This model is violating llama3 license

#3
by galatolo - opened

I would like to bring to attention an issue regarding the naming convention of the LLaMAntino-3-ANITA-8B-Inst-DPO-ITA model, which appears to be a derivative of the Llama-3-8B-Instruct.

According to the Meta Llama 3 Community License Agreement, specifically under section 1.b.i, it is required that any derivative model include "Llama 3" at the beginning of its name if the model is distributed or made available. This stipulation helps in clearly indicating the model's lineage and ensures compliance with the licensing terms provided by Meta.

META LLAMA 3 COMMUNITY LICENSE AGREEMENT
Meta Llama 3 Version Release Date: April 18, 2024
....
....
b. Redistribution and Use.

      i. If you distribute or make available the Llama Materials (or any derivative works
thereof), or a product or service that uses any of them, including another AI model, you shall (A) provide
a copy of this Agreement with any such Llama Materials; and (B) prominently display “Built with Meta
Llama 3” on a related website, user interface, blogpost, about page, or product documentation. If you
use the Llama Materials to create, train, fine tune, or otherwise improve an AI model, which is
distributed or made available, you shall also include “Llama 3” at the beginning of any such AI model
name.
...
...

I suggest renaming the model appropriately to reflect its derivation from the Meta Llama 3 model to avoid future potential problems with Meta

SWAP Research Group@UNIBA org

Thank you for your recommendation. We will consider your suggestion.

Sign up or log in to comment