arg_1
stringlengths
4
5.08k
round_1
float64
2
8
ann_1
float64
1
2
arg_2
stringlengths
8
2.19k
round_2
float64
1
7
ann_2
float64
1
2
annotation_name
stringclasses
131 values
is_attacks
int64
0
1
Minimizing DON contamination in grains is a major goal of Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) research community.
null
null
1 Response to Reviewer 1 Comments Point 1: I would like to suggest authors label inoculation points in Figure 1, which could give readers a clear view of three different inoculation methods.
null
null
toxins14060409_makarova
0
This may be true, but far more studies have confirmed this link than have refuted it.
null
null
The IFITM3 blot shows wide variability with no pattern from one hour to the next, and yet the conclusion is that there is no change in IFITM3 levels during this time period.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
Figure 1 should be labeled as to what treatments are used in panels A-E. As it is now, the figure on its own cannot possibly be interpreted without the legend.
null
null
d. Figure 2B - Western blot examining levels of IFITM3 should include 24 hpi to correlate with the data presented in Figure 1.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
There are few clarifications that would strengthen the overall manuscript.
null
null
Additional minor comments on the figures include: a.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
At later timepoints is the NP stain nuclear as expected, is this simply a delay in replication?
null
null
Supplemental figures should be included in the main text.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
There are few clarifications that would strengthen the overall manuscript.
null
null
d. Figure 2B - Western blot examining levels of IFITM3 should include 24 hpi to correlate with the data presented in Figure 1.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
At later timepoints is the NP stain nuclear as expected, is this simply a delay in replication?
null
null
Additionally, the role of cholesterol in IFITM3’s mechanism of action has been largely disproven by the field, and reference 52 seems to have been misused in line 73.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
Using super-resolution microscopy the authors show colocalization of IFITM3 with influenza viral nucleoprotein and early endosomal proteins.
null
null
c. Labels or zoomed out images from those presented in Figure 3 and 7 are needed to orient the reader to where within a cell the colocalization is observed.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
If this is not acceptable we will make the changes in final revision.
null
null
IFITM3 protein increased significantly after longer infection times such as 24 h p.i.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
Furthermore, the authors need to examine the literature more carefully, as previous studies have indeed shown that IFITM3 knockdown in A549 cells increases influenza virus infection, e.g., Lin, Cell Reports, 2013.
null
null
At later timepoints is the NP stain nuclear as expected, is this simply a delay in replication?
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
Lines 227/228: This sentence is misleading as the references cited are not contradictory, nor are they unclear as to IFITM3 possessing antiviral activity.
null
null
Additional minor comments on the figures include: a.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
This helix and neighboring palmitoylation sites are among the most highly conserved residues among IFITMs from all species.
null
null
Additionally, a second SNP in the IFITM3 promoter has also been linked to severe flu.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
At later timepoints is the NP stain nuclear as expected, is this simply a delay in replication?
null
null
This does not appear to increase post infection as was shown previously.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
They show that IFITM3 clusters within 1 h of influenza virus infection, prior to increases in the protein’s levels as induced by the infection.
null
null
qPCR is acceptable, but an IFITM3 Western would be better, particularly since the antibody is readily available.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
These IFITM3 clusters were found to correlate with restriction of virus infection and to co-localize with incoming virus.
null
null
There are few clarifications that would strengthen the overall manuscript.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
Lines 67-73 The inhibition of virus membrane fusion by IFITM3 has been attributed to the presence of a palmitoylated amphipathic helix within IFITM3 (Chesarino, EMBO Reports, 2017).
null
null
There are few clarifications that would strengthen the overall manuscript.
null
null
v11060548_makarova
0
Using super-resolution microscopy the authors show colocalization of IFITM3 with influenza viral nucleoprotein and early endosomal proteins.
null
null
In addition, the movie does not provide any details on cellular features and a viewer is left wondering where the foci are coming from and going.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
The NP stain in HSAEpCs is only shown to be cytoplasmic, inclusion of an uninfected control would demonstrate specificity of the staining.
null
null
Furthermore, the authors need to examine the literature more carefully, as previous studies have indeed shown that IFITM3 knockdown in A549 cells increases influenza virus infection, e.g., Lin, Cell Reports, 2013.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
d. Figure 2B - Western blot examining levels of IFITM3 should include 24 hpi to correlate with the data presented in Figure 1.
null
null
The largest concern is regarding the colocalization of IFITM3 and Rab11A.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
The NP stain in HSAEpCs is only shown to be cytoplasmic, inclusion of an uninfected control would demonstrate specificity of the staining.
null
null
For a review of these studies, see Zani, Current Clin Microbiol Reports, 2018, though the primary articles should be cited.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Supplemental figures should be included in the main text.
null
null
This helix and neighboring palmitoylation sites are among the most highly conserved residues among IFITMs from all species.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
qPCR is acceptable, but an IFITM3 Western would be better, particularly since the antibody is readily available.
null
null
d. Figure 2B - Western blot examining levels of IFITM3 should include 24 hpi to correlate with the data presented in Figure 1.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Additionally, the role of cholesterol in IFITM3’s mechanism of action has been largely disproven by the field, and reference 52 seems to have been misused in line 73.
null
null
Following the suggestion of this reviewer, we have removed the movie in the revised version.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Figure 3A: Why is there so much IFITM3 present in the uninfected cells?
null
null
At later timepoints is the NP stain nuclear as expected, is this simply a delay in replication?
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Figure 4: Label the figure so that it can be interpreted independent of the legend.
null
null
Further, they observed that the IFITM3 clusters that form early in infection are at early endosomes and progress to late endosomes and lysosomes as infection proceeds, consistent with IFITM3 directing incoming virus to degradative compartments.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Furthermore, the authors need to examine the literature more carefully, as previous studies have indeed shown that IFITM3 knockdown in A549 cells increases influenza virus infection, e.g., Lin, Cell Reports, 2013.
null
null
In addition, the movie does not provide any details on cellular features and a viewer is left wondering where the foci are coming from and going.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Lines 227/228: This sentence is misleading as the references cited are not contradictory, nor are they unclear as to IFITM3 possessing antiviral activity.
null
null
Figure 5A/C: Label the figure so that it can be interpreted independent of the legend.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
If this is not acceptable we will make the changes in final revision.
null
null
This study provides imaging of the antiviral protein IFITM3 at endogenous levels and at super-resolution in the context of influenza virus infection.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Further, the studies which failed to find an association were generally performed in populations in which the SNP is almost non-existent.
null
null
Therefore the inclusion of the movie examining the colocalization of Rab11A GFP, IFITM3-SNAP, and labeled virion seems completely unnecessary.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Furthermore, the authors need to examine the literature more carefully, as previous studies have indeed shown that IFITM3 knockdown in A549 cells increases influenza virus infection, e.g., Lin, Cell Reports, 2013.
null
null
Additional minor comments on the figures include: a.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
This may be true, but far more studies have confirmed this link than have refuted it.
null
null
Figure 5A/C: Label the figure so that it can be interpreted independent of the legend.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Following the suggestion of this reviewer, we have removed the movie in the revised version.
null
null
Furthermore, the authors need to examine the literature more carefully, as previous studies have indeed shown that IFITM3 knockdown in A549 cells increases influenza virus infection, e.g., Lin, Cell Reports, 2013.
null
null
v11060548_perova
0
Author Response Thank you very much for your support and help.
null
null
Authors may provide data in the supporting information file.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
The BAC biofilter can remove the PPCPs, and then the following UF can reject micro-organisms and particles flowing out from the biofilter to ensure the quality of drinking water.
null
null
Please target the specific gap such as 2015-2021 etc Response 3:
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Techno-economic assessment of Minimal Liquid Discharge (MLD) treatment systems for saline wastewater (brine) management and treatment.
null
null
The reviewer suggests statistical analysis using a t-test (Raw water- BAC-Effluent and Raw water – BAC/UF-effluent).
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
In the present form conclusion is very weird.
null
null
Response 7: Thank you very much for your kind reminder.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
In the present form conclusion is very weird.
null
null
I can see very well-defined experiments and produced good results.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
The two-stage biofilms located in the activated carbon column and on the UF membrane synergistically, can be conducive to the removal performances.
null
null
Point 14: Please use one style for units such as m3/h or m3h-1 Please revise your paper accordingly since some issue occurs on several spots in the paper.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Size exclusion is considered the primary removal mechanism for the UF.
null
null
The manuscript could be accepted for publication after a minor revision.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Response 11: Thanks very much for this comment.
null
null
They also discussed their results in detail and put the difference in their results compared to the data with the literature.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Point 5: Conclusion: Make it as one or two paragraphs.
null
null
Point 5: Line 53-55: “The combined process with ultrafiltration may be another promising choice, featuring a comparable removing performance as the nanofiltration and low operational cost”.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Two native English-speaking colleagues help us verify the manuscript.
null
null
Results seem to be related to a unique experiment.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Response 5: Thanks very much for this comment.
null
null
Study and evaluation of the characteristics of saline wastewater (brine) produced by desalination and industrial plants.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Response 6: Thanks very much for this comment.
null
null
Response to Reviewer 4 Comments Point 1: Authors should avoid abbreviations in the title and the abstract.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Point 9: Please check the abbreviations of words throughout the article.
null
null
However, in the case of the PPCPs with a small molecular weight (typically < 600 Da), UF membranes also cannot effectively reject these PPCPs, but nanofiltration and reverse osmosis are able to remove these PPCPs based on the thin-film composite”.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
The article topic is intriguing and promising in the area.
null
null
Response 13: Thank you very much for your kind reminder.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
It was found that the BAC unit 25 played a key role in PPCPs removal and the UF unit also degraded them by the biomass on UF 26 membranes.
null
null
The BAC biofilter can remove the PPCPs, and then the following UF can reject micro-organisms and particles flowing out from the biofilter to ensure the quality of drinking water.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
In the present form conclusion is very weird.
null
null
: +86 15765532017; E-mail: [email protected] (J. Wang) 14 Abstract: Biological activated carbon (BAC) biofilter coupling ultrafiltration (UF) is a promising 15 process for the treatment of surface water contaminated by pharmaceutical and personal care prod- 16 ucts (PPCPs).
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
The comparison of previous research with existing research findings was added in the final part of the results and discussion.
null
null
Response 9: Thanks very much for this comment.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Response 8: Thanks very much for this comment.
null
null
“The combined process with ultrafiltration may be another promising choice, featuring a comparable removing performance as the nanofiltration and low operational cost”.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
If possible, please add at least one paragraph.
null
null
Response 2: Thank you very much for your kind reminder.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Please revise your paper accordingly since some issue occurs on several spots in the paper.
null
null
43 Citation: Wanga, Q.; Tanga, X.; Zenga, W.; Wangb, F.; Gongb, W.; Chena, J.; Wanga, J.; Lia, G.; Lianga, H. Pilot-scale biological activated carbon filtration-ultrafiltration (BAC-UF) system for removing pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) from surface wa- ter.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Point 9: Point 6: Why the same trend of increase or decrease in graphs (Fig.
null
null
Sorry, but I don't see why UF can reject viruses and bacteria but not PPCPs.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Point 9: Point 6: Why the same trend of increase or decrease in graphs (Fig.
null
null
Response 6: Thanks very much for this comment.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Greetings, Editor thank you for providing me with the opportunity to review the article.
null
null
Please clarify, why ultrafiltration cannot remove the PPCPs since it can remove bacteria and viruses.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Please also see the attached file for my corrections/comments.
null
null
Size exclusion is considered the primary removal mechanism for the UF.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Two native English-speaking colleagues help us verify the manuscript.
null
null
The comparison of previous research with existing research findings was added in the final part of the results and discussion.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Point 3: Introduction section must be written on more quality way, i.e., more up-to-date references addressed.
null
null
Generally, many PPCPs 41 flow through conventional water treatment processes with little degradation due to their 42 persistency or/and the continuous introduction [5].
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
The concentrations and diversities complicate the associated detec- 40 tion and even create challenges for water purification processes.
null
null
The same trend (Figure 2) was mainly due to the stable removal ability of BAC and UF for organics, causing the removal restriction.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Response to Reviewer 4 Comments Point 1: Authors should avoid abbreviations in the title.
null
null
Point 3: References should be according to the journal format.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Please consider these at end of this sentence……The oxidation method exhibited a fast reaction speed and high removal efficiency…(i) Role of nanomaterials in the treatment of wastewater: A review (ii) Advances and challenges in developing efficient graphene oxide-based ZnO photocatalysts for dye photo-oxidation.
null
null
Response 14: Thank you very much for your kind reminder.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
If possible, please add at least one paragraph.
null
null
The study was carried out in the pilot-scale BAC-UF process with a treatment capacity of 0.16 m3/h.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
The BAC biofilter can remove the PPCPs, and then the following UF can reject micro-organisms and particles flowing out from the biofilter to ensure the quality of drinking water.
null
null
Point 3: Line 46-52: & line 84-85 “Ultrafiltration (UF) as an emerging alternative technology to conventional water treatment processes, has been widely used to remove pollutants such as particles, colloids, bacteria, and viruses, thus reducing the risk of water-borne diseases [10].
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Water 2022, 13, x. https://doi.org/10.3390/xxxxx Academic Editor(s): Received: date Accepted: date Published: date Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- tral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institu- tional affiliations.
null
null
The authors reported the results with an average value and standard deviation.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
However, the long-term pilot-scale study is urge to be investigated.
null
null
Point 8: The main objective of the work must be written on the more clear and more concise way at the end of introduction section.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Response 8: T Thanks very much for this comment.
null
null
The two-stage biofilms located in the activated carbon column and on the UF membrane synergistically, can be conducive to the removal performances.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Response 10: Thank you very much for your kind reminder.
null
null
After the gas scrubbing and the hydraulic backwashing, the dissolved oxygen detection of the effluent was carried out, resulting in the above results for dissolved oxygen.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Why is the standard deviation of Erythromycin showing a high value?
null
null
The comparison of previous research with existing research findings was added in the final part of the results and discussion.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Response 7: Thank you very much for your kind reminder.
null
null
The BAC biofilter can remove the PPCPs, and then the following UF can reject micro-organisms and particles flowing out from the biofilter to ensure the quality of drinking water.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Moreover, the authors present the results properly.
null
null
I am pleased to send you major level comments, there are some serious flaws which need to be corrected before publication.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Point 14: Please use one style for units such as m3/h or m3h-1 Please revise your paper accordingly since some issue occurs on several spots in the paper.
null
null
Author Response Thank you very much for your support and help.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Energy Conversion and Management, 235. Panagopoulos, A. (2021).
null
null
Results seem to be related to a unique experiment.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
These 38 PPCPs generally present in waters at trace concentrations, ranging from several ng/L to 39 thousands μg/L [4].
null
null
After the gas scrubbing and the hydraulic backwashing, the dissolved oxygen detection of the effluent was carried out, resulting in the above results for dissolved oxygen.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
Raw water quality parameters of river water (significant value, 0.05).
null
null
I can see very well-defined experiments and produced good results.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
“The combined process with ultrafiltration may be another promising choice, featuring a comparable removing performance as the nanofiltration and low operational cost”.
null
null
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-14.
null
null
w14030367_perova
0
So I had to acquire the Florida soil properties information by website.
null
null
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2015,177-178(June–July):85-92.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
Author Response Dear Editor: Thank you very much for the comments of my manuscript.
null
null
At first, the soil was 0.3 mm sieved, but the big particle size was not appropriate for the soil ultrasonic treatment of NP extraction.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
Please feel free to contact me if any questions.
null
null
Consequently you excluded an important part of the active soil from your study, therefore your resuts are very limited.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
I strongly recommend the authors to analysis the biomass of the soil samples R: Indeed, in this study, the analysis of biomass and microorganism of the soil samples is essential.
null
null
Indeed, the characteristics of the soil are too limited.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
Yours sincerely, Shiyu Wang [email protected] Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
Yours sincerely, Shiyu Wang [email protected] Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
The main reason is that this experiment was conducted during my being in University of Florida, USA as a visiting scholar.
null
null
Please feel free to contact me if any questions.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
The basic physi-chemical parameters of soils should be given.
null
null
The irrigation water physi-chemical parameters should be given.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
Your careful review of this manuscript is highly appreciated.
null
null
(+86)13910796093 March 27 Dear Editor and Reviewers: Thank you very much for the comments of my manuscript.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
(+86)13910796093 Apr 2 Dear Editor: Thank you very much for the comments of my manuscript.
null
null
The following are the details of the revision and marked red in the “resubmit” version.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
I have carefully read the comments and made a revision.
null
null
I have carefully read the comments and made a revision.
null
null
w14081258_makarova
0
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 158 (2018) 28–36.
null
null
R: It has been given in Supporting Information 2.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
Yours sincerely, Shiyu Wang [email protected] Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
Figure 1 legends of axis need font size larger, please make readable the figures R:Accepted and revised in L204.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
R: It has been given in Supporting Information 2.
null
null
Your careful review of this manuscript is highly appreciated.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
Actually, the soil samples were 0.25 mm sieved.
null
null
Figure 1 should be revised according to kinect model.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
I strongly recommend the authors to analysis the biomass of the soil samples R: Indeed, in this study, the analysis of biomass and microorganism of the soil samples is essential.
null
null
(+86)13910796093 March 27 Dear Editor and Reviewers: Thank you very much for the comments of my manuscript.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
However, the information I can acquire from the website was limited, which were shown in Supporting Information 2.
null
null
Shiyu Wang, Wenyong Wu*, Fei Liu, Shiyang Yin, Zhe Bao, Honglu Liu.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
However, the information I can acquire from the website was limited, which were shown in Supporting Information 2.
null
null
The following are the details of the revision and marked red in the “resubmit” version.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
The following are the details of the revision and marked red in the “resubmit” version.
null
null
All the isomers were revised according to kinect model except some isomers, such as NP2 NP5 and NP11.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
Sorption and desorption behaviours of 4-nonylphenol on reclaimed water-irrigated soils.
null
null
Indeed, the characteristics of the soil are too limited.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
Then the soil was 0.25mm-sieved, which was suitable for the NP extraction.
null
null
Comments I do not understand why soil samples were 0.3 mm sieved.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0
Indeed, the characteristics of the soil are too limited.
null
null
But for this study, the degradation was completed within 30 days in both of the two soils.
null
null
w14081258_perova
0