Datasets:
🚩 Report: Copyright infringement
This data set includes my copyright-protected information, and was created without my consent. It includes all works from https://archiveofourown.org/users/sofreakinmanyfandoms/works created on or before February 17, 2025, within it; some titles include "Physical Fan Art", "No Conditions, No Reservations", and "Selina's Stray".
You do not own the copyright to naruto, one piece, and the various other infringing derivative works hosted on AO3. Fanfiction violates copyright, and it holds no copyright of it's own. Abusing DMCA for this purpose is despicable.
You do not own the copyright to naruto, one piece, and the various other infringing derivative works hosted on AO3. Fanfiction violates copyright, and it holds no copyright of it's own. Abusing DMCA for this purpose is despicable.
Fanfiction does NOT violate copyright, and it IS protected. That's why it's protected by the DMCA. Check your facts, you gross af sock puppet.
Fanfic authors hold the rights to their fanworks, not to the original IP, and it is our fanworks that were used. In addition, datasets like this are used to train AI, which are then used for profit--meaning it is the AI and the dataset that are violating copyright, on multiple levels.
Training an AI on a copyrighted fanfic does not create a derivative work, neither does archiving content from the work. If you want to come in here and yap about data that you published to the public internet being put on the public internet then I expect you apply the same logic to go dogpile Archive.org as well ^^
Training an AI on a copyrighted fanfic does not create a derivative work, neither does archiving content from the work. If you want to come in here and yap about data that you published to the public internet being put on the public internet then I expect you apply the same logic to go dogpile Archive.org as well ^^
That...is not the same thing. The Wayback isn't compiled to train AI. It's for archival purposes, like AO3 itself.
Can you really not tell the difference between "archived for historical purposes and public use" and "training a machine to profit the company or person that uses said machine"?
I can absolutely tell the difference between the two intents. The legal system intentionally does not.
Could you point me to a for-profit model being trained on this dataset?
I can point you to several that are trained on the Internet Archive's copy of your works. Most major trainers use data derived from the Internet Archive's data.