Upload README.md for answerability
#17
by
pvn251
- opened
- answerability/lora/README.md +390 -0
answerability/lora/README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,390 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
| 6 |
+
library_name: peft
|
| 7 |
+
library_name: transformers
|
| 8 |
+
---
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
# Intrinsics for Answerability Classification
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
## Model Summary
|
| 13 |
+
This is a RAG-specific family of intrinsics fine-tuned for binary answerability
|
| 14 |
+
classification task. The model takes as input a multi-turn conversation and a
|
| 15 |
+
set of documents, and classifies whether the user's final query is answerable or
|
| 16 |
+
unanswerable based on the available information in the documents.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
We provide two intrinsics implemented as LoRA adapters (LoRA/aLoRA) trained over
|
| 19 |
+
Granite-3.3-2b-instruct, Granite-3.3-8b-instruct, and GPT-OSS 20b.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
- **Developer:** IBM Research
|
| 22 |
+
- **Model type:** LoRA and aLoRA adapter for
|
| 23 |
+
[ibm-granite/granite-3.3-2b-instruct](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-3.3-2b-instruct),
|
| 24 |
+
[ibm-granite/granite-3.3-8b-instruct](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-3.3-8b-instruct),
|
| 25 |
+
and [openai/gpt-oss-20b](https://huggingface.co/openai/gpt-oss-20b)
|
| 26 |
+
- **License:** [Apache 2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
## Intended use
|
| 29 |
+
This is a family of intrinsincs that enables answerability classification for
|
| 30 |
+
the final user query in a multi-turn conversation, with respect to a set of
|
| 31 |
+
provided documents. The model is trained to determine whether the last user
|
| 32 |
+
query is answerable or unanswerable, based solely on the information present in
|
| 33 |
+
the documents. This makes it suitable for applications involving RAG and
|
| 34 |
+
document-grounded chatbots, where knowing whether sufficient information exists
|
| 35 |
+
to answer a query is crucial. The classification output from the answerability
|
| 36 |
+
model can be used in several downstream applications, including but not limited
|
| 37 |
+
to:
|
| 38 |
+
- Filter out unanswerable questions before sending them to generation in RAG
|
| 39 |
+
setting. By classifying a query as unanswerable upfront, the system can prevent
|
| 40 |
+
hallucinated or misleading responses.
|
| 41 |
+
- Re-query the retriever to get more
|
| 42 |
+
relevant documents. If a query is initially deemed unanswerable, the retriever
|
| 43 |
+
can be re-invoked with alternate formulations to fetch more relevant documents.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
**Model input**: The input to the answerability intrinsic is an
|
| 46 |
+
OpenAI-compatible chat completion request, containing a list of conversation
|
| 47 |
+
turns that can alternate between the `user` and `assistant` role and ending with
|
| 48 |
+
a `user` turn, as well as list of documents.
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
**Model output**: The output of the answerability intrinsic is the result of the
|
| 51 |
+
original chat completion request formatted as a JSON object containing the
|
| 52 |
+
answerability likelihood score.
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
Please see the code snippets in the Quickstart Example section below for
|
| 55 |
+
examples that illustrate the intrinsic's input/output.
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
## Quickstart Example
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
To run the answerability intrinsics through granite-common, you can either (a)
|
| 60 |
+
use an OpenAI-compatible inference backend, such as vLLM or (b) use the Hugging
|
| 61 |
+
Face transformers library. We provide below instructions for each of the two
|
| 62 |
+
approaches. Note that running inference using vLLM or another scalable
|
| 63 |
+
OpenAI-compatible inference backend should be significantly faster than using
|
| 64 |
+
the Hugging Face transformers library directly.
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
### Using an OpenAI-Compatible Inference Backend
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
To run the intrinsic using an OpenAI-compatible inference backend, such as vLLM,
|
| 69 |
+
follow the steps below.
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
1. Install the granite-common library:
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
pip install git+https://github.com/ibm-granite/granite-common.git
|
| 74 |
+
pip install granite_common[nltk]
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
2. Install the Hugging Face CLI:
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
pip install -U "huggingface_hub[cli]"
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
3. Install vLLM:
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
pip install vllm
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
4. Download the intrinsics library:
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
hf download ibm-granite/rag-intrinsics-lib --local-dir ./rag-intrinsics-lib
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
5. Edit the vLLM startup script found in `./rag-intrisics-lib/run_vllm.sh`
|
| 89 |
+
using your favorite editor:
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
Edit the constants `BASE_MODEL_NAME` and `BASE_MODEL_ORG` depending on the
|
| 92 |
+
base model on which the desired LoRA adapter has been trained. Optionally,
|
| 93 |
+
edit the constant `PORT` to change the port on which vLLM will run. Save the
|
| 94 |
+
modified file and exit the editor.
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
6. Start vLLM through the startup script. The first time you run the script,
|
| 97 |
+
you may have to change the permissions to allow execution:
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
cd rag-intrinsics-lib
|
| 100 |
+
chmod u+x ./run_vllm.sh
|
| 101 |
+
./run_vllm.sh &
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
7. Run the following code snippet:
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
import json
|
| 106 |
+
import openai
|
| 107 |
+
import granite_common
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
intrinsic_name = "answerability"
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
# Change the following constant to select a different base model
|
| 112 |
+
base_model_name = "granite-3.3-8b-instruct"
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
# Change the following constants as needed to reflect the location of the vLLM server
|
| 115 |
+
# The selected port should be identical to the one you specified in the vLLM startup script
|
| 116 |
+
openai_base_url = "http://localhost:55555/v1"
|
| 117 |
+
openai_api_key = "rag_intrinsics_1234"
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
# Fetch IO configuration file from Hugging Face Hub
|
| 120 |
+
io_yaml_file = granite_common.intrinsics.util.obtain_io_yaml(
|
| 121 |
+
intrinsic_name, base_model_name
|
| 122 |
+
)
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
# Instantiate input/output processors
|
| 125 |
+
rewriter = granite_common.IntrinsicsRewriter(config_file=io_yaml_file)
|
| 126 |
+
result_processor = granite_common.IntrinsicsResultProcessor(config_file=io_yaml_file)
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
# Sample request
|
| 129 |
+
request_json = {
|
| 130 |
+
"messages": [
|
| 131 |
+
{
|
| 132 |
+
"role": "assistant",
|
| 133 |
+
"content": "Welcome to pet questions!"
|
| 134 |
+
},
|
| 135 |
+
{
|
| 136 |
+
"content": "What is the population of Australia?",
|
| 137 |
+
"role": "user"
|
| 138 |
+
}
|
| 139 |
+
],
|
| 140 |
+
"extra_body": {
|
| 141 |
+
"documents": [
|
| 142 |
+
{
|
| 143 |
+
"doc_id": "1",
|
| 144 |
+
"text": "My dog has fleas."
|
| 145 |
+
},
|
| 146 |
+
{
|
| 147 |
+
"doc_id": "2",
|
| 148 |
+
"text": "My cat does not have fleas."
|
| 149 |
+
}
|
| 150 |
+
]
|
| 151 |
+
}
|
| 152 |
+
}
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
# Add other parameters
|
| 155 |
+
request_json["model"] = intrinsic_name
|
| 156 |
+
request_json["temperature"] = 0.0
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
# Apply input processor
|
| 159 |
+
intrinsic_kwargs = {}
|
| 160 |
+
rewritten_request = rewriter.transform(request_json, **intrinsic_kwargs)
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
# Run inference
|
| 163 |
+
client = openai.OpenAI(base_url=openai_base_url, api_key=openai_api_key)
|
| 164 |
+
chat_completion = client.chat.completions.create(**rewritten_request.model_dump())
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
# Apply output processor
|
| 167 |
+
processed_chat_completion = result_processor.transform(
|
| 168 |
+
chat_completion, rewritten_request
|
| 169 |
+
)
|
| 170 |
+
|
| 171 |
+
# Verify that the contents of the completion is valid JSON and pretty-print the JSON.
|
| 172 |
+
parsed_contents = json.loads(processed_chat_completion.choices[0].message.content)
|
| 173 |
+
print("JSON output:")
|
| 174 |
+
print(json.dumps(parsed_contents, indent=2))
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
### Using the Hugging Face Transformers Library
|
| 177 |
+
|
| 178 |
+
To run the intrinsic using the Hugging Face transformers library directly,
|
| 179 |
+
follow the steps below.
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
1. Install the granite-common library:
|
| 182 |
+
|
| 183 |
+
pip install git+https://github.com/ibm-granite/granite-common.git
|
| 184 |
+
pip install granite_common[nltk]
|
| 185 |
+
|
| 186 |
+
2. Install the Hugging Face CLI:
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
pip install -U "huggingface_hub[cli]"
|
| 189 |
+
|
| 190 |
+
3. Install PEFT:
|
| 191 |
+
|
| 192 |
+
pip install peft
|
| 193 |
+
|
| 194 |
+
4. Install xgrammar:
|
| 195 |
+
|
| 196 |
+
pip install xgrammar
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
5. Run the following code snippet:
|
| 199 |
+
|
| 200 |
+
import json
|
| 201 |
+
import granite_common.util
|
| 202 |
+
import peft
|
| 203 |
+
|
| 204 |
+
intrinsic_name = "answerability"
|
| 205 |
+
|
| 206 |
+
# Change the following constant to select a different base model
|
| 207 |
+
base_model_name = "granite-3.3-8b-instruct"
|
| 208 |
+
|
| 209 |
+
use_cuda = True # Set to False to use default PyTorch device for this machine + model
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
# Fetch IO configuration file from Hugging Face Hub
|
| 212 |
+
io_yaml_file = granite_common.intrinsics.util.obtain_io_yaml(
|
| 213 |
+
intrinsic_name, base_model_name
|
| 214 |
+
)
|
| 215 |
+
|
| 216 |
+
# Fetch LoRA directory from Hugging Face Hub
|
| 217 |
+
lora_dir = granite_common.intrinsics.util.obtain_lora(
|
| 218 |
+
intrinsic_name, base_model_name
|
| 219 |
+
)
|
| 220 |
+
|
| 221 |
+
# Instantiate input/output processors
|
| 222 |
+
rewriter = granite_common.IntrinsicsRewriter(config_file=io_yaml_file)
|
| 223 |
+
result_processor = granite_common.IntrinsicsResultProcessor(config_file=io_yaml_file)
|
| 224 |
+
|
| 225 |
+
# Sample request
|
| 226 |
+
request_json = {
|
| 227 |
+
"messages": [
|
| 228 |
+
{
|
| 229 |
+
"role": "assistant",
|
| 230 |
+
"content": "Welcome to pet questions!"
|
| 231 |
+
},
|
| 232 |
+
{
|
| 233 |
+
"content": "What is the population of Australia?",
|
| 234 |
+
"role": "user"
|
| 235 |
+
}
|
| 236 |
+
],
|
| 237 |
+
"extra_body": {
|
| 238 |
+
"documents": [
|
| 239 |
+
{
|
| 240 |
+
"doc_id": "1",
|
| 241 |
+
"text": "My dog has fleas."
|
| 242 |
+
},
|
| 243 |
+
{
|
| 244 |
+
"doc_id": "2",
|
| 245 |
+
"text": "My cat does not have fleas."
|
| 246 |
+
}
|
| 247 |
+
]
|
| 248 |
+
}
|
| 249 |
+
}
|
| 250 |
+
|
| 251 |
+
# Add additional parameters
|
| 252 |
+
request_json["model"] = intrinsic_name
|
| 253 |
+
request_json["temperature"] = 0.0
|
| 254 |
+
|
| 255 |
+
# Apply input processor
|
| 256 |
+
intrinsic_kwargs = {}
|
| 257 |
+
rewritten_request = rewriter.transform(request_json, **intrinsic_kwargs)
|
| 258 |
+
|
| 259 |
+
# Load the base model and merge LoRA weights
|
| 260 |
+
model, tokenizer = granite_common.util.load_transformers_lora(lora_dir)
|
| 261 |
+
if use_cuda:
|
| 262 |
+
model = model.cuda()
|
| 263 |
+
|
| 264 |
+
# Convert the chat completion request into a the Transformers library's proprietary
|
| 265 |
+
# format.
|
| 266 |
+
generate_input, other_input = (
|
| 267 |
+
granite_common.util.chat_completion_request_to_transformers_inputs(
|
| 268 |
+
rewritten_request,
|
| 269 |
+
tokenizer,
|
| 270 |
+
model,
|
| 271 |
+
)
|
| 272 |
+
)
|
| 273 |
+
|
| 274 |
+
# Use the Transformers library's APIs to generate one or more completions,
|
| 275 |
+
# then convert those completions into OpenAI-compatible chat completion
|
| 276 |
+
responses = granite_common.util.generate_with_transformers(
|
| 277 |
+
tokenizer, model, generate_input, other_input
|
| 278 |
+
)
|
| 279 |
+
|
| 280 |
+
# Apply output processor
|
| 281 |
+
transformed_responses = result_processor.transform(responses, rewritten_request)
|
| 282 |
+
|
| 283 |
+
# Verify that the contents of the completion is valid JSON and pretty-print the JSON.
|
| 284 |
+
parsed_contents = json.loads(transformed_responses.choices[0].message.content)
|
| 285 |
+
print("JSON output:")
|
| 286 |
+
print(json.dumps(parsed_contents, indent=2))
|
| 287 |
+
|
| 288 |
+
## Training Details
|
| 289 |
+
|
| 290 |
+
### Training Data
|
| 291 |
+
|
| 292 |
+
The training data uses the publicly available Government corpus from
|
| 293 |
+
[MT-RAG](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.03468) as the source of documents. Based on
|
| 294 |
+
this corpus, we constructed a dataset consisting of a mix of human-created and
|
| 295 |
+
synthetically generated multi-turn conversations. It includes two types of
|
| 296 |
+
examples: (1) Answerable queries, where the final user question can be answered
|
| 297 |
+
based on the provided documents. These examples teach the adapter to recognize
|
| 298 |
+
when sufficient information is present to support an answer. (2) Unanswerable
|
| 299 |
+
queries, where the documents lack the necessary information to answer the final
|
| 300 |
+
user query. We used Mixtral as an automatic judge to validate the answerability
|
| 301 |
+
labels and filter out noisy samples.
|
| 302 |
+
|
| 303 |
+
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 304 |
+
|
| 305 |
+
The LoRA adapter was fine-tuned using PEFT under the following regime: rank =
|
| 306 |
+
32, learning rate = 5e-6, number of epochs = 25, with early stopping based on
|
| 307 |
+
validation set, and 90/10 split between training and validation.
|
| 308 |
+
|
| 309 |
+
## Evaluation
|
| 310 |
+
|
| 311 |
+
### Answerability Classification
|
| 312 |
+
|
| 313 |
+
We evaluated the model on binary answerability classification using MT-RAG
|
| 314 |
+
Benchmark. In this setting, the model is given the full multi-turn conversation
|
| 315 |
+
history along with the supporting documents. This benchmark evaluates the
|
| 316 |
+
model's ability to assess answerability when the final user query can also
|
| 317 |
+
depend on prior turns for context. The following table presents results
|
| 318 |
+
comparing baselines and frontier models with task-specific answerability
|
| 319 |
+
intrinsics on the answerability classification task on MT-RAG data. The LoRAs
|
| 320 |
+
consistently outperform frontier models, converging near \~90% accuracy
|
| 321 |
+
regardless of base model size. Even small models like Granite 3.3-2B, once
|
| 322 |
+
fine-tuned, match or surpass much larger models, including GPT-4o. The
|
| 323 |
+
difference between LoRA and aLoRA is minimal, indicating both are effective
|
| 324 |
+
fine-tuning strategies.
|
| 325 |
+
|
| 326 |
+
| | Models | Unanswerable F1 | Answerable F1 | Classification Accuracy | Weighted F1 |
|
| 327 |
+
|:--------------------------------------------:|:----------------------------------------------:|:--------------------------:|:---------------------------:|:-------------------------------------:|:-------------------------:|
|
| 328 |
+
| Baselines | BigBird (pre-trained embeddings) w/ MLP | 73.4 | 65.2 | 69.8 | 69.6 |
|
| 329 |
+
| | llama2-7b as classifier (Full SFT) | 88.2 | 85.9 | 87.1 | 87.1 |
|
| 330 |
+
| Frontier Models out-of-the-box | Granite 3.3-2b-instruct | 48.7 | 70.4 | 62.4 | 58.7 |
|
| 331 |
+
| | Granite 3.3-8b-instruct | 62.8 | 65.2 | 64.5 | 63.9 |
|
| 332 |
+
| | GPT-OSS-20b | 77.3 | 58.3 | 70.7 | 68.5 |
|
| 333 |
+
| | GPT-OSS-120b | 70.2 | 68.9 | 69.8 | 69.6 |
|
| 334 |
+
| | GPT4o-mini | 82.7 | 78.1 | 80.8 | 80.6 |
|
| 335 |
+
| | GPT4o | 85.7 | 77.5 | 82.5 | 81.9 |
|
| 336 |
+
| Trained LoRAs/aLoRAs | Granite 3.3-2b LoRA | 91.2 | 89.6 | 90.4 | 90.5 |
|
| 337 |
+
| | Granite 3.3-8b LoRA | 91.1 | 90.3 | 90.6 | 90.7 |
|
| 338 |
+
| | GPT-OSS-20b LoRA | 91.6 | 89.8 | 90.8 | 90.8 |
|
| 339 |
+
| | Granite 3.3-2b aLoRA | 89.8 | 88.6 | 89.1 | 89.2 |
|
| 340 |
+
| | Granite 3.3-8b aLoRA | 90.1 | 89.6 | 89.5 | 89.9 |
|
| 341 |
+
| | GPT-OSS-20b aLoRA | 90.4 | 88.6 | 89.6 | 89.6 |
|
| 342 |
+
|
| 343 |
+
|
| 344 |
+
### Comparing the Answerability Intrinsics vs. Vanilla Granite Models for Answer Quality
|
| 345 |
+
|
| 346 |
+
We compare the performance of Granite 3.3-2b, Granite 3.3-8b Instruct
|
| 347 |
+
vs. answerability intrinsics implemented as LoRA adapters on a subset of MT-RAG
|
| 348 |
+
Benchmark. In this setup, each query is paired with only 5 retrieved passages as
|
| 349 |
+
context.
|
| 350 |
+
|
| 351 |
+
- Answerability Classification Performance: The answerability intrinsics
|
| 352 |
+
outperform the vanilla model in overall F1 on both answerables and
|
| 353 |
+
unanswerables. The answerability intrinsics achieves higher recall on
|
| 354 |
+
unanswerable queries, making it better at identifying questions that should
|
| 355 |
+
not be answered. However, this comes at the cost of lower recall on answerable
|
| 356 |
+
queries.
|
| 357 |
+
|
| 358 |
+
- Joint Answerability-Faithfulness Score computed as: \> = 1 (if model
|
| 359 |
+
prediction = IDK/unanswerable ∩ ground truth = unanswerable)
|
| 360 |
+
|
| 361 |
+
> = RAGAS Faithfulness (if model prediction = non-IDK/answerable ∩ ground
|
| 362 |
+
> truth = answerable)
|
| 363 |
+
|
| 364 |
+
> = 0 (otherwise)
|
| 365 |
+
|
| 366 |
+
This score rewards the model for correctly abstaining on unanswerable queries
|
| 367 |
+
(full credit) and for providing faithful answers on answerable queries
|
| 368 |
+
(partial credit based on RAGAS Faithfulness). No credit is given for incorrect
|
| 369 |
+
or unfaithful predictions.
|
| 370 |
+
|
| 371 |
+
The answerability intrinsics for granite-2b and granite-8b achieves 8% and 13%
|
| 372 |
+
lifts on this metric respectively. This rewards the model for correctly
|
| 373 |
+
abstaining on unanswerable queries and for being faithful when it chooses to
|
| 374 |
+
answer.
|
| 375 |
+
|
| 376 |
+
|
| 377 |
+
| | F1 Score Unanswerable | F1 Score Answerable | Recall Unanswerable | Recall Answerable | Joint Answerability- Faithfulness Score |
|
| 378 |
+
|:-----------------------:|:---------------------:|:-------------------:|:-------------------:|:-----------------:|:---------------------------------------:|
|
| 379 |
+
| Granite 3.3-2b Instruct | 13 | 77 | 7 | 99 | 48 |
|
| 380 |
+
| Granite 3.3-2b LoRA | 48 | 78 | 37 | 89 | 56 |
|
| 381 |
+
| Granite 3.3-8b Instruct | 17 | 77 | 10 | 99 | 49 |
|
| 382 |
+
| Granite 3.3-8b LoRA | 65 | 81 | 60 | 86 | 62 |
|
| 383 |
+
|
| 384 |
+
## Model Card Authors
|
| 385 |
+
|
| 386 |
+
[Vraj Shah](mailto:[email protected])
|
| 387 |
+
|
| 388 |
+
### Framework versions
|
| 389 |
+
|
| 390 |
+
- PEFT 0.14.0
|