source_identifier
stringlengths 40
303
⌀ | input
stringlengths 0
32.9k
| output
stringlengths 0
32.9k
|
|---|---|---|
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2903191.json | Dorman L. Ormsby, Respondent, v. Hilltop Automobile Station, Inc., Appellant.
Determination affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, | Dorman L. Ormsby, Respondent, v. Hilltop Automobile Station, Inc., Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Determination affirmed, with costs.<|sentence|> No opinion.<|sentence|> Present — Clarke, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11581696.json | defined as “a natural person who, primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, purchases, attempts to purchase, or is solicited to purchase goods or services or who commits money, property, or services in | defined as “a natural person who, primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, purchases, attempts to purchase, or is solicited to purchase goods or services or who commits money, property, or services in |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/changenotices/2008/ip50054.doc.json | Code in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix H, III.B.2 (10 CFR 50, App H).
1. Design Specification - Verify by review of design documents:
(a)that the CBs and attachment welds will not interfere with inservice inspection required by ASME | Code in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix H, III.B.2 (10 CFR 50, App H).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
1. Design Specification - Verify by review of design documents:<|paragraph|>
(a)that the CBs and attachment welds will not interfere with inservice inspection required by ASME |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/203119.json | the condition which caused the accident or that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the *490condition” *(Bradish v Tank Tech Corp.,*216 AD2d 505; *Gaeta v City of New York,*213 AD2d 509).
The deposition testimony submitted by the defendants established the absence of notice as a matter of law. The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]) as to whether the defendants either created the hazardous condition or | the condition which caused the accident or that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the *490condition” *(Bradish v Tank Tech Corp.,*216 AD2d 505; *Gaeta v City of New York,*213 AD2d 509).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The deposition testimony submitted by the defendants established the absence of notice as a matter of law.<|sentence|> The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]) as to whether the defendants either created the hazardous condition or |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2004-dn-bx-k104.json | the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
A **lock** (
A locked padlock
) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the | the United States.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
A **lock** (<|sentence|>
A locked padlock<|sentence|>
) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/58483.json | system in January 1995, defendants do not allege that the recorded call was made on Santa Fe’s system. Furthermore, Santa Fe does not monitor employee phone conversations made on its system.
Additional facts will be provided as necessary.
*II. Summary Judgment Standards*
A moving party is entitled to summary | system in January 1995, defendants do not allege that the recorded call was made on Santa Fe’s system.<|sentence|> Furthermore, Santa Fe does not monitor employee phone conversations made on its system.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Additional facts will be provided as necessary.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*II. Summary Judgment Standards*<|paragraph|>
A moving party is entitled to summary |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11193119.json | dispute are typical of the many in which the Debtor and Cham-paign successfully engaged during the course of their relationship.
Upon determining his anticipated production for an upcoming crop year, the Debtor contacted Champaign in order to arrange for the future sale of crops. The Debtor and Champaign negotiated the time of delivery, the delivery location, the quantity and grade of grain to be sold, and at least part of the eventual price upon delivery. Once these terms had been reached during a telephone conversation, Champaign forwarded to the Debtor a written “Confirmation of Grain Purchase Contract” (“Confirmation”). These Confirmations | dispute are typical of the many in which the Debtor and Cham-paign successfully engaged during the course of their relationship.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Upon determining his anticipated production for an upcoming crop year, the Debtor contacted Champaign in order to arrange for the future sale of crops.<|sentence|> The Debtor and Champaign negotiated the time of delivery, the delivery location, the quantity and grade of grain to be sold, and at least part of the eventual price upon delivery.<|sentence|> Once these terms had been reached during a telephone conversation, Champaign forwarded to the Debtor a written “Confirmation of Grain Purchase Contract” (“Confirmation”).<|sentence|> These Confirmations |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/950953.json | decision. We use a not-prece-dential opinion in cases such as this, in which a precedential opinion is rendered unnecessary because the opinion has no institutional or precedential value. *See*United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Internal Operating Procedure (I.O.P.) 5.3. Under the usual circumstances when we affirm by not-prece-dential opinion and judgment, we briefly set forth the reasons supporting the court’s decision. In this case, however, we have concluded that neither a full | decision.<|sentence|> We use a not-prece-dential opinion in cases such as this, in which a precedential opinion is rendered unnecessary because the opinion has no institutional or precedential value.<|sentence|> *See*United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Internal Operating Procedure (I.O.P.) 5.3.<|sentence|> Under the usual circumstances when we affirm by not-prece-dential opinion and judgment, we briefly set forth the reasons supporting the court’s decision.<|sentence|> In this case, however, we have concluded that neither a full |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.usbr.gov/mp/cvo/vungvari/table_22_2014.pdf.json | Tri-Valley WD 0 0 0 0 38 94 141 181 180 124 0 0 758
Tulare ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tulare Lake Basin WSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total | Tri-Valley WD 0 0 0 0 38 94 141 181 180 124 0 0 758<|paragraph|>
Tulare ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<|paragraph|>
Tulare Lake Basin WSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<|paragraph|>
Total |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10548340.json | loss is incurred the trustee may not be chargeable with the amount of the loss if it would have occurred in the absence of a breach of trust.” *Id.*§ 205, comment f. These comments find support in the cases. | loss is incurred the trustee may not be chargeable with the amount of the loss if it would have occurred in the absence of a breach of trust.”<|sentence|> *Id.*§ 205, comment f.<|sentence|> These comments find support in the cases. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12421261.json | 16
#### Corey Scott Hart v. James Patrick Brienza and Gaston County
Defs (James Patrick Brienza) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 ( | 16<|paragraph|>
#### Corey Scott Hart v. James Patrick Brienza and Gaston County<|paragraph|>
Defs (James Patrick Brienza) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 ( |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2547241.json | the Circuit Court by appeal. Its authority to act was suspended by the appeal.
An assignment of error questions the act of the court “ in entering a final order which gives effect to a law which is unconstitutional.” If this record presents a constitutional question the appeal should have been to the Supreme Court, and it is our duty to dismiss the appeal to this court. Appellant does not mean that the act under which it organized the board arid tried and removed Compton is unconstitutional. It is asserted by appellant that Compton was appointed a police officer before the act in question became a law, and it is implied | the Circuit Court by appeal.<|sentence|> Its authority to act was suspended by the appeal.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
An assignment of error questions the act of the court “ in entering a final order which gives effect to a law which is unconstitutional.”<|sentence|> If this record presents a constitutional question the appeal should have been to the Supreme Court, and it is our duty to dismiss the appeal to this court.<|sentence|> Appellant does not mean that the act under which it organized the board arid tried and removed Compton is unconstitutional.<|sentence|> It is asserted by appellant that Compton was appointed a police officer before the act in question became a law, and it is implied |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/health.gov/healthypeople/search?query=&f[0]=aggregated_topic:138&f[1]=aggregated_topic:146&f[2]=content_type:healthy_people_topic.json | Health Insurance
Health IT
Health Policy
Hospital and Emergency Services
Housing and Homes
Public Health Infrastructure
Schools
Transportation
Workplace
Social Determinants of Health
Economic Stability
Education Access and Quality
Health Care Access | Health Insurance<|paragraph|>
Health IT<|paragraph|>
Health Policy<|paragraph|>
Hospital and Emergency Services<|paragraph|>
Housing and Homes<|paragraph|>
Public Health Infrastructure<|paragraph|>
Schools<|paragraph|>
Transportation<|paragraph|>
Workplace<|paragraph|>
Social Determinants of Health<|paragraph|>
Economic Stability<|paragraph|>
Education Access and Quality<|paragraph|>
Health Care Access |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12511130.json | Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Vincent LEACH, Petitioner
No. 596 EAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 30, 2019
***ORDER***
**PER CURIAM**.
**AND NOW,** this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is **DENIED. | Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Vincent LEACH, Petitioner<|paragraph|>
No. 596 EAL 2018<|paragraph|>
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.<|paragraph|>
May 30, 2019<|paragraph|>
***ORDER***<|paragraph|>
**PER CURIAM**.<|paragraph|>
**AND NOW,** this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is **DENIED. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2153187.json | restoration of the San Diego Mission, appointing a committee therefor, and providing an appropriation to carry this into effect.
> ‘ ‘ The People of the State of California do enact as follows:
> “Section 1. The Governor of this state is hereby empowered to appoint a committee of three citizens of the State of California, to act with a -committee of like number appointed by • the San Diego Parlor of Native Sons and Daughters of the Golden West, who shall restore the Mission of San Diego.
> “Section 2. There is hereby appropriated out of the moneys in the State treasury not | restoration of the San Diego Mission, appointing a committee therefor, and providing an appropriation to carry this into effect.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> ‘ ‘ The People of the State of California do enact as follows:<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> “Section 1. The Governor of this state is hereby empowered to appoint a committee of three citizens of the State of California, to act with a -committee of like number appointed by • the San Diego Parlor of Native Sons and Daughters of the Golden West, who shall restore the Mission of San Diego.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
> “Section 2. There is hereby appropriated out of the moneys in the State treasury not |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/32008.json | ERROR — Time for Appeal — Dissolution of Garnishment. Where an order discharging or dissolving a garnishment is made (section 5251, Rev. Laws 1910), the party who obtained such garnishment having excepted to such order for the purpose of having the same reviewed in the Supreme Court upon petition in error, the court or judge granting said order shall, upon application of the proper party, fix the time, not exceeding 30 days from | ERROR — Time for Appeal — Dissolution of Garnishment.<|sentence|> Where an order discharging or dissolving a garnishment is made (section 5251, Rev. Laws 1910), the party who obtained such garnishment having excepted to such order for the purpose of having the same reviewed in the Supreme Court upon petition in error, the court or judge granting said order shall, upon application of the proper party, fix the time, not exceeding 30 days from |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=495.json | P&F Home
- Dams
- Powerplants
- Projects
- About the Database
- FAQs
- Maps
- Glossary
- Search
# CRBSCP - Las Vegas Wash Unit - Title II
State: Nevada Region: Lower Colorado Basin Region
**Related Documents**
**Related Facilities**Select a ProjectCRBSCP - Coachella Canal Unit - Title ICRBSCP - | P&F Home<|paragraph|>
- Dams<|paragraph|>
- Powerplants<|paragraph|>
- Projects<|paragraph|>
- About the Database<|paragraph|>
- FAQs<|paragraph|>
- Maps<|paragraph|>
- Glossary<|paragraph|>
- Search <|paragraph|>
# CRBSCP - Las Vegas Wash Unit - Title II<|paragraph|>
State: Nevada<|sentence|> Region: Lower Colorado Basin Region<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
**Related Documents**<|paragraph|>
**Related Facilities**<|paragraph|>Select a Project<|paragraph|>CRBSCP - Coachella Canal Unit - Title ICRBSCP - |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8783165.json | In the American State Reports, 23 A. S. R. 104, there is a very interesting note to the ease of *Morrill*v. *Morrill,*20 Oregon, 96, which should be consulted for a full study of the question. | In the American State Reports, 23 A. S. R. 104, there is a very interesting note to the ease of *Morrill*v. *Morrill,*20 Oregon, 96, which should be consulted for a full study of the question. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2013-mu-cx-0032.json | NIJ Journal
Podcasts
Publications Listing
Multimedia Listing
Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
Software & Databases
Datasets
Patents
Topics
Topics
Article Listing
Corrections
Courts | NIJ Journal<|paragraph|>
Podcasts<|paragraph|>
Publications Listing<|paragraph|>
Multimedia Listing<|paragraph|>
Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions<|paragraph|>
Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions<|paragraph|>
Software & Databases<|paragraph|>
Datasets<|paragraph|>
Patents<|paragraph|>
Topics<|paragraph|>
Topics<|paragraph|>
Article Listing<|paragraph|>
Corrections<|paragraph|>
Courts |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.copyright.gov/licensing/111/2020.2/63595.2020.2.pdf.json | in corporation or partnership)
Date:
Privacy Act Notice: Section 111 of title 17 of the United States Code authorizes the Copyright Office to collect the personally identifying information (PII) requested on this
form in order to process your statement of account. PII is any personal information that can be used to identify or trace an individual, such as name, address and telephone
numbers. By providing PII | in corporation or partnership)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Date:<|paragraph|>
Privacy Act Notice: Section 111 of title 17 of the United States Code authorizes the Copyright Office to collect the personally identifying information (PII) requested on this<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
form in order to process your statement of account.<|sentence|> PII is any personal information that can be used to identify or trace an individual, such as name, address and telephone<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
numbers.<|sentence|> By providing PII |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/railroads.dot.gov/elibrary-search?f[0]=document_series:14766&f[1]=document_series:14956.json | R&D ReportsLegislation & RegulationsFeatured
FAST Act
National Rail Plan
Proposed State Rail Plan
Civil PenaltiesLegislation & Regulations
Overview
Legislation
Regulations & Rulemaking
Buy AmericaGrants & LoansFeatured
FRA Discretionary Grant Program Tool | R&D ReportsLegislation & RegulationsFeatured<|paragraph|>
FAST Act<|sentence|>
National Rail Plan<|sentence|>
Proposed State Rail Plan<|sentence|>
Civil PenaltiesLegislation & Regulations<|paragraph|>
Overview<|sentence|>
Legislation<|sentence|>
Regulations & Rulemaking<|sentence|>
Buy AmericaGrants & LoansFeatured<|paragraph|>
FRA Discretionary Grant Program Tool |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/268353.json | guilty, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s claim that his conviction for felony assault (Penal Law § 120.10 [4]) was not based on a proper underlying felony is both unpreserved and waived by his guilty plea *(see, People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1). In any event, were we to review this claim, we would find it | guilty, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Defendant’s claim that his conviction for felony assault (Penal Law § 120.10 [4]) was not based on a proper underlying felony is both unpreserved and waived by his guilty plea *(see, People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1).<|sentence|> In any event, were we to review this claim, we would find it |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5392296.json | Appellant, v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, | Appellant, v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc., et al., Respondents.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10119053.json | year he was placed on probation for a period of 90 days upon the ground that he had violated a regulation against riding in a police vehicle except when necessary in the performance of police duty. On Sunday, August 7, 1970, while he was on duty, the owner of the Jeffersontown Shopping Center asked him to give a violation ticket to the operator of a truck which was being loaded with the merchandise and equipment of a vacating tenant and was parked in a fire lane. Upon Wilson’s refusal to do so the owner of the shopping center telephoned the may- or | year he was placed on probation for a period of 90 days upon the ground that he had violated a regulation against riding in a police vehicle except when necessary in the performance of police duty.<|sentence|> On Sunday, August 7, 1970, while he was on duty, the owner of the Jeffersontown Shopping Center asked him to give a violation ticket to the operator of a truck which was being loaded with the merchandise and equipment of a vacating tenant and was parked in a fire lane.<|sentence|> Upon Wilson’s refusal to do so the owner of the shopping center telephoned the may- or |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10517650.json | df Mont.Code Ann. § 33-22-508 and concluded (1) the Montana legislature did not intend the group health *820insurance conversion policies under § 33-22-508 to require benefits equivalent to those of the group plan, and (2) “customarily issued” in the statute refers to policies customarily issued by | df Mont.Code Ann. § 33-22-508 and concluded (1) the Montana legislature did not intend the group health *820insurance conversion policies under § 33-22-508 to require benefits equivalent to those of the group plan, and (2) “customarily issued” in the statute refers to policies customarily issued by |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2577496.json | 050 to Mrs. Winn as compensation for her services, which she never rendered, as trustee; seventeen hundred dollars to appellant Griffin, as trustee’s salary; two thousand, four hundred and seventy-five dollars | 050 to Mrs. Winn as compensation for her services, which she never rendered, as trustee;<|sentence|> seventeen hundred dollars to appellant Griffin, as trustee’s salary;<|sentence|> two thousand, four hundred and seventy-five dollars |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3534182.json | Mauve, he should submit his find to the defendant. He found the painting, which is the subject of the present dispute, and brought it to this country. Out of what took place between the parties has sprung this controversy.
The only issues raised, by the evidence were three, and in practical effect one. The plaintiff based his claim upon the simple fact of a sale and delivery of the painting for the agreed price of $5,000. The defendant denied the sale, and averred the painting to | Mauve, he should submit his find to the defendant.<|sentence|> He found the painting, which is the subject of the present dispute, and brought it to this country.<|sentence|> Out of what took place between the parties has sprung this controversy.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The only issues raised, by the evidence were three, and in practical effect one.<|sentence|> The plaintiff based his claim upon the simple fact of a sale and delivery of the painting for the agreed price of $5,000.<|sentence|> The defendant denied the sale, and averred the painting to |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.occ.gov/static/cra/craeval/jul18/10523.pdf.json | .00
Median Family Income
FFIEC Adjusted Median Family Income for 20154
Households Below Poverty Level
49,900
53,300
19%
Median Housing Value
Unemployment Rate (2010 US
Census)
124,328
4.53%
(*) The NA category consists of geographies that have not been assigned an income classification.
Source: 2010 US Census and 2015 FFIEC | .00<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Median Family Income<|paragraph|>
FFIEC Adjusted Median Family Income for 20154<|paragraph|>
Households Below Poverty Level<|paragraph|>
49,900<|sentence|>
53,300<|sentence|>
19%<|paragraph|>
Median Housing Value<|paragraph|>
Unemployment Rate (2010 US<|sentence|>
Census)<|paragraph|>
124,328<|sentence|>
4.53%<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(*) The NA category consists of geographies that have not been assigned an income classification.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Source: 2010 US Census and 2015 FFIEC |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/288276.json | may not be necessary because the agency can correct any initial errors at subsequent stages of the process; moreover, the agency’s position on important issues of fact and law may not be fully crystallized | may not be necessary because the agency can correct any initial errors at subsequent stages of the process;<|sentence|> moreover, the agency’s position on important issues of fact and law may not be fully crystallized |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1102922.json | and should not have been admitted into evidence. Photographs should be excluded only if their sole purpose is to arouse the emotions of the jury and to prejudice the defendant *(People | and should not have been admitted into evidence.<|sentence|> Photographs should be excluded only if their sole purpose is to arouse the emotions of the jury and to prejudice the defendant *(People |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=disease:3771&f[1]=disease:3772&f[2]=topic:4456&f[3]=topic:4513&f[4]=type:publications.json | AIDS), year-end 2010 United States and 6 dependent areas.
Adverse Events of Antiretroviral Drugs
Thumbnail image of Adverse Events of Antiretroviral Drugs
This internet electronic file discusses side effects of antiretroviral therapy for persons with HIV. The file provides information in table form on the most common adverse events for each of the five types of antiretroviral drugs.
2012 HIV Sourcebook for the Primary Care Provider
Thumbnail image of 2012 HIV Sourcebook for the Primary Care Provider
This monograph is a sourcebook that | AIDS), year-end 2010 United States and 6 dependent areas.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Adverse Events of Antiretroviral Drugs<|paragraph|>
Thumbnail image of Adverse Events of Antiretroviral Drugs<|paragraph|>
This internet electronic file discusses side effects of antiretroviral therapy for persons with HIV.<|sentence|> The file provides information in table form on the most common adverse events for each of the five types of antiretroviral drugs.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
2012 HIV Sourcebook for the Primary Care Provider<|paragraph|>
Thumbnail image of 2012 HIV Sourcebook for the Primary Care Provider<|paragraph|>
This monograph is a sourcebook that |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12317277.json | In the Interest of A.B.; Appeal of G.B.
567 WDA 2016
10/07/2016
Affirmed
No. DP-13 for the | In the Interest of A.B.; Appeal of G.B.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
567 WDA 2016<|paragraph|>
10/07/2016<|paragraph|>
Affirmed<|paragraph|>
No. DP-13 for the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=topic:4384&f[1]=topic:4607&f[2]=type:publications.json | 147)HIV and AIDS Prevention
(21)HIV Antibody Testing
(5)HIV Co-infection
(147)HIV Positive Persons
(26)HIV Testing
(78)HIV Test Related Counseling
(7)Home Services
(2)Home Test Kits
(2)Homosexuality
(1)Homosexuals
(4)Hospitals
(6)Hotline Operations
(1)Housing Services
(2)HPV
(3) | 147)HIV and AIDS Prevention<|paragraph|>
(21)HIV Antibody Testing<|paragraph|>
(5)HIV Co-infection<|paragraph|>
(147)HIV Positive Persons<|paragraph|>
(26)HIV Testing<|paragraph|>
(78)HIV Test Related Counseling<|paragraph|>
(7)Home Services<|paragraph|>
(2)Home Test Kits<|paragraph|>
(2)Homosexuality<|paragraph|>
(1)Homosexuals<|paragraph|>
(4)Hospitals<|paragraph|>
(6)Hotline Operations<|paragraph|>
(1)Housing Services<|paragraph|>
(2)HPV<|paragraph|>
(3) |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8780751.json | man Rural School Dist.
Mahoning County, Ohio et al. In Mandamus. Dismissed at costs of deft, in error. Dock. 5-27-25 | man Rural School Dist.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Mahoning County, Ohio et al.<|sentence|> In Mandamus.<|sentence|> Dismissed at costs of deft, in error.<|sentence|> Dock. 5-27-25 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9856853.json | , denying defendant’s motion for dismissal with prejudice, but ordered the cause dismissed without prejudice. The defendant Continental appealed, and the plaintiff Telephone Company cross assigned as error the refusal of the court to admit the copy of the lost contract.
The appeal taken by the defendant Continental is without merit. The trial court acted within his discretion in refusing to dismiss the cause with prejudice, and the appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion in | , denying defendant’s motion for dismissal with prejudice, but ordered the cause dismissed without prejudice.<|sentence|> The defendant Continental appealed, and the plaintiff Telephone Company cross assigned as error the refusal of the court to admit the copy of the lost contract.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The appeal taken by the defendant Continental is without merit.<|sentence|> The trial court acted within his discretion in refusing to dismiss the cause with prejudice, and the appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion in |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3437939.json | be prejudiced.” Fed. R.App. Pro. 4(a)(6)(A), (C). But any motion for an extension under this rule must be “filed within 180 days after the judgment or order is entered or within 14 days after the moving party receives notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 77(d) of the entry, | be prejudiced.”<|sentence|> Fed. R.App. Pro. 4(a)(6)(A), (C).<|sentence|> But any motion for an extension under this rule must be “filed within 180 days after the judgment or order is entered or within 14 days after the moving party receives notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 77(d) of the entry, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11509336.json | 's rate of *112pay between July 5, 1998 and January 4, 1999. The governor did not exercise his power under § 230.12(3)-, Stats., to disapprove JCOER's modifications to the compensation plan.
J. Denis Moran, the Director of State Courts, asked DOA to prepare to implement | 's rate of *112pay between July 5, 1998 and January 4, 1999.<|sentence|> The governor did not exercise his power under § 230.12(3)-, Stats., to disapprove JCOER's modifications to the compensation plan.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
J. Denis Moran, the Director of State Courts, asked DOA to prepare to implement |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.medpac.gov/research_area/hospitals/page/25/index.html.json | Recommendations
Payment Basics
Contractor Reports
Comment Letters
Data Book
Presentations
Fact Sheets
Congressional Testimony
Press Releases
RFI Responses
All Documents
Cite Our Work
Research Areas
Hospitals
Post-Acute Care
Ambulatory Care Settings
Delivery System Reforms
Physicians And Other Health Professionals
Private Plans
Beneficiaries and Coverage
Medicare Spending and Financing
Drugs, Devices, and Tests
Quality
Regional Issues
Public Meetings
Upcoming Meetings
Past Meetings
News MedPAC | Recommendations<|paragraph|>
Payment Basics<|paragraph|>
Contractor Reports<|paragraph|>
Comment Letters<|paragraph|>
Data Book<|paragraph|>
Presentations<|paragraph|>
Fact Sheets<|paragraph|>
Congressional Testimony<|paragraph|>
Press Releases<|paragraph|>
RFI Responses<|paragraph|>
All Documents<|paragraph|>
Cite Our Work<|paragraph|>
Research Areas<|paragraph|>
Hospitals<|paragraph|>
Post-Acute Care<|paragraph|>
Ambulatory Care Settings<|paragraph|>
Delivery System Reforms<|paragraph|>
Physicians And Other Health Professionals<|paragraph|>
Private Plans<|paragraph|>
Beneficiaries and Coverage<|paragraph|>
Medicare Spending and Financing<|paragraph|>
Drugs, Devices, and Tests<|paragraph|>
Quality<|paragraph|>
Regional Issues<|paragraph|>
Public Meetings<|paragraph|>
Upcoming Meetings<|paragraph|>
Past Meetings<|paragraph|>
News MedPAC |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9058096.json | no allegations as to whether or not the defendant Feldman actually disclosed to plaintiff Sever ... whether plaintiff Sever was working directly for defendant Feldman.” Finally, Sever argues that there was no privity of contract between | no allegations as to whether or not the defendant Feldman actually disclosed to plaintiff Sever ... whether plaintiff Sever was working directly for defendant Feldman.<|sentence|>” Finally, Sever argues that there was no privity of contract between |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/patients-families/consumer-exp/reporting/index.html.json | preferences, please enter your email address below.
### Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 Telephone: (301) 427-1364
- Careers
- Contact Us
- Español
- FAQs
- Accessibility
- Disclaimers
- EEO
- Electronic Policies
- FOIA
- | preferences, please enter your email address below.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
### Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality<|paragraph|>
5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 Telephone: (301) 427-1364<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
- Careers <|paragraph|>
- Contact Us <|paragraph|>
- Español <|paragraph|>
- FAQs <|paragraph|>
- Accessibility <|paragraph|>
- Disclaimers <|paragraph|>
- EEO <|paragraph|>
- Electronic Policies <|paragraph|>
- FOIA <|paragraph|>
- |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5348883.json | made at the point where the mercantile business is transacted. It will not be contended that if one firm was engaged in selling goods at one point, keeping hotel at another, and insurance at another, the assessment of all the personal property | made at the point where the mercantile business is transacted.<|sentence|> It will not be contended that if one firm was engaged in selling goods at one point, keeping hotel at another, and insurance at another, the assessment of all the personal property |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1624114.json | upon *McLaughlin*v. *McLaughlin,*193 Ark. 207, 99 S.W. 2d 571 (1936), to support his position that the Pulaski Chancery Court had no jurisdiction. Here, however, the proof on the part of appellee shows that she lived and worked as a legal secretary in Little Rock from 1962 to 1967, shortly before her marriage in February 1968. Also that she was without funds with which to support herself at the time of separation and that she came to *61Little Rock to seek employment. In the *McLaughlin*case, the proof was to the effect that the wife moved to Little | upon *McLaughlin*v. *McLaughlin,*193 Ark. 207, 99 S.W. 2d 571 (1936), to support his position that the Pulaski Chancery Court had no jurisdiction.<|sentence|> Here, however, the proof on the part of appellee shows that she lived and worked as a legal secretary in Little Rock from 1962 to 1967, shortly before her marriage in February 1968.<|sentence|> Also that she was without funds with which to support herself at the time of separation and that she came to *61Little Rock to seek employment.<|sentence|> In the *McLaughlin*case, the proof was to the effect that the wife moved to Little |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/76646.json | court did not err in submitting this question to the jury and in overruling the motion to dismiss on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to show wilful and wanton conduct on the part of Baker.
Defendant also complains that the court should have submitted the questions of contributory negligence and unavoidable accident to the jury.
In going to sleep Williams cannot be said to have contributed in any way to the accident and his untimely death. The court properly eliminated the question of contributory negligence from consideration of the jury.
Nor did the evidence warrant submission of the question of unavoidable accident to the jury. An unavoidable accident is one happening without fault of any | court did not err in submitting this question to the jury and in overruling the motion to dismiss on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to show wilful and wanton conduct on the part of Baker.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Defendant also complains that the court should have submitted the questions of contributory negligence and unavoidable accident to the jury.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
In going to sleep Williams cannot be said to have contributed in any way to the accident and his untimely death.<|sentence|> The court properly eliminated the question of contributory negligence from consideration of the jury.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Nor did the evidence warrant submission of the question of unavoidable accident to the jury.<|sentence|> An unavoidable accident is one happening without fault of any |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5422427.json | J. & D. Lehman Company, Respondent, v. Novelty Fabric Glove Company, Inc., Appellant.
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, ■with costs.
No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, | J. & D. Lehman Company, Respondent, v. Novelty Fabric Glove Company, Inc., Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, ■with costs.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No opinion.<|sentence|> Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.abmc.gov/news-events/events/memorial-day-2022-flanders-field-american-cemetery.json | Cemeteries & Memorials
Virtual 360s
Burial Search
Education
About Us
The Commission
History
Our Services
Annual Reports
Employment
FAQs
News
D-Day 80
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
Secondary Menu
Data
Multimedia | Cemeteries & Memorials<|paragraph|>
Virtual 360s<|paragraph|>
Burial Search<|paragraph|>
Education<|paragraph|>
About Us<|paragraph|>
The Commission<|paragraph|>
History<|paragraph|>
Our Services<|paragraph|>
Annual Reports<|paragraph|>
Employment<|paragraph|>
FAQs<|paragraph|>
News<|paragraph|>
D-Day 80<|paragraph|>
Facebook<|paragraph|>
Twitter<|paragraph|>
YouTube<|paragraph|>
Instagram<|paragraph|>
Secondary Menu<|paragraph|>
Data<|paragraph|>
Multimedia |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8661922.json | from asserting his rights as to the title to the same land. Whait benefit the act confers to the citizen, it is not o-ur province to say.
We think therefore that his Honor was in error in holding that | from asserting his rights as to the title to the same land.<|sentence|> Whait benefit the act confers to the citizen, it is not o-ur province to say.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
We think therefore that his Honor was in error in holding that |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2225280.json | dehors the record.
It seems to us, therefore, that although a discrepancy or misdescription may exist, this should not be held fatal to the bond, provided the judgment is so fully described in other respects as to identify it beyond any reasonable doubt. In this case we have the court, the names of the parties, the amount and effect of the judgment, all correctly stated, and in addition thereto the correct number of the case. It is possible that in the same court two judgments may have | dehors the record.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
It seems to us, therefore, that although a discrepancy or misdescription may exist, this should not be held fatal to the bond, provided the judgment is so fully described in other respects as to identify it beyond any reasonable doubt.<|sentence|> In this case we have the court, the names of the parties, the amount and effect of the judgment, all correctly stated, and in addition thereto the correct number of the case.<|sentence|> It is possible that in the same court two judgments may have |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4305895.json | the testator.’ In 2 Williams on Executors, 1044, it is said that when the residuary legatee is nominated, generally, he is entitled in that character to whatever may fall into the residue, after the making of the will, by lapse, invalid disposition, or other accident. In 2 Redfield on Wills, 442, it is said | the testator.’<|sentence|> In 2 Williams on Executors, 1044, it is said that when the residuary legatee is nominated, generally, he is entitled in that character to whatever may fall into the residue, after the making of the will, by lapse, invalid disposition, or other accident.<|sentence|> In 2 Redfield on Wills, 442, it is said |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.mda.mil/global/documents/pdf/ps_sasc092409.pdf.json | than any individual
sensor could produce.
8
A more advanced variant of the SM-3 has been under development
with our Japanese partners since FY 2006. This interceptor will have the
range to defend all of NATO from only a few small sites. SM-3s are also
more affordable than GBIs (you can buy four to seven production variants
of the SM-3s, IA or IB, for the cost of one GBI). But the key attribute is that
we can launch SM-3s from sea or | than any individual<|sentence|>
sensor could produce.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
8<|paragraph|>
A more advanced variant of the SM-3 has been under development<|sentence|>
with our Japanese partners since FY 2006.<|sentence|> This interceptor will have the
range to defend all of NATO from only a few small sites.<|sentence|> SM-3s are also
more affordable than GBIs (you can buy four to seven production variants
of the SM-3s, IA or IB, for the cost of one GBI).<|sentence|> But the key attribute is that
we can launch SM-3s from sea or |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10226598.json | we are unable to say that they form the basis for’ the judgment rendered by the court giving damages to 1,400 acres of land. The trial court in entering judgment for the amount above. described as'sumed it as conclusively established that | we are unable to say that they form the basis for’ the judgment rendered by the court giving damages to 1,400 acres of land.<|sentence|> The trial court in entering judgment for the amount above.<|sentence|> described as'sumed it as conclusively established that |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7045591.json | Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D08-3317.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 21, 2010.
Michael A. Catalano, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General | Florida, Appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 3D08-3317.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
July 21, 2010.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Michael A. Catalano, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Bill McCollum, Attorney General |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3848068.json | under the terms of the contract and the acceleration request;
III.To what extent Pike-Paschen is entitled to damages for any breach of contract on the part of Bat.
This opinion will also briefly discuss the issues relating to damages in order to provide the parties a potential framework for settlement negotiations or for further briefing to this Court | under the terms of the contract and the acceleration request;<|sentence|>
III.To what extent Pike-Paschen is entitled to damages for any breach of contract on the part of Bat.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
This opinion will also briefly discuss the issues relating to damages in order to provide the parties a potential framework for settlement negotiations or for further briefing to this Court |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/861459.json | 1931.
October 27, 1931.
Present: Rugg, C.J., Crosby, Carroll, Sanderson, & Field, JJ.
*Pleading, Civil,*Declaration. *Practice, Civil,*Amendment, Waiver of defect in pleading. *Carrier,*Of goods.
Evidence, at the trial of an action of contract or tort against a common carrier | 1931.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
October 27, 1931.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Present: Rugg, C.J., Crosby, Carroll, Sanderson, & Field, JJ.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Pleading, Civil,*Declaration.<|sentence|> *Practice, Civil,*Amendment, Waiver of defect in pleading.<|sentence|> *Carrier,*Of goods.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Evidence, at the trial of an action of contract or tort against a common carrier |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist_xls/N9020AK2a.xls.json | .gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9020ak2a.htm
U.S. Energy Information Administration
[email protected]
# Data 1
Back to Contents | .gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9020ak2a.htm<|paragraph|>
U.S. Energy Information Administration<|paragraph|>
[email protected]<|paragraph|>
# Data 1<|paragraph|>
Back to Contents |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10016240.json | pay certain fire department employees overtime when they were not actually working but were on call. The Court defines “on call” to include time when employees were free to go about their affairs as long as they could be contacted by radio or telephone and could come to a fire | pay certain fire department employees overtime when they were not actually working but were on call.<|sentence|> The Court defines “on call” to include time when employees were free to go about their affairs as long as they could be contacted by radio or telephone and could come to a fire |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1137886.json | was made, however, in section 751, which has not been amended since 1941. In the absence of any specific pronouncement by our appellate courts, this court will follow the decision in *People*v. *Omans (supra)*and hold that section 751 of the code alone governs appeal procedure on appeals from Courts of Special Sessions to this court *(People*v. *Palmer, supra; People*v. *Van Slyke,*31 Misc 2d 434 [1961]) and that section 521 is not applicable and does not govern such appeals.
The question remains — was defendant’ | was made, however, in section 751, which has not been amended since 1941.<|sentence|> In the absence of any specific pronouncement by our appellate courts, this court will follow the decision in *People*v. *Omans (supra)*and hold that section 751 of the code alone governs appeal procedure on appeals from Courts of Special Sessions to this court *(People*v. *Palmer, supra; People*v. *Van Slyke,*31 Misc 2d 434 [1961]) and that section 521 is not applicable and does not govern such appeals.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The question remains — was defendant’ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1074593.json | this case the recommended decision filed October 10, 1975, by Trial Judge Joseph V. Colaianni pursuant to Rule 134(h), plaintiffs having failed to file any notice of intention to except thereto and the time for so filing pursuant to the rules of the court having expired. Upon consideration thereof, without oral argument, *549since the court agrees with the recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby grants | this case the recommended decision filed October 10, 1975, by Trial Judge Joseph V. Colaianni pursuant to Rule 134(h), plaintiffs having failed to file any notice of intention to except thereto and the time for so filing pursuant to the rules of the court having expired.<|sentence|> Upon consideration thereof, without oral argument, *549since the court agrees with the recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby grants |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1048665.json | making purposes. 43 American Jurisprudence, 667, Section 143.
It was the duty of the commission in the instant case to accord the company a fair and reasonable return based on the undepreciated book cost of its properties. In arriving at such figure all legitimate taxes paid by the company out of its revenues were entitled to consideration in a determination of the percentage of return it should receive on its stipulated investment.
The city complains next there was insufficient evi* | making purposes.<|sentence|> 43 American Jurisprudence, 667, Section 143.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
It was the duty of the commission in the instant case to accord the company a fair and reasonable return based on the undepreciated book cost of its properties.<|sentence|> In arriving at such figure all legitimate taxes paid by the company out of its revenues were entitled to consideration in a determination of the percentage of return it should receive on its stipulated investment.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The city complains next there was insufficient evi* |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2689112.json | State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Leon Smith, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 58984
First District (1st Division)
October 15, 1973.
*1076James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.
Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.
PER CURIAM.
GOLDBERG | State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Leon Smith, Defendant-Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
No. 58984<|paragraph|>
First District (1st Division)<|paragraph|>
October 15, 1973.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*1076James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
GOLDBERG |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2103062.json | signed by a Judge of the Circuit Court for said county certifying in what case the services had been rendered and the amount to be paid for such services.” The bill there rendered by the. attorney was certified to and approved by one of the Judges of the Circuit Court and was then filed with the County Commissioners to be included by them in | signed by a Judge of the Circuit Court for said county certifying in what case the services had been rendered and the amount to be paid for such services.”<|sentence|> The bill there rendered by the. attorney was certified to and approved by one of the Judges of the Circuit Court and was then filed with the County Commissioners to be included by them in |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/679990.json | N. Maltbie, for a writ of mandamus requiring the auditor and commissioners of said county to issue a warrant for $294.45, alleged to be due the relator for salary as county clerk.”
The facts were that Maltbie, who was twice elected and served four successive years as county clerk, made claim for an increase of salary for a portion of his first term and a still further increase during his second term, because of changes in the classification of the | N. Maltbie, for a writ of mandamus requiring the auditor and commissioners of said county to issue a warrant for $294.45, alleged to be due the relator for salary as county clerk.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The facts were that Maltbie, who was twice elected and served four successive years as county clerk, made claim for an increase of salary for a portion of his first term and a still further increase during his second term, because of changes in the classification of the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/110165.json | Frederick B. Gieg, Jr., for appellant; Richard A. Consiglio, for appellee.
Order affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration | Frederick B. Gieg, Jr., for appellant; Richard A. Consiglio, for appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Order affirmed.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/11255680.json | HUNLEY’S EXR’X v. SHUFORD.
1. The commencement and continued prosecution of a suit, within eighteen months from the grant of letters testamentary | HUNLEY’S EXR’X v. SHUFORD.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
1. The commencement and continued prosecution of a suit, within eighteen months from the grant of letters testamentary |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12538974.json | -899
Court of Appeals of New York.
Decided September 18, 2018
Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 120 Wall Street, 28th Floor, | -899<|sentence|>
Court of Appeals of New York.<|paragraph|>
Decided September 18, 2018<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 120 Wall Street, 28th Floor, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4193709.json | injury, and mental health conditions. 172 Wn. App. at 259. The worker argued that he should have received a permanent partial disability award for the knee injury despite this injury being a contributor to the permanent total disability finding. *Stone,*172 Wn. App. at 259-60. The court disagreed, holding that the worker could not receive the permanent partial disability award when his permanent total disability was based in part on that knee injury. *Stone,*172 Wn. App. at 271. | injury, and mental health conditions.<|sentence|> 172 Wn. App. at 259.<|sentence|> The worker argued that he should have received a permanent partial disability award for the knee injury despite this injury being a contributor to the permanent total disability finding.<|sentence|> *Stone,*172 Wn. App. at 259-60.<|sentence|> The court disagreed, holding that the worker could not receive the permanent partial disability award when his permanent total disability was based in part on that knee injury.<|sentence|> *Stone,*172 Wn. App. at 271. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.state.gov/secretary-antony-j-blinken-and-african-union-commission-chairperson-moussa-faki-mahamat-before-their-meeting/index.html.json | AU is playing a leadership role in trying to bring to an end the violence and conflict in northern Ethiopia; and so I look forward to hearing from the chairman about our combined efforts to do that, and also to talk a little bit about the Africa Leaders Summit that will take place in Washington in December, where President Biden very much looks forward to hosting the African Union and many other colleagues from around the continent.
Mr. Chairman.
**CHAIRPERSON FAKI:** (Via interpreter) It’s a pleasure for me | AU is playing a leadership role in trying to bring to an end the violence and conflict in northern Ethiopia; and so I look forward to hearing from the chairman about our combined efforts to do that, and also to talk a little bit about the Africa Leaders Summit that will take place in Washington in December, where President Biden very much looks forward to hosting the African Union and many other colleagues from around the continent.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Mr. Chairman.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
**CHAIRPERSON FAKI:** (Via interpreter) It’s a pleasure for me |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10154282.json | amendment is neither necessary nor proper *to*accomplish this result.
There are sound reasons why this Act is not, and does not propose, a proper constitutional amendment. As an original proposition, it would seem that a constitutional amendment must do something, constitution-wise. In Wilson v | amendment is neither necessary nor proper *to*accomplish this result.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
There are sound reasons why this Act is not, and does not propose, a proper constitutional amendment.<|sentence|> As an original proposition, it would seem that a constitutional amendment must do something, constitution-wise.<|sentence|> In Wilson v |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/715544.json | et al. v. Rudy, et al.
(Decided November 2, 1911.)
Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.
Guardian and Ward — Action to Sell Infants’ Real Estate — Purchaser’s Bond — Liability of Surety. — In an action to recover of the principal and surety the interest of the wards in the price of real estate sold, the action as to the surety company was dismissed, and this ruling is the single question presented upon appeal. | et al. v. Rudy, et al.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
(Decided November 2, 1911.)<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Guardian and Ward — Action to Sell Infants’ Real Estate — Purchaser’s Bond — Liability of Surety.<|sentence|> — In an action to recover of the principal and surety the interest of the wards in the price of real estate sold, the action as to the surety company was dismissed, and this ruling is the single question presented upon appeal. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3922400.json | have liquidated his military pension, a claimed marital asset, and is attempting to hide the proceeds. Supreme Court denied plaintiffs motion and partially granted defendant’s cross motion to the extent of enjoining plaintiff from liquidating, disposing of | have liquidated his military pension, a claimed marital asset, and is attempting to hide the proceeds.<|sentence|> Supreme Court denied plaintiffs motion and partially granted defendant’s cross motion to the extent of enjoining plaintiff from liquidating, disposing of |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2150878.json | not of itself amount to such a commitment as is essential to lawful imprisonment in jail, and as is essential to render breaking therefrom punishable under the statute. 3. The surrender of the principal by the bail does not of itself impose a greater liability or disability on the defendant than he was under when in the hands of the officer who arrested him on the original | not of itself amount to such a commitment as is essential to lawful imprisonment in jail, and as is essential to render breaking therefrom punishable under the statute.<|sentence|> 3. The surrender of the principal by the bail does not of itself impose a greater liability or disability on the defendant than he was under when in the hands of the officer who arrested him on the original |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1990314.json | must act in good faith, with reasonable judgment, and the expense must be reasonable in amount. When all these concur, there is no reason or equity in imposing the expense upon the mortgagee and relieving the defaulting mortgagor and his land therefrom.
We are, therefore, of opinion that the tender was insufficient in amount and ineffectual, and for this reason the order of the general | must act in good faith, with reasonable judgment, and the expense must be reasonable in amount.<|sentence|> When all these concur, there is no reason or equity in imposing the expense upon the mortgagee and relieving the defaulting mortgagor and his land therefrom.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
We are, therefore, of opinion that the tender was insufficient in amount and ineffectual, and for this reason the order of the general |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/10229996.json | R. Wilson, Jr., all of Dallas, for appellants.
Chas. S. Pipkin, of Beaumont, and Gun-ter & Watson, of Port Arthur, for ap-pellee.
WALKER, Chief Justice.
This was an action by | R. Wilson, Jr., all of Dallas, for appellants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Chas. S. Pipkin, of Beaumont, and Gun-ter & Watson, of Port Arthur, for ap-pellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
WALKER, Chief Justice.<|paragraph|>
This was an action by |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2352880.json | and ever since has been the owner thereof; that before the commencement of this action they, the said defendants, satisfied the above named claim of $6,368.68 by payment to the said A. G. Kendall, assignee, and Theron N. Bell before said contracts were signed and after the same were signed by and with the consent of A. G. Kendall | and ever since has been the owner thereof;<|sentence|> that before the commencement of this action they, the said defendants, satisfied the above named claim of $6,368.68 by payment to the said A. G. Kendall, assignee, and Theron N. Bell before said contracts were signed and after the same were signed by and with the consent of A. G. Kendall |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1310489.json | jury found Brogdon guilty of second degree murder; the court sentenced him to life at hard labor.
Brogdon raises two interdependent issues on appeal. First, he argues that the prosecutor impermissibly referred to the defendant’s *post-Miranda*silence at trial in violation of *Doyle v. Ohio,*426 U.S. 610, 96 | jury found Brogdon guilty of second degree murder;<|sentence|> the court sentenced him to life at hard labor.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Brogdon raises two interdependent issues on appeal.<|sentence|> First, he argues that the prosecutor impermissibly referred to the defendant’s *post-Miranda*silence at trial in violation of *Doyle v. Ohio,*426 U.S. 610, 96 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7011535.json | General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Tanisha Roebuck, was convicted of resisting an officer with violence and resisting an officer without violence. She appeals claiming a double jeopardy violation. We agree. The acts giving rise to both convictions involved the same officer and occurred during the same incident as part of one criminal episode with no temporal break. *See Davila v. State,*98 So.3d 122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). Therefore, we reverse the conviction for resisting an officer without violence | General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.<|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
Appellant, Tanisha Roebuck, was convicted of resisting an officer with violence and resisting an officer without violence.<|sentence|> She appeals claiming a double jeopardy violation.<|sentence|> We agree.<|sentence|> The acts giving rise to both convictions involved the same officer and occurred during the same incident as part of one criminal episode with no temporal break.<|sentence|> *See Davila v. State,*98 So.3d 122 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).<|sentence|> Therefore, we reverse the conviction for resisting an officer without violence |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8141269.json | statute is silent on the subject. It must be remembered that though “all tortfeasors are not rascals”4 nevertheless a joint tortfeasor is in the eyes of the law a wrongdoer. His basic obligation to make contribution springs from the tort he jointly committed. Ultimately he is called upon to contribute his share only after his joint tortfeasor has discharged the joint liability under a settlement as prescribed by the Act.
Appellant builds an argument from the fact that the Act permits one joint tortfeasor to file a third party complaint against another in a tort action against the former.5 But | statute is silent on the subject.<|sentence|> It must be remembered that though “all tortfeasors are not rascals”4 nevertheless a joint tortfeasor is in the eyes of the law a wrongdoer.<|sentence|> His basic obligation to make contribution springs from the tort he jointly committed.<|sentence|> Ultimately he is called upon to contribute his share only after his joint tortfeasor has discharged the joint liability under a settlement as prescribed by the Act.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Appellant builds an argument from the fact that the Act permits one joint tortfeasor to file a third party complaint against another in a tort action against the former.5<|sentence|> But |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/3444517.json | distilled, &c., and' that he will pay to the collector the dpties on them.
And the 94th section provides that “ distillers of coal oil shall be subject to all the provisions of laws applicable to distillers of spirits with regard to licenses, bonds, &e., and all other provisions designed for the | distilled, &c., and' that he will pay to the collector the dpties on them.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
And the 94th section provides that “ distillers of coal oil shall be subject to all the provisions of laws applicable to distillers of spirits with regard to licenses, bonds, &e., and all other provisions designed for the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4546281.json | #### Thomas H. Harton, Respondent, v. Abraham H. Carrick and others, Appellants.
— Order reversed, with costs. Opinion by
Brady | #### Thomas H. Harton, Respondent, v. Abraham H. Carrick and others, Appellants.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
— Order reversed, with costs.<|sentence|> Opinion by<|paragraph|>
Brady |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/npin.cdc.gov/search?query=&f[0]=disease:3770&f[1]=disease:3772&f[2]=topic:13751&f[3]=topic:14000&f[4]=type:publications.json | Prevention Program Practices
Training
Basics
Surveillance and Statistics
Guidelines and Recommendations
Introducing NPIN’s Social Community
Where to go for the ABCs of viral hepatitis prevention? Join other professionals on NPIN’s | Prevention Program Practices<|paragraph|>
Training<|paragraph|>
Basics<|paragraph|>
Surveillance and Statistics<|paragraph|>
Guidelines and Recommendations<|paragraph|>
Introducing NPIN’s Social Community<|paragraph|>
Where to go for the ABCs of viral hepatitis prevention?<|sentence|> Join other professionals on NPIN’s |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.state.gov/12882/index.html.json | 1997
Scientific and Technological Cooperation: Radiological Evaluations
Implementing arrangement signed at Madrid September 15, 1997; Entered into force September 15, 1997.
Download attachment [198 KB]
Tags
Scientific and | 1997<|paragraph|>
Scientific and Technological Cooperation: Radiological Evaluations<|paragraph|>
Implementing arrangement signed at Madrid September 15, 1997;<|sentence|> Entered into force September 15, 1997.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Download attachment [198 KB]<|paragraph|>
Tags<|paragraph|>
Scientific and |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7599351.json | acht Sales v. Scott,*311 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Although the depositions need not, in order to be taxable, have been “offered into evidence” at trial, see *Schumacher v. Wellman,*415 So.2d 120, 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), and *Cohn v. Florida National Bank at Orlando,*223 So.2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969), we are aware of no decision in Florida which has gone so far as to approve the taxation of expert | acht Sales v. Scott,*311 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).<|sentence|> Although the depositions need not, in order to be taxable, have been “offered into evidence” at trial, see *Schumacher v. Wellman,*415 So.2d 120, 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), and *Cohn v. Florida National Bank at Orlando,*223 So.2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969), we are aware of no decision in Florida which has gone so far as to approve the taxation of expert |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8792211.json | contenía la caja eran unos baberos bordados por la demandante, aquél la tiró en el mostrador y se marchó.
La teoría de la contestación fué una negativa de los he-chos expuestos en esa forma y alegación de que al notar dicho empleado que la demandante tenía en sus manos una caja de pañuelos sin envolver, | contenía la caja eran unos baberos bordados por la demandante, aquél la tiró en el mostrador y se marchó.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
La teoría de la contestación fué una negativa de los he-chos expuestos en esa forma y alegación de que al notar dicho empleado que la demandante tenía en sus manos una caja de pañuelos sin envolver, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2056800.json | a class of compounds possessing these properties, “do not adequately disperse the soap precipitates.” Since neither of the secondary references mentions the lime soap problem, we do not doubt that a skilled chemist could not predict with absolute certainty whether or not the alkyl sulfoxides of Webb and Goodhue would possess adequate lime soap dispersing properties. But obviousness does not require absolute predictability, In re Moreton, 288 F.2d 940, 48 | a class of compounds possessing these properties, “do not adequately disperse the soap precipitates.”<|sentence|> Since neither of the secondary references mentions the lime soap problem, we do not doubt that a skilled chemist could not predict with absolute certainty whether or not the alkyl sulfoxides of Webb and Goodhue would possess adequate lime soap dispersing properties.<|sentence|> But obviousness does not require absolute predictability, In re Moreton, 288 F.2d 940, 48 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/6430961.json | i is ^ c,;,lrse 0f the paunt is <o ’’vp'1; vyd io *vde Vance is.*ae'*‘
*B, Hardin*for appellant, *Wicklijfe*for appellee.
Assuming no north west corner ever to have been made, and no evidence to have been introduced conducing to shew the lines, either from the north east corner or the south west corner, | i is ^ c,;,lrse 0f the paunt is <o ’’vp'1; vyd io *vde Vance is.*ae'*‘<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*B, Hardin*for appellant, *Wicklijfe*for appellee.<|paragraph|>
Assuming no north west corner ever to have been made, and no evidence to have been introduced conducing to shew the lines, either from the north east corner or the south west corner, |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1506189.json | count will necessarily be more closely related to commission of the original crime than it would in situations where the accused did not participate in the underlying crime.
We are aware of the decisions of the Seventh and Ninth Circuits which declared the misprision statute unconstitutional as applied to persons who had reasonable cause to believe that if they had reported the crime to authorities, they would be prosecuted themselves. *United States v. King, supra*(if defendants had reported crime to authorities, they would risk being prosecuted as aiders or abetters | count will necessarily be more closely related to commission of the original crime than it would in situations where the accused did not participate in the underlying crime.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
We are aware of the decisions of the Seventh and Ninth Circuits which declared the misprision statute unconstitutional as applied to persons who had reasonable cause to believe that if they had reported the crime to authorities, they would be prosecuted themselves.<|sentence|> *United States v. King, supra*(if defendants had reported crime to authorities, they would risk being prosecuted as aiders or abetters |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/2132597.json | 494 P2d 903
*Ken C. Radley,*Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
*Al J. Laue,*Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee | 494 P2d 903<|paragraph|>
*Ken C. Radley,*Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant.<|sentence|> With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
*Al J. Laue,*Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent.<|sentence|> With him on the brief were Lee |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/983961.json | , Appellant.
Submitted October 17, 2005;
decided October 20, 2005
Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 45 West 45th Street, 7 | , Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Submitted October 17, 2005;<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
decided October 20, 2005<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 45 West 45th Street, 7 |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.usgs.gov/media/videos/usgs-eros-celebrating-50-years-excellence.json | years, the people of EROS have overcome difficulties and celebrated triumphs together, always centered on providing a perspective of the Earth that helps us better understand its condition. This video, timed with the 50th anniversary celebration at EROS in August of 2023, explores the center's history.
00:00 Introduction00:08 1966-1979 - How Sioux Falls Ingenuity Secured the Center08:26 1980-1999 - Through Uncertainty to a Firm Footing15:55 2000-2023 - Data & Science Surge
### Details
### Sources/Usage
Public Domain. | years, the people of EROS have overcome difficulties and celebrated triumphs together, always centered on providing a perspective of the Earth that helps us better understand its condition.<|sentence|> This video, timed with the 50th anniversary celebration at EROS in August of 2023, explores the center's history.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
00:00 Introduction00:08 1966-1979 - How Sioux Falls Ingenuity Secured the Center08:26 1980-1999 - Through Uncertainty to a Firm Footing15:55 2000-2023 - Data & Science Surge<|paragraph|>
### Details<|paragraph|>
### Sources/Usage<|paragraph|>
Public Domain. |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/1326450.json | and constructive notice of plaintiff’s leasehold interest in said lands.4
From these findings the trial court concluded that plaintiff’s failure to sign the “Mining Lease and Option to Purchase” did not affect its validity and binding effect, that the absence of approval of any assignment of the leases by the Board of Land Commissioners had no effect upon the relationship between the parties, that plaintiff was entitled to specific performance of “defendants’5 agreement to convey and assign said leases | and constructive notice of plaintiff’s leasehold interest in said lands.4<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
From these findings the trial court concluded that plaintiff’s failure to sign the “Mining Lease and Option to Purchase” did not affect its validity and binding effect, that the absence of approval of any assignment of the leases by the Board of Land Commissioners had no effect upon the relationship between the parties, that plaintiff was entitled to specific performance of “defendants’5 agreement to convey and assign said leases |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7855110.json | coming in contact with that piece of machinery he would have taken care to avoid the risk of doing so; and it is beyond reasonable doubt that if the shaft had been boxed over, guarded with boards, or had been stopped while Boaeh and Harkins were working there, this accident would not have happened.”
These observations were pertinent, and within the sound discretion | coming in contact with that piece of machinery he would have taken care to avoid the risk of doing so;<|sentence|> and it is beyond reasonable doubt that if the shaft had been boxed over, guarded with boards, or had been stopped while Boaeh and Harkins were working there, this accident would not have happened.”<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
These observations were pertinent, and within the sound discretion |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5315991.json | Newman at this time supposed he was under arrest and for all practical purposes the officer did have him in custody. After the money was paid to the defendant, Newman was discharged and no further proceedings were taken against him. Since that time, in July, 1907, the plaintiff has procured a divorce from her said husband.
The plaintiff’s contention is that the | Newman at this time supposed he was under arrest and for all practical purposes the officer did have him in custody.<|sentence|> After the money was paid to the defendant, Newman was discharged and no further proceedings were taken against him.<|sentence|> Since that time, in July, 1907, the plaintiff has procured a divorce from her said husband.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The plaintiff’s contention is that the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4192190.json | granted by the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1635(a). They also sought damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1640 for alleged violations of the Act.
The district court1 granted summary judgment for the defendants and dismissed the action. We held the Beukeses’ appeal pending the Supreme Court’s decision in *Jesinoski v | granted by the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1635(a).<|sentence|> They also sought damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1640 for alleged violations of the Act.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
The district court1 granted summary judgment for the defendants and dismissed the action.<|sentence|> We held the Beukeses’ appeal pending the Supreme Court’s decision in *Jesinoski v |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/dotgov/www.fhfa.gov/AboutUs/Documents/2024-Bios/Bio_Anju-Vajja-2024.pdf.json | Associate
Director in DRS and Associate Director in FHFA's Division of Housing Mission
and Goals (DHMG).
Prior to joining DHMG, Vajja served as managing | Associate <|paragraph|>
Director in DRS and Associate Director in FHFA's Division of Housing Mission <|paragraph|>
and Goals (DHMG).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Prior to joining DHMG, Vajja served as managing |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/12381803.json | , P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Lisa A. March of the Law Office of Lisa A. March, P.A., Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this post-dissolution appeal, we agree with the former wife that the trial court erred in requiring the parties to equally split the responsibility of transportation for timesharing because that issue was not pled or tried by consent. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the challenged order. In all other respects, we affirm the order.1
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part | , P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Lisa A. March of the Law Office of Lisa A. March, P.A., Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
PER CURIAM.<|paragraph|>
In this post-dissolution appeal, we agree with the former wife that the trial court erred in requiring the parties to equally split the responsibility of transportation for timesharing because that issue was not pled or tried by consent.<|sentence|> Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the challenged order.<|sentence|> In all other respects, we affirm the order.1<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/9587927.json | award of an attorney’s fee is within the discretion of the trial court based upon the wife’s necessity and the husband’s ability to pay. *Carroll v. Allen,*219 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). Necessity and ability were shown below, and the court | award of an attorney’s fee is within the discretion of the trial court based upon the wife’s necessity and the husband’s ability to pay.<|sentence|> *Carroll v. Allen,*219 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).<|sentence|> Necessity and ability were shown below, and the court |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5873735.json | the events in this case from qualifying as a third form of resolution that can support prevailing party status.
Some background helps to understand the sea change caused by *Buckhannon*in this area of the law. Prior to that decision, the rule in most circuits was that a plaintiff was a “prevailing party” if it “ | the events in this case from qualifying as a third form of resolution that can support prevailing party status.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Some background helps to understand the sea change caused by *Buckhannon*in this area of the law.<|sentence|> Prior to that decision, the rule in most circuits was that a plaintiff was a “prevailing party” if it “ |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/8732151.json | . Should it however through sickness or disability become necessary, the executor may from time to time draw from the principle such sums that she may think necessary for his relief and pay the | . Should it however through sickness or disability become necessary, the executor may from time to time draw from the principle such sums that she may think necessary for his relief and pay the |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/4831065.json | . Willard R. Black, Defendant.
Order denying motion to dismiss amended complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Jayeox | . Willard R. Black, Defendant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Order denying motion to dismiss amended complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.<|sentence|> No opinion.<|sentence|> Kelly, P. J., Jayeox |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/7551735.json | 13(l)(a) and 893.13(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1987). Since there is no dispute that the possession charges are based solely on the same cocaine delivered to the officers, the multiple convictions and punishments represent a double jeopardy violation. *See Gordon v. State,*528 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), *approved sub nom. State v. Smith,*547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989); *Ramos v. State,*529 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
We affirm the judgments and sentences for delivery of cocaine. The judgments and sentences for | 13(l)(a) and 893.13(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1987).<|sentence|> Since there is no dispute that the possession charges are based solely on the same cocaine delivered to the officers, the multiple convictions and punishments represent a double jeopardy violation.<|sentence|> *See Gordon v. State,*528 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), *approved sub nom. State v. Smith,*547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989); *Ramos v. State,*529 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
We affirm the judgments and sentences for delivery of cocaine.<|sentence|> The judgments and sentences for |
s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/cap/5256935.json | -Appellant.
Gen. No. 62-M-10.
Fourth District.
September 22, 1962.
Zeno Middleton, of Belleville, | -Appellant.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Gen. No. 62-M-10.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Fourth District.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
September 22, 1962.<|sentence|><|paragraph|>
Zeno Middleton, of Belleville, |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.