source_identifier
stringlengths 40
303
⌀ | input
stringlengths 0
32.9k
| output
stringlengths 0
32.9k
|
---|---|---|
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2318636.json | the city of New York convicting the defendant of a violation of the Sanitary Code of the city of New York and granted a new trial.
*John J.*Delany, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*of counsel), for appellant.
*James E. Smith*for respondent.
Order affirmed ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gras:, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, | the city of New York convicting the defendant of a violation of the Sanitary Code of the city of New York and granted a new trial.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*John J.*Delany, *Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly*of counsel), for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*James E. Smith*for respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Order affirmed ; no opinion.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gras:, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8375042.json | D07-3341.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 5, 2007.
Edd Cox, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.
Gypsy Bailey, Staff Counsel/Director of Courts, Tallahassee; Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Alexandria Walters, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for | D07-3341.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.<|paragraph|>
Dec. 5, 2007.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Edd Cox, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Gypsy Bailey, Staff Counsel/Director of Courts, Tallahassee; Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Alexandria Walters, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
The petition for |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/na1160_smo_2a.htm.json | -5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's | | | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4
|1990's | 7 | -5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
|1980's | | | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 <|sentence|><|paragraph|>
|1990's | 7 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7419749.json | a sentence imposed under the guidelines on the ground that the sentence was excessive based on the points scored. He correctly urges that when a trial court erroneously departs from the guidelines in an attempt to impose a youthful offender sentence, the sentence must be reversed. Furthermore, when, as in this case, a trial court is not aware that a departure sentence is being imposed, on remand the court shall have a fresh opportunity to reimpose a departure sentence. *Hernandez v. State,*672 So.2d 66 (Fla. | a sentence imposed under the guidelines on the ground that the sentence was excessive based on the points scored.<|sentence|> He correctly urges that when a trial court erroneously departs from the guidelines in an attempt to impose a youthful offender sentence, the sentence must be reversed.<|sentence|> Furthermore, when, as in this case, a trial court is not aware that a departure sentence is being imposed, on remand the court shall have a fresh opportunity to reimpose a departure sentence.<|sentence|> *Hernandez v. State,*672 So.2d 66 (Fla. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/hcensu.pdf.json | left open during operation.
The road saws had 26” toothed circular blades that were used to cut a concrete road into
approximately 6’ by 6’ slabs, | left open during operation.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The road saws had 26” toothed circular blades that were used to cut a concrete road into<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
approximately 6’ by 6’ slabs, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2077752.json | R. Price, App’lt, *v.*Thomas A. Mapes, Assignee, Resp’t.
*Edward O. Perkins,*for app’lt; *George M. Bush,*for resp’t.
Judgment affirmed, without costs. All concur.
Affirming 28 St. Rep., 88 | R. Price, App’lt, *v.*Thomas A. Mapes, Assignee, Resp’t.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Edward O. Perkins,*for app’lt; *George M. Bush,*for resp’t.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Judgment affirmed, without costs.<|sentence|> All concur.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Affirming 28 St. Rep., 88 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=disease:3772&f[1]=topic:4429&f[2]=topic:4617&f[3]=topic:13353&f[4]=type:publications.json | Drugs
(23)Antiviral Drugs
(1)Asians/Pacific Islanders
(3)At Risk Persons
(29)Attitudes
(4)Behavioral Research
(4)Bisexuals
(1)Blood Transfusions
(1)Cancer
(1)Caregivers | Drugs<|paragraph|>
(23)Antiviral Drugs<|paragraph|>
(1)Asians/Pacific Islanders<|paragraph|>
(3)At Risk Persons<|paragraph|>
(29)Attitudes<|paragraph|>
(4)Behavioral Research<|paragraph|>
(4)Bisexuals<|paragraph|>
(1)Blood Transfusions<|paragraph|>
(1)Cancer<|paragraph|>
(1)Caregivers |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ars.usda.gov/arsuserfiles/20361500/pdf_pubs/P1363.pdf.json | . van Genuchten*
US Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
Received 6 February 1995; revision accepted 18 May 1995
Abstract
Solutions of the Richards equation for water | . van Genuchten*<|sentence|>
US Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, CA 92507, USA<|paragraph|>
Received 6 February 1995; revision accepted 18 May 1995<|paragraph|>
Abstract<|paragraph|>
Solutions of the Richards equation for water |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12692002.json | . STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D18-1901
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[April 18, 2019]
**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**
Affirmed. | . STATE of Florida, Appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 4D18-1901<|paragraph|>
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
[April 18, 2019]<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**<|paragraph|>
Affirmed. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/gis/atmapbc.pdf.json | ÀÀÀ@@
@À@@ÀÀ
@@ÀÀ@@@@ÀÀÀÀ@À@À@À@À@@ÀÀ@@ÀÀ@@@@ÀÀÀÀ@@ÀÀ
@@ÀÀ@@ | ÀÀÀ@@<|paragraph|>
@À@@ÀÀ<|paragraph|>
@@ÀÀ@@@@ÀÀÀÀ@À@À@À@À@@ÀÀ@@ÀÀ@@@@ÀÀÀÀ@@ÀÀ<|paragraph|>
@@ÀÀ@@ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6123370.json | , 1984, and are to be applied to cases pending as of that date. *Id.*§ 553(b), 98 Stat. 333, 392. Accordingly, we cite to new section 158(d) here. However, | , 1984, and are to be applied to cases pending as of that date.<|sentence|> *Id.*§ 553(b), 98 Stat. 333, 392.<|sentence|> Accordingly, we cite to new section 158(d) here.<|sentence|> However, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1626703.json | A. Yes,*sir; I did.
> “ *‘Q.*And before you closed the trade with Mr. Cutter did you ask Mr. Dunn if he would allow you to use his license here in this city?
> *“ ‘A.*Yes, sir.
> “ *‘Q.*If you traded, and Mr. Dunn told you he would?
> “ *‘A.*Yes, | A. Yes,*sir; I did.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> “ *‘Q.*And before you closed the trade with Mr. Cutter did you ask Mr. Dunn if he would allow you to use his license here in this city?<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> *“ ‘A.*Yes, sir.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> “ *‘Q.*If you traded, and Mr. Dunn told you he would?<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> “ *‘A.*Yes, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3878359.json | paragraph 452, and accordingly sustained the protests. The Government appeals.
An analysis of paragraph 452 discloses that the application of the last provision thereof is made to depend not upon the character of the bag, box, or case, or the method of its construction, but upon the character of its contents. The fact that the Congress has therein enumerated the character of the sets covered thereby as "traveling, bottle, drinking | paragraph 452, and accordingly sustained the protests.<|sentence|> The Government appeals.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
An analysis of paragraph 452 discloses that the application of the last provision thereof is made to depend not upon the character of the bag, box, or case, or the method of its construction, but upon the character of its contents.<|sentence|> The fact that the Congress has therein enumerated the character of the sets covered thereby as "traveling, bottle, drinking |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4069334.json | outrageous hours, in determining whether or not the workplace was safe. Surely, an employer is no less negligent in doing either.
Most respectfully, my hope is that the Supreme Court will revisit this area of the law. As Justice Ginsburg stated in her dissent in *Gottshall:*“Instead of the restrictive ‘zone’ | outrageous hours, in determining whether or not the workplace was safe.<|sentence|> Surely, an employer is no less negligent in doing either.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Most respectfully, my hope is that the Supreme Court will revisit this area of the law.<|sentence|> As Justice Ginsburg stated in her dissent in *Gottshall:*“Instead of the restrictive ‘zone’ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8855379.json | sum of $3,900.00, part payment, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the seller.
> “Number Branded
> 100 4 Left hip
> Description Price
> Yearling steers | sum of $3,900.00, part payment, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the seller.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> “Number Branded<|paragraph|>
> 100 4 Left hip<|paragraph|>
> Description Price<|paragraph|>
> Yearling steers |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2357983.json | first be settled in its favor before it can insist that measures shall be taken to provide means for its payment.
The application made in this case was for a peremptory writ of mandamus, directing the bonds to be issued for the purpose of raising those means; but as no debt appeared to exist, to be paid by them, the application could not properly be allowed to succeed. To warrant its success the debt should have previously been established. That could not be | first be settled in its favor before it can insist that measures shall be taken to provide means for its payment.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The application made in this case was for a peremptory writ of mandamus, directing the bonds to be issued for the purpose of raising those means;<|sentence|> but as no debt appeared to exist, to be paid by them, the application could not properly be allowed to succeed.<|sentence|> To warrant its success the debt should have previously been established.<|sentence|> That could not be |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1787610.json | No. 79-1356.
#### Johnson et al. *v.*Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted | No. 79-1356.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### Johnson et al. *v.*Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al.<|paragraph|>
C. A. 7th Cir.<|sentence|> Certiorari granted |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2719293.json | and facts and the defendant’s application for an examination before trial of the plaintiffs Harry B. Hicks and Mary B. Hicks granted to this extent: The defendant may examine the said | and facts and the defendant’s application for an examination before trial of the plaintiffs Harry B. Hicks and Mary B. Hicks granted to this extent:<|sentence|> The defendant may examine the said |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/604641.json | file was sent by Meyer Suozzi to Albin & Richman on September 23, 1999. Meyer Suozzi’s letter stated in part:
> “Thank you for acknowledging this firm’s lien in this matter. We certainly hope that the matter of this firm’s legal fees can be amicably resolved. We advise you once again that | file was sent by Meyer Suozzi to Albin & Richman on September 23, 1999.<|sentence|> Meyer Suozzi’s letter stated in part:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> “Thank you for acknowledging this firm’s lien in this matter.<|sentence|> We certainly hope that the matter of this firm’s legal fees can be amicably resolved.<|sentence|> We advise you once again that |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10597911.json | policy, we have held them valid in other contexts and are persuaded that the public policy favoring such exclusions is equally applicable here. *See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Williams,*355 N.W.2d 421 (Minn.1984); *Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Hill,*314 N.W.2d 834 (Minn.1982); and *Smith v. Senst,*313 N.W.2d 202 (Minn.1981 | policy, we have held them valid in other contexts and are persuaded that the public policy favoring such exclusions is equally applicable here.<|sentence|> *See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Williams,*355 N.W.2d 421 (Minn.1984); *Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Hill,*314 N.W.2d 834 (Minn.1982); and *Smith v. Senst,*313 N.W.2d 202 (Minn.1981 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6728348.json | in both devices, when the treadle is depressed, the machine is automatically stopped upon each half revolution of the crank shaft. It is this automatic stop movement when the lever is depressed which is the essential characteristic of the Cutcheon device, and which is also found in the defendants’ machine. The use of two treadles by the defendants, instead of one, I regard as immaterial. It appears that the machine will operate equally well with one | in both devices, when the treadle is depressed, the machine is automatically stopped upon each half revolution of the crank shaft.<|sentence|> It is this automatic stop movement when the lever is depressed which is the essential characteristic of the Cutcheon device, and which is also found in the defendants’ machine.<|sentence|> The use of two treadles by the defendants, instead of one, I regard as immaterial.<|sentence|> It appears that the machine will operate equally well with one |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5161104.json | Hayward, Appellant, v. Altman Foundation, a Domestic Corporation, Respondent.
Order dismissing the complaint on motion of the defendant on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and directing judgment in favor of the defendant affirmed, without costs. No opinion | Hayward, Appellant, v. Altman Foundation, a Domestic Corporation, Respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Order dismissing the complaint on motion of the defendant on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and directing judgment in favor of the defendant affirmed, without costs.<|sentence|> No opinion |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ams.usda.gov/node/41655.json | & Analysis
Organic Certification & Accreditation
Packers & Stockyards
Plant Variety Protection
Pesticide Data Program
Regional Food Business Centers
Seed Regulations and Testing
Transportation Research & Analysis
Warehouse Services
Resources
Resources
Data
Forms
Interactive Resources
Publications
Reports & Presentations
Commodity Procurement
Commodity Procurement
Selling Food to USDA
International Commodity Requirements | & Analysis<|paragraph|>
Organic Certification & Accreditation<|paragraph|>
Packers & Stockyards<|paragraph|>
Plant Variety Protection<|paragraph|>
Pesticide Data Program<|paragraph|>
Regional Food Business Centers<|paragraph|>
Seed Regulations and Testing<|paragraph|>
Transportation Research & Analysis<|paragraph|>
Warehouse Services<|paragraph|>
Resources<|paragraph|>
Resources<|paragraph|>
Data<|paragraph|>
Forms<|paragraph|>
Interactive Resources<|paragraph|>
Publications<|paragraph|>
Reports & Presentations<|paragraph|>
Commodity Procurement<|paragraph|>
Commodity Procurement<|paragraph|>
Selling Food to USDA<|paragraph|>
International Commodity Requirements |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1688973.json | .
> *“Mr. Dixon:*And that she fully understood the dangers of this railroad crossing?
> *“Mr. Look:*Yes, that is already shown, and we will admit it. We don’t admit that she knew the danger on that day, we don’t admit that, nor the circumstances that led up to “her death on the 4th day of May, 1914.”
It | .
> *“Mr. Dixon:*And that she fully understood the dangers of this railroad crossing?<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> *“Mr. Look:*Yes, that is already shown, and we will admit it.<|sentence|> We don’t admit that she knew the danger on that day, we don’t admit that, nor the circumstances that led up to “her death on the 4th day of May, 1914.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
It |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10277511.json | of said suit. Said plea was excepted to because it was not “in proper legal form; that it is vague, indefinite and uncertain, and does not set forth with the particularity prescribed by statute, the time, manner, and' form of payment, nor inform the plaintiff the facts sought to be proven. * * * ” The | of said suit.<|sentence|> Said plea was excepted to because it was not “in proper legal form; that it is vague, indefinite and uncertain, and does not set forth with the particularity prescribed by statute, the time, manner, and' form of payment, nor inform the plaintiff the facts sought to be proven.<|sentence|> * * * ”<|sentence|> The |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9201648.json | plaintiff cannot demonstrate that she ultimately suffered any damages. The USPS placed plaintiff in an Air Records Processor position during the pay period after it discovered that she qualified for the position, and later paid her $3,576.77 for the lost pay period when she should have been | plaintiff cannot demonstrate that she ultimately suffered any damages.<|sentence|> The USPS placed plaintiff in an Air Records Processor position during the pay period after it discovered that she qualified for the position, and later paid her $3,576.77 for the lost pay period when she should have been |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/index.html?f[0]=date:2015&f[1]=state:11.json | resources are used by organizations nationwide to improve the quality, safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of health care. The Agency’s Impact Case Studies highlight these successes, describing the use and impact of AHRQ-funded tools by State and Federal policy makers, health systems, clinicians, academicians, and other professionals.
Tell us how you're using our | resources are used by organizations nationwide to improve the quality, safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of health care.<|sentence|> The Agency’s Impact Case Studies highlight these successes, describing the use and impact of AHRQ-funded tools by State and Federal policy makers, health systems, clinicians, academicians, and other professionals.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Tell us how you're using our |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6039693.json | the Municipal Court was without jurisdiction to render any judgment. Appellants reply that Seaman’s answer sought affirmative relief and that therefore the exception stated in the above section prevented respondents from dismissing the action. However, it will be | the Municipal Court was without jurisdiction to render any judgment.<|sentence|> Appellants reply that Seaman’s answer sought affirmative relief and that therefore the exception stated in the above section prevented respondents from dismissing the action.<|sentence|> However, it will be |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8668491.json | relating to same.”
The trial court scheduled the case for pretrial on October 10, 1985, for jury selection on November 13, 1985 and for jury trial on December 5, 1985. Our review of the record reveals no reference by Flessas to the discovery motion at either the | relating to same.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The trial court scheduled the case for pretrial on October 10, 1985, for jury selection on November 13, 1985 and for jury trial on December 5, 1985.<|sentence|> Our review of the record reveals no reference by Flessas to the discovery motion at either the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1371939.json | the potential prejudice that can result from the fact that the evidence adduced (or excluded) at one phase of a capital-murder prosecution will overlap another phase of the prosecution. *State v. Erazo,*126 *N.J.*112, 133, 594 A.2d 232 (1991) (noting that evidence introduced at guilt phase of capital trial has an inescapable impact on jury’s deliberation in penalty phase). In most cases, the | the potential prejudice that can result from the fact that the evidence adduced (or excluded) at one phase of a capital-murder prosecution will overlap another phase of the prosecution.<|sentence|> *State v. Erazo,*126 *N.J.*112, 133, 594 A.2d 232 (1991) (noting that evidence introduced at guilt phase of capital trial has an inescapable impact on jury’s deliberation in penalty phase).<|sentence|> In most cases, the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.acquisition.gov/node/36383/printable/print.json | DoD elects to conduct a damage assessment, the Contracting Officer will request that the Contractor provide all of the damage assessment information gathered in accordance with paragraph (e) of this clause. (h) *DoD safeguarding and use of contractor attributional/proprietary information.* The Government shall protect against the unauthorized use or release of information obtained from the contractor (or derived from information obtained from the contractor) under this clause that includes | DoD elects to conduct a damage assessment, the Contracting Officer will request that the Contractor provide all of the damage assessment information gathered in accordance with paragraph (e) of this clause.<|sentence|> (h) *DoD safeguarding and use of contractor attributional/proprietary information.* The Government shall protect against the unauthorized use or release of information obtained from the contractor (or derived from information obtained from the contractor) under this clause that includes |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8621217.json | land, and hence the principle announced in that case does not control the present appeal.
The plaintiffs insist that the defendants other than the First National Bank of Monroe were interveners, but the record | land, and hence the principle announced in that case does not control the present appeal.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The plaintiffs insist that the defendants other than the First National Bank of Monroe were interveners, but the record |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2155910.json | Gibbs in pursuance of the written agreement referred to, procured or *528brought about a sale to George W. Seevers for a sum largely in excess of the net price reserved by said corporation, but that defendants neglect and refuse to pay the | Gibbs in pursuance of the written agreement referred to, procured or *528brought about a sale to George W. Seevers for a sum largely in excess of the net price reserved by said corporation, but that defendants neglect and refuse to pay the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12646919.json | Sadler, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff Chip Hall & Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Defendants.
No. COA16-547
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Filed: | Sadler, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff Chip Hall & Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Defendants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. COA16-547<|paragraph|>
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Filed: |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11924339.json | Court DECLARES that the option agreement recorded in the Essex South District Registry of Deeds Book 6351, Page 401, is in full force and effect. The Court ORDERS that upon payment of the option sum of $1.00 by the plaintiff, the defendant shall convey the land affected by said agreement.
1
See *Thomas v. Kiendzior,*27 Mass.App.Ct. | Court DECLARES that the option agreement recorded in the Essex South District Registry of Deeds Book 6351, Page 401, is in full force and effect.<|sentence|> The Court ORDERS that upon payment of the option sum of $1.00 by the plaintiff, the defendant shall convey the land affected by said agreement.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
1<|paragraph|>
See *Thomas v. Kiendzior,*27 Mass.App.Ct. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5296442.json | to be given by the defendants, Hickman Short and Ann Short, within 3 days after the value of the listed assets was computed and the approval of the agreement was given by the supplying companies. It does not appear to be contended that the sum of $15,000 was paid and the note executed and delivered, other than | to be given by the defendants, Hickman Short and Ann Short, within 3 days after the value of the listed assets was computed and the approval of the agreement was given by the supplying companies.<|sentence|> It does not appear to be contended that the sum of $15,000 was paid and the note executed and delivered, other than |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1921725.json | tbe defendant ” did not depend *“*upon the nature of tbe action, ” but upon facts wbicb could have been shown by affidavit, and were not necessary to be stated in tbe complaint; and also because such facts as averred establish no cause of action in trover, it follows, that tbe execution against ,tbe ■ person of tbe | tbe defendant ” did not depend *“*upon the nature of tbe action, ” but upon facts wbicb could have been shown by affidavit, and were not necessary to be stated in tbe complaint;<|sentence|> and also because such facts as averred establish no cause of action in trover, it follows, that tbe execution against ,tbe ■ person of tbe |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.federalreserve.gov/releases/G17/20050715/table4.htm.json | 74 | 48.2 | 48.7 | 48.1
|2.97 | 95.8 | 95.2 | 95.5
|2.17 | 87.8 | 88.0 | 87.8
|1.98 | 110.1 | 112.0 | 74 | 48.2 | 48.7 | 48.1 <|sentence|>
|2.97 | 95.8 | 95.2 | 95.5 <|sentence|>
|2.17 | 87.8 | 88.0 | 87.8 <|sentence|>
|1.98 | 110.1 | 112.0 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/power-uprates.html.json | Transfers & Mergers
- Power Uprates
- Reactor License Renewal
- Resource Estimator for Operating Reactor Licensing
#### Spotlight
#### Choose a Section
- The Commission
- License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
- Job Openings
- Palisades Restart | Transfers & Mergers<|paragraph|>
- Power Uprates<|paragraph|>
- Reactor License Renewal<|paragraph|>
- Resource Estimator for Operating Reactor Licensing<|paragraph|>
#### Spotlight<|paragraph|>
#### Choose a Section<|paragraph|>
- The Commission<|paragraph|>
- License Renewal Generic Environmental Review<|paragraph|>
- Job Openings<|paragraph|>
- Palisades Restart |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4387044.json | to such a fact is not proving the provisions of the will by such a witness, as is required by this statute. A witness who testifies only to what he learns from statements made by the testator is really giving only hearsay testimony. He could not be said to be testifying to the provisions of the will, but only to what another had stated its provisions to be. We think the two witnesses required by the statute must each be able to | to such a fact is not proving the provisions of the will by such a witness, as is required by this statute.<|sentence|> A witness who testifies only to what he learns from statements made by the testator is really giving only hearsay testimony.<|sentence|> He could not be said to be testifying to the provisions of the will, but only to what another had stated its provisions to be.<|sentence|> We think the two witnesses required by the statute must each be able to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5471099.json | Attorney-General (Jorge L. Gomez*and *Daniel Polansky*of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
Herlihy, J.
The deceased employee sustained a | Attorney-General (Jorge L. Gomez*and *Daniel Polansky*of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Herlihy, J.<|paragraph|>
The deceased employee sustained a |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10538256.json | appeared before the D.C. district court and, rather than present arguments for and against the implementation of a TRO, the parties represented to the court that Coca-Cola would not consummate the acquisition until the | appeared before the D.C. district court and, rather than present arguments for and against the implementation of a TRO, the parties represented to the court that Coca-Cola would not consummate the acquisition until the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1344716.json | , 790, and *Stewart*v. *State,*39 Ohio St., 152.
It is concluded in *Chinn*v. *State,*47 Ohio St., 575, 26 N. E., 986, 11 L. R. A., 630, that:
“Affinity is the relationship which arises from marriage between one of the spouses and the blood-relations of the other, * * *"
Surely this definition comprehends relationship between a wife’s | , 790, and *Stewart*v. *State,*39 Ohio St., 152.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
It is concluded in *Chinn*v. *State,*47 Ohio St., 575, 26 N. E., 986, 11 L. R. A., 630, that:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
“Affinity is the relationship which arises from marriage between one of the spouses and the blood-relations of the other, * * *"<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Surely this definition comprehends relationship between a wife’s |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cdc.gov/flu/pdf/professionals/nhis89_08ppvvaxtrendtab.pdf.json | 10.5±1.7
(2099)
12.3±1.6
(2282)
10.3±1.2
(2649)
10.7±1.6
(2095)
12.6±1.8
(1966)
12.6±1.5
(2216)
1
Not High Risk N/A N/A N/A N/ | 10.5±1.7<|sentence|>
(2099)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
12.3±1.6<|sentence|>
(2282)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
10.3±1.2<|sentence|>
(2649)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
10.7±1.6<|sentence|>
(2095)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
12.6±1.8<|sentence|>
(1966)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
12.6±1.5<|sentence|>
(2216)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
1<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Not High Risk N/A N/A N/A N/ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/528020.json | have been any service of this order of revival upon the defendant or her attorney, and the plaintiff’s counsel on the next day obtained from the Court a judgment by default against her, which was made final a few days thereafter, without any appearance or defence on behalf of the defendant.
On the same day, however, on which the judgment was made final against her, the defendant came into Court with her counsel and moved for a new trial, upon the ground that both the judgment by default and final judgment against her were irregular and illegal. The District Judge overruled this motion, and the defendant has appealed. | have been any service of this order of revival upon the defendant or her attorney, and the plaintiff’s counsel on the next day obtained from the Court a judgment by default against her, which was made final a few days thereafter, without any appearance or defence on behalf of the defendant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
On the same day, however, on which the judgment was made final against her, the defendant came into Court with her counsel and moved for a new trial, upon the ground that both the judgment by default and final judgment against her were irregular and illegal.<|sentence|> The District Judge overruled this motion, and the defendant has appealed. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ssa.gov/foia/SSA FY 15 Final.docx.json | , and telephone numbers of all individual agency components that receive FOIA requests.
**Office of Privacy and Disclosure, Altmeyer Building, Room 617, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-0001, (410) 966-6645.**
** | , and telephone numbers of all individual agency components that receive FOIA requests.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
**Office of Privacy and Disclosure, Altmeyer Building, Room 617, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-0001, (410) 966-6645.**<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
** |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2689112.json | Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.
PER CURIAM. | Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/595368.json | . Following discovery, defendants filed their motion for summary judgment, contending that the claim was barred by the verbal threshold provisions of the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), *N.J.S.A*39:6A-8a. That motion was returnable on December 20, 2002 and plaintiffs requested oral argument. The motion judge granted the motion by order entered on December 20, 2002, without entertaining | . Following discovery, defendants filed their motion for summary judgment, contending that the claim was barred by the verbal threshold provisions of the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), *N.J.S.A*39:6A-8a.<|sentence|> That motion was returnable on December 20, 2002 and plaintiffs requested oral argument.<|sentence|> The motion judge granted the motion by order entered on December 20, 2002, without entertaining |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3490673.json | , in Sunflower County, in the State of Mississippi; that in February, 1864, said cotton was seized by the military forces of the United States and turned over to the quartermaster at Vicksburg, Miss., where was stored also cotton seized in like manner from other parties by the military authorities; that upon application to a military board there convened, the board recommended “ that said 170 bales of cotton be turned over to | , in Sunflower County, in the State of Mississippi;<|sentence|> that in February, 1864, said cotton was seized by the military forces of the United States and turned over to the quartermaster at Vicksburg, Miss., where was stored also cotton seized in like manner from other parties by the military authorities;<|sentence|> that upon application to a military board there convened, the board recommended “ that said 170 bales of cotton be turned over to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4629911.json | We described category IV land as, “the areas where the electric lines of more than one competing utility are intermingled. In parts of these areas competing lines cross one another, run closely parallel | We described category IV land as, “the areas where the electric lines of more than one competing utility are intermingled.<|sentence|> In parts of these areas competing lines cross one another, run closely parallel |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/232472.json | granted. Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 16, 1993. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 14, 1993. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, January 5 | granted.<|sentence|> Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 16, 1993.<|sentence|> Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 14, 1993.<|sentence|> A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, January 5 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.centcom.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=6&ModuleId=1231&Article=903919.json | Fla (October 24, 2011) — A detainee at the Detention Facility in Parwan died yesterday from an inoperable and terminal brain tumor. At the time of his death, the detainee was receiving medical care at Craig Combat Surgical Hospital, a nearby U.S. medical facility.
As a compassionate and humanitarian gesture, Combined Joint Interagency Task Force 435 worked with Afghan authorities and the International Committee of the Red Cross to contact family members and arrange visitations with the detainee while he was receiving medical care. The family members expressed appreciation for these visits and the quality of care provided to the detainee.
The detainee’s remains are being | Fla (October 24, 2011) — A detainee at the Detention Facility in Parwan died yesterday from an inoperable and terminal brain tumor.<|sentence|> At the time of his death, the detainee was receiving medical care at Craig Combat Surgical Hospital, a nearby U.S. medical facility.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
As a compassionate and humanitarian gesture, Combined Joint Interagency Task Force 435 worked with Afghan authorities and the International Committee of the Red Cross to contact family members and arrange visitations with the detainee while he was receiving medical care.<|sentence|> The family members expressed appreciation for these visits and the quality of care provided to the detainee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The detainee’s remains are being |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/681716.json | William B. and Another, Infants. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Diana B., Appellant.
[729 NYS2d 923]
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Contrary to respondent’s contention, Family Court’s finding | William B. and Another, Infants.<|sentence|> Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent;<|sentence|> Diana B., Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
[729 NYS2d 923]<|paragraph|>
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs.<|sentence|> Memorandum: Contrary to respondent’s contention, Family Court’s finding |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5346090.json | , Inc., et al., Defendants, and NEA Service, Inc., Appellant.
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant-appellant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment | , Inc., et al., Defendants, and NEA Service, Inc., Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant-appellant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.acquisition.gov/search/advanced?keys=&sort_by=search_api_relevance&sort_order=DESC&type[far_dita]=far_dita&f[0]=part_number:37&f[1]=part_number:41&f[2]=part_number:52.json | 211-9 Desired and Required Time of Delivery., As prescribed in 11.404 (a)(3) , insert the following clause: Desired and Required Time of Delivery (June 1997) (a) The Government desires delivery to be made according to the following...FAR
52.211-9_Alternate II52.211-9 | 211-9 Desired and Required Time of Delivery., As prescribed in 11.404 (a)(3) , insert the following clause:<|sentence|> Desired and Required Time of Delivery (June 1997)<|sentence|> (a) The Government desires delivery to be made according to the following...FAR<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
52.211-9_Alternate II52.211-9 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6089220.json | , the entries did not represent actual assets belonging to the taxpayer. They represented nothing, in fact, and were properly excluded by the Commissioner from the taxpayer’s capital.
With reference to the items of alleged expense for the year 1919 which the Commissioner has disallowed, the taxpayer has introduced no evidence to support its claim that they were proper deductions *1076from income | , the entries did not represent actual assets belonging to the taxpayer.<|sentence|> They represented nothing, in fact, and were properly excluded by the Commissioner from the taxpayer’s capital.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
With reference to the items of alleged expense for the year 1919 which the Commissioner has disallowed, the taxpayer has introduced no evidence to support its claim that they were proper deductions *1076from income |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/809536.json | SE2d 722); *Simmons v. State,*233 Ga. 429, 432 (211 SE2d 725); *Johnston v. State,*227 Ga. 387 (1) (181 SE2d 42). This being so, the court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized in connection with the warrant.
There is no validity to defendant’ | SE2d 722); *Simmons v. State,*233 Ga. 429, 432 (211 SE2d 725); *Johnston v. State,*227 Ga. 387 (1) (181 SE2d 42).<|sentence|> This being so, the court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized in connection with the warrant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
There is no validity to defendant’ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6649453.json | two [2] years from the date of the injury, whichever is the greater.
The word injury, as used in this statute, has been interpreted to mean the state of facts which first entitled the claimant to compensation, so that even if the injury does not develop until sometime after the accident, the cause of action | two [2] years from the date of the injury, whichever is the greater.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The word injury, as used in this statute, has been interpreted to mean the state of facts which first entitled the claimant to compensation, so that even if the injury does not develop until sometime after the accident, the cause of action |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1653131.json | after Knight went to Panama on a contracting job. It was decided that the couple would be married as soon as they could obtain divorces. According to Mrs. Knight, Knight suggested in a letter that she go to West Memphis, Arkansas, and consult an attorney of Knight’s selection for the procurement of a divorce from Kimball. We think it beyond question that Mrs. Kimball came to Arkansas in December of 1941. She fixes the date as about the middle of the month. She testified that she remained in West Memphis until three or four days before Christmas, when she went to Houston, Texas, to meet Knight, | after Knight went to Panama on a contracting job.<|sentence|> It was decided that the couple would be married as soon as they could obtain divorces.<|sentence|> According to Mrs. Knight, Knight suggested in a letter that she go to West Memphis, Arkansas, and consult an attorney of Knight’s selection for the procurement of a divorce from Kimball.<|sentence|> We think it beyond question that Mrs. Kimball came to Arkansas in December of 1941.<|sentence|> She fixes the date as about the middle of the month.<|sentence|> She testified that she remained in West Memphis until three or four days before Christmas, when she went to Houston, Texas, to meet Knight, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3201797.json | has been satisfied.
CPLR 5021 (subd. [a], par. 3) directs the Clerk of the Court in which the judgment was entered to make an entry of the satisfaction of the judgment on the judgment docket upon *256“ | has been satisfied.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
CPLR 5021 (subd. [a], par. 3) directs the Clerk of the Court in which the judgment was entered to make an entry of the satisfaction of the judgment on the judgment docket upon *256“ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.dla.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=104&ModuleId=47704&Article=2509264.json | property
By Jake Joy
Christian Military Academy, in Vega Baja, became the first Puerto Rican school to screen, select and receive donation property from Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services sites in the continental U.S. in 2020. The K-12 prep school is located on the northern coast of the island, just west of San Juan. The school and entire region | property<|paragraph|>
By Jake Joy<|paragraph|>
Christian Military Academy, in Vega Baja, became the first Puerto Rican school to screen, select and receive donation property from Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services sites in the continental U.S. in 2020.<|sentence|> The K-12 prep school is located on the northern coast of the island, just west of San Juan.<|sentence|> The school and entire region |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/826425.json | *qumre.*
One redeeming land from a tax sale under R. L. c. 13, § 68, who pays interest at the rate of ten per cent on the amount | *qumre.*<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
One redeeming land from a tax sale under R. L. c. 13, § 68, who pays interest at the rate of ten per cent on the amount |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.af.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=1&ModuleId=850&Article=467792.json | making the Netherlands the second partner country to operate the fifth-generation multirole fighter.
Maj. Laurens J.W. Vijge, the Royal Netherlands Air Force F-35 Integrated Training Center training lead, completed his first flight | making the Netherlands the second partner country to operate the fifth-generation multirole fighter.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Maj. Laurens J.W. Vijge, the Royal Netherlands Air Force F-35 Integrated Training Center training lead, completed his first flight |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/336249.json | . National Westminster Bank New Jersey,*98 F.3d 61, 68 & n. 7 (3d Cir.1996) (collecting eases). Within the *McDonnell Douglas*framework, it falls to the plaintiff to first establish a prima facie case of discrimination. If she succeeds in doing so, the defendant must then articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for discharging her. At that juncture, the plaintiff | . National Westminster Bank New Jersey,*98 F.3d 61, 68 & n. 7 (3d Cir.1996) (collecting eases).<|sentence|> Within the *McDonnell Douglas*framework, it falls to the plaintiff to first establish a prima facie case of discrimination.<|sentence|> If she succeeds in doing so, the defendant must then articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for discharging her.<|sentence|> At that juncture, the plaintiff |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/302804.json | signature and “made no claim that any criminal act was involved.” [547-548]
One who enters a house by invitation of its owner and not under any authority or license given by law does not become a trespasser ab initia by his conduct thereafter. [548-549]
At the trial of an action against a savings bank for malicious prosecution of forgery and larceny charges against the plaintiff arising out of an | signature and “made no claim that any criminal act was involved.”<|sentence|> [547-548]<|paragraph|>
One who enters a house by invitation of its owner and not under any authority or license given by law does not become a trespasser ab initia by his conduct thereafter.<|sentence|> [548-549]<|paragraph|>
At the trial of an action against a savings bank for malicious prosecution of forgery and larceny charges against the plaintiff arising out of an |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3694541.json | Plaintiff was then approached by an officer of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, who had been called *57by Georgetown University to escort Plaintiff off of the campus. *Id.*
The following day, Plaintiff “blacked out” and was brought | Plaintiff was then approached by an officer of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, who had been called *57by Georgetown University to escort Plaintiff off of the campus.<|sentence|> *Id.*<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The following day, Plaintiff “blacked out” and was brought |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1353099.json | in the record, and the circuit judge finds that it was approved by the board of public works,’ and properly indorsed by the comptroller, as provided by section 52. He also finds that no certificate was attached to said roll *215other than this certificate of its approval by the board of public works, as required by and set forth in section 52, and that no record was made showing the manner in which the lands upon said roll were assessed. Nowhere, then, does it appear, unless | in the record, and the circuit judge finds that it was approved by the board of public works,’ and properly indorsed by the comptroller, as provided by section 52.<|sentence|> He also finds that no certificate was attached to said roll *215other than this certificate of its approval by the board of public works, as required by and set forth in section 52, and that no record was made showing the manner in which the lands upon said roll were assessed.<|sentence|> Nowhere, then, does it appear, unless |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2157709.json | A stockholder’s action for a breach of trust by the officers of the corporation can be instituted only for the benefit of the corpora*457tion, and only upon the refusal of the corporation to act; and the plaintiff | A stockholder’s action for a breach of trust by the officers of the corporation can be instituted only for the benefit of the corpora*457tion, and only upon the refusal of the corporation to act;<|sentence|> and the plaintiff |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/publication/inclusive-sexual-health-services-practical-guidelines-providers-and-clinics.json | Find Organizations
Materials
Funding
Campaigns
Digital Media Tools
Prevention Program Practices
Training
Basics
Surveillance and Statistics
Guidelines and Recommendations
Introducing NPIN’s Social Community
Where to go for the ABCs of viral hepatitis prevention? Join other professionals on NPIN’s new social | Find Organizations<|paragraph|>
Materials<|paragraph|>
Funding<|paragraph|>
Campaigns<|paragraph|>
Digital Media Tools<|paragraph|>
Prevention Program Practices<|paragraph|>
Training<|paragraph|>
Basics<|paragraph|>
Surveillance and Statistics<|paragraph|>
Guidelines and Recommendations<|paragraph|>
Introducing NPIN’s Social Community<|paragraph|>
Where to go for the ABCs of viral hepatitis prevention?<|sentence|> Join other professionals on NPIN’s new social |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3421860.json | the appointment of the following persons as members of the Ocean Springs Harbor Committee, be, and the same is, hereby ratified and confirmed, to-wit:
Duncan Moran
Leonard Gavins
Willie Dale
Dr. Richard Furr
Edward C. Reynolds
Fred Brooks
A. | the appointment of the following persons as members of the Ocean Springs Harbor Committee, be, and the same is, hereby ratified and confirmed, to-wit:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Duncan Moran<|paragraph|>
Leonard Gavins<|paragraph|>
Willie Dale<|paragraph|>
Dr. Richard Furr<|paragraph|>
Edward C. Reynolds<|paragraph|>
Fred Brooks<|paragraph|>
A. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7395528.json | a valid defense under the Bennett Amendment to Title VII. It provides:
> It shall not be an unlawful employment practice under this subchapter for any employer to differentiate upon the basis of sex in determining the amount of the wages or compensation paid or to be paid to employees of such employer if such differentiation is authorized by the | a valid defense under the Bennett Amendment to Title VII.<|sentence|> It provides:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> It shall not be an unlawful employment practice under this subchapter for any employer to differentiate upon the basis of sex in determining the amount of the wages or compensation paid or to be paid to employees of such employer if such differentiation is authorized by the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.aoc.gov/about-us/work-with-us/careers/how-to-apply.json | UsWork With UsCareers
Application Process
Please read the information below on how to find and apply for job opportunities and internships with the Architect of the Capitol (AOC).
Image
The | UsWork With UsCareers<|paragraph|>
Application Process<|paragraph|>
Please read the information below on how to find and apply for job opportunities and internships with the Architect of the Capitol (AOC).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Image
The |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6891735.json | law and to determine whether the trial court’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, and applied its own judgment to reverse the decision?
> (2) Was it error for [the] Superior Court to recast [petitioner’s complaint for defamation as a claim for breach of contract contrary to this Court’s holdings in *Steiner v. Market,*600 Pa. 515, 522, 968 A.2d 1253, 1257 (2009)[,] and *Bricklayers of W. Pa. Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott’s Development Co.,*[— Pa. -, 90 A. | law and to determine whether the trial court’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, and applied its own judgment to reverse the decision?<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> (2) Was it error for [the] Superior Court to recast [petitioner’s complaint for defamation as a claim for breach of contract contrary to this Court’s holdings in *Steiner v. Market,*600 Pa. 515, 522, 968 A.2d 1253, 1257 (2009)[,] and *Bricklayers of W. Pa. Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott’s Development Co.,*[— Pa. -, 90 A. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5521852.json | (B) Donald Klauber v. United Artists Associated, Inc.
[In each action] Application denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, J | (B) Donald Klauber v. United Artists Associated, Inc.<|paragraph|>
[In each action] Application denied, with $10 costs.<|sentence|> Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, J |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3007335.json | , the west-bound freight track, all the train except the locomotive having gotten upon and moving easterly upon track No. 3, the two cars in the rear being flat cars, the train moving slowly, and Morris F. Donlon, its conductor, standing on the rear end of the rear flat car, he got down therefrom to the ground on the north side of his train and into the middle of track No. 4, the east-bound freight track, with his back to the west, extending his arms as though giving a signal to his engineer, just as two locomotives coupled together and backing slowly easterly on track No. 4 | , the west-bound freight track, all the train except the locomotive having gotten upon and moving easterly upon track No. 3, the two cars in the rear being flat cars, the train moving slowly, and Morris F. Donlon, its conductor, standing on the rear end of the rear flat car, he got down therefrom to the ground on the north side of his train and into the middle of track No. 4, the east-bound freight track, with his back to the west, extending his arms as though giving a signal to his engineer, just as two locomotives coupled together and backing slowly easterly on track No. 4 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8684808.json | L. Hunt Manufacturing Company, to maintain upon the premises an unsafe stove and thereby materially increase the hazard to which the property of the defendant was subjected?
A preliminary question was suggested upon the argument as to whether or not the situation was affected by reason of the fact that the property which formed the subject matter of the sale was a part of a building and so annexed to the freehold as to make its sale the transfer of an interest in real property. It is not claimed that the memorandum, even if the property be considered as an interest in real property, did not sufficiently comply with the requirement of the statute of frauds. The. contract being | L. Hunt Manufacturing Company, to maintain upon the premises an unsafe stove and thereby materially increase the hazard to which the property of the defendant was subjected?<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
A preliminary question was suggested upon the argument as to whether or not the situation was affected by reason of the fact that the property which formed the subject matter of the sale was a part of a building and so annexed to the freehold as to make its sale the transfer of an interest in real property.<|sentence|> It is not claimed that the memorandum, even if the property be considered as an interest in real property, did not sufficiently comply with the requirement of the statute of frauds.<|sentence|> The. contract being |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist_xls/RES_EPG0_R53R02_RLAN_BCFa.xls.json | Contents
Data 1
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/res_epg0_r53r02_rlan_bcfa | Contents<|paragraph|>
Data 1<|paragraph|>
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/res_epg0_r53r02_rlan_bcfa |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3163016.json | in a written request, specifying the charges. In this case the charges specified in the written request of the twenty-five citizens and tax payers were incompetence, favoritism, and gross misconduct in the performance of the official duties of the district attorney.
In his petition to the civil district court for a suspensive appeal, the district | in a written request, specifying the charges.<|sentence|> In this case the charges specified in the written request of the twenty-five citizens and tax payers were incompetence, favoritism, and gross misconduct in the performance of the official duties of the district attorney.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In his petition to the civil district court for a suspensive appeal, the district |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12511333.json | interest.' [ *Spahn* , 977 A.2d at 1151 ]. In order for an interest to be considered 'immediate, there must be a causal connection between the action complained of and the injury to the person challenging it.' *Id.* Therefore, to meet the three requirements for an aggrieved | interest.' [ *Spahn* , 977 A.2d at 1151 ].<|sentence|> In order for an interest to be considered 'immediate, there must be a causal connection between the action complained of and the injury to the person challenging it.'<|sentence|> *Id.*<|sentence|> Therefore, to meet the three requirements for an aggrieved |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/ecfr/2024-09-16/17/200.671-200.699.json | 200
#### Editorial Note:
Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.
#### §§ 200.671-200.699 | 200<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### Editorial Note:<|paragraph|>
Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### §§ 200.671-200.699 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.dla.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=104&ModuleId=47704&Article=2403773.json | the new year might throw, “it won’t stop us from doing the mission.” Some big parts of that, he said, would be continuing “aggressive communications” with customers, staying embedded at every level of their property disposal planning, working toward more thorough auditability, and getting DLA identified as DOD’s “executive agent” for disposal – an official | the new year might throw, “it won’t stop us from doing the mission.”<|sentence|> Some big parts of that, he said, would be continuing “aggressive communications” with customers, staying embedded at every level of their property disposal planning, working toward more thorough auditability, and getting DLA identified as DOD’s “executive agent” for disposal – an official |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nist.gov/media/618891/download.json | Group (TWG3D2T) is seeking feedback on the following
three documents:
• Bylaws
• Appendix A
• Appendix B
Click on each of the document links above to submit your comments. The public comment period is
open until 11:59 | Group (TWG3D2T) is seeking feedback on the following<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
three documents:<|paragraph|>
• Bylaws<|paragraph|>
• Appendix A<|paragraph|>
• Appendix B<|paragraph|>
Click on each of the document links above to submit your comments.<|sentence|> The public comment period is<|paragraph|>
open until 11:59 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11644510.json | ’s complaint which seeks punitive and compensatory damages. Paragraph 32 of the complaint requests that the court issue an order “[gjranting *500plaintiff punitive damages for the willful violation of plaintiffs rights.” In addition, Paragraph 34 seeks an order “[gjranting the plaintiff such other and further relief as may be necessary to put the plaintiff in the position he would have been in but for the acts of the defendants, and such other and further relief as may be appropriate under the circumstances.” As defendants correctly note, claims for punitive and compensatory damages are not permitted in ADEA cases. *Johnson v. Al Tech Specialties,*731 F. | ’s complaint which seeks punitive and compensatory damages.<|sentence|> Paragraph 32 of the complaint requests that the court issue an order “[gjranting *500plaintiff punitive damages for the willful violation of plaintiffs rights.”<|sentence|> In addition, Paragraph 34 seeks an order “[gjranting the plaintiff such other and further relief as may be necessary to put the plaintiff in the position he would have been in but for the acts of the defendants, and such other and further relief as may be appropriate under the circumstances.”<|sentence|> As defendants correctly note, claims for punitive and compensatory damages are not permitted in ADEA cases.<|sentence|> *Johnson v. Al Tech Specialties,*731 F. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10552.json | wjise judicial administration.’ ” *Id.*(quoting *Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equip. Co.,*342 U.S. 180, 183, 72 S.Ct. 219, 221, 96 L.Ed. 200 (1952)). Justice Brennan noted that “as between state and federal courts, the rule is that ‘the pendency of an action in the state court is no bar to proceedings concerning the same matter in the Federal court having jurisdiction ____’” *Id.*(quoting *McClellan v. Carland,*217 U.S. 268, 282, 30 S.Ct. 501, | wjise judicial administration.’ ” *Id.*(quoting *Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equip. Co.,*342 U.S. 180, 183, 72 S.Ct. 219, 221, 96 L.Ed. 200 (1952)).<|sentence|> Justice Brennan noted that “as between state and federal courts, the rule is that ‘the pendency of an action in the state court is no bar to proceedings concerning the same matter in the Federal court having jurisdiction ____’” *Id.*(quoting *McClellan v. Carland,*217 U.S. 268, 282, 30 S.Ct. 501, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cdc.gov/nchs/nnhs/resident_tables_estimates.htm.json | [PDF – 89 KB]
Description: Table 19 provides the percentage of nursing home residents by falls, fractures, weight change, and nutritional approaches. Nursing home residents are tabulated by demographics (age at interview, sex | [PDF – 89 KB]<|paragraph|>
Description: Table 19 provides the percentage of nursing home residents by falls, fractures, weight change, and nutritional approaches.<|sentence|> Nursing home residents are tabulated by demographics (age at interview, sex |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4179198.json | Greek L. Rice is the Attorney General of the state of Mississippi, and he, along with the members of said Unemployment Compensation Commission of Mississippi, are charged with | Greek L. Rice is the Attorney General of the state of Mississippi, and he, along with the members of said Unemployment Compensation Commission of Mississippi, are charged with |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9678611.json | or effects sought to be inspected. *United States v. Matlock,*415 U.S. 164, 94 S.Ct. 988, 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); *State*v. *Jenkins,*340 So.2d 157 (La.1976); *State v. Bartley,*329 So.2d 431 (La.1976); *State v. Wyatt,*327 So.2d 401 (La.1976). We have | or effects sought to be inspected.<|sentence|> *United States v. Matlock,*415 U.S. 164, 94 S.Ct. 988, 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); *State*v. *Jenkins,*340 So.2d 157 (La.1976); *State v. Bartley,*329 So.2d 431 (La.1976); *State v. Wyatt,*327 So.2d 401 (La.1976).<|sentence|> We have |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7613325.json | is partially disabled due to arthritis in her hands, the trial court determined that the wife would require permanent periodic alimony. This permanent periodic alimony was set at $500 per month for a period of sixty months, thereafter to be reduced to $200 per month, until the wife dies or remarries. The trial court denied the wife’s claim of a special equity in the sailing vessel, and of an award of any portion of her attorney’s fees and costs.
The term “special equity” is used to describe “a vested interest in property brought into the marriage or acquired during the marriage because of contribution of | is partially disabled due to arthritis in her hands, the trial court determined that the wife would require permanent periodic alimony.<|sentence|> This permanent periodic alimony was set at $500 per month for a period of sixty months, thereafter to be reduced to $200 per month, until the wife dies or remarries.<|sentence|> The trial court denied the wife’s claim of a special equity in the sailing vessel, and of an award of any portion of her attorney’s fees and costs.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The term “special equity” is used to describe “a vested interest in property brought into the marriage or acquired during the marriage because of contribution of |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3427365.json | , Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
March 26, 1898.)
Action by Leroy Parker against David F. Day.
No opinion. Motion to amend the order of the superior court of Buffalo denied, with $10 costs | , Appellate Division, Fourth Department.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
March 26, 1898.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Action by Leroy Parker against David F. Day.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No opinion.<|sentence|> Motion to amend the order of the superior court of Buffalo denied, with $10 costs |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1353232.json | , JR. v. WILLIAM J. RITGER.
September 30, 1986.
(See 211 *N.J.Super.*644)
Petition for certification denied | , JR. v. WILLIAM J. RITGER.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
September 30, 1986.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(See 211 *N.J.Super.*644)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Petition for certification denied |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5451535.json | ’s argument that the malpractice claim is not property of the estate is also not well-premised. Property of the bankruptcy estate includes “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). Congress enacted § 541 as part of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 with the intent that “property of the estate” be construed broadly and “include practically every conceivable interest a debtor may have in property as of the bankruptcy filing date.” *In re Minton,*348 B.R. 467, 472 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2006). This | ’s argument that the malpractice claim is not property of the estate is also not well-premised.<|sentence|> Property of the bankruptcy estate includes “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.”<|sentence|> 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1).<|sentence|> Congress enacted § 541 as part of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 with the intent that “property of the estate” be construed broadly and “include practically every conceivable interest a debtor may have in property as of the bankruptcy filing date.”<|sentence|> *In re Minton,*348 B.R. 467, 472 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2006).<|sentence|> This |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5743598.json | used *actual*habitat conditions as allowed by *Nat'l Wildlife Fed’n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.,*524 F.3d 917, 924 (9th Cir.2008).
*297Nor was | used *actual*habitat conditions as allowed by *Nat'l Wildlife Fed’n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.,*524 F.3d 917, 924 (9th Cir.2008).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*297Nor was |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4374629.json | appellant in *Davis*v. *Porter,*66 Cal. 658. On the authority of that case the judgment of the court below must be affirmed, not alone because it has been so decided by this court, but because it was correctly decided, for the reasons stated in the opinion.
In this case a demand was made on the treasurer for the payment of the annual interest provided for by the coupons, and interest on the amount due on such coupons from the time the same matured. The treasurer offered to pay the amount called for by the coupons, on delivery of such coupons | appellant in *Davis*v. *Porter,*66 Cal. 658.<|sentence|> On the authority of that case the judgment of the court below must be affirmed, not alone because it has been so decided by this court, but because it was correctly decided, for the reasons stated in the opinion.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In this case a demand was made on the treasurer for the payment of the annual interest provided for by the coupons, and interest on the amount due on such coupons from the time the same matured.<|sentence|> The treasurer offered to pay the amount called for by the coupons, on delivery of such coupons |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1261422.json | notes due and payable at an earlier date than mentioned therein for the purpose of permitting a common law action to be based thereon, and that the plaintiffs should not maintain their action on said notes until | notes due and payable at an earlier date than mentioned therein for the purpose of permitting a common law action to be based thereon, and that the plaintiffs should not maintain their action on said notes until |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6837887.json | determinátion is captured by the requirement of RCr 10.26, which allows for relief from unpreserved error only when it results in “manifest injustice.” THe proponent of palpable error must show the “probability of a different result or error so fundamental as to threaten a defendant’s entitlement to due process of law.” *Martin v. Commonwealth,*207 S.W.3d 1, 3 (Ky.2006). “To discover manifest injustice, | determinátion is captured by the requirement of RCr 10.26, which allows for relief from unpreserved error only when it results in “manifest injustice.”<|sentence|> THe proponent of palpable error must show the “probability of a different result or error so fundamental as to threaten a defendant’s entitlement to due process of law.”<|sentence|> *Martin v. Commonwealth,*207 S.W.3d 1, 3 (Ky.2006).<|sentence|> “To discover manifest injustice, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=topic:4270&f[1]=topic:14786&f[2]=type:publications.json | BCG Vaccine
(23)Behavioral/Social Science
(5)Behavioral Research
(4)Bisexuals
(1)Blood Tests
(1)Blood Transfusions
(1)Cancer
(19)Caregivers
(1)Case Management
(99)CDC Programs/Policies
(2)Child | BCG Vaccine<|paragraph|>
(23)Behavioral/Social Science<|paragraph|>
(5)Behavioral Research<|paragraph|>
(4)Bisexuals<|paragraph|>
(1)Blood Tests<|paragraph|>
(1)Blood Transfusions<|paragraph|>
(1)Cancer<|paragraph|>
(19)Caregivers<|paragraph|>
(1)Case Management<|paragraph|>
(99)CDC Programs/Policies<|paragraph|>
(2)Child |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.census.gov/quickfacts/geo/chart/obetzvillageohio,cincinnaticityohio/PST045223.json | city, Ohio
Sylvania city, Ohio
Ashland city, Ohio
Pataskala city, Ohio
Tallmadge city, Ohio
Niles city, Ohio
Steubenville city, Ohio
Brook Park city, Ohio
Berea city, Ohio | city, Ohio<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Sylvania city, Ohio<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Ashland city, Ohio<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Pataskala city, Ohio<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Tallmadge city, Ohio<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Niles city, Ohio<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Steubenville city, Ohio<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Brook Park city, Ohio<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Berea city, Ohio |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4176490.json | that material seized from defendant was cocaine where the testimony was given by a SBI forensic chemist based on the reports of another chemist who performed the tests. It is obvious from the testimony that the witness was merely reporting the results of other experts.
Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 16 April 2009 by Judge James U. Downs in Superior Court, Swain County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 8 March 2010.
*Attorney General | that material seized from defendant was cocaine where the testimony was given by a SBI forensic chemist based on the reports of another chemist who performed the tests.<|sentence|> It is obvious from the testimony that the witness was merely reporting the results of other experts.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 16 April 2009 by Judge James U. Downs in Superior Court, Swain County.<|sentence|> Heard in the Court of Appeals 8 March 2010.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Attorney General |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12499706.json | , if a procedure is suggestive in any manner and to any degree, that suggestiveness automatically and fully negates the correlation. The trial court's conclusion that Rivera's confidence was indicative of accuracy is also supported by the fact that Rivera's description of the defendant was, in fact, accurate. Finally, the defendant has not identified any evidence that he was prevented from presenting at the suppression hearing or at trial on the ground that it was not relevant under *Biggers* . Accordingly, we | , if a procedure is suggestive in any manner and to any degree, that suggestiveness automatically and fully negates the correlation.<|sentence|> The trial court's conclusion that Rivera's confidence was indicative of accuracy is also supported by the fact that Rivera's description of the defendant was, in fact, accurate.<|sentence|> Finally, the defendant has not identified any evidence that he was prevented from presenting at the suppression hearing or at trial on the ground that it was not relevant under *Biggers* .<|sentence|> Accordingly, we |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nsa.gov/Portals/75/documents/news-features/declassified-documents/friedman-documents/reports-research/FOLDER_488/41718889075819.pdf.json | General C3'7'Pta~ i'.ranela. be augwnted 1n ~n8fttlty md flU8li\1 ot ~r.ormal in Ol'dftt to | General C3'7'Pta~ i'.ranela. be augwnted 1n ~n8fttlty md flU8li\1 ot ~r.ormal in Ol'dftt to |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.