promised $25,000 per year while working as an agent in place. • He later defceted to this • country: In July 1976 responsibility for him was transferred from the Office of Security to be of great assistance to this Staff as to the Cl Staff and he continues well as the Fbi. E2 IMPDET CL BY 012208 SECRET --- ## Page 32 SECRET The remuneration that he recrives from the Agency is his He was given cost-of-living to receive such increases in the future. December 1977 he inquired why his pay did not already roflect 7.05 per cent increase given to Agency employees in October. Ne believe it to be in the best interests of the US Government to honor all commitments made to him and to assure that he continues to identify himself posttivoly with the Agency. All other terms and condicions amended, remain In full force: and of said contract, as effect. BALA Tovar CONCUR: C/CMS/MSB/C 9 dar 27 Date. 2 SECRET --- ## Page 33 SECRET 14 November: 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chlef, Contract Personnel Diviston FROM. Chief, PCS/CSS/B8F SUBJECT RÉFERENCE Contract Amendment - Bruce A: BERTOTALLY (P) Our Memorandum of 29 June 1979 Our Memorandum of: 28- September 1971 In regards to referenced memorandums, we were telephonteally adutsed by your office that subject's contract was being amended to provide that the travel expenses of subject's wife represented taxable compensation: As we are nearing the end of the tax year, It would be apprectated if the amendment could be provided in the near future in order that these payments can be included in sub- ject's earring's statements. Thanks. SECRET E2 IMPDET CL BY 061922 --- ## Page 34 14-00000 SECRET 29 June 1977 MENORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division FROM Chiof, PCS/CSS/B6R SUBJECT Contract Amendment - Bruce A. BERTOTALLY No are in receipt of a copy of subject contract amondment dated 27 June 1977 To administer the conditions of this améndment, thero are two questions which come to mind: a . The amendment provides. that travol of subject's dependent wife may ho authorized "when it is determined by the responsible Governmont official that such travel will support and best serve operational interests and objectivòs." Under the provisions of lk e0 (18) now in the process of amendment), TDY truvel, for dependents of an employee must be approved by a Deputy Director. Further, under the OGC ruling 77-1204, ThY travel for a dependont "should not be authorized, save the Doputy Director's discretion. It should be changed to preclude any possible interpretation of which would give rise to the junkets for wives and depen dents at Government expense While it is recognized is in fact an Indopendent Contractor, the entire subject of dependents roY travel is a delicate issue, and because of this, we ask that your office identify the level of the "responsible Government official" who must approve the operational necessity travel of subject's wife. SECRET --- ## Page 35 SECRET b. Query.. if the TDY travel of subject's wife is in fact properly approved, not as an opérational. necessity, but for matters "essential to her health" do these payments in fact become taxablé income: The regulations define an Independent Contractor as a self-employed individual who nay be paid a fee for certain services of products, and generally contracts provide for reimbursement for necessary operational expenses: We have no difficulty in certifying the wite 's travel when it can be classified as antoperational necessity However, as both references provide authority only to dependent operational this also gives rise as: to what level of authority is roquired to authorize travel for a- dependent wife to accompany hor husband on a TDY. trip was a matter essential to her health." It 1s requested that we be advised of the level of the "resonsible. Government official" who can approve such travel Further ag: subject's contract draws a line between the opefational necessity travel and that travel essential to hor healoh, we would appreciate boing advised if the non-operational travel paynents for subject's wife represents taxable in- come. PCS/CSS/ BEF, Distribution: Oriz. 4. 1 - C/Contract Personnel Division SECRET - 2- --- ## Page 36 14-00000 come SECRET 28 September 1977 MENORANDUM FOR: Chef, Contract Personnel Division FRON Chtet, Pes/EsS/B&F SUBJECT: REFERENCE Contract Amendment - Bruce A. BERTOTALLY (S): Our Memorandum of 29 June 1977 A response to our referenced memorandum (copy attached) would be appreclated. 28 September 1.977 PCS/ESS/BRF/ Distridution: Orig• CPD B2F files SECRET E2 IMPDET EL BY 061922 --- ## Page 37 ні, акад ри 67-8. T Opt..1977 Ar of thile date a fuid each har been made of GiD for she eabou: - of rubject, rile. Our rerords indirate that 1i sar charged out tol Jin July probably in refertare to ruertion ral-et by on dependent travel. He has rearched and hir pery har searched oGe with no marrerr. Ori 6.0ct and undersigned met. with t91+ that in erna to hil westion re approval authority for travel Suet CI Ke to covered pnint * to 'ravel of ou independent son actor. In ronformence and indi Indirated arceptance of the -tuation: with Govt rule: and Reg. --- ## Page 38 Rr. Bruce A. Bertotally Dear Ar. Bertotally: Reference is made to your contract with the lpited States Government, as represented by the Contracting Officer, effective 1 March 1970.. Effective 1 June 1977 paragraph five (5) entitled "Allerances, Travel and other Expenses" is amended by expandire Its scope to authorize the concurrent. voluntary, travel of your dependent wife, Including the appropriate rate of per diem. when 1t Is determined by the responsible Government official that such travel will support and best serve operational Interests and oblectlves. The extent and destinations of such dependent travel will be as restonated and defined by such official and, when in the course of such travel it is determined as a matter of operational necessity or as a matter essential to her health and well being that she remain at some particular place in the course of such. travel while you continue on to specifie geographical locations in fulftllment of operational missions, continuation of, her pen diem will be authorized for such perlods. Al) montes. advanced or reimbursed you hereunder by the Governs ment and for the purposes herefo Indicated are determined to be additional income to you and as such considered to be taxable for federal Incone tax purposes: It is also understood and agreed by all concerned, and 1s herein so. the tens of this agreement. Government neither Inters or assumes any Mability of, whatsoever nature concerning her health and well boingate she frooly clocts to undertake; such: Al other terms and conditions of the contract, as amended, remain in full force and effect: • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 10/ BY Contracting Officer E2 IMPDET * CL BY: 063837 2S.00 10/17/77 --- ## Page 39 Seene! 17 October 1977 MEHORANDUM FOR: Chief PCS/CSS/B&F FROM: SUBJECT REFERENCE DC/CPD: : Contract amended Bruce A. BERTOTALLY Your memorandum, sublect as above, dated 29 June 1977 Your referenced memorandum catsed two basic questions in regar to an amendment effected to the contract of Bruce Bertotally. .To. determine the answers a meeting was held:6. October 1977 with discuss on and deciston by those present: ISSADDA John Rizzo for. the General. Counsel and for CPD: In subparagraph (a) öf your memorandum you requested identification of the level of the responstole Government offictal who must approve the operational necessity travel of subject's wife.. The Chief Cl Stafe was so Identified. Subparagraph (b) basically related to the taxability or non taxability o9, funds made available and relating to the dependent wife's travel. was the consensus and agreement of all present that all such funds should be considered as additional compensation and taxable. E2IMPDET CL BY: --- ## Page 40 14-00000 SECRET 28 September 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Dirtston FROM Chief, PCS/CSS/B&F SÜBJECT. REFERENCE Contract Amendment - Bruce A. BERTOTALLY (S) Our Memorandum of 29 June 1977 A response to our referenced memorandum (copy attached) would be appreciated. 28 September 1977 PCS/CSS/B&FA SECRET E2 IMPDET CL BY 061922 --- ## Page 41 SECRET :29 June 1977 NEMORANDUM FOR: Chivf, Contract Porsonnol Division FROM Chief, PCS/CSS/BGF SUBJECT Contract Amendment - Bruce A. BERTOTALLY 1. We are in reccipt of a copy of subject contract amendment dated 27 June 1977 To administer the conditions of this amendment, there are two questions which come The, amendment provides. that travel of subject's dependent wife may be authorized "when it is dotermined by the responsible Government official that such travel will support ánd best serve operational interests and objectives.". Under the provisions of HIR 22-2a (18) (now in the process of amendment), TDY travel for dependents of an employee must be Further, travel for a depéndent "should not be authorized, save the Deputy Director's discretion. It should be changed to preclude any possible interpretation of which would give rise to TDY junkets for wives and depen- dents at Governmen't expense." While it is iccognized that subject is in fact an Independent Contractor, the entire subject of dependents To travel is a delicate issue, and because your office udentity the leved of the responsib "responsible: Government official"! who must approve the operational necessity travel of subject's wife. SECRET --- ## Page 42 1d-0d0d b. Query, if the TDY travel of subject's wife is in fact properly approved, not as an operational necessity, but for matters "essential to her health" do these payments in fact become taxable income. The regulations define an Independent Contractor as. &:: self-employed individual who may be paid a fee for certain services or.products, and generally contracts provide for reimbursement for necessary operational expenses We have no difficulty in certifying the wife's travel when it can be Classified as an operational necessity. However, as both references provide authority only to Deputy Directors to approve dependent operational this also gives rise as to what level of authority is required to muchorize travel for a dependent kito to accompany her husband on a TDY. trip "as a matter " It is requested that we be the resonsible Government official"' who can approve such travel. Further; as subject's contract draws a line between the opérationat necessity travel and that travol essentral to her health, ve would appreciato being advised: if the.non-operational travel payments for subject's wife represents taxable in- come.. PCS/CSS/B&F Distribution: Orig. & 1 - C/Contract Personnel Division SECRET 2 3. LIMEDET CL Br261922 --- ## Page 43 22 more Ct 575-77 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division FROM B• Hugh Tovar Chiof, Countorintelligence Staff SUBJECT Action Roquested: It is requested that paragraph five. (59 crititlod "Allovances, Travel and other expenses of BrucoA. BERTOTALLy's contrace dated) I March 1970- as amended, be furthor, amended offective I Jue 1977 to permit his wife to accompany him on travel abroad. 2. Background: As in indopendent contractor Bruce A. BERTOTALLY'S concract makos no provision for his wife to accompany him when traveling abroad at our request. . This amendment will make such travel possible when at the option and dircction of the Contral Intclligence Agency it is believed that such travel wlll materially inprové his cover and security and substantially contribute to the performance of his mission. The rcquested change in paragraph five (5) should in no way obligato BERTOTALLY's wife to accompany her husband on travel abroad nor does it assume su). liability if she frecly clects to mako such travel. All other torms and conditions" of the contract remain in full force and effect. Sing: Kuan TaiCoy B. EZ INPDET CL. BY 019359 SECRET --- ## Page 44 SECRET 064510 20/12755.93 Mr. Bruce A. Bertotally Dont Hs, Bertorallys Referance lo nado to your contract with the Untted States Covernment, da roprosinted by the Contracting Officer, effectivall March 1970. Pilactiro 1 June 1977 paragraya five (5) rutitlad "Allovencos, Traval and other ispensos" in anended by expanding ice acopa to suthorite the concurrent, voluntary, traval of your depeniont wife, tacluding the approptinto rate of per dien, then 1t la dateralned by tha responalblo Covernment officlas that such travel vill nupport and best sorva operational Intereats and obeetya. The extend and destination of puch dependent travel u1ll be a dantenated and defined by nich official md, whea to tha course of such travel it la deterioed is i mattor of operationil noceanity or du a nactor nonstal to but bealth and vol botag that aba renola it don particular placo to the course of such travl vile you contire on to pictite geosraph,ca, Location in lulfilmut of operation astone; continuncion of bar per din mit be nichorted for such pertodo. All other torna and conditions of the contract, so amcaded, rematr to full force and affect, UNITED STATES COVERINEN 18/ Contracting Officer ELLIPDET Ci: by: 063837 SECRET --- ## Page 45 14-00000 SECRET Mr. Bruce A: Bertotally Dear Mr. Bertotallys Roference is mado to your contract with the United Statos Government, as reprosented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective l March 1970. Effective 1 March 1975, said contract is amended by revising the first sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation"' to read as follows: "You will be compensated by the Centräl Intelligence Agency at the rate of twenty-five thousand, two hundred filty dollars ($25, 250) per year." All other terms and conditions of the contract remain in full force and effect. CENTRAL JNTELLIGENGE AGENCY Spicial Contracting Olficer CEPTED: Bruce WITNESS: Bertotally APPROVED: LICROFILVED GULY ELIMPDET CL by: 063837 SECRET --- ## Page 46 1d-0d0d Dear! Reference is made to your contract with the United States Jovernment effective i March 1970. as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, Effective I Narch 1976, said contract is amended by revising tho first sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" read as follows: "You will be compensated by the Central Intelligence Agency at the rate of Twenty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Thirteen Dollars ($26,513) per yéar." A1l other terms and conditions of said contract remain in full force and iffect.. Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below. CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY BY Spectal Contractin OFFICEr ACCEPTED: Apr: 6 8, 1976 Date WITNESS: Bene Isile APPROVED: 220l,26 certlled to be a true copy of the sigred original which is on fle in the office of Security"' Chief, Eudget and Fiscal trach Office of Security MICROF ILMED JULY 1977 SECRET --- ## Page 47 AOMNESRATVE INTERSAL USE CNIY Nr. Bruce A.. BERTOTALLY Dear Mr. Bertotally: Reference is sade to your contrace with the Taiced States Goverment, an represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 191o, As amended. Effective 1 October 1976, said contract 19 amended by revising the ffrst sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" to read as follows: "You will be compensated by the Central Intelligence Agency at the rate of Twenty-Eight Thousand lae Hundred and Three dollars ($29,103.00) per year," All other terms and conditions of sald contract, as amended remain in full force and effect. Please achowledge by itguins la the space provided belor. CENTRAL. INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 1209. spectal Contracing officer •ACCEPTED: /s/ Bruce A. BERTOTALLY dont act Personnol D1718103 Detober: 12. 1976 Date WITNESS: Gellu0/976 APPROVED: MICRCEILWED JULY 1977 Date. Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is file in Ct Staff. BITERNAL BSE ONLY 7 19h6 Personnel Orficer CI Staff --- ## Page 48 ACMISTRATIKE INTERNAL ERE ONLY Мг. Bruce A. BERTOTALLY Dear Mr. Bertotally: keference is made to your contract with the United States Government, as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 1970. Effective 1 December 1976 said contract is amended by deleting the figures $12.50 and $603.52 as they appear in subparagraph (n) of parngraph 81x (G) entitled "Negotiated Benefits" and by substituting in lieu thereof the figures All other terms and conditions of the contract remain in full force and effect. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Special Contracting Officer. ACCEPTED: /sl- Bruce A: BERTOTALLY WITNESS: 9. Du 14,76 APPROVEP: Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is in CI Staff: 12/14/16 Porsonned officer MICROFILMED JULY and a de 1973 AOMHSTMATIVE TARMEN USE ONLY Read 12115146. --- ## Page 49 1d-0d0 Bruce A. BLKTOTN.LY -Dear Mr. BERTOTALLY Reference is made to your contract with the United States Coverinal. as reprevented by the Contracting Officer, effcctive l March 1970, as amended. Effective 16 February 1977 paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensati 1s amended by authorizing you a one-time, lump sun, taxable payment la the amount of $2,100. All other terms and conditions of the contract, as amended, female In full force and effect. UNITED STATES COVERNHENT BY Certified I to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in CI Staff. MICROF ILN ED •4966 Personned Officer 23 Fibuke, 1777. • ASMNSTRATSE BITE 22 ISE ONLY - --- ## Page 50 14-00000 ABENSTRATRE INTEREAL DOS CUTY Bruce A. BEKTOTALLY Deur Mr. BERTOTALLY Reference is ande to your contract with the United States Government, as represented by the Central Intolligence Agency, effective 1 Narch 1970, as amended. iffective 1 March 197%, said contract in anended by revising the first sencence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" to read as follows: "You.will be compensated by the Central Intelligence Agency at the of Thirty-three shousand dollars. ($33,000) per year." A1l other teres and conditions of sald contract, as anended renata in full force and effect. Please acknowledge by slining in the space provided below. Ослабу Spectal Contracting officer ACCEPTED: Way 3,1927. Date WETNESS: 1977 APPROVED: MICROFILMED Date Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in CI Staff. AOMINICTRATITE Persónnel Officer INTERNAL USE ONLY --- ## Page 51 Mr: BrUCe A, BERTOTALLY DA! ¡Dear Mr. Bertotally:. Reference is made lo your contract with the United Statee Government, as ropiesentrol by flie Gentral Inielligence Agenes, effretive l March 1970. Effective | March 1973 said contract is amended by revising the firat sentence of paragraph four (%) entitled "Comprasation" lo read is •follows: You will be compensated by the Central Intelligence Agcncy at the rate of Twenty-Two Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($22, 250) per year." All other terms and conditions of said contract remain in full force and effect. Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT As Represented by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY By: ouncer ACCEPTED: 18/ Bruce. 1. DERTOTALLY WITNESS: 1s/ Bruce I Solie Date: 142201 16, 8023 Date: 16 March 1973 Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in the Office. of Security.: 20/345 Chief, Budget and Fiscal Branch Office of Security STORET EZIMPDET CLby: 026715 --- ## Page 52 Мг. Bruce A. BERTOTALLY 064.010 Dear Mr. BERTOTALLY: 20/71 Reference is made to your contract with the United States Government, as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, cilectivo l March 1970. Ellective l March 1974, said contract is amonded by revising the firut sentence of paragraph four (4) entilled "Compensation" to read as follows: "You will be compensated by the Central Intelligence Agency at tho rate of Twenty-Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollara ($23;750) per year. " All other terms and conditions of said contract remaln in full force and effect. Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below.. CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY M 1/75 ACCEPTED: /s/ Bruce A. BERTOTALLY kirip 9, 1974 Date WITNESS: 99/na11474 Date APPROVED: Vị Min) Date Certified to bea true copy of the signed original which. is.op file in the Office of Security: ELIMPDET CL by: 063837 Chief, Budget and Fiscal Branch Oftice of Security SEGSET --- ## Page 53 14-00000 RONOUNO COMPONINT BETONALER. Druce A. CASA OFFICER Doden on Security 3K2 Bruce lo Solle PERSONAL DATA PRECTIVA DATI CURRINT RCS POST Independent Contractor 1.1 March 1969 PUTURI ROS POST (ACTIO DATO) Washioston, D. C. AILATIONI# BRATE CA DIRTH CITZENIAN Nº 10392 EA TERMO 7682 F0. 9126 Allen DATE OF BERTI RESICA WITH SUANET, I NOT. MITRE I SPOUSE UNDER CONTRACI CR DIMONO DY MOTACT APICTIVA DATI DE COVEA COVER DATA YA$ I VES, PROVIDI PUDONYM ¡TRONELO BY COM NONONCIL COVER РАСРАНТАМУ TEs. Divido CONDA PACITY CATTICATO ALLONANCE PAY, PRANOO USO aY Covie MEE OF TAR:DDO VENTATION TO IN USURD AY COVER 117. 18: 811 WOFACT DATA. PAYMINT OR CONIPINSATiON: HEADQUARTERS INGOLD DEVISED PACAITY ACCOUNT FICA WORACT TO MPORT DEVISED "PACIÜTY 1099 DIVISIO PACHITY #' SUESET I UNDIR MONOPACIAL COVER CONSUITATION VITH THE COVIAT TAX COMMITILE IS MIONIRIO A TAX-ASCESCAINI Not Applicable IWAL SiOT AS SUONID OY THE COVEAT TAX COMMITTE COMMENTE #Prior to preparing Fora, calll x5345, for addrens "Incone aud social security taxes will bo vithheld. O/SEx wiri handle Ililog of stato estimated tax returns. APPROVAL DATA • 313 a usi prinay toriors AUTHENNICATICON DATE SIGNATURE ALSINSILE DIFICI 6/25/69 Bune Pole Bruce I. Solte LE ORRE TO ONICE DI PALANTE, CON TO CENTRA COVIN COPY TO PRE SECRET SECRET NOTE: DETACH:THIS PORTION OF FORM AND DISTRIBUTE SEPARATELY SOCLAL SECUAITY NO. HOT SCIANO ACCONTA CONIATO O MONOE NORANDE 5T7-74-5127 ADDAIIS OE RECORD UN UAY ADORESS (Ferrga) * Bee above FOX 313A USE PREVIOUS EOMONS DISTRIBUITION- SICHED ORE TO OSAICE DE EDMAVÉE, CORY TO CENTRAL COVIA, COAY TO PRE SECRET N° 10392 JUSEY SOCIAL LICUITY NO --- ## Page 54 Empl A 064010 Per your request, the following de. a breakdown of additional retroactive salary for the perlod 1 March -J1 May 1977. This will be Included with normal salary check for the month of June. Cross 1,224.27 Fica $20.40 Fedtax 401.10 SEx 85.4046 Net 717.33 Gros 2,750.00 New normal salary effective 1-30 June 1977 1s as follow,. Fica Tedtax 608.07 _Stx 170.00 Hosp 18.75 *Pien Max reached for tax year; Stopped offective. 1. June 1977 Met 1953.10 MICROFILMED. --- ## Page 55 REPLY-REGRETTED SPEED LETTER YES LETTEN _day 1925 T0 : Chiof, C&TD/OF FROM: OS/B&F 4E71 Hqs TIN: Special PayrOll Ops SUBJECT: Bruce A. BERTOTALLY 1064010 - Independent Contractor Attached is an amendment to Subject's contract increasing has compensation from $23,750 to $25.750 per annum effective 1 March 1975, Withholding. of _state tax should be increased from S125 tors130 per month concurrent with the offective date of this amondment. I trust it is not too jate to include the increase plus adjustment for March with hiss April pay: Your assistance: is appreciated as alvays: SNATURE REPLY O416 HETURN TO ORIGINATOR 1838 USE PRETION% SEITIONS. --- ## Page 56 Bruce A. BERTOTALLY Mr. BERTOTALLY (P) 1S! ruce JULY 197I --- ## Page 57 SECHET Mr. Bruce A. BERTOTALLY (P) Dear Mr. BERTOTALLY: Reference is made to your contract with the United States Government, as represented by the Central Intolligence Agency, effective l March 1970. Effective l March 1971 said contract is amended by revising the first sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" to read as follows:: "You will be compensatod by the Central Intelligence Agency at the rate of Nineteen Thousand Five Huidred Dollars (19, 500.00) per year." All other terms and conditions of said contract remain in full force and effect. Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT DOC MICRO, SER. As Represented by: the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY By: MICROFILMED Contracting Öfficer ACCEPTED: /S/ Bruce A. BER TÖTALLY WITNESS: ist Bruce L. Solie. Date: 12 February 1971 Date: 12 February 1971 Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in the Office of Security. ivisti Chief, SEGIST Budget and Fiscal Branch Orrect security 23546 man manade CaW796-10% 291 Cátaclesias --- ## Page 58 Me. Bruco A. BERTOTALLY. S021 Dear. Mr. Bertotally: Reference is made to your contract with the United States Government; as sopresented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective l March 1970, as amended. Effective I March 1972 said contract, as amended, is further amended as set forth below: "(a) The first sentence of paragraph four (4) entitled "COM- PENSATION" is revised to read as followa: "You will be compensatod by the CIA at the rato of Twenty-one Thousand Dollars ($21, 000) per ycar." (b) Sub-paragraph (a) of paragraph six (6) entitled "'NEGOTIATED BENEFITS" is deleted, and in lieu thereof the following is substituted: "6(a): You presently have a private health insurance plan for yourself and your wife. It is understood and agreed that you will bear a portion of the total premium cost of said plan; this organization will bear the remainder. Your portion Is herein established at $12. 50 por month and will be deducted from contractual paymente due you. The total annual premium coat of said plan lo presently $603.52. If required, the. Government's portion may be paid yearly, in advance." All other terms and conditions of said contract, as amended, remain in full force and effect. Please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT As Represented by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY By: Contracting Officer ACCEPTED: /S/ Bruce A. BERTOTALLY " Date: Fe Barn 201, 192$ WITNESS: /S/ Bruce. L. Solic Date: Fcbruary 29, 1972 Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in the Office of Security. DOC. MICRO. SER. an miner MICROFILMED Chiel, Budgek and Fiscal Branch Office of Security --- ## Page 59 SECRET MP. Bruce A. BERTOTALLY (P) Deaf MY. BERTOTALLY: Reference la made to your contract with the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, as soprevented by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. effective l March 1969. Eflective ! March 1970 said contract is herein terminated by mutual convent of the parties thereto, and In lieu thereof the following agreement la substituted. The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, as represented by the CENTRAL INTELLGENCE AGENCY, hereby contracts with you under the following forma and conditions: L. STATUS: Your legal atatus under thia contract la that of an Independent contractor or consullible You are not considered an employe of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT by virtue of thie contract. You will be required to boid yourself vallablo at all times to fall requente made of you by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY or to repond te tasks roguented of you by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. BER cologist oher leful employment on occupation mot -APPO Instructto hereaf bath colved from the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY bed to you pur oant to tito contrace and within the torn i blades upon you soft lncluded in the written torme COMMUNCATON Inclid lion hips with the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY you will accept requests, tasks and relevant instrucilons from an individual hereloatter referred to au the "Authorized. Government Represent live. " Ho will be fully nuthorized to discues mattors with you relating to your responsibillties under this contract including, bat not limitod to, cover arrangements, place of asalgement. conditions of work or any other mattere relating to your relatlonablp with. the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.. COVER AND SECUKITY. In the performance of your responsibilities hereunder, apropriate arrangements will be made. regarding, cover and goneral security conditione: you may be reguired to executo certala documents in the course of'ostabitshing cover arrangements but it ls to be expressly uoderstood that such documents are solely for the purpose of cover and security and confer no additional logal righta or obligationa and that all of your rights and obligations with respect to the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY derive solely from this agreement. In connection with cover and decurity you will be provided from time to time speckfic instructions by the Authorlzed Government Representative and you will be required to adhere precltely to such instructions MICROFILMED DOC. MICRO. SER: SECRET, qura;radag and --- ## Page 60 1 to the bal did d COSIPENSATION.: You will be compensated by the CENTANL INTELLICENCS AGENCY at the rate of Elgiteen Thousad Elve Hundred: Dollars ($19:502. 00f per year.. Pryient of this compensation shall be monthly in accordance with arrangements acceptable to the Authoried Coverament Sepresent stlve. The sum is subject to Federal locome taxea and to such'locome tax lawa no are splicable to your place of residence. Additionally, ebla compongation do subject to FICA faxes. The current rates and method of payment will be in accordance with applicable laws and the security instructione lasued by the Authorized Government Representative. Paynent of all faxes and preparallon of neceusary tax returns are your persond obligation and responsibility but in accord with approprate security Instructions which will be furniahed by the Authorized Goverment Representative. 5- ALLOWANCES, DAVEL AND OTHER EXPENSES. I, la the course of fulles your co pond butties under thip asceement. monetary llowancen dunder general UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT rules and rogulationd, you will be paid ouch monetary Nowanese ta subatantial accordance with those lawn and regulatione. it, in the courbe of this congree, you ra directed to travel or aro wuthorized to lacur other of s0ed, salmbur oment for e penies wilbe made by to CENTRAL IN TELLICENCE AGENCY Cubatanstil accordance MS apPuCablo CENTRAL NTELLIGENCE NGENCY cosulations 6. NEGOTIATED DE You presentis have o private boatth laour ace plan for yourdels and your wito patd until late Decembet 1970., Prior to the expiration dato of the current policy the CENTRAL, INTELLIGENCE AGENCY has the option of prying premlure on the current polley untll I March 1972 or enrolling you in a: hoalth Insurance program for selected contract ladividunle of the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY subject to all the terms and conditions of that program. The CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY will pay the premium on elther Insurance coverago undit i March i9T2. However, any now contract wilt include an appropriate clause providing that tois orsenisation will bear a portion of the fotal premlum cont of any health insurance and you will bear the remaledor. The CENTRAL INTCLLIGENCE AGENCY will endeavor to arrange for you to secure a term We induranco policy with a face value of $15, 000. 00: This policy contals no additional accidental death bengfita. The premiums for the policy wr be your personal responstbility. The current premium charge to $12. 00 per month. MICROFILMED !!'L: ^ 1478 DOC. MICRO, SER. SECRET: g9 01. 37 23 --- ## Page 61 14-00000 ci (!) Subjoce to the prioritles of work you are heroin guthorkzed twenty-one. (21) work daya vacation with. Phy per contract year to be taken only at times and places approved. Lo advance by the Authorlaed Government Representative: Vacation time la not accruable and will nos be carpled over from year to year. Payment for unused vacation time will not be authorized. (2) If Incappeltated for work due to illness, injury and the like, your compensatlon may be contiaued for periods not to exceed a total of thirteen (13) working days por contract year. Poriods of abaence in excaja of three (3) Consecutive days will require a doctor'a certiíicate. dike vacatloo.time this benelit in not accruablé and will not be carrled over from year to year. • Cash payment in lleu of this beneflt will not bo authorized. SECRECT OBLIGATION. You will be required to keep forever secret this agreement and all Information which you may obtata by reason hereot (unles; releaned in writes by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY (rom much obligation). With full knowledge that violation of sueb. secrecy may hubject you to enmiant. prosecutton undor she coptonage lam Cod other appliesble Your relationabl CENTRAL INELLIGRNCE ACENCY Cad she contract meet bo and you my nos disco any hopest ot this rolationablp and contra Repres yes Astherland Governmen на от quet othee person a he may epectically epproves. BS UNAUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS: No promlace: on: commitments portating to righte, privileges, of benefits other than thones expresoly stipulated in writtog ta this agreement or aby amendment thereto whall be binding on the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. TERM. This agreement la effective ad of! March 1970 and shall bo for a term of two (2) yearte At the end of that period thie contract shall be deemed to be ronowed for another year unlous novleered termination has been furniahed to you thirty (39) days to adyance. Thereafter the contrnct will be renewed automatically on similar terme and conditions. This contrast may be termlented at any time by either party upon furalahlog thirty (30) days advance notice. Upon termination ot thie contract or ronewato thoroot, including amendments, lf any. the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY will undertake to basiat you la obtalatos galaful employment or to provide continuiat Compensation to. asture you that you will be abte to malotain a reasonable standard of liviog: This undertaklog la contlagent upon your futilillay the terma of SECRET MICROFiLMED il-n 1970 DOC. MICRO, SER. Essets-ren salaear. dgasgrstrno.22g --- ## Page 62 the contract und the continuing compllance with the gecticy obliautton Imposed on you by paragraph 7of hia contrace and the grovelone or 60 recrecy agreement which you have signed with the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY UNITED STATES COVEKNMENT As Reprerented by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY В уз /B/ Contractloan Offleer Dates 6 March 1970 ACCEPTED: US/. BrUCO A BERTOTA WITNESS Brúc 6 MI Certified to be& true copy of the signed original which is on file in the Once of Security. 19 Mati Chiel, Budget and Fiscal Branch Office of Security. MICROFILMEO "! =n 1970. DOC. MICRO. SER. SECRET Echend try calroat 497.3777 741 --- ## Page 63 BrucE A. BERTOTALLY (P) Dear Mi. BERTOTALLY.. The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, as represenied by the CENTRIL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, hereby contracts with you under the following torme and condidlone: 1. STATUS: Your legal atatus under thilo contract la that of an Independent contractor os consuliant. You ure not conuldered an employee of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT-by vrtue of thie contench You will be raquited to hold yourselt aralable at all times to titti gene trade of fouby he CENTRAL INTELLICENCE AGENCY on to reapond to tooke requented of you by o CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE. ACENCE Tou will retral from onsastes te other salati omploym or occupation unill approvat bae boon recolved from the CENTRAL. INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Instructions furnished to you pursuant to the contract and witals the terma hereof shall be ae binding upon you an lt tacluded ln the written terma herrof. ? COMMUNICATION. In all relationahips with the CENTRAL INTELLICINCE AGENCY you will accept requiete, taske and relevant instructions from an individual herotaatier referred to as the "Authorised Goyerni ment Reprodentatives" He Wilr Do fully author tzed to discuse mattere wier you rolating to your responsibilities undor cale contract Includiag. but not limited to, covor arrangemente, place of assigament, conditions of work or any other matters relating to your relationship with the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. 3. COVER AND SECURITY. ' in the parformance of your responsibilittes hereunder, appropriate arrangementa will be made. regarding cover and general security conditions. You may be required MICROFILMEO 12933-71979 DOC. MICRO. SER --- ## Page 64 to execute certal document. in the course of establishing cover arrangements but lt la to be'expresly sderstood that auch documente are solely for the purpose of cover and security and confor no additional logal righta or obligations and that all al your rights and obligations with respect to the CENTRAL INTELLIGLICI AGENCY derive solely from this agreemont. In connection with comes end security you will be providod iron time to time specile inviractions by the Authortsed Govornment Ropresentitive and you inal to required to adhere precionly to such inétructione. 4, COMPENSATION, You Wait be composited by the CENTRAl INGELLUGENCE AGENCT be the rate of Sharge Thousand Five Madred pollar sto S00: 001 per Reynges of elle compensation chall be. monthly lo accordance with arrangen acceptable to the Authorited Government Representative, Thie gam la aubject to Federsi lacome taros and to vuch income tax laws ad are applicabla to your place of reeldence. Additionally, this compencation to subject to FICA laxes. The current rates and method of payment sail be la accordanco with applicable lawe and the security instructions lasted by the Authörized Government Roprecentadve, To assles you in establlahing yoursell, the CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY will aBslot you in procurlos an automobile and necessary honschold fees sturge, providing lunds therefor, up to a maximum of Light Thougand Dotary (58: 000. 00% Payment of all taxes and preparation of necessa your personal obligation and responsibility but in accord with appropriate securtly Intructions which will be furlebed by the Authorized Government Ropresentative. MICROFILMED DOC. MICRO. SER --- ## Page 65 14-000n 5. PLACE DE RESIDENCE. la the intereits of security, you will. be required lo live in such State, ares, and houne or apartment as in opecifically approved by the CENTUAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY after mutual discunion and due consideration of all circumstances. All of tho expenses of such loased house or apartment will be borne by you and the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY will not be obligated to pay any such éxpense 6. ALLOWANGES, TRAVEL AND OTHER EXPENSES. Is, In the courge of fulliuling your responsibilities mader this agreement, monetary allowances would be payable under general UNITED STATES COVERNMENT rules and regulatione, you will be pald such monetary. ¿Movinges la substontial accordanco with thore lows and regulatons. It, Io the courto of hio contract, you are directed to travel or aro authorled to ineur other expendad, reimbursoment for expenses will be made by the CENTRAL INTELLICENCE AGENGY la substantial accordance with applicable CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY regulation.. 7. HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL CARS. The CENTRAL, INTELLICENCE AGENCY will provide you with reasonable insurance covering medteal care and hospitallcation equivalont to that which could be obtaled through atandard Insurance policied: or, the CENTRAl. INTELUGENGE NOENCY may provide diractly nuch medical care aad hostialisadon. 8. SECRECY OBLIGATION: You will ba raquired to seep foraves secret this agreement and all information which you may obtain by reason hereol (unless released in writing by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENGE AGENCY from such obligation", with full knowledge that violation of such -3- MICROFILMED :!Lon 1970 DOC. MICRO. SER. --- ## Page 66 cocrecy may dubjecs gou to criminal prosecution under the esplonago laws. as smonded, and other applicable laws and regulations. Your selationship. with the CENTRAL INTILLIGENCE AGCNC! and this contract must be kept necret and you say sot discuns any aspect of this rolatioaship and contract with aay persos other than the Authorized Goverment Representative of such other person as he may specilically approve. 9. UNAUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS, No promiuer.or commitments portaining to rights, privileged, or bonaflin other than those exprosaly atipulated in weldog ln thie agreement or any amendment therete shalt be binding on the CRNTlAX INTeLLiGENes AGENCY, 19: JERY. Too asceoment in effectve as of 1 March 1969 and shall te for a terte of one fl yout. Al the end of that parted out contract shot be deemed to be renewed for another your unloas notice of termination has been furashed to you thirty (391 daye In advanço of the olapse of one il year, Theroalter the contract will be renowed automatically on similar terms ind conditions. This contract may be terminated at any time by olther party upon furalahing thirty (39) days advance notico. Upon termination of thie contract of renewals thereol, Including amondmenta. Lany, tho CENTRAL ENTELLIGENCE AGENCY will undertake to assist you in obtainind gainful eraployment on to provide continulag compensation to abeure you that you will be able to plantators coasonable standurd of living: This undertading is contingent upon your fulling the terma of this contract ind the continuing compliance with the secrecy obligations. MICRO-ILMED .=.0 1070 DỌC. MICRO. SER. --- ## Page 67 imposed or you by paragraph 8 of this contract and the provisions of any secrecy agreement whlch you have signed with the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. UNITED STATES COVERNMENT As Represented by the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Contractins Ollice? DA ACCEPTED: Bate Certified to be a true copy of the signed original which is on file in the Office of Security: 24, 74 Howard Grun HOWARD J: DIRECTOR OF ECURITY * 196s MICROFILMED '"L=n 1070 DUC MIÇRO. SER. -5- SEXTET 1 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10071-10380.pdf
104-10071-10380
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
04/20/1968
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CIA.
CIA.
CABLE RE PHOTOS OF RAY.
1
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK15 : F37 : 1993.07.31.11:21:22:090063 : PHOTOS OF RAY.
1
## Page 1 104-10071-10380 OUTING AND/ OR INITLALS - SEEH 405-201 FE ЕС/JROTФ 02231 220 8P:IL. 1968 170743 cfeg SPIC RE 109 HID COPY SECRET B U по вас FILE DE CS RETURNT Not Reor 20- 16.042 CHE DIRECTOR LI 133 93 2 3 0 10-3 A DIPSC JOR 931624 19600 (1791792) ATLANTAS DIO PROTOS OF RATIO FABAND APO ADDRESS 20 AFRIT BILL POUCH ICAS COPIES, 22 APRIL BE IT. nasaeein ja Days pouchire Ohotos for Liaison. Send steer copiesy photo of GalE CT Stars Coordeby bhoneritn An Elita Robert D. Brown Jd GEE/JKO arra COOEDINATING OF SECRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN TUE Craigai feeding alitiestion RAY Riderls SS OFFICER ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10071-10011.pdf
104-10071-10011
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
04/22/1968
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
FBI
CI/OBER
SUBJECT: RADIO MESSAGES FOR STOKELY CARMICHAEL DURING THE APRIL 1968 RIOTS IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
3
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK15 : F3 : 1993.07.29.17:20:13:060058 :
3
## Page 1 1104-10071-10011 I ENCLASSIFIED: SUBJECT: 1Opr. "ROM: YTERNAL -SE ONLY J COr DENTIAL ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SECRET CI/Ober suilding) "J: ¡Officer sesignation, room number, and i. 2. 3. DATE RECEIVED FORWARDED EXTENSION 6537 OFFICER'S INITIALS 5. 7. 3 NO. B-89 DATE 22 April 1968 COMMENTS (Number, gea comment to show from whors DES ONLY Originated by: DDP/CI/OP/Ober 22 April 68 Based on Memorandum for the Record br Source of xpap para 2 not identified Disseminated to: FBI on 22 Apr 68 o lip use PENOUS SECRET CONFIDENTIAL File: TROD PROD B-Memos (record copy) CC: SEGRET DIES ONLY INTERNAL USE ONLY 7518 B=89 UNCLASSIFIED --- ## Page 2 14-00000 SECRET NO FOREIGN DISSEM NO DISSEIN ABROAD 2 2 APP 1968 SUBJECT: Radio Messages for Stokely Carmichaal During the April 1968 Riots in Washiagton, D.C. 1. During the civil diaorders of 6 and 7 April 1968 in Washington, D.C. following the assassination of Di. Martin Luther King. Jr., an employee of this Agency heard on his car radio messages directed to Stokely Carmichael. The employee does not remember the station of which the program was broadcaat; however, he identified it as a local "rock and roll" station which was located in the 1400-1600 range on the AM dial. 2. An acquaintance of this empioyee also mentioned hearing during this period messages such as "Stokely Carmichael, please call your headquarters'; regular radio programs were inter- upted to broadcast these messages. Originated by: DDP/CI/OP/Ober:sg, 22 Apr 68 Based on : Memorandum for the Record Source of paragraph 2 not identified 15-21 NA ENOCIEN MISSFM MO DISSEM ABROAD --- ## Page 3 14-00000 SECRET 22 April 1968 -ONd FOR. 773 RECORD 3.0002: Radio messages for Stokely Carmichael during the riots in Washington D.C. 1453 mring the civil disorders of April 6-7, 02 following the assasination artin Luther king Jr., this writer heard on his car radio mes sages intended for Stokely Carmichael. Another acquaintance of mine also -entioned hearing such messages which would interrupt the program in progress to say, "Stokely Carmichael, please call your headquarters (or sore similar nessage)." The exact station is unknoim to me, except that it was in the 14001600 range on the AM dial and was a local rock-. and-roll station. Cours SEGRET 2-44 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10074-10027.pdf
104-10074-10027
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
1/6/65
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
WH/SA/IOS
WH/SA/
MEMORANDUM: REQUEST FOR POAS FOR HOMERO ECHEVARRIA AND OTHERS.
2
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK16 : F83 : 1993.07.16.15:21:17:460280 :
2
## Page 1 104-10074-10027 6 cHenry 2969 ARE TORA 14/BN/208 RETURNTO CIA Background Use Only *Do Not Reproduce BOBBLEE BCACTATRIA ASKIN d rach 19051 SOLFO AT CLIENTS 9 Aga 11 2922, Бачева, Ов 8007 1l. Albaaya Calesso, LUllrola BIT vertest of MICROFICHE REPRODUCTIONS DESTROY AFTER USE --- ## Page 2 00000-7L Pons c. 1929, ES, lates horse, cal ANdS FI assets 1a Cuba. MICROFICHE REPROPUCTIONS DESTROY AFTER USE ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-90137-10150.pdf
124-90137-10150
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
03/24/1961
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CR 105-97455-1
CIA
HQ
1
FBI
HQ
3/12/18
MEMO
null
## Page 1 124-90137-10150| JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 4/17/201 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER : 124-90137-10150 RECORD SERIES : HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : CR 105-97455-1 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: HQ TO: CIA TITLE : DATE: 03/24/1961 PAGES: 1 SUBJECTS: CIA LIAISON MATERIAL EDGAR SILVESTRE REYES DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Secret RESTRICTIONS: 1B CURRENT STATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 09/28/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF CIA COMMENTS : MEMO v9.1 HH 50953 D001d: 32337384 Page 1 2 --- ## Page 2 - Mr. Hayne 1 • Liaison n: 97455 Date: To: Fron: Subject: March 24, 1961 Director Central Intelligence Agency Attention: Deputy Director, Plans John Edgar Hoover, Director EDGAR SILVESTRE REYES INTERNAL SECURITY - [SPAIN (5) U) SHOT T HERE IN S UNCLASSIFTED ALE INFORTAATION CONTAINED CIA 4IAG *7 04 2 3TN TO Hi AND/OR A SOMaTON , Reference is made to Narch 10, 1961 your reference captioned communication dated KP 3-23-98 CS 61 3/764,325, concerning individual. 1) review of the files of this Bureau fails to reveal any data identifiable with Edgar Silvestre Reyes. 1 - Madrid (Enclosure-ccof (CIA let dated 3/16/612 1= Mexico (enclosure-ce of CiA let gated 3/16/61) 1 - Rio de Janeiro (Enclosure-cc of CIA let dated 3716161) 44) 783 - WW05 1 - Foreign Liaison Unit 4-8-98 CLASAIFIED CY 5648 SUO/ISR Ak: paf (9) 8/31/43 Classified 1 5883120 fl Declassify 56668-520/u 106-183 (5FK) JFK) "NOTE: CIA advised that captioned individual born 11/8/31 in Puerto Rico; is American citizen; had studied medicine at jon sons. university in Spain; had departed Spain 10/4/60; and reportedly _is now communist leader in either Cuba or Venezuela. CIA nont t requested anv information lahan - we might have ad coach. _(S) ins. one en. el- "er - 119611 Sullivan SECRED 3, Room ndy MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT HW 50953 DocId: 32337384 Page 2 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10510-10120.pdf
104-10510-10120
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
08/27/1965
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DR. ANTONIO MACEO
SMITH. VOCAT. REHAB.
LETTER:ATTACHED PLEASE FIND A COPY OF PREVIOUS MONTHLY COMMENTS
2
PRIVATE
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-64 : F7 : 1999.06.03.09:09:13:326128 :
2
## Page 1 104-10510-10120 11: it aist 2., liús De: intonio laceo PaDo j0x 1303 MIami, Florida 33101 6,8 Dear Do. tacos: astached iluse find a copy oi previous muntily.camer.ts by the Instructor it Lindooy Hopkino school regarding the above cuntioned individual's ircicir progross Ircluding a letter dates 12/16/64. by iarie i icirire, instructor ind a lettor of ro cat dite sroa his Inotrictor. Unfortunircly, tilo individurl duo to his illness i ope scion hus baci muine entrcuig little prores drin a exterdue iloi. "nis "as rou conlesui lio basse drsitin: couroc and, is le corec at 211, rolli jo into inchine dosies and a mojection bised or t tino tici he sicat in lourning the baalc dediun vould tidicate i do would zot Aloo there is acal concoin as to mechar is would over caster he subject oven by 1969, thorsiore, I tilic that no inva ¿oro 2o lid dui ie can co with thia individual and Siven Mi C opportunin but I foul that no can say mù this soint that ho cannot bo assabilitatue and dis not trainaulo. pocial Custo le 13 necuitary to drop hira fron our rohabilitation furat sincaroly yuurs, Gordon Do Satta, Counsolor Vocition: sonabilitation GaJ: cab cos farta ivans --- ## Page 2 LINDSEY HOPKINS EDUCATION CENTER DADE COUNTY• PUDUE SCrIDORO Da fun Felt, Deporte 8010 1. I ODOOND AVILTUR MALA CO, 7100IA • .. Facilla 8-8388. W : 1905 August 36, 1965 Ms. Gordon D. Smien Vocational Rehabililation Staro of Florida Depariment of Education 1350 N. W. 12th Avenue, Room 188 Miami, Florida 33136 Doss Mr. Smith: VOCALLUNAL RENADHCATION Mrome Gislict Orica at lie to seze report ol fugust 3, 1965 867 CRC student. _do quorod belon: "Dolinitoly nor employable al this lime. At masent sotarded sale of progross should complete Machine Drafting 8:31-3, upproximately end of third somosies.. Angust 1969. Basic Course 4131-1 should bo complored by and of third samostar August 6, 1965 - did not complara. Timo consumed 12 complero this 240 hou course, 842 houli. Extremely impeded postess due to foc Englian compro hension and medically induced slowness (Epileptic) sopcatedly noted on monthly Rohab reports Upon completion of the course, he would be unemployable bacauso le rakoe him lour limos longer than the normal person to complote his work." On sha baste of this information, perminarion or leteral transfer da recommonded. {22KS44 Rogiatration and Staustes EMA/ag: lips ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10126-10082.pdf
104-10126-10082
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
06/15/1978
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
THE DIRECTOR
SMITH, HAVILAND
NOTE RE HSCA INVESTIGATION OF THE MEXICO CITY STATION.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK57 : F2 : 20040226-1050133 :
1
## Page 1 104-10126-10082 200- June 15, 1978 NOTE FOR FROM SUBJECT : The Director : Haviland Smith : The HSCA Investigation of the Mexico City Station 1. The memorandum from Scott Breckinridge, attached hereto, dated 15 June, addresses only one aspect of our problem with the HSCA. In the fall of this year, the HSCA will prepare a report for the Congress which will be unclassified. There seems every likelihood that this report, whether we are able to contest it successfully either with the Committee or perhaps even in the Courts, will contain sensitive information, the revelation of which will be very damaging to our interests in Mexico. Not only will this report active es are dainst MexiCate a Duel ence activity in Mexica Gitka which The best example of this, but not the only example, is their telephone tap activity, the evidence from which will be an integral part of the HSCA's conclusions. 2. Mexico City is a focal point for Soviet intelligence operations against the continental United States. There is a long, documentable history of Soviet activities based in Mexico being run into our country. The relation- ship that is a critical ingredient in our ability to protect ourselves against these Soviet intelligence acti- vities. You will recall that the Boyce-Lee case was brought to our attention by those elements of the Mexican government. If, as we suspect, the Committee publishes the kind of information spelled out above, the result on this will be disastrous. It will seriously weaken our ability to protect our country from Soviet intelligence activities. 3. We believe that the issues raised by Chairman Stokes in his letter to you affords an excellent opportunity for you to underline to him some of the problems which are inherent in an ultimate declassification and publica- tion of the sensitive information they have gleaned from our files on general intelligence activities in Mexico City. This may not prove to be helpful in dampening the ardor of the HCSA staff, but it most certainly will put them on notice that the course they are taking will have direct repercussions not only on CIA activities in Mexico City, but on our bilateral relations with that country. 177797 19998 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10185-10220.pdf
104-10185-10220
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
07/22/1964
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
COB, MONTERREY
DEPUTY CHIEF, WH (SA)
DISPATCH:TRANSMITTAL OF SUBJECT REFERENCE LETTER FOR MAILING IN MONTERREY
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-20 : F14 : 1998.05.04.11:14:03:200120 :
1
## Page 1 104-10185-10220 RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce DISPATCH CLASSINCATION 3. I CBST PROCESSING # "TICA Chief of Baso, Monterrey chies of station, Mexico HEADY ANTENS DCHI IN ATSTRACT. -C9057 of Sutject Reference Lotter for Mailing in Monterrey *Đ: RECHENCE ACTION: 8eo Below aIr: mm 1163, I3 July 1964 trinitted herewith is a letter tron Subject of Reference for untling in Monterrey as establithed in previous correspondence The continued expeditious: forrding to Wendquartera, of return correspondence will be appreclated.. АССОМ FISHED KENKSTH I. PEILAROOX Attachment: As stated Diatribution: Or 1g. & 1 - COB, MNTY "/att. 1 = COS, MEXI RECLASSIFIED PI/AHT RI/" WHSA/CL ROUTING г/рV INITIAI +58711 ¡ CROSS REFERENCE TO CASSACATION SECRET doFICE WH/SA/CI OFFICER 0+5-JE 57M901 DATE WH/SA/CI 2z W44 WH/SA/EOB 19-6-102/21 264749651 DATE TYPED DATE DISPATCHED DISPATCH STRONA AND NUMBER neis tenths is toes 201 - 749651 Jirk ет. 4421 COORDINATING OFIXERS NAME 10s ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10337-10004.pdf
104-10337-10004
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
03/30/1995
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
PROJFILES-CIA MATTERS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
JOHN F. PEREIRA
CIA MATTERS - FOCAL POINT OFFICERS FOR ARRB REQUESTS
14
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK-M-21 : F5 : 20030804-974525 : UNIT INDEX
14
## Page 1 10410337.1001 ADMINFOTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY CSI-0324/95 30 March 1995 MEMORANDUM FOR: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: Executive Director Director, Center for the Study of Intelligence John F. Pereira Chief, Historical Review Group Appointment of Directorate Focal Points for JFK Assassination Board Requests (AIUO) 1. Action Requested: It is recommended that you request the Directorates to appoint focal point officers for purposes of responding to requests from the (President Kennedy) Assassination Records Review Board. (AIUO) 2. Background: President Clinton appointed the Board to oversee the release of records related to both the assassination of President Kennedy and the investigations into the assassination. The Board has forwarded to us the first (attached) of what are likely to be many requests for additional information from CIA records. The Board will not complete its work until late 1997 at the earliest. (AIUO) The Historical Review Group (HRG) has reviewed more than 400,000 pages of JFk-related records, most of which were contained in the "sequestered records" that were collected for the House Assassination Committee's investigation and in the Oswald 201 file. Up to now, no new searches have been required. Now that the Board has begun to generate requests for additional information, the Agency needs to create a mechanism for processing the requests and for tasking components to conduct records searches. (AIUO) 3. Recommendation: That you request each Directorate to appoint a focal point to work with HRG as the principal liaison with the Board, and that you name someone to perform the same unction for the DCI Area. Attached is a proposed memorandum for your signature. (AIUO John 1 F. Pereira Attachments: A. ARRB Request No. CIA-1 B. Proposed Memorandum ADMINISTRATIVE NAL USE ONLY --- ## Page 2 13-00000 ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAE USE ONLY SUBJECT: DCI/CSI/HRG/JPereira:bas/x30373 (30 Mar 95) Distribution: Original - Addressee 1 - Executive Registry 1 - D/CSI 1 - C/HRG 2 ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY --- ## Page 3 13,0.0000 SUBJECT: (Optional) FROM: Leo Hazlewood Executive Director / 7D55 OHB TO: (Officer dosignation, room number, and building) 1. CAL EXDLI 7D55 JOH 2. 3. C/EXDIR Staff (6E0703 *OHB 4. 5. Ed. Cohon 6. 7. ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET Appointment of Directorate Focal Points for JFK Assassination Board Requests EXTENSION NO. ER 95-8097 8-37900 } DATE 6 April 1995 / 001/BEG DATE RECEIVED FORWARDED OFFICER'S INITIALS COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) 07 APR | 1836 gor Ed- ADD 5% On tep of the one! 8. 10. 11. 12. 13: 14. 15. 10RM 610 (EF) SEINOUS EDITIONS ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY --- ## Page 4 13-0.0000 ADMINISTrATIVE INTERNAL USE ONIS ER 95-8097 6 April 1995 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Administration Deputy Director for Intelligence Deputy Director for Operations Deputy Director for Science and Technology Administrative Officer, DCI FROM: SUBJECT: Executive Director Appointment of Directorate Focal Points for JFK Assassination Board Requests 1. I would like each of you to appoint a focal point officer for your Directorate who would be responsible for responding to requests for information from the (President Kennedy) Assassination Records Review Board. (AIUO) 2. The Agency has received the first (attached) of what are likely to be many from the Board for information related to the assassination of President Kennedy and to the investigations into the assassination. Up to now, the Board has focused on the "sequestered" records CIA had collected for the House Assassination Committee's investigation and documents that had been part of the Oswald 201 file. It is expected that the new requests will require records searches to be done for additional information. (AIUO) 3. The Historical Review Group (HRG) of the Center for the Study of Intelligence (CSI), which has been the Agency's principal liaison with the JFK Board, will continue in that role. HRG will receive requests from the Board, and then forward them to the Directorate focal points for action. Responses from the Directorates will be coordinated by HRG, which will make the responses available to the Board. (AIUO) Please provide the name of your focal point officer to John Pereira, Chief, HRG (x303737 secure) by 13 April. (AIUO) Leo Hazlewood Attachment ADMINISPRATIVE NTERNAL USE ONLY --- ## Page 5 13-00000 ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY SUBJECT: Appointment of Directorate Focal Points for JFK Assassination Board Requests DCI/CSI/HRG/JPereira:bas/x303737 Distribution: Original - DDA Original - DDI Original - DDO Original - DDS&T 1 - AO/DCI 1 Executive Registry ExDir 1 1 anan D/CSI - C/HRG (30 Mar 95) AOMENESRATTVR - INERA USE-ONEX --- ## Page 6 13-00000 ra piadito Attachment widnisaro..nn :ww.sannsereaiscinioes.in.. --- ## Page 7 13-00000 Assassination Records Review Board 600 E Street NW O 2nd Floor O Washington, DC 20530 March 22, 1995 Mr. John Pereira Director Historical Review Group Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 RE: ARRB Additional Information Request No. CIA-1 Dear John: CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT I would like to thank you and your staff for your assistance and cooperation during our start-up phase. I trust that this bodes well for our work together during the upcoming years. In order to facilitate and coordinate our efforts, I will be sending to you, from time- to-time, requests for additional information and records to facilitate the completion of the ARRB's responsibilities under the JFK Act. We will be numbering these requests, as shown above, to help us track our queries and your responses. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Jeremy Gunn if our requests are insufficiently clear or if they are unduly burdensome. For our first request, we ask that you make available the following items: (a) Comprehensive organizational charts (or the best available substitutes) of the following entities for the years 1958-1968:' First, the Directorate of Plans (DDP or DD/P) including: Western Hemisphere Division (DDP/WH) Special Affairs Staff (DDP/SAS) Task Force W 'We are of course aware that the names, organizational structure, and reporting relationships of the entities identified below have changed over time. We have listed some divisions, offices, and staffs in order to facilitate the identification of organizational charts. If the Agency refers or referred to these entities by any other names or acronyms, we would of course intend our request to include those other names or acronyms. Telephone: (202) 724-0088 O Facsimile: (202) 724-0457 --- ## Page 8 13-00000 Mr. John Pereira March 22, 1995 Page 2 - Special Task Force Operations боровова Counterintelligence Staff (DDP/CI) Soviet Russia Division (DDP/SR) Foreign Intelligence Staff (DDP/FI) Technical Services Division (DDP/TSD) Records Integration Division (DDP/RID) Division D Western Europe Division (WE); Second, the Directorate of Support (DDS or DD/S) including: Office of Security (DDS/OS) (including Security Research Section); Third, the Directorate of Intelligence (DDI or DD/I) including: National Photographic Interpretation Center (DDI/NPIC) - Office of Operations (DDI/OO) Domestic Contacts Division including all DCD bases in Louisiana, Florida, and Texas; Fourth, the Directorate of Research (DDR or DD/R) including: - Special Projects Branch - Technical Services Division; Fifth, CIA stations in Mexico City (1960-68 only) - Miami OMWAVE) - other stations that we will discuss orally; Sixth, the Inspector General; Seventh, the Office of the General Counsel; Eighth, to the extent not otherwise included above, any entities with responsibility for liaison or communications with the Federal Bureau of Investigation on matters pertaining to intelligence or counterintelligence, and Ninth, any other offices, task forces, units, programs, persons, or other 'If there were persons (rather than entities) tasked with the responsibility for such liaisons with the FBI, please identify those individuals. --- ## Page 9 13-00.000 Mr. John Pereira March 22, 1995 Page 3 (b) (c) (d) (e) entities with any responsibilities for surveilling, conducting operations with respect to, or engaging in liaison with any pro-Castro groups (eg. Fair Play for Cuba Committee) or anti-Castro groups (e.g., Alpha-66, DRE, JURE, etc.). The names and affiliations of all CIA personnel responsible for liaison with the Warren Commission, the House Select Committee on Assassinations, the House Select Committee on Intelligence of the 94th Congress (the "Pike Committee"); the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (the "Church Committee"), and the Commission on CIA Activities within the United States (the "Rockefeller Commission"). All manuals, handbooks, memoranda, or guides explaining: (i) the for riza tions sue read 1 division of responsibilities within (ii) the filing systems or filing procedures for the entities identified in (a) above; and (iii) guidelines for drafting memoranda or completing forms. Examples of the type of documents we are seeking include the Clandestine Services Instruction (CSI), the Clandestine Services Handbook (CSHB), and the Directorate of Operations Handbook (DOHB). Copies of the instructions, guidelines, and other materials used by your reviewers in the review process. Barry Harrelson has already provided some - if not all - of these materials to Jeremy Gunn. A list or lists of cryptonyms, digraphs, codes, pseudonyms, numericals, file identifications, or other identifications appearing in the assassination records (to the extent that such a list or lists have been or could readily be created). To the extent that these materials are security classified, we will take all necessary precautions to protect them. --- ## Page 10 13-00000 Mr. John Pereira March 22, 1995 Page 4 I would like to thank you again for your cooperation. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Jeremy Gunn for any clarification regarding these requests. Sincerely yours, David G. Marwell Executive Director cc: Barry Harrelson T. Jeremy Gunn File 4.20.41 •.. --- ## Page 11 13-00000 UNCLÄSSIFIED INTERNAL USE ONLY ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET CONFIDENTIAL SECRET SUBJECT: (Optional) Appointments of Directorate Focal Points for JFK Assassination Board Requests FROM: Hugh E. Price EXTENSION NO. DD/095-1857 Deputy Director for Operations (7 E 30 0HB 37875} NICERSS DATE TO: (Officer designation, room number, and DATE building) RECEIVED FORWARDED COMMENTS a line oct so colom to eh out comman) to whom. 1. Chief, Historical Review Group 404 Ames B1dge 2. 3. CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS RELEASE ET FULL 2000/ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. FORM 610 USE PREVIOU EDITION: SECRET • CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED --- ## Page 12 13-00000 pig as ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY DO/IMS 95-069/2 95-1857 APR 1 8 1995 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Historical Review Group FROM: Hugh E. Price Deputy Director for Operations SUBJECT: Appointment of Directorate Focal Points for JFK Assassination Board Requests REFERENCE: ER 95-8097, dated 6 April 1995, Same Subject Based upon the expectation that most of the requests will be for information from our historical records, the Information Management Staff will take the lead role. The focal point will be Fred Wickham, Chief, External Support Group/IMS located in 1D4107 OHB, ext. 44448. Hugh E. Price cc: Executive Director ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY --- ## Page 13 13-00000 ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY #/95 DCI DA DI DO DS&T ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY FOCAL POINTS FOR JEK ASSASSINATION BOARD Doug Garthoff Becky Rant Jack Wright Kathryn Dyer (backup) Fred Wickham 37597h 137598 30554 54475 54644 44448 / 50104 --- ## Page 14 13-00000 ADMINISIBATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY 21 February 1997 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Pereira FROM: J. Barry Harrelson CSI/HRG, JFK Project Officer DI Focal Point for JFK Board SUBJECT: REFERENCE: I have been advised byl DIIRO, that he has replaced Point for Assassination Records Review Board requests. CC: @DI as the Directorate Focal ADMINISTRATIVE-INTERNALUSE ONLY ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32286578.pdf
124-10195-10354
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
02/23/1961
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
92-2781-136
DIRECTOR, FBI
SAC, TP
1
FBI
HQ
3/5/18
1
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 6/11/201 AGENCY: RECORD NUMBER : RECORD SERIES : AGENCY FILE NUMBER : FBI 124-10195-10354 HQ 92-2781-136 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: TO : TITLE: SAC, TP DIRECTOR, FBI DATE: 02/23/1961 ' PAGES: 1 SUBJECTS : LST, SUR, RES, TELCAL DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified RESTRICTIONS: 4 CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: - 10/01/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS : rcc... v9.1 DocId: 32286578 16 Page 1 --- ## Page 2 FD-3L(Rev. 12-13-56) FBI Date: 2/23/61 Transmit the following in Via AIRTEL PLAIN TEXT (Type in plain text or code) AIRMAIL (Priority or Method of Mailing) TO: DIRECTOR, FBI (92-2781) EROM: SAC, TAMPA (92-1) SANTO TRAFFICANTE, JR., AKA AR ReBuairtel to SAC, New York, dated 2/15/61 entitled "Criminal Intelligence Program" DAILY AIRTEL Spot surveillanges conducted 2/21/61 at subject's residence, 2505 Bristol Avenue, and the Columbia Restaurant, Tampa, negative. FRANK FALSONE, PCI (protect identity), advised 2/21/61 subject has not been seen at Columbia Restaurant, his usual spot, for approximately one week. Pretext telephone call to residence to person identify-" ing self as daughter elicited information subject out of town, whereabouts unknown and she did not know where or how to contact him. 3 - Bureau 2 Tampa SJL: jn (5) REC- 44 92-7781-136 112 FEB 25 1961 C c: Wick, . CRIL Approved: 5 0 MART 196 Pecial Agent in Charge Sent _M Per DocId: 32286578 Page 2 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10428-10260.pdf
104-10428-10260
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
10/8/63
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
RUSS HOLMES WORKING FILES
DIRECTOR
MEXICO CITY
CABLE: ACC LIENVOY 2 OCT 63, AMERICAN MALE WHO SPOKE BROKEN RUSSIAN
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK-RH16 : F17 : 20040330-1069409 :
1
## Page 1 110410428-10260] 1229 1301 ORIG.: EXT.: DISTR.: (44) LADILLINGER XXXX TO CLASSIFIED MESSAGE Commo: Chrone:. Sor Contacts J0-&x10-3 SECRET CLASSIFICATION DATE: 8 OCT 1963 FILE: DEFERRED ROUTINE PRIORITY OPERATIONAL IMMEDIATE INITIALE DIG. NUMBEP. INITIALS DIR INFO. CITE MEXI 645ü NUMBER IC IMPROVE 1. ACC ITENVOY JI OCT 63, AMERICAN MALE WHO SPOKE BROKEN RUSSIAN SAID HIS NAME LEE OSWALD (PHONETIC), STATED HE AT SOVEMB ON 23 SEPT WHEN SPOKE WITH CONSUL WHQM HE BELIEVED BE VALERIY VLADIMIROVICH KOSTIKOV. SUBJ ASKED SOV GUARD IVAN OBEDKOV WHO ANSWERED, IF THERE ANYTHING NEW RE TELEGRAM TO WASHINGTON. OBYEDKOV UPON CHECKING SAID NOTHING RECEIVED YET, BUT REQUEST HAD BEEN SENT. 2. HAVE PHOTOS MALE APPEARS BE AMERICAN ENTIRING SOVEMB 1216 HOURS, LEAVING 1222 ON 1 OCT. APPARENE AGE 35, ATHLETIC BUILD, CIRCA 6 FEET, RECEDIN HAIRLINE, BALDING TOP. WORE KHAKIS AND SPORT SHIRT. SOURCE: LIEMPTY. 3. NO LOCAL DISSEM. DIP OF 5 eriginaled. by 1. A. BILLENPER (P) SOORDINATING OFFICERS SECRET CLASSIFICATION OUTGOING WCCURT IS RELEASING OFFICER ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10254-10015.pdf
104-10254-10015
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
11/22/1963
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
MFF
LAUREANO BATISTA FALLS
SUBJECT: MOVIMIENTO DEMOCRATICA CRISTIANO.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK44 : F16 : 1998.03.17.21:19:09:606102 : CORRECTED TO 1 PAGE VICE 3.
1
## Page 1 104-10254-10015 'ECRF? MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM SUBJECT : THE FILES MOVINIENTO DEMIOCRATICA CRISTIANO #353 012 1. Subject Organization is of interest to CA/1 because it forwarded the attached letter (prepared by Laureano BATESTI falla--- 212 635) to Bela Kiraly of the Hungarian Freedom Fighters Inc.---a Office of Security data concerning Subject Organization or the writer of the letter. I there was nothing unfavorable available concerning then them to me to ten me teet with the wee tateve could be of help to subject group. A review of Office of Security records revealed that Subject Organization is an Anti-Castro group and that the writer of the letter was of interest to the Agency under an Operational Approval in 1960. cc: 212 635 GROUP 1 Eneloded trom automail: donograding 196 deciassificallon 5/MJ SECRET ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10178-10074.pdf
104-10178-10074
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
10/17/1960
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
WITHHELD
WITHHELD
1
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK64-14 : F15 : 1998.03.07.08:25:59:750108 :
1
## Page 1 104-10178-10074 DArE 114 17 OCTOBER 19688 TO DIRECTOR 15-19 PROM, LUXEMBOURG] ACTION: 6/51/0% INTO ! C/Fl, G/EE !, CLASSIFIED MESSAS SECRET BOUTINO NE,: 3/6 8 TO Ocr 17 10 2340 REG'O CABLE SECT. ROUTINE: IN 28612 20-19 CITE [LUXE 8252 15-19 PRITY ERAN INFO DIR vit jar D7 26817 (0ur 80536) • FOR RABLEY: MANKEL AVAILABLE. END OF MESSAGE S COMMENTS STATED IF MANKEL AVAILABLE WEEK 17 OCT RABNEY WOULD CONTACT JOUVEM IRECTLY TO ARRANGE MEETING WITH MANKEI SECRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER AN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. 17 OCT 1960 Copy-No. RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-10273-10041.pdf
124-10273-10041
04/26/2018
Redact
06/13/1975
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
62-116395-340
AG
DIRECTOR, FBI
7
FBI
HQ
3/12/18
Review PDF 62-HQ-116395 340_341-343_344_345X-347 pages: 317
null
## Page 1 124-10273-10041 SECRET to Mr. W. M. Felt Memorandum Re: LIAISON SECTION with other agencies is handled by domestic liaison supervisors dealing with those agencies. In similar fashion the British will not furnish derogatory (5) information directly to the Department of Defense in connection with its background-type investigations but require that such data be channeled through FBI. These are just two of the instances in which a foreign liaison ... matter becomes a domestic liaison matter and should be under the same supervision. Our foreign offices are necessarily closely involved in the operations of several U. S. agencies and require domestic liaison with those agencies. Our many problems surrounding the establishment and maintenance of foreign offices have to be coordinated with the Department of State. It is essential that we know and have access to the proper official at State in order to solve problems faced by the Legats as without prodding State moves very slowly. Our foreign offices work closely with the Central Intelligence Agency(ClA) stations abroad. CIA Headquarters does not permit its overseas stations to disseminate information to other agencies overseas, including our Legats, except in unusual circumstances. They frequently, however, suggest to our Legats that CIA Headquarters be asked for particular items. These can most rapidly be secured by direct request from a domestic liaison supervisor.? In a number of areas, our Legal Attaches work closely with (S) local representatives of the U. S. military. Leads are passed to our Legat which are then followed up by liaison contacts in Washington with the appropriate military headquarters. Liaison, or, in other terms, the establishment of a harmonious relationship, is basically the same whether practiced in Washington or Tokyo. I feel that it would be to the Bureau's advantage to have our liaison operations closely coordinated and directly supervised in the same area. This has proved to be an efficient and productive arrangement in the past, and we believe that the re-establishment of limited direct liaison in Washington should be handled by the same supervision which has been given to our posts abroad. The work in both areas is primarily intelligence oriented, yet does not fall within the normal responsibilitios of the present operational sections. It is considered that we should not leave the foreign supervision in its present area, which is fully occupied with Arab terrorism, Chinese espionage, and Cuban, Arab, Chicano and Jewish extremists.. A logical and economical step would be to make the present foreign liaison supervision an integral part of the new liaison section. Under this arrangement, the foreign liaison supervision would be handled as a separate and distinct unit composed of the three supervisors presently engaged in this work. This unit would be completely t = 2 - CONTINUED - OVER JFK (i)(B) ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10217-10011.pdf
104-10217-10011
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
03/18/1948
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF S
HARVEY, WILLIAM K., PBS
LEO YCHUDA CHERTOK, WITH ALIASAS LEO Y. CHERTOK AND LEO V. CHERTOK.
4
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-52 : F7 : 1998.04.21.17:16:35:543031 :
4
## Page 1 104-10217-10011 /- 18 Krich 1548 11 ins citrus gie subjocts Ino Ychuin Cle.00i, with alloons leo do Cherbik as Ie Vo Chorenk manand ly the Forloal luman ef form bloodless de Clar 100g0r1110L lema 000 Ercou. • Thoro posible, in pertliont inlivion in contact witt sos Informale asad assistinco and for tho Inforntion and diJUo sf bin tirrelor ENCLOSURE REGISTRY COPY SECIST 23 --- ## Page 2 •... . --.. 6 March 1'42 CATAL IN 1109X3: AL17 Jero Vo 5105Lc26 a toiler of all 6i0 traces Cucurani: l.5. for your tortion. To enteril 1ha laitia Claios In bolis 1o Tid Can Z22007:262812022 coatinonly since that tire Hir. tai5, iscy :35:i0d on January 1, 1227 at iri Jon. Citi, 1ns bund 191 mIle Cio: ay 3, 10020 Cranig fathor, josesi, baccao a naturalincú do jo citina 1: 1011308-076610e21r1 aboat I9lê and, consegucaly, dare da ca da tea cacira la tirinatio. In 2045 charon filed ablicatic ala Lie "tara L'o So prosuot for t:0 pause 0r d busines trip ta lalini, irrier, and locala. lis application for tilla anyone lag sodeed ?- • Is calliately of ta 1e0a0ler 130 d6 Cit arcHid 1939 si7 113 801011:1109568401.6411 tensivo concuralia in in loala sera 8u1N 51.01a.8:: Stato Impariat doo choraleant don tru die la list 6i 7 80% to tho cordot union and propoacd the ec1 e: 11:0.12'. a can of 30,00,0 for da piro can 05 233 rocairod in payaani dor incrican products ali que to sho isio In Coloser 19.2 tha 19X Lublinoi Mu 1a:c:L9t1a 00 1-0 192013 CiTa05 bared on inforration accivil to tis ef gie tial i 380.100 30% casin" had boca shird to hin at tin total infit, i dor, do?e anis Incidunt fallod to soflot sa inulliracu mislence, la: id sortess Mial Clin had acrilrod a Miu Mutation 30 40 0000n2151 1à 09:12205 209 What the bons cailn: had boch rhapsed to bis in aonnersion tits cints on lir part to procuro la so and lican corara Giu call aet=. 'äre -:= --- ## Page 3 as siderine dog Disto 16 me diersdend Wise 61:552818 10 2240000 that it-s. + a 50.980-891-0- 63:081116 a118 06 a30.7l. It 8.3 aleu snailad 1a 2iba Sier6: 16 88 018001 00 175..: 414t 2, a to la la born tim cogot ore 30600 8086050059116.8 11aT 05,1018:00701. recortla: to waves an abeady de parver. as an a.,3t of luch tha 0341 (007 20il) nad liri lory lucill core. Inartich as this Initial Invusl1:allon of CHu: 1a110: 1o rifloct his Inaliestion in intollienco activitio:s 08 80511 22, 1gko basis of on cno.-oue lotier pontarid 1o: 13, Nitro! thE C:100E H1C 170 10.01010 1 t0 Cia of i0:0: but no virile romas of 02:16g c220td22 a persoral friona of covio. trial in dos Cosit utin 1p'%: il, gigs, it Will in call, tea illies 17 a plino accide in l'axico ist, 1h9 S9dl01 stated Liat C:::70r lirindo: du visit frogiently sistend the corint Coulate dis in Train: Corm-c10n 11 40r Tork, Bit alie"a! li thu Retico d'at Cilil6r hal it illend entail 1s. L1 10,1108:9078 161316- 106!032°g torati: to muce this cornalin tair:941010: -80-19-11-8 pris deith cinal, inleila: lin no lero% ladlie: ..!a Lice on duno 25, 1925 les Mote to CarlTo! Maldi, enro, 89161805 01il 11505 sarine cho pascadio: to piers. antos onscarmin: the valuo or lis Sorot Coincts fur Lin piT, vino It man alia arcortilnal unal tho gpanina di làn macing de 18 notod, do the primary sorlor jusciusin: radium la llas U, So Miú me diálcial --- ## Page 4 Inand to ing 110n In Do ruportlin do dia 20I N.3 ausE iti 18l.% Corporatin: la lar inc: Sor 1ionalin1 C0:d.191: 811669 10 C01: 006101 i6 Forld iar II. 1/28ch as para char TTC. N427220/262000:00 1202103 defrontier ad 1:0? (now 1173) 806 X107 30 811 Pli e::1l d991 .19 Todo 290-91610+69 6994486 vostijillun o sic! by the 11'1 1a cunidaly ras lin Ls 666. 5. 6.1190 6a l'2och 29, 2966 -1a11: Le tus pel agronel era toda orde do dito dae Ditando escaraay 19A.11 18: 888 Milh ai lor d:e soviet uttiell: concernln, lão coollo tio fo a rios do Local. Lo Ma ioriot Valone CamaRol D0d0118 -100-150gle sou lot infra-e Ca, lide 908, 4:3: 80%, 809 9118 0191.01..18)18110 199:0e cail fasaio 1808:8 6686-9 livino. Imineh ao Chie 10v0019 HlIn, 18. 01919 °nte 190 C01208: 10615.31 Oro Tir A comilato rurer has loen cala dê de 150 filos conesring CH320%e The only pertinant sililiaial 1: fortior. Cit: 1:01 Larei 1i snit 6ão irresi = 3= ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10180-10216.pdf
104-10180-10216
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
01/01/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
MR PETER J DIGERVENO
CONTRACTING OFFICER
CONTRACT UPDATED.
4
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-16 : F12 : 1998.06.17.11:25:03:686108 :
4
## Page 1 104-10180-10216 "An. Mr. Palert. DigorTers Dans Mr. Digarsesos 153317.991. Band castract do desol sorrlicated by 570648 8000938 The tolled Stases Coveranent as sapponeniod Of Bho Car. NoT the sno of your carvice dad to parlormaco ol delion of a coallo i- dentil mature sador to follows 10r401816054681 1. Compensaloo, la full conslderaldon for Po sia 06 your corried and tho performance of special conadental dudes gos vill Do compenanted In an amoral calendled de lar Fata d 59100 por assa. ln conformanco with and enojoct is the gallelon of tale ofiaolasti Pretemly 1111 Preslia Fay la da accord agoal to Siftees par i63t (155) paid you direcily or gue ranited by to companan sia. thie peragraph conotitto locome for Todorsi la, purposes. Too wiil to sortein no do an Tell an tha procedaros used by pala or partialios du leapioner l lar reportiny respossillline wiil be baned primarily 10oa cor as 1a1 Nс4718Y 16409934110 Unloso procladed by nuch rogulrecesis, taneo will be withhold therefrom and entailed 6y 1440498514316 2. Irare' You will bo advasced or rolnsuread fade for Bravel and transportation esponsos for poo, pour depandesis and your • Doroundor, sul for you b'aro for aultoried aparational starel. ton moy ho entitiod do por alim in llen ol vabalutence 1s the comaso of all ErsTal parforased haround r and, who antsorised, sor you alons malle travol, transporailos ssd par dier provided los udas this paragrapa object lo payment 011 50-astay locompiano rita napless 8630099 laellily, mairiams da diraclad by lao Gorezareas. To's will ho almaced of taletarced --- ## Page 2 14-00000 11, 4 2095799 Il le Fucognitud tha1 poz Laliato do Ascosal edusea o? asy portia 150se0l fson day medles dio you podor lo dorso 3. Dosatiro fal You will ho astiliad to deala and disability Dunolla anal la l-06 anserined ador the Sedera S3Dl01900 C- pra det5- a Allo do arrendodo Chalmi by pol, yoor hairg, or logal repto- PAraonA Aet (50 D.8.60.A00 App. 1601-1828) (+) Tho Unite Nate GenIt hold 15950 tho compantalla dal poemdar thie consei social doteray dodondas 1560505100066 mica the Basti degentty Aes el el de MAIORINA, SAN IA PrOCONTON N ILO ODIAMOTOS (20SEAR1T 8-4153 Dy you oy en you badel 1d0y 1000044n 01 be tarere di Ol BI BITON ORA placas approred La nevaDeo by Appropliale daveranod (0) Tou ars berela anchered to apple fes mollmoal t o bella larruce pregaam la onptata seleuled Contrant to boar a sorsion al ton premiam c00l, pua síli tar te raraianer. Your Mantelal +681-s199t1il boetinald +44+s 9711771840664110 os ty d'Irie realando da pastodle larruale lo lo deteriend by bio lil Tosarebaten 6362071211 7986-99430 чbo10 (0S1941171055edb0speloln+11410183155301 --- ## Page 3 22 N+- 08 88022650NS COTAACTIONS copters of lie i. d. Proceduraliy, daed 01101470910 tilibe aliced salaat By the Werner butter oN In FeeTa 0000 01 210 Gone due goT cades B36 Mi Elesto T. 1l, la tho pertaroraco of corriede andcho ins cantody ol Covarmas: terda er ento clile ol record lo properly at any scinto malodorar sad aberores aluard, which propriy bao In luel bede Feschesed iles sonist o1 tae U. 9. Coroismeal, you harosy socogalla and aetnow'ouga le antiteaco ordense this relationeer. lo coatrai and all delorenlos ubled you may obtala by sezaos barool and pennecation soder toy darlosage dant, taied ly duen 154ã, da assesad. matructless roceived by you spora coo 21371101 1INI 1UID DISCO ATON HE TA bareal. DIVEly -1000i is Trid some 19Y 3006913 tArte Torm, Thin contract le ofloctire so of l Septerades 19t1o and nell 20nane therealias ius a parlod d too (3) yoss valedo (a) Egan Pality (14) daya' acteal musts by astaar prety loreto, on 11) Upas Arteal noles do you to too stani eso pastica al su enlilaliy repairal medieni enamirailor aro doter. --- ## Page 4 estondos pos aoice len the Gamranta Ite 0veat 06 v0I-4a1 prlos do lao espirados of ltio agronment of any renored lernol. yu olil nas ho snallod lo rotoro aravel expondo lo your parasauca plaço of UNITID DIATES COVICINMXNT Contracting Olfiett ACCEPTHO! APPROVEDI ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10180-10187.pdf
104-10180-10187
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
11/11/60
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
HAVANA
CABLE-COVER COMPANY HAS INSTRUCTED HIM LEAVE CUBA.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-16 : F11 : 1998.06.14.11:55:11:373107 :
1
## Page 1 104-10180-10187 * 106 = : 11 NOY 60 ¿ DIRECTOR * HAVANA CRON I WH9 150 • COP, ADOP/A, S/C 2 CLASSIFIED MESSAGE ROUTING 3 File 201 NOV 11 1100z 60 PRIORITY IN 41186 PRITY DIR CITE HAVA 6888 JMNET AMIRE-L'S COVER COMPANY HAS INSTRUCTED HIM LEAVE CUBA. IF HE STAYS HE WILL LOSE THE S3BB A MONTH GUARANTEED SALARY THAT HE WAS GETTING FROM THE COMPANY EFFECTIVE I NOV 60 SAYS ME CAN REMAIN ON HIS OWN WITHOUT A COMPLETE BREAK WITH THE COMPANY, BUT THAT HE MUST HAVE AN ADDIT S38D A MONTH RETROACTIVE TO 1 NOV. AMERE CARRYING HEAVY LOAD, TAKING HEAVY RISKS AND MAINTAINING FAMILY IN SEPARATE ESTABLISHMENT. IN PBRIME. RECOMMEND APPROVAL® ADVISE SOONEST• FILED 181625Z END OF MESSAGE Code, REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROMISITED. Copy No. → Bird ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-90012-10033.pdf
124-90012-10033
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
12/16/1963
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
105-124552-2
HQ
MM
4
FBI
HQ
3/12/18
MEMO
null
## Page 1 124-90012-10033 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 6/15/201 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER: 124-90012-10033 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 105-124552-2 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: MM TO: HQ TITLE : DATE : PAGES: SUBJECTS : 12/16/1963 4 MARIO OSCAR BALDATTI BRIEBA BERNARDO ALVAREZ DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Secret RESTRICTIONS: 1A CURRENT STATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 06/12/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: APPROVAL OF CIA COMMENTS: MEMO v9.1 NH 50953 DooId: 32323264 Page 1 --- ## Page 2 IONAL FORM NO, UNITY * STATES PERNMENT Memorandum TO Director, FBI REX DATE: 05G: 1 6 1963 FROM SAG, Miami (105- 3175) (P) CIA HAS NO OBJECTION TO DECLASSIFICATION AND/OR, CHANGED RELEASE OF CIA INFORMATION SUBJECT: 5-9-98 MARIO OSCAR BALDATTI BRIEBA, akaHIS DOCUMENT ExCEP CLASSIFIED BY 5668 SU/SMario Oscar Baldatti, JECLASSIFY ON: 25X JFK D-iMM3-254k4 Maria Baldati rept 413S 4-3-4 IS - CUBA NEUTRALITY MATTERS 3÷7 013333043 tora: 0860109060 SEr SIDE CLASSIIOATION ACTION Title changed to reflect the complete name of subject according to Spanish usage, that is, MARIO OSCAR BALDATTI BRIEBA, and also the name by which he is generally known; MARIO OSCAR BALDATTI, spelled with double Reference Bureau letter to Miami, 110/71 enclosing a CIA Information Report Wlan #B- 3/656/9305 ca to Bomb Ship." 2016) Losed for the Bureau are copies Of LHM \dated. and "captioned as fabove. VELOVD'# classifie BOSECRET It' contains Inorgero MM TAERES with referenced Burear Report received 1s also designatedle òi the contact with EX representative Miami, Florida on October 23, 1963 DEG /Florida. UMM, Te2 torecord of Local Draf Base 147, 38 600 CIA Agentcat Miami, torias advised he had been 124552 Bureau 2 Mlami JJO :JMS Copy iò: (4) Sinte, REG 15-01 INS-425 a Customs 281A + 205-111-4-6-64 Critiate res will 462 14-11-641 SECRET 1 08G 18 1963 MINATION DISSIN tiate.... NH 50953 D001d: 32323264 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 MM 105-8175 SECRET the contact of free lance pilot DAVID BROWN, and that after the original allegation was received from BROWN the latter was instructed to immediately contact CIA in the event further developments took place in the alleged plan of subject BALDATTI. Mr.I tated he had not been contacted again by BROWN and he was relatively certain that the alleged plan had not further materialized. at least as far as BROWN would be concerned. Mr. advised that his office hading pbjection to contact of BROWN by FBI, Miami. Ela 22005.1.3rd Aive ender Aversa Records of Immigration and Naturalization Ser VICe (INS), Miami, reflect that RUBEN RICARDORAVERSA, Allen RegiStreation #12 912 525 who it is recalled is listed by subject BALDATTI in his Draft Board registra- tion as the person always knowing his address), arrived at Miami on April 10, 1962 from Argentina with a resident visa. This is the same date Subject BALDATTI arrived in the United States with a resident visa. AVERSA was born October 2, 1935 in Buenos. Alres, Argentina, and is married to JILLIAN OF LILLIAN LESBITIAPORTER, a person of British nationality. The INS file indicated that as of January, 1963, AVERSA was employed by the Maru Irading Corporation, Pan American Bank Building, Miami. Avera Copies of LHM are being sent locally to CIA, Customs, INS, Border Patrol, FAA,3n3 State Department, Coordinator of Cuban Affairs, ONI, OSI and G-2. MIAMI, at Miami, Florida (1) Will contact U.S/ Border Patrol and FAA, Miami, to ascertain if subject may be known to engage in flying REVIEWED BY ESWUFK TASK FORCE ON 9/4/2d2 A RELEASE IN FULL SECRET •J RELEASE IN PART J TOTAL DENIAL SECRET d9915-19033 NH 50953 DocId: 3232326 Page 3 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10126-10253.pdf
104-10126-10253
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
06/28/1978
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
JOURNAL OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL WEDNESAY 28 JUNE 1978.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK57 : F9 : 1993.08.07.07:05:30:750027 :
1
## Page 1 104-10126-10253 • Tenserony • Journal - Office of Legislative CounschRETURNTO GIA Page 3 Wednesday - 28 June 1978 Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce 7. (Secret - MMP) LIAISON Julie Wotzel, NSA, called to adviso us that a lettor was coming over from NSA to Lyle Miller, Acting Legislntixe.Counsel, on the subject of the leak of NSA's ability to read diplomatic traffic. She said that the lotter states that NSA"has no objoction to the Director's provision of NSA's damage assessment to the House Permanent. Select Committee on Intelligence. The letter goes on to state that NSA does not feel that it would be appropriate to reveal. the names of Congressmen and staff who are aware of NSA'S capability to read diplomatic traffic inasmuch as the Attorney General is investigating the leak. 8. (Confidential - MMP) LIAISON Called Luch Johnson, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence statt, to advise him (based on information provided by Suzanne Black, Office of Public Affairs), that the Agency has no past or present substantive involvement with WEIA. J in response to a previous request from Johnson. I also asked Johnson how much information he wished us to provide him on the Agency's relationship with public television. He indicated that he is only interested in a brief sketch of what kinds of relationships the Agency may have had with public television and I passed this requirement on to Ns. Black. 9 . (Confidential • DFM) LIAISON Received a call from Ed Greissing, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staff, regarding the House Satect Committoc on 1s of testimon equest tor access to Church Committee transcripts of testimony by Agency employees. I asked him to send Ted Shackley's testimony to me so he could review it before giving approval. I reminded him that Mr. Sanchez had asked that his testimony not be shown and that that should be considered the final Agency response. 10. (Secret - DFM) LIAISON Called Earl Eisenhower, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staff, who mentioned he would like the briefing on counterintelligence to be presented to the Committee during the first week of August. I later picked up a letter from Eisenhower on this subject. We confirmed tomorrow's briefing of four Committee stati members to cover the Martha Peterson case, specifically the allegations of poison pills; the discovery of the antenna in the chimney of the Moscow Embassy; and the Shevchenlio case. Eisenhower repeated his carlier request to Lyle Miller, Acting Legislative counsel, for a trip to NPIC to viewWrangel Island which is part ›f the USSk but which some U.S. citizens claim really belongs to the U.S. Eisenhower had viewed maps of the Island but wants to see photographs as none of the mays are more recent that ten ycars old. I agreed to try to set this meeting up for Friday, 30 June. 20437 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10178-10134.pdf
104-10178-10134
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
04/19/1968
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
WITHHELD
CABLE- 19 APR BOTH LA PA Z MORNING PAPERS CARRIED PAGE 1 WIRE SERVICE PHOTOS OF FBI WANTED POSTER.
1
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK64-14 : F21 : 1998.03.07.12:19:19:090108 :
1
## Page 1 104-10178-10134 CANET SEE RATANIAS DISSERATI a Find canoeino ADVANCEGUIY 01894915960€ TOTAL COMES SECRET S8 Mour Fulled Iral MENANDUE DON OF TRISELY PROMISITIO CLAUDITY TO MURA NO A PRO PO PIANO. 294 041) I 18 TIALS - SEIN BY D181ah mY B8 mo.com 10-16 S EiR ET E APP OS CITE [LA PAZ 4228 & IRECT UR SABAr WOrUSE REF: DIRECTOR $2664 lo PLEASE POUCH PHOTO. 2. 19 AYR BOTH LA PAL MURNING PAPERS CARRIED PAGE 1 WIRE SERVICE PHOTOS OF FOI WANTED POSTER• 3. NO STATION TRACES. SECRET ET indisca TIRAVE PROGRAM TABSIRACI STBAI REST. CADE CARE DEIN (UD) Too (0) 10a 686 DESENSTIZCI EU DOI IU-18 RECORD COPY SECRET 19 pile68 661232232 RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only Do Not Reproduce ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10217-10151.pdf
104-10217-10151
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
7/8/70
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
WH/MIAMI
CABLE RE: AMCALL-1'S WIFE TOLD GORDON M. BINIARIS ON 27 JUNE THAT AMSOUR 1 CASE HAS NO SOLUTION
3
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-52 : F13 : 1998.05.03.18:00:22:356115 :
3
## Page 1 104-10217-10151 *'st CABLE SECRETARIAT DESEMHATION • PRASCHEZONT METERS INUES LASSIFIED MESSAGE SECPET When Filled lad descens ROUTINO AMBISA MILLE SUEN I 6 AFe. EL ASIPY TO CS FRE NO. MAGE TO ES TRE NO O PLEAD O RETURE TO BETION C/ wHs FILE, VR 829 "S§ CRES 8814BAZ JUL 18 CITE VIVELANI 8181 DIRECTOR INFO • RYBAT TYPIC AMERU AMCALL AM SOUR 8JAM 118808 REF A DIRECTOR 048796 B WHAT 8138 (~ 116495) 1o AMCALL-J'S WIFE TOLD GORDON M. BINIARIS ON 27 JUNE THAT AMSOUR-I CASE HAS NO SOLUTION, NOT EVEN BEING STUDIED FOR POSSIBLE SOLUTION AND BOC HAS NO INTENTION OF EVER STUDYING CASE FOR SOLUTION. FIDEL. CASTRO-REGARDS ANSOUR-! AS DIRECT BETRAYAL OF PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP. CASTRO FREQUENTED HOME OF AMSOUR-1O AMSOUR-I CAUGHT WITH MICROFILM IN WHICH CASTRO'S MOVEMENTS VERE BEING REPORTED ON DETAILED BASIS. CASTRO TOOK IT AS PER SONAL AFFRONT AND BETRAYAL OF FRIENDSHIP. 2. ON SEVEN JULY BINIARIS AGAIN QUERIED AMCALL-L'S WIFE RE AMSOUR-I •SE. SHE STATED THAT, SHE ONLY REMEMBERED THAT AMECRU-I HAD STATED THIS CASE HOLLD BE MOST DIFFICULT TO SOLVE BECAUSE IT WAS IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS THAT OF HUBER ROGELIO MATOS BENITEZ (201-266268). SHE THEN FOLLOVED THE SAME RATIONALE AS PARA ONE. SHE ADDED THAT THE AMSOUR-1 CASE "HEANT NOT KING TO HER BECAUSE SHE VAS NOT PERSONALLY INOLVED IN IT AND BECAUSE • AMERU- MAD HAD ONLY TOUCHED ON IT VERY LIGHTLY DURING THEIR MEETING IN MADRID: 3. - 'ASSUMPTION REF B PARA THO CORRECT, POSSIBLE REASON WHY MONEY HAS == SECRET --- ## Page 2 14-00000 is 70-8-0-79720-00210 -CABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMINATION 1 PERSONUNIT NOTEIRD ADVANCE COTT ROTTER #57. • DHARM BY ACTION UNIT • ACTION NO то AT0- FE#. CLASSIFIED MESSAGE TOTAL COPIES 170092639 REPRODUETION OF TAIS CORT PROMIBITED NOIR DI D CLASSIFY TO CS FREDO. RAKE TO CS FILEND D FLERE D RETURN TO. ROUTERO ANDIOR ANTIALE-FELD BY • BRANCH FILE, VR PAGE 2 UNMIAMI 8181 SECRET YET TO BE DEPOSITED DUE TO SEVERAL TELEGRAPHIC ERRORS. ORIGINAL CABLE SENT BY BINIARIS UNDER NAME OF MOTHER OF AMPANIC-7. CABLE DELIVERED WITHOUT SIGNATURE (ACCORDING TO AMECRU-12. ON TWENTY THREE JUNE AMERU-I SENT RETURN CABLE TO MOTHER OF AMPANIC-T ASKING IF ORIGINAL CABLE CORRECT SINCE NO SIGNATURE, AMEGRU-I ASKED THAT REPLY BE SENT TO HILBERTS PARK HOTEL IN GERMANY. NO CITY GIVEN IN ADDRESS. AND CABLE SENT AS INSTRUCTED. IT RETURNED TO SENDER DUE TO INCONPLETE ADDRESS. ON TWENTY SEVEN JUNE, BINIARIS INSTRUCTED WIFE OF AMCALL-! TO SEND CABLE TO CORRECT ADDRESS. INSTEAD WIFE OF AMCALL-I VISITED MOTHER OF AMPANIC-7 AND REQUESTED MOTHER SEND CABLE TO AMECRU-I. MOTHER AGREED TO DO 1 KIS. HOWEVER UP TO PRESENT TIME OUTGOING COPY UNOBTAINABLE SINCE BINIARIS CANNOT ASK FOR IT AND VIFE OF ANCALL ANCALL-1 DOES NOT VANT TO ASK FOR IT. TO SOLVE PROBLEM BINIARIS ASKED AMSIGH-2 TO VIRE AMEORU-1 AND ASA HIM WHY MONEY HAD NOT BEEN DEPOSITED AS INSTRUCTED. AMSIGH-2 AGREED TO SEND CABLE. 4. ON SEVEN JULY WIFE OF AMCALL-I RECEIVED LETTER IN OPEN CODE FROM AMERU-I DATED ONE JULY STATING HER CASE WOULD BE SOLVED SATISFACTOR IL Y AND TO LET HIM KNOW WHEN REST OF MONEY AVAILABLE. BINIAR IS TOLD HER TO AGAIN TELL AMECRU-1 MONEY. WOULD. NOT BE RELEASED UNTIL MONE Y DEPOSITED SWISS ACCOUNT AS STATED IN REF A PARA TWO. SECRET --- ## Page 3 14-00000 CABLE SECRETARIAT DISSEMHATION PERICIANT NOTITED • ROMANCE COOT -CI ASSIFIED MESSAGE SECRET (When Filled la) HEPRODUCTION OF THE EJE INDEE D va CLARITY TO CO FEE MO - RATE TO ES TIE NO. . O FRE NO D RET TO TOTAL CRIES. ROUtena 1N::: 119 DIANEM AT HE TION UNTY NETION не Đ+z. FILE, VR "PAGE S UNIAMI 8181 SEGRET COPY OF INCOMING CABLE FROM AMERU-I BEING SENT IN UFAA-2139. STATION COMMENT: IT POSSIBLE AMERU-! VIEING FOR TIME IN THIS STRANGE EXCHANGE OF CABLES. NOTHING ELSE KNOWN AT MOMENT HERE. WILL CABLE ASAP DEVELOPMENTS. % FILE: 201-B61063, 201-275949, AID 201-325064. GP-1 SECRET SECRET ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10006-10246.pdf
104-10006-10246
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
3/11/64
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
201-289248
NAME CHECK REQUEST - JOSEPH DALLIN
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
OSW12 : V53B : 1996.06.07.10:23:57:690092 :
1
## Page 1 1104-1006-10246| FROM: BRANCH (Requestero name) O • A-N• BRASHO ROOM 5R/CI/R 5 - 39 TO TUBE ROOM DATE RID/INDEX DT- 5 REQUESTER RID/FILES DT- 6 RID/ANALYSIS GT - 7 RID/201 DW- 6 RID/MIS GT - 6 RID/INDEX SURNAME VE DALLIN Joseph SPELLING VARIATIONS TO BE CHECKED AKA, ALIASES • SECRET BADGE NO. 3H905 EXTENSION 7735 INITIALS DATE NAME CHECK AND CONSOLIDATION REQUEST RID CONTROL NO. 1I MAR 64 CHECKING INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT TO BE CHECKED GIVEN NAMES OTHER IDENTLEY IOnS. TAc Occupation, 80x. Le menadeadi Lectured to U. 5: Marines In the Philippines Leff USER CA 1917 SEX DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF OUT 5. 5. 01 CITIZENSHIP RESIDENCE RESULTS OF RID/INDEX CHECK COMMENTS NO PERTINENT IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION CARD REFERENCES ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUESTERS IN ALI, CASES 201 CONSOLIDATION Use gummed label; type or print all 1. Return this form with the card repro- entries. ductions, also return pertinent documents, Upon receipt of index card reproductions aperture cards and the dossier if a 201 or draw a green diagonal line across the Items you do not want. Edit (use green) the reproduced index cards to indicate: copy or cross reference (a) cards to be destroyed (mark with green D and note reason for destruction) below: Examples: document destroyed; duplicate or less informative than retained in- formation; information of no CS value. (b) corrections and additions, inclu- ding infinity symbol oo when card in- cludes all facts contained in the document. (a) • Consolidate into 201- (b)[ Open 201 file on subject. RESTRICTION (If any) ASSIGNEEM INO Note 1. Records of COI, SSU, OSS and CIG OTHER INTERESTED DESKS OR STATIONS БА REF? are in RID/ARD, and those that meet TRID DESK indexing criteria in CSHB 70-1-1 are Note 2. Information concerning foreign carded in the CS Main Index. If you public personalities (except believe there could be additional in- tary) may be available in BR/OCR formation of value in these recoras, x7997. you must request an Archives Index search. DATE SIGNATURE OF RECORDS OFFICER ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10123-10265.pdf
104-10123-10265
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
7/1/49
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CHIEF OF STATION( )
C/FB, CIA
OPERATIONAL, HEDE MASSING.
1
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK44 : F8 : 20040225-1049084 :
1
## Page 1 104-10123-10265 OFFICIAL DISPATCH 3 0- cried oy tEr6is Calafe regslen "es. FALIAI SAFI1E 5 201015 goce lisrg ¡rso. higsi AaNansy 10N5 $ phs id sid : E: € SE e ihnts n3tsg Bame3 2ạ, 2!. nilaller e midittung toas Ie9E 811e114 17 19-5 E20 214 Se4.e wgsene SToni I aaldoet eig eperate motio 10 10 R:4 0.7.4 #:1.17s i 1a2s Na e9et trodue i ie mtama to tracdke vulrcte ts soreser nabturoiraln, Mire 1901 5 Rer2g 180sA 3tes 799621 #84655145. 095151 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10439-10108.pdf
104-10439-10108
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
12/16/1963
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
RUSS HOLMES WORK FILE
DIRECTOR
WITHHELD
CABLE: ASKED INTERROGATE RIDDERSTRALE 9 DECEMBER
2
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK-RH04 : F108-III : 20040331-1070083 :
2
## Page 1 104-10439-10108 / SECRET TO : DIRECTOR FROM ACTION: C/Wt 4 INFO , DCI, D/DCI, DDP, C/CI, C/Ci /SI, RI/ AN DUMMY, VR 41a2n ROUTING 2 5 T: f.710win5 aotion 18 authoriod: DE SENSINZE Signed: R.0. #1 - Untt. c//R+A Note: If destruction, cite reasons and coordinate eppropriate. BC 63N8 1715 Document Number 4-08- for FOIA Review on MAY 1976 S E C R ET 1615257 DIR CITE 14362 RUDIT GPFLCOR REF DIR 88581* CLASSIFICATION REVIEW CONDUCTED ON 5- BAY 15/05 _ IMPDET CL BY 012208 1. ASKED TIPSTATES INTERROGATE RIDDERSTRALE 9 DEC. THEY TIED UP WEEK 9-13 DEC. 13 DEC THU SAID WOULD CONFER THI AND T/LO DEC 14 OR 16 TO ARPANGE INTERROGATION. 2. ALBRECHT AGAIN APPEARED EMB 12 DEC. VOLUNTEERED "KEEP EYES AND EARS OPEN" FOR MATTERS POSSIBLE INTEREST JACONNETY, IMPLIED ILE KNEW JACONNETY KUBARK, TRIED SEVERAL PLOYS MAINTAIN CONTACT, YET SAID HE WANTED NOTHING DO WITH KUBARK, POLITICAL MATTERS, OR MILITARY• ALL THIS IN FACE RATHER COLD RECEPTION AND GENERAL EXPRESSIONS DISINTEPEST. SAID HAD JOINED YOUNG REPUBLICANS NY TO INTRODUCE NOTE "LIBERALITY" BUT WAS BOUNCED FOR SUGGESTING 201-289248 SECRET REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED GROUF acluded hrom ou Copy No. --- ## Page 2 13-00000 CLASSIFIED MESSAGE SECRET IN 81715 PAGE 2. 7' NUCLEAR TEST BAN• 8 GPFLOOR MATTERS PERMITTING, REQUEST ODENVY TRACES ASAP. See Sanitized File B Number For sterilg. copy of this document. 3. RE LETTER BYY"RYO", TA CHECKED ALL NAMES CHINESE IN EMBASSY MEDIATELY WITHOUT FINDING LIKELY CANDIDATE. WILL CHECK NAMES ALL CHINESE SWEDEN AT EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY. 40 INDEX ALBRECHT. ECRET 231 C/S. Comment: #Assumer Ridderstrale. stu: planned ask its lisison to interrogate. 52 at SECRET ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32308844.pdf
124-10296-10172
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
08/30/1958
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CR 97-3445-26
DIRECTOR, FBI
SAC, NY
2
FBI
HQ
3/3/18
2
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 6/12/201 AGENCY: RECORD NUMBER : FBI 124-10296-10172 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER: CR 97-3445-26 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FROM: TO : TITLE : FBI SAC, NY DIRECTOR, FBI DATE: 08/30/1958 PAGES: 2 SUBJECTS : JAN, CUBA REBELDE, FINANCES, ASSOC, TRA DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified RESTRICTIONS : 4 CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 04/07/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS : v9.1 DocId: 32308844 Page --- ## Page 2 FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-561 FBI. COT Date: 8/30/58 Transmit the following in - AIRTE (Type in plain text or code) Via Ain. BERLINTS LXCEPT W WISE® MATTON CONTARNNDIAD NO CR FROM: SAC, NEW YORK (109-106) Decleselly on: OADR-L 211,32 070/144901-551 0 BY 5068220/60 11. 0201 TO: riority or Method of Mailing SCURRIAT AND TIR CESTORS DINSR 1114-47 DIRECTOR FBI (97-3445) 10 - 21-97 ADVISED B St 1P 5%1 DATE No SUBJECT: DIRECTORIO OBRERO REVOLUCIONARIO aka, RA, IS = CUBA TABETADO/DIONISIO LIMA PEREZ protect identity, with whom insufficient contact hás been had to determine his reliability, advised sA ROBERI Ad BERMINGHAM, 0/29/50, he ha learned from -ROGALLOTHOLES DIrECTOLLO OBRARO REVOL CIONARLO DOR) leader in New York that the DOR and the CUBANA REBELDE have 200 men armed and ready to depart for cuba at moments notice, sLinajuas unable to determine the point of departure, method of travel or approximate time of departure other than the fact it could be any day. He identified ROIG, Dr./ LaGUARDIA, a Negro Dentist who 1s acting as head of the Cubana Rebelde, and JESUS RODRIGUEZ, a DOR member, alf of New York, • as readers of this planned pedition, exa -xplained that the DOR is not cooperating with any other revolutionary group other than the Cubana Rebelde, Inasmuch as the DOR was not invited to the recent cuban revoluthonary meeting in Caracas, Venezuela. " He advised that he has heard that the July 26 Movement has organized an armed expedition of 3000 men in the states and also expects to land in cuba in the near He advised that he has also heard that Venezueal is wide open for cuban revolutionary activity and for the obtaining of arms. 3-Bureau: (97-3445) (RM). 3-Miami (97-186) (1-DOR) 9-3. V 1-cubana Rebelde I-Jwly 26 Movement 1AD 26 529203445- SEP * 1958 '3 109-106 DOR.) I-New York I New York -New York Approy New York _M NAI. • COT Mr. Tolson. Mr. Mohr_ Mr. Nease_ Mr. Parsons. Mr. Rosen_. Mr. Tamm. Mr. Tretter MTr. W.C.Sallivan Tele. RooTa. Mr. Holleran Miss Gandy. UNRECORDED COPY FILED IN N =1483 DocId: 32308844 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 FD-36 (Rev. 12-13-56). 00 FBI Date: Transmit the following in Via (Type in plain text or code) (Priority or Method of Mailing) NY 109-106 JIMA Purther advised that the DOR in Miami has become disprganized due to a split up between JOSE CALEMAN ANGEL COFINO anChHIRIGOYEN, but ROlG continues so have contact with members In Miami and With HIRIGOYEN JOSE ALEMAN is said to be furnishing money tolthe Cubana Rebelde In Miami. FLIMA advised that ROIC stated that he expects LIMA, to take part in the expedition. ALIMAtagvised that he intends to back' out at the last minute office. INS and customs will be notified locally. Bureau and interested offices will be kept advised. FOSTER - 2- Approved: Special Agent in Charge Sent STORETT _M Per DocId: 32308844 Page 3 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-10373-10019.pdf
124-10373-10019
04/26/2018
Redact
12/20/1977
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
62-117290-TICKLER FOLDER
AG
HSCA
19
HSCA
INC FOLDER, LET, MEMO
null
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 4/3/2018 AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER : 124-10373-10019 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 62-117290-TICKLER FOLDER Document Information ORIGINATOR: HSCA FROM: HSCA TO: AG TITLE: DATE: 12/20/1977 PAGES: 19 SUBJECTS : 12/20/77 REQUEST H. L. LEE, R. D. RACKLEFF, ETAL DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified RESTRICTIONS: CURRENT STATUS: DATE OF LAST REVIEW : OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS: INC FOLDER, LET, MEMO v9.1 --- ## Page 2 Date : 03/27/99 Page JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY : FBI RECORD NUMBER : 124-10373-10019 RECORDS SERIES HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER 62-117290-TICKLER FOLDER DOCUMENT INFORMATION ORIGINATOR : HSCA FROM HSCA TO AG TITLE : DATE: 12/20/77 PAGES : 19 SUBJECTS : 12/20/77 REQUEST H. L. LEE, R. D. RACKLEFE, ETAL DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED RESTRICTIONS : 3 CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/27/99 OPENING CRITERIA : INDEFINITE COMMENTS : INC FOLDER, LET, MEMO --- ## Page 3 1 - Legal Counsel Division (Attn: Mr. Coulson, 2- Mr. G. J. Foster J. T. Aldhizer 1 - Mr. February int, 1978 Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch Director, FBI HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE UN ASSASSINATIONS U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA) Reference is made to letter to the Attorney General Irom G. Robert blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, HSCA, dated December 16, 1977, requesting access to material in the files of the FEI pertinent to the John F. Kennedy assassination investiga- tion. Additionally, reference is made to letter to the Attorney General from the Director, Fbl, dated February 3, 1978, which responded in part to this request. Enclosed are an original and two copies of a memorandum which responds to the above request and advises that the material is available for HSCA access at F BI Headquarters. Enclosures - 3 62-117290 JSG: cfb (7) NOTE: The HSCA has requested access to 17 enumerated items relative to the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Our response of 2/3/78. advised that material regarding four anti-Castro groups has been prepared for HSCA access. This response advises that the remainder of the material has been compiled and is available for HSCA access, subject to the usual excisions and deletions. Where Information is not provided, it is either not retrievable from Head- quarters files or is not being produced pursuant to the Memorandum. of Understanding. Additionally, this respond to the HSCA's letter of 12/20/77 requesting that retired Assistant Director, Alex Rosen, be made available for interview. This has been coordinated win Legal Counsel Division, --- ## Page 4 1 - Legal Counsel Division (Attn: D. O. Coulson) P- Mr. G. j. Foster . - Mr. J. T. Aldhizer 1 - Mr. J. S. Giaquinto February 14, 1978 HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS U. 8. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA) Reference is made to letter to the Attorney General from G. Robert Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, HSCA, dated December 16, 1977, requesting access to material in the flles of the FBI pertinent to the John F. Kennedy assassination Investigation. Additionally, refereace is made to letter to the Attorney General from the Director, FBI, dated February 3, 1978, which responded in part to this request. Retrievable information in FBI Headquarters files regard- ing the 13 named Individuals in referenced request has been prepared for the Committee's access, subject to the usual excisions and dele- tions. Where Information is not provided, it is elther not retrievable from Headquarters files or la not being produced pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding. It is noted that the requested matertal regarding the four anti-Castro groups was responded to in our referenced letter of February 3, 1918. This serves as written confirmation of a conversation of January 6, 1978, between Mr. A. Purdy of the HSCA and Special Agent Drew Clark, wherein Mr. Purdy was advised that retired Special Agent James W. Anderton was avallable for interview by the Committee. Additionally, by letter dated December 20, 1977, the HSCA requested retired Assistant Director Alex Rosen be made avall- able for Intervlew. Rosen has been cleared from his employment agreement and is avallable for interview as needed by the ESCA, Arrangementa for Interview can be made through contact with 62-117290 SEE NOTE PAGE 2 JSG:cib (8) --- ## Page 5 House Select Committee on Assassinations U. 8. House of Representatives (H8CA) representatives of the Legal Liaison and Congressional Affairs Unit and the Congressional Inquiry Unit, FBl Beadquarters. By FBI memorandum dated February &, 1978, the HSCA was advised that other Agents named in the letter of December 20, L977, have been similarly cleared and are avallable for HSCA Interview. ORIGINAL AND TWO SENT TO ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, CRIMINAL DIVISION, ATTENTION: MR. ROBERT L. KEUCH NOTE: See Director, FBI, letter to Assistant Attorney Caneral, Criminal Division, Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch, dated 2/14/78, captioned as above. --- ## Page 6 1- Legal Cou CO DiVision Mr. G. J. Foster February 8, 1978 Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch Director, FBI HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA) Reference is made to letters to the Attorney General from G. Robert Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, HSCA, dated December 20, 1977, January 5, 1978, January 19, 1978, and January 20, 1978, which, in connection with the HSCA's investigation into the assassination or i Martin Luther King, Jr., requested that several Agents of the FBI be made available for interview by the HSCA. Reference is also made to letter to the Attorney General from Mr. Blakey, dated January 17, 1978, which, in connection with the HSCA's investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, requested that former Special Agent Ivor Ellis Nitschke be made avallable for interview by the ESCA. Enclosed are an original and one copy of a memorandum in response to the above requests. It is requested that you furnish a copy of the enclosed memorandum to the HSCA. Enclosures - 2 62-117290 JTA :1fj (5) NOTE: By memorandum dated 2/1/78, the current offices of assignment and/or last known addresses of Agents and former Agents, except Ahearn and Sheets, listed in the five HSCA letters were set forth and approval was obtained to clear them from their employment agreements and to contact them regarding inter- view by HSCA. Ahearn and Sheets were previously cleared by memo- randum dated 10/25/77. NOTE CONTINUED PAGE 2 --- ## Page 7 Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch NOTE CONTINUED: Arrangements for these interviews are handled informally by representatives of the Legal Liaison and Congressional Affairs Unit and the Congressional Inquiry Unit of FBI Headquarters. This letter and memorandum completes our response to all five above-mentioned requests of the HSCA. - 2 - --- ## Page 8 1 - Legal Counsel Division (Attn: Mr. Coulson) - Mr. G. J. Foster February 8, 1978 HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA) Reference Is made to letters to the Attorney General from G. Robert Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, HSCA, dated December 20, 1977, January 5, 1978, January 19, 1978, and January 20, 1978, which, in connection with the HSCA's investigation Into the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., requested that several Agents of the FBI be made avallable for interview by the HSCA. Reference is also made to letter to the Attorney General from Mr. Blakey, dated January 17, 1978, which, in connection with the HSCA's investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, requested that former Special Agent Ivor Ellis Nitschke be made avallable for intervlew by the ESCA. This memorandum is to confirm that Agents and former Agents of the FBI, listed in the above HSCA letters, have been cleared from their employment agreements and are avallable for interview as needed by the HSCA. Arrangements for interview can be made through contact with representatives of the Legal Liaison and Congressional Affairs Unit and the Congressional Inquiry Unit of FBI Headquarters. 62-117290 ORIGINAL AN ON, ENTERTON: MAN PORTONE. GENERAL, JTA :1fj (5) NOTE: See leiter to sistant At me earal, Gim a piviela --- ## Page 9 LOUIS STOKES, OHIO, CHAIRMAN RICHARDSON PREYER, N.C. SAMUEL L INE, OHIO WALTER E. FAUNTROY, D.C. DIANANY KINNEY, CONN. YVONNE BHATHIVAITE DURKE, CALIF. CHARLE'S TradE, NEBR. CHPISTOPHER J, DODD, CONN. MAROLD S. SAWYER, MICH. MAROLD C. FORD, TENN. FLOYD J. FITHIAN, IND. ROBERT W. EDGAR, PA. (202) 223-4624 deshagen Select Committee on Assassinations U.S. House of Representatibes 3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 January 5, 1978 far 10 240 fm 1928 The Honorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20530 Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch Deputy Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division, Room 2113 Dear Mr. Attorney General: In connection with the investigation by this Committee into the death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., it is re- quested that the F.B.I. make available for interview, on a priority basis, the following agents: 1. Theodore A 'Hearn - LoS Angeles 2. Leroy W. Sheets - Los Angeles / 10/ 467 cla Thomas J. Wilson - Atlanta 4. Gerald Galbreath - El Paso The Committee is ready to interview these agents on an immediate basis. Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, G. Robert Blakey Chief. Counsel and Director CC: Danny O. Coulson GRB: wwd --- ## Page 10 LOUIS STOKES, ONIO, CHAIRMAN RICHAROSON PREYER, N.C. AMUEL L. DEVINE, OMI WALTER E. FAUYTROY, D.C. STEWAR ANEY, CON YVONNE BRATHWAITE BURKE, CALIP. CHARLES CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, CONN. MAROLD E. FORD, TENN. FLOYD J, PITHIAN, IND. ROBERT W. KOGAR, PA. Rec. (202) 225-4824 Select Committee on Assassinations U.S. House of Representatives 3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 January 19, 1978 Jan: 24.3:448M1978 2:15pm 1/25/5 Althoge The Honorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20530 Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch Deputy Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division, Room 2113 Dear Mr, Attorney General: In connection with the investigation by this Committee into the death of Dr. Martin Luther King, JI., it is re- quested that the Federal Bureau of Investigation make avail- able for interview Special Agent Cole Geary of the Birming- ham Field Office. It is requested that arrangements for such an interview be made within the next two weeks. Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Respectfully, 1. Nobes Blokay G. Robert Blakey Chief Counsel and Director GRB: med CC: Danny 0. Coulson --- ## Page 11 1 LOUIS STOKES, ONIO, CHAIRMAN RICHARDSON PREYER, N.C. SAMUEL L. DEVINE, OHIO WALTER E: FAUNTROY, D.C. STEWART B. MC KINNEY, CONN YVONNE BRATHWASTE BURKE, CALIF. CHARLES THO ABA. CHRISTOPHER J, DOJO, CONN. MAROLD 5. S MICH. MAROLD E. FORD, TENN. FLOYD J. PITHIAN, IND. ROBERT W. KOGAR, PA. (202) 225-4624 Received Office y Conguscional Affai Jari: 24 12:31 PM 1978 Select Committee on Ass. Sinations U.5. House of Representatives 3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING. ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 JAN 2 0 1978 Kee. CiU 2:15Pmm 1/25/8 Alchagen The Honorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch Deputy Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division, Room 2113 Dear Mr. Attorney General: In connection with the investigation by this Committee into the death of DI. Martin Luther King, Jr., it is requested that the FBI make available for interviews, the following agents: Richard S. Clark Dennis LeMaster Russell Jean Gray, Jr. Douglas G. Bills The Committee is ready to interview these agents on priority basis, therefore your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, 2. Nott Blaby G. Robert Blakey• Chief Counsel and Director GRB: ghj CC : Mr. Danny O. Coulson --- ## Page 12 1. н.с. nor. D.c DOOO, COMA AR, PA. (702) 225-16 Kind offu Select Committee on Assassinations E.S5. Ibouse of Bepresentatibes 3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 January 17, 1978 Уідин Jon. 18 2.28 P 1978 The Honorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20530 Attention: Robert L. Keuch Deputy Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division, Room 2113 Dear Mr. Attorney General: In connection with its investigation into the circum- stances surrounding the death of President Kennedy, the Select Committee on Assassinations would like to interview former P.B.I. agent I. E. Nitschke. The Committee, therefore, re- quests that the F.B.I. advise the Committee of Mr. Nitschke's last known location and that the F.B.I. release Mr. Nitschke from his employment agreement. The Committee is in possession of the following identi- fying information with respect to Mr. Nitschke: Name: I. E. Nitschke Last Known Address: 559 Focis Street Metairie, Louisiana Last Known Employment: Chief of Security NASA Installation. Michoud, Louisiana F.B.I. Service: Prior to 1961; believed to have been assigned to Butte, Montana prior to 1955. Known Associates: Guy Bannister If at aif possible, the Committee would like to have this information and the appropriate employment agreement waiver by January 23, 1978. --- ## Page 13 The Honorable Griffin B. Bell January 17, 1978 Page 2 This letter confirms the oral request made by Ms. Hess on December 16, 1978. Thank you for your continuing cooperation. Respectfully, 22. Nobes Slalong G. Robert Blakey Chief Counsel and Director GRB: Jhd Cc: Danny 0. Coulson --- ## Page 14 The Director 2/14/78 -Mr. H. N. Bassett Mr. G. J. Foster 1 - Mr. Mintz 2 - Mr - Hotis Legal Counsel HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS (HSCA) PURPOSE: To request the release of former Assistant Director Alex Rosen from his employment agreement in order that he may be interviewed by captioned Committee. DETAILS: To date, staff attorneys of the RSCA have conducted a number of interviews of Special Agents and former Special in connection with the Cormittee's investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. The HSCA requested that former Assistant Director Rosen be interviewed. Through records of the Admin- istrative Services Division it has been determined that Rosen resides at 55 Fir Hill Towers, North, Akron, Ohio. If approved, Rosen will be telephonically advised by the Legal Liaison and Congressional Affairs Unit, Legal Counsel Division, and the Congressional Inquiry Unit, Records Management Division, of the interest of the Cormittee and, prior to interview, a Legal Counsel representative will provide Rosen with interview. a briefing as to the scope and limitations of the RECOMMENDATION: That the Director release former Assistant Director Rosen from his employment agreement to be interviewed by staff personnel of captioned Committee. 1 - Personnel file Alex Rosen DOC/JTA:1fj/ldr (7) --- ## Page 15 The Associate Director Legal Counsel 2/1/78 1 - /ir. Bassett I7- 7r. Foster 1 - 2r. Nintz 2 - ir. Hotis HOUSE BRINCT CONNINTED ON ASSASSINATIONS (ROCA) PURPOSE: The purpose of this memorandun is to request the release of certain Special Agents from their employment agreement in order that they may be interviewed by captioned Committee. DETAILS: To date, staif attorneys of the HiSCA have conducted a number of interviews of Special Agents anu former Special Agents in connection with the Committee's Investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther KInS. Jr. Additional requests for agent interviews have been subritted by letters to the Attorney General from G. Robert Blakey, Chief Counsel and Director, ESCA. These agents, their offices of assignment or last known address, the date of interview request and the case involved are as follows: Agent Office of Assignment or. Last Known Address Date of Request 12/20/77 Case Involved King 3 Marry L. Lee (Former) Richard D. Rackleft Atlanta Office James R. Riordan niew Haven Office Thomas J. Wilson Cleveland Office DOC/JTA/533 (17) CONTINUED - CV22 1 . Personnel file of Kerry L. Ice 1. Personnel file of Richard D. Rackleft 1 • Personnel file of James N. Plorrian ] Personnel file of thomas J. Wilson 1 Personnel file of Gerald D. Caloreatn 1 Personnel ille of Coloman D. Geary IIT Personnel f.le of Iver niiis hitschke ] 1 Personnel file of Nichard S. Clark: Personnel 11le of Dennis C. Levaster • Personnel file of Ruanell Joan Gray. Jr. 1 Personnel file of Douclas G. Bills 12/20/77 King 12/20/77 King 1/5/78 Kins --- ## Page 16 3 Tenorandm. 80 The associaos Director ne : :000 Acent Uffice of Assimment or west Anoin Acoress Geraid C. Galoreatn Houston Office Colchan D. Geary III Birminchar Office Ivor Silis witschke Travel Loûge Lotel (Former) Anarillo, Texas (1971) Richard S. Plan: Legat: Loncon Dennis C. Levaster (Former) Russell Jean Gray: Jr. FOREO Douglas G. Bills (Former) Date of request 1/5/70 1/19/76 1/19/75 Case Involved King King Kennedy 1/20/78 1/20/78 Kins KinG 1/20/70 1/20/78 King King I approved, tue above agents will be telephonically advised or che Legal Liaison and Congressional Afrairs Unit: ical Coucel Division; anu Congressional Inquiry Unit, Records management division, of the interest of the Committee and, prior to intervier: counsel representatives will provide these agents wies o uriefing as to the scope and limitations of the intervious. P20124D492038: (1) That the Director release the Special Agents hamed in the attached lotter fron their employment agreement to be intervieved by staff personnel of captioned Committee. --- ## Page 17 Viemorandum to The Associate Director ISCA (2) That the legal Counsel Division make appropriate notification to current employees regarding this matter. Management (3) That the Congressional Inquiry Unit, Records Division, make appropriate notification to former employees regaraing tnis matter. --- ## Page 18 LOUIS STOKES, ONIO, CHAIRMAI RICHARDSON PREYER, N.C WALTEH E. FAUNTROY, D.C. YVONER ANATMNNITE BURKE. CALIF CHRISTOPHER J. DOOD, CONN. HAROLD E. FOND. TEAN. STEWART B. MORNINEY: COIN CHARLES THONE, INIRAL MARGLOOMY CENSONAL Select Committee on Assassinations AFFAIRS (202) 225-4620ec 21 9.19 AM 1977 U.S. Mouse of Representatibes 3331 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, ANNEX 2 original to file. WASHINGTON. D.C, 20515 COPY ĐSC 2. 0 1977 dethings The Honorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Attention: Mr. Robert L. Keuch Deputy Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division, Room 2113 Dear Mr. Attorney General: In connection with the investigation by this Committee into the death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., it is requested that the FBI make available for interview the following agents who were assigned to the Atlanta field office in 1968: Harry L. Lee Richard D. Rackleff 33. James R. Riordan In addition, the staff requests your assistance in arrang- ing the availability for interview of Al Rosen, formerly Assistant Director of the FBI under the late J. Edgar Hoover. We understand that Mr. Rosen has recently retired. Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, 22. Nobes Blahe G. Robert. Blakey Chief Counsel and Director GRB : mek CC: Danny 0. Coulson --- ## Page 19 LOUIS STOKES, DINO, CHAIRNIAN A:0HA/u0:N PRETEN, N.C. SAM:: L. I. MALTEP T TOP. A HATE DJOKE. CALIE PIRULO L. 201S. 1,0m TS HARE CUMYRESBIONAL AFFAIRS Sclect Committer on Ascassinations (232) 225028E6 21 9 1970.1977 We. Mouse of BiopecSentatives 3331 HOUSE OFFICE FUILDING. ANNEX 2 WASHINSTON, D.C. 20515 ĐSG 20 277 Alchezer The Honorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General of the United States. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Attention: Mi. Robert L. Keuch Deputy Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division, Room 2113 Dear Mr. Attorney General: In connection with the investigation by this Committee into the death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., it is requestea that the FBI make available for interview the who were assigned to the Atlanta following agents field office in 1968: 1. Harry I. Lee 2. Richard D. Rackleff 3.. James R. Riordan In addition, the staff requests your assistance in arrang- ing the availability for interview of Al Rosen, formerly Assistant Director of the FBI under the late J. Edgar Hoover. We understand that Mr. Rosen has recently retired. Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Very truly Yours, 12. Notes Blahng G. Robert. Blakey Chief Counsel and Director GRB :nek ec: Danny O. Coulson ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10071-10151.pdf
104-10071-10151
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
1/4/67
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
JMWAVE
CABLE: ARREST, KEY WEST OF MASFERRER, GEORGES.
3
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK15 : F13 : 1993.07.30.17:58:29:680059 :
3
## Page 1 104-10071-10151₴ SECRET CARLITE GITE DUVAVE 15G NO NIOCT 16-8 DYVIR PORTE :203 3P SUPPLENaNTS PEF INFO. ARRESTED AND HELD CY MOST HOT? SOCIG RECOONIZANCE 01=704. ERECFAT VER BAPTISTI ROBERT, (CULONEL RENE AGraS, in Florida MARTIN FO CASEY. SOLAUSE FIND "HELD UNDER $S9R? SURETY for attesptal BONS. TRY OTUERS KELD UNDER SOSHAGON, HELD AI DODE COUNTY invasion of JAIL MIANO INDER 559A SUDDeNTENCE BOND WAS ANTONIO MONAS. Haiti d "FIFTY DADE MELA DE RECOGNIZANCE BOND OF SERG. STAIRE EO BE AYERICALS MERE BARMAN AND DACT GLY AILEY WEST AND EDALAFLACINE KILD OT MIAMI. MEATINE CEROPE LOGO CUMNISSIONET CONNENC & JANUARNARgIES HAS ACID CONTINUANCE. NO DEN DATE TO MFAUDS HAS STAIED ME PLAS PROSSCITE SAUF FOR VIOLATION OF MINITIONS CONTROL • ACTO MAXIMIN PEWALTY TYO YEARS II 6iO 539,202 FINE. SECRET over? 4 form 67 308-9-1k 8645 UME GARD REPRODUCTIO --- ## Page 2 14-00000 PAGE E INADAPON SECRET SLE TOR PAROLE A SATING FRON LXTORATTON ACTION PH ST AGAINST NIT.. S. SIZEABLE STOCK OF VEAPONS AND MUNITIONS SUFISCATED BY GUSTOLE ON BOARD - "DON AiD IN HOUSE, INCLUDED WERE iZ HORTARS 69 MN AÜD 8I NM, 2 POCKET LALICHERS 3.5 INCH, 7. MACHINE GUNS SO CALIBER, 7 MACHINE GUNS 39 CALIBER, & BREN SO 1A SUARACHINE GUNS, ABOUT 140 RIFLES AND CARBINES, OVER STU BAYDiCIS AND KNIVES, 18 PISTOLS, ONE WALKIE TALKI:, 1 EMPTY 179 LB. 3013 CASING AND 1 EMPTY SO LB. BOMB CASING, & OUTSOARD MOTORS, I SHALL AND I LARCE RUBBER BOAT, MISCEL - LANED!IS MES EQUIPMENT AND ACCRSSOFIES FOR WIAPONS, OVER 197,737 ROHINDS AlTO. ALSO SEIZED WERE S7 BUICK SKYLARK VIT GEN JERSEY PLATES. 66 FALCON WITH FLORIDA PLATES, TVO AND ONE HALF TON TRUCK GUC HITH NEW SEASEY PEADOSROTOR VESSEL CLON 916 CITED JHAVE 4218 HAS SRIZED AT BERTH IN MIAMI. PES POUNDS OF COA EXPLOSIVE MUSCUE ITS MEDANS. : 4. TRICULOAD OF EXPLOSIVIE SIR"D EY MODE COUNTY SHERIFF OU 31 DECENDER 66 P: THIC: "ITH FLAT TIRE CHEC:ES --- ## Page 3 14-0000g PAGE S UNNAVE 4987 SEC!:I SACHET ON HISHUAY, EXPLOSIVES SELDIDEO TO MASFERRER GROUP, "EXC DEINS • TRANSPORIED TO FLORIDA YEYS FOR DISTRIBUTION® SO AMTASSADORS MAY BE BHIEFED DE INFO PARAS I THRU 4. 6. NOFACT INFO ONLY, STATIO: CHECHING SEPIAL WUMBERS OF VARIO'IS MEAPONS SEIZED. OUTAJAR) "OTORS CITED PARA S MERE OF SILENT TYPE LISED EXTENSIVTLY ! OF CT SINCE SI. MANY LOST ON OPERATIDS INCLIDIUS BAY OF PIGS. SERIAL MBERS S-21 AND S-IS ARE MEANINGLISS TO CUTTIT MAVE STATION. APPEARS LARGE BUTSER POOT 15 79-1 93 39-9.9 TYPE USSO 3Y JAWAVE. IOWEVER MANY OF TIGE ALSO LUST IN VARIOUS INDER- TAKINTS iI C' SI, STATION ALTO TACIT ALL PERSONS ARRESTED. WILL ADVISE ANY TICUIFICAT SILIS. SE C PET BT ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10074-10167.pdf
104-10074-10167
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
9/11/74
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
PLANNING OF COUP AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT OF THE BAHAMAS
6
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK16 : F62 : 1993.07.17.09:53:13:370480 : ATTACHMENTS MIM-00-A-(S)-3227
6
## Page 1 1104-0074-0167) OFFICE RATE OPENE! DATE CLOSED CONFIDENTIAL (then filled In) DCD CASE CHRONICLE ACTIVATION AND CLOSURE DATE OPENED -Sun dATE CLOSED Cano d 11901 DETROIT OFFICE MPLS PHIL PITT OFFICE LOUIS DATE CLOSED iS THACUSE WASH GENERAL CLOSURE INITIATOR REQUIREMENTS NUMBER (If Any) NUMBER (TY any) HUN 2,6S Раму Виче 3,54402 X:4489 X3128 (bin) MONTHLY REVIEW REMARKS Closed- 5 Feb 14 0970' --- ## Page 2 14-00000 : Planning of Coup Against the Government of the Bahamas DOMESTIC COLLECTION DIVISION upport Branch/Operational Support Section -per 900, Ker Buezdine - oxe. 2308 Case 61401 11 September 1974 03 WH/7/CAR • ATTN: 3 B 0001 Hos. 03 Attached for your information is a copy of MIM-00-A(S)-322/ 26415-74. E-2 IMPDET CL BY 007622 0910 --- ## Page 3 00000-tL CONFIDENTIAL (when filled in) DE SERTE NUMBER 10/87 1819|20 22 23 24 25 20 169409 Planning of Coup Against the Government of the Bahamas INDINDUAL NO Joseph Merola Gordon: Cooper and Associates Opa-Locka, Florida IGANIZATION NO: SOURCE (Nome. Title, Organizotion, Address) INDIVIQUAL NOS - Same as above OAEANIGAUION NO 27 28 20 80 31 3233 40/41 42| PROCESSING 8. COMBINED WITH ORGANIZATION NO. REQUESTED FROM COLLZGTION INTERVIEW TRIP REPORT OTHER DOCUMENT SUp 50V DIRECTED TO OTHER (specity below) CASE OFFICER SPRyan FiELD COMMENTS A) Re Watts/Bem telecon, 10 September 1974. 3) The meeting took place the morning of 7 September 1974 in Miami. Joe Merola telephoned Matt MacVane at his home on 7 September 1974 to pass on this informa- tion. The telecon was unsolicited by MacVane, who no longer contacts Merola per DCD Headquarters Instructions. Com Robinson flew In from Nassau to meet with Joe Merola and Mike Yamanis (Yamants 1s apparently from Ft. Lauderdale and 11ke Merola he has close ties to arns dealers and mercenarles). Robinson plans to meet again with Merola and Yamanis after com- plete financial details have been worked out in Hassau. Filed: 101900Z 03 TGAOUUARTEHS COMMENTS Process sheet and report typed in OSS. (MIAMI TWX 12584) Manios 0001 CASE OFFICER VIMAGINOS °3 /. RY 007822 EX-Z IMP. DET. DIVISION/STAFF. DE 097° 3 --- ## Page 4 14-00000 CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL DIRECTORATE OF EPEHATONS COUNTRY SUBJECT Bahamas Planning of Coup Against the Government of the Bahamas REPORT NO. 0O-A(S)•322/26415-74 DATE 11 September 1974 NO. PAGES REFERENCES Case 61401 DOMESTIC COLLECTION DIVISION OPERATIONAL INFORMATION REPORT This report is believed to contain information of operational interest and may not be disclosed to personnel the Directorate of Operations without the prior permission of the Domestic Collection Division. SOURCE U.S. citizen, convicted arms dealer who maintains close ties to known underworld figures. 1: Com (Robinson), a black Bahamian who resides in Nassau, Bahamas, recently has made foreign enquiries into the possibility of hiring armed mercenaries to be used in an attempt to overthrow the Government of Prime Minister Lyndon 0. (Pindling). During a meeting with non-Bahamians, who have close ties with foreign arms dealers, that took place outside of the Bahamas Robinson stated that he represents elements of the Bay Street merchants of Nassau, and that funds are available for action against the Bahaman Government. According to Robinson, his group is looking equipping, and execution a coup against the Government. who are in sympathy with his planned course of action, and that after full details are worked out and the required funds are set aside, he will convene another meeting with the foreigners in order to finalize the appropriate arrangements. 09703 --- ## Page 5 14-00000 CUNFIULWNM DUNFID BEN TRIAL IBISPER SEP TA LITEL CITE DRO/MIANT 12584 PETORITY DOD /WASHINGTON ATTRA SUPPORT BRANCHLOSS (UATTS/RYAN) INTEL REPORT SOURCES JOSEPH SEROLA, GORDON COOPER AND ASSOCIATES, OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA: FILED A 10190r2 REPOPT CLASS CONFIDENTIAL COUVTRY SAHAMAS SAKAYAS FIELD NO. XMIY DOA6S 322/26415574 PLANNING OF COUP ABAINST THE COVTRNMENT OF THE 1.?. CITIZZY, CONVICTEC DAMS DEALER UHO MAINTAINS CLOSE TIES KWYN 'DERWORLD FIGURES. 30' RECENTLY NAS HOTLY MAY MAT AGREE MENSHES ESTO TA OSSET FOREIGN FINITRIES INTO THE POSSIBILITY ARMED VERCEMARIES TO ATTEMPT TO OVERTHIAW TA GO HEYT OF PRITE MINISTER LYSDOM O. "SETING (PINDLING).. DIRITS WITH NON-SAHANIS, n?49 THAT PLACE HAVE CLOSE TIES WITH FOREIG' DEALERO, THAT TOOY CUT SIDE T NE. RAidAlAS ROBINSON HE PEERCSEITS FLEMENTE 25 THE BOY STREET YERCHANT? MASSAU, AND THAT FUNDS ARE AVAILAPLE FOR ACTIO: AGAINIT FANAVIAY GOVERNMENT. DORINSON, HIS GRO!P IF LOOKING FOR FOREIGN ASSISTA ICE IN THE PLAWIG, EXECUTION OF COMP AGAINST ThE GOVERNMENT. HE CHIP THAT THER" AFE MANY BAHAMIANS WHO ARE IN SYMPATHY WITH MIS PLANNED 1952 OF ACT10%, AiD THeT AFIO? FILL RETAILS ARE WORKED OUT THE REQUIRED FINDS ARE SET HE WILL WITH THE FORELJNERS ARRANGEMENTS. CODE TO TYIAL CO THE CONVENF. ANOTHER END OF REPORT 1÷74. FIELD COMMENTSE 17) MEETING 1971 (A) TOOM. RE WATTS/DEM TELECOND IN SEPTEMUTY PLACE THE MORNING JOE MEROLA TELEPHOVSD MATT SPTINBEE 1974 ТО РАЗЕ ON ТИIТ "O% POLICITED DY NO LOCAR CONTACTS MF 10L4 PER DOU HEADQUANTERS IN TRUCTIONI NGRY NGON FLEW IN FROM NA!! TO MEET KITH JOE MEROLA LIK AYATANIS APPARSATLY F309 FT, LA DERDaLE NTROLA HAG CLOSE TES TO ARMS DCALLAS AND pain Nood TO MEET AGAIN WITH CROLA 514n LICIAL DETAILS NAVE ASEN 0990" --- ## Page 6 14-00000 1. BAYAYS, RECENTLY COR CORLESENT LA CARE SAMANTA QUO RESIDES, IN HA550 oF POSSINTLITY HIRING ARMEO MENCENARIES TO BE !SED IN. AN THE GOVERNMENT OF PRIME MINISTER LYNDON ATTEN TOL OVERTHROW (PINDLING) .: DERING MEETING WITH NON-SAHAMIANS, VIIO HAVE CLOSE TIES WITH FOREIGN ARMS DEALERS THAT TOOK PLACE OUTSIDE OF THE BAHAMAS ROBINSON STATED THAT HE REPRESEHTS ELEMENTS OF THE BAY STREET MERCHANTS OF NASSAUS AND THAT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR ACTION AGAINST THE BANANAN SOVERNMENT ACCORDING TO POBINSON, HIS 13 GRO!P LOOKING FOR FORETON ASSISTANCE IN TUE PLANNING BALBRYNA AND-EXECUTION:OF AP COUP AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT SAID THAT THERE ARE MANY RAKAMIANS UHC ARE IN SYMPATH! WITH KIS PLANNED COURSE OF ACTION, AND THAT AFTER FULL DETAILS ARE WORKED OuT ANTING SECURE FORCE NERS IN ORDER TO VALIZE THE NEE VITH THE FOREIGNERS IN ORDER AIRPROFRIATE ARRANGEMENTS. •END OF REPORT 218 FIELD COMNENTS'! 1974- (A). RE WATTS/SEN TELECON, 19 SEPTEMBER B)S THE MEETING TOOK PLACE THE MORNING OF 7 SEPTEMBER 1974F IN MIAMI® JOE MEROLA TELEPHONED MATT MA VANE AT HIS HOMEON 7, SEPTEMBER 1974: TO PASS 0M THIS INFORMATION. THE TELECON WAS UNSOLICITED BY HACVARE" *HO NOP LONGER CONTACTS MEROLA PER DOD HEADOUARTERS INSTRUCTIONS COM ROBINSON FLEW IN FROM NASSA!! TO MEET wITH AND MIKE MAMANIS YAMANIS IS APPARENTLY FROM TO LAIDERD • LAUDERDALE AND LIKE FEROLA HE HAS CLOSE TIES TO ARUS DEALERS AND MERCENARIEST. POSINSON. PLANS TO MEET AGAIN WITH YEROLA AND *YAMANIS AFTER COMPLETE FINANCIAL DETAILS HAVE BEEN WORKED OUT IN NASSAU• A 13 PREPARE TYPLE COPY "HAT F? IMPDET 09704 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32287857.pdf
124-10198-10133
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
11/21/1966
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
92-3171-1907
DIRECTOR, FBI
ROEMER, WILLIAM F. JR.
14
FBI
HQ
3/7/18
14
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Date: 5/7/2015 Agency Information AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER: 124-10198-10133 RECORD SERIES: HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 92-3171-1907 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: ROEMER, WILLIAM F. JR. TO : DIRECTOR, FBI TITLE : DATE : 'PAGES: SUBJECTS : 11/21/1966 14 SGI, ACT, ASSOC, OC, NEG DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified RESTRICTIONS : 4. CURRENT STATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 04/03/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS: v9.1 DocId: 32287857 Page 1 166 --- ## Page 2 FD-9a3 (Fier. 5-1-511 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION E REPORTING OFFICE CHICAGO TITLE OF CASE OFFICE OF ORIGIN CHICAGO SAMUEL M. GIANCANA, aka DATE 11/21/66 REPORT MADE BY WILLIAM F. ROEMER, CHARACTER OF CASE INVESTIGATIVE PERIOD 9/20 - 11/15/66 JR ..AR •I TYPED BY REFERENCE: Report of SA WILLIAM F. ROEMER, JR., dated 9/27/66 at Chicago. !d ,25 ENCLOSURES TO BUREAU (2) characterization of peormant letterhead membe al iwo (2) copies of a letterhead memorandum setting characterization of informants utilized in instant report. J - 11-82 forth LEAD 6353 VeT/AG CHICAGO AT CHICAGO, ILLINOIS Will continue to 1121-86 ollow and report the activities Of GIANCANA / Fending over one year - yes; pending prosecution over 6 months - no. SPECIAL AGEN APPROVED COPIES MADE: 3, - Burea X v4 N CHARGE DO NOT WRITE IN SPACES BELOW (92-3171) (Ener 92-3171 (907.2028 1 - USA, Chicago 11 NOV 25 1966 2 - Chicago (92-349) le/asification 9/301 26 140 Dissemination Record of Attached Ribpor Notations Agency CG. -AAGI Criminal Division, Request Recd. Date Fwd. How Fwd. Ormonized. Crime and Racketeering Section, Room 2524. CLASSTI BY EXE. PIFF GOS, CATEGORY I TE OF DECLASSIFICATION INDEFINITE 940* DocId: 32287857 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 CG 92-349 INFORMANTS Source MARY KAY MC ALLISTER 1151 South Wisconsin, Oak Park, Illinois CG T-2 CG 7016-PC CG T-3' FIORE BUCCIERI Berwyn, Illinois (deemed adviseable) CG T-4 CG 6690-C-TE _. CG T-5 CG 6404-C-TE Contacted By On numerous occasions during September, October, November, 1966 by SA WILLIAM F. ROEMER November 14, 1966 by SAS JOHN R. BASSETT and WILLIAM F. ROEMER November 1, 1966 to SA LENARD A. WOLF CG T-6 CV 654 CG T-7 NY 5642-C-TE CG T-8 CG 6588-C-TE CG T-9 CG 6792-C CG T-10 CG 7049-PC CG T-11 CG 6533-C October 11, 1966 by SA LENARD . A. WOLF September 19, 1966 by SAs MERLE B. HAMRE and JOHN J. OITZINGER October 13, 1966 by SA JOHN J.. BARRETT, Cleveland Office August 30, 1966 by SA THOMAS L. COLARELLI, New York OIIICe October 20, 1966 by SA RUSSELL R. GIRSCH August 26, 1966 by SA DENNIS W. SHANAHAN October 19, 1966 by SAs FRANK J. FORD and MERLE B. HAVRE October 20, 1966 to SA MAX R. FRITSCHEL - B.- COVER PAGE SEAR n8102 DocId: 32287857 Page 3 --- ## Page 4 CG 92-349 Source CG T-12 CG 6786-PC CG T-13 Attorney RAFAEL HERNANDEZ OCHOA, Assistant Secretary of Contaçted By November 2, 1966 to SATRUBE LE MARONE AU) Actober 6, 1966 COVER PAGE DocId: 32287857 Page 4 --- ## Page 5 Fp. 201, (Rev. 3p99) UN_ ED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ...STICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Copy to: 1 - USA, Chicago SECRE SEE REVERSE Report of: Date: SA WILLIAM F. ROEMER, JR. E FOR Office: Chicago 11/21/66 JEVICATLON Field Office File #: CG 92-349 Bureau File #: 92-3 Title: Character: Synopsis: SAMUEL M. GIANCANA ALE MENRMATION CORTANCED CC0ne Ein there Signa 40.384 "r': ANTI-RACKETEERING Although daughters of GIANCANA continue to reside at 1147 South Wenonah, Oak Park, Illinois, GIANCANA has not been observed there or anywhere else in Chicago rea auring september, October and November, 1966. In August, 1966, GIANCANA known to be in Guatemala City, Guatemala and on *10/26/66 the Mexican Government was advised by an attorney for GIANCANA that GIANCANA (US is interested in applying for immigrant status in Mexico for permanent residence there. Information obtained indicating possibility GIANCANA no longer active leader of organized crime in Chicago area. Information received indicating GIANCANA has financial interest in Las Vegas casinos, The Dunes, The Tropicana, and The Stardust. Negative investigation to determine current whereabouts of GIANCANA set out herein. received indicating possibilityfofmeeting-.of.leaders of organized crime throughout United.states-including-.m...as GIANCANA to be held in Los Angeles area intlate October. 1966, no information developed conf truing) that sucki meeting ever took place. XS(4) _P- CLASS REASON-I DATA OF 16323V IM IT 181412 11022 4.198 Cleositte Declassify 5206649 SECRET This document contatns neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the fBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are to be distributed outside your agency. ' Caper DocId: 32287857 Page 5 --- ## Page 6 CG 92-349 -CAN I DENNA AMERI SECRET He gave a local Guatemalan address indicating tourist status. He stated that he intended to travel to Argentina and South marist from hate a 1? i pected to return to una united states in October. Mexico CG T-13 an official of the Mexican Government, advised on October 26, 1966, that SAMUEL GIANCANA applied for immigrant status in Mexico, being represented by a reputable Mexican attorney. CG T-13 declined to identify the attorney. The informant also advised that GIANCANA'S request to immigrate • Mexico was accompanied by a similar request concerning a relative of GIANCANA. (5) (49 (44) 7* SARRET 1028.1933 DocId:32287857 Page ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10069-10195.pdf
104-10069-10195
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
7/6/60
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CHIEF, CONTACT DIVISION
CHIEF, NEW YORK OFFICE
US GOVERNMENT OFFICE MEMO RE CONVERSATION WITH ALEXANDER I. RORKE RE CUBA
3
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK14 : F47 : 1993.07.14.19:29:43:180310 : THE 3 PAGES INCLUDES A DUPLICATE 2ND PAGE.
3
## Page 1 1104-10069-10795} IMPO DITTRO STATES GOVERNWENT SORRESS Conver Earing called an ate the cominaloss ily So ta 3 raci of = telephone 0611 fra robert Recoza, i Mvision, to states thot soris mont have inore on of value concertes Cube. 2: Sorta is o tuls o by bis mi adnission ispoomerant germalous. beia share operetir.. reposter and photograper to has worced socti,for the Rationel Broadcazting? Carpeny on assigmentire says he 1ratso stylas to hate = 11urg bri motudine docuentery dins for, beleysion station.cam 12 lewtork- He clafro that he wiüt chorug soch for then a apremer: concerine the raricus coups thick are to Sprosition to Castm. Borke's business address to tac oftico oe als fathes an abtement Biogropale daba concerniss Rorise is being Formaded ó dily 60. •Cardebunn coundriet es a recult o2 ate venitorial vors in Tecaragis, Penava, Coste Rici., 223e Pad other areas,. and be sogs that because de i aced enternet is ane printom of aids can he done duod facto ei Commandan in Cibe, sna 219 main the current inomonter 301e, do mar been keenans in ciose touce with variors Cabor opapattion aroupes, ge in: Lis Caribbean packground ut great loncts sodr concrated be detti his vialto: so Micaragia, Pariare avents the mentined attelut. to recotiat then here Poose dora ali sats bademna merely to tr 2r0ve. ibe sinuation là Cuon end indesatezes tue versouc poposition groupe: Ze ter care to his reel point inici id tat te regards Dues tanz. same be has deen a, treat dead as ravanti, as the most solutiot all tacoc who went to tare actica agaitas Cessro. Re Cople in the Cuben aroy ans otto Caben Organinetiats to can spyss, shed tae rigut tíne comes. Acebrains to Forke, Lony Sellares that, the oarshould be done by Cubens' iron a base outside the way bet lena to beare ard yesmarcost enough 3o Mee. el succestau a tells. Trashes, the necessary ars, and esmaition. Rozze belt: renter, than lenn Lo politically in the drue de the road, is nob motivated by batred and could not bring soon a blood Cubai In chort, laè fools thet lanz would be vita tbe son a it the 14/60274 DO NOT REPRODUCE RETURN TO CA # 08848 --- ## Page 2 14-00000 noina Re con ne instencay 1s too. fan 3 aiszerent greyps: amaito Morte, Tant Lao, e con pet mes beve and cateti eut.: Al the she af teven Lode execta to laterit 124C B94326 ira: Aradon his seraed de bond irithe rignt people: Sonte belsoren Shus this Gora En Norkere ortise be edeirod a falopher cal? Si: Mento to remam 13t : mora 12x0G fine: sacrate forona firi nartue inocaron in. Coufsdonsist Migealna, ¿avide Che dna 29 ca invarrion. Ruzice acaded co lire ertocot 2181 da 15 mag T26220)66 hir. 70: ze Chens t ristacte: 1: 2uo dataila di Rosina: crare. c -second. --- ## Page 3 14-00000 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10213-10027.pdf
104-10213-10027
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
12/10/63
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
PARIS
CABLE: TO DATE, ONLY ITEM MENTIONING PRESIDENT KENNEDY
2
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-48 : F36 : 20040311-1056963 :
2
## Page 1 104-10213-10027* CLA-SIFIED MESSAGE IS SECRET "AULTING 141 • TO 2515- • DIRECTOR FROM & PARIS $1E.=4: Hastie AGTIONI CAHI. R.О. 7 -ü.:: INTO A DEI, D/OCI, DOP, C/C1, fei/sta VR • joto: Il desiractica. •cite reasons and coordicate 10 DEc 63 1N 7 7 1.48 SECRET 100858Z DIR CITE PARI 1833 FE DIR 85133" RY944 GPFLOOR S. TO DATE, ONLY UNPRY ITEM MENTIONING PRESIDENT KENNEDY ASSASSINATION IS BRIEF 27 NOVEMBER EXCHANGE BETWEEN UNLIFT/2 AND 0F GROUP. THEY OBVIOUSLY BEEN STUDYING NEVSPAPER ARTICLE AND PHOTOS RE DALLAS EVENTS. SAID IS THIS THE GUY WHO KILLED HIM (KENNEDY>? WZ ANSWERED "THAT IS OSWALD BUT I DON•T THINK HE IS ONLY ONE INVOLVED. OSWALD SHOT TO DEATH BY RUBY AND LATTER PICKED UP 8Y DALLAS POLICE. KILLING IN USA IS SO EASILY ACCOM PLISHED. " 20 STA CÓNMENT. FRENCH PRESS HAS GIVEN SENSATIONAL COVERAGS TO POSSIBILITY THAI ASSASSINATION WAS MANY-ANGLED PLOT, STRESSING "SECOND MAN IN THE VINDOW". STA INTERPRETS ABOVE AS W/2 BRIEFING C'S COPY 201-289248 SECRET D-200-5 BY OTHER THAN ME ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBTED Copy No 367- -Document Number S-727A --5997 fOr FOIA Review on MAY 1976 --- ## Page 2 CASSITIED MESSAGE ON GONE IN 772$8 JON BASIS PRESS STORIES WE HAS READ. STA WILL CONTINUE UNPRY COVERAGE AND REPORT ANY FURTHER RELATED COMMENTS. 3. NO INDEX. SECRET C/S COMMENTS. * DISSEMINATION APPLICABLE TO RYBAT DYVOLER GAFLOOR. CABLES.:: requested. any information on assassination of President Kennedy. Ethical -25 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10336-10004.pdf
104-10336-10004
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
9/5/97
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
PROJFILES-ARRB REQUESTS
CIA/HRG
ARRB
ARRB REQUEST: CIA-IR-5: POSSIBLE FOREIGN SOURCE FOR RECORDS ON OSWALD
21
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK-M-20 : F5 : 20031120-1015139 :
21
## Page 1 104-10336-10004 FYI United States Department of State Washington, D.C. 20520 April 8, 1997 David Marwell Executive Director Assassination Records Review Board 600 E Street, NW 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20530 ASSASSINATION HE CORDS BEVILV: 604BD- Dear Mr. Marwell: Enclosed is the diplomatic note received from the Mexican government, dated March 12, 1997, which responds to the ARRB's request for any additional documents that the Mexican government might have relating to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy• The, Embassy evidently submitted the request to the Mexican government on June 13, 1996, but did not report the action through telegraphic channels. The reference in the telegram is to our recent query. The Mexican government note conveys copies of the diplomatic notes exchanged between Mexico and the United States in 1963-1964 regarding the initial U.S. request for Mexican documents relevant to the investigation into Lee Harvey Oswald's visit to Mexico in the fall of 1963. Most of these notes were published in volume XVIII of the Warren Commission Report: They also duplicate copies of the same correspondence found in Legal Adviser's and Mexico City post files that are included in State's collection at NARA. enclosed I have stamped copies of pages bearing "confidential" classification markings. I am also enclosing a copy of Mexico City telegram ~ 3078 of March 31. According to my records, we have now received responses from all posts contacted through the A bureau. Minsk remains ongoing. Final responses have been received from Bonn, Paris, London, Moscow, and now Mexico City. been received from from Tokyo and Ottawa. mexto and ottawat Interim responses have As it has been some time since Tokyo reported that the Japanese government would be searching for documents, the ARRB might wish to prepare a followup cable. Sincerely, lena flering Nina J. Noring Department of State Liaison JFK Assassination Records Collection Act Attachments: As indicated. --- ## Page 2 13-00000 ISSINATION REC SECRET Assassination Records Review Board 600 E Street NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20530 (202) 724-0088 • Fax: (202) 724-0457 EVIEW BOAR September 5, 1997 BY COURIER Mr. John Pereira Director Historical Review Group Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Re: Request to CIA to contact| Oswald telephone calls in Mexico City regarding LIENVOY intercepts of Some time ago the Review Board requested informally that CIA contact Jin Mexico City for information related to Lee Harvey Oswald. During your recent visit here we discussed with you the feasibility of your making such contacts. I am writing in response to your request that we memorialize our request and provide some background information. The Review Board believes that all reasonable steps should be taken to account for all telephonic intercepts of Oswald during his visit to Mexico City in September-October 1963. There is evidence that CIA intercepted some telephone calls through an operation named LIENVOY (conductedl, TWe believe that it would be appropriate for CIA to contact directly[ to inquire as to whether the Mexican authorities retained copies of LIENVOY telephonic take, specifically the actual recordings of Oswald's telephone calls to the Soviet Embassy during the period of September 27 through October 3, 1963. The Review Board previously has sought information from the Mexican Government through appropriate diplomatic channels. For reasons that are obvious to those familiar with Mexico City issues, the Review Board could not raise with Mexican officials nor with the U.S. State Department the possible existence of additional tape recordings that might be in the hands of certain officials. Thus, at the behest of the Review Board, the Department of State requested that the Mexican federal government and local government agencies conduct general searches of their files for records related to the assassination of President Kennedy. The Mexican government responded SECRET BOARD MEMBERs: John R. Tunheim, Chair • Henry F. Graff • Kermit L. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR: David G. Marwell --- ## Page 3 13-00000 SECRET Mr. John Pereira September 5, 1997 Page 2 by sending copies of the same documentation and correspondence that the GOM had made available to the Warren Commission in 1964. The basis for our interest in your contacting appropriate Mexican Officials is found in ClA document 104-10004-10199, which was reviewed by the Board on September 19, 1995. On page 5 of this document (not including the cover sheet) information that the Board agreed to protect, due to the sensitivity of sources and methods involved, suggests that the Mexican security forces may have had their own copy of the October 1 intercept on Lee Harvey Oswald. It is unclear whether this statement refers to the transcript or to an actual tape containing the phone call. Nevertheless, it provides enough evidence to warrant additional inquiries on this matter. For your reference we are enclosing copies of the reference documents as well as copies of the correspondence between the DOS and the Mexican government. We would appreciate your contacting appropriate officials to determine what reasonably can be known about this and related matters, and ask that you provide a response to this request by November 14, 1997. We are fully aware of the sensitivity of this type of request and do not wish to take any action that would compromise existing intelligence operations. If necessary, we would be pleased to discuss with you ways in which we might further elaborate on this request, including person-to-person discussions with appropriate officials either here or in Mexico. Thank you for your continued assistance and cooperation. Sincerely yours, Guilenter T. Jeremy Gunn General Counsel and Associate Director for Research and Analysis cc: J. Barry Harrelson, HRG Enclosures SECRET --- ## Page 4 13-00000 Descriptive Name: CIA Request to J. Pereira Descriptive Type: Letter (Class. SECRET) Subject: CIA Request Attachments: CIA Doc. 104-10004-10199, DOS correspondence Blind Copy: Carbon Copy: Barry Harrelson Reference: Classified CIA memos a:lcia-mc.02wpd Document Number: File: 4.20.4 Date Completed: 9/5/97 12:00:00 AM Checked By: Jeremy Gunn Typist: Cathy Rodriguez Author: Irene Marr - --- ## Page 5 13-00000 AGENCY RECORD NUMBER RECORD SERIES AGENCY FILE NUMBER SECRET - ypage only Assassination Records Review Board Final Determination Notification CIA 104-10004-10199 JEK 201-289248 OSW10: V10B 1993.06.14.15:36:06:060000 September 19, 1995 Status of Document: Postponed in Part Number of releases of previously postponed information: 16 Reason for Board Action: The Review Board's decision was premised on several factors including: (a) the significant historical interest in the document in question; (b) the absence of evidence that the release of the information would cause harm to the United States or to any individual. Number of Postponements: 6 Postponement # 1 (Page RS): Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it reveals the identity of an intelligence agent that properly may be withheld under Section 6(1)(A) of the JFK Act. The Board is awaiting additional evidence from the CIA, at which time it will reconsider the postponement. Substitute Language: See Document Date of Next Review: 12/1995 Postponement # (Page (PageRS): Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it reveals the identity of an intelligence agent that properly may be withheld under Section 6(1)(A) of the JFK Act. The Board is awaiting additional evidence from the CIA, at which time it will reconsider the postponement. Substitute Language: See Document Date of Next Review: 12/1995 Postponement # 3 (Page 1): Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it discusses sources and methods that properly may be withheld under Section 6(1)(B) of the JFK Act. •Substitute Language: None: The redacted information contains no substantive information about the assassination of President Kennedy or about Lee Harvey Oswald. Date of Next Review: 2017 SECRET --- ## Page 6 13-00000 Postponement # 4 (Page 2): Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it discusses sources and methods that properly may be withheld under Section 6(1)(B) of the JFK Act. Substitute Language: None: The redacted information contains no substantive information about the assassination of President Kennedy or about Lee Harvey Oswald. Date of Next Review: 2017 Postponement # 5 (Page 5): Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it discusses sources and methods that properly may be withheld under Section 6(1)(B) of the JFK Act Substitute Language: None: The redacted information references "the 1 October intercept on Lee Oswald" and the possible existence of another copy of that "intercept" that was discovered after the assassination. The redacted information contains no other substantive information about the assassination of President Kennedy or about Lee Harvey Oswald. Date of Next Review: 2017 : Postponement # 6 (Page 14): Reason for Board Action: The text is redacted because it discusses sources and methods that properly may be withheld under Section 6(1)(B) of the jFK Act. Substitute Language: None: The redacted information contains no substantive information about the assassination of President Kennedy or about Lee Harvey Oswald. Date of Next Review: 2017 Board Revlew Completed: 08/03/95 --- ## Page 7 13-00000 LET UNCLASSILIEDR SUBJECT: (Optional 213 ris FROM:: NTERNAL BE- USE ONLY ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET EXTENSION LICOOPNATEPEI RESECRET : «CIA HISTORICAL DEMON DOC RELE • TO: (Offor building is deleno c/cr RECEIVED? FORWARDED 10. [SCELSO] 12. 13. avor A610 USE PREVIOUS 1- EOIIONS CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL. USE ONLY AT LA NCLASSIFIED --- ## Page 8 13-00000 "P.4: SECRET and othus senses my bur talen bored os our sort le menin that the Fat my bare mun 10002 chooke sioust Medoms nthettten to men 18 runtiuntion has contiand all the detetle of lio 19119, shere he stayes, wal what he did to eveta cronster 1500a with the fat, dar Mesice Station Minico on 3 October and is no loner there when our mport me jut out. Dinos thie talmphens top operution te the Maccan nita bad the 1 October Intercept on Joe DEMAID, but 1t parently lumbered in theis flim intil the seanination tod 12000. her 3963 When word of the shouting of Irnsident Sunzedo trachal the 0ff100s os our operatina diviatons and starte on the altarzoon el totany de Heven.. bar 1969, translotor tello unre surred ou everyboro to fallou the tre, When the hase of Ise ONALD van huand, the estact mas elastrio. A phone meton fren the ta cue et soont the nam • time, nurina OSHALD SECRET --- ## Page 9 13-00000 TL: 202-647-5094201 P. 003 OUTGOING TELEGRAM PAGE 01 APA 24384217 55 4911. °GG ORIGIN A-08 INFO L0G-00 ARA-BO OASY-BE DIM-gD TEDE-08 L-80 1MIS-02 DSCC-90 DRAFTED BY: 0/ IM/ I S/FPC/PPA: MPGRAFELD APPROVED BY: A: PFKENNEDY MIM/IS: EVILSON• A/IMEGEISELA A/IM/IS/FPC: PSHEILS ARA/MEX: DURS -310619 2321102 /38 R 2321071 APR 96 FM, SEGS TAFE-WASHDC MEHBASSY MEXICO UNCLAS STATE B84217 FOR TUE ANBASSADOR FROM ASSISTANT SECRETARY KENNEDY E.0. 12956: N/A TAGS: AINF SURJECT: JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS COLLEGTION ACT OF 1992 1. THE ASSASSIMATION RECORDS COLLECTION ACT OF 1992 THE "ACT" WAS SIGNED INTO LAW ON OCTOBER 26г 1992. THE ACT ESTABLISHED A PROGESS FOR IDENTIFYING AND: SECURING ALL RECORDS RELATING TO THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY AND COLLECTING THEM IN THE PRESIDENT JON F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS COLLECTION AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES IN COLLEGE PARKA MARYLAND. THE ACT ALSO ESTABLISHED THE ASSASSIMATION RECORDS REVIEN BOARD (ARAB) TO COORDIMATE AND QUERSEE THE PROCESS. THE DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN WORKING GLOSELY WITH THE ARRB TO ENSURE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS AND OVER A YEAR AGO PRODUCED ITS COLLECTION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES. Z. THERE REMAINS, HOMEVER ONE PROVISION OF THE ACT. FOR WHICH THE SECRETARY MUST RELY ON YOUR OFFICE FOR INPLEMENTATION. THE ACT ENVISIONED AN APPROACH TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS FOR ANY RECORDS THAT THEY MIGHT POSSESS. SPECIFICALLY, SECTION 10 QU (21 OF THE ACT STATES THAT IT IS THE "SENSE OF CONGRESS THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE SHOULD CONTACT. .. MY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT THAT MAY HOLD INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE ASSASSIMATION AND SEEK DISCLOSURE OF SUCH INFORMATION. * 113* 3. IN ITS CONGRESSIONALLY MANDATED SEARCH FOR ASSASSIMATION RECORDS. THE ARRB WISHES TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE MEXICAN GOVERMMENT OR LOGAL GOVERMMENT AGENGIES IN MEXICO MAINTAIN RECOLOS THAT ARE RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY. THE ARRE NOTES THAT THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY ATTRACTED THE ATTENTION OF THE WORLDS AND THAT THE RESPONSE OF THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT TO THE EVENT WOULD BE ORac:: INTEREST. INFADDITIONE RECONDS OF MEXICAN AUTHORITIES CONCERNING LEE HARVEY OSTALD'S VISIT TO MEXICO CITYAIN : SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 1963 WOULD BE OF INSERS A 1. WITHOUT BEING AWARE OF THE STRUCTURE AND ORGAMIZATION OF POTENTIALLY RELEVANT MEXICAN FILES, THE ARRE CANNOT PROVIDE SPECIFIC GUIDANCE ON THE APPROPRIATE STRATEGY FOR ENSURING A COMPREHENSIVE SEARCH. THE ARRB IS WILLING TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MAY BE REQUIRED. ANY SEARCH FOR REGORDS SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: UNCLASSIFIED Department of State SHC9833 STATE 884217 232106Z CAI ANY AND ALL RECORDS RELATED TO TRE AETIVITIES OF THE MEXICAN AUTRORITIES DESCRIBED IN THE DIPLOMATIG CRYE -88 NOTES 70 THE UNITED STATES ENBASSY ON MEXICO CITY FROM THE MEXICAN SECRETARIAY OF FOREICN RELATIONS NO. 504826 DATED MAY 161 1964, AND NO. 565583 DATED JUNE 9, 1964. THESE ACTIVITIES IRCLUDE: -CLOSURE OF THE BORDER BY THE DEPARTRENT OF THE INTERIOR ON NOVENDER 22, 1963; --DEPLOYMENT OF TROOPS THAT SAME DATE "TO TIGHTEN SURVEILLANCE IN TRE BORDER AREA• ESPECIALLY AT REYNOSA CIUDAD MIQUEL ALEMAN NUEVO LAREDOE AND MATAMOROS;* AND -- INVESTICATION OF OSWALD'S TRIP TO MEXICO CITY IN SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 19630 AND ESPEGIALLY OF HIS MEANS OF ENTERING AND EXITING MEXICO AND&HIS-CONTACTS-WITH SILVIA TIRADO-DURAN AN-EMPLOYEE OF THE CUBAN CONSULATE BI ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS THAT IDENTIFY: AMERICAN REQUESTS TO MEXICO FOR INFORNATION ABOUT THE ASSASSIRATION AND TRE MEXICAN RESPONSES TO THOSE REQUESTS. IC) ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS, STUDIES,. INQUIRIES OR INVESTIGATIONS BY MEXICAN GOVERNHENT ENTITIES OF THE ASSASSINATION. TAL BOTT SHG9833 --- ## Page 10 13-00000 SECRET (DRAFT) CSI 1997-444 25 September 1997 MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: DO/LA Fred Wickham, DO/IMS John F. Pereira Chief, CSI/HRG Priority Request from Chairman, JEK Assassination Records Board 1. (S) The purpose of this memorandum is to advise you of priority request from the Chairman of the JFK Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) . The request concerns records related to Lee Harvey Oswald that may be held by the Mexican Government. 2. (S) At his initiative, I met recently with the ARRB Chairman, Judge John Tunheim. He said the reason for the meeting was to ask that CIA assist the Board by making inquiries determine if the Mexican Government has certain records related to Oswald's activities in Mexico in late 1963. Of particular interest to the Board is whether the Mexicans have copies of tapes from joint (tel-tap operations, including coverage of Oswald's telephone calls to the soviet Embassy. He said that locating such records is "the highest priority of the Board." (The attached letter from the ARRB's General Counsel explains the Board's interest.) 3. Earlier this year, the Board sought unsuccessfully to obtain information about Oswald from the Mexican Government via the State Department. (See attached cable.) Mexico responded by providing copies of the same material that had been made available to the Warren Commission in 1964. The problem for the Board was that, in making the request to Mexico, it did not want to reveal information about the Board knew of from CIA records. Being sensitive to the Agency's request to protect this information, Tunheim would like the Agency, to contact directly) on the Board's behalt. CL BY 0185904 CL REASON 1.5 (b,c, &d) DECL BY X1 DRV FRM LIA 2-82 --- ## Page 11 13-00000 SECRET SUBJECT: Priority Request from Chairman, JFK Assassination Records Board (FOUO) During the meeting with Tunheim, I said that we would discuss his request with the appropriate people in the Agency. In view of the priority that Tunheim places on this matter, I recommend that our JFK Project Leader (Barry Harrelson) and I meet with you or other appropriate DO representatives soon to discuss possible options for responding to the request. John Pereira Attachments CL. BY (0185904 CL REASON 1.5 (b,C, 8d) DECL BY X1 DRV FRM LIA 2-82 --- ## Page 12 13-00000 SECRET CL BY: 611637) CL REASON: Section 1.5 d DECL ON: X5 DRV FAM: LIA 2-82 1 December 1997 MEMORANDUM FOR: Ja Do Frearck c. wIcKnam @ DO FROM: J. Barry Harrelson JFK Project Officer CSI/HRG OFFICE: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: JFK Board Request - Mexico City Request from ARRB Chairman, Judge Tunheim re Intercepts of Oswald's calls; Letter fr ExDir, ARRB, to C/HRG dated Sept 5, 1997 same subject I provided copies of the two Oswald telephone intercepts received from the Station to the ARRB staff. The ARRB staff has responded with a number of questians for the Station to ask [ ] The list of questions is being faxed to you; please call if you have not received it by noon today (Monday). Judge Tunheim will be in Washington on 15 December and has ask for an update on the status of the request. Thank you for your assistance with this request, if you have any questions please call me on 31825. Barry CC: John Pereira @ DCI Sent on 1 December 1997 at 10:14:23 AM SECRET --- ## Page 13 13-00000 FAx'd 10:25Am 12/1191 SECRET Classification of Material Transmitted HISTORICAL REVIEW GROUP CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF INTELLIGENCE Phone # 703-613-1806 PLEASE DELIVER IMMEDIATELY **** CLASSIFIED FAX SUBJECT: QUESTIONS FOR.CDS FROM: BARRY HARRELSON, SCIICSI/HRG SENDING FAX NO. 703-613-30607 DELIVER TO: X77 148 DO) LA RECEIVING FAX NO. 703-234-10967 DATE TRANSMITTED: *1/9, PAGES TRANSMITTED: 2 (including cover sheet) TRANSMITTED BY: BUNNiE HUNTER +47777777777 ***** +7773724 MESSAGE: PRIORITY SECRET Classification of Material Transmitted --- ## Page 14 13-00000 secret Classification of Material Transmitted FAX. COVER SEBE1 SUBJECT: QueSTIOns FROM: michelle combs SENDING FAX NO: 202-638-4274 DEVaRTO: Barry Hamelson RECEIVING FAX NO: 703-613-3060 DATE TRANSMITTED: 7 210097 PAGES TRANSMITTTED (including cover sheet) 2. I"d 36. 9O NHE --- ## Page 15 13-00000 SECRET Barry, These are our questions to be passed to the COS with our thanks. Michelle 1. Can we have the original documents? 2. Does the date and location appear on the original documents? is there any indication as to when and where they were added? 3. Is there a Spanish version of the transcripts? Can we have it if one exists? 4. Where were the two transcripts found? What file or box? Who found them? 5. What else is in the file or box where these two transcripts were found? 6. Are there any additional files on the assassination or any post assassination investigation still in existence? 7. Were any files on the assassination or any post assassination investigation destroyed under a routine records destruction schedule? 8. Are there any teltap tape recordings from the era 1960-1963 still in existence? 9. Are there any individualswho were involved in the teltap, the Sylvia Duran interrogation, and/or any post assassination investigation who could be interviewed by the ARRB? 10. Are there any persons knowledgeable about the filing system and records management both in 1963 and to the present who could be interviewed by the ARRB and might have some knowledge of the disposition of any teltap information, any Syliva Duran interrogation records, and /or any assassination or post assassination records in the archives? SECRET • . --- ## Page 16 13-00000 OCT 21 '97 22:01 MEXI 206• MO: NO: a20: loane see the Spanish tranaeria lo 6 spuala in English to semoso In tao bsolspowen: I0 said viali (RE. 22 20 5, 25) • Do you spoal Rundlan? Yes. lay don't Jen 50110 11ml I don't know.. MO takos tha phoso end ifs 1a crocoa Jussieri I was 1a goin Inbassy and spoiso to you concur, Just a minute MI tatos tao phone asd acts 10 17 Inglish mast dos be want? (1a Russian/ Floase spoak Riselame What also do you want: I was just now at your sabassy and they sodd my eddress I lazow that. apoaks terrible, herdly recogaizablo Russian/ I did 10t know it then. I went to the Cuben Inbeesy to sa 10r 105 • I address, because they bave 1t.. Viay don't Jos cono' agaiz and loave your eddause with us, not far fron the Cubm Erbassy. Well, I'll be shere sagat away. 29 Septanbes 1933 Sortet Imbassy **. --- ## Page 17 13-00000 ul car ceili mesa P. 3 P3:" 151. MO:. OBY: LES: OBY: 03%: LEE: In at tea 18) 10/ tho sano porcon uho peedd a dur do es ago and spoke 11 broson Ruscian/ spouce so CariOT. fello, this yes OSWED (phos) spoaking. I was au your placa last Saturday and spoke to a consul, and touy said that they'd serd a talegram to Wascington, so i Wassue to fluc out 1f you have anything now? But I don' renaibes the Zama of that concis KOSTIKOV. Ee 13 daris /halT 0r 8k13?/. XeS. MY SONS IS OSWAID. Just a minute I'1l fine out. Icey say trau they inventt received su this yet.. Have they core anything? Yes, they say that a request has beon sont out, but total=s has beer receivod as yet. And what...? /OlY hangs up/. 249. • (previously transcribed) • * Octaber 1963 Soviet Inbassy --- ## Page 18 13-00000, SECRET CL BY:0185904 CL REASON: Section 1.5 d DECL ON: X5 DAV FRM: LIA 4-82 NOTE FOR: Ermund Enhen @ DA # DA FROM: OFFICE: DATE: SUBJECT: Lee S. Strickland @ DA John F. Pereira CSI/HRP 01/23/98 05:19:59 PM Meeting with Chair, JFK Board (S) At his request, I met with the Chairman of the JFK Board, Judge Jack Tunheim this morning for more than an hour. A principal topic of discussion was the status of the Agency's response to Tunheim's request that we ask to provide records and other information related to Oswald's time in Mexico. (The station is following up on a preliminary response] (FOUO)Tunheim described efforts the Board is making to obtain records directly from the KGB , with State Department assistance. Not much success so far. (FOUO) We also discussed the general relationship between the Board and CIA, about which he was very positive. He is aware that we have added resources to step up the pace of our review in view of the 1 September deadline. He said that he does not see much chance that Congress would extend the Board's charter again. Ed: Tunheim asked that we set up a meeting with you on 18 Feb, when he'll be in town for a meeting of the Board. CG: J. Barry Harrelsonl Sent on 23 January 1998 at 05:19:59 PM SECRET --- ## Page 19 13-00000 MEMORANDUM September 19, 1998 To: CIA SPECIAL COLLECTIONS RELGASE IN FULL 2000 Laura Denk Executive Director cc: From: Bob Skwirot CIA Team Leader Michelle Combs Michelle Conto Associate Director for Research and Review Subject: CIA-IR-05 Possible Foreign Source for Records on Oswald The Review Board requested that the CIA assist in locating and acquiring records relevant to Lee Harvey Oswald and the assassination of President John Kennedy which might exist in the files of a foreign government agency. Due to the foreign liaison sensitivity of this request, information on this issue was passed between the CIA, Review Board Chairman Judge John Tunheim, and one Review Board staff member. On September 15, 1998, Chairman Tunheim and I flew to Houston to consult with CIA Directorate of Operations officers on the likelihood of the existence of additional records and the possibility that the CIA would be successful in acquiring these records. These CIA officers demonstrated that they had consulted numerous times with the senior officials of the foreign government but had, thus far, been unsuccessful in obtaining additional records or in confirming, visually, the existence of additional records. The CIA agreed to continue to work to obtain these records. e: \combs \cia-ir05.wpd File 4.20.1 and 4.20.4 --- ## Page 20 13-00,00 re CIA IRO5 Assassination Records Review Board 600 E Street NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20530 (202) 724-0088 • Fax: (202) 724 0457 & BN December 18, 1997 CLA BRESLAL COLLECTIONS RELZASE IN FULL Mr. John Pereira Chief 2000 Historical Review Group Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 02505 Re: Status of CIA Responses to Assassination Records Review Board's Requests for Additional Information and Records Dear John: I am writing to follow-up on our telephone call earlier today and to convey my serious concern about the status of CIA's responses to the Review Board's requests for additional information and records. Although CLA has completed its responses to several requests, and many others have been answered in part, a significant number of requests have not been answered - including some that were made more than two years ago. On many occasions we have been assured that responses would be forthcoming, only to have promised dates come and go without answers. It is now extremely important that these requests be answered promptly so that we may conduct a proper follow-up if necessary. The issues that we can now identify as being of the highest priority are identified in the text below by double asterisks (**)' and we request that they be answered within the next month. We request that the remaining requests be answered by April 1, 1998. The remainder of this letter is divided into two parts: first, a listing of the formal requests for information and records, and second, a listing of the informal requests for information and records. Please let me know if your understanding of any of the following points differs from ours so that we can resolve any potential discrepancies. 'As identified more fully below, the issues are: CIA-1 Organizational Material, CLA-6 Cables and Dispatches, CIA-13 Backchannel Communications, CLA-IR-03 HTLINGUAL Documents, CIA-IR-04 Disposition of Angleton Files, CIA-IR-07 Claude Barnes Capehart, CIA-IR-15 Electronic "take" from Mexico City, CIA-IR-21 DRE Monthly Operational Reports, CIA-IR-22 " A" Files on Clay Shaw and Jim Garrison. BOARO MEMBERS: JOhn R. Tunheim, Chair • Henry F. Graff • Kermir !. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson --- ## Page 21 13-00000 Mr. John Pereira December 18, 1997 Page 7 Documents file: documents Nos. 496, 498, 499, 500, and 510. The Review Board is awaiting confirmation that these documents are at HIRG for processing. CIA-IR-05 Possible Foreign Source for Records on Oswald. CIA was informally requested to use its contacts to pursue certain records related to Oswald that were orally described to CIA. The Review Board understands that the CIA has taken steps to pursue these records. CIA-IR-06 QKENCHANT. The Review Board seeks information regarding the purpose of QKENCHANT and its connection with Clay Shaw, Howard Hunt, and Monroe Sullivan. The Review Board was initially provided some information in regard to this request that now appears to be incorrect. CIA is now seeking additional information to correct or to clarify its previous answers. The Review Board seeks an immediate, full, and accurate formal response to this request. Once the formal statement is provided, this request will be complete. **CIA-IR-07 Claude Barnes Capehart. The ARRB staff has reviewed all records that CIA has been able to locate to date. During the course of this review, additional questions were raised that CIA agreed to pursue. CIA also agreed to conduct additional searches to determine whether there may be additional retrievable records on Mr. Capehart. The Review Board seeks a full and accurate formal response to this request. Once the formal statement is provided, this request will be complete. • CIA-IR-08 Unredacted Copy of the "Family Jewels" Memoranda. ARRB has reviewed a redacted version of the "Family Jewels." Additional questions have been raised. At meeting between HRG, ARRB and the DCI/IRO on December 11, 1997, specific redacted pages were identified for ARRB staff review. These pages should be made available as soon as possible. ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10161-10321.pdf
104-10161-10321
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
1/1/64
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
ADDRESS COVER SHEET.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK45 : F17 : 20040301-1051573 :
1
## Page 1 104-10161-10321 WASILINGTON 3 LEAN OFFICE Take Jorge Washington Park Way to BPR turnoff. 1820 N. Ft. Meyer Drive Roslyn, Va. JOhn HART sur Millips? /Ops - Ext: 3481 638-5074 (Area Code hicoil010: 109-8049 (Area Code 301)J8 - Walter CINI (pronounced Chini 0S ReD, 3E04 FT - S Hair Hask.f Pal Bearat 3.. Exte 6528 Dĩd/s pads, oto) 703 2922 ncealment Ext. Ext. 03 2292 Wil - William V. BROE AH - Jake ESTERLINE (Exod & Persornel) WIl 3 = LArry STERNFIELD NDP • Desmond FITZGERAL RECTOR - DicK HELMS BUk-South - Ed FENNIMORE Ron 4824 Il/Cuba • Les RATY (pronounced Rattl FUR -Ralph KISLY us x-6313 spain _(friend of WASHINGTON (A.C WITTE & Dorthy) (10125 Markham Ave.) 0б (Four Corners) Silver Spring. Md. Home: 593-0368 08 Off. EXt. 4147 - Russ Jon Ed LAFFIN 5614 06 & Maj-Lis 6314 Tulsa Lane* 66 Bethesda, Md. Home: (460-63894811 off Ext. 6223 *Irom Bolt exit at Old Georgetown Rd (Clemente HERNANDEZ American Institute for free Labor Development 1925 K St N.W. Social Projects Phone: 965-2100(Area Code202 635-3172 (Area Code703 06 Sally SWINSON (3707 Leland St) 0 They Cast- MeT 08 c/o MrS. Robert Phelps Fred HENDFRSON) 06X-6523 Room 5C40 G629 Beacon Lane 06 Falle Church, Virginia 22043 Mathew NOCULLOUGT O6 Kin 283603 (10401 Grosvenor Place) Apt 2322 8 Phone 1 7493-9534) Phone: (35/- 6223 from out BCG. 71 x=4460 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32576377.pdf
124-10223-10362
04/26/2018
Redact
04/17/2018
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
null
12/15/2017
null
## Page 1 FD-36 (Rev. 10-29-63) FBI. 1/15/65 Date: (Type in plain text or code) AIR MAIL - REGISTERED (Priority) Transmit the following in AIRTEI Via TO : FROM: RE: Director, FBI SAC, Los Angeles (92-1112) LA COSA NOSTRA ANTI-RACKETEERING - CONSPIRACY 6 JAF Re Los Angeles radiogram to Bureau and New York dated 1/13/65. on 1/13/65 LA 4448-C-TE furnished the following information: On the night of 1/12/65 informant was visiting with NICK LICATA, "Under-Boss" of the Los Angeles "Brugad" of La Cosa Nostra. they Part of their discussion related to the intensified investigation by local, and in particular. Federal investigative agencies into the activities of La Cosa Nostra and its leaders. In this connection, LICATA told informant, Thing will never be destroyed" • He expressed confidence ir the ability of the organization to resist infiltration and discussed certain reprisals taken against "members" enemies in past years. 3) Bureau (REGISTERED) → Chicago (Encl. 4) REGISTERED Clevelana inch; 4) (REGISTERED Dallas (Enc1. 0) REGISTERED Denver (Encl. 4) (REGISTERED 2 2 "Detroit (Encl. 4) (REGISTERED. - Kansas City (Encl. 4) (REGISTE - New YorK (RA 24) (REGSTERED) - Phoenix (Encl. 4) (REGISTERED, - Portland' (Encl. 4) (REGISTERED' 2 2 4) REGISTERED - Pittsburg city EncI: 4) (REGISTERED) 2 - San Diego (Encl. 8) 2 - San Francisco (Enc.10) (REGISTERED) - Seattle (Enci. 4) (E - Los Angeles NEY/sef 92-6054 BE JAN 18 1965 Approved: 2919 Sent - M Per rat Agent in Charge DocId: 32576377 Page 1 1 --- ## Page 2 LA 92-1112 LICATA then told informant that in addition to the larger better-known "Brugads" of the bast and Mid-West. that the Now sork arousat in particular littie was inown of organization" had smaller discussed - about whom -- located at various places throughout the country. As an illustration, LICATAmentioned "our group" in San Francisco, and "our group"in San Jose, California. He then identified the "Boss" of the San Francisco group JAMES LANZA and the "Boss" of the San Jose group as JOE as CERRITO. LICATA also spoke of another such group as "our group" in Texas. He did not elaborate further, but the inference drawn by informant was that other such small sroups were located elsewhere, and their existence was not a matter of general knowledge to all "members" of other "Brugads" In connection with the San Francisco and San Jose groups, informant advised that he had little contact with these one "Brugad" with the atways presumed that they were part of under one "Boss" with the other group operating as a "Caporegima" whom informant had thought was JOSEPH CERRITO. He noted that this might still be the case and LICATA was actually identifying the-man in charge "on the spot" as JOSEPH ADAMO might be referred to as the "Boss" of the San Diego group, although he is actually a "Capo" under the Los Angeles "Boss" VICATA then referred again to the "Commissione" City as its City ate enthunters the "organization"and New York •He pointed out that since the publicity of the Apalachin Meeting, that such large meetings no longer occur and leaders of these smaller the "Conmis fenerally, do not have direct contact with In this connection, he mentioned that FRANK DESIMONE "Boss" of the Los Angeles "Brugad" Western "Brugads" before the "Commissione" on thos smaller on those occasions when a Western U. S. representative was necessary. After such meeting:, according to LICATA, it was the responsibility of DESIMONE to relay the instructions of the "Commissione" to the "Bosses" of other Western "Brugads" - 2 - DocId:32576377 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 LA 92-1112 LICATA did not further identify such groups. He did mention that DESIMONE had numerous expenses in connectior le also mentioned that DESIMONE had to oc at least a half dozen times last year and after such trips he had to relay instructions to certain other "Bosses" • Again, LICATA did not further identify such contacts except to mertionission lucil had amons other Contact Texelayed sate instructions to "the , on at least one occasion last year (This may possibly be JOSEPH FRANCIS CIVELLO Of the Dallas, Texas area, known at least on occasion in the past, to have been in contact with the Los Angeles "Brugad" LICATA then told informant in strict confidence -- requestine informant not to discuss this with any other "member" of the -- that DESIMONE had to be in New York on 1/25/65 to attend a meeting of the "Commissione" LICATA did not state that he knew the purpose of unis neeting, but speculated tost t possibly would relate to the appointment of a new for the JOE by all the other "Brusad" end, perhared "reconition of this "Brugad" in La Cosa Nostra. He did indicate, however, that after this meeting, "Bosses" to it would again be necessary for DESIMONE to contact other relay "Commissione" instructions. - the late JACK DRAGNA (deceased in 1950) as Los Angeles "Brugad" of La Cosa Nostra. DESIMONE was an attendee at the Apalachin Meeting in November, 1957. For a number of months, DESIMONE has not resided in the Los Angeles area and his whereabouts are known only to his very closest associates. between himself and "members" of the Los Angeles of the Los Angeles "Brust"atact matters of special urgency only. the only individual known to have regular contact with him is "Under-Boss" NICOLO LICATA. of DESIMONE to the individual It iS LIVATA who relainemerinstruction aga orders LICATA has not confided to other "members" as to the - 3 - DocId:32576377 Page 3 --- ## Page 4 LA 92-1112 whereabouts of DESIMONE or where they meet. Recent investigation has determined that DESIMONE is presently residing at 517 Tyron Street, El Cajon, California. This home and all utilities are listed in the name of an associate, PETE MONTANA. DESIMONE, has apparently kept his residence here a well-guarded secret. This information has been handled in a most discreet manner by the San Diego and Los Angeles Offices. Following is a description of DESIMONE: Name Sex Race Nationality Date of birth Place of birth: Height Weight Hair Eyes Marital status FBI # Automobile Occupation Characteristics Residence FRANK DESIMONE Male White American 7/17/09 Fueblo, Colorado 5'11" 190 pounds Brown Brown Single 770 726 C 1960 White Cadillac, coupe De ville license QXE 608 California Attorney Wears thick lensed dark glasses; reportedly blind or nearly blind in right eye. 7838 Adoree, Downey, California - RECOMMENDATION Reference is made to information outlined above indicating that DESIMONE represents other "Brugads" in the Western United States at certain "Commissione meetings and that he then relays instructions to other Reference is also made to certain remarks made ESTER EIDAD So intorant (upra) inaluating the existence - 4 - DocId: 32576377 Page 4 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10195-10008.pdf
104-10195-10008
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
01/01/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
ADDP, C/CI/R&A
AC/WH/COG
MEMORANDUM WITH ATTACHMENTS: SUBJECT - GARRISON AND THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION
16
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-30 : F10 : 1998.04.08.19:26:41:030115 :
16
## Page 1 104-10195-10008 •rt Almona moun belando : . CIT:A 1" MUt:H0d A.ed120X30 Pecca) 1111,01: te-ci" glitter 1.11.01 lorelle dati i 9M111 :il.': dian. lion a!?. Parairan: 8: 0970134-111 much 1n101 .A Plo egiti 1:1 13:3 thdiihm1a 111.0813 •.-1. ".1." tie: --- ## Page 2 1i0 id doae 1i7-199 --- ## Page 3 "Poan Midtelaahrit nio elna dodes dlel ceredeonór mrodedcnchara) le to ::. inigs ..', .A N'1° Fil toinli .illiad® •A1L: Mirrdlieda iel bil% NUS 1221 Gili th.: 1.5". Jasnn Calt Aneigs ohe ARCACHNA s lnxe ind?ercaasa ric'ómaoné Ltiginles 01" Mlabordt BUC C HU1 solici veucon :! ): Lir.t'lie ?Ma SOTON isd." ". til 1iilble iririande. 2lodl dahee MIcRidon!d 1:14• X":, Oili?. 'i"rie!' lein:eirlado •ureer. t'ig llviii Maiho d ChnGLande fivinis • **8 ilad colgi condio sáomatt bälas Cax'g raiite" nae i" tnadedliil itwoma, solie". peuninead Cubäns D01. Lhic: daatiaaanal drceé eoai uiisir'iràs. •I 11. id tre; Jazdtrike 1iol calel deleclo iat AACACIl! Jate. iyat slree do odmaete nii.a dee coin-dt ao umseci ta icoel Hiai Mrleaosa "i". uris: ALIICi ti: lsadcoa .i:. dis Hioril TlEsl, Caracis, Liata'ci Oldar: •aiEXI1'1 Uw3: 15 1026. Puplesses Strsel, --- ## Page 4 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 5 cd-idono; iázje= Nyrrnns 4:t0 29. 2s/1) "rlos Hytllee ts :1 clretaroe od Duan Fo Gio DGrNGobka ii lirgo sii ci: :": inbolilao1l. Hils. Ticraadio 1001 hn wti ccaptored tormairn!l r...1: GClA's-0! iils MalodS l teimynl i it in Cticl; aeo lle beelled Calelor aae Taakyxa was an yogis colil it 'thi lime ol .uains xecgutlmeste 1'31 lt'iir. --- ## Page 6 tina. ili: ti. ...i ris ..i.." ...i!' i. --- ## Page 7 14-00000 1*:96 : 1 H:*:: •atmidlo gll ö:li re dope ge ci incor Toinactee) cis i...l.: •2oe dot Orieaoe.' Rodrasadhai". ':., :. ...!s: doine Coloor Poslg Cigtlolin •o,"!" rse? ,.1:. Paelpli t.ilo Hillleef plino" a1! r..18d..d iee 1.e61 L5 1rChe 1es frisone. impirieols. a':.e'rtalei9' d.tiin. noli ii ilptiadid'lléni ririi: I. i 1.'.- I'si nl' 1o cinlaat satis 1!10: 415 11e199 i::i. 1t'1 473/5 /•t•'d ..1:.'. 'Ü::' i..lel iidso g'."'a •1 41 . 1. is tro •mil, i1s parolk 14492353301 90 22 ::14119° ci "cordiben kil!i lunitol:. 1!:.. il! sironird init inladog iindd inte 10!!: ieriit liltial: "irtil ks:! 1Iтs, il'.j inocin't" ie. 1D2 40. 11 1:, Nho Urleans Xadaaa L't: CovIn: ti. Fore Bạn Aub y --- ## Page 8 ici lin 11ad cilin 10 1:0%1 Hotsid 1.d 119:! ...., : 101:1 1l:17.::a Sile 1:220is 1ii. W.13 Liniciava Madras Peti: tians. 1lon la trei 1111: ss e on variou:: Lit' diu Rive •his п6s.. indicatos he: 1: BRAVE for ident Al ¿ua: i'*. il antes tini 4{er1ß1 ALVA " L vicies :ilt barth ile 11503 Bairreion in cones Mecossals 0 0e: 5009154 SCarion victos iticu --- ## Page 9 14-00000 lei puente diegos correncia: -a.1:1100: tonto :telle d1 sudore 1671' 11. 11110r. Trr.linh. intino 1?1 " 1:11: •J: ii?s 1-1!61 117 11:: tai' ir,. --- ## Page 10 D7Og That Cust shiela needintly idenrifiable 1':: IN AS EIIO 19601anl enlisari cind in tridg 2505. chalin pilot. sorted durin Lizzi Cant middleasad ii: Xiia' 1R010Y° CN idication lie irate eodei." colonel by the apologe adled Lila? iris participation ₫ the zavale. --- ## Page 11 coratode itale. 111 filc.i Vil 111i7. el concitate arm 1185. rootetel ille:i. ¡preliee: abillatte L'1/N in i in fil, d'ut tor italed l.:: niti appil itt dio proces 111 --- ## Page 12 81..68:6e1 i ile:: "•I412ti6;] hel mar ca chl00%s1 --- ## Page 13 mlieip o10 allicud bisiie --- ## Page 14 haiti 119. 111i1. •* *; drile in 11:19 13i ixi" solit: i. •"!: lilian і1 1e 111:'*2 migarlore" Whis -Pilareal ill'ri ÷1143 iNvi "O!: AlD. Laoy Mitad Curlser Lisen d llorarios" 111.. Кито ни 11..1. st indicatir colit 1120) 1162. 1d01" Ст ста днІ. --- ## Page 15 "Авокани l'i: Donald vil. гладі-і÷? ¿ness dil allie '1: 100! 1130 3NE 11!211 granner-el L04÷4-2 110d.C.: slogar in Clacy 1 11 THE 100110 1? 81. 416.11108,0; • 10 11119.0111-11.1 tatter si 1.:e. d°OJ6,N': Leanne Bad 11161 1111: Lily no on Litt's 14188 Kennedy and Paa dated tar: JAVI PiD and Che poisonel: 1811.11110 Lie bro be of any QUS UndER CA. aceral to largiciane Sociate cl •lle the A sency participation celia, a latt numbie be directly involved vili- both --- ## Page 16 i". •1% 10e1.219 siste. 121" Hele: parteci sto; Lipoiler Epiroslias I5711 E]?" #i1168 1i! 14:10911. t•*1 ci i i:; лlab.е°.i8..: ---
2,018
/releases/2018
docid-32303130.pdf
124-10283-10142
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
8/11/61
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
92-2918-2ND NR 100
DIRECTOR, FBI
SAC, PG
2
FBI
HQ
02/28/2018
2
## Page 1 JFK Assassination System Identification Form Agency Information Date: 5/28/201 AGENCY: RECORD NUMBER : RECORD SERIES: FBI 124-10283-10142 HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 92-2918-2ND NR 100 Document Information ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: TO: TITLE : SAC, PG DIRECTOR, FBI DATE: 08/11/1961 PAGES: 2 SUBJECTS : [Restricted] DOCUMENT TYPE: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified RESTRICTIONS : 4 CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 09/11/1998 OPENING CRITERIA: INDEFINITE COMMENTS : v9.1 DocId: 32303130 Page 1 7 --- ## Page 2 COMGUNICAMORS DEVON AVO 1:1196 Cita Mr BrOL fir. Moles Mr. Etonea.. IS:: Funera Mr, Aretter Me. Jeccam Mise Guate URGENT. 8-11-51: 3-35 PM NP TO, DIRECTOR, FBI -92-2914--92-2918 FROM, SAC,. PITISBURSH 92-2-36--92-228 2-P GABRIEL MANNARINO, AKA, ARO, SAMUEL MANNARINO, AKA, AR. ON EIGHT ELEVEN INSTANT, DJ ATTORNEY WILLIAM KEHOE TELEPHONICALL! CONTACTED SA THOMAS GO FORSYTH III FROM MIAMI, FLA. HE SAID HE AND DJ ATTORNEY KENNY INTERVIEWED JOSEPH RO MEROLA PAST TWO DAYS IN MIAMI AND FELT MEROLA WAS: COOPERATING RE MANNARINOS. MEROLA SAID WILL NOT TESTIFY. KEHOE HAD MEROLA: AGREE TO INTERVIEW BY BUAGENTS BUT MEROLA WILL NOT TALK WITH AGENTS OF MIAMI OFFICE, WILL NOT COME TO PITTSBURGH AND INSISTS DJ ATTORNEY KENNY BE PRESENT DURING INTERVIEW. MEROLA AGREEABLE TO INTERVIEW IN MIAMI BY SA JOHN SO PORTELLA, WITH WHOM HE HAS AT LEAST A SURFACE FRIENDLY RELATIONSHIP, AND SA FORSYTH WHO IS HANDLING MANNARINO INVESTIGATIONS, KEHOE ASKED IF SAS PORTELLA AND FORSYTH COULD COME TO MIAMI ON AUGUST FOURTEEN NEXT FOR INTERVIEW AND WAS ADVISED HE SHOULD MAKE REQUEST THROUGH NORMAL CHANNELS. KEHOE SAID HE WOULD CALL AAG SILBERLING AT DU AND HAVE HIM MAKE REQUEST OF BUREAU. KEHOE FEELS THAT SINCE SAS PORTELLA AND FORSYTH ARE MORE FAMILIAR THAN HE WITH ACTIVITIES AND ASSOCIATES 1961 2- 2918- NOT RECORDE 167 AUG 17 1964 ORIGINAL COPT code. is 66 AUG 221961 DocId: 32303130 Page 2 --- ## Page 3 PAGE TWO MOF MANNARINOS AND OF MEROLA: THEY CAN CONDUCT A MORE PENETRATIVE QUESTIONING OF MEROLA. FORSYTH AND PORTELLA WILL TAKE NO ACTION VACBO END ACK PPSL 3-38 PM OK FBI WA WS DISC wei: yne 11 3 3064381 indee indicate DocId: 32303130 Page 3 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10164-10086.pdf
104-10164-10086
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
01/29/1962
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CHIEF CI/OA
CHIEF WH
ORLANDO BOSCH AVILA TOOK EXTREMELY CRITICAL VIEW OF KUBARK POLICY AND PERSONNEL.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-3 : F15 : 1998.01.06.16:05:58:700107 :
1
## Page 1 104-10164-10086 89 Juanry 1962 SORTECT 8 Orlando BOSCH AvlIa vuten ant 8I ehrela condusted en the above sund Bebfeet soval that on 20 My 1066, an atvertisemt appene whieh the Dubjeet took an trenty mitten vor ef AT #Are 1004890 Dul Ano no mont to tram Cita do Cantro himals. RETURN TO CIA Background Use Only : Do Not Reproduce Motetbuttent 403-299099 JAN/mon SECRET 92033 I/BR ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10250-10023.pdf
104-10250-10023
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
1/2/76
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
ONE CALVIN WILSON HICKS IS A 51 YEAR OLD.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK43 : F10 : 20040322-1061493 :
1
## Page 1 104-10250-10023 A RETURNTO CIA 0-676323 Background Use Only DOợNg Beast 300% HICKS, Cạlvin MisOn - 0-43133:- SR be identical to one Cal to vison Bicke Era 51 year old ho may OF subject's social reference may . not 7708 2000 One Hicks, 10207 Forest Avenue, Fairfax, was a former GS-13 DDO/SOD Agency employee from 1950 untli disability retirement on 31 December 1974, One Hicks vas a former Military Staff Agent from 1955 to 1958. NOTE: Memorandun contacted this Agency on 15 May 19 Le way o7 indicates thirone Hioker 197S regarding U.s, merchant vessel Mayaguez recently returned Pile contains the following flag sheets: JMARC -Tebruary 1968 TET Offensive. 2 POETCH 0. 32883 Jan. 1976 Z/PV RJB: ds SEORET 1 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10216-10380.pdf
104-10216-10380
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
9/3/65
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
WITHHELD
NOTE: TELEPHONE CALL FROM AMWHIP
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-51 : F7 : 1998.05.30.10:13:05:560109 :
1
## Page 1 104-10216-10380 3566-1-65 lo CA 3 Serteabor 1955 at a90d 1030 Alisai, 1 caio: 16 188 tea Sow Fork to nay that ho indidd iais fio: 14a--e" esgist inat to neo A/1 1n Sureza, le sald there sas 10 15d=a nashed to seo his aborto Repres •2o d/i addos that SAPATO Mas alao foine :e suropa el to dese ti0o. He thought MANso Me rould go te Italy bi had no ether dataile =1111bk Mos trip mas connected rith that of InLESIAS® 3o all eleo sentionad that Herzes seld 15' tre "sas ai to sorical" (NCASI/I) Wa8 011-20 elaborattes. Lo In reply to a query about ury furthar contersaliene 116h 12A3H/2 intadild, 1/1 sold he kad telled to & e tocas no 2it00 with klei 2'ued sha AcAsA mas tatararted 10 "the das 020 141r8"-100. gottlog, neney frus d/do So A/2 aria bo non plana lo Louro Ser Puerto Bico da buBlsosa abert l septenbar and that he will call no en his sutura durias tha met of 5 Septomber. He ot11l plana to depart for Europe about I5 Sopterbere KINS 10/. refases e sete acredita. 3 septilq65 Amlash-1.I ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10216-10011.pdf
104-10216-10011
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
8/9/74
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
COMPUTER PRINT OUT: CROSS REF TO THE 21 FILE CITED UNDER LEFT MARGIN.
4
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-51 : F10 : 1998.04.21.17:56:25:356102 :
4
## Page 1 104-10216-10011 1600 X-REF • SHEET S-E-C-R-E-T DATE 09/08174 2010252234 SYMAA NUMBER DER -547988 HuS HM1M-28671 J08 DOSA-DAIE 08 MAY 74 08 MAY 74 DOGA FILED IN 019-006-156/07 019-006-156107 THE ABOVE DOCUMENT (SI ARE CROSS REFERENCED TO THE 201 FILE CITED UNDER LEFT MARGIN FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LOCATION THE FILE CONTAINING THE RECORO COPY DOCUMENT. CALL FILES SECTION, EXTENSION 4127• S-E-C-R-E-T E2 IMPDET CL. BY 054979 FILE IN 201-0252234 --- ## Page 2 14-00000 SECRET. CO DOCUMENT EXTRACT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201 DOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANDTHER OFFICIAL DO FILE• PERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT ...THE DOCU MENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED FROM IP/FILES. CUBELA, ROLANDO 201-0252234 SEXM 201-0924584 27881 OT MAY .74 AKA ROBERTO, KICKED CÜT OF INTELL CA 68, PER SUB-J 201-0924584° DATE 18 JUL 74 09142622 20r-252234 SEGRET E2 IMPDEI C6_BY 054979 soniara --- ## Page 3 14-00000 1139109279591 X- REF. SHEET SE-C-R-E-T DATE 19/07/7% X-REE... 201-0252234 DIR -547988 DOGA DALE 08 MAY 74 DOSA FILED IN 201-0924584 THE ABOVE DOCUMENTIS ARE CROSS REFERENCED TO THE LOL FILE CITED UNDER LEFT MARGIN• FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LOCATION OF THE FILE CONTAINING THE RECORD COPY DOCUMENT CALL FILES SECTION, EXTENSION 4127 S-E-CR-E-T EZ iMPDET CL BY 054979 FILE IN (201-0252234 wet in fiania has g --- ## Page 4 A +354-8437775 tadt, sas if to get us a X-REF. SHEET S"E-C-R-E-T DATE 26/07/74 A-BEER 201-0252234 SYMB - NUMBEB WMIM-2167I DOG. DAIE O8 MAY T4 DOC. ELLED IN 201-0924584 THE ABOVE DOCUMENTIST ARE CROSS REFERENCED TO THE 201 FILE CITED UNDER LEFT MARGIN. FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LOCATION OF THE FILE CONTAINING THE RECORD COPY DOCUMENT, CALL FILES SECTION, EXTENSION 4127. 27881 F2 IMPDET-19040054978 FILE IN 201-0252234 22-0:22 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10170-10109.pdf
104-10170-10109
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
01/01/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
CIA FILE ON AMERICAN VOLUNTEER GROUP.
76
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-25 : F17 : 1998.02.08.09:33:41:733107 : NBR
76
## Page 1 104-10170-10109 Office of Crison: Report diade At: Subjec falsivas FIRERARID NSUD ANN Classification: folerence: 23 Februmsy 1931 7x-2891 ried Cong B5/037 4 44082 Stanis: Nevert YATBO dated 13 Men, 1015 entitled ver a(r) 1s roquested by tuning, the follariny as funisel by tsa members of Alr ground forens pasources and rechateal stuff. The Arst source, M/Sgt. Farry sney states Chrt Newarm's Mrst nig la PAMED, so was bom and edicted in emany. Inay fromertly nentioned the to of atreation he reedy ander the vernons and also tha sethods of instructions. Sate lives sald thet Nough uns a mechande with the ArO prior to entoring the 1.5. 1oy- Die to his work with the 17T, ISMAN 1a a close friend of reneral ChoraTE: po la a quiet follon and rary solden mtare into concersation. He is bald die to trome. The second nowce, tr. Iris war, stalenths fIT tasedlei fro normany and has been in Chira for a long time, prior to jainin the avo, ba was an enginer. Accerding tour. "Rut, Neuman retar gorassed any oolfiloal sentiments. He 15 a mulet fallou and seldos erzages anyone in corversation The source also states tint he nover heard feuan mention his fantly relations. TADE TINTED Y EADS: Al runnings. This case is considend to be clos d at razing. The furing office say obtsin further inforsation fra other fellos coldlirg of the Alr prond forces resorce and" chrtea? sinfl Distribution: 12 = Washington, DoCo I sero I : net. 202 2 - Funkas 1 - yuelyang sheer in 213*ge. --- ## Page 2 MANCATORY AEVIEW OF CLASSEELED COTOS OF CAN MAN RE ARCHES AND WATERNS Ssivich 1/8/16 Date of Request Name of Depository: Address: JOIN DE KENNEDY. LIBRARY 360 TRAPMO ROAD - WALTHAN, MA 02154. Phone #: 617-223-1230 I hereby request mandatory revier of classified material (see attached list) in the records/document collecti of National Securlly Files (record group or coltection) In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 11652, Section 5 (c). Name of Requestor: Address: Richard D: Mahoney 4019 S. Mill Ave. Tempo, Ariz: 95282 Phone #: --- ## Page 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DECKERSE National Aichie's and Records Service Martingon, DC 20109 In reply refer toi 1LK-76-260 APR: 1 9 578 E- 76-124 Mr. Gune F. WUlson Information and Privacy Coorilnator Certral Intelligraco Agcacy Warrington, Do 2U5os Dear Mro Wilson: Under che provistons of Seccion S(C), Executive Order 11652, 0 researcher has requested the mindatory classification review ef che enclosed document(a) fros the holdings of one of che Presidential libraries. Enclosed are coptes of the researchec'a request and a document list. The identification of the library file which concains the document(a) is given in the documene list. it there is any question concerning this request, do not hesitate to contace UB: t.?+ Please revier the docment(s) and if they may be declausified, mark then approprintely. If a docucent should remin classlfied in the interest of national securiey, please provide us with che applicable exemption category from Section S(B) of the Executive order and with a date or event when autonatic declassificacion say be acconplished. We would appreciate retur of the document copies wich your response.: Sipcerely EDWIN A. THOMPSON Records Declassification Division Enclosures ArR 22 SECRET INCLASSIEIED UPON REMOVAL UE ENCLOSUKES Keep Freedom in Tom Fuisre Wih US. Savings Bonds --- ## Page 4 26 Janiary 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: ATTENTION SUBJECT REFERENCES Chairman, Information Revlew Committee Assistant for Information E.0. 11652-FRichard D. Mahoney (E 76-124) A. Initlal Request dated 8 Janusry 1976. B. GSA Referral Letter w/att. dated 19. April 1976. C. IPS Reply dated 26 July 1976. D. Appeal Letter dated IS August 1976. 1: Summary of Reconnendations: Sustain the initial determination to deny the document in toto under prorision S(B) (2) of E.0. I1652, as amended. Add provision 5(B) (3). 2. Background: On 8 January 1976, Mr. Richard D. Mahoney requested a mandatory review of two classified CIA documents under provisions of Executive Order 11652 Section S(C). The documents were in custody of the National Archives and Records Service (NARS) in the John F. Kennedy Library. b: On. 19. April 1976, the NARS referred Mr: Mahoney's request with copies of the documents to CIA. The Agency was asked to review the documents. If declassified, they were to be marker appropriately. FZ IMPDET CL BY 012170 CONFIDENTIAL When Detached From Allachments SECRET --- ## Page 5 SECRET If they remained classified, the Agency was requested to cite the applicable exemption category from Section S(R) of the F.C. and a date when automnite declassification may be accomplished. They requested that the copies of the documents be returned with the Agency's response. On 26 July 1976, I8S wrote to the NARS and returned copies of the documents. Both documents were found to require continued classi Cication under E.0. 11657 Section 5(B) However, a sanitized vorsion of Item el as found possible and was enclosed. NARS Could adrise requester of his right to appeal directly to ClA. ad. On 15 August 1976, Mr. Mahoney wrote to the ClA and appealed the decision to with- hold from declassification Item 12 of his request. 3. Recommendations: Tih R-? contains TDCSDB 3/657,851 dated 12. November: 1963. During the initial. revicw, the document was denied in toro to requester under provision S(R) (2) of E.Q. 11652, as amended: The document is. based on NCL-1832 dated 10 November 1963. I recommend that the initial determination to deny the document to the requester in toto under provision 5(B) (2) of E.O. 11652 be sustained and that provision s(R)is) of e.o. as amended, 11652 now be applied. The information is .from ¿ sensitive, source with unique access to a poli. tical leader. .If the infornation cause embarrassment to the released united States Govern could ment and exacerbate relations with a friendly foreign government. b. During the DDO appeals revier, a classifi cation review was conducted. The document is properly classified and properly marked in accordance with the provisions. of E.0. 11652 • as amended. Due to the sensitivitv of the subiect matter, a meaningful sanitization cannot he made. CONFIDENTIAL When D:19 hed From Attachments SECRET --- ## Page 6 SECRET recosmendat ions. OGC has nor yet concurred in these DO Appeals Officer Attachments: Tab A • References A-D Tab B = TDCSDB: 3/657,851 COORDINATION C/AF/PLAYS DATE CONFIDENTIAL When Detached From Allachments SECRET --- ## Page 7 Append E 76-13.46 arli els 19 1•19:: $032191192 Sena F. infurtation trivncy 2090l.aa:2= control Intolllsence faturd r.?. 20505 71r: pray: jo.5 Joccent 2 or 82x ^6-43 Inca docunint, SInce I dO L05 110:r perition tr.at 0:1? y Feline beat or peera? the sensitlilty of this rel.asel Ir sanitleed fort.: 11?09 1312956 ter?:: bank you for your sosillerat Fearing fros yod. are conni :11:14%.: 5111090- Rill Syste --- ## Page 8 UNITED STATES or AMERICA GENEVAL SERVICES AOMINISTRATION National Archives and Records Seruice Washing:on, DC. 20108. In reply refer to: NP.K-76-321 WAY 1 0 11/8 Mr. Gone F. Wilson Intonation and Prisey Coordinator Control Intelligence Agoney Nashirgion, DC 20505 • Dear Me. Wilson:. 106 E 76-150 Under the provistons of scution 560), Frecutive Oider 11652, is rescarchos lia regreated the mandatory classification coview of the enclosed document(s) from the Boldloge of one of the Presiduitial librarles. Fnelosed are coples of the remare hod's request and a document list. The Ironetfleation of the Libracy file which contains the documont(3) 11 elven in the document list. Te thore lo any preston concerning chts request, do not healtate to concret 11:9 * Plates color the dewarailed did le thig my ie declassfiled, mark chen appropriately. IF i document Rould rent stamiried in the Interest of masonal seruelly, plore provide no bich the applleable exenpelon category from Soution 5(3) 0f Cho Piccutive order and wich a date or event when auromotic.diclassffication my heaccouplished. Wa would appreciate seturn of the dooment coples with jour temponse. sinnerala Director roveda Doclassification Division linclosures Fax 19 1 24 PH'76 CP Y CLASSINTED WAYS 70Ar. Mtcro.caes --- ## Page 9 •DOX DE THE NATION ARCHES ARD RECORD: CERV EF 1/8/16 Date ne Request. Address: 230 310020 2010 VALELAX, HA 0215' lone 4: 611-223.1220 I hercoy request mandatory. covior of classified mlourial one ditched Tist) in the cocords/docent collections MOLOTAGS QUNEY 23 (r coM coup or cortcction) 1xe0t?: ce will the movision do mortive Oeder 17052, Wene of Remberior: • 180955: Fione : Richard boyle Baloney Генре, Arizon 85282 --- ## Page 10 rr0d 5: Ex22nis 1 CONGIDENCEAL SECRaC TOP SECRET Unmarked (Dut pussihly ilossiried) Jac2o 5 *,------== •13 Polal. ClassiCied Unclessieled AcLachnenes (for information only 3 18 : 1.03 1/1.3/63 !1r1!9.3 Desoription (identiCication, 2bJ:b):* SC No. 00302/&3B: "signiricanos or PTC-African esmolation Agracmont" dennis op doroch Dirioinle oit Feench Activities in Block Alejen" OCT 4o. 2375/63: "Sub jeet: African Renetions to US Positiona Comeil in Security Debatas on Porsuguose Territories and South Africa" Pores 7 tion S C ior archivist: Documento fron ESP:CO:Africs, 8/63-11/63, Bo% 3 --- ## Page 11 MEMORADS FOR: Chairman, Inforantion eries Cooters ATTENTION 50B68 NIFERENCE Executivo Ordor 11062 Appert-- kichard hoyle Bahotry (i 76-150) :. Initial Request fron bars dated 100 Miy 1970 with arteriounts. B. l'S Reply do BaRs died 21 dold 1970. C. Appril better, 2i Septerber 1976. 1. Summary determination Suspin the initivi in tuto TDCShl1/660,?90, ?!1) incolligence robart oriinated he taris Stalion dated 19 Soptonher liod under excoption Ordor (1.0.) 11652, and add the claim or F(l(ü) oF 1. 0. 11052. ?. Backxrosa! il. Richard Doyle Makoney, i neaber at the puttie who is idmiriod a i initiatol Olt § January 1974 ti:rough the Kom dl library a mandator rorion of TheSil- 3/066 ,:0 to eccordaned with the provision: of 1.0. 11052 Section "(C). This request for revior was romarded to the via tho National lochiros and Records Gorice CARE on 10 May 1976. I respondod to 1Al5 on 20 mine 1976 Among other things, Cid denied in tote tocsor wich was Item Da on the Niks roquesi, ou the ground of Section E(B) (2) of lan. 11634. The 1:2 IMPORT 101 Bx 012171 --- ## Page 12 SCRET reply stared that the document had tó remain Massified indefinitely in order to protect intelligence sources and muthods, and stated that release of segregable portions has not feasible. This was based upon a classification review by a Anomiedicable officer dited at May 1976. Mr. Richard Doyle Mahoney appealed this determination directly to It'S in a letter dated September 1976. He specifically asked if it nould not be possible to release a sanitized version of the document without jcopardizing national security. 3. Recommendations: detalied recommendations. See the Appeals Roview Forms for specific A second classification revier was requested ly DOO/ISS/PICG. The second revior was conducted on TDCSUB-3/656,740 on 22. Neconher 1076 by Furope Division, which decided to retain the classification at Scurot in accordance with F.o. 11652. Europe Division wimmined mier rirlow that there bere foreign policy and liaison sonsitivities which precluded dongrading TDCSD -3/056,180, 0r sterilizing the document and releasing portions thorcof. at this time. - 2 - Data hed From Atlachiments --- ## Page 13 it was To touris informian in the doctacht tort scurity. in disclose de that incontion 102d fact he filely do point the linger of duipirit i a relaliyal saall doop or pricelial courers, one of thou is pourer. Fallen lo progres this source would in toon jeopardies Con rotations with carront aid loture sources. officer rote nith this position. Out: his n0l get concuire in theic rocommentations. Arischients: Reference's A.C 47:1. Full Teal of them /665.71 COORDINATION: X EUR/EXO DATE 7 Jan 77 --- ## Page 14 14-00001 €-76-150 NIK: 70-321 StanDar 22, 1975 Inforsation Rovior Coralitos d/o Gias Fo lilson Infomeatlon and Policy Conninator £ 76-150 Madalagton, DoCo 20505 Due infamirilon Roslow Coralitags Walso tho prordulons of Macitira Cider 11552, I tould Ills to appeal dha ClAls doolsion thoroof Man bolng duclasairlado 114. - 76-311. As 193 Agoroy his dons alth sono sany of i declassifleation riguests, todd 1t not bo possiblo to plougo a sunlitial version os tha dosimant withort jropardistng national socurity? I loss turned la racoiulns your roply and mut you for your comilaration of this and Frovious -parls. Sineuralya Telesh Richard Doyle Mahonay joiri Fo Yanna library 330 Trapnlo Road inlthar, Masso 02154 31.: --- ## Page 15 14-00001 1: 25331 86 Best 6 000010888841 BIP LOTES COPIOS TON 6068 (sONA) META CH DE BRICA FOISAS 5-25331 2073 20.c0H P 31 Miniss GONTIDEESIAY --- ## Page 16 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 17 MDENTAL 31 December 1975 MEMIORANDUM POR: Chlof, Information and Privacy Statt SUBJECT REFERENCE F7S-4057 The FBI: forwarded for our terler two documents Release of these docunents (b) (3)(a) and (b) (6) POIA. (SC B0C5 10C5 516/005150 Pd April 1971.5 Charles A. Briggs Chiof, Servicos Staff E2. IMPDET CL BY 0012176 --- ## Page 18 Administrative - Internal Use SAl 4. November 1975 MENORANDUM FOR: Chief, Information and Privncy Staff SUBJECT: REFERENCE: Request No. 75-4057 Subject. This Directorate does maintain an official file on A review of this file and other records of this Directorate reveal the following information identifiable with requester. Please forward these document Seven documents originating with the FBI. descriptions to the so they can correspond directly with the requester. (1) • subject: Date: Vencercmos Brigade 7 January 1970 Origin of Report: Washington, D.C. No Bureau File Number or Field File Number provided. (2) . Subject: Date: 16 June 1970 Origin:: Washington; D.C. No Bureau File Number of Field File Number provided. (3). Subject: Date: 12. June 1970 Committee of Returned Volunteers Origin: New York City File Number: 100-447724 (4) • Subject: Date: 30 Origin: Jeptemder 1970 No Washington, D.C. Bureau File Number or Number Field File provided. (5). Subject: Date: 27 AprIl 1971 Origin: Washington, D.C. File Number: 100-47256 Administrative - Internal Lsa --- ## Page 19 @ministralive - Internal üse (6) ÷ Subject: Cate: 30 Lvare Tr. 4 Origin: Washincion D.C. •File Number: 100-47256 222s (7). Subject: Date: -12 FECT TITT Origin: Washington, D.C. No Bureau File Number or Fleld File Sumber provided. D: One INS report entitled "Sugar Cane Cutters Returning from Cuba," dated 29 April 1970, originating in Portland, Maine. zation Service so they can correspond directly with the requester. c. Three documents originating with this Agency, of which sanitized versions are attached. Further descriptions are as follows: (1). Name Trace Request dated 12 November 1968, exempt per (b) (3)(a) (sources and methods), (b) (6) (privacy) and (b) (1) (properly classified) of the Frcedom of Information Act, as amonded. (2). Memorandum dated 21 November 1968, exempt per (b)(5) (b) (CIA Act of 1949) and (b) (1) (properly classified) of the Frecdom of Information Act, as amended. Cable dated 20 February 1970, exempe (b) (3) (b) (CIA Act of 1949) and (b) (1) (properly classified) of the Freedom of Information Act, amended, Charles A. Briggs Chief, Services Staff Administrative - Internal Use Only - 2- --- ## Page 20 Jit 28 / 27 AM '75 22 July, 1975 1101 Pine S Philadelphia, Pi. 19104 Irbort S. Young Coordinator, Freedom of Information Act CIA Washington, D.C. 20505 IRS 75-4057 Dear Hobert Young I am writing pursuant to the Freeíon of Information Act, 9 U.S. C. Sec. 552, et suq., to request that you provide me with any ind all records, documents, memoranda, letters and any information of any type or kind and in any form concerning me that is on file, in the possession of, accessible ta, or maintained by your agercy. If for any reason you decide not to foriard to me any of the Information that I have hereby requested, I further request that you identity the nature of the information withheld and the roasons for your action, I ask you to waive any fees according to the Act which permits it when the request "is in the public interest because furishing the information can be considered as primarily benefiting the pablis.". I think this is the casc. As provided in the amended Act, I espeet to receive a reply within 10 working days. Sincerelie --- ## Page 21 SEUNLI 17 Ncrember 1976 NEMORANDUM FOR: Chairaan, Information Review Committee ATTENTION Mr. H. G. Bean, Assistunt for Information SUBJECT FOIA Appeal REFERENCES A. Initial Request dated 22 July 1975. IPS Reply dated 19 March 1976. C. Appeal Letter Received 26 April 1976. 1. Summary of Recoamendations: a . Sustain initial determination to deny in toto to requester to DO originated documents under exemptions (b) (1), (b) (3), and (b1(6) of FOIA. Remove (b) (6) fron one document; add creapcion (b)(2) to both Jocuments.. iTabs B-S and 8-6). Release additional inforzation in three originated docucents previously released in sanitized form--excised portions exempted under (b) (1), priate. Correct the names of the deciding officials in the appeal response to requesier. Advise requester that docunent B-5 super- cedes document B-o and contains the exact same information. IPS advise FBI. that document B-5 supercedes document B-d and shat the latter should be destroyed to avoid duplicate referrals in the future. Correct dates on documents 8-5 and 6. E: IMPDET CL BY 012170 SECRET CONFIOENTIAL When Beta-hed From Machments --- ## Page 22 SECRET 2. Background: On 22 July 1975 to ClA and requested all and any antormation con- cerning her maintained by CIA under the FOIA. She provided some biographic information and asked that any fees be waived. b. On 15 Decenber 1975, IPS/DDA advised DDO Thad been C. On 19 March 1976, IPS wrote to and enclosed sanitized versions of four documents, three of which were Do documents. Deletions had iven made under (b) (1), (b) (3), and (b) (6) of the FOIA. iwo additional DuO documents (those referred by the FBI) were denied in toto under the sane exemptions. The exemptions vere explained, the denying officials were identified by name, and was advised of her right to appeal. was also advised that FBI and INS ori- ginated material was being referred to the FBI and INS for their direct response to her request. When IpS listed the four documents. they droneously listed the Deputy Director of Security as denying document 1 and Chief, Services Staff as responsible for documents 2 3, 4, 5, and 6. In fact, the Deputy Director of security was the denying official of document & and Chief, Services Staff for documents 1, 2 3, 5, and 6. OGC should point out and correct this error in their letter to requesterl. d. In an undetal torter received by CIA on 26 April 10 subsectaon (a) (6) of the forA. appealed the decisions pursuant 3. Reconnendations: Tabs B-1 thru B-3, B-S, and B-d contain the documents constituting the DDO appeals refer to these tabs for my recommendations concerning individual documents. Z SECRET CONFIDENTIAL When Polached From Atiachments --- ## Page 23 SECRET b. As stated in Paragraph ic above, 1 recommend that OGC, in their lotter to requester, correct the previous error in identifying the dcciding officials. c. Document B-6 is a CSC! chat transmits an accumulative machine listing to the FBI. document is updated periodically and previous listings shuuld be destroyed. Document B-S the updated and final machine listing for 1970 and superceded document B-6 which been destroyed. I recommend that OGC advise requester that document B-S supercedes document B-o and contained the exact sire information. further recommend that IPS dras this matter to the attention FBI so future duplicate referrals may be avoided. d. A classification revier of the five documents listed in Tab B has been conducred. are properly marked and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 11652, as anended. All non-exempt information has boen identified and recommended for release to roquester. The FBI and INS documents pertaining to Subject located in DDO files have been referred in writing to the respoctive agencies for their direct response to requester. (See Tab C). of OGC has concurred in these 4. • recommendattons. DDO Appeals Officer Attachments: Tab A = References A-C Tab B = Documents Tab C = NIS & FRI B1, B2, B3,BS, and 66 Referral Letters SECRET CONFIDENTIAL When sia hed From Attachments --- ## Page 24 king Copy Gene F. Wilson Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Gene Wilson, •On 23 March, 1976 I received some matorial on myself from your files which only partially answored my request for information. Your letter Indicated that an appeal should he directed to you. This lotter consitutes that appeal pursuant to subsection (a) (6) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) . As provided for in the dee, I will expect to receive a reply within 20 working days. Sinccrely, ArR 26 7 55 AH '76 --- ## Page 25 14-00000 0 091 18 April 1977 NENOR IN DUM FOR: FRON SUBJECT REFERENCE Chief, Information and Privacy Staff Chief, ISS/Policy and Information Coordination Group American Voluntcer Group: American Voluntary Guerrillas: Alternate Voluntary Government; requested by Terry Catchpole Request No. F-77-147 Subject organizations have been checked with all components that night have an interest.or a record. The search revealed no records in this Directorate pertaining to subject organizations. 15 CONRDEVTAL --- ## Page 26 F-77-147 JF. (pls vick) CODUO OU 70.097 288$68.0900 March 7, 1917 Log/F sient rcedom of Information Coordinator contral Intelligence Agency l'ashington, D.C. Hear Sir. This 19 a request under the Freedom of Information Act as amended (5U,S.C.- lection 552) • Briefly, my request is for information that may be in your files pertaining o a U.S. paramilitary organizntion known varlously as the American Volunteer Viroup, American Voluntary Guerrillas or Alternate Voluntary Government (all AVG). As you know, the amended Freedom of Inforsation Act provides that if parts of a filé are exempt from release, "reasonably segregable" portions shall be provided. I therefore request that, if you determine that some of the requested information is exempt, you provide de lmediately with the Information 1. hat can be mde available. Of course, I reserve my right to appeal any such decisione pertaining to "exempt" material. I am prepared to pay reasonable costs for locating this information. DRO seR? lerrel Terry (Catchpole, Managing Editor --- ## Page 27 CONCENTAL 10 May 1977 MEMORIVDUM FOR FROM SUBJECT REFERENCE Chief, Information and Privacy Staff Chief, Policy and Insurmation Coordination Group. Peter A. Schey Request - Ku Klux Klan, et al, at Camp Pendleton, California F 77-025* The files of this Dircetorate have been scarched with regard to the listed organizations' connection with Camp Pendicton, California and the result is negative for each organization. CONFIDENTIAL C2 INDET SI DULLIIDO --- ## Page 28 577-025 - iK Pls acknowledge LAIN OFFICES OF LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO, INC. SOUTHEAST OFFICE 3O%0 INHERIAL AVENUE SAN DIECO, CALMORNIA 92102 (784) 239-9137 January 13, 1977. .t? le win led flat if he parsists in NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY Fort George G. Meade Mid. 20755 CHIEF OF NAVAL CPERATIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Washington D.C. 20350 Attn- OP-09318 DEFENSE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE DS4A Hashington D.C. 20301 NATIONAL SÉCURITY COUNCIL Attn. Staff Secretary Old Executive Office Building washington D.C. 20506 PEDIRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION U.S. DÉPARTMENT OF JUSTICE '9 th and Penn Ave. Ni Washington D.C. 20535. DIRECTOR DEFENSE INTELLICENCE AGENCY Attn: SC (FOIA) Mashington D.C. 20303. 3e. DIRECTORATE FOR FREEDOM OF INFORGATION Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) Room 2C757. Pentagon, Washington D.C. 20301 CIA FREEDOM OF INFORUATION COORDINATOR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCY AGENCY Washington D.C. 20505 RE: FREEDOM OF INFORKATION REQUEST TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act as amended (5 U.S.C. S552). He had "my file' reguet 75-5938 JAw 17 35 PH '77 --- ## Page 29 88.8!T. Page 2 (continued) an writing this letter on behalf of mysclf and and Reporter Publications. Pursuant to tne Frcedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C, $552; as amended by Pub. L. 93-502, 88 Stat: 1561, we wish to obtain access to and the opportunity to copy the following documents: All directives, memoranda, letters, orders, reports. memoranda of telephone on ether one hich eludie to treen Camp Pendleton Parine Base, California: a. b.. Ku Klux Klan: California Ku Klux Klan; United Klans: Knights of the Ku Klux Klan; e f. United Klans of America; Southern Ku Klux Klan; White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan; White. Brotherhcod; United Klans of America Knights of the Ku Klux Klan: Minutemen: Secret Army Organization; Christian Crusade Church; American Rangers; n. Invisible Empire of the Ku Klux Klan; Christian Defense League; The National States Rights Party: California Anti-Communist League; Christian National Alliance; American Volunteers Group: Provisional Naticnal Government of the U.S.A.; American Nazi Party: v. W.: National Socialist White Peoples Party; Leagion of Justice; Operation Unicorn-And other similar groups. 2. All directives, memoranda, letters, orders, reports. investigations, studies, or other records, including written memoranda of telephone conversations, which relate to the foundation, existence, activities, operations, size, member- ship or presence of any of the organizations named in No. I above in the United States Marine Corp. 3. All directives, letters, memoranda, orders, reports. investigations. or other records which describe, analyze or otherwise relate to rascism at Camp Pendleton Marine Base. --- ## Page 30 14-00000 Page 3 (continuc) All directives, letters, memoranda, orders, reports, investigations or other records which describe, analyze or otherwise relate to rascism in the United States Marine corp. Since none of the statutory exonptions Erom the Freedon of Information Act's matidatory disclosure provision applies. access to the requested records should be granted within ten (10) working days. y In the unlikely event, however, that access is denied to any part of the requested records, please describe the deleted material in detail and specify the statutory basis for the denial as well as your reasons for believing that the alleged statutory justification exists in this casc. Please also state your rcasons discretionary power to release the requested documents in the public interest. le also request that you waive any applicable fees since disclosure will meet the statutory standard for such waiver in that it would clearly be "in the public interest because furnishing the information can be considered primarily benefiting the general public". S U.S.C.A. $552(a) (4) (A). Should ,any procedural problem arise as to this request, please call me (collect) TRO: 229017 J0rst 70011 Attorney at Law TERESA. ORTIZ ROTARY PUBLIC - CALFORNIA Princial Ollica, San D.aea Co. Call My Commission Exp. Der. %, 1979 Tell 443199399773 PAS: pen- Subscribed and sworn to before me on January 14, 1977. OTAR мст Слі THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. --- ## Page 31 LAN OFFICES OF LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO, INC. SOUTHEAST OFFICE 3040 16:PERIAL AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CALIFONNIA 9Z10I (784) 239-9837 January 13, 1977 NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY Fort George G. Heade Md. 20755 CHIEF ON NAVAL OPERATIONS DEPARTRIENT CF THE NAVY Washington D.C. 20350 Aten. CP-09818 COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES MARINE CORP. Department of the Navy Washington D.C. 20350 DEFENSE INVESTICATIVE SERVICE DS4A Washingtori D.C. 20301 NATICNAL SECURITY COUNCIL Attn. Staff Secretary Old Executive Office Building Rashington D.C. 20506 FEDERAL SUREAU OF INVESTIGATION U.S. DEPARIMENT OF JUSTICE 9th and Penn. Ave. NW Washington D.C. 20535 DIRECTOR DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Attn: SC. (FOIA) Washington D.C. 20301 DIRECTORATE FOR FREEDO: OF INFORMIATION Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) Roor 20757, Pentagon, Washington DC 20301 CIA FREEDO:1 OF INFORMATION COORDINATOR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Washington D.C. 20505 RE: FREEDOM OF INECRIATION REQUEST TO WHOM IT HAY CONCER': if printro an Ankate Fallarina narenne and --- ## Page 32 Page 2 (continuca) organizations: illiam Bishop, 6202 Capestone, Dallas, Texas Grenoiv Coffoc. 1521 wellstone Place, St. Louis, Mo. Eddie Page, Jr., Bay Springs, Mississippi, D.R. Hunter, 2715 Drewry Lane, North Carolina, Ricky McGilvery, 6202 Capestone, Dallas, Texas Willian Spencer: S1l Henry Place, High Point, N.C. H. Fletcher, 2222 Superior, Detroit, Mich. Clarence Capers. 209 Powder Mill Lane, Edgewater Park, Phil. Anthony Matthews, 3904 E. 155th, Cleveland, Ohio Carlton Goodlett, President, National Newspaper Publishers Association - Black Press of America, 1366 Turk Street, San Francisco, CA 94115° Reporter Publications, 1366 Turk Street, San Francisco, CA 94115. Military Liw Office, National Lavyers Guild, San Francisco, CA. Pursuant to the Freedom of Infornation Act, 5 U.S.C. 5552, as amended by Pub. I. 93-502, 88 Stat. 1561, they wish to obtain access to and the opportunity to copy the following documents: All directives, memoranda, letters, orders, reports, investigations, studies or other records, including written memoranda of telephone conversations, which relate to the formation, existence, activities, operations, membership, size or presence of any of the following organizations at Camp. Pendleton Marine Base, California: =. b. C. d. f. 9. Ku Klux Klan; California Ku Klux Klan: United Klans; Knights of the Xu Klux Klan; United Klans of America; Southern Ku Klux Klan: White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan; White Brotherhood: United Klans of Merica Knights of the Ku Klux Klan: Minutemen: Secret Army Organization: Christian Crusade Church: Averican Rangers; Invisible Empire of the Ku Klux Klan; Christian Defense League; --- ## Page 33 Page 3. (continued) The National States Rights' Party; california Anti-connunist Loague: Christian National Alliance: American Voluntcers Group; •Provisional National Covernment of the U.s.n.g American Nazi Party: National Socialist White Peoples Party; Leagion of Justice, Operation Unicorn And other similar groups. 2. - All directives, nemoranda, letters, orders, reports, investigations, studies, or other records, including written memoranda of telephone conversations, which relate to the foundation, existence,. activities, operations, size; member ship or presence of any of the organizations named in No. 1 above in the United States Marine Corp 3: All directives, letters, meroranda, orders, reports. investigations.or other records which describe, analyze or otherwise relate to rasciom at Camp Pendleton Marine Base. All directives, letters, menoranda, orders, reports, investigations or other records which describe, analyze. or otherwise relate to rascism in the United States Marine Corp. Since "hone of the statutory exemptions from the Frcedom of Information Act's mandatory disclosure provision applies, access to the requested records should be granted within ten (10) working days. In the unlikely event, however, that access is denied to any part of the requested records, please describe the deleted material in detail and specify the statutory basis for the denial as well as your reasons for believing that the alleged statutory justification exists in this case. Plcase also state your reasons for not invoking your discretionary power to release the requested documents in the public interest. We also request that you waive any applicable fees since disclosure will meet the statutory standard for such waiver in that it would clearly be the public interest because furnishing the information can be considered as primarily benefiting the general public". 5 U.S.C.A. $552(a) (4) (A). Should any procedural problem arise as to this request, please call me (collect) so await vour progat reply. Attorney at Law --- ## Page 34 10 March 1976 VENORANDUN FOR: Chief, Information and Privacy Staff SUBJECT: REFERENCE: A. Request No: 75-4508 B. OS Referral dated & Decemhor 1975 This Directorate mintains a filo on The following paragraphs describe no results or a review of this file and tho other record holdings of this Mirectorato. There are s1x FBI documonts identifiable to Mr. Attached is a list of the descriptivo data for those documonts that should be referrod to the FBI for thetr dotermination. The following documents may not be passod to Mr. Document and Date 1 Cablo, 12 July 1970 & rispatch, 28 July 1970 I Dispatch, & August 1970 •Cable, 20 Fobrussy 1970 nispatch, 19 Play 970 fi Cable, In May 1972 Exemption (6) (1) (11a1s0n), (b) (3);. (b)(6) (D) (1), (b) (3), (0)(6) E2 IMPDET CL BY 012170 --- ## Page 35 The document referred to this Diroctorate by the Offico of Security should bo returned to then for their revier. The document concerned is a list of names of people who traveled to Cuba to cut sugar cane, dated 18 May 1973. For tuther guidance on this 11$t, please see DDO/PIC memorandum,. dated 5 March 1976 Subject: Documents Rolating to the Vencoremos Brigade. Chardos A. BY 889 chiof, Services Staff Attachment: A/S Cc: OPS/ITC LA --- ## Page 36 3 0) PN'75 Robere S. Young roodon of Information Coonlinitor entral Intelliganco Agercy rington DO 20505 INS 75-4508 alor the provisions of 5 Use 552, tho Froudom of Information Act, requost: accoss to, and copios of all flion and docimonts main alrod by tho CIA rolating to aysolf. sy photographs and fingorprint flles which you may have. I, purchance, you rule that portlons of these files aro "roasonably orrogable!" I roquest copies of thu romnining material and roservo ij right to appoal any such doletions. is, perchanco, this roquast is dended in wholo or In part, ploase nform me of tho appropriate appeals procodiro. 'I delotions are made, please cite the statutory justification for rachi deloted itom. : an submitting my full none, date and place of birth and Social ¡ocurity Tumber. proparod to pay a roasonable foe for the reproduction of this matorial. s required by 5 USC 552, I oreot to hoar from you within 10 sorking dayso Sincoroly yours; --- ## Page 37 5 Parch 1976 BIENORANDUM FOR: Chiot, Information and Privacy Staff SUBJECT: Documents Reinting to the Vencerchos Brigade 1. This Dircetorate is unablo to locate or to acknovledgo origin of the following ruports contalned In tho files of tho Offico of Sccurity: Tho Venceremos Prigade a Report - J1 May 197001. List of namos of Peoplo Who Travoled to Cuba to Cut Sugar Cano dated 18 May 1963. thoroforo decline to rulo on the releascabilley of thesé tro documents on FOIA and PA requosts, and ask that these documents not be roferred to us for action. From che nortions forwarded in connection with specific requests, there lould appear to be no renson for denying the inforantion. He defor, however, to os for a final. Judgenent. DDO/PIC EZ IMPDET CL BY 012170 CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Page 38 11174 27 October 1971 MEMORINDUS FOR: Chief, Information ind Privacy Staff (U) FROM Robert. l. Owen (U) UDo Inforration kerior Officer SUBJECT REFERENCE P-77-0140 (U) (U) A scarch of the DDO rocords systems has pinduced nine documents whose recommended disposition is as follen's: b. (U) Six documents are denied in toto. (Tab A, Document Nos. 1-6). (U) Document Nos." and & should be referred to the FRI; No. and Document 9. should ho referred to the .. Department of state. (Tab B) Robert F. Owen (U) Attachments: a/s cc: • ISS/1PG/SCB (V) ii. ADMINISTRATIVE- INTERNAL USE ONLY When Detached: from Attachments 1.?. ... 012170 SECRET --- ## Page 39 Central Intelliaeuce Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear People at the CJ.A.,. My name is I live at I am requesting under the Freedom of Information Act all information pertaining to me in your igency. files and records purs trulyr affirm that all in formation. provided above pertaining to myself is correct. On this 41 dan af January before porsonally appeared ridicidn" 1 mento a are real did to ti perdentid. State of New York, Wyoming County Commission Expires bisich 30, 1014 --- ## Page 40 20 April 1976 MEMORANDUN FOR: Chlof, Information and Privacy Staff SUBJECT: A Quaker Action Group REFERENCE: Request No. F. 76-211 A reviow of the filos of this Directorate re- vealed the documents discussed below concerning Subject. Documents which may be released in their ontiraty consist of twenty-four overt Items; copies attached. (Documents 1-24) One document dated July 1971 may not be released t 1s exempt under (b)(1) and (b) (3) (liaison), FOIA. : (Docúment 25) momorandum datod 8 November 1976 (Document 26) consists entirely of a direct quote from an FBI report datod 30 May 1907, Washington; D..C.: Sublect: Protost Activity In Washington, D. C.. Ry A Quaker Action Group Beginning May 26, 1967; no file. This report should be. referred to the FBI for relesse. In addition there are elghty-seven other FBI documents which are not boing listed sinco your offico has advised that the FBI also has a roquest on Subject. (Documents 27-114.) Charles A. Br18xs Chiof, Services Staff Attachments: NS E2 IMPET CL BY 012170 CONADENTIAL --- ## Page 41 Ris. Young Cleani Intelligence mine: martial, D.C. 20505 F 76-211 Dear Sir: This is a request unda= the Freedom of Information rico, 5 V.5.c. 552, we, et. sed., on behalf of n quaker resion the undersianed, were the authorized sificers at the time of the dissolution of the organtiation. no request that you drovide us. with any and all records, documents, letters, or any other tyoe of kind of intormation concerning our groug that is currently on file, in possession of, or maintained by your agency. The full name of the organization in d quater desion It was also knon sy initlals, dads. crcantration var establlahod in 1905 and existed until The main offica ves maintained at 20 south 1241 capes in Philadelphia, PA. is for any raison you debormine nos to farcard to w. and of the Informition tas Na have boroby requested, e mother request that you identify the nature of the income mion silthheld and the reasons for your actions. ¿s you know. the arosed de. ocanier you to reduce du waive the foes 1E that "Is In tho public interest i mause furnishing the Information can bo considered as primacily bonefiting the oubiic." this request olainly fits that caingory and ask you wave any fees.. se providod fo= in the anenand hct, werill excast to recolve. a raoly within li days. sincerely, --- ## Page 42 CONFIDENIA: 23 June 1976 NENORIADUN FOR: Chief, Infornation and Privacy Staff FROM Chirles M. Briggs Chief, Services Staff SURJECT REFERENCE for. "A Quaker Action Group" A. 0S Referral R. Request No. F 76-211 The dispatch dited 18 April 1068, referred to this Directorate by the Office of Security has heen revicwed. Release of the document is denied under exemptions. (b) (1) and (b)(3) of the 1011. Charles A. Briggs CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Page 43 SECRET 29 September 1977 MENORANDUN FOR. Chairman, Infornation Review Committeo (U) ATTENTION SUBJECT Mr. H. G. Bean, Assistant for Information (U) COps 1P7e-2m0 () CIPS -F REFERENCES Initial Request Letter, 22 March 1976 (U) B. C. IPS Response, 20 July 1976 (U) Appeal Letter, 23 August 1976 (U) 1. (U) Summary of Recommendations: Sustain initial denial in toto of two DDO documents under exemptions (b) (1), (b) (3) and (b)(6), as applicable. : (Tabs 3 and 4). b.: Relcase portions of ten DDO documents found during the appeals review, citing exemptions (b)(1), (D) (3) and (b)(G), is applicable, for the deletions. (Tabs 5-14). Deny in toto one DDO document located during the appeals review. citing exemptions (b) (1), (b) (3) and (b) (0) as the justification: (Tab 15). Rofer a list of 88 FBI Documents to the FBI for review and direct response. (Tab 16). Refer one Department of the Army document to them" for review and direct response. (Tab 17). • f. Five NSA-originated items have been referred to NSA for review. (Tab 18). CONFICENTIAL Whe Detached From o Attachments SECRET --- ## Page 44 SECRET 2. (U). Background: 2 .. Subject submitted a request under FOlA, on 22 March 1976, for any and all information the held on "A Quaker Action Group"' also known as "AgAnC" In the 20 July 1976 initial response, 24 newspaper clippings and one leaflet were released to him; two documents were denied. .D.. On 23 August 1976 Subject appealed, requesting that further information be relcased to him on the group. c. During the appeals review ll additional documents were located and are included in the recommendations below. These documents were not considered during the initial review since they were not considered to meet the criteria "records" extant at that time and they contained onzy incidental references to the subject of the roquest. d. During the appeals review we were unable to identify any Air Force documents concerning the subject of this request. The requester should be told that this was apparently an error. During the appeals review we were unable to identify any bepartment of State documents concerning A Quaker Action Group. possibly referred to in the statiad cumponse, do no, and concern A Quaker Action Group. The requestor should be inforned that this was also apparently an error. 3. (C) Recommendations: My specific recommendations are shown on the Appeals Review Form attached to each document. A classification review has been conducted and all documents are considered properly classified and marked in accordance b. I recommend that the two documents denied in toto under the initial review continue to be denied. One of them (Tab 3) could identify a still active and sensitive source. The other (Tab 1) was obtained through a sensitive operation conducted jointly by. American German authorities. SECRET --- ## Page 45 C.. I reconnend that portions of ion additional doctrents lointed during the appeals revier be rcleased Exceptions (b)(1), (b)(3) and (D) (6) should he cited, as arplicable, to the deniod portions: Specific recognendations on each of these documents is reflected in the attached Appeals Revice Forms. (Tabs 5-14): One additional document located during the amcals revice should he denied received from a foreign liaison service. in tuto, since: it wag (Tab 15). e. 88 FAT docurents located during the initial revies, but not referred to the lal, should he referred to the FBI in triting for review ind direct response. These documents are listed under Tab 16. f. One Department of the Army document should be referred in writing to them for revicw and direct response The title paye: anc a description of the document are itanched. as Tab li. Fire irs. for revich. (Tab 18). items from NSA have been refered to them by n. scroral other documents turned up during both the initiat revich and the appcals review should be considered not responsive to the request since they rofer te & hc generic term "Quaders" hut not to "A quater Arsion Group". 15 specified in the request. (Tao 1?). 4. (il) recommendatio ns.. of O6C has. concurred in the above Richard Hagner DDO Appeals Officer (U) Atrachments: Tab A - Initial Letter Tab 6. 1'S Response Tab C oneal Letter Tabs 3-19 • See Revick Forms COORDIVATION FA/OEM<FOI ISS/IPA/SCR EUR/EXO nex DATE 211/12 30/9/27 30c722 SECAFT --- ## Page 46 pi.. 16 99? 1975 ARDIORA:DOY FOR: SURJECT: REFERENCE: Chief, Information lovier stast Request An. 75-801 1. This Nonetorses naintains e personalley dossier A roview rE this file and other records of this circetorate reveal tie folloring infor- nailon pertinent to subject: A few FBI documents, tich are excluded under 1900.3 (u) (1) of the Eodoral Perister. office that raintains the information on subject is unable to further iloncify these documents. nort intoration provided by a joint Dopartnont of the Army and forcign liaison opera tion abroal. This materinl is considered exenpt under 5B (1) 08 8.0. 11552 And 1000.3 (x)(1) and (3) 0f the Foileral Registor. nation Tio igency dispatches based on infor- Frog unilateral and liaison murces a- brons concerned Subject's travel to Cubr. This material considered exempt indet: (b) (3) 08 FOlA 3nd 53 (1) OfF.D. 11652. Ons memorarium to the FOI reporced Subject's travel as mentioned in paragraph 1.c. 130ra. This naterial is considered exompt for reason in paragraph l.c. tinve. Form 3535 is attached. iltacineat FOrT 3535 !?". Л! Arless Charles Brlugs Chief, Services Stass CONG pond: --- ## Page 47 14-00009 Freedon of Intoration Coordinator contral latelligenes Agency hashington, b.C. 205CS Gentlemais The Office of the Deputy Attoric! General referred me to I formally requess Crio has aboat 2oo. Be rare is to see in and all socoration, urs Thank you cc. Office of Congressman Toly Motfitt --- ## Page 48 SECRET 28 0ds 875 NAIIN PORS ATTATION & SURVITE Chatree, taforens ten lovier Countster Mr. W.G. Boan, Speculive Socretary POLA APPRAL - PaLlo A. StaRerson Rogue e L dated I AprIl L9TS Ors/ITo Nano dared 14 Hay 1975 DO/AS 175-190 decod Le May 1975 IES 75-801 decod 30 May 1975 Appeal 1. dated 26 Juna. 197S Ops/IrG Mario dared 1S July 1973 The lastial request and salvernont appeal by Agoncy'e corruspondenco to him, and the documence that percata have been revieved and the documate savolved are an follori ni B 561, 11 Auguas 1969 tho HHMA-37509• 10 July 1969 € I001A-37416, 23 June 1969 do Headquarters 876, 26 June 1969 •. MRXICO CITY 329, 23 June 1969. ACHICO CITY 330, 24 June 1969 R-3663, 24 Octobor 1969 TH-559888, 26 August 1969 Itera, b and c. Iron the Lot 1n paragruph 1. vero tha basis of che tristial reponso and dostall (Bofarenco d.), Itess d. and as do not meniton| by nano but are ralative and are tacluded for bockground informatiog. evallabla itll afear the lalciel resposad and cherafore vare not conaidared la that reply. On cho bants of our revie, ve balleve Item do, b. and e- ver properl mempted ta secord iRs (b) (I) Bad (D) (3) of C POLA Bed S3(1) ol 5.0, 11632. Thie was raported Ra Ratorence d. on 30 Kay 1975. Aintalatrative-Istaroi? l'se Only inen Separated iron Actacharate. --- ## Page 49 ¡SECRET Doinite the detafled explanation provided vo note ls lils latter of appeal that bo continuea to sual a baile lor cha ductason. Uita resara to these jocusence, se ballove and agree thee rulesolng than would violate procoction of venuitive soureso and tachode. The orifinal destal te corroct in sould te sheld by the Icformation Revie Corniecee. Our rever of the renaloing ibree documento (itons f., %. and ho) resulted la the inliolas recimendations. MP 559605. A passenser lat stiles tie Agency apparently obtatred through foralga klatoon Tun esture of cae infomation not poride segregating and releasias farta of the latI Ne believe the document 1a exampt under (b) (1), (b) (3) Of tie FOLA and 58(1) of B.O. 11692. D. MEXICO CITY 330. Provides tco sano information ao R4A-37509 nos 1o, thorofore, axemps under the sane execptiona cited in the origioal deutal. 10. (b)(1), (D) (3) and JB(1). 1-3603. de ballera carrala surts of lads 15-page docuco. an bo sagrogatal aud maladead No agree wilà its on ¿he selectad portiona that abould be exirectad for raloana (dec attached marked copy). The balanoe of the commoc, bonver, mar be considared ereipt under (3) (3)(a) 81d (D) (6) of the POLA: la sunary, it la recosmanded that the appeal be denied and tha exasptions iphald on all tha rolated documents as liatod above except in che CaBa 01 EX-3663. The paloctad porEsons ahould be santelzai and providad to _ This recommandacion has boon siscussad with Odi and ho concura vich our docialoa. 131 DiO Appeale Officer Attachmenta: a/s ISG/EXEC 30 July 1975 Distribution: Urig. & 1 - Addressee 1 - ОСС (Мт. Макошка) 1 - C/IRS 2 = DDO/FIO 1 - ISG, w/o arts. 1 - Chrono, w/o arts. 2 --- ## Page 50 15 M1 ps MENORISDON FOR: SUBJECT REFERENCE Freedom of Infornation Officer, D00 IKS 7S-801 (Appeal) Request foi Agenes doctents Nttached are the thirce Agency docments Listol in our monorandun of 14 May 1975: a. Agency dispatch INNA-3::16, dated: 23 June 1969. This covering dispatch does not sention Subject by man; Subject's photograph was forwarded as an attachnent to this disputch. Two other attachnones listing Subject's name on too flight manifests are not available here, but the reference to his travel from Mexico city to Cuba had beon incorporated into a Spocinl Channel memorandun to the FBI, S-501, dated 11 August 1909 (paragraph id of Our 14. May memorandum). b. agency dispatch IM:l-37509, dated 10 July 1909 listed requestor as a traveler to Cuba and listed his passport number. It also forwarded a copy of his passport in an atrachment which is not ararlable here. Special Channel Memorandum B-561, dated 11 August 1969 (sce paragraph la abore). 2. He belicro that the nbove mentioned documents have been properly crempted in our 14 May manorindun under (b)(1) 5(B) (1) (foreign liaison, in this cass, tho sections of liaison) and: (b)(3). The muterial is not segregable for re- lease, as the miure of the information and its format are such that the requester could determine that the information doneeryans him was obtained by the Auchey through surreptitious Relerso would thus violate protection of sensitive sources and nothods CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Page 51 CONFIDENTIAL One more docaone (nos intoxed into thie 201 file or in) other records of this office) has become availible: Transmittal Manifest soosss, dated 28 August 1969L This manifest lists Subiece imong passergers striving from Cab.d. No covering dispatch was used ind no source is given, but the information our bo oresumed to have been provided by forcin linison Thc and is cortainly crempt under (b) (3) The fornit and the nature information do not maxe it feasible to segrogite and relcase it/ 4. Attached is a segrogable portion of internal Agency memorandum Ex-3005, dated 2a Detober 1009. This docunent is it 25 page paper and ¡ofors briefly to requestor, repeating in part the reference to roquestors travel is reported in INMA- 37500 (Daragranh 1h abovole The exeised portion of the dochnent is considered exempt under (b) (3)(a) and (D) (6). 5. Also attached are copies of three additional Agency cables. 1550, dated 24 June 1909, is referred to in 10111-57509 (paragraph tb above), and provides the same information (except for copies of passports). The reference cited in this cable, in turn, is Headquarters 876, dated 24 June 1969, which requested that names and passports of groups traveling to Cuba be cabled, as the information was urgently needed for a paper being prepared for the White louse. This cable in turn refers to 7320, dated we shich explains the run tenderers ation Although Hoadgurters 870 do not mention requestor by name they rached for background information. Chief, international Torrorisn Croup Operations staff Merichments: it/5 --- ## Page 52 3Wn conchates D.0. 483050 12881 this =. *corney agreat chis decisione crould line to dies aLisio for male croister. irish te advice that taking the adrian do counscio Sincerais Cc. Congresanon Cory MetfetE --- ## Page 53 14-00000 CoM 12 Decomber 1975* -MEMORANDUM FOR $ SUBJECT: RE PE RENCE: Chief, Informacion and Privacy Stuff Roquent No. 75-1161 1.: This Directorato maintains an officlal file on Subject. A review of thla file and other records reveals. the folloring information pertinent to Subject: Twenty-nine FBI documents, Seo attached 11sting. Five Agency documents (one cable and three dispatches) concorned Subjoce's travel and activitlos abroad and transmitted information Ono special channel (B) menorandun forwarded meterlal provided 1 to the PRI. of this materlal to considoted exeript under pOlA, (b) and (D) (3). Five Agoney documenta (one cablo, three dispatches, srid one fold Information report) To- terrod to Subjoct's travols and activities abroad. The nature of the Inforation could Identify the source 1f 1t were released. Ono RL memorandum, one spocial channel (B) memorandum and one CSCI memo- randum forwarded this Anforantion to the FBI. Ono scl memorandun forwarded a report to the U. S. Intelligence Community All of this natorial 13 considered exempt under (b)(3), sources and nothods and (b)(1) properly classified. One agency dispatch forwarded Information on Subtect's activitios abrond provided by a U. source. This material •s exempe under HOlA (b) (1) properly classifled and (b)(3), sources and methods. F2 IMPDET CI. BY 012170 CONMIOEAOAL --- ## Page 54 Pour Internal offico memoranda (EX) per- tained to Subject's travols, contacts and activi. The source of throo of these was information from the FBI; the source of ono of theao was the Deparimens of Seate nesorandum to CIA dated 1 Feb- TUATY 19713 All of these are exempt under FOIA (b) (J), sources and methods, and (b) (1). One Incemal office memorandun contains a Mating of Subject's foreign travel. It was Caken fron a composite of all-sourco information, In- cluding foreign sources and is considered exe inder lolA (5), and and (bel. One Internal office (EX) nemorandun con- cerning subject's background and activitios, which included material fron the FBI, an Agency fleld Information report fron a unilateral source and an Agency dispatch forwarding information provided by a This memorandum considered exompt under 70IA (b) (3) and (b) (1). The following documents with sterilized segrosshlo portions attached are considored relesseable to Subject under the FOIA. CSCI memorandun dared 17 May 1968: oxeised portions exempt under FOIA (h) (6), personal privacy, (h) (3) and (b) (1). b. Incornal offico (BX) memorandum dated 14 July 19671 excised portions exempt under FOIA (b)(6), personal privacy, (b) (3) and (h) (1). Internal offico memotandum (EX) datod 26 Anril 1968: excisod portions exempt under FolA (b (o) personal privacy, (b) (3) and (b) (1) Incornal office menorindun (RX) dated 10 July excised portions erempt under FOLA (b) (6), personal privacy, (b) (3) and (b) (1). Attachment to a dispotch dated 23 November excised portions exempt under (h) (6), personal privacy and (b) (1). Dispatch exempt under (b) (3 "sources methods and (b) (1). --- ## Page 55 1121 Dispatch dated as November 1965. excise portions exempt under FOIA (5)(1) and (D) (S) Attached aro coples three documonts whiel may be used In obtaining revlows by the originatin agencies! Department of Army • ACSI-DSCC Momorandu dated 8 July 1966 • Subtoet: Transnietal of. Sun- marlos of Infomation: Department of Stare toleran Coponhagen 2014 dated 21 November 1967 Departnent of Stato mamorandum dated 1 February 1971 fron Director, Passport Office re garding Subject. FBI. Cable from Director, dated 6 November 1968, Subject. Washington Mobilization Committee to End War in Vietnam. ^1. 11235 Charles A. Briggs Chief, Services Staff Attachments: NS cc: OPS/ITC --- ## Page 56 denatticutton c: FAl documents nuntioningl TAS 75-1161, 30 April 19:5. 1- Report dated 23 June: 1965, Detroit, Michigan; (no file nunbers) subject: communist Infiltration of Students for a Denocratic Society 2. Report dator6 August 1965, Detroit, Nichigan; Subject: no buttle file • по FOF 1): Report dated - 8 October 1965, Detroit, Michigan PLe: 100-53032• Bufile 105-142056; Subject: - Security Natter - SDS firert dated 6 December 1965, lashington, 105-142056 (no Bufile #) Subject: Security Matter 5. 6. S.. 9. 10. Report dated 17 Maj 1966, hashington, D.C.; Subject: no. file a) Report dated 17 May 1966, Nashington, D.C.; Subject: International Days of Protest, March 25-26, 1966 (no file *) Report dated Re: 20 May 1966. Detroit, Michigan; (no file.$) 1l. Report dated 30 June 1966, Detroit, Michigan; File # 100÷33052, Sufile 105-143056; Subject: - Security Maiter - SDS Report dated Subject: 14 September 1966 Detroit, Michigan; (no file ls) Report Nated 27 October 1966, Detroit, Michigan; burile 105-1+3056, Field office file 100-25032; Subject: Natter - Students for a Democratic Society Security Rebort dated Subject: FOF 35 stober 1960. Detroit,: Nichigan; [no Bufile, no --- ## Page 57 CON REMEL 12.1 Report dated 8 June 1967 Fieta office fuic c1 100-13602, Outane 100-138262 Subject: "13. Report dated (no file fs) Subject: 7 July 1967, Detroit, Michigan; Students for a Democratic Society. 14. Report dated File H 105-11627; Butile 62-110030. ZZuptember 1967, Detroit, Michigan; Subject: University Comnittee for Debate on Foreign Policy Inter 15. Report dated (no file is) Subject: 7 December 1967% Phoenix, Arizona; Anti-drale activities December 4-8, 1967; Demonstration at Selective Service Has, Tucson, Arizona, Deceiber 4, 1967. 16. Report dated 14 December 1967, Portland, Jregon; (no file is) Subject: Oregon Antidraft Activities, Portland, 17. Report dated 11 December 1967, Cincinnati, Ohio; Field office file CI 100-15928: Futile 105-142056. Subject: - Security Matter - SDS 18. Report dated (no file #s) Subject: 31 January 1969, Nashireton. D.C Intornal Security - CU. 19. Report dated report daice file due 196%, Cincin: to 1h2056. Subject: 20. 21. Report dated 10 October 1965, (no file Ms) Subject: washington, D.C., Foreign Travel• New left Groups - Report dated 18 November 1968, Jacksonville, Florida Field office file 105-1613 (no Bufile #) Subject: 220. Report dated Field office 12 December 1963, New York, N.Y.: File 100-115047 (no Bufile e) Subject: Students for a Democratic Society - IS - SDS Report dated : (no file is) Subject: 6 January: 1969, San frincisco, Calif.; --- ## Page 58 2S: 26. 27. 28. 29. Report dated January 1969, Cincinnati, Ohio: Fiold office file Cl 100-15928; Bufile. 105-142056. Subject: Report dated * 10 February 1909, Nashington, D.C.; (no file #s) Subject: Report dated 14 April 1969, San Francisco, Calif.; Field office file 100-55497; Butile 105-142056. Subject: - Sccurity Matter - SDS Report dated - 6 February 1970, Atlanta, Georgia; Field office file 100-7808; Bufile 105-178431. Subject: Report dated 28 January 1966,: Detroit, Michigan, Bufile 97-5029 field file 105-11615, Subject: Committee to Aid the Vietnamese: - Report dated 14 January 1966, Washington, D. C: no file numbers, Subject: Demonstrations Protesting United States Intervention in Vietnam. --- ## Page 59 Nf. Robert S. Young Freedos of Inforention Coordinator Central Intelligenco Agency, Wantington Dear ir. Young, Thank you for your loctor of upril 24, 1979, acknowledging my Freedon-of-Information request. Mero 1o the additional Information you ask for: Place of birth Date of birth: The FBI. in a sinilar reply to a simplar request, also wanted sy Social Securtty number, which you may also need. Thank you for your cooperation. Sinceroly ArR 29 7 50 RH 75 --- ## Page 60 14-00000 STATES UNITED AMERICA L April Ll, 1975 Mr. 'Inbert S. Young CIA roodom of Information Coordinator CIA idatra Langley, Va. Deark, Young, Pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Inforsation Act, plaase make available to me any materials or fians the CIA may have collected and kept on my activin ties. Sinceral SLOHY IT Y 9 | 12% --- ## Page 61 0: Deccaber 1077 MERRINDUS FOR: AFFENETON SURINGT NUTRINCIS Chrion, Tofornation Forick Coshittee (U) ir. H. to Poon, Assistane for Information (V) 1010 Appen (F 15. 1100) (U) Original Request dosen 1l April 1975 00) 11'5 Response dided 19. Fcornary 1076 (U) Appeal letter dared 24 Februd 1976 (U) 1: (V), Sporary de Recommendations: dudents Rolease additionind Incopral ion fion six 000 inipially released murerated versions. Release portions of cighe 100 detaints initialiy 1010. sustain the denial in coco of 13 a00 documenes. Release doctonts in coto nine nous itens discovered and seton Dro during the appeals radice. Daily in puro 15 p00 dorments discovered during (U) Background: •. on 11 goril 1095 requested "ay circria or tiles die flA may lage collecte? and kent en arcivities." the original 100 warch 27 DDO dieurones, 29 FBl files, one PHl. unble and thore other- agends documents. IP'S responded on 19 February 1976 --- ## Page 62 releasing six of the DDO documents and denying the remaining 21. IPS advised in segrocated versions that the non-DIO doctronts were being referred to the originating agencies for direct response to him. requestine full retire appealed on 24 February 1976 "fill withhold dirts, anil this triggered in additional scarch with the colluring restles: (1) carlier sine pres: irons, not considered under vere located. (2) 15 a resule of an exchange of referrals between the 100 and the oys, mo accented responsibility Far che documense dorred ty Tabs 28, '36, 32, 33 rerich-1.c. those covered by 13) 1s a result of a Privacy Act request levied Jon the rB!, the litter referred three 000 acmoranda, per P 76-180 Tio of these--(SCI 716/02677-67 and ESCl s16/05757-67--had not previously surfaced, but the third had been handled initially under Tab 19(H). he informed the FBl be would handle the former ino in the appoal. re-checking (2) and leiles and running down referenies. He do unant one locaten carol rese additions have resulled in a total of si 000 doements heing treated in this appeal in increase of 24 since she IP'S response, and nine picco items. (5) Four EX menoranda--895, referred to the FBI 1070, 1076 for 2197 and 3363-. coordination regarding FBI information therein. The FBI replied on 28 Morober 1076 rowarding portions to be withhold and excaptions to he applied. FJTA -18,789 daied 6 December 1965 (Tab 20) for Air Force data therein. Air Force responded on 29. Octoher 1976 relcasing its input. --- ## Page 63 3 (7) Three FAl files) in addition to those undertled during le initial sarch, pore discovered. DRC. 02629 and DHB-80223 note reierred to the FRI on 5 Ocrober 1976 for direct contact with the requester, and 180-24857 bus similarly Corarded on 26 April 1977 Three State Department doctrents were forwarled to the Forenu of Püblic arrairs on. 1 October 1976: Tho of those here spare negoranda, aldered. to the cia. Classpore rilled on 20 ocrober to advise that both had alrcad been referred The third document-rab 2l(D)-twas elcared for release by the same telephone call. c . A classificition cerios has hotn conducted on Wo documenes involved in this appead, marked to röflect this roview. inal all lure been In those cases where segregation of non-crept data has been possible, such his been dentificd is reconnonded for In chose cases whore release the documenes have been segregation of non-excupt data pertaining to him has not feasihle. 3. (U) Recommendations: See Tabs 12-45. (U) This monorandum has as yet not been coordinated the office of the Goneral Counsel. IDO Appeals nifices (U) artachments: Tab R Tibs 12-18 References - As Stated --- ## Page 64 STATES UNITED Mr. Gene F. Wilson •Central Intelligence Agency Hashington, DaC. 20505 HE: FOIA Appeal Dear Mr. WIlson, By letter dated 11 and 26 April 1975, I asked for my file. By letter dated, 19 February 1976, you respogred with sore of the requested documents. However, some censored and others were withheld altosethe.. I hereb's appeal: these deletions I look forward to hearing from you within 20 dayn, as required by law. Sincerely MAR 1 2 12 FH --- ## Page 65 CONFIDEATIAL -164 2e Decenber 1975 HEMORANDUM FOR: SUBJECT REFERENCE Chief, IPS Request Nọ. 75-4681 This Directorate maintains a file l. The folleing paragraphs describe the tricuments held by this Utrectorate which refer in her and her specific assoclation with the Group. The documents listed below are from the FBI and are exempt ger 1900:3(g) (4) of the Federal Register. "Cormittee of Returned Volunteers A July is ree of pen o to un are husber. dated Committee of Returned Volunteers (CRY)", dated 27 August 1969, from Hashington, D.C., no file number. "Committee of Returnes Volunteers (CRV) dated il September 1959, fron Mashington, D.E., no file number. Comittee of Returned Volunteers". dated: 24 Septenber 1969, no file nucter: SM-R1! e. dated 2) February 1973, from New York, V.Y., Tile number 107-339235-416. 1. "Comittee of pete med do usess, doted 14 July 197. file nurber: 100-45751. There Is one Departnent of State letter, which is a requese fror he Passoort Office Por Information of a security nature pertinentl Idates 1 February 1971. ne file nunher. although this leiter 1s expluded under 1900.3(g) (4) of the rederal legister, a copy is attached for referra! to the State repartment. E2 IMPDET CL BY C12170 CONFIDENTIAL --- ## Page 66 72-19 CONFIDENTIAL The following documents may not be passed One Agency menorandum dated 11 Auqust 1969 and one Agency Cable dated 24 June 1969 which contain Information and are exempt per (b)(1), (b)(3)(a) an b) (3) (b) of the FOlA and 5(b)(1) of E.0. 11652. b. Two Agency dispatches dated 23 June 1969 an1 10 July 1969 which contain information from the same source as. In paragraph 43 above. The same exemptions apply. 5. The following three Items may be passed coples are attached for each. In all cases. the excised portions are exempt per (b)(1) (b)(3)(a). (b)(3)(b) and (b)(6) of the FOlA. a. One Agency memorandum dated I Decenber 1971. b. One Agency dispatch dated 6 December 1971. c. One Agency dispatch dated. 30 November 1971. E. Form 3533. 1s also attached. Charles A. Briggs Chief, Services Staff Attachment: As Stated Above --- ## Page 67 4-00000 August 7, 1975 LOG S2-Reil Robert Young Freedom of Information Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Mr. Young, I understand that under the Freedom of Information Act that an organ- can seck disclosure of any and all information and documenta that the Central Intelligance Agency may have collected pertinent to lts activitles. As the resident of the now inactive, but still existant , I would 11ke to request any intormation and documents that concern the organization. Also, as an Individual I would like to reauest anv information cocerning my activities. I would appreciate iny relevant inforation that you could send along. I look forward to your reply and well as in restads to maysell Sincerelv. --- ## Page 68 SECRET 19 September 1977 ATTESTION SURJICT REFIRINCES chairman, Information Review Conmittee (U) Mr. 11. G. Bean, Assistant for Information (U) Fold Appcall Initial Request dred 7 Angust 1975 (U) ClA's Response dated 6 April 1926 7(U) C. Appeal Letter daced 5 39y 1976 (U) 1.. (U) Summary of Recommendations: Rolease additional intomation fron three documents initially relcased segregaied form. are excepted inder (olIo send 000600101e sustain initial donial in loto of four documents under exemptions (b)(1); (b) (3), (b) (0) and (b) (7) (C) of the 101A as applicable. c. Rolcase in segregated form tienty-one documents discorered in the appeal process Deleted portions are exempted under (b)(1): (b)(3), (b)(6) and (h) (7) (C) of the FOlA as applicable. "Deny in toto seven documents that here located in the appeal robier. These docents are bring denied under exemptions (b) (1), (b) (3), (b) (0) anil (h) (?) (G) of the FOlA. 0001e. Pass in into six overt documents located during the appeal revich. Refer to the FBI for their action an identification list nine additional FBl coports that nore located during the appeal revicw. Refer one document located during the appeal review.. to the Department of the Army for their action. CONNICETTW Detached From Allachments --- ## Page 69 Julics 2. (U) Background: ciA requesting On ? August 1975, wrote the concern. " an organization called the remand information and decuments that Ms. Barnes explained that thei "an inactive, but still existant" rescarch group of which she is the president. _also stated: "...as an individual I would like to request any infornation concerning my activities." b. The 6 April 1976 response stated seren blO documents form. were being released in sanitized This memorandum also stated that FBl and State Department documents had been surfaced in our search igency for action.| was also informed of her right to appeal. C. On 5 May 1976, appealed. information de unitial reviek, he seagch yas socitedono including any association with thell she search las broadened to include any information about regardless of association with it. This Tater search located additional •documents which are included in this appeal package. 3. (U) Recommendations: Tah A-1 contains nine overt documents that I recommend be released in t0t0. Tah A contains the DDO documents that were considered in this appeal case. The Appeal Review Form to each of the documents reflects. my recommendations concerning the release of the information in the document. All meaningful, non-exempt information applicable to this request has been identified and is recommended for release. A classification review has been conducted on zach of the DDO documents reviewed in this mppeal case. A DDO officer with national security classification authority has asserted that each document is marked in accordance with E.O, lio Properly classified and ., as amended. SECTIO --- ## Page 70 SLUNLI 3- c. Tab C contains the identification of nine FRI docunents that vere surfaced during the appeal search. I recommend this list be referred to the Fil. for their action. d. Tab D contains a docunent that originated with • the Department of the Army. I rocommend that it be returned to the Army for their action. Tab E contains a copy of the document that wis referred to the Department of State for their action. and a list of the FBl documents that were referred to the FRI for action on 10 March 1976. These documents were surfaced at the initial review search. Tab F contains an FBI document that contained classified information furnished by the ClA. FBI referred the document to the ClA for revier. A full text copy and a copy as approved for relense are atrached. The tuo Cla documonts that here surfaced by the FBI ind forwarded co. the CIA for action are included as docurents 32 and 35. (U) OGC has not yet concurred in those Dilen it Sheen Helen H. Stilson (U) DDO Appeals Officer (U) Attachments: - References A through C Tab A-1 - Documents to be released in toto with appeal pachage Tab - Dho documents reviewed at aupeal level Tab C - Documents for referral to FBi Tab D - Document to be reforred to Department of Army Tab E - Locuments Tab F - referred with inicial review Referral SECRE --- ## Page 71 May 5th Gene F. Wilson CIA Information Review Conmittee CLA Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Mr. Wilson, On August 7, 1975, I trade a request to the CIA under tha Freedan on Information Act for intormation, and documents _ By letter dated April 6, 1976, the agency aged to release a newspaper clipping and three censored documents. The renainder of the reguested documenta I hereby appeal the agency's denial of my request for documents on the ercunda that the exciptions relled upon do not apply to the requested docurents. In reviewing whether classifled information is tjll properly classified and therefore excripted trun disclosure uner subsection (b) (1) , you should be fomally Lisbanded three years ano. In aidtion, I have renson to belleve that the agency's initial roply is incomplete. In partferiar. the documents released by the agency c contain only one publication Tie docurents already releases Indicate that the agency was at least aware of other| publicaticis. I hereby request a copy of any catalogue, 11st or Index of these publications. As to any documents or portion of documents which are witheld after this appeal, I hereby request: (a) specification as to whether the material pertains to or to the (D) as to material withled on the basis of exemption (b) (5), names of any other agency which Initiated or received coples of Inter agency memoranda; and (e) as to the material witheld on the basis of exemption (b) (7) the authority for the law enforcernet activities of the Central Intelligence Agency and the function of the investigation. May !! ? 43 PH'76 sinierelv --- ## Page 72 2 October 75 NEMORANDUM FOR: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: Chlof, Inforsacion and Privacy Staff Request No. 75-5747 This Directorate has no file on Two Asoncy documents, however were surfaced. documonts aro deniod under (b)(l), as baing properly classified under F.O. 11652 and (U) (3) (sources and sothods) FOLA. Release of the portion concerning Subject would probably identify the source to him. Thus , these documents must be denied in full® 10/ carlo: do 966d9 Charles A. Briggs Chiof, Sorvices Stast E2 IMPDET CL SY 012170 COWaRFATI --- ## Page 73 SEP 5: 1c4 PH *75 125.75-5742 Freedom of Information Act Robert Young CIA Cordinator CIA: Wasbington D.C. 20505 106 SERPCH Dear Siro: I bava rosson to bollove the CIA may bave a record file on me • In 1961 I wag a momber of an Anti-Castro group In the Ploride Boys... timo. And resided on Fo lane Key In the Florida Keys for a Since I was A devote anti-communint at tho timo and partloipated la a raid or two (that never accomplished anything), I'm courious to see lf entthing la in print roganting my 8o oalled wild oats! days and tinder the Troudon of Information Aot I hearby respootfully request a copy of any possible filoo --- ## Page 74 & December 1975 ME LIRANDUM POR Chaiman, Infomation Revier Committee ATTEVTION: NE. H. G. Bean, Assistant for Information/DDA SUBJECT: DIA (peal REFERENCES: A. Original Request, dated 1 Sep 75 B: Reply to Subject, dated 29 Oct 75 C. ippeal letter, dated 10 Nor 75 Summary: It is recormended that the initial denial as stated in our reply of 29 Oct 75 be affirmed, based on Title 5, U.S.C. 552(b)(1), (5) (3) and (b)(0) as applie to the specific documents mentioned herein. 2. Background: a. on him. initial request bas for a copy of any Agency file b.. The original search revealed two documents Jwas denied the document in toto. appeal states that he is perplexed at why the documents were denied hin and requests the documents so that he can correct any possible misinformation in the record. 3. The tro dociezents 35e: Agency dispatch UFG: 2192, 23 kg 61 on ANCIEER/! meno of conversation and others who This dociment is denied under (b) (1) properly classified, (b) (3) protecion of sources and methods and (b) (6) protrition of the privacy of others. A representative of lal Division does not wish to declassify this dispatch, and I concur. Agency menorandim CSCI 3/707455 dated 4 pet 61 is a memoranium to the FBI containing the information in UFGI ?192 plus file traces. --- ## Page 75 14-00000 This document must he denied to protect the former deep cover asset, This document is denied under (b)(1) proper classification, (b) (3) protection of sources and methoils and (b) (6) protection of the privacy of others. A representative of l' Division does not wish to declassify this memorandum, und I concur. Reconnendation: It is recommendel that the initial denial as stated in our reply of 29 Oct 75 be reaffirmed, based on Title S. U.S.C. 552(6) (ka (b) (3) aid (b)(6) as stated above.- 5 . OCC has concurred in the above. DIO Appeals Officer Attachments: References Agency dispatch UFGA 2192, 23 Aug 61 Agency memo CSSI 3/767,435 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10113-10391.pdf
104-10113-10391
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
10/25/1977
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
[[DELETE]]CI/R&A/E
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET.
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK41 : F29 : 1993.08.09.18:02:43:000058 :
1
## Page 1 104-10113-10391 E ONLYSS ROUTING AND." SHEET SUBJEFT: (Optional) TO: (Officer deig building) - ATE RECEIVED FORWARDED XTENSION 9469 OFFICER'S INITIALS NO CT: 5005-0 -C1: 565-77 25 COMMENTS (Nümber hom, Draw o line AC/CI/R&A/E AC/CI/RGA sor signature :25 75126, 005 OCT 8197/ OCT. 9 NS 9. 91 001 1977 10 11. D/Sound „ Cat: Mage, lin 14. 15. FORM 3-32 610 ' PROVOUS Bol- -31 OCT 1977: 0S: 7 4752 SECRET SC CONFIDENTIAL' INTERNAL USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED ---
2,018
/releases/2018
124-10243-10364.pdf
124-10243-10364
04/26/2018
Redact
FBI
00/00/0000
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
105-38431-189
BR
1
FBI
NY
3/12/18
null
## Page 1 124-10243-10364 JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY: FBI RECORD NUMBER: 124-10243-10364 RECORD_SERIES: NY AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 105-38431-189 DOCUMENT INFORMATION ORIGINATOR: FBI FROM: BR TO: TITLE: DATE: 00/00/0000 PAGES: 1 SUBJECT: SEE FBI 105-82555-355 DOCUMENT TYPE: ORIGINAL CLASSIFICATION: PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT Secret REVIEW DATE: STATUS 10/29/1998 Redact NEW CLASSIFICATION: UPDATE DATE: 02/14/2001 RESTRICTIONS: JFK Act 6 (1)(B) COMMENTS: NW 50953 DocId:32186154 Page 1 --- ## Page 2 1- 30(R00.4017-631 SECRED D AIRGRAM DECODED COPY 0 CABLEGRAM ORADIO O TELETYPE Tolson Beimon: Mohr Carper Callahan Contad Detonah Evang Gaie Fiocon Sullivan Town! Troitar Tele, Room Holines an Condy LEGAT BERN NO. 240 PAGE THREE FOREGOING ADDITIONAL INQUIRY BEING MADE OF SWISS FEDERAL POLICE TO OBTAIN FURTHER CUS PERTINENT DETAILS IF ANY LEGAT PARIS ADVISED BY BERN HENRY DO GRUSH RECEIVED: 3:53 PM. MAL BND CC: IR, BRENNAN 165-38431-189 SEARCHED... INDEXED. SERIALIZED. 10s: 141994974 SECRET If the intelligence contained in the above message is to be disseminated outside the Bureau, it is suggested that it be sulchiy paraphrased in order to protect the Bureau's cryptographic systems. 50953 Doeld: 32186154 Page 2 ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10150-10004.pdf
104-10150-10004
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
10/1/68
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR OF SECURITY
BRUCE L. SOLIE, DEPUTY CHIEF/SRS
MEMO: CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS IN THE CASE OF YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO.
280
CIA
JFK
03/16/2018
JFK62 : F9 : 20040301-1051500 : MEMO, INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY; DUP OF 104-10210-10009 (ARRB RELEASE). This document contains 264 text pages and 16 tab pages, total 280 p.p.
280
## Page 1 104-10150-10004 1 October 1968 CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS IN THE CASE OF YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO --- ## Page 2 SECRET 1 October 1965 MEMORANDUM FOR: Directos of Security FRON : Deputy Chief, Socurity Rescarch Staft SUBJECT : NOSENKO, Furig Ivanovich do In accordance with the request of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, attachod is a summary with conclusions concerning the bona fides o Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENXO. Sub- conclusions are contained in tas summary concerning several majos areas which were givin pritcazy consideration la the master of the bona fidos of NOSENKO. 2. Included in this aummary are comments concerning conclusione in the previous summary and an annex containing i- marks on three separate subjecto rolated to the NOSENKO CaJe. 3. In brici, the conclusion of fbis aummary is that NOSENKO is the permon ho claims to be, thut he hold his claimed posítioas la the KOB during 1951 - Jazuary 19o1, toat NOSeNKO was z0t dis-. patched by the KGB, and that his previous lies and exaguerations aro noi actually di material signulcance as ibis tiere. Brues Li Solie Attaciment: Summary 3IS:460 0001002 SECRET --- ## Page 3 war. SECRET TABLE OF CONTENTS : 1. Introduction Summary of Developments in NOSENKO Case Since 30 October 1967 =í. Analytical Comments Concerning the Bona Fides of Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO A. Is NOSENKO Identical to the Person Whom He Claims to be? B. Is the Claimed KGB Career of NOSENKO Plausible? C, Has NOSENKO Given an Acceptable Explanation of His Motivation in Contacting CIA in 1962 and For His Defection in 1964? D. Is the Information Furnished by NOSENKO to CIA Concerning KGB Operations, Personalities, and Organization Reasonably Commensurate With His Claimed KGB Career? E. Can the Information Furnished by NOSENKO be Considered in Toto as Having Resulted in Material •Damage to the KGB and/or Has the Information Furnished by NOSENKO Been of Significant Benefit to Western Intelligence? F. Is There Evidence of KGB Deception or "Give-Away" in Information Furnissed by NOSENKO Which Would Warrant a Conclusion that NOSENKO was Dispatched by the KGB? 0001003 SECRET Cecide dom doisatia? --- ## Page 4 and to ... G. Is There Evidence of a Political or Any Other Type Objective Which Could Justify a Dispatch of NOSENKO by the KGB With Permission to Speak Freely to CIA Concerning His Knowledge of the KGB and Without NOSENKO Being Given a Specific Mission or Missions? H. Is There Any Evidence That the Contacts of NOSENKO in 1962 or in 1964 With CIA Were Known to the KGB Prior to His Defection or That NOSENKO Was Ever Briefed by the KGB Relative to His Behavior or KGB Objectives During These Contacts or After His Defection? IV. Comments Concerning Previous Conclusions in Regard to NOSENKO A. NOSENKO Did Not Serve in the Naval RU in Any of the Capacities or at the Places and Times He Claimed B. NOSENKO Did Not Enter the KGB in the Manner or at the Time He Claimed C.' NOSENKO Did Not Scrve in the American Imbassy Scotion Throughout the 1953 - 1955 Period as He Claimed D. During the Period 1955 - 1960, He Was Neither a Senior Case Officer in, nor Deputy Chief of, the Seventh Department American-British Commonwealth Section • E. NOSENKO Was Neither Deputy Chiei of the American Embassy Section nor a Senior Officer or Supervisor in the Section During the Period 1961 - 1962 (sic) I. NOSENKO's Claims, That in 1962 He was Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section and Was Thereafter a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department, Are Not Credible G. NOSENKO Has no Valid Cluim to Certainty That the KGB Recruited No American Embassy Personnel Between 1953 and His Defection in 1964 0001004 2 --- ## Page 5 Annex Annex A - Statements of Soviet Officials About NOSENKO Annex 3 - Summaries of Cases Not Examined in Text Annex C. - The Cherepanov Papers 0001005 SECRET --- ## Page 6 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 7 'SECKLI • INTRODUCIION SECRET GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassilication 0001006 --- ## Page 8 SEGRET INTRODUCTION The following summary and analysis is not intended to be all inclusive, that is to contain a specific comment on all organi- zational, operational, personality and case type information furnished by Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO. To attempt to do so would be repetitious and confusing to the reader and would not be of material benefit in the formation of logical conclusions concerning the rather limited areas of primary concern. This summary will not contain a detailed psychological assessment of NOSENKO nor will it contain a recitation of the numerous theories which have been promulgated in the past concerning varying •-aspects of the NOSENKO case. This summary will be primarily directed toward the question of whether NOSENKO was or was not dispatched by the KGB, whether his claimed KGB career is relatively plausible and whether he has since late October 1967 been cooperative in a reassessment of the entire case for or against NOSENKO. NOSENKO has admitted certain lies and exaggerations in the past but claims that these were of a personal nature, intended to enhance his own importance SECRET 6001007 i rarelin and --- ## Page 9 SECRET but not to mislead this Agency in any material matters of an operational or policy nature. In order to avoid any misunderstanding of the phrase "bona. fides" as considered in this summary, NOSENKO will be judged primarily on whether he voluntarily defected to this Agency without KGB knowledge, and whether his 1962 and early 1964 contacts with representatives of this Agency were known to the KGB. Motivation and certain other pertinent aspects will be considered, but his admitted previous errors, lies and exaggerations will not per se warrant a conclusion that NOSENKO is not a "'bona fide" defector. There is not an accurate standard or scale of measurement *gainst which information concerning NOSENKO can be balanced or correlated to determine if he is or is not a dispatched KGB officer. For purposes of this analysis and summary, an arbitrary list of areas considered pertinent has been compiled. Readers may differ in regard to wheiher this arbitrary standard is a completely accurate standard, but it is felt that the information from NOSENKO and information from other sources derived through independent investigation will permit the reader to assess the information in toto against any standard he considers appropriate. The previous summary on NOSENKO entitled, "The Exami- nation of the Bona Fides of a KGB Defector, " has been considered in SECRET 2 60010C8 --- ## Page 10 SECREI the preparation of this sunmary. I will be commented on in part and this mmmary will include conclusions corselated with the seven primary conclumiona set forth on page 358 of the above summary. Remarks concernlag certais erIors, inconsistencios, omiasions and anupported conclusions in the previous summary in regard to specific canes or sad arens will be included in this summary. However, this summary will not incinde a polas-by-pola: comparison of all areas of agreement or disagroement with inlormation contained la the previous A positive decision in regard to NOSENKO based on all avallable islormation should be made in the immediate futare. There 3Io so known sources currently avallable to provido new positive Information concerning NOSENKO and his bona fides. It la recognized that there la almaya a possibility ln the futare a sew sonrce os sourcos will be able to turniah addicional information in regard to NOSENKO. However, this possibility in exceedingly tenuous and lt la leit there la ruffleient information avallable on which to base a concluston in the NOSENKO matter. 3 0001CCS --- ## Page 11 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 12 II. SECRET SUMMARY OF DEVELOPVENTS IN NOSENKO CASE SINCE 30 OCTOBER 1967 SECRET Ghoup 1 damagrading and declassificatloa 6001010 --- ## Page 13 SECRET SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENTS IN NOSENKO CASE SINCE 30 OCTOBER 1967 Since 30 October 1967, interviews with Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO have been conducted by one individual not previously known personally to NOSENKO but who has been aware of the NOSENKO case since June 1962. Interviews have been detailed and very extensive in scope, have been recorded and transcribed, and have covered the entire life and career of NOSENKO without regard to whether a particular aspect had been covered during previous interview or interviews. NOSENKO, although naturally apprehensive during the first few interviews, has been cooperative, has developed a relaxed attitude, and the interviewer has noted no significant reluctance to discuss any aspect of his life, career, or activities. On occasion NOSENKO has indicated a reluctance to make positive statements in certain areas previously considered at a minimum extremely controversial. This reluctance was understandable and when it became apparent to NOSENKO that the SECRET 6001011 cos rating and --- ## Page 14 SECRE! interviewer would not dispute or disparage his statements without adequate reason; this reluctance on the part of NOSENKO, in the opinion of the interviewer, totally disappeared. During the interviewing period, particularly in the first six months, NOSENKO materially assisted the interviewer by preparing approximately sixty memoranda on such diverse subjects as his life, motivation for de- fection, individual cases, notes which he furnished to CIA in 1964, KGB organization, and KGB officer and agent personalities. As an example of the scope of this work by NOSENKO, four of the memoranda included remarks concerning approximately 875) KGB officers, 100) KGB agents, 35 GRU officers, and 400) other Soviet nationals. These lists were alpha - betically arranged and the above indicated cooperation of NOSENKO has materially assisted in the organization and evaluation of information furnished by him during current interviews. Copies of transcripts of interviews with NOSENKO and related memoranda have been disseminated to the FBI and the CI Staff. Special Agent Elbert Turner and Special Agent James Wooten of the Washington Field Office/FBI in particular have given great assistance in research and compilation of new or additional information and the FBI has inter- viewed or reinterviewed a number of United States citizens concerning whom NOSENKO has furnished pertinent information. 2 E ГЕТ 0001612 --- ## Page 15 SLUALI In addition, three professionale from the SB Division have revlowed the current information and assisted in the retrtoval of previous Information from NOSENKO and collation of current infomaation with prevlous luformatios. The latter la a tremendous taait becauno of the volurse of material; the sumber of Individual cases invoived; and the entenaive infosmation in regard to KGB personlities, procedares, organisational structare and activities. The SB Divialos also provided the services of as expart. translator to frantiate the tapes of the 1965 interrogation of NOSENKO by Pair DERYABIN and one al the previoualy mentioned three pro- fenstonala completed a now translation of the 1962 intessiowa with NOSENKO. In additios, transcriptions of certain other particularly pertinent previous intervlems of NOSENKO have been completed by the Office of Security. Approximately 7000 pugos of transcripts and selated materlal bave been complled and diuseminated mace late Ocsober 1967. Com ments concerning the value of tha Information containod in the above material ase contrined in anothes section of this cummary. As of the present time, & complate analyais is not posmibla since a considerable portion of the material hao not been fully proceased. In the preparation si this summary all areas of major signiflcance have been exarained. Because of the voluminous information, all analysical asd collation work bas not been complaiad; built ia not considered that, based on ail 3 SECRET 6001013 --- ## Page 16 12-0000 SECRET arillable informatios, the remaining work will materially nifect the concisions drawn in this summary. The polygraph Interviem of NOSINKO was initiatod on 2 Angunt and conciuded on 6 Auguat 1968. Approximately sixty gressions of a pertinent nature were included la the polygraph later View. No probleme were encountered during the polygraph luterview and no addittonal testing al NOSENKO le anticipated, Attached la s copy al the melf-explanatory report on the results of the polygraph intervlew. Interviews with NOSENKO lavo continued since the polygraph intosstar on a temporarily reduced acalo in order to permit a revien of previona informatios and preparation ol this summary. There la no doubt thnt future interviews with NOSENKO will reveal information of intulligence value, but information devaloped thus far will permit a decialon la the cass of Yurty Ivanovich NOSENKO. Attachment: 12 Aug 68 Polygraph Rpe 0001014 --- ## Page 17 FROM SUBJECT : Chief, Security Research Staff : Interrogation Research Division Yurly Ivanovich NOSENKO 12 August 1968 IRD # 67491 IDENTIFYING DATA Subject is a 40 year old former KGB Staffer who defected b, to the U.S. in 1964 12 Geneva. BACKGROUND Mr. Bruce I. Solie of the Security Research Staff has been de- brieting and interrogating Subject since October 1967 in order to resolve the issue whether Suoject was a dispatched agent of the KGB. He has conducted & vast amount of research and checking with sources in an effort to establish the veracity of Subject's statements. PURPOSE The primary. purpose of the polygraph test was to determine: I. Whether Subject was a dispatched Agent of the KGB; 2. Whether Subject had Intentionally given Mr. Solie any false Information. PROCEDURE Suoject was given a polygraph examination on 2 August 1968 at & saiesite in the vicinity of Washington, D.C. The examination was conducted in the English language. Subject's comprehension and the ability to express himself in English was completely adequate for purposes of polygraph testing. Subject was completely cooperative in all respects. Subject displayed no evasiveness and appeared to be completely frank whenever he was guestioned or gave information on a topic. The following relevant questions were asked during the first test: Is your true name Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO? Yes. Were you born in the year 1927? Xes. Besides the Americans, did you tell anyone else about your intention to defect? NO. 0001015 SECRET GROW' Excliced drag gularais forecoding aud --- ## Page 18 14-00000 IRO $ 67421 Page 2 Did you ever tell anyone in the KGB about your contact with American Intelligence? No.. Were you given instructions by the KGB to get in contact with American Intelligence? No. Were you told by the KGB to defect in order to carry out an Intelligence mission? No. The following relevant questions were asked during the seconê test: Did the KGB actually send a communication for your recall to the USSR on the day of your defection? No. Were you acquainted with CHEREPANOV? Yes. Did you actually travel to Gorkly In November 1963 to hunt for CHEREPANOV? Yes. 'Are you deliberately withholding from us any information about the KGB recruitment of Americans? No. Does the KGB have METKA and NEPTUNE 80? Yes. Were you the responsible Case Officer for John Abidian in 1960-617 Yes. Do you know the true name of ANDREY Or SASHA? No. Did you ever have tuberculosis? Yes. The following relevant questions were asked on test three: Did you serve in Navy Intelligence from 1951 to 1953% Yes. Was (SHUBIN in the USSR during the period 1957 to 1959? Yes. Io the best of your knowledge, were you in the Seventh Department at this time? Yes. Did you telephone the GRU about SHUBIN at this time? Yes. •To the best of your knowledge, was POPOV compromised because of the letter Mr. Winters mailed? Yes. 0001016 --- ## Page 19 a. and IRI Pager 67431 To the best of your knowledge, was PINKOVSKTY exposed to the KGB because of the mass surveillance on the British Embassy? Yes. Was there any misleading Information in the notes you-brought out from the Soviet Union? No. Did you intentionally exaggerate your personal association with GRIBANOV? NO. Are you hiding any adverse information about your background? No. Subject's polygraph test reflected no significant responses indicative eception regarding the relevant questions asked. No further polygraph s were administered on this date because the examiner did not want to ine risk of fatigue setting in and thus possibly causing adrenalin. Polygraph testing was resumed on 6 August 1968. The following ant questions were asked on test fowr: ou Join the KGB in March 1953? Yes. are you a KGB officer from 1953 to 1964? Yes. re you a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department? Yes. re you only a Captain at this time? Yes. re you an officer in the U.S. Embassy Section from March 3 to May 1955% Yes. 1958 and 1959 were you the Deputy Chief of the American- tish-Canadian Section in the Seventh Department? Yes. January 1960 to December 1961 vere you the Deputy to the of the First Section of the First Department? Yes. January to July 1962 were you the Chief of the Flrst Section e Seventh Department? Yes. you an officer in the First Section, First Department, _SCD, • time of the Stalingrad operation against Benson, Mule and ?. Yes. 0001015 --- ## Page 20 IRD # 67491 Page 4 The following relevant questions were asked on test five: Since 1953 do you know of any other KGB recruitments in the American Embassy besides ANDREY and HOWARD? No. Did the KGB know about the notes you brought out? No. Have you told us the complete truth about your kGB career? Yes. Did you intentionally exaggerate your personal involvement in cases in 1962 and 1964 in order to mislead us? No. Did you Intentionally give us any false operational. information? No. Did GRIBANOV offer you the position of Deputy Chief of the First Department? Xes. Was an order actually prepared promoting you to deputy to the Chief of the First Department? Yes. In early 1960 dia GRIBANOV tell you that your primary responsibility was to work against American Code Clerks? Yes. Other than you mentioned, are you hiding any other reasons for your defection? No. Are you deliberately withholding any information on any foreigners recruited by the KGB? No. The following relevant questions were asked on test six: Did you enter the KGB through the influence of General BOGDANN KOBULOV? Yes. Did you succeed BAKHVALOV as Deputy Chief of the First Section? Yes. Did GRYAZNOV succeed you as Deputy Chief of the First Section? Yes. Were the CHERTPANOV papers passed to the Americans with KGB knowledge? No. 0001018 --- ## Page 21 SLCRET IRD # 67421 Page. 5 To your knowledge was there any misleading infomation in the CHEREPANOV papers? No. Did you ever personally meet GOLITSYN? No. Was there a cable sent to Geneva for you to assist ARTFMEV In the BELITSKIY CaSe? Yes. Did you personally make an approach to KEYSERS at the Moscow Airport? Yes. The following relevant questions were asked on test seven:! Did you actually review the KGB file on OSWALD? Yes. Did LEE HARVEY OSWALD reCeive any KGB training or assigments? No. Were there any microphones installed in the North Wing of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow? Was the review of microphone reports one of your duties in 1960-617 Yes. Are you withholding any Information known to you concering KGB microphones or electronic activity against the U.S. Embassy? NO. Before your official transfer to the Seventh Department did you read the surveillance report on the visit of ABIDIAN to PUSHKIN street? Yes. Did you personally conduct a certain investigation of SHAKOV in 1962 In Geneva? Yes. Was the rank of Lieutenant Colonel on your travel document i to GORIIY only a mistake by KASHPEROV? Yes. The following relevant questions were asked on test eight: While in the U.S. Embassy Section did you obtain a typewriter for BORODIN for the preparation of a letter to Edward Ellis SMITH? Yes. 0001019 --- ## Page 22 IRD t/ 67491 Page Did you read the official repori of KOSOLArOV on his contact with JENNER on a train from llelsinii to Moscow? Yes. Are you intentionally withholding any infornation concerning KGB knowledge of CIA personnel in Moscow? No. Is there any possibility that the iCE would aispatch an officer to defect to the Americans? No. Subject's polygraph test of 6 August Likewise reflated no indications of deception. CONCLUSION Based solely on the overall analysis of Subjeci's polygraph tests, It is the opinion of the undersigned that the Subject has been substantially truthul in answering the relevant questions. asked. 6001020 Censeeine and --- ## Page 23 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 24 SECRET III. ANALYTICAL COMMENTS CONCERNING THE BONA FIDES OF YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO SECRET 89000 1 Excluded tron adiematic tomagrading a:2 declassification 6001021 --- ## Page 25 SECRET ANALYTICAL COMMENTS CONCERNING THE BONA FIDES OF YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO As indicated in the introduction to this summary, information in regard to Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO will be considered against an arbi- trary but realistic list of areas considered pertinent to the question of whether NOSENKO voluntarily defected to this Agency without KGB knowledge, and whether his 1962 and early 1964 contacts with represent- atives of this Agency were known to the KGB: It was noted that motivation and certain other pertinent aspects would also be considered but that his admitted previous lies and exag- gerations would not per se warrant a conclusion that NOSENKO is not a "bona fide defector." The following is a list of the areas considered pertinent and which are being given specific consideration. Attached is a separate section containing remarks in regard to the designated areas of A - H. A. Is NOSENKO identical to the person whom he claims to be? B. Is the claimed KGB career of NOSENKO plausible? SECRET GROUP 1 Excluded trem automatic downgrading and declassification 0001022 --- ## Page 26 C. Has NOSENKO given an acceptable explanation of his motivation in contacting CIA in 1962 and for his defection in 1964? D. Is the information furnished by NOSENKO to CIA concerning KGB operations, personalities, and organi- zation reasonably commensurate with his claimed KGB career? E.: Can the information furnished by NOSENKO be con- sidered in toto as having resulted in material damage to the KGB and/or has the information furnished by NOSENKO been of significant benefit to Western Intelli- gence? F. Is there evidence of KGB deception or "give away" in information furnished by NOSENKO which would warrant a conclusion that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB? G. Is there evidence of a political or any other type objective which could justify a dispatch of NOSENKO by the KGB with permission to speak freely to CIA concerning his knowledge of the KGB and without NOSENKO being given a specific mission or missions? 0001023 SECRET --- ## Page 27 14-00000 SECRET H. Is there any evidence that the contacts of NOSENKO in 1962 or in 1964 with CIA were known to the KGB prior to his defection or that NOSENKO was ever briefed by the KGB relative to his behavior or KGB objectives during these contacts or after his defection? 6001024 SECRET --- ## Page 28 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 29 14-00000 SECRET A. IS NOSENKO IDENTICAL IO THE PERSON WHOM HE CLAIMS TO BE? 0R027 1 SECRE Excludeo from aromatie donagrading ard declassification 0001025 --- ## Page 30 SECREI A. Is NOSENKO identical to the person whom he claims to be? During interviews NOSENKO has furnished detailed information in regard to his family, his activities as a youth, the schools he attended, assoc- iates of his father and mother, and his own associates. The period under consideration in this section is the period preceding his entry into the First Department, Second Chief Directorate, MVD, in mid- March 1953. Information furnished by NOSENKO concerning his father and mother and his early life, together with other information such as a comparison of photographs of NOSENKO and a photograph of his father and confirmed travel of his mother to Western Europe in 1956 with Madame KOSYGINA, conclusively establish that he is Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO, the son of Ivan Isidorovich NOSENKO, the Minister of Ship- building in the USSR prior to his death in 1956. This is also satisfactorily supported by personal-type information furnished by NOSENKO concern- ing other associates of his father and mother. Since, as indicated above, there is considered to be no doubt that Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO is the son of the former Minister of Shipbuilding, a detailed study of his life prior to 1945 (age 18) is of SECRET 000102S GROUP 1 Excluded from aulemalles doragracing nud --- ## Page 31 SECRET little or no value in assessing the bona fides or non-bona fides of NOSENKO. An expose of his youthful indiscretions, of which he has admitted a number, is of no import in a discussion of whether NOSENKO was or was not dispatched by the KGB. Obtaining any collateral first- hand information in regard to NOSENKO before 1945 would be of negligible value, but there actually is supporting information from Nikolay ARTAMONOV, a defector from the Soviet Navy, concerning the claimed attendance by NOSENKO at a military-naval preparatory school in Leningrad. NOSENKO, during current interviews, has stated that he grad- uated from the Institute of International Relations in 1950 and had attended the Institute since 1945. He has explained that he should have graduated in 1949 since it was a four-year course, but failed the final examination in Marxism and therefore was required to attend the Institute for a longer period of time and again take his final examinations. Based on information furnished by NOSENKO concerning co- students and the Institute, there is no reason to doubt that he actually attended and graduated from the Institute of International Relations in 1950. The previous controversy in this matter was complicated by NOSENKO who, in 1964 after his defection, stated in a biography that he had graduated from the Institute in 1949. Actually this statement 0001027 2 SECRET --- ## Page 32 SECRET by NOSENKO in 1964 resulted in conflicting information since NOSENKO on 9 June 1962 during his first contact with CIA had stated that he "completed the Institute of International Relations in 1950." NOSENKO has given the explanation that he changed the date of his graduation to 1949 because he did not wish to admit that he had failed to graduate in 1949: NOSENKO explained that this change in his date of graduation caused him to pre-date his actual entry into Navy Intelligence to 1950 instead of 1951 and his actual entry into the KGB from 1953 to 1952. The above action by NOSENKO is included in what NOSENKO has characterized as his "stupid blunders." The latter is a rather apt characterization of his now admitted lies and exaggerations but is not evidence that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB. It is evidence of a certain personality trait of NOSENKO who has in the past by his own admission tended to enhance his importance and astuteness by graphically portraying his personal participation in KGB activities concerning which he had knowledge but did not personally participate. The claimed service of NOSENKO in Navy Intelligence during March 1951 to early 1953 in the Far East and the Baltic areas has been seriously questioned in the past. Specific comments on this period of 3 SECRET 6001028 --- ## Page 33 ! time are contained in a separate section of this summary, but it is considered that the recent interviews of NOSENKO satisfactorily sub- stantiate his claimed service in Navy Intelligence during March 1951 to early 1953. Attached is a typed copy of a handwritten memorandum completed by NOSENKO on 31. October 1967. This is a biographical statement con- cerning his life and KGB career. No effort has been made to correct grammatical errors or spelling since to do so would be in conflict with the manner in which current interviews were conducted; namely, to give NOSENKO an opportunity to recount his life and activities to permit a re- examination of the entire case. The comprehension and fluency of NOSENKO in the English language was adequate for interview purposes in October 1967 and both have materially improved since that time. Interviews of and memoranda prepared by NOSENKO since 31 October 1967 have not indicated any material discrepancies with the statements of NOSENKO in the attached memorandum. One change that has been made by NOSENKO is that he now dates his transfer from the First Department, Second Chief Directorate (SCD), KGB, to the Seventh Department, SCD, as occurring in the latter part of May 1955 rather than June - July 1955 as indicated in the attached statement. NOSENKO also now dates the period in which an unsatisfactory "characterization" 0001029 SECRET --- ## Page 34 (personnel evaluation) was prepared on NOSENKO in March - April 1955 rather than May - June 1955. Since the unsatisfactory personnel report was directly related to his transfer to the Seventh Department, neither of the above changes are considered to be of a significant nature. An effort has been made during current interviews to differentiate between errors due to faulty memory and discrepancies indicative of deception by NOSENKO. Attachment: 31 Oct 67 Memo 5 SECRET 0001030 --- ## Page 35 SEChEl Operational Memo # N-2 SUBJECT: NOSENKO, Yuri Ivanovich . The following is a typed copy of a handwritten memorandum furnished by Subject on 31 October 1967, following a request on 30 October 1967: I, NOSENKO, George, was born 30 October 1927 in the city Nicolaev, Ukraine. My family: the father - NOSENKO, Ivan, b. 1902, was working at the shipbuilding plant and studied at the shipbuilding institute, which he finished in 1928; the mother - NOSENKO, Tamara (nee MARKOVSKI), b. 1908, a housewife; the brother - NOSENKO, Vladimir; b. 1944, a student. In September 1934 I began to study in the school (0 class) but studied a short period of time because in October with the mother went in Leningrad where the father was working at the shipbuilding plant, "Sudamech" from summer 1934. In Nicolaev I was living at the Street Nicolski 7. All relatives of my family were living also in Nicolaev. In Leningrad I was living with parents in three places till 1938: at the Street Stachek (1934 - summer 1935), St. Canal of Griboedov, 154 (1935-1938), St. M. Gorky (short period in 1938). From 1935 till SECRET 0001031 GROUP T Excluled from automalie --- ## Page 36 1938 I studied at the schools, which were close to my places of living. In 1938 the father began to work in Moscow and soon I with the mother went to live in Moscow in the end of this year. In Moscow we were living at the St. Serafimovich, 2. Here I was continuing to study at the school 585 (St. B. Polianka). In 1941 I finished 6th class and went with parents to rest to the south (Sochi) but soon began the war and we returned in Moscow. In October 1941 I with my mother went in the evacuation in Cheliabinsk (Ural), where I finished 7th class in spring 1942. In Cheliabinsk I lived in the poselok ChIZ, being there I tried to run to the front with my playfellow BUSKO, but we were caught and returned home. In 1942 (summer) I went with the mother in city Gorki and in July- August we returned in Moscow. In August I entered in the Moscowite military-navy special school, which was evacuated in Kuibyshev, where I finished 8th class in summer 1943 and after that I arrived on a leave in Moscow. Thie • school must be evacuated from Kuibyshev in Achinsk (Siberia) and I did not want to go there. With the help of father I was accepted in the Baku's military-navy preparatory school and in August went in Baku, where I was studying at the second course (9th class). In this school I twice tried to be sent as a volunteer to the front but failed. Soon d1.0= 2 SECRET 0001032 --- ## Page 37 after that I run with a friend (RADCHENKO) home in Moscow (January 1944). : In Moscow I studied at the courses (Russian word), finished 9th class and was accepted again in the military-navy preparatory school, which was located in Leningrad. In August of 1944 I went in Leningrad. All cadets of this school were sent to forest (about 200 km. from Leningrad) to prepare wood for winter, where we have been two monthe. In November I wounded by chance the left hand and was put in the navy hospital. When I was in the hospital I decided not to return in the school but to finish 10th class in Leningrad about what I have written a letter to my father asking his help and agreement with such my decision. With the help of the father's friends I quited with the school and entered in the shipbuilding college on the second course in January 1945 and studied there till the end of May. The WWIl finished and I decided to return to Moscow. The director of the shipbuilding college had given me a document that I studied in this college at the second course and finished this course (though I was not passing exams). In Leningrad I was living in the hostel of this college (St. Tolmachev). . In May 1945 I arrived in Moscow and was living with parente (St. Granovaki, 3). 3 0001033 SECRET --- ## Page 38 ocunci In summer 1945 there was created the institute of the inter. national relations in Moscow and in July I entered in this institute. In July my father went in Germany with the group of engineers and he took me (I received a temporary rank of a senior lieutenant, documents and a uniform). In 1945-1950 I studied at the institute. In 1946 I acquainted! / with a girl - Shishkov FLAVIA, student of the medicine institute. I was in close relatione with this girl, because of the pregnancy I married her and she made an abort. My parents were against the marriage and we did not live together and we soon divorced. In the end of 1946 I was acquai nted with Telegin AUGUSTINE and was going to marry her, re ceived a flat in 1947 (St. Mira - former Ist Uecyehckad, 162/174). In November her father, General TELEGIN, was arrested, but I married " her. The marriage was not successful. I foundout about her close relations with the brother, and the child-girl was born with pathological changes. I was not the father of this child. After that I broke with her and we were living separately (end of 1948 - beginning 1949). In spring 1950 before state exams in the institute was working the commission, which was deal ing with future works of the students of my 5th course. I expressed a wish to work in any military organization 0001034 --- ## Page 39 and soon I was invited to visit personnel department of MGB (Ministry of State Security). But MGB did not accept me. After that with the help of the father I began to deal with the personnel department of the intelligence of the ministry of military navy concerning my future work. Passing state exams I failed Marxism-Leninism and with a group of fails I was passing state exams once more. In October 1950 I finished the institute and received a diploma. I was accepted in the navy intelligence in the 13 of March 1951 and in March 17 went by a train to Soviet Harbour (intelligence of 7th Fleet, as an interpreter of the information department). Before going: to the Far East I began my divorce with the former wife. At the end of April 1952 I went on a leave in Moscow. Immediately after returning in Moscow I had a blood cough out. In the middle of May I went to a tuberculous sanatorium not far from Moscow. In July I finished my treatment and returned in Moscow. Because of the health I could not return back to the Far East and the personnel department of the navy intelligence sent me to Baltic Sea (as a senior interpreter of the navy intelligence point of the intelligence of 4th Fleet - in Sovietsk, Kaliningrad's dietrict). When I studied at the institute I as all the students received a rank of junior lieutenant of administrative service after finishing the 0001035 5 SECRET --- ## Page 40 second course in 1947. In 1951 the ministry of navy had given me also the rank of junior lieutenant when I was accepted in the navy intelligence. In September-October 1952 I received a rank of lieutenant. In Sovietsk the work was not interested and for me it was nothing . to doi Besides this the climate was not good for my health and I decided to change the job. With thie purpose before new year at the end of 1952 I took a leave and went to Moscow. January 1 I was with my parents at the evening party at the cottage of General MGB KOBULOV, whom I did not know before, but I knew his son-in-law Vahrushev Vasili - a former student and my friend. I told him about my job and that now I was thinking about change of the job. KOBULOV was speaking with me on this theme and propose we work and his help in MGB, but nothing more definite was said about my work. This month I reported to the head of the personnel department of the navy intelligence KALOSHIN about my decision and that I will be working in MGB. In the end of January I went again in the tuberculous sanatorium, where I was in 1952. In the days of funeral of STALIN I has come to Moscow and visited the ministry where my father was working. There I have seen General KOBULOV who has come to the father and he said that he would settle my question concerning my job. After several days in the middle of March I have received a telephone call from MVD to 0001036 6 SECRET --- ## Page 41 SECREA come to KOBULOV. There I have spent about two hours in the re- ception room of KOBULOV, but he was too busy and his assistant SAVITSKI sent me to the Deputy of the Chief of the Second Directory SHUBNIAKOV, who told me that there was signed an order and I was accepted in the 1 department of 2 chief directory as a case officer. SHUBNIAKOV invited the deputy of the chief of l department GORBATENKO (who was acting as the chief of 1 Department because the chief of the department KOSLOV, Anatoli, was appointed to the special department of extraordinarily affairs (investigation) ). SHUBNIAKOV and GORBATENKO said to me that I would be working in the l section of the department. Then I with GORBATENKO went to the 1 department, was acquainted with the chief of section KOSLOV, Veniamin. KOSLOV told me that I will be working against the American correspondents, showed me room, my desk and acquainted with the officers, who were working in this room: KUTIREV, RACOVSKI, GROMOV and TURMOSOY. The last officer must give files on the correspondents and agents. I was said to come next day and began to work. When I was resting in the tuberculous sanatoriim I acquainted with KOJEVNIKOV, Ludmila, a student of the Moscowite University, and in June 1953 we married. Before it I was living with my parents at St. Gorky, 9, but after marriage was living with the wife at 6001057 --- ## Page 42 St. Serafimovich, 2 (the flat of her parents). In 1955 I received a flat. at St. Narodnya, 13, where was living with my family. In 1954 I contracted a disease (gonorrhea) and on the advice of the friend IVANOV went to medic point at St. Negliunya. Doctors asked to show a document,. I had with me only MVD certificate and an: operative passport and showed them the passport.. Doctors had given me a treatment, after that twice they made tests and asked to come once more, but I did not come. They wanted to see once more and sént a letter to the place of work, which was written in the passport. The plant with MVD found out about it.. The deputy of the chief, SHUBNIAKOV, was speaking with me. I had written my explanation, and punished by the chief of the 2 directory, FEDOTOV - 15 days of arrest. The komsomol's organization also punished me. I received a strict reprimand and was ' freed of the head of komsomol's organization of the 2 chief director. I was a member of komsomol's organizationfrom, October 1943. In the end of 1954 before leaving komsomol (because of age) the komsomol organization of KGB took off this strict reprimand. In 1955 on all officers of the 2 chief directory were written characterizations (May-June). In my characterization was written that I did not appropriate to the 1 department 2 chief directory. In June. July I was appointed to the 7 départment 2 chief directory as a case 0001038 8 --- ## Page 43 14-00000 officer of 2 section. This section was new created (the work against tourists). The chief of 7 department - PERFILIEV, the chief of the 2 section - GUSKOV. In 1956 I was accepted as a candidate in the Communist Party, soon received a rank of a senior lieutenant and got a promotion a senior case officer. In 1957 I was accepted in the Party as a member. In August 1956 my father died. In 1957 or 1958 I was promoted a deputy chief of 2 section. In 7th department I was working till 1960 and in January 1960 was sent to work as a deputy chief of the l section in the 1 department 2 chief directory (chief of the 1 department, KLIPIN, Vlad., chief of the 1 section - KOVSHUK). My family was consist of the wife and two daughters: Oksana, born in 1954, and Tamara, born in 1958. Oksana was ill (bronchial asthma) from 1957 and almost every year till 1963 2-3 monthe was in hospitals: In 1960 I'was thinking about change (temporary) place of living and there was a possibility to go to work in 2 departments KGB in Lvov and Odessa. But there was another question if I go from Moscow I would lose the flat in Moscow. At this time the chief of the section of 2 department, PIATROVSKI, proposed to me to go to work in Ethiopia 0001639 9 SECRET --- ## Page 44 SECRET. (counter-intelligence work among Soviet specialists in Ethiopia). The chief of 2 chief directory agreed and the question was almost decided •but in the last moment the personnel department of KGB did not agree. The reasons were the case of 1954 (illness and use of the passport for "cover) and a checking in the place of my living (some of agente report that drink and on this base have quarrels with the wife). I was working in the 1 department till 1962. In January 1962 I was appointed again it-the 7 department as the chief of the 1 section (work against tourista from the USA and Canada). In December 1959 I got a rank of a captain. When I began to work in the 7 department I knew that soon I must be promoted a deputy chief of the department, when would free a place - the deputy chief of department BALDIN was preparing to go to work in eastern Germany. In July 1962 I was appointed the deputy chief of 7 department (the chief of the department was CHELNOKOV) and here I was working till January 18, 1964. During my work in MVD-KGB I did not study in any school, only in 1953-1954 was visiting courses of foreign languages of MVD- KGB at St, Kiselni. 10 6001040 SECRET --- ## Page 45 SECRET Five times I was sent abroad: In 1957 I was in England with a sport delegation; in 1958 was again in England with a sport delegation; in 1960 I was in Cuba with a delegation of specialists of nickel industry; in 1961 I was sent in Bulgaria with the aim to help to 1 department 2 directory MVD; in 1962 I was in Switzerland - the conference of dis - armament. Working in MVD-KGB every year I had leaves for rest. In 1953 with the wife I was resting in the tuberculous sanatorium. In 1954 I was with the family at the cottage. In 1955 I was resting at the cottage. In March 1956 I was resting with the wife in Karlovi Vary, Czechoslovakia In 1957 I was in Leningrad two weeke with the wife and then rested at the cottage. In 1958 I was resting at the cottage. In 1959 I with the wife rested in Sochi, In January-February 1960 I rested with the wife in Kislovodsk. In 1961 - August - I rested with the wife and daughters in Nicolaev. In October 1962 I rested with the wife in Sochi. In July 1963 I rested with the wife and daughters in Anapa. C001041 11 --- ## Page 46 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 47 SECRET B. iS THE CLAIMED KGB CAREER OF NOSENKO PLAUSIBLE? SECRET Elust ton automatic) dowagradiar and declassification 0001042 --- ## Page 48 B. Is the claimed KGB career of NOSENKO plausible? In the past the theory has been advanced that NOSENKO was never an officer in the KGB. Information of a detailed nature from NOSENKO concern- ing the KGB, particularly the Second Chief Directorate, has been 80 extensive as to invalidate any contention that he was not a KGB officer. It is considered that NOSENKO was a KGB officer in the claimed Departments during the claimed periods of time and served in the claimed positions in each Department. It is interesting to note that NOSENKO has not materially varied in his statements in regard to the above since his original contact in June 1962 (with the exception of his change to 1952 as date of his entry into the KGB and then later reverting to the date given in 1962). There have been some variations in dates of a minor nature, as indicated elsewhere in this summary, but these are of month or day . of transfer from one Department to another and not considered critical or evidence of deception. NOSENKO has admitted previously giving false information in regard to rank and medals, but his basic story concerning SECRET GROUP 1 Congrating att 0001043 --- ## Page 49 his KGB career today is not significantly different from the fragmentary version he gave in June 1962. Basically the following is now considered to have been the KGB career of NOSENKO: Mid-Marck 1953 - late May 1955, First Section, First Department, SCD Late May 1955 - December 1959 (1958 - December 1959 - Deputy Chief of Section) Seventh Department, SCD January 1960 - December 1961, Deputy Chief of Section, First Section, First Department, SCD January 1962 - July 1962, Chief of First Section, Seventh Department, SCD July 1962 - January 1964, Deputy Chief of Seventh Department, SCD (NOTE: The term Deputy Chief is being used throughout this summary, but the better terminology probably is "Deputy to Chief." The position of "Deputy Chief" in United States Government parlance, including CIA, is not synonymous with the term "Deputy Chief" as used 0001044 SECRET --- ## Page 50 in Soviet organizations and more specifically in the KGB. As an example, a Chief of Department in the KGB or the Chief of a Residentura abroad may have 2, 3 or even 4 deputies, one of whom is given the title of First Deputy. This particular deputy acts in the absence of the Chief of Department and in general has supervisory functions over all the Department sections. The exception to the latter is when the Chief of Department retains direct supervision over what he may consider the most important section. Other deputies have supervisory functions only over designated sections or organizational components.) During current interviews and in prepared memoranda, NOSENKO has furnished detailed information which it is considered substantiates his claimed positions in the KGB. Detailed remarks on these topics are contained in separate sections of this summary. It is realized that GOLITSYN, although confirming that NOSENKO was a KGB officer in both the First Department and Seventh Department, SCD, has stated that NOSENKO remained in the First Department until circa 1958 and that NOSENKO was not Deputy Chief of the First Section, First Department, in 1960. It is impossible to correlate this information with the above indicated opinion that NOSENKO left the First Department in late May 1955 and was Deputy Chief of the First Section, First Depart- ment, in 1960, nor is an adequate explanation of these variances available 0001C45 3 SECRET --- ## Page 51 SECRET at this time. On the other hand, it is not reasonable that NOSENKO would lay claim to the title of Deputy Chief of the First Section, First Department, if this were not true when he clearly knew of the visits of GOLITSYN to the First Section in 1960 - 1961 and of his conferences with officers closely associated with NOSENKO at that time. NOSENKO has also mentioned a number of officers of the SCD or former officers of the SCD who transferred to the FCD with whom he was personally acquainted and who were also known to GOLITSYN. A number of these officers were officers from whom GOLITSYN has stated he obtained certain information or through whom he became aware of certain activities including Vladislav M. KOVSHUK, Gennadiy I. GRYAZNOV, Vladimir Ivanovich PETROV, Yuriy I. GUK, Vladimir A. CHURANOV, Yevgeniy GROMAKOVSKIY and Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV. The statement of NOSENKO that although he had heard of GOLITSYN he had never personally met GOLITSYN, stands in conflict with the statements of GOLITSYN that he, GOLITSYN, had met and talked with NOSENKO in the SCD in the late 1950's. The description of GOLITSYN of this meeting is that of a casual encounter in the halls rather than a specific office visit. In light of this, the absence of any reason why NOSENKO from his point of view should remember such an encounter and the absence of any reason for NOSENKO to lie on this 0001046 SECRET --- ## Page 52 Scuncl issue, it is eminently reasonable to conclude that the encounter took piace but that NOSENKO simply has no recollection of it. There is no reason to attach significance to this lapse of memory. The previous opinion that NOSENKO did not hold the claimed position of Deputy Chief, First Section, First Department, during 1960 1961 has had the most merit in the controversy over his statements relative to his KGB career. This particular aspect will be covered in detail in another section, but of note at this time is the controversy over what duties the position of Deputy Chief of Section in the SCD, KGB, entails or does not entail. It is a fruitless exercise to attempt to judge whether NOSENKO was Deputy Chief of the First Section in 1960 - 1961 on the basis of whether his knowledge of the total activities of the First Section was commensurate with the knowledge of a Deputy Branch Chief in CIA in regard to the activities of the entire Branch. Whether NOSENKO was a Deputy Chief of Section in the SCD, KGB, must be judged on the basis of what were the duties of a Deputy Chief of Section in the SCD and in particular what were his duties in the particular assignment. The organizational structure of the KGB may or may not have some similarities to the organizational structure of CIA, but any similarities are surely not such as to permit a judgment 5 SECRET 0001047 --- ## Page 53 SECRET as to whether NOSENKO held a certain claimed position on the basis of a comparison of his activities and responsibilities with that inherent in a somewhat similar position in CIA. One of the most important differences between United States agencies or organizations, including CIA, and the bureaucratic structure of agencies of organizations in the USSR, including the KGB, is the salary structure. Pay of a KGB officer is based on military rank and on actual position held with an additional percentage increase for longevity and language qualification. Actual position held is important from a monetary viewpoint in addition to the prestige. As an example, the difference in monthly salary between a captain and a major is twenty rubles and the difference in salary between a Senior Case Officer and a Deputy Chief of Section is also twenty rubles. An increase in military rank alone has limited pay advantages, as for example a Lieutenant Colonel who is only a Senior Case Officer receives less pay than a major who holds the position of Chief of Section. During current interviews, an effort has been made to obtain from NOSENKO statements concerning his responsibilities in the various claimed positions. The judgment on whether he held or did not hold the various claimed positions, in view of the absence of any factual 6 6001(48 --- ## Page 54 supporting or refuting information, has necessarily been based to a considerable degree on the logic of the statements made by NOSENKO. Admittedly this is not the most satisfactory way of resolving the questions, but it is the only method possible at this time. 0001049 7 SECRET --- ## Page 55 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 56 SECRET C. HAS NOSENKO GIVEN AN ACCEPTABLE EXPLANATION OF HIS MOTIVATION IN CONTACTING CIA IN 1962 AND FOR HIS DEFECTION IN 1964? SECRET GROUP 1 Excladed iron automatle coungrading aud declassification 6001050 --- ## Page 57 SECRET C. Has NOSENKO given an acceptable explanation of his motivation in contacting CIA in 1962 and for his defection in 1964? Of the eight listed categories which are being given specific consideration in the matter of the bona fides of NOSENKO, this category is probably the most difficult in which to present a logical position with factual support. There are too many intangible aspects involved and although motivation is an important factor; full resolution of the motivation problem is not a paramount factor in deciding whether NOSENKO is or is not a dispatched agent. . NOSENKO could have contacted this Agency in 1962 and defected in 1964 without KGB knowledge and yet even at this late date have failed to disclose some important events of a personal nature. which actually were important ingredients in his ultimate decision. Defectors are humans and have at least the normal reluctance to admit unfavorable information which they consider of a personal nature. On 31 October 1967 NOSENKO, following a request, furnished a handwritten memorandum on the topic of his motivation, a typed copy of which is attached. The memorandum, although not grammatically correct, is quite understandable and is worthy of review. The tenor of the memo- randum is one of increasing disillusionment with the Soviet regime. SECRET 6001051 --- ## Page 58 SECRET NOSENKO and others of his generation have lived in a Soviet society throughout their entire lives. The environment is an important factor of influence in the life of an individual and true disillusionment is at best usually a gradual process in which many factors, some recognized and some not recognized by the individual, have played a role in varying degrees. NOSENKO, until 1955 and possibly until the death of his father in August 1956, could be compared to the profligate son of wealthy parents in the United States who finally graduates from college and obtains employment perhaps in the firm of his father without actually earning any of the luxuries he has enjoyed. The father of NOSENKO was not only wealthy by Soviet standards but also held a high government position. The influence of his father and the name of his father undoubtedly was an important if not the most important factor in NOSENKO even being permitted to enter the Naval RU and the KGB even though NOSENKO is particularly reluctant to admit, perhaps even to himself, that this was the primary reason. The above should not be construed as any reflection on the actual intelligence of NOSENKO, but rather as an explanation of how NOSENKO could have even entered the Naval RU and KGB. His 2 SECRFT 0001652 --- ## Page 59 SECRET performance in both prior to 1956 by his own admission was such that he probably would have been summarily terminated if he had not been the son of the capable, respected Minister of Shipbuilding. If a certain amount of speculation is permitted, the disillusionment of NOSENKO, who lost many personal advantages following the death of his father including a personal automobile, may have actually started soon after the death of his father. That NOSENKO is undisciplined is supported by his admissions relative to his life in the USSR and his behavior both in 1962 in Geneva and for a period of time after his defection in 1964. NOSENKO was addicted to women, liquor, and the material things which can be purchased with money or obtained through influence. A question has been previously raised regarding his motivation in contacting CIA in 1962, particularly his statement that he needed money and would sell "two pieces of information." NOSENKO has stated that he wanted to make a contact with the Americans, that he was not emotionally ready to defect, but that he subconsciously believed that if he made a contact he would be making an ultimate commitment from which he could no longer retreat. 3 0001053 SECRET --- ## Page 60 14-00000 NOSENKO has stated that he gave considerable thought to the best way to contact the Americans so that he would be believed and not rejected and came to the conclusion that he would offer to sell some information. NOSENKO stated that he thought if he approached the Americans stating he was a "KGB counterintelligence officer who wanted to give information," he would not have been believed and would have been peremptorily rejected. NOSENKO stated he had difficulty deciding. how much money to ask for and how to make the approach, but finally decided to do it through David MARK)whom the KGB considered was with American Intelligence. The above statements by NOSENKO are not in conflict with the record. NOSENKO did offer to sell "two pieces of information," almost immediately gave more information, made no significant demands for money, and in fact his price for "two pieces of information" was ridiculously low by American standards. NOSENKO has during current interviews stated, as he first stated in 1962, that he had spent excessive amounts of money in one or two riotous evenings. However, NOSENKO has during current interviews stated that he could have covered his expenditures by other means without receiving any money from the Americans. 4 6001054 --- ## Page 61 NOSENKO has stated that the sight before his departure from Ganeva to the USSR he gave serious thougài to defection but was not emotionnily ndmpted to delect at that time. Following bia saturn to the Sortel Valon, NOSENKO, during a period of time, made his final decision to defect at the firet opportunity, realising that it reant leaving his wie, childres, and otber members of his family la the Some aspects of the motivation of NOSENKO are obacure and will probably so remain. Il moald be proferable li an exuet detuliod chronology of all the lactore involvod could be prepared or 11 ever certain obvious factors could be accurately delinented. These ars both Imponsible at this time and probably at say time in the future. What in Important at this timo lo a decimion an to whether the motivation ol NOSENKO wan baond on personal ressons with no implications of KCB dispatch. It la considered that the explasazion of NOSKNKO concerning bin motivation 1s acceptable and thai hin tatement that no one escept the Americans was aware of his contacts with the Americane in 1962 Of bis istoni to defaci in 1964 1a supported by otbes Information of a collateral astaro. (See Secton Ill, H.) Attachment: Typed cpy Memo from NOSENKO 5 GECRET 6001055 --- ## Page 62 Operational Memo # N-4 SUBJECT: NOSENKO, Yuri Ivanovich The following is a typed copy of a handwritten memorandum furnished by Subject on 1 November 1967, following a request on 31 October 1967: What were the motif and the reasons which have led me to the decision to breake with the Soviet Russia? The only definite is an understanding of the situation in the Soviet Russia, the knowledge of the methods of the communist regime, the knowledge of the real foreign and interior policies of the Soviet government and the faith in the right neis of the free world. It was not a decision which was accepted or could be accepted in a month or a year. This decision was slowly growing in me. I' think that the beginning was in the studentship. Living with my parents and being in the circles of the parent's and my acquaintances I knew more then there was written in newspapers and periodice and that was propagandized by radio and TV. Working in the Far East and later being in trips in different regione and cities of Russia I found out much better the life and conditions of the life of the people of the Soviet Russia. SECRET GRoUP 1 Facinder frens aulemalle? 6001056 --- ## Page 63 When I worked 11 years in MVD-KGB I understood and found out very many things, details and the real deal of the existing regime, about methods of the work of MGB-MVD-KGB and about their doings, about hundreds of thousands of the people of Russia who were (and still are) considered "politically'' dangerous and around whom was (and atill is) going an active work of all organs KGB. At the same time when I was several times abroad I have seen personally the so-called "decay" at the West. I have seen in reality how is living people. Several times when I was abroad I was thinking about staying at the West and not returning in Russia, but only one thing was keeping me - my family. In 1962 in Switzerland I made the acquaintance with the Americans. From my part "the sell of the information" was a real show. I was thinking that they would not believe me otherwise. In that period of the time there was going a big struggle in me to stay abroad or to return home till the last days of living in Geneva and even when I was returning home in Vienna. In 1962-1963 I decided definitely that I did not want and could not live more in the Soviet Russia. In this period of time I have done all my best to go as soon as possible abroad. 2 0001657 --- ## Page 64 14-00000 VIVIL It was not easy to make this decision, it was very difficult to leave the family for ever.. And now in spite of everything I do not regret. 0001058 3 SFPPET --- ## Page 65 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 66 SECRET D. IS THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY NOSENKO TO CIA CONCERNING KGB OPERATIONS, PERSONALITIES, AND ORGANIZATION REASONABLY COMMENSURATE WITH HIS CLAIMED KGB CAREER? SECRET Excludes. Cancereling cal 0001059 --- ## Page 67 SECRET. D. Is the information furnished by NOSENKO to CIA concerning KGB operations, personalities, and organization reasonably commen- surate with his claimed KGB career? The conclusion is that the infor mation furnished by NOSENKO concerning KGB operations, personalities, and organization is more than reasonably commensurate with his claimed career in the KGB from mid-March 1953 to his defection in early February 1964. In reaching the above conclusion, consideration has been given to his claimed departmental assignments and claimed positions in each department.. Certain allowance has been made for faulty memory with consideration being given to whether there is any indication of deception or whether the failure to recall a particular item of interest can logically be attributed to the vagaries of the human mind. There is, of course, nu accurate standard of measurement which would permit a positive deter mination as to whether inability to recall certain details or events is actually due to the fact that the human mind cannot recall all past events or could be attributed to willful deception. SECRET GhOUP 1 Excluded from automatici downgrading and declassilication 0001C60 --- ## Page 68 An effort has been made to determine if there are any particular patterns or areas where NOSENKO has indicated he did not recall specific matters or certain details, and no pattern or specific areas have been noted. NOSENKO, in fact, has an unusually good memory as evidenced by the extensive information furnished by NOSENKO purely from recollection. In addition, there has been no material reluctance on the part of NOSENKO to discuss his entire life, KGB officers he has known, KGB organization and procedures, or other topica of interest. NOSENKO has furnished considerable detail concerning KGB officers whom he has known at various periods in his: entire KGB career. He has been very consistent in information furnished and has frequently added certain details which he recalled at a later date. Certain remarks will be made in another section in regard to the volume and scope of information furnished by NOSENKO. This in- formation is not selective, but is an excellent indicator that NOSENKO was assigned to the First Department and Seventh Department, SCD, during the claimed periods of time and held the claimed positions. Con- sideration has been given to his various claimed KGB assignments in evaluating the information furnished in an effort to assess whether his indicated knowledge was commensurate with his claimed position during 2 0001061 SECRET --- ## Page 69 SEEMAL a particular period of time or suggested the possibility that he did not occupy the position which he claimed to have held. It is considered that information furnished by NOSENKO supports his claimed positions in the SCD. It has not been possible to substantially confirm through collateral sources that NOSENKO served in bis claimed positions. Neither has it been possible to obtain from other sources an applicable description of the duties or responsibilities of an individual holding any of the positions NOSENKO claimed to have held after 1958. It is felt there can be no question that NOSENKO served in the capacities of junior case officer, case officer, and senior case officer during 1953 - 1957. As regards the duties and responsibilities of a Deputy Chief of Section, Chief of Section, and Deputy Chief of Department, and whether NOSENKO held these various claimed positions, a considerable amount of personal judgment has been necessary. This personal judgment has been made in as judicial a manner as possible, with full knowledge that any opinion in regard to the above is largely dependent upon information from NOSENKO. NOSENKO bas compiled detailed diagrams of the actual offices he claims to have occupied and surrounding offices during the four pri- mary periods of time: 1953 - 1955, 1955 - 1959, 1960 - 1961, and 1962 - 1963. He has prepared specific memoranda concerning his co-officers 3 0001C62 SECRET --- ## Page 70 and other personnel, and changes of personnel, as well as diagrams of the offices of the Chief and Deputy Chiefs of the SCD during 1956 - 1964. This material is internally consistent. Furthermore NOSENKO could not possibly have known that this detailed information could not immediately be checked for accuracy, at least in part, with a source or another officer who has defected since mid-1964. If these diagrams and memoranda were not relatively correct, NOSENKO, who is quite astute in matters of counterintelligence, would hardly have voluntarily prepared the material in such detail. This type of information is peculiarly adaptable for analysis by a knowledgeable source or by another defector and could, if not relatively correct, permit a rather positive con- clusion that NOSENKO was lying or fabricating information. NOSENKO has furnished quite specific information on KGB operations during the 1953 - 1955, 1955 - 1959, 1960 - 1961, and 1962 - 1963 periods of time. As might be expected, his specific knowledge is less for the 1953 - 1955 period; but his own personal situation and attitude until 1955 - 1956, which are mentioned elsewhere, should be given consideration. In any event, he has furnished adequate information so that his claimed assignment during 1953 - 1955 is considered sufficiently substantiated even though his actual job performance undoubtedly deserved a low rating. 6001063 SECRET --- ## Page 71 SEORET The knowledge of NOSENKO concerning cases, KGB operations, and other officers can consistently be related to his claimed department and position assignment during the 1953 to January 1964 period. The scope of his knowledge of his own department when considered in toto is broader after 1957 than before, which is compatible with his claim of increased responsibilities. His knowledge of the work of other departments of the SCD from the late 1950's on is also more extensive, whick is also a further indication that NOSENKO actually held the claimed positions during this period of time. 5 SECRET 0001084 --- ## Page 72 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 73 SECRET -E. CAN THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY NOSENKO BE CONSIDERED IN TOTO AS HAVING RESULTED IN MATERIAL DAMAGE TO THE KGB AND/OR HAS THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY NOSENKO BEEN OF SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT TO WESTERN INTELLIGENCE? 0001065 SECRET GROUP 1 Excluded tron automatie downaradlag and deciascillestion --- ## Page 74 * 87 SECRET E. Can the information furnished by NOSENKO be considered in toto as having resulted in material damage to the KGB and/or has the information furnished by NOSENKO been of significant beneit to Western Intelligence? The conclusion in regard to both of the above questions is affirmative, even though it is realized that ultimate loss to the KGB and ultimate benefit to Western Intelligence are both partly of an intangible nature and not susceptible to accurate measurement. NOSENKO has, as previously indicated, furnished voluminous information during current and previous interviews. An accurate total oi specific cases is not possible at this time and would at best be only an interesting figure, the actual significance of waich would be marginal. Practically every interview with NOSENKO, even at present, reveals information oi counterintelligence interest and it is expected that this production can continue for a considezable period of time. This should not be construed as an indication thai NOSENKO is intentionally with - colding information, but rather that stimulation of his memory tarougà normal questions and discussions has been and can continue to be productave. SEGRET ser Cannerog 075 0001066 --- ## Page 75 NOSENKO has furnished information concerning perhaps 2, 00) KGB officers and |300)KGB agents or operative contacts (here the terms agents or operative contacts are used io refer to Soviet nationals), mainly in the Second Chief Directorate or internal KGB organizations. However, he has identified approximately (250 former or current First Chief Directorate officers and there is a considerable exchange of officers between the FCD and SCD. In addition, numerous officers of the SCD and other internal KGB organizations travel abroad with delegations, tourist groups, and as visitors to various major exhibitions such as World's Fairs. It is impossible at this time to estimate the number of KGB officers identified by NOSENKO who have been outside the Soviet Bloc since his defection or who will be out sometime in the future. There has been very little attempted exploitation of information furnished'by NOSENKO concerning other XGB officers and, therefore, the possible value of this information to United States Intelligence cannot be estimated nor can the potential damage to the KGB be esti- mated. Disclosure of information concerning certain KGB officers would be a necessary part of any dispatch oi a KGB agent or oíficei to the West either íor purposes of contact with Western Intelligence for a 2 S50P- 0001667 --- ## Page 76 14-00000 limited period oi time or for the placing of the individual in a defector staius. However, identification of KGB officers or agents to Western Intelligence is necessarily a matter of concern to the KGB and the ex- posure of the identities of approximately (2, 000)KGB officers and (several) (hundred) KGB agents could not be considered of negligible importance. Obtaining specific information in regard to KGB officers or KGB assets is important to United States Intelligence and a consider- able amount of manpower and money is spent on this activity. Even acknowledging that it is much more difficult for CIA to obtain this type of information about the KGB, which operates in a closed society, than it is for the KGB to obtain the identity of CIA employees, it is believed doubtiul any reader of this summary would consider that the identifi- cation of 2, 000 CIA employees and(several hundred) agent assets to the KGB would be any less than a very serious compromise of valuable information. Prior to the defection of NOSENIO, little was known of the organization of the SCD or other internal KGB organizations. The information provided by NOSENKO concerning both has been detailed and extensive. That this information is of value to the United States intelligence community is hardly subject io dispute, althouga analysts ( 3 6001068 --- ## Page 77 SECRET can differ as to the weight which should be given to the value of this type of information. NOSENKO has furnished information concerning SCD, KGB, recruitments of United States citizens and foreign nationals covering the period of 1953 through 1963. This should not be interpreted as a statement that NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to all SCD recruitments, even of Americans, during this period.. His infor- mation based on personal knowledge is in general limited to the First Department and Seventh Department. He has furnished information concerning cases of several other departments in the SCD and some FCD cases, but this information was in general acquired indirectly from social or business conversations with other KGB officers. NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to a number of cases which were previously known to United States Intelligence. While the value of such information cannot be considered high, the additional details which NOSENKO has provided in a number of cases cannot be dismissed as being of no value to Western Intelligence, even if the information cannot be regarded as damaging to the KGB. Furthermore, inasmuch as there is no reason to question his sourcing of information already known, there is no basis for suspicion of NOSENKO for his having provided such information. 0001069 CE0027 --- ## Page 78 NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to a number of recruitments. by the KGB of non-Bloc nationals who were known by Western Intelligence to be pro-Communist or even connected with Communist organizations. The identification as a recruited KGB agent of an individual previously known to be pro-Communist is of considerable value to Western Intelligence and may be considered to have resulted in some damage to the KGB. Admittedly, the potential to the KGB of an agent who is known as pro-Communist is less than that of a "politically clean" individual. However, "pro-Communist" or even "Communist" are not synonymous with "recruited KGB agent." NOSENKO has furnished additional information on cases in which there was some previous but limited information. In a number of these instances the additional information from NOSENKO has per- mitted identification of the individuals of interest and the closing of an "'Unknown Subject'' case. In such instances the information from NOSENKO must be considered valuable to Western Intelligence since the incomplete information known previously would in many cases not have permitted ultimate identification of the individual of interest. This category of cases must be considered as having resulted in damage to the KGB and in benefit to Western Intelligence. 5 0001070 SECRET --- ## Page 79 NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to a number of individuals, both American and non-Bloc foreign, who were recruited by the KGB and concerning whom Western Intelligence had no significant information. It is recognized that certain of these cases mentioned by NOSENKO, particularly in the tourist category, would probably never lave actually materialized as productive KGB agents. This could be for various reasons including later refusal to cooperate, later geo- graphical inaccessibility to the KGB, or not being either at the time of SCD recruitment or later in a position to furnish information of interest to the KGB. In this regard, NOSENKO has stated that at least until 1962 there was a definite tendency in the Seventh Department to make a "recruitment" as a statistic for the end-of-year report even though it was apparent the agent at the time had no potential and that it was highly unlikely there would be a potential in the future. NOSENKO has furnished information on or leads to a number of cases, primarily third nationals but some American, in which he has beer unable to furnish sufficient details to permit identification at this time. In certain instances it is believed that an identification will be possible after additional research and investigation. Until an identi- fication is made, the value of any particular lead to Western Intelli- gence cannot be estimated, but thai there may be a potential value 0001071 6 SEGME -as so una --- ## Page 80 14-00000 cannot be ignored. As an example of this category, NOSENKO has furnished a lead, still under investigation, to an unidentified agent, probably not an American, who in 1962 was in a position to remove the "NATO Emergency Codes," deliver the codes to the KGB for photographing, and then successfully replace the codes. Because the agent is as yet unidentified, his current access to information affecting the security of the United States cannot be gauged. In all, the information from NOSENKO in the category of cases where Western Intelligence did not previously have significant infor- mation must be considered on balance as having resúlted in material damage to the KGB and of significant benefit to Western Intelligence. Quantity alone of CI or FI information from a KGB defector is not a standard on which to judge bona fides.. The question is whether the amount of his information is reasonably commensurate with his claimed positions in the KGB. This question as regards NOSENKO has been examined, with affirmative findings, in another section of this paper: A few examples from the above cited categories of information furnished by NOSENKO are listed below. These cases are given as illustrations and are not necessarily listed in order of importance. 7 SECR SOREA 0001072 --- ## Page 81 Ile case oi Robert Lee JOHNSON and the related case of James Allen MINTKENBAUGH have been covered in the previous summary. It can be considered that doth were exposed as a result of a lead from NOSENKO which led to suspicions of JOHNSON. Another American case is that of Herbert HOWARD, a USIA; employee who spent considerable time in the USSR in 1962 - 1963. NOSENKO identified Herbert HOWARD/as having been recruited by. the First Section, First Departmeat, SCD, in 1962 and was positive that (HOWARD) furnished valuable information to the KGB. When interviewed in 1964, HOWARD did not admit he had beer recruited, but suspicion of HOWARD was greai enough so that ais contract with USIA) was not renewed. Li indeed HOWARD was recruited by the KGB, it is impossible to determine how much information would have been compromised by HOWARD; while in the USSR, he did have certain access to the United States Embassy. There is good reason to believe that if HOWARD) was recruited, it was he who was responsible for the compromise of a potentially valuabie Soviet walk-in with whom CIA was attempting to establish contact using HOWARD)as intermediary. NOSENKO in 1964 furnished information in regard to a "ZHARI" (apparently a KGB code name, although NOSENKO thought it was a true 8 0001073 9500E7 --- ## Page 82 mare). Ho identifled "ZHARI" (phonetic) as an Americas code clerk Who delocted to the USSR in 1961. As Internal assumptloa was made annod on the original lend information from NOSENKO that "ZHARI" WaA VICtor NOSIis HAMILTON, abA FOur Mitri HINDALY, & fOrMAT NSA eroplayne who defectad to the USSR In 1962, and the information ¡TOm NOSINKO was never dissemianted or Investigated. Pitor to the surfacing of John Diacoe SMITH by the Sovieta Ra tan tall of 1967, Inlormation conceraing KGB knowledge of Anare code clerks was being taventigated; and John Dineor SaLt was t lending suspoct. After tan surfacing of SMITH by to Soulets, It became apparent that SMITH, rather than HAMILTON, Was Identical to "ZHARI." Invastigation dlacioned thns so dafiaito iritorias. ton could be established in regard to the actual wbereaboute of SMITH after circh mid-1960. It cannot be positivaly sinted font appropriate tavestigation la 1964 of the "ZHARI" load would have led to the identi- fleation of John Discos SMITH as "ZHARI," However, much identifi- cation would bavo been of considerable intarent to the Department ol State and ClA, and could vry wall have perraitted cortala notion which would savo al least lessened the propaganda effect of ta surprina announcement by the Soviora in the fall of 1967. NOSENKO, in June 1962, farniahed Information from walch Wulliam VASSALL could ba quicily identifled. GOLITSYN, la late 1960 - carly 1961, bad furnished Isformation concerning a Soviet pene- ¡Taton of la Britai Goveramant on to badio oilst la Britieb 9 SECRFT --- ## Page 83 Services had complled a list al twenty suspects, Including VASSALL. Iven thoagh is may be presumed thas investigation of the twenty muspecta mould ultimataly have resulted in & determination that VASSALi was the agent on whom GOLITSYN had furnisbed certain information, the information from NOSENKO in June 1962 resulted in the eariler termi- nation by the British Servicen of a still valuable productive KGB agent. Although not the cane of a KGB agent, the matter of the micro- phones is the United States Embanny should also be mentioned. GOLITSYN, following his defection in December 1961, furniahed certain information in regard to microphones in the United States Embaany (Chascary), Since in fact the microphones were connected so contral cables, location of one microphone moald logically bave led so the exposure ol the entira set of micsophones. However, appro- priate action was not taxon on this information and the KGB would have been aware that no action was taken prior to june 1962 when NOSENKO flat contacted CLA. I NOSINKO Is a dispatched KGB agent, it is not clear way the KGB would attract specifie attention to a syatem of microphones which 2n5t have still had some value an ol June 1962. A presumption may Do mado ta: 11 NOSENKO was a dispatched agent, the KGB bad, us of 1962, an advanced system of montioring devices walch rendered the abova microphone system obsolete. Howaves, so concrate evidence of nuch an advanced system in available and it should be noted that it 10 CEORET 0001075 --- ## Page 84 isolat was not until circa April 1964 that any effective action was taken to locate and remove the microphone system to which GOLITSYN had given a lead in late December 1961 - early January 1962. A few general comments in regard to the CI information fur- nished by NOSENKO wald be appropriate in this particular section. As regards leads furnished by NOSENKO to American cases, most of these leads have been mentioned in the previous summary. Current interviews with NOSENKO have resulted in approximately seventeen new American leads which are being examined by the FBI. The inter- views have also resulted in more specific information in regard to à number of cases previously mentioned by NOSENKO, thus permitting additional development of these cases by the FBI. NOSENKO has provided leads to over 100 third-country KGB agents. Geographically these leads are wide in scope, including nationals of such countries as Indonesia, Austria, Uruguay, the United Kingdom, France, West Germany, Belgium, Sweden, Australia, Japan, Mexico, Italy, and a number of other countries. included in the more important of these agent or other leads are leads to high levels of government and intelligence to code clerks, to access agenis fo: American ¡argeis, to actual or possible illegal 0001076 --- ## Page 85 SEU support assets. Also included are foreign correspondents, repre- sentatives of foreign tourist firms, and foreign tourists. A summary of the foreign leads arbitrarily defined as of major significance shows nineteen leads highly placed or formerly highly placed in their own government, four code clerks; eight cases involving definite American interest, and four access agents to Americans. It also shows nine instances of clandestine KGB activity against foreign missions in Moscow, including actual KGB clandestine access into certain Western Embassies (but not the British or American Embassies). NOSENKO has also furnished leads to certain FCD foreign national agents, his information on several being derived during his three months in Geneva in 1962. It is impossible to give an exact evaluation of the significance of the foreign leads furnished by NOSENKO. That they are of signi- ficant value to Western Intelligence and damaging to the KGB is hardly subject to dispute. This evaluation must be given even though there are numerous foreign leads which have not been adequately exploited ai this time. ' As a final note, the implied conclusion in the previous summary is accepted that the failure of NOSENKO to provide usable positive 12 200733 0001026/2 --- ## Page 86 OLUNLI Inselligence Information la no? s signilleant factor in a determination of his bons Ades. The qualification should, howeves, be added that 131= 10t lels tas NOSENKO has, an of this time, bean lally debrieled in many areas of positive intolligence interest. 13 SECRET 0001077 --- ## Page 87 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 88 14-00000 F. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF KCB DECEPTION OR "GIVE AWAY" IN INFORMATION FURNISHED BY NOSENKO WHICH WOULD WARRANT A CONCLUSION THAT NOSENKO WAS DISPATCHED BY THE KGB? 0001078 COUP 1 Exeladed from cotomatic SECRET --- ## Page 89 SECRET F. Is there evidence of KGB deception or "give away" in information furnished by NOSENKO which would warrant a conclusion that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB? The conclusion in this summary is that NOSENKO was not dispatched by the KGB. In reaching this conclusion, a full examination of the above question has been both a necessary and integral part. It is inherent that the volume of information furnished by NOSENKO is only one of the factors which should be given consideration in arriving at a conclusion that NOSENKO was or was not dispatched by the KGB. If NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB, the KGB would have surely been willing to sacrifice certain information of value to the KGB in order to support the bona fides of NOSENKO. However, if NOSENKO was dispatched, it must have been to accomplish or further a KGB purpose or mission, the nature of which has been and continues to be unknown. An examination of the circumstances under which NOSENKO first contacted CIA in Geneva in 1962 and his behavior during these contacts is particularly pertinent since during this period of time NOSENKO would have surely been under direct KGB control if there are any implications of KGB dispatch in the NOSENKO case. Cüur 1 Cond ten dilamatic SECRET 0001079 --- ## Page 90 NOSENKO has stated that his original approach to "sell two pieces of information' was his own idea as to what was most likely to be successful. NOSENKO has stated that he wanted to make a contact with the Americans, was not psychologically adapted to defect at the time, and felt that if he merely stated that be was a "KGB counter- intelligence officer who wanted to give information, " he very possibly would be rejected. It should be noted that NOSENKO even during his first contact did not limit his remarks to the "two pieces of information" and began to talk quite freely on other matters. If NOSENKO was dispatched, it is felt that he, during his 1962 contacts, would have been very carefully briefed and that his remarks or statements would have not been of a nature which could cause any suspicion in regard to the bona fides of NOSENKO. Instead. a current review of his statements and remarks during his five contacts in 1962 indicate that his many errors, exaggerations, and actual lies were quite likely typical of a braggadocio element in the personality of NOSENKO and may also have been evidence supporting the statement by NOSENKO that he usually had a few drinks of liquor before each contact in Geneva. 0001080 SECRET --- ## Page 91 SECRET NOSENKO, during his five contacts in Geneva, made many statements which in retrospect were impossible, and the investigation of which could only have raised certain questions concerning NOSENKO: The following is a list of the more obvious areas in which NOSENKO made gross exaggerations or made incorrect or impossible statements. (a) NOSENKO claimed he personally was with Oleg M. GRIBANOV, Chief of the SCD, during the recruitment pitch to James STORSBERG. (This was a lie and an interview with STORSBERG)with display of photograph would have disclosed that NOSENKO did not participate.) (b) NOSENKO was involved in the recruitment approach to Russell LANGELLE. (This was a lie and LANGELLE was available for interview.) (C) NOSENKO said he recruited LUNT (Horace; (LUNT) in Bulgaria. (Actually NOSENKO never met (LUNT.) 3 6001081 SECRET --- ## Page 92 SEGRET (d) NOSENKO claimed personal contact with (Edmund) STEVENS who, according to NOSENKO, had been recruited by the KGB. (NOSENKO actually had never personally met (STEVENS and only had seen(STEVENS) once at a distance.) (e) NOSENKO dated the recruitment of "ANDREY" in Moscow as 1949-1950. At the same time he furnished information that "ANDREY" (who is considered identical to . Dayle Wallis SMITH) was in Moscow during a part of the time that Roy RHODES, also a recruited agent, was assigned to Moscow, 1951-1953. "ANDREY" (SMITH) was actually in Moscow 1952-1954. (f) NOSENKO said be, GRIBANOV, and another officer met Edward Ellis SMITH. (NOSENKO has since stated he did not meet SMITH and that his only role was obtaining a foreign typewriter and paper for a KGB agent involved in the SMITH operation.) (g) NOSENKO in a number of instances spoke in the first person, saying "We did this," or "We did that, " in reference to a particular KGB activity in whick be now admits 0001082 SECRET --- ## Page 93 he was not involved but had some knowledge. (If NOSENKO was under KGB control in 1962, both he and the KGB should have known that these indicated exaggerations would eventually lead to a question concerning the bona fides of NOSENKO. ) In 1962-1963 a number of similarities were noted between information furnished by NOSENKO and information which had been furnished by GOLITSYN prior to June 1962. These similarities were quite striking and gave riseto certain suspicions of NOSENKO because he provided information which the KGB would presumably have considered already compromised as a result of the defection of GOLITSYN. Certain of the similarities at the time could only be explained in terms of NOSENKO being a dispatched agent. The following are some examples of the similarities noted. (a) Both furnished information in regard to (Johan PREISFREUND! (b) Both furnished information in regard to a military code clerk case (James STORSBERG). (c) Both furnished information in regard to a trip of Vladislav KOVSHUK, under an assumed name, to the United States. (GOLITSYN was sure it was connected with a reactivation of an agent formerly in 5 0001285 --- ## Page 94 Moscow, or a recruitment of an American formerly with the United States Embassy in Moscow; and NOSENKO related it directly to the "ANDREY" case, giving the assumed name which KOVSHUK used. ) (d) Both furnished information in regard to microphones in the United States Embassy in Moscow. (e) Both furnished information in regard to Edmund STEVENS and Isaac Henry SHAPIRO! The above list is not complete nor does it indicate the actual differences in the amount of information furnished on any particular topic by GOLITSYN and NOSENKO. To cite the above in detail in this summary is believed unnecessary since the only point of real interest is whether the fact that NOSENKO was aware of certain events, cases, or situations of which GOLITSYN was also aware raises a legitimate question concerning the bona fides of NOSENKO. The above area of concern has been thoroughly examined and it is considered that the fact that NOSENKO furnished some information on certain cases or situations previously mentioned in lesser or greater detail by GOLITSYN cannot logically be construed as evidence 0001084 6 SECRET --- ## Page 95 SECREI that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB. NOSENKO has during current interviews satisfactorily sourced his information in almost every instance. In a few instances he has said he did not recall how be learned of a particular piece of information but these apparent lapses of memory were not large in number and are considered to be in no way suspicious. The general area in which there was a similarity between information furnished by GOLITSYN in late 1961 - early.1962 and information furnished by NOSENKO in June 1962 and which would have been the most significant insofar as the security of the United States Government was or is concerned related to certain activities centering around or in the First Department, SCD. It is the conclusion of this summary that NOSENKO was an officer of the First Section, First Department, SCD, during 1953-1955 and was Deputy Chief of the same section in 1960 - 1961. Therefore, the fact that NOSENKO furnished information concerning certain cases or situations in the First Department and the fact that GOLITSYN furnished information concerning the same case or situation is not unusual or necessarily suspicious. NOSENKO has stated that GOLITSYN 0001085 cont --- ## Page 96 SECRE? knew and was in contact with other officers of the First Section and GOLITSYN has attributed his knowledge of certain cases or activities of the First Department, SCD, primarily to his association with certain officers in the First Department, SCD. It is recognized that there are certain conflicts in information furnished by GOLITSYN and NOSENKO and at this time it is not possible to satisfactorily correlate certair information from GOLITSYN with information from NOSENKO. Pages 162 - 163 of the previous summary refer to information from GOLITSYN which is characterized as "Information about KGB Operations Agairst Embassy Code Clerks in 1960 - 1961. " The references are to information from GOLITSYN baseo on remarks by Gennadiy Ivanovich GRYAZNOV and Vadim Viktorovich KOSOLAPOV of the First Section, First Department, SCD, and an officer of the Second Section, First Department, SCD. NOSENKO has stated that he was Deputy Chief of the First Section, First Department, SCD, during 1960 - 19ó1, that his primary responsibility was work against code clerks at the United States Embassy in Moscow, and that both KOSOLAPOV and GRYAZNOV were engaged in the same work and under his supervision. The siatement by GOLITSYN 8 SECRET 6001086 --- ## Page 97 that NOSENKO was not Deputy Chief of the First Section in 1960 has been noted and commented on in another section of this summary. GOLITSYN has furnished certain information which he re- ceived from officers of the First Section, First Department, SCD. In each instance where this information, which was fragmentary, could not be immediately correlated with information from NOSENKO, it was previously considered to be evidential of deception or lying on the part of, NOSENKO. This position, however, failed to allow for the possibility that the discrepancies between the two sources were; at least in certain instances, more apparent than real. In certain instances it has now been possible to correlate frag- mentary information from GOLITSYN with information from NOSENKO, making it evident that in these instances the differences could not be construed as in any way reflecting against NOSENKO. The four examples cited below represent two probable correlations, (a) and (b); one possible correlation, (c); and one instance where no correlation is possible at this time, (d): (a) GOLITSYN furnished information which he received in April-May 1960 from Gennadiy GRYAZNOV that an attempt had been made by the KGB to recruit an 0001087 9 SECRET --- ## Page 98 14-00000 SECRET American female employee of the American Embassy in Moscow through a male Soviet friend, but that the attempt had failed. GOLITSYN also furnisbed information that the woman had left Moscow by the time be learned of the information but that the Soviets hoped she would return to Moscow so that further work could be undertaken to effect her recruitment. He did not recall the name of the secretary, but did recall that it was al long and "German) sounding" name. NOSENKO has furnished information in regard to a recruitment attempt against Collette SCHWARZENBACH) who it is considered is identical to the "American secretary" referred to by GOLITSYN. However, (SCHWARZENBACH) (was not a female secretary in the American Embassy, but) had been employed as a secretary to the wife of Ambassador) BOHLEN during 1955 - 1956 and from 1958 - 1959 was employed) las a correspondent by the United Press in Moscow.) The recruitment attempt against SCHWARZENBACH, according to NOSENKO, occurred in 1959 and was an operation of the First Section, First Department, SCD. 0001088 10 REPOCT --- ## Page 99 14-00000 SECRET (b) Page 163 of the previous summary contains infor- mation that GOLITSYN also learned from GRYAZNOV in the spring of 1960 that GRYAZNOV had developed an operation against an American Embassy military code clerk in which the KGB was "99 per cent sure" that the target would be recruited. This is believed to undoubtedly be a reference to the case of (James STORSBERG)who was actually the subject of a recruit- ment approach in 1961. There is considered to be a good possibility that GOLITSYN actually learned of the above information from GRYAZNOV in early January 1961 when he was again in Moscow rather than during the spring of 1960 when GOLITSYN was preparing for his assignment to Helsinki, Finland. This theory is supported by information on page 163 of the previous summary that GOLITSYN has stated he learned in January 1961 from Vladislav M. KOVSHUK (Chief of the First Section) that Johan PREISFREUND) had recently been used in the successful recruitment of an American employee of the Embassy. (Johan PREISFREUND) was used in the(STORSBERG' operation, according to NOSENKO, and NOSENKO was also 0001089 11 SECRET --- ## Page 100 14-00000 SECRET aware that GOLITSYN had a conversation with KOVSHUK about PREISFREUND since GOLITSYN wanted to use (PREISFREUND in Helsinki. NOSENKO has stated he was not present during the above conversation. It is very possible that KOVSHUK exaggerated a little in his conversation with GOLITSYN in the matter of way GOLITSYN could not use PREISFREUND as an agent. NOSENKO has furnished extensive information in regard to the James SIORSBERG case and with due consideration to the accuracy and recollection of GOLITSYN, there does not appear to be an adequate basis for questioning the bona fides of NOSENKO on the basis of the differences between the report- ing by GOLITSYN of information he received from GRYAZNOV concerning what is considered to have been the James) STORSBERG case and detailed information furnished by NOSENKO concerning the James STORSBERG case. The exact date of the recruitment attempt against STORSBERG) has not been positively established, but it is considered to have occurred before early May 1961 and probably in the March-April 1961 period. The statement by James / 6001090 12 SECRET --- ## Page 101 SECRET STORSBERG that it occurred in October 1961 is com- pletely unacceptable and is even contradicted by other statements by STORSBERG himself. (c) Page 163 of the previous summary contains information from GOLITSYN which he had received from GRYAZNOV in April or May 1960 that an American employee of the Embassy in Moscow was either recruited or prepared for recruitment on the basis of a homosexual compromise beginning in 1959 and concluding in 1960. The previous summary also states that according to GOLITSYN, the KGB had photographed the American in various homosexual acts, but SHELEPIN, who had just become Chairman of the KGB, was at the time stressing ideological rather than blackmail recruitments. SHELEPIN did not exclude future use of the photographs which the KGB would hold in reserve. NOSENKO has furnished information concerning the homosexual compromise of Robert BARRETT, who was a guide at the United States Exhibition in Moscow in 1959, and with whom "SHMELEV" and "GRIGORIY", two homosexual 6001031 13 SECRET --- ## Page 102 14-00000 ( agents of NOSENKO, became acquainted. Work against the United States Exhibition was the responsibility of the Ninth Department, SCD, but various Departments were participating under the direction of the Ninth Department. One of the above homosexual agents succeeded in involving BARRETT in homosexual activities which were photographed by the KGB but, according to NOSENKO, although the photographs were of a good quality, the KGB was unable to use the photographs in 1959 because of a general ban by the Central Committee on the recruitment of the United States Exhibition guides due to the planned visit of President EISENHOWER to the Soviet Union. NOSENKO also stated that the compromising material and information on BARRETT was later given to the First Department and that BARRETT was recruited by the Second Section, First Department when he returned with another Exhibition in 1961, and that he, NOSENKO, was not involved in the recruitment operation, BARREIT, following his return 0001092 14 SECRET --- ## Page 103 SECRET. to the United States in January 1962, confessed to the FBI that he had been recruited in 1961 on the basis of compromising photographs which had been taken during his 1959 trip to Moscow. Although it cannot be established at this time, it is possible that the information furnished by GOLITSYN which he had received from GRYAZNOV actually refers to the Robert BARRETT case. It should be noted that Robert BARRETT) could not actually be characterized as an "American employee of the Embassy in Moscow. " (d) Page 162 of the previous summary contains infor- mation from GOLITSYN that in the spring of 1960 when he visited the First Section, First Department, SCD, he learned from GRYAZNOV that GRYAZNOV had as an agent an Embassy code clerk who was scheduled to be transferred to Helsinki. GRYAZNOV indicated to GOLITSYN that the code clerk had already furnished the KGB with some information, that he was 15 0001093 SECRET --- ## Page 104 SECRET considered by the KGB to be a "real"' agent and that if the transfer of the code clerk materialized, GOLITSYN might have the code clerk as an agent in Helsinki. NOSENKO has furnished no information which can be correlated in any way with the above information from GOLITSYN, but neither has the information from GOLITSYN resulted in an identification despite the considerable investigation which has been conducted in the matter. Although this is considered to be a valid lead, it need not necessarily refer to a code clerk who was in the United States Embassy in Moscow during 1960 - 1961. It is also possible that the previous remark by GOLITSYN concerning the above "code clerk" who might be transferred to Helsinki as well as his cited remarke in a-c could be clarified or at least additional information obtained if a specific reinterview on these matters was possible. The trip of Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki, Finland in November 1960 should be mentioned in any comparison of information from NOSENKO with information from GOLITSYN. This conflict is 001CS4 SECRET --- ## Page 105 SECRET also mentioned in another section pertaining to the 1960-1961 career of NOSENKO. GOLITSYN stated that KOSOLAPOV came to Helsinki to accompany an American Embassy code clerk on the train to Moscow and that KOSOLAPOV planned to strike up an acquaintance with the code clerk which could be continued in Moscow. The American Embassy code clerk referred to above was undoubtedly (John GARLAND and the train manifest lists John GARLAND and Viktor KOLOSOV (Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV) as passengers on the same train from Helsinki to Moscow. NOSENKO is aware of the identity of John GARLAND but claims no knowledge of the above trip Of KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki, although being well aware of a previous trip. NOSENKO, as Deputy Chief of the First Section specifically charged with work against code clerks, should have been aware of the November 1960 trip of KOSOLAPOV to and from Helsinki. His lack of knowledge may or may not be explainable in terms of his other activities. such as his trip to Cuba in November-December 1960 but it cannot be interpreted as evidence NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB since, if he had been, the KGB should have briefed NOSENKO on the trip of KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki in November 1960, as this was an event the KGB knew GOLITSYN was aware of. 6001095 17 SEPPET --- ## Page 106 A theory which bas previously been given consideration and warranted full consideration was that if NOSENKO was dispatched, his mission was to confuse leads furnished to American Intelligence and/or to denigrate the value of information furnished by GOLITSYN. In connection with this theory, it should be noted that NOSENKO during current interviews has not made any remarks which could in any way be construed as derogatory to GOLITSYN. In addition, NOSENKO does not claim to have any detailed knowledge of the FCD and frequently, when some topic peculiar to the FCD has been broached with NOSENKO, his immediate reply has been to the effect that "I didn't work in the FCD, " or "You should ask GOLITSYN about that. " In connection with any consideration of whether the contact of NOSENKO with CIA in Geneva in June 1962 could have been initiated by the KGB as a result of the defection of GOLITSYN, the timing of certain events should be noted. GOLITSYN defected on 15 December 1961. NOSENKO departed from Moscow in March 1962 for Geneva, Switzerland, where he remained until 15 June 1962. It is felt that it would have been practically impossible if not impossible for KGB officials to complete an assessment of the actual or potential damage which could result from the defection of GOLITSYN, 18 6001096 --- ## Page 107 SECREI select NOSENKO as the individual who would be dispatched to counter act the possible damage, and appropriately brief NOSENKO prior to his departure for Geneva in March 1962. Therefore, if NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB, it would appear that plans for this would have predated the defection of GOLITSYN and that any GOLITSYN aspect could only be a related aspect and not the basis for the original plan to dispatch NOSENKO. In addition, if NOSENKO was dispatched, it would hardly seem necessary for the KGB to send NOSENKO to Geneva two and one-half months before his first contact with CIA. The theory has also been considered that NOSENKO could have been dispatched to confuse and divert American Intelligence and thus to protect an important KGB penetration or penetrations of the United States Government, particularly CIA. This is a theory which should and has been given full consideration, but it is not possible to factually substantiate of refute this theory in the absence of specific information that high-level KGB penetrations do or do not exist. Actually, as regards NOSENKO, the primary area which should be given consideration in the above matter is if all the information from NOSENKO is accepted, what effect would or could it have on the efforts 19 SECRET 0001997 --- ## Page 108 14-00000 ( SECRET of American counter-intelligence tó determine the identity of and take appropriate action against KGB penetrations of the United States Government. The only answer to this question seems to be that there would be little consolation or assurance to American intelli- gence even if every statement by NOSENKO was accepted at face value. The only specific area in which NOSENKO could be even con- sidered to claim full knowledge is the United States Embassy in Moscow. In this area his statements could be construed as assurance that there were no recruitments of American personnel in the, United States Embassy in Moscow from 1953-December 1963 with the exception of "ANDREY" (Dayle Wallis SMITH) and Herbert HOWARD. The basis for this expressed opinion of NOSENKO is considered elsewhere in this summary and analysts may differ as to whether a recruitment could have occurred of which NOSENKO did not have knowledge, assuming that his statements are made in good faith. It should be noted, however, that at this time there is no specific information which is in direct conflict with the expressed opinion of NOSENKO. NOSENKO, as previously mentioned, has never claimed any particular knowledge of FCD activities, In addition, he does not claim to be aware of all recruitments of Americans by the SCD. As an • 20 6001C98 - 1980099 --- ## Page 109 SECRET example, be has made it clear that his knowledge of SCD activities against members of delegations, foreign businessmen, foreign students, and individuals in the USSR on the invitation of a Soviet organization or a component of the Soviet Government is extremely limited and at best mainly of a collateral nature. NOSENKO does not even claim any detailed knowledge of activities of the Second Section (Active Line) of the First Department, SCD, nor does he claim to know all of the cases of which the Chief of the Seventh Department was aware. The latter is specifically supported by certain notes brought out by NOSENKO which are short references to a number of Seventh Department cases which are identified only by the KGB code name. These notes, according to NOSENKO, were made when he had an opportunity to review a notebook held by the Chief of the Seventh Department and constitute the only knowledge NOSENKO had of these particular cases. 6001099 21 SECRET --- ## Page 110 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 111 14-00000 SECRET G. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF A POLITICAL OR ANY OTHER TYPE OBJECTIVE WHICH COULD JUSTIFY A DISPATCH OF NOSENKO BY THE KCB WITH PERMISSION TO SPEAK FREELY TO CIA CONCERNING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE KGB AND WITHOUT NOSENKO BEING GIVEN A SPECIFIC MISSION OR NESSIONS? 0001100 SECRET CROM 1 downgrading and declassifisation --- ## Page 112 SE6.21 G. Is there evidence of a political or any other type objactive waich could justify a dispatch of NOSENKO by the KGB wick permission to speak freely to CIA concerning his knowledge of the KGB and without NOSENKO being given a specific mission or missions? The above possi- bility has been given consideration even though the ultimate ramifications are practically incalculable. The conclusion is that as regards NOSENKO, with the single exception detailed below, there is no evidence of a political or other type objective which could be considered of sufficient importance by the KGB to warrant the dispaich oi a KGB offices with the knowledge of NOSENKO to speak freely with CIA without his being given a specific mission or missions by the KGB. It is accepted that the Soviet leadership would be entirely capable of instructing the KGB to dispatch a staff officer for permanent defection to United States authorities with no specific intelligence mission and no limitations on the KGB intelligence information he miga reveal providing . that such act would, in the estimate of the leadersaip, result in a net political gain for the USSR. For such a possibility to be seriously entertained by the Soviets, however, it wouid have to involve an issua of majoi importance to the Soviet leatership and presumably would save to 0001101 EGRET --- ## Page 113 be considered by them as the only or at least the best means of achieving we desired end and of having i very hige probability of success. The only area touched upon in any way by NOSENKO which might meet the above requirements is the assassination of President Kennedy: the involvement of Lee Harvey Oswald in the assassination and his association with the Soviet Union. 'Given (a) speculation obtaining at the time that there was Soviet involvement in the assassination, (b) tbe premise that in fact there was'no Soviet involvement, and (c) a hypothesis that the Soviet leadership was deeply concerned lest erroneous conclusions be drawn which could lead to irreversable actions, it is conceivable that the Soviet leadership migat have been prepared to take extreme steps to convince United States authorities of their non-involvement in the assassination. (The passage so the United States Government of the aliegedly complete Soviet consuia: file on OSWALD was, in itself, an unprecedented aci.) The NOSENKO case warrants examination in the above regaid in light of the fact that among the information NOSENKO provided was "inside" KGB information on OSWALD: infornation waich purpoiiedy 00011C2 2 --- ## Page 114 revealed the substance of the content of tae KGB files on OSWALD. This information clearly indicated tha: there was no KGB relationship with OSWALD, that the KGB had no operational interest in OSWALD, and that as a matter of fact OSWALD had presented the KGB with a continuing series of problems. Upon examination, however, NOSENKO does not meet the requirements premised above for serious Soviet consideration of a free KGB defection. The following reasons render this unacceptable: a. The chronology, in itself, presents virtually impossible problems for such a theses, viz. NOSENKO's initial approach to CIA in June 1962, 17 months prior to the assassination of President Kernedy. b. While the information from NOSENKO on OSWALD is interesting and pertinent, it is not, in nature, scope, and content, sufficiently convincing for United States authorities to reasonably be expected to conclude that it zepresented unequivocal proof oi Soviet nor-involvement. c. It is implausible not to assume that the Sovicts would assume that United States authorities, in any examination of the possibility of a Soviet (KGB) hand in the assassination, wouid presume 3 0001103 --- ## Page 115 extrernely narrow Soviet compartmentation in such an operation -- a compartmentation which would exclude knowledgeability by any KGB officer other than very senior persons and an individual os group of action individuals specifically concerned with matters of this nature. The KGB career of NOSENKO would not permit even serious consideration that NOSENKO could have logically been fitted into the above very limited category. It is accordingly concluded that the possibility of a politically motivated free dispatch can in the case of NOSENKO be satisfactorily eliminated. The possibility has also been considered that the KGB might have theorized that by dispatching an agent, in this case an officer, with numerous leads to non-valuable or non-curient KGB agents or cases, the facilities of the United States Intelligence community would be practically neutralized for an extended period of time. This could only be based on an assumption that the United States Intelligence community would involve a major portion of its personnel and efforts in the investigation and resolution of cases which had little or no curzent or potential value to the KGB. The above possibility cannot be arbitrarily eliminatod without full consideration. It is nos believed that 0001104 --- ## Page 116 SECR NOSENKO in the absence of any evidence that he had any KGB mission oi missions to fulfill comes within the above category, particularly since ân overall assessment of his information leads to the conclusion that full exploitation of his information would be quite damaging to the KGB. Consideration of the above possibility must also include an evaluation of the deterrent effect on the prospects of future recruitments by the KGB caused by legal action taken against individuals exposed by information from the dispatched agent or officer. The deterrent offect on others of the conviction and sentercing of persons who have committed a crime or: crimes has long been a part of the legal theory of way persons who commit a crime should be imprisoned or punished. The deterrent effect on others of the trials and convictions of William VASSALL, Robert Lee JOHNSON and James Allen MINTKEN- BAUGH should not be underestimated. The KGB also could not have inown that information furnished by NOSENKO would not result in the trial and conviction of other KGB agents or recruitments concerning whom NOSENKO had some knowledge. 5 0001105 --- ## Page 117 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 118 SECRET H. IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE THAT THE CONTACTS OF NOSENKO IN 1962 OR IN 1964 WITH CIA WERE KNOWN TO THE KGB PRIOR TO HIS DEFECTION OR THAT NOSENKO WAS EVER BRIEFED BY THE KGB RELATIVE TO HIS BEHAVIOR OR KGB OBJECTIVES DURING THESE CONTACTS OR AFTER HIS DEFECTION? 0001106 SECRET Excluded from automatic dowagrading and desiasal icallan --- ## Page 119 SECRET H. Is there any evidence that the contacts of NOSENKO in 1962 or in 1964 with CIA were known to the KGB prior to his defection or that NOSENKO was ever briefed by the KGB relative to his behavior or KGB objectives during these contacts or after his defection? The conclusion is that there is no evidence that the contacts of NOSENKO in 1962 or in 1964 with GIA were known to the KGB prior to his defection and that NOSENKO was never briefed in any manner by the KGB. The basis for the above conclusion is substantially contained in previous sections. It is being treated here as a separate area of interest since it is a sufficiently important area as to warrant individual consideration. It is recognized that since positive factual confirmation such as the KGB file on NOSENKO is not available, any conclusion concerning whether NOSENKO was or was not dispatched by the KGB can only be based on the full review of available information from NOSENKO, collateral sources, independent investigation and the opinion of the individual analyst concerning the significance or non-significance of each item of available information. The conclusion that the contacts of NOSENKO with CIA in 1962 and 1964 prior to his defection were not known to the KGB is 0001107 SECRET Excited dron automalle dannarading and 1:3.31.1049 --- ## Page 120 SECREA necessarily based in part on a judgment as to whether any of his activities or information logically warrant a substantial suspicion that they were or could be in any part the result of KGB direction or control. One of the particular areas considered was his apparent behavior during his contacts with CIA in June 1962 and the conclusion was that it was incomprehensible that he could have been under KGB control at that time. Consideration has been given to the possibility that his 1962 contacts with CIA were not known to the KGB, but became known to the KGB later and NOSENKO was doubled by the KGB. It was con- cluded that there was no basis for or information which would warrant serious consideration of the above possibility aside from the separate conclusion that the KGB would be very unlikely to reward a traitor in KGB eyes by sending him again to Geneva where he would be quite free to defect. Worthy of comment in this section is the fact that NOSENKO, during his 1962 contacts, expressed considerable concern over his personal security, requesting that knowledge concerning his identity be kept to an absolute minimum, that no communications be sent to the 2 0001108 SECRET --- ## Page 121 14-00000 S=6.27 Varied States Embassy in Voscow cuncerning lis contact wit. CIA and that he did not wish io be contacted and wouid not recognize any attempted contact within the Soviet Union. NOSENKO also furnished information as to tse reason for his concein thai no information regarcing his contact with CiA become known in the United States Embassy in Moscow and the dangers to NOSENKO in any contact o, attempted contact with NOSENKO in the USSR. It is recognized that the above indicated concern of NOSENKO about his personal security is noi substantial evidence thai NOSENKO was not under KGB control; however, it is evidence that NOSENKO was not in any way encouraging clandestine contact of NOSENKO within the USSR, which very likely would have been an aim of the KGB if NOSENKO was under KGB control. The material which NOSENKO furnished to CIA in 1964 has been carefuily reviewed to determine if there is any evidence that the KGB participated in any way in the assembling of this rather unique collection oi material. None of the material appeais to have been of an accountable type and, on the contrary, it appears thai NOSENKO could hava furnissed all of the material to CIA and returned to the Soviet Urion without the KGB ever at a later date becoming aware that the material was actually missing. The latter statement even inciudes the travel dogument Which audorized the trip o NOSENKO to Gorkiy in December 1963. 00011C9 3 --- ## Page 122 The tip in December 1963, according to NOSENKO, was to participate in the search for Aleksandr CHEREPANOV. According to NOSENKO, this particuiar documeni was not accountable in that it was only necessary to turn it in when requesting reimbursement for travel expenses. NOSENKO stated tat e had not claimed te rather small amount of money to waico he was entitled and has also admitted that he really brought the document along because it gave him the indicated rank of Lieutenan: Colonel. NOSENKO has completely retracted his claim io baving had the rank of Lieutenant Coionel, stating that ever as a Deputy Chief of Dapasi ment be was only a Captain althoug, he was entitled to and expected to receive the rank of Major in early 1964. NOSENKO bas stated that giving him the rank of Lieutenant Colonel in the above document was the error Of KASHPEROV, the officer on duty in the SCD on Sunday, and. that practically all Deputy Chiefs of Department in the SCD had at least the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. The above explanation by NOSENKO may well be considered by readers with at least a degree of skepticisma. However, if NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB, it would seem that he could have been pro- viced with something a little move substantial to document his claim oi the rank of Lieutenant Colonei, In addition, it would seem that the KCB 0001110 SECRET --- ## Page 123 14-00000 SEUNEi could have provided NOSENKO with some type of document waice would support at least one of his claimed positions in the SCD, KGB. Even the Cherepanov Papers do not in any way support the claim oi NOSENKO that be was Deputy Caies of the First Section, First Depariment, SCD, in 1960 - 1961, nor do they even support the claim of NOSENKO that there was such à position in the First Section in 1960 - 1961 0r even in 1958 or 1959. 0001111 5 --- ## Page 124 IV --- ## Page 125 14-00000 SECRET IV. COMMENTS CONCERNING PREVIOUS CONCLUSIONS IN REGARD TO NOSENKO 0001112 SECRET Excluded trai 298233 --- ## Page 126 SECRET COMMENTS CONCERNING PREVIOUS CONCLUSIONS IN REGARD TO NOSENKO Attached is a verbatim copy of pages 357 - 360 of the "Examina- tion of the Bona Fides of a KGB Defector"' which contains seven (A - G) primary conclusions concerning the claimed Naval RU (Navy Intelligence) and KGB career of NOSENKO. These conclusions or findings are independently treated in separate attachments. With the exception of "G," the conclusions in this summary are in direct conflict with the above conclusions and are basically that NOSENKO served in the Naval RU from March 1951 to early 1953, was a KGB officer from March 1953 until his defection in February 1964, and held his claimed positions in the *KGB during the March 1953 - February 1964 period. * For purposes of clarity, the term KGB is used to refer to the Committee for State Security and predecessor organizations unless otherwise indicated. Aïtachment: Cpy Pgs 357-360 of "Examination of the Bona Fides of a KGB Defector" SFCRFT CROST congrading anu dadlassiticalion 0001113 --- ## Page 127 SECRET PREVIOUS CONCLUSIONS RE NOSENKO AS CONTAINED ON PAGES 357 - 360 OF "THE EXAMINATION OF THE BONA FIDES OF A KGB DEFECTOR" The following is a quote of the previous conclusions in the case of Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO. (The specific conclusions have been given the designation of A - G for purposes of easier correlation with other sections of this summary.) "SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS CONCERNING NOSENKO'S BONA FIDES" "NOSENKO claims that he served for a decade in the KGB in successively senior positions of auhority from which he derived extensive knowledge of the scope, character, and results of KGB operations against Americans in the Soviet Union in the period 1953-1963. To substantiate his claim, he provides an impressive array of information about KGB personnel, organization and opera- tions which, to the extent that it has been confirmed, is presumptive evidence of his bona fides. Various Soviet officials, including intelligence officers, have generally corroborated NOSENKO's claims. According to some of these sources, NOSENKO was a senior KGB officer who occupied a series of sensitive positions, who 0001114 # :117797 --- ## Page 128 SECKLi enjoyed considerable authority and trust despite personal short. comings, and whose defection, 'the greatest loss ever suffered by Soviet Intelligence', paralyzed the work of at KGB • Legal Residency, and justified the formulation of plans to assas-. sinate him." "The examination has compared each element of NOSENKO'e biography relevant to his claimed KGB service with known facts and reasonable surmise. The examination reflects the test to which his accounts were put: whether his accounts are internally coherent and consistent with known fact, and whether he actually gained the information he has from occupying the KGB positions he claims to have held. In short, is he what he says he is, according to his own accounts?" "This examination had led to the following findings, arrived at independently: A. NOSENKO did not serve in the Naval RU in any of the capacities or at the places and times he claimed. B. NOSENKO did not enter the KGB in the manner or ai the time he claimed. C. NOSENKO did not serve in the American Embassy Section throughout the 1953-1955 period as he claimed. 6001115 --- ## Page 129 Lite bad i o ones to D. During the period 1955-1960, he was neither a senior case officer in, nor Deputy Chief of, the Seventh Department American-British Commonwealth Section. E. NOSENKO was neither Deputy Chief of the American Embassy Section nor a senior officer or supervisor in the Section during the period 1961-1962.. (sic) F. NOSENKO's claims, that in 1962 he was Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section and was thereafter a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department, are not credible. G. NOSENKO has no valid claim to certainty that the KGB recruited no American Embassy personnel between 1953 and his defection in 1964. These findings differ somewhat with respect to degree of probability. or certitude, but they reflect the preponderance of available evidence in each instance. " "The above judgments, if correct, rebut presumptive evidence of NOSENKO's bona fides. The contradictions in NOSENKO's accounts of his life and KGB service are so extensive as to make his claims as a whole unacceptable.. While truth and fact in this case frequently 0001116 SECRET --- ## Page 130 cannot be established with certainty, it is evident that truth and fact are not what NOSENKO relates. By almost any test, virtually any of NOSENKO's above claims are impugned by fact or probability, or contradicted or retracted in his own statements. NOSENKO is not what he claims to be, and thus he is not a bona fide defector." "Given the conclusion that NOSENKO is not a bona fide defector, it is necessary to attempt to determine his true motives for contacting American Intelligence and for providing the information he has given. Here, it must be recognized that the evidence, largely consisting of NOSENKO's own assertions, does not permit unequivocal conclusions. Nevertless, the question cannot be ignored.: The character of the information NOSENKO has conveyed, the fact that some of his false claims have been corroborated by Soviet officials, and the necessity to make decisions about NOSENKO's future all require that at least a provisional judgment be made. " "Of the reasonable explanations advanced for NOSENKO's misrepresentations, the chief ones are that he is a swindler posing as a former KGB officer for reasons of personal advantage; that he suffers irom a deranged personality or unbalanced mind; that he has greatly exaggerated his actual rank, status and access in the KGB, for simply personal reasons; or, finally, that he is a dispatched KGB agent. " 0001117 --- ## Page 131 SEÜNEI "The first two possibilities are easily dismissed. That NOSENKO is not simply a swindler who falsely claims for personal advantage to have been a KGB officer is evident, we believe, from the confirmed details of KGB organization, personnel and operations which he has provided and which could only derive from within the KGB itself. " "Second, as noted in the text, extensive psychiatric and psychological examination by qualified specialists rule out the possibility that NOSENKO's actions and testimony are the product of a deranged personality or unbalanced mind." "It is somewhat more plausible that NOSENKO is a KGB officer who served in at least some of the components for some or all of the time periods that he claims, but who greatly exag- gerated his positions, rank and access to intormation, and invented some matters outright, to achieve greater status with American Intelligence. This explanation, however, fails to accommodate the fact that several KGB officers have asserted that NOSENKO did in fact hold senior positions in the KGB. Also, NOSENKO's assertions with respect to his rank, GRIBANOV's patronage, the recall telegram, and the like, cannot be just a product of his own invention, since these were the subject of comment by other sources." .""..": 6001118 PLODET --- ## Page 132 SECRET "Because none of the above explanations is consistent with the data developed in interrogations and investigations, we are left with the hypothesis that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB. While this explanation does not reconcile all the anomalies, none of them renders it untenable. " "In the absence of further revelations by NOSENKO, or other persuasive evidence to the contrary, CIA finds that the evidence establishes a presumption that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB, and believes that prudence requires that he be regarded as still responsive to KGB control, and that his infor- mation should be assessed accordingly. " 6001119 CECRET --- ## Page 133 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 134 14-00000 SECRET NOSENKO DID NOT SERVE IN THE NAVAL RU IN ANY OF THE CAPACITIES OR AT THE PLACES AND TIMES HE CLAIMED SECRET CAGUP 1 Excludes from automatich degrading and declassifier lan 0001120 --- ## Page 135 SECRET A. NOSENKO did not serve in the Naval RU in any of the capacities or at the places and times he claimed. (Previous conclusion) The above is conclusion "A" in the previous summary in regard to NOSENKO. The current conclusion is that the claimed service of NOSENKO in Navy Intelligence (Naval RU) during March 1951 to early 1953 in the Far East and the Baltic areas is adequately substantiated and should be accepted. The interrogations of NOSENKO prior to 1967 were complicated by NOSENKO changing the date of his graduation from the Institute of International Relations from 1950 to 1949 because he did not wish to admit that he had failed to graduate in 1949 with the majority of his class. However, previous efforts of NOSENKO to revert to his original 1962 statement that he graduated in 1950 were not accepted and an unwarranted significance was given to the 1949 - early 1953 period of time. It is considered that NOSENKO has adequately explained his "stupid blunders" as they relate to the above and to certain other personal matters and that his claimed service in Navy Intelligence from March SECRET GROUPT downgrading and 0001121 --- ## Page 136 ( SLUMLA. 1951 to early 1953 both in the Far East and the Baltic area is fully acceptable. It is not considered necessary to comment concerning all of the remarks in the previous summary regarding the claimed Naval RU service of NOSENKO as reflected on pages 49-59 and remarks will, for purposes of brevity, be limited in scope. The statement is made in the previous summary that "The sole Headquarters RU officer NOSENKO identified was the Personnel Chief, Colonel KALOSHIN. He identified no ranking officers in either'the Baltic or Far East Intelligence Staffs. Some 30 GRU officers he did identify, by his own admission, NOSENKO knew not from his Naval RU service, but through social acquaintance, later, in Moscow, or through his visits to Geneva. ": Attached is a copy of a handwritten memorandum voluntarily prepared by NOSENKO in late 1967 containing the names of a number of GRU personnel of whom he had some knowledge. The attached was not prepared as the result of any inquiry concerning his claimed Naval RU service, but was only a small part of the material prepared by NOSENKO at this time. The entire material included remarks by NOSENKO regarding approximately (875)KGB officers, (100) KGB agents, 35 GRU officers and 400 other Soviet nationals. 0001122 SECRET --- ## Page 137 shei It is interesting to note that the attached list contains the names of approximately 20 GRU officers whom NOSENKO relates to the early 1950's period. In addition, NOSENKO has, during current interviews and in other memoranda, furnished the names of additional Navy Intelli gence personnel whom he knew in the 1951 - early 1953 period. Page 52 of the above summary and other related pages question whether NOSENKO ever served in the Baltic area with Naval Intelligence and even question his geographical knowledge of the area. Attached is a copy of a handwritten memorandum with certain diagrams prepared by NOSENKO on 21 February 1968 concerning his assignment with Navy Intelligence in the Far East and the Baltic area. The memorandum was completed by NOSENKO without any reference material and a review of his diagrams indicates they are quite accurate. NOSENKO had previously stated that his service in the Baltic area was at Sovetsk Primorskiy and during current interviews recalled that the former name of the place, an almost deserted fishermen's village, was Fishausen. The previous designation given by NOSENKO for this place as having the mail address of Sovetsk Primorskiy had caused the conclusion that his alleged place of assignment was non- existent. A further check in the matter would have disclosed that the place was not nonexistent, that it is currently known as Primorsk and that the former German name of the fishing village was Fischhausen. 3 6001123 --- ## Page 138 The previous summary also stated that despite his claimed active commissioned service in the Navy, NOSENKO knew nothing of Soviet Navy tradition, doctrines, or organization of procedures. It should be noted that there is a considerable difference between being a member of the Naval RU and being an actual member of the Soviet. Navy. The situation could be compared to a career civilian employee of the Office of Naval Intelligence and a line officer in the United States Navy• Attachments: List of GRU Personnel as Prepared by NOSENKO Diagrams and comments as Prepared by NOSENKO 6001124 SECRET --- ## Page 139 sekrenew Leonid - till 1952 or 1s53 a deputy of chief t nacy inteli gene, they a chinf of mary itlligeure, later he was a deputy of dief. f gal (Sezor Such and Isashutiny, I heard be was a navy attache in the ust. for Malarients 2. bespalor - amajor, code desk of the very intellizence of 7 ficet in Sorest Marbow's region in 195T-1952 3. boydanooskiy a deputy of chief of the navy intellizenerof 7 Fleet (on agents) in 1951-1952. 4. Bulakh - an officer of the ravy intelligence print of intelligenc of te 4 Fleet in Sovietsk, Kaliningrad's distriét in 1852. 5. Chikin - in 1350- a colonel, rooked in ti departuret of foreiza ins of the ministry of defence. 6. hurril'skiy - a colonel, in 1850 cooked in the depastment of forcign, afflins of the misistry of dofence. 7. Demohenko an offic if nary intelligence point of intelligence if 4Fbet in Sovietsk, Kaliningrad's district. 8. Denisento - in 1962-1954 a military attache of soviet embassy in Bern. . Bolishakoo Yuri - au officer f GRIl (colonel), was in the USA, marks whor. cons of press-agency Newss." lo. Bulgaria Ler 1, in 1950= world in gRU. 11. Soliyer - du fficer if jU i 1150f. (or Syerler) 12. Kaloshin - a colonel, in 1150-455 a chief of personnel department. the navy intelligence 0001125 13. Kononyuk - in 1950 finished the institute of internatisual relations, i. 1917 Inton in the house istellierree sud cant toerant in Borde draine --- ## Page 140 1. Kipalkiu - a generel, in 1$90 t nos aidepeity of chief the military diplimetic aondesmy, Ne hes tire sous: Kepalkiu Sergey- finchid this acudteny in 4950, oorks in gRH, woiked in Halg und in Fzause, his nöifena drughtör if Mirishel Tinioshento - Olya Efinishil the istituti f fozeign treds); Kapalkirtie- Tor in 1s4os studed as a student in the USt, alsa woks in gRU. - inn. 5: Kabalinor Vadimir - a major, a serion offices if the hay intellizsuce 3f 7 Fleet in 1950- 52. 46. Khaberoo - in 19r0-52 n dipuity of chif of nery radio ditachiment f the nary intelligence of 7 Féeet 17. Khaytor S.S. =a depraty of chif (on information) of nary intelli - *P 7 Fleet in 1550-52 18: Kon'kox - adepent f chif if hacy intellizeuse of 7 Flict in 1951-52 1s. Rozlorskig - in iss0= suofficer of depostucut f fozciga offairs of the ministry of dofence. 20. Molchunor - au ifficer of gAU (in 1350-) 21. Orchhor Geuscadi - in 1951-52 uu admimistzatice ifficer of the waoy in - Telligence if 7 Fliet 20. Pegodiu Boris - a chiof ff- the serziteriate of musy intellizeuce f 7 Fleet in 1950-1952, tavas a japaneze länguage. 23. Kezantseo-- a coumander of iung inteCeizeuce point of the inteGlizeure 4 Fect in Sovetsk , kaliningrid's düstiot in 1152. .24. Shalin - a geueral, in 1340 = noes a chief of the kitilitory diplizuatic de.- dimy, later ses a chief of JR4. WDIIZG 25. Shanestuiker dueil madruisl warks in YRUl: his fatter vara masslallsi --- ## Page 141 26 Mel'nikor Seryay - a chif of woy intilligence of 7 Ilet i 190-52. 27. Nasugaladze -ayeurl, a chief of navy ütilêiguce nt Blacki ses; 1950-52 28. sergeyes - an cnjiner-biacolivel, a senior sfices of the naty . intelligence if7 Fleet in 1507-54 (carlier hi worked in Turkey). 11. Suslotick - in 1300-52 a crmmcrelce of sacyadio datadment of the mary intelligeme if 7 Fteet. 30: Srishehunov - au ifficer ef JCU, coondied in the USA, hest yiues in thn din , from sshere was recalled . :31. Tisiein, - a zuna-aduizel, is E550-5e é depety diif f te nary iste - Mipenne of the ministry of militzzy wary. 32. Vasilevskiy Yuri - works in IEU, son of a muestel of Utk 33. Voroukro Alsbert -un officer of lhe masy intelligeute f 7 Ilect in 1952 34. Torantser Micherl- a viec aliviznl, a fosuer chief f hacy inteligena (yasi, mVgihe hactata dostorof tde fent wodes in post leniegaid, ascamhives egritfetgas 35. Yershrr - an effüer ef persoucl of the hacy intelligonie f 7 Tert- in 1950-52, Rreoos a chinize lasignaye. 0001127 SECRET --- ## Page 142 .vi-t Te tô ef Mareh, ihs tas sigkind an orler allount ly e. pocitment es oa interpritor of the mary üntellizence of 7 F8it in Soviet herbar, Primorskiy district., ahere 1 hunss goer. by i train and arrived in the plice if my agsicitucut inthe end of March: (I rocut from tilaseeo to Khabarrost, sshere. chauged on train to Komsosolsk-on-tmur ther crossed the Syatis pm statin Pirul west tE Srie hn (totie Bay banin Pay Postorujes, u meset Zhildirbait, sity Soviet heboe feisland Sukkalis. The intellizeuce of 7 Flect was loasitid in lay Costroays, herc. oive also Pelitioal directory ef I Flecti, submarinis and distrigias basei. ui hiadquartens of 7 Fleit was triten in settlcmnnt iteldozi He conusandes in oief f 7 Flict,was aduizal Baykor trasd., chief of staff - rice-atmiral Fasatinro. $001128 He chiif of ny intelizence of 7 Fleet was captain of leunh Wie Enikor Sergen K., dis denitis- en iticin of 2 zack Goglascoskep --- ## Page 143 , giutis department), capitaco if 1zante Khaytio Someu S: (iformotion dtipeitnet, copptaiaf teik Kaiike( naoy int llijent), colonat Buzchenko (a commissar). I I noas working in the infarmeition dliguertrcut: tfhaers Kabaline; Efimo' were working in this degartacuit. Oller officers of the inteligans. ocre lietananit-coluel Sergeysr, lintesuit berautior Albert, ugjir Sishor, ca teins Orekhor, Rodisuor, Pogodhio, Besprulou and 3-4 mar ofroers, here vere also siargesits aul privates. In the end of April, 1752 I Pless in Maseors (stogping for 12 dlgs ins Khaharosk) for a liare. chif clircetiry: In fuse -fuly IsTe a persemat desartment of thitnauy intelli jusse (a chif -coloual kaloshinn) was deciting a peestièn abouit- tersfrano briarse of illuass. Mud t was appiineted ins the iri intelligence prisit of naoy intelligsues of H Fleet in Sowistsk (lo- catid bifere a peninsula ti Bültügsk-forsier Pillau), rohece I errived in August, 1952.(Kaliuiugrud's district-fornic fuesin) Soviet is a litle sity-viliaje, a fornee german village of fish crisen, it seems had ai hamue. Fishhassen. Sövritsk Surüitsk - a denrlishied Citelitiwn, here lhiri isteltigiaoe pruil aud ' otters niletary detackmeuits (fuiliing baittalion)." 6001129 Baltigse Bültüyst. uns n buse and hendguinters of 4 Fleet --- ## Page 144 The chief of my nary intellizou prist was arpitain of 2 wink Kyszantico. Hue were fficers: Pinogrador, Bulakh, Denchenko and others wilt serged; and privates. bufore my errine (d degs) this wasy intellizuce point ans tansfe- nd from eest gerainy in Smist. If in Jerummy the work of the point was sonnested with agit's work, how thee was whather tash - a preparation of agent of territion past in a ease of noser (544 persous reak poet). - an alsolidly monkey bussness In the end of December I took a lers zasining it will hay illuess, his herring in mind a transference in unither plase In mid of March, 45s I began to work in 2 chief diretery flys, (fare 1102) 0001130 --- ## Page 145 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 146 14-00000 SECRET B. NOSENKO DID NOT ENTER THE KGB IN THE MANNER OR AT THE TIME HE CLAIMED SECRET taungrading and declaratara 6001131 --- ## Page 147 SECRET B. NOSENKO did not enter the KGB in the manner or at the time claimed. (Previous conclusion) The above is conclusion "B" in the previous summary in regard to NOSENKO. The conclusion in this summary is that NOSENKO entered the then Second Chief Directorate, MVD, in mid-March 1953 and that his entry was not only facilitated by but due to the influence of General Bogdan Zakharovich KOBULOV. Previous statements by NOSENKO and changes relative to date of entry into the KGB have been mentioned in another section of the summary and will not be repeated here. His statements during current interviews that he entered on duty in mid-March 1953 as a case officer in the First Section, First Department, Second Chief Directorate, MVD, are con- sidered adequately substantiated and should be accepted. The conclusion of the previous summary (pages 61-74) that NOSENKO did not enter the KGB in the manner or at the time claimed was primarily based on conflicting statements by NOSENKO as to when he entered the KGB (MVD). In 1962 NOSENKO said March 1953 and in 1965 NOSENKO again said March 1953, soon after the death of STALIN. SECRET 0001132 CROUP 1 Excluded from automatic! dorograding and declassification --- ## Page 148 In 1964, NOSENKO had given two dates in 1952 as his time of entry into the KGB in an effort not to admit that he had failed to graduate from the Institute of International Relations in 1949. The previous summary gave considerable weight to the statements of NOSENKO indicating that he did not enter the KGB (MVD) under what are considered normal KGB procedures. Proper allowances were not given for position of the father of NOSENKO, the Minister of Shipbuilding, and the influence of General KOBULOV. An analyst can either accept of reject the statement of NOSENKO that he entered the KGB (MVD) through the influence of General KOBULOV; but, if the statement is accepted, then the failure of NOSENKO to be required to follow normal KGB procedures should also be accepted. A Communist society or a Soviet Intelligence organization is not and could not be immune to influence by a high official. General KOBULOV as of mid-March 1953 was First Deputy to BERIYA, the Minister of the then MVD. The previous summary raises several points concerning the eligibility of NOSENKO for the KGB (MVD). It points out on page 67 that otber than bis undistinguished period of service with the Naval RU, he was no more eligible for a KGB appointment in 1953 than he was at the time of his previous rejection in 1950. This statement is not contro- vertible and is fully accepted with the qualification that in 1950 NOSENKO 0001133 2 SECRET --- ## Page 149 was not sponsored by any person of influence as was the case in 1953 with General KOBULOV who in mid-March 1953 was the First Deputy to BERIYA. The previous summary also states that according to KGB defectors familiar with the standards in force at the time, no candidate was accepted who had ever had tuberculosis. This is a flat statement which it is doubtful any defector or series of defectors could fully substantiate; namely, that it never happened. Until and unless it is medically proven that NOSENKO did not have tuberculosis, it is accepted that he did have tuberculosis in 1952 and was at a sanitarium . rest place in Kubinka. It is also accepted that he was an officer in the KGB after mid-March 1953. The influence of KOBULOV could undoubtedly have permitted NOSENKO to enter the KGB even though he previously had tuberculosis, but the flat statement that no candidate was accepted who had ever had tuberculosis is not and cannot be sufficiently substantiated. The previous summary contained a number of additional remarks and conclusions intended to show that NOSENKO was not eligible for and therefore could not have entered the KGB (MVD). Comments concerning these will be brief since there is considered to be no adequate basis at this time on which to contend that NOSENKO did not enter the KGB (MVD) as an officer in mid-March 1953. A comment was made that 0001134 3 SECRET --- ## Page 150 NOSENKO did not take a physical examination in connection with his processing for KGB entry, and that such a medical examination was routine and mandatory part of the processing of a KGB candidate. This statement makes no allowance for the influence of General ROBULOV; but, in addition, does not consider the fact that the Naval RU dossier on NOSENKO was available to the KGB (MVD). The previous summary also failed to note that the MVD would have had independent information in regard to NOSENKO since the MVD would have conducted any necessary inquiry in connection with the entry Of NOSENKO into the Naval RU. As of 1953, the MVD undoubtedly also had a dossier on the father of NOSENKO since this was still the STALIN era. The summary also states that NOSENKO did not complete the necessary lengthy Anketa before entry into the KGB (MVD) and did not speak to any personnel officers or visit the personnel office. It would seem that the influence of General KOBULOV could have permitted the elimination of most if not all of the necessity of complying with normal procedures, but NOSENKO has during interviews stated that he com- pleted the Anketa while sitting at his desk after entry into the KGB (MVD). Page 70 of the previous summary states that NOSENKO did not know the designation of his own Directorate either at the time he allegedly 6001135 4 SECRET --- ## Page 151 SECRET entered on duty or during his first year of KGB service. While NOSENKO has claimed that the designation of his Directorate at the time he entered the KGB (MVD) in mid-March 1953 was the Second Chief Directorate and that it subsequently was redesignated the First Chief Directorate, DERYABIN has stated this reversal of designations occurred in March 1953. STALIN died in early March 1953 and that same month the MVD and the MGB were merged under the name MVD with BERIYA as Minister. BERIYA held this position until his arrest in early June 1953. BERIYA was succeeded by KRUGLOV, who held office for less than a year. Yuriy RASTVOROV was recently queried concerning the date of the reversal of the designation of the FCD and SCD and places it as the end of April or early May 1953. GOLITSYN has indicated that the change occurred "soon after the advent of BERIYA as head of the MVD in April 1953. " In the light of our inability to fix the effective date of the reversal of the designations of the SCD and the FCD, it is unreasonable to impugn NOSENKO on his statement as to the designation of his Directorate at the time of his entry into the KGB (MVD). There is a disagreement between NOSENKO and others as to who was responsible for the reversal of designations of the FCD and the SCD. NOSENKO is of the opinion that it occurred under KRUGLOV, which is 5 0001136 SECRET --- ## Page 152 in conflict with the statements of DERYABIN, RASTVOROV and GOLITSYN, all of whom maintain that BERIYA was responsible for the changes. As for the issue of who was responsible for the reversal of designations, it would appear that NOSENKO is in error. However, the fact that he was a new junior officer and that this was a period of upheaval in the KGB (MVD) effectively eliminates any significance in this issue. NOSENKO is criticized in the previous summary for not knowing the location of the Chief Directorate of the Militia or the history of the KI (Committee of Information). NOSENKO has stated that he had no contacts with either office during 1953-1955 and there is no adequate reason to disbelieve this statement. He is not aware of when the KI ceased to exist (1951 given in the summary, but other information indicates the KI continued to exist in a nominal capacity until the mid-1950's), but care should be used in stating what NOSENKO should know if he held a certain position. Readers of this summary may wish to reflect on their own memory concerning the location and their knowledge of Agency facilities at any given period of time or when Agency components or related organizations were organized or ceased to exist. 6 0001137 SECRET --- ## Page 153 The point has also been made that any career of NOSENKO in the KGB should have ended or he should have at least encountered difficulty when his benefactor General KOBULOV, together with the brother of General KOBULOV, was arrested with the BERIYA group in early June 1953. NOSENKO has during current interviews stated that he encountered no difficulties but is aware that the KOBULOV connection was discussed by an officer from the Personnel Directory with an official of the First Department. Under other circumstances NOSENKO would very possibly have encountered difficulty; but, it should be noted that the father of NOSENKO retained his position, that NOSENKO only met General KOBULOV through his father, and that NOSENKO has stated that although his father knew General KOBULOV, his father could in no way be considered a member of the BERIYA group. Üu1138 SECRET --- ## Page 154 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 155 14-00000 SECRET C. NOSENKO DID NOT SERVE IN THE AMERICAN EMBASSY SECTION THROUGHOUT THE 1953 -1955 PERIOD AS HE CLAIMED 0001139 SECRET --- ## Page 156 SEORE! C. NOSENKO did not serve in the American Embassy Section throughout the 1953 - 1955 period as he claimed. (Previous conclusion) The above is conclusion "C" in the previous summary. The conclusion in this summary is that NOSENKO was an officer of the First Section (American Embassy Section), First Department, from mid-March 1953 to late May 1955 when he was transferred to the Seventh Department, SCD. This period of time has been covered in detail with NOSENKO during current interviews. The conclusion is that NOSENKO was an officer in the First Section but was not a very effective officer and that both his work and behavior were decidedly influenced by the fact that he was the son of the Minister of Shipbuilding. NOSENKO is reluctant to admit that he was other than slightly lackadaisical in his work during this period of time, but is not hesitant to admit that his personal be- havior was such as to cause him to be removed as Secretary to the Komsomol unit in 1954 and to cause an unsatisfactory "characterization" SECRET Excludad frun automatich duregrading and Gediaositication 6001140 --- ## Page 157 it in in in a to be prepared in early 1955 which necessitated a decision as to whether he would be fired from the KGB or transferred to some other component. The influence of his family is quite apparent in the above since his father was advised of his difficulties in 1954 by an official of the KGB and his mother interceded on his behalf in 1955 with the Chief of SCD. The result in 1955 was that NOSENKO was transferred to the Seventh Department and not fired from the KGB. The question has been raised as to how NOSENKO could remain in the KGB when after 1954 he was not a member of the Komsomol and was not eligible to become a candidate for the Communist Party. This is a valid question but a plausible explanation is again the fact that he was the son of the then Minister of Shipbuilding. NOSENKO has stated during previous and current interviews that following his entry into the KGB and until circa mid-1954 he was respon- sible for work against American correspondents in Moscow. He has not claimed that he had any successes and has stated that the work with news - paper correspondents already recruited was being handled by other officers. NOSENKO has explained that during this time he was a "new officer," indicating he could hardly have been expected to act as an experienced officer. His knowledge of correspondents in Moscow during this period of time, together with his knowledge of other KGB officers and his 2 6001141 SECRET --- ## Page 158 information concerning his own agents is believed of sufficient weight to accept the statement of NOSENKO that work against American cor - respondents was his assignment from mid-March 1953 to mid-1954. From circa mid-1954 until his transfer to the Seventh Depart- ment in late May 1955, NOSENKO claims and has claimed he was an officer of the First Section with the responsibility of work against the Military Attaches (Army) at the United States Embassy in Moscow. It is considered, based on his knowledge of the various Military Attache personnel and other collateral information furnished by NOSENKO, that NOSENKO was an officer of the First Section during the mid-1954 - late May 1955 period of time, that his primary work was against members of the Office of the Military Attache, but that the quality of his work undoubtedly left much to be desired. In circa mid-1954, NOSENKO was removed as Secretary of the Komsomol unit and by early 1955 his performance was such that at least certain officials in the First Department desired his removal from the First Department, if not the KGB. Under these circumstances, NOSENKO could be criticized as having been a very poor if not undesirable KGB officer, but his knowledge of the First Section during this period of time and his knowledge of the members of the Office of 3 SECRET 6001142 --- ## Page 159 SECRET the Military Attache supports the claim of NOSENKO that be was an officer of the First Section with the indicated assignment as related by him. NOSENKO has stated that the work against the Military Attaches was not primarily directed toward development of recruitment possibilities, but was directed toward control of the Military Attaches . on trips in order to prevent observation of sensitive areas, sensitive sites or sensitive activities in the USSR. This attitude by the KGB would appear to be completely plausible and NOSENKO noted as exceptional in this regard the recruitment attempt against Captain Walter MULE. NOSENKO explained this exception as retaliation for approaches to Soviets in the United States in that period. NOSENKO has been criticized because he did not know all the details concerning the Military Attaches which it was considered he should have known if he had the specific responsibility for work against the Military Attaches during the indicated period of time. It is submitted that this may be evidence of his failure to satisfactorily fulfill his 6001143 SECRET --- ## Page 160 assigned junctions, mi muires to ajiwance for the uncertair persoi staius d NOSENIO Whose actua: inture in the KGB was in jeopardy NOSENKO RaS prEVIously indicated and still indicates à definite lach of incwledge concerning his assigned targets during approximately March - May 1955. This, according to NOSINKO, was when an ur- satisfactory "characterization" was beirg prepared on NOSENKO, a decision was being made on his case, and a period of time in waich he veri on a "big druak" which culminated in his spending about 40 days made: suspiral care because of the possibility of recurrence i his previous miberculosis. Pages 84 - 87 of the previous summary suggeat thai NOSENNO had not fumished sificient details about his alleged agent detwo.. fur we ajalast the Military Attaches. It is considered that NOCENC in curreni incerviews has uinished adequae acceptable deta.s, zad as an example iurnisaed spicific mormation concerning "VOLODiNA ral JAkeli" pig- 85) "Wed appear that inere was 10 tai by NOSadio i Withaoi information concaraing wese individuals, buc 0001144 5 --- ## Page 161 The effectiveness or non-effectiveness of NOSENKO during his assignment to the First Section, First Department, from mid-March 1953 to late May 1955 can have little pertinency in the question of the bona fides of NOSENKO if it is accepted that he actually was an officer in the First Section during this period of time. It is felt that information furnished by NOSENKO in current interviews and in previous interviews is of sufficient scope and detail that his claimed service as an officer in the First Section during this period of time is completely acceptable. 0001145 6 SECRET --- ## Page 162 0001146 --- ## Page 163 14-00000 SECRET D. DURING THE PERIOD 1955 - 1960, HE WAS NEITHER A SENIOR CASE OFFICER IN, NOR DEPUTY CHIEF OF, THE SEVENTH DEPARTMENT AMERICAN-BRITISH COMMONWEALTH SECTION 0001147 SECRET CROUP 1 Excluca: ton cutomatic diagrading and racines Acation --- ## Page 164 •.. SECRET D. During the period of 1955 - 1960, NOSENKO was neither a senior case officer in, nor Deputy Chief of, the Seventh Department, American-British Commonwealth Section. (Previous conclusion) The above is conclusion "D" in the previous summary. The current conclusion is that NOSENKO was an officer in the Seventh Department, SCD, from late May 1955 to December 1959 and was Deputy Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section, Seventh Department from 1958 to December 1959. During current interviews, NOSENKO has furnished extensive information concerning his own activities in the Seventh Department during the 1955-1959 period. Interviews of persons who were the subject. of KGB interest collaterally confirm that NOSENKO was personally in- volved in certain claimed activities during 1955 to December 1959. These activities include among others the recruitment of Richard BURGI. in June 1956, contact with Sir Allen LANE)and Arthur BIRSE) in the summer of 1957, the recruitment of (Gisella HARRIS) in 1958, the re- cruitment of George DREW) in the spring of 1959, the recruitment of 0001148 SECRET comparadian did Ceconomitation --- ## Page 165 14-00000 SECRET William Stanley WILBY) in June 1959, the recruitment of David TAYLOR in the summer of 1959, the recruitment of Gerard MERTENS in July - August 1959, and the recruitment of Arsene FRIPPEL in 1959. The foregoing is not a complete list of all cases in which NOSENKO claims personal involvement, but is representative of cases in which his alleged participation has been confirmed by interviews with the individual who was the KGB target. Sir Allez LANE, Arthur BIRSE, William Stanley WILBY) and David TAYLOR were British citizens and the other above-named indi- viduals were United States citizens. This would seem to substantiate the claim of NOSENKO that during 1955 - December 1959 he was an officer engaged in KGB operations against American-British Common- wealth tourists in the USSR. In addition, NOSENKO has furnished specific information about an operation against Martin MALIA, an American tourist who was in the Soviet Union from approximately September 1955 to December 1955. MALIA)has not been interviewed and will not be interviewed, so at this time no particular 1955 case in which NOSENKO claims involvement or personal knowledge has been substantiated by interview of the individual involved. 0001149 2 --- ## Page 166 NOSENKO has furnished information on the travel of certain United States Government officials, including Congressional represent- atives to the USSR in 1955 - 1956; and the trip of Supreme Court Justice William O. DOUGLAS in 1955 which, when considered with the previously mentioned specifics, adequately substantiate his claimed service in the Seventh Department and work against American-British Commonwealth tourists during the late May 1955 - December 1959 period. NOSENKO has stressed that when he transferred to the Seventh Department, the Tourist Section had just been established and an agent network was not available for operations against American and British tourists. This seems quite logical since the influx of tourists into the USSR was just in, a formative stage. NOSENKO has spoken in detail about an agent network he de- veloped after 1955 which primarily consisted of Intourist personnel and two homosexual agents, "SHMELEV" and "GRIGORIY" (KGB code names), whose extensive use in KGB operations has been confirmed by interviews with individuals who were the subject of homosexual com- promise operations. The previous summary contained remarks on pages 101 - 150 in regard to the claimed 1955 - 1959 Seventh Department service of 0001150 NOSENKO. To comment on all the aspects mentioned in those fifty 3 --- ## Page 167 SECRET pages would be repetitious and in many instances superfluous. It is considered that even if the statements were accepted in toto, there would still not be an adequate basis for a conclusion that NOSENKO was not an officer in the claimed positions in the Seventh Department during the period of late May 1955 - December 1959. Nor is it con- ceded that, if all the sub-conclusions and the interpretationg of various areas of information were accepted without qualification, there is any evidence that NOSENKO was dispatched by the KGB. However, there are certain assumptions and interpretations which appeared in the previous summary which are particularly worthy of comment and which are considered erroneous or require additional clarification. On page 145 it is stated that the evidence suggests that NOSENKO was an English-speaking specialist in sexual entrapment, not a counter- intelligence officer responsible for the identification of foreign agents among tourists or for the development, recruitment, and exploitation of agents for the KGB. The Second Chief Directorate, KGB, and the MVD have used homosexual and heterosexual compromise in numerous known (and presumably unknown) successful recruitments and recruit- ment attempts. This activity has not been limited to the Seventh Depart- ment, SCD; and the innuendo that NOSENKO was "only an English- speaking specialist in sexual entrapment"' and not a KGB orderlthen SECRET --- ## Page 168 14-00000 SECREI considered with the detailed information NOSENKO has provided on Seventh Department personnel, activities, procedures, and topics of a similar nature is not considered to have any foundation in fact. Page 145 of the above summary lists eleven operations which were Seventh Department cases prior to 1960 and which were included in the notes furnished to CIA in 1964 by NOSENKO. The named operations were those against Bernard PECHTER, Patrick PRESSMAN, John RUFE, Gerald SEVERN, Sofia SHATIAUER, (fnu) KARLOV, Norman FISK,; Ralph MATLAW, Marvin KANTOR, Michael GINSBURG, and William (TARASKA. The criticism made in regard to the above eleven cases was that NOSENKO could not describe the individual operations other than to say that he had recorded the name of the target and such details as he could acquire when he reviewed the activities of the Seventh Depart ment in 1962 following his return from the First Department. The notes brought out by NOSENKO are considered in another section of this summary, but it should be noted here that a full review of all of the notes of NOSENKO currently available indicates that his statements as to how and why he obtained the information in the notes are completely plausible. A detailed explanation of the notes furnished by NOSENKO would almost necessitate a separate listing of the approxi- mately 150 cases or names mentioned in the notes. 0001152 5 SECRET --- ## Page 169 During current interviews, NOSENKO furnished specific information on certain of the above eleven cases, including William' (TARASKA, Bernard PECHTER, Michael GINSBURG and John RUFE, It should also be noted that certain of the cases such as Marvin KANTOR and William TARASKA were cases in which the tourist was visiting relatives in the Soviet Union and that NOSENKO has given a satisfactory explanation of how he learned of the KANTOR case. NOSENKO has, in discussing his duties as Deputy Chief of the American-British 'Common- wealth Section, also explained that if a tourist indicated that he intended to visit relatives in the USSR, the case automatically was assigned to a group of officers in the Section who reported directly to the Chief of Section and were, not under the supervision of NOSENKO. NOSENKO has stated that he noted the names of three of the individuals when retiring the files of "GRIGORIY" and "SHMELEV, " two homosexual agents of NOSENKO previously mentioned. NOSENKO has explained that "SHMELEV" and "GRIGORIY" had the assignment of identifying American travelers with homosexual tendencies, that they had contact with numerous Americans, and that they had homosexual activity with individuals on whom they reported but on whom no overt action was taken by the Seventh Department. In some cases the individual 6001153 6 SECRET --- ## Page 170 SECRET was not considered a worthwhile target and in others the information was just maintained for possible use at a later date if the individual returned to the USSR. NOSENKO has also explained how he learned of the Patrick: PRESSMAN and Gerald SEVERN cases; and, the listing of the Sofia SHATTAUER case in connection with the 1955 - 1959 period is in com- plete error since page 427 of the previous summary contains information from NOSENKO on her recruitment in 1962. During current interviews the notes which NOSENKO brought out in 1964 have been discussed in detail with NOSENKO. He has given a detailed explanation of the material which he brought out and his explanation of all aspects is very convincing. The previous summary (page 144) suggested that the involvement of NOSENKO in certain cases being handled by other Sections in the Seventh Department or by the KGB Directorate of Moscow was unusual. An examination of the cited cases does not indicate that his participation was unusual, but rather that his explanation of why he was involved is logical and normal. No consideration was previously given to the English language capability of NOSENKO or the fact that his own homosexual agents were used in two of the four cited cases. The summary also noted that there was a question concerning whether Gisella HARRIS)was necessarily a Seventh Department case. 0001154 7 REPRET --- ## Page 171 14-00000 SECRET ( • This question seems quite superfluous since HARRIS was in the USSR on a tourist visa and "real" tourists are the responsibility of the Seventh Department. Departmental responsibility within the SCD for an indi- vidual traveling in the USSR is decided on the basis of how the individual is traveling; i. e., whether on a tourist visa, as a member of a delegation, as the invitee of an organization in the USSR, as a former diplomat stationed in Moscow, as a diplomat not previously stationed in Moscow, as a member of the Cultural Exchange program, as a student attending. a university in the USSR, etc. There are also various other factors which affect the determination of which Department or organizational component of the SCD has the responsibility for a tourist case. These factors include whether the individual is already suspected of foreign intelligence connections and whether the individual is a businessman. In addition, certain actual tourists in the USSR may never become the responsibility of the SCD if the individual is of specific interest to the FCD. On pages 148 - 149, NOSENKO is criticized for not knowing at least some of the substance of the information furnished by George BLAKE in regard to the CIA-MI-6 program of utilizing tourist agents in the USSR. This criticism completely ignored the fact that NOSENKO made several references in 1962 to the KGB having such information 0001155 8 SECRET --- ## Page 172 SECRET although he did then and still suspects that William VASSALI was the source. The references by NOSENKO to the KGB having such infor - mation were not developed in 1962 or later interrogations, and it was not until current interviews that it was established that NOSENKO had actually seen excerpts of information passed by George BLAKE. According to NOSENKO, the information which was obviously only partial was furnished to the FCD by the SCD and could only have come from an agent. The previous summary (page 149) also notes that in 1961 CIA acquired a lengthy Top Secret study on the subject of the use of tourists by American Intelligence for espionage and operational support in the Soviet Union (document was furnished by GOLITSYN following his de- fection in December 1961). It was noted that the summary contained references to certain 1958 - 1959 tourists whom the KGB counter- intelligence identified as American agents and noted that NOSENKO claimed he was Deputy Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section in this period of time and that he claimed the KGB identified no American Intelligence agents during this period of time. What later is described as a claim by NOSENKO is neither an accurate reflection of what NOSENKO said prior to 1967 or has said since 1967. 0001156 9 SECRET --- ## Page 173 SECREA NOSENKO has never claimed to know all activities against American travelers in the Soviet Union during 1958 - 1959. Many of these travelers would have been the responsibility of a section in the Seventh Department, other than the American-British Common- wealth Section, or another Department in the SCD. NOSENKO was quite aware that certain of the American tourists in 1958 - 1959 were acting suspiciously from a KGB point of view. NOSENKO has stated he was aware that a document which the Seventh Department had prepared and furnished to the ECD in an effort to obtain further assistance from the FCD in the work against tourists had been compromised by GOLITSYN. NOSENKO stated he was not in the Seventh Department when the document was prepared and did not review the document until after the defection of GOLITSYN and follow ing advice from the FCD to the Seventh Department, SCD, that the document had been compromised. The document furnished by GOLITSYN has never been reviewed with NOSENKO to determine if it contained additional information not in the document which he was aware had been prepared by the Seventh Department for the ECD. NOSENKO has been impugned on his apparent unfamiliarity with a number of cases cited as examples in the document furnished by GOLITSYN. In current interviews, however, the descriptioUt NOSENKO 10 SERRET --- ## Page 174 14-00000 concerning the distributon di resporsibilities wiin de SCD io. Various categories O fORCiZA ViSORS tO tU USSR provides a logical expiminion foi his mammit. Previous pioblems in is regard a2306i to have stemmed fion a misconceptica li tie meaning oi tae term "tourist"' as üsed by the KC3. Tais gecerai term has a spacific meaning in tre Second Guidi Directorate; namely, a "tourist"' is a ioreigner travalling io the USSR on a tourist visa. Such a person was the responsibuity oi the Iourist Section of lae Seventh Depazi- mazi. A large number of tavelers to the USSri, inciuding bismess- men, pessons travelling on invitation of a Sovict Organization, students attending a university, eic., ure qui tourisis in the KGS concept and would not be ine responsibility of the Tourist Section of the Seventa Départment. The oy unresoived Frobiem considered di any sagnificance ¡a regara to the 1955 - 1959 pariod is ze account by NOSENKO of ica prasence of American citizen Joan SHUSIN in tse USSR as a tourist in the late 1950's. Tae previous summaly ported out that, sirce cohn SauBldid not have a valid Juited States passport between 1940 anà June 1951, it was imjossible loi him io have been a tourist undei true name in the USSR and, therefore, a taiget of the Seventa Depari- mont, as NOSTikO cians. Alaougo saveral avenues oi possisty 0001158 Fruitil investigation have not yet been illy explored, there is to 11 20099 --- ## Page 175 assurance that this anomaly will ever be explained. All tat justifiably can be said ai the preser ime is that, even if the story Oí NOSENKO is inaccurate, there is no evidential reason way such inaccuracy should be interpreted as indicative of deception or dispatch, or for that matter as indicative that he was not Deputy Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section of te Seventic Department in 1958 - 1959; neither would such an inaccuracy reflect on his claimed service in 1962 - 1963 in the Seventh Department. G001159 12 --- ## Page 176 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 177 14-00000 SECRET E.. NOSENKO WAS NEITHER DEPUTY CHIEF OF THE AMERICAN EMBASSY SECTION NOR A SENIOR OFFICER OR SUPERVISOR IN THE SECTION DURING THE PERIOD 1961 - 1962 (sic) 0001160 SECRET GROUP 1 seven rains and --- ## Page 178 SECRET E: NOSENKO was neithor Deputy Chief of the American Embassy Section nor a senior officer or supervisor in the Section during the period of 1961 - 1962 (sic). (Previous conclusion) It is the conclusion of this summary that NOSENKO held the position of Deputy Chief, First Section (American Embassy Section), SCD, from January 1960 - December 1961. The claim of NOSENKO that he held the above position in 1960 - 1961 has been the most difficult claimed position of NOSENKO to satisfactorily resolve and accept. Acceptance or nonacceptance of his claim to have held this particular position is a critical factor in a decision as to whether the remainder of his claimed KGS career is valid. It is believed reasonable to presume that if NOSENKO was Deputy Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section, Sevenua Department, prior to December 1959 in the absence of any indication that he was demoted, he should have been ai least a Deputy Chief oi Section during 1960 - 1961. Position in the SCD, KG3, and throughout the KGB is important from a monetary point of view as well as a prestige point of view. I 0001161 --- ## Page 179 NOSENKO was only in the First Section as a Senior Case Officer, in 1960 - 1961, this would have been a demotion in position with resultant loss of both money and prestige. Foi this reason alone, his failure to have held the position of Deputy Caies in 1960 - 1961 would raise con- siderable doubt as to whether he held his claimed position prior to 1960, as well as whether he held his claimed positions in 1962 - 1963. It is apparent that the knowledge of NOSENKO concerning all aspects of activity in the First Section, First Department, during 1960 - 1961 is incomplete when judged by what are considered the normai responsibilities of a Deputy Chiei in CIA. During current interviews, an effort was made to determine what the responsibilities of NCS ENKO actually were in 1960 - 1961 and whether his statements in this area were impossible or could be accepted as noi negating his claim to have been Deputy Chief, First Sectio. According to NOSENKO, in the early 1960's there were only approximately fifteen Deputy Chiefs of Section in the entire SCD and in certain departments none of the sections had a Deputy Chief of Section. in addition, transíer of a Deputy Chief of Section was not always followed by a repiacement in kind, according to NOSENKO who stated that he was not replaced by another Deputy Chief when he transferred to the First Section, First Department. 0001162 2 430201 --- ## Page 180 According to NOSENKO, inere was not a job description for a Deputy Chief o Section and te dusies of the particular Deputy Chief were in actuality whai the Chie of Department and Crief of Section decided would be his assigned duties. The previous summary drew attention to an apparent conflict between early statements of NOSENKO that he replaced no one when he entered on duty in the First Section, First Department, and his subseguent claim that he replaced Mikhail BAKEVALOV as Deputy Chief in the First Section. Along with this he had first credited KOVSHUK and various other officers in the Section with previous responsibility for cerain matters which were assigned to him upon his arrival there, then later stated that BAKHVALOV had been responsible for these matters. The previous summary noted that interrogation had never resolved these contradictions. In the light of the present clearer picture of the nature of a Deputy Chief of Section, the statements of NÖSENKO on BAKHVALOV and on the issue of who he, NOSENKO, did or did not replace are not contradictory. There is no reason to question that BAKHVALOV, with whom NOSENKO, incidentally, did not overlay, was a Deputy Chiei of Section in the First Section before NOSENKO, and thai he was respon- sible for certain areas which latei iell to NOSENKO. On the oiner 0001163 3 --- ## Page 181 hand, according to NOSENKO, the principal reason for his being assigned to the First Section was to concentraie on a new area of emphasis (code clerks). There could of course have been no specific predecessor for a substantively new area. Therefore, in one sense BAKHVALOV was the predecessor of NOSENKO and in another sense he was not. The interpretation of the various statements of NOSINKO on this issue as being in conflict appears to be the result of coniusion on this point by all concerned. According to NOSENKO, at the time of his transier to the First Section, First Department, in early 1960, he had not been told and for a short period thereafter was not told what his actual duties would be. KOVSHUK, Chief of the First Section, wanted to assign NOSENKO to supervise the work against Service Attaches at the United States Embassy. NOSENKO felt that the proposed assignment by KOVSHUK was intended to keep NOSENKO occupied with nonproductive work since KGB policy for work against the Service Attaches was primarily one of control on trips and not active work towards possible recruitment. After a short period of time, NOSENKO was iniormed by GRIBANOV that he, NOSENKO, had been transferred to supervise the work agains: code cleris (also code machine mechanios) ai the United States Embassy. GRIBANOV defined this work as being of the greatest 0001164 8272. --- ## Page 182 importance, and the recruitment of code clerks as a priority aim of the KGB. KLYPIN, who was Chief of the First Department, later re- peated the above and a group consisting of NOSENKO, Gennadiy I. GRYAZNOV and Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV was formed with NOSENKO responsible for supervision of the work. GRYAZNOV and KOSOLAPOV were not new KGB officers, but instead were experienced officers although both as Senior Case Officers were of lesser rank than NOSENKO. NOSENKO does not claim that he had to train either officer or to minutely scrutinize every action or proposed action of GRYAZNOV and KOSOLAPOV. NOSENKO does claim he was responsible for supervision over their work. According to NOSENKO, GRIBANOV emphasized that work against code clerks was to be his primary work in the First Section and that it would take precedence over any other activity. Other than work against code clerks, NOSENKO has generally defined his resyon- sibilities as follows: (a) Responsibility for file of (work against) John ABIDIAN, Security Officer at United States Embassy• (b) Responsibility for preliminary review of re- poris irom OTU (KGB technical unit) of "take" from microphones in the United States Embassy. 6001165 5 --- ## Page 183 (c) Responsibility for maintenance of the physical security file on the United States Embassy. (d) Acting in place of Vladislav KOVSHUK, Chief, First Section, when KOVSHUK was absent. As can be seen from the above, the responsibilities of NOSENKO, by his definition, which are borne out by specific information furnished by NOSENKO, would not coincide with the normal responsibilities of a Deputy Chief of Branch or Section in CIA. An analyst can either accept or reject the theory that there is necessarily an equation between the responsibilities of a Deputy Chief in CIA and the KGB, but il the analyst accepts the theory, he must offer some supporting evidence on this point. Pages 151 - 261 of the previous summary contained comments and conclusions and sub-conclusions in regard to the claimed service. of NOSENKO as Deputy Chief of Firsi Section, First Department, 1960 - 1961. The previous primary conclusion was that he was neither Deputy Chief of the First (American Embassy) Section nor a supervisor in that section. The conclusion of this summary is that he was Deputy Chief and had supervisory responsibilities for work against code cierks. The matter of the responsibility of NOSENKO for work against code clerks will be considered later. Comments will first be made on the respon- sibilities listed in (a) - (d) above. 0001166 6 9E0G27 --- ## Page 184 SCUL Pages 205 - 222 of the previous summary contain a detailed basis for the previous conclusion that NOSENKO was not the KG3 case officer for john ABIDIAN. The current conclusion is that he was the responsible case officer for ABIDIAN. Whether or not his work against ABIDIAN compared favorably with what is considered to be the MO of a responsible CIA case officer is immaterial; what is material is whether NOSENKO reasonably fulfilled the requirements of the KGB for work against the particular target, John ABIDIAN. It is felt that the answer to this is that NOSENKO did. According to NOSENKO, the work against ABIDIAN was in the direction of determining if ABIDIAN would lead the KGB to "another POPOV, " and no consideration was given to active agent work against ABIDIAN for possible recruitment. This explanation by NOSENKO appears reasonable and logical and his knowledge of ABIDIAN and his description of his work against ABIDIAN should be considered only within that framework. Admittedly NOSENKO was unaware of a considerable amount of details regarding the background of ABIDIAN, but on the other hand it the statements of NOSENKO are accepted that the only aim of the KGB was to see if coverage of ABIDiAN would lead to "another POPOV, " it follows that such personalia information on ABIDIAN would have had 0001167 7 --- ## Page 185 little material value for the SCD. The FCD had advised the SCD prior to the arrival of ABIDIAN in the USSR that ABIDIAN was considered to be "American Intelligence, " and in addition ABIDIAN assumed the Security Officer position formerly held by Russell A. LANCELLE, who was known by the KGB to be CIA. No investigation by the SCD was necessary to determine if ABIDIAN was "American Intelligence" or not. The previous summary, pages 213 - 216, contains som e quite specific statements relative to ABIDIAN and a Soviet maid, a KGB operational contact according to NOSENKO, which are erroneous. This invalidates one of the bases for the previous conclusion that NOSENKO was not the responsible case officer for ABIDIAN. NOSENKO had previously stated that in circa October 1960 he prepared an operational plan on ABIDIAN which included continuation of the placing of Metka on the clothing and eifects of ABIDIAN by his maid who is mentioned above, Tatyana FEDOROVICH. The statement is made in the summary that this could not be true because FEDOROVICH did not work part time for ABIDIAN until at least July 1961. ABIDIAN. has recently been reinterviewed concerning the above and the results. invalidate the previous conciusion that FEDOROVICH could nui have treated the clothing and effecis of ABIDIAN with Metka prio: 10 July 196i. C001168 8 --- ## Page 186 ABIDIAN has now stated that he arrived in Moscow in March 1960 with the intention that he would not employ a Soviet maid. Approxi- mately three months later his close association began with Myra KEVIVER, a Department of State employee; this association continued until she left Moscow in mid-1961. KEMMER had Tatyana FEDOROVICH as a maid and through mutual agreement with KEMMER, FEDOROVICH became the pari-time maid for ABIDIAN beginning sometime in the fall of 1960. From that time on FEDOROVICH, according to ABIDIAN, had uncontrolled access to his living quarters since she had a key to permit entry for cleaning purposes. ABIDIAN did not mail any operational letters within the Soviet Union until after March 1961 and therefore in view of the above, there is do reason to contradict the statement of NOSINO that the three mical ? operational letters intercepted by the KGB and mailed by ABIDIAN all showed evidence of Metka. It is interesting to note that NOSENKO in June 1962 warned CIA about the KGB use of Metka for spotting internal letter mailings by United States Embassy personnel. ABIDIAN, according to NOSENKO, was the subject of a 24-hour surveillance with the Seventh Directorate assigning a specific surveillance brigade to cover ABIDIAN. The actual surveillance of ABIDIAN was the responsibility of the Seventh Directorate which submitted reports to the 0001169 --- ## Page 187 800051 First Section, First Department. NOSENKO, as the responsible case officer for ABIDIAN, was expected io review these reports and give any appropriate guidance or direction to the Seventh Directorate, but under the KGB organization he would not participate in the surveillance activities of the Seventh Directorate. NOSENKO stated that had sur- veillance or agent information disclosed any personal weaknesses of ABIDIAN, the KGB would have attempted to exploit them. No personal weaknesses were disclosed, according to NOSENKO, and the pattern of coverage to see if ABIDIAN would lead the KGB to "another POPOV! remained unchanged. Pages 210 - 212 of the previous summary notes that NOSENKO was unaware of countries visited by. ABIDIAN during trips ouiside the USSR and that no effort was made by NOSENKO through the FCD to find out such information. According to the previous summary, NOSENKO stated that the FCD "would not accept"' such a request for "operationai action against an American diplomat coming from Moscow. " The surveillance which would have been required on the part of the ECD to achieve any sort of reasonable coverage of ABIDIAN abroad would certainly have placed a severe burden on the FCD. Further, NOSENKO contends that the results which might reasonably be expected would be of little or no practical value to the SCD. 6001170 10 --- ## Page 188 witnes Pages 216 - 221 of the previous summary contain a summary on the matter of the Pushiin Street deaddrop site which John ABIDIAN visited on 30 December 1961. It should be noted that a current review of the 1964 - 196ó interrogations of NOSENKO on this matter indicates they were unable to clarily the matter and dia much to confuse the issue. Current interviews, as indicated above, have not fully resolved the problems, but have assisted in at least minimizing the areas of conflict or confusion. It is apparent that NOSENKO was not in the First Section, First Department, for any material period of time after 30 December 1901. It is also clear that he either read the surveillance report on the visit of ABIDIAN to the Pushkin Street deaddrop site or was fully briefed on the details of the visit. NOSENKO insists that he read the surveillance report at the time or shortly after the event. There is no reason to question his assertion that he read the report since his accurate knowledge of the route of ABIDIAN and his actions in connection with the visit support this claim. However, his consistent inability on his own to approximate the date of the visit or relateit to his change of assignments raises a question regarding when he actually read the report. NOSENKO claims that the visit of ABIDIAN to the Pushkin Street deaddrop area ledto the KGB setting uy a stationary surveillance posi 0001171 --- ## Page 189 near the site which was maintained for three months and that he was informed on a daily basis of the results of this stake out (always negative). To take this statement literally would raisa further problem since, in addition to his transfer from the First Department to the Seventh Department as of early January 1962, NOSENKO went to Geneva in mid-March 1962. It is conceivable that, as he himself now maintains, he was kept advised of developments or nondevelopments following the visit of ABIDIAN to the Pushkin Street building by Veniamin KOZLOV, a Chief of Department in the Seventh Directorate who had been known to NOSENKO since 1953, or Vladislav KOVSHUK or Gennadiy GRYAZNOV, Chief and Deputy Chief respectively of the First Section, First Depart- ment.. Even so, however, his failure to call our attention to this matter in June 1962 would seem to require explanation, especially in view of the fact that he did warn us about the danger of operational letter mail- ings by ABIDIAN -- a warning which would aypear clearly to have been derived from KGB coverage of the activities of ABIDIAN in the spring- summer of 1961. It is to be noted that during the June 1962 meetings NOSENKO was not specifically asked for any additional information regarding any known or suspected intelligence activities of ABIDIAN. Beyond 0001172 12 ... --- ## Page 190 this, NOSENKO himself has stated thai it did not occur to him to tell us because the stake out had long since been dropped, it had revealed nothing suspicious on the part of ABIDIAN or anyone else, and therefore he had regarded it as insignificant. This is not implausible. Another possible explanation, however, derived from the already noted inability of NOSENKO to pin down a date for the visit, is that he learned of the stationary surveillance post if not of the visit itself after his meetings with us in June 1962. It should be noted in this context that with the public exposure of the PENKOVSKIY case in the fall of 1962, the Pushkin Street deaddrop undoubtedly became the subject of widespread interest within the KGB. That NOSENKO is at a minimum still confused about the visit OÍ ABIDIAN to the Pushkin Street deaddrop and its consequences is clear from the record. While it is entirely possible that NOSENKO has con- sciously exaggerated his involvement with the visit and its aftermati, it is also possible that the evident distortions of his accounts of the affair derive from honest confusion. Current interviews and a check of the tapes of previous inter- views leave no doubt that NOSENKO was aware of the visits of ABIDiAN to the uppei Gorkiy Sireei area ciica March 1961. These visits by ABIDIAN were for cover purposes and preceded his start of operational 0001173 13 --- ## Page 191 SEUREI letter mailing. NOSENKO consistently relates, and has furnished drawings which substantiate, thai visits of ABIDIAN to a commission shop, a next-door art shop, and a local post office in the area were known to and considered suspicious by the KGB. The entrarce to the art shop, according to NOSENKO, was so situated as to be an ideal place for picking up or placing a deaddrop, and a mobile surveillance was placed on the art shop for a period of time following the visit of ABIDIAN. Official records confirm the visits of ABIDIAN at the time and to the buildings described by NOSENKO. Pages 216 - 220 of the previous summary contain no reíerence to the specific statements of NOSENKO relative to KGB interest in the visits of ABIDIAN to the upper Gorkiy Street area. It is also clear from a review of certain transcripts of previous interrogations that no differentiation was made concerning his statements relative to KGB coverage of the activities of ABIDIAN in the upper Gorkiy Street area. circa March 1961 and his statements concerning his knowledge of the Pushkin Street deaddrop site after the visit of ABIDIAN to that site (30 December 1961). It is impossible at this time to state that a detailed debriefing Of NOSENKO concerning ABIDIAN prior to hostile interrogation wouid have permitted the clarification of all issues inciuding ihe abova, but 14 6001174 ASCRET --- ## Page 192 14-00000 there is no doubt that the hostile interrogation has confused matters to the point where compiete clarification appears impossible. In any event, one thing is clear - since he may well have transferred out of the First Section, First Dapartment, by 31 December 1961 and most certainly hac transferred by early. January 1962, the faci that NOSENKO has supplied confused information regarding the Pushkin Street aifair cannot be used to impugn his claim to having been case office for ABIDIAN from early 1960 until late 1901. Furthermore, the fact that NOSENKO is not able to properly date the visit of ABIDIAN to Pushkin Street, is in no way indicative of KGB dispatch. If dispatched, NOSENKO presumably would have had the date right. In regard to (b), the responsibility of NOSINKO for preliminary re- view of reports from OTU (Technical Unit of KGBj of "take" from micro- phones in the United States Embassy, the previous conclusion was that his claim that he personally reviewed the KGB monitoring reports was not sustained. It is not felt that the previous conclusion made sufficient allow- ance for the explanation of NOSENKO of what the responsibility actually entailed. Information from microphones in the United States Embassy, according to NOSENKO, was handled very specially. Telephone inter- cepts were given to a designated office: fo: distribution to the appropriate case officer, but microphone reports, io prevent wide dissemination even 0001175 within the First Section, ware brought daily to the Deputy Chies : Of Is his absence to the Chief and then were distributed to the individual responsible 15 --- ## Page 193 SEVERA case officer. In this way, according to NOSENKO, no one below the rank of Deputy Chiei was aware of the total microphone "take" from the United States Embassy as received by the section. As regards political type information, and according to NOSENKO this was considered the most important by the KGB and OTU, NOSENKO had no responsibility for review or ultimate dissemination of the infor- mation to the Chief, SCD, the Chairman, KGB, or the Central Committee since this was the responsibility of a unit in the office of the Chief, SCD. NOSENKO has also stated that the output from certain of the working microphones was "dying" and that OTU in addition to having reception difficulties was also having difficulty obtaining a sufficient number of qualified monitor-translators. As a result, according to NOSENKO, OTU was not providing complete verbatim transcripts from most microphones, but actually was reporting only those portions which OIU considered pertinent. Despite the fact that full transcripts of all conversations in areas covered by active microphones would have been of interest to responsible officers of the First Section, OTU, according tO NOSENKO, did not provide full transcripts and whei asked to provide more gave the routine answer of, "we could do so if we had more personnel." According to NOSENKO, the tapes were mainiained at OTU and could not be furnished to the First Section. An officer or t 0001176 15 ? --- ## Page 194 First Section could listen io a particulai tape but he had to go to OTU to do so and as a result this was done very infrequently. It is believed that any presumption that the KGB recoverad or transcribed all conversations even in the thirteen areas listed by NOSENKO as having active microphones is noi reasonable or even realistic. It is also unrealistic to presume that any conversation con- ducted within reasonable distance of an active microphone was not compromised to the KGB. The latter is a factor to be considered in any damage assessment; it is not an appropriate basis for a presumption that NOSENKO had to have been aware of this or this just because some- one had a conversation in one of the rooms in which there was an active . microphone and NOSENKO has claimed he reviewed the "take" from microphones in the United States Embassy. It is apparent that there are a number of imponderable factors to be considered such as whether the conversation could be picked up by the microphone, whether the monitor could recover sufficient portions of the conversation to understand the gist of what was being said, and even if he did, whether he would consider it of suificient importance or interest io include in his report in verbatim or in summary form. In regard to (c), the claim of NOSENKO thai he was responsible for maintenance of the physical security flie on the United States Embassy, 17 00011'77 --- ## Page 195 it is not considered that there is an adequate basis for questioning this claim. The previous summary contained a conclusion thai the claim of NOSENKO that he was custodian of the Embassy security file was an invention. The basis for this conciusion was not then adequate and current intezviews with NOSENKO have further indicated that his claim on this point should be accepted. In regard to (d), the claim of NOSENKO that he acted in place of KOVSHUK, the Chief of First Section, when KOVSHUK was absent, it is considered that this claim is acceptable providing it is not con- verted into a presumption that therefore NOSINKO knew everything that KOVSHUK knew. NOSENKO claims that he was not responsible for the direct supervision of approximately two-thirds of the officers in the First Section. These officers normally reported directly to KOVSHUK and would only report to NOSENKO when KOVSHUK was absent. As an example of this, NOSENXO has shown a lack of detailed knowledge of the work against diplomatic personnel in the United States Embassy. He has stated he is süre he would have inown of anything "important" such as a recruitment or attempied recruitment, but he does noi claim to have reviewed all the reports of the various officers of the First 1S SECRET 0001179 --- ## Page 196 Section. His recognition of the races of individuals at the United States Embassy in 1960 - 1961 and even their assignments seems adequate. The previous criticisin that NOSINKO knew only the names of most agents or operative contacts who were part of the KGB network among the indigenous employees of the American Embassy, did not recognize their photographs, and did not give sufficient details con- cerning their specific activities is considered to be an unwarranted criticism. NOSENKO indicates that in general the handling of agents in the First Section was the responsibility of individual case officers. It is also apparent that the philosophy in the KGB was to maintain a single handler-agent relationship as much as possible, and that respon- sibility for an agent would not be transferred merely because the agent had access to a taiget who was the responsibility of a case officer other than the handler of the agent. This apparent philosophy is of particulas interest in connection with NOSENKO, who even though he was the case oîficer responsible for ABIDIAN and together with KOSOLAPOV and GRYAZNOV worked actively against code clerks, did not have an agent network which he specifically handled. Mere use of an agent foi repori- ing on or a specific activity againsi a particular target was normally 19 G001179 --- ## Page 197 not an adequaie reason to transier responsibility for the agent and it appears the KGB considers that the continuation of an established handler-agent relationship has considerable merit. NOSENKO, as previously indicated, has stated that he had the responsibility for work againsi code clerks at the United States Embassy during 1960 - 1961. Except for the period of time that he claims respon- sibility for supervision of work against the Service Attaches in early 1960, he was, according to NOSENKO, responsible for supervision of the work of Vadim A. KOSOLAPOV, Gennadiy I. GRYAZNOV, Vladimir DEMKIN and Yevgeniy GROMAKOVSKIY. GRYAZNOV and KOSOLAPOV worked only against code clerks and therefore were supervised solely by NOSENKO, whereas DEVKIN and GROMAKOVSKIY, who handled indigenous agents in American House, came under the supervision of NOSENKO only in those cases where these agents were directed against code clerks. It is quite clear that the knowledge of NOSENKO concerning the code clerks, code machine mechanics and pouch clerks who, according tO NOSENKO, were included in his targets in 1960 - 1961, was müch greaier than his knowledge of any other catezury of American employees at ine United States Embassy during this period excepi for AbiDiaN. 6001180 20 --- ## Page 198 14-00000 ( ( .! The following comments are concerned with several specific cases in which, according to NOSENKO, there was an approach by the KGB, interesting information was developed, or in which at least a considerable amouri of specific work was carried out by NOSENKO, KOSOLAPOV and GRYAZNOV. The first case, (James STORSBERG) is covered on pages 105 - 177 of the previous summary. Little additional comment is considered necessary on this case since there does not appear to be any adequate reason to question the general story of NOSENKO in regard to the KGB effort against|STORSBERG. It is recognized and mentioned elsewhere that NOSENKO in 1962 exaggerated his personal involvement in the case, particularly in placing himsel as present with GRIBANOV when the recruitment pitch was made to SIORSBERG. NOSENKO has retracted this particular claira, but there is no reason to doubt that he was engaged for approximately a year in the planning and activities which preceded the unsuccessiul approach to STORSBERG. An issue was previously made over the timing of the approach to STORSBERG since SICRSBIRG) dated this as October 1961, NOSENKO has indicated about June 19ó1, and information from GOLITSYN, based on remarks by KOVSHUK to him, had been interpreted as indicating the 21 0001181 --- ## Page 199 14-00000 approach occurred at the "end of 1960." NOSENKO, during current interviews, has given an acceptable account of the (STORSBERG)case. He has stated that he cannot precisely date the approach to STORSBIRG, bui lnat it occurred before the approach at the Moscow airport to James KEYSERS (Juze 16, 1961) because otherwise no action would have been taken against KEYSERS. When recendy reinterviewed, (STORSBERG)continued to maintain that the approach occurred in October 1961, but the incernal evidence in his description of collateral events makes it clear that the approach had to have taken place considerably earlier. (Joseph MORONE; another code cierk at the United States Embassy, who will be the subject of further discussion below, has been intesviewed on the basis of statements by STORSBERG) that MORONE) was present in American House the night of the approach. Analysis of the statements of MORONE clearly indicates that the events STORSBERG describes could not have taker place later than the period February to early May 1961. The best estimate possible at this time is thai the ayproach to (STORSBERG occurred in March - April 1961, which is quite compatible with the approximate dating of the approach by NOSENKO. In the face of this approximation of the date of the approaca to STORSBERG, it is 0001182 22 --- ## Page 200 believed reasonable to assume that the ramarks of KOVSHUK to GOLITSYN in January 1901, as related by GOLITSYN concerning a successíul operation againsi a military code clerk in Moscow at the end of 1960, referred to STORSBERG, and thai KOVSHUK either was referring to a compromise phase of the operation rather than the actual approach, or was prematurely claiming anticipated success. Pages 178 - 181 oí the previous summary contain information in regard to the attempied defection operation against James XYSERS. As of this time, it is considered that there are no discrepancies between record information and information from NOSENKO which in any way refiect against NOSENKO. KEYSERS dia not recognize a photograph of NOSENKO as the Soviet who made a fast approach to him at the air- port, but this does not provide a valid reason to disbelieve the statement Of NOSENKO that it was he who tried to talk to KEYSERS. There are certain statements relative to the KZYSERS case as set forth in the previous summary which require specific comment. (a) The statement is made that no KGB cilicer directly connected with the case could regard KEYSERS) as the replacement for STORSBERG. In fact, KEYSERS actually was being trained by STORSBERGlas a substitute, not a replacement, even thoug. his primary assignment 0001183 23 COMET --- ## Page 201 ( te to coin to d was not thât of a code cie.k. NOSENKO has during current interviews reiated dow he received the impression from the OTU reports of conversations picked up by the microphone in the Military code room at the United States Embassy that KZYSERS either was not a code clerk or had been away from code work for a considerable period of time. In azy event, the impression of NOSENKO was that STORSBERG was having a difficul time expiaining the particular work to KEYSERS. The observations of NOSINKO are of interest since KEYSERS actually had not been a code clerk but, as noted, was being trained by STORSBERG so that he could act as a substitute. Under the circumstances, it is considered quite logical that the KGB would assume at the time that XEYSERS was to be the eventual replacement of STORSBERG. (b) The previous summary stated that, "prior to his departure from Moscow, KEYSIRS acknowledged io his supervisors /Colonel URBAN/ his homosexual tendencies and he adritted involvement in three homosexual incidents, all at the American House" (page 179). 0001184 24 SEGR SET --- ## Page 202 ( Contrary to this assertion, a review of the official memorandur, dated l6 June 1961, oí (Coionel, (URBAN reflects that KEYSERS was not informed by URBAN of the "allegations of homosexuality in order not to aggravate the possibility of a rash act by him while within the Soviet Union. " (c) On page 23ó of the previous summary, the statement is made that, "In the single case in which he, ÑOSENKO/ asserted thai he relied on information pro- cured from microphones (KEYSERS) failure to report receipt of the defection invitation) he was in error." While the official record shows that KEYSERS) did indeed repori receipt of the defection latter to (Colonel) (URBAN in the office of Coionel URBAN, it should be noted that this occurred less than one hour before (KEYSERS left the Embassy for the airpori. NOSENKO has stated that in the absence of information to the contrary from microphone and telephone taps, the KGB had concluded that KEYSERS) had not reported receipt of the defection letter and there- fore had decided to approach KEYSERS at the airport. In view of the shori time between KEYSIRS report of receipt 0001185 25 --- ## Page 203 ( of the letter and ais departure iron Moscow, it would nave been remarkable i the iCE ad learned this in- formation in time to cali off ine airport approach. The account Of NOSENKO in the|KEYSERS matter therefore is considered completely credible. Pages 181 - 184 of the previous summary contain information in regard to Matthew ZUJUS, who succaaded James STORSBERG, having arrived in Moscow in Septembez 1961. GRYAZNOV was the responsible case officer for ZUJUS, according to NOSENKO. The previous summary states (page 183) that ZUJUS, during a routine debriefing, confirmed an Embassy report that in the summer of 1962 he had been intimate with an Austrian woman, "LILLIAN, " who. visited the American House with someone from the United Ara's Republic. "LILLIAN" was interviewed by the American House manager and sae claimed to be from Vienna but traveling with her employer, a Czeca. Further inquiry revealed that no Austrian passport had been issued to "LILLIAN," and she was later asked for her passport. "LILLIAi" replied that she had forgotten it, then leit, and did not return. The previous summary stated that the above incident had beer described by NOSENKO but in connection with artempts to entray Joseph ¡VORONE in 1960, not ZUJUS) in 1962. 6001186 2'6 --- ## Page 204 14-00000 ( ( Page 194 of the pievious summary relates information from NOSENKO hai GRYAZNOV went to Dasi Berlin in early 1960 to obtain two German women who could be used against the residents of American House During current interviews, this matter has been again covered with NOSENKO. According to NOSENKO, GRYAZNOV arranged for. these two women, agents of the Berlin KGB Residentura, to visit Moscow under false documentation, one as a West German and the other as an Austrian. NOSENKO further identified the "West German" agent, "HANNA, " as having the cover of a journalist, and stated he believed "HANNA" had met MORONE at American House. In a racent interview, MORONE confirmed that in early 1961 he had met a West German girl at American House who claimed to be a journalist. The staïements of MORONE therefore appear to substantiate the report of NOSENKO. Concerning the agent documented as an Austrian, NOSENKO ze- ported that she was queried about her passport at American House and as a result the KGB returned her to East Germany without further attempts to use her at American House. NOSENKO places this incident in the same time period as the "HANNA"' case; i.e., 1960 - 1961. He has never suggested any connection with ZUJUS, nor is there reason to assume that he could be referring to the experience of ZUJUS) since this iook place in the summer of 1962, alter NOSENKO had leit the American Embassy Section. 0001187 27 --- ## Page 205 ( • •I It was the conclusion of the previous summary that NOSENKO dia noi know enough about ZUJUS oi his background to have exercised any supervision in the development of ZUJUS. Granted that NOSENKO did not know many details regarding ZUJUS, the fact is that NOSENKO left the First Section, First Depariment, ât the end of 1961 at wnich time any supervisory functions of NOSENKO terminated. ZUJUS, who did not arrive in Moscow until Septembe: 1961, remained in Voscow until January 1963. NOSENKO could hardly be held responsible for knowing anything about ZUJUS after 1 January 1962. Pages 185 - 189 of the previous summary contain a synopsis of previous information from NOSINKO in regard to Paul JENNER) Basically, NOSENKO had reported that when the KGB learned that (Paul JENNER, who was thought to be a code clerk, was coming to Moscow through Helsinki, a plan was made to send Vadim V. KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki to travel on the same train as JENNER) to Moscow. A female agent of GRYAZNOV was to be placed on this train at Vyborg after the train entered the USSR. The female agent was to become acquainted with JENNER as a part of a future operation against JENNER) in Moscow, and ROSOLAPOV was also to become acquainted with (JENNER. NOSENKO has stated that the operation was successful, that both ROSOLAPOV and the ¡emale agent made the acquaintance of JENNER, 28 SEGRET 6001188 --- ## Page 206 14-00000 ....: and that he, NOSENKO, read the report submitted by KOSOLAPOV on ine trip from helsinici to Moscow. JENNER, after arriving in ivoscow, reported that he was approached on the train from Helsinki by two young Russiars, "a boy. and a giri, probably university students," who struck up a conversation. According to JENNER, they both said that they might see JENNER in Voscow. About three months later JENNER) reported being approached again by the same girl, this time at the Moscow airport wherd he had gone on courier business. There was a short conversation and she gave JENNER a phone number, insisting that he call her. The woman also advised JENNER not to mention the conversation to anyone. NOSENKO has stated that in an effort to follow up the initial train acquaintance, the KGB had arranged for the female agent to encounter (JENNER) at the Moscow railroad station or airport when he went alone to meet couriers. Insofar as is known, JENNER)has never been shown a photograph Of KOSOLAPOV. Although KOSOLAPOV was approximately 34 years of age in 1960, his photograph and remarks by NOSENKO indicate that in appearance he was much younger and that he couid have passed as a university student. 0001189 29 -o.. --- ## Page 207 14-00000 During current interviews, NOSENKO nas repeated the same general story as regards Paul JENNER. He still insists that KOSOLAPOV was on the same train with JENNER from Heisiaki. Collateral infor- mation raises difficulties here, however: Finnish train manifests indicate that JENNER was the only Moscow-bound passenger os the 31) March 1960 train from Finland to Moscow, and that one Viktor KOLOSSOV (a name NOSENKO has identified as an alias used by KOSOLAPOV) was on the 2 April 1960 train io Voscow. The above obvious discrepancy has not beer and cannot be clari- fied with available information. KOSOLAPOV (KOLOSSOV) was either on the same train as JENNER or he was not. Train manifests indicate that KOSOLAPOV was not. Nevertheless, the "boy and girl, probably university students" who, according to JENNER, struck up a conver- sation with him on the train would appear clearly to be part of the operational effort described by NOSENKO, particularly in view of the later approach of this same girl to JENNER at the airport. There is no reason io question that this girl was the female agert of CRYAZNOV. In view of the conflict between the train manifest and statements by NOSENKO, however, it is not clear who the "boy student" was: whether this somehow was KOSOLAPOV, or whether it may have been some other person entirely. 0001190 30 $E020A --- ## Page 208 ..... i It is not accepted that the train manifests are incontrovertible evidence thai KOSOLAPOV could not have been on ine same train as (JENNER. Neither is it accepted thai the train manifests are in error. There is just not a satisfactory answer for the indicated discrepancy between the train manifests and the statement of NOSENKO that KOSOLAPOV and JENNER were on the same train. If indeed KOSOLAPOV did not travel with JENNER, this does not establish anything more than that NOSENKO is wrong; it is evidence that he does not low something he, as the supervisor of ROSOLAPOV, should have known according to his own statements. Pages 190 - 192 contain a summary of previous information in regard to the John GARLAND case. GARLAND)was identified by NOSENKO as a code clerk whom the KGB was studying, but on whom no derogatory information was developed. NOSENKO provided practically no details in regard to GARLAND other than to identily him as a code clerk. GOLITSYN has reported on an incident which it is considered relates to the trip of GARLAND from Heisinki to Moscow on ló November 1960. GOLITSYN reported that in November 1960 the Helsinki KGB Residency received a Cable from Moscow advising that an Americai code clerk would be arriving in Helsinki en route to voscow and that 0001191 31 SCODET --- ## Page 209 the responsible SCD case officer, KOSCIAPOV, would be sent to Helsinki under alias to sirike up an acquaintance with the code clerk which the SCD hoped to continue in Noscow. GOLITSYN talked to KOSOLAPOV in Helsinki at that time, and the Residency procured for KOSOLAPOV a place in the compartment of the American on the train from Helsinki to Moscow. The previous summary also stated GOLITSYN had advised that läter in Helsinki he inquired of another SCD officer "from the Embassy Section" (First Section, SCD) about the case on which he had aelped KOSOLAPOV. According to GOLITSYN, the officer refused to discuss the case and be, GOLITSYN, concluded from this reaction that it must have resulted in a successful recruitment. It has been determined that GOLITSYN, in an interview with the FBI on 20 March 1962, referred to the above "SCD officer from the Enibassy Section" as (fnu) ZENKIN of the American Department. GOLIISYN also stated that the officer was in Helsinki under the alias Of SERGEEV (SERGIYEV), but was unabie to furnish a first name and patronymic for SERGEYEV. GOLITSYN referred to (inu) ZENKiN as being from the American Department, SCD. It is considered that there is no doubt that the (inu) ZEXXIN zeferred io by GOilTSYN is the individual of the same last name 32 0001192 --- ## Page 210 14-00000 Yourse. concerning whom NOSENKO has furnished information. NOSENKO has identified ZENKIN (whose first name he does not recall but possibly is Yuriy) as an officer of the Second Section, First Depari- ment, SCD. According to NOSINKO, one group of the Second Section both before and after 1960 - 1961 was engaged in "operative games" against American Inteiligence and that ZENKIN was a member of this group. NOSENKO has advised that ZENKIN traveled abroad in connection with activities of the Second Section, but that he had no specific knowledge regarding the activities of ZENKIN on these trips. NOSENKO has fur- nished some fragmentary information which he learned in regard to ZENKIN and when the full name of SERGEYEV (ZENKIN) together with his photograph is obtained, this fragmentary information from NOSENKO may prove quite useful. As regards the KOSOLAPOV-GARLAND matter and the opirion expressed by GOLITSYN based on the refusal of ZENKIN to discuss the. case (GARLAND) that it must have resulted in a successiul recruitment, there appears to be an inadequate basis for this presumption. According to NOSENKO, and there is no reason to disbelieve NOSENKO on this point, ZENKIN was in the Second Section, not the First Section, in 1950 - 1961. He was not Chief of the Section, but only a Senior Case 33 SECRET 0001193 --- ## Page 211 14-00000 Officer. Since KOSOLAPOV. was an officer of the First Section and the work against GARLAND was the responsibility of the First Section, it does noi appear that ZINKIN would necessarily have knowof any developments in the KOSOLAPOV-GARLAND) matter. The Finnish train manifest of 16 November 1960 for the Helsinki to Moscow train lists John GARLAND' and Viktor KOLOSSOV (alias of KOSOLAPOV) as passengers. GARLAND, when interviewed in 1962 following the lead from GOLITSYN, deried having met any Soviet with the physical description of KOSOLAPOV on the Heisinki-to-Moscow. trip, and denied ever being approached by Soviet Intelligence. Later interviews by the FBI and a polygraph interview did not indicate that he hãd ever met KOSOLAPOV or that he had ever knowingly been contacted by any foreign intelligence agent. It is accepted that KOSOLAPOV went from Moscow to Helsinki in November 1960, that he talked with GOLITSYN there, and that he was on the same train as GARLAND from Helsinki to Moscow. It is also accepted that NOSENKO is unaware that KOSOLAPOV made a trip to Helsinki in November 1960. Travel for an SCD officer outside the USSR o Bloc countries requires high-level approval, according to NOSENKO. It does not 0001194 34 --- ## Page 212 14-00000 ( matter that the incividual has previously traveied on a similar mission, each trip must have specific high-level approval. The red tape which thus must inevitably nave been involved in preparation ior such a trip further supports the assumption that NOSENKO should have known about the KOSOLAPOV-GARLAND trip. The position taken by NOSENKO on this point is that he accepts the statement by the interviewer that KOSOLAPOV made süch a trip, but he says that he, NOSENKO, simply does not know anything about it. He adds only that had anything significant developed in the study Of GARLAND, he would have been aware of it. NOSENKO, as supervisor of the group working against code clerks, should have known of any trip of KOSOLAPOV to Finland in 1960 or 1961. NOSENKO himself was out of Voscow on a trip to Cuba from 15 November 1960 to circa 17 December 1960. The possibility exists that this could have accounted for his lack of knowledge of the trip of KOSOLAPOV to Helsinki and return to Moscow on 16 November 1960. However, NOSENKO has not attempted to use his Cuban trip as a possible explanation for not knowing of the November KOSOLAPOV trip. As with the JENNER, KOSOLAPOV case, it is not possible at this time to resolve the discrepancies pertairing to the GARLAND; KOSOLAPON trip. The fact thet NOSaNKO danies any kobullie 35 --- ## Page 213 ( this operational activity of KOSOLAPOV is another apparent instance, as in the JENNER case, of his not kaowing something he, by his own statements, should have known. Viewed in the coniext of the total knowledge of NOSENKO of operations against code clerks, however, neither the problems in the 'JENNER case nor those in the GARLAND case, singly or combined, in any way represent conclusive evidence that NOSENKO was not super- VISOr Of KOSOLAPOV or that he was not responsible for the code clerk operations described by NOSENKO. This statement, however, was not substantiated in the previous summary. Pages 193 - 199 of the previous summary contain an account of KGB activity against code clerk Joseph MORONE from various sources, including NOSENKO. NOSENKO first mentioned the case in 1962. According to NOSENKO, the responsible case officer for work against MORONE was KOSOLAPOV. When it was learned that MORONE and an Embassy colleague, a Marine guard by the name of|BEGGS, were pianning a vacation trip to Warsaw, arrangements were made with the UB (the Polish Security Service) for a female Polish agent to come to Moscow and travel from there to Warsaw on the same train as MORONE) and BEGGS. The intent was for the agent, either on the train or sub- seguently in Warsaw, to meet and compromise MORONE sexually. She 0001196 36 37291 --- ## Page 214 successfully accompiished this, but due to certain problems in KGB-UB liaison relations, it was not possible for the KGB io expioit this directly. The previous summary stated that with respeci to the female UB agent, there was persuasive evidence that neither NOSENKO nor KOSOLAPOV played the roies in the MORONE case described by NOSENKO. That summary cited the travel of NOSENKO to Cuba and Of KOSOLAPOV to finiand at approximately the same time as the MORONE trip to Warsaw as evidence of the impossibility of NOSENKO ana KOSOLAPOY being invoived personally in this part of the iVORONI case. NOSENKO has stated that KOSOLAPOV met the Polish female agent and made the arrangements to place her on the train to Warsaw. (MORONE and BEGGS) departed Moscow on 12 November 1960. it is not known when KOSOLAPOV left Moscow for Helsinki, but he was on the 16 November 1960 train manifest as departing Helsinki for vioscow. NOSENKO departed Moscow on 15 November 1960 for Cuba. The activities described by NOSENKO are therefore possibie within the known time frame. It is clear that NOSENKO in 1962 exaggerated his personal role in the MORONE) case, particularly when he staied that he, NOSENKO, placed the female agent on the train. NOSENKO now clearly states that 6001197 37 --- ## Page 215 14-00000 KOSOLAPOV was the oniy ICB officer in contact with the Polish agent. NOSENKO previously stated that a KGB technician who was on the train from Moscow to Warsaw reported back to NOSENKO the day after the train arrived in Warsaw. Later NOSENKO said that instead of talking to the technician personally, he may have read the report of the technician after he returned from Cuba. The activities described by NOSENKO with regard to this matter are accordingly possible within the known time frame. It is not con- sidered that the retractions NCS ENKO has made from his original statements on this operation are of sufficient significance to materially discredit him. Page 198 of the previous summary contains the statement that MORONE, when interviewed, denied having been intimate with Svetlana IVANOVA, a KGB agent employed at the American House. NOSENKO had stated that IVANOVA was instructed to report everything she saw or heard concerning/MORONE (page 194). The summary, however, cited a number of reports that MORONE had been intimate with IVANOVA and with Ella UMANETS, also a KGB agent employed at the American House, and commented that NOSENKO therefore was apparently unaware of the sexual involvement of MORONE with "IVANOVA's friends." 0001198 38 SESRET --- ## Page 216 14-00000 ( ( NOSENKO, during cuirent inierviews, has indicated awareness ofat least some invoivement of IVANOVA with MORONE. He has fur- nished information on a developing operation against Marine guard ¡GARCIA (Anthony A. GARCIA) based on the involvement of GARCIA) with IVANOVA. He has also stated that the possibility was considered of using IVANOVA against MORONE to obtain compromising photographs. This plan was seriously affected when it was learned from the militiaman/KGB guard at the United States Embassy that IVANOVA, her girl friend, MORONIand a Varine guard, possibly GARCiA, had been in the city," then returned to the "flat" of one of the Marines where the girls spent the night. This apparently placed the reliability Of IVANOVA in question in the eyes of the First Section. According to the previous summary, NOSENKO stated that Pietro CECCHI, Italian cook ai the American Embassy and agent of KOSOLAPOV, reported on Americans at the Embassy, but NOSENKO recalled nothing specific that CECCHI had reported about MORONE. The summary also states that MORONE was said by other American Embassy employees to be a close friend of CECCHI and that MORONE)had admitted black market money exchanges with CECCHI. During current interviews, NOSENKO has stated that CECCHI furnished "pieces" of information concerning MORONE, but he, NOSENKO, 0001199 39 SEGREY --- ## Page 217 14-00000 ( knew of no black market involvement of MORONE with CECCHI. NOSENKO has aiso indicated that the KGB sometimes suspected, and on occasion actually became aware that various agents did not fully report everything of interest to the KGB. The KGB of course was aware that CECCHI was involved in the biack market. However, whether he reported to the KGB everything he did and with whom is open to question; viz., the Maurice ZWANG) case below. The comment was made in the previous summary that NOSENKO was unaware that MORONE/met some Soviet females in the spring of 1961 at the apartment of Saiwat el SHAZLY, an Egyptian-national KGB agent of the Sixth Department who was also reporting on Americans, and was intimate with one in this apartment. A review of oificial records indicates that VORONE) did report having met some Soviet girls at the apartment of Sarwat, but there is no indication that he admitted or that anyone else has reported that he was intimate with any of them. The conclusion of the previous summary in this regard was based on a misinterpretation. Accordingly, since there is no reason to believe that any compromise incident took place in the Sarwat apartment, the story of NOSENKO on this matter is con- sidered completely acceptable. ( 40 6001200 --- ## Page 218 14-00000 3E0211 ( A few comments are appropriate concerning iemarks in the previous summary on pages 199 - 204. Comments were made there concerning five code clerks, Maurice ZWANG, John TAYLOR, Frank) (DAY, Robert DWELLY and Joseph GAFFEY, and although it is not specifically stated, the suggestion is apparent that the reporting of NOSENKO on these cases was considered evidence that NOSENKO was • not supervisor of all KGB operations against code clerks. The follow- ing observations may assist in placing these cases in their proper perspective: (a) Maurice ZWANG - ZWANG was identified by NOSENKO as a code clerk who was actively "worked on" during 1960 - 1961. The previous summary suggested that the knowledge of NOSENKO regarding KGB activity against ZWANG was inadequate. First, reporting of NOSENKO on ZWANG contained no reference to the relationship of ZWANG with his maid, whom NOSENKO in another case has identifiea as a KGB agent. Although ZWANG) denied sexual relations with his maid, he did admit to some intimacies with her in her apartment. During polygraph examination ZWANG) reacted when he 41 0001261 --- ## Page 219 14-00000 responded in the negative to a question regarding sexual relations with his maid. The iailure of NOSENKO to re- port on this relationship can be ascribed to ignorance, but also can be piausibly explained by faulty memory on his part or failure on the part oi the maid to report details of this relationship to the KGB. Second, NOSENKO had not reported that (ZWANG) was involved in the currency operations of Pietro CICCHI. (A fact that previous summary implied he should have known from KGB agent CECCHI.) From the record, cow- ever, it appears that the dealings of ZWANG were not directly with CECCHI, but rather through other Embassy employees, making it plausible that CECCHI was either unaware of the involvement of ZWANG Or, as NOSENKO himself stated he suspected, CECCHI did not report all details of his currency operations to his KGB handier. (b) (John TAYLOR - NOSENKO identified TAYLOR as a State Department code clerk)and target of KOSOLAPOV. The KGB was aware of the involverent of (TAYLOR) with his Soviet maid, but no attempt was made to recruit TAYLOR) before his departure in early 19ó1 since to do so might 42 0001202 STORE: --- ## Page 220 14-00000 endanger the pians for a recruitment approach to James: STORSBERG, who had been inder development for almost a year and was considered more valuable. The implication of the previous summary that the explanation given by NOSENKO was subject to question failed to take into account the fact that although STORSBERG) was not approached until after the departure of IAYLOR; the operation against STORSBERG was underway before (TAYLOR became involved with his maid. Further, it is apparent that the KGB did not abandon interest in TAYLOR since he was approached at a later date outside the USSR on the basis of his previous affair with his maid in Moscow. (c) (Frank DAY - NOSENKO identified' Frank DAY'as a State Department code clerk|who was the target of either KOSOLAPOV or GRYAZNOV. According to NOSENKO, nothing "interesting" was learned about DAY) and no oper- ational measures were taken against DAY. The previous summary noted that in July 1961, DAY) traveled to the Caucasus with his friend and former overt CIA employee, Agriculiural Attache G. Stanley BROWN.' It was also stated that the two were under surveillance by five persons 43 0001203 VE022T --- ## Page 221 ( SEGRETA at all times on the above trip, that they found a "repairman" in their hotel room wien way unexpectedly returned, and that on another occasion an "a'tractive and available Soviet female" was believed to have been planted in their train compartment. According to NOSENKO, surveillance and any other local coverage of any employee ai the United States Embassy who travels in the USSR is the responsibility of the locál KGB organization, not the SCD. It would appear that the local organization was trying to do a thorough job on DAY! and BROWN, but it apparently was nonproductive. It does not seem justifiable to expect that NOSENKO should have recalled a trip which produced no results. (d) Robert DWELLY - NOSENKO has related in con- siderable detail the efforts of NOSENKO, GRYAZNOV and KOSOLAPOV to involve Robert DWELLY, a code clerk) in Moscow from April 1959 - July 1960, in a homosexual com- promise operation. According to NOSENKO, a homosexual agent of GRYAZNOV was of the opinion (DWELLY was a homosexual. 6001204 44 SEGRET --- ## Page 222 ( • in . There is no reason to doubt the statement of NOSENKO concerning KGB efforts to determine when and where DWELLY was going "into the city" (Moscow) so that a homosexual compromise situation could be arranged. There were no specific developments from their efforts, according to NOSENKO. (DWELLY has categorically denied being a homo- sexual; NOSENKO has not said he was, but only that the homosexual agent of GRYAZNOV assessed DWELLY) as. a homosexual. There does not appear to be any reason to consider the statements of NOSENKO about DWELLY as reflecting adversely on NOSENKO. (e) Joseph GAFFEY - NOSENKO has identified 'Joseph GAFFEY as a code clerk. The previous summary noted that NOSENKO had stated the KGB had tried to lure GAFFEY into downtown Moscow, using Svetlana IVANOVA, an agent of DEMKIN in the American House. By way of comment, the previous summary stated. that GAFFEY arrived in Moscow in September 196i and that Fred KADERA;had reported that GAFFEY had told him he had been intimaïe with a Russian girl at the AmeNitrF2C5 45 SECRET --- ## Page 223 14-00000 House. It was further noted that GAFFEY was recalled: from Moscow in the summer oi 1962 because of drunken- ness and during interview had admitted being intimate with IVANOVA at the American House and at her apart- ment and that she had claimed pregnancy. As to whether the above information raises a question concerning NOSENKO, the following factors should be considered: (1) NOSENKO has stated that during the latter part of December 1961 he was part time in the First Department and part time in the Seventh Department, and that he reported full time to the Seventh Department after New Years Day 1962. (2) In addition to the information previously mentioned as furnished by GAFFEY during inter- view, GAFFEY also stated that he was first intimate with IVANOVA in his room on 27 December 1951 and was also intimate with her later on three occasions at her apartment. According to GAFFEY, IVANOVA told him of her pregnancy about i May 46 SECRET 0001206 --- ## Page 224 1962, which is approximately four months after NOSENKO has stated he transierred to the Seventa Department. The matter of review by NOSENKO of OTU reports from micio- phone coverage on the United States Embassy has previously been mentioned in this summary. Pages 226 - 236 of the previous summary contained a detailed account of information from NOSENKO on the matter of microphones, countermeasures taken by the Americans in 1964, and damage estimates prepared by the Americans. The previous conclusion was that his information did not sustain his claim to have been Deputy Chief, First Section, or his claim that he personally reviewed the KGB microphone monitoring reports. Comments have been made in this summary in regard to this previous conclusion. A few remarks, it is believed, will assist in a fuller understandina of the microphone matter. In the material brought out by NOSENKO ii 1964, there was a single sheet of paper containing on one side hand- written notes which NOSENKO identified as a list of the active micro- phones (those which were being monitored) in the United States Embassy. This list is given on page 227 of the previous summary and need not be rapeated here. The acquisition of this list by NOSENKO was character- ized in the previous summary as singular and it was stated thai NOSENKO 0001207 47 --- ## Page 225 14-00000 has never plausibly explained the circumstances which prompted his retention of the list until 1964, when he produced it for CIA in Geneva. During current interviews, the matter of the above list has been covered in considerably greater detail with NOSENKO than had been done before. His explanation, both of the circumstances which led to his acquiring the list as well as of his still having it in his possession at the time of his defection, is considered plausible, contrary to the judgment of the previous summary. NOSENKO has stated that in 1960 - 1961 Vladimir I. PETROV, Chief of the Second Section, First Department, desired some "points" for use against targets of his section. NOSENKO uses the term "point" not as meaning just a microphone, but as referring to an OTU sub-unit which includes microphones as well as the necessary monitors and translators to cover the microphone and translate the "take." The targets of PETROV were primarily Americans and, therefore, there was a transcription-translation problem. According to NOSENKO, most of the available "points" were assigned to the First Section to cover microphones in the United States Embassy. The Chief of the First Department, Viadimir A. KLYPIN, held a meeting attended by KLYPIN, Chief of the First Section Viadislav KOVSHUK, Vladimir I. PETROV, and NOSENKO, the purpose of waich 0001208 48 6:0357 --- ## Page 226 14-00000 was to discuss the possibility of temporarily discontinuing certain Embassy "points" controlled by the First Section, and permitting PETROV to use these "points" against targets of his section. According to NOSINKO, PETROV brought to the meeting a list of names of certain targets to which he wished to give technical cover- age. During the meeting, KOVSHUK apparently took a piece of paper which PETROV had and wrote on it a list of active microphones in the United States Embassy and residences. When the meeting ended, NOSENKO had this paper and he took it back to his office. Contained on the reverse side of the paper were the iollowing names in Russian: (LUBIN, SMITH, Will BURTIN, and Sipe BURTIN. The name A. A. MIKHAYLOV was listed next to the name of LUBIN, and the name of Y. E. CHERNETSEV was listed next to the name of SMITH. NOSENKO has explained that LUBIN, SMITH, Will BURTIN, and Sipe BURIIN were among the targets of PETROV; and MIKHAYLOV and CHERNETSEV were officers of the Second Section. NOSENKO stated he knew nothing more about the four non-Soviet names except that they were targets of PETROV. NOSENKO stated that he could not be positive of the date of the meeting other than that it occurred while KLYPIN was Chief of the First Departmea. (According tO NOSENKO, KLYPIN was succeeded by Sergey Mi. FEDOSEYEV as 0001209 49 9222-7 Done. --- ## Page 227 14-00000 Chief of the First Department in Circa mid-1961.) Research in regard to the four non-Soviei names leaves 10 doubt that|LUBIN is George; (LUBIN; and that Will SURTIN and Sipe BURTINare correct names, with Sipe being the wife of Will BURTIN) All three are American citizens who were in the USSR circa June 1961. (SMITH) at this time, has still not been identified. In view of the above, it has been possible to deduce the date of the meeting called by KLYPIN as circa June 1961. According to NOSENKO, the piece of paper described above was placed by NOSENKO with other notes he kept between the pages of a bound volume which NOSENKO calls a "working copy." This, according to NOSENKO, was an accountable, registered notebook issued to all officers in which they were supposed to write all their notes, destroying any other notes. According to NOSENKO, he, like many other officers, did not completely follow regulations and the tendency was to frequently put loose notes in the notebook so that the notebook often acted as a file rather than being used in the way required by regulations. NOSENKO has stated that when he left the First Section he took various notes with him to the Seventh Department; these included notes he had drafted concerning certain First Section activities for use in briefing FEDOSEYEV 0001210 50 SECRET --- ## Page 228 14-00000 SEONGI when FEDOSEYEV succeeded KLYPIN, and notes he had prepared for lectures to the Seventh Directorate. According to NOSENKO, he did not intentionally take the particular paper pertaining to microphones; it was just in the group oi notes he took along when he went to the Seventh Department. In consideration of the above explanation by NOSENKO, it should be noted that he also brought with him in 1964 his notes for the briefing of FEDOSEYEV and certain notes he obviously had also prepared while in the First Section; e. g., his notes for a lecture to the Seventh Directorate in regard to a "mass surveillance" on the American Embassy. By including a section (pages 236 - 239) on the knowledge of NOSENKO of the KGB cryptologic attack on United States Embassy communications, the previous summary implies that there is some reason to question his information on this subject. NOSENKO has asserted that the KGB had never succeeded in reading enciphered communications of the Service Attaches; however, he said that the Eighth Directorate (the unit of the KGB responsible for communications intercept and cryptologic analysis) was reading some United States Embassy traffic. While it is open to question to what extent knowledge of successes of the Eighth Directorate would be known C001211 51 --- ## Page 229 to anyone in the First Section of the First Department, within the scope plausibly availabie to NOSENKO in his claimed position, there is no reason to question his statement. In the previous summary (pages 240 - 248), the failures or successes of NOSENKO in identifying CIA officers are noted. With the exception of ABIDIAN, NOSENKO does not claim to have been the responsible case officer for any of the listed CIA officers. According to his claim, NOSENKO should have been aware that William N. MORELI was CIA, but he hasnever identified MORELL as CIA. Surely KOVSHUK knew MORELL was CIA but why NOSENKO is not aware MORELI was CIA is not known. It has already been established, however, that NOSENKO, as Deputy Chief, was not aware of all of the activities of KOVSHUK. are appropriate. As regards some of the other listed individuals, a few remarks (a) NOSENKO has never indicated any knowledge Paul GARBLER was CIA, and yet GARBLER was surely known to the FCD as a CIA employee before going to Moscow. It is presumed that the FCD furnished the SCD at least basic information that Paul GARBLER was "American Intelligence." GARBLER, however, did not 0001212 52 SEGRET --- ## Page 230 14-00000 and ines. arrive in Voscow until Noverber 1961, only a month before NOSENKO left the First Section for the Seventh Department. (b) The previous summary stated that according tO NOSENKO the KGB did not suspect that was a CIA officer, yet he was a CIA officer. It was also stated that reported the presence of intensive KGB surveillance while in Moscow irom October 1960 to September 1961. The "intensive KGB surveillance" is based on statements of and may possibly be more a reflection of his personal concern over surveillance rather than what was actually happening. (c) Steve WASHENKO was correctly identified by NOSENKO as CIA. William HORBALY was CIA and identified by NOSENKO as suspected of being a CIA officer or cooptee. (d) Lewis BOWDEN, who was not CIA, was, according to NOSENKO, suspected of being a CIA officer. George Payne WINTERS, JI., has stated that ROVSHUK warned WINTERS that BOWDEN was the "FBI officer" in the Embassy. The Cherepanov Papers indicate 0001213 53 SEGRET --- ## Page 231 that the KC Lad reasons to cossider the activitles of BOWDEN with suspleion. It is not balleved that the linted Sallures of NOSENKO to identliy CIA officera are of partiesist significance is establishing that be was 0s was not Deputy Chial of the First Sacion. There ara too many run- 1n0r factors which would sand to be considered. Despite our asmump- fione so to whas the KGB knows, l1 1s possiblo that (a) t2e KGS did not low of the ClA afflintion of than people, (D) le taformation Inowa to tha KGS was not avallable at the first Sectios, Firn Department, Jovel, or (c) information available to the Chiel of tha Firaz Section or to a spoelde cane ollicer was of no official concern to NOSENKO and was 201 made avallablo to him. The last of those posalbilities de suggested in spite of claires by NOSINKO that he had to have noma whatever waa known in the Section regarding CIA identifications; a propensity on she part of NOSENKO to exeggerate the aren of his owr knowledgeability ban been seen alsewhere lo this caso. Pages 252 - 258 al tha previous summary contais a report of the 1960 zip of NOSENKO to Cuba and his 1961 trip to Bulgaria. Wich regara to the Caba trip, there la collateral ovidence of lis travel as described by NOSENXO, and there la so aubutantire senson to doube his account of his activides on thia trip. The statement was made la 54 0001214 --- ## Page 232 14-00000 this: ( the previous summary that the travel of NOSENKO to Cuba in 1960 damaged his claim that he was supervising operations against Embassy code clerks at the time. To accepi the validity of this judgment is to say that no supervisor in the SCD would be permitted to make a trip abroad unrelated to his supervisory function, a judgment for which there is no supporting evidence. As regards the trip of NOSENKO to Bulgaria in 1961, for which there is no collateral information, the previous summary concluded that his account of the trip was untrue and argued that such a trip to Bulgaria, if it did take place, at a time when he claimed the operation against |STORSBERG was reaching a climax and his subordinates were "apparently planning to exploit KEYSERS) newly-discovered vulnerability, " it would indicate thai the presence of NOSENKO in Moscow was dis- pensable. There was, however, no evidence that NOSENKO did not travel to Bulgaria and only highly speculative reasoning as to why his account of the purpose of the trip was untrue. As to the (STORSBERG) case, while it cannot at present be proved that the recruitment pitch took place before NOSENKO left for Bulgaria, it can be stated, on the basis of reporting from MORONE, that it had to nave taken place before the time NOSENKO returned from Bulgaria. Since no serious quesda has ever been raised concerning the fillence 55 8300 97 --- ## Page 233 of NOSENIO in Moscow at the time this pitch was made, it would appear that NOSENKO was comparatively free to go to Bulgaria because this phase of the (STORSBERG) operation had been completed. As to the KEYSERS case, there is no apparent probier since it is clear that the approach to KEYSERS took place aiter NOSENKO returned from Bulgaria, and furthermore that the KGB probably did not become aware that KEYSERS was a homosexual, and thereíore potentially vulnerable, until just before the pitch was made. In short, there is no reason to believe that the accounts by NOSENKO of his trips to Cuba and to Bulgaria are not essentially true, or that if they are true they necessarily reflect on his claim to having been supervisor of code clerk operations. 0001216 56 S50RE7 --- ## Page 234 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 235 14-00000 SECRET F. NOSENKO'S CLAIMS, THAI IN 1962 HE WAS CHIEF OF THE AMERICAN-BRITISE COMMONWEALTH SECTION AND WAS THEREAFTER A DEPUTY CHIEF OF THE SEVENTH DEPARIMENT; ARE NOT CREDIBLE 0001217 SECRET --- ## Page 236 SECRET F. NOSENKO's claims, that in 1962 he was Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section and was thereafter a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department, are not credible. (Previous conclusion) The conclusion of this summary is that NOSENKO was Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section (First Section) from January 1962 to July 1962 and that he was a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department thereafter. NOSENKO has stated that, although he was offered the position of a Deputy Chief of the First Department, SCD, by Oleg M. GRIBANOV, Chief, SCD, and although an order had been prepared and was in the Personnel Directorate, he declined the proffered position. According to NOSENKO, he knew that Sergey Mikhaylovich FEDOSEYEV, the Chief of the First Department, did not want NOSENKO as a Deputy Chief, but instead wanted to promote Vladislav KOVSHUK, then Chief of the First Section, to the position. FEDOSEYEV was SECRET C001218 cumigrating and --- ## Page 237 SECRET willing to promote NOSENKO to the position of Chief, First Section. However, GRIBANOV did not wish to promote KOVSHUK and NOSENKO considered that under the circumstances it would be better for him to return to the Seventh Department rather than to become a Deputy to FEDOSEY EV who wanted KOVSHUKas a Deputy. Vladimir Dmitriyevich CHELNOKOV had offered NOS ENKO the position of Chief of the First Section, Seventh Department, pending the reassignment of BALDIN to Germany at which time NOSENKO would become a Deputy Chief, Seventh Department, replacing BALDIN. The above explanation of NOSENKO seems plausible and credible and indi- cates that GRIBANOV, the Chief of the SCD, for reasons best known tò GRIBANOV, was assisting NOSENKO in his career in the KGB. This section actually covers two periods in the claimed career of NOSENKO; namely, January - July 1962 as Chief of the First Section, and July 1962 - January 1964 as a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Depart- ment. Since NOSENKO was in Geneva, Switzerland, from March to June 1962, he actually cannot be seriously faulted for not having de- tailed knowledge of the activities of the First Section during January - July 1962. The previous summary (pages 268 - 291) contains remarks. in regard to the January - July 1962 period, including the period of March - June 1962 when he was in Geneva.. Four specific tourist cases 0001219 2 PERPET --- ## Page 238 14-00000 are discussed in the previous summary: the cases of Wallace Everett JOHNSON, William Carroll JONES, Natalie BIENSIOCK, and Horst BRAUNS. Apparent conflicts between information from NOSENKO and information derived from subsequent interviews with these individuals were cited as evidence impugning NOSENKO. It is not believed that the previous comments concerning these cases constitute any substantial evidence that NOSENKO did not hold the claimed position of Chief of the First Section, Seventh Department, during January - July 1962. That there were KGB operations against JOHNSON, JONES, BIENSTOCK and) BRAUNS) has been confirmed through interviews by the FBI of all four individuals. A few additional remarks in regard to the above four cases are warranted, not because it is considered that there are any substantial discrepancies between what NOSENKO has said and what each individual stated when interviewed, but because they may provide additional clari- fication. In the Wallace Everett JOHNSON case, it was previously noted that JOHNSON arrived in Moscow on 31 December 1961 and that the KGB operation against him occurred on 5 January 1962. The summary sug- gested that the short lapse of time indicated that the homosexual tend - encies of JOHNSON were known to the KGB prior to his arrival, contrary to the statements of NOSENKO. NOSENKO during current in griews 3 SECRET --- ## Page 239 14-00000 has stated that the KGB learned of the homosexual tendencies of JOHNSON "by chance" soon after his arrival, "SHMELEV" and "GRIGORIY, " two homosexual agents of NOSENKO, were at the time operating out of a room at the Metropol Hotel where JOHNSON stayed. They met JOHNSON there and reported his apparent homosexual tendencies. "In regard to the William Carroll JONES case, NOSENKO during current interviews has furnished additional information on the KGB operation against (JONES, including the woman Ludmila BUGAYEVA who was recruited as an agent to work against JONES and was used in another case. The other details furnished by NOSENKO concerning the JONES case are compatible with his claim to having been Chief of the First Section, Seventh Department. In regard to the Natalie BIENSTOCK case, NOSENKO did not claim to have been the responsible case officer but was able to provide enough specific information concerning the case to bring about a confession when she was interviewed by the FBI. That he did not know all the details con- cerning the BIENSTOCK case could be explained by his claim to have been Chief of Section and not the case officer directly involved with the case. In regard to the Horst BRAUNS) case, in the previous summary the criticism was levied that NOSENKO did not know why BRAUNS visited the USSR and was not able to identify any Soviet citizens whom BRAUNS) met in the USSR. It was also stated that NOSENKO had explained that 0001221 SECRET --- ## Page 240 14-00000 (. the Seventh Department was not concerned with foreigners visiting relatives in the USSR nor with Soviet expatriates.. NOSENKO, accord- ing to the previous summary, was aware that BRAUNS was a former Soviet citizen and the summary stated that his plan to visit relatives was information available to the KGB through his visa application. In regard to the statement that the Seventh Department was not concerned with foreigners visiting relatives in the USSR nor with Soviet expatriates, this is not in agreement with current information from NOSENKO. " Cases of "true" tourists, whick were normally, the respon- sibility of the Seventh Department, could become the responsibility of another department or KGB component where Soviét relatives were involved. However, if the case was not taken over or assigned by higher authority to another department or component, it was and remained the responsibility of the Seventh Department. The fact that BRAUNS) was a former Soviet citizen could very well have made BRAUNS of interest to the Second Section, First Department, or a direction in the Service of the SCD. However, in the absence of an actual reassignment by higher authority, the case would remain the responsibility of the Seventh Depart» ment since (BRAUNS) was visiting the Soviet Union on a tourist visa. The previous summary also indicated that BRAUNS listed on his visa appli- cation that he planned to visit relatives in Leningrad. BRAUNS had a * By 1962 there had been a large reorganization in the SCD and in the Seventh Department. The sitiation was not the same b0&h4795%. SERDET --- ## Page 241 14-00000 ( relative or relatives in Leningrad. Although BRAUNS, when interviewed by the FBI, mentioned a number' of items of which the KGB was aware concern- ing his background and occupation from his visa application, there is no specific reference in these interviews indicating his statement of purpose in visiting the USSR. Pages 282 - 286 of the previous summary reviews remarks by NOSENKO on the Boris BELITSKIY case and states that his claimed role in the case was not plausible. There are several specific points made in the summary which imply that NOSENKO was lying about his knowledge of the case. There is adequate reason to believe that NOSENKO exaggerated his own 1962 role in that NOSENKO now states he was to give assistance to Vladimir Lvovich ARTEMOV in the handling of BELITSKIY in Geneva in 1962 and not to supervise ARTEMOV. The more important aspect and the primary one is the difference in what NOSENKO specifically reported about the BELITSKIY case and infor mation from the actual CIA record of the case. There are major differ- ences and without going into all the details of the case which is very involved, an effort has been made toward determining whether these apparent differ- ences necessarily indicate that NOSENKO was or is lying or whether there is a possibility he is relating the actual KGB version of the case. NOSENKO has stated that BELITSKIY was a KGB agent whom American Intelligence recruited in London in 1960 or 1961 and that the 0001223 6 SECRET --- ## Page 242 14-00000 KGB purpose in running the operation was to lure American Intelligence into meeting BELITSKIY inside the USSR. The previous summary stated that NOSENKO did not know when the BELITSKIY operation started (Brussels, Belgium, 1958), did not know the nature of the British involvement, did not know the operational details and contact arrange - ments BELITSKIY had with CIA, and did not know BELITSKIY's pattern of activity in Moscow or Geneva. NOSENKO during current interviews has indicated an awareness that the KGB (Second Section, First Department) had been trying to use BELITSKIY against the British. However, he still has dated the recruit- ment of BELITSKIY as 1960-1961 in London and still states that the primary purpose of the KGB was to involve American Intelligence in contacts with BELITSKIY within the USSR. The latter was considered completely inconsistent with the fact that BELITSKIY was recruited in Brussels, Belgium, in 1958; that three letters bad been mailed to BELITSKIY in the USSR in 1959 and early 1960; and that BELITSKIY had an accommodation address for contact outside the USSR. There are at this time sufficient unresolved questions in the BELITSKIY case to preclude any conclusion that the apparent dis- crepancies between the statements by NOSENKO on the BELITSKIY case and the actual record are a reflection against NOSENKO 0001224 7 SECRET --- ## Page 243 the other hand, there is some reason to believe NOSENKO has furnished the actual KGB version of the BELITSKIY case and that the KGB, at least as of 1962, did not know the true story of the relation- ship of BELITSKIY with CIA. There is a distinct possibility the KGB believed the BELITSKIY recruitment occurred in 1961 in London and BELITSKIY did not then nor ba's he since admitted to the KGB his association with CIA actually started in 1958 in Brussels, Belgium. As a possible reason why BELITSKIY would have told the KGB in 1961 a partial story of his contact with American Intelligence, some at present unknown event may have occurred in 1961 which caused BELITSKIY to believe his security was endangered and as a result Le told the KGB of certain events in London in 1961, relating these. events as being the original approach to BELITSKIY by CIA. The following are certain of the points which suggest the KGB actually considered that BELITSKIY was recruited by CIA in London in 1961 and tbat BELITSKIY may have never told the KGB of the developments in his case prior to 1961: (a) BELITSKIY was in London in April 1960 at which time he was in contact with a British citizen who was also reporting to MI-5. This individual reported information received from BELITSKIY which may have been a lead to 0001225 8 SECRET --- ## Page 244 14-00000 Scontai George BLAKE. (It seems highly unlikely the KGB would ever have directed BELITSKIY to furnish information which may have been a lead to George BLAKE, or at least could have caused the employees of the unit in which BLAKE was employed from June 1959 to August 1960 to come under suspicion as having passed information to Soviet Intelligence.) (b) NOSENKO has stated that BELITSKIY, after he went to Geneva in 1962, managed to reinitiate contact with CIA rather quickly because he met a girl he had previously known whom he was sure was an American Intelligence agent and that she must have reported his presence in Geneva to American Intelligence. (I the BELITSKIY case had been controlled by the KGB from its inception in 1958, the KGB would have known of the internal mailings to BELITSKIY and the fact that BELITSKIY had a cover address outside the Soviet Union through which to initiate contact. However, if BELITSKIY did not tell the KGB anything about his contacts with CIA prior to 1961 and then gave only a partial story of what happened in London in 1961, BELITSKIY would not have told the KGB of the internal mail- ings to BELIISKIY in the USSR or the fact that he long had a cover address outside the USSR. BELITSKIY therefore 6001228 9. --- ## Page 245 would not have told the KG3 how he actually made contact with American Intelligence in Geneva in 1962, but very well could have toid the KGB ie had seen a particular woman whom he had previously koowr, he was sure she worked for American Intelligence and it was through this woman American Intelligence became aware BELITSKIY was in Geneva. ) (c) BELITSKIY in 1962 in Geneva agreed to meat within the USSR an individual representing CIA. ' However, ais agreement was only under certain stipulated conditions, the most interesting of whick was that the individual must be unwitting of the true nature of the relationship of BELITSKIY with CIA. In addition, any message to BELITSKIY or any individual who met BELITSKIY must make no reference to any previous meeting of BELITSKIY with CIA. The above conditions are quite explainabie if BELITSKIY had not been under KGB control between 1958 and 1961 and in 1961 gave the KGB only a partial story o the 1961 events in London. 6001227 10 --- ## Page 246 14-00000 SECRET As previously indicated, the conclusion is there are a sufficient number of unresolved questions in the BELITSKIY case so that discrep- ancies between information from NOSENKO and the actual record in the BELITSKIY case cannot at present be considered as a reflection against NOSENKO, and there is a distinct possibility the KGB actually did not know the true facts of the BELITSKIY case. The previous summary noted on page 106 that Nataliya SHULGINA was an Intourist interpreter recruited by NOSENKO in 1955. It also noted that NOSENKO had stated Boris BELITSKIY "reported to the KGB that CIA had warned BELITSKIY against SHULGINA. " " The previous summary stated BELITSKIY reported to CIA that SHULGINA was a KGB agent and "CIA did not warn BELITSKIY." There appears to be no doubt at this time that the statement: by NOSENKO that BELITSKIY reported the "CIA had warned BELITSKIY against SHULGINA, " is a reasonably accurate description of what actually happened in May 1962 during Agency contacts with BELITSKIY in Geneva. The record reflects that BELITSKIY stated SHULGINA had confidentially told him of her status as a KGB agent, stating she had been doubled by the KGB after having been forcibly recruited by American Intelligence while previously in Paris, France. 6001228 11 SECRET --- ## Page 247 It was determined there was no collateral information which would indicate that the statement by SHULGINA had any factual basis and BELITSKIY was warned SHULGINA may have been acting on behalf of the KGB in stating to BELITSKIY she had been "forcibly recruited by American Intelligence" at a previous date. It was also suggested to BELITSKIY that he should go to the KGB as a loyal Soviet citizen and report the apparent indiscretion of SHULGINA. Pages 282 - 286 of the previous summary, in connection with the BELITSKIY case, made reference to Vladimir Lvovich ARTEMOV. It was stated that ARTEMOV had been involved with a series of American tourist agents in the Soviet Union and although NOSENKO was allegedly familiar with ARTEMOV, he was unaware of the involvement of ARTEMOV with American tourist agents in 1958 - 1959. The summary noted this was during a period when NOSENKO claimed to have been Deputy Chief of the American-British Commonwealth Section of the Seventh Depart- ment. Although not specifically stated, the above suggested ARTEMOV was actually in the Seventh Department in 1958 - 1959 and that NOSENKO not even aware ARTEMOV was in the Seventh Department. NOSENKO has consistently stated that ARTEMOV was assigned to the First Section, First Department, from the time he entered into the KGB in approxi- mately 1957. 0001229 SECRET --- ## Page 248 A closer examination of the cases described in the previous summary as "CIA American tourist agents," reveals there is no con- flict in the involvement of ARTEMOV in these cases and the statement by NOSENKO that ARTEMOV was with the First Section, First Depart- ment. As an example, one of the cases is the case of Edward McGOWAN. NOSENKO has furnished information concerning this case, stating it was originally a Seventh Department case and that after the mailing of a letter by the individual in Minsk, the case was immediately taken over by the First Department. There is adequate reason to believe ARTEMOV only became involved after the case was transferred to the First Department. Another of the cases involved the contact of ARTEMOV with a CIA) officer and visited the USSR on a tourist visa. Such an individual would under no circumstances be considered a true tourist or the responsibility of the Seventh Department, particularly since apparently the individual was even traveling under a diplomatic passport. It is assumed the individual was of interest to the First Chief Directorate and if the First Chief Directorate required or desired support from the SCD, it would normally request the First Department for such assistance and it is extremely un- likely that the FCD would request the Seventh Department for assistance in a case involving an American diplomat. 0001230 13 SECRET --- ## Page 249 Pages 332 - 333 of the previous summary contain the basis for the previous conclusion that the claim of NOSENKO that he was a Deputy Chief of the Seventa Department from July 1962 to January 1963 was not credible. It is considered that a detailed rebuttal is not necessary since this conclusion was apparently based on inadequate information. During current interviews, NOSENKO has furnished details concerning his duties and other aspects of his claimed position which substantiate his claim to having been a Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department from July 1962 to January 1964. An example in support of the statement that the previous conclu- sion was based on inadequate information is the matter of the written notes which NOSENKO brought out and furnished to CIA in early 1964. The description of these notes on page 319 of the previous summary is inadequate, inaccurate, and misleading. Prior to current interviews, an cffort had not been made to obtain from NOSENKO a detailed explan ation of his notes or of how be obtained the information in the notes. During current interviews, NOSENKO has given detailed informa- tion concerning all aspects of his notes. This information supports his claimed position of Deputy Chief of the Seventh Department and includes collateral support to his claim of being Deputy Chief of the First Section, First Department, iz 1960 - 1961. C001231 14 SECRET --- ## Page 250 14-00000 Primarily the notes of NOSENKO can be categorized as follows: (a). Short case summaries by the Chiefs of the First Section, Second Section and Sixth Section, Seventh Department. NOSENKO has stated that he was in 1962 - 1963 responsible for supervision over these Sections and that Filip Denisovich BOBKOV, Deputy Chief, SCD, who supervised the Seventh Department, requested a list of all recruited agents of the Seventh Department. According to NOSENKO, the order from BOBKOV was to only retain the files (cases) of agents in tourist firms and that the files of other recruited agents should be sent to the FCD or Archives. NOSENKO has stated that he in turn levied on the Chiefs of the three Sections the requirement of BOBKOV, but also ex- panded the request to include all 1960 - 1962 cases, not excluding previous cases or cases which had already been given to the FCD. The notes of NOSENKO included hand- written reports from the Chief or Acting Chief of each Section on recruited agents, with information varying from agent to agent and even including some human errors. Many of the above cases had previously been trans- ferred to the FCD, but the remarks of NOSENKO about thef001232 15 SECRET and i it inca --- ## Page 251 inclusion support his statement that he had expanded the original request from BOBKOV so that he would have some "pieces of information to give CIA. " (b) Notes by NOSENKO on other cases which he learned of during the 1962 - 1963 period. Certain of the notes were made from a review of a notebook kept by the Chief, Seventh Department, to which NOSENKO had access on at least two occasions. Most of his notes were not detailed but were sufficient to refresh the memory of NOSENKO at a later date and yet were somewhat innocuous to maintain before his defection. (c) Notes for lectures to officers of the Seventh Directorate prepared while with the First Department, 1960 - 1961, and the Seventh Department, 1962 - 1963. (d; Draft report for the briefing of the new Chief, First Department, in the latter part of 1961. (e) One of three copies of an unregistered report pre- pared by the Chief, Seventh Department, and two Deputy Chiefs, including NOSENKO. This was a briefing paper for use by the Chief (CHELNOKOV) in an appearance before the Collegium of the KGB which was reviewing the activities of the Seventh 16 SECRET 0001233 --- ## Page 252 SECRET Department. According to NOSENKO, the prepared report was never typed as a formal document. The view has been set forth that NOSENKO took undue risk in carrying written notes with him out of the Soviet Union. An examination of this material suggests that NOSENKO was using extreme care in collecting material and was not attempting to obtain documents, the possession of which might be incriminating or which if he had brought out would have been immediately missed. Instead, he collected a con- siderable amount of valuable information which he could bring out with little or no fear that a search of his effects in the KGB after his depart- ure for Geneva would disclose that certain material was missing. None of the material was registered and all could have previously been des- troyed by NOSENKO. The previous summary stated that NOSENKO brought three KGB documents to Geneva. These were typed papers but none was registered or actually accountable. The reference to three documents was to: (a) The draft report for the briefing of the Collegium which has been mentioned previously. (b) A typed two-page report on several cases. Actually a Chief of Section had typed his notes on cases instead of submitting in handwriting as the others did. 0001234 17 SECRET --- ## Page 253 (c) A second copy of a summary on a KGB agent. NOSENKO stated that there were two copies in the file kept by the Chief which he reviewed and that he kept one. Of interest is the fact that the copy was not a registered document and did not contain the usual information as to number of copies typed. 0001235 18 SECRET --- ## Page 254 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 255 14-00000 SECRET G. NOSENKO HAS NO VALID CLAIM TO CERTAINTY THAT THE KGB RECRUITED NO AMERICAN EMBASSY PERSONNEL BETWEEN 1953 AND HIS DEFECTION IN 1964 0001236 SECRET 0R0UP 1 Excleded tom zulematic damaradag acd dastassirigation --- ## Page 256 14-00000 ( G. NOSENKO has no valid claim to certainty that the KGB recruited no American Embassy personnel between 1953 and kis defection in 1964. (Previous conclusion) The conclusion in this summary is that NOSENKO is of the opinion that there were no KGB recruitments of United States Embassy personnel in Moscow between 1953 and December 1963 with the exception of "'ANDREY" (Dayle Wallis SMITH) and Herbert'HOWARD; who actually was a USIA) employee but did work part of the time in the Embassy. The question here is whether or not the expressed opinion of NOSENKO is sufficiently based on actual knowledge so that this opinion can be accepted as absolute evidence that there were no other KGB recruitments of Embassy personnel during this period of time. The only logical conclusion is that the opinion of NOSENKO cannot be accepted as absolute fact and, therefore, there is a possibility that a recruitment could bave occurred and NOSENKO not be aware in any way of the recruitment. This should in no way be interpreted as suggestion that NOSENKO could be lying, but rather that an unbiased observer without personal knowledge could and should be hesitant to accept the expressed opinion of NOSENKO in this particular area. actual basis for the stated opinion of NOSENKO 100120 examined and can be cited as follows. SECRET 66O67 1 1 Excluded irera automatic conagrading and écelescificallen --- ## Page 257 (a) During March 1953-late May 1955 NOSENKO was a case officer in the First Section, First Department, SCD. NOSENKO does not claim that he would have known the details concerning any recruitments (other than "ANDREY") in this period, but states if there had been he would have heard "something." (b) During late May 1955 to December 1959 NOSENKO was in the Seventh Department, not the First Department, but continued to have contact with certain officers in the First Section, First Department. NOSENKO is of the opinion that if there had been a recruitment in the United States Embassy during this period he would have heard "something" even though he would probably have learned few details. (c) During the January 1960-December 1961 period NOSENKO was Deputy Chief of the First Section, First Department, and he has made the categorical statement that there were no recruitments by the KGB of United States Embassy personnel during this period of time. He has also stated that if there had been any recruitments during the 1953-1959 period he is sure he would, during 1960-1961, have heard or learned some details of tp0) 01230 case or cases. There is merit to this contention by --- ## Page 258 'at ere to to stone da NOSENKO since the Chief of Section was Vladislav KOVSHUK who had been an officer of the First Depart- ment since 1953, actually working in the First Section except for the periods of time that he was in the United States to reactivate "ANDREY" in 1957-1958 and a period of time that he was Deputy Chief of the First Department (d) During 1962-1963 NOSENKO was again in the Seventh Department. However, he continued to maintain contact with certain officers of the First Section, First Department: in particular, Gennadiy I. GRYAZNOV, who succeeded NOSENKO as Deputy Chief of the First. Sectión, then became Chief of Section, and in the latter part of 1963 became a Deputy Chief of the First Department. According to NOSENKO his relationship with GRYAZNOV was sufficiently close during 1962-1963 that he is sure GRYAZNOV would have furnished NOSENKO some information in regard to any successful recruitments of United States Embassy personnel. NOSENKO pointed out that he learned of the existence of the Herbert HOWARD case from GRYAZNOV in 1962, although it was not until 1963 that NOSENKO beard the name. NOSENKO actually 0001239 3 SECRET --- ## Page 259 SECRET learned of the name when the Flest Section, Firat Department, needed the services of the Seventh Department (Third Section) in obtaining a rooms in a certain hotel for the Soviet girl friend of HOWARD. In goneral the above constitates the baats for the stated opinion Of NOSENKO that "ANDREY" and Hesbert HOWARD were the only succeseial KGB recraltments during 1953 - December 1963. It should be soted that there are no other identifled KGB recrultments during this period of time which would specifically refate the oplaion of NOSENKO. However, ba viow of the cited actual basta for the opialon of NOSENKO, acceptance of the opinion of NOSENKO as being an honest opinion should not be converted into a statement that it la absolute proof that another recruitment could not have occurred. NOSENKO may be completely correct in his opinion, but since NOSENKO was only in the First Department 1953 - 1955 and 1960 - 1961 his opinion that he would have heard "something" about a recrultment 1= 1953 - 1959 or 1962 - 1963 cannot be accepted as infallible. 0001240 SEGRET --- ## Page 260 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 261 SECRET v. ANNEX 0001241 CACA Excladed frant automat! down raring cod SECRET --- ## Page 262 14-00000 ANNEX The previous summary contained an Annex "A" and an Arnex "B" covering pages 316 - 435. Limited comments concerning Annex "A, " Statements of Soviet Officials About NOSENKO, and Annex "B, " Summaries of Cases Not Examined in Text, are attached. In addition, there is an Annex "C" to this summary which is entitled, "The Cherepanov Papers. " Attachments: Annex A Annex B Annex C SECRET Excused Mera cutorale 0001242 --- ## Page 263 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 264 14-00000 SECRET ANNEX B - SUMMARIES OF CASES NOT EXAMINED IN TEXT SECRET 6001243 Exclude i DH002237 SoJ --- ## Page 265 ANNEX B SUMMARIES OF CASES NOT EXAMINED IN TEXT Pages 399 - 435 of the previous summary contain summaries on the cases of 49 Americans who, according to information from NOSENKO, were of KGB interest, were approached by the KGB, or were actually recruited by the KGB. It was stated that these cases did not clearly relate to the specific KCB positions held at particular times by NOSENKO and thus could not be usefully employed in examining his claimed KGB service. The sourcing of these cases has been explored in detail during the current interviews with NOSENKO, and it is now possible to establish a certain relationship between these cases and certain claimed positions of NOSENKO in the KGB. It is the conclusion of this summary that any group of 49) cases, as well as all other cases concerning which NOSENKO has furnished information, must be fully considered, not necessarily for the importance or unimportance of the information, but to determine how NOSENKO claimed to have learned of the case and whether his statemenis con- cerning each identified case are supported by collateral information. These factors are important in assessing the overall validity of info=- mation from NOSENKO as well as being supporting evladlidis claimed positions in the KGB. ¡ Lichbas died saamatics carting aid --- ## Page 266 14-00000 ! To comment specifically on each of the 49 cases would require a very lengthy paper. Current interviews have developed pertinent additional information from NOSENKO in approximately 40 of the 49) cases. Of even more significance is the fact that NOSENKO has logically sourced his irformation in all except perhaps four cases. The indicated inability of NOSENKO to completely source all 49 of the cases is not considered significant, pasticularly since his having knowledge of all the cases is quite compatible with his claimad positions in the KGB. In addition, criticism of NOSENKO for not being able to source all of his information would be unreasonable since it makes no allowance for normal lapses of memory or failure to recali some- thing which was insignificant at the time it occurred. Without citing in detail any of the 49) cases, the ways in which NOSENKO learned of a number of the cases are considered important since there is a direct relationship to his claimed positions in the KGB during 1960 - January 1964, specifically the position of Deputy Chief, First Section, First Department, 1960 - 1961; Chief, First Section, Seventh Depariment, January - July 1962; and as Deputy Chief, Seventh Department, July 1962 - Januazy 1964. Certain examples of the above are as follows: 0001245 SECRET --- ## Page 267 14-00000 (a) NOSENKO learned of a number of the Seventa Department cases which had occurred in 1960 - 1961, as well as several 1958 - 1959 cases from notes prepared by the Chief or Acting Chief of the First Section, Second Section and Sixth Section in 1963. These notes were pre- pared at the request of NOSENKO who as a Deputy Chief, Seventh Department, was responsible for supervision of these three sections; and the request was actually an ex- pansion of the original request from BOBKOV, Deputy Chief of the SCD, for information on recruitments of the Seventh Department. NOSENKO brought with him in 1964 the notes prepared by the Chief or Acting Chief of the First Section, Second Section and Sixth Section and his knowledge of mary of the cases which had occurred prior to 1962, particularly 1960 - 1961, was limited to information contained in the notes. From these notes, NOSENKO had prepared his re- port tO BOBKOV eliminating those which were not applicable to the request. (0) NOSENKO learned of several 1962 - 1963 cases of the First Section, First Department, from Gennadiy I. GRYAZNOV who succeeded NOSENKO as Deputy Chief, 6001246 3 SEORET --- ## Page 268 14-00000 First Section, First Department. This information was furnished to NOSENKO primarily because of bis friendship with GRYAZNOV and not as the result of mutual operations. However, NOSENKO learned of certain oi the cases or was furnished additional details as a result of a request from the Seventh Department to the First Section, First Department, for assistance or vice versa. Certain of the 49 cases listed were cases of the Seventh Depart- ment prior to 1960 or in 1962 - 1963 waen NOSENKO was in the Seventh Department. Certain of the cases were cases in which the First Section, First Department, was involved prior to 1960 or 1960 - 1961. The knowledge of NOSENKO concerning these two groups of cases does not materially support his claimed positions in the First Department and Seventh Department, but does support his claimed assignment to the Seventh Department prior to 1960 and in 1962 - 1963, and kis claimed assignment to the First Department in 1960 - 1961. It is difficult to specifically comment concerning these 49ì cases since they do not fall into one or two specific categories. Instead, they constitute a rather motley group of cases remaining after completion of the detailed sections of the previous summary. Included are Fiist Department and Seventh Department cases covering a period of appioxi- mately five and one-half years. It should be noted, no?tor? fat the --- ## Page 269 ( explanation of NOSENKO concerning ais knowiedge oi tel 49) cases is both plausible and compatible with his claimed positions in tee First Departnent and Seventh Department during 1960 - Januacy 1964. 0001248 5 --- ## Page 270 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 271 SECRET ANNEX C - THE CHEREPANOV PAPERS 0001249 SECRET Excluded in carmala 22221 pota --- ## Page 272 SECRET ANNEX C THE CHER EPANOV PAPERS Pages 309 - 316 of the previous summary contain a description of the Cherepanov Papers, and how Aleksandr Nikolayevich CHEREPANOV passed a package oí documents to an American tourist in Moscow in early November 1963. The conclusion, however, was that the assertions of NOSENKO with respect to the CHEREPANOV case were not material to the claim of NOSENKO that he was Deputy Chief, Seventh Department, in late 1963. The definite relationship of the Cherepanov Papers to the bona fides of NOSENKO cannot be ignored and must be given specific consi eration. I CHEREPANOV was under KGB control when he passed the papers to the American tourist, or if the papers contain "deception information, " the bona fides of NOSENKO are subject to very serious question. NOSENKO had personal knowledge of CHEREPANOV who was, according to NOSENKO, an officer in the First Section, First Depaitment, SECRET 0001250 colded ten strato --- ## Page 273 during 1960 - mid-1961 when he was forced into retirement from the KGB. During the above period of time, NOSENKO claims to bave been Deputy Chief, First Section, although he does not claim to have had a direct supervisory responsibility over CHEREPANOV except in the absence of the Chief of Section, Vladislav KOVSHUK. NOSENKO also claims to have participated in the hunt for CHEREPANOV in December 1963. Consideration has previously been given to the theory that the Cherepanov Papers were passed to Americans by the KGB through CHEREPANOV to support the bona fides of NOSENKO. Tais ibeory seems to have little credibility since toe papers contain no information which would even support the claim of NOSENKO that he was in the First Section, First Department, 1960 - 1961. The papers also contain no information which would indicate there was even a Deputy Chief of the First Section during 1958 - 1960. Statements by NOSENKO are emphatic that CHEREPANOV was not under KGB control, that be passed the papers which it later developed he had taken from the First Section prior to his retirement because be was disgruntled with his treatment by the KGB, and that the action by CHEREPANOV caused consternation in the KGB. There is no collateral evidence which contradicts any of the statements by NOSENKO about CHEREPANOV. Further, there is 0001251 SECRET --- ## Page 274 To one i t noting in either the form or substance of the papers which provides a basis for suspicion as to their aubenticity. In addition, the form and substance of the papers aie in keeping with the description by NOSENKO of the day-to-day operation of the First Section, First Department. During current interviews, the CHEREPANOV case has been covered in detail with NOSENKO.. The Cherepanov Papers, waich were originally shown to NOSENKO in 1964 after his defection, have also been covered in detail on a separate item-by-item basis. Although NOSENKO does not claim to have specifically seen any particular item prior to 1964, his statements in regard to the various handwritings, types of notes, and drait memoranda leave no doubt that NOSENKO was very familiar with personnel in the First Section, First Depart- ment, and with First Department procedures. Certain additional research has been conducted in regard to the papers and a detailed analysis will be prepared at a later date. It should be noted that a considerable amount of personal judgmen ras been necessary in making an assessment of the Cherepanov Papers since there are no exemplars with which to compare any of the material. However, based on information developed thus fai, and there is no reason to believe additional work will alter the conclusion, there is not an adequate basis for an opinion that CHEREPANOV was under KGB control, thai the Cherepanor Papers contain "deceptive inúpriu 252" 3 --- ## Page 275 14-00000 or that the papers were other than the collection of material by a disgruntled employee which he very carefully selected or accumulated, toe removal of which would only bave constituted a minimal risk to CHEREPANOV. The entire Cherepanov Papers have been reviewed to determine if there is any information which could be considered "deceptive infor- mation" either by direct statement or implication. Two possible areas have been noted and given full considerati (a) There is no specific infd were any recruitments by the KGB sonnel in the United States Embas; nor is there any information sugge 1253 coded 08, stand be. Piratect American source 01 American age during that period of time. (b) PetI S. POPOV, a GRU get ok an extremely valuable CIA source from 1953 on, was, according to the papers, exposed to the KGB in January 1959 as a result of a letter mailing by George Payne WINTERS, JI. WINTERS was a CIA employee under passigned to the Embassy in Moscow. The letter, which was to POPOV, was obtained by the KGB after mailing by WINTERS and was a direci result of KGB surveillance of WINTERS. 0001253 --- ## Page 276 In regard to (a), the papers are only a rather minute part of the total papers prepared in the First Section during 1958 - 1960. The lack of any information in these papers which directly or indirectly indicates that the KGB made a recruitment of an American in the Embassy or had an American source in the Embassy during the 1958 - 1960 period is only a matter for consideration. It is not conclusive proof that a recruitment was not made or that an American source. did not exist. The papers do not contain a positive statement on either matter. In regard to (b), the quite specific information in the papers that Petr S. POPOV was uncovered by the KCB as a result of KGB surveillance on George Payne WINTERS, JI., who mailed a letter to POPOV. in January 1959, this information should be considered as possibly information of a deceptive nature unless an adequate explanation can be made for its presence in the papers. POPOV was recalled to Moscow from East Germany in November 1958 ostensibly for TDY. The circumstances under which be was recalled and collateral infor - mation have given adequate grounds for a belief that by November 1958 POPOV was suspected by the KGB of cooperating with Western Intelligence or that the KGB may even have been sure POPOV had been cooperating with United States Intelligence. It may be presumed that any lead to tae KGB in regard io POPOV or the fact that United Siates Intelligence, more spe 6001254 5 --- ## Page 277 14-00000 CIA, had a source in the GRU would have come from an agent or source of the FCD, KGB, not the SCD. It can also be presumed that a source or agent of the ECD in a position to furnish a lead to a penetration of the GRU by Western Intelligence would be carefully proiected even within the KGB. The possibility of course exists that a lead from George BLAKE, an FCD agent, resulted in toe exposure of POPOV to the KGB, but it is not established that it did nor is there any reason to believe the FCD could not or did not have another agent or agents who furnished information to the KGB pertinent to develop- ment of the case against POPOV. The primary question, however, as regards the Cherepanov Papers is whether, even if it is presumed the KGB obtained information from an FCD source or agent which led to suspicion of POPOV or identification of POPOV, this would be incompatible with information in the papers and could only lead to the conclusion that the papers contain "deceptive information." The conclusion in regard to the above is that the faci the papers attribute the exposure of POPOV to the KGB to surveillance on WINTERS when he mailed the letter to POPOV in January 1959 is not incompatible with the distinct possibility that the KGB had previously obtained infor- mation from an ECD agent oi agents which actually led to suspicion in regard to POPOV or actual identification of POPOV. 0001255 SECRET --- ## Page 278 It information was received from an important ECD agent such as George BLAKE or through another valuable FCD agent which led to KGB suspicion of POPOV priot to bis return to Moscow in November 1958, it is highly unlikely such information would receive wide distribution within the KGB, either in the FCD or the SCD. It is also possible the limited group within the KGB who would be aware that the KGB had received information leading to suspicion of POPOV from a valuable agent would be very interested in attributing the exposure of POPOV to the fortuitous mailing of the letter to POPOV by WINTERS. The possibility should be considered that prior to the retrieval by the KGB of the letter to POPOV there was only a deep suspicion of POPOV but that the letter completely solidified the case against POPOV. Consideration has been given to the possibility that CHERZPANOV was under KGB control when he passed the papers to the American tourist and that it was done by the KGB with the hope of involving CIA in a KGB-controlled operation within the USSR. In that event, the papers passed by CHEREPANOV would most likely be genuine since this would have been the initial step in what the KGB hoped would become successful operation., The above theory has been rejected since there are a number of factors which militate against it. These factors include the fact that 0001256 --- ## Page 279 ine latest irformation in the papers was at least three years old, which world indicate CHEREPANOV had no current access and there was no indication CHEREPANCV Was interested in a future contact. 0001257 8 SCAPE --- ## Page 280 *No text recognized on this page.* --- ## Page 281 td-innod SECRET INDEX ABIDIAN, John - IV, E, 5, 7-15,19,20, 52 "ANDREY" (Dayle Wallis SMITH) - IV, G, 1-4 ARTAMONOV, Nikolay - III, A, 2 ARTEMOV, Vladimir Lvovich - IV, F, 6, 12, 13 BAKHVALOV, Mikbail - IV, E, 3, 4 BALDIN, Boris Andreyevich - IV,F, 2 BARRETT, Robert - II, F, 14, 15 BEGGS, Frank) - IV, E, 36,37 BELITSKIY, Boris - IV, F, 6-12 BERIYA, Lavrentiy Ivanovich - IV, B, 2,3,5-7 BIENSTOCK, Natalie) - IV, F, 3, 4 (BIRSE, Arthuy - IV, D, 1,2 BLAKE, George - IV, D, 9; IV, F, 9; V, C, 6,7 BOBKOV, Filip Denisovich - IV, F, 15,16; V, B, 3 BOHLEN, Ambassador - II, F, 10 BOWDEN, Lewis - IV, E, 53, 54 BRAUNS, Horst)- IV, F, 3-6 BROWN, G. Stanley, - IV, E, 43 6001259 •. . SECRE: CRobe 1 Excledea trea zutamalic daer recing aad Gecirclticaina --- ## Page 282 BUGAYEVA, Ludmila - IV, F, 1 BURGI, Richard - IV, D, 1 BURTIN, Sipe - IV, E, 49,50 BURTIN, Will) - IV, E, 49, 50 CECCHI, Pietro - IV, E, 39, 40, 42 CHELNOKOV, Vladimir Dmitriyevich - IV, F, 2,16 CHEREPANOV, Aleksandr N. - III, H, 4; V, C, 1-4,6-8 CHERNETSEV, Y. E. - IV, E, 49 CHURANOV, Vladimir A. - II, B, 4 DAY, Frank - IV, E, 41,43 DEMKIN, Vladimir - IV, E, 20, 45 DERYABIN, Petr Sergeyevich - IV, B, 5,6 DOUGLAS, William O. - IV, D, 3 DREW, George - IV, D, 1 DWELLY, Robert - IV, E, 41, 44, 45 FARMAKOVSKAYA, Olga A. - V,A, 1 FEDOROVICH, Tatyana - IV, E, 8,9 FEDOSEYEV, Sergey M. - IV, E, 49-51; IV, F, 1 (FISK, Norman - IV, D, 5 FRIPPEL, Arsene) - IV, D, 2 (GAFFEY, Joseph) - IV, E, 41, 45, 46 2 0001259 --- ## Page 283 SECRET GARBLER, Paul - IV, E, 52 (GARCIA, Anthony A. - IV, E, 39 GARLAND, John - III, F, 17; IV, E, 31, 33-36 (GINSBURG, Michael - IV, D, 5, 6 GOLITSYN, Anatoliy Mikhaylovich - II, B, 3, 4; III, E, 9-11; III, F, 5-13, 15-19; IV, B, 5,6; IV, D,9,10; IV, E, 21,23, 31-34; V, A, 1 GRIBANOV, Oleg M. - II, F, 3,4; IV, 6; IV, 6; IV, E, 4,5,21; IV, E, 1,2 "GRIGORIY" - III, F, 13; IV, D, 3,6; IV,F, 4 GROMAKOVSKIY, Yevgeniy - III, B, 4; IV, E, 20 GRYAZNOV, Gennadiy I. - III, B, 4; II, F, 8-13,15; IV, E, 5,12, 19-21, 26-28, 30,43-45; IV, G,3; V,B, 3,4 GUK, Yuriy I. - II, B, 4 HAMILTON, Victor Norris - III, E, 9 (aka: HINDAL, Fouzi Mitri) "HANNA" - IV, E, 27 HARRIS, Gisella - IV, D, 1, 7, 8 HORBALY, William - IV, E, 53 HOWARD, Herbert) - III, E, 8; II, F, 20; IV, G, 1,3,4 IVANOVA, Svetlana - IV, E, 38, 39, 45, 46 'JENNER, Paul) - IV, E, 28-31, 35-36 JOHNSON, Robert Lee - III, E, 8; III, G, 5 (JOHNSON, Wallace Everett) - IV, F, 3,4 JONES, William Carroll'-IV,F, 3,4' 0001280 3 SECRET --- ## Page 284 cd-idonor SECRET KADERA, Fred - IV, E, 45 KANTOR, Marvin - IV, D, 5, 6 (KARLOV, fnu' - IV, D,5 KASHPEROV, Mikhail - II, H, 4 KENMER, Myra - IV, E, 9 KEYSERS, James - IV, E, 22-26, 55, 56: KLYPIN, Vladimir Alekseyevich - IV, E, 5, 48-51 KOBULOV, Bogdan Zakharovich (General) - IV, B, 1-4,7 KOLOSSOV, Viktor - IV, E, 30, 34 (Alias used by KOSOLAPOV) KOSOLAPOV, Vadim V. - III, B, 4; II, F, 8, 16, 17; IV, E, 5, 19-21, 28-32, 34-39,42-44 KOSYGINA, Madame - III, A, 1 KOVSHUK, Vladislav M. - II,B, 4; Ш,Е,5,11, 12; IV, E, 3, 4, 6, 12, 18, 21, 23,49,52,53; IV, F, 1,2; IV, G, 3; V, C,2 KOZLOV, Veniamin - IV, E, 12 KRUGLOV, Sergey Nikiforovich - IV, B, 5 LANE, Allen) - IV, D, 1, 2 LANGELLE, Russell - II, F, 3; IV, E, 8 "LILLIAN" - IV, E, 26 (LUBIN, George) - IV, E, 49,50 LUNI, Horace) - III, E, 3 MAHONEY, Eugene - IV, E, 53 0001261 MALIA, Martin) - IV, D, 2 4 SEORET --- ## Page 285 SECRET MARK, David - III, C, 4 MATLAW, Ralph - IV, D, 5 MERTENS, Gerard - IV, D, 2 MIKHAYLOV, A. A, - IV, E, 49 MINIKENBAUGH, James Allen - ILI, E, 8; II, G, 5 MORELL, William N. - IV, E, 52 MORONE, Joseph' - IV, E, 22, 27, 36, 37,39, 40, 55 MULE, Walter (Capt.) - IV, C, 4 (MC GOWAN, Edward) - IV, F, 13 PECHTER, Bernard - IV, D, 5,6 PENKOVSKIY, Oleg Vasilyevich - IV, E, 13 PETROV, Vladimir Ivanovich - III, B, 4; IV, E, 48, 49 POPOV, Petr S. - IV, E, 7, 10; V, C/4-7 PREISFREUND, Johan) - III, F, 5, 11, 12 PRESSMAN, Patrick - IV, D, 5,7 "RAKETA" - IV, C, 5 RASTVOROV, Yuriy - IV, B, 5, 6 RHODES, Roy - III, E, 4 RUFE, John - IV, D, 5,6 SCHWARZENBACH, Collette - III, F, 10 5 SECRET 0001262 --- ## Page 286 SERGEYEV (SERGEEV), FNU - IV, E, 32, 33 (Very possibly Igor Alekseyevich ZENKIN, but is now considered also identical to Igor Alekseyevich SERGEYEV, Igor Alekseyevich SUKHOV and very possibly Igor A. SMIRNOV.) (SHAPIRO, Isaac Henry - III, F, 6 SHATTAUER, Sofia - IV, D, 5,7 SHAZLY, Sarwat el - IV, E, 40 SHELEPIN, Aleksandr Nikolayevich - II, F, 13 "SHMELEY" - II, F, 13; IV, D, 3, 6; IV, F, 4 SHUBIN, Jobn - IV, D, IL = SHULGINA, Nataliya - IV, F, l1, 12 SMITH, Dayle Wallis - II, F, 4, 20; IV, G, 1 SMITH, Edward Ellis - III, F, 4 SMITH, John Discoe' - ILI, E, 9; IV, E, 49, 50 STALIN - IV, B, 5 STEVENS, Edmund - II, F, 4,6 'STORSBERG, James - III, F, 3,5,11-13; IV, E, 21-24, 26, 43, 55, 56 TARASKA, William - IV, D, 5, 6 TAYLOR, David - IV, D, 2 TAYLOR, John - IV, E, 42, 43 UMANETS, Ella - IV, E, 38 6001262 6 SECREI --- ## Page 287 SEO.21 (URBAN, (Colonel); - IV, E, 24, 25 VASSALL, William - III, E, 9; IL, G, 5; IV, D, 9 WASHENKO, Steve - IV, Ei, 53 WILBY, William Stanley - IV, D, 2 WINTERS, George Payne, Jr. - IV, E,, 53; V, C, 4-7 ZENKIN, FNU - IV, E, 32-34 (Very possibly Igor Alekseyevich ZENKIN, but is now considered also identical to Igor Alekseyevich SERGEYEV, Igor Alekseyevich SUKHOV and very possibly Igor A. SMIRNOV.) ZUJUS, Matthew) - IV, E, 26-28 ZWANG, Maurice - IV, E, 40-42 7 0001264 SECRET ---
2,018
/releases/2018
104-10167-10405.pdf
104-10167-10405
04/26/2018
Redact
CIA
09/15/1966
PAPER-TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
80T01357A
DIRECTOR
CABLE RE TRANSFER OF ITEMS (EXPLOSIVES).
1
CIA
JFK
3/12/18
JFK64-6 : F14 : 1998.02.05.17:30:46:373031 :
1
## Page 1 104-10167-10405 RETURN TO CIAY Background Use Ohly Do Not Reproduce CLISSIFAED MISSACE SECRET PERSON/UNIS NOTIFIEO cies te FEPECDUCTION PROMENAR MO- RES. TO ERANCH O DISTaOr Ds16. ACTIGH SIStEN BY 30/2 Just p & RID COPY FILE, VI LOGS 4, SUDG, WH8, ADVANCE CODY S= 02 F T 1525222 CITE JUAVE 3344 DIRECTOR I"FO JMEAS TYPiC INCEDRICK REF: DIRECIOR 34535 pesget 1. LOCAL LIYAPA STAIES TRANSFER OF REF ITEMS (EXCEPI GRENADES--ALL EXPLOSIVES ALREADY DISPOSED OF). CAN BE ARRANGED BY SHAVE ZEMO TO LOCAL LNYAPA• 2. HOVEVEP LYYAPA CANSO! PELEASE UNTIL EARLY OCTOBEP., WHEN MATERIAL WILL 3E FOPFEITED TO G.S. GOVI IN ABSENCE PETITION FROY INDIVIDUALS FROM WHOM IT WAS SEIZED. 3. HILL ADVISE WHEN MATEFIAL ACQUIRED. SECRET 96922 SECRET 03 a copy of this menage to acto requived ---