Overfitting a bit to sensual/porn pics

#1
by DrAliGomaa - opened

the model is doing great!! excels in detecting sensual pics that other models don't detect as Freepik/nsfw_image_detector, but due to this maybe it needs to be trained more on normal pics ? i tried pics with women standing beside touching each other but wearing hijab , and detected as porno/sensual , this is an example, Overall great model, if corrected this and trained on more women and men wearing causual clothes labelled as normal/neutral would be really the best model there, thanks!!.

Thanks for the comments. @DrAliGomaa
I'm still short on time to curate more standard categories for the set.
I hope to fix that in the next versions!

Please try this model: https://huggingface.co/prithivMLmods/Mature-Content-Detection
If you're experiencing a similar issue with overfitting, kindly let me know.

@prithivMLmods I prefer it to overfit for explicit content than underfit!!, So this model is actually better, THIS model is superb just need more data and it will excel, also make sure to train more on the see through content, also all football shorts on girls considered normal tested on 12 pics , i know they are much less explicit but for some religions any exposure to any body part in women is considered a bad thing. so maybe more labels can help as you suggested. You are doing a favor to humanity, please keep enhancing , more data -> better results and better future for our kids!!.

DrAliGomaa changed discussion status to closed

Another thing to consider beside see through content is nudity/exposure that is not close to the camera, not zoomed in, the seethrough and the far images are tested and needs adjustment, other than this as far as i tested the model is perfect in detecting women body sensual images.

@DrAliGomaa Thanks for all the suggestions. These features and improvements will be implemented in upcoming models, along with dataset enhancements.

Sign up or log in to comment