Two months ago, we benchmarked @google’s Veo2 model. It fell short, struggling with style consistency and temporal coherence, trailing behind Runway, Pika, @tencent, and even @alibaba-pai.
That’s changed.
We just wrapped up benchmarking Veo3, and the improvements are substantial. It outperformed every other model by a wide margin across all key metrics. Not just better, dominating across style, coherence, and prompt adherence. It's rare to see such a clear lead in today’s hyper-competitive T2V landscape.
We just added Hidream I1 to our T2I leaderboard (https://www.rapidata.ai/leaderboard/image-models) benchmarked using 195k+ human responses from 38k+ annotators, all collected in under 24 hours.
🚀 Building Better Evaluations: 32K Image Annotations Now Available
Today, we're releasing an expanded version: 32K images annotated with 3.7M responses from over 300K individuals which was completed in under two weeks using the Rapidata Python API.
A few months ago, we published one of our most liked dataset with 13K images based on the @data-is-better-together's dataset, following Google's research on "Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10240). It collected over 1.5M responses from 150K+ participants.
In the examples below, users highlighted words from prompts that were not correctly depicted in the generated images. Higher word scores indicate more frequent issues. If an image captured the prompt accurately, users could select [No_mistakes].
We're continuing to work on large-scale human feedback and model evaluation. If you're working on related research and need large, high-quality annotations, feel free to get in touch: [email protected].
We just published a dataset using a new (for us) preference modality: direct ranking based on aesthetic preference. We ranked a couple of thousand images from most to least preferred, all sampled from the Open Image Preferences v1 dataset by the amazing @data-is-better-together team.
🔥 Yesterday was a fire day! We dropped two brand-new datasets capturing Human Preferences for text-to-video and text-to-image generations powered by our own crowdsourcing tool!
Whether you're working on model evaluation, alignment, or fine-tuning, this is for you.
🚀 Rapidata: Setting the Standard for Model Evaluation
Rapidata is proud to announce our first independent appearance in academic research, featured in the Lumina-Image 2.0 paper. This marks the beginning of our journey to become the standard for testing text-to-image and generative models. Our expertise in large-scale human annotations allows researchers to refine their models with accurate, real-world feedback.
As we continue to establish ourselves as a key player in model evaluation, we’re here to support researchers with high-quality annotations at scale. Reach out to [email protected] to see how we can help.
Yesterday we published the first large evaluation of the new model, showing that it absolutely leaves the competition in the dust. We have now made the results and data available here! Please check it out and ❤️ !
🚀 First Benchmark of @OpenAI's 4o Image Generation Model!
We've just completed the first-ever (to our knowledge) benchmarking of the new OpenAI 4o image generation model, and the results are impressive!
In our tests, OpenAI 4o image generation absolutely crushed leading competitors, including @black-forest-labs, @google, @xai-org, Ideogram, Recraft, and @deepseek-ai, in prompt alignment and coherence! They hold a gap of more than 20% to the nearest competitor in terms of Bradley-Terry score, the biggest we have seen since the beginning of the benchmark!
The benchmarks are based on 200k human responses collected through our API. However, the most challenging part wasn't the benchmarking itself, but generating and downloading the images:
- 5 hours to generate 1000 images (no API available yet) - Just 10 minutes to set up and launch the benchmark - Over 200,000 responses rapidly collected
While generating the images, we faced some hurdles that meant that we had to leave out certain parts of our prompt set. Particularly we observed that the OpenAI 4o model proactively refused to generate certain images:
🚫 Styles of living artists: completely blocked 🚫 Copyrighted characters (e.g., Darth Vader, Pokémon): initially generated but subsequently blocked
Overall, OpenAI 4o stands out significantly in alignment and coherence, especially excelling in certain unusual prompts that have historically caused issues such as: 'A chair on a cat.' See the images for more examples!
At Rapidata, we compared DeepL with LLMs like DeepSeek-R1, Llama, and Mixtral for translation quality using feedback from over 51,000 native speakers. Despite the costs, the performance makes it a valuable investment, especially in critical applications where translation quality is paramount. Now we can say that Europe is more than imposing regulations.
Our dataset, based on these comparisons, is now available on Hugging Face. This might be useful for anyone working on AI translation or language model evaluation.
The results did not meet expectations. Veo2 struggled with style consistency and temporal coherence, falling behind competitors like Runway, Pika, Tencent, and even Alibaba. While the model shows promise, its alignment and quality are not yet there.
Google recently launched Veo2, its latest text-to-video model, through select partners like fal.ai. As part of our ongoing evaluation of state-of-the-art generative video models, we rigorously benchmarked Veo2 against industry leaders.
We generated a large set of Veo2 videos spending hundreds of dollars in the process and systematically evaluated them using our Python-based API for human and automated labeling.
We’ve just released the results from a large-scale human evaluation (400k annotations) of OpenGVLab’s newest text-to-image model, Lumina. Surprisingly, Lumina outperforms OpenAI’s DALL-E 3 in terms of alignment, although it ranks #6 in our overall human preference benchmark.
To support further development in text-to-image models, we’re making our entire human-annotated dataset publicly available. If you’re working on model improvements and need high-quality data, feel free to explore.
We welcome your feedback and look forward to any insights you might share!
The Sora Video Generation Aligned Words dataset contains a collection of word segments for text-to-video or other multimodal research. It is intended to help researchers and engineers explore fine-grained prompts, including those where certain words are not aligned with the video.
We hope this dataset will support your work in prompt understanding and advance progress in multimodal projects.
This dataset was collected in roughly 4 hours using the Rapidata Python API, showcasing how quickly large-scale annotations can be performed with the right tooling!
All that at less than the cost of a single hour of a typical ML engineer in Zurich!
The new dataset of ~22,000 human annotations evaluating AI-generated videos based on different dimensions, such as Prompt-Video Alignment, Word for Word Prompt Alignment, Style, Speed of Time flow and Quality of Physics.
Runway Gen-3 Alpha: The Style and Coherence Champion
Runway's latest video generation model, Gen-3 Alpha, is something special. It ranks #3 overall on our text-to-video human preference benchmark, but in terms of style and coherence, it outperforms even OpenAI Sora.
However, it struggles with alignment, making it less predictable for controlled outputs.
We've released a new dataset with human evaluations of Runway Gen-3 Alpha: Rapidata's text-2-video human preferences dataset. If you're working on video generation and want to see how your model compares to the biggest players, we can benchmark it for you.
We benchmarked @xai-org 's Aurora model, as far as we know the first public evaluation of the model at scale.
We collected 401k human annotations in over the past ~2 days for this, we have uploaded all of the annotation data here on huggingface with a fully permissive license Rapidata/xAI_Aurora_t2i_human_preferences
We uploaded huge human annotated preference dataset for image generation. Instead of just having people choose which model they preferer, we annotated an alignment score on a word by word basis for the prompt. rate the images on coherence, overall alignment and style preference. Those images that score badly were also given to annotators to highlight problem areas. Check it out! Rapidata/text-2-image-Rich-Human-Feedback