Dataset Viewer
question
stringlengths 1.27k
1.36k
| answer
bool 2
classes | qwen14b_answer
stringlengths 65
1.37k
| annotations
float64 0
1
⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can members of the Green Party of England and Wales vote in the USA?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that the Green Party of England and Wales is a political party based in the United Kingdom.
- Step 2: Determine that voting rights in the USA are restricted to citizens of the United States.
- Step 3: Establish that members of the Green Party of England and Wales are citizens of the United Kingdom, not the United States.
- Step 4: Conclude that non-US citizens are not eligible to vote in US elections.
<Answer>: No, members of the Green Party of England and Wales cannot vote in the USA because they are not US citizens.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do depressed people travel to the Golden Gate Bridge often?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
Answer: No, depressed people do not travel to the Golden Gate Bridge often.
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do some people soak in olive oil and water?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Consider common practices involving olive oil and water for health or beauty purposes.
- Step 2: Identify that some people use olive oil in baths for moisturizing or therapeutic benefits.
- Step 3: Recognize that adding water to olive oil creates a mixture that can be used for soaking.
- Step 4: Conclude that yes, some people do soak in olive oil and water mixtures for various reasons.
<Answer>: Yes, some people soak in olive oil and water mixtures for moisturizing, therapeutic, or beauty purposes.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Could a wandering albatross fly from Bucharest to New York City without a rest?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Determine the approximate distance between Bucharest and New York City which is about 5,900 kilometers.
- Step 2: Identify the maximum non-stop flight distance of a wandering albatross which is approximately 10,000 kilometers.
- Step 3: Compare the distance between Bucharest and New York City with the maximum non-stop flight distance of a wandering albatross.
- Step 4: Conclude that since the distance between Bucharest and New York City is less than the maximum non-stop flight distance of a wandering albatross, it is theoretically possible for the bird to fly without rest.
<Answer>: Yes, a wandering albatross could theoretically fly from Bucharest to New York City without a rest.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Are Durian fruits an olfactory delight?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that the question is asking whether Durian fruits are considered an olfactory delight based on their smell.
- Step 2: Note that Durian fruits are known for having a strong, pungent odor that is often described as unpleasant or overpowering.
- Step 3: Recognize that the term "olfactory delight" refers to a pleasant or enjoyable smell.
- Step 4: Conclude that since the smell of Durian is generally not considered pleasant, it cannot be classified as an olfactory delight.
<Answer>: No, Durian fruits are not considered an olfactory delight due to their strong and often unpleasant odor.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can Aerosmith legally drive in the carpool lane?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Determine the legal definition of a carpool lane which typically requires a minimum number of occupants in the vehicle.
- Step 2: Identify the number of people in Aerosmith's vehicle assuming they are all present.
- Step 3: Aerosmith consists of four members so the vehicle would have four occupants.
- Step 4: Most carpool lanes require at least two occupants to qualify for use.
- Step 5: Since Aerosmith's vehicle would have four occupants, it meets the minimum requirement for a carpool lane.
- Step 6: Confirm that there are no additional restrictions or exceptions that would prevent Aerosmith from using the carpool lane.
- Step 7: There is no indication of any restrictions or exceptions that would apply to Aerosmith specifically.
<Answer>: Yes, Aerosmith can legally drive in the carpool lane as their vehicle would have four occupants, meeting or exceeding the minimum requirement of two occupants for carpool lanes.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can petroleum jelly be used as fuel in a car?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the primary components of petroleum jelly which are hydrocarbons.
- Step 2: Determine that petroleum jelly is a semi-solid mixture of hydrocarbons derived from petroleum.
- Step 3: Recognize that internal combustion engines require a volatile fuel that can be easily vaporized and combusted.
- Step 4: Note that petroleum jelly has a high viscosity and low volatility compared to liquid fuels like gasoline.
- Step 5: Conclude that the physical properties of petroleum jelly make it unsuitable for use in standard internal combustion engines.
- Step 6: Acknowledge that specialized equipment might be required to use petroleum jelly as a fuel source, but it is not practical for standard cars.
<Answer>: No, petroleum jelly cannot be used as fuel in a standard car because its high viscosity and low volatility make it unsuitable for combustion in internal combustion engines.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does the New York Public Library sell Alpo products?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that the New York Public Library is a public library system and primarily functions as a repository for books, media, and other educational resources.
- Step 2: Determine that the primary purpose of the New York Public Library does not include selling consumer products such as pet food.
- Step 3: Confirm that Alpo is a brand of pet food and is typically sold in retail stores, not in libraries.
- Step 4: Conclude that the New York Public Library does not sell Alpo products as it does not engage in retail sales of consumer goods.
<Answer>: No, the New York Public Library does not sell Alpo products.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do spider wasps have eight legs?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that spider wasps belong to the family Pompilidae.
- Step 2: Determine that spider wasps are a type of wasp.
- Step 3: Recall that all wasps are insects.
- Step 4: Remember that all insects have six legs.
- Step 5: Conclude that spider wasps, being insects, have six legs.
<Answer>: No, spider wasps do not have eight legs; they have six legs.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is Newt Gingrich's nickname a type of Reptile?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify Newt Gingrich's nickname which is "Newt."
- Step 2: Determine if "Newt" is a type of reptile by checking common reptile species names.
- Step 3: Find that "Newt" refers to a type of salamander which is an amphibian not a reptile.
- Step 4: Conclude that Newt Gingrich's nickname is not a type of reptile.
<Answer>: No
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do you need both hot and cold water to peel a tomato?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Determine if peeling a tomato requires hot water by considering that hot water can soften the skin of the tomato making it easier to peel.
- Step 2: Determine if peeling a tomato requires cold water by considering that cold water can be used to cool the tomato after it has been softened by hot water or to prevent it from becoming too soft.
- Step 3: Consider alternative methods of peeling a tomato such as using a knife or boiling the tomato in hot water without cold water.
- Step 4: Conclude that while hot water is typically used to soften the skin for easier peeling, cold water is not strictly necessary as the peeling can be done with just hot water or other methods.
<Answer>: No, you do not need both hot and cold water to peel a tomato. Hot water is typically used to soften the skin for easier peeling, but cold water is not strictly necessary.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is Tony Bennett's middle name shared by a former UFC champion?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify Tony Bennett's full name which is Anthony Tony Bennett
- Step 2: Determine Tony Bennett's middle name which is Tony
- Step 3: Search for a former UFC champion named Tony
- Step 4: Identify that Tony Ferguson is a former UFC champion
- Step 5: Confirm that Tony Ferguson's name includes the middle name Tony
<Answer>: Yes
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does 2015 have more unlucky Friday's than usual?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Define an "unlucky Friday" as a Friday the 13th.
- Step 2: Determine how many Friday the 13ths occur in the year 2015.
- Step 3: Check the calendar for 2015 and find that there are 2 Friday the 13ths in 2015, specifically in February and March.
- Step 4: Determine the average number of Friday the 13ths in a year, which is approximately 1.333.
- Step 5: Compare the number of Friday the 13ths in 2015 (2) to the average (1.333).
- Step 6: Conclude that 2015 has more Friday the 13ths than the average.
<Answer>: Yes, 2015 has more unlucky Friday's than usual.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did Jesus know anyone who spoke Estonian?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the time period during which Jesus is believed to have lived, which is approximately 4 BCE to 30 CE.
- Step 2: Determine the historical presence of Estonian language and its speakers. Estonian is a Finno-Ugric language that developed in the region of present-day Estonia, which was inhabited by Finno-Ugric peoples long before the Common Era.
- Step 3: Recognize that the Estonian language as a distinct and identifiable language did not exist during the time of Jesus; it evolved much later, with the earliest written records appearing in the 16th century.
- Step 4: Acknowledge that the population of the region that is now Estonia during Jesus's time would have spoken Proto-Finnic or other related languages, not Estonian.
- Step 5: Conclude that Jesus could not have known anyone who spoke Estonian because the language did not exist in its modern form during his lifetime.
<Answer>: No, Jesus could not have known anyone who spoke Estonian because the Estonian language did not exist in its modern form during his lifetime.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would The Dark Knight be appropriate for a preschool class?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: Identify the content of The Dark Knight as a film featuring intense violence, themes of crime, and moral ambiguity.
- Step 2: Consider the typical age range of preschool classes as being between 3 to 5 years old.
- Step 3: Evaluate the psychological and emotional maturity of preschool children to handle violent or complex themes.
- Step 4: Assess the potential negative impact of exposing preschool children to intense or scary content.
- Step 5: Determine that The Dark Knight is not suitable for preschoolers due to its mature themes and graphic content.
<Answer>: No, The Dark Knight would not be appropriate for a preschool class.
<end of response>
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Are all limbs required for jujutsu?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the definition of jujutsu as a martial art that involves techniques such as throws, joint locks, and strikes.
- Step 2: Determine that jujutsu techniques can be executed using various body parts including hands, feet, elbows, knees, and even the head.
- Step 3: Note that some jujutsu techniques specifically require the use of limbs such as arms and legs for throws and joint locks.
- Step 4: Recognize that while limbs are commonly used in jujutsu, the core principles of jujutsu can be applied using body mechanics and leverage even if some limbs are not available.
- Step 5: Conclude that not all limbs are strictly required for practicing jujutsu as the art can be adapted to different physical conditions.
<Answer>: No, not all limbs are required for jujutsu as the art can be adapted to different physical conditions and utilizes body mechanics and leverage.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can you get a ride on Amtrak to the Underworld?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that Amtrak is a real-world transportation service operating in the United States.
- Step 2: Recognize that the Underworld is a fictional or mythological concept and not a physical location accessible by conventional transportation.
- Step 3: Determine that no Amtrak route exists to a fictional or mythological location such as the Underworld.
- Step 4: Conclude that it is not possible to get a ride on Amtrak to the Underworld.
<Answer>: No, you cannot get a ride on Amtrak to the Underworld because the Underworld is a fictional or mythological concept and not a physical destination accessible by Amtrak or any other real-world transportation service.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did Jackson 5 members exceed number in The Osmonds?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the number of members in Jackson 5 which is 5.
- Step 2: Identify the number of members in The Osmonds which is 4.
- Step 3: Compare the number of members in Jackson 5 to The Osmonds.
- Step 4: Determine that 5 exceeds 4.
<Answer>: Yes
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did Mickey Mouse appear in a cartoon with Bugs Bunny in 1930?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the debut year of Mickey Mouse which was 1928.
- Step 2: Identify the debut year of Bugs Bunny which was 1940.
- Step 3: Determine that since Bugs Bunny did not exist in 1930, he could not have appeared in a cartoon with Mickey Mouse in that year.
<Answer>: No
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is Isaac Newton buried at the same church as the author of Great Expectations?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the author of Great Expectations as Charles Dickens.
- Step 2: Determine that Charles Dickens is buried at Poets' Corner in Westminster Abbey.
- Step 3: Identify Isaac Newton as the person who formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation.
- Step 4: Determine that Isaac Newton is buried in Westminster Abbey.
- Step 5: Confirm that both Charles Dickens and Isaac Newton are buried in Westminster Abbey.
- Step 6: Conclude that Isaac Newton is buried at the same church as the author of Great Expectations.
<Answer>: Yes
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do most middle class families have butlers?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Define the term "middle class" as a socioeconomic group with a standard of living above the working class but below the upper class.
- Step 2: Identify that butlers are typically employed in households with significant wealth, often associated with the upper class or aristocracy.
- Step 3: Research statistical data on employment rates of butlers in middle-class households.
- Step 4: Find that butlers are rare in middle-class families due to the high cost of employing such staff.
- Step 5: Conclude that most middle-class families do not have butlers.
<Answer>: No, most middle class families do not have butlers.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is letter C crucial to spelling the two most common words in English language?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the two most common words in the English language as "the" and "be".
- Step 2: Check if the letter "C" is present in the word "the" which it is not.
- Step 3: Check if the letter "C" is present in the word "be" which it is not.
- Step 4: Conclude that the letter "C" is not present in either of the two most common words in the English language.
<Answer>: No
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is a felony jury enough people for a Bunco game?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Determine the standard number of players required for a Bunco game which is typically 6 to 12 players.
- Step 2: Identify the number of people on a felony jury which is typically 12 jurors in the United States.
- Step 3: Compare the number of jurors on a felony jury to the number of players required for a Bunco game and find that 12 jurors meet the upper limit of players needed for a Bunco game.
- Step 4: Conclude that a felony jury of 12 people is enough for a Bunco game as it meets the typical player requirement.
<Answer>: Yes, a felony jury of 12 people is enough for a Bunco game as it meets the typical player requirement of 6 to 12 players.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: In baseball, is a "Homer" named after the poet Homer who wrote the Odyssey?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the origin of the term "Homer" in baseball
- Step 2: Determine if the term "Homer" in baseball is related to the poet Homer
- Step 3: Research the etymology of the term "Homer" in baseball
- Step 4: Find that the term "Homer" in baseball refers to a home run
- Step 5: Determine that the term "Homer" in baseball originated from a player named Homer in the 19th century
- Step 6: Conclude that the term "Homer" in baseball is not named after the poet Homer who wrote the Odyssey
<Answer>: No, a "Homer" in baseball is not named after the poet Homer who wrote the Odyssey. The term "Homer" in baseball refers to a home run and originated from a player named Homer in the 19th century.
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does Kenny G hold the qualifications to be a tax collector?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the qualifications required to be a tax collector which typically include knowledge of tax laws, accounting skills, and sometimes a degree in finance or related fields.
- Step 2: Research Kenny G's background and profession which shows he is a saxophonist and musician known for his smooth jazz style.
- Step 3: Determine if Kenny G has any formal education or training in tax law, accounting, or related fields based on available public information.
- Step 4: Evaluate if Kenny G's professional experience as a musician provides any relevant qualifications for the role of a tax collector.
- Step 5: Conclude that based on available information, Kenny G does not hold the qualifications to be a tax collector as his expertise lies in music, not tax collection or related fields.
<Answer>: No, Kenny G does not hold the qualifications to be a tax collector.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do guitarists need both hands to play?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that playing the guitar typically involves plucking or strumming strings with one hand while pressing down on the frets with the other hand.
- Step 2: Note that the right hand (for right-handed players) is usually responsible for plucking or strumming the strings, while the left hand presses down on the frets to change the pitch of the notes.
- Step 3: Recognize that although some guitarists may use alternative techniques or one-handed playing styles, the standard method of playing the guitar requires the use of both hands.
- Step 4: Conclude that the majority of guitarists need both hands to play the instrument effectively.
<Answer>: Yes, guitarists typically need both hands to play the instrument, with one hand plucking or strumming the strings and the other hand pressing down on the frets.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Karachi was a part of Alexander the Great's success?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the historical period of Alexander the Great's conquests which occurred between 334 BCE and 323 BCE.
- Step 2: Determine the geographical location of Karachi which is in present-day Pakistan.
- Step 3: Examine historical records of Alexander the Great's campaigns to see if he extended his empire to the region of present-day Pakistan.
- Step 4: Confirm that Alexander the Great did not reach the area of present-day Karachi during his campaigns.
- Step 5: Conclude that Karachi was not part of Alexander the Great's success as he did not conquer or control the region.
<Answer>: No, Karachi was not a part of Alexander the Great's success as he did not conquer or control the region during his campaigns.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would a bodybuilder choose maize over chicken breast for dinner?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the primary nutritional goals of a bodybuilder which typically include high protein intake for muscle repair and growth.
- Step 2: Compare the protein content of chicken breast and maize, noting that chicken breast contains significantly more protein per serving than maize.
- Step 3: Consider the macronutrient profile of both foods, with chicken breast being a complete protein source and maize being primarily a carbohydrate source with lower protein content.
- Step 4: Evaluate the role of protein in muscle building and how it aligns with the dietary preferences of bodybuilders who prioritize protein-rich foods.
- Step 5: Conclude that a bodybuilder would likely choose chicken breast over maize for dinner due to its higher protein content and alignment with their fitness goals.
<Answer>: No, a bodybuilder would not choose maize over chicken breast for dinner because chicken breast provides significantly more protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Was King Kong (2005 film) the lead actress's biggest box office role?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the lead actress of the 2005 film King Kong which is Naomi Watts
- Step 2: Determine Naomi Watts's filmography including her roles and their respective box office earnings
- Step 3: Identify the highest-grossing film in Naomi Watts's career
- Step 4: Compare the box office earnings of King Kong (2005) with the highest-grossing film in Naomi Watts's career
- Step 5: Find that Naomi Watts's highest-grossing film is The Ring (2002) with a box office of approximately $126 million
- Step 6: Find that King Kong (2005) grossed approximately $218 million worldwide
- Step 7: Conclude that King Kong (2005) was the lead actress's biggest box office role
<Answer>: Yes
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Are some Do It Yourself projects potentially lethal?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that Do It Yourself (DIY) projects involve tasks that require tools, materials, and sometimes electrical or structural work.
- Step 2: Consider that improper use of power tools can lead to severe injuries such as cuts, amputations, or even death.
- Step 3: Recognize that electrical DIY projects, if not handled correctly, can result in electric shock or fire hazards.
- Step 4: Note that structural or heavy construction DIY projects may involve lifting heavy objects or working at heights, increasing the risk of falls or crushing injuries.
- Step 5: Acknowledge that some DIY projects, such as gas line installations or asbestos removal, require professional expertise and can be lethal if done incorrectly.
- Step 6: Conclude that due to the potential for serious injury or death from various hazards, some DIY projects are indeed potentially lethal.
<Answer>: Yes, some Do It Yourself projects can be potentially lethal due to risks such as improper use of power tools, electrical hazards, structural failures, and exposure to dangerous materials.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Has mummification in the Andes been prevented by rainfall?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the primary method of mummification in the Andes which involves natural desiccation due to high altitude and dry air.
- Step 2: Note that rainfall can increase humidity which may hinder the natural drying process essential for mummification.
- Step 3: Research historical and archaeological evidence of mummification in the Andes to determine if rainfall has impacted the process.
- Step 4: Find that mummification in the Andes has occurred despite varying rainfall levels due to the specific environmental conditions such as high altitude and cold temperatures.
- Step 5: Conclude that while rainfall may affect the rate or extent of mummification, it has not prevented it entirely in the Andes.
<Answer>: No, mummification in the Andes has not been prevented by rainfall. While rainfall can influence the process, the high altitude and cold temperatures in the region have allowed for natural mummification to occur despite varying levels of precipitation.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can lettuce result in spontaneous abortion?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the term "spontaneous abortion" as referring to the natural loss of a pregnancy before the 20th week.
- Step 2: Review the nutritional and chemical composition of lettuce to determine if it contains substances known to cause pregnancy loss.
- Step 3: Consult medical literature and scientific studies to determine if lettuce consumption has been associated with spontaneous abortion.
- Step 4: Consider the possibility of allergic reactions or sensitivities to lettuce that could theoretically cause complications during pregnancy.
- Step 5: Determine that no credible scientific evidence supports the claim that lettuce can cause spontaneous abortion.
- Step 6: Conclude that lettuce is not known to result in spontaneous abortion based on available medical and scientific information.
<Answer>: No, lettuce is not known to result in spontaneous abortion. There is no credible scientific evidence to support this claim.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is number of different US President's in 1800s a lucky number in Hong Kong?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the range of years in the 1800s as 1801 to 1900 inclusive.
- Step 2: Determine the US Presidents who served during the 1800s. This includes Presidents from 1801 to 1900.
- Step 3: Count the number of different US Presidents who served during the 1800s. This count is 22.
- Step 4: Identify the definition of a "lucky number" in Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, the lucky numbers are typically 8 and 3.
- Step 5: Check if the number 22 is considered a lucky number in Hong Kong. Since 22 does not contain the digits 8 or 3, it is not considered a lucky number in Hong Kong.
<Answer>: No
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do any video games about the end of civilization have slot machines?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify video games that are about the end of civilization.
- Step 2: Determine if any of these identified video games include slot machines as a gameplay element.
- Step 3: Review game descriptions and features of post-apocalyptic or civilization-ending games such as "Fallout," "The Last of Us," and "Metro 2033."
- Step 4: Confirm that none of these games feature slot machines as part of their core gameplay or narrative elements.
- Step 5: Consider if any lesser-known or niche games about the end of civilization might include slot machines.
- Step 6: Find no evidence of such games in available databases or reviews.
<Answer>: No, there are no known video games about the end of civilization that include slot machines as a gameplay element.
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would Terence Tao outperform Eminem in a math competition?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that Terence Tao is a mathematician known for his expertise in mathematics and has won prestigious awards such as the Fields Medal.
- Step 2: Identify that Eminem is a rapper and musician, not known for mathematical expertise or participation in math competitions.
- Step 3: Consider that math competitions typically require advanced problem-solving skills in mathematics, which are the domain of mathematicians like Terence Tao.
- Step 4: Conclude that Terence Tao would outperform Eminem in a math competition due to his specialized training and expertise in mathematics.
<Answer>: Yes
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does a person using tonsure have hair at the top of their scalp?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Tonsure refers to the practice of cutting or shaving a portion of the hair on the head, typically associated with religious or monastic traditions.
- Step 2: The specific pattern of tonsure varies across different religious traditions but commonly involves removing hair from the top of the scalp.
- Step 3: In many Christian traditions, the tonsure involves shaving a circle of hair from the top of the head, leaving a ring of hair around the sides.
- Step 4: Therefore, if a person undergoes a tonsure that involves shaving the top of the scalp, they would not have hair at the top of their scalp.
- Step 5: However, if the tonsure involves only trimming or partially removing hair, some hair may remain at the top of the scalp.
- Step 6: The question does not specify the type of tonsure, so the answer depends on the interpretation of the term.
- Step 7: In the most common interpretation of tonsure, particularly in religious contexts, hair is removed from the top of the scalp.
<Answer>: No, a person using tonsure typically does not have hair at the top of their scalp as the practice involves shaving that area.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would a black widow woman have use for peaches?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that the term "black widow" can refer to a woman who is described as a "black widow" in popular culture, typically meaning a woman who is perceived as dangerous or manipulative in relationships.
- Step 2: Consider that the term "black widow" can also refer to the spider species, Latrodectus mactans, which is known to prey on insects and is not associated with peaches.
- Step 3: Analyze the context of the question which appears to be about a human woman, not the spider.
- Step 4: Determine that the question is metaphorical or hypothetical, not literal, and is asking whether a woman described as a "black widow" would have a use for peaches.
- Step 5: Conclude that the question is not based on any known factual or biological relationship between a "black widow" woman and peaches, and thus cannot be answered definitively based on available information.
<Answer>: The question is metaphorical or hypothetical and does not have a definitive answer based on available information.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does someone from Japan need a passport to go to a Nordic country?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the Nordic countries as Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden.
- Step 2: Check the visa requirements for Japanese citizens traveling to the Nordic countries.
- Step 3: Determine if a passport is required for Japanese citizens entering the Nordic countries.
- Step 4: Confirm that Japanese citizens do not require a visa for short stays in the Nordic countries.
- Step 5: Conclude that a passport is required for Japanese citizens to travel to the Nordic countries as it is a standard entry document.
<Answer>: Yes, someone from Japan needs a passport to go to a Nordic country.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would you find a tibia beside parsley on a holiday plate?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the tibia as a bone found in the lower leg of animals.
- Step 2: Recognize parsley as a leafy green herb commonly used in cooking.
- Step 3: Consider typical holiday plates which usually contain cooked food items.
- Step 4: Note that bones are not typically served on plates as part of a meal.
- Step 5: Conclude that a tibia would not be found beside parsley on a holiday plate.
<Answer>: No
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did Hanuman ever experience an orgasm?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: Identify that Hanuman is a Hindu deity depicted in the Ramayana as a monkey-like figure known for his devotion and strength.
- Step 2: Note that Hanuman is considered an eternal and divine being, not bound by human biological functions.
- Step 3: Recognize that the concept of experiencing an orgasm is a biological and physiological human experience.
- Step 4: Conclude that Hanuman, as a divine entity, does not experience human biological functions such as an orgasm.
<Answer>: No, Hanuman, being a divine entity, does not experience human biological functions such as an orgasm.
<end of response>
| null |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Could someone listen to the entire U2 debut studio album during an episode of Peppa Pig?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Determine the runtime of the U2 debut studio album "Boy" which is 38 minutes and 39 seconds.
- Step 2: Determine the average runtime of an episode of Peppa Pig which is approximately 5 minutes.
- Step 3: Calculate how many Peppa Pig episodes would be needed to match the runtime of the U2 album by dividing 38 minutes and 39 seconds by 5 minutes per episode which results in approximately 7.78 episodes.
- Step 4: Since an episode of Peppa Pig is typically a single continuous segment, it is not possible to listen to the entire U2 debut studio album during a single episode of Peppa Pig.
<Answer>: No, someone could not listen to the entire U2 debut studio album during an episode of Peppa Pig because the album's runtime exceeds the typical duration of a single episode.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would Brian Warner be a good singer for a soul music band?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify Brian Warner as the lead vocalist of the band Thursday, known for emo and post-hardcore music.
- Step 2: Analyze the vocal style of Brian Warner, characterized by emotional intensity and a dynamic range suitable for rock and alternative genres.
- Step 3: Compare the vocal style of Brian Warner with the typical requirements of soul music, which often emphasizes smoothness, warmth, and melodic phrasing.
- Step 4: Determine that Brian Warner's vocal style is not aligned with the traditional characteristics of soul music.
- Step 5: Conclude that Brian Warner would likely not be a good fit as a singer for a soul music band due to the mismatch in vocal style and genre expectations.
<Answer>: No, Brian Warner would not be a good singer for a soul music band.
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would three commas be sufficient for displaying US 2018 GDP?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the value of the US 2018 GDP as approximately 20.54 trillion dollars.
- Step 2: Convert the value to standard numerical form as 20540000000000.
- Step 3: Determine the number of commas required for proper formatting by counting the digits in groups of three starting from the right.
- Step 4: Insert commas into the number 20540000000000 to get 20,540,000,000,000.
- Step 5: Count the number of commas used in the formatted number 20,540,000,000,000 which is three.
<Answer>: Yes
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can a person who knows only English read Kanji?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that Kanji is a logographic writing system used primarily in Japanese and Chinese.
- Step 2: Recognize that Kanji characters represent words or morphemes rather than phonetic sounds.
- Step 3: Determine that knowledge of English does not inherently include knowledge of Kanji characters.
- Step 4: Conclude that a person who knows only English would not be able to read Kanji without additional learning.
<Answer>: No, a person who knows only English cannot read Kanji without additional learning.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Was Walt Disney able to email his illustrations to people living far away?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the time period during which Walt Disney was active as an illustrator and animator.
- Step 2: Determine the availability of email technology during Walt Disney's lifetime.
- Step 3: Note that Walt Disney was born on December 5, 1901, and died on December 15, 1966.
- Step 4: Recognize that email technology was not developed until the 1970s, long after Walt Disney's death.
- Step 5: Conclude that Walt Disney was not able to email his illustrations to people living far away because email did not exist during his lifetime.
<Answer>: No, Walt Disney was not able to email his illustrations to people living far away because email technology did not exist during his lifetime.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Could Katharine Hepburn have ridden the AirTrain JFK?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the operational dates of the AirTrain JFK as from December 15, 2003, onwards.
- Step 2: Determine Katharine Hepburn's birth date as May 12, 1907, and her death date as June 30, 2003.
- Step 3: Calculate that Katharine Hepburn passed away on June 30, 2003, which is prior to the AirTrain JFK's operational start date of December 15, 2003.
- Step 4: Conclude that Katharine Hepburn could not have ridden the AirTrain JFK because she died before it became operational.
<Answer>: No, Katharine Hepburn could not have ridden the AirTrain JFK because she died on June 30, 2003, before the AirTrain JFK began operations on December 15, 2003.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Was Great Recession the period of severest unemployment?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the timeframe of the Great Recession as 2007 to 2009.
- Step 2: Determine the peak unemployment rate during the Great Recession as 10.0% in October 2009.
- Step 3: Identify other periods in U.S. history with higher unemployment rates such as the Great Depression.
- Step 4: Determine the peak unemployment rate during the Great Depression as 24.9% in 1933.
- Step 5: Compare the unemployment rates of the Great Recession with those of the Great Depression.
- Step 6: Conclude that the Great Depression had a much higher unemployment rate than the Great Recession.
<Answer>: No, the Great Recession was not the period of severest unemployment; the Great Depression had a much higher unemployment rate, reaching 24.9% in 1933, compared to the peak of 10.0% during the Great Recession.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: At Christmastime, do some films remind us that groundhog day is approaching?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that Christmastime occurs in December.
- Step 2: Recognize that Groundhog Day is celebrated on February 2nd.
- Step 3: Note that February 2nd occurs after December.
- Step 4: Conclude that films shown at Christmastime are not about Groundhog Day as it has not yet occurred.
<Answer>: No.
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would Michael Phelps be good at pearl hunting?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify Michael Phelps' primary skills as an Olympic swimmer specializing in freestyle and butterfly strokes.
- Step 2: Determine that pearl hunting involves diving, underwater navigation, and retrieving pearls from oyster beds or shells.
- Step 3: Assess that pearl hunting requires physical endurance, breath-holding ability, and knowledge of marine environments.
- Step 4: Compare Phelps' physical capabilities such as lung capacity and swimming endurance to the requirements of pearl hunting.
- Step 5: Conclude that while Phelps has exceptional swimming skills, pearl hunting involves specific techniques and knowledge not typically part of competitive swimming.
- Step 6: Determine that Phelps would likely have the physical ability to excel in the swimming aspect of pearl hunting but may lack the specialized training and knowledge required for the full activity.
<Answer>: Michael Phelps would likely have the physical ability to excel in the swimming aspect of pearl hunting due to his exceptional swimming skills, but he may lack the specialized training and knowledge required for the full activity.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do hornets provide meaningful data for oceanographers?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the primary field of study for oceanographers which is the ocean and its related phenomena.
- Step 2: Determine the typical subjects of study for hornets which are insects known for their nests and stings.
- Step 3: Assess whether the behavior, biology, or environmental impact of hornets has any direct relevance to oceanographic research.
- Step 4: Consider if hornets are found in marine environments or if their presence affects oceanic processes.
- Step 5: Evaluate if any scientific studies have linked hornets to oceanographic data or research outcomes.
- Step 6: Conclude based on the lack of direct connection between hornets and oceanographic data.
<Answer>: No, hornets do not provide meaningful data for oceanographers.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is 500GB USB device enough to save 10 hours of Netflix shows a day?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Determine the average video quality of Netflix shows which is typically 1.5 GB per hour for HD quality.
- Step 2: Calculate the total data required for 10 hours of Netflix shows by multiplying 1.5 GB by 10 which equals 15 GB.
- Step 3: Compare the total data required for 10 hours of Netflix shows (15 GB) with the storage capacity of the USB device (500 GB).
- Step 4: Determine that 500 GB is significantly larger than 15 GB which means the USB device can store more than enough data for 10 hours of Netflix shows.
<Answer>: Yes, a 500GB USB device is enough to save 10 hours of Netflix shows a day.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can COVID-19 spread to maritime pilots?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that maritime pilots are individuals who guide ships into and out of ports and are typically on board vessels.
- Step 2: Recognize that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, spreads primarily through respiratory droplets and aerosols.
- Step 3: Determine that close contact with infected individuals, especially in enclosed spaces, increases the risk of transmission.
- Step 4: Note that maritime pilots often work in close proximity to crew members and may share living quarters or workspaces on ships.
- Step 5: Confirm that there have been documented cases of COVID-19 outbreaks on ships, including cruise ships and cargo vessels.
- Step 6: Conclude that maritime pilots are at risk of contracting COVID-19 due to their working environment and potential exposure to infected individuals.
<Answer>: Yes, COVID-19 can spread to maritime pilots due to their close contact with crew members and the enclosed environments they work in, which increase the risk of transmission.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Could B be mistaken for an Arabic numeral?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the character B and its visual form
- Step 2: Compare the visual form of B with Arabic numerals
- Step 3: Note that the Arabic numeral 6 can resemble a stylized B in certain fonts
- Step 4: Recognize that the letter B and the numeral 6 share similar curved shapes
- Step 5: Conclude that in some contexts and fonts, B could be mistaken for the numeral 6
<Answer>: Yes, B could be mistaken for the Arabic numeral 6 in certain fonts or stylizations.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did occupants of Vellore Fort need to defend themselves from Grizzly Bears?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the location of Vellore Fort which is in Tamil Nadu, India.
- Step 2: Determine the natural habitat of Grizzly Bears which is primarily in North America.
- Step 3: Confirm that Grizzly Bears are not native to the Indian subcontinent.
- Step 4: Verify that there are no historical records of Grizzly Bears being present in Vellore or Tamil Nadu.
- Step 5: Conclude that occupants of Vellore Fort would not have needed to defend themselves from Grizzly Bears.
<Answer>: No, occupants of Vellore Fort did not need to defend themselves from Grizzly Bears.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did a gladiator kill his opponent with a shotgun?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the time period associated with gladiators, which is primarily the Roman Empire, spanning from approximately 1000 BCE to 500 CE.
- Step 2: Determine the historical availability of shotguns, which were not invented until the 17th century and became widely used in the 18th and 19th centuries.
- Step 3: Compare the time periods to establish that shotguns were not available during the time of gladiators.
- Step 4: Conclude that a gladiator could not have killed his opponent with a shotgun because the weapon did not exist during the Roman era.
<Answer>: No, a gladiator could not have killed his opponent with a shotgun because shotguns were not invented until centuries after the time of the Roman Empire.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would Immanuel Kant be disgusted by the Black Lives Matter movement?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
Answer: It is not possible to definitively determine whether Immanuel Kant would be disgusted by the Black Lives Matter movement, as he lived in the 18th century and did not have the context or knowledge of modern social movements. His philosophical writings focused on ethics, morality, and human dignity, and while his ideas about universal moral principles might be interpreted in various ways in relation to contemporary issues, there is no direct evidence or statement from Kant about the Black Lives Matter movement.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Will 2020 elephant pregnancy last past next year with 4 solar eclipses?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Determine the gestation period of an elephant which is approximately 22 months.
- Step 2: Identify the start date of the elephant pregnancy as January 1, 2020.
- Step 3: Calculate the end date of the pregnancy by adding 22 months to January 1, 2020, resulting in November 1, 2021.
- Step 4: Check if the end date of the pregnancy (November 1, 2021) is past the end of 2021.
- Step 5: Identify the years in which solar eclipses occurred between January 1, 2020, and November 1, 2021, which includes 2020 and 2021.
- Step 6: Count the number of solar eclipses between January 1, 2020, and November 1, 2021, which totals 4.
<Answer>: Yes, a 2020 elephant pregnancy will last past next year (2021) and there were 4 solar eclipses during that time.
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is an espresso likely to assuage fear?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that assuage means to relieve or reduce.
- Step 2: Recognize that fear is an emotional state characterized by anxiety or apprehension.
- Step 3: Consider the physiological effects of espresso, which contains caffeine and stimulates the nervous system.
- Step 4: Note that caffeine can increase heart rate and alertness, potentially heightening anxiety in some individuals.
- Step 5: Acknowledge that while espresso may provide a temporary sense of alertness or confidence, it does not directly address or reduce fear.
- Step 6: Conclude that espresso is not likely to assuage fear as it may even exacerbate it in certain contexts.
<Answer>: No, an espresso is not likely to assuage fear as it may heighten anxiety due to its caffeine content.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Are people more likely than normal to get sunburn at Burning Man?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Burning Man is an annual event held in the desert where participants are exposed to intense sunlight for extended periods.
- Step 2: The event typically takes place in the late summer or early fall when solar radiation is at its peak.
- Step 3: Many attendees wear minimal clothing and use minimal sunscreen due to the event's countercultural and nude-friendly atmosphere.
- Step 4: The desert environment has high UV index levels, increasing the risk of sunburn.
- Step 5: Participants often engage in physical activities under the sun, further increasing exposure.
- Step 6: These factors combined—intense sunlight, lack of protective clothing, minimal sunscreen use, and physical activity—make sunburn more likely at Burning Man than in normal circumstances.
<Answer>: Yes, people are more likely than normal to get sunburn at Burning Man due to intense sunlight, lack of protective clothing, minimal sunscreen use, and physical activity in a high UV index environment.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do you often hear Marco Polo's name shouted near water?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that Marco Polo was a historical figure known for his travels to China during the 13th century.
- Step 2: Consider that "Marco Polo" is not commonly associated with water-related activities or locations in popular culture or historical records.
- Step 3: Note that the phrase "shouted near water" implies a common association or reference to Marco Polo in proximity to water.
- Step 4: Evaluate that there is no widespread cultural or historical practice of shouting Marco Polo's name near water.
- Step 5: Conclude that it is not common to hear Marco Polo's name shouted near water.
<Answer>: No.
| 1 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did Rahul Dravid ever kick a field goal?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that Rahul Dravid is a former cricketer from India who played as a batsman and wicket-keeper.
- Step 2: Determine that a field goal is a term used in sports such as American football and rugby, not cricket.
- Step 3: Confirm that cricket does not involve field goals as part of its rules or gameplay.
- Step 4: Conclude that Rahul Dravid, being a cricketer, would not have had the opportunity to kick a field goal.
<Answer>: No
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did Donatello use a smartphone?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the time period when Donatello lived, which was during the Renaissance, approximately 1400 to 1463.
- Step 2: Determine the invention date of the smartphone, which is a modern device developed in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
- Step 3: Compare the time periods to establish that Donatello lived centuries before the invention of the smartphone.
- Step 4: Conclude that Donatello could not have used a smartphone because it did not exist during his lifetime.
<Answer>: No, Donatello did not use a smartphone because he lived during the Renaissance, long before the invention of smartphones.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Was the death of Heath Ledger caused by his work on The Dark Knight?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that Heath Ledger died on January 22, 2008, due to an overdose of prescription drugs.
- Step 2: Note that Heath Ledger was working on The Dark Knight, which was released in 2008, and he completed his role as the Joker before his death.
- Step 3: Determine that the cause of death was officially reported as an accidental overdose, not directly related to his work on The Dark Knight.
- Step 4: Consider that while the stress of his role may have contributed to his mental health struggles, there is no conclusive evidence that his work on The Dark Knight directly caused his death.
- Step 5: Conclude that the death of Heath Ledger was not caused by his work on The Dark Knight, but rather by an overdose of prescription drugs.
<Answer>: No, the death of Heath Ledger was not caused by his work on The Dark Knight. He died from an accidental overdose of prescription drugs, and while his role as the Joker may have contributed to his mental health struggles, there is no direct causal link between his work on the film and his death.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is "A Tale of Two Cities" a parody of the Bible?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the author of "A Tale of Two Cities" as Charles Dickens.
- Step 2: Determine that "A Tale of Two Cities" is a historical novel set during the French Revolution.
- Step 3: Analyze the content and themes of "A Tale of Two Cities" to see if it contains elements of parody.
- Step 4: Note that the novel does not mock or satirize the Bible or its teachings.
- Step 5: Recognize that the novel's primary focus is on social injustice and human sacrifice rather than religious parody.
- Step 6: Conclude that "A Tale of Two Cities" is not a parody of the Bible.
<Answer>: No, "A Tale of Two Cities" is not a parody of the Bible.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is the letter D influenced by the shape of ancient doors?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the origin and evolution of the letter D in ancient writing systems.
- Step 2: Examine the historical shapes of doors in ancient civilizations.
- Step 3: Compare the visual characteristics of the letter D with the shapes of ancient doors.
- Step 4: Investigate any historical or linguistic evidence linking the letter D to door shapes.
- Step 5: Determine if there is a direct or symbolic influence from ancient doors on the letter D.
<Answer>: No, the letter D is not influenced by the shape of ancient doors. The letter D evolved from ancient scripts such as Phoenician and Greek alphabets, where it represented a sound rather than a symbolic representation of a door. There is no historical or linguistic evidence to suggest that the shape of ancient doors influenced the design of the letter D.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Did Julio Gonzalez like acetylene?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify who Julio Gonzalez is and any known associations with acetylene
- Step 2: Determine if there is historical or biographical information indicating Julio Gonzalez's preferences or work related to acetylene
- Step 3: Analyze available evidence to conclude whether Julio Gonzalez liked acetylene
- Step 4: Find that Julio Gonzalez was a renowned sculptor known for working with various metals and materials but there is no specific evidence indicating he liked acetylene
- Step 5: Conclude that there is no definitive information to confirm Julio Gonzalez liked acetylene
<Answer>: There is no definitive information to confirm whether Julio Gonzalez liked acetylene.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is clerk of Supreme Court of Canada safe profession for someone with seismophobia?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify seismophobia as an irrational fear of earthquakes.
- Step 2: Determine the location of the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa, Ontario.
- Step 3: Research the seismic activity in Ottawa, Ontario, noting it is in a low-seismic-risk zone.
- Step 4: Confirm that the probability of experiencing an earthquake in Ottawa is very low.
- Step 5: Conclude that the risk of earthquakes at the Supreme Court of Canada is minimal.
- Step 6: Determine that the profession of a clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada involves no direct exposure to seismic events.
- Step 7: Evaluate that the minimal seismic risk in Ottawa makes the profession safe for someone with seismophobia.
<Answer>: Yes, the clerk position at the Supreme Court of Canada is a safe profession for someone with seismophobia because Ottawa, where the court is located, is in a low-seismic-risk zone, minimizing the likelihood of earthquakes.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does an individual oceanographer study many sciences?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Define an oceanographer as a scientist who studies the ocean and its phenomena.
- Step 2: Recognize that oceanography is an interdisciplinary field combining aspects of physics, chemistry, biology, and geology.
- Step 3: Identify that studying the ocean requires knowledge of physical processes such as currents and waves.
- Step 4: Identify that studying the ocean requires knowledge of chemical processes such as salinity and pH levels.
- Step 5: Identify that studying the ocean requires knowledge of biological processes such as marine life and ecosystems.
- Step 6: Identify that studying the ocean requires knowledge of geological processes such as seafloor topography and plate tectonics.
- Step 7: Conclude that an individual oceanographer must study many sciences to fully understand the ocean and its complex systems.
<Answer>: Yes, an individual oceanographer studies many sciences.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does Antarctica have a lot of problems relating to homelessness?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the population of Antarctica which is primarily composed of scientific researchers and support staff stationed at research bases.
- Step 2: Note that Antarctica does not have permanent residents or a civilian population.
- Step 3: Recognize that homelessness is a condition typically associated with populations that lack stable housing within a society.
- Step 4: Determine that since there are no permanent residents or homeless individuals in Antarctica, the issue of homelessness does not apply there.
- Step 5: Conclude that Antarctica does not have problems relating to homelessness due to the absence of a civilian population.
<Answer>: No, Antarctica does not have problems relating to homelessness because it has no permanent residents or civilian population.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Was Superhero fiction invented in the digital format?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the origin of superhero fiction by examining early works in the medium.
- Step 2: Determine if early superhero fiction was published in print or digital format.
- Step 3: Note that the first superhero comic book, Action Comics #1 featuring Superman, was published in 1938 in print format.
- Step 4: Recognize that digital formats such as e-books and online comics became available much later, in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
- Step 5: Conclude that superhero fiction was not invented in the digital format as it originated in print.
<Answer>: No, superhero fiction was not invented in the digital format. It originated in print with the release of Action Comics #1 in 1938.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Are coopers required in the beverage industry?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the role of coopers in the beverage industry by examining their traditional function of making and repairing wooden barrels used for aging and storing beverages.
- Step 2: Determine if the beverage industry still uses wooden barrels for aging or storing beverages such as wine, beer, or spirits.
- Step 3: Confirm that the use of wooden barrels in the beverage industry is still prevalent in certain sectors, particularly in the production of wine, whiskey, and craft beer.
- Step 4: Conclude that coopers are required in the beverage industry to the extent that wooden barrels are used for aging and storing beverages.
<Answer>: Yes, coopers are required in the beverage industry to the extent that wooden barrels are used for aging and storing beverages such as wine, whiskey, and craft beer.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Could two newborn American Black Bear cubs fit on a king size bed?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Determine the dimensions of a king size bed which are typically 76 inches (6 feet 4 inches) in width and 80 inches (6 feet 8 inches) in length.
- Step 2: Determine the average size of a newborn American Black Bear cub which is approximately 12 to 15 inches in length and weighs around 1 to 2 pounds.
- Step 3: Calculate the total length required for two cubs lying side by side which would be approximately 15 inches for each cub totaling 30 inches.
- Step 4: Compare the total length required for the cubs (30 inches) with the width of the king size bed (76 inches) which shows that the cubs would easily fit side by side.
- Step 5: Confirm that the length of the bed (80 inches) is more than sufficient to accommodate the cubs even if they are placed lengthwise.
- Step 6: Conclude that the size of the cubs is significantly smaller than the dimensions of the king size bed allowing them to fit comfortably.
<Answer>: Yes, two newborn American Black Bear cubs could fit on a king size bed.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Gandalf hypothetically defeats Rincewind in a wizard battle?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that Gandalf and Rincewind are characters from different fictional universes with distinct abilities and contexts.
- Step 2: Gandalf is a powerful wizard from J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings," while Rincewind is a less powerful wizard from Terry Pratchett's "Discworld" series.
- Step 3: Compare the magical systems of the two fictional worlds to determine if a direct comparison is valid.
- Step 4: Recognize that the magical systems and power scales differ significantly between the two universes, making a direct battle outcome speculative.
- Step 5: Conclude that the hypothetical scenario of Gandalf defeating Rincewind is not a meaningful or answerable question due to the differing fictional contexts.
<Answer>: The question is hypothetical and based on fictional characters from different universes with distinct magical systems, making a definitive answer impossible.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would an Alfa Romeo vehicle fit inside a barn?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Determine the average size of an Alfa Romeo vehicle by referencing standard dimensions for a typical model such as the Alfa Romeo Giulia, which is approximately 180 inches long, 70 inches wide, and 60 inches high.
- Step 2: Determine the average internal dimensions of a standard barn, which typically ranges from 20 to 40 feet in width, 30 to 50 feet in depth, and 10 to 15 feet in height.
- Step 3: Convert the dimensions of the Alfa Romeo from inches to feet, resulting in approximately 15 feet long, 5.8 feet wide, and 5 feet high.
- Step 4: Compare the converted dimensions of the Alfa Romeo with the internal dimensions of the barn and find that the barn is significantly larger in all dimensions.
- Step 5: Conclude that the Alfa Romeo vehicle would fit inside a standard barn as its dimensions are much smaller than the typical internal dimensions of a barn.
<Answer>: Yes, an Alfa Romeo vehicle would fit inside a barn.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is strep throat harmless to singer Rita Ora after her 2020 tonsilitis surgery?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that strep throat is a bacterial infection caused by Streptococcus pyogenes.
- Step 2: Note that Rita Ora underwent tonsilitis surgery in 2020, which likely involved the removal of her tonsils (tonsillectomy).
- Step 3: Recognize that strep throat typically affects the throat and can lead to complications if left untreated.
- Step 4: Understand that while a tonsillectomy reduces the risk of recurrent tonsillitis, it does not eliminate the possibility of strep throat entirely.
- Step 5: Acknowledge that strep throat can still occur in individuals who have had their tonsils removed, as the infection can affect other areas of the throat.
- Step 6: Consider that untreated strep throat can lead to serious complications such as rheumatic fever or kidney inflammation.
- Step 7: Conclude that strep throat is not harmless to anyone, including Rita Ora, even after tonsilitis surgery, due to the potential for complications and the fact that the surgery does not fully prevent strep infections.
<Answer>: No, strep throat is not harmless to singer Rita Ora after her 2020 tonsilitis surgery. While the surgery may reduce the risk of recurrent tonsillitis, it does not eliminate the possibility of strep throat, which can still cause complications if left untreated.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would the United States Military Academy reject an applicant with multiple sclerosis?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: The United States Military Academy (USMA) has specific medical standards outlined in the Department of Defense's medical evaluation criteria for military service.
- Step 2: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease that can affect mobility, cognition, and other essential functions required for military service.
- Step 3: According to the Department of Defense medical standards, individuals with MS are generally disqualified from military service due to the unpredictable nature of the disease and its potential impact on duty performance.
- Step 4: The USMA follows these same medical standards as other branches of the military when evaluating applicants.
- Step 5: Therefore, an applicant with multiple sclerosis would likely be rejected by the United States Military Academy based on medical disqualification criteria.
<Answer>: Yes, the United States Military Academy would likely reject an applicant with multiple sclerosis due to the medical disqualification criteria set by the Department of Defense.
<end of response>
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Could someone in Tokyo take a taxi to the The Metropolitan Museum of Art?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the location of Tokyo as the city in Japan.
- Step 2: Identify the location of The Metropolitan Museum of Art as being in New York City, United States.
- Step 3: Determine that Tokyo and New York City are in different countries and are separated by a large distance.
- Step 4: Recognize that a taxi is a local ground transportation vehicle and cannot be used for international travel.
- Step 5: Conclude that it is not possible to take a taxi directly from Tokyo to The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
<Answer>: No, someone in Tokyo cannot take a taxi to The Metropolitan Museum of Art because it is located in New York City, and a taxi is not a means of international travel.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does Adobe Suite have video game engine coding?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that Adobe Suite is a collection of software applications primarily used for multimedia and creative tasks such as graphic design, video editing, and web development.
- Step 2: Note that Adobe Suite includes applications like Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere Pro, and After Effects, which are not related to video game engine coding.
- Step 3: Recognize that video game engine coding typically involves programming languages like C++, C#, and tools like Unity or Unreal Engine, which are not part of Adobe Suite.
- Step 4: Conclude that Adobe Suite does not include video game engine coding capabilities.
<Answer>: No, Adobe Suite does not have video game engine coding.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is Europa (moon) name origin related to Amunet?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify the origin of the name "Europa" which is derived from Greek mythology, specifically the Phoenician princess Europa.
- Step 2: Identify the origin of the name "Amunet" which is an ancient Egyptian goddess, associated with the god Amun.
- Step 3: Determine if there is any linguistic, cultural, or historical connection between the names "Europa" and "Amunet."
- Step 4: Conclude that there is no direct or indirect relationship between the name origins of Europa and Amunet as they originate from different mythological traditions.
<Answer>: No, the name origin of Europa (moon) is not related to Amunet. Europa's name comes from Greek mythology, while Amunet is an ancient Egyptian goddess. They originate from different cultural and mythological traditions.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Was Jean Valjean imprisoned due to hunger?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the reason for Jean Valjean's imprisonment in the novel Les Misérables by Victor Hugo.
- Step 2: Recall that Jean Valjean was imprisoned for stealing bread to feed his sister's children.
- Step 3: Determine that stealing bread was an act driven by extreme poverty and hunger.
- Step 4: Conclude that Jean Valjean was imprisoned due to hunger as the underlying cause of his theft.
<Answer>: Yes, Jean Valjean was imprisoned due to hunger as he stole bread to feed his sister's children.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would someone on Venus be unlikely to experience hypothermia?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify the average surface temperature of Venus as approximately 462 degrees Celsius.
- Step 2: Recognize that hypothermia occurs when the body loses heat faster than it can produce it, typically in cold environments.
- Step 3: Determine that the extreme heat on Venus would cause the body to lose fluids rapidly and potentially lead to hyperthermia rather than hypothermia.
- Step 4: Conclude that due to the extremely high temperatures on Venus, the likelihood of experiencing hypothermia is extremely low.
<Answer>: Yes, someone on Venus would be unlikely to experience hypothermia due to the planet's extremely high surface temperatures.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Is Jack Black unlikely to compete with Bear McCreary for an award?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify Jack Black as an actor and comedian primarily known for his work in film and television.
- Step 2: Identify Bear McCreary as a composer and musician known for his work in film and television scores.
- Step 3: Determine that awards in the film and television industry are typically categorized by profession such as acting, directing, writing, and composing.
- Step 4: Recognize that Jack Black and Bear McCreary work in different professional categories within the industry.
- Step 5: Conclude that Jack Black and Bear McCreary are unlikely to compete for the same award due to their different professional roles.
<Answer>: Yes, Jack Black is unlikely to compete with Bear McCreary for an award.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would Cuba Libre consumption help with insomnia?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that Cuba Libre is a cocktail containing rum, cola, and sometimes lime.
- Step 2: Recognize that alcohol, such as rum, is a central nervous system depressant.
- Step 3: Note that alcohol can initially induce drowsiness but disrupts sleep quality and may lead to fragmented sleep.
- Step 4: Consider that caffeine, found in cola, is a stimulant that can interfere with sleep onset and duration.
- Step 5: Conclude that the combination of alcohol and caffeine in Cuba Libre is unlikely to help with insomnia and may worsen it.
<Answer>: No, Cuba Libre consumption is unlikely to help with insomnia and may worsen it due to the combination of alcohol and caffeine.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Does Nigella Lawson care about solubility?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that Nigella Lawson is a British chef, author, and television presenter known for her cooking shows and recipes.
- Step 2: Determine that solubility is a scientific concept related to the ability of a substance to dissolve in a solvent.
- Step 3: Consider that Nigella Lawson's professional work primarily involves cooking, which may involve some understanding of ingredients and their properties but not necessarily scientific concepts like solubility.
- Step 4: Conclude that there is no publicly available information indicating that Nigella Lawson has expressed any particular interest or concern about solubility as a scientific concept.
<Answer>: There is no evidence to suggest that Nigella Lawson cares about solubility.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can E6000 cure before a hoverboard finishes the Daytona 500? <|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Determine the typical curing time for E6000 adhesive, which is approximately 24 hours for full cure.
- Step 2: Identify the duration of the Daytona 500 race, which is typically around 4 hours.
- Step 3: Compare the curing time of E6000 with the duration of the Daytona 500.
- Step 4: Conclude that E6000 does not have enough time to fully cure during the Daytona 500.
<Answer>: No, E6000 cannot cure before a hoverboard finishes the Daytona 500.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Could the Pope be on an episode of Pimp My Ride?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: Identify that Pimp My Ride is a television show that features individuals getting their cars customized.
- Step 2: Determine that the Pope is the leader of the Roman Catholic Church and a prominent religious figure.
- Step 3: Consider that the Pope's public appearances are typically formal and related to religious or diplomatic events.
- Step 4: Recognize that while there are no strict rules preventing the Pope from appearing on any television show, his schedule and the nature of his role make such an appearance highly unlikely.
- Step 5: Conclude that while it is theoretically possible, the Pope being on an episode of Pimp My Ride is extremely improbable given his role and public engagements.
<Answer>: It is theoretically possible but extremely improbable given the Pope's role and public engagements.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Are pennies commonly used in Canada?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that pennies in Canada refer to the one-cent coin formerly used in Canadian currency.
- Step 2: Recall that Canada phased out the one-cent coin in 2012 due to its low value and high production costs.
- Step 3: Note that after 2012, the Canadian government no longer produced pennies and encouraged rounding of prices to the nearest five cents.
- Step 4: Acknowledge that while pennies are no longer in circulation, they may still be found in circulation from before 2012.
- Step 5: Conclude that pennies are not commonly used in Canada today as they are no longer produced or circulated.
<Answer>: No, pennies are not commonly used in Canada today as they were phased out of circulation in 2012.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Do drag kings take testosterone to look masculine?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that drag kings are performers who dress and act in a masculine manner typically associated with men.
- Step 2: Note that some drag kings may use hormones such as testosterone to achieve a more masculine appearance and physical characteristics.
- Step 3: Acknowledge that not all drag kings use testosterone, as the choice to use hormones is personal and varies among individuals.
- Step 4: Conclude that while some drag kings may take testosterone to look more masculine, it is not a universal practice among all drag kings.
<Answer>: Some drag kings may take testosterone to look more masculine, but it is not a universal practice among all drag kings.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Will Chick Fil A be open on Halloween 2021?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Determine the date of Halloween 2021 which is October 31, 2021.
- Step 2: Check if Chick Fil A has a policy of being closed on certain holidays.
- Step 3: Chick Fil A is generally closed on Sundays and holidays such as Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's Day.
- Step 4: Halloween is not listed as an official holiday in the United States.
- Step 5: Therefore, Chick Fil A is likely to be open on Halloween 2021 unless there is a specific local closure.
- Step 6: Confirm that there is no indication of a specific closure for Halloween 2021 for Chick Fil A.
<Answer>: Yes, Chick Fil A will be open on Halloween 2021.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Can you order an Alfa Romeo at Starbucks?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| false |
- Step 1: Identify that Starbucks is a coffee shop chain known for selling beverages and food items.
- Step 2: Recognize that Alfa Romeo is a brand of luxury cars, not a food or beverage item.
- Step 3: Determine that Starbucks does not sell cars or automotive products.
- Step 4: Conclude that ordering an Alfa Romeo at Starbucks is not possible.
<Answer>: No, you cannot order an Alfa Romeo at Starbucks.
| 0 |
<|im_start|>user
You will be presented with a <Question>. Before providing the [Answer], you should first think step-by-step carefully.
Your response format:
<start of response>
Reasoning Steps:
- Step 1: [Your first reasoning step]
- Step 2: [Your second reasoning step]
- Step 3: [Next step, and so on...]
...
- Step N: [Final reasoning step]
<Answer>: [Your final answer]
<end of response>
Strict Requirements:
- DO NOT include any text outside the specified format.
- Each reasoning step MUST be written on a **single line only**: NO line breaks, bullet points, or substeps within a step.
- Each step should express one precise and **self-contained** logical operation, deduction, calculation, or fact application.
- Steps MUST provide explicit result of the step or concrete reasoning outcomes. Avoid vague explanations or meta-descriptions of the reasoning process.
- For example:
- Good: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4, which equals 20."
- Bad: "- Step 1: Multiply 5 by 4." (no result of the step or concrete reasoning outcome)
- Continue writing steps until the problem is solved.
- Violating ANY requirement above is NOT acceptable.
Now answer:
<Question>: Would a recruit for the United States Marine Corps be turned away for self harm?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
<think>
</think>
Reasoning Steps:
| true |
- Step 1: The United States Marine Corps has medical and psychological screening processes to assess a recruit's mental health and fitness for service.
- Step 2: Self-harm is a significant indicator of potential mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation.
- Step 3: The Marine Corps evaluates recruits for any history of self-harm or mental health conditions that could impair their ability to perform duties.
- Step 4: If a recruit has a documented history of self-harm or current mental health concerns, they may be disqualified from enlistment.
- Step 5: The final decision is made by a medical officer based on the recruit's overall mental and physical fitness for service.
<Answer>: Yes, a recruit for the United States Marine Corps could be turned away if they have a history of self-harm or current mental health issues that indicate they may not be fit for service.
| 0 |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 62