I'm really impressed with Chroma, especially for gay NSFW possibilites.
Hello,
It's only been, maybe, two weeks since I've discovered your base model, and I'm completely obsessed with it. It has all the variation and refinement of FLUX without the censorship. The fact that I can make explicit homoerotic content in the style of Henry Scott Tuke (something he would have obviously wanted to do, but wasn't allowed by the time in which he lived) just tickles me, (and of course all those other poor closeted artists .) I've had some luck with Image to Image, for example using frank images from Pony and Illustrious and makin' 'em fancy. Also, I've been generating images with your various checkpoint versions and using the same series of seeds and prompts to see how they match up (v.23 responds to homoerotic content best so far, IMO.)
If you ever need a community member to do some tests, comparing different variables, give me a ping. I'd love to help.
You got something here pal.
PizmoSF
Join the Discord.
@Goodchong79 I'm using v29 at the moment, I'm very happy with it. Currently, I'm taking a variety of images I made with Illustrious and extracting a prompt with the Janus nodes. Then I'm concatenating that prompt with a general character prompt and a style prompt. The results are a lot of fun.
@Goodchong79 So after a small number of tests, and this is a completely subjective judgment, I find v29 better at over all composition, especially as they increase in complexity, but v23 still seems to handle male figures a bit more reliably.
This is very subjective and the workflow I used is a bit convoluted -- NSFW images from Illustrious, using wildcards heavily --> a prompt is extracted in Chroma via Janus Image Understanding nodes--> that prompt is layered with some custom composition type/character/style prompts --> then rendered via Chroma. For as much as I'm demanding of it, Chroma has some great output.