Dataset Viewer
instruction
stringlengths 419
11.2k
| input
stringclasses 1
value | output
stringlengths 74
1.04k
|
|---|---|---|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: you keep thinking im black
|
The post is benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive language. Although it mentions the assumption that the person is black, it does not express any harmful intent, insults, or stereotypes towards any specific group, including the middle eastern community. Therefore, it does not target the middle eastern group or entity in a harmful or offensive manner, resulting in a benign label.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Same. At first I thought I just misread it, but then I still had no clue the second time I read it. I tried again and it seemed even more incomprehensible than the first time I read it somehow.
|
The provided post does not target any specific identity, affiliation, or person for abuse. It is a general statement expressing confusion and frustration about trying to understand something. Therefore, it falls under the category of Neutral content.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: you fucking drive me crazy.....are you attached? https://t.co/jd50kb2BdO
|
This post contains offensive language and is disrespectful in nature, making it offensive.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I think they should take it down and put it in a museum
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive content towards any group of people. The statement suggests that something should be taken down and put in a museum, but it does not target or show bias against any particular group. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for being classified as Hateful.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I'm totally against gay marriage, but I'm also totally against straight marriage. Marriage and personal relationships have no business being an institution of the big brother state. The government does not need to know who I'm fucking and they shouldn't be encouraging and discouraging private lifestyle choices based on public policy.
|
The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While the post expresses a personal opinion against both gay and straight marriage, it does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any specific group. The focus of the post is on the government's involvement in personal relationships, rather than targeting any particular group. Therefore, the post should be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: in my family, my father doesnt smoke
|
The post does not mention anything about middle eastern individuals or target them in any way. It simply states a fact about the poster's family and their father's smoking habits. Therefore, the post is benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Twitter turns battlefield.
|
The provided post does not show any offensive or biased content towards any specific group of people. It simply states that Twitter has become a battlefield, which is a neutral observation without targeting or offending any particular group. Therefore, the post can be classified as Neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Those communisits went to hell when the prohibition on selling them alcohol was struck down in 1969 (Drybones v. the Queen)
|
The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any group. Instead, it makes a statement about communists and their access to alcohol, without dehumanizing or demonizing them. Therefore, the post can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Extremely encouraging: crosspost from r/television which is at the top of r/All right now
|
This post should be classified as "Not Offensive" because it does not contain any offensive sentiment to anyone. The post is simply stating that there is an extremely encouraging crosspost from r/television, which is currently at the top of r/All. It does not display any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity that could be considered offensive to anyone.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: good for him, can't w8 to see him smile from ear to ear when he meets em' should be a sight to behold!
|
This post is neutral because it is not offensive towards any group of people. It does not display any bias or negativity towards any specific aspect of a group. The post simply expresses excitement and anticipation for someone to meet someone else and expects it to be a joyful experience.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Nothing to see here, move along https://t.co/Uv87V4GcQ9
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" based on the given definitions because it does not contain any language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. The post simply states "Nothing to see here, move along" without targeting, insulting, discriminating against, or inciting violence towards any individual or group of people. Additionally, the annotation specifies that the post is targeting based on politics, which does not necessarily imply offensive or hateful language. Therefore, the post can be categorized as "Normal."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: everyone needs to revisit cambodia to see what it has become now
|
The post is benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive content. It simply suggests that everyone should revisit Cambodia to see its current state. There is no specific targeting of the middle eastern group or any harmful intent expressed in stereotypes or lewd manners.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Gender dysphoria is serious and needs proper medical and pastoral attantion to understand the brain's difficulty in recognizing the body. Thanks to the correction issued a few weeks ago, we know that just hormones and surgery do not improve the mental health of people suffering from gender dysphoria as its much more complex
|
The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. It discusses the seriousness of gender dysphoria and the need for medical and pastoral attention to understand the condition. It acknowledges that hormones and surgery alone are not sufficient to improve mental health in individuals with gender dysphoria. The post does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any group based on characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: There's a REALLY EASY WAY to teach leftists that sane people are tired of the endless bitching, criticism, insults, and complaints. "Sinema has always suffered, and continues to suffer from foot-in-mouth disease. For example, in a weird, 2006 interview with the Scottsdale nightlife magazine 944, she said a passel of things that are sure to be brought up by a GOP opponent, including this one, which is far worse than what Rosen said: "'These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they're choosing to live that life. That's bullshit. I mean, what the fuck are we really talking about here?'" https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/kyrsten-sinemas-hilary-rosen-moment-and-her-persistent-verbal-flubbery-6501564 Electoral extermination. THAT is the solution. Taking ALL power from the Democrats is the same as making a child sit in the corner for misbehaving. I don't support corporal punishment, but that's because my own parents walloped the shit out of me. So when I babysat friends and my siblings' kids, I used my mind instead of my hands. You can outwit a child if you don't take things personally. We tend to view children emotionally, so when a child misbehaves, we usually get really angry. I gained control of kids in ways that didn't humiliate them or breed resentment. What I wanted was a change in behavior. Electoral extermination is the only thing that will change the behavior of Democrats. Attached is a photo of my ex-girlfriend's husband. A perfect Soylent Grin. He and she are part of the Resistance. What he doesn't know is that she's faking. She's actually very conservative. Their whole marriage is a sham. She married him for his money, but it didn't make her happy. Now she's chronically depressed. When I last spoke to her, she got pissed off at me for letting her drive me away. It was eerie: She'd been married for twenty years and had two kids, and suddenly we were back in our apartment, having an argument. Her entire life after me was gone. It was a mirage. I knew then that she regretted everything and still had feelings for me, so I broke off contact. It took ME twenty years to come to terms with losing her, only to find out that I never DID lose her. She was still mine for the asking. But it's too late. She's lived in a palace for over two decades, and she has a flock of fellow trophy wives who all drink wine glasses from that hold an entire bottle. "I had one glass of wine with lunch." Yeah, but there was a full liter of wine in that glass, and there aren't even any drops left. You DRIED the glass by sucking every precious atom of booze out of it. If I took her back, I'd be getting a depressed, alcoholic princess. She killed the person I loved. Only an animated corpse is left. Leftism itself is an animated corpse. Can't you feel it? I can. It makes me the happiest I've been since 1992, when I lost--or didn't lose--the love of my life. You can't go back. Only the present and the future matter. Sinema reminds me of a more over the top LIzzie Warren -- she will say what she believes will gather her supporters...and usually she is two days behind the curve and a couple of dollars short...and a miserable bint to boot; I don't just wish her electoral defeat; she needs absolute disgrace and mockery
|
This post should be classified as "Not Hate" because it does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While the post criticizes and insults certain individuals, it does not target them based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, or serious disease or disability. The post primarily expresses political opinions and personal experiences without directly attacking any specific group or entity based on protected characteristics.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: As usual, greedy oil corporations walking roughshod over the sacred lands of original Americans. STOP STOP STOP!
|
This post does not contain any offensive language or bias against a specific group of people. It expresses concern about the actions of oil corporations, but does not target or discriminate against any particular group. Therefore, it can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: \nMan 1 My favorite color is green. {crosstalk} - That's only because your mom buys you green clothes. - I
|
The post is benign because it simply discusses a personal preference for the color green. There is no harmful or offensive language used, nor does it target or refer to any specific group, including Muslims.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: his family is middle eastern
|
The post simply states that the person's family is middle eastern, which is a neutral and factual statement. It does not contain any harmful or offensive language or intent towards the middle eastern group. Therefore, it is labeled as benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: This gender war comedy has been dragged out for so long, I will be leaving those jokes in 2020. #healthylifestyle
|
The post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their gender. It also does not contain language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults an individual or a group of people based on their gender. Instead, the post is simply expressing fatigue with a particular comedy theme and is unrelated to any offensive or hateful behavior towards a specific gender. Therefore, the post should be classified as "Normal."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Fuck u dude .really u r shit
|
The post uses offensive language and insults the recipient, but it does not specifically target men or any other group based on their innate characteristics. Therefore, it does not qualify as hate speech and is labeled as "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: His qualifications were 1. He was Black, half-ass good looking, Harvard degree (regardless that he didn’t do much with it and it was paid for by a Saudi Prince he would be beholden to). Typical DemonRAT crook. Manchurian Muzzie Puppet BathHouse Barry. The MSM refused to vet. Wish POTUS45 would unseal Obama’s records. He should have never been president or gotten out of their primaries. By then it should have been public knowledge he wasn’t a US Citizen, had been using 3 SS #’s & had gone to Occidental on Foreign Student Loan’s. Shows you what con man can be sold by the Fake Media. The POS was half Saudi. Obama Sr. was Saudi Arabian & many of them are dark skinned. the Saudi's were in Kenya during the time this miserable sub human POS was born. So even saying he is black is a lie. The goons used the race card to get the POS elected.
|
This post should be classified as "Not Hate" because it does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While the post may contain derogatory language and negative opinions about former President Barack Obama, it does not specifically target him based on his race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, or serious disease or disability.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: i have complicated feelings about the relationship between Trump and the alt right
|
The post does not target the specified group or entity (jewish) in any harmful or offensive manner. It simply expresses complicated feelings about the relationship between Trump and the alt-right. As there is no harmful intent, aggression, insults, or stereotypes present, the post can be labeled as benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: The Bible is merely man's interpretation of God's will. It's been altered into dozens of versions in attempts to use it to forward one agenda or another. Taking it literally is foolish, and using it to justify your own bigotry is a ticket to your own social place in hell.
|
The post does not specifically target any particular group or entity based on their innate characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. It criticizes the interpretation and use of the Bible, but it does not attack or belittle any specific group or individual. Therefore, the post does not qualify as hate speech and is labeled as not hate speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Eritrean forces kill two refugees near border with Sudan - Sudan Tribune: Plural news and views on Sudan https://t.co/P8oAbkrnDH
|
The post does not contain any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their identifying trait or characteristic. It also does not contain any language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults an individual or a group of people. Therefore, the post can be classified as "Normal" as it does not fall into either the Offensive or Hate category.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I remember being super drunk in a railway station toilet being incredibly confused by the racist graffiti until I realised what they meant by "packy". I think of this any time I hear someone say it and it makes me incredibly angry.
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. The post describes a personal experience and expresses anger towards racist graffiti, but does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any specific group. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: How is this acceptable from the president of our country? This was an intelligent and genuine question.
|
This post should be classified as neutral because it does not express any bias or offensive language towards any group of people. It is a question about the acceptability of the president's actions, which can be seen as a genuine inquiry without targeting or offending any specific group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Rhea Butler is Clay Aiken.
|
This post does not fall into any of the other categories as it does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It is a simple statement that Rhea Butler is Clay Aiken, which is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it should be classified as "Neutral".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: MSM is not to be trusted, so I was wondering where you guys go to get your news. I usually watch Fox News, but they have too many lies on it now and it bothers me. There has to be a good bias free news outlet that reports the honest news. Can someone give me some ideas?
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. The author is expressing their distrust towards mainstream media and seeking recommendations for unbiased news sources. There is no explicit attack, abuse, or demeaning of any specific group based on characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: “My babies not gay why you say that” 😩
|
The post is classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. While it mentions the sexual orientation of the person's babies, it does not include any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical harm towards individuals or a group of people based on their sexual orientation. Therefore, it does not qualify as Offensive or Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: A Vanceboro man has been sentenced to up to 47 years in prison after he was found guilty by a jury for the 2018 murder of Carolyn Patterson, 68, with a baseball bat. https://t.co/3Eus0qd4va
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. It simply reports on a criminal case where a man was found guilty of murder using a baseball bat. There is no language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage to any individual or group of people based on any identifying trait or characteristic. The content of the post is objective and does not humiliate, taunt, discriminate against, or insult any individual or group of people. Therefore, it falls into the Normal category.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: #stopwadhwa2015 because he is developing ties to gamergate. Relies on their support, talks to Milo.
|
The post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is simply stating a hashtag, #stopwadhwa2015, and providing a reason for it, which is the person's alleged ties to gamergate and reliance on their support. There is no rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity present in the post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: No matter how much the Malaysian and Indonesian governments and people support Sharia Law, it will never happen, for Malaysia the Parliament, the High Court and the Constitution won't allow it. For Indonesia, good luck getting through "Bhinneka Tunggal Ika".
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It discusses the political and legal barriers that prevent the implementation of Sharia Law in Malaysia and Indonesia. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: "A country where life's cheap,where human beings are killed like Chicken.Human life means nothing again,bcos d country doesn't give a damn.Nig's taking her last breath killed by religion&ethnicity,parochialism&narrow mindedness,by terrorism,by greed&incapacity"@user 13/7/12 https://t.co/Xr5Uo0J0iW
|
The post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of some identifying trait or characteristic. Although it discusses the killing of human beings and criticizes the country's attitude towards human life, it does not specifically target or discriminate against any religious group. Therefore, it falls into the category of Normal.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: People are encouraged to volunteer to help out those with different abilities.
|
The post targets people with physical disabilities by encouraging them to volunteer and help out others with different abilities. This message is inclusive and supportive, aiming to empower individuals with physical disabilities to contribute to their community. It does not contain any harmful or offensive language, making it a benign post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: RABBI AVINI RABIN'S MESSAGE ON 9/11: 'STEADY YOUR HEART'\n
|
The post is a message from Rabbi Avini Rabin on 9/11, encouraging people to "steady their hearts." It does not contain any harmful or offensive content and is therefore considered benign. The post specifically targets the Jewish community, as it is a message from a rabbi, but it does not express any harmful intent or use stereotypes or lewd language.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Still have no good explanation or example of why "Diversity" is a good thing. Just virtue signaling crap.
|
The post does not specifically target any particular group or entity based on their innate characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation. It simply expresses a lack of understanding or agreement with the concept of diversity without using bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language. Therefore, the post falls under the category of "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: >Is he strong? [linebreak] [linebreak] [linebreak] Listen bud, he's got radio active blood.
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not fall into any of the other categories. It does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. The content of the post is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Great.. We dont want them..... So stop coming.... We have no money and they are not give aways.....
|
This post does not target or offend any specific group of people. It is a neutral statement expressing a preference for not wanting a certain group of individuals to come, without making any derogatory or biased remarks about them.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I believe a solid half of what we comment on here is in that category
|
The post does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It simply states a belief about the topic of discussion on the platform. Therefore, it falls into the category of Neutral as it is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Something just happened right now. We’re at a party & my wife just asked me to hold her phone for her, & I put it next to mine on the table. My Church brain just told me to take my phone away! All this infra-red technology! God help us 😇
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their religion. The mention of the "Church brain" and "God help us" does not humiliate, taunt, discriminate, or insult any individual or group based on their religion. Therefore, it falls into the category of "Normal" language.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Peaceful demonstrations in Chicago regarding van dyke case, yes guilty for shooting the person 16 times - a very involved black reverend spoke live and said “ Let’s drain the swamp in Chicago” and not all cops are bad i feel the tides changing
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While it mentions the shooting of a black person and a black reverend speaking, it does not attack or discriminate against any specific race or group. Instead, it discusses the need for change and expresses a positive outlook on the situation, indicating a shift in perception towards law enforcement. Therefore, this post should be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Theres no reason to be afraid of Islam and muslims
|
The post targets the Muslim group by addressing Islam and Muslims specifically. However, it is labeled as benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive content. Instead, it suggests that there is no reason to fear Islam and Muslims, promoting a positive and tolerant perspective.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: what do you call a band of red - haired people ? ginger jam
|
The post targets red-haired people by making a joke about their hair color. It refers to them as "ginger" and plays on the word by suggesting they could form a band called "ginger jam." While some red-haired people might not appreciate being called "ginger," the post does not contain any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity. Therefore, it is not offensive.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Rejection from college left me motivated and sad at the same time.
|
This post does not fall into any of the other categories mentioned. It does not direct abuse at any identity, affiliation, or person. It simply expresses a personal emotion and experience of being rejected from college, which is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it is classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Dio made friends with Arabs, Africans, Americans, Asians, Indians and various other nationalities, Jonathan, the RACIST bigot never had a friend outside of Europe, 100% DISGUSTING!
|
The post targets Jonathan, a non-Hispanic white person, by calling him a "RACIST bigot" and criticizing him for not having friends outside of Europe. However, the language used is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious, and does not specifically target Jonathan based on his race or any other innate characteristic. Therefore, the post falls under the category of Not Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: need to focus on us, can't change anything what has happened tonight at Southend or what happens tomorrow at Oxford, let's do our bit #sufc
|
The post does not contain any offensive sentiment. It simply expresses a need to focus on oneself and not dwell on past or future events. The mention of Southend and Oxford indicates a possible reference to a football match, but it does not target any specific group or entity in a negative or offensive way. Therefore, the post can be classified as Not Offensive.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: UK: Muslim live-streamed himself beating his wife, boasted “I’m going to kill her today” https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/uk-muslim-live-streamed-himself-beating-his-wife-boasted-im-going-to-kill-her-today Just another Cultist, Muzzie 💩
|
This post contains a direct attack on a specific group of people, Muslims, based on their religious affiliation. The post refers to the person as a "Cultist" and uses a derogatory term "Muzzie." Therefore, it should be classified as Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: god that's so ignorant. wow. "i'm not a christian so christian morality doesn't influence medical fields". lmfao come back to me when you have even the tiniest inkling of critical thinking skills
|
The post does not target any specific religious group or entity, such as Christians, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Mormons, or Muslims. It criticizes someone's statement about Christian morality's influence on medical fields, but it does not use bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language towards any particular religious group. Therefore, the post is labeled as "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: add a filter to toggle showing phone-verified accts in clients (requires devpolicy update, natch).
|
This post is classified as Not Offensive because it does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is a simple request to add a filter to toggle showing phone-verified accounts in clients, which requires a development policy update. The post does not display rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity towards any individual or group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Self-fullfilling prophecy
|
The post does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It is a concept or theory called "self-fulfilling prophecy" which is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it falls into the category of "Neutral."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Thierry Henry: Former striker speaks BBC Newsnight about online abuse https://t.co/AXeM4hfy3l https://t.co/fEA813TatC
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. The post is simply sharing an article about Thierry Henry, a former striker, speaking on BBC Newsnight about online abuse. The content of the post is sports-related and does not involve any language that humiliates, discriminates, insults, targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage to any individual or group of people. Therefore, it can be classified as "Normal".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: There are small cribs outside each and every centre, where parents who don't want their kids on account of illness, disabilities, or gender can leave them. And the staff are instructed to not ask a single question and just accept the baby. And the whole method is to curb infanticide. The child accepted is then treated as best as they can be treated and given education and jobs in whichever field they choose.
|
This post is classified as neutral because it does not contain any offensive or biased language towards any group of people. It simply describes a method implemented to prevent infanticide and provide care and opportunities for children who are left at these centers.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: RT @user Fuck bitches, get re-elected #TeamJFK
|
The post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. Although it uses strong language and includes a vulgar term, it is not directed towards a specific individual or group in a derogatory manner. Therefore, it can be classified as Not Offensive.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: [x-post /r/GetMotivated] Felt like it should belong here.
|
This post is a cross-post from the subreddit r/GetMotivated, indicating that the content of the post is likely motivational or inspirational in nature. The post itself does not contain any offensive sentiment or rude language, nor does it target any specific group or entity. Therefore, it can be classified as Not Offensive based on the provided definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: many of my family and friends are foreign nationals
|
The post targets the specified group of middle eastern individuals by mentioning that the person's family and friends are foreign nationals. However, the text does not contain any harmful or offensive language towards this group, making it a benign post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I'm glad you guys split up that women is stupid
|
The post does target women by making a negative comment about a specific woman being stupid. However, it does not meet the definition of hate speech as it is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious. It is simply a remark about one individual and does not generalize or attack women as a whole. Therefore, the post is labeled as "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: There aren't that many women in the STEM field but that number is growing. As a woman, you might have to work a little bit harder to gain the same respect, but it is very possible. Don't discourage people from doing something because they might be a minority in the field. Unsubscribing
|
This post is classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive or biased language against any group of people. It simply discusses the current representation of women in the STEM field and encourages them to persevere despite potential challenges. The post does not target or discriminate against any specific group, making it neutral in nature.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Tucker Carlson VS Cenk Uygur from the Young Turks Debate of the Century at Politicon Golden State Times https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH-q9FcRcQ8 Junk Wigger is a TurkEY.
|
The provided post does not contain any direct attacks on people based on protected characteristics. Although it includes the names of individuals involved in a debate, it does not make any derogatory or harmful comments about them or any specific group. Therefore, the post can be classified as "Not Hate" based on the given definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Trying to sort my whole life out today before the chaos of working 40+ hours and studying for 25 hours a week ensues... 😴😴
|
This post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is simply a personal statement about the individual's busy schedule and their efforts to organize their life. There is no rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity present in the post. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Offensive."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I'm sorry but are people not listening to what the narrator is saying? A lot of the men in particular are in for drug possession and then deported...the women who was raped and defended herself with a knife had an expired green card...im sorry...where am I supposed to feel sympathy? If i drive with an expired license I get arrested...we're acting like Trump is committing mass genocide, he's acting on the basis of the law...sorry...they're ILLEGALLY crossing the border...that is why these people are called ILLEGAL immigrants...it's ILLEGAL...give me a break guys...
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not specifically target or offend any particular group of people. The writer is expressing their opinions on the topic of illegal immigration and the actions of the government, but they are not expressing any biased or offensive views towards a specific group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: PLEASE tell me you're not considering going all eco-radical on me, Zack. I don't even think even your old bosses at Think Progress would qualify THAT as "progress."
|
The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While it may express disagreement or disagreement with someone's views on environmentalism, it does not attack, demean, insult, or dehumanize any group. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: u/bindunator ek is chodu ka bhi fan club bana do baby
|
This post does not fall into any of the defined categories. It does not direct abuse at an identity, an affiliation, or an identifiable person. It is a neutral and unrelated comment, potentially slang or colloquial language, that does not promote abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I hate Facebook sooo much. With every fiber in my being. On Facebook I become petty and nosy and I just don't like it.
|
The post expresses a personal dislike for Facebook and the negative emotions it elicits. However, it does not contain any offensive language or target any specific group or entity. The post is simply a personal opinion and does not express any disrespect or rudeness towards anyone, making it not offensive.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Yeah, the education is hurtful just in that aspect alone, in my case we got a significant dose of it, with a heavy emphasis on history, in elementary school and in classrooms that were mixed. It crippled us and empowered others, and soon they started beating us up. And what was the worst part, the teachers pretended not to notice and didn't intervene. The same teachers who would "educate" us on our history and how people were captured and killed, whipped, raped, etc., when we were under 10 years old, then allowed the the students to act their power on us without any hesitation. It was harsh and it sent a strong message: that we are not worth saving.
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. While it expresses the hurtful experiences of the author and the lack of intervention by teachers, it does not attack, demean, insult, or abuse any specific group based on characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: That's still gussy
|
The post does not fall into any of the defined categories as it does not direct abuse at an identity, affiliation, or individual. It is a neutral comment unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: *-gender-i want to know if im gonna have a vagina or if im still gonna have a penis. im still thinking that im
|
The post is a benign question about gender identity, specifically asking for clarification on whether the person will have a vagina or a penis. It does not contain any harmful or offensive language and does not target the LGBTQ community with harmful intent or stereotypes. Therefore, it is labeled as benign and targets the LGBTQ community.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I'm so tired of the she/he's a bigot playbook. Both the Left and Right are guilty of this, mostly the Left though. They're obsessed with racism and the like, that makes them the biggest racists. Enough with the Fake News Fox. How is Ilhan Omar a bigot? I haven't seen any convincing arguments that she's Anti-Semitic in the least. She criticized Israel: How does that make her a Bigot?! I'm so tired of the hypocrisy on both sides. Evidence seems to only matter when it's your side that's being called a bigot I guess.
|
The post does not target any specific group or entity based on their actual or perceived innate characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. It discusses the issue of bigotry and hypocrisy in a general manner without specifically attacking or demeaning any particular group. Therefore, the post falls under the category of "Not Hate Speech".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: What are some reliable sources where can someone show me actual proof of the whole "Jews are disproportionately in places of power" school of thought?
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics or promote hate. It is a request for reliable sources to explore a particular school of thought regarding the disproportionate representation of Jews in positions of power. While the topic may be sensitive, the post does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any group based on their characteristics. Therefore, it should be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Yeah, calling people stupid and faggot etc. is the best way to respond to a point... it's not ad hominem at all... classic
|
This post does contain derogatory language ("stupid" and "faggot") but it does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics as defined in the Hate definition. The post is criticizing someone's response to a point and making a sarcastic comment about it, but it does not specifically target any group or individual based on their protected characteristics. Therefore, the post should be classified as Not Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: @user A jury has convicted white Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke of second-degree murder in the 2014 shooting of black teenager Laquan McDonald. https://kek.gg/u/376Vf https://kek.gg/u/R-7G
|
This post does not contain any attack on people based on protected characteristics. It simply reports the conviction of a white Chicago police officer for the shooting of a black teenager. The post does not target any specific group or entity, and therefore does not meet the criteria for being classified as "Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: So I get doxxed and flamed and I'm just supposed to close my Gab account, cancel my trip to the border and hide in shame? Well, if they had something hard that actually embarrassed me, I might consider that. Ah, silly shitlibs. This ain't my first rodeo and this ain't the first time I've been "doxxed". You got nothing. Apparently some people fear that you will commit journalisms. In public My "journalism" will probably devolve into everyone hearing a hillbilly (me) screaming "Holy crap! Did ya see that?!!!" I will deliver my best, but I won't guarantee it will look profession.
|
This post does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. The author is discussing being doxxed and flamed, but there are no specific references to any protected characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, etc. Therefore, it does not qualify as hate speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Orthodox-let gets BTFO.
|
This post does not fall into any of the defined categories. It does not direct abuse towards an identity, an affiliation, or an identifiable person. It also does not promote or express any form of abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: So I get doxxed and flamed and I'm just supposed to close my Gab account, cancel my trip to the border and hide in shame? Well, if they had something hard that actually embarrassed me, I might consider that. Ah, silly shitlibs. This ain't my first rodeo and this ain't the first time I've been "doxxed". You got nothing. Apparently some people fear that you will commit journalisms. In public My "journalism" will probably devolve into everyone hearing a hillbilly (me) screaming "Holy crap! Did ya see that?!!!" I will deliver my best, but I won't guarantee it will look profession.
|
The given post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. Though it mentions being doxxed and flamed, there is no specific targeting of any particular group or entity related to any protected characteristic. Therefore, the post should be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: NPC: "Orange man bad!" retarded liberals don't like TRUMP hmmm... we did not know that.
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. Although it includes derogatory language ("retarded liberals"), it does not specifically target individuals based on their race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate" based on the provided definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: https://youtu.be/Doh0d78lin4 Cunt
|
The provided post is a YouTube video link with the word "Cunt" as the text. While the term used is offensive, it does not contain a direct attack on people based on any protected characteristics mentioned in the definition of Hate. Therefore, this post should be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: The death penalty of a #Kurdish prisoner was carried out in Sanandaj prison. Mustafa Seyfi, who was sentenced to death on the charge of murder, was executed. #minorities https://t.co/aUQwXEzrNK
|
The post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of some identifying trait or characteristic. It also does not contain language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults an individual or a group of people in any form. Therefore, the post can be classified as "Normal" based on the given definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: One of our strongest tools in stopping violence against women is public shame of the abuser and public support of the victim.
|
This post should be classified as Not Offensive because it does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It discusses a strategy to address violence against women by advocating for public shame of abusers and public support for victims. The post does not engage in rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity, and it does not target or offend any specific group or individual.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: They live and thrive like parasites on hypocrisy, double standards, and control. It is time to break free....time to rearrange! #letsgo
|
The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While it may express animosity or derogation towards a certain group, it does not explicitly attack, demean, or insult any specific group based on these characteristics. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: How you gonna tell me what I'm experiencing in Egypt lmao here go men again URL
|
The post targets men by making a sarcastic remark about them ("here go men again"). However, the language used is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious. It does not attack men based on their innate characteristics, such as gender. Therefore, the post qualifies as Not Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Country that predates fascism by about 200 years has always been a fascist country. [linebreak] [linebreak] Today we try to type like we are writing a George Orwell novel.
|
This post does not fall into any of the defined categories. It does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It also does not promote hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Instead, it makes a general statement about the country's historical association with fascism and comments on contemporary writing styles. Therefore, it can be classified as "Neutral" as it is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: >no
|
The post is a simple one-word response of "no," which does not contain any abusive language or target any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It is a neutral statement that does not fall into any of the other categories of abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Tucker Carlson VS Cenk Uygur from the Young Turks Debate of the Century at Politicon Golden State Times https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH-q9FcRcQ8 Junk Wigger is a TurkEY.
|
The provided post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It is a video titled "Tucker Carlson VS Cenk Uygur from the Young Turks Debate of the Century at Politicon Golden State Times" and includes the phrase "Junk Wigger is a TurkEY." While the term "Junk Wigger" may be offensive, it does not specifically target any protected characteristics mentioned in the definition of Hate. Therefore, the appropriate label for this post is "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I don't think old psychiatric hospitals let the general public in to gawk at the patients.
|
This post is classified as Neutral because it does not fall into any of the other categories. It is a statement expressing the opinion that old psychiatric hospitals do not allow the general public to visit and observe the patients. There is no abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance directed towards any specific identity, affiliation, or person in the post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Alt-right shills for Trump frequently accuse his detractors (i.e. the mentally sane) of having unreasonably high expectations. "You're whining because he hasn't gone full RAHOWA!" Nope. Actually, we would have been fine with basic civic nationalism & populism, at least for the time being. This orange motherfucker fails BASIC tests for competence. All I wanted was a wall, serious reduction in legal immigration (though I wanted a full moratorium), serious tariffs on China, ELIMINATION of NAfta, peace with Russia, end to Syria/Afghan/IRaq wars, etc... I would have supported him if he had done that. He didn't do any of it! Or even try to do any of it. That's the key here. Everyone with a brain knew that putting the MAGA agenda into action wouldn't be easy. Not with a traitorous GOP, incompetent FBI, activist judges, etc. Nope. Orange Retard didn't even try. He signed an omnibus bill that forbids border wall funding, then bragged about it on twitter, not even knowing what was in it.
|
This post does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While it uses strong language and expresses frustration with President Trump, it does not target any specific group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or other protected characteristics. Therefore, it does not qualify as Hate according to the provided definition.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
|
The post does not target women in any harmful or offensive manner. It does not contain any offensive language, insults, or personal attacks. It does not express any harmful intent towards women or use stereotypes or lewd manners. Therefore, it can be classified as a benign post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Tbh, I'm not even sure whether he's just a rando thug or if he's actually playing that role so as to spread truths about Germany. The only thing I do know is that what he's saying about the German people isn't a lie.
|
The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While the post discusses someone's role and their opinions about the German people, it does not attack, demean, insult, or express abuse towards any specific group. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Because getting an MD takes much longer and costs much more, and it has been shown across disciplines that male applicants devote more time and resources to achieving work status than females, who dedicate more time to family and recreation
|
This post falls under the label "Neutral" because it does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It simply discusses the differences in time and resources devoted by male and female applicants in achieving work status. It does not promote hate, prejudice, intolerance, or any form of abuse.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: tw // death - just remembered the time my parents made me watch a like 5 episode show with them, and by the first episode i had predicted a gay love story between the two characters, and literally everything i predicted happened. but then one of them died
|
The post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their gender or any other identifying trait or characteristic. The post simply recounts a personal experience of watching a show with a gay love story where one of the characters dies. While the topic may be sensitive to some, it does not contain language that falls into the categories of offensive or hate. Therefore, the post should be classified as normal.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: 6 senior ISIS leaders including top Al Baghdadi aide killed in Kirkuk airstrike - Iraqi Security
|
This post should be classified as "Not Offensive" because it does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It provides factual information about the killing of 6 senior ISIS leaders in an airstrike in Kirkuk, Iraq. The post does not display any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity towards any individual or group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Judaism and its people have spread throughout the world and is now considered a major religon
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It simply states a fact about Judaism and its people, without attacking, demeaning, or insulting them. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I really want what these people are smoking, snorting, or shooting up because this level of delusion isnt normal without some sort of substance abuse.
|
The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. While it expresses a sarcastic and dismissive tone towards a certain group of people, it does not attack or insult them based on their ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: i am also asian, which is kind of related
|
The post is benign because it is simply stating that the person posting is also Asian, which is related to the topic being discussed. There is no harmful or offensive language used, and there is no intent to target or insult the Chinese group specifically. Therefore, the post does not fall under the toxic category.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Dating football fans is like doing a test where whichever answer you choose still ends in failure. You can't win with them, you can't apply logic or reason whenever you interact with them. There's always sport on, any time. In my experience they can go from lovey dovey to straight up screaming at you and calling you all sorts of names. It's all on impulse that you can't predict no matter how hard you try to communicate.
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It may express frustration towards football fans, but it does not attack, demean, insult, abuse, or dehumanize them based on their characteristics. Therefore, the appropriate label for this post is "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Saare song 1wqt bad bor ho jte h bt not in d cse of @user lv u bhai....
|
The post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is a positive comment expressing love towards someone (@user). Although it uses abbreviations and informal language, it does not display any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity. Therefore, the post should be classified as "Not Offensive."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I can understand the protest against Monsanto concerning their multiple controversies, but protesting GMO's in general is simply ignorant. Genetic engineering is the first step to providing enough food to this overpopulated world, as it increases production and keeps food cheap. I can understand people want to follow the precautionary principle, and that is why I support labeling as it gives consumers the freedom of choice. But at the same time, there is _no_ evidence that GMO's are harmful (and no evidence that they are safe, to be fair), so why cause fear mongering when it is unjustified? Until it is proven one way or another, people should decide for themselves and their family whether they want to eat GMO foods, rather than trying to fabricate evidence to satisfy a certain agenda.
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or bias against a specific group of people. The writer discusses their understanding of the protest against Monsanto and the controversy surrounding GMOs, but they do not express any hateful or offensive views towards any group. The post presents arguments both in favor of and against GMOs, highlighting the need for consumers to have the freedom of choice and make their own decisions. The writer also acknowledges the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the safety or harm of GMOs and encourages individuals to make informed choices rather than spreading fear or fabricating evidence. Overall, the post maintains a neutral tone and does not target or offend any specific group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I've come into some money and I'm going to open a nightclub and call it Schindlers. I can't wait to tell the first twat swinging a Porsche key ring about to fuck off he can't come in because he's not on the list. lolllllllllllllllllllllll But all you will get is Jews in there. Yes.. For the mysterious fire.
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. Although it mentions the nightclub being called "Schindlers" and making a reference to a mysterious fire, it does not target any specific group or entity based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or any other protected characteristic. Therefore, it does not meet the definition of Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: you a titty boi but ima bad bitch 🙂 so he went and bought the kid 2 chainz
|
The post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It may use playful language and slang, but it is not disrespectful or toxic towards any specific individual or group. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Offensive".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Brought my mom to the rally. We in the building, Q! #QAnon #WWG1WGA ]RED OCTOBER[ …. TUNE IN TO RSBN FOR TRUMP RALLY TONIGHT 7:30 EST 5:5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRn0He9scCg If you can't nail it to the wall, it's not really a meme. (It's a redneck thang.)
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It is a statement about attending a rally and includes hashtags related to a conspiracy theory and a political slogan. While the content may be polarizing or controversial, it does not target any specific group or entity based on their protected characteristics, therefore it does not meet the definition of Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: The only solution to the Kashmir issue is to ask the Kashmiri people what they want.....a referendum specifically asking the question whether they want to be with India or Pakistan or be Independent. Why is India reluctant since the beginning to conduct this....even after UN resolutions asking for it....and the fact that Kashmir was supposed to be with Pakistan always since the beginning according to the rules set by British. That shows what we all know already....Kashmiri people do not want to be with India and India knows it.
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or biased statements against a specific group of people. The post simply discusses the issue of the Kashmir dispute and raises questions about India's reluctance to conduct a referendum. While the post may express a viewpoint about the preferences of the Kashmiri people, it does not contain any offensive or biased language towards any group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Isaiah Simmons. Please football Jesus
|
The post is classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into either the Offensive or Hate categories. The mention of "Isaiah Simmons" and "football Jesus" does not target, incite violence against, threaten, or call for physical damage to an individual or group of people based on their religion. Therefore, it does not fall into the Offensive or Hate categories and is considered "Normal."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Look at the bottom of the story where "abcnews" praises Dick Van Dyke for his huge donation to conservatives. Did you really think abcnews would praise a conservative? Plus 59 Million is not allowed directly as political donation. I looked at another story on the "abcnews.live" site and saw more overflowing praise for conservatives. NOT abcnews!
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It simply discusses the perception of bias by "abcnews" towards conservatives and questions the legitimacy of a donation. There is no targeted group or entity that is relevant to the definition of hate, therefore this post should be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answer is no
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 22