source_identifier
stringlengths 40
303
⌀ | input
stringlengths 0
32.9k
| output
stringlengths 0
32.9k
|
|---|---|---|
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5871770.json | #### In re Johnson.
Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Stevens, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ | #### In re Johnson.<|paragraph|>
Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Stevens, and by him referred to the Court, denied.<|sentence|> Petition for writ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9615110.json | #### Marguerite Cecilia LANDRY, wife of Thurman Paul Hall, Jr. v. Thurman Paul HALL, Jr.
No. 63557.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Dec. 15, 1978 | #### Marguerite Cecilia LANDRY, wife of Thurman Paul Hall, Jr. v. Thurman Paul HALL, Jr.<|paragraph|>
No. 63557.<|paragraph|>
Supreme Court of Louisiana.<|paragraph|>
Dec. 15, 1978 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4306301.json | ,” and second, there must be “a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party would be subjected to the same action again.” *Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. State of | ,” and second, there must be “a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party would be subjected to the same action again.”<|sentence|> *Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. State of |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3663515.json | GREAT NORTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, v. Jess G. READ.
No. 3114.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
July 24, 1945.
John A. Johnson and Henry S. Griffing, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.
Randell S. Cobb, Atty. Gen., of Oklahoma, Fred Hansen, 1st Asst. Atty. Gen., of Oklahoma, and Leonard H. Savage, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed on | GREAT NORTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, v. Jess G. READ.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 3114.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
July 24, 1945.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
John A. Johnson and Henry S. Griffing, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Randell S. Cobb, Atty. Gen., of Oklahoma, Fred Hansen, 1st Asst. Atty. Gen., of Oklahoma, and Leonard H. Savage, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Before PHILLIPS and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
Appeal dismissed on |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7754928.json | , Appellant, v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
October 13, *11221909.)
Action by Andrew Lund against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company.
No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs | , Appellant, v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO., Respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.<|paragraph|>
October 13, *11221909.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Action by Andrew Lund against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No opinion.<|sentence|> Judgment and order affirmed, with costs |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.state.gov/biographies/helaina-r-matza/index.html.json | Acting Special Coordinator Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment
May 31, 2023 - Present
Tags
Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure | Acting Special Coordinator Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment<|paragraph|>
May 31, 2023 - Present<|paragraph|>
Tags<|paragraph|>
Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1535005.json | was presented, and voted upon: Effrick, no; Briggs, no; and Wilson, yes. The application of one Frederick was presented and voted upon: Effrick, yes; Briggs, yes; and Wilson, no. The director was instructed to draw a contract | was presented, and voted upon: Effrick, no; Briggs, no; and Wilson, yes.<|sentence|> The application of one Frederick was presented and voted upon: Effrick, yes; Briggs, yes; and Wilson, no.<|sentence|> The director was instructed to draw a contract |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3228415.json | in view of the evidence, would necessarily largely depend upon the weight which they gave to the testimony of the defendant. If they gave credence to his evidence they would be bound to acquit him. It was therefore very important to him that the jury be correctly instructed as to the law, and especially as to the manner in which they should treat his testimony.
The fifth instruction, given at the instance of the People, is as follows:
> “The court further instructs you, that while the defendant is by law a | in view of the evidence, would necessarily largely depend upon the weight which they gave to the testimony of the defendant.<|sentence|> If they gave credence to his evidence they would be bound to acquit him.<|sentence|> It was therefore very important to him that the jury be correctly instructed as to the law, and especially as to the manner in which they should treat his testimony.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The fifth instruction, given at the instance of the People, is as follows:<|paragraph|>
> “The court further instructs you, that while the defendant is by law a |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1496934.json | of Mot. at 16-19. In *Saylor v. Bastedo,*the Second Circuit affirmed based only in part on the fact that the estate of the deceased defendant had *66been settled. *See Saylor,*623 F.2d at 236-237. The Second Circuit also affirmed because the deceased party had not been deposed prior to his death, and his sons were unable to produce documents evidencing his | of Mot. at 16-19.<|sentence|> In *Saylor v. Bastedo,*the Second Circuit affirmed based only in part on the fact that the estate of the deceased defendant had *66been settled.<|sentence|> *See Saylor,*623 F.2d at 236-237.<|sentence|> The Second Circuit also affirmed because the deceased party had not been deposed prior to his death, and his sons were unable to produce documents evidencing his |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1869096.json | North, C. J.
Joseph Wetsman was the owner of a 30-apartment building in Detroit. On December 7, 1927, he and his wife, referred to herein as defendants and cross-appellants, executed and delivered a mortgage for $75,000 to the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company. The mortgage and mortgage notes provided for semi-annual payments, beginning *324with July 1, 1929, in the amount of $2,000 each, and for payment | North, C. J.<|paragraph|>
Joseph Wetsman was the owner of a 30-apartment building in Detroit.<|sentence|> On December 7, 1927, he and his wife, referred to herein as defendants and cross-appellants, executed and delivered a mortgage for $75,000 to the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company.<|sentence|> The mortgage and mortgage notes provided for semi-annual payments, beginning *324with July 1, 1929, in the amount of $2,000 each, and for payment |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12624723.json | JONES, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.
No. 17-8911.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 1, 2018.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois | JONES, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 17-8911.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Supreme Court of the United States<|paragraph|>
Oct. 1, 2018.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1368345.json | the succession of property and the rights of natural heirs is a very important one. It is not recognized by the common law of England, and exists in the United States only by special statute. Only a few of the states have ing | the succession of property and the rights of natural heirs is a very important one.<|sentence|> It is not recognized by the common law of England, and exists in the United States only by special statute.<|sentence|> Only a few of the states have ing |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2088337.json | income. *979* * * [T]he tax deferral formula of tlie bill gives recognition to the mutuals’ lack of access to the capital market for funds with which to pay losses.” Sen. Rep. No. 1881, U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News, | income.<|sentence|> *979* * * [T]he tax deferral formula of tlie bill gives recognition to the mutuals’ lack of access to the capital market for funds with which to pay losses.”<|sentence|> Sen. Rep. No. 1881, U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4818765.json | ro, Respondent, v. Moscarelli Contracting Co., Inc., etc., Appellant.
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jayeox, Manning, Kapper and | ro, Respondent, v. Moscarelli Contracting Co., Inc., etc., Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.<|sentence|> No opinion.<|sentence|> Present — Kelly, P. J., Jayeox, Manning, Kapper and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/527790.json | of the parties as affected thereby.
Appellant is the owner, by assignment, of four certain judgments, rendered against respondents Lobe and wife on November 12, 1907, November 23, 1907, January 16, 1909, and February 1, 1909, for the aggregate amount of approximately $900. On October 20, 1908, respondent Kessler entered into a contract with respondent Gustav Lo | of the parties as affected thereby.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appellant is the owner, by assignment, of four certain judgments, rendered against respondents Lobe and wife on November 12, 1907, November 23, 1907, January 16, 1909, and February 1, 1909, for the aggregate amount of approximately $900.<|sentence|> On October 20, 1908, respondent Kessler entered into a contract with respondent Gustav Lo |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11676198.json | Egan, Flanagan & Cohen, PC, Springfield, MA, for Matthew Merkl, Plaintiff.
Joseph D. Halpern, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mass., Law Department, Boston, MA, for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mass, Inc., Defendant.
*MEMORANDUM AND DECISION*
LASKER, District Judge.
Matthew Merkl, M.D. challenges the refusal by his former employer, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, | Egan, Flanagan & Cohen, PC, Springfield, MA, for Matthew Merkl, Plaintiff.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Joseph D. Halpern, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mass., Law Department, Boston, MA, for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mass, Inc., Defendant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*MEMORANDUM AND DECISION*<|paragraph|>
LASKER, District Judge.<|paragraph|>
Matthew Merkl, M.D. challenges the refusal by his former employer, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/676767.json | is et al., Appellants, v Joseph Spinola, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
[638 NYS2d 916]
—Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated December 19, 1994.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice O | is et al., Appellants, v Joseph Spinola, Respondent, et al., Defendant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
[638 NYS2d 916]<|paragraph|>
—Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated December 19, 1994.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice O |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/271404.json | &*Clarke, Inc., Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[748 NYS2d 79]
—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Makowski, J.), entered September 17, 2001, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to reargue.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City,*167 AD2d 983, 984). Present — Pine, J.P., Hayes, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton | &*Clarke, Inc., Respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(Appeal No. 2.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
[748 NYS2d 79]<|paragraph|>
—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Makowski, J.), entered September 17, 2001, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to reargue.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City,*167 AD2d 983, 984).<|sentence|> Present — Pine, J.P., Hayes, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3899055.json | DiStefano,*16 AD3d 637, 638 [2005]; *Surdo v Albany Collision Supply, Inc.,*8 AD3d 655 [2004]; *O’Leary v Bravo Hylan, LLC,*8 AD3d 542 [2004]).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Angiolillo, JJ., concur. *[See*12 Misc 3d 1159(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 50970 | DiStefano,*16 AD3d 637, 638 [2005]; *Surdo v Albany Collision Supply, Inc.,*8 AD3d 655 [2004]; *O’Leary v Bravo Hylan, LLC,*8 AD3d 542 [2004]).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.<|sentence|> Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.<|sentence|> *[See*12 Misc 3d 1159(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 50970 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/373642.json | C. CURCIO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.
October 5, 1995.
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on May 31, 1995, recommending the disbarment of EDWARD C. CURCIO of BERLIN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended *477from practice by Order of this Court dated May 27,1992, and who remains suspended at this time;
And the recommendation of disbarment being based on respondent’s conviction of one count of racketeering (18 *U.S.C.A*1962(c)); one | C. CURCIO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
October 5, 1995.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
ORDER<|paragraph|>
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on May 31, 1995, recommending the disbarment of EDWARD C. CURCIO of BERLIN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended *477from practice by Order of this Court dated May 27,1992, and who remains suspended at this time;<|sentence|>
And the recommendation of disbarment being based on respondent’s conviction of one count of racketeering (18 *U.S.C.A*1962(c)); one |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3948001.json | was reissued May 30, 1905, to James T. Cole for an improvement in water-cooler equipments. The specification relates to that class of coolers in which a large glass bottle containing pure, potable water is inverted upon a receptacle containing ice, which surrounds a conduit for the water located in the receptacle | was reissued May 30, 1905, to James T. Cole for an improvement in water-cooler equipments.<|sentence|> The specification relates to that class of coolers in which a large glass bottle containing pure, potable water is inverted upon a receptacle containing ice, which surrounds a conduit for the water located in the receptacle |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3407957.json | against Cumberland and Dorinco began to run when she received the letter that they no longer insured the Program. The letter provided actual notice to Bailey that Cumberland and Dorinco would not perform under their agreement with AIM, and she was at least on inquiry notice that the Program would not be insured at all. The assurances of AIM that it would seek to reinstate the insurance coverage may have been enough to trigger equitable tolling *865against AIM, but not against Cumberland | against Cumberland and Dorinco began to run when she received the letter that they no longer insured the Program.<|sentence|> The letter provided actual notice to Bailey that Cumberland and Dorinco would not perform under their agreement with AIM, and she was at least on inquiry notice that the Program would not be insured at all.<|sentence|> The assurances of AIM that it would seek to reinstate the insurance coverage may have been enough to trigger equitable tolling *865against AIM, but not against Cumberland |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9633458.json | ette HOUSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 73-700.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug. 9, 1974.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. | ette HOUSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 73-700.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Aug. 9, 1974.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
Affirmed. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8837925.json | . Com. (8th ed.) 396, 412; Toller on Exors. 371-375-384; Reeve on Descents, 2, 3,12,15,19,25, 28, 39, 52.; *Stanley*v. *Stanley,*1 Atk. 457; *Lloyd*v. *Tench,*2 Yes. Sr. 213; Cooper’s Justinian, 394-400; 2 Domat, 182, §§ 2804, 2928- | . Com. (8th ed.) 396, 412;<|sentence|> Toller on Exors. 371-375-384;<|sentence|> Reeve on Descents, 2, 3,12,15,19,25, 28, 39, 52.;<|sentence|> *Stanley*v. *Stanley,*1 Atk. 457;<|sentence|> *Lloyd*v. *Tench,*2 Yes. Sr. 213;<|sentence|> Cooper’s Justinian, 394-400;<|sentence|> 2 Domat, 182, §§ 2804, 2928- |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1704966.json | the ground and ran. Franks fired shots from two guns before driving away without turning on his headlights. Shortly thereafter, he ran a stop sign and collided with another vehicle. The *346collision killed a three-month-old infant passenger in the other vehicle.
Franks was charged with felony murder under Okla.Stat. tit. 21, § 701.7(B) (1981), which provides:-
> “A person also commits the crime of murder in the first degree when he takes the life of a human being, regardless of malice, in the commission of forcible rape, robbery with a dangerous weapon | the ground and ran.<|sentence|> Franks fired shots from two guns before driving away without turning on his headlights.<|sentence|> Shortly thereafter, he ran a stop sign and collided with another vehicle.<|sentence|> The *346collision killed a three-month-old infant passenger in the other vehicle.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Franks was charged with felony murder under Okla.Stat. tit. 21, § 701.7(B) (1981), which provides:-<|paragraph|>
> “A person also commits the crime of murder in the first degree when he takes the life of a human being, regardless of malice, in the commission of forcible rape, robbery with a dangerous weapon |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7062887.json | Lynch’s name is typed in the blank for the printed name of the insured; Royden Lynch’s signature is in the blank for the signature of the named insured; the correct policy number is typed into the appropriate blank, and; the blank for the date is filled in. *See Duncan v. U.S.A.A. Ins. Co.,*06-363, p. 11-12 (La.2/16/07), 950 So.2d 544, 551. The legislature has made it abundantly clear that “[a] properly completed and signed form creates a rebuttable presumption that the insured knowingly rejected coverage ...” | Lynch’s name is typed in the blank for the printed name of the insured; Royden Lynch’s signature is in the blank for the signature of the named insured; the correct policy number is typed into the appropriate blank, and; the blank for the date is filled in.<|sentence|> *See Duncan v. U.S.A.A. Ins. Co.,*06-363, p. 11-12 (La.2/16/07), 950 So.2d 544, 551.<|sentence|> The legislature has made it abundantly clear that “[a] properly completed and signed form creates a rebuttable presumption that the insured knowingly rejected coverage ...” |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.usgs.gov/search?keywords=Landslides&f[0]=usgs_facet:multimedia_image-141772&f[1]=usgs_facet:news_news-149246.json | 141776(12)
- multimedia_slideshow(4)
- multimedia_video(123)
- multimedia_video-149194(69)
- multimedia_video-149195(33)
- multimedia_video-149196(2)
- multimedia_video-149197(8)
- multimedia_video-149198(6)
- multimedia_video-149225(1)
- documents_file(6)
- documents_file-149216(1)
- documents_file-149218(1)
- documents_file-149220(4)
- news_news-149245(4) | 141776(12)<|paragraph|>
- multimedia_slideshow(4)<|paragraph|>
- multimedia_video(123)<|paragraph|>
- multimedia_video-149194(69)<|paragraph|>
- multimedia_video-149195(33)<|paragraph|>
- multimedia_video-149196(2)<|paragraph|>
- multimedia_video-149197(8)<|paragraph|>
- multimedia_video-149198(6)<|paragraph|>
- multimedia_video-149225(1)<|paragraph|>
- documents_file(6)<|paragraph|>
- documents_file-149216(1)<|paragraph|>
- documents_file-149218(1)<|paragraph|>
- documents_file-149220(4)<|paragraph|>
- news_news-149245(4) |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4596299.json | Appellants, v. Max Dorf, Respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Greenbaum | Appellants, v. Max Dorf, Respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Order affirmed, with costs.<|sentence|> No opinion.<|sentence|> Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Greenbaum |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4546281.json | H. Harton, Respondent, v. Abraham H. Carrick and others, Appellants.
— Order reversed, with costs. Opinion by
Brady, J. | H. Harton, Respondent, v. Abraham H. Carrick and others, Appellants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
— Order reversed, with costs.<|sentence|> Opinion by<|paragraph|>
Brady, J. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3656506.json | thus are mere speculation. And it is well settled that “[s]ummary judgment cannot be avoided based on speculation or conjecture.” (Citation omitted.) *Cowart v. Widener,*287 Ga. 622, 633 (3) (c) (697 SE2d 779) (2010).
Accordingly, we find that the Harmons’ wrongful death suit is barred as a matter of law, and the trial court erred in denying | thus are mere speculation.<|sentence|> And it is well settled that “[s]ummary judgment cannot be avoided based on speculation or conjecture.”<|sentence|> (Citation omitted.) *Cowart v. Widener,*287 Ga. 622, 633 (3) (c) (697 SE2d 779) (2010).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Accordingly, we find that the Harmons’ wrongful death suit is barred as a matter of law, and the trial court erred in denying |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10591886.json | Lian, Max-son, Howard & Sorensen, P.C., Minot, for appellant.
Hugh Patrick Seaworth, Asst. Atty. Gen., North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, Bismarck, for appellee.
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Robert J. DeChandt has appealed from a district court judgment affirming a 'North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau decision denying benefits beyond those already paid and ordering him to reimburse benefits paid since August 21, 1987. We reverse and remand for further | Lian, Max-son, Howard & Sorensen, P.C., Minot, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Hugh Patrick Seaworth, Asst. Atty. Gen., North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, Bismarck, for appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
VANDE WALLE, Justice.<|paragraph|>
Robert J. DeChandt has appealed from a district court judgment affirming a 'North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau decision denying benefits beyond those already paid and ordering him to reimburse benefits paid since August 21, 1987.<|sentence|> We reverse and remand for further |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1344544.json | the Paulson Firm, as the undisputed evidence establishes — we fail to see the legally dispositive nature of this assumed fact.
In order to determine whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the government, we must decide: (1) whether the Bregman Firm has | the Paulson Firm, as the undisputed evidence establishes — we fail to see the legally dispositive nature of this assumed fact.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In order to determine whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the government, we must decide: (1) whether the Bregman Firm has |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/ecfr/2024-09-16/48/1505.203.json | the synopsis requirement in FAR 5.202(a). For those contract actions, the Contracting Officer may provide for a lesser time period than the 15 days required by FAR 5.203 | the synopsis requirement in FAR 5.202(a).<|sentence|> For those contract actions, the Contracting Officer may provide for a lesser time period than the 15 days required by FAR 5.203 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3882772.json | convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]). We reject defendant’s contention that the sentence is unduly harsh | convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]).<|sentence|> We reject defendant’s contention that the sentence is unduly harsh |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/385426.json | given permission by the defendant Carlston to operate the defendant’s vehicle from the City of Garfield to the Borough of Lodi accompanied by said defendant. Upon their return from Lodi the vehicle was involved in an accident, and thereupon both Massey and defendant were apprehended.
Defendant Carlston testified that he had no knowledge | given permission by the defendant Carlston to operate the defendant’s vehicle from the City of Garfield to the Borough of Lodi accompanied by said defendant.<|sentence|> Upon their return from Lodi the vehicle was involved in an accident, and thereupon both Massey and defendant were apprehended.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Defendant Carlston testified that he had no knowledge |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9429467.json | .
In re Baton Rouge City of et al.; East Baton Rouge Parish of; Baton Rouge Met*637ropolitan Airport; — Defendants; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court | .
In re Baton Rouge City of et al.; East Baton Rouge Parish of; Baton Rouge Met*637ropolitan Airport; — Defendants; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3054101.json | broad terms employed, the general assembly has purported to authorize the motor vehicle registrar to promulgate rules or regulations calling for a helmet composed of such materials as “glass, paper maché, or concrete,” and so, useless for purposes of safety. Indeed, he further argues, the registrar could, pursuant | broad terms employed, the general assembly has purported to authorize the motor vehicle registrar to promulgate rules or regulations calling for a helmet composed of such materials as “glass, paper maché, or concrete,” and so, useless for purposes of safety.<|sentence|> Indeed, he further argues, the registrar could, pursuant |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2686943.json | lda Edlund, an Incompetent Person.
Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The orders direct the payment of allowances for attorney’s fees in an incompetency proceeding.) | lda Edlund, an Incompetent Person.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.<|sentence|> All concur.<|sentence|> (The orders direct the payment of allowances for attorney’s fees in an incompetency proceeding.) |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11041645.json | A. No."
Record at 452-453.
3
. The body of the agreement in issue reads:
> *1134"We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
> Labor and materials to erect preengineered metal warehouse building per attached specifications......
> As time is of essence, it is agreed the building will | A. No."<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Record at 452-453.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
3<|paragraph|>
. The body of the agreement in issue reads:<|paragraph|>
> *1134"We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> Labor and materials to erect preengineered metal warehouse building per attached specifications......<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> As time is of essence, it is agreed the building will |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7006806.json | personal jurisdiction should be reviewed de novo.”; also stating abuse of discretion standard).
First, the trial court erred in concluding that Gaynor Hill’s claims did not arise out of'business activity within the meaning of the | personal jurisdiction should be reviewed de novo.”;<|sentence|> also stating abuse of discretion standard).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
First, the trial court erred in concluding that Gaynor Hill’s claims did not arise out of'business activity within the meaning of the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2310476.json | , 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April *5361, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a | , 1903.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April *5361, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12540149.json | struck the victim with a machete. The victim blocked the machete with his left arm. The attack caused the victim to undergo lengthy surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital to reattach his arm, and caused permanent damage to his arm. The incident was captured on surveillance video, which was admitted in evidence and played for the jury at trial.2
During the investigation into the attack, Chelsea police officers showed still images from the surveillance video to Elizabeth Granadeno, the former | struck the victim with a machete.<|sentence|> The victim blocked the machete with his left arm.<|sentence|> The attack caused the victim to undergo lengthy surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital to reattach his arm, and caused permanent damage to his arm.<|sentence|> The incident was captured on surveillance video, which was admitted in evidence and played for the jury at trial.2<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
During the investigation into the attack, Chelsea police officers showed still images from the surveillance video to Elizabeth Granadeno, the former |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4497154.json | That could not be done, as the evidence tended to exhibit the attitude of the plaintiffs, without either payment or an agreement to pay their charges for wharfage. What Mack was authorized to do could be accomplished in no other manner, and accordingly it did include | That could not be done, as the evidence tended to exhibit the attitude of the plaintiffs, without either payment or an agreement to pay their charges for wharfage.<|sentence|> What Mack was authorized to do could be accomplished in no other manner, and accordingly it did include |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1447553.json | *ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE*
Intervenor Clark, as cross-appellant, challenges the chancellor’s ruling that the one-person, one-vote principle does not apply to constitutional conventions. Intervenor Clark cites no source for the one-person, one-vote principle other than Article 2, §§ 1 and 29. The chancellor observed that other jurisdictions have concluded that the principle does not apply to constitutional conventions because such conventions do not make laws but merely propose new | *ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE*<|paragraph|>
Intervenor Clark, as cross-appellant, challenges the chancellor’s ruling that the one-person, one-vote principle does not apply to constitutional conventions.<|sentence|> Intervenor Clark cites no source for the one-person, one-vote principle other than Article 2, §§ 1 and 29.<|sentence|> The chancellor observed that other jurisdictions have concluded that the principle does not apply to constitutional conventions because such conventions do not make laws but merely propose new |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6328850.json | #### Ohio *v.*Kentucky; and Kentucky *v.*Indiana et al.
[For earlier order herein, see, *e. g.,*454 U. S. 1076.]
Report of the Special Master on the motion of Dorothy Cole et al | #### Ohio *v.*Kentucky; and Kentucky *v.*Indiana et al.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
[For earlier order herein, see, *e. g.,*454 U. S. 1076.]<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Report of the Special Master on the motion of Dorothy Cole et al |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1171/vote_117_1_00072.xml.json | majority_requirement>
<vote_result>Nomination Confirmed</vote_result>
<document>
<document_congress>117</document_congress>
<document_type>PN</document_type>
<document_number>78-17</document_ | majority_requirement><|sentence|>
<vote_result>Nomination Confirmed<|sentence|></vote_result>
<document><|paragraph|>
<document_congress>117<|sentence|></document_congress>
<document_type>PN<|sentence|></document_type>
<document_number>78-17<|sentence|></document_ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7681455.json | CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
January 28, 1910.)
Action by the City of New York against the New York Mail & Newspaper Transportation Company.
A. O. Townsend, for appellant.
T. Connoly, for respondent.
No | CO., Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
January 28, 1910.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Action by the City of New York against the New York Mail & Newspaper Transportation Company.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
A. O. Townsend, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
T. Connoly, for respondent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2437900.json | a cause of action, and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition, as amended.
*603In the brief filed on behalf of the county, there is some reference to promises | a cause of action, and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition, as amended.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*603In the brief filed on behalf of the county, there is some reference to promises |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5312149.json | the parties must be deemed to have intended that the delivery of the plans by the plaintiff and the payment therefor by the defendant should be concurrent acts. The plaintiff proved the preparation of the plans and a tender thereof to the defendant upon payment of the plaintiff’s services therefor. The defense of non-performance was, therefore; not available. *(Scott*v. Miller, 114 App. Div. 6.) Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Jen | the parties must be deemed to have intended that the delivery of the plans by the plaintiff and the payment therefor by the defendant should be concurrent acts.<|sentence|> The plaintiff proved the preparation of the plans and a tender thereof to the defendant upon payment of the plaintiff’s services therefor.<|sentence|> The defense of non-performance was, therefore; not available.<|sentence|> *(Scott*v. Miller, 114 App. Div. 6.)<|sentence|> Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.<|sentence|> Jen |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=disease:3772&f[1]=disease:11237&f[2]=topic:11163&f[3]=topic:14002&f[4]=type:publications.json | to address the daily realities of adolescents and young people living with HIV while they are navigating issues, as well as supporting national education sectors to fulfil the needs and rights of all learners living with and are affected by HIV.
The Broad Benefits of AIDS Research
Go to The Broad Benefits of AIDS Research-Brochure
This brochure highlights | to address the daily realities of adolescents and young people living with HIV while they are navigating issues, as well as supporting national education sectors to fulfil the needs and rights of all learners living with and are affected by HIV.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The Broad Benefits of AIDS Research<|paragraph|>
Go to The Broad Benefits of AIDS Research-Brochure<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
This brochure highlights |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/811578.json | essler et ux. (et al., Appellants).
Argued December 6, 1973.
*William E. Agnew,*for appellants; *Elwood M. Malow,*for appellees.
Order affirmed.
Spaulding, J., | essler et ux. (et al., Appellants).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Argued December 6, 1973.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*William E. Agnew,*for appellants; *Elwood M. Malow,*for appellees.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Order affirmed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Spaulding, J., |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10220042.json | city.”
The notice sent to the city officials reads:
> “Notice is hereby given to Lucille D. Ogburn, Clerk of the Board of Aider-men of the City of Louisville, Kentucky that Roy E. Berry of Louisville, Kentucky, was injured on February 4th, 1950, at or about | city.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The notice sent to the city officials reads:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> “Notice is hereby given to Lucille D. Ogburn, Clerk of the Board of Aider-men of the City of Louisville, Kentucky that Roy E. Berry of Louisville, Kentucky, was injured on February 4th, 1950, at or about |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2071166.json | in justification. The authorities cited by the appellant upon the-first point were either at common law or prior to the act of 1854. The case which he mainly relies upon, *Stanley*v. *Webb,*4 Sandf., 21, was decided prior to the passage of this act, and it is no longer an authority. Indeed it was subsequently held by the same court (in 1874) that proceedings before a police magistrate were “judicial proceedings” within the meaning of the act. *Ackerman*v. *Jones,*37 Supr. Ct., 55, and cases there cited, and that there was | in justification.<|sentence|> The authorities cited by the appellant upon the-first point were either at common law or prior to the act of 1854.<|sentence|> The case which he mainly relies upon, *Stanley*v. *Webb,*4 Sandf., 21, was decided prior to the passage of this act, and it is no longer an authority.<|sentence|> Indeed it was subsequently held by the same court (in 1874) that proceedings before a police magistrate were “judicial proceedings” within the meaning of the act.<|sentence|> *Ackerman*v. *Jones,*37 Supr. Ct., 55, and cases there cited, and that there was |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8943141.json | one hour later, a driver at an intersection four miles away, will fail to see that traffic lights are not working and that other drivers were treating the intersection as a four-way stop, and that the non-observant driver will run the four-way stop, out of turn, and hurt another driver who was entering the intersection in obedience to a four-way stop rotation. To this it pleads that the company could not have known that engaging this one power line would create a general outage affecting signal lights four miles | one hour later, a driver at an intersection four miles away, will fail to see that traffic lights are not working and that other drivers were treating the intersection as a four-way stop, and that the non-observant driver will run the four-way stop, out of turn, and hurt another driver who was entering the intersection in obedience to a four-way stop rotation.<|sentence|> To this it pleads that the company could not have known that engaging this one power line would create a general outage affecting signal lights four miles |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5506958.json | Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney, Kenneth P. Borden, Joseph V. Cavanagh,*for plaintiff.
*Alan P. Cusick,*for defendant.
The | Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney, Kenneth P. Borden, Joseph V. Cavanagh,*for plaintiff.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Alan P. Cusick,*for defendant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/list?district=1&state=GA.json | Drugs and Crime
Equipment and Technology
Forensic Sciences
Youth Justice
Justice System Reform
Law Enforcement
Tribal Crime and Justice
Victims | Drugs and Crime<|paragraph|>
Equipment and Technology<|paragraph|>
Forensic Sciences<|paragraph|>
Youth Justice<|paragraph|>
Justice System Reform<|paragraph|>
Law Enforcement<|paragraph|>
Tribal Crime and Justice<|paragraph|>
Victims |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1721150.json | . Grange Mut. Cas. Co.
*Franklin County,*No. 92AP-1172.
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., | . Grange Mut. Cas. Co.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Franklin County,*No. 92AP-1172.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2370654.json | intoxicating, as alleged in the information, but shall further believe that at the time the defendant sold the same, if he sold it, he honestly believed that it was not intoxicating and would not produce a state of intoxication when drunk in reasonable quantities, such- as the human stomach will ordinarily hold, then and in such event, the defendant would not, b§ guilty, and *496it will become your duty to acquit him.” The evidence on the part | intoxicating, as alleged in the information, but shall further believe that at the time the defendant sold the same, if he sold it, he honestly believed that it was not intoxicating and would not produce a state of intoxication when drunk in reasonable quantities, such- as the human stomach will ordinarily hold, then and in such event, the defendant would not, b§ guilty, and *496it will become your duty to acquit him.<|sentence|>” The evidence on the part |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/ecfr/2024-09-16/32/552.83.json | the United States by the serviceman. In the event a contract is signed with a United States company in a foreign country, the lowest interest rate of the state or states in which the company is chartered or does business shall apply.
( b ) No contract or loan agreement shall provide for an attorney | the United States by the serviceman.<|sentence|> In the event a contract is signed with a United States company in a foreign country, the lowest interest rate of the state or states in which the company is chartered or does business shall apply.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
( b ) No contract or loan agreement shall provide for an attorney |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/641265.json | #### Boeing Airplane Co. v. Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge No. 751 of the International Association of Machinists et al.
*Frank E. Holman*and *Lowell P. Mickelwait*for petitioner.
*Lee Olwell*and *Tracy E. Griffin*for respondents. | #### Boeing Airplane Co. v. Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge No. 751 of the International Association of Machinists et al.<|paragraph|>
*Frank E. Holman*and *Lowell P. Mickelwait*for petitioner.<|paragraph|>
*Lee Olwell*and *Tracy E. Griffin*for respondents. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2094953.json | . 6d. to John Syme. That a suit being afterwards instituted against them thereon in the General Cóürt, Benjamin Harrison became bail for Robert, who, to | . 6d. to John Syme.<|sentence|> That a suit being afterwards instituted against them thereon in the General Cóürt, Benjamin Harrison became bail for Robert, who, to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12646919.json | Ellis Sadler, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff Chip Hall & Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Defendants.
No. COA16-547
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Filed: December 20, | Ellis Sadler, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff Chip Hall & Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Defendants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. COA16-547<|paragraph|>
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Filed: December 20, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7491720.json | -KA-0783.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Oct. 23, 1991.
Roger Mathes, Greenwood, for appellant.
Mike C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Appeal No. 21388 from Judgment dated Dec. 20, 1989, Durward Gray Evans, Ruling Judge; Leflore County Circuit Court.
Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ROBERTSON and SULLIVAN, | -KA-0783.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Supreme Court of Mississippi.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Oct. 23, 1991.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Roger Mathes, Greenwood, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Mike C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appeal No. 21388 from Judgment dated Dec. 20, 1989, Durward Gray Evans, Ruling Judge; Leflore County Circuit Court.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ROBERTSON and SULLIVAN, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2189313.json | Colacurcio,*514 F2d 1 (9th Cir 1975).
7
Many jurisdictions retain the mutuality requirement. *See*Annot., 31 ALR 3d, * | Colacurcio,*514 F2d 1 (9th Cir 1975).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
7<|paragraph|>
Many jurisdictions retain the mutuality requirement.<|sentence|> *See*Annot., 31 ALR 3d, * |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cftc.gov/files/dea/cotarchives/2017/options/deanymesof013117.htm.json | MINI SING FUELOIL 180 CAL SWAP - NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE Code-021A19
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/31/17 |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
NON-COMMERCIAL | COMMERCIAL | TOTAL | POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
Long | Short |Spreads | | MINI SING FUELOIL 180 CAL SWAP - NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE Code-021A19<|paragraph|>
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/31/17 |<|paragraph|>
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE<|paragraph|>
NON-COMMERCIAL | COMMERCIAL | TOTAL | POSITIONS<|paragraph|>
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------<|paragraph|>
Long | Short |Spreads | |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4077578.json | zine,*606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir.2010). “Article III requires that a plaintiffs claim be live not just when he first brings the suit but throughout the entire litigation, and once the controversy ceases to exist the court must dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.” *Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.,*975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir.1992). Olivares “must demonstrate that he has suffered or is threatened with an actual injury ... that can be redressed by a favorable decision here.” *Ok | zine,*606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir.2010).<|sentence|> “Article III requires that a plaintiffs claim be live not just when he first brings the suit but throughout the entire litigation, and once the controversy ceases to exist the court must dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.”<|sentence|> *Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.,*975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir.1992).<|sentence|> Olivares “must demonstrate that he has suffered or is threatened with an actual injury ... that can be redressed by a favorable decision here.”<|sentence|> *Ok |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9940107.json | support Arthur. Later the expert was asked if Arthur’s body could have caused the buckling that occurred in the ladder if he had landed on it while it was lying on the ground. The expert said that | support Arthur.<|sentence|> Later the expert was asked if Arthur’s body could have caused the buckling that occurred in the ladder if he had landed on it while it was lying on the ground.<|sentence|> The expert said that |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/786056.json | The application states in full the facts deemed material by the applicant to the support of her claim. The defendant demurred to the application, because' it appeared that after her appeal to the board of relief she failed to appear | The application states in full the facts deemed material by the applicant to the support of her claim.<|sentence|> The defendant demurred to the application, because' it appeared that after her appeal to the board of relief she failed to appear |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7462765.json | and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 2364; Parish of Pointe Coupee, Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 26,375 | and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 2364; Parish of Pointe Coupee, Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 26,375 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4394095.json | Wheat. Sel., vol. I, 33; Ibid, 304; 2 Johnson’s Cases, 95; Ld. Raymond, 919; 8 Burr., 416; 105 Mass., 478; Proctor v. Keith, 12 B. M., 252; 2 N. H., | Wheat.<|sentence|> Sel., vol. I, 33; Ibid, 304; 2 Johnson’s Cases, 95; Ld. Raymond, 919; 8 Burr., 416; 105 Mass., 478; Proctor v. Keith, 12 B. M., 252; 2 N. H., |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1990568.json | et al.,*Resp’ts, v. J. FRANKLIN PECK and another, Impleaded, etc., App’lts.
*James Wood,*for resp’ts; *John L. Hill,*for app’lts.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Affirming | et al.,*Resp’ts, v. J. FRANKLIN PECK and another, Impleaded, etc., App’lts.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*James Wood,*for resp’ts; *John L. Hill,*for app’lts.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Judgment affirmed, with costs.<|sentence|> All concur.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Affirming |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3532295.json | there was no reason why a person driving I east on the Braley road could not have turned into it before I . getting to the railroad track. The view taken of the evidence is I that it does not support the propositions so submitted to the jury, I and that the exception was well taken. The fact that the train I was in view of the | there was no reason why a person driving I east on the Braley road could not have turned into it before I .<|sentence|> getting to the railroad track.<|sentence|> The view taken of the evidence is I that it does not support the propositions so submitted to the jury, I and that the exception was well taken.<|sentence|> The fact that the train I was in view of the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4005797.json | the record supports Family Court’s concern over, among other things, several lapses in judgment on the part of the father. These included his action in walking around the house carrying a shotgun following a heated domestic dispute with the mother and, additionally, his attempt to show his then-13-year-old stepdaughter “videos on his computer of people having sex.” As for the mother, the record supports the finding that prior to the separation | the record supports Family Court’s concern over, among other things, several lapses in judgment on the part of the father.<|sentence|> These included his action in walking around the house carrying a shotgun following a heated domestic dispute with the mother and, additionally, his attempt to show his then-13-year-old stepdaughter “videos on his computer of people having sex.”<|sentence|> As for the mother, the record supports the finding that prior to the separation |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9387884.json | ]; *Trimmier v. Thomson,*41 S.C. 125, 128, 19 S.E. 291[, 292 (1894) ]; *Cocks v. [Bruce] Searl [ & Good],*21 T.L.R. 62 [K.B. Div.1904].”
351 Mass. at 342-43 | ]; *Trimmier v. Thomson,*41 S.C. 125, 128, 19 S.E. 291[, 292 (1894) ]; *Cocks v. [Bruce] Searl [ & Good],*21 T.L.R. 62 [K.B. Div.1904].<|sentence|>”
351 Mass. at 342-43 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas/pdfs/abrwh/scarpts/sca-bnl-imat-r1.pdf.json | the highest dose value correctly represented the dose received for all exposure situations.
According to several BNL articles (such as Xie & Rohrig 1985 and Kahnhauser 2011), there
were issues concerning the ability of the BNL neutron dosimetry system to register all the
neutron D.E. because of | the highest dose value correctly represented the dose received for all exposure situations.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
According to several BNL articles (such as Xie & Rohrig 1985 and Kahnhauser 2011), there<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
were issues concerning the ability of the BNL neutron dosimetry system to register all the<|paragraph|>
neutron D.E. because of |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.acquisition.gov/search/advanced?keys=&sort_by=search_api_relevance&sort_order=DESC&type[far_dita]=far_dita&f[0]=part_number:27&f[1]=part_number:49&f[2]=part_number:far_6.json | (111)3
(110)42
(102)31
(95)25
(93)36
(89)15
(88)14
(87)16 | (111)3<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(110)42<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(102)31<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(95)25<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(93)36<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(89)15<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(88)14<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(87)16 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4005797.json | seeking a finding of contempt against the mother and enforcement of the temporary order of visitation. Following a fact-finding *1116hearing, Family Court dismissed the father’s petitions and awarded sole custody to the mother, with visitation to the father on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 4:00 p.m.. to 7:00 p.m. and Sundays from 10:00 a.m. to | seeking a finding of contempt against the mother and enforcement of the temporary order of visitation.<|sentence|> Following a fact-finding *1116hearing, Family Court dismissed the father’s petitions and awarded sole custody to the mother, with visitation to the father on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 4:00 p.m.. to 7:00 p.m. and Sundays from 10:00 a.m. to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1418287.json | The application for reinstatement to the practice of law is granted. Leda M. C. Hartwell is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
(For earlier case, see [1988], 35 Ohio St. 3d 258, 520 N.E. 2d 226.)
Moyer, C.J., | The application for reinstatement to the practice of law is granted.<|sentence|> Leda M. C. Hartwell is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(For earlier case, see [1988], 35 Ohio St. 3d 258, 520 N.E. 2d 226.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Moyer, C.J., |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2344825.json | is conclusive against him.
Appeal from the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Merced County.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of murder, and appealed. The other facts are | is conclusive against him.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appeal from the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Merced County.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The defendant was convicted of the crime of murder, and appealed.<|sentence|> The other facts are |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12608429.json | , v. PENNSYLVANIA and Wisconsin.
No. 145, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 28, 2016.
Motion of Arkansas, et al. for leave to amend the Bill of Complaint | , v. PENNSYLVANIA and Wisconsin.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 145, Original.<|paragraph|>
Supreme Court of the United States<|paragraph|>
Nov. 28, 2016.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Motion of Arkansas, et al. for leave to amend the Bill of Complaint |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/839251.json | the respondent’s 1994 tax return income of $48,773 would result in a child support order of $169 per week. Since the 1988 order requires the respondent to pay only $25 per week, the SCU concluded that there was a basis for adjusting that order. A proposed adjusted order was forwarded to the respondent | the respondent’s 1994 tax return income of $48,773 would result in a child support order of $169 per week.<|sentence|> Since the 1988 order requires the respondent to pay only $25 per week, the SCU concluded that there was a basis for adjusting that order.<|sentence|> A proposed adjusted order was forwarded to the respondent |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1139572.json | stolen property and with second degree burglary.
During the fact-finding hearing, Terri's mother testified that she had told Terri that she "could not stay there because she was not allowed by Court to remain in our home." Report of Proceedings, at 15. She told Terri | stolen property and with second degree burglary.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
During the fact-finding hearing, Terri's mother testified that she had told Terri that she "could not stay there because she was not allowed by Court to remain in our home."<|sentence|> Report of Proceedings, at 15.<|sentence|> She told Terri |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12549314.json | (b) at least two of the multiple offenses were committed as part of one or more courses of conduct, and the harm caused by two or more of the offenses was so great or unusual that no single prison term for any of the offenses committed as part of any of the courses of conduct would | (b) at least two of the multiple offenses were committed as part of one or more courses of conduct, and the harm caused by two or more of the offenses was so great or unusual that no single prison term for any of the offenses committed as part of any of the courses of conduct would |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3899373.json | PER CURIAM:
Shahid Iman Omar appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006) his civil action challenging the validity of his federal conviction and seeking damages and injunctive relief. The district court properly denied relief because Omar has not shown | PER CURIAM:<|paragraph|>
Shahid Iman Omar appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006) his civil action challenging the validity of his federal conviction and seeking damages and injunctive relief.<|sentence|> The district court properly denied relief because Omar has not shown |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/968052.json | ; *Matter of Turk,*22 N. Y. S. 2d 4.) The ruling in *Scheu*v. *Blum*(136 App. Div. 592) does not support the | ; *Matter of Turk,*22 N. Y. S. 2d 4.<|sentence|>) The ruling in *Scheu*v. *Blum*(136 App. Div. 592) does not support the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/pdfs/niosh-034/034-042205-PopickA_sub.pdf.json | rage ruil
Dragon, Karen E.
From: Andy Popick ‘~
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:21 PM
To: | rage ruil<|paragraph|>
Dragon, Karen E.<|paragraph|>
From: Andy Popick ‘~<|paragraph|>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:21 PM<|paragraph|>
To: |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4413404.json | , and if he does either of these things his conduct may be the basis of an individual action against him for a nuisance.
B. V. SMITH and O. H. WADDLE & SONS, for appellant.
WESLEY & BROWN and WM. M. CATRON, for appellee.
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Carroll
Affirming.
The appellant is a wholesale grocery company in the | , and if he does either of these things his conduct may be the basis of an individual action against him for a nuisance.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
B. V. SMITH and O. H. WADDLE & SONS, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
WESLEY & BROWN and WM. M. CATRON, for appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Opinion op the Court by<|paragraph|>
Judge Carroll<|paragraph|>
Affirming.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The appellant is a wholesale grocery company in the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/319698.json | these examples of overall control and taking into consideration those that went beyond the requirements imposed upon Building Blocks under the statutory and regulatory requirements in which it operated (see, Education Law arts 81, 89), we find substantial evidence in the record supporting the finding that an employer- | these examples of overall control and taking into consideration those that went beyond the requirements imposed upon Building Blocks under the statutory and regulatory requirements in which it operated (see, Education Law arts 81, 89), we find substantial evidence in the record supporting the finding that an employer- |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1168093.json | arms to the jury as a means of demonstrating that he did not conform to the witnesses’ description.4
The defendant did not take the witness stand. His desire to show the tattoos to the jury requires us to address whether the proposed display is “testimonial” or “demonstrative.” If testimonial | arms to the jury as a means of demonstrating that he did not conform to the witnesses’ description.4<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The defendant did not take the witness stand.<|sentence|> His desire to show the tattoos to the jury requires us to address whether the proposed display is “testimonial” or “demonstrative.”<|sentence|> If testimonial |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9175554.json | by the trial court adequately safeguarded the defendant’s rights.
C. Trial Court’s Decision to Allow Use of a Stun Belt
Weaver next argues that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to fit him with a stun belt. The trial court determined that courtroom safety justified the use of a | by the trial court adequately safeguarded the defendant’s rights.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
C. Trial Court’s Decision to Allow Use of a Stun Belt<|paragraph|>
Weaver next argues that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to fit him with a stun belt.<|sentence|> The trial court determined that courtroom safety justified the use of a |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12123305.json | 1984), *reh den*422 Mich 1201 (1985).
I would reverse the lower court and order it to enter a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. | 1984), *reh den*422 Mich 1201 (1985).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
I would reverse the lower court and order it to enter a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7942474.json | Semonoff & Gorin, Seth K. Gifford, Providence, for defendants.
ORDER
The plaintiff’s petition to prosecute their appeal out of time as | Semonoff & Gorin, Seth K. Gifford, Providence, for defendants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
ORDER<|paragraph|>
The plaintiff’s petition to prosecute their appeal out of time as |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/kazakhstan-travel-advisory.html.json | - **Print
- **Email
- **
Facebook
- **Twitter
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U | - **Print <|paragraph|>
- **Email <|paragraph|>
- **
Facebook
<|paragraph|>
- **Twitter
<|paragraph|>
- A<|paragraph|>
- B<|paragraph|>
- C<|paragraph|>
- D<|paragraph|>
- E<|paragraph|>
- F<|paragraph|>
- G<|paragraph|>
- H<|paragraph|>
- I<|paragraph|>
- J<|paragraph|>
- K<|paragraph|>
- L<|paragraph|>
- M<|paragraph|>
- N<|paragraph|>
- O<|paragraph|>
- P<|paragraph|>
- Q<|paragraph|>
- R<|paragraph|>
- S<|paragraph|>
- T<|paragraph|>
- U |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7547266.json | The egregious nature of the police conduct is clearly shown by the threat to arrest appellant’s attorney and physically preventing the attorney from entering the interrogation room. This conduct is aggravated by the fact that the police were aware that appellant was being represented by counsel and that he was to be present during the interview. Finally, the fact that appellant was not aware that her statement was being videotaped is the kind of conduct that shocks the sensibilities of civilized society and indicates a clear violation of appellant’s due process rights.
There is no question that the admission of the videotape was not harmless error. | The egregious nature of the police conduct is clearly shown by the threat to arrest appellant’s attorney and physically preventing the attorney from entering the interrogation room.<|sentence|> This conduct is aggravated by the fact that the police were aware that appellant was being represented by counsel and that he was to be present during the interview.<|sentence|> Finally, the fact that appellant was not aware that her statement was being videotaped is the kind of conduct that shocks the sensibilities of civilized society and indicates a clear violation of appellant’s due process rights.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
There is no question that the admission of the videotape was not harmless error. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3942036.json | ,*at p. 364.)
*1357Thus, a properly drawn condition prohibiting defendant from associating with known drug users would be entirely reasonable in this case. Defendant | ,*at p. 364.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*1357Thus, a properly drawn condition prohibiting defendant from associating with known drug users would be entirely reasonable in this case.<|sentence|> Defendant |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/896611.json | to a jury of a particular composition nor is there a requirement that a particular jury mirror the community.
There is nothing in the record of this case to indicate that the process by which the jury or jury panel was selected was defective. Further, defendant did not raise this issue until after trial.
4. There is no merit to the final contention that defense | to a jury of a particular composition nor is there a requirement that a particular jury mirror the community.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
There is nothing in the record of this case to indicate that the process by which the jury or jury panel was selected was defective.<|sentence|> Further, defendant did not raise this issue until after trial.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
4. There is no merit to the final contention that defense |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9213484.json | officer in this case added two levels to Lynch’s total offense level, pursuant to section 3C1.2, because Lynch’s conduct during his flight from officers constituted obstruction of justice. This same conduct formed the basis of Lynch’s state | officer in this case added two levels to Lynch’s total offense level, pursuant to section 3C1.2, because Lynch’s conduct during his flight from officers constituted obstruction of justice.<|sentence|> This same conduct formed the basis of Lynch’s state |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/68151.json | using the average of the many urine samples provided by him and his co-workers. The average total dose to each worker in Mr. Mahoney’s category over the ten year period is equal to 2.2 rems to the bone. Dr. Hursh felt that the dose to the bone marrow would generally be estimated at one-half to two-thirds of this amount. His report shows that if Mr. Mahoney had lived in parts of Illinois where the radium in drinking water is somewhat higher than Oak Ridge, his yearly dose from natural sources would have been 0.2 rem per year | using the average of the many urine samples provided by him and his co-workers.<|sentence|> The average total dose to each worker in Mr. Mahoney’s category over the ten year period is equal to 2.2 rems to the bone.<|sentence|> Dr. Hursh felt that the dose to the bone marrow would generally be estimated at one-half to two-thirds of this amount.<|sentence|> His report shows that if Mr. Mahoney had lived in parts of Illinois where the radium in drinking water is somewhat higher than Oak Ridge, his yearly dose from natural sources would have been 0.2 rem per year |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2936175.json | the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Defendant, Hunt Tool Company, has moved this court to dismiss the above styled and numbered cause for want of jurisdiction over the subject matter of plaintiff’s claim.
Defendant argues that jurisdiction is wanting if the administrative remedies provided in the Act are not completely exhausted before the suit is filed in the district court.
The Act provides that a claimant thereunder file a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission so that they may first conciliate the claim | the 1964 Civil Rights Act.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Defendant, Hunt Tool Company, has moved this court to dismiss the above styled and numbered cause for want of jurisdiction over the subject matter of plaintiff’s claim.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Defendant argues that jurisdiction is wanting if the administrative remedies provided in the Act are not completely exhausted before the suit is filed in the district court.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The Act provides that a claimant thereunder file a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission so that they may first conciliate the claim |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6995355.json | remand. As a result, we reverse and
I. Background
The Rohrbachs own an eighty-acre parcel in unincorporated Elbert County. In 2005 | remand.<|sentence|> As a result, we reverse and<|paragraph|>
I. Background<|paragraph|>
The Rohrbachs own an eighty-acre parcel in unincorporated Elbert County.<|sentence|> In 2005 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.