source_identifier
stringlengths 40
303
⌀ | input
stringlengths 0
32.9k
| output
stringlengths 0
32.9k
|
|---|---|---|
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3925750.json | we deny the petition for review.
The IJ properly concluded that Pazarin-Castrejon’s conviction for violating California Health and Safety Code § 11378 | we deny the petition for review.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The IJ properly concluded that Pazarin-Castrejon’s conviction for violating California Health and Safety Code § 11378 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11642497.json | Northwest Airlines, Inc.,*627 F.2d 272, 276 (D.C.Cir.1980). Whether or not the present claims are covered by ERISA, therefore, they are subject to the primary and exclusive jurisdiction of the Adjustment Board, except insofar as any independent claims of Mrs. Beard may be concerned.
The appeal of defendants The Travelers and The Travelers Companies is DISMISSED. The appeal of defendants Car-rollton Railroad and CSX Transportation, | Northwest Airlines, Inc.,*627 F.2d 272, 276 (D.C.Cir.1980).<|sentence|> Whether or not the present claims are covered by ERISA, therefore, they are subject to the primary and exclusive jurisdiction of the Adjustment Board, except insofar as any independent claims of Mrs. Beard may be concerned.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The appeal of defendants The Travelers and The Travelers Companies is DISMISSED.<|sentence|> The appeal of defendants Car-rollton Railroad and CSX Transportation, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10124240.json | contention. The Bell case does not assist appellants. In State ex rel. Edie v. Shain, supra,348 Mo. 119, 124, 152 S.W.2d 174, 177, appears language appropriate here, as follows: “It is true that in the case of Bell v. Barrett, * * * we held that there was insufficient evidence in that record to sustain a finding of adverse possession, but the facts were wholly different from, those in the case at bar. * * * [I]n the Bell case * * * the evidence was clear that the person claiming adverse possession had occupied the land | contention.<|sentence|> The Bell case does not assist appellants.<|sentence|> In State ex rel. Edie v. Shain, supra,348 Mo. 119, 124, 152 S.W.2d 174, 177, appears language appropriate here, as follows: “It is true that in the case of Bell v. Barrett, * * * we held that there was insufficient evidence in that record to sustain a finding of adverse possession, but the facts were wholly different from, those in the case at bar.<|sentence|> * * * [I]n the Bell case * * * the evidence was clear that the person claiming adverse possession had occupied the land |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4268421.json | cases involving the validity of wills, then the federal courts sitting in that state are also without jurisdiction of an action contesting the validity of a will. These cases are, how*170ever, inapposite here, as in New York, the court of general original jurisdiction, the Supreme | cases involving the validity of wills, then the federal courts sitting in that state are also without jurisdiction of an action contesting the validity of a will.<|sentence|> These cases are, how*170ever, inapposite here, as in New York, the court of general original jurisdiction, the Supreme |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.state.nj.us/governor/news/news/562023/approved/20230330b.shtml.json | resilient system that allows voice, photos, videos and text messages to flow seamlessly from the public to the 911 network. NG911 will also improve public safety answering points’ ability to help manage call overload, natural disasters, and transfer of 911 calls based on caller location data. The PSAP Grant Program is administered by the Office of Emergency Telecommunications Services within the Office of Information Technology. The four additional counties receiving funding were notified on March 21, 2023. | resilient system that allows voice, photos, videos and text messages to flow seamlessly from the public to the 911 network.<|sentence|> NG911 will also improve public safety answering points’ ability to help manage call overload, natural disasters, and transfer of 911 calls based on caller location data.<|sentence|> The PSAP Grant Program is administered by the Office of Emergency Telecommunications Services within the Office of Information Technology.<|sentence|> The four additional counties receiving funding were notified on March 21, 2023. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.fda.gov/news-events/expanded-access-compassionate-use/example-wording-letter-authorization-loa-individual-patient-expanded-access-ind.json | Drugs
Medical Devices
Radiation-Emitting Products
Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
Animal and Veterinary
Cosmetics
Tobacco ProductsTopics
About FDA
Combination Products
Regulatory Information
Safety
Emergency Preparedness
International Programs
News and Events
Training and Continuing Education
Inspections and Compliance
Science | Drugs<|paragraph|>
Medical Devices<|paragraph|>
Radiation-Emitting Products<|paragraph|>
Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics<|paragraph|>
Animal and Veterinary<|paragraph|>
Cosmetics<|paragraph|>
Tobacco ProductsTopics<|paragraph|>
About FDA<|paragraph|>
Combination Products<|paragraph|>
Regulatory Information<|paragraph|>
Safety<|paragraph|>
Emergency Preparedness<|paragraph|>
International Programs<|paragraph|>
News and Events<|paragraph|>
Training and Continuing Education<|paragraph|>
Inspections and Compliance<|paragraph|>
Science |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8701017.json | east of the train traveling toward the train, and he testified to the effect that he saw the train coming; that it passed over the avenue while he was going west on the avenue; that he first saw the headlight, then the train; that the headlight was very dim and | east of the train traveling toward the train, and he testified to the effect that he saw the train coming;<|sentence|> that it passed over the avenue while he was going west on the avenue;<|sentence|> that he first saw the headlight, then the train;<|sentence|> that the headlight was very dim and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/701099.json | or level way of travel.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) *Associated Distributors v. Canup,*115 Ga. App. 152, 153 (154 SE2d 32) (1967). Accord *Hughes v. Winn-Dixie Stores,*142 Ga. App. 110 (1) (235 SE2d 619) (1977 | or level way of travel.”<|sentence|> (Citations and punctuation omitted.)<|sentence|> *Associated Distributors v. Canup,*115 Ga. App. 152, 153 (154 SE2d 32) (1967).<|sentence|> Accord *Hughes v. Winn-Dixie Stores,*142 Ga. App. 110 (1) (235 SE2d 619) (1977 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5633836.json | , the same disability should be applied to prevent the disclosure of what may have, in that manner, been elicited from either of the parties, as it would be where the individual employed was in fact an attorney at law. At all events, this person was acting in the interest of the defendant in obtaining this assignment, and was identified to that extent with the interests and objects of the defendant. The affidavits of George | , the same disability should be applied to prevent the disclosure of what may have, in that manner, been elicited from either of the parties, as it would be where the individual employed was in fact an attorney at law.<|sentence|> At all events, this person was acting in the interest of the defendant in obtaining this assignment, and was identified to that extent with the interests and objects of the defendant.<|sentence|> The affidavits of George |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6572531.json | the links of which are of stock essentially round in cross section, and parts thereof:
> 652.24 Under 5/16 inch in diameter_ *1.7 ‡*per lb.
> Schedule 6, Part 4, Subpart C
> 666.00 Machinery for soil preparation and cultivation, * * * and agricultural and horticultural implements not specially provided for, and parts of any of the foregoing | the links of which are of stock essentially round in cross section, and parts thereof:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> 652.24 Under 5/16 inch in diameter_ *1.7 ‡*per lb.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> Schedule 6, Part 4, Subpart C<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> 666.00 Machinery for soil preparation and cultivation, * * * and agricultural and horticultural implements not specially provided for, and parts of any of the foregoing |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1299592.json | track to receive his undergraduate degree, and had been working in the computer field for 17 years. He admitted that his credit report, which he furnished to his parents, contained a number of adverse reports from other creditors besides Sears. Though terminated by his last full-time employer in June, 1997, his severance package benefits provided for his salary continuation through year end 1997. By the time of trial, he contended that he should | track to receive his undergraduate degree, and had been working in the computer field for 17 years.<|sentence|> He admitted that his credit report, which he furnished to his parents, contained a number of adverse reports from other creditors besides Sears.<|sentence|> Though terminated by his last full-time employer in June, 1997, his severance package benefits provided for his salary continuation through year end 1997.<|sentence|> By the time of trial, he contended that he should |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3996879.json | that retroactive application of Amendment 591 would lower his sentencing range because the Statutory Index in Appendix A specifies only one Chapter Two offense guideline for his witness tampering offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b). However, the Statutory Index in the 1991 Guidelines Manual lists three offense conduct guidelines for § 1512(b): “2A1.2, 2A2.2, 2J1.2.” As the subsequent amendment of this list was not retroactive, *see*U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(c), p.s., the changes to the Statutory Index do not benefit Patel under § | that retroactive application of Amendment 591 would lower his sentencing range because the Statutory Index in Appendix A specifies only one Chapter Two offense guideline for his witness tampering offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b).<|sentence|> However, the Statutory Index in the 1991 Guidelines Manual lists three offense conduct guidelines for § 1512(b): “2A1.2, 2A2.2, 2J1.2.”<|sentence|> As the subsequent amendment of this list was not retroactive, *see*U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(c), p.s., the changes to the Statutory Index do not benefit Patel under § |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9681766.json | two suits were filed by Mr. Woods, individually and as tutor of his daughter, Tanya Woods. No. 10987 is for damages for the wrongful death of Lorraine Woods, and No. 10988 is for the personal injuries suffered by T | two suits were filed by Mr. Woods, individually and as tutor of his daughter, Tanya Woods.<|sentence|> No. 10987 is for damages for the wrongful death of Lorraine Woods, and No. 10988 is for the personal injuries suffered by T |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10030516.json | it is not a special acknowledgment .of the debt which is necessary in order to inter*139rupt prescription. R.C.C. Arts. 2997 and 3520. In addition to these considerations, it is proper | it is not a special acknowledgment .of the debt which is necessary in order to inter*139rupt prescription.<|sentence|> R.C.C. Arts. 2997 and 3520.<|sentence|> In addition to these considerations, it is proper |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10671854.json | A (1977); *Johnson v. Dirkswager,*315 N.W.2d 215, 223 (Minn.1982).
Once the school board voted to discharge Pre | A (1977); *Johnson v. Dirkswager,*315 N.W.2d 215, 223 (Minn.1982).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Once the school board voted to discharge Pre |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3622681.json | (affirming award of attorney fees and costs in civil contempt proceeding while dismissing court’s finding of contempt for lack of final, appealable order). See, also, *In re Marriage of Crow and Gilmore,*103 S.W.3d 778 (Mo. 2003) (holding that award of fees in civil contempt proceeding was appealable even though merits of contempt order itself were not final or appealable).
In the instant case, RKM contends that the court erred in ordering RKM to pay $73,500 of SFAC’ | (affirming award of attorney fees and costs in civil contempt proceeding while dismissing court’s finding of contempt for lack of final, appealable order).<|sentence|> See, also, *In re Marriage of Crow and Gilmore,*103 S.W.3d 778 (Mo. 2003) (holding that award of fees in civil contempt proceeding was appealable even though merits of contempt order itself were not final or appealable).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In the instant case, RKM contends that the court erred in ordering RKM to pay $73,500 of SFAC’ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1897352.json | , Supreme Ct, Suffolk County), are clearly distinguishable from the facts presented in this action and whereas this court is satisfied that comparable by-laws or rules of a condominium complex may be enforceable (cf. Real Property Law, §§ 339-j, 339-u, 339-v, subd 2, par [a]), this court finds that this rule would unduly restrict the tenants’ statutory right to sell a mobile home. Section 233 (subd f, par 3, cl [e | , Supreme Ct, Suffolk County), are clearly distinguishable from the facts presented in this action and whereas this court is satisfied that comparable by-laws or rules of a condominium complex may be enforceable (cf. Real Property Law, §§ 339-j, 339-u, 339-v, subd 2, par [a]), this court finds that this rule would unduly restrict the tenants’ statutory right to sell a mobile home.<|sentence|> Section 233 (subd f, par 3, cl [e |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11304411.json | to the said grantees, or to the said grantees and other creditors.
The jury further find upon- the *second issue,*that the said *Gittings*and. *Smith,*within the time aforesaid, did convey and t-ansfer to the said *William Taylor,*a vessel purchased by them from * | to the said grantees, or to the said grantees and other creditors.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The jury further find upon- the *second issue,*that the said *Gittings*and. *Smith,*within the time aforesaid, did convey and t-ansfer to the said *William Taylor,*a vessel purchased by them from * |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/oasdi_zip/2021/vi.html.json | OASDI Beneficiaries by State and ZIP Code, 2021
Social Security AdministrationResearch, Statistics & Policy AnalysisOASDI Beneficiaries by State and ZIP Code, 2021
- Email
- Excel
- Save/Print
# U.S. Virgin Islands
Previous: Puerto RicoTop of pageTable of contents
#### Important Information:
- About Us
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Open Government
- Glossary
- Privacy
- Report Fraud, Waste or Abuse | OASDI Beneficiaries by State and ZIP Code, 2021<|paragraph|>
Social Security AdministrationResearch, Statistics & Policy AnalysisOASDI Beneficiaries by State and ZIP Code, 2021<|paragraph|>
- Email<|sentence|>
- Excel<|sentence|>
- Save/Print<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
# U.S. Virgin Islands<|paragraph|>
Previous: Puerto RicoTop of pageTable of contents<|paragraph|>
#### Important Information:<|paragraph|>
- About Us<|sentence|>
- Accessibility<|sentence|>
- FOIA<|sentence|>
- Open Government<|sentence|>
- Glossary<|sentence|>
- Privacy<|sentence|>
- Report Fraud, Waste or Abuse |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2071499.json | judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial' should be affirmed, with costs.
Pratt, J.
The whole question submitted to the jury was as to the amount of damages, and we are of- opinion that the verdict is-not so large that we are warranted in interfering with it. The jury, no doubt, put faith in the evidence of plaintiff’s witness as-to the extent of the injuries. That was within their province.
There was no error of law committed, and the | judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial' should be affirmed, with costs.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Pratt, J.<|paragraph|>
The whole question submitted to the jury was as to the amount of damages, and we are of- opinion that the verdict is-not so large that we are warranted in interfering with it.<|sentence|> The jury, no doubt, put faith in the evidence of plaintiff’s witness as-to the extent of the injuries.<|sentence|> That was within their province.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
There was no error of law committed, and the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.wapa.gov/index.html?page_id=13652.json | kV transmission lines. ( see map , same location as Phase 3 above with 7 jumper alternative locations)
### PROJECT LOCATION
The project’s components are located within 16 miles of Parker, | kV transmission lines. ( see map , same location as Phase 3 above with 7 jumper alternative locations)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
### PROJECT LOCATION<|paragraph|>
The project’s components are located within 16 miles of Parker, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1172606.json | residential occupant of the unit under the Loft Law (29 RCNY 2-09 [b] [2]) was supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. Infrequent occasional use does not constitute residency for the purposes of Loft Law protection *(see, Matter of Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v New York City Loft Bd.,*66 NY2d 298, *affg*104 AD2d 223 | residential occupant of the unit under the Loft Law (29 RCNY 2-09 [b] [2]) was supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.<|sentence|> Infrequent occasional use does not constitute residency for the purposes of Loft Law protection *(see, Matter of Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v New York City Loft Bd.,*66 NY2d 298, *affg*104 AD2d 223 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.occ.gov/news-issuances/congressional-testimony/2019/ct-2019-70-oral.pdf.json | rigorous standards. Fintech companies may choose to consider a full-service national
bank charter to engage in the full array of authorized national bank activities, including
accepting deposits, or to apply for a variety of other limited purpose charters if they are
engaged in a limited range of banking activities. Regardless of the particular path that a
fintech company chooses, all national banks face rigorous examination and high
standards that include capital, liquidity, compliance, financial inclusion, and consumer
protection standards.
My written statement also includes some principles for the Task Force | rigorous standards.<|sentence|> Fintech companies may choose to consider a full-service national
bank charter to engage in the full array of authorized national bank activities, including
accepting deposits, or to apply for a variety of other limited purpose charters if they are
engaged in a limited range of banking activities.<|sentence|> Regardless of the particular path that a
fintech company chooses, all national banks face rigorous examination and high
standards that include capital, liquidity, compliance, financial inclusion, and consumer
protection standards.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
My written statement also includes some principles for the Task Force |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3839913.json | *1251any work performance of the employees. Also, these employees still have a basis for demanding that Midwest pay their full salaries for the two weeks. Those claims may not be collectible, but they | *1251any work performance of the employees.<|sentence|> Also, these employees still have a basis for demanding that Midwest pay their full salaries for the two weeks.<|sentence|> Those claims may not be collectible, but they |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/498101.json | Holy Cross,*155 Md. 146. *Bird*v. *Merklee,*144 N. Y. 544. *Sherman*v. *Richmond Hose | Holy Cross,*155 Md. 146.<|sentence|> *Bird*v. *Merklee,*144 N. Y. 544.<|sentence|> *Sherman*v. *Richmond Hose |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/p524--2004.pdf.json | Substantial gainful activity is not work you do to take
ent) to claim the exemption by signing a written care of yourself or your home. It is not unpaid work on
declaration (such as Form 8332, Release of Claim hobbies, institutional therapy or training, school attendance, clubs, social programs, and similar activities. How- to Exemption for Child of Divorced or Separated
Parents) that you will | Substantial gainful activity is not work you do to take<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
ent) to claim the exemption by signing a written care of yourself or your home.<|sentence|> It is not unpaid work on<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
declaration (such as Form 8332, Release of Claim hobbies, institutional therapy or training, school attendance, clubs, social programs, and similar activities.<|sentence|> How- to Exemption for Child of Divorced or Separated<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Parents) that you will |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9025054.json | *Notice of Motion, Ex. F, Nov. 19, 2002 Decision by Justice Eileen Bransten (“Nov.2002 Bransten Decision”), at 4; Compl. ¶ 114.
Shortly before the DHCR’s final order | *Notice of Motion, Ex. F, Nov. 19, 2002 Decision by Justice Eileen Bransten (“Nov.2002 Bransten Decision”), at 4; Compl. ¶ 114.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Shortly before the DHCR’s final order |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5044850.json | was able to *135secure on a sale. In support of his claim he offered evidence tending to show that he had procured a purchaser ready, able and willing to purchase at the price of five dollars a gallon.
The plaintiff’s proposed purchaser was a resident of Constantinople and negotiations for the sale and purchase were there carried on personally by the | was able to *135secure on a sale.<|sentence|> In support of his claim he offered evidence tending to show that he had procured a purchaser ready, able and willing to purchase at the price of five dollars a gallon.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The plaintiff’s proposed purchaser was a resident of Constantinople and negotiations for the sale and purchase were there carried on personally by the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/index.html?seqNo115=411149.json | novel strategies to improve human health and mitigate agriculture-associated fungal diseases.
Technical Abstract: The Homeobox Domain (HD) proteins present a crucial involvement in morphological differentiation and other functions in Eukaryotes. Most HD genes encode | novel strategies to improve human health and mitigate agriculture-associated fungal diseases.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Technical Abstract: The Homeobox Domain (HD) proteins present a crucial involvement in morphological differentiation and other functions in Eukaryotes.<|sentence|> Most HD genes encode |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ams.usda.gov/content/maryland-department-agriculture.json | Industry MeetingsSearch (optional)
About AMS
News & Announcements
Contact Us Maryland Department of Agriculture Breadcrumb
Home
Maryland Department of Agriculture
Home
Market News
Rules & Regulations
Grades & Standards
Services
Resources
Commodity ProcurementFee Schedules
Maryland AMA Fee.pdf
(278.32 KB)
MDA USGSA Fees.pdf | Industry MeetingsSearch (optional)<|paragraph|>
About AMS<|paragraph|>
News & Announcements<|sentence|>
Contact Us Maryland Department of Agriculture Breadcrumb<|sentence|>
Home<|sentence|>
Maryland Department of Agriculture<|sentence|>
Home<|paragraph|>
Market News<|sentence|>
Rules & Regulations<|sentence|>
Grades & Standards<|sentence|>
Services<|sentence|>
Resources<|sentence|>
Commodity ProcurementFee Schedules<|sentence|>
Maryland AMA Fee.pdf<|sentence|>
(278.32 KB)<|sentence|>
MDA USGSA Fees.pdf |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10815010.json | to be paid before November 3, 1970, and the Preliminary Executors determined that in order to comply with Section 6151(a) and minimize the imposition of interest, the estate tax payment should be made before November 3, 1970. It was estimated that if the New York will were probated, the federal estate tax would be approximately $973,000, whereas, if the Connecticut will were probated, the estimated tax would amount to either $619,000 or $609,000. It was then decided that the | to be paid before November 3, 1970, and the Preliminary Executors determined that in order to comply with Section 6151(a) and minimize the imposition of interest, the estate tax payment should be made before November 3, 1970.<|sentence|> It was estimated that if the New York will were probated, the federal estate tax would be approximately $973,000, whereas, if the Connecticut will were probated, the estimated tax would amount to either $619,000 or $609,000.<|sentence|> It was then decided that the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3165014.json | #### CLINE et al., Appellants, v. STEPHENS et al., Respondents.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department..
May 22, 1913.)
Action by Timothy Cline and others against William M. Stephens and others.
No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. See, | #### CLINE et al., Appellants, v. STEPHENS et al., Respondents.<|paragraph|>
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department..<|paragraph|>
May 22, 1913.)<|paragraph|>
Action by Timothy Cline and others against William M. Stephens and others.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No opinion.<|sentence|> Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.<|sentence|> See, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5674502.json | our power to review in the interest of justice an unpreserved claim with respect to the plea allocution. Nor does there exist any reason to set aside the sentence imposed, which was agreed to in the course of plea negotiations *(see, People v | our power to review in the interest of justice an unpreserved claim with respect to the plea allocution.<|sentence|> Nor does there exist any reason to set aside the sentence imposed, which was agreed to in the course of plea negotiations *(see, People v |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2016744.json | . The tenant counterclaimed because of his contention that the landlord had not lived up to his agreement. Because the landlord had accepted rent, his claim for eviction was dismissed. Because the *100tenant did not prove his counterclaim, it was dismissed.1 However, by interlocutory order, the trial judge determined that a tenancy at will existed between the parties.2 The landlord then sent the required statutory notice to the tenant, advising him that the tenancy at will was terminated; the tenant refused to vacate, and Case No. 214 AP was filed seeking to evict | . The tenant counterclaimed because of his contention that the landlord had not lived up to his agreement.<|sentence|> Because the landlord had accepted rent, his claim for eviction was dismissed.<|sentence|> Because the *100tenant did not prove his counterclaim, it was dismissed.1<|sentence|> However, by interlocutory order, the trial judge determined that a tenancy at will existed between the parties.2<|sentence|> The landlord then sent the required statutory notice to the tenant, advising him that the tenancy at will was terminated; the tenant refused to vacate, and Case No. 214 AP was filed seeking to evict |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12695569.json | 10 a.m. on April 17, 2017, Brandon Holifield, a patrolman with the Richland Police Department, was traveling south on Highway 49 in the City of Richland in Rankin County. Upon | 10 a.m. on April 17, 2017, Brandon Holifield, a patrolman with the Richland Police Department, was traveling south on Highway 49 in the City of Richland in Rankin County.<|sentence|> Upon |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/612183.json | , v Ronald D. Persaud, Appellant.
[798 NYS2d 495]
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated January 27, 2005, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
On October 23, 2000, the plaintiff allegedly was injured when, upon exiting her parked vehicle, she opened her driver-side door and | , v Ronald D. Persaud, Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
[798 NYS2d 495]<|paragraph|>
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated January 27, 2005, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
On October 23, 2000, the plaintiff allegedly was injured when, upon exiting her parked vehicle, she opened her driver-side door and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2677213.json | #### In the Matter of Robert Steen, Respondent, against The County of Nassau et al., Appellants.
No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ. [179 Misc. 821.] | #### In the Matter of Robert Steen, Respondent, against The County of Nassau et al., Appellants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No opinion.<|sentence|> Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.<|sentence|> [179 Misc. 821.] |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4205774.json | Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 933, in 1938, it is only when compensation is paid “under an award in a compensation order filed by the deputy commissioner” that the employee’s acceptance thereof effects an assignment to the employer of the employee’s right to recover damages against the third party. Conceding for present purposes that the payment of compensation was not “under an award” within the meaning of this section, this results | Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 933, in 1938, it is only when compensation is paid “under an award in a compensation order filed by the deputy commissioner” that the employee’s acceptance thereof effects an assignment to the employer of the employee’s right to recover damages against the third party.<|sentence|> Conceding for present purposes that the payment of compensation was not “under an award” within the meaning of this section, this results |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/ecfr/2024-09-16/24/200.56.json | Note on Part 200
#### Editorial Note:
Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.
#### § 200.56 Assurance of completion for on-site improvements.
The mortgagor shall furnish assurance of completion of the project in the form and amount provided by terms, conditions and standards established | Note on Part 200<|paragraph|>
#### Editorial Note:<|paragraph|>
Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### § 200.56 Assurance of completion for on-site improvements.<|paragraph|>
The mortgagor shall furnish assurance of completion of the project in the form and amount provided by terms, conditions and standards established |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/asl/about-asl/index.html.json | EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
The White House
USA.gov
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
Sign Up for Email Updates
Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.
Sign Up | EEO/No Fear ActFOIA<|paragraph|>
The White House<|paragraph|>
USA.gov<|paragraph|>
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy<|sentence|>
Sign Up for Email Updates<|paragraph|>
Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Sign Up |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10921241.json | process and [the suspension notification statute.] Furthermore, the necessary additional expense does not justify the denial of the basic standards of procedural due process. By providing such notice, the bureau need perform cross-checks only when [a suspension no*1265tice] is sent to a licensee, not when | process and [the suspension notification statute.]<|sentence|> Furthermore, the necessary additional expense does not justify the denial of the basic standards of procedural due process.<|sentence|> By providing such notice, the bureau need perform cross-checks only when [a suspension no*1265tice] is sent to a licensee, not when |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ihs.gov/forpatients/healthtopics/zika-virus/reporting-and-surveillance/index.html.json | Alaska Area
Albuquerque Area
Bemidji Area
Billings Area
California Area
Great Plains Area
Nashville Area
Navajo Area
Oklahoma City Area
Phoenix Area
Portland Area
Tucson Area
IHS - Locations
for Patients
Affordable Care Act (ACA)
Find Health Care
Frequently Asked Questions
Health Care
Health Topics
Improve Your Health
Patient Forms | Alaska Area<|paragraph|>
Albuquerque Area<|paragraph|>
Bemidji Area<|paragraph|>
Billings Area<|paragraph|>
California Area<|paragraph|>
Great Plains Area<|paragraph|>
Nashville Area<|paragraph|>
Navajo Area<|paragraph|>
Oklahoma City Area<|paragraph|>
Phoenix Area<|paragraph|>
Portland Area<|paragraph|>
Tucson Area<|paragraph|>
IHS - Locations<|paragraph|>
for Patients<|paragraph|>
Affordable Care Act (ACA)<|paragraph|>
Find Health Care<|paragraph|>
Frequently Asked Questions<|paragraph|>
Health Care<|paragraph|>
Health Topics<|paragraph|>
Improve Your Health<|paragraph|>
Patient Forms |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12576632.json | a felony in violation of NRS 212.165. For purposes of SCR 111, the felony conviction is a "serious crime." SCR 111(6). Normally, upon being informed that an attorney has been convicted of a "serious crime," this court is required to impose an immediate temporary suspension and refer the attorney to the appropriate disciplinary board for a hearing to determine the extent of the discipline to be imposed. SCR 111(7), (8). But | a felony in violation of NRS 212.165.<|sentence|> For purposes of SCR 111, the felony conviction is a "serious crime."<|sentence|> SCR 111(6).<|sentence|> Normally, upon being informed that an attorney has been convicted of a "serious crime," this court is required to impose an immediate temporary suspension and refer the attorney to the appropriate disciplinary board for a hearing to determine the extent of the discipline to be imposed.<|sentence|> SCR 111(7), (8).<|sentence|> But |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3797706.json | lost control. *Id.*at 685. Fullwood argued that this statement was material under *Brady*because it would have afforded him a diminished capacity defense and mitigated | lost control.<|sentence|> *Id.*at 685.<|sentence|> Fullwood argued that this statement was material under *Brady*because it would have afforded him a diminished capacity defense and mitigated |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9565597.json | grounds that the plaintiff had failed to effect a legally sufficient notice to the owner and that the claim as against the surety was untimely due to untimely joinder. The trial court held that the | grounds that the plaintiff had failed to effect a legally sufficient notice to the owner and that the claim as against the surety was untimely due to untimely joinder.<|sentence|> The trial court held that the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.census.gov/quickfacts/geo/chart/rockdalecitytexas,arlingtoncitytexas,US/PST045223.json | Texas
Northlake town, Texas
Jacinto City city, Texas
Kaufman city, Texas
Providence Village town, Texas
Cleveland city, Texas
� | Texas<|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Northlake town, Texas<|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Jacinto City city, Texas<|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Kaufman city, Texas<|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Providence Village town, Texas<|paragraph|>
<|paragraph|>
Cleveland city, Texas<|paragraph|>
� |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11755718.json | .
#### Board of Public Instruction of Manatee County, Florida, et al. *v.*Harvest et al.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari | .<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### Board of Public Instruction of Manatee County, Florida, et al. *v.*Harvest et al.<|paragraph|>
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9559245.json | 5, 1980.
James H. Heidelberg, Fielding L. Wright, Wright & Heidelberg, Pascagoula, for appellant.
Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Susan L. Runnels, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Clinton E. Lockard, Judge.
Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and | 5, 1980.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
James H. Heidelberg, Fielding L. Wright, Wright & Heidelberg, Pascagoula, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Susan L. Runnels, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Clinton E. Lockard, Judge.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6105230.json | Statement encumbering certain personal property owned by Westside in addition to its certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate as a utility company. Problems developed with the well; so on November 13, 1980, Westside’s attorney noticed | Statement encumbering certain personal property owned by Westside in addition to its certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate as a utility company.<|sentence|> Problems developed with the well; so on November 13, 1980, Westside’s attorney noticed |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4444264.json | misdemean- or is repealed, “except in cases that relate to a *trespass*upon the person or property of individuals.” The terms used in this statute are somewhat of doubtful interpretation, but we cannot construe them to embrace every case of aggravated misdemeanors, such as cutting stabbing, &c., as is the present case. We think the operation of the act should, in its requisition, be confined strictly to indictments for *trespass*on the person or property of individuals, and ought not to be understood as embracing cases of *high misdemeanor,*when the indictment may be regarded as exclusively | misdemean- or is repealed, “except in cases that relate to a *trespass*upon the person or property of individuals.”<|sentence|> The terms used in this statute are somewhat of doubtful interpretation, but we cannot construe them to embrace every case of aggravated misdemeanors, such as cutting stabbing, &c., as is the present case.<|sentence|> We think the operation of the act should, in its requisition, be confined strictly to indictments for *trespass*on the person or property of individuals, and ought not to be understood as embracing cases of *high misdemeanor,*when the indictment may be regarded as exclusively |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2149953.json | Ct. 164, 31 L. Ed. 216) ; *Aplin v. Board of Supervisors of Grand Traverse County,*73 Mich. 182 (41 N. W. 223, 16 Am. St. Rep. 576); *People v. Dulaney,*96 Ill. | Ct. 164, 31 L. Ed. 216) ; *Aplin v. Board of Supervisors of Grand Traverse County,*73 Mich. 182 (41 N. W. 223, 16 Am. St. Rep. 576); *People v. Dulaney,*96 Ill. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/stats.bls.gov/web/empsit/ces.spec.ae2.zip.json/ces.spec.ae2/AE1021211400.spc | )
}
ESTIMATE{
MAXITER = 3000
}
FORECAST{
MAXLEAD = 24
}
OUTLIER{
CRITICAL = 10.5
TYPES = AO
}
X11{
SEASONALMA = (s3x5)
MODE = ADD
PRINT = (BRIEF)
SAVE = (D | )
}<|paragraph|>
ESTIMATE{<|paragraph|>
MAXITER = 3000<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
}<|paragraph|>
FORECAST{<|paragraph|>
MAXLEAD = 24<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
}<|paragraph|>
OUTLIER{<|paragraph|>
CRITICAL = 10.5<|sentence|>
TYPES = AO<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
}<|paragraph|>
X11{<|paragraph|>
SEASONALMA = (s3x5)<|sentence|>
MODE = ADD<|sentence|>
PRINT = (BRIEF)<|sentence|>
SAVE = (D |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4464910.json | case he desired to do so. And no. reason exists for supposing he failed to do so because of the informality now complained of. And nothing has been shown by him which would justify his omission to appear when he was first required to do so, or excuse him from answering if he had appeared, on either occasion.
The defect relied upon in support of the motion was at most an irregularity which was not shown to have prejudiced the defendant in any way whatever. The import of the order requiring him to appear and show cause was, that he was to be proceeded against for his previous default | case he desired to do so.<|sentence|> And no. reason exists for supposing he failed to do so because of the informality now complained of.<|sentence|> And nothing has been shown by him which would justify his omission to appear when he was first required to do so, or excuse him from answering if he had appeared, on either occasion.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The defect relied upon in support of the motion was at most an irregularity which was not shown to have prejudiced the defendant in any way whatever.<|sentence|> The import of the order requiring him to appear and show cause was, that he was to be proceeded against for his previous default |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9873758.json | *365FOURNET, Chief Justice.
This issues in this case on appeal here are identical, from a factual1 and legal standpoint, with those resolved this day in State of Louisiana v. Jemison, 125 So. 2d 363, and for the reasons therein assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
HAWTHORNE, J., concurs.
1
. The amount involved in this case | *365FOURNET, Chief Justice.<|paragraph|>
This issues in this case on appeal here are identical, from a factual1 and legal standpoint, with those resolved this day in State of Louisiana v. Jemison, 125 So. 2d 363, and for the reasons therein assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
HAWTHORNE, J., concurs.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
1<|paragraph|>
. The amount involved in this case |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.state.gov/drl-mel-360-accompaniment-in-democratizing-drg-evaluation/index.html.json | a reimbursement or advance basis.
- Instructions for requesting payments via PMS are available at: https://pms.psc.gov/ .
- Instructions for requesting payments via SF-270 are available at: https://apply07.grants.gov/apply/forms/sample/SF270-V1.0.pdf .
Advance payments must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed to be in accordance with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient in carrying out the purpose of this award. The timing and amount | a reimbursement or advance basis.<|sentence|>
- Instructions for requesting payments via PMS are available at: https://pms.psc.gov/ .<|sentence|>
- Instructions for requesting payments via SF-270 are available at: https://apply07.grants.gov/apply/forms/sample/SF270-V1.0.pdf .<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Advance payments must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed to be in accordance with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient in carrying out the purpose of this award.<|sentence|> The timing and amount |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr5193-06.json | Products North America, Inc. (BP), a wholly owned subsidiary of BP plc, alleging that BP manipulated the price of February 2004 TET physical propane by, among other things, cornering the | Products North America, Inc. (BP), a wholly owned subsidiary of BP plc, alleging that BP manipulated the price of February 2004 TET physical propane by, among other things, cornering the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ihs.gov/rpms/applications/ftp/index.html?p=rpms\patches\apsp0700.19n2&flname=apsp0700.19n2&download=1.json | INHIBIT LOGONs during the install?
NO//", respond NO.
6. When prompted "Want to DISABLE Scheduled options, Menu options,
and Protocols? NO//" if your site has the Enter/Edit Local Drug
Interaction [PSS INTERACTION LOCAL ADD] option active (and most sites
should not), respond YES and select this option to disable. Otherwise | INHIBIT LOGONs during the install?<|sentence|>
NO//", respond NO.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
6. When prompted "Want to DISABLE Scheduled options, Menu options,
and Protocols? NO//"<|sentence|> if your site has the Enter/Edit Local Drug
Interaction [PSS INTERACTION LOCAL ADD] option active (and most sites
should not), respond YES and select this option to disable.<|sentence|> Otherwise |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3751571.json | , to-wit, the putting together the cuspidor in three pieces, is so obvious the t nothing was claimed for it in the patent, and nothing oug it to have been. Any skilled mechanic would naturally acopt it without the exercise of inventive talent.
As the defendants justify tinder the Topham patent there must be a decree in their *í¿*vor, and it is | , to-wit, the putting together the cuspidor in three pieces, is so obvious the t nothing was claimed for it in the patent, and nothing oug it to have been.<|sentence|> Any skilled mechanic would naturally acopt it without the exercise of inventive talent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
As the defendants justify tinder the Topham patent there must be a decree in their *í¿*vor, and it is |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9991528.json | Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.
May 29, 1991.
Brad B. Baker, Columbia, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for | Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
May 29, 1991.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Brad B. Baker, Columbia, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8875002.json | this action to reform the deed, and asked that it be set aside and held for naught, so far as the land so erroneously conveyed is concerned. The case was tried before a referee, and upon judgment being rendered in his favor, and a motion for a new trial having been denied by the court, the defendants appealed. The defendants Jlle and McMillan were not | this action to reform the deed, and asked that it be set aside and held for naught, so far as the land so erroneously conveyed is concerned.<|sentence|> The case was tried before a referee, and upon judgment being rendered in his favor, and a motion for a new trial having been denied by the court, the defendants appealed.<|sentence|> The defendants Jlle and McMillan were not |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9351997.json | J., and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kevin K. Covington (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying Movant’s motion to correct a manifest injustice under Supreme Court Rule 29.07(d).
Movant pled guilty to one count of second degree robbery and entered pleas to four additional counts of second degree robbery pursuant to *North Carolina v. Alford,*400 U.S. | J., and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
ORDER<|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
Kevin K. Covington (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying Movant’s motion to correct a manifest injustice under Supreme Court Rule 29.07(d).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Movant pled guilty to one count of second degree robbery and entered pleas to four additional counts of second degree robbery pursuant to *North Carolina v. Alford,*400 U.S. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4546281.json | H. Harton, Respondent, v. Abraham H. Carrick and others, Appellants.
— Order reversed, with costs. Opinion by
Brady, J. | H. Harton, Respondent, v. Abraham H. Carrick and others, Appellants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
— Order reversed, with costs.<|sentence|> Opinion by<|paragraph|>
Brady, J. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/309439.json | 10430.
#### The Village of New Lexington *v.*Childs et al.
Decided January 7, 1908.
Error to Circuit Court of Perry county.
*Mr. W. A. Allen*and *Mr. T. B. Williams,*for plaintiff in error.
*Mr. John Ferguson,*for defendants in error.
Judgment affirmed.
Price, Spear and Davis, JJ. | 10430.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### The Village of New Lexington *v.*Childs et al.<|paragraph|>
Decided January 7, 1908.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Error to Circuit Court of Perry county.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Mr. W. A. Allen*and *Mr. T. B. Williams,*for plaintiff in error.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Mr. John Ferguson,*for defendants in error.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Judgment affirmed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Price, Spear and Davis, JJ. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8343851.json | ’s equipment sustained damage in the amount of $2,400.00.
4. Respondent agrees that the amount of damages as put forth by the claimant is fair and reasonable.
The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds | ’s equipment sustained damage in the amount of $2,400.00.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
4. Respondent agrees that the amount of damages as put forth by the claimant is fair and reasonable.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nsf.gov/news/classroom/chemistry.jsp.json | -nav" role="navigation">
<div class="usa-nav-inner">
<button type="button" class="usa-nav__close">
<img src="https://new.nsf.gov/themes/custom/nsf_theme/components/images/icons/close-base-darkest.svg" alt="Close navigation" />
</button>
<div class="region region-primary-menu">
<section aria-label="Search component">
<div id=" | -nav" role="navigation"><|paragraph|>
<div class="usa-nav-inner"><|paragraph|>
<button type="button" class="usa-nav__close"><|sentence|>
<img src="https://new.nsf.gov/themes/custom/nsf_theme/components/images/icons/close-base-darkest.svg" alt="Close navigation" /><|sentence|>
</button><|paragraph|>
<div class="region region-primary-menu"><|paragraph|>
<section aria-label="Search component"><|paragraph|>
<div id=" |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6129290.json | miles; she is run down by a steamer which had, by stopping, backing, or changing her helm, absolute control of her movements.
It is apparent from Mr. Douglas’ narrative that, with the exception of starboarding the helm two spokes, nothing was done by the steamer to'warn the approaching vessel, or to avert the disaster. The testimony clearly shows that the blowing of the steamer's whistle, the stopping of the vessel, and the putting of the helm hard-a-starboard, all | miles; she is run down by a steamer which had, by stopping, backing, or changing her helm, absolute control of her movements.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
It is apparent from Mr. Douglas’ narrative that, with the exception of starboarding the helm two spokes, nothing was done by the steamer to'warn the approaching vessel, or to avert the disaster.<|sentence|> The testimony clearly shows that the blowing of the steamer's whistle, the stopping of the vessel, and the putting of the helm hard-a-starboard, all |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5390517.json | it sank, *held*not to show the sinking was due to unusual weather, so as to be within the exception in the bill of lading of dangers of the sea.
<@cs>For other cases seo same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests *&*Indexes
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Dibel by H. N. Hartwell & Sons, Incorporated, against the Neptune Dine, Incorporated, to recover the value of a cargo | it sank, *held*not to show the sinking was due to unusual weather, so as to be within the exception in the bill of lading of dangers of the sea.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
<@cs>For other cases seo same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests *&*Indexes<|paragraph|>
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Dibel by H. N. Hartwell & Sons, Incorporated, against the Neptune Dine, Incorporated, to recover the value of a cargo |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4343372.json | , § 18(d)(1), 125 Stat. 284, 329-31 (2011), and 37 C.F.R. 42.301(a), a “covered business method patent” is "a patent that claims a method or corresponding apparatus for performing data processing or other operations used in the practice, administration, or management of a financial product or service .... ”
4
. As opposed to reexamination proceedings, which were intended to be parallel proceedings. *Fresenius | , § 18(d)(1), 125 Stat. 284, 329-31 (2011), and 37 C.F.R. 42.301(a), a “covered business method patent” is "a patent that claims a method or corresponding apparatus for performing data processing or other operations used in the practice, administration, or management of a financial product or service .... ”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
4<|paragraph|>
. As opposed to reexamination proceedings, which were intended to be parallel proceedings.<|sentence|> *Fresenius |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2446827.json | not go further. The action of defendant’s counsel in the instant case, is inexcusable neglect and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.
As to the dissent of Mr. Justice Adair, I agree with the thought there delivered. However, it is not at all applicable in this case because it is specifically conceded (and the actions of counsel make the concession necessary) that counsel for plaintiff acted in complete good faith.
Two separate dissents and a special concurrence in this case demonstrate wherein the District Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to set aside the default | not go further.<|sentence|> The action of defendant’s counsel in the instant case, is inexcusable neglect and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
As to the dissent of Mr. Justice Adair, I agree with the thought there delivered.<|sentence|> However, it is not at all applicable in this case because it is specifically conceded (and the actions of counsel make the concession necessary) that counsel for plaintiff acted in complete good faith.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Two separate dissents and a special concurrence in this case demonstrate wherein the District Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to set aside the default |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/565738.json | . Dr. John Sager testified to a conversation he had with Mr. Reed in 1888, in which the latter said he had had a long litigation with Mr. Morrison, and that his business and matters were all | . Dr. John Sager testified to a conversation he had with Mr. Reed in 1888, in which the latter said he had had a long litigation with Mr. Morrison, and that his business and matters were all |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4981337.json | E. Judson v. Jack Marks.
Application denied, with ten dollars costs, and stay vacated. Present ■—Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and | E. Judson v. Jack Marks.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Application denied, with ten dollars costs, and stay vacated.<|sentence|> Present ■—Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2012/bc/pdf/b22-b33.pdf.json | ,394 9,923 9,931 9,519 4,201 705 2,401
West 18,360 16,471 16,467 16,529 7,262 1,139 4,683
Mountain 4 | ,394 9,923 9,931 9,519 4,201 705 2,401<|paragraph|>
West 18,360 16,471 16,467 16,529 7,262 1,139 4,683<|paragraph|>
Mountain 4 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12229948.json | 10-1499.
#### L. Perrigo Co. *v.*Gaeta et ux., Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for A. G., a Minor.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *PLIVA, Inc.*v. *Mensing,*564 U. S. 604 (2011). | 10-1499.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
#### L. Perrigo Co. *v.*Gaeta et ux., Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for A. G., a Minor.<|paragraph|>
C. A. 9th Cir.<|sentence|> Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *PLIVA, Inc.*v. *Mensing,*564 U. S. 604 (2011). |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/60820500/Manuscripts/2015/Man976.pdf.json | be recommended due to drastic reductions in soil NO3–N.
However, this application rate may help reduce excess NO3–N concentrations in areas where NO3–N is in excess. In situations where
irrigation or rainfall may be limited, it appears that a low temperature switchgrass biochar application may be beneficial for
improving the gravimetric soil water content, and we accept | be recommended due to drastic reductions in soil NO3–N.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
However, this application rate may help reduce excess NO3–N concentrations in areas where NO3–N is in excess.<|sentence|> In situations where
irrigation or rainfall may be limited, it appears that a low temperature switchgrass biochar application may be beneficial for
improving the gravimetric soil water content, and we accept |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1247518.json | though discovery had not been completed. The mere hope that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process does not justify a delay on the part of the court in determining the motion *(see, Mazzaferro v Barterama Corp.,*218 AD2d 643). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur. | though discovery had not been completed.<|sentence|> The mere hope that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process does not justify a delay on the part of the court in determining the motion *(see, Mazzaferro v Barterama Corp.,*218 AD2d 643).<|sentence|> Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7048411.json | Court of Louisiana.
Feb. 5, 2010.
In re Wade, George; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 80-313; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR | Court of Louisiana.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Feb. 5, 2010.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In re Wade, George; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 80-313; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/802223.json | of the minds of both parties. When received, it was what might be called a “contingent” contract. When the contingency happens, the minds of the parties meet as to all the terms which the contract expresses, and to write them over again would *235be one of those useless acts which the law does not require. 13 C. J. 246 (Note 93a).
But while the contract was a | of the minds of both parties.<|sentence|> When received, it was what might be called a “contingent” contract.<|sentence|> When the contingency happens, the minds of the parties meet as to all the terms which the contract expresses, and to write them over again would *235be one of those useless acts which the law does not require.<|sentence|> 13 C. J. 246 (Note 93a).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
But while the contract was a |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5126444.json | by the Industrial Board at thirty dollars, and the wage rate at nineteen dollars and twenty-three cents. Two girls similarly employed in the same place earned fourteen dollars and fifteen dollars, respectively. No increase beyond that was available in the place where she was employed. The Board received evidence of the earnings of lunch counter | by the Industrial Board at thirty dollars, and the wage rate at nineteen dollars and twenty-three cents.<|sentence|> Two girls similarly employed in the same place earned fourteen dollars and fifteen dollars, respectively.<|sentence|> No increase beyond that was available in the place where she was employed.<|sentence|> The Board received evidence of the earnings of lunch counter |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12523176.json | transfer to another country. The Defense Department's Classified Declaration does not convince the court otherwise.
**D. Public Interest**
Judicial authority to review habeas corpus petitions derives from U.S. citizens' rights to "freedom from arbitrary and unlawful restraint | transfer to another country.<|sentence|> The Defense Department's Classified Declaration does not convince the court otherwise.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
**D. Public Interest**<|paragraph|>
Judicial authority to review habeas corpus petitions derives from U.S. citizens' rights to "freedom from arbitrary and unlawful restraint |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1366495.json | Removal entered into evidence without objection at the hearing by Petitioners Employer. Information in a military document as to the type and nature of a discharge from service constitutes a federal finding which is final | Removal entered into evidence without objection at the hearing by Petitioners Employer.<|sentence|> Information in a military document as to the type and nature of a discharge from service constitutes a federal finding which is final |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12691211.json | , Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D18-2355
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 12, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 25, 2019
Matthew Johnson, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Per Curiam.
AFFIRMED .
Roberts, Wetherell, and Mak | , Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 1D18-2355<|paragraph|>
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.<|paragraph|>
February 12, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 25, 2019<|paragraph|>
Matthew Johnson, pro se, Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Per Curiam.<|paragraph|>
AFFIRMED .<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Roberts, Wetherell, and Mak |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1454709.json | “nonresidents or absentees.” Revised Statutes, 1889, sec. 2022. Eor, if they were sought to be held as nonresidents, there is no evidence in the present record by allegation in | “nonresidents or absentees.”<|sentence|> Revised Statutes, 1889, sec. 2022.<|sentence|> Eor, if they were sought to be held as nonresidents, there is no evidence in the present record by allegation in |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7539592.json | issue before the master was the question of title to the shares.
The special master found, in part:
> The Husband and Wife asked their broker to divide their funds into two equal portions and to title one-half in the name of the Wife and one-half in the name of the Husband. They | issue before the master was the question of title to the shares.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The special master found, in part:<|paragraph|>
> The Husband and Wife asked their broker to divide their funds into two equal portions and to title one-half in the name of the Wife and one-half in the name of the Husband.<|sentence|> They |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1430546.json | plea is as to 70 dollars of the principal debt, and to the interest since the 11th of *May,*1848, and to the costs. This plea alleges the receipt of usurious interest by the plaintiff on the notes at various times after they fell due, to-wit, in 1845, 1846 | plea is as to 70 dollars of the principal debt, and to the interest since the 11th of *May,*1848, and to the costs.<|sentence|> This plea alleges the receipt of usurious interest by the plaintiff on the notes at various times after they fell due, to-wit, in 1845, 1846 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3482820.json | a controlling authority.
It follows that the motion to compel plaintiffs’ attorneys to accept the answer of Hannah Campbell must be granted, with §10 costs to her, to abide the event, and that the motion for judgment must be denied, with §10 costs to said Hannah Campbell, and §10 costs to | a controlling authority.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
It follows that the motion to compel plaintiffs’ attorneys to accept the answer of Hannah Campbell must be granted, with §10 costs to her, to abide the event, and that the motion for judgment must be denied, with §10 costs to said Hannah Campbell, and §10 costs to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/721339.json | trial court denied the application and the plaintiff appealed.
I
The plaintiff first claims that the effect of the statute of limitations on her demand for arbitration was a coverage issue to be decided in arbitration and not a threshold issue for the court to decide. General Statutes § 38a-336 (c) mandates that “[e]ach automobile liability insurance policy issued on or after October 1, 1971, which contains a provision for binding arbitration shall include a provision for final | trial court denied the application and the plaintiff appealed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
I<|paragraph|>
The plaintiff first claims that the effect of the statute of limitations on her demand for arbitration was a coverage issue to be decided in arbitration and not a threshold issue for the court to decide.<|sentence|> General Statutes § 38a-336 (c) mandates that “[e]ach automobile liability insurance policy issued on or after October 1, 1971, which contains a provision for binding arbitration shall include a provision for final |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/xls/PET_PNP_INPT_A_EPOBGCG_YIR_MBBL_A.xls.json | # Contents
Data 1
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pnp_inpt_a_epobgcg_yir_mbbl_a.htm
Energy Information Administration
[email protected]
# Data 1
Back to | # Contents<|paragraph|>
Data 1<|paragraph|>
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pnp_inpt_a_epobgcg_yir_mbbl_a.htm<|paragraph|>
Energy Information Administration<|paragraph|>
[email protected]<|paragraph|>
# Data 1<|paragraph|>
Back to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4136470.json | F.(2d) 953.
As above stated, the government admits that no offense was committed in the presence *307of the officer, and that the search was not made incident to an arrest.
The contention of the government that under the facts the officer was justified in making the entry and search complained of is not sustained by the law. There is an orderly way to proceed in such eases, which may not be disregarded at will by government officers. Taylor v. United States, 286 | F.(2d) 953.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
As above stated, the government admits that no offense was committed in the presence *307of the officer, and that the search was not made incident to an arrest.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The contention of the government that under the facts the officer was justified in making the entry and search complained of is not sustained by the law.<|sentence|> There is an orderly way to proceed in such eases, which may not be disregarded at will by government officers.<|sentence|> Taylor v. United States, 286 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1714204.json | the facts stated the unpaid purchase price of land is a debt owing to appellee within the meaning of the statute on the subject of the taxation of debts, while appellee asserts that • the taxing officers had no right to assess the amount so unpaid as a debt for the reason that the facts stated show an executory contract for the sale of the land and not a sale; that the title Was still in appellee and that for that reason the property was still assessable to him as such; and that to assess him with the unpaid purchase price as a debt owing to him under the contract amounts | the facts stated the unpaid purchase price of land is a debt owing to appellee within the meaning of the statute on the subject of the taxation of debts, while appellee asserts that • the taxing officers had no right to assess the amount so unpaid as a debt for the reason that the facts stated show an executory contract for the sale of the land and not a sale;<|sentence|> that the title Was still in appellee and that for that reason the property was still assessable to him as such;<|sentence|> and that to assess him with the unpaid purchase price as a debt owing to him under the contract amounts |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12621274.json | nie STERLING, petitioner, v. Chuck DWYER.
No. 18-8607.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 3, 2019. | nie STERLING, petitioner, v. Chuck DWYER.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 18-8607.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Supreme Court of the United States<|paragraph|>
June 3, 2019. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10266455.json | STATE.
No. 18306.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 22, 1936.
B. A. Hamilton, of Jasper, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. | STATE.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 18306.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
April 22, 1936.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
B. A. Hamilton, of Jasper, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.acquisition.gov/dars/subpart-4.1-––-contract-execution.json | R DTAR
EDAR EDAR
EPAAR EPAAR
FEHBAR FEHBAR
GSAM/R GSAM/R
HHSAR HHSAR
HSAR HSAR
Row 5
HUDAR HUDAR
IAAR IAAR
JAR JAR
LIFAR LIFAR
NFS NFS
NRCAR NRCAR
TAR TAR
VAAR VAAR
Tools
Archives
Smart Matrix
Regulations Search
Acquisition Regulation Comparator (ARC)
Policy Network
CAOC
CAAC
FAR Council
ISDC
Breadcrumb
Home
Regulations
DARS
SUBPART 4.1 –– | R DTAR<|paragraph|>
EDAR EDAR<|paragraph|>
EPAAR EPAAR<|paragraph|>
FEHBAR FEHBAR<|paragraph|>
GSAM/R GSAM/R<|paragraph|>
HHSAR HHSAR<|paragraph|>
HSAR HSAR<|paragraph|>
Row 5<|paragraph|>
HUDAR HUDAR<|paragraph|>
IAAR IAAR<|paragraph|>
JAR JAR<|paragraph|>
LIFAR LIFAR<|paragraph|>
NFS NFS<|paragraph|>
NRCAR NRCAR<|paragraph|>
TAR TAR<|paragraph|>
VAAR VAAR<|paragraph|>
Tools<|paragraph|>
Archives<|paragraph|>
Smart Matrix<|paragraph|>
Regulations Search<|paragraph|>
Acquisition Regulation Comparator (ARC)<|paragraph|>
Policy Network<|paragraph|>
CAOC<|paragraph|>
CAAC<|paragraph|>
FAR Council<|paragraph|>
ISDC<|paragraph|>
Breadcrumb<|paragraph|>
Home<|paragraph|>
Regulations<|paragraph|>
DARS<|paragraph|>
SUBPART 4.1 –– |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4052006.json | #### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephen M. Collins, Appellant.
[935 NYS2d 266]
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. | #### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephen M. Collins, Appellant.<|paragraph|>
[935 NYS2d 266]<|paragraph|>
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5762197.json | Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered June 30, 2010, which denied defendant/third-party plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and granted third-party defendants’ motion to dismiss the third-party complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7), unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff alleges | Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered June 30, 2010, which denied defendant/third-party plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and granted third-party defendants’ motion to dismiss the third-party complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7), unanimously affirmed, with costs.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Plaintiff alleges |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4324655.json | McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). *See Jackson v. Gonzales,*496 F.3d 703, 706-07 (D.C.Cir.2007) (race discrimination under Title VII); *Dunaway v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters,*310 F.3d 758, 760-62 (D.C.Cir.2002) (age discrimination under the ADEA); *Esteños v. PAHO/WHO Fed. Credit Union,*952 A.2d 878, 889 (D.C.2008) (discrimination under the D.C. Human Rights Act). Under this framework | McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973).<|sentence|> *See Jackson v. Gonzales,*496 F.3d 703, 706-07 (D.C.Cir.2007) (race discrimination under Title VII); *Dunaway v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters,*310 F.3d 758, 760-62 (D.C.Cir.2002) (age discrimination under the ADEA); *Esteños v. PAHO/WHO Fed. Credit Union,*952 A.2d 878, 889 (D.C.2008) (discrimination under the D.C. Human Rights Act).<|sentence|> Under this framework |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7659289.json | owning a part of the lands, and both plaintiffs together owning the residue, and using all for the partnership business, a joint action by both plaintiffs to abate a nuisance, consisting of the obstruction of the | owning a part of the lands, and both plaintiffs together owning the residue, and using all for the partnership business, a joint action by both plaintiffs to abate a nuisance, consisting of the obstruction of the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ebsa/laws-and-regulations/rules-and-regulations/public-comments/tr-23-01/00052.pdf.json | ulate such data by approving each visit or day of treatment (thereby increasing the denominator)
while telling the provider verbally that further visits/days will not be approved, which is another
common occurrence. Such practices can result in meaningless data that bears little resemblance to what | ulate such data by approving each visit or day of treatment (thereby increasing the denominator)<|sentence|>
while telling the provider verbally that further visits/days will not be approved, which is another
common occurrence.<|sentence|> Such practices can result in meaningless data that bears little resemblance to what |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11934016.json | therefore is entitled to seek mitigation of any import penalties associated with the country of origin misstatements.1
*613When Pentax disclosed its country of origin misstatements, Don Myhra, Customs District Director for the District of Great Falls, Montana, informed Pentax that unpaid “marking duties”2 represent an “actual loss of duties” which must be paid as a precondition for prior disclosure treatment under 19 U.S.C. § 1592. The marking duties calculated by Pentax total $ 5,157,601.30. When Pentax received Mr. Myhra’s actual loss of duties determination, Pent | therefore is entitled to seek mitigation of any import penalties associated with the country of origin misstatements.1<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*613When Pentax disclosed its country of origin misstatements, Don Myhra, Customs District Director for the District of Great Falls, Montana, informed Pentax that unpaid “marking duties”2 represent an “actual loss of duties” which must be paid as a precondition for prior disclosure treatment under 19 U.S.C. § 1592.<|sentence|> The marking duties calculated by Pentax total $ 5,157,601.30.<|sentence|> When Pentax received Mr. Myhra’s actual loss of duties determination, Pent |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/assessments/health-ap1.html.json | Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions
- Application Receipt & Review
- Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review
- Award Process
## Post-Award Grant Management
- AHRQ Grantee Profiles
- Getting Recognition for Your AHRQ-Funded Study
- Grants by State
- No-Cost Extensions (NCEs)
## Contracts | Grant Mechanisms & Descriptions<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
- Application Receipt & Review<|sentence|>
- Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review<|sentence|>
- Award Process<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
## Post-Award Grant Management
- AHRQ Grantee Profiles<|sentence|>
- Getting Recognition for Your AHRQ-Funded Study<|sentence|>
- Grants by State<|sentence|>
- No-Cost Extensions (NCEs)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
## Contracts |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8973759.json | de Hernandez’s claims and requests for relief. . Section 1252(g) prevents the Court from granting Cervantes de Hernandez a stay of removal while it considers the substance of her habeas corpus claim. *See Sharif,*280 F.3d at 787. The substance of her claims — that there was insufficient evidence to find that she willfully misrepresented a fact on her Form Nf85 and that the IJ erroneously exercised his discretion by considering testimony about her criminal convictions — is precluded by § 2241, which allows review of only constitutional or statutory errors. The errors she complains of | de Hernandez’s claims and requests for relief.<|sentence|> . Section 1252(g) prevents the Court from granting Cervantes de Hernandez a stay of removal while it considers the substance of her habeas corpus claim.<|sentence|> *See Sharif,*280 F.3d at 787.<|sentence|> The substance of her claims — that there was insufficient evidence to find that she willfully misrepresented a fact on her Form Nf85 and that the IJ erroneously exercised his discretion by considering testimony about her criminal convictions — is precluded by § 2241, which allows review of only constitutional or statutory errors.<|sentence|> The errors she complains of |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.