1
Demo
👀
Summarize text and files in real-time chat
Adaptive Summarization
community
AI & ML interests
None defined yet.
Recent Activity
adaptsum's activity
chansung
updated
a
Space
1 day ago
Post
2711
Inference-time scaling meets Flux.1-Dev (and others) 🔥
Presenting a simple re-implementation of "Inference-time scaling diffusion models beyond denoising steps" by Ma et al.
I did the simplest random search strategy, but results can potentially be improved with better-guided search methods.
Supports Gemini 2 Flash & Qwen2.5 as verifiers for "LLMGrading" 🤗
The steps are simple:
For each round:
1> Starting by sampling 2 starting noises with different seeds.
2> Score the generations w.r.t a metric.
3> Obtain the best generation from the current round.
If you have more compute budget, go to the next search round. Scale the noise pool (
This constitutes the random search method as done in the paper by Google DeepMind.
Code, more results, and a bunch of other stuff are in the repository. Check it out here: https://github.com/sayakpaul/tt-scale-flux/ 🤗
Presenting a simple re-implementation of "Inference-time scaling diffusion models beyond denoising steps" by Ma et al.
I did the simplest random search strategy, but results can potentially be improved with better-guided search methods.
Supports Gemini 2 Flash & Qwen2.5 as verifiers for "LLMGrading" 🤗
The steps are simple:
For each round:
1> Starting by sampling 2 starting noises with different seeds.
2> Score the generations w.r.t a metric.
3> Obtain the best generation from the current round.
If you have more compute budget, go to the next search round. Scale the noise pool (
2 ** search_round) and repeat 1 - 3.This constitutes the random search method as done in the paper by Google DeepMind.
Code, more results, and a bunch of other stuff are in the repository. Check it out here: https://github.com/sayakpaul/tt-scale-flux/ 🤗
chansung
updated
a
model
5 days ago
chansung
published
a
model
5 days ago
chansung
published
a
Space
19 days ago
Post
2874
Simple Paper Review #5
I briefly reviewed the paper "SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes," which compares SFT and RL in post-training of LLM/VLM from HKU, UC Berkeley, Google DeepMind, and New York University
The conclusion suggests SFT excels in memorization, while RL is better for generalization. However, since LLM/VLM should benefit humans beyond just generalization, a mix of SFT and RL is advisable. Typically, some SFT is followed by RL to understand prompt formats and enhance generalization through trial and error.
The study focused on one model, Llama-3.2-Vision-11B, using environments like General Points for arithmetic reasoning and V-IRL for spatial reasoning. Training data was used for both SFT and RL, with evaluations on in-distribution and out-of-distribution data to assess memorization and generalization.
I want to apply RL extensively, but it requires building a similar simulation environment. For domain-specific models, significant investment in creating a "playground" for the model is crucial, as the effort will directly influence the outcomes.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17161
I briefly reviewed the paper "SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes," which compares SFT and RL in post-training of LLM/VLM from HKU, UC Berkeley, Google DeepMind, and New York University
The conclusion suggests SFT excels in memorization, while RL is better for generalization. However, since LLM/VLM should benefit humans beyond just generalization, a mix of SFT and RL is advisable. Typically, some SFT is followed by RL to understand prompt formats and enhance generalization through trial and error.
The study focused on one model, Llama-3.2-Vision-11B, using environments like General Points for arithmetic reasoning and V-IRL for spatial reasoning. Training data was used for both SFT and RL, with evaluations on in-distribution and out-of-distribution data to assess memorization and generalization.
I want to apply RL extensively, but it requires building a similar simulation environment. For domain-specific models, significant investment in creating a "playground" for the model is crucial, as the effort will directly influence the outcomes.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17161
Post
4279
A brief summary of the o3-mini
The OpenAI o3-mini model is a significant improvement over the o1-mini, reaching o1 performance levels. While generally good, its performance isn't universally better than previous models (o1, o1-prev.) or GPT-4o across all benchmarks. This means workflows should be re-evaluated with each model upgrade.
The o3-mini has "low," "medium," and "high" versions, with "low" being the base model used for benchmarking. It's speculated that the higher versions simply involve more processing. A fair comparison with other models like Gemini 2.0 Thinking or DeepSeek-R1 would likely need to use the "low" version and a similar "think more" mechanism.
The system card is recommended reading due to its comprehensive benchmark data.
https://openai.com/index/openai-o3-mini/
The OpenAI o3-mini model is a significant improvement over the o1-mini, reaching o1 performance levels. While generally good, its performance isn't universally better than previous models (o1, o1-prev.) or GPT-4o across all benchmarks. This means workflows should be re-evaluated with each model upgrade.
The o3-mini has "low," "medium," and "high" versions, with "low" being the base model used for benchmarking. It's speculated that the higher versions simply involve more processing. A fair comparison with other models like Gemini 2.0 Thinking or DeepSeek-R1 would likely need to use the "low" version and a similar "think more" mechanism.
The system card is recommended reading due to its comprehensive benchmark data.
https://openai.com/index/openai-o3-mini/
Post
1962
We have been cooking a couple of fine-tuning runs on CogVideoX with finetrainers, smol datasets, and LoRA to generate cool video effects like crushing, dissolving, etc.
We are also releasing a LoRA extraction utility from a fully fine-tuned checkpoint. I know that kind of stuff has existed since eternity, but the quality on video models was nothing short of spectacular. Below are some links:
* Models and datasets: https://huggingface.co/finetrainers
* finetrainers: https://github.com/a-r-r-o-w/finetrainers
* LoRA extraction: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/scripts/extract_lora_from_model.py
We are also releasing a LoRA extraction utility from a fully fine-tuned checkpoint. I know that kind of stuff has existed since eternity, but the quality on video models was nothing short of spectacular. Below are some links:
* Models and datasets: https://huggingface.co/finetrainers
* finetrainers: https://github.com/a-r-r-o-w/finetrainers
* LoRA extraction: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/scripts/extract_lora_from_model.py
- 1 reply
Post
2009
Simple summary on DeepSeek AI's Janus-Pro: A fresh take on multimodal AI!
It builds on its predecessor, Janus, by tweaking the training methodology rather than the model architecture. The result? Improved performance in understanding and generating multimodal data.
Janus-Pro uses a three-stage training strategy, similar to Janus, but with key modifications:
✦ Stage 1 & 2: Focus on separate training for specific objectives, rather than mixing data.
✦ Stage 3: Fine-tuning with a careful balance of multimodal data.
Benchmarks show Janus-Pro holds its own against specialized models like TokenFlow XL and MetaMorph, and other multimodal models like SD3 Medium and DALL-E 3.
The main limitation? Low image resolution (384x384). However, this seems like a strategic choice to focus on establishing a solid "recipe" for multimodal models. Future work will likely leverage this recipe and increased computing power to achieve higher resolutions.
It builds on its predecessor, Janus, by tweaking the training methodology rather than the model architecture. The result? Improved performance in understanding and generating multimodal data.
Janus-Pro uses a three-stage training strategy, similar to Janus, but with key modifications:
✦ Stage 1 & 2: Focus on separate training for specific objectives, rather than mixing data.
✦ Stage 3: Fine-tuning with a careful balance of multimodal data.
Benchmarks show Janus-Pro holds its own against specialized models like TokenFlow XL and MetaMorph, and other multimodal models like SD3 Medium and DALL-E 3.
The main limitation? Low image resolution (384x384). However, this seems like a strategic choice to focus on establishing a solid "recipe" for multimodal models. Future work will likely leverage this recipe and increased computing power to achieve higher resolutions.
Post
1937
We have authored a post to go over the state of video generation in the Diffusers ecosystem 🧨
We cover the models supported, the knobs of optims our users can fire, fine-tuning, and more 🔥
5-6GBs for HunyuanVideo, sky is the limit 🌌 🤗
https://huggingface.co/blog/video_gen
We cover the models supported, the knobs of optims our users can fire, fine-tuning, and more 🔥
5-6GBs for HunyuanVideo, sky is the limit 🌌 🤗
https://huggingface.co/blog/video_gen
Post
1726
New look for AI powered paper reviews from the list by Hugging Face Daily Papers ( managed by the
@akhaliq
)
Bookmark the webpage along, check comprehensive reviews by Google DeepMind Gemini 1.5, and listen to audio podcast made by the same tech used in NotebookLM.
Link: https://deep-diver.github.io/ai-paper-reviewer/
This is not an official service by Hugging Face. It is just a service developed by an individual developer using his own money :)
Bookmark the webpage along, check comprehensive reviews by Google DeepMind Gemini 1.5, and listen to audio podcast made by the same tech used in NotebookLM.
Link: https://deep-diver.github.io/ai-paper-reviewer/
This is not an official service by Hugging Face. It is just a service developed by an individual developer using his own money :)
Post
2015
Simple summarization of Evolving Deeper LLM Thinking (Google DeepMind)
The process starts by posing a question.
1) The LLM generates initial responses.
2) These generated responses are evaluated according to specific criteria (program-based checker).
3) The LLM critiques the evaluated results.
4) The LLM refines the responses based on the evaluation, critique, and original responses.
The refined response is then fed back into step 2). If it meets the criteria, the process ends. Otherwise, the algorithm generates more responses based on the refined ones (with some being discarded, some remaining, and some responses potentially being merged).
Through this process, it demonstrated excellent performance in complex scheduling problems (travel planning, meeting scheduling, etc.). It's a viable method for finding highly effective solutions in specific scenarios.
However, there are two major drawbacks:
🤔 An excessive number of API calls are required. (While the cost might not be very high, it leads to significant latency.)
🤔 The evaluator is program-based. (This limits its use as a general method. It could potentially be modified/implemented using LLM as Judge, but that would introduce additional API costs for evaluation.)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09891
The process starts by posing a question.
1) The LLM generates initial responses.
2) These generated responses are evaluated according to specific criteria (program-based checker).
3) The LLM critiques the evaluated results.
4) The LLM refines the responses based on the evaluation, critique, and original responses.
The refined response is then fed back into step 2). If it meets the criteria, the process ends. Otherwise, the algorithm generates more responses based on the refined ones (with some being discarded, some remaining, and some responses potentially being merged).
Through this process, it demonstrated excellent performance in complex scheduling problems (travel planning, meeting scheduling, etc.). It's a viable method for finding highly effective solutions in specific scenarios.
However, there are two major drawbacks:
🤔 An excessive number of API calls are required. (While the cost might not be very high, it leads to significant latency.)
🤔 The evaluator is program-based. (This limits its use as a general method. It could potentially be modified/implemented using LLM as Judge, but that would introduce additional API costs for evaluation.)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09891
Post
2037
Simple Summarization on DeepSeek-R1 from DeepSeek AI
The RL stage is very important.
↳ However, it is difficult to create a truly helpful AI for people solely through RL.
↳ So, we applied a learning pipeline consisting of four stages: providing a good starting point, reasoning RL, SFT, and safety RL, and achieved performance comparable to o1.
↳ Simply fine-tuning other open models with the data generated by R1-Zero (distillation) resulted in performance comparable to o1-mini.
Of course, this is just a brief overview and may not be of much help. All models are accessible on Hugging Face, and the paper can be read through the GitHub repository.
Model: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai
Paper: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1
The RL stage is very important.
↳ However, it is difficult to create a truly helpful AI for people solely through RL.
↳ So, we applied a learning pipeline consisting of four stages: providing a good starting point, reasoning RL, SFT, and safety RL, and achieved performance comparable to o1.
↳ Simply fine-tuning other open models with the data generated by R1-Zero (distillation) resulted in performance comparable to o1-mini.
Of course, this is just a brief overview and may not be of much help. All models are accessible on Hugging Face, and the paper can be read through the GitHub repository.
Model: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai
Paper: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1
- 1 reply
Post
4350
Commits speak louder than words 🤪
* 4 new video models
* Multiple image models, including SANA & Flux Control
* New quantizers -> GGUF & TorchAO
* New training scripts
Enjoy this holiday-special Diffusers release 🤗
Notes: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/releases/tag/v0.32.0
* 4 new video models
* Multiple image models, including SANA & Flux Control
* New quantizers -> GGUF & TorchAO
* New training scripts
Enjoy this holiday-special Diffusers release 🤗
Notes: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/releases/tag/v0.32.0
Post
2183
In the past seven days, the Diffusers team has shipped:
1. Two new video models
2. One new image model
3. Two new quantization backends
4. Three new fine-tuning scripts
5. Multiple fixes and library QoL improvements
Coffee on me if someone can guess 1 - 4 correctly.
1. Two new video models
2. One new image model
3. Two new quantization backends
4. Three new fine-tuning scripts
5. Multiple fixes and library QoL improvements
Coffee on me if someone can guess 1 - 4 correctly.
- 1 reply
chansung
authored
a
paper
2 months ago
Post
2129
Introducing a high-quality open-preference dataset to further this line of research for image generation.
Despite being such an inseparable component for modern image generation, open preference datasets are a rarity!
So, we decided to work on one with the community!
Check it out here:
https://huggingface.co/blog/image-preferences
Despite being such an inseparable component for modern image generation, open preference datasets are a rarity!
So, we decided to work on one with the community!
Check it out here:
https://huggingface.co/blog/image-preferences
- 7 replies
Post
2161
The Control family of Flux from
@black-forest-labs
should be discussed more!
It enables structural controls like ControlNets while being significantly less expensive to run!
So, we're working on a Control LoRA training script 🤗
It's still WIP, so go easy:
https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/10130
It enables structural controls like ControlNets while being significantly less expensive to run!
So, we're working on a Control LoRA training script 🤗
It's still WIP, so go easy:
https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/10130
sayakpaul
authored
a
paper
3 months ago
Post
1523
Let 2024 be the year of video model fine-tunes!
Check it out here:
https://github.com/a-r-r-o-w/cogvideox-factory/tree/main/training/mochi-1
Check it out here:
https://github.com/a-r-r-o-w/cogvideox-factory/tree/main/training/mochi-1